Loading...
071105 CC Reg AgP .. (if . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ~O~AY,JlTILYll,2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.~. AGE~A 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love_ Lizee Turgeon _ Callies Wellens B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF:MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, June 27, 2005 (Att.- Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGE~A - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.- Claims List) B. Staffing - No action required C. Acceptance of Proposal for Safe Assure Consultants (Att. - Public Works Director's memorandum.) D. Sign Permit Approval (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum.) Applicant: Oasis MarketIMarathon Gas Location: 24365 Smithtown Road (Co. Rd. 19) 4. ~TTERS FRO~ THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. REPORTS ~ PRESENTATIONS 6. PUBLIC HEARING 7. PARKS 8. PLANNING - Report by Representative II . , ~- . CITY COUNCIL AGE~A - JlTIL Y 11, 2005 PAGE20F2 9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. SLMPD Issues Group Recommendation (Art. - Administrator's memorandum.) 10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Accept Feasibility Report and Authorize Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Engineering Estimate, and Request for Proposals (Att. - Public Works Director's memorandum, WSB memorandum, Resolution) 11. STAFF ~ COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff . 1. County Road 19 Intersection B. Mayor & City Council 12. ADJOURN . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927- (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us - Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 11 July 2005 Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval. . Agenda Item #3B: Staffing - no action required. Agenda Item #3C: The Occupational Safety and Health Associatiori. (OSHA) mandates safety training for all employees. Public Works Personnel are also required to be certified in ten specific areas of safety. . Safe Assure Inc. has provided these services as a joint project with 11 other lake area communities. The ability to train with other municipalities proVIdes the opportunity to train at a fraction of the cost of providing training separatel)'. Staff is recommending acceptance of the proposal by Safe Assure for these services. . Agenda Item #3D: Identi-Graphics has applied for sign permits to change the.signage at the Oasis Market and (now) Marathon Gas, located atthe southeast comer of Smith town Road and Country Club Road. The request includes mOI:~ signs than what the Zoning Code allows. Staff has recommended approval of the ones that are consistent with the Code and denial ofthose in excess. It should be noted thaUhe sign company has begun work without the necessary permit. Approval of the new signs should be contingent on the applicant correcting those in violation. - Agenda Item #9A: On JllIle 27, the City Council approved the recommendation ofthe. SLMPD Issues Group, and statedthat its approval was valid through midnight June 30. Councilmember Wellens is requesting that the Council consider a formal revocation of its approval. ~ Agenda Item #10A: The City Council may recall that Mr. Mike Catain, resident on Shady Island has petitioned the City to re1oc8;te/extend a dry hydrant located on his property. . WSB and Associates have prepared a feasibility memorandum declaring that the project petitioned is feasible. Costs for such are to be assessed back to the property, if the project moves forward. >. Due to the timing of the technic;al memorandum, and a watermain break, Staffwill forward a cover memorandum under separate cover for this item. #" '-~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ~ . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 27,2005 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MINUTES DR FT 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Callies, Lizee, Turgeon, and Wellens; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane (arrived 7:05 P.M.); and Engineer Brown Absent: Finance Director Burton and Planning Director Nielsen B. Review Agenda Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda for the meeting. Administrator Dawson requested Item 9B, Discussion on a Date for a Work Session on the Excelsior Fire District Budget, be added to the Agenda for the evening. He also noted a zoning appeal from the Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club would be on the Agenda for the July 11,2005, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda, and apologized for any inconvenience this may have caused anyone. Lizee moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, June 13, 2005 Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2005, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. B. City Council Work Session Minutes, June 13, 2005 Lizee moved, Wellens seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2005, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Love reviewed the Consent Agenda. Regarding Item 3E, Jeffrey Watson, attorney for the Raisbecks, clarified the square footage listed in Paragraph 3, in the draft resolution, to be 1948 square feet, rather than 13 96 square feet. Administrator Dawson agreed, and also noted, with regard to Item 3F, in Paragraph 1, the plat should be known as Parkview in the draft resolution rather than Arbor Creek. Lizee moved, Callies seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein: j~ _'J ^ ~....,\ /1 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27, 2005 Page 2 of7 A. Approval of the Verified Claims List B. Staffing - No action required C. Approving a Sign Permit for Edward Jones, 23480 State Highway 7 (Shorewood Village Shopping Center) D. Approving a Sign Permit for Oasis Market, 24365 Smithtown Road E. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-056, "A Resolution Approving Subdivision and Combination of Real Property for David and Ellen Raisbeck, 26440 Edgewood Road," and Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-057, "A Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit for Additional Accessory Space to David and Ellen Raisbeck, 25440 Edgewood Road." F. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-058, "A Resolution Approving the Revised Final Plat of Barrington Second Addition for Capestone Builders, Excelsior Boulevard." G. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-059, "A Resolution Granting a Preliminary Plat Approval for Parkview, Bridgeland Development Co., 5025/5045/5055/5075 Suburban Drive." H. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-060, "A Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Badger Well House Improvement Project, City Project 98-06." I. Accepting a proposal for Engineering Services KLM Engineering, Inc for SE Area Water Tower Rehabilitation J. Accepting a proposal for Engineering Services Instrument Control Systems, Inc. K. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 05-061, "A Resolution Accepting the 2004 Bituminous Overlay Project, City Project 04-06." L. Accepting a proposal for Engineering Service WSB and Associates, SE Well for Amesbury Well Interconnection M. Approving an Extension of Deadline for Notice to Remove for Steve and Barb Swanson, 5755 Echo Road Motion passed 5/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no matters from the floor presented this evening. . . . . . . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27, 2005 Page 3 of7 5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Community Rec. Resources 2005 First and Second Quarter Report Engineer Brown reported the City's Park Coordinator service, Community Rec. Resources, had submitted a quarterly report for Council review, noting the document presented information clearly, and questioned whether Council had any questions. He noted Sally Keefe, principal of Community Rec. Resources, was present also to answer any questions from Council. Councilmember Turgeon thanked the Staff at Community Rec. Resources for providing this service for the past two years and addressing several problems for City Staff. She also thanked the firm for working within the schedule to welcome additional user groups to the City's park system. Ms. Keefe thanked the Council for its continued support in the role of Park Coordinator and noted the City's Park Equity Policy helped to streamline process issues and provide clarity for park users. 6. PUBLIC HEARING None. 7. PARKS Engineer Brown reported there would be a meeting of the Park Commission on Tuesday, June 28, 2005, and thus, he had nothing to report on at this time. 8. PLANNING Commissioner White stated there had not been a meeting of the Planning Commission since the most recent Regular Council meeting; thus, she had nothing to report on at this time. 9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS A. SLMPD Issues Group recommendations Administrator Dawson explained the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) Issues Group began its meetings during the first week of March 2005. The Issues Group worked through the process agreed upon by all member cities' councils to be completed by May 31,2005. Over the course of eight meetings, the Group finished its work on May 26, 2005. Administrator Dawson explained that at the beginning of the process, the Group agreed that all of its recommendations would be interdependent in one package. At the conclusion of its process, the Group agreed that the members' city councils would need to act on this package by June 30, 2005. This action was necessary for the 2006 budget process and to expedite the preparation of amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement (JP A). Administrator Dawson also stated communications had been received from the City of Excelsior regarding a request for continued discussions associated with Issues Group matters that were not fully discussed or addressed. He noted the City of Excelsior communications included a description actions at its special meeting of June 25, talking points for further discussion, a summary presentation and minutes of the last Issues Group meeting and process, as well as a report by a consultant hired by the City of Excelsior to analyze alternatives for future policing for that city. Administrator Dawson also went on to summarize the elements of the Issues Group recommendations, financial implications for the City of CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27, 2005 Page 4 of7 Shorewood, and alternatives for the future with regard to public safety. He also noted the representatives . to the Issues Group from the other member cities were present this evening. Councilmember Lizee stated she would like to expedite the process this evening. Lizee moved, Callies seconded, Accepting and Approving the SLMPD Issues Group Recommendations, which included increasing Shorewood's portion of the financial funding formula for the police operating budget to 49%, with the stipulation that this offer expires on June 30, 2005, at 12:00 midnight and that the City Attorney begin to examine options for dissolution of the Joint Powers Agreement if all four cities have not approved the recommendations by that time. Councilmember Wellens stated he was disappointed to have received the communications from Excelsior just prior to the meeting. He stated he would speak in opposition to the motion as he had not seen any evidence presented throughout the Issues Group process to show financial hardship by Excelsior. He stated in reviewing the meeting ofthe Issues Group, the City of Excelsior's representatives implied that the City of Shore wood had unjustly and unfairly treated the residents of the City of Excelsior with regard to lack of support for the financial formula option presented by Excelsior representatives. He was upset by this implication and noted he had seen many political reactions from the City of Excelsior that appeared "anti-business" in recent years with regard to increasing its tax base. He also stated he did not see the wisdom in these decisions, nor did he see the need for the problems created as a result of this poor planning to be spread to Shorewood residents. Councilmember Wellens went on to state he thought the City of Excelsior was only beginning to see the implications of its actions and would most likely see more in the future as result. Councilmember Callies stated she was in favor of approving the tentative agreements with the increased funding in the formula for Shorewood because all city councils had engaged in the additional work to meet the deadlines associated with the process. She further stated she did not think another deadline in the process, so that talks could continue, would be of any assistance at this point in time. She agreed with Issues Group representatives that a compromise had been reached, but she thought there would likely be no more. She stated the JP A was a partnership and should it not work the City of Shorewood should begin to examine other alternatives. Councilmember Lizee stated she had placed the June 30, 2005, deadline in the motion because she would not support the tentative agreement recommendations with another extension involved. Councilmember Lizee stated it was important for everyone to understand that good faith efforts had been made in the past by the City of Shorewood and would be until June 30, 2005, to bring resolution to this situation. Councilmember Turgeon agreed with the purpose of the June 30 deadline in the motion on the table. Three member cities had extended compromises to the City of Excelsior in the Issues Group process to no avail. The City of Excelsior had reports that demonstrated policing alternatives to the SLMPD were cost prohibitive, and the request for information was to continue the time to demonstrate otherwise. She stated she would support additional meetings for resolution of the remaining issues from the Issues Group process; however, Excelsior would need to approve the tentative agreements prior to the June 30, 2005, deadline as outlined in the beginning of the resolution process. She stated Excelsior had demanded 35% of the policing services while only wanting to pay for 22.5%. Should the City of Excelsior wish to lessen thede:q:1and it created, the amount paid would certainly follow. She stated the City of Excelsior wanted the amenities in its city and needed to pay for those amenities. If that could not be maintained, she suggested reevaluating the kinds of businesses allowed in that city. . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27, 2005 Page 5 of7 . Mayor Love stated agreement was not a measurement of listening. A process had been followed, perhaps abbreviated, but was abbreviated for all parties involved in the resolution process. Concerns from all representatives and all cities had been heard in that process, and he had sadly realized the member cities were not one community in spirit any longer. He stated should the City of Excelsior's representatives believe the funding formula allowed for the subsidization of Shorewood, then dissolution seemed the best alternative. He went on to state all member cities had entered into negotiations at the request of Excelsior and followed a process and timeline approved by the City of Excelsior's representatives. He stated the consequences of the outcome of this process would be felt for a long time to come. He supported the motion only because it would be an effort to help stabilize costs for all member cities for future planning and public safety. . . Mayor Love noted the mayors of Excelsior, Greenwood, and Tonka Bay were all present this evening, and invited them to speak on this issue. Mayor Nick Ruehl of Excelsior stated he was not prepared this evening to make a speech; however, as he had listened this evening it was obvious that representatives of each city present had a different view of the situation, which was unfortunate. He stated the member cities were policed as one, and he would like to see the JP A be representative of one community. However, he had learned in the process that demand was only one of several factors that should affect funding the operating budget. He noted historic trends in the City of Excelsior, and stated the alternative funding formula presented was not about current financial crises, but good financial planning. He further stated data that would have more aptly explained this viewpoint was not allowed to be heard as part of the resolution process. He also believed that Shorewood's representatives stating 49% as a maximum contribution preempted a great deal of fruitful discussion of funding factors and related data. Mayor Ruehl stated he did not believe Excelsior's representatives wanted to dissolve the JP A; however, the cities should look within the JP A to accommodate services. He requested the Council consider the whole of the situation and the future options for all. Mayor Love stated Shorewood had offered to provide the biggest financial efforts to move the process forward of all member cities. While availability of services was a factor, it was based on past demand. . Councilmember Turgeon thanked the representatives of Greenwood and Tonka Bay for the effort to provide a 1 % increase in the resolution process as the operating budget represented significant portions of their city budgets currently. Further, she noted, the City ofTonka Bay had always been willing to provide contributions that