071006 CC WS AgP
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDAY, JULY 10,2006
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
A. Roll Call
Mayor Love _
Lizee
Turgeon _
Callies
Wellens
B. Review Agenda
2. BUDGET PHILOSOPHY (Att. - Administrator's memorandum)
3. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF PRIVATE USE OF SLMPD FIRING RANGE (Att.-
Staff memoranda)
4. OTHER
5. ADJOURN
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years. 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council cb
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator .
July 6, 2006
Preliminary Discussion on 2007 Budget (July 10 Work Session Item)
Staff is assembling the 2007 proposed budget. It is anticipated that Council will have thorough
review of the budget during August. At the September 11 Council meeting, the proposed budget
would be accepted and the not-to-exceed tax levy would be declared.
The purpose of the discussion at this work session is for Council to state its preferences, expectations,
areas of special interest, etc., and for staff to share with Council some items of importance in the
radar screen for next year and following years. This discussion will be extremely useful and provide
efficient use of staff time in drafting the proposed budget.
Staff would like to point out some things very preliminarily that will or could affect increases to the
$3,678,600 levy for 2006.
. There are no levy limits in place for 2007.
. The Council has been aggressively restoring the levels of funding into various capital funds.
More funds will continue to be accumulated. For 2007, Council may wish to consider the
transfer of monies from the balance in the General Fund than to rely solely on taxes to provide
this funding.
. The condition of the City's roadways continues to deteriorate in general. Staff is will be
investigating techniques that would provide greater value for the funds expended. Regardless,
the need to increase the year-to-year level of funding for roadway improvements will continue.
. Costs for SLMPD in 2006 are $716,000, and with the new cost allocation, would have been
$778,000. Using this as a base, and if SLMPD were to increase 4%, Shorewood's cost would
be approximately $810,000. Consequently, overall police costs would increase around
$95,000, or a 2.6% increase to the 2006 tax levy.
. Shorewood's payment to EFD would go up approximately $32,000, or about 0.9% over the
2006 tax levy.
. Salary and benefit adjustments are likely to be in the range of $100,000 over 2006, or a 2.6%
Increase.
. Assuming that the City Hall building will continue to be occupied in its present state for a few
more years, some additional expenditure will be necessary on the building and for conditions
in the basement.
. Staff would like to place a computer kiosk for visitors to City Hall to use to access records and
other government agencies. Ue network server is also due for replacement in 2007.
'.oJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:#;(
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Year 2007 Budget Schedule
Date Description
07/05/06 Budget worksheets distributed to staff and department heads.
07/10/06 Work-session: budget philosophy discussion (Council and Staff)
07/12/06 Completed budget worksheets due back to Finance from staff.
08/07/06 Work-session: General Fund Operating Budget draft (Council and Staff)
08/21/06 Work-session: Additional General Fund session, if needed (Council and Staff)
09/11/06 Regular Council meeting. Council adopts 2007 proposed budget and levy.
09/15/06 Proposed budget and levy must be adopted and certified to County Auditor
by this date. State form Payable 2007 PT Form 280also to be submitted.
10/23/06 Enterprise fund budget work-session (Council and staff)
11/20-11/24 Counties to mail Notice of Proposed Property Tax by this date.
11/29/06
Budget hearing advertisement published in the official newspaper.
12/04/06
City initial budget truth-in-taxation hearing.
12/11/06
If required, the continuation truth-in-taxation hearing to be held on this date.
12/11/06
Regular Council meeting. Final 2007 budgets and levy to be adopted.
12/29/06
Final levy and budgets must be certified to the County Auditor by this date.
State forms Payable 2007 Property Tax Levy Report and PT Form TNT2007
also due.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us' cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years. 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council ~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
July 6, 2006
Use of Firearms Range in SLMPD Building (Work Session Item)
At its June 12 meeting, Council heard a request from a resident to be able to conduct firearms safety
training at the range in the South Lake Minnetonka Police Station. Council wished to have historical
information assembled regarding the proposed or intended uses ofthe firearms range, and
information regarding any zoning restrictions that may apply. After review at a work session,
Council would have further discussion about whether it should request the SLMPD Coordinating
Committee to consider the resident's request.
Chief Litsey has searched through the Department's files regarding the proposal for the firearms
range as well as action by the Coordinating Committee. The following reports are attached:
1) Excerpt of space analysis for police station, January 2001
2) Excerpt of needs assessment for police, February 26, 2001
3) Information Bulletin regarding indoor firearms range, May 2002
4) Excerpt of minutes ofSLMPD Coordinating Committee meeting, February 24, 2004 (Item D,
Use ofIndoor Firearms Range), including agenda report dated February 20, 2004
. Consensus of Committee was to have further information before making a
policy decision on opening the range for non-law enforcement use.
5) Excerpt of minutes ofSLMPD Coordinating Committee meeting, April 28, 2004 (Item D, Use
of Indoor Firearms Range), including agenda report dated April 28, 2004
. Committee expressed concerns about opening range for public use; agreed
that law enforcement must have priority for use.
. Survey of some other police departments' ranges and use policies indicated
that public use generally was not permitted; some had allowed public use but
discontinued it for various reasons.
Director of Planning Brad Nielsen has also prepared a brief memorandum (attached) describing the
current zoning regulations that apply to the use of the firearms range in the police station, and
amendments that would need to be considered if private use of the range were to be permitted.
~~
'.oJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:tF3
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Celebrating 50 Years. 1956 - 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
6 July 2006
RE:
Zoning Issues - Police Firing Range
FILE NO.
405 (Pub. Safety Facility)
The City has received a request to allow the SLMPD firing range to be used for training
associated with concealed carry permits issued by the Police Department. Council will be
discussing this matter at its meeting on 10 July and questioned what, if any, concerns there
may be relative to zoning. This is to briefly address those concerns.
First, it was clearly anticipated when the conditional use permit was being considered that the
range would be used by law enforcement personnel from our own police department, and
quite possibly by other law enforcement agencies. Public use of a commercial nature (e.g. a
public firing range) was not discussed and would not be allowed in the residential zoning
district in which the property is located.
The use that has been requested appears to fall somewhere between the two uses referenced
above. The concealed carry program, like firearms safety programs required by the
Department of Natural Resources, are subject to certification by the State. If the Police
Coordinating Committee and the City Council were agreeable to this type of use, it could be
distinguished from the purely commercial use referenced above. Trainers would contract
with the SLMPD for use of the range. In any event, the current conditional use permit under
which the facility was approved would need to be revisited.
