Loading...
91-006 . . . ,- 1/30/91 RESOLUTION NO. 6-91 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SET-BACK VARIANCE TO GEORGE FOX WHEREAS, George Fox (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 4905 Sussex Place in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 7, Amesbury, 12th Addition and WHEREAS, Applicant has constructed a deck and gazebo at the northwest corner of his home, which gazebo encroaches ten feet into the common area of the development; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 27 November 1990, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 4 December 1990, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant and his representative appeared before the City Council at their regular meeting on 10 December 1990, at which time the Planner's memorandum was reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the Applicant, his representative, and from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the Subject Property is located in the Amesbury Planned Unit Development (P. U. D . ) . 2. T hat the gazebo was not constructed within the buildable area as described in the Development Agreement for the Amesbury P. U. D., and presently encroaches approximately ten feet into the common area of the development. . . . 3. That the Amesbury Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions does not provide for a "gazebo" as a permitted encroachment into the common area. 4. That the Shorewood City Code makes no provIsIon for "gazebos" but does require an "accessory building" to be constructed within the buildable area of the lot. 5. T hat the construction of an accessory building extending outside of the buildable area of this lot requires the grant of a variance upon a showing of hardship. 6. That Applicant's gazebo is located at the northwest corner of his residence, which is an end structure within the development and is distant approximately 56 feet from the westerly boundary of the Amesbury P.U.D. 7. T hat the typography of the lot is such that the present site of the gazebo appears to be in keeping with the most appropriate and reasonable use of the property. 8. That the design of the gazebo is in character with the main building, is compatible with other structures in the P. U. D ., and has been approved by the Landscape and Architectural Committee of the Amesbury Homeowners Association. 9. That the Applicant's construction of the gazebo without first having obtained a building permit was inadvertent and with the mistaken impression that approval by the Landscape and Architectural Committee was sufficient authorization to proceed with the construction. 10. That the Applicant has established undue hardship and has satisfied the criteria for the grant of variances under the appropriate sections of Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code. CONCLUSIONS 1. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's request for a ten foot side yard set-back variance at the northwest corner of his lot. 2. That said grant is conditioned upon the Applicant's obtaining a building permit from the City and paying all of the City's fees and costs associated herewith. . . . . . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 14th day of January, 1991. 1ftp1b,14Ikt~uJ )rt~L," Barbar~.' Brancel, MaYOr ~\E~T;'/J. ~~,) /l '~/J e.aae~l" " ~;d.i!.,J radley J elsen Acting C ,/ Administrator/Clerk Roll Call Vote: Ayes - Brancel, Daugherty, Gagne, Lewis, Stover Nays - 0