042202 CC Reg AgP
"
\
't
..
'..
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 22, 2002
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor Love _
Garfunkel
Lizee
Zerby _
Turgeon _
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2002 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of April 8 2002 (Att.-#2B Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions
Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the
Consent Agenda. Comments can' be taken or questions asked following removal from
Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.-#3A Claims List)
B. Approval of the Fee Schedule (Att.-#3B Finance Director's memorandum, Resolution)
C. Awarding Contract for Spring Clean-Up Services (Att.-#3C Public Works Director's
memorandum)
D. Approval ofa One-Time Payout for Accrued Vacation Leave for City Staff (Att.-#3D
Finance Director's memorandum)
E. Approval of Contract with Helping Minnesota Cities, Inc. for Performance Management
Services (Att.-#3E Administrator's memorandum)
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
s. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
ESTABLISHING CITY ELECTION WARDS
A. Consideration of Establishing Ward Boundaries (Att.-#5A Administrator's
memorandum)
l'r
.
~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 22, 2002
Page 2 of3
It
.
.
B. Consideration of Establishing Precinct Boundaries (Att.#5B Deputy Clerk's
memorandum)
6. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Report on Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) projects - Tom Skramstad
(Att.-#6A Project Update)
7. PARKS - Report by Representative
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held Apri19, 2002 (Att.-#7A Draft Minutes)
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Approval of Conditional Use Permit (Att.-#8A Planning Director's Memorandum, Draft
Resolution)
Applicant: AT&T Wireless
Location: S.E. Area Water Tower
B. Approval of a Minor SubdivisionILot Combination (Att.-#8B Planning Director's
Memorandum, Draft Resolution [under separate cover])
Applicant: Richard Bowman
Location: 20025 Manor Road
C. Approval of Preliminary Plat- Oak View Estates (Att.-#8C Planning Director's
Memoranda, City Engineer's Memorandum)
Applicant: 3Z Holdings, LLC
Location: 6090 Chaska Road
D. Approval of a Minor Subdivision (Att.-#8D Planning Director's Memorandum, Draft
Resolution [under separate cover])
Applicant: James Marso
Location: 6060 Strawberry Lane
9. GENERAL
A. Approval of the 2002-2022 Capital Equipment Program of the Excelsior Fire Department
(Att.-#8A Administrator's memorandum, EFD 2002-2022 Capital Equipment Program)
B. AT&T Lease Agreement (Att.-#9B Administrator's memorandum)
10. ENGINEERlNG/PUBLIC WORKS
lit'
.l
"
'~
t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 22, 2002
Page 3 of 3
11. REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. Gideon Glen
2. County Road 19 Intersection
B. Mayor & City Council
12. ADJOURN
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 22, 2002
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
For the record, please print your name and address below. Thank you.
Name
Address
I Z-t..u7 s- CEeMA-Nf: AJ€ .rl:'L (8'f/)77~F)o+8
~f1Lf: J At-LEy H N ~~ I"L~
- 1
~.~O 6J~R [.4-4
,,'"fH-o e~t:V6DD fV1A/ 5~ 331
I
1. A tJ ~ {{tv-J ~ (..Ol..J~ S
2. frlA..(Z,I{ C4~L 5 vJ
3. fa.J ~ ~<'J\ cI+
4.H1?6f ~E:~tJ1> v
d~S") ~\~,bW~ (d S~~5)
2-t)8~C;- ~(/tfTDWA1, ~b ~S33 (
5.
f'''''':-c
IUfi4
~VE ALEXANDEr(..
5 e:;75; M afS h <Pi- - 'Dr> Sh 0 re LJ ood ~3"31
6.
7. 7""- ~ rw.
8. '7Jvv1 ;)<v~,M
'70) Slit / ~A."v W"7
2l6D k>
Woo J\\f k t2,~
9.
10.
.
~... ~
1.
l
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.ci.shorewood.mn.us . cityhal/@ci.shorewoOd.mn.us
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 22 April 2002
The Board of Review will reconvene at 6:00 P.M. this evening.
The Public Hearing on Wards will be continued at tonight's Regular Council meeting.
A Work Session for discussion on Smithtown Road Improvement Project will follow the
Regular Council meeting.
Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3B: Staff is recommending adjustments to the 2002 Fee Schedule. The
attached resolution proposes adjustments to some 2002 Spring Clean-Up fees and
required changes to certain planning and building inspection fees. City Council is
authorized to set fees by resolution. Approval requires simple majority vote by Council.
Agenda Item #3C: Quotes were requested from three vendors for the May 18th Spring
Cleanup Day. Waste Technology provided the best pricing for the services requested.
As a reference, Waste Technology has provided Spring Cleanup services for the previous
three years. Staff is recommending approval of a motion that awards the contract to
Waste Technology, Inc.
Agenda Item #3D: This item authorizes a retroactive one-time payout of accrued vacation
leave to two City employees who were unable to use their vacation time due to
extraordinary workloads in 2001. Since this represents a deviation from the City's "use it
or lose it" policy, the auditor suggested that specific city council approval be obtained.
Agenda Item #3E: Based on comments made by the City's auditor during recent fieldwork at
City Hall, this item has been placed on the consent agenda for Council's express
authorization to engage the services ofHMC, Inc. The city administrator believed that
Council had provided him with the necessary discretion to engage these services.
Agenda Item #5A: A Public Hearing has been continued for the consideration of establishing
wards for City Council elections. Per Council direction, an ordinance has been prepared
which would have the two Council positions in the 2002 election be for two-year at-large
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 22 April 2002
Page 2 of3
:1
terms, with all Council positions subject to ward election in 2004. The City Attorney has
provided additional clarification about the obligations of the City in establishing
elections. The City Council must take action by April 30 for implementation to begin
with the 2002 election.
Agenda Item #5B: The State's election schedule requires that new precincts also be
established by April 30, 2002; these precincts would remain unchanged until 2012. Staff
is recommending that the number of precincts be increased from four to five, in order to
reflect the change in the City's population since the 1990 census. The proposed precincts
follow the proposed ward boundaries. Options for labeling the precincts have been
prepared depending on whether the Council approves a ward system or does not do so.
Agenda Item #6A: Tom Skramstad will be present tbis evening to give an update on aCtivites
of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD).
Agenda Item #8A: AT&T Wireless requests permission to place three additional antennas on .
the Southeast Water Tower site. This provides an opportunity, through the C.U.P.
process to consolidate its existing antenna array (it currently occupies two spaces on the
tower) and update their lease agreement to reflect current market rates. After conducting
a public hearing on the matter, the planning Commission agreed unanimously with staffs
recommendation to approve the new C.U.P., subject to a revised lease agreement.
Approval requires only a simple majority vote by the Council.
Agenda Item #8B: Richard Bowman proposes to sell the north 40 feet of his land at 20025
Manor Road to his neighbor to the north (Mark Kawell). The trouble is, Mr. Kawell's lot
is in Deephaven. The Planning Commission agreed unanimously with staffs
recommendation to approve the division/combination, subject to a deed restriction being
recorded against both parcels, stating that neither would be conveyed separately without
the consent of the City of Shorewood. This approval requires a simple majority vote by
the Council. A draft resolution will be distributed under separate cover.
Agenda Item #8C: 3Z Holdings, LLC proposes to subdivide the property at 6090 Chaska
Road into three twinhome lots (6 units). The property is zoned for single- and two-family
residential. The applicant revised its original plans per staff s recommendations and the
Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval ofthe preliminary plat. The
commission added that it wishes to see the final plat when it is submitted. Council
should direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the preliminary plat. Approval will
ultimately require a simple majority vote.
.
Agenda Item #8D: J ames Marso has requested approval of a minor subdivision to split the
property at 6060 Strawberry Lane into two lots. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend approval, subject to staffs suggestions. Approval of a draft
resolution (to be sent under separate cover) requires a simple majority vote by the
Council.
Agenda Item #9A: Under the terms of the Excelsior Fire District joint powers agreement, at
least four of the five city councils of the member cities must approve updates of the
~
l'
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 22 April 2002
Page 3 of3
EFD's capital improvement program. The District Board has presented and
recommended the 2002-2022 Capital Equipment Program (it does not include capital
facilitieslbuildings). Fire Chief DuCharme's memorandum explains the minor changes
that are proposed from the currently approved CEP. Action on revisions to the CEP is
scheduled for this time of the year in order that it may be incorporated into the operating
budget for 2003. A simple majority vote of the City Council is required.
Agenda Item #9B: AT&T has applied for a new C.D.P. at the Southeast Water Tower site for
its wireless communications activities (Agenda Item #8A). If the Council has approved
the C.D.P., it would be appropriate to enter into a new lease agreement with AT&T. The
proposed new lease is essentially identical, in terms and rental rates, to the one signed
with AT&T a few years ago for the West Water Tower site. This agreement also
contains a five-percent annual increase in the rental rate. A simple majority vote of the
City Council is required.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2002
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5:45 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
\l ~fl
Mayor Love called the Special Meeting to order at 5:59 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love, Councilmembers Turgeon, Garfunkel, Zerby, and Lizee; Administrator Dawson
Absent:
None
B.
Review Agenda
.
2.
RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (RPBCW)
PRESENTATION BY BOARD OF MANAGER MEMBERS J. PERRY FORSTER,
SUSAN SCRIBNER, AND CONRAD FISKNESS
Chair Perry Forster opened the RPBCW presentation with a series of overheads, the fIrst of which, shared
the overall Mission Statement of the Watershed District as provided by the Minnesota Legislature. He
reviewed the various responsibilities of the Watershed District, which are prioritized due to limited
resources.
Manager Conrad Fiskness provided a history of the District. The District was fIrst formed in 1969, with an
overall plan fIrst prepared in 1972, a second generation update in 1996, and currently, the PRBCW is
starting to prepare a third generation plan.
Mr. Fiskness showed a map delineating the RPBCW and the portion which includes Shorewood. Although
only a small sliver of Shorewood falls within the RPBCW, Mr. Fiskness pointed out that it is an important
piece made up of Silver Lake, which is the headwater for one of the branches of Purgatory Creek.
.
An introduction of Managers, District Advisors, and Citizens Advisory Board of the RPBCW followed. Mr.
Fiskness pointed out that the District operates without paid staff and hires out services which include
Attorneys Krebsbach & Haik, Barr Engineering Company, a CPA, and Lexicon Communications fIrm.
Garfunkel asked how people are chosen to serve on the Citizens Advisory Board. Fiskness stated that
anyone who has an interest in environmental issues is invited to join. Often times, people get involved due to
a specifIc concern. Garfunkel added that he felt people were virtually unaware that they could join. Susan
Scribner agreed, stating that the Communications Consultant is currently putting together articles to run in
the local papers informing the public about the District and inviting them to participate.
Ms. Scribner continued the presentation by discussing the administrative budget and what responsibilities
fall under that umbrella. While the RPBCW would like to focus its attention on cooperative and special
projects, she pointed out that often a good chunk of money is spent on enforcement issues. As a taxing
authority, the RPBCW tries to spread the projects around the District since the entire district comprises the
tax base. Ms. Scribner mentioned other funds, including the Basic Water Management fund for projects, the
509 Plan fund which pays to implement projects, the Streamwater Maintenance and Repair Fund which can
be carried over from year to year, and fInally, the Survey and Data Acquisition Fund which operates like
"seed funding".
=#=~ ft
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
Apri18,2002
Page 2 on
Most often, the RPBCW works with cities on a cost-share basis when beginning plans with communities.
Zerby asked whether the District would consider assisting a school to perform water quality studies.
Recently, a school approached Shorewood to request funds for a monitoring project, Zerby asked if it would
be appropriate to direct them to the Watershed District. Scribner said that the District would absolutely
consider funding, if the water body was located in their watershed.
Mayor Loved inquired over the possibility of working together in a partnership with the Watershed in the
future in order to examine water quality. Mr. Forster began the final segment of the presentation
surrounding just that topic. He stated again that while Shorewood is only a small sliver of the Watershed, it
is an important headwater, adding that the District would be fascinated to get into discussions about this
topic.
In regard to the criteria for Watershed contribution used for water resource management, a schedule exists.
Fiskness pointed out that the District picks up 100% of the cost of water quality or quantity management,
land acquisition and purchase is covered 50%, and amenities like interpretive centers are covered by a 25%
contribution. Mayor Love indicated that he would like to talk more about Shorewood's environmental .
concerns and establish a closer working relationship with the RPBCW.
Scribner stated that the Silver Lake Park acquisition would be a good place to start planning future projects
with Shorewood. As a critical piece of the Watershed District, it would be a good starting point.
Mayor Love pointed out that Shorewood is environmentally conscious and has an environmental committee,
the LCEC, who is charged to work on preservation initiatives. He added that the City is familiar with, and
currently working with another Watershed District, and would be an easy City to work with. Forster stated
that Administrator Dawson is welcome to call up the District to start the ball rolling, adding that they too
would be easy to interact with.
Mayor Love asked if the District representatives would be willing to introduce themselves to the Planning
Commission and possibly LCEC at a joint meeting later this month. Zerby stated that it would be helpful to
have the District representatives visit annually to update the Council on what's happening in the watershed.
Scribner pointed out that a new publication would be sent out to member cities quarterly to update .
information for them.
Forster asked for the Council's support for he and Scribner's reappointment, stating that they enjoy their
positions, have learned a great deal, and hope they have contributed during their tenure.
3. ADJOURN
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, adjourning the City Council Special Meeting of April 8, 2002, at
6:55 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
KRISTI ANDERSON
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Woody Love, Mayor
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
..
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2002
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OR~fl
Mayor Love called the meting to order at 7:01 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Zerby, and Turgeon; Administrator
Dawson; Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; Deputy Clerk Panchyshyn
Late Arrival: Attorney Keane
Absent:
Planning Director Nielsen
B. Review Agenda
Engineer Brown requested to add item #9B, a discussion over the burying of utilities, under Engineering
Reports. Administrator Dawson added item #4 under Agenda Item #lOA Administrator and Staff Report.
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes March 25, 2002
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of March
25, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 4/0/1, with Lizee abstaining.
B.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 25, 2002
Zerby moved, Garfunkel seconded, approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March
25, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 4/0/1, with Lizee abstaining.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent
Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 02-027, "A Resolution Approving the Proclamation
of Friday, April 26, 2002, as Arbor Day."
C. Adopting RESOLUTION 02-028, "A Resolution Denying a Request for a Setback
Variance - Jeffrey Johnson, 5830 Club Lane."
-jt-;.tJ
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 2 of9
D. Approval of the AFSCME/City Labor Agreement
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Tom Kelsey, of 5705 Smithtown Way, informed the Council that Minnewashta School students will be
observing the 1st Annual Walk-in in honor of Earth Week to be held on April 23, 2002. Students, the
public, and the Council are invited to meet at Manitou Park at 7 A.M., walk to Minnewashta School
along the trails, or at 7:30 A.M at Freeman Park to make the short walk down Strawberry Lane to
Minnewashta School. Mr. Kelly pointed out that they will have police escorts as they walk the last leg of
their journey.
5. PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING CITY WARDS
Mayor Love opened the Public Hearing at 7: 10 P.M., noting the procedures utilized in a Public Hearing. .
Dawson gave a brief historical summation to make possible the establishment of a ward system for
Shorewood.
Administrator Dawson reported that at the February 11, 2002, City Council Work Session the Council
reviewed and discussed options for implementing the ward system. Although each alternative results in
full implementation of the ward systems with the 2004 Elections, two principles were identified in setting
up a staggered system. First, Council expressed an interest in a system wherein there would be a west
ward and an east ward in each election. Assuming the wards would be numbered one to four on the map,
elections for Wards 1 and 3 would be held together, and elections for Wards 2 and 4 would be held two
years later. Second, Dawson explained that incumbent councilmembers, by law, must be allowed to
complete their terms. Therefore, the terms of Garfunkel and Turgeon would not be affected until the
November 2004 election.
Dawson presented the three options under consideration for the public hearing:
1.
Phase-in ward elections in 2002 and 2004-
* Elect Wards 1 and 3 for four-yr terms in 2002 with Councilmembers Turgeon and
Garfunkel continuing to serve on an at-large basis until their terms expire December 31,
2004.
* Elect Wards 2 and 4 for four-year terms in 2004.
.
2. Begin by electing all four council positions by wards at the 2004 election
* Elect Wards 1 and 3 to two-yr terms in 2004
* Elect Wards 2 and 4 to four-year terms in 2004
* Elect Wards 1 and 3 to four-year terms in 2006
3. No change from the current at-large system of election
* Take no action that would affect the 2002 or 2004 elections
* Defer action indefinitely
Attorney Keane arrived at 7:13 P.M.
.
.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8. 2002
Page 3 of9
Jerry Brecke, 27450 Pine Bend Road, stood up to endorse the ward system. He believed that
accountability issues could be strengthened through a ward system and was in favor of proceeding via
option 1. He stated that allowing 3 of the 5 Council members to remain intact and phasing in new
members would provide needed continuity.
Bob Gagne, 24850 Amlee Road, disagreed with the ward system. Although at fIrst glance he was in
favor of the concept, after careful consideration, he stated that the idea of an increased likelihood of
appointing representatives to Council positions carried more negatives than positives. He felt the system
should remain as is, option three.
Peter Watts on, 5495 Timber Lane, stated that since 1971 he has been working with the Minnesota
Legislature on redistricting plans and wanted to attend this evening's forum to observe comment from his
own local community. He stated that in the proposed plan, he noticed that the overall range was about
15%, and believed that to be too high in comparison to the state average of 10%. He suggested adjusting
the lines between wards 3 and 4 in order to equal out the ward balance and avoid any court challenges to
the fIgure. He voiced his support and encouraged action as soon as possible, even in 2002.
Steven Dzurak, 19570 Pine Ridge Road, felt that going to a ward system would be bad for Shorewood.
He stated that the point of the ward system is to make sure that Council members are drawn from all parts
of Shorewood. While this is a desirable objective and would work well if people throughout the City
were interested in City politics, that's not the case. He stated that few people on his end of town, the east
section, were interested in City politics and he was concerned that the ward that represents eastern
Shorewood will routinely have no real election. Either one candidate would run unopposed or the
Council would have to appoint someone because no one ran for election, either case being bad for
Shorewood. Mr. Dzurak was doubtful that going from an at-large to a ward system would produce good
results for Shorewood and would cast his vote against the ward system.
Mayor Love closed the Public Hearing at 7:23 P.M. and asked for Council feedback.
Turgeon declared that initially, she liked the representation the ward system would provide; however,
after talking to many residents, she has more reservations now than before. She indicated that these
reservations have emerged after having heard many comments similar to those of both Mr. Gagne and
Mr. Dzurak this evening. The concerns over getting someone to run or having to appoint someone were
the areas she had the most diffIculty with. Turgeon believed that if someone wants to run for election
they will run no matter how many doors they have to knock on. She pointed out that the City has a hard
time getting people to volunteer to serve on a Commission now; why would they be willing to get
involved in wards. Turgeon stated that she was not convinced that the ward system was the right thing to
do right now and that she needs to get more feedback from residents to convince her otherwise.
Lizee stated that better representation is something that she campaigned for many years ago. She believed
that a ward system would lend itself well to furthering representation throughout the City. She concurred
with Mayor Love that more people would probably step up to the plate if there was a ward for them to
represent. Lizee had reservations phasing it in this 2002 election, mid stream of a Visioning Program
between Shorewood and Excelsior, and believed that allowing time to get more information out to people
regarding ward systems would warrant Option 2 electing all four wards at that time.
Garfunkel, like Turgeon, had concern regarding the current lack of enthusiasm and wasn't convinced
people would step up to run. He questioned whether the ward system might actually limit residents from
running, in that any given year a person who might run might not have the opportunity to do so in their
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 4 of9
ward. As it stands now, every two years every person has the opportunity to step up and be elected, but
because of one's geographic location, that would not be true in a ward system. He added that, while it
might be desirable to see more representation from the east side, he was concerned that a single person
could continue to run uncontested over and over.
Mayor Love stated that while he appreciated all of the diverse comments expressed this evening, he
strongly supports the ward system. He pointed out that in a representative government, the fear of not
finding candidates could exist for virtually any elected office. One daunting question remains, whether a
person from the west side, who understands those concerns, can clearly understand the concerns or issues
of those across the city on the east side. The Mayor reminded everyone that there is a check and balance
that exists within government: if the system does not work the way it is supposed to, it can be returned to
at-large representation.
The Mayor concurred that he, too, has had difficulty in how to stagger the system in. He believed it
might be easier to replace the entire Council with 2004 elections, allowing more time to identify the
wards to the public and educate them through public meetings. With regard to the candidates, Mayor .
Love believed the ward system would bring a vibrancy to the elections and encourage the public to run.
Zerby stated that he sees both sides of the issue. After listening to the various positions, Zerby agreed
with many of the points made; however, he stated that when he first campaigned it was apparent that
there was inequity that existed between the east and west sides of Shorewood. Zerby asked if the
question could be put on a ballot for the City to decide whether it would prefer a ward system.
Administrator Dawson stated that as a statutory city Shorewood does not have referendum.
Garfunkel asked if a decision needed to be made this evening. Mayor Love asked the Council if it still
favored the ward system. Zerby stated that he favored them more prior to the evening's discussion.
Mayor Love reiterated that the Council has heard a great deal of discussion about the ward system over
the past three years and that he strongly believed this was the way to attract more people and contests of
ideas to the arena.
Turgeon noted that after years of discussion, laying the groundwork for wards, not enough time has been .
devoted to gathering public comment on the issue. Turgeon stated that she could not make any decision
without further opportunity to get public input and asked to prolong the process in order to gather
additional public comment. Garfunkel agreed, reiterating his concerns and stating that further public
input would be helpful.
Realizing that more dialogue was necessary, the Mayor asked to narrow the scope of the discussion and
continue the subject until the next meeting. Although the question of whether the Council supports the
ward system could not yet be answered, the Council did endorse waiting until 2004 to implement a
system.
The Mayor complimented those present on their well-thought-out comments and stated that the Council's
desire is to hear from as many residents as possible either through the website or at the continued public
hearing on April 22, 2002.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8. 2002
Page 5 of 9
6. PARKS
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held March 26, 2002
Chair Arnst reported that the Park Commission's last meeting was a Work Session to discuss the Park
Management Plan for 2003 and the type of recommendations that could be made to the Council on that
Plan. She stated that the Park Commission's regular meeting is scheduled the following evening, April 9,
2002, with Park Management as one of the Agenda items. Chair Arnst pointed out that very detailed
minutes of the Work Session were included in the Council packet and offered to take questions.
Turgeon complimented the Commission on its numerous and detailed discussions, the time and work it
has committed to the issue, and the progress they are making.
B. Update on Security Equipment at Eddy Station
.
Brown reported that after asking vendors to revise their proposals for three different alternatives, only
one vendor was able to turn around that number of proposals in time for this evening's meeting. As such,
Brown felt it would be unfair to seek authorization at this time. Brown continued that after having
reviewed the plan with South Lake Police Chief Brian Litsey, the City will be asking vendors to supply a
sample of their equipment. Chief Litsey emphasized the importance of obtaining a clear facial image on
security footage in order to be able to prosecute. Staff will be continuing to work with vendors and hope
to have something to report in 3 to 4 weeks.
C. Set date for Public Information Meeting for Freeman Park Parking Lot and Access
Closure
.
With regard to the Freeman Park Parking Lot and Access Closure, Brown was pleased to inform the
Council that he believed the City had finally come to an agreement with the MCWD. Brown stated that
he hoped to receive approval from the Watershed District this week, allowing the City time to submit
plans prior to the sunset date on $50,000 from the State. Brown pointed out that in order to meet the
deadline, many things will l1eed to be happening concurrently, and asked the Council for its permission to
move forward.
With no objection, the Public Information Meeting will be held April 29, 2002, from 5:30 - 7:00 P.M. at
City Hall.
7. PLANNING
Turgeon reported that a twin-home development being considered on Chaska Road has spurred many
neighbors to voice their concern over the ingress and egress that exists on the service road to Chaska
Road. As a part of the approval of the preliminary plat, the Commission asked that not only the fmal plat
be brought back to the Planning Commission, but also directed staff to work with the neighborhood to
study the ingress and egress from this site. The Planning Commission will likely be asking for Council's
support. Brown added that the access to the north is somewhat troublesome and staff will be working
with the developer to improve that situation.
Turgeon continued that another issue under consideration by the Commission is the addition of AT&T
antennae to the top of the water tower, along with a new lease agreement. Turgeon added that she
believed the next CUB Proposal meeting would be taking place on Thursday, May 23, 2002, at the
Southshore Community Center.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 6 of 9
8. GENERAL
A. Rail to Trail Conversion Along North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
Administrator Dawson shared additional information as a follow-up to the March 25, 2002, City Council
meeting. At that meeting, the Council requested more information regarding the conversion of the Dakota
Rail Line to a regional recreation trail before they would consider a resolution of support. Dawson
pointed out that other cities around Lake Minnetonka have adopted resolutions supporting the
conversion.
Garfunkel stated that it looks as though a process is already underway to determine the ultimate use or
right of way of this trail. However, he added that he did not necessarily see the pertinence to having
Shorewood's support.
Turgeon voiced her hesitation in support of a regional trail not knowing how the residents on the trail or
the community have received it. As it does not effect Shorewood residents, Turgeon questioned if a .
process is in place in those communities to determine the interest. As a trail resident herself, she stated
that she could not support a trail elsewhere not knowing what the neighbors want. She believed there
wasn't enough information to support or not support the trail conversion.
Lizee stated that while she supports the concept of regional trails, she suggests the communities hold
their own neighborhood meetings.
Mayor Love was of the opinion that regional trails offer a single and unique chance to look at the broader
opportunity to link neighbors, offer safe transportation, and bring our communities together.
Zerby voiced his support of regional trails. While he recognized that this trail was not in Shorewood's
control, he could give support to the greater community by endorsing this conversion.
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 02-029, "A Resolution Supporting the
Preservation and Use of the Dakota Rail Right-of-Way as a Continuous Transportation Corridor
and Supporting its Conversion to a Regional Recreation Trail." Motion passed 3/2, with Turgeon .
and Garfunkel dissenting.
B. Recommendation of Appointments by Hennepin County Board of Commissioners
to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Board of Managers
(RPBCW)
Dawson referred to the Special Meeting Presentation earlier this evening by Commissioners Forster and
Scribner of the RPBCW.
Zerby stated that the representatives seemed very knowledgeable in their roles on the Board of Managers
and he was very pleased with the presentation they made this evening. Mayor Love agreed, thanking staff
for inviting the representatives to meet with Council and suggested an annual assembly be scheduled
between the City and each watershed district.
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO.'s 02-030 and 02-031, "Resolutions
Supporting the Appointment of Susan Scribner and J. Perry Forster to the Riley-Purgatory Creek
Watershed District Board of Managers." Motion passed 5/0.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 7 of9
9. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
A. Authorization for Expenditure of Funds for Professional Landscape Design
Services for the County Road 19
Brown was pleased to report that final comment from Hennepin County should be received this week and
the plans actually put onto municipal state aid. In going through the final design of the project, Brown
pointed out that one area that has fallen behind has been the landscape design for the corridor. With
regard to the landscape, staff has sought a proposal from Brauer and Associates, Inc. who provided a
Task 1 cost for concept designs and estimates, and Task 2 cost estimate for final design documentation.
Since clarification is being sought to determine if the development of landscape design plan is a
reimbursable item by MSA, staff is recommending that Task 1 items totaling $3,900 be approved at this
time. Once clarification is obtained regarding reimbursement of the total landscape design, Brown stated
that the final proposal will be brought back to the City Council for review and action.
.
Zerby suggested staff take cues from the recently completed Excelsior bridgework and Deephaven bridge
and landscaping, and work to maintain a continuity between Shorewood and its neighboring
communities.
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds for Professional Landscape
Design Services for County Road 19 in the amount of $3,900 for the completion of Task 1 by
Brauer and Associates, Inc. Motion passed 5/0.
B. Discussion over the Burying of Utility Lines for the County Road 19 Intersection
.
Brown stated that concurrent with construction and landscaping, lies the issue of burying or
undergrounding of utilities. He pointed out that the City Council recently took action to pass an
ordinance requiring major utility companies to underground their facilities when a project like this
triggers such an action. The utility companies have, however, in looking after their own best interests,
contended that they are allowed to take any costs and pass them along to the cities or the ratepayers
within the corporate boundary of Shorewood. As part of the streets cape and construction project, the
City is of the opinion that this is one of the prime projects to take a look at undergrounding the utility
lines along this corridor. Although the undergrounding will involve the City of Tonka Bay, at the
southwesterly end of the shopping center, they would like to forge ahead and request the utility lines be
buried, anticipating the costs might be passed along to the consumer.
Brown stated that the original estimate by Xcel for the undergrounding along the entire corridor was
$84,000. Mediacom estimated its cost to be an additional $25,000. Unsure whether the City of Tonka
Bay would be willing to have their portion of the utilities undergrounded, Brown has requested that a
separate cost estimate be worked up. Staff has encouraged Tonka Bay staff to consider bringing this item
to its Council to discuss the burying of utilities along their corridor. While he was unsure of Tonka Bay's
position, Brown urged the Shore wood Council to forge ahead with the undergrounding of facilities to
enhance the Gateway Concept.
With regard to this issue, Brown stated that Hennepin County does have a roadside enhancement fund or
safety fund available to help offset some of the costs. Staff has drafted and will be sending a letter to
Hennepin County requesting these funds. He promised to keep the Council apprised of the situation.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 8 of9
Turgeon encouraged Council to support Engineer Brown's position and forge ahead based on its recent
Ordinance to underground utilities. Mayor Love agreed, stating that Brown could take this as the
position of Council.
10. REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. Gideon Glen
Administrator Dawson stated that he and Planning Director Nielsen met recently with the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District staff to discuss general public information. and education that they would like
to see happen in the future regarding the project. .
Brown added that the Glen RoadJAmlee Road drainage issues are awaiting the finished design of Gideon
Glen before moving forward because the two are interrelated.
2. County Road 19 Intersection
.
Brown reported that notices have gone out to property owners by Hennepin County asking them for a
right of entry. As far as Brown could judge, he believed that most owners were in favor of the design
except for possibly one or two individuals.
3. T.H.7
With regard to the County Road 41 and 7 intersection, Brown reported that the City of Chanhassen
approved the provision to make the intersection an accident reduction zone area.
Mayor Love inquired over a potential stop light at Church Rd. Brown stated that MnDOT is well aware
that both City's favor this addition. Zerby questioned the possibility of adding a light at Rolling Acres
Rd. Brown said that he had not seen any plans for the installation of one but would follow-up. Mayor .
Love asked if other Council members had heard the same response from citizens as he had regarding the
action that was taken. The majority commented that they had heard the same reaction.
4. Land Use Planning Workshop
Administrator Dawson informed the Council of the upcoming Land Use Planning Workshop on Saturday,
April 27, 2002, from 9 A.M. to 3 P.M, at the Southshore Senior Center. Dawson stated that John
Shardlow, of Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban consulting firm, wi11lead the workshop and invited the
Council to attend.
Dawson also noted that there will be a Visioning Process Work Session slated for Thursday, May 2,
2002.
B. Mayor & City Council
1. Fertilizer Legislation
Mayor Love took a moment to recognize the hard work of Administrator Dawson, who, working with a
.
.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
April 8, 2002
Page 9 of9
number of cities and the League of Cities to generate the grounds well of support, contributed to
Representative Steve Smith from Mound affirming the legislation. He complimented Attorney Keane
and his firm for putting together an effort that best communicated the City's position to the legislature,
and to its other constituents as well. In the end, the legislation had support from 50 units of government,
the Association of Minnesota Counties, the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, the League of
Minnesota Cities, and others.
The Mayor pointed out that the day after going through conference committee, the legislation passed the
Senate with only one dissenting vote. The House was set to vote on the issue late this afternoon.
Attorney Keane reported that the House did vote today and passed 67 to 1.
Attorney Keane stated that this was common sense legislation. From a state and national perspective, he
maintained that the Council and City of Shorewood has much to be proud of. Keane noted that "this is
the mouse that roared", the City of Shore wood teamed up with other cities, aired the arguments and good
law was made at the local level. He applauded the City and State for being the first in the nation to adopt
this legislation.
2. Public Safety Facilities
Mayor Love advised Councilmembers that a Joint Work Session of the Councils is scheduled for
Wednesday, April 10, 2002, to discuss the public safety facility.
The Mayor also reported that he was present at a recent Minnetrista Council Meeting when a question
from an Enchanted Island resident arose on the subject of assessments. The Mayor replied that, while the
deterioration of the bridge has hastened over the past 40 years and it is not eligible for MSA dollars,
Minnetrista is eligible for grant money. An estimated $500,000 from MnDOT is available in grant funds.
Turgeon informed the Council of an upcoming meeting between the Planning Commission and garbage
haulers scheduled for April 23, 2002.
Attorney Keane complimented the City on its election ward discussions. He believed it to be a great
example of the democratic process in action no matter what the outcome.
11.
ADJOURN
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of April 8, 2002, at
8:43 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Kristi Anderson
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
..
PAYABLES APPROVALS
For 4/22/02 Council Meeting
.
a ~
Prepared by: _(1fj:tft~
Catherine EIke, Sr. Accountant
~~
Reviewed by:
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director
Approved by: ~ ~ I b-6 .
Craig D son, City Administrator
.
Date: 1/-1 tf-iJ;{
Date: {/{e/c;z..-
Date: <fig/; 2--
-~"
--eh-eck-Approval-Eistfor-41-22102-Co-uncll-Meeting ---- -.'" .".--- ....-
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amoltnt
32571 US POSTMASTER 1 ST aTR 2002 U/B PSTG 4/10/02 $324.17
32571 US POSTMASTER 1 ST aTR 2002 U1B PSTG 4/10/02 $216.10
TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER $540.27
32572 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 APR 2002 DENTAL PREM 4/11/02 $261.59
32572 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 APR 2002 UNION DUES 4/11/02 $189.35
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14 $450.94
32573 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 1 ST HALF APR SVCS 4/11/02 $120.00
32573 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 1ST HALF APR SVCS 4/11/02 $120.00
32573 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 1 ST HALF APR SVCS 4/11/02 $180.00
TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B. $420.00
32574 FRIENDS SO. SHORE S 4/23 AND 5/2102 MTGS 4/11/02 $50.00
32574 FRIENDS SO. SHORE S 4/23 AND 5/2102 MTGS 4/11/02 $50.00
TOTAL FOR FRIENDS SO. SHORE SR CTR $IOO.OO
32575 G & K SERVICES 4/11/02 032902STMT $478.09
TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES $478.09
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345494 $3.80
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345494 $412.88 .
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345496 $635.20
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345499 $98.34
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345499 $317.60
32576 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/11/02 345766 ($46.44)
TOTAL FOR BERMEL WHOLESALE $I,421.38
32577 ICMA RETIREMENT TR 04/09/02 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 4/11/02 302131-0409 $1,389.65
TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST.457 $1,389.65
32578 KINKO'S COPIES FOR CR 19 4/11/02 033102 $29.06
TOTAL FOR KINKO'S $29.06
32579 LK MTKA CONSERV. DI WATER PATROL 2002 4/11/02 $368.51
TOTAL FOR LK MTKA CONSERV. DISTRICT $368.51
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $90.70
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $472.29
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $158.15
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $99.06 .
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $99.06
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $90.56
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $45.28
32580 MCLEOD USA 4/11/02 2401761 $97.39
TOTAL FOR MCLEOD USA $1,152.49
32581 METRO COUNCIL ENVI MARCH 2002 SAC REPT 4/11/02 $1,188.00
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $1,188.00
32582 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 4/11/02 63251067 $132.84
32582 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 4/11/02 63251174 $213.07
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA.COLA BOTTLlN $345.91
32583 MINNCOMM PAGING 4/11/02 52006804026 $17.76
TOTAL FOR MINNCOMM PAGING $17.76
32584 MINNESOTA STATE TR 1ST aTR 2002 BLDG PERMIT SURC 4/11/02 $1,912.95
TOTAL FOR MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER $1,912.95
32585 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT - C SCHMID 4/11/02 $173.51
TOTAlJ FOR MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR $173.51
32586 MN SUN PUBLICATION ASSESSMENT NOTICE 4/11/02 495910 $42.90
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
. TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS $42.90
32587 NAVARRE TRUE VALU 4/11/02 96764 $88.51
TOTAL FOR NA VARRE TRUE VALUE $88.51
32588 NIELSEN, BRADLEY APR EXP 4/11/02 $25.00
32588 NIELSEN, BRADLEY APR EXP 4/11/02 $31.94
TOTAL FOR NIELSEN, BRADLEY $56.94
32589 NORTH STAR ICE 4/11/02 55209106 $30.60
32589 NORTH STAR ICE 4/11/02 55209107 $20.40
32589 NORTH STAR ICE 4/11/02 55209108 $9.52
TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $60.52
32590 PANCHYSHYN, JEAN COUNCIL MTG DINNER 4/11/02 $81.46
TOTAL FOR PANCHYSHYN, JEAN $81.46
32591 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV BOARDING APRlIMPOUNDS 4/11/02 $38.90
TOTAL FOR PAWS, CLA WS & HOOVES PET $38.90
32592 PAZANDAK,JOSEPH MILEAGE 3/24 - 4/6/02 4/11/02 $78.48
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $78.48
32593 PERA 04/09/02 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 4/11/02 $2,117.97
. 32593 PERA 04/09/02 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 4/11/02 $2,296.53
TOTALFOR PERA $4,414.50
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108626-00 $136.62
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108626-00 $933.58
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108627-00 $1,538.16
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108640-00 $440.08
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108642-00 $551.04
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108644-00 $440.08
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108663-00 $29.21
32594 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/11/02 108663-00 $873.68
TOTAL FOR QUA/.;/TY WINE & SPIRITS CO $4,942.45
32595 STAR GROUP LLC 4/11/02 980658 $13.94
TOTAL FOR STAR GROUP LLC $13.94
32596 SUN PATRIOT NEWSP ORDINANCE 382 4/11/02 108 $32.00
32596 SUN PATRIOT NEWSP ORDINANCE 383 4/11/02 109 $79.60
TOTAL FOR SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS INC $111.60
. 32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $13.33
32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $13.33
32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $18.70
32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $18.70
32597 SWANDBY, DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $18.71
32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $39.73
32597 SWANDBY. DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $39.74
32597 SWANDBY, DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $39.74
32597 SWANDBY, DONALD MARCH MILEAGE/EXPENSES 4/11/02 $13.33
TOTAL FOR SWANDBY, DONAW $215.31
32598 WASTE MANAGEMENT 4/11/02 0269142-159 $68.67
TOTAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT $68.67
32599 WATERFORD CENTER APRIL 2002 RENT 4/11/02 0402F $7,087.62
TOTAL FOR WATERFORD CENTER $7,087.62
32600 WHEEL-EEZE RECYCLE BIN WHEELS 4/11/02 104 $783.70
TOTAL FOR WHEEL-EEZE $783.70
32601 ADVANCED IMAGING S APRIL CONTRACT SVCS 4/18/02 6774 $150.00
TOTAL FOR ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC $150.00
Description
Check Date Invoice #
Check # Vender Name
32602
32603
32603
32604
32605
32606
32607
32608
32609
32609
32609
32610
32610
32610
32610
32610
32610
32610
32610
32611
32612
32612
32613
32614
32615
32616
32617
32617
32618
32618
32618
32619
32619
4/18/02
AHLSTROM, SANDY ADOPT-A-GARDEN
TOTAL FOR AHLSTROM, SANDY
ALL SAINT'S BRANDS I
ALL SAINT'S BRANDS I
TOTAL FOR ALL SAINT'S BRANDS INC
BROWNING FERRIS IN
TOTAL FOR BROWNING FERRIS IND.
BURTON, BONNIE MN GFOA MTG/MILEAGE
TOTAL FOR BURTON, BONNIE
CULLIGAN BOTTLED W 4/18/02 31177
TOTAL FOR CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
DAWSON, CRAIG APRIL EXPENSES 4/18/02
TOTAL FOR DAWSON, CRAIG
DAY DISTRIBUTING
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/18/02 220674
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/18/02 220674
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/18/02 220675
TOTAL FOR FAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD PW SUPPLIES 4/18/02 507711
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD MAILBOX REPAIR 4/18/02 508254
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD CONCRETE SCREWS/BITS 4/18/02 508325
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD ICE MELT-CITY HALL 4/18/02 508401
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD EDDY STATION-REPR VANDALISM 4/18/02 509237
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD TOILET FLAPPER 4/18/02 509286
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD LAG BOLTS 4/18/02 509764
EXCELSIOR ACE HARD FASTENERS 4/18/02 509904
TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR ACE HARDWARE
FIREWALL REPAIR 4/18/02 041802
TOTAL FOR GEEK SQUAD
GOPHER STATE ONE-C MARCH SVC 4/18/02 2030687
GOPHER STATE ONE-C MARCH SVC 4/18/02 2030687
TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, IN
HENNEPIN COUNTY TR ANNUAL AUDIT INFO 4/18/02
TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
HOPKINS PARTS COM ASSTD OIL FILTERS,ETC 4/18/02 74144
TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY
J.H. LARSON ELECTRI BALLASTS/L1GHTS= CITY HALL 4/18/02 4272485-01
TOTAL FOR J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL CO
KIRCHER, LUCINDA ADOPT-A-GARDEN 4/18/02
TOTAL FOR KIRCHER, LUCINDA
LONG LAKE POWER E HEARING PROTECT/MISC PW PART 4/18/02 32345
LONG LAKE POWER E HEARING PROTECT/MISC PW PART 4/18/02 32345
TOTAL FOR LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
4/18/02 392339
4/18/02 392340
4/18/02 392343
4/18/02 25993
4/18/02 26234
4/18/02 03002-0200
4/18/02
4/18/02 171420
GEEK SQUAD
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
TOTAL FOR MARK VII
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
4/18/02 10716/54
4/18/02 10716/54
.\ ,": '~~::. :-'.': -,' "''','.'::,'.~''-''::k:':''''':-:' :z;:;,": n.,' ,:;',::,::::::",::[:' - ...-;m ......."...",....... "';",,..: :..;;': "^,~.^:~::,:.;' ';, ; :--.~':.,'_,.::;.~:i.',._f':'}f.'
:~:~~::~':,:,:;':;;':~::::'.:0:,';.."-
"Thii;slJii..v,"Aprll is,' 2002
Amount
$50.00
$50.00
$215.00
$107.50
$322.50
$50.24
$50.24
$35.44
$35.44
$24.55
$24.55
$70.10
$70.10
$1,183.10
$1,183.10
$29.40
$1,445.50
$1,595.75
$3,070.65
$15.53
$53.87
$35.44
$14.89
$4.78
$5.10
$25.56
$7.67
$162.84
$329.00
$329.00
$6.20
$6.20
$12.40
$25.00
$25.00
$45.06
$45.06
$304.31
$304.31
$50.00
$50.00
$87.60
$388.72
$476.32
$829.80
$1,098.70
$829.10
$2,757.60
$42.30
$42.30
,
.
.
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date In voice # Amollnt
.. 32619 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 4/18/02 10717/55 $70.65
32619 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 4/18/02 10717/55 $70.65
32619 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 4/18/02 10718/56 $31.05
32619 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 4/18/02 10718/56 $31.05
TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING $288.00
32620 MEAKINS, BEVERLY ADOPT-A-GARDEN 4/18/02 $50.00
TOTAL FOR MEAKINS, BEVERLY $50.00
32621 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 4/18/02 62975122 $94.43
32621 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 4/18/02 62975130 ($2.52)
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $91.91
32622 MINNESOTA DEPT OF 1ST QTR 2002 WATER CONNECT F 4/18/02 $1,550.00
TOTAL FOR MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH $1,550.00
32623 MINNETONKA SOUND REPRlRENT MIXER - BUY AMP 4/18/02 SCC40202 $467.60
TOTAL FOR MINNETONKA SOUND $467.60
32624 NEWBERG, DALE & KA ADOPT-A-GARDEN 4/18/02 $50.00
TOTAL FOR NEWBERG, DALE & KAREN $50.00
32625 NEXTEL COMMUNICATI 4/18/02 $38.47
. 32625 NEXTEL COMMUNICATI 4/18/02 $38.47
TOTAL FOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $76.94
32626 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 4/18/02 75673552 $66.72
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COlA COMPANY $66.72
32627 POMMER COMPANY, I DAN PUZAK PLAQUE 4/18/02 49375 $64.88
TOTAL FOR POMMER COMPANY, INC. $64.88
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 109466-00 ($9.25)
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 109467-00 ($6.01 )
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 111167-00 $79.15
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 111196-00 $53.41
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 111298-00 $1,290.60
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 111299-00 $285.57
32628 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 4/18/02 111300-00 $1,280.Q1
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $2,973.48
32629 QWEST 4/18/02 $261.99
32629 QWEST 4/18/02 $99.05
. TOTAL FOR QWEST $361.04
32630 RUMPCA CO INC MAR 02 BRUSH DISPOSAL 4/18/02 $30.00
TOTAL FOR RUMPCA CO INC $30.00
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $17.22
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $17.22
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $17.22
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $36.94
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $36.94
32631 SAM'S CLUB 4/18/02 $36.95
TOTAL FOR SAM'S CLUB $162.49
32632 STEBBINS, NANCY ADOPT-A-GARDEN 4/18/02 $50.00
TOTAL FOR STEBBINS, NANCY $50.00
32633 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/18/02 256333 $11.50
32633 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/18/02 256333 $2,896.35
32633 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/18/02 256424 $12.85
32633 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/18/02 256424 $3,611.25
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $6,531.95
32634 TOTAL REGISTER SYS REGISTER TAPE 4/18/02 13303 $57.48
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS $57.48 "
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 0031-505-16 $7.38
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 0114-707-26 $14.76
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 0196-307-66 $296.59
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 0198-208-36 $405.01
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 0727-302-66 $265.01
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 1300-208-10 $97.03
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 1477-205-46 $246.00
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 1692-607-26 $543.53
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 1765-206-46 $35.39
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 2052-902-66 $13.75
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 2095-300-56 $1,591.07
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 2164-107-16 $15.45
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 2270-109-36 $297.42
32635 XCEL ENERGY 4/18/02 2486"903-26 $54.80
TOTAL FOR KCEI. ENERGY $3,883.19
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35428800 $40.21
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35428800 $57.07
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35428900 $40.85
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35428900 $15.07 .
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35429000 $41.41
32636 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 4/23/02 35459000 $45.83
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $240.44
32637 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 4/23/02 23477900 $167.00
32637 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 4/23/02 23478000 $85.30
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23478100 $268.55
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23504600 $26.28
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23504600 $240.00
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23504600 $291.10
32637 BELLBOY CO'RPORATI 4/23/02 23517100 $288.10
32637 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 4/23/02 23517200 $230.90
32637 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 4/23/02 23560200 $311.70
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23560300 $206.55
32637 BELLBOY CORPORATI 4/23/02 23560400 $540.30
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $2,655.78
32638 BERRY COFFEE CO 4/23/02 279569 $22.00 .
TOTAL FOR BERRY COFFEE CO $22.00
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 171721 $19.20
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 171721 $629.35
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 171722 $781.05
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 172091 $458.15
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 172369 $1,386.02
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 172370 $19.20
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 172370 $403.45
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 172943 $293.20
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 173177 $243.80
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 173178 $18.40
32639 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4/23/02 173178 $636.05
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $4,887.87
32640 DOCUMENT RESOURC PAYROLL CHECKS 4/23/02 125894 $535.75
TOTAL FOR DOCUMENT RESOURCES $535.75
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 221383 $337.75
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 221687 $1,050.85
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
. 32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 222659 $1,636.00
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 222660 $1,829.15
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 222661 $662.50
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 224890 $1,169.85
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 224891 $380.00
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 225584 $791.90
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 225585 $851.20
32641 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 4/23/02 227799 $998.80
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $9,708.00
32642 EDINA COURIERS LLC 4/23/02 47437 $21.00
TOTAL FOR EDINA COURIERS LLC $21.00
32643 GEEK SQUAD MAY MAl NT CONTRACT 4/23/02 $500.00
TOTAL FOR GEEK SQUAD $500.00
32644 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, I 4/23/02 45771 $376.00
32644 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, I 4/23/02 45772 $109.00
32644 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, I 4/23/02 45773 $362.00
TOTAL FOR GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC $847.00
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522683 $59.80
. 32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522683 $912.39
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522687 $295.33
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522688 $404.38
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522689 $544.90
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522695 $411.64
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522696 $29.90
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 522696 $476.42
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525216 $285.60
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525217 $610.10
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525218 $134.85
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525222 $25.7.83
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525435 $62.74
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525435 $1,702.21
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525439 $29.50
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525439 $648.80
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 525449 $1,211.76
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528384 $79.85
. 32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528385 $53.26
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528386 $147.43
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528606 $647.65
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528610 $121.83
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 528616 $225.84
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 584401 ($61.05)
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 585120 ($25.50)
32646 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 4/23/02 585121 ($8.50)
TOTAl~ FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $9,258.96
32647 HAWKINS WATER TRE 4/23/02 DM72472 $80.00
TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $80.00
32648 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/23/02 347730 $428.48
32648 HERMEL WHOLESALE 4/23/02 347730 $15.71
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $444.19
32649 HOISINGTON/KOEGLE FREEMAN PK ANALYSIS 4/23/02 $1,493.73
32649 HOISINGTON/KOEGLE VISIONING PROJECT 4/23/02 $2,564.86
TOTAL FOR HOISINGTON/KOEGLER GROUP $4,058.59
32650 HONEYWELL MONITORING SVC 5/1/02-10/31/02 4/23/02 1857HB522 $223.00
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR HONEYWELL $223.00 "
32651 INTELLIGENT PROOUC MUTT MITTS 4/23/02 3627CC $365.28
TOTAL FOR INTELLIGENT PRODUCTS INC $365.28
32652 J.H. LARSON ElECTRI BALLASTS FOR CITY HAll 4/23/02 4277576-01 $169.40
TOTAL FOR J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL CO $169.40
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383673 $23.95
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383673 $1,396.64
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383674 $121.20
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383675 $27.50
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383675 $60.00
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383676 $111.60
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383677 $2,364.73
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383678 $182.20
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383681 $1,365.52
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1383682 $107.50
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386616 $206.85
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386617 $59.95
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386617 $634.18
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386618 $124.30 .
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386619 $1,642.58
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386625 $217.80
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1386626 $1,083.55
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389654 $327.20
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389655 $747.75
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389656 $360.00
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389657 $20.75
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389658 $148.95
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389658 $585.88
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389659 $33.10
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389660 $1,043.80
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389665 $24.90
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389666 $198.60
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 1389666 $440.97
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 189802 ($60.00)
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 190211 ($64.41)
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 190212 ($22.44) .
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 190213 ($8.28)
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 190214 ($5.94)
32654 JOHNSON BROS L1au 4/23/02 190215 ($11.88)
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $13,489.00
32655 lK MTKA CONSERV. 01 2ND aTR 2002 lEVY PYMT 4/23/02 $6,579.30
TOTAL FOR LK MTKA CONSERV. DISTRICT $6,579.30
32656 MAMA MAMA LUNCH MTG - 1/21/02 4/23/02 371 $16.00
TOTAL FOR MAMA $16.00
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 394892 $1,955.60
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 394898 $1,318.94
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 394900 $2,212.50
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 394901 $12.45
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 397454 $1,160.90
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 397458 $944.50
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 397459 $38.50
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 397465 $405.50
32657 MARK VII 4/23/02 397466 $11.70
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR MARK VII $8,060.59
32658 METRO COUNCIL ENVI APRIL WASTEWATER 4/23/02 736579 $26,133.40
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $26,133.40
32659 MICRO WAREHOUSE BACKUP TAPES FOR SERVER 4/23/02 V002824300 $207.99
TOTAL FOR MICRO WAREHOUSE $207.99
32660 MINNESOTA UC FUND D BUHL UNEMPLOYMENT 4/23/02 $4.60
TOTAL FOR MINNESOTA UC FUND $4.60
32661 MUNITECH, INC. MAY 2002 SERVICE 4/23/02 7869 $2,550.00
32661 MUNITECH, INC. MAY 2002 SERVICE 4/23/02 7869 $5,950.00
TOTAL FOR MUNITECH, INC. $8,500.00
32662 NORTH STAR ICE 4/23/02 55210509 $65.40
TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $65.40
32663 OFFICE DEPOT CHAIRMAT 4/23/02 154775454-0 $35.56
32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 155197391-0 ($23.91 )
32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 155554467-0 $217.71
32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 155669982-0 ($10.54)
32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 155734647-0 $147.16
. 32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 156428791-0 $116.96
32663 OFFICE DEPOT 4/23/02 156452576-0 $21.28
TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $504.22
32664 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA 4/23/02 186024 $677.00
32664 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA 4/23/02 186025 $168.49
32664 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA 4/23/02 186026 $304.99
TOTAL FOR PAUST1S WINE COMPANY $1,150.48
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 818602 $95.00
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 818603 $60.00
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 818603 $82.75
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 818606 $27.95
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 818606 $65.00
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820822 $137.70
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820823 $231.65
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820823 $501.35
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820824 $101.03
. 32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820825 $549.05
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820825 $694.60
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820829 $46.50
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820830 $24.85
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 820830 $587.95
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823029 $586.94
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823030 $54.80
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823031 $545.40
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823032 $79.20
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823032 $233.70
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823037 $104.50
32666 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 4/23/02 823038 $365.10
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $5,175.02
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 256920 $2,978.75
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 256930 $547.00
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257011 $44.85
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257011 $1,190.65
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257466 $23.00
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257466 $1,728.80
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257554 $11.50
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257554 $631.40
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257664 $11.50
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257664 $734.45
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 257781 $39.00
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 258139 $25.70
32667 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 4/23/02 258139 $1,257.85
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $9,224.45
32668 TONKA BAY-CITY OF 1 ST QTR W AlSW 4/23/02 $249.00
32668 TONKA BAY-CITY OF 1 ST QTR W AlSW 4/23/02 $288.29
32668 TONKA BAY-CITY OF 1 ST QTR W AlSW 4/23/02 $97.90
TOTAL FOR TONKA BAY-CITY OF $635.19
32669 TRI COUNTY BEVERAG 4/23/02 113999 $142.00
TOTAL FOR TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY $142.00
32670 TWIN CITY WATER CLI BACTERIA ANALYSIS-MAR 02 4/23/02 8515 $60.00
TOTAL FOR TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC $60.00
32671 VINO ARTE 4/23/02 032902 $72.00
TOTAL FOR VINO ARTE $72.00
32672 WINE COMPANY (THE) 4/23/02 77146 $405.40
TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE) $405.40 .
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0074-000-16 $8.13
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0145-009-26 $14.14
32674 XCELENERGY 4/23/02 0191-308-36 $19.92
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0208-203-56 $5.71
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0234-748-37 $12.42
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0408-607-95 $60.03
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0615-308-36 $3.14
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0640-202-56 $16.39
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0675-505-16 $18.36
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0677-702-26 $437.56
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 0942-567-36 $36.68
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1285101-663 $14.62
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1350-001-36 $28.10
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1351-508-06 $377.43
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1373-808-26 $7.93
32674 XCELENERGY 4/23/02 1440-708-46 $155.54 .
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1541-203-60 $7.38
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1564-303-36 $8.00
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1605-305-56 $90.49
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1641-408-36 $54.55
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1724-866-54 $67.82
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1732-704-10 $2,446.42
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 1776-835-20 $29.19
32674 XCEL ENERGY 4/23/02 2001-503-26 $20.85
32674 XCELENERGY 4/23/02 2325-902-36 $28.10
32674 XCELENERGY 4/23/02 2397-003-96 $14.30
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY $3,983.20
TOTAL CHECKS $172,374.31
PAYROLL APPROVALS
For 4/22/02 Council Meeting
.
Prepared by: (!~ 1&.
Catherine BIke, Sr. Accountant
Reviewed by: ~~
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director
.Aw~
Approved by: .
Craig Da son, City Administrator
.
Date: if-/~-o~
Date: ~4;;z-
Date: f!trloz-
Payroll Register
-J.'
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
1469 BAILEY BOYD C 1,110.07 4/9/02
1470 BURTON BONNIE M 1,690.41 4/9/02
1471 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,061.36 4/9/02
1472 EISCHENS JAMES E 80Ll7 4/9/02
1473 ELKE CATHERINE M 752.10 4/9/02
1474 FASCHING PATRICIA L 787.05 4/9/02
1475 GROUT TWILA R 766.13 4/9/02
1476 HELLING PAMELA J 296.93 4/9/02
1477 JOHNSON DENNIS D 1,148.51 4/9/02
1478 KARELS PAUL C 149.20 4/9/02
1479 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,012.92 4/9/02
1480 MASON BRADLEY J 1,047.73 4/9/02
1481 MOORE JULIE K 105.61 4/9/02
1482 MOTTER BROOKE A 601.l2 4/9/02 .
1483 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,013.20 4/9/02
1484 PANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,078.12 4/9/02
1485 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,416.91 4/9/02
1486 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,197.68 4/9/02
1487 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 645.69 4/9/02
1488 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 1,014.99 4/9/02
1489 STARK BRUCE H 934.16 4/9/02
1490 SWANDBY DONALD. R 1,202.40 4/9/02
1491 TOWER TERRY R 859.53 4/9/02
1492 ZAVADA MITCHELL C 798.51 4/9/02
217240 BAKER RICHARD M 67.62 4/9/02
217241 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,864.12 4/9/02
217242 CURTIS JOHN N 152.15 4/9/02 .
217243 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,605.20 4/9/02
217244 DUFFY DAVID C 145.68 4/9/02
217245 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 1,097.68 4/9/02
217246 HIRSCH DANA M 111.78 4/9/02
217247 LATTERNER SUSAN M 298.48 4/9/02
217248 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 4/9/02
217249 MELCHER THOMAS J 81.14 4/9/02
217250 OLIVEIRA CHRISTOPHER L 205.15 4/9/02
217251 PLATHE CRAIG V 209.97 4/9/02
217252 THURSTON DOROTHY M 54.10 4/9/02
217253 WANNINGER NICHOLE C 53.98 4/9/02
Total of Checks $27,478.65
Thursday, April 18, 2002
Page 1 oft
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
Date:
April 17, 2002
Re:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members -
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director/Treasurer ~
Craig Dawson, City Administrator LA>
2002 Fee Schedule Update
To:
From:
.
Background
The Shorewood City Council is authorized to set fees from time to time by resolution. Staff recently
reviewed certain fees the city charges for various licenses, permits and miscellaneous services and is
recommending the following changes to the 2002 fee schedQle.
DescriTJtion Old Fee New Fee
2002 Spring Clean-Up Fees
Water Softners 20.00
Auto Tires with rims 7.00 5.00 '
. Auto Tires without rims 4.00 5.00
Tri-Annual Rental Housing License Fee, per unit
(includes up to 3 inspections/unit) Ref. 1004.03(3) 35.00 60.00
Residential Roofing Permit 50.00 75.00
Residential Siding Permit 50.00 75.00
Mechanical Permit 2% of work, $20/min. State Statute or 2.5%
of work, $35/min.
Plumbing Permit $7/fixture, $20/min State Statute or $15/
fixture, $35/min
Recommended Council Action
Staff recommends that the Council adopt the proposed resolution 'Setting License, Permit, Service
Charges and Miscellaneous Fees. '
ft
t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~3B
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION SETTING LICENSE, PERMIT,
SERVICE CHARGES AND MIS'CELLANEOUS FEES
WHEREAS, the fees that residents shall pay to the city for the licenses, permits,
services charges and miscellaneous fees shall be determined from time to time by the
Shorewood City Council; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood that certain fees are set as follows:
Descriotion
2002 Spring Clean-Up Fees:
Water Softeners
Auto Tires with rims
Auto Tires without rims
New Fee
20.00
5.00
5.00
.
Tri-Annual Rental Housing License Fee, per unit
(includes up to 3 inspections/unit) Ref. 1004.03(3)
60.00
Residential Roofing Permit
75.00
Residential Siding Permit
75.00
Mechanical Permit
State Statute or 2.5% of work, $35/min.
Plumbing Permit
State Statute or $15/ fixture, $35/min.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
22nd day of April 2002.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 18, 2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Larry Brown, Public Works Director
RE: Spring Clean-Up Contract for Services
The details of the Contract for the May 18, 2002 Spring Clean-up Day will be provided
at the Council meeting on Monday evening.
.
:If~C-
n
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 17,2002
RE:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director ~
Craig Dawson, City Administrator ot
Accrued Vacation Layout
TO:
FROM:
.
Discussion of Issues.
City policy permits employees at year-end to carry-over two (2) times the rate of their annual
vacation accrual. If more than this amount is carried over and is not used, the policy states that
the employee will lose the additional accrued vacation time.
.
This past year, there were two employees who had extraordinary circumstances that did not
permit them to take vacation time off. Building Inspector Joe pazandak was very busy with
extra inspection activity resulting from hail and storm damage and City Engineer Larry Brown
was without a Public Works Foreman or an Engineering Technician most of the year. Both are
dedicated employees who did not feel comfortable taking time off because of their workloads
this year.
Accordingly, an administrative decision was made to pay down their accrued vacation time this
one time only to the level they would have been allowed to carry over. The gross amount paid
to each employee was about $3,000 and is subject to the usual payroll withholding requirements.
Each employee now has two (2) times his annual vacation accrual in the bank plus any time
accrued so far during 2002. During the course of the audit, the auditor commented that since this
represented a deviation from standard policy of "use it or lose it", specific council approval
should be obtained.
Recommended Council Action
Staff recommends that the Council authorize retroactively the payment of accrued vacation time
to employees Larry Brown and Joe pazandak by a simple motion, with the understanding that
this payout is a one time only event.
;f 3D
ft
'-~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
City Council
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ot:>
April 18, 2002
TO:
FROM:
.
SUBJECT: Authorization of Services, HMC Inc.
The Council set has placed priority on updating the City's personnel systems, including the
establishment of a new performance assessment system. In its discussion of goals for the city
administrator, the Council indicated its agreement with my intention to engage a consultant to
provide assistance and the necessary expertise for this project. Sufficient funds were available in the
Professional Services program budget to engage these services.
.
The City auditor has been conducting its fieldwork in City Hall recently, and commented that it may
be preferable on matters like this one to have specific City Council authorization. Given Council's
prior concurrence with this approach, and the very reasonable $2,250 fee proposed by HMC, Inc., I
believed that Council approval was implicit with my decision to engage these services. In
accordance with his recommendation, I am placing this matter on the Council agenda for express
authorization.
The principal ofHMC, Inc., Paul Ness, has prior experience with the League of Minnesota Cities and
with smaller municipalities around the metropolitan area and the rest of the state. He is assisting the
staff with updating position descriptions and ensuring their conformance with legal requirements, and
with the development of a performance assessment process and the necessary forms to go with it.
Weare on a track to have the system fully in place by the end of the second quarter of 2002.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the engagement of consultant services with
HMC, Inc., per its proposal (attached).
ft
toJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#3E
,.., HMC Inc. .....
HELPING MINNESOTA CITIES INC.
Serving Your Human Resources Needs
Job
Descriptions
Job
Evaluation
Pay/Step
Structures
Pay Equity
Compliance
Personnel
Policies
Performance
Management
Hiring
Assistance
February 6, 2002
PAUL N. NESS
Personnel Specialist
Mr. Craig Dawson, Administrator
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331-8926
frr- (c5 ,...... n ~., ....-.
O ::'":?, C;; ;:;~i. I . ~;; ~
._ _...___ ..... L ~I) L...::>
r----- -............... ...... '0'_'" --l
l FEB 7 2002
L
Dear Craig:
I submit this letter outlining my proposal to assist the City with two projects: the
refinement of select position descriptions and the development of a performance
manag~ment system for your management team. I offer these not-to"exceed prices:
Project A: Job Description Refinement $ 750.00
Project B: Performance Management System $1,500.00
.
I base the job description work on five department head positions and assume we
would not be using a questionnaire-based process. Your position description would
also be revised. During this project, I will lead a process to review current job
descriptions to make appropriate improvements. The review will be based on input
from employees and you, along with feedback and comments from me.
The performance management work offers off-the-shelf materials that we will adapt to
yoursp~c.ific n~eds. The project consists of three meetings. The first meeting is used
to' mttoduce the project, distribute preliminary materials, and discuss initial design
considerations.Th~ second meeting is used to make decisions about various system
attributes. The third'meeting is used to educate users on the system.' My office time
will be used to incorporate changes into the system manual and appraisal form. The
City is expeCted to initially develop perf'Ormance g'Oals specific to each position, on
which I will provide some feedback. .
.
A fuller review of City-developed performance goals would cost an additional $450.
A Consultant-led process to develop position-specific performance goals would cost an
additional $900. Of course, as part of the base services, I will provide to'Ols by which
to develop goals and focus the job description' work 'On this purpose.
Please. call me with any need for clarification or additional information.
..' \.'.
SINCEREL V,
~~~~~.
Paul N Ness
14083 Delta Court. Rosemount, MN 55068-4169
Telephone: (651) 423-4665' Fax: (651) 322-7986' E-mail: HMCInc@aol.com
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 19,2002
TO:
.
FROM:
cc:
RE:
As the applicant has met the licensing requirements, -staff recommends approval of the
Resolution issuing a license to the Shorewood Market to sell tobacco products.
Council Action:
Approval of a Resolution issuing a license to Shorewood Market to sell tobacco products.
n
~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-4f3P
ctcU.1J.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSE TO RETAILER
TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Section 302 provides for the licensing of the sale of
tobacco products in the City; and
WHEREAS, said Code provides that an applicant shall complete an application, and shall pay a
licensing fee; and
WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed an application and paid the
appropriate fee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
.
That a License for the sale of tobacco products be issued for a term of one year, from November
1, 2001 to October 31, 2002 consistent with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 302 of
the Shorewood City Code, to the following applicant:
Applicant
Address
Shorewood Market
5680 Manitou Road
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood this 22nd day of April, 2002.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
.
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
,"
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
,.
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www,cLshorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 16, 2002
RE:
Mayor and City Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk 9~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF WARDS
TO:
FROM:
.
1) City Attorney Clarification on Establishing Wards
The attached memorandum from City Attorney Tim Keane provides clarification on questions relating
to the Special Legislation on establishing wards and the time schedule for doing so.
2) Draft Ordinance for Establishing Wards
At the April 8 pubic hearing on the consideration of establishing wards, the City Council discussed options for
staggering of council member terms to incorporate ward elections. Council indicated that ifit were to establish
wards, it preferred the following system for incorporating ward elections:
.
2002 - Elections remain at-large with 2-year terms
2004 - Ward elections held for all 4 wards with terms staggered as follows:
Wards 1 and 3 -two-year ward terms
Wards 2 and 4 - four-year ward terms
Council did not indicate any changes to the Ward Boundary Map as presented at the April 8 meeting.
The attached Draft Ordinance includes the staggering of terms as noted above and the Ward Plan presented at the
April 8 public hearing.
City Council Action
The City Council may close the public hearing or continue it to a date no later than April 30,2002
or
The City Council may approve an Ordinance Amending Chapter 106 of the City Code Relating to
Municipal Elections
or
The City Council may provide further direction to staff regarding the preparation of alternate ordinances
to effect the ward system, specifically relating to ward boundaries and/or the schedule to implement
staggered terms.
ft
~.1 PRINTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER
-:tSA
~
Larkin Hoffman
4/17/2002 4:24
PAGE 2/3
RightFax
MEMORANDUM
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Attorneys at Law
1500 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
TelePhone: (952) 835.3800
FAX: (952) 896-3333
TO:
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Jean Panchyshyn, City Clerk
FROM:
Tim Keane, City Attorney
DATE:
April 15, 2002
RE:
Ward Formation Issues
Our File No. 24,444~ 14
.
This memorandum is in response to your fonow-up inquiries relating to the establishment of
wards in the City of Shorewood. Specifically you ask:
1.) Did the Special Legislation Chapter 257 of 2000 Laws of Minnesota authorizing
the establishment of wards. obligate the City to establish wards upon the
acceptance and certification of the Special Legislation in August 2000?
2.) Does Minnesota Statutes Section 204B.135 limit the City of Shorewood to the
creation of wards under the special legislation only in the year 2002?
The responses below are based upon research of Minnesota election laws set forth in
Chapters 204 and 205, research of Minnesota Statutes enabling legislation set forth in
Chapter 412 and in consultation with Mr. Randall Cwming of the Minnesota Secretary of State's
office.
.
The response to the first inquiry is that the clear language of the enabling legislation as well as
the legislative history of the request supports the conclusion that the Special Legislation
authorizing the City of Shorewood to create a ward system of representation was clearly
perm:issive and does not obligate the City to implement a ward system.
The response to the second question arises from Minnesota Statutes Section 204B.135 which
provides in relevant part:
"A City that elects its Council members by wards may not
redistrict those wards before the legislature has been redistricted in
a year ending in 1 or 2. The wards must be redistricted within
60 days after the legislature has been redistricted or at least
19 weeks before the date ofthe primary election in the year ending
in 2, whichever is first."
.
.
t:.arkin Hoffman
4/17/2002 4:24
PAGE 3/3
RightFax
The guidance in this statute is to require cities operating under a ward system to redistrict local
wards within a reasonable window of time after the establishment of legislative wards
boundaries after each decennial census. The rationale for such requirement is clear - the local
redistricting to adjust for boundaries after the decennial census should take place prior to the
primary of the fIrst general election after the census. These adjustments in ward boundaries must
reflect shifts in population and other principles of balance and fairness in establishing ward
boundaries.
In the present case, the City of Shorewood is not redistricting its wards based upon population
shifts and changes. Shorewood is considering, forthe first time, the implementation of a new
ward system. While I believe it is prudent for the City to undertake the public discussion and
consideration of the implementation ofa ward system in a timely fashion, it is my opinion the
City is not obliged to confonn to the time requirements of the "window" prescribed for
redistricting in Minnesota Statutes Section 204B.135. If the City elects to implement the wards in
2002, it must be accomplished by April 30. If the City does not act this year, the City may later
implement a ward system consistent with the Special Legislation.
Should you have any questions relating to the foregoing, please contact me at your convenience.
bkh
760101.1
2.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 106 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY
CODE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
Section 1. Section 106.01 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following:
106.01: BIENNIAL ELECTIONS: Pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 2000,
Chapter 257, the City of Shorewood shall provide for election of city council members by
wards and may provide for staggering of terms. Minnesota Statutes Sections 204B.135
and 205.84. The ward boundaries and staggering of terms shall be as follows:
Subd. 1
WARD BOUNDARIES
W~l .
All of the City lying west of Cathcart Drive, north of Smithtown Road and west of
Eureka Road, described as follows:
Commencing at the point of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka that intersects with
the southerly boundary of the City, easterly to the intersection of Cathcart Drive
and West 62nd Street, northerly along Cathcart Drive to its intersection with
Smithtown Road, easterly along Smithtown Road to its intersection with Eureka
Road, northerly along Eureka Road to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, westerly
along said shoreline to the point of beginning; and Goose Island, Spray Island,
Shady Island and that part of Enchanted Island that lies within the City limits.
Ward 2
All of the City lying east of Cathcart Drive, south of Smithtown Road, east of
Eureka Road and north of Yellowstone Trail to the northerly City limits,
described as follows:
.
Commencing at the intersection of Cathcart Drive and West 62nd Street, easterly
along the southerly border of the City limits to its intersection with State Highway
7, easterly along State Highway 7 to its intersection with Yellowstone Trail,
easterly along Yellowstone Trail to the ShorewoodJExcelsior City border,
northerly along the ShorewoodJExcelsior City border to the shoreline of Lake
Minnetonka, westerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the
ShorewoodlTonka Bay City border, westerly along the ShorewoodITonka Bay
City border to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, westerly along the shoreline of
Lake Minnetonka to its intersection with Eureka Road, southerly along Eureka
Road to its intersection with Smithtown Road, westerly along Smithtown Road to
its intersection with Cathcart Drive, southerly along Cathcart Drive to the point of
beginning; and including Duck Island, Frog Island, and Gale Island.
..
.
.
>>
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
Page 2
Ward 3
All of the City lying east of the of the southerly border of the City limits and its
intersection with State Highway 7, south of Yellowstone Trail, south of Radisson
Road, and south of Covington Road, described as follows:
Commencing at the southerly border of the City limits from its intersection with
State Highway 7, easterly along the southerly border of the City limits to the
southeast corner of the City limits, northerly along Vine Hill Road to its
intersection with Covington Road, westerly along Covington Road to its
intersection with Radisson Road, westerly along Radisson Road to the
ShorewoodJExcelsior City border, westerly along the ShorewoodJExcelsior City
border to its intersection with Yellowstone Trail, westerly along Yellowstone
Trail to its intersection with State Highway 7, westerly along State Highway 7 to
the point of beginning.
Ward 4
All of the City lying north of Radisson Road and north of Covington Road.
Subd.2
A WARD MAP IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A.
Subd.3
STAGGERING OF TERMS
Effective with the 2002 Municipal Election, the following shall be the schedule
for the staggering of terms to incorporate ward elections:
2002 Election
2004 Election
Elections remain at-large in 2002, with two-year terms
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for two-year terms
Elect Wards 2 and 4 for four-year terms
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for four-year terms
2006 Election
Section 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and become effective on
September 10, 2002 and for the conduct of the September 10, 2002 election.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22nd
day of April 2002.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG w. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
"
..
I>
~
"
W11~1{"1
~'
---
~ R liden
~ -
,
-
c-'
..... '-
pW1P
r
...........
!
N
--
........
r-=
~
Ie
.,
", I:,'.,'..,""""'"
D:: ',.'
III ."".,
..
f':.' A
'~:i.'
Fe" ,
,.
"
~~
t
~
-
~
~. ......".\.t~
" .......'.....
............' . i.'"",'
, i/i .i ......'.
.IIJI1' c... :; ".'
~8 '.....,' .
" .\1 i
". ......
.... " ..'
....,.... . '.. ;.'
.... :- '. 'i..
'.:. ...... .. ,.i
'".' .,'
s ~
C) / ;::..,.,.,'"
.. ,.........'. ''',
..... ",".
~
,
~ '. 1,11
~ (, ..
Minnewashta Church
District
SHRW1
SHRW2
SHRW3
SHRW4
Population
0.000
1877.000
1879.000
1967.000
1677.000
,
Deviation
-1,850
27
29
117
-173
,0'
.
:,:.. l~~- L?
-~Y ..\...
% Deviation
-100%
1.46%
1.57%
6.32%
-9.35%
...
~
--
~
'>
_ J
---.
\
......
...-
Ill..... ~
...
;",
':
(
...
. ":l~
...
.:'.C,". "'.':';;
.'.'ClW.
<iliaD"
1-""'"
......' ',.
,',1'
< l..........
'\;"
\'
. \. ' li:o:.a
fY'"
.., "
-
Our Saillor"s
LutheranC eh
,,~1
.~,
Wi Pi - Ward 1, Precinct 1
W1P2 - Ward 1, Precinct 2
W2P1 - Ward 2, Precinct 1
W3P1 - Ward 3, Precinct 1
W4P1 - Ward 4, Precinct 1
. Current Council Members
@ Current Polling Sites
* Potential Polling Sites- Ward 3
~
4
~t
(~,.. C)I
'~ ~"';.,'.".. ....'
Q ..'.i......'.....,...,',... .',
.",1. .'.
.1
.'
r.:. ......,'. I ........,
'. ...u.
~
~t
W.'.
~ ,..(.;.,-....',..
'~ .~11
.. ,.' .
l.,~.,...".......
l,A
Excelsior
covenant~
Chul'.9l..
r ,....... ".'
, "'/0() 11:""
" .... ."
....... :"
"" '
.....,..' .....'.....:.'.. ~.... ..........,...
~ ~.....,... '; """ l, /,'," ..,..... .........'.'
"' .:,. i...... .....'..:.'..'
~ J ~,... ':.... .,.. '.'
- .....;...;..' ;- ....' ,.".........,....' .....'"..
=~~~ ~ ~t ~:~ .....:
_ ~,~.b-~
.. rc.d .. ...., 'TC11.-;- .'
I.~ ' , ~ St.J6hntl\eBaI ~ ~
V 1 " .~ ) ....Cathollc Church
....._~
/ "W3P'
1Iloo.:: \' ' 1
I,:
,
/;
C!
\
..
.
City of
Shorewood
Ward and
Precinct Plan
effective September 10, 2002
EXHIBIT A
...
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DA TE:
April 18, 2002
.
TO:
cc:
Mayor and City Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk9f
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator (jy
RESIDENT'S RESPONSES TO EST ABLISIDNG WARDS
FROM:
RE:
Attached are the responses received to date from Shorewood residents who responded to the
Public Hearing Notice on establishing wards.
.
The reference to options in the attached responses refer to the options for staggering of terms.
They are:
Option 1 - election of two wards in 2002; current council members would complete the
remaining two years of their at-large appointments.
Option 2 -election of all four wards with staggered terms. 2002 elections would remain
at-large for two-year terms; 2004 elections would be held for all four wards with
staggered terms, initially two wards would have two-year terms and two wards
would have four-year terms.
Option 3 - make no changes to the current election system; no wards.
ft
'-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
::IF 511
11t!.5; de fJ f C o/V}!fL()f1fs
Pat Fasching
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dimacbry@aol.com
Saturday, March 23, 200210:25 AM
cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
city wards
We think the ward system would be a good way to improve the representation of
the people. Diane and Fred Dresser, 5480 Gideon's Lane
Pat Fasching
From: LARRY L BUESGENS [lIbuesgens@email.msn.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:31 PM
To: cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Subject: city wards
I would prefer option 1
Thank you,
Carol Buesgens
.,
Page 1 of 1
~
~
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Pat t:asching
From: Bradley Yost [byost@flytetyme.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 12:46 PM
To: City Hall
Subject: Establishing City Wards
I would like to ante up to have option #2 (two) initiated in the coming election.
thanks,
Brad Yost
.
Pat Fasching
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Javier Barberena Obarberena1 @mchsLcom]
Saturday, March 23, 2002 1 :49 PM
'City Hall - Shorewood'
CITY WARDS - COMMENTS
I support Option 2 for the establishing of the new four-ward system in the city.
~vier Barberena
~75 Brentridge Dr.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Home (952)401-8865
Cell (612)819-5630
Work (952)324-0967
Fax (775)406-2848
jbarberena1@mchsLcom
Page 1 of 1
Pat Fasching
From: Bill Persson [BiIlPersson@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 9:28 AM
To: cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Subject: Wards
I may not be able to attend the public hearing on 4/8. I think the wards are a great idea. The
way the city is spread out, and the unique problems and concerns for each area make it a
perfect candidate for the system. The Ward map presented looks fine. I would vote for option 2
for ward seat appointment.
Sincerely,
Bill & Ruth Ann Persson
20115 Excelsior Blvd
Ward W4Pl
~
.
Jean Panchyshyn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Fasching
Monday, March 25, 2002 11 :22 AM
Jean Panchyshyn
WARD SYSTEM
G. SEBRING FROM AMESBURY WEST WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS HIS OPINION ABOUT THE WARD SYSTEM. HE.
IS IN FAVOR OF PASSING THIS SYSTEM. HE FEELS WE WOULD GET BETTER REPRESENTATION WITH THIS
SYSTEM RATHER THAN OUR CANDIDATES HIDING BEHIND THE "AT LARGE" SYSTEM.
3-25-02 PER PHONE CALL 11 :30am
Jean Panchyshyn
_.'"",""..._.___... ""'''M _ _"._____......,_.._..._..._._....__.. .m_ __".,..........___....._ _.__.M....,.."".................. ...... ."".MM..M.M._.m"'.................. ........
_............................
From: Pat Fasching
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Jean Panchyshyn
Subject: FW: City Wards
-----Original Message-----
From: KARL SCHUELE [mailto:shorewoodcomputer@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:25 PM
To: cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Subject: City Wards
Page 1 of 1
Almost any ward system would give us the feeling the City knows we are out here on Enchanted
Island.
e
Great Idea.
Karl Schuele
4320 Enchanted Dr
Pat Fasching
From: Ken Huskins [ken.huskins@sopheon.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 6:03 PM
To: 'cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us'
Subject: Regarding Establishing City Wards
eI would like to cast my and my wife's support for Option 2 regarding
establishing city wards. This option appears to start all of the wards off
evenly with elected representation. So long as the 2 wards that begin with 2
year terms permit whoever the incumbent is to be eligible to be elected back
to the position, we believe it is fair.
Thank you.
Kenneth R. Huskins
Ruth R. Lane
24075 Mary Lake Trail
Shorewood, MN 55331
Res. Phone: 952-935-2998
Pat Fasching
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jim Pisula Udpisula@ix.netcom.com]
Monday, April 08, 20024:27 PM
cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
One At-large Council, Please (and hold the ketchup)
Here it is!!
------ Forwarded Message
From: Jim pisula <jdpisula@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:08:37 -0500
To: Shorewood City Offices <cityhall@shorewood.state.net>
Subject: One At-large Council, Please (and hold the ketchup)
08 April 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
.
Dear Mayor Love and Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Turgeon and Zerby:
since I can't attend the hearing this evening on instituting a ward system,
I'm submitting my opinion in writing.
with the greatest respect to each and everyone of
solution in search of a problem. Even though I've
still don't understand why it's being considered.
things to do?
you, I feel this is a
read the material, I
Don't we have other
The main reasons to implement a ward system are diverse geography,
population characteristics or neighborhood dynamics from one section of the
city to another. While Shorewood census tracts (as indicated by PRIZM
clusters) indicate differences in lifestyle and income, there are many more
factors in common than in conflict. Some common citywide Shorewood
demographic factors are much higher median income levels than the Metro
area, rapidly appreciating home values, concern for the environment, a
desire to maintain their property and a desire to protect their
neighborhoods from encroachment.
.
While the city has diversity of opinion, it's most determined by factors
other than neighborhood. More effective segmentation criteria would be
average age of adult household residents, presence of minor children in the
home, lakefront residence and length of time living in Shorewood -- however,
you can't implement wards based on these criteria. Shorewood isn't
Minneapolis, where the elected body needs to consider wide disparities in
neighborhoods from the North Side to Downtown to the Lakes area to
Cedar-Riverside. It's not even Bloomington with its inner-ring-suburban
east end and very affluent west end.
Although our city is:somewhat spread out (and younger) when compared to its
immediate South Lake:neighbors of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood and Tonka
Bay, it's not so large as to be unwieldy at 6 miles from one end to the
other. The number of households, at 2,400, isn't an overwhelming number.
Minneapolis wards have 25,000 to 30,000 residents each.
Here are some other factors to consider:
1. A ward system would, I feel, DECREASE residents' power to effect change
1
in city policy through changing elected officials. In three recent
elections, 1990, 1996 and 1998, incumbent council blocs were voted out as a
. result of citizen wishes centered around specific factors -- Old Market
Road, Route 7 retail development and city water extension, to name three.
Although issues differed in each campaign, significant city policy changes
followed each election.
2. The quality of the council could be adversely affected ina ward system.
The idea seems to be that more residents don't run for office because it's
perceived to be too much effort to campaign outside their immediate and
adjacent neighborhoods. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm not
encouraged by representation that is so recruited. Again, we aren't talking
about Minneapolis here.
3. To the extent that our city differs from one end to the other, council
is less informed as a body by not being required to seek votes across the
city. Each of you has campaigned across the city and you are better
representatives for it, you have learned the people and whatever local
issues exist. While you may be more familiar with your own neighborhoods,
each of you know something about all the areas. If residents feel their
neighborhood is not represented well, they have the option to run for office
-- and they, like you in the past, would be better through campaigning
across the city.
. like the system the way it is now -- residents who care about the city,
ho believe they have something to offer and are willing to give their time,
run and are elected based on their ability to persuade voters citywide.
They know more and serve us better through their efforts.
Yes, we now have a mayor and council that hail from the west end. From 1991
to 1995, half the Council came from the Sweetwater area; in 1996, we had two
Christmas Lake Councilmembers and in 1998, we even had next-door-neighbor
Councilmembers, both as a result of a resignation and appointment. No east
end residents have run since 1996; I find it difficult to believe the
reason's because citywide campaigning is too onerous. Nothing stopped
anyone from filing; couldn't it be said that Shorewood east end residents
aren't displeased with the representation they've received?
You don't need to fix what's not broken.
Very truly yours,
~i~ pisula
26175 Shorewood Oaks Drive
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Phone
Fax
Email
(952) 474-1949
(952) 380-1158
jdpisula@ix.netcom.com
------ End of Forwarded Message
2
Jean Panchyshyn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Fasching
Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:20 AM
Jean Panchyshyn
FW: If Wards Are Chosen...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim pisula [mailto:jdpisula@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Jean
Subject: If Wards Are Chosen...
08 April 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
.
Dear Mayor Love and Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Turgeon and Zerby:
If you MUST establish wards, I would strongly favor a delineation that
maintains neighborhood boundaries (planning districts, right?) at the
expense of exactly equal pops. (I presume the State provides such leeway
even though the Federal government doesn't permit it in Congressional or
state legislature seats.)
I have no relevant opinion on implementation.
Jim pisula
26175 Shorewood Oaks Drive
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Phone
Fax
Email
(952) 474-1949
(952) 380-1158
jdpisula@ix.netcom.com
.
1
. Jean Panchyshyn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Fasching
Wednesday, April 1 0, 20027:42 AM
Jean Panchyshyn
FW: More on Wards vs. At-Large
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim pisula [mailto:jdpisula@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:14 PM
To: Jean
Subject: More on Wards vs. At-Large
09 April 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Shorewood
.755 Country Club Road
horewood, Minnesota 55331
Dear Mayor Love and Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Turgeon and Zerby:
Something else to consider as you wrestle with this issue:
If things are going as desired, busy residents are less likely to make time
to participate in civil activities. They feel less need to add their voices
to the chorus.
Some of you ran because you wanted to make specific change in the status quo
ante. The relevant issues could have been citywide, things that affected
your neighborhood alone or driven by other factors. Regardless, you felt
motivated to do something -- each of you got involved because you wanted
specific changes made.
.ince the east end has been relatively quiet and doesn't have any big
evelopment proposals or intrusive highways or such activity on the horizon,
~t's less likely to generate individuals with a desire to act for change.
When things are relatively quiet, other factors will affect residents'
individual desire to serve. Given the community we live in -- suburban,
pretty well off, etc. -- it's not unusual to have limited numbers of
residents interested in serving. I'm certain that if a Cub store were
proposed for the corner of Old Market Road and Route 7, you would have folks
coming out of the woodwork ready to run for Council to stop it. Remember
what happened in 1990 when Old Market Road was connected to Route 7? Two
southeast residents ran and were elected to Council.
Later,
Jim pisula
1
April 8,2002
Phone Comment from
Jenny Brown
4560 Enchanted Point
474-1717
RE: Ward System
She is concerned about whether or not an island person would be able to become elected to a
ward, since their population is so small.
She doesn't know if adopting a Ward system will give the island people any better opportunity
for their voices to be heard. She feels they are an appendage.
.
.
.
.
.
,~..
----- Original Message _____
From: David McCuskey
To: cityhall@acLshorewood.mn.us
Cc: David McCuskey
Sent: Monday, April 08, 20027:00 PM
Subject: Proposed Ward System for City Council Elections
To: Mayor and Council
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
From: David L. McCuskey
5250 Howards Point Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Telephone: (952) 474-5076
Fax: (952) 470-4490
Email: im9.Q.!,Jj)keyHstmQhsLcQ.!J1
Re: Proposed Ward System for City Council
I respectfully urge the Shorewood City Council to reject both Options 1 and
2 and to choose, instead, Option 3, Le., no changes to the current election
system.
It has not been demonstrated that the current system is broken. There is
no need to change it. After all, this is not New York City, Chicago or
Minneapolis. Shorewood is not large, either in area or in population, and it and
its citizens are relatively homogeneous, ethnically and economically. There is no
reason to assume that a Council member from one part of the city would not
able understand and address problems arising in some other part of the city. The
present at-large system encourages candidates to develop a citywide
viewpoint; a ward system would encourage narrow, parochial viewpoints. The
present sytem allows the voters, if they are dissatisfied with the incumbents, to
"throw the rascals out.1I That has, in fact, happened a number of times in the
past, as anyone with historical knowledge of Shorewood could tell you. A ward
system would be, in reality, an incumbent protection system. A ward system,
-,.
coupled with staggered terms, would make it extremely difficult, as a practical
matter, to effect meaningful changes in the makeup of the Council when such
changes are needed.
If you want a poster child for the ward system of city government, just take
a look at the City of Minneapolis. Those who are familiar with how that city
operates could tell you that it is probably the most disfunctional city government
in the State of Minnesota. Over the years, Minneapolis city council members
have proved to be the most petty, parochial, horse trading, turf protecting and
politically vindictive public servants imaginable, and it is extremely difficult to
dislodge them.
The time has not come, and will probably never come, for the City of
Shorewood to institute a ward system for the election of council members.
Please, don't go there, if you are truly for good, responsible city government.
Page 1 of 1
..
Jean Panchyshyn
. --.. -.--..........., -.------.-.. , -......... .....................-.-..-......,.......... -........ .--..--..."............. ..--
From: Pat Fasching
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Jean Panchyshyn
Subject: FW: city wards public hearing
-----Original Message-----
From: bob bye [mailto:bobobye@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 6:28 PM
To: cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us
Subject: city wards public hearing
The establishment of a ward system for Shorewood is a very smart idea. It is time. It makes
sense. Local, local, local, - community, community, community - It will enhance
communication, which in turn, will strengthen neighorhood interaction.
I vote to move forward to allow me and my neighbors to contribute to our local destiny. .
Bob Bye
4810 Rustic way
Scott Brown
4560 Enchanted Point
Phone message 4/9/02
Re: Proposed Ward System
.
I think a ward system is fantastic, unfortunately it doesn't help out those of us on the island who
feel underrepresented at all times. We think that whatever ward we have to be in should be
smaller on the opposing side or else have the island in and of itself, and I understand that might
require more wards to make it fair. Right now we are grossly outnumbered and
underrepresented, but I like the idea of wards. Thank you.
4/9/02
~
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
City Council
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator~
Jean Panchyshyn, Deputy City ClerlyJ;
April 4, 2002 ljr
Public Hearing re: Establishment of Ward Election to City Council
DATE:
SUBJECT:
.
In 2000, the City of Shorewood sought special legislation to change election of members of the City
Council from an at-large basis to a ward basis. One of the reasons in support of wards was to ensure
that the broad (six-mile-wide) community be represented on the City Council.
In the 2000 session, the Legislature enacted a law that would permit the City of Shorewood to adopt
an ordinance to establish a ward basis for election to positionson the City Council. The Act further
stated that the ordinance could accomplish a "staggered" term of offices - i.e., two of the four
Council positions would be elected alternately at every general election. The mayoral office would
continue to be a two-year, at-large position.
.
The Act did not specify when the City Council could consider such an ordinance, nor the first
election at which it would take effect. The City Council did decide to consider the 2002 election as
the implementation of the ward system. It has recently reviewed possible ward maps and ways to
begin ward Council seats with staggered terms, but has not been able to take action until the new
legislative and congressional districts were established. On March 19,2002, the Minnesota Court-
established districts placed Shorewood entirely within the 3rd Congressional District and Legislative
District 33B. The Council is now following the statutory process wherein it must (a) hold a public
hearing on new ward boundaries, and (b). adopt an ordinance by April 30, 2002, in order for the
transition to a ward system be in effect for the 2002 elections.
Wards (e:eoe:raphically): State law requires that wards be established that are
1) As even in population as practicable;
2) Compact; and
3) Contiguous
Staff has prepared several alternatives using "Maptitude" software from Hennepin County. The maps
are organized on "census blocks", which are the smallest units that can be used for population counts.
The possible four wards were also cognizant of "natural" boundaries. While the "ideal" population
per ward is 1,850 residents (based on a City population of 7,400), through work session discussion
Council believed that a variation of:!: 1 0 percent would be practicable.
{) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#5A
Aprl I B /VI c:e..+i n~
'co
00
~
-
.....
~
o
U
~oo
o ~
..... .....
~~
Q) Q)
] 8
00-
.....c .....t
- Q
~ 9
1;) 0
~u
.. .c
2.....
ooU
~ ~
'ra g
Q)o
:I:: N~
QQON
:.::::aQ)
..g 0.. ~
p...<Cp...
$-<
~
>>"0
~~
8 Q)
00
"0 2
~ 0..
Q) Q)
..... .0
t 0
~~
l!~
_...d
..... .....
Q"O
92
o Q
U 2
>>:.e
.t:: +---
u-
Q) .
~~
.. .....
~"O
~ ~
C.l~
~ 0
~ 8
"Cl Q)
a.. .....
'" 00
~~
~"O
c:> Q)
$-<
a ~
~ 00 .
-$00
!7.l oo.S
00 d ~
"Cl...d~
~oo""""
a.......
~ p.'~
8:0
8 6-
g.s
o
-;~
= Q) ~
~ ;> 0
a .~ 'u.l
~ d 00
- j:;i ::s
Q) Q
e ~.~
l-Id"O
s
Q)
.....
00
>>
00
"0
2
Q)
00
~
1;)
.s
g-
oo
~
.~
00
~
.....
"O~N
~&~
]1~
~ 0 $-<
1;).s~
Q) Q) 00
~ ~ ~
dO.9
Q) "0 "0
..cQ)Q)
"O~o
'3.0"0
~ ~ ~
2Q)~
Q) .0 +:l
o:S"OQ)
~ '3 ~
..... 0.....
2~"O
Q)ooO
i"O...d
~"O
8~'3
2 Q) 0
~o:S ~
oo.....~
d~"O
.S 00 ~
Q)~"""
g'a ~
2 ~ ~ t
tSoo~~
e <( ~ ~
0.. . 0 ~
d ~tt=< Cl:l
o 00 Q)
"0 ..... s:l. >>
Q) "0 0
~ Q)..... ~o
Q) - "0
$-< Q) Q)
o.....d - "0
><:QQ)-
Q) d ~ ~
~Q)1;)""""
...d.S gj. ~
~].s"O
~~~g
o ..... ~ ~
U ~ d-.::t
Q)Q)I:i"O
~ ~~ a
00
Q)
-
0..
.....
g
'R
~
"0
Q)
P.i:l
';g
~
.....
]
-
.~
o
U
.
~"O
........$
.Q
oo~
@ d
2 Q)
$-<.0
..... .....
.sa
2~
..2 8
S's:l
o as
Q 00
.s~
"'Cl
~"O
o ~
~o
.q
]0
~oo
o $-<
$-< Q)
Q)..g
:t:: I:i
d Q)
8 8
-
d.....
~ ~
...sOd
00 U 0
::s ~ .....
80"0
0000..2
~ @ Q)
..cQ)-.::t
8.....0
Q)Q)O
.Eo:S~
. .-I .... C1)
Q$-<..c
~ Q) 8
::s ~ Q)
08;>
Q 0
1::tiSZ
~.~ .s
~~~
Q 0.. 1::
.Ed::S
.
.
~
00
~
'ra
~
Q
.....
:g
0..
Q)
o:S
~
~
o
.~
~
"0
.....
00
~
o
Q
$-<
~
"0
Q)
1::
Q)
00
2
0..
sg
o
'&
o
I
Q)
~
>>
-
-
d
~
I
~
~
o:i
o
o
N
]
N
o
o
N
~
.....
Q)
00
~
-
I
~
~
~
o
Q)
t
00
.s
Q)
.5
1::
o
Q-.::t
"00
-0
::SN
~ ......~
~~
NO$-<-.::t
0Q)Q)0
o oo..g 0
N~I:iN
~ f-t Q) s:l
..... g.....
00]000
@-Q)@
Q) Q).!:l Q)
..... ~ 0.......
~ ~ ~
Q) .... Q)
>>~oo>>
~0E!~
~oo$~
$-< ~.!:l $-<
~..cQ)~
~8~-.::t
Q)-
"0 8'-l:l "0
~ ~ s ~
- ~ ooN
::s...... rJ)
~ 0 00 "0
~ujg ~
~: ~
sg
o
.....
.....
Q
Q)
-
Q)
1
~
.....
I
Q)
00
l!
~
"0
Q)
m
*
r--..
-
"0
Q)
-
~
*
.
d
o
.....
"0
Q)
-
Q)
-.::t
o
o
N
.s
~
00
1
>>
.0
sg
o
.-
.....
.-
00
o
0..
-.::t-.::t\O
000
000
NNN
.S .S .S
00 00 00
E! E! E!
Q) Q) Q)
~..........
~ ~ ~
Q) Q) Q)
>>>>>>
I I I
o ~ ~
~~~
.s.s.s
~-.::t~
"0"0"0
~ a a
-
.~
o
Q
~
~
-
-
d
00
~
'i3
Q)
-
Q)
>>
.0
~
.-
00
Q)
co
......N-
00 00 00
]]]
~~~
..... ..... .....
Q Q Q
(\.) (\.) (\.)
--"I ,....... .....-.4
~~~
* * *
r--..
N
~
o
.....
"0
Q)
-
Q)
~
o
5
ti
~
Q)
~
-
I
~
1::
~
Q
.s
]
Q)
00
~
...d
Q
o
Z
00
~
o
.-
.....
Q
(\.)
-
Q)
-.::t
o
o
N
$-<
o
N
o
o
N
.s
.....
Q
~
d
"0
'3b
o Q)
~ '-a
~P.i:l
~~
~ ~
0.....
.- ~
"0 0
d '-l:l
a g
$-<
~~
f-t0
* *
r--..
~
-
.~
o
U
>>"t:i
.....-
u~
.s~
1i~
Q) Q
00 ~
"E .9
Cl:l"O
~..2
~ ~
8.s
..... 0
~ ~
0.._
d'-l:l
~ S
001::
Q) Q)
~~
..... ~
"0 .....
~ a
Q ~
a ~
Q) Q)
..c.1!:
2d
.s ;
"0.....
_ 00
::s ~
o 0
...d . u.l
00.....
~ ;>
S :::
..... 0..
~c
@ 0
oa
:Ss
~ 00
o ~
~..Q
iio
8~
d'3
00 0
<C ~
-
'S:::
Co.
<
c:>
-
-
..
=
c:>
:c:
u
<
~
:I
=
..
....
=
c:>
C.l
a..
c:>
bi
=
'S:::
'"
~
-=
C.l
..
-
"Q
:I
Co.
~
-=
-
~
!7.l
c:>
-
u
c:>
....
a..
~
-!
~
.::l
~
~
=
.!
~
-
~
"Cl
"Cl
-
:I
c:>
-=
!7.l
-
..
u
=
:I
c:>
U
~N
.. c::>
Uc::>
~N
.::l ...
E-d::~
-
..
C.l
=
:I
c:>
U
..
U
c:>
...."Cl
Cf.l =
8 '"
= ....
'" ~
.S! 'S:::
"Cl '"
a.."Cl
c:> =
~ :I
- c:>
"'"Q
E"Cl
~ a..
- '"
"; ~
~ ~
C:>.::l
=-
c:> -
.. .-..l
--
f a..
"'~
e-"Cl
a.. ~
Cl."Cl
CJ)~
= ~
.. =
'E .~
'" =
CJ)c:>
~ ..
a.. "t r.rJ
tl ~ a
<<I.: a..
t;"Cl.a
c:> .~ "Cl
.... -= ~
= ..... a..
.S ~ ~
.... - CJ)
u'i <<I
e C.l -
.. -= !7.l
"Cl .. -
~ U =
:s ~ e
i> 00 ~
c:> .-
a.. a Co.
Cl.~a
"Cl - ..
:; ~s
c:> !7.l ~
.::l"Cl-
!7.l a.. :I
:=<<I"Cl
C.l ~ ~
= ~ .::l
:I.::l ~
c:> ..... ~
U-.::l
~ C.l _
.::l~-
E-c~~
,:..>
CHAPTER 257':"-H.F.No. 2535
An act relating to local govenmlent; allowing the city of Shorewood to providefol' election
of cOllncil members from wards.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAY ESTABLISH WARDS.
The city council of the city of Shorewood may provide by ordinance for the
election of city council members by wards. The ordinance may also provide for
staggering of terms. Minnesota election law. including MinneSOtii Statutes, sections
204B.l35 and 205.84, relating ~ wards, applies ~ this section.
Sec. 2. LOCAL APPROVAL.
Section 1 is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Shorewood
complies with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdiviSIOn! --
Presented to the governor March 9, 2000
Signed by the governor March 13. 2000, 2:05 p.m.
.
CHAPTER 258-S.F.No. 2554
An act relating to taxation; providing a one-time exemption from penalty for omission of the
public advertisement requirement of the truth-in-taxation process for Wadena cOllnty.
.
BE IT. ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. WADENA COUNTY; LEVY AUTHORIZATION.
For taxes levied in 1999 only, payable in 2000 only. the requirement under
Minnesota Statutes, section 275.065. subdivisi~ 7. that the county auditor must use
the previous year's levy because of failure to comply with the requirements of
Minnesota Statutes, section 275.065, subdivision. Sa, does not apply to the levy of
Wadenacounty. - --------
Sec. 2. LOCAL APPROVAL; EFFECTIVE DATE.
Section! !! effective upon approval by the Wadena county board and compliance
with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision!
Presented to the governor March 9, 2000
Signed by the governor March 13,2000.2:05 p.m.
New language Is Indicated by underline, deletions by ~
.
"
Options for Implementing Staggered System of Ward Elections
Option 1. In 2002, Ward elections held for Wards 1 and 3, 4-year terms
Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Results in
2002 4yr 4yr Zerby not
-- -- eligible to run
2004 -- 4yr -- 4yr for Ward 2
Councilmember
2006 4 yr -- 4yr -- seat in 2002
2008 -- 4yr -- 4yr
.
Option 2. In 2002, Elections remain at-large with 2-year terms.
In 2004, Ward elections held for aU 4 wards with staggered terms
Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Elections
2002 Elections remain at-large in 2002 - 2 yr terms remain at-large
in 2002 with 2-
2004 2 yr 4yr 2 yr 4yr yr terms. Ward
2006 4yr 4yr elections begin
-- -- in 2004 with
2008 -- 4yr -- 4yr staggered terms.
.
.
.
~
M1nnewasltta Clwrclt
W1P1 - Ward 1, Precinct 1
W1P2 - Ward 1, Precinct 2
W2P1 . Ward 2, Precinct 1
W3P1 - Ward 3, Precinct 1
W4P1 . Ward .I, Precinct 1
City of
Shorewood
Ward Plan within
10% Population
District
Population
0.000
1877.000
1879.000
1967.000
1677.000
Deviation
-1,850
27
29
117
-173
% Deviation
-100%
1.46%
1.57%
6.32%
-9.35%
. Current Council Members
SHRW1
SHRW2
SHRW3
SHRW4
@ Current Polling Sites
* Potential Polling Sites-Ward 3
Map 8.1
-
Minnesota Statute on Council Vacancies
412.02 City elections; officers, terms, vacancies.
Subd. 2a. Vacancy. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 2b, a vacancy in an office shall
be filled by council appointment until an election is held as provided in this subdivision. In case
of a tie vote in the council, the mayor shall make the appointment. If the vacancy occurs before
the first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the next regular city election and more than two
years remain in the unexpired term, a special election shall be held at or before the next regular
city election and the appointed person shall serve until the qualification of a successor elected at
a special election to fill the unexpired portion of the term. If the vacancy occurs on or after the
first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the regular city election or when less than two years
remain in the unexpired term, there need not be a special election to fill the vacancy and the
appointed person shall serve until the qualification of a successor. The council must specify by
ordinance under what circumstances it will hold a special election to fill a vacancy other than a
special election held at the same time as the regular city election.
.
Subd. 2b. Inability or refusal to serve. A vacancy in the office of mayor or council member
may be declared by the council when the officeholder is unable to serve in the office or attend
council meetings for a 90-day period because of illness, or because of absence from or refusal to
attend council meetings for a 90-day period. If any of the preceding conditions occurs, the
council may, after it has by resolution declared a vacancy to exist, fill the vacancy at a regular or
special council meeting for the remainder of the unexpired term, or until the person is again able
to resume duties and attend council meetings, whichever is earlier. When the person is again able
to resume duties and attend council meetings, the council shall by resolution remove the
temporary officeholder and restore the original officeholder.
.
.
,'.
.
.
DRAFT-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 106 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY
CODE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
Section 1. Section 106.01 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following:
106.01: BIENNIAL ELECTIONS: Pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 2000,
Chapter 257, the City of Shorewood shall provide for election of city council members by
wards and may provide for staggering of terms. Minnesota Statutes sections 204B.135
and 205.84, relating to wards, applies to this section. The ward boundaries and staggering
of terms shall be as follows:
Subd. 1
WARD BOUNDARIES
WARD 1
All of the City lying west of Cathcart Drive, north of Smithtown Road and west of
Eureka Road, described as follows:
Commencing at the point of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka that intersects with
the southerly boundary of the City, easterly to the intersection of Cathcart Drive
and West 62nd Street, northerly along Cathcart Drive to its intersection with
Smithtown Road, easterly along Smithtown Road to its intersection with Eureka
Road, northerly along Eureka Road to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, westerly
along said shoreline to the point of beginning; and Goose Island, Spray Island,
Shady Island and that part of Enchanted Island that lies within the City limits.
WARD 2
All of the City lying east of Cathcart Drive, south of Smithtown Road, east of
Eureka Road and north of Yellowstone Trail to the northerly City limits,
described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of Cathcart Drive and West 62nd Street, easterly
along the southerly border of the City limits to its intersection with State Highway
7, easterly along State Highway 7 to its intersection with Yellowstone Trail,
easterly along Yellowstone Trail to the ShorewoodJExcelsior City border,
northerly along the ShorewoodJExcelsior City border to the shoreline of Lake
Minnetonka, westerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the
ShorewoodITonka Bay City border, westerly along the ShorewoodITonka Bay
City border to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, westerly along the shoreline of
Lake Minnetonka to its intersection with Eureka Road, southerly along Eureka
Road to its intersection with Smithtown Road, westerly along Smithtown Road to
its intersection with Cathcart Drive, southerly along Cathcart Drive to the point of
beginning; and including Duck Island, Frog Island, and Gale Island.
1i.
SAMPLE ORDINANCE
Page 2
WARD 3
All of the City lying east of the of the southerly border of the City limits and its
intersection with State Highway 7, south of Yellowstone Trail, south of Radisson
Road, and south of Covington Road, described as follows:
Commencing at the southerly border of the City limits from its intersection with
State Highway 7, easterly along the southerly border of the City limits to the
southeast comer of the City limits, northerly along Vine Hill Road to its
intersection with Covington Road, westerly along Covington Road to its
intersection with Radisson Road, westerly along Radisson Road to the
ShorewoodlExcelsior City border, westerly along the ShorewoodlExcelsior City
border to its intersection with Yellowstone Trail, westerly along Yellowstone
Trail to its intersection with State Highway 7, westerly along State Highway 7 to
the point of beginning.
.
WARD 4
All of the City lying north of Radisson Road and north of Covington Road.
Subd.2
AWARD MAP IS ATTACHED AS EXIDBIT A.
Subd. 3
STAGGERING OF TERMS
Effective with the 2002 Municipal Election, the following shall be the schedule
for the staggering of terms to incorporate ward elections:
(NOTE: Only one option will be listed)
Option 1:
2004 Election
2006 Election
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for four-year terms
Current council members will continue to serve on an at-
large basis to complete the remaining two-years of their
four-year terms expiring December 31,2004.
Elect Wards 2 and 4 for four-year terms
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for four-year terms
.
2002 Election
or Option 2:
2002 Election
2004 Election
2006 Election
Elections remain at-large in 2002, with two-year terms
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for two-year terms
Elect Wards 2 and 4 for four-year terms
Elect Wards 1 and 3 for four-year terms
Section 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and become effective on
September 10, 2002 and for the conduct of the September 10, 2002 election.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
day of April 2002.
t>'.
.
11
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us .
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
4 March 2002
RE:
Ward Boundaries Relative to Planning Districts
FILE NO.
405 (Admin)
I
.
The attached map illustrates the relationship between our current Planning District
boundaries(12) and the proposed Ward boundaries (4). Given that the Planning
District boundaries are geographically based and the Ward boundaries are required to
balance population for voting purposes, the two maps relate remarkably well. If
anything it may require the representatives from Wards II and III to work together as
issues arise in Planning Districts 5 and 7.
Staff agrees that what discrepancies do exist can not be avoided and will not
adversely affect either .planning or political issues (which we always keep separate).
I will not be in attendance Monday night. If you have any questions relative to this
matter you may call me at home 763.566-8355 on Friday or Saturday, or you can try
my cell phone 612.865.3582 on Sunday and Monday.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Jean Panchyshyn
n
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#5
/
~
4
8 (Ward 3)
10
City of Shorewood
Planning Districts in Relation to Ward Boundaries
Planning Districts numbered 1.12
414102
PP-Wlll1l
.
.
i~
..
.: ;uji. lOCi
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 16, 2002
.
RE:
Mayor and City Council Members
Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk ~r
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator C,..(:)
ESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES
TO:
FROM:
Whether Council determines to establish ward boundaries or not, precinct boundaries must be established by
April 30. Polling locations within the precincts need to be determined by June 11.
.
Given that the population of the City has grown 25% from 1990 to 2000 (an increase of 1,483 people) it is highly
advisable to redefine the precinct boundaries to allow for elections to be administered more effectively. Precincts
are not tied to population size. Precincts may not be divided by an elective district boundary. The County and the
State recommend that precincts be kept under 2000 registered voters. In redefining the precinct boundaries,
Council would increase the number of precincts from four to five. The 2002 election budget is. based on a five-
precinct system. As proposed below, with the exception of the Islands, the population per precinct would be
about the same for four precincts in 2002 as it was for three precincts in 1992.
. Precinct Plan - Should Council determine not to establish wards at this time, staff is recommending the
attached resolution and precinct boundary map (Precinct Plan) be approved. This precinct boundary map
labels the precincts 1-5 from left to right. This precinct boundary map follows the ward boundaries that
Council previously indicated it pr~ferred.
. Ward and Precinct Plan - Should Council determine to establish wards at this time, staff is
recommending the attached ordinance, resolution, and ward and precinct boundary map (Ward and
Precinct Plan-Exhibit A) be approved. This map labels the wards and precincts from left to right, as
follows. This ward and precinct boundary map is the same plan that Council previously indicated it
preferred.
Ward 1, Precinct 1 -WIPl
Ward 1, Precinct 2 - WIP2
Ward 2, Precinct 1 - W2Pl
Ward 3, Precinct 1 - W3Pl
Ward 4, Precinct 1 - W4Pl
Citv Council Action
The City Council may decide to approve the ward ordinance and/or precinct resolution and appropriate
boundary map,
or
The City Council may decide to continue this item to a date no later than April 30, 2002.
ft
\..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-#:58
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 02 .
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES
WITHIN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
WHEREAS, with the 2002 Redistricting, the boundaries of Legislative Districts 43A and
43B have changed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood now lies completely within Legislative District 33B; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood population has increased from 5917 in 1990 to 7400 in
2000, an increase of 25.1 %; and
. WHEREAS, this increase in population has deemed it necessary for the City to add another
precinct to create more effectively administered polling sites for its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood
hereby supports the reorganization of the precinct boundaries as set in the Precinct Boundary
Description and Boundary Map attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said change shall take effect on September 10, 2002.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 22nd day of April,
2002.
.
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
PRECINCT BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
Precinct 1
Precinct 1 consists of those islands in the westerly part of the City, to include Goose Island, Spray
Island, Shady Island, and that part of Enchanted Island that lies within the City Limits.
Precinct 2
Precinct 2 consists of all of the City lying west of Cathcart Drive, north of Smithtown Road and west
of Eureka Road to the westerly shoreline of Lake Minnetonka .
Precinct 3
Precinct 3 consists of all of the City lying east of Cathcart Drive, south of Smithtown Road, east of
Eureka Road and north of Yellowstone Trail to the northerly city limits, including Duck Island, Frog
Island and Gale Island.
Precinct 4
Precinct 4 consists of all of the City lying east of the southerly border of the City limits and its
intersection with State Highway 7, south of Yellowstone Trail, south of Radisson Road, and south of
Covington Road.
Precinct 5
Precinct 5 consists of all of the City lying north of Radisson Road and north of Covington Road.
.
.
~
Mlnnewashta Chun:h
* Potential Polling Sites- Precinct 4
City of
Shorewood
@l Current Polling Sites
Precinct Plan
effective September 10, 2002
_s..
31&102
.
.
~ ~'-'
!
N
M_ashla Church
W1P1 - Ward 1, Precinct 1
W1P2. Ward 1, Precinct 2
W2P1 - Ward 2, Precinct 1
W3P1 - Ward 3, Precinct 1
W4P1 - Ward 4, Precinct 1
District Population Deviation % Deviation
0.000 -1,850 -100% . Current Council Members
SHRW1 1877.000 27 1.46%
SHRW2 1879.000 29 1.57% @ Current PoRing Sites
SHRW3 1967.000 117 6.32%
SHRW4 1677.000 -173 -9.35% * Potential Polling Sites- Ward 3
City of
Shorewood
Ward and
Precinct Plan
effective September 10, 2002
EXHIBIT A
=\i
6'
:)::::,
a 3"'0 r-
oomm
3m(/)S
3 men
ur~an
!!!. 2" m: m
gii3g~
- -
-30...
::r(1)(1)-f
m _ !!!. ::r
-0 5" <g (1)
~o.(1),
~oo.s:
a;'6"a
o ::r ::r_0
3Q~=r
;2. ~.~. 0
(/)::J _.0
!!!. (1) ~ 2.
o 3"'0 c::
::J ~ -::J
::J~o
~~5g
0. <0 -'::J
o-mt5:E
.... 3 0.-'
S-~(1)S-
(1) :-"'0 "
Q~~~
'< m::J
afJ::Ja
g ::J In g
:::J ::r 0- (/)
Q. ~ c:: s.
=(1) (is:
~S-~~
om(/)::r
c:: (/) ~ ~
~m::J(/)
~(/)o.o
,.. m ....
-- ::J ::r m
::J-o~
m--3 -
....omm
m.... 0.
!eo"Q~~
mm::J<
p-m~a:
:::J (/) m
-(/)o
mm_
S(1)~
__"'0
o::rm
_(1)~
::r<::J
m~o.
-oc:~
~m-o
::J~o
:!.::J :E
::J 0. m
<0 0- ....
m-o
~o
~ S'
'< -
o
-
~
~
-f OJ 0-00
~5:52.
(/) <0 '< m
mm!J'''''
=",
tg._-f
(j)o-~::t
:E S. S- en
_. ::r .... 0
=(1)(1)~
o-::J(1)m
~. g."2. c::
:::Jooo
!eo--en
~::r~"
rom(1)-f
o.z~::r
(/) (1)
g~~,
....(1)s:
S- ~ ..
mCii......a
0- -0
c:: a 0- -.
o ::r 0 (/)
'<~--
(/)::J::rc::
0-::J(1)5..
Qt.?' 5.. S'
O~(/)<O
m::Jo~
-+ a. ;: "0
::r(,)::r=
m-(1)O
o-s-)>~
5(1)0....
'< (/) 0..2.
(/)g~~
~-OJ=
(1) ::r :::!. 0
0. !!!. 0. -.
.... 0. <0 ::J
Omm(/)
"'Oo~i>>
"'0 _ ::J =
(1) en 0. (/)
0. 0
_."'0 S- -
aii3(1)~
o '< __ _
"'0 - 3 to'
~!!!..3;r
o~m(/)
(1) 0. 9: 0
S'c' ~:::J
S:!eo(1)2
~m~;:l.
-:==:~m~
!eo ~ S'
o m m
-~o.
:r:!eo
oo~
:E - ::J
~_o.
a ~<g
(/)- )> ~
-oO:::J
Q.O 0
::J~::r
:- ~
::J
~
!-11
0.30.m
o c:: c:: 0
~ a:; 5' =-
S' '"Q.. <0 Q.
<0 (1) _ CD
"'0 o.::r .."
-o(1)m
~ ~~5:
_-0
~ 0....... CD
'<~o-."
(/)Om
3(1)~""
c:: ..:....- S' 3
!eo -f <0 ..
<0 ::r (/) )>
om(1)<
- '< ~ o'
::r::r(/)
a~Q~
c:: < -- -.
<om-:::;:g
::r 0-...... 0
-(1)0--
::r(1)0_
m::J~::r
~ ::J _ (1)
"'00 (/)3
"'0 :::!: :E
a ::!': m S.
< ~ .... -'
~ ...... m '"Q..
--o-m
"'0 ::r m
a ~ S' g-
o ::r<O 0
m ur !eo :::
(/) -. 0 o'
-0 (/) ~ (1)
::J ,.. ::J
....00'(/)
~-om
g.~ ;:. ~
~"'O ::r OJ
::Jamo
~"Q3S.
0. iU' ~. g-
om::J....
0- 'OJ
a~~....
to- ~ @ a:
c::...... <0
ii3 s- S' (1)
:::!:~!eo"
o-m~
? ~~3
::r0:E
~ :::: ~
:E ::r (/)
_.m 0
(/)......0-
;:om
o~<
g.o~
~~3
<oo.~
(1) o-::J
-'<'<
::r__
~'~3'
""'m
.
~
~
-- 0.... s'en2'<
5~0(1)_::r~::::
o.o;a-@::rm 0.::::'
m c:: :::!.(1) (1) :::!'S'CD
0. .... 0- (/) - ::::::<0 .."
0- m ~ :::!: (1) (/)- "'tJ
'< ::J -. ::J ~ 0."Q m_
_o<O....mo....
t- 0- =. S- (/) -g s. 0
::Jc:::::J~m....~c-
::J 0. I\:) - ~ - ,..
(1)<Oo--30.CD
"'0 ~0~6"~ o-c
s'o.~(/) 3 -'<-
a (1) c:: m ~ ~ CD'
o ff:E-a 3 ::J ....... en
C=(1) c:o-o.o"
;a(/)<= (/)(1)---f
'< ~ s. _ .... ::r S- :E
..:....--=co(1)(1)O
- 0 ::J -. ,
::roo.:::!:s:......~
~;a (/) m a~3 8:
- S' a 0 0 m a:
~c::3::J-30
(1) (1) "".. (1) ::J
- __:::..m o-~
-0::r~-(1)-
",o<=mo::r....O'
....<: ::r.."om
(1) 0 I\:) =:;. ="'0
0. .... 0 ...... -- c::
-- '" 0 - S- (1) -
U :E ...... I\:) m (/) co'
- ="'0 0 ~ (/)
::r::r....o~::J:E
~ _..2. I\:) 0. 0. m
_ ::r m ..:....- -. (/) ....
::r (1) 0 :::!: 0 (1)
~en;::;tg3~
(1) ::r (1) -. ~ CD 0.
:E~o(/)a:(/)g-
==~"Qm-5o.
0- (/)- :::!...2."'O"'O -
mmc::-o
mo.o.o:::!:CD-
(/)(1) -CD3::r
O"'OOO(/)CDm
~~C63~3;a:E
'..3.... ~~~
o -(1)0.--
::r m 0 -. (1) - (1)
~ ::J ....::J c::...,
mc;~:E:5..~
::J::Jo~o(/)-
<0 _I\:)-=o.a
(1)C- co.o-
(/) 5.. ~ 5.. ~ ::J (/)-
<0 -. 0. m ::J ~ (/)
m:::J ...,o.ms-
a: ~ m 0-"'0 0. =a::
t5Q-@a.~~~
::r I\:) m ~ a: 0 !eo
-. 0 - ~ C6 0 (/)
(/)om- ~c::
"'0 (,)o.~ 0.-3
a~~5..::i:g3
<Q 5.. m - ~ !!!. CD
~ 0. ::r (1) ::J _...,
3gcm::JCD-
O,o(/)::r
6" C5 (1) s: (1) (/) ~
::Jo. -(1)::J
o-o.<a~!J''''
m. 00 (/)
...... -- c: -. 0. OJ 0
0:E::J(/)~s.
0=- ~::r
~::r~ =-
o -< m::r
0.(1)
.
::r ::r ' :::!. 0 :0 s: 0 s:
~ (1) s: <0 0 0 -' 0 0
C6(/)a;r~~::J::J-
m 0 (/) -. 0. ffi !!!. 0
~~ urg-......-g-~.
-,;...."p) ....,,-Lo.......CD
(1) m 0. ~ -. 0:::J -.
~ ~ 0 (j) t5 _. @ t5 Q.
-. "So _::J. :E
C (1) ::rc..... ~m
:::!:-fo.g(1)(1)-f::J_
g ::r ~ -'"'0 ::J ::r 0 CD
...... m 3 t5 0 :!. m a ri
'-" OJ (/) ::J (1) -. .."
~ ~ Q 8 !!!. <0_ ~ ~ ~
....t:;~::Jg:(/)m::J
(1)o.o(/)CDOJ~om
_ -. ..., a: c:: ~ (/) (1) 3
::r (/) c' m (/) '< ~ CD
m'"Q..3 m (1)~ ~3 ~
3~__0.0::J<(1)-
o::Jc' -o.CD::J3
.... :!. ::J _ mo-O. CD
~::J:::!:::Jrobm3~
O<OmoO:::JCDm~
:::!. - I ....0. q <0 ::J ::J
c:: 0...... o' -. - ::J
3 s. Cf ~ q {; g- S- 0
(1) !!!. ~ 6" Q. ~ ;a ~ a
::J - ...... - ,.. -. <= m
0. - 0"'0 S' a ::!': <: ...,
!J'~~m<O""~o-
(/)0<3m..S.O
m ::J CD m en 0."'0
~ _ ;a s.?' x'"'O m
...,::r_oz .....(/)
(1)mc::(j3 s:om
~ ..... 0 _. ::r .,
(/)mS-~;:l.(1)5'<;
o.!eom(/)::r =m
c::~""~oa_::r
:::!. g: 0. ::J - m ::r
:::J -. 0 - (1) (1) m
<0 ~o.g ~",c:::::J
= 3 ;:s: :::!:.... S' ~ ~
(/) ...... ::J 0 ~ ,.. c::
~"'<O::J=:r:o"'"
::J;ao.' a~-~
::JomG)~(j)3(/)
c-<...,o.-oS-
~::Jm~_(1)-_
-mo::J.....o.om
(; :E "'0 0. m (/)- ~. 0
"'0.3"'0 =OJm-
mom~(1)~O'm
6" ~ ;a ~ S' ~ :E 3
c:: _(/) :E :::!: -f -0 ~ ~.
-..... ::r ::J ~ ~ (1) ::J
(/) 3 -.<0 ::J -. .... -.
ooro(1)~aQ::J
::rO(/)X<OCD~<O
(1) ..., - -. (1) '- - :E
0. S' c:: ~ .... (/) - m
c:: <0 ~ S' , a g =
m (/) -. <0 ~..... ~
o.o:::J::r",mo:::J
_.....<00(1) (1) m 0.
0--3' "';:l.~
.... ~:r. -f:E~. .....
S:::J(/)m::r(1)::Jm
~ 0 -. 0 (1) (/)"'0 ~
'< ::r ~:E - ~ -(/)
- -. c:: ::J OJ 0 .... _
::J (1)0--::r
~<O ~'-~ a(/) (1)
0.ii3 c:: (/) 0.0 9.,
:E 3 ;:l. g (ii' 5 ' s:
~"'O ~~ -<~n
_ (/) _..., -. m 0
(/) s- - t5 --
_::r (/)
o (1)
~
......
o.(/)~mNN
arVi5..C6~~
0"'0 ......;a......"
~~i\5f5~m
:Eo.~-c::S:
-. (1) 25" '< (/) c::
::r 0. I\:) <0 (/) en
s: ::r:', ~ (1) tg
m- (/)-
Z ._ ::J 0- 0 en
c:: 0. ..
~ .2" ~ ::r ~ -f
:om~(1)9.~
~~5..~{;~
~@~_(1) @a
. ::rO~"""O
-fom::J~~
::r0.~0.::J::J
(ii' m :::J _ :::J 0.
:E....O'~~-
o 3 ~ -. g ~
~~::r3""
-. ~ c::"'O f>> ~
(/) -. (/) ~ '"
c t5 iU' U ~ m
::J (/) (/) :E '< s:
g- ~ 3 = 0 S'
~ 5.. ~ g~' ffi
~ 9: m ::r o' 6"
. m c::J::J
o 0.<0 -. '"
- (ii' m (/) ~
(1)~..:....-_)>
0. "'0 ::r (/)
(1)"'0 -f ~ (/)
i>> Q. ;r N g
::::::::J m m -.
_:::!:(1)0-~
0::J ii3:::!:
::J CP!eo g
CD ~3
cg 5"@Vir
:::!:"5"(I)S:
~(1)_m)>
mo-o.(j)-
..., (1) - ~
~f5""=""
"'0." 3 '" m
m:" (1) (1) :E
<_(1)00
m::r:::!:c::~
;a (1) t5 0 S'
o' , (/) ::r <0
::J~:E~0
"'0 0 ~ 3 ::J
~ (1)0.~
::J ~ ::r (ii'"'O
o5..~ma
..., ,0. ~ roo
{;s:o-mU
@)>~~g-
s: g' mo.!!!.
-. ~ m 3 <0
:::J....::J -.::J
::J O'......=m
~ (/) 0 Q. 0.
o C;3':- -
:::J o:Eo
@ 25"=@
...... m
"'0
oen,,-f
~c::.....o
-0-0..
~ ~. 3 a
(1) .. _.
)>0 ~
"'OIT-f
.......-00
=' 3-
......s:enen
O1a",::r
S-o.....o
- z ~ m
1\:)(1)3:E
o:E!eoo
o(/)~o
1\:)-0.0.
(1) -
-
-,
~s:
a
o
:0
CD
"'0
....
m
(I)
m
::J
-
~
-
<'
(1)
7. Buoy System chanaes: Beginning in 2003, Hennepin County will be implementing the new "unified navigational
system" established by the U.S. Coast Guard. Under this system, point buoys will be black (instead of white with a
red vertical stripe.) The plan is to paint the existing buoys.
8. Annual Charter Boat Meetinas: Annual meetings with charter boat owners who have liquor licenses have been
conducted. These meetings focus on LMCD charter boat rules and regulations, and no new or renewal liquor
licenses are granted to charter boats that do not send a representative to one of these meetings. The Water Patrol,
the MN Department of Public Safety, and the Hennepin County Health Department also participated.
9. Surveys: Historically the LMCD has conducted a Boat Density Study every two years and a Boater Attitude Survey
every four years. The Board has decided to decrease the frequency of the Boat Density Study to every four years,
and to have both studies done the same year, starting in 2004. This means that the 2002 survey will not be
conducted, which was budgeted at $17,000. Also, the annual shoreline inventory will be conducted this summer,
which tells us the numbers and types of docks and boats on the Lake.
10. 2003 Budaet: The 2003 LMCD Budget process is beginning; the member cities should see a draft of the budget in .
late May.
11. Annual Financial Audit: This audit of the financial records for 2001 is underway. The final report will be sent to the
member cities, as required by law, in May.
12. Web Paae: The LMCD's Web site is http://www.lmcd.org
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 2002
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1.
CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
DRAfT
Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:04 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Chair Arnst; Commissioners Young, Callies, Meyer, and Palesch; Engineer Brown;
Planning Director Nielsen; City Council Liaison Lizee
Absent:
Commissioner Bartlett
B.
Review Agenda
Palesch moved, Meyer seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Minutes of March 12, 2002
Palesch moved, Callies seconded, approving the Park Commission Meeting Minutes of March 12,
2002 as submitted. Motion passed 5/0.
B. Park Commission Informational Meeting With Sports Organizations Minutes of
March 20, 2002
Callies moved, Palesch seconded, approving the Park Commission Informational Meeting Minutes
of March 20, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 5/0.
C. Park Commission Work Session Minutes of March 26, 2002
Meyer moved, Young seconded, the Park Commission Work Session Minutes of March 26, 2002, as
submitted. Motion passed 5/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were none.
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meetings of March 25 and AprilS
Liaison Lizee stated that while she had nothing pertinent to share from the March 25,2002, meeting, she did
have several items to report from the April 8, 2002, meeting.
1t71f
REGULAR PARK COMMISSION MEETING
April 9, 2002
Page 2 of5
Prior to the regular City Council Meeting on the 8th, representatives from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek
Watershed District gave a presentation, as did representatives from the Hennepin County Assessors Office.
Lizee reported that a Public Hearing on wards took place during the regular meeting and will be continued
for discussion at the next City Council Meeting in order to gain more public comment.
Lizee continued that the underground of power lines at the County Road 19 intersection was discussed.
Engineer Brown added that the approval process is moving forward as phase one of a landscape concept
design will be worked up by Brauer and Associates, Inc.
B. Review Written Opinion by Planning Director for Dugout at Freeman Field 2
Planning Director Nielsen gave a report on the status of Ball Field hnprovements at Freeman Park, outlining
the work that South Tonka Baseball (STBB) is authorized to perform. A list of nine items were identified as
STBB responsibilities, with an additional list of 4 items that the City will commit to.
With regard to the South Tonka Baseball responsibilities, Nielsen noted that items 1,4,5, and 6 were merely .
maintenance matters. In reference to item 2, Nielsen agreed that the installation of plastic safety tubing along
the top rail of the outfield fences was a good improvement. However, STBB will be required to install an
acceptable color, green or blue.
Nielsen reported that the temporary scorers booth, Item 7, had been removed and STBB will contact the Park
Commission in the future if they wish to begin the process to reinstate any such structure.
Item 9, Nielsen explained with visual aids, addresses the need to extend the steel poles on the third base side
of Field 2 between the backstops and batting cage and installation of netting to contain foul balls. Palesch
and Meyer agreed this would be a needed improvement.
Young moved, Palesch seconded, approving the extension of steel poles on the third base side of Field 2
between the backstop and batting cage with the installation of netting to contain foul balls. Motion
passed 5/0.
C. Report on City Council Action Regarding South Tonka Little League Requests for
Improvements
.
Nielsen informed the Commission that the City Council had held off on item 8, the installation of taller steel
poles along the third base side ofField 2 to support awnings, until a Public Hearing scheduled for May 7,
2002 would take place.
Nielsen shared the history of the dugout issues for Field 2 with the Commission. Presently, he stated that
STBB would like to stretch awnings over the dugouts to protect players from the sun. These awnings would
be of a seasonal or temporary nature, which appealed to the Planning Commission. The awnings would be
put up in the spring and taken down in the fall, unlike the metal roofed ones installed last year. Nielsen
stated that they would be much like a boat canopy, dark green in nature, and unlikely to weather well if left
up year round. Meyer asked ifhe had seen them. Nielsen stated that he had not, but could envision them. He
added that the Commission had originally approved the concept of the awnings but he asked for their
feedback nonetheless this evening.
....------REGUJ::;AR PARK-€0MMISSIONMEE'fING.. .
April 9, 2002
Page 3 of5
. _ _..______,.,______._.,.__".____.__.__."...___.__...H___._,._....~..".___,___,______'___." .".
Meyer inquired whether such structures had been denied previously. Brown indicated that a permanent
structure with a metal roof and back were denied, whereas this structure would be of a temporary nature
without a backside. Chair Arnst was concerned that by approving this temporary structure the City might be
opening the door to problems, temporary or not, the property line issue remains. Brown asked if STBB had
formally applied for this application or if any plans had been submitted at this time to judge. Nielsen stated
that nothing had been submitted, however, the Public Hearing is scheduled and plans will need to be in hand
prior to that date. Brown maintained that he was hesitant to have the Park Commission make a
recommendation without a drawing. Palesch concurred, stating that STBB put up a structure without proper
approval in the past and asked what would stop them from doing so again. Chair Arnst noted that history
dictates caution in this instance and asked to view drawings before making any further recommendations.
Nielsen promised to provide drawings to the Commission at its next meeting on April 23, 2002.
5. IDGHW A Y 7 RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY
.
Nielsen provided background on the Highway 7 right of way property located near the water tower by the old
wayside, north ofSt. Johns Cemetery. Currently, St. Johns Baptist Church is working on completing a
master plan for their cemetery and would like to change their point of entry. Nielsen pointed out that the most
desirable location would be the right of way property owned by MnDOT.
Nielsen stated that if the City could acquire this property from MnDOT, who has no purpose for it, this piece
could potentially be traded for some of the wooded natural land at the southern end ofthe cemetery. Since
the only prerequisite from MnDOT is to provide public service of the parcel, a passive use wetland area
would be ideal. Nielsen pointed out that the Planning Commission liked the idea so much that they
recommended a comp plan amendment to favor this trade. The LCEC, whose charge is to acquire land for
conservation, were also fond of the concept.
.
Nielsen stated that Turgeon, of the City Council, believed it was imperative to get input from the Park
Commission, in view that the concept will likely fall under their jurisdiction in the future. Nielsen asked for
the Commission's thoughts. Palesch inquired over the terrain and commented that she liked the idea.
Primarily a wetland, Nielsen added that the church is receptive to adding some passive walking trails. Young
asked what the Church hoped to get from the deal. Nielsen stated that they would not only change their point
of entry, but the grades of the subject property would be much more amenable to the cemetery than the
current woodland area, which would require much site alteration. Young asked how big a parcel they are
referring to. Nielsen pointed out that the property is approximately 2 acres.
Young questioned where the proposal was at currently. Nielsen stated at the May 7,2002 meeting, the City
will be looking at the land use and conservation open space options. When asked whether MnDOT had been
approached about the transfer of ownership, Nielsen replied that they had not been contacted yet but he
expected the entire process to take up to six months or more. Brown inquired over the placement of future
wells at the site. Nielsen stated that the City would retain enough area near the water tower to allow for one
at a later date.
Chair Arnst asked what Nielsen needed from the Park Commission. Nielsen reiterated that he was looking for
their feedback of whether they view this proposal as a reasonable use of land. Callies supported the idea,
however thought the subject property currently acts as a good buffer, and wondered what expansion of the
cemetery at this location would mean to the area. Nielsen pointed out that the unique character of the whole
site would be changed more so if St. John's develops the southern wooded end. While no specific plans were
available for consideration, Chair Arnst urged Nielsen to keep the use to a minimum, suggesting perhaps a
. --REGUbARPARKGOMMISSIONMEE'FING-
Apri19,2002
Page 4 of5
passive wooded trail.
Chair Arnst informed Nielsen that this is the first time she had heard of the possibility of adding open space
to the Park Commission's jurisdiction after the LCEC disbands. She encouraged Nielsen to schedule a joint
meeting between the Commissions and Council to begin a dialogue to discuss the matter.
6. DISCUSS NEXT STEP FOR PARK MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR 2003
Chair Arnst asked the Commission what they believed the next step for the Park Management Process to be.
Brown reminded the Commission that at the last meeting he had presented a memo identifying alternatives to
MCES. As it stands, Brown felt it unlikely that the services would be provided in-house, and believed that
contracting out would maximize staff resources and minimize costs.
Brown pointed out that the City currently knows a number of people who might be interested in providing
services. He felt it best to sit down with those individuals first to determine the responsibilities and costs. .
By identifying the costs, focusing on how the operation will be managed, and how best to market the service,
an RFP can be created. Chair Arnst inquired what the recommended first step would be. Brown stated that a
letter of interest, containing an executive summary proposal to go over with staff, followed by a meeting to
discuss outlines of each one's expectations would be the proper sequence.
As a recommending body, Chair Arnst asked when the process could begin. Brown stated that if it were the
Commission's desire for staff to define the [mal product and accept letters of interest they would be free to
do so at this point. Chair Arnst indicated that a list of 18 issues was provided to staff after the j oint meeting
of December 11, 2002, and would go far in assisting staff as they specify the position.
Young asked what sort of hours an independent person would commit to and why it would be less costly than
hiring some one in-house. Brown explained that it would be easier and less costly to find someone to work
from home, available to work the flexible hours that scheduling will require, at a negotiated fee, and for a
contracted timeframe.
Meyer proposed the Commission direct staff to seek out input and develop the position. There was a
consensus among the commissioners to move this forward before the budget process begins.
.
7. STATUS UPDATE ON FREEMAN PARK PARKING LOT
Brown reported that staff has spent approximately six months working with MCWD regarding the
construction of the Freeman Park parking lot due to the state closure of the highway 7 access. As a trade-off,
the state set a deadline for the City to receive $50,000 to aid them in the closure and construction of the lot.
As that sunset date for the money is fast approaching, staff is hopeful that plans and specs will be finalized
Thursday. A public open house will take place April 29, 2002, from 5:00 - 7:30 P.M. for public comment.
Brown stated that staff is moving quickly to take advantage of these dollars, which will help solve some of
the parking and drainage issues. A contract needs to be in place by July 1,2002.
Young asked if the City was able to accommodate the MCWD. Brown affirmed that they were and stated
that in the future the Commission may be hearing about the possibility of open water ponding along the
walking trails at Freeman.
.
'.
REGULAR PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Apri19,2002
Page 5 of5
8. SET DATE FOR PARK TOURS
Park Tours will take place on June 8, 2002, at 8:30 A.M. beginning at the first park chosen for the day, with
the exception of Freeman Park. The Freeman Park park tour is scheduled for June 11,2002, as part of the
Regular Park Commission meeting.
9. DISCUSS WORK SESSION FOR APRIL 23 MEETING
Brown reported that Mark Koegler would be presenting the master plan review for Freeman Park on April
23,2002. Brown stated that Koegler is familiar with the process and encouraged the commissioners to voice
their opinions freely.
10. DETERMINE PARK LIAISON FOR MAY
. Meyer will cover the May 13th and 28th City Council Meetings. Chair Arnst will attend the April 23rd
meeting.
11. NEW BUSINESS
Lizee invited the Commissioners to join students of Minnewashta School for their first annual Earth Day
Walk-in on April 23, 2002. The public will be meeting at Manitou Park at 7:00 A.M., walking along the
trail to Freeman Park. At 7:30 A.M. they will leave Freeman Park to walk down Strawberry Lane, with
police escort, to the school.
Saturday, April 27, 2002, a planning seminar and Land Use Workshop presented by John Shard10w will
be held at the Southshore Center.
.
Brown reported that the public open house held regarding Smithtown Road was well attended. The
comment period will continue for approximately three weeks, at which time, a joint work session will be
scheduled.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Palesch moved, Callies seconded, adjourning the Regular Park Commission Meeting of April 9,
2002, at 8:42 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Kristi B. Anderson
RECORDING SECRETARY
..
..
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
27 March 2002
RE:
AT&T - Conditional Use Permit for Telecommunications
Facilities at Southeast Area Water Tower Site
FILE NO.:
405(02.07)
BACKGROUND
.
Site Acquisition Consultants, LP, has made application on behalf of AT&T Wireless to
add three additional telecommunications antennae on Shorewood's Soutbeast Area water
tower at 5500 Old Market Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). They
propose to add three antenna panels to their existing array. The property in question is
zoned R-1A, Single-family Residential. The site measures 200' x 200' and contains
40,000 square feet of area.
, As shown on Exhibit B, one of the new antennas would be located on the stem ofthe
water tower, and two more would be located on top ofthe water tower. They presently
have four panels on top and two on the stem. This request necessitates a conditional use
permit and a revision of their current lease agreement. Their request is explained in their
narrative overview of the proposal- Exhibit C, attached.
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
AT&T was the first company to locate telecommunication facilities on Shorewood
property. As such, the original conditional use permit and lease were approved back in
February of 1990. Much has changed since then - most notably the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 and increased pressure to provide space for a rapidly growing
ft
\,1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:/III
Memorandum
Re: AT&T Conditional Use Permit
27 March 2002
telecommunications industry. In response, Shorewood has adopted its local regulations
consistent with Federal requirements. These are found in Section 1201.03 Subd. 21 of
the City Code.
A. Land Use. For the most part, telecommunications facilities have been limited to
commercial zoning districts within the city, although the Code does allow the use of
public property for this purpose by conditional use permit. While the Code states that
there is no obligation on the part of the City to sell or lease public property to
telecommunications carriers, the Planning Commission had at one time recommended
existing tower facilities (i.e. City water towers) be used first before constructing
additional freestanding towers.
.
B. Code Requirements. Much of the current Code is intended to address new,
freestanding tower sites. Several provisions, however, are relevant to location of
facilities on existing towers:
1. Finish. The proposed antennae must be finished to match the color of the existing
water tower.
2. Proposed Ground Facilities. Any new equipment associated with the new
antennae will be located within the existing building. Existing landscaping
screens this building extremely well.
3. Fencin.g. No new fencing is required.
4. Landscaping. See comment 2., above.
.
5. Stealth. As difficult as it can.be to disguise antenna facilities, locating them on
existing towers or water towers is undoubtedly less visually obtrusive than
building new freestanding towers. As evidenced by the facilities located at the
southeast area water tower, the ground facilities can be screened from view quite
effectively. Consequently, the stealthiest thing we need to require is that the
antenna panels be painted the same color as the water tower.
6. Evaluation and Monitoring. Our current code requirements provide for initial and
ongoing monitoring of FCC radiation emission requirements. The City's
telecommunications consultant will address emissions in a separate report. Lease
agreements between telecommunications carriers and the City provide for annual
monitoring and, if necessary, testing.
7. Engineering. The applicant is required to submit structural calculations for
review by the City Engineer.
-2-
Memorandum
Re: AT&T Conditional Use Permit
27 March 2002
The applicant's request provides the City with an opportunity to free up some additional
space on the water tower and to update the lease for the site. As shown on Exhibit B,
AT&T currently occupies two spaces on the Southeast Area water tower. The applicant
has agreed to confine their antennae array to the top of the tower, removing two existing
panels and making room for an additional carrier on the stem ofthe tower. This is
extremely important in light of the limited amount of "vertical real estate" that is
available.
Approval of this conditional use permit should be subject to the following:
Relocation of the two lower antenna panels to the top of the tower.
Approval of the City Engineer with respect to structural and operational issues.
Approval of the City's Telecommunications Consultant.
The applicant must enter into an updated lease agreement with the City, including
provisions for annual monitoring and current lease rates.
Prior to.any construction the City Engineer will require an additional letter of
credit or cash escrow relative to the work being done on public property and to
the toweritself.
If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior
to the 2 April meeting.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Kristi Lokken
.
-3-
'"
,).,
,).,
(
Christmas
Lake
400
I
o
400 Feet
I
~
N
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
AT&T Conditional Use Permit
" PROPOSED ANTENNAS
. ELEV: 164'-0. A.C.L.
\
~ CL OF PROPOSED ANTENNA
ELEV: 98'-0. A.C.L.
FINISHED CRADE
[LEV: O'-O':t
SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
--- · · KDC
-- - . .
... . I
... I I
... I I
Architects - Engineens. P.C.
6100 Green Valley Drive Suile 2'0
Blaaminglan, loiN ~~438
9~2-842-7448 FAX
9~-842-74H Phane
Eman: kdcdenverD1<dcarchitecls.cam
Websile: www.kdcatchilecls.com
PROPOSED AT&T
PANEL ANTENNAS(2)
EXISTING ANTENNAS (4)
EXISTING 160'-0. WATER TANK
PROPOSED AT&T
PANEL ANTENNA
EXISTING ANTENNAS
PROPOSED COAX ROUTE TO
EXISTING ANTENNAS.
SUB-CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW
EXISTING ROUTE WITH
PROPOSED COAX (FIELD VERIFY
ROUTE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION)
(TYP. )
EXISTING
SHELTER (TYP.)
SITE #: MI-42A
SITE NAME: SHOREWOOD
EXISTING'WATER TANK I EXISTIN'" .,.u~. ...~""
SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0"
a AT&T
5500 OLD MARKET RD
SHOREWOOD, MN
Exhibit B
S.E. AREA WATER TOWER
Antenna locations
CITY OF SHOREWOOD AT&T SITE MI-42A
NARRATIVE OVERVIEW
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("AT&T") seeks the approval of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota to reconfigure and update the existing Wireless
Telecommunication Service Facility ("WTSF") located at the Shorewood Water Tank at
5500 Old Market Road, Shorewood, Minnesota.
AT&T, and its affiliates, have acquired licenses from the Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") to provide communication service throughout the
United States. These licenses include the City of Shorewood and the remainder of the
Minneapolis/St.Paul metropolitan region. The regional system is part of an integrated
nationwide network of coverage.
.
The WTSF, which AT&T proposed to improve on the property, is necessary in
order to continue to provide uninterrupted communication services to your community,
including services such as cellular telephone, voice paging and wireless data
transmission. AT&T's updated communication technology operates at various radio
frequency ("RF") bands between 1850-1990 megahertz and utilizes a digital wireless
voice and data transmission system. This technology promises to provide consumers
with enhanced service (including greater sound, clarity and privacy) as well as new
services not currently available under some traditional analog cellular systems.
.
Like traditional cellular phone systems, the AT&T communication system
operates on a "grid" system, whereby overlapping ~'cells" mesh to forma seamless
wireless network. The technical criteria for establishing cell sites are very exacting as to
both the height and location of the WTSF. Within the Shorewood vicinity, based on a
computerized engineering study, which takes into account among other things, local
population density, traffic patterns and topography, AT&T's engineers have identified
the need to update this WTSF in order to function as an integral part ofthe
communication network.
The property originally was selected based on its satisfying RF criteria (including
antenna height) and AT&T's review oflocalland uses and site availability. Specifically,
proximity to Shorewood residential and business communities, major roadways and
shopping centers were relevant siting criteria.
AT &T has requested the City Planning Commission and the City Council to
approve our proposal to update, erect, and maintain the existing WTSF, including
relocating the existing two (2) AT&T antennas located on the water tank stem, to the top
of the water tank, pursuant.to the City's request. The top of the water tank has four (4)
existing AT&T antennas. AT&T would like to, in addition to moving the two (2)
antennas from the stem, add three (3) antennas to the top, for a total of nine (9) antennas
located on the top of the water tank. There will be no additional structures added at
ground level.
Exhibit C
APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE OVERVIEW
The upgraded facility is not staffed, and, upon completion, will require only
infrequent site visits (approximately one time a month). The site is entirely self-
monitored and connects directly to a central office where sophisticated computers alert
personnel to equipment malfunction or breach of security. Moreover, no nuisances will
he generated by the upgraded WTSF. In general, the AT&T communication service does
not interfere with any other forms of communications. To the contrary, the technology
provides vital communication in emergency situations and will be commonly used by
local residents and emergency personnel to protect the general public's health safety and
welfare.
.
The proposed facilities will be designed and constructed to meet applicable
governmental and industry safety standards. Specifically, AT&T will comply with all
FCC and FAA rules regarding construction requirements, technical standards,
interference protection, power and height limitations and radio frequency standards. Any
and all RF emissions are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the FCC.
AT&T is under rigid time constraints, and consistent with applicable law, we
respectfully request this application be processed as expeditiously as possible. Please
note that AT&T expressly reserves all of its rights and claims, including, without
limitation, those available to it under federal law. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, no waiver, admission or agreement shall be inferred herefrom and no filing of
any application for any permit (including without limitation, any building or other
permit), license or approval or any other action heretofore or hereafter taken by or on
behalf of AT&T shall be construed as a waiver or limitation of any right or claim of
AT&T.
.
AT &T looks forward to working with the City of Shorewood to bring the benefits
of AT&T's communication service to the entire community. The upgrading of this site
will ensure uninterrupted superior digital communication service to the City of
Shorewood and greater competition in the marketplace.
.
March 6, 2002
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331-8927
RE: AT&T Application for Cellular Site
Dear Mr. Larry Brown:
. I have reviewed the application from AT&T for a modification to the existing PCS
telecommunications facility proposed to be located on the west water tower.
I performed an interference study (intermodulation) usmg all the present
frequencies on the water tower as well as all city and county frequencies that could be
located on the tower. My analysis does not reveal any predicted interference problems with
the proposal.
.
Based on my review and analysis of the AT&T proposal it satisfies all of the
technical requirements of the city and can be approved.
If you have any questions in this matter please contact me.
Garrett G. Lysiak, P.E.
4
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless Services (Applicant) is a communications common carrier
licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to provide personal communications
services to the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has determined that, in order to provide uninterrupted
personal communications services to the western segment of its territory, it requires the
expansion of an existing antenna array on a site in the westerly one-half of the City of
Shorewood; and
.
WHEREAS, the Applicant has therefore applied for a Conditional Use Permit to install
as many as twelve (12) communications antennae on the Shorewood Southeast Area water tower;
and
WHEREAS, the Applicant currently has six antenna panels, four of which occupy the
top of the water tower and two of which occupy the stem of the water tower and has constructed
a 9-foot by IS-foot communications equipment building on a portion of the property legally
described as:
"The South 200 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 34, Auditor's Subd. No. 141, Hennepin
County, Minnesota."
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations have been duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated
. 27 March 2002, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City's Consulting
Telecommunications Engineer, and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a letter to
the City Engineer, dated 6 March 2002, which letter is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application
reviewed by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on 6 March 2002, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's application was considered by the City Council at its
regular meeting held on 22 April 2002, at which time the City Planner's and the Consulting
Engineer's letter were reviewed, the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed,
comments were heard from City Council members and staff, and approval given for the
Conditional Use Permit, subject to review and completion of a satisfactory lease agreement
between the City and the Applicant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the subject water tower site is currently zoned R-IA, single-family
residential. The site is currently occupied by the Shorewood Southeast area water tower, an
equipment shelter owned by AT&T, and telecommunications equipment owned by other
telecommunications companies and a parking lot, owned and maintained by the City of
Shorewoood.
2. That the land uses and zoning surrounding the site are as follows:
.
North:
East:
South:
West:
State Highway 7
Commercial, zoned P.U.D.
Cemetery, zoned R-IA, Single-Family Residential
State Highway right-of-way (former wayside rest), zoned R-IA
3. That Section 1201.23, Subd. 4a. ofthe Shorewood City Code provides for
governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures to be constructed within the R-
IA zoning district by Conditional Use Permit, subject to certain requirements of screening and
landscaping when abutting a residential use in a residential district.
4. That the Applicant's activity serves a valuable purpose in the community, and
there is a need for the activity and services provided by the Applicant in order that the
community be properly serviced, and that the Federal Telecommunications Act requires that local
governments accommodate personal communications services within their boundaries.
.
5. That the proposed use of the land is in accordance with the official City
Comprehensive Plan and will not adversely affect the general welfare, public health and safety of
the community.
6. That approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit should include a lease
agreement setting forth the rights and obligations of the parties to the Agreement.
CONCLUSIONS
That the Applicant's application for a Conditional Use Permit to expand its existing
antenna array as shown on Exhibit A is hereby granted, subject to the provisions of City Code,
Section 1201.04, Subd. 1.d.(I), the recommendations of city staff, the City's telecommunication
consultant, and the following additional conditions:
2
.
.
1. The grant and term of the Conditional Use Permit shall comply and be subject to
all ofthe terms and conditions set forth in a Water Tower Space Lease Agreement to be
negotiated between the City and the Applicant.
2. The Applicant shall relocate its antenna panels currently located on the stem of the
water tower to the top of the water tower.
3. The Applicant's plans, including structural calculations and analysis shall be
subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
4. This resolution, together with the Exhibit attached hereto and the Water Tower
Space Lease Agreement, be filed and recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar
of Titles within thirty (30) days of certification hereof.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22nd day of
April 2002.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
3
(INSERT EXHIBIT A - WATER TOWER DRWG.)
.
.
4
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
11 January 2002
RE:
Bowman, Richard- Subdivision/Combination
FILE NO.
405 (01.32)
BACKGROUND
.
Mr. Richard Bowman home is situated on approximately eight acres of land at 20025
Manor Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). He proposes to convey the
north 40 feet of his property to the owner to the north. Ordinarily, this would be an
extremely simple matter. However, the request is complicated by the fact that the
property to the north is located in Deephaven.
The subject property is zoned R-IA, Single-Family Residential. Mr. Bowman's home
sits atop a hill in the center of the site that drops off dramatically to wetland area to the
south and north. The north end of the lot is approximately 30 feet lower than the home
site. The Deephaven parcel contains 51,000 square feet of area, some of which is
wetland.
ANAL YSISIRECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed division/combination does not adversely impact any future
subdivision of the Bowman property, certain issues must be addressed as part of this
request.
1. Since the property will extend across municipal boundaries, it will have two
separate tax identification numbers. So that the 40- foot parcel is never conveyed
ft
~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
"'S
.
.
Memorandum
Re: Bowman Subdivision/Combination
11 January 2002
as a separate lot, it is recommended that protective covenants be recorded with
each parcel, stating that neither one will be conveyed without the other.
2. Since the above recommendation involves property in Deephaven, the City of
Deephaven must approve the division/combination.
3. No buildings should be allowed to extend over the municipal boundary.
Deephaven should handle all building permits.
Subject.to these provisions, approval is recommended.
Cc:
Craig Dawson
Tim Keane
Richard Bowman
Joan Young
-2-
18 LlJ "Co:'- ~.
101.65 1,.,
( 18) ~ .
:z: ,
l">i'i I
-:r;i I (r
g.... ("36) NORTH
'"
18
( 12)
+1
II'>
is ......I.?
~
~I
Oup ~"'-t ~
.'. p~t'~l .
. . Iii; '&';)1.'1;)"'11111 !:I/}
, ~,t!L:~ c ,~({{}LtlllaljJL,i:/
I
(~j) .
zg'
@
@
<C ~
. eo,~ \'\
~ . ~O~~~
2!ii:
~
~
I1Y
~
p~(ul '.1;~ 11~" C.O~"4't ~J
3'37. Is's~i'4!!'E '. r. See'44'4W 3. .';;;'
" :, SO' 1'!l'S/. 'II .
I . ~ 124.4'!l ~.
.11\'\ .~~
t.~"'" \1..' ,~
t, ~ . \11\. ..:'4 ..
, ".'5J> .... ~
I~r:." ~ .prP.~
!" ~~.. i.1 T OF
;- ",-t; "; LOT I
~,,~ 1.:'1 2 =
'. to- <C
, .' :be
... to'. ie =-
I~i , 10.0
"'I ~1;
, ~,~
'. . o-.t
100.08 .' lJ8. ,:81
. ~.~. . L:; r__.
OUTLOT A
(32)
"
:>
~. !.'
;,
..1
':1J :,.\'fJ"', ,
Ii ' <<I - ....:".~.. -" ~ _N~?:! '36l. 8~ 19~ l
,.\t'~. "':;:,.~.....~'...:.:-=-_.,.. _ ... _ _ ',;:'
. ~/'''O '.~ ._~ . --
'It .~
-P.~ ~ It .~.~.& ,PJ .
/.s;.. . .....\.J~.,:,
'. C:. '''~I ';;~{ ::'~~2~1j
. 'l~~~...'"
;~, ;~1~<" ' LAKE HOOPER
,,' (~~!.~~~l:~~B::~~~\t, ' -'1~
@ It..% ,,"I" .''-''. '.:; ~\l'il'~ . ~
. .@mO,O.'L......-' '. .:~. .' " u--
"\" . - ...~.\'.:. '0 ~
J'. - ,~., I ...... .. . ~ f.:...... ' . -r....:!;'.::..
.t"), lj /,'" ~~ ......~... I'" , .."", V~
,'.-, ;:~r' / ' \;'~~~""'J':I""'" -'~) "w I :r Doof:
.. ", ....'.:~.A.:.. . ~'~~i"<s'" 'PAPT OF j ~ ;;.. ~ i
"'-:.:;-. '''.' ....~. ; : 1.01 5 ~I > 0,1 ~
. ;'::l../'v/y'" ... 10 r<i~ (~2)' ~ '.::'
.' ,"'.'~'r.>,'.." (~jJ::. ~;;:'I . j (,':~) I ({4) U~)
...~t .....4\-~N89..I'J..J;.w~.z.J L"6 "Sf /. 100 100
.~.~Ae .~ =. ':'~';'i:.\':'" ~ .....-.... ~~'... 6.~"_ . ----- ~: . ...-.oF
,..~;~~~. ........."...~_.______..l~..__ _. _._
. . '. ..( t.
; ~ ' k Exhibit A
i ~ll l :' SITE LOCATION
P+':J,,~; Bowman Subdivision/Combination
" .'i~:~. ~:
(@5.)
. N ;Il.'..1l:.~. " ..; .
". I (. "."
.... 19~.. e.<
0> I
; " r.)r~ (ei
- 'IJ;\;'I:.:~
1
I
!
( 1:8)
I~O
PT (A' I
. 1
LOT Sf I I
(rn ( 18) :!
;?
,..,
( 2)
'f>{."k
,); vNlN
() 1Jc;.. "
~ I I, T 11fJA_
." .~~....-
! '
;.;i:D~C.f~v't\ ~\
".~ . 4.-
PArU \
'*'
NORTH
(Y,
, ..
.
.'
('(\
'.[j
't
~M4I~ R.f~;
1
C/TJ't:),.:"
6
',">
'.t
~
\I
\'J
If
5
98.800: =
Exhibit B
PROPOSED DIVISION
\,.
.
.
,
,
0I1.1r.hC'~ R(VISll.Pc
r ~iWH
c.... C;KcD
1-
/
,"
'.
'.
'\
,.,,.,,,
j ..
/'- Q;j
, ~ :lI
!,.11 ~ ~
",/
It'
~~f..~
~ / , .,'
/~ll\ \
, $ETB...c:x \ _, ...'-~
/ UM!.S .1)' \
, ""->> ",..~ \
/' '\. '\ [bel: <II
,.' , ..", DELNATCD
-': CITY or DfF,PHWCN \..~ \ wm_
. un__ '-'.:z.l"'>>';-'C.l'i'-6F-Sli6K~WOOO __n. - _n__ >.-- -0' _ "~~.. _n__
. ,/-"- ..--... ~~;.:.:.:: '. "-r;::":;..:~---,' .....;.-..-:.. :.~..:. :::"'\"--"..1')..1:"":~
" ~, "'... ~,' ~~tl '..l"I",h,t 1\' l(I Ii
" '''. .".'\..' ~~ I\.:t......' ~ ". :
CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY FOR
MARK A. KA WELL & ASSOC.
IN LOT 68, AUD. SUB. NO. 141
AND LOT 1, BLOCK '. R, BOWMAN ADDITION
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
~-
~
~~. ,
(toWl'
0(,
III .........
,"
1'... ,'"
,
.
::l
l>
~
III
.......... . ..
I .. ,... ,... ,"r , ....,. .
: ;,,: :: }: : :: ::\:
:. . _# _" ,,- 'OJ
. : i :
t~'" ~Ol ts:
'...~' i; :
Drcin.. and _."'l~t-J'''i
UUU'1 ...llImeIlh .: '
;! :
S 89'24' 15' I: 3JO.68
I HE.u.y ClR,..t T...T Tit> ....~ U-'tf'......ToOol Q> ""'!JIlT
WMj PfttPlJc(u IT .... ~ W"'. h. I_h', .I_........~ .ur.
1I....t I .." A IM..,' LICtHSIT
IUMI'CIlI \1<<_ IIf: LAOS.. \I
SC...E
.... '"',..,"
I
r'r"
,"'--
,.'
<~~.'
LEGL ,l,[J[SCHII' T ION Cl' l>l<CMlS(s:
lol ~e. Avdilo,' . SUbcli.i$lQtI Numb.. U 1. He,onopin CO<.Il\Y, Millil~."lo
ALSO
Tllo North 40,00 roel of Lot I. Ill,,,,.. I. R BOwI.tAH ADDITION
Tl1iw W\Mv., ir\l."ds to Iho. the boundaric. at 'h. Gbove de~,..'b.,' Ilfore"~.
It do!'. not (l11tp\lft to It\ow on)' ot"-' irllfU'ovements Oi *'t'roactvne:ntro..
n : ~ on marker
Oea-iN show.. (,It. tHIKIUJ IIfIlNI on assumed .,turn
Illr,lft: [l(ist6"q spot elevation. In.",,, sea Ie"el dutunl
DArc
DbC....IIUN
GRONBERG &: ASSOCIATES, INC.
tION$.tTNG IJ<<HLR5, LAII! S1I1\fYOftS, Sill PlAH(1lS
44~ N. \Yl.LO'tI DR. LON!; LME:. t.foI. :'~J!l6
952-47.1' 4141
Exhibit C
DEEPHA VEN PARCEL
_" ~L~
ClAn , 1. ... ,
.
.'
March 18,2002
FILE COpy
n-~ "r;:~~'~1~:;~:~'" ... '-I-"~;::-'-':;:~:-';:--i--:'\--l
nl l...., 1.--/1 (I '..' I" , " \,
U .~.::-.:.~:::~:..._. -- .' \..1 ,:.;,'"' '..', !
.... ! \ ij
i ) I
U MAR 10 ~,r,',,) : '.' III
::J L,-,,,_ : J I
,jl
-.I
----_.,~
Brad Nielsen
Planning Director, City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
J2 . .. J' AL,r"""''/ J '
f-)c~)''''f,t,}>>)'')I<t.'.- /'d" f
1. I /"".,~" ~,
4",(,{"..c"'t.l( '. "" j\, \.",r" .
Dear Brad,
Mark Kawell contacted me in regards to his property at 19915 Manor Road. As you know, this
property is split between our two cities. He told me that the City of Shorewood wanted
assurances that the City of Deephaven has deemed this property buildable.
Mr. Kawell and I discussed this situation a few months back. Through this discussion, it was
decided that the property could be developed based on a side yard setback measured from the
city limits, rather than the southern property line that lies in Shorewood.
No Planning Commission or Council action will be required unless he is unable to meet this
setback requirement.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
.J\
;'
J
)'~M
Gus Karpas
Zoning Coordinator
~0Ij
Cc: File
Mark Kawell
City Offias: 20225 Cottagewooa 1<gati 'lJeepnavenJ :Jv{innesota 55331 (952) 474.4755 :Ja7( (952) 474 -1274
~
"It. ,
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
.
DATE:
29 March 2002
RE:
Oak View Estates - Preliminary Plat Revisions
FILE NO.
405 (02.02)
This item was continued from the 6 March meeting to 2 April. Issues raised by staff
have since been resolved as follows:
.
A. Street LocationlDesign. The cul-de-sac will remain on the east side of the
property, but it will access Chaska Road nearer the west side as recommended by
the City Engineer. This provides a new intersection with better sight lines than
what currently exists. The old intersection will be removed and the driveway for
the property to the east of the subject site will use the new intersection to the west.
The street right-of-way width and cul-de-sac diameter will both be reduced,
providing more lot area for the units and more flexibility in the location of the
buildings. This will enhance tree preservation on Lots 1 and 2.
B. Lot Sizes/Setbacks. The revised plat will result in all unit lots complying with the
minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement. By reorienting the building on Lot
1 to face the new cul-de-sac, site alteration is significantly reduced increasing the
chances to save larger trees on the westerly half of Lot 1.
C. Tree Preservation/Reforestation. Exhibit A illustrates the location of significant
trees on the property. As mentioned in A. and B. above, more trees are able to be
protected with the revised plat. The property will be subject to the maximum
eight trees per acre replacement. As part of the final plat submission, the
developer should submit a landscape plan, signed by a registered landscape
n
'-" PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
. s>c.
.,
\
.
.
Memorandum
Re: Oak Ridge Estates - Revised Preliminary Plat
29 March 2002
architect, concentrating replacement trees along the east side of the new street and
along the south end of the project.
The Planning Commission may wish to request a review of the final plat in this
instance to review the final landscape plan.
Subject to these changes and the recommendations from the previous reports,
approval of the preliminary plat is recommended. The applicant must submit a final
plat within six months of Council approval of the preliminary, or the approval is void.
Cc:
Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Arnie Zachman
-2-
'.
/
/
/
/' ~0.1'
./ 'CO
/
1/
/
/
~o//
/
. "~ //
, ~~~/
~~//
/
/
"
.
\.
---
eo
~
~
t
li\
C)
... C')
60
~
~
~
Rot~t ~
i Id i,
, ,.....
- I '
N
1/
L-
, ',,/V
.///i./;~ .
i
.
I
~
Exhibit A
U'
OAKVIEW ESTATES
OWNER:
s N
Z8 COMPANI~S
9101 M~OUY C1RCL~
GOLD~N VALL~Y. MN 55427
PHON~: (76J) 59J-IJ22
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
p~~~,
", 16/1 HIGHWA Y 10 N.~.
SPRING LAK~ PARK, MINNeSOTA 554J2
PHONe: (76J) 780-4100
E
Q JO 60
~... I
SCAL! IN FE!T
I INCH - 3D FE€T
Legal Description
Lot 279, AudllDt's Subdivision Number 135, Htmnep/n County, Minnesota
SI1l! DESCRIPTION
"-
"
"
"
"
----~--------------------------------
" \
" "
", "
, "
" "
" "
" "
" "
" "
" "
"" "
" cP" "
'\\~ " "
" "
" 1;: " "
'\~ "
'\~ "
,\"".1- "
" "
"~ ""
" "
,,~ '\
" "
" "
" "
" "
,l' " "
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ~
-----~-------i
" " i ;
" "
'\ "
'\ "
, "
and
That psr1 of Lot 168, Audltor's SubdMs/cn Number 135, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, wflIch Res East of the following desctibed line:
Commencing st the northeest comer of the Southeast QusMr of the
SoulhwestQuSfterofSectlon 34, Township 117, Rangll23 West of the 5th
Pnnc/Piil'Miiilil-;7h6n& ~ri7IlfSlRTIJd~ ~38-
minutes, 01 seconds West sIong the north line of said Southeest QuSfter of
the Southwsst Quarter a distance of 350.00 feet to the point of beginning of
the line being described; thence South 7 degree$, 06 minutes, 08 seconds
eest to the south line of said Southeest QusMr of the Southwest Quarter,
and said line than ending.
-\--,----
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
EXCEPT that psr1 therof lying North of Stale Highway Number 7.
LOr
"-
168 >
JJZ.OZ
+1
"
.....
...
...
...
'\
~,
,~
.....
\,
...\
'.,
''Ii,
ARCA OF PROPfRrY . .OS.!,J. 5.'- (Z.51 AC.)
! PROPOSED TOWNHOME: UNITS
LOT REQUIREMENTS: ZONING R-RA
FRONT SE19ACIC .J5 .T.
SlOE S019ACIC '0 .T.
KMSE19ACIC ~n
_UIol LOT FRONTACC '00 .T.
LOT OD'lH 120 F'T.
,;
l>
,JJ6
!J07,7,J 5OO'Z8'21"W
PROJECT I . 2129
COMPUTER DRAWING. 2t29.dwg
DAI<'VIEW ESTATES
..
III
; !
~
J
~ I
~
~
1" ~
liaS
~~
~~
· h~!
I]I~'
::eal
J~i~
~=~
~ II!
A o~
o
.... i
~
m
i
I
I;~. ~ I
i:~i II
~~~IS ~
I-I I
il'l~
-I"
Ii! ;
~!jn
I
~
i
....
~
:>..
ex:
~
~
.......
oj
It
s
i
I
i
'C5
~
il
.
...
~ I I I
C1
"' ..
..
OAKVIEW ESTATES 5 N
! ! ~
c ~
0 .1Q '0 i
~ I ~
I
SCAL. IN FE.T
I INCH . JO FE.T
I!!
~
.
OAKVlEW ESTA TES
\
\
\
\ 2
1 \
\
1
@
@)
s
MA TERIALS
SANITARY
8" MAIN - SDR J5 pvc
S~RVlC~ - SCHE:DUL~ 40
WATERMAIN
NONE:
INDIVIDUAL WELLS
TOTAL # OF WELLS - 5
WELL LOCA nON TO BE: VERIFIED
ALL 8" SANITARY MAIN " 0.40%
PROJECT # . 2129
COMPUTER ORA WING . 2129.Dwr1
m
~
I
f~
iiiW
~a"
~:ill
II!I~
~ih
~..p
,I"I~
_at~
~
~
~
-
;:::!
Jo;;
:::>
)..
ct
~
~
......
m
~
~
I
J
'0
~
'\
\.
\.
\.
-\-\-------------------------~--------------------------------
\ \ \.
\ \ \. \.
\ \. \.
\ \. \.
\ \. \.
\. \.
\ \. \.
\ \. \.
\ \ \. \.
x...~ \. \.
~"i. \ \. \.
\\ \ \. \.
'\ \ L.Dr \.~ \.\.
\ ~ \.
\ \ \. \.
\.~ \.
\ ~ \.
\ ~~ \.
@) @) \. "".l- \.
\. \.
\. \.
('b \.
, \.
\.~ \.
\. \.
\. \.
\. \.
\. \.
\. \.
\. \.
\.
\.
\.
\.
\.
\.
\.
\. ~
-----~-------I
\. \. i ~
\. \.
\. \.
\. \.
"\ \.
g I
i
~ l
i
~ j!
~ ~I
!
~
... ~
~ i I I
C2
~
!
~~,
r
'!! ~
~
!!
L
m
t-.::
~
m
~
~
s
~
6
DN/MII/JO OIJOO3tJ
~
~ a eg
~ - Ii I
8 g e
i i
bf Ili;t S' illl
~ ~~ ~ ~~ I'"
~ bli .......w ;l
~ ~.. I ~~ l;!
i d ~ ~! ~;
~ ~- .. ilai !
~ ~m ~ !i ~
; : ~
~
FJIOS6IJUfW '{JOOIMIJClltS JO AI.O
UKXlfius-sssBd -71Wi3
0rzs-08i. (&9i.J xtI:l OOIro8i. (&9i.J 3NOHd
ZC"99 V10S3NM 'W 'S17<.'OJI/3NNlW :1'N OlAV. 'MH!JIH 00 U9t ,
.lNlrf.... "..., ,J.-DI'l
.~~~
-.
fl" ,-." t3
.fK .. o' ""IS
.....
"" .......,
~ ~
~ '"
2o~
<>~~~
li~~
e~~~
~~ .~
",..g\:1
cs."'",
~~~li!
~I~ni
~ \';~e!l
~
~
'"
i:l
~
m
Iij
.....
Q
~
C!)
~
a Ii II
~
~
~
~
~
I.
~h
'"
gh
"'j!;~
t1ElU
~tl2
~!::~
~gf
~~,., ~
~ ~
~ ~i
~ r!
~ ~~
~.:~
~~~~
i'l d ~
~~ i~
~~~lS
d~~
~I:i~
~ t ~i"'~
ill'"
"' "' "'''' i!1:r ~ l\
J5St'jf ,Jt1IIRIJIJ
-dfP~1
N'v'1d fJNIOVl:/fJ AI:/VNIW/731:/d
"""",
.....
-.,.,~'"
,....,
831'(1.83 M3b1>N'O
.r~.ID~.Js,.,~$tt'"
..1I1tlIIfJ~~0JSNJ2ll
A. ..".. , JwtlI tIIW NQISIIItMIS ~:J7IIIO
All lI1DNfJ IIfJ.MAS fIJI/r"" 5.... Jt/Dd1IIlIO
~r~ 7W1ifbfl IWfI IJUIQ:I A.IJIO'I I
I
I // I
1/1
/
~ I i / I
3i ~~ I.l. / I
~ ii~- ill ~ ~ ~ ~ti!1 ~ /
~!il~8~~1 e ~ ~ 5. ~i~ ~ / I /
~~~~t'lll ~"~12,, ~~~~ ~h ~ / I / /
~.. ..o~ "'......ih. oil ~ "'~ /
~;~lll!~~! ~~~~; :~~~ ~l!1: 5 / / -1'
jglllS l!i51 i:!~"'!i! ~~~~ '" --i'ill! /
""i!i ~ '" !il:h i!!"~'" l!illlU56 / I
Gii!~~g~ G~2a:' "'u'" ~::l~::'1!! /
~Ili:"'''''''''''' "ell'~\!i ~ "'t ""'~O ~ / / I
~ !i~ig~r"' ~fi~~ ~~~~ ~~d i / / / I
~1Il~l!1~~ ~~~l!i~ ~~~~ nl!ig~ /
/ / I
I // // I
I / /
/ /
I / /
I / /
I // 1//
: /// ~~//
/ /
I / ~~/
I ,G~/ '/
I ~\/
I /
I ~~/
I S'/
I //
I /
/
I /
I //
I /
I //
I /
1//
/f/
~ ~~ih/ I
~ ~"2~ I
~1lI1!!~l!1~",l!i .
5illO;~~"'~S I
"'::ll!iS" ~~~lli
i~~m~ g~~~ I
ug~~~"'''''bl I
l!ilCAhlliSi:Ja
",/:!ill,,~ o~l!iill I
hU~~"'Ie!::l
..~~~~!9;~~ I
",\';:lg.. 8"'''''''
~I!!"i:l~ - ..I!:~ I
i:il\~~!ll!i~~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
m
1!
III
~
~
~
~
'"
i:l
\:l
~
Ci
~
~
o
..
/
/
/
/
/
"
.."':./....~ ---..
, .
......."
"
,",,' ,"', ..
,,::/~<:-;:. '-::;>.;;/
/:,~'~'~'..:- ..
I
I
\
\
I
,
I-
a
-.J
~.
",.," -. ~ -.:--.' .
~~
=~ I
~ t~
....,. if
~a ~
AW I~
~!~ ;
'" ~;<
~ 'lltli:
l!i"' ~
...l "
ti~:> ~ti
~ ~ Ii! A! ~ I:!"
~I ~~I~~~
'" li1 ... ~ '" .. ~ :go
t!i!i l~~~~t-~
~~ 2;:::.itl!!j!il"'
~I!! ~~~:~~~
~ ill "'!!"'''' i '" ~
~~ j~~~ i~
~1Il ~15l l:l~
.... ,,""
:::-~ =1'
~~~~
~ i:1' -;-.;;- ~
f
III
..
I ~
t ~
~ m
~
l~ u
~I ~
~I g ~
.. II
~I ~ ~
~I ~ ~
s.g
-I
I~ ...
..
Ii i
wootJue-sssfJd -71'rIYV3
ore!;-()9L (e9L))('(:/ OO/.rOSL (&9LJ 3NOHc1
Z&t19!i tI.1OS3NNIVV 'Sn0dtl3NNlVV 3'N 01 II tlMH '()IH 00 1191 ;
UO&-.. JIft'I "..,.",
.~~
DNIM lfIKI CJH(Y.}3Il
dI'O
8M1J
.A8
~
~
~
~
o
I !lli!l;l!ll!!,!l
ha
. . .
I =.t~~=~=_~~~IQ~t
5 i"=~=~~~~~i=~ii
II
III
MI~
......
~~~
eee
i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!
I I
~ I
~ ~
I l!lll;!!l;;.!!.!l,lll!l!!!lll!
I ~~~8~=.~~a~a-~_.~,.~~a~..~~~~~
5 IISilaSiii~i~~ii.'.~I....~iiii
..
~ ~!~S~3~~!~~~~593;~~9~~!~~~~!!%
2 ~-~---------------------------
~
t--::
~
LU I ~~~~~;~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~_I..~~t
~ S ~D~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~a~g~~2~~:~~~~
i II_____._~-_.=._~~..~=-~I~....
~ i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~2~~~~~~E~~~
~
:$
~ I !';lllllS;;,;!!;!!,;!!;!!!!lii
a I ~~~~-.~. .-~ --~ e~.~~~.Q~~~.
S _.,~~-~_~~~.__~_._.o~~~Q~.~~.~
~ ~~.~;ii~~N~U~~~~~~._'~~~~~~~gti
~ ===....._~~~~~~~II:I=.=.===~.=
I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~lfi~lf~~~
~ aa~ ~~a~.~~~..~.~ ~ ~.~ l~~~t
! ~-~ -~~---~-~---~ ~ ~-- ---~~
..
I ~i~~~~~II~i~i~li~i~~~~~~~~~~~~
I ii.!llill!!iiil.i;il!!ll!;i!!!
I .;~~~~~8~q.~~~=~~~~~;~_.:~a~=a
I ~ ~~....~~~~~~~~~~~.~.dJ~~.g~.
i ~ =~==..I-._-____.I~I..II.._II
i ii~~~~~~~fi~~~~~~~~~iiilil~I~~j
.
l'
BJOs8UU!W 'pooMaIOlIS JO I.no
.....rlOloWQO
.........
.,.,..,
.M .~, ""'" ~
:II'"
".
N'Vld 331::11. Al::lttN/VV/73I:Jd
"'"
-"""'"
.....
Wl/.
S3.J.VJ.S3 A13W1\fO
VIOSJllllNlt JtI In'lS JHI .IfI SII,.l
"1lJiINfI1/J3IIIIIIIJ~4JS1rO:WJ
AWI'rrwll.... t1/WlWOISMirlIQ!iJ311#1t1
tAlI MJIIIIWI .,.1I1f". tDIINDtI'" I""""'''
..,t'3JOM' w.., SIHt Jt'HI ...",m.IB3WJH ,
/
/
/
/
/
/
1 //
/
/
~o//
/
/
~/
~r./
,G~//
~'j/
/
~~//
s~ r; /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1083
10B2
~
~
l:l
I
070
OJ
\0
""-j
0123
l-
f:]
-..J
~~..'''~: 32 . ..~. 25 ~
0128 01~~ 0"
o ~135
M!:! 013Y
68 co
!:!
~39
, 1140
.' 1141
1 2
"co\O
..,...,...,.
---
---
~
-
~
./'/' ::::::
--- ~
inN
cc
"
If)
c..
,.....
./
./
I ././
./(
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
./
./ I
./
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
././ I
./ I
I
I
I
~
I
/
~
..
~
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
26 March 2002
RE:
Marso, Jim -'- Minor Subdivision/Combination
FILE NO.:
405(02.09)
BACKGROUND
Mr. James Marso has purchased the property at 6060 Strawberry Lane (see Site Location
map - Exhibit A, attached) and eight feet of the vacant land to the south of it. He
proposes to divide the property into two single-family lots as shown on Exhibit B.
. The property is presently zoned R-ID, Single-Family Residential and contains 44,138
square feet of area. A single-family dwelling and two outbuildings currently occupy the
land. Mr. Marso is also purchasing the eight feet to the south in order to create a lO-foot
setback for the existing home while maintaining adequate width on the new southerly lot.
You may recall that this property was previously part of a larger plat that included the
land to the south of the subject property and would have resulted in six lots (see Tritch
Estates - Exhibit C). The owners of the property were unable to complete that project
and the parcels are now being sold and developed separately.
ANAL YSISIRECOMMENDATION
As suggested in the review ofthe previous plat, the right-of-way for Strawberry Lane is
substandard in width. As such, approval of this division should include the dedication of
additional right-of-way. The applicant's plans show a line, labeled "future right-of-way",
but the proposed legal descriptions for the new lots do not reflect any r.o.w. dedication.
ft
'-.1 PRINTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER
~rD
Memorandum
Re: Marso - Minor Subdivision
26 March 2002
Nor do the lot sizes indicated on the drawings subtract any area for r.o.w. The
applicant's surveyor should provide new legal descriptions for the lots, subtracting the
area for the r.o.w. and recalculated the area of the lots based upon the additional r.o.w.
dedication. This will not adversely affect the proposed division since the lots will still be
in excess ofthe R-1D zoning requirements. For example, the southerly lot will still have
approximately 15,910 square feet of area (10,000 square feet is required). The northerly
parcel will contain 19,100 square feet. Both lots exceed the 75-foot minimum width
requirement.
.
Since the proposed division requires only one sewer service connection and no street
improvements, tree preservation can be addressed as part of any future building permit
for the newly created lot. The applicant has provided deeds for drainage and utility
easements as required by Shorewood's Subdivision Code.
Approval of the applicant's minor subdivision is recommended subject to the following:
1. The applicant's attorney must incorporate the legal description for the additional
right-of-way into a deed dedicating the right-of-way to the City of Shorewood.
2. New legal descriptions for the lots should also be provided by the applicant's
surveyor.
3. The applicant's attorney must provide a legal opinion or title commitment for
review by the City Attorney.
.
4. The applicant must provide the items listed in 1-3, above within 30 days, at which
time the request will be placed on the next available Council agenda
consideration.
5. Prior to release of the resolution approving the minor division, the applicant must
pay $1200 as a local sanitary sewer access charge and $1500 as a park dedication
fee for the newly created lot. Credit is allowed for the lot with the existing house
on it.
6. Once the applicant receives the Council resolution approving the subdivision, he
must record it with Hennepin County within 30 days.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Jim Marso
-2-
,},
Q ~~ "'f\
,},
f--
L.--- RA'WBE'P.~>-- ~
. ~~ \ I~
,}, 0 ~ L.----~
--..: ~
,}, .....\ t:T ~~
0
o~
2 ,-.;y RD
. ^-.:
!!!
-- \
\y Subject ~~ ~
ProDe
STRA\lVBE R~
I
~EVE RL'f DR CIR h I ~
IX -<(
0 M~PLE - J
~ P 0 0 R ,... N
J VE ... ...
<( f--- e;; ,. ....
~ .. ~,
- ~
~ ~ 1::l. -
lu fg ~ $:
E\J woc - IT ~ III DAI KL EA 1=1
: ~ SH' DR JL / 0 R
1/ I In
/ /
,},
RD
SH PDINTE COURT
,},
SH POINTE CIRCLE
)
"--'
,},
CHANHASSEN
62ND ST W
400
I
o
~OFeel ~
N
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Marso - Minor Subdivision
-
ClD
!"z
8~
~x
-iC
~~
o~
~x
<.0'"
-lOCI)
>g
~x ,
. ,
~ "------1 _
:
0\-
9>...,
0'2
. - TWIN
}If 974.0
+41
:>~o
~~
~
"'rc
~
~
~
"
"
"~
.
x
co
~
"
\9>"'.0
\,
~
\
"
~
.,
.~
f( .~
~" ...,.
~.
""
49;]
"
+"p..)
-'tcP
"
"
-
-."..
....-
"
"
o
01
"
~
.Q
. I\....--
"
')
,,' "
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
f:JV
,0
.
+
.9>.
or",
-1
o
t
-p
()
:.t
~
~
z
0......
~..".
==
co
o
;!
fTI
-I
.....
t-J
o
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
"
'\.
..
.
NORTH
-,
~''''TOT^L'Sfii:''--127:246 SQUARE 'FEET OR 2.9212 ACRES
~ -f
; 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT UNE5.
55 OlHERWlSE INDICATED. AND BEING 12 FEET IN
of AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNE5 A5 SHOWN
HE PLAT.
-~to~~
C
I V
, r ".
~ ~
"
J
,I
~ ( ~ ~ I
01 V
\1' tI
ff
-r ~ ~
,
\
~~.
"" / .;I'
..
. -.
,
/ ..'...... J
1~ I PU--":=-:;;:"
r':!.....\' llJI '
:J =:>
h"J l;;~ I
/'..;,,'J .
~"cl
I~~ "
.I' "
IYI
I
I
AI
'"
AI
IV
E
,
~
LiJ
tl:J
~~
"C
~
(.::
Exhibit C
PRE~OUSPRELThflNARYPLAT-
,_, TRITCH ESTATES
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
TO: City Council
FROM: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator Cj)
DATE: April 18, 2002
SUBJECT: Excelsior Fire District 2002-2022 Capital Equipment Program
The joint powers agreement for the Excelsior Fire District requires that amendments to the District's
Capital Improvement Program/Finance Plan be accomplished no later than April of any year. To be
approved, the amended Plan must receive approval by at least two-thirds of the member city councils.
The EFD' s 2003 operating budget, which will implement the CIP ~ requires approval by a simple
majority of the member city councils.
The EFD Board has recommended approval of the revised Capital Equipment Program (CEP). Fire
Chief DuCharme's memorandum (attached) explains the changes made from the CEP approved in
2001. In general, the financial commitments in the program are consistent with the CEP currently in
effect.
.
The capital program for facilities will be forwarded separately by the EFD.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the 2002-2022 Capital Equipment Program of
the Excelsior Fire District.
-#'A
n
~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
.
,.
EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT
339 3RD STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
CHIEF" MARK DUCHARME
CF"F"ICE 952.40 1.BBO 1
FAX 952.474.3144
Date:
April 17, 2002
To:
Craig Dawson
City Administrator
City of Shorewood
From:
Fire Chief Mark DuCharme
RE:
Capital Equipment Plan
Craig,
Attached you will find the revised 2002 Capital Equipment Plan. Every year this plan is
updated and sent to the member Cities for approval.
This year only minor changes have been proposed. These changes address the issues of
account balances changing drastically during the life ofthe plan.
· The beginning balance is actual as of January 1, 2002, although un-audited.
· The expenditures for the Utility Trucks are actual.
· The payments for the new Tanker and Engine will start in 2003 instead of 2002
with payments negotiated lower than the original plan.
· The amount of contribution from member Cities for FY 2002 has been reduced
from $ 100,000 to $ 95,000.
It is the intention of the Fire District Administration to attempt to keep all fund balances
as consistent, from year to year, as possible and to keep contributions from member
Cities within sound managerial criterion.
Should you or representatives of your City have any questions, please give me a call.
It is a real honor to serve the City Of Shorewood.
celsior .iStrlct
.
2002 . 2022
~.
Ipital Equipment Plan
hide Replacement Schedule)
39 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
306 382,227 472,795 440,921 333,433 312,704 299,349 185,326 311,029 381,580 515,699 594,225 783,936 933,856
~
)44 58,544 206,514 284,534 177,401 173,990 273,990 41,064 95,000 39,960 112,259 0 49,277 264,000
.65 19,111 23,640 22 046 16,672 15,635 14,967 9,266 15,551 19,079 25,785 29 711 39,197 46,693
) 0 16 000 15,000 0 0 0 7500 0 0 10.000 0 0 0
000 130,000 135,000 140,000 140 000 145,000 145,000 150,000 150,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 160 000 170,000
465 149111 174640 177 046 158 672 160635 159 967 166 766 165551 174079 190 765 189 711 199197 216 693
227 472,795 440,921 333,433 312,704 299,349 165,326 311,029 381,580 515,699 594,225 783 936 933,856 866,549
...... 'Updated estimate with Lease I Purchase of Tanker and Pumper
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
City Council
Craig W. Dawson, City Admioistrator ~
Bradley J. Nielsen, Director of Planning
TO:
.
DATE:
April 18, 2002
SUBJECT: AT&T Lease Agreement, Southeast Water Tower
AT&T has made application for a new conditional use permit (CUP) for use the Southeast Water
Tower site for wireless communications. (This matter is scheduled as Item 8A on the Council's April
22 agenda.) If the new CUP is approved, a new lease agreement between AT&T and the City will be
required.
Staff and representatives of AT&T have been negotiating the terms of the new lease. What is
proposed is essentially an identical lease to which the parties agreed for the West Water Tower a few
years ago. This approach will make the administration of the agreements much simpler.
.
The final copy of the Lease Agreement will be available from the City Attorney at Monday night's
Council meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
If the City Council has approved the CUP for AT&T's use of the Southeast Water Tower site, staff
recommends that the City Council approve the lease agreement with AT&T and authorize the
Mayor and City Administrator to execute the agreement.
~Cf~
n
~J PRINTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER