111698 CC Ws AgP
(S) r
lS)
-\
N "\:
...
~ O~~ ~ [J) 0 k .j.J >.'1-1 ,.rl
g~a Q) OJ (\} JJ :>. ;:1 0 :::J JJO U
:;J .... ;:J (\} H JJ 0 JJ 0 'M 1tI 0
~OOO '1-1 II) m'M ". JJ -n >. 4l H.Q ri(\} 4l ~
~ II) ;>. '0 t: JJ .tl U U 1II .Q Ol Al 1tI :::J Ol
tl1 'M ~.J ~ 0 t: 0 (\} 0 <U JJ lJl '0 :::Jr-l k,Q Q)
O~f-t ~'H 'M I1l PI dl 0 ~ (\} JJ .... ~ ". 'M - O'11l OJJ>
~H~ ..... O.u u OJ ~ ,Q .u k Ok 0l,Q > ex. 4-111
rl :::J {/)Ol(\} (\} (\} .u .u 0 Sa I=ltn IV
Iilt~ r-l ;>. 0 H t: ~~.Q H 'tl !Jl ~ t: 1tI 0 0,'" ,Qr-I 0
(\J 0.u.Q;:10 JJ 0 :::J 0 lJl (\} R1 0. u.Q JJR1 . :::J
(S) Olil 0."" I1l 0 -rl rl .Q 0 0 n m (\} '0 :>0 k m >. 0
n. ~~ U ;>.t:I1l'l-l 00 :>, ~ -n 0 ~ 0 UH :::J.u '0 Q) ('. <U .u ;>.
['- 1tI 10 .rl:;lO (1j U r-l 0 'n 0 o I1l ~t:k U-r-!
\.0 Q) .j.J Q) o.'tl t: .g k 1tI U U ,Q t: ;>. .C: III (\) 0 -n ri4-l
... Hfil -.Q t: 10 O.r-! OJ -rl 0 '~I ::1 H ;:1 - ~ tnO ~~H ('.
Oil: ..uQ):::J >m .Q OJ ..Q 0 ~.~ .g~ :>0 0. 10
'tl 'd III H -n .... '0 0) 00 Q) CII .Q III (IJ ClIO' .u
JJ :>,.... u ;:l '0 J.! ClI J.! ;:J E .t:l o III 0 p,,.rl k m ('. ClI
H,Q{/)1Il0~1Il :> :::J t: lJl 0 ''0 lJl U'I-I -m JJ.Q lllH <U
dJ..Q :>c.... e .rI .lJ 'n l1J U ;>'0 .01 m :::J ;>..c: 0 ~I
-'tl H S r-I ;:1 .rl !-1 0 III '1-1;>' III - .0 III - ./J.j.J0 U
mill t:t:r-l::l 4-l 41 (J) -r-! .c t: Ori 1Il,Q >../J H .r-! PI Vl
01 q lH lll'''' ri 1II ;:l 4-l II) ./J UJ.! t: ktn llI.rl UClI
U-MO~ nl g, (\} -r-! ;:l t: 0 ~ CII .0 m.... 1O H III ./Jk ;>.
k III Al 'tl >.~ .c: ri 0 ClI ~:2 11l .t:l CII 4-l ~ Rl 0 ./J
;:1 JJ dJ JJ ClI .j.J .-1 fil U -r! E ~ - t: ~:::J>. III k .n
OCllr-l URlO{/} m 4-1 I-l Ol -r! tn .0 <U'O ~?;' m.o '1-1 - U
lIIkPltnfll.c:OP ~ t: 0 (J} ./J .u.... ./J m 0 JJ >. r-l 'OH
ClI Ss:lOJu oc:( 'r! ('. 1II III t:V 0 k OJ t: III rl.... ('. t:
po: I=l III'M k '- tll ,Q >.k ./J OJ t: Ol r-Itn ;:t :> (\. :>''0 0 ;:till IV 0
(\}lIIQJGl;:1rl tn .wO .j.J Ol <U III ..Q ~ ./Jri 4-I.olH~ U rI
If) 1=l<U .o.uOIll~ 1II s:l -r! 0 m ~~ '..-1 ~I , ;:t<U.o k::l - .o~ li1 .r-! tn
W O..Q E t: >"r! 0 ~I .0 rio, 0 tn .u CIIu OJ '.Q r-I GJ.o'tI ;>'8 :> s::
If) .... .olO......lJZ 113 r-I III S t: JJ s::t: P.~ .0 .u;:1,-lfCtl H-r!
~ III QJ 'tl -..-1 OJ t: Ql g.~ .... 0 lJl VOl :>,.0 ~ o 0 m.ooF:< OJ.t:l
'n:>1=l V~OlO ;>. ~ QJ ~ .oJJ t: lJlr-l .Q.u H - tn 'r! :>. 0 0 lOU
If) U- lIl:>Ok '00 .r:: .u 0 ,-l k Ql o.Ol r-I ~ ./J
W Ol Q) H Ql Rll1J....~ ~ .c: Ol .u ri I1l I-l \l.l (\} nl'O> ::- - H ,..... .c:nl
~ O~ ~ 111'1-1 ..QI-l r-I co Ql JJ .c:u 01 0 41'n .u IIlQl'tl uo.
z III 4-l I1l s::: I1l - ./J .rl III 0 .,1 -r! III JJ~ o 0 ~I ,Q<uS::: .QO U
0 4-1 ;:1'H O' E 'tl I1l -rl 4-1 .uu 4IJ :.: .0 UU4IJ ;:1 .u 0 . 1tI'tl
If) 1.0 0 ..c:OJmOU'O t:: <U'I-I H QJ .c:4IJ 4IJr-I OQJtn. ('. P,t:
.... rl m.u JJ.w <U ~ Al U ~ III ri tn . III .u' Uk 'HHr-l ;>'.c . s:: tOl1l
lJ "4' .r!.... (\} l/) :>'JJ 0 .u 113;>' r.: ,Q III t:: >..Q 111' .r! 0 ~ V \l.l ~ ' . .0 (,Prl
W l!l r-I~.c: ./JrlH ,Q l1J kr-l '..1 .u (\}O.u.lJlll H ~,QO 'tl;:1U '0 .u.o 'n t: '0 k
0 l!l 0 8'tlt:JJ.o t: .c HH-rl'r-!rl III OOrl .r! 0 >l 1ll111t:l/) .u 0 -r!
00 P.~ @IllUo. ;>. ~ ('. ::l 0 JJ 4-l .uU(\}O ::l.j.J t: 1O :>. (\} 4IJEiD U .r-! ;>. m
\D ~ IIlI1l ::=.rI OJ rl .o'tl 0 0 I1l 1II tLC: os:: 0s:l.j.J I=l H rl;>' OJ.j.JUPo
'J! OlOJ ~I H Q) dO >. ' ;:1 4-l ::= ;>'Q) 1II.... III o lIllll rlr-llll .j.JUt:Q)
... !3t:~ J:1Po;>'I1lH.u .u 0 'tI 0 .c r-fQ)01ll '1j -rl .Q UQ)III O,-lGIOJ OOJQlH
~ dlOUQ) 0] Q) 113 III ~ '0.0 :>. U (\. III > :> Al '0 'rl H m) U .j.JQ)U H.utn
0;:1 -r-! 'r! :> .Q e lJlOl r-l0 -M to 01 III ..u III r-ltO ltI 4J GJ ;:t'rI 11l .j.J~.j.J o.OH.u
(Tl 000 ~ 0 U '.1 ''0 ...-1 t: H :::JtJJ .0 .d lJl4-l.t:l III ,r:: 1O ::l III o.xe otGl 0) Q)0l ~Q)C:
N
... gIUOJ W JJ Olrl..--I X .rl 0 0 '0 :;: I=l Gl rn o ~ Sill a :>. U ~Q) :::J Vo.SGJ
\.0 'r! SC: GlRlI=lO)r-I 0 .r:.r:: ~ ~ .r-! HH ~ H ~ OJJlll Gl 'r-l 'r! m Ql 'M U (II S
J:1r-f - -..-I 'tl.Q .u o.c:.r-! H .um .j.J .u ~rl ;>. '0 t: tl r::0lt> r-f1llR1 .rl GJ GJ
ZRlO H 0 .u C:.r! ~ Po :;: r.: III ::=0) Q} JJ :=: 0 0 :>. ' III H III - r-fH.-4t>
ovo. 'tl.o <UU4J !J: {JJ s:: OGJ ,Q o Q) . '.0 ..r! 00 c:.uv ,Q :>. V '{j,-l0l~ 0..... rI III
HOrn -Gl~tnl1l{JJ..QGJ 1Cl~ .r-I ::Crl ~ (\. ZlHoc:(Pl.uUO tt: :J tn H ~I tJJ :J;.j.JlIl ,-lo.UO tllrt.mtll
m GJ OJJGJs:lV4J r-f r-I ;>. OJ r.: Q) Rl .... ;:t -r! ...-1
Hoor.: r-I nj H.r! ~ tJJri Po Q) Ol ltI H -... Pd-l U:>. o - r. r.:
UNJ:: r-I U 0 0 0. t11rl E .> . U .'tl ,0 t> o Q} .l.J :=: Q) 1'..-1
liI rl ...-1 (lJ o.t:l III (II ;j'rll1l rl N...-t C<)X "". 0 If\ I.O.Q 0 t- H :> ro (H.r-! J:1OJo. mOrlC'l
QC<)~ :I: rl m 4-l ~l Ol ~ {JJ rl III JJ 00 ~ p,m o U HOlllO ....rlrl
6129296166 DECISION RESll.JRSES
167 P03
JUL 30 '98 12:01
13. Animal control?
14. Building inspection?
15. Street lighting?
16. Park and recreational facilities?
17. Snow removal?
18. Other than voting, do you feel that if you wanted to, you
could have a say about the way the City of Shorewood runs things?
19. How much do you feel you know about the work of the Mayor
and City Council -- a great deal, a fair amount, or very little?
20. From what you know, do you approve or disapprove of the job
performance of the Mayor and City Council? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE)
And do you feel strongly that way?
IF OPINION STATED, ASK:
21. Why do you feel that way?
22_ How much first-hand contact have you had with the City Staff
-- quite a lot, some, very little, or none at all?
23. From what you know, how would you rate the job performance
of the City Staff -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
IF RATING IS GIVEN, ASK:
24. Why did you rate city staff as
?
25. During the past year, have you contacted by telephone or in
person any Shorewood City staff member?
IF "YES," ASK:
26. On your last contact with City staff, which department
did you reach -- Police, Fire, Finance, Planning, Building In-
spection, Public Works and Engineering, Parks and Recreation,
Code enforcement office, the Information Desk, Motor.Vehicle
Licensing, or Administration?
Thinking about 'that last contact, for each of .the fol-
lowing characteristics, please rate the Roseville City staff
as excellent, good, only fair, or poor...~
27.
28.
29.
help you?
30. Efficiency of the department staff?
31. Courtesy of the department staff?
Changing topics....
Courtesy of the Information Desk receptionist?
Waiting time for service?
Ease of reaching a department staff member who could
2
..
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
167 P04
JUL 30 '98 12:01
32. Would you favor or oppose the City placing utility lines
underground? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that way?
_ The cost of placing utility lines underground would be reflected
in an increase in your monthly utility bill.
33. How much would you be willing to see your utility bill
increase to fund placing utility lines underground. Let's say,
would you be willing to pay an additional $___ per month?
(CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING POINT i MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON
RESPONSE) How about $___ per month? (REPEAT PROCESS)
Moving on....
34. In general, do you feel that the City is enforcing city
codes and ordinances at about the right level, is too exacting,
or is not rigorous enough?
IF "TOO ElXACTING," "NOT RIGOROUS ENOUGH," OR "VARIES," ASK:
35. what codes or ordinances do you feel are not being en-
forced at about the right level?
Moving on... .
For each following types of residential development, please tell
me if you think the City of Shorewood has the right amount, too
much or too little....
36. Affordable housing?
37. Senior housing?
38. Luxury housing?
39 . Apartments?
40. "Starter" housing for first-time buyers?
4~. Would you favor or oppose the City changing the zoning laws
to allow for more high density development, such as senior hous-
ing? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that way?
Snowmobiling is currently permitted in Shorewood....
42. Do you or anyone in your household own a snowmobile?
43. Would you support or oppose banning snowmobiles within city
limits?
44. Would you support or oppose banning snowmobiles on the
regional trail?
IF "SUPPORT IN EITHER QUESTION, ASK:
45. Why do you feel that way?
3
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
167 PeS
.
JUL 30 '98 12:02
45. Within the past two years, do you think crime in your neigh-
borhood has increased, decreased, or remained about the same?
Changing directions. . . .
As you may ~~ow, nearly 40 percent of Shorewood residents are
currently using City water.
47. How satisfied are you with the current voluntary water
system -- very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied
or not at all satisfied?
48. Should the water system be expanded to include all residenc-
es within the city?
IF "YES," ASK:
49. Should the system remain voluntary, or not?
The cost of expanding the water system would be reflected in the
affected property owners' tax bill.
50. How much would you be willing to see your property tax
increase to fund expansion of the water system. Let's say, would
you be willing to pay an additional $_ per month? (CHOOSE
RANDOM STARTING POINTi MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON RESPONSE) How
about $___ per month? (REPEAT PROCESS)
Turning to park and recreation issues.....
51. Overall, would you rate the park and recreational facilities
in Shorewood as excellent, good, only fair or poor?
52. Do you or members of your household regularly leave the City
of Shorewood to use leisure-time recreational facilities or
programs in other cities because of their unavailability here?
(IF "YES," ASK:) What types of leisure-time facilities or pro-
grams?
53. How much would you be willing to see your property tax
increase to fund a park bond referendum. Let's say, would you be
willing to pay an additional $___ per month? (CHOOSE RANDOM
STARTING POINT; MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDrNG ON RESPONSE) How about
$_ per month? (REPEAT PROCESS)
Suppose the City of Shorewood proposed a bond referendum for land
preservation, park, trail and recreational improvements. Improve-
ments would include
Residents would be asked to approve a million dollar bond
referendum to fund these improvements.~e average homeowner
would an increase of property taxes of about $____ monthly on a
$ home.
4
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
167 P06
JUL 30 '98 12:02
54. If the election were today, would you favor or oppose this
bond referendum? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that
way?
IF A RESPONSE IS GIVEN, ASK:
55. Why do you feel that way?
Moving on....
56. What is your primary source of information about City
government and its activities?
The City publishes a newsletter, "
each home.
" sent to
57. Do you receive the newsletter?
IF "YES," ASK:
58. How much of the newsletter do you usually read -- all
of it, most of it, some of it, not too much of it, or none of it?
59. How would you evaluate its format
only fair, or poor?
excellent, good,
50. How would you evaluate its content -- excellent, good,
only fair, or poor?
61. Does your household receive cable television?
IF "YES," ASK:
62. How often do you watch Shorewood City Council Meetings
on the access ch~1nel, frequently, occasionally, rarely, or not
at all?
IF Th"'EY WATCH, ASK:
63. Are there any changes or improvement you would make to
improve the t~lecast of the meetings?
"
64. If you could chobse the best way for you to receive informa-
tion about City government and the issues facing the commu-
nity, what would it be?
65. Do you currently own a home computer? (IF "YES," ASK:) Do
you use a modem on your home computer?
IF THEY HAVE A MODEM OR "YES/YES," ASK:
IF THEY DO NOT HAVE A MODEM GO TO QUESTION
Which of the following computer resources on the Internet
have you used through your modem?
5
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
167 P07
JU.. 3ej , 98 12: 03
66. Electronic mail, or e-mail?
67. Subscriber newsgroups?
sa. The World Wide Web?
69. Have you visited the City of Shorewood's homepage on the
World Wide Web? (IF "YES," ASK:) Are there any changes or im-
provements you would suggest?
Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes....
Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following
age groups live in your household. Letls start with the oldest.
Be sure to include yourself.
70. First, persons 65 or over?
71. Adults under 65?
72. School-aged or pre-school children?
73. What is your occupation and, if applicable, the occupation
of your spouse or partner?
74. Do you own or rent your present residence?
75. What is your age, please?
76, What is the last grade of school you completed?
And now, for one final question, keeping in mind that your
answers are held strictly confidential....
77. Could you tell me your approximate pre-tax yearly household
income. Does the income lie....
78. Gender
79. PRECINCT
6
CITY OF SHORE'WOOD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 1998
COUNCIL CHAlYIBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CO~-vENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers O'Neill and Garfunkel: Planning Direcror Brad
Nielsen.
Absent:
Councilmembers Stover and Champa; Administrator Hunn
B.
Review Agenda
Mayor Dahlberg reviewed the Agenda for August 3. 1998. The agenda was approved as
submitted.
2. DISCUSSION ON POLICY SURVEY QDESTIONS
Tne Council reviewed and discussed a draft of che Policy Survey which was prepared by Decision
Resources. Bill Morris and Diane Tra'der of Decision Resources were in attendance to discuss the
proposed survey.
Councilmember Garfunkel noted a Parks survey was justrecentIy completed and did not feel
questions related to parks would need to be included. Mayor Dahlberg noted his agreement.
Wi!:h respect to Questions 36 through 40, Mayor Dahlberg felt., as a policy maker, the question is
whether these items should be involuntary. He stated his belief the crucial policy questions revolve
around whether residents would be in favor of forcing a particular policy on a neighborhood which
is opposed to it and he requested questions be included relative to this.
.
Councilmember GarfunkeI stated anomer issue would be whether residents are willing to pay for a
particular policy in order to have it implemented.
Ms. Traxler questioned whether there are feasibility' issues. Mayor Dahlberg did not feel there is
an all or nothing .position and explained the current water system is voluntary and. !:he Council
supports neighborhoods which come in with petitions for watennain extension.
Councilmember Garfunkel commented with respect to Question No.3 the answer can be very
subjective in that a person's view of their quality of life could fluctuate from day to day.
Mayor Dahlberg recalled this particular question was asked on the park survey 'and questioned
whether it needs to be asked again. Ms. Tra.'der will review this and if it was included in the park
survey, it will be deleted from this one.
rvIr. Morris noted this question was used in another city and was followed up with anQ[her
quesIion relative to what change or improvement could be made by the City to raise the quality of
lire from whatever their response had been. for exarnpie. good to exceHenr or fair to good. Ms.
Traxler srared a draft question will be included in (he next sur;ey for (he Council's revie'.v.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING l\Illl'fUTES
AUGUST 3, 1998 . PAGE :z
Ms. Traxler requested the removal of Question No. 6 given Question No. 5 which she felt to be
more quantitative to what the Council is looking for.
Mayor Dahlberg reviewed Question No. 5 and suggested asking a measure of importance to
determine how important this issue is to the respondent.
NIr. Morris suggested asking the respondent what percentage of their property ta.;<es go to the City.
He explained this will demonstrme their perception of how their property taxes are distributed, The
caller will then be able to inform the respondent the percentage of their property taxes which
actually go to the City. . This is then followed up with Question No.7 which is a comparison with
nearby suburban areas. Ms. Traxler noted most residents in suburban areas greatly over esti..rnate
the City's share of the property taxes and greatly under estimate the school district's share.
With respect to Question Nos. 9 through 17, Councilmember Garfunkel questioned how, for
example, a determination will be able to be made relative to street lights and whether the respondent
feels !:here is insufficient or excessive lighting. Ms. TIllXler suggested a follow up question in the
event a respondent answers "fair" to a particular item.
Councilmember O'Neill suggested adding "traffic control" to this list. Ms. Traxler felt perhaps this
should be handled as a separate question since this is a current issue in the City. Mr. Morris
suggested asking whether there are concerns relative to traffic control such as speed, automobiles
and stop signs.
NIr. Morris suggested either deleting Question No. 18 or. if it is to be included, asking a follow up
question to ascertain why the respondent feels the way they answered. Councilmember Garfunkel
would like to know the residentS' perception of their ability to come forward and voice their
opinions and the reception they receive from the City.
Ms. Traxler pointed out Question No. 19 will be cross tabulated with Question No. 20 and this
will provide information to determine whether chose who are most unhappy with the City are also
the least knowledgeable abou~. the City or whether the reverse is true.
,
,
Councilmember Garfunkel noted it is anticipated this survey will be completed post election. He
felt if a survey of this type were to be completed in a non-election year. it would allow for
corrective action to be taken by the CoUncil.
Ms. Traxler suggested an article be included in the newsletter notifying residents a survey is being
completed and letting them know Decision Resources: has been retained to assess general artirudes
relative to policy issues in the city. They should also be informed telephone numbers are randomly
selected and then asked to cooperate should they be one of the households which is called. She
stated this will make for a smoother survey process.
With respect to Question No. 26, "parks and recreation" and "code enforcement office" will be
deleted and "information desk" will be changed to reflect "general information desk."
In reviewing Question No. 33, ;\[r. Morris stared he will contact NSP to determine whether c.here is
an estimated amount which could be inserted in this question.
With respect to Question No. 37, Mayor Dahlberg remarked while a resident may be in favor of
senior housing, it is important to determine whether or not they would be in favor of forcing senior
housing on a neighborhood which is strongly opposed to it.
V)
~
E-<
j:;>
Z
S
..>.;
r."
Z
H
[-<
~
~
.....
~
z
o
H
V)
~f')
V)w
~r."
~~
OP-.
~.
~~
HCl'I
Ur-i
Z .,
Of')
0[-<
UV)
j:;>
~0
tj:;>
U~
VI V
rn -5.'::l
..c::~o
UVL..O
~-B"d
.~~
..: ~ 8-
u -n 0..
vd)O
~ -'< :>..
~ ~ ';1,
c:l
o v';:1
L..O.D ~
-n c::-'
GoI V V
b/l-9 ~
:=3 u r.
.d"5 ~
u 0 0
_UV)
-:t c::'-
0.0
O'::1.U
..... VI.a
,r~ ~ ~
c:: 0'-0
o 0
'0 0.. 0
V) :::l c::
~ ~ ....
cyo..8
::::-.1:4
d) ,0 bll
~ ::: 'GJ
-... r:::
-0 rn
--t ~ c::
::3 U 0
0....
~ I\.).~
. -.1:4
V bll'~
.c c:: bfJ
..... r::
-n ~.....
V 011)
~.c 0
.... 0..
'" ... El
0......
:::l . -- '-'
...... c:: 0
Zv ~ ;>
_-.. ... ,C':S
o bO......
c::-o
..... .,...., --.
V VI ::3
..0::30
sE ~
V .....
,gvc::
-v
..... -g"O
U"O c::
c:: .... 0
::300.
o l+'< V)
U'-l-4v
rn ....
v"o
-Bg
c::.....
V c::
;> V
'!)'I) 8
V) OJ
~ ~n
.0 C'j
o VI
~:B
0-0
r.:: ~
V) 0
9 c::
bl)
V ..
;> V
'0.0
~~
~O
V) '-'
c:: 0
.g >.
V).,g
~ .:?-.
tr .
V OJ
-08
E.!~
u
r::~
...... ~
9(--0
~v
vr;:l
Cl-O
V 0
.!:l S .
L..O~-o
-no~
V c:: V
5C/J'U
. ::1 v-o
V) -9 v
~ ',,-, .0
0'0 Vl
~t:o
,~ o.g
v 0.. V)
Zvv
. ....;:l
O-otr
~ g ~
..0 :>.. 0
Sv-5
~(:;-o
~;:l Q.)
~ ,..1').......
U .... VI
o 0 ~o
::3 OJ bfJ
o U ::3
u~v)
'v
~-5
.....
4V1 ~'...... ~
'S: 0 0
~ o'g
ov
~:g ~
-oc::c::
--<Q.)v
~ ~'e
V) 0 Q.)
vUo..
;:l ~ ~
~ 0
...., v S
~-9C'j
:.coQ.)
0'-'.0
E!v-o
~ .f; ::t
o(<:jo
r:: -. ~
Vl~Vl
~c:::a
o
""'a~
.9.......~
o p..:::l
0. 0 .....
..... L.. V
ro .;;~ Z
f~b
~l1~
-o5s
Q.) -0 Q.)
.g'@~
~ bO g
g,.~ 0
v'~U
~ -0 oj
~ Q.) 8
t ..... 0
~u..
o gg~
~. ::3 ~
~Vlf--t
s~~
s1fg
~~~ s
g '" ~
::3 . 0
o ~ c:
u~!/)
~-o
OJ--<
:> ::3
OJ 0
~.~
OV)
..00
..0
VI';j
;>-..V)
OJ OJ
(:;g.
:::l
, " OJ
VI
e Q.)
8-5
u?~
.S P.
6h
-orn
Q.)
1]~
-U~
.S.~
1St!
'dg,
'3~
o
U V
V) 8
V 0
::aIL.
~~
g OJ
",r;:l
o -g >.
L..O OJ
~~(:;
.~ 0 g
-er7ilj
V) 'd ;:l
!5 ;j.~
. ::1 :>.. ca
~OJo.
g.~.~
vV)~
-B~El
'dOlO
OJ ~.t1
tIJ ....
bh V 1l
rn -B Q)
~c::v
~~'d
.=: '!)'I)E
C'j
c::
U
.0
.....
o
c:l
~
..0
OJ
.~
U
c::
tIJ
;>
'61,
\0
-:t
o
Z
o
o
.tj
b
&
tIJ
...
OJ
~
9
!";:1
U
o
;:l
o
U
Q.)
-9.
~.~
oU
gj.s
VI
~.S
V) v
5~
U.!!3
.s~
u
V)r+::
ro'a
~ bn
...... .....
~ VI
tIJ
~
..0
:>,
L:1
c::
~
::3
u
o
-c
~
l1
c::
~
.....
V)
~
blJ
c:l
.-
..0
.0
S
VI
V)
8
U
!;;:
o
z
o
.8 ..J
...........
~ tIJ
&~
VI
9:8
tIJ ...
:> 0
'l:j d)
ro~
~'>,
-011
~u
Vl ...
~o V
bo-B
;:l Q.)
Vl-C
bo ~
~-S
.0 .-
~~
O~
.... '"
o ~
~.~
'"::" 'rl
~u
jg
o
'::1
~
6.
bI)
.~
o
~
.-8
.s
'1;1
tIJ
.....
Vl
V
bO
bl)
g
-.
J
...
v
.0
8
OJ
El
.-.
'rl
U
c:l
::3
o
U
G'
'rl
U
~
..0
9
::1
o
;>,
....
..8
..
~
.S
t;j
o
u
C'-. v
C"-. u.s
.t:l ~ ~,
-S~o..
'[i .~. 8
-ou~
OJv,g
'+l~
. a ..Cl .g)
~ g'v
::3 .... Cl
o~S
>'Uo
IUQ.)>'
t:'. a -9 0)
~t:'. ~ >.B
~.~ V (<:j 0
~ .... ~ 0.......
e~~gg
'!~' ~ e' bO bl)
u _.~. ~ r:::
..... U' :=l
~ g, OJ. r;:l
;go~~~
::3 'd.!:l ;:l ::1
o .::l 0 0 C'-.
:>.. 0 0 ;>,:>.. b
8~;;~~ ;
,.-....,,-...,,-.....,,-....,~
.-. 01 f') ,t 'n
v
-B
~
o
0..
g-
V)
{j
c:l
o
.0
b
~
~
.., .J
u t:l
.ss
v Q)
~ m)
~.!!J
. bJ) j.:J
'U~
~ 0
.!{Cl
~]
o ...
U V
0.0
'n El
.Q.)
08..
Z~
u
g g
'l:j 0
~u
&8
~~
..~ ~,
V)
bo ....
~. Q.)
E~
~~
o~
.........
o.~
:>"c:l
'" ;:l
~8
~
n.
.....
t:l
0)
u
~
.s
.....
o
.....
ih
:.:::l
.9
-0
Q.)
...
Q.)
:g
.8
-0
-.
::l
o
U
(<)
In
]
f'l
'n
.-.
'n
'..,;
o
Z
o ,
0-0
'l:j Q.)
~a;
;:l......
CYS
.....0
-. u
..E
bll ~
.... ~
~-B
Ci1:d
Q~
'-':>"
o V
~t:
~~
::1 ~ V,)
0...... v
:>..~~
-011).....
.......8
go~
~~ 8.
:: . 8
. ..!:lo..
.g >-; .~
Vl- V
Q.) c., .s
2... ~ Q.)
...... '" :>
vv;",
-S (d. .0
'Ua9
~ '" bO
~ Cl.S
gg.~~
~.E v
S.~.o
OJE-o
!t 's .3
O~o
1-000-< ~
.E~~
8Q.)~
V M....
~ ~e1
gr:::ctfv
o~-B~
U6hg/#
. s q r:::
S'f1 ~ Q.)
.g ..0 0 ~)
c:lO..o
~99~
~El
~ .g .~ 'B
'dc:l~.o
6~~0
.ot~ r::: 9
ctfeo...
o 'ti'~ v
.....t:lv'E
...... 0 ;:l 0
~.o CT'
0.. rn ",.S
Vl v
e~vgJ
.r! 0 'd V
u o..;:l 1-0
...... o..-u u
~ ~.8.S
...
t8
Vl
o
o
'OJ
~o
bll
~
blJ
'S
V)
~
CT'
~
:>..
Q.)
~
V)
~
.E
11
1]
-.
U
.S
1S
r:::
o
......
V)
'S;
e
o.
ctf
~
-S
-0
JJ
~
~..;
..... V
~jl
OVl
.... ~
V V
.00
~.s
8M
;;:lc:l
~r~
o c::
u~
-~ ..c
G)..~
t:l ~
ao
-Co
u'l:j
V,) M
~'+-:i
u.~
M '"
v).
~:B
f3,-,
u 0
Q.) t:l
-So
';,::1
..... U
o .r!
~.a
::l c;I
V)
.~ Vl
Q.).
-Stj
.....tIJ
::l'd
o t:l
-fJ&
V)
1!le
t:l
Q.) Q.)
~-S
Vl
~g
bo ~
~'g
~-e
Eg
0'::1
~~
;:l ;:l
VlCT'
V ctf
..0 V
-o'd
Q.) ;:l
.....-
au
Vl.S v
b09.~
]v(:;
~~ ~
I"""\-o~
1-1 -< ..0
::l ('j
.... 0 U
o ~ 1-0
~ ....
'-4OJQ.)
~::r:-5
.....'"d
2 ~
'"d
6:a
~8
~ to
Q) ....;
-Ev
'-' 5
Q.).....
-B,s
Q.)
-CQ.)
~-s
.!.~ ~
~
o..c::
....g
'n ,,.,
\0 V)
.OJ
o.~
:Z.t
g ~
. i3l V
V ~
::3
CY t.
~'-S
..... ...
'Ev
0-5
~ V
~.~
~ iii
11 .'~
t:ig.o
~o~ ~
bl) ~
:::l 'Vl
Vl -0 -1::;
"--4' a __..'"
~~u
.E~.s
a SQ.)
oo~
.... U'l:j
J5Q.)::l
~ g ~.
El .c -9
r;:lC'j~
gll)-E
::l t:l v
o~-c
U 0 ~
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION iYIEETING MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1998 . PAGE 4
Councilmember O'Neill suggested induding :J. question relative to whether the respondem would
be interested in receiving e-mails from the City providing chem with perJnenr Cicy information.
With respect to communication. Mayor Dahlberg felt a major goal would be to send information
from Cicy Hall to neighborhood associations where it can be circulated throughout the
neighborhood to residents without e-mail.
Nfr. Morris stated Question No. 74 (b) will be included in the next draft in the event the respondent
owns cheir home so the value can be ascertained for purposes of cross tabbing.
Ms, Traxler stated a revised survey will be submitted to the Council by the end of the monch.
Mayor Dahlberg requested she also submit information relative to the cost associated wich
conducting a survey of this type on a regular basis. such as every other ye~.
O'Neill moved, GarfunkeI seconded recessing the meeting at 8:46 p.m. Motion
passed 3/0. Mayor Dahlberg reconvened the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
3. DISCUSSION ON CONDITIONAL USE PE:&.VrrTS FOR HOME
OCCUPATIONS
Planning Director Nielsen addressed this matter. He explained there are currently 27 J.irJ:lited home
occupation permits and 10 special home occupation permits in existence.
Councilmember O'Neill raised the issue of receiving e-mails at home from the work place and .
inquired what would constitute an in-home business.
Nielsen explained if the business being carried out at the residence is the resident's primary place
of work. it would be considered an in-home business.
Councilmember O'Neill pointed out an individual could work for another company and still carry
out the same work at their residence. He noted. this issue will need co be addressed.
Councilmember O'Neill stated qe is in agreement with the Planning Commission in that he does
not feel it is necessary for residenbi simply utilizing a computer in their home or those who work
one or wo days at home rather than in the office to obtain a home occupation permit.
.
Mayor Dahlberg noted bis agreement thar residents working at home on computers should not be
required to obtain a permit as long as it does noe involve customers coming to their residence.
It was felt a permit would be required in a situation where there is clientele coming to the residence.
the work is being performed from an accessory building or an employee is brought in to work.
Councilmember O'Neill noted noise and traffic are che major concerns of adjacent neighbors when
a request is brought forward for a home occupation permit.
A draft amendment will be. submitted to the Planning Commission for their review and
consideration at their next meeting.
..
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MJNUTES
AUGUST 3, 1998 . PAGE S
4. ADJOURNMENT
Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded adjourning the work session at 9:15 p.m.
Motion passed 3/0.
RESPE CTFULL Y SUBMITTED.
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Illc.
/j2/f~
roM DAHLBE7L<\ YOR
,/
,
,
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net
MEMO
TO:
May,or and Councilmembers
ae- J /7
Al Rolek and Jim Hurm ?t-
,IV
FROM:
Date:
November 12,1998
RE:
1999 Draft Utility Fund and Liquor Fund Budgets - Work Session Monday,
November 16 at 7:00 p.m.
Enclosed for your review please find drafts of the 1999 Utility Fund and Liquor Fund
Budgets. These documents will be discussed at the workshop on Monday night. The
documents consist of budgets for the Water Operations and Debt Service Funds, Sewer Fund,
Recycling Fund, Stormwater Management Fund and the Liquor Operations Fund.
The Water Operations Fund includes scheduled repairs to the well and pump at the Boulder
Bridge well location. The reconditioning of the pressure tank at the Woodhaven well
location and relining of the SE Area well are budgeted as capital outlays for next year. There
are no other major capital outlay projects planned for 1999. Other operating costs are
anticipated to be similar to this year in most respects. The Water Debt Service Budget
anticipates revenues from special assessments, the City of Victoria, and a transfer from the
Water Operations Fund. These revenues are expected to exceed the required debt service for
the year. The excess revenues will be held in reserve for future water debt service needs.
The Sewer Fund budget anticipates the continuation of inflow and infiltration (I & I) control
measures, including cleaning and televising sewer mains to find and repair 1&1 problems, and
the sealing of sewer manhole covers. The goal of the program is to ultimately reduce the
amount of flow being treated, thereby reducing our sewage treatment costs. MCES treatment
costs have remained stable to slightly lower than last year. Treatment costs are expected to
remain stable into the next year. The budget also includes the refurbishing of the Enchanted
Point Lift Station and the wiring of lift stations so that they may be powered by a generator in
emergency situations. This is part of an ongoing lift station rehabilitation program. The goal
of the program is to refurbish our aging lift stations at a rate of two stations per year over the
next several years. A transfer to the General Fund has been budgeted for overhead
administrative costs incurred by that fund on behalf of the Sewer operation. This was
discussed as a part of the General Fund budget.
,,,
" .. PRINiED ON RECYCLED P"PER
...
-t-!- ~:"
~:..-----,.
/. '-
The water and sewer funds also budget for depreciation of capital assets within the systems.
Although depreciation is a non-cash expense and does not affect cash flow, it is important to
recognize it as a real operating expense for these systems.
No increase in water or sewer rates has been included in the budget for the coming year.
Costs associated with capital improvements will be borne from the available fund balances of
these funds. There have been no increases in the water or sewer rates since 1993 and 1994,
respectively. Although no rate adjustment is anticipated at this time, we will continue to
monitor these funds for the need for possible future adjustments.
The Recycling Fund budget is substantially the same as this year. The contract cost of
recycling with E-Z will remain the same in 1999 as in 1998. Funding from Hennepin County
will continue for 1999, but is anticipated to decrease slightly. The annual spring cleanup and
fall leaf drop-off site continue to be budgeted from this fund along with corresponding
revenues. No adjustment is being proposed in the recycling fee at this time.
The Storm water Management Fund budget includes a continuing effort toward completing
small drainage projects and repairs. As in past years, about V2 of the stormwater fees are
directed toward this effort. The remainder of the fees and the General Fund transfer are set
aside for future storm drainage projects.
The Liquor Operation budget anticipates growth in sales of approximately 8% in 1999. It is
expected that most expense levels will remain stable. Areas expected to increase include
personnel costs and store rents for the Tonka Bay and Shorewood Plaza locations. We
continue to pursue a solution to the lease problem at the Old Market Road store. A reduction
in floor space would greatly enhance chances to realize a profit at this location. Considering
all of these factors, it is anticipated that the liquor operation will produce a modest net profit
in 1999.
We invite your feedback on these issues in addition to your comments on the budget items.
Please review the document and feel free to call us with any questions you may have. If you
have any other issues, we can research them and hopefully have some answers by meeting
time.
FUND:
Water
MISSION:
To provide a safe, clean, uninterrupted
supply of drinking water to all City
residents connected to the City water system.
SUBFUND:
Water Operations
FUND NO: 60
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Responsible for operation and maintenance of five (5) well systems, including all
pumps and well houses, maintenence of water tower and treatment plant, and
extension of new watermain and construction of new water facilities, as necessary.
OBJECTIVES:
- Supply a safe, clean uninterrupted source of water to all connections
- Explore possibility of interconnecting with other communities
- Perform pump repair and relining of Boulder Bridge Well
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
Estimated water sales based on quarterly billing at a rate of $1.45/1,000 gallons
Connection and permit revenues estimated based on 30 new homes
Interest income
Antenna Rental on Water Towers
Expenses:
Staffing:
.10 Senior Accounting Clerk
.30 Light Equipment Operator
.10 Receptionist/Secretary
Supplies/Materials:
Office Supplies, including billing forms and postage
Maintenance contracts for computer hardware and software
Maintenance of Boulder Bridge Well
Chemicals for water treatment
Support Services:
Engineering
Contract with Munitech for system maintenance
Insurance on water system
Water testing
Water system analysis
Charges & Fees:
Sales Tax on commercial water sales
State surcharge of $5.21/year on all connections
Capital Outlay:
Other:
Water Purchased from other communities
Meter purchases
Well utility charges
Transfers to Water Debt Service Fund and General Fund
Depreciation (Non-cash expense accounts for future system replacement)
108
FUND: #60 FUND: Water Operations DEPT # 80
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 Est-98 1999 1999
REVENUE
Charges for Service 283,829 236,806 236,250 122,965 268,000 252,750 0
Misc. Revenue 84,050 86,126 60,900 42,893 64,900 61,167 0
TOTAL REVENUE 367,879 322,932 297,150 165,858 332,900 313,917 0
EXPENSES
Staffing 5,679 13,749 19,637 7,487 12,264 20,440 0
Supplies/Materials 14,189 18,117 19,100 25,148 26,514 34,100 0
Support Services 62,703 75,900 63,550 58,178 67,153 67,050 0
Charges & Fees 6,944 6,631 6,900 3,523 6,900 7,000 0
Other 82,143 67,158 68,600 41 ,186 65,200 66,200 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 120,000 8,926 8,926 11 ,200 0
Transfers 10.726 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 42.400 0
Depreciation 80,649 91 ,470 130,000 0 125,000 125,000 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 263,033 313,025 467,787 184,448 351,957 373,390 0
SERVICE INDICATORS:
Miles of Water Line 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
No. of Connections 980 1,028 1,055 1,052 1,072 1,102
No. of Hydrants 220 220 222 222 222 222 222
Avg Daily Consump- gals 330,000 403,000 420,000
Water rate/1000 gals 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
BeQinninQ Cash Balance 1.692.611 729,554 615.007 615.007 615,007 682.950 682,950
Revenues 367,879 322,932 297,150 165,858 332,900 313,917 0
Expenditures (263,033) (313,025) (467,787) (184,448) (351,957) (373,390) 0
Depreciation 80,649 91,470 130,000 0 125,000 125,000 0
Construction of Infrastructure (2,173,439) (142,388)
Bond Proceeds. net 849.293
Other Cash Flow Imoacts 175.594 (73.536) (295) (38.000)
Ending Cash Balance 729,554 615,007 574,370 596,122 682,950 748,477 682,950
STAFFING:
Sr. Acctg. Clerk .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10
Lt. Equip. Oper./Foreman .25 .10 .10 .10 .10 .30 .30
Secretary/Recept .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10
109
FUND:
Water
MISSION:
To provide for the retirement of
debt incurred to construct water
system improvements.
SUBFUND: Water Debt Service
FUND NO: 60
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Responsible for the accumulation of resources for the retirement of Water Fund debt, and
for the periodic payment of principal and interest.
OBJECTIVES:
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
Property Tax Levy for Debt Service
Special Assessments on Water Improvements
City of Victoria Payments
Connection Charges
Interest Income
Transfers from Water Operating Fund
Expenses:
Staffing:
Supplies/Materials:
Support Services:
Charges & Fees:
Capital Outlay:
Other:
Debt service payments - Principal and interest 110
FUND: #60 FUND: Water - Debt Service DEPT # 80
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 EST -98 1999 1999
REVENUE
Property Tax 16,304 15 0 18 50 0 0
Sp Assess/Connect Chgs 301 ,483 240,902 265,000 270,524 328,500 215,000 0
Misc. Revenue 0 96,565 54,521 54,521 54,521 51,848 0
Transfers 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0
TOTAL REVENUE 317,787 377,482 359,521 365,063 423,071 306,848 0
EXPENSES
Staffing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Supplies/Materials 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Support Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other - Debt Service 88,300 244,334 308,382 308,682 308,682 296,235 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 88,300 244,334 308,382 308,682 308,682 296,235 0
SERVICE INDICA TORS:
Outstanding Debt, Year End 2,780,000 2,655,000 2,470,000 2,470,000 2,470,000 2,290,000 2,290,000
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
Beginning Cash Balance 97,000 326,487 459,635 459,635 459,635 574,024 574,024
Revenues 317,787 377,482 359,521 365,063 423,071 306,848 0
Expenditures (88,300) (244,334) (308,382) (308,682) (308,682) (296,235) 0
Ending Cash Balance 326,487 459,635 510,774 516,016 574,024 584,637 574,024
STAFFING:
111
SUBFUND:
Sanitary Sewer
MISSION:
To provide a safe, sanitary sewer
service to all City residents
FUND:
Sanitary Sewer
DEPT NO: 61
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Major activities include maintenance of sixteen (16) lift stations, and cleaning,
televising and repairing sewer mains to control inflow and infiltration. Sewage
treatment is performed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and is
provided for in this area.
OBJECTIVES:
_ Work with MCES to correct inflow and infiltration into the sanitary sewer system
_ Work with MCES to reduce sewage treatment costs to the City
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
Quarterly Sewer service charges at $65.00 per quarter
Interest revenue from investment of Sewer Fund cash balances
Other permit and connection fee revenues estimated based on 30 new homes
Expenses:
Staffing:
.10 Senior Accounting Clerk
.20 Light Equipment Operator
.1 0 Receptionist/Secretary
Supplies/Materials:
Office Supplies, including billing forms and postage
Maintenance contracts for computer hardware and software
Support Services:
Contract with Munitech for system maintenance
Sewer Main Cleaning
Inflow & Infiltration Control
Insurance on sewer system
Legal & engineering services
Utilities
Travel & seminars
Charges & Fees: .
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services service access charges ($1,050 per new connection)
Charges for sewage flow into City of Excelsior trunk mains
Metrooolitan Council Environmental Services sewaae treatment charaes
Caoital Outlav:
Refurbish Enchanted Point Lift Station
Emeraencv Power Wirina for Lift Stations
Transfers:
General Fund Overhead Costs
Depreciation (Non-Cash Expense accounts for future system replacement)
112
FUND: # 61 FUND: Sanitary Sewer DEPT # 82
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 EST-98 1999 1999
REVENUE
Charqes for Service 819.944 857816 780 500 432 967 813091 809 891 0
EXPENSES
Staffing 9,644 7,094 15,551 15,128 15,975 16,215 0
Supplies/Materials 8,135 6,084 11,700 1,134 2,200 12,000 0
Support Services 571,351 621,749 775,215 362,782 449,767 597,450 0
Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 60,000 0 0 67,000 0
Transfers 27,249 0 0 0 0 6,000 0
Depreciation 190,154 191 ,393 192,000 0 195,000 195,000 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 806,533 826.320 1,054,466 379,044 662,942 893,665 0
SERVICE INDICATORS:
Miles of Sewer Line 55 56 56 57 57 57
No. of Connections 2,586 2,623 2,650 2,647 2,662 2,692
No. of Lift Stations 16 16 16 16 16 16
Sewer Charge 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
Beginning Cash Balance 878,824 1,082,948 1,297,812 1,297,812 1,297,812 1,642,961 1,642,961
Revenues 819,944 857,816 780,500 432,967 813,091 809,891 0
Expenditures (806,533) (826,320) (1,054,466) (379,044) (662,942) (893,665) 0
Depreciation 190,154 191,393 192,000 0 195,000 195,000 192,000
Other Cash Flow Impacts 559 (8,025)
Ending Cash Balance 1,082,948 1,297,812 1,215,846 1,351,735 1,642,961 1,754,187 1,834,961
STAFFING:
Sr. Acctg. Clerk .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10
Lt. Equip. Oper./Foreman .40 .40 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20
Receptionist/Secretary .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10
113
FUND:
Recycling
MISSION:
To provide weekly pickup of recyclables
to all City residents; provide for the annual
pickup of household and yard wastes
SUBFUND:
Recycling
FUNDNO: 62
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY'
Weekly pick-up of newspaper, corrugated cardboard, recyclable plastics, glass and
metal, and other recyclable materials. Includes annual City curbside pickup of large household
items and brush, and operation of an annual brush/leaf composting drop-off site.
OBJECTIVES'
- Continue weekly pickup of recyclable materials
- Hold curbside pickup of household and yard wastes in the Spring of the year
- Provide a leaf and yard waste disposal site in Fall of the year
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
County Aid is a Hennepin County grant
Charges for Service includes City Clean-up fees and a
City Recycling Fee of $1.50 per month per household
Tranfers/other includes transfers, interest income and revenue shari!1g from the Recycling Contractor
Expenses:
Staffing:
Miscellaneous staffing for City Clean-up and Yardwaste Disposal
Supplies/Materials:
Office Supplies
Support Services:
Recycling contract with E-Z Recycling - $2.05/household/month for 2,400 households
City Clean-up costs
114
FUND: #62 FUND: Recycling DEPT # 84
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 EST-98 1999 1999
REVENUE
County Aid 21,590 21,501 20,400 21,332 21,332 20,265 0
Charges for Service 48,945 50,389 63,700 41,618 64,100 65,700 0
Transfers/other 550 858 800 727 900 900 0
TOTAL REVENUE & 71,085 72,748 84,900 63,6n 86,332 86,865 0
OTHER SOURCES
EXPENSES
Staffing 726 571 952 838 1 ,493 1,526 0
Supplies/Materials 0 2,080 0 232 232 150 0
Support Services 70,221 70,150 85,040 58,523 81,617 83,310 0
Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 70,947 72,801 85,992 59,593 83,342 84,986 0
SERVICE INDICATORS:
Avg. mo. Participant Hshlds. 1 ,484 1,256 1,300 1,257
Avg. mo. tonage 61 80 70 75
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
Beginning Cash Balance 19,383 12,385 14,258 14,258 14,258 17,248 17,248
Revenues 71,085 72,748 84,900 63,6n 86,332 86,865 0
Expenditures (70,947) (72,801 ) (85,992) (59,593) (83,342) (84,986) 0
Other Cash Flow Impacts (7,136) 1,926
Ending Cash Balance 12,385 14,258 13,166 18,342 17,248 19,127 17,248
STAFFING:
115
FUND:
Stormwater Management
MISSION:
To provide proper surface water and
ground water management throughout
the City.
SUBFUND:
Stormwater Management
FUND NO: 63
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Activities include maintenance of storm sewer system, including cleaning of catch basins,
dredging of drainage ditches and retention ponds, and minor repairs to system problem areas.
Provides partial funding for larger subwatershed drainage projects.
OBJECTIVES:
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
Stormwater Management Utility Charges
Misc. Revenue includes interest income and other misc. revenue
Transfers from the General Fund
Expenses:
Staffing:
.05 Senior Accounting Clerk
.10 Ught Equipment Operator/Foreman
Supplies/Materials:
Drainage Correction/Maintenance Mate'rials
Support Services:
Engineering
Contractual Services for drainage correction
Capital Outlay:
116
FUND: #63 FUND: Stormwater Management Utility DEPT # 85
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 EST-98 1999 1999
REVENUE
Charges for Service 44,491 44,911 44,300 21,878 44,500 44,500 0
Misc. Revenue 4,449 12,932 7,500 9,159 11,000 6,500 0
Transfers 110,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 10,000 0
TOTAL REVENUE & 158,940 67,843 61,800 41,037 65.500 61,000 0
OTHER SOURCES
EXPENSES
Staffing 1,360 3,251 8,273 1,528 2,457 8,531 0
Supplies/Materials 0 2,278 10,000 119 500 4,000 0
Support Services 13,674 16,263 16,250 4,391 5,700 13,150 0
Charges & Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 90,000 66,946 90,000 0 0
Transfers 39,808 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 54,842 21,792 124,523 72,984 98,657 25,681 0
SERVICE INDICATORS:
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
Beginning Cash Balance 98,249 189,385 233,903 233,903 233,903 200,746 200,746
Revenues 158,940 67,843 61,800 41,037 65,500 61,000 0
Expenditures (54,842) (21,792) (124,523) (72,984) (98,657) (25,681 ) 0
Other Cash Flow Impacts (12,962) (1 ,533) 0
Ending Cash Balance 189,385 233,903 171 ,180 201,956 200,746 236,065 200,746
STAFFING:
Sr. Acctg. Clerk .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05
Lt. Equip. Oper./Foreman .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10
117
FUND:
Liquor
MISSION:
To control the sale and distribution of
packaged alcholic beverages within the
City and to provide property tax relief
the use of operation profits.
SUBFUND:
FUND NO:
70
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY:
Provides for the sale of packaged alcoholic beverages to the general public.
OBJECTIVES:
- Effectively control the sale of packaged alcoholic beverages in the City
- Reduce rent in Old Market Road Store through reduction of floor space
- Produce a reasonable net profit
HIGHLIGHTS/COMMENTS:
Revenues:
Estimated liquor sales
Expenses:
Staffing:
1.00 Operations Manager
3.00 Assistant Managers
.15 Senior Accounting Clerk
14.00 Part time Sales Clerks
Supplies/Materials:
Office Supplies, Bags, Postage
Support Services:
Finance and Auditing Services
Contractual Rug Service
General and Liquor Liability Insurance
Electric & Gas Utilities, and Refuse Hauling
Charges & Fees:
Building Rental
Advertising
Credit Card Service Charges
Capital Outlay:
Misc. Revenue/Expenditures:
Interest Income & Service Charges
64
FUND: #70 SUBFUND: Liquor Operations DEPT #
BUDGET Actual Actual Budget YTD Sept Annual Proposed Adopted
ITEM 1996 1997 1998 1998 Est-98 1999 1999
REVENUE
Sales 1,705,040 1,876,660 2,025,000 1,533,015 2,050,000 2,211,000 0
Cost of Goods 1 ,362,986 1 ,492,786 1 ,589,625 1.202,988 1,609.000 1 ,735.365 0
GROSS PROFIT 342,054 383,874 435,375 330.027 441 ,000 475,635 0
EXPENSES
Staffing 179,397 181,364 192,375 144,805 193,625 215,450 0
Supplies/Materials 8,370 9,077 9,000 6,152 7,300 9,000 0
Support Services 42,235 41 ,764 45,000 31,730 44,500 47,500 0
Charges & Fees 134,498 161,418 140,000 122,537 168,500 175,500 0
Depreciation 10,376 10,551 12,000 0 10,n5 9,625 0
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 374,876 404,174 398,375 305,224 424,700 457,075 0
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (32.822) (20.300) 37.000 24,803 16,300 18.560 0
Transfers In/(Out) 0 (10,000)
Misc. Revenue/(Expense) 4,419 7.256 7,500 4.115 5.750 7.500 0
NET INCOME (LOSS) (28,403) . (13,044) 34.500 28,918 22.050 26.060 0
SERVICE INDICATORS:
None
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
Beainnina Cash Balance 95.150 52.376 55.487 55.487 55.487 82.562 82.562
Net Operating Income/Loss (32,822) (20,300) 37,000 24,803 16,300 18,560 0
Depreciation 10,376 10,551 12,000 0 10,n5 9,625 0
Other Cash Flow Impacts (20,328) 12,860 3,000 0 0 0 0
Ending Cash Balance 52,376 55,487 107,487 80,290 82,562 110,747 82,562
STAFFING:
Full time:
Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Manager 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Sr. Acctg. Clerk .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15
Part time:
Sales Clerks 16.00 15.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00
65
1tC,
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 904 .
PROHIBITED DISCHARGES INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA,
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 904.09 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as
follows:
904.09: PROHIBITED DISCHARGES INTO THE SANITARY SEWER
SYSTEM:
Subd. 1. Prohibited Connections: No person shall discharge or cause to be
discharged, directly or indirectly, any storm water, surface water, ground
water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, or cooling water to any sanitary
sewer. Any person having a roof drain, sump pump, unauthorized
swimming pool discharge, cistern overflow pipe or surface drain connected
and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer shall disconnect and remove any
piping or system conveying such water to the sanitary sewer systeII1-by-
March 1, 1994.
Subd. 2. Authority to Inspect: Every person owning improved real estate that
discharges into the City's sanitary sewer system shall allow inspection by
authorized City employees or its agents. as deemed appropriate and
authorized bv the City Council. of all properties or structures connected to
the sanitary sewer system to confIrm there is no sump pump or other
prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The authoritv to
conduct further inspections on a propertv under this section shall lapse upon
a detelmination that the propertv is in compliance with the requirements of
this section.
Subd. 3. Correction of VioJations: Any owner of any property found to be in
violation of this section shall make the necessary changes to comply... with
this ordinance by March 1, 1994 and such change shall be verifIed by
authorized City employees or its agents. Any property or structure not
inspected or not in compliance by March 1, 1994 shall, following
notifIcation from the City, comply within fourteen (14) calendar days or be
subject to the surcharge as provided in Subdivision 26 below.
Subd. 4. Discharge: Existing buildings with sump pumps and all newly constructed
buildings with sumps shall have a discharge pipe installed to the outside
wall of the building. The pipe attachment must be a rigid permanent-type
plumbing such as PVC, copper or galvanized pipe. The discharge shall
extend outside of the foundation and may not be pumped directly onto any
public right-of-way unless approved by the Public Works Director or their
designee. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer shall be closed
and repaired in compliance with applicable codes.
Subd. 5. Continued Compliance and Reinspection: Upon verified compliance with
this Chapter, the City reserves the right to reinspect such property or
structure at least annually to confIrm continued compliance. .".ny property
fOl.md not to be in compliance upon reinspection or any person refusing to
tF )-/
or a.
allow their property to be reinspected shall, f-ollowing notification from the
City, comply '.vithin f{)urteen (11) calendar days or be subject to the
surcharge hereinafter provided for.
Subd. 26. Surcharge: A surcharge set by an ordinance passed by the City Council is
hereby imposed and shall be added to every utility billing to properties not
in compliance with this Chapter. The surcharge shall be added to every
quarterly utility billing until the property is in compliance.
Subd. fiI-. Temporary Waiver: The City Council, upon recommendation of the City
Administrator and City Engineer, shall hear and decide requests for
temporary waivers from the provisions of this ordinance where strict
enforcement would cause a threat to public safety because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under consideration. Any request for a
temporary waiver shall be submitted to the City Administrator in writing.
Upon approval of a temporary waiver from the provisions of this ordinance,
the property owner shall agree to pay an additional fee for sanitary sewer
services based on the number of gallons discharged into the sanitary sewer
system as estimated by the City Engineer.
Subd. 1&.. Drainage: Storm water and all other unpolluted drainage shall be
discharged to such drainage facilities as are specifIcally designated by the
City Engineer.
Subd. .8.9. Remedies: The imposition of the surcharge shall not limit the right of the
City to seek an injunction in District Court ordering the person to disconnect
the non-conforming connection to the sanitary sewer or from pursuing any
other legal remedies available, or in the alternative, the City may correct the
violation and certify the costs of correction as an assessment against the
property on which the correction was made.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA this _day of
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.."
City Council Priorities
Quarter Re ort October, 1998
Status Code Key:
1 = Completed
2 = Work has begunllikely to be reached in 1998
3 = W qrk has begunllikely to be reached in 1999
4 = Work to begin laterllikely to be reached in 1998
5 = Priority should be reconsidered
6 = Not likel to be addressed in 1998
2
2
--*;::;-
""--