far exceeded their demand for the sake of policing as one community. She stated it was her understanding in the tentative agreement at the Issues Group's fmal meeting that Shorewood's 49% contribution would be phased in; however, that was not the case at this point in time either. She noted all member cities did not get what each wanted, but she believed that if the City of Excelsior would accept the tentative agreements; all remaining issues would be resolved easily. . Councilmember Callies questioned whether the abbreviated process discussed earlier in this meeting held any implications for resolution. Mayor Love stated there were several times in the process that people wished to expound on points of discussion; however, it was the duty of the facilitator to bring the process to end by the predetermined deadline. He stated he believed all representatives in the Issues Group had listened to all other representatives in good faith. Mayor Love called for a roll call vote. Motion passed 4/1, with Wellens dissenting. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27, 2005 Page 6 of7 . B. A Discussion on a Work Session for the Excelsior Fire District Budget Administrator Dawson stated the process for consideration of the EFD Operating Budget had undergone revision this year. As a result, it was recommended by Staff that Council hold a Work Session meeting on the budget in July of this year. Staff suggested this meeting be held on Monday, July 18,2005, at 7:00 P.M. Council agreed. 10. ENGINEERlNGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Reject Bids for Timber Lane Water Project Engineer Brown explained bids had been received and opened for the Timber Lane Water Project that had been petitioned by area residents. He stated the bids were 43% higher than the anticipated engineering estimate for this project. For that reason, Staff was recommending the bids for the project be rejected at this time. He went on to explain the wet weather and competitive bidding climate in the marketplace contributed to the high bids. He anticipated the project might have more reasonable bids when bid with another project or when bid later in the fall of this year. . Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Rejecting the Bids for the Timber Lane Water Project. Motion passed 5/0. . 11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. County Road 19 Intersection Engineer Brown stated the progress on County Road 19 was moving along appropriately. The City had . heard recently from several residents regarding the anticipated time line for completion of the current phase of the project. To better illustrate the difficult and complex working conditions the crews currently had to deal with as part of this phase, Engineer Brown shared several recent photographs showing the trench sites for the project. He noted the timing of burying the utilities was proving particularly challenging; however, he was hopeful the utility companies could complete the necessary service work by July 1,2005, if the weather permitted. He stated once this phase of the project was complete, he anticipated residents could more readily view the progress being made in the project. B. Mayor & City Council Mayor Love reported there would be a meeting of the Coordinating Committee in late July, and he requested a work session be held, if necessary, to help determine a course of action for the City of Shorewood with regard to the police issues currently unresolved. Engineer Brown provided clarification for a questions asked by Councilmember Callies regarding several . anticipated sealcoating projects within the City. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 27,2005 Page 7 of7 . Councilmember Callies also noted there was a meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission on June 28, 2005, on the topic of wireless internet options should any other councilmember wish to attend in her absence. . . . . 12. ADJOURN Turgeon moved, Wellens seconded, Adjourning the June 27, 2005, Regular City Council Meeting at 7:55 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary Woody Love, Mayor Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator . PAYABLESAPPROVALS For 7/11/05 Council Meeting . ~~~ Prepared by: Catheine E~e, s.n A.C c~coouumnt. ant Reviewed by: ~ ~ Bonnie Burton, Fin~~ Director ,~,/-- // J . Approved by: Crai . . Date: 7- 7-05 Date: 1 f, k Date: ff/ 1J7~ =If .3 f} . . . . . PAYROLL APPROVALS For 7/11/05 Council Meeting ~ Prepared by: Catherine E~ke, Ejf. Accountant Reviewed by: ~ ~ Bonnie Burton, ~inan<(e Director ,/ .. ;" //.. ., '1-1 / /// , Date: 1-7-05 Date: 1) /6' Date:07.f/J7.!J5. . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD . 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: . July 7,2005 RE: Authorization to Enter Into a Contract With Safe Assure Consultants The Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) mandates safety training for all employees. Each year employees must be certified in the following items. . Employee Right to Know . Blood Borne Pathogens . Emergency Action Plan Beyond this training, Public Works Personnel are also to be certified annually in the following areas: . AWAIR . Confined Space Entry/Rescue . Personal Protective Equipment . Trench Safety . Forklift/Skidsteer Certification . Equipment LockoutlTagout . Hearing Conservation . Respirators . Chainsaw Operations . Defensive Driving Safe Assure Inc. has provided these services as a joint project with 11 other lake area communities. The ability to train with other municipalities provides the opportunity to train at a cost of approximately one tenth the cost of other programs. This year, Safe Assure is also providing an option for an automated Material Data Safety Sheet program. OSHA mandates that every material that an employee comes in contact with must have a Material Data Safety Sheet (MSDS) that outlines health risks, protective equipment to be utilized, and chemical reaction data. Attachment 1 is a sample of an MSDS sheet. This mandate, not only applies to chemicals, but to ev~ryday items such as bolts, wood, and asphalt. The job of keeping MSDS sheets current for every product that is received is an ominous task, at best. n ~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER :#=-3C, l~",c;IVvW "'.""," ,............ ......--------, Date: Snl01 Time: I?ages: 18 Duration: Sender: 952 930 1929 Company: Fax tJ..............., ...................................................... .............................. !:!....hl.eu,.:t.................. ................................................ . .MAR-07-2001 WED 08: 18 AM ADVANCED IMAGING FAX NO. 952 930 1929 P. 14..._ 8:12 AM 10 min 47 sec - MINOITA Products Name: PHOTO CONDUCTOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET page:1/5 MSDS No.: DPO-0239 Issue Date: 6 March 2001 . 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product Name: PHOTOCONDUCTOR used for: DDC52, DDC62, DDP62 Supplier Identification: Minolta Co., Ltd. 3-13, 2-Chome, Azuchi-Machi, Chuo-Ku, Osaka 541-8556 JAPAN Telephone: +81-6-6271-2251 Facsimile: +81-6-6266-1010 Contact Point: Minolta CO., Ltd. (Quality &: Ecology Division) 2-30, Toyotsu-Cho, SUita-Shi, Osaka 564-0051 Japan Facsimile: +61-6-6366-6254 2. COMPOSITION I INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS Hazardous Ingredients: None present . . Major Ingredients: [Generic Name] Substrate Aluminum d.rlltn Coating layer Binder resin Photosensitive material Pigment [CAS No.] [%] >97 +++ <: 3 +++ +++ +++ +++: Supplier's confidential information . 14 Attachment # 1 it:::\,Pt;:IVC;U ...."'.... \....""... ~--------I Date: 3/:7-1J;)1---._.. ....... ...........---...... .......Iime:._____8:12.AM Pages: 18 Duration: 10 min 47 sec Sender: 952 930 1929 Company: Fax ".............",....................................................................................... !:!u.....Lov:o:t.. ...... .................. ............ .... ..... . Typ . i'lAR-07 -2001 WED 08: 17 AM ADVANCED I MI\G I NG FAX NO. 952 930 1929 . . P.. K.... - . MINOITA Products Name: PHOTOCONDUCTOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET page: 2/5 MSDS No.: DPO-0239 Issue Date: 6 March 2001 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Most Important Hazards For Human Health: For the Environment: For Others: Specific Hazards: and Effects of the Products No symptoms expected with intended use. No data are available on the adverse effects of this product on the environment. None None 4. FIRST-AID MEASURES Symptoms of OVerexposure:No symptoms expected with intended use. Routes of Entry: None Information Inhalation: No treatment is required. Skin Contact: No treatment is required. Eye Contact: No treatment is required. Ingestion: No treatment is required. Note to Physician: None . 5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES Suitable Extinguishing Media: Extinguishing Media to Avoid: Special Firefighting Procedures: Fire and Explosion Hazards: . Protection of Firefighters: C02, water, foam and dry chemical None None This material has no unusual fire or explosive hazards. No special equipment is required. 6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES personal Precautions: Environmental Precautions: Methods for Cleaning Up: 7. HANDLING AND STORAGE Handling Technical Measures: None Precautions: This product will be scorched in the case of fire. Safe Handling Advice: None. Not applicable with intended use. Not applicable with intended use. Not applicable with intended use. . Storage Technical Measures: None Storage conditions: Keep and Store in a cool and dry place. Incompatible products:None packing Materials: Cardboard box designated by Minolta. . 15 ~",g..1;;j'W ..."".... \....-.... ---------/ J.ate: 3/:JJJJj _________Time:---- :)~ges: 18 Duration: 3ender: 952 930 1929 Company: Fax t..I",.,.h,or.,. ..................................................................................... C!........Lov...... . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. - . . . MAR-07 -200 1 WED 08: 17 Al1 ADVANCEO Il1AG I NG FAX NO. 952 930 1929.. .p,.1 ii U U._ 8'1.2.AM._ 10 min 47 see -- MINOITA Products Name: PHOTOCONDUCTOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Page:3/S MSDS No.: DPO-0239 Date: 6 March 2001 Issue 8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS I PERSONAL PROTECTION Engineering Measures ventilation: None required with intended use. . Control Parameters OSHA-PEL (USA): Not Applicable DFG-MAl< (EC) : Not Applicable Personal Protective Equipment None required when used as intended in Minolta ACGIH-TLV (USA) : Not Applicable Worksafe-TWA(Austl) : Not Applicable equipment. . Hygiene Measures: Wash hands after ?andling. 9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Appearance Physical State: Solid Form: Cylinder Odor: Odorless <<Results of the coated compounds on the aluminum substrate.>> Boiling Point: Not applicable Melting/Softening Point: No data available Flash Point: Not applicable pH: Not applicable Explosion Properties: Not applicable Density(g/cm3): 2.7 Solubility in water: insoluble Flammability: Not applicable Oxidizing Properties: No data available Ignition Temperature (OC) : No data available Vapor Pressure: Not applicable Partition Coefficient, n-Octanol/Water: Not applicable *= Based on data for other Minolta Products with similar ingredients) Color: Green . 1 O. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY Stability: Stable [ X ] Unstable [ Hazardous Reactions: None conditions to avoid: None Materials to Avoid: None Hazardous Decomposition Products: CO, C02 . 16 e::",c;IVG'\oI ...v~.... \...."".... '-1""''''''''''''''''_''''_1 .....8:t2AM 10 min 47 see late: 3{:l./.Q~-m.._.--.---T-ime:. )ages: 18 Duration: Sender: 952 930 1929 Company: =ax t..I,..,.,.~,........... ............................... ............ .............. .....-......... ....~....b;..,..,.t......... ... ........................ ............ r. MAR-07-2001 WED 08: 18 AM ADVANCED IMAGING FAX NO. 952 930 1929 ......p.....!?""............... ~: ~ - MINOITA Products Name: PHOTOCONDUCTOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET page:4/5 MSDS No.: DPO-0239 Issue Date: 6 March 200~ 11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION Health Effects from Exposure: No symptoms expected with intended use. Toxicological Data <<Result of the coated compounds on the aluminum substrate.>> Acute Toxicity: Inhalation, LCSO (mg/l) : Not applicable Ingestion(oral), LDSO(mg/kg): >2000 (Rats) Dermal, LDSO (mg/kg) : Not applicable Eye irritation: Very slight irritation (Rabbits) Skin irritation: Non irritant (Rabbits) Skin sensitizer: No data available Mutagenicity: Negative (AMES test) (*= Based on data for other Minoltaproducts with similar ingredients) Local Effects: No data available Chronic Toxicity or Long Term Toxicity: None Carcinogenicity !ARC Monographs: Not listed NTP (USA) : Not listed OSHA Regulated(USA): Not listed 12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION No data are available on the adverse effects of this material on the environment. . . 13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATION Appropriate Methods of Disposal Waste may be disposed or incinerated under conditions which meet all federal, state and local enviroIUnental regulations. . 14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION Special Precautions: None Information on Code and Classifications According to International Regulations UN Classification: None . 17 l...."''''..~'-'I ....-.... \----_. ---------, . 8: 12 AM 10 min 47 sec e MINOOA Products Name: PHOTOCONDUCTOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Page:S/5 MSDS No.: DPO-0239 Date: 6 March 2001 Issue . 15. REGULATORY INFORMATION US Information Information on the label: Not required SARA(Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act) Title III 302 Extreme Hazardous Substance: None 311/312 Hazard Categories: None 313 Reportable Ingredients: None California Proposition 65: This product contains no chemical substances subject to California proposition 6S. EU Information Information on the label (88/379/EEC and 67/548/EEC): Symbol & Indication: Not required R-Phrase: Not required S-Phrase: Not required 16. OTHER INFORMATION NFPA Hazard Rating: The National Fire Protection Agency (USA) : Health: 0 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0 HMIS RATING: The National Paint and Coating Association(USA) : Health: 0 Flatnrnability: 1 Reactivity: 0 Recommended Uses: photoconductor for Electrophotographic Equipment Restrictions: Information on this data sheet represents our current data and the best opinion as to the proper use in handling of this product under normal conditions specified in our User's Manual. However, neither Minolta Co., Ltd. nor any of its subsidiaries assumes any liability whatsoever for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. All materials may present unknown hazards and should be used with caution. Although certain hazards are described herein, we do not guarantee that these are the only hazards which exist. Literature References: ANSI Z400.1-1993 ISO 11014-1 Commission Directive 91/15S/EEC .. . .. 18 . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128 .www,cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood,mn~us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 7 July 2005 RE: Sign Permit - Oasis MarketlMarathon Gas FILE NO.: 405 (Sign Permits) ;. Identi-Graphics has requested permits for new signs for the Oasis Market located in the southeast comer of the SmithtownRoad Country Club Road intersection. The signs are part change in the gasoperation from Amoco to Marathon. You will ~ecall that ~ temporary sign permit was approved at the last meeting of the City Council. . Exhibit A illustrates the proposed signs.for the property. Although the area of the proposed signs is Gonsistent with Shorewood's zoning regulations, the number of signs proposed is well in excess ofwhatthe Code allows. Following is how theproposed signage compares to the Code: Pylon (Freestanding) Sign For the most partthe pylon sign (upper right comer of Exhibit A) is a redo of the current freestanding sign, and contains a totalof 109.5 square feet (only one side of a freestanding sign is counted). Approval ofthis sign is recomriiended. Wall Signs . The application proposes to retain the existing Oasis Marketwall sign on the north side ofthe building and the existing BJ Automotive sign on the west side ofthe building. They also propose a new 10" x 10' Oasis Market sign on the east side ofthe building and three Marathon signs On the gas canopy. Since the sign reg\llations limit commercial properties to one freestanding sign and three wall signs, the application is in excess of ~. . t~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER :# 3 )). . what is allowed. It is recommended that the new Oasis sign on the east side ofthe building and two ofthe Marathon signs be eliminated. Other Signs The new Marathon gas operation includes large lettered "Marathon" signs on each of the pumps. The~e must be removed. While window signs are allowed, they count against the allowable number and area of signs. Window. signs should be removed. Occasionally a "sandwich board" has appeared on the subject property. The property owner is hereby reminded that temporary signs are limited and require permits. . Thisitem has been placed on the consent agenda for the 11 July City Council meeting. It shoUld be noted that the sign company has begun work without the necessary permits. A stop work order has been issued, however, much of the work has been done. No additional work should be completed until the excess signs have been removed. Cc: Craig Dawson . Tim Keane Identi -Graphics . Oasis Market (Manager) '. . . . . . . Oasis 583 24365 Smithtown Rd Shorewood Fr~e..s+4nditl1 Sij n (~..dpne.) PROPOSED EXISTING 10 SIGN (154.0Bsq fl) 10 SIGN (130.18 sq fl) Oasis - 79.75" X BO.5" (<<$~l Amoco - 79.75" x BO.S" (44.58 sq It) Marathon I Price - 67.25" x 80.5" (37.6 sq It) Price - 67.25" x 80S (37.6 sq It) Car Wash -18.75" x 80.5" (10.48 sq It) BJ Automotive - 8' x 6' (48 sq It) Reader Board - 24" x 80.5" (13.42 sq It) BJ Automotive - 8' x 6' (48 sq It) CANOPY (35.94 sq fl) CANOPY (126 sq fl) East - Marathon - 15" x 115" (11.98 sq It) Amoco - 36" x 14' (42sq It) West - Marathon - is" x 115" (11.98 sq It) Amoco - 36" x 14' (42 sq It) North - Marathon - 15" x 115" (11.98sqlt) Amoco - 36" x 14' (42sq It) BLOG SIGN (135.46 sq fl) BLDG SIGN (135.46 sq fl) Oasis Market - 36" x 28' (84 sqlt) Oasis Market - 36" x 2B' (84 sq It) Oasis Market -10" x 10' (8.33 sq It) Oasis Market - 10" x 10' (8.33 sq It) BJ Automotive - 23" x 22.5' (43.13 sq It) BJ Automotive - 23" x 22.5' (43.13 sq It) TOTAL SQUARE FEET (325.48 sq fl) TOTAL SQUARE FEET (391.64 sq fl) BLOG SIGN 36" x 28' - OASIS _?'~:r~. MARKET I,) , 10" x 10' ~~~~4 23" x 22.5' J trI :x ::r ..' c:r ..' ~ 36' x 62' I MARATHON I 36' x 62' [MARATHON r'~THON 36" x 66' 15 ;J> CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.u5 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Craig W, Dawson, City Administrator f' k July 7, 2005 LJl/ SLMPD Matters . Councilmember Wellens has requested that this item be placed on the agenda for tonight's Council meeting, so that the Council may consider formally revoking the approval ofthe recommendation by the SLMPD Issues Group Recent Chronology: . . On May 26, the SLMPD Issues Group's approved a package of recommended changes related to the joint powers agreement (JP A) and to some operational matters, . On June 7, the Greenwood City Council discussed the recommendation and decided to act on it at a special council meeting on June 30, . On June 8, the Tonka Bay City Council approved the recommendation, . On June 25, the Excelsior City Council decided to take no action regarding the recommendation, and requested that the cities reconvene the Issues Group and continue discussions beyond June 30, . On June 27, the Shorewood City Council approved the recommendation; stated that its approval was valid through midnight June 30; stated that it would not continue Issues Group discussion on the recommendation it made on May 26; and instructed the City Attorney to examine options for dissolution of the organization if all four cities had not approved the recommendation by midnight June 30, . On June 28, the Tonka Bay City Council stated that its approval ofthe Issues Group recommendation was valid through June 30, and that it would not continue Issues Group discussion on the recommendation it made on May 26, . On June 30, the Greenwood City Council approved the Issues Group recommendation, and encouraged the SLMPD member city councils to state their positions on the recommendation in writing, . . Excelsior City Council will hold a work session on July 11 regarding SLMPD matters, . . . On July 6, staff and attorneys among Shorewood, Greenwood, and Tonka Bay had an exploratory meeting regarding the Shorewood City Council's directive on legal alternatives, Council Action: The Council should consider how it may want to follow up on its action of June 27, n ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER #9A . . MEMORANDUM DATE: . TO: FROM: RE: . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us July 7, 2005 Mayor and City Council Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Agenda Item #10A Due to a watermain break, the Public Works Director's cover memorandum for this item as well as the draft Resolution will follow tomorrow (Friday) under a separate cover. . . 41= IDA n ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Larry Brown, City of Shorewood July 7,2005 Page 1 . TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Larry Brown, P.E. - City Engineer and Director of Public Works, City of Shorewood From: Kevin Newman, P.E., WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: July 7, 2005 Re: Enchanted Point Dry Hydrant Relocation. Shorewood, MN WSB Project #01640-000 1.0 Introduction . The City of Shorewood is considering a request to relocate one of its three dry hydrant systems located on Enchanted Island and Shady Island. These dry hydrant systems were constructed in 1994 as a means to help the fire department control a fire if one occurred in that area. The hydrant proposed for relocation, was identified as system one when initially constructed and is located on the northeast part of Enchanted Island, at 4550 Enchanted Point. The hydrant was . installed adjacent to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka on property previously owned by Gerald and Gretchen Grewe. The City of Shore wood acquired a permanent easement from the Grewe's for access to the hydrant. Since that time the property has switched ownership. Michael Catain is the current owner and has petitioned to have the hydrant moved off of his property as he is planning to build a security system, which will include fencing around his property. The security system would inhibit access to the hydrant by the fire department. 2.0 Dry Hydrant Concept . A dry hydrant system is a non-pressurized pipe system that is permanently installed in existing lakes, ponds, streams or other water body. A dry hydrant system consists of an arrangement of piping with one end extended out into a water source, such as a lake and the other end located on dry land and available for connection to a fire pumper truck. Some type of suction screen or strainer is typically installed on the end of the piping that extends into the lake to remove silt or vegetation from the suction pipe. A dry hydrant provides a simple cost effective solution for a fire department to control fire in an area where a municipal water system is not available for fire suppreSSIOn. An alternative to a dry hydrant system is to truck water into an area by mobile water supply vehicles. However, the critical factor is whether or not the fire department can maintain an uninterrupted supply of water when fighting a fire. An uninterrupted flow of250 gpm for 2 hours, as a minimum is critical in controlling a fire. The dry hydrant system eliminates the inefficiency and complexity of long-distance trucking of water. . . . . . . Larry Brown, City of Shorewood July 7,2005 Page 2 3.0 Proposed Relocation of Dry Hydrant The Dry Hydrant located at 4550 Enchanted Point, on the property owned by Mr Catain consists of a standard hydrant barrel on the shoreline that is attached to an 8-inch polyethylene line that extends approximately 165 feet out into a bay area of Lake Minnetonka. The end of the 8-inch line is located just below the lake bottom, with rock riprap and filter fabric wrapped around the inlet to screen out silt and vegitation. In January, 2005 the Mound Fire Department performed a flow test on the hydrant and were able to withdraw water at a rate of375 gpm. Figure 1 shows the current location of the dry hydrant and the proposed location for relocating the dry hydrant. The relocation point would be on to the public right of way of Enchanted Point Road. As shown on Figure 1, relocation of the hydrant would require extension ofthe suction line by approximately 315 feet. The elevation of the hydrant would be approximately 1 foot higher than at its present location. A hydraulic analysis was performed to determine the additional suction head loss that would result from the extension of the suction line. The hydraulic analysis was performed first assuming the line extension would be 8-inch diameter piping and then assuming the line extension would be 10-inch diameter piping. With an 8-inch diameter pipe the additional suction head loss would be approximately 2.5 feet at 375 gpm. With a lO-inch diameter pipe the additional suction head would be approximately 1.5 feet. Based on these computations and discussions with the manufacturer of pumps for fire pumper trucks the reduction in flow by extension of the suction line would be minimal. However, to minimize the suction head loss and accommodate the volume of water needed for a fire flow, it is recommended that the suction line extension is lO-inch in diameter. Maintenance of the dry hydrant system, in particular the suction inlet, is critical for be able to obtain a reasonable fire flow from the hydrant system. Weeds and silt should be periodically removed from the rock riprap and filter fabric around the suction inlet to prevent additional suction losses when the hydrant system is needed for fire fighting. 4.0 Estimated Cost for Relocation of Dry Hydrant An engineer's estimate of probable project cost for relocating the dry hydrant is shown in attached Table No.1. The cost estimate is based on the assumption that high groundwater will be encountered during construction and that erosion control measures will be required to prevent runoff of silt and soil during excavation into Lake Minnetonka. Larry Brown, City of Shorewood July 7,2005 Page 3 Table 1 Enchanted Point Dry Hydrant Relocation E' E' f P b bl P . t C t n21neers stlmate 0 ro a e rO]ec os Item Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price No. 1 Mobilization LS 1 2,000.00 $2,000 2 Dewatering LS 1 3,000.00 $3,000 3 Silt Fence, type heavy duty LF tOO 4.00 $400 (Orange) 4 Flotation silt curtain LF 60 15.00 $900 5 Remove/reset existing hydrant EA 1 1,500.00 $1,500 6 8" gate valve and box. LS 1 1,500.00 $1,500 7 10-inch HDPE suction piping LF 315 35.00 $11,000 8 6-inch DIP piping LF 10 40.00 $400 9 Ductile Iron Fittings LBS 310 4.50 $1,400 to Granular pipe bedding CY 50 20.00 $1,000 material 11 Connect to Existing EA 1 1,500.00 $1,500 Watermain (8") 12 Seeding (including topsoil, Acre O.tO 3,000.00 $300 seed, fert, mulch, & disc anchor) 13 Erosion control blanket SY 485 3.00 $1,500 Subtotal $26,400 Contingencies (15%) $4,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $30,400 Engineering, Administration & Legal $16,600 Total Estimated Pro.iect Cost $47,000 5.0 Summary and Conclusions The City is considering a request to relocate the dry hydrant located at 4550 Enchanted Point on the property owned by Mr. Michael Catain. Mr. Catain is planning to install a security system, including fence, around his property which would inhibit access to the dry hydrant in its current location. The proposed location for placement of the hydrant is in the public right of way of Enchanted Point Road. Access to the hydrant would be more readily available by the fire department and benefit adjacent residences. The additional suction headloss resulting from the extension of the suction line would have a minimal effect on the available fire flow from the hydrant. The total estimated project cost for relocating the dry hydrant is $47,000 kn/ srb " . . . . . .. .. .. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DRY HYDRANT .. / .. . . . . i e r ! ~ ~ 3 ;f t ~- on .. IIIIGC flGUIII: . . z z 'Z Q ::& o 5 ci ... C! 0 Q w 0 ~ a: 1!: ~ 'Z w ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ii Ii :Sii _I ilE II I . i I ~I " CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 11,2005 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET For the record, please print your name and address below. Thank you. Name Address 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.