The URL can be used to link to this page

042699 CC Reg AgP ",~ '<C' , ... . t CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 26,1999 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love _ Stover _ Garfunkel_ Lizee _ Zerby ____ B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. April 12, 1999 (Att.-#2A Minutes) B. City Council Executive Session Minutes April 21, 1999 (Att.-#2B Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding County Road 19 (Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution) B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Settlement Agreement (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution) C. A Motion to Adopt Resolution Approving a Settlement Agreement with OSM per Recommendations (Att.-#3C Proposed Resolution) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Joint Seal Coating Project (Att.-#3D Proposed Resolution) E. A Motion to Approve a Sign Permit for 19285 State Highway 1 (Att.-#3E Planner's Memorandum) F. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Proclaiming Arbor Day as Saturday, May 1, 1999 (Att.-#3F Proposed Resolution) .' ':. .' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. APRIL 26,1999 PAGE20F3 NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removedfrom the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative A. A Motion Directing Staff to Prepare a Resolution Regarding Development Stage Plans for Shorewood Ponds - Aka. Eagle Crest (Att.-#6A Planner's Memoranda, City Engineer's Memorandum) Applicant: Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. Location: Northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and Highway 1 B. Consideration of a Motion Regarding an Appeal to the Zoning Administrator's Interpretation of City Fence Regulations (Att.-#6B Planner's Memorandum and Appellant's letter) Appellant: Ron Smith Location: 20445 Radisson Road 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ACCEPT A FEASmlL1TY REPORT FOR EXTENSION OF PUBLIC UTILTIES TO SHOREWOOD PONDS (Att.-#7 Engineer's Memorandum & Feasibility Report) 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES (Art.-#8 Proposed Agreement) 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION AUTHORIZING AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECOM (AERIAL) TO APPLY FORA CONDmONAL USE PERMIT USING THE WEST END WATER TOWER FOR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (Att.-#9 Applicant's Request Letter) 10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING A FEASmlLITY REPORT - NOBLE ROAD & ESTABLISH PUBLIC , INFORMATION MEETING (Att.-#10 Engineer's Report & Proposed Resolution) 11. DISCUSSION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. Transportation Chapter B. Community Facilities . Chapter ~ .' .... .. IV CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. APRIL 26, 1999 PAGE30F3 C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Requesting Extension for Submittal of Comprehensive Plan (Att.-#11 C Proposed Resolution) 12. DISCUSSION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION I ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE (Att.-#12 Draft Ordinance) 13. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CHANGE CITY HALL OPEN HOURS TO 8:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. (Att.-#13 Administrator's Memorandum) 14. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS 15. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Report on Fire Department Review Committee Meeting Held April 27, 1999 B. Report on Fourth of July Committee Meeting 16. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att.-#16) ..~' ~. ~""';'. " ." . .. ; t , I . ! ~.. CITY OF SHOREWOO.D 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.neVshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, April 26, 1999 Agenda Item #3A: This item formalizes the support for realignment of the County Road 19 - Smithtown Road intersection under alternative 3. Hennepin County requested.that the City Council formalize support from both the City of Shorewood and the City of Tonka Bay. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. Agenda Item #3B: This resolution approves a settlement agreement regarding the Lundgren Bros. suit Agenda Item #3C: OSM and Associates served as the design engineers for the Smithtown Road Watermain Project, (Eureka Rd to contry Club Rd, CP 95-16, Ryan Contracting). The Contractor brought suit against the City stating the design was in error; The City. of Shorewood brought claim against OSM and Assocates to address this claim by the Contractor. This agreement settles the City's claim against OSM and Assocates, Inc., by resolution. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. . Agenda Item #3D: This resolution authorizes advertisement for bids for the annaul seal coating of various roadways in Shorewood. This is being completed as a joint project with the City of Tonka Bay. The bid opening is scheduled for May 191h, 1999. Agenda Item #3E: Lakeway Sign Company, on behalf of Personal Physicians of Minnesota, has requested a sign permit for a new freestanding sign to be located in front of the office building at 19285 State Highway 7. The proposed sign complies with the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code, provided that two other signs on the property are removed in order not to exceed three signs for the property. The Planning Department recommends approval, which requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #3F: Each year the City Council establishes the day Shorewood celebrates as Arbor Day by reso!ution. This year Shorewood Arbor Day is Saturday, May I.' . The , resolution encourages citizens of Shorewood to plant a tree on that day. The Council is invited-io MlUlor Park Saturday, May 1 at 9:00 a.m. where we willplant a tree. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER f Executive Summary. City Council Meeting of April 26, 1999 Page 2 of3 Agenda Item #6A: Eaglecrest Northwest, Inc. has submitted development stage plans for a 62- unit senior housing project to be called Shorewood Ponds. The request was tabled at 6 April meeting of the Planning Commission when the Commission asked the developer to provide better landscaping and grading plans. At the 20 April Planning Commission meeting the Planning Director recommended approval of the plans based upon a much improved landscape and tree preservation plan. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval, subject to several conditions set forth by staff. In addition the Commission suggested: 1. 2. The developer's attorney should elaborate on the age restriction provision to be included in the protective covenants for the project. Any future street lighting be subject to the City's policy relative to resident' requests. The City should continue to monitor traffic at the intersection of Eureka Road and Highway 7. . 3. Agenda Item #6B: Mr. Ron Smith, 20445 Radisson Road, proposes to build a six-foot high board on board fence that the Planning Director states does not meet the requirement of being at least 25 percent open to allow light and air to pass through. Mr. Smith feels that his design complies with the Zoning Code. The Planning Director has agreed to an informal appeal process in which if the Planning Commission and City Council agree with Mr. Smith's interpretation of the Code, the permit will be issued. At its 20 April meeting the Planning Commission split 3-3 on the matter. If a majority of the City Council agrees with Mr. Smith's interpretation, the fence permit will be issued. Agenda Item #7: The City Engineer Larry Brown will present options to the City Council on the provision of utilities to the proposed Shorewood Ponds development. . Agenda Item #8: Financing of utility extensions will be discussed. Council may wish to consider authorizing the Mayor and Administrator to contract with our financial consultants, Springsted Inc., to offer advice on specific financing options. Agenda Item #9: American Portable Telecom (APT, aka Aerial) has requested permission to make application for a conditional use permit to locate personal telecommunication service (PCS) antennae on the City's west end water tower. While authorization to make the application only requires a simple majority vote by the Council, a conditional use permit will ultimately require a four-fifths vote. Agenda Item #10: The "older portion" of Noble Road immediately west of Grant Lorenz Rd. is to be reconstructed this year in accordance iwht the Capital ImproVIl1ent Program. This motion accepts the feasibility report and sets a tentative Project Open House date of May 12, from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.. Agenda Item #11: This is an opportunity for the City Council to discuss the transportation and community facilities chapters of the Comprehensive Plan and offer input for Planning Commission deliberations. ,/~ - . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAfT Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Garfunkel, Stover, Lizee and Zerby; Administrator Hurm; Planning Director Nielsen; Finance Director Rolek; City Engineer Brown and City Attorney Keane. B. Review Agenda The agenda was accepted as amended: Add item 12B: EUREKA OPEN SPACE WATER ASSESSMENT REBATE, and remove item 8. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes. March 22, 1999 Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded to approve the City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes of March 2, 1999, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. B. City Council Special Meeting Minutes. March 22, 1999 Lizee moved, Garfunkel seconded to approve the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 22, 1999, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. March 22, 1999 Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded to approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 22, 1999 as amended: Page. 3, Paragraph 4, ...as this become open, they should...to the Park Foundation. Motion passed 5/0. D. City Council Special Meeting Minutes. March 29, 1999 Lizee moved, Zerby seconded to approve the City Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 29, 1999 as amended: Page 1, Item 2, Paragraph 4, ...in favor of allowine for expansion of the._current policy seems to result in contractors... Motion passed 3/0 (Commissioners Garfunkel & Stover abstain). *ZA f / CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 2 E. City Council Executive Meeting Minutes.. March 29, 1999 Lizee moved, Zerby seconded to approve the City Council Executive Meeting Minutes of March 29, 1999 as presented. Motion passed 3/0 (Commissioners Garfunkel & Stover abstain). 3. CONSENT AGENDA Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded approving the Motions contained on the Consent Agenda as presented, and Adopting the Resolutions therein: A. A Motion Approving ADA Addendum to Job Description for Liquor Operations Manager Position B. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-019, "A Resolution Authorizing . the Mayor and City Clerk to Enter Into a License Agreement With Hennepin County for Use of Electronic Data." C. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 99-020, "A Resolution Approving Change Order for Project No. 95-17 Strawberry Lane." Motion passed 5/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Bob Gagne. 24850 Amlee Road. discussed the situation at the Senior Center. He reported the ceiling is still leaking and he would like Engineer Brown to take a look at it. Mr. Gagne also asked Attorney Keane about the status of the law suit and asked that work continue so a solution can be realized in the near future. Engineer Brown asked Mr. Gagne to report any situation to staff first. He brought up a memo he had received from Attorney Alsop stating that the bonding company met with GEH that day and they may know in the very near future as to whether the bonding company will accept the current negotiation. . 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on Park Commission Meeting Held March 23, 1999 Commissioner Dallman reported on the meeting of March 23 as reported in the minutes. highlighting the reconfiguration of Field #2 at Freeman Park. and the discussion of the Comprehensive Plan and the suggested changes. Commissioner Dallman also recapped the trail walk held on Saturday. April 10, including the discussion with citizens after the walk regarding their desire for trails in Shorewood. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 3 B. Consideration of an Ordinance Adopting a Formula to Determine Park Dedication Fees Commissioner Dallman stated that the recommendation of the Park Commission was to change the Park Dedication Fees to be 5% of the value of the raw land, with a cap at $7,500. Mayor Love expressed concern regarding the proposed increases in Park Dedication Fees. He also voiced his concern about relying on future development to increase parks land, as the City is reaching maximum development capacity.. Mayor Love stated he would welcome more discussion on this issue before voting on it. Commissioner Garfunkel questioned how these figures were arrived at and stated there is no basis for comparison. Garfunkel also pointed out the issue of affordable housing in Shorewood and how this increase would make that goal more difficult. . Commissioner Dallman suggested a joint discussion between the Park Commission and the City Council. Mter discussion, the Council members agreed to hold a joint meeting with the Park Commission on May II, 1999. 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative Commissioner Turgeon reported on the Planning Commission meeting held on April 6, 1999 as reported in the minutes. 7. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR CITY REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 4TH OF JULY COMMITTEE & DISCUSSION ON FUNDING OF ACTIVITY . Terry Roeser of the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce explained her letter of request regarding funding for additional police protection and sanitation for the fourth of July celebration. She stated they are also requesting a City representative from Shorewood for the 4th of July Committee to help make this a family-oriented event. Mayor Love stated that he has been involved for approximately 11 years in the fireworks safety issues and would like to see another Councilmember involved with the events. Councilmember Zerby expressed interest and volunteered his time to the committee, at which time Ms. Roeser provided information on their next meeting, May 5th at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Love questioned the funding that has been requested. Ms. Roeser reiterated that this funding is not to go for fireworks, but for extra police patrolling and sanitation. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 4 Commissioner Garfunkel pointed out that last year the Council voted not to put this money into the budget, so it would have to be allocated from somewhere else. Commissioner Stover stated she does not believe that tax dollars should be used as contributions. If citizens wish to contribute on a personal level that is one thing, but contribution to any organization is not where tax doUars should go. Mayor Love pointed out that this is a community event and most people in the community would be involved. Commissioner Zerby stated that payment for services is different than a gift. In this case, the City would be assisting in payment for services such as the police patrols and sanitation services. Zerby moved, Lizee seconded to contribute $1,000 to the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce Committee for the 4th of July Celebration to assist in the expenses of police and sanitation services. Motion passed 5/0. . 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH OSM PER RECOMMENDATION OF CITY ENGINEER & ATTORNEY Removed from the agenda. 9. DISCUSSION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. B. Natural Resources Chapter Land Use Chapter Planning Director Nielsen presented comments received from Councilmembers which were summarized for ease of discussion. . Mayor Love suggested going over each general area to determine if the intent has been changed, or if the changes are "word-smithing." Councilmember Garfunkel pointed out first that there seems to be a general direction of not using the terms "preserve" or "preservation." He noted that in a couple of places this changes the intent significantly. Councilmember Stover asked when the most recent changes were made. Planning Director Nielsen stated that the pages have different dates on them, as the date is only changed if the pages themselves had changes. Councilmember Lizee explained that her suggestions were more toward word-smithing, as she agrees with most of the current intent. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 5 Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concern over using the word "acquisition" as opposed to the word "preservation," as they don't mean the same thing. Council member Stover stated that the Council needs to decide the importance of acquisition or maintenance, and needs to decide if the City will control, or rather have Ordinances to suggest to citizens how to preserve their own land. Stover also pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan is a City plan, and the City needs to make clear goals and offer opportunities to private landowners regarding preservation. Stover suggested that the general feel of the document may be too hard. She indicated she would like to soften it by using words like "encourage" and "suggest" rather than words such as "enforce" or "maintain." Councilmember Garfunkel disagreed with this and pointed out that Ordinances are not suggestions. People are expected to comply. . Items where it was determined that intent has changed were taken note of by Planning Director Nielsen, as well as items which were solely language suggestions. This direction will be taken back to the Planning Commission. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING FINAL DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Planning Director Nielsen stated the Comprehem~ive Plan was to be done by the end of June, and the City is requesting a three-month extension. Nielsen stated that there is not really enough information as yet to take to neighborhood meetings in May. He suggested scheduling these for July or August. . Stover moved, Lizee seconded directing staff to prepare a Resolution to extend the deadline for the Comprehensive Plan by 3 months, making it the end of September, for consideration at the April 26 meeting. Motion passed 5/0. 10. DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL OBJECTIVES FOR LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Administrator Hurm presented numerical objectives taken from the final Land Conservation report and recommendations. Mayor Love suggested that a committee could use these as a suggestion, but should probably make their own goals in their first few meetings. Councilmember Stover asked if there was currently a committee. Mayor Love stated there was not, the three people who did the report are a start, but more people with a wider base of experience and opinions should be solicited. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999. PAGE 6 Councilmember Stover stated if a committee is going to be formed, they should know what the expectations are before they get started. Councilmember Garfunkel suggested that the subjects of the staff study can define the objectives but the actual specific numerical objectives can be worked out by the committee. Administrator Hurm presented a draft of the staff report which included a potential goal statement and ordinance creating a Land Conservation Committee. Mayor Love requested information on the process to proceed. Councilmember Garfunkel asked for another meeting to discuss the goals and objectives. 11. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS City Attorney's Memorandum on Declaring an Emergency . Administrator Hurm presented a memo by Attorney Keane (who had to be excused early), regarding declaring an emergency which was prepared on request from the last meeting. Councilmember Garfunkel stated that the memo answered his questions quite well regarding the ramifications of declaring a state of emergency. Administrator Hurm invited the Councilmembers to the Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperative Cities Meeting on Thursday, May 20, 1999 at the Southshore Senior Community Center, where the sub-regional housing study and informational presentations on affordable housing will be made. Administrator Hurm answered questions from the last meeting regarding Tax Increment Financing (TIP) for the senior housing project, and the water system in particular. He advised . that TIP can be used but the City would have to clearly define their desired outcome right up front. He suggested some ideas might include to assure public improvements are done in a certain way, or to keep the units affordable. Finance Director Rolek stated that at this point, staff is only looking into the possibilities and this information is only a first step. Mayor Love stated that a Transportation Advisory Board notice was received and asked for a Councilmember to attend. Receiving no reply, Mayor Love stated he may be contacting some of the Councilmembers at a later date to discuss this meeting. Planning Director Nielsen gave an update on the Gideon's Woods billboard., He reported that the new president of the association sent a letter to the billboard company demanding that they remove the billboard. No action has been taken as yet, and Nielsen will continue to monitor the CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 7 situation. Nielsen also reported on a request for the next meeting agenda to include Arial Telecommunications who is asking to locate on the Shorewood water tower. Engineer Brown reported on a meeting held with Hennepin County regarding the County Road 19 intersection design. Hennepin County has asked the City to formalize the decision in resolution format, rather than a motion, and this will be on a future agenda. Also, the Capital Improvement Program calls for retaining wall repairs along Old Market Road. Brown reported that another area has sustained damage and is in need of repair. Quotes are being requested to find the most economical way to repair them. Brown also stated that he will attend a pretrial hearing on Marsh Pointe subdivision which is scheduled for Wednesday, April 14. Councilmember Zerby asked Engineer Brown to clarify the issue of the Southshore Center's leaky roof. . Engineer Brown stated the City has offered services, but the bonding company has been in court with the contractor trying to recoup the funds. Therefore, what Shorewood can or cannot do at the Southshore Center is currently caught up in a complicated process. Councilmember Garfunkel questioned the speed limit studies which were done a while ago and asked if there was any follow up information. Engineer Brown replied that there is not any follow up right now. The Department of Transportation will be sent the petition in the summer and more study can at that time. Engineer Brown indicated he will send a letter to the involved neighborhood that states this issue is still under study. 12. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Report on the Fire Department Review Committee Meeting Held on March 23, 1999 . Mayor Love reported on the meeting of March 23, 1999 where the limitations of the existing fire department were explored. Mayor Love stated that when the building was built in 1957 or 1958, there were approximately 48 volunteers responding to approximately 200 events. Currently, there are approximately 200 volunteers responding to approximately 750 events, with no upgrades made to the station. The meeting ended with this problem foremost in everyone's mind and it will be explored more thoroughly in the next meeting. 12B. DISCUSSION ON EUREKA OPEN SPACE WATER ASSESSMENT REBATE Councilmember Garfunkel stated that he had discussed the $4,400 special assessment for water with some of the original donators of the land. The request was made to take some of this funding that came back to the Water Fund and give it to MNLand Trust for a stewardship fund for this land. The point was made that the City had received something of value and MN' Land Trust has worked on this issue very hard. The donators would like to see the City show some CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 - PAGE 8 appreciation in the form of funds to keep the land maintained. Garfunkel stated there were some hard feelings from the neighbors in response to the City "glossing over" this issue. I Mayor Love stated that this may be the type of issue the Land Conservation Committee would address if such a committee is formed. Councilmember Zerby stated that this grant was presented with no "strings." The requests that were made in the beginning were agreed to and now this request for funding seems to be coming "out of the blue." Administrator Hurm pointed out that normally stewardship funds are for private land. The City can do some of the stewardship for this land since it is public land. Mayor Love and Councilmember Stover both indicated that they may support granting funds for this purpose at some future date, after more information is received, and the repercussions of such an action have been thoroughly examined. Mayor Love stated he would like to discuss this issue again after the Land Conservation Committee is formed. . Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded to take $2,500 from Contingency Funds and present it to the MN Land Trust for Stewardship of the Eureka Open Space Preserve. Motion failed 2/3 (Stover, Lizee and Love opposed). 13. ADJOURN Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded to adjourn at 10:28 p.m. subject to Approval of Claims. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kristine Kitzman, Recording Secretary . TimeSaver Off-Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION MONDAY, APRIL 21, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Love called the Executive Session to order at 7:05 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Zerby and Lizee and Consultant Tom Allen of Tom Allen and Associates B. Review Agenda There were no changes to the agenda as presented. 2. DISCUSSION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S PERFORMANCE The Council discussed a review of the City Administrator. The Council concluded that Mr. Allen should submit a proposal to assist the Council in reviewing the job description and to establish a format to set objectives for the Administrator. The City Council will then specifically define the roles of both the City Administrator and the City Council. Mr. Allen will submit a proposal to the City Council for their consideration at the May 10 City Council meeting. 3. ADJOURN There being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR ~b CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128' www.state.netlshorewood' cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Worlcs W April 22, 1999 . FROM: DA TE: RE: A Motion to Adopt A Resolution Regarding County Road 19 Intersection At the last project manager's meeting for the County Road 19-5rnithtown Road-Country Club Road Intersection Project, the County requested that. the Cities of Shorewood and T onka Bay formalize their support of the project by way of a City Council Resolution. . Attached for your consideration is a resolution requesting that Hennepin County continue to pursue Alternative 3 (realignment of the intersection), and that the County assume the role of the lead design agency for the project. This action coincides with the previous motion passed by the City Council in support of Alternative 3. n \.;1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3Q. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION MAKING APPROOVING CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR COUNTY ROAD 19 - SMlTHTOWN ROAD - COUNTRY CLUB ROAD INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has petitioned Hennepin County to perform an intersection study of County Road 19-5mithtwon Road-Country Club Road intersection, regarding the installation of a traffic signal; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County determined that the conditions of said intersection, as reported in "Exhibit A" was found to warrant the installation of a traffic signal and has been determined to fall within the top ten non-signalized intersections prioritized across Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has caused preparation of and has accepted a traffic study-feasibility report dated January 11, 1999 for said Improvement Project WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has sought input from the public and neighboring cities regarding alternatives considered, and has determined that realignment of said intersection as shown in Exhibit B is the preferred alternative, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the City Council of Shorewood hereby requests Hennepin County to commence with the design of Alternative 3, as indicated in "Exhibit B" of this resolution. 2. The City of Shorewood hereby requests that Hennepin County serve as the lead agency in the design and construction of said project. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 26th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR vide: . .~ ..::~!!:::i;i::l:l:l:l:e~:;::~':;Q.h,.~ Mem 0 ............. .... .... ..................................... ........... ....... ..;:;:::::;:;:::::...... ..;;....,.,.,..::::::::::::;::::. ......... .... ................ .41-- ;.:.............::::;:;:::;::::::::.:.... E1 JUN 2 5 i991. '~1~fi:.. :.:~.: . . &cc,dcd Paf'cr ... '. DA TE: June 23, 1997 i: r'T'..... ,~...,. ~ ~ ,''',' .'" ..,......:": ~ ~ .....,'.... . .....'1 .. ../.", TO: Cornmissi~n~~Penny Steele ~A Vern Ge7~-" 1 / ..... CSAH 19/5mithtown Road/Country Club Road Intersection FROM: SUBJECT: . At your request Public Works staff has examined traffic conditions at the CSAH 19/5mithtown Road/Country Club Road intersection in Shorewood/Tonka Bay. The examination has resulted in a determination that a traffic control signal is warranted at the intersection. Recognizing that traffic conditions at an intersection may warrant or support traffic signal installation, but only marginally, the County Board has adopted a traffic signal ranking system which prioritizes intersections based on traffic volumes and accident history. The CSA.H 19/5mithtown Road/Country Club Road inters'ection was examined against the program criteria, and it was determined that the intersection exceeds program criteria minimums. Preliminary calculations indicate the intersection falls within the top ten non-signalized intersections prioritized across the County. Normal practice provides that community approach the County with a request for traffic control signal installation at an intersection which meets or exceeds . program thresholds. As staff discusses the implications of a traffic signal . installation, the community is advised of the cost implications related to the installation. For traffic signal installations, the County's cost participation policy stipulates communities over 5000 in population (Shorewood) are required to participate in the cost of work while communities under 5000 in population (Tonka Bay) are not normally required to participate in the cost. Generally, the County absorbs the cost normally attributable to a community under 5000 in population. In this instance, it appears Shorewood would be responsible for 37- 1/2 percent of a traffic signal cost and the County would pay for 62-1/2 percent of cost (the County 25 percent plus Tonka Bay's 37-1/2 percent). At this point staff is unable to provide an estimate of cost for a traffic signal installation; however, it is likely the cost could range from S110,000 to $140,000. Regarding the recent history of the CSAH 19/5mithtown Road/Country Club Road intersection, in January, 1995 Public Works staff discussed with Shorewood staff traffic conditions at the intersection. At that time Shorewood was in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan and it was examining the feasibility of conducting a corridor study. along CSAH 19. Subsequent to January, 1995, staff has had no contact with city staff of Shorewood regarding a traffic signal at the intersection. VTG/JNG:mvr '1:''V'TTTnTrr ... :;'."- PENNY STEELE COMMISSIONER PHONE 612-~48-7R37 FAX 1>12-348-8701 TDO 612-~48-770" BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A-2400 GoVERN)'IENT CENTER ._-::-:;=;;::\ . MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240----=7r~~~ ~'\J/ \~ \r:'\ \n~{ ':~. \, \\ 1,1 Memorandum tr J~'.- ~ .,997 \0\ (.~ \ Date: 7/7/97 ~\I.~~ To: Mayor Thomas Dahlberg -~ From: Commissioner Penny Steele ~L'L~) J[i.<---,(2-,., RE: Traffic Signal at County Road 19/ Smithtown/Country Club Road Intersection . I asked our public works department to look into the need for a signal at the COtmty Road 19/ SmithtowniCountry Club Road Intersection. Here is the response I received. . PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -- ~-----~-.~ ~---~~-----~---~ t -~ I ' ~ j' ~ I . Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road / Country Club Road Alternative 3 f Ii il CITY OF ~ TONKA BAY t! :1 + + Smithtown Crossing I ~ ~ 1 f f , + o t) o o j g + .................~ ,.. \, ot) ! \ ~..~ ; " I i\ \ t) 0 o o ~ ~ :r' ... ::r ... ... ::c City of Shore wood, He~epin County, Minnesot,a ILr ,.......~:a"t::;~.';".:~ ,~. ~. '.. ,r r~l~~ i I t I I I 50 .. . 50 ,.. I ~ I " 'u, 0 I 01 d +' + + January 1999 . ~;::;~ ;/\ ;'t .:' ", ~,;.~';',~,'~";:t'./.~:;t~ .",'i'JiiI~.J~'#lfltil'~~t~~t'\ '<~ HIGH'l't'AX N'l' 4/ZZ/ H:J~~ l~: Z" !-JAGJ::: Z/::S H1ghtt'AX City ofShorewood Hennepin County, Minnesota Resolution 99-_ A Besoluuon Approving a Settlement Agreement WHEREAS, the City constructed certain Water System Improvements ("Improvements") within the City; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Marsh Pointe, LLP and Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc., have an interest in the title to certain parcels of real property located in the City ("PlaintiffS' Property"); . and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat, ch. 429, the City levied a special assessment against PlaintiffS' Property in the amount it alleged plaintiftS' Property benefited from the Improvements; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs dispute the amount of benefit Plaintiffs' Property received from the Improvements; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs commenced this action with regard to certain parcels ofPlaintiftS' Property identified in Exhibit A attached to plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal of Special Assessment in . . Connection With Improvements ("Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' ownership of the Subject Property is fur residential development purposes; and WHEREAS, the City has issued building permits fur some parcels of the Subject Property, but not fur the fullowing parcels ("Settlement Parcels"); LotIBlockl Addition 08/01/1 10/01/1 15101/1 17/01/1 Street Address 26995 Marsh Pointe Court 27125 Marsh Pointe Court 5670 Marsh Pointe Drive 5630 Marsh Pointe Drive it3~ tUGH'I'f"AX ~'I' 4/ZZ/ l~~~ l~: Z'/ }.JAGJ::: ;j/;j H1ghtt"AX 18/01/1 20101/1 22/01/1 24/01/1 25101/1 01/02/1 0'2/02/1 03/0211 04/02/1 05/02/1 26820 Marsh Pointe Circle 26870 Marsh Pointe Circle 26855 MarshPointe Circle 26805 Marsh Pointe Circle 5570 Marsh Pointe Drive 5695 Marsh Pointe Drive 5675 Marsh Pointe Drive 5655 Marsh Pointe Drive 5615 Marsh Pointe Drive 5595 Marsh Pointe Drive WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve this issues of this case without requiring a trial on the merits of the case, and have negotiated the following mutually acceptable resolution of this dispute. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City will reduce by $2,000 the special. assessment llIlDunt levied against each of the Settlement Parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that each party will bear their own costs, fees and disbursements incurred in the litigation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council shall Adopted by the Shorewood City Council this _ day of April, 1999, Woody Love, Mayor Attest: James C. Hunn, City Admim!iltrator 04841511.01 2. . .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.neVshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James H~ City Administrator LlIII}' Brown, Director of Public Works ~ April 22, 1999 . FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approvjng a Settlement Agreement with OSM and Associates, Inc., Smithtown Road Watermain Project 95-16. This item originates from the current litigation matter of Ryan Contracting Inc. vs. the City of Shorewood, as it relates to the Smithtown Road Watermain Project (from Eureka Road to Country Club Road). - .~ Included in the claims that Ryan Contracting has brought against the City, is a claim regarding the sufficiency of the plans and specifications for the project. The City's previous consultant, OSM and Associates, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications. In turn, the City.ofShorewood has filed a third party action against OSM to address this claim. '. In reply to this claim, representatives ofOSM have recently offered a settlement agreement with the City of Shorewood. As part of the offer, OSM will be expected. to aid the Gity in defending the remaining claims from Ryan Contracting. Staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution that authorizes the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the settlement agreement provided by OSM and Associates, Inc. ' ft ~J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3c. FROM LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY (612)896-3278 (THU) 4. 22' 99 15: 40/8T. 15: 39/NO. 4260918446 P 2 City ofShorewood Hemlepin County. Minnesota Resolution 99-_ A Resolution Relating to Dismissal of Third Party Defendant in the Matter of Ryan Contracting, IDe. v. the City of Shorewood WHEREAS. the City is involved in a construction dispute with Ryan Contracting, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City moved to inQlude the engineering firm. of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. ("OSM''), as a third party to this action; and WHEREAS. the City and OSM have agreed to dismiss all claims against OSM_ . NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOL Vim. the City agrees to rcleaije OSM tram all claims for total consideration in the amount of $7,500.00. Adopted by the Shorewood City Council this _ day of April, 1999. Woody Love. Mayor Attest: .. James C. Hurm, City Administrator 04K4559.01 ( ~- MEMORANDUM CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128' www.state.netJshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net TO: Mayor and City Council James H~ City Administrator . FROM: Lany Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: April 22, 1999 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution for Advertisement for Bids 1999 Bituminous Seal Coat Project By completing a joint project with the City of Tonka Bay, the cities should receive a break in the bid prices due to economy of scale. The City of Excelsior participates in this project every other year. Staff is recommending that the following streets be sealcoated: . Meadowview Lane Woodside Road Nelsine Drive Valle ood Lane Valle ood Circle Reutiman Lane The Capital Improvement Program provides for $55,000 for sealcoating each year. . It is anticipated that the above listed streets can be completed for this amount. If bids come in high, due to fluctuations in oil prices,. a reduction in the number of streets to be sealcoated will be made. If the attached resolution is approved, Advertisement for Bids will be placed in the City's Official newspaper, and bids will be opened at the Shorewood City Council Chambers on May 19, 1999. A resolution is attached for your consideration. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3cL. CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS FOR 1999 SEALCOATING PROJECT WHEREAS, the 1999 - 2003 Capital Improvement Program designates $55,000 for sealcoating IN 1999; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has identified streets within the City that need bituminous seal coating. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council hereby authorizes Advertisement for Bids to be placed in the City's Official Newspaper for Bituminous Sealcoating of Streets for the Cities of Shore wood and Tonka Bay, 1999. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 26th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR _ A } . . ADVERTISEMENT FORBIDS Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets For the Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay, Minnesota NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals will be received at the City Clerk's Office in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota at the Shorewood City Hall, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, until 10:00 a.m. on the 19th day of May, 1999 and will be publicly opened at said time and place by two or more designated officers or agents of the City of Shorewood. Said proposal to be for the furnishing of all labor and materials for the construction complete in place of the following; . 31,101 Gallons of Bituminous Seal Coat Material 551 Furnish and Apply Tons of Cover Aggregate 830 Apply Owner Furnished Aggregate Proposals arriving after the designated time will be returned unopened. The bids must be submitted on the proposal form provided in accordance with the contract documents, plans and specifications as prepared by the City of Shorewood, Department of Public Works, 24200 Smithtown Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, which are on file with the City Clerk of the City of Shorewood. Copies of Proposal Form Specifications for use by contractors submitting a bid may be obtained from City Hall, City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, upon a deposit (non-refundable) ofTen Dollars and No Cents ($10.00) per set. . No bids will be considered unless sealed and endorsed upon the outside wrapper , "BID FOR BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING" and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Shorewood and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or certified check, payable to the City of Shorewood for five percent (5.0%) of the amount bid to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event the bid is accepted and the bidder should fail to enter promptly into a written contract and furnish the required bonds. The Cities of Shorewood and Tonka Bay reserve the right to reject any and all bids. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of opening the bids. Date: April 26, 1999 BY: ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /S/ James C. Hurm PUBLISHED IN: The "Construction Bulletin" The "Sun -Sailor" Apri130, 1999 May 5, 1999 Sealcoat Project '99 AFB ~ j CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.slale.netlshorewood . cilyhall@shorewood.slale.nel MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: -20 April 1999 RE: Sign Permit - Personal Physicians of Minnesota FILE NO. Property - 19285 State Highway 7 Lake Way Signs, Inc. has submitted a signage plan for the office building located at 19285 State Highway 7. They propose to erect a freestanding sign (see Exhibit A) in front of the building near the driveway on the north side of the building. The location of the proposed sign and existing wall signs are shown on the applicant's site plan (Exhibit B). . The Zoning Code allows a total sign area up to 10 percent of the building silhouette as viewed from the street, and a total of up to three separate signs on the property. The applicant plans to remove two of the existing wall signs from the building, as they will be replaced by the freestanding sign. The freestanding sign contains 32 square feet of area, and the remaining wall sign contains 30 square feet of area, for a total of 62 square feet. Since the building silhouette contains 1316 square feet of area, the applicant is well under the maximum allowable sign area (131 square feet). Approval of the permit is recommended, subject to the condition that at least one of the existing wall signs be removed prior to erection of the freestanding sign. cc: Jim Hurm Carl R. Nelson Gregory Seifert, M.D. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3. E. OO'~8 NDl~V11V~SNI OO'OII dOJ/M sJsod paJuJed IZIX~X? (Z) OO'?9?S 'sapls-Z 'pOOMAld .9 ~ .~ (I) g . ~~[N]~[NJOO~ AW7(Q]~rnWJ~ ~~[N]U[N]~~ AWJ(Q]~~rn <<AWJ(Q]WJ((iJ~ . ~ AWJ(Q]OW M~~~>> A1[]\O/@ [N]~(Q) ,-/7 ocorw ~?8IEIB[I8IS' A?8IOOBI?8IO WJL(Q)~:illNMnIM illCQ) ~Nr\fTI:J)TI~AlHIcdI 1I\VJM(Q)~~cdI /$ LttSS NI'lI '1I.l/l0I'll,nd 'N .:"^ V alia.. oolt. "3NI'SNDlS AYM IDlY"] . . ~ ~ ,~ ..D ,~ ...c: K ~ rf/l /\'\ >0 ~\~ 1J' 1 Nor+h 'NCJI ~.I fV1.:;iN \Ii b 1$ ~ LfSl)(-q t 7-/10 1M ;J..) ~q ?L .~ '-4~~ (.: 1jS -- ~~.. . L. ~ ('{1tj ~ ~ "~ ..D "~ ...c: K ~ ~ .,- \ = ,9)1.,5 IS ;l 'cI q.../.--V 3 ~ I q .LN"t-GlL"\ 9 N I ?\c)-\t J "" l,\ i:, hf\4 4,SI:X? ...f&g ~ e6 (r;1.(1()~8J ~q at-"-I1~' r~) --f;J gG!7f?J " -,L.j-gS/f I -I-d-'~~ ~ / rz / Vf ~ I S Ot~'(\J p~ So dQ~J $'vf ~J 5 l;,,! Lj-Slx3 ?~ U&15 J~) ()IoQ/ +'?YJ9/!$ f;p1C() -M~ 10/-1 _~~_iPf~IWl*~~tJllIlU~' ..-0' -9 ('v '~7Jfld --... ..-.....-.. ~Ml-...-~ ... ....._.1-..~-1 ---.~_. a "r .. .. ~ .-......~.! . l AmH 59>'fhl . - CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OBSERVANCE OF ARBOR DAY TO BE MAY 1, 1999 WHEREAS, trees use up excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and turn it into life-giving oxygen; and WHEREAS, trees help conserve energy; that is, three properly planted trees around a home can cut air conditioning bills by ten to fifteen percent; and WHEREAS, trees turn urban "heat islands" into cool and comfortable "oasis", making the concrete jungle livable for all of us; and . . NOW, THERE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood City Council that the citizens of Shorewood are encouraged to observe Saturday, May 1, 1999 as Arbor Day by planting a tree and thereby hoping to ensure a green Shorewood and Minnesota in decades to come, ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this 26th day of April, 1999, . Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: James C, Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk #3F CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION NOTES TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1999 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. NOTES \pRAfT 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING A meeting was not called to order due to a lack of a quorum. Present: Co-chair Dallman; Commissioner Themig; Administrator Jim Burm; City Planner Brad Nielsen, Public Works Director Larry Brown . Absent: Co-chair Arnst; Commissioners Puzak, Colopoulos, Bensman and Cochran The Commissioners present invited comments from the floor, stating that there would be no official record of the meeting or action taken. Informal notes will be taken. They added that they were interested in any matters that were of concern to those in attendance. Mr. and Mrs. Bob Osha, 25840 Highway 7 asked about plans for access to their property which is on the southwest comer of Freeman Park. The current access is via the park entrance off of Highway 7, which is slated to be closed by MnlDOT. If that leaves only an access through the ballfield parking lot, it is a problem during game time. City Planner Nielsen said that the City will need to check with MnlDOT about the Highway 7 access closure policy when the access is to a single property and not to a street. He asked Mr. Osha about the placement of their driveway and if there was an easement for the driveway on . park property. Mrs. Osha said that the driveway is now positioned as it has always been. Administrator Hurm asked if the Osha's preference was direct access to Highway 7 or through the ballfield parking lot. The Osha's asked if both options allow for emergency vehicle access to their property. Planner Nielsen indicated vehicles could access their property from either direction. Commissioner Themig thanked the Osha's for attending, stating that the City desires to be good neighbors and did not intend to move forward on this matter without joint discussion. He agreed that game times would present a problem fOr residents living there. Mr. Osha asked if there are plans for a landscape buffer between the proposed parking lot and their property. Mr. Nielsen said that space.for landscaping will likely be wider than the setback requirement of 20 feet. Public Works Director Brown indicated that the City would discuss options with MnlDOT and ask about allowing an access to a single property. He added that there are plans for striping changes at Eureka Road and Highway 7, but no stoplight. Commissioner Themig stated that the City would work with property owners in this process. It Isl ,/ Park Commission Notes Tuesday, April 13, 1999 Page 2 areas of Freeman Park may also help to resolve some of the Oshas' traffic concerns. The City will maintain the streets through the parking lot and up to the driveway if it goes that way. Mr. Brown noted that a similar situation exists at the public access to Christmas Lake. Mr. Osha also brought up the problem of baseballs being hit onto his property, even during non- game times. The Park Commission will consider this in its discussion about netting for the foul ball problem. Other residents who were present at the meeting declined to make their comments until there was a quorum. Gordy Lindstrom explained the status of the Little League association with their need for a Babe Ruth field. There was some discussion of ideas for other resources. Co-chair Dallman reported that the City Council has asked to meet in joint session with the Park Commission on May 11 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss further the request to raise Park Dedication fees. The Park Commission will hold a regular meeting to cover the existing agenda on April 27. . Notes taken by Connie Bastyr Recording Secretary . , ,"'.. CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1999 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Callies called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Callies; Commissioners Collins, Anderson, Bailey , Woodruff, Turgeon and Skramstad; Planning Director Nielsen, City Engineer Larry Brown, and Council Liaison Christine Lizee . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes. March 16, 1999 Collins moved, Anderson seconded approving the Planning Commission Minutes of March 16, 1999, as presented. Motion passed 7/0. 1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING. PRELIMINARY PLAT. SHOREWOOD PONDS AppliCant: Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. Location: Northwest quadrant of Highway 7 and Eureka Road . Planning Director Nielsen presented a map of the subject property. The original proposal in 1997 was for 80 units, which was turned down. After a law suit, the accepted proposal is for 62 units. Nielsen then presented a site development plan including (15) four unit structures and (1) two unit structure. The wetland buffer has been preserved. The Staff report shows 17 conditions as a result of the lawsuit. Nielsen explained if and how the proposal complies with each of these issues. Nielsen also briefly explained some of the plans and proposals that have been brought before the Park Commission in regard to the ballfields at Freeman Park, and walking trails along Eureka Road to the wetlands at Freeman Park. The Park Commission has given some recommendations, and is still considering proposals on some issues. There are two small wetland areas that Eagle Crest proposes to fill and they propose to add wetland to another area. This will.require Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. It was noted the 62 year old age restriction has yet to be added to the protective covenants of this project. Staff has not accepted the landscape plan, as it does not meet the specifications required by Shorewood. In particular, tree preservation and the landscaping for each unit appears to be too sparse. Some of the units extend into the setback, and this needs to be addressed. \ Staff recommends that the development plans be tabled so the developers can address these issues, make changes by the April 20 meeting, and still be on schedule for the City Council. Chair Callies pointed out that the issue tonight is if this development plan is consistent with the concept plan, and asked if this development plan corrects the issues at Freeman Park. Planning Director Nielsen answered that it would depend on what the Park Commission may decide to do in regard to the changes to Freeman Park. Those changes may require the development plan to be redrawn. However, the concept plan does not address this issue, so the Planning Commission is not bound by it. Engineer Brown a~dressed the issues of drainage, sewer, and water as set forth in his written report. Brown also addressed some of the concerns regarding Freeman Park and advised that changes there may cause parking problems, with vehicles being parked directly behind, and close to, the rear yards of the plat. Also, parking along public and private roads within this project is a concern. Brown addressed the problem of fire protection, noting the water system is not . adequate for this area. The system is being looked at and alternatives are in the process of being quoted. These quotes are not available as yet. In addition, funding options are being researched. Engineer Brown discussed the Highway 7 access closures that MNDOT has specified. Staff was concerned about the amount of traffic that would be traveling on the new public road. Brown believes that closing part of Rudiman Lane is the best alternative. As part of these closures, a turning lane to Eureka Road has been proposed. Bill Gleason, representing Eagle Crest, stated that the recommendation table is agreed with. He indicated they have some adjustments that need to be made which he believes can be done by the April 13 deadline. Chair Callies opened the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m. . Katie Snyder, 5985 Eureka Road, stated that she has objected to this project for many years. Ms. Snyder indicated she is not convinced that there are enough elderly citizens of Shorewood to fill this project. Also, of the 5 or 6 sites that were considered, this one was chosen, and she does not agree with that decision. Ms. Snyder stated it is not the senior housing that she objects to, but the density. She also does not believe that this is a good site for seniors, as the ballfields are full of kids, and the streets will be full of traffic all summer. Ms. Snyder stated she foresees extreme traffic problems. Bob Osha, 25840 Highway 7, stated he is very concerned about the closure of the access road, as it seems it will cut off his driveway which is directly off that access road. Engineer Brown advised that the road will still be plowed to his driveway, even if the other end is closed. Mr. Osha asked if he can get that in writing. Planning Director Nielsen stated that he could. t . '" PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 6, 1999 . PAGE 3 Engineer Brown stated that the access road will be plowed when the City plows the parking lot, all the way to the end of Mr. Osha's driveway. Mr. Osha then stated that he agrees with Ms. Snyder's predictions on traffic problems and noted there is a problem on his side of Freeman Park with foul balls. Commissioner Turgeon asked if the foul ball problem had been brought to the attention of the Park Commission. Upon hearing a negative answer from Mr. Osha, she suggested that this be done as soon as possible, as that Commission deals with these issues. Molly Siverts, 26030 Shorewood Oaks Drive, stated she just moved to Shorewood Oaks as of October, 1998. She commented that traffic is a big problem now and she believes that the traffic problems in the future will be a nightmare. Ms. Siverts also thinks that children will be running through the subdivision a lot, and she worries about people getting hit, especially after any event at Freeman Park. Ms. Siverts asked what will happen if these units don't sell. She also inquired regarding the price ranges and whether there are a lot of seniors waiting for housing in Shorewood. Since this development has been limited to a particular class of people, Ms. Siverts indicated she is concerned about these units being sold. Ms. Siverts then touched again briefly on the traffic problems that she foresees. Bob Gleason of Eagle Crest addressed the questions regarding people buying these units. He advised the cost is estimated to be around $120,000. Also, his experience is that there are many seniors in need of housing and he is not concerned that the units will not fill. As far as traffic concerns, Mr. Gleason pointed out that most of the seniors will be retired and don't have to be on the road at peak rush hours. Mr. Gleason then addressed the parking issue and stated that parking was not an issue in past projects, as most units are occupied by a single resident or a couple with one car. Historically this has not been an issue. Commissioner Anderson asked Mr. Gleason if all people on the waiting list (approximately 30 people) for these units are Shorewood residents. Mr. Gleason replied that most are as they did not advertise anywhere else for this project. Ian Conant, 26050 Shore wood Oaks Drive, stated concerns about traffic and parking problems. Ms. Conant stated she would like the park to be changed because she sees no respect from the '" \ .~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 6, 1999 . PAGE 4 people using the parks for the surrounding property owners and she is concerned about the treatment of the seniors by these same people. Ms. Conant expressed great concern about the cost of the units and whether or not the senior housing will stay senior housing, or will be opened up to low-income families if not filled with seniors. Planning Director Nielsen stated that the covenant is for 30 years and the City is a signatory on this covenant. Therefore, it cannot be changed without City approval. John Healey, 26040 Shorewood Oaks Drive, asserted that the neighborhood will be inundated with cars from the new project and indicated he also has extreme concerns about the traffic at Freeman Park. Mr. Healey stated that he does not believe senior housing is necessary in this area and believes that this project will turn into subsidized housing. Mike Agnew, 6065 Eureka Road, asked if the water issues had been approved before the concept approval. . Engineer Brown stated that the water tower being built changed the pressure. The water tower was expected to add enough pressure to the existing system, but it did not. Mr. Agnew brought up traffic concerns and objected to the closure of the access road. Engineer Brown stated that MNDOT is insisting that the access road be closed. Mr. Agnew asked if there will be a gas main under Eureka Road. Engineer Brown stated that this is still in the beginning stages and it is not known at this time which alternatives will be the most viable. Mr. Agnew questioned whether there is a plan to widen Eureka Road. Engineer Brown stated there is no plan at this time. Keith Monjacks, 6140 Pleasant Avenue, indicated concerns about the access closure and the additional traffic that will be generated on the other side of the Eagle Crest project. Mr. Monjacks stated that he would like to see the number of units reduced to approximately 45, as it seems this amount would be better suited to the space. . Bud Koch, Murray Street, stated that he supports this project. Mr. Koch first addressed the accusations of greed that had been leveled this evening at the developers. Mr. Koch talked about all of the communities in Shorewood and the fact that these communities were built for profit. The contractors are in business and it is the goal of business to make a profit, having little to do with greed. Mr. Koch expressed concern that all the restrictions that have been placed on the project is going to drive up the price of the units. Mr. Koch stated that this project cannot be just for Shorewood, but for neighboring communities as well. He pointed out that two years ago, when meetings started, people who came were very excited and interested. In regard to the people who would be living there, Mr. Koch stated he believes a lot of them are people who built this community and wish to stay. Mr. Koch also commented that senior citizens are not looking J' . . PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 6, 1999. PAGE 5 for something for nothing, and most people are not going to be cripples who cannot drive and will be running over people. Gordon Lindstrom, 23680 McClean Road, stated that to change the configuration of the ball fields at Freeman Park, more land is needed on the east side, where Eagle Crest is building. He stated this means there would have to be 2 fewer units. Mr. Lindstrom indicated he believes that there are many advantages to this proposal that would outweigh the loss. Commissioner Anderson questioned if the Park Commission was looking at these proposals. Planning Director Nielsen responded that they are, but no action has been taken yet. Commissioner Turgeon asked if the field can be changed to a little league field so foul balls are much less of a problem. She suggested the Babe Ruth field could then be moved to another location. Mr. Lindstrom stated that the problem would still exist, it would just be moved unless more land is available. Chair Callies closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m. If the subject is tabled tonight, Planning Director Nielsen suggested re-opening the public hearing for the unresolved issues at the April 20 meeting. Commissioner Turgeon stated that Mr. Monjacks brought up a good point regarding the road going into this project being a-loop and asked if this was included in the concept stage. Planning Director Nielsen stated that it was included. Commissioner Woodruff asked if the answers from the Watershed District will be received by the April 20 meeting. Planning Director Nielsen stated probably not, but the whole proposal needs to be redone anyway if they do not approve it. Commissioner Collins addressed some of the specific comments heard from the public tonight and stated that the Park Commission and tax issues need to be taken to the correct Commission in order to affect change. Anderson moved, Turgeon seconded to table the discussion of the Preliminary Plat. Shorewood Ponds . to the April 20, 1999 Planning Co~ssion Meeting. Motion passed 6/1 (Collins opposed). .. '\ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 6, 1999 - PAGE 6 2. STUDY SESSION Land Use Natural Resources Planning Director Nielsen stated that the City Council did not discuss these two chapters yet. Chair Callies asked if the Planning Commission would have to discuss them again after the Council discussion. Council Liaison Lizee answered yes, almost certainly. Planning Director Nielsen stated that he will suggest to the City Council that the Comprehensive Plan be extended another 30 days, and move the neighborhood meetings out also until more information can be presented. Anderson moved, Collins seconded, to table discussion of the Land Use and Natural Resources chapters of the Comprehensive Plan to the April 20, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, time permitting. Motion passed 7/0. . 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none at this time. 4. DRAFT AGENDA April 20 Meeting to include: Eagle Crest follow up* Land Use and Natural Resources Discussion Recreational Structures Draft . *Commissioner Skramstad suggested a short presentation on the history of this project and a firm direction for the subjects to be discussed, before opening the public hearing. 5. REPORTS There were none at this time. 7. ADJO~NT Collins moved, Anderson seconded adjourning the meeting at 9:30 p.rn. Motion passed 7/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Kristine Kitzman Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off-Site Secretarial, Inc. .~ ( " CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128' www.state.net/shorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state,net MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 31 March 1999 RE: Shorewood Ponds (Eagle Crest) - Development Stage Plans FILE NO.: 405(99.03) BACKGROUND Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. has submitted plans for a 62-unit senior housing project called Shorewood Ponds, proposed to be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Eureka Road and State Highway 7 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). . This project was originally submitted in the summer of 1997. Staff reports relative to the proposed development include a Planner' Memorandum, dated 31 July 1997 (see Attachment I, copied in yellow), and an-Engineer's Memorandum, dated 1 August 1997 (see Attachment II, copied in yellow). A concept plan showing 80 units was ultimately denied in October of 1997. Since then, as a settlement of a lawsuit, the City Council has approved a revised concept plan containing as many as 62 units. As can be seen in the attached exhibits, the developer proposes 15 four-unit structures and one two-unit structure. The project is proposed as a planned unit development, for which the developer now requests development stage approval. The development stage plans include a preliminary plat for the property, for which a public hearing is scheduled for 6 April 1999. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER tPA-J ,< { 4. . . Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds Development Stage Plans 31 March 1999 Information relative to site characteristics and current zoning are adequately addressed in the previous staff reports (Attachments I and m. In addition the developer has submitted the following exhibits: B-1 to 3 C D E F G H I Project Summary and Narrative Existing Conditions Preliminary Plat Development Site Plan Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Preliminary Utility Plan Tree Inventory Landscape Plan Also attached for your review is the Council resolution approving the revised concept plan (Attachment III) and the Park Commission recommendation from 12 August 1997 (Attachment IV). ISSUES AND ANALYSIS A. Consistency With Concept Plan. The purpose of the development stage review is to provide specific plans upon which the final plans for the project will be based. Development stage plans must be detailed enough to show consistency with the previously approved concept plan. Conditions of the City Council's concept plan approval are contained in Attachment ill (Conclusions). Following is how the development stage plans conform to the approved concept plan: 1. The applicant states that each unit has two garage spaces, two parking spaces in the driveway, and an extra space at the end of each driveway. Although it is not addressed in the plans, the 24-foot wide private street is wide enough to accommodate parking on one side. If on-street parking is to be allowed, "no parking" signs should be posted on one side of the looped street system. Since the city street that extends from Eureka Road to Freeman Park will serve as the southerly access to the park, the City Engineer should recommend whether any parking should be allowed on the street. 2. The applicant has provided the requested additional right-of-way for Eureka Road. 3. The City Engineer has requested a possible construction easement for the upgrading of Eureka Road at Highway 7. This work is being coordinated with the upcoming road closures on Highway 7, east of the project (Le. Seamans Dove, Pleasant Avenue, Wood Drive and Lake Linden Drive). Once the new road -2- ~ ' . . ." { Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds Development Stage Plans 31 March 1999 through the project is completed. the existing southerly entrance to Freeman Park will be closed. 4. The applicant has not shown a pedestrian trail system along the southerly edge of the wetland or along Eureka Road as recommended by the Park Commission. Exhibit E should be revised to show these trails. It is strongly recommended that the trails be built as part of the initial development construction. before occupancy of any of the units abutting the trails. 5. Staff met with the Park Commission at their 9 April meeting. at which time the Commission reaffirmed their 1997 recommendations. They are considering what to do about the roadway that currently extends through Freeman Park. One option is to close off the road to vehicular traffic between the north and south parking lots (see Exhibit J). This would allow the current roadway to be used safely by pedestrians and still be available for emergency vehicle access. 6. The development stage plans have been arranged so as to avoid the required wetland buffer on the north end of the site. It should be noted that the applicant proposes to fill two small pockets of wetland that are currently located north of the Wagner home. Although there is some question as to the origin of these wetlands. the applicant proposes wetland mitigation between the large wetland on the north end of the property and his proposed drainage pond. This mitigation is subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 7. The applicant has submitted an example of protective covenants that has been used for another project. The covenants do not. however. address the 62-year old age restrictions required by Shorewood's City Code. 8. The landscape plan shown on Exhibit I is not considered to adequately buffer the project from the park. Highway 7 or Eureka Road. A new plan should be prepared by a registered landscape architect. showing significant numbers. sizes and varieties of plant materials to provide the necessary buffers. 9. The applicant's tree inventory shows existing trees on the site. However. no plan for preservation of existing trees is provided. 10. The applicant's plans include storm water run-off calculations showing how the proposed pond, located to the west of Lots 25 and 26. Block 2. has been sized. The pond design and run-off calculations are subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. 11. The applicant's landscape plan does not adequately address the protection of existing trees on the property or reforestation for the trees that will be lost due to construction. While it is assumed that several trees within the property will be -3- . . ) .. ~ Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds Development Stage Plans 31 March 1999 removed, efforts should be made to protect as many trees around the perimeter of the site as possible. The tree preservation and reforestation plan should be coordinated with the landscape plan. 12. As mentioned in 6. above, the plans provide a 35-foot buffer around the northerly wetland, and a 15-foot building setback from the buffer. The development agreement to be prepared with the final plans for the project will include language requiring the wetland buffer to be stake with permanent wetland buffer monuments. 13. The City Engineer will address water service and fire protection under separate cover. If necessary, the developer has indicated in the past that the building could be sprinkled. 14. As mentioned in 7. above, the protective covenants must include the required age restriction, consistent with the Shorewood Zoning Code. In addition, the City must be shown as a signatory to the covenants so that amendments to the covenants can not be made without the City's approval. 15. The proposed closing of the southerly entrance to Freeman Park should improve access to the Shorewood Oaks area. The existing right-turn lane on Highway 7 will now only serve Shorewood Oaks Drive. Although additional traffic will be placed on Eureka Road, it is the designated collector street for the area. The City Engineer is working on plans with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the improvement of the Eureka RoadlHighway 7 intersection. These plans . include a right-turn lane from Eureka Road to westbound Highway 7. It is also felt that the closing of Seamans Drive at Highway 7 will reduce traffic trying to circumvent Eureka Road. 16. Trail system -see 5. above. 17. Landscaping - see 8. and 11. above. It is also suggested that the proposed landscaping for ea~h unit be enhanced. What is shown on the Pl1'posed landscape plan is too sparse. B. Preliminary Plat. The development stage plans for the project include a preliminary plat, showing how the lots will be subdivided (see Exhibits D and E). Following are issues to be addressed relative to the preliminary plat. 1. The lots and units have .been arranged to comply with the setback requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code. It should be noted that unit-lots are platted somewhat larger than the buildings themselves. While this is standard for -4- '- '- Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds Development Stage Plans 31 March 1999 attached single-family homes, concerns arise where lots are platted into the required setback areas. Owners tend to believe that patios, decks and sometimes additions can be placed anywhere within their unit-lot. The applicant should either revise the plat to respect the setbacks or, as an alternative, prepare very clear deed restrictions stating that no encroachments are allowed within the required setbacks. It should be noted that patios have not been shown on the development site plan. Some of the units appear to have a very limited area for a patio (e.g. Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 2,4,8,10 and 25, Block 2). Patios should be shown on the revised development site plan. It is also recommended that the development site plan be redrawn at a scale no smaller than 1"= 50' . . 2. The wetland area should be shown as an outlot to be deeded to the City. 3. The developer must provide a conservation easement over the wetland buffer area. 4. The proposed city street and the private loop road must be named. 5. Grading, drainage and utilities will be addressed by the City Engineer under separate cover. It is recommended that the grading plan be revised to provide more extensive berms along the west, south and east sides of the site in conjunction with the landscaping referenced herein. The City Engineer should also advise. as to whether the internal utilities will be public or private. If public, easements must be included on the plat. . 6. The proposed design of the city street and the private loop road will be addressed by the City Engineer under separate cover. 7. Local sanitary sewer access charges and park dedication fees for senior housing are based on the number of single-family lots that could be created under the existing zoning of the site. This has been estimated at approximately 22. A site plan will be prepared by staff and presented at the public hearing, showing the actual number of lots that could have been achieved on the subject property. 8. Under the current City Code, fees for City water will amount to $20,000 per building on the four-unit buildings and $15,000 on the two-unit building. These fees can be assessed, in part or in full. If partially assessed, connection charges will be required with each building permit. -5- .. Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds Development Stage Plans 31 March 1999 RECOMMENDATION In reducing the number of units from 80 to 62, the overall net density of the project is now 4.2 units per 40,000 square feet (exclusive of City-designated wetland and public street right-of-way), well below the density allowed by the current Code. Although the preliminary plat is generally consistent with the approved concept plan, issues of grading, landscaping and tree preservation remain unresolved. It is therefore recommended that the development stage plans and preliminary plat be tabled to the May Planning Commission meeting. This will provide the developer time to address the issues raised herein, as well as time to obtain Watershed District approval of the proposed wetland mitigation plan and pond design. . Since tabling the application will extend the review process beyond the statutory 60 day limit, the applicant is hereby advised that the review will likely take up to 120 days. Cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Larry Brown AI Rolek Bill Gleason Fran Hagen . -6- N (3 : (3 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA iEN 62ND Sf W 1000 I o 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Feet I Exhibit A Site Location Shorewood Ponds -Development Stage WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. March 5, 1999 SHOREWOOD PONDS PROJECT SUMMARY AND NARRATIVE Shorewood, Minnesota Ref. No. 99578 PROJECT SUMMARY . PROJECT NAME Shorewood Ponds LOCATION North West Comer of Eureka Road and Highway No.7 OWNER/DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. 313 I F ern brook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Contact: John Gleason 553-2726 . SITE PLANNING. ENGINEERING Westwood Professional Service, Inc. 104 Marty Drive Buffalo, MN 55313 Contact: Ed Hasek (612) 937-5150 Fran Hagen (612)682-2587 DEVELOPMENT DATA Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: Guide Plan: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: R-IA and R-IC - Residential Landscape Nursery Residential P.U.D. - Residential Senior Housing Residential PROJECT NARRATIVE SHOREWOOO PONDS Exhibit B-1 . Applicant's Proiect Summary and NarratIve Dated 5 March 1999 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENTS~ARY Total Site Area: 19.10 acres Total Public R.O.W.: 1.23acres (including proposed) Total Units Proposed: 62 senior housing units Overall Density: 3.24 units/acre Total Hard Surface Cover: 3.01 acres Open Space; 8.96 acres -wetlands 4.36 ac. REOUESTED ACTION The action requested is for Development Stage approval of a Senior Housing Planned Unit Development under the Elderly Housing subdivision of the Zoning Code.. The Preliminary Plat is a required element of this stage of the development process. . PROJECT NARRATIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS The 19.1 acre site is currently being used as a Landscape Nursery for the cultivation of plant materials, and storage of other hard-line products. A significant portion of the tree stock has been remove from the property. SOILS/SLOPES Upland soils generally consist ofloamy soils ofihe Hamel and Le Sueur series. Slopes range from 0 to 4% across the site. The majority of the property has been cultivated for the growing of nursery stock. . Depressions and wetlands consist of soils of the GIenco and Peaty Muck series, and are typically mucky and wet. Soil borings are being completed over the upland area of the site, and the soils investigation report will be submitted to the City upon completion. VEGETATION The majority of the property's trees, both deciduous and coniferous, have been installed as screening from Highway #7, or planted as nursery stock for sale. Trees located adjacent to wetlands consist primarily of willow and boxelder species. A survey of significant trees is being completed and will be available for review by the City. WETLANDS Approximately 4.3 acres of wetlands have been delineated and field verified on the property. A Wetland Delineation Report was prepared and is attached under separate cover. Mr. Jim Hamer of the MCWD has reviewed and agreed with the wetlands assessment, and his letter of verification is forthcoming. PROJECT NARRATIVE S H 0 R E WOOD P 0 N OS Exhibit B-2 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. The project proposes the filling of two smaller wetlands of a total of 5,271 s.L The development avoids filling or disruption of the larger DNR protected wetland which encompasses approximately 4.2 acres of the northern portion of the site. The two impacted wetlands are both Type l(PEMIA). Soil mapping of the site tends to indicate that the nature and character of these wetlands has changed over time, and that it is possible that their hydrology is being impacted by run-offfrom the existing nursery's irrigation practices. This issue has been discussed and field reviewed with Mr. Jim Hafner of the MCWD, and his letter of confirmation is forthcoming. He also indicated that the subsequent mitigation of these two areas adjacent to the larger wetland to the north would represent an improvement to the wetland function on the site. . ABUTTING LAND USES Surrounding land uses include City Park to the west and north, undeveloped land and large lot single family homes to the east, and single family residential development to the south and across Highway # 7 in Chanhassen. Beyond the park to the west and north are single family homes. ACCESS Access to the property will come from Eureka Road to the east. Street A will traverse the development from east to west and provide access to Freeman Park allowing the closing of the existing park access off Highway # 7. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . This proposal is for the development of 62 Senior Housing units on approximately 19 acres of property to a gross density of3.2 units per acre. Homes will be accessed off private 16 foot drives and a private 24 foot looped street system. Benning and a planting screen will reduce the impacts of traffic on abutting streets to the east and south. Wetlands to the north will be protected by building setbacks of approximately 50 feet and the collection of storm water in a storm pond located between the wetland and the developed area of the site. All homes will have a two-car garage with two parking spaces in the driveway, and additional parking at the end of each private drive. RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME UNITS The townhbmes will range from 1,300 to 1,500 s.f. in floor area and include two bedrooms and two bathrooms. Homes will be slab-on-grade construction with no steps to provide maximum accessibility. Exterior siding will be maintenance free with aluminum windows and steel security doors. PROJECT NARRA.TIVE SHOREWOOD PONDS Exhibit B-3 . . 01999 Westwood Professional Services. Inc. .. /. /...,-/' .:.-- ..:--- -- - - -- - .-- --- - - - - " .., ..-- :t ." 'f . ~ .,. LEGEND .--~30-- OEHOlC:S EXISl1HC CONlOURS , n3.46 OEMOlC:S SPOT ELEVA 110H r:!-.. ~-: OEHOlC:S EXISl1HC STORM SEWER ;)_.~) OEHOlC:S EXJS1IHG SNUTAflY SEWER . ...",......_,rv- 0EN0lC:S EXISl1HC TREE UNE Coil 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CAL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 , . x Exhibit C Existing Conditions I ~_, ......;I! U'.JIl t"'" ~ _~ $>>I""'" 0" m. .;,1 ""'* "''' ..._t ......_ ,.... n..., I __ ... ,...-y '........,... ;.KH')ffiSU>NAl t-":.ofUf'" ........ -_ "'_ .-f ""P .~..~....r ~_"I c.;;....... .._.~ _~..;~~~~If~~ d'/O"lf SHOREWOOD PONDS (""'''''' J c~~__._~~:'-:~__ .:~I~~J. '" Westwood ........ po,~ ~... I"; 104 "ony Dn_. 'iuIt. .) ':tI.~......>>lI.\ ')': Od2.;;:~' _,... ~~''''' Nt). ~ ,"71 i. PUP_~ EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST, INC. p.0.8Oltmn M/HN1!AIOUS. WINNI!SOl'A 51441 SBOIlliWOOD. ~A I \l' TOO. 200' 30e NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ( J DATE EXISTING 3/5/99 CONDmONS Si4E~" Jr .. .'. . . . < ., " '" .; .~ ." :l: .~ ," ; } 1999 Westwood Professlo,..al Services. lnc c"" .-~.. ---'" .::0.......,_ i.." \, _'_'. -=-.. ;~~~.~~~___.____..' ".;._' "'_.-"',.....-.....~. ..,~_...,.../~./:;.:~:=~:::)--.. .........- ---... \. -. --'~ '-. ~~.."" - ',: \ $"&-9.--..-" . ! / ~.! \, ,r'",,---,, to.-; ............ -'-' ''-. '__,.__._... _.~ /' .-' . '~-,... ...... \, "-- ""'')- '~""'----:-=.' ".,-+-- FRE~"~" PARK . ""-..,-.::-- -"'<-:-~~:__''- -... ...........__.... .,,~.,.._......... _. - i ~28.Of .......~ -'. - ':',i -- .... '. '--,-- . :..._--...~~::iis'f'N I N89' --:::-- - '_"~ ^~...~ Z:-:-'::-9~:~:..:_~---'~~""" _ _,_.~ __ i ....... 9.~~' 9!,O - ; i 1-' I .-............._-,,'-.. ........ \. >-=-=,- ----- '... -... .... f .:Ji1"> \.. ........... ; 'S..' \..'- " I ' . i i '. ~ '/ .~S.. . ,...... -'~'-- \'; --" ,"'-'~" --:"'" ..])l. .-. -. f \. ;. ! '-. \ _./"- i J1_:; \ \~....~/~ ...it ../ ". .../# ~;.- ;~_.:.=~ /) "~~~:;':~ : l /1 / (i i\ i ~ ONR PROlO:ClC:O WA lER (NUMBER 27-901W) ( , >~ \\ .......... ~'.\ , , '...; ". :.,....-. ;.) '\ .. "" ". -_I ; (' i i '-~ qB(V .--.......~/.. (' ..::- I ;\i ; "{ 'l'I/,J~ ,j~~/--"\ i .,- ;--- FllEEl.IAN PARK \ x, .,/~~.>! ~..~-- - l ~----..:. z <( .3 '" a: ... i~, .\ \ ..... ',-' ~ ,/' ~ ._, ./ O' - \. ,/ . 'es.~ ...--- .~. ! \ , ~_._-; ./-'~..-s.:-.=___.. y------. /: /........ .;:, -.... ",0/ \ " \ ... t''''''- ~ r ~1:)~ '--- ,....--.-;. / .' '''\'' .' -- "---- - .~. 25 ,~.. -i---.-.- ~ . ~I.QT -.;"i~ ; ~:~;;'~. : .- 7Jty -::~ U _-G-........,:.-,::~ - __ ..I _:...~ _ - ,...- . -- <U."!>oIol~"';' 7"'~-=- _ --__...-.=? ::-. c.4ijG::-.l ~.::::;--., '. '........ .- : _ ~pj':!i _ '"- \~ - - .. r-.:.. .::::--:-- ...: _.. :::...~--- -: .... .;~ -" ---;9Q"::--='~~WA't lIC).~. ..~_.~~~~-==..::._..::_. "" STA ---.- ----t'-../ , ....-..... _. '-4:'''-''''--- .~ (f .,:' . ( - .~.),....-' ''---,.. ..,~:~.. --~=.-:~g~~~-~~--' ~ ==:":7.-:::,,~. ----. ...---.- ) '" : ',"''IlO;o . ........... .... 'r ~..."' ;. ". ...:~ ~. """..... I :.. ,-. . ~w Jlrftt~_... "'!"l~ "''; 1I.'....,..r1""H...4N(. ~.w"1 ,0"10 .~_ .~.. "'. . ..... _:.;'. '_"".";.1 Westwood ......... t>rl)l"-_Ioa 'ioirt........ !CJ,& ......" r.;-... ,;..of. }- !'Io..~'lIo'. ".. ;-;',1'.\ "" ...,: ~'VI' ~.~~-~~:- -.. --.-.':' ~'oi:;_ ,\h 5,j !~ 'oi',.:l:! ..... ......,; ~ .iiI'" .otfl ..., COMMON UIT 39 Jl Jl ~.~ /" 2.06 loC U o :g ... .. en '" "" -' CD 56 56 TYPICAL DUPLEX LOT COMMON LOT 25 77 77 ... ... 2 ... .. '" ... 77 77 '" on 4 ..... 3......... :g ... on 77 77 BLOCK 3 - TYPICAL OUAD LOT LOT NUMBER LOT UNE LOT DIMENSION BLOCK NUMBER DRIVEWAY LOT DIMENSION LOT NUMBER LOT UNE DRIVEWA Y BLOCK NUMBER fB:ll&1B) ~ OEVELOPMENT Sf AGE APPROVAl. FOR A SENIOR HOUSING ?U.D. ~OATA TOTAl. SIlO: AREA PUBUC R.O. W. EUREJ(A ROAD SmEET A aUIlOING AREA HARD SURFACE AREA (DRlVEWA'IS, ROADS) TOTAl. OPEN SPACE WEllANOS TOTAl. U"'NG UNITS GROSS DENSITY za.Hl R-IA R-IC LOr AIEJ4J 31Q(:~ r l.Jt 1 i_"r 2 Lot J '...'Jt 4- ~'Jt '5 ;..:)f 6 '-~, ..:If 3 ~ot3 ,_~t ;0 ;"ot 11 :.:.)[ ;: :''-:It ~ J t..ot 14- c-;!t ~5 ~t '6 '_Jt ;: '-or IS !.."c 19- ..ot 10 ~:~t ~r :..~t 2: '.,n 23 _,.,t :.:. ':O\tPAON LOT 2S 3lOCK2 lot i l.oct 2: Lot J Lot. ~oJt 5 ;At .; ,,-.Jf 7 :...at " :..,,~ 'j t.v~ 10 Lot " LoJr 12- -..or tJ Lot To$. L~t 15 ;.."t 16 i..;::t '7 __ot is ....::r '9 ~Qr 20 ..Q;~ .;: l..;,)t 2: l..ot 1,3 L.:l[ .:~ ~\Jt 25 1..'" 26 :...,,( J."7 L',)[ ':8 ....J~ '::9 :.."f 30 l...:t Jr I_')~J:': :..:It JJ l...rJt J-Io tAt 3S Wt }6 !.,.Jt J" i...Jt ;a '~IltA<<..~ LOT Jq LEGAL DESCRIPll0N The east 32 rods of Lot 98. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 133 Hennepin County, Minnesota. l)ling north of the north right .of way line of State Highway No.7. AND Lot 74. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 133, Hennepin County. Minnesota. AND Lot 23. MEEKERS OUTLOTS TO EXCELSIOR. Hennepin County. Minnesota. lying north of the north right of way line of State Highway No.7. OWNER I DEVELOPER EAGLE CREST NORTHv.€ST. INC. P.O. BOX 47333 M1NNEAPOUS. MN 55447 PHONE: (612) 553-2726 PLANNER / ENGINEER / SURVEYOR WESTWOOD PROFFESIONAL SREVlCES 104 MARTY DRI\IE. SUITE .3 BUFFALO. MN 55313 PHONE: (612) 682-2587 CONTACT: FRAN HAGEN. II PE ~ COMMON LOT 25 OF BLOCK 1 AND COMMON LOT 39 Of" BLOCK 2 TO BE DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE & UllUTY EASEMENT. PRJ!PAIUII) fOR EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST, me. PO. llOX .nJ) M1NNF.AJ'OUS. ~A 5$0041 Exhibit D Preliminary Plat 831.893 SF 53. 407 SF 9.J4:l SF 44.062 SF 778.-486 SF '.32'SI' '.32'SI' '.324S1' 4,324S1' '.32'SI' ',32'SI' ',32'SI' ',324SF '.276SF '.J24S1' '.324SF '.324SF '.324S1' '.324S1' '.J24SF '.J2'SI' '.324S1' ',J24S1' '.324S1' '.32'SI' '.324SF '.324S1' '.J2'SI' '.JZ4S1' 9J.JlI8SF '.J24SF ',324SF 4.324S1' 4.324S1' 4,324SF 4.324S1' '.324SF '.324S1' 4.324S1' '.J24SI' '.324S1' 4.324SF '.324SF ',324SF '.324S1' '.32451' '.324S1' ',32'SI' '.324SF '.J24SF '.324S1' '.32451' '.J24S1' '.J24S1' '.95JSI' '.95JSf 4.JZ4SF '.02OSf '.324S1' '.J2'SI' 4.J2.JSF '.324S1' '.J2.SF 4.J24$F ~.J2"'sr '.324S!' 4.n4S; '.324SF 416.I02CJ Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CAL j"in City Area 651-454--0002 ~n. Toll Free 1 -300- 252-1166 19.10 AC 1.23 AC 0.22 AC I.Of AC 2.77 AC 3.01 AC 8.96 AC 4.36 AC 62 HOWES 3.24 UNlTS/ AC , ' 14.68 AC 4.43 AC a.IAC IlI~C O.IA\; O.IAC O.1A,C O.IAC a.IAC O.IAC O.IAC O.IAC Ilt~C Q.tAC a.IAC a.l~c ilIAC o-~'AC a.IAC a.IAC a.I~C a.I~C a.IAC a.iAC \lolAC O. I At; 2.1."C' O.IAC a.l~c O.IAC O.IAC O.lAC ilIAC a.tAC a.lAC Q.IAC o.lAC O.IAC O.IAC o.tAC O.IAC a.IAC O.l~ ~.'A.C Q.l~~ i). lAC OIAC 0.14(: a.lAC a.IAC i). I"."; O.tA( O.IOC a.l.\C J.!.J.f; a.:><: v.t"\: 0......;- Q.141~ O.I~ O.t~ O.IAc:" O.IAC O.:~ v.I.\oC Z.'-\t: x ~ l -- -----' It)()" 200' ~O(i NOT FOR CONSTRUcrrON r 1 ( JATE "\ I I j/5/Qq SHOREWOOD PONDS PRELIMINARY i .'!..-\T SIIOR!:""I)OO. loIIl'INES<1T.\ i J ~ ... -l <{ u .. N~ t7'W 0_ .g. z 8 I ~o J~ W U")N i5 F 76 _<(-0 .8~ :g"j' ~ V> 2- oo:::Ce J: W ..."- ~J:5'g Q. ... '6 0 .5 . (J0~i u _S ~ .~ . t/' ';; g ;; " . e n. g ~ ~ co 01 '" .. f.......... \ I"~ '.......... ..... ...... \ \, 0 ~ ~ \ \\ 1\ ;1 0 \ ~ \\ \ - -<::,\,\L \ . - '~:\\~\ ;........ I ~~ ~\>.\ \ i ~. ~~lr. ~ \ I ., '1 \ t:-....:. 1\ \ '~\ ' :' t: I' ~.tS\\'1 ~ \ ! ,I\\) \\ I Ii ~\" f~~'-- '''j ,\'\ \: \ ,\~ \ ~ \ \~" \ !' \ I \~~ ~ \ \ \ (.J\I \ ,\ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \tJ \ I \ \; I ~/:l \ _-- _0 0\ \~ \ . \. I 0 '._,,_.. '.._0 ^ I // ., ,0- '0 ., I' / 0 r Oj~'_;- ';' I '"--''''' ~ \ \: i =nJC'~-'~'::?~~\ 'l.\\, A I (I 0 1 i\ I .. A. ~ L.__- ::::::--Jt(. I (I . (I 0 \ \ ! \ l~' ; __~~~~-:'!.__ ~. (I" \ -. .. .. ..---..........r............ ."-- ,'.;.1\ " ! . -\:-------;-\1" I ! 5)1"0 ~3~H5 \. \ ' \1 \ \ <4 .. ~ .. ;;; ~~ 11I~ !; ZB ~l.I ~~ I,. lJl ~< II: ~ ~; g::; ~ ~ !~ ~ ~L i ~ i i ,g I ~g ~n ~!! ~; i~ ...!~ ~~~~~~~' ~ ~ hu~1 ~d ~I i .U:i.x:r~b ., ~ ~ ~ a ..- j ~! ~ ~ !; 1 ZO ~u ~8 .-' _ _L : 51-:1 ~~ b :!i a .,_ . ... I --.,'- " d ~c/ o~'--,- ~ ~ ~ a. $ i-i :::- ~ \ 50< <lQ w ..J 0 (I :5' \ ~l:l 0 ",'I) ;:i5 (I II!! \ ~~ (I ...~ (I r... (I 8'r.J \ Ifi (I Clo ~~ 0 ~; 0 !! I .. .. (I .,'. "~..;_ ~'~ .-:::.: ..=~ :::.. . ~ - 1:. .' "..__ ....l I 0) (I (I /,., ----~; '"'~, I " " . . ~~ 1":.1 ...". "'--:'~;l ')" .t--~ :> z o g~ "~ z .8 8D: .. f2 i , ;r UJ ..... :? -(, Q. ~I on.. . ..J ~': Ll,J- ii;';:J a . :II ~ i ~ I' ~ ::c: tI'l u 2: !-" J'I~. 1il~5 ~~i ~ fa ~I e3 ~ ..J o ~. UJ i: '; ~ ; ~: ,,! .: ~ ' :~ ~',I -:\;' !.,t , l<'1 ' , Si! t ;r; ;1 I" , .' :? , i . Hi ,. l . ~ i ~ ........ iI, t: , !5i 11 i ' il ~ ' b " e. ' ~~ ,. i.g t;.. :~ ~ ..~-:!. t '0' 01. , .' o i!. 3: I .' ...... (; ;. ? ~ (l)l~f': Cl> J ." ';.' ::> ... :> JL' .. ~..:' ~('. ........ :r"r,Oi:" . . '" ! C'199Sf WestwOOd QI"OreS!ltO"'OI Senices. Inc. "',...::.:<'--~.", /; . . .,', \.'_r j l .' -f-' r", '" ;:i' ~._."A~"-' '. - '. , .; i \ "'. " .;) . "~\j \ . ,:,::-y -:- -.,.-_.'-..,-,-.,,,~~ -,~.. ..' ',! .3/":--;-- -- \ '. \ ". '"'~, '2> '" \\" ,of\ :"-. '.J I: ,/ (, Ai " /" ~l' ! 'r' \. ')1 -', I!<.. ~~" .. i : ;,~ I \....', "'. ~ ) J~)' f ; - '" ~ '-,."'" '. \ , t<l> -r- --,'- --'~.;......,...c---- ...}." ; \\. 0' ',;.... '-J ~-::-,-----==...;;..-":----4..,: \ '.\ ;:"'-... '--', .~Z::.:::.::::.-------~- -~~.' I /'--'_ f! ',........ //.J -~:..- =-, \, . ---t- ----::-"-...::::--..~ _ " 'j . \, .,...... "--::;-A?7;.r - --- .... \ '\ ---'t',,- I /~-:--- '-", -- ~ ----::- -"~' [' If . . 7~.,' ......- f"fW?' ~~/U~A"':--\_--_\ ;' '.t 77_; \ ~! - ;~ t ...J,r'~"';"':/ ! I /~ '~--..,' ~ '> ::~-:.~Lir" "". \ ,\ 9&9___.' l~! <' ~;,/ / 1 rlr ~ .-: {)'~ ;./ "'-- .j """:..~~- ,~,- . >---.. .~_\... '-.'9&1::- '-----=- ...:ll' ~; ---:-L-;.,L \ f7'! -.' J F"RE" ~,a. ~~..~ -=- - -~~, '.j~-:J:J. i i ~ i/", I;. \ ' . ... ;2;?-,....... l' -. \~- .............. ~~'~ "JEw ;-../~:---,ll ,,r\ ;, '//)Qo.. 1.:'" '//'l/n.'-., ..... "::.. _ _ _ .."l f\ 1'iJ . _~~.~ _ __ ' \ :.:-,x/-. ~v'/ i . .. . /~o/ : '" / ~ -.. ...... 98, '---.. : I ./ ..........:z::::::.~ /f~r71 cr /'-:1:' i ~-":~~A96'o........ ~ ...., I . ! 1.__~____ 111 :~n i' ... \ \ t;').!: ---.:: :--....-""" /.~' I ~! J 1 i I i V j -; \ 1$ · ; . "" $0>(5" I ~ II 1~~ L,"j-- p: '~ \ ',\ I i RthE I , '\--;..,/,r J 1 L:::-' . ~ ,\", \ 0/ "=,,,,.--'!. ....-. ~i' V-- '~/ " t;;,----!-; __ ?ll i 1\ .-. -- 10 d$ ~~. H1L-979:..., I. · \ \)~-/, y ~+- f \. .:.. } /....--"/' j ,\) (\ I \ It /.~. ! r;~ARY AS OEUNEA D'-' ~ '\ -ij(~ ';:'_/ 1 I \ lIElJ,AHD IotllIllA1ION ~ i '\ I V ~ i BY ~ IN1'5!fIEC 9/3/97 en ) ~. ~ \1 ' I ,.' ~ f , : r v". ~ ~ i ' . /' l f0/A I ..... \ I I~ i ( ) I _ \ \ ~ I ~ .. FREEMAN P"fiK 1 '((lj ~ ~ } I ~..:.. jlSO r~ . 1 LOr.... -15' BULDING_~J , "\ y ~-~~___ C Sl \. .' "~ ,'. FROM l'PAN!....PAj1 J I Y I' D'--- ~ r' - ) ..Y' -35 BUm:R FROlIiI ' ;0- 1 a:- ~JlptJN~ ~ J I ~ .L 0 H.i!NO. RICKSON 1 '. · I/"' TI''''-, 'CRES 1>,-~~ ,l: _ _= ~"~;~~'J I'';::~ -~- ----.. ~- ~~~-~. ~. / IIItIdlI .-7 ~...- tldl'- <#'; ~1lO ~_2t. ; :J~J::.,"t ""~j ~ · ~ I ~', ..l.) I=' FI lce:~ ~~ ~_' 8 5 p\:::3 ;.2 ~ l.r 1 I t ",9, > 20 21 -n - .:fA.. "4' .~ \~L / , j v ..0~ 'Or , .t=:' I 'U-7'~ I x ~iIIU _ J ... ,rY',:, J!" ~I:'! (~~r\i 6~ .. ~~.CWON \ ,...., I 7-' -, --~~ L.J(12~.)! ~:;.. '.A; ~;;t -r" '- ~ - ~... ~ (, geMe ~ ~"'1I';:1~~ ~!l-' '. ' 'i.::t- ~-- ~ '-, 'STRUCllON ~'H{ 1/ II I _..' F7(J~~ \\- i ... ~i . 83.41 ~. \~1 ,,>,~~__; - ?j\ ~ .J~' ~ ~~1~[.~r,,-::t~~: < ,I 2~-- !;--\:R:.:--- '11 .<J-; 1 ~r \ _ '.. ~ <?" ,-. --1' '-4fl-.9c,; ~'II, .___-----~- . ; v.. i '..{ '~.r If'. ~ ' . -, - l"'i ~ I J ~(..-~/ ~ ---, I~ !!: ' ~ ~'- .. ~< ~3 . ~dlllO)~~/ /O-~: ~(J ..11 -.. )/; ~-;~\l~I-,: ~~ :' 12 ;~'~~~.: ~.. m;~\~.! A- Jt ..;. '1''i .,,<;";./'1 ~ \ ~J- ~ ;: ~'J ~, ~; ~ -'" ~1!'I' " .~. ! I" , J ",'G - /j ~ I-- r =:, . - 8U l\, ,_, ", "__' ~ -j ! i r----t' /' / ; 0 ~. ~ u' /, 'l". . 1) , L . . 'l":' . !1. . --:::----;::: . .':".l-,! i, ....J };/.,I j ~ :. ~~ t 15 ..' . .~......Jl.'" oon' " ...---- .:y:/ ."'I~ \ ,.~ f ^:.... __ -.r.',' 1,(,-:: o~. . /_., /' ~ -' -;;{: t ....:.J ~~) . /a~...-::g::- \ ( /r-. ~ 'j . . ..... -=....J.......::::.... ,-"0:._ .,,::::. " ""'" _ --=,.-._, i jll . -7 I "'1 C' _98e~__-::::~,,:-::: L.>~/T7/~ _ .....--~a..-,~ ~.__~'~ \., ___~_.:-t .1r?,lfi :....\ ..~" ~ ~":-. -.--- ,~~ _ - - :'..r:---:::::-_ ~___...;.:::::-! ...,.'/'_ , .A....:::~~"~.~ !~~:.:-,'~- ':'-~~~3~,i"~r!1 ._-----. ~.' -;:.;::;:::::::. ..- - .. --- - - ~rn;"...-- .;... ~ ._ - : ..:..~.. - " - - -------- -...--- -'~--::"." - ------r-- __ .----_- -" i - - "'--, -- ._----=@~-~- -, (-- '--- - , ~~~c:~i~~~---"- -~-- -.-, ,--, <P- H C' J ;'.': '" ;otoI-:;O~::':::.,,~r~;;'1I:1~~.}~.:.)~ ~~~_"';:;'"j~':";:;" ':~."~'.'~,.:~ !,.....'fItft... uti.!.. In" 1.1.' .-"1 11._ :.']t... f M-~.......f.' Westwood ","t,'.U. Of.Slfl'E.C' ~! ~.i:.:_!j_.__..._ ~""Of~,.~""":,,;,, 1\.. ""'h t"""' .....'~.: t'o.oll".... ..,. :J=-_" ~ t; . , "':'1 _ :~"'l DO.... W.. il'1c......:' I."".", ./ / ./ ..- /"/ /.,// /; ~ /~-,~/ ,/-- " /::-." -- "/ //' d// / / ' +~, ~ ,/ / NOlE: ROO< CONSTRIJCllON ENlRAHCE SHOUI..O lIE A MINIWM HEIGHT Of' 1.0' AND CONTAIN MAXIMUM SIDE SLOPES Of' .: 1. IM>X=--I EROSION CONTROl NOTES' · AU. SILT FENCE AHll OlHER EROSION CON1RQ. FEA lURES SHAU. BE IN-PlACE PRIOR 10 /tHY EXCAVAllON/CONS1ll\JC'll(lN AHll SHAU. BE MAINTAINED UNllL VIAIILE 1IJRF OR CROUND CO~ HAS BEEN ESTASUSHED. ElOS1lNC SILT FENCE ON-SI1E SHAU.. BE lWNTAINED AND OR RDIO\/ED AND SHAU. BE CONSIDERED INCIllENTAl. 10 lliE GRADING CONlRACT.1T IS Of' ElCIRDIE IMPORT/tHCE 10 BE AWARE Of' CURRENT REI.D CONlll'llONS lIIIlH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL lDIPORARY PONolNG, DIKES. HAY 8Al.ES. Ere.. REQUIRED BY lliE 0lY SHAU. BE INCIllEN TAl. TO lliE GRADING CONlRACT. · AU. S'IREE'I'S D1S1\lRBED DURING MlRKING HOURS MUST BE ClEANED AT lliE END Of' EACH WORKlNC DAI', A ROO< EIfIRANl:E TO lliE SITE lIUST BE PROVlOED ACCOROINC 10 DETAILS 10 REDUCE TRACICINC Of' DIRT ONTO PU8UC STREETS. Call 4-8 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 .lAn. TOil Free 1-800-252-1166 EXTRA SlRENGlli FlL lER F AeRlC TYPE II - ADO Vo1RE MESH BAQ(JNG TYPE 'I - ADO 'MRE MESH AND HAl' BALES SlEa OR WOOD POST PONOING HEIGHT FlL lER FABRlC. ATTACH SECURaY 10 UPSTREAM SIDE Of' POST. RUNOFF' 9" MAX. r RECOMMENDED STORAGE HEIGHT I PONDING HEIGHT ~ ."16" TRENCi lIIIlH COMPAC1ED IlACKFU. STANDARD DETAIl lRENCi 'Mlli NAl1\E BACKFIU. ALTERNATE OETAIl TRENCi 'Mlli CRA VEl.. NOTE: 1. INSPECT /tHO REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACi SlllRII E'SfT AND REWO\IE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 2. REtoIO..e> SEDIMENT SHAU.. BE DEPOSIlED 10 /tH AREA 1HA T WII.l. NOT CONTRl8UTE SEDIIIDIT OFF-SI1E AND CAN BE ( PERlIANEN1l.Y STABlUZEO. 3. SLT FENCE SHALl. BE PlACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS 10 MAlCIMIZE PONOING EmaENCY. . SIlT F!NCE LEGEND DENOTES SILT FENCE -980- DENOTES ElOsnNC CONTOURS -OlIO- DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES GRADE BREAK AREAS ZJ.46 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ElEVAllON AT ,/- SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OlliER'MSE NOlED ::r-......,:: DENOTES ElOsnNC STORM SE~ -~- DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER -..--~/-""'" DENOTES EXlsnNG TREE UNE rY'Y'-r'rv"I DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAl. UMITS ~ EXlsnNC M::llAND BASINS. TO BE FlLLED Ed PROPOSED WEllAND MIllCA llON o EXlSllNG WEllANO BASIN TO REMAIN ~i~a M::1l.ANO BUm:R X Exhibit F . Preliminary Gradinl. Draina~e and EroSIOn Control I'ItIII'AIlBDl'UR EAGLE CREST NORTI-lWEST, INC. r.o.lIOx on)} hllNNliAIOU.S. NINNIlSoTA :1_7 C' 100' 200' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION : .Iv', PRELIMINARY GRADING. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONlROL PLAN DATE 3/5/99 SHOREWOOD PONDS SBOREWOOD. /ollNNI;SOH SHEE7 5 Of 6 . . ,; c 1 999 . Westwoorl P"otesaionot Services. Inc. " C"'''''''''' ,\ , ! '/ '~I p~' 'I t i' ! I ff !I I JJl :JlI ,~rlq ,... ---....>> PRAIRIE "iE',' III~=- ----c l 111 ~I // ll~ ~/ \ 11../ \ )~ ~~ ~_~7 I,ll' NEW IE SW-972.~ . EX IE N~972.25 HENC,PICKSON ACRES ~- -/ I ! f i / ,) /- ........... '-', " ". '\'" " ...... ',......., '\,'., -, ~ , . -'<<~'~-~=~~~===-:~" ~ -'-. ~! .---- ".- -'-'"- -- ..---. - - --"" i -.-' Ii ~~ .'.... '--:':'-~';7-'-:.=:-=-- / . / ./ . ~/ ~! V~i--l ! '''---.' -.-'- --- \ . .-....- --.. __-. -i . i.--.... -:;::::::.,- -' ;; ~ i \, \ \.. . \ '.~ ~ . SURWOOO COURT .~ .; \ , i i \ i , f '\ r-- I I \ l r i r'- .... : -''4--1 "- " . \ \ .. \" " ...... '~ I / / I I I < ::s \oJ \oJ e: VALVE (TYP,) .., II In It' , : \ ! i i I --'--;-~'\\~<',~"u"i #~~~ ~ --.~-~~ -- ~ ~ 1 . IIH-S I +. RE=9lI5.SO I ~ S' IE s.m. ~ S" IE E-fl7L5 i1i I I Ij ///' .... SAN SE\IIER $TU8 II : ~ ::.- --::- ~- - y-- 7 -= __ ---:1 __.:::- -:=- --- ~98 _ .-:- _ ~ _ --:::-=.._ _ .' IE .........--- - - _ -:;::-=..~_- _ I " _ - E-978~ _ "::-:::=-..:=:-_ _ - __ ~_ t J 1-- -- _- -- - __ -=- =-== _-= - -" ~WA't NO. 7 _'__ -I " -- - __ -:-:::...=:;- - .... sTAtE HIGtI _ _ ----.... - ---- ----- ~-- ..... . . --- _ -r- ,_:~-''--- _ _ ____ .. ~ ~_ ._ _ -- --+ --. - ---- - ~-~-~.-.--- \ .----- -' - .----- -" /-. - --- ~ _.~-:.~ --~ -:..--~=- --- ---- -- J '" , '\...,. e.-t"" UII.It fftfoJ .,..... ~.. ....., "'''' 'ft. .JI UNJ.t ...... .....ec, ~ ~ th..at I.... <olI""'" .e.psr.."", ~fS.'ih'oM"'" ENCINEER \,IndooJ t...",.. (Of ,,.,. ";..1-., ~., -"'-""0 Westwood ........ ~ ~ '''0::: !f)t IIIorh-ano.... ;...Ie J ~tt;n. "'.. _ ~~I ~ ";1:." ~:!-;"S8' .11t.:l!.fi' ~fSIQ.ED VNi. II ..:.~I.- ----- -. '-.,---- -.. ---...----.. DAfE ~...._~ R[,-~, NO 117!6 (>JIA'" ~ _.0...----:-... 1tf-:'oH(or"A>....,...I:t'f."..." .- .... OF PlUG AT END OF .... WA lER SER\IICE 1-1/2" CURllSlOP at BOX 0 PL S' P'IC a.EANOOT S' P'IC SANITARY SE'I€R .... OF WATERMAIN 1-1/2" COPPER WA lER SER\IICE .... P'IC SANITARY SE'I€R .... GAlE VN..VE. t(' SANITARY SE'I€R S' WA lERMAIN ruPAUDfOIl EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST, INC. p.o.1IOX47Jn -.uous. WIMNIlSOfA SS44'7 Call 4-8 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CA; Twin City Areo 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 , ' LEGEND ~ SANITARY SE'I€R - <l - WAlER -i- H'lD. WfVN..VE ., sroRM SE'I€R - << - PROPOSED S' SANITARY SDal-"- 6" SANITARY SDal--- S"a: s' WAlERMAIN -1- 4- WATERMAlN -"-"_1- H'lD. W/VN..VE . STORM SEM:R - ~ - x TYPICAL TOWNHOME SANITARY SEWER & WA'TERMAIN ! ! Exhibit G Preliminarv Utilitv Plan I a" 100. :CI) .~cc NOT FOR CONSTRUCTlON SHOREWOOD PONDS [ PRELIMlNARY UTILITY PLAN JI r!;:~ . l~ c)F 5 SIIOIlBWOOD. WIMGi$OTA .. //, ,16.5' SUFfER FROM /'''J WETlAND BOUNDARY :~: ',; [ "". .....! .l1Xl.'~ l1J~ . ,J ''''I.~.."" JlJ~&, /, . ..' ".> \.--" /; 4'!V' ."" !~ ... ~1 01 ~ - ~~ --- I I I I i f ~. ~'" ).~,:,.. , ~..-' (i ";::'>x.' . " ' \ , " o ~ - .- - .- . --. ~.:..~~~?7%~;.:~~':~~"",~~~"-' - , / r/-~~' "/, '."..'7--. ': - . .:" '. W' ,(/'//// . , " ~ ~>;;!.?,'/ . "'. '. _. -"': / ~.....,.~.. - , . ; '/ /?~' " '. ~y~' ~REEMAN P"RK .. ,..~<~:.j:?:._/.,...> ;V.~ ' ~///.,,:- .// ,//.' /;'-. t';/.,/ "'" 528.01 N89016'S5~//~../.../T'.. /" .' .... - -' ".~(-; ~""/ - . A L;-~./; .~/>~.; t--,A ~/ i ~ '\\ c:! '71 i; t.. ~, " I '. J . ~- ,..-- ',. ,',.,.")",.. \:..- 1 /~ ...-' I I I . / <<-; ,t~. , . / . "':.- ........~....../. ,,'/ '"",' " ^ . / . . '. ).~ ~. ~-- E= '. .U ) "" .....,'-........ I ~_" /'~'-'f- ~-- . j all/1 ~~ " b -1/,';-, -_.~-_.! --1j, ~ I ~-G, r f~ f~L\"----=F \J~ .1 i\~ ~ :=c~ c .::::"-.-- - - ,-e-.=:::---,---~.- ONR PROlECTED WATER (NUMBER 27-901W) \;';.->\ .. / ^ ,/... \ '(,.;> .' .,'/1 ~;.~..<.. / ~. - J /7""/ (.7 :,:." ,-oH"'-" -~~>><.,z:/%.~)'/;~" , . _' .y.'/" 'Jtll4..(.///'.-s)J/,":>. /f~/~/ / · -_." / /..-' /~. )~:,;/:/? . '<.A;,;/, ..:/>~#. ."'2 ".'4.- :.'J ,WETlAND BOUNDARY "'S DEUNEA I BY BRAUN INTERTEC 9/3/97. ( ?- ... iJ'l ;;... 'N .. :8 ,Z ."'1 FREEMAN PARk .. \ . '".":1".'~'" ;.. .-1 / ,. .'/ "! .,"..... ;15' SUFFER FROM WETlAND SOUNDARY ill> .",! .'"' ."" W IN ,... ~ --:;2.--;- .~. ~~~ ~ .3110 .'''' .~:7 .- 11.' . .~t* .- "> .~ Q.,-.& .... ;,.".;'..r ...... .\'7 "",.'3102 Q')~ f.! ".. 8.3'''. "4' '. .,t. .Jt" 3"7 ",. ,I, - . ,,' ,.3142 ,. . U~ -'Wii. ~ ..... .31'" .... - ~,."'" '- ... ~ ~ ~~~ ~_~ i ;&! 14. -- ~ ~ ~~ 'I' ~. : '..w ~, .r1~:..JIUFFER 'l':lf<iM ~_ -.. ~.~ '!: _~i_~/i~llAHO 80UNDARY - - ~ l'W/~'--" './,:;.-1 'f, __ 8:z"'36'02-E, .-f'.z., ,......j / ..:-;' ~,. -- - ,_ 843.54 II "'-:5"~= '~,.:../ -.."":1. _ _--- .-., l4lllH!'A't~ _ - . l!!i~~--- _ - .- - - -------- --- ---~ - -:--.-==--=-= ~--:-.~--- - .---. ;~ -'-:- ; - ~&~.ts - - - - - -- - - - '" ... \JJ - - - - - 5. ~ '" .. ... .:. ;., r -.-;: l .. .. 1:W Westwood ...... ~ ~... Me 104 ....,. Oriw. Suh J hIt_ IIlIN "",'3 '12 6I2-Z:5I7 llOKi>l[D cor.... ~--. ...... PR!t.'RtE VIEw "1J~ATES I I I ~.. ~. ; I '--- I i .r,1 "'ENORtCkSON "'CPES Ii Ur" ,i '- -- - LS LS CMEl:>to "feortD OR....... 81 J'f)I.1'( - LEGEND t.NQ, :lI ~les '0 30 _ 'uce ,. 0 . e. D 30 e. C 6 , 9 0 . . ,. . . , e 1~' I ...e. ,. ue . t.N ... ~'e I ,10 ...!., .9 3104 As' 8 . 1 I As.~ 1u. I 106 At.. 31 .' ~10 ''''5'" '9 Asr ",'" 11 "',r 1~1 . .S:-. 10 11 A,S'I" 10 311 As" 11 114 4sr. 1 11.... .. r 14 116 u e 4 ". 0 ~ ., 11 ! l' 119 e 31 OS! 21 ...1 1 A r. 1 ') tn': 10 1. As:-. 1 31 4 AS!" 1 1fT': I 1 I". 11 t.. 7 0 t 1 .... 1 . 1 O' 1 1 Cl!O ~ 1 . . 1 C. oar , II. As.., 1 W 14!' 1 A ~ 1 1 8 . 10 19 Wole 0 , II. 14'1 "'It.. 141 4,,, 1 ,,14" i M It! 1 143 t M ~ t I 3144 I W Ie :0 ,. M.e 1 Ai" 8 14 A,~, 9 '14 t" r: 9 149 ASf'; 8 o " 1fT'. ,t"~ 1 " . 1" 9 ce ' .... . S ruee e. 's' .., ., r 1 90 . C '0 096 ..... . 9, 6 e A.,. ",. 9 , 0 .sf': 9 1 I A r '10 , 1 A I' _ ""... 'sh os: SITE LOC,t.11ON ~ ~~~.,; ~~o: ~-l!<3ar ,14~ 1 6 I W If I 1 i It'll! 15 If"! t Pme o "'. 161 Ine 1 "'. 16 ."" 6 164 .". I 4- " itl~ .,..~ .. , I. ~ I~I Pine ,~ 16. '"f- 160 .170 I"'!' _, 1 WI 1 .. j 1 inti! _,. In 175 olne 1 I In~ 'E , '" 1 e I If"! 1 I Info e I _ t i"'rn~ :. 181 In- : 4 31'" PInE 18 'ne ....184 In 1 I"e 1 Pin~ f8. ine 31 ~ine 3189 Info 1 Pine 8 191 1M '9 1 ""tI! 9 i 319.3 lIne ; i; 1 194 I ~I"e .3 195 Ine '5 1% U Ie 319i f O!' 1 I"f i 1 Fin!' 2 '" .3 01 Pine "'0 me i :3~O~ i w:~~; ; ~ " '6 .. 6 4 ~6 '8 .6 16 I' '0 o 10.0 61 :I f ; I ! GRAPHIC SCALE ... . ~..; i ~ ~ (III P'IZI') 1_ - 100 ft. PIUll'ARI!D fOR EAGLE CREST NQRTIiWEST, INC. P.O. BOX 47333 MINN2.<U'OLlS, ~^ '5447 ( ) DATE TREE INVENTORY 3/fJ199 SHOREWOOD PONDS SHEET SURVEY 1 0" SIlOlU!WOOO. MlNNJ::S(YT A 99576 9~i8b$' SG , .. , , \ _' ~""'" oJVt ~"'....,..""-t., \ , ;;1:. --~ /~ic.~. ~ t-l'J_. ~:.. ~~~'t-Nt. I, ~..~. (. . .--.-'- (T' ,-~.. , ~,.N\. ,,-. .." \ ~ . . ) ~~,.'<_.. ~"". ..~~~ -y.." ........ " V'" 'V c:. ~. \.;""'-",..,;- ~. .....-- J., ~ \"'c,;: ; ,----.---- -^- \ ! V ',,< .' . -"J- . '\^"" -r /""', .......r: -^'.~ ;.-, i t:: .: \ ,"", c--. I --1 (i : 'I '..r... ...-...0-, [. L IN' \ .~~';i- I' \ \ \ '\ Cl.J it \. <~ . --."" [c3T. i\--r-''"L., ~. I r-T . I ,)c:. L1r1rr \ r I U~-' ~ \ \ i '-...I ry' ! I ~ i ' ! \ I i I '\ _ ~~L... ., i..:~ L--,J I, ,I, \.ff.."ZC. !l+ '1-----l-----~, \ I, \ ..I,,", ) \ I II !. '--' I , 1........__.... \ ; i ,.-1' --.. I 1" \ ' ' i \. l' :-"". \-1' ~ U.JJ\ \l0 ,-- \ ~ "':W ~ \, \ \ i _ r=:j i i i I \i\~!-' L--, "':'! \~ \r' 1\ CjI,\1 W liCI \0\;~} c r;:.-----d. "'1 .~. i \ \ h \ L, .-J I. . ,~ \ \" ),~' \ ~ \ \ \--J---L..J ! ;~~1 "'/'- I I -' l V . \ ,:\ ' .....,.....-l~.. f'll ~-,-)\ \ I-\--LJ _\ I, \ \ ~\ 3:\ i II' "~I _~ ~--...!.,~) / '\___' I --'!, .t';, ". : j~..., ....... ..-J--"! . ( .-1;--' .-;:....:.::-. '':/'...X " ... " :. ,. .,......, ,--. --~, .., \ .t--..-'- i \ '.. ; .\ ---- ."'~';"--- ~-" ,'., -- \ .~\ -~~-}-'0 rj [):\!,', \'''-'~fG~-~--\-\1~' "\ t'~~) ,-"'- ~ :~" ,,"- ('\ L- \. t \ \_.__J"'.... \ '-. \ \ \ , \ .~ ~ ',' ! I ': ~ '\ "'" r\ 'I~" "\ ~ \ \ .~,.: " ~,. ,> -- ~ ~X~ /, /~. \ r-\Sl.....J ~ C. G _J '. _ _~-\ tt\. \:~(~) 85 \L.' \ .~' ,..~,.C- '--i \-"l! \,.\ \ \ f '\ r-'! .-..... ,---.--, U \ \ \ } \ ':-. .......-"'1 \ i \ '\- I....'-l;- \ \, '-i "~' \J---\ I' \ \ n \. \ ' , '" -~.J \ \---1..-l..J ~\ \ '; \ L, \ \' r~-\ i \ L----"""\ \",' L '--' I._.-l \ \ \ ~: (' ',. i "-L---' \ '; ~ \. 1 ? ,_,-,---;--'- l '1\ \~. r r~'--\\! E-.,~..-J ~\\ ClS i.\ : \ -.. \ ,.\-, \ ! ....'1'-.. '-'. \' \ ..-.-' ~ L-, \.----.. ) ~ (, ',- '.' '" "'< i \ r '--:---,\: \ !:.\\ i ~ ' j L----' \ \ - '\ \ \" L..""'\ \' ~ _ (t,) .-"1-- \~~:+. \ '{' ......J o..--"\~\ <...r~-:.. --, rn ~L..J j \ ,I....r /-- : J----~-- \_' ~, "--" \ 1 \ ~-r-:. \ ~I ~~.. ,.'..J-----4 ' q ...LU< L......, \ \ .~.. \ \ '; ~'\ -\---- " l: \"-' IUrl-<VJ r'1>'.r\\~U). j\ n -1.,' "~I ,(i--.I/I J... \ !' \ \ \' ."",\.' \. \. \.~. ----\., 1 ,'.f 'J (.\ .~ r \ n-..-l : \; -.. ~ ~/ \ U \ r ' 'I' \ I, ~L. l..-, \ \ i ',..r---" ;-- -- . ~ ~ . ....v... \-.--l. o__.}-_ ) / 'J _ ... \----~.\--_._--\ ,~-~,\, \):~''-. '. ~\ ~~ ~~.r:..G-~--'-~ /I/-~/ :;.\ ~. (1~\ r <.~<~ \l--.', \' \ \ \~\~.. ~)~:) , \ L- \, \ ......--- ~ \ ......., ~ \ '- ( .--;;::-- ...-/ .4.- L.--i \ ; ............ \ ~ \ ----~-.- '\ ) ; '-----=- ~\ \ \ \ r::O- ';.:, :r .r~ C CJ \ \ (\J / ......----:\------ \ -:>\ - "'-, ..~, \ '\\ ~~U:~' \ ~'l ^~ -5 GJ\:3<~ 1"~"1 ~ . '......., '\ \___----\---- \~ ~_\< \',.:x.l ~ : \ ~~'> \ :\\ ( ..., ~-', ~ X0" \ \--\'\ ( \ f-.--' \~" \\,..--"" \, ~. \, \ ~ ~ "'f\1'" \ I ..., .: 6 ;....--' \ \..- ( ~:y " '. ".?.J ..... \ , -1 --' -----' ---. '\ '----"\ ~ - '\ /'ii -'< ,...J~ " { {?Z.. r- '/<'"1 \ ----- \ ~\ \\ ~ ---' ~ ) r- Q\ ~ KV L-'J\ L t1-":.Jtl.. ~\ \ ~'\ \-J~ ~~.. / \, L '~.; '~....,-~ 3f: ~~_,.. _....- t:-~J _~__~," I \ ,.......- \.... 1 __-...... 'ft:..I ~ I..II'lrr ....- \....-__ ..- . ,J- \ ----- ..f ~~ \ '. . '-l>-v- i r -...___' --.- - ~- 'V" Vv-v-...~._"'__"'~._..'_'''''',..v..............~.v-..,r_v-__~......._~. I \ /,,--.i - 'c.l. \, .. ___.__.~. 1 L::..-..- ~ _....---~. - - - .__...~ --- \ ~ ~ i L l! J ~ J Ii! 1---- .--..--+........- ....-. --~ I I I I I I I r . \ Cc-~ ~1 ': j I '[ ,~-<J- l'TurPl "",; : '-'Jt;"D e,.4~l- _I__.._____L______.__ -'r!1:> V61wrr;.';; ., 111Z""'5 i 1 eHlL7n\;J;"-t 7 j I // \ ,,/" I ;' / / I I /1 11'P ()";I-r" (~Ij,'", "1Al v...~ ) ,.;cr 1'0 ~ e J~7 Orr 6,-zJ;> VA~"I A U 2. zok. L.t 7'17J;-U:"': ~'.J7.;t;J,/ ''''-;''/A Cazr...tr ,,,,:; /...mW-Q+F f3 21 2-1'/z.' I&D MA~ . Ac.c~ f2u&L4n .. (,- E5 EiVf:Jl- B//U.H ' o..T"If.J't ;./It#U'I , u....rr'P fo,1..M c.. 1 D ~ ;2- ~fz' 6u-rr ~ 'F/Z.Jf)(.'M<~ R-~"'LV"'WJCI'I; :x.,,,,..,,r ,.- /6 5-",' ~ J.I,~.5~ PJet,,; ~~ z::i,',J5..l!'."-" C F .,. S(". ~"'~u; ''P~ 'R.,~ ~.- "'" e;. ~ S"'-b' k),-tl~ 'p,"'F .~~ ~~. H 6 '/~. IIMw/f.... /1A;ur "~A-6JNI.-'4"'" . c...,,-r;< :;,V1 J; S /'/z' !;nJJ.4 ~ u...e ' }>1;,f.L<~;. ~T4 >.ov.) .:r S" I';' " 4D~u.~ ~ "M"u.c~: li!eb .5FU:...'ZWL 18' t;o T.vIQ I;:a..WA-"C .~ 814;"''1' " j:... -'10 L. 3S'" /5" hu..',,,,}~ Vi5-"~w' "lju;jJ~Nu"" A"'Tl'l-r...,...,." /'1 31 15-18' A,VJ. >,ct<t>r "6p,,,/do '" A. \0 N 31 1~/6' W t..1W. Gu.~'1 ,. V'&/"""'''l Q.~~ '/Ii.JwA' C 93 .s"'&'A'- ~A-~I~ ....\u...~~ ~"1\lA AQ.c"'1>'''' P 7~ ~<M... ~""blA- ~,~ -~"It'dU!> ~,j,)", ~"'~,... l......__._....._..;.-.~.~.... E.l,lU~ R.cA'D I"~ SQ' 11,-,- ~~t;) 1'/U:1'K 7C '8" 1tzr;l~TLi.'). A~ R.t...7S "'~ '1'0 :!;o I'I1J!.T'&:vAI.-/"'f' ~T:;f:c,~"'" -~, ~ HO~:~"" ft;.A.JtX:;, bl-t!A:t...x>Ce; riA./" Exhibit I Landscape Plan Fcil' t"atC, Gu~ IV i",.,,:. ]:,_,< , 11..1....l)<.I7',.... riN 6)" &t.A"t'" ~.Jar.;t1+f.~ '-.....,':>~.cA..~.Io; :t".. 'Col< 'lz.<t, A/o.1otJ'o-. MN 5C20'3 . ~ ~/J/.J) J.J.-,1 i lit. I I (II~ = c 1/ ffI~~JJ ( (' I] ) t 0~ N Ii.. ~ )~]0-)\) 2 tIP; \ 1\'(\\\\ ~ ~<'-- -d.:-----) ,/ tl ,+ I + i I.~~J > ~' c{ ~. ~\ \ ~l i \ ~ "!L: ~' .~ \ I i\\\\ ~ . --\-::------ f \ /. I I ,. I~ ~)I~ I '7"""--: ~ - \ : =~, _ :~ I ,\: \1'\ ------- ...- / ' ~ F , ~ ~ -... \ I : ~.o \"1 I · r >=! !~;, I -rr\ilh ".. N ,__-4-)1) / } 7 .. .,.v.~'>^"! ~I'-..:: __ \l .==. iL~!" f=i rt ~.i\ _@)"i.Iii!.J. \l\~\\\, ~: ~ Vi ';/ / -a ~ ; ~.. : i ~ ~ 1i -,.,. 1 ~ I \ \, = . ca : \ I~ ~.. Q/ ~I Ilv ( 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill - f. -h\4'1 7r ~,~.1- ~\\ ~I "\ ll~\\~ ~I ~7 :/: ~ 1J- "/-" ,;1 r~;~ ~ ;.1-"';4\\ ~ i\ i i'~!~ ./ ~ I.~ ~, 7 1 ( r I." v " . v i1::. \ \...-J. \ ____ ..,~ ..' ..: '. '" i ~ I' iJ; 1\ \ \I~' \- / r '>~ ~ t/1.-,; .-"- --71)~ . "\:. rL-1f?; t'-~,;,;\!':< :,~:t"::&~.~ \';- ~.t,\ >~ ~~ ! \ ~ul\\ ~ ! ~ ~ '.f'JIJ'I~\ 1,,1.. -- -I .. ~ r-~,c_.,. .'"if~i;;"~_R'~~~~\ '" - \ ; l-=-\ / '/ f/ . -' ".""~"'" ~ --.. ~ J.\~." ~ I I I /7 I/c /:2 I 1 ., ./ L (j ce . -. ~ ' , 1\ _~ V ( = ~ {-. X : -::: ( ~ -:' . - r r:- ' ...J- . X"7 f-r- ~~ '"' .. ' ~\ I\..+ -i ~ + h . W::~..\ .-i~" \ - -~~ ri-"~ ~ 1 ~I '\ '. .\\ \ \ I __-_,_~~I ~~\\\~~" 'I !J '\ "If \ ~. .' \ ~"\ \,+TI= rrtt l""t ~-T ) r- :: I t ~~ .; .f .~-t:!""':';~ -- .... ~\~ \If;\ 'JIb \ -i .~ .~ .":\. \.=cr \~"\I ~ . r / l~;'..'{ :.~: r-: '& ~ ~ \ I (1 T ~ r _ "\&~~\ ~ ,." '.", . ,~.," ,_...;::;.~,~ . ..;..... 1....., I j... -./ " \ . . /. ~ ~..:. ~ -::""::1 J . it ~ \ \ . ~ ~ ?''' '\. ~~ ---, ~ ..,.., / - r-:: 0 il\' ~~\ / I ,," j- . /--:;:.~- ~ - '... . . .l\'" ': - ~\ L' ~ - '\.. "-J \ ~ ~ · r ~f11IIII\~ J.:! ~. .-f)V....;'/ - '~..~-.~.-., -~"'" ~~ ':.. ,~ro5.~. ~~~ \ - tJ . \~ \~. ~ L ~.~ ~ .~ \; .~ ~~t:?)~ :,{,~/: GPt~~~ ". ~. ,.~:..' _.'.'-: "! r- I_~ - ",... ~\ \ ~z', -..-f-ill-" o :r.f! I / . '. :....~' :.r/1"'-V'i .' r " ~.. ........ -"! t:- l:;f\~ / / ,,= ~." ~.:;;,~. :'~.~j ~- 5\" C ~.;.~ ,I o 0 ;(i~:.,; /(. "'J" _- )~. ''- ,t-..;,' ~_, _ , --- -~_ ~ lOr 1- ,rC) t)\:;~\! L/~' ~~ro-:-~- _,,\\i~,:-7;~W~~~ "'v. +r'~ .' _.(~. ~~:. J. .lAtl.J)J~ ~l* 11,.~ .. .._::.. ~ .:~ \~ . o ~..:.., . ~..~- 0 '"'". , 'I ~ " ""'" 0- 'i .. '\ \ ~ II~ . "~~'t ~c;;;:';. :"'-' - ~'''~''':'';~ e'':'~-'''''';::'':S;:f ^ -..,~ ~ ~-- -.' ,- I f..;..J " .... ,. '~'-.~ -'. '~~",. ~~ ~~1"'!:~ ~. . ~ -. ~ .~-, ~ . .~ -. ......... -.... _..;S:.~, - ....;... _.' '. _ . ~cf .. + "-~~-~~~-:':':~.~-i:'-.;'-:--~-, ~...., i I "::-'~::~ .-- ,~~= .. r- --~-_ ~.:,\' 1"0 ~ ~ t) , \01 I Qt;) C=::--i-::.,..;:::': "I I 'of- !';" ~~ . ~- 0 0 -~~.,.-- :: .!~" . 'oJ ~ 0 \ ;'1 . .....~..;..:..::::-~. 0 )1 ,,:~ """-~~''-':''''''''''I''\ ~ 0 - -' . ~.'. . '0:-... ~ :: ~ t"\ 1J. ~, ~ I:) 0 .~'-.~':;':~'-i 0 ... Ii: """~:' ~;':. - ~'''- ~~.'" ....,~ l..... ,/ I . I ~ \..;:. ~ :: C ~ W ~/ '_r\:!~ I ~=.:...:-:~ . tV =~~~\--","", ';'''_-...~~-t_~ .~f$j~~~ .. \ \ -- . _c ......... ;; .. .,: 0./' ~,~ 0 .;:tl:::::~~' . \ ~~ '. . .... '. . ~~St: ... ,,~~s--..;,~.~.' : \ '-J 1~;"I~T~ I .,~. " .. ,,~ \ \ ;. ("\) <.:::~ 'I:) \"s ::;.......:~ '''-'.. - "I-':~."". ...:-.'\......~........~...~. ........\'t...-..~......:..... '''. "' "~.~..''''.'''~'' .\' ->)~ _ '.) l ;/,,2 'V"~ :'\ ,/' ',/ ':;':~C"\.i,. - -l i.~tk~;!f;-:',,-',~'S' .~":..:....,,~~ <(" -r- ~;;o _\ 0" O~ I ""-... \\'\ ~ / ' /.. ..... r.~" .. .'J.,J>!.,1,. .... 3.......... ....~,'.~ ~....,.' at [ r~ 0 "001 U [..... .tt /7l / (II \0 ~~. ~-.~~...",. ~. ~ \ /~1~\;~"'\).~l:C'.~..~....;:~.,,~~-f'~ ~. . - . \, ~ ~" .(J \-Jl~tt// ~ ,/l0'~)N --. ,~~~ ?~.~~~;..t ---II i i I~.:"~~~;"';~ ~.~.~.,:,: '., '. ,,~.~' -" ~,-' I. 0\,\ ~t.." Q ..~.:...-;.. f! / .... I"" -----,.00:..... ,.... ( " " II I :'" .. .'1: ''f{,\\'';, . "~I . "" -~ I:) v' / ; " I 0 0 0 :, I -r:;-.>.:'7-','~... · ":'~.'';l>i.'''.' '..~' \"~.'~~~.~'~~' ) . ~~.' ~ ~r \" "11' r,'''' .r. if ^ 0 t = J ~:;?.e-~~ ....; "~I IJ';- ~~" (.... ~ ~~~. O,l\~. ,/ ~\ 0 ~b ...;:- I " ~~~ .. P!1}!' ..,,' · n -~ 0 Q!.~ ~\ : /,/. I:l ' \ T-' .'..... '-- ~ /~ 1.' ~) ~ \. ! i - .. .!x i c - .. i. = x ~ '\ ""'~\ . ):~ ~ ) 1 / S' i~.' rf~ I~~oo \ )'~f\ \~ ~ · ~ '~i.~~~) ~2 -: 2~':~ ==:,arkCUculationandPar~n2 . '~~8 ___ y~_~ J , I MEMORANDUM . TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: BACKGROUND CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Tom Dahlberg COUNCIL Krist! Stover Jennifer McCarty Jerry O'Neill John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD. · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen 31 July 1997 Eaglecrest Northwest - Shorewood Senior Housing - Concept Plan 405 (97.20) Eaglecrest Northwest, a development company located in Plymouth, has submitted plans for an 80-unit senior housing project to be located on approximately 19 acres of land in the northwest quadrant of Eureka Road and State Highway 7 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The applicant has requested a conditional use permit and concept stage approval for a planned unit development (p.U.D.), pursuant to Section 1201.03 Subd. 20 of the Shorewood City Code. . The subject property consists of three parcels of land which arespfit between the R-IA and R-IC, Single-Family Residential zoning districts. The westernmost parcel is occupied by the home of Ai and Shirley Wagner..The center parcel is currently occupied by the Lan-Dc-Con tree nursery, and the easterly parcel is presently vacant.. Land use and zoning surrounding the site is as follows: West: North: East: South: Freeman Park ball fields; zoned R-IC Freeman Park: wetland; zoned R-l C Eureka Road, then vacant and one single-family dwelling; zoned R-IA State Highway 7, then Chanhassen Att.I A Residential Communiw on Lake Minneronka's South SlIor" , . . . , Memo Re: Shorewood St.1.1l0r Housing 30 July 1997 As shown on Exhibit B, the land slopes gently (slightly less than two percent) from south to north into a 2.77 acre wetland. Most of the existing trees on the site, besides the Lan- De-Con nursery stock, are concentrated around the existing wetland. The applicant proposes to construct 20, four-unit buildings as shown on Exhibit C. A public street would be extended westward from Eureka Road over to Freeman Park. The southerly 10 buildings will be accessed from the public street. The remaining 10 buildings will be served by an internal private roadway system. The applicant proposes to exchange approximately 1.2 acres of land in the northwest comer of his property for. 9 acres of City property located on the south side of the wetland area, adjacent t.o Eureka Road. the proposed buildings, shown on Exhibits D and E, are single-story, four-unit structures. Each unit has two bedrooms and a two-car garage. Although not mentioned in the applicant's narrative (Exhibit F), initial discussions with City staff indicated that the units would be .owner-occupied. The developer is aware that the City's senior housing goal includes home prices of$120,000 or less. A public hearing has been set for 5 August before the Shorewood Planning Commission. Per the direction of the Commission, staff has extended the required legal notices from 500 feet to 1000 feet. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Senior housing is allowed in all of Shorewood's residential districts by conditional use permit, and is regulated by Section 1201.03 SuM. 20 of the Zoning.Code. This section requires any such projects to be processed as planned unit developments. Shorewood's P. U.D. provisions (Section 1201.25) contain mechanisms for the creation of homeowners' associations, maintenanceOf' common open space and facilities, and the establishment of protective covenants,. which for senior housing is designed to ensure that the housing will be limited to seniors. A. Concept Plan Review. Shorewood~s P.U.D. process contains three stages of review: 1) Concept Plan; 2) Development Stage; and 3) FinalPlan. Section 1201.25 Subd.6.b.(l) of the Zoning Code sets forth the purpose and elements of the Concept Plan review: 1. Maximum density range 2. Location of streets .and pedestriancircu1ation 3. L.ocation of public and . . .;" MemeRe: Shereweed St.-iller Housing 30 July 1997 4. Locatien and extent .of residential and n.onresidentialland uses 5. Staging.of develepment 6. Special develepment criteria B. Density. Sh.oreweod's senier heusing regulati.ons prescribe different densities within the varieus zening districts. The R-IA pertien .of the subject preperty is allewed up te feur units per 40,000 square feet .of net land area. The R-IC portien .of the site is allewed up to eight units per 40,000 square feet. The applicant has tabulated the acreage and density .of the preject (see Exhibit G). . These tabulatiens are in need .of miner revisienbecause Shereweed's densities are based .on 40,000 square foot units of net land area (tetal area, minus, City-designated wetland, public open space and public street right-ef-way).The applicant's calculatiens de n.ot subtract the street right-ef-way, which accounts fer nearly one acre of the t.otal site. The net area .of the site after deducting wetland and right-of-way is 14.86 acres, .of which 4.79 acres is zened R-IA and 10.07 acres is zened R-IC. C.onverting acres te units .of 40,000 square feet (see Sectien 1201.25 Subd.4.g.) results in a maximum.of 20.86 units on the R-IA portien .of the preperty and 87.72 units .on the R-IC pertien;_ .of the site. The tetal allewable units for this property is 108.58. It sh.ould be neted . that the applicant shows 16 units entirely .on the R-IA portien .of the site. Appreximately .one-half .of six .other units extend inte the R -1 A perti.on .of the preperty. C. StreetslCirculatien. The preposed public street extends frem EurekaR.oad west to the beundary .of Freeman Park. This weuld allewthe existing seutherly Highway 7 . access te the park te be clesed and park traffic to be redirected t.o Eureka Road, the designated cellecter street for the area. The preposed street is c.onsistent with the Highway 7 (west) Cerrider Study in which the City participated in .1995.. Bath the Planning Cemmissien and Park Cenmiissien have previously endersed this idea. It is worth neting that this cencept has been presented at two recent neighborhe.od meetings and is currently under advisement by the City. Ceuncil. Since the. internal readway system is .only 20 feet in width, the Fire Marshall has recemmended that n.o parking be allewed along the private drive. His comments will be distributed under separate cever. Eureka Read is currently substandard in terms .of right- .of-way width. Whereas a collecter street sheuld be at least 60 feet wide, it is .only 33 feet adjeining the subject preperty. At the directien of City staff the applicant has provided an additi.onall3.5 .., .) . . ... Memc Re: Sh.orewood Sl.......ur H.ousing 30 July 1997 feet .of r.c. W., making up .one-half .of the needed width. Past pelicy has been tc acquire half .of the necessary r.c.w. frcm each side .of the street. AdditienaI r.c.w. can be acquired at such time as the vacant land .on the east side .of Eureka Rcad is develcped. Hcwever, it will be difficult tc acquire additicnal r.c.w. frcm the existing hcmestead prcperty l.ocated in the ncrtheast ccmer .of Eureka Rcad and Highway 7 in the future. It is suggested that this prcject prcvide the entire 27 feet .of necessary r.c.w. between the highway and the new street (apprcximately 270 feet). This wculd necessitate shifting the six buildings alcng the.highway tc the west. The prcximity .of the develcpment tc Freeman Park suggests an cppertunity tc prcvide senicr residents with pedestrian access tc the park. The City may wish tc require that the prcject pr.ovide a trail system which wculd tie intc a perimeter trail arcund the wetland. This matter will be c.onsidered by the Park Ccmmissicn at its 12 August meeting. D. Public and Ccmmcn Open Space. With the excepti.on .of the prcpcsed land trade and the area tc be dedicated tc the City as wetland, there is nc public .open space included within the applicant's plan. The applicant pr.oposes t.o trade appr.oximately .9 acre .of Freeman Park (scuth .of the wetland, near Eureka R.oad) fcr 1.2 acres .on the west side .of the wetland. While this is advantagecus tc the applicant in terms cfhis .overall design, the City also ends up with mcre usable land fcr park use. Whether it be used in the future fcr additicnal parking .or simply passive recreati.onal use, the parcel being .obtained by the City relates better tc the park than the piece ccnveyed tc the develcper. The applicant prcp.oses tc.use the .9 acre fcr his required pending area, since that is where the prcperty naturally. drains. .The requested land swap will alse be ccnsidered by the Park Commissicn. The City designated wetland is 2.77 acres in size. The applicant's narrative suggests that this will be given t.o the City fcr park dedicaticn, h.owever, the City's wetland .ordinance requires wetlands tc be dedicated fcr c.onservati.on purposes. Park dedicaticn is E. Locaticn .of Residential and Ncnresidential Uses. The prcpcsed pr.oject is entirely residential. Fcr the MCst part the buildings have been arranged t.o ccmply with the requirements far planned unit devel.opment, which prcvide that setbacks at the periphery .of the site be maintained. Building setbacks are shcwn as fcllcws: . From Highway 7: SO feet for the R-IA portico. 40 feet far the R -1 C porti.on . From the west property line: 40 feet . From Eureka Road:. 50 feet (due to R-IA zoning) 4 ... . . Memo Re: Shorewood ... ..,dor Housing 30 July 1997 It should be noted that the setback from Eureka Road has been measured from the existing r;o.w. instead of the new. Future plans should be modified to reflect the additional r.o.w. Although the proposed buildings observe the 50-foot setback from the wetland, the proposed internal roadway encroaches in two places (see Exhibit C). Development stage plans should include a wetland delineation and should attempt to avoid the wetland buffer to the extent possible. Extra measures should be taken to protect the wetland area where encroachment is necessary. The Zoning Code allows setbacks within the site to be 15 feet from the traveled surface of the roadway. In past projects the City has also required a minimum of20 feet in front of garages to allow parking. The shortest driveway shown on the Concept Plan is approximately 35 feet. F. Development Sta$ng. The applicant proposes to begin construction this year and suggests that the project would be completed in two construction seasons. Since development stage plans would not be reviewed until OctOber and final plans would likely not be reviewed until November, a 97' construction start appears unrealistic. G. Special Development Criteria. Section 1201.03 Subd. 20 contains the specific criteria for senior housing. Following are issues that need to be addressed: 1. Occupancy. Senior housing is limited to people 62 years of age or older,. unless special services exclusive to the age group are provided, in which case the age limit is reduced to 55. The developer has suggested that the project would be limited to the 62 year age group. Since this has proven to be a marketing problem for the developer of the Seasons senior housing project located on Highway 7 and Old Market Road, Eaglecrest should address this issue by sharing any market research they have done which supports the age restriction. Any approval of the project should include a strict understanding of the age restrictions. Protective covenants with the City as a signatory will be required to be recorded against the property to ensure that it remains limited to senior housing. 2. Parking. Shorewood's zoning regulations require a minimum of two parking spaces per unit, with at least one garage per unit .The applicant proposes. two-car garages, with four available parking spaces per unit (including the garage). 3. Builc1inQ; Height. Building height in the single..tami1y zoning districts is limited to one and a half stories. As can be seen on Exhibit D, the applicant proposes .one story buildings. .',," . . Memo Re: Shorewood ~"'lrior Housing 30 July 1997 4. Fee Reductions. As an incentive to create affordable senior housing the normal fees for sewer connection and park dedication are limited to the number of single- family units which could be achieved under the current R-IA and R-IC zoning. Based simply on acreage, the number of potential single-family units would likely be 22, four in the R-I A and 18 in the R-l C. This would result in required fees of $22,000 for local sanitary sewer access and $22,000 for park dedication.. Water fees under current policy would amount to $20,000 per building. Although there has been discussion about reducing this fee in order to encourage maximum sale prices of$120,000 per unit, no official action has been taken to date. Any reduction to this fee should be tied directly to the City's price limit goal. 5. C.U.P. Criteria. Four criteria are set forth in Section 1201.04 Subd. l.d.(I)ofthe Zoning Code. a. Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan establishes a goal of providing senior housing. This goal is reflected in the City's Livable Communities commitment with Met Council which states that Shorewood will try to achieve 60 senior housing units in 1997. The proposed site was the subject of a study by the City which identified it as one of the top three suitable locations remaining in the community. The study ex~ed approximately 35 sites of more than three acres each and took into consideration existing zoning and allowable density, traffic, land use compatibility and availability of utilities, particularly City water. (It should be noted that the site location study was done before City water was extended along Smithtown Road. This water extension may have increased the suitability of additional sites.) b. One of the reasons the subject site ranked high in the study was its separation from existing single-family development Bounded by Freeman Park on two sides. and Highway 7 on a third, the nearest residences are on the east side of Eureka Road. Proper design and landscaping can result in no more visual impact for existing residential properties than if four single-family homes were built along Eureka Road. c. Protection ofsun-oundingproperty values can be enhanced through design, particularly landscaping. Development stage plans should include significant landscaping in the SO-foot setback area along Eureka Road. For the benefit of the seniors who will.live there, additional landscaping and screening should be required along Highway 7 and adjacent to the east boundary of the park. Adequate t;lrea exists within the required setbacks to build berms in those locations. 6 . . ,.... Memo Re: Shorewood St:......or Housing 30 July 1997 It should be noted that most of the existing trees on the site are nursery stock. Although the applicant suggests that trees adjacent to the wetland can be preserved, his plans suggest removal of most of the trees on the south side of the wetland. Iffound to qualify as significant trees under Shorewood's Tree Preservation and Reforestation Policy, the site design should be modified to protect the existing tree line. d. Sewer and water are available to the site, although existing water main sizes are incapable of providing adequate fire flow (see Engineer's report under separate cover). The Fire Marshal has recommended that in the absence offIre flow, the buildings should be provided with sprinkler systems. If the new road is to serve as the southerly access to Freeman Park, it has been suggested that at least the portion of Eureka Road south of the new road will have to be upgraded. This could be coordinated with future improvements to Highway 7 which are currently being studied by the City and the Department of Transportation. RECOM:MENDATION Although the applicant's plans are generally consistent with Shorewood's development regulations, a number of issues mUst be resolved in any future site planning. If the Concept Plan is to be approved it should be conditioned upon the following items being addressed in the Development Stage Plan: No on-street parking should be allowed within the project - on the public street or the internal roadway system. Provide additional r.o.w. for Eureka Road between the new road and Highway 7. Coordinate upgrade of Eureka Road with MNDOT improvements. Incorporate pedestrian facilities into plans and tie into Freeman Park trail system. Park Comt)1i~on should .comment on trail recommendation in 4. above and proposed land swap. 6. Provide SO-foot setback from new Eureka Road r.o.w. Shift buildings if necessary . 7. Avoid wetland buffer where feasibly, enhance protection measures where encroachment is necessary. 7 . . . '''' Memo Re: Shorewood SelJ..lor Housing 30 July 1997 8. Draft strict, clear protective covenants (with City as signatory) regarding occupancy requirements and future maintenance of private roadway system. 9. Relate present and future fee reductions to maximum sale price of$120,OOO. 10. Require significant (size and quantity) landscaping to provide buffers along park boundary, Highway 7 and Eureka Road. Design should include evergreen trees and shrubs for year-round effectiveness. 11. Tree preservation plan should identify existing site vegetation. Plans may need to be modified to preserve significant trees on south side of wetland. 12. Sprinkle buildings for fire protection. cc: Jim Hurm Larry Brown John Dean Kevin Von Riedel Bill Gleason 8 ~ C\\~lli' ,- ON I JUVlI- ~ t-~~ ~ J/ .....- '1,- .-0:( .<( I / It, /(y :r. Ji.<-' 1</ ~ ~~~ 10 ( O( M3~(]3M '/'1 ',,"-1. _\ '(1-\. " r "" - /'\. ~--I~ - I .~~ ~LOH <( -' J: -liJ" -liT -- _.J ..J Vl [1 ;. - -@ _ 1~' &(?tMO\H11I $ ~ 1- i~ ~ I i\ '\?,<." Vl ~ --'-11 _,",0'0; I OJ J fl ) I -- _4~_~ \ '(" I "f1) '-- ~\')~\ ~ ~1/ - 0_ - -=0"""4 / -:1 ,0 \~ ,\~~;1 \, ~ /_L .( -~ J ) ~. )- III __I ..S.----- ;t > \) ., P (I ) C';<~~ '> ....... '. ) (..-] J~ fT ------ - r '!- ~ +-~ z .. [ .,- .~~] /1 c- t._ - \~'QH ZN3fOl >1-:- \~ I ""-- - l.( '__. l---'--l I JEf o 0:: -- \ , V)I:Hn3 HO z :z J~ I <( -' / I ST~AVBEHR) LA . n~~ n==r ! ~ ~ ~ ! u: 1<"1>- Im\ L r--' L- [ .~ -.r. ~) L ~.1 V bll :-1 UJ SN\ ViV 3S \ I I OH oil \ c 1 t J ~\ ~~ >- <~ ~ ~~U \. v. (~ ~ \J) 1 $) _1 r 1 t)J ,f y ( I~ \\ r-- l~ 1 ~ --~, Q 0- ~ u \{r-' g- _ '.:i .e- m 31: -J .~......--. " ~. ~ "-') JV 31 - .____ ...( t5~ ..,.-& -" - rrd"I'l). '\ ~ :i;' ~< 9- ~) 0'0 ~ t';:o O<\Y c(,> [I~I e--JI .~-r.. .&O~,<.......vl.I~~~1 I ~r I 1,..-, ~ I~ .- .-----1. ~' 1 ~r . . f ' . I "":z:.~ _..~~ ~:.. . '. :. ~~\:"'I 'j.-\. " : -':;', ' ""/ - . --" ~': "'\~" \" ..-..\ ..J . .,~.......... , , ~ ">.,. "-.... . L---------uJ\., ' , """':'... -..:- ~\ ~,J ~~ ~ t I ' ~., / ,. ..... ~. ~ , ~ ......~"'_ ""'-,..,.,.........'~/ ... \. "r F' ('""-~' ..t: . . .t""":~, f"-r" ,,' ....:' ....j.. .:: 4 . . ?,J.... .....""..~~.... ~\ II "'" . ,. -/.!' I~; 'I I ~-- .J ~..} . \.. 1'" ......... " ':,1 i ...., r - .1; ..LA : '~^~.::p..~~~--""',-... ::"-...n "'._..-.~ ... ~ 'i ',-, (,,;._ v~ 'J, . -~....- ~ ~- ., 't'ot; "... .~~. .., ,\... .......: "",",'~ ,<. . -~~~v~.... ....--., "';..) --.:::---....,....----... .---.., ~$ '-'-'> ,t I ~ ......... ...... .~~ .....- -s. - ;. to'i r..-------.......... ~ ........"". -.........- -"--- .... . I~: . ~ ,/~ \ "'--. -" ';, J ..' f' . I L.ri[ /'/__-<"';:~rv:::~:~::;;~~~~. :::-:~._.. ...-..-.-....h~:>.~/~___:':~~~l[> ---------------1 ',' .t';" ~~ "'. ~ ~'-":'"Y'~'~.;;.:;.:..:.:.;::..~.;;::.:..__~.-..: . J.,;.d ~.}, F;:tE2M~M ~AR~ ---..... ....:. . 1-___________...... /0;;: \ ....... _ .......... ________ "'-.J: ::-:';:3.:R~ E:(V.. ' . : .i ,. 1. --..... ...=-:.__________--.____:-...:- ..., " , / -------- -----~--~--- ----:--- ~~""""""_J-.~~ :; I , ...~ : ~'Sr~!!$' r---.--..---' T ,......--..-.. >, ' (I ~<.. J' " J' 0:'- ,.~ ---- I ' . -~ :~....:. .....::.:...~ . ~., ," 15- -... ':~":"i'Jo .".:.:..:: . --3: i :;,,~~;\';;;;:; J~ ~ ---tli\ f i \-..:f c]\ ~:~~JI: I ~ --------------1 ___" ~ ..~. .... \. I ~ ......, :J . I --- I. -"" ~~-. . ~ '; \,' I, I ,\.), : ' I l' ~.. : -~.. -L5,.~~~~~ h__'" ..._..__._~~\ \~ \ { :1 wr.:!.~>::; i \.i" <;~.:..~..::]ii. 1 /r~~~:EfftH ...,...-'! ! t ~ .;- '~_=.Y -"- " \,1\\ ~I \; ;75e: '5i."iK-- , /""",' -1' ~ JV .,;::::;..- ;: ; \ J;,,: I ~,' .... ,~' / "'~. r---,-..., ~ '3: 'v. k ~ \ ./ --.------.;e , ~.. "-..' :""1 y-. I"' . ~ \ /' . :' .( ~,I d, . orf ~\.- , ',' "'\ ; .' I : ~,' -"" ... -....;. ~ ,:) .. ~ '-.......::t: ........... ;:X~ST;!.iu 1 I :-f::.r..::;x:O~'5;~:'i . I Z .... \:r. P.......i', ....- . . I . .....:;,. ..........--\ '- I \...t::, '.-../ '--'-....... .... '\ . '; ~~'Es., :; . \ \ r '--, , !~. --.........~~ ..... ...... '\ / ,*, ~ I . : i;; I '. .-..... '--~ i ::.tJ ! '",,-~""'~' \. ',' /../ ~j! I r- ',' ~---------"1 )-------7- .._~ I' ..~~ "', -" ~ ~r ~:. .....&-" . . . .,"- '1 '---<:'., ,.-. .l--._ '" '>-..-;JiP' ...."'r::..).g~:/..~I;<.iaZ..;5 "', ~'!t-""" #" r:;;;:::::,~A:."": :;.......::;<' .~~ '0\0.; '.. '-J;"" ;.?:;,:---, " :'"': J ::-''':I.'A$'2.2= S.o~~ / : M ',\ 1 ,,,~. /.. '! : . ...t.., I ......,.:,'."., '. 1 . .,,~< I' ", ,;---- < ~./ ' I I -:...' : "'. ~,~;,....;--:.;.., ~.. -:) 1 ~ __...-u___...-._____ ------...----00""1 . / I :.. . ""..'! "C. /' .~.~ . . '/ v^ ~\ .,/: \"'r~' \ / ~~. ! ! '^~ / ./ I j.., . '" ./. : r, I . PO, I ' '. '~'''''-'O',.. ~J:'-- ~-_"::Kt;.;:S t . . ~ "';'::':::ie. :,....:..:0 . ~: !in." F;~J:~Lr ! \ ,..-"....., ~ 'J "w_....~.. " I .;...v.,..... .~. ~ '" , ! :-...-.-...r......... (~': : :~. .~c;;~s i :!4 , I ~. ~ ~ ~ '000 __ ""'" .. -------- i ~\~~~~~~.J ! ,---- "l / --'~:;~'-:;-~:::=- I, - - - ~ - - - _ \ \ ---------4 '"r- I - _ ~ .,,' _ " . , ' . " ..... ......_ " /~ i(C _~r: 34C.-~ ........ " ,- -, -- _---.:;;r-----,_ / l' Ii?' .;..: ,,<>..;> "'. , ....... ~ ~ ,-:... .."j'/ I ....----, "'" ':t:.:';:~~""g73i;' ~ . t,.; "J i ' '.i,' /f ,.--T. -,',- /' -.. I > 0; I _-------- , -, / ,.!! -J.-....--- ____ v .,.... ./ .ct-..... ;. : ,: : 1,.l..!,/' . .....::,;.:"~...-..<~ L..-------..- "" - . ".? .--... -~I "')' ;/' . l""; ..... ./ -- """,,".,,~- "- .,.., (?'..J '".:', ' " >') L,: ; ~ i: V _""--- ._"............. __ "- ../"""". :(~ - .: /)...i t,';: . t ~ 1..~~ ~..~~.-.f~\i. ___....---- . 1:- ""h-.' l~~'- :' ; (. 1 ..bU.~~.~--" V^~- l-',,;....:..,. "';;. " ___- '\. : :_..l:"";: ./ / ~.~~ ..:.:~--' ., / -_..:~_:.~.:.'"-.:...----'- -..----.---'l r -.----..~'\ I L-:..;;.-- 'V -.; ,: / --- _" '\ . - J....., __/-..--..-..-.. __-.---- -- .-.._~ ----- .....----_... '\ .. ~.:...----- / / ----.---.--- '\ '\ / / I I I '. ~. ...............-. DRAWING F'lLE; C,\DWG\97050\B3-970SO.DWG [ REVISIONS ] [ l "'..... ~ 6110 81ue Circle Dr, SWt.e '100 ""'" EAGLECREST NORTHWEST ,~ MinneLonk... Mil. 55343 \:~O<W OC ;:.-~O( 3030 HARBOR LANE '-../ fax: f::~~ ~:?~~~ ~Q.j~' >c. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 117050 LEGAl. DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: The West 10 rods of the Easterly 20 rods of Lot 9B. Auditor's Subdivis;on Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (133). Hennepin County. Minnesota. The Easterly 10 rods. front end reor. of Lot 98. Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (1 33~. Hennepin County. Minnesota. lot 23. Meeker's Outlots of Excelsior. Parcel 2: Thot parcel of land located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described os fOllOws: Lot 74. Auditor's Subdivision No. 133. according to the plot thereof on record at the office of the Registrar af TItles. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Containing 136.343 square feet more or less. POreel 3: lhot parcel of land is located as port of the southeast quarter of the !outheast quarter of section 32. Township 117, Range 23 in Hennepin County. Minnesota. \ \ \ \ \ \ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1" : 100' I~ 300' \!1J 0' 100' 200' SHOREWOOD SENIOR HOUSING r EXISTING l~ MN HWY. 7 & EUR Exhibit B EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS . . , . . - ....:=- .. / '". ". ':'",:~_. ". - ';,~ . -:;'::. , .... .... ~. ;.......~.,......--------. ~. .~ : . 4 -~~'" -.- ......-....-.. ;~ L.-....._......_...._....~\ . -... ................. . .. ~.: ~~. ' - --....,_..,....,..., ,........,. ,--<i" ,'. ..... ........--;::;--:_~ " _.~"--.-----'\ \'" (tV /?': ,1 J -......,^__~"<O--.~~~-~~__ ','\ "', " '..<~_J " ~'. \. \ ~:: \ (j <.........~. it "'==^::v~.- t:"",.._;;~dit~f::~:So~~~...:\,,>/ ! < }'i :----.----..- rr~,..." ",' -......- -.......;.;.;:;:;... ',_. " _",,_' .l:;......._.._.._..___-... //1'"1 f l ( .--::,,;~:;;;,:;:.:::::.:.:.:.:::: "~::.:'~__! ! ~ ; .It q .:.. ~ ;::tEiEM~N f;ARK ~"""___~"=."'!.:. ~_________....._ _.._.._.._.._--------,-~Ut'___~-:::-'-~j-~"-'~~""'= '.~:,.,"': . : ! r "1 ~ If,~ '-i-o\ ~ / :: ------"-"-"1 ..__---1 ... ---' j --><":. '. '. .:~::~:::~~~~t:r-- i ,~~ I '" ' ~ ! --r-- ("'\ .f~~~~--"'~\" \ ~ i OUMT' ~';';"' I :", :t~j~ / /" i . ;: \...-...... ~--.-... :L:':.,,!;,;;; ':f ':::::::::::::;;;.::::;~:~ &IV~~~:\ i!!: ;":1 /' ;--___.._..--, ,<~:......-~. -.1 ..::;~;:~.:-~ \,\,t" ..;....,~~~=;;. ............ ; ", _. /M(:. ~t., J . i "'0 _ '4 : '~ -'.;:;:(:C;C':.":', -.. .... ~ ;:~.. L....:.~: " ............... ------'.." ':...;. : :r-J.-J. 9 '4,., <L'..,,'; ~ '.._ :: ' .'....... 1 1......~..~ ',- \........~r . ~ .-' ~::': ". ~'...- ...:::..~~ ',- '-." .LtJ =:')'(~"; :'11 17 .::} ~ ~I: .' /)...------:T~---: (';., T140, ."1.1 : a I. I ~._ ..,~,:o:~" "~R~ -4. ::,-i ; 13 :. $~' . .." ". . 'I' ~ . :;, ' 12 ' ~ ;:~ : 9 10 E . '00 42: .J ,,-<, m"" - -~ : :F'm':~'''''' 7-~J.i - ........ .:' I: :If ........-F.II ,5 ~l. ......'::~ :'. 1-1:: }~~,.....,.:_~:~,~ ; '11 ""f' =::.;' 40 , ~ :::~.,' 4 3~ ; . : 'I : ~ I ~).:, "1 ' 1 2 ~. i,:" r--t -~. ...0<01- / ! j--..-.....-.....-....1 :.;~;.:::. /' ....t'J~.:~5";... .I" .:;-.... / ~)'".../.-. /'. :. /' i/::=::~ .~.:~ la L~\.. j I ; .-------~.-"':;::---~ \,;, i t ~~{ ......, . .\ ___ . .. _ .. - -i ~~:}~~....;-~:. / \ \ \ ~ \. \ . ;' . . . \'f\V' l \ ~\ /~ ,,~ ~=.=:-~ ;..:~:;:;<;:~.; ~ ~ ~.--_. --...."1 , ' ....... : .:..l: . S.f.. , \ b ':"'~' , ..-L.--_. ..----..---- .;r:> . f~> ; - '~.? .::-', C;i .-..... , .jr-: f :,.....--: ....... ./ ' -.....--....-....-. ~_..-_..._.... _..-~ -'- , - . ~.r--...__....____ DRAWING F"I~E: C:\OWC\970SO\B3-97050.DWC [ ,~.," J :lfSQ!.J ~ ~ \......./ SliD Blue Circle Dr. Suit.e 1100 Minnet.onka.Mn.. 55343 (612) D33-0A72 F'az: (812) 933-1153 KVR MKW IlIerCtcertily!tlllIIlis_IJOS.~'DJ'_ItIltlde!'!llfci=: suoenitionencitlictIOll'lcOU1J~'~~ :.II'IQel' lilt ICm oi tl'le Stole clliliMescl:. EAGLECREST NORTH~ST 3030 HARBOR LANE PL mOUTH, MN 55447 - C~ .x:"E~ 1J!C"C, ~~:7~ 97050 jA~ ~1 ~.: : ~L ~ ~~ :1'. . . \~ ~ I '---- =--"'- REOUEST . Approvel of Conditional Use Pennit lor 0 Planned Unit Development Concept Pion for Senior Housing DEVELOPMENT OATA Comprehensive Lend Use Guide Plan Existing North East West South Zoning Existing Proposed North East Worst South Site Area Wetlond Area Nel Area R-1A Area R-1C Arlta Outlot A Are uti 1 Arlta Pondin a USable pen poce Minimum Proposed ~and Swap with City (Highland Ground) ~ow Density '" Semi Rural Rnioorntial Public Portcs Sorrni-RutOl Residential Public Parks City of Chanhossorn R-l A. Single F" omily Residential R-1C. Single Family Rnidential R-1A. Single F"amily Residential R-1C, S"lfl9le Family Residential R-1C. Single Family Residential R-l A. S"'"'}1e Family Residential R-1C, Single Family Rnidorntial Iotinnesoto State Highway 7 Pre-d_enl 19,O~ Acres 2. 7 Acres 16.31 Acres 4.45 Acres 14.63 Acres N A N A N A Post -deYltlooment 15.83 Acres o Acres 15.83 Acres 5. 13 Acres 10.70 res . res . 2 Acr 0.86 Acres N/A N/A R-tA 1.03 Ac. (20%) 1.48 Ac. (28.B%) ..!!::.K.. 2.14 Ac. (20%) 3.11 Ac. (29.1~) Maximum number of residentioJ units based on current loni~9 From City: 0.90 Ac. To City: 1.21 Ac. R-1A 223.672 s.l I 40.000 - 5.592 x 4 - 22,37 R-1C 465.871 s.l. I 40.000 11.647 x 8 ~ Total - 115.54 Units Proposed Dwelling Units 80 units Density 80 units/15.8.3 ac.- 5.05 Dwelling UnitslAcre Building Setbacks Public R.O.W Setback Pork Setback Eureka Rd. Setback Hwy. 7 Selback Building Height Moximum Proposord Porking Required Proposed Sortbacks Privete Rood Sidor Yard Rear Yard SHOREWOOD SENIOR HOI' ~ R-1C 35' 35' N/A 40' SO' N/A SO' 40' 1 112 Stories 1 Story 2/Owelling Unit 4/Dwelling Unit 15 11. 5 ft. 5 It NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1" : 100' O' ~ 100' ZOO' 300' ( 1 (~~107 ) MN HWY. 7 & EU Exhibit C CONCEPT PLAN Shorewood Senior Housing EagJecrest If ~ /' C l-...,~ F..' d "b t,..."~1 :2J..vd ""0'11. '0" '..."".f --.., .. - -.~~:.-~ '~~ .......I..~"..... _.:.:~ ...;~:t.~~-:-..;::.. ~~ ,-"-- ",', ,'~~ .~"' ""I.'nIUWJ\.,."" ""ND4JOl"~ ",' ~"'."'.''''Itt$hN'''''~ O"N ... .at I..",U ... IU .,... _IfUOMn...... , '...'.11..... .......11. '" it....,. 19"'.~1 ....... .........., ., \>....., .., Wltf, ..."""" .... ';k1llNlr 'WI ,"IOC" t.or.....'" .... lJJ ,'OJ \.L o 7-. ..... Cl ."" N ..Jh.3r.It? ,....,.".".= h"il.....-.:>tf .....N ,............ ,....",...... tt?ttt .f, -..... ~ ',..,., ~~,.,.....,..." '~,-"":>I,.,,'~ .."'::..~...,,,~_~ Cl .~.l~~~ ~_ _ _ t"":;.~~ "'!..-1'!lr.....J,..ut '- -...... .. 7 .. . - . . t' --~ ., ;1 , ,i- t ~ I I 1.1' /. --1: .._I 0., cY C C ._J U. Cl U-l J.Lltll i!i' - M .~ . , ,,' I -.:1~ ....... """'< !. r - 'I i~ J ;, i.., 'jC' .0-,1," ---i--";~",-_,,;,,___,,;,.____ -..-- ----.--:,=,.;; "-'" . ... t ! _0-." .0'::1. .1',"' .f1J l.---.., . : ";~ 1....-.~ ..........d.. .. f~'iJ - Q..,jI -~~.H . 9"'t't....~UT r ~ 1.t' i I ~ .7.'- l'..r" .-.....1 . ~ t~,.v\-l :t:1,.,~. 3'u '!lP..'>1.'_ _:~I_ ..--.-.... .?'".' .,...." ..'~e ,.....? .7 " '.._, i1'_ .r..., I """ .~- ..... . . . . .,i . " June 6, 1997 Shorewood Senior Housing Minnesota State Highway 7 and Eureka Road Shorewood, Minnesota By: Developerl Applicant Eaglecrest Northwest 3030 Harbor Lane Plymouth, MN Professional Consultant RLK-Kuusisto Inc. 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 REQUESTS The applicant requests city approval of a conditional use pem1it for a concept Planned Unit Development ofapproximatelyI5.83acres, consisting of 80 senior housing units. This Planned Unit Development proposal includes the preservation of existing wetlands and a number of the scattered trees which cover a portion of this site. Parcell The west 10 rods of the easterly 20 rods oflot 98, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Easterly 10 rods, fi'oot and rear, of Lot 98, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 23, Meeker's Outlets of Excelsior. Parcel 2 That parcel ofland loeated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Lot 74, Auditor's Subdivision No. 133, according to the plat thereof on record at the office of the Register ofiltles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Containing 136,343 square feet more or less. Exhibit F APPLICANt'S !\A R R_j,.Tn.J:= Dated 6 June t GC1- M ~ ~ .r ~~ a .~ '0 :a t--enZ ~1'~ .. p,. \0 '5 ~.8rJ .....enQ g ~ I CI2 -a ~ ~ Fj -< .J 8i' ..:B -I 1Il~:ll [~.~ ~~~J1 ~!l tl!l.: l'~..:' 'll 1'" :ll P Ii " ...'" .til '" ~ fl U ~ t II p 1l:8lf!11 .rtl~ j ii111:J.~i "S.JI.~.o ! .fj Fj fj li .;; ~ .s .8 g ~ -B ] ~.- .fj e -I ,. 1.1 ]JIJe~~ B 'hi~ i .~~~ i:P~ll Fj 8 0 ~ ~ ~ 8 .~. t-- .~ 1>>. -I s .a fa II- iilltl~f! i j~Jl~ i.illl) . ~ I'~<)J ~ l 'i 'll .... ..JI. .. ~:H ill! ] ~" t IJ 1il ti f :t:.1l i R I .. 8.ll. .JI .llll I~ l!'.1I .fj . 9 ~ ca e & (1" .all 5 "@-B (1,1 0' i 1:1 Ji JI & I l 1.8 ~ l~ .. · Jl ~ ] l::.1l t .. f~ ~ Jl . i I r 1 ~ ,9 8 1 .fj -a ~ "I ~ :z fn ~ :~ .~ ~ ~ 1 -fJ II ~ ~ 1 '!y .1 !j .8, ~ 111 'il -ll '1'10 -a.f!';; . 'll' .fs.e ~ .B .8 ll.l. It ~ .JI'" "'I iJ. : &.. t ] B ~ ~ i 8. s ~ . ~ en . ~ .~ ~ .~ [ go..,.. '2 Hi I if ! ~ .f ~ u h l( ~ .! ~ .ill sit I h 1.j~ .'1 (9 cIS ~ ~ 8 ~ g .8 {}3 ~ ~ i ~ =t: F;1 F=l i 0 ~ -I -I -I u 8 ~ ~ .ti .I's .. . . . . . . . . . ..-,. June 6, 1997 Shorewood Senior Housing Descriptive Narrative Page 4 The proposed development may be constructed during two coostrw::tion seasons if time does not pennit the entire development to be constructed in one season. If that should occur, the development will be CODStIUcted in two phases. The southern 10 structures that abut the public .street will be constructed during the first phase. The remaining ten structures will be constructed along with the private driveways during the second phase. , , I," stll~ .,f l. . ! i.\1 , lI'~ . B i .'. "' . '] - ]~~ 1! i' !lJl '.1 :'- 'os f ~ $' il i : - - oJ sl ~. ,..: 1 . / ~L I i Ie ~ -~. ! Ii" Il~ . &! I Ja IJ~ .-i~ . ;.t::l Ii' ,~'fll ) , ~ 1 ~ .1. 1 .I '9 ',E' 'f i ,. ~ il:ft . .81 :J a, 1 l;..a ' ~ -g :I.~ g: 8 t ,,!l 'Ii . ! oJ $',!!:B s J . ~ .~ f'f -g l~l" :..g ~ :; J.s'i!i6' bO e ..<< ,8 ~ "A" 11 e . I:l ' Ji ~.....\' '1'1 J ,a. " ~' 'J" l!l 'ii ~ .!'l j t" fiIo,S,g ,0-3;2. I!il. ' -. It. 0 . P 6L ,t' '" a. . iii i: "'. ... S i5. .1' , f.~ '" f-4 . { . I 'I'" , ' .!Q .u _ ~ S u.., iI .... ol:l .. ~...... ~ '~. \ ,'_ ~ ~ lj :H~~!' :,S U .\t~,';: i,lll ~f~ . .~/ g ~.. ~ f..~..tl,~ll..~"ljfla:I"'l !:: . tl~~' ..' ._ ~ '"I Flol" .dl!l ",...It .' It ' IS , -s g ~ tt-lo 0 e" ~Q "9 ,,' ~ .. 1:1. , .s::' f-4' 0 \. M 'tI , ,','- ~ J:Lt. ~ ' .;;;! Si! 'ij ',', ,.'t1 ~tIi :~'f!' ..J ~ - r~~ (3 ~ ~'ij "'~g z ....~z c c:1i - ;;) (IJ b -~.' 811 ~~ CM"~, ,?ZI31 ~ U...,.I ,.-."J p....,.~ 5.r_~,;s~"..~", (0 (") C\I ~, t;;: , ! @"! ,... . (0- -;,1 '!I' ~B 130 i'!'iJ wi z. ~. ~'8 ~ :!~ 081 0::. O rn~ ' ~~~.- o ~I ~ c. <CD , '~~~'~ I,U 3~ , 0..... >-~ O~~ ~ SU- . lQ , r 1"'\ lQ , '1..1 II; , ! ....... . '. ,".. - - , ' ~ ~ . ~ r! a J .'" i i ,I:: ~ .., \~ a ,~ :c: ~ 'e (l I t c-: ~ . " .- . "" Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council Eaglecrest . Concept Review August 1, 1997 --Page 2 of3 The remaining roadways for the development are proposed as private roadways. Plans indicate that a 20.0 foot width would be utilized for these roads.; It is recommended that the applicant revise the plans to incoqro~e a 22.0 foot wide road for the internal roadways. This would provide easier , access for em~ vehicles during winter months an4' periods inclement w.~ther. . It is also recommended that the private roadways' be constructed to the City's typical pavement design. ThiS is suggested due to the possibility of'a senior housing association not being able to bear - ' assessment costs of reconstruction. Often times the City would be petitioned to reconstruct ~ roadway to avoid taxing the seniors out of their homes. Right of Way ......_# The applicant has proposed the dedication of a roa.ckyay right of way of SO feet along the collector road.. This would be the only public road for. this profect.. This appears appropriate for this type of _padway. . .--- " Parking: The plan provides-for a dual purpose area at the end oCtbe common driveways to each unit. Often times these areas serve as a turn around or auxiliary parking. This type of parking is common for these types ofunits and appears adequate for the jntended use. , - , '-,., \ ---', _ . Sanitary S~ sanitary sewer. is available to the sit~ from an existing 9 inch PVC sewer main within Eureka.!toad. Elevations of the existing topography appear to be sufficient to be serviced by the sanitary seyler main in Eureka R.oad. . /-:..... '" ....., '. .'.~ "" " . waiermQin: . .~' .": : .. ..: 1 .. _ ~ . .....t..-.... .. . . . . .... I.. ~\'.,'" ';" Concerns were mised with regard to the extension of the watennnain to service this ~. since this sectioo:Qftbe'sYstem is a dea4'end system. from. the intmection Of Smithtown B.oad ind Cajed,Lane. This'exteDSion'W&S anal~ Bn.' adequate ~fIoW""ptotection.: -,' Adequate;re ~ ~on is ~'fOt.this case as being capable of ~;isoO gaJIons per minute un.aI;form. twO me hydrants occurring ~ with the maximUm'~y useJ Us!nl'. :. ,-:these ~ '_/ ., . "' , ,. . ,', ....._~. ,....." " . ......... ,.'r. The cloiest ~ mUnicipal water service to'the meta an existing 6 inch ~wat~ located between softball fields 1. and.2 of heman park. This watermain is a 6 inch ~er main which is serviced by the -ShoreWood Oaks Development. ': I ~. _ _~;-o ~ . - -', - ,,", - ',-'"," - - , " - - ',' - - ',','--.,' ,', - ",.. ~-- ,"',' " - ,'- - .~- - - - ,;,' -",- ,,;'- - " ,'" <' The results of the analysis for the extension ofWatermain from this point ~tsin.'~ ~flQW equa1 '" . . Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council Eaglecrest - Concept Review .- August 1, 1997 .. Page 3 of3 . .. to 450. gallons per mimite. TIusis considerably less than the I?OO gallons per minute required The Flre .Marshall has stated that if the :fire flow demands can not be met, each unit will be required to have a fire sprinld~ system. . . /" I __ ~A I I _, . Other alternatives considered included the extension of a 12 inch diameter tnmk waterniain froni-the Shorewood Oaks intersection near TH 7 to the site. This would provide would provide 530 gallons per minute which is deficient for fire flow demands. The last alternative is the construction ofa 12 inCh diaMeter watennain from the interseCtion of- Shorewood Oaks Drive to Eureka Road, and looping this system with an 8 inch diameter watermain to the intersection of Smithtown Road and'Eureka Road.' Under this scenario, a nreJlow' of 1500--- gallons per minute is aChieved. - --. Of the alternativescotiSidered, the constxuction ofintema1sprinlding systems is likely the most cost effiectrV""' . .', ',,, e .. \ . . ! i , Drainage.,,: -. -. . ",-. . , . Proposed contours were not submitted wit:q the site plan. ,HOlveVer, from the naIrative provided by . the applicant it is proposed that the site would drain to a. basU110cated in.thenortheast quadrant of the site. A nuIP pond will be constructed to treat the water prior to the release of stormwater into the wetland.. . -.'. . . '. j \ i. ,.. - . .":-~.\"l .Ii \ .... ..: . This wetlind drains through ~reeman Park to an outlet structUre immediately southeast of th~ LRT ;Ttail. From there. the floW-continues Under the trail, under sniithtown Road and ultimately to. the '. wetland west of Grant Lorenz Road (I-erer to ~ 2).' . -,i ~ . ~ ;.. ..... ," .--. ': The pond wili bve to' ~~ tlie pre-d~ped nmottrate' and tftAintain adequate ~ty fur the i 100 year ev,ent :~ Would be required in fi.vor of the City over the ponding site-for~. '~mai1UeDanee opelations. ~ \ .-.:..-, --.... ! ': r J~ . . ". ' . . 'I - . .... If approved, it is reco"hu~e(hhat the ron~g conditions apply: ; -' '.. i .:..... . I ~i... "':... i.".-"/ . . .... . .. ,,;' 1.' The prlvate:roadwi.ys ~ ~ to a miPiInum width of22.0 feet and in accordance to the ,: . CttY's standar<fs for PaVement desip.._ -;... " ..- " :/\. '. ,':.' '- /.. . -..~.-. .... -x:\- 2. The desip must indudei~~ to provide ad~ me suppression acceptable I'. to the City ~~ ancfF'n MmbaJ1.' . ... :' ,- -. .' ....."". ...:..: .... \ . ......... .. -'''. ',: . . .. ..........' . ". . . ~~.. 3. /T.!e applicint' ~.~ will provide'storm sewer calcuf.ations as. part of.the prelbninaty Cie$ign - showing adequate capacity fOr. aNW pond.. ......... . .' .I .i' . .--, . '. j .' ", ::,', .....,. c" 4. The;Main access'rOadway sbaJl ~ extenciedto intersect the Freem8n'Parlc~ road.- .' . \...... ... " : '. -'" " / -....- -- .. --'" /'- ,', ! '\ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99- 008 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR SHOREWOOD SENIOR HOUSING (EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST, INC.) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. (the "Applicant") has an interest in real property located in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for approval of a Concept Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, for the construction of a residential planned unit development known as Shorewood Senior Housing containing 62 dwelling units on approximately 19 acres of land; and . WHEREAS, the project is proposed as senior housing, pursuant to the requirements of 1201.03 Subd. 20 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request has been considered by the City Planner, and WHEREAS, Applicant brought a lawsuit against the City seeking approval of an 80 unit senior housing development; and WHEREAS, resolution of the lawsuit is possible by allowance of the senior housing Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood .as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT . The Property is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Eureka Road and State Highway 7. 2. The property consists of three parcels containing a total land area of approximately 19.08 acres, of which 2.77 acres exists as City-designated wetland. 1. 3. The net area of the property, after subtracting City-designated wetland and public street right-of-way, is 14.86 acres, of which 4.79 acres is located in the R- IA, Single Family Residential District, and 10.07 acres is located in the R-IC, Single-Family Residential District. 4. Land use and zoning surrounding the property is as follows: West: North: East: Freeman Park ball fields; zoned R-IC Freeman Park wetland; zoned R-l C Eureka Road, then vacant and one single-family dwelling; zoned R-IA State Highway 7, then Chanhassen; zoned residential South: Att. III . . . . .. Resolution No. 99- 008 Page 2 of 4 5. The Applicant proposes to construct 62 dwelling units as shown on Exhibit B, the occupancy of which will be limited to persons 62 years of age and older. 6. The proposed dwelling units will each have two bedrooms and a two-car garage. 7. The Shorewood Zoning Code, by conditional use permit, allows elderly housing to have as many as four units per 40,000 square feet of land area in the R-IA district and up to eight units per 40,000 square feet in the R-IC district. 8. Based upon the not area and zoning of the subject property, the Zoning Code would allow as many as 108.58 units of elderly housing. 9. Eureka Road, a designated collector street abutting the east side of the property, is substandard in terms of right-of-way width. The Applicant proposes to dedicate an additional 13.5 feet of r.o.w. for Eureka Road. 10. Required building setbacks at the periphery of the property are as follows: From State Highway 7: 50 feet for the R-l A portion of the site, 40 feet for the R -1 C portion From the west property line: 40 feet From Eureka Road: 50 feet From the City-designated wetland: 5Q feet 11. The Applicant proposes to develop the property over two construction seasons. 12. The Shorewood Zoning Code limits elderly housing units in single-family zoning districts to one and one half stories. The Applicant proposes single-story structures. The Shorewood Zoning Code requires at least two parking spaces per dwelling, of which one must be an enclosed garage. The Applicant proposes two garage spaces for each dwelling unit, plus additional parking in front of each garage. 14. City sewer is available to the property from Eureka Road. City water is available to the property from Freeman Park. Although preliminary tests indicate that fire flow may not be adequate to serve the project, the Fire Marshal has stated that sprinkling the residential units may be acceptable. 13. CONCLUSIONS A. The Applicant's request for approval of a Concept Plan for the Shorewood Senior Housing P.D.D. is subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below: 1 . Provide a plan for parking on the public street and the internal roadway system. " . ... Resolution No. 99- 008 Page 3 of 4 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. . 7. 8. Provide additional r.o.w. for Eureka Road between the new road and Highway 7. Coordinate upgrade of Eureka Road with MNDOT improvements. Incorporate pedestrian facilities into plans and tie into Freeman Park trail system. Park Commission should comment on trail recommendation in #4. Above. A void wetland buffer where feasible, enhance protection measures where encroachment is necessary. Draft protective covenants (with City as signatory) providing for occupancy requirements consistent with the approval herein and for the future maintenance of private roadway system and any other common areas. Require significant (size and quantity) landscaping to provide buffers along park boundary, Highway 7 and Eureka Road. Design should include evergreen trees and shrubs for year-round effectiveness. 9. Tree preservation plan should identify existing site vegetation. Plans may need to be modified to preserve significant trees on south side of wetland. . 10. Plans for the project shall comply with the drainage requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District with respect to quantity and quality of stormwater runoff. The amount of onsite ponding shall be sufficient to handle the amount of impervious surface proposed for the property. 11. The development of the property will comply with the requirements of Shorewood's Tree Preservation and Reforestation Policy. 12. The development of the property shall comply with the requirements of Shorewood's Wetland Code. 13. Development Stage plans shall address fire flow adequacy. If necessary, City agrees the structures shall be constructed with an internal sprinkler system. 14. It is understood that the Applicant does not intend to provide services which are exclusive to the elderly and that occupancy of the dwelling units will be limited to persons 62 years of age and older, pursuant to City, State and Federal requirements. 15. Within the Development Stage plan review the City shall explore ways to mitigate any impact of traffic associated with the project on the surrounding neighborhoods, however, overall traffic impact from the development shall not be a basis for denial at development stage. '-J " . Resolution No. 99- 008 Page 4 of4 16. The Applicant's Development Stage plans should include a pedestrian trail system along the west side of Eureka Road and along the south side of the wetland area, tying into the Freeman Park trail system. 17. Development Stage plans shall include a landscaping plan to provide buffering. , B. City Council approval of the Concept Plan is subject to all applicable standards, regulatioI).s, and requirements of the Shorewood City Code, including, but not limited to the following: 1. Section 1201.04, Subd. 1, regarding the procedures for review and approval of conditional use permits; . 2, Section 1201.06, Subd. 3, regarding special procedures for the establishment of a P.D.D. by conditional use permit; 3. Section 1201.03, Subd. 20, regarding the special requirements for elderly housing projects; 4. Section 1201.25, Subd. 6(b)(1), regarding the purpose of concept plan approval. C. Approval of the Concept Plan is not intended, nor does it act to grant approval of a Development Stage Plan or Final Stage Plan which are required pursuant to Section 1201.25, Subd, 5(c) and (d). Density is approved for up to 62 units, subject to reduction if that is necessary to comply with wetland or other regulations. The application of Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. for approval of the Concept Plan for the Shorewood Senior Housing P.D.D. as set forth above is hereby approved. . 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shore wood this 8th day of February, a ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR r.#4C.~ JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR .. " " . . . . EXHIBIT A Parcell The west 10 rods of the easterly 20 rods of lot 98, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Easterly 10 rods, front and rear, of Lot 98, Auditor's Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-Three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota, Lot 23, Meeker's Outlots of Excelsior, Parcel 2 That Parcel of land located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Lot 74, Auditor's Subdivision No. 133, according to the plat thereof on record at the office of the Register of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Containing 136,343 square feet more or less. Parcel 3 Part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 23 in Hennepin County Minnesota. \" . ) PARK COlVLYllSSION ~NUTES AUGUST U, 1997 . PAGE 5 Commissioner Puzak pointed out there is currently a substanciard driveway rhrough the park.. If a new public street is allowed co tie into that substandard driveway, be inquired whether there will be pressure to upgrade the driveway to a road. Nielsen nored there is not sufficient room to do that and there is no good purpose to go through there other than parle traffic coming and going. Commissioner Puzak expressed concern relative [0 the needs or the fire department. Nielsen stated the fire marshall has already reviewed the plaos and he is satisfied with the circulation. It has been recommended that the internal system be widened somewhat. Dallman moved, Puzak seconded approving the land swap; requesting the developer to tie into the development contract that a trail be built along the west side of Eureka Road from the public road to the Freeman Park entrance; that a trail be built along the south side of wetlands area and be tied into the Freeman Park system; subject to the recommendations of staff for a berm and fence to be built along outlot B to establish a buffer between the park and the development; and that the public road COJUlect to the park and tie into the eDsting park road. lVIotion passed 6/0. 7. . DISCUSSION OF PARK AND TRAIL PLAL'fNING WITH lVlutK KOEGLER . . Mark Koegler. Hoisington Koegler Group, met with the Commission to discuss park and trail planning. Chair Colopoulos commented on Mr. Koegler's memorandum of AU:toust 6. 1997, and pointed out that while there is strong support for a trail system, there is also strong opposition to the trail system. Mr. Koegler noted be was responding to the numbers of the survey. He sr.ared there are certain aspectS of the trail plan which will need to be updated. He suggested the Commission review the trail system to assure what is being looked at representS the minimum necessary to effectively link aU areas of the community which the Commission wants to be linked. Mr. Koegler stared at this point, he would like to build a common level of expectations and put together a scope of services. Chair Colopoulos felt the best place [0 start may be to identify the segments of the trail plan re!ative to their value to the community and from where their base of support is derived. He noted there are some elements which are recreation and others wbich relate to access and safety. Chair Colopoulos e."tplained a trai1 system is a conglomerntion of many different segments for different pUI]>oses. Chair Colopoulos noted many residents are opposed to the trail system. because they see it as a plan to place sidewalks throughout the city. Mr. Koeglerscared this is a misconception which needs to be addressed. Commissioner Puzak felt the Commission needs to further fOCtlS the vision in the mission statement which was written approximately a year 2:,0'0. He Stated be would like to take the discussion of a designated trail system and add some strtlCtUIe to it. Commissioner Puzak suggested on those roads designated feeder roads. the Commission propose a 6-fooc wide bituminous trail. Those trails interconnecting small communitiesy going throll~h parks. to wetlands or into sceriic are~ would be chip bark. The major thoroughfares witbin the city, such as Smithtown, might be off meet, protected by curb, gutter and buffer. U~y ft lL-A~ ql -fyO orA. pt\rK CovY\(II\, ~~ t\0+e~ Att. IV . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.net/shorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net . MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 15 April 1999 RE: Shorewood Ponds - Revised Development Stage Plans FILE NO.: 405 (99.03) At its 6 April meeting the Planning Commission tabled a request by Eagle Crest Northwest, Inc. for development stage approval of the Shorewood Ponds senior housing project. While staff reports from the Planning and Engineering Departments raised a number of issues relative to the plans, the two most significant reasons for tabling were related to screening and landscaping. Since then staff has met with the developer's landscape architect and the developer has submitted revised development stage plans. Following is how the revised plans comply with previous staff recommendations: 1. It was suggested at the public hearing that on-street parking be addressed through the use of permit parking. Shorewood's City Code is already set up for this approach, and it is recommended that reference to permit parking be included in the development agreement to be drafted in the final plan stage of the review process. 2. Per the Park Commission's recommendation the developer has shown a trail along the south side of the wetland and parallel to Eureka Road, north of the new street (see Exhibit A-I, attached). While the trail does encroach somewhat into the wetland buffer area, this type of encroachment is allowed by the Wetland Code. The developer's landscape plan provides for buffer area restoration. It is highly recommended that the trail be constructed immediately at the same time as the streets are constructed. The conservation easement to be granted to the City over the wetland buffer should include an easement for trail purposes. As an n t.~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER bA-Z Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds - Revised Development Stage Plans 15 April 1999 alternative the outlot for the designated wetland can be enlarged to include the buffer and trail area. 3. The property owner to the west of the existing south entrance to the park is concerned about losing his access to Highway 7. Staff will discuss this matter with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to explore whether or not one residential driveway may remain open. In the event that the driveway does not remain open to Highway, the property owner has been assured that the City will plow out the parking lot adjacent to his property at the same time as the new public street is plowed. 4. Any approval of the revised plans must be contingent upon the approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The Watershed District will not take action on the plans until the City has granted preliminary plat approval. . 5. The Park Commission has yet to act on staff s suggestion that the park road be closed off between the north and south parking lots in Freeman Park. If it is not closed off plans should be made to pave the road as soon as possible. 6. Exhibit B is a sample of age restrictions that were used in another project. These restrictions must be included in the protective covenants for Shorewood Ponds. 7. The landscape plan has been revised (see Exhibit A-I and A-2), addressing the previous recommendations of staff: . a. The plan provides a very good mixture of plant materials, relying heavily on evergreen trees for screening and buffering. Plant sizes are consistent with Shorewood's Code requirements. b. The tree preservation plan included with the proposed landscaping is very practical. Numerous trees on the site that would have otherwise been lost to construction are suitable for transplanting. It is recommended that approximately one half of the transplanted evergreen trees be used in the northeast comer of the site, to the north and east of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. c. Tree protection measures should be shown on the final grading plans for the project and must be in place prior to the start of construction. d. The landscape berm along the westerly side of the project has been extended to the north to enhance buffering for Lots 27 and 30, Block 2. 8. Since the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will not approve plans for grading, drainage, erosion control and wetland mitigation until the City has given -2- Memorandum Re: Shorewood Ponds - Revised Development Stage Plans 15 April 1999 preliminary plat approval, it is recommended that the City's approval be contingent upon the developer obtaining Watershed approval. 9. The developer has still not proposed street names for the public and private streets. These can be addressed with the final plat. Although the naming of streets has historically been left to the property owner (with City approval), it is suggested that the public street be named to reflect its function as an entrance to the park (e.g. "South Park Drive"). This will indicate to future buyers that the street will experience park related traffic. 10. The developer has yet to indicate whether the city utilities and the public street will be privately financed or whether the City will be requested to bond for these improvements. If bonding is requested the developer must submit a petition to the City Council making the request. . RECOMMENDATION The plans have been revised to address the most significant concerns raised in the previous staff reports. Subject to the review and comments of the City Engineer, it is recommended that the development stage plans be approved, subject to the following: 1. Parking restrictions and signage should be included in the final plans and incorporated into the development agreement to be drafted for the project. 2. The trail should be constructed at the same time the streets are constructed. 3. The conservation easement for the wetland buffer area should include a trail easement, or the outlot for the wetland should be enlarged to include the wetland buffer area and the trail. . 4. Staff will continue to work with the property owner to the west of the existing park entrance and with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to address property access. 5. Any approval by the City is contingent upon the developer receiving approvals by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 6. Age restrictions such as those shown in Exhibit B must be included in the . protective covenants for the project. 7. If the park road between the north and south parking lots is not closed off, it is recommended that it be scheduled for paving as early as this construction season. -3- Memorandum Re: . Shorewood Ponds - Revised Development Stage Plans 15 April 1999 8. At least one half of the evergreen trees to be transplanted should be relocated to the north east corner of the site. 9. Trees to be transplanted must be identified and tagged before relocation. 10. Final plans must include a cost estimate or bid for landscaping and tree preservation improvements, from which a letter of credit will be required. The letter of credit must be one and one half times the amount of the estimated costs and must extend for two growing seasons. 11. The development agreement should address provisions for fencing that may be requested by the future homeowner's association. . 12. Final grading plans should include tree protection measures. Required fencing and signage must be in place prior to any construction taking place. 13. Consideration should be given to a public street name that reflects the street's function as a park entrance. 14. The street signage plan for the project should include a <<Freeman Park Entrance" sign at the intersection of the new street and Eureka Road. 15. The developer must indicate whether public utilities and the public street will be privately financed, or whether City bonding will be requested. Cc: Park Commission Jim Hurm Larry Brown Tim Keane Bill Gleason Fran Hagen . -4- . . g .. ~ ~ ~ . wood ro e8&tOnC: Services. Inc.. - ~ -:- _. -- ==- ~: .."_ .h~ c c. '''''. ,,'>:' . _ ~". ",_ '-'-on . ,_ .. '. t '\ ". ~: / ,. --. ". \ I ~ ""~ ., \: ..l, r _. \. , .~ II \ ; '\.1' ........\\ l "" d: I. ".A- .""'w "'. e f<~ : to. ...\~ I', -l -..... . "<", \:. \. \ \.... " i,:'< 2. .,..~- 1: . >. I.' , :..,; " . \ \.' ',' 'J ..-' i , t . , I : \"', :'. i i . \ . ~"'. - '"f I :(..,...::; \ __.;..::: :or ! , ,~ "\'" u~ \~ ~ ), \...... -l :"L,. -l " -l _.~..~-- . ,. ,.-r' r( -l -l ....' ',' . ~: -l i I I (l .i ) ,- i ." l i ( ,. / ../" / ~-~,.'-':. 2730.. ..... \;.:"':-- . . . ':',"".--'~""'..., ..~~""" '0,;:,\:\:.:";.... .~'. I L.. ....j n. ! I .J ~ ! as' !: 01.: r t. I ' Ill! ~: ~, ... i 11)! f' ~, <', . "~'! ..' 1':'11 ~i 218si~.; 01. :ti ol,:I 'j. J j.~,,! .:. ti9"'~ . 1 .,l.:1;! tlooo, i. j i t f. . I gl!!' g i- !i ~, %i~r .....' " --';.--. !: c ] '" Westwood : "''''~1.. ...... :.0, !~..~. ,.,,~. f"1"" .....t. :"'1!'X'I!::l tl,' ...." ," 1';~;C<i--. or,. ~~~~'~~~~~~?t:~~~'~:~>:~_ :'!~..Ii_l' .,~,.t;' - -_._.._---~:":.:.-~:.._:- ....._-~-:.;~~ I-l':~... _______~_~~_ fth....%f::..t~,u~::~~:i PlWPA1U!D fOR EAGLE CREST NORTIIWEST, me. ',0. BOX 47333 UINNllAPOUS, MINNESOTA'~ ~ ~~"HS::<"';~ ~~""":'4':S.. ...; h.........'...u.-._. ";~~ .z, &..1.00.0, WI. ~~.:.t.! f,l: (.e:'-2~e~ \ , r--,;'\ O' z' r\ 4:\ 3:, :I: \ 0\ -\ ~\ 1-\ i' ~\ '. (fl z\ ','; ~\ : \ \ o. '\ ~ \. . \ ~ 1 i \ " \ 1 . , \ \ i \ ; ~ '. \ \ , . \ \ \ . \ i i . , , ' '\ \ \, i; ~ : ; \::.': "i ,. .', I "" \ \ \ ,. , ~--\ .-~ \ \ \ \ ~~ ,: I~O' Call 48 Hours before dig9in9:' .. GOPHER STATE ONE CAL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn, Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 FOUNDATlON PLANTlNGS - T' _. Jl!!I t: _. PLANT UST WETlAND SEEDING 1m' COMNOH .....E,/BOTANlCAl. .....E OTY. S12EIROOT AlI_______ 8w 81_ _nut/_. ... , 2.!5'" 88 end crwat<<l .-tIand ..... Dc -.0 " HockIoooTy/Colllo _..... s 2.5" B8 wfth tn. foIowWag. MIld mbnur. c":. Cl.4 Grw.> -IF_ P"""_ 2 3.0" sa the rate of 16-18 ... P1.S/~ Cl.4 GrOM -IF_ p....,._... 13 TIGt8PlGntlld - DO' 8-10 IbL Pl.Sj.... SOl 5uoor' _1_ _.Nm 5 3.0" Be clrtlocl: SM 5uoor' _1_ _._ 8 T.........l<Ml 38X \ AS. Am_ LRIon/ll1a -. 13 2.S' 88 BIo __ (PLSJ ~,. ....... -,IPinoo _ 20 s'sa ,"" C<<lOCIa WIld R~ &A.S) ws ""'... 5pN..~ ,...... 72 S' 88 '0,; Swft'" _ Pl.S ws ......_".."..,...... '4 Tran~tecl ,0,; In""'" 9"- (:sl RSC ~ SpI....., Qoab/lllal.. "', 'Rid SpI..dar' 17 US' III 10,; 8... .klint tn* bulk.~ \ sse Spr1n; s.- Qoab/Waluo op. 'Spr1n; _' '0 '.5.88 Z< _""(Wk""",,,,") RID Rid TwI_ ~jComuto _ 33 ,36" Pot Ill: ::" ~""fJ~:..;:r' Ell" Emerald "aund --'/LanIaora lC)Ilaoltum 'Em_d ......r '55 '2' Pot 3l< I AI< -- H....._il1JG'an_ __ '^,--Io' 62 36' Pal Ill: Clan! ___ (..,. _ FSS F.... __ Soalj 155 2 Yr. Pot ,Oll: Canl ll"l" (.... _,) , TY ToY'Iton ',,/Tea.. )C mecIa 'launton" 62 24" Pot \ T.Il --...- 1larlNrry/llo<W'lt "'utIl>er;ll 'Th,,",,_' 155 18" Pot or _F....j 310 2 Yr. Pot JJ Japoa<- "'nl>or/JunlaoNo _ 155 2.(. Pot lIE Dwarf _ u..n~jEuoft...... ..... .Compo..... 62 .)6" Pet 80 81ue ~JkefIctOtrtr:hon~_ ",,, .2 Yr. Pot I ". Mugho Pw..jPin... mugho mugnu. 62 24" Pot I QIl) CorDI Moode Oaphne/'Oaphne :I burkwoodi 'CareI MDdQeo '<>5 18" Pot , Sl _an .../ltlS 1Ilb..... 3'0 2 Yr. Pot i PLANTlNG NOTES \ \\: \ ~c 1 CO' NOTFORCONSTRUcnON LEGEND . )I( & ElOSnNG tREE TO REMAIN EXlSnNG tREE TO BE REMOVED EXlSnNG tREE TO BE 1RANSPLANlEO --9~(.___ DENOlES PROPOSED CONTOURS 80 TREE PRESERVA TlON PROPOSED NEW PLANnNGS " lllANSPLANlED lllEES 'eta 1,... tw' SIte: 148 10\011,.... Sowd (lnctuan ~antwd t.-.-: "4 Total 1~ Lmt: .)4 Total.... _. v.. 8"-1": 16 (Roqu_ _..t-:J2 v..) Total Icwt deciduau. tr'Ma 12"+: 5 (RfICp.Ihld f'III'6oclam~t- 1$ w..) Totd lost ~ tNa (all 0..,. 12'): 1S (RequtreC "CIIClIrMftt- 3D ."...) Totclf ~~ 77 v... ContnH:br "011 ~ two ,... .....,.m.. of 011 pknt ,"oUrtaiL 1M peront.- ..... on th. data of tM LDn~ Ardthac:t'. writMrI ~ ot the initial planth;.. ~t Pant ~ .....1 atao how 0 .. ,.cr VUOl'Wta.. CClI'IImenC:rl9 &4lO'l ptcmtinl), All phJftta to k .lii 41~t.. 1'0.... f>>td/rr hanty. PIcinb to be lMIaIed _ p.- atoltOord- ANt p1O'1ting ~ u...m.._12"......~....._ and 8" an_ (___ of.....). Stoicftg of tr-. optIartd: ~ 1f" IIIOt p6umb Oftr _,...-. ~ aJI'MWooth-bat"-l er-. f.nn top eN botlam. -.byAprl/', Opwn tap of. burtap on 88 ~ twnDlM pot 11'1 ~ JlIintr. .It end ...... apart PMt pots. fiIrvM JllMu 01; ~ - .... ~ ....." prlDCGCt _d to CIft'Ie't ,oor ~ --"'~""--___""Can_. Pk.nb'lhclI be hlfteCltrt.i7 p6ont:MI.....n.a at'... ,.,.,.,.,.......,-.kt ~ If ~ ternpanll'y GnIy.. AI.~.__ to'M NiIIded.Yi_ otiMrwtM not.d; Hd to be.CWIdai'cI"~ one hol"dY'*'eor- nx. :"::t ="':: ...Mallfnlrnhawtt.. ~w.~ m:.:. CIftG ...,....... ., tIdh- The IldgInO IfIdI be PlGCId with athOOtt. Ccoot-..-. - ...._ _ _ "0.. c.or (4II4-<lOCl2) .. _ ...__ uUO. ............ ~": :. ez =::"~' at 474-.32:\6 .. ....... . -.....- __GO _ .... at. Sonne __... AU .,.. protec:tkr1 m....... lIhaIl be IftM:alled prier to buldng cOMtnu:Uon. Conloct' the CIty S'tc:nwoocl Ptcarmftg ~. ot 474-3236 ... G SIt. ~ upan ~ of k1na.cape tnmIkftjon. I . , i :, \ Exhibit A-I LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION [ " \:1 .". " CO 0\ x \ \ \ " .". \\' . '':i~\ ~,! , ' "}' , .,., . \~'" ;r I( 1\ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \t \ \, \ \ \\ \ I \ \ tl1 \ >< ~ \ \ )>- I IV \ \ ~ ... LEGEND '.OUNDA nON,' PLANl1NGS ':,-", '.'TYP.'; . . '. ; '.' .;.,.. . liP, ;< :,1, i,;\!;{ ,';./, ' . . . ",'~ .' i. t, .t". '.1':' . '\ ~ ~..... <:{( P:/ . - . EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN "f,': "n" i :- ~~; I~ t~:;!s1,~ I.... " ,t, ' 't'. ~ ( " t.r '",',\ ::!{} , ~t .",' , "<1<' :,:;.>. .::': , '.'; '1\';.i.1'~1lP~' · ~;.';",T' t'; ~:.. ,',' .;: '"i '.:.~'..t ~.. (,'f-::' iL~~, EXISllNG TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED --- 980 00 0() TREE PRESERVATION . .:~: '.;.:':{;," :..,. j~\ \\L f: .' ;-::: ,,~~." lC' If (I'i' "":"i?.'(n:~::~!;"~ .';j;"'_~" ,,~::A ;. .' .:." ",;::~ I..t;' \,:;': , .,:.... ~, " ' . I :t ',' --- ,. '?;:.\:'~!;~};'\"~i; ~TLAND SEEDI~G '1'" .:t~:;. :;~:;I~: QTY. SlZE/ROOT '" All : dlalurb.d : wtttland, "~&4nci,' btatf.~,,".' it; :':,,:: 1 2.S- BB " ond c,-.oted.weUond thGlbe,~;..' ::.::;;' 9 2,5- BB with, the foIIom9 Ned m~CIt;.:. /'.:;r'I;' It the rote of 1S';"18 Ib.. PLS/aer" .: '.: ,!J .,' , 2 3.0 BB broodcolt.or 8-10 IbL ,PLS/acre If'.~:'ft},~ 13 Trotlaplont.d' drUled: . i.. ::'.1'. ..,. , . ,', ;_,:;.~",l, 5 3.0 BB . ' . , . " , " . 8 ~~t'.&:nttd 38" . 819 BIiI_tern ~):"'. ,;:, .,!..~. '" /(.; ~~ 8' BB 15'" ConocJC; ,Wid R~. (~)', ,.' ~r,"i;}.:':\~'; 72 S'PS 10" . Swl\Ch ~' ' 0 ,; " "." : t..'; ',;':-;.,... ~; J~~.:~anted ~g: " ~~~t'~ l~k' ~4tj; "';>.,:.~' 10 1.5- BB 2" WIld r)M '(bulk'w8f9ht)., . : (" :'." "" 33 38- Pot 1" ere.n bUlru.JbUlk.~t);.: , :.::,::~' 155 12- Pot J" Wad '9'0" '(ble' '1r-'9ht);:;,.)",;,/~. ~:5 :. ~8~t;~t. 1~: ~~:r;:;r~(~:'-'~~J.:: :"~i\ ~:5 ~: ~:: . , :' .> ';".:\';;"" ';.'1;:..:; /" :.-';i':::; ~~g '~4l\:t"I" ..., ....,~, , ,:)h:';;\~/!ji;i 1::~\~ r:s : 3801 Pot I .' ..., .~. . 'il .q.., , .\... .!,~L I, '!,\-'l t~ · f:l~::": \ ' " ';:"i;~'::';,'i:::}t:~:;'}f\t~~i; li~ . "I -.' . " ,... . ." ..,." "t' .,.-~;~.:,.~.fl.-.3 PLANTING NOTES ." '. '.' ,;"., :\ <",;,!:~::,,!i:'!9' , Conttoctor sholl prollfde two )!ear vuaronte. of AU" plo"t materlol.. The vuorant., . begin. on' Ute d~te 01 .the ~dticop.~it.#,t"'~);':::\i;.::', '~:'ki:;;, :r~~9~c:ceptonee of thl lItltlal plantlnv. R.p1o~..t plant 1Jl9t.1011 ....011 al.~ h~... ca' ~~ )'ICN'.gu~t~ '~~~~'.~~i"\!') ..:'V.:;), ./(~~; 'i' " " t, ~.t ....1. fl'q,/ All plant. to be Minnesota-grown OIld/or hardy. Plante to be Inetalled as per .tondord ANt planting proctlc... . ' ; :: :. .;;':' ;<', ..~;;.~)" U.. minimum 12- 10<Jm planting solon trees and 8" on thrub. (sldee and bottom of hole). "~ ' "; "'~l":')~ DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS . 't" ~, . " PROPOSED NEW PLANTINGS & TRANSPLANTED TREES '. .: . . .,' ~ ~..' i ~ . 'j',.' \.:i;':;'~:!<.; .:';;:/!.;'\ . .1' '''.1, > , . r J.~~,;,~ i " '.~ ~ ~l;\':~: ',' . I t ~" I , , Totol Tre.. on Site: 148 Total Tree. Saved (Includ.. transplanted troes: Totol Tr.... Lolt: 34 114 Tatol 10lt declduoul tree. 8"-11": 18 (Required replacement...; 32 tre.s) Totol 10lt declduou. treet 12"+: 5 ~Re<tulred roplacem(lflt- 15 tree.) Totol 10lt conlferoul tree. (011 OVer 12): 15 (Required replacement...... 30 tree.) Total ...placement~ 77 tree. ' Stoking of tree. optional; repo~lIt1on If not plumb aft.... ono year, Wrap 011 emooth-barked tree.. fa"", tOp and bottom~ Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on ee materloll; remove pot on potted plante; .pllt and break aport peat pob. Prune plant. a. nece..ory - p. .tand~d nu,..ery practice and to correct poor branChing. Owner eholl be responsible for malntenanc. otter initial watering by Contractor. Plante ahall be immediately planted upon arrival at .Ite. Properly h.el-In material. If neee..ary. t.mporary only, All disturbed area. to b. .odded unle.. otherwl.e noted: .od to be .tondord Mlnne.ota-grown and hardy blueoroM mix, All thrub pl(lntlnQ beds ehall have 4- or' shredded bark mulch and volley-view poly edglne,). the edging thalli be placed with 8mQOth. curve. at lealt three fHt from th. cent.,.. of ev.gr..... tr.... '. ': ; PLANT LIST KEY BW H GA GA SM SU At SP WS WS RSC sse RID EMH AH fSS 1Y Toe OF. JJ Vtf; 90 UP CUD 51 COUMON NAME180TANICAt NAME BlocJc Wolnut/~glon. nlgro Ho~kberty/C.ItI. occldentons Green AIh/F'roxlnUI pennl)fvonlca: Grten Aeh/F'roxlnua pennl)4vonlcQ Suvor t.Aoplt/Ac:er IIOccharum Sugar t.AClple/Acer locchorum American Undtn/TIlo omerloono Scotch PIn.~InU8 8)4""ltrl. \\tIlte SprtJce~lceo g1OUC<l \\tilt. spru~~l<:e~IOUC<l , Red Splendor Crab ofu. sp. 'Red Spl.ndor. Spring Snow Crob oIUI 'p. 'Sprlng Snow' Red TwlOgltd OQ9Wood/CornuI serleea Emerold Mound Hont)'*Jdd./lonlcero x)4aateum 'Emerald Uound' Annabelle H)drangeol",ydrongeo arborelCOn. . Annobelle. fol.. Solomon. Seot/ ' . Taunton Vew,lroxu. )( ",edlo 'Taunton' Thornle.. Japan... BOrberry/Berberl. thunb.rvlf .T'tlornl.... O.lrlch Feml Jl2pgorden Junlptlf I Junlperut procumbena Dworl WInged Euon)'mu./[uon)mu,' oIoto 'Compacto' Blue OotgrouM"'ototrlchon .empervli"enl , Mugho Plne,IPinul mugho mughus Carol Mock'. OOphne/Doi>hne l< i)urtcwoodl 'Corol Mackie" Siberian Irll/trla ~lblrlco '. .' . ' :. (.~";;' . ';' ,:'..:; '~' ;'..', ~:. :l.. .', ,. " , . , ; ~ . ., , Contractor shaH contact Gopher Statt -One Call" (464-0002) to verify underground 'utllty 10000Uon.. Contact the City Planning Department at 474-3236 to orrange a procon.trucllon conference with the City Sonlng Adnllnl.trator' prior to ony land disturbance, , ,'. t\ 1\\,\ \ . All tree protection meosure. ehall be Inltlalled prior to bulldJhg. construction, ' I ,,' ~,. '. Contact the Clly Shorewood Plonnlng Deportment at 474-3236 for a Site Inspoctlon upon completion of lond.cope fnataHatlOf1: ... " -r" j',. .. "'i, II · ~PL..E Section 3. Sians. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot or in the Common Area, except that the Declarant shall be permi tted to erect and maintain upon the Property such signs as it deems appropriate to advertise the development until the Declarant conveys the last Unit. Section 4. Miscellaneous. All sporting equipment, toys, and other equipment and supplies necessary or convenient to residential living shall be enclosed or shall be screened from view. No boats or recreational vehicles shall be stored by an Owner unless stored inside a Garage. In addition, no television or radio antenna shall be erected or placed on the exterior of any Home. Section 5. Outdoor Storaae. No boats, cars, campers, or other personal property shall remain outdoors for more then 48 consecutive hours. . Section 6. Private Road. It is understood that the private streets within the plat shall be maintained by the Developer or his successors in interest, including the appropriate homeowner's association and will not be accepted or maintained by the City until such time as it is made to conform to the standards which exist for public streets at the time of request for acceptance. ARTICLE XIV SENIOR HOUSING Section 1. Aae of Residents. This neighborhood is for senior citizens only. All residents must be at least sixty-two (62) years of age. The only exception to this age limitation is that one caregiver can reside in the residence, if and only if a caregiver is medically necessary and not merely incidental to the living arrangement. Section 2. Number of Residents. The maximum number of residents per unit is two, exclusive of a caregiver. ARTICLE XV GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Duration and Bindina Effect. The easements created hereby shall be permanent and the covenants and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall run with and bind the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Association or any Owner, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of twenty (20) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time said covenants and restrictions shall be automatically renewed for successive periods of ten (10) years. 19 Exhibit B SAMPLE AGE RESTRICTIONS .( . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD' SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927' (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DA TE: 20 April 1999 RE: Smith, Ron - Appeal Zoning Administrator's Interpretation of Fence Regulations FILE NO.: 405 (99.06) Mr. Ron Smith, 20445 Radisson Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), proposes to build a six-foot high boundary line fence between his and his neighbor's property. The proposed fence, shown on Exhibits B and C is a typical board-on-board design, except that the spacing of the boards is closer than what Shorewood has allowed in the past. Mr. Smith has appealed staff's interpretation of the fence requirements. Section 1201.03 Subd.2.f.(9)vi. states: "All boundary line fences in residential districts shall be constructed in such a manner that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the plane between the ground and the top of the fence constructed is open." This provision was adopted in the mid 1980's, partly for structural reasons and partly for aesthetic reasons. The intent of this provision is to allow air and light to pass through the fence, precluding solid fences or walls along property boundary lines. At the time the Code was adopted, the City was particularly concerned about stockade fences. The board on board design has been well accepted in recent years, largely because it looks the same on both sides and affords a considerable amount of privacy. In Shorewood's case it can also be constructed to comply with the 25 percent open requirement. What has been allowed in the past is a design that includes l"x 6" boards no .. " ::~!;<.,r=J ON q~-:', :=_.:s ::.:,;;;= .. '0-1 Memorandum Re: Smith Fence Appeal 20 April 1999 spaced four inches apart on one side of 2"x 4" cross members, with alternating boards and spaces on the other side of the cross members (see Exhibit E). Although the fence appears solid when viewed from ninety degrees, the 2"x 4" cross members create a two inch space for air and light to pass through at an angle. Even this has been considered to be a liberal interpretation of the Code, since lumber sizes are nominal (Le. a l"x 6" board actually measures %" x 5Yz", and a 2'x 4" board is only lYz"x 3Y2"). Mr. Smith proposes that the l"x 6" b~ards be spaced only 1 7/8", as shown on Exhibit C. Based on his calculations, shown in Exhibit D, this would satisfy the 25 percent open requirement if there was only one side to the fence. However, the boards are spaced on the other side so as to create only %" of space when viewed at an angle. In staff's interpretation, this does not comply with the Code. . Staff has agreed to an informal appeal process whereby the Planning Commission and City Council would direct staff as to the correct interpretation of the fence requirements. If a majority of the City Council agrees with Mr. Smith, the fence permit will be issued as requested. It should be noted that Mr. Smith has stated that his neighbor has agreed with the proposed design of the fence. . Cc: Jim Hurm Larry Brown Joe pazandak Ron Smith . -2- ~ \ 3.0..8VN ,. 'l81 ........_1 ~ ~ ~V\N~J't'? .. r.... ..... ............................... ....... ........ .... ............ .............. ............ .......; ; ........-.... . I~ 'IS : ..$L\ f I P:1G1C1iV CIIIMO~31S ~(bIJ.'31lmS3IU 31IU .dIO AI3Il31~31~ 98 ',/0 15'3 (0 v t601J.~31llaDS3lM iN! :l0l AU31AiI~i1~ (9)) J G'~ '" '~" t1.~ (SZ) 91 K 101 !o'"", ~ 101 lA08 (ILi)! (II ) GL ..... . . 2 101 1A09 ~ epeJE) uw 'pOOM<JJOlIS 'p~ uUI uOSSJpeN Sttol uon-eAalH aJuatl uaaJJS - a;)uap!sa~ \llTWS ..{h [ = ..UI [ :01""5 I I f :~ ~~ .. ~ r,: \'/ . "t:': .. .' ., " !.l .(~ .. t~~ .... t:' : " sde . IL II 1 pnJO newe JUpe l gx l sl!el:j IUIUOZPOH JUpa~ l II f;rxG (8) '0'0 lIG/l. B -,9 - slsod JUpa8 1.1# txv ..96 . . .C:Il l .~~ Ol " It, o ~ ~ .....r, ;>- IJ;:l ~ ~ I IJ;:l U"8 ZV1 ... 0 IJ;:l o. ~o l- 00... ~ ~V1 ~r:/)""" ....0 ~ .-'~ u .00'- :2"",,0. ><_ 0. ~=..< );.'"Ctrl 'D ~:>< '2. 0 2: (SO '"C g ~ 0- gC/)() 0/," ~ ""tJt;::l d":rj d~ :1.Z ~. () trJ I ....., o '"C < - trJ .... ... . ,'........"..""T,,v.-.."""_,~_~.~_~.,~-:<-.~"~ _. .... .. . . ,~. . 4x4 Poot lx6 Vert. Board , , \., ~~ /'\.~ .~ 'I, ~ V ~.., : ~ Scale: 1" = 2" mith Residence - Screen Fence Elevation 445 Radismn Inn Road, Shorewood, Mn. . RS Cedar Horz. Spacers . . ".- ." .. . ..... ."... ........~ --"'~-'-cr-""""'-___--"_~'_'~""________ , Ci;) -'" "- Ci;) ~, "- 0-> U) U) U) 0-> /'..) U1 (D " 'i; ,':" en 0-> /'..) I to /'..) Ci;) I 10 U1 (D U1 H < ~ rn -l () ~ -0 o :~ '-l H 2 -0 ~ fT1 Ci;) -'" 04/07/1999 12:58 612-920-2585 IWCREST CORPORATION PAGE 02 !sm1lli~_.,: . .,. ". . . .". '. . .. . . : ,. '>~..,.: .~. ',' '~'~;';';', ,.....",:". ~;::: .t..._ ,.. '.~.' Total Square Inches per Fence Section -72lfH x 99.5"L = 25% of Plane from Ground to Fence Top = Total Open Space Required = 7,164 Sq. In. ....J( 25% . 1,791 Sq. In. Less Open Space between Grade & bottom of Fence Boards - 96- x 1.5'" = 144 Sq. In. Less Open Space between Fence Boards - 13 x 70.S"H x 1.875'W ;: 1.718.44 Sq. '0. Total Open Space per Plan = 1,862.44 Sq. In. % Open Space - 1,862.44 Sq. In. + 7,164 Sq. In. = 26% . . Exhibit D APPLICANT'S CALCULATIONS -25% OPEl' v m W a. ! I ~ H ~, ~; o & 8 ~ ~ H to lD to N I m N Ul I N N lD lD to C'I ..... Ul Ul Ul H "- I"- m "- v m _."'....;...;---'..._'_.....~--'.._~~~~--'"----~.. .. .. . I "-""--~.... .'_ ~ .A .~. A .... - .. .. .. _ -~__....~~..lk~~CI..~~ 'UW 'pOOM;uoqs 'peo}! UUI um9JP~ 9f uon~AaIH a~uatl uaa.os ... a:>uap'S~lI l{1!t; )~..t ~ I .: ~c.<,' ~l\ )f 'y /., ~./~ " ,/. -{'1- SJ~~HJI?~~ · " " /' /' ~~~,,~ r\" " -a-$-. ". ". II' ". ". ". ., ., ., ., .}SOcl ~x~ . . c: V p., o tf 'n 01 4-< o c: o 'g .... ~ fr l!) .$ ~~: ~o e ~ Q.c .~ ~'@ u.l'~ .~ ~u bO .0 c:: ....z.... ~~.5 u.lr-.N TO: Shorewood Planning Commission FROM: Ron and Nancy Smith DA TE: April 20, 1999 RE: Building Permit Application for side yard fence. Specifically, compliance with City Code 9 vi (Ordinance 168, 6/24/85). . A ttached are exhibit documents for the Planning Commission regarding the fence requirement clarification that we have discussed with Brad Neilsen. . Calculations . Fence Cross Section . Fence Elevation . City Ordinance . The city code is simple and clear. The calculations attached show that we have met these requirements. Our landscape architect, Mark Lumry with IvyCrest Corporation, has designed a fence meeting all of the city's specifications, and supplied the supporting calculations. We are extremely hopeful that the Planning Commission can endorse this plan. We have followed the correct procedures and would desperately like to get our fence built. This is the only subject on which we and our neighbor have concurred. This will be an aesthetically pleasing, well constructed part of the overall landscape plan, designed to help separate our properties which face one another directly as can be seen on the attached elevation drawing. Thank you for your serious consideration, and, we hope, your approval. RES:NHS " 6-Z. 20445 Radisson Inn Road - Fence Code Calculations Screen Fence Cross Section depicts continuous 26% open space on all planes from the ground to the top & thru the fence per the Shorewood City Code - Section 1201.03 Subd 2f Fences - Section (9) vi. Total Square Inches per Fence Section -72"H x 99.5"L = 25% of Plane from Ground to Fence Top = Total Open Space Required = 7,164 Sq. In. x 25% . 1,791 Sq. In. Less Open Space between Grade & bottom of Fence Boards - 96" x 1.5" = 144 Sq. In. Less Open Space between Fence Boards - 13 x 70.5"H x 1.875"W = 1.718.44 Sq. In. Total Open Space per Plan = 1,862.44 Sq. In. . % Open Space - 1,862.44 Sq. In. + 7,164 Sq. In. = 26% . 7011 1 1/2 96" ? 4x4 #1 Cedar Posts - 8'- 3 1/2" O.c. , (3) 2x4 #1 Cedar Horizontal Rails / / , - - - --' - - - - - - - - - . - - - - i- - - i-- - - - - - . - : 1 x6 ~ 1 Cedar a.1 ernatir 9 Board v 'I 1 7/f" 3aps; .- - - .'. .. ..' ..- i- - --' - ~ - - - - - -- - 2" - - - - - - - - - - I-- - - . - ~ - - i- l- i- - I-- - - - - - - - - i- l- I- - - - - - - " - .---~--'.'. --........ .. "'- Grade Scale: 11/2" = 1'-0" Smith Residence - Screen Fence Elevation '1" 1 Ir n. -1i,~t:", T'ln p()(1n ~h()r0'Mnnr1 l\lfn . . 4x4 Post \flvy@test/" Scale: 1" = 2" Smith Residence - Screen Fence Cross Section 20445 Radisson Inn Road, Shorewood, Mn. 2x4 RS Cedar Horz. Spacers ,Ex. Asphalt Driveway Neighbor's d Ramp Skateboar . lit ~rampohne Lawn 6' Ht. Wood Fettce --:1_ New _ , ..., ~ Lawn ~ 'c ~....<z ~J) . . .. "'') I I J f i ..... ~ ,?" J. .,,f/~ "".' ~. . ~..... /' ./ " ,.~ ~.~J . ;':J . ~.~; . ~;'J.. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hur:m, City Administrator !~ FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: April 22, 1999 RE: Consideration of Extension of Utilities to Shorewood Ponds At the time of publication, the feasibility report for this item was still in print. This item will be forwarded to the City Council on Friday. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 I I I Noble Road I Streets, Utilities I and Appurtenant Work I I City Project Number : 99-01 I for the I I I I CITY OF SHOREWOOD I I WSB Proj. No. lIS 1.00 April 26, 1999 Submitted to: I City of Shorewood I 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 I .A. 350 Westwood Lake 0tIice I 8441 Wayzata Boulevard tf-1 WSB Minneapolis. MN 65426 612-641-4800 .1 & AsaociDta, Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~~~~ ~~c~ "W~CQ\ ~ t= ~ C.' ~~~~ ~E::~~ t=~~~ ~~~~ ~~~"W ~~C~ ~~~~ ~~u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q\ Q\ Q\ ~ '<5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l:::l ~ ~ ~ l:::l ~~~\Q ::~l:::l~ k' """i L.... t ~ ~ ~~-~~~ ~C:::: ~~ ~~~~~~ .... ~ -. ~ I ~ ~l:::l.s ..~~ ~ ~ l:::l .f:3.- I ~ - N - ~. ~ ~'"?-.~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,f~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (? . .i) r!J1J CT> C::::::.c CT> c:::::'~ $'2 = .-i llJ1l c-J (Qg: 11illJ<C 1 >> j [O-:-~.._ ~ !Xl ~_i ./3 5 ~ ;:i. e l .s- =::: oS ~~ lie/.. ~Clo. I;iojcS l~ c::l~ l:lI;~ ~JoO oQliIot~ ~ .s-~ ,0:::; . .... "= .... c::ll:cS c::lc::l~ ~~13 c::lo~ ~ ... <::l ~:s( <::ll~ .s- \l ~ Uti;;Oli:: ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I ... wss B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 Re: Feasibility Report Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report which addresses the reconstruction of Noble Road from Grant Lorenz Road to approximately 670 feet west. We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please don't hesitate to contact me at 541-4800 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. .~$~ Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Project Manager Enclosure nm Infrastructure Engineers Planners EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~I/~ Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Date: April 26, 1999 Reg. No. 19103 City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 ... 1t1L$8 4__.lrrc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 Authorization 2 2.2 Scope 2 2.3 Data Available 2 3. GENERAL BACKGROUND ........................................3 3.1 Project Location 3 3.2 Existing Conditions 3 3.2.1 Streets 3 3.2.2 Storm Sewer 3 3.2.3 Sanitary Sewer 3 3.2.4 Watermain 3 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.1 Street 4 4.2 Storm Sewer 4 4.3 Sanitary Sewer 5 4.4 Watermain 5 4.4.1 Option 1) Traditional Open Cutting 5 4.4.2 Option 2) Directional Boring: 5 4.5 Sidewalk 6 4.6 Private Utilities 6 4.7 Permits / Approvals 6 4.8 Rights-of- Way / Easements 6 5. FINANCING..................................................... 7 5.1 Opinion of Cost 7 5.1.1 Noble Road Improvement 7 5.1.2 Optional Watermain Improvements 7 5.2 Funding 7 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION ........................... 9 APPENDIX A .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 FIGURES 10 APPENDIX B ......................................................... 15 OPINION OF COST 15 City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 ... 1t1L$8 4__./",,- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Noble Road project includes the reconstruction of the street on Noble Road beginning at Grant Lorenz Road and extending approximately 670 feet west as shown on Figure No.1. The proposed street improvements include the construction of 670 feet of a 24-foot wide residential urban street consisting of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter, and subgrade correction. Utility improvements include the construction of lateral storm sewer system and inspection and repairs of the existing sanitary sewer. The proj ect, as originally proposed and as contained in this Feasibility Report, does not include watermain extension to this project area. Currently, the City's watermain ends on Noble Road, approximately 1,100 feet west of the project limits. The Feasibility Report includes an estimate ofthe probable cost of extending watermain to this project area for informational purposes. The project cost is estimated at $166,650, which includes a 10% contingency and 30% indirect costs. Funding for the Noble Road reconstruction project will be provided by the local street fund as indicated in the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 1 ... WS8 4 A.uoclotn. Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization The Director of Public Works authorized preparation of the Feasibility Report in accordance with the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This project has been designated as City Project No. 99-01. 2.2 Scope This report addresses the reconstruction of street and utility improvements for Noble Road from Grant Lorenz road extending approximately 670 feet west. Eight single- family lots have access onto Noble Road within the project limits. The proposed improvements include reconstruction of streets, storm sewer and sanitary sewer inspection, cleaning, and necessary maintenance and repairs. Currently, this section of Noble Road does not contain watermain. The original project scope also did not include constructing watermain, however, to better understand the financial impacts of extending watermain to this area, two alternatives, along with their associated probable costs, were studied. 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: · City of Shorewood Record Plans for Noble Road · City of Shorewood Topography Maps · City of Shorewood Storm Water Management Plan City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 2 ... W$8 .t .4RocIa1n.lnc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. GENERAL BACKGROUND 3.1 Project Location Noble Road is located in the northwestern portion of Shorewood beginning at Grant Lorenz Road and extending approximately 670 feet west. 3.2 Existing Conditions This section of Noble Road was constructed in the early 1980's without storm sewer, watermain or curb and gutter. Drainage from adjoining properties flows to the street and then along the street edges to the lower lands at each end of the project area. Sanitary sewer was constructed in conjunction with oriflinal street construction. - ~ 3.2.1 Streets: Noble Road is a 24-foot bituminous surfaced street with no curb and gutter constructed in 1983. The section of Noble Road west of this project area was reconstructed with sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and curb and gutter. The inplace street is in a deteriorated condition with ruts in several areas. The existing sub grade materials consist of frost susceptible material, which have resulted in frost heaves in the winter and soft spots in the spring. In addition, the eastern end of the project area is most likely constructed over a deep pocket of compressible soils. 3.2.2 Storm Sewer: Noble Road drains mainly to the east with a portion draining to the west. The east end of Noble Road drains to existing bituminous spillways and into an existing ditch along Grant Lorenz Road. The ditch flows north through a 36-inch culvert and into a wetland approximately 300 feet north of Noble Road. The western section of Noble Road drains to the west to existing curb and gutter and storm sewer constructed by previous street improvements. 3.2.3 Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer system was constructed in the 1980's and consists of 8-inch and 10-inch ductile iron pipe and 8-inch PVC pipe. Sewage flows east to Grant Lorenz Road, then north in the existing sanitary sewer system. 3.2.4 Watermain: Currently, watermain does not serve this project area. Watermain, however, has been constructed on the westerly end of Noble Road and ends approximately 1,100 feet from the project. City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 3 A W$8 4 h>oc_.lnc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS This report addresses the infrastructure improvements necessary to reconstruct Noble Road beginning at Grant Lorenz Road and extending approximately 670 feet west. This section of Noble Road was reconstructed along with sanitary sewer in 1983. 4.1 Street (See Figure 3) Proposed street improvements include the reconstruction of Noble Road beginning at Grant Lorenz Road and extending approximately 670 feet west to match into the inplace curb and gutter section. The proposed street construction will include removal of the existing bituminous pavement, sub cutting the existing subgrade to place 24 inches of select granular material, 8 inches of Class 5 gravel base, and 4 inches of bituminous pavement. The street will be constructed back to its original 24- foot width with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Subgrade improvements include installing geotextile fabric with 24 inches of select granular material placed on top of the fabric. Ifunsuitable organic material is encountered in the subgrade, it will be removed and replaced with granular material. Curb and gutter will extend from Grant Lorenz Road west 670 feet to match into the existing curb and gutter on the project's west end. 4.2 Storm Sewer (See Figure 3) Noble Road is broken into two drainage areas. In the western half, the adjacent properties from the front of the houses drain toward the street and then west to the existing curb and gutter, then into the adjacent ponds. The eastern half, a portion of the front yards drains to the street, then east toward the ditch, running along the western side to Grant Lorenz Road. The inplace storm sewer on the west half of Noble Road is adequate to handle the surface runoff on the west end of the project. The proposed curb and gutter will convey storm water west to the inplace system. The proposed curb and gutter on the east halfwill convey the surface runoffto proposed catch basins located near the Grant Lorenz Road intersection. These catch basins will then drain to an existing ditch on the west side of Grant Lorenz Road. The existing drainage ditch paralleling Grant Lorenz Road is proposed to be cleaned from 100 feet south to approximately 200 feet north of Noble Road. The ditch cleaning will restore the positive drainage from this area. It appears that the ditch is not in an existing right-of-way or easement. Therefore, the need for a drainage and City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 4 .. WSB .I h>oc/atu, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I utility easement will need to be studied when preparing the final construction plans. The existing 36-inch concrete culvert under Noble Road is proposed in the Feasibility Report to be replaced with a new pipe and aprons, which will improve the safety of the intersection. The existing culvert will be reviewed in the final design stage to determine if it can be salvaged and/or left in place with minor pipe extension and new drains. Coordination with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will be necessary for this project. A permit, however, is not anticipated to be required due to the minimal' or negligible impact on increased runoff rates. The project is not increasing the impervious area within the project area and, therefore, a permit is not anticipated. 4.3 Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer improvements will be limited to investigation and evaluation of the existing sanitary sewer for inflow of ground water. The sewer lines will be cleaned during the investigation stage as well. Manholes will be inspected to ensure ground water is not leaking into the system and it is proposed to replace the exiting concrete adjustment rings, install external chimney seals and new manhole castings. 4.4 Watermain (See Figure 4) Water service currently is not available within the project area. Ifthe City desires that watermain should be constructed with this project, a connection to the inplace system located approximately 1,100 feet west of this project would be made. Ifa connection is to be made, two alternative construction methods exist, which are the traditional open cut method or the newer trenchless alternative of direction boring. 4.4.1 Option 1) Traditional Open Cutting: This construction alternative would require approximately one-half of the roadway and curb and gutter to be removed and reconstructed westerly for approximately 1,100 feet west of the proposed Noble Road project in order to install the watermain. This alternative provides the opportunity to install individual house services to the abutting properties. (See Figure 3) 4.4.2 Option 2) Directional Boring: This construction alternative is basically a trenchless technology which can control the direction and depth of the boring head tunneling beneath the surface and once reaching its destination, pull a heavy-walled, plastic, pressure-rated pipe back through the ground. This method would minimize surface disruption in order to make the connection City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 5 ... ~$B .t _lata. Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I to the inplace watermain system west of the project area. This alternative, however, would require the road to be open cut to install Individual water services to the abutting properties. (See Figure 3) 4.5 Sidewalk Sidewalks are not proposed as a part of this project. 4.6 Private Utilities The project area is provided electrical power by Northern States Power (NSP), phone service by US West, gas service by Minnegasco, and cable television by Paragon Cable. It is anticipated that minimal utility relocation work is required on this project. 4.7 Permits I Approvals A permit is not anticipated to be required for this project from the MCWD for the drainage improvements. A preliminary permit application will be submitted to MCWD in order to determine if a formal permit is required for the final design. 4.8 Rights-of-Way I Easements A permanent drainage and utility easement may be required for cleaning the existing ditch along Grant Lorenz Road. This will be further analyzed in the final construction phase. If deemed necessary, an easement will be secured at that time. This feasibility study does not include easement acquisition costs. City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 6 A WS8 .I bNc/atu,lnc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Cost A detailed opinions of cost can be found in Appendix B of this report. The opinions of cost incorporate anticipated 1999 construction costs and include a 10% continency factor and all related indirect costs. The indirect costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. The summary of the project cost is as follows: 5.1.1 Noble Road Improvement . Surface Improvements Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Total $132,700 $3,700 $30,250 $166,650 . . 5.1.2 Optional Watermain Improvements . Option 1) Traditional Open Cutting Option 2) Directional Boring $173,900 $150,300 . 5.2 Funding Funding for the Noble Road reconstruction project will be provided by the local street fund as indicated in the 1999-2003 CIP. City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 7 .A ~S8 '* A.uoc_.Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed project schedule for this improvement is as follows: Order Feasibility Report .................................... March, 1999 Receive Feasibility Report ................................. April 26, 1999 Order Plans and Specifications ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 26, 1999 Approve Plans and Specifications / Order Ad for Bid . . . . . . . . . . .. May 24, 1999 Receive Bids ............................................ June 23, 1999 Award eontract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. June 28, 1999 Begin eonstruction ......................................... July 6, 1999 Substantial eonstruction eompletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. August 31, 1999 Assessment Hearing .................................... September, 1999 Final Lift of Bituminous ...................................... June, 2000 City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 8 ... ~~8 & Anoc_.lnc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION City Project No. 99-01 consists of the reconstruction of streets and appurtenant work as necessary for Noble Road reconstruction beginning at Grant Lorenz Road and extending approximately 670 feet west. It is the recommendation of WSB & Associates, Inc. that City Project No. 99-0 I is feasible, necessary and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. We recommend construction of the proposed improvements as detailed in this report. The inclusion ofwatermain on this project is a decision that City Staff and Council will need to make. Extending the watermain on Noble Road easterly to Grant Lorenz Road would provide the City an opportunity in the future to loop the system by connecting into the existing watermain system located approximately 3,000 feet north on Smithtown Road. As the report indicates, extending watermain to this project area will require work outside of the project limits, and these costs were not included in the original project costs as indicated in the 1999-2003 Shorewood CIP. City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 9 .A WS8 & ARwIatu, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A FIGURES City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street de Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 10 ... W$8 .1_. Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ............----- Lake Minnetonka Upper Lake c o Il1 ::J d RIDGE POIN' GIR. MaT" z.;. ~ Tamarack (((<\,,~ Lake ~ WSB Noble Road Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Project Location Map City of Shorewood, Minnesota WSB PrqectNo. 1151.00 Dale: April 26, 1999 350 \Nestwood Lake OlIice 8441 Wayzala EIouIevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Figure Number 1 1I12.&41...ceoo <I.4n{1daIu,Inc. FAX &41-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PlANNERS 11\ 11.51.00\ feas\fig-Otd9" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... WSB V AI? I E S '" 12' q; NOBLE ROAD I 12' · · SURMOUNTABLE CURB &. GUTTER _=--- -.I 2" WE~R-----===_. 2" BINDER 6" CLASS 5 24" SELECT GRANULAR GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPICAL SECTION \.-=..==== 350 \Nestwood Lake OlIice 8441 Wayzala Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55426 1I12.&41..ceoo 6;AuocIaIU.lnc. FAX &41-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 11\1151.00\ feOl\ fig-02.dgn Noble Road Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Typical Section City of Shorewood, Minnesota WSB Prqect No. 1151.00 Dale: April 26, 1999 Figure Number 2 If I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 950 940 930 920 910 ... WS8 38+00 39+00 3llO WeIlwood ... 0llIce 8441 WIyZIIla BolIevMI MInneIpoIII. MN 55428 8f2.&41-11llD 4.f1todaMr,Jioo. FAX6C1-1'1llO ~ 1NFRA8TRUC1\JAE. ENG1NEER8 . PlANNERS t:\1151.00\fe08\dj.fig-02.dgn ~. ~~ ~ -......~.. .... ~, ' 26450 ~ ,,' 'v '. ". '"-,,,~ ..... '-,', ......... '"", '~.~~~... ". ',. ~ ~ ~.... '. ...~~.~,-- \ \ l .... 0 .~~ "- '" ~< ~ 'T--- "'" - - BEGlN~P -- STA 42+90 ~ I Nob e Road 26420 26390 26360 26330 fT ~ 30'R 18" RCP WI APRON).' &. RIPRAP _____~-~~P\ __ lI"UQi V ~ -p---- t"-- 1-- --~----~ ------- ",... ... ,... \-- *1\ '!JIf ----0 -- ----""""1i' -- o----:!:..-- ---1------ 12" RCP CLEAN EX STING DITCH~ L 1.- 30'R 26505 26435 26405 26365 -~ i6355 /;1 I _~ EXISTING PROFILE - .- --- ----f---- -- -- - --- -- --- --- --- I I : JKh- ""'\ ;-;' / , ~ ~~~t!> ~a '1/ / ,,'8~ (I.. , I, /?f!!jJ ''. 'Y ....j' t ( I . END CONSTRUCTION :t!' 'rl 'Ix STA 49+90 o ) ,"" t b....,S* RCP I . ~ ~ II -- N F- 0 <D N 0 <D N ~ I"l N '" Q1 - I"l N I"l F- - 0 0 <D U1 <T ~ I"l <T '" - N I"l 0 <D ~ ~ ,...; ~ .;, ~ <<, <<, ,;. ,;. N '" ": '" 0 I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l 0 0 0 0 Q1 ,;. <<, '" <<, ~ ~ Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 I"l .... .... .... .... I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l I"l Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 Noble Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Street / Storm. Sewer City of Shorewood, Minnesota I ~ o 50 , '00 950 940 930 920 910 52 51+00 WSB PlojectHo. 1151.00 D8II: AprI:!6, 1. Figure Number 3 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EOOE\WOD ROAD Noble Road WATERMAIN EXTENSION . WS8 3llO WeIlwood ... 0llIce 8441 WIyaIa IIcU8VIld MInneIPOIII. MN 55428 Noble Road - Street, Utilities & Appurtenant Work Sanitary Sewer / Watermain City of Shorewood, Minnesota 81U41-11llD 4.f1todaMr, Jioo. FAXlWM7llO INI'RA81'RUC'1U - EHOItlEER8 - PLANNERS t:\ 1151.o0\feac\fig-04.dgn "... 26450 .....0 26390 ..a ~ (!) WSBPlojectHo. 1151.00 Dale: AprI28, 1. Figure Number 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B OPINION OF COST City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 15 .A ~S8 Ii .4Roc1alcl. Inc. .l3 II:: t; ~ aE ~ ~ \:,) oC:l"" ~ l::S ~~~ oC:l ii; Q I ~ looOi Q ~ ~.s>;: . ~=a~~ II:: :::s ~..... I .~ ~ ~ ~ .s..... ~.~ ~ ~ .s>rt ..'" ~ \J .s> t ~ u ~ g .S l:'c: C)() II::~ ~oC:l ~ - - - ~ ~ ::: ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ..::: ~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 <::> 0 0 0 <::> ~r 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <::> 0 0 on ..... 0 0 0 g 0 VI 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 .::; vi vi r--: <<"-i ~~I ~ 0 0 on 0 I""- """ 0 0 0 \0 00 C'l on 0 C'l on 0 0 ~ I""- C'l 0 :a 0 M rot """ \0 ..... 00 on ..... \0 ..... ..... I""- C'l """ M q """ "'!. C'l 0 \0 vi ~ ..... vi ...0 0 t-:' t-:' N ...0 ...0 ~ 0 vi -.i" ~ ..... ~ <<"-i' 0\ N 0 ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 M ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ ~ II:: .~ .Sl- o ~ ~ ~ .;::: o o o o o vi ~ 8 ::l en Q, 8 ::l ..J c: o ] :i5 o :::E - o o ..... o ~ M ~ - ~ .S ..J C ::l o ~ Q) ::I: Q) ~ Q)" (.) c: Q) ~ - V3 C'l o on C'l o o vi ~ ~ = ;::s ~ Q, Q) o "3 ~ '-' - = e Q) ~ Cl.. rn ::l o = .~ iXi bIl = .~ en M - o o C'l C'l o o r--: ~ "0 >- ::l U c: o .~ ~ ~ '"" Q) 1 .c ::l en """ o o C'l C'l o ~ M ~ "0 >- C' en (.) .;::: ~ ~ ~ 'i( ~ o Q) " on - o on 00 ..... o VI vi ~ "0 >- ::l U ;;- ..J '-' .-.. :o:r C'l '-' ~ o t:: o Q:l 1il "3 ~ " - (.) Q) "0 en \0 o 00 0'\ o o 00 ~ c: ~ C"' 00 '-' VI ~ U Q) gj Q:l Q) 1;; bIl Q) gg <( I""- - on I""- o o o ~ ~ c: ~ <a 05 1;; :::E ..c: (.) 1;; Cl.. rn ::l o 'J iXi 00 o o I""- o ~ M ~ ~ C' en = 8 ~ ~ ~ .2: o B (.) c: o U 0'\ - o C'l C'l o o o M ~ c: ~ .-.. N '-' Q) ~ ~ Q) rn ~ ::l o U bIl c: .~ Q) ~ ..... """ Q) ~ o o C'l C'l o o 00 C'l ~ c: o f-< C"' N '-' Q) ~ o U Q) gj Q:l ..... M Q) Q, ~ o 0'\ o o N ~ 8 1;; o U ~ al f-< ~ ..s ~ ~ Q) 1;; :::E rn ::l o = 's B iXi C'l - o M """ ..... o on r--: ~ ~ = ;::s Q) ~ = ::l o e ::l en ..: Q) ~ " "0 a of ::l U Q) '0 ~ (.) c: o U M ..... o o on ..... o ""! M ~ "0 >- C' en "0 o en """ ..... - o o C'l C'l o o N ~ "0 >- C' tI.l "E ~ ~ Cl.. rn ::l o c: 's B iXi Q) ;> o 8 ~ on ..... o """ o o 00 ~ ~ c: ;::s ~ Q) ~ Q) en e o - en ~ Q) ;> o 8 Q) ~ \0 - I""- o o o on ..... ~ ..c: al '"" rn Q) ~ o Q:l 'a :::E Q) al P.. Q) ~ ;> o 8 ~ I""- """ o o o o ..... ~ ..c: ~ rn 6h V3 Q) al P.. ~ Q) ;> o 8 ~ 00 ..... - o o o o "'!. ..... ~ ~ bIl c: :a Q) Q) en 0'\ s ~ ~ - rn Q) '0 c: ~ .S - c: o U ~ ~ +' "5 ~ ::l en - rn ~ o U '0 ~ :a .s "#. o M 't ~ ~ I "l: ~ ~ ~ ii ~ :3 5 5 ... e ~ ~ s ~~ 11~ ~o- ~~ 1 ~~ l:Ic;~ ~F- ~....<::> ~ .S>~ ..v:;:; I..... ~l:; ~~~ ~ ~'"" ..l:Ic;'t ~ e'~ ~ ... CS' -" :::: ~.. 'C ~~......... 's l:Q ~ .S>~~~ vW;;;..Q;, - - - - I I I I I I Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-01 I I Schedule B - Sanitary Sewer I Televise / Clean Sanitary Sewer LinFt $1.20 875 $1,050.00 2 Casting Assembly Each $350.00 2 $700.00 3 Chimney Seal Each $400.00 2 $800.00 Subtotal $2,550.00 + 1 0% Contingencies $255.00 Subtotal $2,805.00 30% Indirect Costs $841.50 Schedule B - Sanitary Sewer $3,646.50 I I I I I I I I I City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 17 .... ~~8 I cl ARDcIatG./nc. I I I I Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-01 I I fota/Cost Catch Basin (2' x 3') Each $1,200.00 3 $3,600.00 2 4' Diameter Catch Basin / Manhole Each $1,750.00 $1,750.00 3 F&I 12" Storm Sewer Un Ft $22.00 20 $440.00 4 F&I 15" Storm Sewer LinFt $23.00 24 $552.00 5 F&I 18" Storm Sewer Un Ft $24.00 10 $240.00 6 F&I 36" Storm Sewer Un Ft $60.00 45 $2,700.00 7 Casting Assembly Each $350.00 4 $1,400.00 8 18" Apron w/Trash Guard Each $1,500.00 $1,500.00 9 36" Apron w/Trash Guard Each $2,500.00 2 $5,000.00 10 Ditch Excavation / Cleaning CuYd $5.50 500 $2,750.00 11 Random Rip Rap Class III Ton $80.00 15 $1,200.00 Subtotal $21,132.00 + 1 0% Contingencies $2,113.20 Subtotal $23,245.20 30% Indirect Costs $6,973.56 Schedule C - Storm Sewer $30,218.76 I I I I I I I I I I I I City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 18 .... WS8 cl .woe_.lnc. I I I I I I I I I I I Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-01 Schedule A - Street $132,632.50 $3,646.50 $30,218.76 $166,497.76 Schedule B - Sanitary Sewer Schedule C - Storm Sewer I I I I I I I I I City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSBProjectNo.1151.00 Page 19 ~ WSS 4 b>ocIaIeI.lnc. I I Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements City of Shorewood City Project No. 99-01 I Option 1 - Traditional Open Cutting I Item ll~$cliptiQn, Unit Qll#'il?$t Qty ftl{<<lif4t1~ Hydrant Each $1,500.00 4 $6,000.00 2 Connect to Existing Watermain Each $800.00 $800.00 3 6" Gate Valve and Box Each $450.00 4 $1,800.00 4 8" Gate Valve and Box Each $550.00 2 $1,100.00 5 6" DIP Watermain LinFt $18.00 80 $1,440.00 6 8" DIP Watermain Un Ft $22.00 1800 $39,600.00 7 Ductile Iron Fittings Lb $1.50 2000 $3,000.00 8 Remove Curb Un Ft $3.00 1050 $3,150.00 9 Remove Bituminous Pavement Sq Yd $2.00 1400 $2,800.00 10 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) Un Ft $5.00 1350 $6,750.00 II Geotextile Fabric SqYd $3.00 1600 $4,800.00 12 Select Granular Borrow (24") CuYd $5.50 1100 $6,050.00 13 Aggregate Base Class 5 (8") Ton $8.00 650 $5,200.00 14 Bituminous Patch Material Ton $100.00 50 $5,000.00 15 Concrete Driveway Apron Sq Ft $3.00 1000 $3,000.00 16 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") ton $30.00 170 $5,100.00 17 Type 31 Base Course (2") Ton $28.00 170 $4,760.00 18 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $2.00 70 $140.00 19 Concrete Curb and Gutter, Surmountable LinFt $7.50 1050 $7,875.00 20 Sod (w/6" Topsoil) SqYd $3.50 1200 $4,200.00 21 Remove / Replace Mail Boxes Each $150.00 13 $1,950.00 22 Remove / Replace Signs Each $50.00 5 $250.00 23 Salvage & Install Catch Basins Each $4.00 1500 $6,000.00 24 Salvage & Install 12" RCP Un Ft $40.00 20 $800.00 Subtotal $121,565.00 + 1 0% Contingencies $12,156.50 Subtotal $133,721.50 30% Indirect Costs $40,116.45 Total Option No.1 $173,837.95 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of Shorewood · Noble Road Street & Utility Improvements Feasibility Report - City Project No. 99-01 WSB Project No. 1151.00 Page 20 ... WSS 4broclala,lnc. I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c::. 0 0 0 c::. ~r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c::. ~ ~ M "'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ - - loCi ~ "'~II 0 0 0 0 C'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "<t 0 lI'I ..... - C'l 00 c::. 0 00 0'\ - r- "<t 0 lI'I., 100 ~ 0'\ - O. 0 ~ ..... lI'I 100 100 "'l .0 ~ ~ - ~ .,.; .0 - ~ - ~ - - r-: - ~ 0 .,.; ..; cS ~ ~ - 100 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c::. - - M 'I'l ~ ~ ;:; ~ - ~ ;:; ~ s CIJ ] CIJ f'l 01) Vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S '() B 0 .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 s:: U "<t C'l C'l 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 oCl ~ .0 "<t - 0 r- ;:l r- - - M C'l M C'l - M ~ 00 tS ::: ,S e .2 .... ~ s:: :a 0 s:: U - - ~ 0 ~ ~ S ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 1;; 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - a ~ 0 0 0 0 00 ('oj 0 II') 0 0 0 lI'I 0 0 lI'I + lI'I., 0 lI'I lI'I - C'l 100 - ('oj .,.; ....; .,.; 00 0 M 00 "<t lI'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -Cl ~ ""'t ~E"l::s~ ~~~d.. (,0 ~~ .... ;: . .... .... ~ "0 ~ "0 "0 ~:a~~ .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: "0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .0 >- >- >- s:: s:: >- 1I:::::5~.... s:: s:: s:: ....l s:: 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;J ;J ;J 0" ;J 0" ;:l E-< 0" .f':l .S; ~ tIj ~ 00 00 u 00 ~ .s.... ~.~ ~ ~ ~ .5-( ~ ~'" tIj u .5- ,...., ~ ~"l::s U t ~ ~ Q ~ 01) .S ~ Cl :.::: O(l '3 :;5 II::~ ~-Cl "0 ~ ~~ s:: e 15 '-' ~ 't;J 0 15 c-- "tel. E co 01) e 01) ~ ,...., ~~ ~ 01) -a 01) ~ C'l e -a ~~ .S 1;j s:: ~ '-' oc ... ~ ~ ~ 0 Q. ~ ~ lI'I ~ ~ 0 0 "-e Q. 0 CIJ l::Itl l:l:l bI) co co CIJ CIJ CIJ I:: ~ ;:;s <::l 'll e bI) ;:l I:l::~ 03 "0 "0 s:: s:: s:: 0 ;:l 0 0 1; !a !a 't;J 't;J 0 ':8 s:: 0 ,~ co .J:: ~~ CIJ s:: <.) E E 's ... 1;1 01) 1;j oCl c::. II:: '>< 01) 01) = ii: 's ~ ~ .S; ~ > > 01) 01) .a '3 Q. ~ ,5'~ -a -a 1;j 1;j 't;J s:: .a ~ !a co CIJ 'tl B >- >- ~ ~ E .g iE iE ,g 01) ;:l ,0:;:: ~ .... ... 1;j 0 I..... ~ <.) ~ 01) 01) 01) bI) >< c s:: 'l::I ..... .... 01) 1;j Q. Q. 1;j ~ > bI) 's gSc:l s:: .... 01) ~ ... s:: a a ~ .~ 0 01) <.) "0 s:: C c:> e '~ "0 01) 50 .a "0 ~ ~~ I ;0., 0 ;:l ~ 01) '0 ~ 0 <<"'l :I: U \0 00 \0 00 00 Cl 00 c:> 00 iE 00 10;; I:l:: tl II:: ~ ,5'~ .~ ~ ~::::~..... C'l M "<t 0 - C'l M "<t lI'I ~oCl f'l ~ lI'I \0 r- oo 0'\ 'ij ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - .5' 'll ~ ":l ow;; l:l.;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85 E. SEVENTH PLACE SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MN 55101-2887 651-223-3000 FAX: 651-223-3002 ilqll[;.c.lG IE /l \\j7I~..~[ ::niAPR 2 0 1999 ;/ ; i11 b I . ; L.;.) : Isv i .1~ I f SPRINGSTED Public Finana Advisors April 19, 1999 ~ Mr. Alan Rolek Financial DirectorlTreasurer City of Shorewood 5755 Country Ciub Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . Dear Mr. Rolek: Thank you for meeting with Nick and me last week to discuss the creation of a Tax Increment District in your community. We have estimated the amount of time involved in this process at 40 hours. The fee will not exceed $5,000.00 plus travel expenses, if any, that may be incurred. Also enclosed, please find the requested time line. . Please call me at (651) 223-3016 if you should have any questions. We look forward to working with you and the City. . ij:IY' John A. Sander, Vice President Client Representative jam.Shorewo7.1la cc: Nick Skarich, Springsted Incorporated ~8 SAINT PAUL, MN . MlNNEAPOUS, MN' BROOKl=lElD, WI . OVERlAND PARK, KS . WASHINGTON, DC . DES MOINES, IA APR 02 '99 08:16AM AP TELCOM MPLS P,l/2 .-- -' APT i\ ;\1 E \{ I C r\ ~ l' 0 1~ T A ~ I. E TEL F COM " TDS COMPANY 6000 WQSt 78th Street, Suite 400 Minneapoli$, MN 55439 612-833-4000 Fax 612.833-4110 April 1, 1999 Mr, Brad N1elsen Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: letter of Intent for Communications Facility Installation . Dear Mr. NIelsen: Introductioo American Portable Telecom (" APT") is interested in installing a conununicati01'lS facility on the West End Water Tower located at Miniwashta School on SmithtoWn Road. . Backp~d, API'is a subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, Ine, ("TDS"), ros is a GUcago- based teleccnununkations company, which provides cellular telephone and local telephone services to more than 2,3 million customers in 37 states and the District of Columbia through its subsidiaries, including United States Cellular Corporation and TDS T e1.ecOII1II1.U1'lications Cmporation. APT provides personal communication service ("PCS") technology for TDS under the trade name 11 Aerial Communications, Inc." In 1996, APT was granted a license by the Federal Conununications Commission to operate a PCS wireless telephone system in the Twin Cities market area. A copy of our license is enclosed for your files. PCS is one of the newest of the emerging low-power wireless technologies. APT~I We propose to lease space for the installation of twelve (12) PCS panel antennas on the handrai110cated at the top of the West End Water Tower, Our initial irtstallation would include only six (6) antennas, but we anticipate the need for the additional an~ as capacity issues ~ with customer growth. We propose to install our coz:nmunications equipment within the base of the water tower in radio frequency secure, metal enclosures. Antennas and. commurlications equipme1'lt would be connected by use of approved transmission lines (called" coaxial cable" by the industry) fastened along the ladder chase inSide the water toWer, Our installation would meet all of the technical requirements imposed by the Oty, {/ IIq t jI'", / .' ':":.{ ""-:-l; <-J ~ j)"C../f;tr. ..(/ / V' .- :. -1._.1'" t , I' ~'- -~"-~ " ,;" ~- --"1' ., , APR 02 '99 08:16AM AP TELCOM MPLS ... P.2/2 Brad Nielsen April!, 1999 Page Two J:n developing this proposal, API' has carefully considered alternative structures in the area, including the T onka Bay water tower and the se1f--supporting communications tower next to the water tower. These altemam-es are situated. too far from the area requiring coverage, and no other structures exist within the vicinity of the West End Water Tower. As APT cannot feasibly co-locate on an existing .f.ree..standing tower or building structure and meet its coverage demands, the West End Water Tower becomes the logical altemative. This water tower not only provides the best radio frequency coverage in the area, but it is a familiar installation for APT. As API has irlstaUed communications facilities on 64 . water towers within its network to date, with 2 additional water tower installations underway. AN is accustomed to the requirements and concerns raised by this type of installation and can meet them without jeopardizing the Oty's primary objective of providing cl~ safe drinking water to the residents of Sho:rewood. General Consideration APT's service usage continues to grow a sirong customer base within the City of Shorewood. Coverage issues effect both our ability to increase marketshare and also the customer's ability to use APT's service with ~asonable e.xpectation for clarity. Customer' complaints of "dropped calls" reflect a difficulty in having the necessary antenna locations. Correcting these problems will have a direct benefit on the City's residents who are served by APT's system. Consent Requested APT requests the consent of the City of Shorewood to the use of the West End Water Tower to install a PCS communications facility. APT fully appreciates that the aty would be compensated for the proposed use by entering into a written lease agreement. APT looks forward to working with the Oty. If you have any questions or concerns to discuss with me, please call me at 612-833-4078. Thank you for your consideration. . Sincerely, Steven P. Katkov Real Estate and Zoning Manager . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612)474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 0 www.state.netlshorewood ocityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator . FROM: Lany Brown, Director of Public Works Jfr DATE: April 22, 1999 RE: Consideration of A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Feasibility Report and Setting a Date for a Public Infonnation Meeting Included in the City Council Packet is the feasibility report for reconstruction of Noble Road from Grant Lorenz Road to approximately 670 feet west. .~ This portion of Noble Road was constructed in 1983. Subgrade materials are very susceptible to frost heave. As such, this portion of the roadway has deteriorated to a point of what is known as alligator cracking. The remaining roadway surface consists of small blocks ranging in size of 4 to 6 inches square. Typically, any action to maintain, such as sweeping of these areas will dislodge various blocks~ The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) indicates that this road is to be reconstructed this year. The initial amount budgeted for in theCIP $174,200. The estimated project cost in the feasibility report is $166,650 (includes contingency, design and construction). The existing street section is a 24-foot wide roadway with bituminous curb. The proposed section will match the existing width, along with curb and gutter to match the remainder of Noble Road. - This item will be presented in greater detail at Mondaynight's City Council meeting. Staff is suggesting that an Open House Public Infonnation Meeting.be held on May 12th from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30_p.m. _Staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution which accepts the feasibility . report and sets a date for the Open House. o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 10. ! ' \ J ); (: C/.l o d ::to g ~ ~ e: C/.l ~. ct S ~ r:::r CD ~ a So' ~ ~ 8- ~ C/.l ~ 5' S" (') o ~. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF THE JUNE 30,1999 DUE DATE FOR REVIEW OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH AMENDED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POLICY PLANS . WHEREAS, state statutes (Minn. Stat. ~473.175-473.871 (1996)) requires that cities review and revise their comprehensive plans for consistency, with Metropolitan Council policy plans; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has amended its policy plans; and has provided system statements outlining Council policy relative to the city; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is required to review its comprehensive plan for consistency with the amended policy plans and to prepare a revised comprehensive plan for submission to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1999 as reqeusted by Resolution 98-113; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has scheduled and budgeted to complete a major review and update of its comprehensive plan by September 30, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Shorewood requests that the Metropolitan Council grant the City of Shorewood an extension to the deadline to complete its comprehensive plan; circulate the revised document to the adjacent governmental units and affected school districts for review and comment; and, following approval by the Planning Commission and after consideration by the City Council, submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review by September 30, 1999. . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 26th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR iF II L ir'lr* · ~. CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING AN ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section the following: of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is amended to include Subd. 1 Establishment: The Environment and Land Conservation Committee is hereby established. The Environment and Land Conservation Committee is referred to herein as "the Committee." . Subd.2 The goals of the Committee shall be to: a. Carry out a process that will permanently protect, and lead to an increase in the amount of protected natural open space in Shorewood; b. Serve as an advisory committee to the City Council, the Planning Commission and Park Commission on matters relating to the City's environmental resources; c. Serve as an education resource to the City Council and Commissions, and property owners regarding land protection options, about the benefits of an on-going land conservation effort and an environmental issues; and d. Serve as a liaison between the City, its residents and other environmental agencies and groups in land conservation and environmental issues. . Subd.3 The Committee shall have duties in the following areas: a. Land Conservation: Make recommendations to the City Council and work with City staff in carrying out the conservation open space planning process and implementation of the plan as recommended in the Land Conservation Committee report of December, 1998. Conservation open space is defined as follows: Land that is largely free of man-made structures, where ground cover is such that rain may enter the soil to replenish ground water, where use of the land promotes air and water quality, scenic beauty, wildlife habitat and/or natural communities. ~IL Ordinance No. .J · ~., Implementation includes citizen education efforts and promotion of the use of the various land conservation tools. The Committee will advise the City Council on acquisition of conservation open space and management of passive open space lands. The Committee will develop a stewardship plan for each open space parcel acquired by the City. Management includes any minimal development (i.e. trails, restoring natural communities, and controlling disease and invasive species on City-owned open space). b. Environmental Guidance: Upon referralpy the City Council, Park Commission or Planning Commission, make policy recommendations on issues, proposed construction, subdivision, or Public Works projects that may affect the City's open space or sensitive areas. Offer advice on the management of natural area lands, including passive recreation areas of parks. Act as a resource to the City Council in responding to natural resource questions, environmental review and environmental assessment worksheets. . Advise the City Council and act as a resource for residents on ways to control or co-exist with native animals and birds. c. Coordinate Environmental Education: Act as a resource for the City of Shorewood and Shorewood citizens on environmental issues such as: (1) Restoration of natural communities; (2) Stormwater runoff; (3) Water quality oflakes, streams and wetlands; . (4) Control of lawn fertilizers, and pesticides; (5) Tree disease such as oak wilt; (6) Control of buckthorn and exotic species; (7) Increase in the coverage of natural plants, prairie gardens; (8) Landscaping with native species; (9) Saving energy; (to) Pest control; (11) Tree preservation; (12) Waste reduction, recycling, composting, and litter; and (13) Maintain an environmental library and be a resource for environmental science education for young people and adults. 'r~r --'- '\ \. Ordinance No. Subd.4 Subd.5 . Subd.6 Subd.7 . Subd.8 Subd.9 Subd.l0 d. Liaison: Maintain a City liaison with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation Commission (LMCC), Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), the Riley-Purgatory Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Minnesota Extension Service. Membership of the Committee: Membership shall consist of five (5) residents of the city appointed by the City Council; a representative of the Planning Commission, appointed by the Planning Commission; a representative of the Park Commission, appointed by the Park Commission. In making appointments, the City Council shall consider geographic disbursement and environm~ntal topic expertise. Terms: Terms of appointment commence on February 1 and terminate on January 31 or until vacancy is filled. The initial resident appointments shall be made as follows: one (1) to serve until January 31, 2000; two (2) to serve until January 31, 2001; and two (2) to serve until January 31, 2002. Park and Planning Commission appointees shall be made annually in January or as soon thereafter as possible by the Commissions. Removals: The City Council shall have the power to remove any member of the Committee for cause as defined in the Shorewood Personnel Policy and after a public hearing with two (2) weeks published notice, by two-thirds of the entire City Council. Organization: At the first regular meeting of the year, the Committee shall appoint a chairperson from among its voting members. This appointment shall be subject to Council approval and shall consist of a one (1) year term. The position of Chair shall rotate among members, with no Committee member serving in that capacity for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The Committee shall also elect a vice-chair from among its appointed members for a term of one (1) year. The Committee may create and fill such other offices from its members as it may determine needed to transact Committee business. Regular Meetings: The Committee shall meet as needed, but not less than once each quarter at a time which the Committee shall fix by resolution. Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson or by any two (2) members of the Committee by a written notice filed with the Administrator who then shall notify all members of the Committee of the time and date of the special meeting, at least three (3) days before the meeting date. Quorum: A majority of the appointed Committee members shall constitute a quorum. Ordinance No. Subd.ll Subd. 12 Subd. 13 ., ...... '"'r Bylaws, Records: The Committee shall adopt bylaws for its governance and for the transaction of its business. The bylaws will be reviewed on an annual basis at the first regular meeting in February. · A recording secretary shall keep a record of attendance ,at Committee meetings, a record of resolutions, and votes and abstentions on each question requiring a vote. The record of the Committee shall be a public record. Work Plan: In June of each year. the Committee will submit a report on the current calendar year activities and a recommended work plan for the next 18 months to the City Council for review and direction. In conjunction with that submittal, a budget request will be submitted to the City Administrator for the next fiscal year. Sunset: The Committee shall cease to exist on June 30, 2002 unless, upon review during the previous six month period. the City Council extends its life for an additional three years by resolution. A review and resolution extending the Committee shall occur at the end of each three year period or the Committee shall cease to exist. . Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and enter its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this day of ATTEST: WOODY LOVE, MAYOR . JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR t -.. LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE GOALS & OBJECTIVES First Draft. For Council Discussion 4/12/99 The Land Conservation Committee goal is to carry out a process that will permanently protect, and lead to an increase in the amount of protected natural open space in Shorewood. Objectives Education: Educate the City Council and Commissions and City property owners about land protection options and about the benefits of an on-going land conservation effort. Vision: . Coordinate a process to develop a community vision for open space which is consistent with community values, and to develop criteria for prioritizing parcels to be acquired. The process needs to involve all elements of the community. Plannine & Implementation: Carry out a process to protect open space in perpetuity by: A. Working with the Planning Commission and Park Commission to develop an open space plan which prioritizes sites for acquisition, and identifies funding sources, staff responsibilities, and long term land management for an acquisition program. B. Working with existing land conservation organizations whenever possible. . C. Incorporating citizens from throughout the City and natural resource professionals in the planning and implementation process. 1. Citizens should have meaningful input: . When the community develops a vision of open space in Shorewood. . When criteria for selecting and ranking open space parcels is developed and when open space parcels are prioritized. . In budgeting for acquisition of development rights or purchase of property. 2. If a number of citizens are interested in participating, a simple volunteer information sheet should be developed to find out what people like to do and what skills they have to offer. 3. Involve people of various ages, ethnicities, and abilities to participate. People with a broad range of interests and from all precincts should be encouraged to actively participate in the process D. Recommending revisions to goals and objectives to achieve open space preservation. E. Implementing a land registry program and maintaining signage to ensure identification as a program participant. F. Developing specific guidelines for all City open space, set-aside program elements. G. Making recommendations on the acquisition of tax forfeit property for open space purposes. H. Developing a positive working relationship with land owners who are considering selling their land to make sure they are aware of the benefits of setting aside land. They should be advised to consult tax specialists. AssessmentJEvaluation: A. Assess community support for open space acquisition. B. Report to the City Council each June on progress toward the goals and objectives and on a work plan for the next eighteen months. Financial Resources: Upon direction from the City Council, coordinate efforts to acquire financial resources: A. Research and complete applications for government, non-profit or private land conservation grant programs. B. Coordinate all aspects of a referendum effort for an authorization for the City to undertake a public bond issuance for land acquisition purposes. If a referendum is required an educational campaign would be necessary to make voters aware of the issues. Voters should have a clear understanding that their taxes might go up and that not every open space parcel in every neighborhood will be purchased. C. Utilize estate planning, land exchanges, and public education to encourage donations. NOTE: Numerical objectives such as a number of sites or acres to be protected over the next three years should be considered. Data/LandConservationlObjectives .' , " . . Lots With Development Potential . . Land Conservation Action Plan . . Land Conservation Action Plan ",,~ i":E,,::;, · ".' ,. " ' ," , '" '>:;':;<:':;;":';:"':4;it.;~.~&I!~:; , I :;flc;;;.(JUlml~!Jjm al~l:fis .1,~lmlllt1IU~IlI.wr;'\;'>;";:;~v '.:'. ::~:~::"::::::. .::: '. : ....:.... ~a lltl~. '.. t:l~ 1~~m~~~..lI;m: :'. llil~.Im;I....:.::. .:..:..:::.:::-.:...:.::;::...:::.:.:....,.:::.":.:::::::,. ; r:;0;~~;~f~ ,'"," ", ;", ,.' ,> ',' :'.~:t~,;::il.:~;~;,.::~;.;;;~;/~~.~I~~~h~\.&::" m , ,"", "m~mmll\Jil];;~~;; );!!J~tI.jjsml:iJ; t'YdS1m\Jilb" ""'liwrii" ....., .. . '.' ....... CJ;nJ1 Ii' m~ ~ ~ .m a;m.... .. .... '. ........:~:(:::j:::::;?:::j:t.:::::::::: .......... . .... ""t.."........'.....,.... " ):J 1:':t1;)/0 ':""""" ;; '{; , , ,'. /; ,,; .;/.p~.1~lf';;;~;;;i~ "by " ... -. .. " ............ ',. .. ".... . . .... 4 ... ........ ... 110. Key Recommendations ::;,; . . Key Recommendations . . Key Recommendations ::;,; . . Key Recommendations . . Key Issues To Be Considered . . Key Issues To Be Considered . . Key Issues To Be Considered . . Key Issues To Be Considered . . To: Mayor and City Council ~ From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: April 21, 1999 Re: City Hall Hours of Operation . Attached you will see area City Hall hours as listed by the League of Minnesota Cities. You will note that Shorewood is an anomaly by opening at 8:30 and closing at 5:00 p.m. All other cities are 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (except for Minnetonka Beach which is 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.). City staff has indicated that there seems to be a greater interest in residents coming to City Hall from 8:00 to 8:30 in the morning than from 4:30 to 5:00 in the afternoon. It is City Hall staff's preference to change City Hall office open hours to 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. as is the case in all other neighboring City Halls. . It is important for everyone to understand that flexibility in hours is important for a small City Hall. Except for unusual circumstances, we will have someone available for public consultation in each department during all open hours. However, it would be advisable to call and make appointments if possible otherwise department personnel may be tied up at other scheduled meetings. We want to offer as much flexibility to employees as possible in their working hours while still maintaining excellent accessibility to the general public. We would suggest that the change take place immediately following Memorial Day so it could appropriately be advertised. If the Council concurs, the action would be a motion authorizing the change. fPl3 CITY HALL HOURS Chanhassen Dee haven Excelsior Greenwood Lon Lake Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Orono Shorewood S rin Park Tonka Ba Victoria Wa zata Woodland 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m.- 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 .m. 8 a.m. - Noon & 1 .m. - 4 8 a.m. - 4:30 .m. 8 a.m. - 4:30 .m. 8 a.m. - 4:30 .m. 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 .m. 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 8 a.m. - 4:30 . . CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 26,1999 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE APRIL 14, 1999 . CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED 25040 PERA 25041 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 25042 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 25043 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 25044 CONNIE BASTYR 25045 BROWNING FERRIS IND. 25046 CRAGUN'S CONF. CENTER 25047 FRIENDS OF S. SHORE SR CTR 25048 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CTR 25049 MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR 25050 THERESA NAAB 25051 JOSEPH PAZANDAK 25052 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 25053 LAWRENCE NICCUM 25054 MIDWEST COCA-COLA 25055 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. 25056 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 25057 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS 25058 ARMOR LOCK & ALARM 25059 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT 25060 NORTHERN STATES POWER 25061 US WEST 25062 BELLBOY CORP. 25063 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 25064 CENTRAL DATA SUPPLY 25065 DAY DISTRIBUTING 25066 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. 25067 HONEYWELL PROTECTION 25068 JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR 25069 LAKE REGION VENDING 25070 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 25071 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 25072 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS 25073 THE WINE COMPANY 25074 WINE MERCHANTS . PURPOSE PERA DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS UNION DUES CITY HALL PLANTS TB L1Q RECYCLING MCMA CONF. LODGING-HURM REISSUE-TRAIL MTG ROOM RENTAL MCMA CONF. REGISTRATION-HURM CHILD SUPPORT-C. SCHMID MILEAGE/COMPUTER PARTS MILEAGE MISC PURCHASE CELL PHONE SUPPLIES MISC PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE FREIGHT L1QUOR/WINE PURCHASE EQUIP. MAINTENANCE MARCH SAC UTILITIES UTILITIES LIQUOR/BEER PURCHASE MISC/SUPPL Y PURCHASE SUPPLIES BEER/MISC PURCHASE L1QUOR/WINE/MISC PURCHASE SEMI ANNUAL MONITORING L1QUOR/WINE PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE L1QUOR/WINE PURCHASE L1QUOR/WINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED Page 1 AMOUNT $2,988.35 1 ,130.40 1,080.80 170.45 52.60 92.95 193.90 25.00 185.00 181.50 56.95 43.40 109.72 31.94 914.00 20,168.35 242.75 1,378.38 189.67 1,039.50 7,546.69 207.19 8,252.28 1,160.37 408.70 8,694.64 18,102.43 214.50 13,543.07 2,811.63 . 581.80 9,525.09 1,905.90 644.76 317.15 $104,191.81 Cl o r: W Q:: o I (f) J... o >- t!S Q::' O:E J... -' ;-. >-i (f)U >-iZ -'::> o -'U <I: :>0"- o v' n::(J\ CLrl CL '3: . .!) Y': N U W ' In:: !j Q.. <,J: >-i U I ! I Zl ::>1 01 .~ 1 <J:I I I I I , I I CLI WI 01 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ZI 01 >-il 1 Q..! >-il Q::I UI (f)l WI 01 I ! 1 I I 1 ! I I I ! I I I WI >1 <<I Zl I Ct:1 01 01 ZI WI :> I ,.... ..... Y': U W I U ;/) N N ro N o'::>n'-)o.-, C> C> ::> ~:) C> ~5 - I :I I I I 'I 000000 o -0 .!) .!) ,0 .!) N;/);/);/);/);/) . ~ n:: <3: t!S >- C> C> WW 0 WOO U n:: n:: n:: ,~, Zn::n::OOO <J:WW::>::>::> Z;.-3:0'00 >-i <I: W >-i >-i >-i lL3:(f)-'-,-, ;.- "'i U Z >-i <J: :E o o ;n ~- :- :- :- :- ~ t3: >-i >-i >-i >-i '-4 >-i 000000n:: ::>::>::>::>::>:)0 <J: <J: <J: <I: ':I: '3: J... -' c:): " ~ >-i ::l 0' W ;;.- -' CL Q.. ::> (f) ~ :L U >-i W o Z ':I: Z W :E Q.. >-i ::> a UJ o o ;n <I: ;c [Q o o ;n <J: CJ. ;/) .!) :"- ;..... o 0 ;/) if) N N C> o :.:: U >-i W o Z ':I: o o [Q ([ D * ,~ v i~ :....- rl ::) -0 (.:5 Cl -' [Q Z ::> :E -' D '.... ,.... Z o u (f) W Q. U Z >-i -' o (l: Z o U (f) W CL '.f) ;E CJ.. o ':1: :'..... :...... o ;/) N 0'\ ;..... ~. (!5 Z '-i Z .,. :3: -' Q.. t!S 2" "'j Z >-i (l: CL .~. D :.n z >-i (D -' C,J_ ro ;...... o ~") N c) <-1 cr" ~<) 0"" ~.. Nrlro.o !. ! ! r ('-4 ,0 ,I) ...-{ (XJ ~ 1') ...-{ (,--l N if) W Cl ,-1 ,11 0:: (f) t!S ...t Cl 1l.J Z ;2: l11 '-4 '-4 Q: Z z: UJ ...\ :.... .,. 3: :!5 0 ~:r. t11 2: n:: -' (.0 l11 Q.. Q.. C( uJ <I: 3: et: >-i ':I: a.. W n:: -' -' uJ 3: (~ LLl (.:5 Cl <l: (D u.JL!.JWW~ ;C;EL;E~ >-i '-4 '-4 '-i <J: . . . . -~--_.. . . . . C(C((l:n::n:: >-i >-i '-4 >-i 0 ':J: <): <:I: ':I: J... o u (f) L tU ~0 '- .' (.0 U >-i .'1' -". :E o 0<$ ::l <J: C,J_ V' c) ;~, ro C> ,-. --' ;II ,n ('.4 N . ,f) 0--. r...._ -' ':I: o * ;~ * a-. o , ~ N ('-4 ...t ~ 'v ro . . ",. N ~ ~- N ;~, 0:: <J: us o a... a-. ~r) ~ >- u.J (f) W:L n::n:: <:I: (f)Q.. >-i U to W H _J Q. CL ::l ~f) U .,. 00::; W LU t11 LU ~ (f)(f):L n:: (f) (f) " ~0 (f) <I: '3: n:: n::n::O t!St!SlL -' '3: L D U Ct: ':J: W [Q u z: >-i Y': Ct: " rl ro o ,.() ('-4 ('4 ro () if) N if) ~ o * * * O. 1f) :.... r...... ...-{ (f) W uJ et: :-. (f) (f) o <I: o (~ I n:: >-i r:l :':: U <J: -' [Q o U Z W ill 0:: (!5 W -' <J: o ?0 ro () ;I") N ;{j ::> o > ..:') o 0:) N .-{ rl o 1<) o ,..... o N rl 1<) Z o U ._J '-4 U U W Z " ::l 0 o n:: c.> Q.. J... <J: n:: (f) W .-4 >-i :> to :L <J: o >-i W n:: U <J: <J: 3: ;.- >- J... -' 0 ::l (f) " ........ to J... D. o 0 <I: -' <J: Z t!S >-i (f) :t a.. <J: ~. -' J... o >- :E :E o to U Z o J... "'i o ::> n:: -' W 0 ;n (f) :E '3: I >-i U -' n:: <J: o >-i >-i (f) a.. .J <'l: W U U >< ill ill (!5 >-i U I 0:: o >-1 (f) -' W U >< W ~ ;/) ro ro C> C> ;I) ;I) "."4 (f) .0 ro o ;/) N :---.. (0 C> 1f) ?0 0 . . . ~~. 0 . 0" u.l u.J W 000 Ct: 0:: n:: ~WH:! :- 3: ,:1. '3: W W 3:(f)(f) WW -' uu <J: >-i>-i U :).. > i n::n:: W WW(f)Z (f) (f) ,11 0 W -'-'OW -'-'Z;.- <J: <J: W <I: UU;.-;.- ;.- (f) W W <I: ZZ rr. OO?0W II n::n::rr.CL <J: .:}: <J: 0 :E!:Z:!5 I I >-i UU!:n:: ulWWO OO(f)J... Z -' >-i <J: o -' -' 'J: * U * I * W z: o ,.IJ <J: ~0 ~ W "T' -'- q (5 (!5 ro o ;/) N ;/) ~.. . ro v' ro (j' 00 0\ rl rl n:: <I: (!5 >- >-1 U Z >-i <I: :E n. >-i ::l 0' W o U (f) W -' <J: (f) I U <J: I ;r: >-i " ro (XJ C> ;I) N N 1f) 1<) 1f) N NS to :L et: <J: a. Ct: u.J Z z: 'J: -' Q.. ~ n:: <I: CL Ct: <J: !: " :5 o n:: (!5 Ct: u.J -' t!S W o :L ., Z o t!S Z >-i (f) >-i o I 0' ro o ;/) ('-'{ ro (0 ,f) 1l) r,,'" d' ~s ). >-i U to u.J >-i -....1 Q.. CL ::> (f) >- 7' :3: Q.. :E o U (f) n:: <J: a. (f) .!.. "'i :I': CL o :r: o a, o ;I) N ,.'") V' ;/) 1l) rl rr. .:}: t!S ). >-i U (f) W >-i -' Q.. CL ::l (f) ~0 U :) o o 0:: Q.. r;' << :L rl a, ,.) :0 N .!) ;/) w r..... Q: ':1' d >- '-4 U n:: '.1 ,:}: a.. W n:: '",' o [0 -' >-i '::I: ~t.. o U Ct: W ;n L ::l ._1 >< o z y.: N :.i' o '-'I N ~ ", t .. ~ (() 'i) ?F) ....1 t..,~ ~~:t __I .--j U ;2: ::J D U '" ~~I ~ ) .t.. >. :.L >.. "":- tll _I Cl U :E -' z: >-\ <:I: N QI III p.. rr. a D. .-j ::> (3 u.J o z (,~ u ...j (~ .!.. ;U :E n (r) '-4 o ~-~ -, ...... Q UJ ::::~ n:: ill 3: (:) (1. Ct: w ~0 7- 5 U lJJ y.: (,J.. __.1 ':J: Y':: :L .L ~"t:: C~ -' ._1 ;") ;J'... (> ~0 (-'4 ~. 0-'" C> if) r....~ o o o 3: u.J eX: o I (f) (!5 0:;- O:E u_ ...1 ;- >-i to U '-4 Z _J ::> o -'u <3: > v' 00'- Ct: v' Cl..rl Q.. <J: . ,0 Y': N U W 1 IO: UQ.. <J: ;1. o >- '-4 U Z ::> o :E <J: Q.. W o Z o >-i Cl.. H tY. U (f) u.J o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WI ,~ I <3: I Zl I 0:1 01 OJ Zl WI .::. I I :;r.l :'::1 UI WI II Ul I ~. 1<) ;Ii ;f) ,n 1f) ro >-iJ) 'J: L w W tY. -j ::> 0' W n: w 3: (f)0 -'Q... o o uJ ;-:L I <l: ;..' -' Z >-iUS <3' 7 ;Eo -' W WtY. tY.0 ;- ;.1. 1f) 1f) ...1 ':I: o ;~ * * rl rl .-1 :' rl ~ (f) :L 0: ~x Cl.. (f) u.J ..j -' Q.. Q.. ::> (f) :L n:: .J: Q.. u Z >-i (f) ill 'J: >-i U o (f) (f) <J: <r. ", :L ;,() a'" o if) N ;II o a-- 1<) G:: <1: (!5 '... " >-i U Z >-i .J: :E O. '-4 ::> (3 W ;;.- z <3: Q... :E o U :!l Z >-i ::> [Q >-i n: (f) >-i o >-i :L .!) a-- ::> ;f) N o ~. O'rr) ,0 ~. (!5 z ..., (f) l11 (!5 ::> Ct: o '.[) W >-i ~ o <1: u:: o (D <3: -' x o o W .~ :'.. 0" ::> 1) [...J . !J'... "". " N :'.. ,'4 ;11 o n: u.J 3: U.l (f) (f) u.1 (!5 cr <l: I U Z Ul :L <3: t11 n: >- <J: :E .!... W :E z o 0: '-j ).. 2: ;.l.1 -' >-i U Z ::> o U o Ct: W L- ()J a, o ;.<) r"l ::> :..... r',~ a N :> o :!s .'- u.1 (!S tf) W >-i _1 0, O. ::l (f) W U '-4 LL J... o o Cl.. W D W U >-i Lt. u_ o 0" 0' o J) N ;.!I ;-"{ 1() ("4 (',I o n: o~ w ct >-4 l1. ;2: o '-j u W o n: Q... U1 n:: '-4 LL n: a Cl z N LL o ,,- >-i U I o Z ::l o :E a o rl ,I') (,'.\ ...1 o <-1 ;I) N . ~.. C) c) 00 ::) c) . . V' :::> ::> 'D 1() ;~. ~{ to") C> 'to I'!" ~-> (~ ~. ('''~ ~:) '-4 o a wwa, (!l 00 ~ 0 ,0 .J Ct: n: co ;1.1 w ~-.. 3: Z ':1: u.J ::> 3: L0 ~t.. :i'j 3: D ~!... to o Z ':1: to u ;2: :- ;.-0( zz !-1 ~-~ r- ~~; 'J' T .t. :t: U w n:u::;- ;1.1 W >-i '- 3' .,. ;J: w:5 3: (f) !: >- >- n: '3: <1: 0 :C:C LL U Z '-4 (f) z o (f) 0<$ u Z H 0: LU -' -' w ::> :L T. U ;.l.1 '-4 L 3: .!... ::> ;E ~...{ ..-" '-' <-1 if) r...{ -' ':I: o ;~ * * J) 1<') 0". ;I) (X) J) 1 . 0'''1 1') ,-1 >() 0"' 'D ;I) ;.<) tY.tY.rl <J: '3: (!5(!5 >->- >-I >-i UU 2: z e..t: Z w >-i T. <J:(f);.- !:W{~ >-i0 Q.. _J Z >-iCl.. ::>n.n: 0' ::l 0 W (f) lL -' o <3: u '-i ':I: !: (!5 Cl ...1 OJ T. U uJ :) -' ':1: :;}.. Q.. >-i ::> * 0' * W ;~ w ::> n: ~ -' o o l11 0::: Ct: <J: Z u:: W I >.. 0::: o ",,' ,,- 'J: Z 1<) C> rl ;.,/ ,'.i ,,~ C> <-1 ;f) N ~ ~ 1 >-i ::> CJ W ~ -' D o o 1f) ('1.) ~rl . 1 ,0 ,0 ,0 00 "4 1') (!5 o -' [Q z ~ :L (f) u.J o u:: w Z 0: o U w 'v ..... ::l >-i Z 0: ::> LL Lll U >-i J... LL o ;f) o <-1 ;Ii N rl (f) ",,' .<.- >-i o n:: n. -' o n: z o U -' <J: 1: >-i Z <J: .J >-i !i: Cl.. <J: J... o >- >-i U o z o 0: o ,0 C> rl ;f) N :--.. (1) rl rl ,0 (f) z >-i o 0::: n. o Ct: (D [~ <I: ;E I [0 uJ J... " '."" .~ u:: u.J (f) n: Q.. 'J: I n: <J: 1: W Q.. (f) W ::=.. o o Z I I ~ uJ (f) Z 3: Z ':I: w -' :L U '.[1 3: ':I: 0 Cl.. n.. ;~. ('1.) o 0 rl rl ;f) ;f) ItN 1<1 O...l co (J' 1') ~'10 ~. ~ :I I :I :I 1f) ,....~ ~ 1f) 10 1) ;f) 0 1f) 1<) i"-. C> J) N N · OJ rl 00 ,j) ro N (f) W t11 a ,-woo. ~ L) U 0-.. WZO:n: (f) "-) <I: llJ uJ :L 07:....3: 0: u:: ::; ;J: W <J: Q..J...3:(f) n.. n: w '.[) J... o 0: Q... l1. 0::: o ll, I W :~.. , z o >-i ;..' ;.- ;..' ;.- 2' ZZZzUJ )-i >-4 t-i ~ E '3: '3: '3: <3: w ;E:E:E:E(!5 "'-"...,,':1: WWWWZ 0::: n: 0: n:<I: 'J: <J: <3: <J: :E 3:3:3:3: ;-;-;-;-.tY. J...lLJ...lLW 0000;.., (f)(f)(f)(f)::> Q.. WWuJW:E UUUUO ZZZZU <:J:<I:<J:oJ: ZZZZQ:: >-i >-i >-oi >-i 0 l1.lLJ...lLJ... -' 'J: ::> u w (f) o tY. Q.. tY. <I: :E u > 0 (f) ;.- * Z * W * :E W (.:5 'J: Z <J: :E (,0 tY. u.J ::> Q... ;E o U ()\ C> <-1 ;I) N 0"' ::> ,0 a .!) 0 N '1) ro .; ...l n: UJ N >-i ...1 >-i ('Y. u.J LL :.:: tY. <I: Q.. lL 0: ::> Z o >-i (f) >-i U W tY. Q.. o rl <-1 ;.<) N OJ) rl :~. 1 1 rl~ ~rl N (!5 o -' (D (.:5 o _1 m ",,' ..... ::> :E .,. 5 :E u ~. (f) ;2: ::> " I '.[1 W(f) >-i u.J to -'>-i::> Q..-'-' Q.. n. U ::>0. (f)::>(f) (f)" -' ;E <3: uJ 'J: n: U (f) W >-4 ZLLO: WJ...O IlS 0 lL Q: Q.. 'J: ", n. ::l ;.- ll.1 (I') m W 3: '-4 (f) z o ...j t:J: U -j Z ;2 "t.. L- o U -' o U o m ::> -' U (f) :E <J: (f) o Q: Q. rl <-1 <-1 ,{) ,'l N rl rl 1) N J) ro ,n ;f) N ...1 <3: o * * * J) ,",4 ~l) ,-{ ,f) ,-1 ,() 1Y'r 1',.: . ~..' ',-~ ;.()- ~~t (l'-' 0-. ,~. " H <I: I: Q. : ~ I ~!.J: ;11 W 0: u ~-~ _1 D [1. LL CL D u ;.-~ u.. _J <J: "> b :E uJ {~ ..J ll- W.T ::l (i: LL ;- ..~"" U.1 ,- -'ill >-i (.:5 (Xl Cl O::l :E(f) 3: 0>- Z <I: '.[) L C""l (II l:l.O (\l !:4 Lll W n: 'J: '-4 n.. W o ). Z u.J Cl >-oj (f) W ''V '..t. u.1 u.. <1: '.[) W W n:: (D ::l Q.. o o D 3: u.J ri: o I (l) ':J: :.:: ;r: 1f) :.:: -' o to ~. rl .-{ ,() N ''"'1 ...l ;I) N c) o o 3: W 0:: o I (Ii (!5 ,.v . u... :-- O:E u.. ....l ;-. >-i (flU >-iZ ....l=:J o -'U <I: :~- a.... o 0' cro- Q..~ Q.. t~: !' .(j ~N U W . I 0:: un.. <I: u.. o >- >-i U ,L ::l o :E <l: I . I I Q..I wi Cl I I I Z o >-i CL >-1 cr U ;I) W ::J I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I WI '>1 :Xl ZI 1 0::1 01 01 Zl WI >1 I :;\:1 Y-I UI wI ""'1 Ul I ,..- .-) a, ;S . . r1'\ ,-) N ro ;:) N U)U) ~ 1<J ,0 . C> 0" Q..Q..Cl cr r .X: WWrl (!5 UUU) -1 >-i >- -'-' 00 >-i Q..n.. U ?:f=~ ,""' u u.. U >-i 'x: ;.-(f) n:::l <l:fDfD 1:>-i:l I 0:: Q, ?' '- ~ Z e:]: '"') 0 :t: ", U ;.- (!5 1: Z _11 >-i....lY- Y- .~ ....l om 000 (Xl :E (f) 3: fDOO:: ll1 Z 0 u.. ~0 LL ....l 'J: o * * ;~ o o ;:) 0 00 ~N <-i ;I) ~~ ,0 ./j (!5;.-N 2"> .:lb Z(!5 .,- ;5: Z ....lW Q..(!5 Z >-i .X: .!.- (f) -~ :JJ, (f) '"" .0 ::l _JJ u_ Z: ;.- LL >-i ::J 0 :E:Z >-iQ::: (!S :E tll :::e 1: (!5 <J: ;.-(Ii ;E L :E W O....l :c tJ l-t "-i U f-- -- 7' "- ,- <J: ::l 0:: ....l00 Q..ULL ....l tJ. >-~ =:J a W U Z >-i U W 0 ~f) o U W cr >-i W ;* ;~ >-i ;~ (f) LL LL o 0:: W Z <J: fD "~ .~. 'J: (,') rL ::) CD ::l (f) ill :E ,~ U) d ~ U) N ..() ~ rl ;I) ,',4 ~.. ~0 ,~.. ;~- (,) 'J'. . . . <;j' rl ,..{ o ,(j 0 1f)Nrl o o -0 Ul ll1 ,f) ::JO Q: cr Q: 0 :.L! W ::l ;-- 3: 3' <<W>-i 3: (f) ....l _11 ww (fl(f) LL <J: 'J: 0 II UU >- 0:: '... ::l =:J (f) .~ Q.. Q.. :.11 U ~-i ! 0:: Q:'- >- ill W >-i ,;J: ;.- 3: -' ,D <:J:w>-i -:;: '0 ;.- ':J" - . ::l ~ cr D:: Z ;.- ;- a D 3c-J>-i;.- ....l ~ ; ,. * .f) .f) .0 ,_) rl <-i ;.- ;1. ..J ([ ;~ ;~ LL * o >- >-i U I ;;.- 'J: fD <1: Y- "'- "- o ~...... ~ ~ '-'I N ?() 0.... ~..... o (X) ~ rl :..0 . 11) ,1.) ~ ...1 rl :::- o (!l Z Lll (!5 (,f) Lll Q.. o ....l ;.11 :~- Z ill o u (5 Z >-i Z >-i (1: >.L. ,;J: Y': Z o C> ;:) o (,) W Cl n: LU eJ: 3: (!) 2: ,~ (f) LtJ 0:: uJ 'J: 3: u "-0( J:!... ,.-~ ....l U u: UJ ~ ~.. >- ,.... u ...:::. >-i 3: a~ ~ ,-1 :.f) N 0" ,..1 . ~:) 0... ;~. ,'..) (',1 [Y. [:( <I: .;J: (5 (!5 >- ). ~ ~~ U U :r: U >-i 3: (fJ <J: <l: o Z o >-1 .X: U H Z ::) :E ,!.- o U ,...l LU ! 'J: (''l n: Lll :> C> ;...~ ~ ;() N N (J] :...... .'0'''' N) ~- ~- 1<) if) 11) N1f) -0 (X) o a, WWU) 00 ~ [".t: W UJ <J: 'J: 3: 3: >< <J: Z (Ii .~ "-. <J: 0 ,!.- (Ii[Y. Q.. 0:: ;.L! >-i u..1 ..J =:J;.->-i O'wu.. ill ;C (f) rx: n: ::l W ll1 ;.-;.-[1: .'" 'J' 0 ]~ 3: u... + >-i 'J: L. 0.. >-i ::l 0' LU (!5 " ,,- :E o , 'J: Q.. ;~ ::l ;~ D ;~ 0:: (!5 0:: >-i .X: Q. :.L! 0:: (f) >-i Cl [1: ill ..J >-i l1. 'J: >-i 0:: o U >-i vi ::l ,'-) N rl fj N ~- .~ ~ ('j rl Il N non 6U)6 ! I ! ;:) <;j' U) ,-1 <;,1' ;~. ~- ,..1 r 0 ,..1 if) 0-' N t!.} u: 0" ?- UJ ~W ~ 2: Z ?- >-i ;;r (!5 -'Z Q..w Q. ::l o cr t!5 Z n w << >= ;c (f) w W U 0;.- Z Q...x: .X: O.~ I ;- U Z 0 u.1 (!5.. (Ii (Ii ~~" 2: 0 (0 '() >-i ?- <1- 7-[1:'5 . Dwio >-i 111 Z (,') Z 0 <l: >-i>-i0 >(!50m wZ3:(Ii Q: W tll 3: cr (f)fDOO:: >-i Lll I 0 (!5 LL (,0 LL ....l <l: o ._1 <:J: o ;~ (f) * ;.L! '*- 'J: .~ U o (f) (Ii << o "'. ,,- ';J: m (Ii 3: 11) N rl U) 0-~ ,..- " N <-i ;1) .4 r"'- ,{j . r.... N 0:: << (5 0" ro . U) ,0 U) r fJ.... N ~ )- >-i U z .~ <3: :E: C1.. >-i ::l a ;.l1 * * * U Z H 0:: ill , ...4 (!5 W >-i :...~ o ....... ....... IJ"'l ....... .- M M N ~ o ~ III III < ~ o ~ tf.l ~ U r.d ;:r: U E-t tf.l H ...:r ~. E-t o E-t ~ o ~ III III < ~ U ~ u ...:r ~ o E-t -.;t QJ (l() III III * * * Payroll Register Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 214339 BASTYR CONNIE D 255.03 4/13/99 214340 BETTS GRAYDON D 258.72 4/13/99 214341 BLECHTA HEATHER A 39.37 4/13/99 214342 BLECHTA RYAN C 21.47 4/13/99 214343 BROWN LA WRENCE A 1,620.85 4/13/99 214344 BUHL SUSAN E 130.62 4/13/99 214345 COLE ANGELA M 664.99 4/13/99 214346 DA VIS CHARLES S 897.36 4/13/99 . 214347 GROUT TWILA R 698.48 4/13/99 214348 HEBERT KATHLEEN A 529.0Q 4/13/99 214349 HELGESEN PATRICIA R 571.12 4/13/99 214350 HELLING PAMELA J 592.87 4/13/99 214351 HEURKINS MARK K 321.70 4/13/99 214352 HURM JAMES C 1,805.64 4/13/99 214353 JAKEL BRIAN D 175.55 4/13/99 214354 JENSEN JEFFREY A 926.65 4/13/99 214355 JOHNSON DENNIS D 930.01 4/13/99 214356 JONES DEBRA J 435.66 4/13/99 214357 JOSEPHSON KELLY F 46.53 4/13/99 . 214358 JOSEPHSON WILLIAM F 629.86 4/13/99 214359 KARSTEN MARK R 21.47 4/13/99 214360 LANGLEY DANIEL W 94.88 4/13/99 . 214361 LATTERNER SUSAN M 664.99 4/13/99 214362 LEE JASON D 198.61 4/13/99 214363 LUGOWSKI JOSEPH P 813.36 4/13/99 214364 LUND JASON R 297.78 4/13/99 214365 MARRON RUSSELL R 40.10 4/13/99 214366 MASON BRADLEY J 768.88 4/13/99 Tuesday, April 13, 1999 Page 1 of2 Page 5 fl" 1 Check # Last Name First Name MI Check Amt Check Date 214367 NAAB THERESA L 672.88 4/13/99 214368 NICCUM LA WRENCE A 1,182.83 4/13/99 214369 NIELSEN BRADLEY J 908.39 4/13/99 214370 PAZANDAK JOSEPH E 1,165.28 4/13/99 214371 POUNDER CHRISTOPHER J 943.21 4/13/99 214372 RANDALL DANIEL J 918.13 4/13/99 214373 REINSTRA BRIAN C 26.84 4/13/99 214374 ROERICK BRIAN M 92.34 4/13/99 214375 ROLEK ALAN J 1,204.74 4/13/99 214376 SCHMID CHRISTOPHER E 483.49 4/13/99 . Total of Checks $22,049.68 . Tuesday, April 13, 1999 Page 2 of2 Page 6