Loading...
101199 CC Reg AgP .. .,. ~.' 4' CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1999 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love Stover Garfunkel Lizee Zerby B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Executive Session September 13, 1999 (Att.-#2A Minutes) B. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes September 27, 1999 (Att.-#2B Minutes) C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 27, 1999 (Att.-#2C Minutes) D. City Council Work Session Minutes October 4, 1999 (Att.-#2D Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space Over 1200 Square Feet (Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution & Planner's Memorandum) Applicant: T.O. and A. V. Kvalseth Location: 4980 Shady Island Circle B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Variances for Front Yard and Bluff Setbacks (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution) Applicant: Scott M. Olson Location: 6125 Ridge Road C. A Motion Approving a Policy on Leave of Absence (Att.-#3C Staff Memorandum) !:'.,\ .. " ... CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. OCTOBER 11, 1999 PAGE20F3 D. A Motion Approving a Release of Escrow for Tree Preservation and Reforestation (Att.-#3D Planner'sMemorandum) Property Owners: Tim and Amy Haugen Location: 6030 Spruce Hill Court NOTE: Give the pubUc an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on Joint Park Commission I Park Foundation Meeting Held September 28, 1999 (Att.-#5A Draft Minutes) B. Report on October 2, 1999 Neighborhood Walk - Howards Point Road/Grant Lorenz Road C. Discussion on Policy Setting Trail Standards 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative 7. GENERAL A. 7:15 p.m. - Presentation by Sally Koenecke, LMCC Director, on Proposed 2000 Budget and Motion Regarding Budget Proposal (Att.-#7 A Proposed Budget) B. Consideration of a Motion Approving 1999-2000 Winter Trail Activities Permit (Att.-#7B Proposed Permit) C. Consideration of a Motion Regarding Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative Vacancy D. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Extending the Senior Housing Moratorium (Att.-#7D Proposed Ordinance) 8. ENGINEERlNGlPUBLIC WORKS A. Consideration of a Request for Street Light at the Intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street (Att.-#8A Engineer's Memorandum & Petition) B. Consideration of Responses From Eureka Residents About Extension of Water (Att.-#8B Engineer's Memorandum) 4"'~ ""'. .. .. " CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. OCTOBER 11, 1999 PAGE30F3 _c. Consideration of a Motion to Accept Proposal for Professional Services from WSB - Gideon Glen Wetland Delineation (Att.-#8C Proposed Resolution) D. Consideration of a Motion to Accept Proposal for Professional Services from WSB - Freeman Multi-Use Building (Att.-#8D Proposed Resolution) 9. REPORTS: A. Administrator & Staff Attorney's Report on Smithtown Road Right-of-Way Options (Att.-#9A Attorney's Report) B. Mayor and City Council A. Report on Fire Department Review Committee Meeting Held September 28, 1999 B. Report on Chamber Meeting Held October 5, 1999 C. Report on Local Government Officials Regional Forum Held October 7, 1999 D. Discussion on Request for Proposals for City Attorney 10. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att.-#lO) { 1 ~ i .~, \ <:s"' <:::r ~?~~ ~ f?- ~~ r-;:e. ~ I t)-~~ ~~~~1 "" ~~ '<\:. t.{\ r...r " r ~ N ~ ~ ~ t-f ~ ()o rJ rJ '" ~ ~r{ .~ !::> /- . ,10 ~CG~nW1~~ Whereas the City of Sh<lrevoood has asked the residents of ElKel<a Road to consider a ' r-n&~ToJ.,3l999 ~; be placed along Eureka Road between SmithtOYtfl Road and Highway #7. The fotlOVlA residents, I in order to more fully evaluate the city's proposal, request that the City of ShoreWJOd iJye to the residents an estimate of costs of both the water-main and the rebuilding of Eureka Road. -'--- -, - '.---- 'f',. ~ C. I ','\Ilo f. .,..~ :"J :~ 11. ,.. ~ , " ,( , ,~ -. ,. ,~ , : i".' : j', ;.i ~, .,. i""~': ". CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council RegUlar Meeting Monday, October 11, 1999 Agenda Item #3A: The enclosed resolution approves a conditional use permit for Torald and Amy K valseth to build accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet. The resolution is consistent with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation and includes a requirement that the small building near the lake be removed or moved into compliance with shoreland setback requirements. A provision restricting another building on the property from being used as a dwelling has also been included. The Planning Director has prepared a follow-up memorandum explaining the difference between the Kvalseth's case and other properties with nonconforming accessory buildings. The most significant distinction being that they are demolishing the existing dwelling, upon which any accessory structures would normally have to be removed (an accessory structure can not remain on a property without a principal dwelling). Approval of the conditional use permit requires a four-fifths vote of the City Council. Agenda Item #3B: At its last meeting the Council directed staff to prepare a resolution approving bluff and setback variances for Scott Olson to build a new home at 6125 Ridge Road. The enclosed resolution includes the recommendations of staff and the Planning Commission. Approval requires a four-fifths vote by the City Council. Agenda Item #3C: This motion approves the sick leave absence policy recommended at the last City Council work session. The motion is presented in the packet. Agenda Item #3D. Tim and Amy Haugen have requested a return of the escrow for reforestation of their property at 6030 Spruce Hill Court. The replacement trees that were planted as a condition of their building permit differ somewhat from the approved reforestation plan for the property. Staff agrees that the resulting landscaping complies with the spirit of Shorewood's tree preservation and reforestation policy; It is also consistent with two other cases where variations to the policy have been approved by the Council. The Planning Director recommends approval of the escrow release. A simple majority vote by the Council is sufficient for approval. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Executive Summary - City Council meeting of October 11, 1999 Agenda Item #5C: Enclosed in the packet is a memorandum from the City Engineer regarding issues raised at the last Council meeting on the discussion of payment for additional costs associated with changes of trail design. This relates to the residents along Vine Hill Road requesting a concrete sidewalk. Agenda Item #7 A: Sally Koenecke, the Administrator of the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, will be present to present the Commission's 2000 budget. Agenda Item #7B: The action requested is a motion identifying the winter uses to be permitted on the regional trail. This permit is to be submitted to the Hennepin County Park Board by October 15. The trail use permit in the packet is as has been presented in the past, including snowmobiling, but it does not list horses. Agenda Item #7C: The term of Bob Rascop as the City's representative on the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) is up October 27. If the Council wishes to advertise the position, including it in the newsletter, you would not be able to interview until November 8. A copy of the press release from three years ago is included in the packet. . Agenda Item #7D: Three months ago the City Council extended the senior housing moratorium until the end of September, which was the deadline for the Comprehensive Plan submission. That deadline has now been moved back to the end of the year. Therefore, an ordinance has been prepared extending the moratorium to December 31, 1999 should the Council feel it desirable to extend the moratorium. Agenda Item #8A: This motion is a request for installation of a street light at the intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street. City policy is that residents within a 5oo-foot radius are notified for a public information meeting. If approved, the petitioners must bear the cost of installation. The City will then accept the light for ongoing energy and maintenance costs. Agenda Item #8B: A letter was sent to the residents of Eureka Road indicating that water was to been installed in Freeman Park unless the residents indicated otherwise. Four responses were received, two in favor of watermain down Eureka, and two opposed. Staff will continue to tally input received over the weekend and on Monday and present the findings. Agenda Item #8C: This is a motion to accept the proposal by WSB and Associates for the wetland delineation for Gideons Glen (formerly the Glenn Road Drainage Project). This proposal is for wetland delineation and survey. Total cost of the proposal is $4,750.00. The MCWD has indicated that these costs will be reimbursed to the City by utilizing Rule B funds. Staff is recommending approval of the motion. . Agenda Item #8D: This proposal by WSB and Associates, and Luken Architecture is for the final design, soil borings, and construction administration for the Freeman Park Multi Purpose Building. The total cost of the proposal is 16.3 percent of the total project cost. This is within the expected range of costs for this size project. Staff is recommending approval of the proposal provided by WSB and Associates, Inc. ... ....... . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD IMMEDIA TEL Y FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION QRAFtir \...- Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 10:26 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby; and Consultant Tom Allen B. Review Agenda 2. DISCUSSION WITH CONSULTANT TOM ALLEN REGARDING CITY ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Councilmembers discussed the City Administrator's performance review and came to a consensus on how to proceed. 3. ADJOURN Mayor Love adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR .jt2Pr . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 6:15 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE WORK SESSION MEETING DRAFT Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 6: 19 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Stover, Lizee and Zerby; Administrator Hurm, Finance Director Rolek and City Engineer Brown. Absent: Councilmember Garfunkel B. Review Agenda The agenda was accepted as presented. 2. DISCUSSION ON SICK LEA VE POLICY Staff recommended that a six month leave of absence without pay commencing 10/1/1999 through 3/31/2000 be granted to Public Works employee Jeff Jensen while he is recuperating. It was noted that the City would be required to his medical insurance expense for October, November and December. The Council members indicated that the City would continue to pay his medical insurance expenses through March, 2000. 3. ADJOURN Zerby moved, Lizee seconded, to adjourn to Work Session at 6:33 p.m. Motion passed 4/0. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1fze CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPfEMBER 27, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. DRAFT A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Councilmembers Stover, Lizee, and Zerby; Administrator Hurm; Shama Wahlgren for City Attorney Keane; Finance Director Rolek; Director of Public Works Brown; and Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Councilmember Garfunkel . B. Review Agenda Mayor Love read the Agenda for September 27, 1999. Councilmember Lizee stated she would like to remove Item 6A from the agenda. Additional information provided by the MCWD shows a vacation of the easement would be a moot point. Lizee moved, Stover seconded to remove this item from the agenda. Motion carried. Stover moved, Zerby seconded to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes September 13, 1999. Stover moved, Zerby seconded approving the Executive Session Meeting Minutes of September 13, 1999 as presented. Motion passed. . B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 13, 1999. Lizee moved, Stover seconded approving the Regular Meeting Minutes of September 13, 1999 as amended: Page 7, 3rd paragraph, 3rd sentence, add "on the LRT" to the sentence. Motion passed. C. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes September 13, 1999. No action taken. This item was continued to the next meeting. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Zerby moved, Stover seconded approving the Motion contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolution therein: 4FZ~ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27,1999 - PAGE 2 Motion to Approve a Sign Applicant: Location: Dave Mueller, Control House Investments 23075 State Highway 7 Motion passed 4-0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments. 5. PARKS REPORTS A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held September 14, 1999. " Commissioner Themig reported on the matters considered and the actions taken by the Park . Commission at their September 14, 1999 meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). B. Recommendation on Vacancy Created by Resignation of Bill Colopoulos Commissioner Themig stated the Park Commission is recommending the vacant position be filled after the first of the year when the term expires. Council members concurred that the Park Commission vacancy not be filled until 2000. C. Recommendation on a Policy Setting Trail Standards Commissioner Themig explained how the need for a policy was determined when considering standards for trails in Shorewood. He explained bituminous trails are the most cost effective method of constructing trails. He indicated they are more durable and appears to be the most consistent form of trails throughout the metro area. He stated an eight foot wide bituminous trail is being recommended by the Park Commission. He indicated an eight foot trail is a standard width. Mayor Love asked if there were any in the audience who would like to make comments. There were several people. Mayor Love noted action would not be taken this evening. Bruce Ebner, 5670 Vine Hill Road, stated if this is the best proposal being put forth, he would prefer nothing be done. He stated he and his neighbors are requesting a sidewalk. He didn't believe a bituminous trail was appropriate in front of a residence. He discussed the benefits of concrete vs. bituminous. He was concerned about the long term goals for Vine Hill Road. Brett Helgeson, 5640 Vine Hill Road, stated he was excited about the plans for a trail system. He noted the yards aren't very deep, and he was concerned about the degradation of bituminous. He agreed with Ebner's comments. He wanted the job done right the first time. He preferred a sidewalk rather than a bituminous trail. Council member Zerby stated the trail recommendation indicates a material will not be . -.J CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27,1999 - PAGE 3 recommended, but the residents would be asked to pay the additional cost. Helgeson stated to have it done right, he would be willing to pay some of the cost. The amount should be negotiated, however. Corrine Kubal, 5620 Vine Hill Road, stated it is a safety issue in the winter time, because there is no place for children to stand to wait for the bus. She stated she called the City of Minnetonka to find out what their plans are for Vine Hill Road. It was indicated there are no plans for the next five years. She believed the two cities should work together and apply for State funding for the project. Charlie Fox, 5660 Vine Hill Road, indicated he would have nothing if given the choice of an eight foot path. He stated he is opposed to paying for a sidewalk. Mayor Love discussed his involvement with the Citizens' Committee on Trails and their consideration of trail widths. . Councilmember Stover stated she was in favor of flexibility and neighborhood input. She stated she would like information from staff on cost comparisons, maintenance costs, durability, ground condition variabilities before this is discussed the next time. She stated some of the sidewalk in Waterford was paid for by the developer. Councilmember Zerby stated we are continuing to move forward on the trail system. Engineer Brown stated once we get to the bidding stage, an alternative for concrete would be offered. Weare still in the design stage of the process. Councilmember Zerby believed it should be put on the next meeting's agenda Councilmember Stover stated she would also like information on the possible cooperation between Shorewood and Minnetonka on Vine Hill Road. . Engineer Brown stated Minnetonka asked some time ago if Shorewood had any plans for the upgrading of Vine Hill Road. Minnetonka is requesting that Shorewood consider it in their Capital Improvement Program in the future. He noted it is outside of the five year Capital Improvement Program. Mayor Love thanked the Park Commission and citizens for their comments. Commissioner Themig stated it is their intent to move the process forward and to continue to work with the citizens. D. Preview of the September 28 Joint Meeting with the Park Foundation Commissioner Themig stated a meeting will. be held on September 28 to discuss park dedication fees. He discussed the purpose and goals of the Park Foundation. He discussed the need to pool funds to operate and improve park facilities and reduce the amount of tax dollars needed for park maintenance. He reviewed maintenance costs and revenue sources. He stated the intent is to get the Foundation to set goals and develop fund raising activities. t.- CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27,1999 - PAGE 4 6. PLANNING REPORTS Commissioner Turgeon discussed the recent public hearing held for the Comprehensive Plan. It was not well attended. One chapter, Housing, is left to be completed. It has been suggested a joint meeting be held on October 19 to discuss the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Turgeon reported on the matters considered and the actions taken by the Planning Commission at their September 4, 1999 meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A. Public Hearing 7:15 p.m. - Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding a Request to Vacate Certain Easements for Watten Ponds This item was removed from the agenda based upon new information presented by the Watershed District on the status of the area in question. B. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding a Request to Vacate Certain Easements for Christmas Shores . Planning Director Nielsen stated when the property was originally platted, there were a number of easements that would have to be vacated. The developer's attorney sent a letter requesting the vacation of six easements. Staff has indicated one should not be vacated, two should, and questions remain on three of them. The request has been revised, and the two recommended by staff are the only ones which will be vacated. Staff recommended the vacation of the two easements. Stover moved, Lizee seconded approving RESOLUTION #99-086, "A Resolution Approving Request to Vacate Certain Easements for Christmas Shores Plat." Motion carried 4-0. C. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Publication of a Summary Ordinance Amending the L-R, Lakeshore Recreational District Section of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance Planning Director Nielsen discussed the intent to publish only the summary of the ordinance. He . recommended approval. Lizee moved, Zerby seconded approving RESOLUTION #99-087, "A Resolution Authorizing Publication of a Summary Ordinance Amending the L-R, Lakeshore Recreational District Section of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance." Motion carried 4-0. D. Consideration of a Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space Over 1200 Square Feet Applicant: T. O. and A. V. Kvalseth Location: 4980 Shady Island Circle Planning Director Nielsen reviewed the request for a conditional use permit for accessory space over 1200 square feet. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions that the smaller building near the lake meet setbacks or be removed, and the larger be inspected to find out if it has plumbing. Nielsen reported it does have plumbing but does not have a kitchen. A condition will be incorporated that the building will not be converted or used as a dwelling. The applicants still have to submit a survey showing the ordinary high water mark. ---4 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES . SEPTEMBER 27,1999 - PAGE 5 Zerby moved, Lizee seconded directing staff to prepare fmdings of fact for a conditional use permit for accessory space over 1200 square feet subject to Planning Commission recommendations. Motion carried 4-0. Ms. K valseth discussed inconsistencies with the handling of this item by staff. He stated another resident built an addition over 1200 square feet and were issued a building permit. They did not have to supply a survey with the ordinary high water mark. They never had to come before the Planning Commission and had accessory structures on their property which did not have to be removed. She stated they should be allowed to keep the smaller building. She was also unclear about the motion which was made. . Todd K val seth stated the small building is used for cleaning fish and as a sauna. He didn't think it was fair they had to remove the building. Councilmember Stover discussed the preparation of findings of fact. She indicated anything provided prior to the preparation would not be included in the findings. Planning Director Nielsen stated if there is any instance where a house is demolished, the accessory structures must be removed. The property identified did not have the house removed. He stated the Planning Commission will be discussing accessory structures in the future. Mayor Love asked the Council if there is a motion to reconsider the preparation of findings of fact. There was no motion. E. Consideration of a Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact for Front Yard and Bluff Setback Variances Application: Scott M. Olson Location: 6125 Ridge Road . Planning Director Nielsen noted the existing house is close to Ridge Road, but the new house would be further back. It would still not meet setback requirements. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request. Lizee moved, Stover seconded directing staff to prepare fmdings of fact for front yard and bluff setback variances for Scott Olson at 6125 Ridge Road to include staging and scheduling of equipment and tree preservation. Motion carried 4-0. 7. GENERAL A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing a Tax Rate Increase for the 1999 Tax Levy, Collectible 2000 Mayor Love opened the public hearing. Finance Director Rolek stated a public hearing must be held whenever. a tax rate increase is proposed. He reviewed the proposed tax levy for 1999-2000. He explained how the adjusted levy certificate tax rate was calculated. He explained what the impact would be on a median value home in Shorewood. He explained how the tax rates would, in fact, go down. ... CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 - PAGE 6 There were no public comments. Mayor Love closed the public hearing. Zerby moved, Stover seconded approving RESOLUTION #99-088, "A Resolution Authorizing a Tax Rate Increase for the 1999 Tax Levy, Collectible 2000." Motion carried 4- O. B. Discussion of Request by Charles Daisy City Administrator Hurm stated staff has been contacted by Mr. Daisy's attorney. David Valentini, attorney for Charles Daisy, stated Mr. Daisy's vehicle is under forfeiture as the result of an alcohol-related offense. He stated the Judge suggested he speak before the City Council regarding the vehicle forfeiture. He discussed the history of the issue. He believed the vehicle forfeiture was a harsh penalty. He indicated the Judge wants to hear what the City Council's opinion is before she moves forward on the litigation. Ken Potts, prosecuting attorney for Shorewood, stated he initiated a forfeiture in this case according to State statute. He stated per the current City policy the vehicle would have to be bought back at market value. . Councilmember Zerby asked what the process has been in the past where a forfeiture is concerned. City Administrator Hurm stated the policy has been to not negotiate a return of the vehicle, and the vehicle is sold at auction or through sealed bids. Mayor Love stated he doesn't feel compelled to change the policy at this time. Kate Lynch-Bix, 25545 Orchard Circle, asked what the cost for litigation would be to the City. Mr. Potts discussed the cost of litigation being around $2,000. Councilmember Zerby stated Mr. Daisy made the decision to drive the vehicle while under the . influence. He stated he was in favor of negotiating. Councilmember Stover preferred to follow the current policy. Councilmember Lizee concurred. Attorney Wahlgren stated a motion clarifying the Council's position would be helpful. Zerby moved, Stover seconded to ratify the current policy and not enter into negotiations per the current request by Mr. Daisy. Motion carried 4-0. 8. ENGINEERlNGIPUBLIC WORKS A. Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Expenditures of Funds for Wiring of Amesbury Well House Engineer Brown reviewed proposed expenditures for wiring of the Amesbury well house. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 - PAGE 7 Lizee moved, Stover seconded approving RESOLUTION #99-089, "A Resolution Authorizing Expenditures of Funds for Wiring of Amesbury Well House in an Amount Not to Exceed $20,000." Motion carried 4-0. ' 9. REPORTS A. Administrator & Staff i. Attorney's Report on Smithtown Road Right-of-Way Options Attorney Wahlgren stated she understood City Attorney Keane is looking into options for how to proceed. Mayor Love asked if this could be ready for discussion at the next meeting. . Attorney Wahlgren believed it could be completed. ii. Report on Status of Comprehensive Plan - Joint Meeting - October 19 Planning Director Nielsen stated a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and City Council is proposed for October 19. Councilmembers concurred. iii. Report on Lease Agreement for Installation of PCS Antennas With APT Minneapolis, Inc. City Administrator Hurm reported on negotiations with APT Minneapolis, Inc. The main area of discussion is fees. The City is very interested in a high range in the spectrum of fees. APT will be considering their options, and no agreement exists at this time. iv. Report on Fund Raising Efforts by Friends of Southshore Center . City Administrator Hurm reported the Friends of Southshore Center will be expanded to create a Friends Support Group, and a drive is proposed. Active Council support has been requested.. v. Report on Proposed House Burn City Administrator Hurm noted a Fire Department bum is proposed. Neighbors have been notified. vi. Engineer's Report on Concerns Expressed by Island Residents Engineer Brown reported three concerns were brought up by Island residents during their trail walk. Roads have been patched, ditches have been mowed, and trees have been trimmed. He reported the hydrants are working and continue to work. He explained how the hydrants are tested. vii. Engineer's Report on Trunk Highway 7 Access Closures Engineer Brown stated a notice will be in the newsletter and sent to residents regarding the access closures. He stated a request for barricades at Lake Linden has been made, and permanent barricades will be installed. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27,1999 - PAGE 8 viii. Administrator's Report on Upcoming Meeting Sponsored by Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation City Administrator Hurm stated a meeting will be held to discuss public service in the new millenium and addressing fiscal challenges. He stated the president of the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce is looking to start a forum of area business leaders. Councilmember Zerby asked if there has been any action on the Glen Road billboard. Attorney Wahlgren understood litigation has not commenced. B. Mayor and City Council i. Report on Fire Department Review Committee Meeting Held September 14, 1999 Mayor Love reviewed action taken at the last Fire Department Review Committee. Another . meeting is scheduled for September 28. Mayor Love stated the first meeting of the Land Conservation and Environmental Committee was held on Thursday, September 16. Councilmember Zerby discussed a proposal for a sign which would identify meeting nights. The sign would hang below the existing sign. Zerby moved, Lizee seconded to approve the purchase of three signs. Motion carried 4-0. ii. Discussion on Usage of LCD During Meetings Councilmembers reviewed the presentation used during the meeting. 10. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS . Lizee moved, Zerby seconded adjourning the regular meeting at 9:09 p.m. subject to approval of claims. Motion passed 4-0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Clare T. Link Recording Secretary ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . . .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE MEETING D RA~1 Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love, Council members Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee, and Zerby; Administrator Hurm; and Lieutenant Nieling 2. MEETING PURPOSE Mayor Love discussed the purpose of the meeting. He explained that no action would be taken. He stated the City has been informed by Hennepin County that horses will be allowed on the trail. He stated comments would be taken from residents adjacent to the trail followed by other residents and non-residents. Each person would be allowed to talk for three minutes. The record would be held open until Monday, October 11. He stated that he recognizes this is a controversial subject. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Joel Turunen. 26355 Peach Circle. stated he lives adjacent to the trail. He stated snowmobiles go by his residence in excess of the speed limits on an occasional basis. He believed the problem has diminished because of increased patrols in the area. He believed that 99% of the snowmobilers obey the laws, and noise is not a factor. He encouraged the use of snowmobiles on the trail. Paula Berndt. 25855 Smithtown Road. asked if horses would be allowed year round or during the winter. Mayor Love stated the winter use is when they would be used. Ms. Berndt stated snowmobiles are a threat to her, her children, and dogs while they are on the trail. She stated snowmobilers travel very fast and ignore stop signs. She suggested the use of the trail by only Shorewood residents or only allow the use until dark. Pat Olson. 25775 Smithtown Road. stated she would like to see snowmobiling eliminated as a use on the trail. She stated there is an ongoing problem with snowmobilers running over trees on her property. Her biggest complaint was being told to use "911" to complain about snowmobilers. Lieutenant Nieling stated the use of'911" is encouraged and not just for medical purposes. Ms. Olson was concerned about snowmobilers finding out who is making the complaint calls. She stated she uses the trail for walking, but it is a problem during the winter with snowmobile use. Mayor Love stated he has heard the concern about using "911." Lieutenant Nieling stated the calls are a matter of public record, and calls coming over the scanner are heard by residents with that kind of equipment. Phil Marty. 5740 Smithtown Way. stated the trail is a way to get to trails in other parts of the county. He stated a benefit of the snowmobiling is the trail is groomed. He believed the trail should remain open for snowmobilers. 1FZ]) .... CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 4, 1999 PAGE 2 Gre20rv Berndt. 25855 Smithtown. stated snowmobile tracks have come as close as 40-50 yards from the house. He was concerned about the loss of trees on his property from snowmobilers. He believed it was a safety issue. Peter Kizilos-Clift. 26395 Peach Circle. stated he is not a big fan of snowmobilers, but he is willing to compromise. He stated snowmobilers frequently violated curfew on the trail. He believed any compromise should be enforced. He also stated there were numerous wine and beer bottles which raised his concern for drunk driving. Andrea TurnQuist. 6095 Cathcart Drive. stated she would prefer to have the trail used for non- motorized uses. She was concerned about the trail's maintenance, particularly garbage on the trail. Ann Meldahl. 6180 Cathcart Drive. stated everyone knows the pros and cons of the trail. She stated it is dumb to have motorized vehicles sharing the trail with pedestrians. She stated snowmobiles have their place, but she didn't think they should be on the trail. Pat Arnst. 5480 Teal Circle. was concerned about the way the residents who have complained to SLMPSD have been singled out. She believed it was in very poor taste to be publishing the addresses of those who have complained. Dan Puzak. 23830 Smithtown Road. stated individuals should not be singled out for letting their views known. He stated he supports snowmobiling. He stated the trail is a great resource for those who snowmobile. He noted the number of complaints have gone down. He stated the goal is to have responsible snowmobiling on the trail. . Brian Leffers. 5970 Strawberry Lane. stated he supports the sport of snowmobiling and agreed enforcement was important. He believed speed limits should be followed. Robin Dodson. 26540 W. 62nd Street. thanked the Council for having an open meeting to let residents voice their opinions. She stated she is in favor of snowmobiling. She believed the trail was the only place safe for pedestrian usage. She didn't understand why it is safe in the wi.nter with mixed uses when it isn't in the summer. She has been concerned for her safety. She believed there . has to be one place to walk where it is safe without snowmobiles. Duane Laurila. 5955 Eureka Road. stated he isn't against snowmobiling but wondered about the use in Shorewood. He was concerned about the speed limits. He believed it was an enforcement issue. He discussed the lack of use of the trail in the winter because of safety concerns. Resident. 6555 Hardin2 Lane. stated he believed snowmobiling should be prohibited on the trail because of safety and noise concerns. He asked how the decision can be made. Mayor Love stated the trail use must be decided at the next City Council meeting. Mr.??? suggested snowmobiling be allowed either on the roads or on a wider trail. Robin Dodson. 26540 West 62nd Street. asked if it costs the City of Shorewood more to enforce the trail use. She was concerned about asking for more enforcement for those who use the trail when the majority of them are not Shorewood residents. .~ .,A . . CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 4, 1999 PAGE 3 Mayor Love was convinced that the level of enforcement is as much as the public safety officers can provide. City Administrator Hurm stated the police officers stated there are costs associated with the use of snowmobiles used for enforcement. Lieutenant Nieling stated the department has applied for grants which pay for a portion of the enforcement. Councilmember Stover stated it appears there is a need for two officers to enforce the trail. Those officers are paid time and a half. Mayor Love reiterated the record will be kept open until Monday, October 11. He stated the issue of horses will also be discussed at that time. He thanked everyone for their comments and how they conducted themselves. 3. ADJOURN Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded adjourning the meeting at 7:50 p.rn. Motion passed 5-0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Clare T. Link Recording Secretary ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . ",. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.neUshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 7 October 1999 RE: K val seth - Accessory Buildings Fll-E NO.: 405 (99.16) At its last meeting the City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution with findings of fact, approving a conditional use permit for Amy and Torald K valseth. The attached resolution is consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations. Staff was also asked to address two issues relative to the Kvalseth's case: 1) an updated survey; and 2) accessory buildings on other properties. . The question of the survey has been resolved. At the last meeting the applicants provided an updated survey of the property, showing the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. This confirmed that the larger of the two accessory buildings complies with lakeshore setback requirements. The K valseths cited other properties that had nonconforming accessory buildings that were not required by the City to be removed. As explained at the last meeting the distinction between the examples cited and the K valseth property is that in none of those cases was the principle dwelling being demolished. The most specific example used by the applicants is a property at 4955 Shady Island Road. That property has two nonconforming accessory structures, one of which is a boathouse that extends into the water. The owners of that property did a significant remodeling and addition project. Their accessory space was already in excess of 1200 square feet. Instead of increasing accessory space they actually reduced the size of the attached garage by approximately 60 square feet. In the proceSS the setback for the garage was changed from six feet to 12 feet, eliminating a nonconforming setbeck. The existing home was simply remodeled, not demolished. The K valseths have the same opportunity. #,J.A n ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER . . "" Memorandum re: Kvalseth C.U.P. 7 October 1999 A better and very recent example to the Kvalseth proposal is the Kracker C.U.P. on Christmas Lake. In that case, the applicant demolished an existing home and were required to remove a utility building that was too close to the lake. In fact, the attached resolution was modeled after the Kracker resolution. It may be worth noting that the Planning Commission discussed this issued subsequent to the K valseth's public hearing. At least some members of the Commission felt that the City may want to consider extending its policy of removal of nonconforming accessory structures to all conditional use permits, not just those where a house was being removed. This would be within the authority of the conditional use permit process and will be the subject of a future study seSSIon. Staffs earlier recommendation remains unchanged. The conditional use permit should be approved subject to removal of the accessory building near the lake or moving it into compliance with the Code. As you know, I wiIlJ:)_~Qllt()fl()Wl1 <illril1gtl1ene){twe~k. Ifquestions remainplease contactrne. after 18 October and I will be prepared to answer them at the next meeting. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Amy and Torald K valseth 2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY SPACE TO TORALD AND AMY KV ALSETH WHEREAS, Torald and Amy Kvalseth (Applicants) are the owners of real property located at 4980 Shady Island Circle, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described as: "Lot 38, and the Southeasterly 31.00 feet of Lot 39, Shady Island, Lake Minnetonka"; and . WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a new home with attached garages, the area of which garages, when combined with other accessory buildings on the property will be 1826 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in memoranda to the Planning Commission dated 3 September 1999 and 7 September 1999, which memoranda are on file at City Hall; and . WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 September 1999, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 27 September 1999, at which time the Planner's memoranda and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the total proposed accessory space (1826 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above grade of the principal structure (2396 square feet). . . 2. That the total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R-IA1S Zoning District in which it is located (4,000 square feet). 3. That design and materials of the garages are consistent with the architectural character of the proposed home. 4. That the proposed garages comply with all setback requirements for the R -1 AlS District. 5. That an existing accessory building near the shoreline is 30 feet too close to the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka CONCLUSION 1. That the application of Torald and Amy Kvalseth for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth herein above be and hereby is granted. 2. That this approval is subject to the following: a. That the proposed garages will be used strictly for purposes of a residential nature. b. That the Applicants are hereby advised that the City Code provides specific regulations relative to home occupations and any future use of the garage for other than allowable residential purposes would have to comply with such regulations. c. That, prior to the City inspecting the framing for the new house, the existing nonconforming accessory building near the lake shall be removed or moved into compliance with all setbacks for the R- IAlS zoning district. d. That an existing larger accessory building on the property shall not be converted to, or used as, a dwelling. Specifically, kitchen facilities shall not be installed in the building. 3. That the City AdministratoriClerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this Resolution for fIling with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. -2- ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 11 th day of October, 1999. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR . JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . -3- " ' -'. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SETBACK V ARlAJ."iCES TO SCOTT OLSON WHEREAS, Scott Olson (Applicant) has an interest in the real property located at 6125 Ridge Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the property is located entirely within the bluff adjacent to Silver Lake; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to demolish an existing home on the property and replace it with a new home; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a front yard setback variance and a variance from the bluff setback requirement in order to build the new home; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 2 September 1999, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 September 1999, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 27 September 1999, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the lot contains 39786 square feet of area, is 175 feet wide at the building line, and is located in the R-IA/S zoning district. 2. That the existing house on the property is nonconforming with respect to bluff and front yard setback requirements. 3. That the new house, shown on Exhibit B, will comply better with the front yard setback requirement than the existing house. -1- #3. 8. . . 4. That the proposed house will comply with the ISO-foot setback from Silver Lake. 5. That the existing house on the property has experienced damage due to drainage problems that will be corrected by locating the new house further back from the street. 6. That strict adherence to the bluff, front yard and lakeshore setback requirements would render the lot unbuildable. CONCLUSION 1. That the Applicant has satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under Section 1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has established an undue hardship as defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 462.375, Subd. 6(2). 2. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's request for setback variances to construct a single-family dwelling as shown on Exhibit B, attached. 3. That this approval is subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to the start of any site work, including demolition of the existing house, the Applicant must erect construction limit fencing and erosion control barriers. b. The Applicant's site plan should be revised to include a combination parking space/pullout on the north end of the site. c. Site grading and drainage shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. d. The Applicant must submit a landscape and tree preservation plan, prepared by a registered landscape architect for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a building permit. d. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the home, the site must be landscaped per the approved landscape plan referenced in d. above. e. The Applicant must provide a plan for managing construction traffic and deliveries of materials! as part of his plans for construction of the new home. 4. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. -2- . . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 11th day of October, 1999. ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administnltor/Clerk Woody Love, Mayor -3- . . . _ L..,~~.~_~~~~~e+"" ff That part of Government Lot 7, Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 2, Township 116, Range 23; thence North 29 degrees 19 minutes East, 668.5 feet; thence South 68 degrees 11 minutes East, 110.7 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence North 19 degrees 32 minutes East to an intersection with a line parallel with and 150 feet Northeasterly, measured at right angles, from said 110.7 foot line bearing South 68 degrees 11 minutes East; thence North 21 degrees 49.minutes East, 25 feet; thence South 68 degrees 11 minutes East to the shore of Silver Lake; thence Southwesterly along said shore line to an intersection with a line bearing South 68 degrees 11 minutes East from the actual point of beginning; thence North 68 degrees 11 minutes West to the actual point of beginning. For purpose of this description the South line of said Section 36 is assumed to be a due East and West line. Records of He~epin County, Minnesota. .' .. l."ki\',t. At. o (f)(J)r :c->.en O~O ;0;02 ~o;o OG)m Omen ~-n- _.-v0 sOm zEJ2 (') m' ES6Hl~ K'~ ',"!!' 6! ~19 "'.1 ~n.nS ,,~S~ t~: t ':I'~S .,.... !.......,. .,1\ OIOt o:MJt '~m UJ P!W~" lBl!q~{i ~ Qu'l , . ~~1J _ ''OJI. '::l'''',,,~ I 1.1.- ~1.:' Z I~ ).<a,."i~ r<<ii3,c!'N..,.<9;! Mv..~~4 C?'<fM )I~".) <1~ Q~"'d1i. }', I~/ ~.lIl? t?J\lf , :~~~ ~"-= ' . It / 'oJ'S 'J gFIk. ~ ai -,. 'd's lo7,'~ ~ , I ...1-& 111 'I ':l-~ Ilht ',j',s "I b '-.:\'S o-p I JtJnl~-:~J"'l"l'rt. - .ldO:> o. ~,_I 'L - _ --,j -----.JI.... ~ j.o,l '/0/ ~..,'>J --.-.- ~n<;,'t\'f 'l.~ WI>'l':3/l1J{1 "')cN9 .-1.l"07':3 f ~i j:J3(} , -\-\-JtloJ , JN9 t ~(lOt\ '" il :+ ~ i , 3~~~ ~,.:ndlltffi ,,,<1),, tae.OmJ O::31QWN ~ 0 l-iVM-aJI'lI<< EJ,lcl,l){ k J...tM ",,"'Q ''J)/a? ..-Vr;;- ~~ ~~ 1~~~ Q'lai ",le;lxa / I \ I I ~ I ,051-_.____ I ~ 1--- I I I ~ () . 1\!ol},_JW'l,N - e,~I"'l~'~~' W"'.., -\0'\ \1 tJ/"" ~'2C .,.~. '~"~~"''(l , I I , I '- CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www,state,netlshorewood . cityhal1@shorewood,state,net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor ail.d City Council James C. Hunn, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public W orks ~ October 6, 1999 FROM: . DATE: RE: A Motion to Approve Leave of Absence During the City Council work session conducted on September 27th, it was discussed that one of public works employees has requested a 6-month medical leave of absence. Based upon that discussion, Staff is recommending approval of a motion to grant a leave of absence for Jeff Jensen, and that cost of health benefits, as currently being provided in addition to any rate increases caused by the health provider, would be paid for by the City of Shorewood through the period of March 31,2000. . 3C ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ~ A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state;netlshorewood . cityhal1@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DA TE: 6 October 1999 RE: Haugen - Request for Release of Landscape Escrow FILE NO. Property: 6030 Spruce Hill Court Tim and Amy Haugen have requested the release of the reforestation escrow that was required for their building permit at 6030 Spruce Hill Court (see Exhibit A, attached). The landscaping that was ultimately done for the lot differed somewhat from the landscape plan submitted for their building permit and some of the substituted plants are smaller than what is required for tree replacement. . The property owners point out that despite some of the trees being smaller than required by the City's Tree Preservation and Reforestation Policy, they have actually planted more trees than originally required. Upon inspection of the site and review of the actual landscaping, the result is considered by staff to be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the City's policy. Consequently, approval of the release of the escrow is recommended. It should be noted that the difference in standards used by foresters versus nurserymen will be addressed in a proposed amendment to the tree policy later this year. Cc: Jim Hunn Larry Brown Tim Keane Tim and Amy Haugen "a.D. ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ,< September 28, 1999 -., Ie {~-I~" .;;::-;:.::-. nllr- :~I:\i/."r-..- iL" '- . -. . ," .;::::,- , '~t -:1 'n/,'. ..,...... ., U' I . .l. ; ! iCCC : ft.'.! . .tJ.J. -, ~ :i../ 8" 7=: Nfr. Brad Neilson City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Neilson, . As we discussed recently, my wife and I had a professional landscape firm perform several key projects at our new residence. One of those important projects was to plant several new trees to replace the trees we had removed to accommodate the construction of our new residence. We were notified by the City of Shorewood that we needed to plant 8 new trees of2 !12" in diameter to replace the removed trees or 6' Evergreen Trees. My wife was recently told that 3 of the trees planted were not of adequate size in diameter and that the city of Shorewood would not release the $9,400.00 currently held in escrow from January 315\ 1999. One solution you mentioned, Mr. Neilson, was to add up the total diameter of the 10 new trees that were actw1lly planted to see if we met the requirement as a whole. The results: . 1 Evergreen tree @ 8' feet taIl (requirement calls for 6' feet 1aII) - 2 Evergreen tree's @ 7 Y2' feet taIl (requirement calls for 6' feet taIl) 1 Linden tree @ 2 12" in diameter - 2 Crab Apple trees @ 2" in diameter 1 Crab Apple tree @ 1 %" in diameter - 2 Eastern Redbud @ 2 14" in diameter 1 Eastern Redbud @ 2 %" in diameter - The remaining 7 have a total diameter equal to 15 ~" surpassing the required 12 w' total inches needed to satisfy the City of Shore wood. (Note: 3 of the trees planted are Eastern Redbud which are clump trees like birch so their diameters were determined by adding up the diameters of the multiple trunks at BH.) Also, please keep in mind four addition thoughts: 1. We are very aware of tree preservation and happily chose to keep as many trees on our property as possible -our estimated guess is around 60 trees of substantial size we kept rather than clear cut for a back yard as others have done. ~bi-\A . 2, We actually planted 10 new trees, not the required 8. And I might add only three were "cheaper" evergreens, making this an expensive endeavor, especially when trying to meet the citf s size requirements. We purposely planted several ~ue" trees as opposed to just planting the "cheaper" trees in order to meet the city requirement as many other homeowners have done. 3, My wife did not understand the BH abbreviation and therefore did not make the landscaper's aware of the measurement of the new trees to be done at breast height not knee high. which is commonly used in the landscape industry. Why did the city adopt something that is not standard? 4. We have come to understmd that the landscaper planted the 3 slightly smaller tress in question because their supplier's (Bachman's) trees of the size required were damaged in the hail storm last year and they felt were not of adequate quality - especially when they are guaranteeing the trees themselves for 2 years. These trees were planted in a garden setting, not just plopped in the yard, so I hope you can understand our unwillingness to have them replaced at this point Mr. Neilson please let me know the outcome of your decision we are naturally anxious to retrieve our $9;400.00 as soon as possible. Thank you for your time and understanding. ~ I~ &N~.1f Tim and Amy Haugen 6030 Spruce Hill Comt E"{celsior, MN 55331 474-6699 . 2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSIONIPARK FOUNDATION JOINT MEETING TUESDA Y, SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMr--~ 7:30 P.M. MINUTES DQ.a~T. i _~ . r 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSIONIPARK FOUNDATION ME.ETING Co-chair Arnst called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. A. Roll Call . Present From Park Commission: Co-chairs Arnst and Dallman; Commissioners Berndt, Puzak, and Themig; City Administrator Hurm; Council Liaison Zerby Absent: Commissioner Bensman Present From Park Foundation: Gordy Lindstrom (Member at Large), Brian Lieffers (Tonka United Soccer), Don Kronberg (American Legion), Don Kelly (Rotary Club), Brian Tichy (South Tonka Little League), Bill Keeler (Member at Large), Jim Wilson (Tonka Football Association) Absent: Scott Hanson (South Shore Softball), Robert Noren (Senior Representative), Don Aslesen (Mtka Youth Hockey Assoc.), Tad Shaw (Mtka Comm. Education Service), Jim Latterner (Tonka Men's Club) . Commissioner Arnst explained the reason for the meeting was to: . Review the purpose of the Park Foundation, . Go over the cost history and financial future on the maintenance, operation and improvements of the parks and trails, . Discuss options of park improvements that have been developed by the Park Commission, . Get input and set goals for the Park Foundation to raise some funds and develop a time line. Commissioner Themig showed an overview on the purpose of the Park Foundation, its goals, and the costs to maintain the parks. JF5A Park Commission September 28, 1999 Page 2 Commissioner Arnst explained that the Park Commission had a brainstorming session in August and came up with the "Options for Financing Park Improvements." The Park Commission needs money to finance the trails, Skate Park and Freeman Park Multi- Purpose building. The Commission has approached City Council to seek their support. Council agreed to explore funding options as long as the Park Commission agreed to look for additional revenue sources. The "Options for Financing Park Improvements" has not been brought to City Council, nor has the Park Commission as a group discussed any of the options. Commissioner Dallman explained that the Park Foundation talked about the park building 8 or 9 years ago and at that time the estimated cost was $40,000. Now it is at $250,000. Construction of the multi-purpose building will begin in the spring. Another project is the trails. The trail for Vinehill/Covington will start in the spring. It was asked if the city could work in conjunction with Minnetonka on VinehilL Commissioner Dallman said that it has been looked at, but Minnetonka said it might be several years before they will do anything. It was explained that MSA funding is one way to go for-trails. Mr. Keeler stated that it is hard to visualize as trails, they sound more like sidewalks. Also, it is hard to categorize trails into parks. . Commissioner Puzak explained the Youth Coalition and their intent to build a skate park. The coalition consists of business leaders, churches, schools, youth and South Lake cities. The two locations being considered are Manitou Park and the Old Highway 7 Rest Area North of Old Market Road. The range for building a skate park is from $25,000 to $300,000. The youth felt that the Old Highway 7 location is not difficult to get to and that the trail is not that far away. There is also a stoplight on Highway7 to use for crossing. The plans for the multi-purpose building for Freeman Park were reviewed. The Park Commission is hoping to get bids in February and start construction in March. It was explained that there would not be an ice rink right away, but hopefully in the year 2001. Mr. Keeler asked why the free skating had to wait and suggested the parking lot area be used for skating in the winter. The Park Commission didn't see why free skating would have to wait and will review this option. . In previous meeting there was discussion on how the Park Foundation talked about starting a fundraising project and getting a brochure once there was a building. Foundation fundraising is going door-to-door, corporation-to-corporation to raise funds for the parks. Mr. Wilson expressed that this Foundation has been in existence for a while and there has not been an effort. He feels that there is going to have to be someone hired to do the fundraising. Mr. Keeler stated one problem is that corporations or individuals want to give to the community where they are located. A second problem is usually the company will tell you they will match what you give, but there is no seed money to do this. There are really no businesses in Shorewood. Thirdly there is not enough effort. Park Commission September 28, 1999 Page 3 The Legion and Tonka Men's Club is donating $2,500 each and the Foundation hopefully will come up with the other $5,000 for the park building. The money has not been received from the Legion or Tonka Men's Club as the Foundation is still waiting to proceed and see what the other organizations come up with. It was asked if $5,000 is a realistic goal. One of the problems is going out to the community and saying the money is for the parks. The first reaction is that it is the City's responsibility. It is a lot easier to say we need $25,000 for a skate park. It is a different appeal than thinking it's for fertilizer for one of the parks. Having figures and brochures makes it even more appealing to get funds. . Jim Wilson apologized for being out of touch with the football organization. He explained that he is a football coach and hasn't been invited or knows if there is a board that meets, nor does he know if the football league has any money to donate. He stated that he would make some phone calls and see. It was explained that the Park Commission wasn't looking at the organizations individually but as the Foundation collectively. Mr. Keeler explained that some were At Large and they represent the city and the others are on the Foundation because they have the same interest. He added that the Park Commission needs to come up with a figure and let the organizations and Foundation know what they need. Commissioner Puzak explained that the Park Commission needs help with raising funds for two items: 1) the multi-purpose building and 2) the skate park. He asked if the Park Foundation could commit to raising money. Mr. Keeler stated that you need to show the people what is being done and then ask them for donations. He said he could go out and ask but he needs something to show people. . There was discussion about going to the organizations for user fees and maintenance fees. It was said that a large number of people using the parks are non-Shorewood residents and that is one thing against Shorewood. Some communities contribute less than Shorewood. Tonka Bay and Spring Park contribute very little space. Excelsior, Deephaven and Greenwood do not provide any green space for organized sports. This would be good information for user fees. Mr. Wilson suggested that the Park Commission explain to the sports organizations that there is maintenance and capital improvements, etc. and this is the dollar amount expected. Fees have to go up just like the organizations charge more to play the sport. The Park Commission has to say this is what you want, you cannot say give us what you can afford. One of the reasons for the Park Foundation is to find other sources of income. So much of Shorewoods Park Foundation is based on the one established is Roseville in the 1960's. They.have a lot of different ways to raise money, such as charity balls, golf outings; a lot of community based activities. It was suggested doing something like Excelsior did with Park Commission September 28. 