The URL can be used to link to this page

071398 CC Reg AgPCITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JULY 13, 1998 7:00 P.M. S CANNED AGENDA I. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg Stover O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda Champa 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 22, 1998 (Att. -#2A Minutes) B . City Council Work Session Minutes June 22, 1998 (Att.42B Minutes) C. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes June 29, 1998 (Att. -#2C Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE. Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked on an item when it is considered following its removal from the Consent Agenda. A. A Motion Approving a Sign Permit for Amoco (currently Fina) (Att.43A Planner's Memorandum) Applicant: Suburban Lighting Inc. on behalf of Oasis Market Location: 24365 Smithtown Road B . A Motion to Amend Resolution 98 -051 Establishing a Polling Place for Precinct III For All Future Elections C . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Extending the Moratorium on Telecommunications Facilities Applications (Att. -#3C Proposed Resolution) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Appointing a Vice Chair to the Planning Commission (Att. - #3D Proposed Resolution) 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING AN OUTLOT FOR WATERFORD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR AN ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN (Att. -#5 Planner's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution) r CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JULY 13, 1998 7:00 P.M. S CANNED AGENDA I. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg Stover O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda Champa 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 22, 1998 (Att. -#2A Minutes) B . City Council Work Session Minutes June 22, 1998 (Att.42B Minutes) C. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes June 29, 1998 (Att. -#2C Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE. Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked on an item when it is considered following its removal from the Consent Agenda. A. A Motion Approving a Sign Permit for Amoco (currently Fina) (Att.43A Planner's Memorandum) Applicant: Suburban Lighting Inc. on behalf of Oasis Market Location: 24365 Smithtown Road B . A Motion to Amend Resolution 98 -051 Establishing a Polling Place for Precinct III For All Future Elections C . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Extending the Moratorium on Telecommunications Facilities Applications (Att. -#3C Proposed Resolution) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Appointing a Vice Chair to the Planning Commission (Att. - #3D Proposed Resolution) 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING AN OUTLOT FOR WATERFORD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR AN ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN (Att. -#5 Planner's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 13, 1998 !' PAGE 2 OF 2 6. PARKS - Report by Representative Report on June 23, 1998 Park Commission Work Session (Att.46 Draft Minutes) 7. PLANNING - Report by Representative 8. CONSIDERATION OF PETITION BY ST. ALBANS BAY RESIDENTS (Att. - #8 Petition and Police Chief's Memorandum) 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR WILTSEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING (Att. -#9 Proposed Resolution and Feasibility Report) Engineer's Report on Informational Meeting with Wiltsey Lane Residents Held June 24, 1998 10. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS A. Staff Report on Development Monitoring B . Report on Shoreline Messages (Att.410B Messages Received on Shoreline) C. Report on Storm Clean-up D. Administrator's Report on Request For Stop Sign At Maple Leaf Circle (Att.4101) Letter's of Request and Background Information) E. Review Work Session Schedule and Council Priority Mid -year Report (Att.410E Schedule and Report) 11. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Report on June 29, 1998 Work Session ♦ Policy Survey ♦ Adult Use Regulations ♦ Telecommunications Consultant 12. ADJOURN SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att. - #12) U CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Meeting Monday, July 13,1998 Agenda Item #3A: The Fina gas station at 24365 Smithtown Road is converting to Amoco. As a result they have requested approval for changes to their current signage. The proposed sign plan is consistent with the Zoning Code and the conditional use permit which was issued several years ago. The Planning Director recommends approval of the permit per his staff report. Council approval requires a simple majority vote. Agenda Item #3B: The address which has been used by the Minnewashta Church has . been the wrong address, and in fact, would place them in Carver County. This was not :A caught until after the Council passed its resolution establishing it as a polling place. This motion would correct the address for the Minnewashta Church on the previously adopted resolution. Agenda Item #3C: At the Council's direction staff has prepared an ordinance r amendment extending the moratorium for telecommunications facilities to 31 October. It is expected that a consultant will be selected near the end of this month and that a public hearing on this matter will be scheduled for September. Adoption of the ordinance requires a simple majority vote by the Council. Agenda Item #313: The Planning Commission has recommended that Paula Callies be appointed Vice Chair of the Planning Commission. Approval of this resolution requires a simple majority vot e by the Council. Agenda Item #5: Staff recommends that the City lease a parcel of land located in the northwest quadrant of Covington Road and Old Market Road to the Waterford Homeowner's Association for purposes of erecting a subdivision monument sign. A hearing has been scheduled to consider the sale of the parcel, however, staff recommends leasing it rather than selling it. A representative for the HOA appears to agree with the $120 annual lease amount proposed by staff. If the Council agrees, it should direct staff to prepare a lease agreement. Approval of this item requires a simple majority vote. Agenda Item #8: This request is for greater traffic enforcement on St. Albans Bay Road. Please review the memorandum and material in the packet. After having done so, you may conclude that no Council action is necessary at this time. .. �-� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Executive Summary - July 13, 1998 Council Meeting Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item #9: Residents around the Wiltsey Lane improvement project area have been notified that the feasibility report is being considered by the Council Monday evening. Tom Plantichow, the resident who originally approached the City about the project, indicated that he felt he did not receive an early enough notice about the public information meeting. Although five residents attended, none of them live on Wiltsey Lane. Therefore, Monday's meeting could be treated as an information meeting, or we could again offer to establish another informational meeting for them if they desire. Direction to staff is desired. Agenda Item #lOD: Please review the material enclosed in the packet concerning the request for the stop sign at Maple Leaf Circle in the Shorewood Oaks subdivision. The main question at this meeting is the specific request on the petition that the neighborhood not be noticed or that there be a public meeting on the question. This of course is not consistent with current practice and we would recommend strongly that everyone in Shorewood Oaks be aware of the new request and that it be discussed at the next Council meeting. Council concurrence is requested. NOTE: Since the cover memo was printed, Mr. Swanson called back and asked that the item be placed on the July 27 agenda rather than August 10. He will notify petitioners that it will not be decided upon at the July 13 meeting. • CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 22,1998 MINUTES CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. He announced the Council will convene in Work Session immediately following the regular portion of the meeting. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa; Administrator Jim Hurm; City Attorney John Dean; Engineer Larry Brown; Finance Director Al Rolek B. Review Agenda Mayor Dahlberg read the Agenda for June 22, 1998. The agenda was approved as submitted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - May 26, 1998 O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for May 26, 1998, as amended on Page 3, Item D, Paragraph 3, change to read, "... the lot being designed to the house "; Page 7, Motion 2, change "4/2" to "3/2 ". Motion passed 510. B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - June 8, 1998 O'Neill moved, Garfunket seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for June 8, 1998, as amended on Page 3, Item 7A, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2, change "allegism to elitism "; Page 6, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3, change to read, "... these funds would probably be utilized for storm clean -up." Item No. 15, Sentence 1, change "appointments" to "change" and "main" to "biggest." Motion passed 510. C . City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes - June 8, 1998 Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded approving the City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes for June 8, 1998 as submitted. Motion passed 510. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Champa moved, Stover seconded approving the items on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions therein: A. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-067 "A Resolution Approving a 1998 Tree Trimmer's License" B. A Motion Approving a Block Party Request - July 18,1998 at 4:00 p.m. C. A Motion Approving the Permanent Appointment of Twila Grout as Parks/Public Works Secretary COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 2 Motion passed 510. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on June 9, 1998 Park Commission Meeting Chair Puzak reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the June 9, 1998 meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). B. Consideration of a Motion Accepting a Revised 1998 -2002 Park Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Mayor Dahlberg was in support of accepting the revised budget, noting it is a minimal amount given the types of expenditures which are needed to maintain the parks. Councilmember.O'Neill noted the CIP Budget will be discussed in the near future and while he is in support of accepting the revised budget, he felt this action should wait until the CIP Budget is reviewed and considered. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out the Park Commission will need a decision in order to plan for the future. Park Chair Puzak pointed out there are some projects which can be completed if it appears the long term budget will include funds to cover those projects. If those funds will not be available, several projects will be placed on hold and resources utilized for work which is mandatory to be completed. Councilmember Garfunkel asked what type of projects would be delayed. Chair Puzak explained playground equipment for the Minnewashta School, the Magic Square and the sewer lines to the concession stand are items which are currently being considered. Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded accepting a Revised 1998 -2002 Park Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Councilmember Champa pointed out Item C, the request for a contribution to the Minnewashta Elementary School for new playground equipment, must be considered at this time as well. Park Chair Puzak stated there is a request for the school, however, if that request is not granted, the funds will be allocated to another use. Councilmember O'Neill noted he will vote against this because he felt further consideration and discussion should be held relative to the Capital Improvement Program Budget prior to granting approval. Administrator Hurm pointed out the Capital Improvement Program is a five year plan and does not appropriate any funds. Mayor Dahlberg clarified approval of this request would simply indicate to the Park Commission they may plan for use of the funds. Vote on Motion: Motion passed 411. (Councilmember O'Neill was the dissenting vote.) C. Consideration of a Request to Contribute Funds to New Playground Equipment at Minnewashta School CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 3 Mayor Dahlberg questioned to what extent the playground equipment is utilized during the summertime and at times when school is not in session. Park Chair Puzak noted the equipment is frequently utilized given the close proximity of the ball fields. He pointed out frequently the school district and the community share resources and he felt it would be appropriate for the City to contribute funds which would allow the playground equipment to be upgraded. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out the school district has the ability to tax as a means of obtaining funds. Councilmember Champa remarked these are two separate bodies and the school has the ability to tax to cover these costs, therefore, he was not in support of contributing funds to the school. Councilmember Garfunkel commented this site is used similar to a neighborhood park. He was in support of the contribution in that this playground provides an area for neighborhood children to play. In addition, Councilmember Garfunkel noted that although the school district has the ability to tax, they probably would not. Councilmember Stover did not feel this to be an extremely expensive way to assure the children in the area have a playground to utilize. She pointed out this is being funded through the Park Commission and if this facility were not available as a park, those dollars would have to be provided somewhere else in order to provide a place for children to go in this area. Debbie DeLaVega, Ellen Jordano, Julie Moore, Sheila Johnston and Sara LaBelle, members of the PTO, were in attendance and reported the School Board has made it clear they do not provide funds for playgrounds. In the past, the PTOs have raised the funds for school playgrounds. Ms. DeLaVega explained other communities such as Tonka Bay, Wayzata and Chanhassen, have been approached and asked for contributions which they have made to their school playgrounds. Ms. LaBelle explained the School District will provide the entire base for the playground equipment if it needs to be upgraded or improved upon. Councilmember O'Neill was sympathetic to Councilmember Champa's argument. . Councilmember Champa inquired of the PTO members in attendance whether they have approached the School Board to request a change in this policy and request this become a part of the district's budget. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out by making this contribution rather than referring the matter back to the school district, the Council is exercising local control. Park Chair Puzak pointed out the plan presented by the PTO has been reviewed and approved by the Park Commission. He further explained the PTO is doing what the City would perhaps have to do in another location if the area children did not have access to this playground. Councilmember Champa expressed concern the School District is turning its back on the children by refusing to address this issue for the safety of the children. Councilmember Stover stated she would rather see the parents in charge of upgrading the playground for the children rather than the administration. Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded approving a contribution of funds for new playground equipment at Minnewashta School. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 4 Councilmember Champa expressed concern the PTO is unable to find support from the School Board relative to this issue. Councilmember O'Neill pointed out the responsibility of the School District is to educate the children rather than build playgrounds. Ms. DeLaVega pointed out the School Board must work many items into their budget and, therefore, playgrounds would not be a high priority. Sheila Johnston pointed out the School District is assisting in this project in that they are taking responsibility for dismantling the existing equipment and providing technical support which comes at a cost of approximately $20,000. Vote on Motion: Motion passed 510. Chair Puzak complimented the Council on their debate and resolution of this issue. 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative Councilmember O'Neill reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the June 16, 1998 meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRIBUTION TO EXCELSIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS CELEBRATION Councilmember Stover pointed out this is a contribution for the benefit of the downtown business people and the community. She felt it a worthwhile endeavor, however, she did not feel the Council should make the decision to utilize taxpayer dollars for this event. She felt anyone in support of the fireworks could make a personal contribution to the celebration. Mayor Dahlberg noted his agreement. Councilmember Champa also noted his agreement, however, he acknowledged time is running short and it is difficult to raise funds for this event. He felt given the fact the City has made contributions in the past and this item has been included in the budget, the contribution should be made this year. Councilmember Champa felt this issue should perhaps be discussed in the future. Councilmember Garfunkel commented this contribution has been traditionally made and felt it to be a nice gesture on the part of the City since a number of residents enjoy the fireworks display. O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded authorizing a contribution in the amount of $1,000 to the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce for Fourth of July Fireworks Celebration. Motion passed 3/2. (Mayor Dahlberg and Councilmember Stover were the dissenting votes.) Mayor Dahlberg stated he supports the fireworks, however, funds should be raised privately and somewhat more aggressively. 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE INFLOW AND INFILTRATION REPORT PREPARED BY WSB Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -068 "A Resolution Accepting the Inflow and Infiltration Report prepared by WSB." Councilmember O'Neill questioned whether this project will be completed on a piece by piece basis. Engineer Brown reported all of the manholes have been inspected and key areas to begin •• i CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 5 televising will be identified. Given the proximity of the pipe in the island area to Lake Minnetonka, this has been determined to be a high priority area. Brown felt it would be cost effective to work on a portion of the system each year. It will need to be taken into consideration when working through the budget each year. He pointed out that once a portion of the system has been televised, it will be necessary to make necessary corrections which will require budget expenditures. Councilmember Garfunkel noted there will need to be negotiations with Metropolitan Council to address a reduction in cost for unmetered areas in which inflow and infiltration are effectively reduced. Vote on Motion: Motion passed 510. 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1998 SEAL COATING PROJECT Stover moved, Champa seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -069 "A Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for 1998 Seal Coating Project." Motion passed 510. 10. CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 98 -03 - BITUMINOUS OVERLAY Stover moved, Champa seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -070 "A Resolution Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Project No. 98 -03 - Bituminous Overlay." Motion passed 510. 11. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS A. Staff Report on Development Monitoring Brown reported the City is attempting to finalize the Marsh Pointe, Watten Ponds and Smithtown Meadows developments. Mayor Dahlberg questioned whether the fencing issues have been resolved on the Watten Ponds site. Brown explained a notice was sent and the developer was responsive, however, since that time, fencing has been knocked down by deer and tree falls. A notice has been sent to the developer requesting this issue be resolved. B. Report on Shoreline Messages Received Hurm reviewed the messages which were received on the Shoreline (as detailed in the memorandum of Connie Bastyr, Communications Technician). C. Report on Storm Clean -Up Mayor Dahlberg reported he has viewed the Freeman Park drop site. Brown reported this site will remain open until the end of the month. The tub grinder will be returned to the site and wood chips will again be available to residents. Brown estimated total storm clean up costs to be approximately $45,000 to $50,000. He noted use of the Freeman Park site has been greater than originally anticipated. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 6 There will also be a fee payable to the City of Mound since the City of Shorewood was allowed to utilize their drop site for materials collected from Shady and Enchanted Islands. D. Establishment of July Work Session Dates The June 29, 1998 Work Session will include review and discussion of proposed adult use regulations, discussion on a telecommunications consultant as well as a discussion of the Policy Survey with Decision Resources. The July 20, 1998 Work Session will tentatively include discussion of home occupation permits as well as continued discussion of the Policy Survey with Decision Resources. 16. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Dahlberg reported he has received a telephone call from a resident in the Edgewood area indicating over the years there are regular power outages in this area. He requested staff investigate this matter and report back. Mayor Dahlberg also reported in meeting and speaking with residents relative to the recent storm damage, he believes there to be significant interest in burying NSP lines even though this would come at a cost. He felt there to be aesthetic and possibly technical advantages to burying the cables. 17. ADJOURNMENT Garfunkel moved, Champa seconded adjourning the regular meeting to Work Session at 8:45 p.m. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST • TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR I Am CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 22,1998 MINUTES CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 8:58 p.m. DRAFT A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa; Administrator Hurm; Finance Director Al Rolek; Engineer Larry Brown. B. Review Agenda Mayor Dahlberg reviewed the Agenda for June 22, 1998. Councilmember Champa suggested adding the issue of Wiltsey Lane to the agenda. The agenda was approved as amended. 2. DISCUSSION OF WILTSEY LANE PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING City Engineer Brown provided the Council with a Memorandum describing three scenarios addressing funding alternatives for improvements to Wiltsey Lane. Brown requested Council review the alternatives and provide direction to staff prior to the public information meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday, June 24, 1998 at 6:30 p.m. He suggested perhaps Scenario No. 3 would be appropriate. Councilmember Stover pointed out she is not comfortable with Scenario No. 2 in that it may set a precedent. She noted her belief property owners should contribute to these costs and commented it would be impossible for the City to reconstruct all of the roadways in the City. Mayor Dahlberg felt Scenario No. 2 to also be somewhat extreme. Councilmember Garfunkel noted he would not support this scenario either. Councilmember O'Neill stated he would not support either Scenario Nos. 2 or 3. Councilmember Champa noted property owners in a new development would be absorbing the entire cost of their roadway. He stated he would not support Scenario No. 2. Mayor Dahlberg commented he could support Scenario No. 3. It was the consensus of Council that Scenario No. 2 is not a consideration. Rolek noted when Church Road was reconstructed, this was at the expense of the property owners and there was no contribution by the City. Councilmember Champa felt the Council will need to address any precedent which has been set in this regard. Councilmembers O'Neill, Champa and Garfunkel stated they are in favor of Scenario No. 1, unless the residents are able to convince the Council there is a reason the City should contribute to this expense. Brown pointed out there are currently three other gravel roadways in existence in the City. f CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 2 Mayor Dahlberg requested staff set up a meeting with representatives of MNDOT relative to obtaining MSA funding which would take pressure off of the budget. DISCUSSION OF ASSESSOR POSITION Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, was in attendance. Mr. Erickson will be discontinuing his duties as assessor to the City of Shorewood. Mr. Erickson explained the City needs to have a certified specialist. This person could be employed by contract or as a City employee. Hurm suggested the City could participate in a cooperate agreement with another municipality in hiring an assessor. Mr. Erickson provided some background to the City. He pointed out the work is completely controlled by statute. He noted there is an extensive amount of auxiliary work which is required in addition to the valuation and classification of a property. In addition, there is a shortage of workers in this area. Mr. Erickson pointed out Hennepin County contracts with a number of the lakeshore communities. He felt it would be a favorable option to contract with the County. Mayor Dahlberg felt this would be the least desirable option. He would like the City to maintain as much local control as possible. Mayor Dahlberg felt the most favorable option would be to share services with another city. Mr. Erickson felt Shorewood to be of the size where an employee would be warranted. Councilmember Stover noted when the City utilized a County assessor in the past, there were a variety of assessors who would come out. Mr. Erickson felt it would be beneficial to hire one assessor. Hurm felt the position may be too much for one full time person noting there would be clerical and support work which would also have to be taken into consideration. Mr. Erickson noted this is specialized type work as well. Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether the Council should consider and review operational and administrative criteria by which an assessor would work. Mr. Erickson pointed out there are 700 parcels which need to be reviewed. He stated this work should be started in approximately September to allow sufficient time for the work to be completed. Mr. Erickson stated he has enjoyed his work with the City of Shorewood and noted he has appreciated all of the councils with whom he has worked in the City. He felt the Council to be very diligent in their work. Councilmember Garfunkel commented it may not be possible to meet the criteria the Council establishes since the market is so tight at this point. Mayor Dahlberg felt it to be important to hire an assessor who is able to work well with the public. Councilmember O'Neill suggested the Council seek applications for this position. Councilmember Champa pointed out the City of Orono will be looking for an assessor at this time as well and suggested the City consider a cooperative effort with them. Hurm will investigate this possibility. A CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22,1998 - PAGE 3 Mayor Dahlberg directed staff to review this matter and determine who would be available to fill this position. (Councilmember Stover Ieft the meeting at 10:00 p.m.) 4. REVIEW OF LIQUOR OPERATION STATUS Finance Director Rolek provided the Council with financial statements through the month of May. He commented he does not have faith in the perpetual inventory system. Rolek distributed the State Auditor's Report on Municipal Liquor Store Operations in 1996. This report describes the status of liquor stores around the state. Mayor Dahlberg questioned whether Rolek would anticipate the same position as the previous year in which there was a $60,000 loss at the Waterford location resulting in a net $10,000 loss against the profit of the other two stores. Rolek anticipates this year will produce very similar results. Rolek reported there has been an offer by a chiropractor wishing to lease 1,300 square feet of the Waterford space. There has been some preliminary interest shown in the remaining portion as well. Any potential lease would have to be approved by the Property Management Company. Rolek explained the Property Management Company at the Shorewood Shopping Center is requesting the City sign a lease rather than utilizing a month to month rental. The Company plans to renovate the Center and in order to accomplish this, the Center must be fully leased. There is a provision in the lease, however, if the store were to go out of business, there would be a six month notice required. Rolek pointed out, given the renovation, there will be an increase in the monthly lease obligation. Mayor Dahlberg requested Rolek make inquiry of the various stores and report back to the Council relative to any staffing concerns the stores may be experiencing. Councilmember Garfunkel felt there have always been staffing problems given the rapid turnovers which tend to occur. Mayor Dahlberg expressed concern and felt it should be a routine management function to ensure there is no drinking of alcohol on the premises of the stores. Rolek pointed out there is to be no drinking on the premises of any City property. Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concern relative to shortages and overages which are reflected in the financial statements. Rolek noted this would also be a function of management. Councilmember O'Neill suggested scheduling an Executive Session at the conclusion of the next regular Council Meeting to discuss personnel issues relative to the liquor stores. With respect to a potential lease at the Shorewood Shopping Center, Mayor Dahlberg stated he would like to delay taking action on this issue until pending legal issues as well as the lease situation with the Waterford store are more stable. Councilmember Champa suggested negotiating a lease with a 90 -day notice period as opposed to a six month provision. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22, 1998 - PAGE 4 Councilmember Garfunkel suggested scheduling a meeting of the Liquor Committee to address any issues there may be at the various stores. It was suggested this be scheduled prior to the Executive Session. 5. ADJOURNMENT Dahlberg moved, Champa seconded adjourning the work session at 10:36 p.m. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR • JAMEN U. HUKM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, JUNE 29, 1998 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION nRJ FT Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Garfunkel and Champa; Administrator Hurm; and City Planner Brad Nielsen. Absent: Councilmembers Stover and O'Neill B . Review Agenda 0 2. DISCUSSION REGARDING POLICY SURVEY Bill Morse from Decision Resources was unable to attend the meeting. Mayor Dahlberg stated that Decision Resources have done a lot of survey work for the City regarding parks and trails. Mayor Dahlberg stated that he will be handing out his survey results and they will also be publicly released and published. Mayor Dahlberg felt residents should be polled about keeping water connections voluntary. He felt housing density was another issue to question residents on. He wanted to know if residents are happy with the cable service they are receiving, and if the City should pursue burying utility lines. He questioned whether or not the Council is heading in the right direction with regard to land conservation given the fact that 60% of the residents have indicated a desire for more open space. Mayor Dahlberg directed Administrator Hurm to work with Decision Resources to develop possible survey questions. in Councilmember Garfunkel stated that the Council wanted to incorporate some historical questions as far as traditional City performance. Councilmember Champa questioned the animal control ordinances and whether residents felt they should be more restrictive, or if more enforcement was needed. Administrator Hurm reported he will be attending a meeting on Wednesday to find out the City's portion of funding from the Federal Government Storm Relief Fund. 3. REVIEW PROPOSED ADULT USE REGULATIONS City Planner Nielsen explained that they have extended the moratorium through the end of August which protects the City from having to consider new applications. This issue has surfaced because of past experience by surrounding cities. Nielsen explained that the City has very few commercial areas, based upon the restrictions incorporated within the ordinance, that an adult use establishment could be located. He explained they have approached this issue from two aspects: zoning and licensing. -tea c CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1998 - PAGE 2 Mayor Dahlberg asked that Nielsen summarize what it is that the City is going to be regulating. Nielsen stated that the only district that would allow an adult use establishment would be in the C -3 District (General Commercial District). This is the least restrictive district and it has the most opportunities from a commercial standpoint. There are three potential areas in the City: the Shorewood Shopping Center, the corner of Vine Hill and Highway 7, and County Road 19. Mayor Dahlberg asked the type of restrictions that could be placed on adult use establishments in these areas. Nielsen reported that the City has tight control over liquor operations, so more than likely the type of establishment we would consider would be a book or video store. Mayor Dahlberg questioned what the City's position would be on a shop that would provide access to any site on the Internet. Nielsen stated he was unsure how the ordinance would apply to such an establishment but would check with the City Attorney and report back. Mayor Dahlberg stated he was not talking about regulating the use of Shorewood residents' • computers in the privacy of their own homes, but rather commercial establishments. City Planner Nielsen stated a public hearing will be held to consider the licensing aspect of the ordinance. Attorney Greensweig will be at that meeting to answer questions from residents and be able to talk about the first amendment aspects of the ordinance. Nielsen reported the most restrictive element of the proposed ordinance was the limited hours of operation. Stores would be required to close by 10:00 p.m. and not open until 8:00 a.m. The current ordinance would allow a 24 hour operation. Nielsen stated a public hearing has been scheduled for August 4, and Council consideration no later than August 24. It will be publicized in the August Citizen Informer. 4. DISCUSSION ON A TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT The Council is looking for a consultant to guide the City through the process with regard to telecommunication facilities. Nielsen also felt that the consultant should help identify potential locations within the City for such facilities. Mayor Dahlberg questioned if a policy question on such facilities could be incorporated in the pending survey. Nielsen stated RFPs will be sent shortly to perspective consultants. Administrator Hurm asked Council to provide direction as to how they would like the interview and selection process to proceed. Mayor Dahlberg stated staff should conduct the interviews and prepare a recommendation. Council would then meet with the preferred candidate prior to authorization to hire. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES JUNE 29, 1998 -PAGE 3 Nielsen reminded the Council of the three active moratoriums: adult use, telecommunications and senior housing. Councilmember Garfunkel stated these three issues need to be considered relatively soon. Nielson reported the next work session will be on senior housing. He noted most moratoriums can be extended up to six months, however, with regard to telecommunications, the courts have upheld the limit on a six month moratorium. 5. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 p.m. Motion passed 310. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Twila Grout Secretary • Tom Dahlberg, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator • CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 July 1998 RE: Sign Permit - Oasis Market FILE NO. 405 (Sign Permits) Suburban Lighting has requested approval, on behalf of the Oasis Market, to install new signs at 24365 Smithtown Road (formerly Fina). They propose to replace the northerly half of the freestanding sign in front of their store with an Amoco sign and new price sign (see Exhibits A and B). They will also replace the Fina sign on the north side of the canopy with an Amoco sign (see Exhibits B and Q. The number of signs and the total area of signage will be virtually the same as what exists (slightly reduced by 1.5 square feet). The graphic on Exhibit C is somewhat confusing - only the north side of the canopy will have a sign on it, based upon the conditional use permit which was issued several years ago. It is recommended that the sign permit be approved for one canopy sign and the north half of the freestanding sign. cc: Jim Hurm John Dean Ray Roemmick 4 '3A is j . ` PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER. J JL . � R.9 tqunn¢�'� r\ AMOCO 110 Silvsr 1 1 8 9 . 125 9 Car Wash Free ---- 31 D 89.5 sq. ft. 1 13 , � , v� � � Gc S << -✓ Cv Cl /?-" « • E�ch;b:t A JL Nan Aw /- z z;ZA-c C-0 5z:� If'or- - - F �� 4C Q ��'�� ^ � ' da. sf �he� r FINA b-'It .; 4y� FRA an I7 vC� c min is CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE SITING OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section l: Section 5 of Shorewood Ordinance No. 331 is hereby amended to read: "DURATION: This Ordinance shall remain in effect through the 3 V day of October 1998, or until such earlier time as said ordinance shall be revoked or otherwise amended." Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this 27` day of July 1998. ATTEST TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR #113G CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98— A RESOLUTION MAKING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held January 12, 1998, Resolution 98 -002 was adopted appointing Roger Champa as Vice Chair to the Planning Commission for the year 1998; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held April 27, 1998, Resolution 98 -038 was adopted appointing Roger Champa to the City Council for the remainder of 1998; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 1998 the Planning Commission recommended Paula Callies be appointed Vice Chair. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council shall make the following Planning Commission position appointment for the year 1998: Planning Commission: Vice Chairperson Paula Callies ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of July, 1998. 0 ATTEST TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR �3� CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 July 1998 RE: Outlot E, Silver Ridge - Request for Purchase or Lease by Waterford HOA FILE NO. 405 (98.10) As explained in a staff report dated 6 June 1998 (see Attachment 1), the Waterford Homeowner's Association would like to erect a subdivision monument sign on the above - referenced property owned by the City of Shorewood. A public hearing has been scheduled for 13 July to consider the sale of the parcel. Although there are no current plans for the City's future use of the parcel in question, staff does not recommend selling the property. Rather, it is recommended that the property be leased to the Association at a rate of $120 per year. The City Attorney has indicated that a standard lease agreement could be prepared at very nominal expense. Among other terms • the lease should provide for insurance, maintenance of the sign and the site, and provisions for removing the sign in the future, at such time as the City determines a need for the property. Staff has spoken with Cheryl Samples, Chair of the Waterford Landscape Committee, and she feels that the recommended lease rate is reasonable. If the Council agrees, it should direct staff to prepare a lease agreement. The Homeowner's Association should then prepare a detailed sign and landscaping plan for approval by the City Council. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact me prior to the meeting on Monday night. cc: Jim Hurm Larry Brown John Dean Cheryl Samples // 5 is j - = PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: • RE: SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state. net Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen 6 June 1998 Waterford HOA - Request to Lease or Purchase Public Property for Entry Sign Monument FILE NO. 405(Misc.) Kevin G. Norby & Associates has requested, on behalf of tht aterford Homeowner's Association, that the Association be allowed to either lease o chase an outlot currently owned by the City. The subject property is Oudot E, , located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Covington Road and Old Market Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The Association would like to erect an entry monument sign as explained in a letter from Jeff Feece, dated 1 June 1998 (see Exhibit B). The property is a remnant from the City's purchase of the Silverwood Park property. It was severed from the park when Old Market Road was platted. Staff has done a - preliminary investigation on this request and suggests that there may be some merit in selling the outlot. Before spending more time on this issue, some direction from the Council as to its willingness to dispose of the property is needed. If the Council is willing to consider the sale of the property to the HOA, a public hearing can be scheduled for the first meeting in July. Another option would be to lease the site to the Association. If that is preferable to the Council, staff will obtain information as to a reasonable lease rate. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior to Monday night's meeting. cc: Jim Hurm Larry Brown John Dean Jeff Fleece PR ,:- �hftw �t _3 0ti .RED. '71 \43 (25) zo - 4 B. 54 ��y�R7 1 Q 123) \ ��2t � a5 r 7 >a9'.95 fiq t SL OF THE 3 5 6j 7A 60 4 44) (45) (43) 7 4 . - ^� 119. 56 5a. loa. 4 (42) 2 4T) I+ Iz "A 10 (4 1) 15 ,6 (32) 9 68) EAST 424. j6 go. 10 (49) (1) Aq (50) 33) 6 1 . 93 55. 1 (51) 12 (14 P 145 145 12 6 A 1 Z. CEMETERY 52) At !4 66 IX OF THE 1 (53) 14 .4 LOT A I .b t 15 A q 4 b#. lot. 101 , ADDR tl 38) 23a, 4. tf� 3 -45- Sfi i ' 51 6 � 10. 1 0 4 (1c) 3 14) (54) 0 W Z3 4 53 0 S. 22 93 % 4 12) a) ( \o \ I 3 7) (55) 95 I 13) 'n. 37. 105 0. �5 (6) 1 24 as tp 3 19 I I to IIITLIT 4 — too 4) 291. Nag Ica. 5 N69 17 25) -a 172.07 s9— . OL E 12 a 8 107,73 4W 10 (37) (24) .... ... 40 40 . 140 too 13 7 16 14 (27) (23) 160 30 44 265 12 A35. 5Z 96 (22) 135 94. e3 Isa. (3 4) ;1, 14 g 2 E 1. 65 I07.03 "'1111kt, zag'57*79•t: 5, mi. 33 OUTLOT 8 Z54 5• 1 to 7. 91 y.e 1 X . 3 18) 19) a 4i (17) (20) OUTL 7 A 12), (7) 128. 110 149. AT '45 321. 53 1 3.51 6r5 32 ca + n 55 31 4 T (7) + e, 163.93 I'M ]of %44 QUILOT 0 3 215.7 (35) 17 e 77 '36. 1 1 OL a 8 A A (8)4 41 13 P 162.� 4 g) 10) � L RI I OP 10) 1 64.4a (37) 13 (7) .55.s 1 4, 2 412 !9 n 57 1 9 5 (6) 147, 55 (8) wit 03 38) Tel OMOT c 35 4 . 43, . ' (40) jj 59 107. 50 14 Exhibit A 1 14) (2) SITE LOCATION Outlot E, Waterford T 4 GOVT LOT 4 JUN -a -9: MON 11:_ M.KAWELL & K.NORBY ol 933 033- P.9- Kevin G. Norby & Associates, Inc. Julie 1, 1998 Shorewood City Council, e% Brad Nielsen 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Council Members, The Waterford home owners association is currently in the process of planning beautification projects for the Waterford area. The purpose of such projects is to create a greater sense of neighborhood for those who live in and pass through Waterford. These projects will include landscaping and entry signage in various areas throughout the neighborhood. During the design process we have determined that the area located on the northwest corner of Old Market Road and Covington Road would be ideal for installation of an entry sign and landscape plantings. We believe that these improvements will enhance the neighborhood identity and provide continuity with other parts of the project. The property described above is currently owned by the City of Shorewood. We would like to propose a landscape easement created on this parcel that would be maintained by the home owners association. We have discussed the site location and more specifically what: might be proposed on it with the city engineering and planning staff. The staff has recommended to us that Nye write this letter to you requesting that you grant the Waterford home owners association the aptioa to either purchase or lease the piece of land. • Please review the above mentioned options. We appreciate your consideration of this matter and hope we can come to some agreement. J IV, ece Kevin G. Norby Associates Consultant for the Waterford homeowners association. 10901 Red Circle Drive / Suite 125 / . Ainnetonka, Minnesota 533131 {612' ) 9 Exhibit B REQUEST LETTER Dated 1 June 1998 MAY -26 -98 MON 14:13 M.KAWELL & K.NORBY 612 938 9337 P.01 Post - +t• Fax Note 7671 w To CoJDep f _ Fax 7 ar • • �-Z h G e i CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1998 7:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION RAFT Chair Puzak called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Ua ; A. Roll Call Present: Chair Puzak; Commissioners Dallman, Arnst, and Themig; Administrator Jim Hurm; Council Liaison Roger Champa Absent: Commissioners Colopoulos, Bensman and Cochran B . Review Agenda • 2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPING A POLICY ON THE USE AND IMPROVEMENT OF PARK LAND FOR ORGANIZED SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS Commissioner Arnst explained that the highlighted sections on the draft policy (attached) are the issues that the Park Commission would like to discuss. Areas being considered are: maintenance, long term expenditures and capital funding. Listed below are some comments that the Park Commission has made regarding what should be considered for developing a policy for sports organizations. It was determined to look at the word negotiate under Annual Contributions, and to look at item E "Determine Fee Schedule" at the next work session. A. Basic Facility (What the City will provide) w Safe activity space * Parking/Road/Toilets * Allocation of existing space Access B. Maintenance of Facility 1. Basic Maintenance • Safe • Mowing(Weed/Removal/Attractive grass areas • Removing trash and litter • Snow plowing 2. Enhanced Maintenance * Aeration, dragging, etc. PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES JUNE 23, 1998 -PAGE 2 * Requires additional support from the organization C. Improvements (Capital - user requested 1. Funding * Look at each request individually * Review and evaluate request based on: • Their needs • Our ability to accommodate • Needs of other users • Strive to overcome barriers • City approves plan and design • City assumes ownership 2. Maintenance * - City becomes responsible for maintenance 3. Ownership i * City becomes owner D. Annual contributions (Users fees) * Park Commission will negotiate annual fees to support enhanced services and dedicated use time with each organization * If sports organization declines, revert to basic level as described in item A- Basic Facility E. Determine fee schedule - To be discussed at another work session. There was a consensus that the Commission will continue to work on developing a coherent policy. 3. ADJOURNMENT • Arnst moved, Themig seconded to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 4/0. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Twila Grout Parks Secretary Draft 6/16/98 Shorewood Park Commission General Park Use Policies General History Park land has been purchased and developed for the use of the general public. Over the years sports organizations have developed facilities on park land on their own, or with the city, or have utilized facilities provided by the City. The sports organizations have also varied in their financial support of the parks in general. Trends Several trends are clear. Less revenue is expected for capital improvements because fewer new lots are left to be developed which results in a reduction in park dedication fees. Also, less new development and concern for high property taxes will make it more and more difficult to support on -going maintenance of fully developed parks. No Non - resident Lake area cities provide recreational amenities to varying degrees. A Fees vast majority of those playing organized sports in Shorewood parks do not live in Shorewood. But each city can make that statement regarding their parks. It is important that cities do not expect higher fees be paid by "non- residents ". This would be a paperwork nightmare for the organizations and cities alike. It would be parochial and harmful to the long- standing tradition of cooperation among Lake Minnetonka area cities. fees? .. - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- Draft 6/16/98 A Policy Framework For Decisions Regarding "Improvements" To Park Land Set Aside For Sports Organizations Field Athletic fields need to be useable by the general public except for Availability times specifically reserved by the sports organizations for games and reasonable practice. Requests When a sports organizations requests improvements beyond the From Sports basics, the chance of approval and implementation is greatly Organizations enhanced as the proportion of funds (resources) provided by non- For Improve- City sources increases. A meritorious proposal with full outside ments funding is likely to be implemented quickly while the same project requesting full or partial City funding must be "fit into" the 5 year Capital Improvement Program if the City feels funding may become available during that time period. Requests for improvements should be made during the summer for consideration for the next year's City budget. • City Becomes Once an improvement for a sports organization is completed it Owner becomes the property of the City of Shorewood. When it is time for major repair or replacement, the organization may provide funds or wait for the City to identify the need and schedule partial or full funding in the 5 year park Capital Improvement Program. is Types of Expenditures: • New projects or facilities (i.e. magic square) •Improvements to current facilities (i.e. bleachers, scoreboards) •Major repairs (i.e. new roof) •Ongoing maintenance (i.e. mowing) 2 Basics The City provides land, a base facility, basic park amenities and Provided maintenance. Anything beyond basic annual maintenance, or any improvements to the reserved areas is the responsibility of the sports organization. If the improvement promotes safety, the City may consider participating in the cost of the improvement in a partnership with others. I To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: July 8, 1998 Re: Agenda Item #8 - Petition by St. Albans Bay Residents • I have met with Chief Rick Young on this issue. Following the item being discussed at a Greenwood City Council meeting, the following will happen: Our radar unit will be placed on St. Albans Bay Road the week of July 12. Over the following four to six weeks officers will be placed along St. Albans Bay Road on an intermittent basis for several hours at a time. They will emphasize the morning and evening rush hours. Following these actions a report will be done and presented to the City Councils of Greenwood and Shorewood. cc: Chief Rick Young • tt8 I u By 15 June, 1998 To: The Council Members of the Cities of Shorewood and Greenwood From: The Residents of St. Albans Bay Road During the summer of 1997, a request was made of the Greenwood City Council by a Greenwood and St. Albans Bay Road resident, to address the speed levels of traffic and the lack of enforcement of the posted 25 mph speed limit on St. Albans Bay Road. 0 The issue was brought to the South Lake Public Safety Department which initiated one week of monitoring. Officers did monitor traffic and speed daily for about one hour or less during peak driving periods . During this time frame, officers reported • that the average speed of traffic was between 32 and 34 miles per hour. The officers did cite two individuals traveling in excess of 38 and 40 miles per hour respectively. Following this monitoring period, it was deemed by the South Lake Public Safety Officials, that the excessive variation from the posted speed limit appeared to be isolated and that infractions over thirty miles per hour apparently did not warrant citations. Further, the South Lake Public Safety Officials indicated that continued monitoring and enforcement in the future would be on an intermittent and time - allowing basis. I Given this, the residents of St. Albans Bay Road in the cities of Greenwood and Shorewood believe the following to be true: 1. St. Albans Bay Road is a residential street with increased use by motorists, including but not limited to the residents of Greenwood and Shorewood. 2. St. Albans Bay Road appears to have become a thoroughfare to downtown Excelsior and its business district; primarily and especially during the non - winter months of the year. • 3. The 'speed limit is currently posted at 25 miles per hour. 4. St.Albans Bay Road is also frequently utilized for pedestrian travel including bicyclists, families with young children and pets, and aging citizens of the Greenwood and Shorewood area. The residents of St. Albans Bay Road appreciate pedestrian travel and would like to be able to encourage continued or increased pedestrian travel if the current speed patterns were-at safer levels. We also feel that the current 25 mile per hour speed limit should remain, as it is conducive to safe levels of traffic, supports the • safety of pedestrian traffic and promotes the safety of its residents. 5. The Residents of St. Albans Bay Road have personally witnessed multiple instances of speeds in excess of the posted 25 mile per hour speed limit. The following residents of St. Albans Bay Road believe that an increase in monitoring and enforcement by the South Lake Public Safety Officials is warranted, requested and expected. Furthermore, we believe that the speeding problem on St. Albans Bay Road is the responsibility of the South Lake Public Safety Department and the city councils of Shorewood and Greenwood respectively and collectively. We believe that this matter is a Public Safety issue and expect the councils to address this in the next available council meeting. The citizens of this community wish to witness the response of the elected officials taking this issue forward and for the record. NAME ADDRESS &j �� !fir 6�� ►�� ,, L) m j ey Age • J�•1�r" T 4G S+ ( �C I CC l / Y4 - 1 , 16 G 5- k 1S0 0 5/ (0 ST ti >!� - W 7 L8 -PiENEs774 A-A cc P;reenwood City Shorewood City r • 0 Albans Bay Road is the responsibility of the South Lake Public Safety Department and the city councils of Shorewood and Greenwood respectively and collectively. We believe that this matter is a Public Safety issue and expect the councils to address this in the next available council meeting. The citizens of this community wish to witness the response of the elected officials taking this issue forward and for the record. 5110 tjlm<!S RO arzNae TC �s n� j k/7Y & (/C_ 7n M ,J rt` SC 35 4. A I b(c n '?, , 11 C 6 c RT tVA 4 Z NL4, 5 5 0 �� l�j � �.✓ * ''�- �'„ cc Greenwood City Council Shorewood City Council SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG Chief of Police MEMORANDUM To: Sandy Langley, City Clerk, City of Greenwood James C. Hurm, City Administrator, City of Shorewood From: Chief Rick Young 7 Date: July 6, 1998 Subject: St. Albans Bay Road (612) 474 -3261 I recently received, by certified mail, a letter concerning perceived speed problems on St. Albans Bay Road. The letter was accompanied by a petition signed by residents of 16 homes out of approximately 48 homes on St. Albans Bay Road and residents of 5 other homes in the area. This is not a new request. In August of 1997, at the request of the City of Greenwood, the police department did expend extra effort to address the concerns expressed by the residents. A copy of the request letter and a copy of the results are attached. My opinion, as expressed at that time, has not changed. I would never deny that there are not some speeding vehicles on St. Albans Bay Road. This is obvious because we have issued citations for such violations. I would also have to say that there are speeders on all other roads in the city for that matter. However, I still maintain that the numbers of speeding vehicles in this location does not warrant an increased enforcement effort above and beyond normal patrols. There are many, many other roads in the two cities which have a demonstrated speeding problem far in excess of what we have found on St. Albans Bay Road. I would first like to point out that St. Albans Bay Road in the City of Greenwood appears to be posted illegally. Neither this department nor the City of Greenwood offices can find any evidence that the road has ever been approved by the State of Minnesota for the reduced speed limit of 25 MPH. Absent such approval, the statutory speed limit of 30 MPH applies. I am not aware of any officers report which states the average speed of traffic was between 32 and 34 miles per hour. Obviously, to maintain such a high average, many, many more vehicles would have to have been exceeding the speed limit to the point of receiving a citation than we have found to be the case. In fact, the only reports I have seen would be completely opposite to that statement. The only speed study I am familiar with occurred continuously over a twenty -four hour period. That study showed 738 total vehicles (going both directions 0 • Serving South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay and traveling over 6 MPH) used the street during that time period. A full 77.6% were traveling 25 MPH or less. Only 511 Oths of 1 % of the vehicles were traveling in excess of 35 MPH, the point at which they would receive a citation. If these vehicles were actually traveling in Greenwood, none of them would have been exceeding the speed limit enough to receive a citation. In checking my records, I do not find where officers cited two individuals for 38 and 40 MPH. We did issue citations for 38 and 39 MPH. These were to local area residents (one Greenwood and one Shorewood). The letter states that South Lake Public Safety officials deemed "that the excessive variation from the posted speed limit appeared to be isolated and that infractions over thirty miles per hour apparently did not warrant citations ". This statement is basically correct but needs • further explanation. I have already mentioned in this letter my feelings on the numbers of violations. The reference to not citing persons over thirty miles per hour is based upon a department policy to not cite violators until 10 MPH over the limit. However, this is not just our department policy. It is the minimum policy of every police department I know. It is really set by the Judges because absent extremely unusual circumstances, they will not convict for anything less. Not only that, they will "hold it against" departments who clutter up their courts with such minor violations. I know this is hard for some people to accept, but it is not the police department who really sets such guidelines, it is the court (even though they would not publicly admit it). I would also urge the city not to publicize this fact. All it could do would be to increase the speeds of those persons who thought the tolerance was only 5 MPH. I believe the inclusion of false or misleading information in the petition cover letter taints the petition. I do not know if the petition would have received the same numbers of signatures • had the persons been given the correct facts. However, to respond to the numbered items, I would agree with number one. However, I do not know if we have verification of increased traffic and would question what time period is being referenced. Certainly the street is not limited to residents of Greenwood and Shorewood. It is a public street open to all who want to use it, just as their residents use other streets. I can not understand the rationale for number two. It makes no sense to me that someone en route to Excelsior on Minnetonka Boulevard would go out of their way to go south on St. Albans Bay Road instead of continuing west toward Excelsior on Minnetonka Boulevard. Likewise, I can not conceive of someone traveling west on Excelsior Boulevard turning north onto St. Albans Bay Road instead of continuing west toward Excelsior on Excelsior Boulevard. I would agree with number three. However, I have already mentioned my concerns of the legality of such signs in Greenwood. I would agree completely with number four. In number five, beyond guesses at speeds, I do not know what form of speed measurement the residents used, but I certainly agree that there are multiple instances of vehicles traveling in excess of the posted 25 MPH speed limit. I have already addressed this issue previously in this letter. It would be my position that the volume of traffic on this street is not that high for such a street. Further, that the speeds on this street do not merit the same "extra" enforcement that other streets with a demonstrated speeding problem merit. To have an officer sit for two and one half hours on this street before they find a vehicle exceeding the speed limit, sufficient to issue a citation, would not be an appropriate use of their time on a consistent basis. This is particularly true when there are many, many other city streets which generate complaints and the officers do find citationable violations occurring at a much, much greater frequency. • I would again repeat my recommendation that this street receive normal patrol. I will, however, inform the officers of this complaint and ask them to try and spend some more time in the area as their call load allows. • nc UE1'YtD AUq - 8 1q,97 On Lake Minnetonka August 7, 1997 South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Attn: Chief Rick Young 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, MN 55331 • Dear Rick, This is just a follow -up to our conversation on August 6, 1997 regarding the enforcement of the 25 mph speed limit on St. Albans Bay Road. It is important to have consistent visibility especially between the hours of 6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM. This complaint has been telephoned in by Bob Gould and he has talked to Shorewood as well as Deephaven Administrators. He has also contacted each of the Council members in Greenwood. I also understand you have placed the speed sign for one day along this stretch of road. I hope that we can see some consistent visibility to help solve the speed problem. Thank you for looking into this problem. If you have any further questions please give me a call at 474 -6633. • Sincerely, �, Sandra R. Langley City Clerk/Administrator cc: Bob Gould Jeannie Bowers -Stead CITY OF GREENWOOD • 20225 Cottagewood Road • Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 • (612) 474 -4755 Public Works / Building Inspections (612) 474 -4759 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Alan Albrecht Greenwood City Council From: Chief Rick Young Date: July 1, 1998 Subject: Request for Speed Enforcement (612) 474 - 3261 Chief of Police I was requested to have officers concentrate some speed enforcement on St. Albans Bay Road (in the area of 4960) between the hours of 6:00 a.m, and 9:00 a.m. and also 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. I advised the officers by memorandum (see attached) of specific times I wanted the area worked, if they were free from other calls. Below are listed the results. - Three times they were called away before being able to complete the hour I had requested them to work and one day they were unable to get there at all. In total, they worked five hours and eight minutes in this location. They wrote two speeding tickets in that time. 08/07 1 Hour 22 min. 1 citation 39 MPH resident of Regents Walk 08/08 30 min. Fastest was 32 MPH 08/11 1 Hour 2 min. 1 citation 38 MPH resident of Minnetonka Blvd. 08/12 0 - Tied up on other calls 08/13 34 minutes Fastest was 31 MPH 08/14 40 minutes no contacts 08/15 1 Hour no contacts The activity suggests that while there are some violations, it is not an area with outrageous and continuously flagrant disregard for the speed limit. We will continue to monitor this area as time allows. 1 �J 0 Serving South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior. Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay 4 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator n FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: July 9, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Feasibility Report and Setting a Date for the Public Improvement Hearing Attached is the feasibility report for the Wiltsey Lane Improvement Project. Total project costs amount to $44,344. The recommended alternative calls for 100 percent assessment to the 5 benefiting property owners. This amounts to an assessment of $8,419 per lot. The City Council can choose what period this is to be assessed, if appropriate. A 10 to 15 year period is typical. The second portion of this item sets a date for the public improvement hearing. It is suggested that August 10"' be established as the Improvement Hearing date at 7:15 during the normal City Council meeting. A separate resolution will be provided at Monday night's City Council meeting. is -= PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER r J a -M x514 de+ a W1 LTSEY LANE VEMENTS ;a -- Shorewood, Minnesota 0 • as for the City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 June 3, 1998 FEASIBILITY REPORT WIL TSEY LANE IMPO VEMENT PR OJECT SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 June'), 1998 Revised June 29, 1998 0 Prepared By City of Shorewood Engineering Department 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Data Provided By WSB and Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood lake Office Park 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct utpervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the tate of Minnesota ate: June S, 1998 Reg. No.: 23390 0 Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLESHEET ...................................................................................................... 1 CERTIFICAITONSHEET ....................................................................................... 2 TABLEOF CONTENTS .......................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 4 2. AUTHORIZATION .......................................................................................... 4 3. PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................... 4 4. DATA UTILIZED ............................................................................................. 4 5. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 5 6. PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS 6.1 Street Section ............................................................................................. 5 6.2 Sanitary Sewer ............................................................................................. 5 6.3 Watermain ................................................................................................ 6 6.4 Permits / Approvals .................................................................................... 6 6.5 Right of Way / Easements .............................................................................. 6 7 FINANCING 7.1 Opinion of Probable Cost .............................................................................. 7 7.2 Funding ...................................................................................................... 7 8 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMENDATIONS .............................. .............................. APPENDIX OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Council of Shorewood authorized the preparation of a Feasibility Report for the improvement of Wiltsey Lane. The Feasibility Report outlines the proposed improvement project which consists of approximately 520 linear feet (l.f.) of city street. Improvements include subgrade correction as necessary, regrading, and the placement of bituminous pavement. The surface water drainage will also be reviewed to ensure that no drainage problems will exist once the project is completed. The estimated project cost is $44,344, which includes 20% indirect costs for this project. Funding for the project could be provided by one of two options. Option 1 involves assessing 100 % of the roadway costs to the benefiting properties. Option 2 involves assessing 50% of the roadway costs to the benefiting properties, with the remaining portion of the project costs funded from the Local Roadway Funds. Under current practice, Option 1 has been the current practice by the City Council. The most recent of this type of project was the Church Road reconstruction project. The proposed improvements can be completed, including the final lift of bituminous, and all of the restoration items in the 1998 construction season. The assessment hearing, if necessary, is proposed to be held in 1998 following the completion of the construction. This project is feasible and cost - effective from an engineering standpoint and, if so ordered by the City Council, should be constructed as proposed herein. 2. AUTHORIZATION In May, 1998 WSB and Associates, Inc. was commissioned to obtain survey data and to prepare is an opinion of probable costs for the bituminous paving of Wiltsey Lane. This report is in response a petition received from adjacent homeowners to improve the existing gravel roadway. 3. PROJECT LOCATION Wiltsey Lane is an existing cul -de -sac approximately 520 lineal feet in length and is located immediately north of State Trunk Highway 7 and east of Pleasant Avenue. (refer to Figure 1). 4. DATA UTILIZED In preparation of this report, survey data was collected in the field by WSB and Associates, Inc. for the basis of preliminary design, and estimation of probable costs. Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 4 Spray — Island Lake Minnetonka Upper Lake Howard Point II E ,pGE CIR. P • ° 9 ! 0 19 fBRENTWOOD avE, m Q•' r ° AMLEE RD. > VALLEY WOOD R0. NELSINE ? a 4 d SUNNY w VALE R0. `'> 1 OR. 3 GLEN R0. z O d. ° o � a wlLO ROSE ; La. LA. °¢� L4 C4 o 0 T w ° ? Q HARIDING J I STAR CIR. o a I9 Rw NKq U � 5 w AV rO o r a � GILLE o a a N SMITNTOWN RD. City CLOVER W ; _ o HCII °m LA. M CLAIN i a a v SMITHTOWN ECHO ELDE R0. u a y W00 OLAWN AVE. e�RCH BLUff W PLEASANT PL. y v G N Duck Froc _z Island Islan ELM G J f 0- // EDGEWOOD CIR.1� RD, o ORCHARD CIR. � ? P °o � , I \ I \ � wEDGEwOa oR. TI t7N R23w 30129 NOBLE 31132 SHOREWOOD 1990 POP. 5.913 ^ � e TR• i " TSB u RIDGE POINT O MANN LA. CIR. Mary j SLU E E O O <� Lane �F. P \ BEVERLY 9 OR, � 0 9 u M l nnewask E ai ;E LA I W. J u w G m O \ 7 A > J T11 / CART) Ps�E tee•• .�� RD. ` / ADO K �{ C?ESTVIEw CKI %il'' DR , MAPL V -5 CLEN DALE CIR. VVV a < c 95. °; DR. TIt6N ¢ STRATFORDO R R23W O s � 5 RIDG 7 8 STRATFORD LA KINGS 'AI RD. C L `__ a LA. I B ERRY w R�PL� a m j W �H000 C _ MAPLE 2 m r AVE. HOOD OAK DR. ' .All LEAF TR, I� CLIFF' O �APN0p0 OU G�Pto s7h0^, ob LAKFI I � OM t 1 PVf • 1 y a 40, 9 9P ��• Crescent C ; City � ° s 2 �� soF Beach / WIL DHURST Hall °� Q v J RD. r 1 = c _AVE /OLD BLUff s mom? i CRABAPPLE LA. Gideon 6a te l 7 A ' TH OR, o 13 �' f ORCNARO > 64TH 41 C3r S FOREST W ST. ' Z N N AVE. o u G 0 W C P R aiOG6 ` �• E P L Project w Location X - m TR• i " TSB u RIDGE POINT �•p MANN LA. CIR. Mary y / F Y ¢ z o Lane �F. o �F z O ,n w �.� V ELLOWSt ° ° TI 2 Lake J 12 Z a > c` o Linden ? J u w G m O z 7 A > J T11 �Z 7 A ' TH OR, o 13 �' f ORCNARO > 64TH 41 C3r S FOREST W ST. ' Z N N AVE. o u G 0 W C P R aiOG6 ` �• E P L Project w Location X - 350 Westwood Lake office "All Wayzata Iloulevard Whiltsey Lane TSB Minneapolis, MN 55428 812 -ul - 4800 '`� I FAX S41-1 City of Shorewood Minnesota INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS WSB Pra ed No. 2017.00 Figure 1 Date. June 3,1998 t % \2017.00 Ol.dgn Wiltsey Lane Improvements x ` a ' < � sa l MEN C�OF�CREft_µllVEFT ' -"�\ ` _ – ❑ 1O•F – �. •� NEW EA ITARY - SEWER ERVICE 40•R i [x ISTINO ►!.YETENi WILf SE• LAVE 0.02'/' "A lit tl� iYv I''{ 'WEARING COURSE PAVEIEN! 2'•, BASE COURSE PAVEIENT o n so 9' AGGREGATE BASE W CONPACTEO SUBCUT - 9441 VArya,. B.A—d V/SB IigeA Na I0I7.00 Date: Asst31S9S WSB V kI ' SUM Wiltsey Lane 110- . IAx9a,-Rm Figure 2 WFRASTFI "F. - fMFNEERS - PLANN(R9 City of Shorewood, Minnesota eva,.00.c,e. Ne.aa.ev, 0 6 0 5. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5.1 Existing Conditions The existing roadway varies in width from 18' to 20' wide, with a cul -de -sac radius of approximately 30'. Several mature trees existing on the north side of the roadway. The south side of the right of way is contiguous with the Minnesota Department of Transportation right of way for Trunk Highway 7. Six parcels of land are adjacent the north right of way line of Wiltsey Lane. The property located in the northeast quadrant of Pleasant Avenue and Wiltsey Lane intersection fronts off Pleasant Avenue. Since the residence fronts off Pleasant Avenue, and does not appear to receive much benefit from this project, this parcel has not been included in the calculations for assessment. 0 6. PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS The proposal prepared for this report includes reconstruction of Wiltsey Lane and are considered preliminary in nature. This design may be modified during final design to address any issues discovered during the design process. 6.1 Street The proposed street improvement includes the construction of approximately 520 linear feet of 22' wide edge to edge rural street section with a cul -de -sac on the east end of the project (refer to figure 2). The proposed street section will be constructed to a pavement section of four inches (4 ") of bituminous pavements and nine inches (9 ") of Class 5 aggregate. It is anticipated that most of the existing aggregate base will be excavated, regraded, and recompacted. Areas deficient of a full section or sufficient subgrade strength will have Class 5 base added. In addition, a subgrade tile line will be installed to promote subgrade drainage, thus minimizing damage due to frost heaves. The current street alignment will be maintained. The roadway will be widened slightly to accommodate a minimum street width of 22 feet. No additional right of way or easements are anticipated to construct the improvements to Wiltsey Lane. 6.2 Sanitary Sewer The original installation of sanitary sewer had included services for 2 lots within the Cul -de -sac area. Since that time a lot split was approved known as the GWK 2 "d Addition. (refer to Figure 3). At the time of the lot split, the additional sanitary sewer service was not installed, as the parcels had not been built upon. It is recommended that this additional service be installed Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 5 _ RA' 00 Y Y W 110 tYi' YU I -- _� t 5, 62 W 30.5 270• rn "A ))- ; N Boundary of W . a9' I. °7 OF I LaT c 9 °� Benefiting Properties 37 �, =1 �x � 17 t. 32 nd ddi GW 2 I A i ton � N o (BE�a:�c5 3 ?u N5p ( 26) 1 ,7 55 8 °C ON Sr _ .151 r. :}1:: NO '6 .. , t c 24 \ n y �- I ,SS7 T e5S• `� 1 �� 93.88 4 R• 1255.35 ` y i •.... .....- _ � 158.: I 332.98......... 7 -+ 154.46 88.38: 0 2tt 8 , 50 5 M ,6� 587'41'30'w 1 42. w a�. o t ° (9 ) "•• 24. 73 16.21 74 IZ 3 V3 7 05 N81'25'E N a�' = ( 10) C t� 5 J ' I io 1 '03.4 2 ^ c e 1 ti °' O ^ ,6 i 6 ¢ a ( 4 8 ` 3 < < i ° v (24) 4 N �i (25) 111. s1 o `\S�o3 /� Q,la" Z Z0 (6) 06 17 (6) N ( 6) ADDV 2 8 O r o �$'�f u' 204.72 r o n cap ® N r o 4 S ` V 1 6 r 6 rn a •........ tee' • ... �� ., e A � r 240.8 � o3 d O 9 , 21 � 19 o� . �3► G ) \a� 1 N r r 5 N RD I � ✓' N ` 4 A (s) 2$ y;::`:``>5i ` ?'t�: 43.41 111 1 , �0• N : j�' ��. Lasi `;2isi' ?�i <`;:k?�::;:;:::ii:;; 5 - 4. e WIL TSEY , 5 ��77� tit l A — �d; 6 �i tw9s ►at5r*>K' ► ,s ( 4 ) 585• -'"— rr, i;i 4k::; >;y;;: 115. 4 4(1RFttiill f 1 '� 11�� 7�. �- � R• 160. t6 Dri: AM .1, 14N `Viltsey Lane City of Shorewood, Minnesota Figure 3 r,va r.00�<,avroerev. as part of this project to insure the future integrity of the finished roadway surface. It is estimated that the installation of this service would cost approximately $1,750. In addition, it is recommended that the existing sanitary sewer main be televised to investigate any potential problems with the sewer main prior to placement of the finished road surface. Costs for televising are estimated at $500. Both of these costs have been separated from the road project costs and would be funded through the City's sanitary sewer fund. 6.3 Watermain Currently, the residents adjacent to Wiltsey Lane are served by their own private wells. At this time, there are no plans for any extensions of the municipal water system. 6.4 Permits / Approvals is The current aggregate surface can be considered relatively impervious. With this in mind and the fact that the roadway surface area will increase only slightly, it is staff's opinion that the runoff rate will not increase significantly from its present rate. Also, the water quality of the runoff should increase with a paved surface since the fines contained within aggregate base should no longer be washed away. Surface runoff from the project will receive some treatment when draining through the ditches. Therefore, onsite ponding should not be required from the watershed district. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is the governing body for surface runoff. The project will be submitted to the watershed district for review and approval. A permit may be necessary from the watershed district since the surface is being upgraded to a paved surface. In addition, due to its close proximity with TH 7, it is recommended that the appropriate Mn/DOT officials be notified of the project for informational purposes. 9 6.5 Right -of -Way / Easements No additional right -of -way and/or easements are anticipated to be acquired on this project. All of the proposed facilities and improvements are located within existing street rights -of -way or existing easements. 7. FINANCING 7.1 Opinion of Probable Cost A detailed Opinion of Probable Cost can be found in the appendix of this report. This opinion incorporates 1998 construction costs and includes a 5 % contingency factor and all related indirect costs. The indirect costs are estimated at 20% and include legal, engineering, administrative and financing items. Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 6 7.2 Funding The total project cost is estimated to be $44,344 with $2,250 being funded Through the sanitary sewer general fund to pay for the new sanitary sewer service and televising. The remaining project balance of $42,094, will be funded through either special assessments, or a combination of the City's Local Roadway Funds and special assessments. The following is a brief description, along with funding alternatives for both funding options. Option 1: Funding for Option 1 considers all of Wiltsey Lane will be assessed against the benefiting properties on a per lot basis, with only the sanitary sewer service and line televising being funded through the General Sewer Fund. This option assumes that only the abutting properties will be benefiting from this improvement, and therefore will be responsible to fund the roadway portion of the project. OPTION 1 Funding for Total Cost Minus Sewer Service Costs Funding Summary Item Total Total Project Project Costs Less Funding Source Costs Sewer Service Special Assessments General Sewer Fund $42,094 $2,250 Street Total $44,344 $42,094 Wiltsey Lane Special Assessments $42,094 _ 5 lots = $8,419 per lot • Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 7 Option 2: Funding for Option 2 considers half of the roadway costs will be assessed against the benefiting properties on a per lot basis, with the remaining portion of the project to be funded by the City's Local Roadway Fund. This option assumes that the north half of the roadway frontage is attributable to the benefiting properties. The other half of the roadway frontage is adjacent State Trunk Highway 7. Therefore, roadway costs would be divided equally between assessments and the City's Local Roadway Fund. • • OPTION 2 Funding for Total Cost Minus Sewer Service Costs Funding Summary Funding Source Total Total Project Local General Project Costs Less Special Roadway Sewer Item Cost Sewer Service Assessments Fund Fund Street Total $44,344 $42 $21,047 $21,047 $2,250 Wiltsev Lane Special Assessments $21,047 - 5 lots = $4,209 per lot Under either option, if the project moves forward, the assessment can be levied against a property for a period of 10 to 15 years, as the City Council desires. Option 3: Option 3 is the "Do nothing alternative." This option depends upon the willingness of the petitioners to move forward with the project based upon the projected costs. liltsey Lane Feasibility Report 0 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION The improvement to Wiltsey Lane consists of approximately 520 feet of roadway reconstruction from a gravel roadway to a bituminous paved surface with minor sanitary sewer adjustments. By paving Wiltsey Lane, the City would recognize lower annual maintenance costs by eliminating general roadway grading, in addition to providing a paved surface which will aid in the melting of ice and snow during the winter months. It is the recommendation of City staff that this city project is feasible from a financial and technical standpoint. Also, it is suggested that this project be tied into another City project, similar in type, which could provide an opportunity for lower unit construction prices which area typically lower on larger projects. We recommend construction of the proposed improvements as detailed in this report and would recommend Option 1 as a mechanism for the financing of this proposed improvement. This option for funding is consistent with the City's practice in the past. Wiltsey Lane Feasibility Report 9 i ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST By: TJG Wiltsey Lane Improvements Ck'd By: DWS Date: 26- May -98 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST MOBILIZATION LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 REMOVE CULVERT FT $6.50 35 $227.50 SAWING BIT, PAVEMENT FT $5.00 60 $300.00 REMOVE PAVEMENT SQ FT $2.00 200 $400.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD $6.00 350 $2,100.00 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD $6.00 400 $2,400.00 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD $9.50 450 $4,275.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD $12.00 400 $4,800.00 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE TON $32.00 150 $4,800.00 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE TON $30.00 230 $6,900.00 STORM SEWER CULVERT FT $30.00 35 $1,050.00 TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER FT $0.80 510 $408.00 INSTALL SEWER SERVICE LUMP SUM $1,759.00 1 $1,759.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $500.00 1 $500.00 SIGNING SQ FT $25.00 25 $625.00 SEEDING ACRE $1,500.00 0.5 $750.00 SODDING SQ YD $3.50 400 $1,400.00 SUBTOTAL $35,194.50 CONTINGENCY 5% $1,759.50 INDIRECT COSTS 20% $7,390.00 TOTAL $44,344.00 • 0 �s MEMORANDUM CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www. state. netlshorewood • cityhall@shorewood.state.net TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works J � DATE: July 9, 1998 RE: Issues and Update Regarding Wiltsey Lane Improvement Project As the City Council is aware, a public information meeting was conducted on June 24` 1998. Five people attended this meeting, none living on Wiltsey Lane. Since that time, Mr. Tom Plantikow (spokesperson for the petitioners) stated that he did not receive enough notice for the public information meeting. Notices were mailed on June 18'' to the surrounding area. Many confirmed having received their notice. Mr. Plantikow was very upset with staff. He feels that staff is trying to hide something about this bow project. On a number of occasions, myself and City Administrator Jim Hurm have offered to reschedule a public information meeting with as much notice as Mr. Plantikow desires. He has refused this offer on at least three occasions. Both myself and Jim tried to determine what would appease Mr. Plantikow to no avail. He claims that he is upset about the following items: 1. The street is not paved like his neighbors. He pays the same taxes and can not understand why their roadway is being treated differently. 2. Mr. Plantikow feels that the City does not maintain his road at all. He does not get plowed in the winter months, and the City does a lousy job of maintaining potholes on the roadway. All of the gravel roadways in Shorewood get graded out in the spring of the year after the frost leaves the ground. This has been sufficient over the years. Mr. Plantikow is not satisfied with that and feels that new gravel should be spread 4 times per year. * PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER c 3. There is an small area in the road approximately 8 inches in width and 2 feet long that collects water near his driveway. Tom is upset because there is water collecting in front of his driveway. It should be noted that the water and small depression is caused due to the irrigation system Mr. Plantikow has installed at the edge of the roadway. Under any circumstances, continuous watering of a single spot on a gravel roadway will lead to a depression. The bottom line is Tom Plantikow is very upset. Efforts to try to inquire how the City can better serve him have lead to comments of "Just fix my roadway now." Both Jim and I tried to find a resolution to appease Mr. Plantikow to no avail. To insure that residents received proper notice of the feasibility report being on Monday's agenda, notices were hand delivered to each mailbox. Mr. Plantikow's notice was handed directly to him in person. Comparision Aggregate Roadway vs Paved Roadway Co of Maintence jr Assume a roadway life of 30 years Aggregate Roadway r Paved Roadway Labor & Equipment Materials Totals Rate Per Cost Per Amount Over Description Hours Hour Quantity Unit Unit Amount 30 Years Grade Every Spring Grader Operator 4 $ 30.00 1,585 Sq Yds $ 0.80 $ 120.00 $ 3,600.00 Patching Grader 4 $ 26.00 $ 104.00 $ 3,120.00 Add Aggregate 2 $ 10.50 30 Cu Yds $ 13.00 $ 390.00 $ 11,700.00 Roller 2 $ 6.50 Total $ 13.00 1 $ 18,420.00 Paved Roadway Labor & Equipment Materials Totals Rate Per Cost Per Amount Over Description Hours Hour Quantity Unit Unit Amount 30 Years Sealcoating Operations (1 every 5 years) Contractual Costs (1 every 5 years) 1,585 Sq Yds $ 0.80 $ 1,268.00 $ 7,608.00 Patching Labor Patching (3 per) 2 $ 90.00 $ 180.00 $ 5,400.00 Skid Steer 2 $ 10.50 $ 21.00 $ 630.00 Roller 2 $ 6.50 $ 13.00 $ 390.00 1 Ton Pickup w / mix 2 $ 2.50 $ 5.00 $ 150.00 Patch mix 1.5 tons $ 20.57 $ 30.86 $ 925.65 Sweeping Labor (1 per) 2 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,800.00 (2 times per year) Sweeper 0.6 $ 20.00 - $ 12.00 $ 360.00 Total $ 17,263.65 t Message Left on the Shoreline June 28, 1998: Hello my name is Lori Utoft, my number is 470 -1530. I live at 6120 Chestnut Terrace. and I am calling because I have some concerns about the road Covington / Old Market area out of Silverwood Park. As you head east out of the park there is no sidewalk whatsoever except this gravel area, and as you head west out of the park there is a beautiful concrete sidewalk and I think there should be a sidewalk from the park up to Vine Hill and then from Vine Hill along the west of Vine Hill to meet up with the other part of the sidewalk that comes along there. I was traveling through that area yesterday and there was a young boy riding his bike through that area on that gravel and lost control and landed on his head. It is not a safe way to travel on that rock. There needs to be sidewalk there and there needs to be safe way for the kids to get to the park. Certainly people do not go as slow at they should on that street, but even so it is a curvy road and hilly and a difficult road to travel safely. I would appreciate if I could hear back from someone about what plans there might be for a sidewalk. I really feel that it is necessary, and if need be, we should get a petition together to find out how many people in this area want a sidewalk. I don't think we should say the whole City doesn't want any sidewalks or trails, or whatever you want to call them. This side of the City may very well need some sidewalks there whereas the older part of the City may not, and I think we should go by the area and the people involved in that area. Thank you. Cal( 6 e c ( P at arr-r� CO Al */o a Message Left on the Shoreline June 30, 1998: Yes, I have two comments to make and the reason I am using the Shoreline is I don't know how to find the right person. First of all, where are the picnic tables in Freeman Park? Are they all in the shelter? Because there are none, I guess there is only one over by the playground area, of the bigger kid playground area, also, along the north side of Keeler Field where there is usually about three tables spread along that path. They are needed. I was there yesterday and people were sitting on the ground because there were no picnic tables around the playground area, it is usually full of mothers and kids and you just have to sit down somewhere. There are two there but that is not enough really. If two families are there, that is it. Could you please spread those around a bit, or maybe we need to buy some new ones. I don't know. But let's get some new ones. Second thing is regarding Eureka Way, a little private road, supposedly private road, past Eureka and it goes back to a couple houses, crosses a trail. Now those people who live on that road want to have it both ways is what the deal is. They want it to be a private road and they don't want you walking up and done it because it is part of their property, but on the other hand, they don't consider it a private road when they want to put out their recycling and garbage. They leave those things at the end of their driveways way up Eureka Way, therefore the BFI truck, the Waste Management truck, the recycling truck, the whole thing, they go up that road, that little Eureka Way, cross the trail, pick up peoples' garbage which should be on Smithtown Road. That is what they should have to do with their garbage and their recycling because if it is a private road then you have to come through it like a private driveway. Anyway then the recycling truck backs up with about four turns onto the trail to turn himself around. You will see the impressions of that big heavy truck on that trail that are there every Wednesday. And if you want to see him do it, he will do it. He must be told to do this by you. I object to this because, I don't know what the deal is, but I object to it. First place I don't like that big heavy truck crossing the trail in the middle of, it is not an intersection, if that is a private road it is not an intersection, and he has to make about four turns to cross that trail. Backing, forward - it is all smushed down there. Those people want to have it both ways and either they have a private road or they don't, and if they have a private road, they should be putting their stuff out onto Smithtown Road. So anyway, if you feel like calling me about this feel free. 474 -4768 and I'm Joyce Holcomb. Thank you. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood • cityhall@shorewood.state.net July 9, 1998 Joyce Holcomb 25675 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Ms. Holcomb: Thank you for your recent message on the Shoreline. We have looked into the matters you have brought to our attention and would like to report back to you as follows. The picnic tables in Freeman Park had been moved to the shelter area during the period of time you referred to in your message to accommodate a large party that had rented the shelter. The tables have been moved back to their respective locations since your call. We hope you find those locations adequate. With regard to Eureka Way, the private road. This essentially is the same as a private drive, and the City does not prohibit vehicular traffic on private property. Vehicles are permitted on this type of property with the permission of the property owner. Unfortunately not all waste haulers have the smaller vehicles to use in locations such as this and you apparently feel this has caused some unnecessary maneuvering across the trail. At this point, the City does not require haulers to pick up refuse with smaller vehicles, but this might be something the Council may consider in the future. Once again, thank you for your comments on the Shoreline. We hope you fmd this an effective means of communication with the City. Sincerely, CITY, FSHOREWOOD eri Naab, Executive Secretary / Deputy Clerk is r�r PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Messages Left on the Shoreline on July 1, 1998: Hi, my name is Becky Schultz, my phone number is 474 -8202. I wanted to comment on the early Shorewood reminisces of Native Americans in the Excelsior area. I was very offended by the column that was in there. I found it to be very racists and not something that we should be purporting. I don't think it is appropriate, I am sure there are other descriptions of Indians that don't describe them as resembling "a horde of demons." I found it very offensive. So if someone wants to call me back about that, that would be fine, my phone number is 474 -8202. I hope to not see anything as insensitive as that again. I sure wouldn't feel comfortable had I been a Native American, I would not like that in our newsletter. Thank you. Response: Jim Hurm met with Ms. Schultz on 718198 to discuss her concerns. Hi, I am calling about the Communications Corner in the July issue of the Citizen's Informer. This was in regards to the lawn chemical and people putting signs up. I think you should next month in addition to that state that, and this can be checked by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) or the Cancer Institute, that 95% of the pesticides used on residential yards are considered probable or possible carcinogens, and that the National Cancer Institute study indicates that children are as much as 6 times more likely to get childhood leukemia when pesticides are used in the home and garden. I think we have become a more educated society and people should not just be thinking "oh gee, are we going to put our signs in our yard ? ", but looking into alternatives. There are a lot of things that are more effective than just dumping more chemicals and we making our soils and grasses chemically dependent and it necessitates more chemical abuse and we all suffer. If you want to respond to me, I am fine with that. My name is Teri Bovey, my number is 474 -8507. Thank you. Response: 718198 Return call made to Ms. Bovey. Staff indicated to her, while we don't try to dictate to people what they can or cannot do on their own private property, we would pass along viable options researched by a recognized source. She will be dropping off some information for the newsletter editor to review and consider. Hi, I am very happy to hear that Shorewood has finally passed a "pooper scooper" law. I am a little concerned that the paragraph regarding enforcement seems a little weak. I highly doubt that a verbal warning is going to discourage people from disobeying the law and if it is just a verbal warning, my question is if it is just a verbal warning is there any record? How will the South Lake Police Department know if there is a repeat violator or blatant offense that causes a citation to be issued if the verbal warnings have never been documented? And I think that fines ought to be set to further discourage persons from violating this law. I do believe it will take a while for people to change the ways that they walk their dogs. My name is Mary and my number is 401 -0010, and I would like a response as to whether or not verbal warnings will be recorded. Response: 718198 Return call me to Mary to inform her that the Police Department does log all verbal warnings given, but these may be difficult to track. However, the officers would remember if a person was a multi - repeat offender. Orono Animal Control did indicate they track verbal warnings. A 4#90i R zt To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: July 8, 1998 Re: Maple Leaf Circle Stop Sign Request I talked with John Swanson to explain that I was bringing the petition before the City Council to discuss the request about not notifying neighbors about the meeting. He stated he doesn't really have a problem with notifying neighbors, it is just that there was no notification some years ago when the stop sign was removed. He further indicated that he would not be here on July 27 and would prefer that the item be placed on the August 10 City Council meeting for action. Background In 1995 Councilmember McCarty indicated to the City Council that she had been approached by a number of Shorewood Oaks residents about moving the stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Maple Leaf Circle to Shorewood Oaks Drive intersection with Oak Leaf Trail. Staff stated at that time that stop signs are not warranted at either . intersection, but if a stop sign were to be placed, a Shorewood Oaks /Oak Leaf Trail intersection is more appropriate because Maple Leaf Circle is a short cul -de -sac. The Council authorized the move. The Council then received a petition requesting that the stop sign be replaced at Maple Leaf Circle. Residents were notified and the Council debated the issue with some residents present. The stop sign was not reinstated. Recommendation: The item should be placed on the August 10 City Council agenda so that the petitioner John Swanson can be present and that a notice go out to those residences that had been notified in 1995, which includes an area beyond the Shorewood Oaks subdivision. That list is included in the packet. -0/bb JOHN W. SWANSON 6050 Maple Leaf Circle Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Phone: 612- 470 -5700 - Fax: 612- 470 -5701 b ,wz.A Il'la.�2 a„� Grcviu� m�m��vi� • �'S"yo-nl. Ct'1+��G�t.YC c= c�a-�t - � i �. �� -=' • ' yA RTC"Nc� w\, E�i r- June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, Name Address Phone Who s7�y June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area 4 0 request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, Name Address Phone 107 1�7 June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, N me Address Phone i 4 7 June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, N N 55331. Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, N e Address Phone p, U June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, I�- (. -��. ST{�YJ �� Address Phone 4� a ) -j55n A June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, Name Address _ ;^ Phone ' �' � U �� `�/' oIB. I t? T Z 1 + w 7 m June 6, 1998 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing concerning the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle. This removal occurred in 1995. The neighbors of the Maple Leaf Circle area request that the sign be replaced. At the time the sign was removed in 1995, over 20 neighbors attended two city council meetings supporting the replacement of the sign. There was no neighbor opposition. Because the previous sign was removed by the city without any notice to the neighbors or meetings, we also ask that the sign be replaced without the necessity of a public meeting. There are 28 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. Also, because of the removal of the stop sign, the middle school bus will not stop at Maple Leaf Circle to pick up or discharge students. We look forward to your timely attention to this matter. Sincerely, e / Address Phone �� r5s �'Y�u�L��f ,Gcs O/- .T REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 24. 1995 - PAGE 6 Mr. Carlson stated he felt there should be one fee for one type of use. The fee should be the same ® for everyone whether they have been in the City or not. He indicated other cities charge so much per linear foot. He felt the Council should investigate what other cities do. Mayor Bean explained the City created a water assessment task force which consisted of the five Councilmembers, Staff and four citizens who were approached and requested to participate. He indicated the formula was derived after hours of debate. He indicated the developers may have to pay initially but ultimately the homeowners pay the assessments. The new homeowners will be able to spread this fee into a 30 year mortgage but the existing homeowners cannot. He explained the concern with the front footage formula is that it would lead to development. He indicated the Council is trying to stay as development neutral as possible. Councilmember Benson excused himself from the meeting at 9:28 p.m. Mayor Bean recessed the meeting at 9:28 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Mr. Bill Diem, 5755 Smithtown Circle, commended the City Council for their diligence. He indicated he thought the progress was necessary. He noted the sewer going to commercial property was six inches in comparison to the line of one inch going to residential properties. He stated he works for a design builder and $5,000 was not an unreasonable assessment. He stated he felt it would be ludicrous to postpone the project. He also indicated there was a law soon to be placed before the City Council which would require mandatory fire protection. If the City was forced to put the water in then, it could result in the loss of competitive bidding. Mr. Diem indicated there were many residents who wished to prepay the assessment but it may be more fair to allow them more than thirty days to do so. Keane indicated the State Statute does not allow the City much flexibility with regard to the payment of the assessments. McCarty moved, Malam seconded to continue the public hearing for public improvements and assessments for the water improvements to Tuesday, July 25, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed 4/0. 7. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS 0 A. Review Status of 1995 Objectives Hurm indicated this report was distributed on a quarterly basis and welcomed any questions the Councilmembers may have. B . Review Staff Recommendation for Placement of Stop Signs - Shorewood Oaks Hurm reported staff concurred with the Police Chiefs recommendation regarding the placement of stop signs in Shorewood Oaks. Councilmember McCarty indicated this placement of the stop signs was what the group was looking for and they would also ask for additional police enforcement. McCarty moved, Stover seconded to direct staff to move the existing stop sign from Maple Leaf Circle westerly to the west intersection of Oak Leaf Trail and Shorewood Oaks Drive. The motion passed 4/0. Keane indicated the redraft of the lease agreement for the Senior Community Center should be circulated to the cities by the end of the week. 9. vIAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS r Ak7: Chief Rick Young at O 61Z- 474 -4477 > 07 -ZO -95 03:01 pm To: City of Shorewood at O 474 -0128 D 001 of 001 SOUTH LAKE MENNI ETONKA PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT R:C A RD A. MUNG Chief of ?c!ica To: James C. Hurm, Cit7 Administrator From, Rice Youn_ Pc =ice Chief Date. Jul Z0, _ ?5 Subject. S GrekoGd Jacs Stop Sens (612) 4 a 4 -3261 M/ Ely thine L7 o -i cr Ye' 1 k Gwn, = do not ief either � o the current �p oC 10n � G 1 � % the �Nar` " ^ ^'G Oi _ Uni form T'_" '1C Contra I O D = ._c? '.Tanua' _C.v_. _ the ?rC =CS 1 D�:Cc a _G. GL sense and Comes :inch lose' _f nc" actual me2ting 111E r arran:s i'v' only cencern �C%ua vauld that �eo 'c do lot 'a-er decide t -e want all three Step sign 'GCatiGns or even "d a forth GCaC 3 :he other InterseC "ion Of r -Wood rlaks Dri.� and Qa:{ Lea Tra_ . m . = 1t _s trade o ,ye have t have the stc? s_ ns some h ere, i t is a good one. Sefviz; So 1:h _3$e Miaa^taaka Coeanzities of Hscetsiaf. Greeavacd, Shafewaad and Taaka Hap 10 To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: July 7, 1995 Re: Review of Shorewood Oaks Stop Signs Currently stop signs are located on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Burlwood Court and Maple Leaf Circle. Councilperson McCarty has been approached by some Shorewood Oaks residents suggesting that the Maple Leaf Circle stop signs be moved westerly to the west intersection of Oak Leaf Trail and Shorewood Oaks Drive. The feeling is that this intersection would serve a greater purpose for stop signs than Maple Leaf Circle because Maple Leaf Circle is a short cul -de -sac where Oak Leaf Trail is a thru street. This proposal is just now being sent on to Department Heads for comment, therefore we would request that no action be taken until a later Council meeting when Department Head input can be considered. 0 cc: Rick Young, Police Chief Brad Nielsen, Planning Director Joel Dresel, City Engineer Dick Mahaffey, Excelsior Fire Chief • Lu ? -��_ 26) 110 .... nos (9) 141 IS 15 61 le 141 36 10) l489 55 E (25) SO 0 10 4 (17) (24) (16) C 7 r 105 (4) 9 13 y 2 1 181 4-3 197.21 64. .07 161.33 100.44 7111, * -... -111, 2& 46 4's. -� 12 14) - n. o I.: --------------- (2 2) 19 (36) 4o 200 ......... i I I I 1- 199. o 8; ---- ------ 502.9 ......... ZQ2. 30 _3 16) (14) ZOO 00 100.T 6 100 1 100 68, 1? �j 13 G a 15) / I o- I 489 28155' -3) (20) (21) (17) .85 4 (35) %n .0 3 X 4 IB d, fql Fl 141 2 30 30 ........... -KI40 (8) (9 6 D-Nwye -5y • 10) 0 1) e too HOREWdW E m K31 100 1 20 132-8 99.6 -L\ -1 TT. ST too A 16 AY 24.32 w." 9& 2 Igg 100 109 .4 ;p ef 6 a 18) rq ft. 129 5 9 to )� (31)� � D 309 (23) 199 30 2) . ...... .41,20 (24) 189. 88 in 12 44 (28) v 8 13 ( 1 9) (44 a 100. too 100 100 190 1 100.75 118.61 C� 5) 223.24 104 too to() 100 100 100 100.1 M. - 115 199.99 50 191.7 f (27) 8 OAKS .9 35 w - . 4 ovE IT 16 IS 14 13 20) 2 '(3 (25)% - _kXd 7 36.05.:, 4 5 d- . , - I. o 39 (38) (37) '36 5 (44) ..OM * to 110 j ' 26) (4 5 ) � ' 100 100 100 too 00 7 - M) 7 I I N8928 5ZI e (43) 2 �d (48) $20. ?7 leg. 63 OAK 15 .21 , (46) 14T 7 100 100 eo. 100 100 too too 100 .08 21 v ,_j 50 50 1 50 �7 (42) 10 . 0 1 'Y v 20 11 52 28 12 13 14 is 16 ,,v 17 18 19 (28) (22) 27) 30 109.88 (49) 51) 52) 53) (54) 55) 59 t 10 i (57) A58) IR 34 50) i 189.88 100 100 100' 1 100 (41) 60.09 .55 iO2.35 IQQ 00 62ND ST. W A July 31. 1995 Dear Shorewood City Council, - - °v The purpose of this letter is to lnforrn7te sitioning of the Shorewood Oaks stop sign, as proposed to the City Council, was NOT supported by the vast majority of the residents of the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood. The original location of the stop sign was on Shorewood Oaks Drive at the intersection of Maple Leaf Circle, where it has been for approximately three years. It has been moved to a new location on Shorewood Oaks Drive at the intersection of Oak Leaf Trail. Actually, most residents in the neighborhood were not even aware that this proposal was before the City Council. Originally the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood began the long process of procuring stop signs at its two cul -de -sacs back in 1991. After several City Council meetings and a petition of signatures from virtually the entire neighborhood, the Council agreed to place stop signs as proposed at the two cul -de -sac locations. This decision was well received by the neighborhood and has not been a point of contention since their placement three years ago. Needless to say, the neighborhood was perplexed to discover this unexpected and unwarranted change in the location of the stop signs. We regret that the city Council would have to be involved in this dispute. But it is important to note that we, the majority of the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood, as well as the City Council were victims of misrepresentation regarding the removal of the stop signs that have served our neighborhood effectively for three years. Therefore, we respectfully ask that the Council return the stop signs to the original location on Shorewood Oaks Drive and Maple Leaf Circle, which were previously established by the Shorewood City Council and supported by the vast majority of Shorewood Oaks residents. Respectfully yours, Concerned Shorewood Oaks residents (see petition) C -- Please note the forty households represented by this petition represent the majority of the residents in the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood (more signatures were potentially obtainable but we didn't pursue this further since this clearly represents the majority of the seventy -two homeowners in Shorewood Oaks). 4 PETITION OF SHOREWOOD OAKS SUBDIVISION - TO SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL We the undersigned residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision would like to request that the STOP SIGN removed from the comer of Maple Leaf Circle and Shorewood Oaks Drive be reinstated._ The removal of the STOP SIGN was done without any request on our part. We would also like to request that in the future notification please be given to us prior to any changes which would affect our traffic flow and our CHILDREN'S SAFETY in this neighborhood NAME (PRINT) ( ADDRESS / PHONE I �CHILDRENI SIGNATURE �u C wo& 1 - c� ��n BiJ�-l�vo0c� �T �,, C�o gu4 2 C'W x( 8crrl 6 0 30 BL,- z A,-z—vi C -r 60to (Z` 62 070 - >> -2 l z a 3 Z Z 7 1 /%"'"Z PETITION OF SI OAKS SUBDIVISION TO SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL We the undersigned residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision would like to request that the STOP SIGN removed from the corner of Maple Leaf Circle and Shorewood Oaks Drive be reinstated. The removal of the STOP SIGN was done without any request on our part. We would also like to request that in the future notification please be given to us prior to any changes which would affect our traffic flow and our CHILDREN'S SAFETY in this neighborhood. NAME (PRINT) I ADDRESS / PHONE 14CHELDRE SIGNATURE J. zY�s J «/� �z n FvrS� L Cwre,CC 1\CpUSj - x,, L ar�tes Ao� �K *A V4 '-,�.L G6 r �G��1C -C2J �'iOrecJGG �C�(�s R63 a, 0 �jd m ftm l l ' 19 5 544"e diS � .7 0 9S -� (,,td. & a 5- 5 c/ 0 d�� c A t -) "w. v • 0 �a��UL C�NgN� A PETITION OF SHOREWOOD OAKS SUBDIVISION - TO SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL We the undersigned residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision would like to request that the STOP SIGN removed from the corner of Maple Leaf Circle and Shorewood Oaks Drive be reinstated. The removal of the STOP SIGN was done without any request on our part. We would also Iike to request that in the future notification please be given to us prior to any changes which would affect our traffic flow and our CHILDREN'S SAFETY in this neiahborhood. . NAME (PRLN U JJ •mil, :.cc.l a r ' `' 1 ti / Z (- , ADDRESS / PHONE I = CHILDREN I SIGNATURE 'ter /l IC-, i0 -1550 ` > , ca L, Z X67 5 (-k) lE Lea {�'tr 2 Z C '2 - '/'1 -L v`� z Y �- Y 7 � ImI �. r� SV6VO Soso ra 4c,�� a n r (ZW & D ri.3. August 11, 1995 Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 !j .4 U G Dear Mayor and Council: I am writing regarding the removal of the stop signs at the corner of Shorewood Oaks Drive P g and Maple Leaf Circle. I came home one day and the stop sign was gone. I said to my wife (Kathie), "someone stole the stop signs." Kathie then told me that the city had removed the signs. I had never heard that the stop signs were on the agenda to be removed or I would have come to you sooner. There are 20 children directly affected by the safety of these signs, not to mention many other children who play on Maple Leaf Circle, but don't live there. I have attached a map showing you where these 20 children live. My question and concerns are: 1. Who requested the removal of the signs, or why were they removed? 2. _ Why were residents not notified that this was being done? 3. How do we get the signs back? Please consider replacing the stop signs. Thank you for the job you do for Shorewood. Sincerely, -�; John Swanson ur) D -690 H x m rt 0 C4 to tr ro a 0 0 rt a 'v H N- ct m CL rt (n CL w h cD 0 rt 0 FREF" PARR 6020 6040 6010 6040 6045 6050. 6030 2 6015 0 6 i0 lk- CO 6050 6055 6060 6045 6025 C13 t q 6065 6070 8 6065 6060 pq ri �o a 6075 a 6080 6085 � ti o °v 0 v N 6070 � U:) w w ' SHOREWOOD OARS DRIVE N N N N N 'n tn to to tn to tn U") Lo 26040 N M TA n .-4 to .-a ff) .--1 ri .--f rn o r 0 to 0 kD t0 tU:) tD t0 W w tD t0 N N N N N N N N N 26395 26345 26030 26300 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6165 26325 1 � rq • � rA 0 0 0 26020 26250 U:) N N N N N N N' 6175 26305 26010 to OAK LEAF TRAIL 6185 h w in N in N to N to � to to to N to in to to in 2060, 6195 o �'� N d' N 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 6 i0 ivMk - - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 14, 199 - PAGE 6 7. CONSIDERATION OF A PETITION TO REPLACE STOP SIGN AT MAPLE LEAF DRIVE. Hurm explained in 1991 the issue was raised regarding traffic control, speed and safety of cars driving through this neighborhood on Shorewood Oaks Drive. He explained there was a series of meetings, a number of reports, a speed study was requested and several options were considered. Initially staff did not recommend a stop sign but City Council installed stop signs at the intersection of Burlwood Court and Shorewood Oaks Drive and the intersection of Maple Leaf Circle and Shorewood Oaks Drive. Hurm stated during the interim a number of new homes have been built on Oak Leaf Trail. Staff has now recommended the stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive be moved west to Oak Leaf Trail. This was recommended due to the increased number of homes on Oak Leaf Trail, the short distance between stop signs and the Chief of Police and City Engineers opinion that the change will bring the stop signs closer to meeting the traffic control warrants. Hurm reported there is now a petition before the City Council to replace the stop signs to their original location. He indicated the City had not fulfilled their responsibility to notify the residents in the area of the change. He reported Catherine Dales, 26085 Oak Leaf Trail, had called the City today to ask that her name be removed from the petition. Councilmember McCarty noted she had talked with residents on Oak Leaf Trail and two of the six who had signed the petition had asked to have their names removed, Catherine Dale and Gela • Kantro. 26205 Oak Leaf Trail. She indicated she should have notified more of the neighborhood of the change. She stated she had been asked by residents to address this issue and had taken into account the safety of the entire neighborhood. She questioned if the suggestion for curve signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak Leaf Trail, with recommended reduced speeds, was a valid option. Councilmember Stover reported in 1991 there was discussion regarding the curve and reduced speed signs but they were discouraged because the suggested speed was not enforceable but only recommended. It was also suggested the signs may only detract the driver's vision. She indicated in 1991 there was a lot of discussion and much written information provided that is not included in the Council meeting minutes. She stated the Council was strongly encouraged by the professional staff involved, to choose only two spots for the stop signs to be placed. Guadalupe Pfaff, 6075 Maple Leaf Circle, stated that three weeks ago, stop si were moved in the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood without any notification to the residents. She asked who had made the recommendation to remove stop signs after three years. She stated the number of . children in the neighborhood has grown from 78 to 130. She believed the neighborhood needed more safety measures rather than less. Councilmember McCarty stated she had been asked by residents to investigate if the stop signs were in the most appropriate location. Hurm explained that the Police Chief states in his memo that the new location of the stop signs comes much closer to meeting the uniform traffic control warrants. Ms. Pfaff stated it appeared the Police Chief was against the stop signs originally. She stated Shorewood Oaks Drive is used as a cut through and there are many small children in the area. She asked if the speed limit could be reduced. She stated the neighborhood needs more safety measures installed rather than removed. Hurm explained stop signs are not recommended as speed control devices. He stated the best speed control device was to have a police officer in the area more often. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 14, 1995 - PAGE 7 Ms. Pfaff disagreed. She stated with the stop signs moved, traffic is flying by her home at high speeds. Councilmember Malam indicated when the speed study was performed in 1991, the recorded average speed was 30 miles per hour. Ms. Pfaff asked why the City took away what stop signs the neighborhood had. She indicated with the new developments in the area there was much more traffic. She indicated 50% of the residents in the neighborhood signed the petition. Councilmember McCarty stated the stop signs had not been taken away but rather had only been moved down two houses. She stated it was equitable to have two stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive and two stop signs on Oak Leaf Trail. Ms. Pfaff again indicated there had been increased speeding since the stop signs were moved. She indicated it was not good government the way the stop signs were removed and she felt there was no actual basis for their removal. She stated that first and foremost the speed limit in the area needs to be reduced. Mayor Bean stated the Council is very concerned with the safety of the children in the streets of Shorewood but Minnesota Statute states that 30 miles per hour is the lowest enforceable speed limit. Councilmember Stover noted the City cannot lower the speed limit without State authority. If the City did, the speed limit would not be enforceable. She explained the State determines the speed limit based upon the construction of the street, the side vision, etc. Mayor Bean stated the speed limit on this street was not the issue before the Council tonight. The issue was would moving the signs bring a balance in traffic control. Ms. Pfaff asked if the City had completed a study that showed the new location of the stop signs would be more effective than the previous location and why an additional stop sign could not be added. Mayor Bean stated the decision was based on the feelings and experience of the South Lake Police 40 Department and a significant volume of information from MNDOT. He indicated there should not be two stop signs in such close proximity of one another. Mayor Bean explained the City had to work within constraints of the State Legislature. He urged Ms. Pfaff to contact her State Legislators and urge them to give the authority to set speed limits to the local government. Councilmember McCarty suggested the stop signs be left where they presently are and the issue tabled for three months. Councilmember Stover agreed, indicating during that period of time, a police officer could be requested to be in the area more often and record data to be compared with data acquired when the stop signs were in their previous location. A decision would then be made if the stop signs would stay where they are currently located or moved back to their previous location. Mayor Bean suggested a traffic counter also be placed at each of the intersections. Mayor Bean suggested the State could also be asked to come and evaluate the speed study again. Tom Rendos, 6040 Maple Leaf Circle, suggested this study be performed but then the stop sign be replaced to its previous location and another study be performed. He felt this would show if the stop sign actually did split the traffic. Councilmember Stover indicated the City already had data from the previous location of the stop signs. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 14, 1995 - PAGE 8 Mr. John Swanson, 6050 Maple Leaf Circle, confirmed that the Council had received his letter. He added residents in favor of moving the stop signs should be in attendance at the meeting. Mayor Bean recessed the meeting at 9:36 p.m. and reconvened at 9:38 p.m. Mr. Swanson indicated he did not want to see the neighbors at odds with each other. He stated Oak Leaf Trail was a winding road and there was not as much likelihood of speeding on that road. He asked that the stop sign be replaced to its previous location and the study performed at that time. Bean moved, Benson seconded to table the issue of replacing the stop sign at Maple Leaf Drive until November 13, 1995. Motion passed 510. McCarty moved, Benson seconded to request the State of Minnesota perform a speed evaluation throughout the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood, specifically Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak Leaf Trail. Motion passed 510. The Council directed staff to request the Shorewood Lakes Police Department to establish a monitor in the Shorewood Oaks neighborhood with a mechanic traffic counter. Mr. Kurt Pfaff, 6075 Maple Leaf Circle, expressed his concern that the study be based on objective data rather than subjective data. He suggested if the monitors were visible, it may affect the results. Mayor Bean recessed the meeting at 9:52 p.m. and reconvened at 10:00 P.M. 8. PRESENTATION E HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ON JOINT WATER QUALITY STUDY Debra Borkon, 5590 Shore Road, and John Joseph, 6290 Ridge Road, were in attendance to discuss the need for a high water quality study on Christmas Lake. Mr. Joseph explained the purpose of the study would be to collect historical data, prioritize future projects, and obtain funding for projects through State or Federal sources. He explained this would be a cooperative effort between the City of Chanhassen, the City of Shorewood and the Christmas Lake Homeowners' Association. He stated the project would begin in 1996 and he was asking the City to contribute $1,700 to the project. There was Councif consensus that this was a worthwhile project. Benson moved, McCarty seconded to place $1,700 in the 1996 City budget for a Joint Water Quality Study on Christmas Lake. Motion passed 510. 9. ESTABLISHING HING N A POLICY ALLOWING OR PREPAYMENT ORDINANCE OF A ESTABLIS PORTION OF THE WATERMAIN ASSESSMENT. Rolek explained, per Council direction, a draft ordinance has been prepared to allow partial prepayments of the watermain assessment. He explained the three conditions for prepayment were that the prepayment must be made to the City Finance Director; partial prepayments could be made no more than once per year; and partial prepayments can be no less than 20% of the original assessment. MAYOR Robert Bean COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bruce Benson Jennifer McCarty Doug Malam CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 August 24, 1995 Dear Shorewood Oaks Resident: Enclosed for your information is an excerpt of draft minutes from the City Council's regular meeting of August 14, 1995 when the issue of stop signs in your neighborhood was discussed. As you may be aware, 1991 a petition was received by the City Council which requested additional stop signs in the area 'a reduction of the speed limit to 15 mph, and installation of "Slow Children at Play" signs. In response to this petition and following a speed study in the area, NIINDot reported "we recommend continued reliance on Minnesota's statutory 30 mph urban district speed limit ". They also recommended the Slow Children signs not be posted. City staff recommended against placement of stop signs as requested because they did not meet stop sign criteria. Following review of the data collected at that time, the City Council directed installation of stop signs at the intersection of Maple Leaf Circle and Burlwood Court with Shorewood Oaks Drive. In June of this year, City staff was directed by the Council to determine if the stop sign at the Maple Leaf Circle intersection could more closely meet warrants by moving it westerly to the intersection of Oak Leaf Trail, which is now fully developed with new homes. It was determined that while neither location meets warrants for a stop sign, the Oak Leaf Trail intersection more closely meets those warrants. The Council's goal is to reduce speed by more visibility and traffic enforcement by police, and to have Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak Leaf Trail share as equally as possible in traffic volume. The City also acknowledges poor communication on our part before action affecting the entire neighborhood was taken. Following the moving of the signs, several area residents contacted City Hall to inquire about the change in location, and a petition was presented to the City Council requesting that the stop sign removed from the corner of Maple Leaf Circle and Shorewood Oaks Drive be reinstated. In response, City Council has directed the following actions: • Table the issue of replacing the stop sign at Maple Leaf Circle until November 13, 1995; • Request a speed evaluation from the State of Minnesota; • Request additional monitoring from the Police Department; and • Use mechanical traffic counters in the area for the collection of data. During this interim period, City staff will collect the requested data for the Council to consider at their November 13 meeting. We will do a better job of keeping you informed. Sincerely, OF SHOD EWOOD' James C. Hurm, City Administrator Enclosure A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Thomas Tritch Mr. & Mrs. Dean Johnson 4669 Park Arcadia Dr 5875 Cathcart Dr San Jose, CA 95136 Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 34 0044 32- 117 -23 31100 Robert Wheland Naomi Carlson 5910 Cathcart Dr 5955 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 310005 32- 117 -23 310014/15 P J Wartman Norbert Blaschko 5840 Cathcart Dr 5870 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 32 0004 32- 117 -23 32 0005 SS Biggers /CA Berg Edward Zembrycki 5970 Cathcart Dr 243 Water St Shorewood, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 32 0018 32- 117 -23 33 0019 George & Leslie Gleason Andrew Meldahl 6130 Cathcart Dr 6180 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 33 0037 32- 117 -23 33 0035 Jeff & Jodi Honickel Richard & Kathy Lewis 6095 Cathcart Dr 6065 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 34 0056 32- 117 -23 34 0047 GM English/TN Berlind Harvey Pierce 6035 Cathcart Dr 1342 Boundary Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Middleton, WI 53562 32- 117 -23 34 0040 32- 117 -23 34 0039 Mr. & Mrs. Moore 5905 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 310007 Kenneth Riedel 5995 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 310013 Freddie Nephew 5890 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, Mlv 55331 32-117-23 32 0006 David Dahl 6100 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MIN 5533I 32-117-23 33 0036 Steve Korin/Jane Smith 6135 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 32-117-23 34 0003 Richard & Karin Fyhrlund 67075 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 34 0041 Russell & Lynn Pauly • 6085 Cathcart Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 32- 117 -23 34 0048 w Blaine & Jan Conant 26050 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Thomas/Susan Abrahamson 26020 Shorewood Oaks Dr *Shorewood, MN 55331 Res�de�t 2600�Shorewo aks Dr Sh om wood. MN 331 D.A. Boismier 26050 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood, MN 55331 0 Tirnothy & Lois Silvers 26065 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood, MN 55331. 11 Brad & JuIie Greiner Bart Chiotti 26040 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26030 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MIN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Peter Buonomo The Great Stock 26010 Shorewood Oaks Dr Corporation ( Shorewood, MN 55331 13009 Diamond Path vVest ( Apple Valley, MN 5512 Michael & Janice Thibado Donald & Dianne Aslesen 26075 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26055 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 S.L. Kent James & Nancy Heinz 26050 Oak Leaf Trail 26070 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood, MN 5533I Shorewood, MN 55331 Gary Begin Resident 5709 Lake Sarah Heizhts 26045 Oak Leaf Trail Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Rockford, MN 55373 • w Dave & Sheila Halbmaier Jeff & Patricia Tuma Kree & Lisa Levine 26395 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26345 Oak Leaf Trail 263'55 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Michael & Mary Baraa David & Karen Aubrev Russ & Lvnn Kirchhoff 26305 Oak Leaf Trail 26285 Oak Leaf Trail' 26265 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 James & Joan Gemmill J & E Haesler D & G Kantro 26245 Oak Leaf Trail 26225 Oak Leaf Trail 26205 Oak Leaf Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN ..55331 ` Trail Shorewood, M_N JJJ3I Richard Havron 26185 Oak Leaf Trail Dou a�& Ga tpley 1830 Priory LXtne Resident 26165 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood. MN 55331 Iviirtttet nka D�1 5 Shorewood, MINI 55331 T & L Wanner T & S Wiese Paul & Heidi Snede 26145 Oak Leaf Trail 26125 Oak Leaf Trail 26105 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood, MIN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55:31 Shorewood. MN 5533I M & C Dales L.J. Kapustka M.H. Radcliffe 26085 Oak Leaf Trail 26400 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26400 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Michael & Lorilee Virnis! Kevin & Sally Greer Robert & Jennifer McCarn 26380 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26360 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26340 Shorewood Oaks E r Shorewood, MN 55331 _ Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 James & Lauri Roberts James & Jacqueline Lund Eric & Catherine Paul 26320 Shorewood Oaks Dr 6070 Maple Leaf Circle 6060 Maple Leaf Circle Shorewood, NLN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Kathryn & John Swanson Thomas & Nancy Rendos Eberhard & Janice Gabriel 6050 Maple Leaf Circle 6040 Maple Leaf Circle 6045 Maple Leaf Circle Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Ray & Angela McMullen Mark & Sandra Schuehle Kurt & Guadalupe Pfaff 6055 Maple Leaf - Circle 6065 Ma Leaf Circle 6075 Maple Leaf Circle Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 M Marti & Laura Johnson Dennis & Sande Thiesse Ben & Catherine Arrioia 6050 Burlwood Court 6070 Burlwood Court 6060 Burlwood Court Shorewood, MN 15331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Daniel & Christine Stein Blair & Sharon Bury Paul Steffens 6050 Burlwood Court 6040 Burlwood Court 26250 Oak Leaf Trait Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 5_ Charles Panacopoulos William & Mary Colopoulos Pat & Mary Hadapp 26300 Oak Leaf Trail 26215 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26195 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 5533I James & Brenda Pisula 26175 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Stephen/ Gina Hertzenbery 26115 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 55331 Kent & Julie Forss Stephen & Diane Klimowicz 26155 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26135 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood, MN 5533I Shorewood, MN 55331 Paul & Susan Liliezren David Setterholm 26095 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26090 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood. INN 55 Shorewood, MN 55331 S & G Gray Dean & Jeanine Weisbeck G & M Mazzoni 26110 Oak Leaf Trail 26130 Oak Leaf Trail 26150 Oak Leaf Trail Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331. & M, atthew & Amy Keller ; Frederick Buie Richard & Connie Etshokin 2170 Oak Leaf Trail 26190 Oak Leaf Trail 6030 Burlwood Court Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Mark & Kathleen Willemsen John & Holly Babbs Paul & Bever]v Krueger 6020 Burlwood Court 6010 Burlwood Court 6015 Burlwood Court Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Daniel & Kelly Stoks John & Ellen Jordano James & Doris Mierendorf 6025 Burlwood Court 6045 Burlwood Court 6065 Burlwood Court Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Timothy & Mary Morin William Tiede Cvnthia SchIick 6085 Burlwood Court 26060 Shorewood Oaks Dr 26060 Shorewood Oaks Dr Shorewood. MN 56331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Shorewood. MN 55331 Dean Johnson Richard Moore Robert Whelan 5073 Cathcart Drive 5905 Cathcart 5925/5910 Cathcart Drive Shorewood M-N 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Naomi Carlson P. J. Wartman Norbert Blaschko 5975/95 Cathcart Drive 5840 Cathcart Drive 5870 Cathcart Drive Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Freddie Nephew Alan Lizee Melvin Ostwald 5890 Cathcart Drive 27055 Smithtcwn Road 5970 Cathcart Drive Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 G.M. English T.N. Berlind R.L. Fvhrlund R.G. Lewis 6035 Cathcart Drive_ 6075 Cathcart Drive 6065 Cathcart Drive Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood b 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Siegfried Weissner Gerald Albrecht Thomas Hines 26780 Smithtown Road 6015 Cajed Lane 6045 Cajed Lane Shorewood MST 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 T -m°thv Trapp Peter A. Holmberg Earl G. Bakken 5985 Cajed Lane 5955 Cajed Lane 6040 Cajed Lane Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood M.N 55331 Shorewood MN 5533 - Chervl Sass J. A. Burnett -Clapp John J. Coverdaie 26860 Beverly Drive 26900 Beverly Drive 26930 Beverly Drive Shorewood MIN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MgT 55331. Jill Gilbertson Dale Newberg Tony Pink Mark Kasperek 26960 Beverly Drive 27000 Beverly Drive 27170 Beverly Drive Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Shorewood M.N 55331 Chris & Brad Farr 27175 Beverly Drive James Lindell John Steinhibel Shorewood, P "N 55331 27125 Beverly Drive 27075 Beverl Drive y Shorewood MY 55331 Shorewood MN 55331 Steven Haeg Jeff Wingfield Enrique Rodriguez 27015 Beverly Drive Shorewood MN 5531 26975 Beverly Drive 26925 Beverly D rive Shorewood MN 5533- Shorewood MN 55331 To: Rick Young, Police Chief From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: August 24, 1995 Re: Shorewood Oaks Traffic Study Enclosed you will find an exc petition the e � toe stopsign ived a pe replac Maple Leaf Circle and meeting the Council rece ed staff Shorewood Oaks Drive. After much discussion on this subject, the Council direct to do the following: • Table the issue of replacing the stop sign at Maple Leaf Circle until November 13, 1995; • Request a speed evaluation from the State of Minnesota; • Request additional monitoring from the Police Department; and • Use mechanical traffic counters in the area for the collection of data. Please arrange to provide the additional patrol coverage in this area. We will arrange with. � the City Engineer for the use of two mechanical traff c counters. However, we may want to use the radar unit in this area in the future. All information collected and staff recommendations will be presented to the City Council at their meeting of November 13. Kristi Stover indicated at the Council meeting that data has been collected on the effect of the stop signs since installed in 1991. Please submit any information you may hav collected regarding this issue since that time. • 11- OF MAYOR Robert Bean COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bruce Benson Jennifer McCarty Doug Maiam .CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 • (612) 474-3236 August 29, 1995 Mr. Ed Brown Senior Engineer Traffic Minnesota Department of Transportation 5801 Duluth Street Third Floor Golden Valley -, MN 55422 Re: Speed Zone Study Deals Mr. Brown, On August 28, 1995 the Shorewood City Council passed Resolution No. 95 -75, "A Resolut -on Requesting a Speed Zone Study on Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak Leaf Trail, Public Streets in the Citv of Shorewood ". We are enclosing a cony of the resolution. Please initiate an engineer and traffic investigation to determine the proper speed for this area, prepare the results of this study and forward to us as soon as possible. Should you have any questions or concerns please call me_ Thank you. Sincerely, TTY OF SHOREWOOD ames C. Hurm, City Administrator Enclosure cc: Brad Nielsen, Planning Director Ed DeLaForest, City Engineer Don Zdrazil, Public Works Director Richard Young, Police Chief 0 A Resident Community on Lake Minneronka's South Shore a oF TF►� September 1 1995 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Golden Valley Office 2055 North Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Mr. James C. Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 -8927 Re: Speed Zoning - City of Shorewood Shorewood Oaks Drive, Oak Leaf Trail Dear Mr. Hurm: laced on our agenda Speed zoning studies for the above referenced roads have been p Council as requested in your August 19 letter to Ed Brown and in within he next two to Resolution No. 95 -75. The studies are expected to be com three weeks. to necessary for the studies has been collected and eva land Oak Leaf As soon as all da contact you to discuss possible speed limits for Shorewood Oaks a scus lease direct any questions or additional information concerning Trail. In the me P the studies to either Ed (797 - -3126) at 3129) or myself (797 his ted on the nce lease note that we have moved to he be sent address Sectfy to me. For future refere p re nests letterhead. Also, we suggest that future speed zoning q Guit ig so wi a,it�id oily (JiusSiuie u 6iay caused by fvr4vG� ung of the reque��. Sincerely, Michael T. Schadegg "` t Traffic Studies Supervisor _:- , r.i . MTS:p I:EB • 0 An Equal 0j_)por[Flrr1r,7 E tc"` tt% �i To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: July 9, 1998 Re: Schedule of Council Work Sessions cc: Department Heads, Planning and Park Commissions This is a list of and topics which have been identified for work sessions. n * Work Session to follow regularly scheduled meeting ** Potential Dates and Issues for Work Session Topics �io� 1998 Schedule of Work Sessions Scheduled Date: Topic: * 7/27 Natural Resources Section of Comprehensive Plan 8/3 Home Occupation Permits (CUP review) Disaster Preparedness Policy Surve * 8/10 CIP Sump Pump Ordinance 8/17 CIP Assessor Interviews * 8/24 1999 Budget Review 8/31 Meet with Telecommunications Consultant on Towers CIP/Budget * * Park Festival ** Discussion on Metropolitan Council * Work Session to follow regularly scheduled meeting ** Potential Dates and Issues for Work Session Topics �io� • CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JULY 13, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 24, 1998 Page 1 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT 23254 PERA PERA $3,013.77 23255 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCOMP 1,203.07 23256 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 1,100.77 23257 ANOKA CO SUPPORT /COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID 156.50 23258 MN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD 1,489.63 23259 EXC. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 1,000.00 23260 GOVT. FINANCE OFFICERS ASSO CERT. OF ACHIEVE. REVIEW FEE 350.00 23261 KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMS. 192.30 23262 PATRICIA HELGESEN SEC 125 REIMS. 200.73 23263 MN CITY /CO MGMT ASSOC. ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 70.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES AIRTIME 188.68 • 23264 23265 MN BOARD OFAELSLAGID RENEW PE LICENSE -L BROWN 70.00 23266 THERESA NAAS SEC 125 REIMS. 190.78 23267 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 2,435.28 23268 JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE 72.64 23269 ALAN ROLEK CONFERENCE EXPENSES 289.00 23270 STATE OF WI, DEPT OF REG/LIC RENEW PE LICENSE -L BROWN 43.00 23271 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS /ADVERTISING 1,444.00 " 23272 RONALD HUME REFUND PARK/SW FEES 2,000.00 23273 SALLY HUNNER ESCROWREFUND 7,500.00 23274 DEAN JOHNSON ESCROWREFUND 100.00 23275 VIRGINIA SVOBODA ESCROWREFUND 100.00 23276 BELLBOY CORP. LIQUOR PURCHASE 1,737.74 23277 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC/SUPPLY PURCHASE 118.70 23278 23279 DAHLHEIMERDIST. BEER PURCHASE 1,038.75 GRIGGS, COOPER &CO. LIQUORIWINE/MISC PURCHASE 3,299.08 23280 JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO. WINE PURCHASE 3,825.49 23281 LAKE REGION VENDING MISC PURCHASE 919.84 23282 LEEFBROS. MATS 26.20 23283 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 189.60 23284 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY WINE/BEER PURCHASE 559.40 23285 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS WINE PURCHASE 1,148.80 23286 THE WINE COMPANY WINE PURCHASE 216.00 23287 US POSTMASTER JULY NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 547.06 23288 US POSTMASTER 2ND QTR U/B POSTAGE 490.20 23289 PERA JULY PERA LIFE INSURANCE 3 3.0 0 23290 MEDICA JULY HEALTH INSURANCE 5,426.00 23291 HEALTHPARTNERS JULY HEALTH INSURANCE 3,358.12 23292 MN MUTUAL LIFE JULY DISABILITY 94.50 23293 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE JULY LIFE INSURANCE 93.00 23294 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 JULY DELTA DENTAL 281.84 Page 1 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JULY 13, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 24, 1998 Page 2 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT 23295 HENN CO TREASURER MAY PRISONER EXPENSE $56.00 23296 JAMES HURM MILEAGE/EXPENSES 87.16 23297 THERESA NAAB MILEAGE/TUITION REIMB. 499.54 23298 NAIL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION FRIENDS OF TREE CITY USA 15.00 23299 CITY OF TONKA BAY JULY RENT -TB LIQ 1,000.00 23300 WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE REMOVAL 512.12 23301 MINNEWASHTA CHURCH ESCROWREFUND 2,225.00 23302 ROBERT H. MASON, INC. BONDS 61,65,69,73 & 77 46,650.90 23303 TRIVESCO BONDS 64,68,72 & 76 37,320.72 23304 MR. PAUL STEINER BONDS 63,67,71 & 75 37,320.72 23305 MARK Z. JONES BONDS 62,66,70,74 & 78 46,650.90 23306 MINNEWASHTA PTO PLAYGROUND EQUIP DONATION 3,000.00 23307 GRIFFIN COMPANIES JULY RENT -LIQ 1 7,118.50 23308 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 36.80 23309 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS LIQUORNVINE PURCHASES 3,098.25 23310 TOWLE REAL ESTATE JULY RENT -LIQ II 3,590.45 23311 PERA PERA 2,972.07 23312 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCOMP 1,253.07 23313 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 1,100.77 23314 ANOKA CO SUPPORT /COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT C. SCHMID 156.50 23315 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 UNION DUES 139.80 23316 MN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD 1,424.43 23317 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER 393.94 23318 CONNIE BASTYR TUITION REIMB.- SCANNING 148.09 23319 KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB 192.30 • 23320 BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB 140.00 23321 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 3,637.02 23322 JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE 59.09 23323 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 35.23 23324 ALAN ROLEK SEC 125 REIMB. 100.00 23325 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 188.74 23326 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS SUPPLY PURCHASE 65.50 23327 BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR PURCHASE 6,948.81 23328 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISC/SUPPLY PURCHASE 854.20 23329 DAHLHEIMER DIST. INC. BEER PURCHASE 669.00 23330 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER/MISCPURCHASE 6,818.85 23331 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING 56.85 23332 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. LIQUOR/WINE/MISCPURCHASE 12,078.23 23333 JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR LIQUOR/WINEBEER PURCHASE 13,177.98 23334 LAKE REGION VENDING MISC PURCHASE 1,180.00 23335 MARKVII BEER/MISCPURCHASE 7,566.42 Page 2 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JULY 13, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 24, 1998 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT 23336 MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT 324.00 23337 NORTH STAR ICE MISC PURCHASE 946.98 23338 PAUSTIS WINE CO. WINE PURCHASE 151.00 23339 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS LIQUOR/WINE/MISC PURCHASE 9,597.66 23340 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASE 616.04 23341 THORPE DIST. BEER/MISC PURCHASE 24,857.45 23342 THE WINE CO. WINE PURCHASE 312.05 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED • Page 3 Page 4 ........ ........ . .... .. !j t: 1 .... ..... ' I i 1 4 11 1 1 t 0 j 14 1— }':':i C ' s V I l "i N, Mit 1 1 f:; 1 . Li. : ..! f ;-4 i - i : .'! " 1 j,: ! M f, ;1 1:; T i T i f •i A M I N 1 C. 1 0 L I F: 1 E l_. L, EIC"I 'IS. F K/ PA I L 'S 1 1 f ilk Y +.. ..,,_.`.i 3 C y C, T N" C. y 1C. Ll N 4 i) f F U E L C1 F CA' R el. .. 9 Z Z P UM I 'SU.Pf L_1-`H:',S I - i - I - - y a F,." 2 9 i (Di SUI P Y CO ?T j.- ISLANIC) 1 U U-i". 2, Ke` R. j R`OD SHOP LIE:_1 C.1 TY 20,B., iL Mf,*.)j-4 t, 'j C J* i-Jif 4, • 3 6 3 ME.: 1*N`!C! CJC*1U1t1, 1","Y' 1IR C) H M E i U NIE SAC I U ic tJ _5 i s 1 Page 4 Page 5 J. !J p 8 W i-Af �lj q Ij 8 J N, i-j 1 1 y U is �. I'D .� ... ---- - - ---- - t K 3 11-1 E' W NIG 6' 9 K Ef -50 !"i i:' y i y 7 t:q M. y ( GIIS ASS"Zi 2 C 'a- ✓N u I" u "'IV KE 1 .1 (U I i SEIF"` 1 C.' PIL 11.1 c I f�', C.- J J t.11 I 11? kT U". A M A C-I. D 61 Sf L L- k' - Ci R '/ CI C) C' 1 T -1 '- SUDR V IUM11P HSE il. T Ft'. DE iM 2 5 "i 5 S T j�j ;'.I i C! 31.4. U i �D T . ^ l!! " fI fy lu UN j j ' i j , f,-,t It Page 5 TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 462,445.13 a Page 6 ... .... .... .... ! U 1j ill, i 1'+1 il 6 Y i V Y•4 I /,1 V W Q ! .. - !:.l !.J f e� ... .... .... . j . ... ... 1 ,2 1 Z) �D -. 1 4 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 462,445.13 a Page 6 Page 7 C H E C K R_ G E 5 T E f-'% CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT CON 6 25 98 110 CONNIE D. BAS TYR 213069 606-24 CON 6 23 98 115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN 213070 1521.76 CON 6 23 98 150 HEATHER A. BLECHTA 213071 147.4. CON 6 23 98 170 RYAN C. BLECHTA 213072 128.7.5 CON 6 23 98 300 ROGER 0. CHAMPA 213073 184. 70 CON 6 23 98 325 ANGELA M. COLE 2130i4 664 7 CON 6 23 98 350 THOMAS A. DAHLBERG 213075 230.87 MAN 6 23 98 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 213118 906.94 CON 6 25 98 810 MICHAEL R. FIELDS 213077 544.77 CON 6 23 98 1100 JOHN J. GARFUNKEL 213018 184.70 CON 6 23 98 1160 TWILA R. GROUT * 213079 531-03 CON 6 23 98 1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 213080 507.28 CON 6 23 98 1400 PATRICIA R- HELGESEN 213081 523.61 cum 6 23 98 1410 PAMELA j- HELLING 213082 555-46 CON 6 25 98 1430 KELLY M. HENTGES 213085 321.05 CON 6 23-98 1550 JAMES C. HURM 213084 1!2 9 1.0 CON 6 23 98 1575 TROY M. IVES 213085 17 3 3-5 CON 6 23 98 1601 BRIAN D. JAKEL 213086 103-44 CON 6 25 98 1100 JEFFREY A. JENSEN 21308i 957.12 CON 6 23 98 1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON 213088 919.62 cum 6 23 98 1810 ERICA E. JOHNSON 213089 401.59 CON 6 23 98 1950 MARTIN L. JONES 213090 25.2.5 CON 6 23 98 2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 213091 629-15 CON 6 23 98 2495 MOLLY D. LATTERNER 213092 62.51 CON 6 23 98 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 213093 664.75 CON 6 23 98 2SOO JOSEPH P- LUGOWSKI 213094 879.1-5 CON 6 23 98 2805 JASON R. LUND 213095 276.42 CON 6 23 98 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 213096 28-79 CON 6 23 98 2910 BRADLEY j. MASON 213097 810-96 CON 6 23 98 3000 THERESA L. NAAB 213098 610-12 CON 6 25 98 3100 LAWRENCE A. NICCUM 215099 1151.34 CON 6 23 98 3200 ANTHONY L. NICOLI 213100 544-77 MAN 6 23 98 3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN 215067 904-90 CON 6 23 98 3430 GERALD A. O'NEILL 213101 184.70 CON 6 23 98 3500 JOSEPH E. PAZANDAK 213102 1116-77 CON 6 23 98 5.580 CHRISTOPHER J. POUNDER 213103 949.62 COM 6 23 98 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 213104 955.15 CON 6 23 98 3650 BRIAN L. RIENSTRA 213105 51.72 CON 6 23 98 3701 BRIAN M. ROERICK 213106 62-62 CON 6 23 98 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 213107 1150-63 CON 6 23 98 3815 MICHAEL J. RUFFENACH 213108 266.47 CON 6 23 98 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 213109 462-09 CON 6 23 98 3910 R CONRAD SCHMID 213110 38-79 CON 6 23 98 4050 BERNARD J. SCHNURR 213111 116.26 CON 6 23 98 4175 ANDREW R. SMITH 213112 88.88 CON 6 23 98 4200 BRENDA L. LUKE 213113 125.49 CON 6 23 98 - 4250 JON T. SPICER 213114 51-72 CON 6 23 98 4500 KRISTI STOVER 213115 134. 71.', CON 6 23 98 4575 REBECCA A. TARVIN 213116 118.47 CON 6 23 98 4900 DEAN H. YOUNG 215117 26-29 COMPUTER CHECKS 22543.42 MANUAL CHECKS 1811.84 Page 7 E 0 CHECK REGISTEi CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME TYPE DATE NUMBER NOTICES OF DEPOSIT : **=TOTALS"** Page 8 CHECK NUMBER CHECK AMOUNT . 00 24355.26 COMPUTER CHECKS 22884.72 MANUAL CHECKS NOTICES OF DEPOSIT ****TOTALS**W;ic 22884-12 Page 9 0 CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT C-Oill 7 07 98 109 EMILY G BASTYR 213121 i5-59 CON 7 07 98 110 CONNIE 0. BAS TYR 213122 533 . 6 CON ?, 07 98 115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN 213123 1521.35 f"-OM 7 07 98 150 HEATHER A. BLECHTA 213124 188.68 C Q M 7 07 98 160 PA RICE A. BLECHTA 213125 38.79 CON 7 07 98 170 RYAN C. BLECHTA 213126 48. 4-8 C 0 r" 7 07 98 325 ANGELA M. COLE 213127 664.75 CON 7 07 98 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 213128 750.79 CON 7 07 98 810 MICHAEL R. FIELDS 213129 503.02 CON 7 07 98 1160 TWILA R. GROUT 215130 582.55 CON 7 07 98 1170 MICHELLE K. HAMMER 213131 ISO. 30 CON 7 07 98 1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 213132 506.77 CON 7 07 98 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 213133 529.31 CON 7 07 98 1410 PAMELA J. -HELLING 213134 520.35 CON 7 07 98 1430 KELLY M. HEN TGES 213135 163. %C CON 7 07- '•X8 1550 JAMES C. HURM 213136 1721.90 CON 7 07 98 1575 TROY M- !YES 213137 40.41 CON 7 07 98 1601 BRIAN D. JAKEL 213138 100.20 CON 7 01 98 1700 JEFFREY A. JENSEN 215132 982.17 CON 7 07 98 1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON 215140 901.37 CON 7 ov 98 1810 ERICA E. JOHNSON 213141 335.61 CON v 07 98 1999 KELLY F. JOSEPHSON 213142 116.36 CON 7 0? 98 2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 213143 629.7.5 CON 7 07 98 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 213144 664-75 CON 7 0 */ 98 2800 JOSEPH P. LUG- 213145 821-58 C li H, *1 07 98 2•05 JASON R- LUND 213146 247.61 CON 7 07 98 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 213147 19 - 0 CON 7 07 98 2910 BRADLEY J. MASON 213148 723-93 CON 7 07 98 3000 THERESA L. HAAS 213149 601.63 CON 7 07 98 3100 LAWRENCE A. HICCUM 213150 1151-14 CON 7 07 98 3200 ANTHONY L. NICOLI 213151 451-66 C 0 M CON 7 7 07 07 98 98 3400 3500 BRADLEY JOSEPH E. J. NIELSEN PAZANDAK 213152 213153 904 41 1116-25 CON 7 07 98 3580 CHRISTOPHER J. POUNDER 213154 870-02 CON 7 07 98 3600 DANIEL j. RANDALL 213155 872.30 CON 7 07 98 3650 BRIAN C. RIENSTRA 213156 135-76 CON 7 07 98 3701 BRIAN M. ROERICK 213157 110.00 CON 7 07 98 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 213158 1150.15 CON 7 07 98 3815 MICHAEL J. RUFFENACH 213159 366-60 Cori 7 07 98 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 213160 461-86 CON 7 07 93 3910 R CONRAD SCHMID 213161 32-32 CON 7 07 98 4050 BERNARD J. SCHNURR 213162 113-76 CON 7 07 98 4175 ANDREW R. SMITH 213163 80-80 CON 7 07 98 4200 BRENDA L. LUKE 213164 71-47 C 0 ill't 7 07 98 4250 JON T. SPICER 213165 65-53 CON V 07 93 4525 DANIEL D. STRAND 213166 136-59 C C M 7 07 98 4575 REBECCA A. TARVIN 213167 148.08 COMPUTER CHECKS 22884.72 MANUAL CHECKS NOTICES OF DEPOSIT ****TOTALS**W;ic 22884-12 Page 9 0