If you have questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior to
Monday night's meeting.
Cc: Craig Dawson Tim Keane
4'"~
l1: t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
..10'
The groundbreaking for our current police station took place in July of 1988. It was built
for a cost of $450,000 and contains 5,800 square feet of space with a full basement. The
building is a leaselpurchase agreement with the City of Excelsior at an annual cost of
$38,400. It will be fully paid off in February of2013.
The following is not intended to be an in-depth analysis of our current facility, but rather,
to give a general idea of some of the improvements that should be considered if a new
police station is built as part of a multi-use building with the fire department.
II
The construction quality was intended more for an office type building rather than
the rigors of a police station. There is no emergency backup power to keep the
building operational during electrical outages.
Cramped area without an adjacent room to meet with people in a casual setting.
There are no public rest rooms, so for security reasons people must be escorted
through the entire building in order to use the bathroom facilities in the locker
rooms. It is also uncomfortable for staff to use the showers in the locker rooms
not knowing who might walk in.
Unable to accommodate large size groups for meetings, training, etc. Also doubles
PAGE 4 - ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT POLICE STATION
.,
Ideally, it would be advantageous to have an indoor fIrearms range onsite for
training purposes. At the present time, the range is a shared outdoor facility
located at the Delano Gun Club. This is not only a considerable distance away,
but there are also scheduling and weather conflicts. Having an onsite range would
be a real plus in terms of the present drawbacks and would also allow for more
individual instruction during shift time.
Prepared by Chief Bryan Litsey - February 26, 2001
The preferred design would be a campus setting with police and fire having separate buildings
with a shared common area. The complex should be constructed as a high use commercial grade
structure with special consideration given to security, especially in the police area. It should be
able to accommodate current technology and have an independent power source in the form of an
electrical generator. Costs should include furnishing the building and incorporating state-of-the-
art technology.
Main entrance with a receptionist area for both police and fire. It should be a spacious and
comfortable setting with public restrooms. There should be a television screen to display public
information on meetings, etc.
Large enough room to accommodate large meetings and training exercises with dividers to
separate the area into smaller rooms. The room should be equipped with the latest technology for
making presentations.
Provide a common area for policelfire personnel to take a break with tables, well equipped
kitchen, vending machines, etc.
Work out room for police and fire personnel along with small locker rooms with shower facilities.
Both indoor and outdoor kennel area to secure the canine (K-9) when not with the officer.
Separate indoor kennels for keeping animals on a short-term basis.
Secure room for storing firearms, ammunition and an area for loading/unloading and cleaning
weapons. Indoor firearms range with adjacent office for range officers.
JOINT
BUILDING PROJECT
INFORMA TIONAL BULLETIN
One of the police needs that was identified early on in the process for a new public safety
facility was an indoor firearms range. It has been well received through the evolution of
this project, which has been under intense scrutiny at multiple levels. I have composed
this document, however, as a source of public information on the many benefits derived
from including an indoor firearms range as part of the project.
There first needs to be a common understanding of the responsibility that
goes with carrying a firearm as a law enforcement officer. Minnesota Statute 609.066
defines when officers may use deadly force to protect themselves or another from
apparent death or great bodily harm. The Minnesota Peace Officers Standards and
Training Board (POST), as mandated by state law, requires officers to receive ongoing
use of force instruction and to have a demonstrated proficiency in the use of the firearms
authorized by the agency. I have attached to this document some relevant information
from the POST Board pertaining to this subject. In our organization, this skills
requirement means officers must be proficient in the use of a handgun, shotgun and rifle.
Handgun qualifications are generally done on a quarterly basis under simulated real life
conditions with shotgun and rifle qualifications incorporated as part of this training
and/or on their own. Our current firearms training is designed to exceed POST
standards.
Maintaining all the aforementioned instructional and skills requirements is a considerable
investment of resources for a law enforcement agency, yet the enormity of importance
cannot be overstated in terms of officer safety and protecting the public from those who
wish to do harm to others. As an officer, you hope to go through your entire career
without ever having to use a firearm outside of training. There is no guarantee of this
happening, however, and if such an event unfolds an officer needs to act instinctively
and with a great deal of accuracy. Under stressful conditions this can be difficult at best
and research shows the level of training received by the officer beforehand can have a
significant impact on the outcome.
With the aforementioned thoughts in mind, I would like to further expound on some of
the things that need to be taken into account when evaluating our proposal for an indoor
firearms range as part of the new police-fire facility. Our society empowers the police to
use reasonable force to carry out their duties and responsibilities. With this delegation of
authority comes a duty on the part of the employing law enforcement agency to make
sure proper policies and procedures are in place along with adequate training and
supervision. Nowhere is this duty more paramount than when it comes to firearms
training. Neglecting this responsibility puts the officer and the general public at greater
risk and increases the liability exposure to the organization. Another significant
consideration is the post traumatic effect to an officer involved in a shooting. One of the
critical components in managing this risk is having qualified instructors on staff in
conjunction with a good training facility that is accessible and available to the officers on
a regular basis. We currently have on staff a seasoned use of force/firearms instructor
and another officer who is going through extensive training to reach this level. This
gives us two such instructors on staff to coordinate and instruct the many hours of
ongoing firearms training officers must receive so they make good decisions and achieve
the desired skill level.
Our police department is currently a member of the Southwest Firearms Training
Association along with the Deephaven Police Department, Medina Police Department
and West Hennepin Public Safety Department. I have been the treasurer for this
association for the past several years. Our portion of the association dues and fees to use
the Delano Gun Club this year total approximately $800, not including the cost of having
qualified instructors on site, ammunition, etc. The Delano Gun Club is an outdoor
facility utilized by members other than law enforcement officers. It is about a 30 minute
drive from our police station in Excelsior, which adds an additional hour to the time
officers are out of the community and unavailable for calls while qualifying at the range.
This also translates into an increased expense for those officers qualifying at the range
when off-duty. In 2001, the amount of overtime paid to officers for range qualifications
was more than $1,000. The current arrangement is not conducive to using the range for
additional instruction and/or practice at times other than when qualifying due to the
distance, cost, advanced set up requirements and having to share the facility with other
non law enforcement users. The range equipment has to be stored off-site in a trailer and
takes a considerable amount of time to set up. Another noteworthy factor that needs
to be taken into consideration is that as the population increases in the metropolitan
area there is increasing pressure on outdoor gun clubs to either close or [nove
further out. This brings into question both the long-term availability and practicality of
our current arrangement.
In spite of all the aforementioned limitations, we currently have very few alternatives for
this essential training. Several years ago, our police department used the outdoor
firearms range maintained by the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office in Golden Valley.
This firearms range was closed down, however, and the Hennepin County Sheriff's
Office teamed up with the City of Maple Grove to construct a new shared indoor
firearms range. The Maple Grove facility is available to other law enforcement agencies
on a limited basis, although there are times when demand exceeds what they can
accommodate. There is no guarantee, therefore, that our organization would be able to
use this facility for firearms training at a later date if the Delano Gun Club were no
longer an option. Like the Delano Gun Club, distance is a factor with the Maple Grove
facility being about a 30 minute drive from our police station in Excelsior. The facility in
Maple Grove would also be more costly to use at a flat rate of$150 per hour. Presently,
the amount of time needed for all our officers to complete quarterly range qualifications
can be as much as 10 hours. This would be quite costly if we were to reserve the same
amount of time at the Maple Grove facility. In addition, we would still need to provide
our own range instructors, ammunition, etc. thus adding even further to the cost.
In the preceding text, I have provided some insight into the awesome responsibility that
police officers assume when carrying a firearm and how that equates to the need for a
top-notch training facility. I would now like to focus entirely on the proposed indoor
firearms range as part of the new police-frre facility. Although there is enough land on
this site to install an outdoor firearms range, this would obviously not be feasible due to
zoning regulations and the fact that it is adjacent to a residential neighborhood. The
design of the proposed public safety facility, however, does allow for an indoor frrearms
range to be installed underground. In addition to noise considerations, there are many
advantages to such an arrangement. The range will be out of the public eye in a secured
and controlled environment. It will likely be available around the clock (24-7), which
means officers can practice and/or receive additional instruction while on-duty regardless
of their shift. This has several benefits in that overtime costs are reduced, yet officers
have a much greater opportunity to become more proficient in their use of firearms and
are able to receive individual instruction at times other than when qualifying. This
significantly increases the probability that the instinctive reactions of an officer in a real
life situation will be the appropriate response. The frrearms training our officers receive
are based on real life scenarios and a properly designed and equipped indoor range
enhances the ability of the range instructor to increase the realism of the training through
simulated environmental or artificial conditions. These can range from variations in light
and temperature to flashing lights and noise. The range is also useful when it comes to
practicing with the non-lethal Advanced Taser either alone or in conjunction with
firearms training. As a secondary use, the range can become an underground shelter
which complements having the emergency operations center in the same facility.
One of the primary objectives of this police-fire building project has been to design
facilities that will meet the needs of both organizations for decades to come. It is prudent
planning, therefore, to include an indoor firearms range in order to better facilitate one of
the most essential of all police training requirements. Doing so as part of the new
construction is much more viable given the unique specifications for a firearms range and
the difficultly in trying to add one later. For example, because the proposed firearms
range will be underneath the police station, the excavation needs to be done at the time of
the project. There is the option of roughing in the space and equipping the range at a
later date, but this would be a significant impact on the operating budget. I have
provided a breakdown of these costs as provided by the architect for comparison
purposes. It is important to note, however, that defraying costs to the operating budget
was supposed to be avoided when practical pursuant to the amendment that was
approved by all four member cities.
There have been discussions about making the firearms range available to other law
enforcement agencies to help defray some of the operating costs. This is a distinct
possibility, given my conversations with fellow police chiefs in the Lake Minnetonka
area who have indicated an interest in such a locally based facility for many of the same
reasons I have already expressed. I am exploring several options on how this
arrangement would work, ranging from membership fees based on number of officers to
a flat hourly rate. I do not feel, however, that the decision to move forward with the
firearms range should be dependent on the outcome of these discussions. Either way, the
firearms range is very much needed and would be a valuable asset with or without the
participation of other law enforcement agencies.
In my opinion, not including an indoor firearms range into this project would be a missed
opportunity with long-term ramifications. If we are truly building for today witb a
vision for tomorrow then having a firearms range as part of this project is a necessity
not just a want.
Page 5 of 21
February 24, 2004
Meeting Minutes - SLMPD Coordinating Committee
radios so that each officer can have one assigned to them, base stations
for the new police station and some accessories. Mayor Keller inquired if
there was also something in the works for the cities to be part of the 800
MHz radio system. Chief Litsey turned to Deputy Chief Nieling, who said
he has been working with Hennepin County to develop a fleet map for
programming radios for the cities. He further stated that right now a
portable radio obtained through the grant has been earmarked for one of
the city crews to try out. Chief Litsey expounded on this by saying this test
project will be with Shorewood Public Works since they are right next door
and Larry Brown (Public Works Director) is active in emergency
preparedness. He said once this is completed, a recommendation will be
made to all four cities which will have some financial implications. Chief
Litsey stressed the importance from an emergency management
standpoint of eventually having all the public works crews on the 800 MHz
system in order to communicate with police and fire.
C. SLMPD Insurance Matters
Chief Litsey first brought up the rather complicated process for securing
insurance on the new public safety building. He indicated that when all
was said and done it was the Shorewood EDA that needed to be named
on the policy with the cost being split between police and fire. He stated
the good news is that the annual insurance premium is under the original
estimate with the police portion being slightly less than $4,500. He stated
that the type of construction along with the fire suppression systems made
it a very low cost building to insure. Mayor Nagel clarified that the overall
cost to insure the building was approximately $9,000 of which police were
responsible for half. Chief Litsey said it was through the process of
insuring the building that he came in contact with the insurance agent
utilized by the City of Shorewood, who offers a very reasonable five
percent commission. Chief Litsey indicated that the agent used by the
department has a six percent commission and has been asking for more.
He indicated this led to his interviewing and securing the services of the
agent used by Shorewood (Ken Jarcho Agency) since it matched up nicely
with the building insurance and was a lower commission. He noted that all
the insurance is through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust,
but that they require an agent to manage the account. There was some
additional dialogue about the building insurance before moving on to the
next item.
D.
Use of Indoor Firearms Range
(
Chief Litsey noted that the firearms range was up and running and that the
Minnetrista Police Department was the first outside agency to use the
Page 6 of 21
February 24, 2004
Meeting Minutes - SLMPD Coordinating Committee
facility to qualify one of their new officers. He indicated that efforts have
been underway as promised to market the range to other law enforcement
agencies. He stated Sergeant Dan Rusch has been delegated much of
this responsibility as the range coordinator for the department. Chief
Litsey referenced the information he had provided to the Coordinating
Committee having to do with the marketing of the firearms range to other
law enforcement agencies along with the policies and procedures. He
further stated that an indemnification form was being developed and
would be sent to the department attorney for his review. Chief Litsey
stated the initial rental fee has been set at $125 per hour, but is subject to
adjustment once actual range operational costs are better known. He said
these expenses will be tracked and a designed account for this purpose
will likely be set up in the future. There were some questions from
Coordinating Committee members about the marketing of the range for
law enforcement use and how the hourly rate was derived. The discussion
then focused on utilization of the firearms range for non-law enforcement
purposes. Chief Litsey indicated he was looking for direction from
members of the Coordinating Committee on what the criteria and
threshold should be for expanding the use of the firearms range beyond
law enforcement use. He noted that his staff was not comfortable having
open range time where just anyone could use the facility. Mayor Johnson
inquired if additional insurance was needed for civilian use. Chief Litsey
stated in talking to the insurance agent no additional coverage was
apparently needed, but it would be good to verify this directly with the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust before moving ahead. Mayor
Johnson also inquired what other facilities allow for when it came to using
their ranges for non police use. Chief Litsey indicated that the policies and
procedures adopted by the department were similar to those of several
other law enforcement agencies that operate firearm ranges. He thought
that the Maple Grove facility was considering the use of its range for
conceal/carry courses as a revenue source, but needed to do some more
checking to be certain. Mayors Keller and Love felt it was important that if
limited public use was allowed it should be with bona fide organizations
that can take responsibility for those individuals using the range. Chief
Litsey commented that one of the standing requests that the department
has right now is from an individual instructing concealed/carry courses
over at the Senior Center who wants to rent the range to qualify his
students. Mayor Nagel thought it was important to establish first how
much range time was needed for law enforcement use since that has a
bearing on how much open time was left for other uses. Chief Litsey
agreed saying law enforcement use needed to take priority. Mayor Nagel
also inquired if there should be some sort of background check on people
using the range that could be incorporated into the fee. Upon further
discussion, it was the consensus of the Coordinating Committee that
Page 7 of 21
February 24, 2004
Meeting Minutes - SLMPD Coordinating Committee
further information was needed before entering into a policy decision on
opening the range for non law enforcement use. Chief Litsey said he
would take what was talked about back to the staff level and report back to
the Coordinating Committee at a later time.
E. Emergency Preparedness - Time SensiUve Items
(1) Cities Adopting Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Chief Litsey explained what was involved for each city to adopt by
resolution the Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan as noted in
his memorandum and sample resolution. He stressed the tight time
line to adopt the resolution and asked that each member city
address it at their first council meeting in March. Chief Litsey
further asked that all the resolutions be sent to him no later than
March 15, 2004 so he could forward them to Hennepin County
Emergency Preparedness.
(2) Activation of Outdoor Warning Sirens
Chief Litsey provided a summary leading up to the current dilemma
with the activation of the outdoor warning sirens as noted in his
memorandum and attachments. He stated that although the siren
activation unit from the old police station has been brought over to
the new public safety facility, it has not been set up given the
recommendation last fall that each member city outfit the sirens
within their respective communities so they can be activated by
Hennepin County Dispatch. He noted, however, this may no longer
be the best solution in the short-term given some of the anticipated
changes taking place at the county level in regard to siren
activation. He was also holding out hope that some grant money
might become available to assist with either upgrading or replacing
the current sirens in the South Lake area. Chief Litsey indicated,
therefore, that he was hesitant to recommend that the member
cities move ahead spending the approximately $5,000 per siren for
activation hardware that may be obsolete soon. He suggested that
for now the siren activation equipment from the old police station be
installed at the new public safety facility along with a change in
protocol so that fire as well as police personnel can set off the
sirens. He noted Fire Chief Mark DuCharme was supportive of this
change in protocol. Chief Litsey commented that there would be
some expense to reinstalling the equipment and running an
(, antenna to the roof at the new public safety facility, but said it would
be far less costly than the previously recommended option. He
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Cl-lief of Police
24150 SMITHTOWN ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MN 55331-8598
Fax (952) 474-4477
MEMORANDUM
TO:
SLMPD Coordinating Committee Members
FROM:
Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police
DATE:
February 20, 2004 - Friday
RE:
Use of the Indoor Firearms Range
The indoor firearms range recently became fully operational and our staff has been
working hard as promised to maximize its usage by other neighboring law enforcement
agencies for a reasonable fee. Much of this responsibility has been delegated within our
organization to Sergeant Dan Rusch, senior range coordinator, and to Officer Jim
Williams, junior range coordinator. They researched and developed, in consultation with
Deputy Chief John Nieling and myself, the attached rules and procedures for our Firearms
Training Facility, drawing upon examples from other law enforcement agencies which
operate indoor firearm ranges. In conjunction with this effort, Sergeant Rusch has been
marketing our firearms range to neighboring law enforcement agencies and hosted an
open house on February 18,2004. I have attached samples of the letters he has sent out.
He is currently in the process of firming up commitments from interested law
enforcement agencies. The initial hourly rate has been set at $125 per hour, but can be
adjusted once we have a better idea of actual costs over and above the expense of having
one of our officers trained as a range operator present when the facility is in use. I am
also in the process of finalizing a legal agreement that law enforcement agencies must
enter into before using the range. I will make sure this is reviewed and approved by
Department Attorney Kenneth Potts.
The primary policy decision before the Coordinating Committee is to what extent, if any,
the firearms range will be made available for non law enforcement use at a yet to be
determined fee. We currently have a request from an individual in the area who is
instructing conceal/carry courses pursuant to the new state law and would like to rent our
firearms range to qualify his students on the skill portion of the training. He is holding
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay
MemoralllldllIlm to SLMPD Coordillllatillllg Committee
Use of the Firearms Rallllge
Page 2
the classroom training at the South Shore Senior/Community Center. Other possible
requests could come from sponsors of hunter safety courses, sportsmen organizations and
individuals wanting open range time in which to target shoot. At a minimum, criteria
needs to be established on what non law enforcement organizations andlor individuals can
use the range as a safeguard against someone practicing hislher firearms proficiency for
some illegal use. There would also have to be an indemnification waiver signed by range
users. OUf insurance agent was not aware of any limitations on our liability policy with
the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) that prohibited the use of the
firearms range for non law enforcement agencies. I will firm this up if the decision is
made to expand the use of the range beyond law enforcement purposes.
I look forward to discussing this in more detail at the upcoming SLMPD Coordinating
Committee Meeting.
SOUTH lAKE M!NNETOi\JKA
POUCE DEPARTMENT
.".".,....~B:O-~ "=""""""""""''''..'''''''''"''.,.,,~ -
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Chief of Police
~~~"'~"""""'';;'~~~''''''''''''''''~;~~~~'''''''''''''''''''''''''''~~4~~~'''''''~ ~;~ ~'E=-"'''''''''''''~ .... '~wH~
810 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-1913
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
November 17, 2003
Chief Craig Anderson
Minnetrista Police Department
7701 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, MN 55364
"~:<::..:~,
::.'" ,"' ';:":-":::-":" ,..<. '._.: '::', ........ .
. ",', '".. "',...,' ,',", - '., ...
.' ,,' ....'...... ...... . .... ",-'-' '
The South Lake Minnetonk~;Poli.9~'De.p~Il.l~~risti~~iIlgppmpletion of a new public
safety facility that will inclttti~ ~!19.g9tfire~.f31i~e.,~ya,re inviting law
enforcement agencies to ~OIlsider.jhe~~~;QftJii~;rOOg~.foptije,~r fIrearms training.
:) ".. . - , :. ...' ", ,.~ ,,;,. .:.... ,,":' - .. -> '..... ':.
Dear Chief Anderson,
.': ,.-:. ','. :.- ':;-<:.,: .. ' .
"."" - -"-",,<'''' ::::
The range is being outfItt~~.ib)T,.s.~.~ell';iSQ . ~r~tt~ ..tal?~~!i;is a locally based company
that has built and equippe~.~g~j , . ",' ; ....'., . e'p, .ri:fu,g~~ throughout the United
States. The bullet trap is t~eB~'ii ;~t~'i:.:@r"~~ifh allows for all calibers of
ammunition up to 50 calib~~;{'iF~~ r ............U~S()>Q~~Jb.es, each being 25 yards in
length. Targets can be conirpll~~,~!~~yt,~~l1iW',~2WP\l(~~software or manually from the
shooting stalls allowing for a iPq~t!tyg(,Q~trailim$qeIltirioS. It is also set up so officers
can move downrange to a comb~t;~ .... ~ll,r~:'.\~':.~~fely fITe pistols in close quarters.
We are also giving considerationt~f\.:~.,,'g\"i:.:/,~ofthe range for shotgun training
with .00 buckshot and limited rifle traih,ptg:U'{/'# .....
."., .-,~
As with aU indoor ranges, there are expenses for maintenance, lead removal, equipment,
utilities and the cost of having a South Lake Minnetonka range operator present.
Because of these and other expenses, we will be charging an hourly fee for use of the
range. I have been advised that the Maple Grove/Hennepin County range rates will be
$175.00 an hour in 2004. We anticipate charging a lesser hourly rate which is yet to be
determined. As already indicated, a South Lake Minnetonka range operator will be
present to operate the equipment allowing your training officer to concentrate on the
tasks at hand. If an agency has a newly hired officer or an officer who needs to qualify
with a new pistol the range will be available at no charge provided that a South Lake
Minnetonka range operator is on duty and can assist.
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood. Shorewood and Tanka Bay
PAGE 2-llIDOORFllffiARMS RANGE
Besides official training use, we are also considering having open range times for
licensed peace officers to use at a nominal charge under the supervision of a South Lake
Minnetonka range operator. We reserve the right to restrict the type of ammunition used
and will likely have a selection of approved ammo available for purchase.
Weare pleased to offer this new training facility to law enforcement agencies. The range
will be available for use once our staffhas been trained and familiarized with its
operation. We anticipate this would be no later than March 1,2004. Prior to that time,
we will have an open house for agencies to preview the range. If you are interested in
exploring this opportunity further please contact Officer Jim Williams or myself at (952)
474-3261.
Sincerely;
Q4~.
Daniel Rusch
Sergeant/Range Master
SOUTH LAKE MiNNETONKA
POUCE DEPARTMENT
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Chief of PDllce .
~.!l'J~~~_ .- ......"''''-=-'=-'=,,,,.!atomPt~~ol'>'C =:
24150 SMITHTOWN ROAD
SHOREWOOD. MN 55331-8598
~~. """",".3a",,,-~'*"_""""- ~'-'_ _ ....~..-.~~li'A.'>=""""'-"'-'~,,~~ -"'.....;..-="""~*"::-h.".,.,''''..,..,..,,~_ :r.; _ 1~1
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
February 7,2004
Chief Craig Anderson
Minnetrista Police Department
7701 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, MN 55364
Dear Chief Anderson,
.: ',. "~',"-"'.".
... - ,",', ..
. . .
. '-'-, .-.-'. .
," . - '''::'';'';';''''':'-"-::''''''':.::-..:..:. . '.
You and your fIrearms instnictoR~}arein\i'ited ;t~:~tt~l1d. a~ o,~'en house for the South
Lake Minnetonka Police :Ot<ptii.~nl~i1tFiir~ons"Iramii~,i~F'aPilitY on February 18,2004 at
1400 hours.' .. ..,
,'.-:;:"::'::~.
'j'
...., '.-- ..
The open house will consi$tofatQPr~~~~~Q~.~~~~~?~,ot;t1i~range and a meeting to
discuss costs, rules, procect~rys;;.;~~'~p.y,()t~er}!~pe;;00~~~'Pf~)"arise during the course of
this open house. Please cOllt~ctme~t.x~ttt. ~arlie~tl;~QnyillJ~nge if you and/or a
representative of your agency\wiUatteri?t~isop~nhou~~,'T~You are unable to attend,
arrangements can be made tome~t a.nth~~~ctJ~$~~;q~~9fthe range at a mutually
convenient time. ....... ............. < "'ii"",;;;.,> ..../ ;;. ..'
..".... "", -, '.
.-, -. ',' ,- "', ,',-,."",
I look forward to seeing you at the~open,'hQPs~J;./;
.... ".l'
C:S~VL
Sgt. Dan Rusch
Range Coordinator
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shore wood and Tonka Bay
SOUTH LAKE MiNNETONKA
POliCE DEPARTMENT
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Chief of Police
""-v- ..."..,,-...:.
JO:iI
""""",'..""""""",~_ ''''''''''~}''m.'''''''''' ~,l """'~""~.~ID[[f~~~'~~~ ~~~~ """-~
~ "" ~~_~ H..~-sl
24150 SMITHTOWN ROAD
SHOREWOOD. MN 55331-8598
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
February 19,2004
Chief Craig Anderson
Minnetrista Police Department
7701 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, MN 55364
",'.;. -"-, .
. ..' .....
. ....
This letter is to inform you that OU( Department F!featms Rarlge is ready for use. As you
know, we are offering ourral1g~~:'otIen:f::tlbYJ!reapol~ce ag~p:cfes for ftrearms training.
The cost for use of the range~lI pe ~1~5,06~'11our,,A:Sqtitl1.t~e Minnetonka Police
Department range operator willl5easslgp.~Qf~operaf~}!:L~~~ge:yo. J1tr. ols and oversee the
sessions. Please take a mon\eijlt()ry,~a,tHeatt~9h.i~(IO~~~~1ion;;yR\1les.
Dear Chief Anderson,
. '-" '.~ ," ,-;",,,,: -,.'
If you have any questions, ort~by~d<I1~~t9$~~pbYMd~,f~~theia~*lity, please contact me at
(952) 960-1607. We can alsore.~~tve datesll11dtiW9;~;t'6{yoUr~g if you choose to utilize
our range.
I look forward to hearing from you.,
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior. Greenwood. Shorewood and Tonka Bay
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
FIREARMS TRAINING FACiliTY
OPERATIONAL RULES
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this standard operating procedure
is to establish guidelines for the proper use of the
Firearms Training Facility.
II
SCOPE:
This procedure will apply to all South Lake
Minnetonka personnel and other State, County,
Municipal, or Special Interest Groups and other
individuals as authorized by the Chief of Police
that are utilizing the law Enforcement Training
Facility.
iii DEFINITIONS:
A. Firearms Training Facility:
Shall be referred to as the Range or Facility.
B. Agency:
Any State, County, Municipal, Federal, Military or Special Interest
Group utilizing the facility.
C. Firearm:
Any Firearm as defined by Minnesota State Statutes.
D. Weapon:
Any defensive equipment defined by Minnesota State Statute or the
South Lake Minnetonka Police Department.
'E. Explosive Device:
Any device as defined by Minnesota State Statutes.
F. Sworn Law Enforcement Officers:
As defined by Minnesota State Statutes.
G. Special Interest Groups:
Those groups and organizations who specialize in Law Enforcement
functions or related learning areas. Companies or manufacturers of
Law Enforcement related products or training aids. Organizations
designed to educate Law Enforcement personnel or future Law
Enforcement personnel.
Examples:
1. Sworn Police Officers
2. Sworn Correctional Officers
3. Reserve Officers
4. Auxiliary Deputies or Officers
5. Police Explorer Organizations
6. Military Police or Reserve Units
7. Police Academies
8. DNR Hunter Education
9. Police Citizen Academy
H. Range Supervisor:
South Lake Minnetonka Officer who is assigned to oversee the
operation of the facility.
!. Range Operator:
South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Officers trained and
authorized to operate and oversee range use.
J. Firearms Instructor:
Those having met the criteria of the Minnesota POST BOARD,
and/or having been designated as an Instructor by their respective
Agency.
IV GENERAL:
A. Access to the Facility by outside Agencies shall require either
a verbal or written request directed to the Range Supervisor.
B. The South Lake Minnetonka Police Department training takes
priority in all instances of schedule conflict. The South Lake
Minnetonka Police Department reserves the right to alter
scheduling at any time.
C. No one is allowed to utilize the Facility without the knowledge
of the Range Supervisor. South Lake Minnetonka officers may
use the Range provided a Range Supervisor or Patrol Sergeant
authorizes the use and is on duty or on site.
D. The Range Supervisor will assist in coordinating training.
E. At no time will agencies be allowed to use the Facility without
the presence of the Range Supervisor or his/her designated
representative.
F. Hold Harmless Agreements and Agency Requirements:
1. As required by the Law Enforcement Training Facility, all
Agencies and organizations using the Facility will execute an
Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement as provided by
the Law Enforcement Training Facility.
2. All instructors are required to maintain current instructor status
and maintain First Aid and C.P.R. certifications.
3. Agencies are required to maintain a one (1) Instructor to four (4)
student ratio while using the Facility.
V. PROCEDURES:
A. Firearms shot in the Facility shall be limited to Law
Enforcement duty style weapons and related equipment.
Handguns shall be approved for carry or use by the Agency.
1. Handgun calibers shall be .38, 9mm, 10mm, 045, 040, .380,
Ai, 044, .22, .357.
2. Shotgun calibers shall be 12ga., 20ga., in shot sizes of #8,
#7, #6, #4, 0 Buck, 00 Buck, Rifle Slug.
3. No other firearms or ammunition may be shot on the
Facility without the prior permission of the Range
Supervisor.
B. Instructors from other agencies who use the Facility are subject
to the same procedures as the South Lake Minnetonka Police
Department instructors.
1. Upon arrival instructors are to check in with the
Range Supervisor or hislher designee.
2. Instructors are required to submit a written course outline to
the Range Supervisor or his/her designee for approval.
South Lake Minnetonka Police Department Range Supervisor
or operators will program courses into the range computer.
3. Upon completion of training, Agency instructors will check in
with the Range Supervisor or his/her designee and together
will inspect the Range and Training Rooms used for damage.
Users should understand that any damage to the range or
Training Rooms, other than normal wear and tear, will be the
responsibility of the user, and will be billed for the repair.
4. Instructors are responsible to clean the range. Brass,
ammunition and garbage will be picked up prior to departure.
5. Instructors are responsible to report any injuries, other than
minor to the Range Supervisor or his/her designee.
C. At all times the "Four (4) Cardinal Rules" of firearm safety will
be strictly adhered to, and any violation of the safety rules will
result in removal from the Range.
1. Treat all firearms as if they are loaded at all times.
2. Keep your finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard
until your sights are on target and you are ready to shoot.
3. Do not point a firearm at anything you are not willing to shoot
or destroy.
4. Be sure of your intended target and backstop.
D. All shooters and persons on the Range are required to have
and wear the following:
1. Full wrap around eye protection or prescription eye glasses.
2. Ear protection. (Full ear protection or ear plugs)
3. Full footwear. No sandals, no shower slides, no open toe
shoes.
4. No clothing which is bright red in color. Bright red is reserved
for Instructors only.
5. Shooters are encouraged to wear their body armor.
E. Other Safety Rules:
1. Use of the Law Enforcement Training Facility is a privilege
subject to withdrawal for failure to adhere to safety
procedures or administrative controls.
2. The designated Range Supervisor or operator shall be
empowered to enforce all rules and regulations concerning
this Facility.
3. All personnel entering the Range facility shall carry firearms in
a safe manner, adhering to the following:
a. Revolvers shall be carried either holstered,
unloaded and in a case or with the cylinder
open and the cylinder chambers empty.
b. Semi-Automatic pistols shall be carried either
holstered, unloaded and in a case or with the
slide locked in the rear position and the
magazines removed.
c. Special weapons such as shotguns, rifles, etc.,
shall be carried in a case or with the action
opened, when possible, and all magazines
removed.
4. The Range Operator may inspect any weapon or type of
ammunition to insure conformance to safety standards. The
final determination as to the use of any weapon or type of
ammunition rests with the RANGE SUPERVISOR OR
HIS/HER DESIGNEE.
5. All firing shall be upon official targets supplied or approved by
the Range Supervisor.
6. All shooters will review a safety briefing and fundamental
weapons training on clearing the weapons correctly and
correct range behavior and operation.
7. Range instructors will brief all shooters to make every effort to
direct their shots into the targets and not the target holders,
light guards or floor.
8. No firing will be done unless a qualified South Lake
Minnetonka Police Department range operator is present.
9. Obey all firing line commands.
10. Never point a weapon, loaded or unloaded, at anyone.
11. There shall be no handling of weapons on the firing line when
any person is down range.
12. Keep muzzle pointed in a safe direction down range at all
times.
13. No one will be permitted to shoot at this range after having
consumed any alcohol or drugs.
14. No food or beverage is allowed in the range.
15. No homemade targets or target stands may be used on the
range, unless prior approval from the Range Supervisor.
16. No Steel reactionary targets are permitted on the Range.
17.Any violation of safe weapon handling will result in your
removal from the Range.
18. Firearms Instructors and Training Officers shall be
responsible to the Range Supervisor or operator for
compliance of these rules by their personnel.
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT FIREARMS
TRAINING FACILITY
RANGE RULES AND PROCEDURES
1. The designated Range Supervisor or Operator shall be empowered
to enforce all rules and regulations concerning this Training Facility.
2. Use of the Training Facility is a privilege subject to withdrawal for
failure to adhere to safety procedures or administrative controls.
3. All personnel entering the Range shall carryall firearms in a safe
manner, adhering to the following:
a. Revolvers shall be carried either holstered or unloaded and in
a case, or with the cylinder open and the cylinder chambers
empty.
b. Semi-automatic pistols shall be carried either holstered or
unloaded and in a case, or with the slide locked in the rear
position and the magazines removed.
c. Special weapons such as shotguns, rifles, etc., shall be carried
unloaded in a case or with the chamber opened when
possible, and all magazines removed.
4. The Range Operator may inspect any weapon or type of ammunition
to insure conformance to safety standards. The final determination
as to the use of any weapon or type of ammunition rests with the
RANGE SUPERVISOR.
5. All firing shall be upon official targets supplied or approved by the
Range Supervisor.
6. Users should understand that if they cause any damage to the range,
other than normal wear and tear, they will be held responsible for
that damage, and will be billed for the repair.
7. Proper instructor/shooter ratio will be observed. No more than four
(4) shooters per instructor.
8. All shooters will review a safety briefing and fundamental weapons
training on clearing the weapons and correct range behavior and
operation prior to use of the Range.
9. Range instructors will brief aU shooters to make every effort to direct
their shots into the targets and not the frames, lights guards or floor.
10. No firing will be done unless a qualified South lake Minnetonka
Police Department Range Operator is present.
11. Ear and Eye protection will be worn by all persons in all designated
areas.
12. Obey all firing line commands.
13. Never point a weapon, loaded or empty, at anyone.
14. There shall be no handling of weapons on the firing line when any
person is down range.
15. Keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction, down range at all times.
is. Keep the finger away from the trigger, except when ready to fire.
17.No one will be permitted to shoot at this range after having
consumed any alcohol or drugs.
18. No food or beverage is allowed in the range.
. 19. Brass shall be picked up and put in the appropriate container. The
range will be swept and garbage disposed of.
20. Any violation of safe weapons handling will result in your removal
from the range.
21. Firearms instructors and Training Officers shall be responsible to the
Range Supervisor or operator for compliance of these rules by their
personnel.
Page 3 of 13
April 28, 2004
Meeting Minutes - SLMPD Coordinating Committee
advised that the cost of one Taser is approximately $800, including the
holster. He also advised that there are three possible outside sources
who are interested in donating funds to allow the department to purchase
enough additional tasers so that each on-duty officer will have one.
C. Recognition of Individual Organizational Contributions
(1) Donation - Universal Dog Scanner
The committee was advised that while taking a tour of the new police
department Shorewood resident Suellen Douglas asked if SLMPD had a
dog scanner and was informed that the department did not have one.
Shortly after this occurred, Suellen Douglas came back to the department
with not only a dog scanner but also a basket of dog goodies. Chief Litsey
wanted to thank not only Suellen, but also Dona Nesseth, Gary and Lori
Cocking, and Dr. Patty Waples for this gesture.
(2) South Lake Minnetonka Crime Prevention Fund
Chief Litsey advised the Committee that the Crime Prevention Fund was
very surprised and appreciative of the thank you letter they received from
the Coordinating Committee for their interim funding for continued
membership in the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force.
(3) Reserve Officer Todd Saucier
The Committee was advised that Sgt. Rusch had stated that it would be
advantageous to have the foyer and control room in the firearms range
carpeted to aid in sound reduction and cleanliness. After hearing about
this need, Reserve Officer Saucier volunteered to install carpet at no
charge in these areas. His time and material donation was approximately
$500.
D. Use of Indoor Firearms Range
(Memorandum/Attachments from Chief Bryan Litsey)
Per the Coordinating Committee's request to obtain additional information
on how other law enforcement agencies with indoor ranges address public
use, Chief Litsey asked SLMPD firearms instructor Dan Rusch to do some
research on this topic. It was found that very few agencies open up their
range to the public. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility has
two ranges within their facility and allows civilians to shoot in only one of
the ranges. Letters have been sent to other law enforcement agencies
with only one expressing interest at this point.
Page 4 of 13
April 28, 2004
Meeting Minutes - SLMPD Coordinating Committee
Chief Litsey advised he had followed up with the League of MN Cities
Insurance Trust and was directed to speak with our assigned loss
prevention consultant through the LMCIT for measures that can be taken
to limit liability exposure. The range could be opened up to the public on a
trial basis.
Mayor Nagel expressed concern that it be opened only to those who have
a permit to acquire/carry and that the agreed upon fee be sufficient to
cover any overtime costs. Mayor Love said while he supported the
firearms range he is concerned about opening it up to the public. Mayor
Nagel stated that law enforcement agencies must receive first priority and
that it may take some time for interest to peak.
E. Vehicle Forfeiture Issue - Deephaven Police Department
(Memorandum/Attachments from Chief Bryan Litsey)
Chief Litsey advised the Coordinating Committee members that there is
currently a dispute between the SLMPD and Deephaven Police regarding
the Kenneth Mixon OWl forfeited vehicle. Because the Committee had not
had an opportunity to read the attached memorandum, Chief Litsey
summarized the situation. He stated that a Deephaven police officer had
seen the vehicle in question being driven by a driver he thought to be
revoked. Because he was out of position at the time to stop the driver, he
radioed to the SLMPD who in turn ended up stopping the vehicle and
finding the driver to be OWl. The arrest paperwork was filled out by
SLMPD Officer Jim Williams since he initiated the stop. The defendant
was later found guilty of OWl.
Chief Litsey stated it was a "no brainer" that the forfeiture proceeds (one-
half of 70%) be shared by the two agencies. Attorney Ken Potts has tried
to work out an agreement with Deephaven and was told by Deephaven's
lieutenant that they would be "good neighbors". However, Deephaven is
unwilling to share the proceeds. The case will now be heard before
Judge David Duffy sometime in June. The Board feels this is an
unfortunate situation and that it is ridiculous that this has gone on to an
attorney.
F. Emergency Preparedness Matters
(1) Update - Hennepin County Hazard Mitigation Plan
(MemorandumAttachments from Chief Bryan Litsey)
Chief Litsey thanked everyone for promptly returning their resolution.
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Chief of Police
24150 SMITHTOWN ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MN 55331-8598
Fax (952) 474-4477
MEMORANDUM
TO:
SLMPD Coordinating Committee Members
FROM:
Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police
DATE:
April 28, 2004 - Wednesday
RE:
Use of Indoor Firearms Range
At the SLMPD Coordinating Committee Meeting on February 24,2004, additional
information was requested on how other law enforcement agencies with indoor ranges
address public use. I asked Sergeant Dan Rusch, who is our senior use of forcelfirearms
instructor, to do some additional research on this topic and report back to me. The
attached memorandum from Sergeant Rusch documents his findings along with his
recommendations if our firearms range was opened to restricted public use.
I also followed up as promised with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
(LMCIT) to see ifthere were any limitations on our liability coverage in terms of who can
use our indoor firearms range. I was told there were none, but that it would be good idea
to speak with our assigned loss prevention consultant through the LMCIT, Lori Severson,
for some preventive measures we can take to minimize our liability exposure. As of this
date, we have yet to connect.
This will be a discussion item at the upcoming SLMPD Coordinating Committee
Meeting.
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewoad and Tanka Bay
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
24150 Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Bryan T. Litsey
Chief of Police
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax Line (952) 474-4477
M- E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M
TO: Chief Litsey
FROM: Sergeant Daniel Rusch
DATE: April 26, 2004
RE: Civilian Use of Range
I checked with 6 ranges in the metro area to find out if any allow civilians to use their
facilities. All ranges except 1 are restricted to law enforcement use only. The only range
that allows civilians to shoot for re-creation is the South Metro Public Safety Training
Facility. There is a separate range at this facility for civilians to shoot in so they are not
using the law enforcement range. Kevin Kelleher, former chief of the Wayzata Police
Department supervises this facility. He said that officers were uncomfortable with civilians
using the range at first but that they are starting to get used to it and are feeling better
about it. He said there is a separate set of rules for civilians and they do not shoot combat
courses, only target shooting. He said this part of the range is open to individuals, gun
clubs and gun safety courses. The open shooting is on Saturday mornings from 0900 to
1200. Lanes are rented for $10.00 for a half hour. It appears to be first come-first serve.
Attached is a printout of the SMPST web site.
Brooklyn Park had allowed citizens to use the range when it first opened but now it is
restricted to law enforcement only. Officer George Moore is in charge of the range. He
said that as maintenance costs rose and citizen interest waned, they just discontinued
opening it to the public.
Several of the other ranges are open to youth firearms training. Hennepin County
conducted a concealed carry course at the Maple Grove facility and that was the only time
civilians were allowed to shoot at the range, otherwise it is restricted to law enforcement
only.
I know from previous conversations that Minnetonka doesn't allow civilian use other than
Serving the South Lake l'vlinnetonka Communities ofE.xcelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Ba)'
youth firearms safety training. They allow other law enforcement agencies to use it for a
fee. The same holds true for St. Louis Park.
Burnsville doesn't even allow other agencies to use their range. They felt that letting other
agencies use it would increase the costs for upkeep and maintenance and restricting use to
their agency only would reduce wear and tear on the facility.
If you have any other questions or would like me to solicit information from other agencies
let me know. This is only a small sampling but it seems to be the prevailing attitude.
The following agencies and ranges were consulted: Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Maple
Grove/Hennepin County, South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, Brooklyn Park,
New Brighton, and Burnsville.
In the event that we do proceed in the direction of allowing civilians to use our range, I
think it would be prudent to ensure that some type of restrictions are in place. Specifically,
a minimum requirement should be a valid permit to acquire a handgun. In order to
possess such a permit a background check is required. This would disqualify those with a
felony or violent misdemeanor in their background from using the range. We should also
reserve the right to prohibit anyone from using the range if, in the opinion of the range
operator, they may be a risk or in some way would compromise the safety of the public.
The bottom line is that we have to ask ourselves this question: Does the need for additional
revenue from civilian use of the range justify the potential risks of allowing an
unsatisfactory character to use it? I do, however, endorse allowing close friends and
relatives of officers to fire at the range on a limited basis as well as local government
officials.
S'erving the South Lake Mil1netonka COInmunities ofEccelsior,
Shorewood and Tonka Bay