1999 Page 4 bricks in the playground. A fundraiser like that could be done with the multi-purpose building or Skate Park. The Roseville Park Foundation started not with just parks. It was community-based activities. A lot of the people got involved in the fundraising. The spirit of it caught. Roseville has an advantage because businesses are there, where Shorewood has very few businesses. Some ideas that were brought up were to figure out activities that can generate enthusiasm for the people that live in the South Shore community. Ideas were: golf outings, buying a brick, silent auction, and raffle tickets. Council Member Zerby asked if the Park Foundation has the spirit to do this. It was felt that they do have the spirit and maybe it's the skills that are lacking. Or perhaps there is not the leader to say this is the idea and this is how we should do it. Maybe a professional organizer is needed. Commissioner Berndt stated that the multi-purpose building could be a destination for non-organized sports and people on the trail. The multi-purpose building could generate money from people stopping along the way to purchase something. . Commissioner Themig explained that the Commission talked about user fees and that is the next step after the Park Foundation starts the fundraising. Also, the Commission will look at other ways to generate revenue. It was asked again if the Park Foundation was willing to move this forward and if they had the excitement to keep the process moving. Mr. Lieffers of Tonka United Soccer stated that he was drafted by Tonka United to sit on the Foundation as a representative. If he had known that the purpose was to knock on doors and raise money he would have said no. If he has to raise money, he will not do that. He is here to listen to things that are going on and bring it back to Tonka United and represent Tonka United's view at the park meetings. He stated that Tonka United does not want the building out at Freeman. Tonka United wants to spend money on the fields, . not on the building. They are not going to pay for the building or the Skate Park. They will pay for irrigating the fields and what involves soccer. He thinks this is what the board would want him to tell the Park Commission. Soccer will not use the building. The games are an hour and then they are out of there. The City can view soccer as potential customers but not as a funding source. Mr. Keeler asked if the soccer organization would be willing to work the concession stand a number of night/games for part of the user fees to raise money. Mr. Lieffers stated that they would not, that it would be easier to just give the money. In further discussion it was explained that the Park Foundation is a fundraising group. Commissioner Puzak explained that the sports organizations are the key partners and customers and they should be represented on the Park Foundation. Mr. Lieffers commented that Tonka United should have said that they want someone that can be active in fundraising. .. .. Park Commission September 28, 1999 Page 5 Commissioner Themig mentioned that he did not know the history of how the Park Foundation originally developed. Was it the Park Commission's initiative or group of residences? Mr. Lindstrom explained that Shorewood did not have enough money to improve the park facilities and the idea was to get people involved in using the facilities such as organized sports and other organizations. Mr. Lindstorm also mentioned that for user fees you could have parking meters or a season pass, but feels that neither one of these are very convenient at Freeman Park. He stated that baseball generates a lot of revenue from their concession stand. Commissioner Arnst questioned if there was reluctance to participate in the fundraising. The consensus was no. Mr. Keeler asked to sort out what the Park Commission wants the Park Foundation to do. He doesn't feel the Park Foundation should be asking for user fees. It was confirmed that the Park Commission is not asking for that. . Commissioner Puzak summarized that the Park Commission does not want the Park Foundation to help in the user fees. The Park Commission will do that. What the Park Commission is trying to focus the Park Foundation on is: 1. Are you aware of your role? 2. Asking for help on the two projects (multi-purpose building and the Skate Park). The Park Commission needs money for these two projects. . The question was asked again, is the Park Foundation interested in raising money? Consensus is yes that this is part of the Park Foundations purpose. If the members of the Park Foundation are not willing to be involved then they should step down and appoint someone else. It was suggested that maybe the Park Foundation should invite a professional fundraiser to show how to go about fundraising. Mr. Keeler said he is willing to knock on doors and go places if there is an organizer who can lay everything out and the Foundation knows what they are doing. He also mentioned that he would be willing to work on grants if there was someone who knew how to write grants. It was asked if City staff could help with the two items that Mr. Keeler asked for; grant writing and putting together a pamphlet. Staff could help in these two areas. In further reviewing the "Options for Financing" it was determined that number 8 "grants", and number 9 "private donations" is part of the Park Foundation. Number 10 "Corporate Sponsorship" could also be part of the Park Foundation. Number 14 "Lawful Gaming" the Legion donates to the CitylPark Foundation. The Legion and Tonka Men's Club are both strong advocates for youth and children projects. It was asked what the status of number 11 "General City Funds" was and also the background of the referendum in 1992. It was explained that the referendum was for a warming house at Cathcart, and for projects at Badger, Freeman and Silverwood Parks. . Park Commission September 28, 1999 Page 6 The total for the projects was around $900,000. Around 70% of the Shorewood residents were against the referendum. There was a very small voter turn out. In the end the projects were completed but it took a little longer without the referendum. It was determined that the information acquired tonight needs to be brought back to a Park Foundation meeting and reviewed. Commissioner Puzak will get a copy of the skate park plan/brochure to Mr. Kelly. The Park Foundation. will meet Thursday, October 14,1999. The Park Foundation will meet the second Thursday of each month while they get things going. Dave McNally was mentioned that he would be a good motivator and that the Park Foundation may want to invite him to one of their meetings. Mr. Lieffers commented his general observation tonight is that there is zero dollars in the fundraising. If the Park Commission has to count on the Park Foundation for dollars he didn't hear any commitment for dollars. Mr. Kelly stated that the objective wasn't looking for a commitment in dollars. . Mr. Lieffers thought that Tonka United Soccer would not use the multi-purpose building during the tournaments, and that softball might rentthe building. Mr. Kelly said it could be possible the City wouldn't allow beverages in the park except at the concession stand. Mr. Lindstrom stated that there are a lot of non-residents at the Shorewood Parks and to ask the Shorewood taxpayers to pay for all the improvements when there are so many non-Shorewood residents using the parks is not fair. This is one of the reasons for the Park Foundation to generate some revenue. Mr. Lieffers asked if user fees are a Park Commission issue. Commissioner Puzak explained that user fees are on going and the projects that the Park Commission is asking . for help isa capital improvement. Mr. Keeler commented that the zero amount is wrong. He did not say he would donate money but he will help raise money. The meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Twila Grout Recording Secretary CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood · cityhall@shorewood.state.net 1\1EMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James C. Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works . DATE: . October 9, 1999 RE: Discussion of Trail Costs At the previous City Council meeting, Staff was directed to address the following issues: . Cost alternatives for various widths of trail segments . Life span cost differentials between concrete versus .bituminous . Uses and durability between materials . Background of the placement of the concrete walk along Old Market Road . WSB and Associates has prepared cost estimates for the various trail segments that are currently in design. As discussed at that time, there are many variables that enter the equation regarding cost for a trail project. It can not be overstated that costs can vary widely depending on the following constraints: . Traffic volume and speed o~ the adjacent roadway of the trail being constructed. . Are retaining walls required on the project? . Will the traiVwalk be constructed adjacent to a wetland or poor soils area? . What are the constraints regarding trees, tree fencing, or other vegetation? . Is there an area that can be used as a stockpile for equipment, supplies, and construction materials? . What is the topography of the site? . How many driveways are impacted? . How many of the driveways are concrete? Estimated Costs: To be able to address the concerns that were raised at the last City Council meeting, it was decided to set aside what has already been estimated on the current projects, due to the vast differences of each trail segment.. Instead, Staff has prepared "generic" estimates of a typical trail along an urban roadway for ft ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Se. Mayor and City Council Discussion of Trail Costs October 9, 1999 Page 2 of 4- reference. As stated above, costs on individual projects will vary depending upon the above listed constraints for each project. Having stated that, Attachments one through three are "generic" cost estimates for installation of various . types of widths of trails or sidewalk along an urban roadway. For the sake of discussion, most of the construction items were held constant to aid in being able to draw a comparison between the materials and widths. An assumed distance has been selected at 2,000 linear feet of trail. Although not the standard format for estimating or construction, costs have been summarized on a price per lineal foot (regardless of width) to aid in relating the costs to a real world picture. Table 1 summarizes the findings: . Description of Path/W aIk Bituminous Bituminous Concrete Width of Surface (Feet) 8.0 6.0 5.0 Overall Project Cost Cost Per Lineal Foot $ 132,298.94 $ 120,659.19 $ 159,366.31 $ 66.15 $ 60.33 $ 79.68 Table 1 At the last meeting, residents along Vinehill Road objected to an 8.0-foot wide path, due to perceived impact of an 8.O-foot wide surface. Residents requested consideration be given to a 4.0 foot walk versus the 8.0 foot path. Due to the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) regulations, the minimum surface a municipality can construct is a 5.0-foot wide. As such, most of the contractors have also changed their forms and equipment to meet this mandatory standard. . From Table 1, the cost difference between an 8.0-foot bituminous trail versus a 5.0 concrete walk is estimated at $13.53 per lineal foot. Life Soan Costs of Materials It is expected that the life of a trail is approximately 20 years with maintenance. People have tried to utilize the same logic used in roadway design regarding "concrete versus bituminous" to trail projects. Unfortunately, the relationship between trail design and roadway design does not correlate, in this instance. In roadway design, it is expected that a concrete roadway (rigid pavement) will have an anticipated service life of approximately 30 years. A bituminous roadway (flexible pavement) is expected to have a design life of approximately 20 years. (Yes, I know that most of the roadways in Shorewood have exceeded this life span. So be it!). One of the major factors involved in determining the material to be Mayor and City Council Discussion of Trail Costs October 9, 1999 Page 3 of 4 used is !l!!1. the desired period to replacement, but the volume of traffic, and in particular, the amount of heavy truck traffic that is forecasted to be on that particular roadway. The life span of a trail remains fairly constant in Minnesota, due to frost conditions. Steps can be taken to minimize frost heave, such as excavating deeper and replacing in place soils with non-frost susceptible soils such as sand. However, the deeper the excavation, the more costs escalate. Engineers try to balance out the cost of trucking in new soil, versus maintenance costs. In reality, both concrete and bituminous for trails will achieve a very similar life span. . Maintenance costs of concrete versus bituminous trail are probably very similar. While trails need to be sealcoated approximately once every 10 years, concrete walks need to be crack sealed and patched on an annual basis due to the way that concrete fails over time. This will be explained further in the memorandum. Uses and Durabilitv Between Materials A fair number of municipalities have changed from installing concrete walks to bituminous trails for the following reasons: . . Similar service life.between the materials . Joints in concrete pavement detract from inline skating, skateboarding . Cost difference between materials . Liability concerns due to the different ways that failure occurs between material types (see next section) . Bituminous, or flexible pavement, tends to flex with the underlying soft spots that may occur, due to moisture entering cracks in the pavement or by seeping under the pavement structure. A noticeable depression will occur over time, providing early warning sign of ultimate failure. During this time, the bituminous pavement may crack or become "alligatored." However, the pavement typically remains in place. This provides maintenance crews an opportunity to patch depressions before a serious trip hazard occurs. Due to the strength of concrete, the surface tends to "bridge" across soft spots until the soft spot becomes too large for the bridge to span. At that point; the bridge breaks and falls into the depression. Because the failure happens rather quickly, a trip hazard can occur before maintenance crews have been afforded the opportunity to prevent the situation. This has prompted the majority of municipalities who have concrete walk. to institute an annual or bi-annual sidewalk inspection program, due to the liability attached to such trip hazards. Mayor and City Council Discussion of Trail Costs October 9, 1999 Page 4 of 4 Back2round of Old Market Road Concrete Walk The question was also raised with regard to the origin and funding mechanism for placement of the concrete walk along Old Market Road. This concrete walk was constructed as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) project. At that time, the State of Minnesota would only pay for a concrete walk, and not bituminous. State dollars were utilized to construct this walkway. As of approximately four years ago, MSA since repealed the requirement that only concrete walks would . be funded. The State will now fund both concrete and bituminous surfaces adjacent a roadway. Width of Surfaces At the last meeting Staff reported that an 8.0-foot wide trail is the standard that is promoted in most areas. While this standard remains. several contractors have indicated that it is still possible to obtain equipment that will pave a 6.0 wide path. Many Cities have remained with the 8.0-foot width due to the number of complaints on 5 and 6-foot walkways of speeding bicyclists or rollerbladers whirring by pedestrians ata close distance. It is perceived that the added width provides pedestrians and bicyclists and inline skaters an added level of comfort. For your reference it is to be noted that MSA utilizes an 8.0-foot minimum width, with the Federal Standards requiring a O.O-foot width minimum. . City of Shorewood Estimated General Construction Costs for Trails Width of TraillWalk: Material: Length of Trail: 6.0 Feet Bituminous 2,000 Feet Attachment 1 City of Shorewood Estimated General Construction Costs for Trails Width ofTrailIWalk: Material: Length of Trail: 8.0 Feet Bituminous 2,000 Feet 1 Mobilization $ 900.00 1 $ 900.00 2 Common Excavation $ 4.00 3,556 $ 14,222.22 3 Sawcut Bituminous Drivewa Pavement $ 2.00 240 $ 480.00 4 Sawcut Concrete Driveway Pavement $ 4.25 160 $ 680.00 5 Remove Driveway Pavement $ 5.00 800 $ 4,000.00 6 Sub ade Pre aration $ 1.25 1,778 $ 2,222.22 7 CI 5 A gre ate Base Placed $ 12.50 2,042 $ 25,530.00 . 8 Bituminous Material Path $ 29.50 336 $ 9,912.00 9 Bituminous Material Restore Driveways $ 32.00 110 $ 3,532.80 10 Concrete Driveway Pavement $ 4.00 2,880 $ 11,520.00 11 Concrete Walk $ 3.80 $ 12 Relocate Mailbox $ 150.00 20 $ 3,000.00 13 Concrete Pedestrian Ram $ 350.00 6 $ 2,100.00 14 Traffic Control $ 1,200.00 1 $ 1,200.00 15 Bale-Check $ 10.00 50 $ 500.00 16 Silt Fence e Heavy Duty $ 3.50 1,200 $ 4,200.00 17 Soddin Lawn & Boulevard $ 2.25 3,333 $ 7,500.00 18 Seedin and Mulchin $ 1,500.00 0.5 $ 750.00 19 Wood Fiber Blanket $ 2.50 300 $ 750.00 20 Clearin and Grubbin $ 1,500.00 1 $ 1,500.00 . Subtotal $ 94,499 .24 Contingencies 10% $ 9,449.92 . Design, Constffesting $ 28,349.77 Grand Total $ 132,298.94 Cost per Lineal Foot of Trail $ 66.15 Attachment 2 . City of Shorewood Estimated General Construction Costs for Trails Width of TraillW alk: Material: Length of Trail: 5.0 Feet Concrete 2,000 Feet Attachment 3 ~ L LHe~ LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 4071 SUNSET DRIVE · P.O. BOX 385 · SPRING PARK. MN 55384-0385 · 612. 471-7125 · FAX 612. 471-9151 DEEPHAVEN EXCELSIOR GREENWOOD _EPENDENCE LONG LAKE MEDINA MINNETONKA SEACH MINNETRISTA ORONO eSONIFACIUS SHOREWOOD SPRING PARK TONKA SAY VICTORIA WOODLAND September 23, 1999 Mayor Love and City Council Members City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood,~ 55331 ~ ~ (C' r;= ~ n r' r.== !,""",; I C' (,"1'-- l' \'" ,'= ,,,,,' O .~r'~ . "Ii 1\'\, --. ': , I <,. "E-O 2' '" .......-,....U1 i)l: . " r - )' ~~~..:; : ; v . -"vvv , t L..I! I f By I Dear Mayor Love and Council Members: The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) passed the enclosed budget for 2000, at its last full LMCC meeting on August 17, 1999. I have scheduled a time on your October council agenda to spend a few minutes giving an update on Commission activity and seeking city council support for the next year's budget. This budget is not funded with tax dollars, but rather a cable company franchise fee paid annually to the LMCC. As of this year we are also receiving a PEG (public, educational, governmental) access fee for community use of the production studio. I look forward to appearing before you and answering any questions you may have regarding the budget and allocation of the funding. Sincerely, LAKE MlNNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION M rf~~ Sally Koenecke . Administrator Enclosure 44=7Pr , .1. LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Capital Improvement Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Ending Cash Balance 1999 Revised 2000 Proposed Revenues 36210 Interest 39203 Transfers from Other Funds $500 $27,000 $10,000 Total Revenues $27,000 110.500 . Ex:penditures and Other Fmancin~ Uses Ex:penditures 530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs. 580 Other Eq uipment $27,000 ? ? Total Expenditures $27.000 $0 Beginning Cash Balance $0 $30,000 * . Increase (Decrease) to Cash $0 $10,500 Ending Cash Balance $0 $40,500 * This amount is part of the one-time transfer of fund balance from Franchise Administration in year 2000. LAKBMINNBTONICA OOMMUNICATIONS COIISSION . f) Sl REVENUES If) 1- lSl Administration Studio/Aooess Capital Outlay a.. J) 1999 1999 .2000 2000 2000 ..J <I :\I Budget Additions Revised Pro,posed Proposed Proposed l- n 0 Sl l- V "'- i;t Franchise Fees $160,000 S9.S6S $169,S6S $192,000 . PEO Fees $52,200 $52.200 $53,000 Mound PEG Fees $6,625 $27,000 ::J Cbanltassen Pees SO - Studio RentaVDubbIng Fees $250 $250 $500 Interest $4,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $500 Insurance kefud 5607 $607 Triax FraQCbise Fee SetUement $15,000 $lS;OO(l Triax Moving Settlement $15,000 $15,000 J 5 Landlord Coatribution 510,000 $10,000 ~ Transfer From Othot Fund $75,000 $10,000 .L l 1999 FUD. Foos $192,000 $192.000 (p.id Quarterly in 1999) .. V') Sl " Total RClYeaDell $216.200 $24Zft4Z2 $46S.247 $195.000 S158,SOO JIO.SOO " " n -l ~ I J) Sl IAKB MINNHI'ONKA OOMMUNICAnONS c:x>MMISSION /"1 lSl a.. Budget Summary And Resulting Cash Balance Additions Franchise Administration 2000 prqposed StlldiolAocess Capn&1 Produclioo Improvement Fund 2000 2000 fJQ,PDSOd Prop0ae4 ID N .-i lSl "" ['- "" 1999 Budllet 1999 ~ Tola! ReveDuef $216.200 '142.422 '46S.247 a~.(XX) ~lS8.s00 m.m Operatin, ExpcDSD $178,600 S.~6,132 $214.731 $102.:725 $148.25S 0 Olpital Outlay $37.600 $63.900 $I01.soo $130,000 $tJ 'I I- Transfers Out $1S.000 $10,00D (fransre.r to Other) Total &pendilurcs $216.200 SUXl.032 J.'U6.23Z S307.72S S'Sfl.2iS m Beginning Cash Balance $104,031 $104,031 $2S3.047 $100,000 $30,000 Inc:uase (Dec:1UIIe) to Cam $0 $149.m6 ($112,715) $243 $10.500 Badial Cub Balasco $104.0]1 $253.047 $140.)22 $loo,,24S $40.sD0 1 Total 2000 Ending Cash Ba1a.nces $281,(l611 u U I: ..J Leasehold improvcmcnb(remodelillg, moving. ote.) for 1999 are. shown in Capital Outlay of $101.soo in the Re~ 1999 Budget. ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .-i I ~ I (J) lSl The transfer of $75.000 from Franchise Administration to ACCCIS Studio Produt.1iol'l J'CpNSen1s an annuw allocation offr8l'lwise fees to Public Access. .. lbe year 2(XX) Franobise Administration Plmd shows a capital outlay e:xpendhure of$l30,ooo. This is a On&~-time transfer of fund \)a!anoe to establish begining fund btlanooa of $100.000 for the AoDe&:s S1udio .Production FUnd and $30.000 for tho Capital Jnaprovemeat FuBd. WJ1bO\lt tbcee tnlI1Sfol8.of funds, the catb flow for this ftmd WOI11d be a positive S19,82S. The Capital lmprovement Fund does not sbow any spending 8et1:W1Y pendina staffrcque;sts. t. . . .' 09 27 1999 03:07PM FROM LMCC TO 4740128 P.02 .- "" Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Pranehi8eA_...vacioD. BxpePss ad Other 2000 Pinaaciq U.. 1999 ComaUtee Revisecl Proposal Personal ~ 101 Salaried Pull-time $47.080 $43.000 10Z ~ 0wt1iZDe SO SO 103 Salaried Part-tUne SS6 sum 121 Pen Coot. $5.852 $2.130 122 FICA Coot. $0 ~100 123 MediCare Coat. SO ~ 131 Health JmQrance $2,200 $:3.000 1S1 WO!brs Comp IDs. SO ~ Total PersoJ:W Services "',688 159.55$ ~Ues 200 Office SQpp&es $0 $1,2(lO . 220 Repair &. Maiot. Supplie$ W42 $ygQ -1'otaJ :suppI:leS . ~ ~ Pmfesskmat ~ 301 Avdit Fees S1.0s0 S1,2SO 304 Lepl Fees $USO $3.900 314 Payton Services $0 $4SO :U8 JlIDitorial Sorvice$ so. $900 319 Security Sen:ices $321 ~ Total PtofCS$ional Serviees $7~1 ~ Odm" ~ and 0JamC$ 321 TelephQPe/CQalmuoicatiODS $1,560 $1.800 32Z~ . $1.000 $1.000 331 Trawl Sdtool &: CoDf'em1ce fT. T1D $6.000 m Mileage SO $1.800 3SO P.riI1tiag and Pu'bJisbing $1.669 $1.700 . 360 lDsaIrane$ $2,950 S2.SOO 380 l1ti1ities $1,566 $2,000 384 RefUse & R~g CollectioD .$0 S120 404 MaiDt. Repair Equip. SO $3.000 412 DaiJdiDg Reat $9,000 $9.000 433 Dues &. SIlblmptioDs $900 $3,000 438 Plopert)'TaBS $1.222 $1.300 439 ContiDgalcY 1m ~ .1~ 0Uler uauges mal ~ Tote! &peDdiUll'eS ~ IF- '72! Q1:ber fip.meinir Uses Tra1:wlOJS to Other Pun<Is 720 M:leSt Studio 0perati0Ds $66.000 'S1~f#J 'lotIJ. utber 14iaaucms uses ~ $'lS.OOO Total AdmiDisUatiDD $~.z!6 V77.'12S kl'::h::t(-l':l':l':l W:('~'ClI-'M I-t-1UM LMCC IU 4'(4ldl:c!Cl l-',kl4 . ~ . Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission ~ StudiQ Productiou F.:lpeases aDd Oth01' 2000 F'meociDg UBeS 1999 Commitee Revised Proposal PersoI1at ~ 101 Sa1a:ricd Pull-time $38,520 mooo 102 Salaried Qwrtime $0 SO 103 Salaried part-time $299 $17.000 121 Pcra Coat. $4,788 $1.110 122 PICA Cont. SO S3.1oo 123 Medicate Cent. SO S'T.Z5 131 Hca1th~ $1,800 $3.000 151 Workezs camp b. JQ IS. Total Pessooal Serviees ~ ~ S~lies 200 Office SoppIios $2,.240 51,200 220 Repair'&: MaiDt. Supplies . 12 ~ Total ::iopp11eS ~ n.g . ~s1 Services 301 Auditiog ~ S1.0s0 Sl.2S0 304 Legal Fees S3~ $2,1(10 311 ACCCS$ComraotoIs $11,.400 $12,SOO 314 payton Scmces $0 S4SO ,318 .Janitorial Services $0 $900 319 Security S<<vic:es $0 S300 Total Profc$siO.Qal Services ~ ~ Other Services and 01~ 321 TelephoaelCommuDic:atioDS Sl,S61) $1.800 322 Postage $1..000 $1,000 331 Travel Schco1 & Confet=al S1,.4llJ S1.5'OO 332 :Mileage $600 $600 350 PriDtiDg and PubUsbing $5,006 $5,300 360 Insunmc:e $2.,9SO $2,.SOO 380 Utilities $4.266 $4.000 384 Refuse & ~ C01lectioD SO ~. . 404 Mamt. Repair Equip. $20.100 S20.700 412 Building ROIlt $2'7.000 srT.fXXJ 433 Dues It 5ul1llCl'iptiol:ls $600 S<<O 438PropertyTmtes $3.666 $3,700 439 CoDtirlgeocy ssm 1m 'l"otal utI1f1t Ularges ~ ~ ToWl E'xpcnditore. ~s ~l48.2SS OthcrF"~U_ Tr.msfcr:s to Other F\u1ds 720 .A=calStIldio Capite! Fund $27.000 $10.000 Total Utber l'JDaDc::mg U&cs uum ~ Total ~tudio 1~S15 SlS8.2SS HENNEPIN PARKS REGIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM LRT REGIONAL TRAIL CORRIDOR 1999-2000 WINTER USE PERMIT Name of City Shorewood City Hall Phone 612-474-3236 Contact Person James C. Hurm Phone 612-474-3236 Authorized 1999-2000 Winter Activities hiking, biking, snow shoeing, cross country skiing, pet walking and snowmobiling. Authorization is hereby requested from the Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners to use portions of the LRT Regional Trail Corridor for winter use activities between November 15 and March 31 as determined by each municipality within guidelines set forth herein on property located within individual City boundaries. It is understood and agreed that approval from the Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners is contingent upon the following conditions: . . The City will prbvide the Park District with a Certificate of Insurance, naming Hennepin Parks. as an additional named insured. Such certificate shall provide at least $600,000 aggregate or combined single limit of general liability coverage for the requested winter use activities. . The City agrees to maintain the trail, including, but not limited to, any plowing, sweeping, sanding, packing, trash pick-up, and sign replacement, between November IS-March 31 pursuant to guidelines established by the Park District. The City further agrees to immediately address all safety issues on or adjacent to trails. . The City will provide signage at locations approved by the Park District notifying the public of authorized winter activities within its city limits; activities may include hiking, biking, snowmobiling, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, or pet walking. (Horses are prohibited on all segments of the trail throughout the year.) Winter use signs must be installed by the City at designated locations prior to November 15 and removed by the City no later than April 15. These signs are totally the responsibility of each municipality. . The City agrees to enforce rules and regulations established by the municipality as part of its request for a Winter Use Permit. e. The City agrees to repair all trail surface damage that occurs as a result of winter trail activities and/or maintenance, including, but not limited to, grading or adding aggregate pursuant to guidelines established by the Park District. . The City agrees that winter trail use will be available to all persons, regardless of residence. Each City is required to submit its annual permit, requests, including proposed rules and regulations, by September 15, after which the Park District may take up to 45 business days to process. Each pennit request must be submitted as a result of formal City Council action, with accompanying verification, agreeing to the terms and conditions outlined by the Park District's Winter Use Permit. It should be further understood that no winter activity will be allowed on segments of the tRT Regional Trail Corridor where municipalities do not request and receive permits. The Park District reserves the right to terminate a permit at any time, if the conditions set forth herein are not followed. . Signed: Date: Title: City Administrator (Authorized Representative of the City) ohlllrt/wnt *7.B ,( CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99-001 A RESOLUTION i\tIAKING APPOINTl\iIENTS TO CERTAIN OFFICES AL'ID POSITIONS W IT.Hli'l THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD FOR THE YEAR 1999 WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the Shorewood City Council to make annual appointments to fill certain offices and positions within the City government at the beginning of each year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the following persons are appointed to the following offices and positions until the 1999 City Council organizational meeting: Acting Mayor: CounciImember Kristi Stover Council Representatives to: a. Park Commission Liaison: Scott Zerby. b. Planning Commission Liaison: Christine Lizee c. Liquor Stores: John Garfunkel & Scott Zerby d. IVfinnehaha Creek Watershed District: Christine Lizee e. Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission: John Garfunkel f. Association of Metro Municipalities: Woody Love g. Coordinating Committee South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Woody Love h. Backup to Mayor on Coordinating Committee South Lake IVfinnetonka Public Safety Department: John Garfunkel I. Backup to Mayor on Excelsior FIre Department Special Review Committee: John GaIfunkel . e Representatives to A ffiliated Organizations: a. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District: Robert Rascop (Council appointed thru October 27, 1999) b. Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission: c. Minnetonka Commnnity Services: Tad Shaw City Attorney: TIm Keane, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren. Lrd. City Prosecutor: Ken Potts Emergency Preparedness Director: SLMPSD Police Chief Bryan Litsey 4I=7C-. i~ ~ (C ~ r \\P ~ r. n\\ , Ii. II . i~ SEP 281599 ~i i I CITY of ORdNo I \, Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Municipal Offices MallloK Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 September 23, 1999 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Members c/o.Gregory S. Nybeck, Executive Director 18338 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, l\t1N 55391 . Dear Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Members: This letter is in response to a letter received from Greg Nybeck, LMCD Executive Director, regarding the appointment of the City's LMCD representative. The letter indicates the LMCD appointments are made in October, and the appointment is for a three-year term. It.is the City's understanding that the LMCD enabling legislation was changed several years ago to provide that appointments are for one year rather than three years. Also, Orono, as well as most or all other cities, makes its annual appointments at the first of the year. The October appointment date does not coincide with any other appointment. process or schedule. It would be helpful if the LMCD would coordinate its appointment schedule with the annual appointment schedule generally used by the member cities. Ronald 1. Moorse City Administrator RJM/lsv . cc: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Member Cities Telephone (612) 249-4600 · Fax (612) 249-4616 .-"'" BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Bert Foster Vice Chair, Deephaven Eugene Partyka Secretary, Minnetrista Craig Nelson Treasurer, Spring Park Andrea Ahrens Mound Bob Ambrose Wayzata Kent Dahlen Minnetonka Beach .craig Eggers Victoria om Gilman Excelsior Greg Kitchak Minnetonka un McMillan Orono Robert Rascop Shorewood Herb J. Suerth Woodland Sheldon Wert Greenwood . o SO% Recycled Content 20% Post Consumer Waste LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD. . DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA 55391 . TELEPHONE 612/745-0789 . FAX 612/745.9085 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR August 13, 1999 COUICIL CORRESPOIDEIICE DIIE lf~/9( Mr. James Hurm City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear James: Our records indicate the three year term for Bob Rascop on the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors expires this year. It has been a customary appointment procedure for new terms to be effective with the second Board meeting in October (10/27/99). Your city council is encouraged to coordinate your board member's reappointment effective with this Board meeting. Please advise our office if your records are not in agreement with ours. Your prompt attention in processing this important appointment is appreciated. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 4i~ Gregory ( Nybeck .~. - re f?;) ~ p ~V7 ~ fi:U" \O~~~G~~ 1999~\I. [1.. : ..~; \ .. l ; By -= Web Page Address: http://www.winternet.comI-lmcdl E-mail Address:lmcd@wintemet.com I I ~ Ii "'.. ... :8- 81 ~ !I. . ~~(a'" .... I!::i::s. ..e'~l -loa- CS) I i _.0 a B. .. Ii- .. I ~ .. tIl'< CS) P. ....0 ;l::i 1:1.... .. W a.G. ~ .... -.-- .1:1- ...- -- ~ E: e....-. .- tt tt C" III a.. 1Il:...rt_Q1 I .......ettt. ...rta. a~ rtw ".ft ....N ... "1""1i- t"a.gl=i: p.r.,.~ ... ~ o ...&....- ~- ...... fi.3- 11"- ... ::10- .- .... .. D 10 "I-rt 0 I....: rtl:l . o "" irt' o rt..A. et"'iD 'U o~ I i 10 I i ... 1Set' ..rt ,rt.... ... rt rt.,..rto.rt ....:e..... 1= .~. r.l. 10 ..."'~ 0 1:1110 o ....a 0 co --< ..:r D 0 0 ...0 . ..- ~I.. ItO . n.... . . .....n . rrtlSlOW 0.. I\) ... l:i . ~ _ .0_" .:Z n .. ..... .11' Wit la :r. ..... ::.tii".g." rt ~ .... ~ I ....1. ....;. ,"D' =~. R.i - t'< 11'. · ......ol' .. .. itol rtrt...IS.. '<~Jo (H . .., .-t, tttt. w.... p.:rt o ."1 .1! ;E:Hl ......~. I'd IS ( I\l 'J g iJ:;l~ :rid. -.. . " I!ll ~ I: ... ..... .. .. tot 0.. . - It.... - .0. . rt... ;;0- o '<... .. !& .....rtal o 1:1 ~. J 'C...o ~ ! I .. · tift ="'~ tt..... :3 II" rt &1:1 rtD..... .:rw rt tIl...-= .... . 0"" ".. . II; ... 11'< .,.lQ . 0 . Hll!:.~ II" .., .etl .. it". rt o trt P- o .fi"O- 0 o .. · J:~ rt · ~ i =- . m ~ ...'!.!; I'~ ...l Illf 12 "C_ '<". ." ..n.. - ~ If.l!.;1' "'1)1' IS. 1:1' ",I' ....rt.~. lUi l:r'" "allot e I\l ~I. ::~ ..... I KO. I..... o. Iii :'ii 1: 0........ . 01W HII ... .... f:t .eo I ......~iao l=1 GI!{ IC tl~l! .11' "'1:1 III .:;;a ='1 U ....1 0- ....J ..... 0 to ~~ :s 0"_ ~ ~=::IO~ J 1= :ur lQ i. " g. D-~o-",o. Ie. ... CS) . .... . ...... ......o.......rt I ... m .I .. ttl tt g.rt I.~ ... . _ rt ...." . 'I :i S'i ~...I~.. . . (H ;''d 0 ~ .a 'Ie -.. 1:1= 0 or; .. :s 1:1' (... ~ g. -,I I Ult I\l .. n. 0 0 1= GO - ie.=13 0...0 .... ... .. ... .. . "' .~ ~ t.;g-j..o 1:.1 ..... ~ I i~1I " " I Iff '1 ~o ;tl .. "c ..~ t . .. ft 0" .v..... 11' gg ttl 'd. .a ...=1 . . ~p. 0 "O"lo .11'1 .. · lid .a-I..II I ".11''' .. . ;ill . 1:1 0" 0 . I!." . . .... ......... C'I' p." e....o I't o 1'1 " C:;"' . G.. f - ill !~... r ..... t:r I:- ... ...... . 11'....i "' .0", .:- i la..u ow ....o...~... '<.... ....."'......... ct 0""- . :r .. ~:I r.... ....rtl! I 'It li~~ It:ul!1 ll~ II. I::; t~ I 0" . . ....Ittl ... a.... I I". ... a. !og. If .... . 'It .;'::Ia ct.,.. iit1 :. 11''' · ..... "'Ii- ..c i1 . . 'III "' "'< rt r .... .. rt "'B.~. ... .. ~ ~lo . . ~ ~'< 3", = ... i o . ~ "'''11 Or'" 1Q "' IIIrt 8:'- ...1'1....... ... ~:irb ., ... ct n 0 " · J!- . I.... 1 '='Bo~a UIIrt 1:1 .. HI g. . tt o . .~I I' ..w ~ ... ::'0 U' O[ IS .. OCll ~o r.u.~ .. rt . . -"f!. .a... . . . .....g. II - .. IG 0.. . 0 ."ao ilBg w: ri- .ri-... f:rt. II! f!. et. ..::I... o. rB. 0 I:l;"to.a, s: g..a ~ HI · · f. · g. G ..1:1 . c; . 1.1:-0 1:& Ii "..rr... ~te It'll. . "ClI .. i It . If- o "<.M :1 .. o. .".Hllt'rt ... .. .... III tt n Octrt .. n rt"'. ". -'< :sa . "', .. f!..... . 0 .... i lSo:rct"rt r ....::1 rt'" IQ l- . - ... rr ...'" ... II' Ips I "'g- It ~... .. aD .. I =-...1 '< . .. ... Oft . . .... . ..... :: . 0 - f1" . ... - HI ~ V go... . . . tIlII .. . "E i t _ "'D S! CS) .... ~ . . )c - ..... . . 4t Press Release for Immediate publication Shorewood Seeks Volunteer Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative The term of the City of Shorewood's representative to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) has expired. The LMCD is a public agency responsible for governing balanced use of Lake Minnetonka while protecting the aquatic environment. Representatives are appointed by their City Council for three year terms, and are commissioned to study lake issues, review license applications, -and boat operations on Lake Minnetonka. Members are excepted to attend two or more meetings a month and keep the City Council informed. If you are interested in serving the City in this capacity, please send a letter of interest along with your resume to: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331. The deadline for submittal is Wednesday, February 19 at 5:00 p.m. The Shorewood City Council will then interview interested persons. Contact James C. Hurm, City of Shorewood 474-3236 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 350 WmCH EXTENDED A MORATORIUM REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELDERLY HOUSING PROJECTS BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DIRECTING A STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED THEREON THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD DOES ORDAIN: Ordinance No. 350 is hereby amended by amending Section 5 thereof to read as follows: Sec. 5. Duration: This ordinance shall remain in effect until December 31, 1999 or until appropriate amendments to the City's official controls and Comprehensive Plan have been adopted and are effective, whichever occurs first. This ordinance shall not apply to applications submitted pursuant to Section 1201.03, Subd. 20 of the City Code after the effective date of Ordinance No. 326. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 1999. day of ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR #7[) CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.net/shorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor ahd City Council James C. Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works J1 . DATE: October 6, 1999 RE: A Motion to Approve a Street Light Request at the Intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street (County Road 82) Attachment 1 is a petition received from the neighborhood along HilIendale Road, requesting the installation of a street light at the intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street. Attachment 2 is the location map showing the neighborhood and proposed light location. Residents within a 500 foot radius have been notified of the petition and public information meeting. The City of Shorewood has the policy, that requests for streetlights will be considered after a public information meet is conducted. In addition, petitioners must be willing to pay any installation costs for the fixture. After the light has been installed, the City would accept the light and pay ongoing electrical and maintenance costs for the fixture. . In review of this issue with NSP, there is an existing power pole at the northeast quadrant of HilIendale Road and County Road 82. Since a pole and electricity is immediately available to the site, NSP is willing to install a "Cobrahead - non decorative" style light at this location, without an installation charge. Attachment 3 depicts the Cobrahead style light fixture. Where there have been concerns voiced from adjacent residents regarding side glare or the intrusion of being able to seethe light source from a distance, the City has utilized the "shoebox" style light provided by NSP (refer to Attachment 4). This style of light has been very effective in eliminating these types of complaints. Since this fixture is over and above the Cobra style light, if chosen, petitioners would be required to fund the installation at a cost of approximately $400~OO. Attachment 5 are letters received in support of the installation of the light. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER SA. rr---,.-a ~m c::::::J 0 lill!1 C\l gE}j lYW(f) rB"E G; --- . ~ ~ ~ - ,... \1' -..... J .3 ~ 1 . . . . .. '. . .~ ~ _ '.r:::' ~~ '::f: \ i ; - CSi.: \. '~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ " ~ a 1~ ~ ~ ~ tl}. L ar~ ~ I \ ..., - (\ . . iJ . ~ 1~ ~ ~~ ~ ,-,:::::: }S' , ) ~. ,") ~ ~,'h ~ ~.~- ,.~ ~\ ""-j - ::: ~ E ..::::: ~ t: ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.neVshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net . NOTICE The Shorewood City Council hereby notifies all property owners within 500 feet of the intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street (see site location map on reverse side) that the Council will consider a request for a street light at that location at their meeting on October 11, 1999 in the Council Chambers of Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road. The meeting starts at 7:00 P.M. Y ouare invited to attend this meeting to express your opinions and concerns. If you can not attend the meeting, you may respond in writing to: . Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 FAX #474-0128 e-mail: cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us If you have any questions relative to this matter, you may call City Hall at 474-3236. '0 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER HOLLY LA CIT' ~ N 500 I o 500 Feet I Attachment 2 NiP NSP Street Lighting Service Yes NSP Included for 25 yrs Customer or NSP $5.30 $1,375.00 (25 ft wood pole) Base Options Buried or Mounted Two-Fixture Cross Arm Available No 1 This rate will apply for a 100 Watt High-Pressure Sodiwn (HPS) fixture for 1he entire table. Standard Cobrahead Rate/Service Included Leased Rate Cleaning, Lamp and Ballast Replacement . Installation System Repair and Replacement The cobrahead lamp is available in different mast arm lengths with cut off or drop lens. It is available in 25-foot or taller wood, aluminum or fiberglass poles. Drop lens fixtures are available in 70, 100, 150 or 400 watt HPS. Cut off lens fixtures are available in tOO, 150,250 and 400 watt HPS at the same price. It also is available with a double mast arm. Ownership Monthly Rate Group V Rate Cleaning, Lamp and Ballast Replacement Installation System Repair and Replacement Ownership. Monthly Rate Average Installed Purchase Price This fixture is so versatile it . can be used in any area. Cobrahead Style Yes NSP Perpetually included in rate NSP $13.65 e Attacllment 3 Maximum Spacing Recommendations Cobrahead Style " WattaQe/Pole HeiQht Recreation Area of Use Residential Commercial 70W/25FT 160FT 130FT 70W/30FT 180FT 110FT 100W/25FT 180FT 160FT 100W/30FT 200FT 150FT 150W/25FT 240FT* 220FT* 150W/30FT 220FT* 200FT* 250W/25FT 250FT* 230FT* 250W/30FT 250FT* 230FT* *Use different wattage/Pole combinations or fixture types for better lighting Denotes best recommendation 90FT 80FT 130FT 120FT 180FT* 190FT* 200FT* 200FT* Maior Roadwav 60FT* 40FT 90FT 80FT 160FT 140FT 180FT* 190FT . . o Printed on recycled paper 10% post-consumer waste , NiP NSP Street Lighting Service . . . Rectalinear Light Rate/Service Included Leased Rate Cleaning, Lamp and Ballast Replacement Installation System Repair and Replacement Rectalinear Style The rectalinear light is available with the different mast arms. shown on the product sheet. as well as a drop or cutoff lens. It is available in 25-foot or taller aluminum, wood or fiber- glass poles. Lamps are 100, 150 or 250 watt high- pressure sodium (HPS). It also is available in a double mast arm. Yes NSP Perpetually included in rare NSP $17.80 Ownership Monthly Rate Group V Rate Cleaning, Lamp and Ballast Replacement Installation System Repair and Replacement Ownership . Monthly Rate Average Installed Purchase Price Yes NSP Included for 25 yrs Customer or NSP 55.30 This fixture is practical for both commercial and residential areas. $1.995.00 (25 rt aiuminum pole) Mounted Yes Base Options Two-Fixture Cross Arm Available lTh'$ ~te wMJ. ao;::ly for a 100 ~Natt Htgne?~9ssure Soan,Jr."lIHPSi .i:\~ure ror the entire tabie. ~, :..- '," FOR HJLlE.NOA\...E: . ONE.. F"1X.TU~e. O)ool\...'i }-JDN OFr.- 02A..' vE. MAST ~Q."" MOw"""\"e.t) TO exIST. WOOD 'POwER PoLE.. Attachment 4 Maximum Spacing Recommendations Rectalinear Style Area of Use WattagelPole Height Residential Commercial Major Roadway 100W/25FT 170FT 130FT 90FT 100W/30FT 190FT 120FT 80FT 150W/25FT 200FT" 190FT" 150FT . 150W/30FT 200FT 200FT 130FT 250W/25FT 225FT. 200FT" 200FT" 250W/30FT 225FT 225FT 190FT 250W/35FT 300FT" 250FT 175FT .Use different wattage/Pole combinations or fixture types for better lighting Denotes best recommendation '-- - -- . ~ . o Printed on recycled paper 10% post-consumer waste , . . October 6, 1999 Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Mn.55331 From: Richard & Diane Radde 6050 Mill Street Shorewood, Mn. 55331 To: Shorewood city Council Members, This letter to you is regarding the placement of a street light at the intersection of Hillendale Road and Mill Street. The street light that the council is considering placing at this location is long over due. We have four Son's, two of them have already finished High school, They used to wait for the bus at this location. At 6:30 in the morning it is very dark, many times the bus could not see our Son waiting for the bus, so the bus would not stop. We now have a Son that waits for the bus at this location every day. It is still a dark and dangerous location with out a light there. We are in favor of a street light at this location. The safety of our son's and all of the other young adults that wait at this location for the bus is a issue you should consider when you vote on this street light. We can not stress enough the need for a street light at this location!!!!!!! We hope that we have your support on this matter. Thank You, ~~ 'cZ-9~ Q~ dGP~// I~D f rF.: IP n \l1'i ~ ~[': Il'n OCT 7 1999 ! II , I I Attachment 5 From: mtoland@whittman-hart.com <mtoland@whittman-hart.com> To: cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us <cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us> Date: Thursday, September 30, 1999 12:46 PM Subject: Street Light _..__ ._0_0.- .... _......_._ In response to the Notice for the proposed street light at the comer of H iIIendale and Mill Street we are 100% I N FAVOR of the addition. That comer is a safety hazard without the light as traffic northbound on Mill Street is often traveling faster than the posted speed limit and unaware of that street. Additionally, that comer leaves our block vulnerable for theft as it is dark and wooded. Thank you for soliciting our thoughts. We look forward to an approved addition for Hillendale Road. Regards, Melanie McCoy (formerly Toland) 5975 Hillendale Road Shorewood, MN 55331 9/30/99 Page I of I . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhal!@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM . DATE: Mayor and City Council James C. Hunn, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Worl<s t October 8, 1999 TO: FROM: RE: Consideration of the Responses from the Eureka Road Neighborhood Regarding City Water Attachment 1- is the letter which was sent to the Eureka Road Neighborhood regarding city water. This letter was to confinn that the City had received a true representation from the first survey, as to whether the residents were opposed to the extension of watennain down Eureka Road. Of the twenty four residents along Eureka Road, four responses were received from the latest mailing. Two residents were opposed. to the extension of watennain down the roadway, one in favor of the improvement, and one "maybe dependent upon cost." . Attachment 2 is an updated tabulation, including the original survey response, and the single change from the latest mailing. From the results, there does not appear to be a majority of residents in favor of the extension of city water along Eureka Road. Attachment 3 is a brief overview of the feasibility report options and associated costs for the City Council's reference. If the City Council. approves the concept of extension of watermain through Freeman Park, Staff would bring a proposal for survey and design back to the City Council at the next council meeting for your consideration. The critical timeline for. this project is to obtain. survey infonnation of the chosen alignment before snowfall. ft ~.1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER BB. .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhal!@shorewood.state.net September 30, 1999 Dear Eureka Road Resident: The City Council has been considering which way to go to loop watermain to Smithtown Road, either down Eureka Road or though Freeman Park. The survey of Eureka Road residents taken several months ago indicated 13 of 24 households responded. Of those responding 2 were interested in municipal water, 7 were not, and 4 might be depending on costs; 11 wanted the road left as is; others were interested in alleviating drainage problems by constructing a storm sewer system. . Given these results, we would like to give you one more opportunity for input before the City Council proceedS with a decision to run water through Freeman Park. Please send to the City Council any furtherthoughts you might have on this project by October 11. Feel free to communicate in any of the following ways: Address: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 citvhalI @ci.shorewood.mn.us 474-0128 474-3236, Ext. 1 for the Shoreline . E-mail: Fax: Voice Mail: Sincerely, CITY OF SHOREWOOD Woody Love Mayor o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Attachment 1 EURE~ ROAD TABULA"jON Roadwa~ Address As Is Urban Rural Yes 5705 EurekaRd X 5910 Eureka Rd X 5885 Eureka Rd X 5820 Eureka Rd X 5740 Eureka Rd X 5815 Eureka Rd X 5760 Eureka Rd X 5780 Eureka Rd X I X 5765 Eureka Rd X 5865 Eureka Rd X X 5965 Eureka Rd X 5985 Eureka Rd X 5860 Eureka Rd X 5840 Eureka Rd 5890 Eureka Rd 5940 Eureka Rd 6140 Eureka Rd 5835 Eureka Rd 5925 Eureka Rd 5945 Eureka Rd 6025 Eureka Rd 6065 Eureka Rd 5785 Eureka Rd 5735 Eureka Rd m.l!lf4~~ ~J:i~*"~ ~~~11~1~~ ~fu~i~F, 1 ~ ~ f") :::- ! ~ .... ~ Water Trails No No Maybe $ Yes No Response X X X X X X X X X X X X X X . X X X X X X X X X X 1~~.l.~~~~~tf: i: ~ X X X X X X X X X X :~~@~~1.:m1nM wmm_ . )JE.W OR CWAW(;.E. OUE. it> \...~ST M~'L1N(. '. The following options were described: Option 1: 12 inch main on Eureka (west side) from Highway 7 to Smithtown. Includes reconstruction of street and minimal impact on trees. Poles remain as they are. Funds used: City $692,221 Option 2: Same 'route but with a "rural" section meeting Municipal State Aid (MSA) standards (24 foot surface with four foot gravel shoulders). 6 ten-foot clear zone off road's edge is required. Requires acquisition of 13.5 feet on each side for right of way. Would impact trees, shrubs, landscaping and utilities. Funds used: City $437,814 MSA $367 .499 $805,313 . Option 3: Same route but with a 26-foo wide "urban" section meeting MSA standards including concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and treatment ponds. Minimize impacts on properties by eliminating need for ditches. Funds used: City $537,471 MSA $421.416 $958,887 Option 4: 12 inch main from Smithtown Lane, along a private drive (serving 2 houses), south through Freeman Park to a connection near the Little League concession stand. Funds used: City $286,578 . Funding to be received into the waterfund from the Shorewood Ponds development equals $315,000. Attachment 3 Latest Survey Responses . . Page 1 of 1. From: J. Majestic <smajesti@isd.net> To: cityhall@ci.shorewood.mn.us <cityhall@cLshorewood.mn.us> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 19997:31 PM Subject: watermain . .- .....- ..- -_...-...- City of Shorewood, In reponse to your letter of 9/30/99, we are not interested in municipal water at this time. However, if we could get a cost estimate of using the Eureka Road watermain loop, this would aid us in our decision as to which route to take. Sincerely, John and Jill Majestic smaiesti@isd.net . . 10/6/99 .. . CITY OF SHOREWOOD '~..' iE (G If n W71~ ~ ~: OCT 61Qq~ iul: .. j . J ''';'.,,,, b',l ~y 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net September 30, 1999 Dear Eureka Road Resident: . The City Council has been considering which way to go to loop watermain to Smithtown Road, either down Eureka Road or though Freeman Park. The survey of Eureka Road residents taken several months ago indicated 13 of 24 households responded. Of those responding 2 were interested in municipal water, 7 were not, and 4 might be depending on costs; 11 wanted the road left as is; others were interested in alleviating drainage problems by constructing a storm sewer system. Given these results, we would like to give you one more opportunity for input before the City Council proceeds with a decision to run water through Freeman Park. Please send to the City Council any further thoughts you might have on this project by October 11. Feel free to communicate in any of the following ways: Address: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 cityhalI@ci.shorewood.mn.us 474-0128 474-3236, Ext. I for the Shoreline ~ )(cG' . ,~-f j) J ( t7 ~~ ~ )f' ~ JpJ' YJY ~. . E-mail: Fax: Voice Mail: Sincerely, CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~~ May;: Love I ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER '. Shoreline Message October 7, 1999 Hi my name is Ed Reitmann. I live at 5865 Eureka Road in Shorewood. I got a letter today dated September 30, 1999 from the City of Shorewood about the Freeman Park and Eureka Road loop watermain to Smithtown Road information. They make mention of a survey that was done a while back that I responded to and if this a question about do we want city water....the answer is we do. Because we obviously have well water right n"ow, but my concern is that a couple years that well may go on the fritz and then we have no water at all. So if you need any more information on this my phone number is 401-9642. But I would like to know the status of this, so if you could let me know. I think we are scheduled to . get water the year 2005. So we kind of plan on that. Let me know what the status is either way. Thank you. . Shoreline Message October 7, 1999 This is Mary Reitmann and I live on Eureka Road. I'm just responding to the survey for the water going through. We would like water to go down Eureka Road and we are interested in having it. Thank you. . . f , ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.state.neVshorewood · cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James C. Hunn, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Worl<s J.W- October 7, 1999 FROM: . DATE: RE: A Motion to Accept Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for Wetland Delineation Gideon's Glen Wetland In May of 1997, OSM and Associates prepared a draft feasibility report for the Glen Road Drainage Project. This project is located within the southwest quadrant of Glen Road and County Road 19 intersection (refer to Attachment 1). Shortly thereafter, the City postponed moving ahead with major stonnwater improvement projects, until such time as the Comprehensive Stonnwater Management Plan is prepared and approved. . At the beginning of 1999, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) made available what is known as Rule B funds to governmental agencies to complete viable stonnwater projects. These funds were collected from various agencies and developers as cash donations in lieu of ponding facilities. - . Since Rule B has been repealed, the District is making the offer to agencies on a fIrst come, fIrst serve basis. The District will provide these funds as a reimbursements to funds expended for approved projects. On August 12, 1999, Mayor Love, Council Member Lizee, City Staff, Fred Bruno - Land Conservation Committee, a representative from Hennepin County Environmental Services Division, and MCWD Staff walked the Glen Road site to discuss the potential of enhancing the existing wetland. An additional mee~g was conducted on August 26th with Mr. Eric Evenson, Director of the MCWD to determine if Rule B funds could be utilized for preliminary work on this project. It was discussed and determined that the fIrst course of action would be to perfonn a wetland delineation report. Mr. Evenson stated that the MCWD was willing to reimburse the City of Shorewood for preparation of a wetland delineation report, for an amount not to exceed $5,000.00. ft ~J PRINTEO ON RECYCLEO PAPER Sc. Mayor and City Council Gideon's Glen Wetland Delineation October 7, 1999 Page 2 of2 Attachment 2 is the proposal from the City's engineering consultant WSB and Associates, Inc. to perform the wetland delineation and survey for an amount of $4,750.00. WSB and Associates was not privy to funding limit. Staff had previously estimated that the delineation report and survey would cost approximately $5,000:00. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval of the proposal submitted by WSB and Associates, with the initial expenditure to be funded by the City's Stonnwater Management Fund. TheMCWD will reimburse the City of Shorewood for the expenditure. .,; . , . . ;::::..=.-~ ... "' -.- - V'a~'t ^ ~"-Lnca :t~.J.. 1lllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll: @ ^ 'ii)f nil .. -.0 t.....:.~:~~:~.:-;~.;;' 0001"""""; .(:. · '~;;;f:'-'-' ------- ,- - 0.:---..., ....' ~'ff.) :: ~~ I I I i ~ (P1\ , . 'f ":1 i It t~t ~ '. ; P 1,") wi ~~ ,. c:A . "',............: ;i : ! ::tl (Sl ....' ........ .,. .... rJH3i '=": .- tld . c:..:.;;;.q. f ~; :'~ ~ ~ (Ot. . (l.) It.' ...u .:._..... '~"m)-- .. ~ ~ :rL) ~ ~~ .... ~ ....!il'...~ ,.! . (OL; i' .T.....~:.:.:"f.:: :tIt ILl) ..... . 1;1 ~ ; .~ , ~f 1l I ~r.; ~ ...... ~ E .::: ~ $I ~ I N I l w r ;.IJ ~ .~I) . , 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. & Associates, Inc. 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 September 30, 1999 Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood,.MN 55331 Re: Proposed Scope of Services Wetland Delineation for Glen Road Wetland WSB Project No. 1074.25 . Dear Mr. Brown: Please find attached a proposal to complete a wetland delineation for wetland located south of Glen Road. The following tasks are proposed to be completed as part of this project: Task 1. Collect Background Information This task involves collecting all known information regarding the Glen Road wetland. Items to be collected and reviewed include recent and past aerial photographs, the County Soil Survey, the National Wetland Inventory Map, and other related mapping. Task 2. Complete Wetland Delineation This task involves the field delineation of the wetland based on the 1987 US Corps of Engineers Manual. This task involves finding the wetland edge and documenting the conditions of the upland, wetland, and edge of the wetland. Flagging will be used to mark the edge of the delineated wetland. . Task 3. Survey Wetland Edge This task involves the survey of the wetland edge by the WSB Survey Crew. The survey will be tied into the Hennepin County Coordinate System for horizontal control and established vertical control for this area. Task 4. Complete and Submit Wetland Delineation Report This task involves completing a report that is suitable to submit to all wetland regulatory agencies. This report will include a summary of the background information outlined in Task 1, a regulatory discussion, all wetland delineation forms created during Task 2, and a map of the delineated wetland. As part of this task, the wetland edge will be reviewed for approval by the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act and the US Corps of Engineers. Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Attacllment 2 " '. . . Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood, MN September 30, 1999 Page 2 The estimated fee for completing the work outlined above is $4,750 and will be billed on a cost reimbursable basis. This proposal does not include any permit application work that may be associated with any future wetland impacts. It is anticipated that this wetland will be delineated before October 15, 1999. The wetland delineation report will be completed and submitted to the City by November 30, 1999. Sincerely, Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Vice President cc: Steve Ische, WSB & Associates Andrea Moffatt, WSB & Associates Project File No. 1074.25 kd F:\ WPWIN\ I 074 .25\093099Ib. wpd , CITY OF SHOREWOOD MEMORANDUM 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128' www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net TO: Mayor and City Council James C. Hurm, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~ October 8, 1999 FROM: . DATE: RE: A Motion to Approve Proposal for Professional Engineering Services by WSB and Associates, Incl Luken Architecture for the Freeman Park Multipurpose Building. Attachment 1 is the proposal provided by WSB and Associates, Inc. and Luken Architecture for the final design and construction of the Freeman Park Multipurpose Building, and the sanitary sewer project to serve the building. Table 1 below indicates the breakdown of the proposal: Desi Costs Estimated Design Cost Of Engineerl Percent of Construction Architect fees Construction $ 48,505 $ 9,900 20.4 % $ 192,027 $ 21,500 11.2 % Pro' ect Total $ 240 32 $ 31,400 13.1 % * Estimated: Will be billed on a time and materials basis. Construction I Construction Inspection! Total Pro'eet eetion Costs Percent of Total Construction . $12,500 * 5.2 % Table 1 As a guideline, design costs for this size project typically cost fifteen percent of the total estimated cost of construction, with inspection costs typically in the five- percent range. The total proposal provided is slightly below the range that is typically seen on these types of projects. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 8d.. r Mayor and City Council Freeman Park Multipurpose Building October 8, 1999 Page 2 of 2 It should also be noted that $ 2,406.50 for design of the sanitary sewer system, and $1,970.70 for soil borings for the building design have already been expended in the design portion of the proposal. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval of the motion to accept the proposal for Professional Services as provided by WSB and Associates and Luken Architecture for the Freeman Park Multipurpose Building.' . . ... .I . WSB ~ & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 BA Mittelsteadt. P.E. Bret A. Weiss. P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Donald W. Sterna. P.E. Ronald B. Bray. P.E. 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 September 21, 1999 -'"' rc:: rF' :E n \'\ fJ ~ r-, , i,':"" I c" \' \, -, ," I! \ j. · c:.1 r. \ " 'l~"~;.~ ~~2' "c~"\ll\\ :U' Ii ~hf ~, ~""v., l~' I I .1 . I \.l . , I \ 8y I Mr. Larry Brown, P .E. City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 . Re: Proposal for Professional Services Freeman Park Multi-Purpose Building Shorewood, MN WSB Project No. 1074.37 Dear Mr. Brown: WSB & Associates, Inc., in conjunction with Luken Architecture, is pleased to submit this proposal for professional design engineering and architectural services for the design and construction of the Freeman Park Multi-Purpose Building in Shorewood. The project includes an extension of sanitary sewer line from Eureka Road to the new building site, construction of a new multi-purpose park building, park trail, and irrigation system modifications. Included in this proposal is a short description of the scope of services associated with the project, key issues that need to be addressed, and an outline of compensation for your review. I. Sanitary- Sewer Extension ............................................ 59,900.00 . It is proposed to bid the sanitary sewer extension separately from the multi-purpose building since this work involves a different type of contractor than the multi-purpose building. This task will involve field surveying, plan and specification preparation, cost estimates, meetings, and project bidding. The proposed sewer line will connect into the existing sewer line in Eureka Avenue and extend into and around the parking lots in the park to the location selected by the City. The proposed fee has incorporated the previous work performed on this project. ll. Multi-Purpose Building Design ...................................... $21,SOO~OO This task involves preparing the building design, construction, and project bidding documents. Luken Architecture prepared the preliminary building plans, and it is proposed that Luken Architecture prepare the final building design and construction documents. Enclosed is Luken Architecture's design proposal for your review in the amount of $15,525 for their services. WSB & Associates will prepare the site grading plans for the multi- Minneapolis · St. Cloud Infrastructure Engi,.eers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNIT{ EMPLOYER Attachment 1 l -,," Mr. Larry Brown, P.E. City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Shorewood, MN September 21, 1999 Page 2 purpose building, which involves site grading, bituminous trail, irrigation modifications, and sanitary sewer and watermain service connections to the building, along with coordinating with City staff on project issues. III. Construction Management/Surveying (estimated).. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . $12,500.00 It is proposed that WSB & Associates will provide the overall construction administration, surveying, and observation services on this project. Luken Architecture will work in conjunction with WSB on observation of the multi-purpose building. Construction meetings will be held on an as-needed basis during the project. We propose that the construction phase be on a cost-reimbursable basis based on WSB and Luken Architecture's current billing rates. . IV. Schedule Based on the above scope of work, the following schedule is anticipated: Order Plans and Specifications ................................ September 27, 1999 Receive Plans and Specifications/Order Advertisement For Bid ....... December 13, 1999 Receive Bids ................................................. January 12,2000 Award Contract ............................................... January 24, 2000 Begin Construction .............................................. April 15, 2000 Complete Sewer Extension ........................................ May 19,2000 Complete Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Early Fall 2000* * Dependent on material delivery . We appreciate and are excited to have this opportunity to present this proposal for engineering and architectural services for the City of Shorewood and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, 7~ Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Vice President kd F:\WPWIN\I074.37\092199-lb. wpd . . MEMORANDUM LABKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD. Attornevs ac Law 1'00 Norwest ptnandaJ Center 7900 Xeccts Avenue South llIoomington. MilU1llSOla 55431 TcJcphonc: (612) 835-3800 FAX; (612) 396-3333 TO: Jim tJU11Tl, City Administrator Tim Keane. City Attom~ October 4, 1999 FROM: DATE: RE: Smithtown Road Street/Trail Right-of-Way Research Proposal This memorandum is in response to a City Council request for a proposal for determining what easements or rights-of-way would be required in order to construct a trail along Smithtown Road. 1bis project will require an initial d.etennination ofbQw many and which parcels have dedicated a full 33 to 50 l~')ot right-of-way as part of the plattiDg process. The next step requires a parcel by parcel search of Hennepin County property records to determine which parcels have grants of easements in favor of the City of Shorewood or the public for right-of-way purposes. Legal assistant Julie Te Slaa of our office will conduct the county record search. Fimilly, the rc:sult:s or the above steps should be mapped by enbrineering to provide a quick reference resource. Armed with this infonnation. our office, in collaboration with. the office of the City Engineer, can render a determination of the magnitude of easements to be acquired to construct a trail project, together with an estimated eost of property acquisition. For ptlrposes orthis propoSe'll, T have ~egregsted the project into two segments, County Road 19 west to the LRT trail and the LRT trail west to the westerly corporate limits of the City. I bave estimated the search and work product at approximately SSO/parcel. County Road 19 to LRT Trail Est. Total #- Parcels Platted Parcels to Research Fee~ North Side 27 8 19 5900-1000 South Side 25 0 25 1200-1400 LRT Trail.to W~"t Comorate Limits cst. . rotal # Par(.."Cls Platted Parcels to Research Fcc Range North Side 40-42 13-15 25-29 1200-1500 South Side 4S 14-16 29-31 1400-1600 Total: $4700-5500 Should 'you wish 10 discuss thi~ project i.n greater detail, please contact me at.(612} 896-2303. .H= Q A 052.'\541;.01 .,.,- I ~ d rf9GL809lv 'ON/6 r: l. ~ '.LS/OZ: L r 66.7 '0 t (NOW) S9lf-969 (lt9) AlVa tMf1!OH Hr , Check Approval List for 10/11/99 Council Meeting Check # VelUler Name Descriptio" Check Date Invoice # Amount 26578 US POSTMASTER OCTOBER NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 9/28/99 092899 $647.70 TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER $647.70 26579 PERA PERA 9/29/99 762400 $1,547.35 26579 PERA PERA 9/29/99 762400 $1,687.39 TOTAL FOR PERA $3,234.74 26580 ICMA RETIREMENT TR DEFERRED COMP 9/29/99 302131 $1,571.00 TOTAL FOR ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $1,571.00 26581 CITY COUNTY CREDIT PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 9/29/99 092899 $1,252.80 TOTAL FOR CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION $1,252.80 26582 eORECOMM CELLULAR LONG DISTANCE 9/29/99 937143 $6.34 TOTAL FOR CORECOMM $6.34 26583 MN CHILD SUPPORT P CHILD SUPPORT-C. SCHMID 9/29/99 092899 $173.51 TOTAL FOR MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR $173.51 26584 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH SEC 125 REIMB 9/29/99 $269.76 26584 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH MILEAGE 9/29/99 $90.09 TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, JOSEPH $359.85 . 26585 ROLEK, ALAN MILEAGE/EXPENSES 9/29/99 $827.00 26585 ROLEK, ALAN SEe 125 REIMB 9/29/99 $125.00 TOTAL FOR ROLEK, ALAN $952.00 26586 UNITED PARCEL SERVI SHIPPING 9/29/99 $11.97 TOTAL FOR UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $11.97 26587 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING 9/29/99 5753096 $85.40 26587 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING 9/29/99 5753099 $113.30 26587 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING 9/29/99 5753096 $198.70 TOTAL FOR US WEST DEX $397.40 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 9/29/99 754987 $144.59 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 9/29/99 754988 $81.83 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 9/29/99 754988 $308.88 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 9/29/99 754986 $94.54 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 9/29/99 754986 $119.31 26588 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 9/29/99 754987 $218.18 . TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $967.33 26589 UNUM-AD&D OCT AD&D 10/1/99 $0.40 26589 UNUM-AD&D OCT AD&D 10/1/99 $0.40 26589 UNUM-AD&D OCT AD&D 10/1/99 $0040 26589 UNUM-AD&D OCT AD&D 10/1/99 $3.60 26589 UNUM-AD&D OCT AD&D 10/1/99 $11.10 TOTAL FOR UNUM-AD&D $15.90 26590 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 1011/99 $260.21 26590 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 10/1/99 $26021 26590 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 1011/99 $260.22 26590 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 10/1/99 $5,850.55 TOTAL FOR MEDICA $6,631.19 26591 UNUM LIFE INSURANC LIFE INSURANCE 1011/99 $10.60 26591 UNUM LIFE INSURANC LIFE INSURANCE 1011/99 $1.87 26591 UNUM LIFE INSURANC LIFE INSURANCE 10/1/99 $1.87 26591 UNUM LIFE INSURANC LIFE INSURANCE 10/1/99 $1.86 26591 UNUM LIFE INSURANC LIFE INSURANCE 1011/99 $57.50 TOTAL FOR UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO $73.70 Thursday, October 07, 1999 Page 1017 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 26592 AFseME eOUNCIL 14 DELTA DENTAL 10/1/99 OCT $295.44 TOTAL FOR AFSCME COUNCIL 14 $295.44 26593 FORTIS BENEFITS INS SIT DISABILITY 10/1/99 OCT $81.00 26593 FORTIS BENEFITS INS SIT DISABILITY 10/1/99 OCT $6.00 26593 FORTIS BENEFITS INS SIT DISABILITY 10/1/99 OCT $6.00 26593 FORTIS BENEFITS INS SIT DISABILITY 10/1/99 OCT $6.00 TOTAL FOR FORTIS BENEFITS INS CO $99.00 26594 MN NePERS PERA LIFE INSURANCE 10/1/99 $33.00 TOTAL FOR MNNCPERS $33.00 26595 TONKA BAY-CITY OF RENT-TB LIQUOR 10/1/99 OCT $1,100.00 TOTAL FOR TONKA BA Y-ClTY OF $1,100.00 26596 US POSTMASTER 3RD QTR UIB POSTAGE 10/1/99 093099 $165.70 26596 US POSTMASTER 3RD QTR UtB POSTAGE 10/1/99 093099 $331.40 TOTAL FOR US POSTMASTER $497.10 26597 TOWLE REAL ESTATE RENT -PLAZA RENT 10/1/99 23730-10 $3,892.77 TOTAL FOR TOWLE REAL ESTATE COMPANY $3,892.77 26598 WATERFORD CENTER OCT RENT-WATER FORD L1Q 10/1/99 OCT $7,182.36 TOTAL FOR WATERFORD CENTER LLP $7,182.36 . 26599 HEBERT,KATHLEEN SEC 125 REIMB 10/6/99 $192.30 TOTAL FOR HEBERT, KATHLEEN $192.30 26600 HURM, JAMES MILEAGE/EXPENSES 10/6/99 $44.14 TOTAL FOR HURM, JAMES $44.14 26601 MTKA SOUND & L1GHTI AN CABLE 10/6/99 2290 $17.90 26601 MTKA SOUND & L1GHTI eOUNCIL AUDIONlDEO 10/6199 2068 $132.06 TOTAL FOR MTKA SOUND & LIGHTING $149.96 26602 NIELSEN, BRADLEY JAN-SEPT MILEAGE 10/6/99 $602.46 TOTAL FOR NIELSEN, BRADLEY $602.46 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $268.25 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $2,354.14 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $940.81 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $668.95 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $529.20 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $490.98 . 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $239.36 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $196.31 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $160.86 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $121.07 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6/99 $38.12 26603 NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 10/6199 $514.17 TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER $6,522.22 26604 KIRK DICKEY REFUND ESCROW 10/6/99 30855 $100.00 TOTAL FOR KIRK DICKEY $100.00 26605 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE 10/6/99 757465 $143.73 26605 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI WINE CREDIT 10/6199 755807 ($26.67) 26605 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/6199 757465 $742.51 26605 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/6/99 757466 $653.58 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $1,513.15 26606 ALERT FIRE & SAFETY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINT 10/12/99 21898 $25.54 TOTAL FOR ALERT FIRE & SAFETY CO $25.54 26607 AMERICAN PLANNING PLANNING BOOK 10112/99 $30.95 TOTAL FOR AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC $30.95 Thursday, October 07,1999 Page 2017 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount 26608 BOB'S PERSONAL COF COFFEE 10/12/99 28495 $106.00 TOTAL FOR BOB'S PERSONAL COFFEE SVC $106.00 26609 BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIP MAINT 10/12/99 894706 $109.38 TOTAL FOR BOYER TRUCK PARTS $109.38 26610 BRAD RAGAN TIRE, IN EQUIP MAINT 10/12/99 001836 $30.83 TOTAL FOR BRAD RAGAN TIRE, INC $30.83 26611 BUSINESS & LEGAL RE SAFTY MTG LIBRARY 10/12/99 2673951 $320.08 TOTAL FOR BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORST, INC. $320.08 26612 CARLSON EXCAVATIN CURB STOP MAINT 10/12/99 $1,650.00 TOTAL FOR CARLSON EXCAVATING $1,650.00 26613 COLLINS ELECTRICAL SIGNAL MAINT 10/12/99 JR21819 $99.39 TOTAL FOR COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM $99.39 26614 EVERGREEN LAND SE HWY 7 ACCESS CONSULTANT 10/12/99 8618 $4,574.32 26614 EVERGREEN LAND SE HWY 7 CONSULTANT 10/12/99 8579 $755.31 TOTAL FOR EVERGREEN LAND SERVICE CO $5,329.63 26615 E-Z RECYCLING INC. SEPT RECYCLING CONTRACT 10/12/99 10423 $4,920.00 TOTAL FOR E-Z RECYCLING INC. $4,920.00 26616 HAWKINS WATER TRE WATER MAINT SUPPLIES 10/12/99 205753 $72.38 . TOTAL FOR HAWKINS WATER TREATlWENT $72.38 26617 FRIENDS SO. SHORE S SEPT ROOM RENTAL 10/12/99 092499 $50.00 26617 FRIENDS SO. SHORE S SEPT ROOM RENTAL 10/12/99 092499 $75.00 TOTAL FOR FRIENDS SO. SHORE SR CTR $125.00 26618 G & K SERVICES AUG UNIFORMS 10112/99 604431-08 $237.38 26618 G & K SERVICES AUG UNIFORMS 10/12/99 604431-08 $35.04 TOTAL FOR G & K SERVICES $272.42 26619 GEEK SQUAD NETWORK SUPPORT 10/12/99 24138 $633.93 TOTAL FOR GEEK SQUAD $633.93 26620 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR AUGUST PRISONER EXP 10/12/99 2404 $74.50 TOTAL FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER $74.50 26621 HOPKINS PARTS COM EQUIP MAINT 10/12/99 94018 $7.48 TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY $7.48 26622 INFONET WIZARDS, IN POWER POINT CLASS-HURM 10/12/99 990177 $150.00 . 26622 INFONET WIZARDS, IN POWER POINT CLASS-PLANNING 10/12/99 990177 $300.00 26622 INFONET WIZARDS, IN POWER POINT CLASS-ROLEK 10/12/99 990177 $150.00 TOTAL FOR INFONET WIZARDS, INC. $600.00 26623 INTERNAL REVENUE S 3RD PARTY SICK PAY FICAlMED 10/12/99 3RD QTR $122.40 TOTAL FOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $122.40 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG PERKINS LEGAL 10/12/99 337125 $2,411.35 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG PERSONNEL LEGAL 10/12/99 337123 $162.00 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG SR CTR LEGAL 10/12/99 337127 $752.80 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG PERSONNEL LEGAL 10112/99 337123 $162.00 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG PERSONNEL LEGAL 10/12/99 337123 $162.00 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG JOHNSON LEGAL 10/12/99 337131 $1,171.00 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG GYSLAND HAl BLDG LEGAL 10/12/99 337130 $1,066.97 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA GENERAL LEGAL-AUG 10112/99 337122 $1,762.90 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG ELLERS AD LEGAL 10/12/99 337129 $30.00 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG CABALKA LEGAL 10/12/99 337126 $829.50 26624 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DA AUG LAND USE LEGAL 10112/99 337124 $294.00 TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY... $8,804.52 26625 LIGHTNING LEGAL CO COURIER SERVICE 10/12/99 17286 $25.30 Thursday, October 07, 1999 Page 3 of7 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR LIGHTNING LEGAL COURIER $25.30 26626 LINK, CLARE T. MEETING MINUTES 10/12/99 SEPT $120.00 26626 LINK, CLARE T. MEETING MINUTES 10/12/99 SEPT $240.00 TOTAL FOR LINK, CLARE T. $360.00 26627 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIP MAl NT 10/12/99 1304805 $2.55 TOTAL FOR MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY $2.55 26628 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 10112/99 n655317 $404.69 TOTAL FOR OFFICE DEPOT $404.69 26629 MINNCOMM PAGING OCT PAGER 10/12/99 10999 $8.63 TOTAL FOR MINNCOMM PAGING $8.63 26630 MN SUN PUBLICATION LEGAL AD 99-079 10/12/99 259829 $89.70 26630 MN SUN PUBLICATION LEGAL AD-SHOPPING CTR 10112/99 260182 $37.70 26630 MN SUN PUBLICATION TRUCK BID AD 10/12/99 257829 $83.85 26630 MN SUN PUBLICATION WATER LEGAL AD 10/12/99 262118 $338.00 26630 MN SUN PUBLICATION LEGAL AD 10/12/99 259448 $81.90 TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS $631.15 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $31.93 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $53.40 . 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $9.59 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $32.58 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $57.55 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $11.66 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $9.59 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $12.71 26631 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 10/12/99 $16.50 TOTAL FOR MINNEGASCO $235.51 26632 WM. MUELLER & SONS BLACKTOP 10/12/99 4626-09 $4,460.89 26632 WM. MUELLER & SONS SAND 10/12/99 4626-09 $89.07 TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. $4,549.96 26633 ORONO, CITY OF SEPT ANIMAL CONTROL 10/12/99 1232-99 $1,386,18 TOTAL FOR ORONO, CITY OF $1,386.18 26634 PATHWAY BOOK SERV BOOK-MAKE IT UNANIMOUS 10/12/99 AM1033 $28.90 TOTAL FOR PATHWAY BOOK SERVICE $28.90 . 26635 PROTOCOL COMMUNI OCT -DEC WEB SERVICE 10/12/99 99091111 $75.00 TOTAL FOR PROTOCOL COMMUNICATIONS, INC $75.00 26636 E.H RENNER & SON'S AMESBURY WELL MAlNT 10/12/99 04201 $16,417.81 TOTAL FOR E.H RENNER & SON'S $16,417.81 26637 ROGERS, DON PACKET DELIVERY 10/12/99 $125.00 TOTAL FOR ROGERS, .DON $125.00 26638 LUBRICATION TECH,IN OIL 10/12/99 180154-0 $296.75 TOTAL FOR LUBRICATION TECH, INC $296. 75 26639 SHOREWOOD TREE R GRIND STUMPS 10/12/99 1574 $159.75 26639 SHOREWOOD TREE R STUMP REMOVAL 10/12/99 1512 $127.80 26639 SHOREWOOD TREE R TREE REMOVAL 10/12/99 1573 $413.00 TOTAL FOR SHOREWOOD TREE RESIDENTIA $700.55 26640 SHOREWOOD TRUE V SUPPLIES 10/12/99 31533 $8.38 26640 SHOREWOOD TRUE V EQUIP MAINT 10/12/99 32379/81/400 $10.26 TOTAL FOR SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE $18.64 26641 SW CONTRACTORS SU BOOM LIFT RENTAL 10112/99 94229 $155.26 TOTAL FOR SWCONTRACTORSSUPPLY $155.26 Thursday, October 07, 1999 Page 4 of7 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # AmoUl,t 26642 SWANDY, DONALD MILEAGE 10/12/99 SEPT $23.64 26642 SWANDY, DONALD MILEAGE 10/12/99 SEPT $23.64 26642 SWANDY, DONALD MILEAGE 10/12/99 SEPT $23.65 TOTAL FOR SWANDY, DONALD $70.93 26643 SPEEDWAY SUPERAM FUEL 10112/99 $968.53 TOTAL FOR SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA $968.53 26644 TONKA AUTO AND BOD EQUIP MAINT 10/12/99 224048 $47.26 TOTAL FOR TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUPP $47,26 26645 TWIN CITY WATER CLI AUGUST WATER TESTING 10/12/99 5739 $20.00 26645 TWIN CITY WATER CLI WATER ANALYSIS 10/12/99 5397 $35.00 TOTAL FOR TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC $55.00 26646 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1 0/12/99 $45.68 26646 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 10/12/99 $45.68 TOTAL FOR US WEST $91.36 26647 VESSCO. INC. WATER MAINT 10/12/99 19622 $363.68 TOTAL FOR VESSCO, INC $363.68 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE FREEMAN PK AUG ENG 10/12/99 1074.37-04 $6,564.70 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG ENG 10/12/99 1074.44-01 $184.00 . 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE WATERS EDGE AUG ENG 10/12/99 1074.20-05 $465.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SHOREWOOD PONDS AUG ENG 10/12/99 1074.39-04 $495.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE SHADY ISL LIFT STATION ENG 10/12/99 1162.00-06 $1,558.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE OLD MKT RD WALL AUG ENG 10/12/99 1074.34-10 $230.65 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE NOBLE RD AUG ENG 10112/99 1151.00-07 $31.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE GIS MAP 10112/99 1074.26-09 $414.25 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG STORM WATER ENG 10/12/99 1074.08-19 $6,588.75 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG SR CTR ENG 10/12/99 1074.25-07 $169.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG PROJECT OBSERVATION 10/12/99 1074.00-14 $110.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG GENERAL ENG 10/12/99 1074.99-04 $248.00 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE 99 TRAIL ENG 10/12/99 1190.00-02 $12,724.17 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE 7/41 AUG ENG 10/12/99 1122.10-03 $1,271.51 26648 WSB AND ASSOCIATE AUG GENERAL ENG 10/12/99 1074.99-04 $258.00 TOTAL FOR WSB AND ASSOCIATES $31,312.03 26649 BELLBOY CORPORA TI LIQUOR 10/12/99 17361100 $590.95 26649 BELLBOY CORPORA TI LIQUOR 10112/99 17322900 $218.30 . 26649 BELLBOY CORPORA TI WINE 10/12/99 17319400 $63.85 26649 BELLBOY CORPORATI LIQUOR 10/12/99 17323000 $383.70 26649 BELLBOY CORPORA TI LIQUOR 10/12/99 17361300 $104.85 26649 BELLBOY CORPORA TI LIQUOR 10/12/99 17361400 $578.20 TOTAL FOR BELLBOY CORPORATION $1,939.85 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC 10/12/99 30530300 $16.55 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC 10/12/99 30546200 $31.12 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC 10/12/99 30530500 $48.08 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC 10/12/99 30549200 $65.97 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC 10/12/99 30507500 $157.14 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISClSUPPLIES 10/12/99 30507700 $23.34 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC/SUPPLIES 10/12/99 30507700 $n.72 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10/12/99 30507500 $18.87 26650 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10/12/99 30530500 $30.50 TOTAL FOR BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY $469.29 26651 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 10/12/99 53883 $180.00 26651 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 10/12/99 53073 $258.60 26651 DAHLHEIMER DIST INC BEER 10/12/99 53534 $87.80 26651 DAHLHEIMER OIST INC BEER 10/12/99 53076 $312.00 ~ Thursday, October 07,1999 Page 5 of7 Check # Vender Name Description Check Date Invoice # Amount TOTAL FOR DAHLHEIMER DIST INC $838.40 26652 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING 10/12/99 $16.85 26652 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING 10/12/99 $20.90 26652 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING 10/12/99 $20.90 TOTAL FOR GTE.DJRECTORIES $58.65 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C MISC 10/12/99 107191 $67.45 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 107190 $1,102.62 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 107196 $541.52 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 107207 $426.87 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 110883 $385.95 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 110206 $377.23 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 110201 $315.70 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE 10/12/99 110225 $70.02 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C MISC 10/12/99 107208 $115.30 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 110226 $359.95 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 118977 ($69.98) 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C MISC 10/12/99 110202 $50.81 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 107198 $146.69 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 110207 $804.85 . 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 110202 $1,538.68 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 107197 $1,897.76 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 107208 $2,162.01 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 107191 $2,839.35 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR CREDIT 10/12/99 119286 ($184.46) 26653 GRIGGS, COOPER & C LIQUOR 10/12/99 107192 $146.69 TOTAL FOR GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY $13,095.01 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 100646 ($5.51 ) 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 1022396 $1,287.65 26655 JOHNSON BROS LIQU WINE 10/12/99 1025051 $438.01 26655 JOHNSON BROS UQU WINE 10/12/99 1023115 $572.25 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 1025052 $783.05 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 1022398 $1,213.05 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 1022397 $2,325.63 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 99821 ($84.05) 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 99834 ($16.50) . 26655 JOHNSON BROS UQU WINE 10/12/99 1025053 $326.20 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 100648 ($9.65) 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1023057 $926.66 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE CREDIT 10/12/99 100647 ($11.02) 26655 JOHNSON BRas LIQU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1025708 $673.38 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU FREIGHT CREDIT 10/12/99 100556 ($5.00) 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 10112/99 1025791 $105.00 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1025792 $105.00 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 100649 ($10.34) 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1025706 $124.59 26655 JOHNSON BRas L1QU WINE 10112/99 1023116 $130.90 26655 JOHNSON BROS UQU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1025707 $704.18 26655 JOHNSON BRas LIQU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1023058 $912.94 26655 JOHNSON BRas LIQU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1023059 $1,218.78 26655 JOHNSON BROS L1QU WINE 10/12/99 1025792 $53.55 26655 JOHNSON BRas UQU WINE 10/12/99 1023114 $112.20 26655 JOHNSON BROS LIQU LIQUOR 10/12/99 1025793 $105.00 TOTAL FOR JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO. $1I,975.95 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10/12/99 7529 $163.26 Tllursday, October 07,1999 Page 60f7 Check # Vender Name Description . Check Date Invoice # Amount 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10/12/99 7550 $299.31 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10/12/99 7549 $299.31 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10/12/99 7530 $163.26 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10112/99 7551 $190.47 26656 LAKE REGION VENDIN MISC 10/12/99 7528 $272.10 TOTAL FOR LAKE REGION VENDING $1,387.71 26657 LEEF BROS MATS 10/12/99 996227 $27.51 TOTAL FOR LEEF BROS $27.51 26658 MARK VII BEER 10/12/99 26369-09 $4,576.00' 26658 MARK VII BEER 10/12/99 21873-09 $7,263.45 26658 MARK VII BEERlMISC 10112/99 49163-09 $4,763.10 26658 MARK VII MISC 10/12/99 49163-09 $37.15 26658 MARK VII MISC 10/12/99 21873-09 $96.50 26658 MARK VII MISC 10/12/99 26369-09 $97.90 TOTAL FOR A/ARK VII $16,834.10 26659 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 10/12/99 $19.97 26659 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 10/12/99 $37.83 26659 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 10112/99 $19.98 26659 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 10/12/99 $37.82 . TOTAL FOR MARLIN'S TRUCKING $115.60 26660 NORTH STAR ICE MISC 10/12/99 63270-09 $189.42 26660 NORTH STAR ICE MISC 10112/99 63272-09 $329.58 26660 NORTH STAR ICE MISC 10/12/99 72250-09 $470.28 TOTAL FOR NORTH STAR ICE $989.28 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 10/1~ 533533 $836.15 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/12/99 53534 $58.95 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 10/12/99 53534 $950.40 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 10/12/99 535619 $1,960.04 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRt WINE 10112/99 535618 $919.44 26661 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRI WINE 10/12/99 533535 $601.65 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI WINE 10/12/99 535620 $319.00 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI L1QUORIWINE 10112/99 535618 $54.00 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/12/99 535619 $108.00 26661 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/12/99 533535 $330.69 . TOTAL FOR PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS $6,138.32 26662 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI LIQUOR 10/12/99 953656 $44.33 TOTAL FOR QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO $44.33 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER 10/12/99 300~9 $6,916.45 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER 10/12/99 30100-09 $6,960.35 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN BEER 10112/99 30210-09 $1,568.90 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN MISC 10112/99 30210-09 $84.80 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN MISC 10112/99 300~9 $110.45 26663 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN MISC 10/12/99 30100-09 $210.05 TOTAL FOR THORPE .DISTRIBUTING COMPA $21,851.00 26664 WINE COMPANY (THE) WINE 10/12/99 27352 $330.70 26664 WINE COMPANY (THE) WINE 10/12/99 27350 $179.37 26664 WINE COMPANY (THE) WINE 10112/99 027351 $186.70 TOTAL FOR WINE COMPANY (THE) $696. 77 TOTAL CHECKS $196,646.20 Tllursday, October 07,1999 Page 70f7 Payroll Register Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 214820 BASTYR CONNIE D 584.16 9/28/99 214821 BROWN LAWRENCE A 1,677.16 9/28/99 214822 BUHL DONALD J 93.04 9/28/99 214823 BUHL SUSAN E 288.53 9/28/99 214824 COLE ANGELA M 550.05 9/28/99 214825 DA VIS CHARLES S 900.17 9/28/99 214826 DUFFY DAVID C 121.67 9/28/99 214827 FLORA CHERI L 103.78 9/28/99 214828 GARFUNKEL JOHN J 184.70 9/28/99 214829 GRAHN AMY L 185.61 9/28/99 214830 GROUT TWILA R 718.03 9/28/99 214831 HEBERT KATHLEEN A 616.33 9/28/99 214832 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 630.41 9/28/99 . 214833 HELLING PAMELA J 639.37 9/28/99 214834 HEURKINS MARK K 326.45 9/28/99 214835 HOGAN ANN T 296.40 9/28/99 214836 HURM JAMES C 1,815.65 9/28/99 214837 JAKEL BRIAN D 123.75 9/28/99 214838 JENSEN JEFFREY A 46.08 9/28/99 214839 JOHNSON DENNIS D 974.42 9/28/99 214840 KREGER KYMBERL Y K 93.74 9/28/99 214841 LATTERNER SUSAN M 303.11 9/28/99 214842 LIZEE CHRISTINE G 184.70 9/28/99 214843 LOVE CLIFFORD W 219.84 9/28/99 214844 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 859.82 9/28/99 214845 LUND JASON R 113.72 9/28/99 . 214846 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 9/28/99 214847 MASON BRADLEY J 903.72 9/28/99 214848 MITL YNG SARA J 285.87 9/28/99 214849 NAAB THERESA L 664.18 9/28/99 214850 NICCUM LAWRENCE A 1,192.98 9/28/99 214851 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 958.79 9/28/99 214852 P AZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,243.29 9/28/99 214853 POUNDER CHRISTOPHER J 1,035.08 9/28/99 214854 RANDALL DANIEL J 962.60 9/28/99 214855 ROLEK ALAN J 1,200.04 9/28/99 214856 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 496.23 9/28/99 214857 SCHNEEWIN JACQUELYN K 870.06 9/28/99 214858 STOVER KRIST! 184.70 9/28/99 214859 SW ANDBY DONALD R 992.03 9/28/99 Wednesday, September 29,1999 Page 1 of2 '.,A . . Check # 214860 Last Name ZERBY First Name MI MICHAEL S Total of Checks Check Amt 184.70 $23,865.06 Check Date 9/28/99 Wednesday, September 29,1999 Page 2 of2