The URL can be used to link to this page

091205 CC Reg AgP . f I J . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love _ Lizee Turgeon _ Callies Wellens B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, August 22, 2005 (Art. - Minutes) B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, August 22, 2005 (Art.- Minutes) C. City Council Work Session Minutes, August 22,2005 (Att. - Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removedfrom the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Art.- Claims List) B. Staffing - no action required C. City Clerk's License Approvals -Temporary Liquor License for Municipal Liquor Store Wine Tasting Events (Art. - Deputy Clerk's memorandum, 3 Resolutions) D. Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for 2005 Pavement Marking and Radisson Road Improvement Projects (Art. - Public Works Director's memorandum, Resolution) E. Resolution Proclaiming November 12-19, 2005 to be Housing Awareness Week (Art.- Resolution) F. Accept Proposal from American Engineering and Testing, Inc. for Professional Engineering Services (Art. - Public Works Director's memorandum) 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) . ,) . . . . . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 PAGE20F2 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS 6. PUBLIC HEARING 7. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held August 23, 2005 (Art.- Draft Minutes) 8. PLANNING - Report by Representative A. Approval of Final Plat - Lake Virginia Woods (Art. - Engineering Consultant's Memorandum, Planning Director's Memorandum, Draft Resolution/Development . Agreement) 9. GENERALlNEW BUSINESS A. Acceptance of the 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program (Art.- Finance Director's memorandum, Resolution) B. Approval of the 2006 Proposed Budget and Serting the Truth-in-Taxation Public Hearing Dates (Art.- Finance Director's memorandum, 2 Resolutions) C. South Lake Minnetonka Police Department 2006 Interim Funding and Resolution Proposal (Art. - Administrator's memorandum) D. Request for Permanent No Parking Restrictions - Birch Bluff Road (Art. - Notice to Residents, Petition, Draft Resolution) 10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Accept Feasibility Report for the Interconnection of the SE Area Well and Amesbury Well Systems, and Authorize Preparation of Plans Specifications and Engineers Estimate (Art. - Public Works Director's memoranduIp., Resolution) " 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. County Road 19 Intersection B. Mayor & City Council 12. ADJOURN CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 12 September 2005 A work session will follow tonight's regular Council meeting. . Councilmember Wellens may be absent from tonight's meeting. Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval. Agenda Item #3B: Staffing - no action required. . Agenda Item #3C: Shorewood Liquor is applying for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for three of its Wine Club events to be held at the Southshore Center, 5735 Country Club Road, on Wednesday, September 14, 2005; Wednesday, January 18, 2006; and Wednesday, May 10, 2006. A separate Temporary Liquor License application is required for each date. Three separate resolutions approving a Temporary Liquor License have been prepared for Council approval. . Agenda Item #3D: Staff is recommending approval of a resolution that accepts the bids and awards the contract to AM Striping Service Company in the amount of$9,888.98 for the 2005 Pavement Marking and Radisson Road Improvement Projects. Agenda Item #3E: Intercongregation Communities Association (lCA) has requested the City consider a resolution proclaiming November 12-19 as Housing Awareness Week 2005. This is a statewide campaign for save and affordable housing for all people. A resolution is attached for Council approval. Agenda Item #3F: Staff is recommending approval ofa motion that accepts the proposal provided by American Engineering and Testing, Inc. for geotechnical engineering services for the City Hall site, not to exceed $3,900. Agenda Item #7 A: A report will be provided on the Park Commission meeting of August 23, 2005. . Agenda Item #8A: Pemsteiner and Associates has submitted a final plat for its Lake Virginia Woods residential development. Staffhas recommended approval, subject to conditions set forth in the Planning Director's memorandum, the consulting engineer's memorandum, and the draft development agreement included herein. #1l- t~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of September 12, 2005 Page 2 of2 Agenda Item #9A: The 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been prepared for approval by the City Council. It includes the changes as indicated by the Council at this summer's budget work-sessions. Staff recommends that Council adopt the resolution approving the 2006-2010 CIP. Agenda Item #9B: The City Council is required to approve a proposed budget and tax levy by September 15, according to Truth-In-Taxation laws. The enclosed 2006 Proposed General Fund budget and tax levy has been prepared in accordance with City Council recommendations. The Pay2006 proposed and levy is $4,247,395, and includes the special levy necessary to pay for the public safety facilities. It also provides for transfers to the capital improvement funds. The Council may change the property tax levy and budget prior to final adoption of both in December.Staffrecommends that Council adopt the resolutions that: (1) sets the proposed tax levy payable in 2006 (which may not be exceeded); (2) approves the proposed 2006 budget; and (3) sets December 5, 2005, as the date for the Truth-in- Taxation hearing. Agenda Item # 9C: The city councils of Shorewood, Greenwood, and Tonka Bay approved, by the August 31 deadline, the "final proposal" for SLMPD funding for 2006 and resolution of issues that was endorsed by the SLMPD Coordinating Committee. On August 29, the city council of Excelsior modified the final proposal and requested the other city councils to approve Excelsior's version. On September 6, the Greenwood city council decided to take no action on the last Excelsior proposal. Tonka Bay will consider it on September 13. The Council should decide whether to approve or reject the last Excelsior proposal and, if it chooses the latter, may wish to state it has already indicated the final proposal it will support. Agenda Item # 9D: The City has received a petition from numerous residents along Birch Bluff Road, requesting permanent no parking restrictions for the north side of the street between Grant Lorenz Road and Eureka Road. Planning and Engineering staff agree with the arguments set forth in petition and recommend approval of a resolution establishing the parking restriction. Per City policy, we have notified all property owners of record along Birch Bluff Road of the impending discussion. Agenda Item #10A: Included in the City Council packet is a feasibility report, prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc., for consideration of the interconnection of the Southeast Area and Amesbury Area water systems. Staff is recommending that the feasibility report be accepted, and that plans and specifications be prepared for the extension of a trunk main from the intersection of St. Albans Bay with Excelsior Boulevard, along St. Albans Bay to Manor Road, and Manor Road to Knightsbridge Road. (Known as Alternative 1B). Staff feels that this alternative is the most cost-effective route, and also corresponds to the City's Comprehensive Water Distribution Plan that was prepared in 1996. . . . . . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CONFERENCE ROOM 6:30 P.M. MINUTES R FT 1. CONVENE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Callies, Lizee, Turgeon, and Wellens; and Administrator Dawson Absent: None B. Review Agenda Without objection from the Council, Mayor Love proceeded with the Agenda for the evening. 2. INTERVIEW CANDIDATES FOR CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO THE SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION A. 6:30 P.M. Robert Hensley, 28110 Woodside Road Park Commission B. 6:45 P.M. Steven Loheit, 27915 Woodside Road Park Commission Council conducted with two candidates, Robert Hensley and Steven Loheit, for consideration of appointment to the Shorewood Park Commission for a term of appointment from present date through February 28, 2007, filling the term vacated in May 2005 by Mary Lou Meyer. 3. OTHER No other business was presented this evening. 4. ADJOURN Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, Adjourning the Work Session Meeting of August 22, 2005, at 6:59 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk 1Jf\ " . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MINUTES RAFT 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Callies, Lizee, Turgeon, and Wellens; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown, Finance Director Burton, and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: None B. Review Agenda Lizee moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the Agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Work Session Minutes, August 4,2005 Wellens moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Special Work Session Meeting Minutes for August 4, 2005. Motion passed 5/0. B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, August 8, 2005 Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of August 8, 2005. Motion passed 5/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Lizee moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein: A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Staffing: Authorization to Hire a Senior Accounting Clerk C. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-073, "A Resolution Approving a Temporary Gambling License for the Friends of the Southshore Center." D. Approve Extension of Conditional Use Permit for Gretchen Sebald, 20625 Garden Road E. Authorization for Expenditure of Funds for two 800 MHz. Radios * ~B REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 22, 2005 Page 2 of6 . F. Sign Permit Request for Kay Marie & Carol's School of Dance, Shorewood Village Shopping Center Motion passed 5/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Dick Mueller, Excelsior resident, stated he was present this evening to provide comments to the Council on some issues. Councilmember Wellens had written a recent letter-to-the-editor in an area newspaper. Mueller explained the bandshell in Excelsior Commons had been painted with a flag in 1993 for aesthetic reasons. He also provided information about comments made by Councilmember Wellens regarding planning decisions made by the Excelsior Council that affected the tax base for that City. He shared opinions regarding the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department budget and stated his belief that Excelsior was being asked to contribute double in certain policing requireqments within the budget. He thanked Council for allowing him the time to speak on this issue. 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS . None. 6. PUBLIC HEARING ~. . 7. PARKS A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held August 9, 2005 Engineer Brown reported on matters considered and actions taken at the Park Commission Meeting of August 9,2005 (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). He noted there would be a "Buckthorn Bust" event slated for November 12, 2005, at Freeman Park to educate residents on buckthorn as well as work . to eradicate the buckthorn from the Park. More information would be presented later on this event. Any residents interested in attending should call City Hall for additional information. Engineer Brown also explained the process the Park Commission had undergone regarding the Shirley Rice Memorial to be placed at Manor Park. He briefly reviewed the plans and specifications for the memorial, noting it would be completed by October 2005. B. Acceptance of the Shirley Rice Memorial Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Accepting the Plans and Specifications for the Shirley Rice Memorial Garden as presented. Mayor Love stated he was excited to see the memorial project come to fruition as Shirley Rice was a friend, and he noted the plans seemed a fitting memorial to the family for a wonderful person. Motion passed 5/0. . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 22, 2005 Page 3 of 6 . Councilmember Turgeon stated she would like the Council to discuss the subject of City trails and the trail planning process at a Work Session meeting in the near future. . . . . 8. PLANNING Director Nielsen explained there had not been a Planning Commission meeting since the most recent Regular City Council Meeting; thus, there was nothing to report on at this time. A. Variance to Build on a Substandard Lot Applicant: Craig Buechler Location: 5655 Eureka Road Director Nielsen explained in January 2003 the City granted a variance to Craig Buechler to build a new house on a substandard lot, located at 5655 Eureka Road. Mr. Buechler had not used the variance within the required one-year deadline and the approval lapsed. He had now submitted a similar variance request with slightly different house plans. Director Nielsen then reviewed the case, noting the issues and analysis from the 2002 Staff report were still valid. He stated the recommendation from the previous request included a condition that plans be modified to comply with the maximum impervious surface requirement (33%). The new site plan complied with both setback and hardcover requirements for the R- 1 C district. Proposed hardcover was 32.7 percent. The only issue remaining for resolution was the height of the structure. He explained the applicant's plan illustrated a three-story structure, 36.5 feet in height, and the Code limited residential structures to 2.5 stories and 35 feet. As such, the building should be adjusted to comply with the maximum requirements of the Zoning Code. Staff recommended that the variance request be approved, subject to the applicant revising the plans to comply with height requirements provided in the Zoning Code. Craig Buechler, 5655 Eureka Road, stated he would be happy to answer any questions Council might have of him. Wellens moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-074, "A Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit and Lot Area Variance to Build on a Substandard Lot to Craig Buechler." Motion passed 5/0. 9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. Proposal Regarding SLMPD Interim Funding Administrator Dawson explained at a Work Session meeting on August 4,2005, the City Council had considered several proposals for interim funding of the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department for 2006. These points arose from a proposal by Greenwood Mayor Newman at a July 29 meeting of the SLMPD Coordinating Committee, and subsequent modifications made to it by the Excelsior and Greenwood City Councils in subsequent days. Administrator Dawson then briefly reviewed the "Newman" proposal, a new Excelsior proposal, highlighted changes between the two proposals, and also noted the status of Cities' actions on SLMPD funding for 2006, as well as logistics associated with an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that currently governed all the cities comprising funding of the SLMPD. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 22, 2005 Page 4 of 6 He noted this most recent proposal was endorsed by the SLMPD Coordinating Committee at its most recent meeting with a vote of 3/1, with Excelsior representatives dissenting. Mayor Love stated he had received a phone call from Mayor Newman of Greenwood on this subject in recent days. He also stated he had looked at the draft of this proposal and believed it to be a good simplification of issues, and he noted the proposal remained silent on the baseline funding issue; however, he encouraged endorsement by this Council of the proposal. Councilmember Callies questioned whether subsequent reiterations and changes would be allowed to this proposal in the future by Excelsior. Administrator Dawson noted there was a special meeting slated for the Excelsior City Council with interim funding on its agenda; however, he also stated the JP A dictated a September 1,2005, deadline for setting funding levels. Mayor Love stated he hoped all four cities would endorse funding levels presented; however, should only three cities do so, he anticipated several courses of action would follow rapidly, with the situation being resolved through legal action or with all four cities moving forward.together. Turgeon moved, Callies seconded, Accepting the Newman proposal as presented. Motion passed 4/1, with Wellens dissenting. Councilmember Wellens stated he had voted against the proposal because he did not see anything that had changed substantially since the last vote on this subject. B. Park Commission Appointment Administrator Dawson explained the Council had earlier held interviews with two candidates for an opening on the Park Commission. Callies moved, Wellens seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-075, "A Resolution Making Park Commission Appointments, appointing Steven Loheit, 27915 Woodside Road, to a term to go through February 27, 2007". Motion passed 5/0. On behalf of the City, Mayor Love thanked all both residents for their interest in applying for this position. 10. ENGlNEERING/PUBLIC WORKS A. Accept Proposal and Award Contract for Dry Hydrant Relocation Engineer Brown stated Michel Catain, 4550 Enchanted Point Road, had submitted a petition for local improvement, in accordance with the Minnesota State Statute 429, requesting that the City perform an engineering analysis and public works improvement project to relocate a dry hydrant that was located on the subject parcel via a utility easement. Mr. Catain requested the hydrant be relocated outside the current easement on his property. Council had undertaken the appropriate actions to proceed, and this evening was being asked to accept a proposal and award a contract for such relocation. . . . . Engineer Brown also explained that since Mr. Catain's legal representative had not yet had an opportunity to review this proposal, nor had the desire of the applicant been confirmed with this proposal . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 22, 2005 Page 5 of 6 . that would be at his expense, he was requesting that Council approve this action subject to approval by the applicant. Councilmember Turgeon questioned the process and responsibility of funding for this project. Engineer Brown explained that process. Wellens moved, Turgeon seconded, Accepting the Proposal and Awarding Contract for Dry Hydrant Relocation, subject to applicant's and legal representative's approval, to G.F. Jedlicki, Inc., in the amount of $47,960.00. Motion passed 5/0. B. Update on the Right-of-Way Acquisition for County Road 19 Engineer Brown reported this update would be given as part of the update in Item 10C. C. Update on Costs for County Road 19 . Engineer Brown shared information regarding the costs incurred as part of the County Road 19 Intersection project to date. He noted the construction costs totaled approximately four million dollars currently, and noted it was a daily challenge to ensure additional requests for costs were handled and contained. As an example, he cited the recent issue created by a lack of removal of power poles by Xcel Energy in a timely manner that the general contractor was identifying as an increase in project costs. . Councilmember Turgeon thanked Engineer Brown for providing this data, however, she requested additional data be provided demonstrating the breakdown of costs incurred by the City on this County project. Engineer Brown stated he would provide an amended tally to the Council at the next Regular Council meeting. 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff . 1. County Road 19 Intersection Engineer Brown thanked the Council for supporting efforts to remove the power poles as part of the recent construction project challenges. He reported the power poles to be gone and noted many positive reports had been received regarding the new "look" without them. He stated efforts would continue to focus on roadway loading issues, as there was a great amount of work to be accomplished in the next eight weeks. B. Mayor & City Council Mayor Love reported he would be attending the Excelsior Fire District Governing Board meeting on Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 7:00 P.M. at the West Side Station. 12. ADJOURN . Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of August 22, 2005, at 7:44 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 22, 2005 Page 6 of6 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary . Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8:00 PM or Immediately Following Regular Council Meeting NUNUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION D T Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:55 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Callies, Lizee, Turgeon, and Wellens; Administrator Dawson; Engineer Brown, Finance Director Burton, Planning Director Nielsen, and Deputy Clerk Panchyshyn Absent: None B. Review Agenda Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda for the meeting. He requested Item 4, An Update on a Phone Call Received, be added to the Agenda for the evening. . Wellens moved, Lizee seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0. 2. DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) 2006-2010 BUDGET . . Administrator Dawson explained the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Years 2006-2010 would be discussed this evening. He then outlined the purpose, process, and suggestions for the CIP that the Staff had undertaken in recent months. Engineer Brown explained the CIP with regard to various projects as part of the Equipment Replacement, Land Open Space Acquisition, Local Street Reconstruction, Municipal State Aid Streets, Municipal Water System, Parks, Public Facilities/Office Equipment, Sanitary Sewer, and Stormwater Management budgets. Engineer Brown recommended the City began to reVIew and standardize the process for street reconstruction projects. After a brief discussion, Council indicated preference for removal of amounts toward certain projects in the CIP from Park Foundation contributions. Engineer Brown reviewed specific items for consideration as part of the CIP for the City parks. He noted a "spotlight" should be kept on the Freeman Park Wetland Restoration Project in the CIP for future years. Finance Director Burton reviewed the revenue sources for the CIP for Council. Mayor Love thanked Staff for its efforts in collaboration for the CIP and noted they had done a wonderful job of preparation and planning this report. #<Rc, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 22, 2005 Page 2 of2 3. DRAFT 2006 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET . Administrator Dawson provided an overview of the draft of the proposed 2006 General Fund Operating Budget. He noted recent actions by the State Legislature regarding levy limits, Market Value Homestead Credit, the City's tax base, general trends in the budget preparation, and various highlights, including salaries and insurance, transfers to the Capital Improvement Funds, Public Safety, Public Works/Engineering, Municipal Facilities, Improvements to Document Retrieval System, other technology improvements, and Park Programming. Discussion ensued regarding various aspects of the 2006 General Fund Operating Budget. With regard to the Public W orks/Engineering discussion, Councilmember Turgeon requested monies be designated for training purposes on various operations for Staff prior to any installation of any bay and lift being constructed in the Public Works facility. She also requested the staffing vacancy in the finance department be reviewed to determine if the position could be dispersed into other positions for cost saVIngs. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Love thanked Staff for its insight, preparation, and planning for all . future events. 4. AN UPDATE ON A PHONE CALL RECEIVED Mayor Love stated he had received a phone call from former Justice Tim Gilbert who had been retained by the Shorewood Yacht Club for mediation purposes with the City. Mayor Love stated he explained he would recuse himself from all future discussions on this matter, and directed Mr. Gilbert to contact . Administrator Dawson and Planning Director Nielsen for information needed in the future. 5. ADJOURN Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, Adjourning the Work Session Meeting of August 22, 2005, at 9:25 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary . Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . . PAY ABLES APPROVALS For 9/12/05 Council Meeting . Approved by: Craig Date: (J'1 ~8 !o~ , ~ . wson, City A ministrator . . -:/I: ~B A- . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM . DATE: TO: FROM: CC: September 8, 2005 Mayor and City Council Jean Panchyshyn, Deputy Clerk ~~ Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk RE: MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE TEMPORARY LICENSE FOR WINE TASTING EVENTS The Shorewood Wine Club has several wine tasting events scheduled through May of 2006. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 340A.401, the State's Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division requires Shorewood Liquor to have a Temporary Liquor License for events held at off- site facilities that do not carry a liquor license. . Three of the wine-tasting events will be held at the Southshore Center at 5735 Country Club Road. As the Southshore Center does not hold a liquor license, a Temporary License is needed by Shorewood Liquor for the following wine tasting event dates: Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 7:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. Wednesday, January 18, 2006, 7:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. Wednesday, May 10, 6:00 P.M. - 8:00 P.M. Shorewood Liquor has completed the temporary liquor license applications for the three events to be held at the Southshore Center. A copy of the license application and corresponding resolution are attached. COUNCIL ACTION 1) 2) 3) Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Shorewood Liquor for September 14, 2005; . Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Shorewood Liquor for January 18, 2006; Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Shorewood Liquor for May 10, 2006. n ~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER +/-- .';< /) --It" ,J C.... " Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 444 Cedar Street Suite 133, St. Paul MN 55101-5133 (651) 215-6209 Fax (651) 297-5259 TTY (651) 282-6555 WWW.DPS.STATE.MN.US . . APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRlNT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION ~ ~1't..WCe L ~ . l.A.cr STREET ADDRESS ;'~blo \~~ NAkfE OF PERSON MWNG A. LICA TIONj2 , '. -:1... \J cr'\ ~\"u&.'\~d~'i txi\()le C::V(1el, DATES LIQUOR WILL BE SOLD q - /4-- {)5 ORGANIZATION OFFICE~.. 'SS_N NAA1ME t,-tC . S\Dr~, vViN ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME DATE ORGANIZED IQ5Co CITY 'S l, or- et.J liJJ BUSINESS PHONE (4~~ Lt - b <6{, 1 TAX EXEMPT NUMBER N/A ~ ZIP CODE DRESS 51~~ CCJ1,urrtrc ADDRESS S Df'i . ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS Location license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe s ou\lshp~ c.&rt\fV\\J.I\J1 ~el';.."" Ce,,\ tr . ) 5135 COl.t-I1t-rV Club t<.c1 !;hv(l!-.UL1)Oc!/ r>~tJ55 33) Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor service? If so, give the name and address of the liquor licensee providing the service. f\ln Will thl( applic~nt carry liquor liability insurance? If so, pI.ease provide the carrier's nam:: and amount of coverage. , ':)-\ r ,<y\ '\ re..IltC!\er.s j:l S"'~j 1'.:'0 :~n I ",,,,v, ."'J IH~:III :.....I~~y APROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT 'N/A . LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL APPROVED DIRECTOR ALCOHOL AJ"ID GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address . above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the License for the event PS-09079 (02/05) . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 340A.40 1, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division requires an application and permit for a temporary liquor license for Municipal Liquor wine-tasting events; WHEREAS, said Department provides that an applicant shall complete an application for a temporary on-sale liquor license for approval by the City; WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfactorily completed an application for the issuance of a temporary on-sale liquor license; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: That a temporary on-sale liquor license be issued to Shorewood Liquor, for its wine tasting event on September 14, 2005 from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., at the Southshore Center, 5735 Country Club Road. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. ATTEST: Woody Love, Mayor Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DMSION 444 Cedar Street Suite 133, St. Paul-MN 55101-5133 (651) 215-6209 Fax (651) 297-5259 TTY (651) 282-6555 WWW.DPS.STATE.MN.US . APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE DATE ORGANIZED \Cl5to TAX EXEMPT NUMBER Nit STATE ZIP CODE r'\ rJ -55 ~ ~ \ S~PHONE 'ili.f"'3;).3~ (q,'1.) ~ M U-111 U Ct..! L-; -(,LG r ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME C-l-M. of Sh()(.fi/,J-Dod ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME RESS 5155 {!f9'Unff'l Cluh /.d, ShoreuftY1J! In ADDRESS .E:53 3 } ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS Location license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe S ou\lslo~ C'P\fV\V.I\J ~el\~..r' tel' tl 5135 CfJUyiffl Cf"Lh ~cl 0/r){5'(t~dl M S> 3 3 J Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor service? If so, give the name and address of the liquor licensee providing the service. ~o . . Will the appli~t carry: liquor liability insurance? Ifso, please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. ~\. rG1.u.\ \t~lI~l(r.s ji 5to~,NO $l."..u, .,~ bc."\:lv :....,l~,.y APROV AL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT N/A LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL APPROVED DIRECTOR ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address . above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the License for the event PS-09079 (02fOS) . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 340A.40 1, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division requires an application and permit for a temporary liquor license for Municipal Liquor wine-tasting events; WHEREAS, said Department provides that an applicant shall complete an application for a temporary on-sale liquor license for approval by the City; WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfactorily completed an application for the issuance of a temporary on-sale liquor license; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: That a temporary on-sale liquor license be issued to Shorewood Liquor, for its wine tasting event on January 18, 2006 from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., at the Southshore Center, 5735 Country Club Road. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. ATTEST: Woody Love, Mayor Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DMSION 444 Cedar Street Suite 133, St. Paul:MN 55101-5133 (651) 215-6209 Fax (651) 297-5259 TTY (651) 282-6555 WWW.DPS.STATE.:MN.US . APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION S f) e..WCI2 L~' l.A.cC STREET ADDRESS ~ ~ b 1 0 ,~ t.-> 1- NAME OF PERSON MAjfING APPLICATION \J 01'\ ~VS"'I\.<l~\j DATES LIQUOR WILL BE SOLD 5 - . 0 -0 to ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME C It D f ShDr tu:co& ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME DATE ORGANIZED \q5 () CITY 'Shorei.,JoJJ BUSINESS PHONE ("'l~ ~ - (, <6b 1 F ORGANIZATION TAXEXEMPT~BER N/\ RESS 6156 LD /..,Ltf.f-y CJ K. b f({)({ J I S n Of e t,(J ADDRESS m 5'53 I ZIP CODE USi ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS Location license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe s ou\lslo~ c..&P\I"\IJ.I\J1 ~el\:..r c..el\\ 1(" " 5 735 COuntrv ~/IA. h 1\4 Sho(el),J-tJ-Od, YVlt0 5>331 Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor service? If so, give the name and address of the liquor licensee providing the service. ~ . . {) . Will th~ applic~t carry liquor liability insurance? If so, please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. <5-\ \a.u.\ \ttlo..llfl\er"s J1 Stoi),no ~n,,,~!). mJ bc.~~lv :""I"4./"Y APROV AL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT N/A f LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL APPROVED DIRECTOR ALCOHOL Ai'lD GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address . above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the License for the event PS-09079 (02105) . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 340A.401, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division requires an application and permit for a temporary liquor license for Municipal Liquor wine-tasting events; WHEREAS, said Department provides that an applicant shall complete an application for a temporary on-sale liquor license for approval by the City; WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfactorily completed an application for the issuance of a temporary on-sale liquor license; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: That a temporary on-sale liquor license be issued to Shorewood Liquor, for its wine tasting event on May 10, 2006 from 6:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M., at the Southshore Center, 5735 Country Club Road. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. ATTEST: Woody Love, Mayor Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: . FROM: DATE: RE: . Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works September 8, 2005 A Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for 2005 Pavement Marking and Radisson Road Improvement Projects. Attachment 1 is the Bid Tabulation for the 2005 Pavement Marking and Radisson Road Improvement Projects. Bids were opened and tabulated on August 29,2005. The low bidder is AAA Striping Service Company in the amount of$9,888.98, compared to the engineer's estimate of$13,500. . Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution that accepts the bids and awards the contract to AAA Striping Service Company in the amount of$9,888.98. A break down of the project bid is as follows: Project No. 05-06 (2005 Signing and Striping) Project No. 05-07 (Radisson Road Street Improvements) $ 8,633.48 $ 1,255.50 A resolution is attached for the City Council's consideration. . tt= 3D n t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER City of Shorewood Bid Tabulation 2005 Signing and Striping and Radisson Road Improvements City Projects 05-06 and 05-07 . Bids Opened: 3:00 P.M. August 29, 2005 Engineer: WSB and Associates, Inc Ji:nl~.\{:;llilill.I~!lliil[il\'i~llil~II.I.i.II!111111\~llilllll'illllliliilllillllllillll\illli!il!!i 1 AAA Striping Service Co. 2 Traffic Marking Services, Inc. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 En ineers Estimate $ $ 9,888.98 10,698.30 $ 13,500.00 I hereby certify that this tabulation is a correct and true representation of the bids received on this date for this Improvement Project G ~, .. Larry Brown City Engineer 1. e . os Date .---? #/~ Steve Gurney, WSB & Associates, Inc. 9/1/0')" Date . Attachment # 1 . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05- - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2005 PAVEMENT MARKING AND RADISSON ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for local improvements designated as 2005 Pavement Marking and Radisson Road Project, City Project Nos. 05-06 and 05-07, bids were received, opened on August 29,2005 and tabulated according to law, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that AAA Striping Service Co. is the lowest bidder in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council ofthe City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with AAA Striping Service Co., in the name of the City of Shorewood, Project Nos. 05-06 and 05-07, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Administrator/Clerk. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12th day of September 2005. Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM DATE: September 6, 2005 . TO: Mayor and Council Members Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk ~ RE: A Resolution Proclaiming November 12-19 as Housing Awareness Week 2005 FROM: . Intercongregation Communities Association (ICA) has requested the City consider a resolution proclaiming November 12-19 as Housing Awareness Week 2005. This is a statewide campaign for safe and affordable housing for all people. A draft resolution proclaiming November 12-19 as Housing Awareness Week 2005 is enclosed for Council approval . . #3E ,,11- '..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SHOREWOOD . RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 12-19, 2005 TO BE HOUSING AWARENESS WEEK 2005 WHEREAS, the lack of safe, decent, and affordable housing destabilizes the lives of families and individuals, negatively impacts the health and school performance of children and the health of elderly, and contributes to homlessness; and WHEREAS, the Intercongregation Communities Association (lCA) provided approximately 122 (a 3 7% increase) emergency housing assists in 2004 to prevent homelessness; and WHEREAS, Housing Awareness Week 2005 is a community initiative to raise awareness . about local housing issues, to raise money to address housing needs, and to promote community involvement and volunteerism. Congregations, service organizations, youth groups, community residents, businesses, schools and civic organizations are participating in Housing Awareness Week 2005; and WHEREAS, public, private, and non-profit partnerships play an essential role in the development and preservation of affordable housing; and . WHEREAS, Housing Awareness Week 2005 coincides with National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council does hereby proclaim November 12-19,2005 to be Housing Awareness Week 2005, and encourages all residents to participate in activities associated with Housing Awareness Week 2005. . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, this 12th day of September, 2005. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works . DATE: September 8, 2005 RE: Acceptance of Proposal- Professional Geotechnical Services - City Hall Site. As part of the ongoing analysis to determine the viability of the existing City Hall basement structure, and to explore the remainder of the site from a geotechnical and groundwater viewpoint, Staffhas solicited a proposal from American Engineering and Testing, Inc. Services requested are to include four geotechnical borings, document groundwater conditions, and provide calculations and recommendations as to acceptable foundation. Attachment 1 is the proposal provided by AET. Staffwas very pleased with the proposed contract amount of $3,900. lf approved, this will be funded by the Public Facilities and Office Equipment fund of the Capital Improvement Program. . Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of a motion that accepts the proposal provided by American Engineering and Testing, Inc. for geotechnical engineering services for the City Hall site. 1f3F n t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I) AMERICAN . ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. CONSULTANTS . GEOTECHNICAL i . MATERIALS i . ENVIRONMENTA~ September 8. 2005 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood. MN 55331 Attn: Larry Brown I I I I I Per your September 7 request, we are submitting this Letter Proposal for the following scope: i I Scqpe I I Fieldwork I . Drill four standard penetration test borings at the site to depths of 21' . I . Place temporary PVC casing (or hollow stem auger casing, depending on conditions) u1 the first three boreholes drilled to allow longer term. water level measuring during the day of the fieldwork. Remove casing and backfill the holes prior to leaving the site. . Clear underground public utilities through the Gopher State One System. . Measure and document the boring locations and surface elevations. Laboratory . Conduct soil index testing ($160 budget). Report . Logs of test borings, including descriptions of drilling, test and classification methods. I · Review of soil/groundwater conditions encountered and of pertinent soil properties. i . Recommendations for possible foundation types, depths and allowable bearing capaci1:)1 (to be within assumed or given tolerable settlement levels); grading procedures to prepare structural areas; suitability of on-site soils for re-use as fill; floor slab support" estimate of modulus of subgrade reaction and moisture/vapor protection needs; building backfilling with drainage comments and estimates of lateral earth pressures; pavement subgrade preparation and estimated R-value; and pavement section thickness designs. RE: Proposal for Geotechnical Services City Hall Site, Country Club Road & Echo Road, Shorewood Dear Mr. Brown: This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North. St. Paul, MN 55114 .651-659-9001 . Fax 651-659-1379 Duluth. Mankato . Marshall. Rochester. Wausau . Rapid City. Pierre. Sioux Falls AN Af'rIRMATIVE ACTION AND EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . . . . . Attachment # 1 ~ . . . . . Larry Brown September 8,2005 Page 2 of2 The scope of work defined in this proposal is intended for geotechnical purposes only, and not: to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination at the site. However, we \; will note obvious contamination encountered. I Fee I Our services will be performed on a time-and-materials basis per the attached fee schedule. ' For the scope described, we will establish $3900 as a not-to-exceed fee. In the event the scope of our work needs to be revised, we will review such scope adjustments and the associated fees with you, and receive your approval before proceeding. Schedule Based on our current backlog, we anticipate being able to conduct the fieldwork within two : weeks of authorization. The report should then follow the field work by about two weeks. I Terms/Conditions Our services will be performed per the "Contract Agreement Between the City of Shorewood and American Engineering Testing, Inc. For Professional Services," dated September 13,; 1999. Accejltance I Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by endorsing the enclosed copy and returning . it to us. The original proposal is intended for your records. Remarks If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1n~!i~ Vice President, Geotechnical Division Phone #651-659-1305 Fax #651-659-1347 jvoyen@amengtest.com PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE BY: Signature: Printed Name: Date: Attachments : 2005 Geotechnical Fee Schedule i 2005 GEOTECHNICAL FEE SbmD'lJLE . 1. En~eerintzlTeclmical Personnel Rates 2. Diamond Bit - Metamorphic & Igneous A. Word Processing Specialist SO.OO/hr a) B, NQ 17.00/foot B. Drill Technician/Lab Technician 72.00/hr b) HQ 20.00lfoot C. Senior Engineering Technician 77.00lhr D. Engineering Assistant 86.001hr IV. Laboratory Tests of Soil E. Engineer I1Geologist I 92.00/hr .Tests subcontracted to SET F. Engineer WGeologist n lOS.OOIhr A. Water Content 13.00/test G. Senior Engineer/Geologist 117.00lbr B. Dry Density (Includes water content) 4S.00/test H. Principal Engineer/Geologist 141.001hr C. Atterberg Limits (ASTM:D4318) 1. Plasticity Index 96.00/test n. Vebicle Mileal!e 2. Uquid Limit or Plastic Limit 70.00/test A. Personal Automobileffruck O.SO/mile Separately B. Auxiliary Truck O.68Jmile D. Shrinkage Limit (ASTM:D427) . C. I-ton Truck with Drill Rig O.881mile E. Sieve Analysis (includes -#200) BO.oo/test D. 1111-ton to 2'h-ton Truck with Drill Rig I.03/mile F. Hydrometer Analy.sis (sieve included) 220.oo/test E. CPT Truck Rig (20-ton push capacity) 1.l4/mile G. Specific Gravity (ASTM:D8S4) . F. Tractor/Lowboy Trailer US/mile H. Hand PenetrometerlTorvane 10.00/test 1. Unconf'med Compression 67.oo/test m. Site ExPloration EquiDment Rental J. Consolidation - Primary Consolidation . A. Drill Rig Rental Curve up to 32 tsf (ASTM:D243S) . 1. Rotary Drill on 4WD I-ton Truck 54.oolhr K. Direct Shear Test . 2. Rotary Drill on 2WD 1111 to 2~-ton Truck 63.00/hr L. Triaxial Compression Test . 3. Rotary Drill on All- Terrain Vehicle 93.oo/hr M. Pcnneablllty Tests . 4. Portable, Non-rotary Rig 63.00/hr N. Tests of Expansive Soils . B. Auxiliary Vehiele Rental 13.SOIhr O. Electric Resistivity 7S.00/test C. Cone (CPT) Rig/Equipment Rental P. Organic Content of Soli 68.00/test 1. CPT Truck Rig (20-ton push capacity) 114.001hr Q Topsoil Borrow Test (MnlDOT 3877) 3OO.00/test 2. All-Terrain Rig (10-ton push capacity) 93.001hr R. R-value (Hveem Stabllometer) 320.00/test 3. Electronic Cone or Piezocone w/Computer 33.001hr S. California Bearing Ratio 4. Soil Sampler 3.00/hr 1. Granular SSO.OO/test . S. Water Sampler 2O.00lhr 2. Cohesive 620.00/test D. Geotechnical Equipment Rental T Miscellaneous 1. Field Vane Shear 26O.00/da)' 1. nun-wall Samples (extrusion only) 2S.00/tube 2. Inclinometer Reading Equipment 270.00/day 3. Pneumatic Transducer Reading 13S.00/day V. EXDeDSeS Equipment (pore pressure, settlement A. Direct Project Expenses: includes out-of- Cost + IS% or earth pressure) town per diem; plowing & towing; special 4. Bore Hole Permeability materials & supplies; special travel. a. Open End Casing Method 9S.00/day transponation & freight; subcontracted b. HQ Wirellne Packer 26O.00/day services. and miscellaneous costs . S. Borehole Pressuremeter 4S.00/hr B. Equipment Replacement (when abandonment Cost 6. Iowa Borehole Shear Tester 29S.00/day is more feasible than recovery) 7. Double Ring Infiltrometer 20S.00/day C. Equipment Recovery (when requirecl by Cost + 15% 8. OPS Mapping System Equipment 12.00/hr regulatory agencies or project specifications) 9. Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) 620.00/day 10. Auxiliary PDA Equipment VI. Emert Witness Service Rates a. Generator 37.00/day A. Litigation Preparation 183.oo/hr b. Calibrated SPT Rod lSS.OO/day B. Deposition or Court Time 226.00lbr E. Geotechnical Software Rental (4-hour minimum) 1. Finite Element (seepage or deformation) SS.OO/hr 2. CAPW AP 30.00lhr The rates Ilresented are ponal-to-ponal with vehicle mileage, expenses and 3. Wave Equation lS.00lhr equipment rentals being additional. 4. L-PI1e lS.00/hr S. Slope Stability lS.00/hr Overtime for persolUlel charged at above cost plus 2S % for over 8 hours per 6. Stabilized Earth Slopes & Walls lS.OO/hr day or Saturday; and at above cost plus SO% for Sundays or Holidays. F. Bit Wear Hazardous work charged at an additional2S%. Night time shift work will 1. Diamond Bit - Sedimentary Rock include a premium charge of $30.00 per person per shift. a) B. NQ 10.oo/foot b) HQ 12.00/foot OlDPM021(01/OS) i AMERICAN ENGINEERING TE~G, INC. . I.. . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD P ARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY HALL 7:00 A.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION DRAfT The Park Commission began its discussion at 7:06 a.m. A. ROLL CALL Present Chair Davis; Commissioners Famiok, Young, Westerlund, and late arrival Wagner; and City Engineer Brown Absent Commissioner Moonen was absent B. REVIEW AGENDA Item 2B Park Foundation report and 2C Shirley Rice Memorial Garden were added to the agenda. 2. MUSIC IN THE PARK Farniok reported that there were approximately 100 people at the final Music in the Park series event. While there were fewer numbers present, she indicated that the band was entertaining. Overall, she felt there had been a nice variety of music over the summer. Chair Davis commented that the arboretum had learned through experience that by appealing to younger children and families, attendance increases. She questioned holding the June concert later in the month to ensure more reliable weather next year. She also commented that she had a contact with someone in an orchestra whose group performs show tunes and musical numbers. The Commission agreed that expanding the children's programs would be a good idea. While he agreed that appealing to youth and families by adding an additional kids program was a good idea, Brown reminded the Commission of the huge draw Big Walter had earlier in the summer and suggested the Commission focus on a high quality program list. Proposed dates for 2006 included June 23, July 21, and August 18 for the adult concerts; June 14 and July 19 for the kids series with the latter held at Freeman and Manor. Young asked whether the arboretum had a traveling activities program that could be rotated to various parks over the summer as an alternative to music. In addition, he encouraged Davis to pursue an orchestral group for the adult series as an alternative for the more mature listener. Brown noted that it might behoove the Commission to reserve Big Walter for a second year as an anchor for the series, since it was so well attended and would provide continuity to the program next year. In addition, the Commission could investigate other options such as blue grass, orchestral, etc. With regard 1f1A PARK COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 2 OF 2 to the children's concerts, Brown agreed that tailoring one concert to the preschool circuit and one to the slightly older hands-on age group was an interesting concept. Chair Davis asked Brown to determine whether the budget for 2006 would be the same as this year at $2,000 or be increased to $3,000. B. PARK FOUNDATION With regard to a letter from the Park Foundation which addresses old debt, Chair Davis reported that Foundation member Callies, on behalf of the Foundation, has asked the City to formally forgive the old debt for Eddy Station in order to allow the Foundation to start its fundraising efforts with a clean slate. Brown reported that the Foundation is made up of a different group of people than those who had made the original commitment to donate $10,000 annually towards Eddy Station, and it is their desire that the City allow them to move on. While the City Council forgave the debt in order to reconcile its accounts, the Council hoped the Foundation might still try to satisfy the old debt and live up to its commitment. Young commented that he could see where the enthusiasm of the current Foundation members might be sapped trying to solicit funds for old debt. He stated that he would like to see the Foundation freed of this debt and allowed to move forward in their fundraising efforts. He asked whether the Commission could make a recommendation to the City Council that they take formal action to clear the slate. Chair Davis stated that she got the feeling from the Foundation that they had learned their lesson from that experience. Brown stated that the Commission could make a motion at its next formal meeting. H explained that there was a rather spirited discussion during the Council work session regarding drinking fountains and the Foundation's commitment to participate. Callies urged the City to resist the temptation to plug in numbers or specific dollar amounts with regard to the Foundations level of participation. Chair Davis stated that the Foundation also requested that the Commission or City provide them with information that they could use in their Apple Days booth in order to display what the City is working on with regard to parks. She suggested a display be put together containing the Manor Park water quality study, Freeman Park wetland enhancement project, and buckthorn recruitment for November. Young and Wagner volunteered to serve an hour or more in the booth if necessary during the event. In addition, she asked for volunteers to assist the Foundation with the Art Show in November, presumably early morning set-up. Farniok and Davis volunteered to assist with the Art Show. C. SHIRLEY RICE MEMORIAL GARDEN. Brown reported that the City Council had voted to approve the memorial garden proposal. Farniok stated that the garden club would move forward. Chair Davis indicated that the Foundation had requested that either the Garden Club or City maintain the plazas annual garden as well. J . . . . Farniok stated that the garden club is a small group of people who would probably not be able to accommodate the request. She suggested the Foundation plant perennials in order to eliminate the need . for ongoing maintenance. . ~ . . . . . PARK COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE30F2 Young suggested that the City or Foundation contact the nearby seniors and ask them if they'd be willing to maintain the garden. Chair Davis stated that she would contact the seniors, since she wished to discuss the buckthorn project and other items with them. 3. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned their meeting at 7:55 a.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson Recording Secretary ~ . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Bailey; Commissioners Conley, Gagne, Gniffke, Meyer, and Woodruff; and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Commissioner White and Council Liaison Wellens . APPROVAL OF MINUTES · August 2, 2005 Gagne moved, Conley seconded, Approving the August 2, 2005, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes as presented. Motion passed 6/0. . 1. DISCUSS SIGNAGE ISSUES Director Nielsen explained that for several months he had sought to provide clarity regarding signage issues within the City's ordinances as part ofthe Work Program for this year. He stated upon review he believed the ordinances to be in need of slight revisions without significant overhaul. To that end, he explained, he wanted to provide the Commission with a slide presentation regarding different aspects. of signage for contemplation with additional discussions to follow at a later meeting. He stated the purpose of signage was to provide identification of businesses and certain pieces of property. In addition, aesthetics played a . role in signage and should work to prevent visual clutter. Director Nielsen then reviewed 28 different photos and noted several components of signage within each picture. Next, he reviewed the current City ordinances and proposed suggestions for change. Discussion ensued regarding how best to enforce or regulate signage issues with businesses that would not adhere to current sign ordinance regulations. Discussion also ensued regarding appropriate sizing of signage for various buildings and structures. The Commission indicated consensus for allowing administrative approval to prevail on temporary and permanent sign permit requests rather than being routed through the City Council approval process. Director Nielsen stated additional information would be presented and discussed on these topics at the September 20, 2005, Study Session Meeting of the Planning Commission. 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR . There were no matters from the floor presented this evening. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 2005 Page 2 of 2 4. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA Director Nielsen stated there were three public hearings regarding a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space Over 1200 Square Feet, Rezoning from R-1A, Single-Family Residential to R-2A, Single or Two- Family Residential, and Rezoning from C-3, General Commercial, to R-1C, Single-Family Residential, as well as a request for Minor Subdivision and a Minor Subdivision/Combination slated for the September 6, 2005, Planning Commission Meeting Agenda. 5. REPORTS . Liaison to Council Director Nielsen reported on matters considered and actions taken at the August 22,2005, Regular City Council Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). · SLUC Director Nielsen announced the topic for the next meeting of the Sensible Land Use Coalition (SLUe) would be "Ke/o v. New London, Conn.". Interested Commissioners were encouraged to submit registration forms promptly. · Other There was no other business presented this evening. 7. ADJOURNMENT Woodruff moved, Gagne seconded, Adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of August 23, 2005, at 9:00 P.M. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Sally Keefe Recording Secretary ~ . . . . . . . :.nia Woods Final Plat 005 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 9 September 2005 RE: Lake Virginia Woods - Final Plat FILE NO. 405(05.11) . . Pernsteiner & Associates has submitted the final plat for Lake Virginia Woods, a thirteen lot residential development at the west end of Smithtown Road. The plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat that was approved earlier this year. Engineering comments are included under separate cover in a memorandum from Steve Gurney, dated 6 September 2005. Recommendations from the Planning Department are as follows: 1. The applicant's engineer must sign the plans and specification documents. 2. The applicant's landscape architect must provide and sign a final tree reforestation plan. 3. The applicant must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion or title commitment for review by the City Attorney. ,4. The applicant must provide a plan showing the location of wetland buffer monuments and including legal description for a conservation easement. n to., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER :r/ r.? 4 Memorandum Re: Lake Virginia Woods Final Plat 9 September 2005 . 5. The applicant must provide a deed for the wetland buffer conservation easement. 6. The applicant must provide protective covenants for the property that include the wetland restrictions set forth in the development agreement. As of this writing, the proposed development agreement does not contain a provision relative to water charges. This will be provided at the Council meeting Monday night. Cc: Craig Dawson Tim Keane Larry Brown Terry Pernsteiner . . . . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF LAKE VIRGINIA WOODS WHEREAS, the final plat of Lake Virginia Woods has been submitted in the manner required for the platting of land under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City of Shorewood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. The plat of Lake Virginia Woods is hereby approved. 2. The approval is specifically conditioned upon the Developer recording the Development Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof as Attachment 1. 3. The Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are authorized to execute the Certificate of Approval for the plat on behalf of the City Council. 4. The final plat, together with this resolution, and the Development Agreement shown as Attachment I shall be recorded within sixty (60) days ofthe date of certification of this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12th day of September 2005. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK -D-R-A-F-T- CITY OF SHOREWOOD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKE VIRGINIA WOODS THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 2005, by and between the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City", andPemsteiner & Associates, a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". WHEREAS, the Developer has an interest in certain lands legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, which lands are hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"; and WHEREAS, Developer proposes to develop the Subject Property into thirteen (13) single-family residential lots; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application for a preliminary plat for the property with the Zoning Administrator, which preliminary plat was considered by the Planning Commission at their meeting held on 7 June 2005, and at a meeting of the City Council on 25 July 2005; and WHEREAS upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council did consider and grant preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the Developer has filed with the City the Final Plat for "Lake Virginia Woods", a copy of which plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and guarantees contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Conditions of Approval - The Developer shall comply with the conditions of approval as set forth in Shorewood Resolution No. 05-066, attached hereto as Exhibit C. In addition, development of the property is subject to the requirements of the R-IA/S, Single- Family ResidentiallShoreland zoning district. (01) Minimum setbacks (for all structures) shall be as follows: (a) Front: (b) Rear: (c) Side minimum/total: (d) Side yard abutting a street: (e) Wetland buffer/Setback: 50 feet 50 feet 10/30 feet 50 feet 35/15 feet . . . . . 1 Attachment I . . . . . (02) Maximum building height, as defined by the Shorewood Zoning Code, shall be two and one-half stories or 35 feet, whichever is less. (03) The Developer shall comply with the requirements of Shore wood's wetland code (Chapter 1102) and the Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991 [Minn. Stat. 103 G.221 et. seq. (hereinafter referred to as the WCA)]. It is the intent of this agreement that areas adjacent to wetlands be maintained in their natural state. (a) A minimum 35-foot buffer strip shall be maintained adjacent to all wetlands. (b) Natural vegetation shall be maintained in wetland buffer strips. Where disturbed by site development, wetland buffer strips shall be restored with natural vegetation. (c) Wetland buffer strips shall be identified within each lot by permanent monumentation approved by the City. The Developer shall provide to the City a map showing the location of proposed wetland monuments and a conservation easement over the wetland buffer area. (d) A monument is required at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer strip and as necessary to establish required setbacks from the wetland buffer strip. Monuments shall be placed within 60 days of completion of site grading or prior to issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. (e) The Developer shall record with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles, a notice of the wetland buffer requirement against the title of each lot with a required wetland buffer strip. (f) No structures, including, but not limited to, decks, docks, patios, and play equipment may be located in the wetland buffer strip or the required wetland setback area, except that fences shall be allowed within the wetland setback area. (g) No artificial obstructions, including, but not limited to, decks, docks, patios, and play equipment may be located within the wetland area. No cutting of wetland vegetation or dredging shall be allowed within the wetland area. 2.) Improvements Installed by Developer - Developer agrees at its expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials and equipment in connection with the installation ofthe following improvements: (01) All site grading including building pad correction where needed; (02) Street grading, stabilizing and bituminous surfacing; (03) Surmountable concrete curb and gutter; (04) Sanitary sewer; (05) Water main laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances; 2 (06) Storm sewer and surface water drainage facilities; (07) Street name signs and traffic control signs; (08) Required tree preservation, reforestation and landscaping; consistent with the plans and specification prepared by Otto Associates, dated 19 August 2005 , and received and approved by the City Engineer. It is understood that underground utility lines, including gas, electric, telephone, and television cable shall be installed by the respective private utility companies pursuant to separate agreements with the Developer. 3.) Final Plat. Grading. Drainage and Utility Plan. Building Plan - The Developer has filed with the City Clerk the final plat titled Lake Virginia Woods for the development of the Subject Property. Said plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Said final plat, together with the grading, drainage, and utility plans, referenced in paragraph 2 above and this Development Agreement, is herewith adopted and approved by the City. 4.) Pre-construction Meeting - Prior to the commencement of construction, Developer or its engineer shall arrange for a pre-construction meeting to be held at Shorewood City Hall. Such meeting shall be coordinated with the City Engineer and shall include all appropriate parties specified by the City Engineer. 5.) Standards of Construction - Developer agrees that all of the improvements set forth in paragraph 2 above shall be constructed and installed in accordance with engineering plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer and the requirements of applicable City ordinances and standards, and that all of said work shall be subject to final inspection and approval by the City Engineer. 6.) Materials and Labor - All of the materials to be employed in the making of said improvements and all of the work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good and workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed the quantities and qualities required by the approved plans and specifications, and shall be subject to inspection and approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld if the materials and work are consistent with the plans and specifications and the standards set forth herein. In case any materials or labor supplied shall be rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then such rejected materials shall be removed and replaced with approved materials, and rejected labor shall be done anew to the reasonable satisfaction and approval of the City at the cost and expense of Developer. 7.) Schedule of Work - The Developer shall submit a written schedule in the form of a bar chart indicating the proposed progress schedule and order of completion of work covered by this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the work set forth in paragraph 2, except the final lift of asphalt, shall be performed to be completed by 1 November 2006. The final lift of asphalt shall be completed by 1 July 2007. Upon receipt of written notice from the Developer of the existence of causes over which the Developer has no control, that will delay 3 . . . . . . . . . . the completion ofthe work, the City, at its discretion, may extend the dates specified for completion. 8.) As-Built Plan - Within sixty (60) days after the completion of construction of the Improvements, Developer shall cause its engineer to prepare and file with the City a full set of "as-built" plans, including a mylar original and four (4) black line prints, showing the installation of the Improvements within the plat. Failure to file said "as-built" plans within said sixty (60) day period shall suspend the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy for any further construction within the plat until the documents called for herein are filed. 9.) Easements - Developer, at its expense, shall acquire all easements from abutting property owners necessary to the installation of the sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and surface water drainage facilities within the plat, if and to the extent required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and thereafter promptly assign said easements to the City. 10.) Pre-existing Drain Tile - All pre-existing drain tile disturbed by Developer during construction shall be restored by Developer. 11.) Staking. Surveying and Inspection - It is agreed that the Developer, through its engineer, shall provide for all staking and surveying for the above-described improvements and delineation of the wetland buffer areas. In order to ensure that the completed improvements conform to the approved plans and specifications, the City will provide for resident inspection as determined necessary by the City Engineer. 12.) Grading. Drainage. and Erosion Control- Developer, at its expense, shall provide grading, drainage and erosion control plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Said plans shall provide for temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices, including seeding of graded areas, as reasonably necessary, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedimentation and erosion of lands and streets within and outside the plat during all phases of construction. Developer shall keep all streets within, and adjacent to, the plat free of all dirt and debris resulting from construction therein by the Developer, its agents or aSSIgnees. 13.) Street Signs - Developer, at its expense, shall provide standard city street identification signs and traffic control signs in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as directed by the City Engineer. 14.) Access to Residences - Developer shall provide reasonable access, including temporary grading and graveling, to all residences affected by construction until the streets are accepted by the City. 15.) Occupancy Permits - The City shall not issue a certificate of occupancy until all Improvements set forth in paragraph 2, except the final lift of asphalt, are completed and approved by the City Engineer. 4 16.) Final Inspection - At the written request of the Developer, and upon completion ofthe Improvements set forth in paragraph 2 above, the City Engineer, the contractor, and the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection ofthe work. When the City Engineer is satisfied that all work is completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and the Developer's engineer has submitted a written statement attesting to same, the City Engineer shall recommend that the improvements be accepted by the City. . 17.) Conveyance of Improvements - Upon completion of the installation by Developer and approval by the City Engineer of the improvements set forth in paragraph 2 above, the Developer shall convey said improvements to the City free of all liens and encumbrances and with warranty oftitle, which shall include copies of all lien waivers. Should the Developer fail to so convey said improvements, the same shall become the property of the City without further notice or action on the part of either party hereto, other than acceptance by the City. 18.) Replacement - All work and materials performed and furnished hereunder by the Developer, its agents and subcontractors, found by the City to be defective within one year . after acceptance by the City, shall be replaced by Developer at Developer's sole expense. Within a period of thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the said one-year period, Developer shall perform a televised inspection of all sanitary sewer lines within the plat and provide the City with a VHS videotape thereof. 19.) Restoration of Streets. Public Facilities and Private Properties - The Developer shall restore all City streets and other public facilities and any private properties disturbed or . damaged as a result of Developer's construction activities, including sod with necessary black dirt, bituminous replacement, curb replacement, and all other items disturbed during construction. 20.) Reimbursement of Costs - The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs, including reasonable engineering, legal, planning and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection with all matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the . within Agreement and the performance thereof by the Developer. Such reimbursement of costs shall be made within thirty (30) days of the date of mailing ofthe City's notice of costs to the address set forth in paragraph 28 below. 21.) Claims for Work - The Developer or its contractor shall do no work or furnish no materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Agreement, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as provided in the specifications. Any such work or materials which may be done or furnished by the contractor without such written order first being obtained shall be at its own risk, cost and expense. 22.) Surety for Improvements - Deposit or Letter of Credit - For the purpose of assuring and guaranteeing to the City that the improvements to be constructed, installed and furnished by the Developer as set forth in paragraph 2 above, shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this Agreement, and to ensure that the Developer submit to the City as-built plans as required in paragraph 8 and that the Developer pay all . 5 . . . . . claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this Agreement, the Developer agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City in an amount equal to 150% of the total cost of said Improvements estimated by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Said deposit or letter of credit shall remain in effect for a period of one year following the completion of the required improvements. The deposit or letter of credit may be reduced in amount at the discretion of the City upon approval by the City of the partially completed Improvements, but in no event shall the deposit or letter of credit be reduced to an amount less than 125% of the cost of the remaining Improvements. At such time as the Improvements have been approved by the City, such deposit or letter of credit may be replaced by a maintenance bond. Any letter of credit shall contain language stating that the Developer's lender shall, 30 days prior to the expiration ofthe letter of credit, notify the City by certified mail that the letter of credit will not be renewed. 23.) Insurance - The Developer shall take out and maintain public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors, or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. This insurance policy shall be a single limit public liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000.00 and shall remain in effect until the improvements set forth in paragraph 2 have been accepted by the City. The City shall be named as additional insured on said policy and the Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City. Prior to commencement of construction of the Improvements described in paragraph 2 above, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate of such insurance as will protect the Developer, his contractors and subcontractors from claims arising under the workers' compensation laws of the State of Minnesota. The insurance coverage required hereby may be supplied by the Developer's contractors and subcontractors, thereby satisfying the requirements of this section. 24.) Laws. Ordinances. Regulations and Permits - Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of all regulatory bodies having jurisdiction of the Subj ect Property and shall secure all permits that may be required by the City of Shorewood, the State of Minnesota, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services before commencing development of the plat. 25.) Local Sanitary Sewer Access Charges (LSSAC) - Developer shall, prior to release ofthe final plat by the City, make a cash payment to the City in the sum of $15,600 ($1200 for each lot) as local sanitary sewer access charges. 26.) Park Fund Payment - Developer shall, prior to release of the final plat by the City, make a cash payment to the City in the sum of $26,000 ($2000 for each lot) for the Park Fund. 27.) Tree Preservation Measures - The City has adopted a Tree Preservation Policy ("Policy") which has been incorporated into the City Code. In addition to the Policy, the 6 Developer has prepared and the City has reviewed a detailed tree preservation plan prepared by , dated , 2005 ("Plan"). . The Developer agrees that the tree preservation measures provided for in the Policy and in the Plan are the responsibility ofthe Developer, and that the Developer shall also be responsible for any acts of its subcontractors or agents which are in violation of either the Policy or the Plan. As partial security for its obligation under this paragraph 27, the Developer agrees that prior to the issuance of each building permit, it will provide for two thousand dollars ($2000) in cash or letter of credit per lot to be deposited with the City as security for such obligation. 28.) Notices - All notices, certificates and other communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, with proper address as indicated below. The City and the Developer by written notice given by one to the other, may designate any address or addresses to which notices, certificates or other communications to them shall be sent when required as . contemplated by this Agreement. Unless otherwise provided by the respective parties, all notices, certificates and communications to each ofthem shall be addressed as follows: To the City: Zoning Administrator CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . With a Copy to: Shorewood City Attorney c/o Leonard Street & Deinard 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55345 To the Developer: Terry Pernsteiner, Pernsteiner & Associates 11022 Tanglewood Lane, LLC Champlin, MN 55316 . 29.) Proof of Title - Developer shall furnish a title opinion or title insurance commitment addressed to the City guaranteeing that Developer is the fee owner or has a legal right to become fee owner of the Subject Property upon exercise of certain rights and to enter upon the same for the purpose of developing the property. Developer agrees that in the event Developer's ownership in the property should change in any fashion, except for the normal process of marketing lots, prior to the completion of the project and the fulfillment of the requirements of this Agreement, Developer shall forthwith notify the City of such change in ownership. Developer further agrees that all dedicated streets and utility easements provided to City shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 30.) Indemnification - The Developer shall hold the City harmless from and indemnify the City against any and all liability, damage, loss, and expenses, including but not . 7 . . . . . limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from or out of the Developer's performance and observance of any obligations, agreements, or covenants under this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer, the Developer's contractors or subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person, firm or corporation whomsoever, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this Agreement or the performance and completion of the work and Improvements hereunder. 31.) Declaration of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions - Developer shall provide a copy of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, which Declaration shall include the City as a signatory thereto, for review and approval by the City prior to recording. 32.) Remedies Upon Default - (01) Assessments. In the event the Developer shall default in the performance of any of the covenants and agreements herein contained and such default shall not have been cured within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Developer of written notice thereof, the City may cause any ofthe improvements described in paragraph 2 above to be constructed and installed or may take action to cure such other default and may cause the entire cost thereof, including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense incurred by the City to be recovered as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, in which case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of such assessment within thirty (30) days after its adoption. Developer further agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in full any such special assessment within the time prescribed herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of Developer's real property within the Subject Property for any amount so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mechanic's liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of an emergency, as determined by the City Engineer, the notice requirements to the Developer prescribed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety, and the Developer shall reimburse the City for any expense reasonably incurred by the City in remedying the conditions creating the emergency. (02) Performance Guarantv. In addition to the foregoing, after notice and failure to cure, the City may also institute legal action against the Developer or utilize any cash deposit made or letter of credit delivered hereunder, to collect, pay, or reimburse the City for: (a) The cost of completing the construction of the improvements described in paragraph 2 above. (b) The cost of curing any other default by the Developer in the performance of any ofthe covenants and agreements contained herein. 8 (c) The cost of reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expenses incurred by the City in enforcing and administering this Agreement. . (03) Additional Remedies. Notwithstanding any other remedy available to the City under this Agreement, the City may elect to proceed under this paragraph to remedy a violation of Developer' s obligations under paragraph 27 hereof. (a) Upon discovery of an apparent violation of the Plan or Policy, the City will notify the Developer in writing of the violation. The notice will contain a description ofthe circumstances constituting the violation, the provision of the Policy or Plan which is apparently violated, the steps which must be taken to correct the violation and the date by which the compliance must occur. (b) If compliance has not occurred within such time, or if the violation, by virtue of its repeated nature, seriousness or other factors are such that a penalty may be appropriate, the matter will be scheduled for a hearing by the City Council at a meeting not sooner than ten (10) days following the date on which written notice is mailed to the Developer. . (c) Following the hearing, the Council shall render its decisiop. in writing. If the Council determines that the Plan or Policy has been violated, (whether or not the violation has been corrected) it may take some or all ofthe following actions: . (i) impose a monetary penalty of not more than $1000 for each violation. (ii) order that the Developer stop work on all construction for which building permits have been issued; and withhold the issuance of additional building permits until it has received assurances satisfactory . to the City that no future violations of the Plan or Policy are likely to occur. (iii) take any other actions or enforce any other remedies available to it under this Agreement, the Policy or the City Code. (03) Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing, the City may institute any proper action or proceeding at law or at equity to abate violations of this Agreement, or to prevent use or occupancy of the proposed dwellings. 33.) Headings - Headings at the beginning of paragraphs hereof are for convenience of reference, shall not be considered a part of the text of this Agreement, and shall not influence its construction. 34.) Severability - In the event any provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not . 9 . . . . . invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof, and the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 35.) Execution of Counterparts - This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 36.) Construction - This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 37.) Successors and Assigns - It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER CITY OF SHOREWOOD By: Its: By: Its: Mayor ATTEST: City Administrator/Clerk 10 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of , 2005, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Woody Love and Craig W. Dawson to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk of the municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2005, by Terry Pernsteiner, , Pernsteiner & Associates. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Shorewood Planning Department REVIEWED BY: Leonard Street and Dienard 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (TJK) 11 . . . . . . . . . . (insert Existing Legal Description - Exhibit A) 12 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF LAKE VIRGINIA WOODS . WHEREAS, the final plat of Lake Virginia Woods has been submitted in the manner required for the platting of land under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws ofthe State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City of Shorewood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VEDby the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. The plat of Lake Virginia Woods is hereby approved. . 2. The approval is specifically conditioned upon the Developer recording the Development Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof as Attachment 1. 3. The Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are authorized to execute the Certificate of Approval for the plat on behalf of the City Council. 4. The final plat, together with this resolution, and the Development Agreement shown as Attachment I shall be recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of certification of this Resolution. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record . forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12th day of September 2005. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: . CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK } . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM Date: September 8, 2005 . To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Bonnie Burton, Finance Directortrreasurer ~ Larry Brown, Public Works Director ~ From: Re: Capital Improvement Program (ClP) for Years 2006 - 2010 Craig Dawson, City Administrator Gb CC: . INTRODUCTION Enclosed for your review is the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the Years 2006 - 2010. The CIP has been reviewed and revised by staff and Council during several work-sessions over the past few months. The ClP is typically the first step in the budget process, with identification of specific capital expenditures which will direct the efforts of the 2006 budget. As Council will recall, the approach taken in developing the ClP is that it is intended to be a flexible document, and an important physical as well as financial planning tool. The first year of the CIP is most definite in terms of planning and implementation. The latter years of the CIP are most subject to change. A recommended fiscal policy section is located at the beginning of the document to assist in setting priorities for projects. CIP HIGHLIGHTS Council will recall the following highlights: . Numerous water system enhancements are contemplated for 2006, some of which are continuations of projects begun in 2005. . A Public Works Addition (bay with lift) is contemplated for 2006, with completion scheduled for 2007, and other information technology upgrades are programmed for the Public Facilities/Office Equipment fund for 2006. . Numerous projects are programmed for the Local Street Reconstruction fund, including bituminous overlays, retaining wall and guardrail replacements, and pavement reclamation projects. n t.~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER # 9A i Memo - CIP 2006-2010 Page 2 . . The Municipal State Aid Roadway fund will be exhausted by the Smithtown Road rehabilitation project in 2006 and an advance for the City's portion of the County Road 19 intersection. The ClP reflects the advance and repayment of these MSA funds. . The Sanitary Sewer fund annual allocations for Inflow & Infiltration Reduction projects was increased from $25,000 to $50,000 beginning in 2006. . The Stormwater Management fund allocates $30,000 annually starting in 2006 for drainage . projects and it also reflects the Gideon Glen improvements. . The Land and Open Space Acquisition fund continues to receive annual contributions of $5,000 from the General Fund. The CIP does not automatically commit the Council to implement any of the projects listed in it; it is a planning document to focus resources and a document for financial planning. Individual projects are to be approved in the annual budget process and later authorized for purchase or award of contracts according to standard operating procedures. . RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution accepting the 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program. . . . \ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE YEARS 2006-2010 WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Council wishes to carefully plan and coordinate City public capital purchases and projects over a five-year period matching physical needs with financial resources; and . WHEREAS, City Staff has prepared and presented a proposal for a five- year Capital Improvement Program to facilitate the planning and coordination of projects for the years 2006-2010. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Capital Improvement Program for the period of 2006-2010. . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. Woody Love, Mayor . ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I I I I . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us C'APIT AL IMPROVEMENT, .P'ROGRAM Calendar Years 2006 - 2010 September 2005 n t..J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2006-2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND POLICY..................................... 1-8 II. TABLES A. Department Summary......... ................ ................. ............. ...... ............ ........11 B. Projects by Department ........................................................ ..............12 -14 C. Sources of Revenue. ............................................. ..... .......... .......................15 D. Projects by Department and Funding Source ................................16-19 E. Projects by Funding Source with Balances ....................................20-23 III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS A. Equipment Replacement Fund ................................................................. 27 B. Land & Open Space Acquisition .............................................................. 37 C. Local Street Reconstruction .............. .............. .............................. ..........41 D. Muni ci pal State Aid Streets ............ ......... ...................... ........... ..............51 E. Munici pal Water System.... ...................... ........ ............... ......................... 55 F. Parks.... ................................................... ....................................................... 63 G. Public Facilities and Office Equipment .................................................. 71 H. Sanitary Sewer System ...................... ............ ............. ........ ...... .............. 77 I. Stormwater Management.. ............ ........ .......... ....... ................. ................. 83 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us September 12,2005 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, Introduction It is our privilege to present to you the 2006 - 2010 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Shorewood, MN. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a coordinated schedule of municipal capital projects, improvements, and purchases for the years 2006 through 2010. It consists of project proposals that include the project title, scheduled year, and the funding sources for each project. It identifies sources of revenue to pay for the planned capital project improvements and purchases. The Basics At its essence, a CIP is a planning tool for some specified period of time. The CIP lists significar'lt (hence the term "capital") improvements in infrastructure and equipment that the City should plan for. It becomes a financial planning tool that identifies funding sources and funding availability, and helps decision-makers to determine affordability. . With the approval or amendment by the Council/the CIP provides an implementation program for staff to work on. The League of Minnesota Cities' Handbook for Minnesota Cities contains the following discussion of Capital Improvement Budgeting. "Capital budgeting is a list of needed capital improvements, their order of priority, and the means of financing them. Besides being one of the major tools of planning, a capital budget can provide some or all of the following advantages: ,VY ~ \') PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ..", 3 .. - - - - -0 , o , -+ (\i' IA o o o c , CTQ~ ~ :3 , 0- () ~ IA H <0'"0 (\i . ::s- iii . :E~:s ~c~ Q ~ Q :s 0 O--hg- o -h 0 ::s- :;. c Q Q 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ _. :3 o..~ ;: Q -+ ~ IA -< -+ -g..~. :;. -<OIA 1Ae..-+ S' -< g --h~ o -. o ~ H :s -+ 0--< -. ~ iii' ::!: Q ..... o , .... :3 IA IA IA :s :s -+ Q -ho"g :;. -+ ::s- Q ::s- 0 ~ ~ -+ o' -h 0 C -h o -+ :s o c ~ :3 ' ~ O-~O- =+ IA o' a iii' Q :s 0- o ::r Q :s l.O ~ IA H' -+ IA o ::r ~ 0.. c ~ o -h :s -+ ~ :s 0- ~ 0- -+3 ::r -0 Q , :s-. -+ 0 -+ < ::r~ ~ 3 ()~ H~ '"0 IA - o Q " o :3 '"0 :s 0-' IA o' a: :} -+3. ~, ~ , 0 ~ -+ 0 IA ::rc ~ :3 :3 Q !:!, -+ 0.. ::r ~IA~ -+ ::r 0 O' g .g :s 0- =+ o , Q -h~- :3<CT ~ -. c :E~g -0 -+ ~ ci ::r-+ c-. ~ -0 ~ 3 ci -+QlQ IA :3 , Q :s Q :3 5 3 O-=-h -+-< 0 ::r' , ~ ~ -+ O--+::r ~ -+ ~ - -h ~ 5" 0 o' -+ a :s ::!: :E o 3 5' -h~l.O ~"-+-< ::r::r~ ~ ~ ~ , 0 IA IA 0 .. C ' :s ~ o 3 -, Q ;; 5' ::r-+ o ~ c :s O-ti -+ <' ,~ - - -< " ~ 11 Q 0 , a :E ;:f :;. ~lQ , -+ ~ ::r S iii' 3 -+ 3 ::s- ~ ~ :s CT o-c ~O- _. l.O o ~ :s -+ IA 0 -h :;' -h ~ 0 -h~ -h' ~ , o ~ -+ 0 o CT3 ~ 3 o ~ 3 :s ~ g- -+-0 ::S-, ~ 0 , c-. ~ ~ o 0 o -+ 3 IA 3 cr ~ , :s -+ O-::s- ~ ~ 0-0 -0 0 , 3 o _. l.O :3 cil.O 3 g- o- l.O ~ -+ - ~1O' ~ -i -+::s-o::r ::r -+ lQ ~ ~ 0 ci 0 -o-h3=+ ci :}o-< c-' ~ :s-o ~o-+c ~o::s-it 1A3~3 CT3Q-o ~31A' o -. iii' 0< :s -+ 0- -<_ 0 ~ -+1A-h3 ::r-h-+~ ~ 5' if ~ Q ~ -0 3 :s IA , -0 0 -+ 0 , o' Q c-, ~ IA Q: ~ ~~~it ~ Q ~ :;' :3-+0--+ -+ O' -0 0 -o:S'Q ~ :.. o' o -+ 3. g 0- g ~ ::!: g -< ' ~ O-~:E~ o :3 ::r-< -+O-~~ ::r-+:3Q ~ ::r -+ ' '~::ro -oo~Q , -, 0 -0 o -+ =+ c-, -< 0 Q ~ c_ o ;}:3 _. it 0 !:!. 3 =- :;- ~ i5.0-~0 ~ 0- =S, ~ -h ~ ~ 3 5' -h:E ~ =+~IA:s ~IA=+-+ --:< 0 :;. 3 ~ - - . . . . . -olQ OJ~_HO I::r()3 0 11< m ,c-< :3-h~QQ -h,QIA OQ :3-+o_-o-o-oo~~ti ~ ci a' :;. ~ ~ ~ 5" ~ ci .g -g ~ CT Q :s c Q , 0-' N - < =+ ~ iii' :3 -+ , -+ Q 1ft Q -. ~..... :s::r , ~ -, 5' -+ -+ u; , 3 3 ~ :t. -. ~ ~ lQ (\)-+ Q (\) 9: -0 (\) (\) -< Q Q Q :3'-<':SXQo:S 3-oo::r0-< 0-+--00 , 0 ~ (\) < IA ~ - -0 -.:s :3 -+ (\) (\) 0 3 ' ~~-h~Q::r :3 i5.:E3g- -+ 0 0 Q :;. ~ (\) -, Q c , -, 0 ::!: :s -+ 0 :3 ~ 0 :!.-< 3 :s :s ~ e, 0 it , 0 j 0 (\) IA lQ :s.... :s 3 (\) 3 ......- Q -h a: -, -+ -h 3 IA-o o (\) Q 0- :s:3 Q -, c 0.. -. ,,:S-olQ c " :3:s ~-+ ..... ..... 0-, Q:3 (\) Q CT Q ...... .... 0 -, -0 :s -+ - (\) ::!: ~ ~. q ~ 0 -< -+ -. ti 0 (\) n(\)o g :;' -+ ' 3 -. :3 :2. -+ 0.. , ~ lQ 0 ~ ~ ~ -ho Q IA -+_. (\) -h 3 _ 0 0- , :g 0 , ~ 5' 0 0 l\l :;: Q Q -. -h (\) -+ Q , < 3 \V :S=:3QIA, Q(\)(\):3 0.. lQ=(\)Q a Ol.O:S~ o -0 , -+ lQ 0' -+ :s-+ S Q , !:!. < -. 0 :3 Q , ~. 0 -+ (\) ~ Q_ IA 0.. -0 -0 (\) -+ c-' -< -h -. C ' , -he..(\)o o..og Q O-Q 0 0 c_ _. -+ 1ft ,...... :s ~ - l.O l.O :3 \V 0.. ~ -< ~ ~ -0 IA-o(\)-o ............ --0 Q:3' 0 CT -+ :3 :3 gci :34~~ Cl. ~o :3 < ,..... (\) (\) -0 Q -0 -. (\) (\) ....:s , 0 -0 ' tS:3 :3 ~::!: -< '-+ E ~ (\) -+o:s ...... ~ O:s IA -. lQ :3 O' p :s -h -+ Q (\)..... Q :3 IA -+ -+IA :s1A....:s ' ::r ' 0- Q:3 :s 0 --< :; (\) -. -+ 0 -h 0 l.O -+ Q < (\) c-+ Q::r lQ e.. (\) , =+ I ::r o (\) (\) -, , IA l.O (\) -+ - :3 -+ I Q' 0 C-o 0 (\) -+ -0-0 e.. IA (\i '3 ~::r , (\) IA~(\) (\) 0 ~ 1A:3 ' lQ IA IA -+ , o'::S- 3Q g :s g 0.. - - - - - . . . 0-0 -h' -+ (\) (\) IA :3 ~ , , (\) (\) O-lQ c , o 0 (\) C 0-0 , IA IA IA -+ (\) Q (\) CT~ ~:s t:j. l.O (\)-0 -+ ' ::r ~, ~ ~ -+ 0 Q -+ X IA , , Q Q -+-+ ~ ~ 0- - ~ ~ ~ -0 -+ ::r (\) -0 C CT 0' :;. -h o , 3 ~ 0- o -h -h C -+ c , (\) :3 ~ ~ 0- alA :E Q :s g 0- -+-0 ::s-' ~ ~ -0 (\) 3. ~ ~ 0 =+g -< :3 iii' !:! . -+3 (\) :3 CT ~ , IA -h , o :3 - U\ (\) -0 -+ ~ :3 CT ~ , N o o U1 I '"0 Q lQ ~ N n H '"0 -I , Q :s IA :3 -+ -+ e.. r (\) -+ -+ (\) , - - (Y) t.. a! a! Ol +- 0 +-0- a! I ....1m 00 +-0 ~N E t.. V! a! c.o o E t.. a! I-+- 0- 0.. I-f a! UVl - - - ~ 0- a :-2 tj > .~ 0 ~ a! 0- ~ .- ..c -v+- tj~a!c V!..,Q...s::::.c - +-+- ~ $! ~.~ '- 0 .0 U V! c +- a! a! 0 V ..c c ._ a! +- .~ 1;.'0' ':iE 0 t.. a ,-0 0. -+-ot.. o.vV!..,Q t.. 0 +- :J a! ,+-.- V +-co+- V! I-f +- t.. o t.. 0 E c .2 a. ~...!2t..oc t.. 0- a. V! ...!2 o a! 0- V! 0- a. > I-f a! ft' 'V!- U s:: a! ..s: c a! :J .~ +- a!..c a! ~ V!..c+-ca! 1::~~-8~ a! a..~ E t.. ~~~oo. o-Ut..-O~ E .V! .;! ~ U .- ~ a! E ~ .~ .~ ..c o U c +- t.. ft' 0 .~ ..c Ol ... '- ..c +- 0...s:::V!+- s:: t.. +- .~ a! ~ .2 a. '+- E .~ +- Q..+-OE+-c a.~Evog~ E E 0 t.. V! o t.. Ol a.'Vi \J ~ ~.~ s:: s:: o t.. s:: .- 0 Q) t.. 0. s:: ..c v -;f: 0. S::...!2 Ol.~ "0 .~ .2 0. g a! C .::t:. +- .V! ..c .0 tJ t.. +-0 ~ +- 0 o +--+- Q..a.~utJV! lj ~ ~ 0 '0 6 Q) +- _ +- s:: a! _V!0.0:J0. ..... E...s:::oo.. I- < .- +- v 0 - - VI +- .~ 0 I a! ..c > .~ 0 ..c ~ a! Ea! E o 8Vl al .0 +- V! o E o a! E o Vl t.. o a! VI ]~ s:: V al a! a!..c .a+- E. a! .~ o ~...s::: t.. ..c +- OlVl~ o +- t.. s:: -0 0.. a! a! a! E E i: :!:: ...!2 ,+-Ea. o E a! a.:VlO~ Ht..V...s::: utJ...s::: a! v ~ o ~.- ~ .~ t.. ..c E a! ~ +- +- +- s:: s:: V! g 0 a! ~a!V!E al...s:::t s:: ..r: +- a! ~ +- .~ '0' > V! t.. g. +- :? a. ...., ~ v ~'+- .., a! _ 0 o .., c V! t..oo+- 0.. a a! 's;: (', '+- -0 -0 :J Q.. 0 a!.2 t.. lj 1:: .5 g ~ a! '+- '- +- Q)+-a!-oo -;f:x-os::+- a! ..!.. 0 0 ,5; a!;::: ,..c ..c,+-a!+- Q) +- 0 g-VI "c+-v+- :JO..2V1~ U t.. -0'" C a! 0 al 0 vi H '+- Ol +- t.. ft' '+- s:: '- a..:!: o ~ '_ E a! t.. +- .... .5 := -0 0 +- V! 0 ft' :J-o tJ a! +- ... - s:: .s:: +: s:: 5 v :J ~ '- 0 E x 0 ;>u v a!.o - - - +- :J 0 .8 +- oq-.~ V! a! +: s:: >o..J ._ .2 +- s:: +- s:: :J o a! +- +- E 5 v s:: 0.. a! t.. a. 0.. a! 0 ~ > +- v ~ 0 +:'+-i: .!!2 0 0 o V! V! a! +- t.. s:: s:: ...s::: :J ~ +- t.. 0 .~ ~ ~ V! +- s:: -00 a! a!,+-...s::: a! 0 ~ S::VI"":: ~~t .~ .-,.- o~'::-o a! 0..!!2 .~ t..a!-O~ .~ i: -g 1:: .o+-...s:::a! EVV!:-2 o a! t.. V '+- a! a! a! +-.0 o t.. 0 c +--o~o -0 ' v a!:i~V! a. 0 c +- ..2...s::::J v a! V! 0 a! > ~ U .., a! a! s:: ~ -0 ...s::: '- a. a! I- g-~ .0 s:: +- -0 V! s:: U - ~ al g :J I ~ ..c ~ '0 V! -0 I- s:: O-cO~ H alD t.. U a.s:: 0 <~:iES - - o a! E ~N g ~'+- .~ +- 0 +- 0 ,+-:Jo1V! o.o+- al a! t.. V i:~o.,ga! -0 s:: :J V! '0- s::~ E1:;o o x O...s::: .~ ~a! a!+-+- .0 ~:E == 'i: VI +- 0 v +-'+-1:;..ct.. ~o..cV!o .., E +- ~ '+- OOa!O-o t.. t.. t.. E a! 0.. Ol :J .+-_ V!:J '+-O~ V! o t.. 0 t.. '- V!a. Oa! t;1::~ .0 -a!-o-oo t.. E a! a! +- oa!Et..-o v a! VI o+-a! a! ~ 0- al i: s:: -5a!.os::~ a! t.. s:: '- .... ..c +- 0 0 E v s:: v Ol_ V! a! +- V! t.. E s:: 7- a! al 0.. a! s:: +- ..c ':; E ~ 0 +-o-a.ov o a! ':; -0 '+- VI c 0--0 +- al 0 a! s:: ~ .~ ',+-:J V -o~o'+-+- ~E~1::~ a. 0 '- a! E e-x~Ea. .... a! VI a! '- ~ 5 .~ g ~ s::' u.. g g- t.. '0 C a! t.. g 1::0...s:::+-~ N+- s:: I S .- +- a! a! s:: 5 0 E .~ o ...s::: :E .e- '+- ...: Va! :J:-s:: O-E~g-~al H+: 'a!vE '" VI +- 0.. ft' t.. t....c ..... ,- ...00+-.......:J .s:: a! a! c al 0- I- ~ ~._ -0 al - - 111-0 +- al U +- Q) v ,~ 0 o s:: ct al ~ ~...!2 ;: a! "O+- tJ 0 o +- a.Vl - c. 0 g al L. Ea!'+- t.EV!:J~~ '- -0 al a! V!E5>i: +- :J ... al V t.. t.. ~ al -g a! 0 .., al 't +- E o t.. t.. +- :J t..a! v-o 0. '+- +- al s:: -0 a! :J .., a! o t.. 0 .0 t.. ...s::: :J a! ~O~V!'+- a! >:. ~ VI a! V 0:: '- t.. s:: 0.. V! -0 tJ go-gat; '+- +- 0 0- a! ~ .0 H :J ~ 0 ~u g- VI ~ ~ :? t.. --' .~ al -0 '- c c +- > 0 s:: 0 0 '0 '- 0 V '+- t.. V! V! +- 5 a "a! t 1:: g '+-...s::: :J a! al .V! ~ +- VI '''-0 o VI 0 '- v ~ al .- t.. V! >t..>-o.a!S:: ~ 0 0 al t.. g a!EE...s:::1;v s:: Ol +- a! o s:: V! -0 t.. ..c .- al al a! +- -0 .~ +: .- .0 a! :J '- '+- E <t- +- 0- v .- 0 Oal ,+-:J al t.. al ~ s:: -0 t..v Ol g' -0 +- 0 c 0 .- s:: t.. N '0 ...s::: ~ .~ ~ 8 s:: v .s:: '- ~ N .~ ~ ~~ ~ s:: '+- .- V! I +-alV 0 s::...s::: a! 0 (Y) a! +-..c :- E...s:::+-alo V! +- +- ;.::, .5 V!SoE..c a!>..c of- V! +-:J'- V! -0 == o-o-occ -ala!a!o .2 t..:"Q t.. +: v :J > a! .- a! o-o't;~ a. al t.. ... ... V!t..o..t..o.. - - - - U') - - . Projects in Shorewood's CIP are listed with particular care in terms of the likelihood that they will be implemented in the first or second year of the program. . Projects listed in years three through five of the program identify projects and opportunities that merit further evaluation. . There are programs for on-going outlays for which individual projects are not well-defined at this time. For instance, the City has a pavement management program to assess the condition of local streets, and it is updated every year. It is appropriate to budget $95,000 for bituminous overlays each year without listing specific streets after the first year. . Placing a project or outlay in the CIP does not commit the City Council to accomplish it. The Council's normal processes of authorizing studies to be prepared and gaining public comment need to be followed. A CIP listing does not in any way imply a done deal or a foregone conclusion. A CIP helps to keep needs in front of the Council and helps it set priorities. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CIP Transmittal Letter September 2005 - Page 4 There may be an incentive to list many projects, or have a general plan for roadways with an annual outlay for them, within the CIP. The law is not clear that a road project needs to be constructed in the year of financing; rather, the project(s) or outlays simply need to be listed in the CIP. If projects or outlays are not listed, the CIP could be amended as necessary to qualify them roadway bonds. Some additional roadway-related projects that were added to the CIP for 2006 include retaining walls and guardrails for: Linden Drive, Excelsior Boulevard near Footprint Lake, Spring Circle, and Maple Lane. Approaches in Developing the CIP Council has developed a philosophy about what is to be included when a CIP is presented. The following points, subject to Council modification, are part of that understanding. Respectfully submitted, L~I)(~.'-~ I Bonnie Burton VLawrence Brown I Finance Director/Treasurer Director of Public Works I I I 6 ~ ..... ...J o Q. ...J < \..) V) ..... u. ~ Z w ~ w > o at. Q. ~ H ...J < I- ..... Q. < \..) - - ~ :t o Q.. ..J ~ Ci. W Z w (.!) s:: o t... -0 0 a> ~ -0 Vl s:: a> +- a> ::J..s:: s:: ..s:: 0 +- a> +- ~ t... E ~VlO+- o ID +- +- a> > s:: H 0 s:: a> s:: t... E ~ g a> Oft Vl s:: a> > ::{ IDa>~ou Vl E '0 +->-.::; Vl a> E .- t... c:J > t... a> a ~ +-~.~ Vl a.. s:: t... 3: Vl E a> a.. a> t .- E a> s:: a>~a>~~ i:i: ';:7 g ..s:: 0 a> 'OJ - - t... E a..= 0 E a> c:J t... t... ..s:: Vl c:J 0 t... Vl .::; t...~OVlo O'l >-~ E t... ~ c:J -0 a> a.. a.. a.. a> +- a> Vl ~ .~ ~:E ~>-::JVlt... a> +- g- O'l 0 E;.: t... .!:: Vl a>..o+-+-E > c:J s:: .~ a> o Vl a> x +- a.+- E a> Vl .- +- >- E-oVl~Vl H s:: a> 0 O'l -a c:J ~ ~ s:: +- Vl .- s:: +- .- -0 a> a> Vl g- ~ t... 'u X Us::t\i=.a> VlVl..s::~~ =0- +-a>o o ~ >--0 s:: o '- U a> 0 3: s:: ;.: Vl a> ::J 0 c:J ~ t... E a.. a> c:J oEa>t...a.. .s::: 0 .s::: U x V) U +- s:: a> - - - - - Vl Vl c:J ..0 >- +- t... o .t: a.. O'l s:: ;: o o '4- a> ..s:: +- s:: o -0 a> -0 s:: ::J '4- a> ..0 ~ -a t... a> s:: a> O'l Ul w ~ t-I Ci. o t-I Ci. Q.. (.!) Z t-I a Z ::> u.. 3: Vl -a Vl o a.. o t... a.. O'l s:: -0 s:: a> a.. Vl c:J +- a.. c:J U a> t... c:J '4- a> 3: -0 s:: c:J .s::: +- c:J a> ..I: o ..0 ::J a.. a> ..s:: +- o +- O'l s:: +- ::J :-e t... +- s:: o o t... o '4- >- t... c:J Vl Vl a> o a> s:: Vl +- o a> ....., o t... a.. a> Vl o ..s:: I- E a> +- Vl >- Vl O'l s:: +- Vl x a> s:: c:J s:: '0 +- s:: c:J E o +- a.. (\) ..s:: ..-4 - ';: ..I: U ..I: ;: Vl +- U a> ....., o t... a.. a> Vl o ..s:: I- +- s:: a> o '4- ~ a> a> t... o E E a> +- V) >- V) O'l s:: +- V) x a> s:: c:J a> ~ c:J E 3: +- c:J ..s:: +- V) +- U a> . ...., o t... a.. a> V) o ..s:: I- N - 3: a> s:: t... o ~ E a> +- V) >- V) O'l s:: += V) ~ a> U s:: .::; c:J t... '4- a> o V) s:: t... o 0 Vl >- s:: +- c:J_ a.. .- X U a>~ a> U ..I: .- +-:0 O'l::J s:: a.. 1: ~ ~ s:: a> >- t...- a.. a> a> +- t...~ Vl a.. +- E U 0 a> 0 . ...., o t... t... 0 CLa> a> U ~ .::; ..s:: t... I- ~ (V) """ - - Ul W ..J Q.. t-I \J Z t-I Ci. Q.. (.!) Z t-I Q Z ::> u.. a> ..s:: +- '4- o s:: o b +- s:: a> E ~ CL E a> ..s:: +- s:: t... ~ E o c:J O'lt... O'l -a ~ ..I: Q.. V) Vl V) +- a> s:: a.. a> 'u E s:: a> > t... 0 a..t... O'lE S::H ;: o c:J +- o 'c.. '4- c:J a>U ..I:-o +- a> ~-o .:!:: s:: ::J a> ID E t... E c:J 0 V) U '< ~ - -0 a> +- a.. o -0 c:J a> ..I: +- ..I: +- 3: a> o s:: c:J -0 t... o U U c:J s:: V) +- s:: a> E a> > o t... a.. E E c:J c:J t... +- O'l a.. 0 c:J t... oa.. Vl +- c:J s:: a> a> ~ E c:J a> E > o t... ';: E >-H +- - u.g a> a.. ..I: c:J I-u ..-4 - - a> +- c:J -0 a.. ::J -0 s:: c:J V) +- s:: a> E a> > o t... a.. E H c:J +- a.. c:J U t... o ~ s:: c:J a.. t... c:J a> >- I +- ::J E c:J CL o a> > a> -0 3: >.. >-= +- c:J .- ::J U s:: a> s:: ..s:: c:J I-+- N - E s:: c:J t...V)-o O'l +- a> OVl-o t... 0 ::J a.. 0 o ~-as:: c c a> 0-0 E +- s:: a> a.. c:J > 0 -0 o a> a> t... t... +- a.. ::J U E +- a> H ::J '0' _ LL t... c:J a.. +- +- a> g- ~..o U-o= ::J '- 1..03: +- O'l V) '4- . !:: 1: o +- a> +- c:J E s:: t... a> a> a> > E a.. 0 o t... g- -a a..E - ::J a> s:: ~ s:: c:J ~ -0 c:J +- Vl a> a> c... c:J +- ..s:: c:J 0 c:J+-U~ s:: '4- ;: 0 -0 0 a> '4- ~ 1: s:: +- o a>..s:: ~ OE:!::-o c... ;: ::J ';: ~ -0 ..0 a> a> s:: ~.~ b 0 U -0 'u t a> ..s:: 0 t... ..s:: +- V) a> 1-3:~g- (V) - - '" - - " . H 3 -c - ~ . 3 (II) ~ ::s -+ Q -+ -. 0 . ::s / H ::s ~ a 0 ~ ~ ::s Q ~ III iii' .." 00 0 - 0-0 -. c.... Q n AI - . n III -< .... :tQ ~ ::s .." III c.. - Q ::s 0"0 AI _ "0 < Q o AI ::s =O'::s !:t "tJ :;. Al3\C III AI ::s A- ... ~ - C' III Q AI a. -f "1 Q ::s III "tJ 0 4- a o' ::s " :r -< ::2 -"n ~. Q 0 n Q n 3 0 ::s =3 :+c I ::s -. ::s -. AI -. m ::s 11I';< n l.Q ~ 0 ~ ~ :s -t 0 "'0 2. Q 0 n n "tJ c I -+ a (J) -. ... n o' 0 en ::s n - ~ "'0 <"1 Q 0 _ "tJ C AI AI "1 11I';< "'0 ~3: AI Q ::s "1 ...~ -. AI e..... III ..oil .." - Q ::s :s -. ::s l.Q H ::s < ~ ::s -+ o ., -< .." r("'l )).0 z;: Z.." H7:J Zm Ci'J: .."m 7:JZ Otn ("'lH m< tnm tn ------------------- 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I I I I I Department Equipment Replacement Land & Open Space Acquisition I Local Street Reconstruction Municipal State Aid Streets I Municipal Water System Parks I Public Facilities/Office Equip Sanitary Sewer I Stormwater Management I I I I I I I I I I Monday September 12, 2005 Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota DEPARTMENTS~RY 2006 2010 thru Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 285,778 105-,522 53,533 273,308 43,360 761,501 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 1,067,800 343,000 411,000 261,000 261,000 2,343,800 4,053,200 104,000 4,157,200 1,119,000 22,000 22,000 21,045 100,000 1,284,045 115,500 447,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 602,500 159,000 3,667,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 3,856,250 192,000 148,000 141,000 50,000 50,000 581,000 125,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 7,122,278 4,787,772 702,533 655,353 608,360 13,856,296 11 I Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Guardrail-Spring Circle LR-06-05 0 24,000 24,000 I Relocate Retaining Wall-Maple Ln/Shady Island LR-06-06 0 22,000 22,000 Beverly Dr Pavement Reclamation LR-07-01 0 82,000 82,000 Street Reclamation Projects LR-07-02 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 I Bracketts Rd Pavement Reclamation LR-08-01 0 150,000 150,000 Local Street Reconstruction Total 1,067,800 343,000 411,000 261,000 261,000 2,343,800 I Municipal State Aid Streets Vine Hill Road - Mill and Overlay MSA-OS-Q5 0 104,000 104,000 I CR 19 Intersection Realignment MSAOS-06 0 3,981,200 S,981 ,200 Yellowstone Trail- Bit Overlay MSA-04-Q1 0 72,000 72,000 I Municipal State Aid Streets Total 4,053,200 104,000 4,157,200 I Municipal Water System Wood haven Well Interconnect with Chanhassen W-OS-05 0 174,500 174,500 Water Meter Radio Read Project W-OS-OS 0 210,000 210,000 Amesbury Polyphosphate System W-04-08 0 12,100 12,100 I Amesbury Well Controls Replacement W-05-02 0 75,000 7S,000 Boulder Bridge Submersible Well - Pull & Inspect W.OS-QS 0 21,000 21,000 I S.E. Area Lineshaft Well. Pull & Inspect W-06.01 0 22,000 22,000 Interconnection of Amesbury & SE Area Wells W.07-01 0 626,400 S2S ,400 Amesbury Lineshaft Well. Pull & Inspect W-07-02 0 22,000 22,000 I Boulder Bridge Well #2 . Pull & Inspect W.09-01 0 21,045 21 ,045 Water System Improvements W-10-01 0 100,000 100,000 I Municipal Water System Total 1,119,000 22,000 22,000 21,045 100,000 1,284,045 Parks I Park Improvements P.04.0S 0 5,000 S,OOO 5,000 5,000 5,000 2S,OOO Badger Park - Resurface tennis courts P-OS-Q1 0 20,000 20,000 Badger Park-Football and Hockey Lighting P-OS-02 0 45,000 45,000 I Silverwood Park-Erosion Control P-06.0S 0 8,000 8,000 Skate Park-Equipment Rehabilitation P.06.04 0 S,500 S,SOO I Minnewashta Dog Park. Matching Funds P.06-05 0 5.000 5,000 Freeman Park.Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station P-QS-OS 0 12,000 12,000 Skate Park.Drinking Fountain P-QS~07 0 12,000 12,000 I Manor Park-Manor Park Pond WA Quality Improvements P.OS-08 0 5,000 S,OOO Cathcart Parks-Resurface Tennis Court P-07 -01 0 14,000 14,000 Freeman Park-Wetland Enhancement/Interpretive Cen P.07-02 0 428,000 428,000 I Skate Park.Plaza Picnic Area P-08.01 0 25,000 25,000 Parks Total 115,500 447,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 602,500 I Public Facilities/Office Equip Computer Upgrades PF-OS.06 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I Civil Defense Sirens PF-05-05 0 25,000 25,000 Network (Computer) Upgrade PF-06-01 0 17 ,250 17,250 I MII/ulay Septembl'/' 12. 2005 13 I Capital Improvement Program I City of Shorewood, Minnesota SOURCESOFREVENUES~ARY I 2006 thru 2010 I I Source 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Donations 42,800 8,333 51,133 Equipment Replacement Fund 285,778 105,522 53,533 273,308 43,360 761,501 I G.O. Bonds-2007 wI City Hall 60,000 3,640,000 3,700,000 General Fund 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 I Grant Money 342,400 8,334 350,734 Local Street Reconstruction 1,067,800 343,000 411,000 261,000 261 ,000 2,343,800 I Met Council Grant Money 70,000 70,000 MSA Advancel(Repay) -181,000 -181,000 -181,000 -543,000 I MSA Funding 72,000 104,000 176,000 Municipal Water Fund 125,100 22,000 22,000 21,045 100,000 290,145 Park Foundation Donations 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 I Park Fund 93,500 14,000 8,333 115,833 Public Facilities/Office Equipment 89,000 27,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 146,250 I Sanitary Sewer Fund 192,000 148,000 141,000 50,000 50,000 581,000 Stormwater Management Fund 55,000 72,800 30,000 30,000 30,000 217,800 I Water Revenue Bonds.2005 1,010,900 1,010,900 Total 2,960,078 4,586,772 521 ,533 655,353 608,360 9,332,096 I I I I I I I lvlol/day September 12.2005 15 I Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I Land & Open Space Acquisition Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Local Street Reconstruction I Brand Circle Pavement Reclamation LR-Ol-04 0 57,000 57,000 Local Street ReconstrucUon 57,000 57,000 Amlee Road Pavement Reclamation LR-01-06 0 85,800 85,800 Local Street Reconstruction 85,800 85,800 I Bituminous Overlays LR-03-04 0 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 Local Street Reconstruction 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 Bituminous Sealcoating LR-03-05 0 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 330,000 I Local Street Reconstruction 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 330,000 Wedgewood Drive Overlay & Reconstruction LR-Q4-01 0 240,500 240,500 Local Street Reconstruction 240,500 240,500 I Pavement Reclamation Wood Duck Circle LR-05-01 0 96,500 96,500 Local Street ReconstrucUon 96,500 96,500 County Road 19 Entry (Gateway) LR-05-Q2 0 10,000 10,000 I Local Street Reconstruction 10,000 10,000 Star Circle Reconstruction LR-06-01 0 57,000 57,000 Local Street Reconstruction 57,000 57,000 I Star Lane Reconstruction LR-06-02 0 265,000 265,000 Local Street Reconstruction 265,000 265,000 Retaining Wall & Guardrail-Lk Linden DrNellowston LR-Q6-03 0 27,000 27,000 I Local Street ReconstrucUon 27,000 27,000 Guardrail-Excelsior Blvd/Footprint Lk LR-06-04 0 22,000 22,000 Local Street Reconstruction 22,000 22,000 Guardrail-Spring Circle LR-06-05 0 24,000 24,000 I Local Street ReconstrucUon 24,000 24,000 Relocate Retaining Wall-Maple Ln/Shady Island LR-Q6-Q6 0 22,000 22,000 Local Street Reconstruction 22,000 22,000 I Beverly Dr Pavement Reclamation LR-07 -01 0 82,000 B2,000 Local Street ReconslrucUon 82,000 82,000 Street Reclamation Projects LR-07-02 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 I Local Street Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Bracketts Rd Pavement Reclamation LR-08-01 0 150,000 150,000 Local Street ReconstrucUon 150,000 150,000 I Local Street Reconstruction Total 1,067,800 343,000 411,000 261,000 261,000 2,343,800 Municipal State Aid Streets I Vine Hill Road - Mill and OVerlay MSA-03-05 0 104,000 104,000 MSA Funding 104,000 104,000 CR 19 Intersection Realignment MSA03-Q6 0 3,981,200 3,981,200 I MSA Advancel(Repay) -181,000 -181,000 -181,000 -543,000 Yellowstone Trail- Bit Overlay MSA-04-01 0 72,000 72,000 MSA Funding 72,000 72,000 I Municipal State Aid Streets Total 4,053,200 104,000 4,157 ,200 I Municipal Water System Woodhaven Well Interconnect with Chanhassen W-03-05 0 174,500 174,500 Water Revenue Bonds-2005 174,500 174,500 Water Meter Radio Read Project W-OS-06 0 210,000 210,000 I Water Revenue Bonds-2005 210,000 210,000 Monday September 12, 2005 I 17 Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I Amesbury Polyphosphate System W.04-DS 0 12,100 12,100 Municipal Water Fund 12,100 12,100 I Amesbury Well Controls Replacement W-05-02 0 75,000 75,000 Municipal Water Fund 75,000 75,000 Boulder Bridge Submersible Well- Pull & Inspect W-05-03 0 21,000 21,000 I Municipal Water Fund 21,000 21,000 S.E. Area Lineshaft Well. Pull & Inspect W-OS-01 0 22,000 22,000 Municipal Water Fund 22,000 22,000 I Interconnection of Amesbury & SE Area Wells W-07-01 0 62S,400 S26,4OO Water Revenue Bonds-2005 626,400 626,400 Amesbury Uneshaft Well- Pull & Inspect W-07-Q2 0 22,000 22,000 I Municipal Water Fund 22,000 22,000 Boulder Bridge Well #2 - Pull & Inspect W-09.01 0 21,045 21,045 Municipal Water Fund 21,045 21,045 I Water System Improvements W-10-D1 0 100,000 100,000 Municipal Water Fund 100,000 100,000 Municipal Water System Total 1,119,000 22,000 22,000 21,045 100,000 1,284,045 I Parks Park Improvements P-04-D3 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 I Park Foundation Donations 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Badger Park - Resurface tennis courts P-OS-D1 0 20,000 20,000 Park Fund 20,000 20,000 I Badger Park-Football and Hockey Lighting P-OS-D2 0 45,000 45,000 Park Fund 45,000 45,000 Silverwood Park-Erosion Control P-OS-03 0 8,000 8,000 Park Fund 8,000 8,000 I Skate Park-Equipment Rehabilitation P-06-D4 0 3,500 3,500 Park Fund 3,500 3,500 Minnewashta Dog Park-Matching Funds P-OS-05 0 5,000 5,000 I Park Fund 5,000 5,000 Freeman Park-Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station P-06-0S 0 12,000 12,000 Municipal Water Fund 6,000 6,000 I Park Fund 6,000 6,000 Skate Park-Drinking Fountain P-06-07 0 12,000 12,000 Municipal Water Fund 6,000 6,000 I Park Fund 6,000 6,000 Manor Park-Manor Park Pond WA Quality Improvements P-06-0S 0 5,000 5,000 Municipal Water Fund 5,000 5,000 Cathcart Parks-Resurface Tennis Court P-07-01 0 14,000 14,000 I Park Fund 14,000 14,000 Freeman Park.Wetiand Enhancement/ Interpretive Cen P-07-02 0 428,000 428,000 DonaUons 42,800 42,800 I Grant Money 342,400 342,400 Stormwater Management Fund 42,800 42,800 Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area P-08-01 0 25,000 25,000 I Donations 8,333 8,333 Grant Money 8,334 8,334 Park Fund 8,333 8,333 Parks Total 115,500 447,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 602,500 I Public Facilities/Office Equip I Computer Upgrades PF-03-06 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Monda." September /2, 2005 18 I I Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Public Facilities/Office Equipment 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I Civil Defense Sirens PF.05-05 0 25,000 25,000 Public Facilities/Office Equipment 25,000 25,000 Network (Computer) Upgrade PF-Q6-01 0 17,250 17 ,250 I Public Facilities/Office Equipment 17,250 17,250 City Hall Project PF-06-02 0 3,300,000 3,300,000 G.O. Bonds-2oo7 wi City Hall 3,300,000 3,300,000 I Public Works Addition (Bay w/lift) PF-Q6-03 0 60,000 340,000 400,000 G.O. Bonds-2oo7 wi City Hall 60,000 340,000 400,000 Document Retrieval System Upgrades PF-Q6-04 0 10,000 10,000 I General Fund 10,000 10,000 City Hall ~enerator PF.06-05 0 16,000 16,000 Public Facllltles/Offlce Equipment 16,000 16,000 I Public Works Building Generator PF-06-Q6 0 38,000 38,000 Public Facilities/Office Equipment 38,000 38,000 Public Facilities/Office Equip Total 159,000 3,667,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 3,856,250 I Sanitary Sewer Infiltration and Inflow Reduction 5S-03-o5 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 I Sanitary Sewer Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Lift Station 17 Rehabilitation SS.Q4.01 0 81,000 81,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund 81,000 81,000 I Lilt Station 16 Rehabilitation SS-05-o2 0 25,000 79,000 104,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund 25,000 79,000 104,000 Lift Station Pump Rebuilds and Mountings SS-Q6-o1 0 30,000 30,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund 30,000 30,000 I Portable Lift Station Control Panel SS.06-o2 0 6,000 6,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund 6,000 6,000 Lilt Station 12 Rehabilitation S5-o7 -01 0 19,000 91,000 110,000 I Sanitary Sewer Fund 19,000 91,000 110,000 Sanitary Sewer Total 192,000 148,000 141,000 50,000 50,000 581,000 I Stormwater Mana~ement Gideon Glen Improvements(City Costs) STM.04-01 0 70,000 70,000 Met Council Grant Money 70,000 70,000 I Glen Road Drainage STM-04-02 0 25,000 25,000 Stormwater Management Fund 25,000 25,000 Misc Stormwater Projects STM-04-05 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 I . Stormwater Management Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 Stormwater Management Total 125,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 I GRAND TOT AL 7,122,278 4,767,772 702,533 655,353 608,360 13,856,296 I I I Monda)' September 12, 2005 I 19 Capital Improvement Program I City of Shorewood, Minnesota I PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE WITH BALANCES 2006 thru 2010 I I Source Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I Donations Beainnina Balance Freeman Park-Wetland Enhancement/Interpretive Cen P-07-02 0 42,800 42,800 I Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area P-08-01 0 8,333 8,333 Donations Total 42,800 8,333 51,133 I Equipment Replacement Fund Beainnina Balance $136,136 ($149,642) ($255, 164) ($308,697) ($582,005) ($625,365) I Groundsmaster Mower E-02-57 0 23,029 23,029 Air Compressor E-05-38 0 14,409 14,409 I Dump Truck Lighting System E-OS-O 1 0 4,000 4,000 Dump Truck - Ford L8000 E.06-33 0 123,735 123,735 F350 & Flatbed E-06-49 0 36,558 36,558 I Dump w/Plow and SND E-06-54 0 121,485 121,485 Trail King Trailer E-07.21 0 8,189 8,189 Ford 555 Backhoe E-07-22 0 64,459 64,459 I Tennant 240 Floor Sweeper E-07-46 0 12,401 12,401 Mower - Toro Groundsmaster 325D E-07-70 0 20,473 20,473 I Tractor - Ford 3910 E.08.35 0 31,633 31,633 Speed Awareness Display E.08-51 0 21,900 21,900 Dump Truck E-09-65 0 136,654 136,654 I Dump truck - Ford E.09-68 0 136,654 136,654 Trailer E-10.41 0 3,027 3,027 42"-48" Walk-behind Mower E-1D-73 0 2,895 2,895 I Equipment Replacement Fund Total 285,778 105,522 53,533 273,308 43,360 761,501 G.O. Bonds-2007 wi City Hall I Beainnina Balance $4,000,000 $3,940,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 City Hall Project PF-06-02 0 3,300,000 3,300,000 I Public Works Addition (Bay w/lift) PF.06.03 0 60,000 340,000 400,000 G.O. Bonds-2007 w/ City Hall Total 60,000 3,640,000 3,700,000 I General Fund I Beainnina Balance $2,941,223 $2,926,223 $2,921,223 $2,916.223 $2,911,223 $2,906,223 Land Conservation Easements LO-04-01 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 MOl/day September 12,2005 I 20 I Source Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Document Retrieval System Upgrades PF-06-04 0 10,000 10,000 I General Fund Total 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 I Grant Money Beainnina Balance Freeman Park-Wetland Enhancement/Interpretive Cen P-07-02 0 342,400 342,400 I Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area P-08-D1 0 8,334 8,334 Grant Money Total 342,400 8,334 350,734 I Local Street Reconstruction I Beainnina Balance $1,068,222 $422 ($342,578) ($753,578) ($1,014,578) ($1,275,578) Brand Circle Pavement Reclamation LR-01-Q4 0 57,000 57,000 Amlee Road Pavement Reclamation LR-01-06 0 85,800 85,800 I Bituminous Overlays LR-03-Q4 0 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 Bituminous Sealcoating LR-03-05 0 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 330,000 Wedgewood Drive Overlay & Reconstruction LR-Q4-01 0 240,500 240,500 I Pavement Reclamation Wood Duck Circle LR-OS-Q1 0 96,500 96,500 County Road 19 Entry (Gateway) LR-OS-02 0 10,000 10,000 Star Circle Reconstruction LR-06-01 0 57,000 57,000 I Star Lane Reconstruction LR-06-02 0 265,000 265,000 Retaining Wall & Guardrail-Lk Linden DrNellowston LR-06-03 0 27,000 27,000 I Guardrail-Excelsior Blvd/Footprint Lk LR-06-Q4 0 22,000 22,000 Guardrail-Spring Circle LR-06-05 0 24,000 24,000 Relocate Retaining Wall-Maple Ln/Shady Island LR-06-06 0 22,000 22,000 I Beverly Dr Pavement Reclamation LR-07 -01 0 82,000 82,000 Street Reclamation Projects LR-07-02 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Bracketts Rd Pavement Reclamation LR-OS-01 0 150,000 150,000 I Local Street Reconstruction Total 1,067,800 343,000 411,000 261,000 261,000 2,343,800 I Met Council Grant Money Beainnina Balance $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I Gideon Glen Improvements(City Costs) STM-04-01 0 : 70,000 70,000 Met Council Grant Money Total 70,000 70,000 I MSA Advance/(Repay) Beainnina Balance $885,000 $1,066,000 $1,247,000 $1,428,000 $1,428,000 $1,428,000 I CR 19 Intersection Realignment MSAOS-06 0 -181,000 -181,000 -181,000 -543,000 MSA Advance/(Repay) Total -181,000 -181,000 -181,000 -543,000 I MSA FundinJ,?; Beainnina Balance $126,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 ($50,000) I Vine Hill Road - Mill and Overlay MSA-03-05 0 104,000 104,000 Yellowstone Trail- Bit Overtay MSA.04-01 0 72,000 72,000 I Monda}' Seprember /2, 2005 21 Source Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I MSA Funding Total 72,000 104,000 176,000 I Municipal Water Fund Beainnina Balance $2,303,810 $2,178,710 $2,156,710 $2,134,710 $2,113,665 $2,013,665 I Freeman Park-Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station P-06-06 0 6,000 6,000 Skate Park-Drinking Fountain P-Q6-07 0 6,000 6,000 Manor Park-Manor Park Pond WA Quality Improvements P-06-08 0 5,000 5,000 I Amesbury Polyphosphate System W-Q4-08 0 12,100 12,100 Amesbury Well Controls Replacement W-05-02 0 75,000 75,000 .1 Boulder Bridge Submersible Well- Pull & Inspect W-05-03 0 21.,000 21,000 S.E. Area Lineshaft Well- Pull & Inspect W-Q6-01 0 22,000 22,000 Amesbury Lineshaft Well- Pull & Inspect W-07-02 0 22,000 22,000 I Boulder Bridge Well #2 - PuU-& Inspect W-09-01 0 21,045 21,045 Water System Improvements W-10-01 0 100,000 100,000 I Municipal Water Fund Total 125,100 22,000 22,000 21,045 100,000 290,145 Park Foundation Donations I Beainnina Balance Park Improvements P-04-03 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 I Park Foundation Donations Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Park Fund I Beainnina Balance $241,905 $148,405 $134,405 $126,072 $126,072 $126,072 Badger Park - Resurface tennis courts P-Q6-01 0 20,000 20,000 I Badger Park-Football and Hockey Lighting P-Q6-Q2 0 45,000 45,000 SilveIWood Park-Erosion Control P-06-03 0 8,000 a,ooo Skate Park-Equipment Rehabilitation P-06-04 0 3,500 3,500 I Minnewashta Dog Park-Matching Funds P-Q6-05 0 5,000 5,000 Freeman Park-Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station P.06-o6 0 6,000 6,000 Skate Park-Drinking Fountain P-Q6-07 0 6,000 6,000 I Cathcart Parks-Resurface Tennis Court P-07 -01 0 14,000 14,000 Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area p-Oa-Ol 0 8,333 8,333 I Park Fund Total 93,500 14,000 8,333 115,833 Public Facilities/Office Equipment I Beainnina Balance $105,111 $16,111 ($11,139) ($21,139) ($31,139) ($41,139) Computer Upgrades PF-03-Q6 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I Civil Defense Sirens PF.05-05 0 25,000 25,000 Network (Computer) Upgrade PF-06-01 0 17,250 17,250 City Hall Generator PF-06-05 0 16,000 16,000 I Public Works Building Generator PF-06-06 0 38,000 38,000 Public Facilities/Office Equipment 89,000 27,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 146,250 I Total Mot/da}' Seprember 12.2005 I 22 I Source Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I Sanitary Sewer Fund Beainnina Balance $3,282,450 $3,090,450 $2,942,450 $2,801,450 $2,751,450 $2,701,450 Infiltration and Inflow Reduction SS-03-0S 0 SO,OOO SO,OOO SO,ooO SO,OOO SO ,000 2S0,OOO I Lift Station 17 Rehabilitation SS-04-01 0 e1,OOO e1,000 Lift Station 16 Rehabilitation SS-OS-o2 0 2S,000 79,000 104,000 Lift Station Pump Rebuilds and Mountings SS-06.01 0 30,000 30,000 I Portable Lift Station Control Panel SS-06-Q2 0 6,000 6,000 Lift Station 12 Rehabilitation SS-07-o1 0 19,000 91,000 110,000 I Sanitary Sewer Fund Total 192,000 148,000 141,000 SO,OOO 50,000 581,000 Stormwater Management Fund I Beainnina Balance $274,084 $219,084 $148,284 $116,284 $86,284 $56,284 Freeman Park-Wetland Enhancement! Interpretive Cen P.07.02 0 42,800 42,BOO I Glen Road Drainage STM.04.02 0 2S,OOO 2S,000 Mise Stomnwater Projects STM-04-05 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1 SO ,000 Storm water Management Fund Total 55,000 72,800 30,000 30,000 30,000 217,800 I Water Revenue Bonds-200S I Beainnina Balance $1,471,500 $460,600 $480,800 $460,600 $460,600 $480,600 Woodhaven Well Interconnect with Chanhassen W-03-0S 0 17 4,SOO 174,SOO Water Meter Radio Read Project W-03-06 0 210,000 210,000 I Interconnection of Amesbury & SE Area Wells W-07-01 0 626,400 626,400 Water Revenue Bonds-200S Total 1,010,900 1,010,900 I GRAND TOTAL 2,960,078 4,Se6,772 521,533 655,353 608,360 9,332,096 --------..-----.---.-------.-.,.-....--.-- I I I I I I I I Monday September 12. 2005 23 ~ .... -I I H (J\ -0 )> <i' m H Z -I m Z t=t o z )> r !< r m ..." -I {P r )> Z ^ ------------------- U) f- u w ...., 0 a. 0- Z '< ..J 0- f- Z w ~ In W C'o.I > 0 a. 0- ~ H ..J '< f- H 0- '< U . H H H ------------------- ...., 0) -t I H (J) " ~ ij) m H Z -t m Z ;:t o z ~ r ~ r m " -t 0:7 r ~ Z ^ ------------------- j~i:" Percent InllaUon at Cast Basis assumea per year Unl Maael Acq Ute Year 01 Cast I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I No Year CescripUan Cate (Yrsl Rplmt Basis 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ~1:; Ii -.' S - ;:,~:.i', Ii - ~. .. Ii '. ~.' S :",h S . 2~~: S . ~~';'. Ii . ';;~~;. S - .... S . .-.... S . ~/: :::-:. $ - ",,,. $ $ - ..... S '',C''''" $ - . . S - ;..',':~, Ii Trailer 24' - Trail Kine 1987 20 2007 S 7,000 ...,..", S . .~",':'" S .b. S 8,189 "'.': S ... S .,:..-, I- Z w ~ a.. 1-1 :) (J w - - '+- 0- 0 Oa>~ ..s::-g 00- +- 0 V) 0 'e o c o o ~ c o c: o +- c o E ~ o ~ 0.. ..s:: o ~ o :::J ~-o +- ~ o..s:: ..s:: 0 +- V) L. ~ o..s:: ~ +- >-'+- ~ 0 ..s:: ~ +- V) V) 0 ~ e- '+- :::J +- 0- C ~ 0 -0 L. ~ ~ > :::J 0 -0 ~ ..s:: u V') +- - 0 -o-o..s:: c ~ +- :::J 0 V) LL.-~ O-u ~ L. L. :::J ~ 0 .0 ~ L. ~+-(\) V)~ ..s:: 0 '+- ~ +-..s::~3:+-:::J +-~>-811 b ~ U :!:: ~ ..s:: :E~:..c\;Jc:~ o ~ ~ 0 -0 0- > ..s:: V) ..s:: > c _V) 0 +- V) U 0 0>- ,>-:::JL. +-+-'+-+-c; V) 0- V) ., H C C 0.. L."" ~OV)O ~ 1 -0 ~ C <0:( _V) 5+-~UO u V) ::J -S! -0 t\i 5 o 11o..c:::Jo +-t:i..s::~o-o\.) 1= ~L.~1>- o +- 0 -- 0 +- +- c c '+- 0..0 V) () o L. ~ ~ +-oE..s::-o~~~ >- O-E 0.. 3: ~ L. ..s:: ..s:: L. -- +- :::J >- +- +- '-:::J -0 - ..s:: o o-~~t:c+- ~ V) (\) .::;..s:: 0 . 3: ~ +-'+- +- ~ 0 0-,,, A' H 0 0 :::J ~ .., C V) '+- .... C ~ -- 0 -0 0 ~ ~ >-+- >-~-o .0 V) -- L. .- L. > ~ -00..0 CO 0.0 ~ ..s:: ~ (\) ti E 0 c u ~..s:: +- o u 3:..s:: ~ _V) ~ ~ -0.0 ~ ~5 ~]~ ~~ ()'+- ~ >-L. E ~ - ..s:: ~ 0 V) ~03:.oU~O ..s:: - ~ ~..s:: +- 0.. -0 -0 L. U U >- ~ ~ 0 -;: L. V) +- U -0 .....:::J +-V)OCV)~O- ~ .- a.. ~ 0 > +- E~~~~..s::oc :::J L. ~ ~ ~ b 11 ] .c -~ 1= [ ..s::..s::: o.o~ ~:::J +-O+-S!>Eo- V) .... ~ ~ +-V)~OU-o CO,+-..9 C ~1=~Ho..O E ~ L. ~ V) ~ E ~ L. ~ ..9 0-.0 ~ .c g' o..:::JC L.O ~0-000..r.: L.~U-o~U ~ ..r.: _ ..... 3: +- c: ~ E ~ u 0 o 0.. +- 0 ~ >-'U C:i.. - C ~ 0 +- ~ C C-'+- ~ .!!! ~ "t 0- +- ..r.: ~ '- C +- - ~~ >-'+- wE'+-V) .- ~ ~ _e- ~ L. ..r.: :::J ~ 0 L- 0- -0 ::> r- ~ ._ > ~ - - - - - to- V) '+- (\) +- OCO..r.:C ~ 0 +- ~ ?""+= ~ E OO-O~O- NEL.(\):::J ofJ1~Jr 5~+-V)~ '+-C-gL...s:: -0 -a 0 g :: ~+-V)>-O -oL.~ +- ~ ~ U ~ '- ~ 0 C L. C CV)..200 ~~.8~~ o 0 ..r.: ~ +- +-EV):EV) o V) 0 ..r.: 0 +- (\) +-~c.,gE V)c; O+-+- ~ C -0 A' V) o ~ .., L. > U ..r.: gV)~+-+- V)..s::..s::g+- ~ ..... U 0 L. 0 -oV) ~ V) ~ A' L. ..s:: -0 ~ :> .., 0 +-C+- -g~ +-:::JOU~>- V)LL.L.CE3: O+-+-:::JE~ UCV)O '+- ~~~\.)O+- L. E L. U X o ~ ~ ,+-~+-+-L.~ U C C C o 0'- ..r.: +--~~U~ 0-_ E 0 ..s::: +- ~ .0 0.. 0 +- eC:i.. g:::J ag' ~ +- ~ ~ 0-.- +- C V) .., 0 L. +-~~O'l~:::J OEL.c..s:::-o V) 0.. 0 L--o c: -- '+- V) r- C,\) o ::J ~ 0 -- o-..r.:..s::: b tJW+-~:;-o ~ ~ 0 :::J .- 0- . -,..r.: +- 0.. '+- :::J ~+--O,+-~V) 0.. L. L. 0 +- o 0 c .Q '+- ~ g V) g -g L. += _!!! 0 o -- ..s::: 0 -0 -0 L.+--CC C ~ __ "!= :::J :::J LL. 0.. 3: .... '+- LL. - - - - - - - - - - l"- N - - I r:;:':'~-::::~s:r~owe~------ -- - Il_.- --. ... _.. - ---.--.----..------ -.. .-.---- -.---.----....-.---. -.... Fund I/: ....-........-...-.-..................1 ._H'" .... ._____._ .._...__1 1 Description 1 Fustiticution Prior Expenditures 1 17,500 I EqulpN ehicles/Fumishings Total Total 1 Prior Funding Sources 17,500 I Equipment Replacement Fund 1 Total Total Total Cost $70,833 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Small Tools & Equip Priority n/a Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement . 2010 Total Future 23,029 23,029 30,3041 23,029 23,029 Total 2010 Total Future 23,029 23,029 30,3041 23,029 23,029 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 E-OS-38 Project It I Project Name Air Compressor Fund # I I [ Description C- Efication Expenditures EquipNehicles/Furnishings Total Cost $14,409 I l 2006 2007 2008 2009 I Total Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Small Tools & Equip Priority n/a Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement ..__--=:J 2010 14,409 14,409 Total 14,409 14,409 I Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 2010 14,409 14,409 Total 14,409 14,409 1 I 1 1 I iHonda)' Seprember 11.2005 29 I Total Future I 123,735 190,4841 123,735 Total Total Future I 123,735 190,4841 123,735 Total 1 1 1 1 1 1 I'"~ ..----.. .-.-. ....--- -- _ u . _ _u I Project # E-06-01 . ~~~~ct N~~_~~y_!~ck !-ighting S~st~~ Fund It Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement Total Cost $4,000 Description Retrofit DOT safety lighting system on the dump truck, t Justiflcation Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Furnishings Total 2010 Total 4,000 4,000 2006 4,000 4,000 2007 2008 2009 Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 '4,000 4,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 4,000 4,000 '\ .~~~~:~~- -'-"-E:06~33'--- -------.. - -- _uU' ...- .--- ----.---.------- -- --l _p~~~~~~~~~~__p~P- T.~~~~_~~2~ L~~~O_..___ __.._____.... _ ____ ___._u.._..._._ ___._..._J Fund # Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority n/a Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement J Total Cost $314,219 FriPtion Vusti~ication Expenditures EquipNehicles/Furnishings 2006 123,735 123,735 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 123,735 123,735 2007 2008 2009 2010 MOllda." S.'prember 12. 2005 30 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 11'"...... ....,.-.......-.-----......, ..,... .,--....-...........--,-..............--..,.......... ! Project # E-06-49 I Project Name F350 & Flatbed I--'---''';:;~d #.------------..----.-- I Description II Justification Expenditures EquipN ehicleslFumishings ... ......-...-...-"- -_.. "..-------.-\ . .. ,_____.___ ___._" ... ______.__..__.........__,.._.__..,_.._.'........ ..J Total Cost $95,089 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category pW: Vehicles Priority nla Contact Public Works Director DepartIllent Equipment Replacement I Total 2010 I Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 36,558 36,558 2008 2009 2010 Total Future 36,558 58,531 I 36,558 Total Total Future 36,558 58,531 I 36,558 Total 2007 2006 36,558 36,558 2008 2009 I 2007 I r---'--- --.--...-. .' _.-- -- ---------.-...----------.-... - ...-- ..-, - -" - ._._-, -..".-.---..- .-.-.- ! Project If E-06-S4 II P-'~j""_N:~Du~~!!'lo~~n~S~ .~------ ----~ -. I ~escriPlion I tstification l Total Cost $308,506 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement ~ I Expenditures EqulpN ehicles/Furnishings Total I Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total I I I I I I MUI/day Seprember J 2. 2005 2006 121,485 121,485 2008 2009 2007 2010 Total Future 121.485 187,021 I 121,485 Total Total Ji'l1tUl"l~ 121,485 187,021 I 121,485 Total 2006 121,485 121,485 2007 2008 2009 2010 31 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority oJa Contact Public Works Director DepartInenr Equipment Replacement r;~~j~~~;----- E-07 - 21 '1 Project Name Trail King Trailer .__"..____~_"_,_~,...__.~__._'__w.,__,..._._._._..________._.~,._.._..__.._._.,_'__ Fund It Total Cost $8,189 ----J I 2008 2009 2010 Total I 64,459 64,459 2008 2009 2010 Total I 64,459 64,459 I I I I I I Description \ Justification Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings Total 2010 Total 8,189 8,189 2008 2009 2006 2007 8,189 8,189 Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 2007 8,189 8,189 2008 2010 Total 8,189 8,189 2009 -----------"-----.---------..-------.---------"" ......-----...----..-"----...----.---------.----------] ProjecU E-07-22 Projcct Namc Ford 555 Backhoe __. ._"_____....,......~.,.,_.,"_.___.._....,_..___._"______._,_,._..._.___~_.'_._....__ .,.._ ,_.._...._...~_.._""'__._._...._..._...._....__._'.h.h_...".__..__..___."".._-.'__ ._._............_... .._,. Fund It Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement ToM Cost $64,4$9 ~scriPtion r ustification L__ Expenditures 2006 2007 EquipNehicles/Fumishings 64,459 Total 64,459 Funding Sources 2006 2007 Equipment Replacement Fund 64,459 Total 64,459 Monday September n. 2005 32 I I I I I I I I I ___-.-J I I .......-.------...--.......-- ......-.-.-......--.--.-----...--..-. I Description Total Cost $12,401 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority oJa Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement Project # E-07 -46 Project Name Tennant 240 Floor Sweeper I L._. ....-..-.-.----.-.-.---.---- _.____._._______._.___.__.___......._.._...__.___n._..-..------.--......-..-.--....-.....-- -.. . Fund It I [JUstification I Expenditures 2006 2007 EquipN ehicles/Fumishings 12,401 Total 12,401 Funding Sources 2006 2007 Equipment Replacement Fund 12,401 Total 12,401 2008 2009 2010 Total 12,401 12,401 I 2008 2009 2010 Total 12,401 12,401 I I .-._.__.,',.."".._.,-----,,,._-._.__.,-_._._._..._~.._---,-_._-,--._--,--~.._,_._..."_._..._._..._.._..._--'-.--.......-.----.-..--..---."---." I J Total Cost $82,865 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Depllrtmcnt Equipment Replacement Project It E-07-70 I Project Name Mower - Toro Groundsmaster 325D . -,,-,.. .,......-..-. .---.--.-,,,.-..---..--.-...-... ~- "......,,-,-,-_.._-'_..._--~_.._~._'._._"...'-. ."'...--... ._>.-.-...- .-.,.........-.....".''',',...''.........-....."..'.,..-.......-... ........-..--........".-....---..-....,.,.-...-... Fund It I Description L \ Justification I -..J "l I Expenditures 2006 2007 EquipN ehicles/Fumishings 20,473 Total 20,473 Funding Sources 2006 2007 Equipment Replacement Fund 20,473 Total 20,473 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,473 20,473 Future 62,3921 Total I I 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,473 20,473 Future 62,392\ Total I I I I I Monda)' Seprember 12. 2005 33 r;~:~:~-~---_._-E-08~35 .... ...... .-- .--..---...---....-.-.-.-..-..... .---.------..----.-.-----..-..-----.-.--. .. I Project Nume Tractor - Ford 3910 .....-.-.-.-.---...----.......--.....-..-....-.....----..--.--.--.......----...-.---.---...-.--....--.-......".,.-....,.,.'. ..-.~.._,".','.,._..,-..,_. .,.-.-.--...",....,."..-....--.-..- Fund # Total Cost $31,633 I Description Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority cia Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement I I l Justification Expenditures EquipN ehicleslFumishings Total 2006 2008 31,633 31,633 2009 2007 I 2010 Total 31 ,633 31,633 I 2006 Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2007 2008 31.633 31,633 2009 --- --- --.-- ._-- --------... ----------- ------.-------.- ---..- - -------1 r ;~~ject # E-08-51 \_~~~j_e~~~~~~__~R!~~_ Awaren.!~.~~?!~_____.__ ._.._________..__...____ ___.____ .___ .._ _ . Fund # I Description L L J ustitication I Total Cost $21,900 I L Prior Expenditures o I EquipNehicles/Furnishings Total Total 2006 2008 21,900 21,900 2007 2009 2010 I Total 31,633 31,633 I Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Depl\rbnent Equipment Replacement I I ~ I 2010 Total 21 ,900 21,900 I Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2006 2008 21,900 21,900 2007 2009 Monday September 12.2005 34 2010 I Total 21,900 21,900 I I I I I I I -. ----..--.-..--.--.--..--..--.--...----.-.----..----.--...---.-.. Project # E-09-65 Project Name Dump Truck I ----..--.---.------------.----------.-.-- Fund # I Description ,-"-,.._.,-._,.".".,.,, ...,.,~,,-,..-..-_._......._-_\ Total Cost $347,027 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority n1a Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement I ~ustification Expenditures EquipN ehicleslFumishings I Total 2010 I Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total I 2006 2007 2008 2009 . 136,654 136,654 2010 I Total Future 136,654 210,3731 136,654 Total Total Future 136,654 210,3731 136,654 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 136,654 136,654 I E-09-68 .,',.,,,.,'_"'__..__..~_,,_"___._.._._____.._.._._.._~.u.._..___"_..__.__.__.~___..._.'~,"",_..,,_~___._...._....._,__....._.........._.._._.__...M__.._M_~._... .-.-.-......-...,,'.-'......--.--. Project # I Project Name Dump truck - Ford L .._... _.. ..__..____._.___.__._._..__..._._ ..- ---.- _. .-......----- Fund # I l Description L Total Cost $136,654 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority n1a Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement I ~lstification I 2007 2008 2009 136,654 136,654 I Expenditur-es 2006 EquipN ehicles/Furnishings Total I I I I I I I Monday Seplember 12. 2005 ~ 2010 Total 136,654 136,654 2007 2008 2009 136,654 136,654 Funding Sources 2006 Equipment Replacement Fund Total 2010 Total 136,654 136,654 35 Project # E-I0-41 ProJect Name Trailer Fund # Description Total Cost $3,027 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Vehicles Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement I I I I Justification Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings Total 2006 2007 2009 I 2010 Total 3,027 3,027 3,027 3,027 2010 Total 3,027 3,027 3,027 3,027 I E:~: :~~~~:~'-Walk.~bind MO:--~------ -----] l.__..____.._______.________ .----.----------------... - -----.- - -- --....-.. ....-.- Fund # Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total L I Descdption I L I J llstit~cation Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings 2008 2006 2007 2009 I I 2008 Tof:nl Cost $2,895 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category PW: Small Tools & Equip Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Replacement I I ___-.J I -..J I 2010 Total I 2,895 2,895 2,895 2,895 2010 Total I 2,895 2,895 2,895 2,895 I I I I I I 2006 2009 Total Funding Sources Equipment Replacement Fund Total Mrmdcz." Seprember J:;, 2005 2007 2008 2006 2007 2008 2009 36 z o ~ H V) H j C1 u < w u < a- U) Z W a- o D Z < D Z < ...J . co S::-O -0 s:: (\).2-0 -o4-(\) s:: 0 -0 (\) s:: U Eo(\) E+--o 8 :~ Vl (\) ::J ~ L. 0- '""' u::= (\) uCJUE ~t5+- ---I'+-OVl ........., u. l\)..c(\)..s:: l\) -a ..t: +- +- ::J +- +- +- s:: CJ .- s:: s:: l\) ECJo+- Eo+- .~ OOOL. uo~O- -a ~-o ~ +- 0 '- 0- s:: ~ Vl 0- l\)-tA-S::CJ E+-O l\) U {Jl cO'lL. o -0 l\) 1: .~ :J +- l\) >.o'+- E tD;>-.< +- -0 :!:: vi E c U +- E CJ l\) s:: 0 s:: ..t: l\) U o +- E +- +- l\) 0 o 0 Vl :J >..t: 0 s:: L. +- l\) C l\) +- s:: 0 VlL.OO s:: 0 '- o 0- +- 0 U l\) 5! o~ -0 L. L. In s:: 0 . l\) -tA- o s:: ~ 0 ---I 0 l\) '+- U 1; ..t: {Jl L. ..s:: I-+-o+- r- ('OJ - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - 38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT 2006 thru 2010 Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Land & Open Space Acquisition Land ConselVation Easements LO.Q4.01 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Land & Open Space Acquisition Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 GRAND TOT AL 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 ,'.,fllI/day September ]2. 2005 I -...-.....-............----..---.--...........-.......... ........--..-.-.-....-.-....-...-----....-...-.....--............-..-....--] Project # LO-04-01 Project Name Land Conservation Easements I ....-...-....-.-........--.-.........-----.-.----.---.....-....--..-.---.-..-.." ............ ......--.-...-..----.....- Fund # I Description Total Cost $35,000 Annual appropriation for land acquisition or conservation easements. Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Land & Open Space Acquisitio Priority nla Contact Finance Department Land & Open Space Acquisitio II Justification I Prior 10,000 I Total 2006 5,000 5,000 2007 5,000 5,000 Expenditures Land Acquisition & Easements Total 2008 5,000 5,000 2009 5,000 5,000 2010 Total 5,000 25,000 5,000 25,000 2010 Total 5,000 25,000 5,000 25,000 I Funding Sources General Fund 2006 5,000 5,000 2007 5,000 5,000 Prior 10,000 I Total Total I I I I I I I I I I I I I MOllday September n. 2005 39 2008 5,000 5,000 2009 5,000 5,000 ~ o -t I H U\ -0 ~ (i) m H Z -t m Z ;:t o z ~ r ~ r m -n -t OJ r ~ Z ^ ------------------- Q Z ::> lL Z o t: u ::> Cl. l- V) Z o u w Cl. I- w w Cl. l- V) ..J 'C( U o ..J - - +- +- u a. VI :::J Q) -0 t.. U 0 +- X 0 ~ Q) (1. o ~ >-- U "U +- Q) 0 C t.. 0 :::J -o~8 t..-o o c ...s::: 0 V) ::J ..0 o +-4- -0 0 Q) ...s::: VI . u VI >-- o ;: >--...s::: +- 0"1 UI ..0 OQ)~ +- . C VI .c ::J Q) +- t.. VI c f- ...s::: Q) -g;~ ~ V) c o +- U ::J t.. +- VI c o u Q) (1.4--0 o +- '<( Q) Q) 0 Q) t.. +- +- C 0 V) '(1 +- +-V) o c U '(1 .3 E Q)-o .c c I- 0 VI ~ >--VI o Q) ;: +- -0 :::J o 0 o t.. t.. ,..... Q) '<( ...s:::V) +-:E '-' - o a. U C :::J :E VI>-->-- >--:!::.~ . tj~--o ;:Q)~5 ]-C+-lL o I- t: >-- t.. Q) CJ E ;: VI-o VI 0 Q) 0 ~CL. '4- -a .... Ot......- l\) >-- 0 VI tj U l\) ~ ;:.3 E <.!> -0 l\) ~\ 0 .- O..c~+= 10+-04- >--E+-o (i"j 0 c >- +- t.. Q) :!:: tj'4-E> E Q) _l\) ~ 'x 5 0.. ~. ~ U E 0 ~~"U l\) ....- c-C ....CJtj+- VI . ~ l\) l\) C 0.. t.. .- >-- +- :::J o +- tj VI +- Q) C VI t.. C '(1 l\) U 0 Et..o+- ~ +- VI -0 .- "U +- o -0 l\) C o C l\) l\) ;: l\) s:: E ~ ~ l\) l\) ol\)...s:::~ ..s:::-c+-t.. V) U -0 0.. 4- :J l\) E o VI VI t.. VI U >--0::J_ +-'4-~..o U V) '- :J -0 "U a. l\) C VI t.. -C ::::J 0 0 I-lL...s:::'4- -a-o U s:: o~ - - VI E VI l\) tj +- ..o~ CJV) ::::J +- C C C l\) CJ E C Q) CJ 01 o C C o~~ VI <:; U ~ +- .~ ;: ~ ~ -OEa. o Q) C o > 0 t.. CJ Vlo..t ->- (1. :::J :!:: w J: \J V) VI l\) '<( s:: ...s:::IS +-0..'4- '4- l\) 0 o -C >-- +-+- -a 0"1 t.. C 0 VI VI t.. l\) :J 0.. +- tj -0 l\) :J l\) -C -a-o+- > t.. 01 l\) 0 s:: t.. ~ +- l\) 0 l\) t.. :J C l\)-a 01 t.. > s:: 0 l\) w ~ C >--o+- +- +- VI U CJ VI ::::J VI l\) -a CJ -C > 0 I-w+- - - C >-- CJ 0 ;: ~-o +- CJ ~ 0 . ...., t.. 0_ t.. 0 a.u o >-- o l\) ;:-c -0 +- CJ t.. o 0 t..'4- o >-- U t.. o tj E ...s::: E U ::::J o VI l\) l\) U t.. t.. o ::::J '4- 0 VI VI 01 Cj s:: VI .- 0-0 a.c o ::::J t.. '4- 0..-0 +- s:: U CJ l\) - . ...., l\) ~:; a.'1J l\) l\)-C t.. U o VI O1t C l\) . ~ "e? o t.. 0.. o '4-Cj l\) t.. -c l\) I- ~ - E Q) +- VI >-- VI - - - - - - - - - .... ~ - - 11---....----.....------...--........-..-.-..-.--..-------. .... .......-....-.....-...-...--...-.-......-.-..-------------..- ....-. ..-... ..........--........-.....--. I Project /I: LR-Ol-04 Project Name Brand Circle Pavement Reclamation 1 -.------.---.--..--..------.-.-..----.--........-.-.........................------.---.-..--....-...--.------. ....-.-....--...-...-- Fund /I: Type hnprovement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority n/a 1 Description Total Cost $57,000 This project includes reclamation of Brand Circle from Mill Street to the cul-de-sac. Contact Engineer Department LocalStreetReconstruction 1 \ Justitication Expenditures 2006 1 Planning/Design/Survey 7,000 Construction/Inspection 43,475 Contingencies 6,525 1 Total 57,000 Funding Sources 2006 1 Local Street Reconstruction 57,000 Total 57,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 7,000 43,475 6,525 57,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 57,000 57,000 1 Type hnptovement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction 1 Project /I: LR-Ol-06 Project Name Amlee Road Pavement Reclamation Fund /I: I' Description Tutul Cost $91,800 This project includes Pavement Reclamation from Manitou Lane to the cul-de-sac, l 1 I Justification I J 1 Prior 6,000 I Total Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 75,600 10,200 85,800 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 75,600 10,200 85,800 1 Total 1 Prior .6,000 I Total Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction 2006 85,800 85,800 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 85,800 85,800 Total 1 1 1 1 1 lvlollday S~pre/llber 12, 2005 43 1...........---.---.----..-..--..--.-----.........--......----...---...-...........---.-..---...-....----.......-..........-.............J-.... I Project /I: LR-03-04 Project Name Bituminous Overlays M__________..._~,......_._._ . -.---.~.......-..-~--.-.---....--_.._-.--.-......-_..--~._.________ Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla 1 I Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $750,000 Department Local Street Reconstruction 1 The City has traditionally allocated $80,000 per year towards bituminous overlay projects. It is recommended that this amount be increased to $90,000 per year. I Justification Prior Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 275,000 I Construction/Inspection 83,750 83,750 83,750 83,750 95,000 430,000 Total Contingencies 11,250 11 ,250 11 ,250 11,250 45,000 Total 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 Prior Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 275,000 I Local Street Reconstruction 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 Total Total 95.000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 1 1 1 1 \..........-.------...-.....-.---...-..--.-.---..................--....----....---....-----... .----...........--......-....---.:..--.........--1 Project # LR-03-0S I Project Name Bituminous Sealcoating I _......_ ."_"~ ...~._..._.._____..__-..___._...___....n_.'_____.".~.______....____._.._.__...._..___.._._._....__,._......_.__.._.._..___-'-_,".'-_...._....._.__.... 1 Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction 1 Description Total Cost $511,000 The City has traditionally allocated $55,000 per year towards bituminous sealcoating. 1 1 I Justification Prior Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 181,000 I Construction/Inspection 60,500 60,500 60,500 60,500 66,000 308,000 Total Contingencies 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 22,000 Total 66.000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 330,000 Prior . Funding Sources' 2006 2007 2008' 2009 2010 Total 181,000 I Local Street Reconstruction 66,000 66,000 66,000 . 66,000 66,000 330,000 Total Total 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 330,000 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 44 1 Monday Seprember 12, 2005 I Project # LR-04-01 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority n1a Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction Fund # I Project Name Wedgewood Drive Overlay & Reconstruction L...._..._._._____ ----..-.....---.------.-..-.....-------..-...-.----.-.-.-.-.---..-.-...-...-.... I Description Total Cost $252,500 Includes overlay from Smithtown to Mallard Lane and reconstruction from Mallard Lane to the cul-de-sac. I I Justification I Prior 12,000 I Total 2006 212,450 28,050 240,500 Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies I Total 2010 I Prior 12,000 I Total Total Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction 2006 240,500 240,500 I 2007 2009 Total 212,450 28,050 240,500 2010 2008 2007 2008 2009 Total 240,500 240,500 I Project # LR-OS-Ol Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nJa Pro.iect Name Pavement Reclamation Wood Duck Circle Description Total Cost $96,500 I This project includes pavement reclamation from County Road 19 to the cul-de-sac. pstitication I I Fund # I Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction I Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Constructionllnspection Contingencies 2006 7,000 78,700 10,800 Total 96,500 2007 2008 2009 Total 96,500 96,500 I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction 2006 96,500 96,500 I Total I I I I IHonday Seprember 12. 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 7,000 78,700 10,800 96,500 2010 45 r.---.--..~._-'_._...__._.m___.__...._'_u_.__.._-_..~""".,,~..._.,.._...--,,_..~-_...._-_.-.--,.~-,...,...,..~.,..,,'....,..,. ... ._...--""~",."..-_..,---_.,,_.,.,""._,."._,_.._"--,,,_.,.___".."4_.. ._...,.._,,.,.4~.._ I Project # LR-OS-02 l:ro~~~Na~~._~~~~ty Road 19 E~~~~~~~~~!L___..._____.____..___...m._...._..__.___ Fund # Description North end sign and landscape for County Road 19 improvement Total Cost $10,000 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Categor-y Roadways/streets Priority nla I I Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction I I I Justification Expenditures Construction/Inspection Total 2006 10,000 10,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 I Total 10,000 10,000 2010 I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction Total 2006 10,000 10,000 2007 2009 Total 10,000 10,000 I 2008 Type Improvement Useful Life Ullassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction I .-....-..--.-..--...----------....--...--.-----.-....--..... --..---..--....--.-.---...-.......... .-...----...-.......-.....-..----.........\ Project # LR-06-01 Project Name Star Circle Reconstruction I i._.......___...._._...______.._._.._____....__...__.______--...-...-----...-.-..--..........--.-.-..--...-------.........-..------......-..-.--.. Fund # ~~- ~uction ~ Justification Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies Toml Cost $57,000 I I L I Total Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction Total Iltfollda." Seprelf!ber 12. 2005 2006 50,700 6,300 57,000 2008 2009 2007 2010 I Total 50,700 6,300 57,000 I 2006 57,000 57,000 2008 2009 2010 Total .. . 57,000 57,000 I 2007 46 I I I I I I 1-- ---.----- ..-----.- ------ ,..- -,------ u__ _n____ -- -- -----, - --- ---- - -- ----- - - - .- - - ----1 I Projcct # LR-06-02 'I' Project Name Star Lane Reconstruction I _~_~.....__._.______.~__._________._ ..,..~_ 04_' .... . _. ~ ___._._._.~._____.__ _.._....__ Fund It I I Description Reconstruction I VUSrifiCa'iOn I Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies I Total I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction Total I 2006 235,000 30,000 265,000 Total Cost $265,000 2007 2008 2009 Type Improvement Uscful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction 2010 Total 235,000 30,000 265,000 2007 2008 2009 Total Cost $27,000 2010 Total 265,000 265,000 Total 2006 27,000 27,000 2006 265,000 265,000 I [-;~Oje~~-;---LR:06-03------ -- ---- -- --------. - -- ---,-- - ---.--"---'- --- ,- ---- -- ------] Projcct Name Retaining Wall & Guardrail-Lk Linden DrNellowston 4""'_ _. _....___._____._. ___.. .___.. .-.____._..._.._..... ______.__._n._.._ - -- ..-....--.- . Fuud # I ..J I l Description I \ Justification Expenditures Construction/Inspection I I I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction I I I I I Monda." Sepr"mber 1::2.2005 Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Priority nJa Contact Public Works Director Department Local Street Reconstruction Total 2006 27,000 27,000 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009 47 1 2010 Total 27,000 27,000 .2010 Total 27,000 . 27,000 .........-.----.-....... ..-..---...-....--.-.-..-..---.---.......-.---..-.......-......--......--....-..-.-..--.-.......-.............-...............-.....-..-.-..........--.] Project It LR-06-04 Project Name Guardrail-Excelsior Blvd/Footprint Lk .~....,__.._.._,.__.._,,___.__._._.__N__ ' _.._...-~_._~.._~._---_.._-_."--,--_.~,._'_._.._..---_..- Fund It Description Total Cost $22,000 Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Priority cia Contact Public Works Director Departlll.ent Local Street Reconstruction I I I p ustification Expenditures Construction/Inspection Total 2006 22,000 . 22,000 2007 2008 2009 I 2010 Total 22,ooQ. 22,000 I 2010 I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction Total 2006 22,000 22,000 2007 2008 2009 ~~;~::t It--....--- LR-06:0S--.------.---.--.--.-.....--..---.--.-.-----.----"'--"-' Project Name Guardrail-Spring Circle ----------------------------~ Fund It ~. Description 1 Justification Expenditures Construction/Inspection Total Cost $24,000 Total 22,000 22,000 I Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Local Street Reconstruction I I I J ~I Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction MO/lday Sepcember 11, 2005 Total 2006 24,000 24,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 I Total 24,000 24,000 Total 2006 24,000 24,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 24,000 24,000 I I 48 I I I I I I . .......... . ...--...--....--....----......---.... ...... ......_--... .---....- -.-.--.....-...... '-" -........ .........-.....-.......----...-....--. ....... ....-....-.. -'-'--1 I Project ## LR-06-06 . I Project Name Relocate Retaining Wall-Maple LnlShady Island 1 ... ..-.--------..--.....--.-......--.-....-.----.--...... ...............--...--..-....--.-........- .....---.-- -..---. Fund If 1 Description Total Cost $22,000 Type improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Locai Street Reconstruction I. ~JUstification Expenditures Constructionllnspection I Total 2010 Total 22,000 22,000 1 Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction 1 Total ....--..-.......--..........---------------.-.............--..-.--.....----......--.................-.........-...-..-....-...... .-..........1 [project## LR-07-01 \ Project Name Beverly Dr Pavement Reclamation -.-..-..---.. -.-'''-'- --........-.....--.--..-............ --- .....--...-.--.---.--....-.............--...-.--. -..--......-.--..-...- --.-......... -......-.-.-........-..- Fund it 1 I I 2006 22,000 22,000 2007 2008 2009 2006 22,000 22,000 2007 2008 2009 Description Tot:ll Cost $82,000 This project includes pavement reclamation from Cathcart Drive to the cul-de-sac. 1_ 1 ~tification Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection I Total I Funding Sources . Local Street Reconstruction 1 Total 1 1 1 1 I MmtdCl)' Si:'pri:'mb~r 1:?, 2005 2010 Total 22,000 22,000 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction 2006 2007 8,000 74,000 82,000 2008 2009 l 2010 Total 8,000 74,000 82,000 2006 2007 82,000 82,000 2008 2009 2010 Total . 82,000 82,000 49 Total Cost $400,000 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nJa Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction I ....--...--.--.----.--....--.-----.---...........--.-...----......----.-...--.-...--......-.-.-.---...--..---...-.-......"..-----1 ~~# ~m~ I Project Name Street Reclamation Projects ..-.._-_.-._------_.._-_.,_...._._~- ._".'.'~"_.._---_.~-....-_..-'.'....._...__.'--_..'."."-...-.-,..-..-..---,-.........---.--.-.-----.-.. Fund # I Description 1 Vustification Expenditures Construction/Inspection J I 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 I 2006 Total Funding Sources Local Street Reconstruction I Total I Description Total Cost $150,000 This project includes pavement reclamation from Mill Street to the cul-de-sac. Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Roadways/streets Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Local Street Reconstruction I .-...--.....-....--....-......--.-.-..-.-...-.---........-.---.---......-..---...--.--...-..-.....................-..---.---.-.-.---..--.-.......--\ Project # LR-OS-Ol Project Name Bracketts Rd Pavement Reclamation ] ._,.,.._".._,_..._.."......_,.,,_._,.__..,.____.._~_. ._.__ ._..."__.'" _...... .............____..._...._.._.........__..._......_.._..u._..'.__._.~,...._,_____.._._._..._....""__.... Fund # I I ~tification Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/! nspection 2006 2007 2008 11,000 139,000 150,000 2009 2010 Total Funding Sources Local Street" Reconstruction' 2006 2007 2008 150,000 150,000 2009 2010 Total Munday Seprembl!/" 11, 2005 50 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D. MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROADWAYS Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways are collector routes throughout the City that have been designated by the City and reviewed and approved by the State as MSA eligible routes. The Minnesota Department of Transportation's Office of State Aid provides gas tax dollars, collected at the gas pump, to municipalities that have a population in excess of 5,000. These funds are to be used to build, reconstruct, and maintain MSA. routes. The intent of the state aid system is to insure that a uniform network of roadways exists as a motorist travels throughout the metropolitan area. The amount of MSA routes that a municipality may designate is a maximum of 20 percent of City's total roadway length. For the City of Shorewood, this equates to just over 9.1 miles of roadway. Table 2 below lists the current designated MSA routes. MSA Route From To Mileage Smithtown Rd. Victoria Border Country Club Rd. 1.91 Howards Pt. Rd. Smithtown Rd. Edqewood Rd. 0.78 Edgewood Rd. Howard's Pt. Rd. Grant Lorenz Rd. 0.72 Country Club Rd. Yellowstone Trail Trunk Hiqhway 7 0.44 Yellowstone Trail Country Club Rd. Lake Linden Dr. 1.26 Lake Linden Dr. Yel\owstone Tr. Trunk Hiqhway 7 0.29 Old Market Rd. Trunk Hwy 7 Covington Rd. 0.45 Covinqton Rd. Old Market Rd. Vinehill Road 0.43 Vinehill Road Broms Boulevard Townline Road 1.38 Total 7.66 Table 2 It should be noted that the MnDOT Office of State Aid allows municipalities to use the dollars held in an account at the State on a reimbursement basis. In addition, the state will allow cities to borrow a maximum of three times the annual construction allotment received by the City to complete a project. All design, construction, and documentation must adhere to MSA rules to be eligible for reimbursement. 51 Department Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEP ARTtvIENT 2006 thru 2010 Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Municipal State Aid Streets Vine Hili Road. MRI and Overlay CR 19 Intersection Realignment Yellowstone Tran . Bit Overlay Municipal State Aid Streets Total GRAND TOTAL IIt/mulay September 12. 2005 MSA-oS-GS MSAOS-GS MSA.04-o1 o o o 3,981,200 72,000 104,000 104,000 3,981,200 72,000 4,053,200 104,000 4,157,200 4,053,200 104,000 4,157,200 52 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category State Aid Roadways Priority n/a Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $104,000 Departnlent Municipal State Aid Streets The City of Minnetonka has indicated that they would like to enter into a cooperative MSA project to mill and overlay Vine Hill Road. Both Cities share Vine Hill Road as a common corporate boundary. II;:j:;~-.-w.A-03-05----------------- --~._-----II l Project Name Vine Hill Road - Mill and Overlay I ..-....-..-...-----------..-.-..-......--.....-..............__........_............._..._.___...._.___J Fund It I I I Justification Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2009 I 2006 2007 2008 I Total I 2006 Funding Sources MSA Funding 2007 2008 2009 Total 2010 Total 3,000 3,000 88,000 88,000 13,000 13,000 104,000 104,000 2010 Total 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 I I ~ I Project It MSA03-06 I Project Name CR 19 Intersection Realignment Fund It I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category State Aid Roadways Priority nla I Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $5,241,200 Department Municipal State Aid Streets This project includes right of way acquisition, realignment of the County Road 19 intersection, stormwater design. and streetscape construction. I \ Justification I Prior I 1,260,000 I Total 2006 2008 2009 Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies Streetscape Improvements . Landscape Improvements 2007 I Total 3,981,200 I Prior \ 5,241,200 I Total Funding Sources MSA Advance/(Repay) 2006 -181,000 -181,000 2007 -181,000 -181,000 Total 2008 -181,000 -181,000 2009 2010 Total 3,088,000 650,000 143,200 100,000 3,981,200 2010 Total -543,000 -543,000 I I I I MOl1day September /2. 2005 53 .-------..---.-..-------- -...-...-....-.....--...--..............-..--..--.-------.-..------.-.--....-...-....-.......-..--...........-.--.-.---.] Project # MSA-04-01 Pro,jectName Yellowstone Trail- Bit Overlay ._,.__...M_.......,.~.__.-..__.,-~.-..-~-..,-._-----------.--,~---_._.,._--.-..-,-----------._._- Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category State Aid Roadways Priority n/a I I Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $72,000 Department Municipal State Aid Streets I This project includes the overlay of Yellowstone Trail from Minnetonka Drive to Lake Linden, due to watermain construction. f Justification I Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection Right-of-way 2006 1,000 . 1,000 70,000 72,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 1,000. 1,000 70,000 72,000 I Total I Funding Sources MSA Funding 2006 72,000 72,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 72,000 72,000 I Total I I I I I I I I I I I 54 I MOTrday Seprember 12. 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E. MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE The City of Shorewood has 1,500 individual service connections to the municipal water system. Other residents obtain water through individual residential wells. The City of Shorewood operates and maintains five separate well houses, with a total of seven wells to service the customers. For reference, the following table provides some basic information of the City's systems. Facility Well Aquifer Depth of Year Reserve Name No. Well (Ft) Installed ,Badger 1 Shakopee- 372 1981 Minnewashta Water Tower Jordan Boulder 1 Franconia- 640 1981 Minnewashta Water Tower Bridqe Iron -Gale 2 Franconia- 640 1981 Minnewashta Water Tower Iron -Gale S.E. Area 1 Jordan 415 1987 VVaterford VVater Tower Amesbury 1 St. Peter - 528 1973 5000 Gal Hydro- Jordan pneumatic Tank 2 Shako pee 326 1982 5000 Gal Hydro- pneumatic Tank VVoodhaven 1 Shakopee- 480 1979 4000 Gal Hydro- Jordan pneumatic Tank The Amesbury and Woodhaven wells are hydro-pneumatic systems. These types of systems are designed for a small neighborhood system. The MN Department of Health recommends that the number of connections served by these types of systems should not exceed twenty-five. The current number of connections exceeds this amount. The. Badger Field and Boulder Bridge well houses 'are interconnected via afrunk watermain on Smithtown Road to the Minnewashta Water Tower. This tower is located at 26352 Smithtown Road, on the Minnewashta Elementary School property by way of an easement. This structure has a capacity of 500,000 gallons. The water servicing this area' is not treated, with the exception of the addition of chlorine and fluoride. The Southeast area well is connected to the Waterford water tower located at 5500 Old Market Road. This structure is located on City property and has a capacity of 400,000 gallons. Water from this well is treated for iron removal, along with the addition of chlorine, and fluoride prior to delivery to the distribution system. 55 I [;:::.~--:~:;~:~~ ::!~~~~t ~-"~~~-~-_--~~=~_-~-_- I Fund# 601 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer II Description Total Cost $174,500 Department Municipal Water System This project proposes to interconnect the Woodhaven Well with the City of Excelsior's or the City of Chanhassen 's water system. I Vustification I Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Land Acquisition & Easements Construction/Inspection Contingencies I Total I Funding Sources Water Revenue Bonds-2005 Total 2006 20,000 . 10,000 126,500 18,000 174,500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,000. 10,000 126,500 18,000 174,500 2006 174,500 174,500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 174,500 174,500 I I Project # W -03-06 Project Name Water Meter Radio Read Project I Fund 1# 601 I Description Total Cost $210,000 This project includes conversion of all water meters to a radio read system. Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Distribution Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Municipal Water System Prior Expenditures 2006 I o I Water System Improvement 210,000 Total Total 210,000 I Prior Funding Sources 2006 o I Water Revenue Bonds-2005 210,000 I Total Total 210,000 I I I I Monday Sepremba J 2, 2005 I I Justification 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 210,000 210,000 2007 2009.. 2010 Total 210,000 210,000 2008 57 -----.----------...----......-..---.--....--..-----.--------.--..-.-.-.---...-....---.--..-......----............--'..-..-]' Project # W -04-08 Project Name Amesbury Polyphosphate System w__.....___._._.______..._.__.__._.......__.._._.____.'-..------.--...-....------..............--..".,.......---.-.-----..----.-- Fund 11= 601 Description Total Cost $12,100 Department Municipal Water System The Minnesota Department of Health is mandating tbe addition of polyphosphates to the Amesbury system to sequester the lead in the home piping. I Justification Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer I I I I Expenditures Construction/Inspection Total Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund Total Description Replace controls for Amesbury Well facility II ustification I ~ -. 2006 12,100 12,100 2008 2009 2010 Total 12,100 12,100 I 2007 2006 12,100 12,100 2009 2010 I 2007 2008 Total 12,100 12,100 I r;~:ject~- - W -0-5:02 --- ---..--------- ----...-- - --- -_._.-~-- -----------] I..~~~!~~~_~~~~__~.~~~~u~y ~~ll C~~~~~~s_~eJ~~_cem~~~_n__.__ .._____.._...... m_________ Fund 11= ToM Cost"$7S,OOO T}'Pe Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Municipal Water System I I 1 I I Expenditures Construction/I nspection Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund Monday Sl!pEl!mb(~r /2. 2005 Total 2006 75,000 75,000 2008 2009 2007 2010 Total 75,000 75,000 I Total 2006 75,000 75,000 2008 2009 2010 I 2007 Total 75,000 75,000 I 58 I I I I I I 1-."""-""""..."-"....__._-'-_..._-'-"""-_._--"_..,, ."--"-."".""-,-,-"",-"""""."""-."".""-"""",,-,,.-,,,,-,,.-,,,-,,,-",--....--''"''"''".''-''""-,-.-.'',,,----''----''.-'',,--... I projcct It W -05-03 ProjectName Boulder Bridae Submersible Well- Pull & Inspect -- -- ,,---,--,_._----,,--~-,,----,---"""""--_._-------_._-,,---,-"-,,-,,-------,,-"",,,--,,----_._---- Fundlt 601 I I I I Expenditures Constructionllnspection Contingencies 2008 2009 I Total 2006 18,000 3,000 21,000 2007 Type Improvement Useful Life 5 yrs Category Water: Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer 2010 Total 18,000 3,000 21,000 Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund 2008 2009 Description Total Cost $21,000 Department Municipal Water System This project includes pulling, inspection and repair of the Boulder Bridge Well Itllineshaft well. Pumps are to be pulled and inspected on a S-year rotation" I Justitication I Total 2006 21,000 21,000 2007 I I 1"--""",,"",,,-_...,,-,,-,,,,----,,",,----""---------''''_._''-------,,,"-.-----,,.--""".,,.- .---,..,,'''-''-'--...,,''''.----------''] Project I/: W -06-01 I Project Name S.E. Area Lineshaft Well - Pull & Inspect l..""_"_,,.__."",, ,..."",_,,,...,,,_.,,__.._,,,....,_,,,,__,,_."_,,,,,,,". ,,-,,-,,"- -,---,,-. .--"--.""----,-.-.",,,-,,,-,,,,,----,,...-.-,,-,"".,,,, ."-"----,,--,,-.--,,-"",,--,,""-,,-,...--"".", ,..".-.""",,,""... FundI/: 601 I I I I Expenditures 2006 2007 Constructionll nspection 19,000 Contingencies 3,000 Total 22,000 Funding Sources 2006 2007 Municipal Water Fund 22,000 Total 22,000 2008 2009 2008 2009 I 2010 Total 21,000 21,000 Type Improvement Useful Life 5 yrs Category Water: Wells Priority nla 2010 2010 Total 19,000 3,000 22,000 Total 22,000 22,000 Contact Engineer ~escriPtion I Total Cost $22,000 Department Municipal Water System ,This project includes pulling, inspection and repair of the SE Area lineshaft pump. Pumps are to be pulled and inspected on a S-year rotation. .- _--..J \ Justification ~ l I I I I I t\llonday Seprember 12. 2005 59 1-';:~~~~-;-'---W-07~01 ._.___.____._u__...._ --.-.-.-..-- .. --.. .. .._-... ----.---...--.-.-...] l~~~~~~~e Interco~~~~~~~~_~!~mesb.~:y & SE ~!ea Wel~__.____.____._._.__. Fund # I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Wells Priority nla I Contact Engineer I Description Total Cost $626,400 Department Municipal Water System Extend a 12-ineh main along St. Alban's Bay Road and Manor Road approx 3200 feel. Assume a cost of $14-5 per lineal foot: $464,000 I Justification I Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 556,800 69,600 626,400 2007 2008 2009 Total 2010 Total 556,800 69,600 626,400 I I Funding Sources Water Revenue 8onds-2005 2006 626,400 626,400 2007 2008 2009 Total 2010 Total 626,400 626,400 I ...-........-------..--..-.--"...-......----...-.---..------.-----....--.....--------------------..-.-] Project # W -07 -02 l....~"'~~~~~-'?' L~~~!I!.~l'lII~&~~_______________ Fund it I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Water: Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer I I Description . Total Cost $22,000 Department Municipal Water System Project includes pulling, inspection and repair of the Amesbury Iineshaft pump. Pumps are to be pulled and inspected on a S-year rotation. \ Justitication Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 2007 2008 19,000 3,000 22,000 2009 Total I 2010 Total 19,000 3,000 22,000 I Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund 2006 2007 2008 22,000 22,000 2009 I Total " 20io Total 22,000 22,000 I I ltilmzday Sepr~mber n. 2005 60 I I I I I r;~:j-~~~~--'..'--w~o~;~ol-.'-_.--- -- -...-------.-.-..-----...--......-.-------...--..........,,--. t :~~ect_~~~e-.~-~~~~~r..~~~~e yv ~~ #2 -~~!_~.!~~P~~:... .__ ___.____.___.______.____.__. I Fund # 601 Type Improvement Useful Life 5yrs Category Water. Wells Priority nla Contact Engineer I I Description Total Cost $21,045 Department Municipal Water System . project includes pulling, inspection and repair of Boulder Bridge well #2 lineshaft pump. Pumps are to be pulled and inspected on a 5-year rotation. I f Justification Expenditures Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 2007 2008 2009 18,300 2,745 21,045 I Total 2010 Total 18,300 2,745 21,045 2010 Total 21,045 21,045 I Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund 2006 2007 2008 2009 21,045 21,045 I Total I Project # W-I0-0l I Project Name Water System Improvements Fund # 601 Type Improvement UsefulLife Unassigned Category Water. Wells Priority nla I Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $100,000 Department Municipal Water System project includes pulling, inspection and repair of the Badger linesllaft pump. Pumps are to be pulled and inspected on a S-year rotation. I I Justification J I Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Municipal Water Fund 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 I I I I I I I I /\I[ollda." seprember 12, 2005 61 en N -f J: H (J) -0 ~ ij) m H Z -I m Z ;:t o z ~ r ~ r m -n -f ro r- ~ Z ^ ------------------- - V) ~ CL. ~ a.. C ;: l\) o...s::l\)o C of- > of- ~-o.,g-o -0 l\) l\) tns:C-tnC ...s:: 0 0 of- \4- ~ I- tn l\) ~ l\) L. -0 > "....,-0 o . l\) l\) 0 s: C- tn l\) -0 L. l\) C +- C ,.. c.. l\) o C .... l\)l\)l\)~..o -OEL....s::L.l\) l\) l\) ::J +- 0 > tn > +- C C- 0 ::J 0:.0 o-o...s:: u L. C '- l\) tn .e E ~.~ ~ .~ tn XEC-Ol o l\) l\) E 0 l\) ...s:: L.+- 5 -a 0 c.. 0 C of- of- ~ l\) L. o U .- .::t:. tn +- tn ::J C- L. l\) tn tnL.Oo..s:+- E of- U a.. of- C E~~l\)-o~ L. .- ..s: s: ft\ 8't::L.l-oQ-. .::t:. ~ EO L. L. tn 0 c: 00-0 E L. 0 l\) 0.. c: l\) l\) Ol:E..o l\)E~+-~J2 ~ -0 "> l\) 0.. t '0 C ft\ U +- 0 > tn ~ 0 L: c: s: C- 0 L. c: tn 0 El\) l\) tn 2 .~ 0 ~ L. l\) >-+- 3:+- ~ tn ~ ;::8-tC:~~5 l\) ::J 0 EO c.. i:: tn \4- -0 c.. E'- l\) +- l\)...... L. tn ~..s: '" I-t -0 o of- U l\) _ l\) l\) c.. c: 0 of- 0 -0 ..s: l\) l\) &.:t: ::J of- ~ ~ L.~"o g- g ~ of- Ol l\) ".f= ~ . - ::J L. 0 E c: .::t:. c: of- l\) C E t1 L. l\) tn > 0 ::J L. 0 l\) l\) OEtnoa....o..o . u. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M co - - Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT ',2006 thru 2010 Department Project# Priority 2006 2008 2007 Parks Park Improvements P-04-03 0 5,000 5,000 ,5,000 Badger Park - Resurface tennis courts p.Qa.Q1 0 20,000 Badger Park-Football and Hockey Lighting P-Q6-02 0 45,000 SilvelWood Park-Erosion Control p-Oa-Q3 0 8,000 Skate Park-Equipment Rehabilitation P-Q6-Q4 0 3,500 Minnewashta Dog Park-Matching Funds P.06-05 0 5,000 Freeman Park-Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station P-Q6-06 0 12,000 Skate Park-Drinking Fountain P-Qa-07 0 12,000 Manor Park-Manor Park Pond WA Quality Improvements p-Qe-Q8 0 5,000 Cathcart Parks-Resurface Tennis Court P.07-Q1 0 14,000 Freeman Park-Weiland Enhancement/Interpretive Cen P.07.02 0 428,000 Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area P.08.01 0 25,000 Parks Total 115,500 447,000 30,000 GRAND TOTAL 115,500 447,000 30,000 2009 5,000 I I I I 2010 Total 5,000 25,000 20,000 45,000 8,000 3,500 5,000 12,000 12,000 5,000 14,000 428,000 25,000 I I I I I 602,500 I I I 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 602,500 Mnllday Seplember 12,2005 64 I I I I I I I 11-;r:~:;--"-'''P~04=O;--------''--''-,--, -, , -, ,_.,'.-.,'-..,....-..._,-~--~---" -~~l t~ro.i~ct ~~~e...!~~~ IlI!~r~~~~e~~~__.,..__._.___ __..___......____.______ .___. I Fund # Total Cost $30,000 Typc Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Parks I Description I I Justification l Prior Expenditures 2006 I 5,000 I Construction/Inspection 5,000 Total Total 5,000 I Prior Funding Sources 2006 5,000 I Park Foundation Donations 5,000 I Total Total 5,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 I [ "---.--..---------..-"..-....,----'--'-'------------....-.-..-----'.-.----'-.-...----.---1 Project # P-06-01 Project Namc Badger Park - Resurface tennis courts .__.....____.._.......'_.....' ..___,..,.._____..,___.._____.__....,.,.._,__._._......".....__..'..'_..,_.._,..,....._......._._.__._..._ ..___..________....1 Fund # 402 I Description Resurface two tennis courts in Badger Park. Total Cost $20,000 Type Unassigned Useful Life 5 yrs Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Department Parks I I I Justification Expenditures Resurfacing tennis court I 2006 20,000 20,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,000 20,000 Total I Funding Sources Park Fund 2006 20,000 20,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,000 20,000 I Total I I I I I MVllday September 12.2005 65 ---------...------.-----. -----.. --. --- .... --.-..-..---- - -----...-] r-project# P-06-02 I Project Name Badger Park-Football and Hockey Lighting '---..--.--------.---- -.----------.---.-.---.---...---- Fund # 402 Description Total Cost $45,000 Field lighting replacement at Badger Field. Replacement of 40 foot poles and 150 pounds light fixtures_ f Justification Expenditures EquipNehicles/Fumishings Total 2006 45,000 45,000 2009 2007 2008 Type Equipment Useful Life 15 yrs Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Department Parks 2010 Total 45,000 45,000 Funding Sources Park Fund 2008 2009 Total 2006 45,000 45,000 2007 1~~;:~--P-06:03.----._-...-.-----._...--------.-------.-----..--...-----. I Project Name Silverwood Park-Erosion Control ._...._____._,_,_,,~..,,_..._~_...._._..'.._.____.__._._.,_._______.....___.__..__...,._._._,.____._._......._..._."_._',_.,N__'__~___" __.._.._._.._.__.__....__..._. Fund # 402 2010 Total 45,000 45,000 Type Improvement Useful Life 5 yrs Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Description Total Cost $8,000 Department Parks Erosion Control near Giant Slides in Silverwood Park. Staff recommends that special earth stabilization products, be used_ I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I Justification Expenditures Construction/lnspection 2008 Total 2006 8,000 8,000 2007 2009 2010 Total 8,000 8,000 Funding Sources Park Fund 2008 2009 Total 2006 8,000 . 8~000 2007 {Honda." September 12. 2005 66 2010 Total 8,000 8,000 I ~...__.-.,,,-,...,~_._..._._..._._..-._......._-,.._,.__.._._..-.._.._.._._..__.._-'",,'_.------_...~...__.._--.-.,_.~-,,,---'---'-.'..'-'-'-_.--'---"~+'----""'-"----"'. Type Improvement Useful Life 5yrs Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Department Parks Project # P-06-04 I .. --.--.-------. Project Name Skate Park-Equipment Rehabilitation Fund # 402 I Description Total Cost $3,500 Various structural repairs need to be completed to the railing, facia. and side boards of the equipment at Skate Park. I ~ Justification Expenditures Maintenance 2006 3,500 3,500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 3,500 3,500 I Total I Funding Sources Park Fund 2006 3,500 3,500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 3,500 3,500 I Total I 1....-....-.-..--.---..-.-...........--...--............-.-.--.--.---...----..-..---........--....-.....---..--.........."-.-'..-'] I Project # P-06-0S I Project Name Minnewashta Dog Park-Matching Funds I ..."..-....-.-- ....-....-,,---.-...----..-..-....-..---.--.-....--~-_..-_.-".---..-.---.......--.--................---.--..----........-...." Fund # 402 I Type Unassigned Useful Life Unassigned Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Description Total Cost $5,000 Department Parks The Park commission recommended a 2006 donation of matching funds for the design of the Minnewashta Dog Park. The park will built by the Carver County Parks District. I \ Justification I I I Expenditures 2006 Constructionllnspection 5,000 Total 5,000 Funding Sources 2006 Park Fund 5,000 Total 5,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 I I 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 I I I I I Monday September 11. 2005 67 r;~~~~~-;--'-'-P-06=06--'-"-----'---'-----"'--'--..-...----.-----..-.---...--....--.-----.-- .--....--.-- I Project Name Freeman Park-Drinking Fountain at Eddy Station L___.._____..._____.._.__.._._._.__._......__...._..._......_-.--..-.-------..-....---..---.... Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $12,000 Department Parks When Eddy Station was constructed, provisions were placed w/I the interior of the building to hang a drinking fountain outside, under the canopy portion of the building. . .. . \ Justification I I I I Expenditures Water System Improvement Park Funds 2006 6,000 6,000 12,000 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 12,000 I I Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund Park Fund 2006 6,000 6,000 12,000 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 12,000 I I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Engineer Description J Total Cost $12,000 Department Parks Over the years, the Park Comminssion has heardseveral requests regarding the desire to have a drinking fountain installed at the skate park. The high energy sport creates the need for constant hydration of participants. Staff is pleased to report that watermain has been extended pas the site, with a water service and fire hydrant installed into the Southshore Community Park, as part of the Barrington Subdi vision constructed in 2005. Therefore, costs for installation of the fountain can be limited to location of a concrete foundation pad, minor extension of the water service, and placement of the drinking fountain. \ Project # P-06-07 I Project Name Skate Park-Drinking Fountain I Fund # I Justification Expenditures Water System Improvement Park Funds I I I I 2006 6,000 6,000 12,000 .. Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 12,000 . . I I Funding Sources Municipal Water Fund Park Fund 2006 6,000 6,000 12,000 Total 2007 2009 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 12,000 I 2008 I Monda." September 12. 2005 68 I I I I ... .-.-..---------.-....--..-.---....--...-----.-.-.---...--..--..--......-.--..-............---......-----.---......----..--..-..----..-....1 I Project # P-06-08 I Project Name Manor Park-Manor Park Pond W A Quality Improvements I .. ....----.---.-------.------.-.---.-------------......----------...----- Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Engineer I Description Total Cost $5,000 Department Parks Park Commission has undertaken a water quality component wlin the parks. While still in its infancy, water testing is currently being completed to assist the city in making informed decisions to improve the water quality of Manor Park Pond. Staff is recommending that $5000 be ear marked for a future improvement. I \ Justification I Expenditures 2006 Water System Improvement 5,000 Total 5,000 Funding Sources 2006 Municipal Water Fund 5,000 Total 5,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 I 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 5,000 I I \ ~ \ Project # P-07 -01 I Project Name Cathcart Parks-Resurface Tennis Court Fund # I I Description Total Cost .$14,000 I Cathcarth Park has a single tennis court that is showing signs of deterioration and needs crack repairs and resurfacing. I r~UStifiCatiOn 1- I Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings Total 2006 2007 14,000 14,000 . 2008 2009 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Parks 2010 Total 14,000 14,000 I Funding Sources Park Fund 2006 2007 14,000 14,000 2008 2009 2010 Total 14,000 14,000 I Total I I I I I t'v[ollday Sepwmber f2. 2005 69 .-.-.-.--....--...--..-.-.---.-..---.--.---..-.--.---....-....-.........-----..---....-....-.-.....-..-.-........-.---'--'J- [Project It P-07 -02 Project Name Freeman Park- Wetland Enhancement! Interpretive Cen . -_.__._.__.-.~.._._-,-,--~_._'_._.._.,------'_.._-_.,-._---_.._--"-,------,_.~,_._._..._._..._.._.._- Fund It I Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Park improvements Priority n/a I Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $428,000 Department Parks I Freeman Park WEIC was presented at the previous Conunissioners thought it to be a viable project, if altemative-furtding sources can be obtained. Efforts at this time are to seek out grants and funding mercbanisms. . I Justification I Expenditures 2006 Grant Money Stormwater Management Fund Wetland Enhancementllnterpr Total 2007 342,400 42,800 42,800 428,000 2008 2009 2010 Total 342,400 42,800 42,800 428,000 I I Funding Sources 2006 Donations Grant Money Stormwater Management Fund Total 2007 42,800 342,400 42,800 428,000 2008 2009 2010 Total 42,800 342,400 42,800 428,000 I I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned 'Category Park improvements Priority nfa Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $25,000 Department Parks Parents and onlookers of participants using the skate park are often noticed waiting in their cars or forced to si t on top of the wooden picnic tables that are on site. r-" I Project It P-08-01 ~rOject Name Skate Park-Plaza Picnic Area Fund It I I I I lJUstification Expenditures Infrastructure Skate Park Grant Money Park Funds 2006 Total 2007 2008 8,333 8,334 8,333 25,000 2009 2010 Total 8,333 8,334 8,333 25,000 I I Funding Sources Donations Grant Money Park Fund 2006 Total 2007 2008 8,333 8,334 8,333 25,000 2009 2010 Total 8,333 8,334 8,333 25,000 I I Monday S~ptl!mbl!r 12. 2005 70 I I I ... z w :E 0.. H ::> a w w tJ H LL LL o D Z < \/) w ~ H ...J H \J < u.. tJ !:I en ::> 0.. - . ~ U t.. ~ _ 0 U ..D 0 -, s:: ::r (j (j C-Ec ~~~ o +- c c -8 oa o 0- E +- ::r U 0 ~ ~ +- 0- +--0:2 ~ c ::J 5 0 .0 U -0 ~ -0 c U c ::r ~ O~4- C ~ 0 0Q1 t >- ~ t.. +- ~ (j .- -0 C-U ~ ~ -0 ..s:: ~ c +- 0 0 t.. t.. ~ o ~ t.. ~-O:J ~ s:: +- ~ :J C -o-Ot.. > ~ ::J o +-4- t.. g ~ C-Olu -0 0- .- _~4- .... ~ 4- ::J -0 0 4- ~ VI >- +- ~ -0 C ._ 0 ~ ;t:~E ou"O.9- (j +- :J lLoO- U c ~ _ VI t.. .0 ~ ~ ..... +- 0 ....+-:JVI a.. 0- -0 ~ U E ~ ..s:: 0 0 ~ I-4-UC - - - VI Ol 0 t.. C t.. ~ +- 0- 0 +- VI :g 4- 5- L 05 E ~..o ~ 0 ~ .- U ~g-oV) +- :J ->- ~..DG -0 +- V) ~V)~~ ~ c 5 ..s:: 1:E3: ~-o ~4- -oOU::r~ ~.DVI(j c U ::r s:: +- ~4-a.. ~V) .04- o~ ~o~+-o >>-+-~~ o +- 0 t.. s:: ..s:: ~ +- 0 ~ +- ~ ~ :t: Ou ~..s::-o~4- +- +- (j Ol~ 5, C ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0- ~ U 0 ;:J 0 +- ~ Ol 0 O(l 02 -g 5 ~ ~1JOVlt.. ::r s:: 0 - 0.. s:: t.. 0 +- 0 oa +- .- ~ +- E ~ :t: ..S! +- o-O~~ ~ U -0 ..s:: E GJ~OI- .l: t.. c ~ +- t.. 0 0 0 V)oV)~~ ~(\) .0] -o-gV)~ -0 0 0 -u c s:: E U .2 ~ ~~~~5 VI GJ U 3: ~ ~ +- '={:'=E~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- r- - - 2006 thru 2010 I I I Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Public Facilities/Office Equip Computer Upgrades PF.03-0S 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Civil Defense Sirens PF.Q5.05 0 25,000 25,000 Network (Computer) Upgrade PF-Q6.01 0 17,250 17,250 City Hall Project PF.OS.02 0 3,300,000 3,300,000 Public Works Addition (Bay wllift) PF-06.03 0 60,000 340,000 400,000 Document Retrieval System Upgrades PF.06-04 0 10,000 10,000 City Hall Generator P F-Q6.05 0 16,000 16,000 Public Works Building Generator PF.OS-Q6 0 38,000 3B,000 Public Facilities/Office Equip Total 159,000 3,667,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 3,856,250 GRAND TOTAL 159,000 3,667,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 3,856,250 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 72 I I MrllLday September J 2. 2005 II.... -....--..-------.. ..-..---....-.---...--..-....--..............--..--...-..-....-.- .--.----......---...............-...-......-.......-.-...--....-..................-.] Project # PF -03-06 .~~_~~~ ~~~~. C~~~~ter_.Epgrad~~__.___. _. _________....__..._._.__._._____.._._ ..____ .._.___.J I Fund# 401 Type Equipment Useful Life 5 yrs Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla Contact Finance I Description Total Cost $70,000 Department Public Facilities/Office Equip This project proposes to replace obsolete computer hardware and software systems (approximately three workstations per year). I Justification Computer equipment replacement. Prior Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total I 20,000 I Computer workstations 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Total Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I Prior Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 20,000 I Public Facilities/Office Equipm 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I Total Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 I I Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla Contac.t Engineer Department Public Facilities/Office Equip ._----~ Project # PF~05-05 Project Name Civil Defense Sirens Fund # I \ Description ~ \ Justification Prior Expenditures o I EquipNehicles/Furnishings Total Cost $25,000 I Total 2006 25,000 25,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 25,000 25,000 I Total I Prior Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 01 Public Facilities/Office Equipm 25,000 I Total Total 25,000 Total 25,000 25.000 I I I I I Monday September 17., 2005 73 [;:~;~~;:~ (Co~puter)-~~gr~d~=___. Fund if 401 .....-.....--.................--..-.-.-......., Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority nia Contact Engineer Department Public Facilities/Office Equip I I Description Total Cost $17,250 This project proposes to replace the computer network on a 5 year basis. I I Justification I Prior Expenditures 2006 2007 0.1 Computer workstations 17,250 Total Total 17,250 Funding Sources 2006 2007 Public Facilities/Office Equipm 17 ,250 Total 17,250 2008 2009 2010 Total 17,250 17,250 I 2008 2009 2010 Total 17,250 17,250 I I 1-..-...-...-.....---.....-......---.........-.--.....--......................-....-----.-.-........------.-.-......-.----....--..--...---] Project if PF -06-02 Project Name City Hall Project l....__.___......._.._____...____.______.____.._...._.....______....--......--...--...-....-...---..-- ..-............-.--- Fund # Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority nia Contact Finance I I J II ----' "'---, I I Description Total Cost $3,300,000 Department Public Facilities/Office Equip The funding shown for this project shows the estimate for replacing City Hall. Further study may result in a decision to remodel City Hall, which presumably would have a lesser cost. \ Justification Expenditures 2006 2007 Construction/Inspection 3,300,000 Total 3,300,000 Funding Sources 2006 2007 G.O. Bonds-2007 wi City Hall 3,300,000 Total 3,300,000 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 Total I 3,300,000 3,300,000 Total I 3,300,000 3,300,000 I I I I I I Monday Seprember 12, 2005 74 I Project if PF -06-03 . _"'r_""'~"~'__'_"'_ ........_____~..,~___.._..........._........._.........._._.~..... _...........__..........._.._.H....'._._..__.........._..._......--..--..,..-....-........- _.....,~.__.._.~.. . ...~_...._."--_._-._.._.._~...-----. I Project Name Public Works Addition (Bay wffift) -....-.-..-..--..-.----.-..... Fund if I Description Total Cost $400,000 Type Improvement Uscful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priorit)' nla Contact Engineer Department Public Facilities/Office Equip I \ Justification Expenditures Construction/lnspection 2006 60,000 60,000 I Total 2008 2009 2010 Total 400,000 400,000 ...-......--...-......-...--..-..-.---.....---.----------...---.-..-.----------..-.-..-.--.-..-.....-.---..---...--........-..--'......-.-\ Project # PF -06-04 Project Name Document Retrieval System Upgrades I .....,........,_...^__..__._._..__.w.....__...~......._--.---.-.,.,..--..---.----....-...-.....-..-.-.-.--..----......_--"_..-....._.._..._.".~.."......-...-.-.-_._....-....-- .-".-..-.--..... Fund if I I Funding Sources G.O. Bonds-2007 w/ City Hall Total 2006 60,000 60,000 I I I \D~scription J I Document storage and retrieval system I I Justification I J I Expenditures Document Storage & retrieval Total 2006 10,000 10,000 2007 340,000 340,000 2008 2009 2010 Total 400,000 400,000 2007 340,000 340,000 Total Cost $10,000 Type Equipment Useful Life Unassigned Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla Contact Unassigned Depl\rtnlent Public Facilities/Office Equip ~ 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 10,000 10,000 I Funding Sources General Fund 2006 10,000 10,000 I Total I I I I I MO/lday Septem{7e!' 1'2. 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 10,000 10,000 75 [....-..'-----....----..---.----'----........-........'---..--'-,--...,...-..---..--.-..-.-,--"-.-,.......-,.,......---.,--.....-'-'.'..-...'--..-.--..'''1 I Project It PF -06-05 Project Name City Hall Generator l___..._....,..__..__.._.______,.__...____.___.____._..._,_.--,---.-..,.."..---------. Fund It 641 Description Purchase a generator for City Hall for use during power outages Total Cost $16,000 Type Improvement Useful Life 5 yrs Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Public Facilities/Office Equip I I I \ J u~tification Expenditures EquipN ehicleslFurnishings Total 2006 16,000 16,000 2008 2009 2010 I Total 16,000 16,000 I 2007 Funding Sources Public Facilities/Office Equipm Total 2006 16,000 16,000 2007 2009 2010 Total 16,000 16,000 I 2008 I ~;;;~-;;::~~B;~~~:ro~_-~~==-~=:] Fund It Description Purchase generator for the Public Works Building. Total Cost $38,000 I Type Equipment Useful Life 5 yrs Category Facilities/equipment Priority nla I Contact Engineer Departnlent Public Facilities/Office Equip I I Justification Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings Total I Funding Sources Pub.lic Facilities/Office Equipm Total lv{onda)' September 1'2, 2005 2006 38,000 38,000 2008 2009 2007 2010 Total 38,000 38,000 I 2006 38,000 38,000 2007 2009 2008 2010 Total 38,000 38,OOa . I I 76 I I I I I :E w l- V) ~ a. w ~ w V) >- a. ~ I- H Z < V) - E Q) +- V) >- V) t.. Q) ~ Q) V) >- L. o +- .2 o V) o 0.. U C ::J E Q) .c +- >- ..0 -0 l\) > L. l\) V) V) -0 o o ~ l\) L. o .c V) ~ o >- +- G Q) .c +- ~ o . :J: - <( ~ s:: ~ 0 +- .c - +- 0 3: 0.. d o +- .,. L. 0 v, +- V) Q) l\) Q) -=:f~ ~~:f ~ +- Q) 0 Q) V) +- l\) 0.. C ~ 9 (j .- - +- 0 (j ._ L. .J: s;;: -0 V) ~ >- s:: li) .- ~+->- o (j :t: tnE= Q) U .:!:: (j .e ::J ~ N~~ ..0 +- (j tn-l ~ >- l\) Q) tn ::J +--000 (j 0 . E 0 .- ~ V) ~ Q) l\) L. L. U 0.. 0 .> o...c t.. (j V) Q) V1~V) Q) 0 (j -0 >- +- ::J +- s;;: U 0- l\) c \J E Q) s:: E.c 0 Q) f- .~ +-> tn . s;;: ~~w o~ >- ..- 0 :t: t \J t; g Q) +- ::J .c'4-0 f-.:.=\J - - -oL.O s;;: 0 VJ (j'4-ti V) c+-+- o V) tn +- 0 ::J (j U E +- tn .- <( :: ..0 0 (j .cE'4- l\) Q) C L.+- c: ~ -g o V) (j +- L. o l\) c: t; ~ 0 Q) +- +- V) (j '4- >- L. L..:t: o 0- +-~ s:: ._ s:: o C V) ~ l\) +- ft' .J: 5 1: +- '4- +- ~ '4- 0 U Q) +- ::J c-o Q) t.. V) +- ~ 0'l...2 0 .~ 1: +- tn ::J U o ..... tn -o+- c: L. (j 0 '4- S::'4- V) 0 Q) +- >- 0 l\) :t: J= V) \J - (j l\) L. U c: ~ Q) c: .J: +- '4- o >..s::~ += .2 Q) ~ s:: +- E V) Q)u+-(j L. ::J (j Q) L. -0 l\) t.. ::J Q) t.. u \J L. +- c: - - - - - - - - - - - - - I'- I'- - - Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT 2006 thru.. 2010 Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2010 Total I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sanitary Sewer Infiltration and Inflow Reduction SS.03.Q5 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Uft Station 17 Rehabilitation SS.Q4.Q1 0 81 ,000 Lift Slation 16 Rehabilitation SS.05.Q2 0 25,000 79,000 Uft Station Pump Rebuilds and Mountings SS.06.Q1 0 30,000 Portable Lift Station Control Panel SS.Q6.02 0 6,000 Lift Station 12 Rehabilitation SS.Q7.Q1 0 19,000 91,000 Sanitary Sewer Total 192,000 148,000 141,000 50,000 GRAND TOT AI.. 192,000 148,000 141,000 50,000 2009 50,000 250,000 81,000 104,000 30,000 6,000 110,000 50,000 581,000 50,000 581,000 MOl/day September 12. 2005 78 I [=:_-==O~_and~::_~~U~~:--=-==-------J I Fund# 611 Type Improvement UseCul Life 5yrs Category Sanitary Sewer Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Sanitary Sewer I Description Total Cost $300,000 This item is an annual project to reduce the costs of infiltration and inflow. I I Justification Ii I Prior 50,000 I Total Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 I Total o 50,000 o 50,000 I Prior 50,000 I Total Funding Sources Sanitary Sewer Fund 2006 50,000 50,000 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 I I r......---.--.-......-------.--...-..-----.-..........--...--.....-..-.-...--.--.---.-......--.-.........-. Project # 88.04.01 I ProjectNarnc LiftStation 17 Rehabilitation ....._.___..._._...._.___._.-__....._-...__..__.._-_...____..____._._.__.._.....................__......_...._..____.~_.__.J Fund # .611 I I Description This project involves reconstruction of the wet well. control panels. Total Cost $103,000 Type Improvement Useful LiCe Syrs Category Sanitary Sewer Priority nJa Contact Engineer Department Sanitary Sewer \ Justification 'l Prior Expenditures 22,000 I Construction/Inspection Total Contingencies I 2006 72,000 9,000 81,000 I Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 8t,OOO 81,000 I Prior 22,000 I Total Funding Sources . Sanitary Sewer Fund 2006 81,000 81,000 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 72,000 9,000 81 ,000 I I I I I L'dollda..1' September 12.2005 79 [..-.....-........--..--.-----..--..-...-. -----...-.-.-...-....-.-.-.--.-...--....-.-.......-....----.-..-.....-..-......-.......-.. ----J.... Project # SS.05-02 Project Name Lift Station 16 Rehabilitation _.,-----_.._------_._----------_._.~_..'_..._"_._----.---,..--.-'.---.-----.--. Fund # 611 Description Total Cost $104,000 This project involves reconstruction of the wet well.and control panels. Type Improvement Useful Life 5 yes Category Sanitary Sewer Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Sanitary Sewer I I I I Justification Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2006 25.000 2007 2008 2009 69,500 9,500 79,000 Total 25,000 I 2010 Total 25,000 69,500 9,500 104,000 I I Funding Sources Sanitary Sewer Fund 2006 25,000 25,000 2009 2010 Total 104.000 104,000 I Total 2007 79,000 79,000 2008 1.......--...--.----..--.-.-.-...--.----.-..--....---.--..............-.--...----.-..------....-----...- I Project # SS.06.01 Project Name Lift Station Pump Rebuilds and Mountings ,...____._...____._____....._.._. .._________.'._____,~.'_......._______..__"___.._.7"._~._.__.__._____.__._______.._._.'0.__ Fund # Total Cost $30,000 I Description I Type Improvement Useful Life 15 yrs Category Unassigned Priority n/a Contact Public Works Director Department Sanitary Sewer I I I Justification Expenditures Maintenance 2008 2009 Total 2006 30,000 30,000 2007 2010 Total 30,000 30,000 I I Funding Sources Sanitary Sewer Fund 2006 30,000 30,000 2007 2008 2009 . Total 2010 . Total 30,000 30,000 I MO/lday Sepcember /::.. 2005 80 I I I I I I r-----.--..-...-.---..... .________________n__._________.___.________. -.--.-. _____no --.--.--- - -..--. I Project # 8S-06-02 L~~_o!ect Na~ !orta~!~_~!!~ ~~~~~~_~on_~rol_ Panel .________.________._ _ __ .u.__ I Fund # Total Cost $6,000 IteSCriPtion I (JUStification Expenditures EquipN ehicles/Fumishings 2006 6,000 6,000 2007 2008 2009 I Total Type Equipment Useful Life 5 yrs Category Unassigned Priority nla Contact Public Works Director Department Sanitary Sewer 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 I 2008 2009 2010 Total 6,000 6,000 Funding Sources Sanitary Sewer Fund 2006 6,000 6,000 2007 Total I I 1--------.-.---...----....--.-------.--.-....----.----.-.-----.-..-------.----.----..----- \ project# 8S-07-01 I Project Name Lift Station 12 Rehabilitation- L._. ...._........._.._.._________. .-..--..- --.. ..----.--.----.---.-.--.---.-.-..--..-....-.... . ........--...-.... -.....-.--.-----..... - .. ......-....-..--.-.......- Fund# 611 I I I Description l Total Cost $110,000 IThis project involves reconstru:tion of the wet well and control panels. I Justification r Type lmprovement Useful Life Unassigned Category Sanitary Sewer Priority nla Contact Engineer Depllrtment Sanitary Sewer -.J I \ I Expenditures 2006 PlanninglDesign/Survey Construction/Inspection Contingencies 2007 19,000 2008 2009 I 19,000 81,000 10,000 91,000 Total 2010 Total 19,000 81,000 10,000 110,000 I . Funding Sources 2006 . Sanitary Sewer Fund 2007 19,000 19,000 2008 91,000 91,000 Total 2009 2010. Total 110,000 110,000 I I I I I MOllday September 12,2005 81 82 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK D Z ::> u. I- Z w ~ w ~ < Z < ~ a. w I- < ~ ~ a. o ~ - . 1-1 C -1: +- "0 3: (\) tI) -1: (\) tI) t.. - (\) >- b+- 3 U ~ (\) (\)-1: (\) +- t..'+- U 0 cJ t.. (\) ..cc_ cJ t.. CJ -583 2+-U ~g~ (\) ..c e;, ..c+-+- +- ::::J u C ~ t.. ..c (\) +- +--1: V) 3:+-CJ tI) .;: "0 (\) ,(\) _c..c -0 .2 ~ o +- (\) o t.. +- 3: 0 0 (\) c. 3 t.. 01 o C ~ ..c '2 (\) \I) .- (\) cJ t.. 6EU >-~'+- +- '+- ._ (\) ::::J U-1:'iii (\) I- >- -1: t.. +--0 ,+-CJ+- o 3 ~ >- U t.. :t:~~ t..,--, .2, +- ~ o u- E .~ ct (\) t; (\) -1: .- -1: I-CJ+- - - CJ 3 "0 U (\) ~ -1: (\) (\) V) 01-1: t.. cJ +- ~c-o ~ ~ ~ cJ 0 cJ +- c (\) _ .2"' b::>tI) c <..!) (\) .2"' ~ ~ V)'--'o (\)-..c -0 V) '--'-0 o :t: 0 +- c 0 +-::>3: ~ - (\) _Ot.. (\) 1:: 0 >-(\)..c o E \I) Ec'+- t.. 0 C(\)>- '- > +- -a 0 .- 0- <..!) U 'u (\) (\) ._ - ..c ~:QI- tI) E5>- ..c o...:t: u V) U g ~ (\) , (\) -1: ~ -1: +- .- ..... '+- t.. 0 o~'+- ...c: _ +- V) 0 ::::J+--1: cJ u (\) >-'~ ..D t.. +- s:: ~ .~ 0 ::::J -0 t.. +- t.. (\) cJ 0 +- ti +- 0 u 3: t.. .- E (\) t.. t.. -0 +- 0 C .~ +- ::>-0 V) - - V) ::> <..!) ~ (\) -1: +- V) c:J o ~ 3 u co a.. ~ (\) ..c +- -0 c o O,+- -0 0 (\) >- a:t: fr~ g t.....c:.> O-+-U ~ >-~ -1:..D(\) -o"O..c o (\) +- o > >- 3: ~ ..D (\) 0...-0 50...(\) ..c c:J > \I) ~ ~ 63:8: >-bO +- ..c s:: .- +- (\) U (\) (\) a ..D -1:-tI) +- a.. 0 +- -1: C c ~.s! (\) 0... 01(\) c:J-1: al- ~o o o N t.. o (\) >- (\) -1: +- s:: (\) +- o -0 s:: o E (\) .::: +- .s! ~ V) +- .- c:J 013: ~ E c:J t.. -1: 0 +-t) 3: (\) (\) > u .- c~-o .9 (\) 0 --1:0 0... (\) ;: E t.. (\) o C. t.. U E 0 s:: o..c HU\I) - - o +-uo -au..2u u .~ x ..2 o 0 .- 0 (\)t..'+-+- >a..0V) oc+--o tI) l\) t.. C (\) ," 0 :J +- t.. ~ (\) '+- U o C >- (\) .~ +- 0 t.. V) 0 (\) (\) (\) t.. C -0 c....c c.. (\).- +- .8<..!)8l\)~ tI) ~ 0, b c.. o +- 0 U 0 -1: (V).- 0 tI) 6*-g 0, l\)ct..-oLO ~Ol\)o* V)+:..D+--o uE-o(\) +- ::::J :J (\) (\) s:: t.. U N U (\) ti C .- x E c l\) 5 (\) (\)01 Ou 0 -1: +- +- +- 0 gt..-o::::Jc Oo(\)cJ-o E '+- +- V) .- O1u 0-0 t.. c ~ 3: +- (\) .- l\) U +- -0 t.. (\) o C tI) (\) ....., 3: :J 0 (\) 0 E '+- -1: c t.. t.. (\) ._ 'm 0... o t.. U C ..c +-::::JcWU V) o-::::J >-0 (\) U 0 +- (\) ..c 0 U '- +- +- 0 >-u cJ ,+-+-+-(\)..c o-uo...c:+- >- C (\) I- g' c 0 ..c '- o '+- -0 E ~ ,~.::; '+- :J t; :J 0 o~o~a tI) c.. .- , ::::J (\) tI) (\) V) U 01 t.. 01 +- 000 0 U '+- C (\) s:: (\) (\) 'ij >-'ij '(l ..c t.. s:: t.. t.. I- -0 H -0 c.. - - - - - - - - - - M co - - 84 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capital Improvement Program City of Shorewood, Minnesota PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT 2006 thru 2010 Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Stormwater Management Gideon Glen improvements(City Costs) STM.Q4.01 0 70,000 70,000 Glen Road Drainage STM-04.02 0 25,000 25,000 Mise Stormwater Projects STM-04-05 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 Stormwater Management Total 125,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 GRAND TOTAL 125,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 MOllday September /2.2005 I -.."...----------...,,-.-----.------.-...-....--.--....-.-.....--.......-----..............-.-...-......----------.--........-..-.....--.- Project #: STM-04-01 ProjectName Gideon Glen Improvements(City Costs) Fund #: 631 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Stormwater Management Priority nla Contact Engineer I .._..~____"__H.~-.-_---_.---------_..._-------------.-_.._..~_._. ..HH...,.___~_...._._.H...__._....._.__~ Description Total Cost $75,000 Department Stormwater Management The Gideon Glen project involves enhancement of an existing wetland, potential construction of storm water management facilities and creating a public education program to study water quality and runoff characteristics. The City of Shorewood has key individuals seeking additional financial support for the project. Funding will be a combined effort from such organizations as Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County Department of Transportation, the Metropolitan LCouncil and the City of Shorewood. C ustification Prior Expenditures r 5,000 I Construction/Inspection Total I I I 2006 70,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 70,000 I Total 70,000 70,000 I Prior 5,000 I Total Funding Sources Met Council Grant Money Total 2006 70,000 70,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 70,000 70,000 I I [;;;~~~:;;~~~:__=_n~~==::_-_-=::__. _] Fund #: 631 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned I Category Stormwater Management Priority nla Contact Engineer Description Total Cost $25,000 Department Stormwater Management Involves installation of tile lines, catch basin structure and cross culvert across Glen Road. In addition. a swale will be constructed to the north. I I \ Justification I I Expenditures Planning/Design/Survey Construction/Inspection 2006 5,000 20,000 25,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,000 20,000 25,000 Total I Funding Sources Stormwater Management Fund Total '2006 25,000 25,000 2007 2008 '2009. 2010 Total . 25,000 25,000 I I I I I Monday September 12. 2005 85 Total Cost $150,000 Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Stormwater Management Priority nla Contact Engineer Department Stormwater Management I ..-.. ---------.--.-. --.----..------.---....---...--.-.......-----.-...---.--...-..--------.-...-..----.-......J-.- Project It STM-04-0S Project Name Mise Stormwater Projects .-.....---. . ' ..,'_.__._,-_.._..._.._---~,._,._----,._-_._--~.._..,..,.---------- FundI#: 631 I Description Specific projects to be determined. \ Justitication Expenditures Construction/Inspection I I 2006 30,000 30,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 I 2006 30,000 30,000 Total Funding Sources Stormwater Management Fund I Total I I I I I I I I I I I I l\-[ollday September 12. 2005 86 I ~ z '<( -1 Q) l- lL W -1 ~ -1 '<( Z o ~ z w I- Z H W c.!) '<( 0- V) H I I- ..... 00 ------------------- . CITY OF SHOREWOOD \ , 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM . TO: . Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers lr"aig-Dawson. City Administratorcb /l . Bonnie Burton, Finance Director/Treasurer~ FROM: DATE: September 1, 2005 SUBJECT: 2006 Proposed General Fund Operating Budget . INTRODUCTION We pleased to present the 2006 Proposed General Fund Operating Budget for your review and approval. The proposed budget and levy for Pay2006 must be certified to Hennepin County by September 15, 2005. . This budget is the result of Council and staff work-sessions in July 18,2005 and August 22, 2005, with direction from Council to be as responsible and as "lean" as possible in developing the 2006 budget. The general approach in preparing the proposed budget has been to continue increasing the transfers to capital funds, to continue addressing matters that have been deferred, and to make additions that will enhance productivity and effectiveness. 2006 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS . . Levy Limits . For the second year in a row, the Legislature did not limit the property tax revenue that cities may levy for. This provides the Council with another opportunity to address matters that have been deferred. If past actions of the Legislature are a guide, if levy limits were to be reinstated, the base for the limited levy will be the current-year levy. n f..~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER # 98 r 2006 Proposed General Fund Operating Budget Page 2 . . Market Value Homestead Credit The MVHC, scheduled to return in 2005, was again retained by the State for its own budget fixes in the State's fiscal 2006-07 biennium (falling in the cities' calendar years 2005 and 2006). The City's scheduled MVHC revenue scheduled was approximately $73,000. . Tax Base TheCity received preliminary information from Hennepin County indicating that the City's tax base will increase 13.25'0 for Pay2006 taxes. . Transfers to Capital Improvernent Funds With the severe levy limits in place for 2004, the Council focused resources on . delivering on-going services and thus reduced capital improvement funds transfers. The proposed 2006 budget restores transfers to the Improvement Funds at levels similar to 2003: 2006 2005 2004 2003 . Equipment Replacement 175,000 116,000 50,000 70,800 Street Reconstruction 345,000 311,000 183,500 200,000 Park Capital Improvement 10,000 10,000 10,000 185,000 Trail Capital Improvement 0 0 0 28,700 Public Facilities 50,000 50,000 50,000 89,600 Land & Open Space 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 Stormwater Management 25.000 7.000 25 .000 35.000 . $610,000 $499,000 $323,500 $609,100 . Public Safety Police and fire services are major components of the budget, and total approximately $1.5 million in 2006. For police, the City Council has approved the level of funding for 2006 recommended by the SLMPD Coordinating Committee: $715,806 (or 46.0% of the $1,556,100 needed in municipal payments). There are several proposals currently under consideration for alternate funding or services for SLMPD in 2006. Accordingly, There is $754,708 available in the 2006 budget. The City's obligation toward the SLMPD building lease is an additional $254,593. The budget for the Excelsior Fire District has been approved by the requisite majority of cities, and Shorewood's resulting contribution will be $538,278, or $289,075 for operations, and $249,203 for facilities. Estimates for services provided by the Mound Fire Department are $26,421, which is . $17,891 for operations, and $8,530 for facilities. , . . . . . 2006 Proposed General Fund Operating Budget Page 3 . Public Works/Engineering Council approved a major change in the Public Works department, with the authorization of a separate full-time City Engineer position. Earlier this year a candidate accepted an employment offer but soon after withdrew it. We are currently accepting applications for the position, and hope to have someone on board for the last quarter of 2005. We expect that the Council's priority to move ahead on the City's infrastructure planning will be better addressed, along with the work needed to fulfill the.increasing number and scope of state and federal reporting mandates. . Municipal Facilities The addition of an equipment/mechanic's bay at the Public Works Building wouldstart late in 2006 and be completed in 2007. Funding for the planning and design ($60,000) is included in the 2006 proposed budget, with funding for the balance of the $400,000 project to be included with a bond sale in 2007. Planning continues for improvements to City Hall during 2006, and a sale of bonds for construction would be planned for 2007. . Salaries and Insurance The proposed budget provides for 2.0% economic adjustments on January 1 and July 1. Increases for public works maintenance employees are yet to be set in the labor agreement with AFSCME that will start in 2006. Total insurance premiums have been estimated to increase 10 percent. Additional education reimbursement has also been programmed. . Improvements to Document Retrieval System Council approved the acquisition of a document retrieval system in 2005. The goal is for all of the City's documents to be stored in an archival-approved manner in digital form, and placed on a database system, and with public Web access (subject to certain levels of security). The structure of the system and scanning of documents has begun. Improvements proposed for 2006 include Document Imaging Weblink software for a total of $8,800. . Other Technology Improvements The Finance accounting software, purchased in 1998-1999, is no longer being supported by the manufacturer and needs to be upgraded. After reviewing several packages, it appears that "Incode" by Tyler Technologies offers the best value. Accordingly, $45,000 has been proposed for financial software replacement. -1<.1'1 :r -+ (\l a. ~-h 6 ~. N-+ O:r O(\l O'::S -+ 0 o (\l x 4 ro-h ~-< o :} ::s -. Q.Ul 0"'0"' c c 0.0. lOlO (\l (\l -+-+ o 0 0...::S o 0... ~(\l o'~ ::s 0 :E Ul -. , -(\l 0"' -0 (\l C Ul , o (\l :r 0... (\l 0"' Q.(\l =--h (\l 0 0.' -h(\l o -+ , :r (\l ~<.1'1 o (\l (\l-a 3 -+ O"'(\l (\l 3 , 0"' N(\l 0' 0- ~U1 0. (\l o 0. 5' ~ . 0"<.1'1 ::s , -+ 0. 0 0 =-g -h <.1'IUl-h (\l (\l , ::t: 0. (\l -. (i) 0 ::s (\l 0 lO ::s 3 -I (\l 3 , , (\l C 0 ::s -+-0. :rI1Ul I C H::s-+ TQ.g ofQ;)-+ xc -+ oo...:r -+ lO (\l -, (\l roo. 0-+" ::s -. "g..;t cQ.~ 0"'-+0 ;::;:. :r C " (\l ::s I " !2. (\l 6 0 ~-a-a :;. g ~ lO (\l 0 C7Q.< o N (\l -+0-+ (\lo:r Ul" U1 (\l ,,~ , -+ o 0 -a 0 (\l :r , (\l ..;to. , of~ x 2- ,c (\l ::t ~ g ~ Ul ~ o " (\l <.1'1 o (\l ::t::t: 0"' -. _ ::s (\llO :;. :} N(\l ON 00 ~O - 0' .,., m n o ~ ~ m Z C1 m C1 ~ n ;:t o z . <.1'Ig~~ -I :r 0. 0 -. :r 0<0 (\l ~ ~ 0.: ~. N :E ::s (\l ::t 0 o 0 Ul (\l 0 ofiolAO' 0. -. 0" 9..~::s, -aUlQ.o 0"0 0."0 Ul 0 -. 0 =+::s~~ o' & ~ 0... ? (i" o' (i) :E "0 ::s ~ :r.P:r~ (\l ::s 0 0 -+::s- o 0 ~ 11 g ..... -+ C -+ '-I :r::s -. e.. (\l 0. ::SOn C ::s -. 0 -. 0 -+ t5(\l-<-g -+-+~' o:ro~ (\l C -, -a ~ ::s ::s 6 -. !2. lO <-+:-Q;) -. -< C 0. Ul- <.1'1 0. (\l Ul -+ lO -0 (\l 0 (\l C , -h -+ 9.. ~, -h 0 -. 0 0"' ::s ..;t(\l~o... 0... -. - Ul (\l (\l (\l (\l_<< , -. (\l -< < < Ul -, (\l :E O'-+(\l (\l -< :r , Ul ::s (\l (\l -+(\l"o- o (\l , '-I -+ 0. 0 ' :rUl-a.g (\l ~ 0 0 , 5' Ul , (\l -h (\l (\l Ul,Q.Q. -, 0 NO 0.(1)00 ~-+oo -+20'0 Ul 0 0"'6.. o c-+ C -. -h Q.::S ~lOlO ::s (\l -+ (\l -+ 0 (\l -+ 0. :r Ul (\l . n o Z n E (n H o Z O"'C7O"'<.1'I::s-f C(\lC(\lo:r 0. 0 0..."0 (\l lO (\l lO -+ C (\l :3 (\l (\l 0.-+ -+O"'it3~2 o (\l 0"' roo. -+ 5. ' :;. ~ ~~ =r _ ~U1 :} _..;t :;' ~ 0 (\l ~U1 ~ ~ -<::S-h 00 O"'Q.oNcX (\l -. - 0 ::s 0 -h-h::700::t o::s :r~=0 ,(\lo-ho::s (\l (\l c:: _,"0 "0 -< 0... _. ::s "0 , (\l (\l ::s 0 6 0 oQ.lO-<O 'o.gj~e..~ ~(\l(\l~OUl 0. 0 !2. 0 -h ~. , ~e..60 0"' -g ::t ci' .ti' (\l .....0-< , '-I::S No - o' 0 0 :E N -h0 NifoO':} oo=,,(\l 0'~"'1-+ U1 ::s =+ 0 "lO-<-g3 o Ul Ul (\l ::s 0 0"' (\l -+ Q.::s&o...g.. &. :} 'g of (\l -8(\litxg -+"0 ~ ,0... o' 6 :;. ~ "0 ::s"O 0-<, o g C -+ g 5. (\l 9:- 0 (\l 0...::s0"'0... 2 0"' lO (\l fi "'1 C (\l 0 (\l -+o...~(\lUl =h lO (\l "'1 0' ~ "'1 ::t ::s o 0 ~ ~~ ::t ::s -. (\l 0 o 0... ~ 0... 0 ::s -+ ::s (\l oogop -hXQ. Ul -+ - 0-+ :r (\l C (\t-< (\l ~ ::t , (\l -h ~~o -, 0 ..;t :r ' 6::S o' - ::s -f :r iii' . -f .,., C -f J: I H Z I -f ~ X ~ ;:t o z "0 11 11 " "'1 , C 0 <' (\l ::s .., o (\l o...:;IIt"' -+3(1)" (\l 00.., -h::S'0 C ,,(\l \0 5.. ~ ::s a :;. ^ !2.. 3 lO' C:3 o Q f} :;' , -+ 0.\0 0. -< -+ o -h 0 6C"O -+ ::s , -. 0. 0 o :;. < ~ lO 0.: -h 0 (\l o g 0 '--h -+0.0 :rO"'c (\l (\l , ? , -0 (\l (\l 0.' C -h o 0 (\l , 0...3 o o ::s , 0 3 (\l o (I) , (\l (\l ~. o (\l o Ul ::s 0 o -h (\l Ul , C it:3 o 3 -h(\l -h, (\l 0 , 0 (\l ::s 0.0 =h~ -+-+ :rUl (\l 5' , (\l iii' . " o lO (\l ~ N o o Cl' " , o "0 o Ul (\l 0. (i) (\l ::s (\l , 9.. 11 C ::s 0. o "0 (\l "'1 o -+ :;. lO Q;) C 0... lO (\l -+ . .... . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION SETTING THE 2006 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND APPROVING THE PROPOSED 2005 PROPERTY TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2006 WHEREAS, the City staff has presented to the City Council the proposed 2006 General Fund Budget and the 2005 property tax levy collectible in 1006; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has met to review the proposed budget and property tax levy; and, WHEREAS, the City Council must approve and certify its proposed 2006 budget and preliminary property tax levy for the current year, collectible in 2006, to the County Auditor by . September 15 of each year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that: 1. The 2006 Proposed General Fund budget is hereby set at $4,797,495. . 2. The following sums be levied for the current year, collectible in 2006, upon taxable property in the City of Shorewood, for the following purposes: General Fund Levy Special Levy $3,735,592 511.803 Total 2004 Levy: $4.247.395 . 3. That the City Clerk-Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: . Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION SETTING TRUTH-IN-TAXATION PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED 2006 BUDGETS AND THE 2005 PROPERTY TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2006 WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law requires local governments to hold public hearings on their proposed budgets and property tax levies, and to publish notice of said public hearing to achieve truth in taxation, and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Revenue has issued guidelines for local governments to follow in implementing truth in taxation requirements, and, WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to comply with such guidelines, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that a public hearing on the proposed 2006 Municipal Budgets and the property tax levy for 2005, collectible in 2006, be held on Monday, December 5, 2005, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, and a continuation hearing, if necessary be held on Monday, December 12, 2005, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, at the City Hall, and that notice of such public hearing shall be published in accordance with Minnesota State Law and guidelines set forth by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of September, 2005. Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us ,; . ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 2006 PROPOSED ANNUAL GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET 12 September 2005 ft tJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER # 96 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 2006 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE . Preparation Calendar for 2006 Budget 1 Summary of Proposed 2006 General Fund Budget 2-3 Ge.ne.ral Fund Departmental Budgets 41110 - Mayor and Council 4-5 41300 - Administration 6-7 41400 - City Clerk 8-9 41450 - Elections 10-11 41500 - Finance 12-13 41600 - Professional Services 14-15 41910 - Planning and Zoning 16-17 41940 - Municipal Building - City Hall 18-19 42100 - Police 20-21 42200 - Fire Protection 22-23 42400 - Protective Inspection 24-25 42700 - Animal Control 26-27 43010 - City Engineer 28-29 43050 - Public Works Service 30-31 43100 - Streets and Roadways 32-33 43125 - Snow and Ice Removal 34-35 43160 - Traffic Control/Street Lighting 36-37 43200 - Sanitation/Waste Removal/Weeds 38-39 43250 - Tree Maintenance 40-41 45200 - Parks and Recreation 42-43 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Year 2006 Budget Schedule Date DescriDtion 07/15/05 Budget worksheets distributed to staff and department heads. 07/18/05 Budget discussion and work-session (Council and Staff) 07/23/05 Completed budget worksheets due from staff. 08/22/05 General Fund Operating Budget work session (Council and Staff) 09/12/05 Regular Council meeting. Council adopts 2006 proposed budget and levy. 09/15/05 Proposed budget and levy must be adopted and certified to County Auditor by this date. State form Payable 2006 PT Form 280 also to be submitted. 10/24/05 Enterprise fund budget work-session (Council and staff) 11/20-11/24 Counties to mail Notice of Proposed Property Tax by this date. 11/24/05 Budget hearing advertisement published in the official newspaper. 12/05/05 City initial budget truth-in-taxation hearing. 12/12/05 If required, the continuation budget truth-in-taxation hearing to be held on this date. 12/12/05 Regular Council meeting. Final 2006 budgets and levy to be adopted. 12/30/05 Final levy and budgets must be certified to the County Auditor by this date. State forms Payable 2006 Property Tax Levy Report and PT Form TNT2006 also due. 1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 2006 PROPOSED BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted $$ 'Y. 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Change Change Revenues and Other Sources Property Taxes 3,071,853 3,344,442 3,830,656 1,326,100 4,201,389 4,247,395 416,739 10.88% Licenses and Permits 334,424 310,055 196,100 139,850 197,100 197,100 1,000 0.51% Intergovernmental 65,782 73,065 65,000 59,695 65,000 65,000 0 0.00% Fines and Forfeitures 88,949 81,841 62,000 34,075 70,000 70,000 8,000 12.90% Charges for Service 48,689 44,169 42,265 33,056 43,000 43,000 735 1.74% Miscellaneous Revenue 89,343 103,676 125,000 121,615 125,000 125,000 0 0.1.10% Total Revenues 3,699,040 3,957,248 4,321,021 1,714,391 4,701,489 4,747,495 0 426,474 9.87% Expenditures General Government Mayor and Council 93,693 60,373 113,493 28,025 112,793 112,793 (700) -0.62% Administration 104,539 110,659 144,444 66,296 148,209 148,209 3,765 2.61% General Government 173,689 184,167 233,235 133,853 227,963 220,743 (12,492) .5.36% Elections 6,006 13,817 600 831 37,618 45,323 44,723 7453.83% Finance 127,064 148,776 194,684 92,857 241,172 241,172 46,488 23.88% Professional Services 169,394 142,061 192,000 109,294 1BO,000 180,000 (12,000) -6.25% Planning and Zoning 146,953 158,202 161 ,853 83,125 183,556 183,556 21,703 13.41% Municipal Building 128,146 144,522 170,015 70,444 183,000 183,000 12,985 7.64% Total General Government 949,484 962,577 1,210,324 584,725 1,314,311 1,314,796 0 104,472 8.63% Public Safety Police 609,992 937,001 992,550 494,685 992,456 1 ,038,538 45,988 4.63% Fire Protection 293,029 481,642 493,710 252,074 564,699 564,699 70,989 14.38% Protective Inspection 86,958 101,306 111,303 52,231 115,042 115,042 3,739 3.36% Animal Control 19,900 20,971 24,000 13,005 26,000 26,000 2,000 8.33% Total Public Safety 1,009,879 1,540,920 1,621,563 811,995 1,698,197 1,744,279 0 76,634 4.73% Public Works City Engineer 101,582 117,887 140,941 52,690 157,597 157,597 16,656 11.82% Public Works Services 225,940 249,445 379,195 139,751 408,326 422,949 43,754 11.54% Streets and Roadways 104,045 126,456 174,000 51,744 175,934 175,934 1,934 1.11% Snow and Ice Removal 40,013 36,700 64,817 25,439 69,792 69,792 4,975 7.68% Traffic Control/Street Lights 34,478 33,651 40,000 16,873 42,400 42,400 2,400 6.00% Sanitation/Waste Removal 3,993 2,876 5,133 3,585 5,448 5,448 315 6.14% Tree Maintenance 20,715 31,619 26,546 15,464 48,005 32,821 6,275 23.64% Total Public Works 530,766 598,634 830,632 305,566 907,502 906,941 0 76,309 9.19% Culture and Recreation Parks and Recreation 451,793 166,864 209,502 84,668 221,479 221,479 11,977 5.72% Total Culture and Recreation 451,793 166,864 209,502 84,668 221,479 221,479 0 11,977 5.72% Total Expenditures 2,941.922 3,268,995 3,872,021 1,786,954 4,141,489 4,187,495 0 315,474 8.15% Total Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 757,118 688,253 449,000 (72,563) 560,000 560,000 0 111,000 2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD GENERAL FUND REVENUE. AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 2006 PROPOSED BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted $$ 'Y. 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Change Change Fund Transfers In Liquor Fund 30,000 30,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Street Reconstr Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Trail Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Sewer Fund 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% . Water Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Transfers In 55,000 30,000 SO ,000 0 SO,OOO so ,000 0 0 0.00% Fund Transfers Out Equip Replacemt Fund (PW) 70,800 50.000 116,000 175,000 175,000 59,000 50.86% Street Reconstr Fund 200,000 183,500 311,000 345,000 345,000 34,000 10.93% Park Capital Imp Fund 185,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0,00% Trail Capital Imprvment Fnd 28,700 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Public Facilities Fund 89,600 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Land & Open Space Fund 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0,00% Stormwater Mgmt Fund 35,000 25,000 7,000 25,000 25,000 18,000 257.14% Total Fund Transfers Out 609,100 323,500 499,000 0 610,000 610,000 0 111,000 22.24% Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over Expenditures and Other Uses 203,018 394,753 0 (72,563) 0 0 0 0 (0) Amounts to be Provided from General Fund Balance 0 0 72,563 0 0 0 0 General Fund Balance January 1 2,157,978 2,546,472 2,941,223 2,941,223 2,941,223 2,941,223 2,941,223 General Fund Balance December 31 2,546,472 2,941,223 2,941,223 2,868,660 2,941,223 2,941,223 2,941,223 3 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' The Mayor and City Council set policy for the City and provide general direction to the Administrator in policy implementation. The department budget supports council development, information efforts and special City associations and proQrams. DEPARTMENT: Mayor and Council DEPT NO: 41110 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' The City Council meets twice montly and in periodic special worksessions to consider and adopt legislative and administrtive policies that pertain to the services provided to residents. The City Council also sits as the Board of Review for property valuations and as the Board of the Shorewood Economic Development Authority. OBLJECTIVES: . Establish annual work program of goals and priorities for the City . Meet at least annually with advisory commissions. - Strategic planning and direction HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Staffing: City Council Salaries Supplies/Materials: Awards and misc. supplies Support Services: Conferences and Seminars Appreciation Function for City Volunteers/Staff Special Brochures Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Assn of Metro Municipalities League of MN Cities Excelsior Chamber of Commerce July 4th Celebration Charges, Fees & Other: Council Contingency 4 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Mayor and Council DEPT 4111 0 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 13,564 13,564 13,733 16,793 8,397 16,793 16,793 0 Supplies/Materials 544 526 1,183 1,200 613 1,000 1,000 0 Support Services 77,282 46,779 45,457 65,500 19,016 55,000 55,000 0 Charges, Fees & Other 2,303 18 0 30,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 93.693 60,887 60.373 113,493 28,025 112.793 112.793 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' Seminars, Conferences & Schools Attended 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Newsletters Published 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 No. of Council Mtgs. 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 No. of Workshops/Special 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Agenda Items 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Ordinances & Resolutions Adopted 113 122 130 130 130 130 130 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 93,693 60,887 60,373 113,493 28,025 112,793 112,793 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 93,693 60,887 60,373 113,493 28,025 112,793 112,793 0 STAFFING' Part time: Mayor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Council members 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' To implement policy established by the City Council; offer staff support to the City Council in its policy making role; and manage day-to-day operations of the City in a manner consistent with established City values to effectively and efficiently meet set qoals & objectives. DEPARTMENT: Administration DEPT NO: 41300 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' The City Administrator directs City departmental operations to ensure compliance with policies established by the City Council and with state and federal laws. The department supports the City Council by managing Council agendas, directing the flow of information and requests for action to the Council. OBJECTIVES' - Take a leadership role in intergovernmental cooperative efforts in the Lake Minnetonka area - Participate actively in joint powers organizations - Participate actively in legislative and policy activities of municipal associations - Actively monitor legislation and communicate with legislators HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Includes step increases Supplies/Materials: Miscellaneous books & supplies Support Services: Labor Relations Associates Contract Conference, mileage, meetings & seminars Memberships to ICMA, MCMA, MAMA 6 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Administration DEPT 41300 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2002 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 98,716 103,766 108,416 129,344 58,589 136.009 136,009 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 400 0 400 400 0 Support Services 5,823 6,587 2,242 12,700 6,055 11,800 11,800 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 2,000 1,652 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 104,539 110,353 110,659 144.444 66.296 148,209 148.209 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' Council MtgslWork Sessions 48 48 48 Council Agenda Items 500 500 500 Public Safety Board Meetings 20 20 20 Public Safety Staff Meetings 14 14 14 Staff Meetings 52 52 52 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 104,539 110,353 110,659 66,296 148,209 148,209 0 - Program Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Levy Dollars 104,539 110,353 110,659 66,296 148,209 148,209 0 STAFFING: Full Time: Admistrator/Clk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Exec Sec/Dep Clk .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 7 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Provide staff support for the City Council including preparation of agendas and meeting packets. Responsible for City Clerk functions including records retention, notices and licenses. DEPARTMENT: General Government/City Clerk DEPT NO: 41400 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: This department provides for general reception and clerical duties in the City offices, as well as the recording secretary for City Council meetings. The Deputy Clerk is the official recordkeeper of minutes, contracts, and permanent records, and supervises all staff in this area. This department is responsible for all licensing functions. It also oversees implementation of the City communication tools. OBJECTIVES: . Continue to improve web site, to include information for residents and tools for better communication with City Hall - Produce monthly City newsletter to include community articles & photos, council & commission articles, & project updates - Provide information for general requests from residents and contractors - Prepare orientation package for new council members, commission members and staff - Assist in preparation of Employee Handbook HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Includes step increases for full time employees, part-time communications tech part-time, temporary, general office support part-time Web developer Supplies/Materials: Newlsetter and General Office Supplies Newsletter and General Postage Software upgrades/Misc. Publications Support Services: Travel, Conferences and Education Publication of legal notices for all General Fund Depts Council Recording Secretary Newsletter Mail Service City Code Book UpdateslWeb Hosting Documenet Destruction Service Membership Dues Capital Outlay: Duplicator/Printer for Newsletter Office Furniture and Fixtures 8 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: General Government/City Clerk DEPT 41400 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 128,277 126,512 143,456 141,875 69,288 145,948 137,978 0 Supplies/Materials 17 ,404 24,436 22,697 27,350 13,272 30,900 30,900 0 Support Services 25,044 20,741 13,548 23,710 7,675 28,315 29,065 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 2,964 3,456 4,467 40,300 43,619 22,800 22,800 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 173.689 175,145 184.167 233.235 133.853 227.963 220.743 "~,:,,~ SERVICE INDICATORS' No. of Elections held 0 0 0 2 0 0 No. of Ordinances 10 10 10 10 0 0 No. of Resolutions 120 120 120 120 0 0 Dog licenses issued 450 450 450 400 0 0 Other licenses issued 30 30 30 60 0 0 Council Agendas 48 48 48 48 0 0 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 173,689 175,145 184,167 233,235 133,853 227,963 220,743 0 . Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 173,689 175,145 184,167 233,235 133,853 227,963 220,743 0 STAFFING' Full time: Exec Sec/Dep Clk .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .60 Parks Secretary .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 Secretary/Receptionist 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Accounting Clerk I 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Part time: Communications Tech. 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.57 Web site Maint. (Plan.Asst) 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Temporary Receptionist 9 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Responsible for Election functions. DEPARTMENT: Elections DEPT NO: 41410 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' This department provides for the preparation for and supervision of State/Federal Primary City General and Special elections by the Deputy City Clerk. OBJECTIVES: - Increase youth awareness of local govemment issues through active involvement with school officials and instructors through programs such as student election judges and kids voting - Implement HA V A requirements HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: .10 Exec Sec/Deputy Clerk Election Judges Supplies/Materials: Misc. Office Supplies Postage Equpment Maintenance General Supplies Support Services: Legal Notices Travel - Mileage Reimb. Printing (ballots, envelopes) Capital Outlay: HAVA required Election Equipment Voting Booths (6) Directional Signs 10 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Elections DEPT 41410 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June ~equested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 0 0 9,122 0 0 12,918 20,623 0 Supplies/Materials 3.216 0 2,529 600 831 3,400 3,400 0 Support Services 2,790 0 1,898 0 0 2,200 2.200 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 268 0 0 19,100 19,100 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 6,006 0 13,817 600 831 37.618 45,323 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No. of Elections held 2 0 0 2 2 0 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 6.006 0 13,817 600 831 37,618 45,323 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 6,006 0 13,817 600 831 37,618 45,323 0 STAFFING: Full time: Exec Sec/Dep Clk 0,20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 Part time: Election Judges 35 35 40 40 11 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' To administer financial policies of the City; perform accounting functions for all fund types; invest available funds in accordance with State Statutes; oversee City insurance policies; and provide for timely reporting of financial matters to City Council staff and the public. DEPARTMENT: Finance DEPT NO: 41500 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' Finance is responsible for processing all financial transactions of the City in accordance with Federal, State and Local laws, and in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Transactions include accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, investments, utility billing, special assessments, risk management, personnel benefits and financial reporting. The Finance Director is responsible for the preparation and administration of the City budget. OB,JECTIVES' - Prepare annual budget document - Prepare CAFR for submittal to GFOA Certificate of Achievement Program - Review debt issues and make recommendations on debt structure - Review and update financial policies and procedures - Coordinate the transition to GASB 34 financial reporting HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Staffing: Includes step increases Supplies/Materials: Computer checks & budget supplies Finance software support and maintenance Miscellaneous supplies Support Services: Conferences, Mileage, Meetings, Education & Seminars Publication of Financial Statements & Budgets Memberships to GFOA & MGFOA Subscription to GFOA periodicals Submittal fee - GFOA Certificate of Excellence Program Submittal fee - GFOA Distinguished Budget Award Program Bank & Broker service charges Capital Outlay: 12 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Finance DEPT 41500 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 ._?QQa Staffing 117,031 137,883 136,487 163,684 82,895 174,972 174,972 0 Supplies/Materials 1,090 5,176 4,722 18,000 5,415 6,700 6,700 0 Support Services 7,888 5,359 7,035 10,500 3,961 12,000 12,000 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 1,055 3,098 533 2,500 586 47,500 47,500 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 127.064 151.517 148.776 194,684 92.857 241.172 241 .172 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' No. Monthly Statements 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 No. Accounts Payable Checks Issued 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Utility Bills Sent 11,000 11,000 11,000 11 ,000 11,500 11,500 11 ,500 No. of Payroll Checks Issued 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,250 1,250 1,250 No. of Sp. Assess. Rolls Maintained 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 127,064 148,776 194,684 92,857 241,172 241,172 0 = Levy Dollars 127,064 148,776 194,684 92,857 241,172 241,172 0 STAFFING: Full time: Finance Dir 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr Acctg Clerk .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .85 .85 .85 Acctg. Clerk .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 13 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Provide contracted professional services to the City including general legal, prosecution, financial audit and property assessment. DEPARTMENT: Professional Services DEPT NO: 41600 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' This department provides for contracted legal, assessing and auditing services for the City. Legal services include general counsel to the City Council, litigation and prosecution of criminal misdemeanors. Assessing services provide property valuation information for tax purposes. Audit services provide for the annual financial audit required by Minnesota State Statutes. OB.IECTIVES: - Contain costs on contracted professional services - Attempt to utilize mediation services to avoid litigation HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Supplies/Materials: Supplies for City Assessor Support Services: Includes general legal fees and prosecutions, mediation services, assessing contract, annual audit services. Charges and Fees: 14 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Professional Services DEPT 41600 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD JUNE Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 200? Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Services 169,394 169,144 142,061 192,000 109,294 180,000 180,000 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 169.394 169.144 142,061 192,000 109,294 180.000 180,000 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No. of parcels 3,050 3,050 3,050 3,050 3,050 3,050 No. of litigations 5 5 5 5 5 5 No. of City Funds 22 22 22 22 22 22 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 169,394 169,144 142,061 192,000 109,294 180,000 180,000 0 - Program Revenues Fines 18,100 19,300 19,300 19,300 0 0 = Levy Dollars 151,294 149,844 122,761 172,700 109,294 180,000 180,000 0 Other Dollars STAFFING' 15 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Guide and control the physical development of the community. Coordinate and implement long range city-wide and area planning activities. DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning DEPT NO: 41910 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' This department is responsible for the review of development proposals, preparing and updating the City's Comprehensive Plan, and other long range planning activities. It provides for administration and enforcement of the City's zoning codes, and preparation and upkeep of zoning, subdivision, floodplain and other planning and zoning related ordinances. OBJECTIVES- - Establish an action plan to implement Comprehensive Plan - Complete GIS parcel data base - Update/enhance city maps - Update/enhance procedure handouts HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Staffing: Includes step increases Supplies/Materials: Maintenance contracts for computer & office equipment Miscellaneous supplies Support Services: Recording Secretary for Planning Commission Meetings Air time for cellular phone Conferences, mileage, meetings & seminars Memberships to APA, MN APA, Sensible Land Use Coalition Subscriptions to APA Journal & Zoning News Charges & Fees: Capital Outlay: 16 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning DEPT 41910 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 128,405 141,216 148,955 143,468 75,317 165,751 165,751 0 Supplies/Materials 842 994 916 1,475 552 1,925 1,925 0 Support Services 16,961 10,819 8,332 14,510 4,571 13,580 13,580 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 745 2,076 0 2,400 2,685 2,300 2,300 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 146.953 155,105 158.202 161.853 83.125 183.556 183,556 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' No. of zoning apps. 20 20 20 20 20 No. of zoning cornplnts 20 20 25 25 25 Planning Comm. Meetings 12 12 12 12 12 Planning Comm. Work Sessions 12 12 12 12 12 COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 146,953 155,105 158,202 161,853 83,125 183,556 183,556 0 - Program Revenues Zoning Appl. Fees Bldg. Permit Carryover (from Proto Inspection) = Levy Dollars 146,953 155,105 158,202 161 ,853 83,125 183,556 183,556 0 STAFFING' Full time: Planning Dir .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Planning Asst. .70 .70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Part Time: Clerical 17 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Provide for the physical operation of City Hall: utilities; maintenance of office equipment and the building structure; and provide for the City's general liability, property, auto and workers' compensation insurance. DEPARTMENT: Municipal Bldg - City Hall DEPT NO: 41940 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: The Municipal Building department provides for maintenance of all equipment located in the City Hall, and for janitorial services to furnish a clean environment in which to conduct City business. General Uability, Property and Casualty insurance coverages are also provided under this department. OBJECTIVES: - Identify maintenance needs to avoid major investments in the future - Identify options for maximum utilization of office space to avoid future additions - Maintain existing facilities at current level or better utilizing staff to reduce maintenance costs . Continue to dispose of outdated documentation in storage area - Continue to promote community programs to enhance public facilities, such as "Adopt a Garden." HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Supplies/Materials: Maintenance contracts for copiers, telephones and office equipment Maintenance to city hall building City Hall supplies Support Services: City Hall janitorial, rug services, & pest control Utilities and phone service for City Hall Insurance coverage for all city depts except enterprise funds Rental of postage meter Special Assessments on City owned property Sales and Use Tax Payments Charges & Fees: Capital Outlay: Senior Community Center Payment Transfers: Public Facilities Fund - Office Equipment 18 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Municipal Building - City Hall DEPT 41940 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 7,332 13,197 14,063 15,865 8,187 26,650 26,650 0 Support Services 82,228 98,160 93,444 115,600 24,713 117,800 117,800 0 Charges & Fees 0 37,544 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 38,586 1,938 37,544 38,550 37,544 38,550 38,550 0 Transfers 89,600 35.000 50.000 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 TOTAL 217.746 185.840 195.051 220,015 70.444 233,000 233.000 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 217,746 185,840 195,051 220,015 70,444 233,000 233,000 o - Program Revenues o 0 = Levy Dollars 217,746 185,840 195,051 220,015 70,444 233,000 233,000 o Other Dollars STAFFING: 19 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' To provide a modern, flexible, full-service criminal justice agency which is responsive to community needs. DEPARTMENT: Police DEPT NO: 42100 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' The South Lake Minnetonka Police Department is a cooperative joint venture between the cities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay. Through this venue, the department provides for the protection of the safety and well-being of citizens in the community, the prevention and detection of crime, and the enforcement of all local, state and federal laws in a cost-efficient manner. Costs and staff are allocated to each of the participating cities on a set percentage basis. The pro-rata share of costs and staff time for City of Shorewood is at 46.0% A separate obligation is required to finance the new SLMPD station. The cost is apportioned on an ad valorem basis among four cities. The City of Shorewood's pro-rata share of the 2006 payment is $254,600, which is approximately 58% of the total payment due. OBJECTIVES: HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Supplies/Materials: Upgrade civil defense sirens (two sirens - 2006) Support Services: Police services contract for 2006 Prisoner expense, court officer expense, & booking fees Annual Police Reserve Dinner 20 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Police DEPT 42100 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2906 Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 Support Services 609,193 630,909 671 ,236 722,050 364,983 719,856 758,758 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 152,052 265,600 270,500 129,702 272,600 279,600 0 Transfers 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 609.993 782.961 937.001 992.550 494,685 992.456 1.038,358 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' Initial complaint reports 6,611 6,174 6,174 6,174 Pending Pending Clearance rate - ICR's 100% 100% 100% 100% Part I crimes (serious) 204 189 189 189 Part II crimes (other) 634 717 717 717 Clearance rate (Parts I & 11) 67% 58% 58% 58% Statewide clearance rate 45% 46% 46% 46% Citations issued 6,924 5,591 5,591 5,591 Police vehicles 9 9 9 9 Shorewood demand COST INDICATORS' Expenditures 609,993 782,961 937,001 992,550 494,685 992,456 1,038,358 0 - Program Revenues Fines 75,700 75,700 0 0 = Levy Dollars 551 ,753 782,961 861.301 916,850 494,685 992,456 1 ,038,358 0 STAFFING: Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sergeant 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Investigator * 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Patrol Officer 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Office Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist (part time) ** 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Community Service Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * 1 Juvenile Specialist 21 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: Provide the highest possible quality of fire suppression, prevention and eduction services, and First Responder emergency medical services. DEPARTMENT: Fire Protection DEPT NO: 42200 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' Fire services are contracted by the City through the Excelsior Fire District and the City of Mound. This department provides for the protection of life and property of the citizens of the community through fire prevention and suppression, fire inspection, building inspection, fire code enforcement and emergency medical services. A separate obligation is made toward the financing of new facilities for the Excelsior Fire District. This cost is apportioned on the same allocation for the operating budget. The City of Shorewood's pro-rata share of the 2006 debt service payment is $249,203. OBJECTIVES' HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Support Services: Fire contracts with Mound and Excelsior Fire District 22 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Fire Protection DEPT 42200 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Services 293,029 251,912 235,010 256,418 137,241 307,496 307,496 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 147,008 246,632 237,292 114,834 257,203 257,203 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 293.029 398,920 481,642 493,710 252,074 564.699 564.699 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' Fire calls 125 135 135 125 125 Rescue calls 179 125 125 180 180 Inspection hours 25 25 25 25 Investigation hours 35 35 35 35 Other hours * 400 400 400 400 Cost of emergency response 463,771 475,839 Cost of inspection! investigation 17,871 17,871 17,871 17,871 * includes plan review, paper work, complaint investigation, tank removals, burning permits, etc. COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 293,029 398,920 481,642 493,710 252,074 564,699 564,699 0 - Program Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Levy Dollars 293,029 398,920 481,642 493,710 252,074 564,699 564,699 0 EFD STAFFING: Chief (FIT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Asst. Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dist. Chief 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Captain 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Lieutenants 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fire Marshal (FIT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Training Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Firefighters 37.00 37.00 41.00 41.00 41.00 41.00 41.00 41.00 23 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION' Enforce construction safety and related building codes through plan review and inspections. Enforce animal control ordinances. DEPARTMENT: Protective Inspection DEPT NO: 42400 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY' This department provides for the issuance building and construction permits, review of construction plans and specifications, enforcement of all building codes under the Uniform Building Code, inspection of rental housing units, and inspection of zoning violations. The department also provides for contractual animal control, which includes patrol, detention and disposition of stray domestic animals. OBJECTIVES: - Increase and enhance public information through the development of at least two handouts relative to building codes - Explore joint inspection possibilities with adjoining communities - Enhance environmental inspections HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS' Staffing: Includes step increases Supplies/Materials: Maintenance contracts on computer and office equipment Miscellaneous supplies Support Services: Contractual inspections during vacations, sick leave Conferences, mileage, meetings & seminars Printing of application forms Membership tolCBO Charges & Fees: Remittances to state of permit surcharges collected Capital Outlay: 24 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Protective Inspection DEPT 42400 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 77,595 89,528 95,455 99,783 48,577 103,422 103,422 0 Supplies/Materials 361 89 777 300 137 400 400 0 Support Services 8,715 7,114 5,074 10,820 2,985 10,820 10,820 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 287 2,129 0 400 532 400 400 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 86,958 98,860 101 .306 111 .303 52,231 115.042 115.042 0 SERVICE INDICATORS' No. of permits issued New Homes 10 25 20 20 20 Additions/Other 475 790 600 600 600 Avg inspections/permit New Homes 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 Additions/Other 2-8 2-8 2-8 2-8 2-8 Commercial/Industrial: 1 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 86,958 98,860 101,306 111,303 52,231 115,042 115,042 0 - Program Revenues Building Permits 175,000 175,000 82,898 180,000 180,000 0 State Surcharges 500 500 Rental Housing Licenses 3,500 3,500 = Levy Dollars 86,958 98,860 (77,694) (67,697) (30,667) (64,958) (64,958) 0 STAFFING: Full time: Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Planning Dir .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 Planning Asst .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .20 .20 Secretary/Recept .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .15 .15 25 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: Enforce animal control ordinances. DEPARTMENT: Animal Control DEPT NO: 42700 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: The department provides for contractual animal control, which includes patrol, detention and disposition of stray domestic animals. OBJECTIVES: HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Supplies/Materials: Support Services: Animal control contracts with City of Orono and Claws, Paws & Hooves Charges & Fees: Capital Outlay: 26 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Animal Control DEPT 42700 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 20QQ, Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Services 19,900 19,495 20,971 24,000 13,005 26,000 26,000 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,.-JL TOTAL 19,900 19,495 20.971 24.000 13.005 26.000 26.000 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No. of Animal Complaints 47 50 50 42 50 50 50 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 19,900 19,495 20,971 24,000 13,005 26,000 26,000 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars STAFFING: Full time: 19,900 19,495 20,971 24,000 13,005 26,000 26,000 o 27 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: DEPARTMENT: City Engineer Provide engineering and construction management services for the City. DEPT NO: 43010 DESRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: This department is responsible for general engineering services in the City, as well as preparation of feasibility studies, plans and specifications, and on-site inspection of City projects. The City Engineer also reviews all development proposals and plans. OBJECTIVES: - Assist the City in determining right-of-way needs - Keep construction project files up-to-date and accurate - Communicate in written form to affected residents at least two (2) times during a construction project - Provide in-house engineering where feasible - Provide good public relations with property owners adjacent to construction projects - Resolve construction issues promptly. HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: 1.00 City Engineer .50 FIT Engineer Technician .25 FIT Clerical Supplies/Materials: Computer maintainance/Upgrade Books, Materials and Software Support Services: Contractual engineering for 2006 Contractual engineering technical assistance Cellular phone Airtime & Pager Conferences and mileage Subscriptions and Memberships Charges & Fees: Capital Outlay: 28 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: City Engineer DEPT 43010 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 .____2006 Staffing 94,212 108,273 101,302 122,891 58,976 132,147 132,147 0 Supplies/Materials 196 420 839 1,350 336 1 ,450 1 ,450 0 Support Services 1,380 5,339 15,136 13,550 (6,622) 20,850 20,850 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 5,795 219 610 3,150 0 3,150 3,150 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 101,582 114,251 117,887 140,941 52.690 157,597 157,597 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: City Engineer Hrs spent on City Projects Hrs charged to developers COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 101,582 114,251 117,887 140,941 52,690 157,597 157,597 0 - Program Revenues Public Projects Private Projects Other = Levy Dollars 101,582 114,251 117,887 140,941 52,690 157,597 157,597 0 STAFFING: Full time: City Engineer 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.00 Eng Technician 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 Clerical 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Part time: Clerical 29 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: DEPT NO: 43050 Provide supervision and support for all public works functions; provides for public works utilities, shop and equipment maintenance and fuels DEPARTMENT: Public Works Service DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: The Public Works Service department is responsible for all general public works duties, maintenance of all public works equipment, and maintenance of the public works facility. OBJECTIVES: - Perform preventative maintenance on all equipment within 100 miles or 10 hours of scheduled service - Perform 90% of City building repairs and preventative maintenance using City personnel HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Includes step increases Supplies/Materials: Includes motor fuel, maintenance of equipment and buildings, and inventory supply items Support Services: Uniforms for crew Janitorial Services Utilities and telephone service for public works building Conierence, mileage, meetings & seminars Miscellaneous - damage to private property (mailboxes, etc) Hazardous Waste Licenses Miscellaneous equipment rentals Memberships Charges & Fees: Capital Outlay: Replacement Radios Transfers: Transfer to Equipment Replacement Fund ($175,000 - 2006) Transfer to Stormwater Management Fund ($25,000 - 2006) 30 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Public Works Service DEPT 43050 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 166,852 165,723 178,292 281 ,335 104,132 239,701 254,324 0 Supplies/Materials 34,320 32,707 39,150 44,500 20,488 55,950 55,950 0 Support Services 24,112 29,048 28,850 29,950 14,782 37,200 37,200 0 Charges & Fees 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 655 2,926 3,152 23,410 350 75,475 75,475 0 Transfers 105,000 100,000 75,000 141 ,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 TOTAL 330,940 330.403 324.445 520,195 139,751 608,326 622,949 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No of Gopher One calls 2,800 2,800 2,940 2,940 2,940 2,940 2,940 2,940 No of vehicle repairs 110 110 1.10 110 110 110 110 110 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 330,940 330,403 324,445 520,195 139,751 608,326 622,949 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 330,940 330,403 324,445 520,195 139,751 608,326 622,949 0 STAFFING: Full time: Pub Wks Dir 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.75 0.75 Supervisor of Oper. & Maint. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 Lt Equip Oper 1.90 1.90 2.50 2.50 2.50 1.50 1.75 Clerical 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Utility Maint. Operators .00 .00 .00 .67 .67 Utility Lead .25 .25 31 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: DEPT NO: 43100 To maintain and upgrade City streets, parking areas and storm water control systems in an efficient and economical manner DEPARTMENT: Streets & Roadways DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: Includes ongoing maintenance consisting of street patching, street sweeping, roadside mowing, painting of lane markings, and minor storm sewer repair. OBJECTIVES: - Maintain the pavement management system to aid in scheduling of street projects - Paint lane markings on all designated streets - Sweep each City street at least once annually - Mow roadsides at least twice annually - Visually inspect storm drainage grates annually and repair as needed HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: 2.0 LEO 0.33 Util. Maint. Ops. Supplies/Materials: Rock, gravel & bituminous for street & road repair Support Services: Safety training Contracted road striping Transfers: Transfer to Local Street Reconstruction Fund $345,000 32 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Streets & Roadways DEPT 43100 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2.006 Staffing 62,839 55,335 74,773 122,000 42,004 108,534 108,534 0 Supplies/Materials 32,277 29,235 42,282 43,000 9,740 47,400 47,400 0 Support Services 8,930 7,546 9,402 9,000 0 20,000 20,000 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 200.000 200,000 183.500 311 ,000 0 345,000 345.000 0 TOTAL 304.045 292.117 309.956 485.000 51.744 520.934 520.934 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: Miles of street State 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 County 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 City - MSA 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 City - Local 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 Miles Sealcoated 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Tons of patch material 1,380 1,380 1,380 1,380 1,380 1,380 1,380 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 304,045 292,117 309,956 485,000 51,744 520,934 520,934 0 - Program Revenues MSA Maintenance 13,750 13,750 13,750 13,750 Transfer from Street Fund Budgeted Reserve = Levy Dollars 290,295 278,367 296,206 471,250 51,744 520,934 520,934 0 STAFFING: Full time: Lt Equip Operators 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Util. Maint. Operators 0.33 0.33 0.33 33 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: DEPARTMENT: Snow & Ice Removal DEPT NO: 43125 Provide snow and ice control for public streets and City owned parking lots to ensure the safe and efficient movement of traffic DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: This department is reponsible for the plowing and removal of snow after a 2-inch or greater snowfall has occured. Street sanding with a salt/sand mixture is used as a measure of ice control, and is performed as needed. OBJECTIVES: - Remove snow and ice and complete salt/sand operations within 14 hours after the end of a snow event - Complete widening and clean up functions within 48 hours of a snow event HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: .5 LEO Supplies/Materials: Sand and salt for ice control 34 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Snow & Ice Removal DEPT 43125 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 14,655 18,792 21,211 34,817 12,827 36,792 36,792 0 Supplies/Materials 25,358 21,629 15,490 30,000 12,613 33,000 33,000 0 Support Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 40,013 40.421 36.700 64.817 25,439 69.792 69,792 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: Miles of street plowed 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 Tons of salt used 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Tons of sand used 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Manhours spent 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 No. of cul-de-sacs 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 plowed COST INDICATORS: Expenditu res 40,013 40,421 36,700 64,817 25,439 69,792 69,792 0 - Program Revenues MN Snow Removal Aid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Levy Dollars 40,013 40,421 36,700 64,817 25,439 69,792 69,792 0 STAFFING: Full time: Lt Equip Oper (LEO) .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 35 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: Provide for street lighting and traffic signals at intersections and other locations throughout the City for the safety of pedestrians and vehicular traffic DEPARTMENT: Traffic Control/St Lights DEPT NO: 43160 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: Includes maintenence of semaphores and traffic control devices, and maintenance/replacement of regulatory and informational road signs. Provides for electricity for street lights and traffic control devices. OBJECTIVES: HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Supplies/Materials: Maintenance to semaphores and Hwy 7 & Vine Hill Road, Christmas Lake Road, County Road 19, Hwy 41 and Old Market Road Street signs & posts Support Services: 36 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Traffic Control/Street Lighting D EPT 43160 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 20Q6 Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies/Materials 1,249 2,750 1,979 6,000 2,619 6,000 6,000 0 Support Services 33,229 33,914 31,672 34,000 14,254 36,400 36,400 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 34.478 36.665 33,651 40.000 16.873 42.400 42.400 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No of street lights 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 No of traffic signals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 34,478 36,665 33,651 40,000 16,873 42,400 42.400 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 34,478 36,665 33,651 40,000 16,873 42,400 42,400 0 STAFFING: 37 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT: Sanitation/Waste Rmv/Weeds DEPT NO: 43200 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: DEPARTMENT MISSION: Provide for the general sanitation and cleanliness of the City and provide for the treatment of noxious weeds on City properties. Activities include spraying of boulevards and roadways for weed control, and clean-up of properties in violation of City zoning and sanitation codes, as necessary. OBJECTIVES: - Aid in private property cleanup complaints - Resolve 100% of weed complaints HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Miscellaneous staff time for property clean-ups Support Services: Miscellaneous property clean-ups Contracted weed spraying services 38 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Sanitation/Waste Removal/Weeds DEPT 43200 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 1,138 362 0 633 538 648 648 0 Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 400 0 500 500 0 Support Services 2,854 6,163 2,876 4,100 3,047 4,300 4,300 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3,993 6,525 2.876 5,133 3,585 5,448 5.448 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No of weed complaints 2 2 2 2 2 2 No of notices served 1 1 1 1 1 1 No of parcels sprayed 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miles/roadside sprayed 10 10 10 10 10 10 Spraying in Dollars 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 3,993 6,525 2,876 5,133 3,585 5,448 5,448 0 - Program Revenues Fed Disaster Aid = Levy Dollars 3,993 6,525 2,876 5,133 3,585 5,448 5,448 0 STAFFING: 39 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: To provide diseased tree inspection services to residents; to remove diseased trees located on City property; and to maintain and trim trees located on City rights-of-way and other property DEPARTMENT: Tree Maintenance DEPT NO: 43250 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: This department is responsible for detection and removal of diseased and unsafe trees on City rights-of-way and other properties, and pruning of trees on city property. Tree inspection services are provided to citizens on an on-call basis. OBJECTIVES: - Remove 100% of diseased trees on public property - Respond to all property owner requests to identify diseased trees. - Maintain and trim trees on City property which present a hazard to public HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Supplies/Materials: Small Tools Paint for tree marking Support Services: Contracted tree and brush removal Tree inspection certification . 40 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Tree Maintenance DEPT 43250 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2996 Staffing 14,912 14,929 18,882 11 ,396 13,852 30,305 15,121 0 Supplies/Materials 369 206 1,048 1,800 0 2,700 2,700 0 Support Services 5,435 2,265 11,688 13,350 1,631 15,000 15,000 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 20,715 17,400 31.619 26.546 15.484 48.005 32.821 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: No of trees removed 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Yards of brush hauled 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 20,715 17,400 31,619 26,546 15,484 48,005 32,821 0 - Program Revenues = Levy Dollars 20,715 17,400 31,619 26,546 15,484 48,005 32,821 0 STAFFING: .. Lt Equip Operator (LEO) .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .50 .25 41 FUND: 101 General DEPARTMENT MISSION: Maintain City parks, trails & beaches to ensure s and enjoyable recreational amenities, and coordi recreational opportunities for City residents of all ages and physical abilities DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation DEPT NO: 45200 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The department is responsible for the maintenance of all City parks, including playgrounds, ballfields, trails, ice rinks, buildings and other play areas. Winter ice skating, and summer recreation programs are coordinated within this department. OBJECTIVES: - Continue promoting the benefits of investing in Shorewood parks, and develop support for funding operation and park improvements _ Identify needs and assist the Shorewood Parks Foundation in coordination of fundraising efforts (to replace diminishing park dedication fees). HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS: Staffing: Includes step increases Part time includes Park Commission Secretarial Seasonal includes Summer employees and Winter Rink Attendants Supplies/Materials: Small tools Maintenance to park equipment and buildings Rock, black dirt, gravel, sand, fertilizers, seed for parks Support Services: Park Coordinating Services Contracted weed control in parks Park utility and telephone charges Rental of portable toilets Contribution to Senior Recreational Program Services Charoes & Fees: Capital Outlay: .. Transfers: Transfer to Park Capital Improvement Fund $10,000 Transfer to Land Conservation & Open Space Fund $5,000 42 FUND: 101 DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation DEPT 45200 BUDGET Actual Actual Actual Budget YTD June Requested Proposed Adopted ITEM 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 Staffing 110,551 1 09,453 104,076 130,527 51,776 137,054 137,054 0 Supplies/Materials 10,367 9,273 11 ,341 14,600 3,460 13,250 13,250 0 Support Services 39,197 45,814 52,862 64,000 24,432 70,800 70,800 0 Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 291,678 0 (1,415) 375 5,000 375 375 0 Transfers 213,700 30.000 15.000 15.000 0 15.000 15.000 0 TOTAL 665.493 194.539 181.864 224.502 84.668 236.479 236.479 0 SERVICE INDICATORS: Acres of maint park 95.80 95.80 95.80 95.80 95.80 95.80 95.80 No. of ballfields Softball 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Baseball 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 No. of shelters 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 No. of hockey rinks 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 No. of skating rinks 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Miles of Trails 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Cost of maint per acre 1,327 1,316 1,217 1 ,493 671 1,561 1,561 No. of times rinks are cleaned & resurfaced 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 No. of picnic tables 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 No. of Tennis Courts 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 COST INDICATORS: Expenditures 665,493 194,539 181,864 224,502 84,668 236,479 236,479 0 - Program Revenues Sports Organizations 12,000 12,000 See CIP See CIP Tonka Bay - Beach 500 500 0 0 Transfer from Trail Fund 3,000 3,000 0 0 Capital Levy 10,000 10,000 15,000 15;000 = Levv Dollars - Maint. 665,493 194,539 156,364 199,002 84,668 221 ,479 221 ,479 0 .. STAFFING: Full time: Lt Equip Oper/Foreman 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Clerical .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .33 .33 .33 Part time: Clerical -- Seasonal: Summer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Winter (rinks) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 43 ~ . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council ^ ~ Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator W September 8, 2005 . SLMPD 2006 Interim Funding and Resolution Proposal On August 19,2005, the Coordinating Committee of the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) endorsed the "final version" of a proposal by its chair, Greenwood Mayor Bob Newman, for funding the Department's 2006 recommended budget and for working through the issues of differing positions among the member city councils. This proposal is attached. During the week of August 22, the city councils of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, and Greenwood approved the Coordinating Committee "final version" proposal. On August 29, the Excelsior City Council did not approve the proposal, but offered modified it and sought approval by the other three city councils (see attachment). Excelsior's proposal had four parts: 1. Payment of$14,000 for Tier II service for September 1 - December31, 2005. 2. Payment of an additional $12,000 [above its authorized $400,000, a 0.0% increase] for services in 2006. 3. Payments to be conditioned on Excelsior receiving full and uniform level of police services as other SLMPD member cities from September 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006. 4. If no determination is reached on the 2001 operating budget by September 1, 200Q, the 2007 operating budget would remain at municipal payments of$1,355,932 [the same sum as has been in place since 2003]. The proposals compare as follows: 1. 2006 funding for operations: Coordinating Cmte Excelsior Excelsior Greenwood Shorewood Tonka Bay 26.5% 8.5% 48.5% 16.0% 27.0% 8.5% 49.0% 16.0% Excelsior @ 26.5% = - $412,000 @27.0%=-$420,000 1fcrt n ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Excelsior Proposal for SLMPD 2006 Interim Funding and Resolution September 12, 2005, City Council Meeting Page 2 ~ . 2. Coordinating Committee: All four cities agree to continue with work begun by the Issues Group. Excelsior: Not mentioned; resumption of discussions could be inferred. 3. Coordinating Committee: JPA discussions to be completed by December 31,2005, unless extended by all parties. Excelsior: Not mentioned [i.e., no deadline]. 4. Coordinating Committee: If December 31 or subsequent deadline passes without agreement, procedures to reorganize membership or conditions of membership to begin immediately. Excelsior: Not mentioned [i.e., specifically did not want appear to have pre-approval of the possibility of dissolution]. 5. Coordinating Committee: Excelsior to be provided Tier II service for remainder of2005 [i.e., one-third of year] at no additional cost. Excelsior: Excelsior would pay $14,000 for Tier II service for remainder of2005 [i.e., one- third of the - $42,000 that it was requested to pay for recommended 2005 budget]. . 6. Coordinating Committee: Proposal valid through August 31, 2005. Excelsior: Not mentioned directly; a September 1, 2006, date could be inferred. . Status of Excelsior Proposal: Coordinatint! Committee: Excelsior's proposal was addressed to the SLMPD Coordinating Committee, which met in emergency session on August 31 in order to respond to Excelsior's request to pay for Tier II service beginning September 1. The Coordinating Committee determined the Excelsior proposal was beyond its scope of authority for action. While it could respond under the . JP A to the request for Tier II services, the matter was placed with three other conditions that were not within the JP A, and thus needing approval by all city councils. It gave provisional approval to implement Tier II services for Excelsior, provided that Excelsior made this request decoupled from the other three conditions in its proposal. Excelsior: At its meeting on September 6, the Excelsior City Council did not act to decouple its request for Tier II services. Greenwood: At its meeting on September 6, the Greenwood City Council took no action on the Excelsior proposal. Shorewood: The City Council will consider the proposal at its September 12 meeting. Tonka Bav: The City Council will consider the proposal at its September 13 meeting. CITY COUNCIL ACTION. The City Council could: a) Approve the Excelsior Proposal of August 29, 2005; or . b) Acknowledge receipt and take no action on the Excelsior Proposal of August 29, 2005, and restate that the Council has already approved the "final version" proposal endorsed by the Coordinating Committee within the August 31 deadline. . . . . . Temporary "Make-Whole" Proposal-Final Version 1. All four cities make a one-year commitment to fully fund the proposed 2006 SLMPD Operating Budget at the following contribution percentages: Excelsior 27.0 Greenwood 8.5 Shorewood 48.5 Tonka Bay 16.0 100.0 2. All four cities agree to continue with the work begun by the Issues Group. 3. JP A discussions must be completed by December 31, 2005, unless extended by all four cities. 4. If the December 31, 2005, or the extended deadline passes without agreement, procedures to reorganize the membership or conditions of membership shall commence immediately thereafter. 5. Upon all four cities' approval of this proposal, all cities will immediately receive full service for the remainder of2005, and with no additional cost to the City of Excelsior. 6. All four cities must agree to this proposal no later than August 31,2005. CITY OF EXCELSIOR . September 6, 2004 339THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 TEL: 952-474-5233 FAX: 952-474-6300 f Mr. Craig Dawson, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood,~ 55331-8926 bye-mail and U.S. Mail . Re: Interim Agreement Regarding Police Dispute Dear Mr. Dawson: Enclosed is a copy of my August 30, 2005 letter to the SLl\1PD Coordinating Committee . transmitting Excelsior's proposal to facilitate continued negotiations to resolve the ongoing dispute between the cities. The Coordinating Committee met in emergency session on August 31, 2005 to consider this offer. At that meeting, the Committee determined that, although it was willing to approve the portion of the proposal that fell within the scope of its authority, the vast majority of the proposal needed to be acted on by each member city. I am, therefore asking you to seek a response to Excelsior's proposal from your city council at . the earliest opportunity. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ~~{Gr. W~ Laurence E. Whittaker City Manager cc: Mark Kelly . . CITY OF EXCELSIOR 339THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 TEL: 952-474-5233 FAX: 952-474-6300 August 30, 2005 Coordinating Committee South Lake Minnetonka Police Department 24150 Smithtown Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . Re: Interim Agreement Regarding Police Dispute Dear Committee Members: . Enclosed is City of Excelsior Resolution No. 2005-32 approving a contribution of $400,000 by the City of Excelsior to the 2006 SLMPD annual operating budget. Based upon our current JPA, this means that the 2006 operating budget may not exceed $1,355,932. 'When the Excelsior City Council passed this resolution at a special meeting held on August 29, 2005, it also authorized me to extend an offer to facilitate continued negotiations to resolve the ongoing dispute between the cities on the following terms: . 1. Excelsior agrees to pay an additional $14,000 toward the 2005 SLMPD operating budget above the $400,000 previously authorized. 2. Excelsior agrees to pay an additional $12,000 toward the 2006 SLMPD operating budget above the $400,000 authorized by Resolution No. 2005-32. 3. The above payments are conditioned on Excelsior receiving the full and uniform level of police services as the other SLMPD member cities from September 1,2005 through December 31,2006. 4. Under this proposal, ifno determination is reached regarding the 2007 operating budget by September 1, 2006, the 2007 operating budget would remain at $1,355,932. . This proposal exceeds the financial contribution requested this month by the cities of Greenwood, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay as part of the "Make-Whole Proposal" to facilitate continued negotiations by approximately $6000. There are no other conditions to this offer except those stated above. Letter - SLMPD Coordinating Committee RE: Interim Agreement Regarding Police Dispute August 30, 2005 Page 2 . Once all parties promptly agree to these financial terms, we anticipate that all parties will, in good faith, immediately resume discussions to resolve outstanding issues. We look forward to a favorable response. . ~[.w~ Laurence E. Whittaker . City Manager . . . City of Excelsior Resolution No. 2005 - 32 Resolution Approving Funds for the 2006 Operating Budget for the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department WHEREAS, the City of Excelsior is party to a Joint Powers Agreement ("JP A") creating the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department ("SLMPD"); and WHEREAS, the JP A as amended provides that each city that is a party to the JPA must determine the amount it proposes to contribute to the SLMPD operating budget prior to September 1 of the year immediately preceding the year in which the annual operating budget is to be in effect. . NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Excelsior resolves that it authorizes a contribution of $400,000 toward the SLMPD operating budget for 2006. Adopted this 29th day of August, :2005. . . ATTEST:,1 J~ )2~ Janlif;S R. Olds, City Clerk/Treasurer ..., ~~~.w~ Laurence E. "Wbittaker, City Manager . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD . 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Birch Bluff Road Residents FROM: Brad Nielsen, City Planner DATE: 9 September 2005 RE: Request for No Parking Signs FILE NO. Streets (Birch Bluff Road) This is to advise residents/property owners of Birch Bluff Road that the City Council will, at its regular meeting on Monday, 12 September 2005, consider a petition by area residents to install permanent ''No Parking" signs on the north side of the street, between Grant Lorenz Road and Eureka Road. Many of you may have signed the petition, however, it is the City's policy to advise all adjoining property owners that may be affected by the change. Shorewood's Planning and Engineering staff will be recommending approval of the parking restrictions. If you have questions or comments relative to this matter, you may appear the meeting on Monday night, call the Shorewood "Shoreline" at 952-474-3236, Ext. 1, or e-mail the Council at cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us Cc: Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator Bryan Litsey, Police Chief Mark DuCharme, Fire Chief 1Pq D #It ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 0 26260 II:: N z 26175 w 26310 II:: 0 ....J 619 I- z 621 ~ 26245 CJ 5425 26375 I:,f " I:::;: y 26045 I- en o 0:: :r: I- 26115 fl50 26075 25990 26020 25985 26025 25960 25920 25955 ;t58'(P~ 5420 25880 e\f~.cr\ e\.-Uff RO v 25925 25845 ~ I- p.:,/g> o z o u w . 25810 25680 25660 25620 570 25760 574 25775 25695 25725 v \I 5320 v 25655 5300 25630 . 2558 531 CT 533 o 0::: ~ w 0:: ::> w 537 I- Mayor & City Council Planning Commission City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 /cJt:~ ,K'&qJl/E'Jr ..9~.uS g~ ;tJt//O,u ,Le? 7" ?//V'c-..s WI..(bre'iA-1 ~fl ~ oS J/./ ~ .Lc:=- . August 2005 Subject: Permanent no parking on the North side of Birch Bluff Road Dear Council & Planning Members;' . The undersigned residents of Birch Bluff Road request your consideration, approval and erection of no parking signs on the north side of Birch Bluff Road between . Eureka Road and Grant Lorenz Road. This is a public safety issue. This request is justified based on the following facts: . Birch Bluff is a hilly narrow road just wide enough for two cars to pass. . There are no sidewalks and the road is often used by walkers, runners and bikers. . Many trucks, and boat trailers going to Howard's Point Marina, use the road. . It is a thoroughfare for vehicles traveling from highway 12 to highway 7 and communities to the southwest. . When vehicles are parked on both sides of the road across from each other emergency vehicles could have great difficulty passing through or be blocked completely. . Vehicles parked on the north side of Birch Bluff can block mail delivery. . School children walk to and wait for the bus on the road. . School buses have been 20 minutes late because they cannot get through. . . Respectfully submitted: Signatures of both parties Address Telephone number ~ j 1. ~ (f!: ~ .At/ UJ ;j~ ftI( tf. ers:: Ylo.,.: 77 0 77l~ ~ /1 II 2.'~ ~ '::>C5\1' R~ 8-5otCOGj &"rch 6\u* qs)'4iO'f~ 3. ~~J/fl<<lesmJ 2.{gIQS ~~~10) 'V'?~l.\1t1.P?1f3 4. ~ 5i~'vU/. StJ'- 1-h2-/.( 13 i /LOt- lSurfPP q D-.- '-i 1 d fa (, l./u 1.;1. '~~..' ....... '2b \ ~ 1) Bl~ 6J LYfF b \~.'Y? r ) ~~'-I ~(>.\ \ 't cQ~, ~'1" " c< ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~"r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~._.; "'"" e". ~ "'"" 9C "'"" ;'I "'"" ~ j \ ~ .~ \.1'\ CV\ r- ;.. !'(J ~ ~\~ ~. ~~& ~~ .~ ro {~ ~ j U)~. -", ~j. 0' tC'l. ..5 f{\ t ~ M (~ J'f) , \~ _I \ '" , ..4 '" c ~ 0 f"\ ~ 0\'+ /'0 t'-- "':r "'t\ ... ~ ~ ~ \./) ~~ ~ ~~ ~~. tJ ~~\ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~t ~i ~ 1 f ~~ ~ \t a ~~ ~ U)}~. .. a:J: r (tJ~ ~ ~ a ~ .~ ~ ,~ -r~ \J VJ A :0 ~ ~ i ~ ~ "~ v ~:1 ) -~ ~' ~ 00 ~ ~ ti) ~ \5;, ~ ~, ~ (.) ~ ~ \J') ~ rY ~ '1 ~ x \.q ,~--.. ..5 ~ " <.9 .~ ""l ~ ~) <" '~":::> ~ V) 0 ~ ~ ""~ "VI \ ~~ ~ ~~~'t ~. ~,,~ :i~ \ . ~~, -- ~ -~ !:" ~ ~ ~ ';: -> 00 ~ ~ : '_ N CO") ~ tr) \0 l" 00 0'\ 0 - N CO") ~ N N N N N N N N CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") CO") ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. ~~~~\ A RESOLUTION PROHIBITING PARKING ALONG PORTIONS OF BIRCH BLUFF ROAD WHEREAS, Birch Bluff Road is not of sufficient width to permit parking on both the north and south side of the roadway for safe passage of emergency vehicles, school buses and the general public; and WHEREAS, the City has received a petition from residents whose properties abut Birch Bluff Road, requesting "No Parking" signs to be posted on the north side of Birch Bluff Road; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that parking of vehicles is hereby prohibited on those portions of roadway described as follows: On the North side of Birch Bluff Road, starting at the westerly boundary of Grant Lorenz Road and continuing to the westerly boundary of Eureka Road. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 12th day of September, 2005. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works . DATE: September 8, 2005 RE: Accept Feasibility Report and Authorize Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate for the Interconnection of the Southeast Area and Amesbury Area Water Systems . Included in the City Council packet is a feasibility report, prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc., for consideration of the interconnection of the Southeast Area and Amesbury Area water systems. Background The interconnection of the two systems is critical to the stability of both the Amesbury and SE Area systems for the following reasons: . Amesbury is a hydro-pneumatic system that does not have a reservoir for backup supply. Any control equipment failures, pump failures, or power outages brings the system to a halt. There are 167 accounts that are serviced by this system. The SE Area system, which is the City's largest system, is connected to the water tower on Old Market Road. This system serves 451 accounts. Although the SE Area system is served by a water tower, there is only one well that can feed this tower. Failure of the well or controls, "starts the clock ticking on the reservoir." During summer months, this equates to approximately 36 hours of reserve (assuming no fires). During non- peak months, the tower can supply approximately 72 hours of demand. . Recently, staff learned that ordering and replacement of the well motor for this system will take a minimum of three-weeks. on an emergency basis. While an interconnection exists with the City of Minnetonka, it is unreasonable to expect the City of Minnetonka to supply the SE area demand for a three-week time period, during summer months. Interconnection of the Amesbury System, the SE Area System, and the SE Area Water Tower accomplishes the following: n to., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER it-- IDA Mayor and City Council Consideration of the Feasibility Report for the Interconnection of the Amesbury and SE Area Water Systems September 8, 2005 Page 2 of3 .' I . 1. Each system can serve as a backup pumping source for each other. 2. The Amesbury System would have access to water during power outages, and equipment failures due to connection ofthe SE Area Water Tower. 3. Interconnection of the systems saves a substantial amount of funds, versus construction ofa backup well to the SE Area system. Report The City's engineering consultant was required to model each to the two water systems to detemllne if the elevations, pumping capacities, and water tower located on Old Market Road are compatible. The conclusion of the analysis is indicates that the system can be interconnected. The quote taken from the executive summary is: . "Connecting the NE (AmesburyJ and SE systems is feasible and would provide better service to the NE system with little effect on the SE system. " Having determined that the systems are compatible, the question becomes what is the preferred route for the utility. The report considered two main routes, with an alternative sizing for each route. Routes and associated costs are shown in Table 1 below: . Alternative lA-8" IB - 12" 2A-8" 2B - 12" Cost Item Connecting Connecting Connecting Connecting Main via St. Main via St. Main via Main via Albans Bay Rd Albans Bay Rd Manor Rd Manor Rd and Manor Rd and Manor Rd Only Only Total Estimated $829,000 $942,000 $958,000 $1,094,000 Construction Cost Engineering, Admin, $207,000 $236,000 $239,000 $273,000 and Leeal Fees (25%) Total Estimated $1,036,00 $1,178,000 $1,197,000 $1,367,000 Probable Pro.iect Cost . Table 1 Staff will briefly present the alternatives considered and the associated pros and cons of each alternative at Monday's City Council meeting. It should be noted that Staffs recommendation differs slightly from WSB's recommendation. Staff is recommending that plans and specifications be prepared for Alternative lB. Staff feels that this . alternative is the most cost-effective route, and also corresponds to the City's Comprehensive Water Distribution Plan that was prepared in 1996. t . . . . . Consideration of the Feasibility Report for the Interconnection of the Amesbury and SE Area Water Systems September 8, 2005 Page 3 of3 Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of a resolution that accepts the feasibility report for the for the Interconnection of the Amesbury and SE Area Water Systems, and authorizes preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate for said project. A resolution for this item will be provide at Monday's meeting. "" CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 12,2005 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET For the record, please print your name and address below. Thank you. Name Address 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 12,2005 Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Prepared for: 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 (763) 541-4800 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Prepared by: . WSB & Associates, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FEASIBILITY REPORT CONNECTION OF THE SOUTHEAST AREA WATER SYSTEM TO THE NORTHEAST AREA WATER SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA September 12, 2005 Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 (763) 541-4800 (763) 541-1700 (Fax) Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ WSB Infrastructure I Engineering I Planning I Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 & Associates, Inc. September 12, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Feasibility Report Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System City of Shorewood, MN WSB Project No. 1608-04 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report which addresses the connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System. We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 763-541-4800 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. K~ ~ #~a.", Kevin F. Newman, P.E. Proj ect Manager Enclosure srb Minneapolis I St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. ~ /" /l~~ Kevin F. Newman, P.E. Date: September 12, 2005 Lic. No. 25198 Prepared By: Date: September 12, 2005 Quality Control Review By: r'-.\~ _ ~ . .~ David E. Hutton, P.E. Date: September 12, 2005 Lic. No. 19133 Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANS MITT AL CERTIFICA TION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXE CUTIVE SU'MMAR Y ....... ......... ...... ....... .... ....... ... ...... ......... ....... ...... ....... ..... ......... .... 1 A. Existing Conditions .............. ...... ................... ....................... .................... ................ 1 B. Future Conditions........ .... .......................................... ............................. ............. ..... 2 2. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................................5 3. EXISTING CO ND ITI ONS ............................................................................................... 6 A. Existing Service Area............ ..... .................. ........................ .................... ................ 6 B. Water Service Connections... ..... ...... ............ ............................................................ 6 C. Existing Water Supply and Storage ......................................................................... 6 D. Water Demands ................. ......... ..... ........ .... ........ .......... ..... ...... ... ...... ............ ...... ..... 7 E. Existing Distribution System ... ................. ............ ...... ........... ......... ........... .............. 9 4. FUTURE CO ND ITI 0 NS ................................................................................................ 11 A. Projected Service Area...................................................................................... ..... 11 B. Projected Population and Residential Water Service Connections ........................ 11 C. Water Demand Projections..... ..... ................ .......................................... ............ .... 11 D. Fire Protection........................................................................................................ 12 s. WATER SUPPLY EV ALUA TION ................................................................................ 13 6. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EV ALUA TION ................................................................. 14 A. Distribution System Modeling............................................................................... 14 B. Analysis of Alternatives.. ........... ............... ................. ............. ...................... ......... 14 C. Storage Evaluation................................................................................................. 17 7. SU'MMARY AND RECO~NDA TIONS ................................................................. 19 Appendix A Figures (1-26) Appendix B Opinion of Probable Costs, Tables 6-12 Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. EXECUTIVE SU'MMARY The City's southeast (SE) water system and.northeast (NE) water system currently operate as two independent systems. The City is considering connecting these two systems in an effort to provide more reliable water service to the existing customers in those two water service areas and to proposed development in the northeast area. The executive summary is a brief summary of findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the Connection of the SE area water system to the NE area water system. Connecting the NE and SE systems is feasible and would provide better service to the NE system with little effect on the SE system. A. Existing Conditions The SE water system currently serves the area generally bounded by Vine Hill Road on the west, Old Market Road and Sweetwater Curve on the east, State Highway 7 on the north, and the Shorewood City limits on the south. Water users in the SE water system consist of residential, commercial and public. The NE water system serves the area along Knights Bridge Road, Regents Walk, and Bays Water Road directly north of Glendale Road. In addition, St. James Gate, Old Kent Road, and Andover Place, all within the City of Deephaven, are served by the NE water system. Table 1 is a summary of the water demands for the SE and NE water system service areas. Table 1 Summary of Total Average Day Water Usage Northeast Water System Southeast Water System, Total Year (Amesbury), Total Average Day Average Day Water Usage (gpd)(l) Water Usa2e (2pd)(1,2) 2002 47,229 162,284 2003 58,795 202,325 2004 48,280 184,111 Average 51,435 183,000 (1) 10% was added to the total water sold for unaccounted for water usage. (2) Includes Deephaven Water Connections Figure 1 included in Appendix A illustrates the existing SE and NE water systems. The existing SE water system generally consists of: 1. One water production well (Well No.7) with 950 gpm pumping capacity, 2. Horizontal pressure filter for removal of iron and manganese, 3. 400,000 gallon elevated storage tank, 4. Over 43,000 feet of watermain ranging in diameter from 6 to 12 inches, and 5. 661 connections Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The existing NE water system generally consists of: 1. Two water production wells (Wells No.1 and No.6) with 560 gpm combined pumping capacity, 2. 5,000 gallon hydropneumatic tank to maintain pressure on the system, 3. Over 13,000 feet of watermain ranging in diameter from 8 to 10 inches, and 4. 167 connections. The existing SE and NE water systems were evaluated using an extended period simulation (BPS) computer model (WaterCAD V6.5) to determine their capacity under various system conditions. Details regarding existing system capacity, demands, and modeling are discussed in section 3. System modeling indicated the following deficiencies. Summary of Deficiencies . High minimum hour pressures in both the NE and SE water systems. . Large pressure fluctuation in the NE water system. . Limited fire protection in the NE water system. B. Future Conditions Expansion of the SE and NE water systems is proposed north of Hwy 7 to serve existing homes along St. Albans Bay Road, along Manor Road and along Suburban Drive. The service area would also serve planned development at the comer of Suburban Drive and Manor Road and in the northeast comer of Hwy 7 and Manor Road. The expanded service area would include approximately 82 additional residential units for a total of 733 residential connections, 9 commercial connections and 1 church connection. With the additional residential units the average day and maximum day demands for the combined SE and NE water system service area are estimated to be 272,000 gpd and 1,362,000 gpd respectively. Minimum fire flow requirements are assumed to be 1,000 gpm. Two general alternatives were evaluated for connection of the SE water system to the NE water system and to serve the additional homes in the expanded service area. Alternative 1 includes connection to the existing 12-inch watermain near Hwy 7 and St. Albans Bay Road and then extending the watermain north along St. Albans Bay Road and then northeast along Manor Road to Knights Bridge Road where connection to the NE water system would be made. Water service to the residential units along Suburban Drive would be provided by extending a branch watermain from Manor Road north along Suburban Drive. Figure 6 included in Appendix A shows Alternative 1. Under Alternative lA the connecting watermain and branch watermain would be 8-inch diameter and under Alternative IB the connecting watermain and branch watermain would be 12-inch diameter. Alternative 2 includes connecting to the existing 12-inch watermain on Manor Road in the Barrington Subdivision and then extending the watermain north and then northeast along Manor Road to Knights Bridge Road where connection to the NE water system would be made. To serve the homes along St. Albans Bay Road and Suburban Drive, branch Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I watermains would be extended from Manor Road, north and south along these roads. Figure 13 included in Appendix A shows Alternative 2. Under Alternative 2A the watermain extension for connecting the two systems would be 8-inch diameter and under Alternative 2B the watermains connecting the two systems would be 12-inch diameter. Table 2 is a summary of the Engineer's opinion of total probable construction and project cost for each of the alternatives. Table 2 Summary of Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Construction and Project Cost for Each Alternative to Connect the SE and NE water systems and Serve the expanded water system service area Alternative lA - 8" IB -12" 2A - 8" 2B - 12" Connecting Connecting Connecting Connecting Cost Item Main via St. Main via St. Main via Main via Albans Bay Albans Bay Manor Rd Manor Rd Rd and Rd and Only Only Manor Rd Manor Rd Total Estimated $829,000 $942,000 $958,000 $1,094,000 Construction Cost Engineering, Admin. $207,000 $236,000 $239,000 $273,000 and Legal Fees (25%) Total Estimated $1,036,00 $1,178,000 $1,197,000 $1,367,000 Probable Proiect Cost To connect the NE and SE systems, Alternative 2A or 2B are recommended. An 8-inch connecting watermain as described in Alternative 2A will provide adequate service and fire protection to the future service area, however, if additional homes want to connect to the City system beyond those identified in the project scope, a 12-inch diameter main, as described in Alternative 2B would, provide the water system more capacity for future expansion with a small cost increase. A phase approach to the design and construction of the improvements described in Alternative 2A and 2B is proposed. Phase I of the improvements would include installing only the watermain that connects the SE water system to the NE water system. Figure 20 (phase 1 - Alternative 2A and 2B) included in Appendix A shows the initial connection of the two systems and the first step in providing water to the future service area identified in the project scope and shown in Figure 13 (Alternative 2A and 2B). The total estimated project cost for an 8-inch connection main, Phase I - Alternative 2A, is approximately $523,000 as shown in Table 10. The total estimated project cost for a 12-inch connection main, Phase I - Alternative 2B, is approximately $597,000 as shown in Table 11. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Connecting the NE and SE systems is feasible and would provide fire protection and more consistent operating pressures in the NE system while having little effect on the SE system. There are a few pockets of homes in both the NE and SE system with minimum hour pressures around 110 psi due to their low elevation. It is recommended to not raise system pressures until this situation has been studied further. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The City's SE water system and NE water system currently operate as two independent systems. The City is considering connecting these two systems in an effort to provide more reliable water service to the existing customers in those two water service areas and to proposed development in the northeast area. The purpose of this technical memorandum is to evaluate the feasibility of connecting the SE water system to the NE water system. The scope of this technical memorandum will include a review of the existing conditions for the NE and SE water systems, presentation of projected future conditions, water supply evaluation, distribution system evaluation including storage analysis, evaluation of the possibility for connecting the two systems together, and recommended capital improvements costs. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Existing Service Area The existing NE service area can generally be described as the multi-family units along Knights Bridge Road, Regents Walk, and Bays Water Road directly north of Greendale Road. In addition, St. James Gate, Old Kent Road, and Andover Place, all within the City of Deephaven, are served by the NE water system. The SE system is generally bounded by Vine Hill Road (Shorewood City Limits) on the west, Old Market Road and Sweetwater Curve on the east, State Highway 7 on the north, and the Shorewood City Limits on the south. Multifamily units directly north of the intersection of Highway 7 and Old Market Road along Spring Circle and St. Albans Bay Circle are also served by the SE system. A 12-inch diameter main was recently extended from the Spring Circle/St. Albans Bay Circle area west to the Barrington Subdivision. B. Water Service Connections The NE water system has served a customer base consisting of residential water users. The NE water system currently serves 167 residential water connections. Thirty-eight of these water service connections are in the City of Deephaven. The SE water system serves a customer base consisting of residential, commercial and public. The SE water system currently includes 484 residential water connections, nine commercial water connections and one church connection. C. Existing Water Supply and Storage Northeast Water System Water is supplied to the NE water system by two water production wells, which are identified as City Well Nos. 1 and 6. The pumping capacity of Well No.1 is approximately 500 gpm and the pumping capacity of Well No.6 is approximately 60 gpm. No treatment or storage facilities, elevated or ground, are provided. A 5000 gallon hydropneumatic tank maintains pressure on the distribution system and helps in reducing the number of starts and stops by the well pumps. Southeast Water System Water is supplied to the SE water system by one water production well, which is identified as City Well No.7. The pumping capacity of Well No.7 is approximately 950 gpm. Treatment for removal of iron and manganese is provided to the SE water system by one horizontal pressure filter. A 400,000 gallon spheroid type elevated tank, constructed in 1988, provides storage for the SE water system. This elevated storage tank is 115 feet from the base to the bottom of the storage tank and 150 feet from the base to the overflow, giving a total potential operating range of 35 feet. The overflow elevation is at 1160 feet MSL. Under normal operating conditions Well Pump No.7 will start when the tower water level is Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System' WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I at 26 feet (1151 feet MSL) and stop when the tower water level is at 31 feet (1156 feet MSL). D. Water Demands Residential water usage per connection for the entire City of Shorewood water service area has averaged 335 gallons per connection per day. However, the residential water usage has averaged 276 gallons per connection per day in the NE system, and 325 gallons per connection per day in the SE system. This is the total volume of water sold each day divided by the total connections. Commercial water usage per connection has averaged 967 gallons per connection and water usage per connection for churches in the SE system has averaged 677 gallons per connection per day. In almost all waters systems, there is a difference in the volume of water produced and the volume of water sold to the customers. This portion of water is referred to as "unaccounted- for" water use. Unaccounted-for water is usually attributed to hydrant flushing, water main leaks, and un-metered water service connections. For this report, unaccounted-for water data was not available. Industry standards recognize unaccounted-for water use up to 10% as acceptable. For estimating purposes, 10% unaccounted-for water use was assumed to determine the total existing demands and for projecting future demands. Average daily water use, including residential, commercial, churches, assumed unaccounted-for water and total average day water use for the years 2002 through 2004 are summarized in Table 3. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Wqter System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 7 ------------------- Table 3 City of Shorewood Connection of the Northeast Water System and the Southeast Water System Historical Water Usage Northeast Water System (Amesbury), Southeast Water System, Water Usage Year Water Usa e (1) Residential, Unaccounted-for Total Residential Commercial Churches Unaccounted-for Total ( d) ( d) (2) ( d) ( d) ( d) ( d) ( d) (2) ( d) 2002 42,936 4,293 47,229 139,363 8,168 14,753 162,284 2003 53,450 5,345 58,795 174,214 8,307 1,411 18,393 202,325 2004 43,891 4,389 48,280 157,996 8,701 677 16,737 184,111 Avera e 46,759 4,676 51,435 157,191 8,392 1,044 16,628 183,000 (1) (2) Includes Deephaven Water Connections Assumed to be 10% Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Water production is typically measured in average day and maximum day units. Maximum day water production is influenced by high summertime water use, and tends to correlate with summertime precipitation levels. Measurement of maximum day water demand characterizes the highest typical water demand of the system, which will impact production, storage, and treatment facility sizing and operation. Maximum day water usage for 2002 through 2004 was not available when this report was prepared. In most water systems, a maximum day to average day peaking factor of 3.0 to . 4.0 is common, however some communities in the Lake Minnetonka area similar in size to Shorewood have exhibited much greater peaking factors. For modeling the existing systems and for projecting future maximum day demands, a maximum day to average day ratio of 5 was assumed. Based on historical water usage comparisons of other metro communities, and A WW A recommendations a ratio of peak hourly water usage demand to maximum day demand of 2.0 was assumed. A WW A recommends a peaking factor of 1.3-2.0. Figure 2 shows the estimated hourly demand fluctuation on a maximum day. Peak hour demands impact sizing of water distribution mains. I E. Existing Distribution System The existing NE water distribution system contains over 13,000 feet of water main ranging from 8 inches to 10 inches in diameter. Mains are either cast or ductile iron. There is approximately 43,000 feet of water main in the SE system. Mains are constructed of HDPE, cast iron, or ductile iron. Mains in the SE system range in diameter from 6 inches to 12 inches, with the exception of the main connecting the distribution system to the water tower which is 16 inches in diameter. Figure 1 illustrates the existing system. An extended period simulation (EPS) computer model (WaterCAD V6.5) was used to evaluate the existing water system's ability to provide adequate service under a variety of conditions and provide fire protection. The EPS model replicates the daily fluctuation of water demand versus time of day (hourly water usage, see figure 2). It offers a view of time-varying features such as tank levels, water system demand, pump on and off operation, and available fire flow. Figures 3, 4, and 5 show existing peak hour pressures, minimum hour pressures, and available fire flow, respectively. During peak hour conditions, the system exhibits pressures ranging from 52-79 psi, and 79-106 psi at minimum hour in the NE system. In the SE, pressures range from 59-108 psi at peak hour demand and from 62-113 psi at minimum hour. In the SE system, pressures fluctuate approximately 3-5 psi at any particular point, which is very stable. Well No.7 has a capacity close to peak hour demand allowing the tower to fill under most demand conditions. Over a 24 hour maximum day, Well 7 cannot supply demands from 7-9 a.m. and 7-9 p.m. Therefore, the tower will fill when Well 7 is on except during those times on a maximum day. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I Pressures fluctuate approximately 30 psi in the NE. The hydropneumatic tank is set to fluctuate by approximately that amount. When limited storage or no storage is available, well pumps should be sized for peak hour demand. Wells 6 and 7 will deliver much greater than peak hour demand. Water distribution mains are typically sized to deliver peak hour demands at pressures in the range of 40-110 psi, in accordance with American Water Works Association (A WW A) engineering standards. In addition, it is recommended for pressure fluctuation during the day to remain less than 30 psi. For fire protection, distribution mains must deliver 1,000- 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 20 psi for protection of the single family homes in the area. The existing NE system mains are appropriately sized and looped for fire protection and residential distribution. All mains will deliver greater than 1,000 gpm, however the hydropneumatic tank's volume is very small so it provides only a few minutes of fire protection. The 8-inch and 6-inch mains are capable of providing greater than 2,000 gpm fire flows, but can only provide approximately 100 gpm once storage is depleted in the tank. In addition, the hydropneumatic tank causes increased stress on the distribution mains because of the consistent pressure fluctuation of 30 psi. The existing SE system provides adequate service and fire protection. There are locations in the areas of Vine Ridge and east Market Street that exhibit pressures greater than 110 psi. Fire protection in the SE is satisfactory, with very few mains delivering less than 2,000 gpm. Summary of Deficiencies . High minimum hour pressures in both the NB and SE water systems. . Large pressure fluctuation in the NE water system. . Limited fire protection in the NE water system. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS As discussed, the City is considering connection of their SE water system to their NE water system. Sizing of the connection and other future system improvements for the combined water system will depend on the current water demands and any projected increases in water demands. The increase in water demands will depend on overall residential growth and the connection of residential units to the water system not currently served. A. Projected Service Area Based on discussions with City Staff, expansion of the water system is proposed to serve additional existing homes located along St. Albans Bay Road from State Hwy 7 to Manor Road, along Manor Road from St Albans Bay Road to Greendale Road, and along Suburban Drive from Manor Road to Forest Drive. Immediate expansion of the water system is proposed to serve planned new development at the northeast comer of Suburban Drive and Manor Road (Manor Park) and in the northeast comer of State Hwy 7 and Manor Road (Barrington Subdivision). B. Projected Population and Residential Water Service Connections The combined NE and SE water service area will consist of primarily residential water users. The total estimated number of residential units, including existing service and potential service to the areas described in section 4.A would be approximately 733. Assuming 3 people per residential unit the total estimated population served would be 2,199. C. Water Demand Projections Average day and maximum day water use projections for the design period are based on historical water usage, service area population projections, and development assumptions. Residential water use projections are based on the projected number of residential water service connections and the average water use per residential connection. Using the water use data from 2002 through 2004 for the City's water systems, average residential water use per connection is 325 gpd for the SE system. Per connection water use is expected to remain stable. By applying this per connection residential water use to 733, which is the projected number of residential connections, the total average day residential water usage would be 238,000 gpd. No additional commercial or church water service connections are anticipated. The number of commercial water service connections is expected to remain at 9 and the number of church water service connections is expected to remain at 1. Using the water use data from 2002 through 2004 for the City's SE water system's average commercial water use per connection is 967 gpd and the average water use per connection for churches is 677 gpd. The total average day commercial water usage, based on 9 connections would be 8,700 gpd and the total average day water use for the single church connection would be approximately 700 gpd. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Average day unaccounted-for water is projected to be approximately 10% of the total average day water use. Average day unaccounted-for water is projected to be 25,000 gpd. For projecting maximum day demands, a peaking factor 5.0 will be applied to the average day demands. Peaking factors will typically be in the range of 3.0 to 4.0, with a factor of 5.0 being the highest. Typically, as a community grows, the ratio of maximum day to average day water use will decrease. The maximum day demand used for modeling and design of future improvements for the combined water systems will be 1,362,500 gpd Total water use projections for the combined NE and SE water service areas, including residential use, commercial use, church use, unaccounted-for water use, total average day use and maximum day use, are shown in Table 4. Table 4 City of Shorewood Connection of the Northeast Water System and Southeast Water System Summary of Projected Water Usage Total Ave. Day A ve. Day Ave. Day Ave. Day, A ve. Day Max day to Residential Commercial Church Unacc - for Water A ve. day Max Day Water Use, Water Use, Water Use, Water Use, Use, Peaking Demand, GPD GPD GPD GPD GPD Factor gpd 238,000 8,700 700 25,000 272,400 5.0 1,362,000 D. Fire Protection The water demand required for fire protection is utilized in the evaluation of the water distribution system components. Often, the fire demands will determine the size of water storage, pumping, and distribution system elements. Fire protection for the City of Shorewood is provided by the Mound Fire department. The Insurance Services Office, Inc (ISO) determines fire insurance rates based on the adequacy of the fire protection system. The ISO ranks cities on a scale from 1 to 10 based on the fire department's communication system (10%), the water supply system (40%), and the fire department (50%), with Class 1 being the highest rating. Class 1 is comprised of the best fire departments, of which there are only about 45 in the United States. The Mound Fire Department was contacted to determine the fire protection rating for the City of Shorewood. The areas in Shorewood that have a fire hydrant within 1000 feet are given an ISO rating of 6 and the areas in Shorewood that do not have a fire hydrant within 1000 feet are given a rating of 9. When the ISO looks at maximum fire flow requirements for a community they will calculate the fire flow requirements for the 5th largest building in the community and use that fire flow as the maximum fire flow required for that community. The majority of the buildings in the NE and SE water system service areas are single family residential units. A minimum fire flow requirement of 1000 gpm will be used for these residential areas. Feasibility Report City 01 Shorewood Connection olthe Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. WATER SUPPLY EV ALUA TION Water is currently supplied to the NE water system by two wells with a combined pumping capacity of 560 gpm. Water is supplied to the SE water system by one well have a pumping capacity of 950 gpm With the two systems operating as separate water systems, the NE water system has a firm well pumping capacity of 60 gpm and the SE water system has no firm well capacity. Firm well capacity is defined as the capacity with the single largest well out of service. It is used as an indicator of a system's capacity for providing service with one well out of service due to maintenance work or an emergency event. Firm well capacity should meet or exceed the maximum day demands. With the two systems connected the firm capacity of the systems combined is 560 gpm or 806,400 gpd assuming the well pumps are running 24-hours per day. The well firm capacity of 806,400 gpd does not meet the projected maximum day demand of 1,362,000 gpd. However, it should be noted that in calculating the projected maximum day demand a conservative peaking factor of 5.0 was used. As discussed previously, in most water systems, a maximum day to average day peaking factor of 3.0 to 4.0 is common. Using a peaking factor of 3.0 would result in a projected maximum day demand of 817,200, which is very close to the firm pumping capacity of the combined water systems. Prior to planning for the construction of additional wells to meet the firm capacity, an investigation of the actual maximum day to average day peaking factors for the system should be made. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EV ALUA TION A. Distribution System Modeling To correct existing system deficiencies, there are several options available. All the alternatives evaluated include the connection of the two systems, and assume that the hydropneumatic tank will be removed, and operating controls for Wells 1 and 6 adjusted relative to the tower. For modeling, Wells 1 and 6 were used under high demand conditions. Under normal demands, Well 7 would supply most water so it can be treated by the existing pressure filter. Improvements could be accomplished through the following alternatives: 1. Service to existing homes and NE/SE connection via St. Albans Bay Rd. and Manor Rd. a. 8-inch water main for providing service to homes b. 8-inch water main for providing service to homes wi 12-inch trunk for future expansIOn 2. Service to existing homes and NElSE connection via Manor Rd. only a. 8-inch water mains throughout system b. 8-inch and 12-inch combination of water mains throughout system B. Analysis of Alternatives Alternative lA - 8-inch water main for service to existing homes and NE/SE connection via St. Albans Bav Road and Manor Road The existing homes to be served along with the system connection are shown in Figure 6. These homes are along St. Albans Bay Road from Hwy 7 to Manor Road, along Manor Road from St. Albans Bay Road to Greendale Road, and along Suburban Drive from Manor Road to Forest Drive. Also, Figure 6 shows the future mains required to serve these homes. The major difference between Alternative lA and 2A is Alternative lA ties into the SE system at Highway 7 and St. Albans Bay Road leaving the existing 12-inch dead end main at the Barrington subdivision. Figures 7 through 10 illustrate peak hour pressure, maximum day pressure, minimum hour pressure, and available fire flow for this alternative. The BPS model indicates a functional system under all operating conditions, providing adequate available fire flow . Available fire flow indicates the amount of water the mains can provide only if enough pressurized storage is available. . Connecting the two systems will correct two of the three deficiencies listed in section 3E. Fire protection will be provided and pressure fluctuation will be reduced from approximately 30 psi over the course of a day to a more consistent 10-20 psi daily fluctuation. Discussion of high pressures is included in the summary., Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I When possible it is recommended to loop water mains, which this alternative does not accomplish. Looping improves pressures and water quality. Therefore, if cost differences are not significant, it is recommended to loop the system as in Alternative 2A. However, this system will provide adequate service for the future service area and connect the NE and SE systems for the lowest cost. The engineer's opinion of total probable project cost for Alternative 1A is approximately $1,036,000 as shown in Table 6. Alternative 1B - 12-inch water main for service to existing homes and NE/SE connection via St. Albans Bay Rd. and Manor Rd. I The mains in this alternative are identical to those described in Alternative lA, except all are 12 inches in diameter, see Figure 6. Although the system would be functional with 8-inch mains, 12-inch mains would increase the level of service. Figures 11 and 12 show peak hour pressure and available fire flow for this alternative, Minimum hour and maximum day pressure are not shown because there were no significant changes to service. When compared to Alternative lA, this alternative would significantly improve fire flows in the NE system and higher peak hour pressures. As discussed in Alternative lA, connecting with an 8-inch would meet minimum requirements for the current system, however if the system is to be expanded beyond serving the existing homes identified in the project scope, it would be prudent to upsize this main to serve future demands. The engineer's opinion of total probable project cost for Alternative 1B is approximately $1,178,000 as shown in Table 7. Alternative 2A - 8-inch water main for service to existing homes and NElSE connection via Manor Rd. only The future service area and main route is identical to Alternative lA, however an additional main would be installed to loop the system. This future system is shown in Figure 13. To connect the two systems, an 8-inch main would be installed from the west end of the existing 12-inch dead end main serving the Barrington subdivision at Manor Road to the existing 8-inch main at the intersection of Knight's Bridge Road and Manor Road. Compared wI Alternative 1A peak hour pressures are higher with the looped system. When possible it is recommended to loop water mains. The comparison of Alternatives 1A and 2A show the improved pressures created by looping. The Barrington Subdivision would have improved water quality, which cannot be shown in modeling the system. Minimum hour pressures are similar to the non-looped in system in Alternative 1A. Since peak hour pressure is higher and minimum hour pressure remained the same, there is less pressure fluctuation, about 10 psi, with a looped system. This provides more consistent service and causes less stress on water mains. Available fire flow is better with the looped FeasibiljJy Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I system, especially near the intersection of Knights Bridge Road and Manor Road intersection. However, the remainder of the system is similar to Alternative 1A and provides over 1,000 gpm for fire flow. Figures 14 through 17 show peak hour pressure, maximum day pressure, minimum hour pressure, and available fire flow. The engineer's opinion of total probably project cost for Alternative 2A is approximately $1,197,000 as shown in Table 8. Alternative 2B - 12-inch water main for service to existing homes and NElSE connection via Manor Rd. only With this alternative, the main route is identical to Alternative 2B. The difference, as shown in Figure 13, is that all mains are upsized to 12 inches except the main serving the existing homes along St. Albans Bay Road, between Suburban Dr. and Hwy 7. Compared to Alternative 2A, there is only a slight increase in peak hour pressure, but a large increase in available fire flow. The majority of the NE system would have more than 2,000 gpm available. In Alternative 2A, the majority of the NE system would have only greater than 1,000 gpm available. Figures 18 and 19 show improved peak hour pressure and available fire flow. The difference between Alternatives 2A and 2B is the level of service. If the future system plans include service to other areas within the vicinity of the NE water system (beyond scope of this report), it would be prudent to upsize the trunk main to a 12-inch diameter. Increasing the main size from 8 inches to 12 inches will increase system operating pressures and available fire flow presently and increase capacity for future residential service. The engineer's opinion of total probable project cost for Alternative 2B is approximately $1,367,000 as shown in Table 9. Evaluation of Alternatives Table 5 is a summary of the Engineer's opinion of total probable construction and project cost for each of the alternatives described in the previous paragraphs Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 5 Summary of Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Construction and Project Costs Alternative 1A - 8" 1B-12" 2A - 8" 2B - 12" Connecting Connecting Connecting Connecting Cost Item Main via St. Main via St. Main via Main via Albans Bay Albans Bay Manor Rd Manor Rd Rd and Rd and Only Only Manor Rd Manor Rd Total Estimated $829,000 $942,000 $958,000 $1,094,000 Construction Cost Engineering, Admin. $207,000 $236,000 $239,000 $273,000 and Legal Fees (25%) Total Estimated $1,036,00 $1,178,000 $1,197,000 $1,367,000 Probable Project Cost Alternative 2A is the recommended alternative if the proposed service area will be the ultimate service area. If there is a chance service will be extended to other existing homes outside of the future service area then Alternative 2B is recommended. The cost difference between installing a 12-inch and 8-inch water main is minimal, which is the reason to give consideration to future plans beyond the scope of this report. Whichever condition the City would like to pursue, the initial construction in Phase 1 - Alternative 2A or 2B should be pursued. Initial construction is discussed in section 7.0. A few localized areas in the SE and NE top 110 psi, which can be corrected by individual pressure reducing valves (PRV) at the home or a larger system PRV. Further study for reducing these pressures requires more information regarding customer complaints, existing PRVs, and actual home elevations. It is recommended to not raise system pressures until this situation has been studied further. An 8-inch main was modeled along the City Corporate limits and Vine St. to connect the NE/SE systems. It did not serve the existing homes described in the project scope; therefore it was not cost effective. However, if service to those parcels is ever desired, it would provide an additional loop connecting the NE/SE systems. The engineer's opinion of total probable project cost for providing an 8-inch water main along the east Municipal Boundary Line and along Vine St. is approximately $284,000 as shown in Table 10. C. Storage Evaluation Currently, the NE water system has no storage and the SE water system has 400,000 gallons of elevated storage. In a water system, storage is needed to equalize demand on supply, treatment, and distribution facilities, and to provide a reserve capacity for emergency situations. Two methods are commonly used to evaluate the storage requirements for a water system. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The Minnesota Department of Health (MDOH) will typically refer tolO-State Standards, which recommends that a distribution system have an adequate elevated storage capacity and/or ground storage capacity with standby power for high service pumps to provide the average day water usage. The existing 400,000 gallon elevated storage tank meets this requirement. Storage capacity is also evaluated on a system's capability to provide equalization during peak demands without depleting the storage volume needed for fire fighting. Based on typical water use patterns for a community, storage should be capable of meeting the peak hour flow rate minus the maximum day flow rate over a period of at least 4 hours. An Equalization volume of 227,000 gallons is required based on projected maximum day and peak hour demands for the combined NE and SE water systems. Following a peak hour demand period, approximately 183,000 gallons would be available for fire fighting. This would provide the fire department with the capability of fighting a fire for over 3 hours at a fire demand of 1,000 gallons per minute. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Several alternatives, discussed in section 6, were developed to connect the NE and SE water systems in conjunction with providing City water to existing homes in the future service area. The two systems were modeled to determine their compatibility. For the systems to be compatible the existing NE wells need to have the ability to pump to the distribution system and fill the tower, operating pressures need to remain consistent and appropriate for distribution, and improve fire protection. The systems were modeled and acceptable operating pressures and fire flows resulted with the removal of the NE hydropneumatic tank. The hydropneumatic tank must be disconnected if the NE and SE are connected. Connecting the two systems had virtually no effect on the SE system. However, the NE system would gain fire protection and more consistent operating pressures. To provide water to the future service area identified in the project scope, the most cost effective solution is to route the connection main through the future service area. This solution will serve the existing homes and connect the NE and SE system at the same time. Other routes were modeled and found to be functional (Vine Street and East Corporate Limits). However, other routes did not provide water to the desired service area, so additional water mains would have to be constructed. Based on the future service area there are two possible connection routes. Both routes travel Southwest along Manor Road from the NE system end at the intersection of Knights Bridge Road and Manor Road to the intersection of Manor Road and St Albans Bay Road. At that point, the route is either southeast along St. Albans Bay road to connect to the existing 12-inch HDPE main at the intersection of Highway 7 and St. Albans Bay Road, or southwest along Manor Road to the end of the 12-inch HDPE main serving the Barrington subdivision just north of the intersection of Manor Road and Highway 7. Modeling indicated an improvement in pressures and available fire flow with the SE connection occurring at the west end of the existing 12-inch HDPE main serving the Barrington Subdivision. This alternative would not create any dead end mains, thus requiring less maintenance and improving water quality. Dependent upon the City's ultimate service area, either an 8-inch or 12-inch main would be installed from the west end of the existing 12-inch main serving the Barrington subdivision at Manor Road to the existing 8,-inch main at the intersection of Knight's Bridge Road and Manor Road, see Figure 20. This figure shows the initial connection of the two systems. It is the first step in providing water to the future service area identified in the project scope and shown in Figure 13. Below is an analysis and discussion of WaterCAD modeling for the initial connection of the NE and SE systems. Phase I - Alternative 2A - Initial connection for NElSE Systems with 8-inch Main along Manor Rd. Figure 20 shows the route for the future connecting main, whether 8-inch or 12-inch and system features. It is an initial connection of the systems with the future goal of achieving the service area included in Alternative 2A and 2B. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Demands on the initial connection will be lower than those of the entire future service area, so the WaterCAD model was developed to account for this change. Peak hour pressure, maximum day pressure, minimum hour pressure, and available fire flow is shown in figures 21, 22, 23, and 24 respectively. This alternative would provide adequate operating pressures and fire flows to the existing system with the goal of serving the entire future service area identified in alternative 2A and Figure 13. The engineer's opinion of total probable project cost for Phase I of Alternative 2A is approximately $523,000 as shown in Table 11. Phase I - Alternative 2B - Initial connection for NElSE Svstems with 12-inch Main along Manor Rd. The purpose of this alternative is to be the initial construction for Alternative 2B. A 12-inch main connecting the NE and SE system would be installed on the same route as the 8-inch main discussed in Phase 1 - Alternative 2A and shown in Figure 20. The proposed improvements would be identical to those discussed in Phase 1 - Alternative 2A, except the main would be 12 inches. As discussed in Alternative 2B, the system would be functional with an 8-inch connection; a 12- inch main would increase the level of service presently and increase capacity in the event other existing homes connect to City water. Figures 25 and 26 show peak hour pressure and available fire flow for initial construction of Alternative 2B. When compared to Phase 1 - Alternative 2A, this alternative would provide greater fire flows in the NE system and slightly higher peak hour pressure. As discussed in Alternative 2B, connecting with an 8-inch would meet minimum requirements for the current system, however if the system is to be expanded beyond serving the existing homes identified in the project scope, it would be prudent to up size this main to serve future demands. The engineer's opinion of total probable cost for Phase I of Alternative 2B is approximately $597,000 as shown in Table 12. Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 Page 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA EXISTING SYSTEM WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 W~B 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis. MN 55416 I 763-541-4800 lie """""latn. In<. FAX 763-541-1700 .1"liI:H.'I:(lr""J~~-=----~~[t11 ~ 1:11 :Il:...~ -j.j .~~~ I ~I::II ~~... I I OFT 750 1500 ------ 4' -6' -8' -12' -16' - EXISTING mm_n FUTURE FIGURE 1 I I I i \""".,' I I I .......-... \"" I I I I I ro'", 1 I Ij I; I~ ,.. 1 " , , , I I I I 1 ------1------ 1 , , , , , , , , , ------------- --------------~------ , , , , , , I I 1 , , , , --,--------------,--------------r-- , I , I I , I I I , I I , , I , , 1 , , , , I , , , , I I I 2.0 , , I I 1 I I I I I I -------------1------- , , , , , , , Figure 2 Estimated Hour Peaking Factor 1.5 ... .~ ~.o :l ~ , , , , , , , , , , , , ---------------------~------- , , , , , , , , , , _______ --------__-_--1--- , , , I I , I I 1 1 I I 1 , - __I , , , , , , 0.0 0.0 4.0 ----------~---------- , , , , I 1 1 I , , , , --,--------------T-------------- , I , 1 I I I I , , , , , , , , I I I , 8.0 12.0 Time (hr) 16.0 20.0 24.0 I e>:isti:-' :stem w-unaccounted w-alternatives.wcd 08/25/05 '2:59:25?M @ Haestad Methods, Inc. WSB &A.ssociates, Inc. 37 Brookside Re;d WaL:bury,-- 06708 USA WaterCAD v6.5 [6.5120f] .~1-203-755-1666 Page 1 C 'l 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 OFT 750 1500 - IJATER MAIN 1 1 1 PSI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W~B 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA EXISTING SYSTEM PEAK HOUR PRESSURE WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 763-541-4800 &: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI;l'\..'I:tll'U'J :~=-- -::II~[til~I:::ll:::ll:...~ -:l.~~~I~1 ::lI:...... FIGURE 3 1 - - '<t 0 I ~ CO 0 z to Lt') ~ :E 0 Q< d 0 ~ ~ '" '" ~ I- Z C W > I-- I-- (f) a:: () ::> ::> w C) '" t: J ::> i:i: 0 0 c::: <( a.. W CD I-- (f) <( 3: Cl >- t- :J Q:!~ w a:: CIlO ::> <(CIl ::!: CIl Ww CIl lLZ ~ W Z~ a:: CIl C- O::!: >- F CIl a:: u - '" ::> WCl zO z 0 zO F :J: 03= CIl ::!: U~ X ::> wO w ~ CIl:J: Z ,CIl ::!: w z M ~OIO g~ O~~ .,.~ cn.!1l) B ~.3Z ~CI)~ ~~ .;: .ti ~ IV 8- u. "" IV ~ CD c: C; c: ..... ~ ~ ~' ~~: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA EXISTING SYSTEM AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN vtss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 & Assoc:late.. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .I~I:I :'~\.'I:t'r"(lJ:~=----:II~[r1I~I~:II :...------:J..~'~]~I ::1l:...... FIGURE 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1A AND 1B WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 I 763-541-4800 &: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI:'~'-'I:t'l"IIJ :~=-- -:II~[ti I ~I::II:II::..~ -~.~~~I~I:II:"'''' I I OFT 750 1500 EXISTING 4' - EXISTING 6' - EXISTING 8' - EXISTING 12' - EXISTING 16' m_m__ FUTURE NEIJ PARCELS SERVED FIGURE 6 - - - .q- ~ 0 I z CO ::i! 0 ::E (0 ei 10 ~ ~ 0 l- e 0 4: I' :- C'J z w I- a:: l- (/) ::> ~ u :::l C> 0 W '-' G: J :::l 0 0:::: <( a... W CD l- (/) <( 3: Cl >- I- :J ~~ W (/)0 <( a:: <((/) ::> Ww (/) u..Z W (/) Z~ > w a:: O~ F a.. F <( o - Z a:: wO a:: ::> zO w 0 Z~ l- I ...J Ow <( ~ o a:: wO <( w (/)I a.. .........(/) W Z M =0<0 g~ 6g~ "t";" [/)$ 5i5i ~'5z ~cn~ "'''' aHa ........ .;: .ti ~ '" 15 "- '2 Co '" CD CD X c: 0 c: .... ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~Ii: - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ W~B 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1A WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 & Ae8ociotee. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .I~ I ill ~1.\..'I;ilI"IIJ .~=-- - :l~[t1I"I:ll;l....~ -~.~~"I"I ::Il.~"" MAXIMUM DAY PRESSURE I I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN FIGURE 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1A WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I 783-5414800 &: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1"liI.'~\"'I.{lI" "J.~ =-- -;I.. ltll..I..;l.......... -:il.~'..I..I;Jl.~.... MINIMUM HOUR PRESSURE I I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN FIGURE 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1A WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 ole _ales. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1 ~ I iI:h\""I:i'rll(lJ:~=-- -::II ~ (tll ~ 1::II::ll:......... -:il.~'~I~I::lI:....... AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW I I OFT 750 1500 - IJATER MAIN FIGURE 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1 B WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4600 ole _I... Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI:h\""I:U[""I:~=-'-::Il~(tll~I::Il::ll:"'~-:lllr:'~"I"I::II...... PEAK HOUR PRESSURE I I o FT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN FIGURE 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 1B AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW x OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 & Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI.hl..'l.illIlIlJ.~=-'-:Il"[fil"I::II::Il...~-:il.""I"I::l...... I FIGURE 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA AL TERNA TIVE 2A AND 2B vfsB 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 I 763-541-4800 &: AssocIates, Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1 ~I:I :l,\.o.tI:tlr.lIll :~=---:II ~Ifil~I::II::I:...------ :.I.~'~I ~ 1=1:...... I I OFT 750 1500 ----- EXISTING 4' - EXISTING 6' - EXISTING 8' - EXISTING 12' - EXISTING 16' nm_m FUTURE NEIJ PARCELS SERVED WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 FIGURE 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 2A WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 &: Anoelotee. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~I:I:l.\."t l:ilIlIlIl :~=-- -=m~I~I::II::Il :...~ --:.I".;.'~I~I::II :...... PEAK HOUR PRESSURE I I OFT 750 1500 - IJATER MAIN FIGURE 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 2A MAXIMUM DAY PRESSURE I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 &: Associates, Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .I~I:I :B~"'tI:Urll"I:~=---::II ~r~I~I::II ::Il:...--- --:.I..;.'~I~ I ::ll:...... I FIGURE 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA ALTERNATIVE 2A MINIMUM HOUR PRESSURE I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN vlss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 '" _, Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 ., ~l:1:1.,-..tI:Ur"lIl :~=----:::l~ (tll ~ 1::II::Il:........ -:.I.]~I~I::Il:..... FIGURE 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA AL TERN A TIVE 2A AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 I 763-541-4800 Ie Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~1::I:l''"'''''tI:~I[.UIJ:~ =-- -:Il~[fH~I::II :::I:........-:.l..'~ ~1~1::ll :...~ I I o FT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 FIGURE 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA AL TERNA TlVE 2B vlss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 ~ PEAK HOUR PRESSURE I 763-541-4800 Ie Associates, Inc. FAX 763.541-1700 .1\'I:I:l,\,,"'tI:n[IIIII:~=-- -:Il~[tll~I:Il:ll:...-'-'--:.l'>~ ~1~I:Il :...... I I OFT 1500 750 - ....ATER MAIN WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 FIGURE 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA AL TERNA TIVE 2B vtss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 ~ AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW I o FT 750 1500 - \lATER MAIN WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 & Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1 ~I:I:B.."'tI:urll"J :~=----:ll~[tila:'I:Il:ll:..~ -:l.~' ~I~ I ::Il:...... I FIGURE 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2A AND 2B w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 I 763-541-4800 a: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~1::I:H...'I:urlt"J:4=----:l~(t:lI~I:Il:ll:"'---:l."~I~I:ll:...... I ;( OFT 71lO 1500 - EXISTING 4' - EXISTING 6' - EXISTING 8' - EXISTING 12' - EXISTING 16' mmm FUTURE NEV PARCELS SERVED WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 FIGURE 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 763-541-4800 " Assoclatoa, Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI :1.;.".'I:Ur....I:~=-- --:Il~[t:lI~I01:1l:..---:.IIJ..'~I~I:I:...... ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2A PEAK HOUR PRESSURE I OFT 750 1500 - IJATER MAIN vf$B 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I FIGURE 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2A MAXIMUM DAY PRESSURE I o FT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN vf$s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 a: Associates. Inc. FAX. 763-541 ~ 1700 .1~I.I.l''-'I.ur''''I.~=---::Il ~Itll~I::I:Il....------:.I".;.'~I"I:ll:...... I FIGURE 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 763-541-4800 &: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1"liI:l~\.'I:ilr"lIm=---::Il..[t1I"[:::I::Il:...---:lIr:'H'I"I:ll:...... ~ NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - AL TERNA TlVE 2A MINIMUM HOUR PRESSURE I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DA TE: AUGUST 2005 I FIGURE 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW W~B 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2A WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 II: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1"liI:"\..'I:~.r"lIm=-'-:Il..[tll"I:Il:ll:...---:.Ir~~"I"I::Il:...... I I OFT 750 1500 - VATER MAIN FIGURE 24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PEAK HOUR PRESSURE vfss 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2B WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 I 763-541-4800 " Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1~liI.l,;,\o.'I:tll""I:~--:II..[ttl"I:II:ll:"'----:IIlr:""I"I:lI:...... I I OFT 1500 750 - IJATER MAIN FIGURE 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW w~s 701 Xenia Aveune South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 NE/SE CONNECTION FEASIBILITY SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PHASE 1 - ALTERNATIVE 2B I 763-541-4800 a: Associates. Inc. FAX 763-541-1700 .1"1::I:l'~'I:~'1'IlIJ:~--:l"ltll"1:ll:ll:,,~"':.Ir,;,'''I''I:I:...... I I OFT 1500 750 - IJATER MAIN WSB PROJECT NO. 1608-04 DATE: AUGUST 2005 FIGURE 26 I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B I OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS I I I I I I I I I Feasibility Report City of Shorewood Connection of the Southeast Area Water System to the Northeast Area Water System WSB Project No. 1608-04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 6 Alternative 1A - 8" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via St. Albans Bay Rd. and Manor Rd Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter UN FT 155 $4.00 $620.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 9,000 $8.50 $76,500.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 4,800 $6.00 $28,800.00 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 700 $15.00 $10,500.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 3500 $20.00 $70,000.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 900 $60.00 $54,000.00 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 900 $60.00 $54,000.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 400 $5.00 $2,000.00 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 UN FT 150 $9.00 $1,350.00 11 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $342,270.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 51 $75.00 $3,825.00 13 8" Gate Valve and Box EACH 5 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 14 Curb Stop & Box EACH 51 $250.00 $12,750.00 15 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Hydrant Assembly EACH 10 $3,000.00 $30,000.00 17 1" Type K Copper Pipe UN FT 800 $20.00 $16,000.00 18 8" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 4765 $35.00 $166,775.00 19 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 2400 $4.00 $9,600.00 20 Dewatering UN FT 4765 $15.00 $71,475.00 21 Sodding, Type Lawn (Inc!. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 600 $3.50 $2,100.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $320,525.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $662,795.00 Contingencies (25%) $165,698.75 Total Estimated Construction Cost $828,493.75 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $207,123.44 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,035,617.19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 7 Alternative 1B -12" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via St. Albans Bay Rd. and Manor Rd Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter UN FT 155 $4.00 $620.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 9,000 $8.50 $76,500.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 4,800 $6.00 $28,800.00 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 700 $15.00 $10,500.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 3500 $20.00 $70,000.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 900 $60.00 $54,000.00 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 900 $60.00 $54,000.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 400 $5.00 $2,000.00 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 UN FT 150 $9.00 $1,350.00 11 Traffic Control . LUMP SUM 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $348,270.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 51 $75.00 $3,825.00 13 12" Gate Valve and Box EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 14 Curb Stop & Box EACH 51 $250.00 $12,750.00 15 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Hydrant Assembly EACH 10 $3,000.00 $30,000.00 17 1" Type K Copper Pipe UN FT 800 $20.00 $16,000.00 18 12" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 4765 $50.00 $238,250.00 19 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 4765 $4.00 $19,060.00 20 Dewatering UN FT 4765 $15.00 $71,475.00 21 Sodding, Type Lawn (Inc!. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 600 $3.50 $2,100.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $405,460.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $753,730.00 Contingencies (25%) $188,432.50 Total Estimated Construction Cost $942,162.50 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $235,540.63 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,177,703.13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 8 Alternative 2A - 8" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via Manor Rd only, with Additional 8" Watermain Along St. Albans Bay Road Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter UN FT 155 $4.00 $620.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 9,800 $8.50 $83,300.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 5,900 $6.00 $35,400.00 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 810 $15.00 $12,150.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 4025 $20.00 $80,500.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 1,020 $60.00 $61,200.00 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 1,020 $60.00 $61,200.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 485 $5.00 $2,425.00 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 UN FT 150 $9.00 $1,350.00 11 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $383,145.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 51 $75.00 $3,825.00 13 8" Gate Valve and Box EACH 6 $1,200.00 $7,200.00 14 Curb Stop & Box EACH 51 $250.00 $12,750.00 15 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Hydrant Assembly EACH 12 $3,000.00 $36,000.00 17 1" Type K Copper Pipe UN FT 800 $20.00 $16,000.00 18 8" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 5825 $35.00 $203,875.00 19 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 2915 $4.00 $11,660.00 20 Dewatering UN FT 5825 $15.00 $87,375.00 21 Sodding, Type Lawn (Incl. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 600 $3.50 $2,100.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $382,785.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $765,930.00 Contingencies (25%) $191,482.50 Total Estimated Construction Cost $957,412.50 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $239,353.13 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,196,765.63 I I Table 9 I Alternative 2B -12" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via Manor Rd only, with Additional 8" Watermaln along St. Albans Bay Road Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost I I Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter L1N FT 155 $4.00 $620.00 I 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 9,800 $8.50 $83,300.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LI N FT 5,900 $6.00 $35,400.00 I 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 810 $15.00 $12,150.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 4025 $20.00 $80,500.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 1,020 $60.00 $61,200.00 I 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 1,020 $60.00 $61,200.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 485 $5.00 $2,425.00 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 LI N FT 150 $9.00 $1,350.00 I 11 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $389,145.00 I Schedule B - Watermaln Improvements I 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 51 $75.00 $3,825.00 13 12" Gate Valve and Box EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 I 14 8" Gate Valve and Box EACH 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 15 Curb Stop & Box EACH 51 $250.00 $12,750.00 16 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 I 17 Hydrant Assembly EACH 12 $3,000.00 $36,000.00 18 1" Type K Copper Pipe L1N FT 800 $20.00 $16,000.00 19 12" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap L1N FT 5825 $50.00 $291,250.00 I 20 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 5825 $4.00 $23,300.00 21 Dewatering L1N FT 5825 $15.00 $87,375.00 22 Sodding, Type Lawn (Incl. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 600 $3.50 $2,100.00 I Total Schedule B - Watermaln Improvements $485,800.00 I Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $874,945.00 Contingencies (25%) $218,736.25 I Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,093,681.25 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $273,420.31 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,367,101.56 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 10 8" Watermaln along Eastern Municipal Boundary Line from Excelsior Blvd to Vine Street Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 1,600 $8.50 $13,600.00 3 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 1,450 $6.00 $8,700.00 4 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 135 $15.00 $2,025.00 5 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 6 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 175 $60.00 $10,500.00 7 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 175 $60.00 $10,500.00 8 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 80 $5.00 $400.00 Seeding (Incl Topsoil, Fert, Mulch, Disc 9 Anchor ACRE 0.50 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 10 Erosion Control Blankets Category 2 SQYD 100 $4.50 $450.00 11 Seed Mixture 250 POUND 21 $6.00 $126.00 12 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $74,301.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 13 8" Gate Valve and Box EACH 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 14 Connect to Existing Watermain (8") EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 15 Hydrant Assembly EACH 4 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 16 8" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 2045 $35.00 $71,575.00 17 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 1025 $4.00 $4, 100.00 18 Dewatering UN FT 2045 $15.00 $30,675.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $123,450.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $197,751.00 Contingencies (25%) $29,662.65 Total Estimated Construction Cost $227,413.65 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $56,853.41 Total Estimated Project Cost $284,267.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 11 Phase I - Alternative 2A - 8" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via Manor Rd only Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter UN FT 110 $4.00 $440.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 4,200 $8.50 $35,700.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 2,550 $6.00 $15,300.00 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 350 $15.00 $5,250.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 1725 $20.00 $34,500.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 450 $60.00 $27,000.00 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 450 $60.00 $27,000.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 210 $5.00 $1,050.00 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 UN FT 110 $9.00 $990.00 11 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $172,230.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 18 $75.00 $1,350.00 13 8" Gate Valve and Box EACH 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 14 Curb Stop & Box EACH 18 $250.00 $4,500.00 15 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Hydrant Assembly EACH 5 $3,000.00 $15,000.00 17 1" Type K Copper Pipe UN FT 300 $20.00 $6,000.00 18 8" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 2484 $35.00 $86,940.00 19 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 1300 $4.00 $5,200.00 20 Dewatering UN FT 2484 $15.00 $37,260.00 21 Sodding, Type Lawn (Incl. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 200 $3.50 $700.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $162,550.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $334,780.00 Contingencies (25%) $83,695.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $418,475.00 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $104,618.75 Total Estimated Project Cost $523,093.75 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 12 Phase 1- Alternative 2B -12" Watermain for Service to Existing Homes and NE/SE connection via Manor Rd only Engineer's Opinion of Total Probable Project Cost Schedule A - Surface Improvements 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 2 Remove Curb and Gutter UN FT 110 $4.00 $440.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SQYD 4,200 $8.50 $35,700.00 4 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) UN FT 2,550 $6.00 $15,300.00 5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CUYD 350 $15.00 $5,250.00 6 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON 1725 $20.00 $34,500.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TON 450 $60.00 $27,000.00 8 Type 31 Base Course Mixture TON 450 $60.00 $27,000.00 9 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat GALLON 210 $5.00 $1,050.00 "10 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 UN FT 110 $9.00 $990.00 11 Traffic Control LUMP SUM 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Total Schedule A - Surface Improvements $175,230.00 Schedule B - Watermain Improvements 12 1" Corporation Stop EACH 18 $75.00 $1,350.00 13 12" Gate Valve and Box EACH 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 14 Curb Stop & Box EACH 18 $250.00 $4,500.00 15 Connect to Existing Watermain (12") EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Hydrant Assembly EACH 5 $3,000.00 $15,000.00 17 1" Type K Copper Pipe UN FT 300 $20.00 $6,000.00 18 12" Water Main, DIP., CL 52 W/Polywrap UN FT 2484 $50.00 $124,200.00 19 Ductile Iron Fittings POUND 2484 $4.00 $9,936.00 20 Dewatering UN FT 2484 $15.00 $37,260.00 21 Sodding, Type Lawn (Incl. Topsoil & Fert) SQYD 200 $3.50 $700.00 Total Schedule B - Watermain Improvements $206,946.00 Subtotal (Schedule A - B) $382,176.00 Contingencies (25%) $95,544.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $477,720.00 Engineering, Administration, and Legal Fees (25%) $119,430.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $597,150.00