The URL can be used to link to this page

022502 CC Reg AgP ;,;.. "'" -' a- t.. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love _ Garfunkel Liz6e Zerby _ Turgeon _ B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, February 11, 2002 (Att.-#2A Minutes) B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, February II, 2002 (Att.-#2B Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.-#3A Claims List) B. Glen Road Street Light Request (Att.-#3B Planning Director's memorandum) C. Approval of Goals and Priorities for 2002 (Att.-#3C Administrator's memorandum) D. Approval of a New Tobacco License for the Hilltop Restaurant (Att.-#3D Deputy Clerk's memorandum) E. Approval of Appointments to the Shorewood Park Foundation Board of Directors (Att.- #3E Administrator's memorandum) 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) .. . ., .. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 25, 2002 PAGE20F2 ... 5. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS A. Presentation of Award for former Park Commissioner B. Report from Tad Shaw, MCES Advisory Board Representative 6. PARKS A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held February 12, 2002 (Att.-#6A Draft Minutes) B. Facility Use Agreement (Att.-#6B Public Works Director's memorandum, Agreement) C. Ordinance for Motorized Vehicles Driving on Fields or Green Space (Att.-#6C Public Works Director's memorandum, Ordinance) 7. PLANNING - Report by Representative A. Denying a Request for a Variance (Att.#7A Planning Director's memorandum, Draft Resolution) Applicant: Dewey Carter Location: 26330 Noble Road 8. GENERAL A. Setting the Date of the 2nd Council Meeting in May (Att.-#8A Administrator's memorandum) 9. ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS 10. REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. Gideon Glen 2. County Road 19 Intersection B. Mayor and City Council 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURN . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 25 February 2002 .. Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the verified Claims List for Council approval. Agenda Item #3B: Residents of Gideon Glen have requested a street light for the comer of Glen Road and County Road 19. This request was actually approved by the Council once before, but never completed due to the cost of installation. Our Xcel representative has now indicated that the light can be placed at the requested location without the additional cost. Since there has been a lapse in time since the original approval, staff has notified property owners within 500 feet of the intersection that this is being considered. Staff recommends approval of the request. The Planning Director also recommends that the design of the light be consistent with what will be done on the County Road 19 intersection/intersection project. Approval of this request requires a simple majority vote by the Council. I'. Agenda Item #3C: Council reviewed a draft of the goals and priorities for 2002 at its February 11 work session. The goals and priorities have been updated to include those items Council added. It is recommended that Council approve the 2002 goals and priorities. Agenda Item #3D: The Hilltop Restaurant has submitted an application for a license to sell tobacco products. The Hilltop plans to sell cigarettes from a vending machine that is only . accessible by the employees. As all application requirements have been satisfied, and the background check was clear of any tobacco related violations, staff recommends approval of a License to Sell Tobacco Products to the Hilltop Restaurant. A simple majority vote is required for approval. Agenda Item #3E: The by-laws of the Shorewood Park Foundation provide that the Board of Directors nominates candidates to serve on the Board, and that the City Council affirms the appointments. The Park Foundation Board of Directors is nominating two individuals to fill expired terms. The terms of these two nominees would run through February 28, 2005. Approval requires simple majority vote. n ~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - FEBRUARY 25, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Page 2 of2 Agenda Item #5A: Kate Lynch Bix will be present this evening to receive recognition for her two years of service on the Park Commission. Agenda Item #5B: Tad Shaw, MCES Advisory Board Representative, will provide an update on the MCES Advisory Board. Agenda Item #6B: At its meeting on February 12, 2002, the Park Commission accepted a revised Facility Use Agreement and requested it be forwarded to Council for approval. Approval of the Agreement requires simple majority vote. Agenda Item #6C: The Park Commission reviewed the Ordinance relating to the operation of vehicles in parks or on public grounds. The Commission is recommending that the parking of vehicles be amended t include areas that are striped and/or posted parking .. stalls, and that the violation fine be increased from $35 to $200. Approval of the Ordinance Amendment requires simple majority vote. Agenda Item #7 A: Dewey Carter has requested a 3D-foot front yard setback variance from the City in order to comply with the MCWD' s setback from the wetland on the property. The staff report for this item recommended a redesign of the proposed house that would at least lessen the amount of the variance. The applicant requested additional time to revise the plan, but has since failed to submit anything. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the request. A draft resolution has been prepared for your review. Unless the applicant quickly withdraws the application, he would have to wait six months to submit a new one. Adoption of the resolution requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #8A: The second Council meeting in May falls on the Memorial Day holiday. In . past years, Council rescheduled this meeting for the Tuesday following the holiday. Council will need to approve a motion scheduling an alternate date for the second meeting in May. " . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2002 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MINUTES D\\~fl 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, and Turgeon; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Councilmember Zerby B. Review Agenda Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda for this evening, noting there would be an Executive Session immediately prior to adjournment regarding ongoing litigation. Administrator Dawson requested a Report on the Joint Public Safety Facility be added as Item 9A5, and a Report on Land Use Regulation Voting Requirements be added as Item 9A6 on this evening's Agenda. Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 4/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes, January 28, 2002 Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Approving the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 28, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, January 28, 2002 Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of January 28, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 4/0.' C. City Council Work Session Minutes, January 28, 2002 Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of January 28, 2002, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein: A. Approval of the Verified Claims List . -::p; cJ It CD g. a ~ =CDen~ ~ 't:I,< a ~. 0 0 CD CD = "1 aag-t'"4 CD 0 Q.. ~ aOI>>CD ir S:~ ~ Q.. .g ~ ='g~a a.~ e. tn a' _. [ = g ~ lB. = = "1 a' = g CD CD a "1 ~oa'tc :roga CDa=~ Q.. _. d . ~ a 'l>CDg~ ~ Q.. _. "1 en <::r o S a Fji' gog.t:p~ = CD 0 0 a = a ~ aCDS:::o <~n&' I>> "'d tn CD ::1. I>> en 0 g~~Mo) en "1 ~ ~~efa ena~en ::r _. s::: a ~ ~. el Pi' o Ili -. a'=OQ = CD CD OQ Bs:::as o CD CD o~ag. ~ Er en Fji' ~ OQ CD _. CD ~ < ~ a ~ o'~ Q.. CD. ~ ~. J'1 g ~ I>> ~ ==OQ a ~ Q.. .... Cll ::r = ~aCDg -. _ a' "1 ~~g.tc CD ,... ""'1 ~Q..CDO _. < ~ g.Sad g.n CD 0 ~~. 2 ~ ~ ~r CD -"1 ..Nn t-.)e. 0_ 0"" t-.)CD ~ en ~l n.... o::r ~ ~. _. en ~ = ....CD g g, s::: -. CD Ii' ~::r _.0 = = OQ en CD :>en ~g. = CD Q..Q.. I>> = . - ~. Cll ~ a en ~ ~ = g. CD n q' en~ 't:I ~ en ~ 't:I ~ o Mo) n g o .... 6' Cll ~ CD "1 ~ (lQ Cll o = en [ g. Fji' g. S:::'< :> n CDCD~8-0~ "'d~oB ~EroEr -OQ ~ ........ '" -Genen en 0 _ ~ ~. g.~[~~ Q..CD. _"1 E."'d """n ""Il) ~I>> I>> =Hp~_ OQ ~ en =: en.....I>>OCD Cll,.Q..=en ':]0Q..!!l,"1 ;s.a a:ll;! ~ o a 0 ;.+ 't:I S! -.= (ll 0 ~. ~ ~ Q.. = ~ _. ::r I>> Q.. "1gCD~a e=:~s:.g= enQ..~~O a g.Q..e.~ ~ CD ~. ~ 0 ~ n <:::r ~ ~. ~ ~ 't:I Q..'< f}l a' a ~ CD "Cl ;:rn::r=:o B g Fji'~ ~ o = "1 CD - OCDQ.. g :::.: 0 .... ~ ~. 0 ~ 0 "1 Q..= CD g''''d ~ ~g.~~ ~~=~s::: "1a'~oel .g ~ ;.+ ~t~ .... _ I>> = CD sa -'t:I OQ a Fji~ -t:pCD ~t-.)~oa o 0 ~ "10::r;;>en g- ~ ~ ~ 3. ~e.g'tng =_~~enen 00- ~~a5~ S' Iii ~ a OQ~g-~a' atn ~g ~ 00 ~ ~.... = . s g..... a ~CD~O s <-4 ~ ~. Q.. S. = ~ oaap. ~ ~ ::r CD "1 g o - o A ~r o Mo) CD < CD a en g, g. ~ CD < CD = ~. ~~ g-~ ~t'"4 ~ ~ t-.) oog OCD t-.)en t::p e. o 0 S ~ s:::Q.. S'~ = go ~g. g ~ s~ n'< o~ ~s- = ~ q'g- tn~ g-O' o't:l ~a O'CD = a en en ~ if .... Q.. o ~ ~. _en s:::B na tnOQ ..!!3e: 'e: = OQ I>> 't:I "1 .g o en e. ~ "1 en CD < .... o Cll en . ~ann g.CDOO 2 g. ~ ~ E OQ Fji' Fji' <<! en en ~[8'8' ~ CD ~ Iri s::: "1 S~gn . = e.~ = .... "5!.. OQ ~ 1>>-- o Il) 0 CD!I:l't:l en ,... 0 ~r a ~ CD _. Q.. .... 00 .::rQ..= a s'a Q..~~ ~ ;:r CD Cll CD "1 ~. en ::r e. 0 o ... 0 ~ a ~ CD Cll .... <enQ.. CD CD ~"1 0 a Mo)Q.. ~f8. ~al>> CD A n CD _. o ::t. g a ~ In ~.~~ ""nCll g 0 = a ~ ~ Cll _. g. ~~CD ~.~.~ ~ "1 f;; ~ n-> en =:00 o ......'" go~N Q..=O = 0 0 0(t..N Q..Q.."'d ~=e: "10~ ~ ~ en ~ a ~ CD = o a ~ "1 en i g. CD t:!2 o o "1 't:I a en Cll a CD Q.. e=: en CD g ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ t:r.l \il::l fIl ;g o a: ~ ~ ~ o o \il::l a: Q .... ... Q = "Cl ~ en en CD Q.. ,1:0. ""- p . 9 :> "Cl "Cl ., Q < ~ - Q .... ~ = - ,... ~ ~r CD t'"4 .c' = Q ., n ;- ., ="" '-c Q r::r t:l CD Ul () ., -s' .... o' = ~ = Q.. :> = .... ::r Q ., N' ~ .... o' = .... Q =: ... ., CD ~ :> "Cl "Cl ., Q < ~ - Q .... ~ a: ~ en en ~ lJQ CD ~ ::r CD ., ~ "Cl ... en .... t'"4 n' CD = en CD Q' ., n ~ .... =- CD ., S' CD ~ Q lJQ ~ a ~ t:r.l en .... ~ - ... en ::r ... = lJQ a: ~ ~ S'J w 8 w ~ Ul fIl "Cl ., S' lJQ (1 - CD ~ = I ~ t:l ~ t:l(1:> ~&.g. :!. CD os. ~..~5. :I J8 lJQ ~ 0 a.~ S' _ lJQz =::> ~ z "n Q.t:r.l nz Qo ~ . ., ~ t"4~ ... ,. a ~ ... :> ....= a ... 0 Q ., f: Q. S' Q'~ ., = . () "'dCD .,:> .g a CD CD ;:$..= ... Q. CD ... en = o~ c =- fit CD ... fIl Q.=- CD Q ....., ;~ Q fIlQ =-Q. Q N ~ Q -= ~ ... = = Q.lJQ ~ :>\il::l:> Q.CDQ. ~ "Cl Q ,.;I . ., "Cl en CD .... = (IJ ,,<II .., CD = "<=lJQ taS'\il::l Q ct. t:r.l e;<fIl Q.CDO Q t"4 = c:l ....~ =-- CD 0 a:z S' z = 0 ~. Q = = w ;11:'"' ~ = '""" nS'J Q ~ a :> a \il::l = CD = Ul "'Q ~- a t:r.l ... Q..Q = = () :> a."Cl ... "Cl Q Q = ... sa. ~ ... = = Q.lJQ fIl~ CD ~ 3. :; () =- ~ ~ -~ a:~ nen t:r.lQ $~ o n=::> QCDQ.. ag.g a tD a. = 'E. = =. = lJQ ~ (1~ fIlQfIl 550 ~.~ ~ ~,. n ~ ,. Q 1-1 a 0 a Z = Z ::.0 ~. <= t:lt;-' CD <= < '""" CD -.I 0''' "Cl ~ a :> g \il::l ....CD en tag. Q'a () ... ;ll:'"g c;')fIl ., = ~"Cl ="Cl ....Q ;:$.. ~ ... = = =lJQ S:(1 = Q lJQ = .... S' 5<1 ., C ~ fIl ct. CD Q = = o'Q ., .... ~ Iodloll:jn ~l'!l::3 , =~ w~ Q ~~n .... 0 Cl'I ~ i<z '"""n .t'"~ ~~ W0 5 ~ l'!l i o ~ ~ fI.l " CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES t FEBRUARY 11,2002 Page 3 of6 sports organizations to share City policies and regulations regarding continued use of the parks. He suggested an organizational meeting be held on Wednesday, March 13,2002, to share that information. Commissioner Callies questioned what the role of the Park Commission should be at the organizational meeting with the sports organizations. Councilmember Turgeon stated she believed the timing of this issue was critical as girls' sports teams were forming, and it was imperative to know whether adequate field time could be scheduled prior to mid-March of this year. She stated this issue had been discussed for the past 1.5 years. Further, she stated, in a similar situation a lack of respect demonstrated by a service provider would not be allowed to continue. She also expressed serious concern for the lack of diverse users within the City's park system. She stated she did not want old cycles of use to continue which left out other sports organizations. In addition, it was important to move the issue of scheduling and Park Management Services forward. She recommended the Parks Commission make a recommendation to Council regarding this matter. . Mayor Love stated he did not disagree and shared her concerns; however, he did not believe questions had yet been answered regarding the current use of the parks. In addition he was concerned that various groups of users were not being recognized. He stated he believed this to be a large problem without a quick solution. He stated it was important to demonstrate expectations and set priorities. Councilmember Turgeon stated the Koegler study of the Parks found all park users could be accommodated with accurate usage of time spent on the fields shared by the sports organizations. Mayor Love stated he did not disagree with these concerns; however, it was his understanding MCES would provide scheduling services this year. However, future plans beyond this year were questionable. Councilmember Lizee stated it was important to enable the Park Commission to deal with this issue. She did not think park users and additional sports organizations needed to be restricted by the current system of scheduling and park usage by various sports organizations. She thought it important for the Park Commission to be allowed to discuss this Agenda item and move forward. She stated to keep the status quo for another year would clearly be wrong. . Mayor Love stated he did not believe the intention for this year was to handle scheduling in-house. Commissioner Callies commented the Park Commission was also having difficulty arriving at consensus regarding this issue. She did not believe expectations had been defined by the Park Commission in terms of a progression of events relating to this matter. Councilmember Garfunkel agreed with the Mayor, noting until a decision was made regarding what to do and requirements established of what was needed, he did not think it prudent to change the current process of park management. He stated it was important to establish a comprehensive listing of priorities and expectations and present those to the sports organizations regardless of whether the scheduling of events was handled internally by Staff or externally by MCES. Mayor Love stated he was annoyed with the lack of a proposal being presented by MCES at this point in time, and questioned Engineer Brown as to the history of this request. Engineer Brown stated he met with two representatives from MCES approximately three weeks ago. These representatives thought a proposal for services could be completed by this date. He had tried contacting these. representatives four days prior to this meeting, and no phone calls had been returned as of this date. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 11,2002 Page 4 of 6 Mayor Love stated he would be willing to contact these representatives regarding this matter, as he was annoyed and believed the City was not being treated appropriately with a prompt response. ~ Councilmember Turgeon requested a deadline for a proposal being presented for consideration. Councilmember Lizee stated she believed the Park Commission had stated conclusions, and MCES had had ample time to respond to a previously established timeline. She stated she did not believe any more time should be given to preparing a proposal and suggested a 24-hour deadline. Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, allowing 5 business days for a proposal to be submitted from MCES. Motion passed 3/1, with Lizee dissenting due to her belief a deadline of February 12, 2002, was ample time for a proposal. Council thanked Commissioner Callies for her comments and report. Engineer Brown stated there were no other Parks issues to bring forward at this time, however, when the proposal from MCES arrived, he would place it concurrently on the Park Commission and City Council . agendas for consideration. 6. PLANNING Commissioner Pisula reported on matters considered and actions taken at the February 5, 2002, Planning Commission Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A. Approval of Subdivision Ordinance Revision Director Nielsen stated the following two items were related as the Planning Commission had recently spent a great deal of time reviewing and redrafting the Subdivision Regulations. He stated he would answer any questions Council may have of him regarding this matter. Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 380, "An Ordinance Adopting the Shorewood Subdivision Regulations. Motion passed 4/0. B. Approving the Publication of the Subdivision Ordinance Revision by Title and Summary . Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 02-019, "A Resolution Approving the Publication ofthe Subdivision Ordinance Revision by Title and Summary." Motion passed 4/0. Mayor Love thanked the Planning Commission and Staff for all hard work dedicated to this revision. 7. GENERAL There was Clothing further to report at this time. 8. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Inter-Agency Utility Agreement with the City of Tonka Bay t.' f . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 11,2002 Page 5 of6 Engineer Brown reviewed a utility agreement between the Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay for provision of municipal sanitary sewer and water services from the City of Tonka Bay to certain Shorewood properties. He noted these areas within the City were impractical to serve by Shorewood sanitary sewer or water service, due to topographical constraints or lack of an installed water system within proximity to these lots. Previously, the Cities had permitted lots adjacent to the City of Tonka Bay municipal boundary to connect into the Tonka Bay systems to obtain services. This agreement stated a residents desiring the use of Tonka Bay facilities would be charged at the same rate as the residents in Tonka Bay receiving the same benefit. Mayor Love thanked Engineer Brown, as well as the Shorewood and Tonka Bay staff, for efforts regarding this agreement. Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 02-020, "A Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Tonka Bay for Utility Services." Motion passed 4/0. 9. REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. Gideon Glen Administrator Dawson reported a Cooperative Agreement would be discussed at the February 28, 2002, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Meeting regarding Gideon Glen. 2. County Road 19 Intersection Engineer Brown reported design plans had been submitted to Hennepin County for review and redesign if needed. He noted the timing of right-of-way issues to be critical to completion of the project in a timely manner. 3. Liquor Committee Update Councilmember Garfunkel reported on a meeting held with the Tonka Bay Liquor Committee, represented by City Administrator Rob Rys, regarding plans for remaining in partnership with the City for operations of a municipal liquor store. He explained, while this issue had not been formally agreed upon, Shorewood held a strong commitment to retain a presence in the area regarding the sale of liquor. 4. Smithtown Road Engineer Brown requested this item be moved to the Work Session Agenda for discussion, as there was a scheduling conflict for the March 21,2002, Public Meeting regarding this matter. Without objection from Council, this matter was moved to the Work Session Agenda for this evening as Item 6. S. Report on the Joint Public Safety Facility Administrator Dawson reported all Councils, with the exception ofTonka Bay, had taken action regarding moving forward with the plans for the Joint Public Safety Facility at 24140 Smithtown Road. He noted this matter was sla~d for the February 12, 2002, Tonka Bay City Council Meeting. CITY COUNCn. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 11,2002 Page 6 of6 '. t 6. Report on Land Use Regulation Voting Requirements (This item was moved from Item 5 on this evening's City Council Work Session Agenda.) Attorney Keane reported an opinion had been solicited from the State's Attorney General's office regarding previous legislation allowing cities to reduce voting requirements from approval by a super majority to approval by a simple majority when considering land use regulations. He recommended the City's ordinances be updated to reflect the outcome of this opinion. Council directed staff to prepare such resolutions and ordinances. B. Mayor & City Council Administrator Dawson noted there would be a Community Visioning Workshop Thursday, February 21, 2002, at the Southshore Community Senior Center. Mayor Love recessed the meeting to Executive Session to discuss ongoing litigation at 8:04 P.M. C Executive Session . Mayor Love convened the Executive Session at 8:16 P.M. Mayor Love, Councilmembers, Garfunkel, Lizee and Turgeon, Administrator Dawson, Attorney Keane, Engineer Brown, Finance Director Burton, and Planning Director Nielsen were in attendance. Council held a discussion with the City Attorney regarding ongoing litigation. Garfunkel moved, Lizee seconded, to close the Executive Session and return to the Regular Session ofthe City Council Meeting at 8:22 P.M. Motio~ passed 4/0. Mayor Love reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:22 P.M. 10. ADJOURN Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of February 11,2002, at 8:22 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. . RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary Woody Love, Mayor Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2002 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8:00 p.m. or immediately following Regular Meeting MINUTES DRAfT 1. CONVENE WORK SESSION MEETING Mayor Love convened the meeting at 8:27 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, and Turgeon; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; and Planning Director Nielsen; and Deputy Clerk Panchyshyn Absent: Councilmember Zerby B. Review Agenda Mayor Love reviewed the Agenda. Without objection from Council, Item 5 was removed from this Agenda as it had been moved to the Regular Meeting Agenda as Item 9A6. Engineer Brown stated Item 7, Scheduling a Public Meeting Regarding Smithtown Road Improvements, should be added to this evening's Agenda. Without objection from Council, the meeting moved forward with the revised Agenda. 2. REPORT FROM JEFF FOUST ON LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (LMCC) Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, to continue this report to a future meeting due to the absence of Mr. Foust at this meeting. Motion passed 4/0. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF WARDS Administrator Dawson reviewed the preference of the previous City Council to begin examining the possibility of establishing a ward system of Council representation within the City. He then reviewed the process and options permissible for implementing a ward system within the City at this time. Next, he briefly reviewed preliminary ward maps, noting the geographic requirements in creating wards, as well as information regarding precinct boundaries and municipal primary elections. Attorney Keane stated the process for establishing a ward system required use of the ordinance process. Mayor Love commented it would be important to maintain stability on the Council and solidarity as a community as various issues impacting the South Lake Minnetonka community would be coming to fruition in the next few years. After a brief discussion regarding options pertaining to the ward implementation process, the Council directed Staff to move forward in establishing representation for four wards in staggered election years, and maintaining current election practices. Further discussion of this matter would also be taking place at later meetings when full Council could be present. A Public Hearing related to this issue was tentatively scheduled for April 8, 2002. -#;</3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES February 11, 2002 Page 2 ofl 4. GOALS AND PRIORITIES Mayor Love turned the meeting over to Acting Mayor Garfunkel at 8:58 P.M. Acting Mayor Garfunkel recessed the meeting at 8:58 P.M. Attorney Keane left the meeting at 8:59 P.M. Mayor Love returned in his mayoral role and reconvened the meeting at 9:03 P.M. Administrator Dawson praised the Council for its accomplishment of goals over the past year. Mayor Love stated it would make sense to try to work with other communities with various goals and projects over the next year. 5. REPORT ON LAND USE REGULATION VOTING REQUIREMENTS This item had been removed from this Agenda and moved to Item 9A6 on the Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for this evening. . 6. REPORT ON LAKE LINDEN SHORELAND STATUS Director Nielsen explained Lake Linden had inadvertently been placed on a list of lakes in the area by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in the early 1970's. As a result of property being developed at Shorewood Village Shopping Center, questions began to arise as the Shoreland status of various properties in the area. He was notified by the DNR that Lake Linden could remain on the list of lakes within the area; however, the DNR would not be able to support this designation in a court of law if need be. 7. SCHEDULING OF A PUBLIC MEETING REGARDING SMITHTOWN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Engineer Brown noted the previously scheduled date for this meeting conflicted with other obligations for Staff. This meeting was rescheduled for Thursday, April 4, 2002, at the Southshore Community Senior Center from 5:00 P.M. -7:30 P.M. . 8. ADJOURN Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, adjourning the Work Session Meeting of February 11, 2002, at 9:17 P.M. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us.cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM Date: To: . From: cc: Re: . February 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council (" Bonnie Burton, Finance Director Y Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~ Claims and bills scheduled for payment The City's computer network and related software, including the City's financial software package, has been out of operation this week due to hardware problems. The 2002 budget included an allocation for the purchase of a new server and staff is working hard to get a new system in place as soon as possible. In the meantime, however, certain financial functions are unavailable to us, including processing checks for vendor payments. Therefore, we have prepared for council review a list of pay abies for which advance approval for payment is requested. These items will be processed for payment when the new network is installed, which should be in a week to ten days. . Thank you for your understanding. #' ~4 .... ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Prepared by: Reviewed By: Approved By: PAYABLESAPPROVALS For 2/25/02 Council Meeting (!(rIAw~ C1k ~~ Date: Date: . ;) -~/-();,), ~jt- Date: 02. l}.Ol.. . CITY OF SHOREWOOD Check Approval List for 2/25/02 Council Meeting Check # Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount Prepaid Bills: 32209 Advanced Imaging Solutions Feb Contract 02/14/02 6212 $150.00 32210 Afscme Council 14 Feb Union Dues/Dental Prem 02/14/02 $450.94 32211 Anchor Paper Company Copier/newsletter paper 02/14/02 136448901 $245.47 32212 Anderson, Kristi 1st half Feb Svcs 02/14/02 $120.00 32213 Browning Ferris Ind Feb Svc 02/14/02 01002-0200 $50.24 32214 Donald Salverda & Associates Reg fee for Effect Mgmt Class 02/14/02 P-9201-12 $822.43 32215 Eischens, James Exp rept-Iiq store shelving 02/14/02 $108.99 32216 Friends of Southshore Sr Ctr room rental-CUB mtg 02/14/02 $50.00 32217 G&K Services PW Uniforms 02/14/02 $559.04 . 32218 Hennepin County Treasurer 2001 Taxes Pyble file to WSB 02/14/02 $200.00 32219 Hermel Wholesale Cigarettes/paper bags 02/14/02 336235/206 $660.78 32220 Honeywell Alarm monitoring 02/14/02 1769HB769 $178.92 32221 ICMA Retirement Trust-457 2/12/02 Payroll deductions 02/14/02 302131-021202 $1,308.17 32222 MAMA 2002 Membership Dues 02/14/02 224 $45.00 32223 Marlin's Trucking 02/14/02 $435.60 32224 Metro Sales Inc Priport Ink 02/14/02 30152A $108.63 32225 Midwest Coca Cola Bottling 02/14/02 $322.46 32226 Mn Child Support Pmt Ctr Child Support - C Schmid 02/14/02 $173.51 32227 MN Sun Publications Shorewood Village 02114/02 483517 $46.47 32228 Paws, Claws & Hooves Jan 2002 impounds/boarding 02/14/02 $616.64 32229 Pazandak,Joseph Mileage/expense 1/27 - 2/9/02 02/14/02 $133.71 32230 VOID VOID $0.00 32231 Quality Wine & Spirits Wine/Liquor 02/14/02 $8,590.71 32232 Sun Patriot Newspapers Inc Comp Plan Amend-Cub Foods 02/14/02 924 $37.81 32233 Swandby, Donald Jan '02 Expenses/mileage 02/14/02 $207.43 . 32234 Thorpe Distributing Company beer 02/14/02 $1,799.00 32235 Waste Management Feb Svc 02/14/02 0244485-1593 $68.60 32236 PERA 2112/02 Payroll deductions 02/14/02 $4,408.18 32237 Kinko's print city address book 02115/02 $388.78 Total Prepaid Bills $22,287.51 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Check Approval List for 2/25/02. Council Meeting Check * Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice * Amount Bills to be Paid: All Saints Beer $572.50 Bellboy Bar Supply Liquor $86.26 Bellboy Corporation Liquor $6,872.16 Berry Coffee Company coffee $44.00 Culligan water for city hall 11203 $24.55 Day Distributing Company Beer $5,541.42 Direct Safety Company Resp Masks/Gloves 115356 $131.79 East Side Beverage Co Beer $9,814.00 Edina Couriers LLC Pkg to WSB 1319 $:. Fortis Short-term disability-Mar Prem Friends of South shore Sr Ctr room rentals $100.00 Grape Beginnings Inc Wine $1,035.00 Griggs, Cooper & Company Wine/Liquor $11,320.43 H&H Industrial light bulbs for liquor stores 261467 $346.49 Hawkins Water Treatment Container Demurrage DM70136 $80.00 Hermel Wholesale Cigarettes/paper bags 338564 $643.52 Johnson Brothers Liquor Co Wine/Liquor $14,285.55 Lake Mtka Conservation Dist 1 st Qtr Levy Pymt $6,579.30 Lakeshore Weekly News Liquor ADS 87629 $507.50 Larkin, Hoffman, Daly December 2001 Legal fees $4,598.80 League of Mn Cities Directories of Mn Cities $354.32 Leef rugs for TB Liquor 630610 $29.44 Lube-tech Oil/gear lubricants 814541 $867.04 Mark VII Beer $9,319.40 Medica Mar '02 Health Prem $10,66. Metro West Inspection Svcs Jan 2002 Bldg Insp Svcs $66 Metropolitan Council March Wastewater 733653 $27,966.10 Minn NCPERS Group Life Mar '02 Prem $12.00 Munitech March Service 7832 $8,500.00 North Star Ice ice $144.96 Office Depot Office supplies $461.59 Ohlin Sales Inc Laptop battery 94266 $133.44 Orono, City of Fish Philosophy Seminar $25.00 Paustis & Sons Wine $1,828.00 Pepsi $116.18 Phillips Wine & Spirits Wine/Liquor $10,080.24 Potts, Kenneth Jan 2002 Prosecutions $1,608.33 Quality Wine & Spirits Wine/Liquor $3,953.47 Qwest phone svc $410.88 Sam's Club Liquor Stores supplies $235.99 Thorpe Distributing Company Beer $15,441.55 Tierney Brothers Inc labeling tape 408651-1 $188.06 CITY OF SHOREWOOD Check Approval List for 2/25/02 Council Meeting Check It Vendor Name Description Check Date Invoice It Amount Twin City Water Clinic Unum Wine Merchants Xcel Energy Bacteria analysis for Jan '02 Long-term disability-Mar Prem Wine Electric Svc 8350 $60.00 $263.42 $709.50 $6,136.72 Grand Total all Bllls $162,862.66 $185,150.17 Total Bills to be Paid . . PAYROLL APPROVALS For 2/25/02 Council Meeting . I) . - ~ preparedby:-1!~ l.~ Reviewed By: ~~ Date: ;2-~/-o~ Date: ~/;iz- Approved By: Date: 02.~J.O~ . Payroll Register Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 1394 BAILEY BOYD C 1,210.07 2/12/02 1395 BURTON BONNIE M 1,847.57 2/12/02 1396 DA VIS CHARLES S 1,052.89 2/12/02 1397 EISCHENS JAMES E 820.30 2/12/02 1398 ELKE CATHERINE M 752.10 2/12/02 1399 FASCHING PATRICIA L 791.40 2/12/02 1400 GROUT TWILA R 955.89 2/12/02 1401 HELLING PAMELA J 319.82 2/12/02 1402 JOHNSON DENNIS D 1,061.28 2/12/02 1403 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,165.58 2/12/02 1404 MASON BRADLEY J 1,051.72 2/12/02 1405 MOORE JULIE K 257.62 2/12/02 1406 MOTTER BROOKE A 575.82 2/12/02 . 1407 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,013.20 2/12/02 1408 P ANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,048.83 2/12/02 1409 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,416.91 2/12/02 1410 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,159.39 2/12/02 1411 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 607.50 2/12/02 1412 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 991.52 2/12/02 1413 STARK BRUCE H 938.12 2/12/02 1414 SWANDBY DONALD R 1,166.53 2/12/02 1415 TOWER TERRY R 894.16 2/12/02 1416 ZAVADA MITCHELL C 775.70 2/12/02 217113 AMACHER GERRIT P 54.10 2/12/02 217114 ANDERSON PETER T 152.29 2/12/02 217115 ARNST CA TIE E 134.96 2/12/02 . 217116 BAKER RICHARD M 64.23 2/12/02 217117 BEDDOR ANDREW M 45.71 2/12/02 217118 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,864.12 2/12/02 217119 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,605.20 2/12/02 217120 DUFFY DAVID C 241.98 2/12/02 217121 GIESEN JON L 121.10 2/12/02 217122 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 858.89 2/12/02 217123 HELGESEN PERRY M 71.28 2/12/02 217124 HIRSCH DANA M 117.93 2/12/02 217125 JENSEN ANDERS C 121.10 2/12/02 217126 LA TTERNER SUSAN M 437.75 2/12/02 217127 LAUGHLIN BRANDON M 128.03 2/12/02 217128 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 2/12/02 217129 PETERSON MICHAEL D 101.42 2/12/02 217130 PLATHE CRAIG V 259.53 2/12/02 Tuesday, February 12, 2002 Page 1 of2 Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 217131 SCHMIDT JOHN A 132.98 2/12/02 217132 SKJERVOLD ANDREW J 124.56 2/12/02 217133 STANLEY DAVID W 159.22 2/12/02 217134 STANLEY NATHAN B 121.10 2/12/02 217135 THURSTON DOROTHY M 103.12 2/12/02 217136 WANNINGER NICHOLE C 265.55 2/12/02 217137 WILSON DANIEL P 45.71 2/12/02 Total of Checks $29,245.88 Tuesday, February 12,2002 Page 2 of2 . . r ,. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 21 February 2002 RE: Street Light Request - Glen Road/County Rd. 19 FIT..E NO. Streets - Glen Road Residents of Gideon Woods have requested that the City authorize a street light at the intersection of Glen Road and County Road 19 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). A previous request for this intersection was approved but never implemented due to cost associated with placing the light on the west side of the street. The Excel representative indicates that a light can be installed on the east side ofthe road at no charge to the City. As you are aware, the Planning Commission is working on a corridor plan for County Road 19 from the LRT Trail east to the ShorewoodlExcelsior boundary. One of the elements that will be addressed is street lighting. The Commission has agreed with a concept recommended by staff that there be certain unifying "streetscape" elements along that corridor, including landscaping, signage and lighting. The LCEC has also agreed with the concept. Since this vicinity will be somewhat of a civic center for the South Lake area, it has been recommended that something other than the standard Cobra or shoebox light be installed along County Road 19. Exhibit B is an example of a fixture that has been used in the area of the Gray's Bay bridge. Not only is this fixture very decorative, it has a downcast design similar to the shoebox style of light. It is recommended that the location of the light be approved, but that it not be installed until a decision is made on the style of lights that will be used along County Road 19. This issue should be resolved within the next 30 to 45 days. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior to Monday night's meeting. Cc: Craig Dawson Larry Brown Nancy Clegg ~ ,3B ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 0 G) .A m z OJ ....... 0 0 "T1 CD ~ ~ -'" OJ o o z}:> ~ -" ~ -t- )> ",. J . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-B927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us . NOTICE The Shorewood City Council hereby notifies all property owners within 500 feet of the intersection of County Road 19 and Glen Road (see site location map on reverse side) that the Council will consider a request for a street light at that location during their meeting on 25 February 2002 in the Council Chambers of Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road. The meeting starts at 7 :00 P.M. . You are invited to attend this meeting to express your opinions and concerns. If you can not attend the meetip.g, you may respond in writing to: Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 FAX # (952) 474-0128 If you have any questions relative to this matter, you may call City RaHat (952) 474-3236. n t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ~ I NSP Property Tax. Dept 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 .. Hanus Enterprises LLP 15801 West Oaks Minnetonka, MN 55345 Shorewood Oaks Partnership 3055 Casco Point Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 Lake Fellowship of Unitarians Box 54 Excelsior, MN 55331 Resident 5525 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 24600 Glen Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 . Manitou Woods LLC 13400 15th Ave N. #B Plymouth, MN 55441 Resident 5515 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5440 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Metro Recreation Inc 5601 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Resident 5505 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5450 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Marian B. Mason 1014 Mainstreet #200 Hopkins, MN 55343 Resident 5495 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5470 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 . Resident 5535 Gideons Lane. Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5485 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5480 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5455 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5475 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5500 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5445 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5465 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Resident 5510 Gideons Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 . Ft:B-1Z.2802,:. 14;25 L.l.M srus - rv:u; 9S29956S65 F> .92/83 L\..I'IR SIlL.ES - I'IPI.S ~565 P..03"'B3 - LI f ! ! i . I. 'r! ~ I '., . II ..1 ~;J~ ; u . t,. I ,: : i j ~ H' . f i- - i~l. ~C ft. . . ....0 ~ ~=l3. if I ;J . .. - " ;, j ~ i 11 1 61111 ... ! <. ill Ir. ~. iiI: !. .... .~ ..I " S ... ., .. .1 i - : I I I:l'p it "~ " r: ;, Ii '" .; .. .~ . I, :I'~ ~:. = .~ 8 Ii ;:; I It ~ . * 4( I J I ~. ;: . . ,. . r - - rt I j .-) I . , ~. ," 4..-. .... ",r -'-- '_.- ~~~lllll ~ I I ; ~--L II ~ -- ... I III ,j Rete i ved Time Feb. 12. 3:20PM , ( em III FIXILIE ",.."0. ;'e NAMlT;rw:. 3: 20PK - ... ... - ... -- ~ . . l CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: City Council Department . Directors Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ex) February 21, 2002 FROM: . DATE: SUBJECT: Goals and Priorities for 2002 Council reviewed a draft of goals and priorities for 2002 at a work session on February 11. Council concurred with the list developed by staff and commissions, and requested that one item be added (a planning workshop for Lake-area planning commissioners, councils, and staff). Council identified two priorities - establishment of wards for City Council, which must be done by April 30; and development of an organization-wide staff performance assessment process, by April 1. . The list of goals and priorities is a work program for 2002. Undoubtedly, things will change through the year, such that items identified may take lesser importance and other items-some not yet identified-will become more important. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the 2002 Goals and Priorities. ::tt3G ft \..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER r CITY OF SHOREWOOD 2002 Goals and Priorities February 25, 2002 City Council 1) Determine whether, or how to continue function of, LCEC (set to sunset 06.30.02) 2) Review fund-raising performance of Shorewood Parks Foundation toward year-end 2002, and evaluate whether to provide on-going staff support to the Foundation. City Council/Administration 2) Establish wards (adopt ordinance by April 30) [Priority item) 3) Construction/Financing of Public Safety Facilities (EDA) 4) Non-phosphorus lawn fertilizer legislation 5) Complete community visioning process; develop action planes) . Administration 6) Have new organization-wide performance assessment process ready for implementation by April 1 , 2002 [Priority Item] 7) Update position descriptions and evaluation criteria, particularly of department directors 8) Update/replace personnel policy 9) Research & determine direction re: opt-out transit service 10) Update communications plan & component parts (e.g., newsletter, website) 11) Accomplish one-half of recodification 12) Do space needs study for City administrative offices . 13) Continue to explore opportunities for multi-city collaboratives using municipal employees in service delivery AdministrationlFinance 14) Relocate Tonka Bay liquor store; and extend Shorewood Plaza store lease beyond 2002 15) Develop contingencies to respond to City revenue reductions due to State budget shortfall Finance 16) GASB 34 (continue progress toward required implementation date of Jan. 1,2004) 17) Determine whether to change employee-benefit insurance providers 18) Review, purchase, and convert accounting system software ~ ,,- . ~ Q ~ U .- - .Q = ~ u .: = = .- ~ l-< o ] t o t: ..... 0 g 00 l+-<~ .... l-< ..... 0 o ~ .gft) ::s s::: ..ol+-< M 0 O~ o 0 ~ S c2 8 ,-., cd l-< - o A <'::s caca ~& ,-., ,-., 0\ 0 -~ ~ 100 Q ~ U .- - .Q = =-- ~ ,,8 l-< cd 5 ~ cd ..g t) ~ .0 00 t'<:I 0] 0\ ""Cl..o :; ~ ,-., M ~ o~o U .....00 ~ asO~ "g ,,=~l-< o cd - c2 p:: t >. 00 - 0 o rn ::s .;:l ~ ~.....:.=: S ~ >..... ;;o<cd A..o 'Ei l+-<""Cl >. o -S.t:: o ~gu p:: . ... A l+-< s::: ~ ><: 0 o AOo a cd 1::;~ ....", t)ot:_s::: !:< s::: A 0 "'" 0 ~~ oeoo~.;:l o~~~s:::~ $3 s::: 0 0 "S.9 ::s t'- (/) 00~""Cl~,,8 ~>. ..g ~ 0 .... I cd""Cl ;.~ .5 .5 "5 S.5 ~ ~ '-'.....~ooSo-Eh..... rn s::: 0 0 0 ......... as g6S~Ut)=:C:lfj oooo..o~cdl+-<O 00 _ -.=: I ~ ~ 0.... .... A ..... s::: .... "t: oSS~e:-o""~ 00 .... ..... 0""Cl t) . 9 0 ~ I I So~t>g. . _ ..... ..... 0""Cl t) 0 cd t) t) 00.- 0 ~ s::: .t; 0.0 cd >.t:: 0 0 o .0' 8' ~ 8 S ~ .;J > ~ A S A ~.... ~ "OO\~~.8~<<Ig oo-o~o!:<>.o B~p:: A.....~ t) ~ ~cCZ~g~5~~ A "-- 0..0 00.... ~- ..... ~ ~ as o.t:: 0"'" cd A s::: +J o.~ 00 l-< > o ::s.... t) t: ~ A G? ~8Jj~~~.EC2 ,-......~..-.....~ ,,-....~..-..... -~M"'" V"l1.Ot'- ~~~~ ~~~ ~ .: .... .: .: = - ~ ~ 100 Q ~ U .... - .Q = =-- ..... o s::: ~ ~ ;eo.. ~.S t I <<It) ~ .g., l+-< 8 o A o < rn "E o S o 00 cd rn o "'" s::: 0 o s::: .... 0 <<I . ;J t: . ;!3 o S ~ S o 0 t) t) o :-;::: 00 00 t)S::: ~ S.... S 0 ~ ~ ~ 0.. "" 0 cd 3 ~ ~ '2 Bb .1:: ~ o .t::. cd .'t; S ~ ~ ~~ ~ ]]. Q ~ <: s:::.5 ;:;-,.5 o. '-' ....... .;:l ~ A g. t)8 c::!~ ~ 5h S 00 00 u~ c: t) "'" l+-< 0 ~ 0 A~ 0 ~ A;g ca 00 0 cd q;;< s::: g <. ~ AU 0_ ~.~ 0 ~ N ,:l., );> ~ '-"...... o ~ ""Cl ca ""Cl <<I e!l 0 c: S:::"O OOCl~~=:C: ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., o-~ M"'" MMM MM ~ ..... 00 ""Cl ~ rn - .~ o U = Q .- 00 .f!! S S Q U ~ = .a = = - =-- 00 ~ - ,:l., cd ~ 1:) o .5 t) 00 0 ~.... t) s::: Cl ~ .... 00 s::: "E.5 s::: ~ o E.9 0 s:::~t) 0- 0 >. .... ,:l.,:::1 s::: ~ .;!3 l+-< 0 0 ;> 00 > 0 t)..o t..!. s::: ;e ~ 0 as 0.... "8 oc.S t:i=:g 00 (/) .~ 0 ~ 00,,8.5 ~ l-<; e.1:: 0 :g o 0 0 A o::c 0 s:::t)Nt)t)cd~ - .;::! .... -""Cl l-< o..A8~Al-<0 o S 00 ti E ~o .8 ""Cl 0 ""'.- 0 0 <:uo=:c:u (/) ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., ,-., -~M""'V"lI.Ot'- . = Q .- 00 00 .- S S Q U ~ 100 = =-- ~ - ,:l., ~ . ... 00 s::: ..8 e S- o u .s l+-< o ~ A ~ ~ 00 -s::: ~ ,:l.,.... tI:S o "S ,:l., <. ~ . ... as ""Cl ..... "O"E::s""Cli:l:l ~ocaJ;.I.l"", E><<I..... 00 0 0 0 ~ ~;.; ~ ~ t)c:t':IOOO 8 i:l:l ~..o.S::: AE~~:.g ~ ~.t: 8. ~ ~~Cloe: "",As::: s::: 0 -S ~..g.9 s::: 00 (,j:j s::: ~.9 ~ 00.... 0 <<I ~~~t)_ t)oS:::ca ~8~8ti ,:l., A~ .s .5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~l~~~ 0~020 u~u~u ..-.....,.-.......-...~..-... -~M""'..... CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 2002 CC: Mayor and City Council Members Jean Panchyshyn, Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk~ Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk.ct> Tobacco License TO: . FROM: RE: . This Resolution issues a tobacco license for the sale of tobacco products at the Hilltop Restaurant in Shorewood. This is a first-time request for a tobacco license for this establishment. The , applicant wishes to install a remote control operated cigarette vending machine, which will be operated only by the employees. The Hilltop Restaurant has completed the application requirements. A background check was completed, and there were no violations relating to tobacco products. If council has any questions or would like to review the application materials, contact Jean. As the applicant has met the licensing requirements, staff recommends approval of the Resolution issuing a license to the Hilltop Restaurant to sell tobacco products. Council Action: Approval of a Resolution issuing a license to the Hilltop Restaurant to sell tobacco products. 1t-3D ft . ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSE TO RETAILER TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS WHEREAS, the ShorewoodCity Code, Section 302 provides for the licensing of the sale of tobacco products in the City; and WHEREAS, said Code provides that an applicant shall complete an application, and shall pay a licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed an application and paid the appropriate fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood as follows: . That a License for the sale oftobacco products be issued for a term of one year, from November 1, 2001 to October 31, 2002 consistent with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 302 of the Shorewood City Code, to the following applicant: Applicant Address Hilltop Restaurant 272 Water Street ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood this 25th day of February, 2002. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR . ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City COWlcil Shorewood Parks FOWldation February 21,2002 Nominations to Board of Directors . The by-laws of the Shorewood Parks Foundation provide that the Board of Directors nominates candidates to serve on the Board, and that the City COWlcil affirms the appointments. With the reorganization of the F oWldation that occurred in 2001, the Council approved a staggered schedule of terms for board members. The Board may have seven to nine members (including the Parks Commission Representative). The following persons have terms expiring on February 28, 2002: Bill Keeler, Bob Noren, and Tad Shaw. Mr. Keeler has stated interest in reappointment to a three-year term. Kate Lynch Bix has served as the Parks Commission representative to the Board during the past year. As she is no longer on the Parks Commission, she is not on the Board currently. She has expressed interest in appointment to a three-year term. . . The Board would welcome the return of current member Bill Keeler and former member Kate Lynch Bix. Accordingly, the Board nominates Bill Keeler and Kate Lynch Bix to serve as directors through February 28.2005. If the COWlcil affirms these appointments, there will be vacancies for one to three positions on the Board of Directors. The Park Commission will consider the naming of its representative at an upcoming meeting; with this appointment, the Board will have its seven-member minimum. There remains a vacancy for a three-year position and a one-year position, as Roxanne Martin, whose term expires February 28,2003, has resigned to recent changes in the demands in her schedule. 43E #" t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING DR fT Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Chair Arnst; Commissioners Meyer, Bartlett, Puzak, Callies, Young and Palesch; City Administrator Dawson; City Engineer Brown; and City Council Liaison Lizee B. Review Agenda Chair Arnst moved item #6; discussion regarding the Minnetonka Community Education Services proposal, before Reports, item #4, due to Commissioner Callies need to leave early. Meyer moved, Puzak seconded, approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 7/0. C. Introduction of New Members Chair Arnst welcomed new Commissioners Bartlett and Palesch. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTE A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of January 8, 2002 Puzak moved, Callies seconded, approving the Minutes of January 8, 2002, as submitted. Motion passed 7/0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none. 4. DISCUSSION REGARDING MINNETONKA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES PROPOSAL Chair Arnst took a moment to review the history between MCES and the City of Shorewood for the new Commissioners. She pointed out that, as promised by MCES, a proposal was to have been given to the City by January 21,2002, for review. The date was revised until February 1,2002, with no avail. There still is no proposal on the table from MCES to date. Administrator Dawson interjected that the Community Education Director is out of the country until late next week and wouldn't have a proposal to submit until then. Lizee stated that the City Council recommended MCES be allowed to submit its proposal by the close of work Tuesday of next week. Chair Arnst cautioned that timeline constraints would mean that the Park Commission would not see the proposal as a Commission until February 26 and the Council until March 11. She stated her concern over the availability of a back up plan. If the Commission does not approve the proposal at that late date, what are the itfclr [ ramifications, is there a plan B. Chair Arnst reiterated the need to have a Plan B in position. She questioned if Plan B would suggest that staff and Engineer Brown take responsibility in house, either by hiring a director, which is outside the budget, or carry the burden themselves. Callies asked if the proposal they await from MCES includes more than scheduling. puzak maintained that according to his recollection, the Commission already agreed to have MCES continue as it had done in the past this year. Meyer did not recall that an agreement had been reached over MCES doing the scheduling. Chair Arnst questioned whether staff could handle the added responsibility of the scheduling piece only. Brown replied that if it is a directive by the Commission and Council that staff does so they will have to try. He maintained that the added responsibility is more than merely shuffling around the scheduling. Callies asked if it was realistic to require Brown or the Park Secretary, Twila Grout, to take on even more responsibility than they have now. Brown repeated that it would be a vast challenge for staff and require a large commitment, especially the first year, but it could be possible. Meyer asked what added responsibilities would be required of staff. Brown replied that other than scheduling, the added duties would include the collection of insurance forms, communication accountability, user fee collection, the new memorandum agreement, and some special event coordination. These things were originally intended to flow through MCES. . Lizee, once again, asked the question who do we want managing our parks, MCES, who has not even expressed interest, and who has not lived up to our expectations, by clearly mismanaging our parks in the past or do we enable our Park Commission to determine the alternatives. Palesch wondered ifMCES was paid for its services, and ifnot, she commented one gets what they pay for. Dawson mentioned that up until the past two years the City paid $3,500 annually to MCES for its services. Over the last two years, however, MCES has declined payment. Callies suggested that the Park Commission looks at other options, contacts other Cities to find out what they have done and make suggestions for down the road. Callies moved, Puzak seconded, that the City continue with MCES' basic scheduling services this year and investigate other avenues or create a plan of how to manage the Park system for next year. . Palesch added that she believed the Commission should certainly look elsewhere. As a new Commissioner, and having reviewed many recent Minutes, she found it apparent that MCES does not want to do what the City is asking. Chair Arnst stated that the Park Commission has been aware of this problem for a long time and as stewards of the park, have discussed the MCES issues at every meeting over the past year. In her opinion, process has been followed as much as possible, always resulting in the same conclusion, which is that MCES is not responding to our needs, they did not even submit a proposal in a timely manner even after we invited them to. Chair Arnst declared that the City has been remiss, the citizens look to them to provide a pleasant and manageable experience and we've not done so. To go another year with MCES, puts staff in a compromising position. There have been problems with staff trying to manage the scheduling and MCES, and Chair Arnst was extremely disappointed that this relationship should continue. Meyer reiterated that, over the past year, many meetings have taken place with MCES that have revealed their , i . . lack of interest. Callies agreed, however, stated she saw no other real alternatives for this year and felt further investigation resulting in recommendations for 2003 was necessary. puzak suggested putting a time limit of making recommendations to the Council by October. Chair Arnst called for a vote with an amendment to have recommendations by August. Dawson suggested that if potential budget implications would be tied to the recommendations these would need to accompany the proposed budget going to Council in mid to late July. Meyer amended the motion to have recommendations for Council by July Ist, 2002. Puzak seconded. Motion passed 4/3, with Palesch, Meyer and Chair Arnst dissenting. Callies left the meeting at 8:03 P.M. 5. REPORTS A. Report on City Council Meetings of January 14th, January 28th, 2002 and February 11, 2002 Brown reported that there was a resolution adopting the 2002 User Fee Schedule and a Resolution accepting the final improvements for the sewer and water project through Freeman Park. He pointed out that the project is nearly completed. The City Subdivision Ordinance draft was examined and passed at the subsequent meeting. Dawson added that there was an amendment to the Lawn Fertilizer Ordinance which moved the compliance dates back until next year. With that, Dawson expects great support in the Senate environment committee meeting later this week. Brown concluded the January 14th report with news that the Lake Linden Drive feasibility report was adopted. In regard to Parks, Brown reported that the January 28th City Council Meeting focused on the hardcover limitations being examined by the Planning Commission. It also addressed the public safety site at 24140 Smithtown Road, immediately East of the public works facility, in which there was a comp plan amendment modifying the site from a low to medium residential site to a Public Purpose site. The EDA, Economic Development Authority, has been focused on giving the Cities the ability to finance that facility. Brown stated that at the February 11th meeting, Ted Shaw was appointed the MCES advisory board representative, spring clean-up day was discussed, and finally, approval was given to the fmal draft of the Subdivision ordinance. Dawson reported that the City ofTonka Bay was voting this evening whether to include the police department at the public safety site. The hope is that the conditional use permit will come up on the April or May agenda with some sort of ground breaking ceremony in late summer. The City Council also discussed establishing a ward system during its work session yesterday. The system would be staggered and instituted over the next few years. Dawson continued, adding that the Council looked at a draft list of priorities, which will likely be accepted at the next City Council Meeting and forwarded to the Commissions after that. Finally, Dawson invited the Commissioners to attend the Community Visioning Process Public Workshop, next Thursday February 21st from 7 - 8:30 P.M. at the South Shore Center. Chair Arnst had one final question regarding the City Council Meeting of February 11th. She asked what the Council's rationale was for giving MCES an additional five days to submit their proposal at this point. Lizee replied that while she did not agree that there was a rationale for it, the position of the Council was to give MCES some leniency to get the report in. Dawson inteIjected that comments made last evening in support of standard or fair business practices dictate that notification be given and an opportunity for remedy be offered, i.e. five days. 6. DISCUSSION OF PARK MANAGEMENT & PLANNING " I \ A. Review Freeman Park Field Inventory and Parking Study Without reviewing the entire proposal, Brown stated that the report pinpointed the problems at Freeman Park and offered several recommendations. The question of overuse versus the shortage of parking was addressed within the report. Brown agreed with the observation on page 5, that the concurrent use of all facilities creates a demand for parking that exceeds original expectations. The existing supply of314 spaces will accommodate all of the facilities at a one space per participant standard assuming a reduction for youth activity. If managed correctly there should be enough parking. Brown went on to share the standards from surrounding communities. Brown then shared with the new members the State of Minnesota's requirement that the Freeman Park access to Highway 7 be closed. Through the State's cooperative agreement program, the City would be compensated approximately $52,000 for the closure and construction of the new parking lot. .As of late, however, Brown pointed out that the Watershed District and the City have been in a debate over the necessity for ponding, which will treat the water running off the new parking lot. If they do not come to an agreement by July, the City may lose the money from the state. As displayed by the Koegler report, a solution to manage the parks, . which includes the new parking lot, will need to be realized by July or we lose the state dollars. Meyer questioned, now that we've voted to use MCES, who will implement the recommendations. Are we going to rely on them to implement the IS-minute staggered start time. Puzak viewed the July deadline as a high priority. He believed the potential loss of $50,000 was of great importance and wanted to see much effort put into solving the engineering issues that exist. Brown assured him that he and the Mayor are spending a great deal of time on this matter. Palesch moved, Young seconded, to implement the four recommendations in the Koegler report as soon as possible. Palesch withdrew this motion and amended it to read as follows. Palesch moved, Meyer seconded, that the Commission recommend to Council that they direct staff to communicate to MCES the implementation of suggestion number one of the Koegler report for the 2002 season. Motion passed 6/0. . Puzak moved, Palesch seconded, that the Commission ask staff and Council to focus their energy on expanding the overflow parking into lot 4 and negotiate as many spaces that water quality management will allow before the state deadline. Motion passed 6/0. Puzak moved, Palesch seconded, to accept the recommendations of the Koegler Report and keep items 3 and 4 in consideration as we,move forward with the Park Management Process. Motion passed 6/0. B. Review Recommendations on Draft User Policies Brown presented the revised Draft User Policies for consideration. Puzak questioned whether the fine reflected in the policies prevents the City from collecting the damages incurred by people driving on the fields. Brown indicated this would not be an issue and is addressed elsewhere under motor vehicle prosecution. Puzak moved, Meyer seconded, to accept the revised facility use agreement and forward it to City 1 I .t . . Council for implementation. Motion passed 6/0. C. Review Ordinance for Motorized Vehicles Driving on Fields or Green Space Palesch moved, Meyer seconded, to accept the language changes of City Ordinance 801.06 Subd. 3 to raise the fine from $35.00 to S200.00, and Subd. 2 to include both striped and/or posted parking stalls. Motion passed 6/0. D. Review Park Management Matters Memo of January 8, 2002 Chair Arnst presented the Park Management Matters memo and timeline for discussion regarding park scheduling and asked for comment. The general consensus was to add the July 1st deadline. 'E. Discuss Mn Recreation & Park Association Membership Chair Arnst suggested membership to the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association. She indicated that a past park commissioner, Mark Themig, recommended the Agency and asked the Commission to discuss membership. At $250, she believed the program would be a valuable resource to the Commission. Palesch moved, Young seconded, that the Park Commission recommend joining the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association. Motion passed 4/2, with Meyer and Puzak dissenting. F. Discuss Other Ideas 7. DISCUSS/PRIORITIZE PARK COMMISSION GOALS FOR 2002 Chair Arnst, in referring to bullet point two of the Park Goals memo, recommended adding the July 1st deadline once again. Other suggestions included, the completion of the Lake Linden Drive trail investigation, further exploration for concessions at Eddy Station, and the addition of a parking lot at Freeman Park. 8. CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULE OF PARK LIAISONS TO CITY COUNCIL Park liaisons to Council meetings for 2002 were assigned to volunteers as follows: July Bartlett August Young September Callies October Chair Arnst November Meyer December Puzak Both Chair Arnst and Engineer Brown suggested that the new Park Commissioners be given an orientation and consider attending a City Council meeting in advance of their liaison duties in order to observe the reporting process. February March April May June Callies Chair Arnst Meyer puzak Palesch 9. DISCUSS APPOINTMENT OF PARK LIAISON TO PARK FOUNDATION According to Administrator Dawson, a Park Commissioner must serve as one of the Directors to the Park Foundation. With this in mind, Chair Arnst asked for volunteers. As no one volunteered at this time, she asked members to keep it under consideration until the next meeting. (., ~ 10. RECOMMENDATION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 2002 Meyer moved, Palesch seconded, to retain Chair Arnst as the Park Commission Chair Person. Motion passed 5/0/1, with Chair Arnst abstaining. Young moved, Meyer seconded, to retain Vice-Chair Puzak in his current position. Motion passed 5/0/1, with Puzak abstaining. 11. NEW BUSINESS Brown reported that minor damage had occurred at Eddy Station once again this past week, and that the ice at Cathcart had gone bad and been closed. Gordon Lindstrom, a representative from South Tonka Little League was in attendance, and asked when the March meeting with the sports organizations might occur. Chair Arnst could not give him a definitive date until the Park Commissions February 26th meeting in which the agenda and issues for that March meeting would be discussed. She hoped for the second or third week of March, before spring break. . Lindstrom encouraged the Commission to set the date soon, due to the fact that some organizations will have already begun to schedule by then. 12. ADJOURNMENT Bartlett moved, Palesch seconded, adjourning the Regular Park Commission Meeting of February 12,2002 at 9:17 P.M. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson RECORDING SECRETARY . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: . CC: DATE: RE: Mayor and City Council Larry Brown, Director of Public Works Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator February 21, 2002 FACILITY USE AGREEMENT At its February 12,2002 meeting, the Shorewood Park Commission accepted the attached Facility Use Agreement and recommended it be forwarded to the City Council for . approval. . #~8 ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER City of Shorewood' s Facility Use Agreement In an effort to maintain safe conditions for all park patrons and insure that the City facilities are used appropriately, the City of Shorewood has set in place the following regulations for the use of the City's facilities. . Field or rink use will not be allowed until the city has received the player roster, certificate of insurance, memo agreement and user fee. . All Park Ordinances apply and agree to adhere to them. . A City of Shorewood tournament permit and fee shall be submitted to the City a minimum of 15 days prior to the tournament. Tournaments shall not conflict with the other regularly scheduled activities for the facility. . All leagues, associations, or groups using the facilities must provide the City with a single contact that is to serve as the representative for the organization activities. . Games shall be scheduled to provide a 15 minutes break between games or warm-up seSSIOns. . No driving of motorized vehicles is allowed on the fields or green space. Individuals caught driving on the fields will be fined $200.00 for each offense. . . It is the responsibility of the sports organization to clean up after tournaments. If the City performs the cleanup, the sports organization will be charged for the time, materials and labor for this service. . Users of the park are not allowed to make alterations to the facilities or terrain. . Facility improvements that the associations may want to make can only be completed after following appropriate required steps. Using green space outside of the designated fields is not permitted. Disposal of paint cans shall not be done in the facility trash receptacles or on the park site. . . . Failure to follow these regulations will result in suspension of the use of the facilities. . It is the City's desire that all of the patrons who use the park facilities are able to enjoy the park system safely and conveniently. These regulations have been set in place to achieve this goal. By reading and acknowledging that the organization has read the regulations and agree to adhere to them, continues the privilege of utilizing the park system. I hereby certify that I am the primary representative for the league or group desiring use of the City's facilities, and that I have read the above regulations and agree to conduct the activities in accordance to the regulations above. Furthermore, I acknowledge that failure to adhere to these regulations shall result in suspension of use of the facilities for a 1 year period. Name Representative for what League/Association Contact Number Date ".. . ., ., . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Park Commission Craig Dawson, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~ February 8, 2002 FROM: . DATE: RE: Review of Ordinance for Motorized Vehicles Driving on Fields or Green Space During the previous Park Commission meeting conducted on January 8th, the Commission discussed the necessity of revising the City Ordinances to address a penalty for driving outside of designated areas within the parks or green spaces. City Ordinance 801.06 states: 801.06: OPERATION OF VEHICLES IN PARKS OR ON PUBLIC GROUNDS: (Ord 246, 10-28-91; amd Ord 312, 6-24-96) . Subd 1. Operation of Vehicles in Parks or Public Grounds. Except police officers or duly authorized and uniformed snow patrol personnel in the performances of their duties, no person should stop, stand, or park a vehicle or operate any vehicle, or ride any bicycle or horse, except in compliance with the directions of a police officer on any park property or other public grounds within the limits of the City, except when such areas are designated for any of such uses and signs prohibiting any of such uses on any park property or public grounds shall be complied with. J Subd 2. Parking of Vehicles in Parks or on Public Grounds: No person shall park a motor vehicle in parks or on public grounds except in designated parking areas and where parking areas provide for striped parking stalls no person shall park more than one (1) motor vehicle per designated parking stall. For purposes of this section, parking shall not include those attended vehicles stopped in the process of accessing public waters. 1 See also Chapter 902 of this Code. :tt(p~ "II- ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Park Commission Ordinance Revision February 8,2002 Page 2 of2 Subd 3. Violations. Violations of the provisions of this section may be subject to a fine not to exceed $35. 00 and/or towing. Recommendation: Staff is recommending that 801.06, Subd 3 be revised to: Subd. 3. Violations. Violations of the provisions of this section may be subject to afine not to exceed $200.00 and/or towing. . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 801 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO OPERATION OF VEHICLES IN PARKS OR ON PUBLIC GROUNDS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 801.06, Subd. 2 and Subd. 3 oftheShorewood City Code shall be amended to read as follows: Subd. 2 Parking of Vehicles in Parks or on Public Grounds: No person shall park a motor vehicle in parks or on public grounds except in designated parking areas and where parking areas provide for striped and/or posted parking stalls. No person shall park more than one (1) motor vehicle per designated parking stall. For purposes of this section, parking shall not include those attended vehicles stopped in the process of accessing public waters. Subd. 3 Violations. Violations of the provisions of this section may be subject to a fine not to exceed $200.00 and/or towing. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect following its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this 25th day of February, 2002. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION DENYING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST BY DEWEY CARTER WHEREAS, Tradewinds Concepts/Designs, Inc. (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 26330 Noble Road, in the City of Shore wood, County of Hennepin, legally described as: "Lot 1 Block 3, Oak Ridge Estates Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and . WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to build a single-family residential dwelling on the property and has requested a 30-foot variance from the setback requirement imposed by the Shorewood Zoning Code for the zoning district in which the property is located; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's application was reviewed by the Planning Director and his recommendations have been set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council, dated 29 November 2001; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application for a variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission on 4 December 2001, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant requested additional time to revise his plans in order to resolve issues raised at the public hearing, the hearing was continued to 15 January 2002 and again to 5 February 2002; and . WHEREAS, the Applicant failed to submit revised plans or appear at the continued hearing and the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council deny the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 25 February 2002, at which time the Zoning Administrator's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Applicant's property is located in an R-IA Single-Family Residential zoning district, which requires a 50-foot front yard setback, a 50-foot setback on the side yard abutting the Grant Lorenz Road right-of-way, a 10-foot side yard setback on the west side of the lot and a 50-foot rear yard setback. 1I7A 2. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) requires a 35-foot setback from the wetland located on the north half of the property. 3. In order to comply with the MCWD's wetland setback the Applicant proposes build the house 20 feet from the right-of-way of Noble Road, requiring a variance of30 feet from the City's front yard requirement. CONCLUSION 1. That the Applicant has not satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under the Shorewood City Code and has neither established an undue hardship as defined by Minnesota Statutes or attempted to minimize the amount of variance required to build a home on the subject property. 2. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby denies the Applicant's request for a setback variance. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of February, 2002. . WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK . -2- CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 29 November 2001 RE: Carter, Dewey - Setback Variance Request FILE NO.: 405(01.29) BACKGROUND . Mr. Dewey Carter, representing Tradewinds Concepts/Designs, Inc., has requested a setback variance to construct a home on the property at 26330 Noble Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The property is located in the R-1A, Single-Family Residential zoning district and contains approximately 40,240 square feet of area. As shown on Exhibit B, the applicant proposes to locate the house 20 feet from the right-of- way of Nob1e Road - a variance of 30 feet from the required 50-foot front yard setback. As shown on Exhibits C-F, the proposed house is a split entry design with a footprint area of 2250 square feet, of which 724 square feet is occupied by a three-car garage. Nearly one-half of the lot is within a Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) wetland. As a consequence the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requires a 35-foot buffer setback from the wetland. A significant drainageway exists on the easterly 30 feet of the lot. ISSUES! ANALYSIS The Applicant's original plan (see Exhibit G) was submitted in compliance with Shorewood's R-1A zoning regulations. Upon applying for a Watershed District permit, the applicant was advised that they would require a 35-foot wetland setback. This, combined with the City's 50-foot front yard setback requirement render the lot virtually .... toJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum Re: Carter Variance Request 29 November 2001 the rules. While it would be easy for the City to simply say that the MCWD rule is what creates the hardship in this case, the City has an interest in protecting wetlands too. The Watershed District has, in certain instances, accepted lesser setbacks from WCA wetlands, and has indicated that they may be willing to compromise in this case. Before it can be determined what variance(s) would be appropriate, certain issues must be addressed: A. Whatever variance(s) may be granted, they can be substantially reduced through redesign of the house. The proposed garage-forward design does not lend itself to the relatively shallow buildable area of the lot. For example, if the garage were extended from the east end of the house, it would reduce the depth of the building by as much as 18 feet. . B. Given the proximity to the wetland area, soil tests should be provided for the lot. C. The proposed driveway exceeds the maximum driveway width allowed by Shorewood's zoning regulations. This is easily corrected. D. The survey should include the lOO-year flood elevation. The City Engineer may be able to provide this information. Based on this and the soil testing, the plans should be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. E. The only place for a future deck on the proposed plan is on the west side of the house. For this the applicant has allowed 11 feet of space between the house and the side setback line. The house seems to orient toward the neighbor's yard, rather than toward the subject property's own yard area. While this is somewhat a matter of personal taste, an II-foot deck is considered to be fairly minimal. This may be something the applicant wishes to consider in a redesign of the building. . F. There are significant trees on the site. The applicant must submit a tree preservation and reforestation plan. RECOMMENDATION In light of the issues raised herein, it is recommended that the applicant's request be tabled, pending redesign of the building. While some variance may still be necessary, the extent of the variance should be able to be substantially reduced. Cc: Craig Dawson Larry Brown Tim Keane Dewey Carter Mike Wyatt -2- UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA ,k J. ,k '" '" ,\. J. ,k SH PDINTE COURT J. ,\. '" ,k SH POINTE CIRCLE :Jr? ,k ,k 400 I o 400 Feet I ~ N Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Carter - setback variance FOR I. G:.. W. Rondy L. Kur .L.S. No. 20270 Russell 'k1~h<::..I..f'.S. No. 1~1!3 3lo.L,\ '2..0 '0 .0 o :t:.t ~ o VI -IS I I I I '- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY IAlEASUI1EMENrs !iflOIlN IN FEEr AND nFclMALS OF A FOOn .I~TH SWVEOO. K. ~OO2 J:1:FI::rI:;ol~ S I. I'I.E. COlJAdJA IlI';I1l S, fd{ ~~421 16111 700'9169 FAX 16121 700.7602 PROPOSED GI~^I)ES IJA'rE ._~':.~~.:..?'-'- o . 11101-1 MOHUMEN r lJEN~ II-IGS AilE I'EII PLAT .,; . 51' 11<1: SET .:;::. . EX I S I 11010 l:l.EV^ I I UI.' I ). I'IIOPOSr.:IJ i:LEV. (- . lJllA I HAGE AllllOW 9305"" '" S'OT e:.1.E"",Tiot.! ". "" --'T3~ ':.. e:ill.:>Tlto.k:1 cotliolllL "-@-- ""PiWPO~ ~ -; I~ Q _ ._ .___ _ III (J2 . NORTH G^R^GE SL^B . TOP OF ULOCI< . BASEMENT FLOOR <:)41. \ Q4\.4 "l~A.o 4'1'11 "l!"1. C) ":!:>Illl o . 2.0 f====;1::==1 SC^LE 1101 FEEl \-.01" \) \3LO C-.\Z- ~ o ~ \<.. '< \ \;> C::3 Go. G... ~"\ ~ \"IC.... ":::> S G-c..o N't> .A. t> D \ \'" \ 0 \-..l ~ \_\ rn ~ c=..?\ N Co U ~ T'C, ~ \ \o.l N.E.~"T h.-. €....~~\ ' \s<o,S5 1:.....~e.M.<::.~'T~ \;>lZ.b...\..........c..G.. ~ I.>"'T'\'-','( ",. () . .--. 0 /' cf) ( - ( :,;",~:.'/ J" \ . -, ~Q , , ,:>~-r\ ___ - - _ _ _ _ ~\.-I>-,.3.1:> ~..., -< J '- ",. _ ...(1.:' ...... Q .,,", "" ____ ..'=- V" "-c""'\~..... .\_A\:.."" , _\~_ Q_~ ~~ ~_r' ~ ..... <JP'7 ",.. lXll c.co~~~\ """" E..~"\ ""G-"'f~C ...- /\ $-.loGoo a;.'''''~' 1 /~ \ u.s',.3.C':> \ / I 1 I / \ \ I / \ . \ I ~ \:~/ \" 1 I ~ , , , -' - -~.... 1-5 ,1 I U. 'lls.e. ...,"" ....._ ' \ I 0 I.S ""," . ..... \ I ) ... ........-"" "",- -..... q'!ll.............. -- - 4-1 -............., I lQ , " ..... ....... I ~ ~/ ',\ \ i I :\ \ I , .) ~ I . \ ~ "f I \ ~ 0- I ~ '" ~~i~s ~ I I "..J ~;;. ~ "....... \ 12+ I Oc -":'-~~a \'\ ~ \ \ p ~ ............... g] 'k.! I-i 0 I.., I I 8j , ... r'r:l"~S1V I I (I \.?:j. ,': ~~' l-:t I,' ,.. I I I I I .... :J' . :,' I~/~!' I ~ ~ '3 & " ,I ..' I. \! d:t \ ,'1/'/' " J,... o )t 3 ' " I. I M r ~ t ~ I I; el~'/ ",._ I &\ 2 ; 61 ~ I ,%, ("'~( '\1 I cl 1'J~\!l':1 \ 1/1'1' .' I << IJ.. ;> , I' 'I < "... - r:J 3"7 \ I' ~" .:;( II Is.n,;.. U tu 1J / \) II ': l.':' '/ I .. .\ \\~ t ..' . , I, I \ \~\ 'J V 0 \ \.\ , ',.f I. . ....'? \ I-I ... ., ... ~" ~\~~ V \~i=c.?\t~'c.n.r .. 7.....-.... -'" ................................. -,-1~36os'l ........- '\G'D~b. s..?o'~\v-:>~ "-" '..:' ""- 1..0 I ~.,~ '\' :> '1'lP!.'\J -1-1 -~ I},; tJ Q- ~ ~/:).u, G ..: - - -.c.!. !B - . ~( to .(,1 .., \'l.. ,0 ('\~ I. \') 1\0 ,..,:, . 4"';:''1 (' 'T~6"'i', N~b\t. ~~ ).lOBLE. o ~li.\oIC.I"~"''il'(. Il&:..b .,..O~ or- ~1l<"'"01..G.. Ol~'c...\ ~p( Exhibit B PROPERTY SURVEY ~~\71l1:O \o/'L'L\o, .. M,,'(ol[V \>oOU.,.. Fo;r.l.Ql>,;t,~ C.o",,? II-Go 0 ,,-R.OI 'P""'TG:,D \-'2>0-0.\ 'i::i:.\II~IO\.l..!::. 4-I"l...-C \IO\)5~ .,..I'\'(.("t> 1 - t . , , .. . z s;. ~;!. > a W". cd::. ~a 0/: .... Exhibit C BUILDING ELEVATION - FRONT t . OJ ROOF' VENTS AS REQ'D. 2351 ASPHALT SHlNGLES DO BRICI< SCALEt 119. = 1'-0. LEFT SIDE ELEVATION BRICI< SADDLE T SHINGLES CD 0 0 SI~)1NG BRICK BRICK RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE1 liS. = 1'-0' . ROar VENTS 2351 ASPHA'-T SHINGlES [[] [[] [[] BRICK BRICI< OJ OJ IRICK OJ SIDING REAR ELEVATION SCALE. l/S# = 1'-0' Exhibit D BUILDING ELEVATION - REAR AND SIDES .. i ..v ..- cl"1 0; ~fi1 I ,,/ 1=1 1111 . ~ ,,/ ~ ~ III~ ~ 1 'U Z T ... . ~lllt; ~ ~ ~ 5 = ~ ~ ;111 S lli III !:::; 1 ro: B ~ !~r, ~ I ~IIII It:. I ~ ~; clJ ::. N C> ~! ~ ! I N " @o -i€lo N ~i . ~: . ";, \.... ~"" '.-.:0., ~ -, , :-;--. . . " :.- .~ rs -.- - : I . Ii 'w I.. " .;.;. 'S:! .s~.. ;'. ';:.- . . P- I _ 'Jfj .ta 8 ssn~.1. - o - 09;a-t . I ~----- N ~ ssnlI.L 1I31/l11D - ===1--..-------- -- ,--.------- " qp /' ,/ , / " ~ " \- r-- ...8 -_.- ..-- -- - -./ : i- 0::: ? I 1:1 ~ ;a . I ~ W .. I ~ P=l~ I.. 0::: ~' '- I', I D W J ,I )- ~- -~ :- -- _..~~ / ~ \ ' " \ 7 \ r- -- - ~.- a. \ I II X>- I ~ II i I / ~;: i ill I w ~~ ~ II ~ uC> ~ I z" j x ~ =.. 8~1 ~ II :r 0::: N \ ~ llII . '" '" ~ .. ~ I W ~ II \ I ~ II ~ / I ~ / L____ <0 / - io> / ;a / / /' . ,,/ ..- ;a , t a, ~ :@ " .B-,ot , _ :l/O ..,a i S3SS011J. - (\/ '*I: C> I ~ $l~ CJ x CJ . 0::: C\I ~.. '-... W~ ____ p:\ , .9-.n / M2:, / *... ~~-^-/ gxY- Oi: . ~r LU$l P=l " @: i: ~ ~ J . ~ Gl!!1al CI -1" -- ~ ~;1- ~ .e ~>:r~ llII IX :i!3. ~ ~ ;:.. SEat-a I Exhibit E YI\~. FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVEL YIl _II 2 = ~ii !!l .v-,;t .9-,;! .9-,L II r;:: - - I I r I ~~~ . "- .1 I ~~~ . ~l I :D~20 I ~U)( .....J,~ N I ~ ------------ \"l.. ..c~.-:.~~n__ r-, 10 i 1 L_~ .6-,2 .to-, i!j~e~ . 15 >< \li!'l! li:~~i ~ "';:> ..><t.!;g x~au ~('IUiiI .. w t; I ~~~~ ~t.!t.!": I "zi!ju IIIB.ui!i \.J I g20!!l20 It;~~)( ~ ...~ I \\l N I=l W ~ > <t U X W Z :::J I I I I I I I :~I '" L':: -, I I . 1 I I )j/~~ I i;l~~ ... ;!Ut.! I c~z uuc . . U I ..oN. "'eIl 'T 'f)( I ""1'10 .. N -, I I I I ~~i Pl~E cJu . 88~ ~~O:a ~~: c:J N I I I I I ---~. . ~ ~ {H ... s: "('I u... "- ~fi~~ ~~~~ ~"h" ... .. "~)( ~~ ~ ,Ot ,8t .ahS ~. /~~cl I .'hE: / .9-,E: .v-,L / B u 8 . . ....l I "~/ Co!!l20 I ~ _ " ~ J-" ~ .\ J}?<" ~~~ I - - -- -::r .,~ -a-.-1- _ _ - ~ "- i!= ..~ ~ I / "- ..... III" / "- 1/"- / " ,llt ~:S~^i~~ Ill~t: ~~ ~;!c..i ....e:l BBi!i~~~ .." (.J",~a:: CD!!i20!3~~ " l ~'Txt;...t: S"....M ~~ Exhibit F FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL I ~--- ~v . - .1. ",l . .. -JIl' /'\ ~ . . CERT 1 FICA TE OF SURVEY /<IJ?1HSl..RYfYNl K. flrtEI.SU?EIJfNTr SHOlIN IN FEET ),)(J OECIW,I.S or A FooTI ~oo~ HFERSQ'I/ ST. tJf. COR . . c<x..lJ,CI\ ,.mlf5.l\tl. ~15421 I' \. E-. \rJ.. \-\ 6 ME.. 5 16121 7&8 11169 F^X I6QI 7illPOOl PROPOSED GQADES Ml'E _~.~.9_~_~ L o . I HON MOI-JUMf::NT BEAA I NOS ^RE PER PL!\T Q^RMIE SLAB' Q4\..:.9. .. SPIl~E Si:T TOP Or- Q'_OCK' ~ 4l.4 '::.~" EX 151\ "10 r:LEVfo.T I UN ,j~ _,,,)( )' !'ROPO'5r.lJ ElEV SM!!I,I!:NT FLooA . ._\.'\""/r- . OR,'.INMr: "p.~oi.t '\'71. '\ t,,,.) 'I( ~ \..1)00,.,.\4 S Go,- o .5Q l=~ Randy l. Kurth. l.L.S, No. 2027 Runell J. Kutlll. L.L.S, No. 16113 t,}. ~ o o ~ o r ~ \.....01 \, B Loc-~ ~ SC^LF. IN FlEEr C:> ~\::- 'R. \ b c.. Go ~ -::.. .,... t:- "\ c::. ~ ~ G. c:....O ~t> ..b... 'P 0 \ ~\ 0 ~ " ~ 'Ac=:~~c:a:.~~ Qo,> ~~. 3(.,..Co\ '1.0 r- 'l-r. 0 I '6 ~ 1::r E.. po.. ~ -r \ ""=:>l.e., S 5> I ~.n_ __ - -- -~ ----~ I)_'"~"" ~ O""T~ ."""....."... ~ I l '1 la ~R:t ~j~ J ~ ~ ~ '" .....,... 1':)lJIr sv 5~ ~'Jl~q,,~ .. I ~i .~Q'll.. '""~~ /11 (}.. t.tiP' l . JI N '0.0 "':d '.i\:':- , '';11,,", _":\",.~"l7 I I 1'1l..c.') \"" ~~ \") ':i ' ... ... ". . . ~ ..\ . \,.l~ \1 \1 \. ~ , , :- "tto"".)~"'~" 1,.tA...~ ~\\.. r l' i\' ...-;..~,o..~~ 1:e .~':, ~~ .J\ '1..4 ~'1.lj ~- -\ iO;Q~~~ ()'" 2: '" r- , ~1" /~ ~;...o\ ..~ () ~ \.;... G:. '. 1~~~lt6f,O "to" o~ 1"\....Q.'e. CIlt"'~,c. .' )\ ~ . C RIO ,0..'0 . . ~ ~o\lft.\~ \ 1."" '].'t" Cl\]~-' . NORTH If rt. "0 .Jo .....:; - ~ o ()t lq ~ - ~ .I" Q j c). , ~ .0 If\ ) , 0 j 0 d. 0 ti Vl \9 q'31. <. Exhibit G ORIGINAL SITE PLAN . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 2002 . FROM: Mayor and Council Members Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~ TO: RE: A Motion Setting the Date for the second meeting in May The 2002 City Council meeting schedule was set for the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. If a meeting date falls on a holiday, Council may determine an alternate meeting date. The 4th Monday in May falls on the Memorial Day Holiday- May 27. In past years, Council had rescheduled this tl1eeting for the Tuesday following the holiday. Council should determine if it wishes to reschedule this meeting, and whether to hold it on Tuesday, May 28, or an alternate Monday date, whi9h may be more suitable to Council's schedule. . COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A motion setting t~e date for the second meeting in May of 2002. ~?A ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER