110501 Handout
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
o
~
~
Smithtown Road
H.~~,'"i"~ ;
Rehabilitation
for the
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
WSB Proj. No. 1074-58
Submitted to:
City of Shorewood
P.O. Box 9105755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
October, 2001
~
WSB
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis. MN 55422
qD
& Associates, 1m:.
763-541-4800
FAX 763-541-1700
INFRASTRUCTURE ... ENGINEERS ... PLANNERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Feasibility Report
for
Smithtown Road Improvements
for the
City of Shorewood
City Project No. 01-07
WSBProject No. 1074-58
October 27, 2001
Prepared by
WSB & Associates, Inc.
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
(763) 541-4800
(763) 541-1700 (fax)
October 27, 2001
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331 ~8926
Re: Feasibility Report
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report which addresses the improvements to
Smithtown Road from the city limits at the west end, east approximately 13;600 linear feet
to the west side of Country Club Road. The report looked at several options, inc1udingan
overlay, reclamation and also the addition of a drain tile system. There are no utility
improvements proposed with tIus project.
We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at (763) 287-7195 if you have any questions or comments regal."ding
this report. .
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
David E. Hutton, P.E.
Associate
co
Minneapolis. St. Cloud. Equal Opportunity Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Certification
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
~~~-
David E. Hutton, P.E.
Date: October 27, 2001
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Lic. No. 19133
I
I
Table of Contents
I
1.
Executive Summary ......................... .............................. ................... .................. Page 1
I
2. Introduction .................... .........................................~....... .................................... Page 1
I
2.1
2.2
2.3
Au tho rization .. .... ............................... ......................................... ... ....... Page 1
Scope .................................................................................................... Page 1
Data Available ..... .............................................. ...... ........................ .... Page 2
I
3. General Backgro und................... ................................. ......... ....................... ....... . Page 2
I
4.
Proposed Imp ro v emen ts................ ......... ...... ......... ... .................... ...................... Page 3
I
I
I
5.
Financing ................ ... ...... ........................ .... ......................................... ............... Page 6
3.1
3.2
Project History................. ....... ... ..............._..... ............... ..................... Page 2
Existing Conditio os............. .................. ... ......... .... ......................... ..... Page 2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Streets............... ............ ...................... ...... ........................ .................... Page 3
S boulders. .................. ................. ............................. ... ........ .................. Page 5
Draio Tile..... ............... ................... .... ................... ... ............................ Page 5
Miscellaneous... ........................... ......... ...... ......... ... ................ .............. Page 5
Permits .......................................................... ......... ...... ........ ..... ........... Page 6
5.1 Opinion. of Probable Cost............................~...................................... Page 6
5.2 Funding ............ ........................ .... ........ .................. ........... ..... .............. Page 7
5.3 Right-of- Way ..................................,..................................................... Page. 7
5.4 Phasing. ......................... ........ ....................................... ........................ Page 7
I
I
6.
Preliminary Sch ed ole ..... .......................... ............ ...................... ...... ............. ..... Page .8
I
7.
Feasibility and Recommendation ...................................................................... Page. 8
I
Figures
Appendix A.......... ........ ... .......... ..... ...... ....... ... ... ... .......... .......... ..... ... .... ............. ..... ... .... Page 10
I
Appendix B............ ...... ..... ............. ...... ....... ... .......... ...... .............. .......... ................... .... Page 11
Opinion of Probable Cost
I
I
I
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road ImprQvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Executive Summarv
Smithtown Road has experienced pavement deterioration to the point that normal
maintenance activities are no longer sufficient. The City of Shorewood has requested
that WSB & Associates prepare a feasibility report exploring the costs and benefits of
street rehabilitation methods.
This request investigates two methods, namely overlaying the road or pavement
reclamation. Overlaying simply places a 1-2 inch layer of bituminous pavement over the
existing asphalt. Reclamation consists of grinding off the existing paving and mixing it
with the existing gravel to make a good base, and then paving the road with 4 inches of
new asphalt.
The reclamation option is more expensive (approximately 62% more than an overlay),
but provides a more permanent, longer lasting road. An overlay typically extends the life
of a road 7-10 years while a reclaiminK would extend the life 12-15 years. In addition,
with a reclamation project, there is more oppo~unity to correct minor deviations in the
grade and slope. This alternative is recommended.
Both options would utilize ll-foot driving lanes with a 2-foot and 4-foot shoulder. The
overlay option is estimated at $770,200 while the reclamation option is $1,000,300. The
project includes the addition of drain tiles the entire length for an estimate of $273,000
and epoxy pavement markings for a cost of $22,000. The project would be funded 100%
by the Municipal State Aid account.
This project is proposed to be designed over the winter and constructed in 2002.
This project is feasible, necessary and cost effective from an engineering viewpoint and
should be constructed as proposed herein.
2. Introduction
~.1 Authorization
The City of Shore wood has authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the
rehabilitation of that segment of Smithtown Road between the west city limits to Country
Club Road. The project is anticipated to be constructed as a Municipal State-Aid project
in 2002.
2.2 Scope
The proposed project consists of the improvements of Smithtown Road from the city
limits on the west end, to the west side of Country Club Road. Two rehabilitation options
were studied. Option #1 includes overlaying the existing roadway. Option #2 includes
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the reclamation and re-paving of the existing roadway. It is recommended that II-foot
driving lanes, with a 2-foot shoulder on one side and a 4-foot striped shoulder be used.
None of the proposed improvement options will alter the existing road profile. Because
of the designation as Municipal State Aid Roadway, Smithtown Road must be
constructed according to current State Aid Standards. The city may be required to ask for
variances to the standards based on-the fact that the improvements will not change the
profile. >
2.3 Data Available
In preparing this report, all or portions of the following Sources of information were
utilized:
(1) City of Shorewood Topographic Maps
(2) City of Shorewood Parcel Maps
(3) Color Aerial Photography as supplied by Hennepin County
No field survey work was authorized or utilized.
3. General Background
3.1 Project History
Smithtown Road is an existing Municipal State Aid street that runs from the southern city
limit line between Lake Minnetonka and Lake Virginia, north and east across the City of
Shorewood. It is the main east-west corridor across the western end of the city. Several
years ago a water main system was constructed in Smithtown Road. Several trenches for
the main and service laterals have settled creating an uneven travel surface. The roadway
profile, for the most part, follows existing terrain.
3.2 Existing Conditions
3.2.1 Streets
Smithtown Road is an older roadway of varying paved widths. It varies from
approximately 22 feet wide to about 28 feet wide, with a median width of about
25 feet. There is no concrete curb and gutter. The preliminary roadway geometry
and profile, as prepared from the available topography plans, has one horizontal
curve and several vertical curves that do not meet the MnlDOT State-Aid
Standards. The general condition of the roadway is fair to poor. The existing
right-of-way width varies considerably over the length of the project area. There
are several areas along the north side of the roadway with no recorded public
right-of-way. Where the full right-of-way exists, it is 66 feet wide.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.2 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain
The existing watermain in and along Smithtown Road is approximately 5lh years
old and should be in very good condition. The existing sanitary sewer is in
unknown condition. It is highly recommended that a televised inspection of the
sanitary sewer mains be done prior to when the proposed roadway improvements
are constructed so any needed repairs can be coordinated with the road work.
3.2.3 Storm Sewer
Drainage along Smithtown Road is almost entirely handled by roadside ditches,
although many of them have been filled in. There are a few existing cross
culverts.
3.2.4 J>rivate lltilities
Private underground utilities consisting of telephone, gas, electric and cable TV
are located in and along different stretches of Smithtown Road. It is anticipated
that only minimal adjustments, if any, will be required to the existing private
utilities.
4. Proposed Improvements
4.1 Streets
This feasibility report investigates two different options for the proposed improvement of
Smithtown Road. Further, Smithtown Road was divided into two segments for estimated
cost purposes. Segment #1 runs from the City limits to the west side of Eureka Way,and
includes about 9,020 linear feet of roadway. Segment #2 starts at the west side of Eureka
Way and runs to the west side of Country Club Road, just north of City Hall. Segment #2
includes about 4,572 linear feet. The total length for both segments is 13,592 linear feet.
Both options will follow the existing horizontal and vertical alignments with some minor
alignment and/or grade changes to bring more of the roadway up to the minimum State
Aid Standards. A full field survey would be required prior to final design to determine
exactly where the existing roadway does not meet the minimum requirements and where, ,
if possible, grade or alignment changes could be made to allow more of the improved
roadway to meet the 30 MPH minimum design speed requirements.
Both options utilized a rural section (i.e. no curb and gutter) to match the existing
roadway design. Two II-foot driving lanes, with a 2-foot striped shoulder and a 4-foot
striped shoulder for a total pavement width of 28 feet is proposed.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General assumptions used in the Opinion of Probable Cost for both options include:
a) Minimum or no changes in alignment or grades.
b) Transitions into driveways and at intersections with existing roadways
would be minimal and incidental to the construction cost. No driveway
reconstruction or overlay was provided for.
c) Option #2 (reclamation) does include saw cutting across each existing
roadway at intersections to allow for a better pavement joint and a
smoother transition.
Option #1
Option #1 includes the placement of a bituminous leveling course to provide an even base
and to rebuild the crown where required. For estimating purposes, a I-inch leveling
course was assumed. The entire road would then be overlayed. A two-inch (2") thick
bituminous wearing course is anticipated.
Option #2:
Option #2 would involve a bituminous pavement reclamation process, which consists of
pulverizing and mixing of the existing bituminous pavement structure with the existing
aggregate base, so as to produce a homogenous dense graded aggregate base. This
process results in a longer service life of the rehabilitation over an overlay process.
Additional aggregate base-class 5 (100% crushed rock) would be added as-needed to
create a minimum of six inches (6") of base and to shape the roadway crown.
Bituminous pavement would be placed in two 2-inch courses to create a 7-ton roadway.
If the project is ordered, soil borings should be performed to determine the soil bearing
strength and the depth of the existing aggregate base. The proposed road section would
then be revised if necessary.
State Aid VarianceslExceptions:
Typical horizontal and vertical curve design for a proposed State-Aid street must meet
the requirements for a 30 MPH design speed. The horizontal curve near the West end
and near the intersections with Boulder Bridge Circle and Boulder Bridge Drive currently
does not meet this requirement. There are also several places along the existing roadway
where the vertical curve grades do not meet the State-Aid design. A meeting was held
with the State Aid office to present the argument that the intention of the proposed road
improvements are to provide the best road possible with the minimum of disturbance.
The proposed project is not a road reconstruction project, and even though stretches of
roadway do not meet the State-Aid standards, they should be exempted from State Aid
design criteria, yet still eligible for State Aid financing. The State Aid office agreed and
indicated that they would consider this a rehabilitation project and therefore it would not
need to meet the 30 mph standard.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2 Shoulders
The report recommends a 2-foot striped shoulder on one side and a 4-foot striped
shoulder on the other. The minimum shoulder width required by MnlDOT is 2 feet.
4.3 Drain Tile
Since there is no clearly defined ditch system, it is recommended that a drain tile system
be installed along both sides of the road. The proposed drain tile consists of a 4-inch
perforated pipe wrapped in a geotextile fabric, in a 12-inch wide trench, filled with course
rock.
4.4 Miscellaneous
a) Street Signs
It is possible that some street signs may need to be salvaged, relocated or
replaced as part of this project. It is assumed that city maintenance crews
would do this, so no costs were included.
b) Utility Poles
If shoulders are added to the road, it is possible that some utility poles
may need to be relocated. These relocation costs would be born by the
utility companies.
c ) Wetlands
There may be some existing wetlands adjacent to the roadway. It is
assumed by this report that no wetlands would be impacted by this project.
This should be verified as part of the design process.
d) Existing Ditches
Since this project is generally a maintenance project, the cost estimate
does not include any costs for any extensive ditch work or corrective
action for drainage issues, with the exception of adding the drain tile
system.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.5 Permits
It is anticipated that no permits would be required for either the overlay option or the
reclamation option. The construction of gravel shoulders may require permits from one
or more of th~Jollowing agencies:
· Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).. .NPDES
· Minnesota Creek Watershed District (MCWD).. .Erosion Control Permit
· Minnesota Creek Watershed District (MCWD).. .Stormwater Management Permit
It is recommended that a preliminary wetlands investigation be performed prior to the
start of any design work on the proposed shoulders.
5. Financinfl
5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost
A detailed opinion of probable cost is included in Appendix B of this report. The opinion
of probable costs includes a 10% contingency and 30% indirect costs. The indirect costs
include legal, engineering, and administrative costs associated with the project. The
project costs are summarized as follows:
A. Streets
Segment #1 (west end)
Segment #2 (east end)
Total Roadway
Option #1
Bituminous Pavement
Overlay Option
$511,200
$259,000
$770,200
Option #2
Reclamation & Bituminous
Pavement
$664,900
$335,400
$1,000,300
The costs can be broken down as follows:
1. Street Construction
2. Drain Tiles/Sodding
3. Pavement Striping
Totals
Overlay
$475,200
$273,000
$22,000
$770,200
Reclamation
$705,300
$273,000
$22,000
$1,000,300
Unit Prices
Cost per LF for Street
Construction Only
Cost for Drain Tile
$34.96/LF
$1O.00/LF
$51.89/LF
$10.00/LF
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.2 Funding
It is anticipated that 100% of the funding on this project will be provided through
Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. The city could elect to use their local road fund, but
the MSA fund has a greater balance and the local road fund should be saved for non-State
Aid roads. Special Assessments are not proposed to be used on this project.
5.3 Right-of- Way
WSB had previously completed a right-of-way survey and map for Smithtown Road.
. Portions of the road haye full right-of-way 66 feet wide; other segments have partial
right-of-way. This analysis indicated that only 76 out of a total of 136 parcels have
provided a legal, half right-of-way for the road (33 feet per parcel). The remaining 60
parcels do not show any legal right-of-way, but rather there is probably a "prescriptive"
easement over those parcels. By virtue of maintaining the road, the city has obtained a
prescriptive easement over the portion maintained. Even with that, the city should
consider securing all remaining legal right-of-way to a minimum width of 66 feet to
ensure all future improvements of Smithtown Road cannot be questioned.
WSB had previously prepared a parcel map showing all right-of-way needs. The City
Attorney, and staff should discuss the issue of obtaining all remaining right-of-way.
5.4 Phasing
While the costs are broken up into two segments, it is recommended that the project be
bid as one project to obtain the best bid prices.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6. Preliminarv Schedule
City Council Accept Feasibility Study/
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications ................. .........November, 2001
Neighborhood Meeting * ....................,......................... ...... ....December, 2001
Plan/Specification Preparation and Mn/DOT Approval ............. ..Nov 2001- Feb, 2002
City Council Approve Plans and Specifications
and Authorize Advertisement for Bids ..... ............. ... ...... ........ .... ... ...Feb, 2002
Receive Bids ... .......... ....... ... ............. .... ..... ..... .......... ......... .....March, 2002
Award Contract.. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . April, 2002
Completion of Street Improvements...... ......... .................. ... ... ....May-July, 2002
* Note: . Since no assessments are to be utilized, a formal, legal public hearing is not
required. The Council may want to obtain input through a more informal neighborhood
meeting process.
7. F easibilitv and Recommendation
The Smithtown Road Improvements Feasibility Report presents two options. Option #1
consists of placement of a bituminous leveling course and a bituminous wear course over
the existing roadway. Option #2 consists of reclamation of the existing pavement and
placement of four-inches of bituminous pavement to build a 7-ton rural roadway. Both
options could include the addition of paved shoulders and drain tile.
The total estimated cost of Option #1 is $770,200. The total estimated cost for Option #2
is $1,000,300. The current total balance in the City's Municipal State Aid Account is
$1,700,000. This balance is available to complete this project, even with the other
County and State projects underway.
The most cost-effective option from an engineering prospective would be option #2,
reclamation of the existing bituminous paving. This option would result in a quality
roadway with an expected design life of 12-15 years. Option #1, Overlaying the existing
paving would have a design expectancy of 7 -1 0 years. WSB & Associates recommends
option #2, the reclamation option.
This project is necessary to decrease maintenance costs, create a safer driving surface and
increase rideability.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvements (reclamation) is
considerably less expensive than a total reconstruction and utilizes recycled products.
This project is feasible in that it will extend the life of the street and the City has the
available funds in their Municipal State Aid account.
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, :MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix A
Figures
Feasibility Report
City of Shore wood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
'"
I "0
0
,
g
/'
'"
0
I Q)
LL
/'
00
I.C)
,
....
r--
I \2
0
/'
E
I
Reel
p
RD.
"letonka
ok.
iTA
~39
133. HALLGREN CT.
<),
~"z;;c"
..
WSB
Project Location Map
WSB Project No. 1074.58
Date: October, 2001
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota
Figure Number
763-541-4800
FAX 763-541-1700
& Associates, lnc.
1
.1~1.1'f.'KI'R'_.lJr"IIIIIr_.~["I~I..:'''''''''''_II.!1~Ii'I.r..'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION
66' R/W *
<(
WIDTH VARIES
11' TO 14'
WIDTH VARIES
11' TO 14'
EXISTING
DITCH
)>
EXISTING
DITCH
4" - 5" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
EXISTING 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE
C
0>
-0
I~
/'
UJ
o
I~
..;-
"
I~
I
* - FULL RIGHT OF WAY IN PLACES, OTHER SEGMENTS HAVE PARTIAL RIGHT OF WAY
(SEE 4/28/00 CITY OF SHOREWOOD STAFF MEMO)
TYPICAL SECTION
WSB Project No. 1074-58
...
WSB
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota
763-541-4800
FAX 763-541-1700
& Associates, lnc.
.1~I.r#a."'R'[""lf"~.LI["I~I..f"'''''''II.l:tLlIt:'I.=CW
Date: October, 2001
Figure Number
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0>
1J
I I")
0
,
~
/'
[I)
0
I Q)
lL
/'
CO
tD
,
V
"
I S?
0
/'
E
I
PROPOSED PAVEMENT SECTION
66' R/W *
<(
)>
STRIPED
SHDR
2'
II'LANE
II'LANE
STRIPED
SHDR
4'
o
I NDSU I
2" 2340 TYPE 41A BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
23ST BITUMINOUS TACK COAT
2" BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE
235T BITUMINOUS TACK COAT
RECYCLE EXISTING 4" BITUMINOUS WITN 4"-6" EXISTING
AGGREGATE BASE FOR USE AS NEW AGGREGATE BASE
* - FULL RIGHT OF WAY IN PLACES, OTHER SEGMENTS HAVE PARTIAL RIGHT OF WAY
(SEE 4/28/00 CITY OF SHOREWOOD STAFF MEMO)
& Associates, lnc.
763-541-4800
FAX 763-541-1700
TYPICAL SECTION
Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Dale: October, 2001
.A.
WSB
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
Figure Number
.1~llIr"!""".R'I"I'lr""'''''[''UllllUI:'''''''_II''.1UI~I.=''''''
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. DRAIN TILE DETAIL
ROADWAY SURFACE
Course Filter Aggregate
MnDOT 3149.2H
2" min.
4" perforated pipe
geotextile wrap <3733, Type 1)
W
MAX.
TRENCH DET AIL
1/4"0 Hole
typical
c
D1
-0
I~
/"
"'
o
I~
,
.0-
r--
I~
I
.
WSB
4150 Olson Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
763-541-4800
FAX 763-541-1700
& Associates, Inc.
.1"llH.,A.....R.l....II.....~[..I"I.llr~...II..!1tll~l.rJ...
Geotextile Fabric
(Mn/DOT 3733, TYPE 1)
Perforated PVC, or Dual Wall
smooth interior corrugated PE pipe.
Meeting MnDOT 3278
---
"
/ "
/~'
1600
PIPE DET AIL
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Date: October, 2001
DRAIN TILE DETA!
Smithtown Road
Shorewood, Minnesota
Figure Number
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix B
Opinion of Probable Costs
Feasibility Report
City of Shorewood, MN
Smithtown Road Improvements
City Project No. 01-07
WSB Project No. 1074-58
Page 11
I
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I
OPTION., 1 . OVERLAY OF SMlTHTOWN ROAD
WSB PROJECT NO. 1074-58
SEGMENT., 1 . WEST END FROM CITY LIMITS TO EUREKA WAY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION.
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAX.)
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V
2350.501 TYPE LV 41 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2;
2350.502 TYPE LV 31 NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (LEVEL COURSE)
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
2502.541 6" PERFORATED PE PIPE DRAIN COMPLETE
2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX. WATER
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)
2564.603 4" SOLfD liNE WHITE - EPOXY
2564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW. EPOXY .
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN, INC. TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER
OPINION OF PROBABL:E COSTS
UNIT EST QTY EST COST
LS
CU.YD.
TON
TON
TON
GAL
LlN. FT.
EACH
EACH
LIN.FT.
LIN.FT.
. so. YD.
1
500
1,100
3.400
1,700
3,920
18,040
28
35
17,400
8,460
6,100
SUBTOTAL
+10% CONTINGENCY
SUBTOTAL
+30% INDIRECT COSTS
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS. SEGMENT ., 1 .. WEST END
I
SEGMENT., 2. EAST END FROM EUREKA WAY TO COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAX.)
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V
2350.501 TYPE LV 41 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2")
2350.502 TYPE LV 31 NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (LEVEL COURSE)
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
2502.541 6" PERFORATED PE PIPE DRAIN COMPLETE
2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)
2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPOXY
2564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPOXY
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN, INC. TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER
$16,300.00
$7.50
$10.00
$34.00
$32.00
$1.25
$6.00
$150.00
$300.00
$0.30
. $0.60
$3.00
TOTAL EST
COST
$16,300.00
$3,750.00
$11,000.00
$115,600.00
$54,400.00
$4,900.00
$108.240.00
$4,200.00
$10,500.00
$5,220.00
$5,076.00
.$18,300.00
$357,486.00
$35,748.60
$393,234.60
$117,970.38
$511,204.98
TOTAL EST
UNIT EST QTY EST COST COST
LS
CU. YD.
TON
TON
TON
GAL
L1N. FT.
EACH
EACH
L1N. FT.
L1N. FT.
so. YD.
1
250
555
1,725
863
1,990
9,144
8
20
8,904
4,332
3,100
SUBTOTAL
+10% CONTINGENCY
SUBTOTAL
+30% INDIRECT COSTS
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS. SEGMENT., 2 - EAST END
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS
NOTES:
1. Assumed average width existing roadway = 25'.
2. Proposed roadway width = 28'
3. Assumed average level course depth of 1".
4. Length of road - Segment # 1 - West End = 9,020 LF
5. Length of road - Segment # 2 - East End = 4,572 LF
6. Total Length of road = 12.592 LF
7. Assume 40' break in striping at each intersection.
$8,300.00
$7.50
$10.00
$34.00
$32.00
$1.25
$6.00
$150.00
$300.00
$0.30
$0.60
$3.00
$8,300.00
$1,875.00
$5,550.00
$58,650.00
$27,616.00
$2,487.50
$54,864.00
$1,200.00 .
$6,000.00
$2,671.20
$2,599.20
$9,300.00
$181,112.90
$18,111.29
$199,224.19
$59,767.26
$258,991.45
$770,196.43
I
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
OPTION # 2 . RECLAMATION AND PAVING OF SMITHTOWN ROAD
I
WSB PROJECT NO. 1074-58
SEGMENT # 1 . WEST END FROM CITY LIMITS TO EUREKA WAY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2021.501 MOBilIZATION (5% MAX.)
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION
2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUS HED ROCK)
2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION
2350.501 TYPE LV 41 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2")
2350.502 TYPE LV 31 NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2")
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT-
2502.541 6" PERFORATED PE PIPE DRAIN COMPLETE
2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER
2350.502 . ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)
2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPOXY
2564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW. EPOXY
2575.505 SODDING. TYPE LAWN. INC. TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
TOTAL EST
UNIT EST QTY EST COST COST
LS
CU. YD.
LF
TON
sa YO
TON
TON
GAL
LIN. FT.
EACH
EACH
LIN. FT.
L1N. FT.
sa. YD.
1
500
800
4.150
25,060
3.400
3.400
1,410
18.040
28
35
17,400
8,460
3.050
SUBTOTAL
+10% CONTINGENCY
SUBTOTAL
+30% INDIRE CT COSTS
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS - SEGMENT # 1 - WEST END
SEGMENT # 2 - EAST END FROM EURE.KA WAY TO COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
2
3'
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAX.)
.2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION
2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V
2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION
2350.501 TYPE LV 41 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2")
2350.502 TYPE LV 31 NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2")
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
2502.541 6" PERFORATED PE PIPE DRAIN COMPLETE
2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX . WATER
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)
2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPOXY
2564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW. EPOXY
2575.505 SODDING. TYPE LAWN, INC. TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER
$22,100.00
$7.50
$5.00
$10.00
$1.00
$34.00
$32.00
$1.25
$6.00
$150.00
$300.00
$0.30
$0.60
$3.00
$22~iOO.oo
$3,750.00
$4,000.00
$41,500.00
$25,060.00
$115,600.00
$108,800.00
$1,762.50
$108,240.00
- $4,200.00
$10,500.00
$5.220.00
$5,076.00
$9,150.00
$464,958.50
$46.495.85
$511,454.35
$153,436.31
$664,890.66
TOTAL EST
UNIT EST QTY EST COST COST
LS
CU. YD.
LF
TON
sa YO
TON
TON
GAL
LIN. FT.
EACH
EACH
LIN. FT.
L1N. FT.
sa. YD.
1
250
800
1,340
12.700
1.725
1,725
715
9,144
8
20
8.904
4,332
3,100
SUBTOTAL
+10% CONTINGENCY
SUBTOTAL
+30% INDIRE CT COSTS
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS. SEGMENT # 2 . EAST END
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS
NOTES:
1. Assumed average width existing roadway = 25'.
2. Proposed roadway width = 28'
3. Assumed average level course depth of 1" .
4. Length of road - Segment # 1 - West End = 9,020 LF
5. Length of road - Segment # 2 - East End = 4.572 LF
6. Total Length of road = 12,592 LF
7. Saw cut across each existing intersection.
8. Assume 40' break in striping at each intersection.
$11,200.00
$7.50
$5.00
$10.00
$1.00
$34.00
$32.00
$1.25
$6.00
$150.00
$300.00
$0.30
$0.60
$3.00
$11,200.00
$1,875.00
$4.000.00
$13.400.00
$12,700.00
$58,650.00
$55,200.00
$893.75
$54,864.00
$1,200.00 ,
$6.000.00
$2.671.20
$2.599.20
$9,300.00
$234,553.15
$23,455.32
$258.008.47
$n,402.54
$335,411.00
$1,000,301.66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_.-
OVERLAY DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Assume 25' existing roadway width
