Loading...
88-043 . . . RESOLurIOO ID. 1-/6 ,flg A RESOLurIOO DENYING AN AMENIlVlENI' 10 'IHE ZCNING ORDINANCE OF 'IHE CI'lY OF SHJRE\\aD \\HEREAS, George Larson, (Applicant), owns an interest in certain land in the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, legally described as: Outlot A, Westlawn 1Wo and WHEREAS, said land (Subject Property) is presently zoned R-lA; and WHEREAS, the Appl icant has appl ied for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance whereby the Subject Property would be zoned R-1B; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application reviewed by the Planning Coomission on April 5, 1988; and WHEEAS, the Ci ty Counc il cons i dered the app Ii ca t i on at the i r regular meeting on April 11, 1988, and voted to return the application to the Planning Coomission for further study and recommendation; and WHEREAS, a further review of the application was had before the Planning Coomission on April 19, 1988; and \\HEREAS, the City Council, at their regular meeting on April 25, 1988, voted to deny the application and directed the City Attorney to prepare Findings and Conclusions for review and action by the Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting. N:lV, 1HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACI' 1. That the above-described property carries a density classification of low-density residential (1 - 2 units per acre) under the City Comprehensive Plan. 2. That a substantial majori ty of the land in the imnediate area of the Subject Property is classified as semi-rural residential (0 - 1 uni t per acre). . .. . 3. That the increase in density proposed by the amendment would be inconsistent with the density as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent areas. 4. That an increase in density for the Subject Property would be adverse to the general welfare, public health and safety of the community. 5. That the proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be inconsistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. <XN;LUS IOOS That based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby denies Applicant's request for an amendment to the City Comprehensive Plan changing the classification of the Subject Property from semi -resident ial (0 - 1 uni t per acre) to low-density residential (1 - 2 units per acre). AOOPTED BY 'IHE CI'lY axJNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1988. Robert Rascop, Mayor ATrEST: Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk . . . RESOLurICN tU. 1i2._~_?~ A RESOLurICN DENYING AN .M1ENIlVlENl' 10 1HE zeNING ClIDlNANCE OF 1HE CITY OF SI-Dill\\aD WHERFAS, George Larson, (Applicant), owns an interest in certain land in the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, legally described as: Outlot A, Westlawn Two and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is presently zoned R-lA; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance whereby the Subject Property would be zoned R-1B; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application reviewed by the Planning Carrnission on April 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, a further review of the application was had before the < Planning Canmission on April 19, 1988; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at their regular meeting on April 25, 1988, voted to deny the application and directed the City Attorney to prepare Findings and Conclusions for review and action by the Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting. < 10\1, 1HEREFUill, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci ty of Shorewood as follows: FINDlOOS OF FACI' 1. That the above-described property carries a density /Classi fication of low-densi ty residential(I-- 2 uni tgper acre) under the / City Comprehensive Plan. 2. That a substantial majority of the lmld in the immediate area of the Subject Property is classified as semi-rural residential (0 - 1 uni t per acre). . 3. That the increase in density proposed by the amendnent would be inconsistent with the density as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent areas. 4. That &1 increase in density for the Subject Property would be adverse to the general welfare, public health and safety of the community. 5. That the proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be inconsistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. cx:NCLUS ICNS That based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby denies Applicant's request for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance changing the classification of the Subject Property from R-lA to R-1B. AlX)PI'ED BY TIlE CITI CUJNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1988. ATrEST: Robert Rascop, Mayor ~ Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk .