121399 CC Reg AgP
#~~
'@.~. ,-
.
cITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 13,1999
SCANN!,D
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 PM.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor Love
Stover
Garfunkel
Lizee
Zerby
B. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 6, 1999 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B. City Council Special Meeting Minutes December 6, 1999 (Att.-#2B Minutes)
C. City Council Executive Session Minutes December 6, 1999 (Att.-#2C Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA. Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt
Resolutions Therein:
A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Year 2000 Refuse Hauler Licenses
(Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution)
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Year 2000 Tree. Trimmer Licenses
(Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution)
C. A Motion Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement with ASFCME for the
Years 200012001(Att.-#3C Agreement)
NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removetlfrom the
Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or ques1ioRS as1cetlfollowillg
removal from Consent Agenda.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
~-t
~
.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. DECEMBER 13, 1999
PAGE20F2
5. PARKS - Report by Representative
Direction on Winter L TR Trail Maintenance
6. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A. 7:15 P.M. Public Hearing - Vacate DrainagelUtility Easements (Att.#6A,
Planner's Memorandum; Proposed Resolution)
Applicant: James Bruce
Location: 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trial
B. Consideration of A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Simple
Subdivision/Combination (Att.#6A, Planner's Memorandum; Proposed
Resolution)
Applicant: James Bruce
Location: 24075 and 24115 Mary Lake Trail
C Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Comprehensive
Plan (Att.-#6C Housing Chapter; Proposed Resolution)
7. GENERAL
A. Request for Donation for South Lake Area War Memorial (Ken Koehnen)(Att.-
#7A)
B. Consideration of A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2000 Budgets
and Approving the 1999 Property Tax Levy Collectible in 2000 (Att.-#7B
Proposed Resolution)
C. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing the 2000 Pay Scale
(Att.-#7C Proposed Resolution)
D. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1300-
Water and Sewer Rates (Att.-#7D Proposed Ordinance)
E. A Motion Considering the Hiring of a Senior Accounting Clerk and Update on
Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk Position (Att.-#7E)
F. Consideration of a Motion Authorizing the Creation of a Part-Time
Receptionist/Secretary Position and Authorizing Advertisement (Att.-#7F)
G. A Motion Accepting the Job Descriptions for SecretarylReceptionist Part-Time
and ReceptionistIPark Secretary (Att.-#7G Job Descriptions)
H. Consideration of Authorization for an Appraisal for the Gideon Glen Project
.~t-
..
,.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. DECEMBER 13, 1999
PAGE30F2
8. ENGINEERINGlPUBLIC WORKS
9. REPORTS:
A. Ad~ror&Smff
1. Project Reports
ii. Board on Innovation and Cooperation Preliminary Grant Applications
(Att.-#9A ii)
iii. Report on Light Request on Manor Road/St. Alban's Bay RdlSuburban
Drive
B. Mayor and City Council
10. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att.-#lO)
r
FROM .: .SEN lOR COMMUN I TY SERV I CES
PHONE NO. :541 11319
Shorewood Residents/ Council Members
and City Staff....
Yau are invited. . . . . .
To Shorewood Day at the
Southshore Center
On Friday/ January 21, 2000
At Noon
The Southshore Center will spotlight the five communities that
helped with getting the center built two years ago. A city wi [f
be highlighted each month with a special invitation extended to
the city residentsl council members and city staff. Everyone
from the area is invited to come for lunch" find out what is going
on in each community and celebrate OUT five-city Southshore
area. If you have not visited the center, this is a perfeCt time to
come and see this wonde-rfu[ community center. lunch
resewations can be made by calling the center at 474-7635.
Rides aTe available on the center van by caUing Dial-A- Ride at
474-744.1. The cost fOT lunch isa sussested donation of $2.2.5.
Office: 612-474-5222
Fax: 612-474-3514
M~ e,~ e~
Assn., Inc.
P. O. BOX 360
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
Golf Shop: 474-9571
December 13, 1999
3V
City of Shorewood
Attn: James Hurm, Administrator
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
.... ....._-"-~.,..".."-',...--._,,,..,.~---
Gentlemen:
Ref: Deer Problem on Golf Course
We are approaching a crisis relative to the existence of the Minnetonka Country Club in the
future. Our Golf Course Superintendent has informed me that the yearly increase in damage to
our greens over the past few years, by a herd of now 10-11 deer, has reached a point where he no
longer can maintain the normal playability of the greens which will adversely affect the retention
of our golf members.
It is an industry truism that a private golf course could have beautiful fairways, but if the greens
are not up to industry standards the course will fail with the land converted to other uses.
The deer damage the greens throughout the year by walking/running/stomping over them with
their sharp hooves slicing the turf and indenting the surface, making it impossible to putt
properly. We spend $8,000.00 each year to purchase flowers, etc., to improve the appearance of
the golf course and surrounding areas. The deer consume a large portion of the flowers, which
we have contended with, and is not a basis for our problem. The disappearance of flowers does
not affect our operation.
Minnetonka Country Club was established in 1916, with the present management in place since
1954. We are a commercial operation and the deer problem is critically affecting us. The City
of Maple Plain, among others, has permitted programs to correct deer problems. We respectfully
request the City of Shorewood to initiate whatever action is necessary to eliminate the problem.
Minnetonka Country Club will, of course, be happy to assist in any manner possible.
Sincerely,
Minnetonka Country ~ssn., Inc.
~~SA--~_,/
.....
B. Witrak, President
Housing Plan
Housing Condition and Maintenance
The LMACC Sub-Regional Housing Study, prepared in
1998 for the Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities,
suggests the possibility of a uniform housing maintenance
code for the participating communities as a means to
protect the existing housing stock. Shorewood's housing
condition survey suggests that housing maintenance
problems may not be prevalent enough to warrant such
action at this time. Nevertheless, the City may want to
consider some type of passive "truth in housing" approach
in the future. This type of regulation attempts to identify
certain deficiencies in housing at the time of sale, putting
buyers on notice of problems. The objective is to create an
incentive for property sellers to improve maintenance
conditions prior to the sale.
Often more noticeable than the condition of structures is the
outside maintenance of property. Shorewood has
historically addressed problem sites on a complaint basis.
Although this "neighborhood standard" method has worked
reasonably well, it is recommended that local nuisance
ordinances be reviewed and periodically updated. The
City's spring cleanup event is also viewed as an effective
tool for encouraging residents to maintain their property.
In 1993 the City adopted a rental housing code that affected
approximately 100 rental units in the city. This code
establishes standards and a licensing procedure for all types
of rental dwellings. The program has been successful in
that a number of rental units were improved. The City has
received no tenant complaints since the adoption of the
code. Continuation of this effort is recommended.
12-99
For many years Shorewood has allocated a portion of its
Community Development Block Grant funds for
rehabilitation of substandard housing. Hennepin County
administers this program. In 1995 and 1996 the City
budgeted $8270 and $7031, respectively, to provide grants
and low interest loans to people in need of assistance. In
recent years the City has pooled its CDBG funds with other
Hennepin County communities to more effectively address
housing rehabilitation. Not only is it suggested that the
program be continued, it is recommended that it and other
assistance programs be better publicized through the City
newsletter and information kiosks in the City offices.
HO-ll
---
,.
. ~
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SH<?REWOOD, MINNE~OTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cl.shorewood.mn.us . cltyhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, December 13, 1999
u--
.,....
'. ....
:.~ . .;':
Agenda Item #3A: This is an annual resolution passed to approve licenses for refuse collectors.
Agenda Item #3B: This is an annual resolution approving tree trimmer licenses.
!
Agenda Item #3C: This motion approves the two-year contract with ASFCME for the year 2000
and 2001. The motion would be to authorization execution. .
. .. :~
Agenda Item #6A: and 6B: Jim Bruce proposes to rearrange the lot lines between the lots at
24115 and 24075 Mary Lake Trail (see Agenda Item #6B). If approved the combination
and redivision will necessitate vacating existing easements on the lots and replacing them
with new ones. While this is somewhat of a "chicken and egg" situation, it has been
recommended by the Planning Director and the Planning Commission that the request be
approved subject to certain conditions. A public hearing is scheduled for 7: 15 to fIrst
consider the vacation of easements. Approval of this item requires a simple majority vote
by the Council.
It ~
.' .
".
.'~
,
,
'.J
" ..;.
:.
.
"+- .f<....
Agenda Item 6C: At last the fInal chapter of the Comprehensive Plan! After a public hearing
last Tuesday, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward the Housing
Chapter of the Comp Plan for review and approval by the City Council. The attached
resolution approves the Comprehensive Plan 2000 on an interim basis pending review by
adjoining cities and the Metropolitan Council. Approval requires a four-fIfths vote by the
Council.
c'
Agenda Item 7 A: Ken Koehnen has another meeting at the American Legion Monday evening.
He will come to the City Council meeting to give a brief presentation on the South Lake
War Memorial and then return to his other meeting. Written material is enclosed in the
packet. The request is' for $500 which could be designated to come from contingency.
ft -
~~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
Agenda Item 7B: On December 6, 1999 the City Council held its Truth-in-Taxation Public
Hearing for the Proposed 2000 Budget and 1999 payable 2000 Tax Levy. After a short
presentation, the public had the opportunity to comment on the proposed budget and levy.
The attached proposed resolution approves a fInal 2000 Budget and 1999/2000 Tax Levy.
The levy must be certified to the County Auditor by December 28.
.
Agenda Item 7C: During the 2000 budget process the Council discussed adjustments to city
employee salary ranges and the City's contribution toward the employee insurance plan.
The attached proposed resolution approves these adjustments to the pay ranges and sets
the City's insurance contribution at $447 per month per employee as budgeted. The
schedule accounts for a 2% increase in January and a 2% increase in July. If adopted, the
changes will be effective January 1,2000.
Agenda Item 7D: It was proposed in the 2000 budget presentation that water and sewer rates be
adjusted in 2000. This will be the first adjustment since 1993 for water and 1994 for
sewer. The attached proposed resolution approves an increase in the water rates by about
3.5% and a decrease in the sewer rates of 7.7%. If adopted, the new rates will be
effective January 1,2000.
.
Agenda Item 7E: The Council packet includes information on the recommendation for hiring for
the senior accounting clerk. A motion to approve the hiring of the recommended
candidate would be in order. A verbal update will be given on the status of the executive
secretary/deputy clerk search.
Agenda Item 7F: The Council is being asked to authorize the creation of part-time
receptionist/secretary position. This would replace the current full-time position. Details
and request for authorization for a technical assistant for engineering will be brought to
the Council in January.
Agenda Item 7G: Job descriptions have been drafted for the positions of secretary/receptionist
part-time and receptionist/secretary. Staff requests that Council accept these job
descriptions.
Agenda Item 7H: Staff will present to the Council a request to authorize funding for an appraisal
of property which will be needed for the Gideon Glen Project.
2
~
.
.
.
Agenda Item 9A ii: The deadline for the Minnesota Board of Innovation and Cooperation Grant
applications is Friday, December 17. Enclosed in the packet are the first drafts of a
number of grant applications. This is a preliminary round. We should hear by the end of
January aboutthe competitiveness of each ofthe applications. Details would then need to
be worked out on those applications, which would be submitted for a final round. More
commitments would need to made and details worked out by the end of March. The
request at this time is for the Council to review the applications and give an indication as
to whether preliminary applications should be submitted.
'f
3
.... A
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1999
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
O P. !\ 1:._. T-
.~. . r
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7 :00 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Stover and Zerby; City
Administrator Hunn; City Attorney Keane; Finance Director Rolek; Planning
Director Brad Nielson
Absent: None
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Love read the Agenda for December 6, 1999. Councilmember Stover requested Item 3B
be considered as part ofItem 7. Administrator Hurm requested adding discussion of a war
memorial as part ofItem 9B. The agenda was accepted as amended.
Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, accepting the agenda as amended. Motion passed 5/0.
C. Presentation of Appreciation to Park Commissioner Mary Bensman
Mayor Love presented Mary Bensman with a plaque of appreciation for her seven years of
service on the Park Commission. He thanked her for her time, thinking, and thoughtfulness
during her service. Commissioner Bensman stated it had been a pleasure and an honor to serve
on the Commission.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 22, 1999
Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded, approving the Regular Meeting Minutes
for November 22, 1999, as submitted. Motion passed 5/0.
B. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes November 22, 1999
Lizee moved, Stover seconded, approving the Executive Session Meeting
Minutes for November 22, 1999, as submitted. Motion passed 5/0.
~~A
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1999
PAGE20F4
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded, approving the Motions contained on the Consent
Agenda & Adopting the Resolutions Therein:
A. A Motion Approving an Agreement for Rink Supervisory Services
B. A Motion Authorizing the Hiring of an Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk
and Senior Accounting Clerk (Removed from the Consent Agenda and
moved to Item 7.)
C. A Motion Adopting Resolution No. 99~104," A Resolution Approving a
Conditional Use Permit for Six~Foot Fence in Setback Area for Kirk Dickey,
3221 Highway 7, Chanhassen."
D.
A Motion Adopting Resolution No. 99~105, "A Resolution Approving a
Variance for Two Houses on One Lot for Kim Koehnen, 6115 Seamans
Drive. "
E. A Motion Adopting Resolution No. 99-106. "A Resolution Approving a
Preliminary Plat-Seamans Estates for Kim Koehnen, 6115 Seamans Drive."
F. A Motion Adopting Resolution No. 99-107, "A Resolution Approving
a Conditional Use Permit for Substandard Lot in Shoreland District
for Leo Slechta, 4205 Enchanted Lane."
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor.
5. P ARKS ~ Report by Representative
Administrator Hurm noted there was nothing to report as there was not a Park Commission
meeting prior to this Council meeting.
6. PLANNING ~ Report by Representative
Planning Director Nielson noted there was nothing to report as there was not a Planning
Commission meeting prior to this Council meeting.
.. '"
.
.
.f,.~.~ ~'1
.
.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1999
PAGE30F4
7. GENERAL
A. A Motion Authorizing the Hiring of an Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk
and Senior Accounting Clerk (This item was removed from the Consent
Agenda for discussion and consideration.)
Councilmember Stover stated she thought the wording on this motion was not clear in its intent.
Council agreed to postpone discussion of this motion until the December 13, 1999, City Council
meeting.
8. ENGINEERINGIPUBLIC WORKS
Administrator Hurm noted there was nothing to report at this time.
9. REPORTS:
A.
Administrator & Staff
i. Report on Smith town Road Right~f~Way Project
Attorney Keane reported research on this issue is complete. Public Works Director Brown is
compiling this report prior to presentation to Council.
Mayor Love recessed the meeting at 7: 15 P.M. to convene a special meeting on the Truth in
Taxation Public Hearing.
The Regular City Council Meeting reconvened at 7:41 P.M.
ii.
Project Reports
Mayor Love stated he requested Project Reports become part of the Regular Meeting agenda in
an effort to keep dialogue and public awareness current with the projects.
Administrator Hurm reported survey information will be available within the next few days on
the Gideon Glen project.
Councilmember Zerby requested an update on the Smithtown Road Right-of-Way Project.
Mayor Love reported the City of Tonka Bay voted to table a decision on this matter with the idea
that there would be meetings between the two cities-Tonka Bay and Shorewood--to arrive at
possible conclusions to this situation. Meetings are expected to take place in February, 2000. In
an effort to allow these discussions to take place, Love noted, the anticipated project completion
dates in 2000 have been set aside.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1999
PAGE40F4
iii. Resignation of Dave Gosen from the Land Conservation and
Environment Committee
Mayor Love stated he would like to thank Mr. Gosen for time dedicated to this committee.
B. Mayor and City Council
Mayor Love reported he received a call from Mr. Ken Koehnen. Mr. Koehnen is interested in
creating a war memorial to be erected possibly at the Port of Excelsior commemorating the
soldiers of World Wars I and II, the KoreanWar, and the Vietnam War. Mr. Koehnen is
contacting neighboring cities about making a contribution toward this memorial. Discussion for
this item will be part of the December 13 City Council Agenda.
Mayor Love also reported on matters considered and the actions taken at the November 23 Fire
Review Committee Meeting.
Councilmember Lizee reported she had received a phone call from a citizen concerned about the .
lack of illumination at the intersection of Manor Road/St. Alban's Bay Road/Suburban Drive
near Manor Park. Mayor Love noted that citizen petition is the usual manor to bring up such
Issues
Mayor Love questioned the status of the light meter at the Amoco station. Hurm reported that
changes had been made and need to be checked to comply with Code regulations.
10. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, adjourning the regular meeting to Executive Session at 7:50
P.M. to cover personnel matters subject to approval of claims. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
James C. Burm, City Administrator
~
.
~
CITY OF SBOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1999
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:15 P.M.
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7: 15 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Stover and Zerby; City
Administrator Hurm; Finance Director Rolek; Planning Director Brad
Nielson
Absent: None
.
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Love read the Agenda for December 6, 1999. The agenda was approved as
submitted.
2. 7:15 P.M. - TRUTB IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING
Mayor Love opened the Public Hearing.
.
Finance Director Rolek presented an overview of the process needed to develop the 2000
Operating Budget. The budget allocates funding to achieve priorities established by the
City Council and to maintain quality programs in the City. Many factors and variables
effect the preparation of the budget, while the City strives to continue to provide value in
municipal services to the citizens of Shorewood. These services are divided into different
funds.
The General Fund, which includes the goals for improvements in infrastructure and
equipment in maintaining the City, is expected to rise by approximately 4% from 1999 to
2000. In spite of the increased tax levy and legislative changes in property tax rates,
Shorewood residents should expect a decrease in City taxes. Shorewood's tax rate is
among the lowest 25% of cities within Hennepin County.
The Water Fund has two subfunds- Water Operations and Water Debt Service. There is
an increase this year in the Operations Fund due to the West End Watermain Loop
project. For the first time since 1993, an increase of 4% is proposed in water rates for
residents. Government agencies are encouraging City residents to conserve water.
Because of this, a tiered usage plan for water consumption is being proposed for 2000.
For example, residents could expect a typical quarterly change for 30,000 gallons of water
*;.6\
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1999
PAGE20F2
usage to increase from $51.50 to $53.25. Seventy-five thousand gallons of water usage
would increase from approximately $120.75 to $127.00 in the year 2000 under the tiered
plan.
The Sewer Fund expects the Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program will continue as
well as the Lift Station Refurbishing Program at a rate of two lift stations being
refurbished a year. Rolek also stated due to a reduction in treatment costs, sewer rates for
residents will decrease by 7.69%.
The Recycling Fund is expected to remain nearly the same in 2000 as it was in 1999.
No increase is expected in residential recycling fees for residents.
The Stormwater Management Fund includes an increase due to the funding for the
Gideon Glen drainage project. Only the City's anticipated costs have been budgeted from
this fund.
Director Rolek stated he believed Shorewood residents were getting good value for
services received from the City.
.
Mayor Love stated he would like to thank Director Rolek and staff for all the hard work
that went into preparation of the budget.
There were no public comments. The Public Hearing was closed. It was noted that action
on the proposed budget and levy would take place at the December 13 council meeting.
Lizee moved, Stover seconded, adjourning the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing at
7:40 P.M. Motion passed 5/0.
3. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
.
Sally Keefe,
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION
MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1999
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
8:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING
f). [} ..M. -1. t~. T
- ~.:;. !.A.
. .....
Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M.
A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Garfunkel, Lizee, Stover and Zerby; City
Administrator Hurm
Absent: None
B. Review Agenda
2.
DISCUSSION ON PERSONNEL MATTERS
Following individual reviews of City Attorney proposals it was a consensus that the
following firms would be asked to interview with the City Council on December 15:
. Kennedy Graven
. Hinshaw & Culbertson
. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren
At 8:27 p.m. the council took a ten-minute break. Administrator Hurm left the meeting.
The Council discussed the Administrators review.
3.
ADJOURN
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.rn.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
James C. Durm
Recording Secretary
Woody Love, Mayor
James C. Durm, City Administrator
~~t
1
1
I
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSES FOR REFUSE COLLECTORS
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code Section 507.05 provides for the annual
licensing of refuse collectors in the City; and
WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant shall complete an application
and fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and
WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed this
application and fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a License for Refuse
Collection.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood
as follows:
That a License for Refuse Collection be issued for a term of one year, from
January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, to the following applicants:
Permit #
00-011
Firm Name
Blackowiak & Son
Address
1195 Sunnyfield Rd N.
Mound, MN 55364
00-012
Waste Technology Inc. 5232 Hanson Court
Crystal, MN 55428
00-013
Chaska Sanitation
731 Victoria Dr
Chaska, MN 55318
00-014
Veit Container Corp. 14000 Veit Place
Rogers, MN 55374
00-015
Waste Management 12448 Pennsylvania Ave S
Savage,MN 55378
00-016
BPI 9813 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
3,<<\
Resolution No. 99-
Page 2
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 13th day of
December, 1999.
ATTEST:
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSES FOR TREE TRIMMERS
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code Section 305 provides for the annual
licensing of tree trimmers in the City; and
WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant submit a letter of intent and
fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and
WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed this process
. and have submitted the requirements for the issuance of a License for Tree Trimmers.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood
as follows:
That a License for Tree Trimming be issued for a term from January 1,2000 to December
31, 200, to the following applicants:
Permit #
Firm Name
Address
00-004
Shorewood Tree Residential Service
9715 Fenner Ave. SE
Delano, MN 55328
.
00-005
Shorewood Tree Service
14015 Co. Rd. 122
Watertown, MN 55388
00-006
Four Seasons Tree Service
32 10th Ave S, St 213
Hopkins, MN 55353
00-007
Aaspen Tree Service
970 West Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata, MN 55391
00-008
Da~yTreeExpertCompany
1500 N. Mantua St.
Kent, Ohio 44240
00-009
TreeCare, Inc.
P.O. Box 358
Shorewood,MN 55331
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 13th day of
December, 1999.
it 3~ I
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
.
.
TENTA TJVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF SHORE WOOD, MINNESOTA
AND
LOCAL 224, COUNCIL 14
OF THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND
l\tIUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
AFL-CIO
November 10. 1999
Additions are underlines. deletions are crossed out.
AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation. hereinafter referred to as the
EMPLOYER, - and LOCAL 224, COUNCIL 14, of the AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-
CIO, hereinafter referred to as the UNION.
JANUARY 1, 20001998 - DECEMBER 31, 2001m9
it 31!. f
Article
I
n
III
IV
V
VI
vn
VITI
IX
X
XI
xn
xrn
XIV
XV
XVI
xvn
XVllI
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
xxm
XXIV
XXV
XXVI
xxvn
xxvrn
XXVIV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pale
AGREEMENT ..... ... .................... .............. ... .... ...... ........ Cover
PURPOSE AND INTENT .............................................. 1
RECOGNITION ........ ............ ........................................... 1
DEFINITIONS .. ........ .......... ............. .......... ...................... 1
UNION SECURITY ........................................................... 1
EMPLOYER SECURITy.............................................. 2
EMPLOYER AUTHORITY ...........................................2
NON-DISCRIMINATION ................. ..........~.................. 2
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE .......................................... 2
SENIORITY ..... ...... ............................................... ......... 5
PROBATIONARY PERIOD ........................................... 5
JOB POSTING ................................................................. 6
LAYOFF AND RECALL .............................................. 6
WORK. SCHEDULES ......................................................... 6
SAVINGS CLAUSE ........................................................... 7
DISCIPLINE ....... ............. ............ ........................... ........ 7
RIGHI' OF SUBCONTRACT ....................................... 8
SICK LEAVE ............................................................... 8
SEVERANCE PAy........................................................ 8
FUNERAL LEAVE ........................................................ 8
IN"SURAN CE .................. ....... ............................. 9
VACATION .........................................................................9
HOLillA YS ................................................................. 10
LEA YES ............................................................................. 11
UNIFORMS ................................................................. 11
OVERTIME PAy............................................................ 11
pREMIUM PAy............................................................. 12
CALL BACKS ............................................................... 12
WAIVER ... ............ .................................................. ........... 12
DURATION AND EFFECfIVE DATES .......................12
APPEND IX A ................................................................ 14
SENIORITY ROSTER ................................................ 16
.
.
ARTICLE I . PURPOSE AND INTENT
It is the purpose of this AGREEMENT to establish certain wages, hours, and conditions
of employment, and to establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the
interpretation or application of the AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION
continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize
this AGREEMENT as a pledge of this dedication.
ARTICLE II . RECOGNITION
The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNION as the exclusive representative under
Minnesota Statutes, 179A.03, Subd. 8, for all employees of the Public Works Department
of the City of Shorewood whose service exceeds the lesser of fourteen (14) hours a week
or thirty-five_percent (35%) of the normal work week and more than sixty-seven (67)
days a year, excluding supervisory and confidential employees.
ARTICLE ill - DEFINITIONS
.
Section 1:
UNION: Local 224, Council 14 of the American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO.
Section 2:
EMPLOYER: The City of Shorewood.
Section 3:
UNION ME1\ffiER: A member of Local No. 224, Council 14 of the
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-
CIO.
Section 4:
EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit.
Section 5:
BASE PAY RATE: The employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of
longevity or any other special allowance.
.
Section 6:
SENIORITY: Length of continuous service in any of the job
classifications covered by ARTICLE II - RECOGNITION.
ARTICLE IV . UNION SECURITY
Section 1: In recognition of the UNION as the certified exclusive representative the
EMPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees, who authorize in writing such a
deduction, an amount sufficient to provide payment of dues established by the UNION.
Such monies shall be remitted to the appropriate designated Officer of the UNION.
Section 2: The UNION may designate one employee from the bargaining unit to act as
Steward and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice.
ltT
tt'Z
'l.N3W3ffiIDV S!lP }O SUO!S!AOld ~tp }O uO!lm~;ud.l~lU!
JO uO~:>Hdd~ ~tp U! S!~q p~UO!lU~Ul~O~ ~tp UO ~l~U!Ul!l:>S!p .LN3YaffiID'V
S!1Il 01 Almd J~tp!~ IJVn JOU 'UO!l~&1o Joqe[ ~ tp!M UO!l~H~-UOU JO UO!l~POS~-UOUJO
UO!l~!I1..t.JB JO UO!l~!~ 'S}~!I~ sno~!I~ JO ~:>!lHod '~:>u~l~}~d ~nx~s 'dB:>!p~q '~!l0
~UO!l-eu '~~~ 'JOIO:> ~ 'J~U~~ }O ~nB~ .LN3WtI'E.rnDV S!tp Aq p~J~AO:> ~~AOIdw~
A~ lSU~~~ ~l~ll!Ul!J:>S!p 10U IHM S;;)!:>nod ;;)A!l:>::ldS;;)ll!~tp ~tp ~~~ s~~d ~q~ : 1 uO!l:>~S
NOllVNll\1llI3S10-NON -llA 3'l3llHV
.
';;)~U!UlH;;) JO 'qS!lq~lS;;) 'hJ!POW 01 '8:EIAO'1cIWH
~tp }O UO!l~S!P ~tp ll!lP!M AI~IOS U~Ul~ ~qs .LN3WHffiIDV S!1Il Aq p~y!poW
JO p~qSHq~lS;;) AIJ-e:>Y~S 10U lU~UlAOIdm; }O UO!l!PUO:> p~ Ull~l AllY :z; uO!l:>~S
'.I..N3W3:ffilDV S!tp Aq p~l!Uln A~:>yp~ds
10U UO!pullJ ~!l~~~m 1U~~qu! A~ UllOJl::ld 01 p~ 's~Inp~q:>s )flOM qsnq~lS~
01 ~I~UUOSl~d }O J~UlnU ~tp ~U!Wl~~p p~ 'pal!P 'l:>aIas 01 ~~lm:>nl1S ~UO!l~Z!~~lO
~tp hJ!POW P~ qsnqmsa 01 ~~OIouq~l }O UOp-ez!{!ln ~tp aU!Ull~l~p 01 :Sl~~pnq pu~w-e
P~ l~SOl ~~OJd P~ SUO!l:>UI1J qS!lq~lsa 01 ~luamd!nba P~ 'S~!lm:>~} l~Mod~w t~
~~~~m P~ al~::ldo 011~!l p~P!l1SaIun p~ III1J aq1 SU~l~ '~EIAO'1cIW3: ~q~ : 1 UO!l:>~S
..u.mORLflV lIaAO'ldW3: - IA 3'l3Il.lIV
.
'~~req:>s!p ~U!pnI:>U! p~ 01 dn UO!1:>B Amundps!p lO} spuno~ ;q t~qs ~P!W S!tp }O
SUOP~IO!A "'MllOlcIW3: ~tp }O SUO!1:>UI1J I~UllOU alp tp!M a:>u~~palU! lO }O uopdnn~lU!
l~tpO JO 'UMOPMOIS '~)f!l1S A~ uoddns lO U! ~l~dppmd 'a~"BJno:>ua '~sn~:> 10U tnM A~ql
'.LNHWaffiIDV s!tpJO ~}n ~tp ~U!lnp ~q1;~ Sl~m~Ul Sl! p~ NOINfl ~~ :1 UO!1:>~S
A.I.nl!D3:SHaAOldW3: - A 3'l3llHV
'€ 'pqns '90'V6LI 'S.W Aq pap!AOld ~ '"a.mqs J!~},,}O uOP~:>Hdd~
~ql ~splax; NOIND. ~tp PInoqs AIdd~ OS~ A1mq~!I S,'8:3:AO'1cIW3: ~tp uo suopulIWH
~ql l~ql ~m~ P~ ~~o:>aI '8:3:AOlcIW3: ~q1 P~ NOINfl ~tp 'l~tplnd '~P!W S!ql
}O SUO!S!AOld ~lp J~pun '8:3:AO'1cIW3: ~q1 Aq ua~l 10U JO ua~l uo!l:>~ A~ }O lIns~J -e s-e
'8:aAOlcIW3: ~tp lSU~~ panss! JO lqgnOJq Sluampnf lO 'Sl;PlO 'Sl!nS 'sw~P t~ p~ A~
lSU~~~ ss~~q '8:3:AOlcIW3: ~ql Ploq pIrn hJ!umapu! 01 s;m~ NOINfl ~~ :17 UO!l:>~S
'NOINfl ~tp}O S~!:>mo ~lll!odd"B lO P;l:>;I; 01 ;:>U;;)sq~}O ~A~aI P!~dun U~ 'Mut
Aq p;J!nbaI S~ ''yO ~W!1~Iq~U~aI 1~ 'lsanbal uo 'I~qs 'MaAOlcIW3: a~ :€ UO!1:>~S
ARTICLE VIII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Section 1: Definitions:
a. Grievance: "Grievance" means any dispute or disagreement between the
EMPLOYER and the employee(s) concerning the intetpretation,
application, or violation of the specific terms and/or conditions of this
AGREEMENT.
b. Calendar Days: "Calendar days" for putposes of Article VITI means
calendar days excluding holidays as defined by the Agreement. In
computing any period of time, pursuant to this grievance procedure, the
day or act or event upon which a period of time begins to run shall not be
included.
c. Service: "Service" means personal delivery or service by certified mail.
d.
Reduced to Writing: "Reduced to writing" means a statement outlining
the nature of the grievance, the provision(s) of the Agreement in dispute
and the relief requested.
.
e. Answer: "Answer" means a response indicating the EMPLOYER'S
position on the grievance.
Section 2: Processing of a Grievance: It is recognized and accepted by the UNION and
the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by
the job duties and responsibilities of the EMPLOYEES and shall therefore be
accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such EMPLOYEE
duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved EMPLOYEE and the UNION Representative
shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is
investigated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided the
EMPLOYEE and the UNION Representative have notified and received approval of the
designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not
be detrimental to the work program of the EMPLOYER.
.
Section 3: Procedure: Grievances, as defined in ARTICLE VTII, Section 1., shall be
resolved in conformance with the following procedure:
Step I. An employee or employees claiming a grievance shall meet on an
informal basis with the employee's immediate supervisor as designated by the
EMPLOYER in an attempt to resolve the grievance within twenty-one (21)
calendar days after the grievance has occurred. The EMPLOYER-designated
representative will discuss and give an answer to the Step I grievance within ten
(10) calendar day after receipt. If the grievance is not resolved, it may be reduced
to writing by the exclusive representative and served upon the EMPLOYER-
designated Step II representative. Service must be made within ten (10) calendar
J.ff
.
.
days after the EMPLOYER-designated representative's final answer in Step 1.
Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step II by the UNION within ten (10)
calendar days shall be considered waived.
,-
Step II. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and
discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step II representative. The
EMPLOYER-designated representative shall give the UNION the
EMPLOYER'S Step II answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after
receipt of such Step II grievance. If a resolution of the grievance results, the terms
of that resolution shall be written on or attached to the grievance and shall be
signed by the EMPLOYER and the UNION. If no agreement is reached the
exclusive representative may proceed with the grievance by appealing to Step ill
within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated
representative's final Step II answer. The appeal shall indicate the intention of the
UNION to proceed with the grievance, a statement of the grievance, the
provision(s) of the Agreement in dispute, and the relief requested. Any grievance
not appealed in writing to Step ill by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days
shall be considered waived.
Step ill. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION
and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step ill Representative. The
EMPLOYER-designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S
answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step ill
grievance. If a resolution of the grievance results, the resolution shall be reduced
to writing as provided in Step II. A grievance not resolved in Step ill may be
appealed to Step IV or directly to Step V within ten (10) calendar days following
the EMPLOYER-designated representative's final answer in Step ill. Any
grievance not appealed in writing to Step IV or directly to Step V by the UNION
within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step IV. A grievance unresolved in Step ill not appealed directly to Step V but
appealed in Step IV shall be submitted within the designated time limit to the
Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services with notice provided to the
EMPLOYER. If a resolution of the grievance results, the resolution shall be
reduced to writing as provided in Step II. A grievance not resolved in Step IV may
be appealed to Step V within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER'S
final answer in Step IV. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step V by the
UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step V. A grievance unresolved in Step ill or Step IV and appealed in Step V
may be submitted to arbitration. The EMPLOYER and the UNION shall
endeavor to select a mutually acceptable arbitrator to hear and decide the
grievance. If the EMPLOYER and the UNION are unable to agree on an
arbitrator, they may request from the Director of the Bureau of Mediation
Services, State of Minnesota, a list of five (5) names. The parties shall alternately
strike names from the list of five (5) arbitrators until only one (1) name remains.
~+1-
The remaining arbitrator shall be requested to hear and decide the grievance. The
determination of which party will commence the striking process by a flip of a
COIn.
Section 4: Arbitrator's Authority:
A. The arbitrator shall not have the power to add to, delete from, ignore,
nullify or to modify in any way the terms and conditions of the existing
AGREEi\/fENT. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific
issue(s) submitted in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION, and
shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so
submitted. The arbitrator's decision shall be based solely on the
arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this
AGREEMENT and to the facts of the grievance presented.
B.
The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on all parties to the
dispute unless the decision is contrary to, inconsistent with, in violation of,
or in any way varying from any provision of the laws of Minnesota or
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or municipal charters or
ordinances or resolutions enacted pursuant thereto, or which causes a
penalty to be incurred thereunder. The arbitrator's decision shall be issued
to the parties in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the
hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later,
unless the parties agree to an extension.
c.
The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall
be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each
party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and
witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it
may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If
both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings the cost shall be
shared equally.
Section 5: Waiver: If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above,
it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the
specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the
basis of the EMPLOYER'S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a grievance
or an appeal thereof within the specific time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the
grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step.
The parties, by mutual agreement, may waive any step and extend any time limits in the
grievance procedure.
5.+T
.
.
.
.
ARTICLE IX - SENIORITY
Section 1: Seniority is defined as length of continuous service in any job classification
covered by ARTICLE II - RECOGNITION. Any former employee of the EMPLOYER
who has terminated may be rehired only under the conditions of a new employee and no
credit will be given for prior service.
Section 2: Employees who are promoted from a job classification covered by this
AGREEMENT and return to a job classification covered by this AGREEMENT shall
have their length of service under this AGREEMENT for purposes of promotion, transfer,
and layoff.
Section 3: Seniority shall be calculated as total continuous length of service with the
EMPLOYER for other benefits under this AGREEMENT.
Section 4: The EMPLOYER will maintain an up-to-date seniority roster. An up-to-date
copy of the seniority roster will be posted at least once each year and a copy will be
provided to the UNION. The names of all regular full-time and any part-time members
of the bargaining unit who have completed their probationary periods shall be listed on
the seniority roster in the order of their seniority and shall show the date from which
seniority commences and the employee's job title. Regular part-time employees
seniority shall be pro-rated on their hours of work as a percentage of a forty (40) hour
work week.
Section 5: An employee's seniority shall be terminated:
a. If the employee resigns, retires, is transferred outside the bargaining unit
or is discharged; or
b.
If, when recalled to work following a layoff, the employee fails to report
to work in accordance with ARTICLE XII - LA YOFF and RECALL; or
c. A temporary transfer outside the bargaining unit shall not terminate the
employee's seniority under Section 5, a.
Section 6: Employees who fail to report for work without notification to the supervisor
for three (3) consecutive work days shall be considered to have resigned from
employment.
ARTICLE X - PROBATIONARY PERIOD
Section 1: A probationary employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the
EMPLOYER during the probationary period.
n-rr
Section 2: All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a six (6) months'
probationary period. During the probationary period, the newly hired or rehired
employee shall have no seniority status.
Section 3: For newly hired or rehired employees at the end of the probationary period,
the City Administrator will recommend for Council consideration one (1) of two (2)
actions:
a. Termination of the employee, or
b. Regular employment status.
Section 4: All employees will serve a six (6) months' probationary period in any job
classification in which the employee has not served a probationary period.
Section 5: The employee shall be demoted or reassigned at the sole discretion of the
EMPLOYER to the position held previously or to a comparable position if, at any time .
during the probationary period the performance of a promoted or reassigned employee is
unsatisfactory or if the employee so requests. Such action shall not be subject to the
grievance procedure.
ARTICLE XI - JOB POSTING
Section 1: All job openings shall be posted for ten (10) calendar days.
Section 2: The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree that regular job vacancies within the
designated bargaining unit shall be filled based on the concept of promotion from within
provided that applicants:
a.
have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy;
and
b. have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job
vacancy.
Section 3: The EMPLOYER has the right of final decision in the selection of employees
to fill posted jobs based on qualifications, abilities and experience.
Section 4: Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers and promotions when
all job-relevant qualification factors are equal.
Section 5: Employees filling a higher job class based on the provisions of this ARTICLE
shall be subject to the conditions of ARTICLE X - PROBATIONARY PERIOD.
ITf
.
.
.
ARTICLE XII . LAYOFF AND RECALL
Section 1: Seniority will be the determining criterion for lay-off and recall only when the
job-relevant qualification factors are equal. Recall rights under this provision will
continue for twenty-four (24) months after layoff. Recalled employees shall have twelve
(12) work days after notification of recall by registered mail at the employee's last known
address to report to work or forfeit all recall rights.
ARTICLE XIII . WORK SCHEDULES
Section 1: The sole authority in work schedules is the EMPLOYER. The normal work
day for an employee shall be eight (8) hours. The normal work week shall be forty (40)
hours Monday through Friday.
Section 2: Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some
employees on a daily, weekly, seasonal, or annual basis other than the normal 7:00 - 3:30
day. The EMPLOYER will give seven (7) days advance notice to the employees affected
by the establishment of work days different from the employee's normal eight (8) hour
work day.
Section 3: In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as
(but not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet or breakdown of municipal equipment or
facilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee working
other than the normal work day be scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours, however,
each employee has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested unless
unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working.
Section 4: Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that
schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays.
ARTICLE XIV . SA VINGS CLAUSE
This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota,
and the City of Shorewood. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be
held to the contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final
judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision of
this AGREEMENT shall be voided. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the
request of either party. All other provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
ARTICLE XV . DISCIPLINE
Section 1: The EMPLOYER will discipline employees for just cause only.
Section 2: Discipline, when administered, will be in one of the following forms:
a. Oral reprimand;
.8.Tf
b. Written reprimand;
c. Suspension;
d. Demotion; or
e. Discharge.
Section 3: An employee who is reprimanded in wntmg, suspended, demoted or
discharged shall be furnished with a copy of such disciplinary action. A copy of any
such disciplinary action shall also be furnished to the exclusive representative.
Section 4: At the employee's request, the EMPLOYER shall remove all references to
disciplinary action in the personnel record in the following manner:
a. Written reprimands after two years with no similar occurrences.
b. References to suspensions and demotions after five years with no similar
occurrences.
ARTICLE XVI - RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT
.
Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit or restrict the right of the EMPLOYER
from subcontracting work performed by employees covered by this AGREEMENT. The
employer agrees to provide notice to the UNION and all employees at least ninety days
prior to subcontracting any work performed by employees covered by this
AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE xvm - SEVERANCE PAY
1
I
ARTICLE XVII - SICK LEA VE
Section 1: Sick leave shall be earned by regular, full-time employees at the rate of eight
(8) hours per month of service. There is no maximum accumulation of earned sick
leave. Use of employees' accrued sick leave may be used by employees as provided for
under the conditions of the Family Medical Leave Act or any other governing law .
.
Section 2: An employee who is receiving Workers' Compensation payments and who is
being fully compensated by the EMPLOYER will turn over all Workers' Compensation
payments to the EMPLOYER upon receipt of such benefits.
Section 3: Regular, part-time employees will receive paid sick leave on a pro-rata basis.
Section 1: Regular, full-time employees who leave the municipal service in good
standing after giving at least two (2) weeks' advance notice shall receive severance pay in
accordance with Section 3.
I
Section 2: Conditions of severance from municipal employment under which regular
empioyees will be eligible to receive severance pay are as follows:
2:ft
1
,
l'
a. Elimination of the employee's job by EMPLOYER;
b. Retirement;
c. Mandatory retirement or termination of employment due to health reasons,
service-connected injury or illness; or
d. Resignation in good standing.
Section 3: Eligible employees shall receive payment for one-third (1/3) of unused
accumulated sick leave which is in excess of three hundred and fifty (350) fOtlr htlndrcd
f4B6t hours upon severance of employment with the EMPLOYER. Such payment shall
be made based on the employee's hourly rate at the time of severance from employment
times the number of hours in excess of three hundred and fifty (350) rour htlndrcd (4f)())
hours of unused accumulated sick leave.
ARTICLE XIX - FUNERAL LEAVE
.
Section I: Upon notice to the immediate supervisor, all regular, full-time employees shall
be granted five (5) paid days of leave for death or funerals in the immediate family.
Immediate family is defined as spouse, children, parents, siblings. grandparents,
corresponding in-laws and corresponding step relatives.
Section 2:
A. Upon notice to the immediate supervisor, all regular, full-time employees
shall be granted two (2) days of leave for death or funerals of other family
members. Other family members shall be defined as aunts, uncles, nieces,
nephews and cousins.
B. Upon notice to the immediate supervisor, one (1) day of leave shall be
granted for death or funerals of other relatives or friends.
.
c.
Leave as granted in this section shall be deducted from that employee's
accrued sick leave, vacation, personal leave, comp time or may be without
pay.
ARTICLE XX . INSURANCE
Section I: The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum amount per month. as
determined by formula herein. per reiUlar full-time em,plovee for woup insurance.
includin~ dependent covera~e. The maximum employer contribution shall be determined
by the fonowin~ formula: avera~e family health premium plus hi~hest family de~tal
premium plus short term disability and life insurance premium x .67. 4 mtI:X'imtIm of
$353.00 per ftlontft pel regular ftlll-timc emplOyee for ,grotlp inStlHmeC, .i:ncltlding
dependent COt'Grage for cltkndar yeM' 1998. Dental insurance shall be available to
employees within the maximum contributed by the EMPLOYER. The :eMPLOYER
contribution fOl co iClllgC tl:3 pIO v ided in this section [01 thc YC.ti 1999 shall be $353.00
J..{Wf
plus 50% of the l\.YCIil:gC fanlil) plan plCITIltlnl InCIC~G over [998 AvClagc fttlHily
prcruiurn of $498.47.
Section 2: The insurance carrier shall be selected by the EMPLOYER.
Section 3: Deductibility of insurance premiums as pre-tax dollars for employees covered
by this Agreement shall be available as permitted by Internal Revenue Service
regulations.
Section 4: In accordance with M.S. Statute 471.61, Subd. 2b an employee who elects to
retire early shall be allowed to continue to participate in the EMPLOYER'S group health
insurance plan at the employee's expense.
ARTICLE XXI .. VACATION
Section 1: Accrual for Regular, Full-Time Employees. Regular full-time employees
shall accrue paid vacation on the following basis:
.
Length of Continuous Service
Start through 5 years
Beginning 6 through 9 years
Beginning 10 through 19 years
Beginning 20 years and over
Accrued Vacation Hours
96 Hours (8 hours/month)
120 Hours (10 hours/month)
160 Hours (13.333 hrs./month)
200 Hours (16.667 hrs./month)
Section 2: Length of Continuous Service. Length of continuous service for the purpose
'of determining vacations is calculated from the date of full-time employment with the
EMPLOYER.
Section 3: Probationary Employees. Probationary employees may accrue paid
vacation time but shall not be allowed to take vacation leave until after completion of the
initial probationary period.
.
Section 4: Choice of Vacation and Prior Approval Required. Preference in choosing
vacation time is given on the basis of length of continuous service for the first ten (10)
days (80 hours) of vacation. An employee with more than ten (10) days (80 hours) of
accrued vacation will be allowed to choose additional vacation time only after all other
regular, full-time employees have made their initial choices. Preference in choosing
vacation time beyond the initial selection will be given on the basis of length of
continuous service. Vacation leave may only be taken after prior approval has been
granted by the EMPLOYER-designated representative.
Section 5: Vacation Salary Advance. Employees may request vacation salary in
advance for the period during which they will be away. A vacation salary advance
request must be submitted by the employee to the EMPLOYER-designated representative
one (1) week in advance of the vacation period.
11H
Section 6: Pay in Lieu of Vacation. Employees continuing in the EMPLOYER'S
employment shall not be given pay in lieu of vacation. All vacation must be taken prior
to the separation of an employee from employment except in the case of retirement due to
disability .
Section 7: Vacation Carry Over. Each emplovee may can:y over to the next year a
number of vacation days based on the folIowini formula: two (2) times the annual rate of
accrual on December 31. Cmplo,cc~ nUt) call') () vcr up to tcn (10) cia) ~ (80 hours) of
vttCltt10n into the next cA1cndM }eaf.
Section 8: Pro-Rata Vacation. Regular, part-time employees will receive paid vacation
on a pro-rata basis.
ARTICLE XXII . HOLIDAYS
.
Section 1: Paid Holidays: Regular, full-time employees shall be provided with the
following paid holidays:
.
Holidays
New Year's Day
Martin Luther King's Birthday Day
Presidents' Day
Memorial Day
Fourth of July
Labor Day
Columbus Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Eve (one-half day)
Christmas Day
Good Friday
When Observed
January 1
Third Monday in January
Third Monday in February
Last Monday in May
July 4
First Monday in September
Second Monday in October
November 11
FourthThursd~inNo~mber
December 24
December 25
One half day the Friday before
Easter Sunday
Prior Approval Required
Personal Leave Day
Section 2: Personal Leave Day. An employee may take the personal leave day with
the prior approval of the EMPLOYER-designated representative. An employee shall
request the personal leave day at least three (3) calendar days in advance. This
requirement may be waived with the prior approval of the EMPLOYER-designated
representative.
Section 3: Certain Holidays Falling on Saturday and Sunday. When New Year's Day
(January I), Independence Day (July 4) or Christmas Day (December 25) fall on Sunday,
the following day shall be observed as a holiday. When New Year's Day, Independence
Day, or Christmas Day fall on Saturday, the preceding day shall be observed as a holiday.
liB-
HIT
"~lq'B:>p:>lUd SB AlT1mb~ SB Palnqp1S!p ~q II!A\ ~lII!ll~AO :Z Uop:>~S
"al'B1 A'Bd ~S'Bq
l'BI~aI s,~AOldw~ ~tp s~w!l (Z/1 I) JJ'Bq-~uo pUB ~uo 1'B 10J p~l'BSU~mo:> ~ II!A\ pO!l~d
A'Bp (L) U~A~ 'B U!tp!A\ smoq (017) AllOJ UBtp aIOUI 10 (S~~UBq:> l1Iqs .10J 1d~:>x~) pO!l~d
1noq (17Z) lnOJ-AlU~A\l 'B U!tp!A\ Slnoq (8) 1q~!::l JO SS::l:)X~ U! p::l~OA\ SlnoH : 1 UO!l:>~S
A V d ffii\I1L1I:ffA 0 - AXX :tI'I:> I.LHV
"s~sod:lnd J'BUOSl~ 10J p~sn 10U pUB Ai!:) ~q1 JO AiJ~old ~tp U!BWaI [J'Bqs S[JlU~AO:)
)}lOM q:>ns UV' "1::lq1'B::lA\ ~~~~P-OZ snu!w 10J pooq pUB SU1U~^O:> p~l'Blnsu! OOOZ "I
JtmnUBf aU!UU1S "S!SBq J'BnUUB!q U UO ::l::lAOldW::l q:>U::l10j ~P!^Old II!A\ Ai!:} ~nu :( UO!P~S
.
"lU~UIA'Bd
JO 1d!::l:)~1 'B S)}10,M :>HqIld JO 101:)::l1!a ~q1 01 ~U!P!^Old uodn ~::lAOldW::l ~tp 01 p~Slnqm!~l
~q IHA\ 1U~UIA'Bd "S100q Al~JUs P~Ol-I~::llS JO ::ls'Bq:)lnd ~tp pl'BA\Ol 9661 'I A.mnUBf ~u!l"I1ns
S!S'Bq f'B!UU~!q 'B uo oo'o~r$ 01 dn ~~AOldW::l q:>'B~ 10J ~P!^Old II!A\..u.D ~IU :Z UO!l:>~S
")}::l::lA\ q:>'B~ ::l~AOldW::l ~UI!l-IIry: 'l'BI~aI q~~ 01 SlUBd pU'B
Sll!qS)O ~ll!lS!SUO:> 'SUIlOJ!Un UB~I:) (~) ~^Y ~P!^Old If'Bqs 'HaAO'1d.W3" ~IU :r UO!l:>~S
SWlIOillNIl- AIXX :tI'I:>LLHV
"::lA'B::ll )f:>!S - TIAX ::lP!llV' q1!A\ ::l:)UBplO:):>'B U! ~^'B~I )f:>!S ~sn A'BW
qll!qpUq:> 10 A:>UBU~~ld 01 ~np P~Iq'BS!P Alp'BlodW::l1 S! oqA\ ~~AOIdw~ UV' :S Uop:>~S
.
"SA\'BI ::l1'B1S pUB JlU::lP~J ~Iq'B:>Hddu q1!A\
~:>UUp10:>:>'B U! ::l^'B~I IU1U~d 1~ IJ'Bqs l::lAOldUI3: ::lql - ~^U::ll ~U!lU~d :Z UO!l:)~S
"::llm'B1S Aq 10J P::lp!AOld S'B P~lUU~ ::lq
If'Bqs S::l!l!^!l:>'B fooq:)s S,U::l1PHq:) 10j ::lA'B::ll - S::l!1!A!l:>V' Iooq:>S S,UaIpUq;) :1 UO!l:>::lS
S:tIA V:tI'I - IIIXX :tI'I:>I.LHV
"A'Bd A'BPHoq l'BI~::ll snId JI'Bq ::lUO pUB ::lWPl'B p!Bd ::lq IJ'Bqs
A'BPHoq p::lAl~sqo ::lq1 uo Slno If'B:) pUB ~~'BA\ ::lSBq ::lq1 ::lIqnop 1'B p!Bd ~q IJ'Bqs I A.mnUUf
puu ~Z '17Z l~W~:)~a uo Slno IIU:l 'I A.mnUUf 10 ~Z '17Z l::lqW::l:l~a UUtp l~tpO S! A'BPHoq
p~Al~sqo ~tp u~qA\ sm~A ~upna . A'Bd A'BPHoq l'BIn~aI snld ~~'BA\ ~S'Bq ~tp ~Iqnop 1'B p!Ud
~q IHA\ 'A'BPHoq p~Al::lsqo ~tp ~l'B A~q1 u~qA\ 'I AmnUBf pUB ~Z '17Z l~UI~=>~ UO Slno IJ'B:)
"A'Bd A'BpHoq l'BI~~ snld ~1'B1 ::l~UA\ ::lS'Bq ::lq1 ~Iqnop 1U p!Ud ~q IHA\ A'Ba ~U!A!~S)[UUIU
uo Slno If'B;) "A'Bd A'BP!IOq J'BUIlOU snld JJ'Bq U pUB. ~UI!l 1tl p!Bd ::lq IHA\ 'P~lOU ::lS!A\l::lq10
S'B 1d::l:>x~ 'SA'Bp!IOq p::lAl~sqo 10 SA'BP!IOq uo 1no II'B;) :Slno If'B;) A'BpHOH :~ UOp:>::lS
"A'Bd A'BP!IOq
'B1'Bl-01d ~A!~:>::ll IHA\ S::l::lAOldW::l ~UI!l-J.md 'l'BI~::l~ 'SAUPHOH 'B1'B'H-01d :17 Uop:>~S
t+f[
"~SUodSaI J'BUOSl~ 'B saI!nbaI UO!lUfil!S ~tp u~qA\. l~UUBW pUB pOp~ ~UI!l
~1'B!ldOldd'B U'B U! puodsaI IsnW pUB ~uoqd~Ial Aq ~uodsaI ~l'B!P~UIUI! UB .10J ~Iq'BI!'BAU ~q
ISnW I[u=> uo J'Bnp!A!pU! ~tp 'z UOp=>~S U! P~!J:>S::lp UO!lUSU~WO=> ~A!~=>aI 01 :( uop:>~S
"~UO!l=>~S 'XVd 3Wll'H3AO - AIXX EFOll'HV tp!A\. ~:>U'BpJo=>:>u U! A'Bd AUPHoq
JO n~H U! JJo ~UI!l Al01'Bsu::ldwo=> ~sn 01 1=>::lI::l AUW ~AOldw~ ~41 "A'Bp![Oq ~ A'Bd slnoq
0A\l J'BUO!l!PPU UU p!'Bd ~ IJ'Bqs S)[:>'Bq IJ'B:l A'Bpnoq .101 ~Iq'BI!'BA'B ~ Ol p~!nbaI ::ll'B oqA\.
S::l~AOIdw::l lIV ")[::l~A\. J~ A'Bd JO slnoq (v) ln01 J'Buo!1!Ppu U'B ~A!::l~ Il'Bqs 'HaA0'1dW3 .
~ql Aq p::lU!Ull~l~p SB S)[~q IJ'B=> )[lOA\. 01 p~Inp~q:>s Sl oqA\. ::l~AOldW~ ~1U :Z UOP=>~S
"A'Bd JO ~11U ~q S ,::l~AOldUI~ ~tp S~UI!) (Z/1 1) JJ'Bq
-~uo pUB ~uo 1U Aud ,Slnoq (Z) OMI JO UInUI!u!Ul U .1oJ ~1'BSU~WO=> ~ IHA\. l}Iqs p~Inp~q:>s
J'BWJou S,::l~AOldUI::l ~tp UBtp l~tpO ~wp U 1U )[lOA\. lOJ U! P~IJ'B=> ~~AOldw~ UV :1 uOP=>~S
S)I;)VH'I'IV;) . IIAXX :tI'I:>I.LHV
"SA'BpHoq p~Al~qo pUB SA'BPHOq
01 AIddu 10U S~P 1I "A'Bd ~W!ll::lAO 01 UO!l!PPB ul p!Ud IOU S! Aud wn!UlaId :Z UOP:>~S
"~l'Bl ~suq S .~~AOIdW::l ~tp s~w!l ('VII) JJ'Bq-~uo pUB ~uo JO ~llU ~tp 1'B Pl'Bd ~q
mA\. A'BP tl U! slnoq (8) Iq~!~ l~AO p::l)[lOA\. Slnoq II'B 1d::l:lx::l 'A'Bp )[lOA\. I'BWJou ::lq1 ~P!SlnO .
p::l)[lOA\. lnoq q~::llOJ ~llU ~SBq I'BWJou ~tp ::lAoqU pUB l::lAO OO"Z$ JO wn!waId 'B ~::lAOldUI~
PluS A'Bd 01 S::l~l~'B 'HaAO'ldW3 ::ltp '"w"d 0(:( 01 "W"'B OO:L J'BWJOU ~tp UBtp l~tpO
~Wp U I'B S!S'Bq A:>U~~l~W::l UB uo lJlqs 'B )[lOA\. 01 U! P~IJ'B:l S! ~AOIdw~ U'B U~IIA\ : 1 uOP=>~S
A V d WIlIWmId . IAXX :tIUI.LHV
"::lA!)U1U~S~ld~l
p::ll'B~!S~P
-'HaAO'ldWa ~tp JO I'BAOlddu lopd ::ltp ~AUq lsnw JJo ~wp Al01USU~WO:) "A'Bd ~W!ll~AO
SB ~11U ~UIUS ~tp IU p::lP!AOld ~ II!A\. JJo ~w!l AlOI'BSU~WO:> "A'Bd ~W!ll::lAO JO n~H U!
JJo ~wp AloI'Bsu~dwo:l ~)['Bl A'BW S~~AOIdw::l 'HaAO'ldW3 ~tp JO uo!)do ~ql1V :~ uO!l=>~S
"p::l)}lOA\. Slnoq ~UIUS ~tp lOJ ::l:l!A\.1 p!'Bd lO p::lpunodwo:l 'P~P!UlUlAd ::lq 10U IJ'Bqs
P~)[lOA\. Slnoq ~UIpl::lAO 'uo!l'Bsu~dwo:l ~Wlll::lAO ~u!lndwo:l JO ~sodJnd ~tp lOd :17 UOll:l~S
"P~)[lOA\. ~UI!U~AO P!'Bdun SB P::ll::lplSUO:l
~ Z UO!):l~S l::lpUn s::lsownd plO:l::lllOJ II!A\. S::l::lAOIdw~ Aq p~s11JaI ~Wlll::lAO :( uOP=>~S
ARTICLE~.WAIVER
Section I: Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and
regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent
with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superseded.
Section 2: The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted
in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands
and proposals with respect to any terms or condition of employment not removed by law
from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth
in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of the AGREEMEt'\lT. The
EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet
and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or
covered in this AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment
not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though such terms
and conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or
both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed.
.
ARTICLE XXVIV . DURATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE
This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of the 1st day of January, 2000+998- and shall
remain in full force and effect to and including the 31st day of December, 2001+999
subject to the right on the part of the EMPLOYER or the UNION to open this
AGREEMENT by written notice to the other party, not later than September 1st of the
final year of the AGREEMENT. Failure to give such notice shall cause this
AGREEMENT to be renewed automatically for a period of twelve (12) months from year
to year.
For the City of Shorewood:
For Local 224, Council 14,
American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees
AFL-CIO
.
AGREEMENT entered into this
day of
. 199_.
Woody LoveTol'fi DahlbGlg
Mayor
Jeff Dains Cldis Cowen
Business Representative
James C. Hurrn
City Administrator
Chris Pounder Joseph Ltlgo..~ki
Steward
15+1-
APPENDIX A
1. The following hourly wage rates shall be effective beginJlin~ January 1,
2.Q00:t99&: t:%t
JOB CLASSIFICATION
Light Equipment Operator & Laborer
~ smn Q..mQ 1 Yr 2 Yr ill 4 Yr 5Yr
.1LQQ 14.24 14.76 15.28 15.80 ~ 16.84 .lU2
7.Ji)Q H..QQ J2..U .Li.QQ 16.20 .lQ..ll 17.27 .l.L.aQ
.lLQl l2..QQ ~ lQJQ 12M .11J.2 17.74 J..U2
7/01 .1jAl . 15.97 16.54 17.10 .11.Q2 18.24 l8..l2
. Workin2 Foreman
Date Start 6 mo 1 Yr m 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr
.lLQQ .l2..Q2 lQM 17.20 17.78 llJ1 ~ ~
7.Ji)Q 16.42 17.02 17.62 18.22 18.82 19.42 20.02
1/01 .1M8. 17.49 .1Ul ll.n 19.35 .l2...22 20.58
7/01 17.33 17.97 .l8..QQ .l2.M 19.87 20.51 21.14
II.
The follo'.Tying hotlrl) ..age. rates shall be effective. J1iI} I, 1998.
.
Jon CLAssmCATTON
Light Eqtripment Operator & Lab6rer
St:m Six ~I(')nt:h3 One '[car
$13.02 $13.84 $1-4.64
T."o Year5
ThH:c Y G4r~
$16.28
515.45
',vorking F61 tman.
5tMt
$15.06
Six Month:s One. YC;tf'
$15.89 $16.69
Two YeM;' Th1'cc Y G4r.s
$17.51 518.32
ill. The follo\lVing botlrl} \\age. lMC3 shttH be. G:ffccti.e. J1\ntlMy 1, 1999.('2%)
Jon CL"SSIflCA TION
lQ+9-
C2% )
.
.
G9.S I S;
SIlt"}.. ::Utll
19.9IS;
SI Tl?J).. 1::m.J.1
9ffLl$
n;~JA O\\l
9L. S 1$
SOl'?::> J.. Q ~ .L
HLI
""0.' 1$
.... t-"
~:>'A :>uO
:6.tI$
Jl??].. ')uO
OZ.9I$
Si'qluoJ'\ X!S
:'C.SI$
~
WUliUQ.i ~luPl..JQ N..
II.tI$
Si'tnuoJ'~ X!S
8;:.:::1$
~
.l~.loq~'l ~ lQlgndO lu:;;uudrAb3 lqin
APPE~DIX A
IV, The folIovling netl.I] ..'age Hlfc3 ~halI be cff.::cti'v'c Jtll)" 1, 1999: (2';t.)
Jon CLASSIrTCA TION
Light Eqttipmt..ftt Opoerator & Laborer
Staff
$13,54
Six .Months
$1.!/.A.0
On.:: Y cltr
$ 15.23
Two YeMs
$16,07
Three Yem s
$16,94
'.1forking Foreman
.
Stm't
$15.67
Six Months
$16.53
One YeM
$17,J6
T ,vo YCZlr.~ TIm:c YCMS
$18,:: $19,06
At the sole discretion of the Employer, an employee may be assigned to the job
classification of Working Foreman by the employee's supervisor to perform the
full duties and responsibilities of that classification. In case of such assignment,
the employee shall be paid at a rate of pay which corresponds to the employee's
current step on the Working Foreman's pay schedule.
.
1.
2.
~
3,
4.
5.
6.
7,
Normally. an employee would be hired at Step 1 - 82% of the TOP,
After probation (6 months). an employee would ~o to Step 2 - 85% of the
After 1 year. an employee would ~o to Ste.,p 3 - 88% of the TOP,
After 2 years. an employee would ~o to StfW 4 - 91 % of the TOP.
After 3 years. an emplovee would ~o to Step 5 - 94% of the TOP,
After 4 years. an employee would ~o to Ste.p 6 - 97% of the TOP.
After 5 years. an employee would ~o tot Step 7 - 1 00% of the TOP.
Upon notice to the Union with reasons for doing so, the Employer may hire
qualified new employees at a ~tep other than Step l.ttp to eight} five percent of
the top of the 3mm, schedtllc. The I:mplofGr rmlY grant new cnlpl.oycxs end of
probati.on inCJC~C3 tip to ninc~ five pc~cnt .of the 3m~ schcdtllc. The
employee shall then continue to move through the salary schedule on the annual
anniversary date of their employment. A stfW may be skipped under.
recolll.mendation of the pirector of Public W orks and awroval of the City
Administrator,
ll~
Emplovee Name
Daniel J. Randall
Dennis Johnson
Ralph A. W chIc
Charles S. Davis
Joseph P. Lugowski
Jeffrey Jensen!
Chris Pounder
Brad Mason
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Public Works Department
Seniority List
January,2000t998-
Job Classification
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipmcnt Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Light Equipment Operator
Seniority Date
07-01-73
01-01-74
07-09 84
07-15-85
12-14-87
05-17-94
11-12-96
6-1-98
.
*
Jeff Jensen was ~anted an unpaid leave of absence from October 1. 1999 throu~h
March 31. 2000.
.
.l.2-t=r
"
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed vacation of certain drainage and
utility easements in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was published in the
Excelsior/Shorewood edition of the SUNS AILOR NEWSPAPER on the 17th and 24th days of
November, 1999; and
WHEREAS, said Notice of Public Hearing was posted in three (3) locations in the City
of Shorewood; and
.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Shorewood heard ail interested parties on the
question of vacation at a Public Hearing on the 13th day of December, 1999, in the Council
Chambers at the City Hail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota, that the drainage and utility easements described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, be and hereby are vacated.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is directed to notify the County
Offices in accordance with Minnesota Statutes.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th
. day of December, 1999.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
to.A.
Exhibit A
,
,
~
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF EASEMENTS TO BE V ACA TED
"Those particular drainage and utility easements, originally dedicated on the recorded plat of
MARY LAKE WOODS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated, which are within
Lot 5, Block 1, of said plat;
and
.
That particular 10.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement, originally dedicated on the
recorded plat of MARY LAKE WOODS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and now to be vacated,
which adjoins the southwesterly line of Lot 6. Block 1, of said plat."
.
i..I
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.cLshorewood.mn.us. cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
3 December 1999
RE:
James Bruce Homes - Proposed Division/Combination
FILE NO.
405(99.26)
BACKGROUND
Mr. James Bruce proposes to rearrange the lot line between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 Mary
Lake Woods. The lots are located at 24115 and 24075 Mary Lake Trail (see Site
Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Mr. Bruce proposes to build a new home on the lot
at 24115. The rearrangement is intended to ensure that additional side yard space is
. maintained between it and any new home that may be built on 24075.
The lots in question are zoned R-IA, Single-Family Residential and have an aggregate
area of 2.03 acres, exclusive of the wetland on Lot 6. Upon approval of the
rearrangement (shown on Exhibit B, attached) Lot 5 will have 48,236 square feet of area,
and Lot 6 will have 40,019 square feet, exclusive of wetland.
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
From a zoning perspective this request is quite simple. Both lots will still meet or exceed
the minimum lot area and width requirements of the R-IA zoning district. The placement
of the proposed home on Lot 5 is dictated by the topography of the property, and it is
understandable that the buyer would want some additional space to the east of the house.
There is one issue that must be resolved as part of this application. The original drainage
and utility easements for the lots must be vacated and replaced with new ones along the
n
t.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~ . ,/a
Memorandum
Re: Bruce Division/Combination
3 December 1999
revised lot line. Exhibit C shows that all existing easements on the lots will be vacated
and replaced with new ones. A public hearing has been scheduled for the 13 December
City Council meeting to consider the easement vacation.
It is recommended that the proposed division and combination be approved subject to the
following:
1. The applicant must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion for both
lots for review by the City Attorney.
2. The applicant must provide deeds for the new easements.
3.
The division/combination and the new easements must be recorded within 30 days
of the applicant's receipt of the resolution approving the division/combination and
easement vacation.
.
Cc: Jim Hurm
Larry Brown
Tim Keane
Jim Bruce
.
-2-
~
FROG ISlAND
~
N
o
I
2000 Feet
I
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
NOll VNUIW03/NOISIAIO O~SOdOlId
g IN!qxg:
/'
/
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
llO
Ul-
......
-'"
-it>
~-
,...
~
I"':,~
C~\,
~ " ?.
62.53
NOcr3S'S2"E
'\
"%.\
'\
~ \
\
\ '\
'\
'\
'\
~
'\
..-
.
\
'\
\
'\
.-.
'-'
.
-.,
~
:\"... i
<~ it.,/: "'.> .......
~~~. ..
....,p ...."'.. ~~
.~" ....'"
o ...~
,
1\
J'
J I
," J
-J.. 40..>
1 ~-/f~'.?~
..... ,( L~_~"'.
, ...,. a p
" , 'p~;.a.
.....-~L~ III
t <J"<fl8
_ oil.
~'" <".
1"'"11'"
~OO ~
~. ".
~ 00 ~1'
'6',,,
. ".
r-
~
< ,
'w'
"
)'
\l\
,,"'" .
/ J," 000
...f: '" .rIJ
~~<i'~ or
~o~ ~ :-
.,p' + ::
~ " ~ C E \.. " -;
SOD" 48' 4S" E
~ 33.06
I
9 40"":/
...
,
...,
~"'~
,,~
",;
..:.~."
"';- ""
/",,'
~.""
/V.i
-!' /.~1-~ / ..
.~ <v("
If.'\~?. / -' . ,./
.z;.,,~~~,'
~..- /' (,",
/'
"=-
<<'
,).
<'
""Y
-t..-
()
;GN
.D '"
15,g'1Il
.gt
~ 0
;t.~
!.::
~_..
~.......-
oo~
.... c
"'~iD
>-CD:
;1;1;
.e....
~~
0; 3" :.
0"
III ..
.D !1...
c: ,<,
~ ,....
0 0-
_0
..., ...3
..
!. c:
..
..... :ro
ii"A
0 :r_
0
:r~
.... 2;:
~ c."
0 " .
.e. 2~
.0
C:,<
~ ii'
e>
:g"
0:
;1.e>
"
..
"
'"
III
llO
.lli
VI...
....-
oc;
"'",
~
z
~.
==
.
.
!t;,
"
o
+~
z
-;,
~
)
'("
v>
~
'.::...
.
\
.y..........~..i.9...
~.:'
'"
L
. '\
~
'\ ~
'\
'\
'\ \ ~-
I
'\ ~
.....
'\ "-'
'\ ~ .
--'
'\
\
%; \
'\
,
Exhibit C
EASEMENTS TO BEVACATEDffiEPLACED
RESOLUTION NO.
..
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMBINATION AND RESUBDIVISION
OF REAL PROPERTY FOR JAMES BRUCE HOMES
WHEREAS, James Bruce Homes (Applicant) is the owner of certain real properties
located in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as:
"Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1, Mary Lake Woods"; and
WHEREAS, Applicant has applied for a combination and resubdivision of said
properties to form Parcels A and B, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a
part hereof; and
.
WHEREAS, the combination and resubdivision requested by Applicant complies in all
respects with the Shorewood City Code; and
WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by tIle City Planner, and his recommendations
were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated 3 December 1999,
which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the application and the Planner's memorandum were reviewed by the
Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on 7 December 1999, the minutes of which
meeting are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the application was considered by the City Council at a regular meeting of
the Council held on 13 December 1999, at which time the Planner's Memorandum and the
recommendations of the Planning Commission were reviewed.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That the two parcels of property legally described above be combined and
resubdivided to form Parcels A and B, legally described and shown in Exhibit A.
2. That the City Clerk provide Applicant with a certified copy of this resolution for
recording purposes.
4. That Applicant cause to be recorded this Resolution together with the drainage
and utility easements shown on Exhibit B, with the Hennepin County Recorder or
Registrar of Titles within thirty (30) days of the date of certification.
b. B.
.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of
December 1999.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL A
Lot 5, Btock 1, MARY LAKE WOODS, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Lot 6, of said
Block 1, which lies southwesterly of the following described line:
Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence
North .37 degrees 38 minutes 4.3 seconds West, assuming the
southwesterly line of said Lot 6 bears North 42 degrees 28
minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 300.00 feet and said
line there terminating.
PARCEL 8
Lot 6. Block 1, MARY LAKE WOODS. according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennep'in County. Minnesota. which lies northeasterly of the
following described line:
Beginning at the most southerly comer of said lot 6; thence
North 37 de<]rees 38 minutes 43 seconds West. assuming the
southwesterly line of said Lot 6 bears North 42 degrees 28
minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 300.00 feet and said
line there terminating.
Exhibit A
.
PROPOSED EASEMENTS
A 10.00 foot wide perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under
and across the following described Parcel A:
PARCEL A
Lot 5, Block 1, MARY LAKE WOODS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, and that port of Lot 6, of said Block 1, which lies southwesterly
the following described line:
Beginning at the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence North 37 degrees
38 minutes 43 seconds West. assuming the southwesterly line of said Lot 6
bears North 42 degrees 28 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 300.00 feet
and said line there terminiating.
Said easement adjoins the boundary of said Parcel A.
egether with a 72.00 foot wide perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes
er, under and across said Parcel A. The center line of said easement is described
as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 93.02
feet northwesterly of the southwesterly corner of said Lot 5; thence northeasterly to
a point on the northeasterly line of the above described Parcel A a distance of
46.27 feet northwesterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6 and said center
line there terminating.
Together with a 10.00 foot wide perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes
over, under and across the following described Parcel B:
PARCEL B
. Lot 6, Block 1, MARY LAKE WOODS, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin
. County, Minnesota, which lies northeasterly of the following described line:
Beginning at the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence North 37 degrees
38 minutes 43 seconds West. assuming the southwesterly line of said Lot 6
bear'S North 42 degrees 28 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 300.00 feet
and said line there terminating.
Said easement adjoins the southwesterly line of said Parcel B.
Exhibit B
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2000
FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1981, in compliance
with the Mandatory Land Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan was updated in 1995, the Planning Commission has again
undertaken a complete update of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS; the Comprehensive Plan 2000 was presented on an informal, informational basis to
neighborhood groups and property owners in three open house meetings in the Shorewood City Hall
from 31 August 1999 through 8 September; and
WHEREAS, a special edition of the Shorewood newsletter, with an insert devoted entirely to the
Comprehensive Plan Update was published in August 1999 and sent to all Shorewood residents; and
.
WHEREAS, after legal notice was published in the official City newspaper, the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on 21 September 1999, to present the Comprehensive Plan 2000
to the public; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a separate public hearing on 6 December
1999 to consider the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting on 7 December 1999, recommended that
the City Council adopt the Comprehensive Plan 2000 on an interim basis, pending review and comment
by the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after long and careful study of the Comprehensive Plan 2000.
finds that it is in the City's best interest to approve the Comprehensive Plan 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Shorewood City Council:
.
1. The Comprehensive Plan 2000, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein. is
established as the official development guide of the City of Shorewood on an interim basis pending
review and comment by other governmental agencies as required by law.
2. Upon completion of the governmental agency reviews, the Comprehensive Plan 2000
may be modified as determined necesssary by the City Council and shall be adopted accordingly.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 13th day of December, 1999.
Woody Love, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hunn, City Administrator/Clerk
6. c.,
Housing: - Chapter Outline
.
Introduction................................. ........................... ..... ............................................... H 0-1
Goals and Objectives................................................................. ................................. H 0- 3
Issues................................................. ............................. .............. ................................ H 0- 5
Policies............................ ................. .......... ............................... ................................... H 0- 7
Housing Plan. ...... .................. ............................................................ ........... ............. H 0-11
Housing Condition and Maintenance ............................................................. HO-ll
Variety of Housing Options ........................................................................... HO-12
Senior Housing ........... <.... ...... .......... ...................................... ..... .................... HO-12
Housing Programs ................................................................. ......................... HO-14
Sub-regional Cooperation ..................................................... ......................... HO-14
Chapter Summary. ....................... ....................................................... ............. ..... ... HO-15
.
12-99
Introduction
Shorewood has chosen to develop as a "bedroom
community". The Land Use Plan points out that less than
one percent of the city will be devoted to commercial use in
the future, and industrial uses are not planned at all. As a
predominantly residential community, housing is an
important aspect of the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan.
.
Past planning efforts in Shorewood have focused on
housing quality and maintaining the character of existing
neighborhoods. Residential densities have historically been
kept low to minimize the demand for public utilities and
services. This has also resulted in low traffic volumes
relative to other suburban communities in the metropolitan
area.
Over the past several years attention has been given to the
lack of housing options for an increasing elderly
population. The City's zoning regulations have been
amended to address senior housing and two senior housing
projects have since been approved.
More recently Shorewood has joined with other Lake
Minnetonka cities to address housing issues from a sub-
regional perspective. This Chapter draws heavily from a
report prepared in August, 1998, prepared by the Lake
Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities (LMACC).
.
As in the previous chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, this
chapter first establishes goals and objectives relative to
housing. Housing issues have been identified and policies
formulated. The goals, objectives and policies are directed
at the housing issues in the Housing Plan section of this
Chapter. Background data relative to housing appears in
the Appendix of the Comprehensive Plan.
12-99
HO-l
Housing
Goals and Objectives
.
.
12-99
Housing Goals
Provide safe, healthy and quality housing that
respects the natural environment of the community.
Maintain the present variety of housing options and provide
sufficient housing types, sizes and values to meet the needs
of varying segments of the population.
Maintain and strengthen, where necessary, the character of
individual neighborhoods within the community.
Address local and sub-regional housing issues through
cooperative efforts with neighboring communities through
organizations such as the Lake Minnetonka Area
Cooperating Cities.
Housing Objectives
1. Review local development regulations, and amend
as necessary, to promote a balanced housing supply.
2. Make available to residents and property owners
educational programs on such topics as
renterlIandlord rights, home buying, home
maintenance, etc.
3.
Continue the City's rental housing license program
to maintain current standards for rental housing.
4. Promote private sector maintenance, rehabilitation
and redevelopment of existing properties through
improved communication of available community
services and financial assistance programs.
5. Develop a senior housing program that:
a. Allows seniors to remain in their single-family
homes.
b. Provides a range of housing types, including
step-down housing, senior apartments and
assisted living housing, with initial emphasis
being placed on step-down housing.
HO-3
12-99
c. Establishes regulations that permit the construction of affordable senior housing while
ensuring compatibility with existing residential neighborhoods.
d. Identifies suitable sites for senior housing.
e. Identifies and participates in support services for the elderly, e.g. transportation,
social and recreational facilities, home maintenance and repair.
HO-4
.
.
Housing Issues
Housing Condition and Maintenance
.
The City of Shorewood commissioned a Housing
Condition Inventory in 1996 that concluded that the "vast
majority of the houses surveyed were rated as being in
average condition or better". Nevertheless, the study
indicated that a number of homes in the community
exhibited maintenance problems. While the City offers
rehabilitation assistance in conjunction with Hennepin
County, problem properties are increasingly being
improved through private owner initiative. In 1993 the
City adopted a rental housing code that established an
inspection and maintenance program for the city's rental
housing stock.
Character of Existing Neighborhoods
.
As mentioned in the Land Use Chapter, the
preservation and enhancement of existing
neighborhoods is an important element in
establishing a sense of "community". In the past
the greatest concern expressed by residents was
splitting large properties into small lots. More
recently the concern has shifted to the
redevelopment of older neighborhoods where
modest homes on smaller lots are being replaced by
very large homes that may be out of scale with the
neighborhood. The challenge for the City is to
balance the character of existing neighborhoods
with the desire of residents to improve their
properties.
Variety of Housing Types
Like other Lake Minnetonka communities,
Shorewood has historically been dominated by
single-family residential development. Since the
mid-1980's the City has created areas where a
variety of lot sizes exist. Other than a limited
number of twinhomes and townhouses, the number
of multiple-family residential units in Shorewood is
extremely limited. This concern is somewhat
mitigated by the fact that the south lake area as a
whole exhibits a fairly substantial variety in housing
types. While there may be future opportunities to
12-99
HO-5
broaden the variety of housing types in Shorewood, they are quite limited due to existing
land use patterns and a rapidly diminishing amount of undeveloped land remaining.
Senior Housing
Based upon a Senior Housing Needs Study, prepared in 1991, Shorewood has actively
attempted to encourage the development of senior housing projects in the city over the
past several years. Concerns have been expressed by some area residents that current
regulations relative to senior housing need to be revised to better address the suitability of
various sites for senior housing. It has also been suggested that the 1991 study should be
updated.
Affordable HousinglLivable Communities Participation
Although the City of Shorewood has elected to participate in the Livable Communities
program, numerous factors, most notably high land prices, serve as barriers to the
creation of affordable housing. Minimal job opportunities and lack of transit service
complicate this issue. Shorewood has chosen to focus its efforts on affordable senior
housing.
.
.
12-99
HO-6
Housing Policies
Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Redevelopment
1. Programs for housing structural condition
maintenance shall be pursued to protect the health
and safety of residents and ensure stability of
neighborhoods within the community.
2. The City shall provide information on educational
programs for homeowners to encourage
maintenance and improvement of residential
properties.
.
3.
Maintenance problems and code violations shall be
addressed to improve and strengthen the character
of neighborhoods and avoid spreading the impact of
deterioration.
4. Substandard housing units shall be rehabilitated
whenever possible.
5. Financial assistance for the rehabilitation of
substandard housing units within the community
shall be provided as funding sources and market
conditions permit.
6.
Residential redevelopment of substandard housing
within the community shall be encouraged
whenever compatible with adjacent land uses and
economically feasible.
.
Compatibility
1. Low density residential neighborhoods within the
community shall be protected from encroachment or
intrusion of incompatible higher density residential
land uses, as well as nonresidential use categories,
through adequate buffering and separation.
2. The character of individual residential
neighborhoods shall be respected and maintained.
3. Residential developments shall be protected from
and located away from sources of adverse
environmental impacts including noise, air and
visual pollution.
12-99 HO-7
4. Home occupations, commercial and other nonresidential activities shall be minimized and
are not to be evident within residential neighborhoods.
5. Accessory buildings within the community shall be of a compatible design and size to
maintain a residential character. These buildings shall be limited to residential use related
activities.
6. Outdoor storage is to be minimized and in those instances when it is acceptable, it shall
be conducted in an orderly, confined and limited fashion.
7. Violations of property maintenance standards that infringe upon residential neighborhood
quality, pose public health and safety problems and threaten neighboring property values
shall be aggressively eliminated.
Variety of Housing
1. Shorewood's housing needs, as well as the needs of the overall Lake Minnetonka sub-
region, shall be addressed by providing and maintaining a variety of housing types, styles .
and values.
2. The emergence of a polarizing age distribution within the Lake Minnetonka sub-region is
to be prevented through the provision of diverse housing that reflects life-cycle stages and
economic considerations.
3. A range of property values and rent rates within the Lake Minnetonka sub-regional
housing stock shall be encouraged as a means of diversifying the population and
sustaining individual communities in the area.
4. Adequate living space and fully utilized housing are to be encouraged and promoted
through the provision of a range of choices among housing types and values throughout
the Lake Minnetonka sub-region.
5. Financial assistance programs for first time home buyers shall be utilized, as market .
conditions and funding sources allow, to diversify the population of the Lake Minnetonka
sub-region.
6. The development of housing for special needs populations (e.g., elderly, physically
challenged) within the Lake Minnetonka sub-region shall be supported by financial
assistance programs that may be available as funding sources and market conditions
allow.
New Development
1. New residential development within the Lake Minnetonka sub-region will be guided with
attention to addressing the future needs of the area's population with regard to life-cycle
housing.
12-99 HO-8
2. The development of alternative housing types (e.g., twinhomes, townhouses, multiple-
family) shall be encouraged within the Lake Minnetonka sub-region communities to
supplement single-family homes and diversify the housing options in the area, giving
consideration to local market demands.
3. Housing types and development techniques that conserve land and increase efficiency are
to be encouraged throughout the Lake Minnetonka sub-region.
4. To the degree possible, integration of housing types or styles within a development shall
be allowed when applicable as long as the total number of units conforms to the
prescribed density for the total development.
5. All new housing within the city shall adhere to the highest community design, planning
and construction standards.
.
6.
Design and planning innovations shall be encouraged for the development of housing
units within the community.
7. Innovation in subdivision design and housing development shall be encouraged within
the Lake Minnetonka sub-region through the use of devices such as cluster and planned
unit development concepts.
8. Residential development shall be restricted or prohibited on floodplains, shorelands,
wetlands, and other natural features that perform important protection functions in their
natural state.
.
12-99
HO-9
Housing Plan
Housing Condition and Maintenance
.
The LMACC Sub-Regional Housing Study, prepared in
1998 for the Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities,
suggests the possibility of a uniform housing maintenance
code for the participating communities as a means to
protect the existing housing stock. Shorewood's housing
condition survey suggests that housing maintenance
problems may not be prevalent enough to warrant such
action at this time. Nevertheless, the City may want to
consider some type of passive "truth in housing~' approach
in the future. This type of regulation attempts to identify
certain deficiencies in housing at the time of sale, putting
buyers on notice of problems. The objective is to create an
incentive for property sellers to improve maintenance
conditions prior to the sale.
Often more noticeable than the condition of structures is the
outside maintenance of property. Shorewood has
historically addressed problem sites on a complaint basis.
Although this "neighborhood standard" method has worked
reasonably well, it is recommended that local nuisance
ordinances be reviewed and periodically updated. The
City's spring cleanup event is also viewed as an effective
tool for encouraging residents to maintain their property.
.
In 1993 the City adopted a rental housing code that affected
approximately 100 rental units in the city. This code
establishes standards and a licensing procedure for all types
of rental dwellings. The program has been successful in
that a number of rental units were improved. The City has
received no tenant complaints since the adoption of the
code. Continuation of this effort is recommended.
For many years Shorewood has allocated a portion of its
Community Development Block Grant funds for
rehabilitation of substandard housing. Hennepin County
administers this program. Over the past years the
City has spent $ to provide grants and low
interest loans to people in need of assistance. Not only is it
suggested that the program be continued, it is
recommended that it and other assistance programs be
better publicized through the City newsletter and
information kiosks in the City offices.
12-99
HO-ll
Variety of Housing Options
Shorewood's housing stock consists primarily of large lot, single-family homes. While the
City's development regulations have historically encouraged this type of housing, a very strong
market for larger single-family homes has had an even greater influence on housing in
Shorewood.
The City has attempted to introduce some variety in lot size, housing type and value over the
past twenty years. For example, in the mid 1980' s the Near Mountain development in the
southeast area of the city was approved for a mixture of single-family homes on lots ranging
from one quarter to three quarters of an acre in size. The project also included quadraminiums
and townhouses in the original plan. Citing a very strong market for single-family homes, the
developer ultimately requested that the quads and townhouses be eliminated from the project,
resulting in 70 fewer units by the time it was completed. Similarly, houses in the Covington
Vine Ridge neighborhood were built larger and more expensive than originally suggested by the
developer, this despite quarter acre lot sizes.
Some variety of housing types was achieved in the 1990' s. A number of two-family dwellings .
were built in the Waterford area and on Lawtonka Drive, west of Timber Lane. The Seasons
senior housing project offers low maintenance twinhomes for residents who qualify under
Federal Fair Housing Act guidelines. Shorewood Ponds, currently under construction, provides
"step down" single-family, attached cottages in four-unit buildings as an option to seniors 62
years of age and older.
Although these projects have increased the variety of housing types in Shorewood to some
degree, housing values remain high relative to metropolitan area standards, even though higher
densities have been allowed. As illustrated in the Appendix Chapter, housing values in
Shorewood have risen steadily over the years. Conservatively, the average construction value
(not including the lot) in Shorewood was $272,000 in 1998. To date that average has increased
to $308,000 in 1999. Given the limited amount of land remaining for development in the city,
the relatively high cost of utilities and often soil correction, the high value of land in the Lake
Minnetonka area, and a seemingly insatiable market for upper end housing, this trend is .
anticipated to continue.
Future opportunities for increasing housing variety in Shorewood are viewed as limited.
Consequently, maintenance of the existing mixture of housing will be important. In this regard
the City's policy of keeping house sizes proportionate to lot size should continue to be
implemented. This simply means that smaller lots will accommodate smaller houses.
Even though Shorewood by itself may not be consistent with regional goals relative to housing,
when viewed as part of a larger South Lake Minnetonka community a relatively traditional
model town emerges. Excelsior serves as the downtown core, with multiple-family housing and
small, urban lots. Shorewood, Tonka Bay and Deephaven exist as surrounding suburbs with
larger lots and lower densities.
Senior Housing
In the early 1990' s the City recognized that there was shortage of housing options in
Shorewood for senior citizens that could not, or chose not to, remain in their single-
12-99
HO-12
family homes. A study prepared for the City in 1991 demonstrated that a market exists
for senior housing in the Lake Minnetonka area. In response to an increasing elderly
population, and recognizing the importance of keeping senior citizens in the community,
the City set a goal to promote the development of safe, healthy and affordable housing
options for seniors.
In conjunction with that study Shorewood updated its zoning regulations to address
senior housing. It was determined that the impact of senior housing on streets, parks and
utility services was less than that of other types of residential development.
Consequently, senior housing is now allowed to be built at somewhat higher densities
than otherwise provided by existing zoning. The City also reduced the park dedication
fees and sewer connection charges for senior housing in order to minimize development
costs.
.
The City then actively sought developers of senior housing to build in Shorewood.
Response was limited, however, due to several factors: 1) limited funding resources; 2)
relatively high land costs in the area; 3) unavailability of city water; and 4) conflict with
many residents' desire to retain a low density character throughout the City.
Nevertheless, two senior housing projects, the Seasons and Shorewood Ponds, have
resulted in 24 units and 62 units of senior housing respectively.
In administering the current zoning regulations a number of issues have arisen. For
example, there is some question, given land and development costs, as to the feasibility of
developing senior housing on land zoned for one-acre lots (R-IA zoning district). Also,
the densities allowed in the R-IC district are higher than what is practical to
accommodate the "step-down", single-level housing that seems to be favored by local
seniors. Finally, the site analysis used to identify sites suitable for senior housing is
considerably outdated. Some land previously considered as suitable has since been
developed, and recent utility extensions may suggest new sites that should be examined.
.
While the number of sites remaining may be quite limited, there may still be some
opportunities to provide additional senior housing. In this regard the City should:
. Update its zoning regulations, addressing the issue of reduced densities and
focusing on the most suitable sites
. Update the site analysis study tt;) identify the remaining sites that may be
suitable for senior housing
. Involve neighborhoods early on in the site analysis process
. Review the 1991 Senior Housing Needs Study and consider revisiting the
issue of senior housing using current and Census 2000 information
Many seniors wish to stay in their homes as long as possible. Their ability to do so is
enhanced by services provided within the community. For example, meal programs are
administered through the South Shore Senior Community Center. Transit services such
as Metro Mobility and Dial-a-Ride have been improved in the last couple of years. The
City will continue to work with surrounding communities and various agencies to ensure
that these services remain available to seniors.
12-99
HO-13
Housing Programs
The Sub-Regional Housing Study prepared for the Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating
Cities (LMACC) in August 1998 lists numerous housing programs that are either in use
or available in the Lake Minnetonka area. Descriptions and information on these
programs should be made available through the City offices. The City will serve as a
resource in connecting people interested in these programs with the agencies that
administer them.
Sub-regional Cooperation
Just as Shorewood pools its Community Development Block Grant funds into the Hennepin
County program for housing rehabilitation assistance. the most effective way to address other
housing issues is through cooperative efforts with other Lake Minnetonka communities. In this
regard the City should commit to active participation in the Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating
Cities. Staffing and future funding resources should be allocated to furthering the work of the
LMACC in the following areas:
. Identification and resolution of housing issues within a sub-regional context
. Coordination of efforts to address the supply and demand for housing diversity in the
Lake Minnetonka area
. Expansion of local housing initiatives to a sub-regional level
. Establishment of legal joint powers cooperative agreements to pursue mutual goals in
housing
.
Specific areas where a group effort may be most effective inlcude:
1. Continue to work with the Metropolitan Council Transit Organization (MCTO) to
improve transit in the Lake Minnetonka area
2.
Provide education programs for residents and property owners on renterllandlord rights.
homebuyer education, how-to seminars for home maintenance, etc.
.
3. Coordinate support services available through community religious organizations such as
day care. family mentoring, food shelves, donation programs, etc. with those households
in the LMACC sub-region most in need of assistance.
One of the initiatives suggested in the LMACC Study is the consideration of a sub-regional
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) as a means of creating a coordinated effort in the
implementation of housing plans. Such an entity could also oversee the creation of or
rehabilitation of affordable housing in the Lake Minnetonka area. If housing is to be addressed
on a sub-regional level the idea of one lead agency has merit. It is recommended that this
approach be one of the first studies done by the LMACC.
12-99
HO-14
Chapter Summary
As a predominantly residential community, housing and
issues related to housing are an important aspect of
Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan. Following are the
City's goals relative to housing:
Provide safe, healthy and quality housing that
respects the natural environment of the
community.
Maintain the present variety of housing options and
provide sufficient housing types, sizes and values to
meet the needs of varying segments of the population.
.
Maintain and strengthen, where necessary, the
character of individual neighborhoods within the
community.
Address local and sub-regional housing issues through
cooperative efforts with neighboring communities
through organizations 'such as the Lake Minnetonka
Area Cooperating Cities.
Following are recommendations intended to achieve these
goals:
1.
In the future consider adopting truth in housing
standards to create an incentive for property sellers
to improve maintenance conditions prior to sale.
.
2. Continue to address nuisances on a neighborhood
complaint basis.
3. Continue the City's annual spring cleanup event to
encourage residents to maintain their property.
4. Enforce the City's rental housing licensing program
for all types of rental dwellings.
5. Publicize housing grant and assistance programs
through the City newsletter and information kiosks
in the City offices.
6. Maintain the existing mixture of housing types and
values.
12-99 HO-15
7. Update the City's zoning regulations, addressing the issue of reduced densities and
focusing on the most suitable sites for such housing.
8. Prepare an updated senior housing needs study and site suitability analysis using current
and Census 2000 information.
9. Explore ways to improve transit and other support services that allow seniors to remain in
their single-family homes.
10. Continue to participate with other Lake Minnetonka communities to address housing
issues from a sub-regional perspective.
11. Explore the pros and cons of a sub-regional Housing and Redevelopment Authority as a
means to more effectively implement housing programs.
12-99
HO-16
.
.
~
.-
mI
~
November, 1999
Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce
Serving Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay
Important holiday dates
and deadlines:
November 15th - Deadline for getting exterior holiday
lights on buildings.
November 26th - Early Bird Sale: 7 a.m. - 9 p.m.
.ecember 3rd - Window Decorating Contest for
area businesses.
December 4th - Open House Day with Santa, Rudolph
and Frosty. Plus...popcorn balls for the children; hay
rides for all (Excelsior Mill noon - 2 p.m); community
I holiday pageant (Excelsior Elementary, 4 p.m.); lighting
of the town's Christmas tree (TCF Bank, 5 p.m.); chili
supper (Masonic Hall, 5-7 p.m.).
December 19th - "Lessons and Carols," Trinity
Episcopal Church, 4 p.m. Open to all music lovers.
See the insert in this issue for a listing of many more
community events for the holidays.
Note: there will not be a Holiday Homes Tour in 1999.
e-w;::dh[S~~I"t~li!B~~t:J&~;Gi~~::::::lm~
Library
The Friends of the Excelsior Ubrary are excited to
announce their new fund raising event: "A Festival of
Wreaths." Artists, businesses and creative community
members have donated specialty wreaths which will be on
display and on sale at the Excelsior Ubrary, now through
December 3.
There are a wide variety of "theme wreaths" as well as hol-
iday and seasonal ones, according to Friends Board
President Kathryn Nelson.
The Friends have purchased a wide variety of items for the
library including children's books and programs, shelving
units, Morningstar Mutual Funds services, and browsing
materials. So kick off your holiday season with a stop at
the Excelsior Ubrary, 343 3rd Street. It's for a good cause.
- jawn McKinley
Ixcelsior Area Veterans
Memorial Heeds Funding Help.
Fundraising and planning
for the proposed Excelsior Area War Memorial
are going well, according to Ken Koehnen, local resi-
dent and the project's driver and coordinator. Having
recendy negotiated an agreement with the American
Legion to list on the memorial the names of veterans
who were killed in enemy action, Koehnen now plans
to focus his considerable energies on securing
$9,000.00 needed to build the memorial.
To date, he has collected $1,500.00.
Koehnen hopes the City of Excelsior and Parks and
Recreations councils will approve his first choice for a
memorial site: in Excelsior Commons at the conver-
gence of the sidewalks just west of the Port of
Excelsior... "so people can walk around it and really
see it." If the remaining $7,500 can be committed by
january, Koehnen believes the memorial will be ready
for its debut onjuly 4,2000. A special dedication cer-
emony will be planned in conjunction with the Fourth
of July celebrations at the Commons.
The Excelsior Historical Society helped Koehnen doc-
ument the names, ranks and service branches of 95%
of the war veterans who will be listed.
For more information or to make a donation, contact:
Ken Koehnen, 5200 Meadville Street, Greenwood, MN
55331. 612-474-8705.
:msm2!~sa:aaa-:iU:Emn:: liS ]1 n !Tl1!:! m: Uliun.: .~! mmem:]l:lllnmnusu:u:: :rlJ el a~[ll :::
Member Events
Monday, Dec. 6- Hungry? Thirsty? Go to Maynard's
after 4 p.m. till closing. 50% of all foodlbeverage sales
will be given to Opportunity Partners, a non-profit
organization that helps disabled adults. For more
information call Beth Maloney, Maynards, 470-1800.
* 7A'
,.,
Front side
Date~ 8-31-99
SEe:
Reference:
.Jl~JHVfA!./lJ .ftJtJn./lJ !Pombklll
Desiqn #: Custom
Color: Black
Finish: Pol. 2, Flat Top
This layout is in exact scale size and holds priority over previous information
provided on the original contract or any previous drawings.
. .
Review the layout for accuracy of spelling, dates and appearance.
Mark any desired changes directly on the layout. If everything is correct,
approve the layout and return it to our attention.
DATE:
To help prevent any chance of errors we will not proceed witlr ~ mannradurine
of this memorial without your prior si~ned written approval ",(this sketch.
This drawing Illhe properly 0' R.H.N.gel Dlslr'bulfng. No parllon 0' 11111 wort m., be dllp,.,ed or du,f1C1led wfllloul perml..Ietl.
PLEAS ~N IF O.K.
CAUTI 0 N I Do not approve this sketch until you have
. carefully checked positions and spelling of
names and dates. We cannot "assume responsibilitY for error if
necessary corrections are not made he e rin.. , . ~ ,
-, ct - osq - . 0 I D
CEMETERY SALESMAN
Chris\Ta lor
As s~(etched
O~& S ~
60,409 . MN ~ OFF
i
.
y". \ ~ ;,
.~ ' ~
~
~ BOX 733 - ST. CLOUD. MINN 56302
PHONES: AREA CODE 320 251-8010
FAX 320 251-8019
r
MR KEN KOEHNEN
5200 MEADVILLE STREET
GREENWOOD MN 55331
'L
t~ J.:)
~ ,'~' ,-.'\
".' J i
.......)-
DEUVERY
Summer
ROUTE
ORDER NO. 60,409
DATj
une 2, 1999
MATERIAL
Mahogany
.1-
Memorial per sketch
Polished 2; Balance rustic; Carved & lettered front.
Rustic Oval top
';.;'
\.,...,
"
.
WORLD WAR I
.: '., I GRANT LORENZ !
.. .. ~l kORFAII=~ 1953~;
i VIETNAH 1961 - 1975
. ~;-.","r~"-~G;' ;;;;~SON
. 1_ . - ..1,' ,'.~,:_,:, "~'-..~',
, ,. ~~ '\ .. .. . .. -. -- OJ f .. -.. -.- . ___~ _ ~
j ~ <l........4~ ~_T:.).;O:" '."
~: ...~ ~ ," :. :; '"\" i' .~.~; -~-
, 1941 - 1945
DONALD BENGSON
ALFRED BOT'1'KE
DONALD EDEN
THEODORE GLUECK
CHAR HUNTINGTON
PAUL JOHNSON
DARYL LUEDKE
RUSS MARBO
WILLIAM OLSON
FRANK QUADY
ROY SHUCK
BRUCE STANGHOR
JAMES STUDER
EDWIN TUMA
~
,
, .,'
:~. (.
;~
~t. _ . I
\>
. .
~
,
:', I
,
. '
i ~.
!~',t.lv,,;
........' ;
,I
Size: 5-0 x 0-6 x 3-6
L1:._ ..:ERS ; Route
Title: FROSTED INLAID in polish. Balance: Sandsunk in frosted panels. .
I certify that I have carefully checked position and spelUng of above names; also dates. and guarantee them to be
correct. My signature hereby confirms my order according to the above specifications.
Signed
.to SIGN AND RETURN IMMEDIATELY.
EXCELSIOR AREA MEN KILLED IN ACTION WHILE FIGHTING IN OUR GREAT WARS
..
.
GRANT LORENZ
GUY R. FOBBES
J.JAY VIETZ
BLANCHARD WEST
JOHN W. CRABTREE
MERVIN GROVER
ROGER KENNEDY
WORLD WAR * 1
151 st Field Artillery
Lieut.
ALFRED BOTI'KE
JAMES A. STUDER
WORLD WAR * 2
Pfc U S Marines
Pilot Officer
Canadian Air Force
EDWIN TUMA Lieut. U S Navy
OMER E. HUNTINGTON Lieut. U S Army Air Force
DARYL LUEDTKE Pfc U S Marines
DONALD BENGSON Ensign U S Navy
PAUL B. JOHNSEN Pfc U S Anny
ROY D. SCHUCK Lieut. U S Navy
BRUCE C. - STANGOHR Lieut. U S Anny Air Force
vITLLIAM R. OLSON Private U S Army
RUSSELL F. MARBOE Sergeant U S Marines
DONALD M. EDEN U S Anny
FRANK QUADY U S Navy
LYLE E. HOLLISTER Rd 2/c U S Navy
RICHARD J. HOLLISTER U S Navy
WILLIAM H. HOLLISTER U S Navy
HERBERT L. SCHMIDT
KOREAN WAR
U S Air Force
BERNARD A. TESKE
VIET NAM
Corporal U S Marines
ROGER M; KITI'ELSON Corporal U S Marines
THOMAS A. KNOPIK Warrent Officer
U S Army
DIed August 8, 1918 at Chateau Thierry, Fr
Died ~y 5, 1918 in France
Died in France
Died in France
Died in France October 1918
Died in France July 26, 1918
Killed in action July 26, 1918
Killed Nov. 24 1942 on Guadalcanal
Shot down over Germany - early part of
1943 - Buried in a English Cernetary in Ger
Killed in action May 1944 on patrol missic
Reported missing July 1943 in::.the~:China,
Burma, India
Killed on Tarawa Dee. 1943
.
June 1943 his dive bomber was shot down an
he was killed
Killed in Burma - India june 13 1943
Reported missing April 1944 on flight at s
Killed in action over Brinswick, Germany
September 28, 1944
Killed near Khartoum in Feb. 1945
Killed March 1, 1945 on Iwo Jima
Killed June 5, 1945 on Okinawa
Killed on the bridge of Air Craft Carrier
by a Japanese suicide bomber ~
Missing January 24, 1944 on the USS pJBe"
after a bombing attack
(Twin Brothers serving on the USS Liscorne
Bay - November 24, 1943 enemy sunk the shi r
William died of wounds - Richard missing in
action
Killed March 24, 1955
Killed in Viet N~ May 1966
Killed in Viet Nam Feb. 25, 1969
Killed in Viet Nam Nov. 18, 1970
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2000 BUDGET AND APPROVING
THE 1999 PROPERTY TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2000
WHEREAS, the 2000 Budget and 1999 property tax levies collectible in 2000 for the City of
Shorewood were submitted and made available for public review at City Hall on November 30, 1999; and,
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing, upon notice duly given, was held on December 6, 1999, for the
purpose of receiving comments from the public regarding the adoption of such budgets and property tax
levies; and,
WHEREAS, the adoption of the 2000 Budgets and 1999 property tax levy collectible in 2000 was
held over to a subsequent hearing held on December 13, 1999.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
1. That the following budgets are adopted for the year 2000:
General Fund
Water Fund - Operating and Debt Service
Sewer Fund
Recycling Fund
Stormwater Management Fund
$2,907,240.00
992,381.00
826,069.00
86,436.00
159,737.00
2. That the following sums be levied for 1999, collectible in 2000, upon taxable
property in the City of Shorewood for the following purposes:
.
General Fund
Special Levy -
1998 Storm Damage
Less: HACA
Total Levy
$2,341,009.00
22,668.00
(426.898.00)
$1.936.779.00
3. That the City A4ministrator/Clerk i~ hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of December,
1999.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1t7B
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD'S WAGE AND SALARY
RANGE CHART FOR 2000 AND SETTING THE MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION
TOWARD THE MONTHLY INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City Council established the current salary and wage range chart and the current
monthly contribution toward the monthly insurance premium for City emplqyees by its respective
Resolutions No. 98-111 and No. 98-117; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to, from time to time, revise such salary and
wage range chart and monthly contibution towards monthly insurance premiums for City employees
within the parameters of State Statutes.
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The City of Shorewood's Salary and Wage Range Chart is hereby revised for the year 2000 as
listed on Exhibit A, attached to and hereby made a part of this resolution.
2. The City's contribution toward the monthly insurance premiums for City non-contract
employees is hereby set at $447.00 per month for the year 2000.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective January 1,2000.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shore wood this 13th day of December, 1999.
.
ATTEST:
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
it7C I
I
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PAY PLAN /PAY RANGES
1/1/2000
Stability Pay
3% Ste s 1.5% Ste s
Comp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Position Worth Pt. Start 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year. 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years
Administrator 1062 55,942 57,672 59,456 61,295 63,191 65,145 67,160 68,167 69,190 70,228
Engineer/PW Director 1030 54,376 56,058 57,792 59,579 61,422 63,322 65,280 66,259 67,253 68,262
Finance Director 1025 54,037 55,708 57.431 59,207 61,038 62,926 64,872 65,845 66,833 67,835
Planning Director 923 50,638 52,204 53,819 55,483 57,199 58,968 60,792 61,704 62,629 63,569
Supervisor 0 & M 894 40,386 41,635 42,922 44,250 45,618 47,029 48.484 49,211 49,949 50,698
Liquor Ops Mgr 876 39,933 41,168 42.441 43,754 45,107 46,502 47,940 48,659 49,389 50,130
Building Official 815 39,678 40,905 42,170 43.474 44,819 46,205 47.634 48,349 49,074 49,810
Exe See/Deputy Clerk 780 39,083 40,292 41,538 42,823 44,147 45,512 46,920 47,624 48,338 49,063
Planning Asst 704 35,005 36,087 37,204 38,354 39,540 40,763 42,024 42,654 43,294 43,944
Sr Acct Clerk 569 31,351 32,321 33,321 34,351 35.414 36,509 37,638 38,203 38,776 39,357
Rec/Web Dev 517 27,613 28,467 29,347 30,255 31,191 32,156 33,150 33,647 34,152 34,664
Communications Tech 501 26,526 27,347 28,193 29,064 29,963 30,890 31,845 32,323 32,808 33,300
Secretary 497 25.489 26,277 27,090 27,928 28,792 29,682 30,600 31,059 31,525 31,998
Clerical 435 21,719 22,391 23,083 23,797 24,533 25,292 26,074 26.465 26,862 27,265
PAY PLAN /PAY RANGES
7/1/2000
Stability Pay
3% Ste s 1.5% Ste s
Comp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Position Worth pts Start 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years
Administrator 1062 57,061 58,826 60,645 62,521 64.455 66.448 68,503 69,531 70,574 71,632
Engineer/PW Director 1030 55.464 57,179 58,948 60,771 62,650 64,588 66,586 67,584 68,598 69,627
Finance Director 1025 55,117 56,822 58,579 60,391 .62,259 64,184 66,169 67,162 68,169 69,192
Planning Director 923 51,651 53,248 54,895 56,593 58,343 60,148 62,008 62,938 63,882 64,840
Supervisor 0 & M 894 41,193 42.467 43,781 45,135 46,531 47,970 49.453 50,195 50,948 51,712
Liquor Ops Mgr 876 40,731 41,991 43,290 44,629 46,009 47.432 48,899 49,632 50,377 51,132
Building Official 815 40.471 41,723 43,013 44,344 45,715 47,129 48,587 49,315 50,055 50,806
Exe See/Deputy Clerk 780 39,865 41,098 42,369 43,679 45,030 46.423 47,858 48,576 49,305 50,044
Planning Asat 704 35,705 36,809 37,948 39,121 40,331 41,579 42,864 43,507 44,160 44,822
Sr Acct Clerk 569 31,978 32,967 33,987 35,038 36,122 37,239 38,391 38,967 39,551 40,144
Rec/Web Dev 517 28,165 29,036 29,934 30,860 31,815 32,799 33,813 34,320 34,835 35,358
Communications Tech 501 27,057 27,894 28,756 29,646 30,563 31,508 32,482 32,970 33.464 33,966
Secretary 497 25,999 26,803 27,632 28.486 29,367 30,276 31,212 31,680 32,155 32,638
Clerical 435 22,154 ,,839 23,545 24,273 25,024 . 25,798 26,596 26,995 27.400 27,811
ORDINANCE NO. 357
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1301.02 OF
THE CITY CODE, SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
AND WATER SERVICE CHARGES
Section 1. Section 1301.02, Schedule A of the Shorewood City Code is amended as follows:
Type of Chare:es/Fee
City Code
Reference
Chare:e/Fee
Sanitary Sewer Service
904.l5.la
$60.00/qtr/residential
$40.00/qtr/residential
low income
$30.00/qtr/residential
Seasonal
.
Water Service
903.09.1a
$71.90/qtr, plus $2.55
ea 1,000 gallons in
excess of 28,500
gallons per qtrl Commercial
23.25/qtr 1st 10,000 gallons, plus
$1.50/1,000 gallons in excess of
10,000 gallons up to 50,000
gallons, and $1.75 per 1,000
gallons in excess of 50,000
gallons per quarter
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1,2000 upon its passage and
.ublication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shore wood, Minnesota, this 13th day of
December, 1999.
WOODY LOVE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
tt7/J
tlio
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
CATHERINE M. ELKE
6185 County Road 8 Southwest · Waverly, MN 55390
H 612-658-4709 · W 612-512-7441 ext. 230
SUMMARY
Accounting professional recognized for dependability, organizational skills, high productivity, ability to learn
quickly and accept challenges. Experienced in accounts payable, accounts receivable, cash application, and
account reconciliation. Strong numerical aptitude with accurate lO-key and data eutry skills. Excellent
interpersonal skills with ability to develop effective peer and vendor relationships. Comfortable working
independently and as a team member.
Software
Windows, Microsoft Excel, Word, Lotus, Quicken, Manage 2000 System, Platinum, Open
Systems Accounting Software and First Data System.
Liberal Arts Coursework, North Hennepin Community College, Brooklyn Park, MN, 1990-1999
Education
EMPLOYMENT
NORTH STAR TITLE, INC., Excelsior, MN
Jr. Accountant
1998-present
Prepared daily, weekly, and monthly order count analysis reports
Created various month-end reports, including customer agings, order counts and cancellations by division for
distribution to managers and use in the monthly financial package.
Providecl backup for the trust accountant, processing incoming and outgoing wires! ACH transfers, maintaining
the wire log, balancing the daily wire activity and processing stop payments.
Balanced.and replenished the petty cash fund monthly.
Researched and resolved customer statement problems.
Produced daily customer invoicing for appraisal charges.
Assisted the cash receipts clerk in posting and balancing daily cash receipts and end-of -day cash reports.
Audited bi-monthly sales commission reports.
Processed accounts payable in the absence of the AP clerk, including coding invoices, requesting W-9's,
routing invoices for approvals, and printing checks.
Maintained staffvacation and sick time schedules.
Reviewed employee timesheets.
Reconciled various general ledger accounts, including bank accounts, expense accounts, suspense and
receivables, making the necessary correcting journal entries.
1I1S
.
"ltrnlII:)jmmm JO] S,r,)m()lSll:) O,-~I dolJo SlQtllS iuplB i1J!Z!SmJdlII:) SlJodro: s~ qsro AIJPaM prollpOld .
'~UBfl!Q ~ pue 'Slu~ 'S~!OAlT! 'SlUfiOO:)B i~::u ~!J!llblT! ~()lSl1:) p::u~A\.SllV .
'J~UDm M~IJ~ pm reuo!~JoJd U! SlU~1lll!WWoo ~~ pue lU~mAOO
JOJ ~:mIp i1I!lPS ~molSro lp!M. :x>mmp:u::u l1I~mABd ~Bpoi~N .SJ~molSfi:) OJ snn:> uO~Iloo ~d .
"SlSOO UO~ ~ JPIUl OJ uop:mpwd iunqtm~ s~Aoldm~ 08 JO] sp.m:> JOQBI ArM' p::u~u3: .
oSl!Socbp JfUBCl ~ .Sld!~ qstr.> AHIJI> ~m{tlq pm P~sod .
's~P!IocIl1I~m~qtlI!::u
AmdmOO OJ ~mndmoo JOJ UOPBl1I:mJroOp ~1~ ~msu:) 01 SlJocI::u ~00x:) ~AoldW:) ~M~!A:)lI .
o~ptmdacs!p AJpu::JP!
OJ J~:und ptm Jopu~ u~ i~U! AI~~ Aq SJOJJ:) ~!OAU! Jop~ ~los::u pm ~q:>.re:)S~lI .
o~OOx~ ~~tuUl! JOJ ~ U:)qM ~q:) JBntmU ~ld om~lSAs ~lqtMOO SlUfiOO:)B ~muOJng
ilf!Sn ~1f.) 001 -()9 i1J!llSS! ptm SUlU '{:):)lp AIJPaM i1I!J8d::ud 'S~!OAlT! JopU:)A ~!pnB pm ~q:)lBW .
L661-t661
1S1lDpadS fJupuno:J:W
NW '3!-1!W.Id U3P:I ";)NI 'X:lN1lJWO;)~:IN Nt)
.
"){~M JOO At:lp ~uo lS!UO~ JOJ J~!I::U q:)UfiI P::JP!Aold .
'SlUfi~ m1p lSOO JO ,{rnumms
pm '~OJJB ~!Jd 's:nmoosg> ~!Jd '~J1lS l:)U iU!pnl:)U! 's{Bpmuy JOJ SlJod::u pU~lpuom sno!JM ~l~J;) .
'Sld!~l qsro AHIJp ~m{tlq pUB ~lSod .
',,\:)U~iB UO~IlO:) 01 ~A01U11l JOJ Sluno~ :)np lSOO AI::U~A:)S ~OO~ .
oSlUfiOO:)B J~mOlSro 1uoobu!I::JP 1ll!M. dn-MOIlOJ uO~Iloo ~0J.l~ .
oSl!1U!I l~ iU9l~ pm 'SUIJ:)l i~ 's~u:)~J::u iUPf-Xlq:) 'suopronddB 1~ J~molSfi:) M~U ~BnIM3: .
's~!J!11bu! ~uoqd J:)m()lSl1:) P:U~A\.SllV .
's:)l!J ~!OAU! J~mOlSfi:) ~ol:) pm uOOo ~lT!mU!BW .
oAPJ~ AI01trnAU! ~fpB pm 'SUJlll:)ll:)m()lSl1:) JOJ som~m 1!P:ll:) ~~ld .
opmmof ilT!lSocI ~!0AU! A(!IJp ~IPuo:):)lI .
.m~As ~
-X!lIil B pm ~ iUP!OAU! :>!U~~ m lpoq SlT!ZfiPn 's~!oAu! l~molSro lJodx:) pm :)~mop DB ~:)npo.ld .
8661
1S!ll1padS ;JJq1Jd.!a:JaN splno:J:J.",
NW 'mfuOP1I1l!J\I '.;).N:J SnaLSnO.N:J O;)H:IW
, :)iBd
:!DI~]: .W :!INIHm.L V:J
...
,.
lIt-
.,.,;
,,~\,'
#.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CATHERINE M. ELKE
Page 3
GAGE MARKETING GROUP INC., Plymouth, MN
Accountant, 1991-1994
Accounting Coordinator, 1989-1991
Accounting Clerk, 1987-1989
Reconciliation Clerk, 1985-1987
Distribution Clerk, 1984-1985
1984-1994
Maintained several bank accounts utilizing on-line bank system and Quicken researching variances and
making necessary acljustingjournal entries,
Prepared. and entered. month-end general ledger journal entries on Platinmn accounting system meeting
closing deadlines consistently.
Produced 12 monthly product line sales and cost of sales analysis reports and distributed to upper
management.
Reconciled accounts receivable, working with credit and billing departments to resolve problems.
Balanced postage meters and accounts for four plant locations, making necessary revisions in procedures to
streamline processes and eliminate loss of recorded expenses.
Compiled plant standard reports for four plants enabling managers to evaluate efficiency.
Calculated salary transfer entries between departments to accurately track department productivity.
Verified physical inventory counts annually, pinpointing raw material locations and usages.
Assisted in annual budget preparation, including keying information and collating reports for distribution.
Completed weekly sales reports that provided overviews of product line profitability.
Utilized weekly sales reports to prepare monthly sales forecast displaying next month sales projections.
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
James C. Hurm
City Administrator
f~
H
;iij
J
Date: December 8, 1999
Re: Restructuring of the front office
.
As the Council is aware Patti Helgesen, Planning Assistant has indicated she will be
leaving the city around the first of the year. Planning Director, Brad Nielsen has talked
with me and Pamela Helling about Pamela moving from the receptionist position to the
planning assistant position. Pamela will keep the duties of web page maintenance and
development. This is acceptable to all parties. Further, I have talked with Twila Grout,
Secretary of Parks and Public Works about moving to the receptionist position. She has
indicated willingness to do so. She will keep the duties of the park secretary.
.
The remaining question then is what to do with Twila's position. I talked with Director of
Public Works, Larry Brown several times about how to better meet his needs. We feel
that he has need for more technical assistance. He will be drafting a job description for a
technical assistant and is communicating with cities with such a position at this time.
We hope to be able to bring a job description and further details to the council by
January. The position would be funded from the sewer and water utility funds as well as
the general fund.
That leaves us with a need for relief and assistance for the receptionist/secretary . We are
proposing that a 20-hour a week position be created as a part-time receptionist/secretary.
The funding for this position would come from the amount that had been budgeted for
Twila's full-time position for the year 2000. The funds left over could go toward the
technical assistant position.
The request is for a motion authorizing the creation of a part-time receptionist/secretary
position and authorizing advertisement for it.
1F1f
(
l
,'"
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Position: ReceptionistJPark Secretary
Objective and Scope:
To perform secretarial, clerical and general front-desk duties. To receive telephone calls
and visitors in a pleasant and business like manner and to refer items which this position
is not responsible for to the proper City personnel.
Relationship
Reports to: Executive Secretary/Deputy Clerk
Specific Responsibilities
.
A.
General Office and Receptionist:
1. Answers incoming telephone calls and in-person inquires in a diplomatic
and helpful manner, providing accurate information, referring callers to
appropriate individuals, and recording accurate information in their
absence.
2. Collects incoming funds, prepares receipts and daily deposit, and balances
petty cash.
3. Processes and delivers incoming mail, voice mail and E-mail messages on
a daily basis, maintaining a log of requests.
4.
Coordinates the preparation, production and maintenance of the City
communication tools, including but not limited to: voice mail system,
bulletin board, customer service evaluation forms, Shorewood profile,
Friendly User Guide, Internet HomePage, and the Tonka Report.
.
5. Ensures that supplies are available, information is organized and
accessible, work requests are processed quickly, and deadlines are met.
6. Responsible for scheduling building inspections.
7. Assists with the acceptance and/or issuance of various applications,
licenses and permits, including but not limited to: homestead applications;
voter registration; dog licenses; burning; party; and plumbing, mechanical
and building permits.
8. Responsible for light maintenance of general office areas.
1:F7G
SecretarylReceptionist
Page 2
"f'
I
~
9. Provides secretarial and general clerical assistance.
10. Organize bulk mailings (Le. newsletter).
11. Performs other duties and assumes responsibilities as assigned.
B. Elections:
Assists in the administration of all elections including but not limited to:
answering inquires, issuance of absentee ballots, and maintenance of files.
C. Parks:
1. Prepares and distributes Park Commission and Park Foundation agendas
and packets.
2.
Attends Park Commission meetings when necessary to record meeting and
draft minutes. Provides secretarial support and meeting follow-up.
.
3. Acts as staff liaison to the Park Commission, providing staff support and
meeting follow-up for the City Administrator and Public Works Director.
4. Maintains all records and files on park information, park projects and
proposals, and maintains park related policies and procedures.
5. Coordinates the skating rink program, including but not limited to training,
scheduling, and supervising personnel and rink usage.
6. Coordinates, with the help of Minnetonka Community Educational
Services, the use of all fields within the City for athletic events.
7.
Coordinates snowmobile season activities, prepares newsletter articles,
trail walks and gathers necessary data for end of the season report.
.
Minimum Requirements.
1. Education - High School diploma. Additional training in secretarial,
computer or receptionist skills desired.
2. One to three years of experience after high school, to acquire work
planning and office practice skills.
3. Knowledge of correct English usage, including grammar and spelling;
visual proofreading skills. Can type with speed and accuracy and learn to
use any required equipment.
r
.-
.
.
SecretarylReceptionist
Page 3
4. Ability to compose routine answers to correspondence and inquiries.
5. Ability to use the computer efficiently for word processing, spreadsheet
computations, data base management and other assigned applications.
6. Ability to work effectively with others, by offering to help, responding to
questions willingly, and looking for ways to improve cooperative efforts.
7. Ability to learn and remember facts about the department activities and
staff; ability to plan ahead, accounting for interruptions and other
unanticipated events.
8. Ability to exercise tact and discretion.
9. Ability to prioritize work effort so that level of supplies is monitored and
work in progress is accomplished promptly and on time.
10.
Must have outstanding grooming and deportment.
Work Environment:
1. The work environment is that of a typical office.
2. The noise level in the work environment is moderately noisy on an
occasional basis.
3. Office equipment typically operated includes telecommunications systems,
computers, dictating machines, calculators, typewriters, and collators.
The work environment characteristics described above are representative of those an
employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
,
."
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Position: SecretarylReceptionist - Part Time
Objective and Scooe:
To perform secretarial, clerical and general front-desk duties. To receive telephone calls and visitors in a
pleasant and business like manner and to refer items which this position is not responsible for to the proper
City personnel.
Relationshio
Reports to:
Executive SecretarylDeputy Clerk
Soecific Resoonsibilities
General Office and Receptionist:
A.
I.
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.
Answers incoming telephone calls and in-person inquires in a diplomatic and helpful
manner, providing accurate information, referring callers to appropriate individuals, and
recording accurate information in their absence.
Collects incoming funds, prepares receipts. Prepares daily deposit when necessary.
Processes and delivers incoming mail, voice mail and E-mail messages on a daily basis,
maintaining a log of requests.
Responsible for scheduling building inspections.
Assists with the acceptance and/or issuance of various applications, licenses and permits,
including but not limited to: homestead applications; voter registration; dog licenses;
burning; party; and plumbing, mechanical and building permits.
6. Provides secretarial and general clerical assistance.
7. Assist in organizing bulk mailings (i.e. newsletter).
8.
Initiates contact with other organizations or agencies as directed, to collect, research, or
disseminate information.
9. Informs supervisor of the status of work assignments and coordinates work tasks with
coworkers as appropriate.
10. Prepares and distributes meeting packets. Responsible for preparing the facilities for
scheduled meetings.
11. Performs other duties and assumes responsibilities as assigned.
B. Elections:
Assists in the administration of all elections including but not limited to: answering
inquires, issuance of absentee ballots, and maintenance of files.
Minimum Reauirements.
~,
'\
SecretarylReceptionist
Page 2
1. Education - High School diploma. Additional training in secretarial, computer or
receptionist skills desired.
2. One to three years of experience after high school, to acquire work planning and office
practice skills.
3. Knowledge of correct English usage, including grammar and spelling; visual proofreading
skills. Can type with speed and accuracy and learn to use any required equipment.
4. Ability to compose routine answers to correspondence and inquiries.
5. Ability to use the computer efficiently for word processing, spreadsheet computations,
data base management and other assigned applications.
6. Ability to work effectively with others, by offering to help, responding to questions
willingly, and looking for ways to improve cooperative efforts.
7.
Ability to learn and remember facts about the department activities and staff; ability to
plan ahead, accounting for interruptions and other unanticipated events.
.
8. Ability to exercise tact and discretion.
9. Ability to prioritize work effort so that level of supplies is monitored and work in
progress is accomplished promptly and on time.
10. Must have outstanding grooming and deportment.
Work Environment:
1. The work environment is that of a typical office.
2. The noise level in the work environment is moderately noisy on an
occasional basis.
3.
Office equipment typically operated includes telecommunications systems,
computers, dictating machines, calculators, typewriters, and collators.
.
The work environment characteristics described above are representative of those an
employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
To:
Mayor and City Council
~
From:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
Date: December 10, 1999
Re: Preliminary Grant Applications to the Minnesota Board of Government
Innovation and Cooperation
.
Enclosed for your review are three preliminary grant applications and a summary of
requirements. They need to be delivered to the Board by Friday, December 17. I will be
working on improving the pre-application narratives between now and December 15. I
ask that the City Council review them and let me know if in fact they should be
submitted.
1. This application is for funding for the Gideon Glen stormwater management
project. This project has been included in Shorewood's Capital Improvement
Program for many years. This application dovetails with the application recently
submitted to the Metropolitan Council for another grant program.
.
2. The South Lake Minnetonka Vision For a New Millenium- The idea for this
project came from a leadership meeting sponsored by the Excelsior Area Chamber
of Commerce attended by Woody Love and representatives from other cities and
civic organizations. Representative Barb Sykora encouraged us to submit an
application.
3. Excelsior/South Lake Minnetonka Joint Fire and Rescue Service Start-Up--If the
five cities accomplish the establishment of a Joint Powers Board in early 2000,
clearly some financial assistance will be needed for a facilities and equipment
study, for general consulting services, and for recruitment for a full-time
Chief/Administrator. This application requests financial assistance for those
items.
4. I have been asked by the lake area administrators to consider drafting a grant
preliminary application for a Lake Minnetonka Area Housing Market Study. This
request came just last week so I have not had an opportunity to draft pre-
application yet. The intent would be to go beyond the housing study that was
'Aii
Page 2
accomplished last year. It would include a needs analysis of housing in the whole
lake area. I would like direction, if I am able to pull the pre-application together,
if the City Council should have any objection to its submittal.
Each of these pre-applications have been drafted to meet the requirements established by
the Board for their grant application process. That is why the material is enclosed on the
objectives of the various grant types. Any suggestions on improving the narrative and
direction from council members is appreciated.
.
.
Overview - What Type Of Projects Is The Board Seeking
The competitive grant programs offered by the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation fund pilot
projects to improve the effectiveness or efficiency of public services. Based on the statutory scoring criteria,
certain project characteristics are likely to increase the overall score of a project. A project that includes
all of these characteristics has the best chance of being ftmded. The Board is seeking projects that:
.
.
.
.
.
.
are based on highly innovative ideas that have not previously been implemented in Minnesota;
will require cooperation and collaboration between two or more local units of government;!
will improve the quality, effectiveness or efficiency of an existing public service;
will develop an improved service benefiting other local governments, and will provide a product
(useful data, a blueprint or quantified savings) that will be of value for other local officials
andlor state agency staff;
provides a clear rationale for why this project should be fimded by the state, as opposed to using
local revenues to fund it (i.e. win there be a statewide benefit if this project is successful?); and
includes a budget that demonstrates a strong financial or in-kind commitment by the applicant
and clearly states why state financial assistance is needed for the project to move forward.
.
.
The list of projects previously fimded by the Board (see page 29) may help you understand the type of
projects that are likely to be funded. However, local officials should avoid proposing identical projects.
If a project has previously been funded by the Board, the Board may be less likely to ftmd an identical
proposal unless an applicant can explain how its project will differ from the original project.
Collaboration With A State Agency Is Encouraged
The Board encourages local governplents to collaborate with state agencies in the development of their
projects. The primary goals of the Board's competitive grants are to fund pilot projects that: 1) will benefit
other local governments throughout the state, and 2) are consistent with statewide efforts to improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of public services. Given these goals, state agencies offer a unique perspective
on how a local project could be developed in a manner that will maximize its benefit for other jurisdictions.
The Board encourages local governments to include a state agency as a partner in its collaborative. If a
state agency is a partner to an application, the applicant may want to include a letter from the agency
head explaining why he or she believes this project will have a positive statewide benefit.
While collaborations with state agencies are encouraged, the Board recognizes that there are potential local
government innovations that may not warrant state agency participation. By encouraging collaboration with
state agencies, the Board is not requiring that a state agency be.a partner for a project to be eligible for
funding. Furthermore, a local unit of government must be the lead applicant for all projects.
Projects that qualify for other state grant programs are discouraged
The Legislature has authorized numerous categorical grant programs for a variety of public purposes. While
Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation funds may be used for projects that also qualify for a
state categorical grant program, the applicant must make a compelling case in the project narrative stating
why the categorical grant program will not provide sufficient fimding to meet the needs of the proposal.
! A "local unit of government" is defined as a county, city, school district, town, special taxing
district or an association of local governments.
2
MINNESOTA
BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOvATION AND COOPERATION
"". ..Notice of Grant Availability
,-.. ..,..- :;..,.
. ..
The Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation announces the availability of
grants for local units of governments and affiliated organizations. Up to 5750,000 is available for
three grant categories for the first grant cycle (July 1, 1999 - May 26, 2000). A second grant
cycle will be initiated in June, 2000. Up to 5500,000 will be available for the second grant
cycle. Projects not funded in the first grant cycle may be resubmitted during the second grant cycle.
The Board will jointly consider the applications in all three grant categories without initially
allocating funds to each category. .
E1i~ible Applicants
Counties, cities, school districts, towns, and special taxing districts; assoCIatIons of local
governments; the Metropolitan Council, organizations and state agencies with a local government
partner; and organizations' established by twO' or more local governments under a joint powers or
similar agreements.
.
Grant Criteria
All applicants must indicate what other sources of funding have.been considered to implement the
project and explain why it is not possible to complete the project without State (i.e. Board) financial
assistance.
The Board is particularly interested in seeking applications that
. Propose an innovative idea for a cooperative planning, service budget management model,
or service sharing pilot project. An innovative idea includes an activity which has not been
previously funded by the Board; andlor
.
Focus on the improved delivery of an existing public service, as opposed to applications
that focus on new services; andlor
. may i~eage~cies as active partners.
--------
.-.........
Projects that have not been previously implemented'witbin the state may be given priority by the
'....
Board. '
.
Orant Cate~ories
Service Budget
Management
Model
Grants
One or more applicants may apply for funds to develop a model for
innovative service delivery. The model will identify a new means of
providing a service currently being delivered by the applicants,
utilizing their existing financial resources and improving the quality of
the service. Grants may not exceed $50,000. Grantees must agree to
implement the model once it is developed.
3
Cooperation
Planning Grants
Two or more applicants may apply for funds to develop a plan for
delivering a service or a program through intergovernmental
cooperation. Grants may not exceed $50,000. Grantees must agree to
implement the plan once it is developed.
Service Sharing
Grants
Two or more applicants may apply for funds to cover the one-time
only start-up costs of providing a fully-integrated service or program.
Grants may not exceed $100,000. Grantees must agree to implement
the shared service or program. i
rimeline
July I, 1999
Application packets will be available upon request.
.
September through
November, 1999
Applicant workshops
December 17, 1999
Seven copies of Pre-Applications must be received by the Board by
5:00 p.m. Pre-applications received after the deadline will not be
considered.
January 21, 2000
The Board will announce the pre-application scores and overall
rankings for all Pre-Applications accepted for review.
March 31, 2000
TwelVe copies of the complete Final Applications must be received by
the Board by 5:00 p.m. Applications received after the deadline will
not be considered.
.
May 26, 2000
The Board will armounce to which applications it has decided to award
grants.
_ All decisions of the Board are final.-
"..:'''' .__, ..F.. ._-~ ..
For more information, please contact.:
Jim Gelbmann
Executive Director
Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation
Third Floor, Centennial Building
658 Cedar Street:,,:
St Paul, Minnesota 55155
, , Telephone::'~~: 6511282-2390(w) 651n39-5575 (h)
Fax: ;-: 651/296-3698.,-~ .,'.
- . - ~.-r'"
_....-;.'" ......:..:.c.-,,;. ~",,,,,,,,:>,
E-mail: ...{bgic@emai1.com}.ortigelbman@uswest.net} ,
4.
Statutory
Goal
Eligible
Applicants
Maximum
Grant
Other I.
Requirements
A CAPSULlZED DESCRIPTION OF THE TUREE GRANT PROGRAMS
OFFERED BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION
A copy of the application must be provided by the applicants to the exclusive representatives (unions) certified under M.S.
179A.12 to represent employees who provide the service or program affected by the application.
A copy of the work product must be given to the Board upon completion, and the Board may disseminate it to other local
government units or interested groups.
If the project is not completed or implemented according to the terms of the grant contract, the board may require the grantee
to repay all or a portion of the grant.
All applicants must indicate what other sources of funding have been considered to implement the project and
explain why it is not possible to complete the project without state (Board) financial assistance.
Service Budget Management Model
Grants
To develop models for innovative
service delivery. Proposed models may
provide options to local governments,
neighborhood or community
organizations, or individuals for
managing budgets designated for the
delivery of a specific service.
Onenr.more applicants. Applicants
may be: a county, city, school district,
town, or special taxing district; an
association of local governments; the
Metropolitan Council; a local
government in conjunction with an
organization or a state agency; or an
organization established by two or more
local governments under a joint powers
agreement.
$50,000
2.
3.
4.
Cooperation Planning
Grants
To develop a plan for
intergovernmental cooperation in
providing services. The plan may
include an assessment of the costs and
benefits of intergovernmental
cooperation and the development of
model contracts or agreements to be
used to implement the plan.
Two or more applicants. Applicants
may include: a county, city, school
district, town, or special taxing
district; an association of local
governments; a local government in
conjunction with the Metropolitan
Council, an organization, or a state
agency; or an organization established
by two or more local governments
under a joint powers agreement.
$50,000
Service Sharing
Grants
To meet the startup costs of providing shared
services or functions. Start up costs must be
on~. time,. non-recurring costs associated with
a service sharing agreement. The proposal
must include plans to fully integrate a service
or function provided by two or more local
governments. Agreements solely to make
joint purchases are not sufficient to qualify.
Two or. more applicants. Applicants may
include: a county, city, school district, town,
or special taxing district; an association of
local governments; a local government in
conjunction with the Metropolitan Council,
an organization, or a state agency; or an
organization established by two or more local
governments under a joint powers agreement.
$100,000
. PRE-APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
The pre-application is intended to let applicants know how competitive their application is
before they put a lot of effort into developing a full application. A pre-application must be
submitted by the December 17th deadline to qualify for a grant. Pre-applications should be
sbortand concise and do not require a significant amount of detail about the proposed project.
THE BOARD STRONGLY DISCOURAGES HIRING CONSULTANTS OR GRANT
WRITERS TO WRITE THE PRE-APPLICATION.
_. r_.-_..___..... ", .... --._
.-., -. .'-' "
1. Read the application packet and call the Board's staff at 65.11282-2390 or 651/297-3367 if you
have any questions or need more information.
2. Develop a basic,i4ea for the project and determine which local governments and/or state
agencies are likely to collaborate with you. (The Cooperation Planning and Service Sharing
gi-arttS_require atleast'tW("-~applicants:) Keep in mind that the Board may give priority
consideration to ideas that are 'innovative (i.e. have not previously been tested in
Minnesota).
.
3.
If applicable, identify the state agency or agencies that may have an interest in the proposed
project. Contact an agency representative to begin discussing the project with the agency. If
you do not know who to contact, contact the Commissioner of the Agency or the Agency
Director. Determine .if the agency is interested in being listed as a partner on the pre-
;application..... If a state agency does opt to join as a partner~ it may be helpful to include with
your application a letter from the agency head descn'bing the potential statewide benefits of
the project.
4. Get the potential partners together and discuss everyone's ideas. A "convener" is usually
necessary to get the project initiated However, it is usually not very effective for one person
to fully develop the project and then "shop" for partners who are willing to go along.
5.
In collaboration with all potential partners, talk about the project from a conceptual point of
view. Please keep in mind the purpose of the pre-application is to minimize the amount
of effort you need to put forward prior to learning how competitive your application is
likely to be.
.
a. Determine which potential partners are to be included on the pre-application. At this
point in the process, we do not need fll'D1 commitments from all participating
jurisdictions. Participants can be added and subtracted prior to submitting the final
application.
b. Decide which grant category- is appropriate Jorthe proposal. Please call Jim
Gelbmann at 651/282-2390 if you would like assistance in selecting the appropriate
grant category.
c. Assign someone to complete the pre-application form and respond to the narrative
questions. Select someone who has a firm tmderstanding of what the project intends
to accomplish and can convey that concept in writing to the Board members who will
be reviewing and scoring the pre-applications. Identify individuals who can review
the draft pre-application prior to its submission to the Board
d. Develop an estimate of the cost of the project and make a preliminary determination
of how much money will be requested from the Board Detailed budget projections
are not required at the pre-application stage.
9
I'
PRE_APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS (Continued)
e. Determine who the contact person will be for the pre-application. This person should
be able to answer questions about the proposed project and budget.
6. If at all possible, have someone (preferably the individual writing the pre-application) from
the group of potential partners attend the applicant workshop. (Attendance is optional.)
7. Prepare the PRE-APPLICATION COVER PAGE and NARRATIVE. (The Pre-Application Cover
Page, and Narrative Questions and Format, have been inserted in the Application pamphlet.)
Answer all the questions on the COVER PAGE and be sure that all the issues in the NARRATIVE
FORMAT have been addressed. A complete Pre-Application must be received by the 5:00
pm, December 17, 1999, deadline in order to eligible to be reviewed by the Board.
8. Use the "Checklist for Mailing Your Pre-Application" (below) to be sure all
requirements are met.
9.
Mail or hand deliver the pre-application packet. Be sure the Board staff will receive it by
5:00 p.m. on December 17, 1999. Please do not fax pre-applications to the Board. Pre-
applications received after the deadline will not be considered. "
.
CHECKLIST FOR MAILING YOUR PRE-APPLICATION
Before you mail or deliver your pre-application packet, make sure that you have met all
these requirements:
~ Do you have a dated signature from the senior elected or administrative official
from one of the sponsoring units of government?
r::> If a state agency is included as a partner, have you included a letter from the ·
agency head explaining the statewide benefit(s) of this proposed project? (This
letter is merely a suggestion, it is not required.)
"-..------------ -
~ Have you included seven (7) copies of the complete Pre-Application Cover Page
and Narrative, and any letters from state agencies that are partners to the project?
~ If you want to be notified that the Board received your Pre-Application, did you
include the Pre-Application Postcard from the Pre-Application Packet? Did you
properly stamp and address the postcard?
~ Will the packet reach the Board's office by 5:00 p.m. on December 17, 1999? Did
you put sufficient postage and properly address the envelope so that the post office
won't return it?
10
SCORING SYSTEM
PRE-APPLICATION
To be eligible for consideration by the Board, all applicants must:
. State what other sources of funding have been considered by the local llllits of government to
implement the project and explain why it is not possible to undertake and complete the project
without assistance from the Board. ~,
The Board is particularly interested in seeking applications which:
.
propose an innovative idea for: 1) cooperative planning; 2) a service budget management
model; or 3) a service sharing pilot project. An innovative idea includes an activity which
has not been previously funded by the Board and is not already being implemented within the
state. If the application proposes a project that is similar to an initiative that has already been
implemented in the state, the pre-application narrative may include a discussion as to how the
proposed project differs from similar initiatives that have already been implemented and/or
why grant funds should be used for this initiative; and/or
.
. focus on improving the quality, effectiveness or efficiency of an existing public service; and/or
. include a state agency as a partner to the project
All eligible Pre-Applications will be evaluated and ranked using the following statutory point
scoring system.
Points (73) Criteria
15 The extent to which the pre-application demonstrates creative thinking and
intergovernmental cooperation.
.
20
The extent to which the proposed project is likely to improve the quality of the service
and to have benefits for other local governments ( i.e. the extent to which the project
is replicable).
20
The extent to which the pre-application reflects the statutory goal of the grant program.
15
The merit of the proposed project and the extent to which it warrants the state's
financial participation. When considering the merit of the proposed project, the Board
will focus on: (1) the extent to which the proposed project will improve service
outcomes; and (2) the ability of the applicant to define how the improvement in service
outcomes will be measured.
'"
.J
The expressed willingness of an applicant to repay grant funds if the project
successfully reduces the operating costs for the participating local governments. To
receive the three additional points, the project must have the potential to reduce
operating costs and the applicant must be willing to repay to the Board a percentage
of all savings based on the percent of fimding provided by the Board. The maximum
amollllt of repayment shall not exceed the total am01.mt of the grant.
11
A.
.
B.
.
0)
MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT
INNOVATION AND COOPERATION
.()~
#l:A
7~
PRE-APPLICATION NARRATIVE
GIDEON GLEN
PROPOSED APPLICANTS
The City of Shorewood will provide funding, staff assistance, education and
project management. The City of Tonka Bay will playa projected role in project
planning and education. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be
involved with project planning, potential class sharing, technical assistance, and
education.
PROPOSED PROJECT
The Gideon Glen Project will be a showcase collaborative ecology effort to
address multiple facets of an environmentally sensitive area along County Road
19 which runs between Shorewood and Tonka Bay. The project area is
undeveloped, heavily wooded with wetlands and water courses and is about 6+
acres in size. It is encountering increasing development pressures. The various
facets of the landscape preservation and restoration project include:
. Acquiring public control of land through purchase, conservation easement
or other means;
. Improving water quality (non-point source pollution and runoff from
County Road 19 and Tonka Bay's Smithtown Crossing Shopping Center
area) through stormwater ponds and natural wetlands, to control rate of
runoff, siltation and non-point source pollution into Gideon's Bay and
Manitou Harbor of Lake Minnetonka;
. Restoring and enhancing of regional wetlands areas;
. Preserving approximately three acres of old growth MaplelBasswood
forest;
. Preserving historical site-The Peter Gideon historical marker is located
in the project area (vicinity of the development of the "Wealthy" apple).
. Environmental education-In working with neighbors, senior groups,
local environmentalists and schools, an environmental educational facet
will be developed which may include videos, tours, signage, cross
easements for parking at current parking lots, a possible trail and
boardwalk with educational signage and kiosk, Minnetonka School
District#276's "Wetland Watch" program will include this area in their
education program and report at the Shorewood and Tonka Bay's televised
City Councils' meetings.
· Monitoring of wetland quality-The "Wetland Watch" program of School
District #276 would expand their program to monitor wetland quality
before, during and after the project.
· Improving bio-diversity through wetland plantings, forestry management.
This project is important because it addresses a problem which faces many
municipal jurisdictions in some way. That is, how do you approach sub-regional,
multi-jurisdiction, watershed problems. This project will be a model for other
jurisdictions to emulate. It will involve not only the applicants, but other
jurisdictions in cooperatively addressing problems to the benefit of each agency
rather than simply doing nothing.
Other jurisdictions being approached to assist in this project in addition to the
Minnesota Board on Government Innovation and Cooperation are:
.
· The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (The district board committed to
a partnership on the general project concept at their October 28, 1999
meeting.) Their contribution can be cost sharing, in kind and cash,
technical assistance, education.
. Metropolitan Council's Metro-environment Partnership Program
. Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services and Highway
Department (project planning, technical assistance, cost sharing)
. Department of Natural Resources (project planning, technical assistance,
cost sharing, education)
. Metro Greenways Program (project planning, cost sharing)
. Minnesota Land Trust (project planning)
. Board on Water and Soil Resources (project planning, technical
assistance)
. Minnesota Historical Society (project planning, cost sharing, technical
assistance, education)
.
The Shorewood Land Conservation and Environment Committee, a citizen-based
advisory committee to the Shorewood City Council considers this a top
community priority, and will be directly involved in the project development and
implementation.
The goal of the project is to promote water quality, public education and to
improve water quality in the Gideon Glen regional wetlands area through a multi-
jurisdictional, collaborative approach which can be replicated in other
jurisdictions throughout the state.
The objectives of the Gideon Glen project are to:
. Reduce current and prevent future non-point source pollution and
sedimentation from the sub-watershed into Lake Minnetonka;
. Provide wetland restoration and enhancement;
. address water quality problems for a sub-watershed where water runs
through several jurisdictions and into Lake Minnetonka;
. Provide a visible example (along County Road 19) of a successful,
collaborative effort, and provide public educational opportunities for a
wetland and mature Maple/Basswood forest area; and
. Address water quality and quantity issues by providing regional ponding.
. Implement local water management plans of Shorewood and Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District (education, water quality goals);
. Conduct performance monitoring activities for Phosphorus, sedimentation,
removal in accordance with NURP standards, Interim Strategy for Urban
Stormwater Design and local water management plans;
. Provide inter-agency efforts for water quality public education.
.
The total estimated cost for the project is $795,000. The breakdown is as follows:
.
Project Elements
Conservation easement/land acquisition costs
Site Improvements
Forestrylbio-diversity management, debris removal
PondlWetland Construction
Landscape Design! Aquatic Plantings
Education-Pre-, During, and Post-Construction
Public Education Materials: Fact Sheet,
Presentations, Videos, Tours
"Wetlands Watch" site work
KiosklInterpretive Signage
Access/Observation PointlTrails
Citizen-based, Hands-on Involvement
EvaluationIMonitoring activities
Water Quality Testing, ''Wetlands Watch" programs
Project Administration (Legal, Administrative)
TOTAL ESTIMATE PROJECT COSTS
Estimated Costs
$375,000.
10,000.
250,000.
40,000.
15,000.
5,000.
100,000.
$795,000.
c. BENEFIT
Many municipal jurisdictions are likely to have very important sub-watershed
district projects in the Capital Improvement Programs for years. There simply is
not a good funding mechanism to undertake such projects. It is especially
difficult to address such projects which are located in several municipalities. This
project will be a model collaborative effort using the joint resources of a number
of agencies and jurisdictions to accomplish the stated goals. The especially
unique element to this project is the public education and monitoring effort. We
will work with the Minnetonka School District in this effort. The project itself
and associated signage will be along Highway 19, a very busy county highway
through the cities of Tonka Bay, Shorewood and Excelsior.
D. THE NEED FOR STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Other funding sources available to the project hrrgely emphasize land and physical
improvements. A grant from the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and .
Cooperation will be used largely for planning, education, evaluation and
monitoring activities. Early commitment from the Board will be a great impetus
in the applicants' efforts to coordinate the financial resources that are necessary to
accomplish the project.
.
i
I
i '0
18
o
. ,L-I~ ~
. .IL)"j ~; t
.~ - r 12. '"
- ........11 , If-" I I ~~\:.. j~l~ft-" t , III
~
..
~:, ~e~ I I ~ '.c1 , ~~ _ I , ~
~
i...::::.... ! U R ll:: -; 1= ~ a
lJ= '. · \! J . ~
~ g-..:..... I' ~~ , r '~ ,1 ~' II
i= ""-';F', ~ " .L = · - ~ "... I-
l:iTI~k+ l~ I I I r1' i ':.'...::'
u j'-.-:\.\;(.,}. \ LW ll~"" 'jJ} ,J,.,,,, 4.....
I JJt:: ~- ':;' 'l: ~"1 11I.! .........
JM 0,- ..l & ~ c) , ...
~.I;( .~, A - --- . '~-.l ~
: ;1I1f-~ , ., -. -'t-t ~~' ~
· ~ Ii '''-" _ ~, _ .
':: '. . '. ::"( -." J. ;:;. · 1 i
;r- ULl. ".'. = R,_
!~ '~ ''''= .... r ~~! r-.....
' .... <= , . · .' anOP
i +:-;'1 ! ".::18:::, . . -," c-Ir -i i !
1\ L":;. UI T'.f/~Jt":::":::f.. _ j
~ I~ I 1 '''-l:;Q", " . .
ell:!= 1 r- -j:--4 . .:....i \~ { . .. .'- ..
'. ~
-r-I _,_, . ......" ,
\.J, tr :. ,_ .~ ~ ~~.~~~
W \ ~ _.:,,~
' ~ ""1 I J /; !iY; 1..:." _...:....
= 1 J _ ~! =.
~~(- = ,""='=rr, .
r I_~_, _ '\ = I
~~J .t~~, ;v-~,
..~~ ,.1, = -'::;;"& ==r ~!
'(~ ~JJ,:" tt,! 1 /
" ,--,-~, ,
ij '=~! c-
i"LJ. , t -!tt' Ii; lL-
i~1 'I~ P'iif\ /'
! !'\ ~ .1~ , ,f, J-
i;~~ , ....c ~.I)[!i
rqylU.,-l "I'"!=, I '.:..J y"b \ ,
~ r- " tI. ..; ~. II --:- !!!'. Cl/.
l: -I'): u~ ~ . ~ "d:. 'Lm.i
f Jt~ ~1!' \
1.' ,.. ~~ ,v 111 .....Ii v \1 \
! J '. l "=1.' ", \
; ..:::.;" """ ~. ., - ,. ~.' . \
I ! ~J.I "~(\\S\~~ -J. 'Y9!", i i \
' =- . :0;;; r- ~.,.. ..
' I ~ ~ J:" r-g'.... I . \~
' 0. ;jo" .Ii tJ\ '~ ,
.&; · I ~ ,. , r-:l \ _
'.\ II ;,'t- .F"'il. {p'. ,.
i , - ,- 1 l, ,- r- '" . . "? \".
CJ j' I\.[ lilt 4 ~~Hl '. ~ q,. \.\
t.d " -...,.....j - , "'- l! n . ". ~ \ .
z ~\; 1~\Jl1 !- "..'- "'" \.\.
.. =r 1.\'.., ...
t1 ~ ., , . ,
. Il!J. iii '. ".
~ \'" -e \\j ~\- ".
J I --, "\"
lT~. ~~11 ..;.'
Ii ~
6
:I
~
.
1r
N
o
/8
i
l 8
Q
."
=
!!.
.
/
.
I ~ II
2 ~ i ;
i i i i
: ' J
i f
~
"',t.
..
....
'..
'.
".
......
".
.,
....
.,
.'.
e,
"
....
@
MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT
INNOVATION AND COOPERATION
PRE-APPLICATION NARRATIVE
IJPI1.r-
~'1rr
A SOUTH LAKE MlNNETONKA VISION FOR A NEW MILLENIUM
A. PROPOSED APPLICANTS
The City of Excelsior, City of Greenwood, City of Shorewood, City of Tonka
Bay, City of Deephaven, the Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce, and many
other civic organizations in the South Lake Minnetonka area will be asked to
participate in the process.
.
Although there are a number of small cities and the South Lake Minnetonka area,
there is a long history of cooperative efforts. Some examples are:
.
. The South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department offers police service to
Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay.
. Those cities are being joined by the City of Deephaven in establishing a South
Lake Minnetonka Fire and Rescue Department.
. The five cities have jointly built the South Shore Senior Community Center.
. A collaborative of interested individuals from the five South Lake Cities have
been meeting for two years to address various issues relating to youth. They
are currently working on establishing a skateboard park.
. An organization of City Administrators was established eight years ago,
entitled Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities. There is a constant effort
within this group to find ways to work together to improve disaster
preparedness, training, and many other areas.
Although the cities in the South Lake area have a solid history of working
together, more and more it is taking the efforts of civic organizations, non-profit
groups, church groups, and individuals to address community problems. It is
important therefore to include everyone in an overall South Lake visioning and
planning process.
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
Society is changing. Change will come to the South Lake Minnetonka area
whether we are ready for it or not. We can develop a joint vision and prepare
ourselves in a connected fashion for the New MiIlenium or be left behind,
fragmented and unprepared.
The Minnetonka School District just completed a strategic planning process. The
entire South Lake Minnetonka area is within the Minnetonka School District. The
City of Shorewood has indicated an intent to begin a strategic planning process
during the year 2000. This project would involve the cities, other government
jurisdictions, non-profit organizations, churches and citizens in identifying a
community vision that can be shared by the entire South Lake Minnetonka area.
To have a shared vision and values to bind organizations together and working on
common pursuits, it is important to "have a vision of the cathedral as each
organization mixes its share of the mortar."
A number of goals will then be set, consistent with the vision, which will get each
city and organization pulling together.
It is important to have identified for the whole South Lake area a joint vision, key
values, and areas for collaborative action before cities and organizations plan as
separate entities. The steps of the process are anticipated to be as follows:
1. Come to an initial agreement on a direction, on what we hope to accomplish.
Representatives of the cities, key civic organizations and churches will be
invited to participate in this step.
.
2. Solidify the process, acquire funding to undertake the process, and undertake
an area-wide effort to encourage organizations and individuals to participate.
It is important at this stage to receive commitments from organizations to
participate in the process and to work together toward accomplishing the
outcomes.
3. Vision and value development. Undertake several well-publicized meetings to
establish a vision and values under which decisions should be made.
4. Undertake a strategic planning process including:
. Scanning the South Lake environment and selecting key issues to be dealt
with.
.
. Formulating goals for each key issue.
. Analyzing each issue and developing a list of related community strengths
and weaknesses.
. Developing strategies, taking into account identified strengths and
weaknesses.
. Implementing strategies together using public and private resources.
. Feedback-Have a series of public meetings to build energy for change
and to make mid-course corrections.
5. Action Planning-Build on the organizations' commitments to work together
toward the outcomes and to take the South Lake vision and plan into account
when each city and organization are doing their action plans.
6. ActionlImplementation in a collaborative fashion.
7. Evaluation Process-measure outcomes, and make corrections.
c. BENEFIT
The benefits of such a multi-jurisdictional, multi-sector, visioning and strategic
planning process are obvious. The end result should be not only the
municipalities increasing cooperative efforts, but the private and non-profit
sectors will be included in efforts to address issues which have traditionally been
addressed only by government.
.
Clearly during the process the question will be raised as to why there are so many
small cities in the area. It is likely that a recommendation may be to devise new
strategies for consolidating the provision of services.
Each of the cities which are completely separate politically, yet closely bound
socially and by geography, plan for the needs of their cities independently. It is
important to have a South Lake Minnetonka area vision and strategic plan which
each of the cities can take into account during their planning efforts and in which
each of the South Lake area organizations can keep in mind in their organizational
planning.
D.
THE NEED FOR STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
.
Each city and organization has their own priorities and fiscal restraints. Such a
project cannot be undertaken without the financial assistance of an organization
such as the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation which
encourages such collaborative, multi-sector planning efforts through planning
grants. It is estimated that consulting services, supplies, materials and public
relations will cost $60,000. $10,000 of it can be offered through in-kind
contributions of the various cities and organizations' staff time.
A.
.
B.
.
MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT
INNOVATION AND COOPERATION
~
D~J lrr.
;i.. .A.'
.' ~ ,.,.:] {}!If;r1lr....
. fjj. :1tr
. ~.7.. ~!.'
lii;..- "I .
..
PRE-APPLICATION NARRATIVE
EXCELSIOR/SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA
JOINT FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE START-UP
PROPOSED APPLICANTS
The cities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Deephaven, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay are
currently negotiating details of a governance structure for a five-city
Excelsior/South Lake Minnetonka Fire and Rescue Department. The entire area
has been served by the Excelsior Fire Department for over 100 years. Each of the
cities has contracted with the City of Excelsior for the service.
PROPOSED PROJECT
In 1999 a Special Fire Review Committee was established with representatives
from each of the cities to address the needs of the Excelsior Fire Department
going into the 2181 Century. The committee examined several major factors
effecting the operation and maintenance of the Excelsior Fire Department
including fire fighter membership and recruiting, response to medical calls,
potential alternative emergency medical services, age and capability of equipment
and station, and an in-depth study of costs of the department when compared to
similar fire departments. The final report of the committee, dated May 25, 1999,
included the following:
. The needs of the entire service area should be considered above the needs
of each individual city.
. Rather than contracting with the City of Excelsior for service, the Cities
should consider a united governing and ownership structure which might
better assure a common vision and jointly address department needs.
. Begin studying alternatives for refurbishing or replacing the current
inadequate fire station.
. Consider full-time professional management for our volunteer paid on-call
department.
. Educate citizens on the needs of the department.
. Initiate a program to recruit and retain paid on-call fire fighters and to
assure adequate response to daytime and rescue calls.
Each of the five cities accepted the report and indicated they were willing to
continue to participate in an effort to address these recommendations.
Since August of 1999 a committee of the mayors and representatives of each of
the cities have been meeting to address these issues. It is their intent to have a
draft joint powers agreement prepared for the cities to consider by the spring of
2000.
The joint powers entity will need assistance initially in three ways:
1. Consulting services will be needed for the initial establishment of
the joint powers governing board. Assistance will be needed in the
establishment of procedures and bylaws, identification of priorities, and
with strategic planning and implementation of recommendations of the
Special Fire Review Committee. It is estimated that the cost of such
consulting assistance is $50,000.
2. Assistance will be needed for a departmental human resources
analysis and full-time Chief/Administrator recruitment effort. The
estimated cost is $15,000.
.
3. Recommendation 2.c. of the final report of the Special Fire Review
Committee states: "Begin the process of examination of alternatives for an
adequate fire station.
Determine the basic needs
11 Examine alternatives and costs for each one
(1) Build and Refurbish
(2) One or two stations"
It is important that this recommendation be implemented immediately.
Consulting services will be needed in this process. The estimated cost for
consulting services to produce a facilities and equipment study is $50,000.
.
c. BENEFIT
The five small cities located in the South Lake Minnetonka area have determined
that it is important for the future of the Excelsior Fire Department that the cities
develop a joint ownership and management arrangement. It has taken over a year
of hard negotiations to come to a point where a joint powers agreement may be
ready for execution in the Spring of the year 2000. The new joint powers
department will have the goal of improving the quality of the service provided to
each community as we face the decades of the early 2181 Century. The main goal
to be addressed is to maintain a healthy department with members who will be
able to respond to calls any time of the day or night. The department needs new
facilities that in fact attract recruits.
D.
.
.
A new joint powers governing board will need organizational management and
technical expertise to guide them through their first year of existence. A grant
from the Minnesota Board on Innovation and Cooperation will assure an excellent
start for a new board.
THE NEED FOR STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
At the time the Joint Powers Board would be expected to begin to function. the
five cities will have just concluded a year and half of hard negotiations. There is
no agreement among the cities at this time on the governing structure. much less
how the structure will be able to be funded in its initial year. Two of the cities are
under levy limits. All of the cities have established their levy for the year 2000.
There is not sufficient cash reserves in the Fire Department, nor are there
budgeted funds in the department budget for the year 2000. The requested grant
from the Minnesota Government Board on Innovation and Cooperation will be
essential in getting the new Joint Powers Board off to a good start. The requested
grant may act as encouragement for the cities to execute the joint powers
agreement.
.
.
f
Check Approval List for 12/13/99 Council Meeting
Check # Vender Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
26988
26988
AmoUllt
26989
26990
26991
26992
26993
26994
26995
26995
26996
26996
26997
26998
26999
26999
27000
27001
27001
27002
27002
27002
27002
27003
27004
27004
27004
27005
27006
27006
PERA
PERA
TOTAL FOR PERA
ICMA RETIREMENT TR Deferred Comp 12/8/99
TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
CITY COUNTY CREDIT Credit Union 12/8/99
TOTAL FOR CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
AFSCME COUNCIL 14 Union Dues 12/8/99
TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14
PERA
PERA
Picture Framing
TOTAL FOR ARTWORKS
C.H CARPENTER LUMB Caulk
TOTAL FOR C.H CARPENTER LUMBER
ARTWORKS
CARGILL SALT DIVISIO Salt -Ice Control
TOTAL FOR CARGILL SALT DIVISION
EXCELSIOR ROTARY C Otrty Dues & Lunches
EXCELSIOR ROTARY C Otrty Dues & Lunches
TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR ROTARY CLUB
G & K SERVICES Uniforms & Mats
G & K SERVlCES Uniforms & Mats
TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES
HAMLlNE UNIVERSITY Residency
TOTAL FOR HAMLINE UNIVERSITY
JIM HATCH SALES CO. Barricade Flashers & Batteries
TOTAL FOR JIM HATCH SALES CO.
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99 442152
12/8/99 99079474
12/8/99 1034
12/8/99 1034
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99 02811
Recording Secretary
Recording Secretary
TOTAL FOR KEEFE, SALLY
MN CHILD SUPPORT P Child Support - C. Schmid 12/8/99
TOTAL FOR MN CIDLD SUPPORT PMT CTR
KEEFE, SALLY
KEEFE,SALLY
PAZANDAK, JOSEPH Mileage/See 125
PAZANDAK, JOSEPH Mileage/See 125
TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH
SHOREWOOD TRUE V Supplies
SHOREWOOD TRUE V Supplies
SHOREWOOD TRUE V Supplies
SHOREWOOD TRUE V Supplies
TOTAL FOR SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
12/8199
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8/99
12/8199
12/8/99
THOMAS MFG COMPA Players Bench 12/8/99 62658
TOTAL FOR THOMAS MFG COMPANY, INC.
Refund S/A Overpay - 25-117-23-43-0 12/8199
Refund S/A Overpay - 25-117-23-43-0 12/8/99
Refund S/A Overpay - 25-117-23-43-0 12/8/99
TOTAL FOR ATI Tide
WASTE TECHNOLOGY, Fall Leaf Drop Site
TOTAL FOR WASTE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
A TI Title
A TI Title
A TI Title
Fireside Comer
Fireside Comer
Refund Permit Fee - 23920 Yellowston
Refund Permit Fee - 23930 Yellowston
12/8/99 26651
12/8/99
12/8/99
$1,662.39
$1,524.41
$3,186.80
$1,571.00
$1,571.00
$1,252.80
$1,252.80
$146.10
$146.10
$59.27
$59.27
$131.60
$131.60
$678.36
$678.36
$53.00
$70.00
$123.00
$27.96
$304.29
$332.25
$200.00
$200.00
$102.33
$102.33
$240.00
$180.00
$420.00
$173.51
$173.51
$63.74
$180.65
$244.39
$6.50
$13.45
$31.48
$85.19
$136.62
$1,521.49
$1,521.49
$80.11
$50.70
$62.29
$193.10
$3,330.45
$3,330.45
$1.05
$42.00
Thursday, December 09, 1999
Page 1 of6
Check # Vender Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
Amollnt
27007
27007
27007
27008
27008
27008
27008
27008
27008
27008
27009
27010
27011
.
27012
TOT.4.L FOR Fireside Corner
NORTH STAR ICE ICE
NORTH STAR ICE ICE
NORTH STAR ICE ICE
TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 12/8/99 777630-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/8/99 780344-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/8/99 780344-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/8/99 780345-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/8/99 780359-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/8/99 780557-00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR & WINE 12/8/99 780557-00
TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
BROWNING FERRIS IN WASTE REMOVAL 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR BROWNING FERRIS IND.
COMP USA
12/8/99 63270-11
12/8/99 63272-11
12/8/99 72250-11
Backup Tapes
TOTAL FOR COMP USA
COORDINATED BUSIN Toner 12/14/99 147728
TOTAL FOR COORDINATED BUSINESS SYST
HARDRIVES, INC Pmt Voucher #1 - TH 7 Access Closur
TOTAL FOR HARDRIVES,INC
12/14/99 90230970
12/14/99
27013 EVERGREEN LAND SE TH 7/41 - ROW Acquisition 12/14/99 8695
27013 EVERGREEN LAND SE Chanhassen Easements 12/14/99 8708
TOTAL FOR EVERGREEN LAND SER VICE CO
27014 HOPKINS PARTS COM Maint Supplies 12/14/99 99848
TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY
27015 KENJARCHOINSURAN 98-99 Liq Liab Audit 12/14/99
27015 KENJARCHOINSURAN 98-99 Liq Liab Audit 12/14/99
27015 KEN JARCHO INSURAN Insurance Renewals - Computers 12/14/99
27015 KENJARCHOINSURAN Insurance Renewals - Liq Liab & Prop 12/14/99
27015 KENJARCHOINSURAN Insurance Renewals - Liq Liab & Prop 12/14/99
27015 KEN JARCHO INSURAN Insurance Renewals - Liq Liab & Prop 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR KEN JARCHO INSURANCE
. 27016 KAR PRODUCTS Supplies 12/14/99 658804
TOTAL FOR KAR PRODUCTS
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27017
27018
27018
27019
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - General
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Personnel
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Land Use
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Cabalka
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - USF&G
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - R. Johnson
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Ellers
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Gysland
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Johnson Concil Ct
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA Oct Legal - Smithtown ROW
TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY-..
LMCIT
LMCIT
1999-2000 Excess Liab Ins Renewal
1999-2000 GL Ins Renewal
12/14/99 341837
12/14/99 341838
12/14/99 341840
12/14/99 341841
12/14/99 341842
12/14/99 341843
12/14/99 341844
12/14/99 341846
12/14/99 341847
12/14/99 341848
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99 52006812995
$43.05
$79.20
$126.24
$149.88
$355.32
$238.45
$230.05
51,080.38
$123.95
$68.31
$809.71
$1,265.71
$3,816.56
$39.80
$39.80
$113.84
$113.84
$171.64
$171.64
$131,569.61
$131,569.61
$183.94
$4,833.53
$5,017.47
$30.52
$30.52
($88.00)
$295.00
$327.00
$1,092.00
$2,246.00
$2,874.00
$6,746.00
$339.45
$339.45
$1,752.60
$640.00
$180.00
$48.00
$3,507.35
$376.50
$601.70
$833.59
$240.65
$1,901.50
$10,081.89
$7,517.00
$48,539.00
$56,056.00
$8.63
$8.63
TOTAL FOR LMCIT
MINNCOMM PAGING Pager Rent
TOTAL FOR MINNCOMM PAGING
Thur;sday, /)ecember 09, 1999
Page 2 of6
.
.
"
Check # Vender Name
Description
Check Date Invoice #
12/14/99
12/14/99
27020
27020
27021
27021
27021
27021
27021
27021
27021
27021
27021
27022
27023
27023
27023
27023
27023
27023
27023
27023
27024
27025
27026
27027
27028
27029
27030
27030
27031
27032
27033
27034
27034
27034
27034
27034
MN SUN PUBLICATION Legal & Employment Ads
MN SUN PUBLICATION Legal & Employment Ads
TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
12/14/99
Amount
$91.00
$664.80
$755.80
$94.17
$127.60
$117.81
$106.47
$79.48
$72.32
$34.52
$9.59
$16.08
$658.04
$110.60
$110.60
$129.44
$348.28
$343.94
$1,435.89
$58.42
$35.37
$298.64
$225.41
52,875.39
$1,386.18
$1,386.18
$69.65
$69.65
$50.99
$50.99
$1,508.33
$1,508.33
$208.19
$208.19
$763.56
$763.56
$516.25
$159.75
$676.00
$207.00
$207.00
$1,723.00
$1,723.00
$449.30
$449.30
$73.49
$210.87
$45.09
$45.09
$84.80
$459.34
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
TOTAL FOR MINNEGASCO
MINNETONKA-C1TY OF Water Purchases 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR MINNETONKA-ClTY OF
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
NORTHERN STATES P 11/99 Utilites 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER
ORONO, CITY OF NOV ANIMAL CONTROL 12/14/99 1305-99
TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF
PEPSI COLA COMPANY POP PURCHASE 12/14/99 33578320
TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY
POMMER COMPANY, I BENSMAN PLAQUE 12/14/99 46647
TOTAL FOR POMMER COMPANY, INC.
POTTS, KENNETH N. Nov Prosecutions 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR POTTS, KENNETH N.
LUBRICATION TECH, IN Degreaser 12/14/99 196589-0
TOTAL FOR LUBRICATION TECH, INC
SATELLITE SHELTERS, Shelter Rental 12/14/99 21479701
TOTAL FOR SATELLITE SHELTERS, INC
SHOREWOOD TREE R Tree Removal 12/14/99 1667
SHOREWOOD TREE R stump grinding 12/14/99 1677
TOTAL FOR SHOREWOOD TREE RES1DENT1A
SOUTHWEST CONTRA Equipment Rental- Freeman Pk Net P 12/14/99 94714
TOTAL FOR SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY
STAR TRIBUNE Employment Ads
TOTAL FOR STAR TRIBUNE
12/14/99
SPEEDWAY SUPERAM Motor Fuel 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA
Communication 12/14/99
Communication 12/14/99
Telephone 12/14/99
Telephone 12/14/99
Telephone 12/14/99
TOTAL FOR US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
T/Jursday, December 09,1999
Page 3 of6
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amollnt
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - OMR Ret Wall 12/14/99 $3,710.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - I & I Reduction 12/14/99 $496.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Christmas Shores 12/14/99 $110.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Cntry Club RdlCR19 12/14/99 $3,931.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Freeman Pk Shelter 12/14/99 $179.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - GIS & Tope Mappin 12/14/99 $51.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Plan Review Waters 12/14/99 $192.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCtA TE Oct Engineering - Shady Is Lift Stn 12/14/99 $285.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering. Shorewood Ponds 12/14/99 $5,912.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - TH 7 Access Close 12/14/99 $344.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - TH 7 Access Closur 12/14/99 $10,476.25
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering. TH 7/41 12/14/99 $3,387.01
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Water Mgmt Plan 12/14/99 $232.50
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - West End Wtrmain 12/14/99 $5,125.90
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering -NSP Water Extensio 12/14/99 $978.90
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Sept Engineering - Wtrfd PI Bldr Wall 12/14/99 $3,784.00
27035 WSB AND ASSOCIATE Oct Engineering - Glen Rd Deliniation 12/14/99 $2,055.75
TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIATES $41,252.81
27036 TOTAL REGISTER SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/14/99 8570 & 8571 $54.85
. 27036 TOTAL REGISTER SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/14/99 8570 & 8571 $54.85
TOTAL FOR TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS $109.70
27037 BELLBOY CORPORA TI Liquor 12/14/99 17806200 $169.80
27037 BELLBOY CORPORATI Liquor 12/14/99 17806400 $169.80
27037 BELLBOY CORPORA TI Liquor 12/14/99 17806600 $169.80
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $509.40
27038 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY Supplies 12/14/99 30899300 $82.24
27038 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY Misc & General Supplies 12/14/99 30899600 $105.28
27038 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY Misc & General Supplies 12/14/99 30899600 $147.17
27038 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY Misc & Gen Supplies 12/14/99 30915500 $84.92
27038 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY Misc & Gen Supplies 12/14/99 30915500 $96.71
TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $516.32
27039 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 12/14/99 5069-11 $855.95
27039 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 12/14/99 5090-11 $957.50
27039 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 12/14/99 5146-11 $240.00
. TOTAL FOR DAHLHEIMER DIST INC $2,053.45
27040 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER & MISC 12/14/99 1150-11 $18.40
27040 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER & MISC 12/14/99 1150-11 $4,081.77
27040 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER & MISC 12/14/99 1152-11 $3,942.20
27040 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER & MISC 12/14/99 1152-11 $37.60
27040 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 12/14/99 1315-11.5 $589.80
TOTAL FOR DAY DISTRIBUTING $8,669.77
27041 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TY Misc 12/14/99 9537 $54.90
27041 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TY Misc 12/14/99 9541 $93.30
27041 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TY Misc 12/14/99 9544 $54.90
TOTAL FOR FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COM $203.10
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137450 $232.32
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137451 $1,502.71
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/14/99 137452 $1,534.06
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137456 $77.44
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137457 $513.14
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/14/99 137458 $556.29
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137483 $154.88
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 137484 $834.90
TI,ursday, December 09, 1999 Page 4 of6
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amollnt
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/14/99 137485 $407.78
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 139673 $213.15
27042 GRIGGS. COOPER & C Liquor 12/14/99 139674 $139.67
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 139675 $124.41
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liquor 12/14/99 139676 $258.58
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Wine 12/14/99 139696 $124.44
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C Liq 12/14/99 139697 $148.41
27042 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 12/14/99 524266 ($44.82)
27042 GRIGGS. COOPER & C LIQUOR 12/14/99 524772 ($368.92)
TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $6,408.44
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Wine 12/14/99 1047793 $1,159.95
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Wine 12/14/99 1047794 $1,926.50
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Beer 12/14/99 1047795 $24.95
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Wine 12/14/99 1047796 $958.70
27043 JOHNSON BROS LIQU Wine 12/14/99 1049626 $206.85
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Wine 12/14/99 1049627 $791.40
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU Wine 12/14/99 1049628 $311.40
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/14/99 106528 ($519.00)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/14/99 106529 ($61.59)
. 27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/14/99 106530 ($184.40)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 12/14/99 106531 ($50.25)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/14/99 106645 ($114.23)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 12/14/99 106646 ($96.66)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 12/14/99 3205308 ($10.63)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 12/14/99 3205309 ($3.53)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 12/14/99 3205310 ($2.75)
27043 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 12/14/99 3205311 ($22.04)
TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $4,314.67
27044 LAKE REGION VENDIN Mise 12/14/99 7728 $299.31
27044 LAKE REGION VENDIN Mise 12/14/99 7729 $489.78
27044 LAKE REGION VENDIN Mise 12/14/99 7730 $571.41
27044 LAKE REGION VENDIN Cigarettes 12/14/99 7749 $217.68
27044 LAKE REGION VEND IN Cigarette 12/14/99 7751 $571.41
TOTAL FOR LAKE REGION VENDING $2,149.59
27045 LAKESHORE WEEKLY Publish Res 99-095 12/14/99 18153 $47.50
. TOTAL FOR LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS $47.50
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 21873-11 $90.55
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 21873-11 $5.068.00
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 26369-11 $150.30
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 26369-11 $1.941.80
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 49163-11 $24.35
27046 MARK VII BEER & MISC 12/14/99 49163-11 $2,685.75
TOTAL FOR MARK VII $9,960.75
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 $31.45
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 $31.45
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 $42.07
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 $42.08
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 33 $118.15
27047 MARLIN'S TRUCKING Freight 12/14/99 33 $118.15
TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING $383.35
27048 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA Wine 12/14/99 120302 $144.00
27048 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA Wine 12/14/99 120303 $225.00
27048 PAUSTIS WINE COMPA Wine 12/14/99 120304 $73.00
TI,ursday, December 09,1999 PageS of 6
Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amollnt
TOTAL FOR PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY $442.00
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/14/99 3205314 ($6.33)
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/14/99 3205315 ($4.99)
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 12/14/99 3205316 ($3.55)
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/14/99 553742 $354.00
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 553743 $589.40
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14199 553743 $613.90
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & wine 12/14/99 553744 $807.15
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & wine 12/14/99 553744 $1,530.30
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 553745 $646.90
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 553745 $636.10
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 555275 $80.00
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 555275 $997.25
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 555276 $80.00
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Liquor & Wine 12/14/99 555276 $1,618.05
27049 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI Wine 12/14199 555277 $460.05
TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $8,398.23
27050 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30080-11 $177.70
27050 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30080-11 $6,445.55
. 27050 THORPE D1STRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30100-11 $260.00
27050 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30100-11 $8,418.25
27050 THORPE D1STRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30210-11 $143.15
27050 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER & MISC 12/14/99 30210-11 $6,727.45
TOTAL FOR THORPEDISTRIBUTINGCOMPA. $22,172.10
27051 WINE COMPANY (THE) Wine 12/14/99 30663 $288.05
27051 WINE COMPANY (THE) Wine 12/14/99 30664 $91.00
TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE) $379.05
27052 WORLD CLASS WINES. Wine 12/14/99 87550 $195.00
TOTAL FOR WORLDCLASS WINES,INC $195.00
TOTAL CHECKS $348,259.45
.
Tllursday, December 09, 1999
Page 60f6
1f
Payroll Register
Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date
2105007 ANDERSON JOEL L 168.95 1217/99
2105008 BASTYR CONNIE D 614.81 1217/99
2105009 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,677.16 1217/99
2105010 BURL SUSAN E 166.43 1217/99
2105011 CARIGNAN DEANN M 60.84 1217/99
2105012 DAVIS CHARLES S 875.82 1217199
2105013 DUFFY DAVID C 186.09 1217/99
2105014 FLORA CHERI L 130.62 1217/99
2105015 GROUT TWILA R 718.02 1217/99
2105016 HEBERT KATHLEEN A 630.44 1217/99
2105017 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 630.42 12/7/99
2105018 HELLING PAMELA J 639.37 1217/99
2105019 HEURKINS MARK K 390.15 1217/99
. 2105020 HURM JAMES C 1,815.65 1217/99
2105021 JAKEL BRIAN D 44.32 1217/99
2105022 JOHNSON DENNIS D 950.07 12/7199
2105023 LATTERNER SUSAN M 464.95 1217/99
2105024 LEDWITH JAMES 48.31 1217/99
2105025 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 835.47 1217/99
2105026 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 1217/99
2105027 MASON BRADLEY J 879.36 1217/99
2105028 MITL YNG SARA J 382.60 1217/99
2105029 NAAB THERESA L 731.83 1217/99
2105030 NICCUM LAWRENCE A 1,192.98 1217/99
2105031 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 958.79 1217/99
2105032 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,243.29 1217/99
. 2105033 POUNDER CHRISTOPHER J 965.73 1217/99
2105034 RANDALL DANIEL J 938.25 1217199
2105035 RICH MELANY M 452.89 1217/99
2105036 ROLEK ALAN J 1,200.04 1217/99
2105037 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 496.23 1217/99
2105038 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 870.06 1217/99
2105039 SW ANDBY DONALD R 992.03 1217/99
Total of Checks $22,392.07
Tuesday, December 07,1999
Page 10ft