112601 CC Reg AgP
.1
41 "'.'
1\
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2001
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
Mayor Love_
Garfunkel _
Lizee _
Zerby _
Turgeon _
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of November 5,2001 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B. City Council Work Session Minutes of November 5,2001 (Att.-#2B Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein:
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removedfrom the Consent
Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda.
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List (Att.-#3A Claims List)
B. Approval of Insurance Renewals (Att.-#3B Finance Director's memorandum)
C. Approval of Certifying Special Assessments - Delinquent Utility Charges (Att.#3C Finance
Director's memorandum; Resolution)
D. Transfer of Equipment with SLMPD (Att.-#3D Administrator's memorandum)
E. Acceptance of Eddy Station and Authorization for Final Payment (Att.-#3E Public Works
Director's memorandum)
F. Authorize Expenditure of Funds for Computer Upgrades (Att-#3FPublic Works Director's
memorandum) .
G. Approve Extension of Deadline to With Notice to Remove (Att.#3G _ Planning Director's
memorandum) .
Appellant: Leroy Cramer
Location: 4475 Enchanted Lane
4. PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Service A ward to former Park Commissioner
~
..
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - November 26,2001
Page 2 of2
5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
6. PARKS - Report by Representative
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held November 13,2001 (Att.-#6A Draft Minutes)
B. Lake Linden Drive Trail Request - Directing WSB to Prepare Feasibility Report (Att.-#6B
Public Works Director's memorandum)
7 PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. Tritch Estates Preliminary Plat (Att. #7 A - Planning Director's memorandum, City Engineer's
memorandum)
Applicant: David Alan Inc.lBarbara Toothman
Location: 6060 Strawberry Lane
B. Amendment to Zoning Code Establishing Conditional Use Process for 24-hour Businesses
(Att.#7B Draft Amendment)
8. GENERAL
A. Acceptance of Conservation Easement (Att.#8A Draft Resolution)
Grantor: Dean Riesen
Location: 20030 Excelsior Boulevard
B. Glen Road No Parking Request (Att.#8B Planning Director's memorandum)
C. Funding Allocation for New SLMPD Station (Att.-#8C Administrator's memorandum, Draft
Resolution)
9 ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
A. Glen RoadlAmlee Road Drainage update (Att.-#9A Public Works Director's memorandum)
10. REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
1. Gideon Glen
2. County Road 19 Intersection
3. T.H. 7/41 Project
4. Fertilizer Legislation
B. Mayor & City Council
11. ADJOURN
I
L
l'
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128' www.ci.shorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, 26 November 2001
t..
A 6:00 p.m. Work Session is scheduled with Tad Shaw regarding MCES
A Work Session will follow the Regular Council meeting to discuss MCES recreation and park
planning and the City Newsletter.
Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval.
Agenda Item #3B: The City's Property/Liability insurance package renewed on November 1,
2001. The total package renewal premium for next year is $84,303 compared with
$71,504 last year. Rate increases are due to recent events that have adversely impacted
the insurance industry and losses this year the city experienced with the Eller Media case
and the Johnson land-use case. The City budget has allocated $84,800 for this coverage
across all funds for all lines.
Agenda Item #3C: This motion approves a resolution setting delinquent utility charges and
other charges and fees to be certified to the County as a levy on the propel1y taxes. This
resolution is passed annually.
.
Agenda Item #3D: The SLMPD proposes that Shorewood transfer title of the City's
snowmobile (which we bought for patrol and rescue in Shorewood) to the police, so that
a snowmobile may be sold and the proceeds used toward the purchase of an all-terrain
vehicle (ATV). The SLMPD Coordinating Committee has endorsed this proposal.
Agenda Item #3E: Eddy Station has been completed by Cm Construction, and is ready for the
City's acceptance. Staff is recommending approval of the motion that accepts the project
and authorizes final payment.
Agenda Item #3F: Staff is requesting approval for the expenditure of funds for an
engineering cad workstation. Dell online services provided the low quote for an amount
of $1,977.50. This will be funded through the engineering operating budget. Review of
the budget indicates that the fund will support this purchase
ft
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 26 November, 2001
Page 2 of 3
II
, .
Agenda Item #3G: The Planning Director recommends approval of a request by Leroy
Kramer for and extension of time to comply with a Notice to Remove. 30 days are
recommended. Approval of this appeal requires a simple majority vote.
Agenda Item #4A: Mark Themig will be present this evening to receive recognition for his
service on the Park Commission.
Agenda Item #6B: On November 13th, 2001 the Park Commission passed a motion
recommending that the City Council adopt a motion directing WSB and Associates to
prepare a feasibility study for the Lake Linden Drive Trail Project.
Agenda Item #7 A: David Alan, Inc. and Barbara Toothman have applied for a preliminary
plat to divide the property at 6060 Strawberry Lane into six residential lots. You may
recall that the Council gave the applicant (Tom Tritch at the time) permission to include
leftover City property from the Church Road cul-de-sac project into this plat. The City's
intent when the street was built was to recoup part of the cost of the land by selling it to
the adjoining property owner for the amount of two assessments. Since drainage and
grading remain to be finalized, the Planning Commission has asked to see the final plat
for this when it comes back. Approval of the preliminary plat requires a simple majority
vote.
.
Agenda Item #7B: The Planning Commission initially discussed an ordinance prohibiting
business from being open 24 hours. After considerable discussion, they agreed
unanimously to recommend a conditional use permit approach to regulate such
businesses rather than banning them all together. Attached is the draft that they have
recommended. If agreeable to the Council, staff will prepare a formal amendment for
adoption at the 10 December meeting. Approval requires a four-fifths vote.
Agenda Item #8A: At the 22 October meeting the Council adopted a resolution expressing the
City policy of acquiring conservation easements. Mr. Dean Riesen proposes to grant .
such an easement over the northerly third of his property at 20030 Excelsior Boulvard.
To take full advantage of tax credits for this type of gift, he intends to grant another
easement over the southerly third of his property in approximately three years. The
Mayor has suggested that Mr. Riesen's name be added to a plaque recognizing property
owners that have granted conservation easements.
Agenda Item #8B: Staff recommends approval of a request by the Gideon Woods Townhome
Association for no parking signs on Glen Road. Approval of the request requires a
simple majority vote.
Agenda Item #8C: The SLMPD Coordinating Committee has recommended that a new police
stationbe paid for on an ad valorem basis. Each city's required annual financial for the
new station would be its percentage of the total tax capacity of the member cities. The
resolution adopted by the Council on November 5,2001, has been revised to state the
.
.
1\.
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 26 November, 2001
Page 3 of 3
funding basis that would be specified in the amendment to the SLMPD joint powers
agreement.
Agenda Item #9A: On the previous City Council agenda there appeared the item for the
presentation of the preliminary feasibility repOlt for the Glen Road - Amlee Road
drainage project. Prior to the actual City Council meeting, it was discovered that the
alternatives proposed for the Glen Road - Amlee Road drainage area are in conflict with
the County Road 19 Intersection Realignment Project, and the Gideon Glen Project. All
of these projects are tributary to the same stOlmwater outlet, which ultimately drain to
Gideon Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Staff continues to work through the issues and will
keep the City Council updated as to the progress of the project.
"
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2001
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Zerby and Turgeon; Administrator
Dawson; Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown; and Finance Director Burton
Absent:
Planning Director Nielsen
B. Review Agenda
Engineer Brown asked to remove item #9B, the Amlee Road/Glen Road Drainage Report, due to
outstanding issues.
Lizee moved, Zerby seconded to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 22, 2001
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, approving the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of October
22, 2001. Motion passed 5/0.
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 22, 2001
Turgeon made a correction to the Motion on p. 3, Planning #7 A, paragraph 6, to read "Motion passed
4/0/1, Lizee recused." Lizee made a correction to p.2, Presentations #4A, to reflect the correct spelling of
Mr. Duane Udstuen's name.
Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of
October 22, 2001 as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
C. Joint Work Session. SLMPD and Cities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood, and
Tonka Bay, Minutes of October 25, 2001
Lizee made a correction to pA, the second to the last paragraph, to reflect the correct spelling of Mr.
Terry Forbord's name.
Lizee moved, Zerby seconded, approving the Joint Work Session Minutes of October 25, 2001 as
amended. Motion passed 5/0.
.:#=-J-J1
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 2 of 8
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Garfunkel moved, Turgeon seconded, approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda
and Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. Approval of the Verified Claims List
B. RESOLUTION NO. 01-069, "A Resolution Approving to Continue Participation in
the Livable Communities Act."
C. Approval of Extension of Deadline to Comply With Notice to Remove
Appellant: Dale Dallman
Location: 4830 Ferncroft Drive
D. RESOLUTION NO. 01-070, "Approving the Authorization to Appoint Light
Equipment Operator."
E.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-071, "Approving Authorization to Appoint Engineering
Technician."
.
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were none.
5. PRESENTATIONS
A. Report by Representative to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD), Tom
Skramstad
Representative Skramstad reported on approximately seven LMCD activities as identified in his written
~~~ .
Zebra Mussels - He maintained it is largely a matter of time until they become a problem for the Lake.
The LMCD sees the need for further education of both boaters and marina operators.
Motorized Watercraft Amendment - Designed to prohibit the use of motorized watercraft on certain parts
of the Lake in order to preserve the natural state of the remaining wetlands. The LMCD will be meeting
next week to analyze 3 areas.
Skramstad added his personal observation regarding the Upland Farms dredging of Six-Mile Creek. He
voiced his concern of how this will impact the area and what sort of precedent it sets for developers to
dredge access to the Lake. Currently, the developer here is challenging the LMCD's jurisdiction over this
issue, and the LMCD is trying to work on a defensible position in this matter. Mayor Love commended
the LMCD for the effort they have put into addressing the issues Six-Mile Creek presents.
Milfoil Harvesting - Started late due to high water and a late spring, but went well.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 3 of 8
2002 LMCD Board - Shorewood needs to appoint a Board member to the LMCD.
Water Patrol Deputies - Thanks to support from 13 of 14 communities, and additional funding from local
businesses, two deputies were added to the water patrol. There will be a meeting in November to compile
the statistics and results from the year, and the LMCD hopes to have a report to deliver in December
Mayor Love reiterated the City's desire to hear a report that measures the success of hiring the additional
deputies. Mayor Love also relayed a comment he received from a water patrol deputy acting as a
spokesperson for the group. The deputies, some with over 20 years of service, likened themselves to
volunteer fIrefighters, on the front lines providing the safety on the lakes. While in community service,
unlike fIrefIghters, these deputies do not have any retirement fund where monies are put aside for their
future and in turn encourages them to stay on longer. Mayor Love questioned whether a dialogue could
be opened up between the LMCD and the deputies to discuss the possibility of providing a pension plan
of sorts. These volunteer deputies are a unique breed. Skramstad commented that this was a good
suggestion, and one that he would bring up at his upcoming meeting with the Sheriff s department next
week.
.
Gray's Bay Marina - Open for business in 2002, with additional changes over the next three years, the
project is moving right along.
Boulder Bridge Farm - A violation of the multiple dock license has been observed this year with 11 boats
instead of 10 moored to its docks.
6. PARKS
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held October 23, 2001
As there was no Park Commission representative present, Engineer Brown reported on the latest meeting.
Brown reported that the Park Commission continues to go through the comprehensive planning process
for each park, setting up a full-blown comprehensive plan for the park system as a whole (including
trails). At the last meeting the Commission reviewed both Manor and Badger Parks as it continues its
process.
.
7.
PLANNING
Administrator Dawson reported that many items were acted upon, as reflected in the Minutes of the last
meeting. There was also a work session which included discussion on planning district areas and
subdivision ordinances. He also called attention to the pre-application for the application by Cub Foods
which will be presented in the pre-application stage at the November 26,2001, City Council meeting for
review.
8. GENERAL
A. New Building for South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD)
Administrator Dawson reported that there was overall agreement that new facilities were needed for the
SLMPD at the joint work session of the Shorewood, Excelsior, Greenwood, and Tonka Bay City
Councils. Dawson pointed out that a model resolution has been drafted for action by the city councils, of
which Shorewood is the first to take action. The resolution itself would commit the cities to amend the
joint powers agreement for the SLMPD. The changes themselves would require the cities to fund the
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 4 of 8
long-term financing of the facility and require an affirmative vote from each city council, prior to the
SLMPD Coordinating Committee awarding a contract, to construct the facility on the propel1y at 24140
Smithtown Road. Dawson added that there was general agreement that a second joint session should be
scheduled tentatively for Tuesday, November 20th at 8 P.M. at the Southshore Center.
Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, approving RESOLUTION NO. 01-072, "A Resolution Approving
Commitment to the Construction of a New Police Station for the South Lake Minnetonka Police
Department."
Turgeon took this opportunity to compliment Police Chief Bryan Litsey on his presentation to the joint
City Councils. Zerby added that he believed this to be a historic joint meeting and he was pleased to
support this important resolution to build a new police station for today and the future. Lizee commented
that she, too, strongly supports the new building as well. She said it has been a great effort working with
the community as a whole.
Mayor Love added that the overwhelming majority of council members at the meeting from all the city
councils. Every representative to the coordinating committee, which is comprised of the mayors of the
cities, has weighed in with support of this project. He maintained that seldom do people elected to city .
councils have the opportunity to make such an important commitment to the future of their communities.
The Mayor pointed out that the facilities we have now are totally inadequate for today's needs and many
of the struggles we see nationwide give clear evidence to that, much less the natural disasters we often go
through in our area. He commended Chief Litsey and Fire Chief Mark DuCharme for their hard work on
these critical issues. Mayor Love also noted that Shorewood has the unique honor to be the first City
Council to pass this resolution, but he was confident and anxious that the other City's would follow suit
shortly.
Motion passed unanimously 5/0.
9. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
A. Approval of County Road 19 Preliminary Layout
Brown referenced the preliminary layout for the County Road 19 intersection realignment project. Brown
noted that staff has been working nonstop with WSB Associates to urge the County to approve this .
geometric layout. The City can finally sign off on the geometric layout. It has gained support and
incorporated some of the County's key issues into this final diagram. Most significantly, Brown
identified the addition of center raised medians, that the County felt very strongly were necessary. The
City and WSB have also spent a great deal of time trying to minimize the impact to driveways. He added
that while several details will be worked out in the final design, they are shown here in concepts in order
to get them down on paper to get feedback. Property owners, as always, will be given the oppOltunity for
feedback in negotiation with the County. For example, in concept the entrance to Floors Plus has been
redesigned to line up with the entrance to Smithtown Crossing. Preparations are also under way to
incorporate advanced warning lights and flashers at the entrance to the new the public safety campus, as
well as an additional turning lane and wider shoulders. Mayor Love observed that, while invaluable, the
advanced warning flashers would be most effective from the east near Shorewood Lane. Brown
continued, that over the past week, he has spent a great deal of time speaking to business owners to get
their feedback, and so far, it has been positive in regard to the layout. Brown concluded with staffs
recommendation to adopt the revised resolution, which approves the geometric layout and authorizes staff
to proceed with the final design aspect of it. He added that the City of Tonka Bay will not take formal
action on this matter at its next meeting, but at the following one instead. Mayor Love inquired whether
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 5 of 8
this would cause a delay. Brown replied that the County merely needs approval by the end of the year.
Mayor Love then asked how pedestrian traffic will flow. Brown stated that the sidewalk is slated to
follow the entire length of the roadway; however, which side it will be on will be determined in the final
design stage. He added that it has been discussed among staff that the sidewalk continue on from County
Road 19 to the City Hall driveway access.
.
In regard to a left turn lane at Glen Road, Brown mentioned that, although not a part of the formal design,
over the years staff has received numerous comments favoring a turn lane at the intersection. Brown
stated that Council should direct staff to pursue the addition of a turn lane as part of this project.
Preliminary comments with the County have indicated that funding this additional turn lane is not out of
the realm of possibilities with the current project, but staff will need direction from the Council to pursue
it. Turgeon commented that she had been contacted by the Gideon Glen Homeowners Association asking
about a turn lane because there have been some bad accidents there. They asked that with the
construction of all the new homes, apartments, and town homes on Glen Road and Amlee Road, that the
City consider putting in a left-turn lane somewhere there. People seem to be passing on the right
shoulder, where pedestrians may be walking, which is making for many near misses and accidents.
Turgeon strongly encouraged the Council to look at a turn lane as part of this project.
Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-073, "A Resolution Approving
the County Road 19 Reconstruction Project Preliminary Layout and Directing Staff to Look into a
Turn Lane at Glen Road as Part of the Project." Motion passed 5/0.
B. Acceptance of Amlee Road/Glen Road Drainage Report - Removed from Agenda
C. Authorization for Expenditure of Funds for Storm Sewer System Repairs
.
Brown reported on the need for storm water sewer repairs of the culverts at Edgewood Road that are not
able to handle the flow. He maintained that it is vital to storm water management to repair these four
culverts and replace them with two new pipes. One of the potential vendors consulted can begin now,
while the other cannot begin until December, which may be too late. Staff is asking that the expenditure
of funds be approved at this time, if they are not, this may dramatically affect the safety of four homes on
Edgewood. One other area with significant drainage and flooding problems, which would be included in
this expenditure, is the Pine Bend location. Brown pointed out that the City does allocate approximately
$22,000 to take care of minor drainage improvements that even extend onto private property.
Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, Approving the Expenditure of Funds for Storm Water Repairs.
Motion passed 5/0.
D. Acceptance of the Smithtown Road Feasibility Report and Setting Date of Open
House Meetings
Brown reminded Council that staff has been working on a feasibility report with WSB for rehabilitation
of Smithtown Road, extending from Country Club Road to the Victoria City border. Brown invited Dave
Hutton, of WSB, to present the details of the report.
Mr. Hutton pointed out that the report looked at several options, including an overlay, reclamation, and
the addition of a drain tile system for the approximately 13,600 linear feet of roadway. Each option was
reviewed; however, the opportunity to receive State Aid monies for a repair, which would recycle the
existing blacktop incorporating it into the reclamation process, far outweighed the need for a new
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 6 of 8
"
,
realigned roadway with no State Aid assistance.
Hutton reported that while the reclamation option is more expensive, it provides a more permanent,
longer-lasting road. An overlay typically extends the life of a road 7-10 years, while a reclaiming would
extend the life 12-15 years. In addition, with a reclamation project, there is more opportunity to correct
minor deviations in the grade or slope. Installation of drain tile would be laid along both shoulders to
preserve the integrity of the roadway by not letting water seep under it. This alternative is recommended.
Hutton maintained that this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective.
Brown and Hutton proposed that Council accept the proposal this evening and set a date for an Open
House Meeting for the residents in December. That meeting could be followed up by the submission of
final designs between January-February, collection of bids in March, awarding a contract in April, and
completing the improvements in May-June.
Mayor Love asked for discussion. Zerby agreed with the feasibility report maintaining that it addresses
many of the issues we've had regarding this road for years. He felt the reclamation process, with the
drain tile installation, to be the most economical solution. Discussion of an Open House continued
without a specific date named at this time, but probably after New Year's.
.
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, to Accept the Smithtown Road Feasibility Report and Set a Date for
the Public Information Meeting as Recommended by Staff.
Turgeon questioned whether there was intent to develop a trail system along Smithtown. As liaison to the
last Park Commission meeting, the Commission voiced interest in incorporating a trail system into the
roadway project. Mayor Love maintained that while the City should provide trail information to the
residents, a trail effort should be driven by the homeowners.
Motion passed 5/0.
Attorney Keane cautioned the Council that staff should bring back recommendations regarding the right-
of-way issues, there are some options which can be made part of the work session or open house process,
by inviting people to participate in the easement process. Keane maintained that by volunteering this part
of the conversation early on, it may help to speed up the 120 minimum day of securing easements. Since
the tiling will be outside the traveled roadway, Keane felt this proposal brings in the need for clarity and .
.closure to the right-of-way issues as they relate to the area of construction.
Brown agreed that it is important to get a reading from people as they conduct the open houses.
Certainly, this proposal presented here will be much more palatable than some of the other proposals that
have been set forth because staff has tried to keep the road as narrow as possible this time. Turgeon asked
whether dialogue could be opened up with some of the people who we don't have right of way with in
order to get their feedback and give them a heads up. It's a process which may take a bit longer but may
be worth it in the long run. Brown agreed, stating that there is no real time constraint to this project and
that we may get a better feel of where they are if we can take the time to talk to owners in advance.
Attorney Keane encouraged the City Council and staff to secure the corridor right-of-way acquisition
without delay as a part of the project cost through State Aid. Brown stated that he was hopeful that the
easements could be negotiated with little trouble if the project is palatable to residents.
10. REPORTS
A. Administrator & Staff
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
. Page 7 of 8
.
.
1. Gideon Glen
Administrator Dawson reported that a meeting took place with the Watershed District last week to clarify
what can be done. The MCWD's consultant is getting ready to prepare an outline of a feasibility study
and the probable costs to perform that. The presentation is scheduled to be given for consideration on the
6th of December.
2. County Road 19 Intersection
Addressed in detail earlier by Engineer Brown.
3. T.H. 7/41 Project
Engineer Brown reported that the project is moving along well. The curb will be placed on the nOlth
frontage road of Highway 7 on Wednesday. Zerby asked when he anticipated Lake Linden Drive to
reopen. Brown indicated it should be reopened within two weeks. Zerby then asked how soon the
Highway 7 project into Excelsior would be wrapped up. Mayor Love leamed at the State of the City
Meeting of Excelsior, that, while the contract did not call for the project to be completed until next spring,
due to the mild weather conditions the contractor believed the project would be finished by late
November.
Mayor Love complimented Brown for his efforts, and asked Council to work with staff to draft a letter to
the Commissioner of Transportation regarding MnDOT's refusal to carry through with the
recommendations of the City on the Trunk Highway 7 and 41 project. He believed the DOT is not above
local jurisdictions when it comes to the areas that we live in, regarding both our safety and our
environment. Mayor Love found it terribly disconcerting that the recommendations could have been
overlooked, particularly after those closest to the scene, including the representative from MnDOT
himself, agreed with the recommendations. Although investigation showed clearly that the conditions
were not the cause of the accidents, Mayor Love was hopeful that no further accidents would occur. He
did, however, deem that a thorough look at the site and recommendations made by City staff and the
MnDOT representative had been overlooked and believed that to be abhorrent. With no objection, Mayor
Love asked staff to follow through with the draft to the Transportation Director and copy the Council.
4. Fall Clean-Up
Nothing to report.
5. Conditional Use Permit, Lake Fellowship Unitarian Church, 24575 Glen
Road
In Director Nielsen's absence, Engineer Brown reported that Lake Fellowship was able to have a wetland
delineation completed before the end of October. Since the Watershed District and the City requires that
the delineation be shown on a survey, representatives of the Church are debating going forward, due to
the surveying cost. In fact, Brown added, that they may actually opt to remove the pavement and retum
the parking lot to its previous condition. City Council agreed at its last meeting to extend the deadline for
the Church to apply for a conditional use permit to December 11, 2001. Brown stated that they will have
until then to either make their application or correct the violation.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 5, 2001
Page 8 of 8
i
6. December City Council meeting schedule
December 10, 2001, will be the only regularly scheduled City Council Meeting for the month of
December.
B. Mayor & City Council
Brown updated the Council on several repairs taking place this week, including, a leaky valve in the
parking lot to be repaired this Tuesday and the Amesbury back-up power connection will occur Thursday.
Lizee shared that the Holiday House Home Tour representative asked if the City of Shorewood would
consider donating $25.00 as a sponsor of the event. Scheduled for December 9,2001, it would provide
good advertising for the City. Council Members were in agreement to do so.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Love recessed the meeting to Executive Session at 8:23 P.M.. He convened the session at 8:24
P.M. Present were Mayor Love, Council members Garfunkel, Lizee, Zerby, and Turgeon; Attorney
Keane, Administrator Dawson; Finance Director-Treasurer Burton.
.
The council discussed a matter relating to litigation.
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded to close the Executive Session at 8:47 p.m. and to return to the
Regular business meeting. Motion passed 5/0.
12. ADJOURN
Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of November 5,
2001, at 8:48 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
.
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2001
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
8:30 P.M. or immediately following
Regular meeting
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 8:54 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Love, Councilmembers Zerby, Turgeon, and Garfunkel; City Administrator Dawson;
Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton, and Liquor Operations Manager Swandby
Absent:
Councilmember Lizee
B.
Review Agenda
. The Agenda was accepted without objection.
2. DICUSSION ON ENTERPRISE BUDGETS
Director Burton reported on the Year 2002 budget drafts for the City's Enterprise Funds, which include the
Liquor Operations, Water Operations and Water Debt Service, Sanitary Sewer Fund, Stormwater Management,
and Recycling Funds.
Liquor Operations -
Burton reported that the Liquor Operations budgets assume that business will be conducted as usual and sales and
expenditures will be maintained at current 2001 levels. Due to the uncertainty with each location, the budgets had
been developed very conservatively.
.
It was brought up that the Tonka Bay store would have to be relocated when the County Road 19 construction
commences. The Liquor Committee will be meeting soon to discuss future liquor locations, whether it is in the
strip mall or across the street temporarily at the Total Gas location. Swandby warned that a stoppage in any
business, even for a short time, can be detrimental and the temporary location may offer a better alternative.
Burton pointed out that, while we have a good working relationship with Tonka Bay and would hate to lose it; the
question remains whether they want to be in the liquor store business at all. Brown stated that he hopes to meet
with Mr. Mason, the mall owner, to discuss the major changes that the intersection will cause.
Swandby reported that the Waterford Plaza lease is subject to renewal for the first time in 7 years and staff is
negotiating to reduce either the amount of rent paid or the size of the space leased. Burton added that a reduced
space is reflected in the budget. Because the store has consistently operated at a loss, the City's Auditor has
advised that the City consider closing the location altogether if expenditures cannot be reduced. Mayor Love
questioned whether we could run two locations better than three. Burton maintained that since the Waterford
store has been a drain on the liquor funds, we'd be better off without it. Swandby added that it is difficult to
recruit and keep part-time help; thus, by eliminating the third store, he could use his fulltime assistant managers
more effectively.
Water Budget-
Burton reported that if one does not include depreciation, the City is cash-flowing just fine. She continued by
#;)8
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
Monday, November 5, 2001
Page 2 of2
explaining what effect the loss of the City of Victoria Tower Revenue had on the budget. In essence, she
explained that in order for the Water Funds to be self-supporting, it will be important to find alternate sources of
revenue to offset the loss of the Tower revenue. She pointed out that a water rate increase might be necessary by
2003 in order to assure the system is self-supporting, and that it can provide for improvements and enhancements.
She encouraged staff to monitor the rates every year to ensure that we are charging enough to make necessary
improvements. Brown added that radio drive by meter readers may be available soon and would be very useful.
Brown indicated that since September 11th, the City has also received numerous FBI bulletins urging it to
monitor and alarm many of its water facilities. Brown stated that, while the City has budgeted to alarm the two
water towers, larger locks would be installed on the remaining facilities.
Sanitary Sewer -
Burton reported that the Sanitary Sewer Fund is in a good position. Budgeted capital improvement projects will
be taking place in 2002. Brown indicated that a share in the vacuum jetter truck will be purchased jointly with
other cities and that repair work of certain lift systems will take place.
Storm water Management and Recycling Budgets -
.
Burton pointed out that the budgets are stable and balanced with Hennepin County Grant Funds. She noted that
the average number of households participating in recycling had declined and discussion ensued of how to
advertise, increase awareness, and encourage greater participation. Brown was surprised by the numbers and
believed that the recent commingling of recyclables would boost participation.
Burton reported that they might want to keep their eye on the stormwater management fees. Brown noted that
most cities charge roughly $15 per quarter for the service. Mayor Love suggested that this fund might offer a way
to pay for acquiring existing or future wetland projects.
Mayor Love asked about other sources of funding, including vending. Brown indicated that the vending monies
totaled approximately $300, nowhere near the estimated $3,000 that had been hoped to be generated. Although
rental revenues are encouraging, it is preferred the City get a concessionaire into Eddy Station in order to see
greater results.
3.
ADJOURN
.
Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, adjourning the City Council Work Session of November 5, 2001, at 9:45
P.M. Motion passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Kristi B. Anderson
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
PAYROLL APPROVALS
For 11/26/01 Council Meeting
.
Prepared by: ff/1lrj./l <'l" ; elk .
Cather. e BIke, Sr.
son, City Administrator
.
Date: 1/--,2tJ-O/
Date: /;}J /
,
Date: I'. 21D I
Payroll Register
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
1221 BURTON BONNIE M 1,789.21 11/6/01
1222 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,015.57 11/6/01
1223 EISCHENS JAMES E 785.26 11/6/01
1224 ELKE CATHERINE M 804.64 11/6/01
1225 FASCHING PATRICIA L 781.67 11/6/01
1226 GROUT TWILA R 891.07 ll/6/01
1227 HELLING PAMELA J 496.33 11/6/01
1228 JOHNSON. DENNIS D 1,042.20 11/6/01
Or ..' .
1229 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,172.66 11/6/01
1230 MASON BRADLEY J 1,027.81 11/6/01
1231 MOORE JULIE K 311.61 ll/6/0 1
1232 MOTIER BROOKE A 363.33 11/6/01
1233 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,045.86 11/6/01
1234 PANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,017.89 11/6/01 .
1235 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,388.50 ll/6/01
1236 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,101.08 ll/6/01
1237 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 584.31 ll/6/0l
1238 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 996.31 ll/6/01
1239 STARK BRUCE H 930.63 ll/6/01
1240 SWANDBY DONALD R 1,187.12 ll/6/0 1
1241 ZAVADA MITCHELL C 752.48 ll/6/0 1
1242 BURTON BONNIE M 1,789.21 ll/20/0 1
1243 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,041.72 11/20/01
1244 EISCHENS JAMES E 600.67 ll/20/01
1245 ELKE CA THERlNE M 804.64 ll/20/0l
1246 FASCHING PATRICIA L 781.67 ll/20/0 1
1247 GARFUNKEL JOHN J 184.70 11/20/01
1248 GROUT TWILA R 891.07 ll/20/01 .
1249 HELLING PAMELA J 483.38 11/20/01
1250 JOHNSON DENNIS D 1,068.34 11/20/01
1251 KARELS PAUL C 124.67 11/20/01
1252 LIZEE CHRISTINE G 184.70 ll/20/0 1
1253 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 1,029.86 ll/20/01
1254 MASON BRADLEY J 1,053.96 ll/20/0 1
1255 MOORE JULIE K 158.87 ll/20/0l
1256 MOTTER BROOKE A 435.70 ll/20/0 1
1257 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 1,045.86 ll/20/0 1
1258 PANCHYSHY JEAN M 1,017.89 11/20/01
1259 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,388.50 ll/20/0 1
1260 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,281.05 ll/20/0 1
1261 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 584.31 11/20/01
Monday, November 19, 2001
Page 1 of2
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
1262 SCHNEEW1N JACQUELYN K 990.14 11120/01
1263 STARK BRUCE H 956.18 11120/01
1264 SW ANDBY DONALD R 1,181.14 11120/01
1265 TURGEON LAURA 184.10 11120/01
1266 ZAVADA MITCHELL C 152.48 11120/01
1261 ZERBY MICHAEL S 184.10 11120/01
216989 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,808.64 1116/01
216990 CURTIS JOHN N 135.81 1116/01
216991 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,602.59 1116/01
216992 DUFFY DAVID C 223.34 1116/0 l'
216993 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 830.85 ll/6/01
216994 HIRSCH DANA M 143.01 11/6/01
216995 KARELS PAUL C 81.21 1116/01
216996 LATTERNER SUSAN M 383.64 1116/01
216991 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 1116/01
. 216998 MJOLSNES MOLLY D 151.47 1116/01
216999 SERSHEN HEATH D 51.26 11/6/01
211000 SWECKER LANCE M 140.46 1116/01
211001 THURSTON DOROTHY M 143.14 1116/01
217002 WALES MELISSA L 114.93 1116/01
211003 WANNINGER NICHOLE C 144.24 1116/01
211004 BAILEY BOYD C 530.60 11120/01
211005 BAKER RICHARD M 51.26 11/20/01
217006 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,808.64 1lI20/0 1
211001 CURTIS JOHN N 152.60 1lI20/0 1
217008 DAWSON CRAIG W 1,602.59 1lI20/0 1
211009 DUFFY DAVID C 148.44 1lI20/0 1
217010 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 710.30 1lI20/0 1
. 217011 HIRSCH DANA M 92.05 1lI20/0 1
217012 LATTERNER SUSAN M 373.41 11120/01
217013 LOVE CLIFFORD W 220.41 11120/01
217014 MARRON RUSSELL R 32.95 11/20/01
217015 MJOLSNES MOLLY D 114.51 1lI20/0 1
217016 PLATHE CRAIG V 89.41 1lI20/0 1
217017 SERSHEN HEATH D 105.56 11120/01
217018 THURSTON DOROTHY M 239.47 1lI20/0 1
217019 WALES MELISSA L 102.38 11/20/01
217020 WANNINGER NICHOLE C 105.18 11120/01
Total of Checks $52,191.60
Monday, November 19, 2001
Page 2 of2
PAYABLESAPPROVALS
For 11/26/01 Council Meeting
.
son, City Administrator
.
Date: / !-~O-o/
Date: IIM/
Date: JL.zLQJ
Check Approval Listfor 11/26/01 Council Meeting
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
31536 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 NOV UNION DUES 11/15/01 $156.90
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14 $156.90
31537 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. OCT SVCS 11/15/01 $120.00
TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B. $120.00
31538 BURTON, BONNIE PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 11/15/01 $13.00
TOTAL FOR BURTON, BONNIE $13.00
31539 FASCHING, PATRICIA PO/BANK MILEAGE 11/15/01 $5.17
31539 FASCHING, PATRICIA PO/BANK MILEAGE 11/15/01 $5.18
TOTAL FOR FASCHING, PATRICIA $10.35
31540 HENN CTY TREASURE TAXES PID 34-117-23-43-0022 11/15/01 $144.30
TOTAL FOR HENN CTY TREASURER $144.30
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321095 $142.06
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321095 $218.82
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321096 $375.12
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321135 $57.81
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321135 $531.42
31541 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/15/01 321397 ($31.78)
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $1,293.45
31542 ICMA RETIREMENT TR PAYROLL 11/6/01 11/15/01 $1,268.67
TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $1,268.67
31543 JOHN ANDERSON PLB REF PERMIT-6145 PLEASANT AVE 11/15/01 $20.00
31543 JOHN ANDERSON PLB REF PERMIT-6145 PLEASANT AVE 11/15/01 $0.50
TOTAL FOR JOHN ANDERSON PLBG CO $20.50
31544 KEEFE, SALLY OCT CONTRACT SVCS 11/15/01 $360.00
31544 KEEFE, SALLY OCT CONTRACT SVCS 11/15/01 $420.00
TOTAL FOR KEEFE, SALLY $780.00
31545 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES DEDUCTIBLE - CLAIM #11029119 11/15/01 $500.00
TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T $500.00
31546 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES POLICY ADOPTION CONF 11/15/01 $60.00
TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $60.00
31547 LEEF BROS MATS 11/15/01 564801 $29.44
TOTALFOR LEEF BROS $29.44
31548 MARK VII 11/15/01 337128 $336.60
31548 MARK VII 11/15/01 337135 $962.20
TOTAL FOR MARK VII $1,298.80
31549 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 62520193 $173.40
31549 MIDW EST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 63233074 $204.24
31549 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 63233082 ($6.40)
31549 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 63238172 $157.70
31549 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 63243198 $143.53
31549 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/15/01 63243248 $83.93
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $756.40
31550 MINN NCPERS GROUP NOV PREM 11/15/01 $12.00
TOTAL FOR MINN NCPERS GROUP UFE INS $12.00
31551 MINNESOTA GFOA BEG FUND ACCTG COURSE 11/15/01 $35.00
TOTAL FOR MINNESOTA GFOA $35.00
31552 MINNESOTA STATE TR 3RD aTR BLDG PER SURCHG REPT 11/15/01 $3,878.72
TOTAL FOR MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER $3,878.72
.
.
;W~d~'~~d;:;'";N:;~;:"b;;:21:2oo'i:"""""';;";";'""'";,c::;rC;;""";':":;;;;"\"","'.'"""""",",,;;,,;,:r:,,:...s":.,,,",,'-z....,,;.;;','iC,:.'.::.:,C1;.,:.;,;:...
:,~.',:,.:,,;:;..'":;;;A~I;;!.;,:;,:::i,I::,~i,'::.;.:::,.~'"".i:l,,~~~:~~:J:I>C~~;;.S':'ilt;.C::I,I,,:.:,:::.-,::~k ~^ .':':;::.~_':.,:::il
Page 1 of 13
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amollnt
31553 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT - C SCHMID 11/15/01 $173.51
TOTAL FOR MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR $173.51
31554 MN SUN PUBLICATION FALL WINE SALE AD 11/15/01 461764 $100.00
31554 MN SUN PUBLICATION FALL WINE SALE AD 11/15/01 461764 $100.00
31554 MN SUN PUBLICATION FALL WINE SALE AD 11/15/01 461764 $100.00
31554 MN SUN PUBLICATION RINK ATTENDANTS AD 11/15/01 462796 $600.00
TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS $900.00
31555 NORTH STAR ICE 11/15/01 55129709 $40.80
31555 NORTH STAR ICE 11/15/01 55130204 $104.40
TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $145.20
31556 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV OCT/NOV SVC & BOARDING 11/15/01 $588.95
TOTAL FOR PA WS, CIA WS & HOOVES PET. $588.95
31557 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 10/21-11/03 11/15/01 $29.41
31557 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 10/2H 1/03 11/15/01 $83.84
31557 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH SEC 125 REIMBURSEMENT 11/15/01 $341.62
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $454.87
31558 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 11/15/01 77744163 $29.66
31558 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 11/15/01 n744167 $22.30
. 31558 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 11/15/01 77744176 $85.19
31558 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 11/15/01 79463794 $55.65
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY $192.80
31559 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 11/6/01 11/15/01 $1,878.Q1
31559 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 11/6/01 11/15/01 $1,722.07
TOTAL FOR PERA $3,600.08
31560 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE - FALL CLEANUP EXP 11/15/01 $48.76
TOTAL FOR PETTY CASH $48.76
31561 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 3249427 ($9.17)
31561 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 765836 $165.50
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $156.33
31562 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 NOV PREMIUMS 11/15/01 $1.95
31562 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 NOV PREMIUMS 11/15/01 $3.90
31562 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 NOV PREMIUMS 11/15/01 $3.90
31562 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 NOV PREMIUMS 11/15/01 $33.15
. 31562 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 NOV PREMIUMS 11/15/01 $64.55
TOTAL FOR PRUDENTIAL INS CO OF AMERICA $107.45
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 036332-00 ($62.23)
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 041794-00 ($0.01)
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 046832-00 $215.82
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 046927-00 $1,740.70
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 047471-00 $8.15
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 048095-00 ($9.27)
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 048095-00 ($9.10)
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 048099-00 ($27.81)
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 049165-00 $189.96
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 049166-00 $528.44
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 049167-00 $979.65
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 051527-00 $55.41
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 051528-00 $55.41
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 051529-00 $55.41
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052318-00 $535.31
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052318-00 $2,245.73
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052319-00 $1,338.60
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052320-00 $586.25
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052346-00 $446.09
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052346-00 $1,984.79
31564 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/15/01 052566-00 $270.93
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $11,128.23
31565 QUEST DEX 11/15/01 00967400600 $5.50
31565 QUEST DEX 11/15/01 00967401200 $133.30
TOTAL FOR QUEST DEX $138.80
31566 QUEST 11/15/01 $42.42
31566 QUEST 11/15/01 $42.64
31566 QUEST 11/15/01 $89.69
TOTAL FOR QUEST $174.75
31567 SHOREWOOD TRUE V 11/15/01 44899 $31.94
31567 SHOREWOOD TRUE V 11/15/01 45127 $4.04
TOTAL FOR SHORE WOOD TRUE VALUE $35.98
31568 STRAND, THOMAS REF ESCROW-VARIANCE APPLlCA 11/15/01 $150.00
TOTAL FOR STRAND, THOMAS $150.00
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.65
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $27.14
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $27.14
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.65
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.34
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.33
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.33
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $27.14
31569 SWANDBY, DONALD OCT MILEAGE/EXPENSES 11/15/01 $11.65
TOTAL FOR SWANDBY, DONAW $150.37
31570 THE ST PAUL L1Q LIABILITY INS 11/15/01 $2,860.34
31570 THE ST PAUL L1Q LIABILITY INS 11/15/01 $2,860.33
31570 THE ST PAUL L1Q LIABILITY INS 11/15/01 $2,860.33
TOTAL FOR THE ST PAUL $8,581.00
31571 TONKA PRINTING CO. MECH PERMITS 11/15/01 9743 $121.41
TOTAL FOR TONKA PRINTING CO. $121.41
31572 TOTAL REGISTER SYS CASH DRAWER KEYS 11/15/01 12169 ($21.30)
31572 TOTAL REGISTER SYS REGISTER TAPE 11/15/01 12472 $57.48
TOTAL FOR TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS $36.18
31573 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI 11/15/01 7802966 $35.35
31573 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI 11/15/01 7838723 $117.56
TOTAL FOR US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP $152.91
31574 VERIZON DIRECTORIE 11/15/01 $62.65
31574 VERIZON DIRECTORIE 11/15/01 $16.80
31574 VERIZON DIRECTORIE 11/15/01 $16.80
TOTAL FOR VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP $96.25
31575 WASTE MANAGEMENT 11/15/01 0205530-159 $99.64
31575 WASTE MANAGEMENT NOV SVC 11/15/01 0205531-159 $230.08
31575 WASTE MANAGEMENT 11/15/01 0205548-159 $62.86
TOTAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT $392.58
31576 A-1 TERRY'S LOCKSMI REPR BACK DOOR DEADBOL T 11/16/01 18534 $80.15
TOTAL FOR A-I TERRY'S LOCKSMITH SVC $80.15
31577 ADVANCED IMAGING S MONTHLY CONTRACT 11/16/01 005550 $150.00
TOTAL FOR ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC $150.00
.
.
~.. '? ~:~:.";i,.~' ,.".~'.,':,':"':':..~,::_6}.:x'L:L~ 'i'.._:L,.~::,)~:(\.::,::.;:~J";:""'t_"~~1~~.'.I.':,,:;.:..:.:.::.~..;:..,,: . ~_:':.;.l':;_,.:_,:,:.ui:;;j.~'d,;k:.i;:::,'..:~:~:~:-~':',,,:;.
'.;;:J;-,~:;:..'.:';:"'.::~:::::;.;;,.':.'i::;:;::1~:.~i:;:.::"_~ili::..:'::.:.::::L:,'::,::.~:.J.:'.;,"::.;';_i:;':;,;;;.,::,\'i::.:.~~';;"'_,_::.:'_:::';,:';_;_ .".;~~~::.i_"':;:2,;)~':;:';';;;.,:'
:;':::;;::',:J';;i:; ~:.:f,:;~;'~.',;i.\':,::,,:;,..::';:;::"':, ' , _"I_'V""~_~~'::"~:.::.:~,~;;;~:;:L:::;:';;;':.:.';;:::.:',,;;~
Wednesday, November 21, 2001 Page 3 of 13
.
.
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
31578 AKINS, JAMES & TRAC TREE ESCROW-27820 ISLAND VIE 11/16/01 $8,525.00
TOTAL FOR AKINS, JAMES & TRACY $8,525.00
31579 ANCHOR PAPER COMP COPIER PAPER 11/16/01 134724801 $137.14
TOTAL FOR ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY $137.14
31580 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 1 ST HALF NOV SVCS 11/16/01 $120.00
31580 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 1 ST HALF NOV SVCS 11/16/01 $120.00
TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B. $240.00
31581 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/16/01 34737300 $24.77
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $24.77
31582 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/16/01 22409100 $192.00
31582 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/16/01 22409100 $1,438.90
31582 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/16/01 22490600 ($56.10)
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $1,574.80
31583 BENGSTON CONSUL TI DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL 11/16/01 $692.00
TOTAL FOR BENGSTON CONSUL11NG LLC $692.00
31584 BROWNING FERRIS IN NOV SVC 11/16/01 10001-0200 $47.94
TOTAL FOR BROWNING FERRIS IND. $47.94
31585 COMPUTER MANAGEM GUI TRAINING CLASS 11/16/01 $80.00
TOTAL FOR COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SVC $80.00
31586 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/16/01 154350 $537.10
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $537.10
31587 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/16/01 157004 ($70.00)
31587 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/16/01 157005 $843.75
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $773.75
31588 GARAGHTY, JOE REF PRELIM PLAT APPL 11/16/01 $425.00
TOTAL FOR GARAGHTY, JOE $425.00
31589 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR SEPT ROOM/BOARD 11/16/01 000252 $285.75
TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER $285.75
31590 J.P. COOKE CO DOG TAGS 11/16/01 98106 $63.96
TOTAL FOR J.P. COOKE CO $63.96
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319382 $170.85
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319382 $263.32
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319383 $64.20
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319384 $33.10
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319385 $155.75
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319385 $512.49
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319389 $186.60
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 1319389 $250.99
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 172163 ($22.07)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 173184 ($22.60)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 173185 ($33.08)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 173798 ($8.35)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 174126 ($57.90)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 174127 ($6.20)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 175373 ($13.78)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 175460 ($4.83)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 175461 ($12.41)
31591 JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/16/01 175680 ($132.88)
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $1,323.20
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $766.00
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $766.00
-.',',:';'",~,:t;:':':;.:...;,::';t..i.'L.:,'.':..;:.,::,:.:,'_.c,:':.":',:.;::"':~" , ...., , , . C' _0'0_'1., .: "::,::.;",~L_';';"'c:'='::..:~:;:;.,!:',':",",;i2i',...::.::),J.-;l';;::,~';;;;,;;;.
."':_:":..,,,,,~:L:-::'" ~.
we(iizesda.v, November 21, 2001
".' '.t."::'::;~';~:;;'.;. ::''.:.:':: .;',:::..;,,:::,,;':::.~:';.;,;..:~:..;..:,\'.L'i~~;i;':'".'.,;:;.:':~.:, \. '!::~':'::L;.;!.~';. :~~:~6;.':;',!::'':::\~:ei"-,':,~.:,',,,,:,;.'.'i\~L:;;.i''__:
:'~';~:,'.). ',-;:..'.:;:::;J
Page 4 of 13
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $268.00
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $268.00
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $10,566.00
31592 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 11/16/01 $766.00
TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T $13,400.00
31593 LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH SEC 125 REIMBURSEMENT 11/16/01 $109.46
TOTAL FOR LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH $109.46
31594 MARK VII 11/16/01 339684 $1,013.60
31594 MARK VII 11/16/01 339685 $12.00
31594 MARK VII 11/16/01 339690 $746.85
31594 MARK VII 11/16/01 339692 $568.25
31594 MARK VII 11/16/01 339693 $15.20
TOTAL FOR MARK VII $2,355.90
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 10000/10032 $36.00
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 10000/10032 $36.00
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 9998/10030 $36.00
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 9998/10030 $36.00
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 9999/10031 $61.65
31595 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 11/16/01 9999/10031 $61.65
TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING $267.30
31596 MC.LEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $137.12
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $45.29
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $469.97
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $102.45
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $100.46
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $99.07
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $92.41
31596 MCLEOD USA 11/16/01 260506 $90.73
TOTAL FOR MCLEOD USA $1,137.50
31597 METRO WEST INSPEC CONTRACT SVCS-OCT/NOV 11/16/01 $1,380.00
TOTAL FOR METRO WEST INSPECTION SVC $1,380.00
31598 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/16/01 63248171 $99.14
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $99.14
31599 MINNCOMM PAGING 11/16/01 52006811013 $8.63
TOT,AL FOR MINNCOMM PAGING $8.63
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $29.12
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $44;66
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $44.52
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $32.14
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $13.41
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $7.16
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $4.62
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $1.74
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $46.65
31600 MINNEGASCO 11/16/01 $17.22
TOTAL FOR MINNEGASCO $241.24
31601 NORTH STAR ICE 11/16/01 55131109 $95.40
TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $95.40
31602 OFFICE DEPOT 11/16/01 142185488-0 $123.25
31602 OFFICE DEPOT 11/16/01 142185488-0 $14.04
TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $137.29
31603 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 770290 $122.15
.
.
"".,,',I'.:-,.:..c_.':.'-:'.:'-:'::-,.,'.:",":",...,.
Weit'l;;sday~ Noveti'ber2i;iiJoT
, "."_ .."_.",,.._~ .," ':"""":'_"__'''''-_'''' . "~'""_""'.,,"'__~____'_~' . c . '""_"_"'-_"'__"''"'''^;;'''-M'''_''''':-_~:''''_''C._.''_",u,___:__'~;'_.>:-__~,~:.,.:"_....._.~.,~:_..:.~
.:: ~. -, .ii:,:,_.,:..:';:, '.;:.,'.'.::::~,'':'';.t::<i:!;.:.:;"-,,,,'.~',,~~, ,.._,':;:~.",:;.;'"~"::::'i(,_. .. ::j,
Page 5 of 13
Description
Check # Vender Name
31603
31603.
31603
31603
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
31604
.
31605
31605
31606
31606
31607
31607
31607
31607
31607
31607
31608
31609
.
31610
31610
31610
31610
31610
31610
31611
31612
31613
31614
31615
Check Date Invoice #
11/16/01 770290
11/16/01 770291
11/16/01 770293
11/16/01 770293
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 033344-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 052316-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054425-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054426-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054427-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054979-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054979-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054980-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054981-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054981-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 054982-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/16/01 055103-00
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
11/16/01
11/16/01
QUEST
QUEST
TOTAL FOR QUEST
SENIOR COMMUNITY S OCT CLEANING SVCS 11/16/01
SENIOR COMMUNITY S OCT CLEANING SVCS 11/16/01
TOTAL FOR SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242554
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242554
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242596
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242596
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242763
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/16/01 242763
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA
TONKA PRINTING CO. ENVELOPES 11/16/01 9759
TOTAL FOR TONKA PRINTING CO.
WINE COMPANY (THE) 11/16/01 067251
TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE)
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
XCEL ENERGY
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY
A1-MINNETONKA RENT BALL JOINT PRESS
TOTAL FOR Al.MINNETONKA RENTAL
AKINS, JAMES & TRAC ESCROW BAL-27820 ISLAND VIEW
TOTAL FOR AKINS, JAMES & TRACY
BIFFS, INC.
TOTAL FOR HIFFS, INC.
CHAMPION AMERICA I SIGNS
TOTAL FOR CHAMPION AMERICA INC
CHAMPION AUTO STO MISC PW SUPPLIES
11/16/01 0031-505-16
11/16/01 0196-307-66
11/16/01 0198-208-36
11/16/01 1692-607-26
11/16/01 2052-902-66
11/16/01 2164-107-16
11/21/01 91354
11/21/01
11/21/01 W144879-88
11/21/01 R082244-01
11/21/01 D-117745
Amount
$5.23
$551.55
$9.36
$173.90
$862.19
($11.26)
$76.46
$332.47
$332.46
$693.17
$9.94
$546.95
$74.95
$684.62
$41.94
$70.95
$773.30
$3,625.95
$99.05
$261.99
$361.04
$179.15
$266.25
$445.40
$2,534.05
$12.55
$2,962.35
$11.20
$12.80
$3,515.45
$9,048.40
$131.00
$131.00
$83.00
$83.00
$28.97
$396.03
$471.36
$697.73
$14.23
$97.19
$1,705.51
$16.94
$16.94
$4,262.50
$4,262.50
$758.60
$758.60
$557.80
$557.80
$434.43
:. .. '~,:~'::,:,:,.:~~~,;',';,:.~;,;;;,~!".:.::':':,:,,:,;,~::::.,~:..l:.::,;:':.;;'; :::";";',';:.::':~:"',;^"""",."..,..,.,-",:;-:ii:,,, ~ .
Wedllesday, November 21, 2001
"c""""'''.''-'''.-':''-','''' "':.7':.\"',"""',:"'""
._.._......_--_.._-,-"~...._..^........._..,.^.,
::::.:.:~:~:::.~:::."l'.'..'j,,:,,':L:~.:. i::,c'.;::: ..;:;:=-',-:,~:;:.::,;:~.::.:.:,;:::,~", ::";::':;,:L.~':.,::.,:A:.;:.~~'~:'::':;..'::~:;::,';:,,~:'~':":,,:':~,>:.'"^'.;:..i:......::~;~:.:.~;.
,_:::_:~:.:;:_'::...,'
Page 6 of 13
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR CHAMPION AUTO STORE #344 $434.43
31616 CULLIGAN BOTTLED W 11/21/01 103101 $31.74
TOTAL FOR CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER $31.74
31617 DAVIS, CHARLES 2000-2001 BOOT ALLOW BAL 11/21/01 $40.05
TOTAL FOR DAVIS, CHARLES $40.05
31618 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/21/01 154621 $19.20
31618 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/21/01 154621 $1,469.15
31618 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/21/01 154622 $1,503.01
31618 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/21/01 155167 $863.55
31618 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/21/01 155167 $19.20
TOTAl, FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $3,874.11
31619 DEM-CON LANDFILL IN DEMO FILL 11/21/01 520 $30.00
TOTAL FOR DEM-CON LANDFILL INC $30.00
31620 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/21/01 159278 $964.15
31620 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/21/01 159949 $28.50
31620 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/21/01 159949 $1,281.30
31620 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/21/01 159950 $1,474.00
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $3,747.95
31621 EXCELSIOR ACE HARD PW SUPPLIES 11/21/01 490524 $8.61
31621 EXCELSIOR ACE HARD PW SUPPLIES 11/21/01 492026 $19.46
TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR ACE HARDWARE $28.07
31622 FIL TERFRESH 11/21/01 56657 $54.00
TOTAL FOR FnTERFRESH $54.00
31623 G & K SERVICES PW UNIFORMS 11/21/01 103101 $425.89
TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES $425.89
31624 GOPHER STATE ONE-C 11/21/01 1100679 $35.65
31624 GOPHER STATE ONE-C 11/21/01 1100679 $35.65
TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, IN $71.30
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 451456 $1,045.20
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 451632 $896.46
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 451636 $962.12
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 451646 $656.93
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 452568 $44.96
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 452569 $44.96
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 452570 $106.69
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 452797 $850.80
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 571780 ($61.25)
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 571781 ($75.25)
31625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/21/01 572619 ($149.31)
TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $4,322.31
31626 HAWKINS WATER TRE WATER TREATMENT PRODUCTS 11/21/01 390108 $2,n6.38
TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $2,776.38
31627 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/21/01 323336 $254.08
31627 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/21/01 323337 $571.68
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $825.76
31628 ICMA RETIREMENT TR 11/20/01 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 11/21/01 $1,268.67
TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $1,268.67
31629 KOEHNEN, SCOTT REPRS F-150 FORD 11/21/01 $608.67
TOTAL FOR KOEHNEN, SCOTT $608.67
31630 LAKESHORE WEEKLY WINE SALE AD 11/21/01 00086177 $110.50
31630 LAKESHORE W EEKL Y WINE SALE AD 11/21/01 000861n $110.50
.
.
CW;d;I~~d~;,N~~~';;tb~;"21:"2001:,."':l""C:"''''"''.,
;-;',:::;,..'.,:i~~:."...:,-:r;;',::..,',~,:':.l.:::..,;:~~:":,~":::,~,~:_~,,:~:;i,,:.~':L:_:~..;:"':,.:~':..~-;;;'.~'_,'::':.~:.,!..,:;.t..l:,\:.;~.:~';';.;;:;'D,::i;'.:;..i::;,~.~:'l.rL'.:::'.:~"J'
:::~~~''::'..:::;_:~:J.._:_:__':'::.{_.''-::'::''''~::,:I.,:::,:,:-,-,_:;,,:,,::::::.,\
Page 7 of 13
.
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
31630 LAKESHORE WEEKLY WINE SALE AD 11/21/01 00086177 $110.50
TOTAL FOR LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS $331.50
31631 LOCAL LINK USA BUSI SVC 10-29 -11-02 11/21/01 110201-9522 $79.95
TOTAL FOR LOCAL LINK USA BUSINESS SERVIC $79.95
31632 MACQUEEN EQUIPME 2 LEAF LINKS 11/21/01 2017224 $80.21
TOTAL FOR MACQUEEN EQUlPMEN1~ INC. $80.21
31633 METRO COUNCIL ENVI OCT SAC REPT 11/21/01 $1,138.50
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $1,138.50
31634 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/21/01 63253064 $106.02
31634 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 11/21/01 63253205 $184.82
TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $290.84
. .
'31635 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT - C SCHMID 11/21/01 $173.51
TOTAL FOR MN CHIW SUPPORT PMI' CTR $173.51
31636 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CAB MOUNTS 11/21/01 111474-00 $42.60
TOTAL FOR MI'l DISTRIBUTING COMPANY $42.60
31637 NATL BUSINESS INSTI SEMINAR-LAB 11/21/01 1877370 $209.00
TOTAL FOR NATL BUSINESS INSTITUTE $209.00
31638 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 11/4-11/17 11/21/01 $6.38
31638 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 11/4-11/17 11/21/01 $92.46
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $98.84
31639 PERA 11/20/01 PAYROLL 11/21/01 $1,714.29
31639 PERA 11/20/01 PAYROLL 11/21/01 $1,869.53
TOTAL FOR PERA $3,583.82
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 053008-00 ($73.42)
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 055272-00 $18.84
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057234-00 $3,541.01
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057821-00 $209.61
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057821-00 $582.70
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057825-00 $1,429.53
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057827-00 $86.20
31640 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 11/21/01 057827-00 $1,437.12
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $7,231.59
31641 RUMPCA CO INC OCT LOADS 11/21/01 $144.00
TOTAL FOR RUMPCA CO INC $144.00
31642 SPEEDWAY SUPERAM 11/21/01 103101 $825.36
TOTAL FOR SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA $825.36
31643 STAR TRIBUNE ASST MGR AD 11/21/01 OCTOBER $90.67
31643 STAR TRIBUNE ASST MGR AD 11/21/01 OCTOBER $90.67
31643 STAR TRIBUNE ASST MGR AD 11/21/01 OCTOBER $90.66
TOTAL FOR STAR TRIBUNE $272.00
31644 SULLIVAN UTILITY SER REPR LIFT STATION 18 11/21/01 25362 $1,475.00
TOTAL FOR SULLIVAN UTILITY SERVICES $1,475.00
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243227 $2,768.90
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243248 $457.10
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243249 $11.20
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243249 $1,360.55
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243438 $44.55
31645 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/21/01 243438 $1,647.40
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $6,289.70
31646 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI 11/21/01 7864738 $16.76
31646 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI 11/21/01 7887328 $1,164.39
.
",'," ';'J.:,: " '-:: .:' -' ." .:"1.:::., .,:' ::::, ' .- c", ,,'-:' '. -,\ :"'....-.: -:. :,:",~: ":.;' '::....:~.:. c,' , .. . ,;~:~;",:;;':;';;'-,,:,;,_~,:,,::,,;';;":'..:;:;;:;::'.::..,::"";.~:.
;~..;.;: ~;, ;-:;':::.::~.;,,:',':':i:':,':~'!:_~':,i~:;;;,_";':.::::r;i:,::,::::;,;;':,~,~:;;'::':::"_:',,:'L_:':'::::.;...:.:'~.i;'
W edli~sday; No venlbfir'ii;' 2001
',,',""..,'''', '""-".:"''','''',:<-:'-':''''''':: ,.."....".".:.::.,'<':.,.,'''..'''
.. ._. ...,~^';..'"'"_....,_..~,.,..w;....,.."^'~,,~'-"'"'......,..~,,,,^.,_____...,__._....'_,,_
';:'-,_'::.,:_,,:;,^':.,.:__,::'.D:__~
Page 8 of 13
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP $1,181.15
31647 VERIZON WIRELESS, B 11/21/01 $137.02
TOTAL FOR VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLE VUE $137.02
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 48927 $447.46
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 49016 $221.65
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 49114 $1,112.97
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 49205 $886.34
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 49429 $223.59
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 49606 $446.35
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 50262 $225.25
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 50502 $661.36
31648 WM. MUELLER & SONS 11/21/01 51025 $4~4.69
TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. $4,669.66
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0074-000-16 $8.00
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0191-308-36 $32.12
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0208-203-56 $23.95
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0234-748-37 $8.13
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0326-600-56 $41.85
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0640-202-56 $10.64
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0675-505-16 $17.22 .
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 0942-567-36 $33.02
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 1350-001-36 $13.67
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 1351-508-06 $214.04
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 1541-203-60 $7.38
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 1641-408-36 $52.22
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 1776-835-20 $12.46
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 2095-300-56 $1,585.90
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 2325-902-36 $42.01
31649 XCEL ENERGY 11/21/01 2397-003-96 $9.12
TOTAL FOR KCEL ENERGY $2,111.73
31650 ZIEGLER, INC. BULBS 11/21/01 PCOO045678 $37.36
TOTAL FOR ZIEGLER, INC. $37.36
31651 ALCOHOL & GAMBLING RETAIL BUYERS CARD- TONKA BA 11/27/01 $20.00
31651 ALCOHOL & GAMBLING RETAIL BUYERS CARD-#2 11/27/01 $20.00
TOTAL FOR ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT $40.00 .
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753300 $33.31
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753300 $61.51
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753600 $9.82
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753600 $34.45
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753700 $41.08
31652 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 11/27/01 34753700 $14.98
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $195.15
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22549200 $590.85
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22549300 $1,093.47
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22549400 $621.25
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22565900 $336.00
31653 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 11/27/01 22565900 $1,361.26
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22566000 $96.00
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22566000 $878.05
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22566100 $48.00
31653 BELLBOY CORPORATI 11/27/01 22566100 $692.15
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $5,717.03
31654 CARGILL SALT DIVISIO BULK ICE CONTROL 11/27/01 21827365 $1,088.03
.
.
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount
TOTAL FOR CARGILL SALT DIVISION $1,088.03
31655 CM CONSTRUCTION IN FINAL PV-FREEMAN PK BLDG 11/27/01 $7,135.04
TOTAL FOR CM CONSTRUCTION INC $7,135.04
31656 DANIEL DICKEL, CONS SVCS 5/2 . 10/26/01 11/27/01 $3,908.00
TOTAL FOR DANIEL DICKEL, CONSULTANT $3,908.00
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 155427 $1,205.85
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 155640 $1,411.54
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 155980 $38.40
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 155980 $286.85
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 156238 $428.55
31657 DAY DISTRIBUTING 11/27/01 156239 $492.60
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBU71NG $3,863.79
31658 E.H RENNER & SON'S RENTAL PUMP-WOODHAVEN WELL 11/27/01 $1,500.00
TOTAL FOR E.H RENNER & SON'S $1,500.00
31659 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/27/01 162114 $1,992.10
31659 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/27/01 162806 $1,462.60
31659 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/27/01 162807 $3,100.85
31659 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/27/01 164973 $142.00
31659 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 11/27/01 164979 $507.10
TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $7,204.65
31660 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TV 11/27/01 10226 $58.80
TOTAL FOR FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COM $58.80
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455588 $1,412.08
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455589 $809.29
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455593 $920.22
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455594 $704.71
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455604 $639.63
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455604 $79.40
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 455605 $1,027.76
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458859 $253.28
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458860 $2,387.29
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458864 $203.56
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458865 $83.95
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458865 $1,053.78
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458876 $88.68
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 458877 $1,176.09
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 573487 ($131.44)
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 573488 ($115.54)
31661 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 11/27/01 573679 ($27.09)
TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $10,565.65
31662 HARDRIVES, INC PV#3- HWY 7/41 11/27/01 $598,526.63
TOTAL FOR HARDRIVES,INC $598,526.63
31663 HAWKINS WATER TRE 11/27/01 DM66216 $10.00
TOTAL FOR HA WKlNS WATER TREATMENT $10.00
31664 HEALTHPARTNERS DEC DENTAL PREM 11/27/01 15501461 $64.11
31664 HEAL THPARTNERS DEC DENTAL PREM 11/27/01 15501461 $112.19
31664 HEALTH PARTNERS DEC DENTAL PREM 11/27/01 15501461 $40.06
31664 HEALTHPARTNERS DEC DENTAL PREM 11/27/01 15501461 $421.36
TOTAL FOR HEALTHPARTNERS $637.72
31665 HERMEL WHOLESALE 11/27/01 324397 $254.08
TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $254.08
31666 HOISINGTON/KOEGLE SHOREWOOD VISION PROJ 11/27/01 $465.87
,- , .:~ .:.:" .:,:,:,~'}...~J:,'.:__:-": ': :.:'~-'."'[ .~':':"_.:__:;;..s,..-~-;;.';;;'_!;;.';;;';~::,';.;,:,:';!'.<,:~l'..:-. ., ",'" " 3~..~~:L_~.;.;::::':_i:':_~;::';.:-,;:;:-...i..:'.i'..:.:::~
:.::::';.,,.;i;(''-::,.i."l.:.. ':'~;::,;.~"_~c,~:',~!:.'-.:;~:."-:
.,' I:,.:.:. i~;;:..':.:;:~,":';;::,':'::t_~:;L.:;.'-\.o!",;'!.~:,,:,~~:'L:'.;.\ ..:E!.':.~:'.G:,'::;.'{;.:.':;;:J.i).",;;~'i~:,~:';"1:;:':;;';::'_,~::,:&:.;:;,::...:c:.~:',':~;:::;:,;~~,:,:,::,'''''
:;;'::::';;:;"':':.,::,:,,:,,
Page 10 of 13
Wednesday, November 21,2001
Check # Vellder Name
Descriptioll
Check Date III voice #
Amoullt
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31667
31668
31669
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31670
31671
31671
31671
31671
31671
31671
31671
31671
31671
31672
31673
31673
31674
31675
TOTAL FOR HOISINGTON/KOEGLER GROUP
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
JOHNSON BROS L10U 11/27/01
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO.
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER 11/27/01 391853
TOTAL FOR I.ARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY...
LK MTKA CONSERV. 01 4TH OTR LEVY PYMT 11/27/01
TOTAL FOR LK MTKA CONSERV. DISTRICT
11/27/01 243
11/27/01 291
11/27/01 342257
11/27/01 342258
11/27/01 342265
11/27/01 342266
11/27/01 342269
11/27/01 342270
11/27/01 344728
11/27/01 344729
11/27/01 344735
11/27/01 344736
11/27/01 344738
1322287
1322287
1322288
1322289
1322289
1322294
1322294
1325262
1325263
1325263
1325264
1325265
1325269
176299
176374
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
MARK VII
TOTAL FOR MARK VII
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
DEC PREM
TOTAL FOR MEDICA
METROCOUNCILENVI DECWASTEWATER 11/27/01 0000729821
TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT
MUNITECH, INC. DEC SVCS 11/27/01 7789
MUNITECH, INC. DEC SVCS 11/27/01 7789
TOTAL FOR MUNITECH,ING.
NORTHERN TOOL & EO EXT CORD/POWER LIGHT 11/27/01 82133454
TOTAL FOR NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP CO
11/27/01 142890120-0
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
MEDICA
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
11/27/01
10133510220
10133510220
10133510220
10133510220
10133512259
10133512545
10133512545
10133512545
10133512545
OFFICE DEPOT
~. :_ . : ,:':,i. -:-,::::_..,:,~;:::;_;:!;,' - ",.:",~.,-.,.:::~.....:.__.:,.....;...;_,...._.._:,...^.....,..' :-::.:. ,~:',:":'~'~:",,:':.',::,;'::..~:..:"~l":'.,.:.:~.:.:::::':^:'..::':'l:.:::i::
-:;."..;._',:;.:.::.._'...::,;;.;.....:..::.;:. ,:',-- ..::,:: ,~..,., _ -'..;...:....:...::.,.:...........:.,....1,,'.,.:: ;:.:iJ..i-, ':::;:":':':_;::::.:':;'i':L~:',:i'::r:"
Wednesday, November 21, 2001
.....,.-.-.,.--...-,.,-.....,..."..................,-..". ,,,'.
.' '.' .;..._~..;'.'".M.,.."",,;.,~'._.~':_..:..:'-'_.:';'~",..,.:"'__;~_~~__,;
$465.87
$544.75
$921.56
$446.88
$637.10
$2,045.27
$357.80
$1,467.79
$199.90
$53.75
$1,186.45
$33.10
$1,724.09
$591.10
($3.16)
($13.08)
$10,193.30
$5,692.00
$5,692.00
$5,955.94
$5,955.94
$0.50
$8.00
$1,344.85
$92.00
$2,415.45
$92.00
$1,514.10
$110.40
$542.15
$55.95
$867.25
$11.70
$384.90
$7,439.25
$3,410.62
$366.45
$641.30
$646.11
$1,222.21
$83.68
$83.69
$1,549.18
$83.68
$8,086.92
$53,780.47
$53,780.47
$5,100.00
$3,400.00
$8,500.00
$81.98
$81.98
$167.96
.
.
,:':]:~:;.;;.:-',.~',;:;:::;::;,;'~c::.::_;:i.:._._..__.__.,....:.,.,
Page 11 of 13
\'
Check # Vender Name
Description
31676
31677
31677
31677
31677
31677
.
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31678
31679
31680
31681
31682
.
31683
31683
31683
31683
31683
31683
31683
31683
31683
31684
31685
31686
31686
31686
TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT
ORONO, CITY OF NOV ANIMAL CONTROL
TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF
PAUSTIS WINE COMPA
PAUSTIS WINE COMPA
PAUSTIS WINE COMPA
PAUSTIS WINE COMPA
PAUSTIS WINE COMPA
TOTAL FOR PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
.
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
PHilLIPS WINE & SPIRI
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
POTTS, KENNETH N. OCT PROSECUTIONS
TOTAL FOR POTTS, KENNETH N.
QUEST DEX
TOTAL FOR QUEST DEX
QUEST
Check Date Invoice #
11/27/01 1277-01
11/27/01 161008
11/27/01 161011
11/27/01 161012
11/27/01 161012
11/27/01 161492
11/27/01 3250952
11/27/01 772728
11/27/01 772728
11/27/01 772728
11/27/01 772729
11/27/01 772732
11/27/01 772732
11/27/01 775013
11/27/01 775014
11/27/01 775015
11/27/01 775015
11/27/01 775015
11/27/01 775016
11/27/01 775016
11/27/01 775016
11/27/01 775019
11/27/01 775019
11/27/01
11/27/01 00989538900
11/27/01
TOTAL FOR QUEST
SO lK MTKA POLICE 0 DEC MONTHLY BUDGET
TOTAL FOR SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 11/27/01
TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA
TWIN CITY WATER CLI BACTERIA ANALYSIS FOR OCT 11/27/01 8090
TOTAL FOR TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
UNITED RENTAlS-HT B BARRICADE/BARRELS 11/27/01 263323
TOTAL FOR UNITED RENTALS-HT BRANCH #229
UNUM LIFE INSURANC DEC l TO PREM 11/27/01
UNUM LIFE INSURANC DEC l TO PREM 11/27/01
UNUM LIFE INSURANC DEC lTD PREM 11/27/01
cW~dne~da:v~'Novembe~'21~'201/i.~:..''
y::.::,,!::'i..:":..i.::'.:.r,:,,.::,';;'.:::,:;;::"
11/27/01
243832
243862
243862
243863
243863
243999
243999
244511
244511
..: :':';:":.,:'L:~..,;:.;:i:::;",:,,;',:'-;':,;':::,,';, :J;;;;::;::'".~;~.::':;':::..:;l::.:"~:;I.:
Amolmt
$167.96
$1,481.25
$1,481.25
$600.00
$734.00
$63.00
$1,058.22
$80.00
$2,535.22
($51 .40)
$37.00
$84.15
$591.65
$1,742.30
$1,029.05
$189.45
$136.50
$91.00
$31.00
$324.65
$498.55
$72.00
$896.90
$914.14
$379.40
$895.00
$7,861.34
$1,608.33
$1,608.33
$188.40
$188.40
$49.74
$49.74
$44,902.63
$44,902.63
$2,316.70
$1,190.65
$11.20
$22.40
$507.70
$49.55
$1,562.05
$15.95
$3,322.25
$8,998.45
$60.00
$60.00
$540.69
$540.69
$5.87
$13.61
$15.54
'';',':;:.,:.:::',:
Page 12 of 13
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount .,
31686 UNUM LIFE INSURANC DEC L TO PREM 11/27/01 $120.29
TOTAL FOR UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO $155.31
31687 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI WATER MTR - 2" 11/27/01 7910839 $522.75
31687 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI WATER PARTS 11/27/01 7924303 $28.94
31687 US FILTER DISTRIBUTI WATER PARTS 11/27/01 7925169 $817.02
TOTAL FOR US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP $1,368.71
31688 WASTE TECHNOLOGY, FALL CLEAN-UP 11/27/01 51937 $5,430.35
TOTAL FOR WASTE TECHNOLOGY, INC. $5,430.35
31689 WSB AND ASSOCIATE FIRE LANE BOUNDARY SURVEYS 11/27/01 01074-657-0 $3,171.00
TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIA rES $3,171.00
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 0145-009-26 $14.45
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 0408-607-95 $60.08
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 0615-308-36 $3.14
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 0677-702-26 $523.39
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1285-101-66 $18.45
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1373-808-26 $8.14
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1440-708-46 $236.33
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1564-303-36 $8.01
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1605-305-56 $91.97 .
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1724-866-54 $72.29
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 1732-704-10 $2,414.73
31690 XCEL ENERGY 11/27/01 2001-503-26 $15.55
TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY $3,466.53
TOTAL CHECKS $965,783.57
.
Wed~~~d~:~:;CNo~~~~b~r2tc20fttC';
". ......".,.""-',".,
.:...._,_...-.:..,.:,-;..;....:.",
,.~'~,..:::~:;...,:;::.."<,, ,,,~ ,
...........---..,.-,...,........
^ '.;'"~,'..'....."",'....,,.._.,..>;.,.,_~ .:"~,,,,c
._...,..........,.."'"".....___,"._m"n."...:,u
......:,._:_.;'-:,.:,..M."'_...~..___,;..,,,.__~.,.."^;:;..=J!.'
.~,~ :;.:,.'i,;^::...,,~:~:~:;..::;:':.:..\'f.-':.:~:.::;~:';.:s:.'~;,'~~~~~',"~::i.':':":'~'.::::... .:.;
Page 13 of 13
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 20,2001
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers ~
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director ~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~
.
TO:
RE:
Annual Property & Liability Insurance Renewal
.
Background
The City's Property/Liability Insurance package renewed on November 1,2001. This
municipal coverage is through the League of Cities Insurance Trust. The total package
renewal premium for next year is $84,303 compared with $71,504 last year. This
municipal package includes property, liability, worker's compensation, liquor liability,
bond, and umbrella coverage.
Increased Premiums
We were advised that we could expect substantial increases this year (in the area of 20%-
25%) because of recent events that have adversely impacted the insurance industry. The
City is doing a good job with risk management and loss control. However, we were
disappointed to learn the liability portion of the package increased substantially because
of current loss experience beyond the City's control. The City's experience mod has
deteriorated from .985 to 1.734 due to losses this past year associated with the Eller
Media case and the Johnson land-use case. The overall loss ratio for the three (3)-year
prior period is 106% and the five (5)-year loss ratio is 96%.
The good news is that the property portion of the premium increased by a reasonable
2.5% and the worker's compensation premium remained stable. A summary ofthe city's
coverage is attached for your review. Please note the grand total for the package is
$84,303 and the 2001 city budget allocated $84,800 across all funds for all lines.
n
\,.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
1:F3B
Insurance Renewal - Page 2
Liability Coverage Limits
This motion is considered by the City Council each year. Minnesota State Statutes set
tort liability limits for governmental units at $300,000 per claim/$750,000 total claims
per occurrence. The City carries tort liability at statutory limits and has excess liability
coverage of $1,000,000.
The City's insurer allows cities the option of waiving this limit, thereby allowing
payment of a larger claim. By waiving the statutory limit, the city opens itselfto larger
claims and higher insurance costs.
In prior years, staffhas recommended, and the City Council has elected, to not waive the
statutory limits. It is again the staffs recommendation that the Council approve a motion
that does not waive the statutory tort liability limits for the 2001/2002 insurance renewal. .
Please advise if you would like additional information or if we can be of further
assistance.
.
~
I
.
.
NDV-21-2001 15:02
KEN JARCHO AGENCY LLP
9528842358 P.01/01
C1~
t..
KEN ]ARCHO INSURANCE AGENC~ LLP
Phone (952) 884-2358
Fax (952) 884.6540
9052 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM
NOVEMBER 2001
The insurance market place has ohanged drastically in the past six mOnths because of the
lack of Insurance Companies investment return and the 9111/01 disaster. As such there are price
increases this year.
The City of Shorewood has been insured with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust since 1986. This program was established in the early 1980's with the intent ofinsuring
cities without producing profit for the insurance carrier, Ninety percent of the cities that are
eligible are enrolled in this program. The program has been very successful in maintaining
competitive rates in addition to paying dividends based on the program's loss ratio. not the loss
ratio of the individual city. Loss mtios are based on the annual renewal premiums excluding any
dividends paid. The City of Shorewood has qualified tor a dividend most years and the
following is a list of thc most recent dividends paid:
1995 - $18,763.00
1996 - $25,519.00
1997 - $22.722.00
1998 - $18.306.00
1999 - $13,179.00
2000 - $ 9.113.00
3 YEAR LOSS RA no IS 106% AND 5 YEAR LOSS RA 110 IS 96%. * The loss ratio
is driven on two claims primarily the Johnson Land-Use Claim & Eller Media Claim.
Our agency has written coverage for Shorewood sinee 1984, originally with Marinco
Insurance Company out of Texas, and then through the League program.
Annual premiums are based on tbe total program's experience and Shorewood's
experience within the program. The total paokage renewal premium for 2001-2001 is
$52,187.00 compared to $41,305.00 last year. The annual Umbrella prcmium for 2001-2002 is
$7,108.00 compared $5.274.00. This inoludes both exposures changes and price increases.
The City of Shorewood has always elected to renew ''without the waiver of monetary
limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statue 466.04". Our underwriter at the League
has intonned us that a large majority of cities he works with. choose this option.
TOTAL P.01
1
NOV-21-2001 14:30
KEN JARCHO AGENCY LLP
9528842358 P.03/03
c1~
KEN jARCHO INSURANCE AGENCY, LLP
Phone (952) 884-2358
Fax (952) 884-0540
9052 Lyndale Avenue: South
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55420
Coverages for the 2001-2002 policy period have been renewed per the attached schedule
ofIimits and coverages.
The liquor stores are covered under a specialty program with St. Paul Companies for Off
Sale Liquor establishments.
Optional coverage maybe available for nO fault sewer back up the premium would be
approximately $2,720.00. If the City has an interest in seeing if this is available please let us
know. Thank you for the renewal business.
Kemleth Jarcho
TOTAL P.03
3
r.
- ,
.
.
.,
I'
.
.
NDV-21-2001 10:33
KEN JARCHO AGENCY LLP
,.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
NOVEMBER 2001
POI.I'CY ICOVERAGRS
9528842358 P.02/03
POLICY PERIOD fBEMIUM
CMC 21053 - League of Minnesota Cities 11/01/01 to 11/1/02
$5,266,647. Blanket on Buildings & Personal Property
$500. Deductible
457,108.. Mobile Equipment Scheduled - Over $25,000.
236,462. Mobile Equipment Unscheduled - Under $25,000.
$500. Deduotible
60,000. Extra Expense. City Hall
1,000,000. Commercial General Liability - $500. Deductible.
1,000,000. Public Officials Liability - $2,500. Deductible
Including Y2K Coverage
1,000,000. Business Auto Liability
Basic PIP
1,000,000. Uninsured & Underinsured Motorists
$500. Ded. Comprehensive - Per Schedule
$500. Ded. Collision - Per Schedule
15,000. Garagekeepers Coverage - $500. Deductible
MEL- 3810 League of Minnesota Cities
1,000,000. Umbrella
1111/01 to 11/1102
BKOI000486 81. Paul Companies 11/1/001 to 11/1102
Liquor Stores at
176,439. Special Form, Replacement Cost on Contents
23720 Highway 7, Shorewood, MN 55331
114,577. Special Form, Remplacement Cost On Contents
5681 Manitou Road, Shorewood, MN 55331
223,788. Special Fonn, Replacement Cost on Contents
19905 Highway 7, Shorewood, MN 55331
$500.00 Deductible
2
52,187.00
7,108.00
@
NDV-21-21001 110:34
KEN JARCHO AGENCY LLP
9528842358 P.103/103
\.
.,
^ .
Page -2-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
1,000.000.
500,000.
Commercial General Liability
General Aggregate
Each Occurrence
500,000.
Liquor Liability
Liability Limit
23720 Highway 7
19905 Highway 7
10.000.
10.000.
Money & Securities - Inside
Malley & Securities - Outside
8,581.00
.
1058982 United Fire & Casualty
100.000. Public Employees Bond
100.000. Depositor's Forgery
11/1/01 to 11/1/02 972.00
02-000276-20 League of Minnesota Cities
Workmen's Compensation &
Employer's Liability
11/1./01 to 11/1/02 15.117.00
1,000,000. Bodily Injury - Each Occurrence
1.000.000. Bodily Injury by Disease - Agreement Limit
906006-08506295-00 Auto Owners 11/1/01 to 1111102
64,832. Computer Equipment
Per Schedule
$500. Deductible
"'Does Not Include Pending changes
338.00*
.
(1)
TOTAL P.03
3
'.
~ ~
LMCIT LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM
, .
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
.
If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $300,000.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited
to $1,000,000. These statutory t01i limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases
the optional excess liability coverage.
.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single OCCUl1'ence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to $1,000,000., regardless of the number of claimants.
.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return
this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For fmiher information, contact LMCIT.
You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
The City of Shorewood accepts liability coverage limits of $1. 750.000. from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Tmst (LMCIT). *Incl udes 1M Excess
.
Check one:
The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established
by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
The city WAIVES-the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes
466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Signature
Position
Return this completedform to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103-2044
Page I of 1
r
..
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
.. .
"
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
November 20,2001
RE:
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers r
Bonnie Burton, Finance Director ~
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ~
Annual Certification of Assessments
TO:
FROM:
.
DiscussiOIJ
The City Code provides for annual certification of delinquent utility bills against the
respective properties served. A resolution is attached for City Council consideration
setting delinquent utility charges and other charges and fees to be certified to the County
as a levy on the property taxes. This resolution is considered and passed annually.
Council Action Requested
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution certifying delinquent
utility charges to the 2002 property tax rolls.
n
,",.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~3~
..
.J
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING DELINQUENT SEWER CHARGES, STORM WATER UTILITY
CHARGES, RECYCLING CHARGES, CITY CLEAN-UP CHARGES, DRY HYDRANT
CHARGES, AND SUMP PUMP CHARGES,
BE PLACED ON THE 2002 PROPERTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, Shorewood City Code provides for the City to place delinquent sanitary sewer
charges, storm water management utility charges, recycling charges, city clean-up charges, dry' hydrant
charges, and sump pum;J charges on the succeeding year property tax rolls for the specified properties;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has scheduled the consideration of the assessment of such charges
and has caused notice of such assessments to be mailed to the affected property owners; and,
WHEREAS, the Council has considered such charges at a regular council meeting and has made .
a determination that delinquent sanitary sewer charges, storm water management utility charges,
recycling charges, city clean-up charges, dry hydrant charges, and sump pump charges exist for the
specified properties set forth in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and F attached hereto and made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
That the Hennepin County Special Assessment Division is hereby authorized to place the
delinquent sanitary sewer charges, storm water management utility charges, recycling charges, city
clean-up ;, harges, dry hydrant charges, and sump pump charges, on the 2001 property tax rolls, payable
in 2002, at eight percent (8%) per annum, against the specified properties as set forth in Exhibits A, B, C,
D, E, and F.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood, Minnesota, this 26th day of
November, 2001.
.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
MUNIC CODE 26
EXHIBIT A
LEVY NO A
SANITARY SEWER
.
PIDNO. ADDN NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
25-117-23-31-0018 918.78 0892201550
25-117 -23-32-0023 299.75 0485205750
25-117 -23-34-0025 299.93 0270203450
25-117 -23-44-0049 361.98 0705053550
26-117 -23-11-0028 301.47 0435047400
26-117 -23-11-0044 299.93 0435046450
26-117-23-11-0050 301.47 0550211050
26-117 -23-14-0015 343.38 0375208200
26-117-23-14-0022 306.31 0385209400
26-117-23-14-0066 218.46 0285048300
26-117 -23-14-0087 402.94 0285049250
26-117 -23-14-0099 . 218.46 0550211950
26-117 -23-41-0013 298.94 0815050500
30-117 -23-33-0026 138.60 0255043700
30-117 -23-34-0002 315.10 0255045950
31-117-23-24-0007 218.46 0960280500
32-117-23-11-0014 402.94 0825256450
32-117 -23-12-0002 298.94 0330054550
32-117 -23-12-0008 297.92 0330054451
32-117 -23-12-0024 298.94 0605263950
32-117-23-13-0008 299.93 0330057750
32-117 -23-14-0026 196.94 0775257800
32 -117 -23-14-0040 297.92 0775258950
32-117 -23-14-0060 306.31 3778057550
32-117 -23-31-0013 297.92 0110059950
32-117 -23-31-0024 218.46 0775266750
32-117 -23-33-0033 128.10 3040268600
33-117 -23-13-0029 218.46 0155057050
33-117-23-21-0021 256.41 0320250800
33-117 -23-22-0014 601.20 0260055251/55551
33-117 -23-23-0028 291.51 0260057400
33-117 -23-23-0035 363.21 9775255750
33-117-23-24-0006 297.92 0775248600
33-117 -23-32-0031 297.92 0260058900
33-117 -23-43-0027 302.30 0935246500
33-117-23-44-0032 298.94 0940242150
34-117 -23-32-0014 298.94 0555058300
35-117 -23-34-0034 218.46 0450217400
35-117-23-42-0024 302.30 0145059600
36-11 7-23-14-0032 138.60 4889193050
36-117 -23-22-0024 306.31 0655204300
TOTAL LEVY NO A $ 12,480.76
.
.
-
MUNIC CODE 26 LEVY NO B
EXHIBIT A WATER
PIDNO. AD ON NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
32-117 -23-14-0060 295.24 3778057550
32 -117 -23-33-0033 64.95 3040268600
36-117 -23-14-0032 307.78 4889193050
TOTAL LEVY NO B $ 667.97
.
.
.
MUNIC CODE 26
EXHIBIT B
.
.
LEVY NO C
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
PIDNO. AD ON NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
25-117 -23-31-0018 56.09 0892201550
25-117 -23-32-0023 28.33 0485205750
25-117 -23-34-0025 15.77 0270203450
25-117 -23-44-0049 45.06 0705053550
26-117 -23-11-0028 15.19 0435047400
26-117 -23-11-0044 15.77 0435046450
26-117 -23-11-0050 15.19 0550211050
26-117 -23-14-0015 '16.00 0375208200
26-117 -23-14-0022 13.42 0385209400
26-117 -23-14-0066 9.57 0285048300
26-117 -23-14-0087 18.53 0285049250
26-117 -23-41-0013 22.53 0815050500
30-117 -23-33-0026 6.07 0255043700
30-117 -23-34-0002 13.80 0255045950
31-117 -23-24-0007 20.43 0960280500
32-117-23-11-0014 17.65 0825256450
32-117-23-12-0002 22.53 0330054550
32-117 -23-12-0008 29.30 0330054451
32-117 -23-12-0024 22.53 0605263950
32-117 -23-13-0008 15.77 0330057750
32-117 -23-14-0026 9.57 0775257800
32 -117 -23-14-0040 29.30 0775258950
32-117 -23-14-0060 19.17 3778057550
32-117 -23-31-0013 29.30 0110059950
32-117 -23-31-0024 20.43 0775266750
32-117 -23-33-0033 12.91 3040268600
33-117 -23-13-0029 9.57 0155057050
33~117-23-21-0021 19.78 0320250800
33-117-23-22-0014 22.58 0260055251/55551
33-117-23-23-0028 19.17 0260057400
33-117 -23-23-0035 25.84 9775255750
33-117 -23-24-0006 29.30 0775248600
33-117 -23-32-0031 29.30 0260058900
33-117 -23-43-0027 20.99 0935246500
33-117 -23-44-0032 22.53 0940242150
34-117-23-32-0014 22.53 0555058300
35-117 -23-34-0034 13.67 0450217400
35-117 -23-42-0024 20.99 0145059600
36-117-23-14-0032 6.07 4889193050
36-117 -23-22-0024 83.07 0655204300
TOTAL LEVY NO C $ 885.60
MUNIC CODE 26
EXHIBIT C
LEVY NO 0
RECYCLING
PIDNO. AD ON NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
25-117-23-31-0018 67.23 0892201550
25-117-23-32-0023 26.13 0485205750
25-11 7-23-34-0025 26.99 0270203450
25-117-23-44-0049 26.99 0705053550
26-117 -23-11 -0028 26.04 0435047400
26-117 -23-11-0044 26.99 0435046450
26-117 -23-11-0050 26.04 0550211050
26-117-23-14-0015 27.46 0375208200
26-117 -23-14-0022 22.98 0385209400
26-117 -23-14-0066 16.39 0285048300
26-117 -23-14-0087 39.02 0285049250
26-117-23-14-0099 9.57 0550211950
26-117 -23-41-0013 26.99 0815050500
30-117 -23-33-0026 10.40 0255043700
30-117-23-34-0002 30.23 0255045950
31-117-23-24-0007 22.98 0960280500
32-117-23-11-0014 30.23 0825256450
32-117-23-12-0002 26.99 0330054550
32-117-23-12-0008 26.99 0330054451
32-117 -23-12-0024 26.99 0605263950
32-117 -23-13-0008 26.99 0330057750
32-117 -23-14-0026 16.39 0775257800
32-117 -23-14-0040 26.99 0775258950
32-117-23-14-0060 22.98 3778057550
32-117 -23-31-0013 26.99 0110059950
32-117-23-31-0024 22.98 0775266750
32-117 -23-33-0033 15.49 3040268600
33-117-23-13-0029 16.39 0155057050
33-117 -23-21-0021 23.71 0320250800
33-117 -23-22-0014 53.98 0260055251/55551
33-117 -23-23-0028 22.98 0260057400
33-117 -23-24-0006 26.99 0775248600
33-117-23-32-0031 26.99 0260058900
33-117-23-43-0027 25.16 0935246500
33-117 -23-44-0032 26.99 0940242150
34-117 -23-32-0014 26.99 0555058300
35-117-23-34-0034 16.39 0450217400
35-117 -23-42-0024 25.16 0145059600
36-117-23-14-0032 10.40 4889193050
36-117-23-22-0024 30.23 0655204300
TOTAL LEVY NO 0 $ 1,034.80
.
.
MUNIC CODE 26 LEVY NO E
EXHIBIT D SUMP PUMP PENAL TV
PIDNO. AD ON NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
25-117-23-44-0049 1180.10 0705053550
TOTAL LEVY NO E $ 1,180.10
.
. .
.
.
MUNIC CODE 26
EXHIBIT E
LEVY NO F
CITY CLEAN-UP
PIDNO. ADDN NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
25-117 -23-31-0018 18.10 0892201550
25-117-23-32-0023 10.00 0485205750
25-117 -23-34-0025 10.00 0270203450
25-117 -23-44-0049 10.00 0705053550
26-117 -23-11-0028 10.00 0435047400
26-117 -23-11-0044 10.00 0435046450
26-117 -23-11-0050 10.00 0550211050
26-117 -23-14-0015 10.00 0375208200
26-117 -23-14-0022 .. -, . 10.00 0385209400
26-117 -23-14-0066 10.00 0285048300
26-117 -23-14-0087 18.10 0285049250
26~ 117 -23-14-0099 10.00 . 0550211950
26-117 -23-41-0013 10.00 0815050500
30-117-23-33-0026 10.00 0255043700
30-117-23-34-0002 10.00 0255045950
31-117-23-24-0007 10.00 0960280500
32-117-23-11-0014 10.00 0825256450
32-117-23-12-0002 10.00 0330054550
32-117-23-12-0008 10.00 0330054451
32-117-23-12-0024 10.00 0605263950
32-117-23-13-0008 10.00 0330057750
32-117-23-14-0026 10.00 0775257800
32-117 -23-14-0040 10.00 0775258950
32-117 -23-14-0060 10.00 3778057550
32-117-23-31-0013 10.00 0110059950
32-117-23-31-0024 10.00 0775266750
32-117 -23-33-0033 7.71 3040268600
33-117 -23-13-0029 10.00 0155057050
33-117-23-21-0021 10.00 0320250800
33-117 -23-22-0014 20.00 0260055251/55551
33-117-23-23-0028 10.00 0260057400
33-117-23-24-0006 10.00 0775248600
33-117-23-32-0031 10.00 0260058900
33-117-23-43-0027 10.00 0935246500
33-117-23-44-0032 10.00 0940242150
34-117 -23-32-0014 10.00 0555058300
35-117-23-34-0034 10.00 0450217400
35-117 -23-42-0024 10.00 0145059600
36-117 -23-14-0032 10.00 4889193050
36-117-23-22-0024 10.00 0655204300
TOTAL LEVY NO F $ 423.91
.
.
MUNIC CODE 26 LEVY NO G
EXHIBIT F DRY HYDRANT
PIDNO. ADDN NO. TOTAL PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT NO.
30-117-23-33-0026 34.65 0255043700
30-117 -23-34-0002 83.12 0255045950
TOTAL LEVY NO G $ 117.77
. ~.., , ....
.
,
.
'.'
IJ
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn,us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council cb
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator
November 21,2001
Transfer of Equipment with SLMPD
.
As related by Police Chief Litsey (see attached memorandum), the City of Shore wood purchased one
of the two snowmobiles used by the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD). The need
for snowmobile enforcement has dropped considerably in Shorewood since the City prohibited
snowmobiling on the Southwest LRT Regional Trail. The SLMPD has used and stored the
snowmobile; the City has not planned to use the snowmobile, nor has staff identified uses for it.
The SLMPD Coordinating Committee has concurred with the Chief's recommendation to:
. Request that the City of Shore wood transfer title of the snowmobile to the SLMPD at no cost
to the SLMPD;
. Sell the SLMPD's newer-model snowmobile; and
. Use the proceeds and other SLMPD equipment funds to purchase an all-terrain vehicle
(A TV).
.
The City would not receive the few thousand dollars expected from the sale or trade-in of the
snowmobile. It would, however, be responsible for paying 46 percent of funds these proceeds
represent toward the proposed purchase of the A TV.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authoriZe transfer of title for the 1997 Ski-Doo
Formula 500 snowmobile to the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department.
:#3D
ft
\,.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.,
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRYAN T. LITSEY"
Chief of Police
810 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-1913
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Craig Dawson, Shorewood City Administrator
FROM:
Bryan Litsey, Chief of Police
DATE:
November 12,2001- Monday
.
RE: Transfer of Ownership -Sh()rewo()<lSnowmobile
This is a follow-up to the Coordinating.c;oimnitteeMeetin$<1110ctober 10, 2001 when
the issue of Shorewood transferringo'X.J:?~r~l).m.~rtl1eir sn())'Vtp-obile to our police
department was discussed. ~.., part o~JPrtn()re~omBr~~ensiv~~lan to restructure our
vehicle fleet to include anA..UTeJC:ra~;\T e~ig~~((~ T\TJ<}l).a~~a.ttached a copy of the
memorandum I provided to~!9R~y~ij1at~~g<:f~~t~~~~~g.w~ing this subject. I would
appreciate you facilitating thenextst~p,in.thepr~~~~s;:wbichwould be formal action by
the Shorewood City Council approving theaforetnentiolledtransfer of ownership.
>.," ..:.-:,- -'-',:.:< "":',,..::. ,'":'.'. ,
Please do not hesitate to give me .acaIL~f you.need~Yfurther information and/or have .
any questions regarding this mattet'~
Copy to: Woody Love, Shorewood Mayor
Serving the South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior. Greenwood. Shorewood and Tonka Bay
..
,I
<Ai,
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRYAN T. LITSEY
ChIef of Police
810 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-1913
Office (952) 474-3261
Fax (952) 474-4477
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Greenwood Mayor Al Albrecht~ Coordinating Committee Chair
Tonka Bay Mayor Doug Kel1er~ Coordinating Committee Vice-Chair
Shorewood Mayor W oody Love~ Coordinating Committee Member
Excelsior Mayor Te[iHaugland~ Coord,:i.nating Committee Member
::~~i:':~::~~~;'~~~::~~C':..
.~ sposal. The City of
the Shorewood
and regulations on the
" hased out and
:railiJJ:::,;'dtewood. The other
;.;.",,~,~,j.. . '''', "
.<(,., \..... 'lyJunded through our police
,pbiling on the LRT trail was still
forcement was the desired
TO: ,
.
DATE:
RE:
:).' " .::', ':~:'" . "",':.:.
:. , ':, ~ .
Sale of Sno~b'b'ile4'iif~Jf~~e'()fATV
.....<,..:~..::::~,;:'.\~.:~:~> ~'.:..J ';._:~",", . , ," :'. ~': ~'.\ )"'::~
Our police department cu.::'
Shorewood purchased on'
Community Policing Offi
LRT Trail in their commw1l:
snowmobiling has been proh~ .
snowmobile~ which is the new. .
department along with donations.,
allowed and having two snowmoB
approach.
.
The need for snowmobile enforcement has dropped considerably since snowmobiling has
been prohibited on the LRT trail in Shorewood the last couple of seasons. This change
expanded the areas on the LR T trail that are closed to' snowmobiling in the region~ which
also include the portions of the LRT trail that run through the cities of Excelsior and
Greenwood. The snowmobiling that is done on the streets can normally be enforced with
squads, thus reducing our need even more to have two snowmobiles.
I am exploring the possibility that the City of Shorewood might be willing to transfer
ownership of their snowmobile and accessories to our police department. It is a 1997
Ski-Doo Formula 500, which has been set up as a police vehicle. If this were to occur,
Serving the South Lake Mlnnetonka Communltles of Excelsior. Greenwood. Shorewood and Tonka Bay
...
';
."
PAGE 2 - MEMORANDUM TO COORDINATING COMMITTEE
Sale of Snowmobile - Purchase of A TV
then I would advocate selling the snowmobile we currently own and using the proceeds
from that sale along with any supplemental funds needed from our Designated Vehicle
Fund to purchase an All Terrain Vehicle (ATV). I feel the snowmobile we own, which is
a 1999 Ski-Doo GT500, is the most salable being it is newer, larger and has not been set
up as a police vehicle yet.
An ATV offers more versatility than a snowmobile since it can be used during all
. seasons. For this reason, it would be an ideal vehicle to use for patrolling the LRT Trail,
city parks and other specialized needs. We would still have the use of a snowmobile,
which is important to have during the winter months. Nevertheless, the
snowmobile! A TV combination would be more of.an attribute to our agency than the .
current situation of no ATV and two snowmobiles.
I look forward to discussing this in more detail at the upcoming Coordinating Committee
Meeting on October 10, 2001.
i?~ .;
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator .. a~. ...
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works p
November 20,2001 ct> ~
TO:
FROM:
RE: Resolution Accepting Improvements for Eddy Station and Authorizing Final Payment
Engineering File 99-22
The contractor, CM Construction, Inc. for the Eddy Station project has finally submitted all of the
required documentation to accept the building and authorize final payment.
It should also be noted the CM Construction's performance on this project was terrific. The quality
of workmanship and project management was strong throughout the project. Final payment amounts
to $7,135.04.
.
Recommendation:
Staff is recommending approval of the resolution that accepts the Freeman Park Eddy Station facility
and authorizes final payment to eM Construction, Inc.
-:tt=3f
ft
\oJ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO 01-_
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING EDDY STATION, CITY PROJECT 99-22
AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has entered into a contract with cm
Construction, Inc. for City Project No. 99-22, for construction of the Freeman Park
multiuse building, known as Eddy Station; and,
WHEREAS, the Contractor has petitioned for final acceptance of the project and
final payment based on work performed to date; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made a final inspection of the project and
recommends acceptance and final payment be made by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
.
The City hereby does accept the work completed pursuant to said contract and authorizes
final payment to CM Construction in the amount of $7,13 5.04, and the one year guarantee
shall commence as of the date of this resolution, subject to the following items:
1. The Contractor must make satisfactory showing that he has complied with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding of State
Income Tax.
2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the Contractor
by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 26th day of
November, 2001. .
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn..us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrato~
. It V
Larry Brown, Director of Public works,
~ovember20,2001
TO:
FROM:
RE: A Motion Authorizing Expenditure of Funds for Computer Workstation
I am pleased to report that Mr. Boyd Bailey accepted employment as the Engineering Technician,
and started work on ~ovember 13th. As the Engineering Technician, Mr. Bailey will be responsible
for the generation and updating of city base maps, utility record drawings and GIS systems.
Currently, there is not a computer for Mr. Bailey. As such, Staff has sought quotations from two
firms for the machines specified. Since this workstation will be utilizing GIS systems, cad systems,
and plotting of drawings, this machine needs to be a high-end workstation.
.
Dell online services provided the low quote for an amount of$1,977.50. This will be funded through
the engineering operating budget. Review of the budget indicates that the fund will support this
purchase.
Recommendation:
Staff is recommending that a motion be approved authorizing the expenditure of funds for the
computer purchases outlined herein.
=1f3F
ft
t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
:0
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us · cityhall@cl.shorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
21 November 2001
RE:
Kramer, Leroy - Appeal Notice to Remove
FILE NO.
Property (4475 Enchanted Lane)
Mr. Leroy Kramer has appealed for additional time (Exhibit A - request letter, dated 19
November 2001) to comply with a Notice to Remove that was sent to him (Exhibit B).
Although he asks for 30 - 60 days to comply, the Council's practice has been to allow 30
days for compliance, after which Public Works is directed to clean up the property at the
owner's expense. It is recommended that Mr. Kramer be given unti126 December 2001
. to comply.
If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me pdor
to Monday night's meeting.
Cc:
n
'-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#34
4
.. .... C11?..~._..61?.'*.J...A);-~1 s~':-!j .... .. .. ..m..... ....
._..U' ..........-............ '''-'J\:-'' .......-..--........... . . ....-..... -' ....-........ ...... b''''''
..... ... .J:-. ~._ R I ",,-~_J ~G:-j -. lJ u.. .:J..o.~u /.:7 () . 1'1 '7
?'t~~ ~:;... (I.N o....-r... __ ~.._.~.t?..~~. uJ.P..gJ5~.S.__ .. .I.?_.~~.~~
." ~ 0... f-~.~.Q.~...~._...a t:&.~ :?~: /J_~.... ..>.. ~!?~. t?J..~c.~J.
-" . ...... ..-.................-.... ..;;(1...... ... -... .............-...--.-..... ......... ...' ...... . ...... ...........-.....- ......
. . ____ 7 hlf ",]L 7 be/' . ...
~:~:~_.__~~~ol~~:s~~~~i'~h~.~.-.... ....... .... ...
___..,___. ..... _.. __....___.._-_.--... .-.{!jo ...~.~-~-.-...{!)~--~-~_...~._........--.. ..... ..-....-..------..-..--.........
.~~=:=l~-;~=-El-ii~~-:!f7:~J.~j~9:;.~=:::-
.._.,_.~_.._ ......._._....._._..__..___ .._....,._..__..__.___......_ ....._... ..__.___._..___"___,_ .._..,_._.__ fiM._.__.__h_ ._._._.___._..H___..._ ,,_"__""___' .... '"." _.. OM'
-. ._~.
. ....._ _..___.______.___0.__..__.__...__..____...__ ...... __...._ ..........._.____...._..___...____..._._......__..... _' _-_.... .._...__.-.- .........",-_....., ..... ..-..-----.
----..---.., w,_._
............. . --- ---....-----....----...-......--.-.. ....-.. .....-.. .. .- -....- ......_. . .....-....------ ....-.-..-.-........... .....-............. ...-... .-.-..--.... ..............
.... ....... ....--..--
.. ___.... _~ .__._.__....___..~ ..... __. ._w.__ ....._.. ~...~__.u. _.... _. .._ .._.'_....._.w_ ,._ ....._.__.. ___..M.. .__M'__ ,._.... _.. ___'_".' w....__... ---...-.,..,-..-."
........- ._..~.. . . '." .... --...--....-....
..w. ...........W.._M.._.._..._._...._.........._......_.'._~__........w_...... ..' 'M'_.' .._.~__.__._____.... . ._.__......_.....__._~w_......,......_ ._....N._..._........ ........
.-..-.----...~._--.-.......-..._.._..
. .._......._.._..N... "'N . _._...... .... ...._.. .......~.. ._... _..._~ ."':......_.__w__.. .. _....__..._.._ ......____._....._._.__..__...._....__.._..... ,_....____......,'. ,.'
...- '-. ..... .--.-....-.... '..... .,.. w. ...'_......._..~....N
..... - .._- "', ....---.-,.---.--...."---..- ...-". .. .'---. ,.---....,......-..-
___..,._._ .. .....__.. ....._.'_ ____.. ...._...._.w'_.._.__._..__..~........,....,_.._._.....'w_. ..-,---..-.....-.-.-
.. .. ..._... _.... .... ..._... _ .. .. .' __.._wOO,.'. ... ...,...._ ..,. . _ .,..._..... _.."..... .__. ,_...._......,..__._._..._._ .... .___w____..,._.MH _.._........'.. ._.~ ,_,,_
.... .,. ..-.....-.- ..... ,.....-' ....,....H....._......'......_...
. .. ,.._...__ .H...._.. '_' ...... ._..__._,___._......,._.._......_.._......_...' ._'w" ...... _,__. ...,.__....." ...'_,_,.....~w~... ..... ,...._.....,. ...- .._.w_a......n
H'N." ... .'_ ~~ ...,..,_.._r_O' ._,-' .
.........__.........._......._....................._ ......- .-......-.--.-.-.-......... ......._- -.._...--..~h~~..b~T ~
.........
c
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood,mn.us. cityhall@ci,shorewood.mn.us
DATB: 9 November 2001
TO: Leroy A. Kramer
4475 Enchanted Lane
Shorewood, MN 55364
.
PROPERTY LOCATION: 4475 Enchanted Lane
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: 30-117-23-33-0005
NOTICE TO REMOVE
Offensive and Unhealthy Substances
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there exists a condition on the above referenced property
which is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 of the Shorewood City Code, a copy of
which Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes, but is
not limited to the following:
UNLICENSED AND/OR INbPERABLE VEmCLES OR EQUIPMENT:
.
Snowmobile, Lic. No. CK4108 (01) - expired.
Dodge pickup truck - no license
Trailer, Lie. No. 648 356 (99) - expired
Nissan pickup truck, Lic. No. DTZ 292 (Oct.Ol) - expired
Boat trailer, Lie. No. S14 130 (97) - expired
Boat trailer - no license
OTHERl
Pallets, pipes, gutters, fencing, lumber, conduit, reinforcing rods, generators,
equipment soil bucket, blocks, cart, mower parts, timbers, batteries, pails, mats,
. sand bags, twenty-five plus (25+) tires, wheel rims, siding, wire cage, tables, heating
grills, plywood, foam insulation, barrel, logs, ski-jet body, posts, dock parts, swing
set frame, shower stall, and similar miscellaneous. .
You are hereby required to remove the above-described matter and any other offensive matter
located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 within ten (10) days from
the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City
Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the City Council.
lof2
#9t
~" PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
"#\
'. '.
""
.
.
If you do not respond to this Notice within ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as
may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such
removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lien against the property.
*** PLEASE GIVE TIDS MATTER YOUR IMl\1EDIATE ATTENTION ***
BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL
2of2
I
t
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
DRAFT
Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7 :30 P.M.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Chair Arnst; Commissioners Dallman, Meyer, Young, Puzak, and Bix; City Council
Liaison Garfunkel
Absent:
Commissioner Callies and City Engineer Brown
B.
Review Agenda
.
Chair Arnst pulled item #4B under Reports, since Commissioner Callies was not present.
puzak moved, Young seconded, approving the Agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
Commissioner Bix arrived at 7:31 P.M.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of October 23, 2001
Puzak moved, Dallman seconded to approve the Minutes of October 23, 2001 as presented. Motion
passed 6/0.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
. There were none.
4. REPORTS
A. Report on City Council Meeting of October 5, 2001
Liaison Garfunkel reported on three key items from the meeting. First, he indicated that the Council gave
approval for the preliminary design for the Highway 19, Smithtown Road intersection. This will be in front
of the Tonka Bay City Council at their next meeting for approval.
Second, the Council approved in concept the combination of the police and fire facility. A few issues are yet
to be determined, but the concept was approved.
Finally, the Council accepted the WSB feasibility study on Smithtown Road. The reclamation process will be
paid for with MSA Funds and will allow for a 2-foot and 4 foot shoulder on either side. He continued that a
drain tile system would be installed as a part of the process and that they hope to complete the job in the
spring of 2002. While right of way issues are still open, recommendations will be made by Attorney Keane to
j:/: 10 4
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13,2001
Page 2 of 4
I
.
get those behind us.
B. Report on Land Conservation Environment Committee
Report was removed in Commissioner Callies absence.
5. DISCUSSION ON LAKE LINDEN TRAIL WALK AND RECOMMENDATION TO
CITY COUNCIL TO CONDUCT A FEASffiILITY REPORT.
Chair Arnst felt the trail walk was successful. Five neighbors accompanied the Commission throughout. The
neighbors seemed very receptive to pursue the trail. With that in mind, Chair Arnst asked the Commission to
make a recommendation to Council that WSB carry out a feasibility report to present to Council.
Young asked if any new feedback from the neighbors had been heard since the trail walk. Chair Arnst
indicated that no new feedback had been received, and that the affected neighbors were notified and present
for the walk.
Dallman moved, Meyer seconded, recommending to Council that WSB conduct a feasibility report.
.
Puzak asked for further discussion and had several questions regarding the trail and the feasibility report. The
first question he posed was who would pay for the feasibility report. He wondered whether it came out of
Parks budget or the general fund. Secondly, tied to that, he questioned how much it would cost. Puzak
maintained that he was uncomfortable recommending something without knowing the cost. Chair Arnst
indicated that these were valid questions which she could not answer, and with no staff person present they
would remain unanswered for the present time. Young asked if the recommendation could be delayed until a
staff person was present at the next meeting in December. Chair Arnst asked Garfunkel if he knew where the
funds for the feasibility report came from. Garfunkel was not sure, however, believed the monies come out of
the trail or general fund.
The third question Puzak posed was what the future of Yellowstone offered for further trails. He indicated
that it is unknown to him whether this 2 112-block trail will connect anywhere or just stand alone. Dallman
suggested waiting for Brown to give the Commission a cost estimate before moving forward on this segment,
as well as, a larger segment along Yellowstone. Meyer pointed out that the one end of the trail could connect
to the shopping center along Highway 7, eventually.
.
Chair Arnst pointed out that many of the trails and pieces are coming together in various locations, even
connecting communities. Chair Arnst maintained that since we have the support of the neighbors and Council
has asked us to analyze this segment, she would like to move forward on this segment. She argued, that going
any further would be contrary to our process, we would not have talked to any of the neighbors and they may
interpret our actions unfavorably. On the other hand, the neighbors along Yellowstone may see this shorter
trail segment and ask why it stops and whether they can have it extended. Bix and Meyer agreed.
Young indicated while he was inclined to go forward, he was still curious about the costs. Dallman pointed
out that Brown has said all along this is the way to go. Dallman believed the Commission should follow his
earlier recommendations and take the next step.
Motion passed 5/1, with Puzak dissenting.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13,2001
"'. Page 3 of 4
6. MASTER PLAN REVIEW - STEP 2
Chair Arnst asked to discuss item B first.
B. Discuss Commission Changes/Revisions to Cathcart, Badger, Manor.
Chair Arnst asked for any additions or corrections to her Master Plan Review Park Summaries included in the
packet.
Bix had comments regarding Cathcart Park and the tree line that runs along the edge of the ball field.
Recently, she observed the park and felt the trees were a lovely addition. From her observations, she believed
that the trees did not really cause the shade problem referred to in earlier discussions, and she would not
support cutting them down or trimming them greatly. Puzak maintained that his concern with the trees is a
safety issue. Since they are located near the ball field and offer no warning track he is afraid someone may
run into one.
.
Chair Arnst suggested adding the installation of a warning track before the tree line to the recommendations
or considerations segment of the master plan review. Meyer inquired whether the entire segment should be
renamed "considerations" vs. "recommendations". Chair Arnst agreed and will change the title of the
segment throughout.
Chair Arnst also learned that the Park, although located within the Chanhassen boundary, belongs to
Shorewood. According to a 1973 agreement, Shorewood maintains and owns the park, thus, she will remove
Property Ownership from the recommendations section.
A. Silverwood Park
1. The current emphasis of the Park.
.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Playground
Slide
Sliding Hill
Free Skate on the Pond
2. Population it serves.
a. Currently families with young children
3. What are the deficiencies of service. population or opportunity.
a. Practice tennis courts are shabby
b. Investigate the trail walkway
4. Recommended Changes, Refinements, Refocus of the Park.
a. Consider replacing practice courts with painted soccer net or
magic square and hopscotch
b. Consider adding a warming house for the free skaters
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13,2001
Page 4 of 4
j
~..
Chair Arnst opened the Silverwood Park Master Plan for discussion and review. Everyone agreed this park is
a wonderful small neighborhood park, utilized by young children and their families. Young noted that the
practice tennis courts are extremely shabby and wondered if they ever got used. Chair Arnst remembered that
long ago a group approached the City to replace them with a painted soccer net with zones for practice or a
roller hockey practice court. Which had been denied. Meyer questioned the rationale behind the denial, and
believed the soccer net idea to be legitimate.
Chair Arnst then pointed out that this park contains one of the only sliding hills offered in Shorewood. Puzak
felt this park was a "baby stroller magnet" and served this group well. He complimented the developer for
turning this virtually unusable piece of land into a strikingly successful park.
Chair Arnst shared that there is also a trail system that accesses this park along the back half of the properties,
which is owned by the City. The trail was part of the initial design, however, the developer did not build it
from the beginning and once people were in they liked their privacy and fought to oppose it's constlUction
after the fact. The City has had it surveyed and marked and continues to watch for encroachment issues. It
was suggested they include the trail walk as a part of the spring park tours to remind neighbors that it is
owned by the City.
.
Young suggested usage of the backboard be determined and recommended that the court either be resurfaced
or replaced. Dallman proposed a hopscotch or magic square be put there. While Meyer also advocated a
soccer practice net be painted. It was also brought up that they consider adding a warming house to the park
for the pond free skate area in the future.
7. NEW BUSINESS
Chair Arnst indicated there would be no second meeting in November.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Dallman moved, Bix seconded, adjourning the Regular Park Commission Meeting of
November 13,2001 at 8:25 P.M. Motion passed 6/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.
Kristi B. Anderson
RECORDING SECRETARY
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~
November 20, 2001
TO:
FROM:
RE: A Motion Authorizing the Preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Lake Linden
Drive Trail Project.
On November 3rd, the Park Commission and members of the City Council conducted a trail walk
along Lake Linden Drive. This was precipitated by feedback from residents of the area requesting
that the City investigate a trail along Lake Linden Drive to facilitate safe pedestrian travel.
While only five residents attended the trail walk, all were amenable to the presence of a trail along
their property.
.
On November 13th, 2001 the Park Commission passed a motion recommending that the City Council
adopt a motion directing WSB and Associates to prepare a feasibility study for the Lake Linden
Drive
Trail Project.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that. the City Council adopt a motion directing WSB and Associates to prepare a
feasibility study for the Lake Linden Drive Trail Project. The City Engineer is to report back with all
due speed once the report has been drafted.
=tt:/'/3
#.
t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2001
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 P;M.
Present:
Chair Bailey; Commissioners, Borkon, Gagne, Packard, Pisula, White, and Woodruff;
Council Liaison Lizee, Engineer Brown and Planning Director Nielsen
Absent:
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
.
. October 16, 2001
Gagne moved, Packard seconded, approving the October 16, 2001, Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes as presented. Motion passed 6/0/1, with Bailey abstaining due to his absence at that
meeting.
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CODE AMENDMENT...; ESTABLISH A C.U.P
PROCESS FOR COMMERCIAL HOURS OF OPERATION AND
LANDSCAPING/SCREENING REOUIREMENTS
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:02 P.M. and briefly reviewed the procedures utilized in the
Public Hearing process. Any items recommended for approval would appear on the November 26,2001,
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for consideration and review.
.
The Planning Commission decided to review the zoning code amendment information as two separate
matters, noting the Commercial Hours of Operation would be considered first.
Director Nielsen explained the history for consideration of a zoning code amendment establishing a
Conditional Use Permit process for Commercial Hours of Operation within the City of Shorewood. He
noted in the past, the Commission had limited authority regarding issues of regulation for twenty-four
hour operations. Director Nielsen presented a draft regulation that had been reviewed by the City
Attorney. This regulation defined Twenty-four Hour Uses as:
Any commercial use, except those businesses with a valid bar, wine, or intoxicating liquor
license, that is regularly open for business or involves other significant, outdoor activity during
any hour between ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M.
Director Nielsen then reviewed the proposed regulations pertaining to business hours found in Zoning
Code Section 1201.03, Subd. 2t. These regulations contained restrictions pertaining to off-street loading,
movement of many vehicles, including delivery vehicles, outdoor speaker systems or public address
systems, and lighting. Director Nielsen stated the City Attorney had reviewed this draft regulation and
noted conditions to be reasonable and enforceable. In addition, the Commission noted few properties that
would be affected by these regulations, however, the gas station to the north of City Hall would certainly
qualify for consideration should there be cause for any additional permits in the future. Until such a time
existed, that property, and other relevant properties, would be "grandfathered in " regarding these
proposed regulations.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 30, 2001
Page 2of8
".
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:09 P.M.
In response to Commissioner Gagne's question, Director Nielsen explained that many gas stations, such
as the Holiday station on Old Market Road, would be operating without violation of this proposed
regulation until future approval was requested through the City permitting process.
PisuIa moved, Borkon seconded, recommending approval of the draft regulation pertaining to
twenty-four (24) hour use, subject to recommended changes made this evening. Motion passed 7/0.
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing related to screening and landscaping requirements.
Director Nielsen explained there had been consensus from Staff, Commission and Council, that certain
aspects of Shorewood' s development regulations regarding screening and landscaping were in need of
updating. He noted the Zoning Code pertaining to these issues had not been updated in over 15 years, and
was inadequate in the areas of scope, specifications, design, maintenance, security, parking lot
landscaping, and submission requirements. Further, he explained the suggested landscaping/screening .
provisions applied to General Residential as well as Semi-Public and Income-Producing Property Uses in
the City.
Chair Bailey opened, and hearing no requests from the audience to speak on this issue, closed the Public
Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:28 P.M.
After a brief discussion regarding the concern for enforcement of such requirements, and clarification
pertaining to the Nurseryman's Industry Standards for tree height and size, the Commission reached
agreement on this issue. Director Nielsen noted a draft ordinance of these proposed requirements will be
presented at the November 20,2001, Planning Commission meeting.
2. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - TRITCH ESTATES
Applicant: Dave Alan .
Location: 6060 Strawberry Lane and adjoining lots
Chair Bailey opened the Public Hearing at 7:42 P.M.
.
Director Nielsen presented information from a report regarding File No. 405(00.35), referencing Tritch
Estates, dated October 23,2001. He then explained Mr. Tom Tritch had submitted an application for a
preliminary plat of approximately 2.9 acres of land located at 6060 Strawberry Lane. The Planning
Commission had tabled that request pending resolution of a number of items described in the December
28, 2000, staff report regarding this matter. The owners of the property had now agreed to sell the
property to Mr. Dave Alan, Inc., acting as buyer, subject to receiving approval of the subdivision of the
property. The buyer had submitted a revised preliminary plat for the property. Background information
for this request was contained in an earlier attached staff report, dated December 28,2001, and was used
as the basis for review.
Director Nielsen then reviewed recommendations pertaining to Street Right-of-Way, Lot Area and Width,
Drainage and Utility Easements, Plat Name, Tree Preservation & Reforestation, Lot Numbering, the
Existing House, City Property as well as issues of Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. The Grading,
Drainage, and Utilities required further consideration, as soil information and a grading plan were
considered critical to the approval of the plan. In addition, he noted there were concerns for demolition
plans of the existing house, and payment for the City property included in the plat. Also, final plans
needed to include a tree preservation and reforestation plan. He stated Engineer Brown was in attendance
this evening to review the engineering concerns for the site.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
I October 30, 2001
Page 3 of8
Engineer Brown provided background on the geography of the site, noting the property existed currently
as three lots with one single-family dwelling and two accessory structures near the northeast corner of the
site. He noted Mr. Tritch had submitted a preliminary plat to subdivide the parcel into 6 single-family
lots. Topography was very flat with I foot of relief across the site. He then reviewed concerns regarding
right-of-ways and easements. He explained the easterly four lots abut, and would directly access
Strawberry Lane. Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 would have public access via the Church Road cul-de-sac.
Engineer Brown also explained the City's subdivision standards required residential streets to have a
minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet, with 25 feet being obtained from both sides of the right-of-way
centerline. The plat was in conformance with this requirement, except for Lot 3 Block 1. While the
proposed combination of widths from the right-of-way centerline in that area totaled 50 feet, it did not
lend itself to a straight roadway alignment. Therefore, a 25-foot minimum right-of-way width was
recommended, thus, allowing alignment to remain should construction need to take place on Strawben'y
Lane in the future.
.
In accordance with the City's Water Implementation Plan, a 12-inch diameter watermain was to be
extended along Strawberry Lane, as development permitted to provide municipal water service to the site
within the Maple Avenue right-of-way. He noted the recommended 25-foot minimum right-of-way
combined with the standard 10-foot drainage and utility easement was adequate for the installation and
maintenance of this utility. He noted the sanitary sewer service provided issues for the development of
the site as the sewer main was quite deep, and only one single-service line extended from the main to the
right-of-way line. Due to the excessive depth of this utility, consideration of a lateral main should be
given to service these lots. Also, he recommended the sanitary sewer within Maple A venue be extended
to the boulevard area of the Church Road cul-de-sac.
.
With regard to grading and drainage, Engineer Brown explained, the site was very flat. While this might
minimize the site alteration necessary, the slow grade created significant drainage issues for the entire
site. The City's Stormwater Management Plan required calculation of rate retention. Therefore, the
applicant's engineer was required to provide grading and hydraulic calculations that maintained the
predeveloped runoff rate, and met requirements for the 100-year frequency event. In addition, the
applicant would be required to provide adequate soil borings that clearly documented current groundwater
levels, or indications of past dynamic groundwater levels for the site. Once elevations of groundwater
were documented, the lowest floor elevations would need to be coordinated and shown on the final
grading plans for the subject site.
Mr. Dave Alan, applicant for 6060 Strawberry Lane and adjoining lots, stated he agreed with the
recommendations made by Director 'Nielsen and Engineer Brown and planned to follow those
recommendations to move the project forward.
Mr. Mark Morford, 6150 Church Road, expressed concern for drainage in that area. Engineer Brown
encouraged Mr. Morford to meet with him to discuss those concerns at a later date.
Ms. Barbara Toothman, 4350 Trent Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota, stated there would be no construction on
Lots 1 and 2 as her brother owned those lots, and there were no plans for building at this time.
Engineer Brown reminded all parties involved that if the proposed plat was approved, public
improvements would be installed in accordance with the plat.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 8:03 P.M.
Commissioner White questioned whether it was possible to save the large trees on the site. Mr. Alan
responded his firm had a history of attempting to preserve large trees if possible, however, he was not
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 30, 2001
Page 4 of8
anticipating many trees being able to be preserved in this case as a result of the grading and drainage
areas of concern.
Chair Bailey re-opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 8:04 P.M.
Mr. Butch Zelinski, 320 Turner Road, Orono, Minnesota, stated his firm wanted to build great houses on
wooded lots, however, compliance with the engineering aspects of drainage would need to take place
before any trees could be preserved.
Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony p0l1ion of the Public Hearing at 8: 10 P.M.
Commissioner Borkon stated she had concerns about the details of the plat still requiring resolution and
would like to see ~he final plat prior to review by the City Council.
Engineer Brown commented, in response to Commissioner Borkon's question, the drainage on the site
would be challenging, and the developer would need to balance all necessary building requirements in
order to comply with regulations.
.
Gagne moved, Borkon seconded, recommending approval of the preliminary plat, subject to Staff
recommendations, and review of the final plat prior to Council consideration. Motion passed 7/0.
3. PREAPPLICATION PHASE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
RE: PROPOSAL FOR CUB FOODS STORE
Applicant: John Uban, DSU, Inc.
Location: Shorewood Village Shopping Center, 23680 Highway 7
Director Nielsen explained representatives of CUB Foods had submitted a proposal to expand the
Shorewood Village Shopping Center to include a new CUB Foods grocery store in May of this year. At
that time, the application submitted involved an amendment to the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan, a
rezoning, conditional use permits, and variances. Following a public hearing and a negative
recommendation from the Planning Commission, CUB withdrew its application before it was considered
by the City Council.
The owners of the Shopping Center had now hired the planning consulting firm of Dahlgren, Shardlow, .
and Uban, Inc. (DSU) to submit a revised proposal for the project. This proposal included the need for a
preapplication phase of Shorewood' s Comprehensive Plan amendment process, requesting the land use
designation of the property at 6095 Lake Linden Drive be changed from "Low to Medium Residential" to
"Commercial" .
Director Nielsen then explained Shorewood had established a two-step process for consideration of
proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan: 1) preapplication; and 2) formal application. The
preapplication phase of this process was intended to allow an applicant to meet with City officials on an
informal basis to explain the proposal. City officials then should identify any issues needing to be
addressed and what additional information might be required as part of any further review. No formal
decision would be made at this stage, and the applicant needed enough information to determine whether
a formal application would be worth pursuing.
Numerous issues were identified in the previous application, and attempts had been made to resolve those
issues as part of the revised application. Director Nielsen also explained issues of drainage, traffic,
landscaping/buffering, 24-hour operation, Shoreland District overlay, and size/character of the proposed
structure were of significant concern in the previous application.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
'. October 30,2001
Page 5 of8
.
.
With favorable consideration, the next steps in the process would include consideration of a formal
Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, and any other zoning actions that may be
necessary. With willingness to proceed shown by the applicant, the preapplication would appear on the
November 26,2001, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda for consideration with possible formal
application planned for January or February of 2002.
Director Nielsen then noted Mr. John Uban was in the audience and would like to address the
Commission this evening on behalf of Mr. Stan Taube, owner of the Shorewood Village Shopping
Center.
Mr. Taube stated upon reflection of the past application, the Planning Commission had been COlTect in its
recommendations. As a result, he had hired the DSU consulting firm in effort to resolve some of the
issues of concern. He stated he had tried to listen, address, and improve the plans from the previous
application.
Mr. Uban, consulting land planner for DSU, Inc., stated he was involved in the project in effort to address
the areas of concern. He explained the firm had started over in the project and made changes in trying to
eliminate all variances, and meet requirements as requested. He explained the overall design being
prese,nted this evening had decreased from the original application. He also stated this was the smallest
new store CUB Foods would be considering for the site. With regard to the residential zoning change to
commercial, Mr. Uban stated CUB Foods wanted the proposed store to be attached to the existing
Shopping Center. The site being requested for rezoning was 0.7 acres with approximately 40-45% open
space remaining as green space. Only a corner of that acreage would be taken up by the CUB store and
parking spaces. He stated he thought this would be much preferred with additional berming around the
site. In addition, he explained the overall site had been assembled to make the overall commercial pattern
work better for the community. Issues of ponding had been examined and innovative underground
drainage had been proposed. A second traffic study had been prepared with issues of traffic calming
measures being proposed to help offset the anticipated increase in traffic. He noted this proposal tried to
help screen and soften the edge of the building facing the residential areas. In addition, evergreens could
be planted in neighboring yards. He stated a meeting would be planned with the neighbors on Lake
Linden Drive to hear concerns prior to meeting with the City Council. He then introduced Mr. Ron
Krank, of KKE Architecture.
Mr. Krank stated he had begun working on the project in July of this year to address concerns from the
owner regarding the proposed building's size and character. He encouraged the Commission to visit the
Rosemount, Minnesota, CUB Foods store as he had used it as an example for this store's architectural
design. He noted the fa~ade treatment had been reduced and changed to incorporate more visual interest
than in previous proposals in effort to create a village concept or character for the store.
Mr. Gordon Ferrington, Vice-President of CUB Foods West, explained CUB Foods had originated in the
Twin Cities 33 years ago. Since that time, CUB Foods had constantly been changing the store design and
layout to fit the needs of its consumer. He then reviewed the "split store" layout, noting that it appeared
to act as a store within a store. He also noted the store was very "user friendly" and included a pharmacy,
and in-store bank. He stated the delivery bays were planned for loading at the back of the store with a
sawtooth design for parking. He also commented the produce would be on one side of the store, and the
checkouts at the front of the store, so a shopper could quickly maneuver the store and depart efficiently.
Chair Bailey stated the Commission appreciated all efforts made to address concerns, and he thought the
presentation of new information well done.
Commissioner Pisula then asked Mr. Taube why he thought this property required a CUB Foods store as
opposed to some other smaller retailer. Mr. Taube responded there was a market for a warehouse style
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 30, 2001
Page 6 of 8
.
\.1
store, such as CUB Foods, in this area. He stated Driskill's was not able to be competitive, and a store
was needed that offered more to the consumer. CUB Foods was interested and had improved its proposal.
He noted this was the latest generation of grocery stores to include a series of groceries within a store.
Commissioner Pisula state he could see the logic behind this plan, but asked that attention be paid to the
neighbors comprised of people in Shorewood that considered a smaller store to have value. Mr. Taube
stated he was also a Shorewood resident, but the site was a regional site also serving other communities.
He thought he had a responsibility to provide service to all regional communities in addition to
Shorewood. Commissioner Pisula stated he appreciated the efforts made in terms of improving the
externalities on the site.
Commissioner Borkon stated she had a number of questions, noting she appreciated the great presentation
and time spent in explanation this evening. She then questioned Director Nielsen and Engineer Brown as
to the accuracy of the designation label of the intersection near the store with regard to the newly
submitted traffic study. Engineer Brown stated any time additional trips per day were added to an
intersection there would be concern. However, the improvements being proposed would help as well as a
new signal system that would be in place next spring. He did not believe any potential increase in
accidents could be attributed to CUB Foods directly, as he believed the site would develop regardless of
whether CUB Foods occupied the site, and the traffic increase of 6% was considered minimal by industry .
standards. He also anticipated peak periods of traffic would generate the increase rather than traffic being
spread evenly throughout the day to explain the increase. In addition, he stated the City had made
significant efforts to minimize traffic on the already overworked collector roads in that area. He viewed
the traffic issue as a balancing act that the applicant would have to work with in the proposal.
Commissioner Gagne thanked the applicant for the information presented this evening. He stated he had
real concerns regarding changing the Comprehensive Plan as a general rule. He questioned whether the
store could be built without the 0.7 acres and rezoning. Mr. Uban stated, without the additional acreage
the CUB Foods store could not exist on the site. In addition, the CUB Foods store would provide a
grocery anchor that would help to make the tenants of the Shopping Center more prosperous. He noted
the City's Comprehensive Plan encouraged upgrading of potential commercial areas, and this proposal
was trying to do that. Also, to be able to orient the entire Center to the south attempted to minimize the
impact upon the three houses facing the Center.
Mr. Taube stated he was trying to make the development work and function nicely by balancing all .
aspects, including proper landscaping efforts. He could propose other options, but those options would
not work as well and still protect the people in the immediate area.
Commissioner Pisula commented he appreciated the efforts to keep the current tenants and not remove
them in order to enlarge the Center. He then asked for an explanation of the traffic pattern study as it
related to trade areas. He also stated there were significant concerns remaining regarding the traffic to
and from the site. He noted a store of less magnitude would decrease the potential traffic and would still
continue to serve the people ofthe community. He asked why there had been no discussion of utilizing a
County Market format in this site, as it was also owned by Supervalu.
Ms. Mary McGlynch, CUB Foods Real Estate Manager, explained that County Market stores were
individually owned stores and not part of the CUB corporate format. She noted that this property still had
the potential for corporate opportunity. Mr. Ferrington also commented this proposed CUB Foods store
had been downsized as much as possible. He stated consumers want more, but to drive less.
Commissioner Packard questioned whether the additional acreage would be needed if the pharmacy
would be removed. Mr. Ferrington stated all the CUB Foods stores had a pharmacy within the store as
consumers wanted to be able to "one-stop shop".
.
'" Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
. , October 30, 2001
Page 7 of 8
Commissioner White questioned Engineer Brown as to whether the detention pond on the south side of
Highway 7 would accommodate any additional drainage from this site. Engineer Brown explained that
pond accommodated all currently proposed and accepted site plans, but would not support the additional
drainage from this proposal. He further noted the applicant would need to meet predeveloped runoff rates
as part of the application process, and as such, it appeared the engineering regarding the proposed
underground drainage would be adequate.
Commissioner Woodruff expressed concern in that the City had typically tried to buffer residential areas
from commercial zoning areas by utilizing a higher density residential zoning area. She stated she was
concerned for the proposed buffer and thought it needed to be done properly in this case. In addition, she
stated while the proposed plan was greatly improved from the original, the proposed plan need to make it
so the people living next door would be as happy as the people living five miles away from the site.
.
Chair Bailey stated, upon review of this application, specifically the area detailing how the proposal
would comply with the Comprehensive Plan's land use policies; he thought all areas of concem seemed to
arise from the issue of neighborhood versus community scale. While he thought the proposal had been
greatly improved, there were still key items of concem needing to be addressed before he could support
the project.
Mr. Uban thanked the Commission for its time spent in review of this matter. He stated the applicant was
very serious about making this a successful center, and the Shopping Center needed a successful strong
grocery anchor to thrive. Impacts would need to be mitigated to balance and succeed. He stated there
would be a neighborhood meeting before the City Council Meeting in late November of this year as the
applicant team wanted to listen and try to resolve issues with area residents. He noted it wouldn't be
possible to mitigate all concerns entirely, however, best attempts were being made to answer all concems.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor presented this evening.
5. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA
. Director Nielsen stated a draft ordinance regarding the landscaping zoning code amendment, discussion
of a subdivision ordinance, and review of various Planning Districts would be slated for the November
20,2001, Planning Commission Study Session Meeting Agenda.
6. REPORTS
Commissioner Woodruff stated she would be the Planning Commission Liaison to the City Council for
the second meetings in November, 2001, and January, 2002. Commissioner Borkon stated she would be
the Planning Commission Liaison to the City Council for the first meetings in November, 2001, and
January, 2002.
Chair Bailey reported on matters considered and actions taken at the October 22, 2001, Regular City
Council Meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
Council Liaison Lizee commented she would ask the Commission to consider adding the identification
and eradication, where possible, of buckthorn as part of the landscaping requirements considered in Item
1 of this evening's Agenda.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 30t 2001
Page 8 of8
7. ADJOURNMENT
Pisula moved, Gagne seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of October 30, 2001,
at 10:18 P.M. Motion passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
.
'.'
,..
.
.
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhail@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
23 October 2001
RE:
Tritch Estates - Preliminary Plat
FILE NO.:
405(00.35)
.
In December of last year, Mr. Tom Tritch submitted an application for a preliminary plat
of approximately 2.9 acres of land located at 6060 Strawberry Lane. The Planning
Commission tabled the request pending resolution of a number of items raised inthe 28
December 2000 staff report (see Attachment I - copied in yellow). The owners of the
property have now agreed to sell the property to Dave Alan, Inc., subject to the buyer
receiving approval of the subdivision of the property. The buyer has now submitted a
revised preliminary plat for the property (see Exhibit A, attached). Background
information for this request is contained in the earlier staff report. It will be used as the
basis for this review.
1. , Street R.O.W. The revised plat has been modified reflecting the
recommendations made by staff.
2. Lot Area. All lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements for the R-ID
zoning district.
3. Lot Width. All lots have been adjusted to comply with minimum width
requirements as recommended in the earlier report.
4. Drainage and Utility Easements. Easements have been increased to comply with
Snorewood's Subdivision Code.
n
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
7.,4.
Memorandum
Re: Tritch Estates - Preliminary Plat
23 October 2001
5.
6.
.
.
Plat Name. The plat name has been changed from "XXX" to "Tritch Estates" (a
big improvement!).
Grading. Drainage and Utilities. To date staff has not received plans showing a
detention pond or proposed site grading. Nor has soils information been
submitted. As previously stated, there appears to more than adequate room for a
pond at the rear of the lots. Soils information and a grading plan are still
considered critical to approval of the plat.
City sewer and water are available for this plat. Final plans for the project must
include plans for these utilities. Since the installation of a water main will require
trenching along Strawberry Lane, serious consideration should be given to
burying existing overhead utility lines at the same time city utilities are
constructed.
If the City Engineer is comfortable enough with the revised plat, these items can
be addressed as part of the final plat.
7.
Tree Preservation and Reforestation. To the extent that utility or pond
construction necessitate tree removal, final plans for the project must include a
tI:ee preservation and reforestation plan.
8.
Lot Numbering:. Lot and block numbers are consistent with the Subdivision
Code;
9.
Existing House. In adjusting the lot line in the plat, the existing house ends up
straddling a lot line. Presumably it will be demolished. If this does not occur
before the final plat is submitted, the applicant must submit a bid for the
demolition, upon which a letter of credit will be required to guarantee the
demolition within 60 days of final plat approval. The L.O.C. must be for one an
one half times the amount of the demolition bid.
10. City Property. Prior to release of the final plat for the property, the applicant must
pay for the City property that is included in the plat. The past understanding was
that the price of the land would be equivalent to two of the assessments paid by
residents along Church Road.
Subject to the City Engineer's recommendation, it is recommended that the preliminary
plat be approved contingent upon the above items being addressed in the final plat. A
final plat must be submitted within six months of Council approval of the preliminary
plat.
Cc:
Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Dave Alan
Barbara Toothman
-2-
.
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
TRITCH ESTATES
I /
v/
PROPOSED DR...IN...GE "'ND UTILITY E"'SEMENTS "'RE SHOWN THUS:
1
I. ~-IO
- - - -.r ~.:.:: .~ - -;> - - --
-f -.
SITE DATA
LOT 1 . 17.279 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3967 "'CRES
LOT 2 . 14.567 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3349 ACRES
LOT 3 - 19.628 SQUARE FEET OR 0.4506 ACRES
LOT 4 . 17,734 SQU...RE FEET OR 0.4071 "'CRES
LOT 5 - 16,598 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3610 "'CRES
LOT 6 . 18,185 SQU...RE FEET OR 0.4175 ACRES
MAPlE AVE. - 11,126 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2554 ACRES
STRAWBERRY LN. . 12,109 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2780 ACRES
TOTAL SITE . 127,246 SQUARE FEET OR 2.9212 ACRES
/
/
/
/ tr~
/
/ rr~
( ~,
BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES,
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICA1ED, AND BEING 12 FEET IN
WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN
ON THE PLAT.
I
G ~.
~
c
v
...
..~
C~
'... C~
C.r) ...
'.... ~~
,
-'"
.......
C~
(Q
~::>
C.r)
('
J
'.
.1
C ~ ~ I
q V
Il' V
~ II
-< ~ ('
,. I
:i
"".
"".
\
~
...
~C
C~
C~
C::>
C~
,
"..
'..
l..J
Q;:
...
~ C~
l'J ~
ll:i C.r)
....
-.
"'C
4:::
1<
C.r)
. "
.
/ .
/1f 1 "''F---=-=-
/ Cj." I ~JI
/ /t 1<)
/ C\\ t...JI:;~1 " M
,\\1 1 "'J
,~... .....; ;:"'1
,.....' c), .. C
,..},\ I ~I ,
2545-57
679
I
I
AI
IV
AI
IV
c-
L-
1#
"
LEGEND: TREE LEGEND:
0 MANHOLE (3 DENOTES 6" ASH
& . GATE VALVE 8. DENOTES 8" BOX ELDER
+ SIGN .,0 DENOTES 10" CEDAR
II POWER POLE e. DENOTES 12" BASSWOOD
0 40 80 120 8-
~..~ I ,..1 MANHOLE NOT FIELD LOCATED DENOTES 14" ElM
SCALE IN FEET MAIL BOX ~I' DENOTES 16" SPRUCE
./). HYDRANT 8. DENOTES 18" MAPLE
. ELECTRIC METER 80 DENOTES 20" OAK
. TELEPHONE BOX ... DENOTES 22" PINE
POST Gn- DENOTES 24" POPLAR
--- OVERHEAD WIRE 8" DENOTES 26" CATALPA
- - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINES & DENOTES 28" WILLOW
o...A.A.A.A.AJ DENOTES TREE LINE
SURVEY FOR: TOM TRITCH
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6060 Strawberry Lane, Shorewood, MInnesota
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lota 38. 39 and 40. MINNEWASHT.... according to the recorded plat thereof and situate In
Hennepin County. Minnesota.
I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries
af the land abaw descrlbed ard of the location of all buRdlngs. If any. thereon, and all
vlslble encroachments, If any, 1rom or on said land.
Dated this 5th day of December, 2000
Revlsed this 10th day of JanuClry, 2001.
Revlsed this 9th day of February, 2001.
ReYlsed this 2nd day of Octobt..... 2001.
by.
EGAN, FIELD at NOWAK, INC.
,'tt!Surveyors
Jac B ke, Minnesota Wcense No. 20281
741 Wayzata Boulevard, Minneapolis, Mn.
Telephone: (952) 546-6837
NOTES:
,. The orientation af thlJ bearing system Is based on the east line of Lat 40,
MINNEWASHTA which Is assumed to haw a bearing of South 00 degrees 16 minutes
57 seconds East.
2. According to the City of Shorewood the property Is zoned R-1D (single fomlly
residential) lies within Flood Zone C (minimal hazard) per Federal Insurance Rate Map
Community Panel No. 270185 0010 C, dated .Ally 2. 1982 and has the following
bundlng setback requirements:
Front - 3D.00 feet
Side - 10.00 feet
Rear' - 35.00 feet
Side abutting public ROW-3D.OO feet
3. The area af the property described hereon Is 127,246 square feet or 2.9212 acres.
4. Exlst.lng utilities, services and under\ll"ound structures shown hereon, were located either
phYllfCOlly, from existing records made a\lOlIable to us or by resident testimony. Other
utnltles and services may be present. Verification and location of all utnltles and
servlces should be ob~alned from the owners of the respective utnltles prior to any
design, planning or excavation.
5. No tltll work was fun,lehed for the preparation of this lII""'y to wrify the legal
description or the existence of any easements or encumbrances.
6. BENCHMARK: Top nllt of hydrant located on the north side of Mople Street 320 feet
west of Strawberry Lanl - Elevation 978.60 feet.
OwNER AND DEYELOPER:
THOMAS N. TRITCH
4669 P"'RK ARCADIA DR.
SAN. JOSE, CAUFORNlA 95136-2505
TEt.S>HONE (408) 972-7178
SURVEYOR:
EGAN, FIELD at NOWAK, INC.
SUITE 200
7415 WAYlAtA BOULEVARD
MINNEAPOlIS. MINNESOTA 55426
TELEPHONE (952) 546-6837
ENGINEER:
ROGER A. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
13400 15TH AVE. NO.
SUlTEB
PlYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
(763)383-1084
(763)383-1089 FAX
EGAN FIELD & NOWAK IN~
SURVEYORS
Exhibit A
,
,,'!II
. CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhalf@cl.shorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
.
DATE:
28 December 2000
RE:
xxx - Preliminary Plat (Tom Tritch)
FILE NO.
405(00.35)
BACKGROUND
Mr. Tom Tritch requests approval of a preliminary plat for his property located at 6060
Strawberry Lane (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). As shown on Exhibit B,
he proposes to divide the property into six single-family residential lots.
.
The property in question consists of three existing parcels that total 127,245 square feet in
area (2.9 acres). The land'is located in the R-ID, Single-Family Residential zoning
district. The northerly parcel contains a home and two outbuildings. The westernmost
parcel is owned by the City of Shorewood and is occupied by the cul-de-sac for Church
Road. The remaining parcel is currently vacant. The City Council agreed earlier this
year to allow the applicant to include the City's property in his plat. It has been the
City's intent since the purchase of the land for the cul-de-sac improvement to.seIl it to the
adjoining landowner for the equivalent of two assessments.
The property is bounded on its northwest border by the Hennepin County Regional
Railroad Authority (H.C.R.R.A),right-of-way. Strawberry Lane forms the eastern border
of the site, and Maple Avenue lies to the south. It should be noted that Maple Avenue is
a substandard street right-of-way that presently has one residential driveway on it.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Although it is reasonable to anticipate that the property will easily yield six lots, the plat
as presented has too many unresolved issues for staff to recommend approval at this time.
n
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ATTACHMENT I
Memorandum
XXX Preliminary Plat (Tritch)
28 December 2000
Consequently, this report will serve as a "sketch plan" review. The following
recommendations should be incorporated into a complete preliminary plat for review at
the February Planning Commission meeting.
1. Street R.O.W. The plat takes advantage of existing streets (Church Road and
Strawberry Lane) for access to the new lots. Although Maple A venue will not
serve this plat, the location of existing sewer and water utilities and the existing
private driveway suggest that it should not be vacated.
Strawberry Lane is substandard in terms ofr.o.w. width. In order to bring it up to
the 50-foot minimum width requirement, additional r.o.w., as shown on Exhibit
C, should be required for plat approval.
2.
Lot Area. The R-ID district requires lots to be at least 10,000 square feet in area.
As shown on Exhibit B, the smallest lots in the plat are approximately 15,120
square feet. Although the lot area tabulations will change somewhat based on the
recommendations contained herein, the new lots will still exceed minimum area
requirements.
.
3. Lot Width. Four of the lots do not meet the minimum width requirement of 75
feet. This is easily resolved by adjusting the lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 as shown
on Exhibit C. The widths of Lots 5 and 6 can be increased by simply enlarging
the right-of-way for the Church Road cul-de-sac. This is also illustrated on
Exhibit C. It is recommended that the preliminary plat be revised, moving the
line that forms the rear lot line of all of the lots approximately 10 feet to the east.
This will increase the buildable area of Lots 5 and 6, without adversely affecting
Lots 1-4.
4.
Drainage and Utility Easements. The plat shows six-foot easements along side lot
lines. Shorewood's Subdivision Code requires these to be 10 feet.
.
5. Plat Name. XXX has an undesirable connotation. The applicant has indicated
that the plat will be renamed.
6. Grading. drainage and utilities. Shorewood's development regulations require
that a detention pond be built so that the rate of runoff after development will not
exceed the rate prior to development. While there appears to be adequate room
for such a pond (most likely where the rear of Lots 1, 2 and 6 come together), the
pond should be shown on the plat. A drainage easement should also be included
for the pond. Even though no additional grading is necessary for the plat itself,
the preliminary plat should include a grading plan, showing proposed drainage
and floor elevations. This will be used in evaluating future building permits for
the lots. Also, given the relatively high water table in the area of this property, it
is recommended that the applicant's surveyors provide information relative to
soils and depth of water table.
-2-
..
Memorandum
XXX Preliminary Plat (Tritch)
28 December 2000
An engineering staff repOlt will be prepared upon receipt of a complete
preliminary plat.
7. Tree Preservation and Reforestation. It may be possible to construct the pond
referenced in 6. above without removing existing trees. If so, tree preservation
and replacement can be addressed with individual building permits.
8. Lot Numbering. The proposed lots and "Block 1" must be numbered on the
preliminary plat.
It is recommended that the hearing be continued to 6 February 2001. The changes
recommended herein should be made and revised plans should be submitted no later than
8 January 2001.
.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Tom Tritch
Barbara Toothman
.
-3-
,\0
~<!; fir \ ljEm
,\0
,\0
,\0
o~r
~- Ll I
~ ~ ~Mr~N RD
,\.
,\0
~
~,
,\0
-
, ~ r-L-- ~~r- 1/
~ v /' /If
~. ~[{ f/t
~ y ~~s~
,M~M W WAl
'"",, V
POINTE COURT
POINTE CIRCut
,\0
2
m
~
r; RD
A-
I
-f~RfC ~
t:T~- ~
~
,\0 o~~ "Y \
s;:
Subject EM ~ \ ~n6
. I Prope .. 1~ CI
STRA' VBE RRY ---,
~ I IR ~ J
~ / =J veJ ~R "/I 0 P 0 -::::
~vZJ47'1 ~l~;;R: I =t~
I(,\. *
I~,\o
'-
II DR
i~DREW/OQD
~
t\NHASSEN
62ND ST W
00
i
o
800 Feet
I
~
N
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
XXX - Preliminary Plat (Tritch)
"..
NORTH
tJ6+ to ~41.L
SITE AREA TABULAllONS
TOTAL SITE =127,245 SQUARE FEET
PROPOSED R\W -8733 SQUARE FEET
LOT 1 == 31.296 SQUARE FEET
LOT 2 - 15.119 SQUARE FEET
LOT 3 = 15.119 SQUARE FEET
LOT 4 = 19.513 SQUARE FEET
LOT 5 - 15;574 SQUARE. FEET
eOT 6 = 21.888 SQUARE FEET
v
.
.. '
/'
. '
~ '"
/
/'
"/
/'
/
/
/
/'
/'
/'
/
/'
/
/
/
. ///
/
/'
/
/
",
.m.o
.A '\ . tn.,
/'. '.
/ 1 ~"pw---
,,/ 'I z 1 .
1 f;;4 1
1 f< 1
1 1
I' 1
-I -Sl
1 ~I
1 1
,
Exhibit B
PRELIMINARY PLAT
XXX - Preliminary Plat (Tritch)
~.
'NORTH
I /.
I /
v/
tJtrl to ~t~
..
~ '\ .I'F.L'
, '.
f ~'pw---
f ::;) /
/ fJ /
/ i( f
f /
I t:l;J I
, ~I
f
..
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
. Craig Dawson, City Administrator 'fv
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~ /
October 30, 2001
TO:
FROM:
RE: Preliminary Plat Review, Tritch Estates
Planset dated Revised October 2,2001
Background:
This 2.9 acres site is located at 6060 Strawberry Lane (refer to Attachment 1). Mr. Tom Tritch has
submitted a preliminary plat to subdivide the parcel into 6 single-family lots (refer to Attachment 2).
.
The property currently exists as three lots with one single-family dwelling and two accessory
structures near. the northeast comer of the site. Topography is very flat with 1 foot of relief across
the site. Vegetation is mature and is scattered throughout the parcels.
Right of Ways and Easements
The easterly four lots abut, and will directly access Strawberry Lane. Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 will
have public access via the Church Road cul-de-sac. It should be noted that the plat drawing has
denoted the cul-de-sac incorrectly as Maple A venue, versus Church Road.
The City's subdivision standards require that residential streets are to have a minimum right of way
width of 50.0 feet. Typically a 25.0-foot width is obtained from both sides of the right of way
centerline. This plat is in conformance with this requirement, with the exception of Lot 3 Block 1.
The plat proposes a width of 16.5 feet along the easterly property boundary of Lot 3. This width
was proposed to compliment the existing 33.5-foot width on the east side of the right of way
centerline. While the combination of the 33.5 feet and 16.5 feet totals 50.0 feet. it does not lend
itself to a straight roadway alignment. Therefore a 25.0-foot minimum right of way width is
recommended along Strawberry Lane.
#.
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.'
Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
Preliminary Plat Tritch Estates
October 30,2001
Page 2 of 3
Municipal Water and Sanitary Sewer Service
Municipal water service is available to the site within the Maple Avenue right of way. This
, watermain is an 8-inch diameter main.
.
In accordance with the City's Water Implementation Plan, a 12-inch diameter watermain is to be
extended along Strawberry Lane, as development permits. It is recommended that this pipe be
placed immediately outside of the bituminous pavement along the entire length of the easterly plat
boundary. It is suggested that this construction take place outside of the roadway surface as
Strawberry Lane was recently reconstructed. The 25.0-foot minimum right of way, combined with
the standard lO.O-foot drainage and utility easement will be adequate for the installation and
maintenance of this utility.
Overall sanitary sewer is available to Lots 3-6, Block 1 via the Metropolitan Council sewer main
located on the centerline of Strawberry Lane. Currently, there is only one single service line that has
been extended from the main to the right of way line. This is complicated by the fact that the
sanitary sewer main in the street is approximately 20 feet deep.
.
If sanitary sewer service is to be obtained for Lots 1-4 from the Metropolitan Council's utility, the
applicant's Engineer will be required to petition the City of Shorewood to make application for
installation of the additional services from this utility. In turn, the City forward the petition to the
Metropolitan Council for their review and approval, for the applicant to install additional services to
service the remaining lots. It is also to be noted that due to the excessive depth of this utility, the
applicant's Engineer may consider the construction of a lateral main to service these lots.
It appears that Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 will need to obtain sanitary sewer service by an extension of
the sanitary sewer along Maple Avenue. It is recommended that the sanitary sewer within Maple
Avenue be extended to the boulevard area of the Church Road cul-de-sac.
Grading and Drainage
This'site is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District boundaries, and the City of
Shorewood's sub-watershed number WC 5 (refer to Attachment 3).
, Drainage for this site occurs by a combination of site infiltration and runoff through a 12-inch
diameter culvert that flows under Strawberry Lane and to the east. As mentioned earlier in this
report, the site is very flat. While this may minimize the site alteration necessary, it makes for
significant drainage issues for the entire site.
Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
Preliminary Plat Tritch Estates
October 30,2001
Page 3 of3
While the MCWD requirements do not mandate a detention basin, the City of Shorewood's Storm
water Management plan does require rate retention. Therefore, the applicant's engineer will be
required to provide the City with grading and hydraulic calculations that maintain the predeveloped
runoff rate, and meet storage requirements for the laO-year frequency event.
.
In addition, the applicant will be required to provide adequate soil borings that clearly documents
current groundwater levels, or indications of past dynamic groundwater levels for the site. In
accordance with the City's stormwater management plan, the lowest floor elevation is to remain a
minimum of 4.0 feet above currently observed groundwater levels, 2.0 feet above the elevation of
any known historic groundwater elevations, and 1.0 foot above the 100 year high water elevation
Recommendations
Staff recommends that the preliminary plat for Tritch Estates be approved contingent upon the
following conditions:
1. The plat boundary shall be revised to include a 25.0-foot minimum right of way width west of
the Strawberry Lane centerline.
2. As part of the Plans and Specifications review for this plat, the applicant's Engineer shall
provide plans and specifications for the installation of a 12-inch diameter watermain along the
easterly plat boundary and Strawberry Lane.
.
3. As part of the Plans and Specifications review for this plat, the applicant's Engineer shall
provide plans and specifications for the extension of sanitary sewer service from Maple Lane to
the Church Road cul-de-sac.
4. As part of the final plat review, the applicant shall provide hydraulic calculations that
demonstrate adequate rate control for the lOa-year frequency event.
5. As part of the Plans and Ifications review for this plat the applicant's Engineer shall provide
plans and specific . s for the installation of a 12-inch diameter watermain along the easterly
plat boundar nd Strawberry Lane.
4. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with soil boring information which demonstrates
the current groundwater elevations for the area, and indications of mottling or other data which
indicates the historic groundwater elevations for the plat. Once elevations of groundwater are
documented, the lowest floor elevations shall be coordinated and shown of the final grading
plans for the subject site.
~~ ttr \llEEH
.l.
'" .l.
.l.
'" ~ <<f
:r
~
o I -
~ RD
-
----., I
I I ~~
I I I -1 ~~~~:ct ~ ~"~m
"=' STR!',\\fB~ RRY n c: -J /
,! mR I J ~\=J~p IDLJ =: .
~ ,/ r-- ~.VE ,-m- \ Ie -','1 . L\~'l. L
I~ ~. ./ ~'~ tE ~~5-HA tt R I ITIL- . '--
I 0 1 ~ 1-11
pR E~~O(~C ",Y
,\.
'"
IINTE COURT .
'"
'INTE CIRCLE
,\.
'"
,
2
m
-
~"
~RI
.
I
I
-
~NHASSEN
00
I
1.
1!;J)::
~-0\--
--I~I ~m
~ ~ ~Mr~~JN RD
.---
I~ -L ~4/
I~!I:.. . /- I ._
l' )~v~ I ~ /t
j.~~
L----' ~ J~ 7 / WAl
J ~~ ~~ -
1
'"
-
I.. I
I
I
, I
-
~
<(~ . - ~
6<:<:- P'
-,
If '" .I. ~
I~",
i'--.
62ND ST W
o
~
N
Attachment 1
800 Feet
I
, .
1.
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
TRITCH ESTATES
I /
v/
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UllUTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOYtW THUS:
I I
1- ~-la
10-, -I
- - - -~r - -.J
SITE DATA
LOT 1 .. 17,279 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3967 ACRES
LOT 2 .. 14.587 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3349 ACRES
LOT 3 .. 19,628 SQUARE FEET OR 0.4506 ACRES
LOT 4 .. 17,734 SQUARE FEET OR 0.4071 ACRES
LOT 5 .. 16,598 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3810 ACRES
LOT 6 .. 18,185 SQUARE FEET OR 0.4175 ACRES
MAPLE AVE. .. 11,128 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2554 ACRES
S'lRAWBERRY LN. - 12,109 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2780 ACRES
TOTAL SITE .. 127,246 SQUARE FEET OR 2.9212 ACRES
/
/
/
/
/
/
L_"?"__
t,.~
t~
BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SlOE LOT UNES,
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND BEING 12 FEET IN
WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNES AS SHOWN
ON THE PLAT..
"..
.
..
....
..
c~
...... c~
CJ') ..
...... "'~
,
.",
.....
c~
CQ
:::1
-----
I
C ~.
~
c
""
f'
J
-<
C I
J
~
~ ('
,I
C ~ ~ I
f::l ....
\1' V
"
.
"'~
c~
"'.
"'.
"
~,
",
/
/ ~'j
/ (,#'
/ ,)
\"~
"...'
l' ,
~ 'It'
2545-57
6711
~
E
AI
, y
CJ')
" , I
'I"
,
,
~,
I Y
LEGEND:
TREE LEGEND:
e DEN01ES 6" ASH
@a DENOTES 8" BOX ELDER
iI,. DENOTES 10" CEDAR
@.z DENOTES 12" BASSWOOD
8- DENOTES 14" Eu.l
.a DENOTES 16" SPRUCE
8a DENOTES 18" MAPLE
e. DENOTES 20" OAK
"22 DENOTES 22" PINE
&, DENOTES 24" POPLAR
8.a DENOTES 26" CATALPA
e. DENOTES 28" WILLOW
~ DENOTES 'lREE UNE
0 40 , 80 120
~_..l 1 I l
--
SCALE IN FEET
0 MANHOLE
II GATE VALVE
SIGN
1:\ POWIER POLE:
,~) MANHOLE NOT FlElD LOCATED
MAIL BOX
.0- H'1'ORANT
II ElECTRIC METER
.. TElEPHONE BOX
POST
--- OVERHEAD WIRE
- - - - BUILDING SETBACK UNES
SURVEY FOR: TOM TRITCH
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6080 Strawberry Lene, $horewood. Minnesota
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 3B, 39 and 40. MINNEWASHT A. accordIng to the recorded plot thereof and sltuote In
Hennepin County. Minnesota.
I hereby cnlfy that thle Is a true and correct representation of a eurvey of the boundaries
of the lond aba.... described and of the locatron of all buDdln9s, If any, thereon, and 011
\/Ielble encroachments, If any, fram or on said land.
Dated this 5th day of Oecember, 2000
Revised thIs 10th day of Jonuory, 2001.
Revised thl.. 9th day of February. 2001.
Re\llsed this 2nd day of Octab~, 2001.
by:
EGAN, FlELD oS: NOWAK, INC.
'(J!~yors
Jac B ke, Minnesota Ucense No. 20261
741 WaYZClta Boulewrd. Mlnneapalls. Mn.
Telephone: (952) 546-6837
NOTES:
1. Tho orlentatlCln of thl. bearln9 system Is based an the east line af Lot 40,
MINNEWASHTA which Is assumed ta have a bearing af South 00 degrees 16 minutes
57 Ileconds East.
2. AccordlnQ to the CIty of Sharewood the property Is zoned R-l0' (sln!!le famUy
resIdential) lies within Flood Zone C (minimal hazord) per Federal Insurance Rate Map
Community Panel No. 270165 0010 C, dated .kJly 2, 1962 and has the followIng
buDdIng eetback requlremente:
Franl - 30.00 feet
SIde - 10.00 feet
Rear - 35.00 feat
Side abuttIng public ROWK30.00 feet
3. The area of the property described hereon Ie 127.246 equars feet or 2.9212 OcreL
4. ExlstlnQ utftltrell, eftce, and underground structures shown hereon, were located eIther
physically. fram sXlstlng recards mQd, awDobls ta UI or by resident testimony. other
utDltles and services mal' be prllSent. Verlflcatlon and locatIon of all utllltlee and
Incelshould. b, obtained from ,the owners of the respectl.... utilities prior to any
design, plannlnQ or excowtlon.
5. No title worit was fun,l,li,d for the preparatIon of thIs Ml~y ta ....rlfy the leQoI
description ar the exl8tence of any easemente or encumbrances.
6. BENCHMARK: Top nut of h)'drant located on the north sIde of Mopls Street 320 fset
wllllt of Strawba"y Lans - Eleygtlon 978.60 feat.
OWNER ANO DtVELOPER:
THOMAS N. TRITCH
4669 PARK ARCADIA Olt
SAN JOSE, CAUFOR~A 95138-2505
TELEPHONE (4Ol!) 972-7176
SURVEYOR:
EGAN, FIELD /Ie "'OWAIC, INC.
SUI'IE 200
7415 WAYlATA BOULEVARD
UINtolEAPOUS, MINNESOTA 55426
'lELEPHONE (952) 546-6837
ENGINEER:
ROGER A. ANDERSON /lc ASSOCIATES. INC.
13400 15TH AVE. NO.
SlJITE B
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5~1
(763)383-1084
(763)363-1089 FAX
EGAN FIELD & NC
SURVEYOR:
ATTACHMENT 2
..i'
f
'..
/
!Me
Mln~
Attachment 3
n. ,
-D-R-A-F-T-
Reeulation of 24-Hour Uses
Section 1201.02 Subd. 20. (Definitions)
TWENTY FOUR-HOUR USES: Any commercial use that is regularly open
for business or involves other significant, outdoor activity during any hour between
ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M.
Zoning Code Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.
. "t. Business Hours: Twenty four-hour uses as defined in Section 1202.02 Subd.
20. of this Code may be allowed by conditional use permit, as regulated by Section
. 1201.04 of this Code, provided that:
(1) No off-street loading shall occur within two hundred feet (200') of a
residential district boundary during the hours between ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and
seven 0' clock (7:00) A.M.
(2) Movement of sweeping vehicles, garbage trucks, maintenance trucks,
shopping carts, and other service vehicles and equipment is prohibited within two
hundred feet (200') of a residential district boundary.
.
(3) Outdoor speaker systems or other public address systems which can be
heard outside are not allowed to be used between the hours of ten 0' clock (10: 00)
P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M.
(4) All lighting not reasonably required for security or for business
operations (within 100 feet of the main entrance to the building) must.be turned off
between the hours of ten 0' clock (10:00) P.M. and sunrise.
1 % 1
7-D.
.
.
OCT 09 2001 12:52 FR L.S.& D
6512227644 TO 99524740128
P.04/14
. .
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION No._
Resolution Accepting Donation of Conservation
Easement from Dean and Barbara Riesen
WHEREAS. the City of Shorewood has adopted a policy to solicit and accept donations
of certain conservation easements upon undeveloped lands which form a part of large
homesteads or estates in order to protect natural, scenic, open or wooded areas within the City;
and
WHEREAS, Dean and Barbara Riesen. 20080 Excelsior Boulevard, Shorewood, have
offered to donate a conservation easement and restriction covering a significant portion of their
homestead property, which easement covers land in a natural and scenic condition;
WHEREAS, the conservation easementcoV'ers land which otherwise would have been
subdivided off of the Riesens' homestead parcel into two shoreline lots for further development;
WHEREAS, the City Attorney and City Staff have reviewed and approved the form of
the proposed Conservation Easement and Restrictions Agreement, a copy of which is attached;
WHEREAS, the Conservation Easement and Restrictions Agreement appears to comply
with Minn. Stat. ~~ 84C.Ol-.OS and 84.64, and IRe ~ 170(h); and
WHEREAS, the only condition of the offer is that the City would relinquish the easement
and restrictions if the donation was detennined not to qualify for a deduction under m.e * 170(h)
and regulations thereunder.
NOW THEREFORE~ the Shorewood City Council hereby adopts the following findings
and Resolutions:
FINDINGS
1. Dean and Barbara Riesen are the owners of a large homestead parcel which would
be burdened by the attached. conserva.tion ea.sement and restrictions;
2. The land covered by the conservation easement and restriction: . (a) may~ under
current City regulations, be subdivided into multiple riparian lots and (b) are among those the
City considers most subject to intensive development and subdivision pressure;
3. The land covered by the easement contains certain unique features including
portions of Foot Lake, shore lands of that lake, aquatic habitat, mature trees, and sensitive
vegetation and open spaces;
201821%vl
4
:#8A
OCT 09 2001 12:52 FR L.S.& D
6512227644 TO 99524740128
P.05/14
4. There is intense development pressure in the area surrounding the easement area
and further development would degrade the natural and scenic character of~ and habitat in, the
easement area; .
S. The donation offered by the Riesens is for conservation purposes and is perpetual;
6. The donation offered by the Riesens is consistent with state policies regarding
preservation of open spaoes;
7. . The donation will create a significant public benefit and the City wishes to accept
the donation on the terms expressed in the attached Conservation Easement and Restrictions
Agreement; and
8. The donation and the proposed Conservation Easement and Restriction
Agreement is consistent with Minnesota conservation statutes and policies, and with the City's
recently-adopted consCIVation easement policy.
RESOLpTION
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City accepts the don.ation of the
conservation easement and restriction offered by the Riesens upon the terms and conditions of
the Conservation Basement and Restrictions Agreement attached hereto, subject to the condition
regarding deductibility under IRe ~ 170(h).
.
ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council this
day of November, 2001.
THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
By Its Mayor
.
201&212vl
2
5
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND
RESTRICTION
This donation of a CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RESTRICTION is made this
day of Noyember December, 2001 by DEAN A. RIESEN and BARBARA H. RIESEN,
husband and wife (the "Owners") to the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, a municipal corporation
under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes ~~ 84.C.Ol-.05 authorize the donation by private citizens
of non-possessory, conservation easements, to protect natural, scenic and open space values, and
the authorized donees include any governmental. body empowered to hold an interest in real
property under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes ~ 84.64 authorize the donation by private citizens of
similar negative easements, called conservation restrictions, to retain the natural, scenic, and
open or wooded condition of land, and the authorized donees include, any home rule charter or
statutory city; and
WHEREAS, the City is a: (i) governmental body empowered to own interest in real
estate and (ii) statutory city under Minnesota Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City has concluded, and its comprehensive plan acknowledges, that
there is a need for conservation easements and restrictions to protect and preserve some of the
natural, scenic, open andlor wooded parcels remaining within its City limits, because: (1) the
City is in the path of intensive suburban development; and (2) the relatively small lot size
requirements in the City encourage the subdivision of tracts of land now held in estates or large
homesteads, or in natural, scenic and open or wooded condition; and
.
WHEREAS, the City has recently adopted a policy under which it will solicit and accept
the donation of conservation easements and restrictions covering natural, scenic, and open or
wooded spaces which are part of large homesteads or estates, and which are threatened by
intensive development andlor subdivision pressure; and
WHEREAS, the Owners own a large homestead parcel iri the City of Shorewood legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Owner Tract"), and wish to donate to the City a
Conservation Easement and Restriction (CE&R) over part of said tract, consistent with the
above-named State and City policies and procedures, and consistent with the rules and
regulations under United States Internal Revenue Code (IRC) ~ 170 (h); and
WHEREAS, the donated CE&R cover and encumber lands which otherwise would have
been subdivided and sold off as two (2) lakeshore lots; and
2016875v4
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the donation of the CE&R and has concluded that it
produces a significant public benefit because of the: (i) intensity of land development pressures
in the vicinity of the Easement Area; (ii) the lake, shoreland, habitat, treed and open space
characteristics of the subject property;~ (iii) the consistency of the CE&R with state and local
conservation policies; (iv) the likelihood that further development of the Easement Area would
contribute to degradation of the natural and scenic character of, and habitat in, the Easement
Area; and (v) the perpetual nature of the CE&R.
NOW THEREFORE, For good and valuable consideration, the Owners, pursuant to the
aforementioned Minnesota Statutes, hereby donate, grant, bargain, transfer and convey to the
City of Shorewood, its permitted successors and assigns, the conservation easements and
restrictions (the "CE&R") that are more fully described herein, subject to the terms and
conditions herein. The CE&R burden, and run over, on and across, the tracts of land lying and
being in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota, described and depicted in Exhibit B
attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Easement Areas"), which Easement Areas are a palt
of the Owner Tract.
TO HA VB AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and
appurtenances thereunto, forever. And the Owners, for themselves and their successors and
assigns, covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Owners are well seized in fee
simple of the Easement Areas and that they have good right to donate and impose the CE&R,
and that the Easement Areas are free from all encumbrances except the lien of real estate taxes
and installments of special assessments payable therewith which are not yet due.
.
1. Effective Date. The donation contained in this instrument shall not be complete
unless and until accepted by a resolution of the City. The Owners and the City both intend that
the full value of this CE&R qualify for deduction as a "qualified conservation contribution"
under IRC ~ 170(h) and the rules and regulations thereunder.
2. Scope of Easement. The purpose of this CE&R is to assure that the Easement
Areas shall at all times predominately: (i) remain in their natural and scenic condition; (ii)
remain open or wooded space, and not be developed; and (iii) provide or protect natural and .
aquatic habitat for fish, wildlife and plants. In furtherance of this objective, and to define the
scope of the easement and restriction, the Owners, for themselves and their heirs, personal
representatives and assigns, do hereby covenant and agree with the City that:
A.
No buildings, permanent structures, signs, billboards or other advertising
of any kind, shall hereafter be erected or placed on or above any part of
the Easement Areas without the prior approval of the City; and no
structure within the Easement Areas, even if approved by the City, shall
ever be used for residential or commercial purposes.
B.
No healthy mature trees shall be removed from the Easement Areas
without the prior approval of the City; provided, however, that Owners
reserve the right to remove damaged, diseased or infected trees, fallen
leaves, and noxious trees (including specifically buckthorn) and weeds,
2016875v4
2
and to plant, maintain and or landscape the Easement Areas in a manner
not inconsistent with the conservation purposes of this CE&R.
C. No soil or other substance or material shall be dumped or placed as
landfill on the Easement Areas.
D. No trash, waste or unsightly or offensive materials shall be dumped or
placed on the Easement Areas.
E. No surface mining of any kind shall be permitted, and no loam, peat,
gravel, soil, rock or other material substance shall be excavated, dredged
or removed from the Easement Areas.
F.
No activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation,
erosion control, or soil conservation, nor other acts or uses detrimental to
the Easement Areas as a shoreland and a natural and scenic open or
wooded space, shall be conducted or permitted to be conducted within the
. Easement Areas.
.
G. This donation is made exclusively for conservation purposes and the
Easement Areas shall be kept and maintained in a natural or scenic, open
or wooded condition, substantially reflecting natural conditions in the
Easement Areas, protecting natural habitat, and affording visual access
and scenic enjoyment to the general public.
.
3. Dri'lcway Reservation Reservations. The Owners reserve the right to cross the
Easement Area in a reasonable manner for access and egress purposes, on a driveway not
exceeding twenty-five (25) feet in width, to and from any home and related structures now or
hereafter located on the Owner Tract outside of the Easement Areas. This right applies to the
driveway currently in place on the Owner Tract and any replacement driveway, which
replacement driveway may be relocated within the Easement Area. This reserved rigfit is
nppurtenaat to, benefits and runs Moreover. inasmuch as the CE&R l!rant non-nossessorv ril!hts
in the Easement Areas. the Owners further reserve the ril!ht to construct. remove. renlace and
maintain nerimeter fencinl! around some or all of the boundaries of the Easement Areas. Finallv.
the restrictions in the CE&R rel!ardinl! structures and imorovements do not reauire the Owners to
remove or take anv remedial actions with resnect to the filled-in foundation currentlv located
within the Easement Areas. and the Owners reserve the ril!ht to use the filled-in foundation for
recreationalnurooses. All of these reserved ril!hts are annurtenant to. benefit and run with the
part of the Owner Tract not lying within the Easement Areas. .
4.
perpetual.
Term. The easements and restrictions donated and imposed in this CE&R are
5.
Miscellaneous Terms.
2016875v4
3
A. The Owners, for themselves and their successors-in-title, retain all rights
(but shall not be obligated) to enter upon, maintain, care for and landscape
the Easement Area consistent with the restrictions expressed above.
B. This CE&R is a nonpossessory non-Dossessorv easement and restriction
and shall not operate to, or be deemed to, grant to Shorewood any right to
enter upon, use or improve, or to permit the public any right to enter upon,
use or improve, any part of the Easement Areas as a park or recreational
area. Moreover, nothing in this instrument grants any member of the
public the right or privilege whatsoever to enter upon the Easement Areas
for any purpose (other than upon the invitation of the Owners).
6. Remedies. All the rights and remedies under Minnesota Statutes ~. 84.65 and
~ 84C.03 shall be available to the City to enforce this CE&R. Also, if there shall be a violation
or breach, or an attempt to violate or breach, any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this
CE&R, the City may prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person or entity
violating or breaching, or attempting to violate or breach, any such term, covenant or condition, .
either to prevent such violation or breach by injunction or to recover damages for such violation
or breach.
7. Limited Assignment. The City's interest as donee, and holder of the easement
and restriction rights, under this instmment may not be assigned or conveyed, except that
assignment is permitted if the following conditions are first met: (a) the City requires that the
assignee present a written acknowledgement that the conservation purposes the donation was
originally intended to advance will continue to be carried out by the assignee, and (b) the
assignee must be an organization qualifying, at the time of the assignment, as a qualified donee
under IRC ~ 170 (h)(3) and the rules and regulations thereunder (or successor code sections and
regulations). The Owners' right to sell, transfer or assign their interest in the Owner Tract shall
be unfettered, except that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall be subject to this CE&R.
8. Covenants Run With Land. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof shalllun
with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners of the Owner Parcel and the .
Easement Areas, and shall inure to the benefit of Shorewood, its permitted successors and
assigns.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Owners have caused these presents to be executed the day
and year first above written.
Dean A. Riesen
Barbara H. Riesen
2016875v4
4
.
.
STATEOFMlNNESOTA )
)ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPlN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
2001 by Dean A. Riesen and Barbara H. Riesen, husband and wife.
day of December,
Notary Public
This Instmment Drafted By:
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD (JMF)
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
380 St. Peter Street, Suite 500
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
20t6875v4
5
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF
OWNER TRACT
E. 35 rods of Lot 50, Aud, Sub. 141, and All that part of Lot 48, "Auditors Subdivision Number
One Hundred FOlty-one (141)" Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying NOlth of the Township
Road, EXCEPT that part thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of
said Lot 48, thence south along the West line of said Lot 48, a distance of 334.43 feet, to the
actual point of beginning of the land to be described; thence angle left 120 degrees 30 minutes, a
distance of 67.0 feet; thence angle right, 99 degrees, 03 minutes, a distance of 304.50 feet, more
or less to the Northerly right of way line of the Township Road; thence Southwesterly along the
Northerly right of way line of said Town Road, to the West line of said Lot 48; thence North
along the West line of said Lot 48, to the point of beginning.
ALSO EXCEPT That part of Lot 48, Auditor's Subdivision No. 141, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 48, thence
South, assumed bearing, along the west line of said Lot 48 a distance of 334.43 feet; thence
NOlth 59 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 67.00 feet to the point of beginning of
the land being described; thence South 21 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of
275.22 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of Excelsior Boulevard as now laid out and
traveled; thence easterly along said right-of-way line a distance of 69.89 feet along a curve, (not
tangential to last described course) concave southerly, having a radius of 469.50 feet, a central
angle of 8 degrees 31 minutes 46 seconds and a chord bearing of North 72 degl~ees 13 minutes 07
seconds East; thence North 76 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds East along said right-of-way line a
distance of 51.00 feet, thence North a distance of 222.91 feet to the point of intersection with a
line bearing East from the point of beginning; thence West a distance of 216.73 feet to the point
of beginning, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
.
.
Z0l6875v4
'"
.
.
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION
OF EASEMENT AREAS
2016875v4
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
Larry Brown
DATE:
21 November 2001
RE:
Request for No Parking Signs - Gideon Woods Townhome
Association
FILE NO.
Streets (Glen Road)
.
Residents of the Gideon Woods Townhome Association have requested that "No
Parking" signs be placed on the north side of Glen Road between their entrance road and
the County Road 19 public right-of-way (see Exhibit A). They initially inquired about
curbing in that location to prevent cars from pulling over and parking there. Their goal is
to dress up the corner near the pond.
Staff has reviewed the request and agree that it is a reasonable and economical solution to
the problem. No adjoining property owners would be adversely affected by the parking
restriction. The only issue would be the expense, which is estimated to be approximately
$100 for two signs and posts. It should be noted that the City has not charged for parking
signage in the past. Given recent budget constraints this is worthy of discussion.
Cc: Craig Dawson
Nancy Clegg
ft
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
8.B.
OCT 0 1 2001
September 27,2001
:i.. '~L :.::-::;;;t.::'~::':';~~:~ ;......,..'c "':':"'_
Mr. Brad Neilsen
Planning Director
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Dear Mr. Neilsen:
Pursuant to our meeting on September 20, I am writing to formalize our
understanding concerning the city's role in property improvement at Gideon
Woods townhomes.
.
Item 1: It is our understanding that the city will remove the dead trees and
hanging dead tree limbs from the trees on the city right of way on the north side
of Glen Road between the intersection of Glen Road and Highway 19. I would
like to request that we move forward with this before winter.
Item 2: We had discussed the is issue of loitering at the corner of County Road
19 and Glen Road. I would like to propose posting "No Parking" signs on the
north side of Glen Road between Highway 19 and the entrance to Gideon Woods
townhomes, to minimize the loitering and enhance the safety of children waiting
for school buses.
Item 3: The street light at the comer of Glen Road and Gideon Lane is not
working properly. I believe the light is a security light in that it should go on when
approached however it works in the opposite. If you approach it the light shuts
off. In addition, at this time the light needs to be replaced as it is burned out.
Beyond that the light in front of 5500 is also burned out and needs to be
replaced.
.
51p,c;rely, X 7 /
"~Iegg t;
Gideon Wood Townhome Association
5525 Gideon Lane
Shorewood, MN 55331
952-474-0059
\ .
-!4 J 1-1
/' tf ,?, ."
L. I;._~_
i' i~.:"~3/
./
c; ..'
.-y.. .. ". I.
c/o" "-.;:. .,":-..., ,', ," \
..
(,~ ;(~b~
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council ^ h....
Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator lJ.U.)
November 21,2001
Funding Allocation for New SLMPD Station
.
At its special meeting on November 19,2001, the Coordinating Committee of the South Lake
Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) unanimously recommended that a new police station be
funded on an ad valorem (or tax capacity) basis. Each city's allocation for the station would be based
on its percentage of the total tax capacity of the four member cities. The Coordinating Committee
believed that this basis was the most appropriate philosophical approach as the station would be a
multi-community facility. (A copy of the rationale andillustrative financial effects which were
provided to the Coordinating Committee is attached.)
On November 5, 2001, the Shorewood City Council adopted a resolution of commitment to a new
police station (Resolution No. 01-072). Related to funding, the resolution stated the joint powers
agreement would need to be amended such that:
During the Coordinating Committee's discussion of this matter, Mayor Love stressed the importance
~at all of the cities be vital participants in the community visioning process commissioned by
Shorewood and the downtown planning process for which Excelsior just received a grant from the
Metrop~litan Council. Excelsior Mayor Haugland stated her concurrence.
It is expected that the City Councils will take positions regarding the acceptability of ad valorem
obligations on the following schedule: Shorewood on November 26, Tonka Bay on November 27,
Excelsior on December 3, and Greenwood on December 4.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
A revision to Resolution No. 01-072 has been prepared for Council's consideration.
n
t.J PRINTEO ON RECYCLED PAPER
4/=-;]C-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A COMMITMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW POLICE STATION
FOR THE SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is a Member City of the South Lake Minnetonka Police
Department (SLMPD); and
WHEREAS, the members of the SLMPD Coordinating Committee have unanimously
declared that the current police facility at 810 Excelsior Boulevard, Excelsior, is inadequate, and
recommended that a new police station be constructed and attached to the Excelsior Fire District's
west fire station at 24140 Smithtown Road, Shorewood; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed information and analysis prepared by the .
SLMPD, and concurs with its assessment and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that construction of a new police station is a major
investment for the South Lake Minnetonka community; and
:~
WHEREAS, to facilitate timely construction, commitments need to be made to provide
organizational security for the SLMPD, and to provide for the financial security of all current
member cities of the SLMPD;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Shorewood, that it
commits the City of Shorewood to the construction of a new building for the South Lake Minnetonka
Police Department. The City Council makes this commitment with the following findings and
conditions:
1) The City Council concurs with the decision of the SLMPD Coordinating Committee to .
proceed with planning needed for the construction and financing of a new police station. This
station would be constructed with the Excelsior Fire District's west fire station, in order that a
central South Lake Minnetonka public safety center may be created.
2) The City Council acknowledges that the SLMPD has authority to enter into necessary
agreements regarding long-term financing of the facility.
3) The City Council acknowledges that expenses incurred prior to long-term financing will be
the responsibility of the SLMPD (and, in turn, of the member cities). It expects that these
expenses will be reimbursed to the SLMPD when long-term financing for the project is
arranged and secured.
.
.
2
4) For the financial stability of the SLMPD and its member cities, and in order to obtain the most
favorable terms for long-term financing, the Joint Powers Agreement for the South Lake
Minnetonka Police Department will need to be amended. The City Council will agree to the
following substantive amendments:
a)
That the duration of the agreement will be extended at least to coincide with the
retirement of financing for the project.
That each member city will be required to meet the annual payment obligations for
financing of the project on an ad valorem basis: that is. on its percentage of combined
tax capacity of the member cities.
That authority for the award of the contract to construct the facility will be granted by
the SLMPD Coordinating Committee after receiving an affirmative vote of each of the
Councils of the member cities.
That the above-stated amendments would be effective upon award of the contract to
construct the facility.
b)
c)
d)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Shorewood declares it takes this
action to ensure the most effective and economical long-term provision of one of the fundamental
local government services - public safety - for both the City and the larger South Lake Minnetonka
community.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that this resolution supersedes Resolution No. 01-072, which was
approved on November 5,2001.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 26TH day
of November, 2001.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
Rationale for ad valorem basis for new SLMPD station
As a joint powers organization, the South Lake Minnetonka Police Department is paid for by the four
cities that own it - Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay. The cost allocations for
police services are contained in the joint powers agreement. Over the years, several factors have
been used to determine cost allocations. Nearly all of the formulas included the ''use of service" as a
factor. After nearly 30 years of historical data, the four city councils agreed last year to allocate costs
on a set percentage. To a greater or lesser extent, these percentages reflect the degree to which each
city uses police services.
At the time that the cost allocations were set, it was not foreseen how quickly there would be
recognition and agreement for a new police station. There has been discussion about the most
appropriate~ equitable basis on which to allocate the cost for this new community asset.
Historically~ community assets have been paid on an ad valorem basis; that is, on the taxable value of
property (currently called "tax capacity" in Minnesota). Cities levy taxes for new buildings (e.g.~ city
halls), counties levy taxes for new buildings (e.g., libraries~ jails), and school district levy taxes for
new schools. Under the ad valorem basis, community assets are fmanced (at least theoretically) on a
property owner~s ability to pay. These facilities are paid for on the basis that they are equally
available to properties (and, by extensio~ the people on them~) throughout the community, not on the
basis of how often people use the services in the building.
.
In the case of the SLMPD station, it is a facility that will be available equally to every property, every
resident, every business, and every visitor in the four cities its serves. It is an asset of the one South
Lake Minnetonka community. Few people will ever hope to use the services of this facility;
however~ all residents will expect to have the facilities available for themselves and SLMPD staff
whenever they are needed. Accordingly~ it is appropriate to look to something other than "use" as the
basis to pay for this facility. One approach that would be consistent across the broad community is
the ad valorem approach.
With an ad valorem approach, the cost for each city will vary from year to year, depending on how
much property values change relative to the other cities. But this is consistent with the ability-to-pay
theory in ad valorem: if a city's share in the annual cost to retire the debt increases, the police
services to protect its properties is worth more.
.
The Excelsior Fire District is phasing in a cost allocation schedule that becomes entirely ad valorem
over ten years. An ad valorem approach to funding the SLMPD station would be consistent in the
way that the multi-city, single community would pay for its public safety facilities.
.
.
Increase(Decrease
Cost Per City for Cost Per City for Cost to City Using
% Per City Using $190,000 Bldg. % Per City Using $190,000 Bldg. Ad Valorum vs.
City Ad Valorem Per Ad Valorum Current Formula Current Formula Current Formula
Excelsior 14.82% $28,165.33 29.47% $56,000.00 ($27,834.67)
Greenwood 9.16% $17,400.40 8.53% $16,200.00 $1,200.40
Shorewood 58.43% $111,012.10 46.00% $87,400.00 $23,612.10
T onka Bay 17.59% $33,422.17 16.00% $30,400.00 $3,022.17
100% $190,000.00 100% $190,000.00
.
Tax Impact Analysis
Comparison of tax impact upon a $250,000.00 EMV home in Excelsior and
Shorewood. * Assuming a $190,000.00 annual Debt service for an SLMPD Facility.
Current before Current formula Ad Valorem
Bldg Debt with Bldg Debt with Bldg Debt
Excelsior City Taxes $874.37 $924.68 $892.90
(+$50.31 ) (+$18.53)
Shorewood City Taxes $802.58 $823.30 $830.15
(+$20.72) (+$27.57)
Tonka Bay $451.04 $474.42 $477.33 .
(+$23.38) (+$26.29)
Greenwood $511. q $535.07 $537.29
(+$23.96) (+$26.18)
(based on 2002 proposed tax levy of each city)
* Median BMV single-family residential house: Excelsior - $201,000; Shorewood - $249,000;
Tonka Bay - $313,000; Greenwood -$431,000
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Craig Dawson, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Public ~S IJA-
November 20, 2001 /
FROM:
..
DATE:
BE:
Discussion Regarding the Glen Road-Amlee Road Drainage Project
On the previous City Council agenda there appeared the item for the presentation of the preliminary
feasibility report for the Glen Road - Amlee Road drainage project. WSB and Associates, Inc
prepared this report. Prior to the actual City Council meeting, it was discovered that the alternatives
proposed for the Glen Road - Amlee Road drainage area are in conflict with some of the goals and
objectives of other projects
Concurrent with this project is the County Road 19 Intersection Realignment Project, and the
Gideon Glen Project. All of these projects are tributary to the same stormwater outlet, which
ultimately drain to Gideon Bay of Lake Minnetonka.
.
Since that time, several meetings have occurred between the Mayor, Joe Lugowski, property owner,
representatives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and WSB and Associates, Inc. Through
the discussions of these meetings, it has been determined that each project may stand on it's own
merits. However, the proposed correction for the subject area is indirect conflict with the County
Road 19 Intersection Realignment Project, and the Gideon Glen Project.
Staff continues to work through the issues. However, at this time it is undeterminable when the final
resolution of these issues will be met. Mr. Lugowski, representative for the neighborhood, has been
present at most of the meetings and is beil1g kept apprised of the issues.
Staffwill continue to update the City Council as to the progress of the project.
:iF9/f
ft
~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER