022304 CC Reg AgP
':-
ii:
~\ .~ I
"
(
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor Love_
Garfunkel
Lizee
Zerby _
Turgeon _
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2004 (Att. - Minutes)
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2004 (Att. - Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA- Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda &.Adopt Resolutions
Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following re1lUJWI1. from
Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.- Claims List)
B. Staffmg (none)
C. Resolution Supporting the West Hennepin Area Housing Land Trust CDBG Application
(Att.-Administrator's memorandum, Draft Resolution)
D. Declaring Adequacy of Petition for Local hnprovement on Timber Lane (Att. - Public
Works Director's memorandum, Draft Resolution)
E. Resolution Approving Wetland Setback Variances - Lake Linden Drive (Att. - On\ft
Resolutions)
Applicant:
Locations:
Linden Hills Development, LLC
5965 Linden Court and 5975 Linden Court
F. Sign Permit Approval (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum)
Applicant: De' Paris Nails
Location: 23700 State Highway 7
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken)
(--
~.~
t
..
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 23, 2004
PAGE20F2
s. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. 2003 Y ear~End Report on the Southshore Senior Community Center by Joyce Flury
(Att.~ Southshore Center Report)
B. Appointment of Representative to the Library Committee - Report by Peggy Bauer (Att.~
City of Excelsior memorandum)
6. PUBLIC HEARING
7. PARKS - Report by Representative
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held February 10,2004 (Att.- Draft Mrputes)
B. Music in the Parks (Public Works Director's memorandum)
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Minor Subdivision/Combination (Att. - Planning Director's memorandum; Planning
Commission's Findings of Fact) .
Applicant:
Location:
D.R. Verdoom (Rep. By Sharratt Design & Co.)
28210 and 28220 Woodside Road
9. GENERAUNEW BUSINESS
A. Request by Mr. Vanderlinde regarding 5550-5560 Shorewood Lane and Public Safety
Building (Art. - Public Works Director's memorandum)
B. Appointments to the Shorewood Parks Foundation Board of Directors (Art. - Park
Foundation's memorandum)
C. Fire Code Ordinance (Att. - Draft Ordinance)
10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLlC WORKS
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A. A~istrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Intersection
2. Public Safety Facilities
B. Mayor & City Council
12. ADJOURN
-,
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 23, 2004
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
For the record, please print your name and address below. Thank you.
Name
Address
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
February 23, 2004
f1.1-kn '. .1lCV1l\ I.t ffcy. .fYv-rvt
Yf1JM : Stdkj I 2?3 -D'f
J r-e.3- u: M~ '
Shorewood City Council
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Re: Resolution regarding Timberlane water service extension
Dear Council Members;
I did not sign the petition that Shorewood is now considering asking for city water. For sure, I wanted to be
a good neighbor and help Hans Schaub but I knew I would be misleading the city if I did. I do not need nor
do I want city water. 15 the cost of this proposed extension to be paid for by all of the Timberlane
homeowners? And will we be forced to hook up to it immediately? This should be made clear to everyone.
Before the city spends time and money on a feasibility report, the possibility of hooking up with Tanka Bay
water should be checked out. One neighbor on Timberlane already has Tonka Bay water and it certainly
would be more cost efficient to use that line on Timberlane if it comes down to it.
'-
It is 600 feet from the Lawtonka water line to the first house on Timberlane, and another 600 feet from that
house to the last house on Timberlane that would "need" city water. Hooking up to Tanka Bay water would
save 600 feet of digging plus very costly and unnecessary road repairs.
But, again, I did not sign the petition and on the formal resolution you have me down as supporting it. This
should be changed,
/D~' /..;...l~...(N..<> r~ -d. r "
v: ~. . _ () 1Ij1./ /: "'-' l;k..c../~-.(A..~",' 1...-"--'
,...(/Y\.-(!/<'~Jr.u: ........... -
Sincerely
L- .-'" .15"
.j ~~ Co .;iJ
!).'1J;/// /lt~' -!/,of //
.; ( V ItA 1.-(;' f.-/
Marg . aegJr
5445 Timberlane
Shorewood, Minnesota
-,e-C) --
.....~<.:J 1-6
::C 1~.kJ.. :e:.~..L~_~.__
~...s-cr 7
....t;:S '70 --
0-.6-<1 :;J,
''0 f(j
ro- ~J
() \: '*"
9 ~ '" I
I ~ ,
'" !
\. .'-.
"
~ '..l
~ 0
~ ~-..Jj
.......
,
l ~
\
i
~
;/
I . d E080- Il.oJ,-aS6 F;IIBS -..-.."
a.:J-aa)J BaoJ,:II oj, 0 10 ..IBW
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 23 February 2004
7:00 P.M.
.
. An EDA meeting will immediately follow the Regular City Council meeting this evening.
Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3B: Staffing - No action required.
Agenda Item #3C: The West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) is
submitting an application for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding in
order to assist in the purchase of one property in the cities of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, or
Orono. We are hopeful that this proposal will be seen as a promising pilot, and one that
has the advantage of keeping a housing unit affordable over a long time. A resolution
supporting the application has been prepared for Council approval.
.
Agenda Item #3D: The City is in receipt of a petition for the extension of municipal water
service along Timber Lane. Staffhas reviewed the petition and recommends that the
resolution, which declares the petition adequate, be approved. This may be approved by
a simple majority vote.
Agenda Item #3E: Last October the City Council approved wetland setback variances for two
lots in the Linden Hills development. You may recall that there was some question of the
MCWD's determination that a low area in the plat was a wetland. The Council agreed to
compromise with a 35-foot setback requirement of which 16.5 feet (MCWD's requirement)
would be protected and identified as a wetland buffer. There is no record of a resolution
having been adopted for this item. Two resolutions, one for each lot, are included in your
packet. Approval requires a simple majority vote.
Agenda Item #3F: Shorewood Village Center continues to fill its unoccupied space with new
tenants. The latest, De'Paris Nails, has requested a sign permit. Similar to the two permits
considered at the last meeting, approval is recommended, with a stipulation that the sign
n
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLEO PAPER
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 23 February 2004
Page 2 of2
may not be lit until such time as the Shopping Center is successful in obtaining a revision
to its current sign plan and C.U.P.
Agenda Item #5A: Joyce Flury will be present to give the 2003 year-end report on the
Southshore Senior Community Center.
Agenda Item #5B: Excelsior Branch Librarian Peggy Bauer will be present to discuss the
request for a volunteer from the Shorewood community to serve on the Library
Committee. The Library Committee will provide assistance in the planning, fmancing,
and building of a library for the South Lake Minnetonka patrons which will be either
remodeled or rebuilt in downtown Excelsior.
Agenda Item #7 A: Park Chairperson, Arnst will provide the Park Commission Report.
Agenda Item #7B: At the February 10th, 2004, Park Commission meeting, a recommendation .
was made and passed to establish "Music in the Park," at Freeman Park, on June 11,
July 9, and August 13,2004. Park Chairperson, Arnst will elaborate in detail regarding
this recommendation.
Agenda Item #8A: Mr. Daryl Verdoorn requested a minor subdivision and combination,
which would allow him to convey a strip of his property to his son's property next door.
The smaller parcel is substandard with respect to area. While the division/combination
would make the smaller lot "technically buildable" (i.e. 70 percent of the minimum lot
size for the R-IA/S district) the gerrymandered lot line did little to actually improve the
lot. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial ofthe application. Their
finding of facts is attached for your review. The Council should direct staff to prepare a
resolution for the next meeting.
Agenda Item #9A: On January 12, 2004, Mr. Vanderlinde, owner of property located at 5550-60
Shorewood Lane, appeared before the City Council voicing concern over the excess dirt .
that was placed on the north side of the Public Safety Building.
The task set before staffwas to review drainage for the site, and to insure that the
construction ofthe site portion ofthe project met standards regarding grading and
contract change orders. A site survey was conducted and found that the project is in
conformance to the standards for construction.
Agenda Item #9B: The Shorewood Parks Foundation has nominated Don Kelly to serve
another three-year term on its Board of Directors. The City Council makes appointments
to the Board of Directors by motion.
Agenda Item #9C: The State of Minnesota has promulgated a new fire code, adopting by
reference the International Fire Code. The State Code for many years has used the
Uniform Fire Code. The attached ordinance adopts the new code for the City of
Shorewood.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
6:30 P.M.
MINUTES
DRAfT
1.
CONVENE SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, and Zerby; Administrator Dawson
Absent:
Councilmembers Lizee and Turgeon
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda, noting the sole purpose of the meeting was to interview
candidates for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers.
2. INTERVIEW CANDIDATES FOR MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED
DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS
Council interviewed James Calkins and Monica Gross regarding appointment to the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District Board of Managers.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, adjourning the City Council Special Meeting of
February 9, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. Motion passed 4/0.
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
#JfJ
.'
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
DRAFT
1.
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Turgeon, and Zerby, Administrator Dawson;
Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; and Planning Director
Nielsen
Absent:
Councilmember Lizee
B. Review Agenda
Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda for the evening. Administrator Dawson requested Item 12 be changed
to Executive Session.
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, January 26, 2004
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of
January 26, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
B.
City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes, January 26, 2004
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of
January 26,2004, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, Jannary 26, 2004
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
January 26, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
D. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes, January 26,2004
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes
of January 26, 2004, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
#- 28
!'
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Page 2 of6
<.
"'
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and
Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Staffing - No action required
C. City Clerk's License Approvals - No action required
D. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-013, "A Resolution Authorizing Submittal of the
2004 Hennepin County Grant Application for Municipal Source Separated
Recyclables. "
E. Temporary Sign Permit Approval for Curves for Women, 19905 Highway 7
(Waterford Center)
F.
Sign Permit Approvals for Great Clips, 23760 State Highway 7 and for Pizza
Prima, 23770 State Highway 7
.
G. Authorize to Release Escrow Account for 6070 Strawberry Lane - Ryan Johannsen
Motion passed 4/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation by Shorewood Parks Foundation
Ken Dallman, 5780 Eureka Road, and President of the Shorewood Parks Foundation, presented the City .
with a check in the amount of $5,000 from the proceeds of the 2nd Annual Art for the Parks event held on
November 1,2003. He stated he believed the Art Show to be a success, and he looked forward to the 3rd
Annual show to be held on November 6, 2004. He thanked all the volunteers for their efforts at the most
recent show, and stated he appreciated Woody Love's contributions toward graphics and publicity of the
event. He went on to note the Parks Foundation was planning a Breakfast /Brunch for May 25,2004 as a
fundraising event. He invited all Council to act as table captains and invite seven other guests to this
event. He stated the Parks Foundation enjoyed being able to present the Council with the proceeds from
the Art for the Parks event.
Mayor Love thanked Mr. Dallman and the Parks Foundation, noting he appreciated all the hard work that
had gone into planning and participation in the Art for the Parks event. He also appreciated the
Foundation's efforts in meeting its goals for the year.
fu response to Councilmember Turgeon's question, Mr. Dallman explained the brochure detailing the
project was in need of update to include the family patio idea that would utilize the bricks purchased as
part of on going fundraising efforts.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
'. FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Page 3 of 6
6. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
7. PARKS
There had not been a meeting of the Park Commission since the most recent Regular City Council
Meeting; thus, there was nothing to report. Engineer Brown noted a Park Commission Meeting was
scheduled for Tuesday, February 10,2004.
8. PLANNING
Chair Bailey reported on the February 3, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes
of that meeting).
.
Councilmember Turgeon complimented Chair Bailey and V ice Chair Pisula and the Commission on a j ob
well done in the past year.
9. GENERALINEW BUSINESS
A. Nelson Right-of-Way Permit- Birch Bluff Road
Director Nielsen explained an encroachment agreement had been prepared by the City Attorney
regarding a request for a right-of-way permit for Dan and Melissa Nelson regarding property on Birch
Bluff Road. He stated there were two properties currently encroaching on the Second Avenue right-of-
way including a driveway to the east and a retaining wall to the west. He noted the agreement noted
stipulations regarding corrections to a retaining wall. Director Nielsen noted issues of concern were still
being discussed with the Nelsons', including how best to position a twelve-foot-wide driveway in the
limited 22 feet available for construction of that driveway.
.
Mayor Love questioned how many memorial (i.e., old) trees were to be impacted with the potential
manhole and curb cut slated for the access to the property.
Greg Buckley, 25885 Birch Bluff Road, submitted a letter into the record for Council review, noting his
concerns for fiduciary responsibility of his retaining wall, projected tree loss for the potential project,
stormwater runoff plan, and safety of his children related to the height and length of the retaining walls
required near the proposed driveway.
Carrie Dorfman, 25845 Birch Bluff Road, requested information on City policy regarding remuneration
should any items on her property be destroyed or damaged as a result of the construction issues
associated with the Nelsons' proposal. Attorney Keane stated the agreement would hold the applicant
responsible for any damage, and noted it would seem prudent to consider negotiating the value of the
memorial trees on her property that could be in jeopardy as a result of any construction on the applicant's
site.
In response to Mayor Love's questions on drainage and retaining wall safety issues, Engineer Brown
stated the topography and runoff flowed downhill, and the proposed driveway would need to be
constructed lower than the surrounding area and thus, would act as a catch basin of sorts to direct water
flow to an appropriate outlet. He also stated the retaining wall would need a guard rail if it's height was
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Page 4 of6
,/
over four feet. He noted with the potential safety hazards of having children in the area; he encouraged
the applicants to put a guardrail atop the proposed retaining wall.
Dan Nelson, applicant, stated he would prefer two shorter retaining walls along the driveway area versus
one wall as the condition of the current wall was quite unique. He also stated the height of the retaining
wall proposed varied near four feet. He stated his plans attempted to have construction as close to the
retaining wall, and as far away from the memorial oak tree in the area of the driveway, as possible.
In response to Councilmember Turgeon's questions, Engineer Brown explained the construction plans
were pushing all constraints associated with the property, and he anticipated construction to be difficult.
He believed constructed plans presented thus far could be constructed, however the technical items had
not yet been approved as part of the planning process for this project.
Discussion ensued regarding the indemnification aspects should damage occur to the trees and
surrounding properties during construction. Further discussion ensued regarding the encroachment
issues and associated implications from this action on the City's behalf.
Mr. Nelson stated without access to the property, the official purchase of this property would not be
taking place, thus, the request was being made at this time.
.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she thought it imperative issues such as this one be placed on the
Planning Commission Agenda for consideration and recommendation prior to Council taking action.
Councilmember Garfunkel noted if the City had historically granted requests such as this one, and the
City was legally protected from damages incurred as a result of construction to the properties in the area,
it seemed as though the issues presented this evening requiring resolution could be found between the
private parties involved in the project and adjoining neighbors.
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Encroachment Agreement for 26075 Birch Bluff
Road, subject to Engineering, and Planning Staff Recommendations, and a maintenance
agreement be utilized for the sanitary sewer.
Motion passed 4/0.
.
B. City Hall Assessment Report
Administrator Dawson explained Bill Baxley of the BKV Group was present this evening to briefly
review and present the City Hall Space Needs Assessment Report. Mr. Baxley briefly reviewed four
options available to the City for consideration of appropriate space needs for City Hall into the future.
He stated very rough cost estimates had been provided, including "soft costs" in effort to provide
consideration of the magnitude of the four scenarios shared as Council began to consider viability of City
Hall in future years.
Councilmember Zerby stated he would like to see inclusion of a scenario that included complete
construction of a new facility in the vicinity of the Public Works site. Mayor Love agreed this scenario
might need to be added at a later date should Council agree a new facility would be the best option to
proceed. However, it was important to request and receive information regarding the imminence of
environmental concerns currently associated with the present building.
"
.
.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Page 5 of6
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Hall Space Needs Assessment Report.
Motion passed 4/0.
C. 2004 Work Plan/Goals and Priorities
Administrator Dawson briefly reviewed the 2004 Work Plan and related Goals and Priorities for Council.
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the 2004 Work Plan. Motion passed 4/0.
D. Endorsements for Appointments to MCWD Board of Managers
Mayor Love noted that given the County's action scheduled tomorrow, Council would not be able to
make a fully informed recommendation for appointments of the Board of Managers for the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District.
E.
Building Code Ordinance
Director Nielsen explained the City Code was being updated through Ordinance to include the
International Building Code, and would also adopt the Minnesota Fire Code requirements.
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 400. "An Ordinance Amending
Chapter 1001 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Adoption of the Minnesota State Building
Code." Motion passed 4/0.
10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
None.
11. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS
A.
Administrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Intersection
Administrator Dawson stated the County Road 19 Intersection Project was moving forward appropriately
with construction being currently planned by representatives of Hennepin County in spring of this year.
He noted the project was contingent upon gaining right-of-way for the project. Engineer Brown noted
the engineering design and landscape documents were nearing completion as the project moved forward.
2. Public Safety Facilities
Administrator Dawson stated the West Side Public Safety Facility was occupied and the East Side
Facility was experience a slight delay due to the cold weather.
Administrator Dawson congra!lllated Finance Director Burton and Staff for a job well done in receiving
the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Page 6 of6
f
B. Mayor & City Council
Mayor Love reported he had recently been interviewed regarding the recent actions of the four city
councils associated with the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department budget.
Mayor Love recessed the Regular City Council Meeting to Executive Session at 8:32 P.M.
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Love convened the Executive Session at 8:33 P.M. Council, Attorney Keane, Administrator
Dawson, and Planning Director Nielsen were present to discuss information related to litigation filed by
Minnetonka Moorings, Inc.
Mayor Love recessed the Executive Session Meeting to return to Regular City Council Meeting at 8:48
P.M.
13.
ADJOURN
.
Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of February
9,2004, at 8:49 P.M. Motion passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULLYSUBNUTTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recordine Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
.
.'
PAYABLESAPPROVALS
For 2/23/04 Council Meeting
.
Prepared by: (lIltA/;11/Y/; IlLI ,
Catherine EIke, Sr. Accountant
~~
Reviewed by:
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director
Approved by: ~ &u<0>0 I /:0
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
.
Date: 2- /9--u,-/
Date: ~r/o'l
/
Date:
#t9/o1
.'
#3/}
Check Approval List for 2/23/04 Sorted by Department
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
36904 ADVANCED IMAGING SO 2/12/2004 15643 $176.89
36905 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 FEB UNION DUES 2/12/2004 $198.10
36906 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 2/10/04 PK COMM MTG 2/12/2004 $150.00
36907 AUDIO COMMUNICATIO PORTABLE RADIOSlCHA 2/12/2004 65752 $863.08
36908 CULLIGAN BOTTLED W A 2/12/2004 114X2868 $18.67
36909 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRI 1 ST QTR SVCS 2/12/2004 $55,610.57
36909 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRI 1 ST QTR SVCS 2/12/2004 $60,421.72
36911 FRIENDS SO. SHORE SR PLAN COMM MTG 3/9/04 2/12/2004 030904 $50.00
36912 G & K SERVICES 2/12/2004 013004 $518.85
36913 GARY'S DIESEL SERVIC REPRS 89 FORD L7oo0 2.112/2004 62229 $892.07
36914 GATHERINGS AT EXCEL FLOWERS-SUE L.NERA 2/12/2004 348 $96.92
36916 ICMA RETIREMENT TRU PAYROLL DEDUCTS 2/10/ 2/12/2004 302131-02 $1,190.68
36917 KEEFE,SALLY JAN CONTRACT SVCS 2/12/2004 $405.00
36917 KEEFE, SALLY JAN CONTRACT SVCS 2/12/2004 $350.00
36918 KINKO'S DOG WASTE SIGNS-PAR 2/12/2004 62100042 $86.00
36919 LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH SEC 125 REIMBURSEME 2/12/2004 $976.31
36920 MENARDS SHELVES/HDWE 2/12/2004 1057 $70.21
36922 MN CHILD SUPPORT PM CHILD SUPPORT - C SCH 2/12/2004 $193.35
36923 MN SUN PUBLICATIONS VARIANCE. J. MARSO 2/12/2004 663488 $46.47
36925 NGUYEN, MICHELLE TUITION REIMBURSEME 2/12/2004 $163.80
36926 O'ROURKE WELDING CYLINDER RENTAL 2/12/2004 $10.00
36927 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV JANlFEB SVC 2/12/2004 $266.25
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26-2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $18.70
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26.2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $42.75
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26.2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $3.73
36929 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 2 2/12/2004 762400-02 $2,486.82
36929 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 2 2/12/2004 762400-02 $2,696.49
36930 POMMER COMPANY, IN 2/12/2004 51107 $65.11
36930 POMMER COMPANY, IN 2/12/2004 51122 $29.63
36931 POTTS, KENNETH N. JAN PROSECUTONS 2/12/2004 020404 $1,708.33
36933 SATELLITE SHELTERS,I WALL HEATER 2/12/2004 24314401 $262.70
36935 UNIVERSITY OF MINNES TREE COURSE REG FEE 2/12/2004 $260.00
36936 WASTE MANAGEMENT FEB SVC 2/12/2004 0715488.1 $232.14
36940 BURTON, BONNIE MGFOA MTG EXP/MILEA 2/19/2004 $38.37
36941 DAWSON, CRAIG JAN EXP/MILEAGE 2/1912004 $45.75
36942 DEPT OF LABOR & INDU BOILER REG FEE 2/19/2004 B42 351 R $10.00
36946 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES I WORK COMP INS ADJ-2O 2/19/2004 2927 $174.00
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $85.02
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $70.38
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304C ($39.22)
36952 SBC PAGING 2/19/2004 52006802 $25.75
36953 SENIOR COMMUNITY SE 2004S0UTHSHORECTR 2/19/2004 020404 $6,000.00
36954 US POSTMASTER PSTG MARCH NEWSLET 2/19/2004 $519.12
36955 WM. MUELLER & SONS, I BANK FILL 2/19/2004 88290 $531.12
36955 WM. MUELLER & SONS, I CONCRETE SAND 2/19/2004 88599 $1,682.86
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0208-203- $7.16
36957 XCELENERGY 2/19/2004 0326-600- $33.80
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 1541-203- $179.24
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 2052.902- $13.49
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 2095-300- $1,520.82
36960 BERRY COFFEE CO 2/24/2004 3974n $23.00
36960 BERRY COFFEE CO 2/24/2004 397478 $33.75
.
.
~~~~~~r2Ai~~;;;-li.~..m~..;;.~~,';t,~;;rIi'i!.i.::t~
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 1 0/5
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
36964 FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 030104 $85.50
36972 MIDWEST MAILING SYS FEB NEWSLETTER 2/24/2004 57324 $336.88
36974 MORTON SALT ROAD SALT 2/24/2004 845113 $2,176.20
36975 OFFICE DEPOT 2/24/2004 23117788 $274.14
36976 ORONO, CITY OF ANIMAL CONTROL 2/24/2004 20040023 $1,626.45
36981 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TO PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 0296876-0 $286.55
36986 XCEL ENERGY 2/24/2004 1732-704- $2,382.81
36987 ZIEGLER, INC. CUTTING EDGES-PLOWS 2/24/2004 PCOO0670 $759.50
36987 ZIEGLER, INC. CUTTING EDGES-PLOWS 2/24/2004 PCOOO670 $931.72
TOTAL FOR 101 GENERAL FUND $150,375.50
36979 TECHIES FEB SVC 2/24/2004 174060 $500.00
TOTALFOR 401 PUBliC FACIliTIES/OFFICE EQUIPMENT $500.00
36903 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUP UTILITY TRK FLATBED,C 2/12/2004 073015-00 $38,859.72
36903 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUP IDLE CONTROL-UTILITY T 2/12/2004 074200-00 $714.79
TOTAL FOR 403 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $39,634.51
36902 JOHANNSEN,RYAN REF WATER CONNECTIO 2/12/2004 $10,000.00
36950 QWEST 2/19/2004 $261.99
. 36950 QWEST 2/19/2004 $99.05
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0234-748- $8.02
36957 XCELENERGY 2/19/2004 1351-508- $578.63
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 1692-607- $119.35
36967 HACH COMPANY WATER CHEMICALS 2/24/2004 3736650 $88.83
36982 VESSCO, INC. WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 2/24/2004 30487 $130.94
36986 XCEL ENERGY 2/24/2004 1716-835- $83.23
TOTAL FOR 601 WATER UTIUTY $11,370.04
36924 MPCA WASTEWATER CERT EX 2/12/2004 031104 $32.00
36937 AMERICAN ENGINEERIN LIFT ST 8 REHAB 2/19/2004 25464 $2,190.00
36939 BRAUN PUMP & CONTR LIFT STATION REPRS 2/1912004 6537 $828.00
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0074-000- $8.06
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0191-308- $21.33
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0640-202- $16.00
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0675-505- $17.36
. 36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 0942-567- $33.13
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 1350-001- $42.44
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 1641-408- $51.22
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 2325-902- $26.79
36957 XCEL ENERGY 2/19/2004 2397-003- $15.22
36971 METRO COUNCIL ENVIR MARCH WASTEWATER 2/24/2004 769289 $31,476.60
TOTAL FOR 611 SANITARY SEWER UTILITY $34,758.15
36943 E-Z RECYCLING INC. FEB SVC 2/19/2004 6213 $6,472.80
TOTALFOR 621 RECYCUNG UTIUTY $6,472.80
36915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 452375 ($3.34)
36915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 454307 $301.98
36915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 454307 $95.48
36921 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 2/12/2004 83203156 $92.60
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $21.16
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $1,164.26
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $194.04
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 366004-00 $704.43
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELLlEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $33.99
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $36.85
i!J~~:.":'t::;"ti!21f.~~!:i!~~&~m'!!;!2.~M.\1:ilC.wJSm~~.n."A2'~~%1.'.:~~~t..~,t.':':!!:Y.ii~_"i~?~JF~~~~~~2~~
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 2 of 5
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/1212004 013104 $58.56
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $20.00
36936 WASTE MANAGEMENT FEB SVC 2/12/2004 0715487.1 $116.73
36938 ARCTIC GLACIER INC 2/1912004 46340400 $18.36
36947 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13363/94 $81.95
36947 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13363/94 $81.95
36948 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 2/19/2004 59449164 $70.80
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 365990-00 ($29.32)
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368672-00 $734.64
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368693-00 $1,721.19
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $16.44
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $46.99
36956 WORLD CLASS WINES, I 2/19/2004 146415 $181.00
36958 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 2/24/2004 38041200 $14.97
36958 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 2/24/2004 38062700 $5.98
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28558500 $1,233.95
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28618100 $2,332.30
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28618100 $1,144.00
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 251097 $407.30
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 251901 $n2.3O .
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 251901 $19.80
36962 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 221472 $2,2n.80
36962 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 221543 $1,331.75
36963 EXTREME BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 180033 $32.00
36964 FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 030104 $11.25
36965 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN 2/24/2004 61484 $226.00
36965 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN 2/2412004 61643 $314.00
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 631627 ($19.67)
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840094 $178.75
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840357 $41.n
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840357 $621.30
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/2412004 843193 $3,269.63
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/2412004 843225 $1,217.86
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 16740n $871.90
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 16740n $15.99
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 16740n $1,537.27
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 1676991 $1,510.04 .
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 1676991 $568.25
36970 MARK VII 2/24/2004 629527 $2,907.70
36970 MARK VII 2/24/2004 631799 $373.00
36973 MILBERTS LOCK & SAF INSTALL PANIC HDWE-#2 2/24/2004 04.15200 $422.20
369n PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8026346 ($18.00)
369n PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027270 $859.33
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027302 $160.00
369n PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027472 ($15.00)
369n PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027489 ($130.20)
369n PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027490 ($88.00)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034935 $604.50
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034935 $60.50
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034935 $721.60
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2037168 $473.85
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2037168 $87.72
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292357 ($6.20)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292421 ($107.60)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292422 ($3.44)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292423 ($8.57)
!$m1.l'I:!t\i1lZ!~~Rr:1~)U'~~~-~~~~~!r-S=-"3l'~Imm':l'~~lf~~~f:. V~~I6~~{';' --_.~~~
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 3 of 5
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292424 ($15.17)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292425 ($17.94)
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 323705 $1,727.30
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324429 $618.99
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324429 $13.45
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324458 $17.00
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324458 $26.25
36981 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TD PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 0296876-0 $25.91
36984 WINE MERCHANTS 2/24/2004 89993 $488.15
36985 WORLD CLASS WINES, I 2/24/2004 146432 $126.00
TOTAL FOR 641 SHORE WOOD PLAZA liQUOR $35,000.56
36910 EXTREME BEVERAGE 2/12/2004 178383 $32.00
36915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 454306 $46.99
36915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 454306 $381.04
36921 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 2/12/2004 83203131 $98.00
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $25.30
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $363.35
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $853.49
. 36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 366003-00 $174.14
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $33.99
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $19.99
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $36.85
36938 ARCTIC GLACIER INC 2/19/2004 46340400 $18.36
36944 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/19/2004 221414 $1,773.65
36944 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/19/2004 221414 $10.40
36945 HOHENSTEINS INC 2/19/2004 324064 $47.90
36947 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13362/93 $68.40
36947 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13362/93 $68.40
36948 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 2/19/2004 59449144 $28.80
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 366016-00 ($16.00)
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368671-00 $497.22
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368692-00 $190.00
36949 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368692-00 $585.66
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $16.45
36951 SAM'S CLUB 2/19/2004 020304 $46.99
. 36958 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 2/24/2004 38041100 $85.25
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28558600 $664.85
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28558600 $72.00
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/24/2004 28617900 $646.50
36959 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 2/2412004 28617900 $54.00
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 251096 $568.50
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/2412004 251899 $135.10
36961 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 251899 $16.90
36962 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 221469 $31.20
36962 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 221469 $1,447.10
36964 FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 030104 $6.75
36965 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN 2/24/2004 61642 $153.00
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840096 $539.52
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840359 $615.78
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843194 $66.50
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843194 $1,150.15
36966 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843226 $436.65
36968 HONEYWELL ALARM MONITORING 2/24/2004 2728031 $223.65
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 1674076 $1,137.60
36969 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 2/24/2004 1674076 $1.361.19
~'!!m"~.zftiD:~~~~~~:~~:..~~~'U,~a;:t'..::~~r'~-y..J.;;t;~I'JI,~,fi4~:~'~<<~~~~;\"1~;n~-~Ir~'Y"~.s-.;Bm%;II~>>:~1Il!i
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 40f5
Check # Vendor Name
36969
36969
36969
36970
36970
36970
369n
369n
36978
36978
36978
36978
36978
36978
36978
36978
36978
36980
36980
36980
36981
36983
36984
36984
Description
JOHNSON BROS L1auo
JOHNSON BROS L1auo
JOHNSON BROS L1auo
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN
PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TO PREM-MAR
WINE COMPANY (THE)
WINE MERCHANTS
WINE MERCHANTS
TOTAL FOR 642 WATERFORD UQUOR
TOTAL CHECKS
Check Date Invoice #
~4/2004 1676990
2/24/2004 1676990
2/24/2004 242351
2/24/2004 629534
2/24/2004 631808
2/24/2004 631809
2/24/2004 8027271
2/24/2004 8027271
2/24/2004 2034934
2/24/2004 2034934
~4/2004 2034934
2/24/2004 2037167
2/24/2004 2037167
~4/2OO4 3292582
~4/2OO4 3292698
~4/2OO4 3292699
2/24/2004 3292700
2/24/2004 323704
~4/2oo4 323704
2/24/2004 324427
2/24/2004 0296876-0
2/24/2004 21276-00
~4/2OO4 89548
2/24/2004 89992
Amount
$139.65
$1,207.58
($220.49)
$1,343.40
$726.80
$98.00
$42.00
$186.00
$n9.08
$782.90
$161.25
$172.68
$53.75
($6.00)
($3.62)
($5.60)
($3.88)
$2,204.98
$26.30
$1,844.60
$19.01
$160.00
$580.00
$496.50
$25,598.45
.
$303,710.01
.
nm~ilFEmi1i~~~~.L~~..~~~:n&-;'~~~~~l1'..'"~~~~~~.aJm:.~l!i'Y..~~l~.:lW.~;~t"~~m.m
Thursday, February 19,2004 Page 5of5
Check Approval List for 2/23/04 Council Meeting
Description
Check Date Invoice #
36902
Check # Vendor Name
2/12/2004
36903
36903
36904
36905
36906
36907
36908
.
36909
36909
36910
36911
36912
36913
36914
.
36915
36915
36915
36915
36915
36916
36917
36917
36918
36919
36920
36921
JOHANNSEN, RYAN REF WATER CONNECTIO
TOTAL FOR JOHANNSEN, RYAN
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUP UTILITY TRK FLATBED,C 2/12/2004 073015-00
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUP IDLE CONTROL-UTILITY T 2/12/2004 074200-00
TOTAL FOR ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
ADVANCED IMAGING SO 2/12/2004 15643
TOTAL FOR ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC
AFSCME COUNCIL 14 FEB UNION DUES 2/12/2004
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14
ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 2/1.0/04 PK COMM MTG
TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B.
AUDIO COMMUNICATIO PORTABLE RADIOS/CHA
TOTAL FOR AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
CULLIGAN BOTTLED W A 2/12/20.04 114X2868
TOTAL FOR CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRI 1ST QTR SVCS 2/12/2004
EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRI 1ST QTR SVCS 2/12/20.04
TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT
EXTREME BEVERAGE
TOTAL FOR EXTREME BEVERAGE
FRIENDS SO. SHORE SR PLAN COMM MTG 319/.04 2/12/20.04 .030904
TOTAL FOR FRIENDS SO. SHORE SR CTR
G & K SERVICES 2/12/20.04 .013004
TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES
GARY'S DIESEL SERVIC REPRS 89 FORD L7.o.o.o 2/12/20.04 62229
TOTAL FOR GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE 1NC
GATHERINGS AT EXCEL FLOWERS-SUE LNERA 2/12/2004 348
TOTAL FOR GATHERINGS AT EXCELSIOR FLORIS
HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/20.04 452375
HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/20.04 454306
HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 454306
HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2004 4543.07
HERMEL WHOLESALE 2/12/2.0.04 4543.07
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE
ICMA RETIREMENTTRU PAYROLL DEDUCTS 2/1.0/ 2/12/20.04 3.02131-.02
TOTAL FOR 1CMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
JAN CONTRACT SVCS 2/12/2.0.04
JAN CONTRACT SVCS 2/12/2.0.04
TOTAL FOR KEEFE, SALLY
DOG WASTE SIGNS-PAR
TOTAL FOR KlNKO'S
LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH SEC 125 REIMBURSEME
TOTAL FOR LUGOWSKl, JOSEPH
SHELVES/HOWE
TOTAL FOR MENARDS
MIDWEST COCA-COLA B
Amount
$1.0,.000.00
$10,000.00
$38,859.72
$774.79
$39,634.51
$176.89
$176.89
$198.1.0
$198.10
$15.0..0.0
$150.00
$863..08
$863.08
$18.67
$18.67
$55,61.0.57
$6.0,421.72
$116,032.29
$32.0.0
$32.00
$50.00
$50.00
$518.85
$518.85
$892..07
$892.07
$96.92
$96.92
($3.34)
$46.99
$381..04
$95.48
$3.01.98
$822.15
$1,190.68
$1,190.68
$35.0.00
$4.05..0.0
$755.00
$86..0.0
$86.00
$976.31
$976.31
$7.0.21
$70.21
$98.00
~E;'lm"'i;raJ$m.~~::'iL~~;ff.r:!.:."'5i'i.~~~f.~'!i'h.'.\m~~.alX'if~m.n:;'::,m'r!rnii;ID;~m::ra'_\t'i:iZ;:i'tlW,.;,~;j!i1i;:~~~~a~~~r~~~.!F-;~m~'Di1!UXt'tl!i1t.ti.Di.m~']J1t.