Provide 28' wide Improved roadway
West End
common excavate ;:;9020' x 3'wide x 0.5' deep/ 27 ;:;
aggregate base =(9020' x 3'/9) x 6" x 105# x 1.15/2000
paving wear =(9020' x 28'/ 9) x 2" x 110# x 1.1/2000
paving level =(9020' x 28'/ 9) x 1" x 110# x 1.1/2000
tack coat =(9020' x 25'/9) x 0.1 gal + (9020' x 28'/9) x 0.05gal
double yellow striping =9020'
white outside lane striping =2 sides x 9020'
sodding ;:;2 sides x 9020' x 3' wide/9
East End
common excavate =4572' x 3'wide x 0.5' deep/ 27 =
aggregate base =(4572' x 3' / 9) x 6" x 105# x 1.15/2000
paving wear =(4572' x 28'/9) x 2" x 110# x 1.1/2000
paving level =(4572' x 28'/9) x 1" x 110# x 1.1/2000
tack coat =(4572' x 25'/9) x 0.1 gal + (4572' x 28'/9) x O.OSgal
double yellow striping =4572'
white outside lane striping =2 sides x 4572'
sodding =2 sides x 4572' x 3' wlde/9
RECLAMATION & PAVING DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Assume 25' existing roadway width
Provide 28' wide improved roadway
West End
common excavate =9020' x 3' wide x 0.5' deep/ 27
saw bit paving ;:;16 Intersection x 24' avg width
aggregate base =(9020' x 3' / 9) x 6" x 105# x 1.15/2000
aggregate base =(9020' x 25' / 9) x 2" x 105# x 1.15/2000
reclamation =9020' x 25' wide/9
paving wear =(9020' x 28'/ 9) x 2" x 110# x 1.1/2000
non-wear course =(9020' x 28'/ 9) x 2" x 110# x 1.1/2000
tack coat ;:;(9020' x 28'/9) x 0.05gal
double yellow striping =9020' - (14 Intersections x 40')
white outside lane striping =(2 sides x 9020') - (16 intersections x 40')
sodding =2 sides x 9020' x 3' wide/9
East End
common excavate =4572' x 3'wide x 0.5' deep/ 27 =
saw bit paving =6 intersection x 24' avg width
aggregate base =(4572' x 3'/9) x 6" x 105# x 1.15/2000
aggregate base =(4572' x 25'/9) x 2" x 105# x 1.15/2000
reclamation =4572' x 25' wide/9
paving wear =(4572' x 28'/9) x 2" x 110# x 1.1/2000
paving level =(4572' x 28'/9) x 1" x 110# x 1.1/2000
tack coat =(4572' x 28'/9) x 0.05gal
double yellow striping =4572' - (6 intersections x 40')
white outside lane striping =(2 sides x 4572') - (6 intersection x 40')
sodding ;:;2 sides x 4572' x 3' wide/9
-
-
501.11 Cu. Yds.
1,089.17 Tons
3,395.53 Tons
1,697.76 Tons
3,908.67 Gals.
9,020.00 Un. Ft.
18,040.00 Un. Ft.
6,013.33 Sq. Yds.
254.00 Cu. Yds.
552.07 Tons
1,721.10 Tons
860.55 Tons
1,981.20 Gals.
4,572.00 Un. Ft.
9,144.00 Un. Ft.
3,048.00 Sq. Yds.
501.11 Cu. Yds.
384.00 Un. Fl.
1,089.17 Tons
3,025.46 Tons
25,055.56 Sq. Yds.
3,395.53 Tons
3,395.53 Tons
1,403.11 Gals.
8,460.00 Un. Ft.
17,400.00 Un. Ft.
6,013.33 Sq. Yds.
254.00 Cu. Yds.
144.00 Un. Ft.
552.07 Tons
1,533.53 Tons
12,700.00 Sq. Yds.
1,721.10 Tons
1,721.10 Tons
711.20 Gals.
4,332.00 Un. Ft.
8,904.00 Un. Ft.
3,048.00 Sq. Yds.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
road widen
road widen
2" course
avg, 1" course
0.1 Gal./Sq. Yd. on exist road + 0.05 Gal./Sq. Yd. Overlay
assume no breaks at Intersections
assume no breaks at tntersectlons
road widen
road widen
2" course
avg. 1" course
0.1 Gal./Sq. Yd. on exist road + 0.05 GaIJSq. Yd. Overlay
assume no breaks at intersections
assume no breaks at Intersections
road widen
at each Intersection
road widen
additional 2" for shaping roadway(if req'd)
2" wear course
2" non-wear course
0.05 gal/sq yd
assume 40' break at 14 intersections (2 cross)
assume 40' break at 16 Intersections
road widen
at each Intersection
road widen
additional 2" for shaping roadway(if req'd)
(
2" wear course
2" non-wear course
0.05 gal/sq yd
assume 40' break at 6 intersections
assume 40' break at 6 intersections
c/vl,{(A'/,n