102504 CC Reg AgP
t
(',
'.
...
-
t
<'
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 25,2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
Mayor Love _
Garfunkel
Lizee
Zerby _
Turgeon _
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Executive Session Minutes, October 11,2004 (Att. - Minutes)
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, October 11,2004 (Att.- Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions
Therein: .
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from
Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.- Claims List)
B. Staffing - none
C. Authorize Expenditure of Funds for Southeast Water Tower Inspection Services (Att.-
Public Works Director's memorandum) .
D. Proclamation in Support of Kids Voting (Att. - Deputy Clerk's memorandum,
Proclamation)
E. Approval of a Setback Variance and Variance to Expand a Nonconforming Structure
(Att. - Resolution)
Applicants: R.J. and Melanie Rogney
Location: 5950 Grant Street
4.. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken)
~\
.
..
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - October 25, 2004
PAGE 2 OF2
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Recognition of Park Commissioner Pat Arnst, and Planning Commissioners Deborah
Borkon and Donna Woodruff (Att. City Administrator's memorandum)
B. Report by Tim Litfin, Minnetonka Community Education and Services Executive
Director (Att. - City Administrator's memorandum)
6. PUBLIC HEARING
7. PARKS
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Setback Variance (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum, Draft Resolution)
Applicants: Carl and Ali Zinn
Location: 5820 Ridge Road
B. Variance from Hardcover Regulations (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum, Draft
Resolution)
Applicants: Dick and Kelly Cassidy
Location: 26140 Birch Bluff Road
9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Planning Commission Appointment (Att. - City Administrator's memorandum,
Resolution)
10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
A. Approve Plans, Specifications and Estimates for Freeman Park/Shorewood Oaks
Drainage Project (Att. - Public Works Director's memorandum, Resolution)
B. Authorize Expenditure of Funds for Freeman Park/Shorewood Oaks Drainage Project
(Att. - Public Works Director's memorandum)
c. County Road 19/Country Club Road/Smithtown Road Intersection Project Update (Att. _
Public Works Director's memorandum)
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Construction Update
B. Mayor & City Council
12. ADJOURN
-
~.
..
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 25 October 2004
.
A Liquor Committee meeting is scheduled for 6:00 PM this evening
A Work Session will be held this evening immediately following the Regular Council meeting.
Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3B: Staffing - no action required
.
Agenda Item #3C: Staff solicited proposals for the interior and exterior inspection of the
Southeast Area Water Tower, located near the intersection of Old Market Road and State
Highway 7. Two firms responded to the solicitations for this proposal. Staff's
recommendation is to perform the more detailed report and cost estimating on the front
end of the process, to insure that the necessary funds through bonding can be anticipated.
Staff is recommending approval of the expenditure of funds from the Municipal Water
Fund, as outlined in KLM's proposal for inspection services.
Agenda Item #3D: Minnetonka Public Schools has requested the City participate in the "Kids
Voting Minnesota" program - a program which allows children in K-12 to go to the polls
on Election Day and actually cast their vote at a polling table just for the children.
Arrangements have been made to provide separate space at each of the four mainland
polling locations in the City of Shorewood for "Kids Voting". Minnetonka Public
Schools is arranging for volunteer staff at each polling location. This is the second year
the city is working with the Minnetonka Public Schools to provide this program. A
motion adopting the Kids Voting Proclamation is recommended.
Agenda Item #3E: At its second meeting in September, the City Council directed staff to
prepare findings offact approving a variance, with conditions, for the property at 5950
Grant Street (Rogney). The attached resolution contains the stipulation that the 23.2-foot
variance from the rear setback requirement will be made up in the front yard. Note that
there is no mention in the resolution of the previous zoning violation. This is because the
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 25 October 2004
Page 2 of3
~
applicants have removed the pool and patio as recommended by the Planning
Commission. Approval of the resolution is recommended.
Agenda Item #5A: Former Park Commissioner Pat Arnst will be present this evening to
receive a recognition plaque for her 7 and 1/2 years of service on the Park Commission.
Former Planning Commissioners Deborah Borkon, who served 3 years; and Donna
Woodruff, who served almost 6 years, are also to receive recognition; however, they will
not be present this evening.
Agenda Item #5B: Tim Litkin, MCES Director, will be present this evening to provide an
update ofMCES activities and the restructuring of the MCES Advisory Council proposed
by the Board of the Minnetonka Independent School District. He will be prepared to
answer any questions Council may have regarding MCES activities and the proposed
restructuring of the MCES Advisory Council.
Agenda Item #8A: Carl and Ali Zinn have requested a setback variance to build a three-car
garage on the front side of their existing home at 5820 Ridge Road. Their property is
adversely affected by severe changes in topography and a second private road that cuts
through the most buildable part of the lot. The Planning Commission voted unanimously
to recommend approval of the variance. A draft resolution to that effect is included in
your packet for your consideration.
.
Agenda Item #8B: Dick and Kelly Cassidy propose to replace the existing home at 26140
Birch Bluff Road with a new home. They have requested a variance to the maximum
hardcover requirement imposed by shoreland management regulations. They propose to
mitigate the excess hardcover by the use of a permeable paver system. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance. Ordinarily, we
would suggest that Council direct staff to prepare findings for the next meeting.
However, due to 60-day rule provisions, a draft resolution has been prepared. The
resolution reflects the Planning Commission's recommendation. If you have questions
relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Director prior to
Monday night's meeting.
.
Agenda Item #9A: Recently, Planning Commissioner Donna Woodruff resigned from the
Planning Commission. Council may consider extending an appointment to one of two
candidates who interviewed earlier this year for this Commission. Should Council decide
to extend an offer, approval of a resolution making Planning Commission appointments
is in order.
Agenda Item #lOA: During the October 11th, 2004, City Council meeting, Staff was provided
direction regarding finalization of the design documents for the drainage way to be
constructed between the properties of 26030 and 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive. In
preparation for construction, Staff directed WSB and Associates to survey the outlot and
stake the alignment of the drainage way in the field. After stakes were placed, it became
necessary to conduct an impromptu meeting in the field with Mr. Healy and Ms. Siverts,
neighbors to the outlot. Mr. Healy and Ms. Siverts agreed to a revised alignment that is a
compromise between the original plan documents and a straight centerline, which does
encroach onto Mr. Healy's property of 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive. Both property
i
..
(
.
.
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 25 October 2004
Page 3 of3
owners agreed, in principle, to the compromise. Staff is recommending approval of the
plans, specifications, and estimates prepared by WSB and Associates, as amended.
Agenda Item #10B: Staffhas solicited proposals from several firms to construct the drainage
way/path for the Freeman Park/Shorewood Oaks project. Only one proposal was
received. The remaining firms declined Staff's request for proposal. The proposal was
provided by Midwest Asphalt, Inc. for an amount of $20,955.00. Representatives of
Midwest Asphalt stated that they are able to perform the work at this rate since their firm
is currently mobilizing equipment for a previous contract with the City of Shorewood for
the bituminous overlay project. The overlay project will commence on Monday, October
25th. If awarded, this project would occur simultaneously to the overlay project. Staffis
recommending acceptance of the proposal provided Midwest Asphalt, Inc., with the
amount of expenditure authorized not to exceed $25,000 to provide for contingencies.
Agenda Item #10C: Bids were received and opened on Wednesday, October 20,2004, for the
County Road 19 - Smithtown Road Improvement Project. The low bid was provided by
Eureka Construction, Inc., for a total bid amount of$ 3,566,322.45. It is vitally important
to note that $1,523,066.60 of the above total is eligible for State Aid reimbursement.
Having stated this, Staffwas performing status checks with the Department of Minnesota
State Aid during compilation ofthis report. Much to our surprise, Staff was informed
that while the City of Shorewood had placed a reserve for advance funding with the State
Aid Office, funds were not guaranteed. Fund availability was dependent upon a first
come first serve basis. The State now reports that zero funds are currently available for
advancement. This late development has forced Staff to reconsider the financing
alternatives to be considered. It is anticipated that the award of the project will be placed
on the Council agenda for November 8th, 2004
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6:30 P.M.
MINUTES
n Ri\f\
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 6:31 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; CounciImembers Garfunkel and Turgeon, Administrator Dawson; Attorney
Keane; Special Attorney Hoff; Engineer Brown; and Finance Director Burton
Absent:
CounciImembers Lizee and Zerby
B.
Review Agenda
Without objection from Council, Mayor Love proceeded with the Agenda for the meeting.
2. LITIGATION RE: JOHNSON CASES
Attorney Hoff shared information pertaining to the Johnson litigation with the City.
3. ADJOURN
Garfunkel moved, Lizee seconded, Adjourning the Executive Session Meeting of October 11, 2004, at
6:57 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
Attest:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
4/=- ).. ff
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
o Rf\fl
1.
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
A.
Roll Cal
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilrnembers Garfunkel, and Turgeon; Administrator Dawson; Attorney
Keane; Engineer Brown; and Finance Director Burton
Absent:
Counci1rnember Lizee and Zerby; Planning Director Nielsen
.
B.
Review Agenda
Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the Agenda as presented. Motion passed 3/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Work Session Minutes, September 27, 2004
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of
September 27, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 3/0.
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, September 27, 2004 (Att.- Minutes)
Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
. September 27, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 3/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent
Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Staffing - No action
C. !\,dopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-089, "A Resolution Approving Licenses to
Retailers to Sell Tobacco Products."
D. Setting the Date for the Annual Appreciation Event
E. Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 408. "An Ordinance Amending Section 105.05 of the
Shorewood City Code Relating to Mayor and City Council Salaries."
=It- ;( 8
CITY COUNCn.. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
October 11, 2004
Page 2 of6
F. Schedule Canvassing Board Meeting
Motion passed 3/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented.
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Report from MCES Representative Tad Shaw
Tad Shaw, representative for the City of Shorewood to the Minnetonka Community Education Services
(MCES) Advisory Council, reported on recent actions and past history of the MCES Advisory Council.
He noted the Advisory Council had found management deficiencies in the MCES program approximately .
six to seven years ago, and had requested a management audit. The Advisory Council had worked with the
District at that time with regard to the issues of concern with MCES programming. The MCES Advisory
Council had not approved the budget, a designated function of the Advisory Council, for three years in
effort to make a statement of concern to the Minnetonka School District School Board. After three years of
lack of approval of the budget by the Advisory Council, the School Board authorized a management audit
to review the actions ofMCES. The Audit reported similar findings to the stated beliefs of the MCES
Advisory Council and further suggested formation of an "ad hoc" committee to define the future direction
of the MCES. A report was written regarding the findings of the ad hoc committee. Mr. Shaw stated the
report was written by the School District Administration representatives and was not representative of the
entire committee at large.
Mr. Shaw went on to explain there were notable differences in recent meetings due to a lack of director for
MCES. Due to this absence, the directorship was being handled directly by the Superintendent of the
Minnetonka School District. He stated he did not believe the Superintendent was working cooperatively
with the Advisory Council, and the Superintendent had indicated to the Advisory Council his belief that the .
Advisory Council was operating illegally. Mr. Shaw also stated the Advisory Council had not been notified
of the proposed changes shared with the MCES member cities in a recent letter. Mr. Shaw went on to state
he believed this effort was made in effort to place the management policies of the MCES in the hands of the
School District School Board.
Mayor Love stated he had been contacted by Superintendent Peterson informally approximately thirty days
ago regarding the proposed changes. He also noted the mayors of the ten member cities met with the
Superintendent on a quarterly basis to discuss issues of concern. Mayor Love stated he would bring the
issues raised by Mr. Shaw to the next meeting for further discussion. He also stated he believed the
Council was still finding out all the facts on this issue. Mayor Love went on to state he respected Mr.
Shaw's service to the City as well as his opinion on this issue; however, he wanted additional information
on this issue. Without the objection of Council, he requested a direct presentation be made to Council by a
representative of the School District on this issue. He believed, however, the City should withhold action
until more information could be made available.
1
CITY COUNCll.. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
October 11, 2004
Page 3 of6
Councilmember Garfunkel stated he also thought it was important to gather additional information on this
issue, and he was uncertain what the motivation was for the School Board to move forward in the manner
presented.
Councilmember Turgeon questioned the rationale for the large number of potential members for the
proposed advisory Council, as well as the process for selection of those committee members. She also
questioned why cities were not notified earlier in this process regarding the proposed by law changes as it
would affect the representation of each city.
Mayor Love thanked Mr. Shaw for his efforts in bringing these issues to the Council.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
.
7.
PARKS
A. Report on the Park Commission meeting of September 28, 2004
In the absence of Park Commission Chair Davis, Engineer Brown reported on the September 28, 2004,
Park Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minute of that meeting).
8. PLANNING
Commissioner White reported on matters considered and actions taken at the October 5,2004, Planning
Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
None.
.
10.
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Discussion of the Shorewood Oaks Drainage Issues
Engineer Brown explained that at the September 27, 2004, City Council Work Session Meeting, Mr. Pete
Willenbring, ofWSB & Associates, had presented alternatives for the Shorewood Oaks drainage issue for
consideration by the Council and neighborhood. At that meeting, Staffhad indicated a meeting with the
n~ighbors would follow based on the alternatives presented, and a design for a bituminous overflow swale
to direct drainage from the Freeman Park area, through the City's out lot, and onto Shorewood Oaks Drive
to avoid further infiltration to the neighborhood, would be brought back to the Council for additional
consideration.
Engineer Brown went on to state Staffhad met with Mr. John Healy, 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive, and
Ms. Molly Siverts, 26030 Shorewood Oaks Drive, regarding the proposed overflow swale location and
implications to surrounding trees and lots. Engineer Brown then shared a proposed overflow swale design,
noting the proposed alignment for the swale was outside of the City property, due to presence of a large
cottonwood tree in the middle of the out lot area. He also explained Staffhad received comments that the
g.!!!atl1
S-<:fIlJg
S. a ~ s'
. fIi I:l 0
I>> ..... 0
I:l fIl ..,
Q.. U~ ~
s::: Q.. O~
~ ::r
o
[~~
,<~'a
= S.
~ sa. o.
anQ.
S' a g-
Et. S. "E.
fIl. go 'g
n 0 Il)
~ r.l tI.l
~a~
::r: 2!..g
o ~ 0
~ I:l fIl
<: ..... 0
o fIl Q.
ia ~ ~
000
= a E.
.....I>>Q..
0H'>c:r
fIl W 0
E.....n
000
~Q.51
';;~2
ggon
g 0 [
fit ~ s'
8 ~. go
aOq 0
Q..oa
c:r .... Il)
o ~ ....
c...C'<
""-Oil)
ERfIl....
ngg.
E.~o
..... I;T" H)
~ooo
Q..ag
-oa
g ia ~
~~8-
gs:::o
rn E-
o OOfIl ~ "0 na ~ = s:::
c:r( 5" go :::: e. g ~ g.::r ~. g.
. .., ,.c S' ~ = 0 ::r -
. ~ c OCI ~ n ::I. 0 c:r '<
<:0 -=.:e...,ooo
OCI 8 c. g ';<: .....0 rn I>> ~ :;:.
rl.Q..0 fIl rn _u 0
I;T" = "C 00 n Ei' s- c:r ~
~ O8o~gog E:i aufll
~ E- ~ ..... a ~ ~ ::t. ~ ~
,;;..,;r0 [0""'0 ci 0 0
oo~"",.., ~w
:3 2!. ;;r 0'1 - go a <: 0
g~~c~~o~~oo
fitl:lgo5og.r.lon::r
fit 0 ....::r n .....::1. sa 9
.... . - I>> I>> Ci' I>> ... ".
H) 0.., Q.."O c tii 8 ~
e. ga ~ c2 n S' = n 3 8-
=ogI>>OOClQ.Oo
.... ;j"'::I I>> S' C Q.
~i~ig~~~g-~
~gg~Q..Q..~call}
o n '< a go "C d". n t:::l
~ g ~ "t:I "g 0 fi) ~ 0 ::I.
:;!fIlflloornnoa<:
o S- E fI r.l ~ ~ Q. S. uO
;;]~'-<!.....::Ie!.I>>~ ~
~ _. ~ r;;' lit 0 n .., ~ 1>>[
0......., -::t.~ 8 go"t:l
a~"t:Ifi)ciofll02
o g rf ~ rn I>> 5' fIl fir ~
~ S:o n g,gOCl ~ 0 0
o c:r:3 I>> 01 oo-H)~
::I. 0 0 'g..., .::r uO g:. ~
Oc...ia",,1>> OfllO
55i00Cl'< .aCfll5
S. ~ H) "t:I (:;) . ~ g. ~ .....
OCI a s- t ~ ~ 8 ~ ~~
~~o fIl o..e;:.Q.. u ~
~. g ~: a ~ g ~ 1 ~ fa'
~~Ss~rnCJ~::r::r
o efll OCI. Q. 5" go fIl El ~ 1>>$
"C S ~c8o~'
.., ::r _. c:r
00 og-I>> n c...n 'OCI
c:r go "t:I Q.. =:; . ""- 0 p.. go
a ~ g. ~ a.s ~: ~ pt 0
fi.i 0 = e. g ~ 0 ia oo"t:I
. ~NOQ......PO::ra
0~1>> 0 ..,oc:r
E. C5 a go H) 00 0 ,.c CD'
Q..c?~l>>gogo~:3
~ s:~ g ,st. Eo ~ c. t:h
-c:r~_ fIl"t:lO~
~O~Q.. 01>>=&
~ . t:p c... c:r . ~ g. & I::h
~O""-Oo:;.;-~ 0
:3 d". c 0 I>> ..,
g rn Q.'< go
u 0
prog-g,6
8.~~::r5
fIl 3 ~ I>>
n - 0 ~. '"rj
-~Q..s'
l ::: a. OCI if
OCI 0 1;;, go e.
S. g- ~ ~ ~
g-o:~~
"t:I~l:lo~
a I::h;';' g 0
"COfll 00
0': c 8':::r
fIl.... 0 fIl 0
8orfg,'El a
~ g ] .g ~.
e.oc:roo
o ia ~~ Q..
I>> 0 n. 0
~;~ifE-
~O'<fIll::l
g ~ ~ i ~.
Q.. e. Q. Q. uO
~ ~ s. go a
5"go~~[
~[~s:go
. OCI ::.r=~~
o 0 0 tI.l
Ell a g S'
ggr.l~
I>> Q. 0 ~
OCI go e;:. ..,
~~~g,
;'~gg-
~ Q.g"C
- = ~ I>>
~~8~
=:;. c:r Q. sil
= 0 ..... '<
o ~..., u
I>> "" 0 c:r
8.~~a
~ ~ g ~
'g g, ci
5l 00 Q.. 5
o -.... ~ .....
g a. =- s'
~. Jg. 0 ~
Pi. ~ ~
-
.
::r "t:I 0 0 0 "01>> :3 t:tl
o 0Q. "t:I "t:I a Otl I>> ....
c:r....0tl.....- O!:l:t:::
o go.... ..... (tl 0 ~ ~
~ tt. g, g g a = u.., s:
<: ~ '"rj ~ ..... 5 Et. ~ o.
2 '< a "C 0 fIl' Q. ~
J-'- n 0 ::r: .., I::h.... u
~ ~ :3 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~r.l~~ia.a'~~~
..,1>>'"t:lR"8o..... Q.o
IQ..~ Q.I>> c)"::.r= go 00
g.:;.;-::rtl.l = 0 ::r
I>> ~ 0 l>> N fIl ~. 0
'<<:::r fIl'"
o S' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8: ~
~ g- = ~~. fIl' ~. g 8-
a"t:lS!!Oo~~no
O..,Cli=-CfIlQ.-e..
:.2. [1. ~ rn u~ go~. II}
a~~Q.~5"o~l::l
~'g ::.r= ~ ~ a ~ ~ g- ~.
o ,. ..... 0 <: ':t ~.
fIl.go~~.g~f
<: O<:fIlu.....O
e- [ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. .g
~ ::r~0tl o' "t:I g.8o
~~~ ~!$~a 5l n
<:..,.....~_fIl,oO
~ ~~.a'g-g.a a ~
o !:'h q d". ~ s.,po g =.:
r~Ega0Cl5g~
o NO=.....Q...,
.., u ~ 0 S. I>> "0
I>> "C ~ ~. "C ht' OCI .... a
c:r"':S-='Op,. go~
,.... ~ g ~ ~ .... s::: 0,.;1.
g ..... - S' ..... .., ~ Q..
. ~ ~ S'OCI 2. ~ ~Jg.
o .5! 0 OCI ~ ~ .... ~ I>>
_u..""',o_.....t::: ~
... ,,!::;j -.... c:rO 000
; ~. ~ 8 a 0 g. ~ ~
~ go ~ :3 ~. 8 s. 2!. ::t.
~OaO~~Otlgci
l>>"afllia~O::r""'fIl
'< 0. ~ 0 - H'> I>> ;j .....
. =0 H)'< WQ..g 0
..... ~ I>> ~ d". 6. g. Et.
~. u "E. 0 :;; e:0tl fIl
~1>>"t:IU '.n
a.:sogg~~~
1;;, Q.. e. 0 & 0 1>>.
sggg~I>>~!
o s:0CI ~o
u go fIl
~ 0
~ a tl1~~ g~ a V-!
.2. :3. g. "C ~ go.g ~ g
o S ~ 0 S' 0 0 ::r 0
f4~R"gOtl ~~808
Q..Q.d".g..... 0~:3
e.8e.Q)0~..,"C
- Q. ::1.::1 go ~
'i ~ ~ ~ eo ~ 0 -.
':::1 .....oc:rrnnO
;:r.~gfllo..,o=
~ .., 1>>. fIl a c2 ::+ g,
"t:I gotiiQ:::.:~ g go
ao....oc[~~o
fIl c:r I:l . 0
o ,.... c:r o. OCI 0 ~
!a 0 - ol::h ~ Q.. fIl
o ;;r q- _.
go .g.= 8'" 0 o~
Oo~a. e.Ou
n c 8. =. = .... g 00
g~~~g~g-~
g.g ~ ~&.g a i'r
n~<:..,o""':3S-
oo~. =Oo::r
~~~Wg,;B.S:
s. ~ e;:. Q9 go o. e:
~ e. 0 S' 0 fIl ~ fIl'
Q.088~~ a
.-+~ "'OJ;;.o.fIl
00~_::10-fIl
"C'" UJ ~ I>> 0 ....
I>> 0 0 a 0 I:l I>> g
'< I>> H)~ ~ Q.Oq VJ
1::h"O ~13 fIl'" a "!::
~a~s:~~g~
g- ~. e. R" 0 s g c:r
~s-p,.Q..e""'o
~.....~ ;:;:~ 0 i'rgo
.....g.~ ....H)S-"t:I
g '< ::t. ~ 0 go c:r ..,
11)' ~ <: tI.l go 0 8 .g
J;;.o N ~ s' 0 q- 1:1 0
g~~'8~u8~~
fit ~ ~ rt g. s::: g. ~
~ 0 5 Cl! fIl 0 :;!
fIl _[fIl .....tr.. Q..o
o ~l n 00 ..,
n dti g fIl .... ~ fIl
~: S' ~ ~ ~ e;t: ~
8o~s:::~Q..a-goQ..
"!::t:tl"'a:~qO~
~..,~o~o~o
;;r 0 -<: .., "C = =. 0
a.~=.:goata.~!3
=. 13 CD 0 fIl '< 0 g
fIl = n$!o I:l .....
c:ro...-.....
~. ~ i:~'
. ~ fIl R"
Q..
.
~ f!!.. 0 .., "!::
O 0 I>> 0 ~.
_fIlt:::p..
aCGOOtt
Q.. 8Q..;;r
..,g,gno
8og:......CH)
~og~g-
o fIl s::: OCI 0
~~~gci
_O......rna
q- ~ ~ S<. 0
~ 0 ~..... ~
.... c '< [
o _.. fIl
= Q.. fIl ~
g ~ 'El ~. ~
go~.g ~n
o <: 0 "!:: g
= ~::L ~. _
!t .., '< go Q..
OCI "C ~ 0 c:r
::r c.., 0
g'e;~~8.
s' 0 ~ ~ c
0tl~g.....8
"OO;j..,Q..
.g ~ ~ ~ ~
aag,8o:3
o' ~ e;:. a ::;:
fIl ....0 a- fIl
~ ..... fIl S. a
Q..~~0CI::l
~ ~ CD g g
~l ~ I.j
~. I>> . "0
5 OCI Q.. 0
~ R a ~. 8.
fIlE;og:.fIl
o j;.P 0 N.
g ::r tl1 =:;. 0
.....o~.go
~~=r~~
~ <: 8 i+ I::h
.....0 ~ "1 0 8
u t:tl H) ....
g-g-~g-~
q ~ 13 = 0
R ~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
. ~ & g,
CD'go ~
o
"'don
~~::3
OC...ol
....=-......
c~n
""'1-"0
Q\I-"~
~ Z
~n
~~
r=
g
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
tll
...,~ .
VI
~
E-l
l;)
~
::s
t.:l
~
~
~
::s
;
~
=~
ug
ZN
l;) ~ Ie
0.-1....
utQ
j>I.clt'l
E-lS'
~y=
uO~
.....
'0
fIl':;::l
~ 8
"Cc
a....
i>>U
- 0
~.;3
.~
~ .~
~
=i
o CJ
.~ B
~ 19
g.8
o
CJ 0
0.0
.;3:32
.;3 8:::1
.~ 0
af]
~ fIl
en ~ .
~Oi>>
~93"a
OO~
1-0 :> ~
r:x:l 0 .
I-oo..!:l
3.;3~
.S ul e
~e~
~..........
~?:>Cl
= ~ 0
.,g en e
fjj fIl 0
o 8 ~
&00
~en ~ a
~.;3e
Q 4-4 ....
~ 0 6-
1-0 "a e
o >
~o'O
~ e =
,.t::j0"C
01-0-
..... ~ 5
o ~ ~
g .S "C
c.. en Cl
en~Cd
e ~ ~
~oola
~ ~ ~
.0 tIl .....
~~~ ~ ~
>.~I-o"~o-=
.o08~.;30
o.S CJ "C :> e
"aOOOCl;;>O
~ r~ ~ Cd.~ ~
tIJ...... a ....?........
~ ~ ~ l~ @'
93aao;:;~
~:a-5.;3 ~ ~
o .....H ::;I.S o:.a .
en rn.......s::l 0
5 :325"BSl]
.1....8&>~"afll
.S r;3 ~ fIl:32 0
"C -;::105.;3
:.o~~"C~~~
.s8~-H~]~
1-08_80 0
ca"C~~I-o""'~~
] ~ 'a .g ~ ~ l
Cl]....,.Cl30~
~ :> la "C.a a 0
e;;>oa~..s::lM
~a~"C~ g ~
00050;:; . en fIl
.... ~ _ 0 tIl 00 en
.8otll~~~3
o tj:l 0:E! +-! la =
.;3 ~ ] .S.g ~ 5
~ ~..s::l e.s ~"B
"C td a ] ~'2 ~
o 5"B .~ Cd.o.o
~:+:l 5b1-o! 5 ~
_ :.a .~ a "a S ~
~al"C~.....~~~
~oo= Cd~~
::a 3 .oo~~
] .0 g..~ .;3 2
CJ :32 ] .5 '0 .~ ~
1-o50~=5b1:
.8 ~ "a ~ = .... c
e bQ ~ .";:!.o ~ U
o = en ~ c.. "C
.E 'C ~ "B ] "B .s
.- -S ~ = fIl
~ ~].g ~ 8.~
o ~ .s ~ ~ e .~
U~enCJ;;>c..::>,
O~
::t::~
fIl . e
::;I 0
0=0
.~ ~ 8.~fIl::t::
.a 0 "C Q3 .
.- e a J "8
.oCJO 00
rn = -g ._
::;I 8 ~ fIl
~ 00 -8
~ .~.g ~ en
....._fIl.otll
ClQ.ooe>'
8 ~.~ 0 i
8 ~ 'S> ~ e- :j
l~cS~:;
Q"CtIl8-8~
~"C.s "C~
c..;:;oa.8~
O:::lO(.ufll
~ ~ "C fIl.... ~
'N fIl tIl 5 la ~
.... ~ e c.] 4-4
:-:::l ~ tIS fIl 0
= .S.fIl e'fIl 8
.S t;J :s.s 0 S
o 0 ." -f"";:! a
CJ t;J .;:! '1;;1 ::;I ~
=0.B~C"i:l
e CJ 0 j:I:! (I)';:!
~oOlii~~
.... .;3 = 0 ~ 1-0
"C"C8~""'0
t;J 0 4-4 tIl 5 Cj:j
8ao~e~
fIlO~(I)l'9
~~~ '~19
~~oooc..o
"C 0 -"" .a..s::l c..
~1-o~~CJ~
o r:x:l .;3 tIl riS 1-0
.... I-o.~ 1-0 II) 0
t;J 3 ::>' CJ 4-40 .0
o ~ 0
::S. "C.....fIl"C
C" 0.B0;:;
5~5:::l~~
<<> CJPCJ;;>
00,=5 >..
1-0 "C 0 Cl ~ ~.
~~CJ8~U
~Q.~:32.;3.s
.g 05~~
a ~..s::l ~ -;::I ~
~5]~cfg
. g e g -;::I.g ~
::s!l)Ofllfll.,c:;
o~en:-:::lgt::
U c.. "a Sl C" tS
.
"C
~"C ]
j:I:! a 0 0
lii tIl..s::l ~
~0d'0
~ ;.9 a
o-=~~
::;I 0 '1;;1 .-
.~ 5 al ~
~~~8
-Eb ~fIl ~ e
::s.€ ~~
o U Q3 <.j;;j
.so.o~
00.;3 ~.9
]~s"a
~.~ 6 a
~::>' 0 0
.s,,,;:!]] ~
"C ar = en en
8 ~ .g 'i :s
of a e ~.s
,go~g.=
..s::l-tI;I-oO
00 ~.5 c..'+:l
'0 o' o.a
=.o.s.;3 0
o 0 1-0 ~
.;3 ..... arca 1-0
~"B~~~
= ~? .g>'€
got:tl::;ltS
.;:! ~ "Coo 00
~ 0 a.s'2
~.o Q,).s.o
"B:32::o;go
~ 5.;;;.~....~
'-..s::l fIl ::>'
een8.c..fIl
r:J...;3en3f1l
ft:g~~ g
o::>'CJa=
..s::l0~.....4-4
]] fIl ~:i
,SfIltllO:.s
fIlOfllc..e
~ ~ ,g .5 ~
j-a3.";:!]
I-oo::s~:do
o . "C 00'+:l
~.;3'0 ::;I:.a
~~~.s-g
"C
~tS
~"C
'.g:.a tIl
e~]
~"C-8
~ a .~ ....
i=8~
]~o~
'il ~ ~ g
a~8~
.!!l~CJQ,)
.~ I ~ l5
~ ~ e
~ "+!e
M Cd "C
fIl ~ ...e--
::;I 0::;1
oa"aO
'Io~~
CJ en 0
etll~
._ ~ ." M
.0 -=.;:! g
"Co.@o
tS ~8~
g~ g ~
"CCdfll,S
:.a~~en
~ fIl o.m
otll::t::t!
"a ~ . 8
~ 0 ~
fIl fIl'+:I ~
tIl >. ~
~~~~
o t;J 0 0
~ ~] ~
_"CfIlO
~8.s~
ct~~€
CJ~g8.
1-0 ~ c.. 0
.8:~}l
5:s~a
a I-o~ ::;I -=
:':l 0 "a 0
~ i.e.~
o 0 ~ 0
U..s::l~"O
~"B
:-9 .s
= Cd
e
a e
t; ~
8"a
-~
~ fIl
o ~
'+:l 1-0
:.a ~
-g ~
0]
-5 . ~
_~ 5
:.s'-ij
~ ;
.S ..s::l
] g
en rn
o~
~ 0
-c..
.S c.. .
:::l en
eUJ~
o "C 0
:> _ fIl
;;> :::l 0
fIl8-
-= .Q
o 0 tIl
"C..s::l0
.;;; fIl e
o ....~ 0
1-0 "a c..
.s -[.s
4-4~-=
:;rnQ,)
o ::;I 5
+-! 0 CJ
1;1 .~ 4-4
t::l .a 0
8.- ~
e.o~.o ~
~ .;3
'"' =
01-00
.o.s~
5 0
~~]
g'l: 0
:::l ~ Q
o Cd =8
U e
.
o fIl 0
-58.s00
~.~ 3'~
a .~ "C
~ ._ "d ~
~.oo~
._ rn -; ~
8 5 l:!: 0
en M FIi..s::l
~~~"C
fIl ::! ~ 8
.~ Cl ~ 0
.... 0 ',;:3
~.;3 ~
g~~&
.s ~~~
"C 00 = 0
.~ .~ 8 r;3 .
.... 0'" . 0
o 'S .~ ..... "a
s::: 0 e ! ~
"C....I-oliien
8;~0~
~]~.;393
~ .;;; ~.s 0
en.8lii~~
1:32~~.s
~::;I 0 0
fIl ~ . 00....
t.";:! ~ j ~
'1: en tIl tIl
Cl tIl rJ .:.:
~"a ~ ~
~ ~ 0 .Cd ~
o CJ')!I: a
8~~[e
~.S e ~ e
j]~.s~
cn~.s~s
:g ~.s ~ ~
\0 rn -= .";:! "H
C"ol:::lQ,)o-€S
H'~ [ ~ ~
-aen"C
<:.0 >'a.8
~~~~~
tS~:5~~
1-0
.... 0
. 0-""
=-~
'+=110 E cS
. la e
c..o
i>>-
o"'i::..g
1-001-0
.8.;3 c..
t::5~
tSen~
~ ~
e~_
'S 00 ~
g".m 0
~ l:.~
"Co:g
;:;.otll
O"C
~ a.H
.g.r ~
19 go CJ
O..s::l ....
.- fIl 5
rge.;3
.B O'~
-.... ::>'
tIl fIl >
o ~ ;;>
"C '+=1 ~
~81-o
4-40~
o ~ ~
~
.o"a-M
~.~ '1:
Cl .B c..
tIl 0 e
c..Q..
~ol~
~. ~
o 0
~ :::3
.;3 CI) '"
"Baa
+-! 00 ~
1;1 .g ~
~ ~ a
0.0 S
"" "C 0
r:x:l-~
::;I~ .
~_~~fi
.~~ :i ~
~cnae
1-0
ooca
.S en
~I-o
CJ ~
~ Q3
~]
-00
~oo 1-0
. 3
~
lo
e >
.€'i
U e
o 0
.;3~
>.~
.0
~]
~c5'
].s
j~
&.Q..
.s.s
l'~
la.;3
~'i
~ .S
o~
.- c..
lj ~
&0
~j
~ ~
.- >.
~~
~ o~
a"a
o ~
19
8..s
~ ~
1-0 0
~"a
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
October 11, 2004
Page 6 of6
plantings to be done in the out lot areas throughout the City, He stated he would not support additional
funding for plantings along the swale.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she believed tree replacement to be appropriate use of City funding;
however, she was not interested in seeing hedges or other plantings that could potentially obstruct the swale
planted as additional landscaping. She stated she thought it best to allow Staff to determine the appropriate
low vegetation to be utilized in the area and where best to place that vegetation.
Discussion ensued regarding the maintenance of snow removal for the swale. Engineer Brown noted City
streets would obviously need to take priority over this swale area.
Mayor Love thanked all parties involved for the efforts made in this matter. He stated he believed this case
to be a good discussion with outstanding conclusions.
Engineer Brown stated he would report back at the next Regular City Council meeting with a revised plan
for a swale as well as quotes for the smallest effective width swale to be placed in the City out lot.
.
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Construction Update
Administrator Dawson stated the bids for the County Road 19 Construction project would be opened on
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, with possible award of the project on October 25,2004, as part of the
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda.
B. Mayor & City Council
No additional reports were made by the Mayor and Council.
12.
ADJOURN
.
Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of October 11,
2004, at 8:26 P.M. Motion passed 3/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
Attest:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
,
PAYABLESAPPROVALS
For 10/25/04 Council Meeting
.
.
Date: /tJ--;;)/-OY"
Date: tolu;:;
Date: 10(21/01
_il.- -. ...-, A
-J:-+~ ..::)
PAYROLL APPROVALS
For 10/25/04 Council Meeting
.
Date: 10 -d I-C)f
Date:
Approved by:
Craig D
.M
Date:
IO~;;I
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
.
DATE:
October 21, 2004
RE: Authorization for Expenditure of Funds from the Municipal Water Fund
Southeast Water Tower - Inspection Services
The Southeast Area Water Tower, located near the intersection of Old Market Road and State Highway
7 is a 400,000 gallon elevated storage facility for the municipal water system. This tank was
constructed in 1988.
.
Standards for this type of tank indicate that routine inspections are to be completed every 5 years, with
a thorough engineering investigation to be completed every fifteen years. The contractor that
performed the previous power washing of the tower two years ago indicated that there were many
areas where the exterior coating of the tank were spalling and deteriorating. Therefore, Staff has
solicited proposals for performing interior and exterior inspections of the facility, to prepare a technical
report for restoration of the surfaces, and to perform cost estimates for proper restoration. Two firms
responded to the solicitations for this proposal.
Prior to presenting the proposals, it is necessary to discuss how advancements in the use of technology
have impacted this type of inspection reporting. .
Inspection of the exterior of the tank has remained constant over the years. Certified coatings
specialists and welding technicians scale the tower and inspect the exterior surfaces and appurtenances.
Inspection of the interior of the tank is more involved. The primary method used by many firms, until
recent years, has been what is known as the "float down method." Quite simply, a rubber raft and
divers (all disinfected) enter the tower when it is full. The water level of the tower is allowed to drop
at a controlled rate, as the divers investigate the interior of the tank, and document the interior of the
structure.
The "pros" of this type of inspection is the amount of detail and documentation available. With this
type of inspection, there are few surprises or change orders due to unforeseen conditions down the
road. In addition, paint samples are also obtained form the interior to determine what steps or contract
procedures are required to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) requirements while working
in or in the structure.
ft
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
=#3c
Mayor and City Council
SE Area Water Tower Proposal
October 21, 2004
Page 2 of2
~ y ...
The "cons" of this type of inspection are that an alternative source of water for fire protection will need
to be in place during this time. In this case, the City of Shorewood would request to utilize the inter-
connection to the City ofMinnetonka during the inspection process. Costs of this type of inspection
are considerably higher.
The alternative method of investigation is to utilize a remote underwater vehicle (ROV) equipped with
an underwater camera.
The pros of this type of inspection are cost and ease of performing this type of inspection. Attachment
1 is a picture of an ROV for this purpose. The tank can be left in service during the inspection.
The cons of this type of inspection are the detail or level of inspection obtained. The camera as it
swims around will not pick up all the coating bubbles, flaking or areas that are not evident due to the
water pressure pushing against the surface of the coating. .
Having stated the pros and cons of this type of inspection, several firms were solicited to perform
inspection services. Each firm was directed to document their method and associated costs of the
inspection. Two proposals, included as Attachments 2 and 3 to this report, were received, and are
summarized in Table 1 below.
Costs
$2225.00
$4,200.00
Table 1
Staff has spent a considerable amount of time researching the pros and cons of each method. While .
cost and simplicity of performing an ROV inspection is ~ appealing, Staff's research suggests that
the detail available in an underwater inspection versus an exposed surface inspection of a float down
often leads to unexpected and costly change orders once the restoration process has begun. Both firms
agree that the exposed surface will provide a more accurate inspection report. Therefore, it is Staff s
recommendation to perform the more detailed report and cost estimating on the front end of the
process, to insure that the necessary funds through bonding can be anticipated.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of the expenditure of funds from the Municipal Water Fund as
outlined in KLM's proposal for inspection services.
.
.
,.
The most frequently asked questions about KLM's
Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) Potable Water
Tank & Ground Storage Reservoir Inspections
1. Does the reservoir/tank:
owner need to do anything
in preparation for the
inspection?
2. Is there any possibility of
water contamination by the
ROV?
3. How much detail can be
viewed through the video
camera?
KLM Engineering, Inc.
NO! As opposed to dry or diver inspections, there is no preparation
required by the reservoir/tank: owner for a Seamor Rover inspection.
Unlike diver inspections (lock-out tag-out), the tank: stays on-line and
full of water. You do not need to isolate the tank:, which means no valve
turning, pumping or loss of pressure. There is no need for follow-up
bacteria testin or disinfectin .
NO! The Seamor Rover unit is constructed of inert high-density
plastics. Even the critical thruster bearing seals have been filled with a
food grade glycerin. The unit is disinfected before every inspection in
accordance with A WW A C652 using a 20Oppm+ chlorine solution on
all components that enter the water. Unlike with divers there is no
concern over medical records or dischar ed breathin air into the water.
The Seamor Rover is equipped with a 12: 1 macro zoom video camera,
which allows the inspector to zoom in and clearly view surface featUres
as small as 1/32 inch. The power wire-cleaning tool cleans off all
surface debris, corrosion products and failed coating, permitting the
ins ector to see its, cracks and weld corrosion.
YES? The digital video is able to capture any individual frame of the
color video and print those frames in high quality full color. The stills
are equal to a 35mm camera photo and are provided in the written
r ort. A full ex lanation of the ins ection video is included.
YES? The level of detail and surface coverage of the Seamor Rover
was equal to the diver method, but the Seamor Rover caused much less
turbidity than the diver. There is no danger to human life because the
ROV can stay immersed for several hours.
YES? When tanks are dark due to surface staining they absorb light.
When the tanks are dark they are difficult for both the divers and ROVs
to get wide shots. The Seamor Rover carries three high intensity
halogen lamps as opposed to one or two normally carried by divers.
This extra light allows for better wide views even in the darkest tanks.
The Seamor Rover is equipped with a I-lux camera that can operate in
natural light.
The Seamor Rover is equipped with a powerful wire brush-cleaning to
for removing surface corrosion. This device can fully expose all metal
pits and weld defects. The inspector can use a pit gauge to accurately
evaluate the size and depth of these pits. Ultrasonic method of
ins ection is also used.
YES? We simply attach a ruler that is viewed by the video camera and
the Tank Rover in the sediment for a measurement. As well, the type of
sediment can be determined by its color, for example: manganese, lime,
and floc.
9. What are the qualifications Our personnel are all highly qualified tank inspectors. Qualifications
of the ROV inspector? include various methods of inspection. They have the support backing
of a chief inspector that has NACE coating inspector qualifications and
over 12 years of tank inspection experience. The background of our
inspections includes protective coatings inspection, catholic protection
systems, non-destructive metal testing, and paint sampling and tank
erection.
The Seamor Rover camera rotates down 120 degrees, allowing for direct
inspection of the tank floor. If the floor has sediment on it we can use a
crawler mounted pump vacuum system with "pan-and-tilt" video system
to safely remove bottom sediment and ins ect the bottom.
The Seamor Rover can perform all of the critical inspection elements
required in the A WW A standard. Ultrasonic thickness measurements
and other testing can be performed. Adhesion testing is per ASTM
3359 and is not performed by the ROV because we do not recommend
damaging the interior coatings. Divers cannot perform this test in
accordance with the ASTM procedure. We do not do this test because
we never recommend spot prep and top coatings on the interior.
Adhesion measurements are done to assess a coating's ability to accept
additional coats of paint. This is routinely done on the exterior but
never done on the interior.
12. Other tasks using ROV that Anything the client requires, we will confirm the feasibility of
maybe ossible. erformin (exam Ie: retrieval, sampling, testing, etc.).
For additional questions please call KLM Engineering, Inc. Shawn Mulhern at 651-773-5111
4. Can still photographs be
provided of the internal
inspection?
5. Has the ROV inspection
ever been directly
compared with dry and
diver ins ections?
6. Can the ROV view larger
sections of the internal
surfaces?
7. How does the ROV
inspector assess metal loss
and pitting?
8. Can sediment depth be
measured?
10. Can the ROV operator
inspect the tank floor?
11. Are there any tests called
for in the AWWA D101
Tank Inspection Procedure
that cannot be performed
with the ROV?
.,
"
,
.
Mr Larry Brown
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
-----....
\:- ~
ItJ g ~
> ("-..I 0::
__ CD 0
UJ J:
(.) (j)
W ...J u...
~ => 0
...., ~
(.)
RECE,"EO
0(,\ - 1 LGG~
C\1V OF SHORE-WOOD
E)~~:~~~
July 1,2004
Dear Mr Brown:
.
I certainly appreciate you taking the time to visit with me and your interest in Liquid Engineering Corporation.
As we discussed, just a few of the many benefits to your utility from LEes unique programs include:
. No disinfection concerns
. No system down-time or wasted water
. No draining of your water tanks at any time
. Elimination of all tank maintenance scheduling hassles
. No interruption in service or loss of fire-fighting capacity
. No OSHA Confined Space headaches
. All at substantial cost savings
Based on our conversation, I have compiled pertinent information from our vast technical resources. I believe this
information represents the best solutions for the issues you are currently addressing.
.
For nearly fourteen years, LEC has provided cutting-edge solutions to the problems you face each and every day.
Our promise to you is quite simple: Guaranteed satisfaction, on time and on budget. Let us prove it to you. If
you do have any questions, of course, don't hesitate to give me a call at (800) 438-2187.
Thank you again for your interest.
Sincerely,
LIQUID ENGINEERING CORPORATION
, C/ri:5~
Chr~tena CQIIley ~
Operations Analyst
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT 2
7 East Airport Road. PO, Box 80230 Billings, MT 59108-0230.800-438-2187.406-651-0105. Fax, 406.651-0120
leclllaiK~!)liquidengineering.com . \l/Ww,liquidengineering,com
J\'\I'::f\.tnt:R Amcril;..n \'(I;ucr \X/orks ^",~~iatiun . National A..sod"tiof\ of COrTI>Slon En,.,.;m.'t.~n; . SOdC.lY 11)1" Prnu,'cti\,1..' Cn..ui"...os . Nilti.ur1011 Aso,ll(:i.itil.lll
u( J\'\ill~l1\,' Conu'octon. ;lnd Opt.'r.:lU)!'Tio . AInCrn.all \'(JI:,'ldinJ;: Srx:icty . A~su<.:'iiltiun of I )illiul-l Cnnu,\t'\/,r...
. A"stlCiilll()fl of (~I\t."fi,ll {:cmunt:ll.ll'!;.. Nallorwl Ruml \X'ater A!;~.t<.:lil(ll.n
. .
,July01;2004
'I
.
Larry Brown
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: Water Storage TankMaintenance
Dear Mr. Brown:
This letter is afollow-up to a phone conversation with our company. I certainly appreciate you taking the time to read this information
concerning Liquid Engineering Corporation (lEC). LEe is a "full turn key" operation for water systems. We have ~ a national
consultant/contractor providing services for water systems. Here are our main services:
1) Assessments, cleaning & repair-Potable Storage Tanks & OearweDs
2) Blasting & recoating (exterior and interior)
3) Warranty inspections
4) Cleaning, repair and inspections-Dams, Inlets and Rawwaterreservoirs
5) Construction of new storage tanks.
I have included a cost estimate proposal to conduct the Assessment and Cleaning to your Water Tanks. Please read the proposal over and.
ensure that it meets your requirements. If there were aneed for any sediment removal in the tank, the cleaning cost for each tank would be
determined by our Dive Maintenance Teams.
lECs Comprehensive Compliance Assessment (CCA) and Comprehensive Compliance Report (CCR) is the only inspection and the only
report ever needed for a storage facility. LEe takes all the NRWA, AWWA, OSHA, NFPA, and NEPA requirements into
consideration, when analyzing every aspect of the facility. All aspects of safety, health and if requested - even security are inspected,
analyzed and included in each report. Each storage facility will be inspected on the interior and the exterior, and even in proximity to
other potential hazards or problems. 1m Interior Assessment will be conduct In-Service; this will allow you to keep your system
on-line and the ability to keep your water storage capacity full. Every portion of the assessment is conducted by highly trained
professional teams and dedicated specialists. Our teams have over HXX> hours of water storage facilities training and typically assess over
1200 water storage facilities each year. 1EC also employs the latest advanced technology and equipment
1rereport is exhaustive documentation onevery consideration needed to bring the facility into absolute compliance with all of the above
agency's most recentrequirements, regulations, recommendations and standards. Further, the report is presented in afully illustrated
and concise format (video, photos and narrative). A CCR will show each discrepancy. It will describe the impact of that discrepancy on
the tank, the plant, water quality, and health and safety issues both immediately and in the future. Liquid Engineering's CCR(s) also
provide finely tuned pricing (in a line-item format) on the costs to replace, repair, remove, or modify every discrepancy. lECs CCR can
prioritize maintenance and repair schedules according to criticality. A CCR is a crucial aid for calculating future O&M budgets, and
targeting expenditures to deliver the most value for the least expense. .
Along with the cost estimate proposal I have include some information on our company. If you would like we could have your tanks
scheduled with our next available team, PlEASE sign the second page of the proposal and fax it back to rreor mail it to the address at the
bottom of this letter. Our teams are expected to be in the State late April/early May. 1HANK YOU for allowing rre the opportunity
to work with you and your system and I look forward to working with you. If you have any questions please contact rreat the nwnbers
below or view our website at www.liquidengineering.com.
Christena Conley
O~tions Analyst
LIquid Engineering Corporation
800-438-2187
Fax: 406-651-0120
www.liquidengineering.com
,
.
.
iI8...... . ".LIC=~~II:>
~. ENGTN~ci
. (:; (J p, P () f(, ,\ T' ~ (J '~,~
Page 1 of 3
For Office Use Only:
23909
M146/0129/MF-0
[Ref # 13063]
Fax- (406) 651-0120
Scope of Work - In-Service Assessment
This Potable Water System Proposal is made this date, by and between City of Shorewood of the state of
Minnesota, (hereinafter "Client") and Liquid Engineering Corporation, of Billings, MT, (hereinafter "LEC"). LEC
will provide all labor, specialty equipment and insurance to professionally evaluate your facilities.
In-Service Assessment
Interior and exterior assessments will review structural, sanitary, safety, security and any installed coating
conditions. Reporting will be provided based on water tank inspection criteria, referencing applicable OSHA, EPA,
AWWA and NFPA requirements. Minimum items examined will include ladders, shell, roof, vent, manways, welds,
seams, foundation, anchors, safety systems, hatches, external overflow and plumbing.
Underwater interior video documentation will be completed with real-time closed circuit high-resolution color
underwater video equipment. All pertinent findings will be recorded on VHS format videotape (including dive
maintenance technician's findings and narrative summary).
Services will include a detailed video and photo documentation of the potable water tank(s) / clearwell(s) described
on the Costing Breakdown attached. Discounted multi-tank pricing is provided for combinations of two or more
tanks completed as a single dispatch.
Underwater Ooerations - All Dive Maintenance Technicians and associated in-tank equipment are fully disinfected
in accordance with AWWA Standard C652-02. All system entries will be conducted in accordance with applicable
OSHA regulations pertaining to Diving and Confined Space; including 1910.401 thru 1910.441. Specialty
equipment may include but is not limited to; appropriate OSHA climbing and personal fall protection, AWWA and
ADC approved commercial diving equipment dedicated to in-service potable water operations.
In-Service Cleaning
NOTE: For proper documentation of the interior floor, LEC recommends removal of sediment prior to assessment.
In-service removal of accumulated bottom sediment is accomplished using LEC's proprietary HydroDyne™
cleaning equipment. Normal cleaning prices provided include removal of sediment accumulations up to the first inch
(1") in depth or cubic yards given on costing breakout.1 Material that cannot be vacuumed with LEC's HydroDyne TM
(e.g., concrete, gravel, misc. materials or compact sediment requiring hand nozzling), is considered debris.
Cleaning includes up to one hour of debris removal per tank at no additional charge.2
For normal cleaning operations client shall make available an approved discharge location (sewer, cofferdam, etc.)
within 450' of the reservoir access hatch. (Site-specific discharge recommendations can be provided by LEC upon
request).
Deliverable - Prioritization Schedule
The deliverable provided on site will consist of LEC's checklists, summary recommendations and Immediate Needs
Assessment™, which documents discrepancies that require urgent action, and is supplemented by the interior VHS
documentation.
Within approximately 30 to 45 days of completion of the on site work, LEC's bound report will be delivered. This
follow up documentation will include a comprehensive listing of all discrepancies found, with corresponding photos
and recommendations provided by LEC's specialists. Any cost estimates provided are estimated based on services
provided by LEC and its specialists. If requested, reports can be signed and stamped by a licensed professional
engineer.
Cl Copyright 2003 Uquld Engineering Corporation. AU Rights Reserved
;'8"" . .LI<-~~LJII:>
ENGIN'EERING
. .' c c " ,. ,., '>. " , , " N
pag~ 2 of 3
.
Assumptions _ Based upon information obtained via the systems interview conducted for your facility, the following
assumptions were made. Should conditions vary from those stated, additional charges could apply.
Prior to arrival, and during underwater operations, water level in tanks/clearwells to remain ful1.3
Client's Point-of-Contact will be available for access, as well as authorization of any additional requested work.
Facilities are accessible with LEC's standard truck/trailer combo (overall length - Crew Cab = 23' I Trailer = 22,}.4
Access into tanks/clearwells are sufficient for man entry (i.e. 24" dia), with no obstructions in the hatchway.
Exterior assessments will be performed from the ground, installed ladders, and exterior roof while utilizing
installed ANSI & OSHA-certified personal fall protection equipment, without additional scaffolding or rigging.
There are no special discharge requirements (Le.long distances I permits).
For Assessments Only - to avoid additional setup, any requested cleaning will be authorized prior to diver entry.
Miscellaneous
All services provided by LEC will be completed in a professional workmanlike manner according to the Terms and
Conditions of this Proposal. Any alteration or deviation from the Terms and Conditions of this Proposal, or .
additional services, involving additional costs, will be completed only upon written authorization by Client or Client's
Authorized Representative.
This Proposal is contingent upon weather, delays or other matters beyond LEC's control. Client will carry fire,
tornado, and other necessary insurance. LEC will provide all other required insurance coverage, including, but not
limited to, General Liability, Employer Liability and Workmen's Compensation Insurance during all operations
(certificate of insurance available upon request).
This Proposal, when executed by both parties, shall constitute a binding agreement between the parties. The
persons signing on behalf of Client and LEC hereby represent and certify that they are fully empowered to bind the
respective parties to this Contract. Client acknowledges that payment is due and payable Net 30 upon completion
of on site work. A finance charge on past-due accounts is computed at a periodic rate of 1.5% per month, which is
an annual percentage rate of 18% applied to past due accounts.
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
LIQUID ENGINEERING CORPORATION
P.O. Box 80230
Billings, MT 59108
(800) 438-2187
.
Accepted & Agreed per Costing Breakdown - Page 3
Attached Hereto and by Reference Included Here Under
By:
By:
h) e,tJ~ - Will Dell
Its:
Date:
Its:
Date:
Contracts Specialist
June 30, 2004
Note: This proposal may be withdrawn if not accepted within 90 days from the above LEe signature date.
Cl Copyright 2003 Uquld Engineering Corporation. All Rights Reserved
.
.
Cleaning
price per
,,!<Ink __
N/A
Cubic
Yards
Given
-~---_."",
N1A
Page 3 of3
Initial to
accept
Cleanln
N1A
LIO!:::lII:>
ENGINEER,ING
,""J P;' F fj i~. /\ r ! <__:) r"~.
Costina Breakout
Pricing above does not include Local, State or Franchise Taxes - if any.
Terms: Net 30 Upon Completion of On Site Work. A finance charge on past-due accounts is computed at a periodic rate of 1.5% per month, which is an
annual percentage rate of 18% applied to past due accounts.
I!nk
Dimensions
Scope of Work Requested
Individual
Pricing
Capacity
Im!
No.1
400,000
steel - elevated
$ 2.225.00
Assessment & Reporting
150' to the top
- Costing Totals -
Total Price for Assessment & Reporting
$ 2,225.00
(Prior written approval will be obtainedfrom Client's Authorized Representative/or rmy additional charges outside the Scope described herein).
I. Bottom sediment in excess of one inch or cubic yards stated above will be removed at $38.00 per cubic yard.
2. Debris removal in excess of one hour per tank will be charged at a rate of $425.00 per hour
3. Unscheduled delays, which are a direct result of the utility's obligations (i.e. access and water level), may incur standby charges.
4. Access requiring portable set-up (i.e. truck only), will incur an additional setup/tear-down charge.
@ Copyright 2003 Uquld Engineering Corporation. Ail Rights Reserved
RECOMMENDED CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS
FOR POTABLE WATER DIVING OPERATIONS \
These recommendations provide
recognized standards, which have been
compiled from the following sources
. These specifications incorporate the AWWA
Standard for Disinfection of Water Storage
. Facilities, C6S2-02
. Association of Diving Contractors -
Consensus Standards
. Federal OSHA - Cornmercial Diving
Regulations
. Standard.swhich are specified by
numerous consulting engineering firms and
municipalities who routinely contract for
potable water diving services.
~ ~I~!:;~~~
Recommended Specifications
1. All diving operations will be conducted by certified commercial divers
who have graduated from an ACDE Approved Commercial Diving
Course. Alternatively, divers who have completed specialized military
training Le., Navy 1st or 2nd Class Dive Courses or Master Dive
School shall also qualify.
2. All diving operations shall be conducted with surface-supplied
commercial grade diving equipment, including compressor (or
compressed air bottle storage system), volume tank, air control
system, filter system and pneumofathometer. The air spurce shall
have been tested, within the past 180 days, for oil mist and other
contarninants, in accordance with 29 CFR.
3. Alrdiving operations shall be conducted utilizing a totally
E.1~Gapsulated divi~g. dress, inclu~ing diver hard hat with seale? .n.
dam, and a dry SUIt In good repair. A band mask shall be prohlblte I
>for any but an emergency situation.
4; The diver hard hat shall be equipped with operating voice communication
to the surface, and the diver umbilical shall consist of at a minimum, the
following: Diver air hose, pneumofathometer, diver communication cable,
video cable and high intensity lighting power cable.
5. The dive team shall consist of no less than a three person team
(Diver, Tender & Dive Supervisor), all of whom shall be certified
commercial divers. All team members shall have a current CPR
& First Aid Card, as well as a complete diver physical within the
previous 12 months.
6. All diver equipment and any other equipment introduced into the .
reservoir shall be dedicated for potable water operations, and furt
shall be disinfected with no less than a 200ppm chlorine scrub/spray
prior to entry into the reservoir.
7. Underwater welding is not permitted in potable water reservoirs
unless the reservoir is isolated from the system and the water is
drained to waste following the welding procedures.
8. Dive contractor shall have available for examination, the following
documentation: Copy of Standards and Procedures Manual, Safe
Practices Manual, Diver Logbooks and the latest Air Testing Reports.
9. Dive team shall be equipped with live color video with live voice
recording (and associated lighting system) between diver and surface
team, to allow for real-time surface monitoring of all diving activities
and findings, as well as quality-control of the completed work.
10. Contractor security protocols shall include mandatory identity, drug
and criminal background checks of all field employees prior to, and
routinely re-investigated during, employment.
800-438-2187 ' WWW.L1ClJ.IIDENGINEUUNG.COM . (/;)2004 ALL RIGIITS RESERVED,
. LEC SERVICES - CLEANING
Liquid Engineering crews are equipped to access on-
site, any type of storage facility
Whether it is an on-grade, below-grade, clearwell, stand pipe or
tower, Liquid Engineering's cleaning process utilizes the proprietary
HydroDyne Cleaning System exclusively, for the cleaning of potable
water storage reservoirs. This system will remove flocculated
material, silt, sediment, sand and any other debris from the floor of
your reservoir.
Nodown.. time or loss of storage capacity
You continue topurnp water and operate your system in a norrnal
manner during all cleaning procedures. It is not necessary to drain
yourreservoir,incuradditional personnel and equipment costs,
meet increasingly stringent OSHA regulations, or provide costly and
time"consumingdecontamination procedures prior to returning your
. reservoirto service.
,
lOur reservoir is never taken out of service!
LEC SERVICES - LEAK DETECTION & REPAIR
All leak and coating repairs meet or exceed
ANSI/AWWA and BPA recommendations
utilizing approved procedures and products meeting the
. latest NSF 60/61 Standards (approved for use in potable
water). Finally, by employing the unique HydroDyne
Cleaning System during all repair procedures, the possible
circulation of rust, scale, or paint debris in your water, or
any increase in turbidity, is prevented.
CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY.
COMPLETE &CONSISTENT SERVICE.
UNSURPASSED VALUE.
THAT'S LEC.
~ ~I~ ;~~~
Liquid Engineering's dive maintenance
technicians are highly trained
and experienced in all phases of repair of your on-line
water storage reservoir. Because your reservoir remains
full of water, we can immediately pinpoint any leaks using
food-grade dyes. The following repairs can be performed
with your reservoir in normal operation:
· On-the-spot identification and repair of all water leaks
· Repair/modify/replace existing plumbing and valves
· Replace water level sensors/floats & wiring
· Move, adjust or install/replace water inlets, outlets or
ovetilows
· Repair damaged interior coatings or areas of non-structural
rusting and pitting
· Perform repairs on non-structural leaks in wood, hypalon,
steel and concrete reservoirs
· Install, modify, or repair baffle systems, liners and floating
covers
SOO--13S-2187 . WWW.L1o.!-.IDFNGINEERING.COM . <02004 ALL RIGI-ITS RI'SFRVFD.
\!J
gnm r
... oz ~
; ~~ Pc
~ -;~ ~
~~~ 0
z
[)
-
z
~
In
)'
z
c,
h
o
$:
e
tJ
C
C
Lo
:::
)'
c
.,.
...
\.Ii
7'
7'
<
:J
CD
::J
CO
S'
CD
CD
~,
::J
CO
(I)
CD
<
0'
CD
(I)
--
o
:3
CD
CD
--
'-c::
o
c::
.....
-t3
CD
C")
3-i
C")
::J
CD
CD
~
CD p
<5 (I)
S' III
CD
CD
Cri
III
::J
0...
(I)
OJ
~
0-
0...
CD
(ii
.g
cu
~
~
o
:::t.
0...
(I)
o
C
g:
::J
.0
~
CD
C")
III
::J
III
(i)
o
-0
a
-.:::
g:
C")
o
::J
(I)
~
s'
co
~
o
~
co
Q..
r
m
()
C/)-
~
o
3
~
PJ C/) CD <::::;_.
en cO' C") ~
o ::;) :::r -'
co ~ 6 ~,
=20(0
g 2. ~ (0 r
C/)~-'<m
o-~~~()
3 m ~ ~ C/)-
CO C/) ~ 0 C/)
~ co C/) ~ Dr
S. PJ '< -
< -. <p
C") ~ CO 0
co (0 C/) ...
o..C/)c-
(ii' - ;:::;= :::rco
...... 0 C/)
c,<~d>
-g. 0 ::+
0' c
::;) 0-
C/) C
-
CD 0.. ~
C/) (ii' ;::;:
CD S' :::r
...... - 0..
~. ~~.
C/) S' ~
(0 S'
PJ(O
~ -
0..C'
CD g}
:=n S'
-. (0
~ -
(0-0
'< c:::
o 3
~ -g,
~
(0
;! ~. ..~
~ ~ ..~
~~ CD ~ ~~ ~~~Es..~~
:::r So !":!L co () -g -0 9: g s" ~ ~ ~
PJ PJ n: 5' C/)o ~C/) ~ g' ~ 0.. ~ ~. ~
C/) !::!" <' (0 _ _, ~ ~ c::: m'" "" f\ii
~gC/)co-a5a5!::!'.PJ-'~ ;:~
o~C/) C/) PJ =m(O ... ~
PJ - (j) _ 0 ,<(0 CO S' ~ ~
~ PJ -r- PJ :::r PJ 0.. ..~ = ~ ~ ~
C/) .... - CD =I:: PJ-' 3 ~ ....
C") ~ :t> m -0 Q.. 3.,;g :::I, ... ""
o CD C") - -. 0.. .. ~ S' ::;) ..;:
*" '" 0 PJ g. S' ~o ~ ~- j' ~
PJ en ~ ~ CO ~ S':: ~ 3 ""'I;S
~ CO ~" -" 3 :t> (0 .~ ~ PJ ~:t
..... ~ 0 0.. PJ ::;'... .... .
g 3' --- Q ...... 0.. ::;) ~..J .. ""
;;::" ::;' e:!, co ;::;: o...~ CD CD ~ ;:
...... ..J -. PJ o' - co ~ ... ~
1[ ~ {g 5' ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~
t5PJ(o = _QC") ....
C") -< ':< 0" co ....
co ~ ~.
-
o
'<
o
c:::
-.
co s'.g
< Q co
CD co -.
enPJ~
I C/) -,
o>cog
Q S' C/)
a: '< C")
g $2 CD
-~PJ
C") ~ CD
g PJ PJ
C/)-~ ~
o.:~'<
CO-3C:::~
P3~co~g;
!::!'. 0- PJ co
g Q; ~ ~ 0'
-<P3<::::;)
o-PJ
CD~
5'
~
::J
o
_CD
g 0- c: Q.. CD PJ S. ::5 0.. cO' g 03 ~ ~
-0 =..g PJ C") 0 3 g: $: :::r 3 '-'.
PJ < _, = Q ::E :. 0 ,~ en co c::: PJ ::;)
g: co 0.. -0 0.. C/)...... ....... -. ~ -. (0
_:=j' ::5. m (3 ":-. '< CD ~ :::r 0- ffi 5' C/) C")
"<::; coo.. ,;g 0 ~ 0 -, C/) co 0 (0 -i co
(ii' _0 ~, ~ C' c:::' ~ CD 3 c::: PJ :::r :::r PJ
PJ..J 0- -g 3 m. ...... ~ cO' (ii' 2,
C/) c.u ~ ~ 9: :::r PJ -0" CD CJ1 :::r -. ~
O CJ1 -. co ::;) '" ...... --' C") C> -. C/) (0
3 ::;. (/) (0 ......;::;: ---, :::r co
..J < '< ~ :::r ::;) c> C/) PJ ::i"
~ 3 ~ 8 <' co C") 0.: (ii' 0' ~ 0 8 C/)
~. C/) co 3 co PJ 0 CO C") ffi' PJ c::: 0 -0
PJ:2":0>-o<8aC/)o~:::::g3~
Q: -0 3 CD ~. 3 (3 ~ ~ C/)- c ::;)~. g
9>:::r CD co -0 ;: ~ 0.. C") ~ C") g}. ::;)
o ~ 0.. -. CD c::: 0 Q. ~ CO 0 co C/)
o-PJo-COCD-~O'~Oo..PJ
(0 fr'< 8 < PJ'< c::: 3 PJ -. o-~
P3 -' '< -. -. en ::f - CD - < '< 0..
-0 !::!" 0 9: CDo.. 0 co ...... CD ;::;'
::roc:::::;) C")-'---
'< ~ -. (0 0 ffi' ~
~
~ g ~ ~
:::r~C/):t
0.. ::;< c: ~ .
<' :i: ~ ;:
CO PJ COO ~
3 ~ ~
5' 0.. ~ ~
_ CD -0 "'i
CO ~ ~
~ <9. -g ~
o>~::+~
~~CD~
co -. 0> ....
CD~3~
C")3_f.o)
:::r 0 PJ ....
~ ~ C/) ....
0' ;::;: c:: ""t
-, 0 c:: f\ii
PJ -. CD ~
::;)C/)=~
PJ ~
C/) ;:
....
~
~
~
~
~
~
:::r
eo
r-
15'
c::
a.:
~
CO
s'
CD
CD
5'
CO
(")
o
-a
o
iiJ
--
0'
::J
-0
Cti
CD'
Cri
~
o
*
s'
CO
~
S
'-c::
o
c::
......
!":!L C") CD m. ~ (ii' jg
~ ~ ~:i ~,-8'
CD a 5: 3';::;: g 3
CD ~ ~ coO> >0_... ~
C/) o' C/) C/) en
~~PJ:t>og6
<_~C/)PJ-.-
Q, N 0.. ~ 0 - 0
-'C>PJ~~~~
Q .g ~ ::r C/) :::r '<
~OCO~~CD
= '-' C") -. --- 0' ~
~ 3 -' -0 g -' C/)
co + PJ...... PJ c:::
?'-;;1[~o-~CD
::!:CO$l~=:-~
g. -g o' a5 ~ *
~ -6' :: - '<
(J) 3 a :E 0
o co 3 0 c:::
c::: a C") :i: -.
-0-' PJ 0 PJ
-'::;)'<
~ co _ _'
-0 0.. 0> <
...... co 3 co
o. C") -, <
-. 0 ~ Q.
0" ~ g' 2
~ 2. ~ 8
$~PJ3
~ 3
~ co r c:::
oo..m~
'< ::E () o'
0;::;:0..
c::: ::r <' ~
-. PJ CD 0
-o::r3~
g, to' PJ ~,
PJ :::r S' ::f
0- -
co ~::f
~ 0> co
PJ ~ 3
_ C")
CD CD
-.
s=-
(n'
III
:.......
III
(I)
c::
0-
(I)
fit
::J
~
C")
o
(I)
--
~
-.:::
~'
0-
a
!==
C") 0.. 0>
o -< CD
3C/)_
3 c 0
CD;::;:Dr
o :E =
ffi" ::r '<
0' ~
o...:::r C")
<,' ",
CD (ii'-5
-. 3 C/)
C/)- PJ So
:::rCD~
~ 0.. co
0.._0..
:::r 0 -,
PJ PJ ~
:-'"C/)PJ
-iCDC/)
:::rPJill
(ii' 8.. CD
0..
(I)
c::
-t3
CD
::J
Q
-g
:3
-0
S'
<Q
III
.......
.11)
~..
::J-
III
(ii
0-
0..
CD
~.
III
CD
.....
.--a
c::
.....
Cti
C/)
CD
~
.;:;~
III
::J
0...
S'
::J
o
~
~
.g
CD
iiJ
&
;:s
. .0::.
c::
g.
::J
o
--
III
cu
C")
o
::J
@-
C")
CD
0...
~
s:
:a
c::
.....
~
CD
~
"".
C'
=
-0
a
-0
~.
OJ
-<
CD
..Q
c::
-0'
:3
~
:-+
-0
a
@
@-
Cti
_(I)
III
::J
0...
-t3
CD
C")
iii'
~
CD
::J
(Q
5'
CD
CD
cu
0...
-0
a
co
iiJ
:3
a:
~
rn
:::r
<0'
::J-
~
iif
s'
CD
0...:;1
~ (n'
0...
r-
~
(1)-
c::
::J
..0'
c::
CD
-0
o
OJ
0-
eo
~
CD
......
(I)
0-
iiJ
co
CD
--
~r
-ct?
11)
::J 0
0... .....
11)
=
o
-
g C5 0- @
;. ~ ~ 2:
-. C/) Q ~
< '< ;><;'(0
co C/)
3CDgg
0>3,<0'
S' _ 0 -.
CDa~~
~ 3C/) ~
~ (').(ii '<
2gCDPJ
-Dr3CD
~ 3 . ..0
:::r -" c;i c:::
~ ~ PJ
o' ~ -0 =
;;::. 0' a ="CD'
...... - -
~ ..J co 0..
C/) $l
p
=
-0
a
C")
<l>
@-
cu
(I)
~
~
CD
~,
;:,
C")
CD
0...
C")
o
:3
:3
CD
(=3
a[
9-
(ii'
.0
-0
a
~
li)
::J
::>:;-
:3
III
S'
CD
::J
III
::J
C")
CD
-0
a
co
iiJ
~
...... (') -0 ' CD C/)
@ ~fjjg g.~
<' m' 0" ~ 6 ~
CD 0.. -. -0 0 cp
!:Q, C") -< co (0 C/)
x 0 $:0..'<-5
3 3 (){g~-o
o 3 :t> 0 C/) m"
a~C")::+C")o..
~ Q. ~ 9: ~ ~"
oPJ:::;';<-o-'
- 0.. m' ~ 0> PJ
{g <' 0.. f CD ~
CD co 0.. CD 0..0..
C") C/) <" cO - <_.
ffi' -g ~.: 0 co
-. C") C/) (j) -.
N _' - Z ".... C/)
co PJ' :t>....1
0.. (ii' 0 c: C:-5
_c:-CD-o
C/) -. - :t> 0
:4
III
::J
0...
.g
CD
iiJ
--
o'
::J
~
-0
a
C")
CD
@-
~
~
(I)
C")
~
0=
CD
:;I
CD
0'
5"
~
s'
co
:3
III
S'
CD
::J
11)
::J
C")
CD
(I)
OJ
::J
2-
a.
(I)
~~
~ ""'"
~~~
:2":~
F::r ~. ~
co ~ ~.
C/) ~ ~
~ ~~
0> ~ ....
~~;:
- ~
!":!L ;:
~ ~
<p ;:
~ ~
h
~ ~
d> ~
::+ ;:
~.
~.
;:
f.o)
~
~
~
9
Iij
Q
~
~
l
C/J
~
z
a
>
b
C/J
~
o
i-Q
t'T1
~
~
o
z
>
~
i-Q
b
n
t'T1
o
c:
~
C/J
~LEC SERVICES
: The'LiquiJEngineering assessment
program
is und~rtaken with your reservoir or clearwell
filled with water and in normal operation.
All procedures and techniques have been
developed, tested and proven to meet the unique
requirements of the potable water industry.
All water reservoirs receive detailed
underwater inspection to the following
standards:
· Pitting depth testing to 5 mils accuracy
· Weld evaluation to American Welding Society
- ANSIIAWSB1.11~88
· Coating evaluatiorito,SteerStructUteS Painting
Council c ANSIISSPC-Vis2-821 ASTM-061 0-85
· COrrosion evaluation to National Association of
. CorrosionEngineers;ASMINACE RP0178-91A,B,C
, · Concrete evaluation to American Concrete
Institute; ACI 201. 1R-92
Upon request, LEe technicians can also
conduct the following underwater tests:
· Leak detection, analysis and remediation
· Ultrasonic metal thickness testing (e,g., floor
thickness) to 5 mils acc(jracy
· Presence or absence of lead
· Paint mil thickness testing (OFT) to ASTM 01186
· Interior coating adhesion analysis to (modified)
ASTM 03359-92(a)
· Important note: If a thorough and complete
. " inspection is desired of welds, joints, gaskets and
coating (steel floors), or for cracking, spalling,
etc. (concrete floors), the reservoir floor must
be clean-unless there is only a superficial film
present. [The majority of significant coating failure
& leaks are found in the floor]
LEC SERVICES
From initial design, through
construction, training and operations,
LEe provides a unique range of
engineering services tailored to your
specific needs.
~ :;I~:',~
ASSESSMENT
Detailed Assessments Include:
· Interior roof, wall & floor
· Columns and floor plates
· Floor-to-wall joints and gaskets
· Water level sensors & associated wiring
· Overall general appearance and condition of interior walls and floors
· Floor seams, welds/bolted joints and the integrity of any previous repairs
· All structural members as well as inlet/outlet, vents & screens, ovetilow systems, drains,
bolted and welded connections, ladders, hatches & scuttles, and any other interior plumbing
· A random measurement and tally of bottom sediment as well as a bid to remove all bottom
silt/sediment, if requested
Interior Assessment
The interior conditions are inspected for peeling, blistering or other indications of
a loss of coating integrity. Any areas of pitting or rust, as well as any associated
undercutting or migration, will be documented and noted on the video record,
pictures andreports. LEG technicians can also perform a variety of destructive
and non-destructive tests. If a cathodic protection system is installed, LEG dive
maintenance technicians will visually examine the condition of anodes, cables and
wiring for indications of operational condition (e.g., appearance and color of rust,
holid~ys,erosion and presence/absence of any deposits).
Exterior Assessment
The exterior is inspected for safety, vulnerability, structural and coating integrity.
This inspection takes into consideration the requirements and recommendations of
NRWA, AWWA, OSHA, NFPA, NEPA and other state specific requirements.
Comprehensive Reports Include:
· Digital photos of all discrepancies and maintenance problems identified during the
assessment of your tank.
· Detailed cost analysis of recommendation, repair, or rehabilitation of all identified
discrepancies or problems. This includes a narrative summary of all said issues.
· Regulatory compliance reference binder that explains the standards and regulations
associated with each of the identified discrepancies.
~rranty (} Acceptance Inspections are an LEC Specialty
If you have recently completed constr(Jction or repainting of the interior of your tank, we
can undertake a complete interior inspection without de-watering or disrupting service to
your customers in any way. You will then have a detailed third - party interior inspection and
video of the interior coating or completed construction, while you are still covered by the
contractor's warranty!
ENGINEERING
Structural, Civil and Environmental Engineering Services
We couple innovative solutions with professional project experience. LEG engineers
work with you in performing analysis and developing flexible designs which will
exceed regulatory standards.
Our licensed P.E.'s can perform a structural engineering survey of your water
tanks for a fraction of the normal cost. LEG's engineering survey provides valuable
information if you are concerned about your reservoir's structural integrity, or you are
developing a long-term budget plan. Surveys are prepared using the live inspection
video, digital still photos and detailed reports (NACE, AWS, SSPG and/or AGI)
completed by our dive maintenance technicians. When undertaken in conjunction
with your tank cleaning, your utility will save thousands of dollars.
800-438-2187 . WWW.L1C"liJIDENGINEERING.COM . rD2004 ALL RICI'ITS ItESUtVED.
,J . . Ii
LEC SERVICES - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
.
A
,.'!
~:;~~:.~
800-438-2187 . WWW.L1Q1JIDENGINEERING.COM . <b:>2004 ALL 1"tIGHTS RESERVED.
'~
, ~
" ~';' '"q:r~~~:';:,;, r.;.'.,.,"
KLMENGINEERING, INC.
fE'~ ["" f-' p~ . \ t.. l,,,RDPBOX 897 · 3394 Lake ElIIlo Ave, N..~ Lake Elmo, ~ 55042 .
."1 eVe: ~ Ii;; t: .'(6~1') 773~5111. Fax (651) 773-5222
~
June 22, 2004
J';"",j n t:) "r'~'l
\"',j ~ i~ r;iJ LJiJlt
Bv Fax & US Mail
Mr. Dave Hutton, P.E.
. " WSB & 'Associates, Inc.
"4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
WSB& ASSOCIATES
. '
RE: Proposal for Inspection of the 400~OOO-Gallon Single ,Pedestal ~o~ated :mihe
City of Shorewood, MN.
. . Dear Mr. Hutton:
KLM is pleased to submit this proposal to inspecfthe 400,000-gallon elevated water
tower in Shorewood, Minnesota.KLM proposes to perform a detailedins~eCtion of the '
existing conditions of this elevated water tower in conformance witl;1 A V(.W A ~tial '
M42 Appendix C Inspecting and Repairing Steel Water Tanks, and ElevaiedTariks for
Water Storage. This type of inspection is not just a clean out' and 'verbalreport on existing
. ,conditions. The report submitted 8.fter the inspection will break down in detail the i~teii.or . ,
and exterior Coating arid structUral conditions. Color photographs substantiate the, detauS
'of ibis 'report. . TheKLM report will also 'indicate any unsafeC)SHA; condjtions observed .
. and includes testing the existing' coa~gs for lead and chroinium content in confoimance"
, with current Minnesota P.ollution Control AgeIlcy (MPCA) Requirements., The report
closes wtth an Engineer"s Cost Estimate ofthe'reconnnended structUral and coating
repairs or replacements, which is 'essential for adequate budgeti~g.' .,.,.
."
By choosing KLM Engineeiirig, Inc. WSB & Associates is investing in the knowledge and'
, expertise ofa consultant who can ,perform" an accurate and unbiased inspection of your
water tank. KLM' sknowledge and experience in the field of water tower structural
examination and coating evaluation can be confirmed by checking our enclosed references.
Our inspection will clearly identify all of the maintenance requirements of the tower; thus '
allowing these requirements to be included in the future proposed reconditioning
specifications.
The experience ofKLM's staff in water tower inspecti<:>n has been enhanced by our
training as National, Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) , Certified Coatings
Inspectors and American Welding Society (AWS) Certified Welding Inspectors. This
training, plus the years of experience in abrasive blasting (surface preparation) painting,
rigging, welding, and inspecting, has given this company a competitive edge for '
performing this type of work in a safe and professional manner. ' A TT A CHMENT 3
\
~
City of Shorewood, MN
2
....
-,
The following, ,excerpt from A WW A MANUAL OJ:i' WATER SUPPLY PRACTICES
M42 Steel Water, Storage Tanks defuies organizations or individuals deemed properly
qualified to perform the type of inspection., proposed by KLME~gineering" IIlc~
.AWWA Manual M42 Appendix ~ Inspecting and RepairingSteel'WaterTa~ks;
and Elevated Tanks for Water Storage (formerly A WWA Standar(l D101)
, Section A~l: GeneraL ' '
Sec. A- 1,2, Inspection Services _
Under the terms of this recommended practice document,' inspection service shall be'
provided only by organizations or individuals who are properly qualified to do such work, ,
'Those so qualified are: ' .. ' .'
(1) ,An engineering organization whose principals are registered professional
engineers, specializing in inspection service and having at least five year's experience, in
the inspection of steel structures.' ,
(2) Independent engineers, licensed in the state,~ which the structure'is, ,
, , located, whose practice has included substantial or major attention to steel construction.
(3) "Inspection or safety agencles of the state in which the strUcture is located,
if such agencies are empowered to render inspect~6n serVice and, further, if such,
-' inspecuon services ,involve the employment ofpe~sonnel.experienced in steel constrUction
, and maintenance. ' , :' " ., ",
.
.' "
, .
In all of the above classes of qu8Iified inspection agendes, the, inspector or inspect,ors ,
, ,assigned to the workin the field shall have been properly trained by theorganiz,ation so '
qualified and shall have no interest, other thaD..that of a competent inspector, in the- , '
,performance of any work under consideration at the.time the inspection is ma~e.
',--,.
) ,
City of Shorewood, MN '
3
'.
.
Benefits
KLM will provi~e to the Owner.two (2) copies of the inspectiOIi report, 'which will
provide the following benefits:',' '..', ,
'1. Clearly stating the actual' condition or'the"coatings '~d structuralintegrlti. , ,
2. Provide laboratory analysis of the lead and chromium content of the coatings to
determine compliance with Federal, State and loc~ environmental regu1a~()ns..
3. Provide a schedule for performiilg recommended maintenance, work., '
4. Provide 'an Engineer's Cost Estimate for all'recommended repair,work.. ,
5. Color photographs'Substantiate details of the report. '" ' ,
6. Copies of the report justify maintenance recommendations to decision-makers.
7.' ,The inspection report can be included in the specification document to provide
accurate information on existing conditions for bidders.
,8. Antenna installation recommendations.
9., Recommendation of future inspections.
10: KLM will also provide drawings in the ,report for future ~aintenance. '
,KLM Work Plan
, . '
'Inspection Evaluation for Steel Water StoraeiReser.voirs.
. ",
,Floatdownlnspection
.'
The floatdown inspection is KLM's most frequently used aIid most comprehensive '
,. ,inspection. This method ofinspectionprovides the inspector/engineer with more
inf<:>rmation than the other typ,es of inspecti~n.
,', KLM will provide NACE Certified Coating,Inspectors, with one or both of these
individuals being an AWS welding inspector, whom are properlytrainedand qualifieci,'to
perform this type of inspection. KLM proposes to perfonii our standard "float-down" of ,
, the water tower. If the water tower can be drained in a single day (8 hours), this will,
enable the tower to be inspected, cleaned and disinfe~ed in a.one~day ,inspection.
In order to perform a complete float-down inspection,' the owner must have the water at'
.or near the high water level (HWL) at the start of the inspection. KLM inspectors will
. insert and inflate a sterilized rubber raft into the tank interior. During the float inspection, .
the owner will be responsible for opening and closing the valves to the tower. The
: inspectors will notify the owner personnel when to start draining the tank and at what rate.
,The inspector, while in the raft, will examine the interior structure and evaluate the '
, existing coating integrity. KLM will inspect the roof, roof structure, all appurtenances '
t'
'City of Shorewood, MN
4
'.
'such as vents, manways ,and ladders; the tank shell, and the bowl. ,KLM will be .'
, responsible to provide ~. safety ladder and a lifeline in the roof manway, for the, interior
inspector, at all times. The inlet ,pipe or wet riser is exclll:dedfr<?~ the inspection, unless '
, otherWise written into this agreement. '
:
Coating sampl~ will be taken from the interior and exterior inconfOlmance:with,
requirements of the state of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, State Rules ,".
,Chapter 7025, Removal of Lead Paint fr:-om Steel Structures 'and per ASTM D3335.' , '
, ,
, ' ,
, The inspection and mspection reports will be performed in accordance with A WW AM 42
Inspecting and Repairing Steel Water Tanks, Standpipes, Reservoirs, and Elevated Tanks
for Water Storage; American: Concrete Insntute (ACI) 201.1R-95 Guide for Making a .,
Condition Survey of Concrete in Service and this proposal, ' .
, ' KLM Engi~eering, IDc can also perform the following types of inspection. They' are '
not included as part of this proposal '
.
", 'Dive Inspection:
R.O. V. Inspection:
.:.
" '
,'Drv Tank Inspection'
Exterior, Inspection ,,_ ,
The ext~rior inspection is critical for evaluating the coatingconditjonS to determine'..'
whether the coating,. is a candidate for over,coating or complete reconditioning.' KLM' "
inspectors will also check for stru~al deficiencies and OSHA compUance,
For each insp~Ction, KLM will provide a NACE certified Coatings lnspectorthat is
properly trained and qualified to perform this type of inspection. The exterior will be
, inspected from all areas accessible without rigging unless otherwise written into this
agreement. 'The inspection and inspection reports will be performed in accordance with
AWWA M 42 Inspecting and Repairing Steel Water Tanks, Standpipes, Reservoirs, and
Elevated Tanks, for Water Storage and American Concrete Institute (,^CI) 201.1R-95 ,
Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in Service. The exterior inspector's
primary responsibilities are to be the safety hole watch for the interior inspector and to
, inspect the exterior.
.'
Prior to climbing the tower KLM and the owner will meet to discuss any safety concerns
and exchange phone numbers of all emergency personnel,
~ City of Shorewood, MN
5 .
Owner's Responsibilities .' . .. . , .
KLM will require the assistance of the owner to 'back flush and disinfect. the rese~()ir of . '
, the tank. The OWJ;ler would need to provici~l;i supi>IY~fwater. and hoses to perform this. .
.' disinfectiOn. A typical C1e~ ou:t cqnsists of washing down most: of the heayy sedimen~
while the water is draining.' .
.
The owner's personnel s~ also be responsible for'
. Manning the shut. off valve at all.times.
. Opening and closing the inIetlo~tlet pipe.. '. .
. Verifying that clean .out and dis~ection have been performed to pwner's
satisfaction.
. Disposing of sediment and debris.
. Taking and.testing water sampl~s. .
. Providing copies of background informa;tion .on t~ including maintenance
records, construction drawings, previqus inspection reports and p~evious pai:nting
or reconditioning specifications.' It isespeci~y:helpfu1if this information .is
. ,collected prior to KLM's personnel begins 'its inspec:tion~
'j
Inspection Fees . . .' . .' .
. The inspection wi~ beperformedinaccordanc~,with this' proposal: for a fee Qf$4,200.90..
,.
. '."
'Iffor some reason beyond KLM'scontrol, die inspectionofthe'taDk cannot b'e.perforined .
in one day, and KLM must return for a ~ecC?nd day to complete the inspection, the' cost of.
.' a ~econd.day of inspection would be $1;2()0.QO. KLM canrep~~ce;theeXlsting manway ....
gasket( s) for a $75.00 .fee per gasket. -T~~..that have excess sediment and require more
than one hour of cleaning time may result in eXtra charges above and beyond the original
'contract amount, Fees are subject to change if proposed work exceeds 12 months from ,
,this bid proposal. . .
.-
. The clean out and disinfection will be penormed in accc;>rdance'to the proposal. Clean put'
~an be performed usjng a 3000~psi pressure ~asher ifnecessary~ .KIM will rinse out any"
sediment from the bowl ifnecessary. KLM'will supply a sump pump and pressure relief .
valve for the owner ifneeded for the clean out of the wet riser. 'KLM will disinfect the
tank in accordance with Method 1, 2, or 3 of AWWA C652-92.' KLM will require the
, . assistance of the owner.to back flush and disinfect the reservoir of the. tank. KLM can,
supply the chlorine and do the clean out of the bottom.
City of Shorewood, MN
6
.;
, fi!!i ect Team
'. riM En2ineerin2" Inc. 'Team Members
'. Proje~ Manager: Jack R 'Kollmer
. Project Engineer: Matt,C. Erickson, P;E. '
, . ,Marketing Manager: Shawn A Mulhern
'. Marketing Sales ~sociate:, T~sha A Schell ,,'
. Project Field Superviso~: Kelly C. M~ern ,
. , Field Inspectors:, RodneyJ.Ellis
, Patrick A. Thronson
Bryon 1. JenSen
Cole M. Iverson
.'
. "
Term.s and Conditions,', '. ' "," " , " .,..
KLM has attac~ed our standard, Terms anti Conditions. The attached t~and
Con~tions are part of this ,agreement'between \WSB & A$sociates:and ,KLM Engineering,'"
" ,Inc. unless otherwise agreed to ~ writingbyboth. parties: ' " ' ,
, : .
. ~',
,)
, References , . ' ' , ' , " ' ,
: KLM encourages WSB & Associates to call any or all of the references provided~ ,
. . . .
. " .
'.'..
. City of Shorewood, MN
7'
Time Frame , ' ' ,
.. " .This proposal is valid, for sixty (60) days. IfWSB& 'Associates finds this proposal
acceptable, please sign and r~tw1l., When .Iq..M receives the signed proposal, we will call.' ,
. the owner to coordinate an inspection time. When WSB' & Associates r~ceivestP.e
.. inspection report, KLM Win bilI'the Owner according to this agreement. '.'
If you have any. questions regarding this proposal, please call me, at '651-773 -5111 or fax '
this proposal back at 651-773-5222,. ' '
This agreeID;ent, between WSB & ~sociates and KIM Engineering, Inc. ~fLake Elmo, ,'"
Minnesota is accepted by: .
.
" (Name)
(Title)
WSB & Associates,
. 'Minneapolis, Minnesota.
....\'
(Date) ,
, ~ ~
,~M Engineering, ,Inc. '. .
Lake Elmo, MinIiesota '
.
; .
... S)K\J-;~~if
. (Da:~e) ,
, We look forward to working with you. ' .
Sincerely,
KLM ENGINEERJ,NG, INC.
Shawn A Mulhern
: Marketing Manager
,CC: Marketing File\Proposal File
Enclosure: KLM Terms and Conditions
KLM Fee Schedule
Insurance Certificate.
Project Team Resumes
KLM References .
MPCA Removal of Lead Paint from Steel Structures
T AS c: Win Proposa12004 City ofShorewood, MN
"
I'
~
.
".'
..
. .
0. E' 5' - t:': ~ ' S' 5' g ~ as '90 g- 'I:I:-.J .,' Ii P' g'g ~,~ ~ .... s: 9 ~:f'o' e:s!l: a ~ ~ ~. ~,
8 c; <? ~ 0 .., Gt !:";s ., 0 .Q. 0 ? , 0 'l'of1 Ii '8.0' . &:l, 0 q , Ii. , "3'" Q. O. Q
~ h' ~ ~. ~ !r ~ ~. 9 ~,~ ~ 'li~ ~;= ;l. t 'i U H! 1 i H~~ ~ ~t Sl ~ ~
llh~ ~~ lH:ta~Hi!: ~f~6H~I" i~~ih. Hl~\;io'i:fIJ"'~' f.m.
p ~ ~ W CD g ~ ~ ~'a~ S!., ... a 8 ' f i ,',m &'~.t/.: ' ~.~ 1 ~ ~:t.~: Ila ,....i,.8:f. 'I'~' 8 ~ ~ ~
ffii~"~ ,[,~ ~..Ji'~.oiP I~~ ,t's'i.~' ~',~f.,,'i',"'~ll"l'~i"~ ':~i~'5i:'. :'~ [{g. .as
~ ~ Q ~ ! ~ ~. f i ij ~'if. ! ~ ~ 'F 0''''. e ! a: r ~ "~ ~ ,eo e j i1' !-, 8' ~ i i ~ ..2: ... ~ R' .
~!Ii~ i~ hJi': ~i' nh. kh~hl[ld J'Il~iDl~:! lliit. .
e ~ ~ tEl R- a ~ :. c; - ~ ~;1' is. IP a.I,a I- ..,~ ~ !;"i i~ (' 5i go I'D =~'.i"l'm ~" ~i
t~i~~! dHJ ~li l!~ilt! 'dri~d ;i,f~h. li~... iil~
l ~~~?jg (;.8.,&,a'; ~l'R", ,!.e.~ ~, er1o'!., ~'g..~,t, 'f,I., ";;[lS-ffi'~ ~i i~ '~s:
::I VI 2. '~* !. 0 5 S. ,. 0 it' aa ," I..lf a..f l!II t ' 0 ,.(1 c; 0 2, I. lit ~ 51 a g. ! I' ~ e' t:. [2.;. {n~.
U!~ if ~ihm fHf-U~Ht.fU;.f!r '.I~ll;lfU ~t .j!U
o s.liii' 5;1- J!.tP~ !!If i 'Il, 8~ WP ~ f t Il.lJ5 r~ . .' l ~ If!~ h: Ifl .~~.
Iii g h I~~li '::h. ilH~~{iJfd~iI~ ~1""l'~I"'lilit~! It '8~ .
~ ~ B. ~ :~i' S" Ji ~f' ~.~ t ~,.i . ~i i:S.' .!.;. J',~, ~ I9 i: :~'l:l.i ,~. Er' 'i'~ ii' ,i 1:"lP" .It ~ (1
Cil~~N ~e ~i, ~flJ. 2.~'~ ..-~ '8'!;st..l ",g.S'k.:, 'if " ,5 i,'-gs. .o! ,.if
I:~.~i ~! '~fli'fi ,i~'~,!." 'I,'i~~ ' ~:~'l'~"'!'J'..ij':!f'I,'" t~JtI:,!:f"E.,:t'Ii""'~'i, '.
(JQ _. ~ ~ '8::s 1:1-, 1:1 n n 'li' .D' er Ii ~ .k"8 f.I i ~ rJ. ~. ' E: r"'I. .... u. is "". R- - Ii [
Q ~ ~ a: ::s ~ ! &"~I 'I;"" 'Sa ~,i5. 11'" L" .' g. :2i,'~ i " ,j;" .;,,8;k: ,<< '0: ~
ntl Jt. nu . ~lh~!J-'I5<l~'t~I~'~lh "!hl~tI lIlt.
(1l < '0'" ... S nOS!, ~.~ g OS a. . fR.. ":II . . ~' 4;).., :;"1, ~ f4, ~ I ~ -IW a So ~
Jl ~. a 'R . ~ ~. ~ ; ~ if ~ " i .f Sf i ",. , ~' u '. i ~t;f~ $P 'j ~ ~: "i f.' ~ 'I, 'fa'"
'[ g F5 [ ~ ~ 3: B.~,.i 5:., " i B:'. ~ ,~' .., ,'~II "'~I,~i,i l,Jl' ..:1; f'".;. fT
~ (1 I ~ 0 ~ 0 n, .i' . 0 = . K ..... fl' E: !:!1 ,a ~ , i....., f, ~ !1
~ ~ 2. z Ei, I" ~ ' " ~ iii ISo f/> $I 'f I .8 " ' .,
~ JA jJ , ii"':. . ..
n
. , ' , " " '
, payments will bCat -interesta,t 1.5 P?~t per ~onth if CLIENT .is a business 'entity and attlae lcP1-
of interest of ~e stilte in whi~ the project is located if ~NTis a co~er. If any invoia; ~
,unpaid.tot.6O chys, su~,non-pa.rJr.1ent shall be a 'material:breaCh Of~. ~~nt. As a ~.rL such
~te.-lal breach, KLM may, at its.sole option, suspe;nd 'all ,duties to the Client or Other persOns; ~
li3bility~' Client will pay aU KLM collection expenses and attomey.'fees relating to past ~e'reC:s.-laicIa the
CliCJrt owes uilder this a~ment. '
. ;;.'.
, ,
11. MUfUAL lNDijMNIf'iCA1l0N; Except ~ to ~tters ~ covered by iiIswance ~by
KLM. ,KLM agrees 'brhold hannless and i'n~ CI.,IENT from and agai~ fiaPility ansu.g oat,o(
KLM's ~gligeqt per!Oimance of the wolk, ~jec;t to:any Jimitat~i1s, 0thCr' in~~tiQ~. 01' otbc:r
provisio~ CLIENT and KLM ._ve agreed to in wrl~~g. ~ as to m3ttets actuaUr Q)~ by
inSlil'ance ~ by CLIENT. CLIENT ,agrees to hold hannICS$ and,~.KLM ~~ aDd
apnst liability 8ri$.ing out of CLIENT',S negligent' con4uct. su.bjecpo. any limitations, other
m~iDJiificati9i1s ~'Q~ 'proVisionS CLI1:U'fl' _ KLM haVe agh:ed to, -
12., ~rMrr~nON bF LIABn.riY. ~. agrees to limit ~s1~itytO CLIENT ~~
, ~onal actS, en:oJ;.S' oi.omissi~s, suah.that.~ biKall;l~~ liabilitY of,Kt:l\.:f'dpes 'Jiot ~
IQ.Ms ptoject feC$ e1tCCpl as to.matters actually COVered by ~.~ ~.IQ..M.
13.. DELAYS. ifKUvl work delays ~'caused by client, ~ 9f ~ Strikes. ~ ~uses.
weathet. or Qtber- it~ms btyend KLM's eontrol,a reaSQilablc, time,extcDsion for peri'orJnanoe of'wodr; sha1i
be Sr;l..ted,:and KLM..shall'rceeivc ,an equitab1~ fee ;tclj~ent. ' ' .
14. nlRMJNA nON. After 7. days wnttcA ~c*., ~~'party tIlaY e1cc:t to ~te wtirlc ,tOr
-..jtistitiablt~on6. In this event, thci'~~' ~ pay for au wodt peIforme:d. inc1\lding ~D
and. reporWi& ~ to ~J1lp1ete the file pfoject,~, fCPOI1s ,to a..IENt. ' '
.. . I .' . .:.. . '" '. .
1'5., SBVERABiLlTY. ~ prcniisions ~~ ~ ~ ~ld to'~Olate a law:or,re~tio. shall be '
, decined,void, ancl all re;p;aining provisionS l5baIl ~ ill force. 'H6Wever, q.mNr and K.1.M 'Will.in '
gQOd~tb a~eroPt;tc),~ aD.invalid,oi' ~ble J?fD.visiou. withOQCfthat. i$ ~id and~e,
and w~C.h GPIneS as a1~ as poSsil?J.c.to ~~~g the intent of tile orj8i~ ~. . .'
.
.
. . .'
16. ~'S DOCUMBNTS. A1J. reports, specifications, drawi:n8.' aM othu,doaunents ~ by KLM
arepaJ:.i ofK'.Ut.~ semces to CLIENT tor use only for ~ ~anclKLM r.etai~ ~ O~of sam
documeIlts regardl~ of~~her tile projea is completed. ' GLIBNTmay retain ~es.for~, in '
co~on with the' use and ~q oftbC'pr!)jcit; bqtl<LM ~ DOt. rePresent ~ the ~ ate
, sui~ foi .reuSc: on exieJaSion of the, .p-oject or on ,Qther, pi'Oject$. CL~ ant:t others' $~ ~_the
~ts on othetpiojects or eXt~ons oftlUs project~c;ept by KLM's wnttenllgreenient. clIENT,
wiUderend,and,iildemnify KLM from all claims or Ipsses ariSing out of the unauthorized use of the
docume$. .' '. . .
. .
17. 'ARBlTRAOON. Any controversy or clainifor mpney damages arising oUt of or relating to the
makilig or performance or iIlteq;relation Of this AGREaMBNT~ or ~ breath of this AGREEMENT,
$ball be settled by arbitration in ~ce with ~ Construction Ind;ustry. Arbitration Rules ot the
American Arbitration Association. The ar\litration pan~ sball consist of three 8Ibitrators, at least one of
whom isa structurtllengineer, and the panel may :award oDly mOnq' danuJges and shall, not aWard ,
ecJ.uitabl~ '~lief. 1ud&ment npon lhe arbitration award may be entered in any oo\Ut havingju,risdiction of
the parties. The enforceability of this arbitration provision and arbitration awards'will be gQYtmed by the
Federal Arbitration Act.
--..:..'"
18. ARBITRATION FEES. The prevailing party to any disptlte arising out ofthis AGREEMENT shall
be entitled ~o recover its reasonable fees and,costs from the other party.
C:\winword'lTenns &. CllrId., proposal
. ".,,:.... "\,,-,,,\. .....
" ...
KLM E1VGINEERING, INC.'
P.O. Box 897 . 3394 Lake Elmo Ave. N. . Lake Elmo, MN 55042
(651) 773-5111 . Fax (651) 773-5222
KLM ENGINEERING, INC.
FEE SCHEDULE
Principal Associate
Engineering
Project Manager/Supervisor
Field Inspectors - CWI/NACE
Field Inspectors - NACE I & II
Drafting
Clerical
$85.00 per hour
$80.00 per hour
$75.00 per hour
$70.00 per hour
$65.00 per hour
$55.00 per hour
$45.00 per hour
.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The following expenses are reimbursable to KLM Engineering, Inc.:
1. Travel time billed at the labor rates listed above or as contracted.
2. Vehicle mileage billed at $0.45 per mile.
3. Daily Per Diem billed at $75.00 per calendar day or as contracted.
4. Projected related expenses such as on-site vehicle, rental equipment and
subcontractor or sub consultants billed at actual cost plus 5%.
5. Production supplies, duplicating, delivery, wireless communication and
Facsimile exp~nses will be billed at the actual costs incurred, no mark-up.
.
Effective Date January 2, 2004 -
C:\winword\manual\feesched.doc
Revised: 1/2/04
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE (MMlDDIYYYY;
KLMEN-l 04 22 03
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MA TTEROF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
PROD !:,CER
RJ .Ahmann COUlpany
7555 Market Place Drive
Eden Pra.irie MN 55344
phone:952-947-9700 Fax:952-947-9793
INSURED
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
KLM Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 897
Lake Elmo MN 55042
COVERAGES
INSURER A:
INSURER B:
INSURER C:
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Hartford Underwriters Ins.
American Home Assurance Co.
Cont~ental Casual Co.
NAIC#
19682
THe: POUCIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BelOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDmON OF AKV CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDmONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID ClAIMS. DATEIMMID~
LTR NSRI lYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER DATE MMmDNVi" UMITS
GeNERAL UABIUlY EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000
1--.
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 41SBANB2966 03/01/03 03/01/04 ' PREMISES (Ea accurencel $300,000
I ClAIMS MADE ~ OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000
~ Per Proj ect Aqgre PERSONAL & ADV INJURY sl.000,000
GENERAL AGGREGATE s2,000,000
GEN1.AGGREGATE LIMIT APPlIES PER: PRODUCTS. COMP/OP AGG S 2.000,000
I POLICY /Xl ~8r n LOC
AUTOMOBILE LlABlUTY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT sl,OOO,OOO
- 41UECTX8686 03/01/03 03/01/04 (Ea accldenl) .. -
B ~ NlYAUTO
,
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
- (Per person) S
SCHEDULED AUTOS
I-;- . .
.~ 'ijIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
(Per accident) S
~ NON-OWNED AUTOS
-- PROPERTY DAMAGE S
(Per IICCidenl)
GARAGEUA8ILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT . S
==i ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC S
AUTO ONLY: AGG $
,
EXCESSlUMBRELLA UABlLITY EACH OCCURRENCE S 10 000,000
A ~ OCCUR .:0 CLAIMS MADE 41SBAN.82966; . 03/01/Q3' 03/01/04 .i'GGREGATE S 10,000,000
S
~ DEDUCTIBLE S
X RETENTION no 000 $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND X ITORYLlMITS I xlu~R'"
C EMPLOYERS' UABIUTY WC51B-49-40 03/01/03 03/01/04 EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 500 ,000
ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERJEXECUTIVE
OFFICERlMEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L DISEASE. EA EMPLOYEE $ 500.000
If ~' describe under E.L DISEASE. POlICY LIMIT S 500,000
S eCIAl PROVISIONS below
OTHER
D Profess.i.ona1 L.i.ab MCA254055195 04/01/03 04/01/04 1,000,000 Oc.c/Aggr
Claim.s Made 15,000 Deductible
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
"Evidence of Coverage"
CANCELLATION
BLANK - 2 SHOULD At('( OF THE ABove DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRA no~
DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAlL _ DAYS WRITTEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAlLU~ TO DO SO SHALL
IMPOSE NO OSlIGA TlON OR UABlLrN OF ANY KIND UPON;mE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR
REPRESENT A TlVES.
AUTHO ENT
ORPORATION 198
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
.
.
2002 KLM Reference List
KLM 2002 Reconditionin2 Proiects
City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa
1111 Shaver Road North East
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402-4593
Bruce Jacobs
(319) 286-5913
Fax: (319) 286-5911
KLM Project No. MNl167 - E Avenue
KLM Project No. MN1360 - Blairs Ferry
Inspection Services During Renovation
.
City of Edina
4801 West 5th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394
Wayne Boule, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director
(952) 826-0443
Fax: (952) 826-0390
KLM Project No. MN1733
City of Edina
500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower Inspection During Reconditioning
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
Owners Representative:
Advanced Engineering
2016 Washington Street South
Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201
Wayne Gerszewski, Civil I Environmental "Engineer
(701) 746-8087
Fax: (701) 746-0370.
.
KLM Project No. MN1580 (Viking Tower)
City of Grand Forks "
500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower Inspection During Reconditioning
City of Lanesboro
P.O. Box 333
Lanesboro, Minnesota 55949-0333
Barbara Hoyhtya, City Administrator
(507) 467-3722
Fax: (507) 467-2557
KLM Project No. MN1212
~'. : . ", \
. '. ~ 1"
City of Lanesboro
ISO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower Inspection During Reconditioning
City of Maple Grove
9401 Fernbrook Lane North
P.O. Box n80
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311-1180
Terry Muller, P.E., Assistant City Engineer"
(763) 494-6353
Fax (763) 494-6418
.
KLM Project No. MNl721
City of Maple Grove
2,OOO,OOO-Gallon Hydropillar Inspection During Reconditioning
Owatonna Public Utilities
208 South Walnut
P.O. Box 800
Owatonna, Minnesota 55060
Myron Volker
(507) 451-2480
Fax: (507) 451-4940
KLM Project No. MNI002
City of Owatonna
500,OOO-Gasllon Elevated Water Tower (Academy Street)
Inspection During Reconditioning
.
City of Plymouth
14900 23rd Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dan Faulkner, Director of Public Works
(763) 509-5520
Fax: (763) 509-5510
KLM Project No. MN744
City of Plymouth
1,OOO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower Inspection During Reconditioning
University of Minnesota
Rosemount Research Center
154325 Babcock Avenue
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Pete Klotz
(651) 423-1118
Fax: (651) 423-4710
KLMProjectNo. MN1734
University of Minnesota
50,OOO-Gallon Inspection DuriiJ.g Reconditioning at Rosemount Research Center
KLM 2002 Industrial Proiects
5 In 1 Dam
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Customer Representative:
Barr Engineering Company
4700 West 77. Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, Minnesota 5543S-4803
Tor Hansen, P.E.
(952) 832-2600
Fax: (952-832-2601
.
KLM Project No. MN1529
City of Cedar Rapids" Iowa
Inspection During Reconditioning of the 5 In 1 Dam
KLM 2002 New Tank Construction
Alexandria Light and Power
Alexandria, Minnesota
Owners Representative:
Widseth Smith Nolting and Associates
610 Filmore Street
Alexandria, Minnesota 56308
Tim Schoonhaven, P .E.
(320) 762-8149
Fax: (320) 762-0263
.
KLM Project No. MN1868
750,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction and coatings
City of Brooten
Owners Representative:
Widseth Smith Nolting and Associates
610 Filmore Street
Alexandria, Minnesota 56308
DaD Folsom, P.E.
(320) 762-8149
Fax: (320) 762-0263
KLM Project No. MN1601
150,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, engineering and inspection services on new tank
City of Cambridge
.~" tt'r
..
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik and Associates
2335 West Highway 36
Sto Paul, Minnesota 55113
Mark Rolfs, P oEo
(651) 636-4600
Fax: (651) 636-1311
KLM Project no. MN1869
500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
.
City of Chaska
Owners Representative
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik and Associates .
2335 West Highway 36
Sto Paul, Minnesota 55113
Mark Rolfs, P oE.
(651) 636-4600
Fax: (651) 636-1311
KLM Project No. MN1870
1,500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
.
City of Cloquet
1307 Cloquet Ave.
Cloquet, Minnesota
Jim Prusak
(218) 879-6758
Fax: (218) 879-6555
KLM Project No. MN1900
1 ,OOO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
City of Coon Rapids
Owners Representative:
Howard R. Green Company
1326 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Chris Catlin, P.Eo
(651) 644-4389
Fax: (651) 644-9446
KLM Project No. MN1878
2,SOO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
Elk River Municipal Utilities
322 King Avenue"
Eik River, Minnesota 55330-1900
.... -
. .
.,....
~' .
,.
(763) 441-2020
Fax: (763) 441-8099
KLM Project No. MN1820
1 ,500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
City of Ribbing
Owners Representative:
Progressive Consulting Engineers
6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 629
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430-2123
Naeem Qureshi, P .E.
(763) 560-9133
Fax: (763) 560-0333
.
KLM Project No. MN1726
1,OOO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction
Hope Water and Light Commission
P.O. Box 2020
Hope, Arkansas 71802-2020
Leslie Patterson, P.E.
(870) 777-3000
KLM Project No. MN1881
1,OOO,OOO-Gallon Single Pedestal Steel Water Spheroid Elevated Water Tower,
inspection during new construction.
.
Joint Powers Water Board
St. Michael, Minnesota
Owners Representative:
Howard R. Green Company
1326 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Chris Catlin, P.E.
(651) 644-4389
Fax: (651) 644-9446
KLM Project No. MN1725
Inspection during construction and coatings of a ISO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
North Kittson Rural Water System
Lake Bronson Minnesota
Owners Representative:
Widseth Smith Nolting and Associates
216 South Main
P.o. Box 458
,....___1._.__ ....~__...__J.._ I!!'i'~..,
. '.
Mike LaFrance
(218) 281-6522
Fax: (218) 281-6545
..
KLM Project No. MN1926
I50,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower, inspection during new construction and coatings
.
KLM 2002 Phase I Existinl! Tank Evaluation I Inspection (Floatdown)
Village of DeForest
306 DeForest Street
P.O. Box 510
DeForest, Minnesota 53532-6751
Bert Caverson
(608) 846-6963
Fax: (608) 846-6963
KLM Project No. MN1890
Floatdown of a 600,OOO-Gallon Single Pedestal Elevated Water Tower
City of Eveleth
413 Pierce Street
Eveleth, Minnesota 55734
Mike..Wiskow, Director of Public Works
(218) 744-4329
KLM Project No. MN1969
Floatdown of a 200,OOO-Gallon Single Pedestal
.
City of Robbinsdale
4100 Lakeview Avenue North
Robbinsdale, Minnesota 55422-2280
Richard McCoy, P .E.
(763) 537-4534
Fax: (763) 537-7344
KLM Project No. MN1908
Floatdown of a 150,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
KLM Project No. MN1909
Floatdown of a 750,OOO-Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir
KLM Project No. MN1910
Floatdown of a 500,OOO-Gallon round Storage Reservoir
2001 KLM Reference List
KLM 2001 Reconditionint: Proiects
AhGwabChing Center
PO Box 40
AhGwahChing, Minnesota 56430-0120
Mr. Pat Bauer, Center Maintenance Manager
(218) 547-8442
Fax: (218) 547-8328,
Owner's Representative:
Division of State Building Construction
G-I0 Administration Bldg., 50 Sherburne Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1402
Peter Paulson, AlA
(651) 296-8808
Fax: (651)296-7650
.
KLM Project No. MN1208
City of Ah Gwah Ching
100,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tower Inspection During Reconditioning
City of Coon Rapids'
183111lth Avenue NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55433-3761
Dick Dwyer, Utilities Supervisor
(763)767-6576
Fax: (763)767-6540
.
KLM Project No. :MN1680
City of Coon Rapids
5,500,000-Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir Inspection During Reconditioning
KLM Project No.:MN1610
City of Coon Rapids
5,000,000 Gallon Concrete Ground Storage Reservoir Receiving New Dome
City of New Trier
8540 240th Street East
New Trier, Minnesota 55031-8724
Kathy Fritz, Mayor
(651) 437-8262
Cell (651) 235~3975
. ..
KLM Project No. MN1745
30,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing and Painting.
City of St. Peter
405 West St. Julien Street
St. Peter, Minnesota 56082
Mr. Pete Moulton, DirectoJ:' of Public Works
(507) 931-4840
Fax: (507) 931-1358
KLM Project l\IIN1669
500,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing and Painting.
.
City of Virginia.
618 2nd Street South
PO Box 1048
Virginia, Minnesota 55792
Michael Pelletier, Steam, Water and Gas Manager
(218) 748-7540
Fax: (218) 748-7544
KLM Project No. MN1253
5QO~OOa-Gallon Water Storage Tank. Rehabilitation
KLM 2001 Industrial Proiects
Inspection for the 2001 Fuel System Extension for
Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport, Boiler Fueling System UST's
.
Owner's Representative
POND & Company
7206 Beasley Road
Tampa, Florida 33615
Mr. Bruce Kelley, PE
(813) 243-8414
Fax: (813)243-5795
Doing Shop Inspection for the following Contractors on the above project:
Minnesota Petroleum Service
7650 State Highway 65NE
Fridley. l\1N 554-32-3553
Baard Lovaas
(763) 780-5191
Fax: (763) 780-5472
Poling & Bacon Construction Co., Inc.
10400 South Avenue
PO Box 5500
Youngstown, Ohio 44514
'- ..
James Bacon
(330) 549-3917
Fa": (330) 549-3910
.
Lannon Tank
20134 W. Main Street
POBox 516
Lannon, Wisconsin 53046
Ken Stowell
(262) 251-7890
Fax: (262) 251-0484
Staten Construction, Inc. dba National Piping Contractors
PO Box 34275
Indianapolis, IN 46234
Lynn Persinger
(317) 388-9276
Fax: (317) 299-0036
.
KIM 2001 New Tank Construction
Rosemount, Minnesota
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510
Owner's Rep:
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates
2335 W. Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Mr. Mark Rolfs, PE
(651) 636-4600
.
KLM Project No. MN1683
Inspection Services during Construction of 500,000-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
City of Osceola, Wisconsin
Owner's Rep:
Howard R. Green Company
1326 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Randy Surbaugh, P.E.
(651) 644-4389
KLM Project No. MN1716
Inspection Services during Construction and Painting of500,000-Gallon Water Tower.
Onamia, Minnesota
Owner's Rep:
BODestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates ....
2335 W. Highway 36
. .
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Mr. Mark Rolfs, P.E.
(651) 636-4600
..
KLMProjectNo. Iv1N1755
Inspection Services during Construction and P~inting of 150,OOO-Gallon Water Tower
.
Brooten, Minnesota
Owner's Rep:
. Widseth Smith N otting
.0 iIO""Centiaf AveiiueoN'cirtii
PO Box 81
Brooten, Minnesota 56316-0081
Dan Folsom, P.E.
(320) 762-8149
KLM Project No. MN1609
Inspection Services during Construction and Painting of 150,OOO-Gallon Water Tower
KLM 2001 Phase I.. Existin2 Tank EvaluationlInspection (FIoatdown)
.
City of Edina
43Q.l West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works
Jerry Hershey, Utilities Superintendent
(952) 927-8861
Fax: (952)826-0390
KLM Project No. M:N1733
Floatdowri of the 500,000-Gallon Elevated Storage Reservoir
City of Owatonoa
208 S. Walnut Avenue
PO Box 800
Owatonna, MN 55060
. Myron Volker
(507) 451-2480
Fax: (507)451-4940
KLM Project No. :MN1542
Floatdown of750,000-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
City of Fennimore
PO Box 17
Fennimore, Wisconsin 5380
Greg Lee
(608) 822-6119
... .
KLM Project No. :M:N1738
Floatdown of 100,OOO-Gallon Single Pedestal Elevated Water Tower
City of Cottage Grove
8635 W. Point Douglas Road South
Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016
Harold Taylor, Public Utilities Foreman
(651) 458-2837
KLM Project :M:N1750
Floatdown ofTorospheroid l,500,OOO-Gallon Capacity Tower
Mavo Systems
4300 Main Street
Fridley, Minnesota 55214
Rich Forstner
(763) 788-7713
.
3M Chillwater
KLM Project No. :MN1715
Floatdown of 4,000,000 Gallon Chill Water Ground Storage Reservoir Located at 3M, 8t.
Paul, Minnesota
1995-2000 KLM Reference List
New Construction of Steel Storae:e Tanks
Mr. Mark Rolfs
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates
2335 W. Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
Phone 612-636-4600
.
KLM Project No. :MN 1271
City of Chanhassen
Erection and Coatings inspection ofa New 1,500,000 Gallon Hydrop ill ar.
KLM Project No.M:N 1227
City of Farmington
Erection and Coatings inspection ofa New 1,500,000 Gallon Hydropillar.
Mr. Jeff Ledin, P.E.
Widseth Smith Nolting & Associates, Inc.
2504 Aga Drive
Alexandria, MN 56308
KLM Project No. M:N 1230
City of Ashby, Minnesota
Erection and Coatings inspection of a: New 100,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tower.
ti
~
o
E-<
~
~
~
~
G>
~
~
fil.
1::=
o
~
o
o
o
0'"
o
N
~
Z
~
<<+-.
o
td 1::=
+-' 0
o ,_
~O
0\ c: Go>
Ns::90
N ~ V4
..... ,2; ,5
;Z; ...1"-1
:8~gp
,~.~
o ~ 0
Zou
O;j~
G> C'" d
',,"", G> ~
o
.... ~ d
&lot c.... 0
:E ~'B
H.....G>
~iJ~
t
.
~
-
.c
~
i
-
.....
'a
~
o
II)
=
.c
o
"""
.5
>
~
.-c
C>
N
.cOC
.....Itl
= -
O.....t--
r/)ooc
~ ......:.==
.== Dn ~ ~ oc
~ E .! .l:: .c ~ =
_1:~rI.lt:t--t--
o~;=o",",ff')
IiIic ~.... 0 Z .-I c:r
." _ =Dn iil .. ~ 'D
= ir c:: ].a - 'llt
_~Ji&l:aloo..t--
1oo1oloC"'Iil!!O~-
~..II) 8 t'lIl~ g~
""'0 - cd~." -=1:--
~ _ Q,,-
.t>=;>'D;QI"
.- ~ ~ S ... G3 ~
UO<f'l~~~
~
'C
.g
s::
o
'ij
G>
]:
G>
ks
..c:
0-
r/.)
Cd
t;;
G>
"t:l
G>
~
Go>
bb
s::
.-
m
.~
Z
r::
o
~
o
o
o
o
0"
00 0
o 11'I
11'I ~
..... r/.)
~JJ ks.~
. ~ ~ 'S
000,;
Z~E-c~
g"t:lg S]
'0' .1:J td
~ mbO
10::'1 ~ ..s .5
~ >. 11'I ;:g
~D~~
.
s::
o
'f]
G>
~
r::
I-l
"t:l
]
0-
r/.)
~
G>
13
~
G>
1
t;.i
s::
o
~
I
o
o
o
0"
o
11'I
~
Z
~bO
0\ 0 r::
o ,A;J .-
11'I 1-loI1$
- .~ ';
~JJ-a~
,~.ar::
o 0 0 Cd
Z~Ur::
g ] '"g 'fl
'''''' 100 d ~
00 G> 100
~~<~
10::'10 ~
~ ~ -g 'C
~iJ~.g
IiJ
~
..
....
.c::
II)
'C
QI
=
O'r:
s ~
~ ~
~ =
ct:I ....
l)Il
ZI: l'f')
.. f;I;l ~ = l'f')
~ l)Il >- ff') ~
11)''::: ='C 'llt ,
." ct:I'" ,.. Itl =
... ..... ::: ... Itl 'D ff')
Q,,== Itlff')
~~;iz~a
eoo:E'D~
11 c.U ~ r.G C'D
ct:I ~ ~ ...... Itl
Ioo~>~-O~-
r" .- - = l'f')
..... II) II) ... C. 'D
""," CI)" &'IS 0 t--
O-~f;I;l~.c_
~... = C.
>.. = ~= = ~ ..
....- :.. 0 N .... ""'" ~
,- ~ _ .-c ~ QI &'IS
uO~\OJC.i~~
.
~
.....
....
'6,
o
.a
:t'
~
~ ~
::: E-c
~.~~
,~z
o ~ 1::=
z_o
0........
'E-~ ~
It<<+-.O
08
~.~g'"
~UII'I
bO
r::
.~
o
t)
]
6
'fj
Go>
M
G>
~
'r::
.g
s::
o
'~
0.
1"-1
1::=
,-
~ rJ
. ....
~.e
~ 0
- CI)
~~
~~
-.:.=
~:e ff')c
..~ .-Ic
~"O tn~
~.... CI Itl,
>1C<\C:l 'D
o ..... ." fI') t'IS tI') .-c
_='" .....\0"""
~ ~ I: !:aO_\'f')
1I)~~"~"""'f"'4
~~CI)~c::ItlJ>
~ a~ fn = ~\'f')
;:: ~ ._ ~ .. 'D
o~ cr=,I!':j~-
UII)P ....:g~
""," '::::;;"'::1 'D
obl"-l~ct:I-a.-
>..l:l ~=Itl~ ~..
...- ~ fI') - ~
.... ~ 0 fI') .; OJ _
UO~f'lr/.)f-41i1ic
c
o
'.;J
t)
G>
......
G>
bO
r::
,-
.....
.g
d
o
'.0
t)
G>
0.
1"-1
d
-
af
>
o
t5
G>
i
o
u
tf
G>
.....
......
lZl
.r::
o
r-
d
o
;
-
~:-::
M 0.
trI 0
.....06
~:E'
'1::=
z.Q
-;;
g ~ bO
'0'0,5
.... 0 1\1
&lot 0.. 0
:;Eot)
H 8.."8
~'-ro
Irl
0\
Irl
......
~
ci
Z
...
t)
G>
.0'
.....
~
~
.. ..
1,OOO,OOO-Gallon Hydropillar on Pine Hill, Cottage Grove, Inspection liuring erection
and coating
KLM 2000 Reconditionine Proiects
City of Shoreview
4600 N. Victoria Street
Shoreview, Minnesota 55126
Mark Maloney
(651) 490-4600
KLM Project No. IvINI029
Inspection during reconditioning of 1 ,500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
City of WatertowD
309 Lewis Avenue SouthlPO Box 279
Watertown, Minnesota 55388-2695
Stephen Sarvi
(952) 955-1960
.
KLMProjectNo. MN1240
Inspection during reconditioning of300,OOO-Gallon Single Pedestal Spheroid
City of Baxter
50 Memorywood DriveIPO Box 2626
Baxter, Minnesota 56425
Trevor Walters
(218) 855-5100
KLM Project No. IvIN1320
Inspection during reconditioning of 400,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
.
Village of Algonquin
2200 Hamish Drive
Algonquin, DUnois 60102
Doug Rowley, Director of Public Works
(847) 658-2754 Ext. 420
KLM Project No. MN1367
Inspection during Reconditioning of Countryside Standpipe 400,OOO-Gallon
KLM Project No. MN 1404
Inspection during reconditioning ofCary Road Standpipe 230,OOO-Gallon
Minneapolis Farmers Market
for
City of Minneapolis
Department of Public Works
4300 Marshall Street NE
.. ..
Minneapolis, MN 55421-2500
Robert Verke, P.E.
(612) 661-4900
KLM Project No. MN1454
Inspection during reconditioning of the Center Shed at the Farmers Market
City of Pharr
PO Drawer B
Pharr, Texas 78577
Fred Sandoval, Director of Public Works
(956) 787-7951
.
KLM Project No. l\.1N1275
Inspection during reconditioning of 500,000-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
KLM 2000 Phase I. Existine Tank Evaluation/Inspection (Floatdown)
City of Hope
PO Box 2020
Hope, Arkansas 71802-2020
Les Patterson
(870) 777-3000
KLM Project MN1635
Floatdown of 750,000-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
.
KLM Project MN 1636
Floatdown of200,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
KLM Project MN1637
Floatdown of 500,000-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
KLM Project MN1638
Floatdown of 500, OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
City of Grand Forks
PO Box 5200
Grand Forks, ND 58206
Todd Feland, Public Works
(701) 746-2570
J\.1N"1577 Grand Forks
.F16atdown of 500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower (Menafds Tower)
J\.1N"1580 Grand Forks
Floatdown of 500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower (Viking Tower)
'"" ..
..
City of Cedar Rapids
1111 Shaver Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402-4593
John D. North, Water Utility Director
(319) 286-5060
IvIN1392 Cedar Rapids
Floatdown of2,000,000-Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir (Wilson Tower)
MN1215 Cedar Rapids
Floatdown of2,OOO,000-Glalon Ground Storage Reservoir (60th Avenue Tower)
KLM 2000 Industrial Proiect
Cedar Rapids Bridge
Owner's Representative: Ament, Inc.
5825 Dry Creek LaoeIPO Box 10042
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52410
Michael Hook, PE
(319) 378-1401
.
KLM Project No. MN1513
Inspection Services during reconditioning of CNIP & UP Railroad and 4th Street Bridge
ReconditionioS! Proieds
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430-2199
Scott Brink, PE, City Engineer
Dave Peter, Public Works
(763) 569-3332 and (763) 569-3380
Fax: (763) 585-7159
.
KLM Project No. MNI098
500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Tower
Mr. Mark R. Rolfs, P .E.
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates
2335 West Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
(651) 636-4600
KLM Project No. MNIOIO
City of Eagan, MN
Erection and Coatings Inspection of New 4.0:M:MG Ground Storage Reservoir
~ ..
..
KLM Project No, rvINI007
City of Fergus Falls, MN
Erection and Coatings inspection ofa New 500,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Storage
Reservoir.
KLM Project No. :M:N1067
City of Woodbury, MN
Erection and Coatings Inspection ofa New 2,OOO,OOO-Gallon Elevated Water Storage
Reservoir.
.
Mr. Paul Hanson, PE
Kraus-Anderson Construction
5100 Edinbrook Terrace '
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota
(612) 425-9643
KLM Project No. :M.NI042
Erection and Coatings Inspection of a New Clarifier at Brooklyn Park Water Treatment
Plant.
.
Gov-ernment Proiects
Grand Forks Air Force Base
319 CES/CEV
Sadar Hassan
525 Sixth Avenue
Grand Forks, North Dakota 58205-6434
(701) 747~6154
Owner's Representative:
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
560 Herndon Parkway, Suite 200
Herndon, VA 20170-5240
Jeff Van Atten
(703) 471~8383
Inspection Services on three 500,000 Gallon
and one 400,000 Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tanks on
Grand Forks Air Force Base
KLM Project No.'s MN1387~NIN'l391
Mr. James O. White, PE
United States Public Health ServiceslIndian Health Service
Frt. Duchesne Office of Environmental Health
PO Box 489
Ft. Duchesne, UT84026
435-722-5122 ext. 6883
Mr. Stacey Nephi
.. ,"
Ute Water Systems Director
Ute Tribe Water System
PO Box 186
Ft. Duchesne, UT 84026
KLMProject No. MN1501
Inspection of 75,000 Gallon Watertower
Mr. John Coffey
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers
1243 S. lOth Avenue
Fort McCoy, Wisconsin 54656
(608) 388-5716
KLM Project No. MNll12
Inspection of Clarifies
."
KLM Project No. MNl165
Mr. Frank Prieto
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
5805 NW 11th Street, Suite 340
Miami, Florida 33126-2034
(305) 262-7466
KLM Project MNI045
Reconditioning Inspection of Airport Jet Fuel Tank #4
MSP Airport, 'Minnesota
.
KLM Project No.MN1340
Fuel System Upgrades On Two Tanks at Sky Harbor Airport
Phoenix, Arizona
Mr. Mark Rolfs, PE
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik
2335 W. Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Phone:" (651) 636-4600
'ax: (651) 636-1311
KLM Project 1vIN 1 0 15 Hudson Dam
Reconditioning ofMallielu Dam
Hudson, Wisconsin
Riesberg Architects, LLC
Mr. William Riesberg, PE
296 Meeting Room
PO Box 30938
..
~.
,.
. .. - ... .... .......- --..._.__.._.. --_00". .__._..._____ .... ___._. ...._ ....._......_.._.._.__. ......_.. ___._.._..,.. ....... ...___._..._. ..
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
Phone: (843) 577-3431
Fax: (843) 577-9200
.
South Texas Area Field Office - Southern Division
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Resident Officer in Charge of Contracts -ENS Smith
8851 Ocean Drive, Suite 101
Building 19, Naval Air Station
Corpus Christi, Texas 78419-5525
Phone: (361) 2154 x 39
DSN 861-2154 x 239
Fax: (361) 961-5175
DSN (861) 5175
KLM Project No. MN1645
500,OOO-GaIlon Elevated Water Tower
Inspection and U.T. Thickness ReadingIReport
Corpus Christi, Texas
Naval Air Station
Lead Abatement Proiects
Mr. Mike- Pelletier
City of Virginia
PO Box 1048
Virginia, Minnesota 55792
(218) 741-0740
.
KLM Project MNI081
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications and Field Inspection of2,OOO,OOO-Gallon Ground
Storage Reservoir, Hospital Standpipe. Project included full containment and disposal of
waste generated.
Mr. Gary Peters
City of Wadena
222 Second Street SE
Wadena, Minnesota 56482
(218) 631-1813
KLM Project lvINl 086
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications and Field Inspection of a 2,OOO,OOO-Gallon Ground
Storage Reservoir. Project included full containment and disposal of waste generated.
Mr. Kevin Bucholz, PE
Moore Engineering, Inc.
1042 14th Street
West Fargo, North Dakota 58078
(701) 282-4692
.
''',
..
__.......__... ___ e.__ .__...__....._....
..... __ _ __'_______'.__".__" _ __...._ _. .__.____..__ __....__...._._ ., ..._.___u_......_ ...__.____ . _._...____.... ..__.___.__
KLM Project MNlO07
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications arid Field Inspection of a 500,OOO-Ga11on Elevated
Water Storage Tank (City Maintenance Tower). Project included full containment and
disposal of waste generated. .
Mr. MarkR. Rolfs, P.E.
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates
2335 West Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
(651) 636-4600
KLMProject No.JMN1018
City of Little Falis, MN
Reconditioning Inspection of a 1.0 MMG Elevated Water Tower. This included full
containment and disposal of waste generated.
..
KLM Project No. 1005
City of New Hope, MN
Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Reconditioning of a 500,OOO-Gallon
Elevated Water Tower. This included full containment and disposal of waste generated.
Mr. James R. Prusak, PE
City of Cloquet
1307 Cloquet Avenue
Cloquet, Minnesota 55720-1657
(218) 879-3347
KLMProjectNo. MNI012 .
City of Cloquet
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications and Field Inspection ofa 5.0 MMG Ground Storage
Reservoir. Containment and disposal of waste generated.
KLMProject MNI013
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications and Field Inspection of a 2.0 MMG Ground Storage
Reservoir. Containment and disposal of waste generated.
Mr. Greg Boppre, PE
FloaD Sanders Engineering
PO Box 385
East Grand Forks, Minnesota 56721
(218) 773-1185
KLM Project MNI014
City of East Grand Forks, MN
Reconditioning Plans, Specifications and Field Inspection of 500,000..Gallon Elevated
Water Tower. Project included full containment and disposal of waste generated.
1'"'1
r---
f;l
fJ ltl
.-
....
= C'lI
;:: ....
t;J a
-a .~ =
'3 :a ~~ f;}
0= :aN
t!l~= ..~
==N=O\
cuc~eoo
el1cl$ff')
::s~=~s
C'lI'C O'C N
~~~~c,
~
~
~..
4)
....
o ~
o ~
O~
oft 0
V"IC\i
C"I ~
'" 0
~Q.
o.~
cOO
0'0
'B ~
0....
Q.e
~ 0
~ S
'0.5
- '"
0....
.... e
~ 0
'0 0
e-
"'-
~ca
S'O
.,.., 0
1;i"t:2
0.E
tl:l 0
.- e
0'-
01:)
0-0
rI.:l.~
~ft e
~~
- ""
~ 0
.,.,. bI) ~
o c 0
o 'a E-t
- 0'"
~ z.- 0
~~~~
'd'c~
Zo 0 8"t:l
....,. 0 0
1:)B~~
o C ft >
'~'I"" = 4) .
O-O-"t:l
"" ~ .... ~ 0
~~~e~
~>.~.9~
~:t::>-;5
~ U r.LI CJ bO
0\
C\
1'"'4
~
tI)
~
If)
If)
~elI
ClI....
s. ~ ~
.! :; ~
I: ~.:I
4)~~
U cu
cu .:
= s. cu
=I:~u=s:
.... 0 -: 4) cu;:;)"
; C Os. "Sb U tI')
.... cu 1:... I
.1:: ~ =.... ... C\
'g~~~g~
8~.t'~g~
~~u~=c
.
"0
o
~
>
o
~
a:::
o
~
o
o
o
ci
o
o
ft
-
'"
~
o
5
'f1
o
Q.
~
.s
"0
G)
~
"0
a:::
'"
~
c
o
.~
o
t;::.
.....-
oogC"l
O\Q.'
:::m~
~ ~ft ~
- ~
o ~ 0
Z bI) f-4
a:::'-'
g'a ~
'0'.9 ~
"" .1:: ~
~-g...
~ 0 0
~01lS
sa~~
~
=
o
....
....
u
cu
\0
1'"'4
~
If)
If)
2
JIool
=
o ell
,.Q ....
s. . Cl
ell -a IlI3
U ~~;
-a ell All I:
4) l'c """ ....
.. ~J~
~ S ':1 g .:l e
uco.....s.e
<4)~;d:~
s.-a-I:IlI3~
ClI I: ~ .... .... N
=<~~gC\
; i .t-~ ~ ~
r~ U .- c::> ...: ~
....nl.l U If) ll) _
.
1
E-4
U
<
"
to..
o
bI)
r:::
....
c
o
'';::
]
o
o
o
~
~
'C
0\ ::s
l'f'l'O
o CI.I
~.s
1:) ~
om
.= e
o 0
""....
~1:)
~j
1'"'4
C
e
0\
"lit'
~ :;
iL!fl
>-=
<.~
-= J. ~ s:
Ill!I .0-
.... u.~ W\......
O~~g~
~ .:~~;
~Clrl.:latl')
~il().!G'
.... So. 0 <<l 1'"'4
~oo~~~
~
f-<
U
<
"
to-.
o
00
r:::
'a
o
'';::
:.a
c:
o
o
~
Voo
o c:
- ....
- ~
~~
o
'0
0._
Z C:
... 0
~VJ
. '="' c:
o 0
...........
~t)
~j
J.
4)
.....
s::::
4)
U
4) r---
J. tI')
<<l ~
U4)~
4) .~
a J. <<l
oQ-o
/:1:1 tU iii)
Ill!I e tU
..... .~ 0 =
.~ ~ g /:1:1 .9
OtU~u:E
tt (;.i ~ .; =-
C .= <<l ~ .s
o c..... =co
'::l=O~d
.... tU iii) ~ .~
oQ~~e
e . = 0 0
4) "".... 1O 0
~~~=S5
",,'
".
41
'\
(952) 948-7981
KLMProject MNI027
KLM Plans, Specifications and Inspection Services during Demolition of a 100,000
Gallon Elevated Water Tank (Bluff Circle Tower).
Mr. Wayne Schwanz
City of Eagan
3501 Coachman Paint
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
(612) 681-4600
KLM Project rv.lNl 063
KLM Plans, Specifications and Inspection Services during Demolition of2,OOO,OOO
Gallon Elevated Water Tower (Cliff Road).
.
Industrial Proiects
Mr. Bruce M. Kelley, P.E.
URS Greiner, Inc.
7650 W. Courtney Campbell Causeway
Tampa, Florida 33706-1462
Telephone: (813) 286-1711
KLM Project No. MN1233
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport
Erection and Coatings Inspection of Two (2) 48-foot Diameter JP-5 Fuel Tanks for the
Fueling Facility at the HlllI Terminal.
KLM Project No. MN1263
Sand Island, Hawaii
Erection and Coatings Inspection of Three (3) New 60,000-Barrel Drum Tanks.
.
KLM Project No. MNI045
Failure Analysis and Third Party Coatings Inspection of a 54,000 Barrel Jet Fuel Storage
Facility Tank, MplslSt. Paul International Airport for Metropolitan Airports Commission
of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The above references are only a few taken from each year. If there is an area or size of
project you are looking for a reference, please feel free to call Shawn Mulhern, Manager
of Marketing at (651) 773-5111.
..
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 13, 2004
.
TO:
FROM:
The attached correspondence from the Minnetonka Public Schools is a request for the City's
participation in the Kids Voting Minnesota program. This is a voter education program for
children in K-12, and is encouraged by the Secretary of State. The program allows children to
go to the adult polling locations on Election Day to learn about the importance of voting, and to
actually cast their vote at the polls.
.
The City needsto provide space at its polling locations to set up a separate voting area for
. children. The program will be organized and staffed by Minnetonka Public School volunteers.
Staff has met with the Jeanne Straus, the School District Volunteer Coordinator, and has made
arrangements for Kids Voting Minnesota to be set up at its four mainland polling locations.
It is recommended that the attached Kids Voting Proclamation be approved, encouraging
children to vote on November 2.
Recommended Action:
A motion approving the Kids Voting Proclamation.
ft
\..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
if 3b
..
RECEIVED
Jeanne Straus
Community Involvement &
Adult Education Coordinator
c-
'-_: .';
Community Education & Services
5621 County Road 101
Minnetonka, MN 55345
ClTY OF SHOREWOOD
(952) 401-5055
(952) 401-5011 fax
jeanne.straus@minnetonka.kI2.mn.us
Mayor Woody Love
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood MN 55331
Dear Mayor Love,
A voter education program, KIDS VOTING, for K-12 students was introduced in the
Minnetonka Public Schools in 2002. It's a one-of-a-kind program supported by
government officials, civic groups, Chambers of Commerce, and schools. KIDS
VOTING is still the country's ONLY program in which children actually go to adult polls
on Election Day, many of them accompanied by family members or other adults. One of
the program goals is to have voting become a family affair.
.
Mary Kiffmeyer, Secretary of State, has encouraged communities to participate. Mary
shares "As the state's chief election official, it is one of my goals to have every
Minnesotan involved in elections in some way or another. Our nation is made stronger
by increased citizen participation at every level, and I believe there are roles to play for
absolutely everyone, regardless of age. n
Thank you for your past support of this program in the 2002 elections. You, your City
Council, City Clerk and Election Judges were very supportive of the program. With the
past support of all 1 0 municipalities in District 276, over 3200 children were able to vote
in 29 precinct sites. .
We ask you to join with us againin this partnership that provides non-traditional
ciassroom settings (the preciiiCt' sites) fore:ducationalopportunities foral! K"12 students.
We again need space at each precinct site for a table. Registration and voting can take
place at one table.
If you are able to participate with us again, we invite you to publicly share your support of
this program at your next City Council Meeting. If you would like me to come and share
a video and answer a few questions, I would be glad to come. A City Proclamation is
enclosed for your use. A KIDS VOTING brochure is also enclosed for your use.
If you have any questions, please call me at 952-401-5055.
Sincerely,
9/-~ .;ftz-CLuA-
Jeanne Straus
District Volunteer Coordinator - Minnetonka Public Schools
SERVING THE COMMUNITIES OF: MINNETONKA' CHANHASSEN . DEEPHAVEN . EDEN PRAIRIE' EXCELSIOR' GREENWOOD' SHOREWOOD . TONKA BAY' VICTORJA . WOODLAND
.'
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
KIDS VOTING PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING stimulates high civic volunteerism
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING is endorsed by the office of the Secretary of State
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING is half community based and half education based
.
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING engages well-known community leaders across the state to reverse
the trend of increasingly low voter turnout
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING gives kids a chance to voice their opinion at the polls
WHEREAS: KIDS VOTING helps develop lifelong voters who will affect the future of politics in
the USA
We hereby agree to partner with District 276 in the continuing process of revitalizing the dream
of democracy our country was founded upon.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th
day of October, 2004.
Woody Love, Mayor
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SETBACK VARIANCE
TO RONALD AND MELANIE ROGNEY
WHEREAS, Ronald and Melanie Rogney (Applicants) are the owners of real
property located at 5950 Grant Street, City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota, legally described as:
"Lot 90, Academy Addition to Excelsior, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have an existing single-family dwelling, which dwelling is
located approximately 16.1 feet from the right-of-way of Grant Street and 11.8 feet from the
south boundary of the property, making it a nonconforming structure; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for a variance to construct a second story
addition on the west side of the existing building; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, whose
recommendations are included in a memorandum, dated 1 September 2004, a copy of which is on
file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice a public hearing was held and the application reviewed
by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on 7 September 2004, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the application at its regular meeting on 25
October 2004, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the Planning Commission's
recommendations were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the Applicant
and from the City staff; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject property is located in an R-1D, Single-Family Residential zoning
district, which requires a 30-foot setback from the public right-of-way and a 35-foot setback from
the rear property line.
2. The existing building on the property is located approximately 16.1 feet from the
right-of-way of Grant Street.
:#5E
3. The existing home was built in 1910, is in very sound physical condition, and is
entirely outside of the buildable area of the lot.
4. In 1983 the property was granted a setback variance for a one-story addition on
the west side of the existing home. The variance include a stipulation that the rear yard setback
discrepancy (23.2 feet) be made up by a corresponding increase in the front yard setback on the
north side of the lot.
5. The Applicants propose to construct a second-story addition that will not increase
the footprint area of the existing home.
6. The existing home contains approximately 1425 square feet of floor area on the
two main levels, not including the basement.
7.
The proposed addition contains 464 square feet of area.
.
CONCLUSIONS
a. That the Applicants have satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under the
Shorewood City Code and have established an undue hardship as defmed by Minnesota Statutes.
b. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants to the Applicants a
setback variance to construct the addition, subject to the stipulation that the required front (north)
yard setback be increased from 30 feet to 53.2 feet.
c. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a
certified copy of this resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of
Titles.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of
October 2004.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
-2-
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 19, 2004
TO:
Mayor and Council Members
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk ei)/ ~
.
FROM:
RE:
Commissioner Recognition
Three commissioners have resigned over the past few months. Recognition for their service to
the Shorewood community.is scheduled for the October 25 City Council meeting.
Former Park Commissioner Pat Arnst will be present this evening to receive a recognition plaque
for her 7 and 1/2 years of service on the Park Commission.
.
Former Planning Commissioners Deborah Borkon, who served 3 years; and Donna Woodruff,
who served almost 6 years, are also to receive recognition; however, they will not be present this
evening.
4F5A
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
.
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Minnetonka Community Education and Services (MCES)
Tim Litfin started in September as the new Executive Director of MCES. He will provide Council
an update ofMCES activities and the restructuring of the MCES Advisory Council proposed by the
Board of the Minnetonka Independent School District. He will also be prepared to answer questions
that Councilmembers may have after hearing the concerns stated by Tad Shaw, Shorewood's
longtime representative on the MCES Advisory Board, at the last Council meeting.
.
#56
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETNG
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5,2004
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Present:
Chair Bailey; Commissioners Conley, Gagne, Gniffke, Packard, White,
Woodruff; and Planning Director Nielsen
Council Liaison Garfunkel
Absent:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
. September 21, 2004
Gagne moved, Woodruff seconded, Approving the September 21, 2004, Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes as presented. Motion passed 7/0.
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - SETBACK VARIANCE
Applicant:
Location:
Carl and Ali Zinn
5820 Ridge Road
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:00 P.M. He summarized the procedures utilized in a Public
Hearing, noting requests heard this evening will be placed on the October 25,2004 Regular City Council
Meeting Agenda for further discussion and consideration.
Director Nielsen explained the property owners would like to convert an existing attached garage into
living space and construct a new attached garage in the front of the house. Two private roadways serve
the property. The eastern boundary is Ridge Road, which is the primary access to all the homes between
Christmas Lake and Silver Lake. There is a secondary road over the Zinn property that becomes a private
drive just past the Zinn property. The applicant proposes to locate the garage in the flat area at the front
of the property. Due to the location of the second private road the proposed garage requires a setback
variance of 25 feet.
The zoning ordinance provides procedures and criteria for granting variances and the staff reports outlines
those criteria. The circumstances must be unique to the property. In this case the topography satisfies
that part of the criteria. Also the small amount of available land in which to build on is subject to the
private road setback.
Upon analysis of the case, Director Nielsen explained that the area of the proposed garage is within size
limitations and smaller than the adjacent garages. The applicant's plight is not of their own doing they
did not create the topographic conditions and the private road setback is a new requirement to code as of
1991. Also the proposed garage size is in keeping with the character of the area.
Director Nielsen noted that this case is consistent with the provisions for granting a variance and based on
the property conditions staff recommends approval of the setback variance.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
October 5, 2004
Page 2 of 5
w
Carl Zinn, applicant, stated that the adjacent home to the north was not subject to the private road setback.
Director Nielsen corrected Mr. Zinn noting that the adjacent property is subject to the private road
setback.
There being no one present wishing to address the commission regarding this case, Chair Bailey closed
the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:09P.M.
Gagne moved, Gniffke seconded, Recommending Approval of a Setback Variance to allow
construction of an attached garage subject to staff recommendations, for Carl Zinn, 5820 Ridge
Road. Motion passed 7/0.
2. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING- VARIANCE OF THE HARDCOVER REGULATIONS
Applicant:
Location:
Dick and Kelly Cassidy
26140 Birch Bluff Road
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7: 15P .M.
.
Director Nielsen explained the applicants have a purchase agreement for the property located at 26140
Birch Bluff Road and propose to demolish the existing home on the property and build a new home which
would necessitate a variance of the 25 percent hardcover restriction. The property is located in the R-
lCIS zone and subject to shoreland regulations. The lot is nonconforming with regard to area, however is
deemed buildable under city code because it meets 70 percent of the required minimums for that zone.
The topography rises approximately ten feet to the existing home and then drops off somewhat abruptly to
Lake Minnetonka to the north. A loop driveway serves the existing home. The applicant also proposes to
remove an existing shed down by the lake.
The proposed home eliminates the loop driveway by creating a side loading approach on the higher part
of the lot. The proposed home would contain 8257 square feet of floor area divided between three levels.
The new three-car garage would have 887 square feet of floor area. At present, the impervious surface on
the site amounts to 33.7 percent. The maximum for the shoreland district is 25 percent. The proposed
plan reduces the impervious cover to 29.67 percent. The applicants propose to mitigate the variance by '.
using a permeable brick paving system.
The lot is deemed buildable by zoning standards. The proposed house complies with the zoning setbacks
but the hardcover is over by 4.67 percent. The other criteria for building on a substandard lot deals with
floor area ratio. The ordinance denotes the floor area of all structures on the property cannot exceed 30
percent to the lot area. Director Nielsen stated based on the amount of floor area proposed the calculation
comes out to 55 percent. He also stated that the applicant's letter does not demonstrate hardship.
Director Nielsen noted that there is a lot of discussion about the use of permeable pavers and the
information is impressive, however, it is too early to tell how the product will weather. The watershed
district is interested in these products. The DNR is more skeptical about the use of the product. The
DNR encourages the use of these types of systems but does not recognize it as a means for achieving the
25 percent impervious cover.
Director Nielsen stated that the DNR points out that the hardcover requirement, in addition to the primary
purpose to handle drainage on properties, also has an aesthetic element which is to allow a certain amount
of green space on every lot and they do not feel these systems are a replacement for vegetation.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
October 5, 2004
Page 3 of 5
He went on to explain that this matter belongs in a conversation regarding a zoning text amendment rather
than a variance. There is not clear hardship in this case. The lot is buildable and a smaller structure
rearranged differently could meet the hardcover restriction.
Director Nielsen recommended denial of the variance in this case. He also stated any future discussion
regarding zoning text amendments would involve a fair amount of study of permeable pavers and the City
should consider working with the City of Excelsior on this issue.
Dick Cassidy, applicant, addressed the Commission. He stated that his family has been researching a
place to live on the lake and are interested in living in Shorewood. Mr. Cassidy distributed a packet to the
Commission addressing the current situation and the hardship as they saw it. Mr. Cassidy noted that they
would like to make the property wheel chair accessible. The current home was built in 1900 and the
materials used then do not make the home efficient in comparison with today's standards. They feel the
hardship is that the existing home does not meet today's standards and the opportunity to improve upon
that is in reconstruction, which would also improve the overall situation for the lot.
. Mr. Cassidy noted that they could remodel the home in three separate phases, however there would still
be the same amount of hardcover and the shed would still exist in the lake setback, not to mention three
years of construction traffic. Mr. Cassidy stated they felt the logical option would be to accept the
variance, which is an overall improvement by eliminating the shed and hardcover in the lake setback area.
Also improving the function, efficiency and safety of the home, including improving the property value
for the City and neighborhood.
Mr. Cassidy stated that livable space in the home would be 5400 square feet. There would be three
bedrooms above the ground. There would be space under the garage for storage and recreation. If the
City allowed permeable pavers as an alternative to hardcover, it would keep the property at 20.7 percent.
However, if normal paving is installed it brings the total up to 29 percent. The proposal is still a
significant reduction from what exists today.
.
Mr. Cassidy noted that the permeable pavers are a unique concept and have the same standards as a
normal concrete driveway, but they allow water, air and roots to flow and can absorb 2.5 inches of rain
water every hour, which is better than grass, if done properly. Mr. Cassidy noted that there are several
communities that are allowing the use of pavers as an alternative.
Mr. Mike Sharratt, architect, addressed the Commission regarding several graphics that were distributed.
Mr. Sharratt questioned the ordinance with regard to allowable floor area noting their calculations are at
33.6 percent floor area ratio. Mr. Sharratt wanted to confmn that floor area ratio is not part of this
discussion and will meet the floor area ratio when submitting a plan for a permit. Mr. Sharratt addressed
the issue of the driveway noting the hardship of the grade in order to make the house handicap accessible
because the grade would be about six feet below the first floor entrance. To put the house to reasonable
use the driveway would need to load to the side. Director Nielsen noted that he stands corrected on the
floor area calculation and explained that the floor area does exclude basement area.
CaI Nelson, 26190 Birch Bluff Road, stated that he supports the plan and feels the home would be an
improvement to the property. Mr. Nelson stated the pavers work well and feel they are a good option.
Mr. Nelson stated that the purpose of the ordinance is to protect the neighborhood and if the
neighborhood feels the proposal is a good thing then it should be allowed.
Mr. Cassidy, applicant, noted that he also included letters in the packet from neighbors in support of the
proposal.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
October 5, 2004
Page 4 of 5
Mike Clausen, 26165 Birch Bluff Road, stated that he lives across the street and supports the plan noting
that it actually appears to be a smaller house from the road and supports the smaller driveway plan. He
felt it increased the value of the neighborhood and is an obvious improvement from the existing.
Mark Gruss, present owner, stated that the property is in ill repair and cannot be fixed. The time has
come for the home to be replaced.
Mike Kozel, 26170 Birch Bluff, stated that he supports the pavers and noted the research he has read
indicates they are permeable and they look better than the existing blacktop driveway.
There being no further public comment, Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public
Hearing at 7:45P.M.
Commissioner Woodruff agreed hardship is a difficult hurdle and the lot is not huge but believes it is
buildable at 25 percent, stating there are optional designs that could meet the 25 percent cover.
Commissioner Conley asked Director Nielsen if he was aware if the surrounding communities, noted in .
the information distributed by the applicant, had accepted the pavers as permeable structures. Director
Nielsen replied that he was not aware of the acceptance of pavers by the communities noted.
Commissioner White stated that she is familiar with an area covered with pavers with a small slope and
noted that the pavers do work, however the land had never been compacted or built on.
Commissioner Gagne stated that he is not comfortable with the additional hard surface. He agreed the
permeable pavers are an interesting concept, but agrees with staff analysis noting that there is not enough
information to grant the requested variance using this material, unless there is further study and it can be
adopted as ordinance to use in an orderly way. He also noted it is a shoreline property and a sensitive
area for water runoff in general and he is not comfortable granting variances using this technology as a
test case in this area. Commissioner Gagne stated that this idea might have merit at some point in the
future.
Commissioner Gniftke agreed with the other commission members concerns and noted that it is not a .
replacement for vegetation.
Commissioner Packard stated that they have put great effort into the plan and the additional green space
would be great. She can also understand the need to tear the house down. She stated that she agrees with
the other Commission Member's comments and feels there is a way to reduce the hardcover.
Commissioner White asked what would replace the walkway to the lake. Mr. Cassidy responded stating
they would replace the walkway with grass or mulch.
Mr. Sharratt, architect, reiterated that the steep slope of the front yard requires the driveway to be longer
than it otherwise would have to be if grades were not as they presently are.
Chair Bailey stated that he feels the building is too large for the property. He stated that it is important
that the commission apply the standards of the ordinance regarding the 25 percent hardcover limitation.
Commissioner Gagne agreed that the house is too big for the lot and would need to be revised to fit.
'!.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
October 5, 2004
Page 5 of5
Mr. Cassidy asked if the Commission suggests they eliminate a bedroom or kitchen to reduce the
structure.
Chair Bailey noted that the Commission cannot design the house for the applicants, but are limited to the
City code of 25 percent hardcover, which is the issue, and this property is not unique in that regard.
Woodruff moved, Packard seconded, Recommending Denial of the Variance for Hardcover for
26140 Birch Bluff Road. Motion passed.7/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
4. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
.
Director Nielsen explained the next meeting of the Planning Commission set for October 17, will be a
study session that includes a number of housekeeping zoning ordinance amendments. State law requires
certain zoning code be brought up to the state standards. Also the Commission will be reviewing the
Special zoning districts.
5. REPORTS
. Liaison to Council
Commissioner Gniftke reported on matters considered and actions taken at the September 27, 2004
Regular City Council Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). Council had discussion
regarding the Excelsior library and passed a resolution to study the matter further.
. SLUC
. No report given.
. Other
No other reports were given.
6. ADJOURNMENT
Woodruff moved, Gagne seconded, Adjourning the October 5, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting
at 8:04 P.M. Motion passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLYSUBNllTTED.
Shelley Souers,
Recording Secretary
"
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.ci.shorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
30 September 2004
RE:
Zinn, Carl- Setback Variance
FILE NO.:
405 (04.27)
BACKGROUND
.
Carl and Ali Zinn own the property at 5820 Ridge Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit
A, attached). The Zinns would like to convert an existing attached garage into living
space and build a new garage at the front of the house as shown on Exhibit B. The
property is served by two private roads. Ridge Road boUnds the east side of the lot. A
smaller private road provides access from Ridge Road to the. Zinns' and three other
homes (see Exhibit C). Due to the location of the second private road, the new garage
requires a setback variance of 25 feet.
The subject property is zoned R-IA/S, Single-family Residential/Shoreland and contains
62,339 square feet of area (1.45 ac). As can be seen on Exhibits C and D, the existing
home is situated on the north end of the high part of the ridge that lies between Christmas
Lake and Silver Lake. The existing home contains 3618 square feet of floor area on three
levels. Converting the existing garage to living space adds another 484 square feet to the
house.
The applicants explain their request in a letter (Exhibit E), dated 6 September 2004. The
proposed garage has three-stalls and contains 877 square feet of area. Exhibits F-H
illustrate how the garage wi11look.
n
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#: 8.A.
Memorandum
Re: Zinn Variance Request
30 September 2004
ANAL YSISIRECOMMENDATION
Section 1201.05 of the Code provides the procedures and criteria for granting variances.
Following is how the applicants' request complies with the criteria for variance:
.
A. Circumstances unique to the property. Despite the oversized area ofthe lot (half
again as much area as required), there is relatively little buildable area due to the
rather dramatic topography of the site. As shown on Exhibits C and D, the site
drops off in three directions, one of which is protected by bluff impact zoning.
Even more significantly, the setback required from the second private road
serving the two lots to the south of the applicants' cuts into what little level
ground exists on the site. Even if it were not too steep, the area between the two
private roads is unbuildable because the required setbacks overlap one another.
B. The area of the proposed garage is well within what is allowed by the Zoning
Code. With the e~ception of the house encroaching on the bluff setback on the
north end of the site, the exi~ting and proposed structures comply with R-IA/S
setback requirements. It is worth noting that the amount of impervious surface on
this site is only 10 percent, 15 percent less than the maximum allowed.
As .can be seen on Exhibits C and D, the applicants'home is relatively modest
compared to. other homes on Ridge Road. Even with the remodeling and new
garage, the house is considerably smaller than homes in the neighborhood. The
topographic conditions, combine with the "extra" road prevent the applicant from
making reasonable use of the property.
.
C. The applicants' plight is not of their own doing. The applicant did not create the
topographic conditions, and the setback from the private road is a relatively new
requirement (1991).
D. As mentioned in B. above, the home is and sti11 wi11 be smaller than the other
homes on Ridge Road. The proposed garage is considered to be in keeping with
other homes in the area and wi11 not alter the essential character of the area.
The applicants' request is the type of case for which variance provisions were intended.
The Code specifically references topographic conditions in the consideration of
variances. Staff can not think of another case where a property is affected by two private
roads, making this case truly unique. Based upon these circumstances, approval of the
variance is recommended. .
Cc: Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Joe pazandak
Carl Zinn
-2-
'~~~~:~~ioDl~~~~~~~~~~
=r ~ ~ LL ~ i \lJlLV~U~7 ~\,.I / A~ ~~lJ__~VI'; I
· · · '--~ lJ. .~~/' 1==:l ~~~~/I ~ ~
"~ · : · .(i]; ... ~Yn7lr ..~-#-
[S\ . i\:---' Q'>C--~ ~ ~ v.-
i\ 1--- I ~ u .~~_
~)~ . l-- S/--l/jfIJ .. ~ ~ .. l.~~ -:-.J/ ...., ~ ~ ~
~V-......,:: il ~ 1--1 ~ ~ ~ ~
~,~ - ~ I I .. /.? ~ .1-'-.: ~ ..
~ ~ ~~ L: ~~ ~j .. ~.. ~ .. ~ ~
~py- ~/~I // I W~ ~
N OLe ~ Y V ~ ~ ~ \ .. /" ~
~ ~~~ ~
~ ~ " ~'\
ul ~ f/, -u> ~ :.,.JJ.
.... .. t: ~ -:r- ~
~ ~~
~ ~ ~\ ~~
~ .. .. It::::- ....J
~ ~ ~ L---~ (j)
.. r~ <(
~ ~ ..,.., \ :\ ~ ;z~ g
~
r ~Ii_~~? - 5 0
_JJ ~\ 1k-~ -~ >~~
~ /; 7)Ff-
:/U ~.~~M ~-
(~ (,(\~---i
- ,
.'1
~l
--::;;;
1
~
-
-
IllY
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
~ Zinn Variance
.. ~
- ,.---~
~
I'
,\
,,- M ~ - _I ,
--J ....()(),IJ,GtJS" T - 6
101:_ ,/ - - ... .. :::- - _ ~6'9Z1
,.,.. ",," l
~- *~ :.Q,S
""" I - t!f.1J-<:Q ~
' 1 -_ ~""'ol'-_
,I&J I <iW: - /- '~ ~~
:5 ,~ ~.oI:I~ - - ,,'b - a rr
.0 ,V) ~'""'l<P ~ 'b _ .
lXlq ~.. ~..lt~.._...~ _ _ Q. U M Q
::::: ~lXl . - __ I'J.la.~~ ~.
... ~.............. m .... 101 I r- - _ ~oo.01:91S _ .<,~
........ ~ I Oil -_ -- ......-<oS'"
........ -- ~,
Pko~ ' . I (BI --~ ~'r....
~ ~~ ~ .....~gil 1-"""
r-' ,~ . ,. -I .....
. '"2:i i ..... ...... \ I ' ,l,
,l.....~ r 4J
I
~
:::J
(.)
,I&J
~~
.~-
\,
~,
"....--
'.......
~ ~e.
- i~~
Z~VlE
o ~,
!I. ~!
< ~:
:E II:: l
lIS VI ~ i
. * i
..11;:10:
..11Hz:
~~~
:c i5..J
(.) ~
U)
.
-~
'\'l
D:P i
~lJ~
Ii' ~II
itd
i ch
I~]i
~41~
8::s~o
Il~!
_~:P
ri q qqqq~
CD m~+~ .
. ~ IOI')I')NCD
II) I') N I')CD
CD
~
a
~ ~!
1"0 S
It II)
~
.~ IX
1 ~
'I
~ M
~l
~ ~ I!i~
!~
......
c.i
a
.-
.....
;n
a
~
...
~
u
"2
~ 3
.......
~"f\::J
~-t:.~
<:), 'h
:2=-.
Exhibit B
SURVEY ISITE PLAN
.
+
~...
L-~~
~-:Z:-
~~
~~
~-1
+
+
.-
(..
~
Exhibit C
AREA TOPOGRAPHY
"a
Exhibit D
SITE TOPOGRAPHY
.
.
SEP 7 2004
September 6, 2004
Planning Commission
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
RE: Request for set back variance for 5820 Ridge Road
Dear Commissioners,
We request that the required setback for our contemplated garage addition be calculated from our
east property line (approximately Ridge Road) as it is for our neighbors; or in the alternative, that
a variance be granted allowing a 20 foot setback from the pavement for the easement for access
to our neighbors to the south.
Expansion is only possible to the east (towards the access easement) because of the drainage and
utility easements to the south, bluff ordinances to the west and northwest and severe topography
to the north.
These circumstances are unique to this property. Because the easement across our property, that
we given to the neighbors to the north many years ago, serves two neighbors, the easement is
considered a "private road", with setback restrictions, Our neighbors to the south has no such
restrictions because for them it is considered a "shared driveway". A literal interpretation of the
ordinance deprives me of rights enjoyed by my neighbors.
The proposed garage addition does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
Our neighbors to the south can have their garages, or any other structures up to and on either side
of the easement. Our neighbor to the south has a cabin within 15 feet of the easement and a
garage within 35 feet of the easement.
Our neighbors' lots are also quite large with large distances between structures, and large
elevation changes. so the proposed three car garage addition does not affect the air or light of our
neighbors. The neighbor's home to the south is much higher than ours. .
Without this variance the property cannot be put to reasonable use. Our home is functionally
obsolete without the proposed addition.. The house is clearly a teardown if we cannot add a main
floor laundry, pantry, mudroom and a larger kitchen and powder room. Because of the severe
topography of this lot, we can only add these rooms in the existing garage space which creates
the need to add a garage. Weare convinced that this same variance would be required if the
home is tom down and replaced with new construction.
Thank you for your consideration.
a. J,:...J ~ ~
Ali anarl Zinn
Exhibit E
APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER
. ,
.
\.
t
~.
~ fe'
.; ;..,
-0;,
,~
.
.'(
'ff
.\ ~
'4
2-
J
~~
j.
!
-<
Exhi bit F
ELEVATION - FRONT
"
\
n
n
., i
P
11
i'i
.. ~
.
, .
C1
.'
~ ~"
.
It '11,1
l { ~ 1
'1: \, II t\", :,;, . ,
; r ~ l':
I ~ ! " i. ,~ ~ .
, 'I' ' ;/ ,.;
U III ,I,! 1\
, I ! I " , i ii,' ~ f i \ I
1\1\; iql\IHU~
;! \ i! \,j \ ! I \ I r;
j Ii! 1 \\ \ II ' ~ i ~
\Ill! i'\l!\Hl'l\l
: ~ -J, :,' ~:, ',-;, ~i,'.','" t:", :,;,";, t \ { ~; t i j}
'I ',~~i~~',~.)'~
t:;~i.~ ~1':'t'J't~~it
I i'l \' !;, ~ i ! j ,i j: i' q i
. ~,. ~. ")'"::; 1 1 ~ "
;itl ~-,): J~t~ 1~:'\'i;\
li:\ '.'~ I, (!~ i ,i~ ~'i ~ ~ ~~~
ll~ fi ~.\ \f:J\ ~ \~ f\t I i,i,I,!,'~
rtt'~:~~t~~)ii:tj
I j i I 5 i ~ ~;1 :'. !" !! ~ I . l~ 1
\j)\ i U\U \I~ HU iH
\ i \ \ ) ;, P' 1\ l I ' I \ :!l )
i~ iii f} }l~ ~ ,I ':!~! ~I.~
Il ) i I II' I :\' I f \l f i ,r l " 1 \
j 11 j !,! !! il \ I} ! ! ; j
1 ,1 ' II" /' 1 ;! I \ I \ I ' I
\\11 HI\'!ifdl!{lll
ill' \ .' ~ i ;, 1 : 1 t~' i ,!
! 1 f ;:. I,! I 1, I I, ( i \ ,I" H,'
, I \ i ' ), i j ,\ " it, I i
\ \ \ \ ;,', 1,1 /1 I :.' Ii, I,ll ill \. f.",
1\ Ii tl LQ"ll' \ l~,,{,
I I ! ; 1 \ ~ \ i ,! 1 i 1i
II l' \' I I . { ,I; I
)l \1 \' \! t \(:;
\ f 1'1 'I \ \\
I iI, '. I ',.'
''-'~ ','"i'.~ . ~ ,
~
4"
:>
~
~
is'
.-i
f...
~
if 1)
,$
~
Ul
2:
o
~
Z.
:z
-
N
~
;z.
>
t-tU
~j
~U\
()
Exhibit G
ELEVATION - NORTH SIDE
,
.
fL
\.11,.1 i'.: i
t ' l~ .: l :
I 'I'
j II '.. '
: I "
~ f J ~
!. \ 1 . ~ j
{I ~l..i,. I
r f ? ~ f
! I .., it
II t t (
I[ Hl1
',I t' \.1\
\' it l
I ~ i .'i
! liq
! I Ii I
\'. I. '!
III
I IP i
I l,i!.
I.': 't
. Ii I
. i"
j 1\/
( ,11
, I,.ll
'1 I;
\ II
! jl \
J ~ i
t d!
! \\ 1
1 l/j!
I H'
I III
q
I
.
\; H I it, '.
"I-i+1 Wi
! II ! Iii II \
hf il; in it t, 1
;;.1 .\ ii"> j ;
: 1 [!II III 1/1I
;: ,,11; i \ ~, I '
n~'i\nn{\H
. " , "I' .l " \ I "
; ! ) r I (:\/\\\ 1 i \1
i \: 1, r i' f ~ j, ~ l' \
j,.::,:.,....'),:. 1\\1 PHI
~ t~1D~~
I,.. \; tin i j
I. \ ~,' t,' l\.. ~",:,:
Jill U ii ,'I
UlI,; If iH
H1H .'
tl \H
S..\
'.
~
,
I till
~ i i i .~
I ill i
, nH
I P(l
1 \; \ ~
1 };. ~
I ",
I U U
J Ii 1\
\! ~. ~ , ;'. .
I In;
Hit
,it ,
p
. ,
o
p
-...
,
! .
s
~
~i
!~
I
\
0-
Lf
!2
\')~
\I'"
\.--\-
~
y..
~
~
2:
a
-::t:
7..
z.
'N
.....
t-~
\.-..)
.\\)\\
\)
'i\
20.
\)-
~ \ 11\
Exhibit H
ELEVATION - SOUTH SIDE
.
.,
-D-R-A-F-T-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR CARL AND ALl ZINN
WHEREAS, Carl and Ali Zinn (Applicants) are the owners ofreal property
located at 5820 Ridge Road, City of Shore wood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota,
legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for a variance to construct a three-car attached
garage on the front of their existing home; and
. WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, whose
recommendations are included in a memorandum, dated 30 September 2004, a copy of which is
on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice a public hearing was held and the application reviewed
by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on 5 October 2004, the minutes of which
meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the application at its regular meeting on 25
October 2004, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the Planning Commission's
recommendations were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the Applicants
and from the City staff; and
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Applicants' property is located in an R-IAlS, Single-Family Residential/Shoreland
zoning district, which requires a 50-foot setback from a private road and a 75-foot setback from
Christmas Lake.
2. The property contains 62,339 square feet of area and is occupied by the Applicants'
existing home and attached two-car garage.
3. The Applicants propose to convert the existing garage into living area and build a new
attached garage on the front of the house. The new garage would contain 877 square feet of area.
4. The subject property is bounded on its east side by Ridge Road (a private road) and also
served by a second private road that cuts through the east end of the lot.
..
.
.
5. The property is characterized by dramatic changes is topography, dropping off
significantly to the west, north and east.
6. The property is subject to bluff setback requirements, restricting the buildable area of the
lot.
7. The proposed garage will be 25 feet from the private road
CONCLUSIONS
a. The Applicants have satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under the Shorewood
City Code and have established an undue hardship as defined by Minnesota Statutes.
b. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants to the Applicants a setback
variance to construct the three-car garage as close as 25 feet from the private road.
c. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified
copy of this resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of
October 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
-2-
~
.
.
.
Jl.;~___'_""".'n,.. 0
EXISTING DESCRIPTION . ZINN PROPERTY
That part of Govemment Lot B, Section 36, Township 117, Range 23. described as follows:
Commencing at the center of sold Section 36: thence on a bearing of West along the north line of sold Govemment Lot 8 a distance of 416.70 feet:
thence South 22 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 6.50 feet; thence South 21 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 67.90
feet: thencs South 5 degrees 11 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 60.80 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence
continuing South 5 degree.! 11 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 31.60 feet: thence South 16 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of
128.99 feet; thence North 82 degrees 27 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 195.68 feet; thence North n degrees 46 minutes 15 seconds West a
distance of 234.00 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 29 seconds West to the shore line of Christmas Lake; thencs northerly along said shore line
to the Intersection with a line bearing North 84 degrees 18 minutes 50 seconds West from the point of beginning: thence South 84 degrees 18 minutes 50
seconds East to the point of beginning.
Subject to right-at-way easements and charges for maintaining the .same cis recorded In: Book 824 of Deeds. Page 244; Book 1043 of Deeds. Pages
242 and 244: Book 1052 of Deeds, Page 100: Book 1281 of Deeds,- Page 255, Book 1494 of Deeds, Page 30; Book 832 of Deeds, Page 493: Book 2131 of
Deeds, Page 351: (as to Par 1)
Subject to and together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes B feet wide, the center line of which is described as follows: Commencing at
the center of sold Section 36: thence Westerly along the East-West center line a distance of 420.2 feet to the actual point of commencement of the line
to be described; thence South 28 degrees 17 minutes West. 156 feet; thence South 21 degrees 04 minutes West to the South line 61' above Tract and
there .termlnating. as shown In. deed Doc. No. 549042. Files of registrar of TItles.
Exhibit A
lo,
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331~8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityha!l@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
29 September 2004 ( Revised 21 October - Revisions shown in
itallics )-
RE:
Cassidy, Dick and Kelly - Variance for Impervious Surface
FILE NO.:
405 (04.28)
BACKGROUND
.
Dick and Kelly Cassidy have a purchase agreement to buy the property at 26140 Birch
Bluff Road (see Site Location map -Exhibit A, attached). They propose to demolish the
existing home on the property (Exhibit B) and build a new home as shown on Exhibits C-
J. As proposed, the applicants' plans necessitate a variance to the 25 percent maximum
impervious surface requirement of the Shorewood Zoning Code.
The subject property is located on Lake Minnetonka and is zoned R-1C/S, Single-Family
Residential/Shoreland. At 14,920 square feet in area and 85 feet in width, the lot is
nonconforming. The topography of the site rises approximately 10 feet to where the
existing house sits, then drops off somewhat abruptly, 20 feet to Lake Minnetonka. The
existing home is served by a looped driveway. A brick walkway extends down to the
lakeshore and a nonconforming shed is located in the northeast corner of the site,
approximately 14 feet from the lake. At present, impervious surface on the site amounts
to 33.7 percent of the lot area.
Except for "footprint" size, no information has been provided regarding the total floor
area of the existing home. The new home would contain 8257 square feet of floor area,
divided among three levels. The new home would have a three-car garage with 887
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:#: 8. B.
\,
Memorandum
.. Re: Cassidy Variance
29 September 2004
square feet of floor area. The amount of impervious surface associated with the new
home is29.67 percent. The applicant proposes to mitigate the variance by using a
permeable brick paving system for the driveway. The applicants' request is explained in
Exhibit K.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
A. Substandard Lots. Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.c.(3) addresses development on
substandard lots of record. Following is how the applicants' request complies
with four c!"iteria provided in t!J.at section:
1. The subject property is in separate ownership from the two adjoining'lots.
.
2.
The lotwidth '(85 feet) and lot area (14,920) are at least 70 percent of the
required minimums for the R-1C/S zoning dis,trict, making it a buildable
lot.
3. The proposed house complies with the setback requirements ofthe R-1C/S
zoning district. Proposed hardcover exceeds the 25 percent maximum by
4.67 percent. For this the applicants, have requested a variance.
4. The floor area of all structures on the property will exceed the 30 percent
ration to lot area. With 5787 square feet of house (not including the
basement) and garage, the ratio of all structures to lot area is 38.7 percent.
.
B. Variance Criteria. The applicants' request is explained in a letter from their
architect (Exhibit K), dated 7 September 2004. The letter f~ls to address the
criteria for variances provided in Section 1201.05 of the City Code. There
appears to be nothing physically unique about the subject that prevents the owner
from making reasonable use of it. It seems difficult to claim any kind of hardship
because an 8000 square foot building can not be placed on a 15,000 square foot
lot.
,The arguments in the letter focus on mitigation - reducing the impact of excess
hardcover through the use of a "permeable paving system". Exhibit L
supplements the applicants' letter. These arguments would be more appropriate
in the context of an ordinance amendment. In other words, if this solution is
acceptable for this property, why not for all properties?
Although the applicants have not applied for a text amendment, staffhas done
some research on the subject ofaIternative paving systems. First, the material
supplied by the applicants' architect appears to be limited to how the paver bricks
perform in freeze/thaw conditions. No det~l is provided as to how the system is
engineered.
-2-
I.
Memorandum
Re: Cassidy Variance
29 September 2004
The applicant references a demonstration project funded by the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum. Initial tests of that
system are impressive, but the project has not been around long enough to draw
long-term conclusions. In discussing these systems with the City Engineer and
the City's Engineering consultant, there is still considerable skepticism as to how
the systems work long-term. The systems must be highly engineered, inspected
during construction and ultimately monitored for maintenance. Questions arise as
to how to enforce maintenance agreements. For example, if a system is not
properly maintained and fails in five to ten years, does the City end up in court
trying to achievct compliance from a future owner?
.
We discussed this issue 'with the regional hydrologist from the, Department of
Natural Resources. Although the DNR has begun to encourage the use of
alternative pavements system, they do not recognize them as a means of achieving
impervious surface compliance. These systems should not replace vegetation.
Exhibit M is a"Guidance Paper" distributed by the DNR that sheds some light on
the debate. '
RECOMMENDATION
While the discussion of alternative paving systems deserves further discussion and
monitoring, the verdict is hot yet in. Until such time as the DNR is willing to advocate
these systems, it is not recommended that the City ,accept them as an alternative to green
space. In any event, the applicants have failed to make a case for a variance to the
current requirements. As such, denial of the variance is recommended.
.
Cc:
Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Joe pazandak '
Tim Keane'
Dick and Kelly Cassidy
Lissa Tenuta
At the public hearing" the applicants submitted additional information relative to their
request. This material is forwarded under separate cover.
-3-
~~" 1;C =HW/IT ~8
~ - TG - =9~~ ~.~
r- ~ _r-! U ~
.~~/ ~ ~ ~S~
I I '" .0 ~ .-
'" N'-- ...- 'I :E ~ ~
_ ~ * ~r ~w/ F L '- ~I= &11il u
--= ~ '-= .-...-.- c.. ~ c.--v.4? '- _ t2 ~
'=>- ~ I / L -.I 111111 I ~'-#f\~ \
rrr,,= -- '/ ~v "I(
IT v (YD. ITID-" J-J I
~ / LU.J-J I / . 11\
~,'~ ~~1t-: '- ~~ll ~~- ~ /,
\ "r v 1:. \ \ oil T I -- I ~
~-
~ __1_ :- c- -:G · - kTtOifiJ ~ ~ ·
I[DIDIJ mr JJ)~elJd "
,I - ~:>arqns \:
I V>lN013NNIV\I 3>1'V1 ~3ddn
lee::!' .
000' ~ DOg 09l 0
~ ..
y
N
.
.
\
\
40
I
60
I
FEET
./
...--\
--,
---\
.---,
. ~--
~ \
----
-;:~..J__
/,""""- .\
. lD_..---1--
------\--
~ -\
/i -brq,~ \
'f..'?> \
.. \)~ c'f. \
/"L uV
)1..0
{
~
~
..0.. ,'f.. I
q,&'v
t I
1\ d(ISTING
I ~OUSE
I 1'#26120
II
~ _ _2:7_ _ I
I &,'0.' ""-,
I q,/ I
I / J
~ /
I CO. /
:~ bovm; .
Iq /~~i 800S~
1 ~y DECK 470 SF
1 DRI'l - 1640
~KS- 770' F /
~1 . WALLS- 350 SF
.....~Di . J TAL ::= 5 f?SF I 33.7%
85 ::: 'j
~ / . .
. /
C)/
,/
')"2.0
\
\
\
\
\
\
----
\)"vtt:: '. ;', :":.'.
fFE==953.8 X
I
~~ - - -\- -
27.9' /
/y.
,/ ,
,...... ,../ ,'OJ;,q,,-
4;)qj Ai'
u, ~<o
C!)
11.5
EXISTING
HOUSE
#26140
EHO ~ 1800
EXISTING
HOUSE
#26170
~ /
9J';)'l-'t>r.""- /
''-~'
~
~
<:
\
\
-..../
GFE=945.0
&,';)5)
9>
/
~'? /'
~
/ ~.
,/~~ 0
~~!J 5 13
q,~/I
AI
/' '
/.. ,
~~~
LEGAL DESCRIPT~
EAST 25 FT OF LOT 25, WEST 65 FT
LOT 24, AND THAT PART OF LOT 24,
BIRCH BLUFF UPPER MINNETONKA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN.
ADDRESS = 26140 B~CH BLUFF ROAD
PlOD 29-117-23-43-0025
~ ----
. ~-
I BIRCH
~ -~ --- -
-- --- ~- -
~---~-- ~~-
- ---- -~ -------------
20
o
[
SCALE
IN
. SITEAREA
, 14920 SF / 0.34 AC
X25% = 3730 SF HC
.,..~~~ = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION.
'. X(998.0} = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
,.'
~....
= DIRECTION SURF ACE DRAINAGE
BOOK
. ~ ;g ~ PAGE
~ 0 g 28. 2004
S' "= g:
{Jq tr:l .....
(') ~ to RTlFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREP
0"" NOER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
::s ~ \ DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
0........ ..AWS Of THE STATE Of t.INNESOTA.
~lZl
Sa- d
.... ~ ~DARE1:.LE REG, NO. 6508
cn~
<
BUILDING
PERMIT SURVEY
CASSID Y RESIDENCE
STONEWOOD DES/GN
SfI\ Land
Frank R; Cardarelle Surveyor
6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
952-941-3031
'-""
.
.
"
.i .'
. ,
~
{
~
~
~",~i- .;.
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
)
/
~~~
- -
11.5
Proposed Hardcover
EXISTING
HOUSE .'
#26170
House
Garage
Driveway
Front porch
Patio
Total Hardcover:
Percentage:
2,060.00
887.00
1,180.00
140.00
160.00
4,427,00
29,67%
'1-C)..~:t
29.5
.It) - - - -' -1- -
. ,i-
't- t.>" .'
tv...... ~
'-J. I "
'"
9";)?,.o"
/,
'--"""
~
'Q::
.~
~
\
'\
'v
-..a.' .
-..a./
~/
/
35
!6IRCH '
o '20
L II
.SCALE
40 60
I I
IN FEET
- - - - --~-
_ d ~ ,_ -
LEGAL'DESCR/PTJeN: ).' ~'. SJ,TEAREA
EAST 25 FT OF LOT 25, WEST 65 FT . 1.4.9,20 'SFl 0.34 AC
LOT 24, AND THAT PART Of Lor 24, X2-5% = 3730 SF HC
BIRCH BLUFF UPPER MINNETONKA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN.
ADDRESS = 26140 BIRCH BLUFF ROAD
PIDI 29-117-23-43-0025
.,..~~ == ..EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION.
X(998.0) == PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
. . .
"""'....... == DIRECTION SURFACE DRAINAGE
PROJECT NO. 800K
BUILDING.
PERMIT SURVEY
CASSID Y RESIDENCE
. .
STONEWOOD DESIGN
. . .tI\ land
Frank R~ Cardarelle Surveyor
6440 FLYING. CLOUD DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
952-941.....3031
DATEJUL Y 28, 2004 PAG
REVISIONS
FY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED
~ MY DIRECT SUPERVlSIOH AND
lZl tr.l Ul Y REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
~ ~ IS OF THE STATE OF t.fINNESOTA.
- ....
l-~ a' .
"'C :=.' AREl:.LE: REG, NO. 6508
t'"4(')
>-
Z
--
1 -""
.'
.'
"\ --,..
i'
.
;,~
~
\"
fl;
, .
.
1
~"'N t::...sP~ I,
~. l y2. .:s; -r
I(IG? ~~. IIiof.' 1'/ -f."-'
1
I
I
_.t:.Nf?:! ./2..
fO~::-
,
I
f
~
kilJ..hI ~
:: -l.q..r~ 7l:\. .:.::.
- -". ._.,.._...,.~~.:..-::t.';;';_':'.I""~
f-
f'2.,./
..'.......
'/"!,
/ I '
"'.,/ ;,
". ./ ".\
~"'. ~. . I
.......~ 1 \
~., . i
/" ; i
..Ji i I
.~ \.
-: ! I
I
.\
.~ '.
... .... l.
\d~..
'-.
~.'
'~I
(6 I
..:.-t-
..
'.
.
",
-.-r '1 ~-i-.'" ..F-~' .,~
.__ "~/ 'f) ".~ ~ ~ '. P 11004.' . 61'-4pt.,. p~ ~.~ )
_' '.' . CP.J'1 ~~!.~~~~o", .....__ .pO
14p . ~F t F~ioJ.-r ptP.~A .
__,., :' 14r;, 'f~., f"t'r1'" I R
Exhibit D
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
P L-..&2 d.. _~
po t....... h, ~
. ..~.~ .? 7-. l. 1::2~
~ r;?'~
H <?~,,,
'Y1/~L~ ,-.
,./.
'-
.......,
'...~ ".-
;;:-'<,
,....//'. ....~
U4.~
...4.....
.VV.::t: .
'fP\N i1'-"f
__,~ 'fQ.tt..i.,..,.
~. ~~;~-.,
"""-4f;
--L. ' ...--
---- -. ~..
-.' '--___~i.. .. '
-.-- .,...- -::"1-. rj"""'"" -
, 'I :, 'I I.. .
'I' 1(. " II
II bt..1I Ll ! ~ II .
I ~---"'....
I ' 'flJc)C 1\ ...... II
t, Cft'}!' "1J I
I ,
f'kfVO /1?e c-f{
, .
.- ~I- __ ___+
~
~~~'",&eOfl1....
(vtJ~t4 .)
(~)C ~ r ('p
Po~i~-
o
... 'n ..~__.~._. _u..,.
J4... P.1./mJ .
.
. .
o
o
,I<'
.
,
;~t.
.,......'~.
'0. r"'~11
j..
r '
,
"
", ';~...~
~tl .'.
d~ '_,... ,.~__._
..
21V~1 ~lc&_._,
, "2.0 7' "l, ,
--=z.-.~, ~-o,.t:U2..,_ " F ~ 0 0 ~
'1-.080 ~f I FIN.
4-eo 0 "Of I e.ON v~ l'l..M" \I t'J y'N
'.
'~o'O
0...,'
.:"
"P->
^".-- -
"'V 1l\-1<.\
.'
Co}.\ Cr ~ f'-r.~
7 ~ c,o t-\ P ?- L. 00 e:.
I/?J~l riP., Y+:'~'''-/'F't"J... ' .
Exhibit E
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
f "A N.
'?A,t?? I DY..u
4 Dc..- .
HOM"$
1-/7/ '1-00 t
.
.
..
..-----.
I
I
I
I
~_f~.r_.TaJ:H' M"
"l '1.)Co ~ Vo
e.)(.~~'&1e .
1~'lC 11"
C. e' N C- t=: ~,. ~,
.~AS~He.N ,..
.. I/t; 0(1.. V+" I Fl.
~-
fl,.,A~
I ~k\'.
L-~_
. __ V.t:I ~ X~4 .'
~A~~[PY
c;,pc.
\tOMe.
1/1+ lot-
~.f?~ ~ M'P.N.T......
.~s.a.._.~...J?lN .(rNCk $Pr~
J.
Exhibit F
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
-.,
Z;~:M1 ~
'~~
..... ..~.. "......'~'.~.
I
,', \ i
. \tI '1
~\I
~ : \i~
i \i~
1i ~
'1 Itl~
JI I i l\il~
~ \ 1\1 i
~ . 1 \ II
i ! I ;
. -l \Ii i I 1
.~ U iii
II :1 ~ ! \ 1
'n:
~ I i~ !
" !! 1\.1 !
I 1~ I
. I i..-r i
\ I ; . 1
. l I i
'111 IiI
I ~I ! i~-:
--~ : . ,-+
i \ i~~
1~",~
~ ~ \1)~
Ii:
I ! .
I
I
.
.
..(-:a~: ~d. '.~~ _...... _
Exhibit G
BUILDING ELEVATION - FRONT
-
. -
-
I
- - I
I i
I
. J)
1 ,
J I
J
jl
),l
i
I' '
1.1
II
. II
I
I,
I ;:
-. '--
~ ~
~~
~
II .,~
-
-. -
-.- .
- --
Exhibit H
BUILDING ELEVATION - REAR
~
~
(J
~~
, ~
7 "Ii==::::~'- --~:~;>'i"Z'$-
.~
~ ..."
. .I.:
~~
(1',
- I
, I i
...
.
.
!
,I
~I
,~
'~
.~
I
: i . i
i I I~~
'Ff j~!~
' l\'\.!
! j'l)l
, Ml
I~ I
I~'I' ~
I~ \'I I
I~!
1'1
I ,
I i
,
I : I
I !I
I I !
I, i I
, I
I I
j !
I ,
III
I \-1 :
I~ j
I~,I~
I t,j ~i
~~I
.I~, \Jl
~I I
l..J - i
TT -,
~U~
\) 'tl tlj
~~l~
\11 -I
I I
Exhibit I
BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST
.
.
~_.O\
~
"
~---- _.
: :
" ,
" ~i
lul~
i.t: ~i
! \\:'-J
1 1:b~'
~ iti'~
\ .
I !
: i~
~ [\hI
I !~l
II l~
i i'"
: I
LI
~ ~ I,
I: I
dl
i J i i
~T l~
h, I ~l i
\1 I ~!
: ~ I ~ ~
l~ ~~~
h 1Il~1 ~
i \ \ ~ ,1
I i '3 ~
I i ~
I
I
Exhibit J
BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST
.
.
d~sitt n&t
gcompany
Zoning Application Description
26140 Birch Bluff Road
PIN: 29-117-23-43-0025
September 7, 2004
The Cassidy's are requesting a variance for the use of permeable pavers for construction
of their driveway to mitigate the percentage of impervious surface on the lot. The
applicants request the thoughtful consideration of the Planning Commission regarding
progressive ways of improving existing non-conformities and sub-standard structures.
The Cassidy's have entered into a purchase agreement with the present owner of the
property, and are currently in the process of designing a home to reduce and remove the
existing non-conforming structures, including the home, a shed or boathouse on the
lakeshore, brick paths to the lake, and a large circular driveway. The current impervious
surface on the lot equals 33.7%.
Should the applicant's request to improve the property by removing the existing structures
and all existing impervious surface on the lot be favorable to the Planning Commission
and the City Council, the Cassidy's would be willing to go above and beyond the current
water management requirements. 26140 Birch Bluff Road has been a lot of record since
at least 1900; the existing home was built prior to the current restrictive zoning codes and
has fewer square feet than the present ordinance requires for the Shoreland District.
They would like to remove the existing house built in 1900, and replace it with a more
energy efficient, mold-free home fitting with the character of the neighborhood, while
reducing the impervious surface currently on the lot. Even given the fact the lot was
recorded prior to the present codes, the design of the new home meets all zoning
requirements for the city of Shorewood with the exception impervious surface, and the
use of permeable pavers in place of asphalt and concrete walkway material would reduce
the amount of impervious surface to meet the city's requirements. Without the use of
permeable pavers, the proposed design concept still reduces the impervious surface
currently on the lot by 3%, down to 31 %.
By using permeable pavers in place of asphalt for the driveway, the impervious surface
would be reduced to meet the zoning requirements of the city of Shorewood. Current
research by the Environmental Protection Agency, watershed districts all over the
country, and manufacturers of the products shows that the use of permeable pavers not
only mitigates the water runoff, but reduces specific types of pollutants (such as metals,
nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment) and has less thermal impact than asphalt surface on
the surrounding surface waters. The legislation developed by the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources for the shore land areas specifically targets storm water
management as the foremost objective, and specifies the issues these pavers were
designed to mitigate.
464 Second Street Suite 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 952.470.
Exhibit K
APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER
Dated 7 Sept. '04
.
.
In addition to the use of permeable pavers in place of an asphalt drive, the Cassidy's are
willing to utilize progressive techniques for storm water management. The use of a
trench drain at the end of the drive leading to a drain tile system and/or collecting the
water from the roof to be distributed to a drain tile system at the foundation will further
improve the lot conditions.
The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, together with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District, has installed a 38 space parking lot at the Arboretum to test the drainage
capacity of permeable pavers. We have received permission to demonstrate the water
infiltration capacity of the parking lot, and are prepared to provide the demonstration to
Shorewood in person or via videotape.
While considering the request of the Cassidy's, please reflect on the multitude of ways in
which they are endeavoring to improve this property and demonstrating their commitment
to making their property healthier and more aesthetically pleasing for the environment,
the community and their family.
261 School Avenue Suite310 Excelsior, MN 55331
Phone: 952.470.9750 Fax: 952.470.8407
. f '7rfJA'
'tl.i.{['l
'y.,1't ,
,"!" ",;' ~~, 1f,~',', /' '~~",i"
. ~,...,.., I
I"I""'~" "
I, " ..
I~":.." Ii, )\-N
.-', ,.~ '"
'i~
'\.,t..~.~....
\' \v"~
: I ^
! ,
~
~
~
00
~
00
~
Z
~
>
~
~
~
~oo
'; _0
, .-< ~
:So
..c:=::
~~
1
~
.:,,",.
lilt;;; ',:
,".
. ,,' .....
"
QC-Ol'
QUARTER CI RCLE
".' ,
T5-01
THIN STRAIGHT
QC-01
QUARTER CIRCLE
-
'COBBl.E
SYSTEMS
":".J ;:J...;Ji;;I~p.J:Jq~pq
:.J :JDt:l\tELJiJ ::JWll3G:l
":J E2:J:UDLJ2L.Ji;JijE10
.. .:JUDD:J:J:.JJC:JCltil'2J ..
*
.
~~8B=~~~~8
a :JDi.J~iLj~:JlJWl1Jl:)W
.
~i&L~~~!Cf
.1JUW8~2JJJ8!fl~w)~
.
lm~ftJll~ir4 ~ llil2ttl f!lmlE!! ~ ~m l!l~~~ i:mtwriiliiIDWli1
m~~~gm~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~&~e.
ilJilal
~lB.
;&;l@~ ~gmhm!iJ~lliJ?i]iliJilll~H:l
ij::!ii5l~t?Sill1... [l1l~mt1JtfJd2ltiJ, ...
ID~~~B~~~w~~~~ ~&m
:ld ?!:J'~::;;J lili3 tlJHrtilBlil'l C1~ ~jillj tifJ ~!'lHliIl
-"'~""""""^"'''.. 'I'" -oOfiI.""..'!"!..".".-..,..........__
.,;,p-~!~e t.zJf!!fJfJtJ "<ir~q"""""-o!J>-~'lll'l'''''
. .
.
...
.
.
.... -i>d)... t:S;~ €$\'IlI
YJ:l~Zi2lSllEJ~n'I~IUt
~~~
~.. .
!~ . . f!!!I''''', b'!*.... ,>.'~ .' '<I~l
~lf5'b~ 4l!Jo4 "'<il:."" ...,,,,,'"",",,, ,~l6
liWil WiliQliU!& ~ !;L:l :tLHi.ll g] !iW
~~~-~"'~~~'" ~.'. '~,:~~"~'~,M1'ltI'~ ~.""I',"'~~,I"."" ",,',~''1l.~'"''''\\1"iJ'...''' \ ,"':',~'''"w.itr.~ :Jf;.'r/l.'*~".:..' .. '. ~;~~
~ PATTERN DIMENSIONS. SQUARE FT.. APPROX.
Ii (I N CM) a (SQUARE WEIGHT
!
, METRES) LBS a (KG) ..,
~
f. 48"x16"x15/B" 5.25 sq. ft. 70lbs 30
u SP-01
i (120 x 40 x 4) 0.5 m2 32 kg patterns/pallet
i
t FS-01 48"x16"x15/B" 5.25 sq. ft. 70lbs 30
~ (120 x 40 x 4) 0.5 m2 32 kg patterns/pallet
f.
~ FS-02 48"x16"x15/B" 5.25 sq. ft. 70lbs 30
I
i (120 X 40 X 4) 0.5 m2 32 kg
!
I HC-01 48"x24"x15/B" 7 .92 sq. ft. 105 Ibs 15
P- (120 X 60 X 4) Q.75 m2 48 kg
i
i QC-01 4S"x24"x 15/8" 7.92 sq. ft. 1 05 Ibs 15
I (120X60x4) 0.75 m2 48 kg
TS-01 24"x16"x3/4" 2.64 sq. ft. 181bs
i. (60 X 40 X 2) 0.25 m2 S kg
L"w",,', . ....~,..t',\'"."''''.,,~~;:%:...:. ;..:,m,:..,..". ., \".";'~~~ '~\I1'fI;~-"~
. " .
)~'w/ SUGGESTED APPlICATION~.~
~~~~~~i.:,~:~. ~~~.. . . '~._~;
::;:'1 ,.:. ",.,,/,' DX" . "'en' or .
" ~ ~ ~ '-I
,;:", .ll"~; " . ,. .
::"::":.dri:veway~, waJkways, patios"pOol 8Ul'l'Ci
+~:~:"porches, erosion control
<~t..; :;.~. ',.
lPf''i-: .."j",terior. . ..c"
"';';:.\~'::kitchens,>wine cellars, rec rooms, s<?Ia.Ii,~
".7 "1,,'
':" '. . '~:..' ,'.,
~.\\.. '~o."'m" m";;:'-oa'l "",.,.,:/,T
. ~.~ .:....,.".,~1.\.Ji .~. "'~ . _ ~. ". C;.' '{';/":
. ...,"., auto deale~l1ips, showrOoms,pars, b~~d'~~:'d
restaurants, flower shops, shopping mall~,'.. , .
" golf paths, etC.,'~1
C ~ Q I S w r d ,...., Fr'r- ru ~ ~ ~ ~ a ' " . "
ooole vste~ns ~tast an~ trru~~ent ~nstahalJOn
u
EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS
INTERIOR APPLICATIONS
Lay sheets down on
prepared base.
Prepare base as you
would for a standard
paver installation.
'Run compactor over stone
surface and wet application
priorto filling joints.
Use 3/4" cobble for indoors. Apply sheets over
suitable adhesive on subfloor, wood or conaete.
Wet and fill with Cobble Systems'TM silica epOxy
mortar (SEM)*. Squeegee and broom lightly.
*Priur to installalion please refer to Cobble Systemsftl silica epo:cy
mortor (SEM) instructions on package. '
Apply Cobble SYStems'TM
water permeable silica
epoxy mortar (SEM)*.
Joints can also be filled with
other materials such as
course sand, stabilized
sand or fine gravel.
t
~1If
i";
:r~ ;-
I#J
~
'.!>i
J.~
~fr
e8/11/2ee4 14:B3
4B78435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE B2
'~
UNIVlRUl
Project No.: 13580.001-01
Date Typed: July 12, 2('104
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
COI'Isullanla in: Geotechnical El1dlneering Threshold Inspection
Environmental Sciences. Construellor, Materlars Teslfng
Field and Laboratory Report Cover Page
Client!
Cobble Systems
. AUn: Tal Shurord
100 West Livingston Street
Orlando. Florida 32801
. Project:
Cobblestone Pavers, L.abqratory Testing, Orange County, Florida
As requested. a representative Of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) was at the referenced project to provide
construction materials testing services.
"'-""
Seopeo, Work
J541
S"x12" Concrete Test S ecimen - FinallsslIe
, ~i'?i~i(~l
The results of the observations and/or tests are summarized on the attached sheets. We hope this information Is
.umcienl to< yoo, Immediate needs. If you have any questions. ple..e do nol hashale 10 conlad the unde"l,ned.
cc: Client (2)
, . Reviewed By,
Universal" E':1g:nep.r1ng ScIences, Inc.
{V~"1P? --Z\
Thomas E. Whitney; P.E.
Asst. Dept. Manager - Consfructio
Signature Date~ 1/12/04 .
STA TE OF FLORIDA. ~
Professional Engineers No. 58811
'---..
\ttachments (1)
!c
",.""- ...
.08/41/20e4 14:B3
4B78435753
~ORATE OFFICE
PAGE 03
Project No.:
UNIVERSAL ~feof~7:~~e:
ENGINEERING SCIENCES Date Z""lssue:
. G h .' IE' I E J t ,s : Dale 3h1 Issue:
Consultants In: eotec nlca nglneer ng. nv ronmen a .. clenees ..P_a.tIt!~J~.:!!ue:
Construction .Materials Testing · Threshold Inspection · Private ProviUlfBPlft\re:
3532 Maggie Blvd. · Orlando, FI 32811 . (407) 423-0504 · F3JC (407) 423-3ftuee Revised:
1358Q..001-0 1
J541(349146.6)
June 7, 2004
June 11, 2004
June 1lJ, 2004
June 29, 2004
July 6. 2004
July 12, 2004
Client:
, Cobble Systems
Attn: Tal Shuford
100 West Uvingston Street
Orlando, FI~rida 32801
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
4" X 81t CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS
(ASTM C-39)
Project:
Cobblestone Pavers, Laboratory Testina, Orange County; Florida
structu...t J:lement: NIS
sample Location: HIS
# 4 of 4 totat nts.
Samptad From: NlS
SiIIIlPled By: I C/Ierlt
.' Generallnformalion
General ConlraCfOl': NIS
Air Content: N/S %
Other I Comments:
S SI 1rmws
SpilQfied stl'lll1gth: 8,~,OOO psi at 28
days.
Milt Design. :StrongCh: NlS fl5l.lIt 28 days.
Water Added at Site: NJS ttIs.
DilleIT'me Belched; 6-2-0.1. NIS
Dalelllllle Sampled: 1'1I5
WeaCher Condition: Nt
Field Test Results
NIB in. Ambient Tern NIB -F
Pour Informa6on
Truc:l( load: NlS cu yds,
Cumulative Quantity;
Total Pour for (he IJ .
Supplier: IIIfS
Truct Number: NJS
.'0....-/ Ticket Number. HIS
M ill; Design Nwnber: N/S
Admixture:
Concrete Tern
.
Mex. ~'T~
Age Ty.pe Df Weight.. Test s,ecimen C~sIv. Compressive
Date Tested (days) FracfQre '~ X-'~Area Load 11bs.) $trerigth (psi) Average (psi)
SULTS 6-3-04 1 2 8.69 12.93 49.260 3810
of . 6-3-04 1 2 .. 8.85 1~.es 50 430 3,920 3870
LAFS 6-9004 7 2 8.80 12.81 94.350 7.370
TESTING 6-9-0.. 7 2 S.SS 12.78 96.190 7,540 1,460
6-'8-04 '4 2 8.77 12.72 101.110 7950
6-16-04 14 2 8.53 12.44 '02.810 8,250 8.100
6-23-04 21 2 .8.69 12.72 115.470 9080
0-23-04 21 2 8..8-4 12.79 119.290 9,330 9,210
6-3().04 28 :I 8.83 12.66 118.630 9.370
6.30-04 28 2 8.82 12.73 112,580 8840 9,110
:EMARI(S 'Note: AU informatiOn t= 10 concrete ~ SUJ1p, water. class, e1c Ilong wIIh CliISting the tQt .~ _8 prepared by lhe d1enl.
UniIIersaI EngineefInQ ciences i& only 1'lIB/3OIlSIblf: for the eorRpress/ve 8lrenglh lat
7f '!l f/1 D
~,--..,JJ ~ ~
$........ 10 ,uN C-172 . Unlmown
MaIdeIf 10 c-3t. ~
~ Clftd to ASTM c.:., - \JII/Inown
CunocI6 Tested ill L8IJlo ASTM C.lt & 0-39 . Va
This Fonn Conforms With ASTM C-39
one. 2 = Cl>>le & ,Split, 3" Oone & Sheili', of = l5hear, 5 = C..lumn2T
IDld. CS . Co",.. Br..k .
'RevIsions.,. sIlown In bold l",d It.lles.
'\1 .<'!"'.C? ~~._~/S)
08/11/20a4 14:03
,
~078435753
COR~Ale U~~l~~
r "'YO..
Project No.:
UNIVERSAL ~:feofM7:~~e:
ENGINEERING SCIENCES . Dilte Z""lssue:
, Date 3h1 Issue"
Consultants in: Geotechnical Engine~rlng · Environmental Scienees ..P~a.t't 4'" ~:!!ue;
Construction ,Materials Testing · Threshold Inspection · Private ProviUfJa't8'F~e:
3532 Maggie Blvd. · Orlando, FI 32811 . (407) 423-0504 . Fax (407) 423-3lPttf! Revised:
13580.001-01
J541(349146,6)
June 7, 2004
June 11, 2004
June 1lJ. 2004
June 29, 2004
July 6, 2004
July 12, 2004
Client:
. Cobble Systems
Atln: Tal Shuford
100 West Livingston Street
Orlando, FI~rida 32801
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
4" X 8" CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS
(ASTM C-39)
Project:
Cobblestone Pavers, Laboratory Testing, Orange County; Florida
Structural ~lement: NlS
Sample Location: HIS
# 4 of .. total sets.
Slmptad From: N/S
Sampled By: I CIler1t
"Genera' Information
Genet.' Contractor: N1S
Pour Information
TrUC:k load: N/S cu yds,
Air Content: N/S %
Other Rel8llts , Comments:
Times
8,000-9,000 psi at 28
days.
Mhc Design"Strength: HIS P5i lit 28 days.
Water Added ai S<<-: IIIIS a1s.
DafefTlme Bitched,: 6-2-04. NIS
DeleJiltlle SlI11pled: NlS
Weather CondO ion: 5
Field Test Results
N/S in. Ambient Tern N/S -F
Cumulative Quantity:
'Tota Pour for the DI ,
NlS cu yda,
Nts
Supplier. Nts
Truck Nllmber: NlS
'-........,' Ticket Number: NIS
M illi Dellig" Nqmber. NIS
Admixture: t
Concrete Tern
.
MIx. ., 'Test
Age Ty.pe of Weight u Test Specimen Compressive Comprtissive
Oate Tested (days) Fractltre recr:~lfld x-sect1i)A.rea Load Ilbs.) Strength (pSi) A\lerage (psi)
(Ibs (in'
eSUL TS 6.3-04 1 2 1.69 12.93 411,260 3810
of ' 6.HM 1 2 ; 8.85 12.85 50,430 3920 3.870
LAS 6-9-04 7 2 8,80 12.81 94,350 7.370
TESTING 6-9-04 7 2 8.66 12.78 96,190 7,540 7,460
6-16-04 14 2 an 12.72 101.110 7950
6-16-04 14 2 8.63 12,44 102.610 8,250 8,100
6-23-04 21 2 . e.69 12.72 115470 9080
6-23-04 21 2 8.84 12.79 119.290 9,330 9,210
6-30-04 28 2 8.83 12.66 118,630 9,370
6-30-04 28 2 8.~ 12.73 112,580 8,840 9,110
:EMARK$ lNota: All informallon Crfinent to concrete pIacemenI, alLlmj), water. class, e1c along wIlh CliI!Iling the te" lipecimerll; WB8 prepared by the client.
Unillersa! Engineertng cieltCe$ 16 only re&ponslb.. lor lhe compressiVe lIItrenglh lest
J~ [21 B []
S_p/ed 10 ASTM c..172 . UnJmown
MoIdecr 10 c-31 . Unknoll""
tnlli"'" Cutetl... ASTM C.:11 . UIIknown
OutlOd .. TeSI.d In Lab 10 ASTM C.11 & C-39 . vea
This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39
one. <I = eo", & Spllf, 3" Oone & She..-. .. .. 5hur, 5 = Columnar
lold. CS .. CamerSreek '
'Rell/sion..,.. sIIown 'II bOld I",d IraUe..
"II (W.O. No. N/S)
. I.. .. ..._..
88/11/2884 14:03
4878435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE 84
_ AIR z..
FRCRJUCTS ~~
1V_..__...:.CL:.............'ln~...do' .......".............. .......";'.~.. :.r'....l~. ....,-1-\.. _, ',' J'. ....-...........;.":.....~ ...:..... ....:. ..:....:.....~._....-:..........
.0:",,' h...:..:.....:....;:O.."....:._...... 0:- ...-....."t::O.:....+,r:"~:-).....f::r.."!'....J..."\I...
'--'"
Air Products and Chemicals. Inc.
7201 Hamillon Boulevard
Allentown, PA 18195-1501
Telephone (610)481-4911
June 6, 2004
Mr. Tal Shufol'd
Cobble Systems me.
100 West Livingston Street
Orlando. Florida 32801
Dear Tal:
1l11:espoJlse to a request from R9ben: Fono118. Pilgrim PCI'1f.lACoat IllC., we have tested ceme"tit;olls cobble stone
sllI'llplcs and gIO\ll:ed cementitiolls cobble stonc samples for water nbsorption in acCordance with ASTM C 67-97,
Standard Test .Methods for Sampling .l\11d Testillg Blick 9\'Id Stl'UCturaJ Clay.
T~t Procedlu'c
.
Pliol'to tc:S1ing, each sample was equillbrllted at nOr 150%. RH for 24 hours.
Sample weight was measuJ."ed to 0.1 gm acC'Ul'acy using a, M~ttler Toledo Mod.e! SO 3200] electr?bala:nce.
Samples were f'lllly ;ti,mC!scd in deion;zcd water at 720'F. for 5 houl's, then removed, wiped witb a ch\lnp cloth, and re-
weighed. Results tire Ji,ted in the table below: .
.........."
Sample Initial Wt. ,Pi"al Wt. /:'1:a0 absOlption
Cobble Stone
#1 581.3 592,5 1.9%
#2 503.8 518.3 2.9%
#3 553.6 576.9 4.2'~fl
#4- 670.2 692.7 3,4';0
#5 689.5 7J4.8 3.7~'.o
#6 460.8 481.5 4.5%
#7 728.9 746.4 2.4%
average 3.3t!"o
Grouted Cobble Stone "251 4 . 3381.5 4.0%
Block .J .
.
, No physical chfll,lge, dnmage, cracking, or loss of matcl;nJ was observed .for IIllY of the samples.
Please call.me at 610-481-6277 if you. have a-ny questions.
Sincerely yours,
~~~~
............
David D\lbowik
Pdncipal Applications Chemist
Epoxy Additives TeehnieaJ Service Department
Perfol'mance Chemicals Division
Air Products &; Chemicals Inc.
68/11/2664 14:03
\
4078435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE 65
............. Air Products & Chemicals Inc.
.
.
Date:
Subject:
July 12, 2007
Preliminary Results: Freeze Thaw Cycling of Cobble Systems Samples
Background: Seven samples of synthetic cobble .stone and one sample of grouted block
containing four synthetic cobble stones and epoxy based mortar are being tested. The samples
are being subjected to 50 Freeze~ Thaw cycles in accordance with ASTM test procedure C--67-
97
Test Procedure -Each sample was completely immersed in water for 4 hours then transferred to
a pan containing ~D of water and placed in a freezer at -roc for 20 hOUrS. The samples are
moved to room temperature to thaw for 4 hours then retumed to the freezer. Each freeze-thaw
cycle includes 20 hours at -7"C and 4 hours' at 22-C. .
Testing will continue for 50 cycles or will stop prematurely if samples exhibit either.3% weight
loss or visual destruction of the samples.
Results - Weight Change
Initial 4 Hr H20
Immersion
11 Freeze-Thaw
Cycles
1.6%
1.6%
0.2%
1.4%
0.9%
,=,0,4%
0.4%
2.2%
Total Weight Change
..........,.
Sample #1
Sample #2
Sample #3
Sample #4
Sample #5
Sample #8
Sample #f7
Mortared Block
1.9%
2.9%
4.2%
3.4%
3.7%
4.5%
2.4%
4.0%
3.5%
4.5%
'4.4%
4.6%'
4.6%
4.1%
2.8%
6.2%
Results _ After 24 freeze-thaw cycles, there is no evidence of cracking or damage to any of the
samples
Summary - All the samples have gained weight. approXimately 3-6% after the initial immersion
and approximately 1..2% additional weight gal" after 11 freeze-thaw cycles. -
One sample, sample #6 has shown a slight weight. loss during freeze-thaw cycling.
After 24 freeze-thaw cycles, norie of the samples shows any signs of cracking, deterioration, or
physical failure." .
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call me at 610-481-6277 or
e mall dubowid@C!Dcl.com
Sincerely yours,
Dave Dubowik
Epoxy. Additives Technical Service Department
..........
68/11/2004 14:03
4078435753
IjlJl<t"Ul'(H II:. ur...L '-'C.
"'E5r Ie!! INC
, GeOTECHNICAL & MAiERIALS
,'--'" ENGINEERING, TES1lNG & INSPECilON
'O,80X "7'" ,...."''^, rt.oIUO^ ~'4." $'3trn.'",
PROJECT: Prod\lct Check
EPOXY STl~ENGTIl TEST
(2" x 2" CUBES)
DATE:
June 8, 2004
PROJECT NO:
TL-4~51
CLIENT:
Pilgrim Pem'locotlt, Inc.
f..AB NO:
67714
.. SA.1\oIPLING OA.V.
LOCATION OF CO~CRETE:
Batch:; 7469
SA.:vlPLED: DATE:
TIME:
BY:
6102/04
BATCH TICKET INFOaMAT!Ol'l
.
'rE~rPERA TIlRE - Am.:
MIX:
OF
of
TRUCK NO:
TICKET NO:
PLAJ."lT:
STRENGTH:
MIX:
ct1Bxc YARDS:
TIME - .BA TCBED:
Clten~
SLUMY:
INCHES
AIR CONTENT:
WATER-ADDED:
'.1\1 JOB SiTE)
'"'-'1..\1'& RECEIVED AT LABORATORY:
%,
GALSI
Cy
Delivered by e1ie\1,t 6/07/04
~-,-
TEST DATA
.
I SET AGE I DATE CURING TOTAL DIAMETER AREA STRENGTH TYPB
NO. (days) TESTED METHOD LOAD (lbs.) (ill.) (SQ. in.) CDsi) FAILURE
I lS-A 6 6/07 LAB '9000 --- 4.0 I 2250 ---
S 6 6/01 LAB 6900 'M' 4.0 l725 ---
C 6 6/01 LAB 8500 u_ 4.0 2125 --
I I I I
i I
R~J>ORTS 'ro:
Pilgrim l>crmOCD8t, Inc.
Altn: Robert Forlong (2)
CUIUNO: L.L^!: ."'-AIR: l"-flELD:
FL-FIELD &.1..AB; U.UNKNOV..-N
TYPE OJ: r,'\n.~: SH-SHaA\l.: SC-SHEA.R CONE:
SP.SPtIT: "-OTHER
'-..-
I~.j/l-t
TEST LAB. INC.
dtVS7714. t5
......
~
~
-:!
-
.... t V1
Sl ....
V ..
'i ~
w ...
l!:l ...,~
([ ~'.o ~
11.
-:f
-,r:.
< -
:::t ""'
oJ ,
.' .
U' ..
c:..,.. li:
0 --
~ ~
~ ")
0
I.LI 6- '-I t
u \,j
.... ,J
~ .)
,0 C
'-'
I.LI
~ .-1
I -
.
--.-
\..(l
N
C
('t) I
It) N
,.. Q
It) 0
('t)
V 0
IX) C
,..
tSl .:)
V ::::
.:3
c::
CI
('t) 'iij
CS) G
'<:I' Q
.-I
~.
'o:t Iii
~.O'
tSl --.
tSl ~ii
N .. ,II.
.... I!t
.-I
.....
......-
IX)
CS) )
,...
.:.:
o
at:
m
Cl
c
oS;
CO
0.
(J
E
~<<I
.e~
c-
0-'=
:weD
cu-
(J..J
!f:-a
UC
CDm
Q.C
0aJ
"0-
~~
lU....
-o11l
eCD
m"'a
_CD
00..
'i;-t
....:
:l ~
>.c.
..Is..
-5~
.. u
9~
: :;
ici
.. ~
.2 ~
i~
oi:
'II:;
~:j
.S'i
t II
:i~~
-l!>
,b.0
iU . is.
.!.5 :r
"'=' ~.. ..
!! .. ~
1>'" ~
,~ Ii :
lJC:.s;
.o<~
ggf!
-- ~
~ .; .!!
-=2!u
iotlA-=
......
...-..
u -o.!
":Coo
.gl!.l1!'
fi~ .fi
'a .-
~.Bi
i'~-i
.....0
..'Oi
-Sltl
~9i
Ii.e 1
"D a'-
10- ...
.,.. ............
.!! 0 5
'!!'~1
'! ... ..
ii.~
!-- ~
.~'!. &
~'iS ;
.to
~
t>
S ...
() ~
~'O ~
'C tl ,~
...1I1.: 1::
~ l) 1; 'S
~ O'r; ..
-a ii:"U ~
U)_~ '"
S'5 s ]
.~ ~'= ~
"~J;l :>
~.5 -<(
aM.... a
~~~ ~
..c'1:j 0
~.g 0 ~
!~-U"co~
:i' .- ~ &:: 2
lI)~-'Q~
e~~';V,l
::s -"'....
:<;eac'tl......
O-c.....5N
en....vtI)-
(JU (J
OJ;! if e ,ss
e.. 'c." J:>r>
oE .0 s: "cI::
- d I) ~ "''1:j
~J~ -:!" ;::I'll
.. > a 3 H
~ti ~ - .. '5 0
~ ~ f'~ ii l3.
-a'" .. >< ...~
11)01 ""02..::
~E::<.i ;;I~.. 'O~
=olS ~-02 .._
~ite! "";.., 't:l~
,,~- "llI .....i..
D ~ Jt.L!-a...-o
~ oW ~ is ~ c 6 ,= '1:
'ifUoo a'i.a-s
'C I c~. '. 'i' III 8.S
oS:> _ i1e~t:l~.e
f' -e 'C B I: C 'C t)
'> ,. i r .~ 1 ~
~; . ~.r~ t~
~.!: ;i"'lil~
~-5 god! i
-a"'''llI 0'" >>.;
.::" 0 _ .... to: ~ ~ co p
.....lz:.a__ t)....; i5o..; e!
-.fi 3 ...; ..; .l) ...: U ~ 13 ';3
~ > .a""; ~ ~~.- flI'\ .- 4.i
t.t:; E e "i!
t:l
Q
~
III
U
!Ii
..
cr
.0
M'
~ l;! a '0 ~ ~ .:. ;:0,.
-,." "c::u.o
a)~=III.a&
'" '- ft! U ~ .. en "S
;I "5.~ E U. t
.. :. "'it': i Z'1; >
.2 JS ~ l? "j -a B
Ql) C -0 ..
"3=t'll~,i"b;!
'8 ~'~.2 ~~ 8 ~
jleoo..,..., ...
.S t'll ~ - ~ S, t.:I .~
liiJ:l."'~<<?IE'"'it
is 'oS .5 ~ 'I:: J:I. g ft
'1: .. .. ...., e ..
.o~.-,~.-aSa
",t)~::I-Q~::Il
li 0. 0 co i lIO'~
:. "'u"OCA
o .2 "t:I ...._ ... G:. "0
u "''''Ell! c
C i .~ 1ii ... ~ ~ ':
,.8 ~;J-5"'... =<2
.. -= "0 .a >..Q
<J.gu::!g~c"o
~"'laeco~lJo-
~ "iO s '" .s.> ~C'l ~o
""'1: -;; .. IS C !:J r--
U:S5.!i=S~Ui~C'
.. .:! GI .. B :: .!! .s (.) ~
...c.S~:a:;~..i ..
~f-cl:O "-OIVA~
t.:I _ 0:: ci > ~ e ~ .S! ,-
en ,.. IS .- E C - ..
-;:; ",..'&ii 0 -! fl g,
-= C&.. _ C'iI :> u.= ~ CI)
.
~.s~~
;;::...<oc...
o GOo
-"1:"110
i'i i.~
~j..'O
.. oSR
lII1101>
El~,!"i
~1i.ga
.. ,,; ..
$I a-'"
'i~:=.!
=1ils.
2- t>-
:-,r:a 1
~ll't;l
i:'J! g'
:as'wl
'!:B.s
if.al ...~
11~j
!!i IS. ~ ..
"i""G.
1~s'~
... .!! d
1!1f!' ._
o'Z'=;s.5
:z: !! ~h: l.
'" u ~ 0.
-a >. ~
11 g ~
.~_i ~ 1; j
f '! ..:: B::I
fi:.. CD l4 'G; ~
~; ic.t]-i
'<6.! ~ 1; '" "'"
fi i ,I. .. 'E j i
S a i~ 0 ::
i i I i ;11 ~
.l.J A' '" .g
i:; 6l 11 ....
i ,t 11 lSi~ ~
~ i ~ ~ -I
J 1l-5' J. B. !:::
~ -:fi..... =- ...
~~ ~& ~ ~1 ~
~ _ I ,S J'! ~
:: ~ f'~ 11 C't....:
..; c.) ,:l:i "l z!
~ .,~.~ ~~~~MC "'9'~ ~
ft !~~I..~~~~~&t ~e.o: !
R .. .0 '2 ., .g.1i . B B !i -= ..; A c.. :.
~ (:! ~'O 8 ~ '" .. 0 m 'f ,!:r - ! ~ 1;> 2
It.... c.. ",fl..-.I:l-g.i oeo
S - A IlO III - ... 0 ~ _ 0. CI .., u I.> _ II
.. 0 G1.5 s:: G" -!l · 0 ....~ A lit Ql) .t:J
~cOO~~e~~u~-s~~ ~ 5 S
>0 ~P'j~~."u -- ~.~ 01
~ 'j 11 - .t:: '0 i3 :go.c 5:a 00 '.. a:; S Ii;
-ol!l ",a g. .......pelli 'Sl3l:l :l
-;'il -:.g -8 ! g. ~ ~ ~ ~ -8 oJ ~ iJ os 'j;
~.~~~~~u-~~l~ .. ~ ~
,s.&....-;...s.,sxrJ3"ll1...8 ~;J~ '8
.. - 0 ~ ... go.s p ~ r; ~ -= '2 .: .s 'g
~; .el" 2 .."OoI:'ilI ~ 0 ij,l: cl .. CI.
'~= 5'O~.i!~~a;!~ .;-s~ j
15e ! '" i s.8 B .. i.li ... .e ~ ~ '!2
.- l:l '" .= >-. Ei ~ ~ - -iiS Iii .5
J! Is g... eo:l"; :2 1! B i Q 31 .'~ j "S
J;f~g~.e5~~~~~~G1.i i
~.~ f: <<l i j i ~ ~ f ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ I!i ;
~.! ~:: c ~ "'E ~ lij 0. 'lii ~ III ~ Q:5 .
ll" e ~ 8 8 ~ :; a -a go.s S ~.~ ~.:; a -;; ~
1 ~ :- a ~ a e- ~ g 10 0; l! .~ 0 ~ R Ii 8. ~ ]
-.... is "'0] e:2 ~ ~ B.g I ~ ,9 ~ . ~ ~ Fe 1;
~.! uQl~.sc .ODMC 10;;0 tJi
ou~..~~...~==-..~~~~8.~~~
2.:;:-e.tloO-:;:.!fI~""'-_1II <R__
~ -= l1 i ~ 2! g e 8'O:s ~. ~ ~ :;
")
.
~ ~:1
'~ -a 'i
~ II::
~'o
;g 'c"
.. ..0 ~
-S .of:
't t:~
!~
II: ..
"02
OJ ~"
::l ..!,:- c:
"':'!I' ~ II
- ~~
~ ~-=
.2 .::t
... PS"
":; ;;..
... ",. ~.
~ ~ ~.~....;
... ~ ~ ~~
CI. Q oS::
e ~ 1; Q.~
~ .!:! AS Fi
_ ~ ~-s.e
.2t..~.s~
!:.~-8""E~
'!!-:,g-:~~
-..,. ~~ I:: ~
.. E So.
.I
...
g
~ '
l!
s'e
!l
I -
.A .a
a
...,.-.
.9~
4'~
!.
..,
c:
os
~
't:
fXl
ld:' a
8'g i
e~ ~
CL, '1:j tllI
8: ~
l::l '"
e:a t
~ e ~
:=o:.l 5
~ ti.... CI)
g....... 0"0) .2
~ "& ~ii='g
o~o.s~.c
~ IO~Oii
~ <-3 ,5 ,.c::; _ ~
~~Ii~e-
J:$ ... a co
fc.,FC~or;!.
.! ~... t'- .6 GO
.:: _....'Ol:IJ""
... NUU U
r4
o
Q
o
...
o
t)
..
:;:')
>.
..0
g :
~'i
VI
lip
f~ cot
i'o !
o b b
i!~ .;
11); I.=!
::~ ~~
_;_: lG\'
~ ...(J~
~:; ga;!,
'j! .. JI. ... :i "ii
~ -! 1: d'1P':
a.ff>o,-g";:
-s...~ !'f. ~
... RU 5 i "ltj
l;-':'lIl
,It~ ~:1i!
..~... eoi~
"li",:rr-":::,
'iws_so
oj! f if .! "'1
'iI ... 'C 'i CJ ...
lit-.. CIl :1-
.!!l!gcll~
t:~:;:fi:;1i~
- li"'U:;;:~
~(j i.
.too
..
..
..
'J:
C
N
...
~
~
~
..
&
~
~
~
...
f
q;
1
~
-;
...
..
..
l;
..
~
~ .;
... l
.. ..
: !
of: :5
:: i
..
~ ~
!:!
: f
.! i
! j
:- i
.. "
~ I
.. ,,;
t ~
.. 0
Ii I
Iii ..
~ 2
-< oj
. 1;
.
t-
.
,.
5
..
o
!
1i
j
ii
~
i
i
.
~
'~
8
)
. 68(11/2664 14:63
4678435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE 6S
4Df C 902 ~'r.(
TABLE 1 'Freeze Th.w ResIstance Propertl
COltlprn"ivli 81""'9lh. G"",".1fOH .... mill, .
Cold WIllr AlI'.n. ""II. ~ S8lUlatlon Coelliolent. max.
e.sl (,,",pe)
A_. Of 5 l-.....Idu-. "'\lMag. Of 5-' Averagl of 5
rick "."" - 8rIck Individl./tl rick
8000 (55.2) 1000 (48.31 11.0 11.0 0.78
ClasS MX 3000 (20.n 2500 (172) 14.0 17.0 no Umh
Cia,s IIlX 3000 (20.n 2500 (17.2) no IimiI no ilniI no IImII
: MjnlMI/Il\ IlIodulul 01 ruplUtl v.lu.. ,hould bl ClDnlldarld by Ihl purcll..... lor u.., of bric:k """.r. 'lIpport o. loading "'IV be s.v.....
Thl ..lurltloo co.lftclenl il !hi mUo of Bblorlllion by 24-11 .ubllllrllan in room l.mD."~ waler 10 Ihll ellt' S.h suDme,sion 1/1 DOling WtIler.
..............
4.1.1.1 Absorption AIIBl'11ative-If the average water ab-
sorption is less than ~ after 24-h submersi'on in room-
temperature water, the requirement for saluration coefficient
shall be waived.
4.1.2 Freezing alld Thawi7'/g 1ht Altel'"ative- The require-
menu for water ab30rptioo (24-1\ cold) aftd saturation coeffi-
cient specified in 4.1.1 shall be lIl'llived provided a sample of
five brick. meoting all other rlJquiremeo~, passes the .freezing
. and thawing tesl as lksoribed in tbe Rating scotian of tho
Freezing and Th.wing procedures of Test Methods C 67 with
no breakage aQd not greater tban Q,S % loss in dry weight of
any individual unit.
NOTJ 6-1bc.sD cycle ftwlin.c Ind thana tc6t is apeciftad only Ii an
akBJ7ladve wben brick do not coaComllo either Tabl$ 1 R<lVimncnlS for
maximum waler absorption and sal\U'lc!olJ c:od6eicm, or 10 th& rcsl\icl{vc
absorplj()tl requirements In 4.1.1.1.
4.J .l.l Slllf4t. SOUn0lfiSt .Telt A/ll!ntarille-The require-
''---'" J'JIe1Its for w.ter absorption (24-11 cold) and 5.tlJration QOCfi)-
cient specified in 4.1.1 shall not be required if a sample of five
brick survives 15 cycles of the sulfate soundness test in
accordance with Sections 4, 5, and 8 of Test Method C 88 with
no visible damage.
Nors 7-The S1I1fate so\md12&ss leSl is an opliolllll subslin.to l\lSt for tile
tie&%inS-&lld,lb1wint Ielt (<1.1 ,2.).
4.1.3 pvj'orllto/'lc' illt~7latlve-If information on the per.
formance of Ihe units in a similar application of similar
eltposurt. and traftic is furnished by the maoufaCtu1'llt' or his
. aBeIlt and is found aoccptabl. by the specifier of the pavement
Dlalorial, or hiS agent, the physical requirements in 4.1.J may
be waived.
. 4.1.4 Mold" Ji'riclc (~.ft Mud, S~i-D", P1U$etl, and Dry
pru:sed Brick)--The requirements listed in Table J shell be
qhanged for molded bric;k to pmnit maximum absorpt101\ of
16.0 % averaae and 18.0 % individual, and minimum compre'"
sivt sttetlgths of 4000 psi (27.6 MPa) average and 3500 psi
(24.1 MPa) individual for Class SX, provilkd that the require.
. menta for sawrabon eoeffic;ient of Table 1 arc met.
NOTE a- The resistance of brick to wcatbainc C8ll1lOt be prcdic;lcd
with ton)pletll assurance al rho present state of knowledge. There is no
~'I\ !/lit Ih.I CIA predicl weamerina ruialll)Cll with complete leCUl1lC~
Bride in gQlcral is superior in woathcring rcsilfangl 10 olher buildin.
rIlItai.b. 1'hcre Ire iM\III1er.blc inll8llCllI ot ,"Ii,ractor)' pod'OTIJIIIICIC
bcylllld 200 )'ClII'I .lId .....D11 inlO tho lhouRnda Dr )'ell'l. NcvonlIc:lc.u
tbere. art SOIlle bJicJc. tliac cannOl surviva I few wiftlCt1 or. severe freezing
and \Illl.\lfirlg CIIvironmenl.
',-" f)lc dur.blliry rc'lUjrcmopli ohhc spcclftcalion alletllpt to fi);c:ltldc auell
btiGk. This .pceillcation utiliZ1l1 Ihe ~I knowled;c IYlIilable III this lime
and i$ b.scd on eXlcnsive research by lCl\l&l'allnvll5tiprors. Thll durabilily
requircmen15 h"'c all excellent eorrclalioll with in'lI" pertonnlncc.
Individual
0.80
noUmII
no 11m.
NevenJlelel<.i, it is kJ\oW1) that lomo bride that meel this specifiellion may
!lot be SlZrviceable ill scvere climltes. Furlhcrmore. other brid: Ihal do not
mcot lhele specifications mey show SUperiOl S4l"11iceability in till molt
IOVcrc c1imale. The best indication of brick dorabilily i. ill service
expcrilll<< record.
4.2 Unless otherwise speci6ed by the purchaser, brick of
Classes SX and MX shall be acc::epte4 instead of Class NX arid
. '
Class SX shall be accepted lJ\$tead of Class MX. 1'ype I and
~e n shan be accepted instead of:rypc m, and l)'pe I shall
bo aw~led instead of Type n.. .
4.3 Ab,.asio/'l.,Rfllitfllllce-The brick shall meet the require-
menu of tither column (1) or (2) ofTable 2 for the applie~le
trame; UK (sec: 3.1.2).4
Nora 9-Skidlllip rcsiSlanee should b6 considllfed by tile purcha$u for
vcoc of~i~:..,1lete peckstri8ll \fatlic is aI1tieipllled. Mc1bods oftcscinglllis
~C\CINt)C arc under SI1Idy I(Id it is lIoplld mil I specification for Ihls
propcl1y CUI be Iddcd ill fulurc revisions of this Sllllldard when suicable
ll:$ll1lCthods are developed.
S. Emorcsctnc8
S.l Brick are not (equired to be tested for efflorescence to
c~pl)' wil.h this speciJication un.Jess requeslcd by the specifier
or purc;buer. WheD the dflorc3eence test is requested by lbe
llpceificr or purchaser. the brick sbAlI be sampled at the place of
rnanUracl\lre, and tested ;n accofdance Wilh Test Methods C 67
and a rating for efflorescence shall be "not effloresced." tfth~
ratixts for dfloresceoce i$ "ellloresced," the brick represented
by the t8Slmg do not meet the cfflorcs(;GDC:c requirements of
tltis specifiee.tion. .
6. $I,:e
6.1 The size of tbe brick shall be as speoified by the
purehtftt' or produced by the manufacturer as a stock item.
6.2 Tho tolerances on dimension and w/ltpage Shall depend
on the lIpplication speciMd. Wben the application is not
specified, the requirements for Application PS shaJJ govem.
6.2.1 A.pplication PS-;Pavil1g brick intendecl for general
use and in$talled with. mortar joint between individual units,
or in an in"t.Jlalion witbout mortar joints betweCA unii.s when
they are laid in runnina or olher bonds not reilUlrins ~rremely
close dimerl$ioqal tolerances.
6.2.2 Applicttl;On PX-Pavms brick inlended for installa.
. tion WiUl0UI monar jointS between the units, where exception.
ally elo.. dimen&ionel tolerances arc required u . result. of
special bOl\(I patterns or \lnusual construCl161'l requirements.
. MoBllrney. J. W.. I3tio.... It. M.. Eberle. ^. P... "/l.el.lion Dr \IItlOr ^"sorplion
and SIrOD8l" or Brick 10 Ablilivc RtliIIGdt;e."l'rlIC"tHnlS. ASTM. VOl 40. 1940.
PII. 1143-llSt.
2
.
.
68/11/2664 14:63
.
467S435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE 6'3
- /
.oC902
'--""
TABLE 2 AbrasIon ResIstance Property ReqUlrementsA
(2)
(1) Vo\ulml AbreslOn LOaI, C
Abr8siOIl1nde,... IlIIll miX. cm3tc".1
Typ~ 1 0.11 1.7
Type 1\ 0.25 U
Typl III 0.50 4.0
" Slt.clllle 18IllJlIIllCCOId"lnlIIO me Slmplll\g procmrc 01 TMI Mllhod5 C 87.
Thl bril;- "'ah meell...e requirements of ellller column (1) or (ll). The VlIIuIlS lI$Iecl
then not be axcelded by Iny indj,lJduII unII ;IIIIhin Iht SImple.
I Thl abtaslon Index III c.1wl,tecl from 1111 CQId IbeotoliOn In percenl .nd \hI
cOP>P,esstVll ....8IIIJIII In DOI/n(lt pe, squ_ Inellll fOllows:
100 x IIbJOrPlIon
AbrasIon Ind8lt . cornprellIV,slten!J\ll (1)
eornpresslve Itrlngth vlh,"s .re lnf\.Jenced by Ill8citnen s11lpe (penlcu18tlv Ihe
MiuM 10 wIlIlII reUo of 11.1 thl sptclmen). Ther.fore. I JIltpell tpBCifted ~
COf'torms to the 4"8 On ~ 1111 &bralion indmt 1& I18Hd.' .
TIle comprenivl ....ng\" S1I811 III lle\emlinld Otllpeclmenl mRliurll>g 3"'" by
314 by .2'" In. ;I: ~ in. (gaby Bfl by 57 film :: !I mm) for Iengtl1. wlIlIII, Iltld helvhl
,..apllClive~ The btiCk shaG b. wh\IQul cora IlOl11. other plrfOtaliona or /roo..
Olher ""pell Ipldm_ me)' be \I.-ad provIdld .,.. lI\e producer s\lblllilt
M'tden'l IICcep18b11 to dw pu<eh.....Illa1 ... change h sllllpe gW8I ~1efII
.,..nglh 'elulllto t1lOK or lIIe apeclfttld sltap"
The 8bre.lon millln>C11 SllOUld be d81lr/lllnlClaccanllnglO CoIuIlItl 2 In 111-
cel.. ""'ere lIIe procedural t9q\1iratt1enh tor compranive alt6ftOlh ctnnol bl.......
C ThI"otume abt8llonlosl "'.. be dalenntMlt ill .COClIdence WIIh T.......etIlocI
C '111, with !hi fo/IOMng chtflgel In procedure:
(f) The s..... shell ba I _I tlIica slblG flam on....,. lL, graded 10 pa" I No.
50 (300-..m) llave end rtlilllMG 011 a No. 100 (150.1lI1I) s;e....
(t) TIle ....1.. be tUn on dry l/tICIl.
(31 me durltlon vi !hi t.-t silt. be 2 min.
(4' me nt8 of $8IId low ~ ba 600 g/lnin.
15) The VaNme lOSS shill be cMlenriflo:d bY tlIlIng lIIe ebred.d depresSion "'""
modllOnll CitY. strlkl~ olf '-I with .... 0/191/111 ""'ace vi.... britk. and rlllllD\llni
end weigh\t19 \he modlllng clav. TM vohl/l\e 101. ah" b. calcvlalU IIOll1 lha bulk
dehSiIy of lIta tnOCIeIin!I dIPY. The bulk dlnsl, shpl be delBrmln8d on each 101 ot
~Il cll1.
An alternative /llelllllCl or lIel8l1ll1nlng III. weight of "BY und In IiliI1!l \he s,"if.
blBSI cavil\' IS to 1IelBnnl11l h welgl1t grltle mod81n9 ellY S;prlDle befOre and Ifter
IUIin9 ~ ClIV~.
TABLE 4 Toleran~1 on DImension.
Maximum Perml&slDle Varlation 'rom
SpllCif.ed OImentlon. plus or tlIinul
1II.lmml
"ppllelllOl' AppllCltlon
p>< PA
\116 (1.lI)
~ (2A)
'It (3.2)
~(5,6)
OlmInslon. in. (tTIII)
3 (7&) and ,,"d,'
Over 3 ID 5 178 10 127)'Nj
OU1ll5 ID 6 (127 to 203) IncI
Ov" 8 (203)
AppiC8llon
PS
.,. .13.2)
y.. (4.7)
l4 (1l.1)
VIa a.')
no'miI
no limit
no Rmir
noUml1
',-,
TABLE 3 Tolerane.. on ~i&tortion
PIltlNUibIe OiIIOttIon. malt
In. fmml
AgpliCalion PX AllolioaliOll PS
1M '1.6) -Ma (2.4)
~ (:U) 14 (U)
14 (3.21 ~ (4.0)
spec\t1td Dimanaioo
In. (mm)
8 (203) _ under
Over 8 ~) to 12 (80S)
OV8f' 12 ~ 10 16 (406)
6.2.3 APplicQtion PA-Pavjng brick manufa.ctured and se-
lected to produce ebaracteristit: arc;hitet:tutal effects resulting
frQm nonuoifonnity in size, color, and textunl of individual
units. (The textures may exhibit inclusion of nonuniform
nodules of mineral substapolls or purposely i~trod\lced cracks
that enhance the appearance of the units.) The. requirements on
warpage and dimetl8ioDBI tolerances as specified in 6.3 and 6.4
do not apply 10 this application.
'-....
6.3 Dimellsiollal Tolertvlce-Brick shal) not depart from the
specified size by more than the individual tolerance for the
application specified as proscribed in Table 4.
6.4 Wn"page-The concave and conv&jt warpage (distor-
tion) of any face intended to be dle exP!lsed surface or edge of
the pavlnll shall not exceed the values of Table 3 when sampled
and me&sllred'in aCCOt'd.~ce with Test Methods C 67.
7. VisuaJ Inspectl!!n
1.1 The brick shall be free of cracks or otber imperfections
detracting &om die appearance of I. designated sample wbed
vjewed 1\-.,m adistaDCf: of IS ft (4.610) for Application PX and
. D. distanc", of 20 ft (6 en) for Appllcatlon l'S:
7.2 The parts ofEbe brick that w;U be exposed in place shan
bla free of chips that exceed the limits given In Table S.
7.3 Unless otherwile agreed upon by the purchaser ond the
llCller, II ~livery ofbrick shall contain not more thaD S % bric:k
lhtt do tlot meet tt\8 combined rBq1Jirements of Tables +5,
(nc1udin, broken brick.
7.4 Aller bdck ate placed in usage the 1l\anUfaClUrer or the
manufacturer's alent shall not be held tesponsible for eontpli-
ance of brick lIIIitb tbe requiremenrs of Ibis specification for
chlppage and.. dimensional tolerances,
8. Sampling' and Testmg
8.1 The brick shall be sampled atld tested In accordance
with Test Methods C 61.
Nolt lo-tJnlm othecWirc JgeCilie.d ie the purcb8st OJcler. the eo!! DC
!be '.1Ii i. r.ypicaU, borne 1$ foll_: If \be r_llS of lI\lllllSlI show lbat
tbe brick do poI confOJl'Jl to the roquircmetll.S of Ibis specificarlon, \be cost
is cypictJly born by 1M seJll!l(. 11' IN l'CS\l)tI of 111& tests .ow that tilt. brlcJc
do confonn to IbIl f&qUiranc:nl.S of 111&. 'PccJtication. the cost is typically
bome by the pvtdtaHf.
,. KeywordS
9.1 brick; fired masonry unit; light traffic; paving; pedes.
trian traffic
08/11/2004 14:03
41378435753
CORPORATE OFFICE
PAGE 10
.
<<<mIf C 902
'-'".
TABLE 5 Mllxlmum Pl!f1lIls&lble Extent of Chlppage from Edge.
and Corners
NOTa-The aggregalelength of chips on a sil'lllhl unit shall not exceed
1 0 ~ of the perimerer of llle CllpOlcd race of rhc ~cJc.
--S!l!Ree. In Inen!!..lM"IIIMl/'88\ In tram
Edg. _ SCl.'lIer
~. (7.ll lh (12.71
y., (6.4) ~ (9.5)
a. speclned b)' plll'o....ser
Ar>~1ion
PS
PX
PA
SUMMAltY OF CHANGES .
Committee CI S haG idenlified the locatio!) of selected changes to this ,taodard since the last issue (C 902-0 I a)
that may impact the use of this 8tandard.
(I) Paragiapbs 6.2 through 6.3 were rev;$e(l to chl.rit)' tbe inle11t
or tbe tolerance requirements.
.
ASTM InI8rnl"iornlI r."., no po,iIion ,upecllnglh. VIIIidIIy oI.ny piI,"m righlf. aft""" In CQMIICIJOn wrlh any,;l.,., mlln/i9nlld
in h,ii t,pf'dIId. U..,. 011";' ,Ilnlhrd ,,. flNp'."" Rmfllllhll dfllll""if/i/IiDrl 01 Ih. ."tidily of eny lUg. pplenl rig"ts. Pf'd U." ,ip
()/ in"ing......., of tuCh rig"'" ." ""U,tIy /hili, own '.,pOfIlibili/y,
Thi$ "anlW'd is ,"bjeCI '0 r,1IiSiOn .' IUIJ'lim. by ,/Ie fWPoneiol. I,Chnirn/ Cl1I7lf7'it,.II IInd ,.,,,'" DfI r.vi_ed ....,., five '.~'f and
1/ not I&.'lsel1. .,tha, ,..pprOV8l1 orwlUttl'8WIl. You, COlli,"",,, .,. iMU.tlltillle, tor ,eflis;ort 01 /hit '!PIt/.rtI Of lor IIl1tJilitJMI "lInl1ntl1r
8IId sIIOUld bfl 1ItItI'8Ued to ASTM Inlfltfllllfonal HII/It1qu/1nl!tt. Your cofflml/lll. wiV ffir:ew 1:6,.(111 COtIIIII1er.,1on III B lTIIIaI/flg 01 Ute
IS'ptlIIlibl. lecMicrIt comllllu... whic/l )IOu T71111 Bl/ellt1. "YOU 'lIet ,''',, your COIfltll8nl, hBv. not IIclI/lIeI1 , fslr l1eltfing you 5110uld
...,k.. JIll" """" knoWn to Ill.. AS'fllA CI;Im",i,/." Oil Sli/tld""'.. ill ,,,. ilddrelfS BI1f1Wf' bfllow.
'---'
ThiI sl'lldart! is copy,ighled by ASTM InlemS/loIlSl. 100 8.". Hllfbor Otllle. PO BfJJt C70D. Well COI'IS/loIlDCkI/ll. PA 1942tJ.2959.
IJrrjflld SI.,lfS. IndM~/ reprinlS (lif1l1/1f D' mullip/" coptllS) of IMs IIIBnt/8m ms.. bfI obIeiMa by confilcrif1l1 ASTM ., Ih, lIbov.
"ddres$ Of III 610-B32-9"5 (p"on.). 610.B3l.9555 ('PIC). Of Sfltvice@allm.org (If-mi';I); or /I1ro",g" ,'''' ),S'i'M Wfll1sil.
~nSfrn. 0Ip}.
.
.'--'/
'.
,
4
..
.
Permeable Pavement Systems in Shoreland Areas,
A Guidance to Local Governmental Units
DNR Waters, St. Paul, Minnesota
September 10, 2003
Background
The impact of impervious surfaces upon public waters has always been a concern of the
statewide Shoreland Management Program. When the statewide standards were revised
in 1989, the established limit of30% impervious for shoreland lots was reduced to 25%.
The reason behind this reduction was explained in the Statement and Need of
Reasonableness (SONAR) for the rules. The SONAR noted that most development
rarely exceeds 30% and that 25% was still a "large percentage." "This is needed to
prevent the excessive amount of runoff that will be generated during a rainstorm by an
enlarged impervious area. Such excessive runoff will cause erosion and transport of
. pollutants to public waters thereby degrading water quality."
Since then, much more has been learned about the impacts of impervious cover on
aquatic systems. In March, 2003, the Center for Watershed Protection issued a report
that summarized the results of225 studies involving the use of26 different stream
indicators. These verified earlier studies that showed that the effects of increasing
impervious cover on a healthy stream begin to be seen when the impervious cover
exceeds 10%. Indicators show stressed conditions for streams having impervious
watershed cover between 10 and 25%. Beyond 25%, severe degradation takes place.
.
The report cautioned that these data have not yet been validated for non-stream
conditions. However, some of the referenced studies involved lakes and drinking water
reservoirs. These noted that phosphorus export to a water body increases steadily as the
percent of impervious cover increases. Aggressive watershed protection strategies were
recommended for reservoirs having 10 - 25 % impervious cover. Data indicate that
reservoirs having over 25% impervious cover cannot sustain safe drinking water supplies.
While the indicators are useful in estimating trends and cumulative impacts, the report
cautioned that they should not be used empirically. In general, the rule of thumb applies:
the greater the percent of impervious surface, the greater the impact to water quality and
natural systems. Other parameters like percent of forest cover or natural vegetation
appear to become more important when the percentage of impervious cover is low.
When it is high, the impacts from stormwater over-ride other factors. The report suggests
that non-native vegetation like turf can be included with impervious surfaces when
analyzing impacts to urban streams. Stormwater ponds, while effective at removing
pollutants, were observed to have little effect in improving stream biodiversity. In fact,
the study cautioned that no community has yet demonstrated that it can achieve water
quality standards in an urban watershed that exceeds 25% impervious cover. "Managers
should be extremely cautious in setting high expectations for how much watershed
treatment can mitigate impervious cover. .. Both watershed research techniques and
practice implementations need to be greatly improved (Tom Schueler. 2003. Impacts of
Impervious Cover on Aquatic Systems. Center for Watershed Protection. p.21)."
Exhibit M
DNR GUIDANCE PAPER
..
.
Workshop on Porous Pavement Surfacing Systems, November, 2002
DNR Waters field staff involved with shoreland management met on May 16, 2002, with
Peder Otterson, Shoreland Hydrologist, and Jay Michels, Minnesota Erosion Control
Association (MECA), to discuss the use of permeable pavement systems in shoreland
management. Various concerns were discussed and recommendations made. One
recommendation was that MECA sponsor a workshop of skilled researchers who could
address the questions being raised by field staff and local governmental units. The
workshop took place November 22, 2002, as described below.
.
Bruce Ferguson, an authority on stormwater management from the University of Georgia,
noted that roads and parking surfaces cover approximately twice the area oftheir
associated buildings and represent a good 50% of a built up urban area. For this reason
alone, it is important that everyone involved in land development take seriously the
emerging technologies of porous pavement systems. However, it must always begin with
proper site analysis and matching the right system in the right place. He noted that
porous pavement should not be used over drainfields, on steep slopes or near basements
or water-supply wells. The thickness of the subbase largely determines the surface's
load-bearing capability. The thickness can also be used to increase storage of infiltrating
stormwater where underlying soils have limited percolation. For safety, some construct
the subbase to the frost depth. However, Ferguson noted that for practical protection 0.5
frost depth should suffice since the open voids allow for some expansion during
freeze/thaw and the system is, to a degree, self-insulating.
.
William James provided details of the studies he has made using cement pavers in the
laboratory and field at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. His studies show the
positive effects such pavers can have over impervious pavement in reducing the impacts
of temperature, pH and turbidity of the stormwater runoff. He found little problem with
frost heave or ground water contamination. The subbase acts to retard and break down
pollutants in much the same way as natural soils. Clogging with fine material seemed
limited to just the upper surface of the spaces between the pavers. Use of a power
washer to clean clogged surfaces proved superior to brush/vacuum which just skimmed
the surface and did not remove the clogged layer.
Both presenters stressed that surface drainage should be sloped away from the porous
pavement areas to reduce the amount of clogging. This led to a number of questions
concerning street sanding, routine maintenance, stormwater retention during early spring,
etc. Both presenters stressed that with a properly designed and installed permeable
pavement system, it should not be necessary to sand or salt the roadway since meltwater
is absorbed into the pavement. A member of the audience noted that he had seen proof of
this in local installations where there was observable retention of stormwater and
resultant dry surface conditions during winter months. Ferguson indicated that the time is
. coming when porous concrete itself may provide a relatively low cost alternative to
standard paved surfaces once the issue of freeze/thaw has been resolved.
2
.
.
Recommendations on the Use of Permeable Pavement Systems
in Shoreland Areas
.
Often, the term "porous" and "permeable" are used interchangeably. Technically,
porosity refers to the amount of connected open spaces a material has while permeability
is a measurement of the rate at which water is able to pass through it. The surface of a
paving stone is often impermeable while the large pore spaces between stones allow for
water to flow through. The pavement surface may have high porosity (lots of pores or
holes), but the system may still be relatively impermeable if the subbase is not properly
designed and constructed. Rather than focusing on either the surface of the material or
the subbase, it is better to consider the full design and function of the entire system.
Finally, although a permeable pavement system can indeed be designed and installed to
meet any given stormwater requirement, the system itself can never replace the many
benefits that native soils and vegetation provide in shoreland areas: such things like
habitat, nutrient uptake, soil and pollutant retention, vegetative screening, and aesthetics.
DNR Waters recommends that local governments include in their zoning ordinances a
definition for impervious surfaces. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's new
stormwater management rules define "impervious surface" to be:
"Impervious surface" means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of
water into the soil and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased
rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways,
parking lots, storage areas, and concrete, asphalt or gravel roads."
A similar definition can be found in the Blue Earth County, MN, Shoreland Ordinance:
.
Impervious Surface. The surface area of a lot which has been physically altered in a manner
which impacts the ability of the lot to percolate water into the ground, causing runoff. Impervious
surfaces include rooftops of buildings, blacktopped or concrete driveways and patios, and areas of
landscaping underlain with plastic or other impermeable liners.
If taken as part of the overall site design and used as part ofa larger stormwater
management plan, permeable pavement systems can compensate for some of the impacts
that other impervious surfaces have on a lot. However, they do not take the place of
native vegetation and undisturbed soils, especially, in the Shore Impact Zone, that area
which is closest to the shore and extends to half the setback of the structures.
DNR Waters recommends the following as a reasonable approach for local governments
to follow on the use of emergent technologies like permeable pavement systems in
shoreland areas until such time as greater research, experience and testing can answer the
questions raised. Based on the information provided by the Center for Water Protection
referenced earlier, it appears that such use may be more beneficial when applied to areas
of new development and as part of an integrated stormwater management plan, related
stormwater management ordinance or NPDES, Phase n permit. On degraded sites where
25% impervious is already exceeded, the retrofitting of permeable pavement systems may
be of lesser value. Exercise caution in using infiltration techniques in areas of ground
water sensitivity like wellhead protection zones or sites of known surface contaminants.
3
.
.
.
1. Areas of New Development Strict adherence to shoreland standards. Where
possible, encourage limiting percent of impervious cover to below 10%. No
credit for permeable pavement systems unless included in a comprehensive
stormwater management plan that emphasizes infiltration and onsite retention
of stormwater through a combination of methods including buffer strips,
swales, rainwater gardens and other low impact development methods. This
assumes LGU oversight of design, construction and future maintenance.
2. Areas of Redevelopment. Where existing percent impervious varies between
10 and 25%, LGUs are encouraged to adopt comprehensive stormwater
management controls as described above, giving credit for those that help to
reduce percent impervious. LGUs should strive to limit overall percent
impervious to under 25%, as required in shoreland management rules. For
lots exceeding 25%, redevelopment must reduce impervious surfaces to 25%
or less. Otherwise, a variance is required.
.
3. Redevelopment or enlargement of nonconforming structures on lots
exceeding 25% impervious. Under Minnesota Statutes, the required
variance is to be acted upon by the local Board of Adjustment according to
standards established in statute, rule and local ordinance. Should the Board
decide to grant a variance involving the use of permeable pavement systems,
DNR recommends consideration ofthe following conditions to the variance:
.
a. No permeable pavement system in Bluff Impact Zone or Shore Impact
Zone (area to be maintained or restored to natural vegetative buffer);
b. Where native vegetation is lacking in the above zones, additional
vegetation may be required in order to enhance buffer and screening.
c. The base of the installed system (subbase) must be above the
established ground water table (DNR recommends three feet of
separation similar to onsite sewage treatment systems to ensure soil
absorption and enhanced retention of stormwater);
d. System to be designed and certified by a registered engineer or
landscape. architect and installed by someone qualified in the particular
system used;
e. System should be set back from structures having basements, septic
system leach fields, steep slopes and wells;
f. The design should allow for the infiltration of the first inch of any
storm. If stormwater retention is a goal, DNR recommends that the
design meet the two year 24 hour storm (approximately 2.5 inches);
g. The site should be inspected during construction for compliance.
h. The designer must include maintenance instructions to the property
owner along with a maintenance schedule with copy to the Zoning
Administrator or Building Inspector to be filed along with the permit.
1. When possible, the system should be designed so that it can be
periodically monitored to ensure it continues to work as planned.
J. System must be compatible with local stormwater management plans,
ordinances, and NPDES Phase II stormwater permits, where required.
4
-'
Appendix
Porous Pavement Surfacing Systems: Will they Work in Northern Climates?
(Notes and Comments from the November 22, 2002, Workshop)
Presentations by the Two Principle Speakers:
Bruce Ferguson, University of Georgia: A Global Perspective on Porous
Pavements. "Porous pavement is perhaps the greatest invention since the automobile!"
Why, because roads and parking spaces cover roughly twice the area of their associated
buildings and represent a good 50% of the built up area. They affect downstream water
quality and temperature and even the health of urban trees.
.
Porous pavement has the potential to restore urban watersheds. Despite the many
misgivings (water weakens pavement, won't work in northern climes, etc.), the topic is
too important to simply discredit. Ferguson has examined over 300 systems in North
America and concluded there is not a simple "yes" or "no" to the question.
Porous pavement got off to a bad start around 1970 when EP A began pushing porous
asphalt on R&D projects. This was a big flop since asphalt is by its nature self-clogging.
Porous concrete works much better-especially, if it is made of single size aggregate
(creates a medium with roughly 20% voids). This could easily be used for off-highway
use and should cost about the same as regular concrete. Like a forest soil, it has its own
storage capacity and retention and develops its own micro-ecosystem (moist, aerated
bacteria) that has been shown capable of biodegrading oil products through a 12 inch
layer. The problem lies in repeated freeze/thaw cycles that can reduce the pavement to
powder over time. Ferguson believes this can be resolved within the next two years.
.
Some basic maintenance principles are to avoid sanding, but use angular, graded
aggregate and keep drainage from soil off the pavement (as it can introduce fines). For
strength, a minimum base course of six inches is required.
Corps of Engineers has developed nationwide curves on frost depth, etc., based on the
number of freezing days at a site-e.g. a 10 year frost depth based on 2500 freezing days
is 80 inches. For complete protection, one should build the sub-grade to the frost depth.
However, for practical protection, 0.5 frost depth is generally used. Open voids allow
some expansion during freezing and the ponded water within the system is, to a degree,
self-insulating. Use graded material to avoid differential heaving (frost boils).
End result of using porous systems is cleaner water, longer lived trees, cooling
(evapotranspiration), quieter streets, safer driving, beauty, reduced costs, and
conformance to development regulations for stormwater management. It should be
designed to drain away from the edges in all directions. It should not be used over drain
fields, where there are leachable toxins, on steep slopes, near basements (20 feet) or
water-supply wells.
.
Some myths are that they don't work over clay, require compacted sub grades, won't
work in freezing climes, get clogged and fail quickly, are costly and "there is no
experience of using them in our area." All of these myths can be debunked through
proper design, construction and attention to site specific conditions. As familiarity and
confidence with their use increases, the cost should also come down. Costs also come
down when one includes the pavement as part ofthe entire drainage system (i.e. in place
of some of the pipe and pondage that otherwise might be required).
Q/A: How long can such a system be expected to work without clogging? Generally, the
greatest decline is in the first S - 8 years and can be avoided by designing it right in the
first place to control sedimentation and clogging ofthe subgrade.
.
What about plowing and sanding? By using a roller on the plow or setting the blade one
inch above the surface, there should be no problem. "And don't you dare sand!"
(It shouldn't be necessary to sand if designed properly.)
What about spring snow melt? Don't you still need to design ponding for 100 yr event if
part of an integrated design? Not completely. Jay Riggs noted that even in winter there
is quite a bit of infiltration over porous pavement he has seen.
Construction sequencing?~i.e. the problem of building roads first and then clogging
them up with a lot of sediment. Do the roads last or at least the final treatment.
.
William James, University of Guelph: Design and Testing of Interlocking Concrete
Block Pavement. Porous pavement is good at reducing three main concerns from runoff:
temperature, pH and turbidity. Traditional pond design is costly (earth moving), has a
high maintenance cost, is aesthetically challenging and potentially dangerous. Porous
pavement can provide flood control without ponds, water quality and temperature
control, and help preserve aquatic ecology. Thermal pollution or "thermal enrichment" is
directly proportional to a site's % impervious. Ecostone has approx. 12% voids and
should not be put next to basements. It helps to aerate the underlying soil. Clogging
occurs only in the top crust. Sand is itself dispersed by traffic in the driving lanes and has
not been a problem at his test sites. Curbs are bad (just a guide for plows) and should not
be used. Geotextiles provide a good substrate for microbes. The rough surfaces of the
stone reduce ice problems. Pea gravel about ~ inch in diameter is good for the fill and
substrate. Fine particles do penetrate, but are ultimately snagged. Vegetation in the cells
is not a problem and helps to keep fines out. A power washer is better than a
brush/vacuum for cleaning cells (brush just skimmed the crust). Frost heave has not been
a problem. Nor has ground water contamination (filtered by substrate). Stormwater
Management Model (SWMM) provides design overkill for questions of water quality and
quantity. One can install 800 square feetlhour by hand; 1200 square feet, mechanical.
2
,.
. ,
:)
0..
o
.:l
rIJ
.::&':
Jo.
o
~
~
.:l
...
~
~
~
1:1
~
t:
=
o
.:l
~
t::
=
...
r/.)
~
Z
Q
>.
.Cl
rIJ
...
1:1
~
e
e
o
u
ui ~
(l)
"5 ~
e (l) ~
e~]oo
8oo(l)"E
r:: ~ ~ S
~]oe
.~ 1a i 8
"0 -:S';> (l)
(l)'d(l)-:S
"0 (l) I-< to-<
';> ..... 0 0
00.....00
l-< r::.s:: (l)
p..rno.......
r:: ~ ;:I p..
(l) -:S e ~
&; 0 (l) 00
G) ..: ~ (l)
. ft (l) .s:: .~
p..&;I-<1a
]~~$:l
rn 0 (l) (l)
~::r:::::~
o . ... I-<
~ . ~ fr
(l) ~ (l) I-<
-:S . c:> ~ (l)
'.p >. e
"0 p......... 0
(l) (l) (l) 00
]~~(l)
(l)rn.......~
....."0.....
1a (l) 0 (l)
~rnr::~
~ ~.~ ::r:
t;j ~."';:::
rn >< ft 0
I-< (l) (l) I-<
(l) rn rn (l)
~.....;:I.s::
~.gSS
~s~t@
1""\ p.. (l) (l)
I-4rnbOp..
r:: e ~ 0
(l) >. ::l "0
J:!fa8~
~::S5-:s
~
:... -
~ ~
<-:I .....
~~
_..s:
~ 0() --
<-:I ~ U
b()..... ~
~ ~ ~
.~~.....
~~....
!:::l...c ~
~.... ~
;::.. ~ .<-:1
'.t:: ~ ;:;:
~~~
:... ':S ~
~
....~.....
~..... ~ .....
"tS....~~
~b1~8
<:).:.; ~~
~':Sh~
- :... ~.....
~~~<-:I
':S~~~
~~~~
- ........... ~
~:..."tS<:)
~ ~ ~ .,
""J <-:I <-:I '"
~ "tS -~-
!:::l. ~ i2 ~
<-:I ~ ~ C)
~~:~~
~~t3u
b() ;::...... ~
~........~
..... '" ~ I';;:
':S :... ~ .....
<:)~<-:I~
~ ~ :... ~
-~..s:
......i!':S<-:I
8'.t:: <:) ~
'.t:: ~ "tS ':S
~ ~ ~.:.;
~~'tl.o
:::::..c~~
..... ~ <-:I.....
1;;.~~u
~ ..... ~
_~ <-:I ~ ~
.......~~~
~
~
~
~
.....
-
~
!:::l.
..s: .
u ~
~ ~
~':S
~ ~
~ ;::..
<-:I <:)
-- :...
~ ~
~ .....
"tS
.o~
..c ~
.g~
<:) ~
:... ~
!:::l.....
~ ~
~ ~
~- .2
.9 ~
- .....
..!::! .~
.... ~
~i!
<-:I :...
.:.; <:)
~ ~
~ C)
~ ~
\U~
~~
:.;, ;::..
~ ~
<:)..s:
~;;:
~ ~
~ ~-
~ :....
<-:IS
<-:I &
~ :...
s~
~
<:) ~
~~
r~, "tS ~
~~~
U .~
.:.; ~ ~
~ E ~
~ !:::l...s:
':S~~
~6 ~
- .....
1;; ~ - .
<:):...~~
~ ~.:t:: ~
. ~<s.~
~ :... .:.; :...
~i!~~
:...~u':S
~ :... ~ :...
~ ~ ~ <:)
:>. ~..s: _
,:;.. I';;: ~ .....
~ ~ ~ ~
U - _ <:)
..ss~~~
:;:> ~ ':S <:)
~ ~ t-:l -
<-:Ih~.Q
~ ~ ~'u
.;:;;-. ""J l::S
~~~~
~~~u
~ :... <:) ~
~ <:) ~ ~
~.[ E ~
~ r" !:::l..<-:I
:........- ....
~ ...::: ~
- ~ ~ :...
~ ..... <:)-~
..s:-..s:1::;
-~<-:I"tS
~.:t:: ~ ~
I';;:<s.~~
~.:.; . <:)
:... - <-:I
1;;~~..9
- ..... ~ ....
~ C) r-, <:)
<:) ~ 6"-
h~....~
:... ~ ~ <-:I
<:) ..... ;::.. ~
~~~~
.
~
..c
~
~
<:)
..s:
<-:I
~
~
~
......
.....
~
~
~
..s:
~
~
....
~
.~
"tS ~
~
l::S ~
..s: ~
~t3
~ ~
g ~
...... .....
~~
:... :...
:... <:)
~..s:
;::.. <-:I
~ ~
~':S
;;: .5
~ ?7.
~:::::
~ ~
~ 'u
~ ~
6 ~
!:::l.~
<-:I "tS -
~ ~
E .~
<:) ~
Q..,.::::
.9 ~
- <:)
~ ~
~ ~
<-:I ~
.:.; '.t::
- U
~~
'r;; ~
~ .:.;
e.;"tS
~ C)
.9 ~
-
~ .~
~ ~
<:) ~
U..s:
~-
-
'r;; ~
~ ~
C)..s:
.2 ~
~ ~
<:) ~
'.t:: ~
~ ~
:::::....
~ ~
~ ~
<-:I -
<:) ~
~ ~
~ ~
.~ c ~
~ ~ ~
~.<-:I ~
:... .: ~
~""""tS
~ . ~
<:) ~ ~
~ ~ .~
<-:I ~ l::S
~ ~....-
~ ~ '0
"l ..... <-:I
~ ~ -
~ ~
"ti"tS~
,.~ ~....
-.. ~ !:::l.
-
l::S
':S
~
~
<-:I
~
~
.2
"tS
~
~
~
~
~
~
.....
-
~"ti
':S ~
..lC.2
U .....
..!::! ~
<:)
~~
-"tS
<-:I ~
.... l::S
8"tS
<:) ~
.... ....
-....
<-:I ~
<:) <-:I
~ .5
iii' -
<-:I"tS
..... ~
1:: !l::
~ .!?p
~~
~~
~.o
- :...
~ ~
;:. ~
l::S :...
..s:!:::l.
~~
':S ~
~E
~ ~
~-
;::.. ~
tt:l <-:I
.~ ~
~ :...
':Si!
~ ~
..... ~
~ ~
.9~
-
~~
~~
~ 2:
;::.. ~
"tS U
~ .....
~~
~':S
'0 ~
<-:I ~ ~
.... \U ....
~..s: :...
~-i!
~ ~ U
~ ~ g
bo <-:I
]~~
U - ~
.~ :...- U
..... ~ <-:I
~~..e..
~ ~ ~
,,~..s:
~ U <:)
~ <R"'"
l::S :... b()
~ ~ .5
8~':S
~ <:) <:)
:... - ~
l::S ~ ~
<-:I~~
~ - ;::..
~ ~ E
~h !:::l.
<-:I"tS"tS
..s: ~ ~
U l::S ~
~ ~ ~
<-:I C) ~
~ -.r;: ;.::
~ ~ ~
~ ~ <:)
tt:l~~
.
..lC - "tS
:... ~ ~
<:).... l::S
~ i:: ~
~"tS ~ <:) ~
..s:~l::S~'.t::
- ~ ~
~~~.2~
C) :... ~ - --
..s:<:)..............
..s: ~ ~ .~
:; <-:I ~ ..... ~
<:):... ~
..c ~ ~ l::);.9-
~]~~h
~~~~~
~..c ~....~=
~ ~~5..c ~
8 ~ "tS ..s: .... .~
:...~<-:I~c
~~~~i!!:::l.
<:) <-:I ~ ~ ~ ~
<-:Il::S':S~~~
<-:I"tS~.g~l::j
~~.~~~s
~ ~ 6...!::! ~ ~
~ :... ~ ~ ~ .....
r;:;'- :...~..s::
<-- ~.... - ~
~..c.... ~,,~ ~
" ..t::~-~
-ti .2 <-:I .9 .Q <-:I
~~~.~:...~
.~ :... ~ ~ ~ ~
..::c~<:)~~ti
~~~~E~
\U ~ \U ~ !:::l. "tS-
':S..s::'" .~ <:)
~-i!c.i~<-:I
bo~~ ~':S~
l::j ~ <:) <:)
:.;, .......t::~-
~ ~ ~ ..... <:) ....
<:)c""'''tS ~
U<-:I~~~~
~~~C)-~<-:I
~ ~ I';;: U ~
~ 'to' .....
<:) ..... , b() "ft _
-"""~~"Q-
"tS ~ ~'t: .5 .9
~~ <:)..s:-
~..... _ _ _l::S
~ :... ..... ~
~ ..... ~ ~ ~
~~~<:)<:)~
~..s:':S~<-:I;::..
.... -
~ ~
~':S
bo~
~1
~ bo
~ .5
;::.. ~
't: "S
!:::l.-
~ .5
~ l::S
l::S ~
U _
.:::: ~
..c :...
~ <:)
!:::l.<:)
..s:!:::l.
-"tS
<:) ~
..c ~
.Js"tS
\U~
.~ ~
6.~
~.o
~ :...
U <:)
~ <:)
l::S !:::l.
~ ~
~ ~
.5 "'3
~ .....
E: ~
~.s
':S :...
- ~
~ ~
<:)"tS
..c .
~ ~ ~
"tS :... ~
~<:)..s:
f ~ ?-.
~U~
u.:::: ~
~..c ~
r~ ~....
'.J !:::l. ~
r'l
~":
.
..
Conclusion
In examining both the pros and the cons to the use of permeable pavement systems in
shoreland areas, it is worth noting the purpose for which the shoreland rules were written:
To manage the effects of shoreland and water surface crowding, to prevent
pollution of surface and ground waters of the state, to provide ample space on
lots for sewage treatment systems, to minimize flood damages, to maintain
property values, to maintain historic values of significant historic sites, and to
maintain natural characteristics of shorelands and adjacent water areas,
shoreland controls must regulate lot sizes, placement of structures, and
alterations of shore land areas. (Minnesota Rules 6120.3300, Subp. 1).
.
Because of the inter-related values that shoreland management addresses, one should
proceed cautiously with any new technology, no matter how promising, that seeks to
address certain discrete elements addressed in shoreland management.
For general purposes in shoreland management, permeable pavers should only be treated
as truly permeable when they are part of a local government's comprehensive stormwater
management program where it is but one of many tools (rainwater gardens, swales,
preservation of natural vegetation, buffer strips, low impact development, etc.) designed
to enhance infiltration and reduce surface runoff from developed areas into public waters.
One way to accomplish this is through the flexibility provisions of the rules by any local
government having the interest and resources that are clearly required if such systems are
to be effectively used as both manufacturers and researchers intend for them.
.
For the vast majority oflocal governments who lack the capacity to effectively apply and
oversee low impact design standards in stormwater management, permeable pavers may
be allowed, but there should be no credit for their use in meeting the 25% impervious
limitation. Instead, where development on a site exceeds 25% impervious and a variance
is requested, the Board of Adjustment may, on a case-by-case basis, consider the use of
permeable pavers provided there is sufficient guidance on their design, installation and
maintenance. Other conditions a LGU should consider in its variance approval would be
provisions to enhance or widen the use of natural vegetation within a buffer strip and no
use of pavers within the Shore and Bluff Impact Zones.
Peder Otterson
DNR Waters
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul,:MN 55155-4032
Tel. 651-297-2405
4
1'\,,,,"-
.-
"Ph
Leo C. Meloche
26120 Birch Bluff Road. Shorewood, MN 55331. FAX. & TEL. .M2l470-1770
1S'1.-
September 26, 2004
RECEIVED
SEP 2 7 2004
errv OF SHOREWOOD
City of Shorewood
Mayor & City council
c/o Planning Department
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood,:MN 55331
. Subject: Hardcover, Dick and Kelly Cassidy residence
Dear Mayor, Council and Planning Department;
Please be advised that as next-door neighbors to the Cassidy's we would be pleased for
them to have a three car garage.
We feel that it serve them well, enhance the neighborhood, improve property values and
fit well with the ambiance of the neighborhood.
.
We request that you approve this variance for the benefit of the Cassidy's and the
community in general.
Leo Meloche
-Y}1IJ4Utl/ ~
Marcia Meloche
, "aOOM3~QH,~:JO_A!~9,
, -------tOOlt I1JO--
--- 0:11\'3:)38 h__ - ,-
dd;?; 8' y~.efj
/il1f( 7N(lr9{ J:>~-dd )='lv-b )71o:i' .
---- _-.'i:dPi.J;k f?
'''~i>-~?~-f/;j )~I" /;lI!&7r1?dlf? );d7VI-i}7 )v{
J'a/'rI(J~Y l ra J.t ~r -/ ,h ( ~-I J> Y I ~ v-/ ..',1'7 ,h! ({ (" -;r'-11
-~-I-(7/ )J-f/Lu '7
~l?)--3f??-j,N~~ )-i.lJ?Jo-l ~ V/' <4-;~ .p /,t/ V1 1 rat
/1?(p,N ).-((?f/ -"?-- lU" yl ~ N/:::I -1/ ~! ~ -I Co V~
(1;/-/;(.?!)--/-7../ /(?7/~' jbMf--l17f'f'.I./?r./V /h-fT o~J ~ If).>
c?./-' }+;li"'C'h.~~/ -~-fI /Y/;r.?/11 .J-v~(?-!dj~ .
'~i;;;:n;~;j- ~'rJ (pP ) ,/ ':::>,,1//?cP./ '"7> )'~ -<?>ode? t? _..1 ./t'?/f ;:;Pi-d-
I . /' / '/ I ' 7;;1 , -r ,', "
';':;h9$/ -;-f' -!-k-J.;d~1 ~ !/-/' /;> i:h> ;1n.r:? ,~/'j;./~/if/ "
~'" ,P ,)&CJ/ ~ /' 1H l4't:;? ./ ~../k,v.~/ -;.,r-L'
,'HrYf~~ir/ )/.?N/.?~?;? --1-/(00
/>t/pJ! -ddl1JfiJ
Y;j:J~~--'(j;li-~-Zh~./ ~~/Jj,?r-l ~ .?LI-U/TVl ,''de!/)
j.::> rPc?/1-1 d --It?f '7'
I/?~.J/~ ""?r 4J///f dji? ~ .--
'"
..
.. "
0-52-01 \J+VJ VSW07 "d +rv
... .....
..,...
~-
~....
.
.
. '. ;:'
'J'i' r! \ !..,
\JG
;E
70 .
ll)
~
~
. .......
9J~"/,..br
J
~
j ~
~
\ .
\
-../ .
-----
.
N'
o
?()
A.n
.
.~
.--
------
,"
i~t~
EXISTING I
~O I.~.
~
~-
\
'~
October 2, 2004
City of Shorewood
Mayor & City Council
c/o Planning Department
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
.
Dear Mayor, Council and Planning Department
We have recently seen the house plans and building layout for the proposed construction at 26140
Birch Bluff Road in Shorewood. As neighbors to the Cassidy's, we would like to acknowledge our
support of the proposed construction.
The house plans that Mr. Cassidy showed us look very appealing. The home looks like a home
that would enhance the neighborhood, improve property values and fit well with the ambiance of
the neighborhood. We understand that this new construction could last approximately 9 months
versus a 3 phase remodel which could take up to 3 years.
Since this new construction actually reduces the overall impervious surface by up to 37%, we
request that you approve this variance for the benefit of the Cassidy's and the community in
general.
. Thank you,
~&bfI~
N~
~......
~^
<A~
~(
~
~
-I
::r
Ol
;:::,
""
~
e:
.
COm(/)
(1)..c S'
;:::'e:o
~(1)CD
OlC/)_
:- - ::r
--.
::rC/)
Ol;:::,
-(1)
~:e
c8
Ol;:::,
:gC/)
a2"
< 0
(1) cr.
_0
::r ::l
(if Ol
<s.
Ole:
~.Ol
;:::, '<
Qm
O'~
:'Q
::rC/)
(1)_
e-::r
CD (1)
~~
:::!'I (1)
-:=l
g,~
:;; ~r
(1)"0
0(1)
Ol<
~ o'
o:~
'<..(I'J
(I'J e:
Ol~
::lOl
~Q
::re-
(1),<
8c
3"0
36"
c::: w
;:::, .....
~~
::i" :e
. (1)
<---I
(1)::r::r::r
Cil(1)~(1)
c:::::l::e::r
UJ.~.o 0
Olcoe:c
w. ~ a: ~
"Op. (1) "0
::r3-::l-
~.'.g .~~
(1)o.;:::'UJ
m' Q:;;
3:E-!a
0(1)i6:s:
o.e:::l'"
(1). ::l (1) .
<:0. -. 0
c:; " co Ol
2:~ ~~
o.~ 0-'
::r_..,o.
o 8.::r'<
o .... 0 UJ
c'.s:. O::r
-'Olo. 0
~ _ __. :e
~3:.g ~
(1)'.(I'J ~ e:
e:, ::l ~ UJ
~.~ (1) 0"
0C:;"00
w8a""
,<::l"O<
(1)UJ(1)(1)
Ol c:r ~-<
Cil e: '< Ol
. s.<"O
o',~~
?ffiOl
8 (I'J S'
c:::OlCO
-::l'
0.0.
- -I
Ol:::!'I::r
UJ - (1)
~:e::r
"O~O
"g:e3
o _.(1)
x-
-. ::r 0"
3 -0
Ol::r""
ar(1)(I'J
- Ol =
'<3'"
(Oe-(1)
-'Ol
3~::r
000
;a (1) 3
irg,(1)
~9?:E
"'00(1)
"8 ::r::r
~Q;1~
oC(1)
-~..,
- ;0 (1)
i60Q
"OOl::l
..,o.c::!:
o -.'<
"O::lUJ
o (/) (1)
(I'J ::r (1)
(1)0::l
0...,_
0(1)::r
0:e(1)
::S0::r
UJOo
c:ro.e:
c. UJ
~)>(1)
OUJ"O
?::lii)
(1)::l
cO' UJ
::r Ol
e- ::s
o a.
Cile-
_c
0=
:;;9:
(1)c5
0-
Ol~
(l'JO
~.c
a. -
'<..0'
UJ ..,
- -
:ei[
(1) ",
:ea
g"O
a:~
= (1)
@o.
a-8
::s
Ol(I'J
~c:r
::s5
Ocr.
:eo
(1)::S
a. Ol
co -
(1)1'.)
om
c.......
..,~
.
CJ
(1)
Ol
..,
:s:
Ol
'<
o
:"
(/)01n:s:o
::r ..... 0...... ;:::;.:
001 ~"<
@01"1J00
:eOOl"'-
ooSQO(/)
o c::: -. 0 ::r
a. ::s ::s _. 0
- ~co -< @
:S:,.....CJ{):e
z~qggg
O1e-Ol::lo.
ffi :::0 ~ Q.
wO(1)
.......Ol::s
a. _
o
o
e:
::l
Q.
Ol
::s
a.
"1J
ii)
::s
::s
S'
co
CJ
(1)
"0
Ol
~
3
(1)
::s
-
o
o
a-
0'"
(I)
..,
.!'>
I'.)
o
o
.J:o.
-.:t
o
o
N
N
....
Q)
..c
-B
o
- "0
Cea,.....
Q)O~
=Eo:::~
o~ lo
"Or:::co..clO
o ::s o.::S
~8~u~
~ .c:- CL~ -
o 0- C C "0
.J::. U -- ::s 0
~~~8~
000..1o~
~~ 100
=CO.Qr-.J::.
U~Olo(/)
-
r:::
Q)
~
ea
a.
Q)
C
c:D
C
.2
C
ea
0..
"'0
C
co
.(3
C
::s
o
U
0....
-.:t::s
"""0
~Q)
_ c:D
co "0
cJQ
03:
:ag
-E-tS
mea
8.9
"O~
Q) =
~J2
a. ::s
K~
~~
....rii
,g-~
_ "0
S.U)
~UJ
coea
-u
c:DQ)
-~ :6
~o
::s-
..c~
"'0 0
C ..c
co .J::.
(J) .~
CQ)
ea r::: .
_ C
a.mo
Q)<(:a
m - 2
5"0-
.J::.g~
Q)3:8
:6~"O
cOQ)
Q).J::. en
Q) CI) 0
mr:::a.
~:; e
r:::eaa.
Q)OQ)
~O::::6
....:=-
Q)::l0
>-~
ea m 0
.J::..J::. a.
Q)~a.
3:jjj~
~
g.
ea
~
....
ea
Q)
C
.
Q) 15 en
E .J::.
o ~c..;
.J::.r:::0
ea-~ E
Q)..cm
~E~
.- ea-
U; J9
~Q)co
0:6 E
.Q :6 Ox
Q)-- 0
E 3: ....
_a.
~ CD fir
Q)3:_
..c:q:~
I- -
. -g "0
c:Dea::s
.5 m 8
(ij~r:::
Q) - 0
a. co =
a.>Otn
~~-E~
Q)~~~
~ e 8~
00.3:.9
.QQ)Q)a.
en~c::s
::l....enQ)
~ ~;S'"ffi
3: .- - -
o-C-eaJ2
.J::.0:6::s
en 0"0 0
~-E c 0
::2o~"fi
en..c ~._
~-g,Q)-S:
U .- "0 ;;>
Q)c-
...:r:::::l~
~Q)Q)O
m:6;S:E
.J::.~ ~
~c-gQ)
cjgo~
coc-E.J::.
a.Q)oo.
Q)"O..c~
~ "S -g, ea
o 0.- m
.J::.3:~:::J
Q)mQ)f!
t=:6:6~
Q)
3:.5
::!i..c:-
o o_
r- c
~ ::s
oE
-E
0.0
::So
~Q)
..c..c:
Q)-
0"0
~ffi
::Sm
UJ-
en~
:::J.-
om
.- m
~ea
Q)U
a.Q)
E.J::.
.--
=15
e_
Q)t;:::
>Q)
Or:::
Q)Q)
.J::...o
-Q)
m.J::.
Q) -
o ....
::s,g
~~
~c
= ea
COOl::
3ea
0>
earn
r::::.2
0-
:a~
2e
- a.
mOo
Cco
8::s
3:0
Q)>-
cm
m.J::.
;Sica
Q)Q)....
O:::JQ)
C e- c
cn~~
::it
g.
~
r:::
ea
.J::.
I-
.
t;
3
~
~
'^
:r
"
J)
N
N
f
l
~
,
-i
::T
0)
~
...-
~
e:
.
cgCiJQ?
~..o~
~ai~
~!e.~
s: Cir
0) ~
.....(1)
~==
e:n
0)0
-o~
-o!e.
a 2
< n
(I) r=
Stg
w-O)
<n
O)e:
iii'O)
~ '<
~ CiJ
erg.
-. n
Stm
CDSt
g(l)
~~
:::tICD
.....OJ
So=
St ~r
(1)-0
(')CD
0)<
~ cf
o:~
'<..m
mc
~iir
~~
::To-
(1),<
nc
0-0
3.....
30
e: w
~ .....
~~
S':E
CD
C6StSt:;!
@ (I) a (I)
e:~:E::T
U) ~.o 0
0) <g- So ~
Wo-a.CD
-0 0 CD-o
::T3-~-
0) 0 ::T 0)
moO)~
(I) a. ~ m
...,. 0 ~
(I) <::(1) Sf
3<::..........
o .~ ~ 3:
a..c ~ -.
~~(I)'
:E a. -. (')
::T(I)<g-fg
-- @ 0- m
g.iifoo:
8 ~ 3-'<
a.Om
e:St8..5"
~.. a :-. :E
~ 2:~ ~
(l)U)-.c
e:~Om
-O(l)C6(5"
5==-00
w8a~
di ~ ~ _~
0) ..... :1.....
@20<0)
. n<-o
cr e!. ~
~e:0)
8(1)-
m S'
e:O)ee
- ~ .
~a.-i
O):::tI::T
m ..... CD
;-~::T
-0-0
-0-3
a ~.CD
~. St 0
~~~
CD m
- 0) =
'<3"'-
co 0-(1)
-'0)
3~::T
Ono
a (I) 3
iI So (I)
~~:iE
-00(1)
-0 ::T ::T
g.ro2!
OC(l)
-=::-.
St-nCD
(I) 6' ~
-OO)~
...,a.C!:
o -.'<
-o~m
OcnCD
m ::T CD
(l)o~
0....._
nCD::T
o:E(I)
~O::T
moo
2- a. e:
. m
g)>(I)
om-o
?~Di"
(I) ~
cO- m
::T 0)
0- ~
o a.
@o-
.....e:
0=
a.
~_.
(I)~
(')-
O)~
mo
~.c
a. -
'<..er
m -.
- -
:E::T
(1)(1)
~a
e: -0
-0
a.m
= (I)
@a.
n
5g
O)U)
n -
...-2
~n
Od;
:EO
m~
a. 0)
ee .....
(1)1\.)
00>
e:~
-.~
o
.
o
(I)
0)
-.
cn01n=-(')
::T.....a-::=..;:+
001 ~'<
CiJ01J;!OO
==(')0)-'-
005120cn
o c __ (') ::T
a. ~ ~ _. 0
- ~ee.ct CiJ
3: (')0 ('):E
z c~ 0 8
010-0)5Q.
01 :1n
w:::03=
wO(l)
~O)~
a. _
s::
0)
'<
o
--.
(')
o
e:
~
S2.
0)
~
Q.
-0
0)
~
~
S'
ee
o
CD
-0
0)
~
(I)
~
-
o
6-
0-
(I)
-.
,!'.)
I\.)
o
o
~
~
Leo C. Meloche
26120 Birch Bluff Road. Shorewood, MN 55331. FAX. & TEL. .G:t27470-1nO
15'1-
September 26, 2004
RECEiVED
SEP 2 7 2004
c,TV OF SHOREWOOD
City of Shorewood
Mayor & City council
c/o Planning Department
5755CotUltry Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
. Subject: Hardcover, Dick and Kelly Cassidy residence
Dear Mayor, Council and Planning Department;
Please be advised that as next-door neighbors to the Cassidy's we would be pleased for
them to have a three car garage.
We feel that it serve them well, enhance the neighborhood, improve propertY values and
fit well with the ambiance of the neighborhood.
We request that you approve this variance for the benefit of the Cassidy's and the
community in general.
.
~~
'-rntVtU-dI ~
Marcia Meloche
Leo Meloche
\
DRAFT
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING A SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR DICK AND KELLY CASSIDY
WHEREAS, Dick and Kelly Cassidy (Applicants) propose to demolish the existing
home at 26040 Birch Bluff Road, and build a new home on the property, said property being
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the plans submitted by the Applicants result in an impervious surface area
to lot area ratio that exceeds the maximum established by the Shorewood Zoning Code, and the
Applicants have therefore made application for a variance; and
.
WHEREAS, the Applicants' request was reviewed by the City's Planning Director,
whose recommendations are set forth is a staff report, dated 29 September 2004 and subsequently
revised on 21 October 2004, both of which staff reports are on file in the Shorewood City Hall;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on 5 October 2004 and, after deliberation, the Planning Commission recommended
denial of the requested variances; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their regular meeting held on 25 October 2004 reviewed
the material submitted by the Applicant, written and oral public testimony, the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and the Planning Director's staff reports.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
The Applicant's property is located in an R-1C/S, Single-Family Residential/Shoreland
zoning district which requires a 35-foot front yard setback, a 50-foot setback from the
ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka, and a total side yard setback of thirty feet,
with no one side being less than 10 feet.
2.
The R-1C/S district requires 20,000 square feet of area and 100 feet of width at the
building line, whereas the Applicant's property contains 14,920 square feet of area and is
approximately 90 feet wide at the building line, making it nonconforming with
Shorewood zoning standards.
3.
The Shorewood Zoning Code provides that a nonconforming lot of record is buildable as
long as it complies with 70 percent of the minimum lot width and area requirement for
the zoning district in which the property is located.
~
,
.
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
b.
The subject property is currently occupied by a single-family home with an attached
garage and a small (64 square feet) accessory structure, located approximately 13.5 feet
from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka.
The new home proposed by the applicants contains 8257 square feet of floor area on three
levels (including the basement). In addition the proposed three-car garage would have
887 square feet of area.
The R-1 CIS district provides for a maximum impervious surface ratio of 25 percent,
whereas the applicants' property currently has 33.7 percent impervious surface.
The plans submitted by the applicants would result in an impervious surface to lot area
ratio of29.67 square feet of area. The applicants propose to mitigate the 4.67 percent
variance by using a permeable paver driveway system.
CONCLUSIONS
That the variance requested by the Applicant constitutes a significant deviation from the
requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code.
That the Applicant's property can be put to a reasonable use under the conditions imposed
by the Shorewood Zoning Code.
c.
That the Applicant has not met the criteria for the grant of a variance under Section
1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has failed to establish any undue hardship as
defined by Minn. Stat. Section 462.357, Subd. 6(2).
d.
That the Applicant's request for the variance set forth above is hereby denied.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of
October, 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
-2-
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 18, 2004
.TO:
Mayor and Council Members
.
FROM:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
RE:
Planning,Commission Appointment
Recently, Commissioner Donna Woodruff resigned from the Planning Commission. Council
may consider extending an appointment to one of the following candidates who interviewed
earlier this year for the Planning Commission.
. Scott Williams, 5955 Country Club Road
. David Meyer, 19675 Chartwell Hill
.
This Planning Commission vacancy is to be filled for the term ending February 28,2005.
Council Action
Should appointments be made at tonight's meeting, a motion to adopt a Resolution making
Planning Commission appointments is in order.
1t- 9 fI
ft
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION MAKING PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood advertised for Shorewood residents to apply to serve
on the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did complete interviews and selection procedure for
appointment to said Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Shorewood hereby makes the following appointments to the Planning Commission effective
October 25, 2004, with the term expiration as indicated:
Planning Commission
Member:
.
Term
1.
February 28,2005
Said appointments complete the seven member Planning Commission which consists of the
following additional members: .
Member Term
2. Ann Packard February 28, 2007
3. Jeff Bailey February 28,2007
4. Kevin Conley February 28,2007 .
5. Kathe White February 28,2006
6. Bruce Gniflke February 28,2006
7. Bob Gagne February 28, 2005
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th
day of October, 2004.
ATTEST:
Woody Love, Mayor
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
..
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
.
DATE:
October 21, 2004
RE: Freeman Park - Shorewood Oaks Drainage Issue
Approval of Plans, Specifications, and Engineers Estimate
During the October 11th, 2004, City Council meeting, Staff was provided direction regarding
finalization of the design documents for the drainage way to be constructed between the properties of
26030 and 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive. Attachment 1 is a site location map for the project.
Attachment 2 is the original plan and cost estimate that WSB and Associates presented at the
September 27th, 2004 City Council work session. WSB and Associates estimated the construction
costs at $17,000.
.
The proposed plan shows a "curvilinear" alignment, which actually encroaches onto the northerly lot
owned by Mr. John Healy. Council may recall that Mr. Healy spoke at the October 11th, meeting and
stated that a curvilinear design that encroached onto his property would not be acceptable.
Furthermore, he would not be willing to grant an easement for that design. After considerable
discussion, Staff was directed to solicit proposals, based upon a straight alignment that did not require
a permanent easement from Mr. Healy.
In preparation for construction, Staff directed WSB and Associates to . survey the outlot and stake the
alignment of the drainage way in the field. After stakes were placed, it became necessary to conduct
an impromptu meeting in the field with Mr. Healy and Ms. Siverts, neighbors to the outlot.
On this date, a meeting was conducted at 2:30 p.m. to discuss the staked alignment. Mr. Healy and
Ms.. Siverts agreed to a revised alignment that is a compromise between the plan documents and a
straight centerline, which does encroach onto Mr. Healy's property of 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive.
Both property owners agreed, in principle, to the compromise. Staffwill have the alignment re-staked,
present a waiver of trespass form for construction for each property owner to execute, and have an
easement document prepared for the encroachment onto Mr. Healy's property.
{) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
irJDIt
.
.
Mayor and City Council
Shorewood Oaks Drainage;
Approve Plans, Specs. & Estimate
October 21, 2004
Page 2 of 2
The only remaining item is the details of landscaping. It was also discussed and agreed that any
replacement trees for trees removed due to construction, would be located and planted in the spring of
2005. Staff would work with both property owners to locate the tree(s), at that time, to best locate the
plantings for screening and to provide adequate clear zones for the drainage way/trail.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of the plans, specifications, and estimates prepared by WSB and
Associates, dated September 24, 2004, and as modified in this memorandum.
I~"'"
(v i7)
'..............
~
L ON
^I'\H 3.\."'11$
14~
8
I
j
~
.-~..;:h!~l{~n~~hr .~.:lt;.t~ :~;;~: T~~idn;~:.~~
". : j ~-' ....,.... .". -".
,\ _L i'I.J f"ll]~) ;~~j .j /\ !~j"\
AdVUNno~ l~r~lslcr ~3~3S W~GlS
~---.,.---._---.....--
...
...
Z
1&1
:E
::c
9-
t:B
!; J
@
-
~I 06G~
~
) i DLGS
. o:~. j OS6S
'ON AMH .3+. OOB~2 If)
L OJ
v I
\0
.
.
Project: Alternative No.1 - Bituminous Spillway to the west
Location: City of Shorewood
WSB Project Number: 01608-00 9/27/2004
. Schedule A- Bituminous SDillwav Improvement
Item Material Description Unit Estimated Estimated Estimated
No. No. Quantity Unit Price Total Cost
1 2021.501 Mobilization Lump Sum . 1 $2,000.00 $200.00
2 2104.509 Clear & Grub.Clnc.Tree relocation) Acre 0.2 $5,000.00 $1,000.00
3 2104.501 Remove Curb and Gutter Lin Ft 20 $8.00 $160.00
4 2104.513 Sawina Bituminous Pavement Un Ft 30 $5.00 $150.00
5 2105.501 Common Excavation CuYd 90 $8.00 $720.00
6 2211.501 Aggregate Base, CI V Ton 85 $20.00 $1,700.00
7 2331.514 Tvoe 2331 Base Course Mixture Ton 36 $75.00 $2,700.00
8 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter Un Ft 20 $20.00 $400.00
9 2511.501 Random RiDrap. CIIV CuYd 5.9 $75.00 $442.50
10 2511.515 Geotextile Filter, TVDe IV SQ Yd 85.5 $7.50 $641.25
11 2575.555 Turf Establishment Lump Sum 1 $2,000.00 $2.000.00
12 2573.502 Silt Fence Un Ft 100 $5.00 $500.00
Subtotal $10,610.00
25% Contingency $2,652.50
Total Estimated Construction Cost $13,262.50
28% Indirect Cost $3,714.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $17,000.00
Assumptions:
1. No easement acquisition costs were included in this estimate.
W:\01608-00\excel\cost estimate.xls\ALT-1 BIT SPILLWAY
ATTACHMENT 2
tOI'..UI
U10 'd..._
._ J ...
'UII"'~l .JIYt
"1
....."
"t>.. -alt11l1lATl11 .. 111:11.1
....
.....'el..
::J....I
-..
.-
Y1llSllMlJ831W." ...,........
..... ~ ....., A.... V fIR MIl 011
____ ~ &IlI_.1II....,.,..
JIIlWII..~"ww.... iMU UlDl AUDItt
~~
>-
<
~
-'
..JO:
-W
~W
V>Z
,-
..J~
-Z
<W
a:
I-~ ~
-. ~~ ~ 0
" -'W ~
. ..J a: ....
"".c(- _
=-. 1-0
III
~ ZIII ('
W
I-
<
(!I
..,
III
I-
III
o
~
....
x
W
I-
U
W
I-
o
0:
Q. ------
~.------)t
>- ~......" -......,..~"-
~ Z.",-.--,~ Y ...-f · y y ~ . .
~~ _. r~ ~ ~
~ w Q ~a 0 1 ). \. d
o. ~ -
:r: ( <( c w
Uz I l- to. W
0::00:.. a:
l:! ~'~ I ~ g X I- _
to. I) lD..J '..J
::HD..J x<
~ "I' IIlWN WlZ
~ ~'I ~~r;; ~~
~ 'n/', ~~:" ~~
..:i:! ;Y'''' -01"'1 ~-
g~ '" I >-
1r0
~~ i I ~ 'f-" ~
U z..... li~ I \. .. '"
W~)\J~ 0'''.'
t.. ,'~&1 ;.., I -<
..r" a:< -_ '... ~ .j j
...._..NQ..~._..-\\~\ ~ f..-' .I~~ ~ r~-_S
_.... III \ \ \ ~.Il< LLI ~
I- Ii \ .'\ ..~...r._J ""
1 i ~~ ~.\~ ;?}i: 0t1::i
I&. ~~~ ~ ....
I- ..JI- -1&f >-W- I
:..J ~ L&J...J..
::! >~u. ~~~o ~
a:ojI~ <_ .
rW~"::..-i, >Z~
r ~~ a::ffi z-,.., ~r
I gL&..B~:: co -J .
...,~. 56 ~it., ffict~
lD~~ ~.., ~>d
0:- .., ~o
~1Il0 10 Ol-W
U~I- lOa: ojIZ~
~~~ ~a lD~~
U I- U a:I-O
~~~ m ~-~
<o~ ~.... U~I&.
~-~ ~~ ~~<<
w-' ~O:W
>< ~I-~
!i:;; <. ~
W% ~~~
a:-
~"
z:::
"'...
.. Cl'l
.
~: i
YJ.OSXNNIJ\I '([OOA\.DOHS
s:IAllVNlt[J.'!V .LN:DaAOlIdWI
:!I3VNIVlI([ XlIV cI NVW:!Im1!I
10
(J)
(J)
li
(J)
.- -~
--
'Co
10
0)
(J)
li
(J)
10
co
(J)
.
:3
(J)
am.a--."~___.__~ ..--
DIt'.......Wd ':IIf...,....,.;p
__ I
_ NJII....... ~
=::_1IaII00Il1.. T
m
o
....
(J)
10
co
(J)
10
....
(J)
t;lg lD
~!~ ~
'0 +-
1) L X
LO -
o ::i
li _ · > II)I~ E .--
:::cli~;;;T>IIJ+' or
I.=l-+- I ~- ~,;z +-
r-'e'S=15~uu"'" ~
-goc:J~+Y.Locl l!--
c Ol:o/l~ ~~~.o !!
o .o52.o-~LlD~~-
- LGL OL 1).0
til~o :J L oCI X 0 . - 00
NIt: CUI&. II) mti~: it;
=l:j'i ~ ~)l ol.~ i.~N ."'w
:Olg'9~~i~ l;.t;:!:....
O-LGl.OO 1\.~6-~
::it)C)a:a:~VlUU<1- ~I-
;l ~_:: en ,., .... II) ~
_ . In It '" ~ In In 11/110.
~~~.~~~v~~~ _ ~~.
!C ~ 0 0 :;;t--.-
2 - - - N~:
-----
. !"
!
!
r .
I
o
~
~
(J)
o
....
(J)
10
~
;
...
fi
III
,
...
-
-
0'-
c
-
!
11
:
I
f
9
..
.
t
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
.
DATE:
October 21,2004
BE: Freeman Park - Shorewood Oaks Drainage Problem
Authorize Expenditure of Funds - Storm Water Management Fund
S.taff has solicited proposals from several firms to construct the drainage way/path 'as shown in
Attachment 1.
Unfortunately, due to the time of year, time frame for completion, and small size of the project, the
only firm willing to submit a proposal was Midwest Asphalt, Inc. The remaining firms declined
Staff's requests. Attachment 2' is the proposal provided by Midwest Asphalt, Inc. for an amount of
$20,955.00.
.
Representatives of Midwest Asphalt stated that they are able to perform the work at this rate since their
firm is currently mobilizing equipment for a previous contract with the City of Shorewood for the
bituminous overlay project. The overlay project will commence on Monday, October 25th. If awarded,
this project would occur simultaneously to the overlay project.
Staff is recommending acceptance of the proposal provided Midwest Asphalt, Inc. Staff is
recommending that the amount of expenditure be authorized not to exceed $25,000 to provide for
contingencies. If approved, this proj ect will be funded by the City's Storm Water Management Fund.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending authorization for the expenditure of funds from the Storm Water Management
Fund not to exceed $25,000, for the proposal included as Attachment 2 and modified herein.
ft
\..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLEO PAPER
# lOB
tcV..VI
iI1II ...........
,.-.1 ...
'iR' - "21' ....
_'11_. ..1..wn11&'" "IOU
-
....
.. .'1''-
:1.-11I1
-..
."
1M..... ..........-.. III"" au .....
_~IJItCD't,l.,."....tMI_
'''- ...-.a.s DJllilI '" ... _:Ill .. .......
J'" ..~'M'V" .PIll Alt_.......
~~I-
~~ .~
'" III
>-
~
..
.J
.JO:
-w
o.W
",Z
,-
.JO
-z
~W W
0: I-
t->- ~
~ ~! r~ ~ l
~ .~~~~ t--.--::
:ain > ;>. ,"""'._-ll .1I,-f 1 V ., ~ ., .
-;;<1..., .)" Z' y.qo; J ( >-
........ X W - .). ~
uJ (J ~Q 0 J \ I w ~
:eLl, ~ow
~ \ I ~~~ ~
II: \ r 11I0 X -
l&.. II 1D-'.oJ
:JlD.J X~
~ " IIIWN w~
~ J bl~r~ E~
II: 1-- 1-0
_ ""'ij "'~.. OZ
.J I ZO:. 0:-
"'~~. 0.... 0.-
~! i I I' '1~ '-
~=.? ' ~
tiz S I "')
o.CI \ !. ::I.
__..~...---- :-, ~\) \' '" r ~ rr
I- \1 \ ,"i~;' t- !
\ 2 " \ ~i\-" 01ll.J
,\ _ \ ". zo
. ...J _" i.l ,~ ~o.. ~
.......~-g- ,:..".. \ ~~ ~ ~- j:
r ~ / \ ~\" \~.J~T
.) 0:J \ \ i'1. ~cl t;
.....\ ~; ~~. 'I'. ,I.J~llD 8 ~
\ ~ .~ ~fi.\~\} I
\ l></j \...~~\ I
~2 _ - \. _~Ll.-L
~ ~) ~.~ SHO
~ . '"g!' P 'li'~~ \
11:'" a ~ :Ji
I&. >-w.... _ CI .
I- ~I= ft 1if >-w- I
.J Clit ~~~_ ~
- 0:>'" ~. ~~:,.;Y~
r"w~-=,-l , ~Z14
r ~~o:~ z- wi
, sl&.a wt- OO...J .
z I=l; W.J ~~~
"'0. ::ICI lD.....l!I t->..J
lDj:~ CI.., t- w
0:- .., ::10
:Jill 0 m ClI-~
UZ'" m~ ""z-
~:~ ~G ~~~
;:Jt-W 0 ~I-O
~<a::: ltI o:iiii
~eS ~~ I-~O:
..J ::IO:W
w.J Ol-t-
>~ ~ ...
~t; ~~G
wz
0:-
\.
.
V.LOs:!INNIN 'aOOMmOHS
WALLVNlIU'lV J.NDaAOlldJ\lI
:.iIDVNIVlIa XHV cI NV.W:.iI:.iIU
h"tJlU_Iilir.____-.~...."IaUll'c.ll".
1llIO-l__ ...-..
:::........... ' SSM
~...-UIlIIOIIJ~" T
~ m 31 ii ~ m
,! !.
: : :: :::: II : : : : I : : : : I : : : : II' : j' : II .: ':1' .: : :-'.
. ... I .. .. ....j.... .... . .
_....1.-__1...-_""'1____1- .... -'---"
:::: I:: : : i ::: : I: ::: . :: :: :: ::::
.. .. I .. . . : : .. . t . . . .1. . . . ~;;; . . : : i : : : :
-~..~.:..:,..:...:...:...:..~_:..:..~ "':"':"":"':"'1":":"":"':"- !5 ~ I---.t.-.-
,... !.. . . I' . .. .... .... 0... z:. . . '1' . . .
.... i... .1....1.. ..,.... 011I III 0 .... ....
. . . . I . . .. .... I . . . .", . . . . ClCI III -
. ." .... .... i .. .. '_:":''':'''':''' ~~ ~ I- ~:-t-:.:..:..:...
>- !filii d ~ ....!....
<z: ~~ W VI ...."....
3:0 0 II)
-' _III ~ I- .... I . . . .
-' j: ____ .. ~ lD Z -:-:-:-~r':--:-'-'
.....u W~ W W I
CLW ~_!C ::ii :::: ::::
~VI t-1:3 w ....1....
._ :J: -' ~ ~ ~ ~ :-:-:-:t-:-:--:-:-
_ ~~ ::;:~ ~ CL :::: I : : : :
... CL __ -,.,....... ';..,:i t. t- .... I . . . . I~
- ~ 0 . ~ -.- : . -:, '\. I I tj ~':-r-:-:-I;;
-=~1J ~1- I-~) ~: : : : I: : : : -
I l1) .___"::":" ;.. . Vl ~':"':.F.":"
: : : : I : : : : I : : : : I : : : : i : : : : ;~:'..:I ) : : : : , : : : :
.........I....I....j.... ..;..V ....\....
0.~-F~.~r.~T: . : :~-:-!~~ : : I' . . . 'I'~' '1' . .. , . . . '1: : : >t-:-:-.:-:-
: ::: i :: : : ',:::: :::: I:: :: ::::!:::: I: ::: I : :: : I: : : : I: : : :
. . . . I . . . . i . . . . . . . . . ! lC.IlJI'b~^31'2i . . .. .... I . . . . I'~~' I . . . .
_.-1-- I -+____~l:L- _:-1_ __j---1~---'-
. . . . ! . . .. .... I . . . . I . . O~Z.l. 'tJ.S I . . . . \ . . . '1' . . . I . . . . I . . . .
: :: : I' :::: I::: : i:: :: I :: :: \' : :: : I: : : : I : ::: :::: :::: I : : : :
....:....:...~..:.......:...:...:._:..L...:....:..:J..:...:...:_:.J..:...:....:...:......:...:....:...:-..~ .:...:.j":"':"':"+ . . . I . . . '[1 .. :...:..
. . . . i . . . . I . . . . 1 . . . . , . . . . i 'j" .... "': I : .. .1.." ....
:::: I:::: I: :8:: :::: I:::: I:::::::: ,::::!:: :i:: :::: :::: Is
-:-:-:-:~I' . .-:-T:'.. :-:-:-'-l':'-:-~l-:'" l,-:-~r:-:-:-T-:' .-:'-:-: \. . ':-:-1"
::::1::::1::::.1::::1::::1::::'1::::1::::\::4::':::':::::
~:...:..:l..:...:....:...:L:.~" .'I...:..:....:...:...~_.:....:....:+: . ., . ~...:..:l..:...:-:.:.;...:...: .. .:...:...~~.+...:....:._:...:...,
. . . . r. .' . . ! . . . -:I.. . . . i . . . .,\ . . . '1' . . . ! . . . . 1 : : .. .,..... I . . . .
. .. . ,. . .. I .. . .,1 . ., . I . . .. .... ....,.... I . . ., ..:: I : : . .
..:..~-~.j.:...:..:..~h.~~~~..:J~~ I :~l ~~~~ : : I : : : : t-:":"~.:":"
::::I::::I::4':!::::\::::f::::r:::I::::\::::I::::f1::::
::::I::::L::::::!::::~::::I:::*::I:::T:::::::::
: : : : I : : : : I : :': : i : ::-:f"::::! -: : : : I: : : : . : :::t:::: :::: ::::
. . . .1 .. . .1. . . .1. . . '1' . . .1. .. '1:' . . .1. . : : I : : :. ....,....
-d~+~+~-:--l' :.: : :i : : : : I~ : : : il: : : ttIIttlJ. :::: ::: :p:-:-
.,. .\... .I....!.... ....\:.. '\0'" ....,.... .... I....
.< : I ::: :Fl~: : :+::: :::: I ::.:-: ~ : : I: : +~~
: : : : I' : : : : i : : : : II : : : : I : : : : '\ : : :: :: lil >- . :
.... ....1.........1.... ....!..!:C!: ~":on 01... <oonO .
----+----+---......---I-.--...j.--r ::E'" - 0 0'" Non" en - en on ,.,id' - -.
. .. . I .. .. I .. .. I .. ",. . . . '1' . ., ..;::~ :
::::,:::: I:::: I:::: :::: :::: :: ~~ .
. . . . ! ., .. .. .'. I' . .. I ., . ., . .. . i' . .
---1----;--- I i-.t ~ ~ --
: : : : i : : : : I : : : : I : : : : I : : : : ! : : : :1 :: !: II) te- :ll ~ '" Vi :
....1..... .... ....I....~....l.. ~ elllleUe ece-.
. . .. ....!.... ..,. .... .... .. 5 b boo :l :;J 6 :!iF :;J'
---+----4-----.1---- --- -.--+ .J
:::: I:::: I:::: I:::: I:::: I:::: I:: =
: : : : I, : : : : I, : : : : . : : : : I ~~ .:~~t~ ~~~~l : : "2 .
t... Iii -.-
-,--:-:-~-:-'r:-:-:' . -~-:-:-.--r:--:-:--:' i -:-~-:T' -:- LC
....j....I....!I....l..,.!.... .. 1-.
~_~~J.:...:..:..:.S: : I : : : :1 :.~.t!.~~~ ~ ~-I!
. . ., i . . . .!. . .. I .... . ! ., .. ....,.. .:: : ,.
:::: I:::: I:::: I: :':: i::: :tl:::: \:: ...le.5l
....\.. ..\.... I.... I.... Ft'.. ., -Ie II
----,-------r-- '-r-- x ~ 1; ~ u -
. . . '1' . .. !. ... I' . . ' I" .. .... .. 2 ..... 0 ... c
.... . 0.0. {......... .... .0.. .. .... 1;:JL X ~
: : : : I : : : : I : : : : I : : : : I : : : : , : : : :-L ~ l.~::Ill. i.:..
___.-!-_+----I---:-+--\..-I ~ .f l. 'O:!: ~ >:~ II)
: : : : i: : : : i : : : : I : :: : I : : : : I :fulli: : : . :: ~ ~~:~~ ~u ~~ i
.:::\....1....1....\....,...... '02560-U.u", 2!'
'---t--r----.~.- ---t- -. 5.s:1..: t t ~ :: t:i14= ii~-
::::j::::\::::I::::I::::j:::::: 6 D~DCgeo:!5 =:
: : : : i : : : : i : : : :+. : : : : ! : : : : i : : :: :: :; I:l ~ l. ~ oj! .~ b · - I ~.g .
I-__~_-+--' -.-..-t---.+---. S c 0... II ~ lD t ~ ~I~ t --
.., .T~...j"" ... .H'....!...... ---.." !li~QNIII&.W:
. . . . , . . . . " . , . . L' . . . I ' . .. .... .. - l. D > > call l. I..
. . . . i . . .. ..... .... I . . ., .... .. - . '! g g'i':: I}; 2l ~ !:I"[ .
. . . . I . . . . I . . .. ....!.... .... ., -R (11.00 Ii:! ,>,~ - :l .
-.-+----f--. -- :! 0 CI 0: 0: If) II) 0 u_~... 1I)~7
....\....,....\.... ....\...... _ _ I'" ~~ on
. . . . , . . . . , . . .. ....,.... .... .. ol 0;' ~ '" Ie 10.: III .
....11....'.... ....I'....j....'.. _.lI1ititIl'V 1~U1 U1 11'>.
, , ""i~ . ......... I,: .
....:...:...:..:+.:...:...:....:...rl.-:..:..:t.:.. ....r.....t....:..: ~Zl~ 0" ....;;;I;;.....~~-
. . . . I . . .. .... .... J . 0 .. 0" 0 I . . ~ Ii:': - _. -.- ~ 0
::::I::::I::::,::::i::::j'::::f'::::E .
....:... . . 1..:...:...:...:......:..:.~..:il..:...~.~,..:..L..:...:....:... ...:....:.....:....:. .. !: ~ ....Iroi '" ..
.:-:-:1'....1.... ....t....t.... .... .....,.... . r .,
::::1::::1:::: ::::1::::1::::\::::1:::.: :::: :j::
3l
~
C>>
~~~
_:.-
Co
II)
C>>
C>>
g
C>>
II)
!XI
C>>
o
!XI
C>>
II)
r--
C>>
o
r--
C>>
.
I
..
~ ...
... z
I 1&1
:E
f-- :I:
()
=
ti
-
!
1
f
J
{
lio
.
OCT-07-2004 10:34 WSB & ASSOCIATES
10/07/04 09:23 FAX 952 252 0172
MIDWEST ASPHALT
t
ORPORATION
.
Attn: p~~~ ~..~!I.Ien~:..~g, ~E. .
Job: ~~:.~~an !~k .'Qr~~~.~~ ~mprovement
City: ~horwood ___._...._ ...._.. ..... .
Engineer: ~SB & Assoc. ___ .....n_ ._._... . .
Date: October 7,2004
....--....-----...-.-.... -... .
Section: C?~~j~~.~. ~.i.~U~i!'O~US Pay.ing
Estimator: Matthew J. Timmers
. . - -. .-...------... .. - -. ..-.
No. Item
'Pay'Items- --.--.-..--.--..--.-...... .1
Mob' ...:.~~:....~~..~._~...:~"~.~~._---:.-. '1 LS !
Clear "__" . . A~...
. 'Grub'.'--. AC .
ClearTrec......--.-...- ........__.._..._.u EA'
... ... ... ."'" ... .-................... ... .. .. .
Grub Tree EA
. M..____. ._.._. ___..__._...__.
Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter LF
Remove'FieiiCFi Drain..... ----...-....... EA I
'~aw Curb. LF' :
.~~.I.y!'g~l' R.~jns~!L~~!.!!t:~L.._. ......_. .~~. .,
Common Excavation CY :
.....................- ........ -......-.-...... .
Common Borrow (CIay) CY
CIS Lil-nestone'" . TN :
......... _._____.__ . _u ... .. ._.......... . . ...' .
Type 41A Wear TN
.f\.fachine Fonned Bitwninous Curb' .... . LF
..-.----.
Concrete Curb & Outter LF :
.. . . . . .~~!t!:~IJ.~.e_.___.._._. _...__...._. _' . _ f..F:
Turf Establishment ! LS :
.. ......_.........___.... ..._ ...___..._.. . ~ ....... . ..l
7635411700 P.01/01
I4J 001/001
P.O. BOX 5477 . HOPKINS, MINNESOTA. 55343
PHONE: (952) 937-8033 . FAX: (952) 937.6910
111
All Taxes Included
Bond Not Included,
If Needed Add 1.Oo,lg
DBElSBE
Participation 0,0 %
.
.. .0.. ....1 ....... ....... ....._ ...._._......... ._........_................ OM..
,
I
I.
Unit Cost Bid Amount
..-. ...- ..
1.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
0.10 $4 800.00 . .. $48b~oo
_... __ .__.._.. ....2.--...
0.10 $4,200.00 $420.00
"-''''-'2.00 -.-... $300.00 --...... . .... $600.00
. ..._~:QQ _.._.... _ .~~:4.Q.:9(f.~.... . .-- $4fO,OO
35.00 $10.00 $350,00
. "-Y:oo ..- -... "$72fo<f - .... ... .. ...... '17-25.00
5.00 ..... '$12.00 -.-...-.. ... ..... $60.00
. ~.OQ . ..~~Q.:.Qo. . $.1 ~9,09
90.00 $25.00 $2,250.00
]2.00'." $25.00..... . . ....... $300'.00'
..?_Q:9.9...... . . $3~.OO $3~150.0O'
56.00 $65.00 $3,640.00
. 440:0C) ....$5jS......--.--...- $2::fl'O.OO'
. -... 35:00 .--. """'$4.2:00' .--'-."-'-$1,470.00
......... 50.0Q.. . '$6.00 .. ... ..... "$3:00.'00
1.00 $3 300.00 $3,300.00
........ .._._. ..._.......z:::.,__...._ _._.._..._._.......__
1'. .
Total Bid 1
.. '~I
$20,955.00 I
. Sub'gra.de test roll and/or subgi'iffie to be accepted oy'the engineer before Midwest Aspnalt will tOlerance-- ...... .. "'1
; and.J?la~~.a~grega.t~ base, Any subgrade correction required will be done on aT & M ~asis:.. ...._..._..._....... ......... .. .... ...J
Notes:
-...
NAPA
--
~063.WK4
ATTACHMENT 2
f
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474.0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
.
DATE:
October 21,2004
RE: Update County Road 19 - Smithtown Road Intersection Improvement
Bids were received and opened on Wednesday, October 20, 2004, for the County Road 19 -
Smithtown Road Improvement Project. Attachment 1 is the Bid Tabulation for the project.
The low bid was provided by Eureka Construction; Inc., for a total bid amount of$ 3,566,322.45.
Table 1 is a summary of the bids received.
.
Firm
Eureka Construction, Inc.
Park Construction
Hardrives, Inc.
Midwest As halt Inc.
Bituminous Roadwa s, Inc.
En ineers Estimate
Amount Bid
$ 3,566,322.45
$ 3,901 534.86
$ 3,936,121.99
$ 3,998,641.80
$ 4,131,833.78
$ 3 147,978.50
Table 1
Council will recall that bids had been rejected from the original bidding of the project. At that time,
the original low bid was $4,049,602.79.
Table 2 below, is a breakdown of the associated costs for each entity.
=FF/OC
ft
~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
..
..
.
.
Mayor and Council
Update County Road 19 Intersection
October 21, 2004
Page 2 of 3
AGENCY
AMOUNT
$ 3,566,322.45
Bid Amount
Shorewood State Aid Roadwa
Shorewood State Aid Storm Sewer
Shorewood State Aid Streetsca in
Subtotal Shorewood State Aid Fund
635,216.30
280,622.17
65,982.33
981,820.80
$ 50,910.00
$ 50,910.00
Shorewood Local Roadwa
Subtotal Shorewood Local Roadwa Fund
Total City of Shorewood
$ 1,032,730.80
$ 2,087,307.10
$ 153,158.24
$ 118,980.50
$ 57,938.22
$ 2,417,384.06
Table 2
Other costs that are to be added to the total project costs for the City of Shorewood are right of way
costs, construction engineering, signal equipment supplied by Hennepin County and the
undergrounding of utilities. Table 3 represents the current estimated values for these items, based on
the time of the writing of the cooperative agreement.
Mayor and Council
Update County Road 19 Intersection
October 21, 2004
Page 3 of 3
.
Right of Way Acquisition Costs (per Coop
A reement)
Construction Engineering (8.0% of Final Construction
Per Coo . A reement)
Portion of Signal Cabinet and Equipment Supplied by
Henne in Count
Portion of Undergrounding of Utilities
$ 250,000.00
$ 285,305.80
$ 5,940.00
$ 37,282.81
Total
$ 578,528.61
Table 3
Undoubtedly, there will be fluctuations in the final amounts, since some of the items are based upon
percentages of final construction. Knowing that "the question will be asked", the total that is
considered the City of Shorewood's portion (including all of the Shorewood State Aid amounts) would
then be estimated at $1,032,730.80 + $578,528.61 or $1,611,259.4L Again, it is vitally important to
note that $1.523.066.60 of the above total is eligible for State Aid reimbursement.
.
Having stated this, Staff was performing status checks with the Department of Minnesota State Aid
during compilation of this report. Much to our surprise, Staff was informed that while the City of
Shorewood had placed a reserve for advance funding with the State Aid Office, that funds were not
guaranteed. Fund availability was dependent upon a first come first serve basis. At that time, (the
State had many reserves anticipated, but few projects that had been bid. The State now reports that
zero funds are currently available for advancement. While Staff acknowledged that there was not any
guarantee of funds being available, that the State reported that the funds appeared to be available for
this project.
This late development has forced Staff to reconsider the financing alternatives to be considered. It is
probable that the City may need to consider the selling of bonds for Shorewood's portion of the
project. Payment for the bonds, bonding costs and interest can be reimbursed by the City's annual
state aid allotment over time. While this would encumber the State Aid Fund balance for a number of
years, it provides the City an option for completing the project.
Staff is continuing to research financing alternatives. In addition, Staff is soliciting approval of the bid
costs from Hennepin County. Therefore, it is anticipated that the award of the project will be placed
on the Council agenda for November 8th, 2004.
.
.
CSAH 19 @ SMITHTOWN ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Hennepin County Project No. 9821
S.AP.27-619-18
City of Shorewood Project No. 97-08
S.AP. 216-020-02/ S.AP. 216-101-02/ S.AP. 216-108-01
WSB Project No. 1388-01
Bids Opened Wednesday, October, 20, 2004, 10:00 a.m.
Bid Tabulation Summary
Eureka Construction X X $3,566,322.45
Park Construction X X $3,901,534.86
X X $3,936,121.99
X X $3,998,641.80
Bituminous Roadwa s X X $4,131,833.78
$3,146,789.00
J hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of
e bids eceived on October 20, 2004.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of
the bids recei ed on October 20,2004.
Denotes Corrected Figure
:lp- I H
~ II li~ ~~i.~
}~~~~J
f!3~~~f
jojo ;; :l! I1l '" u.i .
j:U ~!~&~U:l:l
~&o ~t:i!:!wi do
~ I~ ~ ;
III ii
J u
'8
"15 oS U ~ ~
B
.. I;
i j~ ..
ii
... u
.. l!
"15 1199
b oS
U
Ii! ; 8 l!
1 S I I !! !HI
&!i ~.;
a ~ 1;
;:: rZ
~.,; 'a U 9 9!! ~
5 ~ B
,,~ I I~! I
!s
~:i: ..
s;:: II
fI~1; Ii! !
~ i ~ B
;i l! l!
B ~ 'll I~! II
S ~ 1: II
~ ~ J J
.. '" ..
z u.,;"I5ll
0 1199
u ;i B '"
i
j!!! I;
IoiI
,J I
...S
~ ~ J
.... '"
u ~ t; U!!!!
-1 ~
.. u
i Ii!
.. b I II
.....!!i ~
- !;I u &:
~ ~ ~ i
u 0.1 ii !
~:c )199
1-4
CI)
:g
CI)
,..s:::.
o
00 !
..i 1 ~
~ ~ ~
-0 j ! :::- fa
~ !it ~.E'
~m ~!
'-'.....
~~O\ 0
,,1i -...... $
.. ~.. i
i'.. t::c
.. ts.. <(.
.. i i i ~ rzJ
~
~
~
I ;
i !
- - - !
~ ~ ~ 8 8 ; = l! 8 0 ; Ii! Ii! ! ~ ~ ~
.. ~5i 5~~ !! 5 3;l-ii
I! a ~ .. .. a .. l:lit! ~ II 8 l;/;l';;t Iii
I Ii! a 2 l! l! l! Ii! I i!!~ ; ~ i li!r:ll!
! II Il II II i s:; q
:I
;II ~ .. - .. ::! '" ... ... ! D ~ ~ ~ II It ;: l!I !l ~
i
i II
; .. ..
@ g
lili ~ &I &I
a~ I
~ g ~ g i i 8
~
.,
.. b
-1 a ..
~ C7I g t
-Ii U J
~~ ill
u a.. a J:s
~ a f4
! il
l! =
ja! ~
II 9 9 ;
I a ! ~ i i ; D ! ! ! i ~ ! ~ ! ; ! i ~ I ! ; I ~ ~ a ; i ~ a t I ! i ! i ! I ! ; ; I ; ! i i i j Ii i i i ! Is
~ i
lJ f! &I
5 e I
.. b
- ..
fA J. ~
~ ~ II
Ul ~ i
(J ~ g
. ..
'" PI
112 5 ~ ~ ~ s I ~ ~ ! ~ ! R ~ 8 I " . ~ ~ ~ ~.. ""!! .. ~! - e 8 ft ~ II i I = ft I ~ I ~ ~ a ~ H i 5 I e ~ i ~ * 8
~1!Jiiill!!i!li;llillllll;IIII;II;illliiiillllllll!ilili!I!!!I!!!I!
il
e
"'II ~ !!! ~ ~ ! s I ~ ~ . ~ a a ~ iii ~ " :: - ~ ~ := .. - - " ! ~ ;,. . .. !! - " ! ~ ~ ~ ~ II i I := Il i , I 3 ~ ~ i 51 H a ~ ~ it 5 i Bill * ft
~!liii~;~a!!!~:~~=illll;;;I;;~~~I=ii~~~~~II!i~~!lil~~1;1~~I~I~~laa
~ ! 5 = = ~ g t t t t t t t ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 n n n n n n B n t t n B n t 5 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 2 2 t ~ ~ t t t t t
9~~~~2~~~~~~gggga~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~9~eegBB~~~~B~~~~~~~BB~2~BBggggg
~ S ~
I ...... - R ~ !3 J:t1O" ~"''''St; t:4 ::In
~€
II 1 I I ... I! · .ilaa"'H ....
~ a~ <€ ~ g~ I ~a B ~gg 8~ DB ~ j
1 ~~ ~ Sl~ ~ ~ I ~4 i ~[>~[I~ z~..lli~ I!~ II 3~1~ I
,I 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllll!I!1 Illli!illll!llill'lll
1!lllllliili!llliiiiililillill!lilililll!I!IIII!'lilll1111111111
II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I J = 9 ! ~ ! ! ; I ~ 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ ! ; ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ !
zi~~A~~~~~~;:~!~;:;:~;:..;:~!~~;:;:~~;:~;:;:;:A=;:==~;:=....aaaaRaRBB~~~~X~~~22~~
i i .. .. l!I = .. .. .. ..
, . . w . . . . . . _ . . . .. ~ w _ . -. -
~ . a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o Q QQ. .
~!il -.... ~ ~ .. ~ - 0 !l :: ::I II ~ :I :!I l:; :: !!l iii ;: R A ~ 1lI l!I !l := l!l iii II R R ;'II 1lI :II $; III III " 'iI # 0 t 0 if l; . It II ;; l:l II ;l'; :! :It r:; lit II
iii ;; g CI 11
.
.
8l!IIl!i~l!
~2~- I~! Ilj:1~
~ II li~:g~ik ~
!f~~~..i
~333~f
BI- en:l! 'it 'it "' ..; U
IJ! ~"l-l'i- -..------
:;! .. '" '"
... -
i ii J~
J U
"15 ! II
8
..
) P
l!l
u
"15 ] 11
8
" "'1 ~s
.0
~i
1>...
o oJ. ...
~~ en
.. "15 U
5~ B
8
] ~ 1 I~ ~
i'" ..
oJ. ..
;: ti
i 0: "15 11
~ "' ~ 8' ~
;i
B ..~ll I~
S ... S .. !l
~ ~ a ~
8 U 0: "15 ! U
~ ~B'"'
i3
.. ~ 1 I-
II
i ~ II
Uj t )j
~ ~ I~
~... ! S i
~~~i&:
U U ~ ! !U
.. b I~
... lOr
. J. g
"'Ii U g
~: i ~
~ ll", U
dl
.. b I~
..:1 g
... /if u
~ ~ ~
UJ et.: II
U -1 B U
'" III
1-4
CI)
:g
CI)
,..s:::
.0
00 "S
i> &!
ta g
.~! ~
~ i~ ;::-fa
.... -g Me
~ !i ~ - ~ '+:I
~j~~ ~
urnocJO'
'-'.....
}~O\~
Ji f~,~
=i~CI.l ~
1to...IitUrzJ
~ ! lJ l! l! ! l! 8 ~ ~ lJ !
~5~~I:i!~~;}!j
liiJ~!lii
!
Rae a ~ II . ~ ~ 5 ~ i
~ ~ ; ~ a ~ - - ~ 10
'fI I Ii ~
~
@ ~ II ..
!i~~;121;ill
~ ~ " ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ! ~ a
.1 i i
iii Ii!
~!
l:l .. :I
l:l ;; ~
!!! ~
f! iii fI
l~~
., - ~
l~
,
I!!! 5
II ..
i ii
~ ~ l!
~~!
i Ii .~ ,,! 0
i!~2;lg!i;!~
~! !
2i!l~
;~~ll;
l!l ~ ~ :t - ~
- " - - - - a ! ~ " ~ -
~q ~
.. :s ::l ~ ~
Iii i i! " !
.1.1~1~11~~!!~i;I~~i!i;liiillli;iii~llliiiliilil~liiiiillllillllll
; u
!Ij - .. - - - - - - ~ ! a e a ~ II l!I ~ ! 5 ~ 3 - .. - - - - a g ~ . .... - - - :I 8 i :I I ~ ~ ; ~ a ~ - - ~ :s ::l ~ . ~ I ft I ~ i! DR ft
JI;lllllaaaGi21;;;1111;lllllall~ai;ll;aIDa;III;~II;BI;l;a~II~~;;
Ii!: II II g it g g A ~ g tI i .
~ n n n n n n n n ~ ~ ~ t t t t ~ ~ t t t ~ ~ n n n n n t t 5 n n n n 5 n t ~ t ~ ~ ~ t t ~ t t 5 n n 5 n ~ t ~ t t t t ~ ~ ~ n
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!!~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~!!~!!~~~~~~!Br!!!grr~
...
. I
~
s .. = :I
~ ~ Ill.
I
I ,t, I n .oi'I'~~ g=j I.
I > .. II ,dl .. ~ ~ ,..~ >;1 B B m ~ ~ L1 l:i ~ ~ ;l'; ill l'! III II i III I ' II
~ ~ ~ ~ II II tl tl II tl II II II II II II a li li .. ~ :i m ~ II j B eRR R R HI i
~ .~ ~ ~ .......... II Ii1 ~ ~ " m g ~ i!i ~ i!i ~ I ~ a M ~ a a
~~i1~ IlilmIIIIII19~~~~Blll~ ~~ ~~~a !l e eRBBgg. ....~ II! EE!
! ! ! ! i I ; i i I I I I ; I I I ! i I I ! I I I I i I . I i l ! I I I I i Ie. e II! i i ! ~ i i i I I I i
i1 ~ ~ i1 i i i i ~ i1 ~ i1 m m m ~ i1 i m m m ! I~ ~ ~ ~ I I ! ~ ~ ! ~ ! i ~ ~ I I I I~ ! I I Ii! I ~ I I~ i IR I II ~ I I I ~ ~ g ~
l.!l.!l.!l.!~~~~!i!l.!l.!l.!l.!l.!l.!:u:u:nn ~~~:!~&l~;!~~B81~~~2 i~~~la~~ :I K ~K~B
!dddl~~~lh!l!d~idllkidddl~ 88..8!:"S~fo!:~~U~fo!llr uesgsssg tI .. IH,Io.
al i i i i ; ; ; ; i ; ; i i ; ; ; ; i ; ; ; i II1111 ; ; ; ; ; IIII11111111 ; II ; ; IIII ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - .. .. .. - ..
m .................;!F;1le ........~tlO......~l!iltjllO....... ...;I!!Ftt'"tlO;tF::t<o ;t
~~ a II !a I III I! ~ l'! l'! ~ l(! ~ I:: ~ Il! II = a a jl; l\1 I I; = III $: ;;: III R ;,; z: ill !;; I: It ! !il! !i! ~ !! ! ~ ! ! !l S S a == :! l!! !i :! !! !! 3 !I B t! a l! !:i
.
.
!I !~;~~lls
t:;--"'-S
~ ~- !!~;;;f-
" 1i'.B S fIJ u.i u.i . IE
fIJ~~'it"::!U
" II! "'= .. - ~
~6 ~ I;i !3 wi
i a I~
~ u
~ !
'IS U
8
I Is
0 il
... U
fIJ ]
~
0 II
8
! ~ 1 Is
a ~ IS
- ...
t''' co
ll'; 'IS U
o.l 8
u<<l
~ ~ 1 I~
! - ~
i j 0
- I>
.. co
5'; 'IS U
~ a~ 8
z
B ~ 1 .. Is
· it
S ...~ IS II
3 - ... ~
z u ~ ; !
0 II
u ~ B' fIJ
~
~ I~
. ~ I
- ~ ..
~~ ~ II
. b I
· - ! g i ~
- g u
~~ .;se.
u ~ ~ J!U
t-l
CI)
~
]
o
00 "S
i>' ill
~' g
.;]! ~
E ~ ~
~ i~ ~fii
.... "'I Me
~ !i ~~..:::
~ ...p.. ~
ornC:cj&
.............
i!' 0
'. ~ ~ ~ .B
}~ t~ .1
mlm0~
.. b I
~~5J ~
~l; i:l
~.. II !
~ dl fIJ
.. b
- a
G\ cIt g
-lil u
~ ~ t
u ~ :I
~ i
~
~
:l
oil
!;i~ ;a'~2
Ii!
a
::!:l:H :OiSi9 ~
II
~
~ I ! i
! iii II
&: i !
~
II ; 8 ~ 8
~ 5! ~
..
9 ~ .. ~ !I
~ :q ~ ~ II; Ii! 1\ ; 1\ II 8 !!
~ ~ II i ~ a !l a!!!
! .. e ~ ;q I'l 5 -
i .. - H ... -
~
;!!;;
i I;
Ii!
II
;
iUS
1
,
II
a
!
~
~
a
5
a
~
:111'1 ~ ~ ;
~ ~ 3
i;!~;113!;~
~
;
II
l
;
:l :l :! II ! g ~ ~ S :l :l
~
a
!!
:!Il_l~! 1i!~~D
::I~ ~3!L:
I
D~i~a
i ; ~
~ ~ ~! = 6 6 ~
!U = s ~
~ a ~
~
Ii!
~
;:;
;J~
I~
IS ; i ! a
~
:!: ::3 fl'I
J
II ! ~ 8 Ii! 8 8 ~ 8
!lo:~!!ilB!Li
II Ii! II 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 II! ~
a~!!g!l!!a i!l~!~ II
!!;I;J~~la!~
u-~!..... :l:l"!!"3l1!!!; ,,-"!~!!!~~!ii'I81151~ - ..g-"!Il!ll!ll!ll-~S
~!iill!l!ill~ll~illlll!~IJlii!!;illlll!I!liiri!lll;;lilllil1!1111
!U .. ~ ! .. :!I :!I 1'1 a ! ~ @ i ~ ~ ~ .. !! .. ~ lI! !l ~ ~ .. .. !I .. ! ~ !!! i ~ B , 8 !! ~ - - - = ::l Ol :! iii !! . ~ .. I ~ .. !I II II II I - l S Cl i R
..;~~;~I;=I~~:~116~11~=a~~~~~:~~aa~=~a~~I;IBI;lal~13;aalll~;3B;~9
f;;i! ~.: ail.: If ':!:ltl...: "~i!
~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EEl ~ I I I Ii! I ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ g ; g ~ 9 g ~ ~
I
R l:l l:l R R R R A 51 ~ . . . . . . . .. A R R
::l l!l
::l
, 0 ~ ~ ~ ~<
. PI! ;;,~Ii I i Iii i II , I I
Iii I~.I 1!!IIIII! 11..II!!!!l!!II!!!!! ~~I!lli; ~ iii II Ii
. I I I ! i i ! I ! I i I i I I I ; I I I I I i I I I i II ! I Ii! ; ! I II I I I ; I ; I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i I
sl ;,~ I; ~; ~;;;; ~ i I I;;; I I; ; ~ I I I I I I I I I II I Iii i I; ~ ~;; a ~;;; I I i I; ;; I I;; I I
I i-..~!!!!!!!!!!!! II I 1.=~~.ill~=I= ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~
~!i! !!l!l l!I 6 !l B i'!i a 1IJ a !!I !l ! :i g g ! !! ! S ! ! !! $ g !l :i !!l !!l $ ! ! ! !!l !! !!! ! !!! ! S !!l ! ! = E S ! E E E E !! ! ! g !! ! !! ! ~ ! !! !l
.
.
~
...
.
.
.
Preliminary Schedule I
. ,.
InB Pro),," CSAIII9, SmItblown Road, CC Rood D.'1an by. RCH
ProJ,ct Local"'''' ShoIlWllOd. MN eMend by. DWS, CTR
InB Pro)'" No: 01388.01 D.. 1ll12012OD4
CSAH 19 (C.P.9821)
Estimate of Quantity and Cost
EUREKA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Storm Sewer
CSAH 19 CSAH19 CSAH19 CSAHll1 CSAHll1 SmlllIloW1l Road COqUIry Club Road CIQ' of Sborewood CIQ' of Tonka BIl' 30.4 % 9.A.!'. 27-619-18
s.A.P.21-619-18 s.A.P.21-619-18 C.P. 9821 S.A.P.216-020-02 s.A.P.216-020-02 s.A.P.216-101-02 5.A.P.216-108-01 37.8 % S.A.!'. 216-021J.OZ
HelInepln COnDlJ HOlInepln CounlJ R.LP.P. Fundi CIQ' of Sborewood CllJ of Sborewood CIQ' ofSborewood CllJ of Sborewuod Lo<ll Cost Lo<ll Cost 12.1 %S.A.!'.216-101-02
SlreelscaplnC HelIn.pIn eonulJ Slroelscaplnl 5.11% S.A.!'. 216-108-01
LINE SHEBT Pro eel ToW Lo<llll'undl 13.9% TODkaBay
NO - UlIIl = .- - -..... -= - -= - '.;:;::' - = -..... -- - :.: - = -.. = - -..... -
No. - lloIoriallon N_ Ud - C'" - C'" CoIl CoIl Ootl eoll ...- CoIl Colt eo.. ColI - COlI
191 90-" 151UlM I4llLCIIMA'IEIIWo TYPI! 6. SPllCIAL '" SQ'YIl s.u.oo 31 1.71G.oo u.n S7Q.U 25.33 1,I3U.I
IlI2 1 151.1.6ll1 DID NIXIIlIU! 1.10 POUND 1S.00 .12 2llll.oo oft 2llll.oo
m 1 1S7.SAO' DID MDmlltI!2.I0 POtlND S4.oo 91 364.00 91 3K00
190 1 1575.. SEIlD MDmIU:l1O POtlND l2.I.OO :u .12.1.00 21 .12.1.00
W 1 151.1.6111 IIEI!ll MDmlIlII3.IO POtlND S.I.oo 112 5OIl.GO 112 .IfIl.oo
1116 1 25'1.1..10.1 SDIlDDIOTYPIl SALTIUlSISTANT SQYD SUO 1.1010 3,7,700.00 1_ 2d,tJO.00 1040 2,GOO.oo .714 4,21l.oo LS46 3,14.!.oo
19'1 1 151.1..111 MllLCBMATIlRIAL TYPI!3 TON S2OO.oo 3.06 T.l2.GO 3M T.l2.GO
111 7 151.1..132 c:mo.maa.u.Pl!aT ANAL'ISIS 11.14 POtlND 10.<0 m 2.12.10 632 2.12.10
IlllI 1 1S'7.1..132 COMMl!ll.CLU.Pl!aT ANAL'ISIS 22<1.10 POIlND IlUO 101 11.1..111 W l'1!"sO
200 1 151.1.6ll.1 EP.OSION CONnlDL Ilt.AN1CIIT CA1EOOII.Y3 SQYD U.lO - "I11I.1II on ',191.1G
201 1 151.1.dll.I DR ANCIIOaDlO ACItI Sl3.l.00 1.113 24'7'" 1.0 24'/.115
202 25lO.6III I1lTEIl.1NPAVEMllNT w.uDlClS UNPT $1.1.1 100 2,4'1.1.00 llOO 2,41.1.00
2D:J 2.111..1111 BBMOVABUlP1ll!l'_ PLAS'nl: MIo1UCINO UNPT lD.!/.1 2!00 2,31.1.00 2!00 2,3'1.1.00
$ 3,561,322.0 $ 2,llI7,301.10 $11..,10..111 $ 57..,..22 $ 3:11.141.20 $ 6.I,9I1.:l3 $ 204,1'IUO $ !19,2113O $ ",910.00 $ <6,1'1LOO $ .IlI:l,IlO.oo
NO'I1lS: .
I) TO BEllSJ1) AIlIllllBCD!D BY THE ENOINl!IlIl.
2jsoj,2lI
3) TO B8 lJSI!l) POll11!MPQ1Wl.Y CONS'IROcnoN TO MAINTAIN TRAFFIC AND ACCBSSESS. TO BE tlSllD All DI1lEC'I'BIl BY THE BNOlNEEI\.
4) TO lIE lJSII) FOll 'I1lBIl PIlO'mcnoN.
.I) QtIAN'ITIY FOllEXCAVAlION OP PO'I1lImA1. CONT_TBD SOn.S.
0) POND llXCAVAlION.
'/) S1lBSUIU'ACBDI.AIN ALONG sotmI SIDB OF SM1TH1'OWN1lOAJ).
I) WA'IlD\MAIIIwmDN CItY OF TONKABAY IS I.... cotlN'IY COST.
0) mur C1LWJlI!R. Sl!ZmrrAIL ON SBI!l!:T2A.
10) POND 0lI'Itll!' S1C1MMIlIl., _ DB1'A1L ON SIIIlET 2A.
II) TWO CAlITlNlJS ABl! FOll SANtrA1Y SBWElL
12) 4" IRSC POll Fl1I'llU CItY lJSE.
13) Dla.tIDBS IlBIolOVAI. OF CASTIIIG ASSDalI.Y.
14) QlIAN'M'YlNCWDES 11!MPQ1Wl.Y CONS'tlWC11OII.
1.1) F AIIN'1'B1lNAl.CIIlMNEY SEAl. ON AU.IANtTAIlY SEWEll MANllOUlS.
U):l7.1 TONI OF TDIPOIWI.Y PAVDmIT POll 'm.U'FIC B1/1'ASS.
l'/):IIl TONS OFTEMPOllAIlYPAVDmITPOll 'm.U'FIC B1/1'ASS.
11) INCWDBS 1110 CU YDS OF TEMPOllAIlY AOO1Ull>Aft
1t) INSTAU. SA1.VAlIBDMODlJ1,A1 BI.OCE RETAlNlNGWAU.
2D) QlIAN'M'Y INCI.llIIIlS B!1'tlIomlOOll OVDLAY ON CONC1lE'11lIN pA1lJQNG I.OT ARIA IN NIl C01lNJ!Il OF CSAB 19 tmmlSl!C1ION.
21) FA1l1lJC TO BE PlACID 0NDllIl SI11lC'1' GIlANtII.A1ll101lll0W ON S>m1lTOWN 1lD, COllN'11Y a.llII 1lOADo SBOIlIIWOOD l.ANIl, AND TBB MAIN'mlANc! DJUYE.
22) TO BE llSED FOll ST01tI4 SEWI!Il CONS'1'I.llC1tC
22) TO BE tlSllDPOIl. PlIUWlBNTRETAINING WAU.No. 4 '" 5
J4)1IIll1I EAlU.Y C01fCUIESBAU.BIlll'l1l.lZBD
25)TODPL\CZ WOOD WAU.AD1ACI!H1'TO RETAINIIlO WAU. NO.:I.
2D) TO llSED ATnm1ll:SCNmOll OF TBB_FOll TIXP01lA1Y BIlOSION CON'11l.OL
2'1) COOllTYTOPA11IC11'A'IE IN 1/11 OF IlAII.DIOCOST.
21) PBDllS'l'IIANaASlPS SBAU. _ TBB'I1lllNCATBD DOIoGl
2D) SCIIBDOI.Z 10 FYC.
30) 'D\ANSPI.ANl'1IU!1!S ATPmI! STATIDN_
:11) CltYSTUEl'_' .
:11) IlBNlII!PIN COOllTYTO PAIl11CIPAm UP TO 1"- OF CONSTIlI/C1ION COST POll 'I1lBIlIU!Pt.ACBImlT
22) BBJlNllPIII CODNTYTO PAIl11ClPAm 1l1' TO _OF l.ANDSCAP1I COSTS PO>>.IANDSCAPB rIllMS FUNIlBD USING LU.1'.1'lJNDS
34) AlICDlBGA'IZ BACEPllL TO BE tllll!D ATTBB IlISCIII1JOIl OF TBB BllOINBBILFOllIlACKP1U. on WAU.FOcmN<lS.
BASIS FOR OUA.NT1TlES
lJNl1' WBJCHn' OF IIrI'Il>GINOOS MIX (SUPBII. PAVBI
lJNl1' Wl!lllBT OF IlI1'tJMIINOOS MIX (NOlI stlI'1!ll. PA VB)
AlI<DECIA1I! llASIl CI.ASS 5
112 LBSISYI1N
110 UlSlSYIIN
1., 1.BSISY1IN
TACK COAT
. MIW!D SllUACI
. BE1WBBNNF.W l.A.YBU
0.0'1 GIIIJSY
0.115 OA1JSY
TllIlI' BSTABLIS1lMBNT
. SBBDMDmlU 1.10
. SBBD MIX1'llU 2.ID
. SBIlDMDmlU3UI
. DID 1IDCI1lllE3.IO
4D LBSIAClU!
'10 UlSIACIUI
12 I.BSIACItI
14..1 UISIACItI
. -.cllWoTllBlAL. TY1'I!3
. COMYBaCIAI.PD.TlUZI1l.I..14
. COMYBaCIAI. Pl!aTlllZEP. -Do5-1O
2 TONIACU
1.10 UISIACU
"'1SSIAC1U!