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 1 of7
2/12/2004
2/12/2004 65752
2/12/2.0.04 178383
KEEFE,SALLY
KEEFE, SALLY
KINKO'S
2/12/2.0.04 621.0.0042
2/12/20.04
MENARDS
2/12/2.004 1.057
2/12/2.0.04 832.03131
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
36921 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 2/12/2004 83203156 $92.60
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $190.60
36922 MN CHILD SUPPORT PM CHILD SUPPORT. C SCH 2/12/2004 $193.35
TOTAL FOR MN CHIW SUPPORT PMT CTR $193.35
36923 MN SUN PUBLICATIONS VARIANCE- J. MARSO 2/12/2004 663488 $46.47
TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBUCATIONS $46.47
36924 MPCA WASTEWATER CERT EX 2/12/2004 031104 $32.00
TOTAL FOR MPCA $32.00
36925 NGUYEN, MICHELLE TUITION REIMBURSEME 2/12/2004 $163.80
TOTAL FOR NGUYEN, MICHELLE $163.80
36926 O'ROURKE WELDING CYLINDER RENTAL 2/12/2004 $10.00
TOTAL FOR O'ROURKE WEWING $10.00
36927 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV JAN/FEB SVC 2/12/2004 $266.25
TOTAL FOR PAWS, CLA WS & HOOVES PET $266.25
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26-2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $3.73
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26-2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $18.70
36928 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 1/26-2/6/04 MILEAGElEXP 2/12/2004 $42.75
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $65.18
36929 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 2 2/12/2004 762400-02 $2,486.82
36929 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 2 2/12/2004 762400-02 $2,696.49
TOTAL FOR PERA $5,183.31
36930 POMMER COMPANY, IN 2/12/2004 51107 $65.11
36930 POMMER COMPANY, IN 2/12/2004 51122 $29.63
TOTAL FOR POMMER COMPANY, INC. $94.74
36931 POTTS, KENNETH N. JAN PROSECUTONS 2/12/2004 020404 $1,708.33
TOTAL FOR POTTS, KENNETH N. $1,708.33
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $25.30
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $363.35
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365969-00 $853.49
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $21.16
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $194.04
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 365970-00 $1,164.26
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 366003-00 $174.14
36932 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/12/2004 366004-00 $704.43
TOTAL FOR QUAUTY WINE & SPIRITS CO $3,500.17
36933 SATELLITE SHELTERS, I WALL HEATER 2/12/2004 24314401 $262.70
TOTAL FOR SATELUTE SHELTERS, INC $262.70
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELLlEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $36.85
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $36.85
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $58.56
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $33.99
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $20.00
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELLlEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $19.99
36934 SWANDBY, DONALD JAN MILEAGElCELUEXP 2/12/2004 013104 $33.99
TOTAL FOR SWANDBY, DONAW $240.23
36935 UNIVERSITY OF MINNES TREE COURSE REG FEE 2/12/2004 $260.00
TOTAL FOR UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $260.00
36936 WASTE MANAGEMENT FEB SVC 2/12/2004 0715487-1 $116.73
36936 WASTE MANAGEMENT FEB SVC 2/12/2004 0715488-1 $232.14
TOTAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT $348.87
36937 AMERICAN ENGINEERIN LIFT ST 8 REHAB 2/19/2004 25464 $2,190.00
.
.
t.~t~&~Q'.i.~!t;i,~~~'!.z..1l!.~~.tW-"i'J;;.~i%':iiila)EEi:f.mUtlti;~1:'r:i:~7~~~.i\t~~~~\!"."?..l~~~-.\:~
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 20/7
Check # Vendor Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
Amount
36938
36938
36939
36940
36941
36942
36943
36944
36944
.
36945
36946
36947
36947
36947
36947.
36948
36948
.
36949
36949
36949
36949
36949
36949
36949
36950
36950
36951
36951
36951
36951
36951
36951
36951
36952
36953
TOTAL FOR AMERICAN ENGINEERING
ARCTIC GLACIER INC 2/19/2004 46340400
ARCTIC GLACIER INC 2/19/2004 46340400
TOTAL FOR ARCTIC GLACIER INC
BRAUN PUMP & CONTR LIFT STATION REPRS 2/19/2004 6537
TOTAL FOR BRAUN PUMP & CONTROLS
BURTON, BONNIE MGFOA MTG EXPIMILEA 2/19/2004
TOTAL FOR BURTON, BONNIE
DAWSON, CRAIG JAN EXP/MILEAGE 2/19/2004
TOTAL FOR DA WSON, CRAIG
DEPT OF LABOR & INDU BOILER REG FEE 2/1912004 B42351R
TOTAL FOR DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
E.Z RECYCLING INC. FEB SVC 2/19/2004 6213
TOTAL FOR E-Z RECYCLING INC.
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/19/2004 221414
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2/19/2004 221414
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN
HOHENSTEINS INC 2/19/2004 324064
TOTAL FOR HOHENSTEINS INC
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES I WORK COMP INS ADJ-20 2/19/2004 2927
TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T
MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13362/93
MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13362/93
MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13363/94
MARLIN'S TRUCKING 2/19/2004 13363/94
TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING
PEPSI COLA COMPANY 2/19/2004 59449144
PEPSI COLA COMPANY 2/19/2004 59449164
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 365990-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 366016-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368671-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368672-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368692-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368692-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 2/19/2004 368693-00
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
QWEST 2/19/2004
QWEST 2/19/2004
TOTAL FOR QWEST
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
SAM'S CLUB
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304
2/19/2004 020304C
$2,190.00
$18.36
$18.36
$36.72
$828.00
$828.00
$38.37
$38.37
$45.75
$45.75
$10.00
$10.00
$6,472.80
$6,472.80
$10.40
$1,n3.65
$1,784.05
$47.90
$47.90
$174.00
$174.00
$68.40
$68.40
$81.95
$81.95
$300.70
$28.80
$70.80
$99.60
($29.32)
($16.00)
$497.22
$734.64
$190.00
$585.66
$1,721.19
$3,683.39
$99.05
$261.99
$361.04
$16.44
$16.45
$46.99
$46.99
$70.38
$85.02
($39.22)
$243.05
$25.75
$25.75
$6,000.00
~"""iA.w~m;r-'il<;-'0~r1.;r~2r!"E4!Z'?~'::"','I;W:"""~-~-'\':"J\.'~~,~.~~'"E~~:ili.1'MI1IiW"'~Y~Sf_:~'~~','If"~~;m.1~m!lt.fta:"1.ua2~11iaS:l!&,~~~~~~..:~.~~~
Thu;;dliy, F ebr~~ry 19~2iiii4 - - .. - . "".. - . . _.' _. .. Page3 of 7
TOTAL FOR SAM'S CLUB
SBC PAGING
2/19/2004 52006802
TOTAL FOR SBC PAGING
SENIOR COMMUNITY SE 2004 SOUTHSHORE CTR
2/1912004 020404
Check # Vendor Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
36954
Amount
36955
36955
36956
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36957
36958
36958
36958
36959
36959
36959
36959
36959
36959
36959
36960
36960
36961
36961
36961
36961
36961
36961
36962
36962
36962
36962
TOTAL FOR SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
US POSTMASTER PSTG MARCH NEWSLET 2/19/2004
TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER
WM. MUELLER & SONS, I BANK FILL 2/19/2004 88290
WM. MUELLER & SONS, I CONCRETE SAND 2/19/2004 88599
TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC.
WORLD CLASS WINES, I 2/19/2004 146415
TOTAL FOR WORLD CLASS WINES, INC
XCELENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
2/19/2004 0074-000-
2/19/2004 0191-308-
2/19/2004 0208-203-
2/19/2004 0234-748-
2/19/2004 0326-600-
2/19/2004 0640-202-
2/19/2004 0675-505-
2/19/2004 0942-567-
2/19/2004 1350-001-
2/19/2004 1351-508-
2/19/2004 1541-203-
2/19/2004 1641-408-
2/19/2004 1692-607-
2/19/2004 2052-902-
2/19/2004 2095-300-
2/19/2004 2325-902-
2/19/2004 2397-003-
$6,000.00
$519.12
$519.12
$531.12
$1,682.86
$2,213.98
$181.00
$181.00
$8.06
$21.33
$7.16
$8.02
$33.80
$16.00
$17.36
$33.13
$42.44
$578.63
$179.24
$51.22
$119.35
$13.49
$1,520.82
$26.79
$15.22
$2,692.06
$85.25
$14.97
$5.98
$106.20
$1,233.95
$72.00
$664.85
$54.00
$646.50
$1,144.00
$2,332.30
$6,147.60
$23.00
$33.75
$56.75
$568.50
$407.30
$16.90
$135.10
$19.80
$n2.3O
$1,919.90
$31.20
$1,447.10
$2,2n.8O
$1.331.75
.
.
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY
BELLBOY CORPORA TIO
BELLBOY CORPORA TIO
BELLBOY CORPORATIO
BELLBOY CORPORATlO
BELLBOY CORPORATIO
BELLBOY CORPORATIO
BELLBOY CORPORATIO
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION
BERRY COFFEE CO
BERRY COFFEE CO
TOTAL FOR BERRY COFFEE CO
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
2/24/2004 38041100
2/24/2004 38041200
2/24/2004 38062700
2/24/2004 28558500
2/24/2004 28558600
2/24/2004 28558600
2/24/2004 28617900
2/24/2004 28617900
2/24/2004 28618100
2/24/2004 28618100
2/24/2004 3974n
2/24/2004 397478
2/24/2004 251096
2/24/2004 251097
2/24/2004 251899
2/24/2004 251899
2/24/2004 251901
2/24/2004 251901
2/24/2004 221469
2/24/2004 221469
2/24/2004 221472
2/24/2004 221543
~~~...:s:--m~~'3ml':i~~~t:i'~~~~~~~'_~~..!~~.m~~~~'%1''ft~~-M~
Thursday, February 19, 2004 Page 40f7
Check# Vendor Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
Amount
36963
36964
36964
36964
36965
36965
36965
.
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36966
36967
36968
.
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36969
36970
36970
36970
36970
36970
36971
36972
36973
36974
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN
EXTREME BEVERAGE 2/24/2004 180033
TOTAL FOR EXTREME BEVERAGE
FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM-MAR
FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM.MAR
FORTIS BENEFITS INS C STD PREM.MAR
TOTAL FOR FORTIS BENEFITS INS CO
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN
GRAPE BEGINNINGS-iN
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN
TOTAL FOR GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 631627
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840094
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840096
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840357
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840357
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 840359
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843193
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843194
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843194
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843225
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 2/24/2004 843226
TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
HACH COMPANY WATER CHEMICALS 2/24/2004 3736650
TOTAL FOR BACH COMPANY
ALARM MONITORING
TOTAL FOR HONEYWEU
JOHNSON BROS UOUO 2/24/2004 1674076
JOHNSON BROS LIOUO 2/24/2004 1674076
JOHNSON BROS L1auo 2/24/2004 16740n
JOHNSON BROS L10UO 2/2412004 16740n
JOHNSON BROS uauo 2/24/2004 16740n
JOHNSON BROS LIOUO 2/2412004 1676990
JOHNSON BROS L1auo 2/24/2004 1676990
JOHNSON BROS L10UO 2/24/2004 1676991
JOHNSON BROS L1auo 2/2412004 1676991
JOHNSON BROS L1auo 2/24/2004 242351
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS liQUOR CO.
2/24/2004 629527
2/24/2004 629534
2/24/2004 631799
2/24/2004 631808
2/24/2004 631809
2/24/2004 030104
2/24/2004 030104
2/24/2004 030104
2/24/2004 61484
2/2412004 61642
2/24/2004 61643
HONEYWELL
2/24/2004 2728031
$5,087.85
$32.00
$32.00
$85.50
$6.75
$11.25
$103.50
$226.00
$153.00
$314.00
$693.00
($19.67)
$178.75
$539.52
$41.n
$621.30
$615.78
$3,269.63
$66.50
$1,150.15
$1,217.86
$436.65
$8,118.24
$88.83
$88.83
$223.65
$223.65
$1,137.60
$1,361.19
$15.99
$871.90
$1,537.27
$139.65
$1,207.58
$568.25
$1,510.04
($220.49)
$8,128.98
$2,907.70
$1,343.40
$373.00
$726.80
$98.00
$5,448.90
$31,476.60
$31,476.60
$336.88
$336.88
$422.20
$422.20
$2,176.20
5.~':$Amj/~i~.::.f~$Z~;.~m~~N!!t;~~~'i't~.1Ol'E;;(A~:~~~!tl!~I!lI.'.:;{i;W'.i.~~~~~~~~.\:\::ir:,~-
Thursda.v, February 19, 2004 Page 5 0/7
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
TOTAL FOR MARKVIl
METRO COUNCIL ENVIR MARCH W ASTEWA TER 2/24/2004 769289
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT
MIDWEST MAILING SYS FEB NEWSLETTER 2/24/2004 57324
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC
MILBERT'S LOCK & SAF INSTALL PANIC HDWE-#2 2/24/2004 04-15200
TOTAL FOR MILBERT'S WCK & SAFE CO
MORTON SALT ROAD SALT 2/24/2004 845113
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR MORTON SALT $2,176.20
36975 OFFICE DEPOT V24/2004 23117788 $274.14
TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $274.14
36976 ORONO, CITY OF ANIMAL CONTROL 2/24/2004 20040023 $1,626.45
TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF $1,626.45
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN V24/2004 8026346 ($18.00)
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027270 $859.33
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027271 $42.00
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027271 $186.00
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027302 $160.00
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN V24/2OO4 8027472 ($15.00)
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027489 ($130.20)
36977 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 2/24/2004 8027490 ($88.00)
TOTAL FOR PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY $996.13
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034934 $161.25
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034934 $779.08
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT V24/2OO4 2034934 $782.90
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034935 $60.50
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2034935 $604.50 .
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/2412004 2034935 $721.60
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT V24/2OO4 2037167 $53.75
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2037167 $172.68
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2037168 $87.72
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 2037168 $473.85
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292357 ($6.20)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292421 ($107.60)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT V24/2OO4 3292422 ($3.44)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292423 ($8.57)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292424 ($15.17)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292425 ($17.94)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292582 ($6.00)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292698 ($3.62)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292699 ($5.60)
36978 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 2/24/2004 3292700 ($3.88)
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $3,719.81 .
36979 TECHIES FEB SVC 2/2412004 174060 $500.00
TOTAL FOR TECHIES $500.00
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 323704 $26.30
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 323704 $2,204.98
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 323705 $1,727.30
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324427 $1,844.60
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324429 $618.99
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324429 $13.45
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/24/2004 324458 $17.00
36980 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 2/2412004 324458 $26.25
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $6,478.87
36981 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TD PREM.MAR 2/24/2004 0296876-0 $19.01
36981 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TO PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 0296876-0 $25.91
36981 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE L TD PREM-MAR 2/24/2004 0296876-0 $286.55
TOTAL FOR UNUM UFE INSURANCE CO $331.47
36982 VESSCO, INC. WATER OEPT SUPPLIES 2/24/2004 30487 $130.94
TOTAL FOR VESSCO, INC. $130.94
36983 WINE COMPANY (THE) 2/24/2004 21276-00 $160.00
~M-l~X....~,,;,m;.:f.;!:f:.vmam.~~_llM3':,~,~~"~~~.i'.t'~~"&~~;,!..~~~~ .-
Thursdtly, February 19,2004 Page6of7
.
.
Check # Vendor Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
Amount
36984
36984
36984
36985
36986
36986
36987
36987
TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE)
WINE MERCHANTS
WINE MERCHANTS
WINE MERCHANTS
TOTAL FOR WINE MERCHANTS
WORLD CLASS WINES, I
TOTAL FOR WORW CLASS WINES, INC
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
ZIEGLER, INC.
ZIEGLER, INC.
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY
CUTTING EDGES-PLOWS
CUTTING EDGES-PLOWS
TOTAL FOR ZIEGLER, INC.
2/24/2004 89548
2/24/2004 89992
2/24/2004 89993
2/2412004 146432
2/24/2004 1732-704-
2/24/2004 1 n6.835.
2/24/2004 PC000670
2/24/2004 PCOOO670
$160.00
$580.00
$496.50
$488.15
$1,564.65
$126.00
$126.00
$2,382.81
$83.23
$2,466.04
$759.50
$931.72
$1,691.22
$303,710.D1
{'i<",,~~~~~','_~-;,;.~~~;Jl.iitii>;l!;-"'~5::'::":~'C"'::"~~"',:";~(""~'f',l'J;~m;,~~'~W~,~:F.1::!~'-,'~~;{'!!w'm~~':>Wr'\"~:~~"H:~~~~~~~~-~~
Tlzursday,''Febrilary'i 9,' 2004 ,_.< -, .-. . , - - - - ' .. -' - Page 70f7
TOTAL CHECKS
PAYROLL APPROV ALS
For 2/23/04 Council Meeting
/""J
"
Prepared by: {ff}ifll /I j~ ~
Catherine BIke, ~r. Affountant
Reviewed by: L-- ~
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director
Approved by: ~!t. ~ / M
Craig Daw~n, City Administrator
Date: r1-/9-of
.
Date: ~t:tlof
,
Date:~
.
Payroll Register
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
2600 BAILEY BOYD C 1,410.31 2/10/2004
2601 BURTON BONNIE M 1,785.91 2/10/2004
2602 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,229.30 2/10/2004
2603 EISCHENS JAMES E 907.70 2/10/2004
2604 EU<E CATHERINE M 967.28 2/10/2004
2605 FASCHING PATRICIA L 849.20 2/10/2004
2606 FIELD DALE F 706.74 2/10/2004
2607 GROUT TWILA R 922.31 2/10/2004
2608 HELLING PAMELA J 403.50 2/10/2004
2609 HIRSCH DANA M 170.43 2/1012004
2610 JOHNSON DENNIS D 1,149.26 2/1012004
2611 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,420.38 2/10/2004
2612 MASON BRADLEY J 1,070.31 2/1 0/2004
. 2613 MOORE JULIE K 251.96 2/1012004
2614 NGUYEN MICHELLE T 769.50 2/10/2004
2615 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,147.61 2/10/2004
2616 PANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,351.53 2/10/2004
2617 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,483.53 2/10/2004
2618 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,898.13 2/10/2004
2619 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 719.82 2/10/2004
2620 STARK BRUCE H 1,284.03 2/1012004
2621 SWANDBY DONALD R 1,376.86 2/1012004
2622 TOWER TERRY R 1,296.92 2/10/2004
218087 ARMSTRON MICHAEL R 336.27 2/1012004
218088 ARUNDEL JAMIE M 120.64 2/10/2004
218089 BROWN LAWRENCE A 2,063.46 2/10/2004
. 218090 DA VITCH JOSHUA R 177.62 2/10/2004
218091 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,942.71 2/10/2004
218092 DUFFY DAVID C 103.04 2/10/2004
218093 DUNDURS KATHLEEN C 137.35 2/10/2004
218094 FREIENMUT KERI J 148.32 2/10/2004
218095 GIESEN JON L 242.21 2/1012004
218096 GOTI'SCHAL JACOB S 113.50 2/10/2004
218097 GULSTRAND HANS R 84.07 2/1012004
218098 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 1,356.59 2/1012004
218099 LAUGHLIN BRANDON M 181.17 2/1012004
218100 LOCKWOOD DAVID C 48.20 2/1012004
218101 OLIVEIRA CHRISTOPHER L 189.83 2/10/2004
218102 PARENT MICHELLE L 468.73 2/10/2004
218103 SCHMIDT ALBERT J 46.99 2/10/2004
218104 SmLER MICHAEL K 113.50 2/1012004
Thursday, February 19,2004
Page 1 of2
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
218105 STEIN BENJAMIN E 118.85 2/10/2004
218106 THURSTON DOROTHY M 160.54 2/10/2004
218107 TICHY ROSS J 382.10 2/10/2004
Total of Checks $33,108.21
Thursday, February 19,2004
Page 2 of2
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 0 www.cLshorewood.mn.us ocityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council aD
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator .
February 19,2004
Resolution of Support for CDBG Application by WHAHL T
. Cities and organizations in the Hennepin County Consolidated Pool for the federal Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program have until March 5 to submit applications for the next
round of funding. There is approximately $500,000 available for the bulk. of communities in
Hennepin County. At the risk of oversimplification, the criteria for projects to be approved focus on
providing housing opportunities for residents with low and moderate incomes.
The'West HennepinAffordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) was organized in May, 2001, as an
effort to keep housing prices affordable in the area. WHAHL T acquires property (a vacant lot or
existing house) and re-sells it. Through purchase covenants, the buyer is limited in the price he/she
can subsequently sell the property. This . lower level of appreciation keeps the property affordable
through several subsequent buyers.
.
Application and Strategy: The city administrators of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, and Orono have had
discussions and developed information for WHAHL T to use in its application for CDBG funding. It
is difficult to be able to make much headway in providing affordable/life-cycle housing in the three
cities, given the high and rapidly appreciating property values. The propertY values in these cities are
high compared to projects WHAHLT has undertaken in closer-in suburbs. The requested $50,000
would provide fundingfor one purchase. It would be "gap" funding to reflect the higher property
values, and thus would make more properties available for WHAHL T to purchase in one of the three
cities.
The Planning Commission has heard a presentation by WHAHL T, and expressed support for it and
similar organizations in making affordable/life-cycle housing in Shorewood. The Planning
Commission has identified this issue as an important one to study in 2004.
WHAHL T is requesting support of its application through a resolution of the City Council. The
resolution of support would strengthen the application, and assure Hennepin County that the City
Council has been involved in the development and submission of the application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council adopt the proposed resolution supporting the application
for CDBG funds by the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust.
ft
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER .:If:. 3 C
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION
BY THE WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TRUST
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING
FROM THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CONSOLIDATED POOL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shorewood has, in its Comprehensive Plan,
identified the need to address a diversity of housing options and price ranges within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City encourages innovative approaches to address the issues identified in
the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that a "housing land trust" is an innovative and
appropriate way to address the issue of affordable/life-cycle housing over the long term; and
WHEREAS, the City is within the area served by the Hennepin County Consolidated Pool
for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding from the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development; and
WHEREAS, the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) is making an
application for CDBG funding from the Hennepin County Consolidated Pool; and
WHEREAS, the City believes that this proposal is one which is well-conceived, well-
reasoned, is consistent with its Comprehensive Plan, and can be used within Shorewood;
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Shorewood that it
supports the application being submitted by the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust for .
Community Development Block Grant funding from the Hennepin County Consolidated Pool,
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council urges Hennepin County to approve
the application and make funds available.
ADOPTED by the City Council ofthe City of Shorewood this 23rd day of February, 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
Draft
2-17-04
2004 APPLICATION FORM
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM
CONSOLIDATED POOL
GENERALINFO~TION
1. Applicant(s): West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust
2. Project Name: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust
3. CDBG funding request: $50,000.00
.
4. Total project cost: $136,950.00
5. Contact person: Jan Callison
6. Phone #: 952.401.7071
E-mail: WHAHLT@mn.rr.com
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Provide a brief description of the proj ect. (Limit one page)
.
West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHL T) proposes to create a
unit of affordable housing in the community of Orono, Shorewood or Tonka Bay.
The property would become part ofthe permanently affordable housing stock of
that community through the community land trust model. The funding requested
here would be "gap assistance" and is necessary because of the relatively high
cost of property in these communities.
If funded, WHAHLT will acquire an existing unit of housing in one of these
communities. Minimal rehab of the unit is likely to be required and will be
performed under WHAHLT's direction. The house will be sold to a frrst-time
homebuyer earning 80% or less of area median income. Community land trust
restrictions will apply so that the house remains permanently affordable.
The decision about where the house will be located-in which of these three
communities-will be determined by the market. As an appropriate house
becomes available in one of these communities, WHAHLT will seek to acquire it.
2. Describe any unique features of the proposal.
Several features of this project are unique.
1
First, it proposes to create affordable housing in communities where the
opportunities to do so are relatively limited and where additional tools to create
affordable housing are being sought. Orono, Shorewood and Tonka Bay are
characterized by high land values, making the acquisition of property for
affordable housing in these communities more challenging. Given that fact, this
project is significant as a first step towards creating more housing choices and as a
demonstration of the usefulness of the community land trust model. In fact, in
many ways it would function as a demonstration project, illustrating the
applicability of this affordable housing tool to these communities and elsewhere.
Second, the affordable unit to be created here will become permanently affordable
meaning that the funding being requested here will not pro4uce one-time
affordability but will be recycled to benefit subsequent homeowners and will
remain in the community. This benefit derives from two features ofWHAHLT as
a community land trust. Initial affordability is obtained by removing the market
value ofthe land from the mortgage equation. Permanent affordability is obtained
through: (1) a pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of
equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and (2) a
resale restriction that requires the homeowner to sell the house to either another
low- to moderate- income household or to WHAHLT. Attachment 1 provides
further information on how the community land trust model works.
.
Third, the project will preserve an existing unit of housing. This means that
services are already available to this unit, that no permitting process is necessary
and that it already fits within the neighborhood.
3. Identify the project area/location.
The project area/location is Orono, Shorewood or Tonka Bay.
.
PROJECT FEASIBILITY
1. Provide a detailed project budget, itemizing major project components.
The following budget is based upon WHAHLT's average development costs to
date, adjusted to reflect the higher market value land costs that WHAHLT would
expect to encounter in these three communities. WHAHL T anticipates that this is
the maximum amount that would be spent:
$116,500
$122.500
$239,000
1300
$240 300
2
Total rehabilitation ex enses
$ 4,500
costs
$ 600
$ 800
$ 400
$ 3,300
$ 4.150
$ 9,250
Total Ac uisition and Develo
$254,050
.
Revenues
Sale to ualified homebu er
Grants & contributions
Total Revenue
$117,100
$136.950
$254,050
*To date, average market value for land has been $66,500
2. Identify all funding sources being considering, including amounts and the status
of each source.
WHAHL T has submitted the following funding requests for its 2004 activities. If
this request is approved and if the funding requests identified below are granted in
appropriate amounts, WHAHL T would anticipate using funds from them for this
project:
.
HOME (Hennepin County)
Amount Re uested
$ 61,700
$100,000
$300,000
Status
Submitted-Awaiting
decision
Submitted-Awaiting
decision
Submitted-Awaiting
decision
Source
MN Housing Finance
A ency
Family Housing Fund
3. Explain why CDBG funds are needed to implement this project.
In the past, WHAHL T has typically paid no more than $200,000 as the purchase
price for properties that it has acquired in the four communities in which it
currently operates-New Hope, Minnetonka, Richfield and Wayzata. These are
communities in which the average assessed market value reported by Hennepin
County for 2002 was as low as $126,191 (Richfield) and as high as $388,641
(Wayzata). The average value of the land for parcels acquired by WHAHLT to
date is $65,500.
3
For the three communities included in this proposal, land prices are such that
WHAHLT anticipates having to pay more than $200,000 in order to purchase a
property that is appropriate for affordable housing. For example, average 2002
assessed market value in Shorewood was $299,490 and, in Orono, was the highest
in Hennepin County-$406,308. The challenges of acquiring properties in these
communities are confirmed by more current assessing data: Shorewood has 144
residential parcels assessed at less than in $200,000, but has 507 parcels assessed
at less than $250,000. In Tonka Bay, 92 residential parcels are valued below
$200,000 but 160 are below $250,000.
Without the CDBG assistance being requested here, WHAHLT does not believe it
will be able to use anticipated funding sources to make any property affordable.
4. For the time period 7-1-04 to 12-31-05, provide an implementation schedule,
identifying major project tasks and when they will occur. Priority will be given
to projects that can be completed with 12 months.
.
Date
7 -04 to 12-04
12-04 to 2-05
5-05
Activity
Locate and purchase property
Rehab property; identify qualified household
Complete sale to qualified household
5. Describe applicant's expertise and financial capacity to implement the proposed
activity.
Since its incorporation as a non-profit corporation in May, 2001, WHAHLT has
purchased fourteen homes for affordable housing and has entered into
commitments to acquire five additional units. Of the units owned by WHAHLT,
ten have been sold to qualifying households and buyers have been identified for .
the remaining four. This proposal builds on the experience that we have garnered
over the past two and one-half years. It is based upon, and follows, the model that
we have now spent more than two years developing.
PROJECT BENEFIT
1. Describe how the project principally benefits low and moderate-income residents.
Only low- and moderate-income households will benefit.
WHAHL T properties are sold to households earning 80% or less of area median
income. Through December of 2003, the average income of a WHAHL T
household was $34,000. Several WHAHLT homeowners have had incomes less
than 50% of area median income.
4
Upon resale of the property, restrictions in the ground lease (the legal agreement
entered into by WHAHLT and the homeowner) require that the house be sold to
another low- to moderate-income household or to WHAHLT.
.2. Estimate the number oflow/moderate-income households/persons to be served by
the project.
One low/moderate income household will be served initially. Other low/moderate
income households will be served as the house is sold and resold.
3. Describe how the project aids in the prevention or elimination of blight.
.
WHAHLT would not expect that its activity would aid in the elimination of blight
in the proposed communities of Orono, Shorewood or Tonka Bay. This relates
both to the general quality of the housing stock in those communities and the fact
that WHAHLT would expect to acquire a property in need oflittle or no rehab.
However, the community land trust model does provide some assurances about
the long-term quality of the affordable unit that will be created. Because
WHAHL T retains ownership of the land, it also retains an on-going interest in the
property. This means that it joins the homeowner in desiring to see the property
well-maintained. And, as a community-based organization, it seeks to maintain a
relationship with homeowners including their service on the WHAHL T Board of
Directors. In many ways, it works in partnership with the property owner and is
available to provide assistance to the owner if needed.
4. Describe how the project expands or preserves the existing tax base.
.
Although the unit will be affordable, taxes will be assessed on the full market
value of the property-land and house. The tax base is preserved.
5. Describe how the project provides expanded opportunities for residents or
preserves existing resources.
The project will provide an affordable unit in one of these communities. To the
extent that it is successful, it may create incentives to provide additional .
opportunities for affordable housing. And, if existing housing can be preserved
for affordable units, some ofthe pressure to develop new affordable housing may
diminish.
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
1. Describe any multi-community or multi-agency aspects of the project.
Three communities are cooperating on this application-Orono, Shorewood and
Tonka Bay.
5
2. Describe how the project meets one of the high priority needs, as identified in the
2000-2004 Consolidated Plan.
While it is unlikely that this unit could be sold to a household earning below 30%
of area median income, it is possible that it could be sold to a household earning
less than 50% of area median income. WHAHLT's ability to meet this target
depends upon the value of the land underlying the property that it acquires. The
higher the relative value of land, the lower the value of the house and the more
likely that it could serve a lower-income family. For example, WHAHLT has
been able to sell properties for as little as $106,000 because of the high value of
the land.
In addition, houses on larger lots tend to have higher land values. Orono,
Shorewood and Tonka Bay are communities were land values are relatively high
and lots tend to be fairly large. Given this, it may be likely that the unit could be
sold to a household at less than 50% of area median income.
.
3. Describe how the project meets locally identified housing and community
development needs.
The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Shore wood identifies the need to address
a diversity of housing options and price ranges within the City. It supports
innovative ways to address the issue of affordable/life-cycle housing over the long
term. There are approximately 2,800 parcels of land in Shorewood, nearly all of
which are developed or guided as residential. Of these parcels, less than 15% fit
within the affordable criteria followed by WHAHL T for acquisition. With the
rapid appreciation of property values in Shorewood, this percentage will be
decreasing.
[additional responses to be provided by Orono and Tonka Bay]
.
4. Describe how the project is consistent with the city's comprehensive and land use
plans and, if appropriate, how the project addresses the city's Livable
Communities Act goals.
As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with Shorewood's Comprehensive
Plan and land use policies. Under the goals of the Livable Communities Act,
Shorewood was to see that 62 units of affordable housing were produced. These
units were provided in a senior-targeted twin-home development. The City's
Comprehensive Plan endorses the availability of additional affordable units within
Shorewood.
[additional responses to be provided by Orono and Tonka Bay]
5. Letters of support may be included with the application.
6
.
.
'CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
. TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
1Y
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
February 18,2004
Resolution Declaring Public Adequacy of Petition for the Extension of Municipal
Water Service along Timber Lane
Attachment 1 is a petition that was received by the City for the extension ofmunicipal water service
for Timber Lane. Attachment 2 is a site location map that indicates those properties submitting the
petition.
It should be noted there are several parcels that abut the project that are not involved in the petition
under consideration. Attachment 3 denotes the subject parcels. Three of the parcels are deemed
. unbuildable along the north side of Timber Lane. A fourth area that is not impacted by the project is
the common area for the town homes along Lawtonka Drive. These residents are already served by
municipal water service.
There remains one additional parcel located at the westerly endofthe Timber Lane cul-de-sac.
Many years ago, the owner of this property obtained permission to connect to the City of Tonka
Bay's water system. Staff will review the status of connection fees and benefit for this property as
part of the feasibility report.
Since all of the properties that petitioned are contiguous, and watermain is available at the
intersection of Lawtonka Drive and Timber Lane, Staff is recommending that a feasibility report be
prepared to investigate the costs of such an extension.
Once the feasibility report has been prepared that document costs and timeframes, petitioners will
have the opportunity to comment as to whether to proceed with the project. If the project is to
proceed, the City can decide to assess the project to the petitioners as Minnesota State Statute 429
project. If,..at that time, all of the property owners agree and waive their right to appeal an
assessment, a public hearing would not be mandated. However, as a courtesy, the City would hold a
public information meeting to address any questions residents may have.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the resolution that declares adequacy of the petition for the extension
of municipal water service along Timber Lane.
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
=#- ,3 D
to.
(!/I .
L.
C d '( f o.i.J.lJ~l' L
LaII::) B{"Dt.J~
C/4-<.O Dat:.J)"ou
FEB . . 6 2004
February 5, 2004
To The City Council of Shorewood,
It is our hope that home owners of Timber Lane are given the oppOltunity to connect to
City water.
.
At this preliminary stage, we are requesting that the City of Shorewood provide us with a
feasibility study and cost estimate.
At the time of my inquiry at City Hall, I was told that a likely hookup to Lawtonka Drive
is a possibility. I was also informed that consideration for such a project would require
the consent of the majority of property owners.
Out of the eight residences in question, I was able to secure seven interested parties, as
per signatures on the attached petition.
Pleuse let us know of the next necessary step. We are looking forward to hearing from
you. /..
Sincerely,
~
Hans J. Schaub
5465 Timber Lane
Shorewood, MN 55331
.
c:.....-
/
_/
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT 1
PETITION
."."
PETITION FOR LOCAL ll\1PROVEMENT
City of Shorewood
State of Minnesota
To the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota:
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS of the real property described as:
7/ H BEt< L,4N'E
,
c3A-iV L/-
2001
/
hereby petition, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, for the following public improvements:
Cl/"TY . ~ArEtR EXrEN//~
. FFA{~J~~ILI:;Y JTU.z;y ,A^O~ LD5/ ES7/,vt/4/~s
EACH OWNER FURTHER AGREES, in consideration of the City action at our request to cause
constrUction of the above-described improvement, to pay such sums as may be determined by the City to be
a fair and reasonable apportionment of the costs of said improvement.
OWNER EXPRESSLY WAIVES OBJECTION to any irregularity with regard to the making of the
improvement or assessment of the cost thereof; waives any claim that the' amount thereof levied against
owner's property is excessive; and waives all rights of appeal in the courts.
1. ~ 7lotS~fiZZ =:j;-:;:;; lIeI ;criptiO~;;;e;
. 2. /Y/~Ge Y~657<. 5.~ qs..
3. r 5JE.~ -P JJ / A /VA- -/UJ.1fI IV.s <,5 7", ) <;"
4. '~J (f,/t1-t./)/ /;c/I/Jp-e s-v 6 S
Examined, hec, d to be in proper form and to be signed by the owner(s) of the above-
stated quantity of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
City Administrator/Clerk
.,'
DATE
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
10. -'
11.
12. .
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. .
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
II
.
"tIS' .......
m1"-
i
i
;
.
"
,
'"
'"
,
,
,
'"
,
~~~_:-~-
I
Ii
5
c
~
...J
~
l'l
o
0:::
lL.
z
o
I---t
~
U
o
~
~
Cfl
\
/'
.......
\
,
,
.- fr~ J
----~.-i R
._.w_--.. -) .
----.-.- .----{
, .
-.-t-- I; ,
_____________________________-L____________
---'---',
~ '
\ \
\ \
----~
"
"
.."J..;;..'........
"''\'" );! /
- --r--- ~~ x""
'----.: \\
,
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION OF LOTS
SUBMITTING PETITION
,
)...--.
"
,
-.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
~
-(
~
~
z
o
E-<
~
~
o
~
~
~
CI)
Cl
~
~
C>
o
0::
Ii.
,
\.
'--...-/
~ I
i ; . '
__..~._-i ! 1
. .
~18 fl
1 . ,
Wi
-_.: 'I Q~ '
"-..~......: j
---- ;
-..,J.--...,.........__ ./.,
\......./'/
\\--~.........
\
r-.
,~".
,,' .
"
/
~\:~ /
ATTACHMENT 3
LOTS NOT INCLUDED
AS PART OF PROJECT
;
i
,
i
_________~________L-___________
iI
.
.
'.
,
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE ADEQUACY OF A PETITION FOR THE EXTENSION
OF MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE ON TIMBER LANE
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is in receipt of a petition (Petition) requesting that the City
allow the watermain to be extended to the petitioners' property; and
WHEREAS, the names of those petitioners and their associated locations are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Lucille Goodwyn. .... ...... ......... ..... ... .....5525 Timber Lane
Richard Tradewell... .......................... ..5515 Timber Lane
Peter Wattson....... .,. ...... ....... .... .... .... ..5495 Timber Lane
Donald Erickson. . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .5485 Timber Lane
Hans Schaub................................... ....5465 Timber Lane
Steven & Diana Haskins. ......... ............: ..5455 Timber Lane
Marjorie yaeger................................ ...5445 Timber Lane
Tom & Nancy Henke.......................... ...5435 Timber Lane
WHEREAS, additional properties denoted as
9. Gideon Cove Homeowners Association. . .. . . .Pill 34-117-23-22-0041
10. Gideon Cove Homeowners Association..... ..Pill 34-117-23-22-0038
11. . Albert & Valarie Guralnik. .......... ... ..... ....Pill 34-117-23-22-0004
abut the Improvement and have been determined that said lots are unbuildable under separate
proceedings by the City Council, and therefore shall not be included as part of this Improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Petition and identified the owners of the real properties
named in the Petition and has determined that the Petition has been duly executed by the owners of
100% of real property affected by the Improvement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood,
Minnesota:
1. The Petition is hereby declared to have been signed by the owners of 100% of the real
properties named in the petition as the location of the Improvement.
2. The Petition is hereby referred to the City Engineer for the preparation of a feasibility
report.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 23rd day of February,
2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
.
j.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A WETLAND SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR THE LINDEN HILLS DEVELOPMENT LLC
WHEREAS, Linden Hills Development LLC (Applicant) is the owner of real property
located at 5965 Linden Court (the Subject Property) in the City of Shorewood, legally described
as:
"Lot 4, Linden Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota."; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a setback to build a new home closer to a
wetland than the Shorewood Code currently allows; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 2
October 2003, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 October 2003, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request for a wetland setback variance was considered by the
City Council at its regular meeting on 27 October 2003, at which time the Planner's
memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were
heard by the Council from the City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
district.
The Subject Property is located in an R -1 C single-family residential zoning
2. The Subject property is occupied by a low area that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District has determined is a wetland basin.
3. The City Code requires a 35-foot wetland buffer and a I5-foot building setback
from the wetland buffer.
4.
buffer.
The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requires only a I6.5-foot wetland
;13&..,
L"
5. The Subject Property is characterized by mature trees and dramatic changes in
elevation, that would have to be significantly altered in order to adhere to the City's wetland
setback requirements.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Planning Commission has determined that:
a. The proposed site plan results in no artificial obstruction being placed in
within the wetland. In addition the development of the lot provides a positive
outlet for surface water runoff from the low area.
b. The proposed home will not result in an incompatible land use that is
detrimental to the protection of surface and ground water supplies.
c. By minimizing site alteration, the proposed building plans are more consistent
with Shorewood's planning objectives than forcing the homes onto the lot in a
different configuration.
d. The proposed home fits the site better than if it is required to be modified. .
2. The Applicant has satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under Section
1102.09 of the Shorewood City Code.
3. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's request"
for a setback variance subject to the following:
a. The building setback from the wetland shall be 35 feet, of which 16.5 feet
shall be maintained as a natural buffer.
b. Building plans for a new home on the lot shall include a landscape plan,
showing wetland compatible vegetation marking the 16.5-foot buffer area.
4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this .
Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 23rd day of
February, 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR
-2-
1
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A WETLAND SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR THE LINDEN HILLS DEVELOPMENT LLC
I
WHEREAS, Linden Hills Development LLC (Applicant) is the owner of real property
located at 5975 Linden Court (the Subject Property) in the City of Shorewood, legally described
as:
"Lot 5, Linden Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota."; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a setback to build a new home closer to a
wetland than the Shorewood Code currently allows; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 2
October 2003, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 October 2003, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request for a wetland setback variance was considered by the
City Council at its regular meeting on 27 October 2003, at which time the Planner's
memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were
heard by the Council from the City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
district.
The Subject Property is located in an R-IC single-family residential zoning
2. The Subject property is occupied by a low area that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District has determined is a wetland basin.
3. The City Code requires a 35-foot wetland buffer and a IS-foot building setback
from the wetland buffer.
4.
buffer.
The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requires only a 16.5-foot wetland
#3E.-J,.
L
;
5. The Subject Property is characterized by mature trees and dramatic changes in
elevation, that would have to be significantly altered in order to adhere to the City's wetland
setback requirements.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Planning Commission has determined that:
a. The proposed site plan results in no artificial obstruction being placed in
within the wetland. In addition the development of the lot provides a positive
outlet for surface water runoff from the low area.
b. The proposed home will not result in an incompatible land use that is
detrimental to the protection of surface and ground water supplies.
c. By minimizing site alteration, the proposed building plans are more consistent
with Shorewood's planning objectives than forcing the homes onto the lot in a
different configuration.
d. The proposed home fits the site better than if it is required to be modified. .
2. The Applicant has satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under Section
1102.09 ofthe Shorewood City Code.
3. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's request
for a setback variance subject to the following:
a. The building setback from the wetland shall be 35 feet, of which 16.5 feet
shall be maintained as a natural buffer.
b. Building plans for a new home on the lot shall include a landscape plan,
showing wetland compatible vegetation marking the 16.5-foot buffer area.
4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this .
Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 23rd day of
February, 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR
-2-
-
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
.
DATE:
19 February 2004
RE:
Sign Permit - De'Paris Nails (Shorewood Village Center)
FILE NO.
Property (23700 State Highway 7)
Eagle Sign Company has applied for a sign permit for a new nail salon that will
occupy space in the Shorewood Village Center. The sign (Exhibit A) is well within
the allowable sign area for mall tenants as prescribed in the Center's current
conditional use permit. Similar to two recent sign permit requests for the center, there
ar~ two issues that need to be considered: 1) color oflettering; and 2) lighting.
.
The current sign plan for the Center specifies the lettering style (Helvetica) and color
(maroon). The De'Paris sign is red in color. This is considered to be a very minor
issue. ... Although the CUB Foods store was allowed to have internally lit signs, the
approved plan for the Center has never been modified to allow the same for mall
tenants. Representatives of the Center have finally applied for a revised conditional
use permit to address these issues. A public hearing will be scheduled for 9 March
2004 and for Council consideration on 23 March. Applicants have been advised that
they may order lit signs, somewhat at their own risk, as long as they do not turn on the
lighting until after a revised C.D.P. has been approved.
Subject to a stipulation that the sig!). not be lit until such time as a revised conditional
use permit for the Center has been approved, approval of the sign is recommended.
Cc: Barb or Dave
K. Lenneri
#3P
ft
~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-"'r
i
--r
I
i
!
;
..
:r If!
.::;::..
i
1
t---.~ --\
\ r.;p \
\- -=- ~
i
i
..!
!
i
\
i
I
1
.
.
SouthShore
· Center
2003 Report
.
SouthShore Center
5735 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
(952)-474-7635
1f 51T
2000
1800
1600
J!! 1400
c
Q) 1200
.-
-
0
..... 1000
0
r..
Q)
.c 800
E
:::s
z 600
400
200
0
.
.
Total Clients Served
From 1998 through 2003 .
D 1998 III 1999 D 2000
2001 II 2002 . 2003
CLIENTS SERVED
1B.9.8.- 19U.. 2mlll 200i 2D.02.. 200.3..
# Served I 710 I 1044
1098
1310
1641 I 1827 I
The number of clients served in 2003 has more than doubled
(1570/0 increase) since 1998.
.
.
.
.
Areas Served
900
800
700
c 600
0
:;:;
co 500
-
:J
0-
0
a.. 400
+
LO
(0 300
200
100
0
-
Excelsior Shorewood Deephaven Tonka Bay Greenwood Other
III Census II Clients
AREAS SERVED IN 2003
tLlodividuals 65 Years or Older
South
Estimated Shore
Census Clients
Excelsior 367 467
Shorewood 586 271
Deephaven 416 91 .
To~ka Bay 136 76
Greenwood 70 36
Other * 886
SOl:JTHSHORE Center served a higher number of
individuals in Excelsior than estimated by the census.
SOUTHSHORE Center is a United Way agency that is
not restricted to members, bqlis open to all.
The individuals represented under 'other' are from
surrounding areas such as: Chaska, Chanhassen,
Minnetonka, etc and new m.embers without complete
information in the database.
.
600
500
J!l 400
c:
co
c.
.-
CJ
~ 300
co
C.
'f-
0
=I:t: 200
100
.
.
Growth of Programs
o
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
.. Education III Recreation III Health
.
.
.
GROWTH OF PROGRAMS
Number of Participants
. Education Recreation l:Iealth
1998 218 309 106
1999 131 398 170
2000 123 519 156 .
2001 160 226 393
2002 246 332 398
2003 416 425 547
Recreational Programs were the most heavily attended prior to 2001.
SOUTHSHORE'S new focus on Health and Educational programs
has made them the most highly attended programs. .
('I)
o
o
N
UJ N
0
. C) 0
N
Z
-
..J
-
<C
:E
0::: -
w 0
0
l- N
I-
W
..J
U)
~
. W 0
0
Z 0
N
en
en
en
-
o
o
....
o
o
('I)
o
o
-
o
o
o
CD
o
o
'll:t
o
o
N
o
o
It)
s6umew #
NEWSLETTER MAILINGS
.,.,. lJl~ilinN~
.~
1999
100
2000
2001
.1~0
375
.
2002
475
2003
625
The Newsletter is mailed only when requested.
. Requests for the Newsletter in 2003 increased
31% from the prior year.
.
'f_.
6000 v-;;I
I~;:i
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
.
.
DINING
# of Meals and # of Individuals Dining
o
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
. # Meals Served
# Individuals
2003
'. DliNING
#of
Meals
Served
--.
19~Q
-;"."
-5202;
4626
.
1999
2000._
20Q~'-
2002
4322
_ ;,~ -398~?
4032
",'-'1-.
,4072,,>,
:!,~. .",., ,'.:? ~";<~:'-.l
.';."\"
\...
.
't~'.-' ,;.
'J;!:
.
.
TRANSPORTATION
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1998
1999 2000
III One Way Rides
2001 2002
III # Individuals
2003
-.....,.
TRANSPORT A TlON
One
Way # Individuals
Rides Riding
1998 .3339 75
1999 5729 161
2000 5534 158
2001 7659 155 .
2002 8636 .142
2003 6718 269
A 'One Way' ride is defined as from Point A to Point B.
For example, from home to the store is one ride and from
the storeb(icl< to home is another ride - or 2 'One-Way'
rides.
.
.
.
VOLUNTEER HOURS - NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
.. Volunteer Hours
# of Volunteers
VOLUNTEERS
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
339THlflD STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
TEL: 952-474-5233
FAX: 952-474-6300
February 12, 2004
FEB 1 7 2004
Mayor Woody Love and Councilmembers
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
.
Dear Mayor and Council members:
The recent departure of the Excelsior Fire District from its former station in downtown
Excelsior has created an opportunity to expand, renovate, or rebuild the existing
Hennepin County Library in Excelsior. To this end, Excelsior has formed a Public
Facilities Work Group which will present recommendations regarding expansion,
renovation, and rebuilding of both the City offices and the Library facility.
We are writing to you early in this process because Hennepin County Library estimates
that to adequately serve the population that currently uses the Excelsior branch, it will
require an expansion of the Library to approximately 8,000 to 10,000 gross square feet,
from its current size of 3,800 gross square feet.
.
As you may be aware, the current Library space is severely limited. There is no space
for a meeting room, and no place for programs for children or adults. There is a critical
need for more space for furniture and equipment. The Hennepin County Library system
provides books, audiovisual material, library and audiovisual furniture and equipment,
as well as the Library staff. Under current budget conditions, Hennepin County is
content to continue to lease space in its Excelsior branch location.
As we all know, the Hennepin County Library in Excelsior serves the entire South Lake
Minnetonka Community. The construction of the current library was funded in 1966 by
the five South Lake Minnetonka cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood,
Shorewood, and Tonka Bay. The City of Excelsior has provided utilities and regular
maintenance and upkeep.
Excelsior would like to extend an invitation to the other South Lake Minnetonka cities to
participate in a Library Committee that will provide assistance in the planning, financing,
and building of a library for South Lake Minnetonka patrons which will be either
remodeled or rebuilt in downtown Excelsior. We feel it is important for each of the
South Lake Minnetonka cities to participate jointly in the planning effort for this new
community library facility.
-U- 'J;().
+t- '-. t)
Letter - City of Shorewood
Mayor and Councilmembers
February 12, 2004
Page 2
Peggy Bauer, the Excelsior Branch Librarian, and a representative from Excelsior would
like to attend your February 25, 2004 City Council meeting to discuss this opportunity
with you. Please consider designating a volunteer from your city to serve as your
representative on the Library Committee.
An organizational meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 10,2004,
beginning at 3:30 p.m. in the Excelsior City Council Chambers. At this meeting,
representatives will have an opportunity to meet with the Public Facilities Work Group to .
get some background information on the current facility, so your prompt consideration
would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Tim Caron, Public Facilities Work Group Chairman
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARKCO~S~ONMEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY HALL
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
D."=.';1."..."
>., ~\;;
; i\
P'"
1-1
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Chair Arnst; Commissioners Callies, Davis, Young, Gilbertson, Meyer, and
Farniok; City Engineer Brown; Planning Director Nielsen; and City Council
liaison Lizee
B.
Review Agenda
.
A Park Foundation Report was added as Item #4D.
Davis moved, Meyer seconded, approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 7/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of January 13, 2004
Davis moved, Gilbertson seconded, approving the Park Commissioner Meeting Minutes of
January 13, 2004 as submitted. Motion passed 7/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were none.
4.
REPORTS
.
A. Report on City Council Meetings of January 26, 2004 and February 9, 2004
Meetings
Brown reported that during the February 9, 2004 City Council meeting, the Park Foundation
presented the City with a check, the Council approved the 2004 goals and priorities for the Park and
Planning Commissions, and heard application for the permitted use of a public right of way along
Birch Bluff Road for a private driveway. He noted that the Council also heard a report from BKV
Group, the consultants performing the space needs study for the City Hall. Brown stated that the
group has been examining water, roofing, and siding issues, as well as space needs. The alternatives
presented to Council included refurbishing the existing building, adding an addition and refurbishing
the building, demolition and reconstruction on this site, or locating and building at a new site.
Young asked how old the building was. Young questioned whether a second story could be added to
the building.
Although the facility was built in 1981, Brown stated that there have been continual water and mold
problems in the basement which concern him, as well as the fact that there is a lack of filing space
and desk room. Brown stated that they would need to investigate the potential for building up;
however, having been built on wetland, he did not believe this to be an acceptable alternative. Brown
11 It
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGE 2 OF7
stated that the sump pump runs continually, files in the basement have been damaged, ADA access is
an issue, and the facility fails to meet any fire protection standards. He pointed out that they continue
to investigate interim stop gap measures.
