Loading...
011000 CC Reg Agp ., oj: CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 2000 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love _ Stover _ Garfunkel_ Lizee _ Zerby _ B. Review Agenda C. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Making Appointments (Att.-#lC Proposed Resolution) 2. APPROVALOFMINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 13, 1999'(Att.-#2A Minutes) B. City Council Special Meeting Minutes December 15, 1999 (Att.-#2B minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. A Motion to Authorizing Revised Job Descriptions for Liquor Operations (Att.- #3A Job Descriptions) B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution for Change Order Number 1 for Trunk Highway 7 Access Closures (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution and Change Order) C. AMotion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposal from Munitech, Inc. for the Year 2000 .(Att.-#3C Proposed Resolution and Engineer's Memorandum) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Refuse Hauler Licenses for the Year 2000 (Att.-#3D Proposed Resolution) E. Consideration of a Motion to Approve an Agreement for Legal Services (Att.-#3E Proposed Agreement) .. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 10, 2000 PAGE20F3 ' F. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1300 _ License, Permit, Service Charges and Miscellaneous Fees (Att.-#3F Proposed Ordinance) G. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of the City Administrator/Clerk and Appointing an Acting Administrator/Clerk (Att.-#3G Proposed Resolution) NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removedfromthe Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked foUowing removal from Consent Agenda. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held December 14, 1999 (Att.-#5A Draft Minutes) B. Presentation on Skate Park Request by Matt Pike 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative A. Consideration of a Motion toAdopt a Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Plan (Att.-#6A Revised Trail Section; Proposed Resolution) 7. GENERAL A. Discussion on Reorganization of Staff Positions 1) A Motion Accepting the Job Description for Planning AssistantJWeb Developer (Att.-#7Al Job Description) 2) A Motion Authorizing Appointment of Pamela Helling as Planning AssistantIW eb Developer (Att.-#7 A2 Acting Administrator's Memorandum) 3) A Motion Accepting the Job Descriptions for Receptionist/Park Secretary and Receptionist/Secretary (Att.-#? A3 Job Descriptions) 4) A Motion Authorizing Appointment of Twila Grout as Receptionist/Park" Secretary (Att.-#7A4 Acting Administrator's Memorandum) 5) A Motion Accepting the Job Description for Engineering Technician (See Att.-#7A5 Memorandum) ... . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. JANUARY 10,2000 PAGE 3 OF 3 6) Consideration of a Motion Authorizing the Advertisement of a Full-Time Receptionist/ Secretary (Att. --#7A6 Acting Administrator's Memorandum) B. Set a Date for Work Session on Issues and Goals for 2000lReview 1999 Goals (Att.--#7B 1999 Goals) C. A Motion Authorizing AT&T Wireless Services to Apply. for a Conditional Use Permit for Telecommunications Equipment on the Minnewashta Water Tower (Att.#7C Letter from AT&T) D. Consideration of a Motion to Approve Installation of a Street Light at Driveway Entrance to Southshore Center (Att.--#7D Planner's Memorandum) E. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution concerning the Special Fire Department Review Committee (Att.--#7E Proposed Resolution) F. Discussion on Extending the Hennepin County Assessing Agreement (Att.-#7F Letter from Hennepin County) 8. ENGINEERINGJPUBLIC WORKS A. Shorewood Ponds Water Loop Feasibility Report (Att.-#8A) B. Discussion of the Gideon's Glen Wetland Delineation Report (Att.--#8B) 9. REPORTS: A. Administrator & Staff Discussion Regarding Bo Witrak.Letter of December 13, 1999 in Addressing the Deer Population at Minnetonka Country Club (AttA#9A Letter From Bo Witrak) Y2K Update B. Mayor and City Council Report on Fire Department Review Committee Meeting Held December. 14, 1999 10. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att.--#10) t!!t ~ . r ., .. ~, . .-.. r,_. f! . ~ ". ',' t.J ..:':l'j .~- .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, January 10,2000 Agenda Item #IC: This resolution sets forth the Mayor's proposal for appointments for the corning year. It is suggested as a starting point for discussion. Modifications, if any can be made at the meeting. Ultimately, this requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #3A: Although the liquor operation job descriptions have been completed, this item has been postponed, pending review of the descriptions by the Liquor Committee. Agenda Item #3B: This is a resolution which approves change order 1 for the Trunk Highway 7 Access Control Project. An additional $3,900 was expended to import granular material to replace poor subgrade soils encountered during construction. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. Agenda Item #3C: This resolution accepts the proposal from Munitech Inc. for continued operation of the municipal water and wastewater systems for the year 2000. Fees have been increased from approximately $6,900 per month to $7,100 per month. The increase was anticipated in the budget already approved by the City Council. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution which accepts Munitech' s proposal for a one- year term. Agenda Item #3D: This resolution approves licenses for four more refuse haulers. Approval requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #3E: Approval of the City Attorney's contract for 2000 requires a simple majority vote. Agenda Item #3F: Staff has identified a number of areas where the City's fee schedule should be updated. Changes are shown with strikeouts and italics. If adopted, these fees would go into effect upon publication (19 January). Approval requires a simple majority vote. Agenda Item #3G: This resolution constitutes official action relative to Jim Hurm's resignation and Brad Nielsen's appointment as Acting Administrator. Approval requires a simple majority vote. ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER .,#fa "::J Agenda Item #6A: The Planning Director has made a brief change to the Trails element of the Comprehensive Plan, hopefully reflecting the Council's direction. In addition, the Trail Concept map is being revised to show the status of various trail segments that have already been studied by the Park Commission. The map may be sent out under separate cover or distributed at the meeting Monday night. The resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan requires a four-fifths vote by the Council. Agenda Item 7 A: Due to changes in staffing and changing of responsibilities for City Hall Office Staff, it is recommended that certain job descriptions be revised or added to the staffing positions for City Hall. In summary, Pamela Helling will move to Patti Helgesen's position and Twila Grout will move to Pamela's position. As the Planning Director has mentioned, Patti has agreed to postpone her leaving in order to help out while we are shorthanded. It is recommended that the second front desk position not be made part-time as previously discussed. Rationale for this recommendation is included in the Planning Director's memorandum. . A job description has been drafted for a newly created position to aid the City Engineer / Director of Public Works in the day to day permit reviews, record keeping, and fulfilling inquiries made by the public and other agencies. Funding for the position is being proposed from the sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer funds. Approval of the various employee decisions requires a simple majority vote. Agenda Item 7B: There are a number of issues that need to be discussed, such as a hiring process for the City Administrator position, interviews of various commission applicants and goals for 2000. A report will be sent out under separate cover giving the status of a number of items that need to be resolved in the near future. Agenda Item 7C: AT & T has asked permission to apply for a conditional use permit to locate antenna facilities on the Minnewashta water tower. This motion only gives them permission to apply. . Agenda Item 7D: Representatives of the Senior Center have asked that a street light be located at the northerly access to the City Hall/Senior Center property. The light appears to comply with the City's policy for street lighting. Notice has been sent to property owners within 500 feet of the proposed location. Approval requires a simple majority vote by the City Council. Agenda Item 7E: This resolution is a response to recent actions by the City of Excelsior relative to the Fire Department study currently under way. 2 (.. . . Agenda Item 7F: Hennepin County has requested that the City decide if it is willing to continue assessing services for the next four years. The current contract requires a l50 notice if we intend to discontinue service. The Council may wish to discuss this item at a study seSSIOn. Agenda Item 8A: This item is discussion of a feasibility report prepared by WSB and Associates which lays out three alternatives for the looping of watermain for the Shorewood Ponds project. The City Engineer will review the feasibility report in detail at Monday night's meeting. Agenda Item 8B: This item is a motion to accept the feasibility report for the Gideon's Glen Wetland Delineation Report prepared by WSB and Associates. Staff is recommending approval of the motion to accept the feasibility report. Agenda Item 9Ai. The deer problem has been forwarded to the Land Conservation and Environment committee for their review and comment. Agenda Item 9A ii: Y2K was uneventful. The City of Shorewood did not incur any complications of equipment or operating systems due to the date change. 3 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO CERTAIN OFFICES AND POSITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD FOR THE YEAR 2000 WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the Shorewood City Council to make annual appointments to fill certain offices and positions within the City government at the beginning of each year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the following persons are appointed to the following offices and positions until the 2000 City Council organizational meeting: . Acting Mayor: Council member Council Representatives to: a. Park Commission Liaison: Planning Commission Liaison: Liquor Stores: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission: Association of Metro Municipalities: Coordinating Committee South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department: Backup to Mayor on Coordinating Committee South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department: Backup to Mayor on Excelsior Fire Department Special Review Committee: b. c. d. e. f. g. . h. 1. Representatives to Affiliated Organizations: a. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District: b. Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission: c. Minnetonka Community Services: City Attorney: Tim Keane, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. City Prosecutor: Ken Potts -*FIe CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION No. 00- Page Two: Annual Appointments 2000 Emergency Preparedness Director: SLMPSD Police Chief Bryan Litsey Official Depositories: Beacon Bank, 4M Fund & other Depositures as necessary Official Newspaper: Sun Sailor (official publications shall simultaneously be published in the Laker to cover Enchanted and Shady Island residents) Weed Inspector: Mayor Woody Love Assistant Weed Inspectors: Charles Davis & Joe Lugowski . 2. That the Blanket Bond (Official Bonds) is approved. 3. That such appointments shall take effect on the date hereof and shall continue for the remainder of the year or until such time as a successor is appointed by the City Council. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 10TH day of J"nuary, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR . ATTEST: BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR ( .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1999 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 'i\ ~)'lIl1' J..;"'.' '..:......., 0.,.,..\.... }.~~.f;'i', .r..... '.~ i'l ,I." ..e U :,a'i&! ~ Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Stover and Zerby; City Administrator Hurm; City Attorney Keane; Finance Director Rolek; Planning Director Nielsen; Public Works Director/Engineer Brown Absent: None . B. Review Agenda Mayor Love read the Agenda for December 13, 1999. Councilmember Lizee requested Item 3A be moved to Item 71 Councilmember Stover requested Item 10 show the Council would reconvene into an Executive Session following this Regular City Council Meeting. The agenda was approved as amended. Lizee moved, Stover seconded, accepting the agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 6, 1999 . Zerby moved, Stover seconded, approving the Regular Meeting Minutes for December 6, 1999, as amended on Page 3, Item 9ii, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1, change "Smithtown Right-of- Way Projecf' to "County Road 19 Intersection Project"; Page 4, Section 9B, Paragraph 3, Sentence 2, change "manor" to "manner"; Page 4, Item 10, change "Adjourn to Executive Session Subject to Approval of Claims" to "Adjourn to Executive Session to Discuss Personnel Matters." Motion passed 5/0. B. City Council Special Meeting Minutes December 6,1999 Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, approving the Special Meeting Minutes for December 6, 1999, as submitted. Motion passed 5/0. C. City Council Executive Session Minutes December 6, 1999 Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, approving the Executive Session Minutes for December 6, 1999, as submitted. Motion passed 5/0. #2A -. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13, 1999 - PAGE 2 3. CONSENT AGENDA Lizee moved, Stover seconded approving the Motions contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions therein: A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Year 2000 Refuse Hauler Licenses(Removed from the Consent Agenda and moved to Item 71.) B. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-108. "A Resolution Approving Year 2000 Tree Trimmer Licenses" C. A Motion Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement with ASFCME for the Years 2000/2001 Motion passed 5/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no matters from the floor. . 5. PARKS-Report by Representative There was nothing to report at this time. 6. PLANNING-Report by Representative Commissioner Bailey reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the December 7, 1999, meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). Director Nielsen provided background information on the Simple Subdivision/Combination listed below. A. 7:15 P.M. Public Hearing - Vacate DrainagelUtility Easement Applicant: James Bruce Location: 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trail . Mayor Love opened the Public Hearing to consider the Vacation of Easements at 7:15 P.M. Having no one present from the public to speak on this matter, Mayor Love closed the Public Comment portion of the Hearing at 7:16 P.M. Councilmember Zerby noted the resolution should have been published in The Laker as well as The Sun Sailor. Councilmember Stover stated she thought having a notice appear in both papers was something the Council had discussed previously in the year and should be happening as part of process so that all Shorewood residents received notice. Mayor Love commented on the importance of having this occur in the future. Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-109. "A Resolution Approving Vacation of DrainagelUtility Easements for James Bruce, 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trail." Motion passed 5/0. f CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13, 1999 - PAGE 3 The Public Hearing considering the Vacation of Easements was closed at 7:18 P.M. B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Simple Subdivision/Combination Applicant: James Bruce Location: 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trail Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-110, "A Resolution Approving a Simple Subdivision/Combination for James Bruce, 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trail." Motion passed 5/0. C. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Plan . Director Nielsen provided a brief overview and summarization of the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. He noted there was a revision to page HO-11 which now states specific costs for housing redevelopment in Community Development Block Grant Funds in 1995 and 1996 and how, more recently, the City has effectively pooled its monies with other Hennepin County communities for housing rehabilitation work. He also stated that upon approval from the Council, the Comprehensive Plan is forwarded to the Met Council and other adjoining communities for approval and comment. While awaiting approval from the Met Council, the City does use the Comprehensive Plan as a guide plan. Mayor Love stated that following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City will begin looking at sites for senior housing. Director Nielsen responded that the Comprehensive Plan identifies issues and makes suggestions for revisions/updates for the Senior Housing Needs Study and the Site Analysis Study to be examined in a Work Session format in January. Stover moved, Zerby seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-111, "A Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Plan." . Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concern about labeling prioritization of trails on the Trail map in the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Zerby stated that the Trail Concept Plan shows where trails could most likely go in terms of natural features, safety concerns, and other information. Director Nielsen commented Council had previously expressed consensus about showing only potential trails on the Concept Trail Plan, and the map will be amended to reflect this change. Councilmember Stover suggested redoing the map to reflect the original intentions of the Park Commission. Councilmember Zerby stated he would like to see a historical representation of potential trails remain in the Plan so that residents could see where potential trails may be located when purchasing a home in the area. Director Nielsen stated the Park Commission had designated these routes as being potential trails based on certain criteria, such as linking to other trails, points of interest within the City, and traffic usage of specific roadways. He expressed concern about citizens buying homes in the area with no information related to where potential trails may lie. Mayor Love expressed concern that residents may feel as though their interests had not been heard with removal of the map. , CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13, 1999. PAGE 4 Councilmember Zerby suggested including citizen input on the map as well, thus, recording input as well as the planning process for the trails. Councilmember Garfunkel stated he would be amenable to this idea as long as additional text would be included to state these are just potential ideas for trails not necessarily priority routes. Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, amending the motion for passage of the Plan with stipulation that Staff report back to Council at the January 10, 2000, meeting. Motion passed 5/0. Councilmember Garfunkel stated overall the Comprehensive Plan captures the spirit of the Council. Director Nielsen suggested revising text as noted and bringing this resolution back before Council at the January 10, 2000, meeting. 7. General A. Request for Donation for South Lake Area War Memorial . Council chose to skip this item until Mr. Ken Koehnen could be present at this meeting to discuss the Memorial. This item was discussed following Item 9 Alii. B. COnSideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2000 Budgets and Approving the 1999 Property Tax Collectible in 2000 Director Rolek briefly reviewed matters considered and actions taken at the December 6, 1999, Truth in Taxation Public Hearing as detailed in the minutes of the December 6, 1999, City Council Special Meeting. Stover moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 112, "A Resolution Approving the 2000 Budgets and Approving the 1999 Property Tax Collectible in 2000." Motion passed 5/0. C. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing the 2000 Pay Scale . Administrator Hurm briefly reviewed matters considered and actions taken at the December 6, 1999, Truth in Taxation Public Hearing as detailed in the minutes of the December 6, 1999, City Council Special Meeting. Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 113, "A Resolution Establishing the 2000 Pay Scale." Motion passed 5/0. D. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1300- Water and Sewer Rates Director Rolek briefly reviewed matters considered and actions taken at the December 6, 1999, Truth in Taxation Public Hearing as detailed in the minutes of the December 6, 1999, City Council Special Meeting. 11 ~ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13,1999 - PAGE 5 Mayor Love noted this is an ordinance amending Section 1301.02 of the City Code of Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Charges. Lizee moved, Zerby seconded, Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 359, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1300, Section 1301.02 of the City Code, Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Charges." Motion passed 5/0. E. A Motion Considering the Hiring of a Senior Accounting Clerk and Update on Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk Position Administrator Hurm provided information on hiring of a Senior Accounting Clerk, but noted he would like extend the deadline of hiring until approximately January 10,2000. Stover moved, Lizee seconded, approving the hiring of a Senior Accounting Clerk. Motion passed 5/0. . In an answer to Councilmember Lizee's question on potential start date for the applicant, Director Rolek stated the applicant will be starting on December 27, 1999. F. Consideration of a Motion Authorizing the Creation of a Part-Time Receptionist/Secretary Position and Authorizing Advertisement Administrator Hurm reviewed information on reorganization of staff positions. Councilmember Stover recognized and supported the need for additional technical assistance in the Department of Public Works/Engineering, but questioned the idea of a shared part-time Receptionist. Garfunkel moved authorizing the Creation of Part-Time Receptionist/Secretary Position. Motion failed as there was no second. G. A Motion Accepting the Job Description for SecretarylReceptionist Part- Time and ReceptionistlPark Secretary . Councilmember Stover noted without approval of Item 7F, there was no need for this motion. No motion was forthcoming on this matter. H. Consideration of Authorization for an Appraisal for the Gideon Glen Project Director Brown stated wetland delineation was completed this fall for this projec. He noted the draft report does not include the survey, because there were some discrepancies i the boundaries of the original wetland delineation held by the property owner, Mr. Sims. This s ey is complete, and Director Brown stated he would share the survey with Council as soon as he received it. Stover moved, Zerby seconded, Approving Authorization for Staff to Seek Gideon Glen Project, not to exceed $1,000. Motion passed 5/0. , CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13,1999 - PAGE 6 I. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Year 2000 Refuse Hauler Licenses (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion and consideration.) Mayor Love and Councilmember Lizee questioned the small number of applicants for the upcoming year. Administrator Hurm responded it was for two reasons. First, some of the waste haulers have been acquired by other companies, and second, it is still early for all license applications to submitted. Mayor Love and Councilmember Lizee also expressed concern for the number of trucks hauling refuse through the streets. In response to Councilmember Zerby's question, Administrator Hurm noted the total cost for application and license to be $50.00. Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-114, "A Resolution Approving Year 2000 Refuse Hauler Licenses." Motion passed 5/0. 8. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS . Director Brown stated he had nothing to report at this time. 9. REPORTS A. Administrator and Staff i. Project Reports Director Nielsen stated he was waiting for a map of the wetland delineation and approval of the motion for appraisals on the Gideon Glen Project. Director Brown reported the model home construction had been started on the Shorewood Ponds Project so there are a number of permits in for review. The roadway portion of the project is complete except for the last layer of asphalt and the trail. . Mayor Love requested a status report on the City Multipurpose Building Project. Director Brown stated it is in the design stage and will be talking more about this at the December 14, 1999, Park Commission Meeting. He has met with an architect and finalized some of the last details. He noted Administrator Hurm met with the Park Foundation, and they are beginning funding efforts. Sanitary sewer and utilities have been designed for the project. He anticipates being able to bid these projects in S~ring of 2000 as promised. Work has begun oJ the Old Market Road Retaining Wall Project and should be completed soon. The Trunk Highway 7 Access Closure Projects have been completed except for the final punch-list to be completed in the Spring of 2000. He noted there have been cars traveling from the minor road to Highway 7 so additional signage and barricades have been erected so this does not continue. ", .. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13, 1999 - PAGE 7 Councilmember Zerby questioned whether the deed had been properly recorded for the vacant land to be used for the potential Skateboard Park along Highway 7. Director Brown reported that the deed was recorded properly. Mayor Love stated the Morning Rotary had expressed an interest in meeting to discuss contribution to the Skateboard Park. Councilmember Zerby questioned progress made on the Mill Road street light requested by the citizens. NSP reports that it should be installed within a week's time. Councilmember Zerby questioned whether the abandoned driveways along Highway 7 in the Shorewood Pond area would be removed. Director Brown explained it is the developer's responsibility to remove them and with approval of certain permit conditions expects them to be removed. ii. Board on Innovation and Cooperation Preliminary Grant Application . Administrator Hurm summarized information on the preliminary grant applications process for the Board on Innovation and Cooperation. He noted that these are at pre-application stage, and at this point there is no commitment from the City to do anything. The Board will simply report on a ranking of these applications, and then the City can determine at that time .if further action should be taken. Mayor Love expressed support for the South Lake Minnetonka Grant. Councilmember Stover stated these all appear to be worthwhile programs. iii. Report on Light Request on Manor RoadlSt. Alban's Bay RdJSuburban Drive Director Nielsen stated policy includes sending notice to everyone within 500 feet of the proposed location of the streetlight and this will be done prior to the January 10, 2000, City Council Meeting. In addition, there may be another request that night for a light at the north end of the City Hall parking lot as the entrance/exit to the Senior Center. . At this time Council chose to move to Item 7 A as Mr. Ken Koehnen was now present to speak on this matter. Mr. Ken Koehnen provided background on the process to bring the Excelsior Area War Memorial to fruition. Names of the twenty-seven individuals from this area killed in Wodd Wars I and II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War would be included on the Memorial.. He stated the Memorial would be erected in the Excelsior Commons area because the soldiers spent free time in this area when they were alive. He noted he has not only the names and ranks of the soldiers, but also where they served and perished. The Memorial would possibly be erected and dedicated as part of the July 4,2000, celebration. Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded, Approving a Request for Donation for the South Lake War Memorial. Councilmember Zerby questioned whether the two designs given to Council were tentative ideas for the Memorial. Mr. Koehnen stated they were dependent on the amourtt of funding received as to which of the Memorials would actually be erected. # " CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES December 13,1999 - PAGE 8 Motion passed 5/0. B. Mayor and City Council Mayor Love stated he had been contacted by the Minnetonka Country Oub regarding the damage done to the greens by the deer. Administrator Hurm reported on findings from other communities on handling deer problems in those areas. Council expressed support for hearing from experts on how to handle this problem as well. Mayor Love also reported there is another Fire Review Meeting on December 14, 1999. Councilmember Stover requested an organizational meeting on January 3, 2000. Mayor Love stated he would be unable to attend that evening and perhaps it could be put off until later in the year as Council had discussed previously. 10. Adjournment Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, adjourning the Regular Meeting to Executive Session at 8:15 P.M. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 5/0. . RES PECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, Sally Keefe, Recording Secretary ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR . BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR '" ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDA Y, DECEMBER 15, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES DRAFT 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Mayor Love called the Executive Session to order at 7:10 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby; and Administrator Jim Hurm B. Review Agenda . There were no changes to the agenda as presented. 2. INTERVIEWS FOR CITY ATTORNEY POSTION 7:10 p.m. 7:45 p.m. 8:25 p.m. John Dean, Ron Batty of Kennedy & Graven Thomas Radio of Hinshaw & Culbertson Tim Keane, of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Following the interviews and discussion, a consensus was reached that Tim Keane, of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. will be placed on the appointment resolution at the January 10 meeting for appointment as City Attorney. 3. ADJOURN . There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR :# 2B -/ I ; j \ CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM . DATE: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen, Acting City Administrator Larry Brown, Director ofPublic Works PY January 5, 2000 TO: FROM: RE: A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Change Order 1 for the Trunk Highway 7 Access Control Project This matter is a housekeeping item, in that the Trunk: Highway 7 Access Closure project is nearly complete. During construction of the project, poor subsurface soils were encountered. Attachment 1 is Change Order 1 in the amount of $3,900.00 for the furnishing and installation of granular material to replace the poor soils. If approved, the total contract amount would be revised from $197,707.50 to $201,607.50 . Staff is recommending approval of the resolution which approves Change Order 1 and revises the total contract amount. A resolution is attached for your consideration. ft ,,~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ~, " I MnIOOT TP-21839-02 (12-92) SHEET -L OF -L SHEETS State of Minnesota - Department of Transportation WORK ORDER Contractor Hardrives Inc. W.O.No. S.P. No. F.P. No. Contract No. 1 1004-25 N/A 79330 Address 14475 Quiram Drive Ro ers MN 55374 Job Location MN During the subgrade excavatio process, the Engineer has determined that the in place embankment material is unsuitable for construction of th roadway embankment As a result, the in place unsuitable material shall be replaced with select granular borrow mat rial and the unsuitable material shall be disposed of off-site. Payment for this work shall be ~ade on a negotiated unit price per metric ton of select granular borrow. The unit price . shall include the cost to dispos~'of unsuitable material off-site which is excavated in the subgrade. ITEM 2105.609 UNITS t QUANTITY 400 UNIT COST $9.75 AMOUNT $3.900.00 Select ranular Borrow Total Amount $3,900.00 100% State Funds Received by: Issued by: Hardrives, Inc. Contractor . By: ~. J 1 \ I~ Larry Brown. P.E. City Engineer BY:~L/,,~4.4,,",- ~ Date: 1/ ~1A, / . Date: Original to Contractor Copy to Engineer Attachment 1 \ CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 00- _ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #1 FOR CITY PROJECT 98-04, SP 1004-25 TRUNK mGHW A Y 7 ACCESS CONTROL PROJECT WHEREAS, by Resolution 99-084 the City Council accepted bids and awarded the contract for City Project 98-04, TH 7 Access Control Project to Hardrives, Inc.; and WHEREAS, poor subgrade soils were encountered on the project as documented by the City Engineer; and . WHEREAS, Hardrives Inc. was directed to replace said poor subgrade soils with select granular borrow material. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood City Council: 1. Change Order #1, as attached hereto as "Exhibit N' in the amount of $3,900.00 paid directly to Hardrives, Inc. for the furnishing and installation of select granular borrow material is hereby approved. 2. The total contract amount is amended to correspond with Change Order 1 from an original amount of $197,707.50 to a revised amount of $201,607.50. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood this 10th day of . January, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1 MnJOOT TP-21839-02 (12-92) SHEET...L OF ...L SHEETS State of Minnesota - Department of Transportation WORK ORDER Contractor Hardrives. Inc. W.O.No. S.P. No. F.P. No. Contract No. 1 1004-25 N/A 79330 Address 14475 Quiram Drive. Roaers. MN 55374 Job Location T.H. 7 Access Controllmorovement. Shorewood. MN In accordance with standard specifications 1103 and 1403 you are hereby authorized and instructed to do the work described herein. During the subgrade excavation process, the Engineer has determined that the inplace embankment material is unsuitable for construction of the roadway embankment As a result, the inplace unsuitable material shall be replaced with select granular borrow material and the unsuitable material shall be disposed of off-site. Payment for this work shall be made on a negotiated unit price per metric ton of select granular borrow. The unit price . shall include the cost to dispose of unsuitable material off-site which is excavated in the subgrade. ITEM 2105.609 ITEM NAME UNITS t QUANTITY I UNIT COST 400 I $9.75 Total Amount AMOUNT $3,900.00 $3,900.00 Select Granular Borrow 100% State Funds Received by: Issued by: . Hardrives. Inc. Contractor Larrv Brown. P.E. City Engineer By.ojUE~ ~ ~~ Date: II :/;., A? / By: ~~ J \ \ I~ l Cif Date: Original to Contractor Copy to Engineer Refer to Construction "Exhibit A" F:\W CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen. Acting City Administrator Lany Brown, Director of Public Works ,- January 3,2000 FROM: . DATE: RE: A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and Acting City Administrator to Enter Into an Agreement with Munitech, Inc. Attachment 1 is the proposal from Munitech, Inc. for continued operation of the municipal water system and wastewater system for the year 2000. Technically, Munitech's contract ended on December 31, 1999. . There has been much discussion over the past year that it is time to compute a cost comparison between providing contracted services with Munitech, Inc. versus bringing these services "in house." Due to the timing, staff is recommending that Munitech's proposal be approved for the year 2000. This will provide an opportunity to compile the cost comparison during the year. The proposal provided is for $7,100 per month total for maintaining the water and wastewater system. Currently, Munitech's fees are approximately $6,900 per month. The proposed increase was anticipated, and already accounted for in the 2000 year operating budget. Therefore, Staffis recommending approval of the resolution, which accepts Munitech's proposal for the continued operation and maintenance of the municipal water and wastewater systems for the year 2000. ft t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER sC- MUNITECH, INC. 2373 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MOUND, MN 55364.1634 Phone: 612/472.2718 November 15, 1999 Mr. James C. Hurm Shorewood City Administrator 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Jim, We have provided water and wastewater maintenance .services for the City of Shorewood since 1985. We have considered it a professional privilege to be in a position to provide these services. Our goal has always been to provide the most cost effective quality services possible, while developing and maintaining good relations with those we serve. Since our present contract expires at the end of this year, we're submitting a renewal proposal and request. During 1998, 3,746 hours and 19,565 miles were recorded to carry out our required job functions in Shorewood. In 1999 those numbers will be exceeded by a small amount, but the 1998 hours are being used as a basis for this request. . Our proposal is based on Munitech providing the following: -all liability, vehicle, and workers' compensation insurance, as well as medical insurance (including all other benefits) for our employees. -all our vehicles, fuel, small tools -all labor, including 24 hour per day, seven day per week on-call response service to resident inquiries and emergency related situations with the water/wastewater system. Munitech contract proposal renewal request is for $7100.00 per month for the year 2000 or, as we've done in the past, we're offering an option plan for a three year contract with the. following retainer prices: Year 2000 - $7050.00 per month Year 2001 - $7150.00 per month Year 2003 - $7250.00 per month . We look forward to continued service to you, Shorewood residents, staff, and City Council. Please call with any questions or comments. Since.r.~el -' L7 ~~ Bob Polston President, Munitech, Inc. C: Mr. Larry Brown, Engineer/Public Works Director UTILITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE · SERVICE FOR ALL MAKES OF METERS · SPECIALIST IN FLOW METER REBUILDING 1. 2. .... ;). 4. 5. 6. . 7. 8. 9. . MUNITECH 1998 OPERATING COST WORK SHEET LABOR Straight time - 2970 hours Checking lift stations and wells Preventive and corrective maintenance on lift stations and wells (chemical feed equipment, controls & equipment) Inspections of water and sewer services for new installation and for repair Collecting ofbact-t samples, fluoride samples and testing Fl content, preparing reports for the State Health Dept. - Fl., lead & copper, nitrates Answering customer inquiries and complaints Maintaining system records - daily pumping logs (wells and lift stations) Coordinating and flushing fire hydrants, and maintenance of hydrants. Repairing malfunctioning water meters. Reading water meters on a quarterly basis, including "final reads" as customers move. EMERGENCY ON CAT.T. SERVICES On call services - 312 hours 24 hour, 7 day per week on call, to handle well and lift station failures, answering customer inquiries and assist them with sewer back up problems, broken water services, meters, or other related questions. OVERTIME Responding to call outs - 464 hours MILEAGE Miles driven to complete job fimctions - 19,565 TOTALS: Hours Miles 3,746 19,565 CostlHour for vehicle and man-hours $21.93/hr. Shorewood Maintenance CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL PROVIDED BY MUNITECH, INC. FOR THE YEAR 2000 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has contracted with Munitech, Inc. since 1985 for the operation and maintence of the municpal water and wastewater system, and; WHEREAS, the Munitech, Inc. has provided the City of Shorewood with an updated proposal dated November 15, 1999 for services to be provided for the year 2000, attached hereto as "Exhibit A," and; WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has reviewed said proposal provided by Munitech, Inc. and rcommends approval of the proposal. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shorewood hereby accepts the proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A, dated November 15, 1999 from Munitech, Inc. for continued operation and maintence of the municapal water and wastwewater system. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this day of January 10, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR ,- . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSES FOR REFUSE COLLECTORS WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code Section 507.05 provides for the annual licensing of refuse collectors in the City; and WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant shall complete an application and fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed this application and fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a License for Refuse Collection. . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood as follows: That a License for Refuse Collection be issued for a term of one year, from January 1,2000 to December 31, 2000, to the following applicants: Permit # 00-019 Firm Name Haugens Haulers Address 7386 31 sl S1. SE Buffalo, MN 55313 00-020 Randy's Sanitation 4351 U.S. Highway 12 SE Delano, NlN 55328 00-021 Waconia Rolloff Service, Inc. P.O. Box 196 Waconia, MN 55387 . 00-022 Ray Anderson & Sons Co.'s, Inc. 930 Duluth Street S1. Paul, MN 55106 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of January, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR #3b t GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES CONTRACT PART I - AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 5th day of January, 2000, by and between the City of Shorewood, Minnesota (the "City"), and LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. (the "Attorney"). STATEMENT OF FACTS The City has solicited proposals, conducted a series of interviews, and engaged in deliberations with respect to the selection of an attorney to serve as the City Attorney. The City has determined to select Timothy 1. Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., whom . desires to serve the City in that capacity. . AGREEMENT 1.) Scope of Services. The Attorney shall act as counsel for the City and shall perform all civil legal services required, and shall do so in a satisfactory and proper manner, as determined by the City. The services provided under this Contract shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) Act as General Counsel to the City, providing it with general legal advice, including attendance at regular City Council meetings, advising it concerning the legality of the exercise of its powers and responsibilities; advising it concerning all of its contracts, including the rendering of all necessary legal opinions, implementation and financing of capital improvement projects; reviewing, analyzing and reporting on laws, regulations, and ordinances relevant to the conduct of the City's affairs; review of ordinances and resolutions; legal advice to the City Administrator and department heads, and any and all general civil legal services. (b) Negotiate acquisition of or eminent domain proceedings regarding private property; the furnishing of title information; the preparation of land for development or redevelopment by means of street vacation, dedication, platting and replatting, comments on its activities or funding; or other legal services not provided for in Paragraph 1 (a) herein. (c) Prosecution of ordinance violations within the City; (d) Initiation or defense of civil claims involving the City; (e) Service as Bond Counsel, as and to the extent requested by the City, and provide advice with respect to all matters of government assistance and tax exempt finance; #3E. It (f) Advice and counsel with respect to employment and personnel matters; (g) Any and all other matters for which the City desires legal counsel and services. 2.) Data to be Furnished to Attorney - The City shall furnish any necessary data which is available from its files. 3.) Personnel. (a) The Attorney represents that it has, or will secure at its own expenses, all personnel required in performing the services under this Contract. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City. (b) All of the required services will be performed by the Attorney and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or permitted under State and F ederallaw to perform such services. (c) None of the work or services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. . 4.) Time of Performance - The services of the Attorney are to commence upon the execution of this Contract and shall continue unless terminated as herein provided. 5.) Compensation. (a) Monthly Retainer. The Firm will provide services to include attendance at regular City Council meetings and bi-weekly staff meetings at City Hall, meetings with department heads, day-to-day requests for advice from City staff with respect to zoning, contract matters, drafting agreements or easements, and other issues on which routine legal advice is sought. The monthly retainer for the term of this agreement will be $1,750.00 per month. . (b) Services not chargeable to Third Parties or Proiect Financing. The Attorney, in consideration for the services to be performed pursuant to Paragraph 1 that are not included in the monthly retainer, shall be paid an hourly rate of compensation which shaH vary depending upon the personnel of the Attorney performing the services, and shall be in accordance with the Shorewood Rate depicted on the attached Schedule A for a period of no less than one (1) year. ( c) Services Billed to Others. Legal services rendered on behalf of the City but for the benefit of a specific project or party which will ultimately be responsible for the costs would be billed at Standard Rates as set forth in Schedule A. These would be services rendered in connection with specific development proposals where the City bills back its costs to the developers; services rendered with respect to public improvement projects or tax increment projects for which the City pays for the costs out of a bond issue. 2. f"' 6.) Reimbursement of Expenses - The City shall reimburse the Attorney for expenses and disbursements in connection with legal matters handled by it, such as notary fees, court costs, witness fees, recording fees, reproduction costs, facsimile transmissions, similar matters, etc., but not including its general office or overhead expense, all generally in accordance with the attached Schedule B. Reimbursement shall be made from time to time upon submission of appropriate InVOIces. 7.) Method of Payment - Invoices shall be submitted and payment shall be made monthly. Time entries by the Attorney shall be in sufficient detail so that services are readily discernible, and shall be internally recorded in tenth of an hour increments. Invoices shall be in a format adequate for the City to allocate expenses among general services, prosecutions, capital improvements, and litigation. 8.) Terms and Conditions - This Agreement is subject to, and includes the provisions incorporated herein, as Part II, Terms and Conditions. . 9.) Other Provisions - Meeting between the Attorney's representatives and members of the staff of the City shall be held periodically in order to better coordinate and schedule the work and services to be performed. PART II - TERMS AND CONDITIONS . 1.) Termination of Contract for Cause. If the Attorney fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Contract, or if the Attorney shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Contract, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to the Attorney of such termination and specify the effective date thereof, at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data studies and reports prepared by the Attorney under this Contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property and the Attorney shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and be reimbursed for its costs. 2.) Termination at Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Contract without cause any time by a thirty (30) day notice in writing from the City to the Attorney. If the Contract is terminated by the City as provided herein, the Attorney will be paid for services actually performed up to the effective date of termination and be reimbursed for its costs. 3.) Changes. - The City may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the services of the Attorney to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Attorney's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Attorney, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract. 4.) Eaual Emplovment Opportunity - During the performance of this Contract the Attorney agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. 3. "l 5.) Compliance with Laws. The Attorney shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the State and Federal governments. 6.) Assignability - The Attorney shall not assign any interest in this Contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation) without the prior written approval of the City. 7.) Interest of Members of City - No member of the governing body of the City, and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the carrying out of the services to which this Contract pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. 8.) Findings Confidential - All of the reports, information, data, etc..., prepared or assembled by the Attorney under this contract are confidential and the Attorney agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Attorney have executed this Agreement as of the . date first above written. CITY OF SHOREWOOD By: Mayor By: City Administrator LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. . By: 4. ,. t. SCHEDULE A Hourly Rates: Shorewood Rates Standard Rates T. Keane $l25.00 $215.00 G. Van Cleve $150.00 $220.00 L. Martin $135.00 $210.00 W. Griffith $110.00 $210.00 S. Wahlgren $100.00 $150.00 . J. Susag $110.00 $150.00 J. TeSlaa, Paralegal $55.00 $100.00 . 5. 0458684.01 " ... SCHEDULE B REIMBURSABLE COSTS INCURRED ON BEHALF OF CLIENT Local Travel $0.30 per mile Messenger Services (In-House) $18.00 round trip to Shorewood (Outside) $26.00 round trip to Shorewood F acsirnile Charges $1.00 per page, plus cost for long distance phone call, if long distance (only charged for fax LHDL would send, not incoming). Charges limited to those services described in Section 5(b) of Contract. Photocopying $0.20 per page Long Distance Phone Charges $ phone company rate Filing Fees - District Court $132.00 plus $30.00 if requesting Jury Process Services $30.00-75.00 (approxilnate, depends on miles, location, how many trips to serve individual) Court Reporters $200.00 one-half day $400.00-$600.00 full day Westlaw (Computer Research) $75.00 per hour . . 6. .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. D' ~ll' r:-r ,~;~.o1 ~' - '_ . .J~'; .:' . t . · ".w :1 AN ORDINANCE TITLED "LICENSE, PERMIT, SERVICE CHARGES AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1301.02 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is hereby repealed and replaced with the following: 1301.02: ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES AND CHARGES: Fees and charges by the City are hereby established as set forth in Schedule A. Each section of the City Code which contains any such fee or charge is hereby amended to reflect the amount set forth in Schedule A. If this Title 1300 does not establish a fee or charge, it shall remain as stated in other sections of the City Code. . . I. TYPE OF CHARGEIFEE Police Alarm Permits Fire Alarm Permits Recreational Fire Permit Open Burning Permit Boat Docks & Boat Storage Facility License Intoxicating Liquor License Wine License - On-Sale Intoxicating Malt LiquorI Wine License - On-Sale Liquor Special Club License Special Sunday License 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - On-sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Liquor License - Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Temporary License I. TYPE OF CHARGE/FEE Tobacco Retailer License Administrative Fines: Licensees in Violation Other Individuals in Violation SCHEDULE A CITY CODE REFERENCE 601.06.1 601.06.1 501.03 501.03 304.05 403.06.1 403.06.1 403.06.1 403.06.1 403.06.1 402.06.2 402.06.2 402.06.2 CITY CODE REFERENCE 302 CHARGE/FEE $ 100.00 3rd false alarm & thereafter 200.00 2nd false alarm & thereafter No Charge 100.00 per site 35.00 7,500.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 250.00 200.00 300.00 50.00 25.00 CHARGElFEE $250.00/premise $75.00lfirst offense 200.00/second offense in 24 month period 250.00/thereafter within 24 month period 50.00 per offense City of Shorewood 01~ ~F .. Adult Use License 309 Investigative Fee Adult Use Facility License 500.00 1,675.00 + $50/video booth or stall Dog Licenses 701.03.2 702.04 701.08.4 5.00 1.00 late fee 25.00/initiallicense 1O.00/renewallicense 25.00 25.00 1st offense of year 50.00 thereafter 150.00~ 100.00 Biennial 25.00 Temporary 35.00 1,000.00 Bond 1.50/molhousehold 150.00 100.00 65.00/qtr/residential 43.33/qtr/residentiallow income 32.50/qtr/residential seasonal 77.90/qtr, + $2.75/ea 1,000 gallons in excess of 28,500 gallons per qtr/commercial l00.00/mo 1,000.00 50.00 + 25.001truck 30.00 . Kennel License 701.04.2 Sanitary Sewer Surcharge Local Sewer A vail. Charge Refuse Hauler License Tree Trimmers License Water Connection Permit Inside Outside Water Meter - 3/4" 3/4" Hom 1" Meter I" Hom 1 1/2" Meter (wlflanges) 903.03.lb(2) 2" Meter (wlflanges) 903.03.lb(2) I" Pressure Reducing Valve I 1/2" Pressure Reducing Valve 2" Pressure Reducing Valve Late Meter Reading Fee 903.08.6 Meter Test 903.08.4 Horse Permit Animal Impound Fees Street Excavation Permit Gambling License Ifldi'{idual Sewage DisJlosal System Contractor License Residential Recycling Fee Sewer Connection Permit Sewer Service 0100H99 901.01.2b 301.06.2 301.06.1 506.05.5 904.07.1 904.15.la 904.09.5 904.18.3 507.05.4 305.01 903.03.la 903.03.1b(2) 50.00~ 60.00 80.00 20.00 160.00 40.00 365.00 475.00 75.00 180.00 190.00 5.00 50.00 . City of Shorewood Water Supply - Research of Properties Special Assessment Search Mailed Minutes (nonresident) CITY CODE REFERENCE CHARGE~EE 903.09.1a 22.50/qtrminimum, +- $1.45/1,000 gallons in excess of 10,000 gallons/qtr Water Service - Low Income 903.09.1a(l) 15.oo/qtr minimum Water Turn-on & Shut-off Fee 903.04 50.00 ~ Base Water Special Assessment (R) 903.18.03 Water Trunk Charge (T) 903.18.06 10,000.00 Water Connection Fee 903.03.3 . Connection fee shall be the same as the amount specified in Section 903.18, subd.6.a. less any amounts previously paid for trunk water improvements as special assessments or for trunk charges at the time of subdivision of land pursuant to Section 903.18, Subd.6.a. I 75.00 15.00 75.00 annual .25/page/indi vidual 35.00 annual .25/page/indi vidual .25/page/single side 8.5xl1" .50/page/single side anything larger I. TYPE OF CHARGE~EE Water Service 5,000.00 . Mailed Agendas Copies . Aerial T opographyPl1otography: Mylar Copy Electronic Recycling Containers City Code Book CD Rom (pC or Mac Format) Updates City Zoning Code Election Filing Fee Spring Clean-up Fees 507.09.1 507.09.2 l6.00/acre + 5.oo/mylar 50.oo/megabyte of data 8.00 after 1st container 75.00 25.00 25.oo/yr 20.00 2.00 Up to 10.00 7.00 appliances* 17.00 large furniture* 3.00 tires w/o rims* 6.00 tires w/ rims* 12.00 truck tires w/o rims* 16.00 air conditioners* * Or as determined based upon actual cost of disposal Transient Business, Peddling or Soliciting 308.08 Storm Water Drainage Utility Residential Equivalent Factor Basic System Rate 905.03 Tri-Annual Rental Housing License Fee, per Unit 1004.03(3) (includes up to 3 inspection/unit) Additional Inspections as Necessary 1004.03(3) 50.oo/applicant 3.75/qtr City of Shorewood OIOOH:99 I 35.00 20.00/inspection I. TYPE OF CHARGE~EE Park & Recreation Use Fees Skating Rinks (per rink) Unlighted Lighted Tournaments SoccerlFootbaHlBasebaH/Softball Fields (per field) Resident Base Fee Soccer/Football/Baseball/Softball Fields (ver field) Unlighted $ 20.00/day Lighted 30.00/day Tournament 50.00/day Multi-Use Buildings 100.00 Damage Deposit 50.00 Manor/Badger/Cathcart/Silverwood25.00 Freeman 50.00 Picnic Pavilions Manor/Badger/Cathcart Freeman II. TYPE OF CHARGE/FEE CITY CODE REFERENCE 902.06.3 25.00 CITY CODE REFERENCE CHARGE~EE 1O.00/hour 15.00/hour 30.00/day + attendant salary Nonresident Base Fee 60.00/day 90.00/day 150.00/day 100.00 150.00 75.00 150.00 50.00 . CHARGE~EE Zoning! Amendments Conditional Use Permit Variances & Appeals Variances & Appeals Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Development Stage Plan Final Plan Site Plan Review/Certificate Subdivision (Metes & Bounds- 3 lots or less) Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) Subdivision (Final Plat) 1201.04.1a 1201.04.la 1201.05.3a 1201.05.3a 1201.05.3a 1201.25.6b(2)(b) 1201.07.2 1202.03.1a(2) 1202.03.1a(2) 1202.03.1a(2) Park Dedication 1202.07 (cash in lieu of land) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Extension of Deadline for Recording Resolutions $ 450.00 200.00 (residential) 300.00 + 100.00 escrow (nonresidential) 150.00 + 150.00 escrow (residential) 200.00 + 150.00 escrow (nonresidential) 300.00 + 100.00 escrow 300.00 + 100.00 escrow 300.00 + 100.00 escrow 150.00 250.00 + 100.00 escrow . 250.00 + 100.00 escrow +25/10t 500.00 + 200.00 escrow +25/10t 1,500.00/unit 200.00 Preapplication 800.00 Formal application 50% of Original Application Fee NOTE: Base fees are nonrefundable. Escrow deposits are to cover consulting engineer and attorney expenses. Applicants are informed that any City expenses not covered by these fees will be billed to them. Unused escrow fees will be returned to applicant upon written request. OIO()f399 City of Shorewood ~ III. TYPE OF CITY CODE CHARGE/FEE REFERENCE CHARGEIFEE Building Permit 1001.03 Per +9941997 UBC TABLE I-A (S.Re.) Residential Roofing Permit S.B.C. 50.00 Siding Permit S.B.C. 50.00 House Moving Permit 1002.02.4a Per~ 1997 UBCTABLE I-A + 200.00 e crow Mechanical Permit S.B.C. 2% value of work, 20.00 minimum Plumbing Permit S.B.e. 7.00/fixture, 20.00 minimum Automatic Sprinkling System Permit S.B.C. 20.00 Removal or Abandonment. U.F.C. 35.00 1st tank + $20 each Underground Tanks additional Demolition Permit S.B.C. 50.00* Sign Permit Application Fee 1201.03.1 If 20.00 Approved Sign Permit Fee Per~1997 UBCTABLE I-A Fence Permit 1201.03.2f 20.00 GradinglFilling Permit S.B.C. Per S.RC.1997 UBC TABLE A-33-A & A-3tB . Home Occupation Permit 1201.03.12c 20.00 (limited) 200.00 (special) Irrigation System Permit 901.02.2d 20.00 R.O.W. Encroachment Permit 901.02.2b 40;0~ * Fee is waived when done in conjunction with a building permit or when burned by Fire Department. Section 2. This ordinance is effective the date following its publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this 13th day of December, 1999; . WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: JA:MES c. HURM, CITY fAD1VIL'ilSTRA.. TOR BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR City of Shorewood OlO0-m9 I . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK AND APPROVING APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CITY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK WHEREAS, City Administrator/Clerk. James C. Hurm (Hurm), has served as City Administrator/Clerk since April 1992; and WHEREAS, on December 17. 1999, Hurm submitted his resignation to the City Council of the City of Shorewood effective December 31, 1999; and WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted the resignation and desires to fill the position of City Administrator/Clerk on an interim basis. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of Shorewood does hereby appoint Planning Director Bradley J. Nielsen as interim City Administrator/Clerk until such time as a permanent City Administrator/Clerk has been appointed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED Bradley J. Nielsen shall continue to discharge the responsibilities of the office of Planning. Director and shall further be charged with all the duties and responsibilities of the City Administrator/Clerk as set forth in the City Code of the City of Shorewood and Minnesota Stat. Chapter 412. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this _ day of January, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRADLEY J. NIELSEN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR *So , . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1999 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 PM. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING D RJ.\FT . Co-chair Dallman called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Co-chairs Dallman and Arnst; Commissioner Puzak. (Commissioner Themig arrived at 8: 12 p.m.); City Administrator Jim Hurm; City Engineer Larry Brown. Also Present: Park Planner Mark Koegler Absent: Commissioner Berndt, Councilmember Scott Zerby. B. Review Agenda There were no changes to the agenda. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of November 9, 1999 Due to lack of a quorum, approval of the Minutes was delayed until the expected arrival of Commissioner Themig. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none. 4. DISCUSS FACILITATOR I SET DATE FOR JOINT MEETING WITH SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS Administrator Hurm provided background information on the plan to meet with Park Planner, Mark Koegler. The Commission began discussion of Mr. Koegler's role as facilitator (rather than mediator) and what is hoped to be accomplished through the process. .SA , Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 2 Mr. Koegler stated that he has reviewed the background material and agrees that the process needs a facilitator and that the presentation must be phrased in a positive way. He believes that if the situation is explained in a rational manner to rational people they can come to an agreement and have support. He asked for feedback from the Commission and if they were of one mindset on the best process to use. He also asked if there were certain topics to avoid and how to structure the meeting. Commissioner Puzak said he is not sure that the problem is completely understood yet. He questioned whether the base level facility the City provides is the right level for the tax payers. Administrator Hurm pointed out that surveys taken over recent years have indicated that people are generally pleased with park facilities in Shorewood. He said the Commission is doing what they should be and he is not sure how they would get more information from citizens than they already have. Puzak raised the question of whether it is right to ask other organizations to follow the model of Little League and provide for themselves. Co-chair Arnst said this is the first . time the Commission has had these actual numbers to work with. Presenting that information may open their eyes a bit. For example, when you see that only 30% of soccer players live in Shorewood, that goes against the argument that Shorewood should foot the bill. Puzak said he is supportive of the plan, but not sure yet if we know enough or figured out all of our options. His recommendation is to publish the data provided by staff and see if there is a way to then make people aware of the need. Koegler suggested if the Commission wants to take community input, they need to take it separately from the joint meeting. Any further investigation should be done ahead of time. In any case, the Park Commission must be united. Puzak said he can refer to past surveys for answers to some of his questions. He will . review that and will probably get a sense of what he feels is missing. Co-chair Dallman asked if the information should be sent out with the meeting invitation for the sports representatives to preview. Koegler suggested that it may be better to present information to the group as a whole that night. The data will take a bit of explanation, and it is best to first give people some background with the presentation of facts and figures. Hurm suggested telling them we will try to limit the length of the meeting. Arnst suggested that the invitation be directed toward the organizations' leaders and decision makers. Puzak added that those who attend need to be equipped to return to their boards and clearly present the information. There was discussion about whether to have some sort of agreement prepared and what to ask of each group. Puzak suggested they provide options for groups to consider and then return at a second meeting with their thoughts on how they can participate. Some ideas for Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 3 a fee structure were mentioned. Co-chair Arnst suggested that Mr. Koegler present the information without a specific request for funds and then ask the representatives to go to their own boards and return to report what they are able to offer. Co-chair Dallman recommended to just present a suggested amount and see what they come back with. One of the concepts to present is for the organization to offer to give up some field space if they are unable to make a financial offer. Mr. Koegler cautioned to tread carefully because that could sound like a threat rather than an offer. Hurm recommended that idea be saved until a second meeting to discuss in a negotiation phase. Hurm also asked how to handle any "laundry" that may surface. Koegler said that will take some thought. Hurm suggested putting an emphasis on looking to the future and starting with a clean slate. . Co-chair Dallman said the Park Commission should present the numbers and show solidarity. Commissioner Puzak added that Mr. Koegler should not be expected to answer questions, but be there as a neutral facilitator. There was further discussion about fielding questions of "dirty laundry" and when to answer questions or pass them on to the Commissioners. Co.-chair Arnst suggested that rules for the meeting be presented at the start in order to set perimeters. Park Planner Koegler recommended that the letters of invitation be sent from the Park Commission. Hurm asked about follow-up phone calls and suggested that an invitation from the Mayor may be more effective. Koegler agreed that the letter and follow-up phone call would be important. He suggested that a Chair of the Park Commission make the calls. Arnst agreed. . It was decided to hold the joint meeting on Monday, January 31, 2000 from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.. The next regular meeting of the Park Commission will be on Tuesday, January 11, 2000. Koegler is unable to attend the meeting on the 11 th, but will send thoughts for the Commission to consider for fine tuning. 8:12 p.m. - Mark Koegler left. Commissioner Mark Themig arrived. There was a two minute break. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Revisited) A. Park Commission Meeting Minutes of November 9, 1999 Arnst moved, Themig seconded to approve the Minutes as submitted. Motion passed 4/0. Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 4 s. CONCESSION STAND - MULTI PURPOSE BUILDING A. Review Design Plans for Kitchen Layout Engineer Larry Brown presented current plans for the multi-purpose building, noting that the most striking change is the addition of glass block. He explained the practical and esthetic reasons around the change as recommended by the architect. The interior of the building has also been reviewed for storage space, and the pavilion area as well, to make sure we're getting the best use of our dollars. Of particular concern is the kitchen. If there are family reunions it seems best to use double doors for allowing light in and getting equipment in and out. The side doors will then be limited to singles. Brown also explained that with requirements regarding handicap access, they have tried to work around the location of the drinking fountain. A secured box in the pavilion area with water and electricity availability to the outside is also included in the plan. The idea of . lighting the outside pavilion has not been discussed. Commissioner Themig questioned the placement of glass block above the windows (as shown in the north elevation), from a design standpoint. He noted that Ramsey County parks have had good luck with glass block in a similar building, however, in a newer building, where glass is placed at a lower level, there has been vandalism and broken glass. Co-chair Dallman said that the idea of glass block was to provide natural lighting in the bathroom areas. Maybe glass block is not needed in other areas, especially if the cost is higher. Brown explained that glass block in the main area was to provide lighting from the north side. Co-chair Arnst said the placement of glass block for the ends of the building looks fine, but suggested eliminating the block above doors and windows on the north and south . elevations. Brown suggested perhaps lowering the glass block to be at the same height as the doors and windows. After a few other suggestions were made, it was agreed to defer the decision back to Brown and the architect. Brown asked for clarification that the Commissioners agree with the current design for glass block on the ends, and if they only want adjustments for the design on the sides of the building. Commissioner Puzak agreed, adding that the south elevation also fine, it's just the north side that is questionable. Brown said he is not sure about the kitchen facilities, since it is depending upon the concessionaire who manages the facility. His opinion is to provide the basics, (shelf, counter, sink) because beyond that, whatever we provide probably won't be right. Puzak said to make sure there is enough plumbing and power and drainage, adding that anything imbedded in walls and concrete should be well provided. . . Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 5 Arnst asked if there will be wiring to add outdoor lights for future skating. Brown said they will provide conduits to allow controls, but skating is another issue. Themig added a few comments from his previous experience with park shelters. He strongly recommended trench drains along an outside wall of each bathroom, rather than center floor drains because maintenance is much easier. Brown said his concern is overflow running across the floor area. Themig explained that the contractors can get a slope better with trench drains, plus it avoids flooding the whole room. Maintenance people love it and it doesn't increase construction cost considerably. Themig's other comment is that venting in bathrooms especially has been a problem in past designs. He suggested they install louver vents at the floor level and an exhaust fan to dry the floor. This method has been very helpful. Themig also offered to look into steel shutters for window exteriors, which has been a good anti-vandalism measure in parks. Arnst asked about the idea of including a fireplace. Brown said that we have attacked this project from bottom up and are trying to get down to within budget. A fireplace would add considerably to the cost. He then referred to the December 14, 1999 memorandum in which he outlined a tentative time schedule for design and bidding. According to the schedule, we would be hitting an ideal bidding window. Brown will bring an update back to the Park Commission for review and comment at a later time. B. Discuss Kitchen Layout Brown said that in regard to the kitchen layout, it has been his opinion to leave the area open. Beyond that, he is not sure what else needs to be determined at this time. Puzak raised the question of power for immediate, as well as future needs. He recommended a minimum of 200 AMP service. Brown explained that there is a transformer there now, but he is not sure what that's capable of. This has to be reviewed along with the plan for a sanitary sewer line. Brown then stated that one of the things being considered is the plan for the sanitary sewer system. It was originally going to come off of Eureka Road and go to the picnic shelter around the parking lot. One of the things that has come up is the watermain for the Shorewood Ponds site. The Eureka Road neighborhood is not interested in seeing watermain go down their street. However one issue of the Fire Department is to ask the City to bring a watermain through Freeman Park. They could then utilize fire hydrants on Eureka Road with minimal tree loss. The reroute of electricity can be reviewed at that time. Co-chair Arnst asked about a past recommendation to link the [then future] Shorewood Ponds development to the LRT trail with a new walking trail. Brown said yes, that has been considered and it works well, in that builders are out there. However, it would go in after the fact. Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 6 6. REPORTS A. Report on Right of Way Research for Smithtown West Brown reported that the City Attorney and assistant have researched and provided an Owners and Encumbrances Report on properties along Smithtown Road. They found that the City does not own right of way along Smithtown, other than where it has been platted. Since then, the City has met an elderly gentleman at the Minnesota Department of Transportation who knew some history. In searching archives, they have found a document showing that Smithtown is a Four Rod Statutory Roadway, (which would be a 66 foot right of way). It was apparently done in 1929. The attorney is checking whether that agrees with his data. Brown speculated that the attorney will likely say the research stands and the City will have to compensate people if we want to use the land. Arnst asked if this is true for a majority of the properties along Smithtown. Brown said yes, if you want to do improvements, with the exception of areas that have been platted. He estimated that 40% are dedicated rights of way, and those are intermittent. The cost would be substantial to obtain needed rights of way. This information will be put in map form to present to the City Council and the Park Commission. . Puzak asked if this is true along both the west and east portions of Smithtown. Brown said it affects all of it. When asked if there would be issues with the west end, Brown said most certainly there would be. Arnst asked if MSA funds could be used for right of way acquisition, as that is the only way the City would be in a position to compensate for land purchase. Brown clarified that when talking about obtaining right of way, it would be to the outside of a trail from the edge of the pavement. There would be no need to compensate for already used area. Brown agreed that without using State Aid dollars on Smithtown, the possibility of a trail looks pretty bleak. Themig said the Commission should acknowledge there is demand for a trail, but until there is a major road improvement with MSA funding, it can't be done. Brown said that is . bookmarked for the year 2001. Puzak thanked Brown for an answer to a question that was asked a long time ago. This is one of the fundamental facts needed and the fact is we don't have room to work with. Dallman asked if 2001 is when the Commission would start inquiring again. Brown said he foresees a year's worth of right of way acquisition and another year for projects. Arnst asked if MSA is a given for Smithtown Road. Brown said no, but it is a politically charged issue. Curb and gutter is the primary concern. One compromise is to try to get the State to approve a full asphalt curb. It is not the most durable, but more palatable to residents who prefer the rural feel. Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 7 Themig asked when the interpretation will come back from the attorney. Brown said it would be around two weeks. He will have an update at the next meeting. Hurm left the meeting. (8:55 p.m.) Brown asked to report on an item which is not on the agenda. He handed out copies of the latest plans for the Vine Hill I Covington trail and said they are very close to the final design. Revisions per a recent Park Commission meeting have been incorporated into this plan. Brown presented a tentative schedule, adding that he is thinking of a public information meeting for the beginning of February. . Arnst referred back to the Smithtown issue, saying that she recommends to present the new MSA information as soon as possible in order to avoid misinformation and exaggeration. Brown said the State is fortunately starting to bend a bit on MSA requirements for low speed rural sections. However, people may have to balance the need to use MSA funds if they want a trail. Dallman asked Brown about grants being applied toward the Freeman building. Brown said Administrator Hurm could probably answer that. Themig said there is an outdoor recreation grant program of $8 million which may apply. It is through the DNR and requires a letter of interest by the end of January. Brown will look into that and check with Hurm. Themig said the other grant is a local trail connections grant, but it sounds like that's out for now. B. Review Vending Machines It was agreed that this does not look like a good option at this time. Co-chair Dallman suggested that they could perhaps look at the idea of pop machines for each of the two warming houses for the time being. . C. Review Recycling Sc~narios Tabled until January due to the absence of Commissioner Berndt. D. Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association - Consider Membership Commissioner Themig said that he is on the Board of Directors for the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association and explained the benefits of membership, which costs $220 per year. The Association keeps updates on grant program announcements and provides a membership directory, which is beneficial for the City to be a part of. Also they have become more of an advocate for parks and serve as an outside expert. Dallman asked if the City would be a member or the Park Commission would hold the membership. Themig said the City would be the member and all Park Commissioners Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 8 would receive the newsletters. Arnst agreed that the Commission should be networking more with the park community and said she liked the idea. Puzak moved that the City join the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association. Arnst seconded. Dallman asked if this would go to Council for approval. It was agreed that this would be brought to the Council in the next report from the Park Commission. (Puzak is the December liaison and Themig is the January liaison to the City Council.) Following discussion, the motion passed 4/0. E. Report on Park Foundation Meetings of November 11 and December 9 Dallman reported that the Foundation has reviewed possible brochures for distributing to prospective donators. They have worked out a plan and will qave them printed. At the . December meeting there was no quorum, however two financial advisers were there and showed how to approach prospective donators. Arnst recommended they shop around for printing costs at various printers. Dallman said that at the sports organizations have not attended the last two meetings. Arnst suggested that it would be good to come up with a schedule for the next 6 months as a way of giving direction. Themig asked if they anticipate the sports organizations will want to be involved. Dallman said that some sports representatives have continued to participate. F. Update on Skate Park Puzak reported that the committee has not had a meeting since his last report. They do have a second design on paper and have identified components that could be subtracted if the fund raising doesn't reach $28,000. Their work is done until fundraising is more firm . and will then fine tune the design to match funds. Arnst reported that Mayor Love has talked with the Rotary and they will contribute if he returns with a more detailed presentation, which he plans to do. Puzak added that they haven ~t really heard any showstoppers yet. All potential donors appear willing to contribute. They have estimated approximately $10,000 will come from the public sector. Themig suggested they pursue a grant program for the skate park, too. Puzak said this is a great site and we can do a lot more. Themig added that he thinks this project has some merit for a grant, but they need to send an application request form. Arnst suggested a newsletter article to report on the progress with a skate park. Puzak said he would rather express the continuing need rather than progress, but it is always a good idea to communicate. Dallman strongly suggested a letter go to the Tonka Men's Club. ~ Park Commission December 14, 1999 -Page 9 G. Review of Potential DNR Grants Themig said the only question at this point is if we want to look at a different trail segment, since the Smithtown idea is on hold. Puzak recommended waiting for the official legal opinion on rights of way. 7. SMITHTOWN WEST -DEVELOP TIME LINES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS, ETC. This item has been covered and is on hold until the final report form Engineer Brown. 8. SCHEDULE DATE AND NOTIFICATION PROCESS FOR WINTER TRAIL WALK . The Commission had intended to walk the plowed LRT trail, however, due to lack of snow, this item was tabled until the January meeting. 9. OLD BUSINESS Commissioner Dallman asked if the easement request has been sent to the Planning Commission for the ball field at Freeman Park. Brown will check and report at the January 11 Park Commission meeting. 10. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 11. ADJOURNMENT . Arnst moved, Puzak seconded to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 4/0. The meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Connie Bastyr Recording Secretary ~ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us.cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEJ\'IORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DA TE: 6 January 2000 RE: Comprehensive Plan - Proposed Revision to Trail Section and Map FILE NO. Comp Plan - Transportation Attached is a draft of a proposed revision to the Trails section of the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The text change, shown in italics, is relatively brief. Hopefully it captures the spirit of the Council's direction to staff. The Trail Concept Plan is being revised to eliminate the "priority" designation from any segment of the map. Changes will also be made to the map indicating the status of various segments of trail that have already been studied. For example, portions of the trail will be identified as having been reviewed - study further, or reviewed - no priority. We will attempt to have the map sent out under separate cover on Friday. However, it may end up distributed at the meeting. If you have any questions on this item, please call me prior to Monday night's meeting. n ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER #1,,4. In 1998, after a series of community meetings and a survey of Shorewood residents, the Park Commission developed a planning process that places an emphasis on early and continuing neighborhood involvement in the establishment of an overall network of trails- within the community. The Trail Concept Plan, shown on page TR-31, identifies a potential system of trails within Shorewood that concentrates-on the connection of neighborhoods to one another and to various points of interest within the community. The trail planning process continues with the following steps: 1. PeriOOically the Park Commission identifies potential segments of trails to be considered in the coming years. 2. Trail walks, including area residents, are scheduled to identify issues specific to various segments of trails. 3. . 4. 5. Trail segments are incorporated into the City's Capitallmprovement Program. Meetings are conducted with affected neighborhoods to determine the best trail design for the various segments of trails. Trail segments are constructed based upon the availability of funding. It should be noted that not all trail segments will be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program. Due to limited funding resources, trails will be constructed in areas where resident demand ~highest. as opposed-to. areas where. it is demonstrated that resident desi1"e for trails is law. It is-recommended-that the T-rail Concept Plan, as-may be-amended, be consulted for all development proposals and street construction projects. Where trails are designated on or adjacent to roadways, right-of-way should be required. as. part of the subdivision approval process. Construction of trails on or along roadways should be incorporated into street improvement planning. . Although the right-of-way currently owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (BCRRA) has been identified for future light rail transit, it has become an important recreational feature in the South Lake Area. The- City should be proactive to ensure- that the right-of-way remains open for recreational use if light rail transit does not materialize. . Snowmobiles Snowmobiles-have- been a continued source-of controversy in recent years, despite increased efforts to enforce City codes regulating their use. Private. property trespass and damage, have been raised as- issues relative to snowmobiling. Shorewood has. adopted rules intended to address issues of compatibility between snowmobiles, pedestrians and motor vehicles. These rules will be periodically monitored to evaluate- their effectiveness. Airports There are no existing or proposed airports,.. search. areaS-or other facilities located in the ShorewoocLarea. Seaplane anduitra.-light operations are; however, allowed on the surface'Water RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2000 FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1981, in compliance with the Mandatory Land Planning Act; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan was updated in 1995, the Planning Commission has again undertaken a complete update of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS; the Comprehensive Plan 2000 was presented on an informal, informational basis to neighborhood groups and property owners in three open house meetings in the Shorewood City Hall from 31 August 1999 through 8 September; and WHEREAS, a special edition of the Shorewood newsletter, with an insert devoted entirely to the Comprehensive Plan Update was published in August 1999 and sent to all Shorewood residents; and . WHEREAS, after legal notice was published in the official City newspaper, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on 21 September 1999, to present the Comprehensive Plan 2000 to the public; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a separate public hearing on 7 December 1999 to consider the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting on 7 December 1999, recommended that the City Council adopt the Comprehensive Plan 2000 on an interim basis, pending review and comment by the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council after long and careful study of the Comprehensive Plan 2000, finds that it is in the City's best interest to approve the Comprehensive Plan 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Shorewood City Council: . 1. The Comprehensive Plan 2000, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein, is established as the official development guide of the City of Shorewood on an interim basis pending review and comment by other governmental agencies as required by law. 2. Upon completion of the governmental agency reviews, the Comprehensive Plan 2000 may be modified as determined necessary by the City Council and shall be adopted accordingly. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of January, 2000. Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: Bradley J. Nielsen, Acting City Administrator/Clerk CITY OF SHOREWOOD Position: Planning AssistantIW eb Developer Objective and Scope: Assists Planning Director in the administration of the Comprehensive Plan and administration and enforcement of the City Zoning Ordinance and building codes. Maintain records of building permits, related reports, and planning project accounting. Performs clerical functions as directed by the Planning Director. In addition to the objective and scope outlined in the Planning Assistant job description, the Web Developer description serves to incorporate design, administration and maintenance of the City's web site. . Relationship: Reports to: Planning Director Specific Responsibiltiies: A. Planning 1. Provide information, explanations and assistance concerning City planning procedures and zoning regulations and policies to residents, businesses, developers, and others involved in the land development process, as directed by the Planning Director. . 2. Provide staff support services to the Planning Commission. A. Coordinate Planning Commission meeting schedule changes. B. Prepare legal notices of public hearings, and comply with State Statutes and local ordinances regarding publication of notices in official newspaper, and mailing to affected residents. C. Collect, assemble, and distribute information packets for Planning Commission. D. Monitor and revise Planning Commission minutes as needed. 3. Research Ordinances and conduct surveys of other communities as directed by Planning Director. -# 7A.1 I j I i 1 i Planning Assistant Page 2 4. Conduct special projects as assigned by Planning Director. 5. Prepare and maintain updates to Land Use Map. 6. Assign addresses/street numbers to newly created parcels and lots and maintain updates to half-section maps. 7. Provide information on Flood Zone inquiries. 8. Maintain accounting of reimbursable planning projects. Monitor and code all invoices received from City Attorney and City Engineer for distribution to various planning projects. . 9. Responsible for data entry and maintenance of property managementdata base. 10. Process memos and reports as directed by Planning Director. Maintain correspondence file. 11. Write routine correspondence and reports such as memos, inquiries, and status/activity reports. 12. Provide information to other City staff regarding miscellaneous Planning and Zoning matters. B. Building . 1. Provide information concerning building permit procedures and standards to residents, businesses, developers and others involved in building construction activities as directed by Building Official. 2. Maintain data base of all building permits on computer. 3. Prepare reports on monthly, and quarterly basis, to Regional States and Federal agencies. 4. Receive complaints of City Code violations and arrange for investigation and followup toward their resolution. Maintain files and log. . . '-, Planning Assistant Page 3 5. Prepare Certificates of Occupancy for Building Official and maintain files. C. Web Site: 1. Prepares documents for web site, including incorporating necessary HTML code and PDF formats and/or use of web development software. 2. Transfers documents to appropriate location on web site. 3. Continually reviews web site to ensure all data is current, accurate, and that all links are working correctly at all times or notifies supervisor immediately of inability to maintain site. 4. Assists in the development and creation of new web pages using HTML coding or web development software. 5. Continually strives to improve web site through use of innovative products and on-going educational opportunities. 6. Continually strive to broaden knowledge on web tools and processes through continued education and attendance at communication meetings. ..' Planning Assistant Page 4 Reouirements: 1. Education - high school graduate, with minimum of three (3) years related experience. Attendance of workshops and seminars on Zoning and Land Use Laws is expected. 2. Knowledge of municipal office operations and systems. 3. Administer the Planning Director's duties, as directed, in a sound business-like manner which commands the respect of the public as well as other City personnel. 4. Ability to handle public contact with tact and effectiveness. . 5. Ability to maintain accurate and up-to-date records and complete reports. 6. Must be proficient typist with speed, accuracy, and good spelling and punctuation. 7. Should be a self-starter being able to compose routine answers to correspondence. 8. Previous experience with word processing, data base management, othe,r software applications, and computer equipment is required. 9. Ability to work effectively and harmoniously with others under a minimum of supervision with varying demands. . 10. Must be familiar with all aspects of the Planning/Zoning Department duties to be able to fill-in as work load adjustments are required. Phvsical Demands: 1. While performing the duties of this job, the employee is regularly required to sit, talk, see and hear. The employee frequently is required to use hands to finger, handle or feel objects, tools, or controls and to operate a variety of office equipment. The employee is occasionally required to stand, walk, reach with hands and arms, climb or balance, and stoop, kneel, or crouch. 2. Employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 25 pounds. . . Planning Assistant Page 5 3. Specific vision abilities required by job include close vision and the ability to adjust focus. The physical demands described above represent those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. Work Environment: 1. The work environment is that of a typical office. 2. The noise level in the work environment is moderately noisy on an occasional basis. 3. Office equipment typically operated includes telecommunications systems, computers, dictating machines, calculators, typewriters, and collators. The work environment characteristics described above are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 .www.ci.shorewood.mn.US . cityhatl@cLshorewood.mn.us ME1\tIORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROl\tl: Brad Nielsen DATE: 6 January 2000 RE: Appointment of Pamela Helling as Planning AssistantIW eb Developer FILE NO. Admin. (Personnel - Helling) As I mentioned when announcing Patti Helgesen's resignation, Pamela Helling has agreed to accept the position of Planning Assistant. The job description has been modified to include her current duty of Web Developer. She has done an outstanding job with Shorewood's web site, and having her continue with it will help considerably in the current staffing transition. . I originally approached Pamela about this position because of her excellent organizational skills, her ability to work well with people, and her expertise with computers. She appears eager to accept the challenges of a new position and I am confident that she will be an asset to the Planning and Protective Inspections Department. It is recommended that the Council approve a motion placing Pamela at Step 1 of the Planning Assistant/W eb Developer position. The corresponding salary adjustment would be effective 1 January 2000. This is the date Patti Helgesen originally intended to leave. Fortunately, Patti has agreed to stay on a while longer as a general troubleshooter and to continue training Pamela for the Planning Assistant position. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me prior to Monday night's meeting. Cc: A1 Rolek Pamela Helling ,. ~J I'RWTeO ON RECYCUD PAPeR A1Al- ;. CITY OF SHOREWOOD Position: ReceptionistJPark Secretary Objective and Scope: To perform secretarial, clerical and general front-desk duties. To receive telephone calls and visitors in a pleasant and business like manner and to refer items which this position is not responsible for to the proper City personnel. Relationship Reports to: Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk Specific Responsibilities . A. General Office and Receptionist: 1. Answers incoming telephone calls and in-person inquires in a diplomatic and helpful manner, providing accurate information, referring callers to appropriate individuals, and recording accurate information in their absence. 2. Collects incoming funds, prepares receipts and daily deposit, and balances petty cash. 3. Processes and delivers incoming mail, voice mail and E-mail messages on a daily basis, maintaining a log of requests. 4. Coordinates the preparation, production and maintenance of the City communication tools, including but not limited to: voice mail system, bulletin board, customer service evaluation forms, Shore wood profile, Friendly User Guide, Internet HomePage, and the Tonka Report. . 5. Ensures that supplies are available, information is organized and accessible, work requests are processed quickly, and deadlines are met. 6. Responsible for scheduling building inspections. 7. Assists with the acceptance and/or issuance of various applications, licenses and permits, including but not limited to: homestead applications; voter registration; dog licenses; burning; party; and plumbing, mechanical and building permits. 8. Responsible for light maintenance of general office areas. ___""'li $7~3\ ReceptionistJPark Secretary Page 2 9. Provides secretarial and general clerical assistance. 10. Organize bulk mailings (i.e. newsletter). 11. Performs other duties and assumes responsibilities as assigned. B. Elections: Assists in the administration of all elections including but not limited to: answering inquires, issuance of absentee ballots, and maintenance of files. C. Parks: 1. Prepares and distributes Park Commission and Park Foundation agendas and packets. 2. Attends Park Commission meetings when necessary to record meeting and draft minutes. Provides secretarial support and meeting follow-up. . 3. Acts as staff liaison to the Park Commission, providing staff support and meeting follow-up for the City Administrator and Public Works Director. 4. Maintains all records and files on park information, park projects and proposals, and maintains park related policies and procedures. 5. Coordinates the skating rink program, including but not limited to training, scheduling, and supervising personnel and rink usage. 6. Coordinates, with the help of Minnetonka Community Educational Services, the use of all fields within the City for athletic events. . 7. Coordinates snowmobile season activities, prepares newsletter articles, trail walks and gathers necessary data for end of the season report. Minimum Requirements. I. Education ~ High School diploma. Additional training in secretarial, computer or receptionist skills desired. 2. One to three years of experience after high school, to acquire work planning and office practice skills. 3. Knowledge of correct English usage, including grammar and spelling; visual proofreading skills. Can type with speed and accuracy and learn to use any required equipment. . . ReceptionistJPark Secretary Page 3 4. Ability to compose routine answers to correspondence and inquiries. 5. Ability to use the computer efficiently for word processing, spreadsheet computations, data base management and other assigned applications. 6. Ability to work effectively with others, by offering to help, responding to questions willingly, and looking for ways to improve cooperative efforts. 7. Ability to learn and remember facts about the department activities and staff; ability to plan ahead, accounting for interruptions and other unanticipated events. 8. Ability to exercise tact and discretion. 9. Ability to prioritize work effort so that level of supplies is monitored and work in progress is accomplished promptly and on time. 10. Must have outstanding grooming and deportment. Work Environment: 1. The work environment is that of a typical office. 2. The noise level in the work environment is moderately noisy on an occasional basis. 3. Office equipment typically operated includes telecommunications systems, computers, dictating machines, calculators, typewriters, and collators. The work environment characteristics described above are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. CITY OF SHORE WOOD Position: ReceptionistJ Secretary Objective and Scope: To perfonn secretarial, clerical and general front-desk duties. To receive telephone calls and visitors in a pleasant and business like manner and to refer items which this position is not responsible for to the proper City personnel. Relationship Reports to: Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk Specific ResDonsibilities .' A. General Office and Receptionist: 1. Answers incoming telephone calls and in-person inquires in a diplomatic and helpful manner, providing accurate information, referring callers to appropriate individuals, and recording accurate information in their absence. 2. Collects incoming funds, prepares receipts. Prepares daily deposit when necessary . 3. Processes and delivers incoming mail, voice mail and E-mail messages on a daily basis, maintaining a log of requests. 4. Responsible for scheduling building inspections. 5. Assists with the acceptance and/or issuance of various applications, licenses and permits, including but not limited to: homestead applications; voter registration; dog licenses; burning; party; and plumbing, mechanical and building permits. . 6. Provides secretarial and general clerical assistance. 7. Assist in organizing bulk mailings (i.e. newsletter). 8. Prepares and distributes meeting packets. Responsible for preparing the facilities for scheduled meetings. 9. Informs supervisor of the status of work assignments and coordinates work tasks with coworkers as appropriate. 10. Performs .other duties and assumes responsibilities as assigned. B. FilelRecord Maintenance: 1. Organizes and maintains up-to-date, accurate computerized records, data and filing systems, for easy access and retrieval. Receptionist/Secretary Page 2 2. Responsible for accurate and up to date filing maintenance of all administrative, project, contract, and property records for all departments. C. Elections: Assist in the administration of all elections including but not limited to: answering inquires, issuance of absentee ballots, and maintenance of files. D. Communications: 1. Assist in the preparation, production and maintenance of communications tools including but not limited to the newsletter, brochures, fliers, informational pieces, and new resident packets. 2. Coordinates volunteers for community events. 3. Maintains accurate and current records of home owners associations, fellow community leaders, and organizations. . 4. Initiates contact with other organizations or agencies as directed, to collect, research, or disseminate information. E. Recycling: 1. Reviews all correspondence regarding recycling and initiates appropriate response or action. 2. Assists in coordinating recycling / environmental efforts and promotional activities within the City. 3. Attends recycling meetings as the City representative. . Minimum Reauirements. 1. Education - High School diploma. Additional training in secretarial, computer or receptionist skills desired. 2. One to three years of experience after high school, to acquire work planning and office practice skills. 3. Knowledge of correct English usage, including grammar and spelling; visual proofreading skills. Can type with speed and accuracy and learn to use any required equipment. 4. Ability to compose routine answers to correspondence and inquiries. 5. Ability to use the computer efficiently for word processing, spreadsheet computations, data base management and other assigned applications. . . Receptionist/Secretary Page 3 6. Ability to work effectively with others, by offering to help, responding to questions willingly, and looking for ways to improve cooperative efforts. 7. Ability to learn and remember facts about the department activities and staff; ability to plan ahead, accounting for interruptions and other unanticipated events. 8. Ability to exercise tact and discretion. 9. Ability to prioritize work effort so that level of supplies is monitored and work in progress is accomplished promptly and on time. 10. Must have outstanding grooming and deportment. Work Environment: 1. The work environment is that of a typical office. 2. The noise level in the work environment is moderately noisy on an occasional basis. 3. Office equipment typically operated includes telecommunications systems, computers, dictating machines, calculators, typewriters, and collators. The work environment characteristics described above are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SH<?REWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cl.shorewood.mn.US . cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 6 January 2000 RE: Appointment of Twila Grout as ReceptionistlPark Secretary FILE NO. Admin. (Personnel- Grout) . Twila Grout has agreed to accept the position being vacated by Pamela Helling. Just as the web site duties will remain with Pamela, Twila's new job description will include her former duties as Park Secretary. TwiIa has demonstrated an excellent ability to juggle numerous tasks. This is evidenced by how she manages the compilation of packets for City Council, Park Commission and now the Land Conservation and Environment Committee. In this regard she is far more patient with her co-workers than I could ever be. Her temperament and professionalism at the front desk is not only recognized, but appreciated. I can not emphasize enough the importance of stability at the front desk position. It is recommended that the Council approve a motion appointing Twila Grout to the position of Receptionist/Park Secretary. Since her present and future duties are somewhat parallel, it is recommended that she be placed at Step 4 in the pay scale for Receptionist/Park Secretary. The corresponding salary adjustment would be effective 1 January 2000, the date Pamela Helling moved to the Planning Assistant position. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me prior to Monday night's meeting. Cc: AI Rolek Twila Grout n "J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER :l7A4 t CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331.8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhaJl@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen, Acting City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works J~ January 5, 2000 FROM: . DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion to Accept the Job Description for an Engineering Technician II As the City Council is aware, it is desired to create a new position of an Engineering Technician to help in the engineering and Public Works Department. Staff has tried unsuccessfully on three separate occasions to utilize non-technical individuals to try to shoulder the burden in the engineering department. This has been very frustrating and has lead to delays in completing projects in a timely manner. Therefore, Staff is recommending that a new position of Engineering Technician II be created to assist the City Engineer/Director of Public Works in aspects of performing routine calculations, maintaining records, and assisting the public in routine information requests. . Attachment 1 is the proposed job description for the engineering technician. While there are many responsibilities listed in the job description, many of the duties relate directly or indirectly to maintaining or addressing utility asbuilts and construction records. As such, it is recommended that the funding for this position be derived from the utility funds according to the following breakdown of estimated time spent in each task area for the position. . Administration and record keeping sanitary sewer system: . Administration and record keeping municipal water system: . Stormwater management and record keeping: 60 percent 25 percent 15 percent Certainly, the above breakdown has been greatly simplified regarding the areas of work. While there are areas involving roadway and right of way management in the day to day operations, it is recommended that the funding for the position be derived by the utility budgets listed above. Expenditures from the roadway fund have typically occurred by the 5-year capital improvement fund, and have not been used to fund staff positions. no "J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 71l, \ Mayor and City Council Job Description Engineering Tech II January 5,2000 Page 2 of2 In addition, time spent on public works improvement projects and development projects will be charged to the project fund, or directly to the developer, as appropriate. Attachment 2 is an excerpt from the 1999 Stanton Salary Survey. Table 1 is a brief summary of comparable positions for municipalities similar to the City of Shorewood. City Lakeville White Bear Lake Columbia Heights Savaj:?;e Stillwater Shako Dee Farmington Average Values Minimum Annual Salary $30,072 $29,868 $25,812 $27,324 $30,372 $30,672 $31.176 $29,328 Maximum Annual Salarv $35,712 $34,260 $32,256 $36,432 $37,956 $38,340 $37.368 $36,046 Number of Steps in Pay Scale 6 . 4 6 6 5 8 4 6 Table 1 If the position of Engineering Technician is approved, it is recommended that the following pay range be applicable for the position. A seven-step pay scale is the standard scale for the City of Shorewood. . Level Salary 1 $29,553 2 $30,634 3 $31,715 4 $32,796 5 $33,878 6 $34,959 7 $36,040 Table 2 If acceptable a motion approving the job description and salary range would be appropriate. If approved, authorization for advertisement for the position would be brought to the City Council for consideration at the next City Council meeting. ~ . . " CITY OF SHOREWOOD POSITION: Engineering Technician II DEPARTMENT: Engineering DATE: January 2000 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE: To provide assistance and support to the Engineering Department, Department of Public Works and the public in providing engineering calculations and other studies as assigned. RELATIONSHIPS: Reports: City EngineerlDirector of Public Works SPECIFIC RESPONSmILITIES: 1. General Engineering Assistance a. Perform engineering calculations and prepare diagrammatics as directed by the City Engineer. b. Perform calculations and quantity takeoffs on permit applications and projects. c. Aid the City Engineer in preparation of the 5 year Capital Improvement Program. d. Assist in the preparation of development contracts and review of site plans, plats, construction plans and specifications, and other reports provided to the Engineering Department as requested by the City Engineer. e. Research and complete other surveys and reports from agencies such as the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (annual Sewer Use Survey), Department of Natural Resources (Water Pumping Permits), etc., for the City Engineer's review and approval. f. Become proficient with the PHASER Pavement Management System as directed by the City Engineer. g. Update and track service tie sheets for utility services to individual properties. Attachment 1 " h. Update, and keep current sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer asbuilt drawings, both by manual drafting and computer aided design methods. 1. Aid the City Engineer in updating GIS databases regarding utility information. J. Assist the City Engineer in compiling and keeping current standard details and specifications for construction standards. k. Assist the City Engineer in performing routine stormwater and drainage calculations for site designs. I. Maintain the City's traffic count records and conduct traffic counts in compliance with annual State-Aid reporting requirements and other traffic studies requested. m. Maintain project files with current design and correspondence articles. . 2. Administration a. Assist the public and contractors with utility location data. b. Run copies of prints for the public and/or City staff as needed. c. Maintain neat/orderly map files and work area. d. Handle calls from the public, as requested, and resolve issues keeping City Engineer informed/involved when appropriate. e. Assist the City Engineer in preparation of annual mileage certification for the Minnesota Office of State Aid. . f. Become intimately familiar with the project path for public works improvement projects and associated contract documents. g. Maintain bond expiration files related to street excavation permits. 3. Construction a. Become intimately familiar with construction documents; State Aid plan and construction requirements, and public works improvement plans and specifications b. Become proficient at checking the accuracy of payment vouchers for public works improvement projects. ~ . . REOUlREMENTS 1. A high school diploma with completion of an approved vocational training program in civil engineering technology. 2. A Class C or D license valid in the State of Minnesota 3. Ability to. establish and maintain effective relationships and deal properly with the public. 4. Ability to utilize engineering tools such as planimeter, transit, level, and blue line lettering machines and computer aided design tools. 5. Ability to utilize the computer efficiently for spreadsheet calculations, word processing, data base management, and drafting/GIS applications. 6. A demonstrated ability to work independently and successfully complete projects with minimal supervision. 7. Ability to prioritize projects to complete tasks in a timely and effective manner. WORK EVIRONMENT: 1. The work environment includes that of an office environment, limited construction site investigations, and the Public Works Facility. 2. Noise level is generally moderate, with limited exposure to heavy equipment and construction noise or conditions that may require the use of hearing protection, eye protection, or other personal protective equipment. 3. Equipment typically operated includes, telecommunications equipment, computers, calculators, surveying-inspection equipment, and light duty vehicles. SURVEY JOB TITLE: Engineering Technician 2 (Cont.) JOB NO. 21 . . Uultiple Range U WAGE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION N WTD I 0 /I OF UEAN 0 I JURISDICTION EMPL RATES 2058 2613 3047 3258. N T TITLE -. -...... _. -..... - -RANGE DATA.... - - -....... -...- EXCLUDING LONGEVITY INCLUDING LONGEVITY YRS YRS /I OF TO /I OF TO UIN MAX STEPS UAX UAX STEPS MAX -.--...................................................-............................................................................................................................................... ......................................................... WOODBURY 1 2555 N Y ENGR TECIl I 2555 2822 4 3.0 LAKEVILLE 1 2929 N Y ENG TECIl 2 2506 2976 6 5.0 JNVER GROVE HEIGIlTS 2 3366 P 2 Y Y ENG TECIl I 2721 3366 6 4.0 WItHE BEAR LAKE 2 2733 P Y Y ENG TECIl II 2489 2855 4 3.0 GROUP STATISTICS: 2996 Ql : 2817 Q2: 2892 Q3: 3256 Average: 2539 319i 3078 ..............................................................................................................-........................................................................-............... ................................................................. Cot.UYOIA IIEIGllTS 1 2688P Y Y ENG TEell II 2151 2688 6 4.0 SAVAGE 3 2429 3 N V ENO TECII 2 2277 3036 6 4.0 HASTINGS 2 3093 Y Y ENG AIDE II 2133 3047 4 2.0 3138 3 15 STIllWATER 1 2531 Y Y ENG TECIl 2 2531 3163 5 3.0 3380 4 20 SIIAI<OI'EE 2 2693 2 N Y TECII II 2556 3195 8 7.0 GROUP STATISTICS: 2674 01: 2480 Q2: 2614 03: 2893 Average: 2374 3110 3259 ...............................-.......--....................-........-................. ......................................................-....... ..'.......... FARMINGTON 2747 Y V ENG TECII 2598 3114 4 3.0 GROUP STATISTICS: 2747 Ql : 2747 Q2: 2747 Q3: 2747 Average: 2598 3114 ........-......--.................................-........-...........................-...........-................................-...............................-.....-............................ .... OVERALL: 133 2886 37 36 26 34 2373 3110 JOB RATES DISTRIBUTION: Pl0= 2193 Ql= 2589 Q2= 2955 Q3= 3258 P90= 3404 ~ fl ~ ! ~ .... ~ " " " " ", '" , . ". ". .. ~ .. IJ!'tt tIP\t!l .. !Ifl!Ii .. !Ii..- ... ~,.... , . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us . cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us lVIEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DA TE: 6 January 2000 RE: Receptionist/Secretary Position FILE NO. Admin.(Personnel) Staff was relieved to hear that the Council was agreeable to considering. keeping the Receptionist/Secretary position (Twila's current job) as a full-time position. The suggestion that this position be made part-time was largely to offset the cost of an engineering technician. As you can see from the City Engineer's memorandum, dated 5 January 2000, it is recommended that the technician salary be funded almost entirely from existing utility funds. Some of that salary will also be offset by pass-through billing for projects (i.e. charged to developers). . With respect to the receptionist position, three words: 1) service; 2) stability; and 3) sanity. The front desk, whether by telephone or in person, is the first contact for most of our "customers". It is extremely important that the phones are answered promptly, courteously and with enough knowledge of our operation to direct the call to the right place. Much of the service we provide really starts at the front desk. With a few exceptions we have not had good luck filling part-time positions. A full-time position results in fewer turnovers and less time spent retraining. This stability benefits not only residents, but other staff members as well. Anyone who has ever covered the front desk knows that it can at times seem like the pit at the New York Stock Exchange. Multiple phone lines, combined with people at the counter leaves few blocks of time in which to focus on some of the duties assigned to the position. I've tried writing a letter or memo while covering the phones. It's not easy. It is important that personnel at the front desk be able to escape to a quiet location to {'\ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ... "7A' ~ . . Memorandum Re: Receptionist/Secretary Position 6 January 2000 perform some of their duties on a routine basis. I feel strongly that residents are best served by sane people. Pamela Helliing's memo, dated 23 December, describes how duties at the front desk are distributed. It should be noted that this year's budget had anticipated two full-time people at the front desk. In light of Larry's recommendation to fund the technician position out of the utility funds, the general fund is not adversely impacted. Consequently, it is recommended that the position remain full-time and that staff be authorized to advertise for the position. If you have any questions, please call me prior to Monday night's meeting. cc: AI Rolek -2- ." Memorandum To: Jim HumI. Brad Nielsen CC: Twila Grout From: Pamela Helling Date: December 23, 1999 Re: Job Descriptions . Attached are draft copies of the front desk job descriptions. In the past 4 months, I average about 28% (I I hrs/wk) of my time orking on the web site. From my job description I removed the web site respon ibilities and added the Parks responsibilities for Twila. ReceDtionistlPark Secretarv Position Following is what I think the average percentage of time spent in e various job duties might look like. Of Course some weeks will vary with park and council packets, newsletter, elections, quarterly sewer bills etc. I also thou ht it would be a good idea if Twila continued to learn more about the web site and ave some of those responsibilities. I 2~B JWk 8- 15 hr/wk 50-65% . General Office/ReceptionistIFront Desk Parks Secretary 25-35% Web Site 10% 4 hrfwk ReceDtionistlSecretarv General OfficeIReceptionist/Front Desk 50% 20 hrfwk Filing Maintenance 20% 8 hr/wk CommunicationslRecycling 10% 4 hr/wk Secretarial SUpport for Dep.CIerk 20% 8 hr/wk 1 1999 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES ApPROVED JANUARY 25, 1999 1. Needs to be done in 1999 . => Decide on alignment for Country Club RoadlSmithtown intersection => Consider recommendations of the Fire Department Task Force (in July) => Review Comprehensive Plan, get significant public input and submission b June => Complete stormwater management plan - submit with Comprehensive Plan => Consider policy on placement of communication antenna facilities 2. High Priority => Implement trail planning process => Develop a strategy to improve paramedic rescue response times in much of horewood => Land Conservation report implementation 3. Second Prioirty => Define roll in affordable senior housing => Undertake a three year liquor plan to improve operations => Consider a ward system for Shorewood => Actively pursue burying utility lines => Consideration of all alternatives for transit service => Re-evaluate design criteria for City streets 4. Third Priority => Review water policies => Consider strategies to reduce legal costs => Consider a street reconstruction assessment policy (task force recommended) => Up-date subdivision ordinance => Revisit snowmobiles in Shorewood => Implement a realistic plan to expand web page/improve communications => Initiate design of Smithtown Road by considering property rights and trail issues 5. Lowest (or no) Priority => Consider policy on. right-of-way usage by utilities => Become more involved in educating youth (and adults) in local government => Consider some more organized approach for garbage collection '~. 1:t7fJ WIAELESS SITE SPECIALISTS Inc 2850 Metro Drive Suite 250 Bloomington. MN 55425 612/851-7877 1 ;;:;;. -c iC' F !~~\ ; : it' - 7. f! '-.CCJr1(0:Ul... ,; ! ~, '-""'-' ;oJ.,V i",t;]VJ .;.- : j \ i 8y___- ----------------- 12/16/1999 City of Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: Intent to Place Antennas on City Water Tower . Dear City Council Members: This letter is to request permission to proceed in making an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for cellular antennas on city property located at 26352 Smithtown Road. AT&T Wireless Services would like to place up to nine antennas on the existing water tower at heights of approximately 125 feet. Actual heights and azimuths would be present in the application that would be filed by F ebrllilry 2, 2000, should AT&T and its consultants be granted permission to make such application. Along with the antennas, AT&T Wireless Services will need to build an equipment shelter 12 feet by 28 feet near the base of the water tower. This shelter would be constructed in a fashion as requested by the city. . I, Julie Townsend, will be representing AT&T Wireless Services. All questions, comments and concerns may be directed to me; please do not hesitate to call, I can be reached at 612-851-7877. In responding to this request, please reply in writing and send to me at 2850 Metro Drive, Suite 250, Bloomington, MN 55425. Thank you for your time and consideration. Very Truly Yours, rJd 4TO nd ~ t AT&T.Wm:less Services cc. Brad Nielsen Larry Brown *''7c, CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.ci.shorewood.mn.US. citynall@ci.shorewood.mn.us MEl\tIORANDUl\tI TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 6 January 2000 RE: Street Light Request - Country Club Road at North Entrance to City Hall/Senior Center Property FILE NO.: 405 (Street Lights) Representatives of the South Shore Senior Center have petitioned the City (see Exhibit A, attached)to approve a street light on Country Club Road at the north entrance to the City Hall/Senior Center property (see Exhibit B). The proposed location meets Shorewood's criteria for the location of street lights, which cites traffic safety as a criteria for the placement of lights. . Per City policy notice has been sent to property owners within 500 feet. The notice and mailing list are shown on Exhibit C. Those most affected by the location of the light (e.g. the Country Club, B&J Automotive, etc.) appear to have no problem with the proposal. As of this writing we have not heard from neighboring residents. It is recommended that a light, identical to the one at the south entry to City Hall, be installed per the request. Cc: Larry Brown Joyce Flury n ~.. PRINTEO ON RECYCl.Ell PAPER #70 I GO .~ SOUTHSHORE CENTER 5735 Country Club Road, Shorewood. MN 55331 December 27, 1999 Phone: (612) 474-7635 FAX: (612) -+74-8852 City of Shore wood Mayor and Members of the City Council: Re: Petition for Street Light . We request that a street light be installed on the utility pole at 5735 Country Club Road at the entrance to the Southshore Center. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. . Sincerely, . C:;2yz?;r~/r Joyce Flury, Center Director ~~ Robert Gagne, Building Committee, Friends of Southshore Center lJ-tf ./-0 j2~#:; 8~~b;t A ~ /' l\id~ \ \ \ \~' ~ FROG ISLAND . ~ N I I I n 400 , 0 400 Feet I E~".''o,+ , . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOO. MINNESOTA 55331--8927 . (612) 474-3236 ~AX (612) 474-0128 . WWW..ci.shorewooa.mn.us.cityhall@cLsi.1orewood.mn.u5 NOTICE The Shorewood City Council hereby notifies all property owners within 500 feet of the driveway entrance to the Southshore Center (see site location map on reverse side) that the Council will consider a request for a street light at that location 3.t their meeting on 10 January 2000 in the Council Chambers of Shorewood City Hall. 5755 Country Oub Road. The meeting startS at 7 :00 P .1vt You are invited to attend this meeting to express your opinions and concerns. If you can not attend the meeting, you may respond in writing to: Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood. MN 55331 FAX # 474-0128 e-mail: cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us If you have any questions relative to this matter. you may call City Hall at 474-3236. n- . ~.1 PRINTED OH RECYCl.!D PAPER . ~;b,t c.." ..,' . Homeowner 5805 Echo Rd Shorewood. YfN 55331 Homeowner 5815 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 58'25 Echo Rd Shorewood. rvIN 5533 I Homeowner 5795 Country Club Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5830 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5810 Echo Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Homeowner 5800 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5790 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5780 Echo Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Homeowner 5760 Echo Rd .Shorewood. lYIN 55331 Homeowner 5750 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5740 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5730 Echo Rd Shorewood, lYIN 55331 Homeowner 5720 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5690 Echo Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Homeowner 5680 Echo Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Homeowner 5670 Echo Rd Shorewood.MN 55331 Homeowner 24250 Smithtown Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Joyce Flury .ob Ga2ne ~outhshore Center 5735 Country Club Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 Charles d. Howe 4730 Cavan Rd rvfound.~ 55364 Fmaserve Inc Twin Cities Stores 7108 Airport Rd EI Paso. TX 79906 Colleen Moore 5955 Seamans Dr Shorewood~ MN 55331 Belle Plaine Car Wash Ine Todd Lindeman 2630 Acorn Rd Chaska. MN 55318 American Lemon No. 259 ... 24450 Smithtown Rd Shorewood. MN 55331 David E. Johnson 5660 Co. Rd. 19 Shorewood, MN 55331 City ofTonka Bay 4901 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay, iYIN 55331 Mtka Country Oub Assn P.O. Box 360 Excelsior. MN 55331 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE SPECIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE WHEREAS, Resolution 98-81, dated August 24, 1998 cOIl1mitted Shorewood to participating in a Special Fire Department Review Committee; and WHEREAS, said Committee produced a final report with recommendations on May 25, 1999; and . WHEREAS, Resolution 99-41, concluded, "that the recommendations of the Excelsior Fire Review Committee are accepted, and that the City of Shorewood supports the recommendation of the Committee that the Excelsior Fire Review Committee shall be extended until December 31, 1999 with the same procedures, composition and sharing of expenses as previously established and with the charge of accomplishing the seven items included in Recommendation Number Two in its report of May 25, 1999." and WHEREAS, said Committee has met on numerous occasions to work on a governance structure for ajoint fire district, the last meeting date being December 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, a draft of a Joint Powers Agreement is scheduled to be reviewed by the Committee in late January 2000; and . WHEREAS, the initial guiding principle of the Committee was to "base decisions on what is good for the service area (not the individual cities)."; and WHEREAS, the Committee feels strongly that the Joint Powers governing board should be comprised of one elected representative from each City Council; and WHEREAS, according to meeting minutes, the Excelsior Council representative stated at the December 14 Committee meeting: "...it would be wise to establish a Transition Board, one that could begin its work with Fire Department issues immediately. The items on the list for action once the Governing Board is established are extremely important, and do not deserve to be delayed until the District is formally in existence."; and WHEREAS, said timely issues identified in the December 14 Committee minutes include: 1) 2) 3) Appointment of a full-time administrator/chief Establishing policies for medical responses Revise/develop the capital equipment improvement/replacement program #7E 4) Perform study on Fire station(s) needs and location analysis 5) Ensure continuity for the Excelsior Firefighters Relief Association 6) Develop strategies for recruitment of firefighters 7) Develop strategies for retention of firefighters; and WHEREAS, said issues are integral to the success of the Department and a future governing board; and WHEREAS, the December 14, 1999 Committee meeting minutes further state: "Committee members wished to get further direction from their Councils before agreeing to the establishment of, or participating on a Transition Board." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that the Excelsior Fire Review Committee be extended until a Joint Powers agreement is executed and that said Committee be hereafter referred to as the Transition Committee. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Transition Committee have the same makeup as the Fire Review Committee, carry on the work of the Fire Review Committee, begin to address identified issues and prepare for transition of authority to a Joint Powers Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Mayor Woody Love is hereby appointed as Shorewood's representative to the Transition Committee and Councilmember John Garfunkel is appointed alternate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Transition Committee is requested to involve Fire Department personnel in decisions during the transition period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each City is hereby urged to take similar action to create a Transition Committee. .~ PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 10th day of January, 2000. WOODY LOVE, MAYOR ATTEST: JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer December 20, 1999 James Hurm Shorewood City Administrator 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 . Dear Jim: Re: Assessment Agreement A20408 This Assessment Agreement between the County of Hennepin and the City of Shorewood expires July 31, 2000. Section 11 of this agreement provides that this agreement may be extended for a term of four (4) years by either giving the other written notice of its. intent to so extend no less than 150 days prior to the termination of this agreement. We would appreciate a written notice of your intent at your earliest convenience so we may start planning for the 2001 assessment. . We truly appreciate our professional association with the City of Shorewood and look forward to performing assessment services for the City. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to call me at 348-3046. Very truly yours, ~17l"1r Thomas J. May Hennepin County Assessor TJM:jn Cc: Keith Rennerfeldt [~ IE (f: ~ n ff. ~Jr I . ;1 ' in; UtL; 221999 ;Ui ;UII W i ~ . . I I IBy County Assessor Department A,2103 Hennepin County GovemmentCenter Minneapolis. Minnesota 55487,0213 Recycled Paper ~?F Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity .Employer June 5, 1999 .-\ ;~ :;::~ ;-= :-;" --, .- - . ~. The Honorable Woody Love Mayor of the City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood MN 55331 . Dear Mayor Love: Re: Contract Assessment Estimate for the 2000 Assessment To assist you in your budgeting process for 2000, we are providing an estimate for our contractual assessment charge. This estimate of $68,900.00* is based on current unit pricing rates, established by the Hennepin County Board, applied to 25% of your total residential, commercial, industrial, apartment and vacant land parcels which we annually appraise. This same unit rate is also applied to the current number of new construction units whieh we appraise annually. In..addition, a charge is included for administration of statutory programs such as This Old House, limited market value, green acres and transit zone. . If you need more detail or have any questions, please feel free to call or write. Very truly yours, ~~ Thomas J. May Hennepin County Assessor TJM:jb Ene. cc:. Teri Naab County Assessor Department A.2I03 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487.0213 Recycled Paper *First Half Payment of $34,450 Due December 1999 Contract No. A20408 AGREEMENT . THIS'AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "CITY"; WHEREAS, said CITY lies wholly within the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN and constitutes a separate assessment district; and WHEREAS. under such circumstances, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.072 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 permit the County Assessor to provide for the assessment of property; and WHEREAS, said CITY desires the COUNTY to perform certain assessments on behalf of said CITY; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to cooperate with said CITY by completing the assessment in a proper manner; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. The COUNTY shall perform the 1999 and 2000 property assessment for the CITY of SHOREWOOD in accordance with property assessment procedures and practices established and observed by the COUNTY, the validity and reasonableness of which are hereby acknowledged and approved by the CITY. Any such practices and procedures may be changed from time to time, by the COUNTY in its sole judgment. when good and efficient assessment procedures so require. The property assessment by the COUNTY shall be composed of those assessment services which are set forth in Exhibit A; . attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, provided that the time frames set forth therein shall be considered to be approximate only. 2. All information, records, data, reports, etc. necessary to allow the COUNTY to carry out its herein responsibilities shall be furnished to the COUNTY without charge by the CITY, and the CITY agrees to cooperate in good faith with the COUNTY in carrying out the work under this Agreement 3. The CITY agrees to furnish office space needed by the COUNTY, without charge, at appropriate places in the CITY's offices. The keys thereto shall be provided to the COUNTY. The CITY assures that such areas shall not be unattended, during or after work of any kind by or on behalf of the CITY, in . any area occupied by the COUNTY as provided herein, or if unattended, the CITY shall make certain that such areas are locked and secured. Such office space shall be sufficient in size to accommodate reasonably two (2) appraisers and any furniture placed therein. The office space shall be available for the COUNTY's use at any and all times during the CITY's business hours, and during all such hours the COUNTY shall be provided with levels of heat. air conditioning and ventilation as are appropriate for the seasons. 4. The CITY also agrees to provide appropriate desk and office . furniture as necessary, clerical and secretarial support necessary and reasonable for the carrying out of the work herein, necessary office supplies and equipment, copying machines and fax machines and their respective supplies, and telephone service to the COUNTY, aJlwithout charge to the COUNTY. 5. It shall be the responsibility of the CITY to have available at the CITY's offices each CITY working day a person who has such knowfedge and skill to be able to answer routine questions pertaining to homesteads and property assessment matters and to receive, evaluate and organize homestead applications. It shall also be the responsibility of the CIlY to promptiy refer any (2) homestead application which needs investigation to the COUNTY. 6. In accordance with Hennepin County Affirmative Action Policy and the County Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, ex- offender status or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws, rules and regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. . 7. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of joint venturers or co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the CITY as the agent, representative or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Any and aU personnel of CITY or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any activity under this Agreement, shaJl have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY and shall not be considered employees of the COUNTY and any and all claims that mayor might arise under . the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and aU claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the CITY, its officers, agents, CITY or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the COUNTY, and CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission or court Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any I .. (3) , lo. , I I f I l j compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the COUNTY, including, without Iimitation,.tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay and P .E.R.A. 8. CITY agrees that it will defend and hold the COUNTY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers harmless from any and all liability (statutory or otherwise) claims, suits, damages, judgments, interest, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees and disbursements incurred in the defense thereof) resulting from or caused by any act or omission of the CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, employees or duly authorized volunteers in the performance of the responsibilities provided by this Agreement. 9. The COUNTY shall endeavor to perform all services caned for herein in an efficient manner. The sole and exclusive remedies for any breach of this Agreement by the COUNTY and for COUNTY's liability of any kind whatsoever, including but not limited to liability for negligence with respect to the services hereunder, shall be limited to correcting diligently any deficiency in said services as is reasonably possible under the pertinent circumstances. In no event shall the COUNTY be liable for special, incidental. or consequential damages or for any business or financial loss whatsoever. 10. Neither party hereto shall be deemed to be in default of any provision of this Agreement, or for delay or failure in performance. resulting from causes beyond the reasonable control of such party, which causes shall include, . . (4) . . but are not limited to, acts of God, labor disputes, acts of civil or military authority, fire, civil disturbance, changes in laws, ordinances or regulations which materially affect the provisions hereof, or any other causes beyond the parties' reasonable control. 11. This Agreement shall commence on September 1, 1998, and shall terminate on July 31,2000. Either party may initiate an extension of this Agreement for a term of four (4) years by giving the other written notice of its intent to so extend no less than 150 days prior to the termination of this Agreement. If the party who receives said notice of intent to extend gives written notice to the other party of its desire not to extend within 110 days prior to termination of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate on July 31, 2002. Nothing herein shall preclude the parties, prior to the end of this Agreement, from agreeing to extend this contract for a term of four (4) years. Any extended term hereof shall be on the same terms and conditions set forth herein. Either party may terminate this Agreement for 1ust cause" as determined by the Commissioner of Revenue after hearing for such a determination is held by the Commissioner of Revenue and which has been attended by representatives of COUNTY and CITY or which said representatives had a reasonable opportunity to attend, provided that after such detennination, any part desiring to cancel this Agreement may do so by giving the other party no less than 120 days' written notice. If the CITY should cancel this Agreement, as above provided, before the completion of the then current property assessment by the COUNTY, the CITY agrees to defend and hold the COUNTY, (5) its officials, officers. agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers harmless from any liability that might ensue as a result of the non-completion of a property tax assessment. For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "just cause" shall mean the failure of any party hereto reasonably to perform a material responsibility arising hereunder. 12. A In consideration of said assessment services, the CITY agrees to pay the COUNTY the sum of Sixty-Five Thousand ($65,000.00) Dollars for each assessment, provided that any payment for the current year's assessment may . be increased or decreased by that amount which exceeds or is less than the COUNTY's estimated cost of appraising new construction and new parcels for the current year's assessment. The amount of any increase or decrease shall be specified in the billing for the current year's assessment 12.8. Regarding each assessment, in addition to being subject to adjustment in the above manner, said assessment cost of $65,000.00 may also be increased by the COUNTY if: . (1) The COUNTY determines that any cost to the COUNTY in carrying out any aspect of this Agreement has increased, including but not limited to the following types of costs: new construction and new parcel appraisals, gasoline, postage, supplies, labor (including fringe benefits) and other types of costs, whether similar or dissimilar; and/or 2) The COUNTY reasonably determines that other costs should be included in the costs of assessment work. If the COUNTY desires to increase the assessment cost pursuant to this paragraph 12(b), it shall give written notice thereof by June 15 of any year (6) . . and such increase shall apply to the assessment fOf the calendar yeaf next following the current calendar year. Any such notification shall specifically set forth the amount of any new construction and new parcel appraisal charges. Notwithstanding any provisions herein to the contrary, if any such increase, exclusive of any charge for the estimated costs of new construction and new pafcel appraisals, exceeds ten (10%) percent of the amount charged for the assessment for the then current calendar year, exclusive of any charge for the estimated costs of new construction and new parcel appraisals, the CITY may cancel this Agreement by giving to the COUNTY written notice thereof, provided that said cancellation notice must be received by the COUNTY not later than July 24 of the then current calendar year and said cancellation shall be effective no earlier than five (5) days after the receipt of said notice by the COUNTY and not later than July 31 of said current calendar year. Supportive records of the cost increase will be open to inspection by the CITY at such times as are mutually agreed upon by the COUNTY and CITY. Failure of the COUNTY to give the CITY a price-change notice by June 15 shall not predude the COUNTY from giving CITY such notice after said date but prior to September 1 of any year, provided that if such price increase exceeds said ten (10%) - all as above set forth - the CITY may cancel this Agreement if the COUNTY receives notice thereof not later than thirty-nine (39) days from the date of receipt by the CITY of any said fate price-change notice, provided further that any such cancellation shall be effective not earlier than five (5) days after COUNTY's receipt of said canceUation notice and not later than forty-six (46) days after the. CITY's receipt of any said price-increase notice. Payment by the CITY for each assessment shall be made in the following manner: Approximately one--haJf (112) of the cost of an assessment (the amount payable being set forth in a bill sent by the COUNTY to the CITY) (7) shall be paid by the CITY no later than the fifteenth (15) day of the December which precedes the pertinent assessment year; and the remaining portion of said cost (the amount payable being set forth in a bill sent by the COUNTY to the CITY) shall be paid by the CITY no later than July 15 of the pertinent assessment year. The COUNTY may bill the CITY after the aforesaid dates and in each such case, the CITY shall pay such bill within fifteen (15) days after receipt thereof. In the event the CITY receives a bill less than fifteen (15) days before said December 15 or said July 15, such bill shall be paid not more than fifteen (15) days after its receipt. 13. Any notice or demand, which mayor must be given or made by a party hereto, under the terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the other party . addressed as follows: . TO CITY: Mayor, City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 TO COUNTY: Hennepin County Administrator 2300A Govemment Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 County Assessor Hennepin County 2103A Govemment Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 Assistant County Assessor Hennepin County 2103A Govemment Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 . copies to: Any party may designate a different addressee or address at any time by giving written notice thereof as above provided. Any notice, if mailed, (8) properly addressed, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, shall be deemed dispatched on the registered date or that stamped on the certified mail receipt and shall be deemed received within the second business day thereafter or when it is actually received, whichever is sooner. Any notice delivered by hand shall be deemed received upon actual delivery. 14. It is expressly understood that the obligations of the CITY under Paragraphs 7, 8, 11, and 12 hereof and the obligations of the CITY which, by their sense and context, are intended to survive the performance thereof by the CITY, shall so survive the completion of performance. termination or cancellation . of this Agreement. . [This space left intentionally blank.1 (9) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf, this & ~ C C---- APPROVED AS TO FORM: .- ( . ~c~~k~Qn~~~~rf ../ crry O~SMREWOOD ~ (7 By: ~~. U~ Its Mayor . / . . \j" C~l L /:: ~ 1 . .,., And: ,.;. vV X-<1 "; \"t./ t/ ..'l.r \. Its y' Clerk/Administrator The above Agreement No. A20408 is hereby approved by the Commissioner of . Revenue this.),7 1>. day of'''7'.~t.f''J".~ ~ : ~.9<~~ \ ( W~~'-t?!J ;L-'L~L r=J:.....COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE (10) Contract No. A20408 EXHIBIT A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 1. Physically inspect and revalue 25% of the real property, as required by law. . 2. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and renovation. 3. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review - approximate dates: March through May 15. 4. Attend Board of Review. Per Board request, make all necessary review appraisals. Approximate dates: April 1 - May 31 . 5. Keep updated field card file - current values, homestead and cfassification data. . 6. Print mail and post valuation notices and homestead cards. 7. Respond to taxpayers regarding assessment or appraisal problems or inquiries periodically during contract term. 8. Make divisions and combinations periodically during contract term. 9. Initiate, for the taxpayer, abatement applications periodically during contract term, as requested. 10. Make appraisals for, testify or negotiate all District Court or Tax Court filings during the contract term. 11. Post values from appraisal cards to assessment rolls. 12. As needed, per sales analysis, adjust estimated market values on those properties not physically inspected. T:\Oivision\Civil\Contrads\tle County\City of Shorewood-AgreementA20408.doc (11) CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.cLshorewood.mn.us.cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen, Acting City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works *' January 6, 2000 FROM: . DATE: RE: Feasibility Report for Water Utility Improvements - Shorewood Ponds Watermain Loop Included in your packet is the feasibility report for the Shorewood Ponds watermain loop, as prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc. As the City Council recalls, several alternatives for the extension of watermain down the entire length of Eureka Road, had been investigated previously, but failed due to public opposition for the project. After the original concept failed, it was determined that there are still three alternatives that exist for looping of the watermain. The feasibility report included in the City Council packet . investigates these alternatives. Alternative 1 considers the extension of a 12 inch trunk watermain adjacent the westerly property boundary of Shorewood Ponds (next to Freeman Ballfield 2), north along Reutiman Lane, through Freeman Ballfields 4 and 5 and ultimately half way down the north half of Eureka Way. At that endpoint, the watermain would connect into the 8 inch watermain which was extended to the westerly property boundary of the Smithtown Meadows Project (refer to Attachment 1). While this alignment provides the increased flow rates for Shorewood Ponds and the Shorewood Oaks Subdivision, it does not provide a true looped system for the Shorewood Ponds development. Estimated construction and design costs are $361,561.20. This does not include any easement acquisition costs for the project. Drainage and utility easements would have to be obtained for placement of the utility down the private drive of Eureka Way. This alignment has the potential to serve only two properties along Eureka Way. ft t..1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER dJ-g ,4 .. t. Mayor and City Council Feasibility Report Water Utility January 6, 2000 Page 2 of2 Alternative 2 considers the extension of 12-inch diameter watermain from the intersection of Park Drive and Eureka Road, along the west ditch-line of Eureka Road, to the Freeman Park entrance. From that point the watermain would extend north adjacent to the proposed Freeman Park Multi- purpose Building, along Freeman Field 4, and to the same termini west of Smithtown Meadows as described in Alternative 1 (refer to Attachment 2). The estimated design and construction cost of this alternative is $369,390.45. This alignment provides a true loop for the Shorewood Ponds project. . Under this scenario, water services would not be extended across to the east side of Eureka Road. However, the two residents along the east side of Eureka Road, within the project limits, would have the benefit of watermain within service distance to their. homes. In addition, hydrants for fire protection would be located on Eureka Road, versus interior to the park. Alternative 3 considers the same alignment as Alternative 2, with the exception that the proposed watermain extends an additional 500 feet down Eureka Way to Smithtown Road. At this point, the main would connect to the 16 inch trunk main within Smithtown Road (refer to Attachment 3). While this alternative is the most expensive, connection to the trunk watermain in Smithtown doubles the capacity in the proposed watermain. Design and construction costs of Alternative 3 are estimated at $388,695.45. This alternative provides the most benefit to the service area. Fire flows would be maximized, while providing a true loop to the Shorewood Ponds Development. Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 provide a maximum of 4 homes that could also be serviced by the proposed watermain, if the . residents desire. Recommendations: While all three alternatives are technically feasible, Alternative 3 provides the most benefit to the service area. Ultimately, $315,000 will be collected in water fees from the Shorewood Ponds Development. This figure was listed incorrectly as $310,000 in the feasibility report). This leaves a shortfall of $73,695.45. This does not account for the potential of assessments along Eureka Way. At the time of this report, staff has not had the opportunity to update the latest municipal water financial projections to see if the remaining portion can be funded by the water fund. Therefore, staff is recommending that no action be taken on the report until such time as the financial impacts of the alternatives can be incorporated into the water fund projections. . . ~ '.or.. .....-- , o 100 lOO SCALE 1 "= 250' + CJ .. I ,,'Hi"1 CJ Legend Driveway Reconstruction Park Reconstruction Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain Proposed Hydrant + * , 0 --r-' 7 o .po~ ~.........o..' - + -~.......... ... ~- ' \ *,0 - ~o \& -/ }d 0 o~ V~'UII!..'It' .:; \ '\ \ + '\ ~ + ~ i '::/ + A WSB 350 Westwood Lake Olliat 8441 Wayzala IloIAevMI Minneapolis, UN !i5426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Alternate 1 City of Shorewood, Minnesota WSB Project No. 1169.00 Date: Jan. 6, 2000 812-541-4lll) &Associal&r. Inc. FAXS41-11l11l. INFRASTRUCnJRE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Attachment 1 t:\ 1169.00\feas\roYised_ion_OO\fig-07.dgn . + ......- . o 100 lGD SCALE 1"= 250' + ~~ , " u' EXISTING ... IUERMAIH -Tt ~ , Q. ~ 0 \ + -~-"-~-.l ---:-,,- ~(' \ \ \ \ \ ~ + ~,(:-:-: , ~~qlb:'1..I" (30" Jv r~~~~'~~ l \ _-. '. -\r~~~E;oEXISTING OQ-~' --- I -~l""'t . , , , c , " Legend c::J Driveway Reconstruction _ Park Reconstruction I''''~I Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements c::J Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain &+- Proposed Hydrant A WSB 350 ~ Lake Oftice 84411Nayzata BouIevanI M'meapaliI. MN 55426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Alternate 2 City of Shorewood, Minnesota WS8 Project No. 1169.00 Dale: JaR. 6, 2000 812-541_ tlbsoc-.lnt:. FAX541-17llO INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS . Pl.ANNERS Attachment 2 li\ 1169,OO'\'eu\reyised_jon_OO\fig.a... .. A WSB ~~ ,......~ .a. SCALE 1 "= 250' + + , " u' EXISTING .- IATEAMAIN -11 ~ , - ~. ._0, r + -. "'~-.l ------;,;.,..., ~.. + -~r:~ \ \ \ \ Jv \ r \\/l!'~'~~ \ SHOREWOOD FONDS DEV~PMENT ; l \ ~ ___ YE~~~E;OEXISTlNG :t o;;-~, ,W~_ I --1- Q ~~ i ~ ~ \, " [:=J - f..~1 [:=J Legend Driveway Reconstruction Park Reconstruction Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain Proposed Hydrant &+- 350 Weslwoad Lake Oftice 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work WS8 Project No. 1169.00 812-541_ tl bsocitJlu, Jnc. FAX 541-17llO INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS Alternate 3 City of Shorewood, Minnesota tl\ 1169.QO\feas\revised_jon_OO\ftg-12.dgn , U~b:""'I" DaIe:.l$t. 6. 2000 Attachment 3 2000 Water and Utility Improvements City Project Number: 99-02 for the CITY OF SHOREWOOD WSB Proj. No. 1169.00 Submitted to: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 January 10,2000 .. WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 612-541-4800 & Associates, Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS ~ ~~Q ~~~ 1S:~ ~;:::~ c::. .::.. ::- ~.,,! c::. Q. ~ ~ ~~ ~ c::. c::. c::. :"':l~ .... I O\n" ~.::;.'~ ~.... III ~"l:l~ Cl ... ~fl Q.~ !j 'P!'oo ~~ Cl i ~ tl' QclJw ~ ~~~~ ""'" ;:"""'~; ~~~~~f'.I... 31 ~~~~i~ -"0 oIll..~~~~~ ~ ~~::::~~~ ~ """'oIll..~S'Q..~ ~ ~!:~~~Eo Q.. ~Qc~~~~ ~ ~ ~ =: ~ ~ o. ~J~~~C~ ~ ~~~;: O\~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ""'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t;3 ~ >:i ~Q~~ ~~~~ ;g~~~ ~~~~ ~Q~~ ~~~~ . ~-=~ 'CC~Q 'jQ~C~ ~'-iI~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RoI'~ !I~~ ... wss ~ & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 January 10, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 Re: Feasibility Report Water and Utility Improvements City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a revised feasibility report which identifies several options, along with their feasibility, for the extension ofwatermain from Smithtown Road to the southern end of Eureka Road in the vicinity of the development project. The report identifies three feasible alternatives for the extension of watermain and associated costs, along with recommendations for each alternative for the Council's information and review. We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please don't hesitate to contact me at (612) 541-4800 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WS..'B. & A~SO.C. .ate~s, Inc. 7;J If ....-- ~;'$ Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Project Manager Enclosure nmlkd Minneapolis · St. Cloud Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11U/ ~ Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Date: January 10,2000 CitJ'-t![Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Reg. No. 19103 - ...... 1tJ($8 .. .4m>c1al<., Inc. . TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e.. . . . . . . . 3 2.1 Authorization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3 Data Available .............................................. 3 3. GENERAL BACKGROUND ..................... e.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1 Project Location ............................................ 5 3.2 Existing Conditions .......................................... 5 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .................................... 8 4.1 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.2 Watermain Extension ......................................... 8 4.2.1 Alternative 1 8 4.2.2 Alternative 2 11 4.2.3 Alternative 3 11 4.3 Private Utilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.4 Permits / Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14 4.5 Right-of-Way I Easements ................................... 14 5. F.INANCING .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . 15 5.1 Opinion of Probable Project Cost ............................. 15 5.1.1 Alternative 1) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park 15 5.1.2 Alternative 2) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park 15 5.1.3 Alternative 3) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park to Smith town Road 15 5.2 Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17 6.1 Schedule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION......................... 18 APPENDIX A OPINION OF COST ............................................. 19 City of Shorewood . Water and UtUity Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 .-- ~S8 .. .4m>c/QI<., Inc. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This feasibility report addresses two alternatives for providing municipal water service to the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and Trunk Highway (TH) 7 intersection. The recent completion of the infrastructure for the Shorewood Ponds development further stretches the fire flow capacity of the inplace watermain system to this area. This feasibility report identifies three alternatives to address the water flow needs of this area. The alternatives reflected in this report address various levels of street, driveway, and city park reconstruction necessary to extend watermain to this area, depending on the alternative chosen. The following is a brief description of the alternatives studied. Alternative 1 considers the extension of a 12-inch trunk watermain adjacent to the westerly boundary of Shore wood Ponds (southeast corner of Freeman Ballfield 2), north along Reutiman Lane, along Freeman Ballfields 4 and 5, and ultimately north through the private roadway of Eureka Way. Connection would be made to the existing 8-inch watermain which was extended to the westerly property boundary of the Smithtown Meadows project. While this alignment provides for increased flow rates for fire protection within the Shorewood Ponds development, it does not provide for a true looped system to the Shorewood Ponds development. This alternative would not provide watermain along Eureka Road to facilitate water service and fire protection to any residents along Eureka Road. Alternative 2 considers the extension of 12-inch trunk watermain from the intersection of Park Drive and Eureka Road, north along the west ditch of Eureka Road, past Reutiman Lane through Freeman Park, paralleling the proposed sanitary sewer extension to be completed as a part of the Freeman Park Multi-Purpose Building improvements, and then north along Freeman Ballfield 3, and ultimately north through the private roadway of Eureka Way. Connection would be made to the existing 8-inch watermain which was extended to the westerly property boundary of the Smithtown Meadows proj ect. City of Shorewood · Water and Utility lmprovements____ Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00tPage 1 -~- ~~8 & As_lates, Inc, This alignment provides true looping of the water system with connections to three dead- end lines, increased fire protection within the Shorewood Ponds development, and would make it possible to provide water service along approximately 1,100 feet of Eureka Road at some future time. Alternative 3 is essentially the same alignment as Alternative 2 with the proposed extension of the 12-inch watermain approximately 500 feet farther north from its proposed connection to the inplace 8-inch line just west of Smithtown Way and connecting to the existing 16-inch trunk line along Smithtown Road. This alternative would provide the City with a true trunk supply line to this area and would over double the volume of flow to the water system in this area of the City. The probable project costs range from $361,500 to $389,000, depending on the alternative chosen by the City Council. These project costs do not include land acquisition costs, which will vary depending on the project selected by the City Council. The watermain extension would be funded with fees collected from the Shorewood Ponds development and by the City's General Water Fund. City of ShDrewDDd . Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project ND. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 2 ---. - W$8 & As_es, Inc, 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization The Director of Public Works authorized the preparation of a Feasibility Report to address the water system needs for the Boulder Bridge-Badger field water system and the proposed Shorewood Ponds development in the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and TH 7. This project has been designated as City Project No. 99-02. 2.2 Scope This report considers three feasible alternatives available for providing municipal water service extension from Smithtown Road and extending it southerly to the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and TH 7. With the soon-to-be-completed Shorewood Ponds development, the current watermain system serving this area will not be capable of providing proper fire flow capacity. Therefore, this report considers three options of increasing the fire flow capacity along with providing additional watermain looping of the system in this area of the City. The primary project impetus is to provide municipal water service to the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and TH 7 intersection in order to serve the proposed Shorewood Ponds development, provide a needed watermain looping of the Shorewood Oaks watermain system, and increase fire flow capacities to this area. Currently, the homes along Eureka Road and Shorewood Ponds development are connected to the City's sanitary sewer and water system, with the exception of the residents along Eureka Road, whose water is supplied by individual private wells. 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: · City of Shorewood record plans for Eureka Road · City of Shorewood one-foot topography maps City of Shorewood - Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project ND. 99-02 WSB Project ND. 1169.00 Page 3 -. W$8 .. Anoctt1t<I, Inc, · City of Shorewood watermain layout map · Developer's plan for the Shorewood Ponds development City olShorewood · Water and Utility Improvements ... FeasibUit)' Report - Cit)' Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 4 . ~S8 & .4noc14te" Inc. 3. GENERAL BACKGROUND 3.1 Project Location (See Figure 1) The proposed project lies in the southwesterly portion of the City between Smithtown Road and TH 7 and just west of Eureka Road. The project proposes to extend watermain from Smithtown Way southerly through Freeman Park and connect into an existing 8- inch watermain within the Shorewood Ponds development. 3.2 Existing Conditions The project area is located mainly within Freeman Park itself with wooded private property bordering the northern portion of the project area. Freeman Park is a heavily- used recreational area in the summer months for baseball, soccer, and other outdoor recreation activities. The playing fields are irrigated by an underground irrigation system. 3.2.1 Watermain: Currently, two separate 6-inch lines extend easterly from the Shorewood Oaks subdivision. One line extends into the middle of Freeman Park, and the other has been extended to serve the Shorewood Ponds development. 3.2.2 Sanitary Sewer: Currently, no sanitary sewer serves the park; however, the City proposes to extend a sewer line from Eureka Road west into the park to serve the new Freeman Park multi-purpose park building in 2000. Sanitary sewer does exist down the centerline of Eureka Road as well as within the Shorewood Ponds development. The two private residences that border the north end of the project are currently served by their own private septic systems. 3.2.3 Drainage: The project area surface drains to the west/northwest to an existing drainage swale, which then drains northerly toward Lake Minnetonka. The project area is served by drainage culverts, and no storm sewer is present. City of Shorewood · Water and UtUity Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 5 -- ... ~S8 & hIDCI4te" Inc. Spray Island ..........----- Lake Minnetonka Upper Lake lD => d RIDGE POIN" CIR. Mar; La RD. ~ Tamarack (( ( ('\ ~~ Lake -.. WSB Wat~!_and Utility Improvements Project Location Map City of Shorewood, Minnesota WSB Project No. 1169.00 Date: Jan. 6, 2000 350 Weetwood Lake Oftice 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minne8poIis, MN 55426 Figure Number 1 c1An_,lnc. INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS e12-541-'18OO FAX 541-1700 PLANNERS t: \ 1169,00\ feos\revised_jon_OO\fig-Ol.dgn 3.2.4 Trees: Woods exist along the northern and eastern border of the park, which creates construction concerns for tree impacts. Special construction techniques such as directional boring to the north would minimize impacts to a majority of the trees in this area. However, a few trees within the park will be impacted by this project where directional boring is not practical. The trees anticipated to be impacted are not significant trees in size. The utility alignments would be adjusted to minimize tree impacts to the extent feasible. 3.2.5 Sidewalks I Trails: Bituminous trails exist within the limits of Freeman Park today. Trails impacted by construction would be reconstructed to their original configuration. No new trails are proposed with this project. City 0/ Shorewood · Water and UtUity Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 7 . ~S8 cf .4nocIat.., Inc. 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 General Three feasible alternatives for the extension of watermain trunk line from Smithtown Road southerly to the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and TH 7 are presented in this report. 4.2 Watermain Extension 4.2.1 Alternative 1 (See Figures 2 and 3) This alternative consists of the extension of 12-inch trunk watermain adjacent to the westerly boundary of Shore wood Ponds (southeast corner of Freeman Ballfield 2), north along Reutiman Lane, along Freeman Ballfields 4 and 5, and ultimately north through the private roadway of Eureka Way. Connections to existing dead-end watermains at Smithtown Way and at Freeman Park would be made. Alternative 1 would provide looping of the watermain system to the Shorewood Oaks water system and increase fire flow capacity to the Shorewood Ponds development. This alternative, however, would not provide a watermain loop of the Shorewood Ponds development. The private driveway would be reconstructed and upgraded to a bituminous surface to Smithtown Road. This alternative would provide municipal water service to only the two adjacent homes along Eureka Way. The woods north of the park would be slightly impacted, along with the park itself, by this alternative. Impacts to the park would be the baseball and soccer fields' irrigation system and playing turf, along with the existing gravel service drive. Permanent and temporary easements would be required for the construction of this alternative through the private properties. No easements would be necessary through the park. t:i~o/ Shorewood . Water and UtililJ'-Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 8 . ~~8 cf .4noc_. Inc. It WATERMAIN 30':!: 10' PERMANENT EASEMENTS 10' PERMANENT EASEMENTS WORK AREA TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS 350 Weetwood Lake 0Ilice 8441 Waymta BoutevIIrd MIMIIlIPOIis, loiN 55426 812-641-400 & A..,ocIotu, I"" FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS t:\ 1169.00\ feas\revised jan_OO\fig.08.dqn - - - -r:.=. -=- -=. --=. --=. --=. --=- --=-. --=- - -=-- -=- -.=..-.::.-..=...- -=--.=...-=: == == == == == == == == -=::..= STOCK PILE AREA -.a. WSB -===== ===-..::.r-..::.-..::.-..::.-..::.-..::.-..::.-..::.-=- T-== =====::::1-- 1 ~ 7.5' MIN 6" TOPSOIL COVER SOD OR SEEO MULCH & FERILIZER 11'2 F&I DIP WATERMAIN _ Eureka Road Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Typical Section - Alternate 1 and 2 City of Shorewood, Minnesota WSB project No. 1169.00 Date:Jan. 6, 2000 Figure Number 2 ~~ '- 10..1"'"_ , Q____________'.<?9____ 200 SCALE 1"= 250' + - - - .l/'?"I Legend Driveway Reconstruction Park Reconstruction Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain Proposed Hydrant + * IN + . WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzala Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work wse Project No. 1169.00 Date: Jan. 6. 2000 612-541-4800 & Associates. Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Alternate 1 City of Shorewood, Minnesota Figure Number 3 t: \ 1169 .00\ feas 'revised _ jan_aO\ fig. 0 7.dgn 4.2.2 Alternative 2 (See Figures 2 and 4) This alternative consists of the extension of 12-inch trunk watermain from the intersection of Park Drive and Eureka Road, north along the west ditch of Eureka Road to Freeman Park, paralleling the proposed sanitary sewer extension to be completed as a part of the Freeman Park Multi-Purpose Building improvements, and ultimately north through the private roadway of Eureka Way. Connections to existing dead-end watermains at Smithtown Way and within Freeman Park would be made, along with a connection to existing watermain within the Shorewood Ponds development, providing a true watermain looping to this area of the City. The private driveway would be reconstructed and upgraded to a bituminous driveway to Smithtown Road. This alternative could provide municipal water service to the two adjacent properties along the private driveway and to three properties along Eureka Road. Also, it could provide fire protection for about 50 percent of the homes along Eureka Road. The woods north of Freeman Park would be impacted slightly, along with the park itself. Impacts to the park would be limited to turf restoration outside of the ballfield and play areas, which would not impact the use of the playing fields during or after construction. The proposed watermain alignment would be along the west ditch line of Eureka Road, thereby limiting impact to Eureka Road itself. Permanent and temporary easements would be required for the construction of this option through the private properties. No easements would be necessary through the park, nor along Eureka Road. 4.2.3 Alternative 3 (See Figures 2 and 5) Alternative 3 follows the same alignment as Alternative 2 with the 12-inch trunk watermain proposed to be extended 500 feet farther north along Eureka Way to Smithtown Road with a connection to the existing 16-inch trunk watermain there. This alternative provides an opportunity for the City to substantially increase the fire flow capacity to this area by providing a true 12-inch trunk line connection to the 16-inch trunk in Smithtown Road. City of Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 11 . ~S8 & .4#octaIel, [TIC. ( , ~~lm~Ii...IN - - .. Legend Driveway Reconstruction Park Reconstruction Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain Proposed Hydrant * . WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work WSB Project No. 1169.00 Date: Jan. 6, 2000 612-541-4800 & Associates, 1m:. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Alternate 2 City of Shorewood, Minnesota Figure Number 4 t:\ 1169.00\feos\revised_ion_OO\ fig-l1.dgn ( ~~ ~ ---;-00 2~ SCALE 1 "= 250' + + o 0 80 o o 000 -I<> , ~~lm~Ii...IN - - .. IBIII Legend Driveway Reconstruction Park Reconstruction Permanent Drainage & Utility Easements Temporary Construction Easements Proposed Watermain Proposed Hydrant * . WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Eureka Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work WSB Project No. 1169.00 Date: Jan. 6, 2000 612-541-4800 & Associales. Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Alternate 3 City of Shorewood, Minnesota Figure Number 5 t:\ 1169.00\feas\revised_jan_OO\ fig-12.dgn 4.3 Private Utilities The project area contains overhead electrical power by Northern States Power (NSP), .. plione service by US West, gas service by Minnegasco, aria cable television by Paragon Cable. 4.4 Permits / Approvals Permits for this project would be required from the Department of Health for the watermain and possibly from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for the surface water runoff within the project area. A permit from Hennepin County would be required for Option 1 for construction work and utilities within the County trail right-of- way. Also, a general storm water permit "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Permit Program" (NPDES) would be required for all options. 4.5 Right-of-Way / Easements All three alternatives would require a 20-foot wide permanent utility easement, along with temporary easements from the private properties which the watermain would be constructed along. The properties requiring easements are located north of the limits of Freeman Park along the private road, Eureka Way. No additional easements beyond these properties would be needed. City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 14 . 1tJ(~8 cl AnocIate', Inc. 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Probable Project Cost A detailed opinion of probable project cost for each alternative can be found in Appendix A of this report. The opinion of probable construction cost incorporates anticipated 2000 construction costs and includes a 10% contingency factor and related indirect costs. The indirect costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. The summary ofthe project cost for each option is as follows: 5.1.1 Alternative 1) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park A. Site Restoration ...................................................... 30% Indirect CAlsts $118,662.50 $0.00 $158,224.00 $1,237.50 $278,124.00 $f!3 437 20 $361,561.20 B. Sanitary Sewer ...................................................... C. Watermain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. Storm Sewer I Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal Construction Costs Total Project Cost 5.1.2 Alternative 2) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park A. Site Restoration .................................................... 30% Indirect Costs $84,738.50 $0.00 $197,890.00 $1,518.00 $284,146.50 $85 243 95 $369,390.45 B. Sanitary Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Water Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. Storm Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal Construction Costs Total Project Cost 5.1.3 Alternative 3) 12-Inch Watermain, Freeman Park to Smithtown Road A. Site Restoration .................................................... 30% Indirect Costs $84,738.50 $0.00 $212,740.00 $1,518.00 $298,996.50 $89698 95 B. Sanitary Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Water Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. Storm Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal Construction Costs Total Project Cost $388,695.45 City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No.1 169.00 Page 15 . 1tY$8 cl Anoctate.. Inc. 5.2 Funding Costs associated with the project are proposed to be funded with fees collected from the . Shorewood Ponds development and with funds from the City's General Water Fund. Funding scenarios for these alternatives are shown in the table below. ALTERNATIVE 1 Total Project Cost Shorewood Ponds Development Fees General Water Fund $361,561.20 $310,000.00 $51,561.20 ALTERNATIVE 2 Total Project Cost Shorewood Ponds Development Fees General Water Fund $369,390.45 $310,000.00 $59,390.45 ALTERNATIVE 3 Total Project Cost Shorewood Ponds Development Fees General Water Fund $388,695.45 $310,000.00 $78,695.45 Based on the above funding scenario, General Water Funds required will range from $51,561.20 to $78,695.45 depending on the alternative that is constructed. City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. J J 69.00 Page J 6 ... 1tY$8 Ii .4.r1OClate.. Inc. 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The project schedule is dependent upon the preferred option chosen by the City. The following schedules are based on a faster than normal design process' and that a decision by the City Council can be reached on January 10,2000. 6.1 Schedule Order Feasibility Report ...................................... April, 1999 Receive Feasibility Report ................................ January 10,2000 Order Plans and Specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. January 10,2000 Approve Plans and Specifications / Order Ad for Bid ............ March 13, 2000 Receive Bids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. April 19, 2000 Award Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. April 24, 2000 Begin Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 10,2000 Substantial Construction Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 30, 2000 City of Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page17 ... ItY-SS & .4.rlOClatel, Inc. 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION City Project No. 99-02 consists of the extension of trunk watermain service to the northwest quadrant ofTH 7 and Eureka Road, street and/or driveway rec6hstfuction, and appurtenant work as necessary for the completion of the project. In consideration of the need to provide trunk watermain service to the northwest quadrant of TH 7 and Eureka Road, we would recommend consideration of the three alternative alignments for the extension of the watermain system. Alternative 2 provides the City with a true looping of the watermain system not only to the Shorewood Ponds development, but also to the Smithtown Way and Shorewood Oaks areas watermain system. Alternative 3 provides the City the added benefit of providing a true 12-inch trunk line to serve this area. By extending the 12-inch watermain to Smithtown Road, the volume of water would more than double that which can be provided by its connection to the 8-inch stub located just west of Smith town Way. Based on our analysis, this project is feasible, necessary and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. We recommend that the City Council and Staff review the alternatives presented in this report and weigh the benefits and impacts of each alternative before making a final decision. City of Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 18 .. ItYSS el.4noc/QIel, Inc. APPENDIX A OPINION OF COST City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 19 . ~S8 ci .4noc/QI.., Inc. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 1) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park (Local City Funds) A. Site Restoration I Mobilization Lump Sum $10,000.00 I $10,000.00 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) Lin Ft $3.00 25 $75.00 3 Subgrade Excavation CuYd $6.50 500 $3,250.00 4 Common Excavation CuYd $4.00 500 $2,000.00 5 Remove Bituminous Pavement SqYd $5.00 75 $375.00 6 Remove Culverts Lin Ft $8.00 75 $600.00 7 Salvage and Install Mailboxes Each $100.00 3 $300.00 8 Salvage and Install Signs Each $75.00 2 $150.00 9 Bit Path (Remove & Replace w/6" CL V, 2" SqYd $40.00 35 $1,400.00 10 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture Ton $65.00 100 $6,500.00 II Aggregate Base Class 5 Ton $10.00 1300 $13,000.00 12 Geotextile Fabric SqYd $2.00 1000 $2,000.00 13 Clear and Grub Tree $400.00 25 $10,000.00 14 Topsoil Borrow CuYd $7.50 2350 $17,625.00 15 Seeding Acre $1,500.00 2 $3,000.00 16 Sod SqYd $2.50 13500 $33,750.00 17 Temporary Fence Lin Ft $3.00 750 $2,250.00 18 Silt Fence, Type Heavy Duty LinFt $3.00 500 $1,500.00 19 Bale Check Each $10.00 10 $100.00 Subtotal $107,875.00 10% Contingencies $10,787.50 Subtotal Construction Costs $118,662.50 B. Sanitary Sewer $0.00 City of Shorewood · Water and UtUity Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 20 A. ~~8 <f Anoclat... Inc. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 1) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park (Local City Funds) C. Watermain Hydrant, 6" GV & Box, Lead and Tee Each $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00 2 Repair Irrigation Lump Sum $5,000.00 I $5,000.00 3 Connect to Existing Watermain Each $500.00 3 $1,500.00 4 Wet Tap with Valve 16" x 12" Each $3,500.00 $3,500.00 5 12" GV and Box Each $1,000.00 5 $5,000.00 6 12" DIP CL 52 LinFt $24.00 2710 $65,040.00 7 12" Direction Bore LinFt $65.00 510 $33,150.00 8 Ductile Iron Fittings Lb $1.50 15000 $22,500.00 9 1" CORP STOPS Each $50.00 3 $150.00 10 I" Curb Stop & Box Each $100.00 3 $300.00 II I" Type "K" Copper LinFt $10.00 150 $1,500.00 12 Granular Foundation Material CuYd $6.00 300 $1,800.00 Subtotal $143,840.00 10% Contingencies $14,384.00 Subtotal Construction Costs $158,224.00 D. Storm Sewer F&I 15" CMP Culverts LinFt $15.00 75 $1,125.00 $1,125.00 $112.50 $1,237.50 Subtotal 10% Contingencies Subtotal Construction Costs Total Construction Costs 30% Indirect Costs $278,124.00 $83,437.20 $361,561.20 Grand Total Construction Costs City of Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements FeasibUity Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 21 ... W~8 Ii AnocIateJ. Inc. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 2) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park (Local City Funds) Item A. Site Restoration Mobilization Lump Sum $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2 Remove Culverts Lin Ft $8.00 20 $160.00 3 Salvage & Install Mailboxes Each $100.00 6 $600.00 4 Salvage & Install Signs Each $75.00 4 $300.00 5 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture Ton $30.00 200 $6,000.00 6 Aggregate Base, Class 5 Ton $10.00 500 $5,000.00 7 Clearing and Grubbing Each $400.00 25 $10,000.00 8 Topsoil Borrow CuYd $7.50 2350 $17,625.00 9 Seeding Acre $1,500.00 4.5 $6,750.00 10 Sod SqYd $2.50 6000 $15,000.00 II Temporary Fence LinFt $3.00 750 $2,250.00 12 Silt Fence, Type Heavy Duty Lin Ft $3.00 1000 $3,000.00 13 Bale Check Each $10.00 35 $350.00 Subtotal $77,035.00 10% Contingencies $7,703.50 Subtotal Construction Costs $84,738.50 B. Sanitary Sewer $0.00 City of Shorewood . Water and UtUity Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 22 .. WS8 .. .bsoc/QteJ. Inc. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 2) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park (Local City Funds) Item Description Unit Unit Cost C. Watermain Hydrant, 6" G.V. & Box Lead and Tee 2 Connect to Existing Watermain 3 Wet Tap with Valve 16" x 12" 4 6" Valve and Box 5 8" Valve and Box 6 12" Valve and Box 7 6" DIP CL 52 Watermain 8 8" DIP CL 52 Watermain 9 12" DIP CL 52 Watermain 10 12" Direction Bore II Ductile Iron Fittings 12 I" Corporation Stop 13 I" Curb Stop and Box 14 I" Type K" Copper 15 Directional Bore I" Service 16 Granular Foundation Material Each $2,200.00 Each $500.00 Each $3,500.00 Each $450.00 Each $600.00 Each $1,000.00 LinFt $17.00 Lin Ft $19.00 Lin Ft $26.00 LinFt $65.00 Lb $1.50 Each $50.00 Each $100.00 LinFt $10.00 Lin Ft $30.00 CuYd $6.00 0.v Total Cost 4 $8,800.00 3 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 8 4 6 200 550 3500 250 15000 4 4 150 180 500 10lJf, Contingencies Subtotal Subtotal Construction Costs City of Shorewood . Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 23 $3,600.00 $2,400.00 $6,000.00 $3,400.00 $10,450.00 $91,000.00 $16,250.00 $22,500.00 $200.00 $400.00 $1,500.00 $5,400.00 $3,000.00 $179,900.00 $17,990.00 $197,890.00 ~ 1tY~8 " Anoclak.. Irrc. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .,., .,., ~~lli 0 0 ~ ~ .,., 0\ ~ 0 0 ~ llC:i llC:i 'CS ~ ~ "" "" 0Cl ~ :;; ~ 0\ '" 00 ~ ;; ..... '" ~ fA fA ~ ~ ~ .,.; 0\ ~ ~ ~ 'C ~ ~ - tl ~ t; ~ .'3 \0 "" S "i;l '" '" '" M N S ~ a a a a ~ c;o I: I: l:l I: ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "tj ~ "tj I: ::: g g ~ 0 a .t: .:;; ~ '" '" ~ '" '" '" ~ II: I: I: - M ~ a a ~ a fA fA ..... ~ - - - .... s s s "" a s ~ ~ ~ i ~ J! ~ ~ II:: ~ ~ I: ~ ~ II:: l:! !:IE ~ ~ c:: c:: (.:) 1~1 ;J ;J ~e~C'\ b ~~~ cS 0 ~E...~ a II:: -... ~ ... ~ b~ Q ~ .... .... l;I'j ~ ~ .s:c ~.~ ~::5 b~ ;: "" ~.... b ~ .'3 .. 0.... ~ ~~ 0 fi .s ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ e rt i t~ ~ '.. ....J.. =- .~ ,00\ .... ti :Si c:S !:I . tl< s;;::; E ~ '5 l~ ~ > "'3 ~ '~ ~ u .. e c:a.. ~Q.O~ ~ ::;E c:a.. ~ s-~ u ~ u ~ ..~'C ""'l t . ..... ;r, ;;". ll:"": ~ ~ - N ~~~ ~ ; eo ~ ~ ~ .. Ilc: l:l ~ tI. tI. ~ o'~ s ~,... c:l .E tIj ::::(~ ~ I 'Q-oQ '" N 't; !lQ ~ ..... i::S ,s ~~ ~ ~ .:::; ~~ Q.O Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 3) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park to Smithtown Road (Local City Funds) A. Site Restoration Mobilization Lump Sum SIO,OOO.OO SIO,OOO.OO 2 Remove Culverts Lin Ft $8.00 20 $160.00 3 Salvage & Install Mailboxes Each $100.00 6 $600.00 4 Salvage & Install Signs Each S75.00 4 $300.00 5 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture Ton S30.00 200 $6,000.00 6 Aggregate Base, Class 5 Ton $10.00 500 $5,000.00 7 Clearing and Grubbing Each $400.00 25 $10,000.00 8 Topsoil Borrow CuYd $7.50 2350 $17,625.00 9 Seeding Acre $1,500.00 4.5 $6,750.00 10 Sod SqYd $2.50 6000 $15,000.00 11 Temporary Fence LinFt S3.00 750 $2,250.00 12 Silt Fence, Type Heavy Duty LinFt $3.00 1000 $3,000.00 13 Bale Check Each $10.00 35 $350.00 Subtotal $77,035.00 10% Contingency $7,703.50 Subtotal Construction Costs $84,738.50 B. Sanitary Sewer $0.00 City of Shorewood . Water and UtUity Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 25 ... ~~8 cl .4.uoc1ate., [tIC. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 3) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park to Smithtown Road (Local City Funds) 1!otaftfJost C. Watermain Hydrant, 6" G.V. & Box Lead and Tee Each $2,200.00 4 S8,800.00 2 Connect to Existing Watermain Each S500,OO 4 S2,OOO.00 3 Wet Tap with Valve 16" x 12" Each S3,500.00 S3,500.00 4 6" Valve and Box Each S450.00 8 $3,600.00 5 8" Valve and Box Each S600.00 4 S2,400.00 6 12" Valve and Box Each SI,OOO.OO 6 $6,000.00 7 6" DIP CL 52 Watermain Un Ft S17.00 200 $3,400.00 8 8" DIP CL 52 Watermain Un Ft S19.00 550 SIO,450.00 9 12" DIP CL 52 Watermain Un Ft S26.00 4000 S104,OOO.00 10 12" Direction Bore LinFt S65.00 250 SI6,250.00 11 Ductile Iron Fittings Lb S1.50 15000 S22,500.00 12 1" Corporation Stop Each $50.00 4 $200.00 13 I " Curb Stop and Box Each SIOO.OO 4 $400.00 14 I" Type UK" Copper LinFt $10.00 150 SI,500.00 15 Directional Bore I" Service LinFt $30.00 180 S5,400.00 16 Granular Foundation Material CuYd S6.00 500 $3,000.00 Subtotal $193,400.00 10% Contingencies $19,340.00 Subtotal Construction Costs $212,740.00 City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 26 ... tY~8 cl .48.oc_. Inc. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Water & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-02 Alternative 3) 12" Watermain, Freeman Park to Smithtown Road (Local City Funds) D. Storm Sewer F & I 15" CMP Culvert Lin Ft $15.00 $35.00 36 24 2 F & I 24" RCP LinFt Subtotal 10% Contingencies Subtotal Construction Costs Total Construction Costs 30% Indirect Costs Grand Total Construction Cost City of Shorewood · Water and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-02 WSB Project No. 1169.00 Page 27 Total Cost $540.00 $840.00 $1,380.00 $138.00 $1,518.00 $298,996.50 $89,698.95 $388,695.45 ... 1tl~8 4 .4nocfatu. 1.... .- . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.uS.cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen, Acting City Administrator Larry Brown, Oirector of Public Works ~ January 5, 2000 FROM: . DATE: RE: Discussion Regarding the Gideon's Glen Wetland Delineation Report Included in the City Council packet is the Wetland Delineation Report for the Gideon's Glen Project in the vicinity of County Road 19 and Glen Road. Refer to Attachment 1 for the site location map. Staff has been working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Hennepin County Division of Environmental Services to review the subject site and determine the feasibility of expanding the existing wetlands to provide public value credits similar to wetland banking. Additional wetland capacity win also aid in the treatment of runoff, which ultimately flows to Lake Minnetonka. . Currently, Mr. Tom Sims owns the property. Mr. Sims has had minor interest in the property for development. As such, would be developers for the property conducted a wetland delineation report of their own. Mr. Sims shared a copy of the report to the City's consultant at the time the City's delineation was being performed. Even though staff had knowledge that a wetland delineation report had been drafted for Mr. Sims, both City Staff and representatives from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District felt it best to complete a separate delineation. On October 6th and 8th of 1999, representatives from WSB and Associates analyzed the site and performed a wetland delineation. Attachment 2 shows three shaded areas that indicate the presence of wetlands. Wetland 1 is located south of the existing parking lot for the apartment complex. This wetland is shown to be 0.589 acres in area. The delineation report prepared for Mr. Sims indicates an area of 0.32 acres. This wetland has no standing water, but has a very high water table immediately below the surface soil. no ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ... ~g , .... Mayor and City Council Gideon's Glen Wetland Delineation Report January 5, 2000 Page 2 of2 Wetland 2 is a larger wetland located in the southwest quadrant of Glen Road and County Road 19. This wetland is shown to be 0.730 acres in area. This was not delineated as part of the Sims delineation. While this site is known to have standing water at times, at the time of delineation open water was not observed. However, high groundwater levels were also observed immediately below the surface vegetation. Wetland 3 is a smaller wetland that was appears to be originally part of wetland 2 presumably prior to the development of the apartment complex. This wetland is being used as a treatment basin for runoff from the parking lot of the apartment complex. The report documents that all of the wetlands fall under the jurisdiction of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. However, none of the three wetlands are protected by the DNR. . Staff has also learned that a technical evaluation panel (TEP) has reviewed the Sims wetland delineation of Wetland 1. The TEP is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and has verified the findings of the boundary provided in the Sims delineation. Because wetland delineation is not an exact science, staff is recommending that the findings of the TEP stand, and that the area of Wetland 1 is to be noted as 0.32 acres. As it turns out, the smaller area may benefit the project in calculating public value credits if a successful project is to occur. Having the delineation report in hand, staff is proceeding with obtaining an appraisal for the subject property. Once an appraisal has been completed, concept designs will be derived to aid in the determination of estimated project costs and alternative funding sources available, versus the proposed benefit. . If found acceptable, a motion accepting the Wetland Delineation Report prepared by WSB and Associates for the Gideon's Glen project would be in order. I\~ .l. .l.! .l. .l. '\ .l. . .. . l~l ~ .l. .l. -J>--j .l. .l. _ .l. e;, >.---'- · ~ ,~ r1 ~ IsIIE /~ ~ ft is D~lfv /~ I ! I I 1,:: I ~ II ~ 7 - ~ ~ L ~ ~ is ~ f ~ I J~ ING .-J - SlAR 1'-- 'I I~ ~- ~ ~R r--~ ~1lT ~VE ~ ~ f-0! _ r--- ~ OIAI~ L ---t;- -L- r-- .!lA (J') r--- - I-- ~ -- - - - I ~ - (.l. .l. ~ /j;' ~ Q C":l - ::::- ~ .l.1 ~ ~ ...... \IN LA c ...... - l....- I JL'l ------l \ '- _ ~ t BdTl'P I, I H r [ 0 ^ \ '= -I North ~H 9 ~MI~~IRj~~ \ ~b--~[I II~A\irtments f- r- ::;:::~/%:(:::::::?:::: ... c '"-- ; Jel n lf~ore~ ~~rrfOW ~ RD I l[j 5':) '-- ::s !;QU ~ c 0 ~ ~ ~ U L >- ~ => ,.t. 8 - I ~ "'~ ./ r r ~ - I' :-.; . ~ t-~ e ..::: . ~ ~ ~ + . -...., i I ) r/ . I , If , . I ..: II . + . I .:.31J H' 31'f:lS . , ........ 'lO1 O. .. .. =- I . ~ + + . ;( -,:.~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ o c.. Q) ~ = o . .... ~ m Q) = . .... ...... Q) ~ ~ = m ...... ~ ~ Glen Road Vicinity Prepared for: The City of Shorewood December 1999 ~c ~~ ~ Prepared by: Jeffrey L. Lutz WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 tel: 612-541-4800 fax: 612-541-1700 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 tel: 612-541-4800 ~ WSB & Associates. Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT for GLEN ROAD VICINITY Prepared for: The City of Shorewood December 1999 Prepared by: Jeffrey L. Lutz WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Phone: (612) 541-4800 Fax: (612) 541-1700 Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 .. WS8 d:bJDcltJln,JIfC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents I. Introduction .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . I A. Project Location ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I B. Project Purpose ............................................. I II. Delineation Procedure '" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I A. Base Map Review ........................................... I B. Site Review and Climatology Information ........................ 2 C. Delineation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. Results and Wetland Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 IV. Regulatory Analysis .................................................3 V. References................................................,.......... 4 Appendix A: Appendix B: U.S.G.S. Quad C, NWI, DNR, and Soils Map Delineation Maps Appendix C: Delineation Data Sheets Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 . .. WS8 4"-""" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. Introduction A. Project Location WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) prepared this Wetland Delineation Report for the City of Shore wood. The approximate six-acre site is located in NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 33, T. 117 N., R 23 W., Excelsior Quadrangle (Appendix A). B. Project Purpose The obj ective of this wetland delineation to identify and delineate all jurisdictional wetlands on the approximate six-acre site. The purpose of the wetland delineation is to determine the wetland edge to resolve drainage issues within the vicinity of the site. II. Delineation Procedure A. Base Map Review The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) was reviewed and one potential wetland was identified on site. The DNR Protected W atersand Wetlands Map was reviewed, and no DNR wetlands were identified within the project area. Soil survey information from Hennepin County was reviewed. The soils map for the area indicated hydric soils within the project area. Some of the wetland areas were not mapped as having hydric soils. Table 1 outlines the type of soils identified in the soil survey and similar soils identified on-site. Refer to Appendix A for the Hennepin County Soil Surveymap. Table 1 On-Site Soils Drainage High Water Table CapabilitY Soil Type Temp. Class Depth Months Critical Phase Class Criteria *G1encoe Mesic VP 1.0 to -0.5 Oct. - July Drained 2W Comic Undrained 5W Haplaquolls *Hamel Mesic P 0.5 to 1.5 Nov. - June All 3W Typic Argioqualls Lester Mesic WD 5 ----- ----- ----- Mollie Hapludalfs > LeSeur Mesic MWD 3 ----- ----- ----- Aqua Argioquolls *Hydric soils of the United States/Hydric Soils of Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 ' ... WSB Page 1 cI~1nc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Site Review and Climatology Information The wetland delineations were completed during the first week of October, 1999. The annual monthly rainfall report for the Minneapolis/St. Paul indicated that the area had received 4.55",2.64", and 2.73"ofrain during the months ofJuly, August, and September, respectively. c. Delineation The wetlands were classified according to the methodologies set forth in "Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States" (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Cowardin et al.), arid "Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States." (USFWS Circular 39: Shaw and Fredine 1971). The wetland typesin this report are given by their Cowardin classification, followed by the Circular 39 classification. Soil types were researched prior to the on-site investigation with the assistance of the Soil Survey of Hennepin County, map sources and aerial photography. Soil colors were described on-site according to the "Munsell Soil Color Charts" (1994 Revised Edition) for sample points and test pits which were advanced in and adjacent to the identified wetlands. Vegetation was determined by on-site determination and, when necessary, with the assistance of plant identification manuals listed in Section V, References. Routine Wetland Delineation (1987 COE Wetland Delineation Manual) data forms were used to record vegetation, hydrology, and soils characteristics at sample points conducted in and adjacent to the wetland. The data forms for the sample points are found in Appendix C. III. Results and Wetland Information A total of three wetlands were identified and delineated October 6th and 8th , 1999. Each wetland is described below. Wetland 1 Cowardin: NWI-PF01C/PEMC; Actual- PSS1C/PEMC Circular 39: Type 6/2 Soil mapping: Hamel Wetland 1 is located on the south side of the investigation area, or directly south of the parking lot of the adjoining apartment complex. Wetland plant communities in Wetland A consisted of Canada Bluejoint Grass, Red Osier Dogwood, Black Ash, Silver Maple and Red Stem Aster. The upland consisted primarily of woods occupied primarily by Sugar Maple, Black Ash, Box Elder, Common Buckthorn, Sumac and various grasses. There was no standing water in any portion of Wetland 1. A soil pit (SP-3, Wetland 1) advanced at the approximate center of Wetland 1 indicated saturation within the first three inches. The advanced soil pit filled with water immediately. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 Page 2 ... WSB .. Auodmu. me. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Soil pits and test pits were advanced around the assumed wetland edge. The wetland soil at the approximate wetland edge was saturated within a few inches and, in most cases, had freestanding water at eighteen inches to twenty-four inches. In most cases, a determination of where to place the wetland edge was based on a lack of hydrology as soils and vegetation considered to occur in "hydric" conditions were occurring in upland area. Wetland 2 Cowardin: NWI-PFOlC/PEMC; Actual- PEMlB/PEMF Circular 39: Type 3 Soil mapping: Glencoe Wetland 2 is located on the north side of the investigation area and is bounded by the apartment complex grounds to the south and east, Glen Road and woods to the north, and woods to the west. Except for the west portion of the delineated wetland, the delineated wetland boundary to upland was separated by a steep two to three foot embankment. The west portion of the delineated wetland is a gradual transition to wooded upland. Wetland plant communities in Wetland 2 consisted of Narrow- leaved Cattail, Lesser Duckweed, and Canada Bluejoint Grass. The upland consisted of Sugar Maple, Black Ash, Common Buckthorn, Sumac and Large-tooth Aspen. The wetland soil was saturated at a depth of a few inches and contained a high content of organic material. In most cases, advanced soil borings and test pits filled with water immediately. Wetland 3 Cowardin: NWI-PFOlC/PEMC; Actual- PEMlB Circular 39: Type 2 Soil mapping: Glencoe , Wetland 3 was likely part of Wetland 2 prior to development of the apartment complex and associated grounds. This small wetland is developed along all wetland edges and has a wood constructed weir located on the north side. This wetland collects surface water from the apartment complex grounds prior to draining into Wetland 2. IV. Regulatory Analysis All delineated wetlands fall within the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Local Governinent.(LGU) through the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991. None of the wetlands identified in this report fall within the jurisdiction of the DNR. Ifportions of any of these wetlands are to be impacted, a permit will be required from the various agencies having jurisdiction over the wetland. The following table summarizes all of the wetlands identified and indicates the agencies having jurisdiction. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSBProject No.1 074.46 ... WSB Page 3 "~me. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 2 Summary of Wetland Type, Dominant Vegetation, and JurisdictiolJal Agencies Wetland Cowardin Circular 39 Dominant Vegetation Jurisdictional A2encies I PSSIC/PEMC Type 6/2 Canada Bluejoint Grass, LGU,USCOE B. Ash, Silver Maple, R.O. Dogwood 2 PEMIB/PEMF Type 3 Cattail, Canada LGU, USCOE Bluejoint Grass, Lesser Duckweed 3 PEMC Type 2 Cattail LGU,USCOE The USCOE generally requires mitigation of wetland impacts at a 1: 1 ratio. The WCA also requires a minimum mitigation ratio of 2:1 ratio in Hennepin County, provided that sequencing has been completed. Exemptions under the de minimis oftheWCA state that a replacement plan for wetlands is not required for up to 2000 ff of a Type 1,2, or 6 wetland or up to 400. fl? of any type wetland. v. References The following sources of information were reviewed to assist in performing the wetland delineation. Literature Sources · Board of Water and Soil Resources. 1996. Wetland Conservation Act Rules, Chapter 8420. Print Communication Division, St. Paul. · Cowardin L.M. USFWS, 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Carver, D.C. 131 pp. · Fasset,N.C. 1957. A Manual of Aquatic Plants. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 405 pp. · Hydric Soils of Minnesota. Revised December 15, 1995. · Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 1994 Revised Edition. Munsell Soil Color Charts. · National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. National Academy Press, Carver, D.C. 306 pp. · National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Carver, D.C. Misc. Publication 1491. Revised December 15, 1995. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 ... WSB Page 4 4AMoc1a1a,htc. I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · Reed, P.B. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands; North Central (Region 3). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. · Fredine C.G. and Shaw S.P. 1956 Wetlands of the United States (Circular 39). United States Government Printing Office, Carver, D.C. · United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report'Y-87-1. Waterways Experiment Station. · United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1974. Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 ... WSB Page 5 .~,.h:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 APPENDIX A U.S.G.S. Quad, NWI, DNR, and Soils Map ... WSB .~.htt:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 612-541-'1800 &Auoc/ates, Inc. FAX 541-171lO ~NFRASTRUCruRE - ENGINEERS -. PlANNERS Shorewood, Minnesota Glen Road Wetland Delineation City of Shorewood Date: October 15,1999 U.S.G.S Site Location I ~:. _ _ l:l ~ _ _.!_ - -.! - - U1- - - - - - - - ...... ~ . -f .~. N ... tl! I .. WATtiRTOWN It MI. J 7273 I IIIIN' r. ~~ . , _~ 1'\ \ ~ 'T . \.. .. T:"I.;>" Ad' \. T I ~ ..' <;I' IoI~NO 2 loll." (MOUNDI ' ) -' ~' '~ ~. . ...~. '~il-"" ~ '\ ,,',r '>(XIO:........::...J ..': .~? ,!J". 'D '., . '~" .\. " t ^'~ - I#"'I~' -,.,.. ~ Cl ' I I .,..... "'4.0' ',. _' . . ,If . '';x ;I.di 0 \\"', j r OJ '~ I :" I' ..0.---:.-._......... i I . '.::U- . ....J~. :1.1 ..: , : · , , .; :M ~ ~I\' ~:I?\I~' 'I-I~J< .....:'~ ~(-'~ ~<:i\. ! 5dJr..7f' '. .... ~..' ':::'...:\ '~\" . , '. " ~. .. '_t"'t,.~ ~. 0 "0' ~ r. ,.fi,....-::>::. . " ~/ I, . ,.tt.. ". ~:,..,,>-..~. ...' '..s-/.- :..., : . . \-- . , . .' .. ..., ......_ ".' b'" .-.. ... \ / I . :-, .......~: "~- :~ ~ ::-:.~~' ,l ,'~::~~ ~~~~_~ ~,~:l..~ ."' \~r '-::~;; ~ ~~ '. ~ _~~"'" "~:(cj:;I~' "":::Y'.:':-;";.:.' . '. Q _"~ "'--=:-~(!iIilr"'....4"::' ~.",. " cr--t; ! ,;...~ ."l~~ ow ~'J~~. . . -.-:r \ --- u. ...-s" ~." :7. '\"\ (';). '-.i'\1!Ir.. '" . jJ . ,.,,:- ~ j f/ : ~ .J ':! 14 ___.---:-":'~" ~... .t:,.' . . 0 ~. ~: ~ ~~ c'~ -;. " '.: 0 f I .....~~ .:. . - ~ (\ ~ ;;~'i') \ \'1 . ,. . " , t r ~ c, < ~ ~ .'. , . . is,'.iJ · ~ ' ;I1il - /i::'--j \ .. 0 . c.~ ~~ ~~ ,_'( (,(-.....;.- ~ It' Y i Cl ~~r' . ... '.' .:. ij 5j -' ~ 11 '~ "'-. Ii ~ \ .....' \ ~ \.: "; ~ \;','..../ >-. ..... j 1 v . .' -. '. "/. ,'n . -T"~ '/ "k> \ \."-;~,,, I -. r" ~.! ' I . ~. .. ~ :r"'-.. ~ . . I. /": I\) . . I!I, .' I "-..) '-~ "\ ',,::. (" '\ i~'. . .,r"";. , ,', ~ \. ~ tt:l . ", FT'~y /' .t .~ .,::,J ....." . C?\ ~ ) .\ \:'. ~', \8 . -. / ("l"'?.,. '. . ~', \ \ t"" t' t ~ ~,... ~ ~ ~ I, . '-...;.- ...~.~,.' H .: ~.J)} . '.:,~/! ...., ,~'" ,,'.' '1\ \ 0 \. I 0 c ~ . ~ ~1\)4, '. . ~ -, :''. , '. "'A: -.. "\. .n\l;I""1~' , \ ~ ~ . tiI:t \ . ~ I' 'J( , ' "'(P /..': ' , Of / . \.....,.:':~... ....--;- I' - II rJl ,'.' 0 to ;". /--~.. ;.' ~ ...... /1'. ..&..."'....~..i!. }..~ '~:. ~ _ 2: /" / -e, / . .,,~L"."I' "dJ/)1 ~\ -.'\-; II ;/ ~ '<tJ~,a. '. ."'~~ 1.....0 -- . / ,..-,.",' , "/J/ . T "\tli I \~~\ ~\;f.~'l~ul .,.: ?~. \ '00:" . ~'1' ~1~[~~":1; '~'Xf.... ~~~.,:~ ~'f'JO~-~/,~/.' \\~"/ ( ://~ -, ~~~ ~ .~~~:~, .- . .~""-- f:.; . ~ ,\\'1. ,1.J: ~ ! ."?lOlI --e.. ~/ ..../--:\ J \\ ~ A't~. ."l r-- 1r" .. ;:\II,. .',r. ~,-~./~'~!iid' ( Gif' I~' --......... ') A \ Il ,~ I",\~ !~I..... tiJ ~ f?- / ~j '~r -~~-.at '.J ;..:.- 5"~' ~/', ..: j r, ~.i, .\ri~ .! ~,.. ~::5{ / /"..--.~~~~ \ '; ,I <:5 ~ t:-tt". \! \i \ '. ({ ~ l!lj ~ V"/ (1/0 ......... \) i~~:),1 ,I. ': "~.&'.. l- ... . ,.,iT !..~J/l' ""\'\. I '..~\n ~_. 0 \\ 1~1 " <1 ~ ~ ii"~ .., JJ\i..t:f. .', ..~i~,. V' ~'_Air';'1I "...// :i2." . ~.." ~ l '\ i: , .L; \ '_ .:, \ "'5'1 ~r.I' .... ,; " -.:; ,~! ~ \:, ,', .., ] Ill!. .,.- ~.'.. I I .--/"..., ~ c;,.: .' .~--""". i i \ ,'-/ lit. l:d ,):; "'lI1.. ~ J.... il ~~ : ......._)!~ : ~l Ol:' ,,' ! ( :" /--:::.-...,0., ~ .. ~---~ .:..) I \ I t 0 '7' ~ IP.. (1-'" 1 \ / ~~/ (j) . ~~ ['!, . j 'i! I '" I, ,.' ~ . --. l: ,\ ' . > '.. '- "":._ "C" ,:,~-. '.:"J . " . " '!:;~ ~ \ ~:::ii!t/--- 0 ro'~ ,/1 .n) \l~ . ~ ' I . l!lj ~ ! ."~, .'~\) .. /~~\1l~...\__ ~, ~.,.... ~ ~ ~~'-I"~~~ '. (f i~ . ,t) L' I ~ ~ . I r....... I . ~ /. t': / ,,...-~ j · m' ~" ":'. f- . , }t. .:' J. , ~ 00 i!i ' I, -. (.:. ~ : i ~ )) J v '1/,JI:T!l.1 . I . V I .: . ;J.i '. . ") ~ ~~~~ ~ J"~. -'0 , ~l.';'-:'~(I//ij;, l~~~r. ~.O' '.-:' . E~/\_:~.111.1 lIt ~ .(j) . .' -'-. P' . J Cl \ ~ \ \1 T' ." , " 'C:: ' .. . rf!"':: /," '. ':'.. .' . . ~..-J . .' ,.., d ~~:}f/ 1,:-" \~\ ". i (q"" " .... '.."'- ....., ('}-h '-:-"':.' '~~ . ~ Z~ ; .. . ~): ~g(-. ~ \\:' *~. . .. .~ ~-,:".~" .: ,,'~~r .... ". "t,...j; I' ( ~ \! \ . -j ';.0\ / ~~\ . ~'''.': . '-..:..:"1: '- ~ ~ ~ ~ I , '. \ ('.1. \ \ ~\~: ....,-.1 /;/ 0" (lit oj.iS'~ . . 'IO~~ .~. ~ ~ "t .~~'t:\'{J\';;'.ffr~J\IY~' ."1,1_ ~ Ii" ! ~ . ..l~ ~...... '\ ~.I~'~ .' ~. '1..~.'i; f' ~ 'r;. '" <.'" C')\)(~~) ) 't~l' ~I..\\..'i)) "'. ~~~-%4' .'~~!'~:.. :'.7 'iL~~\{t(~,~; ...~~~~~.~ '0 ~ ~ f,"' z o ~ u o ~ ~ E-l ~ \I.l Ii'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ':.,-,-. '-J ...._....--... ._k "~' ,.'._ ....._ _k,"'__' ....~,.._L..__~ _ ~_., ._~. __."__,.~.._'_ ~ "..- ..' - - - - - ~ ~ E-l1""'4 ~E-l ~~ ~~ ooi: ~~ ~o ~u ~~ ~~ E-l~ UZ ~z b~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '.',,<1'- '- - - I HENNEPIN COUNTY SOIL SURVEY HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B Delineation Map Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 .. WSB &~.bIA IIJN '9]ij 866S ~ 13U'O Hya :A9 AdD:) CRIJ::l3ll 6661 VJ.OSnINlJ\I 'aOOMIDIOHS A.J.INI;)IA avOH N:I'If> UIOdIDI NOUVmI'l:la aNV'IJ.:lM QZVS9 NW 'SYodeeuUfW PJBI\llfnoa B18ZAeM ~m ""wo 9lIBl JlOOMls"M 09& '3"d -ONIHElN311fM .~ l:l313d SO'HOC MBa 'ON J..:l3rotld IA& O]lI:)]HJ ~v u_-ss~ ''''8"91530 IABNYld S1I3NNVld . S1I33NION3 OOLI-ltS XV~ ooerltS-~~8 311nJ.onlllS\lll.tNI "",['DlDpo",, I' 'UOS3NNJW .:10 319.1.5 31U .:10 sa'1 3tU. 1130rfl1l33Ni:IN1 l'NOlSS3.:10~d 01ll31S/33t1 A1t1a , "WI .l.'rtu. QNy NOIS,^}l]ddllS l:lli/l(l An lllCINn alO AS (I311Vd3tid SYM H:lOd3H ij(I'NOILVJI.:I133dS 'Hv,.. Situ. J.JH.l. "..:lIUt):) J.S3113HI SSM .. NOUw,w'1dX3 .." 'ON IGIS(A3lI OlUlN SY 131'1':)5 0 0 >- w ~ 0 "' ~ ~ z 0 + "' '" w -' < 0 u + "' III + + ~/ / :::.~"1:::;;':=- ~.~.~ -~-? + ", j I i I \ } , , / \ \ :::: ::-_:::::".:':_::'~':::'._:.:;;~.:::-.:-~- "' l'i v - - - - - - - - - UllP'IOOI~\PiiirOI\:AI _ - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ". APPENDIX C Delineation Data Sheets Wetland Delineation Report Glen Road Vicinity WSB Project No. 1074.46 Page 8 .. WSB &: AaociDIa.lnt:. I I I I I I I I I. I I I I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) . . , Wedand Hydrology Indicators: Prim~ IndlC8tors: ' _ lnundeted _ Setureted in Upper 12 Inche. W.er ~ _DriftUnn _ S4Idiment Deposits _ Dl'lIinage Patterns in Wedand. Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ OJ!idjzed Root Channel. in Upper 12 Inches Water-S~ned Leave. Local Soil Survey Dahl = FAC-Neutrld TUt _ Other (&pllan in' Remarkst Project/Site: Sh<:.r < '-,,_\ ~(: i;.,. !J<.. \ Applicant/Owner: Investigator: S. l.\.~\'""'I:" Do Normal Circumstances exist on the .site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the ,area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, eXplain on reverse.) V~GETAnON Dominant ptant SD.ci.s Stratum "Indicator 1 ~ l ~>;"'-",Y/'~; i1 "","-::,+1-1,:;, ,:l"", "Q~ lr..!t:..k7:~.t~' ~,-:. t1\\.- E~ c. 9. 10. 11. 12- : 13. 14. 15. 16. 2. . t111'Y\\15 Y'u 1, r.::_ ~:.....;. ~_ ;:.:,'. " - \ ~ 3. 4. 5. 8. 7. 8. Peroent of Dominant Specie. that are OBI.. FACW or FAC (excfuding FAC-). Remarks: HYDROLOGY ,.../Recotded D8bI (Describe In Remarkalt: ~ Strum. LAlce, or Tide Gauge L Aerial Photogtllpha Other _ No RaCOfdad Datil AWlilabI. ~' ) {,,}l ltfi"/ 1.IjIl1t" I I I I I I Field ObHrv8dons: Depth of Surface Water: C. (In.) Depth to Free Water in PIt: (In.) Depth to Saturated Soi: (lnJ R.....: WTI, 1995 - 196 - @; No Yes cf'+lQ.:.. Yes (No) ,-/ Date: 16/'</""'1 County: (,\~J t , \. State: M I\! Communl'tv 10' ('I I ( . .,.... . . ''') i' 1", '. ", ",_..~,..",.....,. ','~' Transect 10: . Plot 10: ,<;,p- I Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phasel: L 8.: (.,. ~" Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ac.l'",<!... If:;r.,,;, ,,-,"c\o\\ s Profile OesctiDtion: Oepth "nchesl Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moistl O-l~ A ~ _ ~ll , ll) "'iI--,' I 11..- - 1D G 1;~ 'tn..'Y/ Hydric Soil Indicators: i '. _ Histosol _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor V Aquic Moisture Regime _ Reducing Conclitions _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Remerks: "l., WETlAND DETERMINATION Mottle Colors (Munsell Moistl I ",' $1/ \b l:' jL..: , HycIrophytic Vegetation Presenti' Wedanq Hydrology Presenti' Hydric Soils Presanti' ,..-- Vas {Ng (arde) VIS '~ Ve. (H.o"::., Ramarkll: I I Drainage Class: ~ ~O. t.~(\. ()If_ Field Obaervlltions ~' Confirm Mapped. Typ..i";'~~s>, No I I Mottle Abundancs/Confrast TextUre. Concretions. Structure, ete; /<:,c'CI'--\;, ~LJL,\" , I i !,S0-f\..,. ~\k>~h) I '-- , \o~\ I I I Concretions ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandv Soil. _ Organic.Streaking in Sandy Soils' _ Usted on Local Hydric Soil. Ust Usted on National Hydric Soils Ust - Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I I I III this Sampling Point Within a Wedand7 (Circle) Ve. ~ I I I y I I -197 . wn, 1998 I 1 1 1 1 1 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETEltMINA TJON (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjeCtlSite:')h'il'~~;'" ' _ r'.., Applicant/Owner: Investigator: ' '3. \_~,. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the .area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse.) VSif']-I-A;.! 0 1 ';""1 1~..,t..::"';:"\ 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I Vt:GETATION Dominant Pfai'lt Soedes Stratum "Indlcator 1 ~l=' ft:- ,.: i... i:r: l-\ '~c, .'.....0. . (13 ~ ,'\ ~i"~' 'J -r 1 +' Lel),.) +. 2L;., {Li ,'," IT' 0 ;"'\\ . \ "It ,'. :'. ~-"<"_,.;;.t- ':" ,:"~ !="tJ,'J) 3.l1Af~ ~~,'., ;;c;~~ Fr." f C.. "P>\j,..)J.:j:,- ;'-i~ 4. C: l \\~,..~~~"~\ ~,r~~7 < (.~~~~i~~~~,(') H: ,)1.. _ .:j!~:,. , 5. 6. '""-. 7. 8. Paroent of Dominant Specie. that ere OBI.. FACW or FAC (SJCduding FAC-). Relnillb: 1';,'" !'), ',_, ~~ ' .... -~. ~,,(~ HYDROLOGY ~Reoorded DlIta (Daacnbe In Remerks): _ StrIIam. Lake, or Tide Geuge ..:;;:;: Aeriel PhotOor-PM Other _ No Re"COid.d DetlI AVlIIIebJe Field Obaervedo..: "--.- Depth of SurfRe Water: (In.) t~ Depth to Free Water in Pit: IIn.) \ t.,. Depth to Saturated Soil: lInJ R.....: ~ t C ;~.l", \:.:'" WTI, 1995 ../ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. '...,Ji' 7~ 'Ie , -., (,Yas No Yes ~ti.o Yes (N9:' Dominant Plant Soecies Date'. 1-'\ \ ,,: '('I """"". (;>, , County: \j)::.' ;..1 ' State: ", ) Community. 10: I~,.\'eh..,.. Transect 10: Plot 10: fp-1.- Stratum Indicator . ' . , Wedand Hydrology Indicate,.: Prilllllry In9icstors: . ..t::.'J"''''deted ..:.L Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _ Water Marks _ Drift Un.. _Sediment Deposits L Drainage Plltt8mll in We1iands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ Oxid~ Root a.~el8 in Upper 12 Inch.. _ W.e,.Sblinad La..,.. , .lC. Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutrai Test ~.Other (Explain in'Relllllrks) ! ti,;, ""';-':"'".,,,t ,- .J -196 - ,~""I"-. :':/ .' ~~\ . ,.:[ /)~ '-:--." SOILS i \ Map Unit Name tk,,,,~\ j) (Series and Phase): Drainage etass: ' 4. ,6,,,-:! C",," , \.,,\\ .", Field Obsarvations Taxonomy (Subgroup): T.d" Confirm Mapped. Type'? ~ No - Profile DescriDtion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions, finches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Confrast Structure. etc. - . !oYI1... 1/\ " : "i ["_ \,0 fJ.:. , r.., '" ~ v.5v"V'~ ~ ,.;, r f:~:r'~ C_~:';t"'~:....!-'-'"'::t'-' ~rl""',l., '-:> ,T., ", ' ( {) '" (l-1.{. J ~ lei:., ~\ \1 [,-..''1 - .........~.~ \' " ~~ "'" " ~ )-"'il,_~",l\--", ) - ", Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol V CGncretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils ~lfidiC Odor Organic,Strewng in Sandy Soils _ Aqwc MotstUre Regtme Zusted on Local Hydric Soils Ust '.. , " _ Reducing CGnditions v Usted on Nadon" Hydric Soils Ust _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in RemariCs) Remarks: .,~ . 'WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydraphydc Vegetation Pment? We1Iancl Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Yii:, No (Circle) 'Vis> No Y..: No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedand7 Ye. )No .,/ (Circle) Remarks: - 197 - WTI, 1991 I I I I 1L~b.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETlAND DETERMINA TJON (l987 COE Wetlands Delineaticm Manual) . . . Wedand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Llnundated LSaturated in Upper 12 Inches _ Water MarIc.s Drift Un.. _l}ediment Deposits " ~rainaGle Pettams inWedands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root awinels in Upper 12 Inches ~W.ter-Stalned Leaves L Local Soil Survey Data FAC.Neutntl Test _ Other (Explain in Remilrks) \.0-;-; , .."^' '~a.-_:V{'l,[. f Project/Site: '1h""o_"-',,,,,J - C I~" ]!-'x:-~" Applicant/Owner: Investigator: J".... "rC L "+-~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the ,area a potential Problem Area? (If needed; explain on reverse.) I' I I I I I, I I I I V~ETAnON {.-.. ~--,...~ ,;...,~ ,,-- Dominant Plant SDecles Stratum Indicator (\\1,( 9. to. '1. 12. : t3. t4. t5. 16. 'yt C"".;;_.<~.i.~:i'::<i '<..- 1 ,(1~{Ct!"""t'".,:,;; i'-"l'?" 2. j:, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. ~-~~", -. (~L". i< ".,,, '\ ~k_U\' Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI.. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). Rernartc8: 'iJ,v to"Jih., .;..il>>._\ :~'>:"i. HYDROLOGY L/fleoordecl Data (Describe In Rem...t: _Stream, Lake, or lid. Gauge ..=::: Aerial Phocogl'llphs Other _ No R.-;;;n,ecI D4Ita AwilabJ. I I I I I I Field Observetfons: Depth of Surface Water: "--.... (In.) IL, L. '{ , Depth to Free Water In Pit: (In.) Depth to Sdlratsd Soil: (inJ R~: 'i}",;> , wn, 1_ - 196 - Yes No Yes No Yes No Dominant Plant Soeeies -::; ;!f'\ "''1'1:-_...*.....< <;y" , O 1\1/1""'\" 'ate: :.?- f, i ' C County: U/S.,;i., State:1v\i\J Community 10: r l,.J. f\.k-Aib'...-' Transect ID: ' Plot 10: (f ,} ~{/7!:-'.'1. ~\:, Stratum Indicator SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): rk::.N:'\ ~ Taxonomy (Subgroup): Is' Profile OescriDtion: Oepth . linches' Horizon D, ,7. ~ Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) kn"(L'" . II) y~ ~/I Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) R":>o% Hydric SoillndicatDnI: \ " _ Histosol _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor .JL'Aquic Moisture Regime _ ReducinG Conditions _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I I I Drainage Ctass: "\) Field Obeervations Confirm Mapped. Type'? Mottle Abundance/Contrast ~ - y~ No I TextUre,. Concretions. Structure. etc. ~b} J"",-f'r f ft.) i. )(:) I I ;),'-. -r'{'. I I I I I Conc;etions -=- High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils ~rganic .Streaking in Sandy Solis ~ed on Local Hydric Salls Ust "7 Usted on Netional Hydric Soiis Ust = Other (Expt8in in Remarks) I . { 'I . . \. J' Remarks: <So' . fl' t Ptc<c"ccl ;,/\ l'l,,\,,~-l....I~..: t,JPl.lt"/",,,~ ,-exire_~ S""".'l"",J:~. I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytfc VeQetation Pr...ntl Wetlanq HydroloGl'( Present? Hydric Soils Preaentl . ~ No (CIrcle) ~...No ~NO Remarks: I I (CIrcle) (-~NO \._~".""". I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedandl I I I - 197 - I wn, 1995 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I, I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetfands Delineaticm Manual) . - . Wedand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Ipdlcators: . ~)nundated .:i2: Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks _ Drift Un.. _ Sediment Depo8its _ Drainage Patterns in'Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ Oxidized ROQt ChaMels in Upper 12 lnchea _ Wat...St8ined Leaves _ Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutnd Teat _ Other (ExpI8in in Rsmarks) Project/Site: 5"i:-Iu,,;;:\.:~f": Applicant/Owner: Investigator: .:r.. 4:-n'h Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the .area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse.) ~ (;;LE:.r, ~, "U,~j;(;;. ;;"":, V~ETATlON Dominant Plant SDedes 1;e. I:..~",~b^,. ,,(C'ii':;:~::", l.\"";,y"-t 2..~ #;}' {' -<>1. L..', 1"\. 't-o t :f,,",~,_ ,~~~t-/"'.~_J""" C<_",'~ ;.....,~ Stratum . "Indicator U "tK.. "\" FL~.\,1~r 3.l\.""""Vh,-1. (V",",'l'ci.,,', '-r/1 tk\!--i- 11. ># -, ,. 4. "1:>. <;';>'!':"f\>"-";' i' '''e_ CS.\ ri",:,. . ):',20,>>\ 12- 5. ~~.~~.., c 0",("~'..(.., . G:.:fi.....,J4.,., ') F~, - 13. 8. 14. ~ 1~ a 1a P8lOent of DomiMnt Speci.. that a,. OBL,. FACW or FAC (axcluding FAC-). Remarks: HYDROLOGY ,/" ~ Recorded Dsta (Descnbe in Rem8rkah _ Stresrn. Lake. or TIde a_ge _ Ae.... Photograpll8 Other , _ No R~ed Data AVlIiIabJe Field ObarYadoM: Depth of Surface Water: (y (In.) 2..0 (In.) .. \"L-. (inJ Depth to Free Water In PIt: Depth to Seturated StaiI: R.....: WT1, 1_ - 196 - Date: --1216 ( Y9 County:\JP.J,) . State: "",v "'I/'~:--"\ ~' ~\.. ~s: No Yesc.No Yes < No-" Community. 10: (;.Ji''-.ll)~tpif-..[ Transect 10: Plot 10: r;p Q;; Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 9. 10. 't6YD~ ,-.,--",' SOILS \. Map Unit Name !..\~'I"~1 Q (Seri.s and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomv (Subgroup): "t, in'~ blf'q ;c,,<:'! \",\\ j Field Obsarvations if:;) Confirm Mapped. Type'? No - Profil. Oescriotion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle TextUre, Concretions. Cinchesl Horizon CMunsellMoistl (Muns./1 Moistl Abundance/Confl'ast Structure. etc. \r)'y iL1t1 "------ '-,- tOi:l.vY'- " ~~~W\"'~ a-I~ ~ '~\I,$,;.k,. , I ., ,( toY jL~'f ..,....~-----'- ~--, td~'~v~ <t\ou>,?~~ 'h ~ P-~2-'r "- '3 "~-,~t:"5'~~~~"',,,1"';;" .. - Hydric Soil Indicators: _ HistQsol - Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic. Cont.nt in Surfece Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor _ Organic .Streaking in Sandy Soils . ~'quic Moisture Regime _v1.isted on Loc:af Hydric Soils Ust .. , . _ Reducing Conditions 7u.ted on National Hydric Soil. Ust - , . _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Exp'-in in Remerks) Remarks: WETlAND DETERMINATION Hydraphytic Vegetation Present? WedanQ Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Presant? cv;. No (Circle) .;CfM No (T.l~\ No ",-~. (CIrcle) Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedand? ~ No Remarks: - 197 - WTI, 1996 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I .1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (l987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) . . . Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches - Wat. Marks _OriftUnes _ Sediment Oepo.ts Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Sacond;;y Indicators (2 or more required): _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches _ Water-Stained Leaves Lac" Soil Survey Data - FAC-Neutr81 Teat _ Other (Explain in..RemarksJ \.ellS "'t!_-i: ;..j P .ect/S' 'te S 1\ ....',- ,.' : ._-'. .', rOJ I: \~,>; A~j.~ II>-'c>,:',-, - G".~'''-;!} Applicant/Owner: Investigator: -..\ \ ; ,J! ~ ~...' ~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypica' Situation)? Is the ,area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse.) V~GETAnON Dominant Plant SDecl.. Stratum "Indicator 1. Q_ ~ne>),....)~r" \. ,:~ ~",~,. p-, ,~.; " ''"; PCl 2.~. ''>,dr',., U1 i~n;\ 3. l. - C:::hr.~h..,.. ...., _~>f.:'_,,~ t'J'/3~_t "f "\ ~ 'fix . - ~ 12. ~ 1& L 1~ ~ 1~ a 1~ Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FAC:W or FAC. \ c., (excluding FAC-J. C;6(b Remarks: HYDROLOGY ...::R'ltCOlded Data (Oe.crib.ln R.merlc8J: _ Stream. Lak.. or 11d. Gaua. J.o::. Ae". PhotoGnlphs Other _ No R_rded Deta AwiIaDf. Fielcl ObRrvadons: Depth of Surface Water: """- (In.) Depth to Fre. Water in PIt: e--.. (In.) Depth to Saturated Soil: - Cin.) Yes No Yes No Yes No Oominant Plant Soecies 9. 10. 11. Ram~: 5' '/.;'1\, l.. ~(..._, ; -:) WTI, 1985 -196 - I } f I~,~ Date: _~Or'& I'll County: f.J.EtJ..) State:"", rJ ' Community. 10: Sgno~! (/:,iirf' Transect 10: Plot 10: r p t; Stratum Indicator ":'--~ SOILS- . Map Unit Name . U I, (Series and Phase): lc,..rl"')), Taxonomy (Subgroup): Profile DescnDtion: Depth <<nchesl Honzon c\ -) "L k_<c :c,.. Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors ~Munsell Moistl [O'(iL.'l/1 '0\:" Hydric Soil Indicators: \ .! Remarks: _ HistQsol _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor V"Aquic Moisture Regime _ Reducing CGnditioris _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma C4lors I I I '" Drainage Class: r Field Observetions Contirm Mapped. Type-? ~y;; No Mottle Abundance/Confrast I ---....-" Texture, Concretions. Structure, etc. I fG'A,~" "&f5CJ,(T .,.,,,--~'~ ,;'c ,,; ,""" I I I I _ Concretions _ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils ~rganic.Streakinain Sandy Soils ~sted on Local Hydric Soil. Ust v Listed on National Hydric Soiis List - Other (Explei'n in Remarks) 1- .1~ WETlAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Weda~ Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil. Pre.ent? ~ N,o (Circle) "(es (No) 'v..' No Remark8: l;l h ' , OC rj Sf -'V",1 ! Is this Sampling Point Within e Wedand? I I I I (Circle) Ve. (Ni;\ .~) I I I I -197 . I W11, 1995 I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987. COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) 1'>-__ \,\J'::. .. ~. . .\ Date: [';llOcr;. County: :./~:'i' State: t\ fc Community 10: Transect 10: Plot 10: .tiP -U- . ' .........1 Project/Site:' .,~ l"\~>"', Applicant/Owner: Investigator: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is-the site significantfy disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the .area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, eXplain on reverse.) Yes No Yes No Yes . No V~ETAnON Dominant Plant Soeciet Stratum '.'ndicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1~C, ,'. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. . . ('" 9. 10. t 1. 12. . 13. 14. 15. 16. 7'.'-'''''' ~, Plm:ent of Dominant Species that are OBI.. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). Rarmlrkr. HYDROLOGY . F'.;>" L Recorded Data (Describa in Remarbt: Stre.m. Lake. or TIde Geuge .;:;;::: Aerial PhotognIpha Other _ No R.ooRted Dft! Awilable . . . Wedand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: /Inund.ud ,>'iaturated in Upper 12 Inches - Water Maries _ Dlift,Unes _ Secfament Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wedands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): (In.) _ Oxidized Root Charin'" in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves (In.) ~ Local Soil Survey Data FAC.Neutral Test IIR.) _ Other (&pl.n in Remartcs) Fi*l ObRrvadons: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: .7 "';1 !_~ /-- Depth to Saturated Soil: :~7 R~: .,:..-...... WTI, 1_ . 196 - SOILS Map' Unit Name (Series and' Phase): (~k-:"",- ',--<-. N',_. \,~.~ \~,>~n '"'-' \.>c \.\ S Taxonomy (Subgroup): Protile Oescriotion: Oepth flnchesl Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors {Munsell Moistl ";-- , _t..~ ij po, .t;- ~, \ '""'f /..... ";'1,(..." -f /--,\!>->'i! ," r . j -r iL. Hydric Soil Indicators: l Histosol _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor . 7Aquic Moisture Regime 7, Reducing Conditions ~Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Remarks: WETlAND DETERMINATION H'/drophytlc Veoetation Present? Wetla~ Hydrology Present? H'/dric Soils Pre.entl ,.~ No (Circle) ViS> No i!!~5 No Remarks: Drainage etass: Field Observetions Confirm Mapped, Type'lYes\ No Mottle Abundance/Contrast ------../ Texture, Concretions. Structure. etc. [;,_. "t:.,. '-,U;J".'\"t .\,1'1.,,6.....\ "i_i>,.,~.,\:,," "''"'''' ,,-<~ ft-;;"'"'.:'j,i'"' , , ji , 1"'\:\" ';",-"' ~~ ,j. ,j/ Concretions _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils -"Organic,Streeking in ~8ndy Soifs LUsted on Local H'/dric Soils Ust \/'" Usted on National H'/dric Soils Ust = Other (Explain in Remarks) (Circlet -" I. this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (Ves ) No -197 . wn, 1998 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I ..........'_..... ...'t'_':;' ....oP.f W~1LP,MO 1.- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETlAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands DelineatiQn Manual) Project/Site: 5bc.r ~,~",'-,\ - C~~..... ~A-\ Applicant/Owner: Investigator: ::r. I ,,"h. o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the ,area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, eXplain on reverse.) ;~ '\ \,,5; S''. d.Sl,)' \'u...J! "/,,_(.-<._.),, ',.._ , 7/'''- yt:GETATI'ON ',....' Yes Yes Yes ~ ~ Date: ~ \'6'"\ '19 County: ~f'JjJ.. State: l\,'rJ Community I D: Transect I D: Plot ID: "SP, ! Dominant Pfant SDedes 1 ~l'" '2'0::, ~ ,j '. ~.\~-<.. <:\? _ i. (} 2.A. ~::'''f\..\,l'''''~'i /' ,~ J... ,3. ( . 'C'"-c...-(',,,' 4. 5. 8. 7. a. Stratum '''Indicator , J:,~?:X:_L) -""'/'/; ( { 1-" ,," l'"/-..;; ..:-- 9. 10. 11. 12- , 13. 14. 15. 16. Dominant Plant Soecies Percent of Dominant Species that era OBL. FACW or FAC .?'/ (axcludlng FAC-). 0 / ;) Remerks: iJe-. HYDROLOGY '~ Recorded Data (Ducnb. In Remarks): ....... Stream. Lake. or TId. Gauge ~Aerial Photographll Other _ No R_rded Dau AYIIiIabJe Field Ob8ervadons: Depth of SurfllOe Water: Depth to Free Water in Ph: Depth to S"rated Soil: R~: WTI, 1_ -----. (In.) (In.) ClnJ ~:;';~ Stratum Indicator . . . Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches WaterMarka _ Drift' Un.. _ Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattemsin Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Chennels in Upper 12 Inch.. = Water-Steined Leaves _ LoceI Soil, SUMr( Data FAC-NeutraI Test _ Other (&plan in Remarks) - 196 - ".;..---..1 - . -a. !9 ~ i - - - - :II ~ . t .. X<X 1.:'1. :s.c:t.a o · ga .il} _. J: -a. -'to :'fl:: :00 .0. ::J< &: ::'"1Ic:t. i g II it "" ~~~ "/,.,-\ ...~... .,"~\ \ ~(~\~ 'fi a ~ ii 9- ii' en t I, "11 2. it i S: ::J . ~ a. I .., i n \;i, I e,! - - =e .~ z c ~ i: ~ ::f o 2 - ..:../. . - :II . 3 S. !! I I I I I I Q:u:a.cnx:J: ii a.g e. ii' ii' <at: E.:3ld.g ane!:O... o :J'!: 0 .s' 2- ..000-. o-'a.-a b02~l ~ i; g :r g., 2 i j' R o i3 I I I I I I iocco:r:o II.. .. -.0 ,..,..0'g.:J .. II S 0 ~, '.....0 0 ri'~!! ::J ::J . IU _. en.o ifb;la.i :I'rd. I ~ n. -, g Ef. fl :ll.xi :I ~...1.....; ::I <" ::I. :I :I .a.oen'" ;J. :I. en !!! :,. iIi'n 0- -en'''' ~ g' !It=-en~ _ .., e II t:l1 itU l!l ~ 1 .. s' en II il < en e. ii' - - :r: -a :So n CIl 8. ! n .. (; ~ - - t s:~ ; a :: II =0 s:2- o 0 ~. ;,; (0'11 :I. ... I) 'tJ 0 :r...::ll ...:7- ... ... - 0 It ... I) :3. d. o ::! .' If i u I I J :a.s: 0"0 5 a. f}CD ::J I) .. n o a ... OJ fA ... l/l~ ~ ~ e; .. . .. 0 .. 0 ... :I n n , .. II ::t. o :J ~ -'- :J: o :3. N o :J s:S: C AI :J q :: )c. =0 s:2- o 0 -. .. ~ - ~ )( o ::J o 3 < Ui C. 0- (Q .. o c * UiS: CD III ::2. 'tJ CD C : 2. :J lOt a.z '1I1J ':1"3 I: It ~ OJlO It ~ ga: -. ::ll0~ 3 fl ~ s:CIIo DI ~ iii 'tJ II fA _ d.1Il w 0 .. .. ::I 11.... ..... ~ ~ ..-.,\ -<I :/' z o - CJ) o ;= (J) - - I I I I I I I I I. I I I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETlANDDETERMINA TJON (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) "'\ .i.-. ProjectlSite: (k", (c",-_ . - ,,: '"" Applicant/Owner: Investigator: ,c:-, t .:b Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantfy disturbed (Atypica' Situation)? Is the .area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, eXplain on reverse.) \ ..-) ,"'"""\ Date: 1('. 'A i'-"1 County: \\,;:;, fJ rJ State: "",'-' Yes\No Yes No YesNQ~ ., " Community ID: (n, 1Ie,,,-, t11,o..I"\ Transect ID: . Plot 10: )'f -";~ ~GETAnON Dominant Plant Soecies 1:7_ C,~r 2.L. I " ,'. ; <,rr.-i...",,' Stratum "Indicator Oominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator " 9, 10. 11. 12. : 13, 14. 15, 16, ,. ( 3. 4, 5. 8. 7, 8, Pero.nt of Oominant Speci.. that ere OBL. FACW or FAC . (lnCeluding FAC-). Rem8rks: I '\' ()()7> HYDROLOGY , , Depth of Surfac. Water: (In.) . . . W.dand Hydrology Incllcatcn: Primary Iqdlcatorr. 1/ Inundated ~.;.s.....rated in Upper 12 Inche. Water M.u _ Orift Un.. _ Sediment Depoeita Drllinaga Patterns in Wedand. Secondary Indicatora (2 or more required): _ Oxidized Root Chennels in Upper 12 Inches _ Wat.....Stained Leave. ?Lo,* Soil Survey Cata FAC-Neutr8! Teat 7 Other (&pI8in in Remarks) I I I I I I I _ Recorded CatAI (Ce.crib.ln R.marks): Strum. Laka. or TId. Gauge 7'A..... PhotograpM Other _ No R.corde4 Data AYlIIabI. Field Obll.rvedona: Depth to Fre. Water in Pit: {, (In,) Depth to Saturated Soil: o (lnJ R........: .~. .:-----.. wn, 1895 .196 . SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): C;t~t"'c~,c.;".. Taxonomy (Subgroup): Profile Oeseriation: Oepth (inchesl Horizon 0- L Hydric Soil Indicators: \ " '\ \,) .J.o\\ < A. ~\ Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Nl ~' Mottle Colors {Munsell Moistl Histosol ' Histic Epipedon ~~Ulfidic Odor ..::::: Aquic Moisture Regime _ tieducing C4nditions Z Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors l " / Remarks: ,6:.13 )'i./.,," 'cif>o -e' I I Vw Drainage Class: ] Field Olaervations Contirm Mapped Type'? (~ No I I Mottle Abundanee/Conrrast Texture. Concretions, Structure. etc. I ~'1_)J ~$.-'~~~~"< ~ I I I Concretions _ Hi;h Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils ---yOrganic,StreelUng in Sandy Soils .L Ustad on Locaf H'tdric Soils Ust ZUsted on Na~onaf H'tdri~ Soils Ust _ Other (Expl8in in Remarks) I I I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophvtic Vegetadon Present? Wedancl Hydrotogy Present? ! Hydric Soil. Present? ~ No (Circle) ,'(a":' No (yif No "--- ' Remarka: I I (Circle) Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedand? -'-~ " Ves) No ',~-------..... I I I I I - 197 . W11, 1995 I I I I I I I I I I::' I I I I I;~-' I I I I I A €;~ J It,.A;' () 1,.- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND o ETERMINA TJON (1987 COE Wetlands Delineatic;ln Manual) Project/Site: ('" l.:.: ,'. -,:' i~,. \i.:., ApplicantlOwn'er: Investigatot:<-,." L. ;;.,...:.:;, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the .area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, eXplain on reverse.) ~GETATlON Dominsnt Plant SD.cl.s . 1. 4" '" <,",>' ~J' ..,,_,. ( j~ ,'.. Ii,. 2. ), "\ "1 ' ., '" . ' , " (" '';), .....c,:. 3. V.. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ,,~,"~ "'1? I:~~I"':, ('." '. ~ ife( Stratum ' Indicator i~ll~,_..c; .' ,; "T .ri. ~""!j/_-",,- hcc..LJ-+ Percent of Dominant Species that.. OBI.. FACW or FAC (8J(cludlng FAC-). Remarks: HYDROLOGY , (. /~. - ..;;:. ReoOfdad Data (Describe In RelNrkll): $tram. Lafce, or r. Gauge ~'Aeri" Photogrllphll Other _ NO' ReCOrded Datil AYlIiIabI. Filld Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free W.... In PIt: Depth to Saturated Soil: R~: . WTI, 1_ ' ,-------., '----...:n." . - (in.) (in.) (In.) ""I -:;-;/L: Yes No Yes No Yes No Dominant Plant Soltcies 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 1S, Date: Id"1 !-:;C" County: Li~:)., . State: ii' !', Community 10: Transect 10: Plot 10: Stratum -,,- '_ i' Indicator . Wsdand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: InundMH _ Saturated In Upper 12 Inche. Water Martca Drift Unes _ Sediment Deposits _ Drllinsge Patterns in Wedands Sacondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ OxlclJzed Root Charinels In Upper 12 Inche. _ Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data - FAC-Neutraf Tast _ Other (Explain in Remarks) .196 - ~. , .. ''Jil: ". : ,-..." SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): 1-<:::.-5\-" (- Taxonomy (SubgrDu~l: Profile Descriotion: Depth finchesl Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moistl 2/ ~. '/nYA f i Mottle Colors (Munsell MoistJ O./u ~' '- r-- Hydric 5oillndlcators: i , .! Histosol _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor _ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Reducing Conditions _ Glayed or Low-Chroma Colors Remerks: WETlAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetadon Pre.ent? Wetfai1Q Hydrology Present? Hydric Soil. Pment? ~, Ve. (ffi (Circle) Ves ,~ Ve. iN;) Remariul: .r: \ <' \; -. Drainage Class: '" '" \ Field Observations Contirm Mapped. Type'? Vas: No ,,,~._-' Mottle Abundance/Conrr8st Texture. Concretions, Structure, etc. , l~j~."." ;;i:''''"o - l6'''':A/j , :> ,(', l "i' ""0 ii ()t("^ (" t'".,,.'.....,.,.."v Concretions _ High Organic Content in Surfaca Layer in Sandy Soils _ Organic,Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Usted on Local Hydric Soils Ust _ Usted on Na~onal Hydric Soil. Ust _ Other (Explain in Remarks) (CIrclet Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedand? v.. . liIa. ,. ,/ . 197 . W11,1995 I " I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Office: 612-474-5222 Fax: 612-474-3514 M~ ~~ ekIJ. Assn., Inc. P. O. BOX 360 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 Golf Shop: 474-9571 -': I; " ji' :"\/'/rrT~ , l ~=. ; ;;\\\, r ~ :' \ij ,~I! I:;, '.111; r:::J~ ~ r ----:::::::._, December 13, 1999 , I] j U ',~\/ City of Shorewood Attn: James Hurm, Administrator 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Gentlemen: Ref: Deer Problem on Golf Course . Weare approaching a crisis relative to the existence of the Minnetonka Country Club in the future. Our Golf Course Superintendent has informed me that the yearly increase in damage to our greens over the past few years, by a herd of now 10-11 deer, has reached a point where he no longer can maintain the normal playability of the greens which will adversely affect the retention of our golf members. It is an industry truism that a private golf course could have beautiful fairways, but if the greens are not up to industry standards the course will fail with the land converted to other uses. The deer damage the greens throughout the year by walking/running/stomping over them with their sharp hooves slicing the turf and indenting the surface, making it impossible to putt properly. We spend $8,000.00 each year to purchase flowers, etc., to improve the appearance of the golf course and surrounding areas. The deer consume a large portion of the flowers, which we have contended with, and is not a basis for our problem. The disappearance of flowers does . not affect our operation. Minnetonka Country Club was established in 1916, with the present management in place since 1954. We are a commercial operation and the deer problem is critically affecting us. The City of Maple Plain, among others, has permitted programs to correct deer problems. We respectfully request the City of Shorewood to initiate whatever action is necessary to eliminate the problem. Minnetonka Country Club will, of course, be happy to assist in any manner possible. Sincerely, Minnetonka Country 0Assn., Inc. ~~,Z-. (,.. v?' B. Witrak, President #actA. Check Approval List for 1/10/00 Council Meeting Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 27053- COLLINS ELECTRICAL - Repair Semaphore 12/15/99 JR22186 27053 COLLINS ELECTRICAL Install Cabling - City Hall 12/15/99 JY21851 TOTAL FOR COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM HEBERT. KATHLEEN See 125 Reimbursement 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR HEBERT, KATHLEEN LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Dentallnsuranee - Dee LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Dentallnsuranee - Dee LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Dental Insurance - Dee LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Dental Insurance - Dec TOTAL FOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 27054 27055 27055 27055 27055 27056 27056 27056 27057 . 27058 27058 27059 27059 27059 27059 27059 27060 27061 27061 27061 12/15/99 12/15/99 12/15/99 12/15/99 LOCKGUARD. INC Re-key Liquor Stores LOCKGUARD, INC Re-key Liquor Stores LOCKGUARD. INC Re-key Liquor Stores TOTAL FOR LOCKGUARD,INC MAGUIRE. CHARLIE Entertainment - Apprec. Dinner TOTAL FOR MAGUIRE, CHARLIE 12/15/99 28417 12/15/99 28417 12/15/99 28417 12/15/99 MN SUN PUBLICATION Truth in Taxation Notiee MN SUN PUBLICATION Employment Ad TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/15/99 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/15/99 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/15/99 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/15/99 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER 12/15/99 279939 12/15/99 281580 PAWS, CLAWS & HOOV Animal Boarding Services - Nov 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR PAWS, CLAWS & HOOVES PET PEPSI COLA COMPANY Mise 12/15/99311386-11 PEPSI COLA COMPANY Mise 12/15/99 312193-11 PEPSI COLA COMPANY Misc 12/15/99 312205-11 TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY . 27062 SAM'S CLUB Supplies for Wine Tasting 12/15/99 27062 SAM'S CLUB Supplies for Wine Tasting 12/15/99 27062 SAM'S CLUB Supplies for Wine Tasting 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR SAM'S CLUB 27063 TRUFFLE HILL Candies for Appreciation Dinner 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR TRUFFLE HILL 27064 EXCELSIOR AREA WA Donation to Excelsior War Memorial 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR AREA WAR MEMORIAL FU 27065 MN CROWN DISTRIBUT Wine 12/15/99 7861 TOTAL FOR MN CROWN DISTRIBUTING INC 27066 MINNETONKA REFRIG Repair Coolers 12/15/99 27066 MINNETONKA REFRIG Repair Coolers 12/15/99 TOTAL FOR MINNETONKA REFRIGERATION 27067 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/15/99 780358-00 27067 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/15/99 780558-00 27067 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/15/99 780558-00 27067 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/15/99 781048-00 27067 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor 12/15/99 782928-00 " Thursday, January 06, 1000 $f33.04 $315.00 $448.04 $192.30 $192.30 $9.00 $35.98 $35.99 $456.02 $536.99 $50.91 $69.20 $50.91 $171.02 $425.00 $425.00 $215.00 $138.60 $353.60 $2.410.12 $20.91 $23.28 $216.76 $687.99 $3,359.06 $167.40 $167.40 $38.40 $33.90 $50.85 $123.15 $85.15 $85.15 $85.16 $255.46 $43.60 $43.60 $500.00 $500.00 $372.00 $372.00 $228.84 $146.86 $375.70 $68.31 $362.59 $5.259.02 $3.119.04 $21.98 Page 1 of8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 27067 27067 2Z0fiL 27067 27068 27068 27068 27069 27070 27070 27071 27072 . 27073 27074 27075 27075 27076 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/15/99 783258-00 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/15/99 783258-00 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine_ 12/15/99 783259-00 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/15/99 783259-00 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO WASTE MANAGEMENT- Waste Removal 12/15199 2282-028338 WASTE MANAGEMENT- Waste Removal 12/15/99 2282-028338 WASTE MANAGEMENT- Waste Removal 12/15/99 2282-028342 TOTAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE US POSTMASTER Postage for Jan Newsletter 12/20/99 TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER PERA PERA TOTAL FOR PERA PERA PERA 12/22/99 12/22/99 ICMA RETIREMENT TR Deferred Comp 12/22/99 TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 CITY COUNTY CREDIT Payroll Deduction 12/22199 TOTA.L FOR CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION ARMOR LOCK & ALAR Alarm Monitoring 12/22199 34552 TOTA.L FOR ARMOR LOCK & ALAR1W SVCS BIFFS, INC. Portable Toilet Rent 12/22/99 TOTAL FOR BIFFS,INC. CHASKA BLDG CENTE Snow Stakes 12/22/99 19706 CHASKA BLDG CENTE Sakrete 12/22/99 999441 TOTAL FOR CHASKA BLDG CENTER, lNC HAWKINS WATER TRE Container Demurrage 12/22/99 33229 TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 27077 HEBERT,KATHLEEN See 125 Reimbursement 12/22199 TOTAL FOR HEBERT, KATHLEEN 27078 HENN CO DISTRICT CO Documentation 12/22199 TOTAL FOR HENNCODISTRICTCOURT 27079 LAKE RESTORATION,I Eurasian Milfoil Inspection 12/22/99 9204 . TOTAL FOR LAKE RESTORATION, INC. 27080 LMCIT Y2K Ins Premium 12/22/99 TOTAL FOR LMCIT 27081 27082 27082 27083 27084 27085 27085 27085 27086 METRO COUNCIL ENVI Nov SAC 12/22199 TOTAL FOR METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT Office Supplies Office Supplies TOTA.L FOR OFFICE DEPOT 12/22/99 12/22/99 MN CHILD SUPPORT P Payroll Deduction 12/22199 TOTAL FOR MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR MN SUN PUBLICATION Rink Attend Ad 12/22/99 283677 TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS NAVARRE TRUE V ALU General Supplies NAVARRE TRUE V ALU General Supplies NAVARRE TRUE V ALU General Supplies TOTAL FOR NAVARRE TRUE VALUE 12/22199 12/22199 12/22/99 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/22/99 $1,306.28 $348.11 $940.77 $274.33 $11,700.43 $81.32 $99.09 $41.37 $221.78 $648.32 $648.32 $1,510.80 $1,647.57 $3,158.37 $1,571.00 $1,571.00 $1,252.80 $1,151.80 $145.12 $145.12 $245.78 $245.78 $109.75 $141.94 $251.69 $60.00 $60.00 $192.30 $192.30 $10.00 $10.00 $813.63 $813.63 $1.947.00 $1,947.00 $4,158.00 $4,158.00 $56.80 $155.45 $212.25 $173.51 $173.51 $138.60 $138.60 $14.26 $24.59 $28.72 $67.57 $1,584.10 Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 2 of8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER 27087 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH Mileage & Supplies 12/22/99 2Z0aL_JAZANDAK, JOSEPH Mileage & Supplies 12/22199 TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH 27088 COMPUTER MANAGEM Maint & Support Svcs 12/22/99 986601 27088 COMPUTER MANAGEM Maint & Support Svcs 12/22199 986601 27088 COMPUTER MANAGEM Maint & Support Svcs 12/22/99 986601 TOTAL FOR COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SVC 27089 ROLEK, ALAN Sec 125 Reimbursement 12/22199 TOTAL FOR ROLEK, ALAN 27090 TWIN CITY WATER CLI WaterTestin9 12122/99 5983 TOTAL FOR TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC 27091 WAYZATA DEPUTY RE Auto Title 12/22/99 TOTAL FOR WAYZATA DEPUTY REGISTRAR 27092 MIDWEST COCA-COLA Misc 12/22/99 66100033614 27092 MIDWEST COCA-COLA Misc 12/22/99 66100270332 27092 MIDWEST COCA-COLA Misc 12/22199 66100335934 TOTAL FOR MIDWEST COCA-COLA BorrLIN 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22199 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22199 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22199 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22199 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22/99 27093 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Beer 12/22199 TOTAL FOR EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPAN 27094 NET L1TIN DISTRIBUTO Supplies 12/22/99 5248 TOTAL FOR NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS . 27095 27095 27096 27096 27096 . 27096 27096 27096 27096 27096 27096 27096 27097 27097 27097 27097 27098 27098 12/22199 27610 12122/99 28080 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, I Wine GRAPE BEGINNINGS, I Wine TOTAL FOR GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC GRIGGS, COOPER & C 12/22199 141936 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 12/22/99 141937 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor & Misc 12/22/99 143112 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor & Misc 12/22/99 143112 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR & MISC 12/22199 143115 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR & MISC 12/22/99 143115 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 12/22/99 143137 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/22/99 521542 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/22/99 523387 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/22/99 523395 TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12122/99 1052739 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 1052740 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 1052740 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/22/99 1052742 TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. LAKE REGION VENDIN CIGARETTES 12/22199 m2 LAKE REGION VENDIN CIGARETTES 12/22/99 m4 TOTAL FOR LAKE REGION VENDING 27099 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA Wine 12/22/99 120616 TOTAL FOR PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY $1,584.10 $24.98 $53.73 $78.71 $1.702.17 $1,702.18 $1,702.18 $5,106.53 $174.57 $174.57 $20.00 $20.00 $9.00 $9.00 $388.05 $247.85 $384.00 $1,019.90 $91.00 $99.80 $199.10 $12.935.80 $12,945.55 $13,289.85 $39,561.10 $8.77 $8.77 $99.00 $244.00 $343.00 $181.77 $61.50 $24.95 $453.33 $24.95 $370.39 $369.30 ($72.50) ($15.96) ($56.09) $1,341.64 $1,993.19 $406.08 $3.070.46 $1,014.13 $6,483.86 $408.15 $292.41 $700.56 $399.00 $399.00 Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 1 of8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 305428 ($11.78) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 3205354 ($4.77) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 3205354 ($6.21 ) ------------.- 12/22199 3205424 ($11.02) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI wine 12/22199 3205425 ($2.85) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRt Wine 12/22/99 3205426 ($8.36) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 3205427 ($3.79) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 3205429 ($4.99) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRt Wine 12/22/99 3205430 ($7.32) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 3205431 ($5.99) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 3205432 ($5.17) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 3205433 ($4.50) 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/22/99 557916 $77.80 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPfRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/22/99 557916 $217.49 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 557917 $530.75 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/22/99 557917 $831.10 27100 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/22/99 557918 $161.50 TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $1,741.89 27101 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/22/99 783099-00 $792.00 . 27101 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Liq & Wine 12/22/99 783312-00 $797.72 27101 QUALITY WINE & SPIRt Liq & Wine 12/22/99 783312-00 $2,631.75 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $4,221.47 27102 SCHWAAB, INC Office Supplies 12/22199 A18334 $136.96 27102 SCHWAAB,INC Office Supplies 12/22199 A18334 $26.17 27102 SCHWAAB, INC Offiee Supplies 12/22/99 A 18336 $69.75 TOTAL FOR SCHWAAB,INC $232.88 27103 WINE MERCHANTS WINE 12/22199 23870 $371.00 27103 WINE MERCHANTS Wine 12/22/99 23871 $370.00 TOTAL FOR WINE MERCHANTS $741.00 27104 ADAM'S PEST CONTRO PEST CONTROL 12/30199 90057 $60.17 TOTAL FOR ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC $60.17 27105 EARL F. ANDERSEN, IN SCHOOL ZONE SIGN 12/30/99 21704 $84.90 TOTAL FOR EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. $84.90 27106 BOB'S PERSONAL COF General Supplies 12/30/99 31197 $54.00 . 27106 BOB'S PERSONAL COF General Supplies 12/30199 31199 $50.00 TOTAL FOR BOB'S PERSONAL COFFEE SVC $104.00 27107 BRAUN PUMP & CONT LIFT STATION MAINT 12/30/99 002830 $2,204.12 27107 BRAUN PUMP & CO NT LIFT STATION MAINT 12/30199 002852 $282.00 TOTAL FOR BRAUN PUMP & CONTROLS $2,486.12 27108 CARGILL SALT DIVISIO SALT FOR ICE CONTROL 12/30199 99104481 $1,440.59 TOTAL FOR CARGILL SALT DIVISION $1,440.59 27109 DEPT OF LABOR & IND INSP SVC FOR WATER PRESSURE 12/30/99 584817 $100.00 TOTAL FOR DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY $100.00 27110 EVERGREEN LAND SE TH7ITH41 CONSULTANT FEES 12/30199 8744 $5,665.04 27110 EVERGREEN LAND SE TH7/41 RIGHT OF WAY CONSUL TIN 12/30199 8757 $1,047.15 TOTAL FOR EVERGREEN LAND SERVICE CO $6,712.19 27111 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF 4TH QTR SEWER SVC RENTAL FEE 12/30/99 $2,849.21 TOTAL FOR EXCELS/OR-CITY OF $2,849.2/ 27112 E-Z RECYCLING INC. DECEMBER RECYCLING 12/30199 94 $4,920.00 TOTAL FOR E-Z RECYCLING INC. $4,920.00 27113 GOVT FINANCE OFCRS GFOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 12/30/99 $275.00 ," , Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 4 of8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR GOVT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC $275.00 27114 HAMLlNE UNIVERSITY TUITION ROLEK 12/30/99 $1,020.00 TOTAL FOR HAMLINE UNIVERSITY $1,020.00 27115 HURM, JAMES SEC 125 REIMBURSEMENT 12/30/99 $1,003.57 27115 HURM, JAMES MEETINGS/MILEAGE 12/30/99 $33.49 TOTAL FOR HURM, JAMES $1,037.06 27116 J.H. LARSON ELECTRI TRAFFIC SIGNAUSIGNS 12/30/99 4151898-01 $57.46 TOTAL FOR J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL CO $57.46 27117 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12/30/99 NOV1999SV $84.00 27117 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12/30/99 NOV1999SV $204.00 27117 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12/30/99 NOV1999SV $1,000.00 27117 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12/30/99 NOV1999SV $1,907.95 27117 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12/30/99 NOV1999SV $8,064.15 TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY... $11,260.10 27118 MAGUIRE, CHARLIE SOUND EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR 12/30/99 $25.00 TOTAL FOR MAGUIRE, CHARLIE $25.00 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $52.30 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $104.60 . 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $104.94 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $111.32 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $112.52 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $493.79 27119 MCLEOD USA Communications 12/30/99 3998269 $58.24 TOTAL FOR MCLEOD USA $1,037. 71 27120 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/30/99 083634497/0 $39.30 27120 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/30/99 085456664/0 $273.75 27120 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/30/99 08545666410 $32.54 TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $345.59 27121 MN SUN PUBLICATION EMPLOYMENT AD 12/30/99 284789 $285.60 27121 MN SUN PUBLICATION EMPLOYMENT AD 12/30/99 286008 $576.00 TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS $861.60 27122 WM. MUELLER & SONS BLACKTOP 12/30/99 12421 $461.39 TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INe. $461.39 . 27123 ANCOM TECHNICAL CE CD SIREN MAINTENANCE 12/30/99 6572 $42.50 27123 ANCOM TECHNICAL CE. CD SIREN MAINTENANCE 12/30/99 6572 $88.46 27123 ANCOM TECHNICAL CE CD SIREN MAINTENANCE 12/30/99 6572 $845.00 TOTAL FOR ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER $975.96 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $180.72 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $10.22 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $480.76 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $193.28 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $3.14 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $14.89 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $88.27 27124 NORTHERN STATES P Utilities 12/30/99 $169.60 TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER $1,140.88 27125 PETTY CASH APPRECIATION ACTIVITIES 12/30/99 $25.49 27125 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 12/30/99 $15.75 TOTAL FOR PETTY CASH $41.24 27126 COMPUTER MANAGEM PACE FIXED ASSETS SOFTWARE 12/30/99 986717 $2,130.00 27126 COMPUTER MANAGEM DEC SOFTWARE MAl NT 12/30/99 986718 $167.14 '-- ,~~. Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 5 0/8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date /11voice # Amount 27126 27126 27127 27128 27129 27130 27131 27131 27131 27131 27132 27132 . 27132 27132 27133 27133 27134 27134 27134 . 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27135 27136 27137 27137 27138 COMPUTER MANAGEM DEC SOFTWARE MAINT 12/30/99 986718 COMPUTER MANAGEM DEC SOFTWARE MAl NT 12/30/99 986718 TOTAL FOR COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SVC PROSTAFF TEMP RECEPTIONIST 12/30/99 102-256304 TOTAL FOR PROSTAFF PROTOCOL COMMUNI DSL Service - Aug - Dec, 1999 12/30/99 99200025 TOTAL FOR PROTOCOL COMMUNICATIONS, INC SHOREWOOD TREE R BRUSH REMOVAL 12/30/99 1698 TOTAL FOR SHORE WOOD TREE RESIDENTIA SO LK MTKA PUB SAFE TRAFFIC PATROL OFFICER 12/30/99 TOTAL FOR SO LK MTKA PUB SAFETY DEP SWANDY, DONALD DEC MILEAGE/EXP REPRT SWANDY, DONALD DEC MILEAGE/EXP REPRT SWANDY, DONALD DEC MILEAGE/EXP REPRT SWANDY, DONALD DEC MILEAGElEXP REPRT TOTAL FOR SWANDY, DONALD AT&T WIRELESS SERV CELL PHONE AT&T WIRELESS SERV CELL PHONE AT&T WIRELESS SERV CELL PHONE AT&T WIRELESS SERV CELL PHONE TOTAL FOR AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES US WEST US WEST Communications COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL FOR US WEST 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 6091629000 12/30/99 12/30/99 01074.08 12/30/99 01074.26-00 12/30/99 01074.30 12/30/99 01074.34 12/30/99 01074.37 12/30/99 01074.45 12/30/99 01074.46 12/30/99 01074.47 12/30/99 01074.48 . 12/30/99 01074.49 12/30/99 01074.99 12/30/99 01120.00 12/30/99 01121.01 12/30/99 01121.10 12/30/99 01122.10 12/30/99 01169.00 12/30/99 54204792 12/30/99 12/30/99 12/30/99 17880400 $167.15 $334.29 $1,798.58 $166.32 $166.31 $200.00 5200.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 $17,589.22 $17,589.11 $42.82 $103.82 $42.82 $36.12 $215.58 $28.28 $28.35 $70.68 $11.83 $139.14 $50.84 $244.95 $195.79 $85.40 $198.70 $113.30 $397.40 $5,692.50 $217.50 $128.75 $93.00 $139.50 $614.50 $139..50 $1,810.50 $534.00 $1,464.75 $308.00 $195.00 $800.00 $2.958.00 $214.75 $589.00 $388.50 $16,187. 75 $40.12 540.11 $80.11 $140.23 $120.34 $293.50 Page 6 0[8 Advertising Advertising PHONE DIRECTORY AD TOTAL FOR US WEST DEX WSB AND ASSOCIATE PASS THRU NOV ENGINEERING WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - WATER RESOURC WSB AND ASSOCIATE NOVEMBER ENGINEERING SVCS WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - MIL & OVERLAY 1M WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - OLD MARKET RD R WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - FREEMAN PARK S WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - NSP WATER SVC C WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING -GLEN RD WETLAND WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - MANHOLE REPR P WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING FREEMAN PK ENTR WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING. WOODHAVEN WEL WSB AND ASSOCIATE GEN SVCS ENGINEERING WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - SMITHTOWN/CTRY WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - TH7 ACCESS CLOS WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING TH7 ACCESS CLOS WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - TH7 @TH41 LAYOU WSB AND ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING - EUREKA RD STR I TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIA TES ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES TOTAL FOR ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE US WEST DEX US WEST DEX US WEST DEX NICCUM, LAWRENCE SMALL TOOLS NICCUM, LAWRENCE SMALL TOOLS TOTAL FOR NICCUM, LAWRENCE BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor Thursday, January 06, 2000 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 27138 BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor 12/30/99 17880500 $409.13 27138 BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor 12/30/99 1788070 $133.25 2J138 ElI;LLBOY CORPORA TI Liquor 12/30/99 17922700 $355.&0 -------- 27138 BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor 12/30/99 17922800 $355.60 27138 BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor 12/30/99 17922900 $740.30 TOTAL FOR BELLBOYCORPORATION $2,287.38 27139 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY General Supplies 12/30/99 30976500 $354.58 27139 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC & GEN SUPPLIES 12/30/99 30989100 $22.54 27139 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC & GEN SUPPLIES 12/30/99 30989100 $113.56 TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $490.68 27140 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 12/30/99 121699STMT $1,656.60 27140 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 12/30/99 79405 $966.80 27140 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 12/30/99 80198 $796.20 TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $3,419.60 27141 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TY MISC 12/30/99 12364 $38.40 27141 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TY MISC 12/30/99 12365 $71.40 TOTAL FOR FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COM $109.80 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 141104 $813.84 . 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C WINE 12/30/99 141960 $121.18 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Mise 12/30/99 144102 $13.84 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Wine 12/30/99 144103 $1,228.09 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 12/30/99 144106 $746.37 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 12/30/99 144107 $675.65 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C MISC 12/30/99 144120 $8.60 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C WINE 12/30/99 144121 $252.55 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR & MISC 12/30/99 144122 $28.34 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR & MISC 12/30/99 144122 $716.84 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 144492 $26.14 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 144941 $79.43 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 12/30/99 144943 $80.34 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C LIQUOR 12/30/99 144968 $52.10 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 145280 $2.30 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor & Mise 12/30/99 147662 $53.40 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor & Mise 12/30/99 147662 $2.845.27 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Mise 12/30/99 147665 $26.44 . 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Wine 12/30/99 147666 $473.16 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor & Mise 12/30/99 147667 $78.93 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor& Mise 12/30/99 147667 $1.325.51 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/30/99 147680 $327.90 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 147681 $435.84 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 525180 ($368.92) 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Wine 12/30/99 525683 ($8.54) 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 525775 ($42.50) 27143 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liq 12/30/99 525785 ($34.00) 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/30/99 525789 ($76.50) 27143 GRIGGS, COOPER & C CORRECT MISFILLED ORDER 12/30/99 526464 ($3.64) TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $9,877.96 27144 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor &Wine 12/30/99 1055772 $649.03 27144 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor &Wine 12/30/99 1055772 $865.20 27144 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 1055773 $1,842.54 27144 JOHNSON BROS LIQU WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 1055773 $2.870.35 27144 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor & Wine 12/30/99 1055774 $806.10 27144 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Liquor & Wine 12/30/99 1055774 $916.78 TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $7,950.00 ali..ll.-; 1 Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 70f8 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amollnt 27145 LAKE REGION VENDIN Cigarettes 12/30/99 7792 $408.15 27145 LAKE REGION VENDIN CIGARETTES 12/30/99 7835 $299.31 ~7145 LAKE REGION VENDIN CIGARETTES 12/30/99 71137 $272.10 TOTAL FOR LAKE REGION VENDING $979.56 27146 LEEF BROS RUG RENTAL 12/30/99 131824 $27.51 TOTAL FOR LEEF BROS $27. 51 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 12/30199 102999ST1 $55.68 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 12/30/99 102999ST1 $55.67 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 102999ST2 $52.70 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 102999ST2 $52.70 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 113099ST1 $39.52 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 113099ST1 $39.53 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 113099STMT $73.95 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 113099STMT $73.95 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12/30/99 113099TBST $31.02 27147 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 12130/99 113099TBST $31.03 TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING $505.75 27148 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/30/99 560282 $609.55 27148 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/30/99 560283 $1,941.56 . 27148 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & wine 12/30199 560284 $168.85 27148 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & wine 12/30/99 560284 $136.95 TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $2,856.91 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/30/99 784344-00 ($50.12) 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786580-00 $242.57 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786580-00 $336.60 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786665-00 $557.39 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786665-00 $763.04 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786680-00 $1,790.13 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE/LIQUOR 12/30/99 786680-00 $1,529.05 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/30/99 786908-00 $10.85 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/30/99 788836-00 $72.47 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/30199 788877-00 $1,139.68 27149 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/30/99 788878-00 $1,560.61 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $7,952.27 27150 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER/MISC 12/30/99 180792 $32.30 . 27150 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEERlMISC 12130199 180792 $1,912.10 27150 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER/MISC 12/30/99 181273 $40.40 27150 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER/MISC 12/30/99 181273 $1,103.15 TOTAL FOR THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPA $3,087.95 27151 WORLD CLASS WINES. Wine 12/30/99 88322 $448.00 TOTAL FOR WORLD CLASS WINES,INC $448.00 27152 GREER, MICHAEL A. ESCROW REFUND 6065 CHASKA R 12/30/99 $1,800.00 TOTAL FOR GREER, MICHAEL A. $1,800.00 TOTAL CHECKS $217,159.23 ..-""l 1r Thursday, January 06, 2000 . Page 8 0[8 Payroll Register Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 215060 LEDWITH JAMES R 64.42 12/21/99 215061 LIZEE CHRISTINE G 184.70 12/21/99 215062 LOVE CLIFFORD W 219.84 12/21/99 215063 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 859.82 12/21/99 215064 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 12/21/99 215065 MASON BRADLEY J 903.71 12/21/99 215066 MITL YNG SARA J 259.93 12/21/99 215067 NAAB THERESA L 685.77 12/21/99 215068 NICCUM LAWRENCE A 1,192.98 12/21/99 215069 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 958.79 12/21/99 215070 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,243.29 12/21/99 215071 PERSSON MICHAEL J 249.07 12/21/99 215072 POUNDER CHRISTOPHER J 990.08 12/21/99 . 215073 RANDALL DANIEL J 962.60 12/21/99 215074 RICH MELANY M 452.89 12/21/99 215075 ROLEK ALAN J 1,200.04 12/21/99 215076 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 496.23 12/21/99 215077 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 870.06 12/21/99 215078 STOVER KRIST! 184.70 12/21/99 215079 SW ANDBY DONALD R 992.03 12/21/99 215080 ZERBY MICHAEL S 184.70 12/21/99 215081 ANDERSON JOEL L 162.22 12/21/99 215082 BASTYR CONNIE D 841.42 12/21/99 215083 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,677.16 12/21/99 215084 BOOL SUSAN E 101.62 12/21/99 215085 CARIGNAN DEANN M 60.84 12/21/99 . 215086 DAVIS CHARLES S 945.17 12/21/99 215087 DUFFY DAVID C 125.25 12/21/99 215088 EISCHENS JAMES E 65.55 12/21/99 215089 FLORA CHERI L 198.61 12/21/99 215090 GARFUNKEL JOHN J 184.70 12/21/99 215091 GROUT TWILA R 726.75 12/21/99 215092 HEBERT KATHLEEN A 320.66 12/21/99 215093 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 630.41 12/21/99 215094 HELLING PAMELA J 639.37 12/21/99 215095 HEURKINS MARK K 154.06 12/21/99 215096 HURM JAMES C 1,815.65 12/21/99 215097 JAKEL BRIAN D 234.24 12/21/99 215098 JOHNSON DENNIS D 974.42 12/21/99 215099 KALLESTAD STEPHEN N 461.04 12/21/99 215100 LATTERNER SUSAN M 355.67 12/21/99 Tuesday, December 21,1999 Page 1 of2 . . Payroll Register Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 215102 ANDERSON JOEL L 112.72 1/4/00 215103 ANDERSON NICHOLAS P 36.01 1/4/00 215104 AUSTIN TAYLOR B 13.85 1/4/00 215105 BASTYR CONNIE D 226.74 1/4/00 215106 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,682.94 1/4/00 215107 CARIGNAN DEANN M 44.74 1/4/00 215108 DAVIS CHARLES S 1,066.54 1/4/00 215109 DUFFY DAVID C 73.36 1/4/00 215110 EISCHENS JAMES E 258.12 1/4/00 215111 ELKE CATHERINE M 457.20 1/4/00 215112 GROUT TWILA R 761.80 1/4/00 215113 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 920.89 1/4/00 215114 HELLING PAMELA J 556.68 1/4/00 . 215116 HUTTNER JASON P 359.74 1/4/00 215117 JAKEL BRIAN D 145.91 1/4/00 215118 JOHNSON DENNIS D 953.40 1/4/00 215119 KALLEST AD STEPHEN N 854.38 1/4/00 215120 LATTERNER SUSAN M 532.80 1/4/00 215121 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 943.05 1/4/00 215122 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 1/4/00 215123 MASON BRADLEY J 885.62 1/4/00 215124 MITL YNG SARA J 275.86 1/4/00 215125 NICCUM LAWRENCE A 1,196.79 1/4/00 215126 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 944.86 1/4/00 215127 OLSEN MAX R 12.03 1/4/00 215128 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,227.28 1/4/00 . 215129 PERSSON MICHAEL J 187.68 114/00 215130 POUNDER CHRISTOPHER J 1,219.73 1/4/00 215131 RANDALL DANIEL J 1,122.62 1/4/00 215132 RICH MELANY M 419.59 . 1/4/00 215133 ROLEK ALAN J 1,197.70 1/4/00 215134 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 496.61 1/4/00 215135 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 871.29 1/4/00 215136 SW ANDBY DONALD R 995.83 1/4/00 215137 HURM JAMES C 10,216.04 1/4/00 Total of Checks 531,370.50 Thursday, January 06, 2000 Page 1 of1