The URL can be used to link to this page

041398 CC Reg AgP ~-,- >.,~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1998 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. Residents along Strawberry Lane have been invited to meeting with .Council members and staff from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. to discuss improvements to the street. The Board of Review will reconvene from 7:00 p.m. to 7 :30 p.m. to consider the Assessor's recommendations. The City Council will meet in Executive Session immediately following the regular portion of the meeting to discuss pending litigation matters. AGENDA 1 . CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg_ Stover ___ McCarty _ Q'Neill_ Garfunkel_ B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Minutes March 16, 1998 (Att.-#2A Minutes) B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 23, 1998 (Att.-#2B Minutes) C. City Council Work Session Minutes March 30,1998 (Att.-#2Cl & 2 Minutes) 3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. A Motion Establishing Arbor Day Celebration - Saturday, April 25 at 9:00 a.m. at Manor Park B. A Motion to Establish a Public Information Meeting on Stormwater Management Plan - May 6, 1998 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. C. A Motion to Approve an Agreement with Griffin Company for Authorization to Market Liquor Store Property at Waterford Center (Att.-#3C Proposed Agreement) D. A Motion.to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for T.R. 7 Access Closures & Intersection Improvements (Att.-#3D Proposed Resolution) E. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for Emergency Vehicle Preemption Equipment (Att.-#3E Proposed Resolution) F. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for County Road 19/ Country Club Road Traffic Signal (Att.-#3F Proposed Resolution) e\rY".COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 13, 1998 PAGE 2 OF 2 4 . MATTERS FROM mE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5 . REVIEW OF 1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRIENDS OF THE SOUTHSHORE CENTER (Att.-#5 Annual Report) 6. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 903 - WATER USE & SERVICE AND A RESOLUTION ON WATER POLICY A. A Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 903 of the Municipal Code - Water Use & Service (Att.-#6A Proposed Ordinance) B. A Motion to. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Publication of a Summary Ordinance (Att.- #6B Proposed Resolution) C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing Water Connection Policies (Att. -#6C Proposed Resolution) 7. CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT NO. 95-17 - STRAWBERRY LANE RECLAMATION A. Review Comments Received at the Informal Meeting Held from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (Att. -#7 A Written Correspondence) B . AMotion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans, Specifications and Estimates For Project No. 95-17 - Strawberry Lane and Authorizing Advertisement For Bid (Att.-#7B Engineer's Memorandum & Proposed Resolution 8 . DISCUSSION WITH OWNER OF FLOOR'S PLUS INC. (Att.-#8 Letter Dated 3/23/98) 9 . REPORT ON APRIL 6, 1998 WORK SESSION DISCUSSION A. A Motion Regarding Park / Trail Survey Questions (Att.-#9A Final Draft) B . A Motion Regarding the Establishment of Neighborhood Organizations and Direction to Staff C. Announcement of Planning Commissioner's Resignation and Direction to Staff on Plan to Fill Vacancy 10. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS A. . Staff Report on Development Monitoring B. Administrator's Report on Excelsior Chamber of Commerce Membership (Att.-#10B Administrator's Memorandum) C. Report on Shoreline Messages Received (Att.-#lOC Messages Received) D. Report on Permit for A Lapointe Sign Co. (on behalf of Nail Gallery), Waterford Shopping Center & Ratification of Approval . 11. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Report on Police Coordinating Committee Meetings 12. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Att.-#12) M'. " , " I , f i i f l . .- CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.net/shorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Meeting Monday, April 13, 1998 \ \ .J.. ;,1 v The evening starts at 6:00 p.m. with an open forum for Strawberry Lane area residents to discuss the proposed street project. Immediately following the Strawberry Lane open forum at 7: 00 p . m ., the Council will reconvene as the Board of Review to consider the assessor's recommendations. The regular City Council meeting will convene at 7:30 p.m. Agenda Item #3A: This motion establishes April 25 as Arbor Day in Shorewood. Date selection is done by formula previously established. Agenda Item #3B: This motion will establish a public forum for citizens to discuss individual storm water problems with staff from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 6. If another date or time is preferred, this item should be removed from the consent agenda. Agenda Item #3C: This motion would authorize a contract with Griffin Companies to act as an agent for the Waterford Liquor Store property. Agenda Item #3D, E & F: These resolutions authorize special engineering services for: D) State Trunk Highway 7 access closures and intersection improvements, E) emergency vehicle preemption equipment, and F) County Road 19/Country Club Road traffic signal. These projects are authorized in the Capital Improvement Program. Agenda Item #5: Bob Gagne, Chair of the Friends of the Southshore Senior Community Center, will be present to give a brief annual report. Agenda Item #6: The public hearing on the ordinance amending the municipal water code and a resolution changing the water policy is scheduled to begin at 7:30 p.m. There are three separate actions involved: 1) amend the code. 2) authorize publication of a summary, and 3) to establish water connection policies. Agenda Item #7: The Council should report on what they heard at the public information meeting held just before the Council meeting regarding Strawberry Lane street project. Given all written and oral citizen communication, the Council may wish to adopt a resolution approving plans. specifications and estimates and authorizing advertisement for bid. Should the Council determine that changes are necessary, appropriate direction should be given to staff by motion._ "'7 ~) 'II '!!iT CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1998 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1 . CONVENE CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg_ Stover McCarty _ O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda 2 . DISCUSSION WITH CITY ATTORNEY OF PENDING LITIGATION MA TTERS 3. ADJOURN .s"'\~ ",,"~,<ll~./'.,~ , ~ ~'[t.(D BOARD OF REVIEW CITY OF SHOREWOOD MONDAY, APRIL 13,1998 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1 . RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg_ Stover McCarty _ O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A Motion to Approve the Board of Review Meeting Minutes of April 1 , 1998 (Att.- #2 Minutes) 3. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING CITY ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS (Att.-#2 Assessor's Report) 4. ADJOURN TO REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING STEP 1: STEP 2: STEP 3: STEP 4: STEP 5: IF You WISH To ApPEAL YOUR ESTIMATED MARKET V ALUE OR CLASSIFICATION You should fIrst try to collect information about properties similar to yours that have sold. If this information indicates the valuation or classification is incorrect, you should call your assessor (473-1844) within fIve days of receipt of valuation notice from the County to discuss your situation. Many times questions or concerns can be addressed in advance of Local Board meetings. Local Board of Review: If, after discussing this information with the assessor, you still feel you have reason to appeal, you may appear before the Local Board of Review. Please call your assessor first, an appointment may be necessary. At the Local Board of Review, you will be given an opportunity to give testimony. The Board will either make a decision or refer the matter to the assessor for review. If your matter was referred to the assessor for further review, a recommendation will be mailed to you prior to the reconvened meeting of the Local Board of Review. If you agree with this recommendation, you do not need to appear again before the Board. If you do not agree, you may pledge your case further before the Local Board or continue on the County Board of Equalization. County Board of Equalization: To be eligible to appear before the County Board of Equalization, you must first appear before the Local Board of Review. If you wish to appeal the decision of the Local Board of Review to the County Board of Equalization, you must schedule an appointment. The County Board of Equalization will begin meeting on June 15, 1998. All appointments for the county Board of Equalization must be scheduled before June 8, 1998 by calling 348-5076. State law also provides that a property owner can appeal to the Minnesota Tax Court. For information on the Tax Court please contact the Tax Court Office, Minnesota Judicial Center, 25 Constitution Ave., 81. Paul, MN 55155. All appeals to the Tax Court must be made ON OR BEFORE March 31 of the year in which the tax is payable. Also note: Income and expense data, on income producing properties, must be filed with the assessor within sixty (60) days of fIling a petition. 4/8/9/< <<f9 CITY OF SHOREWOOD BOARD OF REVIEW WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING DRAFT 1. Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, McCarty, O'Neill and Garfunke1; City Assessor Rolf Erickson; and Executive Secretary / Deputy Clerk Teri Naab. Review Agenda B. Mayor Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded, to amend the agenda moving item # 5 before #3. Motion passed unanimously. 2. PRESENTATION BY CITY ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, explained the work of the city assessor is guided by state law. Mr. Erickson explained the job of the city assessor is to value each property every year at market value and to correctly classify the property. Mr. Erickson stated in the City of Shorewood bungalows increased approximately 10%, commercial property approximately 5%; some residential parcels were reduced, and the Christmas Lake area and the Islands had the largest increases. Overall1akeshore properties for the entire City were increased an average of 10.8%. Mr. Erickson explained any resident requesting a revaluation will need to set an appointment for the assessor to view the home. At that point, a recommendation will be made to the Board. In the event a property owner is not satisfied with the valuation of their property, they may fIle an appeal with the County Board of Equalization. A property owner may also file in Tax Court at any time up until March 31, 1999, on this value. 5. EST ABLISH DATE FOR BOARD TO RECONVENE Mayor Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded, to reconvene the Board of Review at 7 :00 p.m. on April 13, 1998. Motion passed 5/0. 3. TESTIMONY BY RESIDENTS William B. Wicka, 27930 Smithtown Road, PID 31-117-23 34 0001, stated his value was reduced by the County Board last year from $720,000 to $695,000. This year his value is $746,000. He felt that was too much of an increase. Jeff Aschenbeck, 6050 Chestnut Court, PID 36..117-23 44 0023, stated there was a recent sale of a neighboring house exactly like his but with a [mished basement for $190,000. . His value for 1998 is $198,000 and in 1997 it was $187,000. He felt this to be unfair. He noted he had a recent appraisal, which O'Neill asked to see a copy of. Stover questioned why there would be such a discrepancy. -",,- ,. BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES APRIL 1, 1998 - PAGE 2 Erickson stated he would have to review his files and the property. Dennis Jabs, 20915 Radisson Road, PID 35-117-23 11 0081, handed out a comparison sheet (Exhibit B). He explained upon review of statistics for the area, he found the average increase for the past four years, based upon MLS information, for the lake area has been 16.12% whereas his was 48.04%. He did not feel that sales of lakeshore property warranted the huge increase they have seeing in market value. Erickson explained entry level lake shore properties are selling close to $300,000, and he felt the values reflected the current market conditions. O'Neill asked the assessor to supply a 12 year history of this property along with his recommendation. Pat McDavitt, 21125 Christmas Lane, PID 35-117-23 44 0005, stated in 1997 his value was $515,000, and in 1998 $595,000, which is an $80,000 increase. He noted the land is valued at $460,000. His lot is 1.5 to 2 acres with 160' lakeshore. However, there is a steep slope from the house to the lake, and the property is split by a driveway. He felt a good compromise would be $420,000 for the land valuation. Mark Stageberg, 21075 Radisson Road, PID 35-117-23 11 0079, questioned the 9.2% increase on his property and the Christmas Lake area in general. Erickson responded the Christmas Lake area has been undervalued for some time. This year the concentration was on the southeast area of the City, so consequently property owners in that area are seeing a valuation which reflects the current market trends. Stageberg stated his lot is not very desirable given it is right off Highway 7, city water is not available, the lake is very shallow, and the improvements to the Christmas Lake intersection were not as the area wanted. He said in 1997 his property was $424,000 and in 1998 463,000, which is a 9.2 % increase. Cliff Brandhorst, 27225 Smithtown Road, PID 31-117-23 44 0028, 31-117-23 41 0021 and 0022, explained he owns three parcels which include his residence and vacant property used for agricultural purposes. Farming is how he makes a living. He stated his son would like to take over the farming portion, but cannot consider it given the current rate of taxes on the property. He stated in 1994 the lots were valued at $1,400 and now are $33,000. All parcels together were $191,000 in 1997 and are $244,000 in 1998, which is an 18% increase. McCarty asked if he has considered any of the programs available to limit the value. Erickson explained one must have 10 acres to qualify for the green acres classification. Garfunkel explained the City is currently looking into various tools available to homeowners with regard to land conservation. He suggested Brandhorst contact Dean Riesen to discuss these options. ," BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES APRIL 1, 1998 - PAGE 3 Erickson explained the property is currently classified as agricultural. There is only one other parcel in the City used for agricultural purposes. He stated this parcel was overlooked last year due to the necessity to hand calculate the valuation, so in essence, the owner has gotten a bargain. He reminded them if the property owner went to the County with this appeal, the value might be increased. He also noted that should the owner decide to dedicate this land as a conservation easement, this procedure is permanent. Jeff Fox, 5270 Howards Point Road, PID 30-117-23 44 0009, provided a handout reflecting the land valuations for the west end of Howards Point Road (Exhibit C). He noted this material had been provided to the Assessor previously for reference. He stated he was representing his property and the three neighboring properties. He stated he purchased his prop~rty in 1985, after it had been on the market for 11 months, for $222,000. In 12 years he has witnessed a 230% increase to $504,000. He has been denied a permit for an addition to the current residence due to the lot size and amount of hardcover. Fox indicated if need be he would pay for an appraisal of all four properties to show the assessor. Rod Helling, 26000 Shorewood Oaks Drive, PID 32-117-23 44 0022, stated he closed on this house in April, 1997 for $219,000. He submitted a comparison sheet (Exhibit D). The house has recently been appraised at $220,000. He noted his value is higher than neighboring parcels on better lots. He felt this to be unfair, in spite of the fact that his home is new construction. The 1998 value is $228,000. Kelly Rogers, 20960 Radisson Road, PID 35-117-23 11 0015, stated her property value has increased 33% over the past 6 years even though they are not on the lake, do not have water available and the house was built in 1920. This year they realized a 9.23% increase to $160,000. O'Neill suggested she supply the Board with history of the valuation since purchase. Mayor Dahlberg asked the Assessor to supply the Board with historical data for all properties in question for the reconvened meeting. Roy D. Wegner, 21055 Radisson Road, PID 35-117-23 11 0080, stated he felt the methodology used to evaluate parcels is not good. Erickson explained that in addition to reviewing sections of the City every year, they also take into consideration a set of facts for each parcel, the grade of construction, and trends in the market He noted they use methods prescribed to them by law. Ray Barton, 5915 Christmas Lake Road, PID 35-117-23 42 0020, stated his value has gone up 14% over the past two years. His land is valued. at $240,000 even though his lake shore is inferior. He felt the land should be valued at $150,000. He noted he has a great view of Highway 7. John Hung, 20885 Radisson Road, PID 35-117-23 11 0011, stated his valuation has increased 12%, which he felt was high but not unreasonable. He was present to show solidarity with his neighbors. He questioned the entire process. Mayor Dahlberg explained the current process and how the Board can reduce the value of those appealing, but the total amount reduced cannot exceed 1 % of the entire valuation of the City, and the Board cannot make aggregate adjustments. Hung said he felt the Board has been very respectful and thanked them for their time. BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES APRIL 1, 1998 - PAGE 4 ~ , Mike McDonald, 4695 Lagoon Drive, PID 30-117-23 31 0004. He did not speak. Frank Fallon, 1050 Holly Lane, PID 35-117-23 44 0007, stated his land value had increased 25% from $328,000 to $410,000. He reminded the assessor that the house is over 100 years old and could be considered a detriment to the property. He felt the cost to remove it and the other accessory buildings should be subtracted from the total value in order to determine the true market value of the property. He noted several real estate professionals have opined the property is worth up to $500,000. He felt that would be a fair assessment. Written Appeals Received: Letters from the following residents who were unable to attend the meeting were received by the Board of Review: Property Owner Maud Wadsworth David Greer Robert Carr Amy K vilseth Arno Windsor Betty Norton Ron Johnson Address 5460 Howards Point Road 5185 Shady Island Road 6080 Sierra Circle 4980 Shady Island Circle 4940 Sussex Place 23730 McLain Road 5355 Shady Hills Circle 4. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO ASSESSOR PID 31-117-23 11 0005 30-117-23420008 36-117-23430023 30-117 - 23 24 0005 25-117-23230057 34-117-23230030 36-117-23 11 0001 25-117-23440049 Mr. Erickson explained any property in which reconsideration was requested will be reviewed. If a site visit has been made within the past two years, it may not be necessary to physically visit the site again. A recommendation will then be made to the Board. In the event a property owner is not satisfied with the valuation of their property, an appeal may be filed with the County Board of Equalization. An appeal may also be filed in Tax Court at any time up until March 31, 1999, on this valuation. Mayor Dahlberg stressed the fact that the fee appraisal system used may not provide the necessary data and can be very subjective. He felt comparables should be used to determine the validity of the market value in the case of an appeal. 5 . ESTABLISH DATE FOR BOARD TO RECONVENE This item was acted on following #2, above. BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES APRIL 1, 1998 - PAGE 5 6. ADJOURN McCarty moved, Stover seconded to adjourn the Board of Review at 9:23 p.m. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, Teri Naab, Executive Secretary / Deputy Clerk ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 'DIe !IIH~."- . ., i, i t f ''''JtJ.n, 2, 1991-AJlnr-. . Ifll[ llPII 0. "'1, 1991 by I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .1 I I I I TABLE OF CDNTENTS 31-117-23-34-0001 WICKA WILLIAM 27930 SMITHTOWN RD 36-117-23-44-0023 ASCHENBECK JEFFREY 6050 CHESTNUT i'T .-, J...! I.. 35-117-23-11-0031 JABS DENNIS 20915 RADISSGN RD ., oJ 35-117-23-44-0005 MC DAVITT J PATRICK 21125 CHRISTMAS LN 4 35-117-23-11-0079 STA6EBERS MARK 21075 RADISSON RD 5 31-117-23-44-0028 BRANDHORST CLIFF .j"1??C: SMITHHiWN RD 6 1.:__101 30-117-23-44-0009 FUX JEFFREY 5270 HOWARDS PT RD 7 32-117-23-44-0022 HELLING RODNEY 26000 SHOREWOOD OAKS DR a 35-117-23-11-0015 ROGERS KELLY 20960 RADISSON RD 9 35-117-23-11-0080 WEGNER ROY 21055 RADISSON RD 1'1 ..\. 35-117-23-42-0020 BARTON RAYMOND 5915 CHRISTMAS LK RD 'i !. 35-117-23-11-0011 HUNG JOHN 20SS5 RADISSON RD t.; !I.. 30-117-23-31-0004 !'IC DONALD MICHAEL 4695 LAGOON DR "'I ~,j 35-117-23-44-0007 FALLON,JR FRANCIS 1050 HOLLY LN 14 25-117-23-44-0049 JOHNSuN RON 5355 Shady Hills Cir 15 31-117-23-11-0005 WADSWORTH ~ 5460 HOWARDS tiT Ril il; ,1 ,~ .w 30-117-23-42-0008 SREER DA\j:~ 51B5 SHADY ISLAND HD .- 1l 36-117-23-43-0023 CARR ROBERT 6080 SIERRA erR 18 30-117-23-24-0005 KVilLSETH AMY 4980 Shady Island Cir I'::' ;'.1 25-117-23-23-0057 Ii INDSOR ARNe 4S40 SUSSEX PL .",f.. i.\l 34-117-23-23-0030 NORTON BETTY 23730 !'ICLAIN RD 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Bill Wicka ADDRESS 27930 Smithtown Road PID# 31-117-23-34-0001 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $420000 SALE DATE 6-19-95 YEAR BUILT Remodeled 96 STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 100 FF GROSS BLDG. AREA 3400 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 2632 FULL 3 SCREENED Yes GARAGE- ATT. 3/4 OPEN DET. 1/2 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER 3 car # OF BEDROOMS 5 # OF FIREPLACES 1 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE Lower Lake MISe. COMMENTS Lowered to $695,000 by the Hennepin County Board last year. This year's increase is less than the average increase for lakeshore. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LA~ 318000 BUILDING 377000 TOTAL 695000 ASSESSOR R. Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 334000 412000 746000 RECOMME~ COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 - I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I cl I I I -,",", Iii i i -, ~:.:;::~. _c,-..:;:: .- .. .' ... 0 .-~.' {~. ~ ,~ ...' c<, :'~.. '- ':.c,;;:: ::~ :,. - ',.:-',; g., '. " "i.o.~ ~. :'\." "~~,- .... - .. ~I~~ ,;~::,: ".".;. .',;-.' .;;jfi; - -,. " -;: ..~. . c:- -". '. ,:,.; .~ ;'-.;'--.- ". '"'", ~.: .' ; ':'>, a . w ". ..f~. p: .. -- ~"~'~f~,C. .....~ . ::: "c. ~" . ~~ !j ~ft. :"..~_ ii! S~-~~ .. .. .., >~. .~~; '.. .... "Ii I ~ ," tr .: I>~~~~ ... . ;' :' ..'" ,.,','" ~~ ~ ~ '-. ""." : ...~ i~ '.' ',>." '.' '. ..' i.':"~." -- .~:.....: ;~ ~ :. ~:~~"~'. ~..... - . ~t~~ -,. . . '. . :~.... . hI' ".,; '~ti>' " ,~ .,.'- .... ,~.,~~: " ",".~- ." ,. ~.. .' .' '. , " ~""", ....... .. ;,;" '- ';" ~~~ Q\ ''''., ,-:c: ~ ~.;.~ '..~ -". ::~ Z . . :5 . " -:::So :;~ .r.~ , :~ . ..... . L:, .' .4 " ;~~l:. ..... ...~-,...- ., :,:.~~" .. {:. :.'::. '--- ._. - , '[:;; ,~ , '. " - '.. . ~ p: ,,)' , " "'c' ;.~ : ..... '. . ':;. ., .:.; -- ". '1';f'j -~ 112 ~~\" ( .~~~. ',-< ~; ...~... - , .. ':i: ,.... .' ;" .. c.., .. '. ,:.~ '; I:.: .' : . . ,,,:.. .'. . . ""~ It.. . .. .. p:.,. , I~~ :.- :: . . '. b ;: '. .' ~'- <. ":"6 ..- G" .... :~ ,:: .... ':,;\ ~ igz .' :" . ... .:,. ..: .. - '. " ~~ ,.~ .. 1.;;,'< ,,' .} J "". .~ , i ":,, ; ';.' L;>.. ",,,,- . .< ::;-;:--.;::c:: .".'" y'''': "'.:''':'''''''':'''''''':.' - .~.. " '.' ~ ..;0 "'40 '<:'1 -C\ 0 ~ .\} .~ >.() ":) r\ ~ -:t~. M .!: " -'.;:) '.< Q ("\ 0 .,,> () ;::() .,-a ..'~ Un ^ ::,;~~. ~ -..... .. .', . ", .. .-... ...l{'I '.1) i..J 2\ " ('f;. c"' "'. Q <), ~ ., .... " ,,, ...U""' "'~ ~ - ~ .- '. ';if .:(Y) (t' 'COL) ...:9 :>0 .",... "00 :.\ .~ \Q ..9 ~ .- ~ b' :-e 1'-(: N ~ :'r 'l.r:s ,~ .. .q-. + ~. ...,;...; .. ... " " ... " .. " .....~ .., ",. ,'\ r-r: ...()C "- ~n t:: ~~: -" -. -."., . p. "'. \T ~'. " ~ ;. " .. ,..() ....~ Q ~ 0 p " o~!r'o. ...1 '" ':0 0- ....., ~~ ~ .- .':0.,;....>_ q;) .SJ () ~ 0 () _. .9 {') '0. ~: .~ ..,'.~ '. "' -- .. .. w. n .- '1;. .....1 p: ~ ..~ .F'"' N (t': to ~ (' ::::: ,., ~ 0 '0; 'i\ .~~ < ...:' "I .:) -;J'"" ....~ I"':::::; ~ \) ~ "~ :t\ .~ ~ ~ .~ '. : .. '. .. .~ .. .;- . "-' " <C1 N - ........ ~. ~ .c' .~ '~ , ..... . . .";...... - - .~ t .~4...-;. . '. -' ~ ~~0'::; ...,... :- - I- ....... .\" ~ ('( ~ * :~~1%: :* -.~-..... .., - , ..... "".() vD ~ ~ () ~ .- 1M .0 OJ 0 ~;~: -' ;"" " " ~ .' .. ,,: ....., ~.;.:' ~ :;<:: ,;Q ."<:: \ij {.) () ,n -~ 0 iOj Q ::~~ , .. ..... I .'.<:>.:..... .. ..""'- ...) . :".: ".-'~ "tit: .~ .~ ....::> 0 ~ .~ 0 -OJ .,?:!,~ ~cl_ .. .. ...) 0 ~ 0 z '. ~ - ,';;0 '~,: '_"='I "OJ I Dc"1 0 c:- o '. -- ..;()Q '.'~ .~~ ;, .,.'t4". " 0 ~ ~::. Il() Ill\.' ~ -<:,::,-'. ~r4._'. ~.', .- 0 ~ .~. . 0< () -..9 .:r \.~ ....... .~ U ~~:: ~. ., .'",.~ . 0 ~ ~ :..>':.~. ':) 0 .:..... .t() ,. c ~ ,? .....~ .('J I\"'( N c6 .C\ ~ .~ 1..l'0 M Pl ..\'W) ':1iN', ~ ~ c:r: 11"\ "~:-'. ~ 11"\ , ,':-< .:: . ..' " '. '~: I r...... if~~;~ . JZ 'p:." (1.).... ..,~, '..y;'" '''''''1 l'/") J~ ,....;.:.~.~ ' "~"" . .. -. , '? N .. .. .. .. '. ';;:'~"'~:" " ; ~ I- Z ,1T( i;:1~ . ~ i ,.., ::r: :E: '. .' ./j ~ !) I- -J .: ..": i ~ ~% c:r: ~~~~; "'. ~'~- ..; :.:.. i I 0 . i ~ 04C1) ~ !"" ~ '. N"" ..: . ........:. .~ ~ " ~ J CI) - ..~ '0 .-@. ..('() ~ " ClII -= ". ~~ ~"".': ~o ...J .... ~ , ~ :~ I.LI ~:~ ...... 9. ".'(S" ~ ; <r' ...... .n ....... u "'0 c'" T .. .'" ~ .. 1 "0 ~,.., )( }:-:, ..", : N ltN I.LI Sz ,.0. ~.~ X. .;).: )( x {~ X -o~ " ." .....?'" " ~ .., " '.' .. ... ',',"~.:'~' ~'~:::! < '. ~...._'" .Y" ., . .' ....- 1 A ,'~"'" ~;~:(-",.:.. . . ~~", ,D> .;..:..,' ..,:.. '''.''~..:':~; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Jeffrey Aschenbeck ADDRESS 6050 Chestnut Court PID# 36-117-23-44-0023 PROPERTY TYPE ~ SALE PRlCE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1987 STORY HGT, 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 14000 GROSS BLDG. AREA 1828 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR AREA 958 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE- ATT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN Yes DET, 1/2 1 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 2 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKESHORE None MISC. COMMENTS See sales book page 44 for a larger house with a larger lot and finished basement. See also page 51 for a three-bedroom larger home on a larger lot. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LA}ij) 54000 BUILDING 133000 TOTAL 187000 ASSESSOR T. Carroll 1998 PAY 1999 62500 133500 196000 RECOMME}ij) COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4-4-98 2 ,---- ~"i' ~~FFR~~-11ri~~ ;;C;;;~:CK 6050 CHESTNUT CT SHOREWOOD MN 55331 - ----..- - - PROP SCH . TYPE DIST WS . Sale Date Sale Date Sale Date Sale Date _ __._____________________...nu __ ___.__,._. ~ ~R 'Z.1"" .t:~ . . J ~}~ Rom..'" + ~1JJ5db HMSTD YEAR % OWN SR YES NO 19 ..,.. AI; ~,., X Ri y if9 X go , _,v ?I. '1 C) ~'Z .} X ql ^ q;;. X 13 ';( 1~ X q.< 'f. 9~r 'i t: (" ,Y (.} (, 'j. <;7 'K qg (1)wY'JJU it I' /,u j LAND STRUCTURE .I :.:') J() -\)(\:):::. CilJ .L.'.'})' ",' I ( d,:.<l:: Ifv'-I i J. ,) HMSTD YEAR % OWN SR YES NO 19 J , I TOTAL MARKET 1"tJ 0 2.1 "e:; - 0 iq...... - () I 4 I :s 0 ~. 4- 2 00 0 , 0 7 ,'\ 0 D I ,4 9 'j 0 0 4 Z -, b 1 ( q 8 ::>,:) (to I ~ ~ ~ 3 cr" r':::) I I 0, 8 0 ~ } ,.:) G::( 8 :J D -S5 D () 0 I IJ :1 rt 0 0 I 5 1 ~ D ~~ fit \ V J J i'l 5 b l) , 5"3 t;.o 0 LI,S-OOD' /&,000 J{,,/ noC 1~~~ooll~oOO 173o~D t..4ooo '2.1000 \ 0,1000 hi~~oOIZ~sO~/ ?Q30? ~f~on/~1~~~.J~7DOO h-t..OOO J2Sooo J <gtj 000 15~0::;O /33Co0 18,OC;(J \..~2S0C '3350:) 'l'tbOOO. . . "" ~'. ,.-,:. .' I. ., i.' .,,';"' '., . I '" ,X/i) ,;-( .",.. ,.,. I'" ", '.. .,.. ::U '.' 'lLii; ..!:h:,.:;;.,;.,.;.A~'..I..' '" I'; '; > I:'.> ') ,,',,1.-:,:, :\ :,,:.,;,; ~.;' :';;~ ;i: '!:, .....':'1.>. '., ~J: l:;'.'i, "?;,;~.t~:t(. li~;\: :,.. .. \':/1 '..,' .' ~ l.";~,': . ~ .J.,._. 11:'? '". , ",' . _ :, . "'. ~J{..,!.. , I Jl,;. ;,,"'. :....<,.. '.ij'.~<~,?j.:;r' ", _ I",!}~:;::,::, .~t: I'i"" . ", ",.' ~.. :_.'; t'L '~ l;'~,' ':",~ f;.h'",,',' }! ,\:L. ~}- 1t'f...t~ ,fr~':~', :'I1Jff;#\ \:';'''ft;I~f-~,~t:I~~. 1::Jtt-:':;. f1{ '(<I"" .::., ,~,';i.,;.:~ ,;~~'!.~';j;;':;.,~,. .~JJ1liiJJ. il'),' i.1 ~, .:;, : Ij'l~~' ,~!'i. \ri. 1.11. "., H$ 'U ~~, ;w: W';I~t:\~ 'i\~ ,~.l .Uh. \,i(~'i""!' ~\","!"" " ,... '.. ;8'.; :......., ',VI..l :.!i,".~...j'-,~' .~'!\:1'~~"'.~':'4" fl'ilKJ1,:; '1;...... .,;;'. .l. . .. ...... ~.t..."....f. "'.J.~; ',' '" ....:' ., ." '. :it.f.~ .. ,,',-,~"'-"~''-''''J. ......"..... '. 1/\,,', ".) ./~~. ..,.,..... LAND -"1 t. . . I !' i~\j' ........- ~..I.j. I uf' <.: I""" I I Amount Amount Amount Amount " STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET " 1'1:' .' I, ". ;tL J.:' ~ '. ....I;;..I.: ; ~~.~. },.i:' /iJ;, lr:~;'; !N: ". ~ April 13, 1998 Mr. And Mrs. Ra)'Dl8ndBart. 5915 Christmas IakeR"" Shorewoed. MN 55331 Dear M,. And IIrs.Barton, Thank you for the ..........iIy to wew yea, lJeaatifll. .....e. After doin. extensive research I ha_come up With a wallie _ your h..e. You have DIa.IIy niee features and great wiews, .....e.., not all of these features add a dellar value. I hawe taken.any COIDpar""e hORles and addell anti suldraded features toeetne lip with a IllreasoDable"price for your ho.e. Market co....i.s and lDarket tilDe definitely playa part. Your h..e....... sell better in the spring and su..., ..nths due to, your wiews, etG. Unfortunately your lalteshereisn't a great plus due to lbe fact that there is no beadl. What I"ad to do was Gall it Illlakeaooess". Most buyers when lookin. at lakeshorewant a beaeh for swi..i.... There aftlllany areas thathawe dedls. availald. for lbe Itotne....ers, SOlD. with wiews, whiellis the category' had to put you in. As you know, the value of your h....e is what SOllleon. is willing to pay for it. After oeraainat the h....es that are attached your salepriee ....Id... $523,961.50. Your ...........y be a little abowe tIIis priee ....t unf....unately not 1DUdI.. I would list )'OIIr ......e for top dollar at $549,900..00 ..... would exped it to sell fer ........xilllatety S525,000.00 . 530,000.00. Thank you again for lettin..e see your wonderful....e and I ho... to be of further assistanee to you if you ewer dedde to hawe your ......e seld. ./- Thanks again.. ~- ~4!/~ ..... M. Finkelst.in Realtor/G.R.I./188% CI..../T... Ten tE!WMtX@R..Utts Name OPEN FORUM STRA WBERRY LANE April 13, 1998 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Address ~-O""" ,::) iJY.-:') d ~TfLA''\.V'5 ~L/J.- L/Vi ' r-LlF ...,....., / S U 0S- ":::>T~vJ.15 en I!-- -r L A-i . . 'STATE OF MINNESOTA County of Hennepin City of Shorewood We, the undersigned, Board of Review - *Equalization - of the Ci ty of Shorewood in said County, do hereby certify that we, and each of us, attended at the office of the Shorewood Clerk on the Fi rst day of Apri 1 , 19~. Theday se forth in the notice given by the Clerk. and in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 2.74.0t ~ade changes in the 19~ Assessment as e tered in e following form(s). Witness our hands this ~ da~i of tJ#. Ll ,19_ . .:v. ( Chair ) ~ . . He ill (p.l) *Applies only to Cities whose Charters provide for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review. m - ................................................................. ................... ::::::::Eiiii~~al:::::::: ............................... .............................. .................... ........................................ - .............................. .............................. .............-........................-.......................... ::::omlla:::::: itif.~: .............................. .............................. .................................................................................................................................. '1"11,1111: :::tiiaiiiiMii::: =::?eiiIMiiia::::::: ;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. IIIIIIIIIII:IIIIIIIII:IIIIIIII:III!I:I:IIIIIIIIIIIIIII111IIIII ....................................... ~::j:j::Rt9PiHi::::::: . . :::flEoc~::l::: :t'yp,:: ............................................................. :::~:!::~::m!J:} ;~I~~;I II:::rrtx&Hr::::=I ii::::::.:~~li:..I::~ijl~I..i..:.I::I.!.i::!::.1 ................,...................................................................................................,.,............ .......... .............. ::j::::::::::::::::::::::jl~#.J.i[i;t~i6.:&M~i::::j:I:::::f:::::::::::I:: ..................... :::O~dmt bthi:f, ................... .................... ................... .................... ................... .................... ................... .................... A R A\ () in I(\} j)M~ 2~-11 'l-2~_7 ""_hn~ I"') y A.z )( , AlO C ha~ c..'- -z. ~-4+ 004Q Y R Q R 6 f\) 3""0 \-\ (\) SON 2.S -I If . X N 0 C. h~,('t11 I N LR ~ \I \ I I . 3(,,' t I ..., - 2"3 - I - 00 0 I : }J 0 C h c:.vv-. <.. 12.. l~nyV . 1<MtfrLC)~ t:} tS,\ ~ N ~ d.(P- II-(')()<':' "2- Y IX X c hWAv ~ ~- I 1""7 - 2.. ""3 - .1lJ 0 A t'Y'I '< KI/ A I ~, n-I :5D-/ I ..., -L '3-~4-ooo 5 N R L )( .AJ0 c A~NC-e- ,1'\ I ( HftE l ,'nf'.,J;,....,tlL n '3 o- J , 1 - '2 3- "31- 600 4 Y R L .)( Alo C h f+1A- ~t". j P Prv I 0 6- I\E ~ R =3 0 -/ I ""-2~ -4 2-bOO~ Y R L- X ,IJO C h ft~<- \r- F'FR E: \.,.t' Fa 'X 30- I I 1 -2.3 -44-0 oo<i \' R L )< 0 2- 4c (.) 44'2.1,00 30Ca 1 0 0 \ "3 b 6 0 fYIltV D wJ'+D SW op. TN '3 I - I n - 2 ")-41 -0005 Y R L ~ /LID (". /) A- {\.J 't -e- y R )( '2..32.0 7/2..12.<80 0 v W , t.. 1.- I Am W / C KA 3 I - t I I - 2-3 - 34--000 I L 0 3 34- 0 0 0 '3 8 ~ 80 0 (Lt.. \ \=F P.:lfLAND H oR s -r 31 -\ I , - 2 '3 - 44-007.8 Y Fp x . .v 0 C N A-tu6-f. \ I ? I I I ,- 2- , 4- l- Ob "2- ( Y p- I A.Je? <: H n.... ~ -~ , - x - , 1l -I 1/-2 ?-"\- I - 06 2. 2 V F' X /J () e.- M Pr Nv-~ I \ J R/"\t"\l\.r:::y l-l.~ LL\ ru 6- 32- I 1/- 2. "3- ~4-00 22. '( R X 2440 0 20430~ +200 0 ; ~ 2 3 c D ~C: 11"( NO R. TO 1\J 34- - \ II-l,? -2.'?r 00 30 Y R >c . N v e h Ll.-.t .r.J :to \-\ ~ Ut , 1\.') (r- 3 5 - J II - Z '3- I , - 00 I I Y R L ><. NO CH A-^-}I'.J-~ \<;E LL'1 RO 6-1..n..<; '3 5- I , ..., -2, -II -00 I 5 y' ~ ~ .00 c." hwnCr<.- rY\ A-R \, S-!t' ~~ ~ R. (~ "3 ~ , n"'l.} I \ 007'1 '( R L;. X ,-.it :) .~ "i'; i' C,) A)o C N Pr-Nv- f. I rf .., -"'7 ~.,... ... - - ~ o 1= ~IAIC ur 1f1ll\l1\l~>)UIA County of HennepIn City of P4Q:~ \~..., Shorewood We, the undersigned, Board of ReView - *Equalization - of the City Shore'wood of Shorewood in said County, do hereby certify that we, and each of us, attended at the office of the Clerk on the Firs t day of Apri 1 , 19~. The day se forth in the notice given by the Clerk, and in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 274.0t ~ad"h.ngeS In the 19--.mLAHessmentas e tared In e 10Bowing lonn(s~ Witness our hands this. - np 01 J1.;) : I ~ ' 19~ . '" ( Chair) t: ~ "'1J ~ _35-111-Z 3 -1/ -Oc>'8~ '35-1/7- 3-JI- 0081 35~ln-Z3-42-ao2o y 3 5" -/I7-2.3~44--oo:>S 35-11'1- 2~-44-oob 6~-1 11- 2?;'-24-o01 3G,-I 11- 2,--4 "3-00'23 - (I - '2. ~--14-0() z ~ ,Re.. . RL 'X Rl >< R )( RL .~ RL ~ R X >< \Cf4oo '2..45'\,00 j'2.'2..ooo 54bOO b/3ooo 200000 4 \ 300V 40000 ~5'ooo2ooo'D ., 35'000 55~oo f'iZ2.oo 354700 137500 No ch c.h .. ~.,' ~.~-:t< 04/13/98 14:05 FAX 612 333 2839 JABS GEHRIG & CO Ial 01 Dennis W. Jabs 20915 RadIIiiIan Inn ROIId ShoIeWaod. Min.-Jla 55331 VoIoI NumbeI' (612) 333-2612 Facsllnillll Numbef (812) 3S3-28S9 April 13, 1998 The Mayor and Shorewood City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Coun1Jy Club Road Shorewood. Minnesota 55331 Re: Property Tax Protest Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am unable to attend your meeting tonight, but want to voice a continued coocem regarding my proparty tax assessmenL My concerns were outlined in the handout I provided you at the April 1, 1998 meeting. Since the April 1. 1998 meeting I invited the Assessor through my home and discussed the assessment and comparable sales with him. The assessor's increases appear very arbitrary_I am not convinced the comparable sales support his position. Further I tail to understand why my assessment increases have far exceeded that of my neighbors. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss this matter further. I trust your judgment and will accept whatever decision you make tonight. I do not wish to pursue this matter beyond your decision. Very truly yours, Q;2~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Dennis Jabs ADDRESS 20915 Radisson Road PID# 35-117-23-11-0081 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $N/ A STORY HGT. 1-1/2 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 1794 GROUND FLR. AREA 1196 GARAGE - A IT. 1 car DET. 1 car TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR Yes SALE DATE N/A BSMT. FINISHING BATH - DELUXE FULL 1 3/4 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS 4 WALKOUT Yes YEAR BUILT 1922 30% LOT SIZE 13900 PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK Yes # OF FIREPLACES 1 LAKESHORE 45 ff Christmas Lk MISe. COMMENTS ~e sale on page 101 for property that is bisected by road. See also sale on page 100 for a smaller structure on a larger site. See following page for sale of a remodeled hone on an inferior lot (virtually no actual lake frontage). The sale house had no garage at the time of sale. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LPJNa) 114500 BUILDING 113500 TOTAL 228000 ASSESSOR R. Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COlJNeIL ACTION 143000 No 122000 change 265000 DATE 4/3/98 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 20845 RADISSON RD PID#: 35-117-23-11-0046 SALE PRICE: $ 288,000 YEAR BUILT: 1947 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 1874 GROUND FLR. AREA: 1030 GARAGE #1: # OF CARS: 0 GARAGE #2: # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S) : 2 CENTRAL AIR: SALE DATE: 9603 STORY HEIGHT: 1 1/2 STORY DECK: YES BSMT. FINISHING: 50 % PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: OPEN: BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 2 3/4: 0 1/2: 1 LOT SIZE: 45 FF WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE COMMENTS: INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 3A /""'-,,::"";&" ,.... i )r:,:- ". . .::;C~';~' ,.' ~------------------ : -,j ~/ ?, ...! ~ ~ (1 ~." Iq IJ CJ I -J -;:2 t' ~ " ( ~ n () ~ ~ 14 0 b I 3 '1 z. 0 0 J ~.., u (p.f(O C () I LJ 31Lt () () lCf{oO lo()oo/4C'1fbO 8 3 z 0::) 1 0 eo,:) 115.q 000 ~ ') ;;I (; c. 7 u :.~: () [) J S 3 5 D 0 7'5)1) I)/s~b/~S"GC .UJ.;.. ~~. ~ ~ ~~.~~; ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 8:~"/III.'; ".lAiUU ~~ X ~l-, log 0 p;) I 0 K () 0 0 2 { b ~ () 0 , l!X ~ ~ q 1> ~ 0 0 1 <6 ~ 0 0 I ~ b ~ () () 'I 97 'I4Lsco {(5S002Zr:lcoQ' L X?J1 / " - ~ A / 0 7; u (/ ~ / (, ~ ~ 0 X q~ I If 'J 0 D D J 2 2. 0 0 0 2 b 5 P 0 0 .~; '. . ~ t \ ; x. )( K .. i lut'i,".;t1:".', . '31..'1'''':''' '. . ...... ,iT. " ,t',: ' - _~~ - J "',: :., . .~:_: .,'._ . 26 35-117-23 11 0081 PROP SCH WS Sale Date Amount TYPE DIST DENNIS W & JEANNE M JABS Sale Date Amount . 2 0915 RADISSON RD RL Sale Date Amount SHOREWOOD MN 55331 Sale Date Amount ~ .- Remarks: --... -. +- ---"----- HMSTD YEAR .~ OWN SR YES NO 19 ~ 0 II'Y\P (I'l~) ft(, I tJ 61'-,.0 t!e> .-'"/)- Dt,(.1I t,U: ~ D!O-.'tJ). Is. Z,OD ) TOTAL MARKET y~~ST~O Y~:R "10 OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET LAND STRUCTURE If I/:J ~Y) tBl n <it) ql (lei . I 'j y /,:'~;") "'.., /, . \(lIi\ 1m. ;:b~ '\iQ. ~ ~'1lilA; ,j ,t '(, '. I ~-f ~ ~,J ,,,~,,"J~' :r;! :'i),J :.~7 -, ;:': i, ::;)/:.,. .. .' '... , i ')i:.i,: '. ,f,; !f'),'}! ., ". , " l" I' ., It;. ,... .' ,'. ""co he .$:i ~j.Ji,', (" '.lif Pi;., ,\" i;~ 1~' J., lid .. ... :;,' 1;)\" I ;';\i '; r;' "'i;" ': \' \: .j, .F .... I:'" .... :'.'" ?&tlJ..., .... .".:>,. \'. .. " ' . .,.. d"'.:" ,',1 ..' ')" \.:; ',1; " " ..,.; .... ",".'i)'-'-,. :.'<:'~}1.,;1:,:.'., ...f' ,'c' . . l\: ;,1' "K .: ,c. A: 1'.:.,.1.\ ..:/. ~,.. ';; .:.. .' 'itA: tl1m',' '}i~~f ::~i~ Ii' )i~!) l~'~ .~. 1,~ I!;; ,j/.llx)/ ,il? .:~; ,-,,': ',\ J\ "'\:i~;,: r:::};j Ji};l.' '~;(;,ii\li~'jjiW). "1, Vt.,::.i.:'\' 1"Y'f;'i\~;: :( i~i :,? ',\,' :}. H:~:\'" ,'1,! '.... ,;~'.,. w....... . .ri.",,;. '.il':. "1'" : '" " "': :1', .,.,'. '. f',.,.' ,d ',' Ji'.fl' .',,,. ''''"" ~I'i...,. '.' ::':":,'" , . .. .: .... " .. '.:. .... :.. ..... ',.. '.". .;,, '",!, ..1" .~." .h. ) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ." SlJBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Pat McDavitt ADDRESS 21125 Christmas Lane PID# 35-117-23-44-0005 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $420,000 SALE DATE 12-18-88 YEAR BUILT 1967 STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 80% LOT SIZE 150 ff, 69700 sf GROSS BLDG. AREA 1845 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1845 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE- ATT. 2 car 3/4 2 OPEN DET. 1/2 DECK TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 6 # OF FIREPLACES CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE Yes Christmas Lk MISe. COMMENTS See sale book page 102, house is next door. See following pages for a sale of older, larger house and a smaller house in an inferior lot. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 381500 BUILDING 133500 TOTAL 515000 ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 460000 135000 595000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/2/98 4 .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 5640 COVINGTON RD PID#: 36-117-23-24-0006 SALE PRICE: $ 732,500 YEAR BUILT: 1961 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2495 GROUND FLR. AREA: 2495 GARAGE #1: ATTACHED # OF CARS: 2 GARAGE #2: SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: 199712 1 STORY DECK: YES BSMT. FINISHING: 60 % PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: OPEN: BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 3 3/4: 1 1/2: 0 LOT SIZE: 79,900 SF # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S): 2 CENTRAL AIR: YES WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE BEDROOMS: 5 COMMENTS: INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 4A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 5630 CHRISTMAS LAKE PT PID#: 35-117-23-14-0009 SALE PRICE: $ 685,000 YEAR BUILT: 1968 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2270 GROUND FLR. AREA: 2270 GARAGE #1: ATTACHED # OF CARS: 3 GARAGE #2: # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S): 2 CENTRAL AIR: YES WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE BEDROOMS: 5 COMMENTS: 199710 1 STORY SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: DECK: YES BSMT. FINISHING: PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: YES OPEN: BATH-DELUXE: FULL: 3/4: 1/2: LOT SIZE: 80 % o 2 2 1 23,500 SF INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 4B - -----.- _c"JII!..-~~- ~ :c~.;~.!.h~.'~.; -:.,\,[/._ ~l.#~.~~:Rr.11'1Ji... ~:r~i'~"""'~''''~:':~''~1:~~ 26 35-117-23 44 0005'.'" . . '.'(~'. '.:.... ..'........:\i\..;.~~I... '..).,).,~'.':"~;"~'.)~.":-;r'. ..... \' '~.. . .' '. . . . ~1~~~R~~~1~T::~E~: MCDAVITT .' :.:.',>:.;:.:t,.....)t..;,;/?.,..:;r./...', '. .' . . SHOREWOOD MN 55331 0,. PROP ,~SCH WS' Sa/eOate '7:;$~} . .. TYPE OIST ' i .-? az Cl! ell Sale Date ,--, u ~oCJ ft;.;. ~. 7(, 3 Sale Date Sale Date ~ n \ L.- X X )< X , 'il 'f y.. X- X- ~ 1)( 1117'171~ ~ 1'1 J d:, () tJ I ~ 11_ iIl.~ () J 'Ira 0 () 0 ) ~ a '11 0 ()IV~ .~o 8 () 0 I lJ, I ( 0 0 0 I (1 l/; BOO I '2 Lj. 4 ':;( 0 b I otoco la' 'DO e,,,-:e?Jbo /7?JCO 1/5900 ~q3oo0 '2 e~~lcob I I., 0 rOl40S- cO r d 7 210000 /17(, ()o 38, (peG '.....;..;!....~..,.........,:"...~.....,......I"."....... ~'1 "'. J ,. .. i'" .' '; " . , " . - ,': . ,I ".~ 17 6 D V li"/ I i./ I f: V if ~ b 6 ' '. . . . 2 '17 000 I i 140 () 0 4 I I 00" 32~1001/~0001121QO 1"1 ?OOCJ IZ()ooQ L1b3ooo 13 ., Ole ob I 1.. % 0 D n 'f? r () 0 ~ /-:3el 13~500.5IS000 t B~o~oa}?~oooS95000 HMSTO YEAR YES NO 19 X % OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET - - 9'3 , f"/ I OJ(A ~ <6.1 I Sf> ';'9 :.to '10 .,. J , <13 Cf4 9$ 1L '7 ('g . . Amount. i~2?-!{ J11M : Amount ~ Q_ Amount Amount Remarks: /,{.,o ~~ HMSTD YEAR YES NO 19 % OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKEl II' . ... ~.Iilili.~~laJ.&.hiMtk" ." ~ .-,."":....... . ,'C,, .' , ,. ....:.... ."'. :;'. . '. '.! , , '. ' . . .' ". 1::-/ <,,';;}'l\! ;jH',/,"1 i: :\'1' .' .: '. "":;.:0. ':'':.1 ry.::..,::,'('. '. , ", . 1.'.:'>1.'_ 'ti:: .' ,..... I.r ,',T/:",,: >...,:. ....::. ."":':.~'" i:iil' <r ~i' ..t~~I,i Iii; iifl ~f} f~.{';..I'..li;1X\.._ :~iK ;lf~~', ijfi~1."" ," -:;: :'.:~ ..... ;:"'."" i..'. :,".' '." ";;.... : ". .'. !.~ '. :..::.... .':..'.......;...i"~..... ;:;..\.:.. '.i . :. . til~~~. ;;g~ ; :?'J .it/\t:. ., t..j .t1j, 'ii~\ :'!.' I" _..... " . .:\ ".~ I~t t,i:';l t:~(. ~'" ,'" .... , '; ". ~i, M! ;1+ .~.,'. c,{;,. """;I<.~ Pi ~~, I,:; ....\'~i!.. ~\I. .~i;:f'i-.'i', . :.~.,. . , ., :,.:. \ . l:'-;!i :;lft ..('(. , .' : ,'. 1-B1.fJ. I, !~f :' Ifll .,\ ".," ..\.','r,~ .;;,\ >.\;1'. .{\. Iii\!<: '.1; ~';, I }\.~.. .},)"y .' ' ". ; . i ~ ~ li ~ .'.Iii' ,:; ,- .iiI. "lil. .~ ~. . .... )' ....1 :il,\i;j,j, ;~\ Si '.:i:~. ,lIIi, f.!.ll' ~!.\. ..;w .(lv., ;ii':., :....., t.:..~ ...!k (.i,', .ius' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Mark Stageberg ADDRESS 21075 Radisson Road PID# 35-117-23-11-0079 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. 2 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 2560 GROUND FLR. AREA 1829 GARAGE - ATT. 3 car DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR Yes SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING 60% BATH- DELUXE FULL 2 3/4 1 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS 2 - est. WALKOUT Yes YEARBUlLT 1990 LOT SIZE 120 FF PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK Yes # OF FIREPLACES 1 LAKESHORE Christmas Lk MISe. COMMENTS Homeowner did not request an interior review of the property. The interior has not been reviewed since construction. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 150500 BUILDING 273500 TOTAL 424000 ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 188000 275000 463000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/2/98 5 - ,1) ,v , i ..10 -,.' ." ,p" . "{:", ----- - - -------- 26 35-117-23 11 0079 f!.[RNI (~ C DROOI\~ CHRISTMAS LAKE ADDN 2 1'"1'5 RAOISSnN INN:.RO (Yl A-a.~ c;;r'A- 6-,'t-B ? l'Z 6- EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2/0, r flAOI ~f,ON fl.-of-\.O ...._a..____..'" __.. _____ LOT 4 BLOCK 1 ----.-------.-----..:::::::---..-----.- ~ -'" HMSTD YEAR YES NO 19 LAND sl)U(~-- TOTAL MARKET J 7 C) ~v'- ~, I! i) ()) &> T~~ } 29900'6:99~~ ";t\\)~ 0 0 0' PROP SCH TYPE DIST t.-aC1 % OWN SR ~O:-'-6':' IfJ5()I'O . . ..RL WS Sale Date Sale Date Sale Date Sale Date Remarks: - -- Amount II~ 0(')0. Amount Amount Amount ~~~.~;L~~~'~:;~~tli;(; y~~ST~O Y~~R % OW!!- -&f't'"' --- LAND -- ~!RUCTURE I-- '. ';, "'!:':~; .) ", '. ,i. .... ',"-:- '",".-. ""j' :.: x ~S P?L/- X ~~fgbh'r 80/00 . ~ ~ 8 I , /) !5 (;f.) eJ 1(57 X Cfo 114<'000 114foOO X C7\ 1/ 'I-~o 0 ~ S () I () O'S ~4r? OcJ -'~ CJJ.. l Ll/~co ::J1l41l)~ ~5)?IOO . ~~i .. ~. '~.'" ........ .'. ~"t; I\~:~ ~ <,' ")( (... ~"". "~ .~ '~.'::j, .~ ,~ -X 'A ';" ,~ ,".'r.;i.~;;~;i) . FJ( "'I";.:;o.r ~rmllY! '/' ~ ~ ~ CJ V !;If 7 P ~ r;.,I .~ ~ t', ri< :;1' v t..""';' ,. 'r'. 'f- <=14 I 2.<1lclca 2~G,lcoo 38h PJO )( I q s 1/ 3 5 So 0 J. 5 11s 0 0 3 q ) 0 0 0 'X '1~ / '-/2 001,) 25'9000 '10' 000 ;(. 0 1 I 5' 015 0 () ).. 7 :3 5 0 0 ~ 'Z ~ 0 () () )( ~g (310)0 27S~ool/':JOOO . '. ,'.; ".:i""~i :'. .... . . ::::.""~;;' "f!i.';; "';... , .'\ ,'1 f']J,' , ...)f;:".. .'.' ,il:I,'i'" ,.: '.... ...,\',i:, ',"':.' I,',' '.: '.i .. '. . ".; '.<; ,'i::."<. . E';': ~ :).'" .' ..; ."if: ;} '..'<J.f '.> ~,p "i,!' {'\I.? :;,{' ".;, '.'\ ,,', ~f .,;.,}'fii<,' .:.:.;. . I."". ""i',' . '~!d!~ ;';.l:~ S;f. :.Uiilli, .. .~t 'l;"W ,~.a \11; .If, i'~~,; 't'l, :~(l boW.' I. !1Ii'd jl,: ~: &: l~ ,h.; i'4 J_ i\lM;. ~.t~~;t\; (~~"iltkK~' \".~;!M((: ,'i" ..' , .. ~ .. '_ ., . . I TOTAL MARKE' . .' ;,~;\, I'{;.', . '.' 1'\' . ~~;~ "~I .,;, . ;' .. '. ';'. ,..:. ,,'/ " '.;'. .. ~'I, t;:~': ~i:.', J~\ tit.! ~'. i .~M ,,", I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ernest Brandhorst ADDRESS 27225 Smithtown Road PID# 31-117-23-44-0028 PROPERTY TYPE L- SALE PRICE $N/ A STORY HGT. 1-3/4 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 1692 GROUND FLR. AREA 1146 GARAGE - A IT. DET. 2 car TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR No SALE DATE N/ A BSMT. FINISHING BATH- DELUXE FULL 1 3/4 1 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS WALKOUT No YEAR BUILT 1925 0% LOT SIZE 9.7 Acres PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK Yes # OF FIREPLACES 1 LAKE SHORE None MISC. COMMENTS This is an agricultural property that is being used to grow nursery products for wholesale sale. According to the Hennepin County Assessor's office this property would most likely Qualify for Green Acres tax classification. The property owner is in the process of applying for the Green Acres classification. This classification will substantially reduce his tax liability. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No valuation change DATE 4/3/98 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... 1111" .~'~'~""~'.:~'.:~' 'f:.0"0 ~ 0.:0 ...~.~.~" 1111 ~coco.. -Q Q Q'Q ~CO:CD CD CD :,'iii;Z .~~~~: ..0~!, ;~i~ .:~~ .0_ . (l)Q ';',;;-::~y, '. '~if~ a: > H,':::;-'" . a. t"- ~:~ .~ ,~ ~ ;, fI) ~~~ aO:r: ~ OQ I'fl ZQI'fl "4"<a:Lt'\ .. -4" a: Lt'\ .~ cQ Z ~ ~<~ ~ ,Z ~Z ,....~:r::E ~~~ ,~ ~ a: ''''::E:O "" ~ fI)~ -f ~ ~ ~ Lt'\ ~ ...<] WNW -~1 ZNU ';I '" cc: ,.... )( ItNW NW ,~: ... .,> , ....::::F:~: .'I~I~ " ;"I,,':';h:f~:';~'~II;"'" , I, ".< .,.,~\'" ,~...' ~- < '. I .......-.. 'i~.<'\. ~ '~.'. ',... ":;::';< t"'~t;':". ~.:ti~:~: ~'l. ~ ~ "..~~ I.....c';. . ";";'. .;~g;: i;:~:. ........ : ~;"'...: <,.."I:';;,;~,. ~;,:~,. ... ' ~ "':'~,'. I,';~~' .,,'..'" ,~ , .~ .' @;: '. .... "'-', I:>:::.:. ;:~ k~." .' . ;" '" I...:."':" '~, ~. '~,:' '.' : :.~:':~"''::'';'''-:'''~,:~''::'~. "'~~:' i~' ~ . j ,;""'.. .1.". ..~~;~, '<,,-, ':-;,:;:"' "I",::::'~;~- ".......... .,.~'.~ ' ~~ .....-. '-"'" ,~~ ~ . - '. , . ..: /:~:ij f~~' .1;.<.:", " . . ,~.: ~.. .....\~.:; I.;il "",""~ ~~, .. Ii: ....:;: ;~ .-1.- :" . < .~ J~. . .........";~ -i.t!i'<~":;" 1,;iii!ttiJ "...." ">;" :. .......~ ~ . .'. ~, >;~JI .... I> :.~.'; .;. .....: QOI " .~ . ti Z .. · .....:;:J~: . ,; ~m",:'A .... ........:.' !~r.' Ii .'." .. ...... ..' .... I.' t::) In n a -olllIG 0 .*, Q' .~,~ _1_1.1 ~ ~ ()."" 0 0 . 0 .... Q),~ I n "~. :~,,,,='I ~., t?c <() r....; ::r to _ d ~,t;.~ ~.:. :iflii.'$ ~~~ fl ..." Iw) <:) ~ 0 .,. 9:;~& ij). :~~, ;*t~"... '. .g ,........ ~ N tJi N) to $).' ~,;~llS ~>.I_.i I" Ir< -:>i i"\ i=' ":--- -"!" ;---.' ...",~~L.~ .~~ ~~..- ....,. ;0 q OQ ;,:; c .00 <Q- ( .. 0 ....r.:)Q ,,~ \2).l.a iO ." ". .;..~. ":.. S!. '.~ ~ () 0 D " () !:) 0'1(" '()Cl-o 0 .c....,.. """ ~,^" ;.... "', . ~., ~ '0 '0 () c<; '0 '" ':) ~~~. . . '':~' .a- ,$ 7' -:: ~,Q .... ,.. . ~ I"~ - ..S) - '1'- - ('.. - 't-7 ". .:. ~- 0- ~ .~ ~ ;.- .!it. _ .' ~/ . tfll ". U) ~ .~ :..9c;i .~ ...s :,. 'tk ..'~ \r. ~. " .::: .~ n () Q n '. ~ ~ o.~o 0 O~;);I~'~~':""" - 1/>0 ~ 0 0 :"'. '-.1 ':) :) ~(. 00 ~ (.) ..~ '01 a(')~ ....... Q .0 v 0 0 ~. ::: .:j ~ ~(JI. 00 ~ s:'\x; I ~ <() .~.. ':.'" s,~ .tb ..g, N tf I ~ .Os' r- it).~ I.il\~ ~ . n ~. 00..'" ~-Q~ ';';;;;;' I . \i\ . - LQ r-J . '-Sl ~ ~ "I..~ ''iif &;) ~'It{' c;J.; ~~ I. '. .,.... ,.c:.' . '. ". ..'" -= ,';""" ~ .~.._'-"";',1/. .' '.' ",,' "'~ :;''''' :~ " '. "Ir;"'I~;: ..~ '. l\J .... rJ: "'1. ";" ~." t:.~ ~';;~. '.- .(1) ,'.} > "7' . -.' ....... \"'I(~:. .. . .'~;~ ;; ~ '';'c r4.0'. .... .. ' . ";',' :: ..," . ~:., *: i~~:" ......... ........ >. l. , . ..a:Ui 'I:~R. .:f1t2. ......~o- f.' I':,;'.~ '::~.. ..' , '.;g~~ ~<l" . .....-I. ..':, ,.-.'; .... ...; ;", ." :"."', "c$'''. ';"~'f ~'.'~...'. .~. Q .'~. ~ ~~.~: ~ $..' "~I~' ..~...:~...~.... ! ~: .. >., ~ v 0- i ~ -',) (.) \r~' (t"1~' ..~. ~. ." 00 ..' '. . " 'I.r' .~" -;~. ... Ii::: Z ..' ~i ...~,.:~~ ;; ~ m~ .~ )< :." ,> , ~ >< " , ~.r. ....; :~: 1.;_~J~'r' ........, ",. . .... ','. .... ,.;.,- 6A or- -J ... ..:./.... so- :";.", a ::e .... " ~ ~ . -"~1. c.,. .~~ ft'> ..:.e'i I. 'w" I~..:. I a: ~..I....... ;:). . a: ti I' . .' ,:~ '. '::'.4<'; - , 1:; ...j,'i .. "', .' 'c. ........ '.... y; ~ . :5 >: , . :> ;;.. ~>... /t:. . -,~ . . gj I ',. '. . :.;:Jo .~ ::. . 'if. . '. a: '. ~~I ;~;z : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ernest Brandhorst ADDRESS PID# 31-117-23-41-0021 PROPERTY TYPE L- SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. GROSS BLDG. AREA GROUND FLR. AREA GARAGE- ATT. DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING BATH - DELUXE FULL 3/4 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS WALKOUT MISe. COMMENTS See Page 6 in this book for canment YEAR BUILT % LOT SIZE PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK # OF FIREPLACES LAKE SHORE VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND 30000 3300.0. No BUILDING change TOTAL 30.0.0.0. 330.0.0. ASSESSOR T. Haller DATE 6B -------- - - 26 31-117-23 41 0021 ERNEST & TINA BRANDHORST 27225 SHITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ~~\! v'.~h\ , 'PROP,J' .. X ii:, 't~i,fl .~ sat. a ~~'D~i~"'i~:;~~~f,~'\~~~:!Ii/G'H%~*!'; ~.Datlti~M\;Jf(?,;p,I~~~".\:!i;!^,~{t~~lkf?&'t< SaI"Dat~f';! '/'i'Y!'Wr!:';i/!;).;: 'i~...':~~::.i'.; !l~f 'ci~IN~4;~~t~~~f~~ 't!i~ttir~~:~~tJm(~ ..;....~_~>:..,~ i' ",-,""{:::' '"";'._.'., ,;.. HMsTD,: .,.r.....~.'.l.. ::..;%,.;.'.0Vm.......," "..(.' '.' .. ';".:" "RU'~i ;~:;~..,O,.,.A.'...M.AR"~!i;i. HM rTD ,%.Y.EAR. ....~ ^,A'N '.: '.C" .;,;1 ' . ~ . . . , .. . YES NO 194, t .........- "...' ....... """....,. YES NO "19 ...... . SR" .' .LAND..:.....,.:.....:.."...:.r....'.... ,..;...;;-i'8TRUCriJRE.....\...;.'...'.:....,.i..,:.}..~..... ,".,',TOTALMJ ''':~ I, ,,' ;,t!\., :,'__.,: '," '.h.';o,!.';'~ >(~j}\~:;~~ -':J;",.,; d.. ,\,.,' -,_, \. ,f "t" :;,:.:'; >: ~-'.' -.' ", , , ;. , ' ' .....vt..:> bfkif.:';j ,~,.t2;i'I,:4" ." I....~ .:1; i~:: ,;~.i! ,',r.,l..\':,'\ 'X.':' '.,;.'\ .;<<'.... . ....' -;- ""\ /\ 'Y:',\:' ....:.(J,).., ":',';1<''/''" '''K'ff'i' ';;JJ/...;,' !f./J ,u ,~f': . I (J(}17 .:; .' . c.', .\:,l.'"'.'.''''' . .",.,.:,' ,: ...... : '.' .' ." .'. !'~?;i")'::':; ..'~ f.' ~~;.. :'ii, j' Vt' .' ......c.." . . . :', .'.:..,. >.' ." '., . .,,' ..;. , '. .,' ..',. -:.\/' '.' '--J:. I>' t::j5:/.:,;..":'.?,.' .: "::/4 6 ~~p' ..... ....... I 4 a O' ':" .i; " ". : I;: ",><:.,},t, :... " I 8 00 a;'::'J',;' ..' ....,:,..1/ I 0 C> 0 6 .. ". '.' ...... .'. ':It .... q (" ':. .; ..... t q ..." f) 0..... :/ . .'." :':". "I '3" ~ __ .... '/. '.' Cf7' .' ..' 30~ 06 ':' ........ .' Boo 0 0'/ ~. .... "'..".., ,." '7"... l<_ ....~ ..' 1,-:- . Q.. . ~l'.'> ,,' , .~.' ." ;.;' ','. ..< {. ~ '~.. , '.' I'. <,.' ' < '~. ' , . 1... " ' ^ . ,,' ,J " " : . .... """i.' ' .~!<..~~' ~ ~ . \f.:"7f 'W' . f:~" · ' ! ~. . u, .. . '.< :-- '~""~'/ .' . ,'. '. /, '.. " \ . )1 ;" :""" ..' y..,,\,-,.; :: '; ." /. , I'. I,'; Er . .... . '. I., ...... .... ", .... ,. . .....' '::. ; -< .; I':"';' :......, '," ".f ,.;". h .< ' -: ' :.!, . c-;:'-'. :.....: '. I..... ..' .;c ". ..i'.,. ...:'. ..... '.::/"'.', \'>;!'l ",'F 1"%" ,,c.. I ". I....,..: .;..'," . .'. '.' 1..:..:,'.....,.:,>/\., .....,'.... .f' '. .... ~.. ..... li :~:: . ... ." "f::" j;, 1'1~1: (.:,'..' ........,. " .'. .':., ....( .... '. .' ".. \:,i:." ....... '.' II ..' I .~ I. ~t.I~II.I"'~.~, ,~( ;\tf, \~~~~i~H;->l"g ....x:y .~ )~; ~~I~ \tt~l& ~J'~: ~~,~. ~;~" :tt~ t. '.; .. : '. " ' !:i.,.,... ' :~. i>>i.' " :fiJ.' iil.~~' ,}lrt. ~.' .- ;i.\.'.;~l:.->:.. :'y "';'. ~.k.".' '1," ".''''. >;,~ ..J.. "~..'..' ~it :&ll~ ltl~,. _'l". ,k jf:l;. ~ I ~ ~. ~ _. ~ffI.; ~ ~. ~' ~. ~':~.~~~.f~;: .:~.~i'(.:;~t ';/~:~ I~W :wr: ~4P'. ;~:. .'{;~, ~b;' .~-.~' ~~~.. g~ .~::, ~\~;.:., I !"'li'l 'II'~ ..- ': ':. Iii' '.' I:. ' ~\ . ~ ", ,..{ , .,{ '. 0'\ () c..-. :.. t:. ~'I m ,,;~! .; .., fl .' ," ,< . ; , - ,. , : , ; , , . " ~ , , .' ! ; .. .' " " . :\- '. '. , . I ,. , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ernest Brandhorst ADDRESS PID# 31-117-23-41-0022 PROPERTY TYPE L- SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. GROSS BLDG. AREA GROUND FLR. AREA GARAGE- ATT. DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR MISe. COMMENTS See Page 6 SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING BATH - DELUXE FULL 3/4 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS WALKOUT YEAR BUlL T % LOT SIZE PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK # OF FIREPLACES LAKE SHORE 1998 PAY 1999 33000 33000 _ 6D RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE _..u_,,~_..._._.... "J .. /,,- , .' I ( I 2631-117-23 41 0022 ERNEST & TINA BRANDHORST .. - ... - .. .. .. - .. - ~ - -';'.~ L. i SMITHTOWN RO - PROP SCH. DIS OIST. 27225 55331 AODRESS TYPE W.S. NO. PLAT PARCEL EXCELSIOR MN #-f REMARKS. \ \. , ~ ;).,-.T \"iF <... - ] ~. .(.. I V T r\!C~ (; "f,~ \ ~.:.,.., j . UWN 0"" OWN n,.,. . OWN ,,. NON-HMST ASS'O t.lACHINERi" ASS'D TOTAL ASS'D MACHINERY TOTAL' MARKET HMST ASS'D HMS TO YEAR HMSTD AllOW LAND STRUCTURE YES NO 19 % 'l\ % " )<. fi1A 5 I !A (.) u tJ I ~1 p c,.' 0 g~ n 4 0 I ft 0 :) . X A J 0 n i R" I ~-'} jj )( 'tc ') q J , ;J (J () '-' , 4- Q C >v ..... .... i"y'.' w~, r., ,.,. "^, ,'.",-:. ,"':1\ .::....... r :.". .~.'.I'..,; JI'., " .,. " '.. .i. ,I,' ,"\ ':'. . .... -",l;. . .. '...:'~ ., ..... ! .,~, '-:.~0 (~1', <;"-;)} 7/ /~ X ?} 1L' , 11 , \ }o, i L D i J D ! - '/.. '15 I 4 0 0 I 4. Q , I I 'I- 'tlo , 0 0 0 0 I 0 C() 0 I X 'l~ ~ 3 0 0 'I 3 (:> G f <11 3 () 0 () 0 3 c C> 0 ~ ;( 01 f ? 7 ') D I 9 7 /') C ~I X q~ 3 j 0 0 ~ 3 3 (), ') ~ . ;;: . .' ~L::\ ' :.', ~,: J .';:~~:~ .~~;;~;, ~~-1~:: ',1.: .,.~ ..r., ,.~~,:'::~~ ~Wi: ..' " ;. " .' I.~i .1;.<< I; .,',1 ",1, '. " ..,.. ,,' . . '~" ..:.-, " .:,\',1.: ,l." '(, ~,'.;- ., .~. , I.. '" tr:1 .. " j fLoW L I I I I I I I e I I j I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Jeffrey Fox ADDRESS 5270 Howards Point Road PID# 30-117-23-44-0009 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. 1 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 1966 GROUND FLR. AREA 1966 GARAGE - ATT. 2 car DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR Yes SALE DATE BSMT, FINISHING BATH- DELUXE FULL 2 3/4 1 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS 3 WALKOUT Yes YEARBUILT 1955 50% LOT SIZE 27878 PORCH- GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK Yes # OF FIREPLACES 2 LAKE SHORE 160 FF Upper Lake MISC. COMMENTS See page 111 in 1998 sales book for sale of property with a structure of similar size and age to that of the subject property. See also page 113 of 1998 sales book for a sale on Howard's Point Road within two blocks of the subiect property. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LPUNIT) 283500 BUILDING 134500 TOTAL 418000 ASSESSOR Torn Haller 1998 PAY 1999 368500 136000 504500 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/2/98 7 I -I-- I I I I I "... . .. .. .. / / I I I I -- ----- - I ,\ \ \. >,A I ,/ ...~ L ..... ..... \,.... ':,,'\"::.:',.;f;i1(~~i.:' ~ r'" . --,' - :\S;">.hi;;'i,,/.. \. I . ff "r..!'-:) :.' .'.;.'.. \~,l ii~7.t.:'..l?J\~, ....".[..~... ~ !~. :', {~~;.' ~: ~;;~j;~~M:;g~;',." . \ (,5) ".\ /. -:::. ,-" S:;'&.s ( i) .--;---.. \ \ 2 (4) . "2, S I .1 ,.-;.! - C\:;- t:. '.... -l.! . .:)~ i:..t~ \ "-{S , , I " 15 I I ,/ (' I I I , I , , I , I I I I I I I .. - . i_ "811 _ -- -- FE ... ... -" "" I I I - I I I ~I"~' ~~ ~ , ~:,I;l.~ :.~,'W,~ .... :'S... "~:. .~.... ~~W:. I{':-~' ~:,~~:: ':i' l ':-<l."<.';: ~ ,.. : ..J . . ~ \ 12 " .' .:;;;-", I 'Iii I> ) a: . ~ ",.0 ii!.' ..' :)ii... .,.,C; '..: :~::}.;: 1,<', ...... ~ t':,-,;~ .... .... : ; ~ .tt~:. ;~ t ~ ;,of>:!. ~ ;g~fi' -2'-':0:.; 0 :,j:j', '.i:::r::" ". >~' S I...... ,-. ''":':;'~'~ . I.... . a: (I);' .; . .. ....... .Z: ... .~, )~':/.I.. ..... .... .,'$.: . ".,'. '>:;,". .c... ..... ~'~?, .:.~..:.. .. S~I."" ....' ,.... Oz .<'. :E (/)1 E~ ';.':'. " .", '.: .' ; , -, - : . ... .. ':. ."" , " . " . :. ':, '.' " . ;z~Q; ~i!, ,,0:>0. ~~~;; . :~,~',:O'O :01'-0 ..('\~" :;\I~ Q 'OG In .(\ .-I'~~i~ i .~:~ 0"'" 0 <'\ to ~':;!'~.:~\n d Go {l'- ..s Ja.:' ,:I,>I~ :rC\~)M Ti,:::- ..~:.Ti'.~. ..... I .."" #OJ N "'^... ~ .~I .~~ r .~~ ioQ,',S)0 I.~ J a:. .:0 ~:'lQ ;~'~ " '~. ~:~I.c1 G' ~ .1 :ii!. L~ I~lr : ,""",.' :....... J' -::~::;t2 ':.0'" ..'"- - .-;;. . f\ ~. ...~ .~' ......;.;,; . -::- ,-",- :~ <0 Q. ()n III . '.~ '0. ~:,:" . g:.Jt ...<) (\ ':> ().l ~. .0.. ..C :<:)N.. rOc .Vl .' >~~~ ~~.9 ,,~ ~.,~O rg.' oS ~ ....._ _ ...... :f{jf -. ._1-'-"; ..... ,,' r( ~.. "_." . L.':' \'-1 ...". ~\\ '1I ;1(;: :e; I':>' I,. , '.~.,.r~~~{:'."..f:i j,1~1L 1"'(,. I . ..... .. ~.~. .::" ~> :,~~:. I,;:'~ 1 ': .' ~ f~:.~..:~~;~S ~~ .' >-.,,::;~ .Qr,J .~- IV. 1Cl. .... "f.O ,,' . .~ z'~'i I:..> ~~,>,'N.. ~ X. ~ ~ .~ ",c..>....:.; .' .." 7B .. ":.,:: ."... '~j.~.~ ~~: I ..' .~~ :tf:i' . -:;j;. '~~~~"i::!" .. ~~;;~~. ~~. ", ;.:; "" :-"'.',. , ...... r::;.;;;: .~.- .. ":;..:.,.,,,- h.,':>~: "~ ',-',' ,_:_',"<t.,> I,~;;:t~~: ;~~~_, .;--. .,; -~ .- -'~'-;"".' I'}~~:'~, :_~~: ...~ . '., ..' I,"'(~: .' *, _' .... .;:''':~'~'''' .... ..!.,.~~~~.'. '. ,:,., ~f.\? :X;~-.: . ~"C.' :;:':,,,,~ ~ :~::'. ~~,'!t'...,.~.. 4?i~';~': _ ,::"",,:'}~C. , ,~~ " :...,.. ...- I .~!' . . ~ . . ',..;;' " . . , .. . .... ;~~ .. ..,....;, '. "1.< '. .... .... .. ...... '../~ .... 1-~:9" I <">'. I ))i I'" ....... I'/~) . i... ". .........::./. " .... ..:\. :':" . .. ~ ~. .....~~.~+. :~ I. '.:... ~'U 'B('"'' I, ~.I* .:' ~ 'c::.... n\. .;; -;I.,;o.~';" .~ I't. J ... ,"" ... o 0 \.1"':" ",.. .~ ....0 6() ~..;I:: ~. "....0--.- '"".. ~;;:,,~ .:'(,? ~ ,,- .,"'''..., L~ '0.'0 ~i ~ .,' ."0 ('") -. .~ . ... ' ~ Ilfl('l .~~::~$ ...., ,. Ceo .~\. .~ ~ - .... ::t"J '1\0 I C'( '..::!'!?}~'... .~., .. ::~ - ........ .t;:","f' :~p ~, &11'('(') \..'}fj'::";~ ...,.. ,~ O 0 ......v ';':,iiii:.'I~I~ , :,!,,~:'I~~ \J) I", .\_ .:.C' ,.'~ .. _. ~ I V"'';;-:'~.. " :,'J" .ro ':#~+_ ; "'." r \'l (() ~.'~,*~; ~ ' '''. - ., c-.J -N.,," ......... Ii;:; 'i~ .' ,.... ,.. :,; "'" ....: ..: [~..~. :~.;c:!jI."1t ~".:~<,~~: V';;;;" .' '\\~ -- ;~.:-. . .~:r~ I ..':; .;t,: ':--'$i: .. 1< .;.: ....::~~ .)( . 't:- :x I:',~: I~ .: .', \;5>~ ,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Rodney and Pamela Helling ADDRESS 26000 Shorewood Oaks Drive PID# 32-117-23-44-0022 PROPERTY TYPE &- SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1996 STORYHGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 23,495 GROSS BLDG. AREA 1735 BATH- DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1220 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE - A TT. 3 car 3/4 OPEN Yes DET. 1/2 1 DECK In process TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 1 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKE SHORE MISC. COMMENTS The property was in process of new construction for 1997 payable 1998. The completed value of the structure was reduced based on an interior inspection. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND New BUILDING construction TOTAL 87400 ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 42000 186700 228700 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 42000 162300 204300 DATE 4/2/98 8 .. r .......-... ---.... ......-.----.. J t.~;~;.i~~',)',~~.t~l~ 1J._~;;t:,',. .~....~~:L~ '~;-' -. .. .. ::: <:;i"":'~"';: ....::'..:,;:..',_:IJ.>,:.':,-:(r.~.: -;':::"'-;f',-:~""~~' .'.. .:.' \" ," . . 26 32-117-23 44 0022 T-HE-GaEAt-S.T-OGK----eOR-P- 13009 DIAMOND PATH W APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ~--~.._'-'. _.-.......__..........:~~...:... ~~ ~~o{l.~ t:J~~~~. " . " 'l\"i:,: 1.\ ',.,l;, " HMSTD YEAR YES NO 19 % OWN SR 'f 81 BfJ/Yt; I 1)( 90 'f. q{ ~ ~rd- II Cf 3p ?rI ~ 'f- CfSI/Ci(;' x )y1~1 (~ '>( ~ _~~~\. I' '.'. ',"., "i' -","':" .' j)!iMl. '!v..~' ,. '.jIN :(~,I.~r<'r:~:L~';~! iiJiift: iN . .,_,J'. IL';'~_.; ~.:.. '!.:., "l: "'_ ~. ,,~... '.... . . LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET I.. _ o z.~oO z.:::SOO fo o I/'1 Q " \ , PROP SCH WS Sale Date TYPE DIST Sale Date ~ ~1lt ~ Sale Date Sale Date Remarks: I ~ ~ III... C.LT)' S"'- 1'1- 'rCc-, '-/- q.- q7 Amount Amount Amount Amount " ,I . STRUCTURE 7J. '5 If :.\ ~ I" S I, i ~-- -z.- t;; ,) r:J d c~.~<15 TOTAL MARKET ~.:;()O 1/(' /" '" 0 - JUCO 25000 3ECOO 35000 ~~lr~~ ~'I'~~ ~,~~~ 4" Q 0 0 lie ~ 'I () 0 Z '2. ~., ole ,.' I......t, 'OlU ,", ,1...dMB, L.... '"'" 1,w.II" .' ..<,. '1" ~ .'W" I.........." ~ .;~. lim. "W. i..I. ,11.. h"i :Ili!, '''''''' 'Ill .' tiI. ,,,'t,.'iiI. ~l~ iIOls Iaiir. l.!Il, .a ~. .q.. ''Il' ~. Iff ~ ;~"I\Irf.~' ..' -~, " :: ~~:J'I""~'" 11l!''''~~"'''! ;,r.,; ,,~:' ~~q~;v ,'f\i.~ ';l'i'~\\ :>11\"1' 9'fi m~ '~ II.m1 J~' .~ f~ q ? IlI',r:-' (l ,,~", ' . .\) j,j J, \.:. C\....., \ ,"p {, ( ::~~)\\c>!") ') \\'''U ~_ d~.:. i, HMSTD YEAR YES NO 19 0/. OWN SR "'! LAND ,:~~:! '\~" : :: I'~ ....., "" ,IIi.:.. 'i ...... .,. ':'" :.::i,f." ,,:' , l.s1, :'::': :~ ,',li\..~:' II}, (;l;.~.l W'~i'gl i."lI'!:i. ,,(:it ::;;'il.'.~ ....:~.';;,~ '.SI", ';~,\' X~\:'~j:;i'il:(,' i"ll'.' ,:, .,,': ,i,', ", .~ i~.\t .t' ';~., ., } ,1. '~Jl .::w; ::t";q': \l~, ~1~:~ :~\..'. ~t.'.'il~./l' ~:\~:t."}: ':~~'i'fl' ;,~( ::,.rt!}J~::'~ ._:'- :~ ,', , :. " .\, !~.~ ); J:~~ j(:. ',:~' ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Kelly Rogers ADDRESS 20960 Radisson Road PID# 35-117-23-11-0015 PROPERTY TYPE B-....- SALE PRICE $152000 SALE DATE 10/18/92 YEAR BUILT 1925 STORY HGT. Split Level BSMT. FINISHING 60% LOT SIZE 17400 SF GROSS BLDG. AREA 1441 BATH- DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1441 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE- ATT. 3/4 est 1 OPEN DET. 2 car 1/2 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3up # OF FIREPLACES CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKESHORE MISC. COMMENTS Purchased for 152,00010-18-92. Was improved with double attached garage for the 1-2-96 assessment. Value now hardly exceeds sale price six years ago. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~ 50000 BUILDING 105000 TOTAL 155000 ASSESSOR R. Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 50000 109100 159100 DATE 4/3/98 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SlJBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ray Barton ADDRESS 5915 Christmas Lake Road PID# 35-117-23-42-0020 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1990 STORYHGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 70% LOT SIZE 120ff, 40,000 sf GROSS BLDG. AREA 2784 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 2784 FULL 2 SCREENED GARAGE- ATT. 3 car 3/4 OPEN Yes DET. 1/2 2 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 2 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE Christmas Lk MISC. COMMENTS Has pool -- see following page for sale of smaller home on a smaller lot, with slightly better lake access. Please refer to the other Christmas Lake sales on pages 102 and 103 of sales book. Mr. Barton's home is far superior to either of these homes, while his lot is inferior. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~ 200000 BUILDING 413000 TOTAL 613000 ASSESSOR R. Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 250000 417000 667000 DATE 4/3/98 11 I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 5630 CHRISTMAS LAKE PT PID#: 35-117-23-14-0009 SALE PRICE: $ 685,000 YEAR BUILT: 1968 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2270 GROUND FLR. AREA: 2270 GARAGE #1: ATTACHED # OF CARS: 3 GARAGE #2: # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S): 2 CENTRAL AIR: YES WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE BEDROOMS: 5 COMMENTS: SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: DECK: YES 199710 1 STORY BSMT. FINISHING: 80 % PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: YES OPEN: BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 2 3/4: 2 1/2: 1 LOT SIZE: 23,500 SF INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 11A '. -~-..~~~~~~-~~~~~-~ ':' . . . N RAYMOND L & MARY 0 B '" .. ~~;!;~t/' " :"',' .'-"hi,;,; ;L.:,i ...,~;..:,,",,,.'~;"; .' C HRI STMA S LAKE RO .' . 5915 55331 I. iI. ;'.. f?o/ .:(~:\ C) ()(') t, EXCELSIOR MN .i PROP SCH WS Sale Date C. Amount TYPE DIST Sale Date Amount , If/- ~1~ ..3 Sale Date Amount ., '. j '\ .' Sale Date Amount \ ~~~ Remarks: \, \ \ .. :)VI k;.!.) 0 "'iI Cfl N,/P .? > -..) }-! ') I '. ! '. .. {.\A':.......'I/;,..lt.. HMSTD YEAR % OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET HMSTD YEAR % OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKel YES NO 19 YES NO 19 X 1.3 ~ S I~ ~ b 9 r:< 6 ~ () / ~ / () CJ 0 ~'-I '" " c 10 9 g i () 0 / (, ~ '/ () . 0 0 X ~~ r!& I 0 C !c; Q c:> <1 <9 I 0 D I 9 ~ 7 (.) P V ~1 I 0 0 0 0 p q ~ 0 0 0 J q C) 0 0 0 V 2>8 J I t:J b CJ () J - .- C- O 2 , q SJ3 0 0 n '1 Ifl'Il >. ~'9 ) ;) ~ 5 C) Ie J I l.f 8 0 0 ~ 4 I .3 (: Ie " X qO 1 5 C C 0 0 I ( f I 0 0 z. (g ? 7 Q 0 v y.. 90 ~ J 5 q c C " A >- rQ C;S ~ 0 0 Ie 0 -, 0 ~ ., , v 0 4- I 10 7 6 5 " ~ () .......... ..... 0:: ~ CJ I / S' 0 b P 0 0 I C) '" ".~1 ~>< '1 ( -=< &O~ c:. (~~ ) 0,,1 / S 0 b, 0 ..,) ~ ~ 0 Q ~ t1 ~ jblii~, ~. (.- -- ~t~i . ..,.,.....'......,,>,. \iJiH)': ,..~ ",... t - l.:"." .1\1 ,,,.., -- ;/' >..,' ~)>,..."l '\', ,.'; . . " - . ' . .~ . t r flIIIi I . , . . ~\;. ~~:I..,,\,,\,fi. . ' :. , IJU ~. lj' I,'~ ~.~~ ,~ " :ft;- 'il,\\,> "if' I ~~'.\1f..~"'W;'l \,:<r!:n ,lin. rt\}~.., ~\tf> i~\~.: ir-;~ Y-rf" ~l A~,' .., ,>' '.' II ;, l:f '~~'''':,' . .. , "1'0' <,' ;'0;....1:. 0; ... '-.' ., .: 0, '&::...... U'J'" "f . . , ,. ..I Y 94 I 9 0 0 Ie 0 4 0 '1 0 0 " 5 '1 '1 0 " d )( C}~ I q q <:: 0 0 ,!{ 0 b S D 0 b " (.. 0 D 0 ~ 'I , ~ X I 1 't I~ (;) 0 3 " Z 2 0 0 5 2- ? 0 0 y qh , R 1& I~ 0 0 3 ~ .~ S /) 0 S , .., Q l) 0 )( ~7 .- a 4 I 3 0 " " Il. ~ "" z 0 I 'J ] X q'i 'ttl,fJ 2. S '-I t- 7 .' '* , 7 . .' 0 t:> b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :> ":.: j"., ~rt~~.~L' '<r'; ::i/' ,;'. '. ! ffi J 0 , , I':. :,' :.... .:. ., .. " .'" !:'" :.:. ,; r< '0 r.y .. , '. ,.; :." I.... .' .\-. , . ii):' if;lj~~', I ,~: b::~i;~'~. .:.. . .; ':~)~: ,:i.{ ,< ;,) '. " :~r I ~( ~~{{~~ ',.{ '," '}', ',,' "1,. 1'1;:: \.-{ "';: ;f;i {~ '; ,",:, ' \.'.:" .' ;.2"; \'.'1 :; >:t; "'-: ....\ :; ..... " , ,;'~1:i' ~ " " '," .. . . ,. . ' .... 1" /;. t~, n, '. . ~i" II ~:tr' t(~" H t~i;; :(i: I.:,)': ;( '~r~' ,fj~ ~-~~f fi~' i, ~ ")" '... ...U'. 1:'<;;; ;::~;:; '.,' ,..:, I,:" " :<:.. I'J'; I" :y N ;;:i~ ,II;';' ~ } ~:y,~ ;,'utj ';\1 ,,,"' Wft.. ,t..f' < \, " . }' '. '~' ~h -tf! :M Il,' Mi!:~j~;:. .. ,": '/;.1-:/ ;~:~., "U:" ;r 'f~ ,: .f, __l~ ,J'i ,'I!!'~ , . " ,.' '.~ ',',: 1'" " ..~ . il ~; I I . l~'~'II~1 it i II fir :~ ~:(tj *: ~. I vi.'. .f~ It ':A t ~'i.' II' ; ~l ') (I. '. " J' '~: .,~.~. ~ ./ II, . e~ y ~\ :# 'J , it i ._~2? }3f .. ti ' i; . $ :. ~ .' ~..' . I' t .~i(, ,','. . ,,', , , I, I 'l" ,"...... .. w,. .1_, "~" !!!:Y. =- ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME John Hung ADDRESS 20885 Radisson Road PID# 35-117-23-11-0011 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1976 STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 30% LOT SIZE 17400 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2546 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR AREA 1544 FULL 2 SCREENED Yes GARAGE - ATT. 3/4 OPEN DET. 1/2 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER 2 car # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 1 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE 40FF MISe. COMMENTS Mr. Hung attended the local Board of Review and addressed the council. However, he did not request a review of his property. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~ 15500 BUILDING 158200 TOTAL 313200 ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 193500 158500 352000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 12 I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Michael McDonald ADDRESS 4695 Lagoon Drive PID# 30-117-23-31-0004 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $N/A SALE DATE N/A YEAR BUILT 1956 STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 30,000 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2206 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA FULL 2 SCREENED GARAGE - ATT. 3/4 OPEN DET. 2 car 1/2 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS # OF FIREPLACES CENTRAL AIR WALKOUT LAKE SHORE 255 FF Upper Lake MISC. COMMENTS Mr. McDonald attended the Board of Review. He did not address the Board nor ask for a review of his property. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 98000 BUILDING 80000 TOTAL 178000 ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 107500 77500 185000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 13 I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Francis Fallon, Jr. ADDRESS 1050 Holly Lane PID# 35-117-23-44-0007 PROPERTY TYPE ~ SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. 1-3/4 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 3480 GROUND FLR. AREA 2322 GARAGE - A IT. 3 car DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING BATH - DELUXE FULL 2 3/4 1 1/2 1 # OF BEDROOMS 4 WALKOUT YEAR BUILT 1950 90% LOT SIZE 150 FF PORCH - GLAZED yes SCREENED OPEN DECK # OF FIREPLACES 2 LAKE SHORE Christmas Lk MISC. COMMENTS The property was reviewed in 1995. A reduction was made in 1995 based on the structure quality. The structure continues to calculate with considerable depreciation. See page 102 in 1998 sales book for a sale bordering the subject on the north. Although the structure on this sale was newer, it was considerably smaller. (see attached Addendum) VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 328500 BUILDING 135500 TOTAL 464000 ASSESSOR Tom Haller 1998 PAY 1999 410500 137500 548000 14 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/2/98 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADDENDUM Name Francis Fallon, Jr. Address 1050 Holly Lane PID# 35-117-23-44-0007 Comments: See attached sales sheet for sale on 5630 Christmas Lake Point. This sale was a smaller structure on a smaller site. 14A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 5630 CHRISTMAS LAKE PT PID#: 35-117-23-14-0009 SALE PRICE: $ 685,000 YEAR BUILT: 1968 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2270 GROUND FLR. AREA: 2270 GARAGE #1: ATTACHED # OF CARS: 3 GARAGE #2: # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S): 2 CENTRAL AIR: YES WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE BEDROOMS: 5 COMMENTS: 199710 1 STORY SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: DECK: YES BSMT. FINISHING: PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: YES OPEN: 80 % BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 2 3/4 : 2 1/2: 1 LOT SIZE: 23,500 SF J30 F;::: t INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 14B ~ ~ - .. - ....' ".~ . ~~";!;""~!l""""" IIIII!~.. till;>:..., !<i'!.i,,"" 26 -'35':':':117-23 44 0007 ;:-:."..... .'....~.ii!.~~~~~.ir.,...i.........:"'.":, 'l:'4~.:1;,"r' ,.;;.:'~.,",-~':';;t~,"""/",,, ,;,.~~:y.J. " ," . FRANCIS X FALLON JR .: \.,,~!;C:; ':;::,:;~;'Jii; '.,'. ,/:;',/;< "'.' , ' ,', .: --",.;.--'-~. . ,~.,. !,.. 2;~H~~~E:53~~::'!:";rp/"~3>.~ "'\' ~,~,'~L'~ ~ ws. :::: \,," -- -, " n' Sale Date Sale Date '.. :.:;,...~~~:\'i,:>~ Amount Amount Amount Amount Remarks: fJ JM~ 0 '()C()-IIieAlbd~ / !~~: ,.' ~ l'" -,.-' " .,' HMSTO YEAR % OWN SR YES NO 19 X J.g 1~t>&>t't'II'lol)o,AIJj;/()()~ X J '/ i I rf ~ III ){' -"} ~ (J 2. fS rv , () 0 )(. f'-' It,., , I--. C) , II I .5 ~ C 2.' ~ I .; I i'\ t1 V '6l I tJ-oooO 1 1,70P 251100 -' )( fR , I'S 4 (;) 0 0 I 1 I :5 b 0 Z.i'f 5 5 (:) C> (!))( 'R<J J .} 7 J /"~ () J.:) b .:; ~ D.~ h 0,,' 'C () e:- X qO 2.170000 I 32 ~ ob 40 2.~ 00 3' ~i~~'~~i.liiiu.. .. \... "i#I'~,*.~),",,, '~.",,; 'j.. <11 2- 4 2,OO() / :'0'70.,) 0130;00 I ~ q) ~4? tDO I 'J.t.j ';,00 (~', 7$00 'I q3 'Z~ 7000 I ZSCO~ 3'1 z C 00 y.. Cf4 2 q 3 (00 I 2500" 4 l 81 a c> x CiS 3 0 If{ S 00 , J 915 0 0 4 \.( i' 0 DO 1 ~~' 30gs~C'~.~ocq3so00 ,x: 9L J II) C> t> b I 3 0 () 0 I:> '-I '"t f) 0 0 !) ,., K 91 j 2 el50 0" :3 _1-- .... <) 4- Q, 4 ~ 0 a \X Iqg,',,;( r.f l' t> ~ o)l 3 7150' IS ~ ~ ~ 6 0 . .,; \ j . "":'j , . ,,'. , :'':: '..':,,:',:" .... '.' ,', ,l; r :<, ." n"', I:,;','" "/"':' " . 'I .' I"~ 'lit:,'" I,," :/;: ,J "i":X ':,}'i~; i,r\: V1i :,~{; i~~ :H\~ l'i I "i;; l!'i~ \/1:; :,,1' ,.>.;,i':: " '. ...: c' ",' ,..' ,J ,'L: ';r}' r :!l Jli,h _,A; W~lil;*ri ,}~~~~ ~~~.{.' ?'~h '~. ~~t, (~r; 't;5.' ~5~. ~:~ ~U' :"if t'; [~! ,I ~;f:;r"j~ ,);i11. ;.~?'\\.\ ":':;":.' <':~.:,~~!"'.' "',k~W~$hn, '~:!!.,1~H".,!. ,'i)\1 ",Ii. ':l" ,', .' ".'.~ ~> '.' I:.:'.,;.'. ,;.A; t~.q~~. \;i;ii :l,~~ !'\1;.,:,;: .~ . ij~t l.;': . ~'" lilltu ,fijllfl tbl'If' l' ~ ' iltlJ!' ~ti,,~nl1t 1~liiJl~J ;~:f:~Li~lIlfLl.~1W~I(-,;~!N l;i~ \~l' Ji~!.'li :'~~d Vr!,j {t; (Ii ~t} ft~\ ~^l ~~. it '!il:t~ :l I ~ \.. .~, . _' '''I~~'- 1~. ~.I =.f# -~ t..~ S ~ _ ~ _ .~\_ ~ ~ .!~~;~~r .J:~. .j.:... ~.:-; :~~, :.:.,;' .:~"~ _~~~~~ :',~-~: ~~~,: '.~_~ :~~ }~.~'.,~:.~ \~r. ~ ,,' :~J' ~; STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET Bf""~'A'I' " AI;:>I)',t,... i" I (:;'1)/1)(:) D ~, . .. I ':J I ' c:' .' . 1l"....V - I'V" ~"." j J',' cZ I ~I.\ - .it' :' /):o~' . -~" :~.: ~.I_f:.;-'_:....,._._ _.. HMSl!D YEAR l .r ..", '. <: IJ YES NO 19 '...., ",' /~.s I LAND LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET .. , . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ron Johnson ADDRESS 5355 Shady Hills Circle PID# 25-117-23-44-0049 PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1958 STORY HGT. BSMT. FINISHING % LOT SIZE 19600 SF GROSS BLDG. AREA 1518 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1518 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE - ATT. 2 car 3/4 1 OPEN Yes DET. 1/2 DECK TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 2 CENTRAL AIR WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE MISC. COMMENTS This property and vacant parcel 36-117-23-11-0001 (19.5 acres) are the subject of ongoing litigation. The council should make any decisions regarding this property. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~D 54000 BUILDING 80000 TOTAL 134000 ASSESSOR R. Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 54000 None 82000 136000 DATE 4/3/98 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ron Johnson ADDRESS PID# 36-117-23-11-0001 PROPERTY TYPE LR SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. GROSS BLDG. AREA GROUND FLR. AREA GARAGE- ATT. DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING BATH- DELUXE FULL 3/4 1/2 # OF BEDROOMS WALKOUT YEAR BUlL T % LOT SIZE 19.5 Acres PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK # OF FIREPLACES LAKESHORE MISC. COMMENTS See previous page 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 100000 None 100000 DATE 4/3/98 15A '" 1.~~li~';,~ ~..\ ~"; ., .~'t?:"?::'$~;~: I. ';';?:;.i,' !~::~ 7~;::;1l .,i~" ::'ss S "~c',' ~.~,:;~'~ " i 'I:-';"'~.,:.~,"",',-~, .~:),:::;; ~r " ~: .~~~. . ,,~~~ ~~~}:. I~r.~~.';.l.:.? <~~:;.< ,,_.~. "., ,: . -.. '''"k. ..-...;;....,. ..' -:..", C_'~"" ..-:~;,...:~;".~7' ~::::::-:\.:~:: I~ .'. .:':';.~~~t ;~..' i~;r~~. '- , '. 'Is",:. .~.;.. . . : -....... ":\~~: ; ~~'.~"'I>. ~~'(~~c~r:~ ~:;l:;t;;~'~ :~ .,,0_ Cl)Q r~~: :,.A:iIi \f~ .'''''--~~ W -J U a:""", ......., u..., ~ Lt'\ ~ c;)Lt'\ -J pt') -J 'N .... I J:Z ~Z X oc-O)- oc-CI?Oa: IZ<cO Lt"IX:z:.... NOCl)c;) .., ..J lI"IW Cl::lI"IU '0 ...,X NCl::Lt'\W -- 0-. ~ o o 2- ..J .,' ~ '. 12 ',' :"< .: /.',- H:! ;":', 2 " """'. 0 .:c.,,;' , ~ .'., ,""::',,',':: . ......., ." .. ,,:/' ....':. ..,,' iy:', · i >.\-, ~ ;:".=' ";L:C';'!,'.:,::;',",: '.':'; :5 ;,:':::' " ,-',. ..;. , ..' "..: a: Cl) " " ~ c-~"I :. , i,' a: ", ~~I -> "':" 00 ;t;Z ':ECDI :c~ " .!:?:..':'::":~':~;'> '. . .~;.< "".," ........ 0 '0 ~ -'Q -a 0 <\ ,::~.)}'; ~ ~ (')O 0 0 0 ~ ,., " a: t...&~'QoOo.' <;;: ........,:' . ,:;,~ i ::;d~:i :.~ ~ ~...g c.... N) - 0 ...... / .: 12 ~.....'- N ~.~ to (tJ j'.{ ........ - - - - - - ..... ....~ .e....~O ':;) 00 ID \1 ~ ',., ,.~ 0 0'""\ -'" . w .'~ . :"~ ''!WOO C\).4J. ....1 \)c ~ r.... U) '" Q C1 D ~ . . .a: .'-J _ '0 N ~ \9 t"'- C-' , .'~ 6)~ \0 1)Cl CO \' C- t :~~! .- ;(~:" ~~,."i'\ .... >~ GO::::> () <) 0 Q u (:.. ,,' ..' :!~t"X:i G \J <) () 0 0 ~ u o C 01"..... '-1) VI () <J LJ L. ~ ...Q tr l..,g <) ~ 't :)-. ~ '\'l 1<) N)! ~ ~ ::t" LO \t} UJ \J" -- .... ':<'!". " .', ',,':'.<.'.'" ,',....;':'..',/:e" '-,;"',', . ........ .;...",:.,' :E}: ",>:;'....., ~,:;--:" ,'. ir: " Cl) " '. :>< ....... ' ~';': - )~,< ~ .. :~ !~."'.~t;:~ ~ I r<: .~'Ja ~ ~ :'C.,' >- . \:r\S (J ~. v "" 0 ,:' ::;.:~:.;....:...,', t<,'i':"::"':>~" Q ~ >;"."",:""'--,-: ~ " "":',,' ">::: ! ~ 'x X ~ ')( >< 'I- ,. )< .......:.:>'::;',..:.' .!-:,:...... <., '. ~ .~ \. .'. ~tQ" 15B ~: .... ,.",,', '-. .: ';'., . , " : ~. ~ ." ,.' I. . " j<:' ..' ", ~i;1.f I':::' I',' I ' '" ,. .' -- .~.t;~; ~~; ~ ~,.~.__ I ;'~'i.'.!illi {~;,,~ '0< ,,~'--:. I.,.,,:,..:: \~I'. '., . '..' 1'::"~'1.~~:',.., :., . ".," , '",""',~ '" -- ,'...:.,.:....;i::.7"_:';:~.~:... -{,:~-. ......:...:--I.~~... .. ;.' ...', ':c::1f '. i!It --.-- "_,:,:;,'~~'r:;.- .. 'g ,:. ':.,.,; ::'=:~ ~ ... --,. ........,~;- .::- ..,. ",' '~.'~;~- ,<;'~W; .-.,~ ',i:,.t:~ .~, '. '. . _ ., :; ,";.i, .<< '0 ~,.., . 'f ~' , ';; '.'~ ':" ..':; . .'. i.C:, I ".' ,', 'c'", '.' ,-,~'~' F':~*' :~'f:;,;ltt~, ~. ~_ \1"; - ,"" I?::" ,~:::. .' "/' ::";...;.. .~ "- '- -:>~:':{ '~~~ ~ ".. '. ':::, .>::..,;~:..-' .... .;'.".(;, k>i ,~ '. ""','"'.', ,~<> ~ ..~~ , -- I..... .-- ""~. V'ti{~'I.-'~;.'" ....,. --' .. "' ~-~-~ ('-':" ~..-~. " ,"<:: .~>::-~ :~~~.. . - ',.. ..-, . 'l'-~ ~-. "--', .' - -""'i':':,,;.'-f~. .:.~.<\-.....~ ::~'I.~ .- . "C,:__ ~".:~.: .~'::::'~ -:. .,.... ':" ;,;.:", .~. -:. " ;~,_. ,..... ''';?;'~.'''' /.,,",,,,, .......,.;" ,~~"~ , I.:--...._"$~ -' .~...~. ~~ I:C:.... .'~ __., .. ..1.:',; ~~I.I.' I '" .' . :~ ;; :'g~~ ;tti .Jt '. , : :, -- '." #. 1-- ,': ,~~; ..~, , ~::~J , " .....:.. ,''-';:: - (,,;,,.[1 ~f',: I , i - - - - - - - , \ - .. - - - - - - - - .- 26 36-117-23 11 0001 FIRST BANK PLACE M7FE560 AT P MP TN ACCOUNT ING OPERATIONS PROP SCH 0 BOX A512 TYPE DIST WS Sale Date Amount , Sale Date Amount LS MN 55480 J.,L<. A14 -1- Sale Date Amount - .__m_ ___ H'U --.- Sale Date Amount Remarks: /(J ,,~5'-o ~L~.t /., ok ' ;' , HMSTD YEAR ~. OWN SR/ LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET HMSTD YEAR 0/0 OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET YES NO 19 / YES NO 19 If. / ;/ . 0" / I ~:.. () /i ,.t." I.;L t:J CJ c:J I. -S , "-" ~....' '.?.f /\.'s. If) k. r~ I:. 11 ~ R d- It' 6 '\'- 'Ir -::;J/ 1\ :, I' :Il~ 1< ~<( l'l , ,.. &, f6 D 10 ~ 0 d- O ~ 0 X ;rq ~I/ / / b . " d 0 D (. (::'. a b c x qOV /q 1/'1 pL./Cf ~ 1 'J ,..., ~ 'l /", '<1 0 :::> '1 .J U )( ql{, V 7 0 9 0 0 7 0 q 0 0 , /, _.....-,_........_~ -.......>~~ .~.'. c"' ..... "r 17 s' ~ .0 z:s 7~ '~t' '7-- :) 0 ~-..... -..-. ...-~ .~. ,~~ .......... ............ ^ ",,' -' Y<, 95' V I 0 () ,..'\ .... M' I 0 :::> ':J d C a f$ 0 It> 0 0 L I Vh T 'Z D ~ 0 b 10 D " : ,.. ~ ~., ~' @\' iv.- Ef! l'/,r' lW ;~~ M' rt.~? ,~\f}; ;il'f ~i~~, ," ~rl;' ~t ~.ffl' :~~ ~},~\"I...'t( l!~A\\y ,!~ti '~~ .~f;~ Jr::;. ~:.t ,;' ,:.~;. ~~};' r;il!'i ,1'(\ "";; I'fI!; : ~~:;l "\' ,,-;" ,1",", "f ,,' f- . , ' p 0' il -() '0 -0 "':,' ", " I ~ q3 1 D 0 0 0 0 { 0 0 0 0 0 . , ' .,. ' , . " " ... I;~l~ """I.U;",::,;' ,.,:;,,;} ;;:.: ; ;, ...: ';'" :).(;," ';.ia. ~-:'~i', " .' .. > ~~t{- ., !:r, ii' ,- ,:)' I,:.J' "/' " " l",i~~ ' ~... ;' (' " . " ~lj >,. ~l~"", ,I .,: .n ; , ' " 'to , . ..,..Ji), . '" ", ' ;~; ;,- :', . .' .:' .... : " 'Ii ",,' .~: . 'w ,'" '., " I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Maud Wadsworth ADDRESS 5460 Howards Point Road PID# 31-117-23-11-0005 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1900 STORY HGT. Rambler BSMT. FINISHING % LOT SIZE 70FF GROSS BLDG. AREA 1463 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1463 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE- ATT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN Yes DET. 1/2 DECK TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 2 # OF FIREPLACES 1 CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE Upper Lake MISC. COMMENTS See attached sales sheet. This is the only sale that has occurred in the last two years that is close in price to subject value; most sales are for substantially more. The comparable is in an inferior location on an inferior site with a smaller, inferior house. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~ 80000 BUILDING 36000 TOTAL 116000 ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 84000 42000 126000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 3877 SHORELINE DR PID#: 20-117-23-22-0006 SALE PRICE: $ YEAR BUILT: GROSS BLDG. AREA: GROUND FLR. AREA: GARAGE #1: # OF CARS: GARAGE #2: . # OF CARS: FIREPLACE (S) : CENTRAL AIR: WALKOUT: LAKESHORE-BAY: SPRING PARK BAY COMMENTS: 107,500 1920 1130 780 o o 9609 1 1/2 STORY SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: DECK: BSMT. FINISHING: PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: OPEN: 00 % BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 1 3/4 : 0 1/2: 0 LOT SIZE: 40 FF INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 16A In o Q o 0:: ~ o I"'l ~ ~~ ~ 1-4 In :%:0 !"'II-a. NO:: 10(l)Z .....:J:Q~ ~(I)O:: ~C<ca::: I<C:J:O ~:J:OI-4 I"'l ::1:(1) W ..J OW i :I:'IOU 1\\0 ..;t'X 't NS:lt'IW~ L~;:.._:.,. I I I I I I I I'" I' , I I I I" I.; t 11 r I, ~ I. I ... w ::.: a: <( :E ...l ~ o ... c c c C ::I ::I ::I ::I o 0 0 0 E E E E <( <( <C <( w a: ::l ... U ::l a: Iii -, 0 Z <( ...l --..: - . . . . .ai.a; 000 0 . . . . .' ;z;z;z ;z i a: , '" ... -- Z ;: .,.. 0 -;F. .'" .' ;:.:.~ .....if<' . 5~ .~~ /- "'Q ~:ti e ..:JC . G.w- .~ :a ,. f~,r~ ~ '. a: <(0) w.... Q..>- y 00 _ ...z '" - :E'" ~:J:~ CJ ~ I i " , j a: - "'- Z ~ 1 .~ ~. . ~. ~. :'i.: '~~ r =ii' .~ .-, ~ j .,~ :l. a~ :; oln c- ~ ~ 0) ~ ~ \0 v:. t--- :- ~ v >-.... Oci ~ to <..FJ ~ " ~ a- ~ o 00 I-Z '" ~~ ~ x. x ::;, -'If >< ~ y.... \ S 16B 1 +" \'t ( ,~ _ {'t!\ .~ :- . (") J- 'oJ ~ . '-Pi~. '( 1-'~2: .~ .~- ~~~- ~, . 'if~. .~:; ~ :-,. ~.jS ~ IJ::;~ ..~ liIi :~:,:. ":~~ ~'~ ..' "\" """ .~ ""'." or: .,;..: ..'" .c':. .,:; ..::":;':" ':Ji I. ",,-. ,- : ':'0- -'?, . ...... ..;j;\.' ~ '!,,":'; .~ <, :;~~. ?S .;'}A~ .'. ,-+y'~ ..;'~';i ....::} 1iI. '. ," :I .' .. .;.,:;. .. '.' ..... ,.,. J ~':--, .- . . '.~ c;-':' ':. ..: '" ....: I..........." '. '.i \.s) ~ r- ,J' 0) ~f ;,':'<;" a-- \J ~ -.. ;.-;: '-'" 't'';;';'''', -.." ;"~'~ ~ ;><x~)( ~ 'Y "", _-_ .~..':;:;:;~:::._;%~ ..,., I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I SUBJECT INFOR}lATION SHEET NAME David Greer ADDRESS 5185 Shady Island Road PID# 30-117-23-42-0008 PROPERTY TYPE RT. SALE PRICE S SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1 qq~ STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 0 % LOT SIZE 14500 !=:f GROSS BLDG. AREA 2524 BATH-DELUXE 1 PORCH-GLAZED GROUND FLR. AREA 1292 FULL 1 SCREENED Y99 GARAGE-ATI. 3 Car 3/4 OPEN DET. 1/2 DECK yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS .3 ,~ # OF FIREPLACES 1 CENTRAL AIR yes WALKOUT yes LAKESHORE 70FF U~r T -"lkp MISC. COMHENTS See page 116 of sales book for sale adjacent to subiect prQI)Prty- See also page 114 for sale wi thin 1 block of subi ect propertv. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 1998 PAY 1999 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND 109000 120000 No (!hrlngP BUILDING 162000 204000 TOTAL 271000 324000 ASSESSOR Tan Haller DATE 4-9 9S 17 - - - -- - - -- - - -- : :'6:!;:if~;~;~}:;v"~< ~\",., - - - - - - \ i i, ~. ....,';...., ' .' 00.". . :ji''"n';'t;l ?~ - tl2..-'6 S I 2" $' ~~q,.J 'I I ~ Ra., PROP TYPE SCH D/Sl WS Sale Date Sale Date Sa/e Date Sale Date Amount , '; Ainount .: . ,~{ '.i. ).~?ff:l'i~:i~'~~~:~~~,:4~f.~~~~f4~h~:~'~ount;: :-'/~~.;.':\' (Ll,.. 3t6 ~~ Amount Remarks: J l~i \; . --> y -.J I ~ I HM IITD YEAR % OWN SR YES NO 19 \.1' ei'r") I 0 I ' I .X r. \..-1 -, )( CjL 'I '13 'K X qi.( v.> i-- C{5 V q Ie, )( Cf7; X qg LAND 1'1" f?t::FIJ(.CO ~Nm~ 71/ ''(" I: (/ :.:(~ ".' HMSTD v YEAR % OWN SR YES NO 19 \ ) 1)." . 'ff .' < < / ")(.' ,. t,I 'i ,.. STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET LAND STRUCTURE TOTALMA / t ,,' 0 r t' i,>! ~, ~: If J D l. f) II 'r:' "~~l /\ t) C: .t:' .r ~,_' ..... 1/ I ' 1 i ~8tooo 1000 lo960d 196cC/3'7ao23~70Q lo3o~C/55CQ~25S0Q6 (O~OOdl~200021('OQO /2COJ~2040~032qICCC .\ l:.. .' :;;> I':i.: . . . ..... .\':-:c;~~.'~'.~j.;~.....tt;'.~..~.}~'... iii!(..::/':;":' ..:. }:".;: . "":" ,,': i,; ;':'..\:'/';'1 ",.;.1.,;1"/ ""....v...,' .2X:" . '.:':,...... .; . " '. :'.' .' '., " .'. I'.' .....';. .":(.,, ,"I :'fki{J~': '~~i!fr' I;,"',' ,.P.;, )': ....: .....;; ,}; V..'l"'I.."./. :\,.,\;:t~ ';";"0'1 "'. ...t.', >.<li.,.,t; '."".'. . ..' .... ,". 'i' .:.\. Ii':}' '/ .~~ ". ,:~;xr;.: it ",', ,.j.. ;;}; .~~ ..;,;. ::Y;. 'c~; ..'A.~a>..: Ail.; ;.:~.'};y' ,'r~t: '.ill; 'l1l:'~ ~4 ~~~:)~/" ~~}: {f!~. ',':< ~fti' :~;.: ~~. ~~' ~.!~ ~':.;.~~~ (1/), p.: ::i:J<~! :&l~;' ~; '::':~~ i ' ~: ~ ~~ I"': ~t.'t'i.1 .ti: ;i~. ;',(': I" ;e ~.. iIt- Jt;.~ :'~I!'.~' &" (,: ?:-1I~' 1M ~(f; ;,..". ~lf:,.'~ i~: ~:~. rfIj' . .. ~. ~JJ' ~: ~:.!IJ ~, '-'f ~ -U:-r ~"'.4 ....'. .~..... ,..,'c, .' ., .",;.' ... c' ., ',}.....:.:,i'. ...;,. ,,;!~r [;i~~\':'j';,,'.' ';:,'i<: ~',:;i 1,,:;/ I".:' 1/ .'\ " " :."; .,...~ .~.~y.:~~~~~;~::;W;,t;;f\ I'\f; ,t' l}jJ I"{~ 1\#; 1-'-:; :"'/'~'" ?:}t ';< >, , :{i;. ,ti':. ~\k. .~;>}, '\::f';~i,i' \;,',i :if,>,l',':f;':':\} ix. :;. :\' f ; i~~'~ $',:- ~t. ;~J,? r;/ .~; .'~~.. '~:.~~ 'Et If:'- ~,~~ ~;-~ ~'Jr'j.'" ;.,i .:' ~; ;~ I~>>:: ~.l~ ~'.M;: 11~, .~Il~~. ~~ ~ .~. ~.'. :b.';; Ja. .. -~- ~:: ., '.',; tlif~-.~ 11. ~~ -_~ ~. ~Vf ~( ~ fu-' :{~r "'.~ .' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Robert Carr ADDRESS 6080 Sierra Circle PID# 36-117-23-43-0023 PROPERTY TYPE B:..- SALE PRICE $400,000 SALE DATE 7120/90 YEAR BUILT 1990 STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 50% LOT SIZE 25,625 sf GROSS BLDG. AREA 3072 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes GROUND FLR. AREA 2032 FULL 1 SCREENED GARAGE- ATI. 3 car 3/4 OPEN Yes DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKE SHORE MISC. COMMENTS Letter from owner states value increased from 1997 to 1998. Value actually decreased. See sales book page 82. This comparable is next door to the subject and is similar in style, size, and age. It is on a similar lot and has no basement finishing. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 105000 BUILDING 333000 TOTAL 438000 ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change 1998 PAY 1999 97000 356000 433000 DATE 4/3/98 18 ~ I - - 1_______ - - --. - .. ~ .__u"' - ------ ."111-" -- - ----.--. --- .:. ~~r?}1~.. ,:: f: .,'. . ., '-,', - - - r:;" ,,<.-'V' -'-,.~,./ ~,.'/ - - - .f t6' -36:117-23-43-0023 890076 - uct f 1111 PROP SCH -r-20-qO 40C. 000; Lundgren Bros Construction TYPE DIST WS Sale Date Amount , , Sale Date Amount 6080 Sierra Cir Shorewood, tfl 55331 ~ 27 b '" Sale Date Amount lMeetwater At Near titn. 3rd 4 2 Sale Date Amount ,-------- ----------- ----- Remaiks: ~_.-._- -- 91 -~r",v'fJ (/7000 ) r; \1\ Q $ \\,.( loo,,'Lt S8 A (.. C] {) I ~,.1 I.J.." ..r. - I ,-'L.? '). ;.' ( ';,}.. '7 $ () <:) <:) t . HMSTD YEAR % OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET HMSTD YEAR YES NO 19 YES NO 19 0/0 OWN SR LAND STRUCTURE TOTAL MARKET . X cg g :; ., ".... 0 3 b r.,.- 0 0 X " r: t.. ,.., 0 "'< ~ 0 0 I~ ')( 190 7 (. .. '.. ,) 2 ') '3 () 0 () '2 It I~ 0 0 0 w .... X q, 7 0 0 0 0 1.. q 0 0 0 <) J fe, 0 D 0 0 ~ ^ 1d- - 0 6 :J. r" Cj 0 "- J I~ (., I~ () c ,''' J 0 0 '-I u l,.i IX 'f"?> -- c 0 b 0 "3 " I 0 0 ~ l3 1 J 0 0 0 , X ( "I 7 ~ () ~ () ~ D S- O ~ Q ~ J ~ 0 0 0 X it: 5 "l , I 0 0 J () 7 'e. 0 i.) J q J l 0 0 II - .... ~ d -- I I~ " .1, I I l- I I I f{~ -~ ,.. "" "'ll ".-, - ~.'. 1.>6, 1..;.:, ~,;;.~ " ,-; . ': ",: ~" ; !I I - , ", ~i " .~ ,'. i ' ~ ..'..... , - ""'" I -IT " - '. .',"',' ~ C,7 .' 3 3,( - ~ ...... I ~ C; ~ C 3 4 3 - - ...... 0 I( J .J J X qZ 9 7 (j <' 0 3 S b 0 P 0 4 3 J 0 0 0 , , " ~ ,'. -' . - ',' 1'3,,; ,/ :'c -:,;- -'. ,< , ", I: ..- " -:'. ',' !\ ":",i.-. "-' . " . 1:,"'\ , " " :'i~' . .-,'---:;:';:::, .;,,:, ":{ ';r~~b -.';,itl::' ,\~t;;::' -. -' " ": ,\ .' " "fii ,.?, ':.:f" ":/\i;~:. ;'\\\.;'(i. :- ,," .: -- .. Hr;;' . , _: -', -, I --,,:,,;..,, '.j;':" "'->i , .......; (, .' . - ti ,",." II ~,' '~ ;~~~( :i> ,~\- :~~. f);k' lu~ .'1' j:~j~~' :~Yi~~! {~i( ; .~ H'j :.;{ ,;1~' \{.. -',: ;,} .. ~ ;1 :t,. {I i-;~~ :"f: I', ~, 'f j,~~ ~;it .:.." . 't;,: ';', " 'i~i.': '; ~:,: '.~:~. ; :. ':.'. " L , '~'1' ,-..' W ,I,! 'Y:.:: 'Ii' ....i ~.;! !'" 'f,l "i..~!\t "'; '. ., ,- ,I. "1. ~i' ., ,~ .\. ..\-;.,.;......., .,"1 .'.", ':/ ~ ~ ~ ~I: il J.li!.; ;it ll: ~, qfl, Iii -it ~ 1M, &t &J. ,~ ~ ~', -M! fi; ~t l~ ~ .',\. Ji', ~'1Ji; ~: ~~ ~ 'l1; iii :.: ~M .1ll :_~~;; ; . i ~_:.- .till, '.~:I ~: !i!~ .~. . '- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Amy and Tarald Kvalseth ADDRESS 4980 Shady Island Circle PID# 30-117-23-24-0005 PROPERTY TYPE RL SALE PRICE $ STORY HGT. 1-1/4 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 1580 GROUND FLR. AREA 1440 GARAGE- ATT. DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR YEARBUILT 1915 LOT SIZE 150 FF PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN SALE DATE BSMT. FINISHING no bsmt BATH - DELUXE FULL 1 3/4 1 1/2 1 # OF BEDROOMS 3 WALKOUT DECK # OF FIREPLACES 1 LAKE SHORE Phelps Bay MISe. COMMENTS Has small guest house. See sale on page 112. This sale is an old house in need of maintenance on a smaller site with less front footage. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 LAND 141000 BUILDING 50000 TOTAL 191000 ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 180000 50000 230000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 19 I I <f~ '~r: ',~.,* I, I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I ~i .; .~~~ I~;;'~;. I........ ........ .~ .. .~..:~t.. ~ .~..- ;~ .'~'~' ~'~,:; ~ li , "~!i'~' ,-,... ~~!r~}~: "'.:"Cii'"iil ~'ii -i,(/).(/) : .(/): (j) ~. ",'~iI <.0 a. ;,a:>.. d:a. .... -~ i;,.~~:;,:< ~. ... . ',~ !'C " b .'; - ... . '.' '. w "" ~, a: ~ ~ .'. ~ ~: .: . ';~:",,--, ., .::.. _-C..':. ~:.:. . O' ..':: ....... Z :".~ .... . ,..,.' . ,,c" '.: ...:"..< '.V: a: .' (/) ...... ..i'.: :L.. I .' .~. ...............:.. ..(:"1 ~:#.:~i" ,/.' <x\ ". .... .' . a:.", :,. :;. ~.~. y:.!'.... .......-....;.: I... ,;;:".. ...1.... 00.., '. Zc.. . ~! ;..;~,.I'::;:.:.I....:.. ".' !.:~h' i.tO li''\:~ '0("\ () - :-~':-'Olo '0 Q .~ -C':l ~ ~. 'Io~ :~ t'C) ~ . c ..~ ~ .to .' ;i: ,{~ . ,:0 ~ 0- \.. "(io.. --.:f fP ..1:), .:.'.~ .,'ij' ;to "'t" " ~I~ r-: ;:' :t::.;: -- - -- ....... --;;;;;;; - - >-<." . .,~ '\) ~ () \""' 11 0 n ;,:.~.; '-'.9 ~ ~ ~ 0 .t:\ 0 r.J n ~.~ :"0 N()" () ~ .::r f) . i';~ .:~.~ ;~ ~ N '..... . Jii.. .~ \I) ~ ~ 'j.. .~ ~.~ ~. ;}~.: \~:'.::\'.. '~- ~~: ~.X) ...<:) I. ..~ Q In \ ~ ("\() f>>, .$) '.:> " () ('\ <:) '.J () :'o~ U' '-.; <; -0-- '0 \~ 'l) ll") :~:' ,~I~ j) - j" ~ ('A <<), t~Y .....;: .~ . ~.~~Ii~ ~ ~ ~ .:...a:. ........ I .' ..0':<.. .' ;.~\.:,~;..Is 1-:. ;:..,.,: ~;;i. ........;> ":f!~:;:' ;'-~? '~:'::.:.. ., a:~~.~.~ ~~I~ ::J-.\11 ~.i.!J:':<:c.:~: ,.,...... \.~ 'W- ~ 6"" ~ ':'0 ~....,.:i ':'!!<." , .~v . ~ ~ >t iz~,,,,,^' .1 , :if!..: "'C, 1'.1:' .~ .j ~.. '-19A ~ -1 ,.;"....... ....c. :.'.", . .' .:~:: '. I:.~,,;.,,;:'..:..- ,'" ::.3].' '.i:~ ..'::: h:;-T i~~ " ., ....~.:. -~i ,,":.,-:_, "_':-,-7; 1-:- ,:.~. :;g~ .. .~." . ..' ..: .....</ Ii ;.;" ~~~. -'i;' '"'. ';*~<, .. . :..;;::; :..".;I!;.....1&. . .. ~~~?'Il'~ :~ '. .-.... .:\ P.~ ,:.: .~~ "-';~ ...~.""". " ::..:' I;.,>""".~'iii!i: <?~' ~ ~', ..; <;<.;;~" ~.. - .' ':'\!:;:; ~'._1' ......:+~ :;~ ....-.;.::..... Is ."Co '"-' .... _~;, ':~ : '.' I:'. <' ......... I';,~;' ,./ ....1.:-: . ..\,?; ",;'< "",'~"'r',;' " ,.:...'.....1 ~1?a'~ ....i..':. cT,-~;:;~..(~~""' (')1'" ;>..:~~jj_ .... _ ....... :.'~~; .&<%I<;i ",..o:a.~ ...... '-.. .. ..:~~',~.' ....""..,.,~ "~'.. ~ " ~ .....'....f"::.: ~.;.. : 'C""--!n~.~ fT"" 1"l'I., .....':".~. 'e. ; " ~v..:'- \1J '. . ,''''l>' ._.~.... "Ao_ , . " I .k""'03<;i:.:~ .. :~,..~ ..'. 1.'i.'Ii': ~.,-i"'_ .~ ". ';"~ I~ I"'. }~ .~. "".,'''' ...L""\ I ^ ~ ~I.' ;.' .'1='.' . I '" I.t;~':~ ~;;;':' . 0 C"'o.." '. ;~-;<..;..,~",J. " :'. .'-' ....". "'.,:,~ '''-''''''<'. . " v..... . .. "'" ~ .." ''''!'..~ . .~ .'.-',s '.~~.~,~ ." ;~t~~ ~ ,() .) -;'0::'\ ;'. . ;.' ,,,;; " ,,,;: ~ ....-.,.,.:"'..... ~.... ~ ,........ .., i+-- f.... ~:q-:- 0< ;~......... '.' 'C- f."'''''''' .'. ~:~". .' .' ". /;. .' '. ...,......n~. ...~.: ....:..... <..!,:/ ':.- ,,;;'C ~ ..If;;'..~ \.:r -: 0" '.,::~ :~\ .><..< .:;: ." :.. .'.Ii' ,. ..' ,: . .... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Amo Windsor ADDRESS 4940 Sussex Place PID# 25-117-23-23-0057 PROPERTY TYPE RZ SALE PRICE $300325 STORY HGT. 1 story GROSS BLDG. AREA 2224 GROUND FLR. AREA 2224 GARAGE - ATT. 2 car DET. TUCKUNDER CENTRAL AIR SALE DATE 8/94 BSMT. FINISHING BATH- DELUXE FULL 1 3/4 2 1/2 1 # OF BEDROOMS 2 WALKOUT 30% YEAR BUILT 1979 LOT SIZE PORCH - GLAZED SCREENED OPEN DECK yes # OF FIREPLACES LAKE SHORE yes MISC. COMMENTS Property at 4875 Regents Walk in Amesbury sold for $325,000 in 10/96 and has 2250 sf and is slightly older than the subject. This property was purchased in August 1994 for $300.325. VALUATION 1997 PAY 1998 L~ 95000 BUILDING 183000 TOTAL 278000 ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson 1998 PAY 1999 95000 183000 278000 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No change DATE 4/3/98 20 < I.... .. .....' ,. .' --. ~ -. '. ',':; .. ..' ]: - - " , .~ '. , . .... '. ; .. ._. : ., , .::-~ " - ..~.~::. .Ni'~ ~ , .'.' . I /, '1 "...< '.. :: .... i.~. :'>' ....J:-. ,C" .... ..........;~.> ...... :'~~'1:" 1: ...',..:." :....:1.: ....:s.; '.:~ ....,""" k~oE 'c, I i .~~. ,'j{/ I ......, :..' .' . \f' ~ I ~.:.;. ..~". ,\;:Z' ".~. ~ y I:,..~'.c ,..:' .,,::; '2 '.' ,..c..;. <1, ;.1 I::' <..,.. I....:.'... -- 'fi" IZ :"':.' .- .:-.... Oil' .' i::.. .1#:1 S ~. ':"~\ ..::':< ..... . "", :""::. .. ;;" '. :.:.' .:.. >." >.:: I~~ I: '. , ., ~ :oS' ::. ;.' ......,:.-/, J ~ I - m C~?... t) !,~- ~ I;~r ~~'i." .....;~;a 11!:~~1:~; : ,.~.I;it~".: ;;}"j;.)..:....>:.~: 0 r....r:;::~{ ::,~~; I~j~~ '<} :......L~.~;.~.-.t{g Z If~~<./~~~~ ~i~. ~ ;;;..,>:.::,;<:~~:,;,,?:,..~~ : ~" 7<<,,':'i'~:::.f" :{'~<;'';\;~./>:2~.'\: . 0 it U ~ 0 ~ 4 C .{): . i:~";'ctt~~~ I !~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~! . ::',"'.c: .. 0 0 <:) loon i. ~ QIIi::. ;;;.,. Wa: '.~ <) a 0 () () ; () .~, ~f ,>;;:. .. "." s cot)...s> 0 n ~ ,.... '~L.:: " .":,,p'~~. ii! ~ - - 0 0 ~ r 0 . ",,~{/::<:,::"}:'f<;"'" to .ill ~ ~ r- ,......a rf. tf) '. S:;'; :T ;:'::::~;;;:':';.;}]i:....~.'!t.,.,.>. ..>',-: - . - - - - .". -. \; : - ~'i"'P' "':'." "'n 0 9 0 ('\ () {j 0 ("~":-":;';".. -:::. 0 0 0() n 0 0 Q ~ i '. 0 1''' C> <0 t'1 0 () ~ -..- >.. ';;'>,:;:.,:.:-'> ~ 0.<) ~ OJ - \'3 WI N) : .. -. ~~')';":';'~'/!"~k~2:j ',:: .~:f':::r- '\r " \0 a::: \1"'"', ,~. occ; .::. .,::~,. .... . . >,-" ' , .. a: .. '''':;j.m. .' W a: ~. :;) ~ : . '. '. 0 ~ : 1:.7'.......:... ,";"":'::' ,",.; /- I 1,- I '1 1 I I $ ~~ ~ ; 0 ,.., !""l I""l LLlII'\ N:EUll"l r< " I""l~' -J :'l N Q. :.i, Z @ ,...., <)( E ~ """ ~ LLl ~~~(I)O ;; '1'(1)0 i ~i~~~o ~ '" ... .~ '0 0.. J: N ~ en i" . . -' .,~.'. ~~; ,+'.: !" .- n-- ~'.~io: ~ (\ .tv) .,. ~ ~ ~ >- .'.'y..:. <.!"- c:s- 0-- 0- ,,~ .... .:.1." . . ''c:. .J -}....:'''.,' . 00 ....z ,>,>..' !~ ~.~ ~ X ~ 'J... x X .: 1~ig::~;;\.:.'~.,~:.>...... .......\ .~:~!~$f;;~~~,~ii;:.!t~:~~~~..,'~....:.. -J .{ 20A > . " . '""." :;~; .~ ....-J :;'-f,:', ~: -::~~ ~.,...bl,","'~ ..-;..... -_."",.,,~ ~~'" ~~I .' "." .~:i;~~;._ ......... .:~;:~,.:;:.~ :>~': ,...... j"/ 8~~;, ..... ..; ,,~, '." :.'; ......,....,.. '~. ......... .",.:.l"d'~.-. . :~ --.:.~:~. .,,~~ '+~1- " . ..,.;..;. .~ ~ """<; - '. ," .. :-,--, ." :~~!fJ~:~ .~. .,.,~ ~. .<. ./' ;.~~._.~ :,~~ ~.,,,,~~ .' I/.:',,;#.R: ~i .l""......d.. . ...;'if<:j;i;~'~ ., ','.' -;i;:;<; ~~.~ !../ .;.:;t ..~_liiIiiJ . .. .?Y~~ !~.. :... ". ..:,.... I)' .< ,:; I""" ; . .::~;. <~ ',,, :..:c: .' ,'..< .'. I) 1 ,.:'. . :..:.:..~ ;'-'~~', ~._~.. "~.;.,' .. '.' I;:;{;f'. ~ _... : ...;,..,1..... ~..." ,.... ~ .;. 1":,#.1'''':' :~.~. :, -~-:-,-". ":':-~<"~'" :;.~~~ ~~ ~" -....; -.; '". .', liii \~I~"'" ..,.....~. I ....< '":.~~~.,. __ . . . .....;.....: .'.".z>.:.\~.~' '. ''-:..- :".~-- ":~~{"" .~ ,~. .....c..... ....""'.~. ~ . iMJ . ;: "?:;~... ~~{ ." ~ .;. .."".;:.:~l~;~. ............ ...'.;..:........,.......I~~ ''''-(:;~;' :~~: r_~ :';;..;'" .. : _.;-....-' ....:1.:."..'.._............. ... I..:"'".. :;~. ~, :,' . . ,....:.'i.~.. " ...: .. ":" '~"'. . ..:,../.,. .~. .1.-' .. .>';~:.I!~ ",:' ; "'3d .'.~~~I.'- .-' ,'.'O.i;''''', ,,~; a'. .~.~ atll "'1 . . '. : ..... . ")';; ......:..';, '.: ::.;'.,<j~-; ~J.~ ~".';;."';.' . ~ .:~~~::. ~..., ... ,.;. ;.,'c," .',.. ...... ..:.;; I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Betty Norton ADDRESS 23730 McLain Road PID# 34-117-23-23-0030 PROPERTY TYPE ~ SAL PRlCE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1973 STO Y HGT. Rambler BSMT. FINISHING 80% LOT SIZE 18731 GRO S BLDG. AREA 1144 BATH- DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED GRO FLR. AREA 1144 FULL 2 SCREENED G GE - ATT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN DET. 1/2 DECK CKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES RAL AIR No WALKOUT No LAKESHORE . COMMENTS Property was reviewed in March 1998 and found to be in average overall cond tion. See attached sales sheet of sli tl smaller rambler with a sin Ie car tuckunder ara e. Also see s les book a e 8. This is located a ramb er with slightly superior amenities. 1997 PAY 1998 48500 74500 123000 ASS SSOR Rolf Erickson RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION No 1998 PAY 1999 53500 76500 130000 change DATE 4/3/98 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS: 23630 MCLAIN RD PID#: 34-117-23-23-0032 SALE PRICE: $ 130,000 YEAR BUILT: 1955 GROSS BLDG. AREA: 1092 GROUND FLR. AREA: 1092 GARAGE #1: TUCKUNDER # OF CARS: 1 GARAGE #2: SALE DATE: STORY HEIGHT: DECK: YES 9609 1 STORY BSMT. FINISHING: 30 % PORCH-GLAZED: SCREEN: OPEN: BATH-DELUXE: 0 FULL: 1 3/4: 1 1/2: 0 LOT SIZE: 21,708 SF # OF CARS: 0 FIREPLACE(S) : CENTRAL AIR: YES WALKOUT: YES LAKESHORE-BAY: COMMENTS: INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 21A I' ,- I:.'. ;. , Ii I I ~~; I.. .. I" I ~ ...:.... ",;~:t;=':... ~ "3};': Vi:~:: f.':'- I I~ IF l} -': I. ~, It 0 tj:; 1'1') .0 ~ 0 'CCCC ::> ::> ::> ::> o 0 0 0 E E E E < < < < c z < ..J - .' CD' CD CD ~ a: .. -;. Ci ~ UJ cc c CD CD CD CD GiGi Gi Gi z UJUJ UJ UJ 3: 0 UJ ~ lY) 0 3: J a: <0> -...a w- >- B~ ~ cO (/)0 ~ ...z ;,; UJ "'" ::i:UJ o.w ~ li :t:W 00. e >- f~ ! Iii :.:: a: < ::i: ..J ~ 0 ... i """ 1'1') 1'1') I"l It\ NZ It\ . 00 JI"lt-~ I'N~ ~.,.t'~ ~ ~ .~; '<C """t.!l~0 "I. UO I ..:t:EEO I'I').<C 3: :. Mlt'\W ~.I"l~ ;..11'-0 'OMI"l::J: I ....~__3 N~ "iiii~~ '.~...:..'.:_.- _. .c I:~~:':<:-" . w :.::. a: < ::i: ..J ~ o ... I~ I~ I' . ..~ ,';:'k!I 'JFI .,_~;~i :j W a: ::l ... U ::l a: ... UJ ;~ I~ ii' . .,'.,,:?.it:.~ .. ".,,". '~"I~ . .'.'. .~*-,"'r ~ .c,:,,~ .~ '. ;,",.,h'r. ,:::. ~ :~ bft.. ~. .. .. ~" ~ ,. 1* .~ :t~~,: tJ. .' ; '''" '..' .' ~.;;;: L<-,", . .::&.....~r-r,I!;I ::~;.~ '.~ ~~ ~,~~;s .--, :~:.~ ....L '''iY -~.~ ;<::-:;-'~ " ~ . I}f~ -.-<., . ~-::...:..~.~. " -' -~:_~~~~ -:.:..:'::::.: ~. _. .' ~;'.~'. g?r: :'. -;;. .~.~;~~"" ~...,'- ~~. ~.1: .C' ;I'<~S'~~";'" z&.f:.t 'j'- ......: ';"::~;- . c'c,: '_"'"", I . t:: 0..... 1.=1 - I:?:;~~ ;~ rill. ". ,.;;;:.0.., ;'~iii: ~ .;:;~:~-~~ ~ . . ,''-''':B';;~~ ~ C1 0 <:) 0 ~ 0 c~) - I.'() 0 0 0 <) .o:::.,....,t :~ ~ ~O~ ':'JO()<'\~ n '00 000....;,: ...... ~::T ~ :-t IJ) I'() tv) , 0 r-l c fl 0 () .O"~. :"~, ~ ~ ~ r- ':::) (-.'"'1 to r() _ ~ r- .,.." Vl t'O,-;L,.:~~. ~~r~~~~~~~Q~-~_NM:'~~~ .. - - - ....... - - -~< ?--::~ ~ C 0 a .~ 0 (')0 '.) 'th 0 () ("\ (, '0 () OJ- ~ ~ '\) <:)0 (j <)0 ()C\::)~ o'Oc ( '\) 00 ;,.:-;~ ~. ~ ........ - ;;:;- IS-... U rC M ~).~ Q -.:::: {) n) c;:)U: ~ .~,:.;.,,;..:j~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ V1 ~ Q't' r{) -10 O!~ riJIa- Q (jJ - ~ ~ ~'5." .s~_~ t;; ~ \i:: \J! t..r ~ --9 ,,-,::"....s ~ ~, ..91 V' r- ..9 "I \.';;.::'~ ;~ '.. .. .. "'~.~ .~~ \\ () 0 () ~ Q () ~ 0 f~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ CJ 0 -,2:, I ,;:~ ~ ~ () c ~ () "- ( C'\ o!~ Q 0 c oJ ~ QQ' . "'. '?;E !i "0 ~ ~ '" N' IJ 0 ~ oJ' << <:l -S1 ~ U () lJ t.,{) - :5 ~ ....s:I t'- f1\ ~ ~ (C\ - ~ v - ~ cO ':II (J M ....~;. ;J);;: ~ " I""" ~ <"'6 C"i'l N r<) "f) ~..". 'J I:J" . ~ ~ .::r ~ \J) .:o(ij c~.'5'; ~ ~ .'>il.1II -- ....:..:~:;:; .cc;;, '.. .... ..... ..' a: UJ .~ '- ~ ~0>;I) ..... r- ...>:::" 0'-- ..... - - ~- ~ ~ XI-'XJ (f- 0- ~ z ~ ~ o .. ("t) -. ~ ~I~ ~~&: ~1'2; - cO ...z UJ ::iUJ X :t:W >- -: :Cr.:' t"...:.... . ..".; ::"!"E y. X )<: )C ~'"Y-. i ')( ..:~ :;::, ~ ..j ~....J';~::'~<l:': . )~')<><x>< -o..~ 21B Executive Summary for Council Meeting April 13, 1998 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item #8: David E. Johnson, owner and manager of Floors Plus, Inc., has asked to speak with the City Council concerning snowmobiling, David Perkins watermain job, traffic light at County Road 19 and Smithtown Road, expansion of the Floors Plus Inc. building, drainage from the Smithtown Crossing shopping mall, and a Naegle sign. Agenda Item #9 A: The only Council member that had suggestions regarding the latest version of the park and trail questionnaire was Kristi Stover. She suggests that questions 33 and 34 be removed from the survey. I ask that any Council changes or recommendations be made at this meeting so it can be relayed to the Park Commission at their meeting Tuesday, April 14. It is the intention that the document that comes out of that meeting will be the final document. Agenda Item #9B: As a result of discussions during the April 6, 1998 work session, the Council may want to give direction to staff regarding the establishment of neighborhood organizations. Agenda Item #9C: The Council should discuss and give direction to staff regarding how to fIll the . Planning Commission vacancy. Staff will have hopefully contacted each of those candidates who were interviewed in January to determine their interest in the Planning Commission prior to the Council meeting. . v ,~'\ .~ . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 16, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. 1. MINUTES CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DRA~~;1 Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7 :07 p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers O'Neill and Garfunkel; Planning Commissioners Kolstad and Champa; Administrator Hurm; Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Councilmembers Stover and McCarty B. Review Agenda The agenda was approved as presented. 2. DISCUSSION OF LAND CONSERVATION ISSUES AND CITY'S INVOLVEMENT Administrator Hurm distributed handouts relative to protecting the community's natural resources. The group then viewed a video tape relative to "Keeping Open Spaces for Tomorrow." Dean Riesen, 20030 Excelsior Boulevard, President and General Partner of Carlson Real Estate Company, spoke relative to conservation contribution and easements. Mr. Riesen distributed a handout to the group relative to this issue. Mr. Riesen stated a conservation easement was utilized in the Harbor Woods development in Plymouth. He explained this particular parcel was irregularly shaped. Half of the property was guided for multi family and half for single family residential. All of the surrounding property had been developed years prior. The City ultimately allowed higher density on the single family portion of the property. In addition, a portion of the multi family space was utilized for single family. A donation of a conservation easement was made on the remaining property which was designated multi family. This allowed a substantial tax deduction equal to the full market value minus the value of the property with the conservation easement. Mr. Riesen stated the property has minimal value given the perpetual conservation easement which was placed on it. He felt this experience was positive for the city, the property owner and the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Riesen reviewed the IRS guidelines relative to conservation contributions and easements. He also reviewed various conservation purposes. Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether stormwater management would qualify as a conservation purpose. Mr. Riesen felt stormwater management would qualify as a purpose. l~fr CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 - PAGE 2 ,~ ~ Commissioner Champa inquired what would happen to the easement in the event the property were sold. Mr. Riesen stated this becomes a part of the deed, is permanent and cannot be revoked. In exchange for a tax deduction, the property owner would lose development rights to the property and it would have to be left in its natural state. These rights do not expire at any point in the future. Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether the property owner would still have the ability to mow and maintain the property. Mr. Riesen explained a provision such as this could be included in the easement document. The property could be sold, however, the easement would stay with the property and the new owner would not be able to do anything contrary to the easement. Nielsen inquired whether the City could at some point release the development rights since the City is the beneficiary of the easement. Mr. Riesen explained to qualify for the IRS tax deduction, the City would have to give up the right to reverse this. Mr. Riesen felt one of the most important pieces of the conservation easement to be the educating of property owners and the willingness of the City to assist property owners through the process. Councilmember O'Neill stated this is one tool and he felt a variety of tools should be made available to address an assortment of situations which exist in Shorewood. Mayor Dahlberg felt the two most valuable tools to be conservation easements and land acquisition. . Councilmember O'Neill felt there to be other options available as well. Mayor Dahlberg felt the City could help residents understand and apply the tools which are available. Commissioner Champa felt the tools must be marketed to the community to determine whether there is an interest in this type of program. Mayor Dahlberg suggested the programs could be made known to the community and anyone wishing to utilize one of the tools available could receive assistance from the City. Mr. Riesen suggested targeted marketing may be appropriate. Mayor Dahlberg felt a good communication strategy would be for someone such as himself to go through this process publicly. Councilmember ONeill noted the Park Commission would like to obtain more park land and one way to achieve this would be for the neighborhoods to purchase the property, giving the first option to the City in the event they wish to sell the property at some point in the future. Mayor Dahlberg raised the issue of the golf course and stated his belief everyone would like to see the corporation which owns the golf course benefit to the fullest possible market driven extent. He felt there may be tools available in which the City could plan in advance for what might happen with the golf course in the future. Mayor Dahlberg explained as property values in Shorewood increase, there will be a point at which the property will be worth more developed than being utilized as a golf course. He suggested the Planning Commission review the matter. Hurm noted the IRS places limits on the use of deductions so that in any single year, the taxpayer can claim a deduction for an amount only up to 30 percent of the taxpayer's adjusted gross income. Excess deduction amounts can be carried forward over the next five years. He pointed out this could be beneficial to people with a $40,000 or $50,000 deduction. Mayor Dahlberg pointed out for a property owner who is many years away from retirement, they would receive the net present value of the funds at this time, however, they must be disciplined and committed to investment. . . . r~ CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 - PAGE 3 Councilmember O'Neill noted there had been discussions in the past relative to holding a referendum to ascertain whether the residents would be in favor of paying an additional tax for the next couple of years which would allow the City to purchase green space. He felt a referendum should be carried out as quickly as possible. Mayor Dahlberg noted his agreement stating his belief the residents of Shorewood are interested in preserving as much green space as possible of what is remaining. Mayor Dahlberg suggested formulating a committee which would address this issue and formulate a plan as quickly as possible. Mr. Riesen felt possible a CPA as well as other professionals should be included on this committee. Mayor Dahlberg felt the Planning Commission could work with staff to develop the makeup of the committee. He explained his management objective in this regard would be to speed up the process as much as possible. Hurm reminded the Comprehensive Plan must also be taken into consideration and a determination made whether this matter fits into that plan. Mayor Dahlberg felt the residents could immediately be educated on this process through articles in the Sun Sailor as well as the monthly newsletter. In addition, he would be willing to publicly work through the process himself as an example to the citizens. Hurm inquired if the City were to reject the idea of an easement being donated to the City, would the property owner have the option of donating an easement to an entity such as the Park Foundation. Mr. Riesen noted this would be another option. Hurm stated the City may want to establish some criteria in this regard. Mayor Dahlberg did not feel the current Council would reject any conservation easement which would be offered. Nielsen pointed out the City would not incur any costs through the conservation easement process. Commissioner Kolstad suggested looking at ways to change the zoning ordinances to maintain the characteristics of Shorewood through the use of green space, setbacks and percentage of hardcover among other things. Mayor Dahlberg stated the Planning Commission will need to research this matter and provide recommendations for the consideration of the Council. Mayor Dahlberg felt the issues which need to be addressed by staff and the Planning Commission include fine tuning the ordinance, coordinating the changes with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the committee which is being established and its efforts. Mayor Dahlberg felt setting up a small committee and beginning the planning of an educational process should take place as soon as possible. Mr. Riesen stated he would be happy to volunteer as the chair of the committee which is to be established. Mayor Dahlberg expressed his appreciation to Administrator Hurm for his interest and work on this issue. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 - PAGE 4 3. ADJOURNMENT Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded to adjourn the City Council Work Session Meeting at 8:55 p.m. Motion passed 3/0. RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR .-. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDA Y, MARCH 23, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING [D~AFT Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7 :04 p.m. A . Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill and Garfunkel; Administrator Hurm; City Attorney John Dean; Planning Director Nielsen Absent: Councilmember McCarty B . . Review Agenda . Mayor Dahlberg read the Agenda for March 23, 1998. The agenda was approved as presented. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes - February 25, 1998 Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes of February 25, 1998, as amended on Page 3, Paragraph 4, Sentence 4, change to read, "the additional cost over a period of time was marginal. " Motion passed 3/0. . . B. City Council Joint Work Session Minutes - March 2, 1998 Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Joint Work Session Minutes of March 2, 1998, as amended on Page 1, note CounciImember McCarty was absent; Page 2, Paragraph 3, Sentence 3, change to read, "product research is about features"; Page 6, Question No. 38, Paragraph 4, change to read, "that if support of the trail is a function of proximity, it could imply additional branches"; Page 7, Paragraph 7, Sentence 1, change to read, "contemporary product research methods which would be faster and more efficient. " Motion passed 3/0. C . City Council Work Session Minutes - March 7, 1998 Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Work Session Minutes of March 7, 1998, as amended on Page 1, Item 2, Paragraph 7, Sentence 1, change to read, "effective NURP ponds," and Sentence 2, change to read, "there are water quality alternatives which should be investigated"; Page 2, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3, change to read, "this might be an expensive approach." Motion passed 3/0. !&!? CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 2 D. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - March 9, 1998 Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of March 9, 1998 as submitted. Motion passed 3/0. (Councilmember Stover arrived at 7: 10 p.m.) 3. CONSENT AGENDA Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving the Motion on the Consent Agenda and adopting the Resolutions therein: A. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-022, "A Resolution Approving a Biennial Gambling License for American Legion Post #259 B. A Motion to Approve an Extension of a Deadline for Recording a Subdivision Applicant: Charles Oberg Location: Christmas Lake Point Properties . C. A Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 98-023, "A Resolution Approving a Temporary Gambling License for the Southshore Center, 5735 Country Club Road" Applicant: Southshore Center Location: 5735 Country Club Road . Motion passed 4/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 5. PARKS Report on March 17 Park Commission Meeting Administrator Hurm reported on the March 17, 1998, meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed . in the minutes of that meeting). 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative Planning Director Nielsen reported on the March 17, 1998, meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation Applicant: Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc. Location: 23505 Smithtown Road Dennis Pipkorn was in attendance and addressed the issue of the proposed fence. He requested the Council approve the alternative to Item 2.f. of the proposed resolution relative to the fence. Councilmember O'Neill pointed out the reason the Planning Commission raised the issue of the fence was to screen the materials which are being stored on the property. It was pointed out the proposed fence will not actually screen the materials being stored. \ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 3 Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concern if the fence is not made a requirement at this time and the property is ultimately sold, the City would not have the ability to require the new property owner to install a fence. In addition, if the building were removed, there would be no mechanism which would require the addition of a fence. Attorney Dean suggested requiring the applicant be continuously responsible for screening the storage materials from the adjoining properties as required by the ordinance. Councilmember Stover inquired whether this provision will encompass County Road 19 as well as commercial and residential properties. In addition, Mr.Pipkorn expressed concern relative to screening materials from County Road 19. Nielsen explained there would be approximately 10 feet which needs to be fenced. . Mr. Pipkorn felt this provision would be acceptable. Nielsen suggested the following wording for Item 2.f. "The applicant shall be responsible for screening the storage of outdoor building materials as needed from adjoining properties, including public right-of-way, as required by City Code. Building materials shall be stacked no higher than six feet." O'Neill moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-024, "A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation for Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc., 23505 Smithtown Road as amended to reflect: "The applicant shall be responsible for screening the storage of outdoor building materials as needed from adjoining properties, including public right-of-way, as required by City Code." Motion passed 4/0. B . A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact Regarding a Conditional Use Permit Applicant: Minnetonka Country Club Location: 24575 Smithtown Road Dahlberg moved, Stover seconded directing staff to prepare a Findings of Fact Approving a Conditional Use Permit for the Minnetonka Country Club, 24575 Smithtown Road. Motion passed 4/0. . C. A Motion Directing Staff to Prepare a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat - Mary Lake Addition Applicant: O'Dell Tinnesand Location: Yellowstone Trail Stover moved, Garfunkel seconded directing staff to prepare a Resolution approving the preliminary plat - Mary Lake Addition for O'Dell Tinnesand, Yellowstone Trail. Motion passed 4/0. D . A Motion to Approve a Sign Permit Applicant: A LaPointe Sign Co. (on behalf of Nail Gallery) Location: Waterford Shopping Center Planning Director Nielsen explained there are several sign violations which need to be corrected by the management company for the center prior to this sign being erected. I CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 4 Councilmember O'Neill reported he and Mayor Dahlberg have received complaints relative to sign lighting at this site. Nielsen explained one issue is the lighting of the signs. In reviewjng the Development Agreement and the Conditional Use Permit for the Waterford signage plan, there are no provisions requiring the signs be turned off at night. Nielsen explained the lighting at the Holiday station is to be off at 11:00 p.m. with the exception of the inside most pump island. At midnight, the lights are to be shut down entirely. He further explained the police department has done some spot checking of this and found the station to be in compliance. Nielsen further explained there is security lighting in the rear of the building which is downcast. Councilmember O'Neill commented he received a complaint the night security flood lights at the Holiday station are shining across the highway and into neighborhood homes. Nielsen stated he will investigate this. O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded approving a sign permit for A LaPointe Sign Co., on behalf of Nail Gallery, at the Waterford Shopping Center, subject to the sign violations at the Center being corrected prior to installation of the new sign. Motion passed 4/0. 7 . CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO WAIVE PENALTY FEES . A letter was received from Mr. Paul Eidsness requesting the penalty charges which were incurred on utility charges paid after the due date be waived. In his letter, Mr. Eidsness explained the property was rented and the penalty charge was incurred because the renter did not pay his utility bill on time. Councilmembers Garfunkel and O'Neill were opposed to waiving the penalty fees. Councilmember O'Neill stated the property owner is in the business of renting the property and this is an expense of operating a rental property. He stated a landlord would generally be holding a security deposit from the tenant to cover the costs of such expenses. Mayor Dahlberg explained his understanding Mr. Eidsness had an agreement with the renter that this situation would be resolved and the renter then did not follow through. He did not feel this was a lack of management on the part of Mr. Eidsness. Given the fact Mr. Eidsness has not made a request of this nature to the City in the past, Mayor Dahlberg was in favor of waiving the penalty fees. . Councilmember Stover noted the dollar figure is not large, however, the issue is that of consistency in application. Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded denying the request to waive the penalty fees for Paul Eidsness. Motion passed 4/0. 8. CONSIDERA TION OF A REQUEST FOR SHOREWOOD TO JOIN THE EXCELSIOR AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Councilmember Stover stated she could see no benefit to the City as a whole to join the Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce. She noted the City already supports various Excelsior community events such as the annual Fourth of July fireworks. Councilmember O'Neill felt the health of Excelsior and Excelsior businesses does have an impact on the City of Shorewood. Mayor Dahlberg was unsure whether it is beneficial to utilize taxpayer funds to be a member of the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce. \ . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 5 Councilmember Stover questioned whether other area cities have joined the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce. Hurm will investigate this matter. Councilmember O'Neill suggested tabling this issue for two weeks to gather additional information prior to making a decision. Councilmember Stover noted the membership fees to be $145 and pointed out it will be necessary for a representative of Shorewood to attend the meetings of the chamber on a regular basis. Administrator Hurm will obtain additional information and report back to the Council. 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN AD HOC COMMITTEE ON LAND CONSERVATION Mayor Dahlberg explained the Council has been interested in the green space issue and in preserving open, natural areas. He stated the job of this committee will be to investigate all of the various financial tools by which the City and residents, working together, can preserve undeveloped, open, natural areas in a fashion which offers some type of financial return to the property owner. Councilmember O'Neill noted the Council has discussed several ways of acquiring green space. He pointed out the City would not necessarily own these areas of green space. They could be individually owned or donated to various charitable organizations. The committee will consist of three members. The Council has asked Dean Riesen, a Shorewood resident and expert on this particular subject, to chair the committee. O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-025, "A Resolution Establishing an Ad Hoc Committee on Land Conservation." Councilmember Stover pointed out grammatical changes need to be made to Items B and D of the section entitled "Land Conservation Tools." It was agreed, in Item B, to replace "set aside" with "set-aside" and, in Item D, change to read, "Assist a non-profit land conservation group "to" become established . . ." O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-025, "A Resolution Establishing an Ad Hoc Committee on Land Conservation," as amended to reflect in Item B, "set-aside," and Item D reworded to reflect "to become established." Motion passed 4/0. Councilmember Stover felt residents should be notified in any way possible of the opportunity to serve on this committee. 10. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS Staff Report on Development Monitoring Planning Director Nielsen reported on the Marsh Pointe development and a complaint which was received relative to the installation of stop signs. The developer has been directed to resolve this situation. ~ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 6 A complaint has also been received relative to the lighting of the model home as well as the entry monument sign on this development. The developer has dimmed the lighting and the interior lights of the model home have been turned off by 11:00 p.m. With respect to the yard lighting which illuminates the signage of the development, Nielsen reported it is brighter than is allowed and a notice has been sent to the developer instructing him to correct this situation. With respect to the Watten Ponds Development, a building permit was recently rejected due to the tree preservation plan not complying with the City's policy. Follow up is also being undertaken with the prosecuting attorney relative to the violations on Lot 7 where the excavating contractor had violated City policy. Administrator Hurm reported the Planning Commission has requested the joint session be moved to either the April 14th or April 21st. It was decided to schedule this meeting for April 14th at 7:00 p.m. at the Southshore Center. Hurm also provided a copy of a draft letter to be sent to the residents along Strawberry Lane noticing an open forum or informational meeting to be held relative to improvements which are anticipated for Strawberry Lane. This letter will be sent to residents within 600 feet on either side of Strawberry Lane. In addition, an article will also be included in the newsletter. There were no objections to the proposed letter. . 11. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Garfunkel thanked the seniors for the breakfast which was held on Saturday. Councilmember O'Neill stated he was very impressed with the volunteers who gave their time. Mayor Dahlberg noted his agreement. Councilmember Stover inquired relative to the work session which was held regarding the issue of wetlands. She asked whether the DNR and the Watershed District will be included. Councilmember Garfunkel explained this was simply an informational meeting relative to wetlands. He noted Mr. Svoboda has volunteered to make himself available as questions arise. Councilmember Stover suggested rather than having additional work session meetings, that the Council combine two meetings with a larger time commitment. She suggested meetings such as . the wetland information meeting follow a Council meeting so that it can be televised for the information of everyone. Councilmember Stover suggested it may be more expeditious to add some of the items to the regular Council agenda. She noted some of the work sessions have lasted approximately one hour and items which are less time consuming could be discussed as a part of the regular agenda. Councilmember O'Neill stated he will support the addition of various issues for discussion and consideration on the regular agenda. . " ' . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 23, 1998 - PAGE 7 12. ADJOURNMENT Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded adjourning the meeting at 8:43 p.m. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED. Cheryl WalIat, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR .~ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION JOINT WORK SESSION MEETING MONDA Y, MARCH 30, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION MEETING Chair Puzak called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. A. ROLL CALL Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill and Garfunkel;. Chair Puzak; Commissioners Colopoulos, Bensman, Dallman, Arnst, Themig and Cochran; Planning Commissioner Roger Champa; Administrator Jim Hurm Councilmember McCarty Present: Absent: B. REVIEW AGENDA Chair Puzak reviewed the agenda and it was accepted as presented. 2. MEET JOINTLY WITH BILL MORRIS. DECISION RESOURCES. INC.. TO DISCUSS PARK AND TRAIL SURVEY OUESTIONS Diane Traxler and Bill Morris, Decision Resources, Inc., were in attendance. The proposed survey questionnaire was distributed and reviewed by the City Council and Park Commission. Mr. Morris explained the revised questionnaire reflects the changes and deletions which were suggested after a review of the preliminary questionnaire. He suggested discussing the changes which were made as well as the items which were retained in the survey. Mr. Morris stated he would like to review and discuss approximately 25 percent of the revisions which were requested, but not ultimately incorporated into the survey. PAGE NO. 1 Mr. Morris explained Paragraph 1 has been worded in a way which will provide an effective way of ensuring the individual respondent will continue on the telephone. He noted over the years, various introductions have been tested to ensure participation on the part of the respondent and, therefore, sentence two of this paragraph was retained in this introduction. It had been suggested that Question No. 1 be included in the demographics section of th~~urvey. Mr. Morris explained this particular question is asked at the beginning of the survey as an ice breaker since it is a question everyone can answer and he felt it is needed for continuity. Commissioner Bensman inquired whether any sort of screening is performed to eliminate a particular respondent from the survey. Mr. Morris stated the telephone staff have been instructed to eliminate anyone under the age of 18. A random selection is utilized and this is based. on one of two procedures, either asking for birth dates of all adult residents in the household over the age of 18 or asking for the youngest male in the household over the age of 18 or the oldest female in the household over the age of 18. ~~t .'.1 CITY COUNCILIPARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 - PAGE 2 Councilmember O'Neill expressed concern relative to Question No. 1 and the possibility a respondent who has possibly lived in Shorewood for a shorter period of time would feel their input would not be utilized. Mr. Morris explained Question Nos. 2 and 3 are utilized to ascertain the attitude of residents relative to rating the quality of life and what is important to them. These questions also serve as a measure to determine which groups see the amenities of trails as being an integral part of the quality of life in the community. Mayor Dahlberg asked whether Question No.2 could be answered in absolute terms since it would be unknown to what the respondent is comparing the quality of life in Shorewood. He did not feel this to be an objective measure of the quality of life in Shorewood, but simply an attitude indicator. Mayor Dahlberg felt it would be accurate to describe this question as an attitude. Councilmember Garfunkel asked how a negative response relative to the quality of life in Shorewood would correlate to other responses which are given throughout the survey. Mr. Morris explained the results will be cross tabulated to determine the reason for a particular answer. Councilmember Stover inquired why a question is not included relative to what a respondent least . likes in Shorewood. Mr. Morris pointed out this question had been deleted from the preliminary questions which had been submitted for review by the Park Commission and City Council. Councilmember Stover felt this question would give a respondent the opportunity to let the City know what they do not like. Ms. Traxler felt this to be an excellent question to be incorporated into this particular survey. Chair Puzak felt there to be value to both questions, noting the question relative to what. a respondent likes least in the City would provide goals for the future. The consensus of the group was to incorporate the question, "What do you like least, if anything, about living in Shorewood?" Mayor Dahlberg suggested rewording Question No.3 to read, "What do you like most about living in Shorewood, if anything?" And it was decided this ch~ge should be made to keep the questions parallel. With respect to the specific parks, the telephoners will be allowed, if asked, to indicate Badger Park is located next to City Hall. Chair Puzak pointed out some of the parks are neighborhood parks and may not be known to all of the residents. Mr. Morris suggested including locations . along with the name of the park. PAGE NO.2 Commissioner Arnst recalled that in asking questions regarding trails, the LRT would not be involved. She asked how the City can be sure respondents are not responding to the LRT when being asked questions relative to the trail. Chair Puzak pointed out Freeman Park is the only park with a network of trails contained within the park. Commissioner Bensman suggested possibly adding concession stands to the survey. Chair Puzak was in favor of this, noting this is a part of the Park Commission's agenda. Therefore, it was suggested concession stands be added as Item 18a. Chair Puzak suggested referring to "concessions stands at Freeman Park" and "trails at Freeman Park." Councilmember Stover pointed out a number of children utilize Manor Park simply as a yard. as opposed to utilizing the equipment and fields. Ms. Traxler suggested adding an item "Other." Council member Garfunkel felt this situation would be true of a number of the parks. .-,. . . CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 - PAGE 3 Mr. Morris suggested adding Item 18b, "Grassy areas for leisure activities" and this was accepted by the group. Administrator Hurm inquired whether Item No. 15 should include a reference to softbaII and baseball fields. Commissioner Themig questioned whether the goaI was to determine whether the residents use these items or to ascertain their impression of the quality. Chair Puzak explained one of the purposes of this section of the survey was determine how much or how often the residents use items such as tennis courts. He noted, for example, a tennis court would involve high capital and high maintenance costs. Administrator Hurm recalled the group had discussed a rewording of this section to determine which facilities the respondent would use if they were more available in the parks. Commissioner Themig felt the group had been looking for more content to this particular question. Ms. Traxler suggested asking the respondents to rate the facilities they actually use by excellent, good, fair or poor. Commissioner Bensman felt the group had discussed this to be more of a value question, pointing out a respondent may feel a particular facility is valuable even though they may never use them at all. Commissioner Bensman suggested first asking whether the facilities are used or not and, secondly, whether the respondent feels the facilities are valuable. Ms. Traxler stated this could be done and the results cross tabbed. Chair Puzak noted the group would be looking for an indication of usage and value. It was decided value will be asked of each of the items listed. Mr. Morris suggested, "Whether you use them or not, please tell me how valuable you think it is for a community to offer these types of facilities. Would you say very valuable, somewhat vaIuable, not too vaIuable or not at all vaIuable," and then the telephoner would proceed through the list. With respect to Question No. 20 and concerns raised by Mayor Dahlberg, Mr. Morris suggested rewording this question to reflect, "In particular, do you or members of your household regularly use trails in other cities?" Commissioner Bensman felt Question No. 21 to actuaIly be two questions. Chair Puzak noted his agreement. Commissioner Arnst felt the question contradicts itself in that land is not preserved for baIl fields, but rather it is developed. Ms. Traxler suggested deleting the words "preserved" and "developed." Commissioner Bensman suggested the first question ask, "If the City of Shorewood should acquire presently undeveloped land for recreational purposes?" Chair Puzak suggested the fIrst question be, "Should the City of Shorewood acquire additional land space for recreation for parks?" The second question could be, "If the City of Shorewood had land, would you like to see it developed into organized baIl fields or left naturaI?" Mayor Dahlberg asked whether the Council and the Park Commission are actuaIly interested in acquiring more space for the parks. He stated he was under the impression the City is not interested in acquiring additionaI space. Chair Puzak did not feel anyone knows the answer to that particular question. Commissioner Colopoulos felt it would behoove the City to ask questions of a specific nature relative to acquiring trails, green space, or additional baIl fields given the expense involved in a trail project. Chair Puzak felt it important to ask whether the residents feel there is enough park land in the community. He did not feel it would be beneficial to address what to do with any additional land since the City has not acquired additional land. CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 . PAGE 4 Commissioner Colopoulos felt there should be a balance of similar scale projects, not by price, but by comparison based on the range of the scale being considered. Commissioner Bensman was in favor of asking whether the City should consider acquiring additional park land without making specific suggestions for use of any potential property. Commissioner Themig felt Question No. 21 should be asked prior to Question No. 19. The group was in agreement with this. With respect to Question No. 22, Councilmember Garfunkel expressed concern relative to asking questions about the quality of life in that it is not a definable term and could be influenced by a respondent's activities on the day the survey is taken. Mayor Dahlberg asked how a respondent could measure the affect a trail system would have on the quality of life if they do not know what the trail system actually is. He pointed out at this time, the trail system is very abstract. Mr. Morris suggested moving Question Nos. 34 and 35 directly after Question No. 21. Prior to any discussion of trails, the respondent would be asked what they see as the major benefit or the major positive of a trail system and what, if anything, would be seen as the major negative or major concern. The group was in agreement with this. Question No. 22 will be deleted. PAGE NO.3 . Commissioner Themig pointed out not everyone understands what a trail is and noted the phrase "shared use path" has been used in the past. He asked whether there should be a definition included which would clarify this to the respondent. Ms. Traxler felt the opening paragraph defines a trail as a connected citywide trail system in which residents could use the trails for recreation and for traveling. Commissioner Themig expressed concern respondents will relate trails to the LRT. Ms. Traxler suggested the telephoners be allowed to state as often as necessary, "We are not addressing the LRT traiL" Councilmember Stover explained the term "trail" has a negative impact because the trail which is available within the City is the LRT trail. She suggested the telephoners be allowed to say there is no similarity to the current LRT trail. With respect to Question No. 23, Mayor Dahlberg felt there should be a third option in which a respondent could state they are not in favor of either option. Mr. Morris suggested utilizing the paragraph indicating the differentiation of the LRT trail with a question asking, "Would you favor or oppose the development of a trail system in the City of Shorewood?" This would be followed . by, a question relative to if the City of Shorewood were to consider developing a trail system in the community, would the respondent have a preference between the two options, or do they not care. This would answer the question of whether a particular respondent would support or oppose the development of a trail system. Mayor Dahlberg felt this question would lock a respondent into assuming this is going to be something that they are going to like or not like and they do not know. Councilmember O'Neill pointed out this assumes a trail would be citywide when it may just be in a particular area. Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether an answer could be determined in a more expeditious fashion by conceptualizing this product research and dealing with features and then adjusting the methodology accordingly. Chair Puzak stated if this issue were approached with a finished product and visualization of a perceived trail system, there would be consideration objection by the residents. ~~ . . CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 - PAGE 5 Ms. Traxler stated product research would require a product and pointed out at this time there is not a product with which everyone agrees. She suggested adding a follow up question to whether or not the respondent would support a trail system in Shorewood asking them the reason for their feeling. Mr. Morris suggested the following wording: "Would you favor or oppose the development of a trail system in the City of Shorewood?" "Do you feel strongly that way?" "Could you tell me one or two reasons why you feel that way?" The group reached consensus on this matter. Chair Puzak noted Clay Atkins has requested the following be added to the survey: "If the City were to add a trail, where would you see that trail located?" followed by, "Why?" or "Why not?" Ms. Traxler stated the why or why not questions have been answered in several ways, however, the question of where has not been addressed. Councilmember Garfunkel felt this was again getting too specific. In addition, Mr. Atkins suggested asking, "How do you feel about a trail or trails to allow access to elementary schools?" Chair Puzak felt this question would also be getting into details and specifics. He pointed out the Park Commission had agreed not to address details at this point, but to take more of a value approach to determine whether this issue should be pursued. Commissioner Bensman requested the wording in Question No. 24 be changed to reflect "a trail" as opposed to "the traiL" It was also agreed anyone answering Question No. 25 would be asked Question Nos. 26 through 31 since participation on the trail system may not always be recreational. With respect to Question No. 32 which asks how close to the respondent's residence a trail would need to be for the respondent to use it, Mr. Morris suggested terms of time it would take to get to the trail could be utilized rather than distances. Mayor Dahlberg would be interested in reviewing this suggestion. Councilmember Stover felt distance may be a better measure when looking at the issue of children utilizing a trail to travel to school. She was in favor of using the measure of distance as opposed to time. The consensus of the group was to utilize the measure of distance. PAGE NO. 4 With respect to demographics, Ms. Traxler explained the household composition will be cross tabbed with the respondents' reactions. She stated the two most important factors to be age and household composition, however, educational level is often utilized. She explained education level is connected with health and well being, interconnected with exercise. Consensus of the group was to include a question relative to education. Mayor Dahlberg expressed his appreciate to Ms. Traxler and Mr. Morris for their work on the survey questionnaire. Ms. Traxler stated they will return with a revised questionnaire. Commissioner Champa raised the issue of permanent restroom facilities at Freeman Park and suggested this be included in the survey. Councilmember Garfunkel suggested, "What facilities do you feel are missing from the park?" Councilmember Stover supported this question in that it would bring to light any other facilities the respondent might feel are necessary. Commissioner Colopoulos again felt there should be a balance of similar scale projects, not by price, but by comparison based on the range of the scale being considered. He felt projects of similar magnitude should be compared to determine community interest. CITY COUNCILIPARK COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 . PAGE 6 Commissioner Cochran felt with the amount of money proposed, the residents should be aware there are options to maybe not spend the funds on a trail system. Councilmember O'Neill suggested, "Given the limited resources of the City, would you prefer to see a trail or other options?" Councilmember Stover was in favor of this as long as the question is left open for the :esident. Chair Puzak was opposed to this in that it opens the matter up to a number of other Issues. Chair Puzak questioned given similar costs, whether the City Council would like the Park Commission to develop a trail system or acquire additional green space. Mayor Dahlberg stated another option would be not to expend any funds at all. Ms. Traxler suggested a list of projects which some cities have undertaken for their communities and then asking the respondent to rank them. It was decided the options utilized will be green space, trails, a swimming pool, as well as an in-line skate park. 3. ADJOURNMENT Chair Puzak adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m. . RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, Cheryl Wallat Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: Tom Dahlberg, Mayor James C. Hurm, City Administrator . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MONDA Y, MARCH 30, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD UPON ADJOURNMENT OF JOINT WORK SESSION MTG MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 9:25 p.m. A. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill and Garfunkel; Planning Commissioner Roger Champa; Administrator Jim Hurm Absent: Councilmember McCarty . B. REVIEW AGENDA Mayor Dahlberg reviewed the agenda and it was accepted as presented. 2. MEET WITH BILL MORRIS. DECISION RESOURCES. INC.. TO DISCUSS GENERAL POLICY SURVEYS Diane Traxler and Bill Morris, Decision Resources, Inc., were in attendance. Mayor Dahlberg explained the purpose of the meeting is to discuss whether the effort relative to trails should be expanded to cover additional questions to which the Council would like responses from the residents of Shorewood. . Ms. Traxler and Mr. Morris felt several policies area could be defined and submitted to them, however, this would need to be completed prior to June 15th. Councilmember Stover inquired whether these issues would be included on the Park Commission survey and Mayor Dahlberg explained it would be a separate survey. Councilmember Stover suggested the survey be completed in the fall. Mayor Dahlberg was opposed to this and stated he would like the Council to agree on what they all sincerely believe is an objective attempt to clarify some of the questions which the Council is interested in. Mayor Dahlberg expressed his appreciation to Ms. Traxler and Mr. Morris for their willingness to work with the City on this matter and for the time and effort they have dedicated to this project. The Council reached consensus to meet with Ms. Traxler and Mr. Morris and to agree on the policy areas to be addressed. Administrator Hurm suggested this matter be added to the April 13, 1998 Work Session agenda. Council member Stover pointed out she is a member and secretary of the Board of the Friends of the Southshore Center which meets on the first Monday of each month. She noted this will prohibit her from attending any work sessions on the first Monday of the month. Councilmember O'Neill inquired how many major policy subjects should be included in a short survey. Ms. Traxler stated this would be at the discretion of the Council. ~.~~ CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 30, 1998 PAGE 2 It was agreed each councilmember will formulate a list of policy areas to be addressed in the survey and this will be discussed at the April 13, 1998 Work Session meeting. Council member Garfunkel also .suggested staff be consulted to ascertain any areas they would like to have surveyed relative to serVIces. Councilmember Stover stated she will attend the Work Session upon the conclusion of the Friends Board meeting. Administrator Hurm noted the agenda will include a discussion of neighborhood associations as well as policy subject areas for the proposed survey. Councilmember Stover requested the issues of Land Use and Adult Use Ordinance which is scheduled for the first Monday in May be rescheduled to enable her attendance. She suggested moving the meeting to Tuesday. Mayor Dahlberg and Councilmember O'Neill objected because they felt these issues need to be addressed as soon as possible. 3. ADJOURNMENT O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded adjourning the meeting at 9:37 p.m. passed 4/0. Motion RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . Cheryl Wallat Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: Tom Dahlberg, Mayor James C. Hurm, City Administrator . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Tom Dahlberg COUNCIL Kristi Stover Jennifer McCarty Jerry O'Neill John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~~ April 10, 1998 . . FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion to Establish a Public Information Meeting for Stormwater Management Plan On March 9, 1998 the City Council approved a motion for WSB and Associates to commence with preparation of the stormwater management plan for the City of Shorewood. Attachment 1 is a tentative schedule for preparation of the plan. A public information meeting is to be held early in the process to seek public input and to document the various drainage problems within the City. Afterwards, a report/memorandum will be generated which documents these problems. . Attachment 1 suggest that this meeting would be conducted in April. However, staff is recommending that this meeting would be held on May 6, 1998. Holding the meeting in May will provide enough time for the meeting notice to be published in the City newsletter which will be sent out to the residents at the end of April. Therefore, staff is recommending that a motion be approved to conduct a public information meeting to be held on May 6, 1998 to seek input and document drainage problems for preparation of the stormwater management plan. A Residenrial Communir'l on LaKe i'illinnercnKa's Sourh Shere 3b ~ WSB & Associates, Inc. March 12, 1998 Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E. Beet A. Weiss, P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. DonaldW. Seerna, P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 Re: Proposed Schedule Associated with the Completion of the Shorewood Storm Water ManagementPlan WSB Project No. 1074.08 Dear Larry: As a follow-up to our meeting on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, outlined below please find a draft schedule for the completion of your water resource management plan. Upon receipt of this schedule please feel free to contact me .. with your thoughts and feed back concerning the schedule and specifications. Date March / April 1998 April_,1998 May 1998 May / June 1998 July / August 1998 September/October 1998 September - December 1998 Activitv Initiate contact with various agencies requesting water resource information Hold meeting to obtain public input into the planning process and develop background information on specific issues or perceived water resource problems within the City. Prepare data collection memorandum outlining information obtained. Begin interpretation of water resources data, prepare draft sections of non- technical portions of plan, develop goals and policies. Prepare preliminary draft of plan, work on technical portions of the plan. . Submit plan to watershed management organizations for review and approval. Respond to WMO comments relative to the plan. As can be observed above, this schedule has been developed to be somewhat flexible, however, it will be important for the final report to be made available to the watershed district in the early Fall of 1998 for review in order to make the December approval deadline. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. ~~ Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Vice President Iv /!Trastrzlcrur;' lttaCJl?nen .... Griffin Companies 510 Marquette Avenue · Suite 300 · Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 · (612) 338-2828 Ii:XCLUSIVE REI'RIi:SENTATION AGREI~MENT (LISTING AGREEMENT - LEASE) TillS t\(jREEMENT (" Agreemenl") is made this day of . 199R. by al1<1 belween ORII'I'IN RE^" ESTA TE COM!' ANY, a Minnesota corporation doing business as ORI "FIN COM!' ANIES (hereinaner referred 10 as "Broker"). and CITY OF SIIOREWOOD. a cily government. with a business address of 5755 COUlltry Club Road, ShOreW(K>d. MN 55331 (hereinafter referred to as "City"). I. Agency. In consideralion of its efforts and expenditures, and its agreemenlto list in its offices the real properly and improvements hereillaner described and to provide Ihe services referred to herein. Cily hereby appoinls Broker asCily'sexclusive real est ale agent during the term of this Agreement and granls Broker the exclusive right 10 sublease lite realprop:rly and improvements, if any. described as follows (the "Property") or any portion Ihereof; . ADDRESS: CITY, STATE. ZIP: BUILDING SI7.E(Sq.FI.): PROPERTY TYI'E: LEGAL: DESCRIPTION: LEASE TERMS: OTIIER TERMS: 19905 Highway 7 Shorewood. MN 55331 4.500 square Icel retail COUNTY: Hennepin 10 conform with slreet address Full Renl sublel space shall not be used for on-sale or ofl~sale liquor or any other purpose prohibited by federal. state. or loeal law. or upon any other terms aecepled in \Vriling by City. Broker shall be entitlcd 10 a Leasc Commission Iilf any suhlease entered inlo by City in aeeordance with thc provisions of this Agreement. whether such sublease is negotiated direetly by City or another broker or whether sueh sublease is althe price alld upon the terms conlained herein. or al a different priee or opon other terms as may be aeeepted in wriling by City. 2. Commissions. "NOTICE: TIlE COMMISSION RATE FOR TIlE SALE. LF..ASE. RENTAL OR MANAGEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY SHALL BE DETERMINED BETWEEN EACH INDIVIDUAL BROKER AND ITS CLIENT." See attached Commission Schedule, the terms of which are incorporated herein by referenee. 3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on . 1998 and shall expire and tenninate on . 1998, subject 10 the Protective Period provided in Seclion 4 of Ihis Agreement. . 4. Prolective Period. Cily further agrees thaI in the event any sublease of the Property resulting from any contract or agreemenl enlered into by City within six (6) months after Ihe ex!,iration or termination of this Agreement ("Proteclive Period") is consummaled with any person or entity for which a Lease Commission would otherwise be payable by City hereunder. Cily will pay the sublease eommission to Broker. City shall furnish Broker with all relevanl informalion received by City during Ihe I'rotective !'eriod regarding any lease offers or inquiries from such persons or entities promptly after receiving same. The Broker's Prolective !'eriod shall only be applicable to persons or entities wilh whom Broker has negotiated during the term of this Agreemenl. Broker shall identify such persolls or entities by providing Cily wilh a wrillen "proteclive lisl" wilhin 72 hours of the expiration or termination of this Agreemenl. time being of the essence. Broker shall be conclusively deemed to have "negotiated" with a party. if Broker (or any outside broker actillg at the direetion of Broker) has shown the Property 10 such parly or prepared an oflcrll,ctter of Inlent on behalf of City to lease the I'roperey to such party or submitted written infonnalilm 10 such party concerning the Property specilically al the requesl of sueh party. This prolective period shall not apply to the persons or entilies listed on Exhibil A to Ihis Agreement. 5. Cily's Representation and Agreements. a. City represenls that Cily has full legal righl to sublease the Properly. b. Cily represents Ihal as ofthe date of this Agrccment. no notices. excL1l! as berein notL-d. pertaining to the Property have beell received by Cily fnlln any municipality or other gOVL'rnmenl agency. City agrees 10 promptly furnish Hroker with copies of any such nolices received doring the lerm of this Agreement. c. City agrees to permil Broker to erecl a "For Lease" sign on the Property and 10 remove all other "For Lease" signs from Ihe Property during the lerm of this Agreement. Cily further agrees to permil Hrnker to erecl a "Lea..ed" sign olllhe Property for a period of thirty (30) days 1"lIowing a I.L'8SC of the I'roperty. d. City agrees to refer 10 Broker all inquiries regarding the Property received from prospeclive lenanlS. e. City agrees Ihal any member of Broker's sales force may immedialcly offer the Property for lease under the lo:mlS hereor. City agrees 10 cooperate with and assist Hroker in making the I'roperty available for inspeetion by prospective h:nants and their agents. City agrees tn permil Broker iO sharc part of this Lease Commission wilh other "'81 eSlatc brnker~. including brokers only represenling tenants of the Properly. (l. Indel1lnitY. City agrees to indemnify Broker from and against any and allliahility. Inss. coSI. damage and e'pcllsc. including reasnnnblc consultant and attorney's fees. rcsuHingfrom or lIue to daimsmadc hy' any party arising Hul of the rcit:as~ or threatened release of hazardous waste. rolllll~nt$ or contaminants which ,,,'cre.. or aT\.': claimed or alh:g.C'd to" han: heen. fJer"o-.:itt.'~L qpred. di~ro<:cd or. r1ac..:d Ht ol!len',-j'::t: I()Cllt1..~d "f ,dlo.....1..:.d in. t\<.: !nC;llcd ~;H thcPropcrlybyC~i'- nr ~r~; *3C. ...~ employees or contractors. As used herein, the term "hazardous substances." "hazardous waSle,... "pollutants" and "containment" mean any substanecs. waste. pollutant or contamination now or hereafter included within such terms under any federal.. state or local statute. ordinanec. code or rcgulation now existing or thereaner enacted or amended. City agrees to indemnify and hold Brokcr harmless from any liability or damages arising Irom any incorrect information supplied by Cily or any information which City fails to supply. NOlhing contained herein shall constitute a waiver of any immunity or limitation on liability to which City is enlitled under t\linnesota Statutes. Chapter 466 or otherwise. 7. Security Agrcemenl. As security for Broker's Lease Commission. Cily hcreby grants (0 Broker a security interest in the sublease payments from any sublease of the Property. X. Dual Agency Disclosure. If a tenanl represented by Broker bccomes intcresled in the I'roperty, a dual agency will be erealed. This mcans that Broker will represent both City and Ihe lenant and owes the same duties to the tenant that Broker owcs to the City. This connict of interest will prohihit Broker from advocating exclusively on City's behalf. Dual agcney will limit the level of representation which Broker can provide. I f a dual agency should arise. Cily will need to agree that eonlidential information aboul price. terms and motivalion will still be kept eonlidentialunless City instruels Broker <in writing 10 disclose specilic informalion about City. All other information will be shared. Broker cannot act as a dual agent unless both City and the tenanl agree to il. By agreeing to a possible dual agency. City will be giving uplhe right to exclusive representation in an in-house trans.1ction. Ilowever. ifCity should decide nol to agrec 10 a possible dual agency, the City wants Broker to represenl Cily. Cily may give up the opportunity to lease the Property to tenanls representcd hy Broker. CITY'S INSTRUCTIONS TO BROKER City will agrec to a dual agency representation and will eonsidcr offcrs made by tenants represented by Broker. . Having read and underst()(>d this inlilflnaliun about dual agcney. City nuw instructs Ilroker as follows: City will not agree 10 a dual agency representation and will nol consider offers made by lenants represented by Broker. City: (signature) Ilroker: (signalure) 3. Limitation on Ilroker's Authorization. Broker is nul authorized to render any I"" or legal advice with rcspectto any Lcase of thc Property and City agrees to look 10 accountants. attorneys and/or other prufL"Ssilmals of its choosing for specilie advice wilh respeel to any such transactions. 4. Miscellaneous. a. This Agreement is intended as Ihe eomplele and Iinal agreement of the parties and, as such. merges wilh and superscdes any and all prior eommunieations between Ihe parlies, written or oral. This Agreernenl shall not be ehanged. altercd or modi lied. and no provision may be waived except by an instrument in writing signed by the party againsl whom such change. modilication or waiver is sough!. b. This Agrecmenl shall bind cily. Brokcr and their respective successors and/or assigns. e. This Agreement shall be governcd by and construed in aceordanee with the 1m,s of the State of MinnL"Sota. . d. This Agreement is expressly su~jeet to Ihe condilion precedent thatlhe owner of the Property consent in writing to Ihi: terms of this Agreement. ReceiDI is acknowledged of a CODY of this Aereement BROKER: CITY: GRIFFIN REAL ESTATE COMPANY. a Minnesota corpor:otion. dba GRIFFIN COMPANIES CITY OF SIIOREWOOD By: By: lis: Robert S. Dunbar I'rcsidenl lis: Dale: By: By: . Agent lis: Date: Date: -- COMMISSION SCHEDULE LEASE COMMISSION SCHEDULE: Subject to the terms. conditions and provisions of this Agreement. City agrees to pay Broker lease eommissions ('Lease Commissions") in an amount determined as follows: $3.00 pcr square foot if any sublease involving the Property ("sublease") is exeeuted by City during the term of this Agreement or the "Proteetive Period" (as de lined and limited herein). Unless otherwise set forth in this Agreemcl1l. aU Lease Commissions shall be payable (me-half (112) :It cxeeution of the applicable sublcase and OIIe-half (112) attimc of oecul"lIlcy. In the cvent a co-broker is involved in any sublease transaction entitling Broh-r to a Lease Commission under this Agrecment the amount orthe Lease Commission shall be $4.50 per S<luarc loot. and Broker shall be responsible for payment of any :unoonls due to the co-brokcr. which payment shall be due and payable only upon rcecipt of the Lease Commission by Broker. . . r- ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE AGREEMENT For Valuable Consideration, the City of Shorewood, Assignor, hereby grants, assigns, transfers, and conveys to , Assignee, the Assignor's interest in that certain Lease Agreement (the "Lease"), as amended, by and between Assignor and J.M.S. Equities, for the occupancy of property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, located at 19905 Highway 7, Shorewood, Minnesota, subject to all the terms and conditions of Assignor under the Lease, as amended. DATED: , 1998 ASSIGNOR CITY OF SHOREWOOD By Its . By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1998, before me a Notary Public within and for said . County, personally appeared and of the City of Shorewood, the Assignor, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are the and of said Assignor, that this instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Assignor, and they acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Assignor. Notary Public CARLSK140954 SH230-11 . AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT This Amendment to the Lease Agreement (the "Lease") between the City of Shorewood ("Lessee") and J.M.S. Equities, Inc. ("Lessor") is made and entered into this day of , 1998. For and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree to amend the Lease to provide as follows: 1. Lessee may assign the Lease without Lessor's consent. 2. Upon such assignment and with notice to Lessor, Lessee will be released from its obligations under the lease. . Except as modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Lease remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Lease Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. J.M.S. EQUITIES, INC. By Its . By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ,On this day of , 1998, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and of 1M.S. Equities, Inc., the Lessor, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are the and of said Lessor, that this instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Lessor; and they acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Lessor. CARLSK140943 SH230-11 . Notary Public CITY OF SHOREWOOD By Its By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1998, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and of the City of Shorewood, the Lessee, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are the and of said Lessee, that this instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Lessee; and they acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Lessee. Notary Public CARLSK140948 SH230-11 .. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Tom Dahlberg COUNCIL Kristi Stover Jennifer McCarty Jerry O'Neill John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator . FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works . DATE: . April 10, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposal for Engineering Services for the Trunk Highway 7 Access Closures. On December 15th, 1997, the Shorewood _City Council passed a resolution which approved several access modifications with Trunk: Highway 7 (refer to attachment 1). Attachment 2 is notification that the City of Shorewood was successful in obtaining $350,000 to fund these access changes and closures. This. document also indicates all of the proposals were funded, and.the amount of funding received through the Cooperative Agreements Program.. . The following is a table which demonstrates the concept project costs, and the amount or participation approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation Cooperative Agreement Program. Prnjed Desuiptiull Concept Ikujeet €ustcS Close Lake Linden Drive (west access) at m 7 Close Seamans Drive at m 7 Close Pleasant Av~ue at m 7 Close Wood Drive at m 7 Shorewood Shopping Center Access Realignment and Add EVP to the Signal System Grand T otaI Project Cost $ 45,200 $ 59,000 $ 42,000 $ 30,000 $150,200 (see narrative) $371,400 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Amount funded by Mn/DOT is $350,000 + $28,000 engineering costs for a totaIof $378,000. 3c{ The Shorewood Shopping Center Access modifications were estimated using the concept of adding EVP to the existing signal system. After further investigation, it has been determined that the existing signal is older than 12 to 15 years, and will not readily accept EVP. During discussions with Mn/DOT, representatives have stated that MnlDOT would be willing to fund the replacement of the signal through their infrastructure maintenance program. The City would be responsible for 25% of the signal costs and 92% of the design costs. Eight percent of the design cost would be picked up as an extension of the Cooperative Agreement Program. The remaining costs of the design and construction can be funded using Municipal State Aid funds. Some costs are not eligible for funding by the Cooperative Agreements Program. These typically involve any right of way acquisition. Since a majority of the roadways involved have been designated as a state aid route, these costs would be submitted to MSA for funding. Attachm.ent 3 is an excerpt of the proposal submitted by WSB and Associates, Inc. which lists the . . design tasks and associated cost items. The cost breakdown is shown on page 4 of attachment 3 and is listed at $78,690. It should be noted that there are some variables with this in that tasks 2,3, and 6 are based upon a percentage of construction cost. This type of fee structure is necessary due to the size and complexity of this type of project. The consultant's percentage of 6 and 7 percent for these tasks are very reasonable and are appropriate for these tasks. The numbers provided to Mn/DOT were purposefully increased to insure dollars received would exceed dollars spent.by the City. Although it is not expected,.. any unforeseen increases in project costs, design, or construction observation which exceeded the $378,000 would have to be funded by MSA funds, or as a last resort, the local roadway fund. This is mentioned here only as a precaution. After review of the construction estimates, it is reasonable to assume that costs shown are very reasonable. Therefore, staffis recommending.approval of the attached resolution which accepts the proposal for . Professional Engineering Services by WSB and Associates, Inc for the Trunk Highway 7 Access Closures. CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 97-109 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION TO MnlDOT REGARDING ACCESS CLOSURES Ai'll) IMPROVEMENTS TO VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS WITH STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested participation by the City of Shorewood in closing certain intersections on State Trunk Highway 7, and in making improvements to certain other intersections on State Trunk Highway 7; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has conducted numerous neighborhood meetings to discuss various alternatives for improving the safety at intersections on State Trunk: Highway 7. . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNcn. that Shorewood City Staff pursue the following improvements to State Trunk: Highway 7 with the Minnesota Department of Transportation: 1. The intersection at State Trunk Highway 41 shall be realigned to create dedicated left turn lanes and separate through lanes on both the north and south legs of the intersection; and to create a free right tum for traffic westbound onto Highway 7 from the Shorewood Shopping Center access. 2. The intersection at Lake Linden Drive and Trunk Highway 7 shall be closed. 3 . The intersection at Wood Drive shall be closed and a cul-de-sac shall be constructed at the south end of Wood Drive. 4. The access to Highway 7 at Pleasant Avenue shall ~ closed. . 5. The access to Highway 7 at Se~man~ Drive shall be closed. 6. The intersection at Eureka Road shall be improved to include a right-tnm lane for traffic southbound on Eureka Road to westbound Highway 7. ADOPTEJ) by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 15th day of December, 1997. ~ l' ~ Z ~ . ATTEST: .:i J 1i. ~ ~ .. t :a U^""i),{ C. ~ Jamei C. Hurm, City Administrator/Cletk I Attachment "".J....;-.,/...N~ ,;",:,/\;~;-/./- !,"'\"NEISO~ ~ ,. .... " ~ \,. 'i>l 01' Tl\l' Minnesota Department of Transportation . Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 82 Roseville, MN 55113 February 26, 1998 r,~ :.~ ~GoA- ....J ~ ....J,~..I.... :: '-! _582::.1351___~__.. ._._.~."_V."~.~_""" '-"-. __~ ~_':F" """'~_'_~'~,'__". _. ..__~ ,_, TO: Fiscal Year 1999 Municipal Agreement Program Project Candidates Subject: Mn/DOT Fiscal Year 1999 (FY '99) Municipal Agreement (AM) Program (7/1/98 - 6/30/99) Project Selection Results Attached please fmd the results of the selection process for projects requesting TH funding in the FY '99 Municipal Agreement (AM) Program. The list is broken into 2 categories as follows: - FY 1999 Successful Projects - Unsuccessful Projects The Project Selection Committee that evaluated and made funding recommendations for this year's AM Program consisted of the following: - 5 City Engineers - 1 Assistant County Engineer - 8 Mn/DOT Representatives from various Metro Division Functional Groups. The committee placed each of the projects within a project category based on Mn/DOT's Transportation System Plan. The group also determined whether the Trunk Highway benefit vs. cost ratio was low, medium or high. Using this information, the projects were ranked. After this ranking, the Metro Division determined how many projects were selected based onthe available funding. . This year it was determined that all of the projects that fell within the Preservation and Management categories would be included in the Metro Division Municipal Agreement Program. The Funding for these projects will be available July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999. Please refer to the attached list to determine which projects were selected to be programmed. For these projects, comments have been provided that outline specific requirements, Mn/DOT's contribution limit, or other issues that must be addressed prior to receiving the funding. . All Municipal Agreement Program Projects must have the plans prepared in METRIC units. We will be holding a design seminar on April 14, 1998 for the selected projects. Additional seminar information will be mailed out shortly. We strongly encourage your designers or project managers to attend and share information with us about how the entire process can better serve the local agencies. Please contact Kevin Hoglund, Cooperative Agreement Engineer (582-1370) if you have any questions or need additional information. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, ~~ Metro Division State Aid Engineer Enclosures: ;.:':.n equal oDDortunirv emo!over Attachmen12 Municipal Agreement Program Fiscal Year 1999 Successful Projects Prj. Local Agency and Project Location Category and Rank Contact Person and Description Comments Funding City of North Branch TH 95 @ MSAS 64 Management! Project = $400,000 Julie Dresel, 674-8113 Channelization Preservation Local Agency = $260,000 Tom Sohrweide, SEH New Signal System - 50% of signal AM Program = $140,000 490-2072 Access Management - Cost of overlay without widening & striping. - City to provide access control from FORD dealer to MnIDOT. 2 City of Ham Lake TH 65, East Frontage Road Management! Project = $192,000 Julian Fenendael, RFC at 133rd Ave. (new CSAH) Preservation Local Agency = $107,000 . 429-5576 TH 65 Drainage - 50% of Frontage Road AM Program = $85,000 - Drainage based on contributing flow. - City must provide access control to MnlDOT from TJB Homes. 3 City of Burnsville 1-35 at Buck Hill Management! Project = $350,000 Teresa Burgess NURP Pond Preservation Local Agency = $293,000 895-4488 - Drainage based on AM Program = $57,000 contributing flow. 4 City of Eden Prairie II EVP Installations Management! Project = $245,000 Rodney Rue, 949-8314 Preservation! Local Agency = $90,000 Allan Klugman, Westwood Safety AM Program = $155,000 906- 7418 - Some new cabinet and . controllers needed. 5 City of Jordan TH282@TH21 Management! Project = $25,000 Tim Loose EVP Installation Preservation! Local Agency = $0 Bolten Menk Safety AM Program = $25,000 (507) 625-4171 - New cab. & cont. 6 City of White Bear Lake Entire City Management! Project = $144,000 Mark Burch 12 TH EVP Installations Preservation! Local Agency = $60,000 429-8531 Safety AM Program = $84,000 Note: 8% will be added to each of the above listed AM funding totals for construction engineering and inspection. Date 2-26-98 o:\COOP AGR\FY99\FY99PRJ.LST Municipal Agreement Program Fiscal Year 1999 Successful Projects ( continued) Prj. Local Agency and Project Location Category and Rank Contact Person and Description Comments Funding 7 City of Savage TH 13 Management! Project = $32,000 Chuck Rickart, WSB 6 EVP Installations Safety Local Agency = $16,000 541-4800 AM Program = $16,000 8 City of Golden Valley TH 169 @ Plymouth Ave. Management! Project = $170,000 Fred Salsbury Frontage Road Safety/Capacity Local Agency = $20,000 593-8035 Retaining Wall - MSAS route to be AM Program = $150,000 Signal Mod. released to City. - City pays for 50% . of signal revision. . 9 City of Ham Lake TH 65 at Bunker Lk. Blvd. Management! Project = $95,000 Julian Fenendael, RFC West Frontage Road Safety Local Agency = $20,000 429-5576 Realignment AM Program = $75,000 10 City of Plymouth 1-494 @ CSAH 9 Management! Project = $360,000 Dan Faulkner Ped Bridge Safety Local Agency = $65,000 509-5520 FY '99 Federal Aid Project - MnlDOT to pay Federal = $270,000 25% of local match AM Program = $25,000 11 City of Shorewood TH 7 near TH 41 Management! Project = $400,000 Larry Brown Access Closures Safety Local Agency = $50,000 474-3236 - Close Pleasant Ave. Am Program = $350,000 - Close Seamans Drive - Close Wood Drive - Close Lake Linden Drive . and realign LLD and TH 41 - Close driveway east ofTH 41 - City must pay for Eureka TL 12 Hennepin County TH 55 at Management! Project = $170,000 (in Medina) CSAH liS/Co. Rd. 116 Capacity Local Agency = $115,000 Jim Grube Channelization - MnlDOT to pay for AM Program = $55,000 930-2506 Signal Mod. 50% of signal and RR x-ing mod. Note: 8% will be added to each of the above listed AM funding totals for construction engineering and inspection. .., Municipal Agreement Program Fiscal Year 1999 Successful Projects ( continued) Prj. Local Agency and Rank Contact Person Project Location and Description 13 14 . 15 16 . 18 City of Maple Plain Glenn Cook Bonestroo 636-4600 City of Greenfield James R. Hill 890-6044 Scott County (in Shakopee) Brad Larson 496-8346 Scott County (in New Prague) Dan Jobe 496-8346 Dakota County (in Rosemount) Dave Everds Lezlie Vermillion 891-7104 City ofChaska B ill Monk 448-2851 TH 12 at Co. Rd. 83/Halgren Rd. Channelization Access removal TH 55 between CSAH 50 and CSAH 92 Access Consolidation Frontage Road TH 169 at Old CR 18 TH 169 at CR 79 Fencing of Bridges TH 13/TH 19 at CR 37 Channelization TH 3 @ new Co. Rd. 46 TH 3 Realignment TH212@TH41 Channelization Signal System Revision Category and Comments Management - City to pay for L TL and RTL at Halgren based on permit require. (estimated at $125,000) - Mn/DOT to pay for other TH 12 roadwork and access closures. Management! Safety - Mn/DOT, Rockford and Greenfield must agree on final layout. Management! Safety - Fencing must be designed by Mn/DOT Bridge Office Management! Capacity Management - Mn/DOT to pay for local match (20%) of TH 3 construction. Management! Improvement - Mn/DOT to pay for TH 212 RTL and required signal mod. only. No funding for TH 41. Note: 8% will be added to each of the above listed AM funding totals for construction engineering and inspection. ... .) Funding Project = $275,000 Local Agency = $125,000 Am Program = $150,000 Project = $650,000 Local Agency = $150,000 AM Program = $500,000 Project = $45,000 Local Agency = $0 AM Program = $45,000 Project = $75,000 Local Agency = $25,000 AM Program = $50,000 Project = $6,000,000 Local Agency = $1,000,000 Federal = $4,800,000 AM Program = $200,000 Project = $390,000 Local Agency = $290,000 AM Program = $100,000 Prj. Local Agency and Rank Contact Person 19 City of White Bear Lake Mark Burch 429-8531 20 City ofInver Grove Hgts. Gary Johnson 450-2571 Greg Brown, BRW 373-6479 21 Hennepin County (in Medina) Jim Grube 930-2506 Municipal Agreement Program Fiscal Year 1999 Successful Projects ( continued) Project Location and Description TH 244 @ Linden Ave. New Signal System Access Consolidation TH 52 @ 1l7th East & West Frontage Road Access consolidation TH 55 North Frontage Road at Arrowhead Drive Access Consolidation Future Access Control Category and Comments Funding Management! Expansion - City pays for RTL on TH 244. - City must close Willow Ave. to receive funding. Project = $195,000 Local Agency = $115,000 AM Program = $80,000 Management! Expansion - MnlDOT to pay 100% for east frontage road & a portion of the west frontage road from the propane dealer to the single resident on TH 52. (Sta. 1 + 130 to 1 +628) Project = $1,300,000 Local Agency = $800,000 AM Program = $500,000 . Management! Expansion - City of Medina must build future frontage road & provide access control. Project = $310,000 Local Agency = $0 AM Program = $310,000 . FY 1999 Funding Summary Federal Aid = $5,070,000 Local Agency Contribution = $3,601,000 AM Program = $3.152.000 Fund~g Total = $11,823,000 4 Note: 8% will be added to each of the above listed AM funding totals for construction engineering and inspection. Municipal Agreement Program Unsuccessful Projects Prj. Local Agency and Project Location Category and Rank Contact Person and Description Comments Funding 22 City of Minnetonka TH 7 at Vine Hill Road Improvement Project = $285,000 Lee Gustafson Channelization on Local Agency = $285,000 939-8200 Vine Hill Road AM Program = $0 23 Dakota County TH 52 @CSAH 14 Improvement Project = $320,000 (in Inver Grove Heights 2 new Ramp Signal Sys. Local Agency = $320,000 and S. St. Paul) AM Program = $0 Dave Everds Lezlie Vermillion 891- 71 04 24 City of Minneapolis 1-94 exit ramp to Improvement Project = $270,000 . Don Elwood 673-3622 Hennepin/Lyndale Local Agency = $270,000 James Stoutland 673-3365 Add LanelRetaining Wall AM Program = $0 25 City of Mounds View TH 10 @ Edgewood Site Development Project = $325,000 Pam Maki, SEH Realignment of Edgewood Local Agency = $325,000 . 490-2122 TL and median work AM Program = $0 New Signal System . 5 Exhibit A Scope of Services Project No.1: TH 7 Access Closures / Intersection Improvements Task 1 - Design Surveys A Design Survey will be conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc which will provide topographic information and elevations for the areas around and adjacent to the access closures and TH 41/shopping center entrance. It is assumed that up to three (3) days of survey time will be required to provide this information. A detailed base map in metric format will be provided as part of this task. Task 2 - Intersection / Street Design A. Preliminary Design: Preliminary access closure and intersection design will be completed for the proposed improvements including anticipating striping and lane . configurations. This will be based on previous concepts. Should any additional right-of-way be required, it will be identified at this time. B. Final Design: This task will include developing final construction plans for the required street closures and intersection improvements. This will include any detail sheets required, layout sheets, including profiles and applicable cross sections, as well as pavement section design. (It is assumed that WSB will rely on existing soils information. If soils information is required, it will be performed as an extra service). C. Special Provisions: A set of special provisions addressing all required improvements will be completed in a format consistent with the City of Shorewood requirements. The bid proposal will be prepared as a part of this phase, including incorporating the city-designed sheets and specifications. D. Cost Estimate: A cost estimate will be developed based on MnJDOT' s Cooperative Agreement Policy addressing all items included in the intersection I street improvements. . E. Meetings: It is assumed that up to four meetings will be held as part of this task. These meetings will be held in conjunction with the meetings as outlined in the traffic signal design task (Task 3). City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan I WSB Proposal 028.98 Attachment 3 Task 3 - Traffic Signal Designs A. Preliminary Signal Design: A preliminary traffic signal design will be developed by WSB & Associates, Inc at TH 7 and TH 41 I shopping center entrance to accommodate the proposed intersection configuration. The preliminary plan will include the location of the source of power, all poles and control equipment. This plan will be reviewed with the City of Shore wood and MnlDOT. B. Final Signal Design: Following comments from the City and MnIDOT on the preliminary design, a final design will be completed. Design of traffic signal will be in conformance with all applicable state and local electrical codes, the Federal and State Manuals on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT) State Aid Standards. The final design will include; all applicable detail sheets, intersection layout and wiring diagram. The final plans will also include provisions for Emergency Vehic1e Pre-emption (EVP) system and any required mast arm signing and interconnection. . c. Special Provisions: A set of special provisions will be developed for the traffic signal system and mast arm signing. These special provisions will be based on MnlDOT standards specifications. These special provisions will be incorporated into the bid proposal prepared for the project. D. Cost Estimate: An estimate of cost for the signal system components will be developed as a part of the total project estimate of cost. E. Meetings For The Traffic Signal System: It is anticipated that four (4) meetings will be held as part of the preliminary and final design. One meeting will be held with the local power company to determine the location and routing of the source of power for the intersection. Two meetings will be held with the City, one following the preliminary design to review the intersection layout and addressing any concerns with the traffic signal system. The second meeting will be held following the final plans. One meeting will be held with MnlDOT to review the plans and assure all items that may be of concern to them have been addressed. . Task 4 - Preconstruction Services A. Final Plans and Specifications: WSB will develop and distribute the plans and specifications to prospective bidders. WSB will charge for the bid proposals as payment for printing changes. The City and appropriate agencies will not be charged. ' B. State Approvals: WSB will submit this project to MnJDOT for review and approval. Any comments made by MnlDOT will be addressed and their approvals will be obtained. City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan I WSB Proposal 028.98 Page 2 C. Shop Drawing Review: All shop drawings from the manufacturers and contractor will be submitted through the City and reviewed by WSB to determine their adequacy prior to ordering of equipment. D. Contract Award: WSB will review the bids received by the City and make a recommendation to the City as to their adequacy and make a recommendation of an award of the contract. Task 5 - MnlDOT Coordination As discussed in the traffic signal design and intersection / street design tasks coordination with Mn/DOT will occur throughout the design process. In addition to this, we will assist the City on obtaining and executing the cooperative agreements for the intersection improvements. Task 6 - Construction Services A. Construction Staking: WSB personnel will be available for construction staking . services. Our survey crew would locate all components of the traffic signal system in addition to the street improvements necessary. This work would be completed on an hourly basis. B. Construction Inspection Services: WSB would assist the City in whatever level of construction services they would require. This would include either day-to-day inspection or an as-needed service during critical portions of the contract. . City of Shorewood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 1 WSB Proposal 028.98 Page 3 ExhibitB Compensation / Schedule Project No.1: TH 7 Access Closures / Intersection Improvements Estimated Cost Based on the scope of services, as outlined in Exhibit A the cost to provide such services will be as follows: . Task 1 Design Survey (Hourly - 30 Hours at $93.00/hour) ....................... $ 2,700. Task 2 Roadway Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ...................... $24,000. Task 3 Traffic Signal Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ................... $8,400. Task 4 Preconstruction Services (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ......................... $2,000. Task 5 Mn/DOT Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,500. Task 6 Construction Services (7% of Actual Construction Costs) ................... $35,000. Total Cost .................................................. $73,690. A 1998 Fee Schedule is attached. Schedule WSB will deliver a final set of plans and specifications to the City of Shorewood within the frame required by the City. This time schedule is assuming no unusual circumstances are encountered. . Notice to proceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 13, 1998 Meetings with City ........................................ . Week of April 20, 1998 Preliminary design submittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. May 11, 1998 Meeting with City to review preliminary design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Week of May 18, 1998 Final design and specification submittal .................................. June 1, 1998 Meeting with City to review final design .......................... Week of June 8, 1998 Mn/DOT Review and Approval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. June 15, 1998 through July 10,1998 City Council Approves Plans. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 13, 1998 Ad for bid. . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. July 17 through August 14, 1998 Open bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., August 18, 1998 Award ......................................................... August 24, 1998 Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. September 1, 1998 through October 31, 1998 City of Shore wood Exhibit B - Compensation I Schedule - Plan 1 WSB Proposal 028.98 A. WSB oIf AsmcJma. fir. CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98-_ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERIVCES AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR TRUNKIDGHWAY 7 ACCESS MODIFICATIONS WHEREAS, Resolution 97-109 approved various access closures and modifications to Trunk Highway 7; and WHEREAS, the City of Shore wood has been selected as a recipient of $378,000 for financing of a portion of said access closures through the Minnesota Department of Transportation Municipal Agreement Program; and WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, Inc has submitted a proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services for said project and found to be acceptable to the City Council of the City of Shorewood; . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shore wood, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to WSB Associates, Inc. for preparation of Project Plans, Specifications, and Construction Estimates in accordance with the proposal submitted and attached hereto as "Exhibit A" ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April, 1998. . Tom Dahlberg, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk Exhibit A Scope of Services Project No.1: TH 7 Access Closures / Intersection Improvements Task 1 - Design Surveys A Design Survey will be conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc which will provide topographic information and elevations for the areas around and adjacent to the access closures and TH 41/shopping center entrance. It is assumed that up to three (3) days of survey time will be required to provide this information. A detailed base map in metric format will be provided as part of this task. Task 2 - Intersection / Street Design A. Preliminary Design: Preliminary access closure and intersection design will be completed for the proposed improvements including anticipating striping and lane configurations. This will be based on previous concepts. Should any additional right-of-way be required, it will be identified at this time. . B. Final Design: This task will include developing final construction plans for the required street closures and intersection improvements. This will include any detail sheets required, layout sheets, including profiles and applicable cross sections, as well as pavement section design. (It is assumed that WSB will rely on existing soils information. If soils information is required, it will be performed as an extra service). c. c Special Provisions: A set of special provisions addressing all required improvements will be completed in a format consistent with the City of Shore wood requirements. The bid proposal will be prepared as a part of this phase, including incorporating the city-designed sheets and specifications. . D. Cost Estimate: A cost estimate will be developed based on Mn/DOT's Cooperative Agreement Policy addressing all items included in the intersection / street improvements. E. Meetings: It is assumed that up to four meetings will be held as part of this task. These meetings will be held in conjunction with the meetings as outlined in the traffic signal design task (Task 3). City of Shore wood E'Chibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 1 :VSB Proposai 028.98 Exhibit Task 3 - Traffic Signal Designs A. Preliminary Signal Design: A preliminary traffic signal design will be developed by WSB & Associates, Inc at TH 7 and TH 41 / shopping center entrance to accommodate the proposed intersection configuration. The preliminary plan will include the location of the source of power, all poles and control equipment. This plan will be reviewed with the City of Shorewood and MnlDOT. B. Final Signal Design: Following comments from the City and Mn/DOT on the preliminary design, a final design will be completed. Design of traffic signal will be in conformance with all applicable state and local electrical codes, the Federal and State Manuals on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) State Aid Standards. The final design will include; all applicable detail sheets, intersection layout and wiring diagram. The final plans will also include provisions for Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) system and any required mast arm signing and interconnection. c. Special Provisions: A set of special provisions will be developed for the traffic . signal system and mast arm signing. These special provisions will be based on Mn/DOT standards specifications. These special provisions will be incorporated into the bid proposal prepared for the project D. Cost Estimate: An estimate of cost for the signal system components will be developed as a part of the total project estimate of cost. E. Meetings For The Traffic Signal System: It is anticipated that four (4) meetings will be held as part of the preliminary and final design. One meeting will be held with the local power company to determine the location and routing of the source of power for the intersection. Two meetings will be held with the City, one following the preliminary design to review the intersection layout and addressing any' concerns with the traffic signal system. The second meeting will be held following the final plans. One meeting will be held with Mn/DOT to review the plans and assure all . items that may be of concern to them have been addressed. Task 4 - Preconstruction Services A. Final Plans and Specifications: WSB will develop and distribute the plans and specifications to prospective bidders. WSB will charge for the bid proposals as payment for printing changes. The City and appropriate agencies will not be charged. B. State Approvals: WSB will submit this project to MnlDOT for review and approval. Any comments made by Mn/DOT will be addressed and their approvals will be obtained. City of Slzorewood E,lzibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 1 WSB p~r)Dosa{ 02898 . . C. Shop Drawing Review: All shop drawings from the manufacturers and contractor will be submitted through the City and reviewed by WSB to determine their adequacy prior to ordering of equipment. D. Contract Award: WSB will review the bids received by the City and make a recommendation to the City as to their adequacy and make a recommendation of an award of the contract Task 5 - Mn/DOT Coordination As discussed in the traffic signal design and intersection / street design tasks coordination with Mn/DOT will occur throughout the design process. In addition to this, we will assist the City on obtaining and executing the cooperative agreements for the intersection improvements. Task 6 - Construction Services A. Construction Staking: WSB personnel will be available for construction staking services. Our survey crew would locate all components of the traffic signal system in addition to the street improvements necessary. This work would be completed on an hourly basis. B. Construction Inspection Services: WSB would assist the City in whatever level of construction services they would require. This would include either day-to-day inspection or an as-needed service during critical portions of the contract. City ofSlzorewood Exhibit A - Scope ofSe,....ices - Plan I WSB Proposal 028.98 Exhibit B Compensation / Schedule Project No.1: TH 7 Access Closures / Intersection Improvements Estimated Cost Based on the scope of services, as outlined in Exhibit A the cost to provide such services will be as follows: Task 1 Design Survey (Hourly - 30 Hours at $93.00/hour) ....................... $ 2, 700. Task 2 Roadway Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ...................... $24,000. Task 3 Traffic Signal Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ................... $8,400. Task 4 Preconstruction Services (Hourly - not-to-exceed) .......................... $2,000. Task 5 MnlDOT Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,500. Task 6 Construction Services (7% of Actual Construction Costs) .................. $35,000. Total Cost ................................................. $73,690. . A 1998 Fee Schedule is attached. Schedule WSB will deliver a final set of plans and specifications to the City of Shorewood within the frame required by the City. This time schedule is assuming no unusual circumstances are encountered. Notice to proceed. . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 13, 1998 Meetings with City ......................................... Week of April 20, 1998 Preliminary design submittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. May 11, 1998 Meeting with City to review preliminary design..... ... .. ... . . ... ... Week of May 18, 1998 . Final design and specification submittal .................................. June 1, 1998 Meeting with City to review fmal design ......................... . Week of June 8, 1998 MnlDOT Review and Approval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. June 15, 1998 through July 10, 1998 City Council Approves Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 13, 1998 Ad for bid . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. July 17 through August 14, 1998 Open bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .. August 18, 1998 Award ......................................................... August 24, 1998 Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. September 1, 1998 through October 31, 1998 City of Shorewood Exhibit B - Compensation! Schedule - Plan! WSB Proposal 018.98 I~BI .+ .4~.btr Item 3E is to be deleted from the City Council agenda . . .3e MAYOR Tom Dahlberg CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL Kristi Stover Jennifer McCarty Jerry O'Neill John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612)474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhal/@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director :fPublic Works ~W March 7, 1998 . FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for Preparation of a Traffic Study, and Traffic Signal Design - County Road 19 and Country Club Road As indicated in the Capital Improvement Program, a traffic study is to be prepared which analyzes the impact of a traffic signal at County Road 19 and Country Club Road. It is anticipated that the traffic study would occur in 1998, with construction in 1999. . Hennepin County has agreed to the need of the signal and will participate in approximately 63 percent of the construction costs. The remaining portion would be funded using Municipal. State Aid funds. The Capital Improvement Program indicates that the City of Shorewood' s portion would be $105,000. The actual portion of construction costs for Shorewood are estimated to be approximately $42,000 with the remaining portion being allocated to right of way acquisition. Attachment 1 is the excerpt from the proposal for Professional Engineering Services for preparation of a traffic study and design for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection. Engineering costs associated with the project are $44,500, with a portion dependant upon construction costs. The percentages listed here appear to be appropriate for this type of project. Therefore, it is recomlnended that the resolution accepting the proposal by WSB and Associates, Inc. for ~rofessional Engineering Services be approved. A resolution is attached for your consideration. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 31-. Project No.3: CSAH 19 atSmithtown RdlCountry Club Drive Intersection Improvements Task 1 - Traffic Study A traffic study will be completed that will address the needs and requirements for safe and efficient intersection operation. This will include the analysis of turning traffic, accident data, traffic flow on adjacent roadways, and the intersection capacity and Level of Service. The results of this task will be a report outlining the intersection requirements and what safety improvements should be considered at this intersection. Task 2 - Traffic Signal Justification Report A Traffic Signal Justification Report will be prepared which outlines the requirements for a traffic signal installation. This report will be prepared in a format suitable for submission to Hennepin County and MnlDOT State Aid. Task 3 - Preliminary Intersection Concept Design A Preliminary Intersection Concept Design will be completed that will document the recommended safety improvements (Task I) and their impact to adjacent businesses. It is assumed that up to one (1) day of survey time will be required to provide enough data to develop a Concept Plan. This plan will be in a form detailed enough to determine right-of-way needs and begin initial conversations with adjacent businesses and the City. A preliminary construction cost estimate will be prepared. This plan will be reviewed with Hennepin County for inclusion in their 1999 Capital Improvement Program. . Task 4 - Roadway Design A. Preliminary Design: A preliminary intersection design will be completed for the proposed roadway improvements including anticipating striping and lane . configurations. B. Final Design: This task will include developing final construction plans for the required roadway improvements. This will include any detail sheets required, layout sheets, including profiles and applicable cross sections, as well as pavement section design. (It is assumed that WSB will rely on existing soils information. If soils information is required, it will be performed as an extra service). C Special Provisions: A set of special prOVIsIons addressing all required improvements will be completed in a format consistent with the City of Shorewood requirements. The bid proposal will be prepared as a part of this phase, including incorporating the city-designed sheets and specifications. City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Attachment 1 D. Cost Estimate: A detailed cost estimate will be developed, based on Hennepin County Funding Guidelines, addressing all items included in the intersection improvement. E. Meetings: It is assumed that up to four meetings will be held as part. of this task. These meetings will be held in conjunction with the meetings as outlined in the traffic signal design task (Task 3). Task 5 - Traffic Signal Designs A. Preliminary Signal Design: A preliminary traffic signal design will be developed by WSB & Associates, Inc to accommodate the proposed roadway intersection configuration. The preliminary plan will include the location of the source of power, all poles and control equipment. This plan will be reviewed with the City of Shorewood and MnlDOT. B. Final Signal Design: Following comments from the City and Mn/DOT on the preliminary design, a final design will be completed. Design of traffic signals will be in conformance with all applicable state and local electrical codes, the Federal and State Manuals on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT) State Aid Standards. The final design will include; all applicable detail sheets, intersection layout and wiring diagram. The final plans will also include provisions for a future Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) system and any required mast arm sIgmng. . C Special Provisions; A set of special provisions will be developed for the traffic signal system and mast arm signing. These special provisions will be based on Hennepin County standards specifications. These special provisions will be incorporated into the bid proposal prepared for the project. . D. Cost Estimate: An estimate of cost for the signal system components will be developed as a part of the total project estimate of cost. E. Meetings For The Traffic Signal System: It is anticipated that four (4) meetings will be held as part of the. preliminary design. One meeting will be held with the local power company to determine the location and routing of the source of power for the intersection. Two meetings will be held with the City, one following the preliminary design to review the intersection layout and addressing any concerns with the traffic signal system. The second meeting will be held following the final plans. One meeting will be held with Hennepin County to review the plans and assure all items that may be. of .concern to them have been addressed. City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Page 7 Task 6 - Preconstruction Services A. Final Plans and Specifications: WSB will develop and distribute the plans and specifications to prospective bidders. WSB will charge for the bid proposals as payment for printing changes. The City and appropriate agencies will not be charged. B. Hennepin County and State Approvals: WSB will submit this project to Hennepin County and Mn/DOT for review and approval. Any comments made by Hennepin County and MnlDOT will be addressed and their approvals will be obtained. C. Shop Drawing Review: All shop drawings from the manufacturers and contractor will be submitted through the City and reviewed by WSB to determine their adequacy prior to ordering of equipment. D. Contract A ward: WSB will review the bids received by the City and make a recommendation to the City as to their adequacy and make a recommendation of an award of the contract. . Task 7 - MnlDOT Coordination As discussed in the traffic signal design and roadway design tasks coordination with Hennepin County and Mn/DOT will occur throughout the design process. In addition to this, we will assist the City on obtaining and executing the cooperative agreements for the intersection improvements. Task 8 - Construction Services A. Construction Staking: WSB personnel will be available for construction staking services. Our survey crew would locate all components of the traffic signal system in addition to the roadway improvements necessary. This work would be completed on an hourly basis. . B. Construction Inspection Services: WSB would assist the City in whatever level of construction services they would require. This would include either day-to- day inspection or an as-needed service during critical portions of the contract. City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Page 8 . . Project No.3: CSAH 19 at Smithtown Rd/Country Club Drive Intersection Improvements Estimated Cost Based on the scope of services, as outlined in Exhibit A the cost to provide such services will be as follows: Task 1 Traffic Study (Hourly - not-to-exceed) .................................. $5,000. Task 2 Signal Justification Report (Hourly - not-to-exceed) .... 0 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . $1,750. Task 3 Preliminary Concept Design (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ....0................. $3,000. Task 4 Roadway Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ..........0.. 0 . 0 . . . . . . $71200. Task 5 Traffic Signal Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ................... $7,200. Task 5 MnlDOT Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . $1,500. Task 6 Preconstruction Services (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ............. 0 . . . . 0 . 0 . . . 0 $2,000. Task 7 Hennepin County Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ..0................ $1,500. Task 8 Construction Services (7% of Actual Construction Costs) ...... .... . . . . . . . . . . $15,400. Total Cost ............................... ..... . .. . . . . . . . .. . $44,550. A 1998 Fee Schedule is attached. Schedule WSB will deliver a final set of plans and specifications to the City of Shore wood within the frame required by the City. This time schedule is assuming no unusual circumstances are encountered. Notice to proceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . April 13, 1998 Meetings with City ......................................... Week of April 20, 1998 Preliminary design submittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 6, 1998 Meeting with City to review preliminary design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Week of July 13, 1998 Final design and specification submittal ............................... August 10, 1998 Meeting with City to review final design ....................... Week of August 17, 1998 Hennepin County/Mn/DOT Approval . . . . . . . . . . August 24, 1998 through September 28, 1998 City Council Approves Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 12, 1998 Ad for bid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 6 through December 4, 1998 Open bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 8, 1998 Award ....................................................... December 14, 1998 Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Spring/Summer 1999 City of Shore wood E;"hihit B - Compensation / Schedule - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98-_ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERIVCES AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT COUNTY ROAD 19 AND COUNTRY CLUB ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has petitioned Hennepin County for the installation ofa traffic signal at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 19 and Country Club Road; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has conducted a preliminary study and has determined the need for said traffic signal; and WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, Inc has submitted a proposal to provide . Professional Engineering Services for said project and found to be acceptable to the City Council of the City of Shorewood; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shore wood, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to WSBAssociates, Inc. for preparation of Project Plans, Specifications, and Construction Estimates in accordance with the proposal submitted and attached hereto as "Exhibit A" ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April, 1998. . Tom Dahlberg, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk Project IVO. 3: CSAH 19 atSmithtown RdlCountry Club Drive Intersection Improvements Task 1 - Traffic Study A traffic study will be completed that will address the needs and requirements for safe and efficient intersection operation. This will include the analysis of turning traffic, accident data, traffic flow on adjacent roadways, and the intersection capacity and Level of Service. The results of this task will be a report outlining the intersection requirements and what safety improvements should be considered at this intersection. Task 2 - Traffic Signal Justification Report A Traffic Signal Justification Report will be prepared which outlines the requirements for a traffic signal installation. This report will be prepared in a format suitable for submission to Hennepin County and Mn/DOT State Aid. Task 3 - Preliminary Intersection Concept Design . A Preliminary Intersection Concept Design will be completed that will document the recommended safety improvements (Task 1) and their impact to adjacent businesses. It is assumed that up to one (1) day of survey time will be required to provide enough data to develop a Concept Plan. This plan will be in a form detailed enough to determine right-of-way needs and begin initial conversations with adjacent businesses and the City. A preliminary construction cost estimate will be prepared. This plan will be reviewed with Hennepin County for inclusion in their 1999 Capital Improvement Program. Task 4 - Roadway Design A. Preliminary Design: A preliminary intersection design will be completed for the proposed roadway improvements including anticipating striping and lane configurations. . B. Final Design: This task will include developing final construction plans for the required roadway improvements. This will include any detail sheets required, layout sheets, including profiles and applicable cross sections, as well as pavement section design. (It is assumed that WSB will rely on existing soils information. If soils information is required, it will be performed as an extra service). C. Special Provisions: A set of special proVISIOns addressing all required improvements will be completed in a format consistent with the City of Shorewood requirements. The bid proposal will be prepared as a part of this phase, including incorporating the city-designed sheets and specifications. City of Shorewood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Exhibit A D. Cost Estimate: A detailed cost estimate will be developed, based on Hennepin County Funding Guidelines, addressing all items included in the intersection improvement. E. Meetings: It is assumed that up to four meetings will be held as part of this task. These meetings will be held in conjunction with the meetings as outlined in the traffic signal design task (Task 3). Task 5 - Traffic Signal Designs A. Preliminary Signal Design: A preliminary traffic signal design will be developed by WSB & Associates, Inc to accommodate the proposed roadway intersection configuration. The preliminary plan will include the location of the source of power, all poles and control equipment. This plan will be reviewed with the City of Shorewood and Mn/DOT. B. Final Signal Design: Following comments from the City and Mn/DOT on the preliminary design, a final design will be completed. Design of traffic signals . will be in conformance with all applicable state and local electrical codes, the Federal and State Manuals on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) State Aid Standards. The final design will include; all applicable detail sheets, intersection layout and wiring diagram. The final plans will also include provisions for a future Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) system and any required mast arm Slgnmg. C. Special Provisions; A set of special provisions will be developed for the traffic signal system and mast arm signing. These special provisions will be based on Hennepin County standards specifications. These special provisions will be incorporated into the bid proposal prepared for the project. D. Cost Estimate: An estimate of cost for the signal system components will be . developed as a part of the total project. estimate of cost. E. Meetings For The TraffIC Signal System: It is anticipated that four (4) meetings will be held as part of the preliminary design. One meeting will be held with the local power company to determine the location and routing of the source of power for the intersection. Two meetings will be held with the City, one following the preliminary design to review the intersection layout and addressing any concerns with the traffic signal system. The second meeting will be held following the final plans. One meeting will be held with Hennepin County to review the plans and assure all items that may be of concern to them have been addressed. City of Shore wood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Page i . . Task 6 - Preconstruction Services A. Final Plans and Specifications: WSB will develop and distribute the plans and specifications to prospective bidders. WSB will charge for the bid proposals as payment for printing changes. The City and appropriate agencies will not be charged. B. Hennepin County and State Approvals: WSB will submit this project to Hennepin County and Mn/DOT for review and approval. Any comments made by Hennepin County and Mn/DOT will be addressed and their approvals will be obtained. C. Shop Drawing Review: All shop drawings from the manufacturers and contractor will be submitted through the City and reviewed by WSB to determine their adequacy prior to ordering of equipment. D. Contract A ward: WSB will review the bids received by the City and make a recommendation to the City as to their adequacy and make a recommendation of an award of the contract. Task 7 - Mn/DOT Coordination As discussed in the traffic signal design and roadway design tasks coordination with Hennepin County and Mn/DOT will occur throughout the design process. In addition to this, we will assist the City on obtaining and executing the cooperative agreements for the intersection improvements. Task 8 - Construction Services A. Construction Staking: WSB personnel will be available for construction staking services. Our survey crew would locate all components of the traffic signal system in addition to the roadway improvements necessary. This work would be completed on an hourly basis. B. Construction Inspection Services: WSB would assist the City in whatever level of construction services they would require. This would include either day-to- day inspection or an as-needed service during critical portions of the contract. City ofShorewood Exhibit A - Scope of Services - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 Page 8 Task 1 Traffic Study (Hourly - not-to-exceed) .................................. $5,000. Task 2 Signal Justification Report (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ....................... $1,750. Task 3 Preliminary Concept Design (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ...................... $3,000. Task 4 Roadway Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ...................... $7,200. Task 5 Traffic Signal Design (6% of Actual Construction Costs) ................... $7,200. Task 5 Mn/DOT Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,500. , Task 6 Preconstruction Services (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ......................... $2,000. Task 7 Hennepin County Coordination (Hourly - not-to-exceed) ................... $1,500. . Task 8 Construction Services (7% of Actual Construction Costs) .................. $15,400. Project No.3: CSAH 19 atSmithtown RdlCountry Club Drive Intersection Improvements Estimated Cost Based on the scope of services, as outlined in Exhibit A the cost to provide such services will be as follows: Total Cost ................................................. $44,550. A 1998 Fee Schedule is attached. Schedule WSB will deliver a final set of plans and specifications to the City of Shorewood within the frame required by the City. This time schedule is assuming no unusual circumstances are encountered. Notice to proceed. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 13, 1998 . Meetings with City ........................................ . Week of April 20, 1998 Preliminary design submittal. .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . July 6, 1998 Meeting with City to review preliminary design .................... Week of July 13, 1998 Final design and specification submittal ............................... August 10, 1998 Meeting with City to review final design ....................... Week of August 17, 1998 Hennepin CountylMn/DOT Approval . . . . . . . . .. August 24, 1998 through September 28, 1998 City Council Approves Plans. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 12, 1998 Ad for bid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 6 through December 4, 1998 Open bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 8, 1998 Award ................ ... . . ....... ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 14, 1998 CORStruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Spring/Summer 1999 City of Shorewood E.r:hibit B - Compensation,' Schedule - Plan 3 WSB Proposal 028.98 : i . . ~----- .-; --..--.....--.-... /..:::::: 'l'tieIUU 01 de S~SelliMl e,.","ltittf eede1e .; '-~9r' :, ;;,. c; 1 .~'-, .q;"..Jr..( March 31, 1998 -< ~.i - J:----:::-..... __...... =.-:-:::-- Jim Hurm City Administra,tor City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, Mn 55331 Re: Annual Report from the Friends Dear Jim, Enclosed is the annual Income Statement & Balance Sheet for the Friends for the year ending 1997. The receivable set up in 1997 for $5,000 represents our expectation to receive lost income from the bonding. company. Would you please make the other Cities aware of the availability of this report and let me know if there are any questions. Sincerely, ----- Robert Bean Treasurer 5735 Country Club Rd Excelsior, MN 55331 1F5 ~- 4 . 7~ ot de S~ Seniolt/~ ~ ANNUAL lNCOME AND EXPENSE REPORT 1/1/97 Through 12/31/97 INCOME Donations CorparataDonati.ans $.. 12.13Z.00 Private Donations $ 7,425.00 Total Donations. ~62.00 . $ 683.18 Interest Income Room Rental Group. 2. - Gav't $. 18Q.00 Group 3 - So. Lake Civic $ 650.00 Gr0llfl.4 - So_Lake. Residents $.. 6Q~.00 Group 5 - Non-So. Lake $ 75.00 Total Room Rental . $, t,.51D..OO TOTAL INCOME $22,355.18 EXPENSES Operating Expense . Acctg...& Tax Reporting. $.. 2:).00 Garbage $ 163.49 Insurance. $. 4~~.00 Janitorial $ 1,728.66 Mise.. $.. 14.71 Rental Advertising $ 816.58 Supplies. $. 8_1~35 Telephone $ 296.26 Utilities $ t,753..69 Total Operating.. Expense. $10,44.1.74 INCOME LESS EXPENSE& $11 ,!13'.44 " ~ 7~ ot de S~ Seniolt/~ ~ Balance Sheet Summary 1/1/97 Through 12/31/97 199.7 1996 Cash on Hand $ 14,465.55 $ 12,186.42 Investments $.. $.. 3.0.000.00 . Capital Improvements to Building $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 furniture $. 3-9,224.86 $. Leasehold Improvement Equipment 1,028.04 Furnishings 5,740.31 Kitcbeo equipment 352.62 Tota~ beasehoJd .ovement $ 7;120.97 $- Receivables $ 5,000.00 $ $ 125,811.38 $ 102,186.42 . MEMORANDUM CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Tom Dahlberg . COUNCIL Kristr Stover Jennifer McCarty Jerry O'Nein John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 · www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net -- TO: Mayor and City Council ~ ~/ James Hnnn, City Administrator tJll/ . . FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: March 7, 1998 RE: Agenda Items 6A, 6B, and 6C Agenda Items 6A, 6B, and 6C are the modifications to the Water ordinances and Water Connection Polices, as drafted during previous work sessions with the City Council. A brief presentation of these items ~ be conducted during Monday night's City CounCil meeting. . -~- ,"-"., n .~- A Residential Com'!IlInity on Lake -....(:f " ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 903 - WATER USE AND SERVICE OF THE SHORE'VOOD CITY CODE l'ADOPTINC ""AN ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPfAL WATER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 903 of the Shorewood City Code is h~reby repealed in its entirety and the following added in its place: SECTION: . 903.01: 903.02: 903.03: 903.04~: 903.054: 903.05: 903.06: 903.07: 903.08: 903.09: 903.10: 903.11: 903.12: 903.13: 903.14: 903.15: Purpose and Intent Compliance With Provisions Private Wells Water Service Connections Water Turn-On and Shut-Off Fees Private v.,' ells Installation and Construction Requirements and Specifications Service Pipes Meters Water Rates and Charges Water Connections Served by Adjacent Municipalities Authorized Water Shut Offs Conservation Measures Restricted and Prohibited Acts Discontinuance of Service Mandatory Hook Up, Commercial and Multiple-Family Residential Users 903.16: Right of Entry Powers 903.17: Disclaimer of Liability 903.18 : Water Assessment Process Peliey- 903.19: Amendment - Notice 903.20: 903.19: Violation . 903.01: PURPOSE AND INTENT: The City Municipal water system (hereinafter called the water system) shall be operated as a public utility and convenience from which revenue will be derived, subject to the provisions of this Chapter. 903.02: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS: No person shall make, construct or install any water service installation, or make use of any water service connected to the water system except in the manner provided in this Chapter, nor shall any person make, construct, install or make use of any installation connected to the water system contrary to the regulatory provisions of this Chapter. 903.03. PRIVATE WELLS: 2 Pursuant to the current State Well Code and the Minnesota Plumbing Code, private wells may be constructed or maintained and continued in use whether or not connection is made to the water system. In no event shail there be a means of cross-connection between the private well and the Municipal water system at any time. Hose bibbs that will enable the cross-connection of the two (2) systems are prohibited on internal piping of the well supply system. The threads of the boiler drain of the well volume tank shall be removed of the boiler drain hose bibb replaced with a sinkfaucet. (Ord 313,9-23-96) /':t )/!/)Fe.....Ii" -$I.-A- " '~ 903.04J.: WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS: Subd. 1. Existing Service Stubs: Service stubs have been installed to serve some homes and businesses presently located in the City. For those homes and businesses, the connections are ready for use by the existing structures in the City. a. Permit to Connect, Fee: A permit must be obtained to connect to the water system. The fee for each permit shall be as set by Council resolution I, Such fee shall include inspection and turn-on services performed by the City. b. Conditions of Permit: The permit fee shall be paid at the time of making application for water service. In addition thereto, before any permit shall be issued, the following conditions shall be complied with: (1) No permit shall be issued to tap or connect with any water main or water system of the City either directly or indirectly from any lot or tract of land unless it shall be determined that: (a) The lot or tract of land to be served by such connection or tap has been assessed for the cost of construction of the water main and water plan system with which the connection is made; or (b) The proceedings for levying such assessments have been or will be . commenced in due course; or (c) A connection charge has been paid. (2) A water meter, meter horn, and remote reader shall be purchased obtained from the City at the time permit is applied for2. (3) If the lot is served by the eastern service district water tower and is below an elevation of nine hundred seventy five feet (975'), a pressure reducing valve (PRV) shall be purchased obtained from the City at the time the permit is applied for if a new connection or upon notice by the City if an existing connection. (4) Inspections: All property service lines shall be inspected by the City Water Inspector before the lines are covered to insure proper construction of the line and connection to the service stub. The owner or contractor shall give at least twenty four (24) hours advance notice to the City Water Inspector when the service pipe is ready for . inspection. (5) Turn On and Shut Offs: Only an authorized City employee shall turn on or shut off any water supply at the curb stop. I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. 2. Fees shall be as provided in Section 1301.02 of this Code. ,')/to r~J\:'(j(];. .... Subd. 2, New Service Stubs; Application for Water Service Connection: In the event additional connections or stubs to existing water trunk or lateral facilities are required or desired, applications shall be made at the City Hall on forms furnished by the City. a. Applications: All such applications for service stubs shall be made by the owner of the property to be served, or his duly authorized agent, and shall state the size and location of the service connection required, and the applicant shall, at the time of making application, pay to the City the amount of fees required for the installation of the service connection as hereinafter provided. The application shall also contain the name of the owner, a description of the property, lot, block and addition, name of road upon which the property fronts and the signature of the applicant, or his agent, agreeing to conform to the rules and regulations that may be established by the City as conditions for the use of water. . b. Performance Bond: For the purpose of assuring and guaranteeing to the City that the installation of the service connection shall fully comply with all of the other terms and provisions of this Chapter, the applicant agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit or a corporate surety bond in the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder. c. Inspections: All property service stubs shall be inspected by the City Water Inspector before the stubs are covered to insure proper construction of the stubs and connection to the water main. d. Additional Requirements: All requirements set forth in Subdivision 1 of this Section shall be applicable to this subdivision. Subd, 3. Connection Charge: Uno assessment has been levied and no assessment proceedings will be completed in due course, a connection charge shall be made to the owners of the lot or tract of land to be served. Such charge will be in accordance with and pursuant to resolution of the City Council 1. . 903.054: WATER TURN-ON AND SHUT-OFF. FEES: A fee as established by resolution of the City Councill shall be charged for turning on or shutting off water except in instances where a connection permit has been obtained by the property owner. 903.05. PRIY ATE 'VELLS:...2 Private wells may be eOBstructed or maintained and cOfltill1:led ifl use whether or not cOBflectioB is made to the '.vater system. In no event shall ther-e be a means of cross connectioB between the priyate well aad the :Municipal water systern at aay time. Hose bibbs that will enable the cross connection of the two (2) systems are prohibited on internal piping of the well supply system, Tlle threads of the boiler drain of the well volume tank. shall be removed of the boiler draifl hose bibb replaeed with a sink faucet. (Ord 313, 9 23 96) I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. 2. See Chapter 506 of this Code. City ()r'SIU1Ff:<i'oor) .~ 903.06: INST ALLA TION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Subd. 1. Supervision: All work performed within the limits of the City shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code as amended and the Ten States Standards and shall be under the direct supervision of the City Water Inspector and Public Works Director. Subd. 2. Authority to Do Work: Only persons authorized by this Chapter shall tap any distributing main or pipe of the water system, or insert stopcocks or ferrule therein. Subd. 3. Excavations:! If the installation is to be in a surfaced street, the location of the water main shall be ascertained from the City Engineer and, upon completion, such installation shall be inspected by the Public Works Department. Prior to construction within the street, notice shall be given to the City Water Inspector, School District, United States Post Office, Police and Fire Departments, and City Public Works Director. Such notice must be given at least three (3) days prior to the excavation for laying of the service pipe, and the connection must be made before three o'clock (3:00) P.M. After approval by the Public Works Department, the street shall be restored to its previously existing condition as directed and approved by the Public Works Department. The expense of such construction and restoration shall be borne by the applicant. . Subd. 4. Separate Connections and Meters: No more than one housing unit or building shall be supplied from one service connection except by special permission of the City Council. Whenever two (2) or more parties are supplied from one pipe, connecting with the distribution main, each building or part of the building must have a separate stop box and a separate meter. Subd. 5. Property Service Lines: All installations of property service lines shall comply with the following: a. Property service pipe must be laid with sufficient waving to allow not less than one foot (1 ') extra length and in such manner as to prevent rupture by settlement. b. Property service lines must be placed not less than seven and one-half feet (71/2') below surface or finished grade, whichever is lower, and arranged so as to prevent rupture by freezing. . c. A shut off or other curb stop shall be installed at the property line and placed so as to be protected from freezing. d. All underground joints are to be mechanical (compression or flared, not sweated) unless otherwise approved by the City Inspector. e. Joints shall be kept to a minimum with not more than one joint used for service up to seventy feet (70') in length. I. See also Section 901.01 of this Code. ;'1 >'l.)n'~i''- . ..-' f. All joints and connections shall be left uncovered until inspected and tested at normal water line pressure. g. Connections at mains for domestic supply shall be at least one inch (1 "). h. No water pipe shall be connected with any pump, well, tank or piping that is connected with any other water supply other than the Municipal water system. i. Not more than one building shall be supplied from one service connection unless by special permission from the City Council. j. When two (2) or more buildings are supplied from one pipe, each building must have a separate stop box and separate meter. k. Prior to connection with the Municipal water system, all means of cross-connection to a retained private water supply shall be eliminated. 903.07: SERVICE PIPES: . Subd. 1. Maintenance and Repair: It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain the service pipe from the curb box into the structure. In the case of failure upon the part of the property owner to repair any leak occurring in his pipe within twenty four (24) hours after verbal or written notice thereof, the water will be shut off and will not be turned on until the. service charge, as established by resolution of the Council, has been paid and the leak repaired. When the waste of water is great, or when damage is likely to result from the leak, water may be turned off immediately pending repairs. Subd. 2. Abandoned Service Installations: All service installations that have not been used for one year, or for any reason have become useless for further service, shall be shut off at the curb stop. Any expense of the City shall be charged to the property and, if not paid within thirty (30) days, shall be treated as a delinquent account pursuant to this Chapter. 903.08: METERS: . Subd. 1. Meter Use Required: Except for extinguishing of fire, no person except authorized City employees shall use water from the water supply system or permit water to be drawn therefrom unless the same be metered by passing through a meter supplied by the City. Subd. 2. Installation of Meters: All water meters shall be installed by a licensed plumber in accordance with the following rules: a. The service pipe from the water main to the meter shall be brought through the floor in a vertical position. The stop and waste valve shall be installed approximately twelve inches (12") above the floor. S!:Ui":"i"/" 0" b. The meter shall be located so that the bottom is from twelve to twenty four inches (12"-24") above the finished floor line. The meter shall be set not more than twelve inches (12"), measured horizontally from the inside line of the basement wall, unless an alternate method is approved by the City Water Inspector. c. All meter installations shall have a stop and waste valve on the street side of the meter. In no case shall there be more than twelve inches (12") of pipe exposed between the point of entrance through the basement floor and the stop and waste valve. A stop and waste valve shall also be installed on the house side of the meter. Meter setting devices shall be of copper pipe or tubing from the terminus of the service pipe up to and including the house side stop and waste valve. d. A remote reader shall be installed on the outside of the building in which the meter is contained at a height of three feet to five feet (3'-5') above grade. Subd. 3. Maintenance, Repair and Replacement: a. Replacement of Meter: All water meters shall be and remain the property of the City and may be removed or replaced or changed as to size and type by the City whenever deemed necessary. '.. . b. Maintenance and Repair: The City shall maintain and repair all meters when rendered unserviceable through ordinary wear and tear and shall replace them if necessary. However, where any replacement or repair or adjustment of any meter is necessary because of damage from hot water backup, damage from freezing water, or damage from any act, carelessness or negligence of the owner or occupants of any premises, .any expense incurred by the City to repair said damage shall be charged against and collected from the property owner, and water service may be discontinued until the cause is corrected and the amount charged collected.' Subd. 4. Meter Tests: When a consumer makes a complaint that the bill for any past services has been excessive, the City shall, upon written request, have such meter re-read. If the user remains dissatisfied and desires that the meter be tested, said user shall then make a deposit in an amount established by resolution of the City Council 1 , and the City shall test the meter. The user shall, if he so desires, be present when such test is made. In case a test should show an error of over five percent (5%) of the water consumed in favor of the City, the deposit will be refunded to the user and a correctly registering . meter will be installed and the date of written request and the minimum charge shall not be affected. In case the test shows an accurate measurement of water or an error in favor of the user, the amount deposited shall be retained by the City to cover the expenses of making such test. 1. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. ,,. Subd. 5. Unauthorized Tampering With Meter: All water meters shall be inspected and sealed by the City Water Inspector. No person not authorized by the City shall connect, disconnect, take apart, remove the seal, or in any manner change or cause to be changed or interfere with any such meter or the action thereof. (Ord. 210, 5-23-88) Subd. 6. Calibration of Water Meter and Remote Reader: On or before May 1 each year, the City shall mail to each consumer a meter reading card. The consumer shall be responsible for recording the readings for the water meter and remote reader upon such card and shall return such card to the City on or before May 20. Failure of the consumer to return such card to the City by May 20 will result in a.late fee being assessed to the consumers account, such fee to be established by City Council resolution 1. The City shall analyze such cards and identify those which indicate a difference in excess of ten thousand (10,000) gallons. The City shall calibrate water meters and remote readers which have a difference in excess often thousand gallons (10,000) and shall inform the consumer of any difference in the readings and of the amount due thereon. From and after May 20, 1993, the consumer shall be responsible to pay for any and all differences in readings between the water meter and remote reader which indicate amounts due for water consumption. (Ord. 249, 1-13-92) . 903.09: WATER RATES AND CHARGES:l . Subd. 1. Rates and Charges Established: a. Water Service Rates: The water rate due and payable to the City by each water user for water taken from the Municipal water system shall be at a quarterly rate established by a resolution of the City Council 1. Where service is for less than a quarterly period, the quarterly charge will be prorated on a monthly basis. (Ord. 210, 5-23-88) (1) Minimum Rate for Low Income Residents: A minimum charge is established for residents having low incomes. The charge shall be at two-thirds (2/3) of the regular minimum rate; provided, that consumption is under ten thousand (10,000) gallons per quarter. Should the consumption exceed this minimum, the minimum rate reverts to the regular minimum rate. The criteria for determining low income is as set by the Hennepin County CDBG Program Income Limits for Very Low Income and family size. Residents must submit the proper application and income disclosure to be eligible for this rate. (Ord. 274, 5-10-93) b. Meter Charges: A charge for a water meter shall be made by the City. Property owners or users shall pay in advance before delivery of the water meter for installation. Said charge shall be as established by the City Council by resolution. 1. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. C'in: of Shorel"vood 'It" c. Water Turn On: The established turn-on fee will be charged for turning on water where service has been shut off for nonpayment of water billings, failure to repair a leak, discontinuance of service, or other reason specified in this Chapter. d. Estimated and Adjusted Rates: (1) In the event the water meter servicing any property is found to be operating in a faulty manner or to have become inoperative, the amount of water will be estimated in accordance with the amount previously used in comparable periods of the year. (2) The City Council shall be authorized to make adjustments in water charges when the amount billed is erroneous due to a meter deficiency or other mistake. e. Rates Outside City Limits: Rates due and payable by each water user located beyond the territorial boundaries of the City shall be determined by special contract. Subd. 2. Listing of Accounts: All accounts shall be kept on the books of the City in the name of the owner of the property served. All bills and notices sent out by the City shall be sent to the address of the property served. If nonresident owners or agents desire personal notice sent to a different address, they shall file an application therefor with the City. Any error in address shall be promptly reported to the City. (Ord. 210, 5-23-88) . Subd. 3. Bills for Services, Delinquencies, Discontinuance, Tax Assessments: a. Billing: Statements for charges for water service for a quarterly period shall be mailed to each property owner or user on or before the tenth day and shall be due and payable on or before the last day of the months of January, April, July and October following the quarterly period covered by the statement. (Ord. 219, 12-4..,89) b. Delinquencies: After the last day of the month in which payment is due, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the unpaid account balance will be assessed and added to the amount due on the account. If the balance due on the account is not paid in full within forty five (45) days of the day on which the account became due, a notice shall be sent to the property owner or user informing the property owner or user that the account is delinquent and that unless the account balance, is paid in full within fifteen (15) days, the water will be shut off and the prescribed shut -off fee will be assessed. c. Discontinuance of Service: If the property owner or user does not respond to the . notice given above, prior to the date indicated in the notice, and the statement remains unpaid, the water shall be shut off at SI]()relt'Cf)(;' the curb stop. Prior to the water being turned back on again, the property owner or user shall be required to pay all delinquent charges, plus penalties and shut-off fees, and the prescribed turn-on fee. d. Appeals to Discontinuance of Service: The property owner or user may appeal the notice to the City Council during the fifteen (15) day period set forth in Subd. 3(b). Water service shall continue to the appealing property owner or user pending the decision of the Council on the appeal. Upon the determination of the Council, the water may be shut off pursuant to Subd. 3(c) as set forth above. e. Tax Assessments: All delinquent accounts may be certified by the Clerk who shall prepare an assessment roll each year providing for assessment of the delinquent accounts against the respective property served. This assessment roll shall be delivered to the City Council for adoption on or before October 10 of each year and upon approval thereof, the Clerk shall certify to the County Auditor the amount due, plus a certification fee as established by resolution of the City Council, and the County Auditor shall thereupon enter such amount as part of the tax levy on such premises to be collected during the ensuing year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. (Ord. 260, 10-12-92) . 903.10: WATER CONNECTIONS SERVED BY ADJACENT MUNIC IPALITIES: The City Council has heretofore and will in the future enter into contracts with adjacent municipalities to provide water service to properties located within the City. All permits to be issued under this Chapter shall comply with the terms of such agreements. In instances where the cost of the water hook-up from the supplying city is included in full or in part as a quarterly charge, then such shall be added to the billing for the minimum quarterly water charge to be paid by the recipient. 903.11: AUTHORIZED WATER SHUT OFFS: In case of fire or alarm of fire, water may be shut off to insure a supply for the fire fighting; or in making repairs or construction of new works, water may be shut off at any time and kept shut off as long as necessary. . 993 City of Shqrewood 903.12: CONSERVATION MEASURES: Whenever the City Council shall determine that a shortage of water supply threatens the City, it may, by resolution, limit the time and hours during which water may be used from the water system for lawn and garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing and other uses specified therein. Appropriate notice of such limitation shall be given prior to the enforcement thereof. 903.13: RESTRICTED AND PROHIBITED ACTS: Subd. 1. Unauthorized Turn On or Shut Off: No person, except an authorized City employee or agent, shall turn on or off any water supply at the curb stop. A turn-on or shut-off fee in an amount equivalent to twice the prescribed fee shall be charged for the unauthorized turn on or shut off of any connection to the Municipal water system. Subd. 2. Unauthorized Use of Hydrants, Interference With System: No person, other than employees or agents of the City, shall operate fire hydrants or interfere in any way with the water system. Subd. 3. Supplying Water to Others: No person shall permit water from the water system to . be used for any purpose except upon his own premises unless written consent is fIrst obtained from the City. 903.14: DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE: Water service may be shut off at any curb stop connection whenever: Subd. 1. The owner or occupant of the premises served, or any person working on any pipes or equipment thereon which are connected with the water system, has violated, threatens to violate or causes to be violated, any of the provisions of this Chapter. Subd. 2. Any charge for water, service, meter or other financial obligation imposed on the present or former owner or occupant of the premises served is unpaid. Subd. 3. Fraud or misrepresentation by the owner or occupant of the premises served in connection with an application for service. . 903.15: MANDATORY HOOK UP, COMMERCIAL AND MUL TIPLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL USERS: The owner of a property used for commercial purposes or for multiple-family residential purposes, involving four (4) t':IO (2) or more dwelling units, situated within the City and abutting on any street, alley or right-of-way in which there is located a Municipal water trunk or lateral facility, is hereby required at his expense to connect to such facility in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter within ninety (90) days after the date of official written notice by the City Council to so connect. 490 City of Shorewood ("in' S,'l(}J'e~vo()(i 903.16: RIGHT OF ENTRY POWERS: Authorized City employees shall have free access at reasonable hours of the day to all parts of. every building and premises connected to the water system necessary for reading of meters and inspection. City employees shall be properly identified and shall display such identification upon seeking admittance to the building. 903.17: DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The City shall not be liable for any deficiency or failure in the supply of water to property owners or users, whether occasioned by shutting the water off for the purpose of making repairs or connections, or from any other cause whatever. 903.18 WATER-IMPROVEMENT PROCESS .\SSESS1\fENT POLICY Subd. 1. Scope and Purpose: The purpose of this subsection is to supplement the requirements of State law, to provide for the methods to initiate a water improvement, and to authorize the formulation of policies relating to allocating the costs for such public improvements. . Subd. 1. Scope and Purpose: This policy is intended to pro'lide a fair, equitable, and consistef1t means of allocating the cost of water improvements. Subd. 2. DefinitioBs: a. ASSESSMEl'IT R'\TE: The rate ased for City water assessments as computed under Subdivisio1'1 5. (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) b. BUILDING SITE: .^.n area of lafld 01'1 ,,';hich a building exists or an area of land meeting city code requirements OB which a building could be constructed. c. CONSTRUCTION COST: .'\mooot paid t<> coatractors for constructing the impro'lemeRts. . d. CONSTRUCTION INTEREST: Cost of financing the improvements from the time the project is initiated until the assessment roll is appro';ed by the City Council, less any interest earned 01'1 invested funds. The interest rate Vim be at the expected assessment rate. e. DWELLING UNIT: A residential building or portion thereof ifl.tended for occupancy by a family, but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, boarding or rooming houses, or recreational vehicles. f. EQUIV.\LENT RE8IDENTL\L UNITS: The 1'1umber of equi'/alem: residefltial units is det-ennined by square footage of the nonresidential parcel one unit per 10,000 square feet of land ar-ea or portion ther-eof. (Ord. 302, 7 10 95) g. LOT: Land occupied or to be occupied by a building and its accessory buildings, together with such open spaces as are requked under the provisions of Shorewoo?'s zoning regulation havi1'1g not less thaH the minimum area required by the ~on~g OrdiBance for a building site in the district in which such lot is situated and havmg Its principal frontage OR a street, or a proposed street approved by the Council. h. LOT: CORNER: A lot situated at the jU1'1ction of and abutting on two (2) or more intersecting streets; or a lot at the point of deflectio1'1 iB alignment of a single street the interior angle of which is one hundred thirty five degrees (135 0) or less. City a( Share\f(>h: 1. PROJECT COST (Total Cost of ImprOyemeBts): All construction costs, plus costs for administration, efIgineering, legal, fiscal, easemeflt acquisition assessing, and any project related work previously done but 1'1Ot assessed. j. RESIDENTL\L UNIT: .^I.. resideBtial unit is a platted siBgle family residential lot which, in accordance with the City's zomng and subdivision regulatioIl, cannot be further subdivided. Subd. 3. Special'^1ssessments: u. BeRefit PriIlciple: Special assessments, as authorized by Minnesota State La'.'!, Chapter 129, may be levied only upon property recei':ing a special benefit from the improvement. In Minnesota, the Constitution and courts apply this general rule by placing the follo'lling limitations upon the power to levy special assessments: 1) the rate must be uniform and consiste1'1t UpOB all property receiving special benefit; 2) the assessment must be confined to property specially benefited; and 3) the amount of the assessment must FlOt exceed the special beFlefit. The special assessmeflt is a fmancial tool employed by the City as a means of allocating the costs of specific improvement projects to the benefited properties and spreading those costs o'/er a FlHmber of yeaf'S as specified by the City Council. Special assessments are billed to the property OWf1er alO1'1g with real estate taxes. There is, ho'.'!ever, a distinct differeace betweeFl taxes and special assessments. Real estate taxes are a fuFlction of the real estate value as determined by the municipal assessor, while special assessments are a direct fimction of the enhancement of value or the benefit which a specific improvement gi'les to the property. b. Consisteflt & Eqaitable: ORce an improvement project is initiated and it is detennined that the improyements are necessary and desirable, the special assessment procedure is intended to eqaitably and consistently allocate and levy the cost of specific improvemeFlts to the benefited properties. The City must recover the appropriate portion of the expense of installing public improvements, if undertaken, while ensuring that each parcel pays its fair share of the project cost in accordance with these assessment guidelines. This policy sets forth the general assessment methods and policies to be utilized by the . City..,\dministrator and City EagiBeer when .preparing assessment rolls for approval by the City Council so as to assure uniform and consist-ent treatment to the various properties from year to year. The following policy is general in nature, and certain circumstances may justify de'/iatioBs from stated policy as det-ennined by the City Council. . Subd. 1. Special Assessment Procedure: '^1 flow chart on the Shorewood Public Impro'/ement. Process for Special Assessment projects giving a detailed explanation of the process is shown OR the next page. a. InitiatiRg the Proceedings: Impro'/ement proceedings may be initiated in anyone (1) of the follo'::ing three (3) v:ays: Subd. 2. Special Assessment Procedure: a. Initiating the Improvement: Improvement proceedings may be initiated in anyone ( 1) of the following three (3) ways: 5h(}re1 t.O()f_i (1) By a petition signed by the owners of not less than thirty-five percent (35%) of the frontage of the real property abutting on the streets named as the location of the improvement; (2) By a petition signed by 100% o~ the owners of real property abutting any street named as the location of the improvement. Upon receipt of a petition of 100% of the abutting property owners, the City Council must determine that it has been signed by 100% of the owners of the affected property. After making this determination, a feasibility report shall be undertaken and the project may be ordered without a public hearing;, or . (3) By the initiative of the City Council. Petitions for improvement shall be referred for Administrative report and estimated budget. A simple majority vote of the City Council is needed to start the proceedings. 'Vhether iffitiating the proceedings or acceptiag a petition requesting such proceedings, the City Council may simultaneously order a feasibility report on the proposed improyemeRt. Feasibility reports shall be paid for by the City in the case of water coastructioR projects and recouped once the project as completed under the terms of this policy. Not later than the time a petition is considered for acceptance by the City Council pursuant to either a.( 1) or (2) above, the petitioners shall have executed and delivered to the City an agreement whereby the petitioners agree to pay the cost of the improvement as defined in the agreement and agree not to contest or challenge either the assessment process or the amount to be assessed. b. Preparing the Feasibility Study: An improvement project which is initiated by action of the City Councilor by a 35% petition may be ordered only after a public hearing. Prior to adopting a resolution calling a public hearing on an improvement, the Council must secure from the City Engineer a report advising it in a preliminary way as to: (1) Whether the proposed improvement is feasible; (2) Whether the proposed improvement is consistent with Capital Improvement Planning; . (3) Whether the improvement should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; (4) The estimated cost of the improvement; (5) A proposed project schedule; and (6) Any other information thought pertinent and necessary for complete Council consideration. An improvement initiated by petition will not be deemed to be economically feasible unless the petitioners have agreed to pay the entire cost of the improvement minus any oversize cost and minus the present value of any additional estimated net revenues to the water fund occasioned by the improvement for a 15 year period. An improvement initiated by the City Council may not be deemed economically feasible unless the Council by at least a 4/5ths vote finds the above factors to be present after reducing the cost of sllch improvement by such amount as the Council in its reasonable discretion defines to be the appropriate City share of the improvement costs. Sho r2l t'{)(}(;' 1195 c. Holding a Public Hearing on the Improvement: Improvement projects which are initiated by a 100% petition may be ordered by the City Council without a public hearing if the City Council determines the project may be undertaken without unreasonable changes to the Capital Improvement Finance Plan or the petitioning property owners agree to pay 100% of the cost of the improvements. In. the case of a Council-initiated project or petition of less than 100% of abutting property owners, the Council must adopt a resolution calling a public hearing on the improvement project for which mailed and published notices of the hearing must be given. The notice of public hearing must include the following information: (1) The time and place of hearing; (2) The general nature of the improvements; (3) The estimated cost; and (4) The area proposed to be assessed. Not less than ten (10) days before the hearing the notice of hearing must be mailed to the owner of each parcel in the area proposed to be assessed. The notice of public hearing must be published in the City's legal newspaper at least twice, each publication . being at least one week apart, with the last publication at least three (3) days prior to the hearing. At the public hearing, the contents of the feasibility study will be presented and discussed with the intent of giving all interested parties an opportunity to be heard and their views expressed. e. ,^~d'/ertising for Bids: If the estimated cost of the improvement exceeds $25,000, bids must be adyertised for ifl the legal ne'.Yspaper and such otl1er papers and for such length of time as the City Couflcil deem.s desirable. If the estimated cost of the improvement exceeds $100,000, the advertisement must be in a paper published in a first class city, or in a trade paper not less than three (3) weeks before the last date for submission of bids. The notice must contain the foIlo'Ning information: City o!SllOreWlIod LiT\" Shor'!\t'ooa (1) The work to be done; (2) The time when bids will be publicly opened which must be not less than ten (10) days after the frrst publication of the adyertisement when the cost is less than $100,000, and not less that three (3) '.veeks after publications in all other cases, and (3). .^~ statement that no bids will be cOflsidered unless they are sealed and accomp~lUed by ~ash, a cashie:'s check, bid bond or certified check for such percentage of the bId as specIfied by the CIty Council. f. Awarding Contracts: Following receipt of the bids, tbe City Council must either: (1) Award the eontract to the lov/est responsible bidder; or (2) R.eject all bick;. The c~ntact mu~t be a':,:arded no later than OFle (1) year after the adoption of the resolHtlon ordenng the Impro'/ement unless that resolution specifies a different time limik . The City Council may purchase the materials and order the work done by day labor or in any manner it deems proper if: . . (1) The initial cost of the entire work does not exceed $25,000; (2) No bid is submitted after advertisement; or (3) The only bids are higher than the eFlgineer's estimate. g. Preparing Proposed :\ssessment Roll: The City Engineer and .'\dministrator/Clerk must calculate the amooot to be specially assessed against every parcel of land beFleflted by the imprQ':ement. The ar'6a to be assessed may be less than, but not more than, the ~ea proposed to be assessed as stated in the notice of public hearing on the Improvement. After fees and charges are prepared per Bubd. 6 of this Ordinance, the assessment roll will be prepared. The assessment roll should contain a description of each parcel of property aBd the assessment amount including any deferred assessments. The assessment roll must be filed with the City Administrator/ Clerk and be available for public inspection. (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) h. Holding Public Hearing on Proposed Assessments: '^L public hearing on tl1e special assessments must be held following pablished and mailed notice thereof. The notice of the assessment public hearing must include the following infDrmation: (1) The dat'6, time and place of the meeting; (2) The general nature of the improvement; (3) The area proposed to be assessed; ! IQ5 City o(Slwrew{)od Ci(':.- qt ShoreH'ood , ( 1) The total amount of the proposed assessment; (5) That the assessment roll is on file with the Clerk; (6) That written or oral objections will be considered; ~ the amount of assessmeFlts unless a (7). T?at ~o appe~ ma)ifi be tt~~ ~SrtyO owner is filed with the City Clerk prior written ObjectIOn SIgned b) theh a ecte:d'~g Efficer at the hearing; and to the hearing or presented to t e presI i . ment to the district COllrt by servmg (8) That the owner may appe~ the ass;s~"orking days after the adoption of the notice on the Mayor or C~ty Cl.erk wIthm t~:~~. ) ;~n (10) days after sllch appeal to the assessment and filing notIce WIth the court n I Mn Mayor or the City Clerk. . 131' hed in the legal newspaper at least The notice of the assessment heann~ must be pu . IS once, flOt less than tV/O (2) weeks prIor to the heanng. " ment hearing to the owner of each pa:cel The City Clerk must mail notlce of the ~~ess "'eeks rior to the hearing. The ~ed described in the assessme~t roll ~. least tili 0 .(22 n ationPrequired to be in the pHbl1shed . notice must also include, lfl ~dItlOn to e m arm notice, the following infQrmation. . . h ..... eelaf lat:! flIece or (1) The amount to be specially assessed agamst tl at pam parcel of land; eFHire assessment and the (2) The right of the property owner to prepay the person to ';f:hom prepayments must be made; been authorized by prepayment of the assessment has (3) Whether partial ordinance; " . . a made without the assessment of (1) The time '.vithm wmch prepa) meat ma) e int.erest; and within the assessment IS not prepaid (5) The rat.e of interest to accrue if the required time period. . ^ ssment hearing or at any adjoomment i. Adopting the .^..ssess~nts: . Lt the asse essments as proposed or adopt the thereof, the City COUBCH lllllY adOjll the ~".sseos....et differs foom the proposed assessments with amendments. If the adop f ce stating the amount of the adopted assessment, the clerk must mail the ov~re~~t? ~lude any and all deFerments on large assessment. The adopt~d assessment ro S In or unplatted parcels of land. . ^ ef of' ^ iter the adoption of the ass.essm~nt, j. Transmitting f..ssessme~t to CO~Rt~ d"u I ~t a~ ~~y of the assessment roll, mcluding the City Clerk must transIllit a ~ertl ~ ep IC . ^ uditor all deferred equivalent residentlal UllitS to the Count) . L . . . . . . . of the City that all properties shall pay Subd. 5 Special ^ ssessment PolICIes: It IS the polIc). th' benefit It is not intended that . . U fl al' avements as e} '.. their falr share of the C?st 0 oc Ampr f . "ements without paymg for them. any property shall receIve the bene tS 0 Impro. 1195 City of Shore wood ShO,'.CH'ood . a. Establishing an .\ssessment Rate' :g . ? bel?'.'/, the City C01:lflcil may chang~n~ a base rate as established in Sabdi'/ision 5 m~atlon. For the purposes of this sub .,,' ~ assess~ent. me ammally to allO'N for ~SIBg. the . index of construction costs d}~~SIt:' ~ !,nflauo.B rate shall be established Engmeenng News Record" or the "Co n <;It) S regIOn, as pablished by the nsumer rnce Index". (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) b. Base Rates: The City Council construction methods or materials :y change .the ?ase rate due to changes in topography or construction areas 0; oth anged cap~al Improvement costs, difficult '.vater service to the remainder of'the Cite: c~nges mherent !O the cost of providing careful study and report by the City En ~: ~ B~e .Rate "vill only be changed after rep?~ shall include, but not be limite gtneer mdicatmg a need for a change. This antlc~p~ted with regard to construction d to, the ch~be~ that ha',e occurred or are remaInlflg geographical area(s) of the Ch~~OdS, ~apltal ~roYement costs, and the I'J 1:0 tie ser. ed by CIty '.vater. c. Term of .^.:ssessment: Assessments f, '" t a year period unless the City Council det er:. a ar 1. s ould be assessed for a fifteen (15) appropriate. enmnes that some other period of time is more ? G~vernment OWBed Proflerties' P' . mcluding the City, will be assessed. th ropertles be~ongmb to government jurisdietions e same as pnvately oVlfled property. ' e. Non de'/elopable Land' S .a1 ^ deemed unbuildable due to' theP:CI. t . ..ssessments shall not be le'/ied Ofl properties co~pletelY ,:vithin zoned wetlaadsJUs ~~~~ o~ l;1ndeveloped lands lying wholly and ha. mg restncted soils as determiB~d b . theP ~n~, D~ protected wetlands and/or parcels of land are assumed to be builda61 t'l 1) ~uiJ.ding h;tspector. Howeyer, all. e un 1 pro len othervllse by the owaer. f. Interest Rate: The interest rate char a ?ebt issu~~e shall not exceed two pe~ceento(2~)es~m:nts fo~ all projects financed by Issue. ThIS IS necessary in order to . a 0 tenet mtarest rate of the bond t.o reinvest assessment prepayments :s~r~ ~ equate cash fl?w WRen tHe City is UBable of debt or when the City experiences H ~f erest rate suffiCIent to meet tHe iaterest. cost the event no bOBds are issued then th pro ~ err::s. of payment collection delinquencies. In two (2) percent greater than the "e ra a 0 mter~st on assessments shall BOt exceed pre':ious calendar year or the cu~~:a~ rate of u:t~rest on all bonds isseed in the special assessment installments shall b ~ket mumclpal bond rate. Interest on initial adop~ng the assessment. Owners must ~~n t~ fia~~: fro.m the date of the resolution the CIty Council regardin intere t no 1 e ) mail of any changes adopted b . those contained in the no~ce of +~erates or PJepayment requirements which differ fro~ 1:tt proposett assessment. g. ~a~nt Procedures: The nrone...... consIdenng payment of assessments: t' HJ owner has four available options when . (1) Tax PaymeBt If no action i a speCIal assessment installments "'ill s un ertaken by the property owner, then statement for the duratiOBOJ: +1.e n appear annually on the individual's nrone...... tax . t" 1:tt assessment term. t' t''' . J . 1195 City of SllOrewood eil.'.' (~r ,\;lo.~~elrood '17' , (2) Full Pa) , n IthIn 30 da 'S f tffient No mterest ",'1 pmpcrty ow:",:;; ~ dale of a80ptiOR i .. ollarged if lbe - of the 115S",,'''''''''::;': anY liH1e belWeoo 11"~8at..'e~""RI rQ!l. !B ,:s=~ is paid ...... (3) Partiol Pa .:efOot acorued 10 DOC....::31~~-=~' prepay ~ ~~ par ual payment ~,ent The pro}3eFty .. oAly be . roduelIOO of aBjI · ~<ner Ilas a ooe t' e"",,,ISed ",. h' _ ag .. 1Hl8 opp.'" . as..osmeRl roll.,' n _,I'llB tile 30 day ;'ri'::"'" I1ighor ..,e,o_Bt ;:U'Y to BlllIce · , 0 HIHIlediately foIlO'.vin' aIS ~ptlOn may (4) Pre ' g a opllOB of the ye I ' ~a) ment +fl . nr s mstallmeBt of ' , · property 9"'8er' . tJBie, prior t N pnoolpalllBd iner I ~ may, w,tIl tl.. """ . insIaIlIBeBt, ~ti;~~~mber, 15 wilhoot e~= tile ro_g <soos:""': ::. tile ou.....t o.llectiOR willI the re&eot tbfeagh DooeIBhor-3{ mlcrest ohargeo. Therea aooe at aBjI be redueed by tile aI ostale IlIl<"" payable tII sf the followiag yearo ~,.l,:r, the Bffi<! affiOBIll BfllIe iB<llaIh e OIl5UlBg year. The . ':' e leVIed for (5 ....RI. pnooIpal balllBOll "'ll ~) P ,fal "I. partiall . ~ 1 Prepayment of S . ~ prepaId subject to the foIl ..~eclal .^..~s~ssments Special assessments On mg provISIOn . (a) Partial s. may be prepayments shall be m a (b) ..... a e to the City Finan . Ilamal prepa)'Bl8llt oe DlfCE)Ior.. . . s may be a ma e not more th (<:) p _' aI lIB .ooe pe aI , . llHl propaymeRl r c...endar year en "InaI s .....y b . d ' h ^ 0 a,so,olBtlRl. (Ord. 304,; &"95~ affiOlHlts BOt leas lb... 10% . . .proal Proced . of lIIo ado}3tea H \:Ires. No app al the (;' ~ e" a WrilloB ob'eoli e IB"Y be takeB as to tile presiZg ,,~skalOr' s oinee O~d ~y the affected pro",;".::;to~!. 1lftY. ooseoslBtlRl Diolriot C er at the heariBg Th e ..",,""""At hellf' ~B6r IS filed with wiIbiB 300:.,bY serving BOtice ~f ~ property OWBer .....y :: :: pre_led to tile Di6lfiot Co..J~,: ~ ~optiOB of ~ opoo tile Mayor Por c:' ~d.smeRl lO Adminiskater. " ays after service ;:at llBd filing sHch ~~.strator . o. . appeal opoB the M ~e ...,tfl the I. Reapporli .,-a}or or City .:l Oflment U}3 b assessmeflt h a on and Di"isi ~ the City Coo:':""'" levied is sub..' oo'::'JheB a_I ofIORd a,ai . IBOtiOB, ~1;"'Y' OB applieati.2 of ~ ~::"dcd or S1ibdiVidelby e;:;/lueh a special . l1lStallmeAts of tn appertJoA ameng the .. -:- ef aBjI part of the In> t or otherwis.,. determiBes that s: :seOS!BCB1 agaiBst the :.... lots or "arcels iB :'a or OB tt5 OWA balance of the .0. appOrllOlHIlOBt will ct fOlBlIHllIlg BIlpaid lIBd e _I all the fumisltiBg of a o~"t """"."....Bl ~\::-y impair colleen::t ~ doo if ~ Stat..oos SectioA 41g ~~ry SllfOty bOAd iB :m _to The City COUBcilo li~ uepaId appeal shall.. m .-' ,subd, 3. Notice IlllB cases as ""p.cifI~d ,""'I'. fCljIlIre m lBO.t cases Eli" ,~d to or persOltally ",,'cd of the apporlioIBBeBl and' m Milmeo.!a ill an e<jUitable ;.. diBg the asseSlllBeBl bw,;;, lljlOB all oWBers of lIB' of the nght l<> .. IBOst praetiealPP":"'IBBeRl. If eljliitable , c. ~ on a aM or lot), part of the traet.. lIB admiBistnItiV()ly eff, IB,~ partIoalar caoe, sooh ""IS would reSll!t ectI T e. a procedure would 1195 ,"..~ .. lIeu "~'I - - . . Subd. 6. ..\ssessment Method: a. Unit Method ..\ssessments for City '.'1ater shall be made m accordance v:ith the fOlTIlllla ill the follov:ing table: Formula I LaRd Use ExistiRg Future Lot of Record/URits Newly Created Lots OF URitS Single Family R + I Multiple Family* R I 0.25 RU T I 0,25 TU I " . Property ZORed ~ .75 T Uel.5 T De Commercial But Not Yet Used :\s Such ZORed aRd 1.5 ~ Ue .75 T Del.5 T Ue Developed as Commercial Property Schools, Churches, R (10,000 s.f. of land or less) T (10,000 s.f. of land or less) C overRmeRt, aRd Other NORresideRtial 1.5R (over 10,000 s.f. of l.5 T (over 10,000 s.f. of Itmd) laaat In addition to the above, developers of new subdivisions vlill be required to install lateral mains . services and appurteflant it-ems at the time of platting. .' NeVI assessment charges applied against flewly divided or de'leloped land shall be credited the amount of assessment charges agaiflst the original parcel. T Trunk ~harge: 1\n assessment due at the time a nevI lot is created.. This charge may be leYled under any of the follov/iBg circumstances: a) '.vater is a'laHable, b) water '.vill be made a'/aHable p1:lrsuant to a subdivision agFeement, or c) the developer requests that the assessment be levied to avoid the obligatiofl to pay v:ater connection fees at a later date. R ..^J1 assessment levied against a lot '.vhen water becom.es available. U tt of dwelling units. Ue Number of equivalent residential units. 0198 Cit\' of Shorq\l'ood * Multiple family d\vellings include those buildings designed with two or more dwelling units. For the purposes of this ordinance, no more than 12 dwelling units will be allowed for each base rate ( R ) applied. .^..:ssessment f-ees and trunk charges are per structme. (Ord. 302, 7 10 95; Ord. 306, 10 23 95; Ord. 322,6 9 97) b. Comer Lots: Shall be assessable when water becomes available. Subd. 3. Deferred Assessments: a. The City Council may defer Special Assessments: On homestead property owned by a person who qualifies under the hardship criteria set forth below. b. Procedure: The property owner shall make application for deferred payment of special assessments on a form prescribed by the Hennepin County Auditor and supplemented by the Shorewood City Administrator. The application shall be made within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll by the City Council and shall be renewed each year upon the filing of a similar application no later than September 30. The City Administrator shall establish a case number for each application; review . the application for complete information and details and make a recommendation to the City Council to either approve or disapprove the application for deferment. The City Council by majority vote, shall either grant or deny the deferment and if the deferment is granted, the City Council may require the payment of interest due each year. Renewal applications will be approved by the City Administrator for those cases whereby the original conditions for qualifications remain substantially unchanged. If the City Council grants the deferment, the City Administrator shall notify the County Auditor who shall in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.194, record a notice of the deferment with the County Recorder setting forth the amount of assessment. Interest shall be charged on any assessment deferred pursuant to this Section at a rate equal to the rate charged on other assessments for the particular public improvement projects the assessment is financing. If the City Council grants an assessment deferral to an applicant, the interest may also be deferred, or the interest may be due and payable on a yearly basis up until the assessment period terminates and only the principal is . deferred. The decision as to whether the principal and interest or just the principal is deferred is decided by the City Council when considering the application. Conditions of Hardship: a. Any applicant must be 65 years of age, or older, or retired by reason of permanent and/or total disability and must own a legal or equitable interest in the property applied for which must be the homestead of the applicant, or b. The annual gross income of the applicant shall not be in excess of the very low income limits (50% of median) assetforth by family size in Hennepin County's Section Eight guidelines. Calculation of the total family income shall be determined by the summation of all available income sourCes of the applicant and spouse. 0198 903,18 903,19 (--:ity of Shor?H'f)(:d Income specified in the application should be the income of the year proceeding the year in which the application is made, or the average income of the three years prior to the year in which the application is made, whichever is less, and c. Permanent and/or total disability shall be determined by using the criteria established for "permanent and total disability"for Workman's Compensation, to wit: (1) The total and permanent loss of the sight of both eyes. (2) The loss of both arms at the shoulder. (3) The loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial members can be used. . (4) Complete and permanent paralysis. (5) Total and permanent loss of mental faculties. (6) Any other injury which totally incapacitates the owner from working at an occupation which brings him/her an income. An applicant must substantiate the retirement. by reason of permanent and/or total disability by providing a sworn affidavit by a licensed medical doctor attesting that the applicant is unable to be gainfully employed because of a permanent and/or total disability. Subd. 7. Deferred .'\ssessmeats: . a. The City Counoil may def-er Special .^.ssessments: On homestead property owned by a person 'l:ho qualifies under the hardship criteria set forth. below. b. Procedure: Tfle property owner shall make application for deferred payment of special assessments on a form prescribed by the HeflRepia COilat)' .^.1:lditor and supplement-ed by the Shorewood City .^.:dministrator. Tfle application shall be made '.vithin 30 days aft-er the adoption of the assessment roJI by the City Council and shan be renewed each year upon the fIling of a similar application no later than September 30. The City Administrator shall establish a case number for each application; revie'll the application for complete information and details and make a recommendation to the City Council to either appro':e or disappro'/e the application for deferment. Tfle City Council by majority vot-e, shall either grant or deny the defermeat and if the deferment is granted, the City Council may require the payment of interest due each year. Renev:al applications will be approved by the City .^...dministrator for tflose cases whereby the original conditions f-or ql:lalifications remain substaatially unchanged. If the City Council grants the deferment, the City f.dministrator shall notify tb.e County Auditor who shall in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 135.191, record a notice of the deferment with the County Recorder setting forth the amount of assessment. Interest shall be charged on any assessment deferred purs1:lant to this SectioB at a rate equal to the rate charged OR other assessments for the particalar public llnpr{)vement projects the assessment is financing. If the City Council grants an assessment deferral to an applicant, the interest may also be deferred, or the interest FBay be aee aB~ p~yab~e on a yearly basis up until the asseSSHleat period termi-Rates aBd only tbe p~nc~al ~$ def-erred. The decision as to whether the principal and interest or just the pnnClpal IS deferred is decided by the City Council when considering the application. Conditions of Hardship: a. .^.ny applicaBt must be 65 years of age, or older, or retired by reason of permanent and/or totw disability and must own a legal or eql:litable interest in the property applied for which must be the homestead of the applicant, or b. The anffilw gross income of the applicant shall not be in excess of the very 10\': income limits (50% of median) asset forth by family size in Hennepin County's Section Eight gl:lidelines. Calculation of the total family income shall be determined by the summation of wi available income SOllfces of the applicant and spouse. Income specified in the application saould be the income of the year proceeding the year in '.Yhich the application is made, or the average iHcome of the three years prior to the year in which the application is made, whiche';er is less, and c. Permanent and/or totw disability sha.il be detennlned by using the criteria established f-or "permanent and total disability" for 'N orkman's Compensation, to wit: (1) The total and permanent loss of the sight of both eyes. (2) The loss of both arms at the shoulder. (3) The loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial members . ca.n be used. (1) Complete and permanent paralysis. (5) Total and permanent loss of mental faculties. (6) f.ny other injuiy v;hich totally incapacitates the owner from working at an occupatiOB. which brings himlber an income. .An applicant must substantiate the r-etiremcnt by reason of permanent and/or total disability by proyiding a s'::om affidayit by a licensed medical doctor attesting that the applicant is l:lnable to be gainfully employed because of a permanent and/-or t-otal disability. (Ord. 300, 6 12 95) Subd. 8. City Council may adjust the [mal assessment as appropriate to satisfy the reql:lirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 429. (Ord. 302, 7 10 95) . S ubd. 4. Policies: The City Council shall establish and may from time to time modify policies pertaining for the fair, equitable and consistent allocation of the cost of water improvements. Such policies may relate to factors for determining economic feasibility, fees and charges for connecting to the system and such additional matters as the Council shall determine appropriate in its reasonable discretion. 903.19: AMENDMENT - NOTICE. This chapter may not be modified, amended or repealed until a public hearing is held thereon by the City Council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the city's official newspaper and in its city newsletter at least 10 days prior to the day of the hearing. Failure of any person to actually receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings provided a bona fide attempt to comply with these provisions has been made. 903.20903. 19: VIOLATION: Any person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 210, 5 23 88) Draft 1 - 2/11+R-8l98 City of Shcrewood . . ,. , CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, on April 13, 1998, the City Council of the City of Shorewood adopted Ordinance No. , entitled "an Ordinance amending Chapter 903-Water Use and Service"; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney has prepared a summary of Ordinance No. _, as follows: The amendment is a comprehensive revision of the City's policies, procedures and requirements for connecting to the municipal water system. Among the significant features of the amendment are the following: 1 . Hook up to the municipal system will only be required for commercial and for residential buildings of four or more units. Except for projects initiated by 4/5th vote of the city council, projects will only be approved if the persons requesting water are willing to pay for the entire cost of the improvement; and those who are not requesting the project acknowledge that they may be eventfully required by others to hook up. The future amendments of the ordinance can only be made following a public hearing proceeded by published notice. 4. Policy provisions contained in the ordinance are repealed and the council is to adopt, by resolution, new policies regarding the municipal water systems. 2. 3. A COPY OF THE ENTIRE TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS A V AILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD: 1. The City Council finds that the above title and summary of Ordinance No. _ clearly informs the public of intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Clerk is directed to publish this resolution, in lieu of publication of the entire text of ordinance No. _, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4. The City Administrator is directed to post a copy of the entire text of Ordinance No. - on the city bulletin board, beginning Apri120, 1998, and ending May 20, 1998. ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council on this 13th day of April, 1998. 2. 3. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR ~'B . . ;) CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY POLICY REGARDING THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City ordinance code authorizes the City Council by resolution to establish policy regarding the City's municipal water system; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that a clearly articulated policy statement will serve several important functions including. without limitation: 1. 11. iii. provide for the consistent application of rules and procedures; provide the justification for Council decisions in particular circumstances; adequately inform the public of the circumstances and requirements under which municipal water may be provided; and facilitate the development of long-range capital programs for the municipal water infrastructure; and IV. WHEREAS, in considering the adoption of such a policy and any future amendments, it is appropriate for the Council to take into account such matters as expectations based upon past practice, equity, revenue productivity, political accountability, together with the Council's vision of the role which municipal water plays in the future of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. Scope. This resolution shall apply to the City's municipal water utility only, and none of the provisions contained herein will be deemed, by implication or otherwise, to be applicable to any other municipal improvements. 2. Effect on Existing Improvements. Improvements for which assessments are pending or levied shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 903 of the City Code in effect on January 1, 1998, (or on the date of the levy of such assessment if earlier). Improvements which are the subject of executed development agreements shall be subject to such agreements whether or not the improvement has been constructed. Future connections to existing City lines shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 903 in place on January 1, 1998, unless the Council in its discretion determines otherwise on a case-by-case basis. A copy of the provisions of Chapter 903 in effect on January 1, 1998, is attached to this Resolution as Attachment A. 3. Agreement and Waiver. No improvement will be ordered until and unless the petitioners and all affected property owners have executed and delivered to the City an agreement and waiver in the form substantially shown in Attachment B. and all non-petitioning affected property owners have executed and delivered to the City a consent agreement in a form acceptable to the City shown in Attachment C. JBD137416 SH230-2 #-e. Resolution No. 98- Page 2 4. Hook-Up Following Initial Assessment. An individual applying to hook-up to City water installed after January 1, 1998, will be required to pay an amount equal to the assessment and other hook-up and connection charges paid by the individuals who initially hooked up to the improvement, together with interest. The Council may, but is not required to, provide for the payment of all or part of such charges over time and in a manner similar to a special assessment. 5. Effect of Resolution on Section 903.18. To the extent not inconsistent with the policy statements contained in this Resolution and any amendments to Chapter 903, the provisions contained in Section 903.18 of the code as of January 1, 1998, shall serve as guidelines to the Council in formulating decisions regarding municipal water. The Council is free to disregard such guidelines when it determines to do so would be in the best interest of the orderly administration of the municipal water program. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this _ day of . 1998. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR JBD137416 SH230-2 t.~ . . Subject: Strawberry Lane Reconstruction Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 20:30:20 -0600 From: Jim_Linder@fluoroware.com To: cityhall@dorthy.state.net I live at 6150 Strawberry Lane and will likely be unable to attend the Monday, April 13 meeting, but do have the following questions: 1. When is the construction likely to start and approximately how long should it take? 2. Will there be any evenings where we will not be able to get into our driveway? 3. Will the pavement be any wider than the current pavement? 4. At our address, will the road elevation be lower as previously proposed? Thank you in advance for your answers. I also applaud the method selected .~nd lack of assessments to individual homeowners. ~egards . Jim Linder . #7A Message Left on Shoreline April 10, 1998: Hi, my name is Chrisy Williams and I live on Strawberry Court - 26425 Strawberry Court and I'm calling about the reconstruction of Strawberry Lane. I received a letter that was sent out to all of the people abutting Strawberry Lane. The one comment I would like to make. ..I think it would be great if a paved type walking area could be applied along the side of the road. The road is very, very narrow and people are constantly using road to walk their dogs to the trail, or kids, it is really unsafe. It is hard to get two cars passed side by side on that road. I would encourage them to consider doing that on either side, but as long as it ran the length of Strawberry Lane. Other than that we think the road needs to be redone. It definitely needs to be redone because it has a lot of pot holes and is not in the best shape, but keep in mind maybe putting in a sidewalk or path or trail along that lane. Thank you. . . .11 MAYOR Tom Dahlberg CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL Kristi Stover Jennifer McCarty . Jerry O'Neill John Garfunkel 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474--0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM . FROM: TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator Lany Brown, Director of Public Works P7 DATE: April 10, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans, Specifications, and Estimates of Project 95-17 Strawberry Lane Pavement Reclamation Plans, specifications, and estimates have been prepared, and are ready for the competitive bidding process if the City Council deems appropriate. . The Capital Improvement Program earmarked $227,500 for the total project cost. Of which, $195,000 were reserved for construction. Attachment 1 is the Engineer's cost estimate for the pavement reclamation project. Estimated costs equal $193,350. Therefore, construction costs are estimated just below what was anticipated. It is recommended that the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate be approved, and that the advertisement for bid be published in the Sun Sailor for a public bid opening to occur on May 5, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.. A resolution is attached for your consideration. ~b 04/10/98 07:37 FAX 6125955773 OSM & ASSOC. 141002 ~ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE aSH PROJECT NUMBER: 97009.05 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES DATE: APRIL 8, 1998 PROJECT: STRAWBERRY LANE STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROJ. NO.: CITy PROJECT 95-17 SHOREUOOD, MINNESOTA BY: Paul T. Hornby, P.E. SCEDULE A . BASE BID Estimated Estimated Estimated J tern No Spec No Description Quantity Units Unit Price Item Total ..-......-..- ..-..---------------------..--------------- ---------- ---...-...---- -..--------.... ........--............-- 1 2021.501 MOB I L1ZATION 1 LUMP SUM 2,000.00 2,000.00 2 2021.501 CLEANUP 1 LUMP SUM 1,000.00 1,000.00 3 2022.DIV TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP SUM 5,000.00 5,000.00 4 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 525 sa YD 5.00 2,625.00 5 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 25 LlN FT 7.00 175.00 6 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 500 LIN FT 3.00 1,500.00 7 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (PLAN QUANTITY) 485 CUYD 10.00 4,850.00 8 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 1 100% CRUSHED QUR. 20 TON 15.00 300.00 9 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED ROCK 640 TON 12.00 7,680.00 10 221'.SPE CRUSHED LIMESTONE (FOR TRAILS) 45 TON 25.00 1,125.00 . 11 0240_501 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION (BPR) 6870 SY 3.00 20,610.00 12 0240_502 AGGREGATE BASE RECLAMATION 120 TON 12.00 1,440.00 13 0240.503 AGGREGATE BASE RECLAMATION (CV) 100 CY 12.00 1,200.00 14 2331.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COuRSE MIXTURE 625 TON 28.50 17,812.50 15 2331.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE 1025 TON 26.50 27,162.50 16 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 360 GALLON 2.50 900.00 17 2502.541 4" PERF PVC PIPE !>RAIN 3980 LIN FT 14.00 55,720.00 18 2502.541 8" PERF PVC PIPE oRAIN 565 LIN FT 20.00 11,300.00 19 0502.601 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN. CLEANOUT 14 EACH 175.00 2,450.00 20 0502.601 8" PVC PIPE DRAIN. CLEANOUT 1 EACH 250.00 250.00 21 0504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX 2 EACH 150.00 300.00 22 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING 12 EACH 250.00 3,000.00 23 0506.602 CONNECT INTO EXIS~ING STORM SEWER 3 EACH 500.00 1,500.00 24 0506.602 CONNECT INTO EXIS.ING Mil OR CB 4 EACH 500.00 2,000.00 25 2564.531 F&I SIGN PANELS TYPE W1-1R WITH POST 1 EA 200.00 200.00 26 2564.531 F&I SIGH PANELS TYPE W1-1L WITH POST 1 EA 200.00 200.00 27 2564.531 F&I SIGN PANELS TYPE W13-1 2 EA 75.00 150.00 28 2564.531 F&I SIGN PANELS TYPE W1-6 WITH POST 2 EA 250.00 500.00 29 0564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 300 lIN FT 1.50 450.00 30 2573.502 SILT FENCE,HEAVY DUTY 1400 UN FT 3.00 4,200.00 . 31 0573.SPE EROSION CONTROL FOR STORM DRAIN 2 EACH 200.00 400.00 32 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN 3100 SQ YO 3.50 10,850.00 33 2575.sPE lSBI 1 - A 1 LUMP SUM 4,500.00 4,500.00 ---.------......- TOTAL SCEDULE A - BASE BID $193,350.00 ----.............--..... SUB-TOTAL $193,350.00 -.............---....... GRAND TOTAL $193,350.00 OF >> . . . A resolution and advertisement for bid will be presented at Monday night's City Council meeting. This resolution, if approved, will authorize advertisement for bid and establish a time and place for the bid opening. ~\..OOI1~ ~~.& '" "LOO" FLOORS PLUS 5660 COUNTY ROAD 19 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 "."Q8 "'-' .:~ . ,i,,,,"'....J j~~.=--,-- -------- TO: Mayor Tom Dahlberg & Shorewood City Council Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 FROM: David E. Johnson Owner & Manager of Floors Plus Inc. DA TE: March 23, 1998 . RE: Monday, April 13, 1998 Agenda Please list the following items on the agenda for the Monday, April 13th, City Council Meeting. I plan to attend and would like to have time to review my concerns. If you have any questions, you may contact me on my cellular phone (919-1914) prior to that date. If I don't hear from you, I will plan to speak to the City Council at the meeting. * Snowmobiling * David Perkins water main job . * Traffic Light at County Road 19 and Smith town Road * Expansion of the Floors Plus, Inc. Building * Drainage of the Smithtown Crossing Shopping Mall * Nagle Sign cj:1L-.~ David E. Johnson 1fB .. . . 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 PI2I2 APR 1216'98 11:52 DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. 3128 Dean Court Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESIDENTIAL STUDY REVISED VERSION 2.1 Hello, I'm of Decision Resources, Ltd., a survey research firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of Shorewood to speak with a random sample of residents about parks and trails. I want to assure you that all individual responses will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE) 1. How long have you lived in the City of Shorewood? TWO YEARS OR LESS.......l 2.1 TO 5.0 YEARS... .....2 5.1 TO 10.0 YEARS.......3 10.1 TO 20.0 YEARS......4 OVER TWENTY YEARS... ....5 DON'T KNOWjREFUSED......6 2. How would you rate the quality of life in Shorewood -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor? EXCELLENT.. ..... ...... ..1 GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ONLY FAIR... .. .. .. .. .. . .3 POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5 3. What do you like most about living in Shorewood, if any- thing? 4. And, what do you like least about living in Shorewood, if anything? The Shorewood Park System is composed of four neighborhood parks __ Badger, Cathcart, Manor, and Silverwood Parks -- and one large community park -- Freeman Park. For each of the following parks, please tell me which, if any, have members of your household used during the past year? (IF "USED, II ASK:) How would you rate the park and recreational facilities in that park? (ROTATE) EXC GOO FAI POO NOT USE USE DKR 5. Badger Park, located by City Hall on Echo Road? 6. Cathcart Park, located on Second Street by the border with the City of Victoria? 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 iF9A 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 PI2I3 II., APR 1216 '98 11:52 NOT USE EXC GOO FAl POO USE DKR 7. Manor Park, located at Manor Road and Suburban Drive? 1 2 3 4 5 6 8. Silverwood Park, located at Covington Road and Old market Road? 1 2 3 4 5 6 9. Freeman Park, located off of Eureka Road? 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" IS POSTED FOR ANY PARK (5) , ASK,: 10. Why do you feel that way? H' HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS USED ANY PARK, ASK: For each of following facilities in the Shorewood Parks, please tell me if you or members of your household use them.... (ROTATE) . 11. Grassy areas for leisure activities? 12. Playground equipment? 13. Picnicking facilities? 14. Tennis courts? 15. Basketball courts? 16. Volleyball courts? 17. Baseball and Softball fields? 18. Soccer and Football fields? 19. Trails at Freeman Park? 20. Skating and Hockey rinks? 21. Concession Stand at Freeman Park? YES 1 1 1. 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1. 1. NO 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 DKR 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Now, I would like to (re-)read you a list of facilities in Shore- . wood Parks. Whether you use them or not, please tell me how valuable you think it is for a community to offer than facility -- very valuable, somewhat valuable, not too valuable, or not at all valuable? (ROTATE) VRV SMV NTV NAA DKR 22. Grassy areas for leisure activities? 23. Playground equipment? 24. Picnicking facilities? 25. Tennis courts? 26. Basketball courts? 27. Volleyball courts? 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 ~ 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 P04 APR 06 '98 11:52 VRV SMV NTV NAA DKR 28. Baseball and Softball fields? 1 2 3 4 5 29. Soccer and Football fields? 1 2 3 4 5 30. Trails at Freeman Park? 1. .2 3 4 5 31. Skating and Hockey rinks? 1 2 3 4 5 32. Concession Stand at Freeman Park? 1 2 3 4 5 I would like to read you a short list of six types of recreation- al developments. If each would cost approximately the same amount of funds and no property t~~ increases-- W<;<,t;e uecel:Jl:.iaxy. . . . " ""!Y33 I~ j:, J, J. J'.Y . \ ' Which one, if any, would you choose as your top priority? 34. And, which one, if any, would be your second priority? . - '\---' ~-ki! tt-v~V:Z"-v3 -"."-(.'-0-'J i -14. A',:;>./'/ d,\y.A IJ j~' v -- --eBTDOOR MUNICIPAL SWIMMING Poem TRAILS ;~7 ICE ARENA OPEN SPACE FORCPRESERVATION) IN - LINE SKATING 'PARK --- ADDITIONAL BALLFIELDS All equally (vol) None of above (vol) Don't Know/Refused (;~~;"\:).,i"\." Moving on. . .. FIRST SECND 1 1. 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 35. Does the City of Shorewood cur- rently have sufficient park land to meet the needs of your house- hold? YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 NO. oil . .. . . . . . . . . . . . to . .. .. . .. ,. 2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3 . 36. Do you or members of your household regularly use leisure- time recreational facilities or programs in other cities? (IF "YES," ASK:) What types of facilities or programs are you using in these other cities? 37. In particular, do you or members of your household regularly use trails in other cities? YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 NO. . . . . . . . ... . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. ...2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...3 3 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 P05 APR 06 '98 11:53 ;).: . "J. ~\ 38. If the City of Shor~woo~_~e to acquire presently(undevelopeCC' land, would you moat prefer it to l:l~~~as rec::rea~ional _~reas,~ucli as athlet~c f1elds -- and playgrounds, or\natural areas, such as wooded areas and wetlands? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) po you feel strongly that way? . RECREATION/STRONGLY. ....1 RECREATION.... ..........2 NATURAL.................3 NATURAL/STRONGLy..... ...4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...5 Moving on..... -~$ In the following questions you will be asked for your opinions about a trail system in the community. please keep in mind that this discussion has nothing to do with the current LRT trail which goes through the City of Shorewood. 39. What, if anything, do you see as the major positive of a trail system? . 40. And, what, if anything, do you see as the negative of a trail system? 41. Would you favor or oppose the development of a trail system in the City of Shorewood? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that way? STRONGLY FAVOR..........l FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE....... ..4 DON'T KNOWjREFUSED......5 IF A POSITION IS TAKEN, ASK: 42. Could you tell me one or two reasons why you feel that way? . If the City of Shorewood were to considercdivelopinSDa trail system in the community, one option might be for tlie City to develop a connected citywide trail system, in which residents could use the trails for recreation and for traveling throughout the community. Another option might be for the city to develop a series of non~connected trail links solely for recreational pur- poses. 4 .,. 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 P06 APR 06 '98 11:53 STATEMENT A.............1 STATEMENT B.............2 STATEMENT C...... .......3 STATEMENT D. ............4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5 Which of the following statements most closely reflects your opin- ion: A) I would strongly prefer a city- wide connected trail system; B) I would strongly prefer non- connected trail links; C) I have no strong preferences and would support either option; D) I opposed both options. If a trail system were developed in the City of Shorewood.... 43. 44. . . 52. How likely would you or members of your household be to use a trail -- very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely? VERY LIKELy.... .........1 SOMEWHAT LIKELy.... .....2 NOT TOO LIKELy....... ...3 NOT AT ALL LIKELY.......4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5 45. IF "VERY LIKELY" OR "SOMEWHAT LIKELY," ASK: Would you and/or members of your household use the trail primarily for recreational activities, for traveling within the City, or for both? RECREATIONAL... .... .....1 TRAVELING. ..... .........2 BOTH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...4 Which of the following recreational activities would you or members of your household participate in on the trail sys- tem.... (ROTATE) 46. Rollerblading? 47. Bicycling? 48. Walking and Hiking? 49. Jogging? 50. Cross-Country skiing? 51. Something else? (OTHER: How close to your residence would a trail need to be for you to use it -- in your front yard, across the street, down the block, up to 3 blocks away, or could it be over a quarter of a mile away? 5 YES NO DKR 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 WOULD NOT USE....... ....1 FRONT yARD........ ......2 ACROSS STREET..... ... ...3 DOWN THE BLOCK..........4 UP TO 3 BLOCKS. ... ... ...5 QUARTER MILE AWAY.......6 DON'T KNOW......... .....7 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 825 P07 "t APR 06 '98 11:54 53. Would you support or oppose a trail link in your area if the trail were to run along your side of the street? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly that way? STRONGLY SUPPORT........l SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ..:2 OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE.........4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....... 5 Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes.... 54. What is your age, please? Stop me 18-24........... .........1 when I read the interval which 25-34...................2 contains it. 35-44. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 45 - 54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 SS - 64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 65 AND OVER.............6 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 55. What is the highest level of formal education you completed? HIGH SCHOOL OR LESS.....l HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE....2 VO-TECH/TECH COLLEGE....3 SOME COLLEGE............4 COLLEGE GRADUATE........5 POST-GRADUATE...........6 REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . Could you tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household -- be sure to include yourself.... 56. First, persons over 6S years old? NONE.....................J. ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 TWO OR MORE.............3 57. Other adults, under 65 years old? NONE....................1 ONE.. lit . . . . .. . . . .. . . " ." " ". . .. .. ,,2 TWO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 THREE OR MORE...........4 58. School-aged children? NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. ONE.................... .2 TWO.................... .3 THREE OR MORE...........4 59. pre-schoolers? NONE... .. " .. . " ......... " .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ..1 ONE. . . . " .... " .f" " " " .. .. .. .. .. .. .." .. .. :tl . TWO OR MORE.............3 Thank you for your time. Good-bye. 60. Gender (BY OBSERVATION) MALE. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .1 FEMALE.. .. .. .. _. .. .. .. .. ... .. " . .. . .+ t. ".2 61. Area of the City PRECINCT ONE............1 PRECINCT TWO............2 PRECINCT THREE. . .. . .. . . .3 6 Virginia V. Kolstad 848 Third Avenue Shor~.Minnesota.55331 Ph: 612474 0882 Fax: 612401 0411 __ i - /~-.-::::.-;-"- . ':~.'!F= it = i~ !! :iL!j i =:-- 00 ~-'"- - : {i: il.L\}i .~ 1 I998 i,-',-, . '! I ....; '- 3y March 30,1998 Ms. Deborah Borkon Chair, Planning CommisSion 5590 Shore Rd. Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Resignation Dear Deborah: . This letter is to advise you that I will be resigning from the planning commission effective May 1, 1998. I have accepted an offer of employment for Cendant Corporation in Parsippany, New Jersey. Although I am looking forward to this opportunity, I will misS the many mends that I have made through my involvement with the city. I am hoping to attend both meetings in April. However, it is likely that the April 14th meeting may be my last one. There is some chance that I may have to leave before that meeting, but I am hoping to be here. I will do my best to provide my comments on the land use plan and the communication tower ordinance to Brad before I leave. If there is anything else you would like from me, please let me know as soon as possible. I have enjoyed my association with the city. I have enjoyed working with the all the individuals, staff, planning commission, council and task force, that I have been privileged to work with. I have learned a great deal and feel fortunate to have been a part of the Shorewood City Govemment. . Sincerely, tv Virginia Kolstad Planning Commissioner cc Jim Hunn Brad Nielson Roger Champa Tom Dahlberg -IF 9c- To: Mayor and City Council James C. Hurm, City Administrator From: Date: March 31, 1998 Re: Excelsior Chamber of Commerce e. The Chamber of Commerce government membership list is as follows: City of Excelsior City of Greenwood Excelsior Community Library Excelsior Post Office Friends of Barb Sykora Senator Ed Oliver The major reason that the City of Excelsior is a member is to keep up on all the activities planned by the Chamber of Commerce. e tp/OB (. . . . Messages on Shoreline: April 2. 1998: Hi, I'm calling in regard to the thought of pet owners cleaning up after their pets when they are out walking or whatever. The very thought of it occurred to me this morning and I can't believe I'm reading it in the news, and I think it is just great, and I hope it is incorporated and it becomes a ruling. I also would like to see something done about all the cats running loose. We are concentrating on the dogs and I've noticed a great increase in cats running allover. I am a bird lover and it's really bothering me. Good luck on both of these, you have my support. When I went out on a walk this morning and saw what I saw! Good luck. April 6. 1998: I feel strongly that our current animal ordinance should be expanded to require pet owners to clean up after their dogs, on the trails, public parks and on private property. Thank you very much. I am a Shorewood resident, have been for forty years. ********* Hi, I'm calling about the animal ordinance. I absolutely think that pet owners should be required to clean up after their animals, especially on public land. I can't tell you the number of times we have been at parks and one of my children has stepped in some dog left behinds, on the trail when we are biking, it gets on the tires and is so annoying. I clean up after my children, I don't leave their dirty diapers around, so I think it very appropriate to require pet owners to clean up after their, mostly dogs, cats seem to clean up after themselves, on the trail and at parks, I think it would be very, very appropriate. ********* Yes, hi. I am responding to the question as to whether or not the animal ordinance should be expanded to require pet owners to clean up animal feces. I really think it is absolutely necessary. We have a lot of dogs around and people walk their dogs and they also walk their dogs down these public trails and also area parks. It really is a problem. In fact, they walk their dogs for the purpose of getting our of cleaning up their own yards. I really think it is absolutely necessary to expand this ordinance. Thank you. ********* Hi, my name is Becky Schultz and I am a new resident in Shorewood, and I was calling regarding your query about animal ordinances. I am a pet owner, I own two dogs and I think, I'm surprise there isn't already an ordinance requiring people to clean up after their animals. I always do and I being a pet owner get doubly angry when I have to step in their mess or clean it up from my yard. So count me in as being very supportive. If there is anything I can to do help, my number is 474-8202. Thanks very much. ********* -#JO~ . Y, Hi, I just read the recent Communications Corner in the Citizen Informer regarding getting people to clean up after their pets, and we recently bought a puppy. We live in Shorewood and have been walking the trails and I cannot believe the amount of poop that is on the trail as well as in Freeman Park. You can't even walk without stepping in it and being a new animal owner, I think it is terrible that people do not clean up after their pets. It really makes a mess and you have to be careful where you are walking all the time. I think it is something that would make our trail much more appealing to talk on or travel on if you don't have to worry about stepping on dog poop every 5'. I am all for requiring people to clean up after themselves. I know there is one spot on the trail that does require bags. Perhaps you could put more bags and more trash cans out and maybe encourage people to do it more often. I strongly think that that should be enforced. ********* I have been looking over the City of Shorewood's newsletter and notice a comment in the Communication Corner regarding animals - people cleaning up after their pets. I cerntainly think it is importnat that this be done. I live off Smithtown Road and I still see dogs running loose and cats running loose in the neighborhood and considering the water . problesm we have in our lakes, I think it very important that an ordinance be established as . soon as possible to handle this problem. Thank you. ********* I am responding to the Communication Corner regarding a proposed animal ordinance cleanup rule. We live in Shorewood on Mearfield Circle. I am appauled at the dog feces that I have to clean up in my front yard and on the public right of way along Old Market Road is referred to as dog toilet. It is a serious problem and should be addressed. Thank you. Cheryl Samples, 474-2197. ********* Hi - my name is Amy Heit. I live at 5727 Wood Duck Circle in Shorewood. I am calling about "should pet owners be required to clean up after their animals?" Yes. On public land? Yes On private land? Yes. And it also needs to be enforced, especially in my neighborhood. I appreciate this. Thank you. . ********* Hi my name is Bill Bukovec. I'm at 5335 Eureka Road. My phone 470-7444. I am calling about the dog waste issue. I am in full support of an ordinance which will require dog owners to clean up after their pets. I think they should clean up because we don't expect people to leave other waste in public such as beer cans, yard brush, kitchen scraps, and other things such as that. If someone walked by my house and the horse dropped its crap on the street, I would expect someone else to clean it up. Also, I maintain the area between my house and the street and I do have a corner lot, and I do not appreciate stepping in dog crap when I am moving my grass or killing weeds or anything else I do. If the ordinance does pass, I would appreciate a sign stating the ordinance located .near our yards or that part of our yards. If you want to give me a call, 470-7444. Thank you; ********* \... .. Good morning. I am calling about the cleaning of pet poop on private and public property. I find it disgusting that people walk dogs, big dogs especially by the lake, and don't clean it up. Also, I would like to say our citizens would like you to make some kind of ordinance so that dogs are tied up. We see lots of dogs running loose. They startle us and we can fall. Please think about that too, and make sure that people keep their dogs tied. Thank you. April 7. 1998: . Hi, this is Marty Wellens and I would like a response, I have two comments. My phone number is 470-9395. First one, I wonder if anyone has every proposed in one of our parks, putting in a frizzbee golf course. They are very small and pretty cheap to erect. I know they have them at Lone Lake Park which is just inside of 494, and you take, I can't remember the name of the street, but just on the west side of Hopkins. They got a frizzbee golf course. They have one there. I was wondering if it had ever been proposed before to put a frizzbee golf course in. And I would like to propose it. The second issue was you were talking about expanding the ordinance on animals to require people to pick up after their pets. I guess I would like to opposed that. The way you have it worded, if my dog goes off the trail into the lower area of either side of the trail, I would have to go down and pick that up. That doesn't seem real reasonable, that is public property. I can see on the trail, but if my dog goes on the side of the trail on the edge, I don't see any real need to pick that up. So I guess I would like to oppose it the way it is worded right now. Thanks. Bye. ********* April 8. 1998: . As a member of South Tonka Little League, as a coach and Board member over the last 8 years, I have witnessed many Shorewood residents bring their pets to the City Parks of Freeman, to bring their pets to the parks in their vehicles and to let them run around on the little league fields, they are fenced in and the dogs can run lose and not worry about them running off. These same fields are the fields kids play on later that evening. I think the City of Shorewood should ban all pets from city Parks and at the very least they should require those pet owners to clean up after their pets when they do bring them to the parks. My name is Dave Steinkamp. I am on the board of directors for South Tonka Little League. My phone number is 474-8464. ********* Hello, my name is Mary Wiersome, my phone number is 401-0010. I am responding to the comment about the question about whether the current animal ordinance should be expanded to require pet owners to clean up animal feces. I most certainly think so. I think when, after all we are names "Shorewood" because we are on the shore of Lake Minnetonka an ordinance is absolutely necessary. My guess is that the records of dog registrations would confirm that, but based upon what I see walking past my home each day, its got to be a high number at least in my area, and we are only 1/2 block from the lake. It is obvious most of the feces runs down into the storm sewers and out into the lake and I think it is the only responsible thing to do is to expand the current animal ordinance. I would like to know what is going on to expand that ordinance and what city residents can do to encourage that. I for a fact know many friends who would agree it should be expanded and would like to know what we can do. Most of us feel very strongly about this. We like to use the lakes and we like to be able to walk and like our children to run around without that kind of nuisance. Thank you. Bye. ********* Hi, this is Christine Healy, I am calling in response to pet owners cleaning up after their dogs. Yes, I think this is something that we should have people do. I am a pet owner myself and I feel I have the responsibility as a pet owner to clean up after my dog. So that is my opinion. Thank you. My name is Christine Healy. ********* Hi, I am just calling in regard to the article about cleaning up after your dog and I couldn't be in more agreement. I hope it is something that gets accomplished. Thank you. ..{ ;"'--.'" . . April 8. 1998: In your Shorewood news informer, you have requested a reply "should the current animal ordinance be expanded?" I have said yes. I think the owners should have to clean up after the animals, either on public land or on private land. So my comment is Yes. Get them to clean it up. ********* . Yes, I am calling about the proposal by somebody in Shorewood that we should change the city ordinancne on the cleanup of animal feces. It seems kind of funny to me that in Shorewood we always want to change the ordinance for one or two residents because they complain. I always thgouth things should be decided by a majority vote or opinion, but Shorewood seems real anxious all the time to change the ordiannce, like in this particular case where it says they got a recent call from a Shorewood resident. It is kind of ridiculous that we put this much time and effort into changing something when only one person has a complaint about it. I think we have better things to do. People should be responsible enought to take care of their pets and their dog feces without the City of Shorewood sticking their nose in people's private lives. . .like they are so good at. That's all I have to say. ********* . . ., . CKNO 22720 22721 22722 22723 22724 22725 22726 22727 22728 22729 22730 22731 22732 22733 22734 22735 22736 22737 22738 22739 22740 22741 22742 22743 22744 22745 22746 22747 22748 22749 22750 22751 22752 22753 22754 22755 22756 22757 22758 22759 22760 . CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 13, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 25, 1998 TO WHOM ISSUED PURfU3E GOVERNMENT TRAINING SVC 2 BLDG. SEMINARS-PAZANDAK PATRICIA HELGESEN SEC 125 REIMB JAMES HURM SEC 125 REIMB/MILEAGE AT&T WIRELESS AIRTIME BRADLEY NIELSEN AIRFARE-PLANNING CONF. US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SHOREWOOD VLG MERCH ASSO< SPRING PROMOTION MIDTOWN HOTEL CONF. LODGING-B. NIELSEN DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING BEER PURCHASES MARLIN'S TRUCKING FREIGHT US POSTMASTER APRIL NEWSLETTER POSTAGE US POSTMASTER 1 ST QTR U/B POSTAGE PERA APRIL PERA LIFE INSURANCE ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCOMP CITY COUN1Y CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS PERA PERA MEDICA APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE HEAL THPARTNERS APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE LEAGUE OF MN CITIES APRIL DENTAL INSURANCE MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE APRIL DISABILITY UNUM LIFE INSURANCE APRIL LIFE INSURANCE AFSCME COUNCIL 14 APRIL DELTA DENTAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD ANCHOR PAPER NEWSLEITER PAPER KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB HENN. CO TREASURER ASSESSOR'S DATA JAMES HURM ROTARY MAKE UP BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB BRADLEY NIELSEN MILEAGE & EXPENSES NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB DANIEL RANDALL SEC 125 REIMB CITY OF TONKA BAY APRIL RENT-TB UQ US WEST COMMUNICATION/ADVERTISING WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE REMOVAL GRIFFIN COMPANIES APRIL RENT-L1Q I PAUSTIS WINE CO. WINE PURCHASE QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS UQUORIWINE PURCHASE VOID VOID TOWLE REAL ESTATE CO APRIL RENT-L1Q II AMOUNT $60.00 949.46 677.94 119.40 377.50 869.84 150.00 406.63 462.25 176.00 553.85 489.74 45.00 1,373.07 929.00 3,005.50 5,223.75 3,188.06 587.02 90.00 89.60 224.00 1,335.65 113.91 192.30 203.00 14.00 56.00 255.94 2,732.77 44.53 20.40 200.00 1,000.00 1,317.65 221.08 7,618.50 481 .1 0 655.85 0.00 1,375.89 Page 1 . . . 'i! CKNO 22761 22762 22763 22764 22765 22766 22767 22768 22769 22770 22771 22772 22773 22774 22775 22776 22777 22778 22779 22780 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 13,1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 25, 1998 TO WHOM ISSUED PETTY CASH MN STATE TREASURER NORTHERN STATES POWER US WEST BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING DAY DISTRIBUTING GTE DIRECTORIES GRIGGS, COOPER & CO JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO LAKE REGION VENDING LEEF BROS. MARK VII MARLIN'S TRUCKING NORTH STAR ICE PAUSTIS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS THORPE DISTRIBUTING PURfU3E PW FUEL 1 ST QTR BLDG. PERMIT SIC UTILITIES COMMUNICATION LIQUOR PURCHASE MISc/SUPPL Y PURCHASE BEER PURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE ADVERTISING LIO/WINE/BEER/MISC PURCHASE L1QUORiWINE/BEER PURCHASE MISC PURCHASE MATS BEER/MISC PURCHASE FREIGHT MISC PURCHASE WINE/BEER PURCHASE L1QUORiWINE PURCHASE UQUORiWINEPURCHASE BEER/MISC PURCHASE TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED Page 2 AMOUNT $100.00 654.52 2,130.15 218.16 6,530.30 512.33 719.25 9,227.60 56.85 11,731.94 13,508.14 1,914.96 26.20 4,545.45 111 .40 141.00 291.00 9,860.46 3,198.77 24,440.45 CITY OF SHORE WOOD CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APR. 13. 1998 COUNCIL MTG r "CKW VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT 22/81 ADAM"S PEST CONTROL. INC PEST CONTROL ,"lUN BLDG ----- ------------------------- ------------------------ -------- ----------- 60.1l 22/82 BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIP MAINT CI'TY GAR 22/83 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT SNOW & I 256.05 981 . 5~. 22184 CHAMPION AUTO STORE W344 FUEL CITY GAR 12.01 SUPPLIES CITY GAR 30.32 *** TOTAL FOR CHAMPION AUTO STORE 42.33 22785 CLASSIFIEDS LEO AD GEN GOVT 22786 COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM REPLACED TRAFFIC LIGHTS TRAP CON .278l COORDINATED BUSINESS SYST TONER GEN GOVT 22188 CROSSTOWN-OCS, INC. COFFEE MUN SLOG 22189 CROWN MARKING STAMP-OFFICE SUPPLIES GEN GOVT 22790 D & G SIGN & LABEL SUPPLIES CITY GAR ?2791 DALE GREEN CO ROADSIDE REPAIRS STREETS 22792 E-Z RECYCLING INC. MARCH RECYCLING CONTRACT RECYCLIN 22'l93 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT CONTAINER f=<ENTAL \I.JATER DE FUEL CITY GAR SUPPLIES PLANNING UN I F ORt'lS CITY GAR REFLECTIVE TAPE -------- 22194 FINA FLEET FUELING e?7Q" -, ,.::;. FRANKLIN QUEST 22796 G & K SERVICES 2279l GLOBAL EQUIPMENT 3l.00 lS'l . 36 162..58 101. S>l 36.58 2.5.l8 l??30 4.920.00 60.00 311.5? 29.34 348..5l 1?3.29 ANNUAL S/A ASSESS PROC GEN GOVT ll.90 ANNUAL s/r~ ASSESS PROC WATER DE 229.35 ANNUAL S/A ASSESS PROC SEI....JER DE l02.50 ANNUAL S/A PROCESSING RECYCLIN 196.50 ANNUAL S/A PROCESSING -------- lll.00 FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TF-~EA 6.5l.2.5 22198 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER *:tc:tc TOTAL . CI T Y GAR CITY GAR 45.9.5 22?99 HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY SUPPLIES EQUIP MAINT *** TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPAN 22800 INTERSTATE BATTERY INC EQUIP MAINT CITY GAR 22801 LARKIN, HOFFMAN. DALY... JOHNSON LEGAL PROF SER 22802 LIGHTNING LEGAL COURIER COURIER SERVICE ENGINEER 22803 OFFICE DEPOT fJFF ICE SL~PPLIES GO"'!T Page 3 30.86 15.09 l25..56 27.00 1/.00 1 ~2 .:) ,.S';~3 CITY OF SHORE WOOD CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APR. 13. 1998 COUNCIL MTG r "Cf<.tl= 'v'ENDOR NAi"IE DESCRIPTION DEPT. ----- ------------------------- ------------------------ -------- ----------- AMOUNT 22804 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER 22805 MINNESOTADEPT OF HEALTH 1ST QTR CONN FEE 22806 MN SUN PUBLICATIONS COUNCIL VACANCY/LEO AD 22807 MINNEGASCO . *:liC:liC TOTAL 22808 MINNETONKA-CITY OF 22809 MOUND-CITY OF ?2Bl0 WM. MUELLER & SONS. INC. 22811 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES FOR t'llNNEGASCO P\I.} TRAINING 2ND QTR FIRE PROTECTION SAND CAMERA 22812 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE PK SUPPLIES EQUIP MAINT :tc:tc:tc TOTAL FOR NAVARRE TRUE VALUE .2813 ORONO. CITY OF 22814 ORR.SCHELEN.MAYERON/ASSOC ;te;CC;fC TOTAL 22815 PITNEY-BOWES INC. 22816 POMMER COMPANY. INC. 22817 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 22818 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT ~2819 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 22820 SIGN SOURCE 22821 SUPERAMERICA FEB-MAR ANIMAL CONTROL JAN-FEB ENG REBILL JAN-FEB GEN ENG JAN-FEB WATER ENG JAN-FEB STRAWBERRY ENG JAN-FEB SHADY ISL BRG EN BLDR/BADGER ENG JAN-FEB JAN-FEB SMITHTOWN ENG FOR ORR.SCHELEN.MAYERON/ OFFICE SUPPLIES PLAQUES-MCCARTY/WEHLE SHOP SUPPLIES TOOLS EQUIP MAINT TRAIL SIGNAGE (2) FUEL Pa e 4 CI TY GAR' \1.,If:lT ER DE GEN GOVT '/'JA T ER DE I.....'ATEF< DE LIQUOR I/'JATER DE CI TY GAF-~ PARKS & f1UN SLOG LIQUOR LIQUOR 1..414.48 FIRE PRO SNOI/'J & I 8.63 1..34S.00 434.8.5 97.l2 331.40 189.17 106.55 321..83 64.38 1?4.16 68.22 61.0.5 120.40 1.954.50 S98.36 106.95 PARKS & 4?3l CITY GAR 31.08 l8.45 PROT INS 2.691.62 -------- 286.44 -------- 390.89 WATER DE 3.572.95 -------- 124.00 -------- 482.79 -------- 87.00 -------- 1.476.16 6.420.23 GEN GOVT 48.10 COUNCIL 101.80 CLfY GAR 163.98 CITY GAR 13'l.53 CITY GAR 4.60 PARKS & 905.25 CITY GAR 248.46 [:1"f'( [IF SriCtf':'~Ei,I..J()OC' CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR A~~_ 13. 1998 COUNCIL MTG CHECKtl= VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT 22822 fIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC COUNCIL MTG MINUTES GEN GOVT 201.JS PLANNING COMM MINUTES PLANNING 1.10.75 *** TOTAL FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITE 312.50 22823 TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUPP EQUIP MAINT CI TY Gr';R 44.3/ 22824 TSP/EOS SR CTP BOND ISSUES 3()",i' .. ~:.)~2 22825 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO_ EQUIP MAINT CI TY Gr::lH 61.2:::. 22826 US POSTAL SEHVICE POSTAGE FOR MACHINE GEN GO 'v' T 1 ('.f.....lt~..1 ,.........., ... ..... v v .. .~...... ??8?7 US POSTMASTER .:~l:~ I/.) .I,A},. GF~r';.lf'-.jGEP. BULK MAIL PERMIT RENEWAL GEN GOVT 1 ../ {'o. {"I {", I 'J ... ,."...... If'.le SLOG MAINT CITY GAR 143.22 *** TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL 2)' Of t'18f~) ....f)'.::' *** TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 155,495.06 . C:i'-!i::.C:}<, ! y;u)t: (~Cir"! cei!""! C:(Jj"i c:Cir"'l COi"! c:C) f"! C~Cli."! C:()f."l CUi"! C:(Ji"l COi"! C;CJr"'l Ceij....j cur"! em'! . C[,j'''l COf"l cor"l cm''! [:or"1 -. COf"1 cm"! COi"l cor'! cm"l cor"] CO,"1 COr-i COr-l COI"l COi"l cm"l COi"l COI"l COM COl"1 COM C' t"l E. c:: :.<. [) r::~ .l' j:: ~, 51 9~3 '" 5,1 qq ,., :.5.1 t.? ~3 ", 5.1 f:~8 '::: ':;'!..L t~";8 -:~~ ~5 .1 (:'1 8 "::1 ~!.l t:-:;g ", 5.1 '::li:;i ", 3.1 !9 ~3 .::,. ~',l.. ~:.'tS .::.' .51 !:":}S ;;! '::"..L ~?8 .:;, 2:tl t98 .:;, :;'..L '::.'t5 _. ~5.1 SiB _. ~,l ".:'x ~I 3l 1;..'8 _. 3!l ":.':;8 .~. ~5l 9~3 ~! ~! J. ";.1;:'''' ~ 2:,1 '::.i~3 ~l 3,.1 S';~3 '-, 31 98 3 31 t..~8 3 31 SiB .::; 31 98 3 31 98 3 31 '98 3 :5l 98 ,3 3l 98 3 31 98 3 31 98 3 31 98 3 31 98 3 31 98 3 31 .98 3 31 98 l~. r": __ I }\'. h: _ l:i ~ ,.' .... t....~ i::!'''!l..jL r"~ :~-1 r"1 I:: ....-. .....,...... l...t..,t:L-;--..... i..,.~ LJ f"l;3 E h: '. '. ... . ~... .... ~''o r',{ L.! r"j b ;:: t....~ 1t:)':":-) f:: i"I I 1_ '.l C; .2l28l~:.i ...'o .~ .... ... '. , ,... i:: ;..~ ~I I '( r':~ .ll() c.~ () f".i r...{ lEt) _~ f..~AS .;. \f~h~ 2l~282CI .115 LAWRENC:E A~ BR~jWN 2l.282.1 525 ANGELA M~ COi_E 2l2~3~2~2 500 C}~ARLES S_4 DAY,IS ":;., ":~Q":.:' .;~. ....:-......-'-'.......- l )'.::. .J f:;f"! r::. :.5 C:,. .-" .~ ..- -.. '. . .... i:: :._~ 1"" ..t r"~ ~::: 2l.2~3~Z~1 l.lf:.~() T i,l"i 1 L;:~ r~ ~ (;~h:(JLi T ".,... .'......_,....... ..t....L L. 0 ...'~ ,J 1.1 f:.';() K f;:~ T !~1 J_ E E j",{ :~ ,. . . ,~., ..... .... ..... .' ~-; r..: !::,:i::: ~'O:: ! ....... ................ .t:..L.L.b....(.t..~ .1t.1-Ct() ~~f;; T f~ I r~ I !:;~ R,. t-;;:: j_ G; E :3 E. f".i 2.12t5:~ )' 1 I.l.1() ,'.. .. " . ,.. ..~ .. i"'; ~~..:: !"f i:: ,_ r~ ,_I '" HELi._.1 ;'.'~l; ...,... ,...,..,........... ...:::. .J... .,,:: (:\ .;:;:~ ;::; It.l2:,() r::.EI_L'Y j'''I... , .......,...,........... t"'ft::.r"~ ll::~t::.:> 2l:.28"2~j 1.::."!.S() .J ~==:i"1E S C.. HJJF~fYl I:,~ 1 ':.:' ~:~''::, (Ot ._............._._..~ .16(),l 8RIAi~ Ct.. 2.128~51 ..J f~ }"'" C. t_ 1675 GROS ~cLICIC ~2 ~l ~2 ~3 ;5'2 1100 JEFFREY A~ JENSEN 2.128~~~~~! 1800 DENNIS D~ JOHNSON .......... ....,......... ... .L.l..L~..::~(-~. 2100 WILLIAM F... JOSEPHSON 2.128~.-:' 2495 MOLLY D" LA.r~j'ERNER 2l~18 :5t~ 2500 SUSANM~ LAT'!'ERNER ........ ,............... LJ.L:~':;' l 2800 JOSEPH p~ LUGOWSKl ~.2 .12 ~3 ~:!?3 2805 JASON R... LUND ~Zl28:::'!'~.) 2900 RUSSELL R... MARRON 2l~2b.4() 3000 THERESA L" NAAB L.128t:ll 3100 LAWRENCE A. NICCUM 2l28,:l~Z 3400 BRADLEY J... NIELSEN 2l281.l3 ~~+~~ ANDREW C... Or.fEN 212844 3500 JOSEPH E.. PAZANDAK 212845 3580 CHRlS'i'OPHER J~ POUNDER 212846 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 212847 3800 ALAN J~ ROLEK 212848 3815 MICHAEL J. RUFfENACH 212849 3850 TANYA M. SCHIERMAN 212850 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 212851 4050 BERNARD J. SCHNURR 212852 4200 BRENDA L. - Sf''ll TH 212853 4575 REBECCA A. TARVIN 212854 4750 RALPH A. WEHLE 212855 COi"iPUTEF-~ CHECKS MAi''1UAL CHECKS NOTICES OF DEPOSIT *:v:**rOTALS***;;< Page 6 .... ,. ..... ~'..., .. t.,.?ii='......i'\ f;i....jC~Lif...{ T ..... .... .~ ...)t..~ ~ I.)...L ."'~' ........ ':;!c.:::!..~!..l.. .l....:!.L_L.. )' ~5 ..~ ,..... ~. ..... '::: .~.l "..:) L. ..... ro. ........ l b'~:! .. '"'1,1 l 1:+ () '4 ::;,/::. ......... .... ... .:;t":;',...L ...1.)..,';, 6 )" !:';I ... (J.S 523.61 .S ~5 .::1 ,. 1.+ 6 226..lt:'f 1l21..';() 2l'9.22 1 /.l() .. 6() "'.0 "" .....:10... ..'.....fl.) ';;19.62 62t~.. 7.S .S~.2 ....s:::! 66~l.. "7.5 88,;+.. ':f() '!..,() l .18 32.35 633M22 ll51.34 9()Ll .. <,,'J'() 6?3.. 3..:'+ 11l6.ll 888.46 940.03 llSO.63 235.92 l16.36 618.59 153.l2 8:7.85 191.32 6l1.44 71 'I" n Qt.:) .-.-.,-:)...,..".. .00 .00 21l50.99