Loading...
062298 CC Reg AgPI CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1998 7:00 P.M. -' Immediately following the regular portion of the meeting, the Council will convene in Work Session format. No action will be taken at this time. AGENDA 1 . CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg Stover O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda Champa 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 26, 1998 (Att. -#2A Minutes) B . City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 8, 1998 (Att. -#2B Minutes) C. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes June 8, 1998 (Att. -#2C Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: NOTE: Give the public an opportunity to request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Comments can be taken or questions asked on an item when it is considered following its removal from the Consent Agenda. A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a 1998 Tree Trimmer's License (Att. - #3A Proposed Resolution) B . A Motion to Approve a Block Party Request - July 18, 1998 at 4:00 p.m. (Att. -#3B Application) C . A Motion to Approve the Permanent Appointment of Twila Grout as Parks/Public Works Secretary 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A. Report on June 9, 1998 Park Commission Meeting (Att.45A Draft Minutes) B . Consideration of a Motion Accepting a Revised 1998 -2002 Park Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (Att. -#5B Proposed CIP) N . - COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 22, 1998 • PAGE 2 OF 2 C. Consideration of a Request to Contribute Funds to New Playground Equipment at Minnewashta School (Att. -#5C Letter of Request) 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRIBUTION TO EXCELSIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS CELEBRATION (Att.47 Letter of Request) 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE INFLOW AND INFILTRATION REPORT PREPARED BY WSB (Att.48 Engineer's Memorandum, Report & Proposed Resolution) 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1998 SEAL COATING PROJECT (Att.49 Engineer's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution) 10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 98- 03— BITUMINOUS OVERLAY (Att. -#10 Engineer's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution) 11. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS A. Staff Report on Development Monitoring B . Report on Shoreline Messages (Att. -#11B Summary) C. Report on Storm Clean-up D. Establishment of July Work Session Dates (Att. -#1 ID Schedule) 12. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS 13. ADJOURN TO WORK SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att. - #13) ciry OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall@shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Meeting Monday, June 22,1998 The Council will meet in work session format following the close of the regular Council meeting. Agenda Item #3A: This resolution approves a tree trimming license for Shorewood Tree Residential Service which is now a separate entity from Shorewood Tree Service. The existing P, Shorewood Tree Service already has a license to do business in Shorewood. Agenda Item #3B: This would be a motion to approve a block party request to block off the cul de sac area on Noble Road (west end) for a neighborhood party beginning at 4:00 p.m. on the 18th of July. The barricade should be removed by sunset. Agenda Item #3C: This motion approves the permanent appointment of Twila Grout at the end of her six month probationary period. The City Administrator strongly recommends the T Council approves this motion. She has had a very positive six month evaluation from the Administrative Secretary and Public Works Director. Agenda Item #5A: Chair Dan Puzak has indicated he will be present to report on the June 9 Park Commission meeting. Agenda Item #5B: The Park Commission has been reviewing the Five Year Capital Improvement Program and is recommending a revised document for the Council to consider adopting. It is enclosed in the packet for your consideration. Along with a copy of the original CIP which had been adopted last year. Agenda Item #5C: The Park Commission is recommending that the City contribute $3,000 and some assistance from the Public Works Department to help with the installation of $60,000 worth of playground equipment at Minnewashta School. The Commission had been first approached several months ago from the parent teacher organization for a contribution. Several members of the organization plan to be in attendance to explain the request to the Council. The Commission's recommendation was on a 5/2 vote. Agenda Item #7: This would be a motion authorizing the contribution of $1,000 which has been budgeted to go to the Excelsior 4th of July fireworks celebration. .s :t « � PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Agenda Item #8: This item is a resolution which accepts the inflow and infiltration (M) study prepared by WSB and Associates. This report is a requirement of the grant received from the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services. It is estimated that M costs the City of Shorewood approximately $101,000 annually. This plan proposes approximately $87,000 worth of work to reduce M. Over the long term, the City will save money by reducing I/I. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. Agenda Item #9: This resolution accepts bids and awards the contract for sealcoating to Allied Blacktop. The bid received is below the engineer's estimate and the adopted budget. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the resolution. Agenda Item #10: This resolution authorizes advertisement for bid for bituminous overlays. Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. • • 4 i CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MAY 26, 1998 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. A . Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa; Administrator Jim Hurm; City Attorney Ron Batty; Engineer Larry Brown; Planning Director Brad Nielsen Absent: B. Review Agenda Mayor Dahlberg read the Agenda for May 26, 1998. Councilmember O'Neill suggested revising the Agenda, moving Item 6A to 13A. Mayor Dahlberg noted Item No. 7 will be stricken from the Agenda since that matter has been resolved. Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded accepting the agenda as amended. Motion passed 510. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Minutes - May 4, 1998 Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Work Session Minutes for May 4, 1998, as amended on Page 5, Item LU3, Sentence 1, change "he" to "Councilmember O'Neill "; Sentence 3, delete "the preservation of." Motion passed 4/0. (Councilmember Stover abstained.) B . City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - May 11, 1998 Dahlberg moved, _Stover seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for May 11, 1998, as amended on Page 8, Paragraph 8, Sentence 2, change "he" to "staff." Motion passed 4/0. (Councilmember Champa abstained.) C . City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes - May 11, 1998 Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes for May 11, 1998 as submitted. Motion passed 4/0. (Councilmember Champa abstained.) 3. CONSENT AGENDA Stover moved, O'Neill seconded approving the Motions contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions therein: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 2 A. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -049 "A Resolution Approving Intoxicating Liquor License On -Sale, Intoxicating Liquor & Special Sunday Sales - Minnetonka Country Club B . A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -050 "A Resolution Approving a Temporary Gambling License for Store Front Youth Action C. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -051 "A Resolution Establishing a Polling Place - Precinct III" D. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -052 "A Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Non - Disclosure Agreement with Hennepin County" E. A Motion Adopting an Amendment to Ordinance No. 319 Extending the Moratorium on the Siting of Adult Establishments Motion passed 510. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None Christine Lizee, 27055 Smithtown Road, expressed her appreciation to Engineer Brown and the Public Works Department for their storm clean up efforts after the May 15th storm. 5. PARKS - Report by Representative A . Report on May 12, 1998 Park Commission Meeting Administrator Hurm reported on the park tours currently being conducted by the Commission. 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative Planning Director Nielsen reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the May 5, 1998 meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Making an Appointment to the Planning Commission Vice Chair Position (This Item was considered as Agenda Item No. 13A) B . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Combination /Subdivision Applicant: Ron Hume Location: 25040 Yellowstone Trail Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -053 "A Resolution Approving a Combination/Subdivision for Ron Hume, 25040 Yellowstone Trail." Motion passed 510. C . A Motion Establishing A Public Hearing Date of June 8, 1998, to Consider Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements for Ron Hume CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 3 Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded establishing a Public Hearing date of June 8, 1998, to Consider Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements for Ron Hume. Motion passed 510. D . A Motion to Consider a Request for a Simple Subdivision Applicant: Dean Johnson Location: 5875 Cathcart Drive Mr. Johnson was in attendance and stated he would like to maximize the depth of the lot. The lot was registered as a Torrens lot in the mid '70s with 147 feet of depth east and west along Smithtown. The width, north and south along Cathcart, is approximately 338 feet. Mr. Johnson stated he would like the southern boundary with 23 feet of dedication to the City for Cathcart Drive. He explained if there is a 25 -foot dedication, the side yard will be very narrow. In addition, there is no existing pavement on Mr. Johnson's side of the roadway. Councilmember O'Neill expressed concern relative to the house being designed to the lot as well as the six feet of pavement which leaves the City with less right -of -way. Councilmember O'Neill questioned the right -of -way on the other side of the roadway. Brown explained this would have to be field verified by survey. Nielsen stated the City has 33 feet on the other side of the roadway. Nielsen stated his recommendation for 27 feet of right -of -way was based on the idea of combining this with the 30 feet on the other side of the road resulting in a 60 -foot right -of -way, which is the minimum width for collector streets. Councilmember O'Neill expressed concern with creating a right -of -way which consists of an odd number of feet. Mayor Dahlberg noted there is some flexibility given the 33 feet which exist on the other side of the roadway. Mr. Johnson stated with the house setback and the 50 -foot setback requirement, he would like the western property line as far to the west as possible. Mr. Johnson pointed out if there is a 50 -foot setback from the lot line, 25 feet of easement and six feet of pavement, the house will be set back 69 feet from the pavement. This forces the rear of the proposed home closer to Mr. Johnson's home. Brown felt the Planning Commission made a sound recommendation which provides for the future. If the roadway were to be reconstructed, there may be an attempt to center the roadway on the appropriate roadway center line. Brown felt there to be good precedent for the 25 feet even though it will create a right -of -way which consists of an odd number of feet. Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the Planning Commission's recommendation for a 25 -foot right -of -way as well as the request for a Simple Subdivision for Dean Johnson, 5875 Cathcart Drive. Councilmember O'Neill suggested approving a 23 -foot right -of -way which would make the lot more buildable. Mayor Dahlberg stated he would be able to support that suggestion. Councilmember Champa was in agreement. He stated the goal is to keep the homes in the City spaced apart and this would allow for that. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 4 Councilmember Stover felt there to be logic in utilizing a 25 -foot right -of -way and pointed out there is more being taken from one neighbor than another. Councilmember O'Neill noted that although this is a collector street, it will not be larger than a standard city street. Brown explained if the roadway would have to be reconstructed in the future and it were to be moved, the City may be required to purchase a roadway easement, however, he pointed out he does not see any vertical profile concerns. Motion failed 1/4. (Mayor Dahlberg and Councilmembers O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa were the dissenting votes.) Champa moved, Garfunkel seconded approving a 23 -foot right -of -way as well as the request for a Simple Subdivision for Dean Johnson, 5875 Cathcart Drive. Motion passed 4/1. (Councilmember Stover was the dissenting vote.) E. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution to Approve a Final Plat - Mary Lake Woods Applicant: Jim Wyman Location: 24020 Yellowstone Trail Stover moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -054 "A Resolution Approving a Final Plat - Mary Lake Woods for Jim Wyman, 24020 Yellowstone Trail." Motion passed 510. 7. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ABATE CITY CLEAN -UP CHARGE This Item was stricken from the Agenda. 8. PARKS - Report by Representative A . Report on May 12, 1998 Park Commission Meeting Commissioner Themig arrived and reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the May 12, 1998 meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). 0 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR STORM CLEAN -UP Administrator Hurm noted he does not have costs or cost estimates available at this time. He requested the Council recognize there will be major expenditures associated with the storm clean up which will be paid out of the General Fund Reserve. Brown commented staff will report back to the Council when exact amounts are known. Stover moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -055 "A Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds from the General Fund Budget for Storm Clean -Up." Motion passed 510. 10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING SUMP PUMP INSPECTION CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 5 Councilmember Garfunkel felt the City Inspector should complete a sump pump inspection on Mr. Johnson's property. He did not feel this should be handled any differently than any other resident. Councilmember Garfunkel stated he does not feel qualified to complete such an inspection and felt Councilmember O'Neill may be the only qualified member on the Council to do an inspection. Mayor Dahlberg noted there are instances where a resident prefers to work with an elected official rather than an employee of the City. Dahlberg moved allowing Mayor Dahlberg to perform an inspection of Mr. Johnson's sump pump. Motion failed for Iack of a second. Councilmember O'Neill felt someone who is an expert in this field should perform the inspection. Councilmember Stover inquired whether this is the last inspection which needs to be completed in the City. Brown stated there may be one more inspection outstanding. Councilmember Stover felt there to be certain areas in which a councilmember is not necessarily qualified to perform such an inspection. Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded allowing Councilmember O'Neill to perform an inspection of Mr. Johnson's sump pump. Councilmember Stover felt a professional plumbing contractor should be utilized to complete this inspection. Mayor Dahlberg withdrew his motion. Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded directing Engineer Brown to contact Mr. Johnson in an attempt to make arrangements for an independent plumbing contractor to complete the inspection at Mr. Johnson's expense. Motion passed 5/0. 11. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID - 1998 JOINT SEALCOATING PROJECT Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded authorizing advertisement for bid -1998 Joint Sealcoating Project. Motion passed 510. 12. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TELEVISING OF SANITARY SEWER O'Neill moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -056 "A Resolution Authorizing Award of Contract for Televising of Sanitary Sewer." Councilmember O'Neill questioned whether staff has considered the City undertaking this project itself. Brown explained he did consider this, however, there would be significant expense involved. Vote on Motion: Motion passed 510. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 6 13. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SECTION 201 - PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commissioner Christine Lizee was in attendance and requested clarification from Councilmember O'Neill relative to his belief the Commission should be reduced from seven to five members. Councilmember O'Neill explained he has received a number of complaints relative to the length of time the Planning Commission dedicates to a particular issue. He noted this does not apply to work session meetings, but to public hearing type meetings. He noted the complaints have been received from present members of the Commission, applicants to the Commission and various citizens. Commissioner Lizee questioned whether Councilmember O'Neill had brought this issue to the attention of the Planning Commission in his capacity as Council Liaison to the Commission. Councilmember O'Neill noted it was discussed at the last Commission meeting and none of the members were opposed to this idea. Commissioner Lizee did not feel there to be a timing issue and commented it is a part of the responsibility the Planning Commission has to the City and to the residents for fair and equitable decision making. She pointed out the Commission does a fair amount of research and work for the Council in order to make an appropriate recommendation. Mayor Dahlberg asked what the argument would be for keeping a seven member Commission. Commissioner Lizee felt a seven member Commission would provide better representation throughout the community. She did not feel the size of the Commission dictates the length of time in which a matter is addressed. Commissioner Lizee explained if the Commission is comprised of experienced members who have looked into the background of an issue, they are able to discuss matters in varying lengths of time. Councilmember Stover pointed out many of the present councilmembers campaigned on the fact they would like a substantial amount of citizen representation and input. She felt reducing the size of the Commission to be counterproductive. Councilmember Stover could not understand why the Council would want to reduce the size of the Commission since the members volunteer their services to the City. Mayor Dahlberg stated he does not feel strongly on this issue, however, he felt the odds of • inefficiency to be reduced on any given committee when the size is reduced. Mayor Dahlberg stated it is not necessarily the case that there would be more citizen involvement, but less accountability which goes directly to the voters. Councilmember Stover pointed out the Planning Commission can only make recommendations to the Council. Mayor Dahlberg felt the Planning Commission to be very powerful in bringing forth issues. He stated he is sympathetic to the issue of representativeness. Councilmember Garfunkel noted the City does not utilize a ward system and he did not feel the various commissioners would necessarily bring very different perspectives to a matter. He also felt the Planning Commission to be a very technical position without a lot of room for interpretation. He felt it to be more important to have knowledgeable, competent people on the Commission versus representation. Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether Commissioner Lizee would support a ward system and she felt she would, however, she would not be in favor of reducing the seven member Commission. Councilmember Garfunkel noted the applications which have been received in the last couple of CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 7 years have not been representative of the City. Councilmember Champa expressed mixed feelings relative to this issue, noting during his term on the Commission, there were often meetings with only five or six commissioners in attendance. He noted there would often be a considerable amount of discussion on a particular item which would come full circle and which would ultimately be unproductive. Councilmember Champa expressed his belief this can be the result of the make up of the Commission. He felt the Commission could be streamlined if the members were reduced from seven to five. O'Neill moved, Champa seconded adopting ORDINANCE NO. , "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 201 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances to become effective June 12, 1998." Councilmember Garfunkel commented if representation is not an issue, the reference to appointing a member from the islands would be unnecessary. He felt it would be more appropriate to indicate the Council will endeavor to appoint a commission member across various geographic areas of the City. Councilmember Stover questioned the use of the June date. Councilmember O'Neill pointed out the Council is up for election and he felt the Commission to be a legacy which is left by the Council. Garfunkel moved, Champa seconded amending the motion to remove the reference to "It shall be the policy of the City to endeavor to appoint one of the Commission members who is a resident of Enchanted Island or Shady Island." Motion failed, 4/2. (Mayor Dahlberg and Councilmember Stover were the dissenting votes.) Councilmember Stover was opposed to the speed with which this has been done. She felt if the Council feels this reduction in the Commission is in the best interests of the City, it should be accomplished on January 1, 1999, when appointment would normally be made. Vote on Motion: Motion passed 4/1. (Councilmember Stover was the dissenting vote.) A . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Making an Appointment to the Planning Commission Vice Chair Position O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded tabling consideration of an Appointment to the Planning Commission Vice Chair Position until after the June 1, 1998, work session in which the Council will discuss the make up of the Planning Commission. Motion passed 4/1. (Councilmember Stover was the dissenting vote.) 14. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE AD HOC LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -057 "A Resolution Making An Appointment of Frederick Bruno to the Ad Hoc Land Conservation Committee upon his acceptance of this appointment." Motion passed 510. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 8 Laura Turgeon, expressed her disappointment in the action taken by the Council relative to the Planning Commission. She pointed out when new commissioners are appointed, the process becomes more time consuming when it is necessary to explain why the Commission does or does not do a particular thing. Ms. Turgeon stated the speed with which the Council handled this issue leads her to believe there is a hidden motive to do something else. She pointed out during her term on the Planning Commission, Councilmember O'Neill never raised any concerns to the Commission in his capacity as Council Liaison. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out Councilmember O'Neill did raise this issue on a number of occasions with individual councilmembers as well as during work sessions. Ms. Turgeon felt it would have been appropriate for the Council to hold a joint session with the Planning Commission to discuss this situation. Councilmember O'Neill stated he would disagree that the new members are the ones responsible for slowing the meeting down. Ms. Turgeon stated the Council needs to take some responsibility and provide some direction to the Planning Commission rather than reducing the size of the Commission. Ms. Turgeon also questioned why the Park Commission is not being reduced in size and Mayor Dahlberg pointed out he had recommended this be done. Councilmember Garfunkel commented that discussion has not been completed at this time. Mayor Dahlberg stated there is no hidden agenda. The reduction in the Planning Commission is an example of governmental streamlining. 15. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS A . Staff Report on Development Monitoring Nielsen reported on Watten Ponds. A letter was sent to the developer directing that a number of items be corrected. On a drive through of the site today, Nielsen found that most of the items had been corrected. The stockpile of dirt has been reduced and the tree protection fencing appears to be in good shape. Dirt has been removed from the erosion control fencing as well. In some areas, vegetation has been establish to the point the erosion control fencing may not be necessary, however, the developer has been directed to leave the fencing in place to assure there are no erosion problems. The wear course of bituminous on the street has been completed. Nielsen would expect to see a request for a reduction in the Letter of Credit in the near future. The retaining wall along the west side of the road remains to be removed. Tree reforestation will also need to be completed by June 15th and a reminder letter will be sent in this regard. The restoration of the north end of the wetland along Eureka Road remains to be completed. The Watershed District has been asked to address this issue, however, the City will now take it upon itself to have the elevation determined with City surveyors. If there is a discrepancy between the approved plan and the elevation which exists today, this will be reported to the Watershed District. With respect to Smithtown Meadows, the landscape plan remains to be completed. A letter will be sent to the developer instructing the trees must be planted by June 30th. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 9 Nielsen stated there are no problems to report with respect to the Marsh Pointe development. There are several homes currently under construction. B . Report on Shoreline Messages Received Hurm reported the messages received in the last week are generally concerning storm damage. Several flyers have been sent out to clarify the Council's position relative to storm damage clean up. C . Report on Telecommunications Consultant Process Mayor Dahlberg reported the Council is in the process of hiring a telecommunication consultant to assist in addressing the federal law requirements with respect to cellular towers. D . Administrator's Report and CIarification of Tonka United Soccer Policy Hurm reported Tonka United Soccer has a specific assigned area in which to play at Freeman Park. 16 They are not to have fields in the areas down by the playground equipment and where the trailer used to be last year to the right field of Field 6 or to the right field of Field 4. There could be hard hit fly balls and/or foul balls in this area. Hurm also reported last year Tonka United Soccer did play in these areas since Cathcart Park and Minnewashta School areas were not ready. He noted there was some miscommunication because some games were scheduled at one location this year as well, however, those have been rescheduled. With respect to the football field area, there are no games to be played there. The field has fairly new sod and it needs to rest and there are no games, therefore, scheduled for the football field. Mayor Dahlberg requested staff keep in contact with Mr. Schroeder relative to this matter. 16. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Report on Emergency Meeting of May 18, 1998 - Storm Issues Mayor Dahlberg reported on the Emergency Meeting of May 18, 1998, (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). Hurm reviewed the storm clean up policy which was established. Report on Work Session of May 18, 1998 Land Use Issues Hurm noted the Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan has been completed. Nielsen stated the Council will move on to the Natural Resources, Community Facilities and Transportation chapters. Assessing Issues Hurm reported the Council has indicated a desire to request proposals for assessing services and this will be done this year. Councilmember O'Neill thanked the Public Works Department for their work during the storm clean up. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 26, 1998 - PAGE 10 17. ADJOURNMENT O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded adjourning the regular meeting at approximately 9:.00 p.m. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1998 MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. He announced the Council will convene in Executive Session immediately following the regular portion of the meeting to discuss the status of litigation. A . Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg, Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa; Administrator Jim Hurm; City Attorney John Dean; Engineer Larry Brown; Planning Director Brad Nielsen • B . Review Agenda Mayor Dahlberg read the Agenda for June 8, 1998. The agenda was approved as submitted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Emergency Session Meeting Minutes - May 18, 1998 Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Emergency Session Meeting Minutes for May 18, 1998, as amended on Page 1, Item No. 2, Sentence 1, change to read, "three members of the Council." Motion passed 510. B . City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes - May 18, 1998 Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes for May 18, 1998, as amended on Page 1, Item No. 2, Paragraph 4, Sentence 1, add "because we don't know whether or not this i s • true." Motion passed 4/0. ( Councilmember Stover abstained.) C . City Council Emergency Session Meeting Minutes - May 19, 1998 O'Neill moved, Champa seconded approving the City Council Emergency Session Meeting Minutes for May 19, 1998 as submitted. Motion passed 3/0. (Councilmembers Stover and Garfunkel abstained.) 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Tom Kelsey, 25605 Smithtown Road, felt there to be a considerable amount of concern relative to some comments which he had directed at Mayor Dahlberg and stated he takes credit for the article which appeared in the Saturday edition of the Star Tribune. Mr. Kelsey stated he takes credit for the article as a matter of personal integrity and honesty. He stated he is deeply opposed to the administration of the City's public affairs. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 2 Mr. Kelsey commented in the past he has written many articles to the Sun Sailor to voice his concerns. He related his belief Mayor Dahlberg and the Preservation Team ignore anyone who gets in their way. Mr. Kelsey stated he is committed to doing all he can to bring the activities and conduct of the Preservation Team to the attention of the public and stated he will use any means to publicize what occurs in the City. Mayor Dahlberg commented he will allow the people of Shorewood to decide what needs additional explanation, if anything, and whether the City is proceeding in the direction they wish. Ingrid Schaff, 25606 Smithtown Road, also commented on the Star Tribune article. She expressed her belief Mayor Dahlberg does not have the right, as a public official, to make comments which are distasteful, unprofessional and demeaning because residents of the community criticize him for a lack of process. Ms. Schaff felt Mayor Dahlberg owes the residents of Shorewood an apology for a statement which was made to a Star Tribune reporter. Ms. Schaff pointed out the City recently spent $12,000 of taxpayer funds to determine whether there is an interest in a trail system. She stated the survey reveals the interest is overwhelming. Ms. Schaff commented Mayor Dahlberg conducted a survey with the purpose of refuting the results of the survey. • Mayor Dahlberg commented the various commissions no longer run the City. This is the responsibility of the Council. With respect to the survey results, Mayor Dahlberg stated they will be disclosed in several weeks. He felt the survey, although a good device, failed to ask the key question, whether people would accept a trail in their own neighborhood. Mayor Dahlberg suggested addressing Item Nos. 5 and 7 given the fact the public hearing could not be heard until 7:15 p.m. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO REBATE PARK DEDICATION AND SANITARY SEWER CHARGES FOR RON HUME Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -056 "A Resolution Rebating Park Dedication and Sanitary Sewer Charges for Ron Hume." Motion passed 510. 5. PARKS - Report by Representative • A . Report on May 27, 1998 Park Commission Meeting Commissioner Cochran reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the May 27, 1998 meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). 6. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR RON HUME Mayor Dahlberg opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. Planning Director Nielsen provided a review of the request of Mr. Hume. Hearing no public testimony, Mayor Dahlberg closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Stover moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -057 "A Resolution Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements for Ron Hume." Motion passed 510. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 3 Mayor Dahlberg suggested addressing Item No. 8 given the fact the public hearing is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. 7. PLANNING - Report by Representative Planning Director Nielsen reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the June 2, 1998 meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Simple Subdivision Applicant: Dean Johnson Location: 5875 Cathcart Drive Stover moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -058 "A Resolution Approving a Simple Subdivision for Dean Johnson, 5875 Cathcart Drive." Motion passed 510. Mr. Johnson complimented staff, the Planning Commission and Council. He related when working with the. City years ago, he experienced allegism, with the exception of Councilmember Stover, and he felt, with respect to his current request, that everyone considered the facts. Mr. Johnson expressed his belief there has been a vast improvement in the City. 8. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF WILD ROSE LANE RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR DAVE PECK Planning Director Nielsen reviewed the request of Mr. Peck. Mayor Dahlberg opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Hearing no public testimony, he closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. O'Neill moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -059 "A Resolution Vacating a Portion of Wild Rose Lane Right -of -Way For Dave Peck." Motion passed 510. 9. PLANNING - Continued 0 B . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Combination /Subdivision Applicant: John Cross on behalf of Minnetonka Moorings Location: 600 West Lake Street Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -060 "A Resolution Approving a Combination/Subdivision for John Cross on behalf of Minnetonka Moorings, 600 West Lake Street." Motion passed 510. C . A Motion to Adopt A Resolution Approving a Subdivision /Combination Applicant: Virginia Svoboda and Joseph Glaccum Location: 6090 and 6130 Chaska Road Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -061 "A Resolution Approving a Subdivision /Combination for Virginia Svoboda and Joseph Glaccum, 6090 and 6130 Chaska Road." Motion passed 510. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 4 10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 95 -17 - STRAWBERRY LANE Engineer Brown explained Hardrives is the responsible low bidder at $194,554. Since the engineer's estimate was $220,000, it is recommended that the bid be accepted and the contract awarded to Hardrives, Inc. Stover moved, Champa seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -062 "A Resolution Accepting the Bids and Awarding Contract for Project No. 95 -17 - Strawberry Lane to Hardrives." Motion passed 510. 11. CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS REGARDING PROJECT NO. 97 -03 - LAKESIDE WATERMAIN EXTENSION A . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Enter into an Agreement with the Petitioners for Lakeside Watermain Mayor Dahlberg expressed concern whether or not there should be a waiver obtained relative to the fact water quality may not improve with this watermain extension. Brown stated this waiver was presented to the petitioners at the beginning of the process. Brown has had conversations with the petitioners relative to the water quality and iron content versus the water quality the petitioners are currently receiving. Champa moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -063 "A Resolution Authorizing the Form of Agreement with the Petitioners for Lakeside Watermain." Motion passed 510. B . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Project No. 97 -03 - Lakeside Watermain Extension Contingent upon Agreement - Item 10A Mayor Dahlberg expressed concern the low bid is significantly lower than the other bids which were received. Brown noted staff was also concerned with this bid and did check references. He found this company performs work for cities directly. The cities contacted provided very good references noting the jobs were completed on time and within costs. Councilmember O'Neill suggested at some point the Council discuss the possibility of having the citizens build a particular project which the City would take over once it is completed. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out this construction company is contracting with the City. The City then assesses the residents for the cost of the project. In the event there are difficulties between the City and the contractor, the City ultimately pays for resolving those disagreements. Mayor Dahlberg also felt the Council should discuss Councilmember O'Neill's suggestion further at a future work session. He commented, however, this may be one of the inherent risks which municipal government must take on. Councilmember Stover was in agreement with Mayor Dahlberg's comments. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 5 Attorney Dean pointed out Councilmember O'Neill's suggestion is a common way in which many cities address new subdivisions. Many of the public improvements in these areas are constructed by the subdivider or the developer and it is then turned over to the City. In those instances, the subdivider or the developer is paying the entire cost up front of constructing the improvements. The mechanism which the Council has chosen to use in this case is one that not only determines who constructs, but it is the financing arrangement which is most compelling to the residents. Champa moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -064 "A Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Project No. 97 -03 - Lakeside Watermain Extension Contingent upon Agreement." Motion passed 510. 12. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - WILTSEY LANE Brown reported staff recommends scenario No. 3 in which a portion of the costs would be assessed against the benefiting property owners. Mayor Dahlberg questioned whether all of the residents have been contacted and whether they are in favor of this project. Brown explained it O would be the purpose of the public information meeting to gain the input of the affected property owners. Councilmember O'Neill inquired whether the City would be responsible for the cost of a blacktop road. Brown noted the City would not be responsible for this cost. Councilmember Garfunkel noted this to be an existing road and did not feel the City should be taking the responsibility for any cost associated with this improvement. Councilmember O'Neill feels at this point, the Council needs to discuss this matter with the concerned residents. Mayor Dahlberg noted his agreement. Councilmember Stover felt this to be similar to a road reclamation project in that when repairing or improving a road, both the property owners and the City are going to spend some money to achieve this. Councilmember O'Neill pointed out the City had not scheduled this particular roadway for improvement at this time. • Brown recommended June 24, 1998, 6:30 to 7:30 p.m., for the public information meeting. Stover moved, O'Neill seconded Setting a Date for a Public Information Meeting - Wiltsey Lane for June 24, 1998, from 6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Motion passed 510. Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded tabling acceptance of the Feasibility Report for Wiltsey Lane until July 13, 1998. Motion passed 510. 13. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL OF SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS, INC. Councilmember Champa noted the job hazard analyses are not included and suggested Brown include these. He inquired how the annual certification and updates will be addressed. Brown explained he will find out exactly what the program entails and then determine what will be required to update the program on an annual basis. Councilmember Champa also suggested addressing new employee training. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 6 Brown explained with respect to the funding aspects, it is recommended $1,332.60 be taken from the Contingency Fund. Mayor Dahlberg expressed concern relative to utilizing funds from the Travel, Conference and Schools Fund to cover the cost of this project. Brown explained at this point in time, considering the storm damage and the projects currently underway, these funds would probably not be utilized. Champa moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -065 "A Resolution Accepting the Proposal of Safe Assure Consultants, Inc., subject to including job hazard analyses, annual certification and updates as well as new employee training." Motion passed 510. 14. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY WATERFORD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO LEASE OR PURCHASE AN OUTLOT FOR LOCATION OF AN ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN The president of the homeowners association has requested this item be tabled while consideration is given to whether the association will lease or purchase this property. Nielsen felt the association is leaning toward leasing the land versus purchasing it. This would also be the recommendation of staff. He will investigate the issue of a reasonable rate of lease for this piece of property. • Stover moved, Champa seconded, setting a public hearing date of July 13, 1998 for a public hearing relative to the request by Waterford Homeowners Association to lease or purchase an outlot for location of an entry monument sign. Motion passed 510. 15. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Councilmember O'Neill explained Deborah Borkon has endorsed the appointments under certain circumstances with representation being her main concern. O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98 -066 "A Resolution Making Appointments of Deborah Borkon, Jeff Bailey, Paula Callies, Pat Collins and Neil Anderson to the Planning Commission." Motion passed 4/1. (Councilmember Stover was the dissenting vote.) • Councilmember Stover stated she is opposed to the idea of having a five member Planning Commission. 16. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS A . Staff Report on Development Monitoring Nielsen reported most developments are essentially completed. With respect to Watten Ponds, two homes are under construction. There are tree protection fences which are down given the storm damage which occurred within the City. June 30th has been selected as the deadline for reforestation on the Watten Ponds project and an extension of this deadline has not been requested. Brown reported on Glen Road stating the County is willing to sign off on the installation of a pipe from the sedimentation basin down the ditch line of County Road 19 to outlet by the trail as long as the City is willing to maintain the pipe. Brown explained this would be consistent with the normal practices of any development in which the City would maintain the storm sewer and he will communicate to the County that the City will take responsibility for maintaining the pipe. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 7 B . Report on Shoreline Messages Received C . Report on Storm Damage Brown provided and explained an update of the estimated costs to date for storm damage cleanup. He estimated a total cost of cleanup will be $44,000 to $45,000. Brown explained the drop off site at Freeman Park will be closed for a period of time while the grinding process is in progress. Contractors may grind material from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., giving them the maximum period of time to complete this work. It was agreed the following postcard will be sent to all residents: Storm Clean Up Final Dates: The Shorewood City Council has established final dates for storm damage brush and branch cleanup work. • All brush and limbs must be placed roadside by Monday, June 15, 1998 at 7:00 a.m. Final rounds by City equipment will begin at that time and travel only once along each street. It will take a number of days to cover the entire city, but all brush piles must be roadside by the 15th. The designated drop off sites for brush and limbs (Freeman Park, Shady Island common area and Dellwood Lane cul -de -sac) will remain open for resident use until Tuesday, June 30, 1998. Additional material will not be accepted after that date. Again this is for storm damaged branches only. They must be under 6 inches in diameter and less than 8 feet in length. Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded utilizing June 15 and June 30, 1998 as dates to be included in the post card. Motion passed 510. D . Report on 1999 Draft LMCD Budget Bob Rascop, Shorewood's representative to the LMCD, was in attendance to discuss the proposed • budget with the Council. The proposed budget reflects a decrease of $3,125 in Shorewood's obligation. 17. MAYOR & -CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Report on Work Session Meeting of June 1, 1998 Mayor Dahlberg reported on the City Council Work Session Meeting of June 1, 1998, (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). Mayor commented on the clean up and noted the progress is evident. He expressed appreciation to Commissioner Penny Steele and Hennepin County for their assistance in this matter. Councilmember O'Neill complimented Public Works on their work in this regard. Hurm explained a member of the Greenwood City Council has expressed an interest in using the Freeman Park drop off site. He noted there is a problem with this in that the City does not allow contractors to utilize this site. Hurm suggested, however, utilizing the former rest stop lot north of Highway 7. The City of Greenwood would be responsible for disposal of their own items. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 8, 1998 - PAGE 8 18. ADJOURNMENT Garfunkel moved, Stover seconded adjourning the regular meeting to Executive Session at 8:53 p.m. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 510. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1998 FOLLOWING REGULAR PORTION OF MEETING MI NUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 9:04 p.m. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill, Garfunkel and Champa; City Attorney John Dean; City Planner Brad Nielsen; City Engineer Larry Brown; and Administrator Jim Hurm 2. DISCUSSION ON STATUS OF CURRENT AND PENDING LITIGATION MATTERS • Attorney Dean briefed the Council on the status of pending and current litigation matters. 3. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Dahlberg adjourned the City Council Executive Session Meeting at 9:48 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED James C. Hurm, City Administrator ATTEST s TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES U. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR #ac I CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98— • • WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code Section 305 provides for the annual licensing of tree trimmers in the City; and WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant submit a letter of intent and fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicants have satisfactorily completed this process and have submitted the requirements for the issuance of a License for Tree Trimmers. as follows: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood That a License for Tree Trimming be issued for a term from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, to the following applicant: A RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSES FOR TREE TRIMMERS Permit # Firm Name Address 98 -031 Shorewood Residential Tree Service 9715 Fenner Ave. SE Delano, NIN 55328 IRM ATTEST ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 22nd day of June, TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 0 June 9, 1998 TO: City of Shorewood FROM: Shorewood Tree Residential Service RE: License application ATTN: Connie, Deputy Clerk We would like to renew -apply our tree trimmers license for the year of 1998. Our Certificates of Insurance, effective 6 -1 -98 to 6 -1 -99 has been sent directly from our insurance agent. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, -z Linda Schwerin Partner /Office Manager Shorewood Tree Residential Service 9715 Fenner Ave SE Delano, MN 55328 #612- 972 -2441 office • #612 - 474 -6651 office #612- 972 -6349 home ® CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 Received of n�r�a �v OFFICIAL RECEIPT N 28773 Date _ LL — l Q 199& DOLLARS $ •• - - w rerson making Payment CANARY - To Finance PINK - Retained by Clerk DUE TO OUR RAPID GROWTH SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Has changed to: SHOREWOOD TREE RESIDENTIAL SERVICE Mailing address: 9715 Fenner Ave SE Delano, Mn 55328 Phone #'s: 612- 474 -6651 or 612- 972 -2441 Federal Tax ID#: 41- 1907885 (Shop still in Shorewood) • Specializing in Residential Trimming & Removals SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Mailing Address: 14015 County Road #122 Watertown, MN 55388 Phone #: 612- 955 -3018 Federal Tax ID#: 41- 1870825 Specializing in Commercial Contracts, Land Clearings & Hauling This letter is to inform you of the change, effective June 1, 1998, and to apply S for your City license for Shorewood Tree Residential Service (with new Federal ID #). Our check is enclosed for the license. Certificates of insurance will be sent directly from our Insurance Company. Please put our Residential company on your City contact list for your residents. Please be assured that you and your residents will still receive the same high quality service Shorewood Tree has always given. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 474 -6651 or 972 -2441. Thank You, Everyone at Shorewood Tree A001;10. PRODUCER Grant Bullis Agency 1000 Superior Blvd. #208 Wayzata, MN 55391 (612) 449 -0089 _ ... .............. INSURED ............................... Dale & Linda Schwerin DBA: Shorewood Tree Residential Sry 9715 Fenner Avenue SE Delano, MN 55328 THIS .: IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE .POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/DDNY) DATE (MM/DDNY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X _ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Pending 9 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ ' ....' ' - . .. ' 50 , CLAIMS MADE X ;OCCUR. - PRODUCTS•COMPIOP AGG. $ :._ -- _..... _..... -:- 500,000 _. . OWNER'S 6 CONTRACTOR'S PROT. 0 6 /01 /9 8 06101101 :.. PERSONAL a ADV INJURY $ ......... ............. ........:......... .................. 5 0 0 009 ............. EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5 0 0 ,00 0 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ ._.. ........ __. 50,000 _ - - ! .._.._..._. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ....... �....__ .__. MED. EXPENSE (Any one person) :$ .. .......... 5 ' A X ANY AUTO Pending ` SINGLE $ 5 0 0 ,00 0 ALL OWNED AUTOS .0 6 /0 1/9 8 0 61 0 11 01. BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ X HIRED AUTOS _ X - NON -OWNED AUTOS ; BODILY INJURY (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY __.._.. __._.. PROPERTY DAMAGE $ City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood MN 55331 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. City of Shorewood PARTY REGISTRATION AND PERMIT Pursuant to Chapter 505 of the Municipal Code application for a party is made as follows: Party to be Registered Any person or persons sponsoring a party at which it may reasonably be anticipated that there will be more than seventy five (75) persons in attendance shall, prior thereto, register such parry with the City Clerk, giving the location, date, time, purpose, names of all sponsors and the number of persons it is anticipated will be in attendance. Permit for Additional Parties: Within a period of six (6) months following such party, no additional party or parties, at which it may reasonably be anticipated that there will be more than seventy five (75) persons in attendance, shall be permitted at the same location unless the person or persons who propose to sponsor the same shall first have obtained a special permit therefor approved by the City Council. Application for such permit shall be made to the City Clerk. Party Location: }t "` i1 7 1 Date of Party: r ( ) ,X; '��= 'Time: = C Number of Persons ( an tic to Attend. Purpose: t -: Sponsor's Name(s): Special Parking or Safety Provisions: V U:t) C / Prohibitions: —1 1 -) 4 a. No person shall, between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M., congregate because of or participate in any party or gathering of people from which noise emanates of a sufficient volume so as to disturb the peace, quiet or repose of persons residing in any residential area. b . No person shall visit or remain within any residential dwelling unit wherein such party or gathering is taking place except persons who have gone there for the sole purpose of abating the disturbance. (Ord. 101, 8- 14 -78) Enforcement A police officer may order all persons present in any such group or gathering from which such noise emanates, other than the owners or tenants of a dwelling unit, to immediately disperse from said parry in lieu o being charged under this Chapter. (1987 Code) Applicant's Signature: fi �1 % f'� =!� Date: ------------ ---------------- - - - - -- -For Office use Only ------------ - ------------ - - - - -- SLMPSD: Fire Marsl City Regisrrauon: Additional Requirements: Date: Date: Date: Original: City of Shorewood Copy to: South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department Applicant JUN -15 -1998 15:2? SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PD 612 474 4477 P.01 ' SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, 'nnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG (612) 474 -3261 Chiof of Police ME- MORANDUM To: Pamela I From: Chief Rick Young Date: June 15, 1998 Subject: Party Permit The party permit for Elizabeth McDowel is attached. My only comment would be that we have always required a person to be immediately available to remove any barricades should emergency vehicles need to enter the ban 'caded area. Thanks! 7 .1srvrng south Laver Mlnnalanka oJ't eFttur C;reenwood. Shorewood and ToW= Bay TOTAL P.01 JUN -15 -1998 15:28 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PD Cityl of Sht PARTY REGISTRAT 612 474 4477 P.01 Pursuant to Chapter 505 of the M Code p a application for a patty is made a e msag ow anticipate will be than en fivie persons m amp sh�l�� be mister such with tip city A giving the location, date, bane, purpose, names of all and etb number of pew= it awed wW be in aawdwmm • WWun a 'ad of six (t7 mortis Mowing such party, no additional or parties. at which it may be andidpatod tires titre will be more than seventy five persons in attendmhce, shall be 'Clad at ft same lawn uniass the person or persona who Propose to sponso� the same first have obtained a spOaal pamtit tlherefor approved by the: who Cbwcil. Application for mx� 't shall be made to & City perk. Patty Locatiom LIQ () IC F-a , ! Number of Persons (anticipated) to Special Parking or Safety Provisions: V rlr«��, bu r (jl —.4 ProhibtHans: - u - a. ==I stall, betweesi the of ten o'clock (10:40) PAL and arm o'clock 01:04) cegate bec se of pa�rticip to in airy pmty or Su" of people fin which ates of a so as to disturb the pme, greet or repose of perms residing in any rmsidentiat at�ca. b. No person shall vWt or within any reddendai dwel ft unit wberda such party or Vd*dng is taking place peams who have gum them for do sole pthrpose of abating the diet+ . (Ord. Q01. 9-14-78) • Ent A police oil m such noise mss, otbor ftm said party in lied otb Applicant's S' SLMFSD: Fire Nts►c" City Rosh 11 trion: AdditioW Requiremcnts: AVJ Dew: Date: 9 W rtft 8X" y order all pmow present in any stteh grain or gadwft fsom which hen the ov =0 or btx>aais of a dwellft unit, to bmwa2aldy disperse ZM .(1987 t o4e) A��w� •� ell Date: r •r � r omm Vn Vlay wr- � r- r-- rrrr.•rrrrrwrr- rrr..r Date: (- I 19 r TOTAL P.01 r Pursuant to Chapter 505 of the M Code p a application for a patty is made a e msag ow anticipate will be than en fivie persons m amp sh�l�� be mister such with tip city A giving the location, date, bane, purpose, names of all and etb number of pew= it awed wW be in aawdwmm • WWun a 'ad of six (t7 mortis Mowing such party, no additional or parties. at which it may be andidpatod tires titre will be more than seventy five persons in attendmhce, shall be 'Clad at ft same lawn uniass the person or persona who Propose to sponso� the same first have obtained a spOaal pamtit tlherefor approved by the: who Cbwcil. Application for mx� 't shall be made to & City perk. Patty Locatiom LIQ () IC F-a , ! Number of Persons (anticipated) to Special Parking or Safety Provisions: V rlr«��, bu r (jl —.4 ProhibtHans: - u - a. ==I stall, betweesi the of ten o'clock (10:40) PAL and arm o'clock 01:04) cegate bec se of pa�rticip to in airy pmty or Su" of people fin which ates of a so as to disturb the pme, greet or repose of perms residing in any rmsidentiat at�ca. b. No person shall vWt or within any reddendai dwel ft unit wberda such party or Vd*dng is taking place peams who have gum them for do sole pthrpose of abating the diet+ . (Ord. Q01. 9-14-78) • Ent A police oil m such noise mss, otbor ftm said party in lied otb Applicant's S' SLMFSD: Fire Nts►c" City Rosh 11 trion: AdditioW Requiremcnts: AVJ Dew: Date: 9 W rtft 8X" y order all pmow present in any stteh grain or gadwft fsom which hen the ov =0 or btx>aais of a dwellft unit, to bmwa2aldy disperse ZM .(1987 t o4e) A��w� •� ell Date: r •r � r omm Vn Vlay wr- � r- r-- rrrr.•rrrrrwrr- rrr..r Date: (- I 19 r TOTAL P.01 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMIS COUNCIL CHAl1. COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1998 7:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING Chair Puzak called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. A . Roll Call Present: Chair Puzak; Commissioners Colopoulos (arrived 7:35), Bensman, Dallman, Amst, Themig and Cochran; Administrator Jim Hurm; Council Liaison Roger Champa; Director of Public Works, Larry Brown Absent: None Also present: Brian Lieffers of Tonka United Soccer Association and Park Foundation, Christine Lizee, Ingrid Schaff. Later arrivals: Brian Tische and Gordon Lindstrom of South Tonka Little League B . Review Agenda Chair Puzak asked to add a tour of Badger Park to the end of the meeting if there was enough daylight. All agreed to add the tour as Agenda Item #11 if the meeting ended early enough. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A . Park Commission Meeting Minutes of May 27, 1998 Arnst moved, Cochran seconded to approve the minutes as presented. Motion passed 510 with Puzak and Colopoulos abstaining. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Resident Christine Lizee (27055 Smithtown Road) stated that she is concerned with the Mayor's need to do his own study of the trail survey and wished the Park Commission continued luck as they look at the subject of trails for the City of Shorewood. 4. REPORTS - A . Park Tours Chair Puzak asked if the notes from the Park Tours were found to be complete and accurate as presented in the meeting packet. There were no changes. Commissioner Arnst noted that the parks were found to be in good condition overall and complimented the Public Works Department for doing a terrific job at paying attention to detail. Chair Puzak agreed that there were fewer needs to address than there have been in the past, crediting staff for keeping with the "To Do List" for park projects. Public Works Director Brown will pass on the good report to the crew. B . Trail Plan Administrator Hurm reported that 100 more letters requesting participants for the Citizen Review Group have been mailed since the last meeting. There are 10 volunteers from the first request letters. Follow -up calls will be made to the recipients of these 100 if needed in order to reach a PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 2 total of 12 to 15 members. It was agreed to strive for 15 (or more), but a group of 12 members is still a go. Meeting dates for the group have been moved to the three middle Thursdays of July. Commissioner Arnst noted that the printed material given out by Bill Morris at his presentation to the Park Commission contained one table that was in error. A correction was noted in the meeting minutes of May 27. Commissioner Bensman stated that the results of the survey need to be communicated to the public. Administrator Hurm said that they will be shown in their entirety on the City's web page with a summary, written in the Citizen Informer newsletter. Commissioner Bensman asked about a press release, which Administrator Hurm said is also possible. The intent is to have the full survey on the web site as soon as staff can complete the project. Chair Puzak pointed out that anything that is shown in summary form should be clearly stated as such. The final report from Decision Resources will include an Executive Summary. There was further discussion about the need for the Park Commission to remain neutral and not attempt to interpret the survey results or imply a conclusion. Administrator Hurm stated that the reasons for the survey were first to get data and secondly, for the use of the Citizen Review Group in their study. 'It was agreed that the survey clearly indicates enough interest to continue the process and proceed with the Citizen Review Group. C . Update regarding what Minnewashta School has toward their goal for the playground equipment Administrator Hurm reported that the parent group which is coordinating the playground fund- raiser has not reached its goal and the process is still continuing. Commissioner Themig brought up the subject of the dock at Crescent Beach. He asked if a consensus had been reached about the dock's placement. Public Works Director Brown reported that he had contacted Minnetonka Community Education and Services and they were adamant that the dock needs to be in a depth of 3 feet of water. The City of Tonka Bay agreed and the dock has been placed. 5. COMMUNICATIONS WITH TONKA UNITED SOCCER Brian Lieffers, the Tonka United Soccer Association (TUSA) liaison to the Park Foundation was introduced by Chair Puzak. Chair Puzak explained that Brian is the one representative from TUSA who was willing and available to meet with the Park Commission and discuss the needs of the Freeman fields. Decisions about the CIP (Item #6) are hinging on this matter. Brian explained that he is relatively new to the Soccer Association. He has conveyed to their Board the need to meet with the Park Commission as soon as possible to go through the grant and vision now in light of the reduced funds awarded. Commissioner Themig asked him if there is an urgency to reconstruct the fields this year. Brian indicated that if it were urgent, other representatives would be in attendance for this meeting. Commissioner Colopoulos pointed out that what began as the City's willingness to sign for the grant on TUSA's behalf has ended up as a $60,000 hit on the CIP. Administrator Hurm explained that the early estimates were much less and the grant was to be greater than it ended up to be. When the final number of $30,000 each was presented to TUSA and to the Park Commission, both groups gasped ...and are still gasping. Chair Puzak suggested lowering the scope of the project to free up some CIP money to go to the General Fund for redistribution to other projects. He added that while the Park Commission is here to help and support sports organizations, it cannot act without a commitment from them. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 3 Administrator Hurm reminded the Park Commission that the CIP is still only a draft and they have not yet recommended this $30,000 expenditure. He suggested that they work on policies since this is a precedent that has not been set. Commissioner Themig agreed that they should develop guidelines for consistency, citing the example of the very different arrangements with the Little League which provides its own capital. Administrator Hurm noted that the issue of safety has made the soccer field repair a different matter. 6. REVIEW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Chair Puzak said that he didn't believe that the $60,000 expense will happen in one year. He suggested a rethinking of the expenditures for 1998, recognizing that more will need to be done in the future, in order to make room for change. Administrator Hurm pointed out that the draft version of the CIP does reflect that the Soccer Association would be paying all $60,000 back to the City at $10,000 per year, adding that the CIP still needs to go to the City Council to be considered final. Chair Puzak said that it should be clearly marked "DRAFT" and that only the 1998 column is what the Council approves. Commissioner Themig noted that 4 of the 1998 items have been accepted by the Park Commission for the projects to proceed. Commissioner Arnst asked how much of the $60,000 would be needed to do only maintenance work on the soccer fields. Brown said that normal care is paid for out of the regular budget. This means that the entire $60,000 could be re- allocated. Chair Puzak said that the options are to either roll those funds to 1999 or to redistribute that money. He added that he is unsettled about the Minnewashta play equipment funding and would like to revisit that issue. Puzak moved, Arnst seconded to support the Minnewashta Playground in the amount of $3,000 cash plus $1,000 in equipment use and labor. Commissioner Bensman asked how far the Minnewashta group is from reaching their goal. Administrator Hurm said they still need about $30,000. Commissioner Cochran gave his support because the play area is used by non - students and he thinks it is a worthy project. It also shows that the City cares about playgrounds. Commissioner Dallman spoke against the expenditure, explaining that park funds should go to City Parks and not the school districts property. Commissioner Colopoulos was also opposed because the trend of the school district asking others . for financial support could accelerate. Commissioner Arnst supports the donation because it is more than a school playground. It is for the entire community. Commissioner Themig noted that it is similar to what the City asks of the sports organizations in providing for park facilities which are used by the community as well. Commissioner Colopoulos asked if the City should have a partnership with the - schools as it does with those sports organizations. Chair Puzak said that he has known the Minnetonka schools to share their rescues and that there is a "partnering" between the schools and the community. Motion passed 5/2. Dallman and Colopoulos opposed. Discussion went back to the budget and the $60,000 still showing for soccer fields. Themig suggested leaving that line item with no amount attached to it until TUSA comes back with a proposal. There was a consensus to show zero dollars for the 1998 schedule for soccer fields. This leaves a fund balance on December 31, 1998 of $157,178. Commissioner Arnst asked if the magic square project could be moved to this year. Brown said that it could still be done this season. Commissioner Themig asked if the magic square is part of the topcoating of the basketball court at Cathcart. Brown said "no" and that there are separate funds to also move ahead with that project. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 9, 1998 -PAGE 4 Arnst moved, Colopoulos seconded to move the Magic Square project from the year 2000 to 1998 and let Public Works Director, Larry Brown proceed with research, design and cost estimates. The motion passed 7/0. Administrator Hurm asked if the CIP is now ready to recommend to the City Council as is? Commissioner Dallman brought up the subject of Park Foundation's efforts to move ahead with the Freeman park building. He asked if the $60,000 from 1999 could now be moved to 1998 to help speed that project along. The Foundation has funds for getting a plan and cost estimate. If the price is reasonable, and if other funds could be raised, he thought the Park Foundation could then proceed this year or at least get started. Commissioner Themig recommended that the sanitary sewer also be done, rather than be considered a future, separate project. Chair Puzak reminded the Commission that this topic is not on the agenda and that it is a subject that the Citizen Review Group will have input on as part of their work. It would be premature to approve the expenditure, but not the change to the CIP. Dallman moved, Cochran seconded to transfer $60,000 for the Park Building and $40,000 for Sanitary Sewer from 1999 to 1998 on the CIP. Brown pointed out that it is late in the season to do the preliminary work and the construction yet this season. Commissioner Amst suggested moving enough funds for the design and gathering of information and table other decisions until another meeting. Commissioner Bensman asked if there was a psychological factor in providing the funds sooner than planned. Commissioner Dallman agreed that this would show the City's support and would generate movement on the part of the Park Foundation toward fund raising efforts. Commissioner Bensman agreed that this can be true. Commissioner Themig asked if $60,000 covers only a portion of the cost. Commissioner Dallman said that it represents the full estimate. Commissioner Colopoulos asked if it is the role of the Foundation or the Park Commission to approve a design. Commissioner Dallman replied that the purpose of the Park Foundation is to raise funds for on -going park needs. Their intent is to get civic donations. Commissioner Themig noted that the City Council really has the final say on all of these matters. The vote on the motion currently on the floor was taken. The motion passed 6/0. Themig abstained. • 7. REVIEW TOURNAMENT APPLICATION Chair Puzak asked if the application included in the meeting packet is the amended version. Administrator Hurm said that it is. Commissioner Dallman felt that the first sentence is awkward and needs some editing. Commissioner Themig suggested that it is sometimes beneficial to use bullets for important items and asked that this be considered for parts of paragraph #2. Commissioner Arnst agreed. Administrator Hurm will revise the application accordingly and bring it back in final form to be submitted for approval. 8. LITTLE LEAGUE PRESENTATION ON FIELDS This discussion was postponed until the arrival of Little League representative, Gordon Lindstrom. 9. OLD BUSINESS There was none. 10. NEW BUSINESS PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 9, 1998 -PAGE 5 There was none. 8. LITTLE LEAGUE PRESENTATION ON FIELDS (revisited) Brian Tische, coach with South Tonka Little League explained that the League has been working on the reconfiguration of the fields this year and thanked the City for their help with Field #3. They are now looking at Field #2 for reconfiguration to alleviate foul ball problems and make the area more presentable. A layout has been put together and estimates are in for the cost of reconstruction. Tische explained the new arrangement, noting that the cost is around $50,000. They are in the process of lining up funding with the Legion and Tonka Men's Club and other fund - raising ideas. Registration fees will also help with the cost. He is asking the Park Commission for their blessing before they proceed further. He added that safety is a factor in the reconfiguration which will improve traffic flow. Commissioner Themig asked Tische if this creates exclusive use for the South Tonka Little League. The reply was no, it does not. Chair Puzak asked for clarification that the goal is to follow the process for proceeding with the plan and not to ask for financial support or funding. Gordon Lindstrom, representative of the South Tonka Little League, explained that the cost will be paid by outside donations, but that they may ask the City to front some of the costs, to be paid back within 3 years. Commissioner Colopoulos noted that the context of this request is different from others and should be viewed with the same policy. If the Commission is entertaining giving money or loans, they need to catalogue the protocol. Commissioners Amst and Themig added that this subject has been looked at during past meetings and we still have questions on the funding aspect. Chair Puzak asked that the Little League draw up a plan with an overhead view, offer a tour of the field and walk the Commissioners through the planned changes, perhaps with flags marking the new layout. Commissioner Bensman asked if the League has been talking about this for a long time. Lindstrom said that this has been given a lot of consideration. The current layout is confining. The new plan is a duplicate of Field #3, only larger. Commissioner Colopoulos commended the League for the excellent design. Chair Puzak clarified the plan. He asked that the Little League have the design, host a tour and 40 show the strengths and weakness. Second, they need to firm up the money needs, propose a plan and come back to the Park Commission to present it. Once there is a physical package, the Park Commission can take action and make a recommendation to the City Council. Administrator Hurm pointed out that the netting and poles are still planned for this year, but were delayed because of the storms. Chair Puzak suggested that the netting project be postponed because the baseball season ends in four weeks. Commissioner Colopoulos had talked with one resident who was waiting for this to be done and he is aware of the impact of the storms. He will go back to that resident to explain. Chair Puzak will also go, saying that the extenuating circumstances have postponed the installation of nets. Administrator Hurm said the City will still get the poles from NSP. Commissioner Dallman asked when the reconstruction of Field #2 should be done in order for it to be ready for use in the spring. Lindstrom said that August is the ideal time. Commissioner Arnst noted that this matter exemplifies the need to settle on a policies for the future. Commissioner Themig suggested that the Commission meet in work session format on June 23 to address that topic. All agreed that Arnst, Themig and Hurm will gather data with staff help and put ideas together. Administrator Hurm will then prepare a draft for the meeting on the 27th. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 9, 1998 -PAGE 6 11. BADGER PARK TOUR It was agreed to postpone the tour of Badger until another meeting because of darkness. Bensman moved, Colopoulos seconded to adjourn the meeting. Chair Puzak interjected that the idea for posting "Center Car Here" signs in the outer parking lot of Freeman Park should be retracted. After seeing the need to have open space for other purposes (brush drop off, for example), it seems best to leave that area clear. Alternative ideas may be considered at a later meeting. Motion passed and the meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Connie Bastyr Recording Secretary • 6/9/98 DRAFT is PROJECT SCHEDULE - PARKS SOURCE SUMMARY - PARKS 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FREEMAN: Fund Balance, Jan 1 $162,564 54,142 40,574 66,753 Soccer Fields Park Dedication Fees 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Park Building 60,00 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Sanitary Sewer 40,00 - -- -_- ___ __- Overlay Street Soccer Association - -- ___ 8,000 _ -_ Netting at #2, parking at #3 *7,50 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 Grills, pads, landscaping, fountains, shelter, electric *9,50 - -- 3,000 3,000 BADGER: Projects/Expenditures (136,000) (35,500) - -- (8,000) Overlay Tennis Courts Tfr to General Fund - Maint. 4,500 (12,000) (13,000) (14,000) CATHCART: Interest Income 2,5781 1,9321 3,1791 4,0881 Benches and overlay courts *5,00 54,1421 40,5741 66,7531 85,841 Warming house The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to finance improvement in the city's park system. Revenues are derived from park dedication fees from land subdivisions within the City, budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and the Shorewood Parks Foundation. Expenditures shown are for improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be allocated to future park improvements. 26,000 SILVERWOOD: Warming house 32,00 MANOR: Lighting Project *6,00 Magic Square 5 OTHER: Minnewashta Playground 3 Skate Park 5,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $136,00q $35,500 - -- $8,0001$32,00 NOTE: No funds are set aside for: relocating Field #2 and Freeman tennis court 1 icvivubly auiuviizrLL w prviceeu FUNDING- SOURCE SUMMARY - PARKS 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Fund Balance, Jan 1 $162,564 54,142 40,574 66,753 85,841 Park Dedication Fees 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 General Fund Contribution 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Donations - -- -_- ___ __- ___ Soccer Association - -- ___ -__ _ -_ Sports Organizations - park Maint. 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 Parks Foundation :Bldg - -- 3,000 3,000 3,000 Projects/Expenditures (136,000) (35,500) - -- (8,000) (32,000) Tfr to General Fund - Maint. (11,000) (12,000) (13,000) (14,000) (15,000) Interest Income 2,5781 1,9321 3,1791 4,0881 3,842 Fund Balance Dec 31 54,1421 40,5741 66,7531 85,841 80,683 The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to finance improvement in the city's park system. Revenues are derived from park dedication fees from land subdivisions within the City, budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and the Shorewood Parks Foundation. Expenditures shown are for improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be allocated to future park improvements. AW 1 2. Project Schedule Adopted in 1997 PROJECT SCHEDULE — PARKS 1998 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 5162,564 BADGER: 567,639 $55,374 570,814 Park Dedication Fees 15,000 a Horseshoe Pit, Shuffleboard 10,000 10,000 General Fund Contribution 10.000 - -- e Well Building Picnic Shelter 10,000 Donations - -- - -- - -- c Overlav Tennis Courts Sports Organizations - park plaint. 4.500 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 CATHCART: - -- 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 d Warming House, Picnic Shelter (4,500) (28,000) 28,000 (32,000) Tfr to General Fund - plaint. e Overlay Tennis Court 4,000 (14,000) (15,000) Interest Income 3.110 465 SILVERWOOD: 440 815 Fund Balance Dec 31 $56.6741 567,6391 f Warming House, Picnic Shelter $54,629 The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to finance improvement in the city's park system. Revenues are derived from park dedication fees from land subdivisions within the City, budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and the Shorewood Parks Foundation. Expenditures shown are for improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be allocated to future park improvements. 32,04 FREEMAN: Cr Building North - Loan *50,000 h Tennis courts(2)? 50,000 i Parking & Street Overlav 10,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 5 134,0001 S 4,5001 528,000 5 532,00 3. Funding Source Summary FUNDING SOURCE- SUMMARY - PARKS 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Fund Balance, Jan 1 5162,564 556,674 567,639 $55,374 570,814 Park Dedication Fees 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 General Fund Contribution 10.000 - -- - -- - -- - -- Donations - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Sports Organizations - park plaint. 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 Parks Foundation - BldE v - -- 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Projects/Expenditures (134,000) (4,500) (28,000) (32,000) Tfr to General Fund - plaint. (11,000) (12,000) (13,000) (14,000) (15,000) Interest Income 3.110 465 735 440 815 Fund Balance Dec 31 $56.6741 567,6391 S55,3741 570,814 $54,629 The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to finance improvement in the city's park system. Revenues are derived from park dedication fees from land subdivisions within the City, budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and the Shorewood Parks Foundation. Expenditures shown are for improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be allocated to future park improvements. * Approximately $3,000 is planned to be spent through 1998 on building planning. 25 U • u June 9, 1998 Dear City of Shorewood, Late last fall the Minnewashta Elementary PTO began a fund raising project to raise $60,000.00 in order to replace our existing playground structure. Many parts of the playground are in need of repair or replacement, but work cannot be done because it would still not meet existing safety code. In addition, the playground is currently not handicap accessible. Minnewashta Elementary playground is utilized by students from several communities, including Shorewood Tonka Bay and Chanhassen, as well as many community youth sports organizations. To date we have raised over half of the money required to install the new playground. With some creative financing, we will purchase the equipment before the fall. However, the PTO will be responsible to repay the funds by the end of the 1998 -99 school year. We strongly feel that our children, the majority of which are from Shorewood, cannot wait another year to have a safe and fun playground! When we began this project, most Cities and service organizations had already established a budget and were unable to contribute to this community project. It is at this time that the Minnewashta PTO is respectfully requesting that a contribution be • considered in your upcoming budget year. We need your help! Your name and amount of your donation will be permanently placed on the playground structure as a way of saying Thank You. The children and families using our playground for years to come will certainly appreciate your support. The Minnewashta playground committee would be happy to make a presentation at one of your meetings, if you so desire. Please feel free to contact Sheila Johnston at 470 -8799 or Sara LaBelle at 470 -0374 with any further questions. We look forward to your support in this important community project! Sincerely, Sheila K. Johnston Minnewashta PTO WN tzXR EM historic 400mwn�� Excelsior EXCELSIOR AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Bob Bushnell, 0 of July chair Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce c/o Bushnell's Minnetonka Music 250 Water St. Excelsior, MN 55331 Jim Hurm, City Administrator 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: 1998 4' of July celebration Dear Jim; in w ?GCS i On the shores of Lake Minnetonka The Fourth of July fireworks display is coming up again. The Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce is trying to keep the event alive and in the course of doing this we are seeking continued support from those who have helped keep this hundred year tradition going. The 4` of July fireworks celebration on Excelsior Bay is the only Lake Minnetonka celebration. This event is costly as you are aware and we greatly appreciate your help in sponsoring it in the past. We need help paying for police ($2000 in '95), Biffs ($800), various permits, advertising and, of course, the fireworks ($13,500). We would appreciate your continued support of this event and if you could send more it would be wonderful . Thank you. • Gratef eell, o Bof July celebration chair Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce 474 -3277 / 474 -6589 fax:474 -8977 ON POST OFFICE BOX 32 * EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • PHONE (612) 474.6461 A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ' DATE: June 18, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Inflow and Infiltration Report Prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc. The City of Shorewood is a past recipient of a grant from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) for the preparation of a study to help identify areas of inflow and infiltration (I/I). The attached report prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc. meets the requirements of the grant. In review of the report, Figure 2 appeared most interesting in demonstrating the effects of UI within the metered portion of the system. Some of the more drastic peaks spiked form the average flow of 1.0 million gallons per day to approximately 2.75 million gallons per day. The report also states that based upon the current rates charged by MCES of $1,370 /million gallons treated, that the City of Shorewood's cost for treating clear water due to VI is estimated at $101,000 annually. The report outlines specific steps for further UI reduction. Specifically, televising 10 percent of the sanitary sewer lines - annually, performing additional manhole inspections, adding "chimney seals" to all manholes when roadway repairs are performed, and making any necessary repairs, as discovered. In total, the program outlines approximately $84,700 of VI reduction be performed to the system annually. It is also pointed out that while it is impossible to reduce VI totally, the proposed annual expenditures should save the city dollars for treatment of I/I over the long haul. Therefore, staff is recommending that the attached resolution accepting the I/I report be approved. If approved, this report outlining the City's plan of attack for reducing I/I will be forwarded to MCES for approval. t- «� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER �' CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98— A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY PREPARED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, Resolution 96 -49 authorized application for a grant from the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES) for the purpose of reduction of inflow and infiltration (UI) into the sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood entered into an agreement with MCES on November 11, 1996 for a matching grant of $10,000; and WHEREAS, said grant agreement calls for the preparation of an I/I study which investigates I/I sources and outlines a plan for I/I reduction; and WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, Inc. has prepared said III Study dated May, 1998; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: The Inflow and Infiltration Study dated May, 1998, prepared by WSB and Associates, Inc. is approved along with recommendations stated in the report for work to be performed for the specific purpose of reduction of I/I into the sanitary sewer system. 1998. 0 ATTEST ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 22nd day of June, TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR .a CITY OF S HOREWO OD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net /shorewood • cityhall@Shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works l�r • DATE: June 18, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract to Allied Blacktop. Attachment 1 is the bid tabulation for the sealcoating which shows the total amount for the bids of the sealcoating project for the Cites of Excelsior, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay. Shorewood's portion of the project was bid as follows: Allied Blacktop Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Engineer's Estimate $ 37,1 64.94 $ 39,049.30 $ 38,778.60 Since the low bid is within budget, below the engineer's estimate, and is known to be a responsible contractor, it is recommended that the attached resolution which accepts the bids and awards the contract for 1998 sealcoating project to Allied Blacktop be approved. T� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER, CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING OF STREETS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for local improvements designated as Bituminous Seal Coating of Streets for the Cities of Excelsior, Shorewood, and Tonka Bay, Minnesota, bids were received, opened on June 17, 1998 and tabulated according to law, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Allied Blacktop Company, is the lowest bidder in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: • 1. That the Mayor and City Administrator /Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a joint contract with the Cities of Excelsior, Tonka Bay and Allied Blacktop Company, in the name of the City of Shorewood, Bituminous 1998 Sealcoating of Streets, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Administrator /Clerk. 2. That the City Administrator /Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all the bidders the deposits made with their bids, except for the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22nd day of June, 1998. Tom Dahlberg, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk CITIES OF-EXCELSIOR, SHOREWOOD AND TONKA BAY, MINNESOTA SEAL COAT PROJECT 1998 BID TABULATION 1:30 P.M. June 17, 1998 0 Attest I hereby certify that the bids tabulated here are a true and correct representation of bids received and opened on this date rya C- JamiA C. Hurm Lawrence A. Brown, Cit4 Administrator Director of Public Works Exhibit A CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 -8927 • (612) 474 -3236 FAX (612) 474 -0128 • www.state.net/shorewood • cityhall @shorewood.state.net • 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Worksj DATE: June 18, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Bituminous Overlay Project The Capital Improvement Program budgets $80,000 annually for bituminous overlays. As such, the following streets are proposed to be overlaid in 1998: A resolution is attached which authorizes advertisement for bids. .s PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER *I0 1998 OVERLAY PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 98 -03 NORTH CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA SHOREWOOD STREET y a��y / raT, J = i ; :[.. "Y N r `0", «; .{. ✓rt a xn (u" N FROM EGLENCOE O � srRarG PAR [.{ "J - [ .�,1 "• ),,,:, " , S ( [ 79/�POP. ` " " „Nrxrw ,,� Nxn ^R�`9 p O BLVD. CIT TONKA BEACH ORONO S BAY ROAD Irfa POPm r1 I➢t0 POP. 7j COVINGTON ROAD OL�� LAFAYETTE 3 GALPIN LAKE ROM PARK STREET CIT lU 1S:+r. ` - E 5 {� G = ir: inr•{;rror `.. -.. + �{['' C '_ OAD AL'S xN PH ° J Y•v.I••e I INI UU � LN SPRIN CAR ,.` . i BAY p ^ � 6 � 1�� ,l•N PS BAY LAKE MINNETONKA UPPER LAKE °= SMITH 1 � N— _ • N C` rwn ro,r SHOREWOOD W 1990 POP. S•/7 i err TONGA BAY wo, aoP� z „Y v' fit S ow t utl O GLENCOE ROAD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL DEAD END �/ fr.v (•x/•rI {l.vp� N V of fl "•x,eN" • � (� � ECHO ' �A q �,J" [.`� {,Nf Hit ��. ` 11I w `',• ,• ruMlr w I t. /• Ye• ,r{. N. +�,� xu ° � Y, mx GREENWOOIf P. + " �+� ° °` V „• ° e rre rr � � .; I99• POP 6tL `� - nu N w �[ �a� _9/♦ • �� C [ `' � • /,/ �, ct ,a y. : �. `a • 8t J rti �` h , .. Y l � [tai .P„L�$`�rr y v� a rx � rii. '`= 7 y � � ltvr r S i1 •/r r�,• `�� ");XCELSI0 J• " 3 e �l"1 d '3 i �� O o• GIDEON IBA+lI Isto POP. pia i i :• [ /��. n n . r f.� . 4 lu w ' i gyp p wus q �'°'° ` ��\ s ° /.e "Jr�•r•,y +'�k \E�� n ST BAY\� NS. � N •.. ts�.....," 4 + n 3 N 2= `/ CHRIST ° ti ? LAKE }� / "r N .[. Na� `8 / a v t4 w * ; CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION N0.98 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BIDS FOR 1997 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT WHEREAS, the 1998 Operating Budget and Capital Finance Plan designates $80,000 for street overlays; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has identified streets within the City that need bituminous overlay in 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council is hereby authorizes advertisement for bids for the 1998 city street overlay project. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22nd day of July, 1998. Tom Dahlberg, Mayor ATTEST: is James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk �1 �, To: Mayor and City Council From: Connie Bastyr, Communications Technician Cr Date: June 15, 1998 Re: Shoreline Summaries Since the Last Report to Council Since the report at the May 11, 1998 City Council meeting there have been several new . messages left on the Shoreline. They date from May 16 to June 9 and are summarized as follows: Spring Clean -up Calls There were a total of 15 Spring Clean-up calls to the Shoreline, primarily to leave addresses for missed pick -up. One caller added a comment of appreciation for the program. All addresses were forwarded to BFI for service. Storm Related Calls Thirteen calls were logged for storm related problems. Most were people who just needed clarification on the policy and drop -off information. A few thanked the City for providing the drop -off and pick -up service. One caller thought the City did a "pathetic job of handling the storm clean-up." He felt there was a lack of effort to clean up the damaged neighborhoods and that the City did so little to help the residents. He was also upset that it took city crews three days to show up after the storm and that he was without power for 6 days. Those who asked for a response were called. Miscellaneous Calls • A resident called to see if anyone had looked into a regulation requiring lawn services to put up signs when they spray or use chemicals on the lawn. Her dog had become ill in the previous month from exposure to chemicals on her lawn and she had called City Hall to see if there was a policy. She had anticipated seeing reference to the matter in the June issue of the Citizen Informer. Jim Hurm spoke with the resident by telephone and she has not decided whether she will approach the City Council about the matter. • There was one very positive call to the Shoreline in regard to the Citizen Informer. A copy is attached. (This one is my personal favorite.) Voicemail Message to Jim Hurm Also attached is a written voicemail recording that was left for Jim Hurm on June 4. It is not a Shoreline message, but it is included because it is a compliment to the Public Works crew and we thought the Council would like to see what this resident reported. $l1B Shoreline message from Friday, June 5, 1998 Hi. This is Margaret Lowe and I'm just calling to commend Connie Bastyr and team on the wonderful newsletter. We just got it yesterday and I have read it cover to cover. We've just been so impressed with the changes and improvements. It's immensely readable, it's inviting, it's completely informative. We look forward to receiving it. So thanks for the good work. And it's great to feel connected to our community. Bye. T " • • Voicemail Message to Jim Hurm on June 4, 1998 My name is John Silano. I live on 5060 Shady Island Point in Mound. Today your people were out here cleaning up the storm damage. I just wanted to call and compliment them and thank them for an outstanding job. They really truly did a spectacular job! They were very careful and they were very thorough and they were very polite and courteous. The job they did just absolutely amazed me. I thought they would just kind of hit the high spots, but they didn't. They just did a real professional job. Everybody on our street, the Telanders, the Soderans, the Soranos are very very grateful for the fine job they did. If they would have done a bad job I would have complained so I figure — they did a great job —the very least I could do for the guys that were working is'to thank them and compliment them. That's all. Thank you very much • it - - C] r� L To: Mayor and City Council From: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Date: June 17, 1998 Re: Schedule of Council Work Sessions cc: Department Heads, Planning and Park Commissions This is a list of dates and topics which have been identified for work sessions. 1998 Schedule of Work Sessions Scheduled Date: Topic: 6/15 Rescheduled to 6/22 6/22 Liquor Operation Status Review Assessor Position Status Review 6/29 Review Proposed Adult Use Regulations Discussion on Telecommunications Consultant 7/6 No Meetin 7/20 Home Occupation Permits * July Discussion of a Policy Survey with Decision Resources * Park Festival * Discussion on Metropolitan Council * 8/17 1999 -2003 CIP * 8/24 Initiative of 1999 Budget Considerations * Potential Dates and Issues for Work Session Topics #-Il,b 4 , CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JUNE 22, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 10, 1998 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED AMOUNT STORM DEADLINE POSTAGE PERA DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID UNION DUES STATE TAX WITHHELD JUNE RECYCLING -TB LIQ SEC 125 REIMB. FLYER DELIVERY/MILEAGE PAGER WATER PURCHASE TAPE DUPLICATOR SEC 125 REIMB /MILEAGE SEC 125 REIMB FUEL COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX/FUEL BEER PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE FREIGHT MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE UTILITIES MISC/POP PURCHASE DEADBOLT LOCK LIQUOR PURCHASE MISC/SUPPLY PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE/MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE LIQUOR/WNE PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $467.62 3,090.18 1,203.07 1,100.77 156.50 139.80 1,433.92 33.66 192.30 52.03 8.63 73.16 378.08 248.94 100.00 384.85 406.96 78.25 939.18 12,141.60 21, 042.25 12, 806.00 220.00 1,125.04 2,675.38 24,279.05 7,691.68 113.40 123.25 3,403.44 693.25 807.94 14,402.74 11,818.49 1,940.00 8,180.77 1,574.35 543.20 343.00 $136,412.7 Page 1 23180 US POSTMASTER 23181 PERA 23182 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 23183 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 23184 ANOKA CO SUPPORT /COLLECT 23185 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 23186 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 23187 BROWNING FERRIS IND. 23188 KATHLEEN HEBERT 23189 DREW KRIESEL 23190 23191 MINNCOMM PAGING CITY OF MINNETONKA 23192 MTKA SOUND & LIGHTING 23193 JOSEPH PAZANDAK 23194 ALAN ROLEK 23195 SUPERAMERICA 23196 US WEST 23197 LAWRENCE NICCUM 23198 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING 23199 DAY DISTRIBUTING 23200 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. 23201 MARK VII 23202 MARLIN'S TRUCKING 23203 NORTH STAR ICE 23204 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS 23205 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. 23206 NORTHERN STATES POWER 23207 PEPSI COLA CO. 23208 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS CO. 23209 BELLBOY CORP. 23210 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY 23211 MIDWEST COCA -COLA 23212 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. 23213 JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR 23214 LAKE REGION VENDING 23215 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 23216 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS 23217 THE WINE COMPANY 23218 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC. STORM DEADLINE POSTAGE PERA DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID UNION DUES STATE TAX WITHHELD JUNE RECYCLING -TB LIQ SEC 125 REIMB. FLYER DELIVERY/MILEAGE PAGER WATER PURCHASE TAPE DUPLICATOR SEC 125 REIMB /MILEAGE SEC 125 REIMB FUEL COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX/FUEL BEER PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE FREIGHT MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE UTILITIES MISC/POP PURCHASE DEADBOLT LOCK LIQUOR PURCHASE MISC/SUPPLY PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE/MISC PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE LIQUOR/WNE PURCHASE LIQUORNVINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASE TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $467.62 3,090.18 1,203.07 1,100.77 156.50 139.80 1,433.92 33.66 192.30 52.03 8.63 73.16 378.08 248.94 100.00 384.85 406.96 78.25 939.18 12,141.60 21, 042.25 12, 806.00 220.00 1,125.04 2,675.38 24,279.05 7,691.68 113.40 123.25 3,403.44 693.25 807.94 14,402.74 11,818.49 1,940.00 8,180.77 1,574.35 543.20 343.00 $136,412.7 Page 1 CHECK APPHOVAL LES! FOR JUNE 22. 1006 COUNCIL Mb`, CHECKU -------- VENDOR NAME ------------------------- 7E CH 1 p T 1 Oil.! ------------------------ I'D L - f -------- ----------- Hil 0 U N! i 23219 ABDO, ABDO, AND EICK AUDI! SERV 1 CE PROF SER 1, 3 7 4. 00 AUDI! SERVICES WATER DE 183. 20 AUDIf SERVICES SEWER DE 183.20 AUDI! SERVICES LIQUOR 185.20 AUDIT SERVICES LIQUOR 183.20 AUDIf SERVICES LIQUOR 185.20 Ww* TOTAL FOR ABDO, ABDO, AND EICK 2,290.0 0 23220 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY CLEAN UP DEADLINE POSTCD SANIT/WA 23. DOG ORDINANCE INSERT COUNCIL 56.82 TOTAL FOR ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 80.6.1. 23221 ANTHOWS FLORAL FLOWERS COUNCIL Q V..._..._.._ BARCO MUNIMPAL PRODUCTS BATTERIES CITYGAR 63. 8_ 23223 jRK, INC GRASS SEED-PARKS -------- 654.9,i 25224 0j"S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC SAFETY VESTS CITY GAR 215. 00 2322S ERICKSON, ROLF E.A. ASSESSOR FE.E. PROF SER 4,025.00 ASSESSOR SUPPLIES PROF SER 115.08 TOTAL FOR ERICKSON, ROLF E. A. 4,140.08 23226 EXCELSIOR OF 2ND QTR SEWER JOINT USE SEWER DE 2.785.Y3 23221 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT CONTAINER RENTAL WATER DE 25.00 23228 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS CITY - - w...._»9 GOODWILL EASTER SEALS SPRING CLEAN UP TRAILER RECYCLIN 362. 50 23230 HOISINGTON/KUEGLER GROUP PARK PLANNEF' PARKS & 217.44 23231 HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY EQUIP MAIM CITY GAR 17 4. 6 el 23232 KENNEDY & GRAVEN MAY GENERAL LEGAL PROF SER 3,S42.09 MAY LEGAL REBILL -------- 200. 0 MAY SR C 1 LEGAL. PROJECTS 1,143.10 MAY LEGAL-PERKINS -------- 812.50 MAY LEGAL-RYAN 770.8, MAY LEGAL-WATER -------- 119. 20 TOTAL FOR KENNEDY & GRAVEN 6,94Y.12 23233 LOCATOR & MONITOR SALES SEWER MAIN[ SEWER DE 2 4 8 . 1 `5 23234 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY EQUIP MAIN! CITY GAR 191.0`3 23235 MEDTOX LABORATORIES DRUG TESTING -------- 46. 00 23236 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT JULY SEWER ALLOCATION SEWER DE 2 `:: 3 4. 5 --S� 2323V MN SUN PUBLICATIONS LEGAL ADS 215.28' S CITY OF SHORENO/ CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR JUNE 22, 1998 COUNCIL hTG CHECRU VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMO -------- ------------------------- ------------------------ -------- ----------- «** TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL 98,332'24 *** TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 234,744'97 Page 3 LEGAL ADS GEN GOVT 205-96 TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS 42I-24 23236 MOUND—CITY OF SRO QTR FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PRO I,954'50 23239 MUHlTECH, INC. JULY WATER MAlHT WATER DE 4,48S'00 JULY SEWER MAINT SEWER DE 2,415'00 TOTAL FOR MUNlTECH, INC. 6~900'00 23240 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE BLDG MAlHT MUH BLDG I7-3.5 SHOP SUPPLIES CITY GAR 45'00 PORK SUPPLIES PARKS & 61'15 TOTAL FOR HAYARRE TRUE VALUE 124'38 Oi l 32241 OHONO, CITY OF JUNE ANIMAL CONTROL PROT INS 1,345-8I 3242 PAWS, LANS & HOOVES OOYES PET JUNE BOARDlNG/hAY lMPOUN PROT INS 580'77 23243 POMMER COMPANY, INC. ENGRAVING COUNCIL 28'78 23244 POTTS, KENNETH N. MAY PROSECUTIONS PROF SER 1,s08.33 23245 SAM'S CLUB ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE GEN GOVT I20'00 23246 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN CLAlR HOME PAGE CLASS GEN GOVT I29'00 23247 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY EQUIP MAlHT CITY GAR 239'62 23248 SO LK MTKA PUB SAFETY DEP JULY POLICE BUDGET POLICE P 39.237'94 23249 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC COUNCIL MTG MINUTES GEN GOVT 42I-7� PLAN COMM hTG MINUTES PLANNING I69'()0 TOTAL FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITE 59()'75 23250 TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUFP EQUIP MAlNT CITY GAR 5-24 23251 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC WATER TESTING WATER DE 20. 00 23252 US POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE FOR METER GEN GOVT 1,000.00 23253 IlEGLER. INC- EQUIP MAlMT CITY GAR I00'46 «** TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL 98,332'24 *** TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 234,744'97 Page 3 COMPUTER CHECKS MANUAL CHECKS NOTICES OF DEPOSIT *zw*TOTALSXZZ* 22255-6.5 „00 .00 22255.65 Page 4 C H E C K S T E IR CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME N i BL 'U.. AMOUN C: C6 1", 09 98 109 EMILY G BAS TYR 215027 17 - 14 C ( U ii -,l 09 98 110 CONNIE D, BAST YR. 213028 521.56 COM 6 09 98 115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN 21302• 1521.15 com 6 09 98 150 HEATHER A. BLECHTA 213030 118.69 cum 6 09 98 110 RYAN 0. BLECHh:t 215031 171 � 19 CON 6 09 9s 325 ANGELA M. COLE 213052 481.38 c 0 6 09 98 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 213033 865.27 li' cum 6 09 98 775 JAMES C. EAKINS 213034 671.57 cool 6 09 98 1160 TWILA R. GROUT 213055 531-015 6 09 9s 1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 213036 507.2 CON C 0 if"' 6 09 98 140o PATR It. :IA R, HELGESEN 213037 523.6-1 CON 6 09 98 1410 PANEL!; .3. HELLING 215058 535.46 CCIM 6 09 98 1430 KELLY M. HENTGES 213039 198.68 6 09 98 1550 JAMES C. HURM 213040 1721.90 CC?l c C`1 N 6 09 98 1601 BRIAN D. JAKEL 213041 132.52 CON 6 0? 98 1700 JEFFREY D. A. JENSEN JOHNSON 21 42 30 213043 1075.42 896.32 C C i 6 09 98 1800 DENNIS 98 .1.810 ERICA E. JOHNSON 213044 69. k CON !,-- 6 09 98 1950 MARTIN L. JONES 213045 80. 20 cum cum 6 09 98 •1✓0 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 213046 629.7 .5 cool 6 09 98 2495 MOLLY D. LATTERNER 213047 148. 5 CON 6 09 98 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 21•048 664.7.5 CON 6 09 98 2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOWSKI 213049 1005.25 CON 6 09 98 2SOS JASON R. LUND 213050 297.37 cum 6 09 9s 2900 RUSSELL R. M•RRON 213051 1= . cum 6 09 98 2910 BRADLEY j. MASON 213052 433. 5 CON 6 09 98 3000 THERESA L. NAAB 213053 610-12 cool 6 09 98 3100 LAWRENCE F" HICCUM 213054 1151-34 CON 6 09 98 3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN 213055 904, 9C CON 6 09 98 3500 JOSEPH E. PAZANDAK 213056 1110.1 CON 6 09 98 3580 CHRISTOPHER J. POUNDER 213057 978.56 CON 6 09 98 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 213058 1126.04 CON 6 09 98 3YO! BRIAN M. ROERICK 213059 56.58 CON 6 09 98 3800 ALAN j. ROLEK 213060 1150.63 cum 6 0• 98 3815 MICHAEL j. RUFFENACH 213061 CON 6 09 98 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 213062 462.09 CON 6 09 98 4050 BERNARD J. SCHNURR 213063 138.75 CON 6 09 98 4175 ANDREW R. SMITH 2i3064 79.19 CON 6 09 98 4200 BRENDA L. LUKE 213065 106-66 4575 REBECCA A- TARVIN 216066 153. 28 C ON 6 09 98 COMPUTER CHECKS MANUAL CHECKS NOTICES OF DEPOSIT *zw*TOTALSXZZ* 22255-6.5 „00 .00 22255.65 Page 4 4 Inflow and Infiltration Study for the CITY OF SHOREWOOD WSB Proj. No. 2010.00 May, 1998 Submitted to: City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard WSB Minneapolis, MN 55426 812 - 541 -4800 & Associates, Inc. FAX 541 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS , INFLOW / INFILTRATION STUDY FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN May, 1998 Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office Park 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 -1344 (612) 541 -4800 541 -1700 (Fax) City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. John R. Bradford, P.E. Date: June 15, 1998 Reg. No. 25927 Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Date: June 15, 1998 Reg. No. 19103 City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 SHOREWOOD INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION ................ ............................... Page 2. BACKGROUND DATA ........... ............................... Page 2 3. EXISTING SYSTEM .............. ............................... Page 2 4. WORK EFFORT ................. ............................... Page 2 5. UI REMOVAL STRATEGY ........ ............................... Page 5 6. COST EFFECTIVENESS .......... ............................... Page 6 7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... Page 7 City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 SHOREWOOD INFLOW/INFILTRATION STUDY INTRODUCTION On November 19, 1996, the City of Shorewood entered into a Grant Agreement with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (MCES) to evaluate the Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) of clear water into the sanitary sewer system. The grant is part of an ongoing MCES program to reduce the amount of I/I across the metro area. Inflow and Infiltration refers to water entering the sanitary sewer system from sources 1 other than service connections. The water is typically clear, that is, not requiring treatment. Inflow is runoff from rain events that drain directly into the sanitary sewer for such sources as storm sewer cross connections, foot drains, sump pumps, and open ' manholes. Infiltration refers to ground water that enters the sewer system through open pipe joints, leaking manhole walls and cracked or broken pipe. ' An inflow problem generally shows up as a dramatic spike in the sewer flow during and immediately after a rain event. The duration is generally short and the peak flow high. Oftentimes, inflow will result in short-term system backups that can flood basements and ' occasionally rise out of manholes. Infiltration is also highlighted during rain and snow melt events, however, the rise in flow ' is delayed and flow rates can remain elevated for quite some time. The delay in rising flow rates is due to the time required for rainwater to filter through the ground to the sanitary sewer. This filtering both reduces the peaks and prolongs the duration of the ' high flows. Left unchecked, I/I costs communities money for a number of reasons. First, treating water that is already clean costs a city in chemical addition and electrical costs. The dilution of the wastewater reduces the efficiency of the treatment process making it more difficult to meet pollutant elimination regulations. Second, treatment plants and sanitary ' sewers must be made larger to handle the peak flows that can surge to the treatment plant after runoff events. As an example, a community with a large I/I problem may need to construct a treatment plant able to handle a flow rate of 5 million gallons per day (MGD) ' as compared to perhaps only 2.5 MGD if a low level of I/I was present. This is a significant difference in capital expenditures. This report outlines the City of Shorewood's existing sanitary sewer system, the work effort currently underway in regards to I/I detection and elimination, and the ' recommended future steps tended to further reduce I/I levels. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 1 C F 2. BACKGROUND DATA In preparing this report, we utilized all portions of the following data sources. Shorewood Infiltration/Inflow Analysis 1982 MCES Flow Meter Data 1996 —1998 1998 Manhole Inspection Reports Television Inspection Reports In addition to the above - referenced sources, discussions with City Staff and MCES personnel were instrumental in completing this report. 3. EXISTING SYSTEM The Shorewood sanitary sewer system was constructed primarily in 1972. Sewer lines have been added to serve additional subdivisions as they developed. The system consists of approximately 250,000 lineal feet of gravity sewer and 19 lift stations. MCES meters the flow and provides treatment, billing the City based on the amount of flow generated each month. Flow metering in Shorewood is very complex. The MCES has a trunk sewer running through the City, and all of the surrounding municipalities have one or more connections to it. Because there are so many communities that have flow passing through the City, it has become impractical for MCES to monitor every gallon of wastewater that enters and exists in the City. MCES uses a combination of meters and area estimations to calculate the amount of flow generated by the City. Without complete flow metering, it is not possible to quantify the exact amount of UI entering the sewer system. The magnitude of the M component, however, can be identified from the partial metering. Because most of the system was constructed at the same time, we have assumed that the meter data is representative of what is happening in the remainder of the City. 4. WORK EFFORT A. Review of Flow Records Flow records from the MCES were reviewed in an effort to determine the quantity and type of clear water entering the sanitary sewer system. A summary of the data collected appears in the Appendix of this report. It is important to note that this data does not represent the total sewer flow allocated to Shorewood. There are areas outside of Shorewood that are included in the flow and areas within the City that do not flow through these meters. The attached Figure 1 shows the metered and un- metered areas in town. The most information we can glean from this data is whether or not there is an I/I problem and a rough measure of the magnitude of the problem. Figure 2 shows the daily total flow and a 70 -day average flow over a two -year period based on 6 meters. The "70 day average" was developed by CH2MHill in City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study 1 WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 2 M Com. My Boundary F/71 Roaft And Highways 250 Raikoads ZO MCES Inte rceptors Accessed By This Community Other MCES Interceptors a ) MCES Lift Station mers mew station MCES Ilrembnent Plant ED Ungervad Aron ED I.Mmatered Aram DemAeven t I Orono At- 7onks 5 41m 417 M 424 hIffinneAwks M416 $253.327 viclWis IT 1 4W : JF '�N AW I& law 350 Weshvood Lake Office soon Minneapolis, MN 55426 WSB """" MCES Sewer Map 612-54148M & Associates, 112c. FAX 541-1 Shorewood, MN INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS L Chanhassen --Ohl #L An City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 CITY OF SHORRWOOD FIGURE 1 Shorewood Summary MCES Metered Flow 3.00 2.50 M o A G7 0 1.50 w A 1.00 0.50 0.00 N� 9� 504C)b 0 FO o co c) c Daily Total 70 -Day Avg Figure 2 Meter Summary 1 6/16/1998 the 1992 1/1 Evaluation for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Because of seasonal changes in average flow, a 70 -day average is used rather than an average for the entire study period. The 70 -day average flow represents the ' average daily flow for the 35 days before and after the plotted date. The 70 -day average contains an algorithm to screen out peak days which may skew the average. The screening algorithm removes days in which the flow was greater ' than the 95' percentile of daily flow for the period January 1996 through December 1997. L� �I The peak flow peaking factor is obtained by dividing the daily flow by the 70 -day average. The daily peaking factors have been as high as 3 times the average flow. Below is a compilation of the 10 highest peaks in the previous two years. The instantaneous peak factor is computed by comparing 6 flow meters. Actual instant peak factor will be higher because the meters did not peak at the same time of day. 5- Sep -96 3.06 3.19 1- Aug -96 3.03 3.33 4- Jan -96 3.01 3.12 4- Dec -97 2.90 2.54 10- Jul -97 2.87 3.25 6- Nov -97 2.81 3.19 11- Jun -97 2.71 2.94 3- Jan -97 2.66 4.00 6- Sep -96 2.57 3.82 7- Nov -97 2.57 3.95 In looking at the data, the peaks generally lasted 2 or more days. This trend is an indication of the infiltration component discussed earlier. The very high instantaneous peaks in relation to many of the daily peaks is an indication of the inflow component of the system I/I. From the flow meter data, approximately 109 million gallons (MG) of clear water entered the sewer system for the 2 -year period analyzed. Total metered flow for this period was 638 MG. Approximately 22% of the total metered flow is I/I based. Extrapolated across the entire system, approximately 74 MG of I/I enter the system annually. MCES bills the City $1,370 per MG for sewage treatment. The VI costs are then approximately $101,000 annually. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 3 1 E Figure 3 shows monthly total flows plotted against monthly rainfall. There appears to be a definitive elevation of sewer flows beginning with the snow melt runoff in February 1996 and in March 1997 and continuing through the summer months. This trend is another indication of the infiltration entering the system. B. Manhole Inventory In an effort to identify and reduce sources of 1/I, the City of Shorewood completed the inspection of approximately 830 manholes in the sanitary sewer system. The manhole deficiencies were classified and identified by the type of problem. Categories included: • Unable to Locate • Buried • Needs Grout Repair • Inflow Observed • Infiltration Observed • Debris in Manhole • Flushing Required • Raise, Lower or Replace Casting • Casting Shifted • Vented Casting • Immediate Attention Required. City staff completed the inspections during the 1997 -1998 winter and the inspection reports were analyzed immediately. For Inflow/Infiltration identification, the categories of greatest concern were "Grout Repair" and "Inflow and Infiltration Observed ". Of the 830 manholes inspected, 160 had infiltration observed through castings or joints,125 needed grouting repair, and 18 were in bad enough condition to require immediate attention. A full summary of the inventory is included in the Appendix. The manhole inspection data provides a base of information that the City can use to track the condition of manholes and monitor rehabilitation efforts. The City will continue to inspect manholes annually using a goal of examining 10% of the system each year. C. Sump Pump Removal Program Approximately two years ago, the City of Shorewood completed an extensive sump pump discharge removal program. The program was generally successful and it is anticipated that there are very few, if any, sump pumps that are still connected to the sanitary sewer system. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 4 . O w O O i•r O cn ,f° N i 3 •� cd Y. I I gluoW aad sagaui C) 00 110 ,�T N O O p O O O O C O M C N N .-, q;uoN .iad suopeg uoitiiW a� s. aA w a �6, P °o J ILGI �G� S C6l � �6 < 6'. � Qa� 6.� 9 a 9 6. �o J 9 9 j �b� 96, �T P' 9 9 C' 90 6 L1, D. TV Inspections The City has contracted with Visu -Sewer Clean and Seal, Inc. for the televising ' of approximately 30,000 lineal feet of sanitary sewer during the spring/summer of 1998. City staff identified Enchanted Island as a priority area and the manhole inspections indicated the Deephaven area may also be a source of infiltration. Summer is not normally the best time for observing infiltration, however, the areas chosen for inspection are subject to year - around infiltration due to the high groundwater table. The majority of the pipes to be televised were constructed below the normal groundwater level. This work is currently underway and the findings will be appended to this report when they are completed in July. 5. I/I REMOVAL STRATEGY Removing additional 1/1 from the sanitary sewer system requires a continuing program of inspections, maintenance, and repairs. The sanitary sewer system is no different than other infrastructure types. As with streets, every year the condition of the sewer system degrades. Cracks form, joints leak and infiltration increases. If the existing system is left alone, it will only continue to deteriorate and become worse. An annual maintenance program similar to street seal coating should be considered for the sanitary sewer system to monitor this degradation. These programs are often called annual I/I reduction programs. An annual I/I reduction program is simple in concept. Each year, inspect 10% of the sanitary sewer system. Based on these inspections, determine the repairs needed to eliminate the I/I from the area and perform the work. Typical inspections include televising lines, smoke testing and manhole inspections. Typical repair contracts will include pressure grouting pipe and manholes, slip lining pipe, structural lining of manholes and installation of chimney seals on manhole adjusting rings. Of particular importance is the last item, installation of chimney seals. Because of the freeze thaw cycles in Minnesota, the adjusting rings (the area between the cast iron from and the precast manhole wall) are especially susceptible to cracks and I/I. Typically, the joints between the rings, frame and manhole wall are made of mortar which does not have a great deal of flexibility. During freeze /thaw cycles, the castings move up and down with the roadway, cracking the mortar joints and opening an M pathway. "Chimney seals" are one type of flexible rubber gasket that can be installed around the inside or outside of the manhole. They flex with the ground during freeze /thaw cycles and remain watertight. There are several types of these flexible products available to address the variable conditions and uses in a collection system. With a base annual I/I reduction program of 10% of the sewer system, an anticipated scope of inspection and repair is given below. A portion of the "Clean Sanitary Sewer" (Item B) is currently done under an annual contract with Visu -Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 5 Inspections Manhole Clean & Televise Pipe Repairs Minor Manhole Repair (20 %) Major Manhole Repair ( %) Sewer Lining (5 %) Sewer Spot Repair (1 %) 150 Each City Staff $0 30,000 LF $0.80 $24,000 30 Each $200.00 $6,000 8 Each $2,500.00 $20,000 1,500 LF $10.00 $15,000 300 LF $40.00 $12,000 Subtotal $77,000 Conti ( 10 %) $7,700 Total Project Cost $84,700 6. COST EFFECTIVENESS It is important to consider the cost effectiveness of the annual program described above. 1/I reduction programs have a large spread in their effectiveness in reducing sewer flows. Some very successful programs have significantly reduced the amount of III in the sewer systems. However, it is also common for there to be very little actual reduction in sewer flows. That is not to say these program were not successful, just that all of the potential I/I sources could not be immediately identified and rehabilitated. The I/I defects that are rehabilitated will reduce treatment costs, but additional previously - unidentified sources may become active, suggesting that the removal was not completely effective. Infiltration, as opposed to inflow, is very difficult to remove because the groundwater can enter any crack in manholes, sewer pipe, joints and service lines. When one crack is repaired, the water may enter through another one further upstream. Each repair makes it more difficult for water to enter, but it is impossible to completely eliminate all infiltration. On the other hand, if nothing is done in terms of maintenance and repair, the pipe and manholes will continue to deteriorate, increasing the amount of groundwater entering the system. So, while the volume of I/I may or may not decrease with annual maintenance, I/I certainly will not increase as quickly as if nothing had been done. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 6 Therefore, while a definitive answer to the question of how much I/I will be removed from the sewer system cannot be answered, the cost effectiveness of both the annual maintenance and sump pump removal programs are inherent. The existing 22% 1/I rate ' in Shorewood is high and the annual program should reduce that rate. The annual maintenance program is needed as much for future I/I prevention as it is for current 1/I reduction. No M reduction program will eliminate all of the clear water from the sewer system. However, I/I is currently costing the City approximately $101,000 per year and a reduction effort may be warranted. 7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study as presented in this report are summarized below. A. The City of Shorewood has an existing sanitary sewer system made up of approximately 250,000 lineal feet of gravity sewer, 1,361 manholes and 19 lift stations. B. The sanitary sewer system is subjected to substantial peak flows from both inflow and infiltration sources. The treatment costs of the clear water is estimated at approximately $101,000 annually. C. The likely infiltration sources include cracked and /or leaking manholes, open pipe joints and broken pipe. D. The City has inspected 830 manholes this spring, finding 160 with visible infiltration, 125 in need of grout repair and 18 requiring immediate attention. E. The City is currently televising approximately 30,000 feet of sanitary sewer. The findings of this investigation will be appended to this report when completed. F. It is recommended that the City continue their I/1 reduction effort with an annual program to reduce both inflow and infiltration sources. G. The second tier recommended is to begin an annual I/I Reduction Program to inspect and repair approximately 10% of the sanitary sewer system each year. The preliminary anticipated annual cost ofthe program is approximately $87,000. H. It is recommended that a flexible sealing product be used to seal the adjustment ring area be installed on every manhole where street reconstruction or pavement overlay projects take place. City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 7 L APPENDIX City of Shorewood Inflow/Infiltration Study ' WSB Project No. 2010.00 Page 8 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow= M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) UI Peak Factor O1 -Jan-96 1,628 68 300 63 151 214 0.83 0.91 02 -Jan-96 1,625 61 344 71 142 194 0.81 0.92 03 -Jan-96 1,704 57 364 67 131 187 0.90 0.93 04 -Jan-96 3,556 57 322 67 129 186 2.79 0.93 3.01 05 -Jan-96 2,858 57 271 72 129 192 2.14 0.93 2.30 06 -Jan-96 1,370 62 317 72 136 213 0.57 0.93 07 -Jan-96 1,396 67 377 59 148 224 0.52 0.94 08 -Jan-96 1,480 60 357 66 133 218 0.65 0.94 09 -Jan-96 1,713 58 337 70 128 277 0.84 0.94 10 -Jan-96 1,518 59 313 65 127 265 0.69 0.95 11 -Jan-96 1,506 57 304 64 135 265 0.68 0.95 12 -Jan-96 1,467 54 350 70 137 265 0.59 0.96 13 -Jan-96 1,547 67 227 76 162 215 0.80 0.96 14 -Jan-96 1,570 63 225 66 151 221 0.84 0.97 15 -Jan-96 1,545 60 224 66 135 211 0.85 0.97 16 -Jan-96 1,448 58 234 68 124 208 0.76 0.97 17 -Jan-96 1,571 65 258 64 130 237 0.82 0.97 18 -Jan-96 1,682 65 277 64 228 308 0.74 0.97 19 -Jan-96 1,697 66 219 66 153 265 0.93 0.97 20 -Jan-96 1,766 62 231 69 142 265 1.00 0.97 21 -Jan-96 1,789 62 251 70 142 270 0.99 0.98 22 -Jan-96 1,722 58 242 70 142 259 0.95 0.98 23 -Jan-96 1,791 52 256 69 142 274 1.00 0.98 24 -Jan-96 1,812 55 277 62 142 270 1.01 0.98 25 -Jan-96 1,862 56 255 64 142 275 1.07 0.99 26 -Jan-96 1,957 52 244 65 142 185 1.27 0.98 27 -Jan-96 2,057 63 274 71 142 201 1.31 0.98 28 -Jan-96 2,056 62 285 61 142 214 1.29 0.98 29 -Jan-96 1,951 56 258 68 142 191 1.24 0.98 30 -Jan-96 1,756 56 257 62 142 188 1.05 0.98 31 -Jan-96 1,773 53 232 67 142 192 1.09 0.98 O1- Feb -96 3,078 52 218 59 153 187 2.41 0.98 2.45 02- Feb -96 2,851 58 235 69 153 198 2.14 0.99 2.17 03- Feb -96 2,348 63 253 71 153 210 1.60 0.99 1.62 04- Feb -96 2,264 64 287 66 153 217 1.48 0.98 1.50 05- Feb -96 1,984 54 268 70 153 205 1.23 0.99 06- Feb -96 1,884 54 247 67 153 192 1.17 0.99 07- Feb -96 1,947 56 257 69 153 210 1.20 0.99 08- Feb -96 2,246 54 274 71 153 207 1.49 1.00 1.49 09- Feb -96 2,126 53 267 70 153 206 1.38 1.00 1.38 10- Feb -96 2,235 59 283 75 153 220 1.45 1.00 1.44 11- Feb -96 2,000 66 290 70 153 221 1.20 1.01 12- Feb -96 1,868 54 301 71 153 204 1.08 1.02 13- Feb -96 1,844 53 327 68 153 202 1.04 1.02 14- Feb -96 1,927 57 337 69 153 206 1.10 1.03 15- Feb -96 1,936 55 282 64 153 202 1.18 1.03 16- Feb -96 1,826 56 258 72 153 197 1.09 1.04 17- Feb -96 1,831 62 283 74 153 208 1.05 1.04 Meter Summary 1 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) III Peak Factor 18- Feb -96 1,995 66 278 64 153 210 1.22 1.05 19- Feb -96 2,011 59 284 68 153 209 1.24 1.05 20- Feb -96 1,814 57 292 67 153 204 1.04 1.05 21- Feb -96 1,721 56 294 65 169 200 0.94 1.05 22- Feb -96 1,624 58 297 70 145 205 0.85 1.06 23- Feb -96 1,799 63 334 69 223 232 0.88 1.06 24- Feb -96 2,273 72 364 76 267 249 1.24 1.06 25- Feb -96 2,112 82 383 71 196 249 1.13 1.06 26- Feb -96 1,866 72 373 78 147 219 0.98 1.07 27- Feb -96 2,016 58 391 71 135 214 1.15 1.07 28- Feb -96 1,931 61 414 68 135 205 1.05 1.07 29- Feb -96 1,970 56 380 67 133 206 1.13 1.07 O1- Mar -96 1,766 56 357 74 139 202 0.94 1.07 02- Mar -96 1,728 65 304 83 143 219 0.91 1.07 03- Mar -96 1,760 65 304 78 143 221 0.95 1.06 04- Mar -96 1,751 58 304 68 131 200 0.99 1.06 05- Mar -96 1,751 53 304 65 125 192 1.01 1.06 06- Mar -96 1,751 54 304 69 127 194 1.00 1.06 07- Mar -96 1,751 56 304 70 130 196 1.00 1.06 08- Mar -96 1,751 51 268 68 126 195 1.04 1.06 09- Mar -96 1,751 63 287 77 134 205 0.99 1.06 10- Mar -96 1,727 63 291 76 144 218 0.94 1.06 11- Mar -96 1,763 63 293 69 151 222 0.96 1.06 12- Mar -96 2,056 74 355 76 212 282 1.06 1.06 13- Mar -96 2,291 78 395 84 313 312 1.11 1.05 14- Mar -96 2,070 71 348 82 203 287 1.08 1.05 15- Mar -96 2,047 65 345 85 197 278 1.08 1.05 16- Mar -96 2,126 76 363 84 214 296 1.09 1.05 17- Mar -96 2,109 73 361 77 210 296 1.09 1.05 18- Mar -96 1,979 63 338 80 186 266 1.05 1.05 19- Mar -96 1,911 61 318 75 176 247 1.03 1.05 20- Mar -96 1,896 63 323 75 167 240 1.03 1.05 21- Mar -96 1,864 62 301 76 163 242 1.02 1.04 22- Mar -96 1,853 62 293 75 162 236 1.03 1.04 23- Mar -96 1,882 65 301 77 173 247 1.02 1.04 24- Mar -96 1,857 65 280 72 174 253 1.01 1.04 25- Mar -96 1,785 62 292 70 160 237 0.96 1.03 26- Mar -96 1,745 59 319 68 147 223 0.93 1.03 27- Mar -96 1,782 55 329 77 150 238 0.93 1.03 28- Mar -96 1,826 58 298 76 166 244 0.98 1.03 29- Mar -96 1,945 63 317 84 181 265 1.03 1.04 30- Mar -96 2,141 74 304 100 208 307 1.15 1.03 31- Mar -96 2,139 77 304 85 211 305 1.16 1.03 O1- Apr -96 2,067 68 304 83 198 284 1.13 1.03 02- Apr -96 2,134 72 304 91 202 294 1.17 1.03 03- Apr -96 2,101 72 304 84 197 295 1.15 1.03 04- Apr -96 1,997 65 304 81 186 276 1.08 1.03 05- Apr -96 2,030 66 304 90 192 282 1.10 1.03 Meter Summary 2 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) nFlow 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 06- Apr -96 2,093 76 304 92 200 282 1.14 1.03 07- Apr -96 2,026 74 304 83 195 282 1.09 1.03 08- Apr -96 2,018 68 304 87 191 282 1.08 1.03 09- Apr -96 2,011 65 304 88 185 282 1.09 1.03 10- Apr -96 2,003 69 304 90 189 282 1.07 1.03 11- Apr -96 2,044 73 304 93 191 282 1.10 1.04 12- Apr -96 1,996 67 303 97 191 282 1.06 1.04 13- Apr -96 2,011 72 316 97 198 289 1.04 1.04 14- Apr -96 2,015 72 333 90 202 287 1.03 1.04 15- Apr -96 1,983 67 335 89 191 277 1.02 1.04 16- Apr -96 1,929 62 348 90 181 269 0.98 1.04 17- Apr -96 1,942 64 360 89 185 278 0.97 1.04 18- Apr -96 1,968 66 326 88 189 301 1.00 1.04 19- Apr -96 1,966 66 273 92 183 285 1.07 1.04 20- Apr -96 2,004 73 281 96 195 294 1.06 1.04 21- Apr -96 1,971 71 286 87 191 294 1.04 1.04 22- Apr -96 1,908 61 298 88 176 262 1.02 1.03 23- Apr -96 1,888 62 330 84 173 260 0.98 1.03 24- Apr -96 1,898 68 334 88 178 262 0.97 1.03 25- Apr -96 1,911 64 314 89 176 286 0.98 1.03 26- Apr -96 1,865 61 264 89 167 285 1.00 1.03 27- Apr -96 1,911 70 269 87 180 295 1.01 1.03 28- Apr -96 1,939 69 287 80 188 298 1.02 1.03 29- Apr -96 1,875 60 299 86 163 270 1.00 1.03 30- Apr -96 1,854 60 351 80 164 268 0.93 1.03 01- May -96 1,846 62 333 79 160 264 0.95 1.03 02- May -96 1,863 63 293 83 168 286 0.97 1.03 03- May -96 1,939 71 271 86 173 314 1.02 1.03 04- May -96 1,940 74 298 92 180 298 1.00 1.03 05- May -96 2,054 77 304 90 201 338 1.04 1.02 06- May -96 1,967 67 304 84 171 307 1.03 1.02 07- May -96 1,897 62 304 84 166 300 0.98 1.02 08- May -96 1,898 66 304 85 177 299 0.97 1.01 09- May -96 1,905 65 284 88 174 292 1.00 1.01 10- May -96 1,977 64 306 101 187 301 1.02 1.00 II- May -96 2,004 69 304 100 193 299 1.04 1.00 12- May -96 1,967 72 304 91 192 280 1.03 1.00 13- May -96 1,946 65 304 90 182 267 1.04 0.99 14- May -96 2,022 64 304 90 193 284 1.09 1.00 15- May -96 2,022 67 304 92 189 283 1.09 1.00 16- May -96 1,986 67 304 88 183 268 1.08 1.00 17- May -96 1,994 71 319 93 183 268 1.06 1.00 18- May -96 2,051 78 336 103 201 287 1.05 1.00 19- May -96 2,974 120 565 164 355 496 1.27 1.01 20- May -96 2,471 93 468 129 304 385 1.09 1.01 21- May -96 2,274 84 462 114 274 338 1.00 1.01 22- May -96 2,191 83 453 114 252 317 0.97 1.01 23- May -96 2,113 77 376 108 241 304 1.01 1.01 Meter Summary 3 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) UI Peak Factor 24- May -96 2,055 73 301 101 212 293 1.08 1.01 25- May -96 2,024 77 292 96 263 298 1.00 1.01 26- May -96 1,987 76 295 90 286 296 0.94 1.01 27- May -96 2,045 76 304 84 294 309 0.98 1.00 28- May -96 1,986 72 304 85 284 291 0.95 1.00 29- May -96 1,949 68 304 88 261 282 0.95 1.00 30- May -96 1,906 68 304 83 216 278 0.96 1.00 31- May -96 1,882 66 286 91 172 254 1.01 1.00 01- Jun -96 2,036 73 316 93 179 271 1.10 0.99 02- Jun -96 1,953 71 304 84 189 279 1.03 0.99 03- Jun -96 1,885 62 304 83 172 263 1.00 0.99 04- Jun -96 1,791 61 304 82 170 281 0.89 0.99 05- Jun -96 1,768 63 304 80 170 252 0.90 0.99 06- Jun -96 1,817 64 304 87 165 256 0.94 0.98 07- Jun -96 1,775 64 249 88 163 247 0.96 0.98 08- Jun -96 1,825 72 266 102 170 262 0.95 0.98 09- Jun -96 1,764 71 280 91 169 262 0.89 0.97 10- Jun -96 1,725 67 304 85 161 246 0.86 0.97 11- Jun -96 1,648 64 304 87 155 239 0.80 0.97 12- Jun -96 1,631 68 304 84 151 238 0.79 0.96 13- Jun -96 1,619 64 317 93 151 240 0.75 0.96 14- Jun -96 1,615 65 243 95 147 247 0.82 0.96 15- Jun -96 1,703 66 247 112 155 246 0.88 0.95 16- Jun -96 1,822 69 267 90 171 286 0.94 0.95 17- Jun -96 2,584 87 406 113 243 392 1.34 0.95 1.42 18- Jun -96 2,314 72 389 98 206 365 1.18 0.94 19- Jun -96 2,168 71 322 98 194 318 1.17 0.93 20- Jun -96 2,105 68 322 100 183 306 1.13 0.93 21- Jun -96 2,423 84 324 124 233 336 1.32 0.92 22- Jun -96 2,322 85 303 119 219 333 1.26 0.92 23- Jun -96 2,213 80 292 106 210 319 1.20 0.91 24- Jun -96 2,108 72 290 102 196 306 1.14 0.91 25- Jun -96 2,004 71 314 94 189 298 1.04 0.91 26- Jun -96 2,000 71 304 99 184 294 1.05 0.90 27- Jun -96 1,948 71 304 101 182 276 1.01 0.90 28- Jun -96 1,878 71 288 99 170 265 0.98 0.90 29- Jun -96 1,877 78 307 106 176 269 0.94 0.89 30- Jun -96 1,802 74 304 89 165 268 0.90 0.89 01- Jul -96 1,787 66 304 89 159 253 0.92 0.89 02- Jul -96 1,727 66 304 91 156 250 0.86 0.89 03- Jul -96 1,690 62 304 91 146 251 0.84 0.88 04- Jul -96 1,708 72 304 106 149 267 0.81 0.88 05- Jul -96 1,665 68 304 97 150 262 0.78 0.88 06- Jul -96 1,630 65 235 93 146 258 0.83 0.87 07- Jul -96 1,684 69 234 91 157 254 0.88 0.87 08- Jul -96 1,685 63 259 90 148 237 0.89 0.86 09- Jul -96 1,592 59 256 90 141 225 0.82 0.86 10- Jul -96 1,598 65 282 95 140 221 0.80 0.86 Meter Summary 4 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) 1/1 Peak Factor 11- Jul -96 1,601 62 258 89 147 247 0.80 0.85 12- Jul -96 1,600 61 244 91 139 253 0.81 0.85 13- Jul -96 1,652 72 253 94 146 251 0.84 0.84 14- Jul -96 1,648 64 276 86 146 247 0.83 0.84 15- Jul -96 1,645 64 294 90 142 248 0.81 0.84 16- Jul -96 1,582 62 317 85 139 228 0.75 0.83 17- Jul -96 1,577 67 353 84 141 228 0.70 0.83 18- Jul -96 1,577 67 344 85 132 219 0.73 0.83 19- Jul -96 1,566 61 261 82 130 211 0.82 0.83 20- Jul -96 1,582 65 271 92 142 220 0.79 0.82 21- Jul -96 1,576 65 308 79 142 220 0.76 0.82 22- Jul -96 1,537 59 304 84 140 214 0.74 0.82 23- Jul -96 1,491 57 304 80 136 206 0.71 0.81 24- Jul -96 1,505 58 304 89 126 200 0.73 0.80 25- Jul -96 1,491 58 304 84 130 218 0.70 0.79 26- Jul -96 1,477 62 211 85 128 215 0.78 0.78 27- Jul -96 1,500 63 236 87 128 212 0.77 0.77 28- Jul -96 1,533 60 227 89 133 220 0.80 0.76 29- Jul -96 1,520 55 234 80 130 232 0.79 0.76 30- Jul -96 1,466 56 264 77 129 240 0.70 0.75 31- Jul -96 1,466 59 262 76 129 240 0.70 0.75 01- Aug -96 2,950 57 234 80 125 204 2.25 0.74 3.03 02- Aug -96 2,432 61 210 83 122 202 1.76 0.74 2.37 03- Aug -96 1,468 66 214 83 126 210 0.77 0.73 04- Aug -96 1,517 64 236 78 132 213 0.79 0.73 05- Aug -96 1,582 63 291 87 128 221 0.79 0.73 06- Aug -96 1,528 60 295 90 122 211 0.75 0.72 07- Aug -96 1,542 60 290 90 123 216 0.76 0.72 08- Aug -96 1,422 57 238 84 124 192 0.73 0.71 09- Aug -96 1,424 61 232 92 122 193 0.73 0.71 10- Aug -96 1,455 62 251 84 129 201 0.73 0.71 11- Aug -96 1,471 66 276 81 128 205 0.71 0.70 12- Aug -96 1,444 57 267 79 123 196 0.72 0.70 13- Aug -96 1,426 59 254 81 125 190 0.72 0.70 14- Aug -96 1,412 57 265 80 119 185 0.71 15- Aug -96 1,373 58 281 78 117 194 0.64 0.69 16- Aug -96 1,371 54 270 81 118 211 0.64 0.69 17- Aug -96 1,386 60 278 85 123 216 0.62 0.69 18- Aug -96 1,424 64 274 79 128 209 0.67 0.68 19- Aug -96 1,410 55 281 76 123 200 0.68 0.68 20- Aug -96 1,368 54 268 82 116 188 0.66 0.68 21- Aug -96 1,398 58 262 82 115 187 0.69 0.68 22- Aug -96 1,423 56 262 76 113 222 0.69 0.68 23- Aug -96 1,333 55 277 83 115 200 0.60 0.68 24- Aug -96 1,437 61 296 92 119 210 0.66 0.67 25- Aug -96 1,449 63 310 78 118 212 0.67 0.67 26- Aug -96 1,399 57 317 74 116 203 0.63 0.67 27- Aug -96 1,348 57 304 75 109 187 0.62 0.67 Meter Summary 5 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 ' Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date M415 (1000 gpd) M416 (1000 gpd) Corrected Meter Readings M417 M417A (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) M419 (1000 gpd) M420 (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) UI Peak Factor 28- Aug -96 1,331 54 304 74 115 187 0.60 0.67 29- Aug -96 1,331 53 304 76 112 172 0.61 0.67 30- Aug -96 1,329 59 283 80 106 173 0.63 0.67 31- Aug -96 1,343 62 306 78 114 180 0.60 0.66 01- Sep -96 1,305 57 322 78 109 179 0.56 0.66 02- Sep -96 1,541 69 304 78 136 208 0.75 0.66 03- Sep -96 1,421 55 304 81 118 185 0.68 0.66 04- Sep -96 1,374 57 304 77 117 179 0.64 0.66 05- Sep -96 2,713 53 304 75 107 170 2.00 0.65 3.06 06- Sep -96 2,348 56 247 85 111 167 1.68 0.65 2.57 07- Sep -96 1,397 56 281 90 124 199 0.65 0.65 08- Sep -96 1,455 63 293 73 129 199 0.70 0.65 09- Sep -96 1,378 53 331 77 115 199 0.60 0.65 10- Sep -96 1,335 52 333 84 105 199 0.56 0.64 11- Sep -96 1,306 50 353 74 104 199 0.53 0.64 12- Sep -96 1,284 51 331 70 104 199 0.53 0.64 13- Sep -96 1,275 51 282 71 104 143 0.62 0.64 14- Sep -96 1,320 61 313 78 114 149 0.60 0.64 15- Sep -96 1,401 59 304 71 124 170 0.67 0.64 16- Sep -96 1,308 55 304 64 110 153 0.62 0.63 17- Sep -96 1,278 50 304 71 104 150 0.60 0.63 18- Sep -96 1,280 52 304 65 106 151 0.60 0.64 19- Sep -96 1,264 53 304 67 101 148 0.59 0.64 20- Sep -96 1,321 54 267 69 116 152 0.66 0.64 21- Sep -96 1,410 62 306 75 119 171 0.68 0.64 22- Sep -96 1,469 64 304 81 125 181 0.71 0.64 23- Sep -96 1,397 52 304 76 116 169 0.68 0.64 24- Sep -96 1,334 50 304 67 110 160 0.64 0.64 25- Sep -96 1,283 51 304 64 105 160 0.60 0.64 26- Sep -96 1,344 52 304 69 109 163 0.65 0.64 27- Sep -96 1,338 50 250 68 111 166 0.69 0.64 28- Sep -96 1,401 58 286 73 116 172 0.70 0.64 29- Sep -96 1,472 60 296 72 126 188 0.73 0.64 30- Sep -96 1,370 52 304 70 116 171 0.66 0.64 01- Oct -96 1,333 49 304 73 108 174 0.63 0.64 02- Oct -96 1,301 47 304 70 107 176 0.60 0.64 03- Oct -96 1,307 51 304 82 113 181 0.58 0.64 04- Oct -96 1,276 50 239 71 110 177 0.63 0.65 05- Oct -96 1,349 53 255 76 115 157 0.69 0.65 06- Oct -96 1,410 58 300 73 125 166 0.69 0.65 07- Oct -96 1,343 50 333 71 119 172 0.60 0.65 08- Oct -96 1,270 50 304 66 111 188 0.55 0.65 09- Oct -96 1,314 53 304 67 109 185 0.60 0.65 10- Oct -96 1,269 53 304 72 102 180 0.56 0.65 11- Oct -96 1,253 51 239 79 107 142 0.63 0.65 12- Oct -96 1,329 61 266 88 118 153 0.64 0.66 13- Oct -96 1,352 56 290 76 114 167 0.65 0.66 14- Oct -96 1,281 50 288 69 104 155 0.61 0.67 Meter Summary 6 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date M415 (1000 gpd) M416 (1000 gpd) Corrected Meter Readings M417 M417A (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) M419 (1000 gpd) M420 (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 15- Oct -96 1,247 50 304 69 104 151 0.57 0.67 16- Oct -96 1,250 54 304 66 105 156 0.56 0.67 17- Oct -96 1,470 59 304 79 125 222 0.68 0.68 18- Oct -96 1,389 50 304 73 111 183 0.67 0.68 19- Oct -96 1,309 51 304 71 126 180 0.58 0.68 20- Oct -96 1,329 62 304 69 129 187 0.58 0.68 21- Oct -96 1,348 47 304 71 124 163 0.64 0.69 22- Oct -96 1,368 52 262 69 108 161 0.72 0.69 23- Oct -96 1,469 56 296 76 118 196 0.73 0.69 24- Oct -96 1,374 53 253 69 115 194 0.69 0.69 25- Oct -96 1,330 52 254 72 112 178 0.66 0.69 26- Oct -96 1,430 57 281 76 128 188 0.70 0.70 27- Oct -96 1,458 64 295 70 129 199 0.70 0.70 28- Oct -96 1,376 52 283 66 122 210 0.64 0.70 29- Oct -96 1,568 59 368 80 138 260 0.66 0.70 30- Oct -96 1,600 57 375 80 141 223 0.72 0.70 31- Oct -96 1,418 55 334 66 127 195 0.64 0.69 O1- Nov -96 1,400 53 277 68 126 186 0.69 0.69 02- Nov -96 1,489 63 304 73 139 195 0.72 0.69 03- Nov -96 1,483 59 304 69 141 192 0.72 0.69 04- Nov -96 1,444 49 304 68 129 187 0.71 0.69 05- Nov -96 1,397 51 304 65 123 180 0.67 0.69 06- Nov -96 1,438 60 304 68 125 179 0.70 0.68 07- Nov -96 1,421 56 304 64 123 171 0.70 0.68 08- Nov -96 1,370 54 232 67 118 171 0.73 0.68 09- Nov -96 1,463 62 235 70 130 190 0.78 0.68 10- Nov -96 1,478 59 234 68 133 203 0.78 0.68 11- Nov -96 1,409 50 242 77 124 214 0.70 0.68 12- Nov -96 1,336 55 243 72 117 180 0.67 0.68 13- Nov -96 1,319 55 252 62 120 206 0.62 0.69 14- Nov -96 1,315 57 269 63 120 209 0.60 0.69 15- Nov -96 1,375 58 306 67 129 173 0.64 0.69 16- Nov -96 2,756 107 641 121 278 360 1.25 0.69 17- Nov -96 2,473 87 548 103 249 370 1.12 0.69 18- Nov -96 1,816 60 440 84 181 264 0.79 0.69 19- Nov -96 1,666 56 304 81 162 237 0.83 0.69 20- Nov -96 1,576 57 304 84 156 222 0.75 0.69 21- Nov -96 1,547 61 309 78 149 223 0.73 0.69 22- Nov -96 1,497 56 264 74 145 204 0.75 0.69 23- Nov -96 1,616 71 290 77 160 215 0.80 0.70 24- Nov -96 1,669 76 307 72 164 226 0.82 0.70 25- Nov -96 1,556 61 303 68 145 206 0.77 0.70 26- Nov -96 1,489 57 288 76 144 194 0.73 0.70 27- Nov -96 1,501 59 283 90 143 198 0.73 0.70 28- Nov -96 1,564 59 267 80 155 213 0.79 0.70 29- Nov -96 1,503 61 263 84 149 197 0.75 0.70 30- Nov -96 1,593 64 294 79 157 213 0.79 0.70 O1- Dec -96 1,629 69 328 68 163 225 0.78 0.70 Meter Summary 7 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 s Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 02- Dec -96 1,521 54 337 69 148 202 0.71 0.70 03- Dec -96 1,452 56 415 66 134 197 0.58 0.70 04- Dec -96 1,442 57 418 67 133 208 0.56 0.70 05- Dec -96 1,421 57 419 66 135 191 0.55 0.70 06- Dec -96 1,393 56 301 72 136 184 0.64 0.70 07- Dec -96 1,522 74 365 79 148 197 0.66 0.70 08- Dec -96 1,509 74 401 68 151 199 0.62 0.70 09- Dec -96 1,422 58 457 71 135 184 0.52 0.70 10- Dec -96 1,365 51 480 71 133 180 0.45 0.70 11- Dec -96 1,411 58 625 69 135 180 0.35 0.70 12- Dec -96 1,420 61 591 70 131 180 0.39 0.69 13- Dec -96 1,374 59 277 72 128 181 0.66 0.69 14- Dec -96 1,493 68 306 77 146 195 0.70 0.69 15- Dec -96 1,523 73 304 67 151 199 0.73 0.69 16- Dec -96 1,444 60 304 71 138 183 0.69 0.69 17- Dec -96 1,387 57 304 74 141 177 0.63 0.69 18- Dec -96 1,441 61 304 71 131 179 0.70 0.69 19- Dec -96 1,533 61 304 76 132 178 0.78 0.69 20- Dec -96 1,471 60 237 73 131 190 0.78 0.68 21- Dec -96 1,478 72 251 75 143 204 0.73 0.67 22- Dec -96 1,469 66 268 69 140 208 0.72 0.67 23- Dec -96 1,443 61 310 73 139 201 0.66 0.66 24- Dec -96 1,473 60 335 68 145 211 0.65 0.66 25- Dec -96 1,399 61 351 56 140 217 0.57 0.66 26- Dec -96 1,425 58 272 73 132 225 0.67 0.65 27- Dec -96 1,373 60 196 73 134 221 0.69 0.65 28- Dec -96 1,413 63 208 70 138 224 0.71 0.65 29- Dec -96 1,416 65 212 66 136 228 0.71 0.65 30- Dec -96 1,361 61 227 69 128 214 0.66 0.64 31- Dec -96 1,364 63 223 72 130 210 0.67 0.64 01 -Jan-97 1,396 62 230 61 139 213 0.69 0.64 02 -Jan-97 2,177 56 239 70 129 189 1.49 0.64 2.34 03 -Jan-97 2,374 57 233 74 128 189 1.69 0.64 2.66 04 -Jan-97 1,828 77 337 92 202 250 0.87 0.64 05 -Jan-97 1,678 74 311 77 169 239 0.81 0.64 06 -Jan-97 1,508 59 320 77 150 210 0.69 0.64 07 -Jan-97 1,455 57 331 72 142 203 0.65 0.64 08 -Jan-97 1,419 55 325 70 142 204 0.62 0.64 09 -Jan-97 1,417 55 278 71 141 218 0.65 0.64 10 -Jan-97 1,384 58 232 72 137 223 0.66 0.64 11 -Jan-97 1,524 70 253 78 154 239 0.73 0.64 12 -Jan-97 1,509 62 312 65 154 243 0.67 0.64 13 -Jan-97 1,390 58 302 65 142 222 0.60 0.65 14 -Jan-97 1,357 54 302 68 130 214 0.59 0.65 15 -Jan-97 1,356 52 302 67 133 219 0.58 0.66 16 -Jan-97 1,384 61 302 65 138 224 0.59 0.66 17 -Jan-97 1,347 52 302 67 127 227 0.57 0.66 18 -Jan-97 1,434 59 302 70 144 243 0.62 0.67 Meter Summary 8 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) 1/I Peak Factor 19 -Jan-97 1,433 59 302 67 153 244 0.61 0.67 20 -Jan-97 1,416 56 302 75 139 230 0.61 0.67 21 -Jan-97 1,397 50 302 67 136 235 0.61 0.67 22 -Jan-97 1,390 51 302 70 132 226 0.61 0.67 23 -Jan-97 1,386 54 302 68 132 226 0.60 0.67 24 -Jan-97 1,333 53 302 64 124 219 0.57 0.67 25 -Jan-97 1,418 65 302 67 142 236 0.61 0.67 26 -Jan-97 1,435 63 302 62 142 245 0.62 0.67 27 -Jan-97 1,351 54 302 64 130 221 0.58 0.67 28 -Jan-97 1,323 56 302 66 129 224 0.55 0.68 29 -Jan-97 1,312 60 302 70 124 224 0.53 0.68 30 -Jan-97 1,318 52 302 65 125 226 0.55 0.68 31 -Jan-97 1,480 58 302 70 140 224 0.69 0.68 O1- Feb -97 1,362 63 302 69 136 259 0.53 0.68 02- Feb -97 1,428 56 302 65 140 247 0.62 0.69 03- Feb -97 1,332 50 302 63 127 230 0.56 0.69 04- Feb -97 1,306 49 302 68 123 230 0.53 0.69 05- Feb -97 1,482 62 302 70 140 230 0.68 0.69 06- Feb -97 1,482 62 302 70 140 230 0.68 0.69 07- Feb -97 1,482 62 302 70 140 230 0.68 0.70 08- Feb -97 1,523 62 302 74 134 212 0.74 0.70 09- Feb -97 1,557 62 302 63 142 217 0.77 0.70 10- Feb -97 1,482 62 302 70 140 231 0.68 0.70 11- Feb -97 1,436 62 302 61 121 231 0.66 0.70 12- Feb -97 1,421 62 302 65 120 231 0.64 0.70 13- Feb -97 1,452 54 302 64 125 200 0.71 0.71 14- Feb -97 1,428 53 302 72 122 194 0.69 0.71 15- Feb -97 1,508 63 302 67 137 208 0.73 0.72 16- Feb -97 1,491 56 302 62 134 212 0.72 0.72 17- Feb -97 1,525 55 302 65 135 209 0.76 0.73 18- Feb -97 1,514 52 302 65 132 212 0.75 0.73 19- Feb -97 1,454 49 284 67 132 194 0.73 0.74 20- Feb -97 1,571 58 290 70 143 218 0.79 0.74 21- Feb -97 1,496 55 263 70 134 209 0.77 0.74 22- Feb -97 1,551 60 276 74 137 221 0.78 0.74 23- Feb -97 1,582 60 303 64 141 232 0.78 0.75 24- Feb -97 1,477 51 253 66 133 212 0.76 0.75 25- Feb -97 1,478 52 262 68 128 217 0.75 0.76 26- Feb -97 1,473 54 278 73 129 209 0.73 0.77 27- Feb -97 1,497 59 267 73 134 227 0.74 0.78 28- Feb -97 1,460 54 302 69 129 222 0.68 0.79 01- Mar -97 1,750 74 235 78 165 276 0.92 0.80 02- Mar -97 1,658 68 238 73 156 285 0.84 0.80 03- Mar -97 1,543 58 234 65 139 224 0.82 0.81 04 -Mar-97 1,500 55 260 65 130 236 0.76 0.82 05 -Mar-97 1,524 57 261 64 133 270 0.74 0.83 06 -Mar-97 1,484 54 230 66 132 236 0.77 0.83 07 -Mar-97 1,518 54 201 72 132 207 0.85 0.84 Meter Summary 9 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) nFlow 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) 1/1 Peak Factor 08 -Mar-97 1,615 61 224 75 148 241 0.87 0.85 09 -Mar-97 1,776 68 273 74 168 273 0.92 0.86 10 -Mar-97 1,706 58 305 70 160 283 0.83 0.87 11 -Mar-97 1,683 57 342 74 156 287 0.77 0.87 12 -Mar-97 1,654 54 347 70 153 272 0.76 0.88 13 -Mar-97 1,637 55 302 68 151 250 0.81 0.88 14 -Mar-97 1,582 52 233 68 149 209 0.87 0.88 15 -Mar-97 1,680 63 248 76 155 226 0.91 0.89 16 -Mar-97 1,745 64 283 68 169 235 0.93 0.89 17 -Mar-97 1,630 54 296 69 150 218 0.84 0.90 18 -Mar-97 1,596 52 378 69 149 214 0.73 0.90 19 -Mar-97 1,692 61 519 76 159 230 0.65 0.90 20 -Mar-97 1,833 66 413 82 176 272 0.82 0.90 21 -Mar-97 2,121 72 413 97 210 328 1.00 0.91 22 -Mar-97 2,375 71 482 111 244 363 1.10 0.91 23 -Mar-97 2,409 75 515 100 254 359 1.11 0.91 24 -Mar-97 2,251 61 523 101 229 309 1.03 0.91 25 -Mar-97 2,164 61 574 95 225 296 0.91 0.92 26 -Mar-97 2,329 70 636 106 252 327 0.94 0.92 27 -Mar-97 2,974 86 579 136 382 416 1.37 0.92 1.50 28 -Mar-97 3,263 95 419 157 335 491 1.77 0.92 1.92 29 -Mar-97 2,952 97 386 131 310 446 1.58 0.92 1.71 30 -Mar-97 2,703 86 354 117 285 389 1.47 0.93 1.59 31 -Mar-97 2,536 81 364 114 290 351 1.34 0.93 1.43 01- Apr -97 2,465 80 382 117 258 344 1.28 0.94 02- Apr -97 2,393 82 388 107 245 333 1.24 0.94 03- Apr -97 2,333 81 345 107 243 353 1.20 0.94 04- Apr -97 2,245 78 327 104 235 331 1.17 0.95 05- Apr -97 2,523 91 381 111 259 361 1.32 0.95 06- Apr -97 2,672 87 409 115 268 386 1.41 0.95 1.48 07- Apr -97 2,340 79 388 105 231 340 1.20 0.96 08- Apr -97 2,190 72 409 100 208 308 1.09 0.96 09- Apr -97 2,130 70 446 95 205 299 1.02 0.96 10- Apr -97 2,119 68 403 97 205 318 1.03 0.97 11- Apr -97 2,053 67 286 94 195 308 1.10 0.97 12- Apr -97 2,141 74 296 96 213 313 1.15 0.97 13- Apr -97 2,141 73 312 89 215 310 1.14 0.97 14- Apr -97 2,015 69 314 88 198 290 1.06 0.97 15- Apr -97 1,930 63 328 91 185 278 0.99 0.98 16- Apr -97 1,940 65 358 91 183 310 0.93 0.98 17- Apr -97 1,878 64 329 95 181 278 0.93 0.98 18- Apr -97 1,913 68 375 95 182 296 0.90 0.98 19- Apr -97 2,030 75 357 99 202 314 0.98 0.98 20- Apr -97 2,032 76 357 88 196 317 1.00 0.98 21- Apr -97 1,905 60 357 83 184 294 0.93 0.98 22- Apr -97 1,862 61 357 84 175 289 0.90 0.99 23- Apr -97 1,828 61 357 82 177 287 0.87 0.99 24- Apr -97 1,804 65 357 80 173 287 0.84 0.99 Meter Summary 10 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 25- Apr -97 1,768 63 357 91 170 282 0.81 0.99 26- Apr -97 1,884 71 357 100 179 297 0.88 0.99 27- Apr -97 1,936 75 357 90 184 306 0.92 0.99 28- Apr -97 1,842 60 357 89 168 285 0.88 0.99 29- Apr -97 1,761 61 357 85 163 279 0.82 0.99 30- Apr -97 1,808 66 357 81 165 286 0.85 0.99 O1- May -97 1,772 61 357 89 163 271 0.83 0.99 02- May -97 1,802 62 357 96 165 268 0.85 0.98 03- May -97 1,995 77 257 89 182 304 1.09 0.98 04- May -97 1,960 71 263 90 187 297 1.05 0.98 05- May -97 1,860 60 252 77 169 277 1.02 0.98 06- May -97 1,775 57 244 82 158 267 0.97 0.98 07- May -97 1,829 60 262 90 172 287 0.96 0.97 08- May -97 1,918 64 271 87 174 318 1.01 0.97 09- May -97 1,845 58 261 87 164 289 0.99 0.96 10- May -97 1,908 72 260 91 177 266 1.04 0.96 11- May -97 1,913 73 260 89 179 265 1.05 0.96 12- May -97 1,851 64 277 91 169 260 0.99 0.95 13- May -97 1,805 62 277 88 162 255 0.96 0.95 14- May -97 1,770 63 245 87 161 248 0.97 0.94 15- May -97 1,748 65 231 81 158 244 0.97 0.94 16- May -97 1,742 68 226 87 157 251 0.95 0.94 17- May -97 1,836 75 238 87 169 270 1.00 0.93 18- May -97 1,917 77 260 81 173 278 1.05 0.93 19- May -97 1,774 60 248 79 159 247 0.98 0.93 20- May -97 1,716 59 247 78 150 216 0.97 0.92 21- May -97 1,777 62 246 85 155 268 0.96 0.92 22- May -97 1,717 58 232 78 153 252 0.94 0.92 23- May -97 1,680 58 222 81 150 243 0.93 0.92 24- May -97 1,675 72 225 81 149 252 0.90 0.92 25- May -97 1,670 65 213 82 149 261 0.90 0.92 26- May -97 1,808 72 245 75 170 273 0.97 0.92 27- May -97 1,724 62 248 76 149 254 0.93 0.92 28- May -97 1,694 58 251 81 146 256 0.90 0.93 29- May -97 1,724 61 247 77 147 236 0.96 0.93 30- May -97 1,695 57 246 86 143 227 0.94 0.93 31- May -97 1,762 67 248 97 156 240 0.95 0.93 O1- Jun -97 1,814 69 254 92 158 246 0.99 0.93 02- Jun -97 1,740 59 256 86 150 228 0.96 0.94 03- Jun -97 1,667 59 257 83 134 219 0.91 0.94 04- Jun -97 1,676 61 259 81 140 229 0.91 0.94 05- Jun -97 1,660 58 247 78 140 223 0.91 0.94 06- Jun -97 1,655 59 218 85 142 230 0.92 0.94 07- Jun -97 1,714 69 224 89 150 242 0.94 0.94 08- Jun -97 1,757 67 238 85 158 251 0.96 0.94 09- Jun -97 1,672 60 238 76 141 238 0.92 0.94 10- Jun -97 2,573 58 245 77 134 233 1.83 0.94 1.94 11- Jun -97 3,318 64 251 78 136 232 2.56 0.94 2.71 Meter Summary 11 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) 1/1 Peak Factor 12- Jun -97 1,591 57 245 81 135 231 0.84 0.94 13- Jun -97 1,570 63 234 85 131 222 0.84 0.94 14- Jun -97 1,593 65 231 97 139 238 0.82 0.94 15- Jun -97 1,649 72 242 85 147 250 0.85 0.95 16- Jun -97 1,622 58 249 86 143 235 0.85 0.95 17- Jun -97 1,544 58 239 77 131 222 0.82 0.95 18- Jun -97 1,538 59 239 77 133 215 0.81 0.95 19- Jun -97 1,559 59 245 77 133 216 0.83 0.95 20- Jun -97 1,589 62 230 80 131 214 0.87 0.95 21- Jun -97 1,614 65 229 85 136 220 0.88 0.95 22- Jun -97 1,648 71 225 78 140 228 0.90 0.95 23- Jun -97 1,624 69 246 73 134 230 0.87 0.95 24- Jun -97 1,617 60 259 76 130 235 0.86 0.95 25- Jun -97 1,536 60 240 78 123 220 0.82 0.96 26- Jun -97 1,541 61 220 81 125 213 0.84 0.96 27- Jun -97 1,526 62 202 81 121 204 0.86 0.96 28- Jun -97 1,632 62 230 83 136 221 0.90 0.96 29- Jun -97 1,881 69 267 99 155 261 1.03 0.97 30- Jun -97 1,729 60 233 94 142 245 0.96 0.97 01- Jul -97 1,868 70 280 106 158 270 0.98 0.97 02- Jul -97 2,127 71 301 102 160 338 1.15 0.97 03- Jul -97 1,888 67 259 92 147 293 1.03 0.97 04- Jul -97 1,832 70 237 113 150 304 0.96 0.97 05- Jul -97 1,781 65 225 106 147 280 0.96 0.97 06- Jul -97 1,793 64 237 91 155 282 0.97 0.97 07- Jul -97 1,895 65 274 88 156 271 1.04 0.97 08- Jul -97 1,896 64 265 87 154 272 1.05 0.97 09- Jul -97 1,793 63 244 91 147 254 0.99 0.97 10- Jul -97 3,536 63 236 87 144 238 2.77 0.97 2.87 11- Jul -97 2,856 64 234 87 148 251 2.07 0.97 2.14 12- Jul -97 1,808 66 230 100 163 270 0.98 0.97 13- Jul -97 2,030 82 316 106 202 312 1.01 0.96 14- Jul -97 1,989 72 300 96 194 296 1.03 0.96 15- Jul -97 1,875 66 262 90 170 286 1.00 0.96 16- Jul -97 1,889 67 287 94 163 257 1.02 0.96 17- Jul -97 1,887 75 269 104 158 267 1.01 0.97 18- Jul -97 1,825 62 245 95 163 262 1.00 0.97 19- Jul -97 2,028 68 285 105 181 299 1.09 0.98 20- Jul -97 2,033 73 270 97 186 296 1.11 0.98 21- Jul -97 1,974 60 272 91 187 290 1.08 0.99 22- Jul -97 4,320 132 690 226 440 642 2.19 0.99 2.21 23- Jul -97 3,370 108 480 168 321 530 1.76 0.99 1.77 24- Jul -97 2,788 92 368 134 256 394 1.54 1.00 1.55 25- Jul -97 2,466 100 402 145 277 411 1.13 1.00 26- Jul -97 2,314 95 369 133 251 376 1.09 1.00 27- Jul -97 2,213 87 346 113 239 358 1.07 1.00 28- Jul -97 2,107 77 332 108 219 320 1.05 1.01 29- Jul -97 2,033 74 310 108 205 290 1.05 1.01 I Meter Summary 12 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 30- Jul -97 2,085 75 293 106 197 281 1.13 1.01 31- Jul -97 2,025 73 275 100 198 303 1.08 1.02 O1- Aug -97 2,018 77 258 102 194 314 1.07 1.02 02- Aug -97 1,998 73 249 104 196 318 1.06 1.02 03- Aug -97 2,035 71 252 96 194 337 1.09 1.02 04- Aug -97 2,086 71 281 96 177 322 1.14 1.02 05- Aug -97 1,913 64 279 96 173 318 0.98 1.02 06- Aug -97 2,008 67 308 95 185 321 1.03 1.02 07- Aug -97 1,898 69 284 100 182 272 0.99 1.02 08- Aug -97 1,824 62 278 97 183 270 0.93 1.02 09- Aug -97 1,828 69 278 96 178 276 0.93 1.02 10- Aug -97 1,806 67 275 91 176 279 0.92 1.02 1I- Aug -97 1,724 63 268 84 164 263 0.88 1.02 12- Aug -97 1,684 63 271 86 160 260 0.84 1.02 13- Aug -97 1,680 63 269 83 153 256 0.86 1.02 14- Aug -97 1,697 62 257 84 153 261 0.88 1.03 15- Aug -97 1,700 62 248 88 156 258 0.89 1.03 16- Aug -97 1,730 67 253 92 154 259 0.90 1.03 17- Aug -97 1,717 68 243 74 157 262 0.91 1.03 18- Aug -97 1,659 59 249 75 152 254 0.87 1.03 19- Aug -97 2,733 107 469 128 253 415 1.36 1.03 1.32 20- Aug -97 2,875 91 416 142 263 472 1.49 1.03 1.44 21- Aug -97 2,324 77 323 110 217 348 1.25 1.03 22- Aug -97 2,124 70 294 106 205 307 1.14 1.03 23- Aug -97 2,140 76 299 107 209 312 1.14 1.03 24- Aug -97 2,101 80 291 101 204 308 1.12 1.03 25- Aug -97 1,986 67 284 87 194 287 1.07 1.03 26- Aug -97 1,837 67 278 93 185 257 0.96 1.03 27- Aug -97 1,953 72 280 92 173 297 1.04 1.03 28- Aug -97 1,850 62 261 93 176 232 1.03 1.02 29- Aug -97 1,812 66 260 85 170 226 1.01 1.02 30- Aug -97 2,028 78 302 93 181 260 1.11 1.02 31- Aug -97 1,893 69 258 89 176 252 1.05 1.02 01- Sep -97 2,027 74 296 84 202 236 1.14 1.01 02- Sep -97 1,972 66 301 87 184 265 1.07 1.01 03- Sep -97 1,834 67 298 89 173 236 0.97 1.01 04- Sep -97 2,612 67 252 81 171 259 1.78 1.00 1.78 05- Sep -97 1,813 84 266 100 164 259 0.94 1.00 06- Sep -97 1,854 84 262 103 172 259 0.97 1.00 07- Sep -97 1,875 88 253 82 178 259 1.02 0.99 08- Sep -97 1,860 78 268 85 179 259 0.99 0.99 09- Sep -97 2,018 79 289 92 181 259 1.12 0.99 10- Sep -97 1,885 78 269 87 178 259 1.01 0.99 11- Sep -97 1,809 85 251 87 170 259 0.96 0.99 12- Sep -97 1,766 76 245 88 166 259 0.93 0.99 13- Sep -97 1,820 86 252 89 173 259 0.96 0.99 14- Sep -97 1,873 87 253 85 178 259 1.01 0.99 15- Sep -97 1,794 79 269 82 164 259 0.94 0.99 Meter Summary 13 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 i Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 16- Sep -97 2,722 110 463 134 280 330 1.41 0.99 1.43 17- Sep -97 2,491 103 428 117 228 319 1.30 0.99 18- Sep -97 2,289 100 354 101 211 266 1.26 0.99 19- Sep -97 2,108 90 263 95 191 263 1.21 0.98 20- Sep -97 2,072 90 272 90 199 288 1.13 0.98 21- Sep -97 2,111 91 273 81 202 300 1.17 0.98 22- Sep -97 1,991 82 270 80 186 288 1.09 0.98 23- Sep -97 1,924 80 269 86 178 276 1.03 0.98 24- Sep -97 1,897 75 273 82 180 271 1.02 0.98 25- Sep -97 1,865 78 258 85 172 264 1.01 0.97 26- Sep -97 1,794 75 242 84 165 243 0.99 0.97 27- Sep -97 1,877 87 243 90 179 264 1.01 0.96 28- Sep -97 1,948 85 256 88 182 279 1.06 0.96 29- Sep -97 1,821 74 258 86 169 260 0.97 0.96 30- Sep -97 1,720 72 259 78 156 253 0.90 0.95 O1- Oct -97 1,699 70 256 74 161 244 0.89 0.95 02- Oct -97 1,702 79 241 76 159 239 0.91 0.95 03- Oct -97 1,667 70 233 81 151 237 0.90 0.95 04- Oct -97 1,737 78 238 83 167 248 0.92 0.94 05- Oct -97 1,755 81 240 77 165 253 0.94 0.94 06- Oct -97 1,660 73 246 71 157 229 0.88 0.93 07- Oct -97 1,630 70 262 72 152 238 0.84 0.93 08- Oct -97 1,630 75 264 73 155 236 0.83 0.92 09- Oct -97 1,627 72 264 72 151 237 0.83 0.92 10- Oct -97 1,571 75 213 80 152 217 0.83 0.92 11- Oct -97 1,648 81 228 84 156 229 0.87 0.91 12- Oct -97 2,004 92 324 87 187 331 0.98 0.91 13- Oct -97 1,975 80 310 88 178 305 1.01 0.91 14- Oct -97 1,755 74 279 81 162 240 0.92 0.90 15- Oct -97 1,717 78 261 84 157 231 0.91 0.90 16- Oct -97 1,679 78 251 84 157 241 0.87 0.89 17- Oct -97 1,629 75 239 89 156 244 0.82 0.89 18- Oct -97 1,742 79 239 85 166 245 0.93 0.89 19- Oct -97 1,803 88 257 81 171 250 0.96 0.89 20- Oct -97 1,709 76 272 91 159 233 0.88 0.88 21- Oct -97 1,656 73 294 93 146 229 0.82 0.88 22- Oct -97 1,636 76 285 89 149 229 0.81 0.87 23- Oct -97 1,646 75 278 82 151 223 0.84 0.87 24- Oct -97 1,600 71 226 82 150 219 0.85 0.86 25- Oct -97 1,679 78 247 82 169 234 0.87 0.85 26- Oct -97 1,752 86 261 79 174 253 0.90 0.85 27- Oct -97 1,642 72 260 75 153 229 0.85 0.84 28- Oct -97 1,589 72 248 80 148 229 0.81 0.84 29- Oct -97 1,566 79 245 79 146 223 0.79 0.83 30- Oct -97 1,597 76 235 81 154 223 0.83 0.83 31- Oct -97 1,580 77 255 70 155 218 0.81 0.83 O1- Nov -97 1,714 92 273 71 165 239 0.87 0.82 02- Nov -97 1,739 81 280 74 166 255 0.88 0.81 I Meter Summary 14 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 03- Nov -97 1,614 71 283 69 149 230 0.81 0.81 04- Nov -97 1,583 72 315 72 142 224 0.76 0.81 05- Nov -97 1,597 78 328 72 146 245 0.73 0.80 06- Nov -97 3,063 82 299 70 142 231 2.24 0.80 2.81 07- Nov -97 2,779 79 224 74 140 223 2.04 0.79 2.57 08- Nov -97 1,582 81 250 71 148 238 0.79 0.79 09- Nov -97 1,631 84 257 64 158 248 0.82 0.79 10- Nov -97 1,549 77 268 70 147 231 0.76 0.78 11- Nov -97 1,518 74 258 73 142 222 0.75 0.78 12- Nov -97 1,498 85 263 73 141 221 0.72 0.78 13- Nov -97 1,488 80 247 67 140 237 0.72 0.78 14- Nov -97 1,466 79 236 66 137 247 0.70 0.78 15- Nov -97 1,587 88 243 71 152 254 0.78 0.77 16- Nov -97 1,644 84 252 70 159 264 0.81 0.77 17- Nov -97 1,513 78 244 69 147 238 0.74 0.77 18- Nov -97 1,490 78 255 71 144 217 0.72 0.76 19- Nov -97 1,455 75 239 65 144 206 0.73 0.76 20- Nov -97 1,453 80 235 68 143 202 0.73 0.76 21- Nov -97 1,444 76 215 72 136 202 0.74 0.76 22- Nov -97 1,564 89 234 77 155 220 0.79 0.75 23- Nov -97 1,616 91 249 66 161 228 0.82 0.75 24- Nov -97 1,503 80 243 69 146 210 0.76 0.75 25- Nov -97 1,486 78 253 71 143 210 0.73 0.74 26- Nov -97 1,498 81 254 79 143 212 0.73 0.74 27- Nov -97 1,586 82 253 58 157 233 0.80 0.74 28- Nov -97 1,499 79 238 69 141 223 0.75 0.74 29- Nov -97 1,559 80 276 69 149 238 0.75 0.74 30- Nov -97 1,597 85 277 61 162 240 0.77 0.73 O1- Dec -97 1,497 75 276 65 143 221 0.72 0.73 02- Dec -97 1,446 75 289 66 138 223 0.65 0.73 03- Dec -97 1,448 77 289 71 138 220 0.65 0.73 04- Dec -97 2,896 79 289 64 136 218 2.11 0.73 2.90 05- Dec -97 2,565 77 289 65 139 212 1.78 0.73 2.45 06- Dec -97 1,493 89 289 70 151 235 0.66 0.72 07- Dec -97 1,525 88 289 65 157 241 0.68 0.72 08- Dec -97 1,413 77 289 62 138 218 0.63 0.72 09- Dec -97 1,379 77 289 63 133 217 0.60 0.72 10- Dec -97 1,396 78 289 73 134 218 0.60 0.72 11- Dec -97 1,404 80 289 66 137 206 0.63 0.72 12- Dec -97 1,410 77 289 69 137 204 0.63 0.72 13- Dec -97 1,528 86 248 77 149 222 0.75 0.72 14- Dec -97 1,562 86 259 66 157 228 0.77 0.72 15- Dec -97 1,469 76 241 75 138 212 0.73 0.72 16- Dec -97 1,418 74 257 67 133 210 0.68 0.71 17- Dec -97 1,425 76 264 68 135 206 0.68 0.71 18- Dec -97 1,410 75 238 70 138 200 0.69 0.71 19- Dec -97 1,413 79 229 69 134 201 0.70 0.71 20- Dec -97 1,538 91 237 68 154 220 0.77 0.71 Meter Summary 15 of 16 6/9/1998 Shorewood Summary MCES Meter Readings WSB Project # 2010.00 * Total Meter Flow = M415 minus all other meters Date Corrected Meter Readings M415 M416 M417 M417A M419 M420 (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) (1000 gpd) TOTAL* Metered Flow (MGD) 70 -Day Avg Flow (peaks removed) (MGD) I/I Peak Factor 21- Dec -97 1,541 85 231 66 160 227 0.77 0.71 22- Dec -97 1,481 77 238 68 144 210 0.74 0.71 23- Dec -97 1,467 77 234 68 150 214 0.72 0.71 24- Dec -97 1,519 83 236 61 157 229 0.75 0.71 25- Dec -97 1,403 80 221 49 142 222 0.69 0.71 26- Dec -97 1,435 82 244 63 144 218 0.69 0.71 27- Dec -97 1,458 79 247 64 146 215 0.71 0.71 28- Dec -97 1,453 82 232 61 148 223 0.71 0.70 29- Dec -97 1,429 76 241 72 141 212 0.69 0.70 30- Dec -97 1,398 77 251 66 141 209 0.65 0.70 31- Dec -97 1,436 78 262 65 137 212 0.68 0.70 Average 1,753 66 294 81 159 244 0.91 0.86 2.06 Max 4,320 132 690 226 440 642 2.79 1.07 3.06 Min 1,247 47 196 49 101 142 0.35 0.63 95th % value 1.33 Meter Summary 16 of 16 6/9/1998 Updated April 6,1998 d 'a c d J � y N O d y 4 - U b d O C C V O d G N R U N °C c '` c U U u c O v y L d y ,6 _ ` y O y N V Date Line No Manhole ° c _c o " W x _E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 2/1811998 1 3 1 Convinton Road 2/18/1998 1 4 Convinton Road Sevice Pipe needs Grout 2/18/1998 1 5 Convinton Road 2/18/1998 1 6 Convinton Road 2118/1998 1 7 Convinton Road 2118/1998 1 8 F Convinton Road 1 1 E Convinton Road 1 2E Convinton Road 2/18/1998 1 vine hill mh E Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2 1 A F Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2 2 A F Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2j 3 A F Convinton Road 2125/1998 21 4 A Convinton Road 92511998 2 5 A Convinton Road 2/2511998 2 6 A Convinton Road 2/01998 2 7 G Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2 8 D G Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2 9 IG I Convinton Road 2/25/1998 2 10 D Convinton Road 3 Metro Force Main, HWY 7 4 1 Lake St, CR 19, Mtka Portable Dredgeing 4 2 Lake St, CR 19, Mtka Portable Dredgeing 4 3 Lake St, CR 19, Mtka Portable Dredgeing 4 4 Lake St, CR 19, Mika Portable Dredgeing 5 1 A CR 19, BeeHrle Ave 5 2 A CR 19, BeeHrle Ave 5 3 A CR 19, BeeHrle Ave 6 1 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 2 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 3 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 3/9/98 Done, Rocks 6 4 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 5 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 6 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease Grout needed around service connection 6 7 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 8 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 9 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 3-9-98 Done 6 10 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 12 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 13 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 14 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 6 15 A R &R Tr, CR 19, Timber Ln Ease 7 1 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 2 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 4 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 5 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 3/9/98 Done Ok 7 6 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 7 A Metro, Valle Wood Rd Ease 2113/1998 7 11 A D F Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 2/13/1998 7 12 A D F Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 2113/1998 7 13 A F Metro, Valle Wood Rd Ease 2/13/1998 7 14 A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 15 A Metro, Valle Wood Rd Ease 7110E A TG Ea Metro, Valle Wood Rd se 2/13/1998 711 A D Metro, Valle Wood Rd Ea se MN Insp Page 1 619/1998 Updated April 6,1998 v w c TO c i c v ut w a tr c « w V O W C _ R � N t = d J C O C V V v � A y C `w o c R N _7: Date Line No Manhole E m _c c o a o s x E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 7 1A A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 BE A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease 7 9E A Metro, Valley Wood Rd Ease F2/12/1998 Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 8 2 A Lorenze,Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 212/1998 8 3 A I Lorenze, Easement Gravel on Shelf Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/12/1998 8 4 A F Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/12/1998 8 5 A Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/1211998 8 6 C Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/12/1998 81 7 C Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2112/1998 8 8 C Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 9 Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 10 Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 11 F Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 12 B Lorenze, Easement 1 Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 81 14 Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 15 Lorene, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/1311998 8 16 Lorene, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/13/1998 8 17 Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 8 1 E A Lorene, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/12/1998 8 6A G Lorenze, Easement Edgewood Rd, Wildrose Ln, Grant 2/12/1998 8 7A C Lorenze, Easement 2/18/1998 9 1 D F Howards Pt. 2/18/1998 9 2 F G Howards Pt. 2/1811998 9 3 D F G Howards Pt. 2/1811998 9 4 D I IG I Howards Pt. 2118/1998 9 5 Howards Pt. 3/9/98 Done Casting pushed past 2/18/1998 9 6 Howards Pt. rings 2/18/1998 9 7 Howards Pt. 2/18/1998 9 8 G Howards Pt. 2/18/1998 9 9 G Howards Pt. 2/1811998 9 10 G Howards Pt. 9 11 Howards Pt. broken casting 9 12 IC Howards Pt. 2/1311998 10 1 A Strawberry Ln, Grant Loren Rd 2/13/1998 10 2 A Strawberry Ln, Grant Loren Rd 2/13/1998 10 3 A Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2/1311998 10 4 A Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2/13/1998 10 5 A Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd wall of manhole 2/13/1998 10 6 Staawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd needs repair I MN lnsp Page 2 6/9/1998 Updated April6J998 d � u c d g a v > c c °� U CC U O L N A U J C C V V y Ol C R O u y C L d d b p d Date Line No Manhole E " %= E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 2/1311998 10 7 A D F I Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd center casting & grout 2/20/1998 10 8 A I I Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2/20/1998 10 9 A D I IStrawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2120/1998 10 10A F I I Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd needs a little 2/20/1998 10 11 A C Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd Side wall has hole to be grouted 2/20/1998 10 12 A D F Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd Inflitration through rings, Sand on sides of invert 2/2011998 10 13 A F Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2/2011998 10 14 A C Strawberry Ln, Grant Lorenz Rd 2119/1998 11 1 A C W 62nd St, Strawbemy Ln, W 62nd Easement Roots 2/19/1998 11 2 A B W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement 319/98 Done 2119/1998 11 3 A W 62nd St, Strawbemy Ln, W 62nd Easement 2/19/1998 11 4 A F W 62nd St, Strawberrry Ln, W 62nd Easement 3/9/98 Done 2/19/1998 11 5 A K W 62nd St, Strawbemy Ln, W 62nd Easement 3/9/98 Done Hole in MH Cover 2/19/1998 11 6 A W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement Medium Blockage in Invert 2/19/1998 11 71A I I W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement Conc on side of Invert 2/19/1998 11 8 A W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement One Cone Chunk 2/19/1998 11 9 A W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement Hole in MH Cover 2/19/1998 11 10 A W 62nd St, Strawberry Ln, W 62nd Easement Hole in MH Cover 2/26/1998 12 1 A ISItver Lake Easement Hole in MH Cover 2/26/1998 12 2 A Silver Lake Easement Sand &Gravel 212611998 12 4 A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 5 A Silver Lake Easement 2/2611998 12 6 A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 7 A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 8 A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 9 A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 121 10A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 3A A Silver Lake Easement 212611998 12 4A A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 8A A Silver Lake Easement 2/26/1998 12 9A A Silver Lake Easement 2/25/1998 13 1 F Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 2 C Chrismas Lake Road Through Lid 2125/1998 13 3 F Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 4 F G Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 5 IF I Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 6 D F I IChrismas Lake Road 2125/1998 13 7 1 Chrismas Lake Road 2/2511998 13 8 D F I Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 9 D F G lChrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 10 D F Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 11 F I Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 4A D I Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 48 I Chrismas Lake Road 2/25/1998 13 5A D Chrismas Lake Road 14 1 Mill St, HWY 7, Gal in Lk Rd 14 2 Mill St, HWY 7, Gal in Lk Rd 2/25/19981 14 3 1 IF Mill St, HWY 7, Gal in Lk Rd I MN Insp Page 3 6/9/1998 Updated April 6,1998 � v c � m v y w v o O 0 m O lJ m U o a c m U J w C O C V V y Ol C V ro O " N " V CL E ° '` Date line No Manhole c o LL : " W i _E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 14 4 Mill St, HWY 7, Galpin Lk Rd 14 5 Mill St, HWY 7, Galpin Lk Rd 14 6 Mill St, HWY 7, Galpin Lk Rd 14 7 Mill St, HWY 7, Galpin Lk Rd 2/26/1998 14 8 Mill St, HWY 7, Galpin Lk Rd Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2/26/19981 15 1 Easement Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2/2611998 15 2 Easement 3/9198 Done Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2/26/1998 15 3 Easement Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2/26/1998 15 4 F Easement Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 212611998 15 5 Easement 3/9/1998 Done, OK Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2/26/1998 15 6 Easement 3/9/98 Done OK Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 2127/1998 15 7 Easement 319198 Done, Rocks Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, Pipe Inlet Leaks, 15 8 Easement watton ponds Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 151 9 Easement Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 15 10 Easement Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 15 11 Easement 3/9/98 Done, OK Grove St, Chaska Rd, Murray Hill Rd, 15 12 Easement 3/9/98 Done Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 3/2/1998 161 1 B Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 3/2/1998 16 2 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 3//9/98 Done, Hole 312/1998 16 3 F Easement in lid Mika Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 312/1998 16 4 B C Easement 39-98 Done Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 31211998 16 5 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 3/2/1998 16 6 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 3/2/1998 16 7 1 IG H O Easement Concrete Chunks Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn Small amount of 3/2/1998 16 8 Easement sand Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 9 Easement 3/9/98 Done OK Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 10 Easement 319/98 Done OK Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 11 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 12 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 13 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 14 Easement Mtka Dr, Gillette Curve, Elder Turn 16 13A Easement 17 1 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 2 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 3 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail I MN Insp Page 4 6/9/1998 Updated April 6,1998 u � c v 'm a > c p d C V y w 0 y C � N & U N u o ' d c K ~ o V H u J C C U V y C 5:6 ` O �. d j 3 '� L d d N 0 " o Date Line No Manhole E c c o ro x = E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 17 4 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 5 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 2120/1998 17 6 F Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail Through lid 2/20/1998 17 7 D F Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail Through Lid Casting needs Adjustment, sand & 17 11 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail gravel Casting needs 17 12 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail Adjustment 17 13 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 14 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail Sand & Gravel 17 15 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 16 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 17 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 18 Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 17 2A Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 4" Service 17 SA Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail 2120/1998 17 6A Pleasant Ave, Yellowstone Trail McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 3/2/1998 18 1 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 3/2/1998 18 2 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 2/25/1998 18 4 D F Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 2/25/1998 18 5 1 D F I Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 2/25/1998 18 6 D E F Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 3/2/1998 18 7 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 312/1998 18 8 H Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 312/1998 18 9 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka Needs MH Cover 2/26/1998 18 10 IH Dr, Clover Ln R &R McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 18 11 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 18 12 Dr, Clover Ln flushed 2127/98 McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 18 13 Dr, Clover Ln flushed 2/27/98 McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 18 14 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 18 15 Dr, Clover Ln McLain Rd, 3rd Ave, Brand Cir, Mtka 3/2/1998 18 7A B Dr, Clover Ln Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/13/1998 19 1 B Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/13/1998 19 2 B Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 19 3 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 19 4 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement 1 1 Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 19 5 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 19 6 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 19 7 1 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement I MN Insp Page 5 6/9/1998 Updated April 6,1998 y � c v a � c to a w � 0• c � c 0 d « d v s w O y c c b r U m a ro :' ' r c z U « J C C U U y C ° Date Line No Manhole E c " ,"� " W = E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 8 D F Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 9 F G Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 10 D F G I Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 11 D Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 12 1 Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 13 F Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 14 F Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement 3/9/98 Done -needs Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou new lid, cement on 2/12/1998 19 15 H Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement side of invert Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19 12A D Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement 3/9/98 Done Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou 2/12/1998 19113A F Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement a wig of roots Valley Wood Cir, Eureka Rd, Manitou drop band in invert 19 E3A Ln, Amlee Rd, Easement poop dam Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 1 IF I I Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 2 D I Meadow View, Birch Bluff roots Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 201 3 Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 4 D F Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/1211998 20 51 D Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 6 D G Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 7 D F Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 8 C Meadow View, Birch Bluff chipped casting Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 9 G H O Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 10 D Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 11 F Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wik1 Rose Ln, Rock and sand, 2/12/1998 20 12 H Meadow View, Birch Bluff obstr in inv Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 201 13 B Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 14 B Meadow View, Birch Bluff Sand on edge of inv Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 15 H Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 16 B Meadow View, Birch Bluff Sand on edge of inv Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, Small obstruction in 2/12/1998 20 17 D Meadow View, Birch Bluff inv Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, 2/12/1998 20 18 D G H O Meadow View, Birch Bluff Lee Cir, Sunny Vale, Wild Rose Ln, small obstruction in 2/12/1998 20 19 C Meadow View, Birch Bluff inv I MN Insp Page 6 61911998 Updated April 6,1998 v d v 2 > c y > rn w 0 w y O y c a 2 3 O 2 b U i u A cc J C U U u ` O v d ] G L ° Date Line No Manhole f D ` c d ' z " W I E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, small conc. chunk 21 1 Yellowstone Tr inv Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, Flushed 2/27/98, 21 2 Yellowstone Tr tots of poppy Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 I YellowstoneTr Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 3/9/98 Done, sand 21 3 and poop build up Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, Root infiltration, I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 3/9/98 done, Drop 2/12/1998 21 4 C Yellowstone Tr band in invert Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, sand and gravel on 2/1211998 21 5 D Yellowstone Tr sides of invert Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, Concrete chunks in 2/25/19981 21 6 Yellowstone Tr invert Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, Small obstruction in 212511998 21 7 Yellowstone Tr inv Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 3/9198 done, Drop 211811998 21 8 Yellowstone Tr Band half off Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 2/18/1998 21 9 F Yellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 3/211998 21 10 Yellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, 1 Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 21 11 Yellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 2120/1998 21 12 F IYellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 2/2011998 21 13 C Yellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, I I Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, I 2120/1998 21 14 G Yellowstone Tr Church Rd, Grant Lorenz Ease, Timber Ln, Sylvan Ln, Oak Ridge Cir, 2/20/1998 21 14A G Yellowstone Tr 211811998 22 2 G H O lVirginia Highlands 2/18/1998 22 3 G H Virginia Highlands 22 10 Virginia Highlands 22 11 D F H Virginia Highlands 22 12 C Virginia Highlands 22 13 F Virginia Highlands N 22 14 Virginia Highlands 22 15 D Virginia Highlands 22 16 Virginia Highlands P2 1E Virginia Highlands 22 4E Virginia Highlands 2/27/98 Flushed Rusty Colored 22,5E Virginia Highlands Blockage 2/27/98 Flushed Rusty Colored 22 Virginia Highlands Blockage MN Insp Page 7 6/911998 Updated April 6,1998 u °- � a v O c c c a U Z a v b S u o . d c b rs U H 2 R 0 .2 0 Date Line No Manhole E m � ` c c o LL s b W = E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 22 7E I I IVrginia Highlands Hole in MH Cover 22 8E Virginia Highlands 3/9198 Done - Roots 22 9E Virginia Highlands 2/27/98 Flushed Invert Blockage 23 1 Smithtown Road 23 2 Smithtown Road 3/9198 Done 23 3 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 4 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 5 Smithtown Road 23 6 Smithtown Road 23 7 Smithtown Road Sand & Gravel 23 8 Smithtown Road Root Infiltration 23 9 Smithtown Road Sand & Gravel 23 10 Smithtown Road Sand & Gravel 23 11 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 12 Smithtown Road Small obstruction in invert 23 13 Smithtown Road 23 14 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 15 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 16 Smithtown Road Hole in MH Cover 23 17 Smithtown Road 23 2a Smithtown Road 2/18/1998 24 1 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 2 Howard Point Road Done 319/98 2/18/1998 24 3 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 4 1 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 5 D G H O Howard Point Road 918/1998 24 6 F Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 7 IF I Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 8 F Howard Point Road 918/1998 24 9 Howard Point Road 2118/1998 24 10 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 11 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 12 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 13 Howard Point Road 918/1998 24 14 F G Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 15 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 16 Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 24 17 F Howard Point Road 918/1998 24 12A Howard Point Road 2/18/1998 25 1 1 IAfton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 2 1 IAfton Meadows 2/1811998 25 3 C I lAfton Meadows 2118/1998 25 4 F I I I Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 5 G Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 6 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 7 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 8 D I Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 9 Afton Meadows Work Completed 2/18/1998 25 10 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 251 11 D G Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 251 12 1 lAfton Meadows 2/18/1998 251 13 D I I Afton Meadows 2/1811998 251 14 IAfton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 15 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 16 D Afton Meadows 2118/1998 25 17 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 18 Afton Meadows 2/18/1998 25 19 F Afton Meadows 3/9/98 Flushed 26 1 Lake Easement - West End MN Insp Page 8 6/9/1998 Updated April 6,1998 d � v c d o d W 0 N C W V p A V ° G cc N b U N d J C O '` C V U O d 3: = d y b b d E Date Line No Manhole 2 m c c p —' w c ° W = E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 26 2 Lake Easement - West End 26 3 Lake Easement - West End 26 4 Lake Easement - West End 26 5 Lake Easement - West End 26 6 Lake Easement - West End 26 7 Lake Easement - West End 26 8 Lake Easement - West End 26 9 Lake Easement - West End 26 10 Lake Easement - West End 26 111 Lake Easement - West End 26 12 Lake Easement - West End 26 13 Lake Easement - West End 26 14 Lake Easement - West End 26 15 Lake Easement - West End 26 16 Lake Easement - West End 26 17 Lake Easement - West End 26 18 Lake Easement - West End 26 19 Lake Easement - West End 26 20 Lake Easement - West End 26 21 Lake Easement - West End 26 22 Lake Easement - West End 26 23 Lake Easement -West End 26 24 Lake Easement - West End 26 25 Lake Easement - West End 26 26 Lake Easement - West End 26 27 Lake Easement - West End 26 28 Lake Easement -West End 26 29 Lake Easement - West End 26 Lake Easement - West End 26 6A Lake Easement - West End 2668 Lake Easement - West End 2/18/1998 27 1 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 2 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 3 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 4 D F Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 5 B Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 01811998 271 6 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 271 7 1 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 91811998 27 8 D F Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 9 island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/1811998 27 10 E Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 11 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2118/1998 27 12 Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2118/1998 27 13 B Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 14 D Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 15 E Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 16 D Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 17 D Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 2/18/1998 27 18 B Island View, Pipebend, Woodside 28 10E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 2/1811998 28 11 E D Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln Under Snow 28 12E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 13E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 14E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 281 15E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln ' MN Insp Page 9 6,9/1996 Updated April 6,1998 u v c d o O � U � U O 1 L C N. b U N = d J O C ` C U U y C C y O Date Line No Manhole g b D o c S o LL c " W mo E A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O 28 16E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 17E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 18E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 2/18/1998 28 1A Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 20E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 21E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 2E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 3E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 84 Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 2815E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 6E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 7E I Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 8 1 Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 9E Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 E14A Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 28 E14B Easement, Woodside, Woodside Ln 29 1 jEdgewood Road, Easement 29 2 lEdgewood Road, Easement 29 3 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 4 jEdgewood Road, Easement 29 5 lEdgewood Road, Easement 29 6 jEdgewood Road, Easement 29 7 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 8 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 9 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 10 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 11 Edgewood Road, Easement 29 12 Edgewood Road, Easement 301 1 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 2 1 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 3 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 4 1 1 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 5 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 6 1 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 7 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr 30 1 8 Country Club Rd, CR 19, Timber Ln, Wedgewood Dr MN Insp Page 10 6/9/1998 ► . An Analysis of Minnesota Municipal Liquor Store Operations in 1996 Overview Minnesota's municipally owned and operated liquor stores reported an increase in net income for the third straight year. Municipal liquor stores reported an increase of 15.2 percent in net income for 1996, which was more than the 3.8 percent increase posted in 1995. Cities transferred $10.8 million in liquor store profits to other municipal accounts in 1996. This represents a decrease of 8.6 percent from the $11.9 million transferred in 1995. While the majority of municipal liquor stores were profitable in 1996, 23 cities reported a net loss in their municipal liquor operations. Thirty cities report a net loss in 1995. During 1996, Minnesota's municipally owned liquor stores reported: gross sales of $174.4 million, which was an increase of $10.2 million over 1995 gross sales; a net income of $14.4 million, which was $1.9 million more than the total net income reported in 1995. Background on Minnesota's Municipal Liquor Stores Minnesota law authorizes cities with fewer than 10,000 people to own and operate on -sale and off - sale liquor establishments.' During 1996, 252 Minnesota cities operated municipal liquor stores,. with 158 cities operating both on -sale and off -sale liquor establishments and 94 cities restricting their municipally -owned establishments to off -sale liquor stores. While the majority of municipally owned liquor stores are located in small cities in Greater Minnesota, 21 cities within the Twin Cities metropolitan area own and operate liquor establishments. Originally, Minnesota municipalities were authorized to own and operate liquor establishments as a means of controlling the sale of alcohol. Municipally -owned liquor stores also provided, and continue to provide, an added convenience for residents of small communities that Wright be unable to attract a privately -run establishment. However, as fiscal pressures on Minnesota municipalities have grown, the primary purpose for many of the current municipal liquor establishments has shifted to providing additional revenues to support public services. The number of cities operating municipal liquor stores has steadily declined for many years. In 1995, three cities discontinued their liquor operations; in 1996, six more cities discontinued their liquor operations. The six cities that opted to discontinue their municipal liquor stores in 1996 ' Once a city with a population under 10,000 people has established a municipal liquor store, it may continue to operate the store regardless of its subsequent population growth. s were: Brownton, Gary, Graceville, Grove City, Hills, and Oklee. In addition, three cities which had two or more liquor operations closed at least one of their businesses. Four of the five cities that discontinued their liquor operations in 1996 reported net losses in 1995. Figure 1 shows the decline in the number of municipal liquor stores. The Profitability of Minnesota's Municipal Liquor Stores During 1996, Minnesota's municipal liquor establishments reported a third consecutive year of record sales totaling $174.4 million. Total sales recorded in 1996 were up $10.2 million or 6.2% over sales reported in 1995. The stores reported a net income of $14.4 million in 1996, which was up 15.2 percent from net income reported in 1995. Total municipal liquor sales ranged from $8,633 in Gary to $7.3 million in Richfield. Net income and losses for municipal liquor stores ranged from a loss of $39,744 in Morgan to a profit of $705,033 in Richfield. Municipal liquor operations located within the Twin Cities metropolitan area are considerably larger and more profitable than their Greater Minnesota counterparts. Although only 21 of the 252 Minnesota cities (8.3 percent) that own and operate municipal liquor stores are located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, they represent 36.5 percent of the total sales and 31.1 percent of the net income of municipal liquor operations. Sales by metropolitan area establishments averaged $1.4 million in 1996, compared to average sales of $473,554 for Greater Minnesota municipal liquor stores .3 The average income of metropolitan stores was $101,613 in 1996 compared to an average of $42,324 for municipal liquor establishments in Greater Minnesota. All metropolitan cities except one reported profitable municipal liquor operations in 1996- Net income and losses among metropolitan liquor operations ranged from a loss of $28,403 in Shorewood to a profit of $705,033 in Richfield. Net income and losses among Greater Minnesota cities ranged from a loss of $39,744 in Morgan to a profit of $368,280 in Elk River. Z The Citv of Gary discontinued its liquor store on March 1, 1996- 3 The 21 cities in the metropolitan area that have municipal liquor operations operated a total of 44 establishments selling liquor on -sale and/or off -sale. The 231 Greater Minnesota cities with municipal liquor stores operated a total of 234 establishments. Average sales and net income reflect calculations based on the number of stores rather than the number of cities. 2 The municipal liquor establishments operated by 23 Minnesota cities reported net losses for 1996, compared to 30 cities in 1995. Twenty -two of the 23 cities with net losses are located in Greater Minnesota. The City of Shorewood (located in the Metropolitan Area) operates three establishments of which one store reported a net loss of ($59,936). The Greater Minnesota cities reporting net losses each operated one store. Table 1 lists the cities and the amount of loss reported in 1996. Table 1 Municipal Liquor Store Operations With Net Losses dame of1<ty N�e�s Name €l<tt mss . ......:..:... . Morgan Shorewood (Metro Location) Graceville Elgin Frazee ($39,744) (28,403) Lafayette 'Trimont ($3,280) (2,958) (28,328) Sherburn (2,933) (24,397) (17,122) Lake Benton Eagle Bend (2,361) (1,373) Delavan (12,439) Mapleton (1,304) Maynard Cleveland (10,897) (10,675) Cottonwood Kiester (1,228) (1,015) Lewisville (7,375) Hanley Falls (431) Currie (4,994) Leroy (331) Cook (4,431) Proctor (326) Waldorf (3,309) Liquor Store Profits Help Support Essential City Services During 1996, Minnesota's municipal liquor stores transferred $10.8 million of their profits to support essential city services. This represents a decrease of 8.6 percent from the total amount of transfers made in 1995. Liquor store profits that were not transferred to other municipal funds were used to bolster the fund balances of the liquor stores and purchase additional inventory. Cities that operate profitable municipal liquor stores and can transfer profits to other municipal funds are often able to hold down their property tax assessments for essential public services. Municipal Liquor Operations Warrant Careful Scrutiny City officials who are responsible for the operation of municipal liquor establishments must make certain that the operations are managed appropriately and continue to have a positive financial impact on the city. Minnesota law requires cities to hold a public hearing on the future of its liquor store(s) if the liquor operation has failed to make a profit in at least two of the past three years. Based on this statute, the following cities should have held a public hearing on their municipal liquor operations: Avoca Barnum Cleveland Currie Delavan Elbow Lake Frazee Goodridge Graceville Hadley Hanley Falls Kellogg Lafayette Lewisville Lismore Mabel Okabena Proctor Shorewood Trimont 3 In 1995, 14 cities were required to hold a public hearing on whether or not to continue to operate their municipal liquor stores. In 1996, the municipal liquor stores in 9 of those cities-reported a profit; 3 of the cities discontinued operations; and 2 cities continued to operate at a loss. Beyond the statutory responsibility of city officials to ensure that the liquor stores are making a profit, city officials also have a responsibility to ensure the liquor stores are managed efficiently and iquor stores with levels effectively. An analysis of the financial data for off -sale m nicii Table 2 highlights the of gross sales reveal large variances in total operating expenses. in operating expenses for stores with similar levels of total sales.' 4 A similar analysis for cities that operate both on-sale and off -sale liquor establishments is expenses of on -sale establishments are generally considerably higher than not possible. The operating the operating expenses of off -sale establishments. It would be inapp ro P riate to draw comparisons between the total operating expenses of on -sale and off -sale establishments c for contrasting the op expenses of a c�tywith a comparisons would be flawed due to the potential on with the operating expenses of a city with a large small on -sale operation and a large off -sale operati on -sale operation and a small off -sale operation. 4 Table 2 - Off -Sale Liquor Store Total Sales and Total Operating Expenses Data In Report Should Help City Officials This report provides city officials with comparative data to help fulfill their responsibility to provide for the effective management of municipal liquor store operations. City officials should use this report to compare their liquor store finances to the finances of municipal liquor stores with comparable levels of gross sales. Table 5, beginning on page 17, lists financial data for Minnesota's municipal liquor stores arranged by total gross sales of the stores. This table facilitates financial comparisons between liquor stores of similar sizes. Using the data in this manner, city officials can determine whether their gross profits (total sales minus the wholesale cost of sales) and operating expenses are appropriate. Cities with relatively low gross profits should consider whether the gross profits reflect their intended mark -up policies. If gross profits are well below the intended mark -up of inventory, excessive theft or breakage of inventory may be responsible. Likewise, if operating expenses are relatively high compared to similarly sized stores, city officials should look at stores with low operating expenses for ideas as to how they might operate more efficiently. Table 3 Summary of 1996 Liquor Store Operations On -Sale and Off -Sale 1995 1996 Number of Cities 162 158 6 Amount Amount Percent of Sales 1996 Amount Amount 1995 1996 Sales $ 55,855,276 $ 56,442,420 100.0% 100.0% Cost of Sales 33,333,745 34,158,840 59.7% 60.5% Gross Profit 22,521,531 22,283,580 40.3% 39.5% Operating Expenses 20,555,358 19,954,187 36.8% 35.4% Income from Operations 1,966,173 2,329,393 3.5% 4.1% Nonoperating Revenues 1,673,073 1,597,229 3.0% 2.8% Nonoperating Expenses 277,202 258,716 0.5% 0.5% Net Income Before Transfers 3,362,044 3,667,906 6.0% 6.5% Transfers to Other. City Funds 3,3 00,789 3,5 46,181 - - Off -Sale Only Stores 1995 1996 Number of Cities 93 94 Amount Amount 1995 1996 Sales $ 108,324,419 $ 117,961,934 100.0% 100.0% Cost of Sales 82,630,959 89,940,870 76.3% 76.2% Gross Profit 25,693,460 28,021,064 23.7% 23.8% Operating Expenses 17,563,777 18,371,609 16.2% 15.6% Income from Operations 8,129,683 9,649,455 7.5% 8.2% Nonoperating Revenues 1,266,883 1,307,791 1.2% 1.1% Nonoperating Expenses 281,888 250,434 0.3% 0.2% Net Income Before Transfers 9,114,678 10,706,812 8.4% 9.1% Transfers to Other Citv Funds 8,568,057 7,301,962 - -- Total City Liquor Stores 1995 1996 Number of Cities 255 252 6 Amount Amount 1995 1996 Sales $ 164,179,695 $ 174,404,35 100.0% 100.0% Cost of Sales 115,964,704 124,099,710 70.6% 71.2% Gross Profit 48,214,991 50,304,644 29.4% 28.8% Operating Expenses 38,119,135 38,325,796 23.2% 22.0% Income from Operations 10,095,856 11,978,848 6.1% 6.9% Nonoperating Revenues 2,939,956 2,905,020 1.8% 1.7% Nonoperating Expenses 559,090 509,150 0.3% 0.3% Net Income Before Transfers 12,476,722 14,374,718 7.6% 8.2% Transfers to Other Citv Funds 11.868.846 10 848.143 6 Table 6 Analysis of Metropolitan Area City Liquor Store Operations - 1996 Transfers Gross Profit To /(From) Foot- Popu- Cost Percent Operating Non - operating_ Net Other Name of City Type of Store notes latlon Sales of Sales Amount of sales Expenses Income Revenues Expenses Income Funds Anokp qff Sale Only 17,693 52,539,825 $1,927,321 S612,304 24.1% $403,480 $208,$24 524,66$ ;; $233,492 $70,000 Apple Valley Off Sale Only 41,578 4,009,624 2,986,763 1,022,861 25.5% 768,196 254,665 26,798 - - -- 281,463 135,0110 tlioldyn CrrrYlef tNf;S�Ic Qnlp, 2$ 502 .;, 2,830,307 2,137,b39 692,64$ '! 24.3 °h 32!,691 157,957. 11,461 :9,598 169,840 100,000 Columbia Heights Off Sale Only 18 6,011,907 4,774,908 1,236,999 20.6% 880,994 356,005 46,018 -_ -- 402,023 285,321 Eden :97,$411 'Prptnta O ;v OW 4,81 ];20$ 3.63 . 1,161,226 .: 24.1 ° /p 860,530 si 28ti 69b 11,827 !! 2,19ti 290,327 300,000 Edina Off Sale Only 47,029 6,399,235 4,813,863 1,585,370 24.8% 989,910 595,460 - - -- 612 594,848 500,000 F>rrR ngtoA Ott Sala Only 8,77Q , ,'' 1,349,865 1 433,3.12 6b 373 " " 2b.2 °! °.. 292,049 74,324 2,766 77,o9R 24,039 Fridley Off Sale Only 28 267 3,071,737 2,424,824 646,913 21.1% 503,678 143,235 66,599 - - -- 209,834 75,000 Lakeville ''. „gffsela Oa I ; , ;;'.! I .54 002 : !'' 5,299;$4 4,Q17,639 1;282,204 24.2 °t 873,504 408,700 :. 43,847 43;844 406,703 381,998 Lexington Off Sale Only 2,237 1,825,889 1,484,908 340,981 18.7% 196,433 144,548 10,831 - -- 155,379 101,000 }(found pfFP41. h�1y " ., ;1' !I !; 9 ;?' 1,52];89? 1.143,974 ', ;J77923 " 24,8 °l0 213,867 144;434 13,491 .... 177, 173,850 Richfield Off Sale Only 34,672 7,344,538 5,686,188 1,658,. 350 22.6% 1,019,900 638,450 81,649 15,066 705,033 545,670 Robbjnsdala Qt}:,¢c O#1 SiQ . 11] #4,195 . 1,736,937 "" 1,270,481 " :A86,4S6 '':? 27.7 471,226 ;' 15,230 41,160 -= 56,390 90,000 Rogers On & Off Sale 1,364 823,448 342,631 280,817 34.1% 258,412 22,404 2,304 - - -- 24,708 Sav Q e a e +Dsa1 t►1' I' 13 #5z X 2,18166b l,bS,371 316,095 !':" * 23.7 °l0 376,975 139,122 24,203 ? - - -• 163,321 103,200 Shorewood Off Sale Only 6 1,705,040 1,362,986 342,054 20.1% 374,876 (32,822) 5,902 1,483 (28,403) - - -- Spr10B +i'fI UU : �# ?IYI! l iill;lLh,Ilil!ii I;� I ; f6 + 74 � .. 0 ; 30� 2. 40,Q4 ?tit ?,465 L. 20.9% l :,467,147,.'; 11031Q 128,67¢ 1$,942 260,052 135,000 St. Anthony On & Off sale 8 400 3,i49,887 2,306,160 1,043,727 29.4% 1,063,670 (19,943) 49,320 9,375 20,002 65,000 I 4 N SL $rinol� ::I!, L'ul na�R ONIX ' :!. ";' .y ! ; I' ? 3 ,491 ,: `, :. !47,542 : 418,b24 128,9Y $ , :' ' 23.3 °fo 146, 448 22.430 2,442 • •- 24,$92 8,250 W Watertown On & Off Sale 2,586 570,828 341,321 229,307 40.2% 169,713 59,794 10,825 - - -- 70,619 164,900 yz Qf1 56�¢ I ,;; I II I!, �'' 1 ! ' „II ! x,027 ;;' Wa ;,Nla 2,410,058, 1,s #6,808 893,250 37.1'Y 725,680 ? 147,370 ;' 29,787 31,536 171,821 100,000 1'I IUl l tll'`II i ll II I 1 i ;: 111111�1111;�1'1 IIi11I 1.1111111 ",. : ip11 , ; ,I L QI1Sw � IIIJII:is. oil:: Ll :u!V.:513,x4 .:,.�s4,481,b4d :aI;I H.N929b4 5.12,!88,484:.; y '.,..., o 23.1Io "88,872,1F96 i, $3, ?1f,988 SsOl,2U2 :' 8` 84,127,444 S2,938,348 III Il:it ilI111 �1 1111I,'ll'�IIIIII 1 L:. 1:1..:1:,!1.14 I.. I:a:a:. BQ, ?1''! .:� i .,,; .: . „ 52,933,737 :' ' 32,2° 5 2,!188,701 II': $24x;0 '5137,39b 530,911 $347,741 5419,9Q0 ...•::.: :54,111,155 ;56,1T7;4Q1 1" . il 'r,ll llx l'I li !;' 41 ilu 4 hl y pl f ill( I ,i, I 1 II i ' I r p { r �q p�f u, 4 � ,11i,I:IIIuI1 o:.,l:lunalul lL,,.nL;:!ull:o �l h1:11:6.1u;:. 1 111111 11141 T, g 7!41, r� 548, ?QrR43, 513;322 .;' , ; ?4,4'Yo 511161,347 S3,961,Q44 .. $634JIll:I'' ,504,652 $4,470,494 $3,358,248 Footnotes. 101 Cash basis of reporting. 1 Misoonlinaed part or all of operations in 1996. Jun 20 98 05:03a CERES ENVIRONMENTRL 612- 425 -5636 Ceres Environmental Services Job # 1556 City of Shorewood Storm Damage Clean Up Larry Brown Director of Public Works City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 TutaL6 Grinding #1 Hours Unit Price 51 , 20/98 2.5 400 1000 5,'21/98 6 400 2400 51 , 22/98 1 400 400 526/98 6 400 2400 Mobilization 1 500 500 Grinding #2 6/6198 6 400 2400 6/8198 10.5 400 4200 6/9/98 9 400 3600 61 , 10/98 6.5 400 2600 61i 11 /98 4 400 1600 Mobilization 1 500 500 Loader w/ Operator Loading Mulch 6/ 5.75 85 488.75 6/11/98 9 85 765 Mobilization 1 300 300 Hauling Truck #1 618/98 11 85 935 6/9/98 14.5 85 1232.5 6110/98 14.5 85 1232.5 6/11/98 14,5 85 1232.5 6112/98 6 85 510 Truck #2 6/9/98 3.5 85 297.5 6i 10/98 15 85 1275 6111 /38 15 85 1275 6/12/98 11 85 935 Truck #3 6/9/98 8 85 680 6 /10 198 15-5 85 1317.5 6/11/98 11.25 85 956.25 6i 12/98 13 85 1105 Total: Grinding , Hauling and Loading $ 36,137.50 TY-Y)e- p.2