The URL can be used to link to this page

062501 CC Reg AgP "" "1 " , CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2001 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love_ Garfunkel Lizee Zerby _ Turgeon _ B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 11,2001 (Att.-#2A Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: 1 I NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. A. Verified Claims List (Att.-#3A Claims List) B. Authorization to Advertise for two Assistant Liquor Store Manager positions (Att.-#3B Finance Director's memorandum, Liquor Store Manager's memorandum) C. Russell Zoning Appeal (Att.-#3C Planning Director's memorandum) 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held June 12,2001 (Att.-#5A Draft Minutes) B. Naming ofthe South Shore Community Park (Att.-#5B Proposed Resolution) 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative 7. GENERAL .." . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - June 25, 2001 Page 2 of 2 8. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Report on Barricades at Freeman Park B. Update on Shorewood Ponds Subdivision C. Lake Linden Drive (Att-#8C Engineer's memorandum) D. Request from Residents for No Boat Trailer Parking on Merry Lane (Att.-#8D Planning Director's memorandum) E. Update on Glen Road Area Drainage (Att.-#8E Public Works Director's memorandum) F. Request for No-Parking Zone on St. Alban's Bay Road (Att.-#8F Proposed Resolution, Public Works Director's memorandum) 9. REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. Gideon Glen 2. Skate Park 3. Eddy Station 4. County Road 19 Intersection B. Mayor & City Council 10. ADJOURN > . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us . Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, 25 June 2001 A 6:00 p.m. Liquor Committee Meeting is scheduled prior to the Council Meeting this evening. . ~ \.. Agenda Item #3A: Enclosed is the Verified Claims List for Council approval. Agenda Item #3B: The Liquor Committee recommends authorization to hire two (2) new Liquor Assistant Managers, due to difficulty hiring and retaining good p8.11-time help. Agenda Item #3C: This resolution is a formal denial of James Russell's appeal regarding the need for a variance to replace the foundation on the house at 26080 Birch Bluff Road. Although there will only be three Council members present on Monday, a simple majority of those present is sufficient to adopt the resolution. If any questions arise, relative to the resolution it is suggested that it be continued to the 9 July meeting. . Agenda Item #5B: At its May 8 meeting, the Park Commission made a motion to recommend to Council the name "South Shore Community Park" for the new park, which is home to the Skate Park. Approval of the resolution requires a simple majority vote by Council. Agenda Item #8A: Staff is still in process of receiving feedback from emergency service providers regarding Freeman Park barricades recently placed. Staff will be reporting at the next City Council meeting regarding this item. Agenda Item #8B: Substantial progress has been made in bring the Shorewood Ponds site into compliance. Mr. Bill Gleason has requested to be heard during Monday night's meeting to request that a portion ofthe letter of credit be returned for work,completed. Agenda Item #8C: Staff will be updating the City Council as to the plans previously completed for the Lake Linden Drive realignment. Staff is recommending that an open house style forum be conducted to query residents for additional feedback for Lake Linden Drive. ... t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER \ . . Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of 25 June, 2001 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item #8D: Residents of Christmas Shore have requested that something be done to alleviate overflow parking from the Merry Lane public boat access. Staff suggests that the street be posted, including the cul-de-sac, with "No Boat Trailer Parking" signs. This will allow the residents and their guests to park on the street when necessary without having to get some sort of parking permit from the City. Adoption of the enclosed resolution requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #8E: Mr. Joe Lugowski, petitioner for the Glen Road Drainage project requested that this item be moved to the next City Council meeting when a full council is present. Agenda Item #8F: Staff is recommending that a "No Parking" zone be established in the proximity of the South Shore Community Park to minimize activity outside the park site and to keep sight-lines clear for pedestrians entering and leaving the park. No Parking zones are established by resolution. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 11,2001 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS '7:00 P.M. MINUTES t)\l.~fl 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Council members Garfunkel, Lizee, Zerby, and Turgeon; Administrator Dawson; Attorney Keane; Engineer Brown; Finance Director Burton; and Planning Director Nielsen. Absent: None . B. Review Agenda Garfunkel moved, Lizee seconded, approving the Agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 29, 2001 Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded, approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of May 29, 2001, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA . Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, approving the Motions contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein: A. Motion Approving the Verified Claims List Motion passed 5/0. 4. PRESENTATIONS With Councils permission, Mayor Love moved these items to appear after Item 6. A. Presentation of A ward to Former Planning Commissioners for their Service ~m the Planning Commission B. Report From Jeff Foust, City Representative to LMCC 5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none. 1F~1/ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11,2001 Page 2 of 12 6. HEARINGS A. Shorewood Ponds Development Mayor Love delayed the hearing until 7:30 P.M. anticipating the arrival of the Shorewood Ponds Development Representative. 7. PARKS Engineer Brown reported that there would be a Park Commission Park Tour followed by a Regular meeting on June 12. On the Regular Meeting Agenda, there will be discussion over the non-payment of some sports organization user fees. Mayor Love questioned how these issues would be handled. Brown indicated that most sports organizations are up-to-date, however, one in question has a roster shortage and will be followed up with. Brown also shared with the Council the resignation of Park Commissioner Berndt. 4B. PRESENTATIONS. Report From Jeff Foust, City Representative to LMCC . Representative Foust provided the Council with an update from the Cable Commission, as well as, welcomed comments on utilizing some of the technology embedded within the cable system. He reported that the rebuild of the Shorewood cable system is complete. It will provide better quality via fiber optics to every neighborhood. Foust went on to explain that Lake Minnetonka Community Cable has requested the ability to broadcast their Council Meetings live using one of the community channels provided by MediaCom as set forth in the franchise agreement. He then asked for input from the Council on their going live as well. Council Member Lizee asked what requirements or special equipment would be needed to do so. Foust indicated that while there is no money in the LMCC budget to allocate for this, the cable company must supply three to four channels to the community for such efforts. With no objection, Mayor Love asked Foust to proceed by putting together a feasibility report and present the costs to the Council next month. . Foust also reported upon the availability of an I-Net service for the City as provided by MediaCom within the franchise agreement. While not a free service to government, it can provide a way to connect public buildings using MediaCom cable lines. Zerby inquired about the opportunity to fill in content on the public community channel between live Council Meetings rather than only broadcasting billboards. He wondered if this wouldn't be a good way to broadcast public service announcements and rebroadcast taped community events. Foust believed this could be programmed but more research would need to be done. 4A. Presentation of A ward to Former Planning Commissioners for their Service on the Planning Commission Mayor Love recognized three past Planning Commissioners for their service and commitment to the Community. With an eye to the future, these members and staff have met every week to ~I CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11,2001 Page 3 of 12 ensure that an orderly process in which citizens can be heard, applicants can voice their desires, and a reasoned recommendation can be made is followed. Mayor Love recognized Kirk Rosenberger, Tom Skramstad, and Paula Callies, thanking them for their hard work and dedication to the community they served. Tom Skramstad addressed the Council stating that he appreciated the unexpected recognition and that it was a pleasure, as well as a learning experience, to serve the community. Kirk Rosenberger thanked the City and said that he takes with him many fond memories from his time there. He shared a number of things he learned. First, if there is a piece of bare ground it will likely be developed sooner or later; second, as a Commissioner you must balance the neighborhood concerns with the developers concerns; and finally, that variances truly do not fit within ordinances. 6. HEARINGS . A. Shorewood Ponds Development Mayor Love began the Hearing at 7:30 P.M. without a representative present. Engineer Brown stated that a letter had been sent out by certified mail to the developer, Bill Gleason of Sylvia Development, listing the items in default. It included ten items that were in specific violation of the original development agreement executed between the City of Shorewood and Sylvia Development on June 28, 1999. While not a public hearing, the notice given to the Developer provided them until May 31, 2001 to correct the items found in violation. As not all of the items were corrected, the Council hearing was scheduled for this evening, June 11,2001. Brown reported that staff is in the process of drawing upon a letter of credit with Wells Fargo, the holder in San Francisco, California. Staff has also met with several contractors to obtain bids for completing the items that stand in default. . Engineer Brown maintained that it is staff's recommendation that any further issuance of permits or inspections cease on the project as further motivation to correct the situation. He had. no specific recommendation in regard to the proposed $1,000 per violation monetary penalty at this time. Brown pointed out six specific items that still remain in violation to the agreement. The six items areas follows, although some effort has been made by the developer to install silt fencing. 1. General site condition 2. Erosion Control Measures 3. Storm sewer capacity has been compromised 4. Washing of Berm and stabilization 5. Sedimentation on the Roadways 6. Pond side-slopes CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 4 of 12 !. With no representation from Sylvia Development present, Mayor Love asked for Council comment. Council member Turgeon felt it was not unreasonable to hold up permits and inspections, especially in light of no representation on behalf of the developer. Mayor Love questioned what the $1,000 penalty per infraction would accomplish. Brown reasoned that drawing upon the letter of credit would motivate the developer and builder to comply due to the costliness to them and their note holder. Brown shared that the dollars held in account by the letter of credit are 1.5 times the original project cost and represent a substantial cost to the developer. At 7:35 P.M. Bill Gleason arrived as the representative for Eagle Crest Homes and Sylvia Development. Mr. Gleason shared that after walking the development with Engineer Brown and reviewing the letter he received, he believed that they had complied with the items at that time. Gleason maintained that some of the issues addressed in the letter which include the ponding, knocking down the weeds and regrading, and sodding have just not been possible with the inclement weather conditions so far. He believed that the silt fencing and tree protection was now up and felt uncertain what more could be done. . While Mayor Love was sympathetic to the weather problems encountered this spring, he reiterated that these conditions are the precise reason why such strong erosion controls are stipulated, to prevent the types of problems they are currently facing. With this in mind, he added that the condition of the site poses concerns to both he and the neighbors who have contacted him. Engineer Brown reported that the most serious infraction involves the ditching along the west side of the property which has not been done yet. Residents have pointed out to the City that some of the heavy rains that fell this spring have not been handled by the storm sewer system and have flowed towards their neighborhoods and allegedly caused some issues with their structures. Brown stated that the most serious issue is to get the storm sewer system running the way it should, including control over erosion into the sedimentation basin, making sure the side slopes are stabilized, and checking that erosion control fencing is properly anchored. Brown maintained that clearly there are problems communicating these issues between the two groups involved, the builders/contractors and developer. While Brown admitted he noticed that attempts had been made to control erosion, the very next day the builder came back in and tracked mud into the street, knocked down silt fencing, supplied no gravel entrances, moved dumpsters where they don't belong, and the site is back in a state of disrepair within days. Brown supplied documentation that this has been an ongoing problem and that he has continually been after the developer to clean up the site and control erosion. . Bill Gleason pointed out that he has walked the site with Engineer Brown and corrected the catch basin and silt fencing issues. He added that they have ordered the ditching to be done but it has not yet been completed, and he will speak to his engineering department about this. He maintained that today was the first day he has had a team at the site to grade the properties where foundations have been laid due to inclement weather. Until the ground dries out, he continued, little can be done physically to get people in there to finish the jobs Engineer Brown has identified on the list. He questioned what more could be done and insisted that no matter who the CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11,2001 Page 5 of 12 City hired to finish the jobs, they too, would not physically be able to do so until the area dries up. They have been fighting the battle all spring of keeping the street clean, the bales up and keeping stuff from eroding. He was at a loss and asked what the City would do differently than he has already done to complete these items. Brown pointed out that during the walk with Mr. Gleason, they werein the midst of a week of dry weather and there was an opportunity to correct some of the major problems he had identified, including the ditching. Mr. Gleason pointed out that this was a fairly new issue to him that he had only learned about during his walk with Engineer Brown. There are two agencies, Eagle Crest Homes and Sylvia Development, involved with the project and Westwood Engineering who works for the developer did not relay this issue to him. Garfunkel questioned how these agencies are connected and whom Gleason represents. Gleason maintained that while he works for Eagle Crest Homes, he is also representing Sylvia Development. He felt even with this distinction, th,ey have done what they can so far to meet the demands of the City. . Mayor Love, while noting the unusual spring, upheld the belief that the conditions that are on the site and the issues that have brought concern to our citizens, staff and council people have been out there on the table for at least a month or longer. With that being said, Mayor Love stated that the current conditions are not good for the neighbors or the environment, and that the site is unsightly. He continued that, frankly, the City has not seen responsiveness on behalf of representatives of the development. It seems the confusion between the various agencies does not answer the concerns the City and its citizens have brought forward. Council member Turgeon observed that the construction crew is not playing by the rules. She believed more patrolling of the site needs to be done and asked what control Mr. Gleason has over the crew. Gleason pointed out that the construction crew is made up of a variety of subcontractors who are almost out of their control. He added that after. they leave, his team cleans up the site, including their own street sweeper, but there is a time frame required to accomplish this task. Gleason stated that while the City is free to take the letter of credit out, it is not going to really change anything. He believed that the conditions they're facing have to change first, although he can try to do a better job cleaning the streets. . Zerby inquired as to whom is present on site to keep the contractors in line. Gleason said there is a job Supervisor who comes out daily, in the mornings usually, and then there is his clean up team and street sweeper who finish up the day. Gleason shared with the Council that some subcontractors are better than others and respect the efforts taken on site to control various conditions. Mayor Love asked the Council what a~tion they would like to take at this time. Brown pointed out that at the last City Council meeting they drew upon the letter of credit and scheduled this hearing to determine what, if any, further action would be taken, i.e. impose monetary penalties of not more than $1,000 per infraction, order stop work orders on all construction for which building permits have been issued and withhold issuance of additional building permits, and take any other action to enforce any other remedy available. Planning Director Nielsen pointed out that additional permits could be delayed. Gleason stated that they are currently behind on the project as it stands and even that delay would not make much difference. Turgeon expressed her concern over getting a subcontractor to do the work any CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 6 of 12 sooner, seeing how many of them are backed up already with the weather and work. She did add, however, that she was extremely disappointed in the site and that the City's expectations were much higher. She then suggested giving the development company the opportunity to continue in good faith granting them an additional ten to fourteen days to comply with the notice. Turgeon moved, Zerby seconded with discussion, to give Shorewood Ponds an additional two weeks to meet staffs request that the storm sewer system be cleaned, and the ditching be done to meet capacity and specifications. During that period of time, staff will look for a subcontractor to be hired by the City if these items are not corrected at the end of the two- week period. Attorney Keane pointed out that the City Council meets in two weeks, and that the letter of credit can be pulled without using the money in order to hold the development company accountable. In the meantime, the City can articulate the performance they expect in the next two weeks and look for a subcontractor to do the work if need be. Keane noted that the direction to the developer is clear at this point and at the next meeting if they haven't performed up to Engineering standards, the City can exercise their conditions as put forth levying fines, withholding permits, etc. No further hearings or notices would be necessary. Gleason requested an opportunity to meet with staff once again, and throughout the process, to clarify any outstanding concerns. He still voiced his concern over weather related items such as the topsoil, seeding/sodding, grading, and tree protection. All things that he felt could not be done until the weather improved. He again stated that he felt his agencies were progressing the right way and he will do his best to get the rest of the work done within the next two weeks. . Mayor Lave suggested inviting a representative from the MCWD to accompany staff and Sylvia Development on the next walk through of the site. He then underscored that the problems encountered with Shorewood Ponds are not simply caused by a wet spring, but that accountability has not been present for long period of time. Motion passed 3/2, with Garfunkel and Mayor Love dissenting. 8. PLANNING Commissioner Gagne reported that the Planning Commission met twice last week, during the first of which they discussed the application for Cub Foods. After a 5-1/2 hour public meeting the application was turned down unanimously 7/0. Mayor Love added that it was not so much the Cub Foods proposal that was turned down as it was the size of the site the proposed tenant was presenting. He reminded citizens that there will be a grocery store development at that site sooner or later. . Gagne went on to report that items B, C, D, and E of this evening's Agenda were also all approved 7/0. Gagne presented one other matter the Planning Commission would like the City Council to consider, that is the possibility of allowing staff to look into solutions for correcting Lake Linden Drive. Many neighbors have voiced their concern over the street as it is and would like to hear about the possibility of connecting it. Mayor Love asked Engineer Brown to look into this subject further and report back. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 7 of 12 A. A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare a Resolution Regarding an Appeal to the Zoning Administrator's Interpretation of the Zoning Code Appellant: James Russell Location: 26080 Birch Bluff Road Director Nielsen provided background, adding that the appeal was to have been voted on two months ago but since it required a 4/5 vote, this is the first meeting in which that was possible. Mayor Love invited James Russell to provide the City Council a brief report regarding his appeal. Mr. James Russell, 26080 Birch Bluff Road, explained that the stakes to him are a 39 square foot side yard encroachment. He gave examples to support his claim th.at letters band j of the Ordinance are in direct conflict with one another. Mr. Russell insisted that it is unclear whether the drafters of the Ordinance could be using the same reasoning for nonconforming uses as they do for structures. . Lizee pointed out to the Council that the single issue before the Council this evening is to decide whether Mr. Russell needs to apply for a variance or not. After initially applying for and withdrawing his application for a variance last winter Mr. Russell is appealing the need for it. Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, forwarding this to a variance process and replacing the findings of fact label "cabin" to "summer house". Mayor Love inquired whether the word change was necessary and saw no legal distinction to do so, finally, asking Lizee to modify her request. Zerby supported the variance process and indicated he would like to see a variance request in this case. He maintained that he believed the intent of the drafters in 1986 was not to let the cabin fall to the ground. Garfunkel asserted that he viewed this request as a "reasonable repair" and not a "significant structural alteration". With this in mind, he saw this as not an out of the ordinary request to repair his building from collapsing. . Turgeon pointed out that this is a "nonconforming structure" and that the City and Planning Commission have required other unique nonconforming structures to follow a variance request procedure as well. Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded, denying the appeal to the Zoning Administrator's Interpretation of the Zoning Code asking Mr. Russell to follow through on the variance request. Motion passed 4/1, with Garfunkel dissenting. B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space over 1200 sq. ft. Applicant: Brian Zeglen Location: 5960 Mton Road Director Nielsen provided background on this matter, noting that the applicant wished to construct a detached garage, which when combined with existing accessory space will bring the property to approximately 1328 square feet; thus, a request for a Conditional Use Permit became CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 8 of 12 necessary. He also reviewed the four criteria to be met in order to grant this type of permit. He recommended the CUP be granted subject to several criteria, including the proposed garage be used strictly for residential use only, a landscape plan be submitted and approved, and the existing overhead garage door be replaced by a wall. Mr. Zeglen was available for questions. Turgeon moved, Lizeeseconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-031, "A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space over 1200 Square Feet for Brian Zeglen, 5960 Afton Road". Motion passed 5/0. C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space over 1200 sq. ft. Xpplicant: Richard Penn Location: 27825 Brynmawr Place Once again, Director Nielsen provided background on this matter, pointing out that the applicant is building an addition to his existing attached garage, which when combined with his accessory space brings his total on the property to approximately 1494 square feet; thus, a request for a Conditional Use Permit became necessary. Nielsen noted that the applicant's lot contains approximately 55,347 square feet of area, and that the total area of accessory space will not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R I-A Zoning District. . Nielsen recommended approval for the Conditional Use Permit noting that a lower level entrance request reflected in the slide that was shown was withdrawn. The approval would also be subject to a landscape plan. Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-032, "A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space over 1200 Square Feet for Richard Penn, 27825 Brynmawr Place." Motion passed 5/0. D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Revised Conditional Use Permit for Church Storage Building. Applicant: Minnewashta Church Location: 26710 West 62nd Street . Director Nielsen provided history that the applicant had been granted a Conditional Use Permit several years ago to construct a new church and two-stall storage garage on the site. They are requesting to build a three-stall storage building on the same spot that would house the trash facilities. Nielsen noted that staff recommends approval of the Permit providing the Applicant legally combines the two parcels on which the Church is currently located and the trash facilities are located within a masonry enclosure on a concrete pad. Lizee moved, Zerby seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-033, "A Resolution Approving a Revised Conditional Use Permit for Church Storage Building for Minnewashta Church, 26710 West 62nd Street". Motion passed 5/0. , CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 9 of 12 E. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Revised Conditional Use Permit for the Kuempel Chime Clock Property Applicant: Mary jean McGregor Location: 21193 Minnetonka Boulevard Director Nielsen explained that the Applicant proposes to lease space within the existing building for an office and instructional video studio, requiring a modification of previous Conditional Use Permits. Turgeon moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-034, "A Resolution Approving a Revised Conditional Use Permit for the Kuempel Chime Clock Property for Mary Jean McGregor, 21193 Minnetonka Blvd. Motion passed 5/0. F. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Final Plat and Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Enter Into a Development Agreement . Director Nielsen explained that a Final Plat has been submitted by Smithtown Woods. He noted omitted language giving the developer a credit back for over sizing the water main that runs through the property needs to be added. Hie recommendation is to approve the final plat. Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 01-035, "A Resolution Approving a Final Plat and Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Enter Into a Development Agreement with Smithtown Woods." Motion passed 5/0. G. Report on Dugouts/Bench Shelters at Freeman Park Mayor Love reported that he met with representatives of South Tanka Little League regarding the request for an extension until August 10th to make the dugouts at Freeman Park comply with the requirements. The original deadline for reconstruction was June 11, 2001 before the extension request. . Brian Tichy, of South Tonka Little League, explained that the existing dugouts are not complete and merely a temporary fix, requiring additional time to complete. He stated that organizing the necessary volunteers required to finish the dugouts has proven difficult, and he would like to continue using them as they are, finishing the season by extending the permit. Although Mayor Love appreciated the need for more time, he shared a memorandum he received from Joe Pazandak that day pointing out safety concerns over the existing dugout structures. Due to the possibility of high winds lifting the roofs off and posing potential safety issues, Mayor Love could not support the extension. He was saddened to see the report, in light of all that South Tonka has worked to accomplish, and encouraged them to keep the lines of communication open and schedule a meeting between the City, South Tonka Little League, Parks, staff, and himself soon. Tichy voiced his disappointment over the lack of support they feel the City has provided them. In view of the investment that South Tonka Little League has put into the City Park they feel there is little appreciation, communication or support. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 10 of 12 , 9. GENERAL A. Final Report on the Community Visioning Project - Bruce Chamberl~n, Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. Craig Dawson introduced Bruce Chamberlain, Vice-President of Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. (HKGi) to present a final report on the scoping phase for Shorewood's Community Visioning Process. Dawson indicated the report would encompass the Outreach Plan, Work Plan, project schedule, and fee proposals. In his presentation, Mr. Chamberlain summarized the Outreach Plan consisting of the Community Involvement Strategy and the Communication Strategy. Along with the Community involvement strategy. the Communication strategy will include brochures and a photo analysis of the Community through the resident's eyes. The Lawless Institute will handle the Communication Strategy. Chamberlain estimated the costs for the overall project would run $42,000-43,000, plus printing and distribution costs which can run about $10,000. While he was aware that the budget goal was around $35,000-40,000, he believed some economizing could be done by printing in house, using city staff, and cutting down on scale. . Mayor Love inquired as to how bringing in additional Lakes communities would impact the costs. By combining the effort into a joint community visioning process. Chamberlain indicated that the costs would not be greatly affected. More people would be used for the sample size and costs would increase slightly for printing and distribution, but the overall visioning 'process however, would not be greatly altered. Garfunkel asked how the sample demos were chosen. Peggy Lawless, of the Lawless Institute, indicated that via a stratified random sampling they would choose 20 some residents from specific demos, along with a few businesses and organizations. Garfunkel emphasized the importance of not steering the results. He felt it was important for the City to be sensitive to this and merely supply a list of existing businesses and groups to HKGi to choose from. Mayor Love suggested presenting the visioning process to the area Chambers of Commerce to excite their interest early on and encourage their potential participation. Chamberlain agreed that it would be a stronger scenario to involve more communities. Zerby volunteered to assist in the presentation to the other City's, similar to those in which they gave while soliciting support for the Skate Park. . Chamberlain asked for a timeline. Mayor Love suggested he hold off on further initiatives until the City could immediately move forward sharing the visioning process with other communities. They would hope to move forward by early fall. B. Approval of Fire Services Agreement with the City of Mound Dawson reported that over the past number of years an annual fire services contract has existed between the Cities of Mound and Shorewood. Within the past few weeks, the City has received a new fire service agreement containing a few changes, thus, requiring action for the Shorewood City Council. .." .. ," . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 11 of 12 Other than a few minor changes to the contract, there was one exception Dawson referred to: the proposed agreement would be in effect for three years (2001 through 2003) rather than for only 2001. The agreement would also automatically renew for another three years, unless a one-year notice was given to cancel it. Zerby moved, Turgeon seconded, recommending approval of the Fire Services Agreement with the City of Mound. Motion passed 5/0. 10. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS Engineer Brown reported that barricades have gone up at Freeman Park. Turgeon expressed her concern that the barricades have made it impossible for emergency vehicles to get through. She asked what other possibilities exist, for instance, gates etc. Zerby .noted that the current park entrance points to the South entrance and that there are no proper markings leading people through the senior center. Nielsen suggested staff contact the police and fire departments about having a lock box installed at a gated entrance for emergency use. 11. REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff 1. Gideon Glen Representative to the MCWD, Craig Dawson, reported that letters have been sent out to the new Gideon Glen Advisory Committee about the neighborhood group. With no objection, Zerby added the name of Peter Ciccico, who lives at the end of Christopher Road, to the neighborhood member list. 2. Skate Park Brown reported that all the equipment has been installed and the grading is finished. Mayor Love asked if signage was complete, and pointed out minor issues, such as litter need to be addressed. Mayor Love thanked staff, and especially Engineer Brown, for their huge success in accomplishing the huge burden of installing the equipment. 3. Eddy Station Brown indicated that the sod is down and that they await the completion of final details. He added that the vending machines are on site. Lizee passed along the numerous positive comments she has received regarding Eddy Station. It is spectacular. 4. County Road 19 Intersection Brown reported that WSB Associates, the City's Consulting group, is currently putting together a proposal that he hopes to have to present to Council soon. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 11, 2001 Page 12 of 12 <" .. .. , B. Mayor & City Council Mayor Love had nothing to report. 12. ADJOURN Lizee moved, Zerby seconded, adjourning the Regular City Council Meeting of June 11, 2001, at 10:10 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson, Recording Secretary Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: . Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator . Check Approval List for 06/25/01 Council Meeting Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 30553 BROWNING FERRIS IN JUNE SVCS 6/14/01 05001-0200 $47.94 TOTAL FOR BROWNING FERRIS IND. $47.94 30554 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF REGION IV MCFOA MTG 6/14/01 $25.00 TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR-CITY OF $25.00 30555 G & K SERVICES PW UNIFORMS 6/14/01 053101 STM $615.29 TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES $615.29 30556 HENN CTY TREASURE POSTAL VERI FICA TION 11/13/00 - 5/ 6/14/01 $153.12 TOTAL FOR HENNCTYTREASURER $153.12 30557 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES ADDL COPIES DIRECTORY OF MN 6/14/01 $68.46 TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $68.46 30558 LEEF BROS MATS FOR TB L1Q 6/14/01 484202 $29.44 TOTAL FOR LEEF BROS $29.44 30559 MCFOA MEMBERSHIP RENEW 7/1/01 - 6/30/ 6/14/01 $35.00 TOTAL FOR MCFOA $35.00 30560 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 6/14/01 60985126 $148.65 . TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $148.65 30561 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER 6/14/01 52006806013 $8.63 TOTAL FOR MINNCOMMPAGING $8.63 30562 MINNETONKA REFRIG CLEAN OUT DRAIN-TB 6/14/01 $60.00 TOTAL FOR MINNETONKA REFRIGERATION $60.00 30563 MN CITY/CTY MGMT AS ANNUAL DUES 6/14/01 $77.00 TOTAL FOR MN CITY/CTY MGMT ASSN $77.00 30564 MN SUN PUBLICATION ORDINANCE 371 6/14/01 423262 $57.20 30564 MN SUN PUBLICATION 2000 DRINKING WATER REPT 6/14/01 423587 $386.10 TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS $443.30 30565 NORTH STAR ICE 6/14/01 10115306 $42.60 30565 NORTH STAR ICE 6/14/01 10115307 $43.20 30565 NORTH STAR ICE 6/14/01 79115604 $15.00 TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $100.80 . 30566 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV BOARDING JUNE 6/14/01 $60.71 TOTAL FOR PAWS, CLAWS & HOOVES PET $60.71 30567 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 MAY PREMIUMS 6/14/01 $2.60 30567 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 MAY PREMIUMS 6/14/01 $64.55 30567 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 MAY PREMIUMS 6/14/01 $35.10 30567 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 MAY PREMIUMS 6/14/01 $2.60 30567 PRUDENTIAL INS CO 0 MAY PREMIUMS 6/14/01 $2.60 TOTAL FOR PRUDENTIAL INS CO OF AMERICA $107.45 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 969425-00 $10.00 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 970962-00 $259.80 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 970981-00 $115.96 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 970981-00 $548.02 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 970983-00 $1,146.02 30568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/14/01 970985-00 $92.95 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $2,172.75 3~ 30569 SCHWAAB, INC INK PADS FOR FINANCE SIGNATUR 6/14/01 H07328 $16.08 TOTAL FOR SCHW AAB, INC $16.08 30570 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPA ORDINANCE 371 6/14/01 535 $40.58 TOTAL FOR SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPERS INC $40.58 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 30571 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 2ND HALF JUNE INV 6/21/01 $180.00 30571 ANDERSON, KRISTI B. 2ND HALF JUNE INV 6/21/01 $180.00 TOTAL FOR ANDERSON, KRISTI B. $360.00 30572 BOYER TRUCK PARTS FUEL PUMP/RABS VALVE 6/21/01 279393 $562.63 TOTAL FOR BOYER TRUCK PARTS $562.63 30573 CAHNERS BID AD HWY 7/41 6/21/01 1760514 $163.00 TOTAL FOR CAHNERS $163.00 30574 CHAMPION AUTO STO U-JOINT 6/21/01 D91474 $9.57 TOTAL FOR CHAMPION A UTO STORE #344 $9.57 30575 CITY COUNTY CREDIT 06/19 PAYROLL 6/21/01 $350.00 TOTAL FOR CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION $350.00 30576 COMMERCIAL ASP HAL HOT MIX 6/21/01 061501 STM $543.73 TOTAL FOR COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. $543.73 30577 CULLIGAN BOTTLED W 6/21/01 051169 $45.57 TOTAL FOR CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER $45.57 30578 DEPUTY REGISTRAR # FORFEITED VEHICLE REGISTRATIO 6/21/01 $27.00 TOTAL FOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR #59 $27.00 30579 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/21/01 795685 $869.15 . TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $869.15 30580 GOPHER STATE ONE-C MAY SVC 6/21/01 1050670 $47.20 30580 GOPHER STATE ONE-C MAY SVC 6/21/01 1050670 $47.20 TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, IN $94.40 30581 HERMEL WHOLESALE 6/21/01 298345 $125.97 30581 HERMEL WHOLESALE 6/21/01 298345 $375.12 30581 HERMEL WHOLESALE 6/21/01 298347 $687.72 30581 HERMEL WHOLESALE 6/21/01 298347 $26.55 30581 HERMEL WHOLESALE 6/21/01 298634 ($31.26) TOTAL FOR HERMEL WHOLESALE $1,184.10 30582 HOPKINS PARTS COM FILTERS 6/21/01 45690 $135.37 30582 HOPKINS PARTS COM FILTERS 6/21/01 45691 $114.64 30582 HOPKINS PARTS COM FI L TERS 6/21/01 45692 $96.50 30582 HOPKINS PARTS COM FILTERS 6/21/01 45694 $25.30 TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY $371.81 . 30583 ICMA RETIREMENT TR 06/19 PAYROLL 6/21/01 $1,222.07 TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $1,222.07 30584 J.R'S APPLIANCE DISP SPRING CLEANUP 6/21/01 27462 $968.00 TOTAL FOR J.R'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL $968.00 30585 KAR PRODUCTS MISC PARTS 6/21/01 519594 $808.24 TOTAL FOR KAR PRODUCTS $808.24 30586 LAKESHORE WEEKLY WINE SALE AD 6/21/01 00066077 $156.00 30586 LAKESHORE WEEKLY WINE SALE AD 6/21/01 00066077 $156.00 30586 LAKESHORE WEEKLY WINE SALE AD 6/21/01 00066077 $156.00 TOTAL FOR LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS $468.00 30587 LIGHTNING LEGAL CO 6/21/01 26358 $41.14 TOTAL FOR LIGHTNING LEGAL COURIER $41.14 30588 LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH BOOT ALLOWANCE 6/21/01 $150.00 TOTAL FOR LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH $150.00 30589 MASON, BRADLEY BOOT ALLOWANCE 6/21/01 $99.95 TOTAL FOR MASON, BRADLEY $99.95 30590 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 6/21/01 22859432 $234.80 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 30590 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 6/21/01 61596162 $214.88 30590 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 6/21/01 61908085 $229.59 TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLIN $679.27 30591 MINNCOMM PAGING LB PAGER 6/21/01 68593106013 $276.05 TOTAL FOR MINNCOMM PAGING $276.05 30592 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT. C SCHMID 6/21/01 $173.51 30592 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT - R CARLSON 6/21/01 $119.60 TOTAL FOR MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR $293.11 30593 MTKA GIRLS SOFTBAL REFUND USER FEE OVERPYMT 6/21/01 $70.00 TOTAL FOR MTKA GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSN $70.00 30594 NIELSEN, BRADLEY 2001 EXP JAN - MAY 6/21/01 $26.30 30594 NIELSEN, BRADLEY 2001 EXP JAN - MAY 6/21/01 $33.39 30594 NIELSEN, BRADLEY 2001 EXP JAN - MAY 6/21/01 $408.51 TOTAL FOR NIELSEN, BRADLEY $468.20 30595 NORTH STAR ICE 6/21/01 10116013 $129.60 30595 NORTH STAR ICE 6/21/01 7115909 $32.40 30595 NORTH STAR ICE 6/21/01 87116302 $99.44 TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $261.44 . 30596 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 6/3 - 6/16 6/21/01 $101.29 30596 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 6/3 - 6/16 6/21/01 $2.68 TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $103.97 30597 PERA 06/19 payroll 6121/01 $1,973.62 30597 PERA 06/19 payroll 6121/01 $1,809.77 TOTAL FOR PERA $3,783.39 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 000422-00 ($78.52) 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 001918-00 $446.38 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI . 6/21/01 001918-00 $651.67 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 001919-00 $343.49 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 001919-00 $1,664.34 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 001920-00 $1,086.44 30598 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 6/21/01 001920-00 $343.49 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $4,457.29 30599 QUEST 6/21/01 $129.05 . 30599 QUEST 6/21/01 $261.99 TOTAL FOR QUEST $391.04 30600 SAFEASSURECONSUL ANNUAL SAFETY TRAINING 6/21/01 1 $2,470.00 TOTAL FOR SAFEASSURE CONSULTANTS $2,470.00 30601 SAM'S CLUB 6/21/01 060201 STM $42.84 30601 SAM'S CLUB 6/21/01 060201 STM $42.85 30601 SAM'S CLUB 6/21/01 060201 STM $42.85 30601 SAM'S CLUB 6/21/01 060201 STM $90.00 TOTAL FOR SAM'S CLUB $218.54 30602 STAN MORGAN & ASS COOLER REPAIRS 6/21/01 49382 $540.31 TOTAL FOR STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC $540.31 30603 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/21/01 227936 $36.30 30603 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/21/01 227936 $2,800.05 30603 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/21/01 228028 $11.20 30603 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/21/01 228028 $3,830.60 30603 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/21/01 228029 $2,541.05 TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $9,219.20 30604 US POSTMASTER DOG FECES MAILING 6/21/01 $102.12 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER $102.12 30605 WM. MUELLER & SONS BLACKTOP 6/21/01 060101 STM $7,724.08 30605 WM. MUELLER & SONS SAND FOR SWIWA REPAIR 6/21/01 37342 $71.33 30605 WM. MUELLER & SONS SAND FOR SWIWA REPAIR 6/21/01 37342 $71.34 30605 WM. MUELLER & SONS FILL SAND - MCKINLEY WATER REP 6/21/01 37530 $217.80 TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. $8,084.55 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 0074-000-16 $8.05 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 0191-308-36 $27.68 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 0208-203-56 $51.07 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 0234-748-37 $8.14 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 0640-202-56 $12.18 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 0675-505-16 $16.05 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 0942-567-36 $43.52 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 1350-001-36 $16.66 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 1351-508-06 $686.09 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 1541-203-60 $7.09 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 1641-408-36 $76.44 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 1732-704-10 $2,390.96 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 1776-835-20 $10.81 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 2095-300-56 $2,355.35 . 30606 XCELENERGY 6/21/01 2325-902-36 $37.61 30606 XCEL ENERGY 6/21/01 2397-003-96 $8.89 TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY $5,756.59 30607 ZEE MEDICAL SERVIC MED SUPPLIES 6/21/01 54208182 $66.90 TOTAL FOR ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE $66.90 30608 ADVANCED IMAGING S JUNE CONTRACT SVCS 6/26/01 003371 $166.25 TOTAL FOR ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC $166.25 30609 ARMOR LOCK & ALAR ALARM MONITORING 7/1 - 9/30/01 6/26/01 50127 $145.12 TOTAL FOR ARMOR LOCK & ALARM SVCS $145.12 30610 ASSOC. OF METRO MUAMM 2001 ANNUAL MTG 6/26/01 154 $30.00 TOTAL FOR ASSOC. OF METRO MUNIC $30.00 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 33989600 $16.79 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 33989600 $10.60 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 33989700 $17.19 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 34007100 $20.12 . 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 34007100 $61.13 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 34007200 $11.80 30611 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 6/26/01 3455200 $138.20 TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $275.83 30612 BELLBOY CORPORATI 6/26/01 21459800 $277.93 30612 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 6/26/01 21459900 $677. 70 30612 BELLBOY CORPORATI 6/26/01 21460000 $455.30 30612 BELLBOY CORPORA TI 6/26/01 21506700 $566.87 30612 BELLBOY CORPORATI 6/26/01 21506800 $308.10 30612 BELLBOY CORPORATI 6/26/01 21507000 $552.35 TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $2,838.25 30613 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TAX ID 41-6005142 6/26/01 $250.00 30613 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TAX ID 41-6005142 6/26/01 $250.00 30613 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TAX ID 41-6008060 6/26/01 $250.00 TOTAL FOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO $750.00 30614 CAHNERS BID AD HWY 7/41 6/26/01 1764764 $163.00 TOTAL FOR CAHNERS $163.00 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 30615 CM CONSTRUCTION IN PV #9-FREEMAN PK BLDG 6/26/01 $19,638.26 TOTAL FOR CM CONSTRUCTION INC $19,638.26 30616 COLLINS ELECTRICAL HWY 7 & VINE HILL RD 6/26/01 JR25998 $190.00 TOTAL FOR COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM $190.00 30617 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6/26/01 136796 $656.55 30617 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6/26/01 137005 $289.40 30617 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6/26/01 137006 . $1,266.15 30617 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6/26/01 137554 $442.25 30617 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6/26/01 137901 $328.25 TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $2,982.60 30618 OEM-CON LANDFILL IN CONCRETE WASTE 6/26/01 2111 $61.00 TOTAL FOR DEM-CON LANDFILL INC $61.00 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 796572 $146.70 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 796577 $4,231.20 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 797304 $4,146.45 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 797304 $28.50 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 797305 $9.50 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 797305 $3,454.05 . 30619 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 6/26/01 799616 $1,260.35 TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN $13,276.75 30620 EXCELSIOR CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP 7/1/01 - 6/30/02 6/26/01 1719 $151.00 TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR CHAMBER OF COMM $151.00 30621 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF 2ND OTR 2001 OAK ST SIGNAL 6/26/01 $109.90 TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR-CITY OF $109.90 30622 FIL TERFRESH 6/26/01 51655 $27.00 30622 FIL TERFRESH 6/26/01 51656 $28.50 TOTAL FOR F1LTERFRESH $55.50 30623 GARY'S DIESEL SERVI DOT INSP/BRAKE SHOES/ETC 6/26/01 51869 $175.34 TOTAL FOR GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE 1NC $175.34 30624 GOVT FINANCE OFCRS DUES 8/1/01 - 7/3102 6/26/01 0023003 $130.00 TOTAL FOR GOVT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC $130.00 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385461 $364.89 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385462 $179.90 . 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385467 $621.02 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385468 $179.90 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385493 $321.64 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 385494 $25.70 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 386282 $2,059.82 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 386283 $1,932.07 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 386295 $873.29 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388724 $252.34 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388725 $1,224.98 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388729 $94.29 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388730 $1,010.28 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388738 $26.74 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER &C 6/26/01 388739 $660.81 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 388740 $40.62 30625 GRIGGS, COOPER & C 6/26/01 562538 ($19.65) TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $9,848.64 30626 HAWKINS WATER TRE 6/26/01 OM 58600 $50.00 TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $50.00 30627 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR SVCS OF COUNTY ASSESSOR-2ND 6/26/01 CA2123 $38,1,54.63 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER $38,154.63 30628 HOISINGTON/KOEGLE PROJ SHOREWOOD VISION PV#2 6/26/01 $4,058.12 TOTAL FOR HOISINGTON/KOEGLER GROUP $4,058.12 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261864 $287.99 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261864 $391.05 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261865 $587.43 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261865 $1,107.15 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261867 $16.28 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1261867 $503.10 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263970 $230.60 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263970 $769.60 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263971 $206.05 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263971 $2,264.84 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263973 $131.20 30629 JOHNSON BROS L10U 6/26/01 1263973 $1,181.64 TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $7,676.93 30630 . LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA GENERAL MATTERS 6/26/01 380386 $1,750.00 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUDIT RESPONSE 6/26/01 380387 $113.00 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA LAND USE MATTERS 6/26/01 380388 $75.00 . 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA CITY/GIDEONS TOWNHOMES V ELL 6/26/01 380389 $11,727.63 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA R JOHNSON V CITY ET AL 6/26/01 380391 $487.50 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA TH 7/41 ROW CONDEMNATION 6/26/01 380392 $1,885.00 30630 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER 6/26/01 380393 $1 ,482.50 TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY... $17,520.63 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283193 $1,554.00 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283194 $22.00 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283201 $15.20 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283201 $1,398.75 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283202 $7;75 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 283203 $512.45 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285841 $427.20 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285842 $37.30 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285844 $1,256.60 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285845 $15.50 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285850 $55.95 . 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285850 $724.80 30631 MARK VII 6/26/01 285851 $50.15 TOTAL FOR MARK VII $6,077.65 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118210220 $925.78 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118210220 $4,647.72 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118210220 $366.45 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118210220 $366.45 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118212259 $1,222.21 30632 MEDICA JULY PREMIUMS 6/26/01 10118212545 $1,704.67 TOTAL FOR MEDICA $9,233.28 30633 METRO COUNCIL ENVI JULY WASTEWATER 6/26/01 0000723148 $24,791.80 TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $24,791.80 30634 METRO COUNCIL ENVI MAY SAC CHGS 6/26/01 $12,523.50 TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT $12,523.50 30635 MUNITECH, INC. JULY SVC 6/26/01 7698 $2,550.00 30635 MUNITECH, INC. JULY SVC 6/26/01 7698 $5,950.00 TOTAL FOR MUNITECH,INC. $8,500.00 30636 NAVARRE TRUE VALU CABLE 6/26/01 082043 $105.41 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR NAVARRE TRUE VALUE $105.41 30637 NORTH STAR ICE 6/26/01 07116608 $69.60 TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $69.60 30638 OFFICE DEPOT 6/26/01 130292757-0 $115.27 30638 OFFICE DEPOT 6/26/01 130292757-0 $142.79 TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $258.06 30639 ORONO, CITY OF JUNE ANIMAL CONTROL 6/26/01 1079-01 $1,481.25 TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF $1,481.25 30640 PEARSON BROS. INC. SEALCOATING 6/26/01 357 $45,513.78 TOTAL FOR PEARSON BROS.INC. $45,513. 78 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 3240639 ($124.00) 30642 " PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/013240642 ($12.75) 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725707 $121.00 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725707 $128.35 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725707 $492.60 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725708 $62.00 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725708 $213.00 . 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725709 $87.00 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725709 $62.00 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725710 $133.45 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725710 $236.70 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725710 $951.95 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725712 $224.35 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 725712 $340.58 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727287 $394.80 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727287 $471.75 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727288 $509.00 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727288 $1,877.85 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727290 $138.24 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727290 $471.75 30642 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI 6/26/01 727706 $60.00 TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $6,839.62 30643 PITNEY BOWES CREDI oTRL Y SVC 6/30 - 9/30/01 6/26/01 5440954-JNO $328.02 TOTAL FOR PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP $328.02 . 30644 POTTS, KENNETH N. MAY PROSECUTIONS 6/26/01 $1,608.33 TOTAL FOR POTTS, KENNETH N. $1,608.33 30645 OUEST 6/26/01 $53.38 TOTAL FOR QUEST $53.38 30646 SO LK MTKA POLICE D JULY MONTHLY BUDGET 6/26/01 $44,902.67 30646 SO LK MTKA POLICE D SPEC DETAIL 5/24 - 5/25/01 6/26/01 $211.91 TOTAL FOR SO LK MTKA POLICE DEPT $45,114.58 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228419 $436.80 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228498 $56.00 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228498 $1,529.40 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228599 $3,496.45 30647 THORPE DJSTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228662 $259.00 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228761 $11.20 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 228761 $1,572.65 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 229299 $34.95 30647 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN 6/26/01 229299 $1,534.85 TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $8,931.30 30648 TONKA BAY-CITY OF WATERMAIN LOCATE CR 19 6/26/01 $124.00 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR TONKA BA Y-CITY OF $124.00 30649 TWIN CITY WATER CLI MAY BACTERIA ANALYSIS 6/26/01 7563 $60.00 TOTAL FOR TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC $ 60.00 30650 UNUM LIFE INSURANC JULY PREMIUM L TO 6/26/01 $12.03 30650 UNUM LIFE INSURANC JULY PREMIUM L TD 6/26/01 $13.67 30650 UNUM LIFE INSURANC JULY PREMIUM L TO 6/26/01 $13.96 30650 UNUM LIFE INSURANC JULY PREMIUM l:.TO 6/26/01 $221.11 TOTAL FOR UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO $260.77 30651 W.W. GRAINGER, INC AMP RELAY 6/26/01 495-031815- $26.26 TOTAL FOR W.w. GRAINGER, INC $26.26 30652 WASTE TECHNOLOGY, SPRING CLEAN-UP 6/26/01 44546 $26,522.38 TOTAL FOR WASTE TECHNOLOGY, lNe. $26,522.38 30653 WIDMER, INC. REPAIR WATERMAIN-MCKINLEY CT 6/26/01 4352 $725.00 30653 WIDMER, INC. REPAIR GATE VALVE-COVINGTON 6/26/01 4355 $797.50 TOTAL FOR WIDMER,INe. $1,522.50 30654 WINE COMPANY (THE) 6/26/01 60719 $75.00 TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE) $75.00 30655 WINE MERCHANTS 6/26/01 43405 $112.00 . 30655 WINE MERCHANTS 6/26/01 43406 $553.50 TOTAL FOR WINE MERCHANTS $665.50 30656 WORLD CLASS WINES, 6/26/01 106442 $96.00 30656 WORLD CLASS WINES, 6/26/01 106443 $192.00 30656 WORLD CLASS WINES, 6/26/01 106444 $504.00 TOTAL FOR WORLD CLASS WINES,INC $792.00 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE FREEMAN PK BLDG CONSTR SVCS 6/26/01 01074-374-1 $953.50 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SHOREWOOD PONDS REV 6/26/01 01074-390-1 $240.00 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE NSP WATER SVC CRSG OF CR 19 6/26/01 01074-450-0 $190.11 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SMITHTOWN RD R/W ISSUES 6/26/01 01074-520-0 $280.00 30657 . WSB AND ASSOCIATE OUR SAVIOURS SITE PLAN REVIEW 6/26/01 01074-571-0 $540.00 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SMITHTOWN RD OVERLAY 6/26/01 01074-583-0 $277.50 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE CUB FOODS SITE REVIEW 6/26/01 01074-591-0 $1,902.50 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE 2001 STREET REHAB-RECON PROG 6/26/01 01074-602-0 $2,103.00 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SHOREWOOD PKS SURVEY 6/26/01 01074-611-0 $133.50 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE EDGEWOOD RD CULVERT 6/26/01 01182-00-05 $60.00 . 30657 WSB AND ASSOCIATE MANITOU WOODS 6/26/01 01289-001-0 $2,010.00 TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIA TES $8,690.11 30658 XCELENERGY 6/26/01 0145-009-26 $15.87 30658 XCELENERGY 6/26/01 0408-607-95 $86.72 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 0615-308-36 $3.14 30658 XCELENERGY 6/26/01 0677-702-26 $694.23 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 1285-101-66 $18.19 30658 XCELENERGY 6/26/01 1373-808-26 $7.74 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 1564-303-36 $7.59 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 1605-305-56 $113.91 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 1724-866-54 $92.21 30658 XCEL ENERGY 6/26/01 2001-503-26 $15.11 TOTAL FOR XCEL ENERGY $1,054.71 TOTAL CHECKS $379,461.07 Thursday, June 21, 2001 Page 1 of2 Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date , 216806 STARK BRUCE H 930.29 6/19/01 216807 THURSTON DOROTHY M 214.36 6/19/01 216808 TODD CHRISTOPHER M 194.79 6/19/01 216809 TURGEON LAURA 184.70 6/19/01 216810 ZERBY MICHAEL S 184.70 6/19/01 Total of Checks $28,788.27 . . Thursday, June 21, 2001 Page 2 of2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM Date: June 21, 2001 From: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Bonnie Burton, Finance Director/Treasurer ~ Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator ez>7bb To: . Re: Authorization To Hire Liquor Assistant Managers The Liquor Committee reviewed a request at its May 29,2001 meeting fn;>m Liquor Manager Don Swandby to hire two (2) new Assistant Managers. The attached memo from Don to the Liquor Committee discusses the shortage of good part-time employees for the liquor stores. Employee turnover has become critical. Don's plan is to create two new full-time Assistant Manager positions that would be "floating" or "roaming" positions. That is to say, they would fill inwhere needed and would be available to assist with opening and' closing of the stores, in addition to other duties. The pay range for these positions would be $28,138 - $31,784, depending on qualifications. . The Liquor Committee agrees with Don's request and recommends the City Council authorize advertising for these positions. After suitable candidates have been located, final authorization to hire would be requested from the City Council. Please advise if you have questions or if we can be of further assistance. #'IIit 'o.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -#38 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.ci.shorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us Memo To: Liquor Committee Members From: Don Swandby Date: 5-24-01 RE: Hiring of New Assistant Managers . As we have discussed at previous Liquor Committee meetings I believe that the addition of two new assistant managers would greatly benefit the operation. Also at past meetings I had expressed postponing this action until the status of the' Tonka Bay Store was clearer. It now appears that we wiU continue doing business with Tonka Bay and I feel now is the time to hire. Two more full time management personnel would assure us of covering all thirty-six opening and closing shifts, with the exception of three shifts, with management. Also recently, the already distressed part-time marketplace has worsened~ Within the last month or so we have lost eleven of twenty-one part time employees for various reasons, seven of which at ,~east on oCC9sion were key holders. There obviously would be an increased full-time payroll: however, we would probably reduce the part-time payroll by half. And of course, full-time employees would service our . customers in a more positive way. Also considering our 2000 net operating profit and 2001 's first quarter profits, financially we can afford it. I believe the time is now. n ' ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL BY JAMES RUSSELL REGARDING AN INTERPRETAION OF THE ZONING CODE WHEREAS, James Russell (Appellant) is the owner of real property located at 26080 Birch Bluff Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described as: "The east half of Lot 22, Birch Bluff Upper Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota"; and WHEREAS, the Appellant desires to repair the damaged roof and replace the foundation on the existing dwelling located on the property; and . WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator for the City of Shorewood advised the Appellant that he would need to obtain a setback variance in order to replace the existing foundation on the dwelling; and WHEREAS, the Appellant filed an application appealing the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the Shorewood Zoning Code, which determined that a variance was necessary; and WHEREAS, the Appellant's application was reviewed by the Zoning Administrator and his recommendations have been set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council, dated 1 March 2001; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the Appellant's application for an appeal was reviewed by the Planning Commission on 6 March 2001, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and . WHEREAS, the Appellant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 11 June 2001, at which time the Zoning Administrator's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Appellant's property is located in an R-IC/S, Single-Family Residential/Shoreland zoning district which requires a 35-foot front yard setback, a 35-foot setback on the side yard abutting the Third Street right-of-way, a 10-foot side yard setback on the east side of the lot and a 50-foot setback from the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. It 8c" 2. The Appellant's existing dwelling encroaches into the 35-foot setback from the Third Street right-of-way, constituting a nonconforming structure in the R-IC/S zoning district. 3. The Appellant proposes to raise the existing dwelling from its current foundation and replace the old foundation with a new one. 4. The Shorewood Zoning Code imposes restrictions on the enlargement, extension, or structural alteration.of nonconforming structures. CONCLUSION 1. The City Council has determined that the replacement of the existing foundation constitutes a structural alteration. 2. The City Council concurs with the interpretation of the Zoning Administrator and that the Appellant must obtain a variance in order to replace the existing foundation. 3. The Appellant's appeal is hereby denied. . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of June 2001. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: CRAIG W. DAWSON, ADMINISTRATOR/CITY CLERK . -2- . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING D. ~.'..... ."'.' FT ~~(! ~'A~ . ;;:.~ >,,,,'.I..i,,; .. .. - ilW Ii Chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Chair Arnst; Commissioners Young, Dallman, Bix, Puzak, and Mey~r; City Engineer Brown; and Council Liaison Zerby B. Review Agenda Engineer Brown asked to add Item 10, a discussion regarding the operation of Eddy Station. Puzak moved, Bix seconded, accepting the agenda as revised. Motion passed 6/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of May 8, 2001 Chair Arnst corrected Page 1, Item 4A, the first line to read "..wording of the existing pet policy pamphlet.." and Page 2, Item 4C, line 3 to read "..if they could enforce no parking signs..". Dallman moved, Meyer seconded, approving the Minutes of May 8, 2001, as amended. Motion passed 4/0/2, with Puzak and Bix abstaining. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none. 4. REPORTS A. Report on City Council Meeting of May 14,2001, May 29, 2001 and June 11, 2001 Zerby reported that the City Council approved the installation of vending machines at Eddy Station and to his knowledge they have been installed. The Council also asked South Tonka Little League to take down their temporary dugouts as a safety precaution. As reported by building inspector, Joe pazandak, the dugouts pose a threat to safety if winds were to lift them up and they would collapse on anyone beneath them. Chair Arnst added that there will be a group of City representatives meeting with Brian Tichy, of South Tonka Little League, to discuss efforts to open lines of communication, as well as, how they and the City can work together to improve the park. Zerby continued that there was agreement among the Council to close the access to Freeman Park and barricades were installed. They are investigating other alternatives including the installation of a chain, fence, or gate at that location. Contact will be made with emergency services and the police department to get their feedback on the gate or barricade system. No action was taken. 1t5/t PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2001 Page 2 of 7 .. B. Report on Land Conservation Environment Committee Brown had nothing to report and informed the Commission of Commissioner Berndt's resignation. Brown did, however, relay the concerns voiced by the City Council and neighbors over Lake Linden Drive. He said that staff will be checking into the possibility of trails, with other improvements, which will involve the Park Commission. C. Report on Park Foundation Meeting of May 23, 2001 Dallman reported that the Foundation discussed two potential fundraising opportunities; donor bricks . around Eddy Station and either a Silent Auction or Raffle. They will be meeting once again next week to further discuss these ideas. D. Report on Closure of Reutiman Lane Brown provided history as to why the closure was needed, and added that he has received quite an . outpouring of opposition to its closure. Quite a volatile issue, a petition is circulating to open it back up. He reminded the Commission that with the closure, users of fields one and two at Freeman are required to use Park Drive thru theShorewood Ponds development. Bix questioned the reception of Shorewood Ponds to this additional traffic. Brown noted that they realize that the traffic associated with the closure is less than they would see if the road remained open. More people would be using them as a cut through and speeding to do so. Brown reported, as Zerby already had, that contact with emergency services will be made before further action is taken. E. Update on Eddy Station Brown was pleased to report that the building has only minor touch ups left. The building has been painted and sealed, the sod is in and grading is being finished. In fact, Brown pointed out, the contractor himself was at the sight daily and off-hours to ensure the job was complete pending a strike by many . trades people. Brown reported that the vending machines are in and the City should be seeing its first statement in mid August. They are now merely awaiting the recycling bins. F. Update on Skate Park Installation and Activities Already having been addressed, Brown asked for any additional comments. Young asked for a time frame for the no parking signage to arrive. Brown replied that once he's made contact with the neighbor across the street, the No Parking signs will be posted within 5 days, however, the overflow parking sign will need to be special ordered and may take several weeks. Brown added that these will all need to be added to the City Council Consent Agenda during their next meeting in two weeks, so that would be a better gauge for installation. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 Page 3 of 7 s. REPORT ON FINDINGSIEXPERIENCES WITH NO PARKING AND DOG FECES FROM DEPUTY CHIEF NIELING Chair Arnst reported that the pet policy brochure has been updated and the articles have appeared in the Lakeshore Weekly. She asked the Commission if they still wanted the mailings to go out to pet owners and was unsure whether the information made it into school envelopes. Bix felt the mailing was useful and would promote the dog walking community to police itself. There was a general consensus to send the pieces out. Brown also believed that the school inserts went home as well. Chair Arnst then questioned whether the City Ordinance should be revised to require pet owners to carry along baggies and mitts. Puzak noted, however, this would be difficult to enforce, especially if an owner already used and disposed of their baggies. . Chair Arnst was pleased with the number of responses received to the articles and asked that staff automatically send out a thank you letter to people who commented. In response to one such letter, Brown insisted they do replenish the bag supply daily. Chair Arnst suggested placing a second can and dispenser on the LRT. 6. REVIEW "TO DO" ITEMS FROM PARK TOURS OF JUNE 12,2001 A. . . . . . . . . . . . . B. . . . . C. . . Skate Park Investigate trash pick up on weekends Post stop sign at exit Investigate no parking signs on either/both side of street & Overflow sign Rules of the park sign to be posted Using the newsletter, invite kids to participate in a youth committee for the Skate park to create rule and promote communication with the City Request MnDOT to install a better barrier to H wy 7 Consider Frisbee Golf or Horseshoe courts Post a No Stopping, Standing, Parking sign on Hwy 7 Chair Arnst will contact Deephaven regarding Bike Rack Consider plantings of trees/grasses for the berm Check on a cost estimate or quote for punching a well or obtaining a drinking fountain Manor Park Clean-up graffiti on the walls and ceiling of the picnic shelter Check on lighting issues with the neighbors Observed East Tonka Little League using the fields, they admitted to frequent use, check on user fee status Lower the signage at the tennis courts Silverwood Park Fertilize the lawn Need hours of operation signage posted at all the parks PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 Page 4 of 7 D. Crescent Beach · Check the possibility of Park signage E. Badger Park · Lower the sign on the tennis courts · Rink lights are a concern, check on the possibility of obtaining the salvaged lights from Frontier Electric · Need to street sweep the parking lot after the frequent rains · Investigate user fees for football · Potential horseshoe pit · Start a dialogue with the South Shore Senior Center to partner on gardening or gazebo project for the park · Look into archery bales for the park . * All Parks Need Hours of Operation Signage Clearly Posted 7. SCHEDULE GRAND OPENING DATES FOR EDDY STATION AND SKATE PARK A. Skate Park Chair Arnst distributed a Skate Park Grand Opening draft proposal for comment. She pointed out that the shuttle service was necessary due to the parking and traffic issues at the Skate Park. Upon Administrator Dawson's suggestion, Arnst proposed two separate Grand Openings for the two parks. Chair Arnst asked for feedback and a timeline for the proposal. Everyone liked the draft proposal and preferred a weekend date in mid July contingent on the schedules of both Tim Hughes and Matt Pike. Brown suggested the kids would really enjoy a rally and demonstration put on by Tim Hughes ~nd his skate park friends. Young agreed, adding it would be nice to see the skate boarding cops, we heard word of during . the park tours this evening, putting on a display and a presence. Chair Arnst stated she would work with the Mayor, Craig Dawson, and staff to put this together B. Eddy Station Chair Arnst shared. Administrator Dawson's idea of holding an Ice Cream Social for the Eddy Station Grand Opening and asked for Commission feedback. Everyone liked the idea of having Council and Commissioners serving ice cream and mingling with the public. Many Commissioners agreed that the event would need to take place while the park is still active with sports organizations and will shoot for mid August tournament time. Chair Arnst asked whether the Park Foundation might like to offer their Adopt-A-Brick fundraiser during the event. Bix voiced her concern of organizing the fundraiser in time to roll it out at the grand opening but offered to present the idea to the Park Foundation next week at their regular meeting. In order to pull it off PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 Page 5 of 7 professionally, Bix wondered whether it could be done so quickly, but said she would do her best to move it forward. Puzak maintained that the event could not be delayed any later in the season or no one would be there. All agreed that the time to strike, be it the fundraiser or grand opening, is when the most people are there. With tournament time in mid August, the Commission could tie it into the Grand Finale of the season. Chair Arnst asked to have these items slated as tentative items for the City Council to approve at their next meeting. Once the dates are verified with the Park Foundation and park use schedules. Dallman wondered if fundraising at these events would send a message that the City is broke. Puzak disagreed, saying simply that it implies that the Community Parks need Community support. . Zerby wondered if ties could be made to either event, especially Eddy Station, from a historical or heritage angle. Puzak noted that this could be the First of an Annual Ice Cream Social Event at Eddy Station. Everyone applauded the idea and agreed that the next years could be done earlier in the season. Meyer moved, Bix seconded, approving that the Park Commission supports the Park Foundation fundraising Project of the Buy-A-Brick program. Motion passed 6/0: 8. DISCUSSION OF NON-PAYMENT O~ USER FEES FROM SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS Chair Arnst circulated the 2001 Field Use charts and Sports Organization User Fee Agreement record. As demonstrated by the User Fee Record form, there has been hesitation in receiving payment from several groups. Since the beginning of the season, one month ago, letters and invoices have been sent to these organizations instructing them to pay. . Chair Arnst voiced the concern expressed by the Mayor and City Council over the non-payments and how the Commission will follow-up with these organizations. After attending the quarterly meeting between the Mayors and Minnetonka Community Education, Brown felt he heard many communities expressing the same concerns Shorewood has already voiced to Dan Cuzlik, the Administrator for MCES. The same concerns Brown heard included the scheduling questions, field usage, and how fees get collected and rosters obtained, they've presented. Since that meeting, Brown reported that Administrator Dawson and himself have met with Cuzlik to address these ongoing issues and plan to do so agam. Brown indicated at this meeting with Cuzlik, he and Dawson asked that if the various Cities were willing to spend more and pay for better service could these areas be addressed better. Brown believed MCES is feeling the heat from Shorewood and others. He maintained that MCES should see that the Cities are willing to pay for good service, and in order for them to compete and continue to be the supplier they need to improve. Puzak asked what the City pays MCES and what it covers. Brown replied that the City pays approximately .50 per capita, totaling about $3,200. These fees cover the scheduling of fields and administration of lifeguard and tennis services. Puzak then questioned whether they are capable of supplying us with what we are demanding, or if it would be wise to enter into a shared park and recreation services of our own. The City had PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 Page 6 of 7 offered last year to purchase new scheduling software for MCES. Chair Arnst voiced her concern that MCES needs to be more fOlthcoming with the City and Park Commission. This was the first year Shorewood required sports organization user fees, and while we asked for support and cooperation from MCES, we did not get answers or the cooperation we needed. Chair Arnst asked for feedback regarding their no pay, no play stance as it regards to sports organizations anteing up the required user fees. For example, East Tonka Little League at Manor Park this evening has not paid and was discovered playing there. Brown, pointing to the User Fee Records, showed that staff has repeatedly tried to reach East Tonka Little League. They've spoken to members of ETLL and put them on notice of the user fees. According to contacts made in both May and June they are now aware and should know they owe for the use of those fields, especially after found cunningly using Manor this evening. Bix agreed that it is apparent that East Tonka Little League is using the fields and we need to bill them accordingly. If they choose to, they can come back and argue their case in front of the Commission at that time if they disagree. Young suggested attaching a copy of the MCES's own scheduling document to the invoice showing where and when they use Manor Park fields. . Brown noted that the City is only beginning to see funds coming in with the new user fees. He admitted there will always be a few bumps in the road when initiating a new system, but he maintained that he has seen progress as well. With that, they will still be receiving rosters yet this fall and have exceeded the budgeted amount they expected already. Chair Arnst indicated that it seems to her that there is a process in place, the invoices and letters have been sent out asking for payment and she requested to be sure ETLL was added to that list. 9. APPROVAL SUPPORTING THE PARK FOUNDATION FUNDRAISING PROJECT OF A BRICK PROGRAM Addressed under Eddy Station Grand Opening. 10. OLD BUSINESS . Regarding operations at Eddy Station, Brown asked the Commission to clarify their perceptions and expectations over buildings hours. Meyer believed it should be open during park hours. Dallman agreed, that the public will expect it to be open 7 A.M to 10 P.M., especially after the City spent that money to build it. Bix questioned whether winter hours could be different, with a rink attendant present, than summer hours. Brown reported that the Mayor would like to look into a video camera surveillance system. Dallman added that an automatic timer on the outdoor bathrooms might be useful. Brown said that he will pursue different avenues and obtain quotes from services that can provide the operations we need at Eddy Station. Puzak asked when the City takes ownership of the property. Brown reported that the final building inspection should take place within a couple of weeks. Chair Arnst wondered if a wooden sign could be installed on the LRT pointing people to the Eddy Station vending machines. Brown would follow-up. . . PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 12,2001 Page 7 of 7 11. NEW BUSINESS Puzak scheduled the annual Park Commission picnic on Big Island for August 21,2001, at 6 P.M. We will meet at the Excelsior Public Docks and guests should bring a dish to share and meat to grill. 12. ADJOURNMENT Meyer moved, Biz seconded, adjourning the regular Park Commission Meeting of June 12,2001, at 10:02 P.M. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson RECORDING SECRETARY " CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~ 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOQ), MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewoo~.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council :/ Larry Brown, Director of Public Works IW ~ June 21,2001 FROM: DATE: . RE: A Motion Naming the "Old Rest Area" Located at 5355 St. Albans Bay Road On May 8, 2001 the Park Commission considered options for:the naming of the latest addition to park land located at 5355 St. Albans Bay Road (refer to Attachment 1 for the site location map). This parcel is currently comprised of green space and the site of'the new skate park. . In the decision to name the park, Commissioners stated the need to provide a name, which reflected the support and commitment provided by all of the "Lake Area" communities to make this a successful project. Therefore, a motion was made a passed ~ecommending that the name for the park be the South Shore Community Park. A resolution, which designates the name for the park as the South Shore Community Park, IS attached for the City Council's consideration. ft t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER #5 B >jJDd s .uoql UO!"'D~01 a...!s @+ 5'0 I sal!W ~ ~ =t ~ f') ::::- == - ~ :::: - 100". ~,,;;: I . "J I ,0 "" "I '--0\. . ~~Ji(~~ ? f# (: ~~" t~ ll~~ a~.~l ^.~ ~"II ) ~i<~Jl\H ~~ " """',," r..,} ~ li~' 'J ,~~ ~ . . '. .,)~~;/ ~ ~\ \_____ ~OOM8JOllS #- /2w~ ,D~~~ ~~). ~ J't~,^1 \/ ~~~~~ ~~,,~/1 //n ).Y: ~%JLll'fl ~'I 1\ 0L ~ , b}~ ~ ~ &os.\\\n'ID\ Jf--117'Ht _l--;; i5-1 ~~ F'll~l~~ .~~ ~~ 'vrn SIa~/A 1111 d rEl! ~ -:ill rr V' .~H~~ ~"~~ a ~~. :'Kf~'.~ I~,/;;fl V ~ '=' $ ;1 .' I XI1 \ ~ 5 ~~ 1 t<{' t ~..:::~ti(<21rs i . . . 1/ / I"t'l >t" ~L.. - Ldir"'~ ,~/" ~ " ~ I!&l .~ fC:;~rn~~'~Z'\\ ~ i~tjue~r ~:~" ~ .V.S",mV1S ~ ~ -@-r ~ 1[1 ~'I .~ r~~ r- ~ ~~ "'\\ ~ '" I I .. "'"': ","'i'lll . . ~ YV".!...r-' '>... f$f ~ ~ ffi ok{!{! . :f' i;r? /jJ.,,,,~ \c--'~,%:~,*, ~ M'll '1- ~ r- Co:;.' .1c-'<:1_%"" \ / ~~) I''i-\\ aOOMN33"'''OA.ll~ \~'w(,f ~ ~ ~ CI~/ ~t\K >,;-+;-} ~~ ~""y~ ~~ ~ /1 \'<~ ~61lTf~ '0~o' -\~~ hi ~ II ~~[rVIJJJW~ ~ (1f\ --trH-,~>-~ = i //1 '\(1.\~' ~ v.~ ~ fV>~ ~ '<.: ~ I \'- T - .1~ m ? 1- ..(:-- l-W) ~ ~ I I ~ / 1-1 ~~~~~. , R r - ~ 'I T T O~~n~~ ,uJJi~91~'cY~~ ~ I I- j ~~~L~~B~~nr~IIl1AY 1 Jl11rol:D ~/ /Qr~~ -'" 7' - l= .(l vJ # fr (/ 8l~ rnl3 NOS ~ MY \\ -, ~ ;= ~ / -,.- //" ~ -..~ / a 8 !!I Vl<G- ~\\. ~ ~ I ~ Jr e h~Y ~ -z;.~ ~I r- // 4-. 7. <0 1)0;; "y g.~ ~<z:fu\ ,-\y ~;TI tj~ I o N 'J '1 PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2001 Page 5of6 C. Discuss City Vending Operations as They Currently Interact with Sports Organization Vendors Dallman inquired whether the contract would allow the City to run concessions at Eddy Station next year if a vendor is found. Brown noted that there is no conflict between Midwest Vending and a Concession stand, however, the City will not be allowed to operate other vending on the premises. D. Review Current Vendor Permit Ordinance (Att.-#8D) Chair Arnst pointed out that during tournament weekends, many vendors are at Freeman Park selling things, but until now have not been required to have vendor permits as required by the ordinance. These vendors will now need to be notified that they will be required to pay the annual $50 permit fee. C. Recommendation to Council . Dallman moved, Berndt seconded, to recommend to Council they approve the proposal presented by Midwest Vending to install vending machines at Eddy Station. Motion passed 5/0. 9. NAME IDEAS FOR SKATE PARK A. Review and Discuss Name Ideas (Att.-#9A) Chair Arnst added another name for consideration. "The Passing" was offered by Tim Hughes. Dallman then presented a letter from the Clarence Clofer American Legion Post and Unit No. 259 offering to provide Shorewood with a cash donation of $1,000 a year for the next five years for improvements within the park area, provided that post 259 is allowed to visually identify itself on the premises as a sponsor of the park. He added that they also ask the park be named to reflect its muti-purpose communal use andnot only as a skate park. Berndt commented that she liked the opportunity to show the community that the American Legion is a part of the Community on many levels. . . Chair Arnst asked for comment whether the Commission liked the name South Shore Community Park as a whole. '. B. Recommendation to City Council Young moved, Meyer seconded, to recommend to Council that the name South Shore Community Park be adopted for the overall park. Motion passed 5/0. Young moved, Berndt seconded, to recommend to Council we accept the offer as laid out in the letter from the Clarence Clofer American Legion Post and Unit No. 259 to sponsor the South Shore Community Park. Motion passed 5/0. Chair Arnst requested staff send a response letter to the Post's offer. The meeting recessed from 9: 13 to 9: 15 P.M. to give Chair Arnst an opportunity to call to obtain the additional name submitted by Commissioner Bix. Chair Arnst returned to add the name "Easy Rider" to the name idea list. She asked to vote on the list of given names. During the process the onry name to receive one vote from Commissioner Berndt was "Rails". ATTACHMENT 2 PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2001 Pa~e 6of6 More.discussion continued with Commissioner Young questioning why a second and separate name for the Skate Park was necessary. Many agreed that the overall park name fit well and asked if the second sign on . premises could merely acknowledge the contributors to the park. Brown felt this approach to be consistent with the other Shorewood Parks whose signage also thanks contributors. Dallman moved, Young seconded, recommending Council not give a separate name to the Skate Park at the new South Shore Community Park but instead acknowledge contributors of the overall park. Motion passed 5/0. 10. OLD BUSINESS There was none. 11. NEW BUSINESS There was none. It was noted that the meeting on the 22nd will begin with a park tour of Manor, Silverwood, Badger, Skate Park and Crescent. . 12. ADJOURNMENT Berndt moved, Meyer seconded to adjourn. Motion passed 5/0. The meeting adjourned at 9:23 P.M. .RESPECTFULLYSUBMITTED, Kristi B. Anderson RECORDING SECRETARY . TO: Park Commission. FROM: Pat Arnst RE: ,Skate Park Naming DATE: April 26, 2001 Following is a summary of our discussions of April 25, concerning the Skate Park Naming. At our May 8 meeting, we will need to formally discuss these ideas, agree on name(s) and make a recommendation to the Council. . The meeting was attended by the Shorewood Park Commission. Commissioner Puzak was absent. Also in attendance was Deephaven City'Councilmember and Park Liaison Nancy Middleton, Deephaven Park Commissioner Jennifer Young and Larry Brown. Excelsior Park Commissioners could not attend, but did submit four name ideas for the Skate Park. . The group agreed that the 6.0 acre park facility should be treated as two components. The skate park being one, and the remainder of the park the other. We agreed that the skate park should have a name that is quick, easy, and most importantly, youth oriented. The overall park name should be reflective of the community as a whole. Name ideas for the skate park: . . Skateboard 7 Pike's Park Skater Supreme Skater Heaven Lake Skate 5-Citles Skate Park Twister . Grinders Rails . . . . . . . . After some discussion, the finalists were: (1) Skateboard 7, (2) Lake Skate, (3) Grinders and (4) Rails. While the group agreed that Pike's Park would pe a fine tribute to the young man who initiated the idea, there was concern about the other kids that had participated and the equity of naming the park after just one activist. The group did agree that contact should be made with some of the young people who have worked with the cities to solicit name ideas from them. Those names will be included with the four listed above, for consideration by the Shorewood Park Commission. The skate park itself could be recognized by a plaque that read approximately: Rails a community project supported by the cities of Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay Contributors: . Susie Smith Mary Moe Billy Bean, etc. Next, in naming the general park area, the group concluded that "South Shore Community Park" . was in context with the other joint ventures of the south shore cities, i.e., the police department, Southshore Center and the new fire district. A second option discussed, but not as strongly supported, was "South Lake Community Park." Commi~sioner Dallman proposed that the American Legion would be interested in an annual sponsorship of the park if the name somehow included "American Legion." A proposal was made that the name, as displayed on the sign, could be something to the effect of: . South Shore Community Park maintained with the genel'ous contributions of American Legion Post # The group agreed that the inclusion of the veteran's group was a worthwhile idea, and that the contributions would be welcomed. They further agreed that this type of sign would preclude any confusion about ownership of the park and would leave the door open for other potential sponsors. Dallman said that so far, the idea had only been discussed between him and the Post Commander. He agreed to take the proposal back for discussion by their full board and would report back to the Park Commission. . Other discussion: Council member Middleton and Commissioner Young were very interested in the user fees process and ordinance recently enacted by Shorewood. They requested copies of our information for discussion within their own city. We also exchanged information about dog issues, vandalism and sports organization requests, format for our park commission meetings and minute taking. Both were very pleased with the opportunity to dialog and asked that we continue to host these informal meetings on a regular basis. To: . Park Commission From: Twila Grout . Date: May 3, 2001 Re: Skate P~rk Naming . I talked to Tim Hughes and he and about 15 other kids voted that the name should be "The Passing", He explained their reason is that the skate park is next to Highway 7 and as you are driving by you say "hey there's a skate park" and pass right by since there is no where to turn until you are pass the park, . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128 · www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us May 17,2001 Charles Vinge, Commander Clarence Clofer American Legion Post 259 24450 Smithtown Road Shorewood, Miimesota 55331 Dear Commander Vinge: . The City of Shorewood thanks Clarence Clofer American LegionPost 259 for its offer of a five-year commitment of funds for improvements to South Shore Community Park. It is gratifying to see organizations such as Post 259 willing to make this type of investment for the community. The Park Commission is in the process of reviewing the master plans of each of Shorewood' sparks. In the case of South Shore Community Park, a master plan will need to be developed. The City will be very pleased to accept designated contributions that are consistent with the South Shore Community Park master plan. The City will take ownership of contributions that are non-cash items. In concept, the City Council and Park Commission agree that Post 259 should have some readily visible and identifiable recognition for its role in the improvement of South Shore Community Park. The Post will need to work with the Park Commission to identify recognition is appropriate, and the City Council will approve it. City staff is ready to assist as necessary throughout this process. . At this point the Park Commission has recommended, and the City Council has indicated its concurrence, that the skate facility in South Shore Community Park will not have a separate name. Again, we thank you for your offer of partnership in the development of Shorewood' s newest park. C: Pat Arnst, Park Commission Chair Larry Brown, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mayor and City Council #'It '-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Attachment 3 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION NAMING THE SOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY PARK WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is the fee title owner of property located at 5355 St. Alban's Bay Road to been designated by the City of Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan as a City Park; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood Park Commission has solicited names for said Park from representatives of supporting Cities and the City of Shorewood; and WHEREAS, the Park Commission recommends that the new park be named "South Shore Community Park"; . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that the property owned by the City located at 5355 St. Albans Bay Road be hereinafter designated as the "South Shore Community Park." ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of June, 2001. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: . CRAIG W. DAWSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2001 SOUTHSHORE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER 5735 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Present: Chair Bailey; Commissioners Borkon, Gagne, Packard, Pisula, White, and Woodruff; Council Liaison Lizee; Engineer Brown; and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: None . APPROVAL OF MINUTES . May 15, 2001 Gagne moved, Borkon seconded, approving the May 15, 2001, Planning Commission Minutes as presented. Motion passed 7/0. 1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CUB FOOD STORE - COMP PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONINGIPRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMITSN ARIANCE Applicant: Shorewood Village Shopping Center, Inc. Location: 23680 Highway 7 . Chair Bailey explained the procedures to be utilized in this Public Hearing. He noted the Planning Commission was a recommending body only that prided itself on being impartial when considering issues such as this one. He reviewed the goal of the Public Hearing and noted the Commission was interested in hearing ideas without debate. He requested testimony be directed to the Commission and that courtesy, respect, and brevity prevail. This matter would be reported on at the June 11,2001, Regular City Council Meeting*** He also explained one Councilmember had recused himself in dealing with this matter, thus approval by Council required a unanimous vote of support. Director Nielsen then presented background information regarding this matter. The Avalon Group, LLC, represented Mr. Stan Taube, owner of the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, Inc., had submitted plans for redevelopment of the Shorewood Village Shopping Center at 23680 State Highway 7. They proposed to demolish part of the existing Driskill's grocery store and then build a new CUB Foods store extending from the west end of the shopping center onto three parcels of land to the west. The shopping Senter existed on the largest parcel (8.32 acres) in that immediate area and was zoned General Commercial. A vacant parcel to the west was zoned similarly, except for a IOO-foot wide strip of land on the north side of the previously vacated Maple Street right-of-way, which was zoned Single Family Residential and contained 3.52 acres. The site currently occupied by the bank contained .24 acres, and was also zoned General Commercial. The bank building would be demolished as part of this proposal. The fourth parcel was occupied by a single-family residence, zoned Single Family Residential, and contained .72 acres of land. Applicants proposed demolishing the existing house and requested a Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 2 of 12 rezoning of both of the residentially zoned properties to General Commercial. The applicants also proposed combining all four parcels for a total of 12.8 acres. Zoning and land use surrounding the site was varied. The land to the nOlth and east surrounding the property was zoned Single Family Residential. A commercially zoned shopping center existed in Chanhassan immediately to the south across Highway 7. A single family home, a two-family home, and two offices, zoned respectively residential and commercial, existed to the west. Much of the site currently holding the shopping center existed as a gravel mine years ago. A substantial buffer of vegetation exists along the north side of the property. The new store, loading and parking areas would be extended onto the residentially zoned land. The new building would add 67,188 square feet to the shopping center resulting in a total of 109,087 square feet. This application was quite complex and involved consideration of numerous zoning actions by the City: · Comprehensive Plan Amendment to expand the commercial area into what is now guided as Low-to-Medium Residential (2-3 units per acre) · Rezoning of residential land from R-IC, Single Family Residential to C-3, General Commercial · Preliminary plat approval combining four parcels · Vacation of a portion of Maple Street right-of-way · Conditional use permit for drive-up facility (pharmacy) · Variance to hardcover requirement in Shore land District · Conditional use-Shoreland Impact Plan · Variance to parking requirements (number of spaces) · Variance to parking requirements (setbacks) · Conditional use permit (revision to multiple signage permit) . These actions were detailed in order throughout the remainder of Director Nielsen's presentation of issues and analysis. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning requests required evaluation by the Planning Commission of the land use, transportation, and natural resource policies as they pertained to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plans. Approval of a preliminary and ultimately final plat would require the four parcels be legally combined. . As part of this request, a small triangle of Maple Street would need to be vacated. Consideration was to be given to the space available for a turn-around at the end of the street. Director Nielsen listed possible options for consideration. He noted the design chosen would be subject to review by the Fire Marshal. In considering the remainder of the applicant's requests, Director Nielsen encouraged the Planning Commission to make sure all criteria for granting conditional use permits and variances were met. Criteria for granting conditional use permits included consideration of the relationship or consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, compatibility with future and existing uses, possible depreciation of the area where the request was located, acceptability of the accommodations with existing City services, and at the same time, not overburdening those services, as well as the specific conditions listed for each use. Criteria for granting variances were more specific, notably that the circumstances must be unique to the property, the applicant must demonstrate "undue hardship," economic conditions alone shall not constitute hardship, the burden of proof was on the applicant, and the City may attach reasonable conditions. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 3 of 12 Director Nielsen then explained the eleven conditions relative to the drive-in facilities requested as part of this proposal. Concerns were expressed regarding the architectural compatibility with the existing center. Light standards seemingly appeared to be located within landscape islands or area. In addition, the developer proposed a six-foot fence sitting atop a masonry retaining wall of varying heights, along the west side of the property. While the current vegetation has developed into a significant buffer to the commercial property, some concern was expressed that the developer proposed a single row of spruce and aspen trees between the wall and the property line. Director Nielsen explained aspens would require a number of years before their height would become an effective screening device. The City placed considerable reliance upon landscaping to achieve compatibility between land uses, and as such, this plan was not considered ample. Director Nielsen noted this landscaping issue was a concern for all areas on site . Another area of concern included the circulation pattern for the drive-in facility. It included a one-way circulation pattern. While there was apparently sufficient room for a car using the drive-in window to make a necessary u-turn as it approached from the south, it was forced into the lane for exiting delivery trucks and employees parking at the rear of the center. Lighting fixtures required a more detailed plan demonstrating how the light source would not be visible to adjoining properties. Drainage was of concern as well. The proposed plan relied on a low impact development technique known as infiltration. Since little information was made available regarding the soil on site, this was questionable. Also, the plan proposed a fenced-in sunken pond on the northwest corner of the site. In consideration of the high retaining walls also proposed for that area, safety and maintenance of the area were cause for concern as well. Significant signage plans had not been submitted, however, it was recommended no signage be allowed on the west side facing the residential areas. All parking and circulation areas were to be paved, and proposed curbing around all parking and perimeter areas were consistent with the City zoning code requirements. . The applicant's plan indicated approximately two-thirds of the site would be situated within the 1000-foot Shoreland zoning district for Lake Linden. As such, the site would be subject to the maximum of 25 percent impervious surface requirements. The proposed hardcover for this plan was in excess of 80 percent. Also, variance requirements set forth by City code for the Shoreland district also reference the " . . . preservation of the natural land forms, vegetation, and the marshes and wetlands within the City of Shorewood." While there was no direct impact to any adjoining wetland the extent of the tree removal and the extent of the site alteration being proposed appeared to be in conflict with this code. Similarly, these concerns were echoed regarding the necessary submission of a Shoreland impact plan. A number of issues surfaced regarding the request for a parking variance. Initially, there appeared to be a parking shortage on site as part of the proposed plan. After several revisions and varying calculations required for parking space width, it was determined the plan was short 29 spaces. The applicant had shown a number of parking spaces to the rear of the building causing concern for the security and practicality of those proposed spaces. "Cart corrals" were proposed as part of the parking lot islands. This conflicted with the landscape plan and possibly the infiltration islands. Also, many time these "cart corrals" ended up in the parking lots further reducing the number of spaces for parking. Finally, there was no room for snow storage, requiring operational compliance in having the snow transported offsite. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 4 of 12 In addition, the proposed plan included 25 feet of pavement encroachment behind the new store, and ultimately, a hardship had not been demonstrated in this request for a parking variance in the setback area. Director Nielsen reported one of the most significant issues expressed by City staff was increased traffic on Lake Linden Drive, Yellowstone Trail, and Country Club Road. A traffic study conducted by the. applicant's traffic engineer suggested the traffic generated by a CUB store would not be significant. This seemed to require revision to show more realistic comparisons as well as inclusion of the increase of traffic related to weekend use. Engineer Brown briefly summarized his report on this matter providing more significant detail in regard to each of the requests by the applicant. Specifically, he reviewed the site plan and traffic circulation patterns; a response to a traffic study provided by Benshoof & Associates; comments regarding stonnwater management plans as well as proposed sanitary sewer and watermain issues; parking requirements; landscaping and lighting; and general plat comments. This report was submitted as a memorandum from Dave Hutton, ofWSB & Associates, dated May 18,2001, and would be made available to the public for further review at City Hall. This report also included specific conditions and recommendations regarding the approval of this matter. Engineer Brown also reported on the impact the Highway 7 and 41 Reconstruction project would have on this project. Notably, the access to Lake Linden Drive from Highway 7 would be closed, signals would be replaced in this area, and there was concern for the stormwater pond in front of the SuperAmerica located on the southwest corner of the intersection. Retention levels for the pond were already being utilized to full capacity as part of proposed plans for that area and would not be able to withstand additional drainage as a result of the CUB project. . Chair Bailey complimented City staff on the thoroughness of their reports and thanked them for their efforts regarding this request. Barbara Van Auken, of the Avalon Group and representing Mr. Stan Taube-owner of the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, addressed the Commission. She explained there had been significant upgrading and remodeling completed on site. Further, she noted the Supervalu store was the anchor tenant, owned. by Mr. Scott Driskill. That store would be replaced with the proposed expansion and upgrade of grocery store use. She stated the bank on site was owned by Mr. Taube and leased to the current bank occupant. . She believed the best use of the site included the proposed expansion and upgrade of the grocery store. She reviewed past historic meeting information regarding the proposal, noting the meeting of May I, 2001,where in an effort to work with City staff, the Avalon Group had consistently responded to requests made by the City throughout the planning process. She stated this would continue throughout the remainder of the process as well. She further explained a neighborhood meeting had taken place on May 18,2001, at City Hall with twenty-nine citizens in attendance. At a most recent follow-up session on June 4,2001, seven citizens were present to hear additional studies, answers to previous questions, and other concerns. She then introduced the remaining members representing the Avalon Group this evening. Mr. John Parson, of the Parsons Transportation Group, and a civil engineer of twenty years, made presentation to the Commission regarding the proposed fire flow storage tank on site, fencing, entrance drive, alternate site plan, landscaping plan, site grading plan, lighting plan, sightline study, and potential water usage for this proposal. He stated there would be a fire flow storage tank on site as part of this proposal. Also, the fence proposed around the infiltration pond met National Urban Retention Pond (NURP) standards and a safety ladder would be installed as well. With regard to the entrance to the Shopping Center, he preferred the proposed Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 5 of 12 entrance rather than the one MnDOT was supporting as part of their reconstruction plans. He noted the alternate site plan of one restaurant and convenience store could adequately be situated on the site. He proposed "shoebox" style lighting with flat lens. He further explained the grading plans for the area. The property was believed to have been a gravel operation previously, however, all soil tests completed thus far had missed evidence of that form of operation. The sand and gravel hoped for as an aid to the infiltration process for the NURP pond area had not materialized. As a result, consideration was being given to running piping to other gravel areas on site. He also noted this proposal was subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District standards and resolution to issues was forthcoming. The photometrics of the proposed plan were being reviewed to address additional "hotspot" areas recognized by the topography. A sight line study had been conducted for the proposal. Sight lines had been examined from a second story height. Findings concluded the use of a six-foot fence would filter the headlights from a delivery truck, but would not shelter the truck entirely from view. . With respect to use of semi-trucks on site, a standard semi could access all proposed turns in the circulation pattern, however, it would need to encroach onto land and turn lanes with the proposed entrance suggested by MnDOT. Also, it would encroach onto parking spots to access the drive-through lane of the pharmacy, but good sight lines were maintained in the pharmacy area. Water usage noted there would be use of a well for the site. He noted filling the water tank would potentially cause the water table to dip around that well. While he had not been able to identify the neighboring wells in the area, he expected the amount of impact to the water table in the area to be insignificant. Mr. Bob Knudson, representing Supervalu, presented a review of the Architectural Plan. He state CUB was experiencing new growth throughout the Metro area, and as such, different store designs were planned. The proposed store for this site was smaller than many of their typical stores and a new layout was being proposed at the corporate level. He anticipated a prototype would be finished within the next month. . Ms. Mary McGlinch, member of the Real Estate department of Supervalu, Inc., introduced Mr. Curt Craig, District Manager for CUB Foods. Mr. Craig briefly reviewed the proposed interior layout of the store, noting it would be most similar to the South dale store. Ms. McGlinch stated the proposed store would be operational twenty-four hours a day, with fairly consistent daytime hours for the pharmacy, and ten different departments within the store itself. Security was not an issue at other stores, she explained, due to the use of the store and lighting on the site. She then reviewed truck delivery times, explaining the store would attempt to restrict deliveries during the nighttime hours. She anticipated a number of deliveries throughout the week by semi and approximately ten panel trucks daily to properly stock the store. In addition, she explained the current Driskill's employees would be allowed to interview with CUB for continued employment. The bank building on site would be demolished and negotiations were underway regarding use of the store space for banking. Mr. Jim Benshoof, a traffic engineer, briefly summarized a traffic report generated by his firm, Benshoof and Associates. His findings indicated there would not be a perceptible change in the traffic on Lake Linden Drive, Yellowstone Trail, and Country Club Road. Overall, he found a seven to eleven percent increase in total daily volume on those roadways. He did not believe this level would alter the basic function and level of safety currently being experienced on that roadway as well. He further explained he had received a copy of staff memorandums and noted a general degree of skepticism and concern from City staff and citizen comments as various neighborhood meetings. As a result, he would seek to provide Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June S 2001 Page 6 of 12 fUlther response, specifically focusing developing alternate traffic scenarios and the effects of weekend traffic on specified roadways. Mr. Payton again addressed the Commission in direct response to Director Nielsen's memorandum to the Commission and City Council, dated May 31, 2001. He briefly explained a final plat would be forthcoming upon approval of this proposal. Work would continue regarding resolution of matters regarding the vacation of the Maple Street right-of-way. He questioned Whether demolishing the current drive through on the bank site; resulting in a singular drive-through would enhance the plan. Further, he stated, according to his calculations, existing hardcover utilized fifty-five percent of the site. He noted expectations for reductions in that hardcover amount could not possibly be met with an expansion. Any development in that area would have the potential to impact Lake Linden and all best efforts were being put forth to minimize that impact. He also explained short retaining walls would be erected on the north side of the proposed parking stalls behind the store in an effort to protect the steep slope of the topography. Chair Bailey then opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 9:30 P.M. Ms. Dione Kahlstrom, 6070 Lake Linden Drive, stated she was a spokesperson for approximately twelve people in her neighborhood. She stated her concerns regarding traffic on Lake Linden Drive, specifically taking issue with the potential for increased speed and number of cars traveling on the road to get to the proposed store. Also, she had taken photos of other metro area CUB food stores and was concerned about the tremendous amounts of trash along fencelines. In addition, she noted concern for the use of aspen trees as part of the proposed landscape plan. She eXplained these trees lose their leaves in winter and would drastically reduce the buffering intent of their purpose. She also submitted a petition including approximately 350 names asking that this proposal not be approved. She stated residents were concerned it would set a precedent for other large chains and these residents would like to maintain a rustic, small- town country charm currently being demonstrated in Shorewood. Mr. Austin Kraft, 6125 Rampart Court, stated he had met with other neighbors as a community. He explained it did not seem as though the CUB proposal fit within the community. He stated he believed there were issues related to traffic and the Comprehensive Plan. He explained the traffic on Lake Linden Drive would seem to increase substantially as a result of the new CUB Foods store. He further commented it seemed as though the proposed plan required huge exceptions to the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Theresa Elsbernd, 5880 Minnetonka Drive, stated she was a professional residential construction owner and had several questions and concerns regarding the proposal. She stated, as a residential builder, she was required to observe wetland and tree preservation measures, and believed the Avalon Group should have to comply with these requirements as well. She was concerned about the land preservation issues related to this proposal. Also, she expressed concern for the increase in traffic in the area, the change in historic, rustic character of the area, and she did not see any hardship being presented with regard to the requests for variances and permits. She stated she adamantly opposed the CUB proposal. Ms. Denise Koehnen, 6095 Lake Linden Drive, stated she lived directly west of the vacant lot beside Driskill's. She stated she was concerned about the buffer being planned for the site, noting it seemed inadequate. Litter posed another concern, as her property would most likely be affected. Lake Linden Drive was not adequately handling today's traffic let alone an increase, she stated. Mr. Roger Nestande, 6085 Lake Linden Drive, submitted photos to the Commission regarding the holding pond in his backyard as part of his property on the vacated land on Maple Street. Mr. Mike Adams, 24234 Mary Lake Trail, stated his concern regarding the traffic on Lake Linden Drive, Yellowstone Trail, and Country Club Road. He expressed concern for the speeding occurring in the area, . . Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 7 of 12 noting it was not unusual to see vehicles moving at sixty to seventy miles per hour on this road. Thus, making them impossible for pedestrian traffic. In addition, he stated the traffic from the CUB would compound this situation. He noted Shorewood had strict policies governing the use of conditional use permits and easements, and he hoped that applied to corporate entities as well. Mr. Kevin Byrne, 6085 Rampart Court, stated he had moved from the New England area to Shorewood because his family liked the similar character. He stated he liked being able to shop at a family-owned business because he believed it helped to establish pride in the community. He further stated he shopped at CUB and Driskill's and he understood the motive of a large warehouse style grocery store in producing efficiently by selling in large quantities. He implored the Commission to think about how the proposal would affect other businesses in the area. He noted it did not seem like a good fit. Other proposals would work to make themselves fit into the community and he believed CUB was choosing not to fit into the community, thus, he was opposed to the CUB proposal as well. . Mr. Duncan Storley, 5375 Eureka Road, stated he did not see any justification to wan'ant any changes in the rules to accommodate this proposal. The project seemed totally out of scale and well beyond need. He believed this proposal pushed every edge to get the biggest possible store for the site and the store itself was not need in the community. Mr. Chris Kahlstrom, 6070 Lake Linden Drive, stated any increase in traffic to Lake Linden Drive would be detrimental. Mr. Henry Miles, 24035 Mary Lake Trail, stated he had a hard time understanding the impact the store would make onthe area by looking at photos and listening to people. He believed shopping centers to be ugly, dirty, and noisy, as well as affecting the environment by contributing light pollution and noise pollution to the area. He stated he liked Shorewood's strategy of protecting the environment and built his own home according to these strategies. He requested the Planning Commission consider the motivations of the people doing their jobs and not be taken in by the process. He further requested the Commission ponder the future, and try to determine the impact this proposal would have on the area. . Ms. Britta Larson, owner of the Hair Razors ~alonat the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, stated she had owned the salon for five years and had concerns with the well portion of the proposal. Specifically, she was concerned with the impact the proposed well activity would have on the businesses in the center. Also, she expressed concern regarding the parking spaces allotted noting they did not seem at all adequate. Ms. Laurie Susla, 26077 Noble Road, stated she was concerned people were not aware of this issue. Mr. Todd Boynton, 6155 Riviera Lane, requested the Commission think about decisions made today affect the future. He asked the Commission to review criteria for variances and permits and be fair to all. Mr. Mark Kennedy, 23875 Yellowstone Trail, stated he had owned his property for thirty days. Had he known there would be a CUB Foods store increasing traffic in the area, he would not have purchased his residence. He stated his children were already fearful of walking along the street and he was not in favor of the proposal. Ms. Lorraine Johnson, 6060 Riviera Lane, stated she had lived in the area for thirty-two years. She stated her concern regarding Lake Linden Drive itself, noting it was a curvy, dangerous road. She enjoyed Driskill's and the "small town" appeal of the area and hoped it could remain. Mr. Stan Taube, 27280 Edgewood Road and owner/developer of the Shorewood Village Shopping Center, stated he had moved to the area for the same reasons stated by other people in the audience. He Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 8 of 12 stated he had always tried to maintain pride in his efforts to make a difference. He noted it had taken several years to improve the Shopping Center, and the Center could not exist without a supermarket. He thanked the Planning Staff for being cooperative in working on this proposal. He further stated he heard people with valid concerns and expected many of these same issues would arise with any other proposed store for that space. It was his belief that a supermarket in Shorewood would not be able to exist unless it was of similar size to the proposed store. He stated he was proud of what he had developed over the years, and respectfully committed to working with the City staff, residents, and developers for the area. Ms. Theresa Elsbernd, questioned the Commission about how best to present issues of concern to the Commission. Ms. Bonita Wylie, 5975 Charleston Circle, stated she understood the concerns presented this evening, as well as the need for people to continue to move further west of the Metro area to experience small town character. However, she also understood the need for commercial interests in the City. While this proposal was not perfect, she recommended the Commission at least give it ample consideration. Mr. Austin Kraft, reiterated his previous concern regarding the lack of "fit" within the community. He also stated most of the people he had talked with about the matter were opposed to it. . Mr. Bob Picha, 5930 Seamans Drive, expressed his concern for additional traffic in the immediate area of the Shopping Center. He suggested the CUB proposal be revised to include a smaller store, and the Commission consider the impact of this proposal on the road systems in the area. Mr. Ed Sheridan, 5160 Club Valley Road, stated he was an older resident of Shorewood. He had seen many residential areas become very commercial. He stated he liked the small stores and companies found in this area, rather than the bigger stores. He was opposed to the proposal as well. Chair Bailey closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 10:45 P.M. by thanking them for their participation in this matter. Chair Bailey recessed the meeting at 10:45 P.M., and reconvened the meeting at 10:55 P.M. Commissioner Pisula stated he had been directed to write down questions presented by the community . regarding this issue as part of this Public Hearing process. As such, he had generated a small list of questions, noting that most comments were heard this evening. However, he noted there still seemed to be questions regarding the traffic in the area of Lake Linden Drive. Engineer Brown responded the Planning Commission and City Council had tried to take several steps in the past in decreasing the amount of traffic on that road. He also cited the access closure to Highway 7 and the changes being proposed as part of the County Road 19 intersection project as efforts toward that end. He also commented the "cut-through"traffic would remain an issue as part of any proposed development for that area. He stated it was not an "if, but when" situation regarding the development of the site. The City could only help to guide and control any proposed development in that area. However, as it pertained to this request, it seemed as though traffic would certainly increase on Lake Linden Drive. Commissioner Pisula then noted skepticism had been raised regarding the traffic study completed by Benshoof and Associates. He questioned actual traffic increases and where would that traffic originate. Mary McGlinch responded the study was conducted utilizing information from a "dot map"developed at the Driskill's store, and she expected CUB would encourage traffic with origination of approximately five to eight miles away. . Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 9 of 12 Commissioner Pisula then noted questions remained about the water being supplied to the site. Engineer Brown explained accuracy of the aquifer could be checked using simple calculations. However, he deferred to Mr. Payton of the Avalon Group for information regarding water pressure. Mr. Payton responded the well would have continual maintenance and would be reviewed annually. There would be a two to three thousand gallon tank on top to push water out and provide pressure to the center. With regard to comments made by Ms. Britta Larsen about the water pressure in her salon, he noted there could possibly be internal pressure issues. He also suggested if a "draw down" was experienced, it may have been related to a more regional issue. Commissioner Pisula then questioned Mr. Payton about the preferred use of aspen trees on the site. Mr. Payton explained aspen trees were chosen as part of the proposal because they seemed to be similar to other tree types on residential propelties in the area. Other types could certainly be examined for adaptability and made part of the proposal. Commissioner Pisula suggested adequate parking requirements be worked out for the Hair Razors Salon by having Mr. Taube and the Avalon Group work directly with Ms. Larson. . Commissioner Pisula then questioned Director Nielsen about the notification standards used in this palticular proposal. Director Nielsen explained all applications require Public Hearings and notification of residents within three hundred fifty feet of proposed properties were required by state statute. However, Shorewood ordinance stipulated a five hundred foot notification radius would be utilized. This request required a more extensive notification area since the impact was greater than the required notification distance. As a result, extraordinary efforts were made in making notification to Shorewood residents. Hearings were posted in local newspapers as per the process, but also notifications were made in newsletters, City meeting minutes, additional mailings, and in some cases, hand deliveries were made in effort tQ notify residents. Chair Bailey then opened discussion including all Commission members as part of this process. Commissioners Borkon, Woodruff, and White questioned members of the Avalon Group about-refuse collection for the site. Various members of the Avalon Group explained refuse collection was contracted and refuse and recycling were keptin back of the store. . Commissioner Woodruff expressed concern regarding the inability of Supervalu to control delivery and refuse collection times. Commissioner Gagne noted he had personally observed the delivery of trucks and it had seemed excessive in the time span observed. He also expressed concern for the lack of. regulation regarding deliveries. Commissioner Borkon thanked members of the Avalon Group for their friendly presentation and questioned whether a smaller CUB format could be recommended for this site. Ms. McGlinch responded the CUB format was premised on efficiencies related to volume and product. She stated it would not work to utilize a smaller merchandising area. The sixty to seventy thousand foot stores allowed merchandise to be offered in a certain way, and she did not anticipate things working if made substantially smaller. Mr. Knudson interjected he would like to see an exterior that would fit in with the Center as a whole. Mr. Taube also interjected that aesthetically the team could design more pleasing architecture and landscape plans. Further, he knew there was additional work to be completed on this proposal and he would like to try to continue to work with City staff in an effort to make the proposal work with the community. Commissioner Packard questioned Engineer Brown whether changes could still be made to the proposed entrance design being suggested by MnDOT since the project would soon be out for bid. He responded it Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 10 of 12 would not be an option at this point in time. Ms. Van Auken of the Avalon Group stated the Group needed to meet to make revisions to their plans regarding the entrance. Commissioner Packard then asked what had been gained by reducing the parking stall widths. Mr. Knudson responded CUB could operate with a smaller stall width than cUlTently proposed if need be. Commissioner Borkon stated she had many concerns regarding how this proposal aligned with the Comprehensive Plan. Director Nielsen explained the number of requests issued as part of this proposal was not unusual for a commercial development. However, the proposal seemed contrary to the Comprehensive Plan in terms of compatibility with land use, noting the limited room made landscaping even more impOltant in establishing compatibility between high-density properties and others less dense. Chair Bailey then questioned Mr. Chuck Rickart, the City's traffic consultant, for his opinion regarding the traffic study presented by the Avalon Group. He noted skepticism regarding the study, noting conclusions regarding "cut-through" traffic and "pass-by trips"were not adequately explained or supported. Commissioner Borkon stated her concern for the lack of drainage from the proposed infiltration pond. . Engineer Brown explained he was always concerned about drainage ponds without a drainage outlet. He noted this raised many challenges for drainage as part of the proposal, and suggested the subject site plan determine a way for water to get from the pond to Lake Linden. Chair Bailey noted there seemed to be a number of issues regarding stormwater runoff from the site. Also, he commented he did not know that the "cart corrals" were required to be placed in the parking lot, but he suspected they would eventually be placed there utilizing more parking spaces in an already crowded situation. Mr. Knudson commented the "cart COlTals" would probably take up space in the lot. Pisula moved, Borkon seconded, directing Staff to prepare Findings of Fact that show: 1. The Avalon Group proposal conflicted with specific enumerated Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and so did not warrant adoption of either a Comprehensive Plan ~endment or rezoning. 2. That the proposal did not comply with the following relevant Policies s stated in the Comprehensive Plan: . A. Land Use General Policy #10 - "Intensification of land use..." B. Land Use General Policy #11- "Transitions between distinctly..." C. Land Use Residential Policy #2 - "Low density..." D. Land Use Residential Policy #3 - "Residential neighborhoods..." K Land Use Residential Policy #6 - "Residential development..." F. Land Use Residential Policy #1- "The City of Shorewood's..." G. Land Use Residential Policy #4 - "All existing and proposed..." H. Transportation Parking Policy #1- "No development..." 1. Housing Compatibility Policy #1- "Low density residential..." J. Housing Compatibility Policy #2 - "The character of ..." K. Housing Compatibility Policy #3 - "Residential developments..." Commissioner Pisula commented this project did not seem to fit the specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. He also commented he was pleased with the changes made at the Shopping Center over the past five years. In addition, he believed some other development would take place in the proposed area. Commissioners Borkon and Gagne agreed noting it was a shame the efforts of so many -.. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 11 of 12 would come to fruition. Also Commissioners Packard and Woodruff agreed there seemed a substantial amount of hurdles to surpass in order to make the proposal compatible with City requirements. Chair Bailey recommended working with City policies much more closely in the future. The Planning Commission again restated the motion for a vote. Motion passed 7/0. Woodruff moved, Gagne seconded, not approving the preliminary plat approval combining four parcels. Commissioner Woodruff stated to combine the four parcels would go against the premise of their previous vote. Motion passed 7/0. Gagne moved, Packard seconded, disallowing the vacation of the Maple Street right-of-way, due to failure to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion passed 7/0. . Woodruff moved, Borkon seconded, denying the request for a Conditional Use Permit for the drive-up facility as part of the pharmacy. Motion passed 7/0. Borkon moved, Pisula seconded, denying the request for Variance to the hardcover requirement in the Shoreland District. Motion passed 7/0. Borkon moved, Gagne seconded, denying the request for a Conditional Use Permit for the ShorelandImpact Plan. Motion passed 7/0. Packard moved, White seconded, denying the request for Variance to the parking requirements regarding the number of spaces. Motion passed 7/0. Pisula moved, Gagne seconded, denying the request for Variance to the parking requirements regarding the setbacks. Motion passed 7/0. . The Planning Commission noted the Conditional Use Permit for additional signage would not be needed at this time. Director Nielsen state the Findings of Fact would be a part of the Agenda for the July 3, 2001, Planning Commission Meeting, and would also appear on the July 9, 2001, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda if approved by the Commission. Commissioner Borkon commented she was impressed with the way the residents thought the City was on target regarding the Comprehensive Plan as it took such a long time to develop. Commissioner Woodruff agreed. 2. MA TTERS FROM THE FLOOR Mr. Duncan Storley, 5375 Eureka Road, questioned whether the Planning Commission, after having heard the concerns this evening for Lake Linden Drive, would be making any plans to tackle the issues related to the roadway. Engineer Brown commented he was excited to hear the residents were interested in change for the road, because in the past that had not been the case. He stated he would ask Staff to include it on the project list for the year. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 5 2001 Page 12 of 12 Ms. Bonita Wylie, 5975 Charleston Circle, questioned whether this matter had been published in any previous information formats for City residents. Director Nielsen explained there had been a number of steps taken above and beyond the norm in an effort to make citizens aware of this proposal. 3. DRAFT NEXT MEETING AGENDA As a Planning Commission Meeting Agenda had been previously drafted for June 6, 2001, there was not a need to draft an agenda. 4. REPORTS There were no further reports this evening. 5. ADJOURNMENT Woodruff moved, Pisula seconded, adjourning the Planning Commission Meeting of June 5, 2001, at 12:35 P.M. Motion passed 7/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary of - . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHC?REWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cl.shorewood,mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM DATE: Mayor and. City Council n~ Larry Brown, Director of Public worksf June 21,2001 TO: FROM: . RE: Report on Placement of Barricades on Reutiman !Lane Adjacent Freeman Park Field 3 In accordance with the direction provided at the last City Co~ncil meeting, Staff is continuing to research the impacts of placement of permanent barricades onl Reutiman Lane, adjacent Field 3 at Freeman Park. As part of the research, Staff has requested emergency service providers to provide input and feedback for any long-term solutions. As of the date of this report, that feedback has not been received. Therefore, this item has been rescheduled for the July 9th City Council meeting. . n: '-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ~#6 GA. . . i I i : I I CITY OF i SHOREWOOb I 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOP, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. wwW.cLshOrewoodi.mn.us. Cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us I MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: . RE: Update on the Shorewood Ponds Subdivision On June 11, 2001, the City Council conducted a hearing to. determine what items rem~ined in violation, and to determine what further action was necessary; and to insure that violations which were corrected wouid not reoccur. The following is an exceI]t from the Development Agreement outlining this process: I I Additional Remedies. Notwithstanding any other remedr available to the City under this Agreement, the City may elect to proceed under this paragraph to remedy a violation of I Developer's obligations under paragraph 26 hereof ' n: '-.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER #8B. (a) (b) (c) f Upon discovery of an apparent violation of the Plan or Policy, the City will notify the Developer in writing of the violation. The notice will contain a description of the circumstances constituting the violation, the provision of the Policy or Plan which is apparently violated, the steps which must be taken to correct the violation and the date by whic~ the compliance must occur. If compliance has not occurred within suqh time, or if the violation, by virtue of its repeated nature, seriousness or othdr factors are such that a penalty may be appropriate, the matter will be' schedul~d for a hearing by the City Council at a meeting not sooner than ten (10) day~ following the date on which written notice is mailed to the Developer. ! I ! Following'the hearing, the Council shall r~nder its decision in writing. If the Council determines that the Plan or Policy has been violated, (whether or not the violation has been corrected) it may take some or all of the following actions: . (i) impose a monetary penalty of not more than $1000 for each violation. (ii) order that the Developer stop work on all construction for which building permits have been issued; and withhold the issuance of additional building permits until it has received assurances satisfactory to the City that no future violations of the Plan or Policy are likely to occur. (iii) take any other actions or enforce any other remedies available to it under this Agreement, the Policy or the City Co~de. i i During that hearing, Mr. Gleason stated that the wet weat~er had prevented correction of the violations. The City Council passed a motion to provide an ad~itional 10 days, weather dependent, . to bring items into compliance. Staff is to report back at the Ju~e 25th City Council meeting as to the progress made for corrections. As of the date of the report, the Developer has made s1,lbstantial progress towards corrections of these violations: Silt fences have been properly anchored, the ditch between Shorewood Ponds and Freeman Park has been established, and the streets have been cleaned. Of the major items remaining are top-dressing and seeding of graded areas, and flushing of the storm sewer system. Considering that it has continued to rain over the past week, the progress to bringing the site into compliance has been significant. Mr. Gleason has requested that he be heard before the City Council on Monday night. Mr. Gleason is requesting that a portion of the letter of credit be returned to the lending institution, based upon the work completed to date. ". CITY OF SHOREWOOD May 22, 2001 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn..us' cityhq"@c~&rulre~od.r'{lJ:l.uli, M .1 . Transmlttea Via l.,;ertmea al Mr. Bill Gleason, Sylvia Development, LP 8525 Edinbrook Crossing Brooklyn Park,:MN 55443 eRE: Written 10 Day Notice for Default of Contract Shorewood Ponds Development Dear Mr. Gleason: i In accordance with Section 35 Sub. (03) (a), this letter is to serre as written notice for Remedies of Default of the Development Agreement which was entered into by Sylvia Development, LP and the City of Shorewood for the Shorewood Ponds Development. Dated October 28, 1999. On May 16, 2001 a site inspection was conducted to review site conditions as it relates to erosion controls, general site conditions, and restoration measures required by said Development Agreement. The following individuals were in attendance of that meeting: Name Representine: e Bill Gleason Sylvia Development J Larry Brown City of Shorewood Phil Tipka WSB and Associates, Inc. Review of the site indicated that the site was in violation of erosion ~ontrol measures, sedimentation on the roadways, and washing of berm, landscapes areas, and pond side-slop~s. , i In accordance with the Development Agreement, Section 13 Grading~'Drainage. and Erosion Cont~ols states the following: i "Developer at its expense shall provide grading, drainage arid erosion control plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Said plans shall provide for temporary dams, . earthwork, or other such devices and practices, including seeding of graded areas, as necessary, to prevent washing, flooding, sedimentation and erosion of lands and streets within and outside the plat during all phases of construction, Developer shall keep all streets within and adjoining the plat free of all dirt and debris resultingfrom construction therein by the Developer, its agents or assignees. " ft ~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Attachment 1 ." Mr. Bill Gleason Sylvia Development Corporation May 22,2001 Page 2 of3 i i i During site inspections, it was determined that the following items are\ found to be in violation of the Development Agreement cited above, the Grading and Erosion Contrql Plans, and the Permit issued by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: ! 1. Silt fencing has not been installed behind the back of curb along Lots 6,7 & 8 of Block 2 for areas that have been graded and left exposed in excess of a four month tUne period. 2. Silt fencing has not been installed behind the back of curb adjacent Lots 14, 15 & 16 of Block 22 for areas that have been graded and left exposed in excess of a four month time period. 3. Silt fencing has not been installed behind the back of curb adja:cent Lot 28 of Block 2 for areas that . have been graded and left exposed in excess ofa four month time period. 4. Silt fences have not been installed properly along Lots 5,8,9,14,13,16,17,20,21 &24. All silt fences shall be anchored on the bottom edge. I ! 5. Silt fences have deteriorated north of Lot 8 Block 2, and along both sides of the asphalt trail adjacent Lots 23 Block 2. I ! The berm adjacent Lots 27,30,31,34,35,38 of Block 2 has no~ been stabilized. Erosion of the berm has silted in the ditch between the park property and the subject site, and has obstructed the storm sewer system in this area. The ditch is to be reestablishtd and sodded to insure stabilization. Similarly the berm is to be prepared, seeded, and mulched in i accordance to conditions of the permit issued by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Side slopes for the NURP Pond have not been stabilized, and are eroding in to the available storage. capacity of the pond. 6. 7. 8. Areas, which have not to received sod, have not been seeded and mulched in accordance to the permit issued by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Best Practices Manual. 9. Many sections of the tree protection fencing are in need of repair All streets within the subdivision have silt and debris present. i 10. 11. Two rolls of sod have not been installed behind the back bf curb as indicated in the Plans and I Specifications for the project. ! ! 12. Tree protection fencing has been compromised in several area~ by building activities. ! 13. Rock construction entrances have not been installed on sites th~t have not had driveways installed. 14. The flow capacity of the storm sewer system has been compromised by erosion from the site. .., Mr. Bill Gleason Sylvia Development Corporation May 22, 2001 Page 3 of3 I I In accordance with the Development Agreement, these items are td be corrected within 10 days from the receipt of this letter. The City of Shorewood will give no additiona!l notice. Correction of these items to bring the site back into compliance with the Development Agreeme~t, Plans and Specifications, and Permit issued by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District must include the following: I 1. Installation and inspection of all silt fences indicated in violat~ons 1 through 5 cited above; I 2. Preparation, placement of topsoil, and seeding of areas disturbed by construction, including but not limited to, the berm and pond side slopes as cited in violations!6, 7, and 8 above. .3. Inspection and repair of all tree protection fencing for the site. 4. Installation of topsoil and two rolls of sod behind the curb in all areas that have not been stabilized. 5. Placement of rock construction entrances to all \sites where driveways have not been installed. 6. The storm sewer system shall be cleaned, as necessary, to restore the design capacity of the stormwater runoff system. . Failure to correct these items by May 31, 2001 shall cause the City of Shorewood to draw upon the Letter of Credit No NAS377968 issued by Wells Fargo HSBCj Trade Bank, N.A. In addition, in accordance with Section 35 Additional Remedies Sub. (03) c, a he~ring will be scheduled in front of the Shorewood City Council for June 11,2001 at the Shorewood Ci~ Hall at 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m., to determine the Plan or Policy that has been violated, and what further action is to take place, in accordance with the Developme~t Agreement. i I If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 1952-474-3236 during normal business ~~ i Sincerely, ~--i~ ~ Larry Brown, PE Director of Public Works cc: Mayor and City Council Craig Dawson, City Administrator Brad Nielsen, Planning Director Tim Keane, City Attorney Bonnie Burton, Finance Director Alice Leung, Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, NA 'J CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128. www.cLshorewoop.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council .~.. "~i Larry Brown, Director of Public works" ':. June 21,2001 t FROM: DATE: . i i i During the public hearing process conducted in consideration [of the Cub Foods proposal, several residents stated concerns with regard to Lake Linden Drive. Cfoncerns voiced were with regard to motorists speeding around the sharp curves, and the amOl~nt of cut through traffic present. Attachment 1 is an excerpt from the half section maps which i indicates the right of way for Lake Linden Drive. Report on Lake Linden Drive RE: Lake Linden Drive is part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway system. As an MSA road, funds collected by the State and held in account by the State, can be used to reconstruct and maintain such roadways. . On August 24, 1992, the City Council passed a resolution requesting that that Minnesota Department of Transportation review the roadwayfor a 20-mile, per hour speed limit. Unfortunately, the street record for Lake Linden Drive contained page 1 of th~ . response letter by l\1N/DOT (refer to Attachment 2). Regardless, the letter is clear that a 30-mile p;er hour limit is to remain, with speed advisory signs for 20 miles per hour (as exists today). I , In 1993 the City's consulting engineer OSM .and Associates, I~c prepared a preliminary layout for realignment of a portion of Lake Linden Drive (refer to AttacIkent 3). While this appears to be a start, this does not address all of the issues. Items, which w9re not considered in the preliminary design, are safe alignment of the entire roadway between TruqIc Highway 7 and Yellowstone Trail and a safe means oftravel alongthe roadway for pedestrians. I Recently, the Planning Commission has suggested that an open house style meeting be conducted to receive further feedback from residents of the area, regarding Lake Linden Drive. The Planning Commission suggested that either the City Councilor Planning Commission conduct such a meeting. Staff concurs with this action. If found acceptable to the City Council, . the Planning Commission could add this item to their proposed work schedule. ft ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER .:#8C :lO ( 21) ''71"-1, '" p- ~A I ~Ol'O <~ ~@~~ ! , 1,9 ~ 12 .; .. ~ (24) '3!lQ.85 (........;.1' ZOI: 200 ... -,~ III I" 1'3 ~~ '" (9) ~j II ( \0) :X (17) .... 14 ~ ". 1'3' 52' - 0.10'00' .. R.5T3.0 1..1'38.1 ZOi (60 :8 1 ~. (27) 200\- \ , , I , I I I , \Ill '1'\ 1- "N , I , I L____!~~~_____ '8 t:;- .; il ~ 6:7:~. ~ I!:!Y (26) : ~200\ <fl: . ,';:J: (25) '-;:'.-- ~ :8 ~ ."J-4~.. _~., ' ~1~ -. """" ". . 3 (~~ t-'" 200\ ('3) ... ~ (2) -- -- -- 1 ( 19) 111 r-::-'!.-- ~ ....... '3: :. (33) N '" ... ( 1) ( 2) 154.25 ... ~ ....f ..... . '" '" ~ 112 :; /.... 1.91 /52 ~ ~ ~~~ ') - . '360.14 ~ 't. I (27) -- - ;,- /a .. Attachment 1 . !t. , ~L I I L:.Q!. .... . . MAYOR Barb Bra neel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 September 14, 1992 Mr. Bud Dixon, Traffic supervisor Minnesota Department of Transportation 5801 Duluth Street Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Dear Mr. Dixon, At their meeting of August 24, 1992 the Shorewood city council directed me to contact the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting a speed study be done on :yake Linden Drive between Highway 7 and Yellowstone Trail. Lake Linden Drive is on Shorewood Municipal State Aid system and is likely to be apriority to be rebuilt in the next few years. In the meantime the City council feels the very dangerous curve and increasing traffic demand a review and a reduction in speed to perhaps 20 mph until the road is reconstructed. Please consider this a request for the above described speed study. Thank you for your assistance in this very important matter of public safety. sincerely, ~ITY OF SHOREWOOD ^ cHl'LW C ~\lvV>V' {, ames C. Hurm .lci ty Administrator Attachment A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's Soutl ATTACHMJi3NT 2 f(~\t\~E~SO~ ~ :l:i ~ i~ 'I ?- OF TP.~ Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 R' I 5801 Duluth Street Golden Valley, MN 55422 ep y to 612-591-4618 Telephone No. Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 SEP '2 9 \992 '.". September 28, 1992 James C. Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Speed Zoning - Lake Linden Drive City of Shorewood . Dear Mr. Hurm: The speed zoning study for Lake Linden Drive requested in your September 14th letter has been completed. Based on the study results and as discussed with you last Friday, we have recommended authorization of the following speed limit for Lake Linden Drive: 30 mph - between the intersection with Trunk Highway 7 and the intersection with Yellowstone Trail The study and recommended speed limit is currently being reviewed by MnjDOT's Traffic Engineering Office in St. Paul which will make the final speed limit determination. As soon . as the review has been completed, a formal speed limit authorization for Lake Linden Drive will be issued to Shorewood. Enclosed for your information is a copy of a radar speed sample obtained during the study. The speed pattern revealed by the sample is a primary reason why we do not believe the 20 mph speed limit suggested by the city would be a reasonable restriction. (A correct speed limit will have a substantial percentage of voluntary compliance and minimize the range of speed within the traffic flow. Both of these objectives are being met by the inplace 30 mph speed limit.) In addition, we could find no indication from Department of Public Safety accident records that existing speed patterns have resulted in a high accident rate. An Equal Opportunity Employer .+1 o It) ! cD o ~ 9 ~ ::>> o 20' ,al <=) ~ z 9 ~ 5 ~ U) - . ,09 - I.&J ~. 0::.- Oz z~ ~~ z- -~ ~C'.[ ~:~ ~R!i~ z~ i 6 M ! n t + I I...... ~t l \." " \ + ~~~,!C . o . ~' ST. s,. - , .0 . o a j II) ~ ...... ~ e ..::::: ~ ~ ~ .... .... I'- rt) Q) .. ~ . .. ~ 0 0 N ~ 2 . . ex: D ~ 2 0 " CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewood.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewQod.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 20 June 2001 RE: Merry Lane - Petition for Limited Parking Restriction FILE NO.: Central (Streets - Merry Lane) . Residents on Merry Lane (see Street Location map - Exhibit A, attached) have requested parking restrictions for their street to alleviate problems associated with overflow boat trailer parking from the Merry Lane public access. "No Parking" signs are in place for the new. portion of the street, but do not include the cul-de-sac itself. The petition (see Exhibit B) requests that the cul-de-sac be posted, and that residents begiven periodic guest parking permits. Staff has suggested to the petitioners that the street be posted with "No Boat Trailer Parking" signs. This would preclude the overflow parking while still allowing residents or their guests to park on the street. The contact person for the petition agrees with that recommendation. Attachment C is a resolution ordering the posting of new signs for the' entire street. Adoption of the resolution requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Cc: Craig Dawson Larry Brown Ron Zenk ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER :/I:. bD CITY OF GREENWOOD ~ ST ALBANS BA Y . CHRISTMAS LAKE 500 I o 500 Feet 1 ~ N , ~h~b\t A PETITION J :J)1~ 0 1 ,', ,', P'J t.uu .. To: Shorewood City Planner Shorewood City Council Members . "-.<." -"""0",.- ; Petition Request We, the attached residential homeowners, whose properties are located on Merry Lane and who share access to the residential cul-de-sac at the end of Merry Lane, do hereby respectfully request the following: 1. That public boat trailer parking be prohibited in the above cul-de-sac; and 2. That homeowners with property along Meny Lane be issued parking pennits to enable their guests to park on Merry Lane in front of their residence. . Background The City of Shorewood and the DNR maintain the Christmas Lake public boat landing in our neighborhood. The City has provided adequate parking for boat trailers near the boat landing with a fixed number of spaces. This has served its purpose well for many years. With the recent expansion of Merry Lane into our residential neighborhood, boaters have discovered the new cul-de-sac and now many are occupying it with their boat trailers for the entire day and into the evening. Frequently, but especially on nights and weekends, we cannot access and use the cul-de-sac because it has become an overflow parking lot for boaters using the public landing. . 111 addition, both sides of Merry Lane in front of our residential property leading up to the cul-de-sac is currently posted as a no-parking zone. TIns makes it difficult for our guests to park near our homes when they come to visit. Conclusion We therefore have no guest parking on the street and cannot use tlle neighborhood cul-de- sac. On the other hand, removal ofthe parking ban on Merry Lane would result in boat trailers parked 011 Merry Lane in addition to the cul-de-sac. We do not believe that the intention of the City was to use the cul-de-sac for overflow boat trailer parking or to prevent our guests from parking in. front of our residence. Accordingly, we request both a ban on boat trailers in the cul-de-sac and permits to allow guests to park in front of our homes. Thank you for your consideration. S<h ~ '0\ -t e::> 5660 Merry Lane .. Keith Waters and Associates, Developer of Christmas Shores 5690 Merry Lane Krista D. Fragola 5695 Merry Lane ~../ ,~.-' ',.... ~~ : on A. Zenk 5725 Merry Lane W c i?~eit ~t:hlU~" W. Robert Anderson . ~755 Merry Lane ~~fi. .;)~~, Maureen R. Bruce - James A. Fragola . i1d r Ron d . Zenk 1 . Qt~ ,./ James W. Bruce V ~. UO/.~.l.'1~UU.L .J.....~u ....l'1.4. UL~ V'_"'Z VVV-Z B5/3~/2001 00:58 9529377667 ~~u.. "'~HDMANETIC:Sn I-'A~'''~ FRO!", : PROJECT CONSUL T I NG GROUP a6/3l/2~el el:88 ~529377b57 FAX NO. 6123300121 HU~ANETICS Jun. 01 2001 08:28AM Pi I"'(.\o.:lc:.. \,I.... 5660 Mer11 Lane Keith Waters and Associates. Developer of Christmas Shores 569S Meay Laae Karen 1. Peterson 5720 Merry Lane . Lori A. z. Ronald ]. Zenk !'725 Merry LaDe W,RobertAnderscn 5750 Mert1 Lane Marissa M. Frankentie1d .. Greg G. Frankenfield . 5755 MelT)' Lane Maureen R. Bruce lames W. Bruce '1. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING "NO BOAT TRAILER PARKING" ON PORTIONS OF MERRY LANE WHEREAS, residents of Christmas Shore have petitioned the City Council to restrict boat trailer parking on the portion of Merry Lane that abuts their lots; WHEREAS, parking restrictions have been imposed on streets in the vicinity of the Merry Lane public water access to prohibit overflow parking from the public access; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1.) The Department of Public Works is hereby directed to install "NO BOAT TRAll...ER PARKING" signs along all portions of Merry Lane that are within the plat of Christmas Shore. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of June, 2001. Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Craig W. Dawson, City Administrator/Clerk ~h;b,-+ C" . TO: CITY OF I SHOREWOOD , i 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' WWW.CLshOrewood~mn.uS' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us I i Mayor and City Council 1 ~J~ ' Larry Brow, n, Director of Public Works p June 21,2001 / . I MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: . RE: Glen Road Drainage Report Mr. Joe Lugowski, petitioner for the project, has requested that this report be moved to the July 9th City Council meeting when all of the City Council members can ~e present. . #'lE ... t.~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I 1 I I CITY OF I SHOREWOOD ! 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOq, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (952) 474-3236 FAX (952) 474-0128' www.cLshorewoo~.mn.us' cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council dlJ.f Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~V June 21,2001 FROM: DATE: . RE: Resolution Designating a No Parking Zone on St. Alban's Bay Road In accordance with the plans for the South Shore Community Park, a No Parking zone is to be established along St. Albans Bay Road in the vicinity of the Par~. 1 It is recommended that this zone be established to minimize ~ctivity outside the park site, and to insure that there is a clear line of visibility for safe travel ofpede~trians entering and leaving the park. i Staifis recommending approval of the resolution that establishe~ a No Parking zone along St. Albans Bay Road. . :It <g F ft t.~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER