032403 CC Reg AgP
" ill
.,F'
:-.,.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2003
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor l4ve _
Garfunkel
Lizee
Zerby _
Turgeon _
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, March 10, 2003 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions
Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from
Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.-#3A Claims List)
B. Approval of Expenditure of Funds for a Print Controller (Att.-#3C Deputy Clerk's
memorandum)
C. Vine Street/Manor Road Property (Att.-#3D Planning Director's memorandum, Revised
Resolution)
Applicant: Randall Cermak
Location: 20150 Vine Street
D. Approval of Final Plat - Spruce Hill 2nd Addition (Att.#3E Draft Resolution)
Applicant: Strategic Holdings, me.
Location: Northwest quadrant of Spruce Hill Court and Yellowstone Trail
E. Request for Vacation of Undeveloped Street Right-of-Way - Enchanted Point (Att.-#3F
Resolution)
Applicant: Rick and Carrie Halvorson
Location: 4495 Enchanted Lane
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken
'" it
.(
')0
'.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - March 24, 2003
PAGE 2 OF3
s. PARKS - Report by Representative
"4
A. Report onPark Commission Meeting Held March 11, 2003 (Att.-#5A Draft Minutes)
B. Dog Ordinance Amendment (Att.-#5B Public Works Director's memorandum, Draft
Ordinance)
6. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Concept, Development Stage and Final Plan -Shorewood Village P.U.D. (Revised Final
Plat) (Att.#6A Planning Director's memorandum, Draft Resolution)
Applicant: Shorewood Village, Inc.
Location: Shorewood Shopping Center
B. Conditional Use Permit for Multiple Signage (see Planning Director's memorandum
#6A)
Applicant:
Location:
Shorewood Village, Inc.
Shorewood Shopping Center
C. Development Stage Approval- High Ponte P.U.D. (Att.#6C Planning Director's
memorandum)
Applicant: Lecy Construction
Location: 23520/23570 State Highway 7
D. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet (Att. #6D
Planning Director's memorandum, Draft Resolution)
Applicant: Steve Hanson
Location: 28105 Boulder Bridge Drive
E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezoning - Capestone Ponds P.U.D. (Att. #6E
Planning Director's memoranda, City Engineer's memorandum)
Applicant: Capestone Builders, Inc.
Location: 20775 Manor Road (Carmichael Auto Salvage)
7. GENERAL/NEW BUSINESS
A. Set joint meeting with Park Commission and Planning Commission
B. Resolution regarding Suburban Hennepin Courts (Att.-#7B Resolution)
8. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Smithtown Road Discussion (Att. #8A Public Works Director memorandum)
. <'
\..
~
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - March 24, 2003
PAGE30F3
9. REPORTS.
A. Administrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Intersection
2. Public Safety Facilities
3. Gideon Glen
B. Mayor & City Council
10. ADJOURN
::-...~.-..-
......;.. - "-- .
\.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 24, 2003
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
For the record, please nrint your name and address below. Thank you.
Name
Address
1. Crb \~ \c-~ n v-rf
2. (IJdi~ ~ev
3. \JO'f\ f\ ()- ~ ol~t-J
d(oI00 ~n1f+h+t)Wn J?rt .
d-(P6w~ ~lth-ftJU4^ 4h-L./
~ b J OD",<)<<) 1+ h-tbGO (\ A o~_
4. LOIn. <-.z () U 1Tsch.
'J.{,/oo 5M,''/J.)/QlAJ^ ~.
~'B 013 Mcf,J,l,t 1T 2~0 '1<; Sit l nfi1JW^/ ~
.
\ .")
6. ':"~ ~ 0 \ S~ ') ~ Sf) f1 ~ S \i'<'~\ \: ~ -"( c..J"LU1.. ') ~.f)
7. Ed Lt9;vc/T .:75 <JCJo 5hu7h /t/Wft/ Br:J d
8. ~\~ L",~,hL ~.<)/'~D \1,i}~~~ ~Ot).-/
9. filll? D// l/l/?TiR :24'5'5' 0
5/h1)~ +owV\ Ro~
10.01+ () Lv tt y J Llo /) AT' J 57 t-o 5 --?u ,','1 l'oL./ IV /( cI
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 24, 2003
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
For the record, please orint your name and address below. Thank you.
Name
Address
1. 17/)1/ ~v2 f L~
" /
/"? !
"" ,if' I
f' " ?
2.~1<(4'/'I lei I C f/GIV/IJ. k
L)7D} )JHIf)~~ NIf11
(;;Lo /:;-0 V I N (' S V
U ~lL(\U [~k(~ r~e ~
4. PiWL UJA/:;,J.1#-
( ~
5. :;!l~(7~
6. fU LA ~ I1LJ t\ ~/M .:) 10 ~ l (J S 1\\ rh, \uw rd~
7. ~ tJ.)~ /)678cJ SV'1,-tAtoVOuVl M.
8. J! t/ oJ d f d '/0. tJ N & 5;;>').,0 5" .p r I r] q C J'rc le-
T ; r
.~79 lkJl~ lA .. .
;;)5 ;).10 ~l\ ITh -f'v'WK RJ
':J- 7 :l (/) () c:s M\ ~-h:nJf\ Rd .
~~'5'{;/ ~/~~_ e.~
279?O jn,/J4tiv~1 ft'/
9. ::r~~~ Jdirk
10. \)tJ~ b~
\
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 24, 2003
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
For the record, please print your name and address below. Thank you.
Name
Address
L-
2. '\600 ~~V\SOtN
"v .N IJ11
530 N. 5'(ZO .5T~ 57LS]Q y\-1f'LS S Y<}O (
3.~k- ::;(0e"'7~ oZC;;-)((Qo S"",~-kw", R~
4. Ji~ thJe~ mqro ~~~ /2J
5.~ ~1~ StmJ~Vi.
6. ~ ~ t)1{tJ'PJ 2/ct4Lf S~'",hfO~ eA -
7. ~f Glt~
'~~8.o/CJ
S M, ,:f!:..7L>tJh !2 J -
. .
.. ..
~ "'" .
,
, ~ \ .
l . . .
8.
9. !.
, ,
;' t
,
10.
.
\..
'rI
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 24 March 2003
A Joint Meeting with the LCEC is scheduled for 6:00 PM this evening
Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3B: This item is a request for expenditure of funds for a Print Controller, the
communications hardware needed to network the PC used for the creating the newsletter
and other communications pieces to the existing Duplicator. The original print controller
was specific for the MacIntosh computer; so when the MacIntosh computer was upgraded
to the current PC, the direct connection to the Duplicator was lost. Staff has been using a
manual process for preparing the pages for printing, which is not only time intensive, but
also affects the layout and print quality of the communications piece. A print controller
that will work best with our PC and Desktop publishing software has become available
for purchase. This item is identified in the 2003 budget.
Agenda Item #3C:, The City Council agreed to convey 15 feet of City-owned property to
Randall Cermak (20150 Vine Street) in exchange for 17 feet of right-of-way across the
front of the Cermak property. The original resolution did not include the City's end of
that bargain. A revised resolution is enclosed for your approval.
Agenda Item #3D: Strategic Holdings, Inc. has submitted a final plat for a lot split that was
approved at the last Council meeting. Subject to City Attorney review and approval of
the driveway easement across the new lot, staff recommends approval of the fmal plat. A
resolution t? that effect is enclosed for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3E: This resolution approves a partial street vacation at the northerly end of
Enchanted Point. The Council agreed to the vacation, subject to the City retaining a
drainage and utility easement over the subject vacated area. The adjoining property
n
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
"
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 24 March 2003
Page 2 of3
owners will also dedicate additional easement for the existing sanitary sewer located on
their property. The attached resolution requires a simple majority vote.
Agenda Item #5A , Mary Lou Meyer will be present this evening to report on the March 11
Park Commission meeting.
Agenda Item #5B: The Park Commission is recommending changes to the Dog Ordinance, to
include a requirement that dogs be on a leash, not longer than 6 feet, while in public
parks, on all trails, sidewalks, and on the Southwest Regional LR T Trail. It also is
recommending that the person having custody of the dog must have in hislher possession
a device for removal of dog feces. In addition, the person having custody of the dog is
responsible for disposing of the pet feces in a sanitary manner. A copy of the existing
ordinance, with the proposed changes underlined, as well as a draft ordinance is attached
for Council's consideration.
Agenda Item #6A:, Shorewood Village Center, Inc. proposes to replat the shopping center into .
two lots so ,that CUB Foods can own its own land. This proposal apparently is driven by
requirements ofthe financing institutions for the project. Since a zero lot line will result,
and the two owners will share required parking and signage, the request has been
processed as a P.D.D. The main concern with this request is to ensure that both parcels
will remairl subject to the development agreement that was already executed for the
project. To this end the City Attorney has drafted an amendment to the original
agreement. The Planning Commission agreed with the staff report that recommends
approval of the revisions. The enclosed resolution requires simple majority approval.
Agenda Item #6B: Shorewood Village Center, Inc. has submitted plans for the signage that
will be displayed for the new CUB Foods store. A new (long overdue) pylon sign for the
center is also included in the request. Subject to the pylon sign being reduced in height,
the sign plan is consistent with City Code and with the direction given the developer
when the project was approved. The Planning Commission agreed with staff .
recommendation to approve the plan. The Council should direct staffto prepare a
resolution with findings of fact, approving a conditional use permit for multiple signage.
Agenda Item #6C:.' Having previously received Concept Stage Approval for a three-lot
subdivision known as High Pointe, Lecy Construction has submitted Development Stage
Plans (preliminary plat) for the project. The Planning Commission recommends approval
subject to staff recommendations. The Commission also recommends restrictions on
construction traffic relative to the use of the service road owned and maintained by Our
Savior's Church to the east. Approval of the request requires a simple majority vote by
the Council.
Agenda Item #OD: Steve Hanson proposes to add additional attached garage space on his
property at'28105 Boulder Bridge Drive. The new garage will put the property over 1200
square feet of area, requiring a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission
recommended unanimously to approve the C.D.P., subject to the applicant reducing the
-..fi
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 24 March 2003
J Page 3 of 3
amount of driveway surface on the property reducing the nonconformity of impervious
surface on the property.
Agenda Item #6E: - Having previously continued the public hearing for Capestone Ponds
P.D.D., the Planning Commission has now recommended approval of a Comprehensive
Plan amendment and Concept Stage plans for a 24-unit twinhome project to be developed
on the Carmichael Auto Salvage Yard property. The developer has begun the
environmental exploration (Phase I and Phase II) and will prepare a work plan for
cleaning up existing pollution on the site. The work plan is subject to the requirements of
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The Planning Commission's recommendation
includes a statement that the increased density being approved is subject to the provision
of City services (e.g., municipal water) to the site. The Council should direct staff to
prepare an -amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and a resolution relative to the
Concept Plan approval.
.
Agenda Item #7 A: _ The Council has made it a priority to meet with the Park Commission and
Planning Commission to discuss 2003 work programs early in the year, and to have a
follow-up meeting later. The Park Commission has suggested that there be one joint
meeting involving the Council and both advisory commissions. Staffhas identified
alternative dates in April that the Council may meet with the commissions individually,
or with the commissions together.
.
Agenda Item #7B: The Hennepin District Court has identified closure of suburban courts as a
budget m~agement measure, in part in response to anticipated reductions in State
funding. The Police Chief and City Prosecutor have noted several negative impacts (in
terms of costs and service levels) that may result if the Ridgedale court were closed.
Additionally, the District Court has been unilateral in identifying alternatives; prosecutors
and police chiefs would like the District Court to work cooperatively in examining
alternatives. A resolution stating the Council's opposition to the potential closure and its
call for a cooperative examination of alternatives has been prepared.
Agenda Item #8A: At the March loth City Council meeting, the City Council directed Staff to
provide an update at the following Council meeting with regard to the right of way
process, and to provide a description or graphics demonstrating the impacts to properties
along Smithtown Road. In addition, information regarding the decision to place the
walkway along the north side of Smithtown is also provided in this report.
~
...
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2003
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1.
DRAFT
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee (arrived at 7:02 P.M.), Turgeon, and
Zerby; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane (arrived at 7:08 P.M.); Engineer Brown;
and Planning Director Nielsen
Absent:
Finance Director Burton
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda. Administrator Dawson requested Item 8B, An Update on the NPDES
Phase II Project, be added to this evening's Agenda.
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 4/0.
Councilmember Lizee arrived at 7:02 P.M.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Work Session Minutes, February 24, 2003
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council WOI'k Session Meeting Minutes
of February 24, 2003, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
B.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, February 24, 2003
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
February 24, 2003, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and
Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Authorizing Expenditure of Funds for SeaIcoat Rock
C.
Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 03-017. "A Resolution Denying a Setback Variance
for David LaRose, 5965 Chaska Road."
#;L Ii
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 2 of 7
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Mayor Love explained matters from the floor was a time for residents to be heard on items not placed on
this evening's Agenda, and noted the direction from Council on such matters would be to have Staff
provide further consideration of the issue and report back to Council on the matter of concern at a later
date. He also requested audience participants wishing to address Council limit their comments to
approximately five minutes apiece and avoid duplication of comment.
t
.
Paul Gagner, 25650 Smith town Road, stated he lived west of the LRT trail and had conducted a
neighborhood survey based on the article written in the February 5,2003, Sun Sailor newspaper regarding
the proposed trail project for Smithtown Road. He stated the survey had been conducted in door-to-door
fashion, and he was present this evening to share the results of that survey, and state five points of
concern with the project for further Council review. He then read the survey results and commentary into
the record for the meeting. Highlights of the survey shared included statistics that 83% of residential
property owners in the path of the trail were opposed to it, and 78% of a city-wide scientific random
sample were opposed to utilizing coercion on behalf of the trails. He requested the methodology involved .
in any City research for the project be available for review. He also expressed concern for the process
followed in the proposal of the trail, the rationale for its placement on the north side of the road, as well as
concern for the trail crossing residential driveways, streets, and other potential crossing areas where
motorized vehicles and pedestrians may meet.
Attorney Keane arrived at 7:08 P.M.
Nancy Williams, 26270 Smithtown Road, stated she had moved to her property in Shorewood specifically
because it did not have a sidewalk as she had experienced personal liability problems in the City of
Minneapolis with sidewalks. She stated she found it difficult to believe there would be no liability
assumed by the property owners for a trail crossing their property. She also stated she was not in favor of
people receiving special treatment for the trail to cross properties in this project. In conversations with
other residents in the pathway of the trail, she had learned the City was working with property owners to
make the trail compatible with what existed on properties on an individual basis, and she thought this
should be the case for all property owners. She stated she was not in favor of the trail.
Lauralee Chellen, 26710 Smithtown Road, stated the City of Shorewood provided a unique living
experience for its residents through its beauty and charm. Smith town Road reflected those characteristics
and helped to defme the neighborhood that could not be found in other neighboring suburbs, and she had
moved to Shorewood for that reason. She stated trails were available in other parts of the City; that to add
a trail on Smith town Road would be redundant, and they would change the neighborhood character by
adding increased vehicular traffic, speed, and additional pedestrian traffic. She also stated she thought the
addition of a trail would increase the risks for injury and accidents along the roadway. Additionally, she
noted problems existed with mailbox vandalism, and this trail would only encourage more of that
vandalism. She stated the community was unique, and she requested Council preserve that uniqueness by
not moving forward with the trail project.
Pat Olsen, 25775 Smithtown Road, stated she lived on the south side of roadway, and had had problems
with additional water on her property since previous work on the roadway had taken place. She stated she
was concerned for additional water entering her yard as part of this project as well. She went on to state
her property also backed up to the Southwest LRT trail, and she related her experience with dogs being
off-leash on that trail. She stated she was opposed to the trail's placement as she thought it would become
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
'.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 3 of 7
problematic for residents along the north side of Smithtown Road. Additionally, she did not understand
the rationale for the trail, as it seemed to start and end without connections to other major features.
Eric Chellen, 26710 Smithtown Road, stated he had received phone calls to his home from representatives
of the City working on the trail project indicating the trail project and his dissatisfaction with the
messages they conveyed. He also stated a second phone call had been received requesting he come to
City Hall to examine plans for the trail project. He stated he felt threatened by these phone calls, and he
questioned the need for them. He requested the Council listen to the residents opposed to the project in
this case.
Diana Eckerberg, 27260 Smithtown Road, stated she was in favor of the trail, as she had two small
children that would potentially need to walk to the elementary school. She stated she would prefer the
south side of the roadway be utilized for the trail, as there seemed to be fewer driveways and crossings on
that side. She further stated she was concerned for the crossing areas where pedestrians and motorized
vehicles could meet, and she thought the trail did provide connections, as it would bring kids safely home
from school. She also stated her husband was concerned for the roadway width, combined with the
grassy areas, and then the location of the trail, as it seemed to encroach on neighboring properties located
close to the roadway. She went on to state she concurred with the people concerned for loss of privacy
where trees had been planted and would now need to be removed as part of the project. Ms. Eckerberg
also stated if the roadway were widened, she believed it would be less safe for children to cross
Smith town Road.
Sig Weisser, 27680 Smithtown Road, stated he had been a Shorewood resident for thirty years, and had
had problems with water near his home since the last roadway project. He also questioned which Council
members had approved this project, and whether they lived along Smithtown Road to deal with the
impacts from this project.
Paul Gagner, questioned the proposed trail width.
Mayor Love stated thanked residents for comments heard this evening. He went on to state two main
issues appeared to be of concern. The first included a question of how the process for the project had
taken place, and secondly, he believed a review of what the impact from the trail would be on local
residents would be helpful.
Engineer Brown stated the process followed regarding this roadway project had happened in an identical
fashion to other roadway projects. Of the affected property owners for the roadway, fourteen owners
would need to grant easements for the project to take place from the Hennepin County LRT trail to
Victoria municipal border. Staff had sought addresses and phone numbers from the phone book and
utility records, and attempted to contact residents affected by the project to set up appointments to come
to City Hall to view the proposed plans designed by the City's design consultant, WSB & Associates. He
went on to explain WSB had initially provided incorrect roadway designs, further contributing to the
confusion surrounding the project. Staffhad directed WSB to redesign the project appropriately to reflect
the construction of the trail taking place on the north side of the road with eleven-foot traffic lanes, two
feet of shoulder on the north side of the traffic lanes, and at least five feet of turf, with a five-foot
walkway on the north side of the turf. This area was planned to accommodate mailboxes, and signage.
Engineer Brown also stated it was difficult to structure the walkway around trees, and the City was
attempting to negotiate with residents to determine resolutions for areas that concerned property owners
most in the how the project affected their property. He went on to explain meetings were scheduled to
further define the construction limits in the field so that residents would be able to more accurately
understand where the project would be constructed. Thus far, resident input had indicated further
.,.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 4 of 7 J
markings were needed by the surveyor to clearly convey the construction limits. Engineer Brown also .
noted contact had been made with most property owners affected by the project; however, approximately
five residents remained unavailable to set up appointments for review of the proposed plans. He stated
the bulk of the meetings had already taken place with residents, and he would be most willing to talk
about what could happen in the field regarding the placement of the survey stakes.
Councilmember Garfunkel requested clarification for residents regarding the nonconformities found in
the width of the current roadway, and how that would impact the project. Engineer Brown explained
Smithtown Road currently varied in width from 20 feet to 36 feet. The impact of this variation meant that
in the areas where the roadway was 20 feet wide, it would be widened; and where the roadway was 36
feet wide, it would be narrowed, so that the end result produced a uniform roadway width of two driving
lanes measuring 11 feet in width, with a 4-foot shoulder on the south side of the traffic lanes, and a 2-foot
shoulder on the north side of the traffic lanes. An average width for this project was considered to be
approximately 24-26 feet.
Mayor Love requested Staff report back on this matter, and noted Council had held previously held Public
Hearings on this matter. He stated he would like to have contact made with all affected property owners
so that proper diagrams could be shared. He stated a report on this matter would be placed on the next .
Regular City Council Agenda, and he thanked residents for their comments this evening.
5. PARKS
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held February 25, 2003
Engineer Brown reported on matters considered and actions taken at the February 25, 2003, Park
Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). Commissioner Meyer was also present .
for questions. He noted the Park Commission Meeting was held after the Sports Information Meeting
with representatives of the sports organizations, City Staff, and members of Community Rec. Resources
(CRR), a firm providing Park Coordinator services to the City. Engineer Brown noted the meeting
seemed to go well regarding potential changes in scheduling of the City ball fields for the Sports
Organizations, and he complimented CRR on its efforts to prepare materials and present information at
the meeting. He also noted scheduling software had been purchased by the City and ownership of that
software would be maintained by the City as well.
Commissioner Turgeon stated she had attended the Sports Information meeting, noting the meeting was .
well attended, and information presented seemed to be well received by representatives of the sports
organizations.
6. PLANNING
A. Church Road Property
Director Nielsen stated last summer the City had received a request from John Pastuck to purchase the
excess City property at the end of Church Road. The land was originally purchased to construct a cul-d.e-
sac at the end of the previously dead-end street. At that time, the City assumed the cost of the two street
assessments, totaling $27,787.54, that would otherwise have been borne by the residents of Church Road.
The rationale for this decision was that the assessments would eventually be recovered through resale to a
future developer wishing to utilize the property to the east. Also, at that time, Council directed Staff to
obtain an opinion of value for the property and to advise the nearby residents of a possible sale of the
property. The opinion of value had been received, and Mr. Pastuck had also spoken to nearby property
.
it
.
.
.
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 5 of 7
owners regarding their possible interest in the property. A letter had been received noting the lack of
interest in bidding on the property at this time from three property owners in the adjacent properties.
Staff recommended the property be sold to the adjoining landowner for $27,787.54, plus the cost of the
appraisal.
Director Nielsen also noted questions had arisen regarding the potential for keeping the property for
conservation open space purposes. As previously stated, he recommended, the money spent for retention
of this property as open space could be utilized elsewhere in a more productive fashion.
Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, Accepting the Planning Director's recommendation that the City-
owned land at the end of Church Road be sold to the adjoining landowner for $27,787.54, plus the
cost of the appraisal. Motion passed 5/0.
7. GENERAL
Mayor Love requested this item be changed to New Business for future Agenda items. Council agreed.
Councilmember Zerby requested clarification on the inclusion of annual sealcoat funding in the Capital
Improvement Plan, and suggested the City's identification signage located at municipal borders be
updated. Director Nielsen stated revised signage was being considered part of the proposed streetscape
plans for the City entrances.
8. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
A. Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Freeman Park Parking Lot
Engineer Brown reported that in June of 2002, the City of Shorewood entered into a cooperative
agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to close the Freeman Park access
closure to State Trunk Highway 7. In consideration of this closure, MnDOT was providing the City with
approximately $75,600 as compensation. Plans were approved and bids opened in July, 2002, and due to
the inflated pricing, bids were rejected with the plan to rebid the project in the spring season of 2003.
Engineer Brown went on to report that with ongoing fears of fuel shortages and oil pricing, it was
probable that the pricing during this bidding process would resemble the pricing from last year. At the
last bidding, the low bid was in the amount of approximately $257,000.
Councilmember Turgeon noted that when the original discussions on this project began, it was anticipated
that the compensation from MNDOT would cover the majority of the cost of the project. She questioned
whether any items in the cooperative agreement stated the parking lot had to be paved as part of this
closure project, as she was having difficulty spending approximately $200,000 for paving a parking lot.
She questioned whether the south parking lot affected by the closure could benefit from parking
designation markers, such as posts, chains, and signs, as had taken place at the north parking lot in
Freeman Park.
Engineer Brown stated the cooperative agreement was for the access closure only, so other options
remained available for handling the parking situation in that lot.
Councilmember Garfunkel stated he agreed with Councilmember Turgeon, but also questioned how the
nearby residents would be impacted by the change from asphalt to aggregate in the parking area, as he
could foresee dust posing a problem to residents in the area.
...
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 6 of 7
Mayor Love stated he also supported Councilmember Turgeon's sentiments regarding the expense of the
asphalt parking area. He noted complaints had been received about that parking area, and thought a lot
with designated parking areas would prove more orderly. He stated he was also concerned with the
potential dust problem in that area.
.
Engineer Brown stated measures could be taken to help control the dust, and when utilized in the past,
residents had been happy with results. He stated another impact to consider was that of drainage from the
parking area. In response to Mayor Love's question, Engineer Brown went on to explain the grading of
the lot had been tipped to the east, and that effort had helped the drainage. From a teclmical standpoint,
he stated he was not completely certain the drainage in that area was the fault of the grade of the parking
area, however, the grading could be performed to the same elevations as a paved parking area to alleviate
any remaining concerns.
Engineer Brown recommended this item be tabled to work out further details regarding this closure and
subsequent parking issues.
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, tabling this item until Engineer Brown reported back on the
matter. Motion passed 5/0.
.
B. Update on NPDES Phase II Project
Engineer Brown reported an extension had been requested for City as part of its implementation of the
second phase of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Project. Engineer Brown
complimented WSB and Associates for simplifying the process utilized in this project, and noted the
League of Minnesota Cities had been working with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency with regard to
questions unanswered about this project.
.
9. REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. County Road 19 Intersection
Engineer Brown stated a meeting had taken place between the City and WSB & Associates, the City's .
design consultant on the project, to discuss submission of a revised work program for the project. He
stated he had not heard a report from the County as to the status of negotiations regarding properties in
Tonka Bay affected by the project.
Councilmembers Garfunkel and Turgeon noted, while the direction from the City would not change,
updated progress reports had been promised by the County representatives with regard to the impacted
Work Plan for the project.
2. Public Safety Facilities
Director Nielsen stated the bid opening for the project has gone smoothly last week, and based on bids
received, estimates appeared to be in line with projections from Kraus-Anderson, the firm managing the
project.
3. Smithtown Road
Engineer Brown stated there was nothing further to report on this matter at this time.
.
~.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
March 10, 2003
Page 7 of 7
.
4.
Metropolitan Council Comments Regarding Comprehensive Plan
Director Nielsen shared comments received from representatives of Metropolitan Council regarding the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
B. Mayor & City Council
Councilmember Turgeon requested the Council hold a work session meeting to discuss potential
budgetary impacts from the anticipated loss of funding from the State. Council agreed, noting this
discussion should be placed on a Regular City COtmcil Meeting Agenda.
10. ADJOURN
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of March 10,2003, at
8:33 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
. Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
.
.
'.,
"
Neighborhood Comments
City Council Meeting
March 10,2003
.
We want to read these comments into the official minutes ofthis meeting.
Survey Results:
83% in the path of the trail are opposed to it. 7% are undecided. Onlv 10010 favor it. When you include their neighbors across the road
69% are still opposed. 75% of the survey is opposed to any coercion of their neighbors for trails, with 8% undecided and only 17%
endorsing coercion. 78% of a city wide scientific random sample are opposed to coercion on behalf of trails.
This research is available for your examination. Just call Paul Gagner at 470-9592. We would li.ke to examine the methodology
involved in any city research.
(1) As you can see from our door-to-door results, the vast majority of those in the physical path of the trail oppose it, along with a
clear majority of the neighbors nearby. A clear majority also reject coercion on behalf of the trail. If all neighbors count, then they
should count when they overwhelmingly reject coercion as the method by which a trail is built.
(2) When the Smithtown Trail was first proposed during the Bean administration, it was slated for the south side. That was the
original engineerin2 decision. When the Smithtown Committee opposed that trail it was switched to the north side where most of the
resistance was coming from __ as it is now. We need to make it clear that we will not tolerate the violation of anyone's civil rights due
to animus. The basis of the decision for putting the trail on the north instead of the south side is important, and must be demonstrably .
objective, not because we would ever force the trail on our neighbors to the south, but to insure that the basis of any decision the city
makes i.v clear al1d 11011-arbitrary. Obviollsly, a trail 011 the 110rth side forces childrel1 going to school to cross SmithtowlI Road to the,
north willy nilly. There may be no clear advantage to one side or the other in this regard. The goal is to make sure that the
engineering rationale is clear and public. We ex.pect detailed documentation from the city in this regard. Then we can sit down with
the DOT, our civil engineering consultant, our lawyers and our state representatives to examine whether the trail project is well-
conceived by nature. One question we are pursuing is what the state would expect from such a decision and the process as a whole.
(3) Just to state the obvious: The city of Shore wood should not be fudging on MSA requirements for an MSA funded trail. We'\1 .
confirm this with the DOT. The city should not be cutting deals for one property owner and not another. There should be no
discrimination in the city's approach to this trail. We should all be treated the same. If we believe the city is violating anyone's ci.vil
rights, through relative favor, privelege, or disfavor, we will pursue that aggressively. lfthe only way the city can get the residents to
accept the trail is by violating DOT standards, or manipulating the residents in discriminatory ways, it is a clear sign that the trail is
simply not viable. The neighbors recognize that we're all equal in this together, even if the city does' not recognize that.
(4) The city has presented no risk analysis, which proves t11at the trail, or even just the widening of the road, will not become an
attractive nuisance and cause the first pedestrian-car tragedy on the Shorewood side of Smithtown. Presently there is no objective
statistical evidence of a major hazard. And everyone can agree that subjective estimates of safety are simply arbitrary and .
authoritarian. Any road, given enough time will be the scene of an accident due to driver and pedestrian error. But a trail slated to
cross multiple driveways and side streets is at least an obvious, objective, attractive nuisance. We intend to make sure that
documentation of Shore wood's lack of analysis in this regard is on record and made public. The State ofMN may not require the city
to produce this documentation, but the first one to be injured by the new configuration, will want to know whether or not this analysis
was done.
(5) As far as we know this council committed itself early on to not forcing trails on people who don't want them. We don't want it.
And the vast majority of Shorewoodians are opposed to coercing us. As far as we're concerned the case is closed.
r-?6 €?.
0:. ~~
3.../o~o3
.
-
PAYABLES APPROVALS
For 3/24/03 Council Meeting
.
!J. J 'l-IJI) JI ;J 4
Prepared by: _Larll)JL</n-t, ( # L (if,,/2.{, Date: ---3-do-ffi
Catherine EIke, Sr. Accountant
Reviewed by: ~~ Date: ~/Q3
Bonnie Burton, Fi ce Director
Date: 03.'21;,03
Approved by:
Crai
.
#jlJ
Check Approval List for 03/24/03 Sorted by Department
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34810 ADVANCED IMAGING SO MARCH CONTRACT SVC 3/13/2003 10621 $160.50
34811 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 MAR 03 UNION DUES 3/13/2003 $193.90
34813 CHAMPION AUTO STOR FUEL PUMP 3/13/2003 D.181520 $178.90
34813 CHAMPION AUTO STOR U-JOINTS 3/13/2003 D-182053 $39.37
34814 G & K SERVICES 3/13/2003 022803 ST $489.82
34817 ICMA RETIREMENT TRU PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 302131-03 $1,374.57
34818 KINKO'S PLAN COPIES-MN MINI S 3/13/2003 06210003 $12.01
34820 MN CHILD SUPPORT PM CHILD SUPPORT - C SCH 3/13/2003 $173.51
34821 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV MARCH IMPOUNDS/BOA 3/13/2003 $213.00
34822 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 2/24 - 3/7/03 3/13/2003 $95.04
34823 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 $2,164.78
34823 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 $2,347.32
34825 WASTE MANAGEMENT 3/13/2003 0512489-1 $232.63
34826 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO L. TURGEON REG FEE 3/19/2003 $40.00
34826 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO NIELSEN,BAILEY,WOODR 3/19/2003 $110.00
34827 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 3/11 & 3/18 MTGS 3/20/2003 $150.00
34827 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 3/11 & 3/18 MTGS 3/20/2003 $150.00 .
34828 CULLIGAN BOTTLED W A 3/20/2003 114X1987 $24.97
34830 FASCHING, PATRICIA 1 ST QTR 2003 MILEAGE 3/20/2003 $2.52
34830 FASCHING, PATRICIA 1 ST QTR 2003 MILEAGE 3/20/2003 $17.28
34832 HENN CTY TREASURER PID BOOKS 3/20/2003 $102.19
34833 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRE DATA EXTRACTION LABO 3/20/2003 361 $54.00
34834 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES ROAD SIGNS 3/20/2003 0116302 $592.66
34835 LOE'S OIL CO. OIL FILTER DISPOSAL 3/20/2003 29884 $30.00
34839 ORONO, CITY OF MAR ANIMAL CONTROL 3/20/2003 2519 $1,579.08
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $162.09
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $116.64
34847 WM. MUELLER & SONS, I 3/20/2003 75336 $1,851.77
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0114-707- $137.50
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0208-203- $7.40
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0326-600- $17.17
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1541-203- $153.23
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2052-902- $13.53 .
34849 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3/20/2003 54201998 $74.87
34850 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 APRIL 2003 DENTAL 3/25/2003 $270.20
34853 BERRY COFFEE CO 3/25/2003 337613 $30.50
34853 BERRY COFFEE CO 3/25/2003 337614 $22.00
34858 GALLES CORP PARK SUPPLIES/SHOP S 3/25/2003 102994 $311.75
34858 GALLES CORP PARK SUPPLIES/SHOP S 3/25/2003 102994 $219.66
34863 HEALTHPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $482.80
34864 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRE HAZARDOUS WASTE BIL 3/25/2003 035574 $222.75
34868 JRK, INC GRASS SEED 3/25/2003 18389 $947.85
34869 KAR PRODUCTS WIRE BRUSH 3/25/2003 90004503 $53.13
34869 KAR PRODUCTS 3/25/2003 90004571 ($40.35)
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL GENERAL MATTERS 3/25/2003 428618 $1,764.04
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL LAND USE-CARMICHAEU 3/25/2003 428619 $272.00
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL SMITHTOWN RD STITRAI 3/25/2003 428620 $112.50
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL R.JOHNSON ET AL V. CIT 3/25/2003 428621 $262.50
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL SHOREWOOD YACHT CL 3/25/2003 428622 $90.00
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL CUB FOODS 3/25/2003 428625 $420.00
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL CTY RD 19 PROJECT 3/25/2003 428626 $625.00
34871 WRINC OPT-OUT STUDY-FEB BIL 3/25/2003 SHORE03 $6,975.00
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34872 MAMA MEMBERSHIP DUES 3/25/2003 511 $50.00
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $8,095.86
34875 MEDTOX LABORATORIE DRUG SCREENING 3/25/2003 02200379 $47.50
34877 MORTON SALT BULK SALT FOR ROADW 3/25/2003 600165 $3,173.90
34878 MOUND-CITY OF 2ND OTR FIRE SVCS 3/25/2003 921-2 $2,511.50
34880 NORTHERN TOOL & EO SHOP SUPPLIES 3/25/2003 07792094 $61.73
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19551779 $190.74
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19568655 $168.96
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19628854 $111.31
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19628854 $12.65
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19685820 ($190.74)
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19733192 $140.69
34885 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT PSTG METER MAINT CON 3/25/2003 5440954- $328.02
34887 SO LK MTKA POLICE DE SPEC DETAIL.SMITHTOW 3/25/2003 $275.49
34887 SO LK MTKA POLICE DE APRIL MONTHLY BUDGE 3/25/2003 $51,977.00
34887 SO LK MTKA POLICE DE APR LEASE PMT-PUBLlC 3/25/2003 $25,342.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES CUB FOODS WATERMAIN 3/25/2003 01074-741 $1,360.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES CUB FOODS WATERMAIN 3/25/2003 01074-762 $1,005.00
34893 XCELENERGY 3/25/2003 0615-308- $3.14
. 34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1605-305- $86.50
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1724-866- $68.79
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1732-704- $2,385.26
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 2001-503- $20.88
TOTAl- FOR 101 GENERAL FUND $123,330.26
34890 US BANK GO IMPR BOND DTD 12/1/ 3/25/2003 1220712 $218.38
TOTALFOR 302 1993 IMPROVEMENTS $218.38
34844 TECHIES JAN MAINTENANCE 3/20/2003 67412 $500.00
34888 TECHIES APR CONTRACT SVC 3/25/2003 $500.00
TOTAL FOR 401 PUBLIC FACILITIES/OFFICE EQUIPMENT $1,000.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES FREEMAN PK DRIVEWAY 3/25/2003 01074-483 $303.00
TOTAL FOR 402 PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $303.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES FREEMAN PK DRIVEWAY 3/25/2003 01074-483 $788.75
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES MALLARD/TEAUBRAND R 3/25/2003 01074-732 $5,684.00
. 34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES LK LINDEN DR PED TRAIL 3/25/2003 01459-002 $56.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES LK LINDEN DR PED TRAIL 3/25/2003 01459-013 $180.00
TOTAL FOR 404 STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $6,709.25
34861 HARDRIVES, INC PV#9 - HWY 7 & 41 3/25/2003 $125,014.47
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL TH 7/41 ROW CONDEMN 3/25/2003 428623 $454.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES SMITHTOWN RD OVERLA 3/25/2003 01074-583 $6,849.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES SMITHTOWN RD OVERLA 3/25/2003 01074-583 $6,192.50
TOTAL FOR 405 MSA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $138,510.97
34816 HOME SECURITY STOR AUTO DIALER FOR WELL 3/13/2003 0040230 $744.00
34831 GOPHER STATE ONE-CA FEB SVC 3/20/2003 3020694 $11.62
34838 MINNETONKA-CITY OF 5350 VINE HILL RD WATE 3/20/2003 $53.69
34838 MINNETONKA-CITY OF 5366 VINE HILL RD WATE 3/20/2003 $26.65
34842 OWEST 3/20/2003 $261.99
34842 OWEST 3/20/2003 $99.05
34848 XCELENERGY 3/20/2003 0234-748- $7.40
34848 XCELENERGY 3/20/2003 1351-508- $528.75
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1692-607- $459.05
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1776-835- $45.31
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2095-300- $1,596.10
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2270-109- $411.13
34862 HAWKINS WATER TREA 3/25/2003 DM86263 $80.00
34866 JOHN HENRY FOSTER M AIR COMPRESSOR PART 3/25/2003 1254851-0 $9.00
34879 NATIONAL WATERWOR SEALS 3/25/2003 9172025 $59.55
34879 NATIONAL WATERWOR 3/25/2003 9185464 $0.76
34886 SEELYE PLASTICS INC WATER SUPPLIES 3/25/2003 644911 $8.59
34890 US BANK GEN OBL WA REV BOND 3/25/2003 1220985 $318.38
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 0145-009- $15.22
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1440-708- $306.93
TOTAL FOR 601 WATER UTILITY $5,043.17
34831 GOPHER STATE ONE-CA FEB SVC 3/20/2003 3020694 $11.63
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0074-000- $8.07
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0191-308- $31.02
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0640-202- $14.44
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0675-505- $18.16
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0942-567- $38.14
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1350-001- $26.87
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1641-408- $53.09 .
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2325-902- $25.79
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2397-003- $12.99
34865 HOME SECURITY STOR CELLULAR VOICE DIALE 3/25/2003 0043157-1 $1,377.00
34876 METRO COUNCIL ENVIR APRIL WASTEWATER 3/25/2003 752624 $38,779.00
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 0408-607- $57.70
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1285-101- $14.88
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1373-808- $7.96
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1564-303- $8.21
TOTAL FOR 611 SANITARY SEWER UTILITY $40,484.95
34856 E-Z RECYCLING INC. MARCH SVC 3/25/2003 4864 $6,255.00
TOTAL FOR 621 RECYCLING UTILITY $6,255.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES WATER RESOURCE MGM 3/25/2003 01074-080 $324.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES HARDING LN STORMWAT 3/25/2003 01074-721 $400.00
TOTAL FOR 631 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY $724.00
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401007 $109.52 .
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401007 $395.98
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234061-00 $880.36
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234183-00 $720.71
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234183-00 $997.92
34825 WASTE MANAGEMENT 3/13/2003 0512488-1 $110.57
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364414 $1,708.55
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12025/57 $52.65
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12025/57 $52.65
34837 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/20/2003 63293190 $93.20
34837 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/20/2003 63293208 ($36.66)
34840 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 3/20/2003 44995290 $86.24
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236474-00 $1,499.19
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236474-00 $61.89
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236526-00 $182.06
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $35.37
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $18.65
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 222724 ($2.00)
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3120/2003 289159A $1.50
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 289160 $243.90
""""""
March 20,jiJiij Page 3 of6
Check# Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 289160 $13.15
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36755800 $16.40
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36782100 $9.83
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25810200 $296.00
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25810200 $970.48
34852 BELLBOY CORPORA TIO 3/25/2003 25826100 ($7.67)
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25868300 $689.00
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25917800 $971.85
34854 CR COMMUNICATIONS PHONE REPAIRS 3/25/2003 SL021405 $77.50
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210001 $328.25
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210923 $376.85
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 211776 $72.40
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367182 $543.15
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367182 $12.10
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369985 $877.15
34859 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN 3/25/2003 53333 $285.00
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 608998 ($26.63)
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678660 $230.48
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678928 $1,237.93
. 34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 680077 $23.85
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 680109 $474.60
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682239 $21.70
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682520 $1,563.77
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685565 $1,218.87
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685844 $550.87
34863 HEALTHPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $52.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527024 $2,448.26
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527024 $1,314.15
34867 JOHNSON BROS LIOUO 3/25/2003 1529825 $716.65
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529825 $1,236.59
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529826 $26.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532585 $133.04
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532585 $880.60
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512382 $782.65
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512383 $89.60
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 514658 $759.30
. 34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516887 $622.30
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516888 $22.40
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $505.49
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19681975 $60.98
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 3/25/2003 8001206 $258.00
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001783 $523.00
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925409 $904.80
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927101 $6.76
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927101 $102.09
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927530 $714.29
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929548 $1,257.90
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289839 $13.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289839 $499.85
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289840 $295.80
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290396 $782.70
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291070 $30.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291070 $1,693.05
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 17132 ($8.29)
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 17133 ($20.66)
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 70316 $454.75
Check# Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR 641 SHOREWOOD PLAZA UQUOR $35,196.48
34812 ARCTIC GLACIER INC 3/13/2003 DC306201 $16.80
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401005 $363.02
34819 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/13/2003 63288315 $102.15
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234059-00 $516.33
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234166-00 $1,132.69
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234166-00 $1,503.29
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364413 $20.80
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364413 $1,287.25
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12024/56 $31.05
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12024/56 $31.05
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $128.65
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $448.07
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $24.95
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236525-00 $197.95
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $18.64
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $35.37
34846 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 133627 $16.80
34846 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 133627 $102.35 .
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36755700 $16.40
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25810000 $1,375.08
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25810000 $296.00
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25868200 $1,001.45
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25917700 $1,212.10
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210000 $560.15
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210921 $431.10
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 211775 $918.70
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 366511 $72.00
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367179 $1,160.75
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367179 $10.40
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369981 $1,450.35
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369981 $10.40
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678663 $312.42
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678930 $1,311.35
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682240 $128.06
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682522 $886.37 .
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685568 $1,153.23
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685568 $29.50
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685845 $30.95
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685846 $372.78
34863 HEAL THPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $52.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 3/25/2003 1527023 $814.20
34867 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 3/25/2003 1527023 $1,340.89
34867 JOHNSON BROS L1QUO 3/25/2003 1529824 $691.43
34867 JOHNSON BROS UQUO 3/25/2003 1529824 $34.20
34867 JOHNSON BROS LIQUO 3/25/2003 1529824 $943.67
34867 JOHNSON BROS UQUO 3/25/2003 1532583 $751.64
34867 JOHNSON BROS LIQUO 3/25/2003 1532583 $1,061.82
34867 JOHNSON BROS UQUO 3/25/2003 1532584 $26.00
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512389 $1,596.10
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 514652 $712.15
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516880 $875.45
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516881 $22.40
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $558.71
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 0211062 $88.75
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001205 $232.00
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001782 $252.00
34883 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 3/25/2003 42173753 $17.06
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925407 $798.25
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925407 $132.70
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927100 $102.09
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927100 $116.68
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927529 $366.54
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929547 $837.85
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929547 $114.00
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289499 $108.50
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289841 $2,641.20
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289879 $400.00
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290395 $1,428.05
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290395 $13.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291069 $39.45
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291069 $1,927.00
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 70314 $636.65
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 0677-702- $421.14
. TOTAL FOR 642 WATERFORD UQUOR $38,870.47
34809 TONKA BAY-CITY OF 2002 % of GROSS SALES 3/7/2003 $9,995.94
TOTAL FOR 643 TONKA BAY LIQUOR $9,995.94
TOTAL CHECKS $406,641.87
.
Check Approval List for 03/24/03 Council Meeting
Check# Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34809 TONKA BAY-CITY OF 2002 % of GROSS SALES 317/2003 $9,995.94
TOTALFOR TONKA BAY-CITY OF $9,995.94
34810 ADVANCED IMAGING SO MARCH CONTRACT SVC 3/13/2003 10621 $160.50
TOTAL FOR ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC $160.50
34811 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 MAR 03 UNION DUES 3/13/2003 $193.90
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14 $193.90
34812 ARCTIC GLACIER INC 3/13/2003 DC306201 $16.80
TOTAL FOR ARCTIC GLACIER INC $16.80
34813 CHAMPION AUTO STOR FUEL PUMP 3/13/2003 D-181520 $178.90
34813 CHAMPION AUTO STOR U-JOINTS 3/13/2003 D-182053 $39.37
TOTAL FOR CHAMPION AUTO STORE #344 $218.27
34814 G & K SERVICES 3/13/2003 022803 ST $489.82
TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES $489.82
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401005 $363.02
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401007 $109.52 .
34815 HERMEL WHOLESALE 3/13/2003 401007 $395.98
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $868.52
34816 HOME SECURITY STOR AUTO DIALER FOR WELL 3/13/2003 0040230 $744.00
TOTAL FOR HOME SECURITY STORE INC $744.00
34817 ICMA RETIREMENT TRU PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 302131-03 $1,374.57
TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $1,374.57
34818 KINKO'S PLAN COPIES-MN MINI S 3/13/2003 06210003 $12.01
TOTAL FOR KINKO'S $12.01
34819 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/13/2003 63288315 $102.15
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $102.15
34820 MN CHILD SUPPORT PM CHILD SUPPORT - C SCH 3/13/2003 $173.51
TOTAL FOR MN CHIW SUPPORT PMT CTR $173.51
34821 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV MARCHIMPOUND~BOA 3/13/2003 $213.00
TOTAL FOR PA WS, CLA WS & HOOVES PET $213.00 .
34822 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 2/24 - 317/03 3/13/2003 $95.04
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $95.04
34823 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 $2,347.32
34823 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 3 3/13/2003 $2,164.78
TOTALFOR PERA $4,512.10
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234059-00 $516.33
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234061-00 $880.36
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234166-00 $1,132.69
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234166-00 $1,503.29
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234183-00 $997.92
34824 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/13/2003 234183-00 $720.71
TOTAlJ FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $5,751.30
34825 WASTE MANAGEMENT 3/13/2003 0512488-1 $110.57
34825 WASTE MANAGEMENT 3/13/2003 0512489-1 $232.63
TOTAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT $343.20
34826 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO L. TURGEON REG FEE 3/19/2003 $40.00
34826 SENSIBLE LAND USE CO NIELSEN,BAILEY,WOODR 3/19/2003 $110.00
TOTAL FOR SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITN $150.00
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34827 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 3/11 & 3/18 MTGS 3/20/2003 $150.00
34827 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 3/11 & 3/18 MTGS 3/20/2003 $150.00
TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B. $300.00
34828 CULLIGAN BOTTLED W A 3/20/2003 114X1987 $24.97
TOTAL FOR CULUGAN BOTTLED WATER $24.97
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364413 $1,287.25
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364413 $20.80
34829 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 364414 $1,708.55
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $3,016.60
34830 FASCHING, PATRICIA 1 ST QTR 2003 MILEAGE 3/20/2003 $2.52
34830 FASCHING, PATRICIA 1 ST QTR 2003 MILEAGE 3/20/2003 $17.28
TOTAL FOR FASCHING, PATRICIA $19.80
34831 GOPHER STATE ONE-CA FEB SVC 3/20/2003 3020694 $11.62
34831 GOPHER STATE ONE-CA FEB SVC 3/20/2003 3020694 $11.63
TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, IN $23.25
34832 HENN CTY TREASURER PID BOOKS 3/20/2003 $102.19
TOTAL FOR HENNCTYTREASURER $102.19
. 34833 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRE DATA EXTRACTION LABO 3/20/2003 361 $54.00
TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER $54.00
34834 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES ROAD SIGNS 3/20/2003 0116302 $592.66
TOTAL FOR LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC $592.66
34835 LOE'S OIL CO. OIL FILTER DISPOSAL 3/20/2003 29884 $30.00
TOTAL FOR LOE'S OIL CO. $30.00
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12024/56 $31.05
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12024/56 $31.05
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12025/57 $52.65
34836 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 3/20/2003 12025/57 $52.65
TOTAL FOR MARUN'S TRUCKING $167.40
34837 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/20/2003 63293190 $93.20
34837 MIDWEST COCA-COLA B 3/20/2003 63293208 ($36.66)
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $56.54
34838 MINNETONKA-CITY OF 5366 VINE HILL RD WATE 3/20/2003 $26.65
. 34838 MINNETONKA-CITY OF 5350 VINE HILL RD WATE 3/20/2003 $53.69
TOTAL FOR MINNETONKA-CITY OF $80.34
34839 ORONO, CITY OF MAR ANIMAL CONTROL 3/20/2003 2519 $1,579.08
TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF $1,579.08
34840 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 3/20/2003 44995290 $86.24
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY $86.24
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $24.95
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $128.65
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236473-00 $448.07
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236474-00 $61.89
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236474-00 $1,499.19
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236525-00 $197.95
34841 QUALITY WINE & SPIRIT 3/20/2003 236526-00 $182.06
TOTAL FOR QUAUTY WINE & SPIRITS CO $2,542.76
34842 QWEST 3/20/2003 $99.05
34842 QWEST 3/20/2003 $261.99
TOTAL FOR QWEST $361.04
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $18.64
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $18.65
Check# Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $35.37
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $35.37
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $116.64
34843 SAM'S CLUB 3/20/2003 030303 $162.09
TOTAL FOR SAM'S CLUB $386.76
34844 TECHIES JAN MAINTENANCE 3/20/2003 67412 $500.00
TOTALFOR TECHIES $500.00
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 222724 ($2.00)
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 289159A $1.50
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 289160 $13.15
34845 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/20/2003 289160 $243.90
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $256.55
34846 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE 3120/2003 133627 $16.80
34846 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE 3/20/2003 133627 $102.35
TOTAL FOR TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY $119.15
34847 WM. MUELLER & SONS, I 3/20/2003 75336 $1,851.n
TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. $1,851.77
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0074-000- $8.07
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0114-707- $137.50 .
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0191-308- $31.02
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0208-203- $7.40
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0234-748- $7.40
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0326-600- $17.17
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0640-202- $14.44
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0675-505- $18.16
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 0942-567- $38.14
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1350-001- $26.87
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1351-508- $528.75
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1541-203- $153.23
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1641-408- $53.09
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1692-607- $459.05
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 1776-835- $45.31
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2052.902- $13.53
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2095-300- $1,596.10
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2270-109- $411.13 .
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2325-902- $25.79
34848 XCEL ENERGY 3/20/2003 2397-003- $12.99
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY $3,605.14
34849 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3/20/2003 54201998 $74.87
TOTAL FOR ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE $74.87
34850 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 APRIL 2003 DENTAL 3/25/2003 $270.20
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14 $270.20
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36755700 $16.40
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36755800 $16.40
34851 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 3/25/2003 36782100 $9.83
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $42.63
34852 BELLBOY CORPORA TIO 3/25/2003 25810000 $1.375.08
34852 BELLBOY CORPORA TIO 3/25/2003 25810000 $296.00
34852 BELLBOY CORPORA TIO 3/25/2003 25810200 $970.48
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25810200 $296.00
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25826100 ($7.67)
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25868200 $1,001.45
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25868300 $689.00
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25917700 $1,212.10
34852 BELLBOY CORPORATIO 3/25/2003 25917800 $971 .85
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $6,804.29
34853 BERRY COFFEE CO 3/25/2003 337613 $30.50
34853 BERRY COFFEE CO 3/25/2003 337614 $22.00
TOTAL FOR BERRY COFFEE CO $52.50
34854 CR COMMUNICATIONS PHONE REPAIRS 3/25/2003 SL021405 $77.50
TOTAL FOR CR COMMUNICATIONS $77.50
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210000 $560.15
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210001 $328.25
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210921 $431.10
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 210923 $376.85
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 211775 $918.70
34855 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 211776 $72.40
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $2,687.45
34856 E-Z RECYCLING INC. MARCH SVC 3/25/2003 4864 $6,255.00
TOTAL FOR E-Z RECYCLING INC. $6,255.00
. 34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 366511 $72.00
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367179 $10.40
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367179 $1,160.75
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367182 $12.10
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 367182 $543.15
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369981 $10.40
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369981 $1,450.35
34857 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3/25/2003 369985 $877.15
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $4,136.30
34858 GALLES CORP PARK SUPPLIES/SHOP S 3/25/2003 102994 $219.66
34858 GALLES CORP PARK SUPPLIES/SHOP S 3/25/2003 102994 $311.75
TOTAL FOR GALLES CORP $531.41
34859 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, IN 3/25/2003 53333 $285.00
TOTAL FOR GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC $285.00
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 608998 ($26.63)
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678660 $230.48
. 34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678663 $312.42
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678928 $1,237.93
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 678930 $1,311.35
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 680077 $23.85
34860 GRIGGS. COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 680109 $474.60
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682239 $21.70
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682240 $128.06
34860 GRIGGS. COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682520 $1,563.77
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 682522 $886.37
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685565 $1,218.87
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685568 $29.50
34860 GRIGGS. COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685568 $1,153.23
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685844 $550.87
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685845 $30.95
34860 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO 3/25/2003 685846 $372.78
TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $9,520.10
34861 HARDRIVES, INC PV#9 - HWY 7 & 41 3/25/2003 $125,014.47
TOTAL FOR HARDRIVES,INC $125,014.47
34862 HAWKINS WATER TREA 3/25/2003 DM86263 $80.00
Check# Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $80.00
34863 HEALTHPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $52.00
34863 HEAL THPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $52.00
34863 HEAL THPARTNERS APRIL DENTAL PREM 3/25/2003 18239024 $482.80
TOTAL FOR HEALTHPARTNERS $586.80
34864 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRE HAZARDOUS WASTE BIL 3/25/2003 035574 $222.75
TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER $222.75
34865 HOME SECURITY STOR CELLULAR VOICE DIALE 3/25/2003 0043157-1 $1,377.00
TOTAL FOR HOME SECURITY STORE INC $1,377.00
34866 JOHN HENRY FOSTER M AIR COMPRESSOR PART 3/25/2003 1254851-0 $9.00
TOTAL FOR JOHN HENRY FOSTER MN INC $9.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527023 $814.20
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527023 $1,340.89
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527024 $1,314.15
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1527024 $2,448.26
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529824 $943.67
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529824 $34.20
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529824 $691.43 .
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529825 $716.65
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529825 $1,236.59
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1529826 $26.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532583 $751.64
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532583 $1,061.82
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532584 $26.00
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532585 $133.04
34867 JOHNSON BROS L10UO 3/25/2003 1532585 $880.60
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS liQUOR CO. $12,419.14
34868 JRK, INC GRASS SEED 3/25/2003 18389 $947.85
TOTAL FOR JRK,INC $947.85
34869 KAR PRODUCTS WIRE BRUSH 3/25/2003 90004503 $53.13
34869 KAR PRODUCTS 3/25/2003 90004571 ($40.35)
TOTAL FOR KAR PRODUCTS $12.78
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL GENERAL MATTERS 3/25/2003 428618 $1,764.04
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL LAND USE-CARMICHAEU 3/25/2003 428619 $272.00 .
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL SMITHTOWN RD ST/TRAI 3/25/2003 428620 $112.50
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL R.JOHNSON ET AL V. CIT 3/25/2003 428621 $262.50
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL SHOREWOOD YACHT CL 3/25/2003 428622 $90.00
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL TH 7/41 ROW CONDEMN 3/25/2003 428623 $454.50
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL CUB FOODS 3/25/2003 428625 $420.00
34870 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL CTY RD 19 PROJECT 3/25/2003 428626 $625.00
TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY... $4,000.54
34871 WRINC OPT-OUT STUDY-FEB BIL 3/25/2003 SHORE03 $6,975.00
TOTAL FOR UR INC $6,975.00
34872 MAMA MEMBERSHIP DUES 3/25/2003 511 $50.00
TOTAL FOR MAMA $50.00
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512382 $782.65
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512383 $89.60
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 512389 $1,596.10
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 514652 $712.15
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 514658 $759.30
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516880 $875.45
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516881 $22.40
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516887 $622.30
34873 MARK VII 3/25/2003 516888 $22.40
TOTAL FOR MARK VII $5,482.35
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $505.49
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $558.71
34874 MEDICA APRIL MED PREM 3/25/2003 10309113 $8,095.86
TOTALFOR MEDICA $9,160.06
34875 MEDTOX LABORATORIE DRUG SCREENING 3/25/2003 02200379 $47.50
TOTAL FOR MEDTOX LABORATORIES $47.50
34876 METRO COUNCIL ENVIR APRIL WASTEWATER 3/25/2003 752624 $38,779.00
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $38,779.00
34877 MORTON SALT BULK SALT FOR ROADW 3/25/2003 600165 $3,173.90
TOTAL FOR MORTON SALT $3,173.90
34878 MOUND-CITY OF 2ND OTR FIRE SVCS 3/25/2003 921-2 $2,511.50
TOTAL FOR MOUND-CITY OF $2,511.50
34879 NATIONAL WATERWOR SEALS 3/25/2003 9172025 $59.55
34879 NATIONAL WATERWOR 3/25/2003 9185464 $0.76
. TOTAL FOR NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC $60.31
34880 NORTHERN TOOL & EO SHOP SUPPLIES 3/25/2003 07792094 $61.73
TOTAL FOR NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP CO $61.73
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19551779 $190.74
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19568655 $168.96
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19628854 $111.31
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19628854 $12.65
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19681975 $60.98
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19685820 ($190.74)
34881 OFFICE DEPOT 3/25/2003 19733192 $140.69
TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $494.59
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 3/25/2003 0211062 $88.75
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COMPAN 3/25/2003 8001205 $232.00
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001206 $258.00
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001782 $252.00
34882 PAUSTIS WINE COM PAN 3/25/2003 8001783 $523.00
. TOTAL FOR PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY $1,353.75
34883 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 3/25/2003 42173753 $17.06
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY $17.06
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925407 $798.25
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925407 $132.70
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 925409 $904.80
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927100 $102.09
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927100 $116.68
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927101 $6.76
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927101 $102.09
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927529 $366.54
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 927530 $714.29
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929547 $114.00
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929547 $837.85
34884 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRIT 3/25/2003 929548 $1,257.90
TOTAL FOR PHILUPS WINE & SPIRITS $5,453.95
34885 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT PSTG METER MAINT CON 3/25/2003 5440954- $328.02
TOTAL FOR PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP $328.02
Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
34886 SEELYE PLASTICS INC WATER SUPPLIES 3/25/2003 644911 $8.59
TOTAL FOR SEELYE PLASTICS INC $8.59
34887 SO lK MTKA POLICE DE APRil MONTHLY BUDGE 3/25/2003 $51,977.00
34887 SO lK MTKA POLICE DE SPEC DETAIL-SMITHTOW 3/25/2003 $275.49
34887 SO LK MTKA POLICE DE APR LEASE PMT-PUBLlC 3/25/2003 $25,342.00
TOTAL FOR SO LK MTKA POllCE DEPT $77,594.49
34888 TECHIES APR CONTRACT SVC 3/25/2003 $500.00
TOTAL FOR TECHIES $500.00
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289499 $108.50
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289839 $13.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289839 $499.85
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289840 $295.80
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289841 $2,641.20
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 289879 $400.00
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290395 $13.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290395 $1,428.05
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 290396 $782.70
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3125/2003 291069 $39.45
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291069 $1,927.00 .
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291070 $30.15
34889 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3/25/2003 291070 $1,693.05
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $9,872.05
34890 US BANK GO IMPR BOND DTD 12111 3125/2003 1220712 $218.38
34890 US BANK GEN OBl WA REV BOND 3/25/2003 1220985 $318.38
TOTAL FOR US BANK $536.76
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 17132 ($8.29)
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 17133 ($20.66)
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 70314 $636.65
34891 WINE MERCHANTS 3/25/2003 70316 $454.75
TOTAL FOR WINE MERCHANTS $1,062.45
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES WATER RESOURCE MGM 3/25/2003 01074-080 $324.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES FREEMAN PK DRIVEWAY 3125/2003 01074-483 $303.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES FREEMAN PK DRIVEWAY 3/25/2003 01074-483 $788.75
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES SMITHTOWN RD OVERLA 3125/2003 01074-583 $6,849.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES SMITHTOWN RD OVERLA 3/25/2003 01074-583 $6,192.50 .
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES HARDING IN STORMWAT 3125/2003 01074-721 $400.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES MALLARD/TEAUBRAND R 3/25/2003 01074-732 $5,684.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES CUB FOODS WATERMAIN 3125/2003 01074-741 $1,360.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES CUB FOODS WATERMAIN 3/25/2003 01074-762 $1,005.00
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES lK LINDEN DR PED TRAIL 3/25/2003 01459-002 $56.50
34892 WSB AND ASSOCIATES lK LINDEN DR PED TRAIL 3/25/2003 01459-013 $180.00
TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIATES $23,143.75
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3125/2003 0145-009- $15.22
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 0408-607- $57.70
34893 XCELENERGY 3/25/2003 0615-308- $3.14
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 0677-702- $421.14
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1285-101- $14.88
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3125/2003 1373-808- $7.96
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1440-708- $306.93
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3125/2003 1564-303- $8.21
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1605-305- $86.50
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1724.866- $68.79
34893 XCEL ENERGY 3/25/2003 1732-704- $2,385.26
PAYROLL APPRO V ALS
For 3/24/03 Council Meeting
d '- di11 elk
Prepared by: ,0-:6 e/(/vYLP . . , '
Catheri~e Elke, ~r. A5.count~t
Reviewed by: ~~
Bonnie Burton, Fi e Director
Date: 3---;)0-03
.
Date:~/o?J
.
Approved by: Date: O~.Z().. OS
Crai awson, CIty Administrator
.
~
. Payroll Register
" .
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
2014 BAILEY BOYD C 1,378.22 3/11/2003
2015 BURTON BONNIE M 1,871.21 3/11/2003
2016 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,055.30 3/11/2003
2017 EISCHENS JAMES E 853.26 3/11/2003
2018 ELKE CATHERINE M 881.12 3/11/2003
2019 FASCHING PATRICIA L 804.39 3/11/2003
2020 FIELD DALE F 663.81 3/11/2003
2021 GROUT TWILA R 870.51 3/11/2003
2022 HELLING PAMELA J 665.44 3/11/2003
2023 HIRSCH DANA M 35.00 3/11/2003
2024 JOHNSON DENNIS D 1,302.61 3/11/2003
2025 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,198.32 3/11/2003
2026 MASON BRADLEY J 1,116.70 3/11/2003
. 2027 MOORE JULIE K 278.08 3/11/2003
2028 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,136.98 3/11/2003
2029 P ANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,165.72 3/11/2003
2030 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,474.78 3/11/2003
2031 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,395.28 3/11/2003
2032 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 707.89 3/11/2003
2033 STARK BRUCE H 1,062.12 3/11/2003
2034 SWANDBY DONALD R 1,277.84 3/11/2003
2035 TOWER TERRY R 1,073.85 3/11/2003
217744 ANDERSON PETER T 96.84 3/11/2003
217745 ARMSTRON MICHAEL R 27.93 3/11/2003
217746 ARUNDEL JAMIE M 155.75 3/11/2003
217747 BAKER RICHARD M 68.57 3/11/2003
. 217748 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,929.08 3/11/2003
217749 DA VITCH JOSHUA R 152.29 3/11/2003
217750 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,711.84 3/11/2003
217751 DUFFY DAVID C 165.14 3/11/2003
217752 GIESEN JON L 206.18 3/11/2003
217753 GOTTSCHAL JACOB S 225.05 3/11/2003
217754 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 814.80 3/11/2003
217755 LATTERNER SUSAN M 174.43 3/11/2003
217756 LAUGHLIN BRANDON M 231.98 3/11/2003
217757 OLIVEIRA CHRISTOPHER L 148.88 3/11/2003
217758 PARENT MICHELLE L 157.05 3/11/2003
217759 PLATHE CRAIG V 89.98 3/11/2003
217760 RIESEN KARL D 263.16 3/11/2003
217761 SCHMIDT ALBERT J 284.64 3/11/2003
217762 SITTLER MICHAEL K 159.22 3/11/2003
Thursday, March 20, 2003
Page 1 of2
.
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date .
.. .
217763 STANLEY DAVID W 228.51 3/1112003
217764 STEIN BENJAMIN E 266.63 3/1112003
Total of Checks $29,826.38
.
.
Thursday, March 20, 2003
Page 2 of2
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
March 17, 2003
TO:
Mayor and Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk ~
.
FROM:
cc:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator \J?
Authorization to Purchase a Print Controller
RE:
The City owns a Ricoh Priport VT3800 Digital Duplicator, which is used for printing the
Newsletter, as well as other flyers and brochures. This duplicator was purchased in 1997. We
have 1.6 million impressions on this machine, and it is rated for up to 6 million impressions;
therefore, it still has a good life expectancy. The machine has been working well, with no major
repairs needed since its purchase.
.
When this duplicator was purchased, it was connected to a Macintosh computer. We were able
to send files directly from the computer to the duplicator, via the network and the duplicator's
print controller. When we replaced the Macintosh computer with a PC, the print controller no
longer worked, as it was specific to the Macintosh computer.
Since we have had the new PC, we have used the following process to print the newsletter:
· Each color of the newsletter page is printed out separately on the laser printer on 8-112" x 11"
pages.
· The 8-112" x 11" pages are cut-and-pasted together to form the 11 "xI7" newsletter size.
· The 11 "xI7" page is placed face~down on the glass of the duplicator, where it is scanned to
make a master. This process is done for each color of ink (black, blue and green).
We have been able to make this process work, but the print quality (especially photos) is not as
clear because the master is being made from a copy, rather than directly from the computer file.
Also, it is more difficult to line up the pages from one color to the next when they have to be cut-
and-pasted together, and placed face down on the glass to make the master.
We purchased our Duplicator from Metro Sales. They tried installing different print drivers, but
the drivers alone did not enable us to send files directly from the PC to the Duplicator. We were
n
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
tt: 38
March 17, 2003
Page Two
informed that we needed a different Print Controller. As this duplicator is considered an older
model, the only print controllers that will work with this duplicator are also older models, and no
longer being produced.
Metro Sales has one Print Controller that it believes will work best with our PC and desktop
publishing software. After several months it has found one that is available for us to purchase. It
is coming from another client who is upgrading its existing equipment.
Metro Sales has indicated that Print Controllers rarely "break down", nor do they "wear out".
This Print Controller will come with a 90-day warranty, but it is expected to last the life of our
Ricoh Duplicator. If it does not work to our satisfaction with our existing PC and software, we
are not obligated to purchase it.
FINANCIAL
In the 2003 Budget, $2500 is identified for upgrades to the Priport Duplicator. This is the cost
for the Ellisis CPIF-26 Print Controller.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION I COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the purchase of the Ellisis CPIF-26 Print Controller
Metro Sales, for $2,500.
a
I
.
.
.
Mar.17.2003 1:45PM
Metro Sales, Inc. 6128612395
No.8000 p. 2
.
(.
~
.
MACHINE SALES ORDER AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
OR/~~ Z,ATE NEW CUSTOMER REQUESTED INSTALL DATE SALES REP. NO. & NAME MAIN PHONE NO.
3 11 o~ X CURRENT CUSTOMER Michael Sanford 9521474-3236
S SHOREWOOD CITY OFFICES c SHOREWOOD CITY OFFICES
H
H A
I 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD R 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
p G
E .
T ZIP CODE T ZIP CODE
0 EXCELSIORi MN 55331 0 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
QTY.ORn. PRODUCT NO 1.0.# oeSCRIPTlON UNIT PR.ICE AMOUNT
1 0 CPIF-26 Ellisis Print Controller $ 2,500.00
0
0
I 0
0
.0
0 . .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O.
CREDIT TERMS EQUIPMENT
TOTAL
SERVICE CHARGE OF 1 % PER MONTH (12% PER ANNUM) OR HIGHEST LEGAL RATE.,
WILL BE CHARGED ON ALL PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
$
2,500.00
SPECIAL-INSTRUCTIONS .
This order is contigent upon print coJ1troJler operating properly.
This i$ a legal BgrMrnent to purchase the its!tIti ~ abOve, and illneludlS$ tile tctmS and COI'IdiliOns of the Seeufil)' A;reement listed orl tile reverse of this document
CUSTOMER P.O. # CUSTOMER#
016799
MANUFACTURERNENDORR.EPLACED
STARTING METER READING TYPE OF BUSINESS. SIC CODE NO,. OF EMPLOYEES
911104 20 to 49
SUPPLY PERSON & PHONE NO.
TERRITORY REPS I SPLITS
KEY OPERATOR
DEPARTMENT MACHINE LOCATED IN
FOR OFFICE USE
SU MA
LEASING COMPANY
LEASe TERM
LEASE PAYME BUY OUT OPTION
'"
...
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDMSION AND COMBINATION
OF REAL PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood (the City) is the owner of certain real property
located in the City of Shorewood, legally described as:
"Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 721, Hennepin County, Minnesota"(the City
Property); and
WHEREAS, Randall and Lauree Cermak (the Cermaks) are the owners of certain real
property located in the City of Shorewood, legally described as:
"Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 721, Hennepin County, Minnesota: and
WHEREAS, the Cermaks or their predecessors in interest, caused a driveway to be
constructed on the east 15 feet of the City Property; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Cermaks have agreed to subdivide and combine their
respective properties into three parcels legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision and combination proposed by the City and the Cermaks
complies in all respects with the Shorewood Zoning Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. The real properties legally described above be divided into three parcels, legally
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. The proposed subdivision and combination is subject to the Cermaks deeding
Parcel 3 to the City of Shorewood for public right-of-way and utility purposes.
3. In consideration of the Cermak's conveyance of Parcel 3 to the City, the City
agrees to Convey the north 157.59 feet of the east 15.0 feet of Tract C, Registered Land Survey
No. 721 to the Cermaks or their successors or assigns.
4. The City Clerk furnish the Cermaks with a certified copy of this resolution for
recording purposes.
'if ~~
~
5. The Cermaks record this resolution together with the deeds referenced in 2. and 3.
above with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within thirty (30) days of the
date of the certification of this resolution.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of
March 2003.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
-2-
r
f
.
.
1
>
,
.
.
Leeal Description - Parcell
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 721, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except for the north
157.59 feet of the east 15.0 feet thereof.
Leeal Description - Parcel 2
The north 157.59 feet ofthe east 15.0 feet of Tract C, and Tract B, except for the south 17.0 feet
thereof, Registered Land Survey No. 721, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Leeal Description - Parcel 3
The south 17.0 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 721, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Exhibit A
~'"
-3-
'.. ..,i'.
...
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
SPRUCE HILL SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the final plat of Spruce Hill Second Addition has been submitted in the
manner required for the platting of land under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462
of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City
of Shorewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. The plat of Spruce Hill Second Addition is hereby approved.
2. The approval is specifically conditioned upon the Developer recording the
EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part
hereof, with the Hennepin County Recorder:
3. The Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are authorized to execute the Certificate
of Approval for the plat on behalf of the City Council.
4. The final plat, together with this resolution, shall be recorded within thirty (30)
days of the date of certification of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by
the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance
therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the
Shorewood City Code.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of
March, 2003.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
Jt-3fJ
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT Strategic Holdings. Inc.. Owner of Lot 2.
Block I.Spruce Hill 2nd Addition. hislher heirs, successors and assigns for valuable consideration
of One Dollar, in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration of the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged does hereby put, assign, convey, and warrant unto
Strategic Holdings. Inc.. Owner of Lot 1. Block I.Spruce Hi112nd Addition and its' successor and
assigns, collectively 11 Grantee" , a non-exclusive easement and servitude for the purpose of entry
to the property of Grantee by a driveway, over the following described property located in the
County of HENNEPIN, State of MINNESOTA, described as follows, to-wit: .
The established 10 foot wide paved driveway on the southwest comer of Lot 2, Block 1,
Spruce Hill 2nd Addition that links the existing driveway on Lot 1, Block 1, Spruce Hi112nd
Addition to Yellowstone Trail.
Grantee shall indemnify and hold Grantor hannless for all claims for injuries and
damages caused by the use of said driveway by Grantee.
Grantee shall make the following improvements to said driveway and shall maintain said
improvements in a reasonable condition, to wit:
10 foot wide pavement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this document on this the Fourth day of .
March, 2003.
GRANTOR
S- LL}"
'T-fc~ -\-e<),'(.. I ,C,)"", ,.., ~ oS
~.~~~
I-='''''-~
~ ~
,-- '. ,.,
.' ... >. J. Ii! - ~
GRANTEE
~+f"<\. k':7:' l-tvl.!. i".. ).if ::r; '" .:... .
./-;?--=:::-.?- L~ f r'" ~ ). ~l.._ l-
Q
- 1 -
Exhibit A
.
.
STATEOF M,'(\(\<'~clGi..
COUNTY OF _~'t'J'\V\'" ~. of\.
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority in and for the said County and
State, on this L./ day of /lIllJ...rc.-"- , 20n within my jurisdiction,
'Sh...x.'l(frl"tt'."'''i' 4.,"'-
the within named /vftJ:llhil~" f"CIL.,,>M Pre.. , antor, who acknowledged that he executed, signed
and delivereGd the above and f~ the date there provided.
,L........<
~TARYPUBLIC -.= .
My Commission Expires:
STATEOF M,,,t1cs".{'IL
COUNTY OF 1-'" ,.,n~.) "7
,
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority in and for the said County and
State, on this t/ day of -M /j...~rc.-tl , 20..Q3 within my
. 'd" th 'thin d fh y..,~anti'<'I-'<.'I1li'1fA-:- 1 d d th h
JurIS lction, e W1 name IVlILUfw.., C.Il/::J, $'.", t 'iI&I!4'Ulanee, W 0 aCKnOW e ge at e
executed, signed and delivered the above and . ing instrument on the date there provided,
Q~;~UB;C
My Commission Expires:
CHRISTINE R. DOYLE
NOTARY PUBUC . MINNESOTA
..;.~ ' .: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
. lii....so... JANUARY 31, 2005
- 2-
t
.
,
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
ENCHANTED POINT
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed vacation of a portion of the
public right-of-way of Enchanted Point in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
was published in the Excelsior/Shorewood edition of the SUN'SAILOR NEWSPAPER on the
13th and 20th days of February, 2003, and in the the LAKER NEWSPAPER on the 15th and 22nd
days of February, 2003; and
WHEREAS, said Notice of Public Hearing was posted in three (3) locations in the City
of Shorewood; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Shorewood heard all interested parties on the
question of vacation at a Public Hearing on the 24th day of February, 2003, in the Council
Chambers at the City Hall.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota, that the public right-of-way legally described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, be and hereby is vacated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in consideration for said vacation the owners of the
property located 4495 Enchanted Point shall grant the City an easement for purposes of drainage
and utilities over, under and across the property legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is directed to notify the County
Offices in accordance with Minnesota Statutes.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th
day of March, 2003.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CITY CLERK
:/136
,
-.
, .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED VACATION:
That part of Enchanted Lane as platted in AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION NO. 354, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
lying northeasterly of a line described as:
Commencing at the most northerly comer of Lot 3 Block 3 of ENCHANTED PARK, thence southerly along the
westerly line thereof 13.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly to the
intersection of the westerly Right of Way of said Enchanted Lane and the southerly line of Lot 17 in said
AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION NO. 354 and there tenninating; ,
.
....
Exhibit A
f
..
.
.
.,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED EASEMENT:
That part of Enchanted Lane and Lot 17 as platted in AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 354;Hennepin County,
Minnesotat described as follows:
Commencing at the most 11:ortherly corner of Lot 3 Block 3 of ENCHANTED PARK, thence-southerly along the
westerly line thereof 13.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence northwesterly
along a line that rons through the intersection of the West Right of Way of said Enchanted Lane and the
southerly line of Lot 17 to the South line of a sewer easement as described in Document No. 4125131; thence
southeast along the southerly line of said sewer easement to the southeast comer of said sewer easement; thence
southerly to the point of beginning.
Exhibit B
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 11,2003
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
CITY HALL
7:00 P.M.
.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M.
DRAFT. .
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Chair Arnst; Commissioners Callies, Meyer, Davis, Young, and late
arrival Palesch; City Council liaison Turgeon; City Engineer Brown
Absent:
None
B.
Review Agenda
Chair A1nst requested that item #8 be removed from the evening's agenda.
. Davis moved, Meyer seconded, approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2003
.
Callies requested that several changes be made on page 8. First, paragraph 4, line one should
read as follows, ".. . Park Commission is its own entity and the role of Council member should be
limited to that of liaison and not have the degree of participation at the meeting as if they were
another member of the Park Commission."
Page 8, paragraph 8, should be changed to "Callies felt that their seating right at the table was
inappropriate. . . " .
.
Page 8, paragraph 16, "Callies maintained that the Commission should be more proactive in
setting its own goals and not dependant upon Council's validation of its 2003 goals."
While she recognized that Council has ultimate control and authority to affect what occurs,
Callies explained that it is important for the integrity of the Park Commission at this level to
consider the issues independently from Council, and likewise for Council.
Palesch arrived at 7:05 P.M.
Chair Arnst asked that a global search and replacement be made changing Meyers to Meyer
throughout the document as well.
Davis moved, Callies seconded, approving the Park Commission Meeting Minutes of
February 11, 2003, as amended. Motion passed 6/0.
B. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of February 25, 2003
.
Callies moved, Palesch seconded, approving the Park Commission Meeting Minutes of
February 25, 2003 as submitted. Motion passed 6/0.
1fSA
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 2 OF 10
3.
MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
.
There were none.
4. REPORTS
A. City Council Meeting of March 10, 2003
Brown gave a brief history of the Highway 7 access closure and construction of the Freeman Parking
lot #4. As spring was slated for rebidding of the parking lot construction, new concerns arose at the
Council meeting last night over the expenditure of money on a parking lot when the City has two
costly road projects to fund this year. With both the Smithtown Road and County Road 19
intersection projects looming overhead, and state budgets in flux, Brown stated the City Council
believed the estimated $200,000 + could be better spent elsewhere at this time. Brown reported that
the City Council decided to hold off on bidding the parking lot project out and directed staff to
investigate new funding options. He explained that a letter to this affect would be sent to the
Shorewood Pond residents. .
Having already told the sports organizations that 76 additional spots would be available this year
with the construction of the new lot, Young asked how these users might react to this news.
Brown stated that he would check into expanding the gravel parking area for now until funding was
available, and further explore other alternatives.
.
Turgeon stated that Council found itself asking how it could justify spending $200,000 on a parking
lot when the City has two other huge projects to consider. She reiterated that Brown would be
coming back with alternate plans, which might include a gravel area like that of the north lot.
For review, Chair Arnst pointed out that 5 years ago, MnDOT was willing to give the City $50,000
to close the Highway 7 access, which would have covered the cost of the new parking lot at that
time, however, in not accepting that offer, the price for the parking lot has doubled or even tripled .
since then.
While Brown agreed that the City could have accomplished the closure and parking lot construction
five years ago, it did not do so, and now is forced to investigate other options, such as posts, gravel,
etc.
Chair Arnst questioned whether the City had committed to a black topped parking lot to the
Shore wood Pond residents.
Since the original brochure that Shorewood Pond residents received showed a black topped lot,
Brown indicated that it might be difficult to explain to the residents that this cannot be done at this
time due to the state of the economy.
While Chair Arnst also felt uncomfortable spending $250,000 on a parking lot, given the economy, .
she encouraged staff to inform the sports organizations of the change as well.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 3 OF 10
.
With regard to the Smithtown Road and trail project, Brown reported that a letter, or petition of sorts,
was dropped off to the City Council accompanied by 15 or more residents opposed to the project.
That being said, he stated that staff continues to meet with property owners and has had several
positive responses to their contacts. He reminded the Commission that this continues to be a mixed
process, with a 50/50 split of support and opposition. Brown promised to keep the Commission
updated, as most of the meetings with the affected residents would take place by the end of the week.
He hoped to provide a report at the next City Council meeting which identifies each of the
neighbor's positions.
Davis asked if anyone at the Council meeting mentioned to those opposed attendees that they've had
numerous opportunities to voice their position.
As a matter from the floor and a very volatile subject, Turgeon stated that this was not the forum to
debate the project. In two weeks this item will be put on the Council agenda to discuss further.
.
After reviewing their submission, Young asked where these astounding statistics had come from. He
questioned where these individuals had been throughout the process and why they had not voiced
their opposition until now. He felt that surely the Commission would not have supported passage of
the project had they known 83% opposed it.
.
Brown stated that, in his opinion, the statistics don't necessarily add up to what he is hearing as he.
approaches people independently.
Young reiterated his astonishment that, after years and numerous attempts to hear from these people,
it isn't until now that they have come out to voice their opposition.
Chair Arnst asked if staff had met with these people.
.
Brown stated that staff is now aware of those in opposition to the project and will not approach them.
He stated that, in typical road improvement projects, a 30-35% range of participation is unheard of,
whereas, the City has succeeded and should be proud of engaging up to 40% of the affected people
and getting their participation throughout the process.
Turgeon argued that these individuals opposed to the project should have submitted their statistics
long ago, or even last night, but they have failed to do so. She questioned what value the statistics
could have at this point in time as the process has already evolved beyond a certain level.
Young inquired how the item would be addressed on the next City Council agenda.
.
Turgeon stated that the next time the Council reviews this issue, it will be a matter of reviewing
Brown's report of support and opposition which will be used to decide whether the City moves
forward with the project or not. She saw no value in delaying the project or taking a step backward
at this point after 5 years into the process.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 4 OF 10
B.
Concession Stand
Review Memo from Twila Grout
Brown indicated that, according to Twila Grout's memo, Jon Gurban ofthe Mn. Park and Recreation
Association reported that many communities are getting out of the concession operation business and
leaving it to sports organizations or nonprofit groups to lease.
Update on Appeal Process with Health Dept.- Larry Brown, Public
Works Director
Brown reported that the appeal process has begun and that a formal submittal for re-review of the
original report has been made by Attorney Keane.
Chair Arnst asked how long the appeal process would take and emphasized the time sensitivity of the
situation. Based on her past experience, Chair Arnst inquired whether the City Attorney would need
City Council direction to move forward with this appeal.
Brown stated that the Attorney is making an application to the Health Department for a new review,
as well as, repeal of the old decision. Brown was hesitant to challenge the Attorney further, knowing
his current obligations to the City.
Meyer indicated that she foresaw no way to execute concessions this year at this point. She asked
where the City was headed with their investigation, since there was no money to improve the
concession in the first place and any information obtained by the Attorney would not be available
until after April 1.
Brown encouraged the Commission to continue the review process, stating that at least, the
concessions would not operate at a loss this year if no progress was made.
Young inquired whether Little League, or any of the other organizations, had expressed an inkling of
interest to operate the concessions. After obtaining the Health Department report, he encouraged the
Commission to offer the concession operations to one of these organizations for a minimal flat fee.
Chair Arnst asked whether the City could solicit interest of the sports organization concession at the
north end of the park to run concessions here, stating that she did not want to lose money this year.
Chair Arnst encouraged Brown to challenge the City Attorney and his staff to move this forward as it
is a time sensitive issue to the Commission and she did not wish to see it delayed.
Brown pointed out that, while he would do his best to work through the Attorney and his staff, he
reminded the Commission that the Attorney currently has 33 active issues he is tending for the City.
Although Turgeon stated that she could bring a message that time is of the essence back to the
Council, they would not be meeting for two weeks and therefore time would be lost. She reminded
the Commission that the City Council has slated the concession for review in October.
.
.
.
.
.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 5 OF 10
.
Palesch felt the concession operation should be offered to nonprofit or sports organizations from the
standpoint that the Health Department seems to turn a blind eye to their operations.
Chair Arnst asked Brown to solicit interest from the 3-4 sports organizations at Freeman and report
back at the April 8 meeting.
Meyer maintained that once the sports organizations realize that there is money to be ,made here, this
could be positive for the community. She suggested that contact be made and that the sports
organizations submit a letter of interest prior to the next meeting, which she and Commissioner
Callies could follow up on.
C. Update on Park Coordinators and First Weeks of Operation - Larry Brown
.
Brown reported that things have gone very well, and to date, over 99% of the documentation has
been submitted by the sports organizations, a process that in the past had typically required 8 weeks
to accomplish. Although, in his opinion, the meeting was a success, Brown anticipates that after the
schedules are complete the week of March 24th, there will be some grumbling over the changes being
made. A first draft for the schedules will be reviewed soon.
Chair Arnst asked about the status of the software for the park coordinators.
.
Brown reported that, after much review by Community Rec Resources, a software program has been
purchased by the City for their use. He noted that web site links will also be added to the Shorewood
site that sports organizations can visit to see scheduling changes and rainouts as they occur. He
reported that Community Rec Resources has also established a good rapport and opened the lines of
communication with MCES's new representative, Carol Shear. In fact, MCES has stated that they
would continue to carry a voicemaillink for Shore wood parks via their phone line for the sports
organizations to access.
.
Chair Arnst asked if Brown felt he was being alleviated of the sports organizations and scheduling
pressures of the past.
Brown indicated that the City is taking positive steps along that path and he still believes that year
one will be a challenge with regard to scheduling, parking, and education issues. He stated that he
was excited to see where this was headed and had a positive outlook.
5. CAPESTONE PONDS P.U.D. - RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING TRAIL
Applicant: Capestone Builders
Location: 20775 Manor Road (Carmichael Auto Salvage)
.
Reporting for Nielsen, Brown explained that the City has received a 12 unit development proposal
for the property currently occupied by Carmichael's Auto Salvage. Since that time, Greenwood
residents to the west of the subject property have suggested that the City either require the developer
to construct a trail or sidewalk along Manor Road, or the City should use its park dedication fees of
$36,000 to assist Greenwood in constructing such a trail. Brown pointed out that the twin home
units in the project would be oriented to Excelsior Boulevard on the east side of the parcel, and that it
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11,2003
PAGE 6 OF 10
would be difficult to require any developer to install off-site improvements, such as those the
Greenwood residents have proposed for Manor Road.
.
Brown pointed out that, given the limited financial resources of the park fund, there was some
question to using that money for a trail that would be of little benefit to Shorewood residents.
Furthermore, Brown displayed pictures of the terrain along Manor Road which clearly underscored
the difficulty in locating a trail along Manor Road.
Chair Arnst clarified the Greenwood resident's position, which would be to have Shorewood build a
trail in Greenwood with Shorewood's own park dedication funds on the Greenwood side of the road.
Brown confirmed her interpretation and questioned Greenwood's rationale for the trail on either side,
yet alone the Greenwood side, of the road given the topography.
Chair Arnst inquired what Greenwood was proposing to add to the pool for the trail construction.
.
Brown indicated that he had not heard of any contribution by Greenwood for the construction
project. He questioned why Greenwood would presuppose that Shorewood would support putting
their money, tight as it is, into building a trail in Greenwood, especially when the twinhomes
themselves fall on the eastern portion of the property existing onto Excelsior Boulevard. He pointed
out that the destinations along Manor Road don't seem to exist, nor does the traffic warrant the need
for a trail.
.
Chair Arnst maintained that, in her opinion, based on the terrain, the proposed trail would be costly.
While she would be willing to consider a small token donation to Greenwood in its efforts to build a
trail, she had difficulty justifying the need for a $500,000 trail for a limited number of people.
Based on the discussion, Brown asked the Commission if it would be there consensus this would not
be a high priority item. The Commission agreed.
.
Palesch moved, Davis seconded, that the proposed trail plan for Capestone Ponds was not a
priority for the Park Commission to take into consideration at this time. Motion passed 6/0.
6. LRT CLEAN-UP DAY
A. Discuss Feasibility of Doing Joint Clean Up With City of Excelsior and Three
Rivers Park District
Chair Arnst reported that, based on a contact from Lucille Crow of Excelsior, an effort was made to get in
touch with the Three Rivers Park District, the County, and Excelsior to promote a joint clean-up effort
between the three for the LRT. She stated that little interest from the County has been expressed for this
joint effort and that the Park District had merely given the City the go ahead to clean up the trail.
In Callies view, the Park District and County sound happy to have the City go in and clean up all the junk, .
but have offered little in terms of a partnership to do so.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 7 OF 10
.
Chair Arnst indicated that most of the debris and trash are near the Excelsior border and that dog feces
would be the biggest problem facing Shorewood. She felt the initial suggestion had become considerably
more entangled than first thought, and was hesitant to start something visible in the public eye which says
it's okay to dump, because the City will clean it up.
Callies suggested that the City run newsletter articles encouraging residents of the trails to clean up their
yards and/or perhaps embarrass those who do use the trail for public dumping.
As a wetland and trailside resident with firsthand familiarity with the problem, Davis volunteered to write
the article.
7.
CITY'S DOG ORDINANCE
.
A. Determine if Dogs should be required to be on a leash on the Southwest
LRT trail
.
Turgeon explained that a recent letter received by a Shorewood resident sparked the dog leash
ordinance debate. Although the Three Rivers Park District requires a 6 foot leash on the LRT in the
summer months, she indicated that, during the winter months, the trails become Shorewood
jurisdiction which allows a 10 foot leash and/or voice command. The City Council has proposed a
change in the Ordinance which would match the Three Rivers Park District 6' leash requirement
making this a year round requirement. Turgeon asked the Commission for their thoughts on the
language of the proposed Ordinance and whether the Commission felt the Ordinance went far
enough in its requirements.
.
Chair Arnst indicated that, in her view, trails and parks should be viewed separately. She believed
the biggest problem was that people don't clean up after their pets and felt the addition of mandatory
receptacles in an owner's possession should be added to the Ordinance. Chair Arnst shared the
sentiments expressed by one Smithtown resident, who voiced concern that, with a trail in their yard,
pet owners would leave messes behind.
Callies stated that irresponsible pet owners leave a mess behind whether they walk on a sidewalk or
in the street, as in her neighborhood. While she felt the City should be consistent in its Ordinances,
she recognized the need for better enforcement.
Davis pointed out that she was cited in Minnewashta for not having a receptacle for her pets' waste
only minutes after using the one she had with her.
Chair Arnst asked for a recommendation which would require receptacles and 6' leashes at all times.
Furthermore, she encouraged Turgeon to relay to Council that an ounce of enforcement would be
beneficial at the parks and trails on occasion.
.
Meyer asked if new signage would be necessary.
Chair Arnst indicated that dog owner education was a 2003 priority for the Park Commission, and
felt the Commission would need to develop a plan for signs and education.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 8 OF 10
Davis moved, Callies seconded, that the Ordinance requires 6' leashes on the LRT, .
recommends leashes in Public Parks and pedestrian spaces, and requires pet owners to have
receptacles in their possession at all times.
Further discussion centered on the term recommends, as Meyer felt this was not strong enough
language. Callies suggested investigation is done to determine what other cities require, she could
support shorter leashes on trails and sidewalks and longer ones in the parks.
Davis amended her earlier motion to state, the requirement for 6' leashes on all trails,
sidewalks, and the LRT, and that pets be leashed at all times in public parks, as well as, the
requirement for receptacles in pet owners' possession at all times. Motion passed 6/0.
B. Consider Adding Language to Ordinance That Clean Up Receptacle is
Required
8.
TRAIL PLANNING PROCESS
.
A. Clarify the term "Consensus" per Smithtown Road Pedestrian Space
Discussions
Removed from the Agenda.
9. DISCUSS CONCEPT FOR PARK COMMISSION SEMINAR
.
As suggested during the 2003 goal setting session, Chair Arnst discussed ideas for a Park
Commission Seminar with the objective of bringing together park advisory groups, liaisons, board
members, staff people, and commissioners etc. for the purpose of training, motivating, educating,
and networking. Since that time, in conversations with John Gurban, of the Mn. Park and Recreation
Association, he voiced his enthusiasm to partner with Shorewood in this endeavor. Although the
format was yet to be determined, she felt there were many things this Commission has accomplished
that the bigger cities are not doing yet and are unique or of interest to other communities, such as, the
user fees, equity policy, park coordinator position. Chair Arnst felt the Commission had much to
share, as did most other communities, and this would provide a workshop opportunity to share
resources. She asked the Commission whether there was interest to move forward with this proposal
as leaders in the Park Commission world and encouraged volunteers to step forward and assist her in
this endeavor.
.
Brown concurred, reiterating that Shorewood is fortunate to have such a progressive thinking Park
Commission and he was amazed that when asked for samples of equity policies etc, John Gurban and
other communities had nothing to offer that was as comprehensive as what the Shorewood
Commission had created. Brown complimented the Shorewood Commission on its cutting edge
philosophies and felt this seminar would provide a good opportunity to network with other
communities.
Davis asked if the Commission would charge for this event.
.
Chair Arnst felt that they could charge, say $15, for the seminar and a box lunch.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 9 OF 10
. Meyer felt this to be a win/win for everyone involved.
Callies stated that, while she would like to assist in its execution, she felt they should limit the event
ge~graphically .
.
Chair Arnst stated that Mn. Park and Recreation does nothing like this and was eager to partner in
this effort. She suggested the use of the Southshore Senior Center for the workshop. She pointed out
that in the past, the Planning Commission has hosted a similar successful event for 14 communities.
Turgeon pointed out that at a recent convention she had attended with other Council members from
various communities, she took pride in the fact that Shorewood's Park Commission was beyond
those of larger cities. After hearing numerous Council members report they would be cutting back
on park services within their communities, Turgeon shared with them how the Shorewood Park
Commission has initiated a park user fee and other fundraising efforts. She stated that many cities
expressed interest in learning how Shorewood does it and would like to be given the opportunity to
hear first hand how to initiate programs in their own Cities.
Chair Arnst and the Commission agreed that this would be a good avenue to pursue in a year that
funding is limited.
10. DETERMINE DATE FOR JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
.
Brown suggested April 8 for a potential joint work session with the City Council. Commissioners
Callies and Davis indicated that they would not be available on that date. Brown stated that he
would work to propose an alternate date.
11. DETERMINE COUNCIL LIAISON FOR NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
.
Meyer stated that she would attend the next March City Council meeting.
12.
NEW BUSINESS
Chair Arnst asked if any Park Commission applications had been received. Brown indicated that
the City had not received any applications for the position. Chair Arnst suggested they contact
applicants from the last Planning Commission application process to see if there might be
interest generated form those applicants.
Chair Arnst asked Brown to update the Base Cost Data sheet he had compiled several years ago
which reflects the cost for basic services within the City, including turf care, maintenance, etc.
She felt the new dollar figures would be shocking.
Chair Arnst if Brown had heard anything further with regard to the ventilation problems at the
Little League concession booth. Brown stated that he had not heard anything further from Little
League regarding this matter.
.
Chair Arnst questioned the status of the sports organization park donation forms. Brown
reported that the scoreboard is the only outstanding donation at this time.
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2003
PAGE 10 OF 10
'j.
13.
ADJOURNMENT
.
Young moved, Palesch seconded, adjourning the March 11, 2003 Park Commission
Meeting at 8:47 P.M. Motion passed 6/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
.
.
.
.
"
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DA TE:
March 18, 2003
.
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:
Larry Brown, Public Works Director
CC: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator cIt>
RE: PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON DOG ORDINANCE
At its meeting on February 10, the City Council considered an amendment to the existing dog
ordinance, which would require dogs be on leash while on the Southwest Regional LRT Trail.
Council directed this item be given to the Park Commission for further discussion and
recommendation.
.
At its meeting on March 12, the Park Commission discussed this item, and approved a motion to
make the following addition to the City's current dog ordinance:
The requirement for 6' leashes on all trails, sidewalks, and the LRT, and that
pets be leashed at all times in public parks, as well as the requirement for
receptacles in pet owners' possession at all times.
Staff is also recommending language be included for proper sanitary disposal of dog feces.
A copy of the existing ordinance with the recommendations noted above is shown in underline
on the attached Exhibit A.
Also attached is a Draft Ordinance for Council consideration.
ft
'-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
--. /..:.. C./b---'
-!-+- 0 /
701.01
SECTION:
701.01:
701.02:
701.03:
701.04:
701.05:
701.06:
701.07:
701.08:
701.09:
701.10:
701.11:
701.12:
701.01:
701.02
CHAPTER 701
DOGS
Definitions
Enforcement
Registration and Licensing Requirements
Limitations on Number of Dogs
Running at Large
Dog Nuisances
Confinement of Certain Dogs
Impoundment and Redemption Procedures
Rabies Control
Destruction of Certain Dogs
Prohibited Acts and Conditions
Violation
.
DEFINITIONS: As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall mean:
Subd. 1. ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER: Any law enforcement officer of the City
and the person, firm or corporation charged by the Council with enforcement of this
Chapter. (Ord. 81, 11-25-74; amd. 1987 Code)
Subd. 2. AT LARGE: A dog is at large when it is off the property of its owner and not under
restraint.
Subd. 3. DOG OWNER: Any person who owns, harbors or keeps a dog or licensee thereof,
or the parents or guardians of such person under eighteen (18) years of age. (Ord. 81, .
11-25-74)
Subd. 4. RESTRAINT: A dog is under restraint if it is on the premises of the person
harboring or keeping the dog, or if the dog is with the person having custody of it and
is effectively restrained by a leash or chain or is within ten feet (10') of the person
having custody of it and is obedient to the command of that person. While in public
parks, on all trails, sidewalks, and on the Southwest Regional LRT Trail. dogs must be
on a leash not more than six-feet in length.
Subd. 5. DOG WASTE DEVICE. The person having custody of the dog must have in their
possession a device for removal of dog feces when in or on City parks, trails.
sidewalks. public rights-of-way, and the Southwest Regional LRT Trail.
Exhibit A
701.06: DOG NUISANCES: It shall be unlawful for any owner to fail to exercise
proper care and control of his animals to prevent them from becoming a
public nuisance. It shall be considered a nuisance for any animal to bark excessively,
continuously Of untimely, to frequent school grounds, parks, or public beaches, to
chase vehicles, to molest, annoy or bite any' person if such person is not on the
property of the owner or custodian of such animal, to molest, defile or destroy any
property, public or private, or to defecate in or upon public property or the property of
another without being cleaned up immediately by the person in charge of the animal.
Failure on the part of the owner or custodian to prevent his animals from committing
an act of nuisance shall subject the owner or custodian to the penalty hereinafter
provided.
.
Subd. 1. The phrase "to bark excessively, continuously or untimely" includes, but is not
limited to, the creation of any noise by any dog which can be heard by any person,
including a law enforcement officer or animal control officer, from a location outside
of the building or premises where the dog is being kept and which noise occurs
repeatedly over at least a five (5) minute period of time with one minute or less lapse
of time between each animal noise during the five (5) minute period. (Ord. 232,
9-10-90; Ord. 334,4-27-98)
Subd. 2. The person having custody of the dog is responsible for disposing of the dog feces in
a sanitary manner.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
-DRAFT-
ORDINANCE NO._
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 701 OF THE
SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO
DOGS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 701.01, Subd. 4 of the Shorewood City Code shall be amended to read as
follows:
Subd. 4. RESTRAINT: A dog is under restraint if it is on the premises of the person harboring
or keeping the dog, or if the dog is with the person having custody of it and is effectively .
restrained by a leash or chain or is within ten feet (10') of the person having custody of it
and is obedient to the command of that person. While in public parks, on all trails,
sidewalks, and on the Southwest Regional LRT Trail, dogs must be on a leash not more
than six-feet in length.
Section 2. Section 701.01 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to add:
Subd. 5. DOG WASTE DEVICE. The person having custody of the dog must have in their
possession a device for removal of dog feces when in or on City parks, trails, sidewalks,
public rights-of-way, and the Southwest Regional LRT Trail.
Section 3. Section 701.06 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to read:
701.06: DOG NUISANCES: It shall be unlawful for any owner to fail to exercise proper
care and control of his animals to prevent them from becoming a public nuisance.
It shall be considered a nuisance for any animal to bark excessively, continuously or untimely, to
frequent school grounds, parks, or public beaches, to chase vehicles, to molest, annoy or bite any
person if such person is not on the property of the owner or custodian of such animal, to molest,
defile or destroy any property, public or private, or to defecate in or upon public property or the
property of another without being cleaned up immediately by the person in charge of the animal.
Failure on the part of the owner or custodian to prevent his animals from committing an act of
nuisance shall subject the owner or custodian to the penalty hereinafter provided.
.
Subd. 1. The phrase "to bark excessively, continuously or untimely" includes, but is not limited
to, the creation of any noise by any dog which can be heard by any person, including a
law enforcement officer or animal control officer, from a location outside of the building
or premises where the dog is being kept and which noise occurs repeatedly over at least a
five (5) minute period of time with one minute or less lapse of time between each animal
noise during the five (5) minute period. (Ord. 232,9-10-90; Ord. 334,4-27-98)
.
.
.
Ordinance No.
Page Two
Subd. 2. The person having custody of the dog is responsible for disposing of the pet feces in a
sanitary manner.
Section 4.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect following its passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of
March, 2003.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
..
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2003
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
DRAFT
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M., apologizing to the audience for the delay. He noted
legally the meeting could not begin with a quorum, and a Commissioner had returned from out-of-town
for the meeting to take place.
Present:
Chair Bailey; Commissioners Borkon, Pisula, and White; Council Liaison Lizee; and
Planning Director Nielsen
Absent:
Commissioner Gagne, Packard, and Woodruff
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
· February 18, 2003
Pisula moved, Borkon seconded, approving the February 18, 2003, Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes as amended, on Page 1, Item 1, Paragraph 1, Sentence 5, add the word "the" to become the
phrase "for the future." and on Page 2, Item 1, Paragraph 1, change the word "appendage" to
"appendix." Motion passed 4/0.
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - C.U.P. AMENDMENT FOR MULTIPLE SIGNAGE AND
CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANS FOR P.U.D. - SHOREWOOD
VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER/CUB FOODS
Applicant: Shorewood Village Shopping Center, Inc.
Location: 23680 Highway 7
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:38 P.M., noting the procedures utilized in a Public Hearing.
Matters recommended for approval this evening would be placed on the March 23,2003, Regular City
Council Agenda for further consideration.
Director Nielsen explained construction had begun on the CUB Foods Store at the Shorewood Village
Shopping Center. As part of the financing for the project, lenders required the grocery store occupy its
own parcel of ground. Staff had directed the developer to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development (p.U.D.), as a P.U.D. contained the mechanics for the proposed "zero lot line"
arrangement necessary for the site, as well as the joint use of parking and drainage areas. It also ensured
the development agreement executed in conjunction with the original CUB Foods store addition would
continue to apply to both parcels. The issue was essentially a legal matter of drafting an addendum or
amendment to the original development agreement that tied both parcels to the requirements imposed on
the property. It was recommended the City Attorney be directed to draft such an addendum for recording
the final plat (replat). Upon approval of the resolution approving the final plat, the developer must record
it and the development agreement with the County within 30 days of Council approval.
Director Nielsen went on to explain the second issue involved a request for multiple signage for the
Shopping Center. He noted this request was not part of the original plans approved, as signage was not
ready at that time. Signs for the existing Shopping Center were regulated under a CUP approved in
October of 1999. He also explained the regulations and allocated signage, based upon the square-footage
of the building silhouette. He stated the addition of the CUB Foods store increased the amount of signage
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
March 4,2003
Page 2 of6
,
allowed for the property. He reviewed the design and measurements of the proposed signage, noting the
Zoning Code limited the sign to 20 feet in height, where a 30-foot height had been proposed. He also
recommended the sign be shifted west as far as possible to maintain adequate sight triangles for the main
entry in to the property. Director Nielsen also recommended the allocation for interior tenants be
increased accordingly with the regulations based upon the 10 percent requirement. Also, he noted the
new C.D.P. would contain the same language from the development agreement for the project, which
stated the City might remove unauthorized signs at any time.
John Uban, representing the developer for the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, stated he agreed with
the recommendations of Staff, and would stand for further questions.
There was no further public testimony on these matters, and thus, Chair Bailey closed the Public
Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:48 P.M.
In response to Chair Bailey's question, Director Nielsen noted more flexibility would be given to the
developer as part of a PUD, and the City would be granted more control of the project through its use.
Pisula moved, White seconded, Recommending Approval of the Concept and Development
Stage Plans for the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, Inc., 23680 Highway 7. Motion passed
4/0.
.
Pisula moved, White seconded, Recommending Approval of the Conditional Use Permit
Amendment for Multiple Signage for the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, Inc., 23680
Highway 7. Motion passed 4/0.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Hearing at 7:49 P.M.
2. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANS - mGH POINTE P.U.D.
Applicant: Lecy Construction
Location: 23520/23570 Highway 7
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 P.M.
.
Director Nielsen reviewed the history of the project, noting in November of last year the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a three-lot subdivision called High Pointe. The
Commission recommended the City Council approve the concept stage plans, but continued discussion of
the development stage plans pending resolution of certain issues raised by staff. These issues had been
addressed, and were ready for further consideration this evening.
Regarding the issue of ponding, the preliminary grading plan for the project showed a small detention
pond on the northwest side of the proposed street. The City Engineer must approve the location of the
pond, and the size of the pond was also subject to the Engineer's approval as part of the final plat. He
also explained runoff calculations should be submitted with the fmal plat to verify pond sizing.
Director Nielsen noted the northerly portion of the site had been designated as an outlot, and as such,
would not be buildable until formally replatted. He also noted all proposed lots met the standards of the
RI-C Zoning District.
With regard to access to the site, Director Nielsen reviewed the comments by the Minnesota Department
of Transportation (MNDOT) regarding the project, noting Staff had, uncharacteristically in this situation,
recommended direct access from Highway 7 to the site. He noted this unusual recommendation from the
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
March 4,2003
Page 3 of 6
City was due to the devastating situation that would be created with trying to extend a cul-de-sac through
the site from the northeast as proposed by MNDOT. Issues of maintenance of the strip ofland the project
shared with the Church could be resolved as part of the final plat.
Director Nielsen also noted the developer had provided a reforestation plan for the project, including a
mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. The final plan must be signed by a landscape architect.
Director Nielsen stated it was recommended the development stage plans, including the preliminary plat,
be approved.
Peter Knaeble, representing the project, explained he was present to answer any further questions the
Commission may have had of him.
.
Doris Mierendorf, 6065 Burlwood Court, stated she was present as a trustee of the Our Saviors Lutheran
Church, adjacent to the property. She stated she was concerned for how the site would access Highway 7,
and was concerned about the closing of the entrances to the service road, as well as median cuts along
Highway 7.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:57 P.M.
Director Nielsen explained the site would not be easy for new residents to get into from Highway 7, as
MNDOT, while having no direct control over the property being developed, would most likely close the
median cuts on Highway 7 that would have allowed easy accessibility. This access had also been
addressed in a Conditional Use Permit with the neighboring church in recent years, so that the church and
associated school would still be able to function.
Commissioner Pisula questioned the recourse of the church should residents of the property choose to
utilize the private roadway to the church rather than follow the designated traffic patterns of Highway 7.
.
Mr. Knaeble stated representatives of MNDOT had indicated the center median cut would be closed
should the project be approved as planned. However, he noted the project included the addition of three
homes, and would not likely cause a great deal of traffic in the area.
Discussion ensued regarding the potential traffic patterns residents of the project could take to access
main roadways in either direction.
Mrs. Mierendorf questioned whether responsibility could be established to repair the entrance to the
original condition should it be damaged by construction vehicles. Director Nielsen explained this issue
could be remedied in the development agreement and construction vehicles should be directed to access
the site only from Highway 7 and not through the Church entrances.
Mrs. Mierendorf also questioned the impact of the retention pond planned for the site. Director Nielsen
explained the retention pond for this project was designed to prevent downstream problems.
White moved, Borkon seconded, Recommending Approval of the High Pointe Development Stage
Plans, subject to Staff recommendations, including conditions that the construction traffic be
advised not to utilize the Church service road, and following construction of the new road the
westerly entrance to that service road be restored to its original condition. Motion passed 4/0.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Hearing at 8:19 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
March 4,2003
Page 4 of 6
3. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - C.U.P. FOR ACCESSORY SPACE OVER 1200 SQ. FT.
Applicant: Steve Hanson
Location: 28105 Boulder Bridge Drive
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 P.M.
Director Nielsen explained the applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (C.u.P.) to construct an
attached garage and room addition on his property, located at 28105 Boulder Bridge Drive. The property
was zoned P.U.D.lS, Planned Unit Development/Shoreland and contained 33,060 square feet of area. He
went on to explain the existing house combined with the new additions would contain approximately
6142 square feet of floor area in the two levels above grade. The existing garage currently contained 960
square feet of floor area, and the proposed garage contained an additional 400 square feet, which brought
the total area of accessory space on the site to 1360 square feet, and thus, necessitated the request for a
C.D.P. He noted the new garage would be an extension of the existing garage, and the second level living
space would be built over both the existing garage as well as the new garage.
With regard to the criteria for granting this type of C.U.P., Director Nielsen stated the project did not
exceed the total floor area above grade of the principal structure, and also did not exceed ten percent of
the minimum lot area for the P.U.D.lS Zoning District. He noted while the property complied with the
setback requirements of the P.U.D.lS Zoning District, the property was currently nonconforming with
respect to hardcover. The applicant proposed reducing the amount of hardcover by eliminating one of the
driveway entrances and necking down the existing driveway to bring the hardcover from 26.7 to 25.9
percent. Additionally, the new garage addition would be integrated into the architecture of the existing
house, and no additional landscape was required at this time.
.
Todd Knutson, architect for the owner, was present to answer any questions the Commission may have
had of him.
Seeing no further public testimony, Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public
Hearing at 8:24 P.M.
Chair Bailey requested clarification on the Zoning Code requirements regarding the practice of reducing
the nonconformity, and Council Liaison Lizee requested clarification on proposed retaining walls for the .
project.
Borkon moved, White seconded, Recommending Approval for Granting a Conditional Use
Permitted for Steve Hanson, 28105 Boulder Bridge Drive. Motion passed 4/0.
Chair Bailey recessed the meeting at 8:30 P.M., and reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
4. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONE -
CAPESTONE P.U.D. (continued from 4 Februarv 2003)
Applicant: Capestone Builders
Location: 20775 Manor Road
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 8:36 P.M.
Director Nielsen explained this matter had been continued from the February 4, 2003, Planning
Commission meeting, pending receipt of the environmental studies ordered for the site. The City had
received the Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, prepared by Liesch
Associates, Inc. Director Nielsen also noted the site boundary issue had been resolved, noting the entire
site was located within the Shorewood City limits. Director Nielsen recommended the Comprehensive
-.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
March 4,2003
Page 5of6
Plan be amended, revising the Proposed Land Use map from "Minimum Density Residential (0-1 units
per acre) to "Low to Medium Density (2-3 units per acre). Also, the area plan for Planning District 12
should include language tying the increased density to the provision of city services (i.e. municipal
water). He further recommended that the Concept Plan be approved subject to the recommendations
included in the Planning and Engineering staff reports distributed for the February 4, 2003, Planning
Commission Meeting, and the Park Commission's recommendations should be incorporated into the
Development Stage approvals for the project as well.
Roger Anderson, engineer for the applicant, stated the applicant wanted to move forward to the next step
of creating a Work Plan with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MnPCA), which would include a
test pit for further testing of the site. He anticipated the test pits for heavy metals could not be conducted
until at least the second week in April.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 8:41 P.M.
.
Commissioner Pisula questioned whether monitoring wells had been dug as part of the environmental
study, or if existing wells on site were utilized for testing of groundwater. Mr. Anderson stated
monitoring wells had not been dug on site. However, the Phase I Environmental Study had been
conducted in coordination with soil testing to determine the contaminants in the soil and groundwater. He
noted the Work Plan may recommend monitoring wells be placed on site following groundwater
identification of contaminants.
Director Nielsen questioned the timeline for the Work Plan and its impact on the project moving forward
this year. Mr. Anderson stated he believed, based on experience, that the contamination of the site was
localized, and he would have a better timeline available after the beginning of May this year. He went on
to explain the process of the Work Plan and potential impacts upon it from the MnPCA.
.
Commissioner Borkon questioned the use of test pits versus soil borings for the site. Mr. Anderson
explained the soil borings were used to determine structural support and groundwater levels for the site.
He further explained soil borings were used to get a preliminary look at contaminants in the soil and
groundwater. Logs of the site indicated contaminants were mainly localized in the upper 2.5 feet of the
soil and groundwater. Test pits would show localization of soil contaminants and samples could be taken.
Heavy metals did not percolate into the soil very far, and were most typically found in the upper horizon
of the soil. The test pits would define a limit of contamination for removal. He stated the applicant
would like to see an indication that moving forward with the expense of testing would be in the best
interest of Shorewood in this project.
Commissioner Borkon asked what kind of support the City would be providing. Mr. Anderson stated the
City's support would simply be support for the clean-up efforts, rather than financing the efforts, as the
applicant would most likely be investigating grant opportunities for clean-up of the site. Mr. Anderson
went on to state he believed the clean up would be fairly routine, and would involve identification of the
problem, cleaning up the soil, and moving forward with the project, thus, he was not anticipating
difficulty through the permitting process. He also noted removal of the soil would likely be the most cost
effective measure of removal.
Commissioner Pisula questioned whether testing for impact to the existing aquifer would be conducted in
the next phase of study. Mr. Anderson stated the applicant did not intend to sink a test well to test the
water any further than had already been completed, as it was anticipated that effort might become part of
the Work Plan. He also stated to cut off the source of the hazardous materials would stop further
contamination.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
March 4,2003
Page 6 of 6
.'
In response to Commissioner Borkon's question, Director Nielsen explained the City's responsibility in
the long term included assurance that the agencies responsible for the clean-up process were moving
forward appropriately, and the process was adhered to as part of the clean-up.
Pisula moved, Borkon seconded, Recommending Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
and Concept Plan, subject to Staff recommendations, and that the project be served by municipal
water. Motion passed 4/0.
5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
6. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
Director Nielsen stated the March 25, 2003, Planning Commission Agenda included a Study Session
format regarding the Metro. Transit Opt-Out Study, and review ofthe Parks Master Plan.
7. REPORTS
.
· Liaison to Council
Commissioner Pisula reported on matters considered and actions taken at the February 24, 2003, Regular
City Council Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
· Liaison to LCEC
There had not been a meeting of the Land Conservation and Environment Committee since the most
recent Planning Commission Meeting, thus, there was nothing to report.
· SLUC
No report was given on the Sensible Land Use Coalition Meeting.
.
· Other
No other business was reported at this time.
8. ADJO~ENT
Borkon moved, White seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of March 4, 2003,
at 9:14 P.M. Motion passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Sally Keefe
Recording Secretary
..
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
3 March 2003
RE:
Shorewood Village Shopping Center - Replat and C.U.P. for Multiple
Signage
FILE NO.:
405(03.05)
Replat
.
As you are aware, construction has begun on the CUB Foods store at the Shorewood Village
Shopping Center. As part of the financing for the project, lenders have required that the
grocery store occupy its own parcel of ground. Exhibit A shows how the land is proposed to
be divided. Staff has directed the developer to apply for a conditional use permit for a
planned unit development. The PUD process contains the mechanics for the proposed "zero
lot line" arrangement and the joint use of parking and drainage areas. It also ensures that the
development agreement executed in conjunction with the original CUB Foods store addition
to the shopping center will continue to apply to both parcels.
For zoning purposes the two parcels will be treated as one. Consequently, the issue becomes
a legal matter of drafting an addendum or amendment to the original development agreement
that ties both parcels to the requirements imposed on the property. It is recommended that
the City Attorney be directed to draft such an addendum for recording with the final plat
(replat). Upon approval ofthe resolution approving the final plat, the developer must record
it and the development agreement with the County within 30 days.
Conditional Use Permit - Multiple Sh!na2:e
The Shorewood Zoning Code provides for multiple signage for shopping centers through the
conditional use process. Signs for the existing shopping center are regulated under a c.u.p.
approved in October of 1999. The previous c.u.p. allowed as much as 905 square feet of
,.
\.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
if: 6.A.
Memorandum
Re: Shorewood Village - Replat and C.D.P.
3 March 2003
signage, based upon a 9045 square-foot building silhouette. The owner of the center
allocated the allowable signage as follows:
Major tenants:
Interior mall tenants:
Center identification:
450 square feet
175 square feet
280 square feet
The addition of the CUB store increases the amount of signage allowed for the property.
Besides the increased area of the building silhouette as viewed from Highway 7, the
inclusion of the former Driskill's property makes the property a comer lot, allowing the west
elevation of the building to be included in the area calculation.
.
Exhibit B shows the proposed location of a new (long overdue) pylon sign for the shopping
center. The design and measurements of this sign are shown on Exhibit C. This is a
relatively large sign, measuring 16' x 30', and 480 square feet in area (on each side). Since
the Zoning Code limits freestanding signs to 20 feet in height, the sign must be reduced in
size. Assuming the width will be the same, the area of the sign will be 320 square feet. The
site plan shows the sign being 15 feet back from the property line. It is recommended that
the sign be shifted west as far as possible to maintain adequate sight triangles for the main
entry into the property.
As shown on Exhibit D, the developer proposes three wall signs for the CUB Foods store.
All of these signs are displayed on the south elevation of the building, consistent with
previous approvals. Since the shopping center has been enlarged slightly, the allocation for
interior tenants should be increased accordingly.
.
While the building and sign areas have not been calculated as of this writing, the proposed
signs appear to be well within the 10 percent of building silhouette requirement in the Code,
particularly if the freestanding sign is reduced in size. It is recommended that the sign plan
be approved, subject to. the conditions contained herein. The owner should reallocate signs
based upon the 10 percent requirement. The new c.u.p. will also contain the same language
from the development agreement for the project, which st<;ites that unauthorized signs may be
removed by the City at any time.
Cc:
Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Stan Taube
John Uban
-2-
.:.__0;;; \-'1~
\10.
f\' tr u)
.---- t- 'f Ui :--\
~tlu'l
",,\IOlJ!.
~z ~biii
~ ~~ ..!1o.NO 6'2S"E 176.21-,_
: <' /.../~ wi I~{::!{ \...,~ '~~_Y"
~~<" --:11:~/3 ! j "'~")-r-
~~j. /'l,., ~... lS~
~ :t' /} ii ~ E; 6~
(:;> !iilfi " ::~;
~4, V -. 'I
I I I
... '" lJ!.'..
C"I
~ I' I ~o".} ~l
1 "...~ I
~ ,~.).' I '\..E.LlNEOF!.OT
i ~ - tv- \ , ' II. LINDEN PARK
CIf - r - \ ----'.,~~~r::O- ----n'C/eBRi:I,r;r~?1?E- - -r - --
ll! ~ \ ~ I/....~ \ f
J i ~~ Ave-:~J) < j r) ~cM6~ AVE.)
o I~a~ i MAi!::~rVE.
o J~i ~ ~
'f'-- !;~ ~ l;
p ~;
UOIlIPPV ~~-enI^ pOOM~lOl(S
l.Vr:Id r:IVNI~ a~SIA:tfH
V HQ1t{Xg
..
\ '
/
..~~ ~ ~~. ot,. /
" ....'0 /
....... VI.>
--
C.
6r
~~ ~
..
c:'"
;~7116' '"
2li~6...__ \
1'"
ill
~
C::l
';
......
,
\
\
\
146.30-,_ .......-
!"Z
",,,,
-'"
~
-l ~
!'"
C::l
';
-..
"
, .
\oIJ ,;
<
0 U)
-A c.:
tli
,,)
~
<:
'..
,~
-..
11"17"'
L.VI
.., -,,,
I /V
!'"
C::l
';
-..
"
~3
(')
i3:!
~I'.~~
.\\!...~~
'!l ~ 'ib Cl'.
~. --
,g, ~'cc, "".
U; \
.s, ........
~
\
\~
't.>,
-,
<-
~i U)
'!!$
i:li --
e:",
!i! C.)
"
<-
'-..... SO"24'29"W 241.00
SO"24'29"W 2n.42 I --:tiJ.
g CllP
I ~8
-1-g: \
\, Eo LINE OF!.OT 173 ~ j!!il!
lO!,
l~
!O
S)
....'"
.....,
s,...
<.....')
~
<", ,
,
....,
s,...
"
\ ~
, ~
i~\
~ 'j'j i
~~~~
01_'0'0 ~
\';) ....
Ul.;;:: i
l"'1 IP~
'" 'i
~
~) C~
" _~~,~c;,'
">>~
1..
-;,
l"..
II
<Iii
I:
!i!,z ').,.
~i c.-
ii~ -
~ ~ ,,)
.
g:
~r
~I:
j!~
~
i
'1
-'
~ ~
... .
'" .
j
I J
\/
.-.._--~.."
jell!
lO!,
I~
!O
..-
...
..
()
!'"
::l"
c)
==tJ
r'1
e,)
%.-+
~
~
fi
~
~
c
e
--\
C,)
~
r
-
M
):
~
.....
.....
.....
(
.....
<
:.':)
t:)
.;f\ LrJ
f.L LJ
~tJ
o
9. dl t:1
J --1---
rr, . ~SET
. ~
\ \-:-::~ !
--- ------= _---1
- ----.
( ,-
~
_ SITE NOTES
. AU. lltUOlSIONS SIiO'AN ARE 10 FACE. OF QlR8 UNl.E5S
NOtED OlHER.sE
. c:oN1RACTOR SllAU. FIELD \OIFY 1HE LOCA1lONS N<<)
ELEVA1IONSOF DIS1lNG U1lU11ES AND 1OPOGRAPHIC
fEAlURES, SUQf A$ DIS1INO GUT1ER GRADES AT 1HE
PROPOSED \lRNEWA'WS, PIlIQR 10 1HE START OF SI1E
GRAllINC, 1HE CON1RAClat SIW1. lUIIEllIA1E1.Y
N011FY 1KE DIGlNEEIl OF 1M'( IIlSCIlEPAHClES OR
YARlA1IONS FROM 1HE fUNS.
. HANDICAPPEI) PARICINC STAUS wu. BE PROWlED NIl)
1OEN1lFIED PER IDA CODES AND LOCAtED ON SI1E AND
SlGNAGE PUN FOR CONS1lIUC1lON.(SEE SlGNACE. Pl.NI)
~:o: LIlE
. AU. aJR8 AND GU11tR 10 IE CClNalElE 84512 U
NOtED 0'1HERYCSE.
. AU. aJR8 RADI wu. IE 5..0' UNl.ESS N01ED 01H
. CONCRE1E APIlONS 10 IE INSTALLED FOR AU. II.
ORM:S ON 10 PUlIlJC $1l&1S PER aTT STANO'
. REFER TO UGH_ PlAN FOR F001CNlOI.E PR111
. IIULDINC DIIotEJISIONS REFER 10 0U1SlDE OF IIUIl.
FACE (nP.) UtC.ESS O'IHERIISE N01ED.
-
5tf
. c........:__:
EXISTING RETJ
69,153 S.F.
SUPERMARKET
59,945 S.F.
\
\
~ ~ \
~ -~~ . \ \
~~
\~a '\
\ ::a.~
e\
"\
\
\
,
,
\
\
J
-
Slfc1~
.
.
. ., .'
'" ." :.;
.. ,,' ,,'
~
I
in
..'
.::'. ..~:.:. ~h~.rewo.6.d..:..\!il.I.~..g.~:..: :':"::.:.:. .~.
.... . ~ .' :' ~ . . ,- ':.' .' . .' ". :.. . ":' . . . '. . . .
.' : '. ........ ....... .... -.. ..' ". ':LEIFS CORNICE
TO MA TGH BUILDING
INDIVIDUAL ILLUMINATED
CHANNEL LETTERS
13'-0.
,--
-
-
-
-
-
-
I--
I--
~ oofu
I-- -
~JF@@@~~
I--- {(.I--
Q .........
6 -' ___ I-- f:::::::
coTENANT .. v -
TENANT
TENANT
TENANT
Q
I
Q
b
I
(0
d:>
I
~
>-
~
PYLON SIGN
3no- = 1'.0-
i1 ttl KKE Archltecta,.lnc.
K K A 300 Ilrlt ~Yenue north
m1nnelpoU" mn 55401
612/339.4200
arch it e cts 612/342-9287 fax
....n.apo.. newport ....ch ....
- INTERIOR ILLUMINATED
SIGN CABINET -
DOUBLE SIDED
PREGOLORED Crv1U
TO MATCH BUILDING
5 H 0 R EW 000 VI LLA - Exh: C ??oo,,,... """"'.....
SHOREWOOD, MN PROPOSED PYLON SIGN
A.
B
c
o
G
CllI-4 PIlA5lER
SAS[
C9f1J cr (7) C6J ~ Cf. g::;:-:-;::.':,7 t1:2. ..\,., /"".~(2J~, (1J
~~~ '~~:~;~~.~~r. ~ v::;=~.~:::-:::f~,. :USTOREFRONT~' .rr::::~G~~ i :=':~<I 'O)'.~.}J %c '; ./ ~~~:~ T
, , , nr il'4iilorr EfS CORNICE 'B'~ . ,ElFS CORNl:E 'A' ,DASHEI> ltEillENOTES r-EFS CANOPY---"'I' EFS CCRIIlCE 'A' : ..... f1( EO '" (g~' "" EO ~ IfJAl " He-I ~""'Al COP..L1 T"" ~
CJ 2 r :.1/ CJ = - rQlu NPE-1 r.1. \. \ SIGN SNEAlHtlG BEHIND /! ~ .= X CJ. CJI""""'f I, / rEfS CORNJ 'A' mv.=
"''I<?:d ~..,."" .="""'ZI"'"'r"" .!\J / ~v.= If-4 .,... '0 .--CIAU j-Z II IE ' l" {Sf! ADJACENl Rt
CJ - ~~~f-- ~~~~'rr:i--If--- --1--1--11"v,--~/-I-- ~~~~E;~~-::~0r~~~~,: ~J-~;i--I--I--l--cWT;E:'FC---~--tJ-- -------:~-- -o-~-o-~---o=------------- -- ~,\oo: ~"'~~~~
p ----- ~ CJ IMySJllrbm lBlAWlK "'" I I I(H 1-\1' ElFS REtES ~ <::j ., _.:l.. \{ ii)f I I r' EfS II!:DAW~ ~ k --- -CIIU T'IPE-2
oJ .... \\lT1I'II1IIl' :;:"AA . - .' -NP. CMU m>E-3 - 6 / '
~ lll:$ !YllIIJJHO. IUrililllrllll -G -.... / -'" l'1l'. '-.- -. COlUMN -NP. ",-, / TOP (F CA.!f...
:r ~ ; ~~ .... .. \ ~,,/ -(N1RY SlGNAGE , 0 - i -::::: 0 ::;:;; ~ :::::::: -;::::::.. l\ -" 0 ~ - ~ -.:::: eMU TYPE-Z \ "'./' "JI ", I -- :,...." ~ __ BOTTW Qf ;~
~ ;=r ~. a I l!!!!J (8H\ ~ '\ J 0, G "" IC\ · 0,. /to 0, · , ENlRY SlGNAGE U I I,.n:.. I b '8H\ '" d_--i--- CIIU TYPE-I
~ ~)i \ I"'''' -'I C \I~ ~ ~: l' \~ CJ "II \ CI \ ;'f' Cl ~ /to ~ 1- CJi: r ~ '\ ~ '\ / '~; 9f"'I~I~ I Eiil~ ~ ~ "-~ClAUPUS~.~:
GIAU TlPE-zj \/ \ \~~;~~N~ -NP"~QlU TYPE-2.J CMtJ M-l":'; LALUWIHUM STOREFRONTJ \ CIAU rlPE_1J ~:~:~. CUl' NPE-,J J LCllU l'rl'E-I..J (~:LUMI~W ST<IlEFRllHT ~;CUU m>(-1 '~CllU TYPE-3
PILASTER ELEV.
CMU TlPE-I .-J CMU m>(-4 PllASlER SYSltW \ '-CMU NPE-3 CMU m>E-Z SYSTElI \ L CIAU l'rl'E-4 COJlIIN
HOLlOW IlETAL DOOR \ ALUUlNUoI DOOR AND . CIAU TYPE-! BASE _ TYP. AlUIlINUII STOREFRlINT.....J cue TYPE-4 PIlAS1EIl BASE -NP. o.tU TYPH PIlASTER
AND fllAME -PAINT TO AUJMINUM STOREfRONT""" FRAtoE: ASSEIIBtY CUU m>E-I W. BLOCk CllU m>E-4 P1LASn:R SYSTElt BASE -NP, ALUMINUM DOOR AND 1UIE sm A_a BASE -T'lP.
MArCN CMU NPE-l SYSTElt BASE -rIP. FRAME ASSElI8l.Y -PAlNl CONCRE1E CURB -T'lP.
lUBE sm A~ING -PAM . CCl!CRElt CURB - NP.
~AL COP1Na-;~
'[FS CORNCE 'B'~ \
.J-- ::. c::-: ~ !EfS COrNCE "A' \ . \
"r ~'~~-"1l~~"
TYPE-3 ......,
ElFS CORMCE .A.......--...... " coo '\
~ WID,.,,...' ""--
"r tLl.Y.' ~. -u 1jo
eMU TYPE-3 --.""
PlASTER ~ ~
QIU TYPE-I --f ':.I
CItU TYPE-Z ....
~ ...., <nn:rr ~~
'-I" !lEV.' 10-0
QIU TYPE-I ---s;
~"N" n,.., 1: :tt~
"r .......= v-v
TCfu"W.
CJ
CMU T'IPE-4
COUJIIN BASE
21Cl SOUTH ELEVATION
PRECOlORED QlU
WAll 1IE'1lM. AS
SCHEIXJlfD
cp
,
I
,
I
,
I
cr-
,
I
Cf(
I
I
I
I
I
I
cp
,
I
,
I
I
I
cp
cr
I
C?
I
EXTERIOR MATERIALS &; COLOI
~
GIAU NPE-1._.._.........SPUlFACE, 'SPANISH ROSE' 1822
QlU m>(-Z-................SItIDDTHFACE. SCORED 'AN11OUE IVllR
CIIU TVPE-3..__......BURtfSIfi, HALF HIGH 'SI'ANISH ~
eMU m>(-L.............SPUlFACE. 'AII1tOUE lvart' 1328
CMU m>(.S_...............SMOOT\II'ACE. 'NAlUfiAl GREY'
Cf
I
I
,
I
I
.jllf:lAl COPING-I I
__ _ - - --- -- ---- ~-- -- - --. --- --- -C>! - - - - -- --
CJ CJ CMU NPE-2- ...
. ClIU TYPE-I~
QIU TlPE-Z--............
SRICK m>(-1 CANCPY
BEYOND
''$'
I
I ~lf.=r.~t ~
, I IZ II--- METAL COPNG-I
I '{g. ~~~dl ~
ElFS CORNICE . A '
~~
ri ~G-I ~+ I ____ =CKCC::l'~~Y
- Q;;;:f1 ----~- El1T.f.'~4~~
. ......-:: f=lUlIE STEEl. AVHNG
CJ ElFS CORNICE 'A' ---- CJ -PAINT
. __ ~ CIAU TYPE-3
QlU m>E-3 --- "CCLUMN - TYP.
PILASTER A
tLt... IV-U Y
....--- ~ TYPE-4 COlUMN
6/ BASE -NP.
i=! ...... "',.., A
""" ........ u-u y
"'-CONCREtE CURB - TYP.
AT COUJllN L0CA1IDNS
1\JBE S'l[El. AIlNIIG:
PAIHT...._._......_.....TO MAItH 'FoREST GRE(N' AS
NANUFAClUREO BY BY PElERSON
ALUMIIIJl/ CORPORA~OH
I
, ./" __ ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
\___ PENlHOUSE BEYOIlO
METAl COPING-I \. .
____________________L______ _ _______________________
CJ CJ
.~: EANlSHEI> STEEl
METAl COPING-Z . c mAD DOORS - NP.
~...\'~~:,I, r lCK PADS-HIe.
ROOFTOP HYAC
UNIT BEYOND
$ Iv.~ If-Oi ~ ~~._=-
-. CJ "'.;j"" -... -
METAl COPtIG-Z ~ I
..... J!lI' or~WL'WiLL \~. -. .-
'PI'. l:J.t.V.-, -'0"
CWT -lSCRlIN_
WAll 'tfNl \ ~ ~
~ ......~j",.
"r 'C<Y'llinv U
BaJ.ARO -l'Il'.-.-/
CJ "\ CJ
'-DASHED UNE DENOlES
ROOF SLOPE BEYOND
JmIll\..!lW:.
BR1CK m>(-I................unuTY 'POTOIlAC CLEAR' 199-26
IIElIlEN BRICK COMPANY
CJ
CJ
.....-'1.""
LIGHT AXTURE - NP. -------
~
EFS COlal-A..............__1O BE SElfClED BY ARCHllECl
~-ii:iiil
ClIU TYPE-4 PlLASTER--.J..-1 ~ ~
BASE -NP. ~ / ~ '!U
DASHED om DENOlES ~ !:
-- -~-~~-~~-}------~
---------1 r----+-Y-- I ["==-1
1-" "" 1,--.--.
i-Ii :i-i
~T .--1 II
~:lJW\ BUlo\PfJl -Nit:.....
L DOCK LEVElER -Ne.
CAST IN PlACE COHm
AT LOAOIHG DOC!( WALL
I4e"'\
\."-1 J
'--"'"TYP.
[5{
"
,
tlE1LllftSl.
METAL COPING-1..............PREANlSHEI> 'AUIONO'
UNA-ct.AIl
NETAl COPING-2............PREFINtSIIEO 'eRANOY\\1NE'
UNA-QAIl
CMU TYPE-I~
~
oaT ~GNAGE--.I
'- HIllOW METAl DOOR
AND FRAME -PAtlT 10
WoItH CMU l'Il'E-I
AlUU1N\J11 DOOR ANO
FRAItE ASSEMBlY
"- BllLIRD - NP.
INOl[;
C<>>IlROl .klINTS (e.~) AT MASlHlY
PIlASTERS TO BE AT EITHER EJ)G( -l'Il'.
BOU.ARO - TYP.
I 3/32'.,'-0'
I ILEV.
6F I MATERIAL LEGEND
21 F I WEST ELEV A iriON
A
BRICK TYPE.I -----........
CANOPY ,_ '"
$ Rfv?,FW I
IlETAl COPtHG-I ---.jJ "::l
$KH..C~~ i.
IlFS CORNICE 'A"
~~~CE. ~.._. i ,.
~ rllf:lAl COPING-I
Y rs CORNICE 'A"
.cr
I
I
,
I
,
I
cr
I
I
cp
~
,
I
,
I
,
I
C?
,
I
cp
,
I
Cf
,
I
I
ROOFTOP MECHANICAl ~I
P!:HlHOUSE BEYOND f
--c E Z
(4E:l ~
,
~
. I .y-:~~~~G-l
I
I L ROOFTOP HVAC
UNIT BEYOND
I
f- 1
:
,
v---EFS ~ICE 'A'
/ r~d~~,
I
I ~ROOFlOP HVAC
UNIT BEYOND
I
r
i1
METAl COPING-I ""\
Exhibit D
PROPOSED WALL SIGNS - CUB
<I
.(
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
SHOREWOOD VILLAGE ADDITION
WHEREAS, the final plat of Shorewood Village Addition has been submitted in the
manner required for the platting of land under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462
of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City
of Shorewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
.
1.
The plat of Shorewood Village Addition is hereby approved.
2. The approval is specifically conditioned upon the Developer executing and
recording the FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by
and between CITY OF SHOREWOOD and SHOREWOOD VilLAGE
SHOPPING CENTER,INC, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof,
with the Hennepin County Recorder:
3. The Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk are authorized to execute the Certificate
of Approval for the plat on behalf of the City Council.
4. The final plat, together with this resolution, shall be recorded within thirty (30)
days of the date of certification of this Resolution.
. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by
the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance
therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the
Shorewood City Code.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of
March, 2003.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
~
)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
and
SHOREWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, INC.
THIS AMENDMENT, made this day of March, 2003, by and between the
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and
SHOREWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, INC., a Nevada corporation (hereinafter the
"Developer").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Developer entered into a Development Agreement with the City
relating to the development of the Shorewood Village Shopping Center.
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to subdivide the Subject Property described in the
Development Agreement to allow for separate ownership of the shopping center and the Cub
Foods grocery store.
.
WHEREAS, the Developer has made application for plat approval of the Shorewood
Village Addition to create Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and guarantee contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
The owners, successors and assigns of Shorewood Village Addition agree to be bound by
the terms and conditions ofthe Development Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
on the day first above written.
SHOREWOOD VILLAGE
SHOPPING CENTER, INC.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
.
By:
Its:
By:
Its: Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Its: City Administrator/Clerk
Exhibit A
~
,
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On tins day of March 2003, before me, a Notary Public.within and for said
County, personally appeared Woody Love and Craig Dawson to me personally known, who,
being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City
Administrator/Clerk of the municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that
said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its City
Council, and said Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said corporation
Notary
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of March, 2003 before me, within and for said County, personally
appeared ' of Shorewood Village
Shopping Center, Inc., the Developer, described in and who executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged that it executed the same as its free act and deed.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
1500 WELLS FARGO PLAZA
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMlNGTON, MlNNESOTA 55431
(952) 835-3800
843134.1
2.
.
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
..
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
26 February 2003
RE:
High Pointe P.D.D. - Development Stage Plans
FILE NO.:
405 (02.29)
.
In November of last year the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
consider a three-lot subdivision called High Pointe. The Commission recommended that
the City Council approve the concept stage plans, but continued discussion ofthe
development stage plans pending resolution of certain issues raised by staff. Following is
how those items have been addressed:
1. Access. As expected MNDOT objects to the new private road extending down to
State Highway 7. Staff will respond to their comments by reiterating that trying
to access the property from the north would be devastating to the site. MNDOT
admits to not having purchased access rights for this segment of the highway.
The City Engineer questioned the ownership of the current service road. After
researching the subject, staff found that the two homes that occupied the site
previously were there long before the church located to the east ofthe subject site.
One of the homes was built at the end of World War II. The other dated back to
the turn of the century (the 20th century, that is).
2. Trees. The developer has provided a reforestation plan for the project. The plan
(Exhibit B) proposes a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. The deciduous trees
form an entry into the site, while the evergreen trees provide screening between
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#0. C,
."
Memorandum
Re: High Pointe - Development Stage
26 February 2003
the new houses and the highway. The final plan must be signed by the landscape
architect.
3. Ponding. The preliminary grading plan for the project (Exhibit B) shows a small
detention pond on the northwest side of the proposed street. The location of the
pond must be approved by the City Engineer. The size of the pond is also subject
to the Engineer's approval as part of the final plat. Runoff calculations should be
submitted with the final plat to verify pond sizing.
4. The northerly portion of the site has been designated as an outlot. As such it will
not be buildable until it is formally replatted.
.
Based upon the preceding, it is recommended that the development stage plans, including
the preliminary plat, be approved.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Roy Lecy
Peter Knaeble
.
-2-
.
'....
.........
. _":::;::,~~ ~.~.: .....:._:..:..:~ ,";..:.._ :';';.0 ~.. _; _U~;~.. "'" .........
i' I
... .~:~=:~=: :i~c'..~=.: ~.~:..:~~:::=~~::'::-\=)
......----.--..-.-.- ...
'.'
.
/....L.f(-1'f-..-..
.. .....~-
/.. II
.1' ./-\\ '. \\.. ':
........ '\ '
-.", .~
'-,
"'.
"
.......--.. .....
:8
~
....-.............--...._ ':.( ".:.;' .::,iD~'~'-_:r.:.: t.4F~E~.
--..-.... ........-.-..-.............-,
,..)
.. ,
.
Development Stage
\
..LiJ~\it_.i 'i
-
.
.
~1..l!GlE.Jlll,
u
~
(!) I
~ ~ !
~ 'Ctl '!
Ih! ·
~ ~111
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
.\ Ii 1\ \
I I I
\ \ I, !
, \ I . !
I l ~ I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
!
i
!
i
\
\
I
I
I
\
1DTE:S1
. All lilt. grading. uwty c....~ and pavi1Q _II H coropI.f.d par - r~ts ., - Sol Cng/M.,..
T/w Confracfor moll 1d>ftIuj. _ SolIs Cflpl?Hr .. f/lCIf "",f/flcGfJofl ., all lilt. grading. IJ'ftlty ~tn.c-" and
pav/rlfl ifill H -" 10 _ D..- and t:ngN.,. oIa+ll1 and _ """I'I.fJo1l., tho proJKt. T/w_.
~~::::,/~.,.~~ bl. ~71ft.
. All _1iWd or... (.""'~ powtd or.." 10 H ,..rtt1NId _ , on t.".... and H .oddo'" or
:"'~c:,,~~ ~.:.::;I:. "/:- ':-.brl-~~a=~f""""'" and _I ,.."....., af_ - tUf'f fa
~~ :: :n"':"Alr:..~ ":.::.co: ~~~"t:'"b/~ a:t:C':-:':?ba~r:."';;: ~~
:,~~:,:,or;::t, ".t .tort _If ...'1<< .'1 _...ry"......ttlr "'... - obto_ I'M Con__ ,.
r..""".... for conf.~ 10 _ ,."qut-.......ts .f -.. pan<It&
. T/w CIty SfGfl/llard """_ .nd /Joto... /tI1JIlT Statidard Spadflt:a_ a/01lf/ - - Sp4dfIt:A-
and 1I>rtab propaNld Y _ rn;..,. .""" _rfl - proJKt.
. T/w,oca _ or _ ""*~ ufII#O. ;,0." .NI ..".....,- to only. T/w Confrac:tor to 0lPrlfy Ilf./ty
roca_ by contocti'lQ GophIIr Staw an. Call a51~__ prior to aflY .=...-
" All .tot:kpl.. 10 H .-,I - .....1lQ# ant f"na.
F'lHAL IClUSE Sl.RVtYS 'lll SHl'W PRtI'OSCI F'lHAL IClUSE GRADES.
RET_ "IUS. _AT lilAllES. nl:. AETAINIIIi "IUS
T1I IE llESlGlO I\' IIl1GS MGI _Ell I\' crrY.
F1NZlHEll SlJllfWS tuV. AT _ CoGAR. tuVJ
I' ICLD IIlMC lFRlIII .......-: EUVJ
GIWIIlCl GlWC
U''IIlI'SIm.
CllIlTIILI.D nu. ll'tlt SlIIL ENGIt)
TIP IF sy...u: ..-. ll'tlt SlIll. DGU
FULL WALKOUT (WO)
TYPICAL HOUSE PAD DETAILS
YDUFY JlIM, iii IltVtLlIPtL
::='AT..
TllCIILVDJ
LQCA TION MAP
Ie SCIU
~N
~
~ i, i ~7R-1C II, i'
~\ i\ i. \\\~ - ~ ZONEnCOMMERCIAL bl, == ~,~~~; ",~~~~, !oc f / (U~'ct/
I' \.~ ~ ~!I
~ EX. SHlIPPING CENTER ",Cl L
I \ \, :- ~ >'-- - 1 ' v I......EX, HJUstr-, .~" ;; \
. ~ I ," - - .. ;:a= ~ 2 \ 0'- I- / I:.. I ~ Q \
\ l ;: : I' I.. l"---i V ;:;-:::-;:;;;/'\ ~ (,:..,~ 6 ~ h I EX. HJUSE rv EX. HOUSEl C' f *11 \
, ...,.. ;~ h 1 . 0' ..... ( 3yr--'\ / I n L--.- lC: / :
. l' i/ // .. ,'_____ " . \ ",-,",-, '" I ',,/ '-J · . ~..;.
'. \....~~i.,../ ~ ,~\...;.;... .....- ~ __EX.BIT.P~RtCINGAAEI\ '. \ ~ ~~~ &~~) (4 -;;- 5~ ---;~~: > 6 '
, ,/' _ .. .. . ~'r.'......... . I 0 8 ll./ tJ. /
\ " (' I\,"r-- III_~_ "---,.- - - - -:::---.---.k. ,,,.! i' '" ; ~ ~ ,.Jjl"\ ~ .. ,I 1....../ CA
';: (( :';..-_--.x::::- _~~'"' - '......_-- - -- Ji ~ <..1~' \...,,' t:'. ,.. ,.. ,
\"'\\\\\\~~ i ~~n_= >."",,' ------:-;. ~~ ) .)~'!tM.matCloU) \ \ \ 1
',:~\\\\\\~\~, ,,<'f ~ "~ ,?"'-- .-. _ ~ :'-=, "', ~ ~_ 'BV ".)/ {; /^-- ~~~ <( / .,..-- - - ~f
\ \\ ':.i I\\'~\\'\ I{'\\\\~\,};~l .~~ F"OUN~r\~~\~\'\\ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ j ~I / / Ii., 7~/~~ .--7 -'-'.......- ~~\\~';-, .N"'" ~.r .i r-' '\".0... ~~"''' '\' \
I ....' \'.'1' II 1\'.,\" - .... --~l(JVtIt '-..'\' ~;\" VI \ \ I VI, i '..,I~V f'"' ........_.~ .,". \.... I r t \ -~ ~,,"""''\'\!'
I i\~,\\" \\\\\:' '.,\~~, ~ e!:'!.I"1 -......... BLOCI' 1 \ '\..4un ~ \ I j 'i.) :~. :.,..; -~~., -"- \ I f i ~\ \~\,.. \'
, :::.~
\ \S\,\~ ~:"' '" ~ . "'- -:Y))/ ,)'l,p~ \ <i\i ~ : J __ . ,';,' \ \~---\..; ", ( II
. \~\~~::~~~:~'\ . ,~~,~_~~-T~-"""~~ ~~~ -: ~~ l)'~I\1.'.'~~ J.m:::..~ ~ ',\~ J \." l ~ I~ I!. 1 \~. \
\ ~ '\\,.~S\", ,--.~,3.'-- /i ~~EMD' ' u? ~':\' \ ::l"} I..E..--,....a.eaac.l . .~\.!\ :---................../! _J. 31 (' \\ ~ \
\ \ \ \,~V \\\"'. \. \; ~......,::.;. ''A'?' L.1' V .r:' I "~=:.: 'r.:' ii ....:.-..... ZONED" R-1C ( , \ l.
~ \ \ \..>.. ti\'~~ \ " ~ ~iI:r:::..--V'I. u.wJ,lj '! '%1 WTLDT c I ~ ,,:~J ') ,I: ~.~. \ 'i ~~.., '\...
<" \ \ \ \-;;\ t\ ~\ ~\'i " 'I", ~ '7 - 'IJJI/J!/ii ~ ');" ~ Lit Y ~ . , ~ ~ ^' , '
'~~\.\~~~ ~ '. ~~",y.f'~?1r{~~1 _ ]!~ ii\,., . ,'~:::~
\ "~ '\ \ ~\ o~~ ~aft -~ ~. r~~~'/~~l ]y~,II/:~ . ; ~ \ L~ II . ~j\' ,{ I (....v ,~: It ---(~.::::
'\ \ t_ Y ./. ~Mal, . l{... -er:: ~/ i.'Il\;, ;. ~ ~ ,.1. . .:). .. ..\.. ;\, l ~ \ JJl ; .
\ \0." l \ ~\ \:\'\ ";. """'\1.:""' YlSjI \ . ' ..:...." ~~~. / ~ . j.~ . l J (N/ 2 EX, HOUSE
" \ ~ ~\ I IS' ,- "l I, ~ " -."0.;.... ----.' ';'" 'P K il"
\i \' I 11/ ., ~ I ' ...... . '/. ~ . (J\ ~~ .2
\ .. I , IJL"'" ~ '~- ',.:w.J' . -.,.;.. . . ~ 2)IC ...~ ~ ' ,.
V
~ \, . .: ~ ~ . . .eX' ~.,./ ~ '-~. '\ r I'r.~~~ V ~;r~ ~~ d' -~-'-~ - "'\., ,\,~~
. V,. '.;.A . F.... " ,\ i:"ar I - \-')' '\ L..... ~ 8'......:=--t..~...., "\ ~~~
'" .':~ /r. - - ._-f';+~I-J1ii. J \ ~. ,;( l/ - -~ /(~~j- ;, ( Ri!:~ ..~
\\ \ ~ =~.&.~ ',- :iJ-.:or, .~ f \ \ .' ,\(:.~, . I' I . .~.~ I ~. r-
~ 'Y \--, ~lr$.." 9-' ' ~ 71 ~ t ,J \{ , / ,-' ~ ',,, ,:::" i" tL.1 \ ~r'i):-G.~J'../~~ .. ~~...
";'" ~ , : ~ iioiV, 'L. ~ _."""'" 7" \ ,~,' ,I -'" '~, '. ') : '1 ' .' -, ~I. """'" .~'"
~ ,,'-~~. ~~ \j~ c(, __II EX. HDUSt I ( '........" ,. \. ~ ....,.~ ,,' "f..~ "'" ....\. J -, ~)~
, "', \ "'i"l1lo.o. ~ '... ..\" -a-U , '. ". I, . ../ -........... \ \ .. I ..... \ J
~l - ~'~,~ '~': ,~')~~~~ ~~-:.~'~~~~'~~\~~), /"-.;8' '(<~~f{f)''(~~;F~-~ ~ j\, ~ ~
~~ :-"', t\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,~.. 1t;\" '..... ~ EX! . GI\R. l J ; tx. HCllSE J IlGI\II. . ("\
, '- " ..:",' "'-;. \ ~~~ g, C'I ~.J; == ' EX. HlI I ~ 1-' g
~ " '. ,\ ^'~ j \:: . ZONED I~~~TIONAL " -- ~ '" r GI\R. 'ill il~ t" .rt~i EX. HOJSE
--
JIlAW -.
0CDlD _
W~U~~~TDlSI 1M
T_ ..... .. " -..... - - ·
T_.......~-- 191
-='.rT'':-~ _... cr. _.. ~ it....
-_......~--~
i
~~1 I ~
~iUi ~
t~~l I
l.hl" ..
lUi!1 II
TRfZ ~ATJIIt ta"lD
L ContoCt _ Citl' ~ IlI\lO. me-47"- to
__.~.....___Citl'
--protor-",,-_.
.. ol_p....----IM-
~--....-Iot_--.a
~..=~=-~~ar. _
~"l" .... p....-- - - lot __ - "I.... Sa..
S. r.. ~ """ .... __ of - ...... ...........
i
it
~
~
<t
I-
C
~ ~
~ !
mW~
~C
l-4C
C:>
o..l.IJ
:J:Di::
as!
:J:'"
I
_ SUM:T I\' __ _ Cll\GIUll
ICIII. LIlT rASEMENT . ... aHTPEll III UlT UICSI
__ UIIIT N<<A . U6 AC. 0IItI.. lIFI'-srro
..-...,,-.--
mIlL aTE 7. IGtD
~......
m~
LECT CllNS'l1IIJClll Ilc.
ISll& _AT 7
=-,~...='
.......... Ml__
ICIII. LIlT SIZE 10_ fI '
ICIII. LIlT \iIllTH IIlO' CAT Ill' I'1llJIT JET1IQ()
ICIII. LIlT 1lIl'lH leG'
I'DlT $ETIllQ( Ill'
SIIlC $ETIllQ( Ill' (Ill' ClIlNEID
- $ETIllQ( ....
mz_W.',f1axCP'Cllftl
Q.AIIS_ r
.....__ IX
QA.~. ....
MIe
1/29/03
Exhibit B
PRELIMINARY GRADING 'PLAN
... =
\.... .
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
27 February 2003
RE:
Hanson, Steve - C.U.P. for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200
Square Feet
FILE NO.:
405 (03.06)
BACKGROUND
.
Steve Hanson has applied for a conditional use permit to construct an attached garage and
room addition on his property, located at 28105 Boulder Bridge Drive (see Site Location
map - Exhibit A, attached). The floor area of the new garage, when combined with the
existing attached garage brings the total area of accessory space on the property over 1200
square feet. The property is zoned P.U.D./S, Planned Unit Development/Shoreland and
contains 33,060 square feet of area. Exhibit B shows the location of the existing house,
garage, and the proposed garage.
The existing house plus the new additions will contain approximately 6142 square feet of
floor area in the two levels above grade. The existing garage contains 960 square feet of
floor area.. The proposed garage contains an additional 400 square feet, which brings the
total area of accessory space on the site to 1360 square feet. The new garage will be an
extension of the existing garage. The driveway serving the new garage is shown on
Exhibit B. As part of the project, second level living space will be built over both the
existing garage as well as the new garage.
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:IF 0. D.
Memorandum
Re: Hanson CUP
27 February 2003
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
Section 1201.03 Subd.2.d.(4) of the Shorewood Zoning Code contains four specific
criteria for granting this type of conditional use permit. Following is how the applicant's
proposal complies with the Code:
a. The total area of accessory space (1360 square feet) does not exceed the total floor
area above grade of the principal structure (6142 square feet).
b. The total area of accessory space does not exceed ten percent of the minimum lot
area for the P.U.D.lS zoning district (.10 x. 40,000 square feet = 4000 square
feet).
.
c.
The proposed garage complies with the setback requirements of the P.U.D.lS
zoning district. It should be noted that the property is currently nonconforming
with respect to hardcover. The applicant proposes to reduce the amount of
hardcover by eliminating one of the driveway entrances and necking down the
existing driveway. Hardcover on the property will go from approximately 26.7 to
25.9 percent.
d. As shown on Exhibits C and E, the new garage addition will be integrated into the
architecture of the existing home. As such the roof lines, materials ~nd
architectural character of the garage are consistent with the principle dwelling.
The garage/room addition will appear as a one-story structure from the rear and
side. The mass of the front of the building will be diminished by the topography
of the site.
.
ill light of the preceding, the applicant's request is considered to be consistent with the
requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code. It is therefore recommended that the
conditional use permit be granted as requested.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Joe pazandak
Steve Hanson
Todd Knutson
-2-
400
I
~
N
o
400 Feet
I
Lake
Minnetonka
(Smithtown Bay)
rvNETONKA
.l.
.l.
.l.
.l.
BAY
.l.
.l.
.l.
City of Victoria/Carver Co. border
<90
~ '\7 ~\
,,~ ('"' ~ ~
~~ ~~~o
~~~o
1.0 0_
o S'
0__ oS
-^'" /0
'-.)-'fi' ~ Q
- ~ '...r,>V-Q
~~ V~
.
:::
C)
C)
C)'"
C)C)",
.....:~lC)
-Q)lCi
-~Q)
II II II
O:::"J--..J
V1
NN
~N
. 0
O~
00
o
o
\'\
.
,~
,
&
,
O$:~
eta ~.
~
N
0 30 60 90
J~~A A6A" -\-\o~
SCALE IN FEET
<;(.9'
<'0" ~')..~ == EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION.
~ i-q
<'0>0 X(998.0) == PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
''>0 ~ == DIRECTION SURF ACE DRAINAGE
HOUSE TOTAL SQ. FT.
HOUSE NEW' SQ. FT.
= 4742 SF.
= 1400 SF.
GARAGE TOTAL SQ. FT. = 1360 SF.
~ro
~.
\')
LOT AREA == 33060 SF / 0.75 Ac
R.:::-;>S
<:) <1':::-<10~00
::::<\ t. ':::-S 1<1'
- f/L-- ~6;> 0;>"
<:'
~
\\
\')
\
o\:fJ
I\.,.~ EXISTING HOUSE = 3235 SF.
) EXISTING PATIO = 800 SF.
o (FRONT>
EXISTING PATIO = 1135 SF.
(REAR)
EXISTING W'ALK = 150 SF.
<FRONT>
EXISTING DRIVE = 3500 SF.
(FRONT>
= 2968.95 SF.
HARDCOVER CALCS
NEW' HOUSE = 3720 SF.
EXISTING PATIO = 800 SF.
<FRONT>
NEW' PATIO
<REAR)
EXISTING W'ALK = 150 SF.
<FRONT>
NEW' DRIVE
<FRONT>
= 935.65 SF.
R.:::-l.
A 00
<1':::-<1 -00
t..:::-;>!o.s;>,
\..1.<,.3 19',
TOTAL EXISTING = 8820 SF.
<26.7% OF LOT AREA)
w
0:::
-<
0:::
L 0..
0
^ Z
-oQ) w
c > 0
OL W
-J~ W
~~ >
a::
0
ll;S 0
"tJ :J
1.., 0
a ..J
u
~ 0
~ z
>-
!::: ..J
ll;S l..L.
~ 0
..;j-
..;j-
to
I--..
~
eJ
Cl
(.)>-
~~
CJQ:::
~::5
::5lr;
co
0
...
~
!!i @5<
a:~ I-
a. >-0
~Vl
~~Si
~ii\Vl CXl
8 ... ~s:~~ 0
<.:I >ffi< In
< CD
III a. s~.......
VlVlO~ g
Vll-~I-
~U",Vl ci
I-~!a!t! ...
a:
~o81- ...
:t>a:... ....
1-:::;>-0 ....
.....
>a:;5Vl a:
<
l6o.....o~ s:;l
t:Q .,
TOTAL EXISTING = 8574.6 SF
(25.9% OF LOT AREA) Exhibit B
PROPERTY SURVEY
28105 Boulder Bndge Dr.
'l..,
"
"
,
,
,
",
"
""
",
"
~
6
::t.
$
.
.
"',.C
4'"
~
L
:.
~
~
.i-
\.
8
~
~
=
f j
-
~$
Q
~
---- ---- t
--- ----
---- ---
1
..
3-1
. i
;;
-
J
-
I
~
.0',.1
Exhibit CSED FLOOR PLANS
PROPO
.
.
~
~i!
i!:
..5
~
\1
m
l(
~
5
co
6
5
..
l!
co
i
j
~
\1
~
..
l(
!
5
a
rt..___
II
II
II
II
II
I'
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
LL___
!: fi i ~ ~ ~
..
~l e \1 iI \1
1-- ~ E
Ii .. ..
~~I l( l(
! !
t.. Uo 5 5 t-
01 i a
6 E
..... m
;u (J>
-l rt..___ -l
J: II m
m II r
r II m
m II '<
~ II l>
II -l
-l II 2
2 rt..___ __LL___
~
m
~
r
r
/,I~
IW
II
II
1"11
IW
II
II
1"11
II-l
II
II
1"11
II-l
II
II
1"11
II-l
II
II
tJ-----------
~tr.l
t""l:><
~g:
<sr.
>.......
~tJ
~
0
~
00-
I
~
~
~ ~ c..
~ ... ~
...
> ... z
z ~
~ ::>
00-
~
t::;
~
STEVE & DIANNE HANSON
28105 BOULDER BRIDGE DRIVE
SHOREWOODtM~NESOTA
TODD KNUTSON DESIGN
~3e> N. 3RD. ST. SUITE ~3e>
MINNEAFOL IS, MN. ~~4e>1
612 - 332 -8e>e>e>
.
.
SOUTI-I ELEVATION
-7
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I I
c:::::::::::::::::~
G;) EAST ELEvATION
11.... I....
MATC:J.t !)(16TI\D ~
....rew !)(I.TIOG .-
MATCW Ext6TINCi 61DINI:i
.'_0
NEW PQN)4i.TI()N
NEW I'ClOrllG
DATE: '-11-1>2
REVISIONS:
_rED ).12.~
......rED '.12.~
M .....T n-I)..
.. PRINT 0..".
1MU!0l.).e)
Z~-
~rl\~
_U\""t
d)WU\
WI-U\
Q- .~
::JZ",
zd)L~
() . - ~
." I- d) (1)
""1 d) - I
I- ....lC"l
::J . () rl\
Zao...rl\
~~A'
rl\'lC"l
Q . W~
aZZ
()~Z
I-rl\L
U\
z
o
en
z
c(~
:J:ii!
W Q cC
z 8~
Z i enl
:SID
Qa:
w
a.MQ-
WV 58
WOO
> ID E
W 1ft a:
~5!i
tn = en
I JOB NO. 2&1fi I
I SHEET NO.
Exhibit E
ELEVATION -REAR
...
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY SPACE
TO STEVE HANSON
WHEREAS, Steve Hanson (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 28105
Boulder Bridge Drive, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described as;
"Lot 2, Block 3, Boulder Bridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the
construction of additional garage space on the side of the home, the area of which, when added
to the area of existing accessory space on the property, will bring the total area of accessory
space on the property up to 1360 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional use Permit for the
construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated
27 February 2003, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 4 March 2003, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular
meeting on 24 March 2003, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes ofthe
Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City
staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the subject property is located in a P.U.D. Planned Unit Development
(single-family residential) zoning district and contains approximately 33,060 square feet of area.
2. That the total proposed accessory space (1360 square feet) does not exceed the
floor area above grade of the principal structure (6142 square feet).
3. That the total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot
area for the P.U.D. zoning district in which it is located (4000 square feet).
\.
'\oil.,
.:...
.
.
4. That the design and materials of the proposed attached garage are consistent with
the architectural character ofthe existing home.
5. That the proposed attached garage complies with all setback requirements for the
P .D.D. zoning district.
6. That the property is currently nonconforming with respect to hardcover, and that
the applicant proposes to reduce the amount of hardcover from 26.7 percent to 25.9 percent by
eliminating one of the driveway entrances and narrowing the existing driveway.
CONCLUSION
A. That the application of Steve Hanson for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth
herein above be and hereby is granted.
B.
That this approval is subject to the following:
1. That the proposed garage will be used strictly for purposes of a residential
nature.
2. That the Applicant is hereby advised that the City Code provides specific
regulations relative to home occupations and any future use of the garage
for other than allowable residential purposes would have to comply with
such regulations.
3. This approval is subject to the Applicant reducing the total amount of
impervious surface on the property as set forth in the approved plans for
the proj ect.
C. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide the
Applicant with a certified copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder
or Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY SHOREWOOD this 24th day of
March 2003.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
-2-
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
30 January 2003
RE:
Capestone Ponds P.D.D. - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Concept Stage Plan
FILE NO.:
405(03.01)
BACKGROUND
.
Capestone Builders propose to build 12 twinhomes on the property located at 20775
Manor Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). In order to accomplish this
type of development they have requested an amendment to the Shorewood
Comprehensive Plan, changing the land use designation for the property from "Minimum
Density Residential (0-1 units per acre)" to "Medium Density Residential (3-6 units per
acre)". They have also requested concept stage approval for a rezoning from R-IA/S,
Single-Family ResidentiallShoreland to a P.D.D. district.
The property in question is made up of three parcels ofland, one of which is actually
located in Greenwood. In total there are 11.1 acres of land, of which 3.4 acres exist as
wetland. As can be seen on Exhibit B, the terrain on this property changes dramatically.
For example, the elevation of the wetland is approximately 934 while the northeast comer
rises to elevation 1015, a difference of over 80 feet. Much of the site ranges in elevation
between 955 and 970. A steep, cliff-like embankment forms the northeast comer ofthe
site, as illustrated by the heavy shading on the topography map. Exhibit C shows the
distribution of trees on the property, most of which are located around the perimeter of
the property and on the higher ground near Excelsior Boulevard.
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
*ro.E.
Memorandum
Re: Capestone P .U.D.
Comp Plan Amendment and Concept Plan
30 January 2003
The subject site is presently occupied by Carmichael's Auto Salvage. The home of the
current owner is situated in the northwest corner of the site. Four outbuildings associated
with the salvage operation are situated in the center of the site. Much of the surrounding
development is shown on Exhibit C.
As mentioned above, the subject property is currently zoned R-IA/S, Single-Family
ResidentiallShoreland. Land uses and zoning surrounding the site are as follows:
.
South:
East:
single-family residential; zoned R-IA/S
single-family residential and two-family residential; zoned R-IA/S and
R-2A/S, Single and Two-Family Residential, respectively
Excelsior Boulevard and State Highway 7
single-family residential (in Greenwood)
North:
East:
The developer proposes to build 12 twinhomes (24 units) on the property, leaving the
existing single-family home in the northwest corner of the site (see Exhibit D). Access to
the development would come from ExcelsiorBoulevard. It is proposed that the road
would be privately owned and maintained by a homeowner's association. A pond is
proposed near Manor Road to address site drainage. Given the acreage of the site, it is
assumed that the pond would be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
standards. The twinhome units shown on the plan are intended to be conceptual, but are
patterned after the new twinhomes under construction on County Road 19. The
developer further explains the project in Exhibit E.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
.
The development as proposed requires two actions by the City: 1) an amendment to the
Shorewood Comprehensive Plan; and 2) rezoning.
A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Before the issue of zoning can be addressed,
the City must consider its Comprehensive Plan. Shorewood's Proposed Land Use
Plan designates the subject property as "Minimum Derisity Residential (0-1 units
per acre)". It also highlights the property as an "area of further study". The
developer requests that this designation be amended to "Medium Density
Residential (3-6 units per acre)" to accommodate the proposed development.
Staffhas calculated the density of the project as 3.2 units per acre. This is based
upon the net area ofthe site after wetland and road areas are subtracted. It should
be explained that the density is based upon a 40,000 square-foot unit (sometimes
referred to as the "Shorewood acre"). Consequently, the land use designation
need only be changed to "Low to Medium Density Residential (2-3 units per
acre)" for this project.
-2-
Memorandum
Re: Capestone P.U.D.
Comp Plan Amendment and Concept Plan
30 January 2003
.
B.
.
It is worth noting that the subject site was originally designated for higher density
in an earlier edition of the Comprehensive Plan. The intent was to provide
additional areas for a variety of housing choices, with higher densities near major
roadways. More importantly, it was intended to create an incentive for the
redevelopment of a very nonconforming and potentially environmentally
problematic site. The Planning Commission took this into consideration when it
designated the site as an area of further study.
In making a determination as to the acceptability of the proposed amendment, it is
recommended that the Planning Commission and City Council review the goals
and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Natural
Resource and Land Use sections.
Undoubtedly, one of the key questions relative to any redevelopment of this site
is its environmental condition. Although the present owner has worked with the
Pollution Control Agency over the years, it is expected that the historic use ofthe
land has resulted in some contamination. The developer's engineer informs us
that a Phase I environmental study has been completed and that a Phase II study
is nearing completion. Preliminary soil testing indicates the presence of some
soil contamination. As of this writing no environmental reports have been
received. Needless to say, any redevelopment of this property will have to adhere
to MnPCA recommendations and requirements.
Rezoning. If the Comprehensive Plan amendment proves successful, there are
two ways the property could be zoned to implement the amendment. First, the
land could simply be rezoned to the R-2A/S, Single and Two-Family Residential
district. This would have to be followed by a conditional use process for planned
unit development. The P.U.D. provisions of the Shorewood Code contain the
legal mechanics for such things as zero lot line development and ownership and
maintenance of the private road and common areas. This could be viewed as a
logical extension ofthe R-2A zoning that already exists to the east ofthe subject
site. Alternatively, and recommended, is to establish a P.D.D. district. The
advantage of this approach is that if the project as approved would fall through,
the zoning of the property reverts back to its current R-IA/S zoning. The
standards established in a development agreement would serve as the zoning
requirements for the proj ect. It is recommended that the development agreement
would reflect R-2A requirements for building height, building setbacks, etc.
If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning are favorably considered,
the following should be taken into consideration in the review of the proposed
Concept Plan (Exhibit D).
-3-
Memorandum
Re: Capestone P.D.D.
Comp Plan Amendment and Concept Plan
30 January 2003
.
.
1. The plan provides for a 35-foot wetland buffer and IS-foot setback from
the buffer, consistent with Shorewood's wetland protection requirements.
It is recommended that future reforestation and landscape plans for the
project provide for protection and restoration of wetland vegetation,
particularly on the developed side of the wetland.
2.
The rear yard setback at the perimeter ofthe site is shown as 30 feet. The
Zoning Code provides that this setback should reflect the zoning
requirement of adjoining properties. As a result, the setback adjacent to
the south 265 feet of the easterly lot line (abutting the R-2A district)
should be 40 feet. The setback for the rest of the property should be 50
feet, reflective ofR-IA standards. While this will require some
modification of either the building design for units 23/24 or possibly the
site plan. The remainder of the site easily accommodates the suggested
50-foot requirement. Assuming that the existing home would have its
own lot, its setback from the north property line would be 10 feet. It is
worth mentioning that considerable separation will exist between the
proposed development and existing homes, by virtue of topography,
distance and vegetation.
3. Buildings must be set back at least 20 feet from the proposed road.
4.
The traffic projections included on Exhibit E-2 are considered light.
Residential units of this type are typically calculated at 5-8 trips per day.
Single- family residential generates 8-10 trips per day. The result from
this development would be a range of 128 - 202 trips per day. If the
developer's anticipated market of singles and empty nesters is accurate,
the lower end ofthe range might be anticipated.
5. Staff from the City of Greenwood has expressed concerns about
additional traffic at the intersection of Manor Road, St. Alban's Bay
Road, and Suburban Drive (a.k.a. five corners). It is anticipated that the
majority of traffic from this site will use Excelsior Boulevard. Also, only
the single-family home will access directly onto Manor Road.
6. The design of the private road should be subject to review and approval
by the City Engineer and the local Fire Marshal.
7. In addition to the two parking spaces required for each unit, the developer
has provide additional guest parking areas in strategic locations.
8. Although not indicated in the narrative, it is expected that the twinhomes
would be subdivided for individual ownership.
-4-
Memorandum
Re: Capestone P.U.D.
. Comp Plan Amendment and Concept Plan
30 January 2003
9. Most ofthe Greenwood parcel ofland is in the wetland area. A protective
covenant should be required to ensure that this parcel remains
undeveloped and legally tied to the rest of the project.
10.
The developer has expressed an interest in extending municipal water to
the project. If the increased density is to be approved, this should be a
requirement. It is important to realize that such an extension would
provide a very valuable piece of the connection between the Amesbury
and Southeast Area water systems. The City Council has agreed that such
opportunities should be taken to increase the number of users on the
system.
.
11.
The City Engineer will address under separate cover the capacity of the
existing sanitary sewer system relative to this project.
RECOMMENDATION
Although it is assumed that any environmental issues associated with this site can be
overcome, it would be useful to know more about the extent of the contamination and the
alternatives for mitigation. While the Planning Commission could condition its decision
on satisfactory resolution of the environmental concerns, it would be useful to have the
information sooner than later. In this regard, the Commission may wish to continue the
discussion, pending receipt ofthe environmental studies. Nevertheless, the project
appears to have some merit in terms of the redevelopment of a very nonconforming use
of the property.
.
Once a concept plan has been agreed upon, the developer must submit development stage
plans. This is where details such as grading, drainage, utilities and landscaping are
presented. Also, more information is provided relative to the design and construction of
the actual buildings.
Ultimately, final plans for the project are incorporated into a development agreement and
declaration of protective, covenants.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Brian Harju
Roger Anderson
-5-
,\,.
,\,.
Lake Minnetonka
(St. Alban's Bay)
.
~o 7
Christmas Lake
400
I
o
400 Feet
I
~
N
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Capestone P .D.D.
."44A ~~~
:'V,L ~~ ~
L'I/~r./ 'J>'. ~~'~0 ...
I": (/~" aA ,,=.=-~~W -............,..~
~;/\ . . ~,~~. .
.l~t~ ~ ~~':
','7 V ~~ ~
N~ ~E ~~p--- ~ ~ ~ ..... .
J IUfi 1 -;.. ~.C/~_~ ~1h ic:JJI)x;
'I/v J>~.-'?J~ ...-:::: ~ I ~W ILL In 'f/1.
I '<'.r '/r- ~ ~x. ,p. _ '1IJ
J r r:-)~"'~"'''''' >' k~ !. i.A'J
-- "
" '~q
~
= I __ . "''''
~. .f J Iti.
"
- ~ .
~" .... . .' I!
~ ~. "'19.~; ~. . \.' ~~~~~ ~_..." rY/J...:;/lIx'rr\ J
~\ -,-,J& 0/?1 II . . 'Gl.C X.\ \~.., \\\ I '\ .
... - ~~.~ ~~')I 1//" v ( U. r-) ..'
lit .~. ~~J'~\ L ')~-. _
1Irra\~ W. ~ ~j-- ,-
~,~ ~n .'- -- .~ I' ,. . '/'/~;;?o- .
IIiif5" .'-'"
. "-/_~ l\ \I.w ,,:;..:.. ~ h
/~'/ . S "'" "" I I
· ~, .. -~~;i;~~k ~')" ~ ~~" '. 0..
\ \ · 0 c 30;;7- /'~~""~'(i~,a-:,/..-' 0-; II.. . "-
.\\ ~ ,~. ' -:::cr .. r;f4~~g~~~~~--::..~/- /. r. ~~ t tt! -" 0 0 a
1"- I, _\ -- ':'::.,1 - .j / / \__"''''''';'~ ~ W~ ~ ~
~ \ ~ -- ~ ~.I, ---~~~, ." 1,~/2~
r ~~ "" -' .... ... ", \ \ \.' ' Z /
I ,~ .~ ~ II '{\",>.' ' ~ ~ ::; ,;,..- ~
r " O~ . ."\ \,\ \ ~'- ~_, ~ Z;t\,<~
.. \1, '/. ~ "'= .,,0~,..
\, ~..I~ .. ""'" "" ,,~/ '~~I"";~ ~
J.tr'.Ai --- .. ~ ~ J 'I fro ", :r.<,"_ "" .. < ,_
1., r- '~22~ "I ~- /J 2}\~ <;//"-1" :c;' ~ ~ ... _ .;l~ ~~ ~ ~~
~. / '11/1 "'4 ~'~0
IX" )~~ ) ~~~~ _; ~~'\~
~~. / ~. . ~~~~ ~ a\ ~ IV /.Y.. ~~'--~i~~
....... " II . ~////4c'::~ I ~ )~cA~_ \:~
' . -"!:/....-/.-y~;:-/;&*~ :J. \.~ .....~~ ~ ~~
~'%-~"". r~.. ~ '-:'~
iJ . ~~~bf '?~""~ ) /}/] r\ //'- / ~ ~ ,~-x.", \. \~ ~
l ~" '!'t~ ,~ "( ~ '"'-,.I L .;~ ~~ ~/ - ~~, . I: \" 'i~ \'\
''':/ (1/ ~ Jl~ ~~ tJPi:f\~ \f' _//1 '~~
_~J iI;' if<> ~~~~: - ~ ~~ \ \.~IO '1', "ll~:
mY ~ ~ J {~"r~r-.- ~ I\~~ ~k\\ ~
\ '& ~\ "-\ '111.'1. >'~ ~ l .~ r-- _' (.,~ ,\ "
~ \ ~\ J j '( I ~ A~r T ) ~ , 1...1\ ~~
\ I I I.. ////~. /' ~ . :~,.. ....-A- ''\ ',- ,_
\. I I \~ ril " ~,' I :.:.....J. ~) ) \~
J \ \ '" . /a~ ~'f' f r i~ 1 :;-, ~~_ .~.....
(. '" ~ VV J /1 V"" .f~= !
Q' \ Ii ' .xml1l.of i} J I:y ": _ ~ ey .. -- 1
r)\ . ~ ~ 'I ~ \ [~ '. '\' If::. ----:b. :: ~; ~ ,--- ~~ fNJi. 1 r ..c.. ~
~il//I a. ~...~ . ...L.?:- "",. '" . . .~:t!M ~ /----;
I ~ \ \II a ~. "'''''' ....~:? ~ ~~ ,:; 0 !~~.'~.~
oJ: '\ "-'\. 1\ ..' .' r ~E!1 ',' -,'..~-';t : ~
<. ~, J ~ .' .. I -ll.. ....... _ .
'. ~ .. "'''s...."" ~\'- ..:. ~'~ ~ z --==.' .I
. ~ ~ 4"'--.,... I' .....,
~..;:s - -', < _. ~.f 0 ~
\ ..' lo{" . . . ,/ ~...... ~
~ '" .. L~'- . I....., ~ AJ
.! ~ ~~~~~=- ~~.. -.~ ~ ':r!. ~~ ' ..
' .~ - ~ iH / . . &'l/""",
-' ") 7 loJ' ..&1'-./-" , . ~~::;::::
" . ~"" . ~""
"-~~~~...~ '" 1~cf(~/7////
\ ~
'/,~{ I .
r
R ..
~) .
-
I', k
~
(')1> z tr.I
.g'z ~ e-:
ot:1Glcr'
~~=~.
80tdtJj
o~o
'"Co~
CGl=
b~o
" >0
~t:1
=00
t<tr-j
~
~
~
Z
IGl
.J
1\
~\
~
I
\ ~
~
[\
:\
v.
-
,
1(1
..
..
+
+
~
. ," ,;,. ~
'/N /J;
. If/'
..
tJx
Ib
-+
.-
~
.,
t)....
..
..
.....11
.
..
.
..
.
I
C
..
... ~
~
I
,
~
..4~ " ~,
-.: ~
\
\
,
,
~
,
\
"@)
--v~,
~~/~
~~.
~(-
..--a.
'0 _
o
e~
o
()
-
,
,
..~
()
'..
/...
.
~~~(\,-~J)
G)
(', lr)
\,)
~-
C)
-oJ
~-
-..
<-
LJ
:~
.~
.
,...1 T
o
s
<:: J
,,~ V
~
" I
\
\~
V
'J
'i^
T i' 8
........
\, .I o.
.--.... \
....
\
s
~,
o
;(
\
,
\
SOU1H UN[ OF '!HE SOU1H'/lEST ClIIARlER OF '!HE---~, ..
SOU1HYoEST ClIINllER OF SEC1lON 251tlWHSHlP 117 '~ ./
NDR'IH. RANGf: 23 '/lEST. ".--' , .. _ __,
, / / ,
",..,~
/'
--_...::.
--..:.=::::=--::0. ___~
III..~~ 1"'\" ~A 0 T' C- 0
"
,
/
,/
,
,-
..c
('0
C/)
-..
<-
..c
('0
-J
..c
~..:
II)
c..
. ""
,/
... '
'0 ('
"
\ '
" 0
" "
'"
-r
.,. P. \
C S \
.... .,.
\ ,
~ '.
~ 0 \J
('
1
bJ'~
.",
/., I'
... / ---
'/~l (
~\ ". '
NORTH
c S
....
"
o "
CERTlF1CAT
I hereby c<
and that I
Doted th is
Revised thi
NOTES:
, The arie
the Saut
1-4 minu
ie ore,
3. No title
or the I
4. Tapogral
5, Existing
from ex
Other U'
011 utiliti
utilities
6. The tre,
trained
determir
occuratl
Exhibit C
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Capestone P.D.D.
/
I
.,
\
\~
.
,....'
~
\
.
.
, --"
. . .......
I
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
"-
"
"
'-..
---.
'\
"'-
.........
.....
"-
.....
.....
"
\
'"
'"
"
"
"
WETLAND
~
11;&1.7
S 89'57'32" E
525.69
CONCEPT DATA
II. _. . ~ . . _ . . _.. .-..- ..
"-"-"-",
- PROPOSED CHANGE FROM R1-A TO PUD.
30' SElBACK
- 12 TWIN HOMES
- 1 SINGLE FAMILY HOME
- 25 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS
l')
o
oi
OJ
l')
- TOTAL SITE AREA: 483,775 sf (11.1 AC); 100%
- AREA FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENllAL: 4,483 sf (.6 I
- AREA FOR TWIN HOME RESIDENTIAL: 197,626 sf (4.5 A(
- AREA FOR STREETS: 24,998 sf (.57 AC); 5%
- AREA FOR WETLAND: 146,822 sf (3.4 AC); 30%
- AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 89,846 sf (2.1 AC); 19%
~ SE1BACK
:=
.
OJ
.~
b
o
VI ~
APPLICANT
15' SETBACK
.,-'"
",
-- ",',
"" . a.
- . \
"\ \.
\ II..
\ \\
\ \
\ .
\ \ ~
\ .
\ '.
) .i ~
/ i i
\ (t.~
",.,.
CAPESTONE BUILDERS
4109 ECKERT AVE SE
DELANO, MN 55328
. ('B~IAN HA~JU: ~52-972-5ggg)
16.50
S 89'55'37" W
I()
(0
ui
OJ
....
:=
.
OJ
..-
;..
:or
o
o
(f)
/~
.....
'-
"-
.....
.....
.....-
---
---
I
I
~
'. 509.2.~~1E t\1Gl'lYl~"" NO.7
'. _Yl~'1 UNE Of
'. 1t\ RIGlo\'l"-Of
...-NOR
,.... ,.. ^ Tt='
HIGHWA Y
NO, 7
NORTH
Exhibit D
CONCEPT PLAN
Capestone P.D.D.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning of
20775 Manor Road
Supportine: Information
The Applicant is proposing a comprehensive plan amendment for the existing parcel of
land located at the northeast comer of Excelsior Blvd and Manor Road. This site is
currently operating as an auto salvage yard by Mr. Bruce Carmichiel. This use has been
grandfathered into existence on the R-IA zoned property.
.
Current zoning is at the R-IA level. Previous history relating to the zoning showed that
during the last zoning change the site was guided for higher density development. This
zoning was created as an incentive to bring the non-conforming use property into a
conforming use. Recent guide plan amendments brought the zoning back to the R-IA
status it is today.
The comprehensive plan change would be a direct approach to cleaning up and handling
the environmental issues associated with the auto salvage yard. The site is currently
undergoing a Phase 1 and 2 environmental assessments. Any harmful products found on-
site or underground will be mitigated per MPCA guidelines.
Making the shift to higher density will put the land into a greater tax base for the City.
Specific proximity to current duplex units and Highway 7 makes the site very amenable
for twin-home use. This type of housing expansion in the city gives future residence a
viable choice in housing.
.
The applicant has reviewed the concept plan with the adjacent residents. There was a
favorable reaction from all of the parties.
Applicant, Consultant and Site Data
Applicant:
Capestone Builders
c/o Brian Harju
4109 Eckert Ave SE
Delano MN 55328
763.972.5999 ph
763.972.5890 fax
Exhibit E-l
APPLICANT'S PROJECT NARRATIVE
Capestone P .D.D.
Owner:
Bruce Cannichiel
20775 ManorRd
Shorewood MN 55331
952.474.0871ph
Professional Consultants:
.
Anderson Engineering ofMN, LLC
Roger Anderson, P.E.
Mike Brandvold, P .E.
Jack BoIke, L.S.
13400 15th Ave N
Plymouth MN 55441
763.383.1084 ph
763.383.1089 fax
Land Title
Jeff Christian
Suite 200
1900 Silver Lake Rd
New Brighton MN 55112
651.638.1900 ph
651.638.1994 fax
Site Control:
.
See attached purchase agreement
Title confirmation to follow
Traffic Comparison:
Current use of the property is for commercial auto parts sales. Existing traffic
flows from Excelsior Boulevard north to the Manor Road entrance of the facility.
The estimated traffic count is approximately 25 vehicles per day. This includes
customers and minor delivery vehicles and tow trucks.
Proposed traffic patterns would shift to exclusive use of the Excelsior Boulevard
frontage road with access north into the site. The proposed traffic would be of
homeowner vehicle nature with weekly refuse pickup. Estimates for proposed
traffic volumes would be in the range of 50-60 vehicles per day.
E-2
Site Data:
Number of estimated units:
Area of Residential use:
Area of open space:
Area of Wetlands:
Area of Streets:
24 (12 twin homes)
5.0 Acres
4.5 Acres
3.4 Acres
0.6 Acres
Zoning Classification Change:
Change from R-IA to PUD
Proposed Wording of Comprehensive Plan Text:
.
"Subject area shall be guided for medium density development with PUD zoning
status. "
Effects on streets, utilities, and parks:
The change will allow the construction of an access into the site off Excelsior
Boulevard. This development will be at the expense of the applicant. The current
commercial use entrance off Manor Road will be closed. Utility construction will
connect the proposed homes to the existing sanitary sewer along Excelsior
Boulevard. Watermain corm.Jctions and/or private wells are being reviewed at
this time. Parkland dedication fees will be paid in lieu of land. A mix of
age/family ranges is expected. Single adults and semi-retired owners are expected
in the housing development.
.
E-3
~ "Q I~/~
I '~p ,8(Va,
l"'''----'_'''_h-Lri-"_,,.r ..l ,.... + ~-- -"-"~11
' fj~"l ~~ '" I.... ~~ l "~-~: .._-- "\( -=..~) " ".
I il/ ~~~- i(. ",......\l11lll \ J I D ·
I /i~~ $t~~.... i2! IT .~ ~~' ,!
/l-Y }LAKE ~". -4~1J~h0 II ~ I
i!l"':J'7. . ~ ~ ," -J~ ~.~. (~.#I' I I
jI FER ~. ~ If ~ WAY . ~IL f LA, E3 t{ : F I ~
IE -:-r--- Ii:..:~, : :I'Y' aJ,d~rnrn~ l' ·
~ ". '.:~::~' .;~~:..~.-"'~':- . ' : ~dto....( I ;. ~ --~J ill ~ :, I
1T\\ · "',' ":'iii;/wi\, ,,' ' · " ,DEEPHAVEN I" ;1
lLJ) n... , - ,,;:... ~. · ,... \",\
~ 15 ~.1? ~:: -" ". ...-.::- fJ ~~~I~1!lfq LJ ' it · ~
~ J MINtlt - J.' ~~~ .. {y ~ ~j JNEI I :2
[J" - -:... ~.: :....:~.....;; ~ 'ITf9Ir --- ~ I liE 15 ST_' " ,,, -- ..- '-",'"
/.... ..~ ~{ .- w'" '
..~/~~~~ ..'~'~~ _~, I hr: I ~ I L
. d... m>t " " Y'~, "H f" / L------'1
........... ..~.."'-- .' c"'3t- ............\ '.~~. -~...J- ~ II! I' :2~~ /
--.. ..-'--' -. ~N.' ^~.... 'I....~
-" --.. -'-'>::':"" '~ ~~ ""'" I 1 1~\ r~ jjjIII .,J--- ~'.-!'"A' -I...r ~
'\"'~ . ". ~"" ~~.....~...~ ~ II .lI.Ll ~',I VAl
" . --- , .~ ....-:;...
\ ~(( '\.~' , R 2A ", Ill! . ~/-
(ST. ALBANS BAY).: '~, ~\.~~ ,-------1'--.. ",-+,<; "'y II~ ~. 1 ..... ~~.~ ,- ~1
GO ,~\l ~ ~'RA~ ~V-~ . ~ ~~ I
f'" '~-V-'~/ rrn~
_~C~ \ GREENWOO: ',' .\ ,. Y I c.: ~~,
'\'. ~'d~/'~ .-::;::' 'Pl" '""15:-----\ -]~ ~~ A f ' t/ n. Iv
~ "J F!UJt~ ~ ~ '. 1tt.." 0 ~\ f': .
~ . . ' ~ ~ U' 1 r~- .._- ~ r---. , '
", " ".' ~. ,0 H - .. Q KI
?;'~. ...--/< ' /.~!IlII1I \3 ~,. .,'/ I--=:J ~ ,~~ ~ ~ L--
: " /"' rI -- ~OtsSlll' ~ - '., ,~:.-< \ ~I.~c;$- ./ r -\ ,-e.. ,- ......
r ,""" !&r...r ~!l' ~ 6. ~ -\ ~.~ . V
i ~~?~~ ~~'\"f:'/'~I... ,-- F!U D~ ....,. \~1:--' ~ \\ I~~, IlIA
'f" - .~ , ~/ II --< ~ .: . .. ""~ \\ > 0\ .1 j) II .,~ ~
-V- ~ JE ~ ~~... . \. ~c- HARrw" K~rr · r'F
. 11 L ~ \ ~ ~": . / '( :ll!i~-' ~~:~t h'\'t::
11 I~ B-.!J) !..i ~~"......,:.. ' )1. of it.. ~~ 'R~ ~ ~~~~
r JI/(" \\ 1// \ ~ \ \, - 'I, ~\..... ~ ~.."\ ~ -::::7" ~ riI
r-" \ '. /' \ ~ ' , .: /,{ / I i ~ L -II- I ~
f,; '--', '-~ ,~' / i ' '- .'i... """1/---11 co
~' ~ It-.._.._.._--~..~~~,,_.._.._''_'' <'= -4 :il .._.~V".. 1)_,00" C~ ."
M'I ;' ,I /~-.~ ~ /I F ;1~.L
- . 3 "\..,-/'~ IH/Isr,~MAS LAKE .7!]/:~. fj' t::0- ,~~
~:-'- I Ii',; 0 / I-...: {/,st'VCR iJJ L~~ '" ~ill... - ~
.-\ ,il-.... ~ '/ LAKE /1/1 ::i (..::::X:lfL ;( !'<:::AV) -,...
-, L-~ I \" I' /l ,.../N-I=-~ ~
In. ~~ ., ,,: rt.lT ~. ExhibitF
, ~. iii "._-;-""'r ' <$i"/ /i//.-. 1 J EXISTING ZONING
/; ,........ - "n! :.....~\ I ........., . '.. \'u\ ~I)j-
~ iM \ l-j ,___/~ ~\ it , / ))."/N27\~
-
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
..
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ,li1 ./
Y'1
January 30, 2003
FROM:
.
DATE:
RE: Capestone Ponds - Comp Plan Amendment and PUD Rezoning
Background
This 11.1 acre site is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Manor Road and
Excelsior Boulevard. Exhibit A is a location map for the property.
.
The site presently exists as an auto salvage yard, and a single-family residential lot. The site has
dramatic relief, with a high point of 1017 at the very northeast comer of the parcel, and a low point of
elevation 935 at the southwest comer of the property. The site has mature vegetation scattered
throughout.
The applicant, Mr. Bruce Carmichiel is proposing construction of 12 twin home units with a private
roadway and cul-de-sac.
Right of Way, Roadway, and Easements
The applicant's engineer has indicated that the roadway that is proposed will be a private roadway 24
feet in width. The single entrance is to be located 650 feet east of the existing intersection of Excelsior
Boulevard and Manor Road.
Since the roadway is a private roadway, right of way will not be required for the site. However, utility
easements will be required for any public utilities installed within the site.
n
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Capestone Ponds
Comp Plan Amendment and PUD
January 30, 2003
Page 2 of4
Municipal Water and Sanitary Sewer
The closest feasible connection to municipal water service is located near St. Alban's Bay Circle
within the Seasons Subdivision. This point is approximately 1850 feet to the east of the proposed
subdivision.
.
During previous examinations of the water systems within the City of Shorewood, it has been
determined that interconnection of the Amesbury water system with the Southeast water system is a
positive goal to strive for. Previous scenarios have included the extension of watermain from the SE
area well system, through Manor Road to the Amesbury system.
The Amesbury water system is what is known as a hydro-pneumatic water system. In a nutshell, this is
a large community well with a small reservoir system. According the Minnesota Department of
Health (MDH) a hydro-pneumatic system is designed to serve a maximum of 25 service connections.
Currently, the Amesbury system is overtaxed with approximately 175 connections. StafIhas identified
the need to interconnect the Amesbury system with the SE Area system. Connections of these systems
will solve several operation issues for both systems.
.
With regard to this proposal, Staff has asked the developer to consider the extension of municipal
water from Spring Circle, to the proposed subdivision. Since this would involve the installation of
approximately 1800 feet ofwatermain outside the development, a credit (to be determined at a future
date) could be provided to the developer. The development benefits by obtaining municipal water
service and the City benefits by the construction of a key extension to the system. Specifics to the
financial aspects of such an extension will have to be worked out with the developer as part of the
development agreement.
Sanitary sewer service is available to the site via an existing sanitary sewer main located within the
right of way for Excelsior Boulevard. There is an additional sewer main on Manor Road that is owned
and maintained by the Metropolitan Council.
Grading Drainage and Erosion Control
This site is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and City of Shorewood
subwatershed SAB3. Runoff from this area flows under Manor Road via a 12 inch diameter culvert
and ultimately to St. Alban's Bay. Exhibit B is an excerpt from the City of Shorewood Stormwater
Management Plan (SMP) indicating the general direction of flow.
The 100 year high water level for the subwatershed is elevation 938. In accordance with the City's
S:MP the lowest allowable floor elevation is 1.0 foot above the 100-year elevation or 4.0 feet above any
known groundwater conditions. Exhibit C is the policy excerpt as it relates to lowest floor elevations.
00
~
-.
tn
'"'
(1)
o
o
3
3
(1)
l;j
Q..
5'
0Cl
~
"0
'"'
o
<
I>>
-
o
....,
.....
~
(1)
o
o
l;j
o
(1)
~
"0
i
o
o
a
~.
(1)
a
c:
"0
o
l;j
g.
(1)
~
-
5"
~
-.
l;j
0Cl
o
o
l;j
e:
.....
cr
l;j
~
~
n
C>
a
a
ftl
=
g.
~
.....
....
C>
=
en
..
"Os>>t-i
'"'tn~
~ ~.(1)
O':.....Q..
(1) _.(1)
Q..='<
.....(1)
~::r5"
0(1)'&
8 Q.. '"'
$a.-
"O(1)p)
cr::! tn
en ::s .- .
-.l;j
Ol;jo.
...., s>> .....
..... i:t.o
~O~
f: l;j (1)
(1)00.
@....,g.
"0 ~ ~
00"'d
::lc:~
tn l;j l>>
I>> Q.. tn
tn ~ (1)
'g ~ 0
'"' (1) ='
..... '"' (1)
s,~~
g.o.o.
(1)tn"'d
"0 8. if
@ - tn
~8(1)
2.l;j ~
l;j e: 0
~ p-. (1)
g ~
"0 tn -.
-. '"'
I>> 0
l;j l;j
'"' l:;4 3
(1) -'(1)
=:l.tn ::s
(1) '"' .....
~(1)e.
rn 8 rn
. 3 a-
3 e:
(1) (1)
l;j tn
o.~
(1) .....
0. -
-
g.0"
s>> (1)
....."0
g.(1)
(1)~
n'"
.....3
......(1)
'<0.
er ....
(1) 0
"Eta~~
o S'o s>>
=:l.-'~ a
o.a='s>>
(1)... _
(I) ~ I>> tn
s>> P 5" 0
a - l;j -.
s>> ? 0Cl 5
Er t;n .... 2"
.....O~Q..
(1) 0 (1) ....
l;j..... '"
I>> tn l;j s>>
l;j(1)0~
o "0 ::l
(1)~~
~a ~.
(1) -. 0.
_0(1)"0
...., l;j 0
~ l:P S, l;j
0.0......0.
~3~5"
P (1) 0
~ ff.a ~
..... tn (1)
l;j~::to.
o I>> (1) 0
....,-e?l;j
(I)-::;....
s>>..... ~
t:t)Otn(1)
~ g..g 5
s>> (1) (1) ::l
s.~s,~
(1)!....(1)
'"' 0 ~ ~
$a. ...., (1) .c
~. .... "0 c:
~~Ol>>
~. (1) l;j 0.
l;j Q.. '"'
0Cl Q... I>>
~ 0 a
eo~~s,
~{I)~......
::t -. ~
(1) 3 (1)
I>> -. "0
~ l;j '"'
P s>> 0
tn~"O
5""O~
"0 _ '<
(1) ~ .
Otn......
""'{I)l"""
g. ~ '"'
(1)g~
'l:j -~.
o 0. e.
l;j -.l;j
0.l;j(JQ
. 0
2"~
......1 0. I>>
r-:J(1)-
e: ::
(I) I>> (I)
.
I>> {l)g.,",s>>ot-i
[g.(1)~g.ggo
;:;" 0. ~ ~..c (I)
'< :;::. <:; e. r;:: ::: i>>
.... ,.;I. l>> l;j a s::::l rn
o ~...... (JQ (1) ~ ....
o (1) (1) 0
~ l;j ~ ~ 8'"' Q.. g
-. ~ '"' - 0" 0
aoo.;;-300
l>> -. ()3 ~
_.(I) rn l;j.... ~
l;j~g. o@",
~90.g.",....0
::;: <; ..... -. 0 ~ oq
,.. -. < (I) 0 0 ~
'l:j l;j ~. '"' 0 Q..
'"' oq _. 0 l;j c: _.
OtnO(JQtn~l;j
"0 -. l;j 0..... ~. (JCl
o~ l;j2(1)....
~rn8~~~go
Q..oal>>......o'"'
rt ....,.... :;: sr -. 0
s::::l !:1:1 2 '" ,.. l;j ....
n ~. 0 l>> ~ 'l:j ~.
;;+-.... <;-~
c: c: 0 ~ I>> s>> ~.
@~O'~Fg~
r/.l S' o' (') u ~
o~ 0_0s>>
~ :::r e. _~ l;j -
... 0 ... -. -.... 0 -
'"' 0 ~ 0.....
g.~ - ~ ~ (I)
o"O~o::=.:ii~
- -... ...., (I) -.
o -. '" l>>" c:....
l;j 0 "0 ~
(JCl ~ ~ "0 Q.. e. -
_..... vo'"'Plliio
..... .. en ..... :::s
~ (I). ?:S. l;j ~ (JCl
~g 3~Oct
(f9. s= ~ 0 8 ::!
l;j 0 ~ I>> l;j ~
g ~'< i5.~ a
'"'0- 21>>
1'12 ...., Ut l:P -.
g-........oS4.a
c:~o~g.o
_(1)1-..) v ~
Q.. '"' 0 8 .... l;j
er ~ '< l;j go g
o~~o.,",.
....J:; -'0
2: e. ~ g. 0. ~
o ~ l;j 0
...... ......1'12 0 .
o~l""" (I)_
<; 0Cl e: l;j 0
0.e.0 S4,0 so
~r;)oa""o
0.cQ..(Q~~
~ ~. ~ e. "g eo
.....~I>>...s>>-
f;l ;;;.3 a lot 0
~l;j'E.3S~
....g.(Q0
if Ui' ~. ~ g" g"
r;::~;i
12 0
(Q g. r;::
a@~
tn '"'
o 0 ~
~l;jd
oSOer
~ 0 I>>
l>> l;j -.
-ol;j
.r-::l~
e: ~ 0
(I) ~.~
0.0.0
(Q (Q l>>
~'O I>>
oq ...., t:T'
l;j .... 0
~ go ~
o ......
r;::8~
5:1>>0
er Q.. '"'
o ~ ~
~~ ~.
,",' ~.
3 s::~
eo til ~
- -. e.
~cr-
~1>>8
(1) tn 3
::s'<'t:J
tt~~
o 0
~ a ~
0.0(1)
l;j I>> tn
g::sso
.... er 0
~0"O
o 0. 0
-(Q....
~ rn 0
oq .....::s
o 0Cl ::to
~e.
~o.o.
0....'"'
a. 0 ~.
(I) _.='
S'-a~
a ~ 0
~ .H gj'
(Q~ c:
o 0
;:I. er (I)
::t.~.~
o ... '"'
eo'"
.~S'-
(1) (Q
.
0" -..... ...... t-i
(1) ::s 0 r::f 0 ::r
~~~gao
g 0 e: g. e. ~
l;j "0 0 (Q a 0
....o<p.eg
~ ra. ~ 0- l;j' Q..
o _.
r;::<(')lii"08
::s (Q _.. v 0 ='
;:;" 0. ~ u ra. 0
(I) '"' ~ j.... (Q
g s' ~ ~ Ci 3
~ I>> -.;;;r 0. ~.
;;;r (JCl 0 '"'
o ~ '< g. e. so
l;j c::~. 0 l;j 0
o l;j ..... a~ 'l:j
aQ..0008
... 0 1'12 X
1'12 '"' a (Q l:P_.
-. "0 0 ~
Q.. .....e: e. '"' ~ P
o .::SoP;:;"
01'l2S":.t!......'<
...., .... _. 1-:. ::r 0
....'< l;j 30....,
~ 'l:j -. '"'
o(1)l>>....oSO
'"' 0 I-..) '<0 s>> 0
o ....,. 101
I>> "0 0 ....,,< ~
~ '"' "0 e. ~ eo
<;O(Q........-
l>> "0 '"' 0 .-....
~~g~~o
r;:: e. a. e. (Q so
l;j v .r- I>> 0
- 00 ::t 0 '"'
o .... t::. "0 ...., 0
1'12 l;j 0 s>>
1'12 ~ _. 1'12 I>> lot
I>> o-t) S ;:;.' - '<
I-..) ~ c: <' g s>>
. o~(QV '"'
or;::P,",C:o.
"0 - - 0 l;j l>>
o Q.. 0 s>> -::s
a'"'~Iotf:o.
o 0 ....'< 1'12 1'12
a.g e aso:a
0Cl S' e: 0 0
'"' '" l;j Po no ::t
S. -. s>> '"' "1-t l:1
o l;j - e. l>> 0
O e:0Cl e e: ~
< '"' .... l;j
l>> _. I>> 0Cl 0Cl ~
::s PoPoo ....
_ c: (Q ~ "0 -.
.....1>> <;_1'12
(1) _ ~ _. I>> I>>
~ tI2 ::;.-:::= t:S ......
g.....o ::r er -. ~
... _. 1'12."
(D'::! l;j (Q ~
<~o:j-<~1'I2
(Q ~ ~.~ ~.l>>
po l>> ~ '< (JCl 0
.....S>>p.l;j~
~ lot -. g. e.
_O!'"b _
ol>>Pl~o
I>> 1'12 0 ;::l ::s
Po .... s:: ..... (JCl
1'12 0 ::;'::r (Q
~p...,.:j
(1)0:::r
~ ~. (Q
...::st:h
... 0 ...
o p. ~
S-erg
0'<
""'s>>5
ff 'l:j g
a ~
~ t;n-.
e.f:1'I2
~~.~
o ;:;.'
~~::r
o~...
!; 0
~0(JCl
'"' l;j s>>
o (JQ 101
1'12 S' Q..
()30....
,",00
~'"'....
~. ~
go 0
Q..CIl~
o "0 0
1'12 0 .....
-. 0 (JCl
oq ""'-
l;j e.::;.
000
""'0....,
soaso
(l) s.: 0
~ ~ ~
::=~e.
.... -
s>> 0 1'12
101 l;j .
o
.... ....>
o 1'12 !:s
~ 0'<
80"~
c:Oeo
::s (JCl -
..... ....
_<0
0'0 <
'"' ::s 0
..... '"'
e:o~
1'12.....
o.::r~
Pl 0 $a.
S' s:: -.
~ 'l:j l;j
(Qa::r
. 0 0
e? OQ'
d ;:r
0. .....
Pl 1'12
-. ....
~ 0
0Cl0"
o 0
8~ >
l;j "0 '"'
rta~
s::::l ~. S'
a.a S'
o aoq
l;j (Q ~
s, e. e.
SO(Q-
~'S'~
a.~0"
e.~ 0
e.~ g
l;j .....
oqO"O
~ l;j a
e. S, "g
~~a
~e.
~o
oJg
sog.
(Q 0
l;j ::s
o 0
::la
P"(D
'"'
00-<
....
~]
0. a.
o 0
f: ='
::r0
~~
(1) go
tn
~ ~
~ 8:
e. <'
(') tn*
o ....
l;j 0
o ='
~.
:~
::;.* .....
::r1'l2
@g-
OClO
as
o~
"'d'-4(')n
~ ~ 0 ~
(Q ~s::.g 0
W ~
O "'dO
w-::S
""'01>>(Q
~ v ::s "'d
1-..)>0
OSl;j
000.
W::sI'I2
0.
S
(Q
a
~
Q..
8
.
s-~
CDg"
~~
~"O
ci'~
0. a.
..., ~
e.m
!Jg
CD -.
pl ::s
::s CD
0.S!l
CD m
~[
()".;
::s ...,
o 0
o $.
a-o.
..., CD
g.s-
"0 CD
i>>("')
::s -.
~~
N
o
o
"0
-.
CD
m
o
H)
S-
CD
"'d
=:r-
pl
m
CD
-..J
9'
.....
~ ~
e.g"
-
o~
::S"O
.-+ -
if o'
::s ~
o ~
~ m~
::r"CD
m ::s
-'OQ
0. _.
CD ::s
o CD
H)S!l
S-m
CD=:r-
...,e.
o -
~~
o 0
::s $.
o 0.
CD CD
S-o.
CD 0
"0 a
a 3
"0 CD
~ a-
CD a
0. ~.
s::: 0
::s ::s
::;'-(3
mOQ
~ ~
CD 0.
S'ci'
~S-
o CD
~ pl
cr
-.
-
::+.
'<
......
o
...,
CD
"0
-
~
CD
S-
CD
...,
~
pl
e:
::s
OQ
I
"'d
=:r-
pl
m
CD
N
a
0.
C;'
m
f:
"0
~
o
H)
S-~
CD if
"0 ...,
g ~
0. e.
re. e.
o ::s
"OOQ
~ ~
e.
-
.
Vt
pl
8:
~
CD
a-
s-
CD
"0
a
"0
o
m
g.
~
~"'d
CD ...,
<~
~ .....
c.B
o -.
g~
S-~
CD pl
0.
~ -.
pl~
0.
-'''0
Jg-
w ~
o.m
....
pl m
-. =:r-
::Se.
~-
wCD 0.
pl CD
::s 6
0.......
CD CD
...."0
o ...,
~.o
0"0
::s 0
o m
o CD
::s 0.
t:t~
o 0
-0
"0 ...,
-CD
~-
~ ~
~.
o
::s
m
"0
o
6.-
~
pl
-
-
cr
CD
-
o
o
a
CD
0.
pl
e.
::s
~.
3
o
H)
.....
o
~
~
~
o
3
~
8-
i'
~~;i
a _.CD
s-! ~
CD CD "0
t-ts>>t:":
CD "1 0
~g~
~o.m
o.plCD
D) -::s
.., - OQ
CD 0 -.
f:H)~
~ ...... CD
o =:r-...,
..., CD m
S' "0 =:r-
oae.
-"0 -
s::: 0
~. m 0.
OCDCD
::s Q. a
o s::: 0
H)::S~
fA .........
................
o ~ a
e wCD
~ > J:
aN
S!l (:) "0
-"0 ~
CD CD ~
~ao
mCDH)
. a-......
=:r-
O'CD
::S"O
OQ ...,
.....CD
a:=:
0.3
[SO
m~
-
0"0
"0 -
CD pl
::s
.....
m m
.-+s.
o B
cr .....
CD ~
3~
e."O
a-O
pl m
S' a:
CD <
0. CD
-
o
~
~
e-
O'
~
~
-
CD
~
o
o
..,
w
Jg~
S'..,
gSl
..., e.
s::: e.
::s ::s
frOQ
..., ~
i'~
_ m
~
~ ~
o S!l
~~
CDO
~~
~~
CD
o~
H)e.
~-
Sg"
CD
~fr
jij ~.
.OQ
::s
CD
0.
8-
o
a
s
CD
0.
~
D)
~
.....
m
......
S!l
g.
~
.....
~ ;i
::s CD
O:~
"0"0
e.:=:
~ 0
aa.
S!l~
~~
;:::.0
g 0
a-
s .....
......e
if CD
m ......
s::: 0
8:~
CD 0
A~
m
::+. ~
~ ::+.
=:r-
g-
("')
::;"
'<
......
o
..,
CD
~
<'
CD
"0
a
~
m
m
.....
o
~
-
.....
m
~
CD
m
..,
~
~
0.
ci'
s-
CD
CD
~
CD
::s
m
o'
::s
o
H)
"'dj;4C1C1
~::sOpl
"'" s::: 3 "0
:'e"O ~
O -< "'d 0
w-::S
H)O$>>CD
~ w ::s "'d
~~g
OCDo.
w::sm
0.
3
CD
a-
~
0.
g
Lake Minnetonka
(St. Alban's Bay)
.
Christmas Lake
400
I
o
400 Feet
I
L
N
Exhibit A
Site Location
Lake Mlnncton.ka.
Lowv L.akc
,ole
Island
I 3
104. CHERRY TREE CT.
105. LIME TREE CT.
106. APPLE TREE CT.
lOT. PEACH TREE CT.
.
LEGEND
SUBWATERSHED BOUNDARY
CB 8
SUBWATERSHED NAME
..
DIRECTION OF FLOW
_.',
,',
SUBWATERSHEDS OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS
Q
...
i
SUBWATERSHEDS IN THE CITY
OF SHORE WOOD
'"
'"
~.".,....
.-.....,.. .;.......
'.' ,::',~,':/::;"';;':",\'::~
"::""'-,.:....,/...,"
. ' . . -." ' . '~"
-
-
AFFECTED
AREA
.:;
~
1 200 600 0
~
SCALE IN
1200 2400
, I
FEET
~I
"'~
15s
~~
1;-
~i
i..
~.
fi
il5
-...
t'"
-8
"'i
~t
S~
- .,
e
e
~
fI.
f;i
=
t:.
~
4lf.f
~
~
Exhibit B
Stonnwater Plan
.. i::i ..
I jIo'
"
APPENDIX S
March, 2000
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
MINIMUM BUILDING OPENING BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION POLlCY
~
~~..
'i,
~
'Ii
~
r~
~
Ainimum Allowed Building Qoenina Elevations
\ny new development or redevelopment within the City will.maintain minimum building openings
hree feet (3') above the anticipated high water elevation as a standard practice. However, if this
hree.Joot (3') freeboard requirement is considered a hardship, the standard could be lowered to two
ee~ (21) if the following can be demonstrated:
a)
That within the two-foot (2') freeboard area, stormwater storage is available which is
equal to or exceeds 50% of the stormwater storage currently available in the basin
below the 100-year elevation. .
.
. b) That a 25% obstruction of the basin outlet over a 24-hour period would not result in
more than one foot (1') of additional bounce in the basin.
c) An adequate overflow route from the basin is available that will provide assurance
one foot (1') of freeboard will be maintained for the proposed low building opening.
,.
'lIIinimum Allowed Basement Floor Elevations
~ny new development or redevelopment in the City must set minimum basement floor elevations to
an elevation that meets the following criteria:
~). The basement floor wiU be four feet (4') above the currently-observed groundwater
elevations in the ,area (FHA policy). .
.
b) The basement floor elevation will be two feet (2') above the elevation of any known
historic high groundwater elevations for the area. Information on historic high
groundwater elevations can be derived from any reasonable sources, includin.g
piezometer data, soil boring data, percOlation testing logs, etc. .
c) The basement floor elevation will be one foot (1') above the 100-year high-water
elevation for the area unless it can be demonstrated that this standard creates a
hardship, and that the basement floor wUlbeone foot (1') above the highest
anticipated groundwater,el~vation that could result from high surface water
elevations elevating groundwater elevations in the area during a 100-year critical
duration rainfall event. The impact of high surface water elevations on groundwater
elevations in the vicini~f the'str-l:lCture can take into consideration the site's
distance from the f100tiplain areas, the soils, the normal water elevation of surface
depressions in the are~sJ lh~, static'gr6undwater table, and historic water elevations
in the area.
Exhibit C
GreenQ
City on the Lake ~
~
'--^-./
JAN
J 0 2003
January 29, 2003
Bradley Nielsen
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood,~ 55331
Dear Brad,
.
The city has received your public hearing notice for the Comprehensive Plan amendment
to permit 12 twin-homes on the property located at 20775 Manor Road.
I have sent a copy of the notice to the adjacent neighbors on Channel Drive, Oak Lane,
St. Alban's Bay Road and St. Alban's Green in the City of Greenwood. I would expect
you would hear from some of these residents about traffic concerns.
Having discussed the project with you and a representative of Capestone Builders, I
Understand the preliminary thought is to disperse traffic to both Manor Road and
Excelsior Boulevard in an attempt to minimize the impact to the neighborhood. The City
of Greenwood is very concerned about the potential increase in traffic in the "five
comers" area.
.
The city recently required a property owner adjacent to that intersection to transfer
property to the City of Greenwood as a park dedication when he subdivided his property
in an effort to improve vision sight lines. The city, and I'm sure, the local residents will
be very interested to see what steps will be taken to ensure the continued safety of the
intersection.
If you have any questions please contact me a 952-474-4755.
Sincerely,
AWl K<Vvf~
Gus. Karpas
Zoning Coordinator
20225 Cottagewood Road . Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
(952) 474-6633 . Fax (952)474-1274 . Public Works/Building Inspections (952) 474-4755
...'
.
.
CHARLES E. WENDLE
20M St. A1balll Green. Greeo""Wd MN .s5331-8~. 612-474-(;74.
January 31, 2003
City Council Members and Planning Commission Members
City of Greenwood
20225 Cottagewood Road
Deephaven. MN 55331
City CouncU Members and Planning Commission Members
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: Attached Gus Karpus Letter to Shorewood Dated 1/29/2003 Concerning the Proposed
"Capstone Development"
Dear City Council Members and Planning Commission Members:
This letter is written in response to the Gus Karpus Letter to Shorewood Dated 1/29/2003, a
copy of which is attached hereto. I have made some general comments on this page. have
specifically addressed separate issues and concerns for Greenwood and Shorewood on following
pages and closed this ler:re.r with a brief summary.
First of all, I appreciate the City of Greenwoo(rs efforts at making the neighborhood. aware of this
issue, which is proposed in an area which borders Shorewood and Greenwood and will
definitely affect Greenwood residents. It would have been nice if Shorewood had taken the time
and courtesy to give notice to and work with Greenwood property owners, which are :In the
immediate neighborhood. I think that it is reasonable to say that no one (or at least very, ve.ry
few people) in the neighborhood would totally oppose a development in the .~shborhood
which is a positive influence on the health and safety of the individuals living in the
neighborhood and is also a positive influence on the overall property values in the
neighborhood.
Gus is correct in stating that local residents are very concerned about pedestrian safety, and to a
lesser degree. automobile safety in the "five comers" (intersection of Manor Road, St Albans Bay
Road and Suburban Drive). Adult pedestrians are very cautious about the dangers involved in
walking on Manor Road and particularly walking up the hill on Manor Road between St Albans
Green and 5t Albans Bay Road. Parents are "scared to death" to allow their children to walk (or
ride their bikes). on Manor Road in this area. There are several "blind spots" on Manor Road and
autos are frequently driving "too fast for conditions" coming down the hill on Manor Road. As
an example of this, I am aware of three accidents in the last five years between 5t Albans Green
and (fanner Greenwood Mayor) Albrecht's land development, twice where cars have gone over
the steep embankment and retaining wall between St Albans Green and former Greenwood
Mayor Albrecht's land development and once where a car went off the road exactly in this same
location, hit a tree and flipped onto its roof. Parents can only ask themselves, what if my child
bad been walking on Manor Road. at that time?
Page 1 of 6
.
.
I will separate the issues into uShorewood Concerns;) and "Greenwood Concerns" ;
Shorewood Issues and Con~ms:
1) Shorewood Issues - Pedestrian Safety Issues Related to Increased Traffic on Manor Roag
It is my understanding that the proposed "Capstone Development" is currently designed to add
an additional 24 homes or roughly 50 autos (24 units times two vehicles per unit) to the traffic
on Excelsior Boulevard. It would be clearly unacceptable to the neighborhood if the "capstone
Development" were to be designed so that their main driveway-roadway connected. directly to
Manor Road, due to the -existing serious concerns about the current status of traffic and
pedestrian safety on Manor Road. Shorewood does not have a good track record in traffic
planning in this area. There has been no apparent communication or cooperation with the city
of Greenwood in resolving safety concerns in the "five comers area." If the proposed "Capstone
Development" absolutely required that their main driveway-roadway empty Onto Manor Road, I
believe that the City of Sb,orewood actually acted to limit or totallv denv this development 10 to
12 years ago. The background for this statement is: when the exit ramp off of Highway 7 was
removed about 10 to 12 years ago, I contacted MNDOT and asked why they had removed this
exit (due to the huge amount of traffic that was now being forced through R-l single family
neighborhoods such as Excelsior Boulevard off Vine Hill Road)~ and MNDOT's response was:
"We (MND01) didn't do it. the City of Shorewood removed this exit and we can not figure OUt
why they did this incredibly stupid act, but now that it is gone, we (MNDOT) would never allow
it to be reconstructed as an access to Highway 7." For those people who do not remember this
exit, it would have "delivered" cars right to the "Front door of the proposed "Capstone
Development" (eliminating much of the additional traffic thorough R-I single family
neighborhoods) with the development "opening onto" Excelsior Boulevard. The act of removing
this exit from Highway 7 was extremely short sighted by the City of Shorewood when viewed in
tenns of the proposed "Capstone Development's" current need for adequate public road capacity.
2) Shorewood Issues - Desisn Issues. Lighting Concerns and Landscapin~ Concerns of the
Propo~ "Capstone Development"
The proposed "Capstone Development" is a relatively large multifamily development which is
being proposed in a strictly single family neighborhood in Shorewood. Shorewood could take
the position of: "This development wiU increase Shorewood's tax ba.<Je. it is at the very boundary of
Shorewood and by its proximit;y to OcJlfff properties in Shorewood, it p~e.s no real. positive or
negative effect on other Shorewood properties, so the Shorewood Planning Commission and the
Shorewood City Council can be negligent in their duties to assure a proper development is completed
at this location." Due to the location of this development, it is imperative that Shorewood work
very carefully and closely with the citizens of Greenwood and the city officials of Greenwood.
Due to the exact location Qf the prouosed "Capstone Development.'t this develoDment will affect.
either in a positive or negative way~ the citizens of Greenwood far more than the citizens of
Shorewood.
3) Shorewood Issues - Environmental Issues Concernim! the Proposed "Capstone Development"
The City of Greenwood will be directly impacted environmentally by the proposed "'Capstone
Page 2 of 6
Developmenf' due to the fact that the watershed of the Manor Park area flows down the Manor
Road hill into the proposed "Capstone Development" and all this water then flows under the road
into Greenwood and Lake Minnetonka. The addition of tens of thousands of square feet of
hardcover within the proposed "Capstone Development" will further add to the runoff. The City
of Greenwood has records of soil and sediment sampling and testing (taken during the "dredging
litigation") taken from the wetland on both sides of Manor Road which indicate the presence of
toxic materials in and near the proposed ""Capstone Development" It is imperative that
Shorewood. officials take a proactive role in protecting the health and safety of Greenwood
citizens, with regard to this proposed development.
I hereby request that the 01;1 of Shorewood immediately request that the developer complete
an EAW for the I2roposed "Capstone Develonment."
4) Shorewood Issues - Greenwood's Position A&&tnst Use of the Manor Road Property on the
Wetland bo'lJttded bv Chanuel Drive, Manor Road and St Albans Green as a "Muliti.User Matixm:
The City of Greenwood spent $75,000 to $100,000 litigating against the DNR and against the
Minnehaha Watershed District for their negligence in wrongly issuing permits to allow dredging
in the wetland_ and litigating against the develOper who wanted. to dredge a channel into the
wetland to construct and sell individual boat slips as a "Muliti-User Marina."
.
It is very important to the local Greenwood neighborhood and the ongoing cooperative
relationship of the cities of Greenwood and Shorewood tha.t Shorewood officials take a. proactive
role in making sure that the proposed "Capstone Development" does not "reincarnate" the
"Muliti-User Marina" concept in the wetland bordered by Channel Drive. Manor Road and St
Albans-Green,--in other words, the Shorewood City Council and Planning Commission must
make it very clear to the developer that "any dock related outlots (across Manor Road in
Greenwood) associated with the proposed "Capstone Development" will absolutely be prohibited
and a direct violation of the developer's agreement between Developer Capstone and the City of
Shorewood.
.
5) Shorewood Issues - lllesal Snowmobile Traffic Across Private Property II} Greenwood Near
the p{oDOsed "'Canstone Develoj)D.].~nt"
There exists substantial illegal snowmobile traffic which originates in Shorewood, traverses near
the proposed "Capstone Development" and then illegally trespasses on property in the City of
Greenwood to gain access to the Lake. Last year the City of Greenwood posted a "No
Snowmobiling" sign on Manor Road and the sign was tom down, apparently by one or more of
the problem parties. The City of Greenwood spent the money to replace the sign with a "No
Motor vehicles" sign. but snowmobilers from Shorewood continue to ignore the sign. This is a
"Capstone Development" neighborhood issue which the City of Greenwood needs the help and
cooperation of the City of Shorewood to apprehend and prosecute the individuals involved.
Greenwood Issues and Concerns:
1) Greenwood Issues - Pedestrian Safety Issu~s Related to Increased Traffic on Manor Road
I have an objection to Gus' last statement in his letter where he says, "The City, and I'm su.re, the
Page 3 of 6
local residents will be very interested to see what steps will be taken (0 ensure the continued safery of
the intersection." The truth is that :
the City of Greenwood has done absqWtely nothin~. to date, to im,prmre the safety Qf the
intersecti2U.
All of the local residents clearly believe that Developer-Mayor Albrecht's transferring a very
minimal (totally unuseable land) square footage of land to the City was merely an effon between
the Developer and certain members of the Planning Commission to make the development less
than 2.00 acres (1.99 acres) so as to circumvent the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's
jurisdiction over "Developments which are 2.00 acres or larger."
I hex:ebv request that Greeqwood immediately authorize the removal of all of the brush and
tre~, on the CItY right of way on the east and nonh sides of the Albrecht develonment to
accomplish t:l\e ~oa1 that Gus recited: "tq ilnprove vision site line~t"
.
This is a relatively minor expense and can be paid out of general funds or out of the "park
dedication funds from the Albrecht development."
If the City of Greenwood feels that it can not afford to spend this minimal amount Qf money
on this im~nant safety issue. I hereby request that Greenwood formally a>>prove ~
immediate removal of all of the h(Ush and trees on tbe Cjly rirht~f-way on the east and
north sides of tqe Albrecht development by the netzhborhood residents.
I am sure that if the City will not pay for this safety measure, we can organize more than
adequate personnel with chain saws, etc. to quickly remove the trees and brnsh lIto improve
vision site lines." Greenwood Cily Council Members and Planning- Commission Members: If
there is any hesitation whatsoever in acting or a total refusal to act immediately on this safety
issue, this "Failure to At::t." will publically confirm to all citizens of Greenwood and Shorewood
that this transfer of a very minimal (totally unuseable land) square footage of land to the City
was merely an effort between the Developer and certain members of the Planning Commission to
make the development less than 2.00 acres (1.99 acres) so as to circumvent the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District's jurisdiction over "Developments which are 2.00 acres or largert i.e.
Greenwood had no real interest in "the continued safety of the intersection. 11
Greenwood Citv Council Mtunbers: the baIl it; in. your court; the time is here to immediately
demonstrate your true inun1ions to either act or not to act on this important. public safety issue.
.
The neighborhood could "drag in 20. 30 or 40 local residents to the Council Meeting (again)/'
but the Greenwood City Council and the Greenwood Planning Commission clearly have DO
credibility with the local residents - whatever "corrupt deals" that have been struck are going
to happen, with or without "dragging in 20, 30 or 40 local residents to the Council Meeting." so
I sincerely hope that the Greenwood Council will do the right thing this time.
It is my understanding that the proposed "Capstone Development" is currently designed to add
an additional 24 homes or roughly 50 autos (24 units times two vehicles per unit) to the traffic
on Excelsior Boulevard. It would be clearly unacceptable to the neighborhood if the "Capstone
Development" were to be designed so that their main driveway.roadway connected directly to
Manor Road. due to the existing serious concerns about the current status of traffic and
pedestrian safety on Manor Road.
Page 4 of 6
..
.
.
2) Greenwood Issues - Desiil'l Issues. Ughtin~ Concerns and Landscaping Concerns of the
Proposed "Caostone Development"
The proposed uCapstone Development" is a relatively large multifamily development which is
being proposed in a strictly R-l single family neighborhood in the adjoining City of Shorewood
which could very easily take the position of: "This development will increase Shorewood's tax
base. it is at the very bou.ndn.ry of Shorewood and by its proximity to other properties in Shor-ewooct
it poses no real poaitive or negative effect on other Shorewood properties, so the Shorewood Planning
Commission and the Shorewood City Council can be negligent in their duties to assure a proper
development is completed at this location." GreenwOQSi City Council Members: Due to the
location of this development, you are going to have to use any and all influence that you have
with the City of Shorewood to make certain that this development is a positive influence on the
health and safety of the Greenwood citizens living in the neighborhood and is also a positive
influence on the overall property values in the neighborhood. These measures by the
Greenwood City Council should include insisting that Greenwood officials be included in the
planning process and litigating with the City of Shorewood if it becomes necessary. Due to the
exact location of the proposed "Capstone Development." this development will affect. either in a
DOsitive or nentive wav. the citizens of Greenwood far more than anv citizens or Shorewood.
3) Greenwood Issqes - Environmental Issues Concerning the Proposed uCapstone Development"
The Oty of Greenwood will be directly impacted environmentally by the proposed "Capstone
Development" due to the fact that the watershed of the Manor Park area flows down the hill into
the proposed "Capstone Development" and this water then flows under the road into Greenwood.
The addition of tens of thousands of square feet of hardcover within the proposed "Capstone
Developmenttt will funher add to the runoff. The City of Greenwood has records of soil and
sediment sampling and testing (taken during the "dredging litigation") taken from the wetland
on both sides of Manor Road which indicate the presence of toxic materials in and near the
proposed "Capstone Development" It is imperative that Greenwood officials take a proactive role
in protecting the health and safety of Greenwood citizens, witb regard to this proposed
development.
I hereby request that the City of Greenwood immediately request that an HAW be completed
for the proposed "Capstone DeveloJ?ment."
41 Greenwood's Position Apinst the Use of the Manor Road Frontage Property on the Wetland
bounded by Channel Drive. Manor Road and 8t Athans Green as a "Muliti-User Matins:
The City of Greenwood spent $75,000 to $100,000 litigating against the DNR., against the
Minnehaha Watershed District, and against the developer who wanted to dredge a channel into
the wetland to construct and sell individual boat slips as a "Muliti-User Marina:' It is imperative
that Greenwood officials take a proactive role in making sure that the proposed IlCapstone
Development" does not "reincarnate" the "MuJiti-User Marina" concept in the wetland bordered
by Channel Drive, Manor Road and 5t Atbans Green including litigating with the City of
Shorewood and or the developer, if it becomes necessary.
5) Greenwood Issues - Illegal Snowmobile Traffic Across Private Prope~ in Greenwood Near
the Prooosed "CaDStone Development"
There exists substantial illegal snowmobile traffic which originates in Shorewood, traverses near
Page 5 of 6
Ii./
the proposed "Capstone Development" and then illegally trespasses on propeny in the City of
Greenwood to gain access to the Lake. Last year the City of Greenwood posted a "No
Snowmobiling" sign on Manor Road and the sign was tom down, apparently by the problem
parties. The City of Greenwood spent the money to replace the sign with a "No Motor Vehicles"
si~ but snowmobilers from Shorewood continue to ignore the sign. This is a "Capstone
Development" neighborhood. issue which the City of Greenwood needs the help and cooperation
of the City of Shorewood to locate and prosecute the individuals involved.
6) Greenwood Issues. One more serious safety issue is the location of the driveway for the new
home, under constnlction on the Albrecht development at the "five comers." Most dties have
"Minimum setbacks (for driveways) from intersections." One potential long term permanent
resolution of the safety issue at "five corners" would be to actUally move Manor Road 30 to 40
feet westward to the western edge of the public right of way at Manor Road's intersection with St
Albans Bay Road. If Greenwood were to fully use the dedicated roadway on the east side of the
Albrecht development (the City's dedicated roadway extends west from the pavement 30 to 40
feet), the driveway which has been roughed in by the new home builder, will be extremely close
to the Manor Road - St Albans Bay Road street comer.
.
I hereby request that the City of Greenwood immediately review this matter on the site. with
the home builder and with rellard to City ordinances. as well as with the police de,partment so
that the home builder does not need to tear up a new asphalt or new concrete driveway to
conform with serious safety issues. i.e. the driveway at the house WIder construction slwu1sJ
be a minimum of~O feet (westWard) from the (eastern) Dronert;y line - npt ~O feet from the
current roadway pavement.
SUMMARY of Greenwood and Shorewood Issues and Concerns
This proposed "Capstone Development" can become a very positive influence on the health and
safety of the individuals living in the neighborhood and also a positive influence on the overall
propeny values in the neighborhood, such as the II Amesbury Development" has become in the
Shorewood and Deephaven communities. However, this result will require the combination of a
very responsible developer/builder and the "intimate cooperation, communication and common
goals" betWeen the cities of Greenwood and Shorewood.
.
I realize that politicians, planning comm~n members <J1l.d <flex council members "Teart'" much
more directly to ""wacky. illogical ar,wnents 'spewed at.. them'l?Y irare cim:ens at public
meed.n,fs.>> but 1 hqpe that YOU :will ecu;h take the time to read and understand the issues
~crlhe.d above. Either YOU will have the intelligence and concern to read. u,nderstand and ad:
on the issues raiseti ar YOU will not.
Thank you for your time.
Page 6 of 6
tf"
j
.
.
t-eD U;::: u", U(;'::"I'~
n~J.uJ. allY 1.&11I vu.......c.:-. .....
r' .
FILE COpy
Bradley Nielsen
PlanQing Director
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood. MN 5533 J
.(,.!{'''''l tl. _ ,':_ ;"~
l.~ (;1-1" /,1
January 3 J. 2003
Dear Mr. Nielsen.
We are writing in regard to the property devdapment plan for 12 twin homes On 2tJnS Manor Road. We
understand from the Greenwood Zoning Coordinator. Gus Karpas that the preliminary plan is to disperse traffic to
both Manor Road and F.x~l$ior Boulevard in an .ffort to "minirQia the h'nlJU~tlu the neighborhood".
Our concern, and that of the I')cighbol'll who .." here represented. is that having additional traffic entering and
leaving Manor road at the location of the cuneot Cannic:hiels driveway would constitute a serious safety hazard for
holh pedestrians and mCIoriGb. There .\rc at least fuur issues that make an entryway on Manor Road a very poor
choice for this development.
I. Tht: pruputied portion of Manor Toad has very poor sight lines due to the curve of the roadway
both north and south of Ihe driveway.
2. Trees, due to both their mltturity and density on both aides of the roadway. obstruct drivf!r', vi~w
until they are very near! y on top of that section of roadway.
3. Manor Road from 5 cumers (the intersection of Suburban Drive. St. Albans Bay Rd.. and Manor
Rd.) to Channel Dr. has a very steep grade. Unfortunately thf! nalural tendency for traffic coming
down that hill is to exceed the speed limit. This hazard. combined with the cW've. and the mature
trees obstructing sight lines make this a particularly hazardous area to add additional traffic flow.
4. There are 3 public school hll" "tops between 5 comera and Excelsior Blvd on Manor ROctd.
If the concern of the developer were to "minimize the impact to the neighborhood" surrounding the proposed
devel~nt it would sNlm a far better choice to makc the sole: entry/exit puinl on Excelsior Boulevard. This
section ofloadway is relatively straight with unobstructed siaht lines and less densely populated.
H) e~ '. t.A" .E,L:-
cc: Gus Karpas, Greenwood zoning coordinator
Terl)" N/1g(.\ Greenwood Mayor
I am in agreement with the concerns listed itl this letter and by signinB hr.!? register my opposition to an entry/exit
point for the proposed development on Manor Rd.
Print Name
Address
2.Pf(gS'" QMN€L lJ~,
f41!..f> t<, Jc.$ ~ n-t
_,Joa n. rV), ~toh~ ~
a.O'8QS (;,.,r.;")Y)€ I D.....
) I C \ II ~
()~ttrl~ C:> fl C'JC€ /<..
J~ \.,,, ,.) _\ .5.('P\ e,
/"' .-;'I'~""'\ J '. ~. ~.~, sf,."., 'Il."'" t. i'l - S"';"" (J ~.. f c> )r '4)1 j......, (Me-
HcidiandTilnCulbert 20845 Channel Drive Greenwood, MN 55331
....---t
e,-':;:=':~"''''
~'
,
.
.
~eD U~ U~ U':~bp
Helal ana 11m ~U!Der~
;:j;;JC-"'U-bU;:jb
p. !
I am in agreement with the concern!: listed in this letter and hy signing here register my opposition to an entryfexil
point for the proposed development on Munor Rd.
~,r.int Name
Address
Jpgto SI/1lfrJAs ~~
" ..V '~v.'~ '~~O "S\. A(t:Pfl~6~
7.. (:.>e 70 s-( ~,.-- J G
c ~..,., ,'\I U 5. e (J...U..rv1~)o.A.d.
I (is m~e..1 let""
LYAIJ"&i J.lve'L~
6/ f}ii ont;
& rtl(~ A f !r /J1a
Heiill WN Tiu\ Culbert
2aWS Channel Dri vc:
Greenwood. MN ssm
2- 0 t::! Z.V OAI<... Lo..ne....
2JO 35 C/tLk. Lo..I1 e
2J () .~ ).- O/lIL U1riL
2U'/) tA/:., Lef/l .
2tJ 11 r ()4f.. L'1~ .
g10~~
sa 50 rna.,M#V Rei.,
.1a uL..:;;'I~HJ.J
r- E! E.J. .':'.'! ...':J.~. :1..':J.:.~...... ............. ..... .,. .... ..........
...::1 :;:).o:::..~."t f.':!.~.lJ. :-:'..1....1...
.. f'.~...~ .........
.
Jeannie W. Bowers - Stead
21600 Fairview Street
Greenwood, Minnesota 55331
Phone # 952-474-9229
Fax # same
\J
X\ ~~
. I \"'~
'00
'.J
-::::
1\v
FAX COVER SHEET
.
from: JEANNIE W.BOWERS - STEAD
Dote:
Office location: Q-eenwood
Phone number: 952-474-9229
o Urgent 0 2epiy ASAP [J Please comment ~ ?tease review' 0 For your information
Total pages, including cover: 7 ~~ ~ j
Comments:
.
~\t~)c" ~\~\J ~~ y\S lu.s~ 'A'\'. ~\W.~
4: ~ \... t<\'\ \\',\ ~Vr.. \vi, l'I\uk....\/ ~~ ~U~{;
') 1 ~\~t\\,SS
. ch.-~'~) c1
\\c\&m:. j)w.1t~\o> ,\,n~.,! )P(\(.~~I\~ll.l~
')b ~~{~ ~~~ ~~~" &
~ X ~\ . t:,
u.-:---- &~ c;.
-.... -,-cf1~-----
..-...-....-. ...-..--....-..-..-..
uL::lI t:.t1U
::l~I!:-"t("t-U..::J.L.L
...r..f!. ~.. .":'.'! ..':-'.~.. .~.':'.:..u. ~.4!1.
'II
.
.
D~c 10 02 11:25a
Cath~ Davis
9524701551
Catherine and Peter Davis
20870 81. Atbans Green
(7reenwood.~ 55331
December 10,2002
Greenwood City Council
City Of Greenwood, c/o Deephaven City Hall .
Deephaveo..Iv1N" 55331
Dear Greenwood City Council Members:
There is no ~ way to walk or ride up Manor road. Foot travel is especially dangerous along
the top of the hill because there is no sboulder, the roadway is steep and visibility is obscured by
the approach and curves of the roadS'. This point was recognized at the public hearing portion ()f
the planning commission meeting approving the Albrecht Shores subdivision. At the time, Mr.
Albrecht donated additionat land to allow the city sufficient space to construct a sidewaJk and
other improvements to this dangerous intersection.
Our family is most concerned by the fact that at least four school busses stop each morniog and
afternoon at various points of the S-way Manor Road - Sub\lrban - St. Albans Bay Road
intersection. VlSibility for cars is difficult and many don't even know when and where to stop as
they approach the intersection because the'roads do not meet in one place, Children cannot be
seen by approaching cars and they have no safe place to stand and wait for the b\lS. This
situation is most dangerous during the winter when students are forced to stand in the street itself
because of the snow b~ed along'th'e roadside. Given the current conditions, we don't feel
comfortable allowing our daughter to wlllk to the school bus stop without an adult to act as a
spotter for traffic and other hazards in the roadway.
A paved walkway would not only give pedestrians a safer approach to a dangerous intersection,
but it would serve to open up the intersection and increase visibility for drivers as welL
. M~y children ( and adults) from Greenwood and surrounding communities walk through this
dangerous intersection on their way to tbe school bus stop, Manor park, and the Greenwood
Walking Path and the RegionaJ Trail. The $2,000 grant from the State of Minnesota, coupled
with the gift of land from the Albrechts. are a great start for: an urgently needed pedestrian and
vehicle safety improv.ernerrt project. '
We urge you to use all available funds to make as many improvements as possible immediately.
. ~..
~
aVlS
p..~..<::::
p. 1
:.
"
r-ec U"t U..:l .Lu:U.La
l:lL;::) I 1=.':111.....
...................................
.::'.?<.==.. ...'! f.......-:..ll. ~~..:I:....
.. .... ..... ...... F...~..:-? ... ....
:/
.
.
May 24, 2002
21050 Oak Lane
Greenwood, :tvfN" 5533 I
Preliminary Plat - Alan Albrecht. Albrecht Shores. 5196 S1. Alban' 5 Bay
Road. (Rl~A, 15,000) request to create a four lot plat from a two acre
parcel.
Re: Albrecht Shores Subdivision
Dear GREENWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
You may recall that at the Planning Commission Meeting I expressed my concern
regarding the safety ofadding another driveway exiting onto Manor Road as shown on
Mr. Albrecht's preliminary plat. This document does not show that thl'!rf> ::!rl'! ::!lrl'!f1riy fiv~
streets convenrinl'Z at the northeastern ed~es of his property, nor does it indicate the
presence of a park used by both children and adults. This is not a safe inter<::ection , '>Ie
Manor Road, between 81. Albans Bay Road and Excelsior Boulevard, is not a safe road.
It is a busy road with many twists and turns and blind areas.
It also appears that Mr. Albrecht is proposing that the required 30 ft. setback for Lots 1
and 2 of the Preliminary Plat be measured from the edge of the road and not from his
property line, which would be the edge of the city's right-of-way. This right-of-way is
needed in order to proVide for Greenwood's "future development, safe streets, passage
way for walking, running, biking, etc." This right-of-way cannot be classified as a front
yard. It should be considered for a pedestrian/bike path.
. Section 630:00 - Public Right of Way Regulation states, "The public welfare requires
that the public right-of-ways within the City of Greenwood, including highways, roads,
streets and alleys, be reserved for public purposes. Public use of the full width of the
right-of-ways is necessary to public safety and the proper and efficient maintenance of
the ri~ht-of-w~S."
I trust that you will consider the above when making your decision concerning the
Albrecht Shores Subdivision.
Thank you.
Elizabeth Bergquist
CITY COUNCIL
DEEPHA VEN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
20225 COTT AGEWOOD ROAD
JUNE 4, 2002
7:30 P.M.
a.'@0:\'f..
I, J tH~~f91
I' ~ if
:1 ~ II,.
11 0, 11 J1UI
~tqtlll/r
ii 61fUUl
ig~ j
K
...~ ~'1
eJ....J
I .. fl P'
I i!!lll
I 'if I :r
, f l N
I ...-
U't ~ .
,.'......~~..lIoooC....,..,~
.
"
: III
'0
Ii I
~ e> I
~~'"
/
/
,t-
iC
:..
~C
:1\
'CIl
'c;
r
iu
;rr
'::I
:t
o
f
,.
~
:U
'U
'1\
, I
;~
:,
,~
, I
:C
:c...
=....
~...
g I
"'/~'" .
../ :O.~
of' J:i.)>
~S
:0
.?
!
''11
;.
:~
... ec,,":'''t U.:l :L.lJ..:..":'~;a.."
l>L::1It:.t1U
.. ... ....... "'~.. ...... ... "
.L ,,,...., .."" F...~..;:)
,," ..~~,~,:: ..'.:':I:-:-..l:'~.L..,,,.. ..,.. ,," ,.. ,..
/
Petition
(P~y
,;
Dear Greenwood City CouDcil Member:
City of Greenwood. cf-o Deephaven City Hall
fax ##952-474-4755
. COMMENTS:
Please accept this petition. along with other petitions which are submitted by other concerned
citizens as a strong expression of my concern for the safety of pedestrian traffic along Manor
Road bordering the Albrecht property. I hereby petition the City of Greenwood to use any
available fWlds to immediately cut down all trees, bushes and brush in the area of the comer of
Manor Road and St Alhans Bay Road which are on City owned property to improve automobile-
pedestrian visibility and to construct, as soon as possible. a sidewalk or other deslgnated public
walkway. If sufficient funds are not CWTently available. please use aU available funds to do as
much as possible now, and complete this work when additional funds are available.
.
Signed
Address
Printed Name
r-ec
u"t u~ .L u: u.r:::a ..................,.L.~.I..l:...':1.!J....
.. ... ...~" .... ....... ... ... . ,. '" ... ...
.....,.............":....
;;j;:)~..~.:. (.~..-:..'-:I.::='...L..~..... ................ ..... ......... F...~..":'... ...........
"
Section 630:00
. I
\........-i Section 630:00 - Public Right of Way Relrulation
. .,
Section 630:00. Purpose, The public welfare requires that the public right-of.;ways wi~in thp City .
of Greenwood. including highways, roads, streets and alloys, be reserved for public purposes. Public
use of the full width of the right-of.ways is necessary to public safety and the proper and effioient
maintenance of the riiht-of-ways. However. it is recognize<1 that limited private use or encroachment
. onto the right..of-ways is not necessarily incon5istent with public use. It is t1e purpose of this
ordinance to provide for lawful incidental private use of publicly owned right-of-ways not
. inconsistent with public use.
.
Section 630:05. Permit. The right to use publicly owned right-of-ways within the City of
Greenwood for any private use or purpose other than the primary purpose of public travel. whether
such use constitutes substantial or incidental use. may be acquired only through permit granted
pursuant to this ordinance, Any private proper located within or encroaching upon publicly owned
right..of-ways. which has not been authorized in accordance with this ordinance, shall be unlawful
and subject to removal.
'---"
Section 630:10. Application. Any person may apply to the City 'Council of the City of Greenwood
for a pennit to keep or maintain private property within a publicly owned right-of-way. The
application shall be in writing and must describe with specificity the private property and rlght-of-
way involved, and the nature and extent of the requested encroachment The City Council may grant
the permit if it is determined that the use applied for is incidental and not inconsistent with safe and
efficient public use. However. no permit will be issued until the applicant has agreed in writing to
. waive any right to recover from the City of Greenwood for damage occurring to the property located
within the right-of-way which may result from the perfonnance of the City of Greenwood or its
agents of its public duties required by law.
.
Section 630:15. Revocation. The City of Greenwood reserves the right to revoke any permit granted
under this ordinance as may be required by the public interest.
..L.-
;~~
....ec
u"t u.~... :1..lJ..:..lJ. ~ ~.....
",-,'
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
. G.
H.
I.
/
\ .
',-.-./
.
Subd. 2.
. """
!. \
C,I:'
uL:3It:.t1U
~:::) C..-::.:. f.:..- ':-:' :"..l...~..... .
...P.~f
Section 600:00 .
When a new subdivision adjoins un subdivided land susceptible to being
divided, then the new streets shall be carried to the boundaries of such
un subdivided land.
Width. All right-of-way widths shall be a minimum qf 50 feet except where a
wider minimum width is shown on the Cit'j's Plan.
Reverse O.rrves. Tangents of at least SO feet in length shall be introduced
between reverse curves on collector streets.
Street Grades. AU center line gradients shall be at least 0.4 percent, and shaU
not exceed 10 percent.
Minor Streets. Minor streets shall b~ so aligned that their use by through
traffic will be discouraged.
Street JOgs. Street jogs with center-line offsets of less than 125 feet shall be
avoided.
Safe Intersections. It must be evidenced that all stree\ intersections and
confluences encourage safe arid effic.ient traffic flow..
Alleys. Alleys are not permitted in residential areas.
Cul-de-Sacs. Each cul-de-sac shall be provided at the closed. end with a turn-
around having an outside roadway diameter of at leas! 80 feet, and a street
property line diameter at least 100 feet.
1. Half-Streets. Half streets shall be prohibited, ex.cept where essential to the
reasonable development of the subdivision and adjoinil:1g unsubdivided areas.
K. Reserve Strips. Reserve strips controlling access to streets shall be prohibited
except under conditions approved by the council.
1. Hardship to Owners of Adioining Property A voided. The street arrangements
shall not be such as to cause hardship to owners of adjoining property in
platting their own land and providing convenient acce:;s to it.
M. Street Interval. In general. provisions shall be made at intervals not exceeding
one-half mile tor through streets (streets running through the subdivision in a
fairly direct manner).
N. Intersections. In general, streets shall intersect at right angles.
Easements.
A.
Utilities. Easement at least 14 feet wide, centered on rear and other lot lines.
shall be provided for utilities, where necessary. They shall have continuity of
alignment from block to block. At deflection points, c:asements for pole-line
a.'1chors shall be provided where necessary.
Drainage. Where a subdivision is traversed by a water course, there shall be
provided a drainage way, channel or drainage right-of-way conforming
substantially with the lines of such water course, together with such further
width or construction of both. as will be adequate for storm-water run-off.
B.
:,. .
....".'::-::11 t:.':'U .....,..
r:..er::l.....':'':!...I.:-'':'...:1...~;..l.l..::I~........... ..
-U.::I.L.L
::I;:)':.-"t ,"t. .. .. '"
F...~..':'.
.
Lake Minnetonka
. (St. Alban's Bay)
400
L-:....-...
o
. '11-:-:
400 Feet /).
N
I
~
)--
~~
~ ~c
ChristmaS\,La~e j ~
\~f..)~t\,\ \\,
'f.~)QI.'. "h ~ ~\~~i \J~\ . ~
., ~ \~..~ ~,,)i{j
~t't~C~~) ~
\\ ~,\\
,..
..... .'
.
.
.... e~...':'~...lJ.:-:'._..!.':-'.:":':'4!I"
l:oL..::lltMU
..~.. ... ~.. ... ... ... ... ," .... ... ~." .
;:l.;).:C:,,:~ .t."!.. ..L.' ~~.~... ...
~.
GreenQ
City on the Lake ~
~
.............
January 291 2003
Bradley Niel!lel1
City of Shorewood
5755 COlUltry Club Road
Shorc'Wood, MN 55331
Dear Brad,
The city has received YOW' public hearing notice for the Comprehensive Plan amendment
to permit 12 twin-homes on the property located at 20775 Manor Road.
I have sent a copy of the notice to the adjacent neighbors on Channel Drive, Oak Lane,
St. Alban's Bay Road and St. Alban's Green in the City of Oreenwood. r would expect
you would hear from some of these residents about traffic concerns.
Having discussed the project with you and a representative of Capes tone Builders, J
understand the preJiminary thought is to disperse traffic to both Manor Road and
Excelsior Boulevard in an attempt to minimize the impact to the neighborhood. The City
of Greenwood is very concerned about the potential increase in traffic in the '(five
corners" area.
The city recently required a property owner adjacent to that intersection to transfer
property [0 the City of Greenwood as a park dedication when he subdivided his property
in an effort to improve vision sight lines. The city, and I'm sure, the local residents will
be very interested to See what steps will be taken to ensure the continued safety of the
intersection.
If you have any questions ple8$e contact me a 952-474-4755.
Sincerely,
. A~ KWf~
Gus Karpas
Zoning Coordinator
20225 Cottagewood Road . E)/Cel~ior. Minnesoto .55331
19521474-6633 . Fax (952).4704-i274 . Public Works/8uilding Inspecfions (952) 4~4.4755
.. .".... f.'"~,,~.,,. ........."...
reo
...,J......
.
.
U"t
U..:l .Lu:uoa
.............",.....
uL~It:.HlJ
::IOc:-"t/"t-U..:l.L.L
.................. . ....... ..........
... f.'..~...~..l.'.... .
~horewood
P(JBUC HEARING NOTICE
I3LANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Who:
Capestone Builders, 20775 Manor Road plus adjacent parcels
What:
Public Headilg for request of a Comprehens1ve Plan
Amendment/RezoninglPlanned Unit Development
Why:
Capestone Builders is requestmg approval of an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan and rezoning from R-IA, Single-family residential to
P.D.D., Planned Unit Development, for property located at 20775 Manor Road
including certain adjacent parcels (Carmichael's auto salvage. property). The
proposal is to build 12 twin-homes (24 dwelling units), plus one single-family
home on the properties which total approximately 11 acres.
When:
Tuesday, February 4.2003 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible
Where:
Shorewood City Hall Council Chambers, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood
Legal Descnption of the property is en file at City Hall.
.P.I.N Nos. 36-117-23-22-0025 and 25-117-23-33-0009, 0010, and 0011
1Il$*See Map on Reverse Side **'"
The proposed platl is available for l'eview at City Hall.
Verbal and written comments wIll be tvilsidered at the hearing.
Anyone having questions relative to thIs matter may contact Brad Nielsen, Planning Director, or
the Plannmg Department by phone at 952-474-3236, or by FAX at 952-474-0128
Or you may submIt your wnuen commenCS via 'U.S. Mail to;
City of Shorewood
c/o Planning Dept.
5755 Country Club Road
Shore woOd, MN 55331
City of Shorewood
BRADLEY 1. NIELSEN
Planning DirtClOt
Brad Nielsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Fasching
Tuesday, February ii, 2003 10:40 AM
Brad Nielsen; Craig Dawson; Larry Brown; Twila Grout; 'Larry Brown (E-mail)'
FW: potential manor road realignment - 5 corners
-----Original Message-----
From: K. Koppes [mailto:KoppesK@netscape.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 B:45 AM
To: wlove@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Cc: jgarfunkel@ci.shorewood.mn.us; clizee@ci.shorewood.mn.us;
Iturgeon@ci.shorewood.mn.us; szerby@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Subject: potential manor road realignment - 5 corners
2/11/03
.':; ': ,.:,~'. ';;"";i".;,
POTENTIAL REALIGNMENT OF MANOR ROAD FOR PEDESTRIAN AND AUTO SAFETY ISSUES.
~I have some comments:
1. Hardly anyone but my wife & I ever walk down Manor Road hill. In all
the years since I've lived in Shorewood (24), I've yet to meet anyone
walking on this hill (except after Excelsior's July 4th fireworks).
2. In my opinion, straightening the road will not make the road safer.
In fact it will allow cars to travel faster and create more of a safety
issue.
3. I disagree with the idea of people being 'funneled' down Manor Road
to split the stress of more cars between Excelsior Blvd. & Manor Rd.
People living in the new Capstone Development area will have very
little incentive to go north. My guess is that they'll want to reach
Highway 7 in the fastest way possible, and this will only increase the
stress for the people living on Old Excelsior Blvd. .
Recommendations:
.1. Consider building a walking/bike path down the Manor Rd. hill in the
area where someone wants to move the road. If you really want to do it
right, extend the path northwest from Manor road up St. Albans Bay Road
to Minnetonka Blvd. St. Albans Bay Road is extremely dangerous for
walking because of all the curves and the amount of traffic using this road.
2. Open Highway 7 at the signal lights for Capstone people. I realize
the MNDOT will oppose this idea but it never hurts to try. I also
realize that this may create problems with the skateboard area, but I
think the problems could be handled.
3. If necessary to prevent increased traffic on Old Excelsior
Blvd.between St. Albans Bay Rd. & Vine Hill, close off Excelsior Blvd.
somewhere between Manor Road and St. Alban's Bay Road. Many cars use
Excelsior Blvd during rush hour as a shortcut to Excelsior to avoid
having to wait for signal lights
4. Enforce the Stop sign laws at 5 corners.
Kenneth J. Koppes
50BO Suburban Drive
Shorewood, MN 55331
1
v '/ . ~
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE VvL) Y
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING . 'V tp" ~
Capestone Builders, 20775 Manor Road plus adjacent parcels '~'
Public Hearing for request of a Comprehensive Plan 11'114' ) -A/
Amendment/RezonmglPlanned UOlt Development. [;i/) o'
Capestone Builders is requesting approval of an amendment to the /'"' 'I
Comprehensive Plan and rezoning from R-1A, Single-family residential to '-j~./
P.U.D., Planned Unit Development, for property located at 20775 Manor Road oP~ oJ
including certain adjacent parcels (Carmichael's auto salvage property). The \
proposal is to build 12 twin-homes (24 dwelling units), plus one single-family ~
home on the properties which total approximately 11 acres. '\..1 U
/0
I (/
"
Who:
What:
Why:
.
When:
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible
Where:
Shorewood City Hall Council Chambers, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood
Legal Description of the property is on file at City Hall.
P.I.N Nos. 36-117-23-22-0025 and 25-117-23-33-0009,0010, and 0011
.
***See Map on Reverse Side ***
The proposed plan is available for review at City Hall.
Verbal and written comments will be considered at the hearing.
""'~-'" .--- ,,'--.-- ,
Anyone having questions relative to this matter may contact Brad Nielsen, Planning Director, or
the Planning Department by phone at 952-474-3236, or by FAX at 952-474-0128
Or you may submit your written comments via U.S. Mail to:
City of Shorewood
c/ o 'Planning pept.
5755 Country CHlbRoa,d.., ..
Shorewood,MN 55331,
City of Shorewood
FEe 24 2003
I :"
: ,l
BRADLEY J. NIELSEN
Planning Director
'"-''' J!
......,....'........
....---.
j
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
27 February 2003
RE:
Capestone Ponds P.D.D. ~ Concept Plan
FILE NO.:
405 (03.01)
BACKGROUND
.
The Capestone Ponds P.D.D. was continued from the 4 February Planning Commission
meeting to 4 March, pending receipt of the environmental studies that had been ordered
for the site. Additionally, the issue of a trail along Manor Road was to be forwarded to
the Park Commission for review and comment. To date, we have received the Phase I
and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, prepared by Liesch Associates,
Inc. Attached as Exhibit A is an executive summary of Liesch's findings. Exhibit B is a
proposal by Liesch for the next step in resolving contamination issues on the site. Exhibit
C is the excerpted Phase II report prepared by Liesch. Anyone interested in wading
through the complete report can do so in our office.
We attempted to place the trail issue on the 25 February Park Commission agenda,
however, the agenda was limited to an open house meeting relative to organized sports.
It has now been scheduled for 11 March. The timing of the Park Commission review is
not considered critical, since it is simply a question of whether they are willing to use the
park dedication fees for this project toward a trail on Manor Road.
The site boundary issue has been resolved. The subject site is entirely within the
Shorewood City limits.
ft
'-.1 PRINTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER
:#=0.E~
.
.
Memorandum
Re: Capestone P.U.D.
27 February 2003
It is recommended that the Comprehensive Plan be amended, revising the Proposed Land
Use map from "Minimum Density Residential (0-1 units per acre) to "Low to Medium
Density (2-3 units per acre). The area plan for Planning District 12 should include
language tying the increased density to the provision of city services (i.e. municipal
water).
It is further recommended that the Concept Plan be approved subj ect to the
recommendations included in the Planning and Engineering staff reports distributed for
the 4 February meeting. The Park Commission's recommendations should be
incorporated into the Development Stage approvals for the project.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Brian Harju
-2-
.
.
-
-
---
-
-
LIi:stH
~
Liesch Associates, Inc. . 13400 15th Avenue North. Minneapolis,:MN 55441
Phone: (763) 559-1423. Toll Free: (800) 338-7914. Fax: (763) 559-2202
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Roger Anderson, Anderson Engineering
Dana J. Wagner, CHMM ~
February 27, 2003
Summary of the Environmental Site Assessment Activities at Capestone Ponds
Project, 20755 Manor Road, Shorewood, MN (the Property).
Per your request, Liesch Associates, Inc. (Liesch) has prepared the following brief summary of
environmental issues at the above-referenced site. The following summarizes the findings of the
assessments to date:
. The Property has been operated as an automotive salvage yard since approximately 1955.
. Petroleum compounds have been detected in shallow soils.
. Soils have been impacted with low-levels of heavy metals.
. Soils have been impacted with low-levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
. Groundwater has been impacted by low levels of petroleum compounds.
. The impacts require reporting to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
. Further characterization of the impacts detected needs to be undertaken.
. The site impacts can be addressed via actions approvable by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency and, in Liesch's experience, development for residential purposes is possible.
Please call if you have any questions. Thank you and best regards.
Sa/62000 13/ Andersonmemo21503
Exhibit A
PHASE II - EXEC. SUMMARY
Capes tone Ponds Concept Plan
www.hesch.com
-
-
-
Lli)I:H
-
- LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 13400 15TH AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55441 612/559-1423 FAX: 612/559-2202
February 15, 2003
Mr. Ross Fairbrother
Anderson Engineering
13400 15th Avenue North, Suite B
Plymouth, MN 55441
.
RE: Proposal for Additional Environmental Activities at Capestone Ponds Project, 20755 Manor
Road, Shorewood, MN (the Property).
Dear Ross:
.
As you requested, Liesch Associates, Inc. (Liesch) has prepared this proposal for additional
environmental investigations, regulatory interaction and further project correspondences. The
additional activities are proposed to further assess areas of identified soil contamination. This
investigation is anticipated to provide further assessment. of the areas of identified soil
contamination at the Property and the possible presence of additional near surface soil impacts from
the extended storage of automobiles. Liesch proposes reporting the release of known petroleum
contamination, identified during completion of soil sampling of seven soil borings completed on
the Property January 2 and 3, 2003, to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and
enrolling Capestone into the MPCA's Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) and Voluntary
Petroleum Investigation and Cleanup (VPIC) programs. Based.the intended use of the Property as a
residential development, Liesch recommends MPCA review and approval of all proposed actions at
the Property. Liesch proposes the following activities at the Property:
Release Reporting and MPCA Correspondence
. Liesch will report the identified soil and . groundwater release to the MPCA upon
authorization of the Property owner.
. Liesch will prepare a VICNPIC Application to enroll Capestone into the MPCA's
VICNPIC programs.
. Liesch will prepare a Work Plan and Proposed Actions Letter, to be submitted for MPCA
approval, outlining the implementation of the Test Pit Soil Contamination Delineation, as
outlined below and Capestone's future intended usage of the Property.
. Liesch will coordinate and attend a meeting with the MPCA to discuss future development
plans with MPCA staff.
Test Pit Soil Contamination Assessment
. Liesch will retain an excavation firm to advance fifteen test pits on the Property in locations
where the storage of autos and possible petroleum products has been noted. The test pits
will have nominal dimensions of3' x 8' x 5'. Exhibit B
PROPOSED ACTION
Environmental Process
. Liesch will screen test pits for the possible presence of impacts using visual-olfactory
methods and a 10.6 e V photoionization device.
. Liesch proposes to collect and submit for confirmation analysis up to fifteen soil samples
for diesel range organics (DRO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), priority pollutant
metals (PP metals) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs). Note that additional samples
and/or parameters may be deemed necessary (at additional cost) depending upon field
screening results. These additional parameters and/or sampling will not be added without
your permIssIon.
. Liesch will prepare a report summarizing the findings of the investigation presenting
recommendations for further action, if necessary.
Response Action Plan Opinion of Expected Cost
. Liesch will prepare an opinion of expected cost to address identified impacts based upon the
proposed development of the Property, the findings of the investigations completed to date
and discussions with MPCA staff.
.
Environmental Grants and Potential Funding Search .
. Liesch will assess the availability of grant programs at various agencies for the cleanup
work that will be required at the Property. This proposal does not include the cost of
preparing any applications for such grant programs. Please note that most grant programs
require the participation of the local unit of government.
A breakdown of expected costs has been attached. Liesch will only conduct the work necessary to
complete the work above and will notify you immediately of changes. If additional work is required
for the Test Pit Soil Contamination Assessment, based on MPCA review of the Work Plan, to be
submitted for MPCA approval, Liesch will revise this opinion of expected costs to reflect any
MPCA requests regarding the work plan. Please note that this proposal does not include costs for
response actions which may be required as the result of the impacts present and the proposed
development of the Property.
.
This proposal is limited to performance of the defined services for your exclusive use. Reliance
upon the final work product shall be limited to you or other specified parties so designated in the
final report. Reliance letters to other parties shall be prepared by Liesch upon mutual agreement at
an additional cost in accordance with Liesch's standard fee schedule. Also, the proposal and
opinion of expected cost are subject to revision should the services be redefined or should
additional services or alternative reports be requested.
To indicate your acceptance of this proposal and the General Conditions attached and made a part
oftrus agreement, please sign below.
THE LIESCH COMPANIES
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MADISON, WI
SCOTTSDALE. AZ
.
.
Thank you for calling and giving us the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Accepted by:
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
~A~.
Dan~e C
Principal ~
on behalf of Capestone Builders
Date
Attachment
w:\sa\62000 13\proposals\additional phase twoO 131 03.doc
THE LIESCH COMPANIES
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MADISON, WI
sconSDALE. AZ
I-
If.
II.
II.
iI~
II:
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
.
II
LIMITED PHASE TWO
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
CARMICHIEL'S AUTO SALVAGE
20755 MANOR ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
Prepared for:
CAPESTONE BUILDERS
4109 ECKERT A VENUE SE
DELANO, MINNESOTA 55441
January, 2003
Prepared by:
Liesch Companies
. Minneapolis, MN . Madison, WI · Scottsdale, AZ
Exhibit C
PHASE II STUDY-EXCERPT
I'
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Privileged and Confidential
LIMITED PHASE TWO
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESS:MENT
CARMICIDEL'S AUTO SALVAGE
20755 MANOR ROAD
SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331
Prepared for:
CAPESTONE BUILDERS
4109 ECKERT AVENUE SE
DELANO, l\1N 55328
Prepared by:
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
13400 15TH AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
(763) 489-3100
JANUARY 31, 2003
PROJECT NUMBER: 6200013.01
This report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision.
~
. /0
:' ..-;.--....
,.,/ .--- --------.
Ah -n enker
Project Manager
~
I'
I
I
I
I
I
~
II
I
-
t.
III
II
II
-
I
-
i
Privileged and Confidential
1.0
INTRODUCTION
lie$ch Associates, Inc. (Liesch) was retained by Capestone Builders (Capestone), to conduct a
limited Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (Limited Phase Two ESA) for a parcel of
land currently owned and occupied by Carmichiel's Auto Salvage located at 20755 Manor Road,
Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the Property). The Property is located in the
southwest 1,4 of the southwe~t IAof Section 25, Township 117 North, Range 23 West. Figure 1 in
Appendix A illustrates the location of the Property.
The Property consists of approximately 11.1 acres of land occupied by an auto salvage yard.
Several structures exist on the Property including an Office Building constructed in
approximately 1990; a Pole Shed constructed in approximately 1980 and used for tear down of
cars; a steel Storage Shed used to store engines; a small Steel Shed used for storage of pails of
used oil and gasoline; a fallen house and foundation; and a concrete Block Structure used for
storage of auto parts. Other structures at the Property include several semi-trailers and trailer
boxes used for storage of auto parts, lean-to structures used for storage of auto parts and large
battery boxes used for storage of used batteries. Liesch also noted a wetland on the southwest
comer of the Property. The Property has been used as an auto salvage yard since 1955. Prior to
use as an auto salvage the Property was used as a gravel pit. Currently the Property includes the
above mentioned buildings and structures, the wetland, car bodies and automotive parts. The
majority of the Property is covered with trees. Figure 2 in Appendix A is a Property Layout Map
depicting the vicinity of the Property.
The Property is located in a predominantly residential area of Shorewood. Surrounding land use
is as follows: Manor Road exists immediately adjacent to the Property to the west and north-west
with residential homes beyond; residential homes exist to the northeast of the Property; and State
Highway 7 exists to the south, with residential homes beyond.
liesch understands that the Property is to be acquired by Capestone Builders for redevelopment
as residential homes.
2.0 BACKGROUND
Liesch prepared a report for Capestone entitled: Phase One Environmental Site Assessment for the
Property, dated December 20, 2002 (Liesch 2002 ESA). During Liesch's investigation for the
Liesch 2002 ESA the following recognized environmental conditions were identified and
subsequently referenced in the Liesch 2002 ESA:
February 2003
'Pagel'
LIESCH ASSOClA TES, INC.
Hydrogeo1oglsts . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I-
I"
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
l-
I
I
I
I
~
~
I
Privileged and Confidential
. The Property has been operated as an automotive salvage yard since approximately 1955.
Auto parts observed on the Property il).clude, but are not limited to, the following:
automotive gasoline tanks, tires, steel and iron springs and suspension parts, used
batteries, car body parts, engines and associated parts. Auto parts were observed in piles
placed directly on the ground and scattered throughout the Property. Several storage
structures, which include semi trailer boxes, trailer boxes and lean-to structures exist in
the approximate center of the Property near the Office Building and the Pole Shed used
for tear-down. Three large covered battery boxes also exist on the Property. The boxes
store used automotive batteries. Batteries were also observed scattered on the Property.
Areas containing car bodies, auto pmt storage structures or auto parts, placed directly on
the ground, exhibited visual surficial staining. Due to the fact that soils were not visible
beneath storage piles of auto parts, auto part storage structures and car bodies, Liesch
believes that more extensive soil staining and impacts exist beneath these piles based on
the nature of storage and Liesch's past experience with similar facilities. Liesch
recommends a subsurface assessment be conducted on the Property to assess for the
possible presence of impacts. Please note that further action may be necessary depending
upon the results of the investigation and intended use of the Property. Also, any impacted
soils and/or groundwater will need to be properly managed for any redevelopment.
. Several pails of used gasoline, oils and antifreeze were observed during the walkover
survey. Some of the pails were not covered, but were located in the small Steel Shed.
Liesch recommends a subsurface assessment be conducted on the Property to assess for
the possible presence of impacts.
The following items of environmental note were identified for the Property during the Liesch
2001 ESA:
. Liesch did not observe evidence of underground storage tanks (USTs) such as fill pipes or
vent pipes during the walkover survey. However, it should be noted that scrap metal and
automotive parts were piled along many of the buildings and structures that obstructed
Liesch's view for evidence ofUSTs. Mr. Carmichiel stated that USTs do not exist on the
Property. Liesch observed five aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) some of which contain
fluids. The ASTs were located near the Office Building and the Pole Shed. A 265-gallon
AST containing used oil was observed inside the Pole Shed. The ASTs should be emptied
and properly disposed of.
February 1003
.PageZ'
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers . Environmental Scientists
I. .
t .
i
~
,
~.
~
t'
~
~
I
~
II
III
III
Ii
Ii
.
Privileged and Confidential
. Automotive fluids are stored and used on the Property. Fluids include gasoline, new and
used motor oil, new and used antifreeze, automotive lubricants and automotive solvents
stored in aerosol spray cans. Several 55-gallon storage barrels exist on the Property and
include the following: two 55-gallon barrels containing recycled antifreeze; one 55-gallon
barrel of used oil; and two 55-gallon barrels of new oil. All petroleum products and
hazardous chemicals should be properly characterized and disposed of.
. Several canisters of compressed liquid petroleum gas were observed scattered near the
Pole Shed. The LP container should be properly disposed of.
. Suspect asbestos containing material (ACM) observed on the Property included
sheetrock/taping compound, floor coverings and shingles. The suspect ACM materials
appeared to be in a not damaged condition. No samples were collected to determine the
asbestos content of any of the above. materials. Prior to demolition, Federal and State
regulations require that suspect ACM be identified and properly managed in accordance
with current regulations.
. Liesch observed an old foundation located on the northeast comer of the Property. Part of
a house structure had fallen into the foundation and wood, shingles and other house
building materials were observed in the foundation along with a stove and various
automotive parts. ACM may be present in the materials. Liesch recommends that the
material be characterized, excavated and disposed of.
. The Property was previously excavated as a gravel pit prior to 1955 when the auto
salvage started operation at the Property. Areas of excavated sands and gravel are evident
along the northeast and east Property boundaries. Steep banks of sand and gravel have
been exposed in these areas. No readily apparent areas of imported soil fill were observed
during the walkover survey. Furthermore, Mr. Carmichiel stated that his father worked
for the gravel pit prior to his acquisition of the Property and he was not aware of soil
importing to the Property.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Based upon the conditions noted above, Liesch completed the following as part of this Limited
Phase Two ESA:
. Pale 3'
February Z003
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrolleologists . Engineers' Environmental ScIentists
_.
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
Privileged and Confidential
. Liesch observed the advancement of seven ~ollow stem auger soil borings at the Property.
The soil borings were completed in conjunction with a geotechnical investigation.
. Soil borings were screened for the possible presence of contaminants using visual,
olfactory observations and using a photoionization detector (Pill) equipped with a 10.6
electron volt lamp.
. Soil samples were collected from each boring for laboratory analysis at depths that
exhibited the highest measurable Pill reading or at the terminus. of each soil boring.
. Groundwater samples were collected from three of the seven borings.
. Submittal of this report summarizing the factual findings of the assessment including
recommendations for further action, if necessary.
4.0 PHASE TWO ASSESSMENT
This Limited Phase Two ESA consisted of the installation of seven environmental soil borings
(B-1, B-2, B-4, B-5, B-6, B-7 and B-15) using a hollow stem auger drill rig. Liesch
representatives, Mr. Aaron Benker, was onsite January, 2 2003 and Mr. Bryan Hassing was
on site January 3, 2003 to oversee the drilling activities, field screen soils and collect all
laboratory soil andlor groundwater samples.
4.1 SOIL BORING INSTALLA nON
Boring B-1 was advanced on the western portion of the Property to the north of the wetland, to
assess soil and groundwater conditions in an anticipated down-gradient position to the majority
of the automotive tear-down and storage operations. Boring B-2 was advanced northwest of the
Office Building in the area of battery storage. Boring B-4 was advanced on the southeast portion
of the Property near tear-down areas and car storage areas. Boring B-5 was advanced adjacent to
the east of the Pole Shed, in areas of parts storage, AST storage and equipment tear down. Boring
B-6 was advanced adjacent to a pile of automotive gasoline tanks and in the vicinity of other
various parts piles. Boring B-7 was advanced on the northern portion of the Property in the area
of the auto salvage yard. B-15 was advanced adjacent to the west of the Office Building and
adjacent to the north of the wetland. Figure 2 in Appendix A depicts the location of the soil
borings and surface samples collected at the Property.
February 2003
. Page 4,
LIESCH ASSOClA TES, INC.
Hydrogeologlsts . Engineers' Enviroumental Scientists
I-
II
I
I
I
II
II
,
II
II
..,.
..
II
II
II
.
.
.
Privileged and Confidential
Soil samples were collected continuously to approximately 20 feet below grade (fbg), soil
samples were then collected at five-foot intervals to the terminus of the soil boring. Boring B-1
was completed to 35 fbg, B-2 was completed to 20 fbg, B-4 was completed to 20 fbg, B-5 was
completed to 35 fbg, B-6 was completed to 20 fbg, B-7 was completed to 20 fbg, and B-15 was
completed to 29 fbg.
All soil borings were completed by Braun Intertec (Braun) utilizing an all-terrain hollow ste~
auger drill rig to advance a 4-1/2 inch diameter auger to the terminus of each soil boring. Soil
samples were collected using a stainless steel split spoon sampling apparatus. All hollow stem
augers were steam cleaned and the split spoon sampling apparatus was hand washed using
alconox detergent and a deionized water rinse.
4.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Soil Screening
Soils encountered during the drilling activities were comprised of brown silty clay with areas of
sandy gravel on the northwest portion of the Property. Perched groundwater was encountered in a
poorly graded sand lense encountered in highly organic silty clays at approximately 19 fbg in
borings B-2, B-5 and B-15. The perched groundwater unit was encountered near the wetland and
is believed to be consistent with the wetland feature. The saturated unit appeared to be perched
water and is not anticipated to represent the shallow groundwater unit, which is anticipated
between 40-50 fbg. Copies of Liesch's soil boring logs are included as Appendix B.
Soil samples collected during the soil boring investigation were screened for the presence of
organic vapors. A Pill equipped with a 10.6 electron volt (e.V.) lamp was usedto screen soil
samples for the presence of organic vapors. The Pill was calibrated prior to mobilizing to the
Property. A quart-size polyethylene freezer bag was filled approximately V2 full of the sample to
be analyzed. Soil clumps were broken and the bag was shaken and the sample was allowed to
develop in a heated vehicle for approximately 10 minutes prior to screening with the Pill. Soil
field screening resulted in Pill detections ranging from non-detect to 27.6 parts per million
(ppm). Field screening results are included on boring logs included as Appendix B.
Soil and Groundwater Sample Collection
Selected soil samples exhibiting noticeable odor, visible soil staining or elevated Pill readings
were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. If no sign of contamination was present
during the boring, a sample from the terminus of the soil boring was collected for laboratory
analysis. Table 1 in Appendix C summarizes samples collected for laboratory analysis of soil
February 2003
.PageS.
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologlsts . Engineers' Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
-
I
III
.
.
.
II
.
.,
II
.
.
Privileged and Confidential
and groundwater during the Limited Phase Two ESA.
Soil samples were collected directly from the split spoon sampling apparatus retrieved by the
hollow stem auger drill rig. Soils were immediately containerized in laboratory provided sample
jars, labeled and placed in an ice-chilled cooler.
Groundwater was collected from temporary monitoring wells. Two-inch diameter PVC screen'
and riser was installed in borings B-2, B-5 and B-15. The screen was filled with a red-flint sand
pack to approximately two feet above the top of the screen. The wells were developed on the
same day as installation in order to remove auger cuttings. The wells were then purged prior to
, '
sampling. Wells B-2 and B-5 were allowed to equilibrate overnight prior to purging and
collecting laboratory samples. Boring B-15 was installed, developed, purged and sampled on the
same day. Liesch allowing sufficient time between d~velopment and purging the well to allow for
groundwater recharge.
After all samples were collected, the cooler was transported to Legend Technical Services
(Legend) MDH Lab Certification #027-123-295 under chain of custody control for laboratory
analysis. The samples were analyzed within appropriate holding times. A copy of Legend's
analytical report is included as Appendix D.
5.0 ASSESSMENT RESUL TS/FINDINGS
Soil Analytical Results
Soil samples were collected for analysis of diesel range organics (DRO), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals and Poly
Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). DRO was detected in B-4 (0-2.5') at 350 ppm, B-5 (0-2.5') at 28
ppm and B-6 (0-2.5') at 1,200 ppm. The DRO chromatogram indicates that the samples
contained compounds in the molecular weight that is usually associated with lubricating oils.
PCBs were detected in B-6 (0-2.5'), which includes ArocIor 1248 at 0.9 ppm and ArocIor 1260 at
0.8 ppm. RCRA metals detected in soil samples are summarized on Table 2 in Appendix C. All
RCRA metals were identified below Tier 1 Soil Reference Values (SRV). However, some of the
elevated RCRA metals may exceed hazardous waste disposal limits set for landfills disposal.
Further assessment by Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedures (TCLP) analysis would be
required to evaluate landfill acceptance for soil disposal approval for landfills. All soil sample
results are summarized in Table 2 in Appendix C.
February 2003
'Page6'
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
HydrogeoJoglsts . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
a
~..
.~..
~
II
~.
III
II
II
,
II.
II.
II.
II
III
III
.
Privileged and Confidential
Groundwater Results
Groundwater samples were collected for analysis of DRO, VOCs, dissolved RCRA metals and
PCBs from boring B-2, B-5 and B-15. DRO was detected in B-2 at 400 parts per billion (PPB),
B-5 at 330 ppb and B-15 at 140 ppb. The Minnesota Department of Health (J\.IDH) has
established a Health Based Value of 200 ppb for DRO in drinking water. 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
was detected in B-2 at 0.5 ppb and B-5 at 0.73 ppb. Acetone was detected in B-2 at 12 ppb and
B-5 at 10 ppb. Naphthalene was detected in B-2 at 2.4 ppb, B-5 at 1.6 ppb and B-15 at 0.53 ppb.
Barium was detected in B-2 at 0.28 ppb, B-5 at 0.15 ppb, B-15 .at 0.35 ppb. The detections of
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, acetone, naphthalene and barium were all below :MDH established.
Health Risk Limits (HRLs) established for drinking water. Groundwater analytical results are
summarized in Table 3 in Appendix C.
Summary of Results
Petroleum based contaminants were detected in surficial soil samples collected from B-4, B-5
and B-6 ~ollected in the vicinity of the Pole Shed in areas that have been used for equipment tear-
down and petroleum product storage. Petroleum contaminated soil requires special handling
during development activities and will require separation, encapsulation, or disposal prior to
development. The exact disposition of the impacted soils will be subject to MPCA approval prior
to development activities. PCBs detected in B-6 were detected at low-levels, but will require off-
site disposal owing to the nature of the contaminant and the fact that residential development has
been proposed for future Property usage.
Groundwater contaminants appear to be associated with petroleum products. The water
encountered during this Limited Phase Two ESA appears to be perched water and is not
anticipated to represent a resource drinking water aquifer. However, MPCA requirements require
that a groundwater receptor survey be conducted to identify drinking water wells within the
vicinity of the Property. Further groundwater monitoring may be required by the MPCA in order
to obtain "No Further Action" assurances from the MPCA.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Work performed for this Limited Phase Two ESA consisted of the completion of environmental
soil borings and collection of soil and groundwater laboratory samples.
Based upon the findings of this Limited Phase Two ESA, Liesch recommends the following
actions for the Property:
February 2003
'Page7'
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologlsls . Engineers' Environmental Scientists
-'
If'
II'
III
-,
III'.
II:
,
II.
II.
III,
III
III
II
II
.
.
Privileged and Confidential
. Liesch recommends reporting the detection of soil and groundwater contaminants to the
:tvIPCA state duty officer.
. Iiesch recommends enrolling Capestone in the :MPCA VIC and VPIC Programs to obtain
technical assistance and assurances for the future development of the Property.
. Iiesch recommends completing further assessment of the areas of soil contamination using
test pits to detennine the approximate extent of soil contamination.
. Iiesch recommends that further assessment of RCRA metal concentrations be conducted by
collecting a TCLP sample for RCRA metals to determine potential disposal options for the
material.
W:\sa\6200013\Limited Phase llESA.doc
February 2003
'Page8'
LIESCH ASSOClA TES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers . Enviroamenta1 Scientists
110"
,",.
II
III
III
II
III
III
III
III
--
--
II
II
.~
.e
.8
III
N
~
: --I
II;
!
lit
'<~__ \-~~~~~..~{J., WI((~~\\\\ J}~I ~!1?(d#,/~~~\b\1~
" ~// ~ Mj" \\\\\\~ I.~- ,--,-"..--..~,- ~\.~\\\\~~ ~
~ -. ~~p " .- - ~\\~"~
=01... . ',:~ 1 AI ":1 ~'\/; ~~~~
"", ~~ ,~ ~ V- d
.....~T..'..\~~\\\~ .~~ ~ ,Ifi Ir(Vffi~C'~. ~/~, r;;; ~ ~ ~
y 'I. ,w ~~(, ~-~
~ I ~~~ IN 17. IG~~:3
,. ~\\. ~y-;'~~ ;;
~~ ~,~ '\~ ~ '1 ~~ ~\ r;;;~ . I~ T(f!;,1
\'.: ,I' ' ..;., ~ ' ~ I, 'filii
\ ~ .' ~ ~
~ ~ " "'" ,~ '~""'" : ING~ ~ \ 1 :':i" BORlNGIfl I ~
~ ~ " 0 l, '~!L a-
I' ' ~ BORINGIS ~
I}~~ - 1 '~,~~fal
i~; \" ~~'''' I~~~ ~'~'~71 ~ .~
~ ~ ~ ~~ .. ~'I;,. rll( ~ \1'" ~
~
')j J ^' \ \' \ ~ _ . ~) ) ) Y'i' \. \ -' ~ !.--i" r;
~~. ~~:T \l~~~\ ~~ ~ ~~. ,~:' # I ~
\ .j ~':ii.l \ "~ (y ~ .?/,,~" ~ ~-%
, ~.... ~ \-l~ \\ - ,_ -?=-~\..... ~/~JfP
~ . I 1-\'- \- \ \' =J ..,.,1.,-.. ~ ............' · ~ ~
,~ ,,\ li ~ .-<~~'fI"!
. .. --I...... _ -/ --- ___- :Ill ::::---/--'
~\lt 'e:" "'- \ ~ .~ --d!!! Z /' ~ c:;
r~ ~ \~ ~"~..\ ~~-- 4r~
I ~ '- ~f 7 (
..J ~ ~ ..... .~ ( ~ ~
I .--~ ~~ ---- . '" NO~7 ~
~--::::..: ----- _ ~ suTE HlGfIWj"
.-4
~.
_v/': 7.#
" 3'"
~ ~~
--~ ~~\
-1 ~
..
,......
-
---
-....
LJESi8BYDBOWGISTS'INGDmIS'~ sammm
LEGEND
o MANHOLE
u POWER POLE
. ANCHOR
s TELEPHONE BOX
. MONITOR WELL
/). CULVERT
ee ELECTRIC METER
)[ K FENCE
-OVERHEAD WIRES
-.-SANITARY SEWER
. GAlE VALVE
III GAS MElER
. DENOlES SET IRON
. DENOlES FOUND IRON
N
w-Q-E
S
~ 50 100
~~~
SCI\l.E IN
150
I
FEET
Source:
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
1ll4ll0 16th ~VDlCI!: 1l0RTll stm'l!l B PLYKOUTlt
.' lIIl li6441 TEL ('753) 883-1084 Fa (753) 383-1089
CARMICHIEL'S AUTO SALVAGE
20755 MANOR ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MN
Jan 2003
--iii= - ~..: -W.t.=" PROPERlY LAYOUT and SOIL BORING LOCATION MAP FlG~RE
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park Commission
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
.
DATE:
7 March 2003
RE:
Capestone Ponds P.U.D. - Trail on Manor Road
FILE NO.:
405(03.01)
.
The City has received a development proposal for the property currently occupied by
Carmichael's Auto Salvage. The proposal is described in a staff report, dated 30 January
2003 (attached). Greenwood residents to the west of the subject property have suggested
that the City either require the developer to construct a trail or sidewalk along Manor
Road, or the City should use park dedication fees from the proj ect to assist Greenwood in
constructing such a trail. The Planning Commission has referred this issue to the Park
Commission for its recommendation, and it has been scheduled for discussion at your 11
March meeting.
With respect to the developer putting in the trail, it must be realized that the twinhome
units in the project will be oriented to Excelsior Boulevard. There is no proposed
pedestrian feature that would encourage the new residents to use Manor Road. It is also
difficult to require any developer to install off-site improvements.
As proposed the project will generate $36,000 in park dedication fees. Given the limited
financial resources of the park fund, there is some question as to using that money for a
trail that would be of little benefit to Shorewood residents. This is compounded by the
difficulty in locating a trail on Manor Road to begin with. The City Engineer has
examined this in the past and suggests that the terrain on Manor Road, especially on the
Shorewood side of the road, does not lend itself well to the construction of a trail. The
Engineer will elaborate on this at Tuesday night's meeting.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
n
\,.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator It 1\
March 20, 2003 vy
Joint Meetings with Advisory Commissions
.
The City Council gave high priority to meeting with the Park Commission and Planning Commission
fairly early in the year, in order to discuss each commission's 2003 work plan and other topics.
Staff liaisons have worked with the commissions to identify dates that would fit well with their
anticipated meeting workloads. At its meeting of March 11, the Park Commission suggested that
there be one joint meeting to include the Council and both advisory commissions.
The City Council should determine whether it wishes to meet with the commissions individually, all
together, or both. The following alternatives would appear to be feasible for April:
Tuesday, April 8
Planning Commission only
Tuesday, April 15
Planning Commission (6:00 p.m., with food; regular "business"
meeting of the month starts at 7 :00 p.m.)
-- andlor--
Park Commission at 7:15 p.m. (venue TBD),
-- or --
Planning Commission & Park Commission combined at 5:45 or
6:00 p.m. (with food)
.
Tuesday, April 22
Park & Planning Commission, either individually or combined
(neither commission has scheduled a meeting for that evening)
Start time(s) TBD
Citv Council Action:
The City Council should set the meeting date(s) to meet jointly with the Park Commission and
Planning Commission.
1t 1 A
n
'W.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ct>
March 20, 2003
Proposed Closure of Suburban Hennepin Courts
.
Hennepin County District Court is considering the closure of its suburban courts as a budget
management strategy. The District Court is facing revenue constraints on two fronts: immediately,
as it is funded by the County; and, beginning July 1, 2003, as all funding will become the
responsibility of the State of Minnesota.
SLMPD Chief Bryan Litsey and City Prosecutor Ken Potts. have alerted the City of their concerns.
Currently, the City's prosecutions are handled at the Court facilities at Ridgedale. This location is
convenient for SLMPD officers and the prosecutors, and reduces our costs for appearances at court.
Closure of the Ridgedale court would move cases to Minneapolis or Brookdale, with costs increasing
due to time of travel and delays in hearing cases due to the increased caseloads at those facilities.
Area prosecutors and police chiefs believe that it is important for the cities to express their concern
and disagreement with the possibility of closing suburban courts. They have provided a model
. resolution to adopt and forward to State and County officials.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
A resolution stating opposition to closure of suburban court facilities has been prepared for
Council's consideration.
-ff.
76
n
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 03 -
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE CLOSURE
OF ANY SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COURT FACILITY
AND REQUESTING THE HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT TO WORK COOPERATIVELY
IN DESIGNING POSSIBLE RESPONSES TO STATE FUNDING REDUCTIONS
WHEREAS, at a February 2003 meeting of the Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee (CJCC),
the Hennepin County District Court Administrator announced that the District Court was considering
closing one or more suburban courthouses in response to proposed State funding decreases; and .
WHEREAS, the Court Administrator had budgetary or statistical information that he declined to
share at that meeting as it was only in draft form; and
WHEREAS, at no time has the Hennepin County District Court involved suburban cities in a
cooperative effort to analyze possible measures to accommodate the anticipated budget reductions;
and
WHEREAS, the closing of one or more of the suburban courthouses will result in the following:
. Much longer court calendars and overcrowding at the remaining courthouses, which do not
have the space to absorb additional defendants and the court staff needed for the increased
workload,
.
Police officers will be away from their jurisdictions for longer periods oftime to travel longer
distances and to wait for cases to be heard due to overcrowded court schedules,
.
. Suburban police departments will incur increased costs to pay for longer travel and waiting
times, and for additional officers to cover the longer absences,
. Suburban residents will suffer major inconvenience from traveling longer distances and
waiting longer periods of time to be heard,
. Cooperation of civilian witnesses and crime victims with the prosecution will be lost,
particularly in domestic abuse cases, due to the remote location and increased waiting time,
and
. Prosecution costs potentially will increase if each city's cases are spread between more
courtrooms; and
.I
.
.
2
WHEREAS, suburban municipalities recognize the real need to accommodate revenue reductions at
the District Court level; and
WHEREAS, suburban municipalities are themselves struggling with proposed reductions in their
own State funding; and
WHEREAS, suburban municipalities wish to cooperate with the Hennepin County District Court in
analyzing other alternatives that could avoid shifting the cost effects of the Court's budget revisions
to the cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shore wood,
Minnesota, that:
1. The City Council opposes the closure of any suburban courthouse because of the
consequences listed above.
2. Hennepin County District Court officials are requested to provide immediately accurate and
statistical information to the suburban cities, and to meet in cooperation with their
representatives to examine possible responses to the proposed funding reductions.
3. The City Administrator, City Prosecutor, and Chief of the South Lake Minnetonka Police
Department are authorized to cooperate with other suburban municipalities in creating a task
force of representatives to meet with the District Court.
Adopted March 24, 2003
Woody Love, Mayor
Attest:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRYAN T. LITSEY
Chief of Police
\.
810 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-1913
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
MEMORANDUM
TO: Craig Dawson, Shorewood City Administrator
FROM:
Bryan Litsey, ChiefofPolice
.
DATE:
RE: Proposed Closure of Suburban Satellite Courts
I have enclosed a letter fromJ.>rosecutqrI<ennethPotts along with a sample resolution in
opposition to the closure ofsuburba.tls~tellitecolU'tslnHenn.~pin County as a cost
savings measure. I have als()enclos.~dacopy()fareq~ntarticle that appeared in the Star
Tribune concerning this ma~~r. . .
.-'. . ' . : - .-~ ' ," .. ,,:: ',-"
.' '. :.. " "
This is an attempt by HennepinCounty.I.)istrict Court to reduce their budget at the
expense of local municipalities.A~articuJ~te~intheresolution, there will be grievous
consequences if this proposal is allowed to go through~ .
I would appreciate the support oftheShore'Y~Q<lCity Council in adopting the enclosed
resolution and forwarding certified copiesasr~commended in the enclosed letter from
Prosecutor Potts. I have asked the other member cities of Excelsior, Greenwood and
Tonka Bay to do likewise.
As always, please give me a call if you have any comments and/or questions concerning
this correspondence.
copy to: Woody Love, Shorewood Mayor
Serving the South Lake Mlnnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay
.;"
.
.
KENNETH N. POTTS, P.A.
Attorney at Law
5101 Thimsen Avenue
Suite 200
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345
TELEPHONE (952) 474-4240
TELECOPIER (952) 474-0987
March 3,2003
VIA FAX ONLY
Chief Bryan Litsey
South Lake Minnetonka Police Department
810 Excelsior Boulevard
Excelsior, MN 55331
Re: Closing Ridgedale
Dear Chief Litsey
Enclosed please find the Resolution in regard to the closing of the suburban
courts. The Resolution accurately addresses all the concerns that I would have in that the
costs of prosecution would go up dramatically. Judge Burke is attempting to have the
cities absorb the court's budget cuts.
As you know each suburban court previously had two judges to handle the
calendars. Last year Judge Burke decided he would only send one judge to Ridgedale
and also demanded that prosecutors allow hearing officers to hear certain petty
misdemeanor and misdemeanor driving offenses. Most of the prosecutors at Ridgedale
reluctantly agreed to his demands. Judge Burke also instituted a policy at Ridgeda1e
requiring jury trial appearances at 1 :30 rather than at 8:30. All of these measures have
increased the number of hours I spend at court. Court trials are heard much later in the
day because of the clogged calendars requiring your officers to spend 2-4 hours at court.
Closing the court and requiring us to relocate to Brookdale or Minneapolis would
raise these costs exponentially.
Time is of the essence. If the council is not meeting in the next one to two weeks
please have the mayor write a letter addressing the same issues raised in the resolution.
A certified copy of the Resolution or the mayor's letter should be sent to:
Chief Justice Kathleen Blatz
Minnesota Supreme Court
Minnesota Judicial Center
25 Rev Dr. Martin Luther King Jr Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
~,
Page 2
Chief Litsey
Chief Judge Kevin Burke
Hennepin County District Court
Hennepin County Government Center
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Sandy Vargas
County Administrator
Hennepin County Government Center
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
.
Mark Thompson
Court Administrator
Hennepin County District Court
Hennepin County Government Center
300 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Thanks for your efforts.
~/ilI;J
Kenneth N. Potts
.
KNP/sb
....
..
.
.
.L .L.L.L.LL'-.L V"'.L':UV.L.L. "'UAA v... "'......, o.U.L.L5 P<U.U'" LV ......"'U.ll"'pU.L "'VY.L""
... "'6"" ..L V.I. ~
startribune.com
Close window
Talk of cuts bring panic to Hennepin courts
Her6n Marquez Estrada
Star Tribune
Published 03/08/2003
Arrest warrants are being issued erroneously. Defendants and witnesses are being sent to the wrong
courtrooms. Court cases are recorded as "dismissed" instead of being scheduled for trial.
Heavy workloads at Hennepin County's suburban courthouses, in Edina, Minnetonka and Brooklyn
Center, are. blamed by some officials for increasingly common mistakes. And concerns are being raised
that it could get worse as the courts face a possible $7 million budget shortfall.
Hennepin County's three satellite courthouses handle about 40,000 cases a year. One proposal being
considered to deal with the shortfall is to close one satellite courthouse and to shift the work to the other
two.
That has sounded alarm bells in the suburbs, where some officials fear that increasing the workload will
only exacerbate the problems.
"You overwhelm the staff, and mistakes start happening," said Sandra Johnson, associate city attorney
of Bloomington. "Those things are happening too often already."
Johnson, who said she has been sent to the wrong courtroom and has had cases erroneously marked as
dismissed, detailed her concerns in a memo for the Bloomington City Council.
The council used her memo as the basis of a resolution opposing the possible closure of a satellite
courthouse. The council passed the resolution this week.
John Gunyou, Minnetonka's city manager, said he has written to Chief Judge Kevin Burke asking that
alternate cost--cutting measures be considered because of the effect closing a courthouse would have on
the suburban judicial systems.
"The most frustrating thing in this whole process is that Judge Burke has not involved the cities in any of
this," Gunyou said Friday. "It's all being done kind of behind closed doors."
The memos, letters and resolutions drafted by municipalities have angered Burke, who said suburban
leaders are jumping the gun with their objections.
Burke noted that nothing has been decided, because it will probably be May before the District Court
has a sense of how much it will have to cut.
Also, he said, the court has a responsibility to come up with best-and worst-case scenarios for judges
and court administrators to consider when deciding how to meet the shortfall.
"What did they think we were going to do?" Burke said of suburban administrators. "It would be
completely irresponsible not to think about [alternatives]. This is an alternative."
If a satellite courthouse is not closed, he said, then it might mean that Hennepin County could follow
http://www.startribune.com/viewers/story .php?template=print_ a&story=3741881 3/17/2003
Oregon's example and operate courts only four days week. Or, he said, courts could become more
selective and choose, for example, not to prosecute juveniles for such offenses as drinking.
.
...
4'
Burke would prefer to not close any facility, he said. But if forced to choose, he probably would close
Ridgedale in Minnetonka because Southdale and the Brookdale courthouse, which is being refurbished,
would be better able to absorb increased workloads.
'This is going to be bad'
Hennepin County District Court is the largest in the state, with 61 judges, 17 referees and more than 600
employees. Burke said 90 percent of its budget goes to personnel.
The court system has been under a hiring freeze since last year, so no additional personnel will be added
to alleviate the crisis.
That is what concerns suburban jurisdictions. In 2002, the Southdale courthouse in Edina handled more
than 16,000 cases while Ridgedale and Brookdale, in Brooklyn Center, handled about 12,000 each.
Burke said the Ridgedale cases would be split between Southdale and Brookdale.
.
"It just doesn't make a lot of sense to us," said Gunyou ofMinnetonka. "They're just going to overburden
the others."
Johnson, the associate Bloomington city attorney, said there is already a three-week backlog in updating
records and in opening and processing mail in the Southdale courthouse. The result: delays in recording
fine payments, guilty pleas, lawyers waiving fIrst appearances and requests for continuances.
She said her office is coming across instances where traffic fines have been paid by mail, but the
payment was not recorded for weeks so arrest warrants were issued.
When police stop the motorist again, an outstanding warrant is found, which leaves drivers in the
unenviable position of trying to explain that there has been a computer error.
"We now believe them more than the computers," Johnson said.
.
The erroneous arrest warrants are on top of what Johnson terms "bad updates" to files as clerks make
entry errors while working too fast.
"Some cases that are supposed to be scheduled for jury trial have been mistakenly updated as
dismissed," Johnson wrote. "Defendants are given a notice of the time and place of their next court
appearance that is different from court records, so that the court, prosecutor and state witnesses are in
one courtroom. . . and the defendant is at another location."
Burke acknowledged the existence of such problems and the possibility they will get worse. But, he
said, the looming shortfall leaves no good options.
"We're going to have to downsize the justice system," he said. "This is going to be bad."
- Heron Marquez Estrada is at hme@startribune.com.
@ Copyright 2003 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
http://www.startribune.comlviewers/story.php?template=prinC a&story=3741881
3/17/2003
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works JIV'
TO:
.
DATE:
March 20, 2003
RE:
Smithtown Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Engineering File 01-12
At the March 10th City Council meeting, the City Council directed Staff to provide an update at the
following Council meeting with regard to the right of way process, and to provide a description or
graphics demonstrating the impacts to properties along Smithtown Road. In addition, information
regarding the decision to place the walkway along the north side of Smithtown is also provided in this
report.
Easement Progress and Update
.
Discussion of easements and construction impacts have focused on 14 properties on the north side of
Smithtown Road, west of the Hennepin County Regional Trail (LRT). This, due to the decision made
to place the S.O-foot walkway along the north side of Smithtown Road, west of the LRT. Attachment 1
is the right of way study completed early in the process that depicts where the City has a dedicated
right of way or easement in favor of the City. Attachment 2 indicates the 14 parcels that require an
easement for construction of the planned walkway.
With the assistance of WSB and Associates, Staff has met or received clear feedback bye-mail or
discussion from all 14 owners where easements were needed. Of the 14 subject properties, only two
owners have indicated a willingness to sign an easement agreement, with one stating that this was
contingent upon what the entire neighborhood desired.
Roadway Widths and Impacts
The existing pavement width, from centerline to edge of bituminous, was measured along portions of
Smithtown Road. While not intended to be a substitute for actual survey data, the measurements taken
will assist in discussion of the perceived impacts of the pavement construction.
n
\,~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
"
Mayor and City Council
Smithtown Road Discussion
March 20, 2003
Page 2 of 3
Attachment 3 is a table of existing pavement widths from centerline, versus the planned roadway
section. Please bear in mind that the existing pavement widths were measured in what was perceived
to be a uniform section and not in front of each individual lot. This is not meant to replace the actual
survey data obtained. Therefore, minor deviations in width may be present.
.
Attachment 4 is a graphic that demonstrates the cross section of the roadway and walkway that is being
considered at this time. Existing Smithtown Road varies in width from 22.D to 30 feet in width, versus
the proposed roadway section consists of two II-foot driving lanes, one 4-foot shoulder on the south
side of Smithtown Road, and one 2-foot shoulder on the north side of Smithtown Road. In addition, a
S.D-foot boulevard and S foot concrete walk is planned for the north side of Smithtown Road, west of
the LRT. Minor grading beyond the edge of walk will be necessitated for final grading and to restore
sod areas.
WSB and Associates is in the process of moving the walkway as close to the roadway as practical.
Staff has directed Mr. Dave Hutton, of WSB, to keep a minimum S.D-foot boulevard between the
walkway and edge of shoulder to facilitate placement of signs, mailboxes, drainage, and area for snow
storage. There are areas where this may deviate to avoid impact to mature trees or features.
Impacts to Wetlands
It should also be noted that if the walkway portion of the project proceeds, there would be 3,482 square
feet of wetland impact. According to the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) the City would be
responsible for mitigating this by creating a wetland within the City, two times the area impacted. This
site would have to be determined and incorporated into the plan set.
.
Supporting Evidence for Walkway Location
The question has been asked regarding the decision to locate the walkway on the north side of
Smithtown, versus the South side of Smithtown Road. Staff offers the following comments:
. Locating the walk on the north side minimized the impacts to significant trees.
. Minnewashta School is located on the north side of Smithtown Road.
. It was preferable to keep the walk on one side of the road to avoid the need to cross Smithtown
Road. This is critical in the higher speed areas, west of Minnewashta School.
. Significant drainage problems along the south side of Smithtown Road forced the trail to the north
side. It would be very difficult to fit a ditch, walk, and boulevard separation, even in a full 33-foot
right of way.
.
.
"
Mayor and City Council
Smithtown Road Discussion
March 20, 2003
Page 3 of 3
Alternatives and Recommendation
The City Council has directed that the walkway be incorporated into the design of the project on the
north side of Smithtown Road from the LRT west to the Victoria City border. Currently, it does not
appear that the 12 of the key parcel owners appear willing to sign easement agreements.
If the City Council determines that the easements are to be acquired, it is estimated that the land costs
would be approximately $50,000 with an additional $50,000 of legal and administrative costs. These
estimates are preliminary in nature and would have to be researched further prior to seeking any action.
As stated above, the design is currently based upon inclusion of the walkway on the north side of
Smithtown Road, west of the LRT. If the City Council determines that this is not desirable, a motion
providing an alternative direction would be appropriate.
.
.
J'
Smithtown Road
Improvements
Right of Way Strip Map
/ {"'~ :-'" J.\ \1.' \""
l._\ \ \ <,~,)"",..::::
\ !-' DC \~:~' ,{~~,. ..
c
'"
~
:;;
~
"
~
..,
"
,,-
N
'"
..
,..
o
~
\.-
o
100
I
200
~
I~ ~ "d-=
! i............ -"'\~., ~
v
rrIj
,r 10 ~ --..
'iJ ~ /:/:;:4"---1 \:-~ r:;.,'
.. < }(( r-)/~ \.._...", ,,~~).,
/' ~"~~)~~~;.'~- ".
'"
'--
~
I
~
."-.......,., ..,tl
/ t,
(. ~-,;-
.~''"'.-............... ...
"
~
~
..
,
I'
J
tJ()! j c::'~,/
, }-e-;~r~ 0
g e i ,f ~ :.-.
0:'. ~4' .~
;~'~('''''''''~~:;~'''-~,,~~
''''''~':-:-:~i -""'. f
e r ! f i.
v,. . "1 r i j !
;J F
Ii I:...... .~....
.
~
~
"
,--,,!-
).(~\
t \\
\.\ "\.
~;.. \ ~-i
".. ....':.,.
~ '
:; 't
\ 'X.
\\ \t.
)...1\ ",
\ \. '\~.
:-..io \ \:
!~ \ \,
. ',\" '\
~'\. \ \.
~ ),\\"
"/l.l
..
"
).".....~~..............--......,-_..--"......--..,
i.' ... '\
! ,
~ \
"_~"_~.".".".., . r-~'~)
~ ~\.)
~
...
..
~
..
~
0.0
eO
.f?
~.., ~'
~
~
;._ . _. ::,!:-~.--:.:-:<~,~:-_",=:..r"':~:::' ::::.:'-"y.:;::;r......,
.(' ~~I"';;-,,, /'. \ ~
. ......... ..."....,..-, -::u.:::.
"<'r"j '\ :-:-/ ,
"""; ,'.*i:....
.~:
\..~.~
~~\ ...
~,
\\
\\ " ~
'\<:;-",..- ",
-....~..w
.;'\~
~
~
.~
,."
....~, .
, '\..
"'~
,.,.
'''-
.,;.......
.!"'~...~.,..,."'
.~l.:"'-"'" .~
\f\
.,
[On~J;:rrl
~
- - '. I .
..,.........--............"'i,.;..........-.--.......'"
! ,...-...-.... \
.>
~..-" ...)....-.:/"
'\Q
~~.............
.N ..-.."
I " '.
~.. \.
\-..,.....~. ... .-:'....,....,
," '\ "-.. .~
..- ~..'""=\....:~::.;;,~
r..........---~\
.., ,~
t 'J ~:. <,:~~~;.
\~j,:':_"
Street Easement
;If
oil;'
~Ii
a I;
; ~
1 ~
>
"
.... ,. ;
. . .
.f hereby cenify that this plan or report was prepared by me
;or under my direct supervision and that! am a duly.Ri:gistcrec
~::::tI.aU~MiMeso~
STEVENV.ISCHE
DATE 1/25100 REG. NO. 22703
ATTACHMENT 1
_=:;i ,"~:::~:>-./_..<~...:~ 1
:; o....~~":: .....9:J ~ ~ r
" Q'::<~., '::::~_: ~I
:J''j ;; -
.;JY-
. / ;_J'J"
""
-....-.....;. ~
City Ownership
Existing Right Of Way
l ~
il
'r
..
:....:~....,....,.,~...;..-.;::.....oyQ.,;~~~..Ji('V.':'C.....~....-::- :J- ...j
'~i --
'1 ..' ~- .-...... .....
.....,,;. ~"" \.....-. -;;~
.. "............ :' ~ c
t"-="';:"'~
.~ '. I
. ~ i')
\ /~l'
.....-
., ".:
.
WSB
350 We$twood Lake O1Ilce
8441 Wayzata IlouIevard
Minneapolis, /tiN 55426
'"
:~._-_..-
. "
!)
a,j
r-:
'-.
..
, w
112.541_
4"..-.. JIIC. FAX 541-1700
INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEeRS . PlANNERS
.. "'4,' ~ I
l.-'m'"i('li '" II
(::, ","~~~:, 11"
,/ ) c .'_ '-'~.'"
.1 "
.....j . ~l 'l ./
_....~-- ._~-..~...-
...-----::::.::.::--==:::-...::::::: _._~--....,
. ,r <.,)
~~-l ~,.1
\ t' ~::::- r-i
". --..~--~,.~.., .......--~. L..
or _.~.v...."""_..._..~.:.~.-, /.:
.. ({ '..J., l
. "'00--'1 I
.~.......- ,1.
""""'""'l ~ I
,...'>...,.. .......::;"1 i
~~~"., / 'r ~ ./ t
J. 1-.'" 1
.........,..,,)/(:. :
"
f Ii
!\
; ,
...,.....,0. ~
"
r; /.'
,-; 'a c.....~ IfI:.
_..{}._....~ ,,;
lYl \r~Q
',.- ...:.~;.~,.~o. I
......M.._.M__.!-:...
".~:'I.. u.
-. '-'.~'
";>...
..
.1
.~
~
~ ~
~~f"\
~ ~.~
~~t:
=::~~
~~~
.s~~
..;:~
.~ ~~
~~~
.~
~
~~
t-.~:=.\~~LJ
'.t
n
""1 J
l.-'.~~ ./
,..?-{..........'\
. \ "'.
~", ..t;"'\\,,~)
"
(l
(in
<:>
')
,.
./".' ; """"] 0
'.. ":1-[ 0
":""-1) ,
..,.<- <~.. ""'l ....J I
! {;-~:::::.!;;:~:::"=::;=:::;::;J
c,
<,
("
U
('"""')
,.
,/)
'> '.';,~'j
"'./
t 1 ..._.,
:1 <> \~ 1..]"',.
.~ !;? ..._~..-\ r ()
I.,. , -~--L..J " ."..""""" ..,~"..,....~.__......__. w....,...,,^~-'Q , "
~\ \"" "'-' " I
,,'- . '-"'- ~.'" .'. Ur~:'I' "", .
'/0"---0:, I) r . u ')
Q/ \.....r-~' ! \.
"':::::~~-'~ll.1 I i ~ t'\
""-I --.- [~]) i L.....c1 J /
"~')_.v... ..v.......~.. ,,~... I h . ,f
..,.~--''''..'-
.....,....'........- ',.
,;--..... ,..\,~.
""" t' "
l~-.'~ ..
· .."....;....-.., ri
-~..............................,...~~~.::::-.:':'l.
..~.~.*.~_.~_..
<I
~.
n
() t ~~~~~ii:~~t.i:i.~.f ......::T...".~~..~_. : >:.:...........~'\
c" \.i{,. ,i~..;......,,,.,.I::;.: ...... '1
~;,.~"."',,' .......-::;>''r--......" \'~., ... ;.r-
'\.o~." . ~ _..~:.~..;(/. \ . "'-~..,:
I'~':; :-.--- \ "'~"'" f~
t, . ......1 .n ".,.,;. $\ I"~
~... . ,..............~/.. .,~....
...,. ~,.. -----,..- , r
. .~'<' ~ "r.
I~' r" J.'<
. ;,t /
iij f
f''' .
) n
i.,,;) H
\...... ' , , ,
/) t 11 j
k'v' ! n 'r,~j
I ,/,,~ '1 fl. \
I, ), ~~, ! !r!_c=1 (
" /"..t '..........-...--1 'Jt
\ ./ ,-,<, \ i: I
. ~, )
(~ : \, 'c32,c=:::::=::'-"'c
. ':::'::'::::::::>:r'~-~2(~I ..,.~!~~~.._~:
.> ) ... . ~'i) . /""~'"
t ~ A.~-9.""-'. . ..,
\') '. ....... <l i ,/
CC.fJni )'"
;. .f'........"'........
\,i
.)
'1
r,
.,
}
I,
'\
., i
t"
i,
i \
I)
r"
<:l n
.., ':'I
~ .)
~
<l
" "
.,
~
-t
~
.1
~
.i
'1
~1
.:f
-t
.l
..,
~~
..1
.j
~
"1
-1
~
Q
..........-..
8
'"
o
o
1') fJ
o
~..:\~~~..~... "
......~
Il'......;.
t.{,
,
..-.1..... .......:.....
<-( iJ (
~ , 1 "
-: .~J
'.
.
o
'"
C] u
I,'
& j
! .J "1
f t \~~
La
"0
Q
'"
"
0:,
"
.1
~:;)
l'
;} 'J
..~ {)tH.. ~<:.'t
"'<>(
Q <l I
'.j "I
'\
\
/
.~
tl
.~,
';' ,>
Q \l
,>
'"
'b'.)
..., "
Q
[]
\)
t1
QtJ .....:.:: .:~,
() ...,
ti . ,_....:.:.......~:.:;., ,~i )
;,.;:........../'
! l'
Ii
i J
· t
....,..J 1
..-J_.,.,......v-,.....~_r(.. .
Q
~,'
<l
...............
1.'"
<.
Q
l}
.........v...... ...~..
.,......
. .."~.....M..l I
~ i
, J
',.'
<>
.,
<)
'.'
Q
\.:
1
t.\.......
~ I /
!\ II .r-"
a " J'
,. .ll;
t' I,.
!' l ,.
-' o:t
'-'
~'J
......' .h'~
t~ (...
~Jr-;~~] ,
\~II
tl ':) I 'l~ ~
"
"
,)
r,
.'
f
..:) i
".
t:,
"t
r:
~l~ H i
1!~z g ~
~I~ .~ m
is] ~
~tlI ffi
..,
~~ Iii
~
~
~
'CI
~
~
~
~
~
Q
:c:
lJ)
~
c:
~
a
~
(J
e
$:
'-t-
a
1::
tJ'\
Q:
tJ'\
c:
;:::
lJ)
.~
Lu
u p.~.1!'I!'1.~\.P~\~9.HOI\.1
\J......-
r~
L~
["]
\": t",
\)
t....
;~ } t..~..
'I I \.I
....,.....,rt. ~J ~J c
( .,:...~
C.'/{="L~::~
<)
\, I ........-"....-..,..c\....\ 11'"'1...
"':;!~~~"'--t
~\. ''-'~''. ..
I .' "h :,)'" \...., Q 9
r '-- ,.,..,. Ii \ t} ., \ \ ~^ .
1 nJ;.' I \ ' '(' C',;~
i I"j I, t:~.... 04 \, ..J...... .
[,-,..,...1_.J ....:;:":.~:.;-:w:..~.~....::_...=. ...J_:.__..= .:_
._.._ _ _ MM"'
............................
.
t
,I
no., "'\ ~~ ~~
,~
\(-'('
,:..,.,". ('
,~
'l
C"\
c:l'\
n
" "
" f;' "
'" :;, ,.,
'':t (} {)
<, tl\;J
tl
<)
.J
"
C:~ a 00
f.l
, ,
" ,
'" /' t"'\
" "
.~
"
r~~^"" "ft r-, ~~:, .~~~
! ,', <) Ii ....! J n ~-
~ !1 .~. - '-r. ._ __ () ...............................,...,..........,
~... ,.
.h......"..y"l r-..i'.::::Y~'~l":~:rf>,, "
.(. .-L..._-;.' ~
{;,;;:;)",/("-;;;::'--~ '~" ""'"
:'::::~=~.::}
.;,,1'~""'V,,,
/'
...........,,,,,.j
.......""" f..........
-I.....~,.......t'. .'
'~.~-1~~~r"~~.~-;..... J'
;.,..........,,,,,,..
..",.......;JJ
<)
..J
. '-: (fr:,; ,~~";) ':'0 Q ~ Q Q h' ~
C J
') (j Q t'~ ()
t1
~
~
l~~
~ ~.~
=<~~
t:,~ ~
~~~
~~~
,,;:....
.~ ~~
~~~
.~
=<
o
o
N
~~
o
o
o
)'....;.o<t..,Al"
r.....r"...............'
),......
,I
i
i
Q
"
\
\
..' .....".,..........
\0
c:l'\
'':10
'j
~ \
~ },
~ I Q.,
" ~ / (: rh1 tl
Q ~. I !.._1, tl;
1\[........./ \ ! ~
\ l.._.. II:>
,....' . .,....' '3 I If) .
'-^.~"/ II /'
t'1 \1 ~.JlJ"""
",1)/"
;0', .. ".:~l II'
" ',I
r I l'
C}~
"
~.....\
1
1
I
J
I c,
"
"} 0
'. ;.L:I
l~"',jO
/ J-"',J . ,...;,
..</ / 't
l ,....../ \
."iJ. ~1;L 1
,/(I;~::::;...J "l
l
I
~Q)-:j\
)l';)~
t} tO~
f.l J'I'"
.... .. I
,... .........-.. - ]
r-'-L
[.." l"'''j
- Q I
L... [1
........
......
.....
~~:;~:::~:)
I;: () ~ .;;.~.,..... "'.
I
i
i
J
..-,
()
l) I....~
(.,~. '\. -:'1
., C -'1
'1 !
/.
t" ,
. I
I J I
I I
1 \
i
I
\
.- .- .....\\.~\
\ \. \
\ .tl
..\ \
u ~~.
\..j
\
.1
.. .,
0\
.
~ ~. \ . f J
l "'^^""'" ' ;~. i"';
\ ",-" ('
l
.) " " il !
... it':"":} i: l
::;;::~;~;:;':::j..C'; \\ ~[::] "0 g i
". . 1".............1\ t'r" l
..~ ,,1m-II '. Ii}:,' " '.,
'.,~ "t !' .-- "
,~.. ;~, t......~..........{
\~'~.~jN'~'" '" ...,~.1..
n
"
~.\
I} r-'1
<,L,-~
...m..._y I
L....._J..
I .
Q I ~
.......
}
.r
-"
,ii'
i'
\
f)
.-....' )
I'.:~;~''''
I
('
\.
C
/
'J
Q;;'
. .;~
',,- .
....~.,...
<)
"4~..~~....
C"
L
~ ,~
~
\)
.j
n i;:
~
'~
I'
..-.." . ...
1...at.)l1!:'
....,
n
( ;
,
I
!
\
\
l
i"" \\
I ~ ...""'........
)/'') .....,~.J
/ { {V":J~~'"
.x:,<.... ~
)
~
II
l
d
.1
.. ,:,..;1"
.(
,
,
./)
"
<)
."
j
t,......_,..;J"'............~~J
no
i !
~ ;
, !
1 i
\1 (
I
l \
i
l \
J \ ,.'
\.........
.' r"""\
\
\.
\ \i,.
.' J
~...... ,..........
't....... ....--r'.,r
""''''..''',......~
/;
/
/
) /(/
.......... " ,;/
....... .. "'t
.<~::~:::.:~\..:~.\
l?:'/' ::~
\'t \,....,... .'.
\ \. t!
\\
\ \.
\\ /....
\\ c.
\\ \.
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ "
'.\ \
y. \,
1\ L
'I' ct:
.\ <J.).
\\1:::\
\~\.
l{) .
"..';,
ltJ'i'
r'
..........
~
J:::
/V)
/
////~ ~ I
./ i
\.
\
,
\,
\
.....
.....
/
,
,.
r"'",
J '.
r~ Q \
~ . \.
\,,...,, " ':r
i .."
1/.... _.~,
.v!.....
<'.t
"
~
""'"
"........\
V,,"'''......''.1 ,y'''/ !~.J
/r-.. ~ ;:
~,....'\._./ ........ .. ..~..~r:J..~>__<;::;!;;i.:1' .....,.. .'
.......v......................~:'I'.......:,.~~.;,-. ....';i'..........
,
....,. .... l
....,..;:-:. ~:~] ~:~, '.
'0 '- ". '.. ,
. ~ I ~,\.:" "".
f}.~ t~Q ""-h......." ,
.- .- LJ:...." ~ r:
,'.. \J ',. n .~ a '.......- ._-~}~,~;l
a \ \
~ I) <l t '..
""'" ('~'I /\\ "
_.~~.,.,r'. I ( ....J
'J
.f"
I
\
<~, Q
~<l
.A.'...I....).~~
'\ .,.......
..!.';~:.:!:::.:~:~........:...... .'....~....'........ ...... .--
:]1 ~'IJ-:::"l
...-.._~ l 11
CJ f [-I~~I--:' 1
...:......;'. ...................... ~ ;;) (! ..........') ".l ,)
c\ <, r.-~~._:. ~::'1, -{.r ~; f"l <,
/ I ~ L..~c., .] l:)='~~~i..l jl :~ w......
' r' r.. " . I ," ,~. '-.. ..,1--....-~~...i
.................... ../ ~. \..'.................. ". .....A.~.......~
<,
."
J
...___L...
. <)
\
) ~......., "
, ....-'!'"1 J
.:- 1 r- L_....."
~
J :{-]
'-.. .""",
:~.. -\..".....1.......
o
<)
"
n
n
fO
.
> '-
I 1... ,::....
(.. .
t.
"\"\"\~.
-....."
...
ro
(
" a
~')
"
1".
Ii
U
../..')
y''s
\ i
\ I
1 I
( ,
I I
1 I
I I
/"...."j J
I,.,.........~.--~...
('--f'
r-- 1._
"-I. I....
ilL ,"
.(.::-.......
'.. ". 0
I!".....~(> "
t. ()
""j .,...
1........./...
r.Q
"
t;. '. ~
~
~
~
'Cl
~
C't')
~
~
~
5-
$
'-t-
a
Q l=:
:c: c:J1
lJ) '-
~ 0:::
<J.)
c:: c:J1
S c::
'--.
a -
lJ)
~ '......
l><::
'...... lLJ
u
{':
f.'
"
n
~l~ !! I
!il ~ 1 ~
l~l ~
!!2 ~
.., w
'"
~~Iil
u6PT "1!<l!4Xa\Spa\ZO;;'~lOl\'1
II \0
['
1\\ .~
'I, n
'II. " ..
I ,,"
, ~ I '7l ~l
I Ii ,,'
Iii .~
II{ ("':,/,.r:
r I//~:_f... ....\...
I I' ".,
II ~ \: \ ,'.
. /.... ~:\;. \; ";
, i \\' \~ \ ~I
I "
II "\'1. '..;:
. I" ../
1/"" 11.1. ")
I 1J! \\...,'
\\ t)::J -,,~')
\1\ ""'-'i ,~'
L .~. Q
",\\': .""
\\\ . 0 -......
\\ ,rh II)
\' "".~ 'U "-
\\ ~'" r'Q)
\ \,.;. I. ',I ") c::
\ \, '-'-J\ "",~
\', '"'-\ ~
..::--, Q.)" .
/;,;~,~<1.) .",~
(./ '" ':(1)~ .
,t.,,,,... _
'...:',/ ". <...J \')
')) . "
,~'m I
,..."i.r#'..........,,7.........,.,..:> ! 1) 0
l. ~l I.....,.~, ~,..", i 1 .. '}
'~--"":'~::'J.::~/ i ':;;;) I '
,/',.1, I,,,
j...., ! ' ,.,
I ., \ ...... (
!\ \ : ) 't
't )....1 l
\
\ ',.
r.! ?
...,.,........-~.......l, t
\ "''-, ~
\ (....M~.._,~'-_.--..7..
'~\..........".-.......""";"""'''''''''.: ........,.' .s'\
i".......-~~
f I
, (' .
;' .i'" I,.'
.... .......\.< Jr,;f I
...., "'"""""" iT '. .. .,),
..~ ~\.. _/ I
., ,.,.,-
..... .~.il_.. 'if
01 .,......
..,........ ..... ......:::~.~~~-:. \ t"l
-; [.~ \ "
....~"..~f'.] [~::~ IlJ ,.,./~v"':"''''''''''"
..,::~~':.:: ~~;':~<-'l: -,~. ~ ,
M__....~.. ..r ',..I }.
:':-~:::':'~<~~~'MI~Jl . '" t) '-<i,' .. \...... ~~.
I (I (>ro.~.\ I j:l ,..-.,Q . f "" t ""'-~ ..,..\..
Q a co)ld F- \ J ''', ( "" "'~..,--- 'I
............ ..........:.?.:.;.;,~;~.:~~:~~.:;.::..:.Il,>' ..-;;') h~':~",v~". "}I .___..., '. <: ""'" I"J.\ \"1
.." ... -. D "'.'''u''.""._..Jr' '; 'I f . .. I
.. ................-....... C",,--' 1 ~ '. ", I \'\
~. -"', ...~.~:':.~'; .....t '.. '> ;. "'I . ..
~'r+;" 1'. I . ~ \ ..' , i. .t.... .,':_;::
' '~'" .f. {.......' j '. 1 r
'''';'''':~,^~;'. 1 ","'''--', ! '. J-' .,~. <l" t, ........
" '7? ''';:;:;'''K.....J l '\ j' I "",,\ / .~ 't
,I "".., " { f ..~,.. I <:I.".......... '.l ;\:.~.~. ':,.~,,"'..'~,v.......,~f.:...'..,\
.. , , c' '''''''\ ._.,,_""'. ."../ "..
(r1r ..~^. ~ t !'..., r,~ .r"..,.::::;.~:;,:::~ 1"",.,..,,' "-......-'" '... :".. __.............
. 1 ,~ I q 'il '....,.. ('''\..., ('j.. ".~~~,._~~--,...., .....~.,.....'< ,.P,.'^^......-~..v_~ <, 11
._::=c.<l..... "'..;"" :._ "'"... , JL..j <) i \ r \'
~'--l t;......~... .. ". '-...., /". I tl
i '. .~ ..::i},-..<;') 'r"'7 {"\ "" 1/ \. ;' [!"
J...... .""~'~'" I, , ,
~... "', ~~.~ "'''''..:~::.....::::::, I 1...._. .,l
o
o
N
\(1~~Il~
.~
H ".:
\ '. ,)
"'>':.::"~:'::',:,"
':..;. ~
.4::: .of) . fo" \) _'.
. i t r~ :'~l. Q' "
J I c," .1)"~t~:~",~ "I~r'''''j
1 1...... f L.._ a L....1
11..:]" '-'Or.!
!:~ ~ ~ ~ ,rr',""i~
~ ..r"" ~"'-'\"'-A ? .
"--''''~'~-,,,~,, ';~:_,i,.....~..."j"'~T I
f l ,,)
h I \ .
I \ 1 I "
J J I l
~ "',1 J /
l,......,."..".I"~/
':..~v~.... f
Q I
I
"I
n i
o
o
~.y.,..
~r"
/.-,
I'
n t'jl f"1
\,..,
., U
"
n
o
f
....."
//."....~.,!;;~:::
~
c
""'"
( ....~..
1
:.~l
.,t.
'"
\,
'.
..~,.;.Jo.............. ~"'1.
;
,
\
j
,
,
i
[~
f "j
, ..
\. 'I
/ f
\' 1;
Ii
'.'
"
a
"
t., "~.
,.
;~
........''r..r-.....~:;:;.''::;..:..~...::
," I..
X""'l\1")
\.~~\.;:;t,~
/........'.'1
',..........)
'It
.,}
I
'..
)
{ ~)
"
:>
~
~ ~
~~~
~ ~.~
~~-::
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
,,;:.....
.-= ~~
~~.l;l
.~
=<
L~_\ .-:.^-...........I...~._.......)\
I .......,.,.....
r'"']"
t! (=::.r.L..:;"".:! .....
" """"
. 1'''....
'''.''
......~ ..", < .. [......I..... r~' I,
.W~ "".) Q '" C",..:> I":
~. I""j I~.."..J
"'-'~- -~._.- ---.l-~~~~===:::::~~:~~==~:~:::~~
"
.~r'
"~..
.r.... .'
" I J.....-' -- ~. ./
{) -.-.1-.- I r" ''f.
..../ r....w w""__ _=::-=-''':''-...__...-r': :
"\
...
/'
.(
.;0.......,.;>.
/"
l ".,'-......^.. w._.....,.-:::~~;-,.'o
.,-"""" ,.",~.~....."r \
(~~~","~~""~'--/'''~ J''''~'''(~':..:~:'~.:.::.:.
~....~..~..,...w.._,~, {, o( 1.1 K\. {"'"
" '''''''"'1 i ;; ~. }
( . 1/ 7 Q'~ f
I 1 I .
.I J"..~:'::~/"
,..-
t-_....
"
,....l
.,..-l) l...................................,..................v-r~~.;-.
.~.-
",..........-.,
./".~""'....vv"" ........""......... .................~^..... ...""""-'
..........r"\
r'" ~"<l at
".... \
',. J""""\
., 'j j
1 J L,",r}~
. ., ,'"
I .1 i .,_.t
"
.~
.-;~..,
"i .,
/1
I
. ..,
./ '
".
............... .,.:...,..t:'^......;.;:.::-.c.:i::;::~~.,.;:.^-::"j~~;. ..~..,.".-
........ o,,~]
--<::-.. ""]"..J..-
....-.......
"
"
,
)\
,
':;.
"rl ~
~ . p .
......\ (\ ir-r-:t."".....{,
f';!.;~:~~~~=:.?.;.? "~~:'" ." ".~
,!1 1 ....... " \,
,,1.'1 "........... ......." >C)
" <:};I:!3.':-'
~----~8~'
r~l 1'''....\".'1
" l....__...r"
~1' (0. (0".
''-.
.; .=:: .~..r""'Jl \.....~:.,,-
\}. ~. .---" PO-..-......... 0 r'~-"j\
'i:::>."-----" A '.:1" /-.,~ ( It
_._2"t....:~.M~~~'''. _~~,", ..~ ~ ..~.;'(
CJ
o
'.
fl.- ...:: ~")IL"'l. f \'
.... "',.1...1.
11/....:::: ,....."..- '. >
OJlhl.., [,: 1\
, i I ......." ...... f
} ~ \ <> 1 I (."
I il \, !
{~~
10
~.
, l
11
.,,/
/ i
,
I
l.f,l'l""'"
'"
.-;,.
Q ..)
',"'" .\.< J J- "..
0" I ,..,,' "['~-b" .-;> tl .:,//.j . / ......r "I(
('-". ....I 0 ____........,.,. .,".. [ I~
c 1 'j;J s'-!}-
'-""":1"...1 ' ./ l >:I "'_m /-'
.) "u "i p{' ,;-/
c..,. t.) \........... to) Q Q ',-,
('} l ~""~'"l...,,_......~....... ,.~......_.................~....,w......r....'" .'\.............................-tl'".
I
'.~.....................,_.........., '"'....................v..........,........._.~.
... .~.M'MM....._ .._....:~~::~ I.?~....__....::. ._..,...,............::-.... ..........
."...., ....~. 1\ j" '-') I /. I' I~""'~"""'"
I ~w___"'~., '--.', "" ,! ',\\ 0,., ,....,..\...
..,........,~.1 I \ ...\ I Ii
r' Jl ,.... \ \.......1 l If
1. (Jf:J"~ II ~ 'r:,~" j t ; I: \. <) I i
\, L'"l''' I:J l....I \.;' I '. \t ..\1.........1
\,--' {j ..... '['''J " l' 'J:' ,"J
....1 ., /,,-,,,,. ~1" ...... I,
t ,
"'-r-~"" I I' 'l r"
1 lJ ,;'1 \h:.
"
'"
.~
"
'0
"
.n.r:
;l";
'"
.,^...",,,......,
,Jr
.r
.~~.....~.,.~",. .' .........1. ;' I
..'~ ,/'" .._-..~..........
.." .. ..~ I
(~.... 1 ,'."
. 'J I \ .. I
h"~ \ \\ J
\; '\ "'. I I I:
it \ \. f I ii
11 .... } : \
! t \.........,,! '.-'
1 ,..." '\ "....( j J
1 ~.. ", .rJ,j .;:1 ~
, "" (' i
l c ~
..,_........................
.,.
.,..,.v....
4 ~J'" r"::'-' c
f.O'" \../ L .. 0" '"
I :;:; ..,,\ 0
'-1l~'" l. "
d=;\, ...,~ "
( ;')
'.'
t)
"
~.. ::\;
':..- I . J'" ,I
'.... I.','
:'~:: ::~~..~=r.....1
I \
<l /
,"
~; rr..!/".... \
,,' I
;
I
["",'
/"'........
t "
;
{
,
"".
~
~
~
\c)
~
~
e...
~
~
e
~
'+-
C)
:1::
C)')
0::
C)')
c:::
.--
-
II)
.~
ll.J
--'
'.
1"'"
UI
r....
1.,,\
~lm
~J5i
lIt
~i2
..,
8~ l:!
!if ~ III
..,.!. z
~~ S
!i~D.
ffi
w
z
Ci
~
~I~!
~(I)~ .1 ~
... ~
~ ;!;
.
.
u p.~.l!'l!'lxa\.p~\lC;;.~lOl\'l
..............t.
" .,
- ~>~~f..
.:.....-
./
.,
. /
';? )
\
\ i
\'-1.......!
.,
)...................;vy,..._..........
,....
"l.
""-..\,
"\.
/'
( ~- f
'i-
\
l
Smithtown Road
Improvements
Right of Way Strip Map
-r-';'
\. ~
"'", ~
.. '1
(
~
\
\
." a ~
\
\ 1
~
.l
'o~!
_-"-\.0_
I -.\_~
l' "';
"\.. '"-'-,......""",.,/
, \.
--\
'; \ (.3 "
L.-Ji:J t: \. G
\ \ o!)
. ~C:~ a
\ :':'\f) t'l.c
\.;,.-0\ j .
1.."......."
~,
f
~
;
~
\.:.
.
!:.il-
I! v
" "I,
c-
(.)
1 it
l!
1 ;
1 j.---..-........
D
59
'..
, ....
..V"~
r.J c
Q....~
I I
W
Cl
"
i
,
,.
.i.I'
'"
"
V'
"
:) "
'-iir '..'
y ':1E.'~''') ~~'~
;~~~..:._~.~~.,/----~
r I r 10 co C
~:) . ~o
G1 _..~, LJ \.)
i~"":
.\
-~
<
j
~.j
.
'-.0
c.
"
r..'
1.r-4.., ~~
~_.r{~ -
'.
"\.
I j .....-.~.
:-J 'L,:-_~
~- 1~:-""'7""""""~' ~tlr
.-. I l...fl
~ L.-! 1
I
j
--'"
'"
V i'
~~ c'; ~j
....-'
"
/
:;l
:-'-'-'
---
--~i"
"
-;;
c;~
r.J
c:
'"
"
~
'.0
~
u
-:;
...
u
,-
N
"!
".
...
52
z:
....
WSB
350 Westwllod Lake otlIce
8441 Way%a1a Bouleliard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
812.541-4800
.tA_'J,JIlC. FAX54M700
INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PI..AHNERS
r--.........
~ r-'i
. ! 1.---1
[-;~ ~~~~: L. ~
a \ \.
1 )
t
~
"
c' ,
""
! ' ~~/
.......~......,.-
"
a
~~
"
y
'~
... \ \
,
t
.W,:'"';." ,
;:,y:. ... .-.---..
'" ,~ni~:Si::? Fr
, '!~ .\.~\\! t
t ;!:~ .\'.','.....:.... ('t . :Y
,.r.-""/ <,,/' 10 ,/. ~
..r" () ./ ~j j
/' ;",/ I ./ . II i (j
1.// ;-,. C ~:o ~ i I ~ 0 Jj
j <.........-; 0 =1! , () t
10;. · ~ ~ I" ~.~
\ -c ...~,~,o, :ill ~a ! ; " ~._ v~~:_.~ t
\ c. ",;," , i . ~~i1 1=11=-':"'=':--" .
\ --~-<\'. I ...\...... .:--~{7"'~ ~7-.-.".,.;;.=~\ ;:~
U I"
,\
\~. ..>\
) }:'j
,/' ,..;;"
I ....
\ (.;. > t.::?'
.... ...~
/:.;1
, .J
..')it
:1
, ~,.
..,.............._...........k".....,.....i...(.
.._-;~..
-~.-
~
..'
v'
1/'
<r
.""" -.
1.......-.~.1
i !! ~",".,.
''-'\.i-t r;~."J'
J.~ \ t. _. .>.,
\,. ,I. i,..tV {
......-.1...
..,..~ ~~_-+G : ....~
~ r .:t
J \ /.1--1, (
.- - ! ,--"-
: \ ..... ....-:. '\ 1
\..0 \. ,..--J t r--" .'. ,5"
) a ~-" \'~ ~['....J i
,i~-r-/2: %: 0 1 _V' I ~,:' ,1,;1 ~
~~ 1 .( i'i i
1 ~\ i r \ f ;
; () \! h.-j\, ' i
\ i _..'.-:;.,..;::1:::.>:::::::::
..... .,9,",:;::':; .;...:___--.-
.......~l..;..:..:.:;==::..:;;..-- .. ~.;:::."::;::-:" ,"
.' ~)I
'-::f-;-~-~~ \(~ ---y\ \ a
~I V {o ,.~ \\ ~ \. \'C~.~=:=~
._~ "; ~ -}
l Q\.
"
"
'--<.---i
. I
// ~.j
{((',or.
II \
\
(
i i ..
~
! i
i i
! i
,
\
,
~
....
'---_._-~..............
i I
11
i I
t ~
\ \
\
i
<>
Cl .:1 0 o.\~"_..~
...._~.=
\.~..--'
'oJ
~.
'';.~...~;;:~
.-,./
('
::'1.:;
/....'\.."'l..
\. "',
............-..,
'"
D
.j
~~-----""-:
t .1'_";
:.-.
"
'.
"
Street Easement
City Ownership
-
Existing Right Of Way
<}
1
'.
~
",
.,
'.;...~
\'\
..........~~v~...
,--
1.-
o
.]
.. ..~..l...."'":\. ~
!~\,..,
'......... \,
l,.-<
,-.
\ '.
( ~
i /
( .1
\\\
\ \ ~
:.\
;
I:
. j
! i
2 I
II i
.~ \
"
!J
1"--'.
\
"-.
.0
i~~
c~
~-..;
".
1
\ 4
a
.' r....l.......
.... a L_-r-\ \ \
CJ .~~
\ i
~. I 0
':. \0
.---'.-'
\
L-'1'M"~t'
\ '
j
(
'-
I"" \.'.
f .. f. '~r::,:.-'~l
f-" 1..---:;::~1 . . ,
: . ~ - ~.,...;..~_:::~j
~~-:--"\ - -
I I ..\._..............
~_..~';J" ......~ o'
I~ ..... ;,,;~..r-..:.i""~~v5:. .0." :,.'1 ~ 1'1;'
.' o-::..:tK,.. .;.1 . ,...-.9-- .:/
I ! _.. ' E~\'" :....\'~....Z.).> "'J.\
w';..':':J P Q;.
...;' ,
o l.
, -:-., - ~ ---:','(,' ~/\
tL_ ~-
cr.1_.'}
o
"
"
I
,
\
,
I
, 0
,
i
,
,
cl......_......,
()
'"
r"'---
':"--';\
<1
!
i
;
~
.:., t~:;J
: ....._;
~---.r' ...,
-'r:1---j ()
;~""'.'"V.----........ ....__..........:~
,.
..,;.
/
.-,;"'
/;"
I:
';",
l
(;
)
,
;
......-.'
.................
"
'..
~,---
.:::~~t{~./~-"\
~. , :..;~?;~) I r; '\
: ..-...--..........,
/
/
/
,.........:...
..:'.~.~,.... 'I,,!..
....:. ~
,,/" /
,f:'
/
fi
"
SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS
[~~~ti"'d
~
-
~..
..
...
~
..
..
t~"---
j ----"'i"""'~'p~
~ .. '.. \
, '
....... \..
--..... "-
~ >,.. \--.._J
. ~\._)
~
ol.
..
'"
..
~
~
..
~
,
I)' ~
.fro.
0:
....'.
...
...
~
..
..
...
p......
. --,/ .......__..........-.....,-.~
~::^ ._". J.."..,' ____ . .,.",0
_.0-'., tit ....- - \"
.... " ... - - - ~ -- - .-," ~ ~ \'~
~r--:? , \\'~ ,;)
.... ''l... "
. ", : Ii-', Q
- - ~~~.
.~.....
...
~
..
..
\k
Street Easement
27975
--......
~ I ..,
t - ').
'~"""t'-;. . 't........"
. .. \ '. ":
""'"--..---.. .. ...
'-. -;;::;.;:;:.
/' ~..r
,/ /--
/... .../
p" ",-
.'
".
",or \
r ~
City Ownership
c:
~
;e
-;
CI
.::;
...
CI
,.
'"
'"
..:
....
'"
~
Existing Right Of Way
.A
WSB
350 Westwood l..1ke 0Ilic:e
8441 WayzaIa Boul8vard
Mlnneapcfis, hiM 55428
", =
....."--.~
. ......
tJ \
;,
i
. - -
{hcrc'ay ~f)' that this pljlll or report was prepared by {
;or under my dil'C~ superviJion and that! am a duly,Rcp:
.~. S StW'Vcyor Ullticr the 1a",\ ofth~tau: ofMinnesot
.~\JV...,-J-. ~-
STEVEll V. ISCKE
DAtE lJ25/CO 1l.EG. NO. 227Q3
A1TACtl~E)JT 2..
, ..
\
.,
.
'--" --.!
112.5"1_
,,"-<Iaf.... lilt:. F~ 5"1.1700
INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PI..AIlNERS
n
.\
~J
~I
;-L
oJ' <.t 0;>
j" t\~ 0
" :<:'.:~ 6';{5
4 -;.--.....:... > ___..__._...
t v..."...=.-_..."""'^~.,.....,.,....",_.'*
'1/ U~
...~ -~ ~Oi5~ n
.1. Ol~ it "to 1;\
::t \. .
r: ~ (;=._~-;. f .~\ U t
P" ' 19 8,;~'1 (
........_~_ 1_._- )
. ,,,....._.....-v...................._,..-
<--=,' l 1
l1 u Q.~..:::,::!y.. : ~
... --, t 1
..~., r!?\-:i..
r-.,)~. t ~',~
~o1e. -- Q
) ~ -1:10
..........,..~ ..
.LNIOd HSI:I"W ~'"
I" 0
'O\7~~,(@ ,:
..............~.............. 'r. L_~
~.... -
o ....~........ ---(. .1:""
.- ..J- '_J.. .:
~ o~L~@ i
CD -'-''''''', j ;l:,:1 '. 1
N "..,....
-~-... I
..
.,
~I
.1
.J
-l
..
.. en
l-
I-
~a: .-
:is
~...I -
~ ..J
~ ~ .~ w >
~ ~~ J: I-
-
~ ~ I- 0
~~~ ~
c c~ U. <C
-....a'--. -
~~~O a:
0
~~::= l-
I- 0
.~ en -
>
~ w
3= 0
I-
o
o
...
~~
o
o
D
<)
<t
'3
Q
r--.
E..,
~
~
t
~-l
\
....
';
Q L
I
l'
\.
,
"
> ,.
fl....
Q
.. o:l
)
.,.,,~.I
t
\\ i
(
l'
i
l
f"'-""''''---';''~
. {...
..
,,'-"~-
~--, '...
. lII::t ....\
'~'",--::::::=::~.:::.::::::-
< Q Q
lJ.:-:jo", .
I...'...J-
I il IJ Ii .....,.-.........\
.,..-
< \
Q.... i 0 Q
../
..-.....~/-..." ---~-"...
.../'-~.'
"
I (,
_..,t' ....~..
on
..
~
................~.....-
Q "0 ..
.. 0
Q .> ..
Ii
.. ____.......~"""V.. ...
,..~..
t....., ...~ t J
., I
....;
.)
r:"3 ......
f)
., 'J
<.
<!
'.1'.. ('
'.
~.
n
....
Q ':10
Q :, "
(l ...
G
0
.. G
0 r.
..
'1
~
~
.,J
-I
6-
:s:
't--
a
1::
c:n
Q:
c:n
c:
:;:::
tJ)
.~
Lu
.~ ?J: ..."",olf'\" a:5
27215['--=]( !
. -- t ~
".-..--..,-.......----....JO ,. '""""-
..ft_-_..::::.::::.....,~j .~
...".,,.-::-.. --..z-.:..::.--...~'--...,,_.. .~
. -~- -II-I"?:iol..:...__.....,. ";'-. .::::;.........-:::..Cn
- ~ ..........--. - ~..- ..- i
.. ,,~. ,.,..;::.-=:: ---::"1
-"~c. .:-^''''''''it'''"..l'''-'' \t ....... l
. ,r L...
\, .,.A:.....-... .,. \ I mo
· L...- t L
~ . 27325 ) J iJ:
~L r"'"\......- _/..)..~- ~..
- ". ~ ---~-...........--...... ..............,.......~.,.-
Q.
:c
tJ)
\....
lD
c:
~
a
~
t>
~I
0-
~r;:l~ (,
:0 -
Q<) 13 <)
Q
.:..;'~.._-..
.......^\ ".
,,'.'...J ",
i
u61"Z 'l!q!II."spa'ZIi' ~lOl ,:\
-........... ..----
....-...--...-
..~.- r
\f)1flS~ L
1:1-. "
- 09l'S~
n "
l'l n r.. .'
.. . tl t:. \:,"'[:..-
O&LS~C :..
,...,,..........
..,>" J
..,..............,...
/,....-'.....1
~_.~.J'.
....""r.............~.::.. r~--~""....-......,
~ .r"';,..,_~ J' "'-.. J
~ "'r] ....~, .r '"
-L - --'J-"
. ..... - J
..
. en
l- I-
~a: -
:E
~..J -
..J
~~
~ ~ .~ W >
~ ~~ J: I-
-
~ ~ t- o
~~~ <(
.s~~u. -
'5 ~~ 0 a:
0
.~ ~ C I-
~~~ .- 0
-
.~ en >
~W 0
3:
I-
o
o
N
~~
o
o
o
\,..,
!
l
I
I
j
I
....
I-
e.. ..!
'\ !:r-:-_-... )
'. k1~
-;.....I=:.J "
"
'"
.,
g ,
o t
" \
\
",---'---f
...,.....~_.......... - .
.'
,.............
('<.....
I ") ;:;_.
I
I
I
\
j
".--'-'
,,,,..'"
'"
"
....,. "[
"'-.....".......".-....,,. . ..,
""'/
II 0.....
O'~ >^
...,. "
T"" ,...".
CD
ON
.' :r'~
'\
'\
\
\ "
~. ...,
"l~'''''' ,.,..,.--
"'" ...-....
. ..r- ..,,....~
....,.,
;'". nn
1 r
.. """.~ ....! l...
J ".. . .,--. ~.,
-......._...- oo;ro _ - ----:P-.,....
/J.
I }
I" ,-..,\
,; ~
" .
...........r-" .;
/-i:.:.tU ...........'.
1\
~ \
": ~ J Q ~
!.,II "
Q./ 11 tI
'\tJ l J i Q
\ ..~~~:JJ'I fn ,..".. '''-~?-.79~ ~~
o " '0 '4!t ~_.... .,
o to 11 .' "tl.. ....
I .., ~ K ~
1 a "411 Q ~QQ :q G' ~ @~- ~
1;b ~,,;... #/ c..1D 0 I J.J.r~i J
J f. .' (]" _II.. ~. ' ....' , ?~
-OH ZN3H01 .lN~H~ ......wua~.. __J..}- _ (....
,..;-:~~ '~\'I );.-V ( ~~ )t~ {J..
~\f:-~J 't · -L:~ 'c ~ ~ J
I~J)~' \ . \ LL lO.
f ,N
r
C'lU.l(t
>?
<) ,0
r',
i
J' ~,
\j
l t.
u
"
.,
~:~
-" ':.,. ,
.....'--.:::"].~ -~,~,
~ "- I '6 i'7 "::.:; ",
l --' ~1
r .. .. __ -'~7
I N~"Ab~\..,.
..1 . f-~ f'>.. -. .
-'
......... .
. ""...."1
'. - \ 1
I'
r-J 1
.................--;
a
..
10
aI
j) CD .
I) f)
,-,
o .)
--I
-.... ..-,
I \' ./
----I \~f ~~
~^\ ~_. I
yJ ~~, -L @
.I..~.~~ -L
-..... .....-... .....,.-;,:......'1
- - ~ .....,..... ~"-':~,. .. t:-- -0 _J . .
:::::::::::::::l 0 Q (I .."0.... '.... '..I.." Q;X;
.-....-. ....0_ .............. ,;
/1 0' i' ,_ ~
,.-;ir, _____ ,"
l..)L- L - - -- -. -;::-~ .::J
( . - -==- :.::.
,.----) -:-=--< 1--)'
L._\) ~ (Y) )
.n U~\t@)
/1 .....J~ ) L._ 36525
IE .('.........._". J . 1 r I)
( ,......-.-.... ~.,.:. I)
n - :s~~(:l j i365~~ ,
\ 'I \ ,r....) Q~-l;'-:~'~ "\_. <:. nQ'J :"
\ I ! ( ~.' .: ~'...= J"
~- .... -::--:--.... '"r.. " J '\. OJ II ! -;:...:;;:-._ ~~--""""'l
.-.." ........ _....".. f'! ~ ''l.,,_,.. ......._......_
l~ .'--.
... -HC 3.lNIOd HSH""W
o
n <)
"
!J
n
a
I
,
--'
Q
u "
~ .,
- - - \ I
11\
2 ~ \ \
\\'\
Il .....
"
r
..r>
"
/,
.....
E...
~
~
ct
:c
<t)
I.-
Q.)
c::
~
6'
$
lJ-
a
1:::
t:h
0:
t:h
c::
:;:::
<t)
'><
l.Jj
ml
f~:
ill n ~
..~ ;u~
-lli.l!~ ~~ ~
;lit h ~
Js:i ~
M'" ~
~I~I
~~ II
u P'('l!'l!'I"\SP'\Z"'~LOI\:l
/~
"
Smithtown Road
Improvements
Right of Way Strip Map
'EAST OF LRT.
TO CT.Y. RD. NO. 19
I
"
"
t
1
..
..
,
R
"
..
,
'"
~
,..
C>
;;
...
Q \00
I
200
\
\
'-.\
----'
f
,
i
.... L..J____(
fr
t...'l'
~
\
i
r-"":
\!
\L-
~
c::l
:>
"":--) \
I \.
,/ I ,,_
'>k ~?/-1. _~ t')
n. . ol. ./', \ ~___--' ) I.
./' ~" -=- . " l ./'1 \! "\''1... Q ,"""
\ ....... 'llo. ~ l \ .../ l' ~. )
~ " \I'f 1 t I~\ r-- :.......
.......~.; -', .::.... Ir / ~ / '-...J iJ" '.
.;-..., ":.. -'.. ""-.... 1_
'\ .....~......,... ~ o' u" ~
. .. l' ) ~'... ~ ..... - ~~-~G"~
I \ . ~ , ,;.I' _ ~T'" _ .
{. 4< \..... - 11 I :I-,.~\ r'0:::::....;::o:1?i;.-' f~' ~,..:::.t-="'''";.
, -------., \ -.... ''''a' 'I __ ~ '.
..--...-......-.:,; -'-~\ 1:I~'7/ \.. "_";?;"-; ..,' ~\\
J:;.,"""(Yo""'"~. street 5-a:semeN 'J ......'./ ./ ,-.i
------......~~ n.:.._./ ./ / 0 \..' .' , c
-- -..;;;;....." "..,. \, ;'" : .
.... .r .; '" . ....., /.='
'-) " o~~ ~ CitY..JJwnership ..,_...-:.:.."
r...~--' -"'".. 0 (2 ... = ::1 .~\ ."
l .r' " ..
_ "Existing Right or Way
CQ
... ...."
-:~-_.;::--..:..:.;;.....:;:;- .J{
J .~~ . ~
I' .""ro' \ 'l.
.. J:F \-;.
r. \....._ . \\ '\.
... ,. ."
/ \.
. I ~
.-"'V ..,.-..~ I
~" .' _0:
" .,.., "
-..... - -...... . ,
....
I~--' J
. t
........- --. \
..........f.-......-_____~~ .~ _ i...
-.
.,.....,~-.~~
'-... :/
-...,......:;:....
"
"
o
, *-:;::::=
//' I',
i i/
., ,...
II
A
WSB
350 Westwood Lake 0IficII
6441 W;ry.zata BauleYanl
Mil\lllSllPOlia. Mil 55428
;1 -
-- Tl
<0 (10 \
Cl t
t
I
~
,,-,
'.
....--....-...
(..........~ 1..
~ t --
<I 0" .,
GOQ
0;
i
"
.~,
- ,.
11:!.541-411C1O
.. A.aoc/crla, """ FAX 541-1700
lHFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . P\.ANNERS
SHEET -4.
.4_...._.._______
~~
II')
h
~
t.oj
,
.',
".
.,
I
.~.y;o;.c~-::=.5
o
o
N
:~ "~'- r-.,
':):.. .....0-1-1.. !J
l
t
I
I
.,
00
o
............
/~
-{
\.., 1
\.
(::::~::.~:..~
~ .."l I ......., e
",
. en , . $
~ I- .... (s
~ I:t . .C:i. 1::
t::! ~ s.c ..J O. -C: 0\
~ ~.~ (J) '-
.z ~ a:
~~~ . ~ 0\
c:
=::5 u. c '-
-
~
~~~ .0 a: ~
~~~ lW
.
......~ .>
~'-- t- ]- I
.~ ~~
en :0 ..
~~~
<( o.
.~ w .... .. q
~ . all I)
I)
Q
q
a
~l~ H I
11 j z ;&;1.:s
~Jl2 ~il...
llf .
~.-j m
!ill:!; ~
.., ffi
.. t
./7;" I
J \. .
i ... f \ I
\ ~ .. ~ \ .
..... A
Q Q
Q
I"n.~
~I!~
..~ II
1.1
.
uiSp'S-1!<l!'I."SP"'/:S. ~ lDl V
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR
SMITHTOWN ROAD
PAV'T SHLD1R FROM
ADDRESS WIDTH (FT) CIL (FT)
24450 Smithtown Rd 12'5' 14'0"
5680 Cty. Rd 19 12'5" 14'0"
24575 Smithtown Rd 11'0" 13'0"
24470 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24530 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24560 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24590 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24620 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24650 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24680 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 14'0"
5705 Christopher Rd 12'5" 14'0"
24725 Smithtown Rd 11'0" 13'0"
5705 Christopher Rd 11'5" 13'0"
5710 Christopher Rd 11'5" 13'0"
24785 Smithtown Rd 13'5' 15'0"
24800 Smithtown Rd 11'5" 13'0"
24860 Smithtown Rd 11'5" 13'0"
24845 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 15'0"
24930 Smithtown Rd 11'5" 13'0"
24905 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 15'0"
24945 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 15'0"
25005 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 15'0"
5715 Star Lane 11'5" 13'0"
5720 Star Lane 11'5" 13'0"
25015 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 15'0"
25040 Smithtown Rd 11'5" 13'0"
5655 Fairway Dr. 11'5" 13'0"
25180 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
25270 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
25235 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 16'0"
25310 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
25295 Srnithtown Rd 13'5" 16'0"
25335 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 16'0"
25340 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
Page 1 of 4
ATTACHMENT 3
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR
SMITHTOWN ROAD
PAV'T SHLD'R FROM
ADDRESS WIDTH (FT) CIL (FT)
25365 Smithtown Rd 13'5" 16'0"
5670 Wedgewood Dr. 13'0" 15'0"
25380 Smithtown Rd. 13'0" 15'0"
25405 Smithtown Rd. 13'5" 16'0"
25445 Smithtown Rd. 13'5" 16'0"
25440 Smithtown Rd. 13'0" 15'0"
25480 Smithtown Rd. 13'0" 15'0"
5705 Eureka Rd. 13'5" 16'0"
25525 Smithtown Rd. 13'0" 15'0"
25585 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
25575 Smithtown Rd. 13'0" 15'0"
25620 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25650 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25670 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0'
25675 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25700 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25730 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25725 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25760 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25775 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25780 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25810 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25840 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25860 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 12'0"
25855 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25880 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25900 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
25965 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25985 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
25980 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
5765 Kelsey Dr. 12'0" 16'0"
25895 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 16'0"
25920 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 15'0"
25965 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
Page 2 of 4
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR
SMITHTOWN ROAD
PAV'T SHLD'R FROM
ADDRESS WIDTH (FT) CIL (FT)
25980 Smithtown Rd. 14'0" 16'0"
5765 Smithtown Cir. 14'0" 16'0"
5770 Smithtown Cir. 14'0" 16'0"
26065 Smithtown Ln. 12'0" 16'0"
25985 Smithtown Rd. 12'0" 16'0"
26065 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 17'0"
26100 Smithtown Rd 14'0" 16'0"
26270 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
26275 Smithtown Rd 15'0" 19'0"
5825 Strawberry Ln. 12'0" 13'0"
5830 Strawberry Ln. 12'0" 13'0"
26300 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
26350 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
26355 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
26405 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0'
26410 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
26525 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
26550 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
26575 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
26600 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
26640 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0'
26675 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
26710 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 17'0"
26750 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 17'0"
26755 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
26780 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 17'0"
26825 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 13'0"
5845 Cathcart Dr. 12'0" 13'0"
5840 Cathcart Dr. 12'0" 13'0"
5875 Afton Rd. 12'0" 13'0"
5900 Afton Rd. 12'0" 13'0"
5790 Marsh Pointe Dr. 12.5" 14'0"
5900 Afton Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
5875 Afton Rd. 12'0" 15'0"
Page 3 of 4
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR
SMITHTOWN ROAD
PAV'T SHLD'R FROM
ADDRESS WIDTH (FT) CIL (FT)
27055 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 15'0"
27215 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 15'0"
27225 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 15'0"
27235 Smithtown Rd 12'0" 15'0"
27240 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27260 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 15'0"
27280 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 15'0"
27340 Smithtown Rd. 15'0" 17'0"
27360 Blue Ridge Ln 15'0" 17'0"
27420 Blue Ridge Ln 15'0" 17'0"
27480 Smithtown Rd. 15'0" 17'0"
5990 Lake Virgin a Dr. 15'0" 17'0"
28155 Boulder Br. Dr 15'0" 15'0"
28005 Boulder Br. Dr. 15'0" 15'0"
27910 Smithtown Rd 12'5" 16'0"
27920 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
27930 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
27940 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
27944 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 16'0"
27950 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27960 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27961 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27964 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27968 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27970 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27975 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 15'0"
27980 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 14'0"
27990 Smithtown Rd 13'0" 14'0"
Page 4 of 4
~
w
. CL~
>---< ~,
~I'<;j-
I-(/)
(/)
OW
"'='
(IlI-
~~
"''''
0..0
W
Z
<I
..-J 000
,
,........
,........
.
w
Z
<I
..-J
,
,........
,........
~
W
CL~
>---< ~,
~~f
:::,L
..-J
<I
::3
,
(:)
If')
"-
o
::l
~~
lrz
0<
"''''
0.0
ATTACHMENT 4
ZB.o "
15" B[TUKlNI1JS SURfi'CE
IJ'(:I
.:j' SlRlPED StD..LDER
j1' l.JIlo.E
~
83' TO EDGE IF Vi'LK'v'A r
:131 :BIT1JNlNDUS SU\f' ACE
e' SlRtPED Sl-DULDER
L11 ut./E
51 DITCH
DR BL V/D I VAU(
-
. I
ROADWAY SECllON WESTOFLRT
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council ft~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator (}).)
March 21, 2003
Update on County Road 19 Intersection Project (Council Agenda Item 9A1)
Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation Director, and I have been in contact over the past few
weeks. The County has been involved in several meetings 'that included the owners of the (former?)
Smithtown Crossing shopping center; Tonka Bay officials; and the City's engineering consultaIit,
WSB & Associates, who the County will retain and pay for further redesign work.
Progress; or new directions, of note are:
1) The County agrees with the owners of Smithtown Crossing and of Truffle Hill Chocolate that
there should be a full access to serve their properties, and that there should be a sheltered left-
turn lane for east-bound traffic. This change ~ould result in a major redesign of the project
thatthe'County would need WSB to perform. "This redesign would take up to eight weeks to
complete.
..'
With this new direction, it would appear that a limited amount of construction could occur
during this construction season. The bulk of the work would take place next year.
,
The prjmaryissues to be addressed prior to the opening of the EFD/SLMPI) station are the
installation of a temporary traffic signal at the CR19 intersection and the roadway grade.
needed, at the fIre equipment eXit onto CR19. Technical issues will needfwiher planning by
County, City, and public safety staffs. I mentioned to Mr. Grube that having the liquor store
razed would also demonstrate commitment to fInish the project.
'\
He also mentioned some issues related to draina.ge, and particularly to Gideon Glen. I noted
that the City had planned to make the land available at no charge for the County to. build the
. required storm water pond.
2) Mr. Grube believes that good progress is being made regarding with the City of Tonka Bay
regarding its issues. He has been invited to discuss the project with the Tonka Bay City
Council at one of its next two meetings.
3) Mr. Grube is concerned about the rising cost of the project. I related that the City has pledged
to pay its fair cost consistent with County policy for similar projects, and that the City would
consider borrowing against its MSA allocation for three years into the future, ifnecessaty.
{) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
=lt9fJ/