The URL can be used to link to this page

012599 CC Reg AgPSCANNED CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 1999 7:00 P.M. The City Council will convene at 5:00 p.m. in the Conference Room in Executive Session to discuss litigation status of Eagle Crest vs. City of Shorewood. The City Council will meet in a Special Session at 5:30 p.m. to interview for performance evaluation services. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Love Stover Garfunkel Lizee Zerby B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes January 7, 1999 (Att. -#2A Minutes) B . City Council Executive Session Minutes January 7, 1999 (Att. -#2B Minutes) C. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 11, 1999 (Att.42C Minutes) D. City Council Executive Session Minutes January 11, 1999 (Att. - #2D Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Making Appointments on the Park and Planning Commissions (Att. - #3A Proposed Resolution) B . A Motion to Approve an Agreement for Performance Evaluation Services C . A Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 202 — Park Commission (Att. - #3C Proposed Ordinance) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Favoring Continuation of Funding for Senior Programs (Att. - #3D Proposed Resolution) NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked following removal from Consent Agenda. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 25, 1999 PAGE 2 OF 2 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative Report on January 13, 1999 Park Commission Meeting (Att. - #5 Draft Minutes) 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit (Att.- #6 Planner's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution) Applicant: Bradley Bloss Location: 5170 Howard's Point Road 7. 7:15 P.M. — CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION APPROVING CONCEPT OF IMPROVEMENTS AT COUNTY ROAD 19 /SMITHTOWN ROAD INTERSECTION (Att. -#7 Engineer's Memorandum) 8. 8:15 P.M. — DISCUSSION WITH POLICE CHIEF ON CONTRIBUTION FOR PURCHASE OF SNOWMOBILE 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES (Att. -#9 Proposed Agreement) 10. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS A. Staff Report on Development Monitoring B . Report on Message Left on the Shoreline (Att. - #10B Messages) C. Planner's Report Regarding Property on Suburban Drive D. Planner's Report on Tax Forfeit Property - 25575 Smithtown Road E. Attorney's Report on Agreement for Land Appraisal Services 11. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Consider a Request to Plow the Southshore Center Lot (Att. -#11A Administrator's Memorandum) B . Consider Establishing Priorities for the City in 1999 (Att. -#11B 1999 List of Issues) 12. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att. - #12) W Planning Commission Update Commissioner Anderson • Developed a work plan for the first half of 1999. Will address the comp plan section by section with a final review of the total plan in summer 1999. This will include neighborhood meetings and final recommendations on the full plan to the city council after neighborhood meetings. • Working on review of the Lake Shore Recreational zoning district ordinance. • Chose a new chair person (Commissioner Callies) and alternative chair (Commissioner Collins). • Met & welcomed the new Planning Commissioner members. SCANNED CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 - 8927• (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Regular Meeting Monday, January 25, 1999 The Council will convene in Executive Session at the request of the City Attorney to discuss the Eagle Crest lawsuit at 5:00 p.m. ,�. The Council meets in special session at 5:30 p.m. in the conference room to interview for performance evaluation services. Agenda Item #3A: This resolution accepts the recommendations of the Planning r Commission for Paula Callies for Chair and Patrick Collins for Vice -Chair and the Park Commission for Pat Arnst and Ken Dallman as Co- Chair. Agenda Item #3B: The action here would be a motion to authorize execution of an agreement for performance evaluation services as a result of the interviews held during the special meeting prior to the regular meeting. Agenda Item #3C: This action amends the Park Commission ordinance to be consistent t with the Planning Commission ordinance establishing the terms to go from February 1 to January 31 or until the vacancy is filled. Agenda Item #3D: Each year the City of Shorewood has passed a resolution in support of Senior Community Services receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for programmed services. As a member of the CDBG Consolidated Pool Advisory Committee, I can assure you that joint projects such as this receive added points in our funding formula. Over the last three years the small west end of Hennepin County cities "pool" their CDBG funds instead of each city receiving a small amount. Shorewood's allocation had been around $18,000 per year. The City has set aside CDBG funds in the past for the Center and has passed resolutions of support for CDBG funding of Center programs since the inception of the consolidated pool. Agenda Item #6: Mr. Bradley Bloss proposes to build an attached garage, which, when combined with other accessory buildings on his property (5170 Howard's Point Road), will exceed 1200 square feet. Shorewood's zoning regulations require a conditional use permit in such instances. The Planner's memorandum states that the request complies with the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on 5 January, and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the CUP. Approval requires a four - fifths vote by the City Council. .� �-�� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of January 25, 1999 Page 2 Agenda Item #7: Mr. Chuck Rickart from WSB and Associates, Inc. (City Engineering Consultants) have completed a traffic study for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 19, Smithtown Road, and Country Club Road. This motion, if approved, indicates to Hennepin County the desired concept plan that the City of Shorewood desires. This report will be presented in detail at the meeting. Staff is recommending that the third alternative which involves realignment of the intersection in total, installation of a traffic signal, and relocation of the Tonka Bay liquor store as the preferred alternative. This item is a motion with a simple majority vote for approval. Agenda Item #8: Police Chief Bryan Litsey has indicated he can be here by 8:15 p.m. to discuss with the City Council his request for $500 for the purchase of a second snowmobile. Agenda Item #9: This is an agreement for legal services with Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren. It includes a monthly retainer (Section 5a). This is a different approach in that in the past legal services have been based upon an hourly rate. e • CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 1999 5:00 P.M. MINUTES Mft 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Mayor Love called the Special Meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby; and Administrator Jim Hurm B . Review Agenda There were no changes to the agenda as presented. 2. INTERVIEWS FOR CITY ATTORNEY POSITION The City Council conducted interviews with the following: 5:10 p.m. Suesan Lea Pace and others of Campbell & Knutson, PA 5:42 p.m. Kevin Johnson of Doherty, Rumble & Butler 6:02 p.m. Tim Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren 6:30 p.m. John Dean of Kennedy & Graven 3. DISCUSSION IN PREPARATION FOR APPOINTMENT RESOLUTION - DIRECTION TO STAFF Councilmember Garfunkel raised concerns that the Council is moving very quickly on reviewing City Attorney candidates. Following a brief discussion, Councilmember Stover moved, Lizee seconded, to proceed to select a City Attorney. Mayor Love indicated he would like to have a fuller request for proposal process to begin in September to be completed in December, 1999. Stover accepted this as an amendment to her motion, Lizee agreed. Motion passed unanimously. Following discussion on the City Attorney interviews, the majority of the City Council indicated Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren is their number one choice. They directed staff to prepare the appointment resolution with Tim Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren as the City Attorney. The Mayor and Council reviewed the various appointments for Resolution No. 99 -001, and direction was given to staff to advertise in the local paper for the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission representative. Following discussion on the City's official newspaper, it was indicated that the Sun Sailor should be listed as the City's official newspaper, but that a policy should be included to publish all notices in the Laker as well to cover the Island residents. �zA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - JANUARY 7, 1999 PAGE 2 6. DISCUSSION ON SENIOR HOUSING MORATORIUM - DIRECTION TO STAFF The Council moved to Item #6 on the agenda. Councilmember Stover indicated she feels no action is needed at this time in that the senior housing moratorium lifts on February 8. At 8:15 p.m., the Council recessed. 7. PLANNING & PARK COMMISSION INTERVIEWS The meeting was reconvened at 8:25 p.m. in the conference room for interviews of those interested in being appointed to Planning and Park Commissions. Members of the Council asked questions regarding background, opinions on City policies, and overall philosophies for the following candidates: Planning Commission: 8:25 p.m. Donna Woodruff, 4485 Highland Circle - 8:36 p.m. Matthew Goldstein, 4865 Regents Walk 8:48 p.m. Laura Turgeon, 24670 Amlee Road 8:55 p.m. Tom Skramstad, 28020 Woodside Road 9:10 P.M. Carrie Halvorson, 4495 Enchanted Island Park Commission: 9:25 p.m. Ken Dallman, 5780 Eureka Road Mary Bensman, 20960 Ivy Lane (was unable to attend) The City Council then continued with the special meeting. 4. DISCUSSION ON THE SIZE AND MAKEUP OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION It was suggested that staff prepare an ordinance to increase the size of the Planning Commission from five members to seven. It was also indicated that the ordinance should be changed to indicate, beginning in the year 2000, terms would begin February 1 and end on January 31. 0 Councilmember Garfunkel indicated concern that a broader process be followed to make these changes. The ordinance will be prepared for the January 11 meeting. Council directed staff to prepared a resolution of appointment for official action at the January 11 meeting with Donna Woodruff, Laura Turgeon and Tom Skramstad to be appointed for three year terms to the Planning Commission; and Ken Dallman and Mary Bensman for three year terms to the Park Commission. 5. DISCUSSION ON A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT It was felt that this item should be removed from the January 11 agenda and be placed on the agenda for the first meeting in February when Guy Peterson from the Metro Council could be asked to attend to discuss the issue with the Council. Councilmember Stover indicated her interest in including one of the goals from a previous Shorewood resolution which includes 60 units of senior housing. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - JANUARY 7, 1999 PAGE 3 6. DISCUSSION ON SENIOR HOUSING MORATORIUM This item was discussed following Item #3. 7. PLANNING & PARK INTERVIEWS The Council conducted following Item #6 - see above. 8. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION There being no further business, the Council adjourned at 10:13 p.m. to go into Executive Session to review the Administrator's performance. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR • JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 1999 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION 'AFf Mayor Love called the Executive Session to order at 10:20 p.m. Dn A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby; and Administrator Jim Hurm B . Review Agenda There were no changes to the agenda as presented. 2. REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATOR'S PERFORMANCE The City Council met privately until 10:40 p.m. when Administrator Hurm joined the meeting. The Administrator's performance was reviewed. It was determined that a performance review should continue in Executive Session following the next Council meeting. 3. ADJOURN Mayor Love adjourned the meeting at 12:05 a.m. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR #03 CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1999 7:00 P.M. MINUTES Ceremonial Swearing In of Mayor Love, and Councilmembers Lizee and Zerby took place at 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING __ , Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 1 A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby; Administrator Jim Hurm; City Attorney Tim Keane; Planning Director Brad Nielsen; Finance Director Al Rolek; and Engineer Larry Brown. • Absent: None. B . Review Agenda Mayor Love read the Agenda for January 11, 1999. The agenda was accepted as amended: Councilmember Lizee requested item 3A be removed from the Consent Agenda and moved to item 6B. C . Presentation of Appreciation Administrator Hurm presented a 15 year appreciation certificate to Brad Nielsen and Patty Helgeson. Mayor Love then thanked the staff for their commitment, and the fine job done over the years. D . A Motion Making Appointments for 1999 • Administrator Hurm reviewed the annual appointments needed, as listed on Resolution 99 -001. Councilmember Stover requested that the Lake Minnetonka Communication Commission appointment remain open, as there are interested parties, and this position should be advertised. Councilmember Garfunkel expressed disappointment in the process of appointments, noting insufficient time to consider all applicants, examine documentation and information, to make a decision. Lizee moved, Stover seconded to Adopt RESOLUTIONS #99 -001 "Making Appointments for 1999." Motion passed 4/1 (Garfunkel abstained). 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - December 21, 1998 Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded to approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of December 21, 1998, as presented. The motion passed 510. r� r CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 11, 1999 - PAGE 2 B . City Council Special Meeting and Executive Session Meeting Minutes - January 4, 1999 Stover moved, Lizee seconded to approve the City Council Special Meeting and Executive Session Meeting Minutes of January 4, 1999, as presented. The motion passed 510. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Lizee moved, Stover seconded approving the Motions contained on the Consent Agenda as amended, and Adopting the Resolutions therein: A. A Motion Establishing the Date for the Local Board of Review — Removed to Item 6B B . A Motion Approving a Sign Permit. Applicant: First State Bank Location: 19765 State Highway 7 Planning Director Nielsen explained the signage existing for the applicant, noting this is actually replacement of an existing sign. Motion passed 4/1 (Zerby abstain). 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none at this time. 5. PLANNING - Report by Representative Planning Director Nielsen reported on the meeting of January 5, 1999 as reported in the minutes, and pointed out that the Planning Commissioners have invited the members of the City Council to the next meeting on January 19. 6 A. A Motion Establishing the Date for the Local Board of Review Councilmember Lizee pointed out the Wednesday night may not be the best night for the public to attend a meeting, as it conflicts with many church activities. Monday night, April 19 was suggested as an alternative. Administrator Hurm will notify the County that the alternative date is the preferred choice. Lizee moved, Stover seconded to Establish the Date for the Local Board of Review as Wednesday, April 19, 1999. Motion passed unanimously. 6B. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION APPROVING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 201 - PLANNING COMMISSION • • Administrator Hurm reported that this motion changes the membership of the Planning Commission to 7 members and all terms will start February 1, through January 31, with the exception of those made in January, 1999 which will become effective immediately. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 11, 1999 - PAGE 3 Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concerns that the pros and cons of this decision were not discussed, and the issues have not been explored. Also, the members of the Planning Commission were not consulted. Councilmember Lizee pointed out that when the Planning Commission was changed to 5 members, the decision was not received with favor among the public, and there was no discussion at all. Also, 7 members will improve representation. Mayor Love also agreed that representation needed to be restored, and a 7 member Commission would aid that goal. Stover moved, Lizee seconded Adopting ORDINANCE NO. 348 "Amending Municipal Code Chapter 201 - Planning Commission. Motion passed 411 (Garfunkel abstained). 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS Administrator Hurm pointed out that with the amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 201, the terms would actually be through 2002, not through 2001. Councilmember Garfunkel would also like the Park Commission terms to change to February 1 through January 31. Lizee moved, Zerby seconded to adopt RESOLUTION # 99 -002 "Making Appointments to Commissions." Motion passed 510. 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION APPROVING 1999 TREE TRIMMERS LICENSES Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION # 99 -003 "Approving 1999 Tree Trimmers Licenses." Motion passed 510. 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION ADOPTING A YEAR 2000 POLICY i Administrator Hurm reported on some of the year 2000 issues, and some of the projects that need attention. The League of Minnesota Cities recommends adopting this plan. Garfunkel moved, Zerby seconded to Adopt the Year 2000 Policy as presented. Motion passed 510. 10. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE FOR $500 TOWARD A SNOWMOBILE PURCHASE Administrator Hurm explained that the Police Department currently has one snowmobile, and would like to have a second for safety and backup reasons. Some fund raising has been done, and the Police Department has asked the four cities each to donate $500 toward the purchase price of a new snowmobile. Councilmember Lizee asked if the Police Department has applied for a grant. Administrator Hurm answered that they had, but that goes toward overtime, and not toward the actual machines. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 11, 1999 - PAGE 4 Councilmember Stover stated that the Park Commission should be reviewing how effective the snowmobile patrol and signs have been this year. She noted several complaints she has received about curfew violations, and explained people have been reluctant to call 911 to complain. Councilmember Garfunkel pointed out that having two officers together is a safety issue. He felt a single officer alone is often a dangerous situation. Councilmember Zerby stated that Shorewood bought the first snowmobile, and they don't get all the police protection from that. Mayor Love added that he lives near the trail, and some areas are definitely worse regarding curfew violations and excessive speed. He then pointed out that this is not a referendum on snowmobiling, but an enforcement issue, and a safety issue for the officer. Councilmember Garfunkel agreed that the snowmobile issues can be discussed separately, ant that this is a law enforcement and safety issue. Mayor Love suggested someone from the Police Department could come to speak at a Council meeting to answer questions on this issue. Councilmember Garfunkel stated that this was done last spring, which is why he feels so strongly that the officer's safety is at stake. Councilmember Lizee requested more information on how the Police Department will use a second snowmobile. Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded to Consider a Request from the Chief o f Police for $500 Toward a Snowmobile Purchase. Motion failed 2/3 (Garfunkel & Love in favor; Lizee, Stover & Zerby abstained). 11. DISCUSSION ON ISSUES AND GOALS FOR 1999 Administrator Hurm presented some issues and concerns identified by staff, and asked the Council to add to it and prioritize the list. Councilmember Stover suggested adding the snowmobile issue, and an awards system. Councilmember Zerby suggested adding the reconstruction issues, especially those pertaining to property rights on Smithtown Road. I2. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS A . Staff Report on Development Monitoring Engineer Brown reported that there has been very little activity of late. Planning Director Nielsen reported on a Conditional Use Permit application received from Minnewashta Elementary School for additional classrooms. He also informed them of issues regarding an existing billboard in Gideon Woods. He noted the billboard is non - conforming, but the City has been questioned about the legality of the City's agreement with the original developer. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 11, 1999 - PAGE 5 B . Administrator's Report Administrator Hurm pointed out that the Special Fire Department Review Committee meeting will be held January 12. Also, the League Conference for Newly Elected Officials is coming up soon. He pointed out the following issues that will need to be discussed in the very near future: Country Club /Smithtown Road intersection improvement; options regarding participation in the Metropolitan Transit System; future of land conservation report; disaster preparedness; and the policy survey. 13. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Love reported that a meeting was held with Attorney Keane and Administrator Hurm discussing ways to keep the City legal fees down. 14. ADJOURNMENT Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded to adjourn the regular meeting to an Executive Session at 8:26 p.m. subject to approval of claims. Motion passed 510. The Council reconvened at 8:59 p.m. Mayor Love adjourned the regular meeting at 8:59 p.m. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Kristine Kitzman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off -Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR U CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1999 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Love called the Executive Session to order at 8:27 p.m. 113 M; A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Love; Councilmembers Stover, Garfunkel, Lizee and Zerby B . Review Agenda There were no changes to the agenda as presented. 2. REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATOR'S PERFORMANCE The City Council met privately to discuss the performance of Administrator Hurm. 3. ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION Mayor Love adjourned the Executive Session meeting at 8:58 p.m. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99— A RESOLUTION MAKING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held January 11, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -002 making appointments to the Planning and Park Commissions. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council shall make the following Planning and Park Commission position appointments for the year 1999: Planning Commission: Chairperson Paula Callies Vice Chairperson Patrick Collins • Park Commission: Co- Chairperson Pat Arnst and Ken Dallman ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of January, 1999. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR U 1*3A- CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 202 OF THE SHOREWOOD CODE OF ORDINANCES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 202.02 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is amended to read as follows: Subd. 1. Membership in the Commission: Membership shall consist of up to seven (7) residents of the City appointed by the City Council. Terms of all members shall be for three (3) Exception: Those appointments made in January. 1999 shall be effective immediately upon passage of the appointment resolution. The City Council shall designate one of its members as its liaison to meet with the Park Commission, and it shall direct the Park Commission to designate one member of its body as a liaison person to meet with the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission shall designate one member of its body as a liaison to meet with the Park Commission'. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and enter its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this 25th day of January, 1999. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR *3C F" � ia -�3D SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES d � ✓ ; 10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone 541 -1 d BOARD of DIRECTORS John Nelson President January 15, 1999 Dwight Johnson 1st Vice President Peggy Kelly 2nd Vice President Mayor Woody Love and City Council Members City of Shorewood Laurie Lafontaine Treasurer 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Francis Hagen Secretary Dear Mayor Love and Council Members: Kevin Krueger Past President * ry As has been done for two years, Senior Community Services Henning �ffember -at -Lar requests that the City of Shorewood pass, and send back to us, a resolution favoring a continuation of funding the senior programs Dr. C. (Ike) Njaka that the City has supported in the past. A sample resolution is Member -at -Large attached for your consideration. We would like to include the John Boeder resolution in our application to the Consolidated Pool for the next Peter Coyle Community Development Block Grant year which must be Robert DeGhetto Marty Guritz submitted by March 12, 1999. Aiko Higuchi Gloria Johnson The contact person for our request is our Southshore Senior Kathleen Miller Senator Gen Olson Center Director, Joyce Flury (474 - 7977). On behalf of the area Curtis Pearson seniors who are the direct beneficiaries of the services, our thanks Neil Peterson for your continued support of the Southshore Senior Center. We Dan Ryerson look forward to continuing cooperation between the City of Mary Tambornino eonard J. Thiel Shorewood and Senior Community Services. m Ticen Benjamin F. Withhart Again, many thanks for your support. Executive Director & C.E.O. Sincerely, PROGRAMS - f !// 7 / iN'� • Community �` Senior Groups & Ron Bloch Multi- purpose Senior Centers Program Administrator • H.O.M.E. • Senior Outreach cc: Jim Hurm, City Manager F" � ia -�3D CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99— A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONTINUATION OF CDBG FUNDING FOR THE SOUTHSHORE SENIOR CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has supported services for its elderly and disable residents via Senior Community Services' Southshore Senior Center with the allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood feels that the provision of services for its elderly and disabled residents is of great importance and should be continued. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota: That the City of Shorewood recommends to the Consolidated Pool Selection Committee that CDBG funding of Senior Community Services' Southshore Senior Center be continued. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of January, 1999. ATTEST WOODY LOVE, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • e & i CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PARK COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1999 7:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING Commissioner Dallman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p. m. A. Roll Call • Present: Commissioners, Dallman, Artist, Colopoulos, Themig, and Cochran Commissioner Bensman (arrived 7:35 p.m.) Administrator JimHurm; Park Planner, Mark Koegler Absent: Chair Puzak; Council Liaison Scott Zerby B. Review Agenda Administrator Hum asked that item #6 be puffed from the agenda and said that item #5 will be only a brief report. The Commission agreed to those changes. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Mnutes of November 24, 1998 Commissioner Dallman pointed out that the header date on pages 2 through 6 was incorrect. The change will be made to November 10, 1998. Commissioner Colopoulos asked for clarification of list item #7 on page 5. It will be changed to say: "We have yet to consider the islands ". • Themig moved, Colopoulos seconded, to accept the minutes as amended. The motion passed unanimously. B. Park Commission Mnutes of December 8, 1998 Arnst moved, Themig seconded, to accept the minutes as presented. The motion passed 510 with Colopoulos abstaining. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Administrator Huml explained that Council Liaison Scott arby could not make the meeting. He then reported about the request from the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department (SLAPS D) for $500 to help fund the purchase of a snowmobile. Hurm reminded the Commissioners about a previous request for snowmobile funding where the Park Commission suggested that the SLMPSD look into other funding options. Some money was made available, but there was still a shortage and SLMPSD has now approached each of the four Cities they serve to make up the balance. The City Council has asked that the Police Chief, Bryan Litsey, attend their next meeting m further �i I. Park Commission Meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1999 Page 2 explain the request. The Council has also directed the Park Commission to stay active on this issue and make a recommendation back to them. It was agreed that Hurm will invite the newly appointed Police Chief to attend the next Park Commission meeting as well. 4. TRAIL REVIEW Park Planner Koegler explained that the first couple of items are carryovers from previous meetings which need some final approval. Modifications have been made to the evaluation form and line items were added regarding goals and objectives. A. Approve Trail Site Evaluation Form Commissioner Themig asked if a follow -up question should be provided for a "No" response to • question B. Bensman agreed that it would be good to have documentation as to why any certain trail segment was not developed. Koegler will add a line or two to allow for further explanation of a "why not" response. Themig also asked how a segment is defined. Would it be block to block or from point "A" lo point "B ", for example? Koegler replied that it would be identified from some origin point to some terminus. Administrator Hunn suggested that stEdf be removed from the final section which shows approval, rejection and date of action. Themig added that the approval (or non - approval) will be shown in the CIP. Koegler suggested that the last section be replaced with a space to record what action, if any, was taken with reference to the trail segment under consideration. Themig added that the word, "rejected" sounds too strong. Dallman asked Koegler to make changes to the bottom section accordingly. Colopoulos noted that everything above the dotted line is data, except for question `B" which calls for an evaluation. Hurm suggested that the final part could simply state the Park Commission Recommendation and Date, plus Council Action with Date. Themig asked about a rating system for prioritizing. It was agreed that discussion sessions are the appropriate place to prioritize, Colopoulos added that this form authenticales the development of a particular segment without requiring immediate construction of it. Koegler pointed out that the revised form can still be adjusted. It serves as a working model. Bensman asked if the School District should be included in part "F ", Administration Review. Hurm stated that they may not want to be obligated to attend meetings, but he will ask the Transportation Director, since they could offer some details that would be helpful to the process and to their own needs. Themig asked about the role of utilities such as NSP and Minnegasco who are also included in part "F. " Koegler explained that they may be able to flag major hurdles. Part "I" was also discussed. It was agreed that it indicates prioritization, which may be premature to include at this point. It will be scratched There were no other comments. B. Approve Goals, Objectives and Policies Koegler explained that the current draft is a carryover with language changes as previously discussed. The order of iterns has also been adjusted according to prior meeting outcomes. Dalhnan asked if it Park Commission Meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1999 Page 3 was agreeable to everyone that these points do accurately state the goals, objectives and policies. Themig moved that the Park Commission adopt the Trail Planning Goals, Objectives and Policies as presented. Cochran seconded and the motion passed unanimously. C. Complete Trail Concept Map With Identified Alignments Koegler prefaced the map- drawing session by stating that the fast step is to finish the designation of any more potential sites. They will then step back and select the four or five segments that make the most sense. This is part of the preparation for the first public meeting. Colopoulos reiterated that these sites are "potential" rather than "planned" trail segments. The segments that were added to the map as potential sites were: Smithtown Road from Eureka Road, west to the Victoria border (linking m Victoria's trail system) Howard's Point Road from Smithtown to Edgewood Cathcart Road from Smithtown to the LRT Trail Vine Hill Road Covington Road from Vine Hill Road to Silverwood Park St. Albans Bay Road fromMinnet3onkaBlvd. to Manor Park NO Street fromthe Chanhassen border (linking to their trail system) to Excelsior Some comments made in discussion: Koegler commented that when this map is compared with the old Trail Plan of 1992, there are many of the same segments and there are some segments which are not common to both. He also reiterated that the Park Commission is identifying some areas to walk for just a starting point These are not sited as trails to be built, but trails to evaluate in the spring. Bensman and Colopoulos noted that the interest for a trail in the west part of Shorewood is high making it very practical to include on the map. It may even serve as a model for future development of trails. • Themig asked if the next draft of the map could be less cluttered and adjacent cities be drawn with shading to distinguish the boundaries of Shorewood for ease of reading at the community open house. Also, could we add an estimated completion date to the various segments? Tbe Park Commission should not be timid in identifying potential segments. Alittle "dissension" will encourage response from the community and greater attendance at the open house. Some points of interest discussed were Crescent Beach and downtown Excelsior. Arnst asked if a partnership with the City of Minnetonka could be considered for the Vine Hill trail segment. It was agreed that Vine Hill Road is very hilly and dangerous and therefore warrants a trail on both sides of the street. Park Commission Meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1999 Page 4 D. Identify Priority Alignments The following potential trail sites were selected as priority alignments: Smithtown Road from Eureka Road, west to the Victoria bonier (linking b their trail system) Howard's Point Road from Smithtown to Edgewood Vine Hill Road Covington Road from Vine Hill Road to S ilverwood Park St. Alban's Bay Road from MinnetonkaBlvd. to Manor Park Mill Street from the Chanhassen border (linking to their trail system) to Excelsior There was a five minute break. E. Prepare for Public Information Meetings 1. Date and Times: Administrator Hurm suggested the fourth Tuesday of February which is typically the dale of Park Commission work sessions or special meetings. The date and time agreed to was Tuesday, February 23, 1999 from 4 :30 p. m to 730 p. m. The location will be at the Southshore Community Center. 2. Further Data Needed: Illustrations or photos of various trail designs will be provided, showing several options including on street and off - street trails. Information showing the reference and research work that has been done up to this point will also be available. Comment cards will be on hand for residents to complete. 3. Role of Park Commission: At least one Park Commissioner will be present throughout the three hours. Arrival times of the Commissioners will be: 4:30 Themig and Dallman; 5:15 Arnst; 6:00 Cochran, Colopoulos and Bensman. (Puzak was not present to offer an arrival time.) 4. Format for MeetinLY: It will be an informal "open house" format with attractive visual displays such as maps, policy statements, outline of the process. Some staff and Council Members may be present as observers, but the Park Commission will be hosting the event 5. Format of Newsletter Insert: Include a brief summary of survey results and history of the trail planning process. Offer options for feedback such as the Shoreline number, e-mail address, but do not include a "clip- out - and - return" response form. That may discourage attendance at the open house. (Commissioner Themig mentioned that he will be attending an open house regarding DNR grant programs on January 14. There may be information provided which is of interest to the Park Commission.) 5. REPORT ON DRAFT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION POLICY Commissioner Arnst reported that Themig, Hump and she have met and fine-tuned the language of the Athletic Association Policy. They would like to present a recommendation for a formula needed to determine costs of park use. Staff is working on estimates. A full report, including some sample formulas will be presented at the February 10 Park Commission meeting. The policy concept will be presented ID the sports organizations before a recommendation is made b Council. Park Commission Meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1999 Page 5 6. DISCUSS DESIGN CONCEPT AND LOCATION OF FREEMAN PARK MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING Postponed to Febnzary meeting. 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1999 PARK COMMISSION OFFICERS AND LIAISON TO PLANNING COMMIS S ION Colopoulos stated that he would like to make a motion on the fast part of this agenda item Colopoulos moved, Cochran seconded the nomination of Ken Dallman as Park Commission Chair and Pat Arnst as Vice Chair for 1999. Themig asked Dalknan if he is interested in the position. Dallman replied yes, his is willing to accept • the role of Chair. Bensman asked about the policy of Vice Chair moving to the Chair position for the following year. (Commissioner Arnst's tennis to end after this next year.) Hurm said that it is tradition for the Vice Chair to roll into the Chair position after one year, but it is not a requirement Bensman asked if a motion was still on the table, explaining that she would like to nominate Pat Arrest as Chair since her term will end in January 2000. Dallman said he would be willing to step down from the nomination. Colopoulos suggested an amendment to the active motion. Themig asked if Dallman would no longer serve as Park Foundation Liaison if he served as Chair and said he would hate to lose Datiman from that role. Dallman said he would probably not do both jobs. Arnst was asked if she would consider serving on the Park Commission after the end of this term. She did not know. Arnst suggested the idea of appointing two Co-Chairs. Huhn read from the Municipal Code and found that there was not an objection stated there. Colopoulos amended the motion to recommend to the City Council that Ken Dallman and Pat Arrest serve as Co- Chairs on the Park Commission for 1999. Cochran seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Hurm asked for clarification on the Vice Chair position. It was verified that here will be no Vice Chair. Commissioner Colopoulos volunteered to serve as Liaison to the Planning Commission. He explained that he may be interested in serving as aPlanning Commissioner after his Park Commission term ends and would like to explore that possibility. Themig moved and Arnst seconded that the Park Commission designate Bill Colopoulos as Planning Commission Liaison for 1999. The motion passed unanimously. Park Commission Meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1999 Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULE OF PARK LIAISONS TO COUNCIL Park Commissioners will attend the 1999 City Council men following schedule: January Arnst February Themig April Dallman May Cochran July Puzak August Arnst October Colopoulos November Dallman stings as liaison according to the March Colopoulos June Bensman September Themig December Puzak 9. DISCUSSION ON A COMMISSION WORK PLAN FOR 1999 The work plan for 1999 will clearly include the trail process and multi- purpose building at Freeman Park To prepare a month -by -month work plan for 1999, the new Co -chaos of the Park Commission will work on some ideas and present a draftplan to discuss at the next Park Commission meeting. 10. OLD BUSINESS I* Commissioner Arnst asked to revisit the issue of the Wagner property. She noted that Chair Puzak has mentioned a concern for the 30 foot strip of land which could alleviate safety and traffic problems at Freeman Park. She asked if the Park Commission could prepare a letter to the City Council and the Planning Commission to let them know of this strong interest and to document the concern for the record. Hurm said that he does not know the current status of the land's availability, but the suggestion is a good one. Colopoulos and Cochran also agreed that it would be a good idea. Arnst moved and Cochran seconded that the Park Commission draft a letter of recommendation to the Planning Commission and the City Council to state that in the event the acquisition and/or development of the Wagner property comes before the City, the Park Commission requests 30 to 50 feet of land to improve safety of the ball field area. The motion passed unanimously. 11. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 12. ADJOURNMENT Colopoulos moved, Themig seconded to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 6/0. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED • Connie Bastyr Recording Secretary t CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 5,1999 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Callies called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: 0 Absent: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Acting Chair Callies; Commissioners Anderson, Bailey, Collins; and Planning Director Nielsen Commission Chair Borkon APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes - December 15,1998 Collins moved, Anderson seconded approving the Planning Commission Minutes of December 15, 1998, as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 1. 7:00 PUBLIC HEARING - C.U.P. FOR ACCESSORY SPACE OVER 1200 SO. FT. Applicant: Bradley and Penny Bloss Location: 5170 Howards Point Road Planning Director Nielsen reported on the property at 5170 Howards Point Road, which is zoned R1 -A, and is about 2 acres in size. This property is subject to a shoreline setback, with an existing boathouse that is presently nonconforming. Nielsen stated that the applicant wishes to add on to the existing home, making an attached garage among other changes. The total square footage would be over 3,000 square feet. Staff recommends approving of the Conditional Use Permit. Acting Chair Callies opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. Mr. Bloss presented pictures to show the lot. Commissioner Anderson pointed out that a letter was received by one of the neighbors who had no problem with the proposed changes. Mr. Sharratt, the contractor for Mr. Bloss, stated that he believes the structure will meet any standards that the neighborhood may have. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 5,1999 - PAGE 2 Commissioner Collins stated some concerns about a later owner of the property using the extended garage, space for a home business. Planning Director Nielsen stated that there is a condition in place to make this impossible. Hearing no further public testimony, Acting Chair Callies closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. Anderson moved, Bailey seconded, to approve the Conditional Use Permit with a note cautioning usage of the garage space as a small business. Motion passed 4/0. Nielsen stated that this issue will go before the City Council on January 25, 1999. STUDY SESSION 2. L -R DISTRICT - DRAFT ORDINANCE This subject was removed from the agenda, and will be ready for discussion for the Study Session on January 19th. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were none at this time. 4. REPORTS Chair Borkon has chosen not to re -apply for the Planning Commission. The City Council will be appointing new members on January 11, and will need a recommendation for a Chair and Vice Chair. Commissioner Anderson suggested waiting to appoint until there is a full Commission. Acting Chair Callies will cover the position of Chair until these decisions are made. Collins moved, Bailey seconded to approve Commissioner Callies as Chair until a full Commission is appointed. Motion passed 4/0. Commissioner Bailey then pointed out the pros and cons of moving to a seven member Planning Commission. Councilmember Chris Lizee replied that representation is the main issue, and quorum is also an issue in favor of a seven member Commission. Commissioner Bailey pointed out the meeting length is often a detriment to having a seven member Commission, but concedes that arguments in favor are very strong. Commissioner Collins wondered if the appointments were going to be geographical, to represent all locations in Shorewood. Councilmember Lizee was not sure if this is the case. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 5,1999 - PAGE 3 Commissioner Bailey then made the suggestion that the Council Liaison position be a rotation, so that all Councilmembers have an opportunity to meet and deal with the Planning Commission. Councilmember Lizee will take this suggestion to the Council. Commissioner Anderson then brought up Ron Johnson's letter. The Planning Commission directed Staff to draft a response letter, and involve the City Attorney in the sending of this letter. Planning Commission also directed Staff to send a copy of the meeting minutes to Mr. Johnson to inform him that the Planning Commission is interested in responding to his problem. The Planning Commission would also welcome an application from him on any changes he would like to make to his property. Commissioner Anderson then requested an update on the sign issue from the last meeting, and any update on the lighting issues. Planning Director Nielsen reported that the copy shop in question has been sent notice, and that • they have four illegal signs that must be addressed. Also, the mini - storage has ordered hoods for the lights, and are considering turning the lights off at some time in the night, although this has not been decided as yet. 5. ADJOURNMENT Anderson moved, Bailey seconded adjourning the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Kristine Kitzman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off -Site Secretarial, Inc. • CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY SPACE TO BRADLEY BLOSS WHEREAS, Bradley Bloss (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 5170 Howard's Point Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part hereof, and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an attached garage, the area of which, when added to the area of existing accessory space on the property, will bring the total area of accessory space on the property up to 1873 square feet; and 0 WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional use Permit for the construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission 29 December 1998, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 5 January 1999, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 25 January 1999, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the subject property is located in a R -IA/S, Single - family Residential/Shoreland zoning district and contains approximately 84,669 square feet of area. 2. That existing accessory buildings located on the property include a detached garage, a gazebo and a nonconforming boathouse structure. 3. That the total proposed accessory space (1873 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above grade of the principal structure (3047 square feet). 4. That the total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R -1A/S zoning district in which it is located (4000 square feet). -CJ 5 . That the design and materials of the proposed attached garage are consistent with the architectural character of the existing home. 6. That the proposed attached garage complies with all setback requirements for the R- lA/S zoning district. 7. That the proposed garage will bring the total amount of impervious surface on the site to only 10 percent of the total lot area, whereas the R -lA/S district allows up to 25 percent impervious surface. CONCLUSION A. That the applicant of Bradley Bloss for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth herein above be and hereby is granted. B . That this approval is subject to the following: 1. That the proposed garage will be used strictly for purposes of a residential nature. 2. That the Applicant is hereby advised that the City Code provides specific regulations relative to home occupations and any future use of the garage for other than allowable residential purposes would have to comply with such regulations. C. That the City Administrator /Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Applicant with a certified copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of January 1999. 11 Woody Love, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk -2- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that part of Lot 1, "Howards Point ", Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North and West of the following described line: Commencing at the point of intersection of the line dividing Lot 1 from Lots 2 and 3 in said addition with the shore line of Lake Minnetonka on the Westerly side of said Lot 1; thence East along said dividing line to a point therein distant 96.2 feet West of the Northeast comer of said Lot 3; thence North at a right angle 65.33 feet; thence East at a right angle 6 feet thence North 79 degrees East (assuming the South line of said Lot 1 as bearing East and West) 9.17 feet; thence North 9 degrees 40 minutes West 67 feet; thence North 72 degrees 35 minutes East 30 feet thence North 59 degrees 19 minutes East, to the shore line of Lake Minnetonka on the Easterly side of said Lot 1 and there terminating, except that part thereof lying within the South 100 feet of said Lot 1, according to the recorded plat thereof.. Exhibit A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen 29 December 1998 Bloss, Brad - C.U.P. for Accessory, Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet 405 (98.16) BACKGROUND Brad Bloss has applied for a conditional use permit to construct accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet on the property located at 5170 Howard's Point Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Mr. Bloss has plans for remodeling and adding on to the existing home on the property, part of which includes building an attached garage on the south end of the house. Since the area of the garage, when added to existing accessory structures on the site, exceeds 1200 square feet, a C.U.P. is required. • The property is zoned R -1A/S, Single- Family Residential/Shoreland and contains 84,669 square feet in area. As shown on Exhibit B the site is occupied by the applicant's home, a detached garage, a gazebo and a nonconforming boathouse near the lake. The existing garage contains 653 square feet of area. The boathouse has 320 square feet and the gazebo contains 221 square feet. The gazebo will be attached to the existing house by an addition to the north end of the house, making the gazebo an integral part of the principal dwelling rather than accessory space. The new attached garage will have 900 square feet of area, bringing the total area of accessory structures on the site to 1873 square feet. Exhibit C shows how the addition and garage will be situated on the site. The existing home contains 1712 square feet of floor area above grade, between two stories. The applicant proposes to add 893 square feet to the main floor and 440 square feet to the second floor. Combined with the existing gazebo, the total floor area above grade of the house will be'3047 square feet. Exhibit D is the proposed main level floor plan. Proposed building elevations are shown on Exhibit E. «� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum Re: Bloss CUP 29 December 1998 ANALYSIS /RECOMMENDATION Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4) of the Zoning Code prescribes criteria for granting conditional use permits for accessory space over 1200 square feet. Following is how the applicant's plans comply with the Code: a. The total area of accessory buildings (1873 square feet) does not exceed the proposed floor area (3047 square feet) above grade of the existing home. b. The total area of accessory buildings does not exceed 10 percent of the minimum lot size for the R -IA/S zoning district (.10 x 40,000 = 4000 square feet). c. The proposed garage addition complies with R -lA/S setback requirements. The applicant's plans show proposed hard cover at 10 percent, well below the maximum allowable hardcover in the Shoreland District (25 %). It is worth noting that, despite the loss of trees in last spring's storms, the house is well buffered from the two properties to the south by existing vegetation. d. Since the new garage is an integral part of the existing house and garage architectural compatibility is not considered to be an issue. Based upon the preceding analysis, it is recommended that the applicant's request for a conditional use permit be granted as proposed. cc: Jim Hurm John Dean Brad Bloss • WAN o� 0 OR d LAKE MINNETONKA G� 1. SHADY ISLAND PT 2. SHADY ISLAND TR 3. SHADY ISLAND QR 4. MAPLE LA 5. SHADY ISLAND RD S t i ll + r r r r r SHADY ISLAND o Subject, property ENCHANTED ISLAND LAKE MINNETONKA a r SPRAY ISLAND r r a r a 1 W North to,Scale LAKE MINNETONKA UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Bloss - C.U.P. CIT 1 11. 17.. 101 Alinnemnka him 551-1 MAIne 16121 174 7Q14 1 1412)- 17.13267 l BRAD BLOSS 'tk TY!T ) ..KV 1 scl 1 P"'A DR�ALII:L). Alnil 2. 19qR Sl�l): R N qk,4wf U- 19, 19911 ;Al, DTACRIMOH: drat PI-A 1".1 1. - r,.i,i lle,,,,p,n C th and W, " "(ffi' fnllon "Ir""b'd line.: di"Jin- Lm I filen, Lnl, 2 ,nd 3 -111 lifinn lilh he A— li of I,k, Kli _ he said 1 4 1: r •"! (— We', .(flrc lh."l,ess, el- 14 -1 - right nngll 61 )3 11,1: lh ... I Casa s t . n i g h, - 't.* ll-Z� i N—h 79.1eq— 17— J i I o n , 5 as . _,ohiin 1 Flit : -el Ives,) 9.17 f1l: lbcnce N,rth9 detim .10 , nn tt'n167 Peer. lb—I Nor th 72 d,v— IS eninn .10 'hence N-1 59 d,—,, 19 minmo F-,-. 1. he A.— li Of Vedy Ad of said I I and there Is" h. P t he rtyi., ohi h s_h i(m r,,, a Ilan I, =111di-it In it, ilcmde,l pl.4 1h,,e 'III II-9 and di—li o N ndsly lines o he 1'r.sl 'le"liplin". the re"C.4. l i .... I h.1 Y is ` "31 "sl , I , heic the leg,[ record, - 11 "i`h ml --ent leg., =sm fn with y-, A--nnit _ ti he—L .11A ..y —: _ 1 n f arch s, esse.e.". It- y— wish , s , I hee. sh lhe 1'. .,in. .1 e ,is,mg in,Pmrnnenrs —leensed mr ant. — -ifying nid mnmm�enn to ..... . I the p,.,,-,y. k he .h.- i.R tw. de—in., s. sekcled P ointy ..I . heneh ..k. the edge of —led men, and sdi-e-f I— Odded Inns), snd mbohtim h.,d-1,, a nd s— -ftllc kn f. ynnt (- 'he I'licn of such gnv mmrnml a q__. _ 6 . h.d cn-, 'Inle " "'I 'I--- PlsM-ld 1. lens, Pen_. fs.iji. .1, ' "nle pinn, .. yon — — , we,. — roe F.H., 11 -be "nice = .7 grnene— I th eir "'"Ie, %VI I-Pg-s that Ynn leli— he I ce.r.— "hu the .h. Ynn in".., ..d h,nif the " . —1, mrnml Wnei, .1=1v h— it"i'llictin,, "Wr yl in"j— -,in bell pp,-.1, if C... ;1�11.1.Alt;17iil " , , i ! P _-S "vr.m, mg S.."I dillIN&NI-14" 9237, s et. if W is fille in. then Jemxn 01h 1— IF — r l r l,,d 1,, :7 ., -der lo, inn m4wolin 3"d l I am . rn,,c"i I r Rinner " I" .1ne L.— "I the N's.—I [L P or ker P r A P.S. N.. 9235 i 417 1 R Rk 04 V j ( q I.- Y �n 17 1 T1 0 10 A , 11100 S -OVYOO w . s" I F "At 11PIr.w.. -)m's F, M.Mny","` Sl1w, �Af K -% z s F. WK -.1 .1 ir. FIAM.1— VIM I I - l,.6 Exhibit B EXISTING PROPERTY SURVEY GRAP111C SCALE Ix "s M:[ 1(f),1R k AE 9"33.115 /1. Jh Ul.Vl f:n Ji 1 " ,J HOUSE - 977.5 S.F. { iDIJ�iE bl�hht+FERI�lc� �P1 / = I546 `O'Ft \ / Nt GARAGE -653.4 S.F. Nu D RM, # ATWIMD G1xep.-j6 itDOAT HOUSE - 332.99.F._ Dpn69AL- FftLrr (-Pr GAZEBO - 220.8 S.f•. - el 2gao Oj u� k =2.91,1 lw/Fr SIDEWALK =457.3 S.F. SIG7�WA�U� 3lq,i� BITUMINOUS - 2,702.99.F. �RoP, P�I7UMINp,hpRN� - 4(.14.q�/Ff. +STONE WALK - 56.2 S.F.. HOUSE DECK - 72.3 S.F. *BOATHOUSE DECK - 43.3 S.F. \\ 4r FLAGSTONE WALLS - 23.6 Nil I at FLAGSTONE PLANTER - 5.6 � it TIMBERWALL(1) -62.7 S.F. �t TIMBERWALL (2) - 24.1 S.F. I �F TIMBERWALL (3) - 77.5 S.F. 1 P '1t CONCRETE APRON - 40.0 S.P. ROCK Wi72I PLASTIC -415A S.F. CONCRETE SLAB - 18.0 S.F. I I C-)J 09 CHM1100 A2-wA ;, TOTAL IWtDCOVER AREA - 6,183.SOSI )i t�I_ - - - CO_q.p:p Lgq _p�(�y a /�j- y � TOTAL LOT AREA 84,668.65 S.F. - - Y u> TOTAL HARDCOVER - 7.3 °/. - NMaJ d " iaTP.L D lFP{ip. �cVE� 9v - I7 \ t AL z I F PI `a/ i + + 4.9 i 1 �•i� nj'S f .t ,y91 9 I � S r F STONE WAUC • DEOC R CK 91 y N ,O le. i RET WALL ebb 9 0 IZ• OA p FLACCT E RET, ALL MUSE G y ti . ° ♦ o �hyM 19h POWER 1 � r /la4/ 5 FLAGSTO RET, WALL 1 I FLAGSTONE >k9� CONCRETE SLAB RET. WALL G I k PROPANE TANK 9 O C . �� O O 1 I S'Ur RAIL-Z Z� n I 1• O It r Exhibit C 5f Pr' a '! v 'L-170.00-- I PROPOSED SITE PLAN s 90 w PCT 19 I ciFlF ? �1f • AE—;40 PORCR - qj VDIST.Q& F M_^ IN =LOO;R =LAN i VA'•;'-O so/ft. T28 TO 601FL $412 Exhibit D SX3_4 CONVWXTION PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVEL r2N NErj COKSTRUC, AE)ENTION / OPTIONAL FRONT PORCH "2 J ve - r.0• ��ro DAVID M. SANDERS 24 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 Dec. 22, 1998 City of Shorewood FILE C0 c/o Planning Dept. y , r' J 1 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55931 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of property at 5205 Howard's Point • Road, directly adjacent to the property owned by Bradley and Penny Bloss at 5170 Howard's Point Road. The purpose of this letter is to state that I have no objection to your issuing the Conditional Use Permit referred to in the attached Public Hearing Not David M. Sanders • #L CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 - (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood - cityhall @shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Jim Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works / DATE: January 21, 1999 RE: Consideration of a Motion Approving Concept Plan for County Road 19 Country Club Road — Smithtown Road Intersection Over the last six months the City of Shorewood, in cooperation with Hennepin County, have discussed conceptual changes to the intersection of County Road 19 - Country Club Road — Smithtown Road intersection. In May of 1998, the City of Shorewood requested that Hennepin County perform a traffic study to determine if a signal was warranted at this intersection. Hennepin County performed an initial study and determined that indeed a signal was warranted at this intersection. The City of Shorewood has also conducted a study to evaluate the following objectives 1. Consider various alternatives for installation of a traffic signal at the subject intersection. 2. Identify funding participation with Hennepin County and Minnesota State Aid 3. Determine the amount of cut - through traffic utilizing Country Club Road, Yellowstone Trail, and Lake Linden Drive to Trunk Highway 7. Smithtown Road and Country Club Road are Municipal State Aid (MSA) routes. Simply put, tax dollars collected at the gas pump which are administered by the State of Minnesota can be utilized to reconstruct these roadways, if appropriate. Currently, the City of Shorewood maintains a balance of approximately 1.2 million of MSA dollars. The State of Minnesota has recently written a letter to the City stating that "Keeping such a high balance of unused MSA funds is undesirable since demand for State dollars for other municipalities is so high." The State has even cautioned the City to utilize the dollars, or risk losing the availability of these funds. 0* PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -)V:77 The traffic study performed, found that approximately 4,100 trips per day were occurring on Country Club Road. Of that traffic, 43 percent are vehicles cutting through residential neighborhoods to access State Highway 7. As part of one of the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan is to reduce the amount of cut through traffic utilizing Country Club Road as a short cut. Three alternatives for the subject intersection are currently under consideration. Alternative 1 proposes to install a traffic signal at the existing intersection with little geometric changes to the roadway surface. The diagrams on pages 14 A and B of the report indicate that this alternative is feasible, and is the least costly of the alternatives to construct. The estimated project costs range between $156,000 to $182,000. Of this, it is estimated that the City of Shorewood's portion of the funding would be $60,200. Municipal State Aid Dollars would be used for this amount. While this alternative is the least expensive alternative under consideration, the improvements would do little to improve the level of service to the intersection. The installation of the traffic signal may reduce the number of accidents at the intersections, however, the queuing of traffic on County Road 19 (refer to page 14B) is undesirable during peak hours of operation. In addition, this alternative does not address the cut through traffic from the subject intersection, to Trunk Highway 7. The second alternative shown on pages 15A and B involve the installation of a traffic signal with the construction of center left turn lanes on County Road 19 and Country Club Road. This alternative does improve the level of service for the intersection. The estimated project costs range between $260,000 to $325,000. Of this, it is estimated that the City of Shorewood's portion of the funding would be $82,200. Again, Municipal State Aid Dollars would be used for this amount. This alternative does improve the level of service of the intersection. However, the queue lengths on County Road 19 still back traffic up to approximately the NSP facility during peak hour events. Although this is better than Alternative 1, the configuration does little to reduce the cut through traffic issue. The third alternative involves total realignment of the intersection from a "right angle intersection" to a curve. Country Club Road would "tee" into Smithtown west of the main intersection. Smithtown would then intersect with County Road 19 (refer to pages 16 A and B). The estimated project costs range between $655,000 to $770,000. Of this, it is estimated that the City of Shorewood's portion of the funding would be $237,000. Again, Municipal State Aid Dollars would be used for this amount. This alternative improves the overall operation of the intersection and reduces the amount of cut through traffic. It is unlikely that the cut through traffic will be eliminated. However, this alternative would have the most impact on this issue. The down side of the issue involves the purchase or relocation of the Tonka Bay Liquor Store. Staff is recommending that the third alternative be approved for concept design. This alternative improves the level of service of the intersection and minimizes the amount of cut through traffic. This report and the associated cost implications will be presented in greater detail at Monday night's meeting. Staff is also recommending that dates for a public information meeting and open house be considered to gain feedback from neighboring residents. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES CONTRACT PART I - AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of January, 1999, by and between the City of Shorewood, Minnesota (the "City "), and LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. (the "Attorney "). STATEMENT OF FACTS The City has solicited proposals, conducted a series of interviews, and engaged in deliberations with respect to the selection of an attorney to serve as the City Attorney. The City has determined to select Timothy J. Keane of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., whom • desires to serve the City in that capacity. AGREEMENT 1.) Scope of Services The Attorney shall act as counsel for the City and shall perform all civil legal services required, and shall do so in a satisfactory and proper manner, as determined by the City. The services provided under this Contract shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) Act as General Counsel to the City, providing it with general legal advice, including attendance at regular City Council meetings, advising it concerning the legality of the exercise of its powers and responsibilities; advising it concerning all of its contracts, including the rendering of all necessary legal opinions, implementation and financing of capital improvement projects; reviewing, analyzing and reporting on laws, regulations, and ordinances relevant to the conduct of the City's affairs; review of ordinances and resolutions; legal advice to the City Administrator and department heads, and any and all general civil legal services. (b) Negotiate acquisition of or eminent domain proceedings regarding private property; the furnishing of title information; the preparation of land for development or redevelopment by means of street vacation, dedication, platting and replatting, comments on its activities or funding; or other legal services not provided for in Paragraph 1 (a) herein. (c) Prosecution of ordinance violations within the City; (d) Initiation or defense of civil claims involving the City; (e) Service as Bond Counsel, as and to the extent requested by the City, and provide advice with respect to all matters of government assistance and tax exempt finance; 0 1 �-,9 (f) Advice and counsel with respect to employment and personnel matters; (g) Any and all other matters for which the City desires legal counsel and services. 2.) Data to be Furnished to Attorney - The City shall furnish any necessary data which is available from its files. 3.) Personnel (a) The Attorney represents that it has, or will secure at its own expenses, all personnel required in performing the services under this Contract. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City. (b) All of the required services will be performed by the Attorney and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or permitted under State and Federal law to perform such services. (c) None of the work or services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. 4.) Time of Performance - The services of the Attorney are to commence upon the execution of this Contract and shall continue unless terminated as herein provided. 5.) Compensation (a) Monthly Retainer The Firm will provide services to include attendance at regular City Council meetings and bi- weekly staff meetings at City Hall, meetings with department heads, day -to -day requests for advice from City staff with respect to zoning, contract matters, drafting agreements or easements, and other issues on which routine legal advice is sought. The monthly retainer for the term of this agreement will be $1,750.00 per month. (b) Services not chargeable to Third Parties Proiect Financing The Attorney, in consideration for the services to be performed pursuant to Paragraph 1, shall be paid an hourly rate of compensation which shall vary depending upon the personnel of the Attorney performing the services, and shall be in accordance with the Shorewood Rate depicted on the attached Schedule A for a period of no less than one (1) year. (c) Services Billed to Others Legal services rendered on behalf of the City but for the benefit of a specific project or party which will ultimately be responsible for the costs would be billed at Standard Rates as set forth in Schedule A. These would be services rendered in connection with specific development proposals where the City bills back its costs to the developers; services rendered with respect to public improvement projects or tax increment projects for which the City pays for the costs out of a bond issue. 6.) Reimbursement of Expenses - The City shall reimburse the Attorney for expenses and disbursements in connection with legal matters handled by it, such as notary fees, court costs, FJ witness fees, recording fees, reproduction costs, facsimile transmissions, similar matters, etc., but not including its general office or overhead expense, all generally in accordance with the attached Schedule B. Reimbursement shall be made from time to time upon submission of appropriate invoices. 7.) Method of Payment - Invoices shall be submitted and payment shall be made monthly. Time entries by the Attorney shall be in sufficient detail so that services are readily discernible, and shall be internally recorded in tenth of an hour increments. Invoices shall be in a format adequate for the City to allocate expenses among general services, prosecutions, capital improvements, and litigation. 8.) Terms and Conditions - This Agreement is subject to, and includes the provisions incorporated herein, as Part II, Terms and Conditions. 9.) Other Provisions - Meeting between the Attorney's representatives and members of the staff of the City shall be held periodically in order to better coordinate and schedule the work and • services to be performed. PART II - TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1.) Termination of Contract for Cause If the Attorney fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Contract, or if the Attorney shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Contract, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to the Attorney of such termination and specify the effective date thereof, at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data studies and reports prepared by the Attorney under this Contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property and the Attorney shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and be reimbursed for its costs. is 2.) Termination at Convenience of City The City may terminate this Contract without cause any time by a thirty (30) day notice in writing from the City to the Attorney. If the Contract is terminated by the City as provided herein, the Attorney will be paid for services actually performed up to the effective date of termination and be reimbursed for its costs. 3.) Chimes - The City may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the services of the Attorney to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Attorney's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Attorney, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract. 4.) Equal Employment Opportunity - During the performance of this Contract the Attorney agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. 5.) Compliance with Laws The Attorney shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the State and Federal governments. 3. 6.) Assignability - The Attorney shall not assign any interest in this Contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation) without the prior written approval of the City. 7.) Interest of Members of City - No member of the governing body of the City, and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the carrying out of the services to which this Contract pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. 8.) Findings Confidential - All of the reports, information, data, etc..., prepared or assembled by the Attorney under this contract are confidential and the Attorney agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Attorney have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. • CITY OF SHOREWOOD LIM Mayor By: City Administrator LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. 4. [-7 C7 Hourly Rates: T. Keane P. Coyle G. Van Cleve L. Martin W. Griffith S. Wahlgren J. Steffenhagen L. Graf M. Julius, Paralegal SCHEDULE A Shorewood Rates $120.00 $110.00 $150.00 $95.00 $110.00 $70.00 $120.00 $75.00 $50.00 5. Standard Rates $215.00 $210.00 $220.00 $210.00 $210.00 $150.00 $175.00 $100.00 $110.00 0458684.01 6. SCHEDULE B REIMBURSABLE COSTS INCURRED ON BEHALF OF CLIENT Local Travel $0.30 per mile Messenger Services (In- House) $18.00 round trip to Shorewood (Outside) $26.00 round trip to Shorewood Facsimile Charges $1.00 per page, plus cost for long distance phone call, if long distance (only charged for fax LHDL would send, not incoming). Charges limited to those services described in Section 5(b) of Contract. Photocopying $0.20 per page Long Distance Phone Charges $ phone company rate Filing Fees - District Court $132.00 plus $30.00 if requesting Jury Process Services $30.00 -75.00 (approximate, depends on miles, location, how many trips to serve individual) Court Reporters $200.00 one -half day $400.00 - $600.00 full day Westlaw (Computer Research) $75.00 per hour 0458684.01 6. Shoreline Message Tuesday, January 19, 1999 Hi, I'm a resident who has their backyard that attaches to the trail. I just thought I would let you know that I was out walking this afternoon with my dogs at about 3:30 and I would say out of the 30 sleds that passed me, 50% of them were going very, very, very fast with really no regards to myself on the trail. There were two or three sleds that were in the park itself and they seem to be using it as a way to get from the trail over to Eureka Road. And there was a sled (tried to get the number off of it but I couldn't) who when I was walking on the trail did not slow down at all and was very close to me and just kept on going and they turned back to look at me. So just thought I would let you know there are the people that are abiding by the laws but I would say for today, Saturday, there are more that are not abiding by the laws. You might want to put up bigger signs. Thank you. :?* 13 Shoreline Tuesday, January 19, 1999 Hi, this is Bill Bukovec 5335 Eureka Road. My phone number at work is 545 -1401, ext. 354. I have two questions today. First question is the snowplow nicked my mailbox and totaled it backwards. I have a feeling in the spring when everything melts it is going to crash to the ground and I'm calling to see if its the homeowners responsibility for those repairs or if its the City's. Item number two is where snowmobiles are allowed to travel. Some of the snowmobiles come off of street onto the grassy part next to the street and I'm wondering if that was against the snowmobile guidelines. I would appreciate a phone call sometime tomorrow or Wednesday. Thank you Response: Talked with him 1/20199. Public Works will look at it. If we damaged we'll fix. Also offered bails of hay. He said he's using branches. If that doesn't work he'll call back. - - Jim Hurm t1►. 1� To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator J Larry Brown, City Engineer Date: January 21, 1999 Re: Plowing at the Center Mayor Love has asked for a review of the policy regarding the City Public Works crew not clearing snow from the Center parking lot. This has been the City's policy since the Center opened for several reasons. Our philosophy is that safety and conditions of the traveled roadways come first. Public Works plowing priorities are as follows: 1. streets for emergency vehicles and the general public, 2. widening and cleanup of streets, 3. cul -de -sacs and City parking areas, 4. plowing and grooming of skating rinks, and 5. clearing around sanitary lift stations and City trails. It may take as long as a full day to get to priorities 3 and 4, depending on the amount of snowfall and the time of the occurrence. Often all members of the department are out immediately after a snowfall plowing roadways to ensure that roads are cleared before traffic has an opportunity to "hard pack" the snow. Hard traffic roads left to traffic will result in icy road conditions. Certainly the Center lot can be added to the Public Works' route. There continues to be concerns however that the priorities of the Southshore Center and the City may conflict. There are various functions at the Center which require an immediate response to a snowfall event to ensure that seniors entering the Center can do so unimpeded and safely. The time lag for City personnel to clear the lot due to priorities 1 and 2 may result in unhappy customers of the Center. At the time the Center was conceived and built, a budget for snowplowing was anticipated for the Friends rather than one of the five cities that contributed to the building of the Center. This may have been largely because it was anticipated that no one city could meet the specialized timing needs of Center activities. The City wants to maintain a high level of snow removal service throughout the City. Responding to the immediate needs of the Center will impact the level of service to the traveling public. If the City Council desires to offer service to the Center, one possible approach is the Public Works Department could plow the Center lot at the time the City Hall and Badger Park lot is cleared. Other specialized needs or requests outside of this service would need to be handled by a private service contracted by the Friends. We ask for City Council guidance and policy direction. .�-ux To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Adminsitrator Date: January 21, 1999 Re: Priority Listing Analysis The priorities seem to fall into five different categories, as follows: 1 Needs to be done in 1999 • 2 High 3 Second priority 4 Third priority 5 Lowest priority f J 1. Needs to be done in 1999 Decide on alignment for Country Club Road/Smithtown intersection Consider recommendations of the Fire Department Task Force (in July) Review Comprehensive Plan, get significant public input and submission by June Complete stormwater management plan - submit with Comprehensive Plan Consider policy on placement of communication antenna facilities 2. High Priorit Implement trail planning process Develop a strategy to im rove aramedic rescue response times in much of Shorewood Land Conservation report implementation 3. Second Prioirty Define roll in affordable senior housin Undertake a three year liquor plan to improve operations Consider a ward system for Shorewood Actively pursue burying utility lines Consideration of all alternatives for transit service Re- evaluate design criteria for City streets 4. Third Priority Review water policies Consider strategies to reduce legal costs Consider a street reconstruction assessment policy (task force recommended) Up-date subdivision ordinance Revisit snowmobiles in Shorewood Implement a realistic plan to expand web page/improve communications Initiate design of Smithtown Road by considering property rights and trail issues 5. Lowest (or no) Priority Consider policy on right-of-way usage by utilities Become more involved in educating youth (and adults) in local government Consider some more organized approach for garbage collection This analysis is intended to aid in Council discussion only. Council should feel free to discuss and rearrange priorities. .fa8 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JANUARY 25, 1999 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 13, 1999 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT 24532 BROWNING FERRIS TB LIQ RECYCLING $36.35 24533 KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB. 192.30 24534 DENNIS JOHNSON WORK BOOT REIMB. 150.00 24535 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TB LIQ BUYERS CARD 20.00 24536 MN STATE TREASURER 4TH QTR BLDG PERMIT S/C 2,655.36 24537 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC PURCHASE 106.75 24538 MITCH GERSOVITCH FINAL WATER OVERPAYMENT 23.31 24539 DAHLHEIMER DIST. INC. BEER PURCHASE 1,217.40 24540 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER /MISC PURCHASE 9,469.30 24541 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. BEER /MISC PURCHASE 12,933.30 24542 MARK VII BEER /MISC PURCHASE 11,632.59 24543 24544 MARLIN'S TRUCKING NORTH STAR ICE FREIGHT MISC PURCHASE 380.00 380.54 24545 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR /WINE PURCHASE 470.62 24546 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. BEER /MISC PURCHASE 30,073.70 24547 PERA PERA 3,170.30 24548 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERRED COMP 1,085.40 24549 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 1,100.80 24550 MEDICA JANUARY HEALTH INSURANCE 6,765.78 24551 MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID 181.50 24552 BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB. 875.00 24553 BRADLEY NIELSEN LCD CABINET /MILEAGE 623.02 24554 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 4,227.21 24555 JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE 26.65 24556 ALAN ROLEK SEC 125 REIMB. 150.00 24557 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 203.91 24558 LAWRENCE NICCUM HAY BALES /HEAD LIGHTS 152.64 • 24559 BELLBOY CORP. LIQUOR /BEER PURCHASE 5,662.29 24560 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC /SUPPLY PURCHASE 158.81 24561 MIDWEST COCA -COLA MISC PURCHASE 887.48 24562 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. LIQUOR /WINE /MISC PURCHASE 8,145.32 -24563 JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO. WINE /BEER PURCHASE 1,395.10 24564 LAKE REGION VENDING MISC PURCHASE 1,412.99 24565 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 26.35 24,566 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY WINE /BEER PURCHASE 1,035.35 24567 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS LIQUOR /WINE PURCHASE 5,064.72 24568 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR /WINE PURCHASE 2,636.55 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $1.14,728.69 Page 1 V) iw r T PI-1 i 5 U ,I V I ;'J i"I 6i il T �8 LIQ 0C 'nul J i 'i rp 0 y 6 8clo, c H C i "-flo i MI i,,' l Ni" f ) C' P I LIE: PACKE VS j f-D i L Q R C i,4 f p p,:!, t-j v 2 t..)= i •V ^cJ. V.I ».^ F.�.�!;:.. _. .°''�1 ". aw i.. +! "' ?'t L "OFF— Mi iN; U .-I V I SAL T SHOW I A C*, P V if I Nj f b.i,.*J 4:,MTr..;;!� -: �'n kR K r v T 1 P : Q T HS I Of ) F , P T L I i _�E 'A' CI 'S I C-1 C 0 U HC T L 2 4 H W K I NJ '_ 1 1 A . i A - E : f F R ! " !' " ~ ! vi T C NTA E: R P TA L UN i VIRM 2 4 F ESOUR A/P & JP/R C I.ECK`_i` T f,4 6 H C I q A A, R i CI ,, .I C. 1 ""i r, i, r - ,c: -PARK - ,PI ANNING z R. K S •-, ~ SER _ 8 1, KEiNNEDY C-Ef ' UENEF A.L I EGA! PROP 2 3c"I c �ZR IC Ip R Of J a;CT 3 y, I C) T A . Q L r 'w +]; .-'CEINNEDY & G-�Q1.6VEN "4;:z O . 24582 LK MTKA CO.NSEPV_ DISFRICT 1S Q-TIR LE"IN PAVIMIENT c a U. N C1 L 4,233.82 - 2 A v K E R �z E.. i :z, --, v - r 21 LEGAL EjN i n, v - r � 5 fI, ,,- r -, ?' . 1 13 q ri E TR D 'S,':_ L .=3 .1 NC DUPLICATOR ,.t I AGREE r' U N S U,, - . T i E�.,V T f.',J 'IME', E S E"A" E R EZ z�� a: l-j 24 S) S C I I U E P Cj 'i Ii" I I' Supp; Pag6 2 U tj J i A t i � : U "J s, 1"! 1 NH. i f Z� t N C ! !-!. ' i r, --.. I j 'R E E* rs, tv cz k" i C K Y- i, i 'Y � `:: I ;ti'.« "; i .. .: ! .nl E-'',!?'f l_ !... .'.i'.'. :.. 'A' TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 226,844.12 Page 3 PAYROLL REGISTER :7 Check # Pay Date Emp ID Employee Name Chk Amount 214045 1/19/99 100 ALMICH, RYAN D 36.01 214046 1/19/99 110 BASTYR, CONNIE D 458.57 214047 1/19/99 115 BROWN, LAWRENCE A 1620.85 214048 1/19/99 140 BETTS, GRAYDON D 184.75 214049 1/19/99 223 BUHL, SUSAN E 329.23 214050 1/19/99 325 COLE, ANGELA M 664.99 214051 1/19/99 500 DAVIS, CHARLES S 1115.38 214052 1/19/99 550 DAVIS, KELLEN C 149.44 214053 1/19/99 780 EDRALIN, LAURENCE A 132.41 214054 1/19/99 790 ERDMAN, JOE H 164.42 214055 1/19/99 1100 GARFUNKEL, JOHN J 184.70 214056 1/19/99 1160 GROUT, TWILA R 698.48 214057 1/19/99 1190 HEBERT, KATHLEEN A 529.00 214058 1/19/99 1400 HELGESEN, PATRICIA R 571.12 214059 1/19/99 1410 HELLING, PAMELA J 586.19 214060 1/19/99 1450 HEURKINS, MARK K 119.88 214061 1/19/99 1550 HURM, JAMES C 1805.64 214062 1/19/99 1601 JAKEL, BRIAN D 282.32 214063 1/19/99 1700 JENSEN, JEFFREY A 1188.44 214064 1/19/99 1800 JOHNSON, DENNIS D 954.36 214065 1/19/99 1840 JOHNSON, PAUL H 141.07 214066 1/19/99 1999 JOSEPHSON, KELLY F 89.47 214067 1/19/99 2100 JOSEPHSON, WILLIAM F 629.86 214068 1/19/99 2270 KOPISCHKE, JOHN T 246.12 214069 1/19/99 2495 LATTERNER, MOLLY D 299.49 214070 1/19/99 2500 LATTERNER, SUSAN M 664.99 214071 1/19/99 2600 LIZEE, CHRISTINE G 184.70 214072 1/19/99 2770 LOVE, CLIFFORD W 219.24 214073 1/19/99 2800 LUGOWSKI, JOSEPH P 956.92 214074 1/19/99 2805 LUND, JASON R 253.90 214075 1/19/99 2900 MARRON, RUSSELL R 40.10 214076 1/19/99 2910 MASON, BRADLEY J 821.85 214077 1/19/99 2938 MCDONALD, DANIEL J 102.35 214078 1/19/99 3000 NAAB, THERESA L 647.88 214079 1/19/99 3100 NICCUM, LAWRENCE A 1182.83 214080 1/19/99 3400 NIELSEN, BRADLEY J 948.03 214081 1/19/99 3433 OLSEN, MAX R 149.61 214082 1/19/99 3500 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH P 1165.28 214083 1/19/99 3580 POUNDER, CHRISTOPHER J 1204.90 214084 1/19/99 3600 RANDALL, DANIEL J 1195.12 214085 1/19/99 3650 REINSTRA, BRIAN C 30.42 214086 1/19/99 3710 ROGERS, DONALD J 167.43 214087 1/19/99 3800 ROLEK, ALAN J 1204.74 214088 1/19/99 3820 RUTLEDGE, PATRICK D 123.92 214089 1/19/99 3825 SAYER, JOHN E 198.76 214090 1/19/99 3900 SCHMID, CHRISTOPHER E 483.49 214091 1/19/99 3910 SCHMID, R. CONRAD 50.10 214092 1/19/99 4400 STELLMAKER, NANCY K 59.27 214093 1/19/99 4500 STOVER, KRISTI 184.70 214094 1/19/99 4600 THURSTON, DEBRA J 275.98 214095 1/19/99 5000 ZERBY, SCOTT 184.70 Total Regular Checks: Total Manual Checks: Total Checks: 25883.40 0.00 25883.40 Page 4 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL I LAKE LINDEN DRIVE ® AM January 11, 1999 A 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard WSB Minneapolis, MN 55426 612 -541 -4800 & Associates, Inc. FAX 541 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS WSB Project No. 1120.00 from CSAH 19 to Trunk Highway 7 TRAFFIC STUDY COUNTRY CLUB ROAD / YELLOWSTONE TRAIL / LAKE LINDEN DRIVE FROM CSAH 19 TO TH 7 in The City of Shorewood Hennepin County, Minnesota January 11, 1999 Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office Park 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 -1344 , 1 (612) 541 -4800 J 1999 I Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study Title City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: January 11, 1999 Reg. No. 26082 Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Certification Charles T. Rickart, P.E. TABLE OF CONTENTS ' TITLE SHEET CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Pie I. INTRODUCTION ........................ ..............................1 ' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................ ............................... 3 III. ALTERNATIVES ...................... ............................... 12 IV. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ............ ............................... 19 I V. SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION .............. ............................... 26 VI. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 28 APPENDIX .................................... .............................30 LIST OF FIGURES ' Figure 1 - Project Location .:.:..:............... ............................... 2 Figure 2 - Existing (1997) Peak Hour Volumes ...... ............................... 7 Figure 3 - Average Daily Traffic Volumes .......... ............................... 8 ' Figure 4 - Existing Lane Configuration (Alternate 1) .............................. 14 Figure 5 - Alternate 2 Lane Configuration ........ ............................... 15 ' Figure 6 - Alternate 3 Lane Configuration .......................... 16 Figure 7 - 1997 Peak Hour Volumes (Alternate 2) .. . .......... . 21 Figure 8 - 1997 Peak Hour Volumes (Alternate 3) .. ............................... 22 ' Figure 9 - 2017 Peak Hour Volumes (Alternate 2) ...... 23 ........... . .... Figure 10 - 2017 Peak Hour Volumes (Alternate -3) . . ......... . 24 ' LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - O -D Study Summary ................... ............................... 9 Table 2 = Crash Investigation ........::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::: : ::::::::::::: 10 Table 3 Level of Service Descriptions 11 Table 4 - Estimated Cost Summary ............................................. 17 ' Table 5 - Estimated Cost Breakdown ............................................ 18 .Table 6 Level of Service Summary 25 Table 7 - Signal Warrant Analysis ............... ............................... 27 ' Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood TOC ' WSB Project No. 1120.00 1 t Country Club Road / Yellowstone Trail / Lake Linden Drive ' from CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study I. INTRODUCTION ' The City of Shorewood, located in southern Hennepin County, is a community of approximately 6,500 residents. Current traffic patterns indicate that there has been a substantial growth in commuter traffic through and from the City. This includes growth of ' 2% to 3% per year on city and Hennepin County roadways. The Country Club Road/Yellowstone Trail/Lake Linden Drive corridor from County State t Aid Highway (CSAH) 19 to TH 7 has been a concern of the City for many years with respect to cut through traffic. In addition, the geometrics and operations of the CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road/Country Club Road intersection has been an issue with Hennepin County. ' This intersection provides access through Shorewood from Tonka Bay and Excelsior. Figure 1 illustrates the corridor and intersection location. As a result of these concerns, the ' City commissioned WSB & Associates to prepare a traffic study of the intersection and corridor. ' The purpose of the traffic study, which is documented in this report, was to determine the amount of cut - through traffic on Country Club Road/Yellowstone Trail/Lake Linden Drive, evaluate the operational characteristics of CSAH 19 at the Smithtown Road/ Country Club ' Road intersection including analysis of alternatives for traffic flow and safety in the intersection, determine traffic signal justification, and develop conclusions and recommendations for improvements. 1 rl Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Page 1 WEST TONKAi / P, POINT I Echo Bay \ a CIR c I 30. FAIRHOPE AVE. � C \ 1 19 �� DR 31. WEST POINT PL. 1990 POP, 1 w " z 32. WOODPECKER RIDGE RD. S < 3 z o 33. MAPLE HILL AVE. O� K q� o Q 34. GLADE AVE. CLIFF \,AKF� Q �Q o o I LL �G it �� City o > �A, QD cR F Sunrise / WIL DHURST Hall ?I °Q r� AV E• Point Q RD. I _ / / g�vFF w a a I Gideon Bay 37. AREY LA. ly�U F Uro L 5b w I ` 38. LINDEN ST. WOO DLAWN AVE. 7ASANT PL. 39. ELM PL. J J (4 z °G�� Duck Frog 40. LAFAYETTE ST. a� >_z� Island Island J w • �A �• aco_a�! ��o � 9F�I Excelsior WEDGEWOOD DR. P ° o FENCE 11 Q �p�� o P S Bay T o 0 � AMLEE RD. 9 HEN WOOD AVE. 4 0Y , GLEN RD, z p V o 8F L 4° �� v y p ST J �SZOF o a Q CE ° w <4 NK °JST DING Q STAR CIR. a 9 �/ DR D • BEN P E � ST doA< P 82 v o a RD• S T P Mud ^�o� Q � R v� cR SMITVA C t y R <4 GLOVE OE O. ti 4ry�oC� La C 19 ee J Holl VA.ER MCLAIN �/ v= S 4vEL£GE V rd PEE ELD c I 3 0 L Y4 P 9 IDLE project Location w �9 s y 1 s o Galpin Lake ' a 'Lake o � PARK ST. Y C7 TI \ T 1 1 7 N o> �O � BR/ LLJ s �� a Lake R23W w ��Q tiZ GALPIN LA. r > Q J Linden 34 _ 4 ti Q g 4 3 q y �� MURRAY ST. Q /TI 16N F LOy i .�/ P /Y U O WILTS �Q j\ AVE. U EY LA. JI��J GNP S OMMI� RD • >a OEpOF ti RO' a i N W7 D. ORCHARD �A= w MVP m \ K EHNEN a KOE NEN R. BAY CIR. E. CRE P SOMMER GATE CIR. W. �T OAS a 64TH 4 G� �O° z 7 r 81. 82. Li RD, JQ � P a d� AVE. �D ST. Oy�STELLCIR. 63rd s 1e�� o o u a o , �DY HILL ST. = 4gF 94. ANT DR. X96 J J O �. J CM LA. S AND P r o °o o OQ o v 0 Uj RIDGE a p _ 84. o a o 83.A PIPER LP• W. 65th SL o ?� 350 Westwood Lak Office Traffic Study WSB Project No. 1120.00 Oct ober 6, 1998 WSB 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55428 Country Club Road /Yellowstone Trail /Lake Linden Drive Project Location 612541 from CSAH 19 to Trunk Highway 7 �As"ciarosIm. FAX 541 .1 no Figure 1 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS City of Shorewood, Hennepin County ' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Land Use The existing land use adjacent to the corridor between CSAH 19 and TH 7 is primarily ' residential. At the intersection of CSAH 19, the land use primarily consists of commercial uses including the following: ' • Northwest Quadrant: A gas station/convenience store, with the American Legion Hall directly behind it on Smithtown Road. • Northeast Quadrant: The Tonka Bay Liquor Store, with the Smithtown Crossings ' Shopping Center directly behind it on CSAH 19. • Southeast Quadrant: The Amoco /Oasis Market gas convenience store. • Southwest Quadrant: The Minnetonka Country Club Golf Course. Commercial uses exist adjacent to the intersection. Residential uses are present as you travel from the intersection in all directions. Roadway Characteristics ' CSAH 19: CSAH 19 is the north and east legs of the intersection. This roadway is a County State Aid Highway and is considered a collector street on the County's transportation system. The roadway approaching the ' intersection has the following characteristics: • Through Lanes: Two 12 foot (1 in each direction). ' • Turn Lanes: No turn lanes southbound, right turn lane westbound. • Shoulders: Paved 6' to 8' in width. • Cross - section: Rural with ditches and some bituminous curb. • Speed: 35 miles per hour (mph) Smithtown Road: This existing roadway is an east/west City Municipal State Aid street with the following characteristics: ' • Through Lanes: Two 12 foot (one in each direction). • Turn Lanes: No turn lanes. ' • Shoulders: No shoulders. • Cross- section: Rural with ditches and some bituminous curb. • Speed: 30 mph ' Country Club Road: This roadway is a north/south City Municipal State Aid street with the following characteristics: • Through Lanes: Two 12 foot (one in each direction). Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1110.00 Page 3 • Turn Lanes: No turn lanes. • Shoulders: No shoulders. 0 Cross - section: Rural with ditches and some bituminous curb. • Speed: 30 mph. Yellowstone Trail: This roadway is a east/west City Municipal State Aid street with the following characteristics: • Through Lanes: Two 12 foot (one in each direction). • Turn Lanes: No turn lanes. • Shoulders: No shoulders. • Cross - Section: Road with ditching. • Speed: 30 mph. Lake Linden Drive: This roadway is a north/south City Municipal State Aid street with the following characteristics: ' • Through Lanes: Two 12 foot (one in each direction). • Turn Lanes: No turn lanes. 0 Shoulders: No shoulders. • Cross- Section: Road with ditching. • Speed: 30 mph. ' Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was obtained from the City of Shorewood and Hennepin County. Sixteen hour turning movement counts were conducted by Hennepin County on June 10, 1997 from 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM and June 12, 1997 from 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Figure 2 ' illustrates the existing 1997 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The average daily traffic (ADT) volume information was collected from Hennepin County count stations located on CSAH 19, north of the intersection and east of the intersection for 1997 and from counts conducted by the City on Yellowstone Trail in 1997. Figure 3 illustrates the existing and projected average daily traffic. ' A review of the traffic volume data indicates that of the traffic on CSAH 19, approximately 22% in the AM peak hour and 23% in the PM peak hour is turning onto Smithtown Road or Country Club Road. The majority of the traffic is turning left and right following CSAH 19. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Page 4 Origin - Destination Analysis An Origin- Destination (O -D) study was conducted on Tuesday October 27,1998 from 6 AM to 7 PM for traffic on Country Club Road, Yellowstone Trail and Lake Linden Drive between CSAH 19 and TH 7. The O -D study consists of collecting license plate and vehicle ' data at three (3) locations along the roadway. License plates were then matched between the 3 count stations to determine the number of vehicles cutting through between CSAH 19 and TH 7. The results of the O -D study concluded that of the 2046 vehicles counted on Country ' Club Road northbound and southbound at CSAH 19, 870 of them traveled through these roadways to get to TH 7. This represents approximately 43% of the traffic on Country Club Road. The heaviest concentration of the "cut- through" traffic was during the PM peak hours. The majority of the traffic was using Country Club Road Lake Linden Drive. Table 1 illustrates the results of the O -D Study. Based on observations at TH 7 and review of the TH 41 /TH 7 intersection count volume data, approximately 45% of the traffic on Lake Linden Drive is destined to or from TH 41. Therefore, it is estimated that approximately 480 vehicles are cut - through from CSAH 19 to TH 7. This represents 24% of the traffic on Country Club Road. Crash Investigation Crash data was collected from Hennepin County for crashes occurring at the intersection of CSAH 19 and Smithtown Road/Country Club Road. The data indicates that a total of 24 crashes occurred in the intersection between January 1994 and December 1997. The primary type of crash occurring in the intersection were right angle crashes, left turns into oncoming traffic and rear end crashes. The results of this data are summarized in Table 2. The analysis of this data concludes that the four year average intersection crash rate (number of crashes per million vehicle miles traveled) is 1.06 compared to a county -wide average of .70. The intersection severity rate, which is 'a measure of the severity of the accidents over the million vehicle miles traveled, was to 2.25 compared to county -wide average of 1.32. It can concluded from this data that this intersection has an overall safety concern with respect to crashes. Existing Traffic Capacity Utilizing the existing traffic volumes, roadway configurations and traffic control, an analysis of the existing level of service (LOS) and capacity was conducted for the intersection of CSAH 19 at Country Club Road. The analysis was performed using the FHWA Highway Capacity software (HCS), which simulates capacity analysis techniques as described in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. The capacity of analysis worksheets are included in the appendix. The ability of a roadway system to accommodate traffic volumes is expressed in terms of levels of service (LOS). The LOS of an intersection is based on approach delay, amount of Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Page S time a driver must wait at an intersection before proceeding. Intersections are graded A -F with A representing the least delay and F representing the greatest delay. In urbanized areas, 1 such as Shorewood, a LOS D is typically acceptable during the AM or PM peak hours, although a LOS C is desirable. A brief description of LOS is provided in Table 3. These LOS measures are standards set forth by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. The results of the analysis indicate that the intersection is currently operating at a level of ' service C in the AM peak hour and F in the PM peak hour. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Page 6 X O --mom ONQ1 IA r r/1 NBC K — 292 (7421 36 (1321 .11 7. Smithtown Road (551 45 "Ste 1136) 78 1511 31 +NGo GaW01 O �N U O U Legend jr Lane Configuration XX -AM PM 350 Westwood Lake Office Traffic Stud )' MB �i� No. 1120.00 Date: Odober 27, 1998 - WSB 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55428 Country Club Rd/Yellowstone Tr/Lake Lindon Dr Existing (1997) 612- W-4800 From: CSAH 19 to TH 7 Peak Hour Volumes & Assoctoarr, Inc. FAX 641 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS I City of Shorewood, Hennepin County Figure 2 t:.1120.00.oad.um1adt.dgn Page 7 X ° o ° o 0 0 � N 14,200 Smithtown Road (18,000) 4,600 b tx U s~ 0 U 2,600 1,300 Yellowstone Trail .? s~ A 0 0 b c a� Existing (1997) ADT = XXX a Projected (2020) ADT = (XXX) - 350 Westwood Lake Office Traffic Study WSB Project No. 1120.00 Date: October 27,1998 WSB 84 Wayzata Boulevard Mi nneapolis, MN 55428 Country Club Rd/Yellowstone Tr/Lake Lindon Dr Average Daily Traffic Volumes 612-54148M From: CSAH 19 to TH 7 do Associates, Inc. FAX 541 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS I C o f S Hennep County Figure 3 t:v2o.o0 \Coaf oat,OOn Page 8 TABLE 1 Country Club RdNellowstone Tr /Lake Lindon Dr From: CSAH 19 to TH 7 Origin- Destination Study 6:00 A.M. -10:00 A.M. From Dir Country Club Rd SB Lake Linden Rd NB Country Club Rd SB Yellowstone Tr EB 11:00 A.M. - 2:00 P.M. From Dir Country Club Rd SB Lake Linden Rd NB Country Club Rd SB Yellowstone Tr EB 3:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M. From Dir Country Club Rd SB Lake Linden Rd NB Country Club Rd SB Yellowstone Tr EB Total Cars To Lake Linden Rd Dir SB Total Cars Cut -Thru Cars 84 NO 20.1 417 375 128 Country Club Rd NB 245 22 9.0 417 Yellowstone Tr WB 35 6 1.4 13 Country Club Rd NB 245 0 0 Total Cars To Lake Linden Rd Dir SB Total Cars Cut -Thru Cars 38 19.4 196 101 114 Country Club Rd NB 183 71 38.8 196 Yellowstone Tr WB 36 9 4.6 10 Country Club Rd NB 183 4 2.2 Total Cars To Lake Linden Rd Dir SB Total Cars Cut -Thru Cars 263 56.2 468 456 567 Country Club Rd NB 537 351 65.4 468 Yellowstone Tr WB 89 21 4.5 18 Country Club Rd NB 537 1 0.2 Page 9 TABLE 2 CSAH 19 AT SMITHTOWN ROAD / COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CRASH INVESTIGATION CITY OF SHOREWOOD INTERSECTION 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL PI I PD PI PD PI PD PI PD PI PD CSAH 19 at Smithtown Rd/Country Club Rd 3 2 2 6 3 4 1 3 9 15 TOTAL CRASHES 3 2 2 6 3 4 1 3 9 15 5 8 7 4 24 CRASH RATE 0.93 1.49 1.16 0.66 1.06 SEVERITY RATE 2.61 2.61 2.64 1.16 2.25 PI = Personnel Injury Crash PD = Property Damage Crash Two -Way Stop: Crash Rate County Average = 0.70 Severity Rate County Average = 1.32 1 crash inv 11/2/98 Page 10 TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION A FREE FLOW: speed controlled by driver's desires, speed limits, or physical roadway conditions. B STABLE FLOW: operating speeds beginning to be restricted, little or no restriction on maneuverability from other vehicles. C STABLE FLOW: speeds and maneuverability more restricted. D APPROACHING UNSTABLE FLOW: tolerable speeds can be maintained but temporary restrictions to flow cause substantial drops in speed, little freedom to maneuver, comfort and convenience are low. E UNSTABLE FLOW: volumes near capacity, speed typically in neighborhood of 30 MPH, stoppages of momentary duration, ability to maneuver severely limited. F FORCED FLOW: low- operating speeds, volume below capacity, queues formed. Page 11 III. ALTERNATIVES ' The primary concern at the intersection of CSAH 19 and Smithtown Road/Country Club Road is the safety of vehicles and pedestrians, as well as the amount of cut through traffic between CSAH 19 and TH 7 along Country Club Road. Currently, this movement from southbound CSAH 19 to Country Club Road is not controlled and therefore a very easy movement to make, even though the traffic volumes do not indicate that this is a very significant movement in the intersection, thr, amount of cut - through traffic is significant. In order to address these concerns, three alternatives were selected for analysis. Each is discussed below: • Alternative 1: Existing Geometrics with a Traffic Signal System This alternative would add a traffic control signal system at the intersection while maintaining the existing geometrics and lane configurations. This would be the least costly of the alternatives. However, it provides the least benefit to the operations of the intersection. The estimated cost for this alternative would be $156,000 to $182,000. Figure 4 illustrates the existing lane configuration with the proposed signal system. • Alternative 2: Southbound Left Turn Lane with a Traffic Signal System This alternative would help delineate the CSAH 19 movements by providing for a left turn lane from southbound CSAH 19 to eastbound CSAH 19. This would require a widening of the intersection to accommodate the new turn lane. The traffic control signal system would then provide phasing alternatives for the left turn movements on CSAH 19. This alternative would not require right -of -way acquisition. The estimated cost for this alternative would range from $260,000 to $325,000. Figure 5 illustrates the proposed alternative 2 lane configuration. • Alternative 3: Intersection Realignment with a Traffic Signal System This alternative would realign the intersection making CSAH 19 the continuous through street and teeing Smithtown Road into CSAH 19. Country Club Road would tee into Smithtown Road. No right turn on red would be posted for southbound CSAH 19 to Smithtown Road. This alternative would require taking of significant right -of -way to accommodate the roadway realignment. This alternative provides for the safest condition as well as the best traffic operation of all the alternatives. This alternative would discourage the cut - through traffic to and from TH 7. The estimated cost for this alternative would range from $655,000 to $770,000. Figure 6 illustrates the proposed Alternative 3 realignment. A breakdown of costs for each Alternative is outlined in Table 4. These costs are preliminary and do not take into account any contaminated soils remediation, if required, or additional storm sewer over what would normally be provided with projects such as this. The cost analysis found that approximately 90% of the total roadway construction cost would be paid for by Hennepin County based on their cost Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood Page 12 WSB Project No. 1120.00 participation policy. The traffic signal system will be paid for 67% County, 33% City. The right -of -way cost will be paid for 50% County, 50% City. It was assumed that the County would pay 20% for legal, administrative and engineering costs. Table 5 outlines this cost breakdown by agency. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood WSB Project No. 1120.00 Page 13 Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road / Country Club Road Existing Lane Configuration with Alternative I d 0 U CITY OF TONKA BAY Smithtown Crossing I Imoco z f- u � Floors Plus --------------- --- TotalGas American !Stat-on Legion 7 fi t A l d 0 U CITY OF TONKA BAY Smithtown Crossing I Imoco u � 0 ly 0 t January 1999 356 VVSSWMW Laks Offim A 8"1 %%'WW 8WW'so WSB h1hrmpoib, NN 55426 812-5414NO I NFRASTRUCTURE Ci of Shorewood Hennepin County, Minnesota - EN &A—JtW�h. .1700 t y GINEERS - F P A L X A S N 4i NERS X 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET —minric-tonka C.unty-C16- Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road / Country Club Road Alternative 1 - Queue Lengths '�' - _-� v � ��\ ` �, ° ,, , ter n — '��•��' �� _ ? 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET J q l� ''...,- � .., / F - �, n .' i �, V ��;, T t ,, f r ° y � � <� � t � b ! � � J • o '�. 1 �. f E - - - ' - I c, r 4 � .. • 1 r �r y t y . � S, f YL IX 4 . i tt _ S . 3 e d 171 nd G L engths AM �- i `� r I + ��. � � 20 Intersection Queue 5 � A i - 4 -7- T „r ` PM January 1999 City of Shorewood,, Hennepin County, Minnesota 950 Wi66v00d LeW 01606 844, W6yz616 BOUWYWd W V VL / Y IMinneep011e, NN 55428 612447666 & An.*,� h. FAX5414700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road / Country Club Road Alternative 2 Z 50 25 0 50 100 CITY OF SCALE IN FEET TONKA BAY January 1999 I City of Shorewood, Tonk, B B C ounty, Minnesota A W ftsinvo Lake Or" 8"1 "%)"W Boulevard WSB Minresob, NN 55M 812-541-4M A—dw-h. FAX 5414700 I NFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Liquor Smithtown Cross* 4 F loors 1 '3 Plus -- --- J J _J rotal�Gas American !Stat�oif Legi n � ) ad SIDI 7 � F I H ---- ------ it k- Pro sed Signal C - ------ 31 Amoco 1 cc ---------- e , 4- January 1999 I City of Shorewood, Tonk, B B C ounty, Minnesota A W ftsinvo Lake Or" 8"1 "%)"W Boulevard WSB Minresob, NN 55M 812-541-4M A—dw-h. FAX 5414700 I NFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Liquor 4 AV, Wt k- Pro sed Signal C - ------ 31 Amoco 1 cc ---------- e , 4- - ------------- - Minnetonka County Club---� January 1999 I City of Shorewood, He nnepin C ounty, Minnesota A W ftsinvo Lake Or" 8"1 "%)"W Boulevard WSB Minresob, NN 55M 812-541-4M A—dw-h. FAX 5414700 I NFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - ------------- - Minnetonka County Club---� Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road /Country Club Road Alternative 2 -Queue Lengths D1 + " L Y 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Legend 2017 Intersection Queue Lengths AM PM January 1999 = WaSWOW Uka OffiN Ci Si WSB Mh"Wdb, KIN 55425 812-341 of Shorewood Hennepin County Minnesota &A—,"ml— FAX3414700 NFRAS t y INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road / Country Club Road Alternative 3 UW - 4 4 -1 - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 0 Floors' �) Plus Total Gas ',Amerman Station ( � Legion CITY OF TONIKA BAY Smithtown -300' R Crossing a Bay L 1 9 r o 250'R 200'R 4D - -.4 -r Pro gnal;,,Sys'O'm s ed Si I : P ) Hennepin County, Minnesota A WSB Amoco Ci t y of Shorewood J�� NFRASTRUCTURE 812454148m FAX 5414700 - ENONEERS PL4NNERS d C3 C3 ------ C5 4D - -.4 -r Pro gnal;,,Sys'O'm s ed Si I : P ) j , ra 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET r j! 0 Cs r — 1W 0- I V January 1999 Hennepin County, Minnesota A WSB Amoco Ci t y of Shorewood J�� NFRASTRUCTURE 812454148m FAX 5414700 - ENONEERS PL4NNERS C5 6 j , ra 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET r j! 0 Cs r — 1W 0- I V January 1999 Hennepin County, Minnesota A WSB 8"1 wa eoulmwd MinraoW19, MN 55426 Ci t y of Shorewood J�� NFRASTRUCTURE 812454148m FAX 5414700 - ENONEERS PL4NNERS Traffic Study CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road /Country Club Road X Alternative 3 -Queue Lengths > -l. a, S�I _ • s s ' y Floors - Plus 7 Y rot4l Gas Station -- (American Legion I Row f _ - J 1 Z1 , ,1_ ________ �r. r J Minnetonka I� County - CWb -- -- 1 f i I) - N _ % p osed Si as =,Sy TOP ` , -- Amoco I 1� � t '� f i� , _ U• r 1 f i � _�`a ✓ > t , i Y f'Y f- 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET � I F t � 1 i 2) i , � � S f Legend 2017 Intersection Queue Lengths AM >r PM � ..s..r. January 1999 City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota 960 yNBlhv00tl LAM Off" 8441 Wayzata Soulawd WS Y Nine olb, NN 55426 L7 0/2464M4w0 & A—b" I- FAX3414700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Smithtown 300'R Crossing o a Bay L or 250'R 200'R i i r � , f'Y f- 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET � I F t � 1 i 2) i , � � S f Legend 2017 Intersection Queue Lengths AM >r PM � ..s..r. January 1999 City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota 960 yNBlhv00tl LAM Off" 8441 Wayzata Soulawd WS Y Nine olb, NN 55426 L7 0/2464M4w0 & A—b" I- FAX3414700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Smithtown 300'R Crossing o a Bay L or 250'R 200'R TABLE 4 CSAH 19 AT SMITHTOWN ROAD / COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COST SUMMARY CITY OF SHOREWOOD ALTERNATIVE 1 - Existing Geometrics with Traffic Signal System Estimated Range in Cost Estimated Construction Cost $ 120,000.00 to $ 140,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 36,000.00 to $ 42,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ - to $ - TOTAL COST $ 156,000.00 to $ 182,000.00 ALTERNATIVE 2 - Southbound Left Turn Lane with Traffic Signal System Estimated Range in Cost Estimated Construction Cost $ 200,000.00 to $ 250,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 60,000.00 to $ 75,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ - to $ - TOTAL COST $ 260,000.00 to $ 325,000.00 ALTERNATIVE 3 - Intersection Realignment with Traffic Signal System Note: The Estimated Costs assume the following: 1. No additional costs for contaminated soils remediation. 2. No oversizing of storm sewer to accommodate adjacent developments. Page 17 Estimated Range in Cost Estimated Construction Cost $ 350,000.00 to $ 400,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 105,000.00 to $ 120,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ 200,000.00 to $ 250,000.00 TOTAL COST $ 655,000.00 to $ 770,000.00 Note: The Estimated Costs assume the following: 1. No additional costs for contaminated soils remediation. 2. No oversizing of storm sewer to accommodate adjacent developments. Page 17 TABLE 5 CSAH 19 AT SMITHTOWN ROAD / COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COST BREAKDOWN CITY OF SHOREWOOD ALT ERNATIVE 1 - Existing Geometrics with Traffic Signal System A LTERNATIVE 2 - Southbound Left Turn Lane with Traffic Signal System COUNTY MSA TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $ 93,800.00 $ 46,200.00 $ 140,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 28,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 42,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ - $ - $ - TOTAL COST $ 121,800.00 $ 60,200.00 $ 182,000.00 A LTERNATIVE 2 - Southbound Left Turn Lane with Traffic Signal System ALTERNATIVE 3 - Intersection Realignment with Traffic Signal System COUNTY MSA TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $ 192,800.00 $ 57,200.00 $ 250,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 75,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ - $ - $ - TOTAL COST $ 242,800.00 $ 82,200.00 $ 325,000.00 ALTERNATIVE 3 - Intersection Realignment with Traffic Signal System Page 18 COUNTY MSA TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $ 327,800.00 $ 72,200.00 $ 400,000.00 Legal, Administrative, Engineering and Finance Costs (30 %) $ 80,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 120,000.00 Right of Way Costs $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 250,000.00 TOTAL COST $ 532,800.00 $ 237,200.00 $ 770,000.00 Page 18 ' IV. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS t The alternatives discussed in the previous sections were analyzed utilizing the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and projected 2017 peak hour volumes. The 2017 volumes were ' determined based on a 1.4% per year growth. Figures 7, 8, 9 and 10 illustrate Alternatives 2 and 3 traffic volumes, respectively. Analysis was performed using the FHWA Highway Capacity Software (HCS), which simulates capacity analysis techniques as described in the 1994 Highway ' Capacity Manual. The results of the analysis for each alternative is discussed below and shown in Table 6. The capacity analysis worksheets and queue length calculations are included in the ' appendix. • Alternative 1: Existing Geometries with a Traffic Signal System ' The results of this analysis indicates that the existing (1997) overall level of service would not change from the existing LOS C in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The southbound left turn would still be operating at LOS D in the AM peak hour ' and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The proj ected 2017 volumes indicate that the overall LOS would be F in the AM and PM peak hours. ' A queue length analysis was conducted to determine the number of vehicles that would back up as a result of the traffic signal installation. The queue length analysis concluded that in 1997 for southbound traffic, a 354 -foot backup oftraffic would occur in the AM ' peak hour and a 1004 -foot backup of traffic would occur in the PM peak hour. In 2017, the queue length required would be 1,280 feet in the AM peak hour and 1,161 feet in the ' PM peak hour. The level of service and queue length analysis indicates that southbound traffic will be ' waiting through more than one signal cycle with delays of 1 % minutes to 3 minutes per vehicle. ' • Alternative 2: Southbound Left Turn Lane with a Traffic Signal System By providing the left turn lane for southbound CSAH 19 traffic, the overall intersection ' LOS would remain at a LOS C in the AM peak hour and would decrease to a F in the PM peak hour. The southbound left turn LOS would also remain the same as Alternative 1 with PM peak hour of LOS F. The 2017 volumes indicate that the overall LOS would ' be a D in the AM peak hour and an F in the PM peak hour. A queue length analysis was conducted as part of this alternative analysis and it was found t that a storage length of 310 feet would be required in the AM peak hour and 297 feet southbound left turn in the PM peak hour. The 2017 storage lengths required would be ' 999 feet in the AM peak hour and 956 feet in the PM peak hour Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Shorewood Page 19 WSB Project No. 1120.00 1� L 0 n The level of service and queue length analysis indicates that southbound traffic will be waiting through more than one signal cycle with delays of 1 %Z minutes to 3 minutes per vehicle. • Alternative 3: Intersection Realignment with a Traffic Signal System The realignment of this intersection, along with providing a tee intersection with only one approach, the overall intersection LOS would increase to a LOS B in the AM and PM peak hour. The northbound PM peak left -turn movement would be at a LOS C and all other turning movements would beat a LOS B. The 2017 LOS would be a B in the AM peak hour and a C in the PM peak hour. A queue length analysis was performed for the left turn lane on Smithtown Road back to the intersection with Country Club Road. It was found that a 138 -foot storage length would be required for this left turn movement in the PM peak hour. It is anticipated that approximately 150 feet would be available between these intersections. The 2017 storage length required would be 182 feet. By 2017 as the queue lengths begin to be excessive, the County will be evaluating the need for CSAH 19 to be four lanes. This would then reduce the queues by approximately one -half. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 ' Traffic Study City of Shorewood Page 20 WSB Project No. 1120.00 7 L n 0 tA1120.00.oad.dm2adr.don Page 21 X Z� r r, Bli 9 BINS, Smithtown Road � y ti 191 1 127 —► �� ` O ( 51 1 31 o m Ln M In R ■ U U Legend 1 j► Lane Configuration XX -AM M -PM - 350 Weecxaoe Lake office Traffic Study i� SB Saa la 654 �,/ 6 Minneapdi M 55428 Country Club Rd/Yellowstone Tr/Lake Lindon Dr 012-641 -8M From: CUR 19 to TH 7 & Arsodafm, Mr. FAX 541 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS City of Shorewood, Hennepin County ti \1120.00 \ccd\ cm3ddt.dgn MB Purled No. 1120.00 Date: October 27,1998 1997 Peak Hour Volumes With Proposed Lane Configuration (Alt 3) Figure 8 Page 22 I� �L J ti\1120.00\aad.am2adtf.dgn Page 23- 1 tAlQO.00.00d\am3cdt t.Ggn Page 24 ' TABLE 6 ' CSAH 19 AT SMITHTOWN ROAD I COUNTRY CLUB ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ' CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN u 1 n 1997 A.M. PEAK ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION DELAY LOS Existing (Unsignalized) 18.4 C 1 32.9 C 2 22.1 C 3 10.3 B P.M. PEAK ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION DELAY LOS Existing (Unsignalized) * F 1 * F 2 42.5 E 3 10.9 B 2017 A.M. PEAK ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION DELAY LOS Existing (Unsignalized) F 1 F 2 27.6 D 3 12.4 B P.M. PEAK ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION DELAY LOS Existing (Unsignalized) * F 1 F 2 F 3 18.8 C Page 25 V. SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION Traffic signal warrants are based on the highest eight hour volumes (Warrants #1, #2, and #8), accident experience (Warrant #6), highest four hour volume (Warrant #9), or peak hour volume (Warrant #11). The requirements for each warrant can be found in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Each build alternative was analyzed to determine if traffic signal warrants were met for each alternative. The results of the signal justification analysis indicates that for all three alternatives, the intersection would meet traffic signal warrants. Alternative 3 would also meet additional warrants if selected. A summary of each warrant and hours met is shown in Table 7. The traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets can be found in the Appendix. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study City of Sh orewood Page 26 WSB Project No. 1120.00 TABLE 7 CSAH 19 AT SMITHTOWN ROAD / COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVE 1 and 2 Meets Warrant ? No. Hours Meet No. Hours Required Warrant # 1 Yes 13 8 Warrant # 2 No 2 8 Warrant # 6 Yes N/A N/A Warrant # 8 No 15/15 8 Warrant # 9 Yes 14 4 Warrant # 11 Yes 5 1 ALTERNATIVE 3 Meets Warrant ? No. Hours Meet No. Hours Required Warrant # 1 Yes 14 8 Warrant # 2 Yes 13 8 Warrant # 6 Yes N/A N/A Warrant # 8 Yes 15/15 8 Warrant # 9 Yes 12 4 Warrant # 11 Yes 4 1 Page 27 t VI. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS ' The purpose of this intersection study was to address the operational and safety concerns for the Country Club Road/Yellowstone Trail/Lake Linden Drive corridor, as well as the intersection of CSAH 19 at Smithtown Road/Country Club Road. In addition, this study evaluated the need and ' justification for a traffic signal installation at the CSAH 19 intersection. The analysis yielded the following conclusions: ' • The existing traffic volumes indicate that approximately 22% to 23% of the traffic on CSAH 19 is turning onto Country Club Road or Smithtown Road. • Approximately 43% ofthe traffic on Country Club Road/Yellowstone Trail and Lake Linden Drive is traveling between CSAH 19 and TH 7. • The crash data indicate that this intersection is well above the county -wide average accident and severity rate for a stop sign controlled intersection. ' • The existing intersection with the existing lane configurations and stop sign control is operating at a LOS F during the PM peak hour and C in the AM peak hour. ' • With the addition of only a traffic signal system and no other improvements (alternative 1), the intersection LOS would not change from a LOS F during the PM peak hour and C during the AM peak hour. • With the addition of a left turn lane for southbound CSAH 19 and the installation ' of a traffic signal system (alternative 2), the overall intersection LOS would increase to a LOS E during the PM peak hour and LOS C during the AM peak hour. ' • The realignment of the intersection resulting in CSAH 19 being the through movements (alternative 3), the overall intersection LOS would increase to a LOS B in the AM and PM peak hours. ' • The 2017 projected traffic volumes indicate that the LOS for alternatives 1 and 2, would be D or worse. Alternative 3 would be at a satisfactory LOS C or better. ' In addition to the conclusions stated above, listed below are the following advantages and disadvantages for each alternative. ' Alternative 1: Existing Geometrics with a Traffic Signal System Advantages: Low construction cost. ' No right -of -way required. State aid dollars can be used for all city costs. ' Disadvantages: Does not address cut - through traffic. Does not provide for future intersection capacity. Provides no operational improvements in the intersection. t Queue lengths during peak hours are excessive. Excessive delay during peak hours County would require additional improvements. Count ry Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 ' Traffic Study City of Shorewood Page 28 WSB Project No. 1120.00 0 Alternative 2: Southbound Left Turn Lane with a Traffic Signal System Advantages: Moderate city costs. No right -of -way required. Little improvement in operational characteristics. Delineation of left -turn lanes. State aid dollars can be used for all city costs. Disadvantages: Does not address cut - through traffic. Does not provide for future intersection capacity. Provides minimal operational improvements. Queue lengths during peak hours are excessive. Excessive delay during peak hours. Alternative 3: Intersection Realignment with a Traffic Signal System Advantages: Addresses cut - through traffic (reduces traffic on Country approximately 25 %). Provides good operational improvements. Provides for future capacity in the intersection. Queue lengths during peak hours are manageable. Develops the through movements as the county road. State aid dollars can be used for all city construction costs. Small delays during peak hours. Disadvantages: High city costs. Right -of -way required. Club Road Based on the information found in this study and the conclusions discussed above, the following recommendations are made: • Construct Alternative 3: Realigning the intersection to provide for better traffic flow and safety, now and in the future. • Begin discussions with the City of Tonka Bay on right -of -way acquisition for the realignment alternative. (The County will provide this service if requested.) • Begin discussions with Hennepin County on the realignment alternative. Currently, the County has funding available for 1999 for improvements to this intersection. They are willing to participate on a larger scale ifthe project is delayed to the year 2000. • Construct a temporary wood pole span mounted traffic signal systein in 1999 if the realignment alternative cannot be accomplished in that time frame. The delays would relate strictly to the acquisition of right -of -way and funding. This should only be pursued if the City feels an urgent need for a signal system. The signal system will be 100% city cost. Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 ' Traffic Study City of Shorewood Page 29 WSB Project No. 1120.00 L.J n 0 APPENDIX ' Country Club Road - CSAH 19 to TH 7 Traffic Study ' City of Shorewood Page 30 WSB Project No. 1120.00 I I I I I I I I I &HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXAM.HCO Page I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 -------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) CSAH 19 (E-W) SMITHTOWN Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst .................... BLH Date of Analysis .......... 10/9/98 Other Information 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC - AM PEAK NO BU ILD' Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI s SU/RVIs CV's PCE I s ----------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 11 92 18 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 N 473 154 24 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 3 1. 14 ---------------- 0 > I < 0 49 78 31 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 �1.14 1.14 1.14 ---------------- 0 > 1 1 5 36 282 .95 .95 .95 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 --------------- I F� I I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 I F� I I n HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXAM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 106 174 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1224 1130 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1224 1130 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.72 0.97 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 116 187 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1509 1396 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1509 1396 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.62 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Queue_ Free State - -------- ---- 58 0_ -- - - - - -- - 0_ 99 - of - - - - - Step 3: TH from Minor Street - -- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 804 800 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 413 415 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.57 0.57 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 235 237 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.82 0.60 Step 4: IT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 848 958 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 342 295 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.34 0.47 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.47 0.58 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.46 0.42 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------- 156 123 - - - - -- I 11 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXAM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary ' Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay ' Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) - -- - - - -- (sec /veh) --- - - - - -- -- - - EB EB - - -- L T - - - - -- 59 94 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - 123 > 237 > 210 122.0 - - - 12.0 F 122.0 EB R 38 1130 > ' WB L 6 156 > 221 20.9 0.9 D WB T 43 235 > 6.2 WB R 339 1224 4.1 1.3 A ' NB L 14 1396 2.6 0.0 A 0.2 SB L 569 1509 3.8 2.0 A 2.8 ' Intersection Delay = 18.4 sec /veh 11 I I I I L� I � 17 j 11 I I I I C 11 I I I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ---------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst: BLH File Name: 19ALT1AM.HC9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 AM PEAK Comment: 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC / ALT 1 - NO BUILD --------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --- ------ ---- --- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- < No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 0 > 1 1 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 49 78 31 5 36 282 11 92 18 473 154 24 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NIB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.OA Green 12.OA 41.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- - -- EB LTR 372 1457 0.470 0.256 19.0 C 19.0 C WB LT 441 1727 0.104 0.256 16.6 C 26.5 D R 391 1530 0.800 0.256 28.0 D NB LTR 228 1577 0.588 0.144 26.1 D 26.1 D SB LTR 726 1555 0.998 0.467 40.6 E 40.6 E Intersection Delay = 32.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = Q.871 -------------------------------------------------------- fl r 0 it 1 Ll HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01 -14 -1999 ------- - - - - -- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation --------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E -W) SMITHTOWN RD /CSAH 19 (N -S) COUNTRY CLUB /CSAH 19 Analyst;_-BLH File Name-..19ALT22g _ iC9 Area Type: Other 8 -24 -98 AM PEAK Comment,: 1997 EXISTING -TRAFFIC J_ AT _2 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --------- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- No . Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Volumes 49 78 31 5 36 282 11 92 18 473 154 24 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 23.OA Green 31.OA 21.OA Yellow /AR 5.0 Yellow /AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length_: 90 _sect Phase combination. _order :_ Al 15 . =4_6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Groug: Adj Sam vas g/S Appr�ch Mvmts - Cap - - Flow - Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 389 1458 0.450 0.267 18.3 C 18.3 C WB LT 457 1713 0.101 0.267 16.1 C 24.3 C R 408 1530 0.767 0.267 25.5 D NB L 418 1710 0.029 0.244 16.7 C 17.8 C TR 429 1756 0.284 0.244 17.9 C SB L 6.0B _171 _9 8-E5 _0.,_35.6 26.2 D 22.8 C TR 627 1764 0.316 0.356 13.7 B Intersection Del_ ay = 22_,1 sec /veh Inter -secti -on LOS = C Lost Time /Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v /c(x) = 0.671 11 I I I I I F I I I I I I I F I HCM: SIGNALIZED -INTER S ECT ION -_SUMMARY Ve r.Gi nn _2_4 f .01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst: BLH File Name_:.1_9ALT3AM__HC!9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 AM PEAK Comment: 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC ALT__3 - NEW ALIGNMENT ------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - - -- No . Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volumes 476 170 41 282 141 96 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Lett NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 4.OA 43.OA Green 28.OA Yellow/AR - 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length-; • 90,.-secs .--Phase combination order-: 41-42 15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group.-; Adj Sat Y-/--c --S/-C Approach: Mvmts - - - Flow - Flow - Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB T 880 1800 0.601 0.489 11.6 B 10.8 B R 748 1530 0.253 0.489 8.7 B WB L 185 1710 0.249 0.589 6.8 B 6.1 B T 1060 1800 0.295 0.589 6.0 B NB L 551 1710 0.285 0.322 14.8 B 14.6 B R -4-93 153 0 -- 0- _.2 -1-7 - __0 .-3 2 2 14.4 B Intersection Delay = 10.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle,_-L = 12_0 se-c critical v/cAx) =__0_.A_7j6 ------------------------------------------------------------- 7 --------- I n 1 , HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXPM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 ------------------------------------------------ Streets: (N -S) CSAH 19 (E -W) SMITHTOWN Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... BLH Date of Analysis.......... 10/9/98 Other Information......... 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC - PM PEAK - NO BU ILD Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection -------------- -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- ------------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU /RVIs (�) CV's M PCEIs 0 > 1 < 0 N 38 139 16 .95 .95 .95 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 N 387 128 50 .95 .95 .95 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 55 136 51 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 0 > 1 1 9 132 371 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 I Adjustment Factors 0 1� Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap- (tg, Time (tf) - - -- - ------------------------ Left Turn Major Road - - - - -- ------ 5.00 - - 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 0 1� �l L HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 154 162 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1157 1146 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1157 1146 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.61 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 163 188 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1434 1395 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1434 1395 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.68 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.64 0.96 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 790 772 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 420 429 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.61 0.61 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 257 263 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.38 0.38 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 862 1028 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 335 269 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.23 0.23 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.37 0.37 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.35 0.23 Movement (pcph) -------------------------------------------------- 117 61 - - - - -- * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19EXPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh)_(veh)_ _____ (sec /veh) EB L 66 61 > EB T 163 263 > 166 * 66.1 F EB R 62 1146 > WB L 10 117 > 240 48.6 6.0 F WB T 159 257 > 17.1 WB R 447 1157 5.1 2.1 B NB L 46 1395 2.7 0.0 A 0.5 SB L 465 1434 3.7 1.6 A 2.5 Intersection Delay = 235.0 sec /veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. I E I I I I I I I E L� I I I I I I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst BLH File ,Name: --C19ALT1-HC!-9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 PM PEAK Comment; 19-97 EXI-STING---TRAFFI-C,-.-/ ALT-1 - NO- JIUI-LD ------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- No. Lanes --------- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 1 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 55 136 51 9 132 742 38 139 16 387 128 50 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 20.OA 25.0A Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length-: _99 secs Phase combi -nation arder: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Groups Ad-j Sat VIC 91-C Ap -acb Grou -pro Mvmts Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- EB LTR - - - Flow - --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- - 462 1342 0.582 0.344 17.0 C 17.0 C WB LT 590 1713 0.266 0.344 13.8 B R 527 1530 1.563 0.344 NB LTR 458 1584 0.468 0.289 17.6 C 17.6 C- SB LTR 36-1 1546 1.741 0.233 Intersection De�.ay A-sec/veh) _Intersection. LOG (g/C)*(V/c) _ is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I HCM: SIQNA1J=_1NTERSFZT1ON_ZUMMARY -_VRx_%±on__2__4f _-01 -14 -1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation -------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst:,-BL-H File Name: CR19AL2A_H_C_9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 PM PEAK Comment: 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC -_/ ALT 2 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Volumes 55 136 51 9 132 742 38 139 16 387 128 50 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 -2 -3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 45.OA Green 21.OA 9.,OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5. Cycle Length: 90 - secs --Phase,- combination ,--order:.. _#1 - #5 __#_6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj ..$at vliQ ,Approach.; Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- - -- EB LTR 692 1355 0.388 0.511 8.9 B 8.9 B WB LT 881 1723 0.178 0.511 7.7 B 47.0 E R 782 1530 1.053 0.511 54.5 E NB L 190 1710 0.221 0.111 23.6 C 43.0 E TR 197 1772 0.873 0.111 47.7 E SB L A_L8 --1-7-3-0 _1-_02-8 __0_2" ---6-3--8 �F --4-9-8 E TR 421 1724 0.470 0.244 19.4 C Intersecti-on Dela = 42,5 sec,/veh-..Inter-sec-ti-on--LO.S =.--E Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1.023 . ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I I 11 I I I I 11 I� I LI I I I I I I I Ll HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ----------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst,; -B-LH File Name-; •• C-SAH19AL-H-C9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 PM PEAK Comment -19-9 7.--EXJM-ING.-TRAFFIC ALT-3 --NEW-ALIGNMENT Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - - -- No . Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volumes 387 178 41 742 194 152 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase C-ombination-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 26.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle L ength: 90 secs Phase comb in-at ion., -order - X1 .#2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Approach: p:. -Adj S at v-/-c --gzC A Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- - -- EB T 920 1800 0.467 0.511 9.4 B 9.0 B R 782 1530 0.253 0.511 8.0 B WB L 274 1710 0.168 0.611 5.3 B 9.9 B T 1100 1800 0.749 0.611 10.1 B NB L 513 1710 0.421 0.300, 16.6 C 16.5 C R 459 1530 0.368 0.300 16.2 C Intersection Delay = 10.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle -L = -8.0-sec --Critical v-/CJx) = O--b41 ------------------------------------------------------------- 7 --------- I 1 0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19PAM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 Streets: (N -S) CSAH 19 (E -W) SMITHTOWN Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... BLH Date of Analysis.......... 10/9/98 Other Information......... 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFIC - AM PEAK - NO B UILD Two-way - Stop-controlled - Int ersection ----------------------------- - - - - -- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU /RVIs (�) CV's M PCE's 0 > 1 < 0 N 14 120 23 .95 .95 .95 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 N 629 205 32 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 64 101 40 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 0 > 1 1 6 47 366 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 L 0 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up ' Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ' Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 2.10 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 L 0 7 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19PAM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 138 233 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1179 1055 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1179 1055 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.63 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 150 250 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1454 1303 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1454 1303 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.48 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: ( pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major IT Shared Lane Prob. Queue_ Free State - 39 099 - of - - ------------------------------------ Step 3: TH from Minor Street ----------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1065 1060 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 301 303 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.38 0.38 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 116 116 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.52 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1122 1265 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 237 196 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.00 0.20 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.00 0.33 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.00 0.21 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------- 0 41 - - - - -- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19PAM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%- Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) - - -- (sec /veh) --- - - - - -- -- - - EB - - -- L - - - - -- 77 - - - - -- - - - - -- 41 > - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - EB T 121 116 > 83 * 83.0 F EB R 48 1055 > WB L 7 0> 0 * * F WB T 56 116 > WB R 440 1179 4.9 2.0 A NB L 17 1303 2.8 0.0 A 0.2 SB L 757 1454 5.2 3.5 B 3.7 Intersection Delay = * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. I E I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst: 13LH Tile Name-; 19ALT1,PA__HC9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 AM PEAK Comment: 2-017-PRIM-ECTED TRAF_FT_C_,/._ALT__1 -_NO__BUILD Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ---- ----- ---- 0 > 1 0 < ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 1 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 64 101 40 6 47 366 14 120 23 629 205 32 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right 'Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.OA Green 10.OA 47.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5. Cycle Length: __90 sec-s Phase combination __ord _er: _#1 _#5-- j-6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group-: Adj Sat v/ c -91-C Appxoa_ch : Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- - -- ----- EB LTR ---- ------- ----- ----- 298 1414 0.761 0.211 28.9 D 28.9 D WB LT 345 1634 0.171 0.211 18.8 C R 323 1530 1.260 0.211 NB LTR 193 1577 0.908 0.122 53.3 E 53.3 E SB LTR 829 1555 1.161 0.533 Intersection Delay = *-Asec/veh) Intersection LOS (g/C)*(V/c) ---------- is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. — ---------- I I I E I I I I I I I I I 1 7 j I I I I HCM: SIPMUI=-JMERSECT-T-ON-gLZBIARV --Versi-on.-Z.Af Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ---------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst; BLH File Name :,1-9ALT2.A2-BC-9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 AM PEAK Comment: 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFIC_ ALT -2 ----------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Volumes 64 101 40 6 47 366 14 120 23 629 205 32 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.OA Green 37.OA 12.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length; 90.secs Pha-se-combination-order: -#1 #5 --#5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat Approach: Mvmts - - - Flow - Flow - Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB LTR 428 1425 0.531 0.300 18.0 C 18.0 C WB LT 507 1691 0.116 0.300 14.8 B 30.2 D R 459 1530 0.886 0.300 32.4 D NE L 247 1710 0.065 0.144 21.5 C 26.3 D TR 254 1756 0.627 0.144 26.8 D SB L 79 A71 -a--gj" --O.-A-22 35.5 D 28.9 D TR 745 1764 0.355 0.422 11.5 B Intersection Delay = --27.6-sec_/veh Intersection -LOS =.-D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.883 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 I I I I L I I I I I I I P I I I I I I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ---------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst: BLH File Name: 19AL3A2.HC9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 AM PEAK Comment: 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFIC / ALT 3 - NEW ALIGNMENT Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - -- No . Lanes --------- ---- 0 1 1 ---- ---- ---- 1 1 0 ---- ---- ---- 1 0 1 ---- ---- - 0 0 0 Volumes 629 236 53 367 183 125 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 4.OA 43.OA Green Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- EB T - - - Flow - --- ---- ----- - 880 1800 0.794 ----- ----- --- ----- 0.489 16.0 C 14.1 B R 748 1530 0.350 0.489 9.3 B WB L 175 1710 0.337 0.589 9.2 B 6.8 B T 1060 1800 0.385 0.589 6.5 B NB L 551 1710 0.368 0.322 15.3 C 15.1 C R 493 1530 0.282 0.322 14.8 B Intersection Delay = 12.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.625 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 IJ L u HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19PPM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 --------------- - -- Streets: (N -S) CSAH 19 (E -W) SMITHTOWN Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... BLH Date of Analysis.......... 10/9/98 Other Information......... 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFIC - PM PEAK - NO B UILD Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection ---------------------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s ( o ) SU /RVIs (�) CV's M PCEIs 0 > 1 < 0 N 49 191 21 .95 .95 .95 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 N 515 170 67 .95 .95 .95 1 1 3 1.14 0 > 1 < 0 72 177 66 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 11.14 1.14 1.14 0 > 1 1 12 172 965 .95 .95 .95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1.14 1.14 1.14 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 ' Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f 19PPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 212 214 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1081 1079 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1081 1079 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.00 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph.) 223 250 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1342 1303 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1342 1303 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.54 0.95 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Queue_ Free State - 46 0_ - -- - 0_ 95 - of - - ------------ - - - Step 3: TH from Minor Street - -- - - - WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph.) 1056 1032 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 305 313 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.43 0.43 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 133 136 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.00 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1148 1619 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 229 122 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.00 0.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.00 0.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 0 0 ' HCS__Unsignalized_ Intersections Release _2_lf__ 19PPM_HCO Page _3 Intersection Performance Summary ' Avg. 95W Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay ' Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) - (veh) - - - - -- - - - -- (sec /veh) --- - - - - -- ' -- - - EB EB - - -- L T - - - - -- 87 213 - - - - -- - - - - -- 0 > 136 > 0 - - - - - -- * * F EB R 79 1079 > ' WB L 15 0 > 0 * * F WB T 207 133 > WB R 1161 1081 174.2 64.3 F NB L 59 1303 2.9 0.0 A 0.5 SB L 620 1342 5.0 2.8 A 3.4 ' Intersection Delay = I * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. �7 I I I I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center Microcomputers In Transportation - - ----------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) - For -- SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst: ... BLH -.-File Name: 19ALT1PP-HC9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 PM PEAK Comment,; 20-17--PRO-J-FCTED--TRAF.FJ-C.-/--ALT-1 ---NO--BUILD Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes --------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 72 177 66 12 172 965 49 181 21 515 170 67 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase CDmbination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds P�eds WB Lett SB Left Thru Right Thru Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 16.OA Green 18.OA 41.OA Yellow[AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length-; Phase comb older: rder: #1 #5 #6 ----------------- -- 90ec-s Intersection Performance Summary Lane Mvmts Group: Adj _Sat Y-/.-c _q/-C Approach: Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----- EB LTR - - - Flow - --- ---- ----- ----- ----- --- - 162 860 2.154 0.189 WB LT 141 749 1.443 0.189 R 289 1530 3.708 0.189 NB LTR 335 1585 0.831 0.211 33.0 D 33.0 D SB LTR 721 1546 1.157 0.467 Intersection Delay = * Isec-/veh) Inter-sertion LOS (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. I I I I Ll I HCM : S I PNA TNTIER SM - TTON . SUMMARY .- Vier -lion 2 - -4 f - .111 - 14 - 3.99 9 Center Microcomputers In Transportation ------- - - - - Streets: (E - For -- ------------------------------------- -W) SMITHTOWN RD /CSAH 19 (N -S) COUNTRY CLUB /CSAH 19 Analyst: BLH File Name: CR19172P-HC9 Area Type: Other 8 -24 -98 PM PEAK Comment: 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFIC/ ALT-2 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- No . Lanes --------- - - -- 0 > 1 < 0 - - -- - - -- - - -- 0 > 1 1 - - -- - - -- - - -- 1 1 < 0 - - -- 1 1 < 0 Volumes 72 177 66 12 172 965 49 181 21 515 170 67 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 - 4_00 - 4_00 4.00 4.00 ---- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 48.OA Green 13.OA 14.OA Yellow /AR 5.0 Yellow /AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 90_ secs Phase combination_ order :.._#1 -#5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group:, Adj Sat v/c Approach -: Mvmts -9/-C Cap I Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS - - - -- - -- - - - -- EB LTR - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- 699 1284 0.501 0.544 8.8 B 8.8 B WB LT 915 1681_ 0.223 0.544 6.9 B R 833 1530 1.287 0.544 NB L 285 1710 0.189 0.167 20.9 C 28.6 D TR 295 1773 0.758 0.167 30.4 D SB L -96 - -�a-10 -2-15-0 - 0.X5-6 TR 268 1724 0.980 0.156 61.5 F Intersection Delay _ * Isecweh) LOS = (g /C) *(V /c) ----------------------------------------------------------------- __ is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasil)le. - - - - -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 01-14-1999 Center Microcomputers In Transportation - For ------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) SMITHTOWN RD/CSAH 19 (N-S) COUNTRY CLUB/CSAH 19 Analyst :.,13LH File Name--; 10_ALT_3P2_HC9 Area Type: Other 8-24-98 PM PEAK Comment: 2017 PROJECTED TRAFFICJ ALT-3 - NEW .ALIGNMENT ------------------------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- No . Lanes --------- ---- 0 1 1 ---- ---- ---- 1 1 0 ---- ---- ---- 1 0 1 ---- ---- 0 0 0 Volumes 515 236 183 965 252 198 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.OA 38.OA Green 25.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: ---90-secs Phas-e c-ombinati-on. -order: #1 #2 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj --Sat v_/__c -9vC Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- - -- ----- EB T ---- ------- ----- ----- 780 1800 0.733 0.433 16.2 C 14.7 B R 663 1530 0.395 0.433 11.5 B WB L 327 1710 0.621 0.622 13.6 B 21.6 C T 1120 1800 0.957 0.622 23.2 C NB L 494 1710 0.567 0.289 18.7 C 18.4 C R 442 1530 0.498 0.289 17.9 C Intersection Delay = 18.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost TimejCycle,--L = 8- 0_._ se- -..Critical v/c (x) = 0.833 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I I � i_ QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 1 (1997) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES COUNTRY CLUB ROADISMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 ' SIGNALIZED: Q - 2V(1 -G /C)L Q = Queue length in feet 36001C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds ' L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR ' CSAH 19-SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND V= 565 SOUTHBOUND V= 651 ALTERNATIVE 11997 G= 20 Q = 1004 G= 41 Q= 354 C= 180 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 ' COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND NORTHBOUND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V= 193 V= 121 ALTERNATIVE 11997 G= 25 Q = 332 G= 12 Q= 105 ' C= 180 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 SMITHTOWN ROAD SMITHTOWN ROAD ' EASTBOUND - PM PEAK HOUR EASTBOUND - AM PEAK HOUR SMITHTOWN ROAD - EASTBOUND V= 242 V= 158 ALTERNATIVE 1 1997 G= 30 Q= 403 G= 22 Q= 119 C= 180 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT CSAH 19- WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT V= 141 V= 41 ALTERNATIVE 11997 G= 30 Q = 235 G= 22 Q= 31 C= 180 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 I � i_ ' QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 1 (2017) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES COUNTRY CLUB ROAD /SMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 SIG NALIZED: Q = 2V(1 -G /C)L Q = Queue length in feet I� J 36001C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CSAH 19-SOUTHBOUND V= 752 V= 866 ALTERNATIVE 12017 G= 41 Q= 1161 G= 47 Q = 1280 C= 180 C= 180 L= 25 L= 25 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND NORTHBOUND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V= 251 V= 157 ALTERNATIVE 12017 G= 18 Q= 452 G= 10 Q = 297 C= 180 C= 180 L= 25 L= 25 SMITHTOWN ROAD SMITHTOWN ROAD EASTBOUND - PM PEAK HOUR EASTBOUND - AM PEAK HOUR SMITHTOWN ROAD - EASTBOUND V= 315 V= 205 ALTERNATIVE 12017 G= 16 Q= 574 G= 18 Q = 369 C= 180 C= 180 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT CSAH 19- WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT V= 184 V= 53 ALTERNATIVE 12017 G= 16 Q= 335 G= 18 Q= 95 C= 180 C= 180 L= 25 L= 25 1 QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 2 (1997) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES COUNTRY CLUB ROAD /SMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 SIGNALIZED: Q = 2V(1 -G1C)L Q = Queue length in feet 36001C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT CSAH 19- SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT V = 178 V = 178 ALTERNATIVE 2 1997 G = 21 Q= 136 G= 31 Q= 117 C= 90 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN CSAH 19-SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN V = 387 V = 473 ALTERNATIVE 2 1997 G = 21 Q= 297 G= 31 Q= 310 C= 90 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT NORTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 155 V = 110 THRU -RIGHT G = 9 Om 140 G= 21 Q= 84 ALTERNATIVE 2 1997 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 38 V = 11 LEFT TURN G = 9 Q= 34 G= 21 Q=8 ALTERNATIVE 21997 C= 90 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 SMITHTOWN ROAD SMITHTOWN ROAD EASTBOUND - PM PEAK HOUR EASTBOUND - AM PEAK HOUR SMITHTOWN ROAD - EASTBOUND V = 242 V = 158 ALTERNATIVE 21997 G = 45 Q = 121 G= 23 Q. 118 C= 90 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT CSAH 19- WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT V = 141 V = 41 ALTERNATIVE 21997 G = 45 Q= 71 G= 23 Q= 31 C= 90 C= 90 L= 25 L= 25 QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 2 (2017) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES COUNTRY CLUB ROAD /SMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 I SIGNALIZED: u 0 Q - 2V(1 -G /C)L Q = Queue length in feet 3600 1C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet �` l CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR. SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT CSAH 19-SOUTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT V = 237 V = 237 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 G = 13 Q = 440 G = 37 Q = 377 C = 180 C = 180 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19- PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19- AM PEAK HOUR SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN CSAH 19-SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN V = 515 V = 629 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 G = 13 Q= 956 G = 37 Q= 999 C = 180 C = 180 L = 25 L = 25 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT NORTHBOUND THRU -RIGHT COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 202 V = 143 THRU -RIGHT G = 14 Q= 373 G = 12 Q = 267 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 C = 180 C = 180 L = 25 L = 25 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -PM PEAK COUNTRY CLUB ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 49 V = 14 LEFT TURN G = 14 Q= 90 G = 12 Q= 26 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 C = 180 C = 180 L = 25 L = 2 �` l SMITHTOWN ROAD SMITHTOWN ROAD EASTBOUND - PM PEAK HOUR EASTBOUND - AM PEAK HOUR SMITHTOWN ROAD - EASTBOUND V = 315 V = 205 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 G = 48 Q= 462 G = 26 Q= 351 C = 180 C = 180 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT CSAH 19- WESTBOUND THRU -LEFT V = 184 V = 53 ALTERNATIVE 2 2017 G = 48 Q= 270 G = 26 Q= 91 C = 180 C = 180 L= 25 L= 25 �` l QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 3 (1997) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 SIGNALIZED: Q = 2V(1 -G /C)L Q = Queue length in feet 3600 /C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet SMITHTOWN ROAD -PM PEAK SMITHTOWN ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN SMITHTOWN ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 152 V = 96 RIGHT TURN G = 26 am 108 G= 28 Q= 66 ALTERNATIVE 31997 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 SMITHTOWN ROAD -PM PEAK SMITHTOWN ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN SMITHTOWN ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 194 V = 141 LEFT TURN G = 26 Q = 138 G = 28 Q= 97 ALTERNATIVE 31997 C = 90 C = 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19-PM PEAK CSAH 19 -AM PEAK EASTBOUND THRU EASTBOUND THRU CSAH 19- EASTBOUND V = 387 V = 476 THRU G = 45 Oz 194 G = 43 Q= 249 ALTERNATIVE 3 1997 C = 90 C = 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 -PM PEAK CSAH 19 -AM PEAK EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN CSAH 19- EASTBOUND V = 178 V = 170 RIGHT TURN G = 45 Q= 89 G= 43 Q= 89 ALTERNATIVE 31997 C = 90 C = 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU WESTBOUND THRU CSAH 19- WESTBOUND V = 742 V = 282 THRU G = 49 Q= 338 G = 47 Q= 135 ALTERNATIVE 31997 C = 90 C = 90 L= 25 L= 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND LEFT TURN WESTBOUND LEFT TURN CSAH 19- WESTBOUND V = 41 V = 41 LEFT TURN G = 49 Q = 19 G= 47 Q= 20 ALTERNATIVE 31997 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 1 QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATION ALTERNATIVE 3 (2017) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SMITHTOWN ROAD /CSAH 19 SIGNALIZED: 0 1 0 F n Q = 2V(1 -G /C)L Q = Queue length in feet 3600 1C V = Vehicles per hour in lane G = Green time for approach in seconds C = Signal cycle length in seconds L = Average storage length of vehicle in feet SMITHTOWN ROAD -PM PEAK SMITHTOWN ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN SMITHTOWN ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 198 V = 125 RIGHT TURN G = 25 Q= 143 G= 28 Q= 86 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 SMITHTOWN ROAD -PM PEAK SMITHTOWN ROAD -AM PEAK NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN SMITHTOWN ROAD - NORTHBOUND V = 252 V = 183 LEFT TURN G = 25 Q= 182 G = 28 Q = 126 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19 -PM PEAK CSAH 19 -AM PEAK EASTBOUND THRU EASTBOUND THRU CSAH 19- EASTBOUND V = 515 V = 629 THRU G = 38 Q= 298 G = 43 Q= 328 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19 -PM PEAK CSAH 19 -AM PEAK EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN CSAH 19- EASTBOUND V = 236 V = 236 RIGHT TURN G = 38 Q= 136 G = 43 Q = 123 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND THRU WESTBOUND THRU CSAH 19- WESTBOUND V = 965 V = 367 THRU G = 50 Q= 429 G = 47 Q = 175 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 CSAH 19 - PM PEAK HOUR CSAH 19 - AM PEAK HOUR WESTBOUND LEFT TURN WESTBOUND LEFT TURN CSAH 19- WESTBOUND V = 183 V = 53 LEFT TURN G = 50 Q = 81 G= 47 Q= 25 ALTERNATIVE 3 2017 C = 90 C = 90 L = 25 L = 25 Scheduled Interviews Monday, January 25, 1999 Performance Evaluation Services O r First Last Company Address City St Zip Phone Fax Inter- Name Name view Time Arlene Vernon HRX 8605 Darnel Rd - Eden Prairie MN 75344 9 -0 75 5:30 Susan Hagstruni The Bridgewater Group 17477 Bridgewater Minnetonka MN 55345 476 -4468 449-0674 5:50 Circle Don Salverda Don Salverda & Roseville Professional Roseville MN 55113 484 -1335 6:10 Associates Ctr, 2233 N Hamlin Ave om Allen Allen & Associates 4749 Coven Rd E Minnetonka MN 55345 988 -9332 6:30 Cn fst Jan -21 -99 04:08P Arlene Vernon - Oehmke Take the next step to Human Resource Xcellence with expert w Arlene Vernon ,.,.�.'C_"x�. speaker - consultant - author Arlene motivates and activates with concrete, solid workplace solutions you can begin applying right now! Not only will you be energized but you'll be armed with specific action lists and clear strategies to put your energy to work. "Wow! More than excellentl" "Use fuL..realistic...dynamic...do- able." Arlene Vernon, BA, MEd, MBA, PHR, brings to her audiences over two decades of expertise and experience in Human Resources. But don't let the credentials and string of letters after her name fool you r Arlene is no dry academic. She is as fun as she is accomplished. With natural warmth and humor, she immediately engages an audience to create the best climate for learning. Arlene challenges you to be your best in an interactive atmosphere of enthusiasm and spontaneity. P.02 ■ Your Prescription for SuperVision: Managing the Employee Life Cycle "Uplifting and informative ... very creative!"' Substance meets style. Arlene's high - content programs are graced with infectious humor and enthusiasm. Her thorough preparation and comprehensive handouts are seasoned with entertaining anecdotes and delightful song parody. Arlene is committed to providing audiences with substantive material "beyond expectations." `Thank you for your fresh perspective.'- This was beyond `rah -rah' — this was practicril'r Custom - tailored - personal is how Arlene approaches each particular audience, combining expertise with natural talent Her intuitive skills and fluid style allow her to respond to the unique dynamics of each group. You will immediately sense Arlene's keen grasp on the issues and appreciate her ability to target your specific needs. E Keeping the Human in Human Resources ■ Holistic Hiring: Insightful Interviewing ■ Nextworking:. ElevatingYour Network to the Next Level i How's Your Business Pulse? A Self-Management Check -Up ■ Taking Care of Business, Taking Care ofYou ■ Professional Business Image: Presenting and Writing with Confidence Specializing in Customized Programs "Your program over - achieved our goall": + for the Business Professional For Practical Prescriptions You Can Apply Today AdM Agon 574 Prairie Center Drive - Suite 135/185 - Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612- 996 -0975 - fax: 612 -996 -0976 - email: HRxArlene(a)aol.rnm n Jan -21 -99 04:08P Arlene Vernon- Oehmke What Arlene's Clients Are Saying: "You were a hit' The comments 1 received from attendees were very positive. You covered considerable information in your presentation, and your enthusiasm and humor made the program complete. in my opinion, your presentation skills reflect your integrity and professional image." Business Women's Network "Arlene's insight into the ever changing human resource field is very impressive. l will try to implement as much as I can into my organization. Saint Paul Convention and Visitors Bureau "Your presentation was informative, entertaining and well structured. It is a pleasure working with you. l appreciate the Quality and professionalism you exhibit The song was terrific!" Customized Training Services Hennepin Technical College "Your energetic and down to earth 'bedside manner' certainly hit home with the audience and left them with a positive attitude and ideas for managing life, success and relationships. Thank you from all of us." National Association of Professional Organizers "The way you gear your presentations for your audience is very effective. Your exercise to keep them involved throughout your speech with "thinking" quettions is beneficial both personally and professionally. Thank you for the difference you make. Of course, your trademark singing is always a hit!" National Association of Professional Saleswomen h�X P.03 Clients Include: Fannie Mae Minneapolis Star Tribune Watson Wyatt Worldwide Clemson University Small Business Management Instructors Minnesota Workforce Center MEANSTelcom I.C. System Hirshfield's Alliance Business Centers Minnesota Society of Association Executives International Association of Business Communicators Life Office Marmgement Association (LOMA) American Business Women's Association Minnesota Dietary Management Association - -4 Iy� Business Poise: 161 Doses to Improve Your Self- Management and Effective Hiring and ADA Compliance, Arlene's professionalism and commitment to Xcellence extends to the care she gives her clients. You can be confident of the results when you entrust your program to Arlene. Let Arlene Vernon Be Your Prescription for Human Resource Xcellence Susan A. Hagstrum, Ph.D. Principal Consultant The Bridgewater Group Biography Dr. Susan Hagstrum's experience in leadership and organizational development spans a 27 year career in the public sector, serving not for profit organizations. Her ability to identify and prepare for the issues surrounding change and accountability has made her a popular speaker, process facilitator and workshop leader. Dr. Hagstrum believes that service organizations thrive when they seek the input of citizens and staff. She also believes that input from a broad cross- section of the community is the first step in answering the public's cry for accountability and identifying goals for organizational improvement. As Assistant Superintendent of Schools in several school districts, she worked to increase involvement in planning processes to reflect the best thinking of all stakeholders. She was also responsible for'strategic planning, designing action plans, and creating measurement systems to monitor progress and improve results. As Principal Consultant of The Bridgewater Group, she has created a team of consultants with broad experience in strategic planning and developing collaborative teams fo achieve results. They possess expertise in personnel performances appraisal systems, strategic communications, and Total Quality Management practices. Dr. Hagstrum is a Miirinesota Council for Quality Malcolm Baldrige Award Examiner. She has completed an assessment of a local business to determine use of quality practices as the key component in its application for a Minnesota Quality Award.. She has worked in schools to implement continuous improvement practices to enhance organizational performance and increase student achievement. She led a project in the Edina Public Schools to design a tool and gather data using it to improve processes in the school system. She also led a project in the Rochester (Minnesota) area schools to improve math and science achievement for students. ' IBM and the Mayo Clinic funded and participated in this project. She is currently working with the Minnetonka Public Schools Jo review the elementary program to enhance the quality of the programs offered to students. As a senior leader in the Chaska Public Schools, she led%a team. in completing an assessment of quality practices. Results of this assessment led to a school and district -level summary of quality processes and the establishment of school and district profiles of performance on key indicators. The Chaska School Board used the results of this assessment,to establish program improvement goals, and design a system of measurement to track progress on goals for'reports to the public. Dr. Hagstrum is a veteran of the Bush Foundation Public School Executive Fellows Program and has been a presenter at local, state and national meetings. Susan A. Hag strum, Ph.D. 17477 Bridgewater Circle Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 (612) 476 -4468 phone (612) 449 =0674 facsimile hagst005@tc.umn.edu e-mail Education University of Minnesota, 1987 Doctor of Philosophy, Educational Administration University of Minnesota, .1977 Master of Arts, Speech Science, Pathology and Audiology Northwestern University, 1970 Bachelor of Science, Speech pathology Areas of Expertise • Strategic management and planning for improved results • , Measurement systems for continuous improvement (TQM) • Conflict resolution/group problem solving • Organizational development with significant stakeholder involvement • Building collaborative teams Executive coaching Professional History .Experience in leadership and organizational development spans a 27 year career in the public sector with a primary focus on increasing staff and citizen involvement. Major responsibilities have included identifying and helping others prepare for the issues surrounding change and accountability. Special expertise includes design and implementation'of processes to resolve issues related to organization of the Administration, problem - solving related•to personnel roles and recommending improved leadership and management systems. 1997 -99 Principal Consultant, The Bridgewater Group Organizational Development/Ezecutive Coaching — Study and recommendations for improving leadership, management, and resolving personnel issues Rochester Catholic Schools Facilitator — Group problem- solving/conflict resolution, Minneapolis Public Schools Leadership - Implementing Continuous Improvement approaches to improving student achievement, Rochester Area Math/Science Partnership Strategic Planning - Designing process and facilitating planning mission, goals and action plans for school's annual plan, Minneapolis Public Schools 1992 -97 Director of Instructional Services, Chaska Public Schools Assistant Superintendent responsible for all K -12 programs. 1971 -92 Administrative and teaching positions`in curriculum and instruction NANCY H. BEACH Human Resource Consultant 5103 Colfax Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 612/825 -4556 Nancy Beach—'. • Has been employed as a human resource generalist and as a specialist in the areas of training and development, compensation, performance management, and organization development - • Is an experienced manager who understands the practical considerations in applying sound management principles • Listens and asks questions to ensure accurate understanding of clients' specific needs • Combines strong theoretical knowledge with a practical, results- oriented approach • Has helped clients find effective solutions in a variety of situations, ranging from planning for mergers and acquisitions to planning quality initiatives, from improving processes to improving morale, from aligning reward systems with corporate goals, to decreasing turnover; and from increasing management skills to increasing teamwork SERVICES... AREAS OF EXPERTISE — _ Consulting Training' and Development . Training design, development, delivery , Management and Organizational Human resource generalist services Effectiveness Meeting facilitation , Performance'Management Coaching/ counseling Career Development. Organizational analysis - Succession Planning and Executive Qualitative research Development 4 Employee Relations Team Building , Change Management Reward Systems EXPERIENCE ... CLIENTS (Partial List) ... Northwest Airlines NRG Energy, Inc. Human Resources Manager, Finance Grogp Gage Marketing Nfgr., Compensation and Performance Management Jostens Dain Bosworth First Bank System CNS,.Inc. Asst. V.P., Executive and Career Development Business Dynamics, Inc. Varitronic Systems, Inc. Control Data Corporation Pillsbury Training Consultant Select Comfort . . 01/20/99 14:53 FAX 6124490674 SUSAN RAGSTRUM 0102 NANCY H. BEACH 5103 Colfax Avenue South Minueapolis, Minaesola .55419 67 A25 -4SM PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1993- present Human Resource Consultant, Beach gt Associates • Served as interim Human Resource Nianagct for several clients Developed Competency models. curriculum designs. and selection questions forUUMMus companies Developed team leaders' guides and just4n -time skill miring modules on team eff a • Designed. developed and delivered training in Goal Settin /N Sd Managing Change F or mn . . Appraisal. Career Aanning. StaffmStinterviewiug m kills, an sales. and oporatiCh a Positions • Developed staffing function: recruited caocliducs; for key arlmdag. • Rcscatched cement trends and best practices is organization design and HR inf=ladon systems • Consusted team - building sessions and voxrsrxlted on organization de aso. 1991-1992 Human Resource Manager, Finance Group, Nortbwest Airlines • Built and managed 7- person HR function providing generalist services to 1:00 employees (6depts.) • LAd project to idennfy key managerial competencies. collect upward and downward feedtmck. and provide targeted development for Finance managers • Ltd effort to revamp MBA recruiting process. with significantly aohaneed rninotity tecntiting • Developed and implemented succession planning pr=ss ynicasion dolls • Trained managan Cat perfo®auce management. interviewing. interpersonal 1990-1991 Manager, Performance Management, Nortbwest Airlines • Managed performance management proem for NWA's 4700 management employees • Consulted on organization design issues, including reorganization of field sales offices, and an compensation issues. including development of incentives for passenger and cargo We personnel • Trained VPs, directors and managers on job evaluation. salary adaunistrauon, and goal setting • 1Vrmc "Managers' Guide to Dealing with pt.3omwee Problems" 1988-1990 Assistant Vice President. Executive and Career Development, First Bank System • Deigned new executive development axed succession plamung system • Directed planning and administradon for dprarterly Leadership Council meetings. resulting in increased strategic understanding and motivation for FBS's sixty top exeattivcs • Managed a unit of four people who provided career development services to FRS's 10.000 employees 1985-1998 Manager, Career Development Services, First Bank System center, and • Built a comprehensive career development function. offering workshops. career resource counseling • Managed delivery of professional development trainin g and New Employee Orientation • Designed, developed. and delivered management training 1991-1985 Training Consultant, Control Data Corporation • Designed and developed seminars and computer -based courses for executives. managers. and professional employees • Compiled executive development resource catalog, improving executives' ability to select appropriate programs • Directed selection and instailadon of computer -based succession, planning system • Managed $450K Control DataMuke Business School tesearch and devdopment project EDUCATION KA. in F.ducatiott, Tzinity College, Hartford. CT B.A. in English, Cornell University. Ithaca. NY Myers -Briggs Type Indicator Certifrradon PROJECTS The Bridgewater Group Susan A. Hagstrum, Ph.D. sa II ' 1 II Governance_ Study to Improve System Leadership and Management, Rochester Catholic School System; Rochester, Minnesota The consultant designed and conducted a study to determine the governance issues related to the formation of a Catholic school system comprised of member schools from individual parishes in the Rochester area. She interviewed stakeholders and made recommendations to Trustees, Council members and the Superintendent to assist -them in resolving concerns about creating and supporting a fully functional system for the benefit of students in the Catholic community: She presented a report summarizing the data she gathered and made recommendations for improving the - leadership and management of the system. She facilitated the Trustees in setting priorities to address the recommendations and, creating action plans for implementation: Annual Leadership Retreat, "Leading with Soul, Passion and Purpose," St. Louis Park Public Schools; St. Louis Park, Minnesota The consultant designed and facilitated the annual administrative retreat to provide reflection and inspiration for the 1998 -99 school year. Administrative team members read Leading with Soul. by Lee Bolman and Terrence Deal; to prepare for this one -day retreat. The consultant created study guides of this work and designed discussion and reflection activities for the team. The outcome was.a focus on effective leadership strategies for team members to empower their colleagues and enhance personal leadership effectiveness. Imnr�g Performance Through Total Ouality Management Practices Improving K -12 Math and Science Student Achievement, Rochester Area Math /Science Partnership; Rochester, Minnesota `International Business Machines (IBM) and the Mayo Clinic funded a project for 12 school districts in the Rochester Area to set goals and review progress toward improving math and science achievement for K -12 students. The project included the design and of a scoring system for districts to use in making judgments about their progress on improvement goals. 'The system is based on continuous improvement practices (Total Quality Management) and includes content from the Minnesota Council on Quality training 2 for Malcolm Baldrige Award examiners. A two -day workshop, "Results: Using Data to Increase Student Achievement," had four basic outcomes: • Provide basic information on the use of Total Quality'Management practices in schools. • Train participants in the use of student data for decision - making. • Describe the use of the scoring system. • Assist the districts in writing narrative reports detailing their progress on improvement goals. The consultant led a team of public and private school, business and medical partners in reviewing and scoring the school districts' narratives and writing a feedback report._ Results of the feedback reports were compiled and presented to the Rochester Area Math/Science Partnership Board with recommendations for measurement indicators, professional development strategies and follow -up study. Implementing Quality System Processes, Edina, Public Schools; Edina, Minnesota The purpose of the project was to assist the Edina Public Schools in implementing Quality Systems strategies of the 1998 -99 Strategic Plan. The consultant worked with a team of district representatives to design a matrix for applying the Edina Quality Principles as a tool to gather data for improving processes in the school system. The consultant designed and led the annual leadership retreat, "A Results Orientation: Using Edina Data to Improve Results." The Superintendent and school district-Leadership Team reviewed data gathered on the Quality Principles Matrix and participated in group planning activities to revitalize the focus and commitment to Continuous Improvement initiatives in the. district. Extended use of the matrix for improving all major processes and planning for further implementation of Continuous Improvement were also a part of the retreat. Follow -up action plans for revising the Matrix and extending its use took place following the retreat Design of Curricululn Review Process Increase Student Achievement, Scottsdale Public Schools; Scottsdale, Arizona The purpose of this project was to design and assist the administration in implementing a model for curriculum review to enhance student achievement in all 25 schools of this 22,000- student school district. The process included a focus on student, staff, parent and public input. The goal was to identify strategies to increase student achievement, improve curriculum and secure community support for the school program. The project included -three phases: • Internal data gathering and analysis to determine status of student achievement • Public input to determine program and curriculum concerns and develop community s upp or t • Curriculum process revision and design new review cycle Products included a summary of the focus group study of student, staff, parent and. public input, an analysis of student achievement trends for the district and individual buildings and a_model for completing design of the curriculum update process. 3 • • W% 1 •• //r . .• Conflict Resolution Strategy Development and Implementatidn for Parents and Staff, Ramsey International/Fine Arts School; Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis, Minnesota The consultant designed and implemented a conflict resolution strategy to address a school decision, which created an outraged parent group. Several planning meetings to design conflict management and communication strategies were held with parents and staff. Public meetings of angry constituents were facilitated using effective meeting practices and - conflict resolution techniques. Priorities for next steps were identified and plans for implementation resulted. Collaborative Legislative Planning Retreat, Minnesota Community Education Association The Minnesota Community Education Association organized a planning retreat for members of Minnesota organizations serving various constituencies to collaborate on planning their legislative agenda for the 1999 session of the Minnesota Legislature. This group had a history of conflict and competition on legislative issues. The retreat required planning for the involvement of all stakeholders and creating a process.for building consensus among representatives of groups who often compete for legislative funding. The facilitator's challenge was to help the group identify common goals and objectives while assisting participants in understanding the issues of each individual organization and the importance of maintaining the integrity of each organization's legislative goals and objectives. Curriculum/Instruction _ Parent -Preferences for Elementary Magnet School, Focus Group Study, Wayzata Public Schools; Wayzata, Minnesota The Wayzata Public Schools needed to determine how to use available space to provide additional program options for elementary students. Some in the community had expressed - a preference for a foreign language magnet and district officials wanted to sample "stakeholder opinion. A random sample of parents, staff members and other community stakeholders was identified to participate in six focus groups. A summary of findings and. recommendations was prepared and presented to administrators and the School Board for planning. ' . Program Design for New Middle School Building, Waconia Public Schools; Waconia, Minnesota A team of teachers and architects was charged with the responsibility for designing the program that would dictate the space design in the middle school. The consultant designed the process by which the team would reacXconsensus on program design elements and facilitated the group to its final decisions.. TThhe result was a report to the Superintendent and the building design team. - Donald S alverd a & A ssociates Roseville Professional Center • Suite 511 • 2233 N. Harn ine Avenue • Roseville, MN 55113 (612) 484 -1335 January 15, 1999 Mr. `Woody" Love Mayor City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55334 Dear Woody: Congratulations on being elected Mayor. Thank you for the call and invitation to meet with you to discuss a possible consulting assignment centering around the performance evaluation of the city administrator. Per your request, enclosed is biographic information and support information that describes who I am and what I do. look forward to visiting with you further on the phone regarding the specifics of your request. Thank you again for the call. Sincerely yours, Don Salverda Constulant JE rC �\ 1GCC ' I JAol z e,�y I g�� WHAT WE CAN DO FOR YOU 4DFRSHIP RFTP Designing and facilitating highly participative lead- ership, team building, strategic planning, and goal - setting retreats. Time frames range from half -day to three days in length. Most retreats ore held off -site. ORKSHOPS AND SFMINAR Open enrollment, organization -sponsored, and in- house workshops and seminars on a variety of topics designed to enhance participant leadership, man- agement and people skills. Time frames range from half -day to full day in length. MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Comprehensive management assessment and devel- opment program coupled with follow -up workshops and group discussion sessions. A variety of easy -to- administer personal and organi- zational development tools and instruments. Train - the- Trainer services available. CONSULTING Individual and Organization consulting assignments on request. DONALD SALVERDA DONALD SAIVERDA brings over thirty years of practical experience from the corporate, government, small business and volunteer sectors. He has designed and led team building, strategic planning, leadership and management retreats and workshops for over ten years for a variety of organizations in both the pub- lic and private sectors. Don is highly respected for his leadership ability, his results- oriented style, his commitment of service to people, and his positive and effective approach as a retreat and workshop facilitator. DONALD SALVERDA AND ASSOCIATES is a management consulting firm that provides services and materials to business and industry, government, and profes- sional organizations in the areas of team building, strategic planning, and leadership and management development. CLIENT COMMENTS ► "The City Council and I have been rerp pleased with The retreats you have conducted for the City. You were able to be vert sensitive to wbere the council teas coating from and bow to translate that to City Staff and to provide a useful bridge between Council thinking and staff thinking. CITY MANAGER ► 'Don's organizational skills. bunor and enthusiasm were of invaluable assistance to its as tre developed a coherent set of goals for the County. Tbis, of itself, was a maior and significant accomplishment for urn• diverse, 27- member Board. Dart s work is much appreciated by our board and its staff. " BOARD CHAIR ► "Thank you for introducing nme to the new Development Needs InventotylEffective Alanagenment Program that we are itstmg as part of our ongoing management development program. i ant most pleased with the completeness of pour program, Your assistance in getting its started or The s) your follow -up ... and, most important, with the impact The system is having on our managers. " CORPORATE EXECUTIVE ► "The 'Issues and Opportunities Workshop* that you • conducted for our Cite has turned out to be a mile- stone event. It has given a positive direction for the City, Chamber, Council and staff to follow. Your unique leadership skills helped create a cohesive and positive working relaliotship among 82 people in a very short line frame. I'm sore pour input helped its produce the nmaximunn impact on our City." CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT ► "1 wanted to write on behalf of the City Council to congratulate you and to tell yon hoc successful we feel the workshop was. iVot only did we learn a lot on communication, but we learned a lot about our- selves. Our hope is to continue to draw on the knowledge you have provided its. " MAYOR DON SALVERDA Don Salverda is President of DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES, a consulting firm that provides services and materials to business and industry, government, professional organizations, and to education in the areas of team building, strategic planning, leadership, and management development. He has designed and led team building, strategic planning, leadership, and management retreats and workshops for over fifteen years for a variety of organizations in both the public and private sectors. As a retreat and workshop leader his positive and enthusiastc approach convey his own sense of purpose and belief. He fiuther believes that: 1) People are very busy with limited time, therefore, the process should be practical and highly productive 2) People learn from each other, therefore, the process should be highly participative 3) The process should be educational, enjoyable, and non - threatening Don is highly respected for his leadership ability, his results - oriented style, and his commitment of service to people. Combining an academic background in engineering with over thirty years of practical experience in the private, public, and volunteer sectors in a variety of roles and settings, Don has gained a unique and broad perspective of the challenges facing organizations and individuals. In addition to serving on a number of boards and commissions, he has served as President of the Sales and Marketing Executives of Minneapolis, the Roseville - Falcon Heights Chamber of Commerce, the Association of Minnesota Counties, the Ramsey County League of Local Governments, the North Suburban Community Foundation and the North Suburban Gavel Association. He has also served as President of the Roseville Jaycees and as District Chair of the Indianhead Council of the Boy Scouts of America. He has been elected to public office and served eighteen years on the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners. Don is an active member of the Rotary Club of Roseville and is an avid downhill skier and biker. Donald Salverda & Associates Roseville Professional Center • Suite 511 • 2233 N. Hamlin Avenue • Roseville, MN 55113 (612) 484 -1335 ABOUT DONALD SALVERDA 6 ASSOCIATES DONALD SALVERDA 6 ASSOCIATES is a management consulting firm that provides services and materials to business and industry, government, and professional organizations in the areas of team building, strategic planning, leadership, and management development. OUR MISSION Our mission is to enhance the leadership and management knowledge and skills of individuals and organizations to enable them to be more effective in an ever - changing world. ABOUT DON SALVERDA Don Salverda brings over thirty years of practical experience from the corporate, government, small business and volunteers sectors. Don is highly respected for his leadership ability, his results- oriented style, his commitment of service to people, and his positive and effective approach as a retreat and workshop facilitator. OUR SERVICES • Leadership Retreats For Boards and Councils and High Performance Teams Designing and facilitating highly participative leadership, team building, strategic planning, and goal- setting retreats. Time frames range from half -day to three days in length. Most retreats are held off -site. • Workshops and Seminars Open enrollment, organization- sponsored, and in -house workshops and seminars on a variety of topics designed to enhance participant leader- ship, management, and people skills. Time frames range from half -day to full day in length. • Management Development Comprehensive management assessment and development program coupled with follow -up workshops and group discussion sessions. • Materials A variety of easy -to- administer personal and organizational development tools and instruments. Train- the - Trainer services available. • Individual Consulting One -on -one consulting on an hourly basis for managers, designed to enhance manager effectiveness. How to build a more effective Board or Council. r1ate "The City Council and that yself have been very sed with the retreats you conducted for the City. re able to be very sensi- here the Council was m and how to trans- to City Staff and to provide a useful bridge between Council thinking and staff thinking." City Manager "I wanted to write on behalf of the City Council to congratulate you and to tell you how successful we feel the workshop was. Not only did we learn a lot on. communication, but we learned a lot about ourselves. Our hope is to continue to draw on the knowledge you have provided us." Mayor "The 'Team Building Workshops' you have conducted for our County were very successful. Not only have the policymakers and top managers of the County received a wealth of new information about themselves and their leadership styles, they have also learned how to transfer that knowledge into more positive perceptions and work relations with one another." County Administrator Donald Saiverda & Associates (Leadership & Management Devek)pment) Don Saiverda • Facilitator - Retreats Roseville Professional Center - Workshops 2233 N. Hemline Avenue • Consultant Roseville, MN 55113 • Materials (612) 484 -1335 "Don's organizational skills, humor and enthusiasm were of invaluable assistance to us as we developed a coherent set of goals for the County. This, of itself, was a major and significant accomplishment for our diverse, 27- member Board. Don's work is much ap- preciated by our Board and its staff." Board Chair "The'lssues and Opportunities Workshop' that you conducted for our City has turned out to be a milestone event. It has given a positive direction for the City, Chamber, Council and staff to follow. Your unique leadership skills helped create a cohesive and positive work- ing relationship among 82 people in a very short "time frame. I m sure your input helped us produce the maximum impact on our City." Chamber of Commerce President •01/20/1999 18:00 6129889350 ALLEN PAGE 02 ALLEN c� ASSOCIATES 4749 Coventry goad Ease Minnetonka. MN 5345 T4: Shorewood City Council FROM: Tom Allen, President, Allen & Associates SUBJECT: .Proposal to find eommon ground regarding evaluation of toe city administrator. DATE: January 25, 1998 This proposal is being submitted at your request and based upon a brief conversation with mayor Woody Dove. By my understanding, there appeared to be agreement in the past among city council members and with the city administrator regarding his performance expectations. However, those involved have recently become aware that there has not been real undm tan.ding and agreement' in the past, and that there is definitely not agreement today. Do I have that right? Proposed resaft (by the end of this project, city council members and the city administrator will have - achieved the following objectives): 1. Matuuua l understanding among city council members and with the city administrator regarding past and current points of view about expectations. 2. Agreement among city council members: Regarding the general direction in which the city is heading, and its implications for the role of city administrator. On a job description for the city administrator's position. On criteria and a process for evaluating the city adm4listrator's position. 3. Evaluation of the current city administrator and agreement on next steps. Are these the. results that you want from this project? proposed action plan to achieve results - phase one - assessment: (in tens of consultant responsibilities; I . Deluxe parameters for the project with the city council. (in process) 2. Condwt one hour interviews with each city council member and the city administrator by phone. 3. Develop a written summary: Where is there common ground and where is there not yet agreement regarding beast, current, and fixture performance expectations? Development of a proposed approach to fully achieve the project results. 4. Evaluation of the written report in a meeting with the mayor. Review of the written report in a separate meeting with the city admirdstmtor. 5. Evaluation of the written report in a joint meeting of the council and the administrator. Commitment (YIN) to proceed to phase two. FAX 612- 988 -9350 PHON5 612-968-9332 E -mail: AllenAso'macl.com 01/20/1999 18:00 6129889350 ALLEN PACE `03` Page ? Proposer!` action plan lo fully achieve project results - phase two: (in terms of consultant responsibilities) 1. Cotmiete any remaining steps as outlined and approved by the council in phase one report. Proposed .Project Investment: Your investment in consuking fees will be Phase one Assessn Phase two Full achievement of project results 53,000., plus travel and out of pocket costs. As proposed and approved in phase . one sumardry @ $1,000. per day, plus travel and out of pocket costs. Recent Pertinent Experience: 1. Facilitated evaluation of the city rnamger of St. Louis Park in partnership with the St- Louis Park City Council. 2. Facilitated teambuilding process among Robbinsdale School Board and with District Administration Team. -01/ 18:00 6129889350 ALLEN PAGE 04 BIOGRAPHY THOMAS C. ALIEN is President of Allen & Associates. W. Allen provides 'organization development consulting services. He serves as a facilitator for organizations, groups, and individuals to transfcirm challenges into breakthrough results. He does this -through the use of whole systems dialogue for action and leadership coaching. Typical engagements include: strategic planning and visioning, organization• and cultural change, conflict management, building collaborative teams, and executive coaching. He serves clients in both the corporate and not for profit sectors. 1;_it an' executive leadership capacity, Mr. Allen has served as Vice Presiaienx For Corporate Development for Augsburg Fortress, Publishers, "where he designed, planned, and led a large scale organizations change effort to support a new strategic direction. His. responsi`tsikties included strategic planning, Total Quality Management; and organizational change. At Bluff Medical Center, he served as ' Chief Operating Officer, where he directed all planning, marketing; financial, and general management activities. Ina consulting capacity, he has 12 years of experience.' Mr. Allen has been - president of his own consulting firm for 8 years. He was a Senior Man4ger with Nankin SchnoIl & Co., a midwest regional consulting firm, where he led a team of professionals to serve clients in , multiple consulting roles. At Price Waterhouse & Co., an intertational public accounting firm, he counseled the firm's* clients in the areas of specialized services, auditing, and taxation. Mr. Allen was certified as a public accountant in the state of Wiscong -- n in 1978. He has been an instructor for the American Management Association (both the General Management Division - and the President's Association). He has served as guest lecturer at the University. Of Wisconsin -- Eau Claire. Mr. Allen is certified as an instructor- and- facilitator for 3M Company's process for Managing Total Quality. He is an active member in the 'Twin West Chamber of. Commerce, serving on the business education partnership advisory committee and as Chairman of the Minnetonka business council.