B. Update of Concessionaire Agreement
Brown distributed the concession agreement from 2003 noting that updates would be made before the
next Commission meeting. The updates would include reference to disposal of excess overstock at
the end of the season belonging to the City and an inventory of the overstock. Brown reported that
the concessionaire, Davis, has expressed interest in renewing his contract for 2004.
Chair Arnst asked how Sundays would be handled.
Brown indicated that the current concessionaire did not wish to operate on Sundays; therefore, the
City would be seeking a separate contract for Sundays.
.
Gilbertson suggested that item #3 of the concession agreement be clarified to identify certain days.
Chair Arnst questioned how the City would locate an alternate operator for Sundays.
Brown stated that the City would advertise in the paper and newsletter. He reminded the Commission
that, as a cash operation, the City would need to be cautious to find a reliable and trustworthy
operator.
Chair Arnst was pleased that Davis had agreed to run the concessions in 2004 and encouraged Brown
to open the concessions with the advent of sporting activities this spring.
C. County Road 19 Progress
.
Brown reported that he had met with the design engineers and that the onset of construction was
poised for spring. He indicated that, over the next 2 Yz months, new agreements would be made with
Hennepin County allowing the City to administer the construction process, financial matters, and the
maintenance of facilities. While Brown did not foresee any problems, another set of agreements
would be needed to move the Gideon Glen project forward after the ROW negotiations were
complete. Although WSB is trying to wrap up plans this week, Brown pointed out that Tonka Bay
still must approve the plans in order to proceed.
D. Park Foundation Report
Callies reported that the Park Foundation donated $5,000 to the Park Fund from the profits earned
from the 2003 Art for the Parks Craft Show. She noted that the profits of $8,000 were up from the
$5,000 made last year. She stated that there was nothing new to report regarding the buy-a-brick
program; however, plans for the bricks are moving forward.
Callies explained that the Foundation would be hosting a Fundraising event slated for May 25, 2004.
The breakfast for 200 will be held at the senior center and table captains will invite members of the
community to join them in supporting the Shorewood Park Foundation on a long term basis. Callies
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGE 3 OF7
invited interested members of the Park Commission to participate as table captains or pass along
contacts for the event to her. She pointed out that this fundraising formula has a proven performance
track record.
Meyer asked what the breakfast meeting would be about.
Callies stated that the Foundation will provide an inspirational speaker for the hour long breakfast to
encourage attendees to commit their financial support to the Foundation. She suggested that
someone like the skate park originator be invited to share his story of what the skate park has meant
to him and other users.
Chair Arnst asked what the Foundation hoped to accomplish or come away with.
.
Callies stated that, ifpeople are supportive, it is not unusual to raise $30,000. As it is believed there
are people out there with discretionary income to spend for a cause, it would be the Foundation's
intent to obtain commitments for annual contributions.
Gilbertson believed the breakfast to be a great idea and felt it would be beneficial to tie Shorewood's
park vision to the cause in order to excite people to give money.
Chair Arnst asked if the Commission should disconnect this fundraiser from the Eddy Station debt.
Lizee stated that the Foundation continues to carry a $10,000 commitment every year; however, this
breakfast provides an ongoing big picture investment for all parks.
Callies stated that, with the contribution last night, the Foundation met its 2003 commitment.
.
Chair Arnst encouraged interested Commissioners to let Callies know.
Callies asked to be given the names of any interested party or contributor with disposable income
that Commissioners could think of. She pointed out that the Foundation would be lining up speakers
and staff for the event soon.
Meyer stated that, given the lack of follow-thru on the buy-a-brick fundraiser, she, for one, would be
hesitant to donate any more money to the Park Foundation. She stated that, had she written a check to
the Foundation three years ago for a brick and nothing had been accomplished to date, she would not
perceive this fundraiser any differently.
Callies stated that the Foundation uses several different fundraising tools, of which the buy-a-brick is
just one, and the breakfast another.
Davis questioned whether the event was too soon. She was concerned that the breakfast and
recruiting of table captains and attendees would take longer lead time. She also believed the
Foundation should have something to show for its past fundraising efforts, i.e. the buy-a-brick
program.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGE 4 OF7
.'
While he did not wish to pitch a debt reduction, Young acknowledged that the breakfast should
provide a new dramatic image to capture financial commitments. He questioned whether there was
adequate time to come up with a new push to present by May.
On the contrary, Gilbertson stated that he was getting more excited about the potential for this
fundraiser the more he heard. He pointed out that the Foundation has chosen a date, are trying
something positive, and could promote several park initiatives, including the wetland garden, to
capture fmancial gains for the parks. By selling what more could be done for the parks with
attendees' commitments, the Foundation could move some good ideas forward.
Callies stated that this initiative requires more manpower and is timed to capitalize on the fundraising
months of May and September.
5.
DISCUSS FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FOR THE PARK
COMMISSION
.
Chair Arnst welcomed Planning Director Nielsen and asked him to explain how the master plan is
used in planning for City parks.
Nielsen stated that the master plan is used as a blue print for the long term physical development of
the City. He pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan is broken down into four chapters; Natural
Environment, Land Use, Transportation, and Community Facilities which includes parks. He stated
that the Planning Process is used to identify issues to be addressed, which are then put into a
planning inventory of what you've got. This leads to the policy plan, the most important part of the
decision making process, made up of goals and objectives which arrives at maps and policy. While
the actual master plan belongs in the plan, projects, and programs section, the implementation section
is the most difficult part. Never stagnant, Nielsen noted that during the 4th phase, the tools for
implementation include the CIP and regulation. Finally, in reality, Nielsen stated that this is a
cyclical pattern and the final phase of the process should redirect individuals to begin the process
anew.
.
With regard to park use, Nielsen used the archery analogy, in explaining the varying demands for
recreation and the Commission's responsibility to decide what is appropriate. Fortunately, he pointed
out that policies created during the master planning phase encourage a balance of active and passive
uses. Nielsen stated that Shorewood is very good at using its comp plan and reviewing it
periodically.
Chair Arnst asked when the next review process would occur.
While the review should occur every five years, Nielsen stated that they are currently reviewing
certain aspects, including revisions and updates to the demographics.
Gilbertson stated that this process should be useful in examining what future trends might be.
Brown questioned what process the Commission has in place to evaluate a request that comes from a
sports organization. While the Commission has set up a master plan with a vision, he asked how the
can address a request without more than the reply that the parks are full according to the vision.
Unlike Planning Policy, Brown pointed out that the Park Commission has little policy to identify or
direct its vision. Brown suggested the Commission give thought to creating a mini planning or zoning
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGESOF7
map for Freeman Park, which would include the wetland area, wooded passive area, etc. By
providing a visual map to refer to when evaluating requests, the Commission may succeed in taking
some of the subjectivity out ofthe park planning process.
Chair Arnst applauded the suggestion and agreed that the Commission needs to have a better process
in place to respond to requests. ill fact, Chair Arnst maintained that creating a mini-zoning map of a
park would be cutting edge. She asked that this be added to an upcoming work session.
6.
RECONSIDER "CAR POOLING" PARKING SIGNS
While the City Council's feedback was to encourage car pooling, they would not endorse an
enforceable sign. Brown stated that the proposed signage would consist of 4 signs in the northerly lot
near Eddy Station.
'.
Young stated that he would not support spending money on signs that would not work. He questioned
whether simply encouraging sports organizations to recommend car pooling to their users would be
adequate.
Brown stated that the City and Community Rec Resources already urges sports organizations to car
pool.
Chair Arnst asked what the cost would be.
Brown stated that the signs would cost approximately $150 plus installation.
Davis stated she did not believe the users would car pool on their own and felt the signage would at
least encourage self policing.
.
Gilbertson stated that he did not think the car pool spots would sit empty; in fact, he maintained that
the 4 spots would encourage more car pooling.
Farniok concurred, stating that the signs would not hurt anything, and may promote car pooling.
Meyer suggested the word please be added to the signs.
Gilbertson moved, Meyer seconded, to recommend the installation of car pooling signs, with
the following revised language, "Reserved for car pools of 4 or more please". Motion passed
7/0.
7. LACROSSE
A. Review Data
Referring to Park Secretary Grout's memorandum, Brown reported that Lacrosse is on the horizon,
with clubs forming across the metro area.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGE60F7
Kristi Anderson, of Community Rec Resources, stated that MCES currently supplies Minnetonka
Clubs with field space.
Brown stated that the City should take this opportunity to look at and plan for the advent of Lacrosse
in the City or decide not to make room for it. He noted that the City is in a good position to prepare
for the requests using the priority policy. He questioned where the Commission saw the activity
taking place within the Freeman 'zoning map' and encouraged the Commission to give this thought
as they planned activities.
8. FREEMAN PARK WATER GARDEN & TRAIL CONNECTION TO COUNTY RD 19
A. Research on Grant Writing
Brown reported that Technician Bailey had been researching numerous grants to support the trails,
water quality, and water garden plan; however, found that most of the grant opportunities have
withered away for 2004. The DNR indicated that 2005 should be more promising with regard to .
funding opportunities. In the interim, Brown stated that Bailey will continue with the planning phase
of the project and continue in his research efforts. Mark Themig, a grant specialist from Shakopee,
also acknowledged that funding is not available this year.
Brown stated that he would have further to report in April, along with a preliminary planning Park
Activity map for Freeman.
Davis indicated that she approached the Arboretum about hosting a seminar geared to City's to
discuss grant opportunities.
Brown noted that the City continues to hit up the Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County to
help with aspects of the water garden project.
9.
DISCUSS RENEWAL OF MN RECREATION AND PARKS ASSOCIATION
.
Chair Arnst reported that the new interim Director for the Mn. Recreation and Parks Association will
be Michelle Snider. She asked that the Commission renew its annual membership to the organization.
Gilbertson moved, Callies seconded, to recommend renewal of the Mn. Recreation and Parks
Association for the City of Shorewood. Motion passed 7/0.
10. RECOMMENDATION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2004
Meyer moved, Gilbertson seconded, to name Pat Arnst Park Commission Chair and Sue Davis
Vice-Chair for 2004. Motion passed 7/0.
11. NEW BUSINESS
Kristi Anderson, CRR, explained that Mark Ridge, Representative for East Tonka Little League
(ETLL), contacted her via email asking for a reduction in user fees or waiving of the park user
fee to allow ETLL to use Manor Park facilities this spring. She stated that ETLL indicated they
may consider charging Shorewood residents an additional fee to offset the charge for field time
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
PAGE70F7
in Shorewood. Anderson pointed out that she forwarded the same policy and opinions laid out to
Adult Softball at the last Commission meeting.
Chair Arnst encouraged Anderson to relay to ETLL that they are welcome to attend a
Commission meeting to be heard. She also stated that the representative was not being entirely
truthful about fees paid elsewhere and those in kind paid to Bennett. She suggested Anderson
forward the emai1 to all Commissioners.
Anderson stated that it seemed as though many sports organizations are fearful of the precedent
being set here, as well as a multitude of other communities, requiring user fees for field use.
Chair Arnst stated that ETLL was not experiencing money problems, in fact, she pointed out that
Adult Softball, who had addressed the Commission last month committed $150,000 to the new
sports dome. She pointed out that Shorewood is not alone in charging user fees, noting that Ft
Snelling charges $70 an hour for field use, and the new sports dome will charge $300 an hour.
.
In other business, Chair Arnst relayed a commendation from the public recognizing public works
for a great job plowing the trails at Freeman Park. She also asked that the Commission be
notified in advance when the Council plans to recognize a retiring Commissioner or welcome a
new Commissioner so that other Commissioners might be in attendance.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meyer moved, Davis seconded, to adjourn the Regular Park Commission Meeting of
February 10,2004 at 9:03 P.M. Motion passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLYSUBNUTTED.
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION
MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY HALL
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
ORAfl
1.
CONVENE PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MEETING
The Work Session convened at 9:08 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Chair Arnst; Commissioners Young, Davis, Callies, Gilbertson, Meyer, and Famiok;
City Engineer Brown; and City Council liaison Lizee.
B. J{.eview Agenda
.
Chair Arnst indicated that the discussion this evening would focus primarily upon defming a
vision, followed by 2B-D to be discussed at a later date.
2. COMMUNITY EVENT
A. Define a Vision
Chair Arnst asked for feedback regarding a community event surrounding a series of music in the
parks events. She explained that interest by residents had been expressed to help begin a music in
the park event, similar to successful models in Buffalo and Plymouth.
Davis commented that the Arboretum hosts a very successful music series on Thursday evenings,
in which the public comes in droves, picnics on the lawn, and takes tours of the arboretum.
Chair Arnst stated that Julie Moore, of Shorewood, has contacts in Chanhassen and Eden Prairie,
who have also b(::gun or plan to begin similar series.
.
Brown stated that Julie Moore's contact in Chanhassen have indicated that they would share
information they have learned beginning this endeavor.
While Chair Arnst suggested Shorewood start out conservatively, she noted that the pieces to
make this a success seem to be in place. She asked if a conditional use permit would be
necessary.
Brown stated that if the Commission came to a consensus that they would support a music series
in the park, they could pass this on to the City Council for review to gain their feedback and
determine whether a modification to the ordinance for special events is warranted.
It was agreed that a music series would likely play from 6:30-9PM on Friday evenings near Eddy
Station.
. .
Meyer encouraged the Commission to be cautious who they choose for the first event, to ensure
the event sits well with the neighbors and gains their support.
Chair Arnst suggested the event be scheduled a minimum of three times this year. The second
Friday of each month June-August. (June 11, July 9, and August 13).
The Commission voiced unanimous consensus to support this suggestion.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2004
PAGE20F2
Young asked the status of the collaborative with the senior center.
Chair Arnst noted that this event would be separate from a partnership with the senior center. She
pointed out that the music series would be simple to execute, would take little planning, and
ready made for the concessions operator.
Gilbertson pointed out that the City would not want to schedule anything at Badger Park for at
least the next I Y2 years during the construction phase of the County Road 19 intersection.
Callies asked if parking would be an issue.
Brown indicated that they could check into parking.
Chair Arnst encouraged Brown to take this initiative to City Council for their feedback. She
indicated that she would begin the process with Julie Moore and asked whether the Commission
would support sponsorship of the series.
Farniok cautioned the Commission from allowing the event to become too commercialized.
.
Brown stated that, if done tastefully, sponsorship ofthe music series could aid in building
community and Offset some of the costs down the road.
February 23, 2004, Chair Arnst agreed to act as Park Commission liaison to relay the
Commission's support for the music series to Council.
B. Define Partners
C. Produce a Revenue Stream for Parks
D. Regular Programming
3. ADJOURNMENT
The Work Session adjourned at 9:37 P.M.
.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952)474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: .
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
10/..
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE:
February 18,2004
RE:
Music in the Park
At the February 10th, 2004, Park Commission meeting, a recommendation was made and passed to
establish events and dates for "Music in the Park."
The recommendation was to facilitate Music in the Park at Freeman Park using the covered pavilion
area of Eddy Station. It was recommended that three dates be used for these events. These dates are:
. Friday, June 11th
. Friday, July 9th
. Friday, August 13th
Park Chairperson, Pat Arnst will elaborate in detail regarding this event.
Recommendation
The recommendation made and passed by the Park Commission is to establish the Fridays of June 11,
July 9, and August 13, 2004 as Music in the Park events at Freeman Park.
*178
ft
~t1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~
.~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3,2004
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chair Woodruff called the meeting to order at 7:04 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Bailey (arrived 7:08 P.M.); Commissioners Borkon, Conley, Gagne, Packard
(arrived at 7:58 P.M.) and Woodruff; Council Liaison Turgeon, and Planning Director
Nielsen
Absent:
Commissioner Pisula
. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
· January 20, 2004
Gagne moved, Borkon seconded, Approving the January 20, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes as presented. Motion passed 4/0.
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - LOT SIZE VARIANCE FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION
Applicant: James Marso
Location: 5495 Wedgewood Drive
Acting Chair Woodruff opened the Public Hearing at 7:05 P.M., noting the procedures to be utilized in a
Public Hearing.
.
Director Nielsen explained the history of the case, noting the applicant, Mr. James Marso, owned the
property at 5495 Wedgewood Drive. He proposed subdividing the property into two lots. The property
was zoned R-1C, Single-Family Residential, and currently contained 31,844 square feet of area, including
a recently vacated right-of-way. Since the R-1C district required lots to be 20,000 square feet in area, Mr.
Marso was requesting a variance to the lot area requirement.
He went on to explain the lot was located where Wedgewood Drive bent to the east. The westerly two-
thirds of the lot was considered relatively level, with the easterly third dropping more steeply into a
natural drainageway that bordered the easterly side of the lot. The location of the trees were scattered on
the property with the heaviest vegetation along the southerly lot line. Director Nielsen reminded the
Commission the City recently vacated excess right-of-way that existed along the southerly boundary and
in the northeasterly corner of the site.
Chair Bailey arrived at 7 :08 P.M.
Director Nielsen went on to explain the issues and analysis for this case. He explained that despite the
vacated right of way, the applicant's property was short of the area required for two lots by 8156 square
feet, necessitating variances of 3377 square feet for the westerly proposed lot and 4779 square feet for the
easterly lot. With regard to lot area, the applicant cited substandard lots in other parts of the community,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
February 3, 2004
Page 2 of 5
>>!"
most of which examples were in different zoning districts. While one lot was less than 20,000 square feet
in the applicant's neighborhood, the lots along Wedgewood tended to be very similar in area to the
applicant's. The range of lot sizes shown sun"ounding the site was 18,513 square feet to 51,800 square
feet, with an average of 29,350 square feet. Thus, the lots proposed by the applicant would be out of
character with the area in which the property was located. With regard to lot frontage and configuration,
Director Nielsen explained the applicant's property had approximately 355 feet of frontage. He noted this
was not significantly more than a standard corner lot in the R-1 C District would have at 300 feet in
frontage. He also noted the lot spacing in the area seemed appropriate currently. Director Nielsen noted
the applicant believed strongly that the excess frontage, lot area, and spacing of homes on Wedgewood
suggested the site be divided into two lots. This was not Director Nielsen's belief with regard to these
issues. Furthermore, Director Nielsen noted significant concerns for the drainage issues in the area of the
site. City maps had suggested the natural hillside was carved out to create a walkout basement for the
house on the site, which could have been affected by the natural drainage way in that area. Director
Nielsen stated he believed any issue of drainage could be corrected by grading the property. He also
noted the applicant's offer to replace the natural drainage way with a storm sewer pipe was contrary to
Shorewood's past policies that favored natural drainage over man-made. Detailed grading plans and
surface water runoff calculations would be necessary to determine if the drainage would be improved by a
pipe. For these reasons, Director Nielsen noted the arguments submitted in writing by the applicant failed
to demonstrate any hardship in the case existed.
.
James Marso, 5495 Wedgewood Drive, stated he believed a hardship did exist in this case, most notably
due to the drainage in the area. He stated he believed this drainage was created by the construction of
Fairway Drive, a street the City had built recently. He then reviewed the issues submitted in his letter to
Director Nielsen, showing a revision date of 1/6/04. He cited considerations for the variance should be
related to an increase in tax base for the City, issues related to lot size, frontage, efforts to mitigate the
existing drainage problems on Wedgewood Drive, and no adverse impact to the character of the
neighborhood.
Patricia Shoemaker, 5440 Teal Circle, stated her property was the adjacent property to the north with her
backyard facing the applicant's property. She was opposed to the proposed construction, as it would have
a negative impact on her view. Furthermore, she purchased the property ten years ago due to the spacing
between the homes and lot sizes in the area with the wooded character. She stated she was concerned for
the additional noise, traffic, and density another house would bring to the neighborhood, due to the fact .
there were nine duplexes and one apartment building in the nearby vicinity currently.
Patricia Arnst, 5480 Teal Circle, stated she had lived in the area 27 years, and she had never been
assessed to date. She also clarified the street Mr. Marso referred to was not Fairway Drive, but was
Harding Lane. She stated she believed the proposed construction would alter the character of the houses
in the neighborhood, as the styles proposed was not found in the neighborhood. Additionally, it seemed
as though the houses proposed would most likely be large and thus, located close to lot lines.
Terri Broussard, 5455 Teal Circle, stated she was opposed to the project due to drainage that would be
created with a second home on the site. She stated there was excess water currently in the area, and there
did not appear to be a need to increase the runoff or the traffic in the neighborhood.
Pam Evans, 5460 Wedgwood Drive, stated lots in the neighborhood currently experienced flooding in the
springtime. She stated she was opposed to the variance due to the additional drainage and subsequent
water problems that would inherently be part of a project such as the one proposed.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:43 P.M. Next, he reviewed
the criteria necessary for granting a variance.
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
February 3, 2004
Page 3 of5
Commissioner Gagne stated it would seem that to split the lot would make each lot smaller than those
currently existing in the neighborhood. Commissioner Woodruff agreed.
Commissioner Conley stated he was having difficulty understanding the hardship in this case. He
questioned Mr. Marso as to the positive implications with development of the property. Mr. Marso stated
the issues of drainage affecting his basement qualified as a hardship, as well as the quality of assessment
his property would receive in the future. Commissioner Conley explained the applicant's basement could
be elevated to ameliorate the drainage issues with the basement, and assessments would not change.
Commissioner Borkon stated, despite her usual stance on variance requests, she could not find any
substantiation for granting this variance. Chair Bailey agreed, noting he did not believe any of the
necessary criteria had been met in this case. He went on to explain others in the area had dealt with
drainage issues as well, and the house could be altered to avoid dealing with these issues in the future.
Reasonable use could be maintained; a previous owner had caused the problem with drainage related to
the walkout style home. He also noted the proposed plans for construction would not yield homes in the
style and character of the rest of the neighborhood, and it did not make sense to split the lot.
Borkon moved, Gagne seconded, Recommending the Request for Lot Size Variance for a Minor
Subdivision be denied, based on Staff Recommendations. Motion passed 5/0.
Mr. Marso stated he knew his chances for getting approval on the request was a long shot, however, he
requested any analysis be given to the applicant prior to this stage of the planning process. He also noted
it was imperative the Commission listen to applicants in entirety despite the time constraints noted as part
of the Agenda.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Hearing at 7:56 P.M.
2. FINDINGS OF FACT - MINOR SUBDIVISION/COMBINATION
Applicant: D.R. Verdorn (Rep. By Sharratt Design & Co.)
Location: 28210 and 28220 Woodside Road
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:57 P.M.
Director Nielsen briefly reviewed the case for the Commission noting the Planning Commission
discussed these issues at the January 6,2004 meeting, at which time Staff was directed to prepare findings
denying the application as presented. He went on to briefly review the history of the case noting Daryl
and Carol Verdorn, owned the property at 28210 Woodside Road. The Verdorns proposed splitting off
the southerly 11 feet of their lot and conveying it to their son, Jim, who owned the property immediately
south at 28220 Woodside Road. He went on to explain the northerly parcel contained 113,943 square feet
and was occupied by a single-family residence. The southerly parcel was substandard for the R-IA1S,
Single-family Residential/Shoreland zoning district, containing only 21,636 square feet, and was occupied
by a single-family residence. Access to both lots was gained by a private road that extended off of
Woodside Road.
The strip of land to be conveyed contained approximately 7004 square feet, which would bring the
southerly lot to 28,640 square feet. He noted it was the intent of the parties to bring the smaller lot up to
at least 70 percent of the R-IA1S lot area requirement that would make a lot buildable. The applicants
hoped to avoid having to obtain a variance in the event they would demolish the smaller house and
rebuild on the site.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
February 3, 2004
Page 4 of 5
Director Nielsen went on to explain that while it was understandable the property owners wished to
increase the size of the smaller lot to avoid future variances, gerrymandering of lot lines simply to achieve
area was not recommended. Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan specifically mentioned gerrymandered lot
lines and "flag lots" as problems to avoid in the subdivision of lots. To approve a subdivision as
proposed by the applicant would run contrary to and defeat the policies adopted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Although the II-foot strip added a little width to the smaller lot, the easterly 390 feet of the strip
did nothing to increase the "buildability" of the lot.
Director Nielsen explained a different alternative existed that accomplished what the applicants were
seeking. To simply pivot the property line from the northeast corner of the smaller lot, making it more
perpendicular to the shoreline, resulted in better lot design. The owner of the larger parcel had expressed
an unwillingness to adjust the lot line in this fashion because it reduced the length of shoreline for the
larger lot. Director Nielsen also noted the two lots as presented in the alternative form would be among
the widest lots on the Shorewood portion of Smithtown Bay.
Gagne moved, Woodruff seconded, Adopting the Findings of Fact Denying the Minor
Subdivision/Combination for D.R. Verdorn (Rep. By Sharratt Design & Co.), 28210 and 28220 .
Woodside Road. Motion passed 6/0.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Hearing at 8:03 P.M.
3. NOMINATE CHAIR AND CO-CHAIR FOR 2004
Gagne moved, Packard seconded, Nominating Jeff Bailey as Chair and Jim Pisula as Co-Chair of
the Planning Commission for the Year 2004.
The Commission complimented Chair Bailey and Co-Chair Pisula on a job well done in these positions
for the past year.
Motion passed 6/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
.
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
5. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
Director Nielsen stated a Planned Unit Development request and a Study Session including discussion of
the Comprehensive Plan, Work Plan, R-C District Amendments, and Signage and Lighting were slated
for the February 17, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Agenda.
6. REPORTS
· Liaison to Council
Commissioner Gagne reported on matters considered and actions taken at the January 26, 2004, Regular
City Council Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
Council Liaison Turgeon agreed to provide reports for the Commission and Council for the month of
February.
(
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
February 3, 2004
Page 5 of 5
· SLUC
No report was given.
· Other
None.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Gagne moved, Woodruff seconded, Adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of February 3,
2004, at 8:30 P.M. Motion passed 6/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Sally Keefe
Recording Secretary
..
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474.3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
28 January 2004
RE:
Verdom, Daryl, - Minor Subdivision
FILE NO.:
405(03.33)
BACKGROUND
.
Daryl and Carol Verdom own the property at 28210 Woodside Road (see Site Location
map - Exhibit A, attached). The Verdomspropose to split off the southerly 11 feet of
their lot and convey it to their son, Jim, who owns the property immediately south at
28220 Woodside Road. The proposed division and combination is illustrated on Exhibit
B, attached.
The northerly parcel contains 113,943 square feet and is occupied by a single-family
residence. The southerly parcel is substandard for the R-1NS, Single-family
ResidentiallShoreland zoning district, containing only 21,636 square feet. It is also
occupied by a single-family residence. Both lots are accessed by a private road that
extends off of Woodside Road.
The strip of land to be conveyed contains approximately 7004 square feet, which will
bring the southerly lot to 28,640 square feet. It is the intent of the parties to bring the
smaller lot up to at least 70 percent of the R-1NS lot area requirement that makes a lot
buildable. They hope to avoid having to obtain a variance in the event they demolish the
smaller house and rebuild.
ft
'0..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#8.A.
Memorandum .
Re: Verdorn - Minor Subdivision/Combination
28 January 2004
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
While it is understandable that the property owners wish to increase the size of the
smaller lot to avoid future variances, gerrymandering of lot lines simply to achieve area is
not recommended. Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan specifically mentions
gerrymandered lot lines and "flag lots" as problems to avoid in the subdivision of lots.
To approve a subdivision as proposed by the applicant would run contrary to and defeat
the policies adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Although the II-foot strip adds a little
width to the smaller lot, the easterly 390 feet of the strip does nothing to increase the
buildability of the lot.
.
A different alternative exists that accomplishes what the applicants are seeking. Exhibit
C simply pivots the property line from the northeast comer of the smaller lot, making it
more perpendicular to the shoreline, resulting in better lot design. The owner of the
larger parcel has expressed an unwillingness to adjust the lot line in this fashion because
it reduces the length of shoreline for the larger lot. It may be worth mentioning that the
two lots as shown on Exhibit C would be among the widest lots on the Shorewood
portion of Smithtown Bay.
These issues were discussed by the Planning Commission at its 6. January 2004 meeting,
at which time staff was directed to prepare findings denying the application as presented.
.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Larry Brown
Daryl and Carol Verdom
Michael Sharratt
-2-
tr
f
.
tr
W
Q
...
..
~
UJZ
5 ~Z~
Z
Z
-
~
+0
C1)
..... .....
u1::
C1) C1)
..... e..
.co
:::s a-
cne..
Qj
8. ~
8
It)
o
It)
N
"___a'll<
n.. A __
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Verdoom Minor Subdivision
o
~.....
1" .-".\" "
"~1 "
,.... I
, \
I =t
, "of
~- I;
~4 II
Ii:! l
wi i
\
z
o
-
tn"
-
>
-
Q
I-
o
......
.,---
{1
o .
-z"....
~"\i'
7.
lIjj"
jH :!!$ PH!
de. e8.
~..~ ~~ ~~
j~l .t.t t.t
I_ i.;& !;Ill! h
51'~ .. ail !{i
'/; '/;
U€! i ~;. ~ii
ail! t...
..
I!
I~
....
<..)
\
\
\
\
\
\
l=4
\
II I
I I
\
I, ,.
\
,'" \
r..... (r.. \
'-- -1-
(.) ,..--.-
-r .. _--I
O:::~ It
1-- Iler' I"
R~ I
ill II"
::i
II
1
,sf~~f.!~.
%$;;
l~
~"
:~':;~~~ ~
!JJ:'
~rf
p....
Ie'"
-- :c
-----........1
- ..!:~ 2 b .a
i! t~j .~ A i
-..-S i;1 '/; ~ :
fl:d i .. !
~~ ~~ I; i i
~ ;,.f ; If ~t.
l!I Ail: s i ~ . J.
il t.. ,..1 1 It! I
'/;;ti I F' I S l!l I
l:&-! ~l:& 'i 1 ! ll.
l~j .~:l.a ~ F'
";~1 E!j t t '/; I i
~~.. Ii; ! 'i I "l!.{
I<lS '/;0111 'i & r ~
~!t ii~ ~ 1 i i i 1
!I! -FB ~ < L" i;
I'/;! !If :; i i I '" i
] I" Ii! ~ i i ~ ! i
I 1ft !t1 1 .. t ~ l.t
~ii Is' ] ill e ~
11: ill 1 ~ ~] ; ~
liE I t:'C ~ -:: -I 4 i
:I ~~i ;i!f ! f I ~ I
! .fi "=~j .. I Ii lI' I &
I ;:\jll 1:'lj ~ ~ f i~ .I f
I !:ll I ~1!1 i i ! c ..1 I ~ c
..! I .:1 .& I ~
.;~~;t~'/; ~ "0='0181 ~ i
!:iJUi ~!fi!;I:!I f ;
l!im ~. J!l~ ~t t
];J.snt !'O!!.&!ui A:r;!f
I U)~ii! lli~m~ Ii ~~
:~t..tIl1 :lIJ 11'011 H ~!~
~ ~!~il!li l~ li:1i -'0 ~l&
~ ~i}it~Ei ..i~Jlii~ Ii if'/;
Ilo.!llSl1lj 1.......1",5 j <I <1
I i:illlIi ~ ~:Iil!it; i is 11&
I!
II
If
lilll
.....
l
CI-
~
9
~
o
~
z
:z
3
ci
i
~
lJi
'J.&
. Id
IIBI
JEll
fl!i
!~i
1..~ ,~
~i Efl
~~
. Ill..
.I I:
II Ii
~I k d
-fi1
1
I
~
! 1
\. .."""''''
! II i.1
g ~ fill
a it ii! ~
~ ii Ih I
Exhibit B
" .JlI'
11 U'" :1' 1> ..
i:3 g~ .:I J J
fi ~n i,!i
~ n~ l~' I ~
As ;~l ~ f i _:I ~ .
il W' f i I 2
;!j ltl I ~ i i:l-
f ~d ; i a i I
J~ J;ars J 1 f 41
.:Ih ,~!:l t f; t {
'&:5) :5 h .l
III '1;.;1 ,I f t ] of
:11 ~~=-Io i : 1 ~ IIi:
.!!~! or! &"
-1- .. !# - _ ~
.. dj.. l!l - _
~~! i-I i ! i ~ of f
I !~i ].il I!; ~ ! 1
VI 11.; ] i t t ! I
'".s 'N! 1 ~ ~ .I ~ J!
I !~!1 .i!If !jl1 ~1
I 'Cil '&.:1 1 i & r i' &
::l.~ 1:S- oC,I Q" j
J:il I illi 'I ! 1 I Ii ~ & i
L
Iii '
-1'"1"
fats
I J ~~t
ii!;~
d:!
U ?Jill
eee!
~;! ;!~
it<< <<$
~lll ~$
aa ti
i Ii. Iii
-.--.--.......-
..
I!
II
\
'-
o !..
I,!
./
"'-"'.....
~ri t ;^o.\: 0
~~I
r I
I ~I
I ..Il
f Cl
'b'~ I;
I; "
!f~ ~
a !
~
o
13
z
z
::i
o
~,
It:
o
I ifi
I J
o .11
. . [1
.J I ... . jO '& Itl~ll
oSt,-;:;e~ ~ -;;'I;j:l l 1: J"
!Jf Ii ~Ui! i l '& ~:' i
1~1~ ja2IJ~ !t ~ .,~~ fl.e
I !tl~'it ]!.Il']rs! U i1 '; ,lill
I,J;sj! i'l~m~ !i ~ ';'~ ..
1~I~lRi ~!I~!!'&~t Ii all ~
11,11111) li.lS!:bl oS'& III ..; ,h~ ,a
lli'&fa~ .. ~dlll# n t;: ~ ~i
n I i "'I"! j oCt 01 "'0;
i:iidli I J~tllh~ I !i all ' . i a
fi ~I
. l' d
\
",
'<~,
" ..,
Z ' .:::-..... '"
o '
-
(/) .'
-
>
-
Q
I-
o
~
1--
(.,)
or.
i
~ r~
..- I o.
.......
! {
\.
"
~ ~
..( ~
iIc'
_ /1
__ 1e1O
_I --_ 4r
~ -_I
.--"
=(~
--z..t-
,~~
I ill
7L
;I~ill
COIII!I.
j il! 0
elf ~I"
~ ii ~ ! I
(^ JJ
"I ~
J. I ~.
Q' J>. ._A :
III
cya:.
~ ~----
44'tl.Oi- I
Ii __ I
Exhibit C
.
.
d~sitt n~
gcompany
October 8,2003
Zoning/Subdivision Application
28210 Woodside Road, Shorewood
PIN: 31-117-23-31-0027
Reg. Land Survey No. 1099
28220 Woodside Road
PIN: 31-117-23-31-0012
Reg. Land Survey No. 740
The Verdoorn families request to divide a portion of this lot in order "to permit the adding
of a parcel of land to an abutting lot so that no additional lots are created and all new lots
conform to the Zoning Code minimum lot size standards." Section 1202.08
The Verdoorn families own both parcels at 28210 Woodside Road and 28220 Woodside
Road. There are currently existing structures on each lot. The Owner is requesting a
portion of 28210 Woodside Road be subdivided and added to 28220 Woodside Road so
that 28220 Woodside Road conforms to the City of Shorewood minimum lot standards.
They are requesting that 6,094 square feet from the southerly portion of 28210 Woodside
Road, a tract 11 feet by 554 feet, be added to 28220 Woodside Road as shown on the
attached survey.
With the approval of this subdivision, 28220 Woodside Road would have an area of
28,179 square feet, bringing it to 70.4% of the minimum lot size standards, as required for
previously permitted lots of record. The lot at 28210 Woodside Road would be 108,199
square feet and remain well above the minimum lot size standard after the subdivision
and remain in full zoning code conformance. Both parcels will also exceed minimum
lakeshore requirements.
The proposed legal descriptions pending City subdivision concept approval.
464 Second Street Suite 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 952.470.9750 Fax: 952.470.8407
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT
REGARDING VERDOORN MINOR SUBDIVISION/COMBINATION
WHEREAS, Sharratt Design & Company (Applicant), representing Daryl and Carol
Verdoom - the owners of property located at 28210 Woodside Road (the northerly lot), proposes
to subdivide said property in order to convey approximately an II-foot strip ofland to James
Verdoom, the owner of the property at 28220 Woodside Road (the southerly lot); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that the City approve a minor subdivision and
combination, allowing the conveyance of the II-foot strip; and
.
WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its regular
meeting on 6 January 2004 and, after deliberation, the Planning Commission recommended
denial of the requested division and combination;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission ofthe City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The properties at 28210 (the northerly lot) and 28220 (the southerly lot) Woodside Road
are located in an R-IA/S, Single-Family Residential/Shoreland zoning district. .
2. The Shorewood Zoning Code requires that lots in an R-IA/S zoning district be at least
40,000 square feet in area and 120 feet wide at the front building setback line.
.
3. The northerly lot contains 113,943 square feet of area and is occupied by a single-family
residential dwelling.
4. The southerly lot is also occupied by a single-family residence and contains 21,636
square feet of area, which does not conform to the minimum size requirements of the
Shorewood Zoning Code.
5. The applicant has expressed the owner's intent to reconfigure the lot in order to rebuild
the home on the southerly lot.
6. The applicant proposes to convey approximately 7004 square feet from the northerly lot
to the southerly lot.
7. The lot configuration proposed by the applicant does not comply with the width
requirements of the R-IA/S zoning district.
.
.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Shorewood Subdivision Ordinance recognizes the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan
as the policy guide for the regulation ofland use and the development ofland.
2. The Comprehensive Plan (para. 4, pg. LU-27) states:
"As smaller pieces of land are resubdivided, lot configurations become a problem.
Backlot divisions, flag lots and gerrymandered property lines undermine the benefits of
building setbacks and disrupt continuity of open spaces. All subdivisions, regardless of
size, should adhere to good planning and design principles."
3. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposed division and combination results
in a gerrymandered lot configuration that does not substantially improve the buildability
of the southerly lot.
4. The Planning Commission recommends that the Applicant's request for a minor
subdivision and combination hereby be denied.
ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
3rd day of February 2004.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
Jeff Bailey, Planning Commission Chair
-2-
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
'i
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE:
February 19, 2004
RE: Report Regarding 5550-5560Shorewood Lane and the South Lake Minnetonka Public
Safety Facility
On January 12,2004, Mr. Vanderlinde, owner of property located at 5550-60 Shorewood Lane,
appeared before the City Council voicing concern over the excess dirt that was placed on the north side
of the Public Safety Building.
After consideration by the City Council, the task set before staff was to review drainage for the site,
and to insure that the construction of the site portion of the project met standards regarding grading and
contract change orders.
Drainae:e
The north and east sides of the Public Safety site were reviewed with regard to drainage. While the
relief of the slope is dramatic, there remains a swale located on the public safety site to insure that
drainage from the slope is directed to the north. This drainage does not impact the back yards of those
properties along.Shorewood Lane.
Drainage from the site is collected in the stormwater basin along the LRT on the northeast quadrant of
the Public Works property. This drainage ultimately drains to Tonka Bay.
Slopes
Of particular concern is the discussion regarding the rate of the slope on the north and east side of the
site.
It should be noted that the public safety facility was designed and constructed utilizing the consulting
engineer brought on board by the project architect. This firm is Anderson Johnson and Associates.
After review of this issue, it was determined that it was prudent to bring in an outside source from the
project to document/survey the north and east slopes to determine the grade of the slope and the
ft
....1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
=tt9A
.
.
Mayor and City Council
SLMPSS Grading
February 19, 2004
Page 2 of2
amount of material in excess from the original grading plan. Since WSB and Associates is the City of
Shorewood's consultant for other projects, it was brought on board to perform this asbuilt survey.
Attachment 1 is the plans generated for the site. Shown on the drawing are 3 sets of contours. They
include the original ground prior to construction, originally proposed grades, and what is actually
constructed. It should be noted that Mr. Vanderlinde met City Engineer, Brown and the surveyors on
site the day of the survey to address any questions.
. WSB has surveyed the site and determined that the slope meets a 3:1 slope. This meets the City's
standards for construction. It should be noted that a 3: 1 is accepted without exception, a 2: 1 slope
is accepted where a Landscape Architect certifies that the slope is adequately stabilized.
. WSB has calculated the difference in what was originally proposed and what was built is 8050
cubic yards. This would take approximately 800 dump truck loads to remove.
Contract Administration
The decision to dispose ofthe excess material on the North side of the public safety site was made as a
change order to the contract by the governing boards of the tenants of the Public Safety Facility.
Ultimately, the Shorewood EDA facilitates that decision. Certainly, each municipality has a
representative assigned to serve on this committee.
The question has been asked if a change order to the contract, such as disposal of the dirt, follows
normal operating procedures for such a contract. Staff's response is that change orders to contracts,
which impact the looks and function of the project, are routinely conducted without pausing
construction for public response. If the change resulted in a use different from the Conditional Use
Permit issued, construction would be halted and reconsidered by the Planning Commission and City
Council. Such is not the case in this instance. The grading, drainage and conformance to the City's
standards for construction have been met.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, JANUARY 12,2004
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7 :07 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Turgeon, and Zerby; Administrator
Dawson; Attorney Keane; and Finance Director Burton
Absent:
Engineer Brown and Planning Director Nielsen
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda for the evening. Administrator Dawson requested Item 9E,
Appointment to the Minnetonka Community Education Services (MCES) Board, be added to the Agenda. .
Lizee moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, December 8, 2003
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
December 8, 2003, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
B. City Council Work Session Minutes, December 8, 2003
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of
December 8, 2003, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
C. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, December 30, 2003
Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of
December 30, 2003, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and
Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
.
.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 12,2004
Page 2 of 6
B. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-001, "A Resolution Setting the 2004 City Council
Regular Meeting Dates for the City of Shorewood."
C. Establishing the Date, Time and Place for the Local Board of Review
D. Staffing - No action required
E. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-002. "A Resolution Approving a License for Tree
Trimming Service."
F. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-003, "A Resolution Setting the 2004 License,
Permit, Service Charges and Miscellaneous Fees."
G. Approval to Enter Into an Agreement for Recycling Services
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Robert Gagne, 24850 Amlee Road, thanked the Council and City Staff for its efforts with the Opt-Out
Transit decision making process that enabled the Metro Mobility buses and office space to be moved to
Spring Park, Minnesota. He stated it was especially nice that the buses could have indoor storage during
the winter months. He went on to explain the decision to "Opt Out" of the Metropolitan Council busing
opportunities had allowed for additional monies to be able to extend bus service, routes, and schedules
for seniors in the South Lake Minnetonka area. He again thanked the Council stating he was very happy
with the end result. .
Mayor Love thanked Met Council for its negotiation efforts in this matter that worked to meet the needs
of South Lake Minnetonka residents.
5. REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A.
Park Commissioner Appreciation
Mayor Love stated it was with great appreciation and pleasure that the City was able to present to Nancy
Palesch, and to Scott Bartlett (who was not able to be present this evening), with plaques of appreciation
for serving on the City's Park Commission. He noted serving on the Park Commission demonstrated a
generosity of volunteer spirit. Ms. Palesch thanked the City for the plaque and the opportunity to serve
on the Park Commission. She stated she had enjoyed this opportunity a great deal and was sorry she was
not able to fulfill her term. Mayor Love stated the City deeply appreciated the time she spent serving on
the Park Commission, and noted the City would forward Mr. Bartlett's plaque to him.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
There were no public hearings scheduled for this evening.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 12, 2004
Page 3 of 6
7. PARKS
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held December 9, 2003
Commissioner Gilbertson reported on matters considered and actions taken at the December 9, 2003,
Park Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
Councilmember Turgeon questioned whether a vision plan had been presented by the Park Foundation
regarding the bricks to be utilized in the Buy-A-Brick Program. She noted people had not yet received
letters of thanks and acknowledgement regarding past brick purchases, and wondered if the plans for the
program were still moving forward.
8. PLANNING
Commissioner Gagne reported on matters considered and actions taken at the January 6, 2004, Planning
Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
A. Request by Mr. Vanderlinde regarding 5550-60 Shorewood Lane and Public Safety
Building
Administrator Dawson explained Mr. Vanderlinde owned property at 5550-5560 Shorewood Lane
adjacent to the West Public Safety Facility, and had expressed concern in November of 2003 for certain
activities taking place during the construction phase of the Public Safety Facility. He went on to explain
Mr. Vanderlinde had requested clarification on certain construction aspects of the facility. These
answers had been supplied to Mr. Vanderlinde and a series of meetings and discussions had taken place
with staff since November. Mr. Vanderlinde had requested the opportunity to address Council on this
matter and was now prepared to do so this evening.
Allan Vanderlinde, owner of 5550-5560 Shorewood Lane, stated he had viewed the preconstruction plans
for the West Side Facility and had noted minimal impacts to his property. As construction progressed on
the site, a large pile of dirt had been placed on the northerly side of the site. On October 10, 2003, he
noticed trees were being planted on this pile, and was notified the pile of dirt would remain. He
questioned Council on the process utilized in making this decision and wondered how this change in
plans was handled as part of the process. He further stated he was concerned as the pile of dirt was
approximately 22 feet high and extended 130 feet out from the building. He noted the original plans
noted a slope should begin approximately 30 feet from the building and this was not the case currently.
Additionally, he stated Director Nielsen had noted a slope of 3:1 should be maintained throughout the
City in instances like this one; however, Mr. Vanderlinde had measured it personally, and believed it was
in excess of this City standard.
Mr. Vanderlinde stated he believed the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department and the Fire District
did a great job of providing services to area residents, and he had no issue with those departments. He
further stated if a person looked at the building from the south, it was a beautiful view of the building and
landscaping on the site; however, if a person looked from the north side of the building to the south, the
view was one a massive pile of dirt that was not supposed to be there as part of the originally approved
plans. He requested the City provide assistance in this matter and follow the original plan.
Mayor Love stated a site visit would be in order with City Staff as the site needed to meet all City
standards. He went on to state he was aware of the decision made to leave the dirt on the site as he
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 12, 2004
Page 4 of 6
served on the EFD and SLMPD governing boards. He questioned whether Mr. Vanderlinde had had
positive experiences in working with City Staff on previous site issues. Mr. Vanderlinde responded
affirmatively, and despite the issue that remained, he had received answers to his inquiries. He stated it
was very frustrating to see the work continue on the site when he had expressed concern earlier in the
process.
Administrator Dawson stated the City wanted to be certain City standards were applied in this case. He
stated there had always been plans to keep excess soil on the site as part of the grading plan; however,
there were approximately 2500-3000 additional cubic yards beyond the initial plan. He stated the
decision had been made in the fall to move forward with seeding and trees to avoid erosion of materials
on site throughout the winter season. Notification to the neighbors was not given as the work needed to
be completed quickly due to the onset of winter. He noted the additional landscaping to be an aesthetic
improvement from the bare soil, and the City wanted the neighbors to be pleased with the result. To that
end, a survey would be needed to verify the slope on the site within the next week or two. Mr.
Vanderlinde stated he would like to be present at the time the survey work was being completed.
Administrator Dawson stated he would report on this matter at the February 23, 2004, Regular City
Council meeting.
Councilmember Zerby stated he was quite sympathetic to Mr. Vanderlinde's concerns, as he did not see
the actions taken in working on this site as being a "good neighbor." He stated he would like to see the
situation rectified and would like to see a compromise for all that would balance the economics of
situation with the aesthetics owed to the adjoining neighbors.
Councilmember Turgeon stated she would like Engineer Brown to verify the drainage on the site, given
that dirt pile was composed mainly of clay. Also, she stated she would like to see the issue remedied as
soon as possible.
Mayor Love assured Mr. Vanderlinde no special exceptions had been made for the City in this case, and
it was imperative for government to meet its own standards. He appreciated Mr. Vanderlinde's
willingness to work with City Staff on this matter to work through his concerns.
9. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Making Appointments to Certain Offices and Positions within the City of
Shorewood for the Year 2004
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 04-004, "A Resolution Making
Appointments to Certain Offices and Positions within the City of Shorewood for the Year 2004:'
Motion passed 5/0.
B. Making the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD} Board Representative
Appointment
Mayor Love stated it had been a pleasure to interview candidates for representation to the LMCD, the
LMCC, and the MCES earlier this evening. He noted he was always very impressed with the level of
enthusiasm for volunteering demonstrated as part of interview process with the exceptional candidates.
He stated he was deeply appreciative of the willingness of the candidates to volunteer their time and
talents on these boards on behalf of the City. He thanked all participants in the interview process.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Shorewood Parks Foundation
DATE: February 19, 2004
SUBJECT: Nomination to Board of Directors
The by-laws of the Shorewood Parks Foundation provide that the Board of Directors nominates
candidates to serve on the Board, and that the City Council affirms the appointments. With the
reorganization of the Foundation that occurred in 2001, the Council approved a staggered schedule of
terms for board members. The Board may have seven to nine members. The Board of Directors
currently has eight members. There is a vacancy for the director from the Park Commission,
although Paula Callies is seining as a liaison from the Commission.
Two terms are expiring on Febniary 29: those of Jim Eddy and Don Kelly. They have served nearly
three years in the initial staggering of ternls for director positions.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board of Directors of the Shorewood Parks Foundation nominates Don Kelly to serve as
director through February 28, 2007.
The Board Chair had not been able to confirm whether Jim Eddy wishes to continue to serve as a
director. If Mr. Eddy does wish to continue, the nomination will be forwarded to the City Council as
soon as possible. If he does not wish to continue, the Board would have the minimum number of
directors called for it its by-laws.
With these terms of office, there would be three directors' terms expiring February 28, 2005; three
terms expiring February 28, 2006; and two terms (one now vacant) expiring February 28, 2007.
_~ 9 ~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 508 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE
RELATING TO ADOPTION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1: Chapter 508 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby repealed and the following is
adopted in its place:
SECTION:
508.01: Puzpose
508.02: Codes Adopted by Reference
508.03: Fire Code Optional Chapters
508.04: Application, Administration and Enforcement
508.05: Violations and Penalties
508.01: PURPOSE: The puzpose of this code is to establish the minimum requirements
consistent with nationally recognized good practice for providing a reasonable level of life safety
and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and
existing buildings, structures and premises.
508.02: CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE: The 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code
(MSFC), which is based on the 2000 edition of the International Fire Code (IFC), including all of
the amendments, rules and regulations established, adopted and published from time to time, is
hereby adopted by reference with the exception of the optional chapters, unless specifically
adopted in this Ordinance. The 2003 Mim~esota State Fire Code is hereby incorporated in this
Ordinance as if fully set out herein.
508.03: FIRE CODE OPTIONAL CHAPTERS: The Minnesota State Fire Code,
established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 299F.011 allows the City to adopt by reference and
enforce certain optional chapters of the most current edition of the Minnesota State Fire Code.
The following optional provisions identified in the most current edition of the State Fire Code
are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the fire code for the City of Shorewood:
a. Appendix A, Board of Appeals, International Fire Code TFC 2000;and
b. Appendix B, Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings, IFC 2000; and
c. Appendix C, Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution, IFC 2000; and
d. Appendix D, Fire Apparatus Access Roads, IFC 2000; and
e. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard No.72, 2000 edition,
National Fire Alarm Code.
~ 9. C.
508.04: APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT. The
application, administration, and enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Miiulesota
State Building Code. The code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by
Mimnesota Statute, 299F.011, Subdivision 4, when so established by this Ordinance.
The code enforcement agency of the City of Shorewood is called Excelsior Fire District.
508.05: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor
(Mimnesota statutes 299F.011, Subdivision 6).
Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, this 23rd day of
February, 2004.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
t
CONTOURS AS
GRADED X °~
/ / I 3:1 SLOPES
~_---~96
pr = ~ ~
£ S ~
~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
`` ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ \_ I , o ~r sa ao ~$ g
1
I ~ ~~
~. ~
~~ \ p~1 ` ~ ADDITIONAL VOLUME ADDED ~~~~ ~ ~
\ ( TO ORIGINAL GRADING PLAN ~~~~ ~
~ \\ ~~~q~~ $~. \ ~ I 8050 CY ~ a~ a
~ A .9
.•<.
~1 -=~~ ' I
i~ __
~~~
`I - -
976 ~ ~ I J a Z ~
`, ~ --- 9 ~ ' W o w
= ~ ; _-~~ ,l I ~~ ~ ~ o
~a ~
11 W V
81, q
r ,9 ~~i
a ~ ~
' '~£'-- 81.1
~ ~~ ~ 88,0 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ $
~~ ~ ,
~BB,O ~ z~~ ~~
_ ~ ~~
CONTOURS IIII ~ ~ ~ ~~
a LL
,~ AS PER ~ ~ IIII = g ~
GRADING PL N~ I I I i ~ S
~~ i_ 88,0 ~ ~
i
l9sr_6 ST-1L, IIII.: ~°n
b~ v
BB.A
87.6 81,9
__.._._. ~ i•
-ee,o ~'
9es
ae,o n a
eas
~eLO ' ar.r r\ PROJECT NUMBER A5 BUILT GRADING SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
M;11074~8901Cad11074•AS BIUL'f GRAOING.dwg