The URL can be used to link to this page

030998 CC Reg AgP \ " ~:rrC\" '~ CITY OF SBOREWOOD CITY COl:.lNCIL REGULAR MEETING MOND^ Y,MARCB 9, 1998 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg_ Stover McCarty == O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda C. Resolution of Appreciation (Att.-#l C Proposed Resolution) D. Introduction of Southshore Center Director Joyce Flury E. Introduction of Cub Scouts from Den 1, Pack 428 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23,1998 (Att.-#2 Minutes) 3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A Motion to Authorize the Purchase of a Toro Groundsmaster Lawn Tractor (Att.-#3 Engineer's Memorandum) 4 . MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.) 5 . PARKS - Report by Representative Review of Joint Park Commission I Council Work Session & Open Forum Meeting (Att.-#5 Draft Minutes) .~ B. A Motion to. Adopt a Resolution Making Appointments to the Park Foundation (Att.-#5B Proposed Resolution) A. 6 . PLANNING - Report by' Representative 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING A REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHTING (Att.-#7 Planner's Memorandum) Applicant: . Neighborhood Petition Location: Glen Road and County Road 19 8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON WILTSEY LANE (Att.-#8 Petition & Engineer's Memorandum) .. (9Hr'UV) SWIYI3 .!IO 'lVAOlIddV 0.1. .L3atHfls .NlIilorav .91 (uoptnuamrooa q~~~I# -.UV) ~~llW!PlO reun.uv ~tp.Ol stlOplU~!SUO;) lUQUIpU~ JOUO!SSD:>SKI S.LlIOdD 'lI3Nil03AJJt>1I lIOAV'W .SI l~'BW I~UUos.I~d uollod~"H s ,~~tn,iug . g gU!lOl!UOW lu~mdof~A~UO ll~"H.wnS .V S.LlIOd:!llI .!IiIY.LS 11 1I0.LVlI.LSINIWav .t1 (f'BSodOld lu~md!nbg EI#-.nv) SlI~awVB;) 'l1;)N!l03 m.t NI' saOVlIDd.!l 'lVilSIA I OIOllV DNIOlIVD31I NOLLOW V .!IO NOI.LVlIamSN03 .EI (uo!l~lI7fl ~~U'BU!plO ijU1Q Zl#-.UV) A3noa lIUV.M. V 9NmsnHV.LS3NOI.L1l'lOS31I V <INV a3IAlIaS 1jJ aSil lIUVM . E06 NOLL33S DNIONaKV 3;)NVNlCllIO NVNO 9N1lIWH 3nWld V RSI'1UV.LS:!I 0.1. NOIJ..OW V .!IO. NO:LLVlIaOISN03 .t I (T.Ilt\pUlUOm~w S,l~~tn,iUg lI#-'llY) :!INV'lAlIlI:!IHM.VlI.LS NO S.LWWUOlIdWl SSil3SIO O.L 8661'(1 nlIdV 'AVONOW - UVO NOI.LVWlIOiINI 3I'lWld V 9N1RSI1JaYJ..S:!INOLLOWV .!IO NOI.LVlI:!I6ISN03 oIl (f'Bsodold tfl mnpU'Blom~:w s,1~~U!8ug 01#-'UV) NV'ld J..N:!IW'JIDVNV"W lIUYAt\.W80.LS V .!IO NOI.LVlIVdDd lIO.!I gSA:\ ilO 'lVSOd08d m.t DNlUa;);)V NOI.LOW Y .!IO NOI.LVlIa<DSN03 .01 (mnpU'B.Iom~WJJms6fl:""uy) lI:!ISWaK'lI3N1l0:l .!IO .LN3W:!I:JV'ldR lIO.!I IDIllO'.!l:lOlld 9N1m1V9:!1l1 NOLLOWV .!IO NOIJ..VlIaOISN03 . 6 Z .!IO t :!I9'\1'd 8661 '6 H31IVW . VON:!IDV 'lI3Nll03A.:LIiJ t. ..:~ 4l!" '. ;,."'~ r . \I~ ~ 'I' . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 Executive Summary Shorewood City Council Meeting Monday, March 9,1998 Agenda Item #1C: This resolution is offering appreciation to Harold Dircks for over 9 years of service to the City in producing and cable casting our Council meetings. Agenda Item #lD: JoAnn Kvem will be attending the meeting with new Southshore Center Director Joyce Flury to introduce her to the City Council. Agenda Item #lE: Cub Scout Den 1, Pack 428 will be attending the meeting and can be introduced during this portion of the meeting. . Agenda Item #3: This motion authorizes the purchase of a Toro Groundmaster Lawn Tractor as approved in Capital Improvement budget. Agenda Item #5B: This resolution makes appointments to the Shore wood Park Foundation. The Park Commission recommends Chuck Cochran join Ken Dallman on the Foundation. The other names are recommended by the Foundation or the specific associations. Agenda Item #7: At the 23 February Council meeting there was confusion regarding the notice which was sent out for the above-referenced street light request. Staff reviewed the mailing list against the 500' radius map and found that all property owners within 500 feet had been notified. The reason there appear to be too few Glen Road addresses i~ that the Lake Fellowship Church, for example, owns three lots. Notice was sent to the owner o( the Shorewodd.Place apartments and the notice was posted near the mailboxes for all of the residents to view. Agenda Item #8: Several property owners have petitioned the City to asphalt Wiltsey Lane. A memorandum in the packet from the City Engineer discusses the issue. Agenda Item #9: The material in the packet recommends a schedule for interviews and appointment of a Council member to replace Councilmember McCarty. Please review the material and give directions to staff. Agenda Item #10: This motion accepts the proposal of WSB Engineering for preparation of our Stormwater Management Plan totaling $90,000. Agenda Item #11: This motion would establish the date and time for an open forum for Strawberry Lane residents for the proposed street improvement for 6:30 p.m., Monday, April 13 (before the City Council meeting). The Council might want to consider starting that at least one half hour earlier or asking staff to be here by 6:00 p.m. One half hour window of time for residents to come to an open forum does not seem like enough time. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore - Executive Summary of March 9, 1998 Council Meeting Page 2 Agenda Item # 12: Council may wish to consider this as an introduction and first reading of the ordinance amending the water ordinance and policy. The Council should by motion establish a public hearing on the ordinance. Although a hearing is not required, this ordinance would require one in the future, therefore, we suggest a hearing be set for Monday, April 13 at 7:30 p.m. This would allow us to publish an article in the April newsletter about the ordinance and the hearing. Agenda Item #13: The action here is a motion authorizing audio I visual upgrades in the Council chambers as proposed by Minnetonka Sound and Lighting as proposed. The Capital Improvement budget authorizes up to $22,000 for this project. - ~ . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION HONORING HAROLD DIRCKS WHEREAS, Harold Dircks pioneered in cable casting city council meetings in the Lake Minnetonka area by being the first and only producer of cable casts of the Shorewood City Council meetings since January, 1989; and WHEREAS, Harold Dircks accepted the formidable challenge of video taping council meetings for subsequent local cable access television broadcast with limited equipment; and WHEREAS, Harold Dircks has been very reliable in setting up well before each meeting, has an excellent attendance record and has provided excellent video composition during his tenure with the City of Shorewood; and WHEREAS, Harold Dircks has submitted his resignation to this position effective March, 1998. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council, on behalf of the citizens of Shorewood, offers its appreciation to Harold Dircks for over nine years of dedicated service to the City of Shorewood. ADOPTED by the City of Shorewood this 9th day of March, 1998. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR tf/~ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. 1. MINUTES CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:01p.m. A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Dahlberg; Councilrnembers McCarty (arrived at 7:03 p.m.), O'Neill and Garfunkel; Administrator Hurm; City Attorney John Dean (arrived at 7:03 p.m.); Engineer Brown; Planning Director Nielsen Councilmember Stover Absent: B . Review Agenda There was Council consensus to approve the agenda as submitted. C . Presentation of Plaques to Commission Members Mayor Dahlberg announced plaques will be mailed to Planning Commissioner Pisula for fIve years of service on the Commission and to Parks Commissioner Wilson for eight years of service on the Commission. He expressed his appreciation to Commissioners Pisula and Wilson for their contributions to the City. Councilrnember McCarty and City Attorney Dean arrived at 7:03 p.m. Mayor Dahlberg presented Planning Commissioner Foust with a plague of appreciation for four years of service on the Commission. He thanked Commissioner Foust for his dedication to the City. 2. APPROV AL OF MINUTES A . City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes - February 2, 1998 The City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes for February 2, 1998, were approved as submitted by Council consensus. B . City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - February 9, 1998 Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes for February 9, 1998, amended on Page 4, Paragraph 5, Line 2 by removing "regardless of scientific facts" and replacing it with "in the face 0 f scientific controversy". Motion passed 3/0. (Councilmember McCarty abstained.) 1F~ CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 2 C . City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes - February 9, 1998 Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes for February 9, 1998, as submitted. Motion passed 3/0. (Councilmember McCarty abstained.) 3. CONSENT AGENDA McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded approving the Motions on the Consent Agenda and adopting the Resolution therein: A. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-013, "A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Special Home Occupation". Applicant: James Bruce Location: 5755 Merry Lane A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-014, "A Resolution Denying a Conditional Use Permit for Special Home Occupation". Applicant: Sondra Traylor Location: 23115 Summit A venue B. C. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-015, "A Resolution Authorizing the City to Apply for 1998 Recycling Grant and Execution of Contract". D . A Motion to Approve Extension of a Deadline Regarding Notice to Remove. Appellant: Robert Stevenson Location: 5455 Valleywood Circle Motion passed 4/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 5 . PARK - Report by Representative A. Report by Commissioner Dallman on February 18 and 19, 1998 Park Commission Meetings Commissioner Dallman reported on the matters considered and actions taken by the Park Commission at their meeting of February 18 and 19, 1998 '(as detailed in the minutes of that meeting) . B . Consideration of a Motion to Accept a Gift of a Scoreboard for Freeman Field #3 From Lyman Lumber Company Commissioner Dallman reported Lyman Lumber has offered to donate the cost of purchase and installation of an electronic scoreboard for Freeman Field #3. It will be positioned as to present as small a silhouette as possible to the neighbors on the other side of the park. The scoreboard will be controlled from the home team dugout. Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded to accept the gift of an electronic scoreboard for Freeman Field #3 from Lyman Lumber. Motion passed 4/0. .. . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 3 Mayor Dahlberg expressed the City's appreciation to Lyman Lumber for the gift of the scoreboard. Councilmember McCarty clarified there will be no advertising on the scoreboard. C . Consideration of a Motion Approving Little League Plans to Improve Safety at Freeman Field #3 and to Adjust its Parking Lot Commissioner Dallman reported the Tonka Little League will pay for the improvements which includes bull pen areas near the dug outs and a safer area near the batting cage for teams to warm up. The proposal would include some expense on the part of the City, including moving the current ballards to the north and moving the three rows of parking further to the north (approximately 12 to 15 feet). Hurm reported the City's cost for these improvements is estimated to be approximately $2,500 to $3,000. O'Neill moved, McCarty seconded approving Little League plans to improve safety at Freeman Field #3 and to adjust its parking lot. Motion passed 4/0. 6. PLANNING - Report by Representative . Commissioner Kolstad reported on February 17, 1998 meeting of the Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting). A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation Applicant: Location: Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc. 23505 Smithtown Road . McCarty moved, Garfunkel seconded approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation for Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc., 23505 Smithtown Road. Motion passed 4/0. Dennis Pipkom noted that Page 3, Item f. refers to the installation of a six-foot high fence along the east side of the site. He stated there had been discussion that a fence would only be required on the east side of the lot from the north end of an existing building on the adjacent property to the north lot line. Also on Page 3, Item g. it had been discussed that storage could occur closer than the setback on the east side of the lot as it would be screened. Nielsen concurred that it had been agreed that storage could occur up to the fence as this was a commercial property which would be screened in this area. There also had been discussion that the commercial building to the east would screen this property and that the fence would extend from the north edge of that building to the setback line. Dahlberg moved, McCarty seconded to reconsider the Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation for Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc., 23505 Smith town Road. Motion passed 4/0. Nielsen suggested Item g. be amended that after the word "property" insert ", except for the east side of the property" and Item f. be amended that after the word "construct" insert "a foot long," and add a sentence "In the event that the building on the adjacent property to the east is destroyed or removed the fence would be extended to the rear setback line." CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 4 Councilmember Garfunkel stated this should be looked at as a standalone project. If a fence is required, a fence is required. Councilmember O'Neill stated he agreed. The owner of the adjacent property or it's use could change. He felt it was difficult to tie the placement of the fence to someone else's property. Mayor Dahlberg asked the amount of expense involved with extending the fence the entire property line. Mr. Pipkorn stated he had no idea. He was currently in the process of putting together the cost estimate. Mayor Dahlberg noted it was clear that the consensus of the Council was that the area should be screened. It is the discretion on the part of the City to stipulate what is adequate screening. Dahlberg moved, McCarty seconded to continue consideration of the Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation for Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc., 23505 Smithtown Road to the March 9, 1998 Council meeting for Staff to determine the correct verbiage and what screening is adequate. Motion passed 4/0. . B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Final Plan of Water's Edge P.U.D. Applicant: Bill Blegens Location: 20295 Manor Road Mayor Dahlberg reported he had contacted residents in this neighborhood and they seemed anxious that they were not notified of the changes in this final plan. He asked if the neighbors should have been notified and if the developer was within his time limit. Nielsen stated that notification was not required for final plan approval and the modifications to the plan do not warrant a new notice. Mr. Blegens has requested the appropriate extensions and is within his time limit. Mayor Dahlberg asked if this item should be tabled to allow for notification to the affected six property owners. Councilmember McCarty noted that Mayor Dahlberg had spoken with four of the six affected property owners. City Attorney Dean stated that there is no legal requirement of notification in this case. Hurm suggested Staff could send a memorandum to the affected property owners explaining what will be occurring at the site. McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-016, "A Resolution Approving the Final Plan and Final Plat of Water's Edge P. U .D." Motion passed 4/0. . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 5 C. A Motion to Adopt a Ordinance Establishing an Interim Moratorium Regarding Communication Facilities McCarty moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting ORDINANCE NO. 331, "An Interim Ordinance Regulating Transmission and Reception Facilities 0 f Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Services; Establishing a Moratorium, and Directing a Study be Conducted Thereon." Motion passed 4/0. 7. CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS REGARDING 1998-2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A . A Motion to Adopt the 1998 - 2002 Capital Improvement Program . Hurm explained that the Council has held a number of work sessions over the past six-month period to develop the 1998-2002 Capital Improvement Program. It includes recommendations of the Park Commission and has been reviewed by the Planning Commission for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. It was also included in the Budget Hearing in December of 1997. McCarty moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting the 1998 - 2002 Capital Improvement Program. Motion passed 4/0. B . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the 1998 Capital Budget Hurm noted the 1998 Capital Budget resolution is included on Page 28 of the Capital Improvement Program. Dahlberg moved, McCarty seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-017, "A Resolution Approving the 1998 Capital Budget." Motion passed 4/0. 8. CONSIDERA TION OF A MOTION REGARDING A REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHTING Applicant: Neighborhood Petition Location: Glen Road and County Road 19 . Councilmember Garfunkel noted he had not received any information on this issue prior to the Council meeting. O'Neill moved, McCarty seconded to continue a Request for Street Lighting for Glen Road and County Road 19 to the March 9, 1998 Council meeting, to allow concerns from the neighborhood to be voiced. Nielsen reported that all property owners within 500 feet of the area had been notified ten days prior to this meeting. The Staff report had been mailed to Councilmembers on February 20, 1998. Counci1member O'Neill stated he would vote in favor of this request if he was certain that this is what the neighbors want. He noted this was not published in the newsletter and he felt there had not been enough time given for residents to voice their concerns. Motion passed 4/0. Hurm stated Staff would place random calls to neighbors not represented on the petition. There was Council direction to Staff to notify each individual tenant of the apartment building located across the street from this request. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 6 9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 1300 Hurm explained the current Animal hnpound Fees are quite high compared to other cities and have been reduced to $25.00 for the first offense and $50.00 for any offense thereafter. As recommended by the Park Commission, the Picnic Pavilion Resident Base Fee for Manor, Badger and Cathcart will remain at $25.00 and the Non-Resident Base Fee will be $50.00. Brown explained that the water meter charges were previously not included in the Ordinance and this has caused confusion. City policy is to charge the customer cost plus the shipping fee. The City Code Book is normally $75.00 per copy but is now also available on CD Rom for $25.00 per copy. Spring Clean-up Fees are also included in this Ordinance. These costs are acquired from the vendors. McCarty moved, Garfunkel seconded adopting ORDINANCE NO. 332, "An Amendment to Chapter 1300 - Fees." Motion passed 4/0. 10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH WSB Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-018, "A Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. " Motion passed 4/0. 11. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT - BADGER WELL BUILDING Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-019, "A Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report and Construction Documents for the Badger Well Building and Associated Improvements." Motion passed 4/0. 12. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS Nielsen noted that at the February 9, 1998 Council meeting concerns had been raised in regard. to violations of the Tree Protection Ordinance at the Watten Ponds Development. Just prior to that meeting the City Building Inspector had cited the builder for numerous violations including dirt being piled over the tree protection fence and up onto trees near the excavation. Between the citing and the February 9 Council meeting the excavator drove down off the main driveway and through the woods to get to the other side of the building. On February 11, 1998, the City stopped work on the project for seven days and photographs were taken on February 12, 1998. The builder was asked for a corrective plan for the potential damage caused at the site. The builder provided a report from Kunde & Associates which reviewed the site, estimated the damage and made suggestions. The report suggested that there was not much damage as the frost had protected the roots of the smaller trees. The City then hired Steve Cook, Certified Forester, to examine the report. He had a number of recommendations and met with the Building Inspector and the builder this morning. At the discretion of Staff, the builder was allowed to resume work at the site. He has poured a concrete wall for the garage and is utilizing small equipment to place the dirt that was against the trees as backfill to the garage wall. The Building Inspector and Mr. Cook are supervising this work. The violations to the Tree Ordinance are being turned over to the City prosecuting attorney to obtain his opinion for further action. . . CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 7 . Brown reported the Public Works Department has a crew out patching potholes. He advised anyone with concerns to leave a message on the Shoreline. Hurm reported that Hennepin County has made a decision to purchase new voting equipment. They are asking the City to agree to the general concept at this time. This equipment would allow all precincts to have the same type of equipment and would provide faster transfer of election results to the County. The impacts to the City will be: 1. The City will relinquish ownership of the three voting machines currently owned by the City; 2. The City will lease four new voting machines, one for each precinct; 3. Hennepin County will continue to provide election support as they have done in the past to all cities that are using the new equipment; and 4. The City would be required to pay an annual maintenance agreement on four machines opposed to three and a nominal amount for leasing the machines. There was Council consensus to agree to this general concept. Hurm noted there have been a number of complaints and problems with Precinct ill voting at Minnewashta SchooL Up until approximately six years ago, voting had been held at the Minnewashta Church. If the location of the polling place were to change, one possibility is the new Minnewashta Church facility. There was Council consensus to pursue a change in the polling location for Precinct ill. 13. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Dahlberg reported his attendance at a meeting of area mayors. The DNR was present to discuss the process of developing public access points on Lake Minnetonka. The goal is to provide 750 parking spaces on the lake. Councilmember McCarty submitted her resignation from her position as a Shorewood City Councilmember effective April 30, 1998. Mayor Dahlberg accepted the resignation and thanked Councilmember McCarty for her many years of service. Councilmember O'Neill asked what the City could do in regard to the total disregard and the Tree Preservation Ordinance violations at Watten Pond. . Attorney Dean noted several options including consulting with the City prosecuting attorney, retaining the bond or security monies which are part of the development agreement, and suing the developer for any expenses that are not covered by the security monies of the development agreement. He suggested this issue be discussed in Executive'Session. There was Council consensus to discuss this item in Executive Session on Wednesday, February 25, 1998. Councilmember O'Neill questioned the process of the sewer pipe restoration. Nielsen reported a letter has been sent to Jim Hofner of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District recommending that they retain the letter of credit for specific improvements and the City is requesting they make sure the restoration is completed. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 - PAGE 8 14. ADJOURNMENT McCarty moved, Garfunkel seconded adjourning the meeting at 8:53 p.m. subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Lorri Kopischke, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . . r !. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128 . www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works JlY . DATE: March 5, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion to Authorize Purchase of a Toro Groundsmaster Lawn Tractor Attachments 1 and 2 are quotes received for the Toro Groundsmaster that is to be replaced this year. The City has had many problems with this particular machine including repeated failures of safety mechanisms for the machine. Although these fail safe systems are tested at every use, these failures has been cause for a serious injury to a seasonal worker. The quotes received for the specified machine are as follows: . Su lier MTI Distributing Machine Price $ 1,4709.00 Rollover Protection . S stem $ 394.00 Erv's Lawn Mower Repair $ 455.00 Credit for Trade In ($ 3,450.00) ($ 2,950.00) Net Price + Tax $ 12,410.45 $ 15,445.00 $ 13,791.75 The expenditure, if approved, would be taken from the funds already set aside form the equipment replacement fund as part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The budget amount provided in the CIP is $18,009.00. Therefore, the quotes obtained are well within the budgeted amount. Based upon the machine specified, the low quote was received from MTI Distributing. MTI Distributing is known to be a responsible vendor within this industry. A HeSldential Community on Lake ,1;lir;netcnka's South Sh.]T'3 113 Mayor and City Council Toro Groundsmaster March 5, 1998 Page 2 of2 In addition to the purchase of the machine, it has been requested that the vendor supply 1 set of filters, 4 sets of blades (3 blades per set) and 1 PTO belt. Recommendations: It is recommended that a motion be approved for expenditure offunds to MTI Distributing Co. for a total amount of$12,742.45. J . . . . ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- .w. . . DISTRIBUTING CO. III Saturday, February 7,1998 Larry Brown City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 474-6191 Dear Larry: We are pleased to quote for you prices on the following equipment for 1998. ~ Quote Product Description 1 Toro Groundsmaster 325-0; 25h.p. Diesel 2WD traction unit, with 72" Guardian Recycler Cutting Deck, Deluxe Suspension Seat, Rear Weights, Wide Tires (23x10.5-12), and ServicelTech Manual. $14,709.00+Tx Add for 2-Post ROPS $ Add for High Lift Blades, TP85-6040x3 $ Add for Torque Team PTO Belt $ Add for Filter Kit ( All recommended service intervals to 400hrs.) $ 394.00+Tx 43. 17/Set 23.18+Tx 115.88+ Tx -1 Less Trade-in; 1991, GM322-D with 72" Deck, ($3,450.00) Add Applicable State Sales Tax Equipment will be setup, serviced and delivered to Shorewood by MTI and covered under Toro's 2-Year Standard Warranty. Please call (800-492-9352) if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, >2xASx+ Jon Almquist Commercial Turf Sales Consultant ~'-:CC ~;\':='i"',:"-:ir37 _i'I;r:l~S :-\,;-=;~- C'! .="/........,i"i ~f:- -.'- - - .. ~..-.- -'- ',,)''':'':'''':-:::- . - ,~ ,;=:;::, ,-;=: '~I' in',:;: :, \.~ I~=::: J I' ;1 ' i I...I{ ~11 FE8 18 199f ERV'S LAWN MOWER REPAIR By 7102 West Lake Street . St. Louis Park, MN 55426 . (612) 929-3238 Larry City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Tuesday, February 10, 1998 Dear Sir: The following is a quotation on Toro mowing equipment. 1 Toro GM 325; Diesel, 72" Recycler mower with 2WD traction unit, Deluxe Seat, Wide Traction Tires, Weights, Service Manual. Additional for 2- Post Rollover and Seat Belts $15,445.00 $455.00 -1 Trade-in of GM 322-D, 72" Deck, 1991 Less ($2,950.00) ** Add Sales Tax Set-up and delivery charge of $225.00. 2-Year Factory Warranty on Toro items. If I can help, please call. Sincerely, ~ ~:-~\ -- ";""'\,', - I \i , )i i I' l;! .Jj 4ttachmen[: ... .. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDA Y, FEBRUARY 18, 1998 MINUTES 1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAl\tlBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7: 30 P .lVl. DRAfT Chair Puzak called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. A. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Puzak; Commissioners Colopoulos, Bensman, Dallman, Arnst, Themig and Cochran; Administrator Jim Hurm; Engineer Larry Brown; Council Liaison McCarty Council Liaison McCarty left at 9:30 p.m., Commissioner Bensman left at 10:04 p.m. . B. REVIEW AGENDA Chair Puzak read the agenda for February 18, 1998. Hurm asked that ice rinks be added under Reports. The agenda was accepted with this addition. Chair Puzak went over the changes in the format. The time is now listed on the left of each agenda item, each attachment is a different color and the attachment number is now in the upper right corner. The Commissioners noted their approval of the changes to the agenda and the packet format. 2. APPROV At OF MINUTES A. Park Commission Minutes of January 28, 1998 Bensman moved, Colopoulos seconded to approve the minutes as amended: on Page 2, Paragraph 3, change Kroegler to Koegler. lVlotion passed 7/0. . 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR None 4. REPORTS A. STATUS OF SOCCER GRANT Administrator Hurm advised that we have not received anything official regarding the $10,000 grant. The only information he has received is the press release and a phone call. The City will be the grantee and will need to work out details. B. RESPONSE TO INOUIRIES Administrator Hurm stated that Marilyn Pike had called about the Hockey Association using Badger hockey rink the following from 6:00 to 8:45 p.m. Monday through Thursday. She feels neighborhood kids should be able to have more pick up games during these times. Engineer Brown commented that he had only one other complaint this season. and felt the season went well. '*5.. "~ PARK COl\tlMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1998 - PAGE 2 Administrator Hurm also commented that the picnic table had been removed from the Freeman woods as indicated on a Shoreline message. C. FEBRUARY 12 YOUTH OPEN FORUM Administrator Hurm handed out the Mission Statement for the South Lake Youth Coalition. Hurm stated that that only about two dozen people showed at the Youth Open Forum. There is no written report as of today. Hurm explained that the YMCA considers the community to be a "center" because of meeting areas such as churches, community centers, and schools which are scattered throughout the area. Hurm noted the Minnetonka School District has applied for a grant to help the community develop in this area. The South Lake Youth Coalition's mission is to identify activities for middle school age children. He encouraged Park Commission members to attend those meetings. D. PARK & TRAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Administrator Hurm reviewed the trail portion of the CIP. He pointed out that the CIP refers to a letter received by City from the Minnetonka School District Transportation Department encouraging the City to develop a trail system for school children. Commissioner Arnst asked for a copy of the . letter. E. RESCHEDULING OF MAY 26 PARK COMMISSION MEETING DATE Regular meeting was changed from May 26 to May 27. The Commission will not have a meeting March 24 unless the planning process would require it. F . ICE RINKS Engineer Brown stated the ice rinks were closed for the season on Friday, February 13, 1998. Engineer Brown informed the Commission of complaints he had received regarding the odor at Cathcart Park. He explained placement of the ice caused gases to be formed under the ice with a strong odor. Because of the thin ice and warm weather, and ordinate amount of odor or gas made it to the surface. Therefore, it was noticed by more residents. Other cities have experienced the same . problem 5. DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS ON CONSIBERATION OF SKATE PARK Chair Puzak questioned the Commission's next steps.with regard to this issue. I Commissioner Arnst stated that the Mighty Kids grant news release showed that three cities were awarded grants for skate parks. She suggested staff research what is happening in these cities. Commissioner Dallman suggested we wait and see the outcome of the park/trail forum. Chair Puzak suggested this item be tabled to the April 14 meeting and Matt Pike be invited. Commissioner Themig suggested that this should be on the work plan. Themig moved, Dallman seconded to table the skate park until April 14 Park Commission meeting and to invite Matt Pike. Motion passed 7/0. Administrator Hurm will show a video prior to the April 14 meeting (7:00 p.m.) on skateboard parks. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1998 - PAGE 3 6. REVIEW PARK FEES Administrator Hurm reviewed the fee schedule items relating to parks. There was discussion on charges to reserve the picnic shelters. Chair Puzak suggested reservations be made at the City Hall. Following discussion, Themig moved, Colopoulos seconded, recommended amending the park shelter reservation fees to be $25.00 residents, $50.00 non-residents for all parks. Motion passed 7/0. 7. CONTRACT FOR CONCESSION SERVICES FOR 1998 SEASON Administrator Hurm advised that as of today he has not received information from Community Services regarding the concession stand. 8. REVIEW 1998 WORK PLAN . Commissioner Themig asked if the Work Plan could be set up by month, showing what items are to be reviewed each month. Commissioner Arnst asked if the City will be going forward with plans to host a Park Festival. Hurm explained it is on the Council list of work session items. All agreed to remove it from the Commission 1998 Work Plan. Commissioner Colopoulos inquired about green space. It was determined that the Parkffrail Open Forum may provide information regarding green space. 9. PREPARE FOR FEBRUARY 19 OPEN FORUM Administrator Hurm stated that all preparations have been made for the meeting. 10. REVIEW STARTING TIME OF PARK COMMISSION MEETINGS . It was agreed that the starting time for the Park Commission meeting will remain at 7:30 p.m. 11. DISCUSSION ON LITTLE LEAGUE ITEMS A. Proposal For A Scoreboard At Freeman Field #3 John Walden of Lyman Lumber Company explained the company would like to donate and install a scoreboard at Freeman Field #3. South Tonka Little Le~oue approved the scoreboard. There would be no cost to the City, except if public works could help with the trenching. The scoreboard would be four feet in height and thirteen feet long, raised about eight feet off the ground. It will be blue background with white letters. It would say "South Tonka Little League, Donated by Lyman Lumber Company." The scorekeeping controls are removable and would be kept in the concession stand. The scoreboard would be in left center field and should be positioned so it does not back up to homes in Shorewood Oaks. Chair Puzak asked that Engineer Brown be the contact person with Lyman Lumber Company for the installation of the scoreboard. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1998 - PAGE 4 Colopoulos moved, Dallman seconded, to recommend acceptance of the offer by Lyman Lumber to donate a scoreboard for Freeman Park Field #3 per the specifications discussed earlier. Motion passed 7/0 Administrator Hurm will check on any sign regulations. Chair Puzak asked that Engineer Brown work with Lyman Lumber on placement. B . FOUL BALL PROBLEM AT FREEMAN FIELD # 2 Gordy Lindstrom on behalf of Little League suggested we work together to relocate Freeman Field #2. He went over Freeman Field, #2 existing problems: I. Foul balls in neighbors property 2. Pedestrian safety on road by right field, Field #3 is used by 11 and 12 year olds 3. Frost heaves under fence post 4. Drainage problem in center field 5. Infield needs to be sodded Benefits of relocation ofField #2: . 1. Homeplate at right field 2. Noise away from Shorewood Oaks 3. Closer to concession stand 4. Park more user friendly, spectators can watch both Field #2 and Field #3 5. Opportunity for bull pen areas and batting cages. Lindstrom said that the existing fence would stay in place, separating pedestrians from vehicles, which has created safety concerns. He said the fence could be 16' high to help with the foul ball problem. He noted they would like to work with the City on the drainage problem in center field and added Little League could provide volunteers for installation of the sod. Lindstrom noted the cost for fencing would be between $10,000 to $15,000 with no bull pens or dugouts Engineer Brown felt it would cost approximately $40,000 to correct all the problems listed above. A subcommittee of Commissioner Colopoulos, Chair Puzak, Gordy Lindstrom, Brian Pische, and . Dave Anderson was established to review the current problems, research solutions and report back to the Commission. . c. OTHER LITTLE LEAGUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS Lindstrom, Pische and Anderson stressed the necessity to ensure safe facilities on Field #3. Little League rules require a safe throwing area. A bull pen would help when another team is waiting to play the next game. It would prevent them from standing on the berm throwing the ball. Suggested improvements as indicated in the drawing attached to and made a part of these minutes could be funded by the Tonka Men's Club prior to the season. Lindstrom asked that the Commission consider changes to the parking lot and installation of a bull pen. Chair Puzak expressed concern for foul balls and asked if netting could be provided. Engineer Brown will work with Lindstrom to provide the best options for safety improvements. Dallman moved, Cochran seconded, to recommend approval of the changes as proposed to the parking lot at Freeman Field #3. Motion passed 7/0. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1998 - PAGE 5 12. CONSIDER SAMPLE SIZE FOR TRAIL/PARK TELEPHONE SURVEY Chair Puzak reported that he, Hurrn, Koegler, and two gentleman from Decision Resources met on February 17 to discuss costs. They felt a 300 sample size with more questions would be most appropriate. This was the consensus of the Commission. Decision Resources will formulate the questions and bring back to the Park Commission for review and approval. 13. RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO PARK FOUNDATION Commissioner Bensman left at this time. Colopoulos moved, Dallman seconded, to recommend appointment of Chuck Cochran to the Shorewood Park Foundation. This will go to City Council for their first meeting in March. Motion passed 6/0. 14. COMMISSIONER REPORTS . Commissioner Arnst asked if new business could be put back on the agenda. Commissioner Arnst asked if we could follow up on the County's request last year for the City to stripe streets at trail crossings. She felt this would provide more safety for pedestrians. Engineer Brown will check into the lega1lliability regarding this. He will report back at the next meeting. 15. ADJOURNMENT Colopoulos moved, Dallman seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 p.m. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Twila Grout . Parks Secretary SHOREWOOD "What Do We Want Our Community to Be and What is the Role of Parks and Trails?" SUMMARY VISIONING SESSION February 19, 1998 ,--., :-:- ' - :I~'i,~. ,I i..) 1111'\ lU:' II jU \\\P"_i~,' r-:- _- r- t.~; J ,A -~y INTRODUCTION The Shorewood Parks and Trails Visioning Session was held at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 19, 1998 at the Southshore Senior Center. Approximately 40 residents, landowners and interested people participated in the Visioning Session. Participants arranged themselves into 6 small groups. The process involved both individual participation as well as small and large group participation. OPENING EXERCISE - "Favorite Place" . The initial exercise asked participants to identify their favorite place in Shorewood. As individuals, they noted their response on separate cards then placed a colored dot on a map of Shorewood. The following is a tabulation of their responses. Gathering Places . Christmas Lake (2) . Silverwood Park (4) . Crescent Beach (1) . American Legion (2) . LRT Trails (12) . Freeman Park (8) . Catacart Park (1) DEFINITION EXERCISE-"What is this place?" . The following questions were asked of the participants: What is this place? What characteristics define Shorewood? What makes Shorewood "Shorewood"? The following verbatim responses were recorded on a flip chart from any and all that offered thetn: . Natural features and environment (trees, stores, protected wetlands) . Safe community . Residential character . Neighborhoods are small- good feel . Mix of country and city . Historical roots to lake . Geographic boundary meanders . No central gathering place . Large lot size (open space) . Insulated from Metro Area . Limited developable land . Reliance on neighboring communities . Lack of business community Shorewood Vision Session Summary Page 1 · Proximity and access to regional recreation resources · Slow pace to community · Growing pains with recent development · Growth is occurring around all sides of city · Lack of identity -leftovers from lake communities · No sidewalks VISIONING EXERCISE - What does this place want to be? In the Visioning Exercise the small groups were asked to identify, both individually and as a group, what characteristics comprise a vision for the future community of Shorewood? Each small group discussed their visions, arrived at five conclusions and presented their characteristics at the "Vision Wall" on half sheets of paper. Once on the wall, the characteristics were placed into groups of common characteristics. These groupings are listed below with a bulleted list of characteristics taken verbatim from the "Vision Wall." PARKS AND TRAILS Natural Resources . · Buried utilities · Trees · Underground utilities . Keep open space, wetlands, woods, etc. . Dark skies - clear . Progress without compromising country Park Improvements · Expand Freeman to Hwy 7 and east · Pocket parks (more in the neighborhoods) Trails and Accessibilitv · Co-existence of traffic and people · "Welcome" to bikes and walking · Street trails for access to LRT · Get in front of planning around LRT · More and safer trails · Improve the major thorough-fare (i.e. Smithtown, Eureka) · Pedestrian accessibility to community resources (school, park, lake) (sidewalks and trails) . Diverse Activities · Recreationally diverse opportunities · Recreation center with pools · More ice (indoors and outdoors) . More activities for youth (13-18) . Community youth/recreational center Golf Course · Subway under LRT - to keep trail on top · To municipal golf course Shorewood Vision Session Summary Page 2 . . Public Art and Gardens . Gardens in parks (flowers, veggies intergenerational project) . Public DL T/gardens OTHERS . Fire-pit in backyard (still legal) . Mixed housing (affordable and senior) . Life cycle housing . Tax stability . Merge with Excelsior (Tonka Bay?) . Look at Shore wood as part of Metro area CHARACTERISTICS EXERCISE - What characteristics will be the most important in realizing our collective vision for Shorewood? The objective of the characteristics exercise was to determine the importance of the characteristics that were identified. The characteristics identified at the visioning exercise were added to a list of characteristics assembled from previous discussions. Each of the small groups was asked to agree upon a ranking for each characteristic on the chart. Once a group had agreed on the ranking, one member from the group placed a dot on each characteristic in the box that correlates with the groups ranking. The chart summarizes the rankings of each group. Notes: Because several groups identified similar characteristics that were previously identified, there may be some redundancy in the chart. Some groups did not vote on all characteristics and some groups may have voted twice on some characteristics; therefore, not every characteristic will have an equal amount of votes. The shaded characteristics are those that appear to be the. most important characteristics as determined by the group. Shorewood Vision Session Summary Page 3 Shorewood Parks and Trails "What Do We Want Our Community To Be? What is the Role of Parks and Trails?" A Community that has: .... .... s:: s:: .... .5 <<l d ...... ... t: ... '0 >,0 0 ~ 00 ... c.. c.. ... <Ll E E <Ll 0 >...... ...... Z ~ Characteristics of Parks and Recreation in the Community Provide interpretive/educational recreation facilities 0 1 4 2 Better coordinated athletic programming (between churches, sports 1 1 4 1 organizations, etc.) More emphasis on competitive sports facilities and programming 1 3 1 2 More emphasis on non or self-programmed sports facilities 1 3 3 1 Provide additional tennis courts 0 1 2 3 Other: Recreational center 0 3 1 0 Other: Public art and gardens 3 3 3 0 Other: Country flavor 3 2 0 0 Other: Golf course 0 0 3 3 M:\SHORWOOD\V1SION1G.DOC Shorewood Vision Session Summary Page 4 ~. . Shorewood Community ~Ieeting Thursday, February 19, 1998 . Address . J J.J I J S~7 t) !r-RA""v~A,I /.N. di~ ""t (..1 t<~11. e..{ +- :J 73 </ 0 B ,<( <.J~. : ./.."1 <- C~'IL C~~ 5">',f: ~ J...v- L-15-A [Y)u.'R.:f iJ " .J:) 100 ..51t:vr LcLifi-L j~(~1~:~: ~~~,~~:~~;t"~~ 1\ f\. cl hr l'~ U("w..ows(4.' 5"\ ~S JV\(~l"~ Pl-... J).; bh (-L '-;P 1l4.J-I...l..jA. 13.;- 'kl. rt~i"'\1 ( T a.... 15~I1<;h (r't "2 d96t ..L i.- (q4t= , .': j(" I7(( ~ L~~lt~e1~'" f! , .,- l \ '. ( -;1,; - \ /11 r~ , IJjl L ,)W) tJ,t: C, jY/4-;J{' /.Ac-c L-.A~ 5i?o c{....-t?~rC;t- /!/J !. ; " i I'" I'l / J i-I' .,.'),., ~' f ( ! ~ ~ ;, r:. v" ,,.... ( . n ( -' .' I_.J i..7 '-'z.j~,\;'V"", (),.~.l.X.....-...- . - :) v .' \ \ r..... ~, ,'\ I ( f, / ~ 7'/-~ "/ )-~- L, 7~_ ,6)) 4- 7 '-I -7 '5"/ do- (/76 - i ;;<9 /t .. ,., Shorewood Community Meeting Thursday, February 19, 1998 Name Address Phone# tf? j) -'12-(." ...:JQ 7 71{..Q{ ~/ If' 7~-~~~~ tl . <./ t./~/?7(j I r 0- ,.17 t+~L( '~L~'6 t.(7y- 7o(p 4 ~~ ~t: r;' fr/~3 . - '-10 if /Uu~,-I!<lM.y 1/\ '-17 $L-f;6 :1 2-"" If /5 fVI '" ~ l! ~< I~ If ler f2Y (Y/J-fV 1~1frf?j4:,,'~r4t/ / dlcl'-67C.~~ . d6~Y~/~ ~j~~60~~ CITY OF SHORE WOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE SHOREWOOD PARK FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, per the directives of the Articles of Incorporation of the Shorewood Parks Foundation, the Shorewood City Council makes appointments to the Board of Directors for the Foundation; and WHEREAS, the Bylaws for the Foundation require that each Director be appointed for three years or until his or her successor shall have been appointed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that the Shorewood Park Foundation Board of Directors consists of the following individuals, and that the highlighted individual is hereby appointed with the term to take effect March 15, 1998 and shall expire as indicated herein: Term First Expires Organization ApJX>intee Appointed 3/15/00 American Legion Donald Kronberg 6/96 3/15/00 Minnetonka Youth Hockey Assoc. Don Aslesen 10/97 3/15/00 Rotary Club Don Kelly 3/95 . 3/15/00 Minnetonka Community Education Tad Shaw 7/94 3/15/00 At Large Gordon Lindstrom 7/94 3/15/99 Tonka Football Association Jim Wilson 5/96 3/15/99 South Shore Softball Scott Hanson 7/94 3/15/99 Senior Representative Robert Noren 5/96 3/15/99 Shore wood Park Commission Ken Dallman 7/94 3/15/99 At Large Bill Keeler 9/94 . Non- Voting, City Administrator Non- Voting, City Council member James C. Hurm 7/94 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 9th day of March, 1998. ATTEST: TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR '~~K. -.J ~.;/ ~ -t CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Borkon called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Borkon; Commissioners Champa, Lizee, Kolstad, Callies (arrived at 7:27 p.m.) and Collins; Administrator Hurm; Planning Director Nielsen; Council Liaison O'Neill Present: . Absent: Commissioner Bailey APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes - February 3, 1998 Lizee moved, Champa seconded approving the Planning Commission Minutes of February 3, 1998, as amended on Page 2, Paragraph 1, delete "between the two existing homes and;" and add at the end of the paragraph, "He also stated the small shed will be removed;" Page 3, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2, change to read "Brown felt the drainage situation;" Paragraph 2, change "engineer" to "engineering;" Page 5, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2, change "Champ" to "Champa;" Page 6, Item 8, Paragraph 3, add to the beginning of the paragraph, "Commissioner Champa requested the issue of PUD be moved up to the March work session;" Motion passed 5/0. . 1. REVIEW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Administrator Hurm was in attendance to address questions and concerns relative to the Capital Improvements Program. The Commission discussed the issue of street reclamation versus street reconstruction. Commissioner Champa felt the City should concentrate on bringing the current streets up to satisfactory condition via the reclamation process and address street reconstruction on a street by street basis in the future. Council Liaison O'Neill expressed concern there are no funds being put in a reserve account in the event the reclamation work is not successful and the roadways require reconstruction. In addition, the street fund is depleting over the upcoming years. Hurrn commented it is intended that sealcoating, asphalting and patching work will be utilized to bring some of the roadways which are now rated as two and three to a rating of five. H(P )- ~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 17, 1998 - PAGE 2 (Commissioner Callies arrived at 7:27 p.m.) Hurm also addressed the issue of stormwater management and noted aerial mapping is scheduled for this year and will be a predictor of what will happen in future years. 2. DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - LAND USE Planning Director Nielsen addressed the Land Use section of the Comprehensive Plan. With respect to Planned Unit Developments, he noted it is not the intention of the Council to eliminate PUDs, but to retain the use of PUD as a tool. Council Liaison O'Neill believes it is the intent of the Council to de-emphasize the use of Planned Unit Development as a goal, but not eliminate this tool. With respect to zoning, where discrepancies exist between the Proposed Land Use Plan and the Zoning Map, the Council would favor whichever prescribes the lower density. . Chair Borkon requested a review of the Zoning and Land Use changes which have been made by the Council. It was noted there have been two previous work sessions held by the Council in which zoning and land use were discussed. Nielsen suggested if there are any changes which a commissioner takes exception to, this should be discussed and the Council made aware of any concerns there may be. Commissioner Kolstad felt there had been some significant changes made to Land Use. She noted one of the prior goals of the City was to attempt to minimize development costs and create higher density parcels to reduce the high sewer costs. This is not the philosophy of the current Council. Commissioner Kolstad also noted the prior direction was to work toward housing for different economic groups. The current philosophy is to let the market direct who lives in Shorewood. Commissioner Kolstad felt the goals of the City must be clearly outlined and restated in positive terms which will provide direction for the Commission on how to proceed. . Nielsen felt this must be put into the context that there is only 10 percent of the land in Shorewood open for development. In addition, with respect to affordability, the land use pattern is established and the market has dictated regardless of any efforts which were made by the City. Chair Borkon noted her agreement with Commissioner Kolstad. Nielsen stated he will return to the Commission with text changes for the Commission's review and discussion. Chair Borkon suggested the Commission review this matter with the text changes available for consideration at the March 17, 1998, work study session. 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Nielsen addressed the issue of communication facilities. Chair Borkon questioned how many sites the City will need to identify for this use. Nielsen stated his understanding there could possibly be twelve providers requesting a location within the city. Chair Borkon requested specific information on the number of sites per city of similar population and size and any other precedents which have been set or standards which have been devised. " ~.' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 17, 1998 - PAGE 3 Commissioner Kolstad felt it would be fair to the providers if sites were to be identified. one on the east and one on the west side of town. Commissioner Collins felt specific sites would not need to be identified, however the ordinance would be written in such a manner there would be specific areas which could be utilized for communication facilities, subject to certain requirements being met. Commissioner Callies felt it would be helpful if the City Attorney would provide sample ordinances for review and consideration. Nielsen suggested identifying commercial sites which would be acceptable and then writing an ordinance which includes zoning requirements which protect nearby residents. Hurm noted cities make substantial revenues from the antenna leases when city property is utilized. The revenues which are currently received from the existing leases are placed in the water fund. . Nielsen suggested the Commission begin with the C3 zoning district. He felt the NSP, Public Works and the area behind the American Legion would be appropriate sites. Nielsen noted the area of the shopping center would be appropriate along with a setback which would be equal to the size of the tower. He would not recommend utilizing the RC, C 1 or C2 districts. Nielsen noted the Public Works site is currently zoned residential. Chair Borkon felt this WOtttd may potentially be an appropriate site. Nielsen also suggested the golf course as a possibility. Since the golf course is privately owned, the City would not benefit financially from any potential lease. Chair Borkon inquired whether the owner of the golf course would have a choice on whether this is an approved site. Nielsen stated the owner would still have the option of whether he wants to lease the property or not. . Nielsen explained when drafting an ordinance, types of property will be identified in a particular district. He will return to the Commission on March 10, 1998, time permitting, with a draft ordinance for their review and consideration. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 5. REPORTS Planning Commission Meeting Schedule Commissioner Lizee suggested the March 31, 1998 study session be canceled given two commissioners will not be in attendance. Commissioner Champa was opposed to having only one meeting in April. Commissioner Kolstad suggested a sub committee be formed since there are issues which some Commissioners are more concerned about. She also felt the use of sub committees would speed up the process. Nielsen expressed concern with having sufficient time to prepare for the number of meetings which are being held during one week. ,.f .", PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 17, 1998 - PAGE 4 Commissioner Champa was in agreement with Commissioner Kolstad and felt this could be addressed without the need for Nielsen to attend the meeting. It was decided not to hold separate meetings given the needfor notice to be published and the burden it places on staff to prepare for additional meetings. Commissioner Callies felt the role of the Commission should be fulfilled within the scheduled meetings. The March 31, 1998 study session will remain tentatively scheduled with April 14, 1998 as an alternate date. The Commissioners were encouraged to continue to explore areas of special interest in order to bring additional information and insight forward. Reports Commissioner Kolstad reported members of the Council met with the people who live along the LRT. Their notes, as well as resident correspondence, was included in the Council packet and Commissioner Kolstad will provide this information to anyone wishing to review it. Commissioner Kolstad also reported on the notes she prepared for the Council meeting SUmmariZing. the previous meeting of the Planning Commission. Mayor Dahlberg had commented when Commission reports are presented to the Council, he would appreciate an executive summary similar to the one which Commissioner Kolstad had presented. Nielsen reported Joe pazandak inspected the Watten Ponds development site and the developer had already been cited relative to the issues which were raised at the Council meeting. An incident recently occurred on the site wherein an excavator drove through the wooded area to access the site rather than utilizing the driveway. Work on the site has been stopped for five days due to this incident. Staff has directed a correction plan must be submitted along with a forester's report assessing the damage in the area. Staff have questioned the forester's report and the City will have a forester review the situation on the site. Nielsen stated passive tree protection fencing will no longer be acceptable on this site and a fence with signage will need to be installed. . 6. ADJO~NT Commissioner Callies requested the following changes to the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 1998: Page 5, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2, change to read, "for this issue;" Sentence 3, delete "broad." Kolstad moved, Collins seconded approving the amendments of Commissioner Callies to the February 3, 1998 Minutes of the Planning Commission. Motion passed 6/0. Lizee moved, Champa seconded adjourning the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Cheryl WaIlat Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off-Site Secretarial, Inc. Note: Corrections to minutes by the Planning Commission are shown as italics for additions and strikeouts for deletions. , CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1998 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Borkon called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Borkon; Commissioners Champa, Lizee, Kolstad, Bailey, Callies (arrived at 7:05 p.m.) and Collins; Administrator Hurm; Planning Director Nielsen; Council Liaison O'Neill; City Attorney Ron Batty. . APPROV AL OF MINUTES Present: Planning Commission Minutes. February 17, 1998 . Lizee moved, Collins seconded approving the Planning Commission Minutes of February 17, 1998, as amended on Page 2, Item 2, Paragraph 4, Insert Sentence 2, "It was noted there have been two previous work sessions held by the Council in which zoning and land use were discussed." Page 2, Item 3, Paragraph 1, add "Chair Borkon requested specific information on the number of sites per city of similar population and size and any other precedents which have been set or standards which have been devised." Page 3, Paragraph 6, Sentence 2, change "would be an appropriate site," to "may potentially be an appropriate site." Item 5, Paragraph 2, add Sentence 2, "She also felt the use of sub committees would speed up the process." Page 4, Paragraph 1, add "It was decided not to hold separate meetings given the need for notice to be published and the burden it places on staff to prepare for additional meetings." Paragraph 2, "The commissioners were encouraged to continue to explore areas of special interest in order to bring additional information and insight forward." Motion passed 7/0. . 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING VARIANCES Planning Director Nielsen discussed the issue of variances. Attorney Batty addressed the criteria relative to variances, in addition to the issues of precedent and use variances. Attorney Batty stated he is a strict constructionist relative to variances. He commented it is his belief variances should be a rare exception and rather than granting a series of variances, an ordinance amendment should be considered. Attorney Batty discussed the statute and the issue of hardship. He stated reasonable use, as defined by the courts, is determined based upon whether the use the property owner intends to make of the property is reasonable and the circumstances present are not self-created. ~Cp . PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1998 . PAGE 2 Attorney Batty stated the discussion of variances comes down to the issue of undue hardship. One aspect of undue hardship has to do with the issue of reasonable use. He noted the courts have interpreted reasonable use to mean if what the property owner wants to do with the property is reasonable, then a variance is justified. Another aspect in determining undue hardship would be that the circumstances were not self created. For example, if a piece of property is purchased with the knowledge that a variance is going to be necessary to develop the property, this would not be considered a self created hardship. He noted successors in title stand in the same position of previous owners and inherit the good as well as the bad. Attorney Batty noted this to be a change on the part of the courts who have said in the past, when you purchase a property knowing a variance is going to be necessary, this would be considered a self created hardship. Commissioner Callies noted this was not a change in the statute, but is a judicial opinion which is not controlling in terms of the City ordinances. Attorney Batty stated this is a Court of Appeals interpretation of that particular section of the statute. . Commissioner Callies commented in some cases, the Court will direct the Legislature to change a law and that has not happened in this case. Attorney Batty stated a self created hardship is not a situation in which you could buy a piece of property that you knew required a variance. To the degree that cities were not considering a variance request when a property was purchased with the property owner's knowledge that a variance would be necessary, this has changed the law. Attorney Batty explained the third element of undue hardship to be uniqueness to the property. He noted unique to be a very difficult standard. Attorney Batty stated he believe unique is not something which is district wide or city wide. If a problem or circumstance is widely distributed around the area, then either everyone is complying with it or the situation should be remedied by . amending the ordinance rather than relying on variances. Attorney Batty noted in determining undue hardship, all three elements must be present. He addressed case law on this issue as well, noting the courts are tolerant of the actions taken by cities relative to variances, either granting or ej,enying. The courts are fairly consistent in not substituting their judgment for that of the decision makers, but uphold their decisions unless it is clear the reasons cited were legally insufficient or not based on fact. The courts consider reasonableness and the reasonableness of the decision is based on the standards in the local ordinance rather than in the statute. Commissioner Bailey questioned whether the courts are tolerant of inconsistency in the application of variances. Attorney Batty explained the courts do not favor inconsistency. He stated in most cases precedent does not become an issue. Most situations contain varying factual differences. The courts are also tolerant of differences in time. Attorney Batty pointed out that from a policy standpoint, precedent does become an issue. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24,1998 - PAGE 3 With respect to use variances, Nielsen explained there have been occasions in which property owners have requested a use variance to allow them an accessory use of a property which does not have a primary residence. Attorney Batty stated the statute prohibits granting, through the variance mechanism, the ability to put a use on a piece of property which is not allowed by the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Champa felt a property owner should be able to use their property for accessory use without the necessity of a primary residence on the property. He stated his belief a variance is a tool which should be used as such. . Nielsen stated a variance is a tool which allows more flexibility. He suggested if a garage on a piece of property is considered a reasonable use, rather than granting a variance, it would be more appropriate to change the ordinance, making this a permitted use in a residential district. Commissioner Champa stated this may be a reasonable use of one property and not of another. Nielsen stated in that event, a conditional use permit would be appropriate. He stated it would be a more appropriate tool than a variance. Commissioner Callies noted her agreement, stating she feels a variance should be an exception rather than the rule. Commissioner Champa commented in the past, when requests have come in for variances, the Commission has studied those requests on an individual basis and made efforts to direct the applicant toward a conditional use permit as opposed to a variance. . Attorney Batty explained a reasonable use would be a practice or a standard which is developed and accepted by a community. Chair Borkon asked whether the interpretation of reasonable use could be developed city by city. Attorney Batty felt it to very much be a community standard, however, if a particular request consistently comes in from various members of a community, perhaps the ordinance should be reviewed and amended. Commissioner Kolstad asked whether there is a halfway point between the traditional and modern views with respect to reasonable use. Chair Borkon added that there are times when reasonable use can be inconsistent with the ordinance. Commissioner Collins felt a variance should be used for an exception when nothing else will work. Nielsen noted this to be a criteria which the City has used in the past. Attorney Batty stated the problem also needs to be related to the property and not the individual. Commissioner Callies asked whether it is necessary to have consensus on all of these issues. She commented that reasonable may be different to everyone and the value of debate is lost if the Commission expects consensus on this issue. Commissioner Champa stated he would not expect consensus, however, he felt the current discussion gives each commissioner a better chance to understand each other as commissioners. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24,1998 - PAGE 4 Chair Borkon referenced the letter of Glen Froberg dated November 3, 1987 and asked whether the granting of a variance is a three step process which the Commission can utilize and if a request does not meet one of the steps, would consideration have to be given to the remaining steps. Attorney Batty stated he disagrees with some points in the letter given the fact it was written ten years ago and there have been changes which have occurred. He stated it is important that two tests have to be met, undue hardship, and consistency with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, but to get to the hardship issue, there are elements which must be met. Attorney Batty felt all three elements would have to be met in order to find undue hardship. Nielsen asked if there is reason to go on to consider all three elements if the request being made does not meet the first element. Chair Borkon pointed out findings of fact must be established in the event the matter were to proceed to court so that the court would be able to discuss all of the facts which are revealed. . Attorney Batty felt it important to discuss all of the issues to allow the City to be able to articulate all of the reasons for denying a request. Commissioner Kolstad inquired at what point a precedent has been set. Attorney Batty explained a precedent is set if the facts are so close in time and similarity that there is no rational basis for making a distinction between two circumstances. Commissioner Champa expressed concern when requests for variances come in and the request does not meet the criteria, the Commission suggests reviewing the ordinance. He did not feel the ordinance should be changed based on the request of one person. Commissioner Champa felt it would be more appropriate to consider changing the ordinance after it has become necessary to grant three or four variances on a particular issue. Chair Borkon expressed concern the Commission has been given various tools to use, however, no one really wants the Commission to use them. She questioned why a variance is even available as a tool since the Commission is discouraged from utilizing it. Commissioner Champa felt it should be more difficult to change an ordinance. Commissioner Collins was in disagreement with Attorney Batty on the issue of precedent and felt a precedent could be set with the granting of one variance. Attorney Batty felt it to be more of a political issue as opposed to a legal issue, however, it does put pressure on the decision makers. He noted few cases are won or lost on the issue of precedent. Attorney Batty stated a single variance should not prompt a review and amendment of the ordinance. He views the variance process as a signal to the city as to what is happening out in the community. Variance requests must be carefully evaluated as to whether they are truly unusual and unique circumstances which can only be dealt with in a variance or whether they are . '..... . PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1998 - PAGE 5 a sign of a need for a change in the ordinance. When a common request continues to occur, this should indicate to the city there is a need to re-evaluate the ordinance. Chair Borkon commented on the literature which was contained in the packet and stated in the future she would like information on the author of the literature. She felt it would be helpful to know their background, their philosophy and to whom the literature was written. Commissioner Kolstad also requested the Commission be provided with summaries of case law on this issue. 2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None 3. REPORTS . Commissioner Lizee noted stop signs have not yet been posted at Marsh Pointe. She requested these be placed as soon as possible given the number of construction vehicles and open houses which attract increased traffic in the area. Commissioner Lizee reported she received a complaint relative to the lighting at Marsh Pointe. She noted the flood lights on the model home are on all night. Nielsen will investigate this matter. Commissioner Kolstad reported on the February 23, 1998 meeting of the City Council. Commissioner Kolstad felt the sign at the senior center is too bright. Commissioner Lizee asked whether the sign can be dimmed. Nielsen will investigate this. Commissioner Kolstad felt this should also be addressed in the ordinance. . 4. ADJOURNMENT Lizee moved, Callies seconded adjourning the meeting at 8:51 p.m. Motion passed 7/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Cheryl Wallat Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off-Site Secretarial, Inc. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0126' www.state.netlshorewood' cityhall@shOrewood.state.net MEMORANDU~l . TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen DATE: 5 March 1998 RE: Street Light Petition - Glen Rd./County Rd. 19 FILE NO. 405 (Street lights) At the 23 February Council meeting there was confusion regarding the notice which was sent out for the above-referenced street light request. Staff reviewed the mailing list against the 500' radius map and found that all property owners within 500 feet had been notified. The reason there appear to be too few Glen Road addresses is that the Lake Fellowship Church, for example owns three lots. Notice was sent to the owner of the Shorewood P~ace apartments and the notice was posted near the mailboxes for all of the residents to VIew. . If you have any questions relative to the notice or to the request itself, please call me prior to Monday night's meeting. cc: Jim Hurm Larry Brown Fred Dresser ~tFf j> o :;....'~..-:.:J,=,~j.::..=:>'c~=] i;::';)>:=- . . '-! CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474:0126. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM . TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works J~ FROM: DATE: March 5, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion Regarding a Petition for Improvements to Wiltsey Lane. Attachment 1 is a petition received by the Wiltsey Lane Neighborhood requesting improvement to the gravel roadway. Mr. Plantikow has been serving as spokesperson for the group and has stated the roadway has had a tremendous number of extremely deep potholes and has been a hazard during the last few weeks of warm weather. Residents along Wiltsey Lane are tired of driving on an aggregate roadway due. to the many potholes and constant mess anytime frost leaves the ground for the season, or during wet weather conditions. . The City has 3 such aggregate roadways. Maple Avenue, Enchanted Point, and WIltsey Lane. Under the current policies of the City, a developer platting property is required to construct a bituminous roadway at his or her expense. Undoubtedly, this expense is passed through to the consumer or buyer of the lots. Records indicate that the subdivision which created Wiltsey Lane is known as "Deerfield Addition" and was filed with the county in 1956. Although the City does not maintain a subdivision file for this property, it is certainly reasonable to assume that at the time the subdivision was created, a paved roadway may not have been required by the City. The City Council has recently performed a pavement inventory and has examined the costs of reconstructing streets, that for the most part were installed initially by the developers of the various subdivisions. As mentioned above, the consumer ultimately paid the price of the original installation. In this instance the purchasers of lots along WIltsey Lane paid for a gravel roadway in the initial purchase of their lots. *x ~.......; A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ,,. ." :0 Mayor and City Council Wiltsey Lane Petition March 5, 1998 Page 2 of2 The petition which has been received, contains 4 signatures of the 6 lots which abut Wiltsey Lane. Currently, 2 of the 6 lots are vacant. The petition received does meet the requirements of Minnesota State Statute 429 which requires thirty five percent of the affected property owners sign the petition which must be considered by the City Council. Staff is requesting direction from the City Council as to the. requested improvement. Since the original cost of a paved'roadway was not shared by the existing homeowners along Wiltsey Lane, the City Council has three options available to them regarding the improvement, as it relates to funding. 1. Accept the Petition and decline improvement for the roadway. 2. Accept the petition and have residents pay a portion of the improvement. 3. Accept the Petition and fund the improvement by the local roadway fund. . If the City Council believes that items 2 or 3 are potential solutions, then it is recommended that the petition be accepted by the City Council, and that City Engineer be directed to prepare a feasibility report to investigate the improvement and associated funding alternatives. Staffwill prepare a draft resolution for Monday night's meeting for the City Council's use, if deemed appropriate. . " Wiltsev Lane Neighborhood Shorewood, lVIN 55331 :--~-*---~..."-"..~--.;.... " ,:' "4 S~I = lI'li ,1/ II' :i.J1 I , /. !,.,.J i February 23, 1998 'il p.i . l8\, t_~_.._~....;....._~ __-:.......--:=....___-.. City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attention: Mr. Larry Brown Director of Public Works . Re: Reauest for information re2ardin2 pavine Wiltsey Lane Dear Mr. Brown: As we discussed, we are concerned over the condition of the gravel road known as Wiltsey Lane. This short stretch of unpaved road serves 5 or 6 residential lots. The neighbors are inconvenienced by the poor condition of the road and the City is faced with dealing with the maintenance issues involving an unpaved, gravel road. We are interested in learning more about what would be involved with upgrading Wiltsey Lane to a paved road, similar to nearly all of the other roads in Shorewood. As property owners, we are concerned about the costs that are associated with this type of paving project. . We do want to go on record with the appropriate city officials to express our concerns over the sloppy road conditions that we endure on a daily basis. At this point in time, however, our interest is informational only. Please provide the information necessary for us to better understand the process, as well as any related cost information. Thank you very much for your consideration and assistance. Sincerely, , / ~/A ~ A .~. /. ~,//~ '-, ..,/ -" /" ~?" "0' >/(~. -, " /' , /:, -.;,L-,~- /./ // ~ "/~.<./'- / ' ,r ./ .; / / //,' ,. ,-c...- ., l' / ' ,./-7/'/1 .d/L.:-----./-' " < .'/ />t t ?/ ~ / / / .' ,/ ./ If ,. / ,t . 'r' ..' -::,., . . 1/' l,.." '" ~'.; _I '" /X:' eJo/t/\Lr7' ~- ,,---> ~ . Information on this ne~ ~.. be directed to homas E. Pl~nti~ow, 295~'~iltSey Lane. Shorewood, MN 55331 (612) 470-8914. 4ttacJlment " :t .I. V ;; 1 ..) z '~ cp ~ "~ ~ !! '" '" ?S '" .. n 1lIIl~ Hio&:. r . IS : ;. .. .~ 1.1"- : ~ . . . :.: 0: -: - ~: ':: ~ ~ '4? - ~.fi\ :;'::~ %_- --- . 1.1. .:... J. " J< - ow ~ .,. J .. 1" 5 po \ lil = ~ .. ~ .. - .. !~ .. - :i ~ .. . .. .. ~ 8 _.._-=----~-\._----:-: .. .-------... -..-..------. I~.. .." ~ g ~.. .. ~~ 1:. ~- -- ~.?.,.,.{ !' 0, ,.-- , ~-:. ~"'.. .. ... o~- ;:~~ !jt:i c~.. ~~: l;ii _....:.z .,.,. ~H \.... i; ~;~ e ; i~ I t: ~ i.\ . =, - . - . .. :.~ " '- ,... ..: "'"..". ::: - Ji ~ w c . ~. -<;",,-"~"---"y:: '-'~~ ~ '~: ~ . . -;: , ~ : : ~" ~ _L I - ,.. ..... ~ ~ ., ." ?U o l- rn o -1 lJ\ -1 (Tl ~ ., ~. ~ -- ..-..-..-- ... ~ ~ Il' , . . .'1 , .' t': ..... 5 ~ /' - ... . ~ ~ . -- ~ ~l! . t . . To: From: Date: Re: Mayor and City Council James C. Hurm, City Administrator Teri Naab, Executive Secretary / Deputy Clerk March 3, 1998 Filling Vacancies on the City Council The following schedule for filling the Council vacancy is presented for your review and approval. Additional time has been allowed between the deadline to submit resumes and the interviews to allow Council to make a decision on final candidates to be interviewed should the number received be too large to consider all. Schedule: => Council reviews and approves the process at the meeting of March 9 => Press release on vacancy published on March 18 => Advertisement of vacancy published on March 25 => Newsletter article delivered April 1 => Deadline for acceptance of resumes or letters of interest April 9, noon => Interviews April 20 => Appointment April 27, effective May 1 Attached you will find copies of the press release and ad to be published for your review and approval. 1f~ . . .. Shorewood Briefs For Publication the week of March 16, 1998 SHOREWOOD EVENTS City Council Position Open The Shorewood City Council is currently accepting applications to fill a vacancy on the City Council due to the resignation of Council member Jennifer McCarty. The term of this position will be effective upon appointment and continue through December, 1998. If you are interested in this opportunity to serve your City, please send a letter of interest and a resume by April 9, 1998 at noon. to: City of Shorewood, 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331. For more information, call 474-3236. Press Contact: James C. Hurm, City Administrator 474-3236 3/12/98 Shorewood City Council Position Opening The Shorewood City Council is currently accepting applications to fill a vacancy on the City Council due to the resignation of Council member Jennifer McCarty. The term of this position will be effective upon appointment and continue through December, 1998. Interviews will be conducted by the City Council in early ApriL The Council meets on the second and fourth Monday evenings of each month for regular meetings, and the first and third Monday of each month for work sessions. Other meetings are necessary from time to time. If you are interested in this opportunity to serve your City, please send a letter of interest and a resume by April 9, 1998 at noon to: James C. Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 For more information, call 474-3236. To be published the week of March 25, 1998 in the Sun Sailor and in the April issue of the Citizen Informer. .. . . ~. CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD" SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927" (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474:0128 . www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator !.any Brown, Director of Public Works AV- J March 7, 1998 . FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion to Accept the Proposal byWSB and Associates, Inc. for Preparation of a Stormwater Management Plan . Mr. Peter Willenbring and Mr. Don Sterna of WSB and Associates, Inc. will be present during Monday nights City Council . meeting to review the proposal for preparation of the stormwater management policy, and to address any questions or concerns. '. Mr. Willenbring is known in the industry as a leader regarding stormwater management. He brings quite an array of talent and experience as a consultant in this field. Staff felt that this would also be a good opportunity to introduce Mr. Don Sterna to the City Council. Mr. Sterna will serve as the City's general project manager and client contact for WSB and Associates. Mr. Sterna also brings a wide variety of talents to Shorewood. While it is not the intent of this memo to summarize everything that is within the proposal, I will highlight some of the basic features such as cost and proposed content of the plan. Proposed Content: . A large number of the subsections of the proposal provided are mandated by state statute by requiring conformance to the overall stormwater management plans prepared by the . Watershed Districts which oversee stormwater management for the surrounding cities. Shorewood is contained within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff CreeleWatershed District. A brief summary of the services to be provided by this propoSal are as follows: .A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore #)() .,..... Mayor and City Council Proposal for Stormwater Management Page 2 of3 . Services Provided · Project Management · Data Collection · Conduct a Public Information Meeting and documentation · Provide hydraulic analysis of 3 5 sub-watersheds . Analysis for floodplain management · Shore land management maps and narrative · Provide an water quality model · Erosion and sedimentation control policies · Prepare a stormwater treatment and maintenance plan . · Add the National Wetlands Inventory to the City base map · Present financial options regarding storm water management · Provide preliminary discussion on the wellhead management program The above list demonstrates the complexity of managing stormwater as a system. Water quantity, quality, and rate all playa key roles in managing this system that impacts the entire city. Preparation of this plan is the first step in managing stormwater on a regional basis versus a site by site basis. . The subject proposal suggests analysis for 35 sub-watersheds. The stormwater management plan which was prepared in 1975 by a different consultant contained 16 sub-watersheds. While it is not the intent of this proposal to identify and solve every drainage problem within the City, the additional sub-watersheds will allow analysis of some of the larger issues that have a large impact to the City. Undoubtedly, the lowering of the outlet structure to the Waterford detention basin will be one such analysis. ." Fee Structure: Attachment 1 is the fee structure for this project. Very briefly, the fees structure is broken down as follows: Plan Analvsis and PreDaration Part 1 · Project Management . . Data Collection . Analysis of Data . Preparation and Submittal of Plan to Agencies Subtotal $ 5,000 $ 7,000 $ 13,000 $ 10,000 $ 35,000 Revisions Based on Agency Comment $ 5,000 (as needed - not to exceed) . Total $ 40,000 (project costs continued next page) . . . .. . Mayor and City Council Proposal for Stormwater Management Page 3 of3 Aerial Tooo2raohv Part 2 2 Foot contour mapping (Markhurd) Photo control survey for topography (WSB and Associates, Inc.) Total $ 31,860 $ 15,000 $ 46,860 Staff has worked with Mr. Willenbring and Mr. Sterna to reduce the total cost of the stormwater management plan under the $90,000 budgeted as provided for in the CIP. One addition to the services that will have to be added to this authorization, is the what is known as a permanent survey bench loop. This assigns permanent points of elevation to a specific location throughout the City. From these benchmarks, additional photo control can be established. At the time that staff was providing direction for WSB' s proposal, it was thought that there would be enough individual project surveys to "piece together" to establish this loop. Based upon additional research, it has been determined that a larger loop which encompasses the total City will be required. I hope to report to the City Council at Monday nights meeting as to the. additional dollars required to establish this benchmark loop. While approximately $3,000 dollars remains in the budget for preparation of the stormwater study that may be used for this system, additional dollars may be available through grant money received by the City for mapping purposes. I will provide further detail. at Mondays meeting. Also note that two foot contours have been suggested versus one foot contours. This was necessary since election to proceed with one foot contours would add ~pproximately $13,000 additional to the project which would place the project over budget. The preparation of stormwater. management plan is typically one of the larger projects a City undertakes. Staff has reviewed the proposal provided by WSB and Associates, Inc., and believes that the proposal provided will not only meet the many statutory requirements that the City must adhere to, but will also be a very useful tool in managing the stormwater runoff that impacts every part of Shorewood. Recommendations: Staff is recommending approval of the motion which accepts the proposal provided by WSB and Associates Inc. for the preparation of a stormwater management plan for the City of Shorewood,. - .- Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section IV . Estimated Cost/Billing Rates TASK DESCRlmON EsnMATEDCOST A. B. C. D. PROJECT MANAGEMENt" DATA COUEcnON INTERPRETATION OF WATER REsOURCE DATA S5000 S7000 $13,000 S10,000 PREPARE DRAFT F!lIlAL REPoRTIPRODUcr SUBMIT 1'0 AGENCIES LUMP SUM PROJECT COST E. REvISIONIPREPARATION OF FINAL PLAN (BILLED HoURLY - NOT TO ExCEED) I TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST NOT TO EXCEED I ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATES ESTIMATES TO PROVIDE 1 FOOT TOPO FO~\{ MARXHURD ESTIMATE TO PROVIDE 2 FEET TOPO FROM MARKHURD ESTIMATE TO PROVIDE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL AND SURVEY FROM WSB FOR MARKHURD Tapa The City shall pay the engineer a lump sum figure of$35,OOO for the completion of the "Final Draft Report" as defined in the Scope of Services. Fifty percent (50%) of this.lump sum fee shall be paid on submittal of the draft plan to the City for review. The remainder will be paid to the Engineer upon submission of the Final Draft Plan to the Watershed Districts for their review and comment. WSB & Associates will provide the ground survey control work required by Marlchurd to complete the aerial mapping work for the City. This work will include the establishment of horizontal and vertical control points throughout the City as directed by Markhurd. Horizontal control will be established using Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying methods, and will be completed within the required accuracy for the mapping work selected. Vertical control will be established by completing level loops from existing benchmarks within the City, and will also be completed within the prescribed accuracy necessary for Markhurd. The cost for the ground survey control assumes that existing benchmark records throughout the City will be provided to WSB & Associates before the start of the work. The City shall pay the Engineer for Basic Services rendered on an hourly basis. for all servi~es related to review agency comments of the final draft plan for a cost not to exceed 15,000. The Engineer shall be compensated monthly in conformance with the Engineer's current fee schedule as attached. .' City of Shor~ood · lVIlID' Resource Managmwrt Plan Estimat~ Cost . Section IV - Page I WSB Proposal No. 011.98 . Attachment to prepare a Water Resource Management Plan for the City of Shorewood, MN Submitted to: The City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 February 16, 1998 City Council Agenda Item 10 .....- 1. ,f ... WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 B.A. Mitre!steadt, P.E. Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Ronald B. Bray, P.E. & Associates, Inc. 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 February 17, 1998 Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 Dear Larry: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional engineering services to the City of Shorewood. We are very interested and extremely capable in assisting you with the preparation of your Local Water Resource Management Plan. We believe our firm possesses the following qualifications which make us the logical candidate to provide this consulting service to the City. . Unparalleled Water Resource Management Expertise and Experience WSB's project team members have been actively involved in the development of water resource management plans for over 16 years. They have worked on the preparation of such plans for almost a dozen watershed districts and water management organizations and for over 30 municipalities. . Non-Point Source Water Quality Management Expertise WSB's project principal has over 15 years of experience in non-point source runoff modeling and management. Our project team has been involved in several of the largest lake and non- point source pollution management projects to have taken place in Minnesota. . Some of these projects have received national recognition for excellence. This experience will enable us to provide the City with comprehensive direction concerning the development of cost-effective water quality management programs that will utilize not only the resources of your City, but the resources of other governmental units. . Wetlands Management Expertise WSB's project team members have worked closely with the Board of Water and Soil Resources in the development and implementation of the final rules regarding no net loss wetland management, as well as provided support and direction relative to recently-proposed rule changes. Appropriate wetland management requirements must be incorporated into your local plan. The project team has specific opinions and will provide positive direction in developing and implementing your wetland management plan. :.";:rpwr\tP.::r.f)?i)S,-tL'.~t ~:,'(:)7 '-::-.., ': _~4"" ,_.. -" '4." '-, '.';''''- " ~ - . Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood February 17, 1998 Page 2 · Intimate Knowledge of the Requirements of the Metropolitan Surfact! Water Management Act Our project team is thoroughly familiar with the laws governing water management organizations and more importantly, has intimate knowledge of the requirements for preparation of storm water management plans by municipalities. This intimate knowledge comes as the result of our project principal previously drafting the rules which govern the content of second generation plans for the Board of Soils and Water Resources. His involvement in this process will enable us to not only provide you with a plan that meets the requirements of the current legislation, but allow us to provide you with insight into the issues that may need to be addressed in future water resource management plans. · Commitment to Communication Our project team is committed to maintaining a high level of communication with city staff throughout this project, and will develop a plan that reflects this all-important aspect of plan development. As a result, we can assure you that the completed Water Resources Management Plan will be directly tailored to meet the City's needs, both now and in the future. In addition, as part of the planning process, public input into identifying water resource-related problems within the City will be an important task. Our commitment to communication will assure that the public will have an opportunity to provide input into the planning process. · Extensive Experience in Developing Programs to Equitably Fund and Finance a Wide Variety of Water Resources-Related Project Work WSB personnel have completed dozens of comprehensive storm water management plans, sanitary sewer and water plans, infrastructure management plans, and.hundreds offeasibility studies that address funding and financing projects. WSB's personnel have also served as expert witnesses for a number of matters in an effort to justify the reasonableness of various funding and financing formulas. Our personnel have extensive experience and hands-on knowledge relative to the implementation of the funding provisions provided for a wide variety of state laws and statutes. This experience enables us to help the City define and justify the most appropriate funding source and financing approach for its needs. · Ability to Provide Cost-Effective Watershed Management Planning Services WSB & Associates was formed and structured to provide experienced staff and high-quality engineering services in a low overhead environment. We believe this experience is reflected in the project manager we have identified for this project and in our proposed cost for the project. This allows us to provide you with engineering services that have real value. As outlined above, it is clear that WSB is in many ways uniquely qualified to provide engineering and technical services to the City of Shorewood. In addition to the above, WSB also utilizes a number of internal practices that ensure your projects will be completed on time and within budget. WSB's ":'.WPWIMPROPOSADOf 1.98102 {'9'_.b. "" t. .}' . ~ Mr. Larry Brown City of Shorewood February 17, 1998 Page 3 quality control procedures will ensure that your project will be completed in accordance with the highest engineering standards. The enclosed proposal contains an outline of a statement of understanding and the specific tasks and services we intend to provide the City, plus the schedule ,and cost associated with providing these services. It also provides additional infonnation on the background of the firm, resumes of our project team members, and brief descriptions of some projects that our team members have undertaken, which further exemplify our broad experience and capabilities in water resource management and plan development. We propose to complete the Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan for the lump sum cost of $35,000. This includes preparing and submitting the plan comments to the review agencies. Any required modifications to the plan based on agency review will be completed on an hourly basis at a "not to exceed" cost of$5,000. Therefore, the cost to complete the City of Shore wood Water Resource Management Plan will not exceed $40,000. WSB proposes to use the mapping firm ofMarkhurd to complete the aerial mapping work for the City of Shore wood. WSB will provide the necessary ground survey control work for Markhurd's mapping requirements. We propose to provide the ground survey control work on a cost not-to-exceed basis of$15,000. This cost assumes that the City will provide the benchmark records throughout the City prior to starting the ground survey. Markhurd's proposal for aerial mapping is included in this proposal for your review. Markhurd's proposal identifies the cost associated with providing both one- foot and two-foot contour maps, depending on which option is requested by the City. We look forward to your favorable consideration of our professional services and would welcome an opportunity to meet and further discuss our qualifications with you if you desire. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me or Pete Willenbring at 541-4800. ~ Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. jJ#~ ~w~ Peter R. Willenbring, P .E. Vice President Project Manager Donald W. Sterna, P.E. Vice President Project Principal nm F:'WPW1N\PROPOSALlOll.98lO11'97-10. wrxi City of Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Table of Contents Section I Statement of Understanding Section II Scope of Services Section III Project Schedule Section IV Estimated Cost Section V Project Team Section VI Experience Section VII Client References Section VIII Markhurd Section IX Resumes City ofShorewood . Water Resource Management Plan Table of Contents WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .... WSB .iiiiiiiiiiiiii .-... . I- ~ Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section I Statement of Understanding Based on previous discussions with members of the City staff, we have a perception of the City's needs relative to preparation of a Water Resource Management Plan. Our understanding of the City's specific needs is outlined below. . The City of Shorewood needs a Water Resource Management Plan covering all areas of the City to receive approval of the City's Comprehensive Plan. . Due to budgetary considerations and the fact that the City has active watershed districts administering many policies of this plan, the City intends to limit the cost for this effort. . Water quantity and quality are the primary focus of water resource-related management activities in the City. . The plan should focus on the implementation of Best Management Practices to address water quality goals, as the City is essentially fully developed and most capital improvements could be cost-prohibitive. . The plan must attempt to be consistent with the management plans that were prepared by the watersheds having jurisdiction in the area. The scope of work outlined herein has been developed to meet the needs of the City as we have listed above. The specific tasks/services to' be provided are described in the balance of this proposal. City of Shorewood - Water Resource Management Plan Statement of Understanding · Section 1 - Page 1 WSB Proposal No: 011.98 . JALS8 . ,,_be. Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan J- Section II Scope of Services A. Project Management To provide the City of Shorewood with positive assurance that the work effort associated with this project is clearly defined, staffed, budgeted and managed, a number of project management tasks are outlined below. These tasks will ensure that the project will run smoothly and that communication between WSB and the City will be clear and direct. 1) At the onset of the project, a meeting will be held, during which time appropriate members of the WSB's project team will meet with the City Staff to review the work plan. Preliminary dates for future progress update meetings will also be scheduled with the staff at this time. 2) To provide the City with further documentation concerning the status of the project, monthly project status reports will be prepared and submitted, along with monthly invoices. The status report will describe the work completed in the past month, outline any issues of concern that should be addressed, and review the anticipated work to be completed in the upcoming month. B. Data Collection This part of the work effort consists of gathering relevant water resource-related information for the City of Shorewood. It is understood this information is available at City Hall. A meeting must be held with the City staff to obtain this information. Water resource-related agreements that the City has entered into will also be obtained for inclusion in the local plan, as required by BWSR Rules. It is anticipated the following data will be collected: City of ShoreJf1ood · Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services · Section II - Page 1 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .. ~$8 "_be. ~ Any water resource-related agreements into which the City of Shorewood has entered. . . Maps showing the layout of the existing storm sewer system. . Applicable maps from the City of Shorewood. . FEMA's flood plain maps and Letter of Map Amendment, if applicable. . The comprehensive plan and policies for the watershed districts having jurisdiction in the City. . All other previous reports prepared regarding storm water management or water quality issues. . The City's comprehensive plan including land use mapping. . Topography mapping of the City. 1) Obtain Information From Other Agencies A letter and detailed checklist requesting water resource information for the City will be sent to each of the following agencies: · Hennepin County · USGS . Minnesota Department of Natural Resources . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · Fish and Wildlife Service . Minnehaha Creek Watershed District . Riley-Purgatory Watershed District This will be followed up with a telephone call to provide additional assurance that the agency representative completes a thorough search of their files for the requested information. City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management P14n Scope of Services · Section II - Page 2 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .. WS8 ..~k 2) Conduct Informational Meeting ~ In order to comply with the rules regarding public input in the planning process, a public informational meeting will need to be held. It is anticipated that the City will send out whatever public notices are desired for this meeting. The meeting will focus on gathering general information and information on specific issues or perceived problems within the City. 3) Prepare Data Collection Memorandum A data collection memorandum will be prepared identifying the collected data, along with a description of the information obtained. C. Interpretation of Water Resources Data Existing water resources data collected as part of the previous task will be reviewed and briefly summarized to provide the City with an indication of the present status and possible trends concerning water resources within the City of Shorewood. Detailed information will be provided by reference. Information that may be included as part of this review is broken down below for the categories listed: 1) Hydrologic & Hydraulic Information · Available hydraulic information on hydrologic characteristics of major watersheds will be reviewed. · Recommendations that have been made in other documents relative to various storm water management activities will be incorporated into this plan. · All areas within the City of Shorewood will be modeled using a TR 20-based hydrologic model. As part of this modeling effort, up to 35 subwatershed areas will be delineated and existing and proposed storm water retention and treatment facilities defined. A map will be provided showing the watershed delineations throughout the City in conformance with the model. Pertinent hydrologic information, including drainage area, time of City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services · Section II - Page 3 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... WSB tI~bIc. 'I. ~ concentration, curve number (based on land use), slope and percent of pervious and impervious areas within the watershed, storage required, and the stage-storage discharge relationship for each storage area will also be provided. Existing storm water runoff rates and flood elevations for the one and 1 OO-year return frequency critical duration event storms will be run and summarized in this report. 2) Flood Plain Management . A discussion of past floods in the City and the damage associated with these events will be provided, along with other pertinent information related to flood plain management. It is anticipated that the city records will provide us with information concerning past flood events. . A flood plain map in digital format will be developed. 3) ShorelandManagement . A digital map ofDNR-protected and non-protected waters will be incorporated, along with the NOHW for these waters. . . A narrative discussion outlining DNR shoreland zoning requirements, the areas regulated by the adoption of shoreland zoning ordinances, and the impacts of these regulations on development in the City will be provided. 4) Water Quality . Provide a review and brief summary of the water quality within the City. . Develop water quality policies in conformance with the requirements of the watershed plans. . Develop a P-8 water quality model covering all areas of the City. This model will estimate pollutant loadings from the subwatersheds developed in the hydrologic(hydraulic model. City of Shorewood . Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services · Section II - Page 4 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... WS8 ........./c . Provide recommendations for water quality improvements in the City. Recommendations will be in the form of both capital improvements and best management practices. 5) Erosion and Sedimentation Control . Develop erosion and sedimentation control policies for the City. . Identify existing and potential erosion and sedimentation control problem areas in the City. 6) Storm Water Treatment · Existing water bodies shall be classified to define their function for storm water treatment. The classification will be based on a water body's public use capability, the wildlife and aesthetic values of the wetland, and the downstream benefits the water body is providing in regard to treatment of storm water runoff. A proposed classification system shall be developed and submitted to the City of Shorewood staff for review and comment. Based on feedback, the classification system will be finalized. . Develop a storm water conveyance system maintenance plan to address inspection and maintenance of all City storm water facilities. 7) Wetlands . The Wetland Management Plan will be prepared to incorporate wetland protection policies . consistent with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and the policies of the watershed districts. . A map identifying the location of each wetland from the NWI or Public Waters Inventory will be incorporated into the document. City of Shorewood - Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services - Section II - Page 5 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... W$8 .-... ~ ~ . 8) Financing . Financial considerations must be addressed as part of the local plan development process. . Present financing options available to the City for funding storm water capital improvement, including discussion for implementing a storm water utility. 9) Wellhead Protection Plan . Provide direction to the City on the development of a well head protection plan. . The development of a well head protection plan will not be completed as part of this plan. D. Prepare Final Draft ReportlProduct The outline of the water resource plan will be as follows: 1) Purpose The local plan will have a section entitled "Purpose", which outlines the purposes of the water management programs required by Section 103B.205 through 103B.255. 2) Water Resource-Related Agreements Any appropriate water resource management-related agreements, which have been entered into by the local community, will. be outlined. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the local community has executed between itself and the watershed districts, adjoining communities, or private parties. Available information concerning these agreements, in general conformance with the content requirements of joint powers agreements for watershed districts outlined in Minnesota Rules Section 8410,0030, will be included. City of Shorewood . Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services · Section II. Page 6 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .. WS8 "~/1fC. 3) Executive Summary , The plan shall have a section entitled "Executive Summary", which generally summarizes the content of the local plan in a manner similar to that required for WMOplans under Section 8410.0050. The format for this "Summary" will be similar to the summary used in the City's comprehensive plan. 4) Land and Water Resource Inventory The plan will contain a composite land and water resource inventory containing all relevant data from WMO plans affecting it consistent with the data required by Minnesota Rules Section 8410.0060. 5) Establishment of Goals and Policies The local plan will state specific goals and corresponding policies related to the purpose of these plans, be consistent with the policies and goals of the watershed district plans within the City, and address the relation of the local plan to the regional, state and federal goals and programs outlined in Section 8410.0070. 6) Assessment of Problems The plan will contain a summary assessment of existing and/or potential water resource-related problems, including those identified in watershed district plans which affect the community. The problem assessment must be completed for only those areas within the corporate limits of the community and meet the same content requirements as that outlined for watershed district plans pursuant to Minnesota Rules Section. 841 0.0090, Subparts 1 and 2. 7) Corrective Actions The local plan will describe non-structural, programmatic and/or structural solutions to the problems identified in part 8410.0170, Subpart 6. The mandatory actions outlined in Minnesota Rules Section 8410.0100, Subparts 1 through 6 for watershed district plans, shall be considered except that such actions shall be limited to those that can be implemented City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Services · Section 11- Page 7 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 Ii.. ~$8 .~/1tC. at a local level. All corrective actions must be consistent with the watershed district plan having jurisdiction within the municipality or township. 8) FinancialConsideranons The local plans will contain a brief analysis of the financial impact of implementation of the proposed regulatory controls and programs identified pursuant to Part 8410.0170, Subpart 7. The analysis will include the following items. . The preliminary estimate of cost of adoption and enforcement of local controls and standards for the local municipality. . The estimated annual cost of implementation of other specified programs. . A discussion oflocal ability to fund adoption of and enforcement of local controls and standards, implementation of other specified programs, and capital improvements. 9) Implementanon Priorities The local plans will prioritize implementation components so as to make the best use of available local, funding and prevent future water management problems from occurring to the maximum practical extent. Local plans must prioritize watershed district plan implementation components in line with watershed district priorities as outlined pursuant to Part 8410.0120, but for only those implementation components that must be facilitated by the local municipality or township. , . 10) Amendment Procedures The local plan will contain a section entitled" Amendments to Plan", which contains the year the plan shall extend to and establish the process by which amendments may be made. City of Shorewood · Willer Resource Mtlnilgemenl Pliln Scope of Services · Section 11 - Pilge 8 WSB Proposill No. 011.98 ..... VYS8 ..~hc. Upon completion of the "Final Draft Report" that has been approved by staff and council, five copies of the draft report will be made and the report will be forwarded to the watersheds for their review and approval. Services provided in responding to comments from the watersheds will be billed at an hourly rate according to the attached Fee Schedule. Upon final approval of the plan by the watersheds, city staff and council, ten (10) copies of the plan will be made and provided to the City and review agencIes. City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Scope of Servrees · Section 11- Page 9 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... ~S8 .~I1tC. 7 ,~ Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section III Project Schedule * WORK TASK DESCRIPTION MONms FROM NOTICE TO PROCEED 1 APR 2 3 4 5 MAY JUNE JULY AUG 6 SEPT 7 8 9 ocr NOV DEe A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND PLAN REVIEW B. DATA COLLECTION C. INTERPRETATION OF WATER RESOURCE DATA D. FINAL REPORT/PRODUCT * Project schedule may be adjusted to accommodate the needs of the City. City of Shorewood . Water Resource Management PlIln Project Schedule . Section 111- Page 1 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section IV Estimated Cost/Billing Rates TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST A. B. e. D. PROJECT MANAGEMENT S5000 S7000 S13,ooO $10,000 DATA COLLECTION INTERPRETATION OF WATER REsoURCE DATA PREPARE DRAFT FINAL REPORTIPRODUCT SUBMIT TO AGENCIES LUMP SUM PROJECT COST $35,000 E. REVISION/PREPARATION OF FINAL PLAN (BaLED HOURLY. NOT TO EXCEED) $5,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATES ESTIMATES TO PROVIDE 1 FOOT TOPO FORM MARKHURD $44,860 ESTIMATE TO PROVIDE 2 FEET TOPO FROM MARKHURD $31,860 $15,000 ESTIMATE TO PROVIDE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL eONTROL AND SURVEY FROM WSB FOR MARKHURD TOPO f The City shall pay the engineer a lump sum figure of$35,000 for the completion of the "Final Draft Report" as defined in the Scope of Services. Fifty percent (50%) of this 1ump sum fee shall be paid on submittal of the draft plan to the City for review. The remainder will be paid to the Engineer upon submission of the Final Draft Plan to the Watershed Districts for their review and comment. WSB & Associates will provide the ground survey control work required by Markhurd to complete the aerial mapping work for the City. This work will include the establishment of horizontal and vertical control points throughout the City as directed by Markhurd. Horizontal control will be established using Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying methods, and will be completed within the required accuracy for the mapping work selected. Vertical control will be established by completing level loops from existing benchmarks within the City, and will also be completed within the prescribed accuracy necessary for Markhurd. The cost for the ground survey control assumes that existing benchmark records throughout the City will be provided to WSB & Associates before the start of the work. The City shall pay the Engineer for Basic Services rendered on an hourly basis, for all services related to review agency comments of the final draft plan for a cost not to exceed $5,000. The Engineer shall be compensated monthly in conformance with the Engineer's current fee schedule as attached. City 01 Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Estimated Cost · Section IV - Page 1 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .A W$8 ......... .... City of Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan V Project Team City of Shorewood Larry Brown, P .E. City Engineer Project Manager Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Vice President WSB & Associates, Inc. ~ WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzala Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 312-::41-180:: i{ Associates. f/le -:: ~ 'I ;;; J'" 0" ~,~ r< '" - -"~ ,- " - ==.>1,:;--::: ,.......-. ":; f Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section VI Experience WSB personnel have been involved in a wide range of virtually every aspect of water resource activities on both a watershed and local level. In an effort to keep this proposal reasonably concise, outlined below is an abbreviated listing of some of our representative experience in various water resource management areas for which we anticipate you have a concern. Storm Water Management Planning Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, Savage, MN Development of this plan included setting up a hydrologic model for the City to meet hydrologic and water quality concerns of its residents and to protect sensitive environmental resources. As part of this plan, a very detailed field investigation was completed for erosion control along the Credit River. This study included documentation with photos and a preliminary estimate to provide protection to each site. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Shako pee, MN Development of this plan included preliminarily designing storm water storage areas and outlet structures from an 8,000-acre drainage area to limit peak discharge rates to downstream areas, and completing a non-point source pollution control plan that met Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPDES water quality requirements for a point source storm water discharge to the Minnesota River. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Burnsville, MN The Bumsville Comprehensive Storm W ater Manage~ent Plan was the first local storm water management plan to be completed in full conformance with the plan content requirements outlined in Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 that were effective August 1, 1992. This plan was also reviewed by the State Board of Water & Soil Resources and received an excellent rating. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Brooklyn Park, MN This plan is one of the most recently completed storm water plans. The preparation of this plan incorporated the rate control and treatment requirements of two different watershed management organizations having jurisdiction in the City, and also reflected Metropolitan Council requirements for discharge to the Mississippi River. City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Experience · Section VI - Page 1 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ..... ftI(~8 A~1c Black Dog Lake Watershed Management Plan A comprehensive watershed management master plan was developed in conformance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act for the Black Dog Lake Watershed Management Commission. Mr. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E., was the project manager for this project. Existing data was collected from numerous sources for the 110 subwatersheds within the entire watershed and was analyzed for a 1 OO-yearrainfall event. The Black Dog Lake Watershed includes the Cities of Eagan, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Savage and Burnsville. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Maplewood, MN Development of this plan included meeting the requirements of four WMO's having jurisdiction within the City of Maple wood and addressing a wide range of water resource management issues facing the community, as required by the City and the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. Over 250 subwatersheds were modeled for storm water runoff rate control and treatment purposes. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Lilydale, MN A water quality management plan was developed for the City of Lilydale that will provide treatment for storm water runoff from all areas within the City of Lilydale to NURP standards when the plan is fully implemented. A non-point source pollution control plan was also completed that met with the water quality requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, Lauderdale, MN This storm water drainage study was prepared as a guide for improvement of the storm drainage system in the City of Lauderdale. Storm water runoff determinations were made based on rainfall records, soil type, surface topography of scope, and current or potential development patterns. Lauderdale was divided into identifiable drainage districts, with the proposed storm sewer following general existing drainage and street patterns. Water Quality Planning and Lake Restoration Mr. Willenbring and Mr. Hubmer have completed water quality management plans for numerous communities. These plans typically include modeling non-point source pollutant loadings and modeling in-lake water quality. They have also prepared water resource management plans for numerous watershed management organizations. Such plans responded to concerns related to water quantity, water quality and erosion control. Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan, Shakopee, MN A water quality management plan was developed for the City of Shakopee that will provide treatment for storm water runoff from all areas within the City of Shakopee to City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Experience . Section VI - Page 2 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ..... ftl(S8 .-"'" 1 NURP standards when the plan is fully implemented. As a result of the development of this plan, the City of Shakopee received the first NPDES permit for a municipal storm water discharge in the State of Minnesota. NPDES Permit Acquisition, Shakopee, MN WSB's water resources team leader prepared a water quality management plan for the City of Shakopee that received a NPDES permit for non-point source discharge to the Minnesota River. Lake Restoration Feasibility Report for Crystal Lake, Burnsville, MN A water quality manageme~t plan identifying watershed management measures, as well as in-lake treatment measures, was developed for the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization. The program was reviewed by MPCA, and grant funding from EP A was received through the Clean Lakes Grant Program. In-lake treatment consists of hypolimnetic withdrawal and alum treatment to improve and/or protect the quality of water in Crystal Lake, both now and in the future. Golden Lake Wetland Treatment System, Circle Pines, MN A wetland treatment system was designed to treat storm water runoff discharged to it from a 4,000-acre tributary drainage area. The design was reviewed, approved and funded by EP A through the Clean Lakes Grant Program. Wetland treatment system design developed to protect downstream water quality in Golden Lake. Long Lake Sediment Treatment Project, Rice Creek Watershed District This project consisted of utilizing liquid calcium nitrate to treat lake bottom sediments in Long Lake in New Brighton. Treatment was developed to reduce internal nutrient recycling within the lake basin. The project was reviewed, approved and funded through EP A Clean Lakes Grant Program. The project received the Consulting Engineer's Council Award for Excellence. This work was performed by Mr. Willenbring while employed with another consulting firm. Non-Point Source Runoff Analysis for Airport South District EIS, Bloomington, MN Non-point source water quality was modeled for the p;oposed Mega Mall development in the City of Bloomington as part of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project. Loadings for a wide range of pollutants were analyzed and treatment options were evaluated. This work was performed by Mr. Willenbring while employed with another consulting firm. City of Short!Wood · Water Resource Management Pllln Experience · Section VI - Page 3 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 . ~S8 .-."", Wetland Management Wetland Management Plan, Shakopee and Burnsville, MN As part of the ongoing water resource management services provided to these two communities, assistance was given each in various aspects relating to implementation of programs associated with meeting the interim wetland management guidelines, or developing a classification system for wetlands and water bodies within the community. Issues regarding the immediate need for the completion of a wetland inventory, the type of classification system to be used, and the wetland values to be considered as a result of any modification were addressed. Development of Wetland Policies, Black Dog WMO Our work with the Black Dog WMO involved developing a wetland management plan that would direct local municipalities and classify and manage wetlands in accordance with a local plan. Wetland and Water Resource Planning, Woodbury, MN Our work with the City ofW oodbury involved land use and public land use planning for an area of the City involving 3,250 acres and encompassing three lakes, a tamarack preserve and numerous wetland and storm water ponding sites. This work involved analysis of tamarack ecology, hydraulics and natural systems' management planning. A comprehensive park and trail and natural resource study was also completed for the City of Woodbury involving 23,000 acres, which incorporates storm waterponding facilities as a key consideration in park and open space planning, and natural and water resource preservation and management. Our planning and design experience has always emphasized the importance of working within the constraints and opportunities of tQ.e physical environment. This presupposes an understanding of physical, natural and social development factors. Wetland Evaluation and Management, Lone Lake Park, Minnetonka, MN Mr. Willenbring provided wetland evaluation and management services to facilitate a park layout that is sensitive to the impact of these natural areas~ yet affords a complete recreational experience. The existing site consisted of steep wooded slopes, wooded upland and wetland types 1 to 6. Mr. Willenbring performed these services while with another consulting firm. Veteran's Memorial Park (Formerly Legion Lake Park), Richfield, MN Design services to facilitate a major community park on 106 acres was provided to the City. This site is located east of Portland A venue and south of 62nd Crosstown Highway. Approximately one-half of the site was developed as a combination storm water ponding facility and wetland/wildlife area. City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Experience . Section VI - Page 4 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... ~S8 "_lie J Work With Rules and Ordinances Related to the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act Mr. Willenbring was recently involved in assisting the Board of Soil and Water Resources in the development of draft rules for the State of Minnesota regarding preparation of comprehensive storm water management plans in the seven-county metropolitan area. As part of this effort, an advisory committee made up of 50 representatives from over 50 federal, state, regional and local agencies, was assigned the task of providing input on a monthly basis over a one-year period to respond to various drafts of proposed rules governing storm water management. Now completed and adopted, these rules provide specific guidance for local communities and WMO's in the development of comprehensive storm water management plans. Flood Control Storm Sewer System Evaluation, Richfield, MN This project consisted of evaluating the storm sewer system in approximately 60 selected areas within the City of Richfield to determine the level of protection provided for structures within these selected areas. As part of the project, rainfall events having a return frequency of 1,5, 10,25,50 and 100 years were modeled. The rainfall event that actually occurred on July 20-23, 1987 was also modeled. Corresponding peak discharge rates and flood elevations were established. Recommendations were developed to provide the City with direction on the most cost-effective way to deal with the problems that were identified. The project also involved the development of a policy that the City can now follow in the future to address residents' concerns. Storm Sewer System Evaluation, Burnsville,MN A hydrologic analysis was conducted of approximately 15 areas within the City of Burnsville, which experienced flooding as a result of rainfall events in the summer of 1987. For each of the identified flood problem areas, the extent of the problem was analyzed hydrologically and recommendations were provided. A preliminary design for improvements, which could resolve the problem in tlie future, was also provided. City of Shorewood · Water Resource Management Plan Experience . Section VI- Page 5 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .. ~S8 ,,~htt:. Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section VII References City of Hugo 5524 Upper 146th Street North Hugo, MN 55038 (612) 429-6676 Mr. Robert Museus, City Administrator City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 (612) 869-7521 . Mr. Michael J. Eastling, P.E., City Engineer Mr. Don Fondrick, Community Development Director City of Savage 6000 McColl Drive Savage,MN 55378 (612) 882-2670 Mr. David E. Hutton, P.E., City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Shako pee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee,MN 55379 (612) 445-3650 Mr. Bruce Loney, P .E., City EngineerlPublic Works Director City of Circle Pines 200 Civic Heights Circle Circle Pines, MN 55014 (612) 784-5898 Mr. James Keinath, City Administrator City of ShoreH1Ood · Water Resource Management Pltm Client References . Section VII - Page 1 WSB Proposal No. 011.98 .A W:S8 .~.hft:. j Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section VIII Markhurd City ofShorewood · Water Resource Management PlIln Markhurd . Section VIII WSB Proposal No. 011.98 ... ItYS8 ........ be. .. /fIIAIIKHUR"TM EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 13400 68th AVENUE NORTH. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55311-3515 TELEPHONE: (612) 420-9606. FAX: (612) 420-9584 IN REPLY, REFER TO: E10215 February 15, 1998 Mr. Jon Lennander City of Shorewood c/o WSB & Associates, Inc. 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Blvd. Mpls, MN 55426 Re: Shorewood Mapping Project Dear Mr. Lennander: Weare pleased to present our cost and technical proposal for the entire City of Shorewood. Our proposal is structured by listing the scope of work to be provided, including MARKHURD's, The City's, and WSB's responsibilities, map deliverables, costs, and general terms and conditions. We understand there are two general options: Option 1: 1" = 833' aerial photography, 1" = 100' topographic mapping with 2' C.!. Option 2: 1" = 425' aerial photography, 1" = 50' topographic mapping with l' C.!. If we are chosen as the successful consultant, a very similar Professional Service Agreement can be used as a contracting vehicle. Please review our proposal and if you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 420-9606. Thank you for your continued consideration ofMARKHURD! Very truly yours, MARKHURD Robert E.Swanson Technical Representative RES:mer .; ftIIARKHURD" EI0215 PART I MARKHURD'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. SCOPE Project Area Our understanding of the topographic mapping area is indicated in green on the attached City of Shorewood map as furnished by WSB & Associates. We estimate the area contains approximately 3,475 acres and is the entire City of Shore wood, MN. 1. Aerial Photography MARKHURD will acquire new vertical black and white aerial photography covering the above mentioned Project area. Photography will be exposed with a precision, 6" focal length mapping camera at a negative scale of approximately 1" = 425' or 833', as determined by the option selected. 2. Control Photos Upon the notice to proceed, MARKHURD will forward to WSB a set of control photos which shall serve to identify the location of the required field control points. Each point will be labeled and numbered on the face of the corresponding Project aerial photograph. In addition, MARKHURD will provide a written description for each of the identified points and if deemed necessary by MARKHURD a reference drawing. WSB will return, along with the requested coordinates and elevations, the control photos to MARKHURD. 3. Analytical Aerotriangulation MARKHURD will prepare a fully analytical aerotriangulation solution to establish supplemental control for orienting individual photogrammetric stereo-models covering the 1 ,,'- ' ftIIAIIKHUIID" subject Project. All field control locations and pass points will be marked on a set of film diapositives using a Kern PMG-2 point transfer devise. Point measurements will be accomplished on one of our Kern DSR -14 analytical plotters. The results will be processed using ALBANY Aerotriangulation software. 4. Digital Terrain Model MARKHURD personnel will compile a digital terrain model (DTM) which will consist of a series of masspoints (x,y,z) and breakline files across the entire Project area. This data will be processed into a DGN formatted file that will be compatible with WSB's Intergraph/Microstation system. In addition, the masspoints/breakline files will be processed through our contour interpolation software to generate continuous contours with either a I-foot or 2-foot interval. Contours will be merged with the planimetric base map for preparing the final digital files and delivered to WSB as 3D contours. Contours shall be shown as solid lines except where depicting an obscured area, i.e. areas of dense foliage, coniferous growth, building overhang, etc. Contours in obscured areas will be shown with dashed lines. Such contours will not meet the accuracy specifications stated in Part I, Section D. 5. Planimetric Base Map Compilation . Planimetric base maps at a scale of 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' will be digitally compiled from the aerial photography on our first order analytical stereo-plotters. Base map detail will include the features shown on the attached leveUlayer lists (see Attachment B1 and B2) to the extent these features are clearly visible on or clearly interpretable from the aerial photographs. Planimetric features will be collected in a 2D mode. 2 ftIIAIIKHUIID" B. DELfVERABLES Items to be delivered under this agreement are: . I-foot or 2-foot topographic mapping as IntergraphlMicrostation DaN files, with 2D planimetrics, 3D contours and 3D - DTM features, on 3.5" discs. C. PROJECT SCHEDULE Upon execution of an agreement and completion of an anticipated April-early May, 1998 aerial photo mission, MARKHURD will furnish WSB a set of black and white 9" x 9" contact prints which will be annotated with the required field control locations . With regards to the topographic mapping, MARKHURD has the resources to meet the most demanding of schedules. Nonetheless, the time required to deliver the mapping items described in Part I. B. above are subject to being influenced by numerous factors (i.e. weather, WSB and City schedules/budgets, completion of ground survey, etc.) some or all of which may be beyond MARKHURD's control. Therefore, we propose to develop and furnish a mutually agreeable mapping schedule upon execution of an agreement. D. MAP ACCURACY Final mapping documents delivered pursuant to this PI:Oposal, where applicable, shall comply with the standards of accuracy as stated in the United States National Map Accuracy Standards. A copy of said standards are included in Attachment A. E. ASSUMPTIONS/CONDITIONS This proposal is subject to the following assumptions/conditions: MARKHURD's cost estimate, is in part based on the assumption that the Project Area as described herein, is accurate. This is your notice that our cost estimate is a firm figure only when this assumption is valid. Therefore, it is WSB' s responsibility to review the 3 . /fIIARKHURD" Project Area for exactness (outlined on the document mentioned in Part 1. A. "Project Area") and notify MARKHURD of any changes prior to the execution of an agreement. F. REPRESENTATIVE Robert E. Swanson, Technical Representative and Carl Osterlund, Project Manager, will represent MARKHURD during the performance of the services to be provided. Each has the authority to transmit and receive instructions, and make decisions with respect to the services. Mr. Carl Osterlund is authorized to commit the necessary resources towards completing the services described herein. 4 . f'lIIIlKHUIlD" PART IT THE CITY/WSB'S RESPONSffiILITIES The City or WSB, at its expense, shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services to be performed by MARKHURD. A. INFORMATIONIREPORTS None identified at this time. 1. Ground Survey Control It is MARKHURD I s understanding that WSB will provide all the necessary ground survey control for this Project. WSB' s control responsibilities shall be performed with reference to points selected and/or approved by MARKHURD and WSB. The approximate locations and number of control points were previously furnished to you on January 24th. Horizontal control may be established by triangulation, traverse, or Global Positioning System (GPS) techniques. In order for MARKHURD to comply with the standard of accuracy specified in Part I, Section D, horizontal control furnished by the WSB shall have an absolute accuracy of 0.2 or 0.3 feet (50' or 100' mapping, respectively). Vertical control may be established by conventional or GPS techniques. In order for MARKHURD to comply with the standard of accuracy specified in Part I, Section D, vertical control furnished by WSB shall have an absolute accuracy of 0.1 or 0.2 feet (1- foot or 2-foot contour mapping, respectively). Upon completion of the ground control responsibilities, WSB agrees to furnish to MARKHURD a list of the required Project coordinates and elevations, all relevant control photographs (when applicable), and copies of field notebooks. WSB also agrees to furnish Project coordinates and elevations in digital form when requested by MARKHURD. 5 ftIIARICHURD" In the event MARKHURD determines that the control data provided by WSB does not comply with the standards stated above, or, in MARKHURD' s opinion would otherwise prevent map production in accordance with the map accuracy standards specified in Part I, Section D, then the control data shall be resurveyed and/or adjusted by WSB. The City or WSB shall compensate MARKHURD at the rate specified in Part III, Section A, for expenses incurred, including production time lost, due to errors in WSB's ground survey control. MARKHURD shall notify WSB immediately if it determines that the furnished control data does not comply with the above stated accuracy requirements. B. REPRESENTATIVE Designate a representative for the Project who shall have the authority to tranSmit instructions, receive information, interpret and defme policies and make decisions with respect to the services. C. INSPECTION OF MAPPING DOCUMENTS AND NOTICE OF NON- CONFORMANCE Upon delivery, WSB shall promptly inspect all mapping documents furnished by MARKHURD. Prompt written notice shall be given by the WSB to MARKHURD if WSB becomes aware that the services do not conform to the standards stated in this agreement. To allow MARKHURD the opportunity to cure any non-conformahce, notice shall be given within seven calendar days of discovery . WSB will not conduct or permit any design, development or construction in reliance upon any data furnished by MARKHURD unless such data are first field verified. Any noncompliance by WSB with this provision shall automatically render null and void MARKHURD's LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY stated in PART IV of this proposal. 6 I"'ARICHURD" PART ill COMPENSATION, BILLING, AND PAYMENT The City shall reimburse MARKHURD for the services in accordance with the following: A. FEE SCHEDULE Our charge for the services described in PART I shall follow the fee schedule outlined below: SCHEDULE Option 1 - 2-foot Digital Topo Map/DTM Compilation. . . . . . .. $31,860.00 Option 2 - I-foot Digital Topo Map/DTM Compilation. . . . . . .. $44,860.00 The above fees are based on the labor effort required to complete the services as described in Part I with accurate field survey data. Therefore, any additional expenses incurred by MARKHURD, including lost production time, which are necessitated by WSB's failure to discharge its responsibilities as stated in Part II, Section A. 1. of this proposal, shall be compensated by the City or WSB at the rate of $65.00 per hour. B. PAYMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Fees, as stated, shall remain in effect until April 15, 1998. If acceptance occurs after this date, we reserve the right to revise our fee and resubmit this agreement (in whole or in part) based on the present conditions. MARKHURD will at a minimum, submit monthly invoices for the percentage of the work completed during the billing period. Terms of payment will be net due 30 days from the date of invoice, and will be subject to a 1.5% service charge on the balance each month thereafter. Unless The City provides MARKHURD with a written statement of any objections to the invoice within 15 calendar days from the date of invoice, The City shall be deemed to accept the invoice as submitted. 7 J Gll 1 U.t. :':j H Ulti:!.J' W UUU MSA STREBT SYSTEM -. .... ,,' J ~ . ;:':::~'~; ;,....,~o:~.~:.~~~?:~:).\~~ lit~ll&i~~:~:?::~:j~.~,~,: ,," ~" ~l, ':(E~"; ......,...,.. - ,"". i i ~l)~~:':"~ ..' p .,~~?;;' ... ))iLl ,I .......'!i 'L.; -.,' .... "\~;J , 'il:I\:~~ ;)/..,. ~\ W:'''. . ~\ i~';i: <:,;~ ....;; '\,.,', L"V.E rlI Ni'JETor.j!(A LOWER L-\:(f. iJ ....-;.""IIS' ;':';-1" ".t, IJEEPH.-\ \'I!N ,'. ",; ~,~' ,I POi) J? ~t. .~...,..<:~.". " : IJ ; ~" '~':I : it! / ,;';:': .1-; ~ .,!~~.'.~~"J<i~:';:;:' . ..: ~:;;';:'.':~\~~;:,~';J..' s k: . .!': ..~:~ ~t.};:L::.' 'Ac ::~~'::: ;';~irh' )\:.;ii ~::~;"~:~.. ".;~ Ol{ONO ! .;ot) ;1('P 'l1-',I;: 1200 ~ 0 120. ;-t....J t; KAtiE I" LEGEND I:; * CITY I o C:T':' i * SCHOO COUNT STATE HIGHW. CITY - - CITY HeRA... U~:.:~~t:~lN4~~i~tt'r\1~\J~~~!'411:" 'i1~~~l~~=~ ._J"I~'-'J.1.i ""'- Ii J~~.~:;" ,~...... "'..''- g (~'!!? ~ ,,, ..;! ~~~ ~:l(.~:~.;t[\.~!~ 1\ ~'\ 1"....... .....t. ..... :i.,...:tl" ;.~,:."rt~"'... ",.!~" .,/ !fj~..~$~.~./ tl . "t." Ii y., .1,;\ : lt~.) " \ ..... "i... '''. ~.~\~~.li~5!.{cJ.:1 '\>~~1!:'t'''~1 :~~."... -.J: ~.\~..~.,. ./;;:5~~~?a . ......r-I!I....,.."t?/I.,.... . i:~ ,,..; "':l~f#il;; .~ ~!N~,;~)~;\!' '; FUTURE ADDITION TO MSA STREET SYSTEM. EXISTING M5A DESIGNED STREETS .......... FUTURE REMOVAL FROM MSA STREET SYSTEM. FALL 1995 Qs..tJ /fIIARKHURD" ATTACHMENT "A" United States National Map Accuracy Standards With the view to the utmost economy and expedition in producing maps which fulfill not only the broad needs for standard or principal maps, but also the reasonable particular needs of individual agencies, standards of accuracy for published maps are defmed as follows: 1. Horizontal accuracy. For maps on publication scales larger than 1:20,000, not more than 10 percent of the points tested shall be in error by more than 1/30 inch, measured on the publication scale; for maps on publication scales of 1 :20,000 or smaller, 1/50 inch. These limits of accuracy shall apply in all cases to positions of well defined points only. "Well defined" points are those that are easily visible or recoverable on the ground, such as the following: monuments or markers, such as bench marks, property boundary monuments; intersections of roads, railroads, etc.; comers of large buildings or structures (or center points of small buildings), etc. In general what is "well defined" will also be detennined by what is plottable on the scale of the map within 1/100 inch. Thus while the intersection of two road or property lines meeting at right angles, would come within a sensible interpretation, identification of the intersection of such lines meeting at an acute angle would obviously not be practicable within 1/100 inch. Similarly, features not identifiable upon the ground within close limits are not to be considered as test points within the limits quoted, even though their positions may be scaled closely upon the map. In this class would come timber lines, soil boundaries, etc. 2. Vertical accuracy, as applied to contour maps on all publication scales, shall be such that not more than 10 percent of the elevations tested shall be in error more than one-half the contour interval. In checking elevations taken from the map, the apparent vertical error may be decreased by assuming a horizontal displacement within the permissible horizontal error for a map of that scale. 3. The accuracy of any map may be tested by comparing the positions of points whose locations or elevations are shown upon it with corresponding positions as determined by surveys of a higher accuracy. Tests shall be made by the producing agency, which shall also determine which of its maps are to be tested, and the extent of such testing. 4. Published maps meeting these accuracy requirements shall note this fact in their legends, as follows: "This map complies with national map accuracy standards". 5. Published maps whose errors exceed those aforestated shall omit from their legends all mention of standard accuracy. 6. When a published map is a considerable enlargement of a map drawing (manuscript) or of a published map, that fact shall be stated in the legend. For example, "This map is an enlargement of a 1 :20,000 scale map drawing", or "This map is an enlargement ofa 1:24,000 scale published map". 7. To facilitate ready interchange and use of basic infonnation for map construction among all Federal map- making agencies, manuscript maps and published maps, wherever economically feasible and consistent with the uses to which the map is to be put, shall conform to latitude and longitude boundaries, being 15 minutes of latitude and longitude, or 7.5 minutes, or 3 3/4 minutes in size. As Published by the United States Office of Management and Budget SO Level/Layer List MlcrnStJltlon T .Avel Alltoc.An T Jlyer 1 2 4 5 7 9 10 II 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 43 44 45 47 52 53 54 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 CONTROL-HORIZONTAL CONTROL-VERTICAL WATER SWAMP ROAD-PRIMARY ROAD-UC DRIVEWAY TRAIL SIDEWALK BRIDGE RAILROAD RAILROAD-CROSS AIRPORT -RUNWAY RADIO-TOWER ELECTRIC-TOWER POLE BUILDING BUILDING-UC SLAB-RUINS WALL BILLBOARD CULVERT POOL GOLF-COURSE CULVERT-LINE UNIDENTIFIED TANK FENCE WOODS TREES PIPELINE UC-LINE SHOULDER HYDRANT MANHOLE CATCHBASIN SIGN-POINT SIGN-LINEAR FLAG-POLE GUARDRAIL CONTOUR-INDEX CONTOUR-INTER CONTOUR-INDEX-D CONTOUR-INTER-D SPOT-ELEVATION BREAK-LINE DTM~POINT APPROXIMATE GRID TITLE Attachment B I n~inn Horizontal control point Vertical control point Drain or shoreline Swamp outline/symbol Road/street RoadIstreet (under construction) Driveway Trail (single line) Sidewalk (PUblic) Bridge Railroad tracks Railroad crossing signs Airport nmway Radio, TV towers Electric transmission tower Utility pole (generic) Building Building (under construction) Slab or ruins Wall Billboard Culvert (point) Pool Golf course (greens/traps) Culvert (line) Unidentified object (line) Tank Fence (major) Woods outline Single tree Pipeline Under construction outline Shoulder (paved only/1 car width) Hydrant Manhole Catch basin Commercial sign (point type) Commercial sign (line type) ~g pole Gwudrails Index contour Intennediate contour Index depression contour Intermediate depression contour Spot elevation Break line DTM point Approximate area Grid ticks Title blocks This is a complete listing of features that we are prepared to collect at IW =50'. We request that you evaluate this list and determine if it meets your needs. MARKHURD reserves the right to charge additional fees for any . W cosmetic W alterations or additional features you may wish to add. :.;'-botier_,5\lOO~L~ f'lARICHURDrM MicroStRtion T .evel 1 2 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 43 44 45 52 53 54 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 100 Level/Layer List Alltoc.An I Jlyer CONTROL-HORIZONTAL CONTROL-VERTICAL WATER SWAMP ROAD-PRIMARY . ROAD-UC DRIVEWAY TRAIL SIDEWALK BRIDGE RAILROAD RAILROAD-CROSS AIRPORT-RUNWAY RADIO-TOWER ELECTRIC-TOWER POLE BUILDING BUILDING-UC SLAB-RUINS WALL BILLBOARD CULVERT POOL GOLF-COURSE CULVERT-LINE UNIDENTIFIED TANK FENCE WOODS TREES PIPELINE UC-LINE SHOULDER SIGN-POINT SIGN-LINEAR FLAG-POLE CONTOUR-INDEX CONTOUR-INTER CONTOUR-INDEX-D CONTOUR-INTER-D SPOT -ELEV A TION BREAK-LINE DTM-POINT APPROXIMATE GRID TITLE Attachment B2. np_<:cnption Horizontal control point Vertical control point Drain or shoreline Swamp outline/symbol Road/street Road/street (under construction) Driveway Trail (single line) Sidewalk (PUblic) Bridge Railroad tracks Railroad crossing signs Airport runway Radio, TV towers Electric transmission tower Utility pole (generic) Building Building (under construction) Slab or ruins Wall Billboard Culvert (point) Pool Golf course (greens/traps) Culvert (line) Unidentified object (line) Tank Fence (major) Woods outline Single tree Pipeline Under construction outline Shoulder (paved onlyll car width) . Commercial sign (point type) Commercial sign (line type) Flag pole Index contour Intermediate contour Index depression contour Intennediate depression contour Spot elevation Break line DTM point Approximate area Grid ticks Title blocks This is a complete listing of features that we are prepared to collect at I. =100'. We request that you evaluate this list and determine if it meets your needs. MARKHURD reserves the right to charge additional fees for any .cosmetic. alterations or additional features you may wish to add. PARTlY STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. STANDARD OF CARE. Services shall be performed in accordance with the standard of professional practice ordinarily exercised by the applicable profession at the time and within the locality where the Services are performed. Professional services are not subject to, and MARKHURD cannot provide, any warranty or guarantee, express or implied, including warranties or guarantees contained in any uniform commercial code. Any such warranties or guarantees contained in any purchase orders, requisitions or notices to proceed issued by Client are specifically objected to. 2. CHANGE OF SCOPE. The Scope of Services set forth in this Agreement are based on facts known at the time of execution of this Agreement, including, if applicable, information supplied by Client For some projects scope may not be fully definable during initial phases. As the project progresses, facts discovered may indicate that scope must be redefined. MARKHURD will promptly provide Client with an amendment to this Agreement to recognize such change, which shall be deemed approved if not objected to within 15 days of receipt by Client 3. SAFETY. MARKHURD has established and maintains corporate programs and procedures for the safety of its employees. Unless specifically included as a service to be provided under this Agreement, MARKHURD specifically disclaims any authority or responsibility for general job site safety and/or the safety of persons other than MARKHURD employees. 4. DELAYS. If events beyond the control of Client or MARKHURD, including, but not limited to, fire, flood, explosion, riot, strike, war, process shutdown, act of God or the public enemy, and act or regulation of any government agency, result in delay to any schedule established in this Agreement, such schedule shall be amended to the extent necessary to compensate for such delay. In the event such delay exceeds 90 days, MARKHURD shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in compensation. In the event MARKHURD is delayed by Client and such delay exceeds 30 days, MARKHURD shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to the delay and an equitable adjustment in compensation. S. TERMINATION/SUSPENSION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice of the other party. Client shall pay MARKHURD for all Services, including profit relating thereto, rendered prior to termination, plus any expenses of termination. In the event either party defaults in its obligations under. this Agreement (including Clients's obligation to malcc the payments required hereunder), the non-defaulting party may, after 7 days written notice stating its intention to suspend performance under the Agreement if cure of such default is not commenced and diligently continued. and failure of the defaulting party to commence cure within such time limit and diligently continue, suspend performance under this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE. MARKHURD will maintain insurance coverage for Professional, Comprehensive General. Automobile, Worker's Compensation, and Employer's Liability in amounts in accordance with legal, and MARKHURD's business, requirements. Certificates evidencing such coverage will be provided to Client upon request 7. INDEMNITIES. To the fullest extent permitted by law, MARKHURD shall indemnify and save harmless Client from and against loss, liability, and damages sustained by Client, its agents, employees, and representatives by reason of injury or death to persons or damage to tangtble property to the extent caused directly by the willful misconduct or failure to adhere to the standard of care descnbed in Paragraph I above ofMARKHURD, its agents or employees. 8. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. To the fullest extent permitted by law, MARKHURD's total liability to Client for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses or damages whatsoever arising out of or in any way related to the Project or this Agreement from any causes including, but not limited to, MARKHURD's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, or breach of contract shall not exceed, either (a) the total compensation received by MARKHURD under this Agreement, or (b) re-performance of the defective services by MARKHURD at no cost to Client. No employee or agent ofMARKHURD shall have individual liability to Client. IN NO EVENT AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL MARKHURD BE LIABLE TO CLIENT FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES. 9. ACCESS. Client shall provide MARKHURD safe access to any premises necessary for MARKHURD to provide the Services. 10. OWNERSHIP AND REUSE OF PROJECT DELIVERABLES. All documents furnished by MARKHURD to Client are instruments of Service and shall remain the property of MARK HURD. These documents include, but are not limited to, positive or negative film, contact prints and enlargements of aerial photography, electronic imagery, maps, inked tracings, and/or all other visual impressions, whether recorded and/or delivered magnetically, electronically, optically or otherwise. Reuse of any documents or other deliverables, including electronic media, pertaining to the Project by Client for any purpose other than which such documents or deliverables were originally prepared, or alteration of such documents or deliverables without written verification or adaptation by MARKHURD for the specific purpose intended, shall be at the Client's risk. Client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless MARKHURD from all claims, damages, and expenses, (including reasonable litigation costs), arising out of such reuse or alteration by Client or others acting through Client 11. AMENDMENT. This Agreement, upon execution by both parties hereto, can be amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties. 12. ASSIGNMENTS. Except for assignments (a) to entities which control, or are controlled by, the Parties hereto or (b) resulting from operation oflaw, the rights and obligations of this Agreement cannot be assigned by either party without written permission of the other party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any permitted assigns. 13. STATUTES OF LIMITATION. to the fullest extent permitted by law, parties agree that, except for claims for indemnification, the time period for bringing claims under this Agreement shall expire one year after Project completion. 14. PREVAILING PARTYLITIGA TION COSTS. In the event any actions are brought to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to collect its litigation costs from the other party. 15. NO WAIVER. No waiver by either party of any default by the other party in the performance of any particular section of this Agreement shall invalidate any other section of this Agreement or operate as a Waiver of any future default, whether like or different in character. 16. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor the performance of the parties hereunder. is intended of benefit, nor shall insure to the benefit of, any third party, including Client's contractors, if any. 17. SEVERABILITY. The various terms, provisions and covenants herein contained shall be deemed to be separate and severable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any of them shall not affect or impair the validity or enforceability of the remainder. 18. AUTHORITY. The persons signing this Agreement warrant that they have the authority to sign as, or on behalf of, the party for whom they are signing. AGllMASTEIVPIlOPSERV.TC March 2, 1995 Shorewood Water Resource Management Plan Section IX Resumes City ofShorewood . Water Resource Management Plan Professional Resumes · Section IX WSB Proposal No. 011.98 A W$8 .-.he Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Vice President WSB & Associates, Inc. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Registration Minnesota Associations American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Resources Association North American Lake Management Society Experience Mr. Willenbring is a registered Civil Engineer with over 16 years of experience in the Water Resources Engineering field working on projects dealing with the management of surface water and groundwater quantity and quality. He has completed Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plans for over 30 communities, Watershed Districts, or Watershed Management Organizations within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. These plans typically include computer hydrologic modeling of multiple watersheds to meet water quantity and quality objectives, establishment of high water elevations, open channel flow profiles, storage requirements and peak discharge rates. Water quality, wetland management, and erosion control design issues were also typically addressed. Mr. Willenbring has also completed Water Quality Management Plans for numerous communities within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. These plans typically include modeling non-point source pollutant loadings from watersheds, designing treatment basins to accommodate pollutant loadings, and modeling in-lake water quality. Mr. Willenbring was recently involved with assisting the Board of Water and Soil Resources in the development of draft rules for the State of Minnesota regarding preparation of comprehensive Storm Water management plans in the Seven-County metropolitan area. As part of this Professional Resume · Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 1 A. WSB ..-- Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) · Comprehensive storm sewer plan and feasibility report for the City of Brooklyn Park. The existing storm sewer system was evaluated and necessary conveyance system and Storm Water storage improvements were identified to meet desired level of protection for area. · Preparation of plans and specifications for the Xerxes Avenue Storm Drainage Improvement Project for the City of Richfield. As part of this effort, plans and specifications were prepared in conformance with the hydrologic design that would provide homes in the vicinity of this project with the level protection equal to or greater than that necessary to provide flood protection during a 100 year return frequency event. · Project Engineer for the Hydrologic Inventory, Hydrologic Modeling, and Water Quality Modeling sections of the Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan. · Non-Point Source Runoff Analysis associated with EIS for Airport South District (Mega Mall) in Bloomington, MN. · Project Manager for a Non-Point Source Runoff Investigation of the Airport South District in Bloomington, MN. Work with Watershed Management Organizations · Project Manager for the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization Lake and Watershed Monitoring Program. · Non-Point Source Pollution Investigation for the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization. · Black Dog Lake Watershed water quality monitoring program. · Preparation of a WMO plan for the Black Dog Water Management Organization. · Preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan for the Crystal Lake Watershed. Professional Resume . Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 6 A. WSB ..-- Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) effort, an advisory committee made up of 50 representatives from over 50 federal, state, regional and local agencies were brought together to provide input on a monthly basis over a one-year period to respond to various drafts of proposed rules governing Storm Water management. Now completed and adopted, these rules provide specific guidance for local communities and WMO's in the development of comprehensive Storm Water management plans. Mr. Willenbring is a former employee of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He served as an Environmental Engineer in the Region V Surveillance and Analysis Division. He conducted inspections of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in Minnesota and Wisconsin which included an engineering evaluation of waste treatment processes, equipment, analytical laboratory procedures and data from air and water investigations. Other duties included performing surface water quality studies on selected lakes and streams in Minnesota and Wisconsin, participating in groundwater contamination investigations, and providing field response for major spills of oil and hazardous materials. Technical Papers "Using Chemicals to enhance the Efficiency andPerformance of Storm Water Treatment Basins." Presented at the 26th Annual Water Resources Conference, October 26-27, 1993, St. Paul, MN. ltSurface Water Management Planning - The Metropolitan Area Experience." Presented at the Water 92 Conference on February 13, 14, 1992, Minneapolis, Minnesota. . "Storm Water Management and Hydrologic Modelingfor Areas within the city of Richfield - A Case Study." Presented at the City Engineers Association Meeting January 17-19, 1990, Minneapolis, MN. "Non-Point Source Pollution in the Rice Creek Watershed District - the Results of 10 Years of Water Quality Monitoring." Proceedings, Non-Point Source Pollution Conference, May 19-22, 1985, Kansas City, Missouri. Professional Resume · Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 2 . WSB 4: A.-...r." Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) "The Use of Wetlands in Treating Non-Point Source Pollution. " Proceedings, Non-Point Source Pollution Conference, May 19-22, 1985, Kansas City Missouri. "Wetland Treatment Systems - Why Do Some Work Better Than Others?" Proceedings, 4th Annual Conference and International Symposium of the North American Lake Management Society, October 16-19, 1984, McAfee, New Jersey. ltLimiting Nutrient Flux into an Urban Lake by Natural Treatment and Diversion." Proceedings, 3rd Annual Conference of the North American Lake Management Society, October 18-20, 1983, Knoxville, Tennessee. "Reducing Phosphorus Release of Long Lake Sediments through the Use of Calcium Nitrate." Proceedings, 3rd Annual Conference of the North American Lake Management Society, October 18-20, 1983, Knoxville, Tennessee. A representative sampling of Mr. Willenbring's project experience includes the following: Water Quality Planning and Lake Restoration · Study and report on quality of water of lakes within Lakeville, MN. · Preparation of permit applications and supportive and technical information to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for work in public waters, wetlands and navigable waters. . · Secured $100,000 Clean Lakes Grant from U.S. EPA for Crystal Lake Improvement project. · Project Manager for design of improvements to a trout stream in Shakopee, MN. Professional Resume . Pet~r R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 3 ..... WSB "~ft:. Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Coni' d.) . Preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan for the City of Shakopee that received a NPDES Permit for non-point source discharge to the Minnesota River. . Preparation of Water Quality Management Plan for the City of Shakopee. . Preparation of numerous EQW's and EIS's for projects having water- related environmental concerns. . Preparation of Water Resource Management Plans for numerous Watershed Management Organizations. Such plans responded to concerns related to water quantity, water quality and erosion control. . Black Dog Lake Watershed water quality monitoring program. . Project Manager for the Long Lake Sediment Phosphorus Release Study. . Project Manager for the Long Lake Chain of Lakes monitoring program. . Project Manager for the Rice Creek Watershed District lake and stream monitoring program. . Project Engineer for an investigation into the use of calcium nitrate for treatment of lake bottom sediments. . Project Manager for the Moore Lake Restoration project. . Project Engineer for the Clearwater River Watershed District Pleasant Lake Outlet project. . Storm Water Management . Prepared a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan for the City of Maplewood, MN. . Prepared a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan for Dean's Lake Watershed, Shakopee, MN. Professional Resume . Peter R. WUlenbring, P.E. Page 4 ..... ~SB --- -' Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) · Prepared a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan for the 8,000 acre Mill Pond Watershed, Shakopee, MN. · Preparation of a Storm Water Management Plan for the Black Dog Water Management Organization. · Development of a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. for the City of Blaine, MN. · Preparation of a Storm Water Management Plan for selected areas within the City of Savage, MN. · Project Engineer for a Water Management Plan for the Shingle Creek Water Management Organization. · Project Engineer for a Water Management Plan for the West Mississippi Water Management Organization. · Design of a wetland treatment system for Storm Water inflows to Golden Lake in Circle Pines, MN. · Project Engineer in the preparation of plans, specifications, and reports for projects involving flood control, site drainage and treatment of non-point source Storm Water runoff. · Study of the storm sewer system design for 40 selected areas within the City of Richfield, MN. · Hydrologic Analysis and Design of Drainage System to serve Mn/DOT State Trunk Highway 101.By-pass in the City of Shako pee. · Hydrologic Analysis and Design of Trunk Drainage System to serve an 8,000 acre area of Shako pee and Jackson Township within the Upper Valley (Mill Pond) Watershed. · Analysis of the Shakopee Upper Valley Drainage System. Professional Resume · Peter R. WIUenbrlng, P.E. Page S ..... WSB .......... .k Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) . Planning for Vermillion River and Gun Club Lake Watershed Districts. . District Engineer for the Rice Creek Watershed District in the Minneapolis- St. Paul, MNarea. . Project Engineer for the Hydrologic Inventory, Hydrologic Modeling, and Water Quality Modeling sections of the Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan. . Project Engineer for a Water Management Plan for the Shingle Creek Water Management Organization. . Project Engineer for a Water Management Plan for the West Mississippi Water Management Organization. Wet/and Management . Design of a wetland treatment system for Storm Water inflows to Golden Lake in Circle Pines, MN. . Development of wetlands/water body classification system for the Cities of Burnsville, Shakopee, and others. . Development of wetland management plan in conformance with State of Minnesota's interim wetland guidelines for the City of Shakopee. . Project Engineer for the Upper Watkins W ~tland Isolation project. . Completed Wetland Design and Replacement Plan, in conformance with interim rules associated with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, for the County Road 46 project in Lakeville, MN. . Designed and constructed wetland as part of a wetland replacement plan for the Diffley Road project in Eagan, MN. . Certified Wetland Delineator for Coon Creek Watershed. Professional Resume · Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 7 .... WSB .............- Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) . Successfully completed a course on Delineation of Jurisdictional Wetlands in Minnesota, sponsored by the State Board of Soil and Water Resources. · Completed Wetland Inventory for the City of Shakopee, MN. · Assisted numerous Water Management Organizations and cities in reviewing and providing comments to the Board of Water and Soil Resources regarding content of rules associated with the Wetland Conservation Act. Flood Control · HEC-2 Flood Profile Analysis to establish the impact of the proposed bridge crossing of Rice Creek. · Project Engineer in the preparation of plans, specifications, and reports for projects involving flood control, site drainage and treatment of non-point source Storm Water runoff · Project Engineer for a feasibility study on dam construction at the outlet of Lake Isabelle in Hastings, MN. · HEC-2 Flood Profile Analysis, City of Minneapolis, AHEC-2 hydrologic model was developed to establish impacts of proposed bridge and channel improvements to Minnehaha Creek. DNR permits were obtained for these crossings based on the information developed. · Comprehensive storm sewer plan and feasibility report for the City of Brooklyn Park. The existing storm sewer system was evaluated and necessary conveyance system and Storm Water storage improvements were identified to meet desired level of protection for area. · Project Engineer for the Ramsey County Ditch No.1 Flood Study. · Design of a groundwater gradient control system for a site at Winona State University. Professional Resume . Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. Page 8 .... WSB ..-- Peter R. Willenbring, P.E. (Cont'd.) . Design of foundation drainage/groundwater gradient control system for proposed expansion of North Memorial Medical Center in Robbinsdale, MN. . Project Engineer for the Rice Creek Watershed District Upper Watershed Impoundment project. Miscellaneous . Study on existing performance and future use of individual sewage treatment systems in Burnsville, MN. . Project Engineer for design of a Liquid C02 Recarbonation System for the White Bear Lake Water Treatment Plant. . Arbitrator for dispute between the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed and the City of Shakopee concerning the hydrologic design for a project. . Project Engineer for the Clearwater River Chain of Lakes Bog Control project. . Project Manager for a hydrologic study of the Battle Creek Regional Park in Ramsey County, MN. . Provided expert witness testimony relative to litigation on numerous Storm Water management related matters. Professional Resume . Peter It Willenbring, P.E. Page 9 .. WSB ......... -- Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Hydrologic Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Florida Institute of Technology Registration Minnesota Associations American Society of Civil Engineers North American Lake Management Society Experience In Mr. Hubmer's prior affiliation with another engineering consulting firm, he served as a hydrologic engineer in the water resources department. He has over four years of experience in the field of water resources engineering. As a proj ect hydrologist, Mr. Hubmer is responsible for completing hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of drainage systems for a wide variety of surface water management- related projects. He is also familiar with numerous water quantity and quality models that can be used to assist in hydrologiclhydraulic analysis. Mr. Hubmer's representative project experience includes the following: Storm Water Management Assisted with preparation of a comprehensive storm water management plan for the City of Shakopee. Completed a stOrln water management plan for the City of Circle Pines. Completed a comprehensive storm water management plan for the City of Hugo. Assisted with the preparation of a comprehensive storm water management plan for the City of Brooklyn Park. Professional Resume - Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. A W$8 .-.... Todd !i. Hubmer, P.E. (Cont'd.) Completed a comprehensive storm water management plan for the City of Richfield. Hydrologic analysis of8,000-acre drainage system to serve MnlDOT State Trunk Highway 101 Bypass in the City of Shako pee. Hydrologic analysis and review of development plans for conformance with comprehensive storm water management plans and in-place storm sewer systems for numerous cities and water management organizations. Hydrologiclhydraulic analysis of several localized flooding problems in the City of Richfield. Completed a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis and prepared a feasibility study to provide storm water drainage and treatment for an industrial development in northern Shakopee. Reviewed the storm water drainage system of the Bell Oaks Estates development in the City of Bumsville.' Reviewed the hydrologiclhydraulic design for the Gonyea Land Development in the City of Shakopee. Assisted in the design of a storm water drainage system for the Excelsior Elementary School improvements for Cunningham Architects. Assisted in the design of a storm water drainage'system for the City ofRosemount Armory site. Completed a hydrologiclhydraulic study of a storm water treatment basin utilizing a lift station for the City of Lakeville. Assisted in the design and permitting process for the construction of the 77th Street storm reconstruction project for the City of Richfield. Professional Resume · Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. A W~8 .-.... Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. (Cont'd.) Assisted in the hydrologiclhydraulic analysis of Bass Lake for the City of St. Louis Park. Completed a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis of existing and proposed storm sewer drainage systems for the City of Rosemount. Reviewed storm water drainage plans for the Southcross Corporate Center development in the City of Bumsville. Completed a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis and feasibility report for the Hyland Lane drainage improvement for the City ofMinnetonka. Assisted in the hydrologiclhydraulic analysis and feasibility report for the Carrolton 4th Addition development for the City ofRoseville. Assisted in the design of the 77th Street Storm Water Improvement Project. Acquired all of the appropriate permits for working in wetlands. Water Quality Planning and Lake Restoration Co-author of "Chemical Treatment Manual for Storm Water Runoff' prepared for the Gun Club Lake WMO. Preparation ofNPDES permit for a water quality management plan for the City of St. Louis Park. Preparation ofNPDES permit for a water quality management plan for the City of Edina. Performed in-lake monitoring of Crystal Lake in the City of Bumsville. In-lake monitoring consisted of collecting water samples from the epolimnion and hypolimnion of Crystal Lake. Analyzed data for water quality evaluation of Crystal Lake. Assisted in the design of a chemical treatment facility for Crystal Lake in the City of Burnsville. ~ WSJ1 Professional Resume · Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. .-... Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. (Cont'd.j Currently undertaking start-up water quality monitoring of the Black Dog Chemical Treatment Facility at Crystal Lake in the City ofBumsville. Assisted in the design of a storm water treatment basin at Diffley Road in the City of Eagan. Prepared the grant application and received the grant from the Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative Grant Program, Metropolitan Council, for the City of Shakopee's proposed Mill Pond Treatment Basin. Prepared a grant application for the Twin Cities Water. Quality Initiative Grant Program to the Metropolitan Council for the City of Shako pee ' s proposed TH 101 Treatment Basin. Reviewed the design of a storm water treatment basin for the Fergus Falls municipal landfill. Prepared appropriate permits to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for improvements in the storm drainage system at Excelsior Elementary School for Cunningham Architects. Performed water quality monitoring of the Golden Lake Wetland Treatment System for the City of Circle Pines. Analyzed and evaluated the treatment efficiency of the Golden Lake Wetland Treatment System. Performed water quality monitoring in Simley Lake and at the in-fall and outfalls of JP-67 and Hurley Lake in the Cities of Inver Grove Heights and Eagan. Analyzed and evaluated the results of this water quality study. Prepared a feasibility report for the City ofBumsville concerning the treatment of storm water run-off directed to Crystal Lake from the Buck Hill Watershed. Professional Resume · Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. ... ~~8 Prepared a feasibility report to provide storm water treatment for the watershed tributary to Langton Lake in the City of Roseville. ......... Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. (Cont'd.) Assisted in the hydrologiclhydraulic analysis of County Ditch 5 in the City of Roseville, and assisted in the preparation of a feasibility report for this public ditch. Work with Watershed Management Organizations Assisted with the preparation of a petition and supportive exhibits associated with a proposed boundary change for the Bloomington-Richfield Watershed Management Organization. Prepared permit applications and the supportive and technical information to the appropriate watershed management organization for the following projects: . Dredging of Bass Lake in the City of St. Louis Park. . The construction of storm water treatment basins within the edge of public waters at Wood Lake in the City of Richfield. Prepared annual reports to the Board of Water and Soil Resources for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization and the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization. Reviewed Mendota Heights' Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan for conformance to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization Plan. Completed the second generation Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Plan to be in conformance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. Currently revising and updating the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Plan to be in conformance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. Wetland Management Developed an operation and maintenance plan for the Golden Lake Wetland Treatment System in the City of Circle Pines. Professional Resume . Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. At. ~S8 .-./0< Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. (Cont'd.) Monitored and evaluated several storm water treatment basins within the Twin Cities for their ability to remove storm water pollutant parameters from storm water runoff. Assisted in the classification and field verification of over 200 wetlands within the City of Shakopee. Developed a storm water management plan for Eagle Creek and a trout stream for the Cities of Savage and Shakopee. Professional Resume · Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.. ... ~S8 ._/0< Jon W. Lennander, P.E., R.L.S. Project Engineer / Land Surveyor WSB & Associates, Inc. Education M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1990 B.S., Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, 1989 Registration Professional Engineer: Minnesota Land Surveyor: Minnesota Experience Mr. Lennander's experience is broad and includes storm water management, flood control, and water quality modeling. Mr. Lennander has more than 20 years of experience in the area of land surveying and civil engineering, including 11 years with a land surveying firm and nine years as a consulting engineer in the area of water resources engineering. Examples of his experience include the following: . District Engineer, Valley Branch Watershed District, Washington County: As the District Engineer, he was responsible for the District's permitting process, the implementation of the District's Storm Water Management Plan, and the administration of the Wetland Conservation Act for the District. In addition, he was responsible for planning, engineering, and construction administration forregular activities of the District. . Designed and participated in the c<?nstruction of a pipeline outlet between Lake Calhoun and Lake Harriet for the Minneapolis Park Board. This work included a detailed study of the interactions of the lakes, the impact of the existing pumped outlet on each. lake, the feasibility of several alternative outlets, and preparation of contract documents for construction. The selected alternative was designed to provide the Park Board with a phased approach to the construction of the outlet, and allowed a portion of the pipeline to be constructed with other park improvements. A WSB Professional Resume · Jon W. Lennander, P.E., R.LS. ~ ........... be. Jon W. Lennander, P.E., R.L.S. (Cont'd.) . Designed and provided construction administration for the completion of a storm sewer pipeline in Lake Elmo for the Valley Branch Watershed District. The project included the installation of 6000 feet of 24-inch RCP with depths exceeding 30 feet and narrow trench restrictions. Groundwater and bedrock increased the difficulty of the project, and several hundred feet of pipe jacking was required. The pipeline was connected to an existing drainage system at each end which required special structures to be constructed by the contractor. . Design and prepared contract documents for several storm water detention basins and associated utilities for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. The detention basins were completed as a part of the implementation of the overall Storm Water Management Plan for the District. . Project Engineer for the completion of improvements along an existing drainageway located in Maplewood and S1. Paul for the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District. The project included the restoration of three concrete drop structures, approximately 3500 feet of concrete channel, and correction of several erosion problems along the drainageway. The work also included the design and construction of a replacement outlet from a large pond at the headwaters of the drainageway. . Registered Land Surveyor involved in all aspects of land surveying services performed by Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. over an II-year period. Types of work completed during thi~ period included: Boundary surveys, subdivisions, platting, and land title surveys Topographic, location and utility surveys Construction surveying Horizontal and vertical control surveys Easement and right-of-way surveys . Prepared several diagnostic-feasibility studies for lakes in Minnesota and Wisconsin, including evaluation of present water quality conditions and hydrology of the watershed and lakes. Based on the results of the A WSB Professional Resume . Jon W. Lennander, P.E., ltLS. .. ........... -. Jon W. Lennander, P.E., R.L.S. (Cont'd.) studies, a feasibility study which included modeling of conditions before and after best-management practices implementation, cost/benefit analysis, and technical feasibility analyses, was completed as a part of projects associated with the Clean Water Partnership Program (MPCA), the Clean Lakes Program (U.S. EPA), and the Wisconsin Lake Planning Grant program (WDNR). · Project manager for a storm water quality monitoring program for the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes, including sampling 16 storm sewer outlets to these lakes as part of a Clean Water Partnership study and the City of Minneapolis municipal NPDES storm water permitting activities for use in preparing the hydrologic and nutrient budgets for Lakes Harriet, Calhoun, Isles and Cedar Lake. Work included designing a sampling program, installing sampling equipment, managing sampling activities, and analyzing collected data. · Project manager of a storm water monitoring study of a portion of Bassett Creek during i992 for the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the Bassett Creek Water Management Organization. Two monitoring stations were established within the watershed to characterize Bassett Creek water quality before entering the City of Minneapolis and discharging to the Mississippi River. The purpose of this study was to determine annual loadings of water and selected pollutants from Bassett Creek to the river and the impact of the City of Minneapolis on the water quality of Bassett Creek. Professional Resume · Jon W. Lennander, P.E., ltLS. ... WSB ........... -- .- Andrea M. Moffatt Wetland SpecialistIBiologist WSB & Associates, Inc. Education Master of Science in Plant Pathology University of Minnesota Bachelor of Arts in Biology College of St. Catherine Associations Society of Wetland Scientists Minnesota Wetland Delineators Association Experience Ms. Moffatt has over three years of varied experience in field and research biology. Ms. Moffatt's experience includes vegetation mapping, wetland delineation, and field and laboratory research. Ms. Moffatt has utilized aerial photo interpretation and on-site field surveys for habitat identification. She has also successfully completed wetland delineation training which utilizes skills in plant identification, soil science, and hydrology. Ms. Moffatt's most recent applicable project experience includes the following: Wetland delineations Ms. Moffatt has been involved in the following wetland delineations: . Wetland 393W in Monticello, MN Wetlands along Trunk Highway 13 in Savage, MN Wetlands along the Hinton Avenue corridor in Woodbury, MN Flay Avenue wetland in Hugo, MN Wetlands along County Road 22 in Chisago, MN . . . . Vegetation mapping Ms. Moffatt has utilized aerial photo interpretation and on-site field surveys to develop detailed vegetation maps. Common, rare, and non-native plant species were identified as part of this project. .A WSB Professional Resume · Andrea M. Moffatt ..~-. -" Michael S. Steuernagel GIS Specialist WSB & Associates, Inc. Education B.S. in Geography, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI Major - Geography; Minor - Cartography M.S. in Geography with GIS Emphasis St. Cloud State University, MN (in progress) Experience Mr. Steuemagel' s experience includes cartographic background with computer mapping, aerial photography interpretation, remote sensing, and GIS (ARCIINFO). He is also experienced as a GIS CAD Technician in the transportation area utilizing Eagle Point software design tools to produce surface models, alignments, profiles, cross-sections, construction limits and earthwork. He has produced plan sheets for final design products which include title sheet, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates, quantity tabulations, miscellaneous details, typical sections, construction sequence and traffic control, detour plan, construction plan and profile, signing and striping, and cross-sections. He was also involved in editing base files for PC ARCIINFO in Intergraph to be used in GIS projects. Mike has worked extensively with graphics, editing topographic and planimetric mapping with Microstation software involving generation of contours with Siteworks software, the edit of the planimetric data, the translation of digital files to Autocad, and bverall layout design of the final delivery products. A representative sampling of Mr. Steuemagel' s project experience includes the following: . Long Range Planning, Sherburne County, MN: Created a Geographic Information System using Sherburne County's State Aid segments as a base. Tasks included dynamic segmentation, and the creation of SML' s for data entry and quality control. Professional Resume . Michael S. Steuernagel . WSB 4;......... .hr. Michael S. Steuernagel (Cont'd.) . GIS Database, Sherburne County, MN: Assisted project manager with the setup of a GIS database to be used for analyzing individual snow plowing routes. . GIS Database, St. Croix County, MN: Assisted project manager with the setup of a GIS database to be used for analyzing individual snow plowing routes. Also created SML' s for data entry and provided overall quality control. . GIS Database, A"owhead Regional Development Commission, St. Louis County, MN: Provided digitizing services, data entry into GIS database and analysis of specific facility management needs for the Arrowhead Regional Development Commission (ARDC). . Soils Data Compilation, Metropolitan Council, Carver and Ramsey Counties, MN: Soils data compilation utilizing ARClINFO and final review of digital product. . Cedar Lake Road Reconstruction, St. Louis Park, MN: Production of traffic control and construction sequence, cross sections, and signing and striping sheets. . CSAH 5 and CSAH 17 Reconstruction, Kanabec County, MN: Production of multiple color realignment layouts for presentation to the County. Production of plan sheets including title sheet, general layout, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates, typical sections, construction sequence and traffic control, construction plan and profile, and cross sections. . CSAH 77 and CSAH 49 at 371 Safety Improvements, Crow Wing County, MN: Production of plan sheets including title sheet, general layout, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates, typical sections, construction sequence and traffic control, construction plan and profile, and cross sections. Professional Resume · Michael S. Steuernagel . WSB .~... Michael S. Steuernagel (Cont'd.) . CSAH 75 Reconstruction, Stearns County, MN: Production of multiple color realignment layouts for presentation to the County. Production of plan sheets including title sheet, general layout, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates" typical section, construction sequence and traffic control, construction plan and profile, and cross sections. . Valley Creek Road Reconstruction, Woodbury, MN: Production of multiple color realignment layouts for presentation to the County. Production of plan sheets including title sheet, general layout, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates, typical section, construction sequence and traffic control, construction plan and profile, and cross sections. . Trunk Highway (TH) 23 Reconstruction, St. Cloud, - Stearns County, MN: Production of multiple color realignment layouts for presentation to the County. Production of plan sheets including title sheet, general layout, estimated quantities, construction notes and standard plates, typical sections, construction sequence and traffic control, street lighting, construction plan and profile, and cross sections. . Oak Grove Creek Bridge, WISconsin Department of Transportation: Responsible for the production of the plan sheets which included estimated quantities, plan and profile, detail sheets, detour routes, and cross sections. Professional Resume · Michael S. Steuernagel .. WSB ..-- . .. . Theodore Witkowski Hydrologic Technician WSB & Associates, Inc. Experience In Mr. Witkowski's prior affiliation with another engineering consulting firm, he served as a hydrologic technician in the water resources department. He has over four years of experience in the field of water resources engineering. As a hydrologic technician, Mr. Witkowski is responsible for completing hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of drainage systems for a wide variety of surface water management-related projects. He is also familiar with numerous water quantity and quality models that can be used to assist in hydrologic/hydraulic analysis. Mr. Witkowski's representative project experience includes the following: Storm Water Management Utilized G .LS. to develop hydrologic characteristics of over 230 subwatersheds in the City of Savage. This process includes overlaying subwatershed boundaries, land use and soils and developing a hydrologic matrices to determine the runoff potential from each subwatershed. This information was then utilized in the development of both a HYDROCAD and P8 water quality model which was incorporated into the City's water resource management plan. Assisted with preparation of Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan for the Cities of Hugo, Shakopee, Brooklyn Park, Bumsville, Richfield Savage and 8t. Anthony. Provided technical support for the preparation of the City of Circle Pines' storm water management plan. Developed mapping and collected data from review agencies for a comprehensive storm water management plan for the City of Hugo. Provided support in developing a hydrologic analysis of an 8,000-acre drainage system to serve Mn/DOT State Trunk Highway (8TH) 169 Bypass in the City of Shakopee. Professional Resume . Theodore Witkowski A WSB ~ .--- Theodore Witkowski (Cont'd.) Assisted in the development of a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis of several localized flooding problems in the City of Richfield. Provided support for a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis and assisted in the preparation of a feasibility study to provide storm water drainage and treatment for an industrial development in northern Shakopee. Assisted in the design and permitting process for the construction of the 77th Street storm reconstruction project for the City of Richfield. Completed a hydrologiclhydraulic analysis and assisted in the development of a feasibility report for the Highland Lane drainage improvement for the City of Minnetonka. Hydrologic analysis and review of existing and proposed storm sewer systems for the City of Minnetonka Storm Water Plan. Hydrologic analysis and review of the South Central District within the City of Blaine. Water Quality Planning and Lake Restoration Prepared appropriate permits to many watershed districts, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for various storm water improvements. Water quality monitoring and data organization for wells serving the southwest area of the City of Bumsville. . Water quality monitoring at Crystal and Keller Lakes in the City ofBumsville. Storm water treatment basin design and plan development for Langton Lake in the City of Roseville. Water quality computer modeling associated with comprehensive storm water management plans for the Cities of Richfield, Savage, Shakopee and Brooklyn Park, MN. Professional Resume · Theodore Witkowski A WSB ......... .--- . :.. ..' . Theodore Witkowski (Cont'd.) Designed and prepared plans for wate quality treatment basin in the City of Shako pee, (Upper Valley Drainageway). Work With Watershed Management Organizations Assisted with the preparation of a petition and supportive exhibits associated with a proposed boundary change for the Bloomington-Richfield Watershed Management Organization. Assisted with the development 'of the second generation Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Plan to be in conformance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. Wetland Management Assisted in the classification and field verification of over 200 wetlands within the City of Shakopee and over 300 wetlands in the City of Savage. Assisted in the development of a storm water management plan for Eagle Creek and a trout stream for the Cities of Savage and Shakopee. Assisted with wetland identifications, delineation, and illustration of wetlands in the Cities of Minnetonka, and Roseville, MN. Prepared intergraph microstation-generated graphics identifying national wetlands and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources protected waters and wetlands. Prepared plans for wetland restoration and mitigation as determined by wetland classification. . Professional Resume · Theodore Witkowski A WSB ......... . ........ -. Charles W. Kochmann CADD Technician/Designer WSB & Associates, Inc. Education Technical Degree - Drafting Minneapolis Drafting School, 1990 General Coursework, 1989 St. Cloud State University Investment in Excellence The Pacific Institute, 1992 Experience Mr. Kochmann serves as a CADD Designer/Technician in WSB municipal and infrastructure group. He has a diverse background in computer aided design including use of Intergraph Microstation Version 5.0, Autocad Versions 10 and 11, and Eagle Point's Roadcalc and Surface Modeling. He also possesses a working knowledge of Windows NT, DOS and Unix operating systems. He is also familiar with ancillary computer programs, both for CADD production and design, including Excel, Word, Powerpoint, Draw, Photostyler, and Procomm Plus. As a CADD Designer/Technician, Mr. Kochmann provides detail design services for infrastructure engineering projects and reports to assist the Design Engineer. He is also responsible for design, CADD drafting and quality control of a variety of infrastructure design projects. Mr. Kochmann's representative experience includes the following projects. 77th Street, Richfield, MN Production of Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Removals, Plan Construction, and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate. Professional Resume · Charles JJ': Kochmann A WSB ',----,-" .-- . .& . .. Charles ~ Kochmann (Cont'd.) County State Aid Highway 75 (Division Street), Waite Park and St. Cloud, MN Production of Preliminary Color Layout and Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Estimated Quantities, Quantity Tabulations, Construction Sequence & Traffic Control, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Details, Plan and Profile, Intersection Details, Paving Joint Plan, Retaining Wall Plan, Signal Plan, Signing and Striping Plan and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate. Cedar Lake Road, City of St. Louis Park, MN Production of Preliminary Color Layout and Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Estimated Quantities, Quantity Tabulations, Construction Sequence & Traffic Control, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Details, Miscellaneous Removals, Plan and Profile, Retaining Wall Plan, Signal Plan, Signing and Striping Plan and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate. Trunk Highway 210, City of Staples, MN Production of Preliminary Layout and Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Estimated Quantities, Quantity Tabulations, Construction Sequence & Traffic Control, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Details, Miscellaneous Removals, Plan and Profile, Intersection Details, Signing and Striping Plan and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate and a Color Coded Plan to display Cost Sharing. Trunk Highway 371, Brainerd, MN Production of Preliminary Color Layout and Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Estimated Quantities, Quantity Tabulations, Construction Sequence & Traffic Control, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Details, Miscellaneous Removals, Plan and Profile, Super Elevation Plan, Street Lighting Plan, Signing and Striping Plan and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate and a Color Coded Plan to display Cost Sharing. Professional Resume · Charles JJ': Kochmann A WSB .oIiiiiiiiiiiil .-- t .. Charles w: Kochmann (Cont'd.) CSAH 9 (Goose Creek) - Chisago County, MN Production of Preliminary Layout and Final Design Plan Sheets including Title Sheet, General Layout, Estimated Quantities, Quantity Tabulations, Construction Sequence & Traffic Control, Typical Sections, Miscellaneous Details, Plan and Profile, Box Culvert Details and Cross Sections. Also Assisted Engineers in calculation for quantities and production of the Engineer's Estimate. Trunk Highway 3, City of Rosemount, MN Production of plan sheets including Title Sheet, estimate quantities, construction notes and standard plates, quantity tabulations, typical sections, construction sequence and traffic control, miscellaneous details, planned construction, signing and striping plan, and cross sections. Also assited with preparation of the Engineer's Estimate. Traffic Signals Production of plan sheets including title sheets, signal detail sheet, signal plan layout, and field wiring diagram. Projects entailed designs of full actuated signal systems and temporary full actuated signal systems. Scott County CSAH 16 and CR 83 CSAH 42 and CSAH 21 City of Prior Lake C.S.A.H. 42 and C.S.A.H. 21 Anoka County CR 132 and Springbrook Drive CSAH 17 andCSAH 12 CSAH 17/CSAH 51 and CSAH 32 CR 116 andCSAH 18/CR 18 City of Shakopee C.S.A.H. 16 and County Road 83 City of St. Louis Park C.S.A.H. 25 and C.S.A.H. 5 (Minnetonka Blvd.)u Professional Resume · Charles w: Kochmann .A. WSB -.-..-....-...... .-- CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-'0128. www.state.neVshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurrn, City Administrator Larry Brown, Director of Public Works ~. . March 5, 1998 . FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion Establishing a Public Information Date for Monday April 13th to Discuss Strawberry Lane Improvement Project During one of the last City Council work sessions conducted on the Capital Improvement Program, staff was directed to initiate a infor5maml public information meeting for the proposed improvement son Strawberry Lane prior to a regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Staff has reviewed the scheduled meetings, and has suggested Monday April 13th from 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM. . If acceptable, a motion would be in order by the City Council approving this meeting date and time. ~ I ~ A Residential Communitv on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore - ... ~ ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 903- WATER USE AND SERVICE OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE L\DOPTINC t...N ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL WLA...TER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 903 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and the following added in its place: SECTION: Purpose and Intent Compliance With Provisions Private Wells Water Service Connections Water Tum-On and Shut-Off Fees Pri'late Wells Installation and Construction Requirements and Specifications Service Pipes Meters Water Rates and Charges Water Connections Served by Adjacent Municipalities Authorized Water Shut Offs Conservation Measures Restricted and Prohibited Acts Discontinuance of Service Mandatory Hook Up, Commercial and Multiple-Family Residential Users 903.16: Right of Entry Powers 903.17: Disclaimer of Liability 903.18 : Water Assessment Process Peli€y- 903.19: Amendment - Notice 903.20: 903.19: Violation . 903.01: 903.02: 903.03: 903.04~: 903.054: 903.05: 903.06: 903.07: 903.08: 903.09: 903.10: 903.11: 903.12: 903.13: 903.14: 903.15: . 903.01: PURPOSE AND INTENT: The City Municipal water system (hereinafter called the water system) shall be operated as a public utility and convenience from which revenue will be derived, subject to the provisions of this Chapter. . 903.02: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS: No person shall make, construct or install any water service installation, or make use of any water service connected to the water system except in the manner provided in this Chapter, nor shall any person make, construct, install or make use of any installation connected to the water system contrary to the regulatory provisions of this Chapter. 903.03. PRIVATE WELLS: 2 Pursuant to the current State Well Code and the Minnesota Plumbing Code, private wells may be constructed or maintained and continued in use whether or not connection is made to the water system. In no event shall there be a means of cross-connection between the private well and the Municipal water system at any time. Hose bibbs that will enable the cross-connection of the two (2) systems are prohibited on internal piping of the well supply system. The threads of the boiler drain of the well volume tank shall be removed of the boiler drain hose bibb replaced with a sinkfaucet. (Ord 313, 9-23-96) City of Shorewood ~./~ - !' '1" 903.04~: WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS: Subd. 1. Existing Service Stubs: Service stubs have been installed to serve some homes and businesses presently located in the City. For those homes and businesses, the connections are ready for use by the existing structures in the City. a. Permit to Connect, Fee: A permit must be obtained to connect to the water system. The fee for each permit shall be as set by Council resolution I. Such fee shall include inspection and turn-on services performed by the City. b. Conditions of Permit: The permit fee shall be paid at the time of making application for water service. In addition thereto, before any permit shall be issued, the following conditions shall be complied with: ( 1) No permit shall be issued to tap or connect with any water main or water system of the City either directly or indirectly from any lot or tract of land unless it shall be determined that: (a) The lot or tract of land to be served by such connection or tap has been assessed for the cost of construction of the water main and water plan system with which the connection is made; or (b) The proceedings for levying such assessments have been or will be . commenced in due course; or (c) A connection charge has been paid. (2) A water meter, meter horn, and remote reader shall be purchased obtained from the City at the time permit is applied for2. (3) If the lot is served by the eastern service district water tower and is below an elevation of nine hundred seventy five feet (975'), a pressure reducing valve (PRV) shall be purchased obtained from the City at the time the permit is applied for if a new connection or upon notice by the City if an existing connection. (4) Inspections: All property service lines shall be inspected by the City Water Inspector before the lines are covered to insure proper construction of the line and connection to the service stub. The owner or contractor shall give at least twenty four (24) hours advance notice to the City Water Inspector when the service. pipe is ready for . inspection. (5) Turn On and Shut Offs: Only an authorized City employee shall turn on or shut off any water supply at the curb stop. ----- I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. 2. Fees shall be as provided in Section 1301.02 of this Code. Cir.... uf S!wrf!H'o()(! , ' . . Subd. 2. New Service Stubs; Application for Water Service Connection: In the .event additional connections or stubs to existing water trunk or lateral facilities are required or desired, applications shall be made at the City Hall on forms furnished by the City. a. Applications: All such applications for service stubs shall be made. by the owner of the property to be served, or his duly authorized agent, and shall state the size and location of the service connection required, and the applicant shall, at the time of making application, pay to the City the amount of fees required for the installation of the service connection as hereinafter provided. The application shall also contain the name of the owner, a description of the property, lot, block and addition, name. of road upon which the property fronts and the signature of the applicant, or his agent, agreeing to conform to the rules and regulations that may be established by the City as conditions for the use of water. b. Performance Bond: For the purpose of assuring and guaranteeing to the City that the installation of the service connection shall fully comply with all of the other terms and provisions of this Chapter, the applicant agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit or a corporate surety bond in the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder. c. Inspections: All property service stubs shall be inspected by the City Water Inspector before the stubs are covered to insure proper construction of the stubs and connection to the water main. d. Additional Requirements: All requirements set forth in Subdivision 1 of this Section shall be applicable to this subdivision. Subd. 3. Connection Charge: If no assessment has been levied and no assessment proceedings will be completed in due course, a connection charge shall be made to the owners of the lot or tract of land to be served. Such charge will be in accordance with and pursuant to resolution of the City Council 1. 903.054: WATER TURN-ON AND SHUT-OFF FEES: A fee as established by resolution of the City Council! shall be charged for turning on or shutting off water except in instances where a connection permit has been obtained by the property owner. 903.05. ~~~;1~ :ELLSr~ Private 'l:ells n,*l)' .ee cOflstnIcted or l'flaintai:fled and ~:= . e whether or Bot COBflect10fllS made to the water system. In flO = -= :e: :: ~ ~ ~! ~~ ;n~n llctween IIle private well and the ~ :.; =:: ;:;; :"i;~-' ;;:;::" t!lat ..111 eaoI>Ie Ille C"'': e~~~t~ ~~ f =~:: :R~o~':;;j ~ffi of Ille well 5Il!'I'Iy ~!~~. H:; ~ t. ~r: ~i I oved of Hie bOMer dram hose bIDb re~laeeel ,.:ItB: a smk faucet. (Oed 313, 9 23 96) I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code.e2. See Chapter 506 of this Code. Cit.... of Shorew()od t r 903.06: INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Subd. 1. Supervision: All work performed within the limits of the City shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code as amended and the Ten States Standards and shall be under the direct supervision of the City Water Inspector and Public Works Director. Subd. 2. Authority to Do Work: Only persons authorized by this Chapter shall tap any distributing main or pipe of the water system, or insert stopcocks or ferrule therein. Subd. 3. Excavations: 1 If the installation is to be in a surfaced street, the location of the water main shall be ascertained from the City Engineer and, upon completion, such installation shall be inspected by the Public Works Department. Prior to construction within the street, notice shall be given to the City Water Inspector, School District, United States Post Office, Police and Fire Departments, and City Public Works Director. Such notice must be given at least three (3) days prior to the excavation for laying of the service pipe, and the connection must be made before three o'clock (3:00) P.M. After approval by the Public Works Department, the street shall be restored to its previously existing condition as directed and approved by the Public Works Department. The expense of such construction and restoration shall be borne by the applicant. Subd. 4. Separate Connections and Meters: No more than one housing unit or building shall be supplied from one service connection except by special permission of the City Council. Whenever two (2) or more parties are supplied from one pipe, connecting with the distribution main, each building or part of the building must have a separate stop box and a separate meter. . Subd. 5. Property Service Lines: All installations of property service lines shall comply with the following: a. Property service pipe must be laid with sufficient waving to allow not less than one foot (1') extra length and in such manner as to prevent rupture by settlement. b. Property service lines must be placed not less than seven and one-half feet (71/2') below surface or finished grade, whichever is lower, and arranged so as to prevent rupture by freezing. c. A shut off or other curb stop shall be installed at the property line and placed so as to . be protected from freezing. d. All underground joints are to be mechanical (compression or flared, not sweated) unless otherwise approved by the City Inspector. e. Joints shall be kept to a minimum with not more than one joint used for service up to seventy feet (70') in length. I. See also Section 901.01 of this Code. City of Shorelt'ood - . . f. All joints and connections shall be left uncovered until inspected and tested at normal water line pressure. g. Connections at mains for domestic supply shall be at least one inch (1 "). h. No water pipe shall be connected with any pump, well, tank or piping that is connected with any other water supply other than the Municipal water system. i. Not more than one building shall be supplied from one service connection unless by special permission from the City Council. j. When two (2) or more buildings are supplied from one pipe, each building must have a separate stop box and separate meter. k. Prior to connection with the Municipal water system, all means of cross-connection to a retained private water supply shall be eliminated. 903.07: SERVICE PIPES: Subd. 1. Maintenance and Repair: It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain the service pipe from the curb box into the structure. In the case of failure upon the part of the property owner to repair any leak occurring in his pipe within twenty four (24) hours after verbal or written notice thereof, the water will be shut off and will not be turned on until the service charge, as established by resolution of the Council, has been paid and the leak repaired. When the waste of water is great, or when damage is likely to result from the leak, water may be turned off immediately pending repairs. Subd. 2. Abandoned Service Installations: All service installations that have not been used for one year, or for any reason have become useless for further service, shall be shut off at the curb stop. Any expense of the City shall be charged to the property and, if not paid within thirty (30) days, shall be treated as a delinquent account pursuant to this Chapter. 903.08: METERS: Subd. 1. Meter Use Required: Except for extinguishing of fire, no person except authorized City employees shall use water from the water supply system or permit water to be drawn therefrom unless the same be metered by p~sing through a meter supplied by the City. Subd. 2. Installation of Meters: All water meters shall be installed by a licensed plumber in accordance with the following rules: a. The service pipe from the water main to the meter shall be brought through the floor in a vertical position. The stop and waste valve shall be installed approximately twelve inches (12") above the floor. City of Shorewood b. The meter shall be located so that the bottom is from twelve to twenty four inches (12"-24") above the finished floor line. The meter shall be set not more than twelve inches (12"), measured horizontally from the inside line ofthe basement wall, unless an alternate method is approved by the City Water Inspector. c. All meter installations shall have a stop and waste valve on the street side of the meter. In no case shall there be more than twelve inches (12") of pipe exposed between the point of entrance through the basement floor and the stop and waste valve. A stop and waste valve shall also be installed on the house side of the meter. Meter setting devices shall be of copper pipe or tubing from the terminus of the service pipe up to and including the house side stop and waste valve. d. A remote reader shall be installed on the outside of the building in which the meter is contained at a height of three feet to five feet (3'-5') above grade. Subd. 3. Maintenance, Repair and Replacement: a. Replacement of Meter: All water meters shall be and remain the property of the City and may be removed or replaced or changed as to size and type by the City whenever deemed necessary. b. Maintenance and Repair: The City shall maintain and repair all meters when rendered unserviceable through ordinary wear and tear and shall replace them if necessary. However, where any replacement or repair or adjustment of any meter is necessary because of damage from hot water backup, damage from freezing water, or damage from any act, carelessness or negligence of the owner or occupants of any premises, any expense incurred by the City to repair said damage shall be charged against and collected from the property owner, and water service may be discontinued until the cause is corrected and the amount charged collected. Subd. 4. Meter Tests: When a consumer makes a complaint that the bill for any past services has been excessive, the City shall, upon written request, have such meter re-read. If the user remains dissatisfied and desires that the meter be tested, said user shall then make a deposit in an amount established by resolution of the City Councill, and the City shall test the meter. The user shall, if he so desires, be present when such test is made. In case a test should show an error of over five percent (5%) of the water consumed in favor of the City, the deposit will be refunded to the user and a correctly registering . meter will be installed and the date of written request and the minimum charge shall not be affected. In case the test shows an accurate measurement of water or an error in favor of the user, the amount deposited shall be retained by the City to cover the expenses of making such test. I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. City of Shore wood . Subd. 5. Unauthorized Tampering With Meter: All water meters shall be inspected and sealed by the City Water Inspector. No person not authorized by the City shall connect,' disconnect, take apart, remove the seal, or in any manner change or cause to be changed or interfere with any such meter or the action thereof. (Ord. 210,5-23-88) Subd. 6. Calibration of Water Meter and Remote Reader: On or before May 1 each year, the City shall mail to each consumer a meter reading card. The consumer shall be responsible for recording the readings for the water meter and remote reader upon such card and shall return such card to the City on or before May 20. Failure of the consumer to return such card to the City by May 20 will result in a late fee being assessed to the consumers account, such fee to be established by City Council resolution 1. The City shall analyze such cards and identify those which indicate a difference in excess of ten thousand (10,000) gallons. The City shall calibrate water meters and remote readers which have a difference in excess of ten thousand gallons (10,000) and shall inform the consumer of any difference in the readings and of the amount due thereon. From. and after May 20, 1993, the consumer shall be responsible to pay for any and all differences in readings between the water meter and remote reader which indicate amounts due for water consumption. (Ord. 249, 1-13-92) . 903.09: WATER RATES AND CHARGES:1 . Subd. 1. Rates and Charges Established: a. Water Service Rates: The water rate due and payable to the City by each water user for water taken from the Municipal water system shall be at a quarterly rate established by a resolution of the City Council 1. Where service is for less than a quarterly period, the quarterly charge will be prorated on a monthly basis. (Ord. 210, 5-23-88) (1) Minimum Rate for Low Income Residents: A minimum charge is established for residents having low incomes. The charge shall be at two-thirds (2/3) of the regular minimum rate; provided, that consumption is under ten thousand (10,000) gallons per quarter. Should the consumption exceed this minimum, the minimum rate reverts to the regular minimum rate. The criteria for determining low income is as set by the Hennepin County CDBG Program Income Limits for Very Low Income and family size. Residents must submit the proper application and income disclosure to be eligible for this rate. (Ord. 274, 5-10-93) b. Meter Charges: A charge for a water meter shall be made by the City. Property owners or users shall pay in advance before delivery of the water meter for installation. Said charge shall be as established by the City Council by resolution. ----- I. See Section 1301.02 of this Code. City of' Shorewood c. Water Turn On: The established turn-on fee will be charged for turning on water where service has been shut off for nonpayment of water billings, failure to repair a leak, discontinuance of service, or other reason specified in this Chapter. d. Estimated and Adjusted Rates: (1) In the event the water meter servicing any property is found to be operating in a faulty manner or to have become inoperative, the amount of water will be estimated in accordance with the amount previously used in comparable periods of the year. (2) The City Council shall be authorized to make adjustments in water charges when the amount billed is erroneous due to a meter deficiency or other mistake. e. Rates Outside City Limits: Rates due and payable by each water user located beyond the territorial boundaries of the City shall be determined by special contract. Subd. 2. Listing of Accounts: All accounts shall be kept on the books of the City in the name of the owner of the property served. All bills and notices sent out by the City shall be sent to the address of the property served. If nonresident owners or agents desire personal notice sent to a different address, they shall file an application therefor with the City. Any error in address shall be promptly reported to the City. (Ord. 210, 5-23-88) . Subd. 3. Bills for Services, Delinquencies, Discontinuance, Tax Assessments: a. Billing: Statements for charges for water service for a quarterly period shall be mailed to each property owner or user on or before the tenth day and shall be due and payable on or before the last day of the months of January, April, July and October following the quarterly period covered by the statement. (Ord. 219, 12-4-89) b. Delinquencies: After the last day of the month in which payment is due, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the unpaid account balance will be assessed and added to the amount due on the account. If the balance due on the account is not paid in full within forty five (45) days of the day on which the account became due, a notice shall be sent to the property owner or user informing the property owner or user that the account is delinquent and that unless the account balance, is paid in full within fifteen (15) days, the water will be shut off and the prescribed shut-off fee will be assessed. c. Discontinuance of Service: If the property owner or user does not respond to the . notice given above, prior to the date indicated in the notice, and the statement remains . unpaid, the water shall be shut off at City of Shcrep:()od . . the curb stop. Prior to the water being turned back on again, the property owner or user shall be required to pay all delinquent charges, plus penalties and shut-off fees, and the prescribed turn-on fee. d. Appeals to Discontinuance of Service: The property owner or user may appeal the notice to the City Council during the fifteen (15) day period set forth in Subd. 3(b). Water service shall continue to the appealing property owner or user pending the decision of the Council on the appeal. Upon the determination of the Council, the water may be shut off pursuant to Subd. 3(c) as set forth above. e. Tax Assessments: All delinquent accounts may be certified by the Clerk who shall prepare an assessment roll each year providing for assessment of the delinquent accounts against the respective property served. This assessment roll shall be delivered to the City Council for adoption on or before October 10 of each year and upon approval thereof, the Clerk shall certify to the County Auditor the amount due, plus a certification fee as established by resolution of the City Council, and the County Auditor shall thereupon enter such amount as part of the tax levy on such premises to be collected during the ensuing year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. (Ord. 260, 10-12-92) 903.10: WATER CONNECTIONS SERVED BY ADJACENT MUNIC IPALITIES: The City Council has heretofore and will in the future enter into contracts with ildjacent municipalities to provide water service to properties located within the City. All permits to be issued under this Chapter shall comply with the terms of such agreements. In instances where the cost of the water hook-up from the supplying city is included in full or in part as a quarterly charge, then such shall be added to the billing for the minimum quarterly water charge to be paid by the recipient. 903.11: AUTHORIZED WATER SHUT OFFS: In case of fire or alarm of fire, water may be shut off to insure a supply for the fire fighting; or in making repairs or construction of new works, water may be shut off at any time and kept shut off as long as necessary. 993 City of Shorewood Cit\, of Shore wood 903.12: CONSERVATION MEASURES: Whenever the City Council shall determine that a shortage of water supply threatens the City, it may, by resolution, limit the time and hours during which water may be used from the water system for lawn and garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing and other uses specified therein. Appropriate notice of such limitation shall be given prior to the enforcement thereof. 903.13: RESTRICTED AND PROHIBITED ACTS: Subd. 1. Unauthorized Turn On or Shut Off: No person, except an authorized City employee or agent, shall turn on or off any water supply at the curb stop. A turn-on or shut-off fee in an amount equivalent to twice the prescribed fee shall be charged for the unauthorized turn on or shut off of any connection to the Municipal water system. Subd. 2. Unauthorized Use of Hydrants, Interference With System: No person, other than employees or agents of the City, shall operate fire hydrants or interfere in any way with the water system. Subd. 3. Supplying Water to Others: No person shall permit water from the water system to be used for any purpose except upon his own premises unless written consent is first obtained from the City. . 903.14: DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE: Water service may be shut off at any curb stop connection whenever: Subd. 1. The owner or occupant of the premises served, or any person working on any pipes or equipment thereon which are connected with the water system, has violated, threatens to violate or causes to be violated, any of the provisions of this Chapter. Subd. 2. Any charge for water, service, meter or other fmancial obligation imposed on the present or former owner or occupant of the premises served is unpaid. Subd. 3. Fraud or misrepresentation by the owner or occupant of the premises served in connection with an application for service. 903.15: MANDATORY HOOK UP, COMMERCIAL AND MUL TIPLE-FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 'USERS: The owner of a property used for commercial purposes or for multiple-family residential purposes, involving four (4) tV/O (2) or more dwelling units, situated within the City and abutting on any street, alley or right-of-way in which there is located a Municipal water trunk or lateral facility, is hereby required at his expense to connect to such facility in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter within ninety (90) days after the date of official written notice by the City Council to so connect. . 490 City of SllOrewood City of Shorewood 903.16: RIGHT OF ENTRY POWERS: Authorized City employees shall have free access at reasonable hours of the day to all parts of every building and premises connected to the water system necessary for reading of meters and inspection. City employees shall be properly identified and shall display such identification upon seeking admittance to the building. 903.17: DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The City shall not be liable for any deficiency or failure in the supply of water to property owners or users, whether occasioned by shutting the water off for the purpose of making repairs or connections, or from any other cause whatever. 903.18 WATER-lMPROVEMENT PROCESS .A..SSESSMENT POLICY Subd. 1. Scope and Purpose: The purpose of this subsection is to supplement the requirements of State law, to provide for the methods to initiate a water improvement, and to authorize the formulation of policies relating to allocating the costs for such public improvements. Subd. 1. Scope and Parpose: This poliey is inteBEledto )Jfo.:ide a fair, eflWtable, aad . consistent meaas of allocating the cost of ',yater impmvemeats. Subd. 2. Defmitions: a. .^~SSESS~1ENT R..^..TE: 'The rate ased f.er City water assessments as computed uader Sabdivision 5. (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) b. ~UILp~IG SITE:. .'\R ar-ea of lafl.d on '.\'l:ic~ a baildiBg exists or an area of Ian. d meet:Hlg-sH}-code r-eqarrements OR which a B\:lildiBg eowd Be constnlcted. c. CONSTRUCTION COST: .^.mount flaid to coooactors for CORstruCtiflg the imflroyements. . ~ =fUCl1ON INTEREST: Coot of flll8lWiag !Be iulpm'''''''als ""'" !Be lime :: :, i = ~ :: osse..ffit)Bt roll is "I'l'reved ~ .~ ~~ S"?^UB~ ~= , s eo', ed fURds. Too mterest rare wIM Be at the e*f3eeteel assessment rate. :. ~:;TIT: A resillc~a1 bIliWiag or p~ lhoreef iBttmde." fot CCR e am y, bat Bot mekldiRg hotels, motels, oorsmg bomes, boardiBg or rooming hoases, or recreational vehicles. ~ ;~~=IT RESIDB~ITL\L UNITS: 'The mlfflber of eq1:1i:~t ::s~= nit i . ~d BY~~~ footage of the Bonr-esideBtial parcel oae anit per 10,000 square feet of lafld area or flOrtiOR thereof. (Ord. 3()'2, 7 10 95) ;. ~: ~ :"Upicd er lObe oce"l'ied by a building ~~ ~ ~:~=s. ~ ~:fl{p=Sl::S "::~ ~:.;;ot;.j;~i ~;;;i'~:l-;'~ site ..!Be a;.1ri<Jt in wmea 5Uea Jot is situated '!I'd !laving its _ _~ _~_-I' t-ge---- a street, OJ a flroflosed street appro.:ed BY t.ae Ceanell. e. ~~~~=R:.~ ~~~ ~~n::ed ~ the jUflCtiOt;l of. and. abettiRg OR t\'~O (2) 0: ~: nte e ; or pOInt of defleetiOfl lfl allgBIB:€int of a smgle str-eet the i~;;~;;gl; of which is ORe hundred thirty five degi'-ees (1 J 5 0) or less. City of Shorewood i. PROJECT COST (Total Cost of Improvemeats): All construction costs, plas costs for admiaistratioa, engineeriag, legal, fiscal, easement acquisitioa assessing, and any project related work pre'/iously doae but Rot assessed. j. RESIDENTl'\L UNIT: 1\ r-esideatial unit is a platted siFlgle famiJy resideatial lot which, ia aceordaa.ce "'.vith the City's zoning and subdi'/ision regulatioa, cannot be further subdi'lided. Subd. 3. Special.'\ssessments: a. Beaefit Priaciple: Special assessmeats, as authoriz.ed by .Minnesota State Law, Chapter 429, may be levied only apoa flroflerty receiving a special beaefit from the imprO'.'ement. Ia Minnesota, the Constitutioa and courts apply this geaeral rule by placiag the following limitations apon the power to levy special assessments: 1) the rate must be unif{)rm and consistent apon all property receiving special beaefit; 2) the assessmeat must be coafined to property specially beaefited; and 3) the amount of the assessment must not exceed the sflecial benefit. The special assessment is a fmancial tool employed by the City as a means of allocating the costs of specific imflro'iemeet flrojects to the beaefited properties and spreadiag those costs over a B:l:lmber of years as specified by the City Coaacil. Special assessments ar'8 billed to the property O'Nner along with real estate taKes. There . is, however, a distinct differ-eRce betv.'een taxes and special assessments. Real estate taxes are a fuactioa of the real estate value as determined by the municipal assessor, 'liMe special asseSSffieats are a direct ruactioa of the enhancement of value or the beaefit which a specific impro'/emeat gi'/es to the property. b. Coasistent & Equitable: Oace an impro',<emeat )Jfoject is initiated and it is determined that the impro'/emeats are aecessary and desirable, the special assessmeat procedure is inteaded to eqaitably and consisteatly allocate and levy the cost of specific improvements to the benefited properties. The City must r-ecover the appropriate portion of the expense of installing public improyements, if undertakea, ',Vhile easuring that each parcel pays its fair share of the project cost in accordance with these assessment guidelines. This policy sets forth the general assessment methods and policies to be utilized by the City .^~clministrator and City Engineer when preparing assessment rolls for approval by . the City Couacil so as to assure aniform and coasistent treatment to the various properties from year to year. The following policy is general in nature, aad certain circumstances may justify de',iations from stated policy 'as determined by the City Council. Subd. 4. Special1\ssessmeat Procedure: A flow chart oa the Shorewood Public Improv-ement Process for Special f...ssessHleat projects giviflg a cletailed explanation of the process is shown on the next page. a. Initiating the Proceedings: Improvemeat proceedings may be initiated in anyone (1) of the followiag three (3) ways: Subd. 2. Special Assessment Procedure: a. Initiating the Improvement: Improvement proceedings may be initiated in anyone ( 1 ) of the following three (3) ways: City of Shorewocd (1) By a petition signed by the owners of not less than thirty-five percent (35%) of the frontage of the real property abutting on the streets named as the location of the improvement; (2) By a petition signed by 100% of the owners of real property abutting any street named as the location of the improvement. Upon receipt of a petition of 100% of the abutting property owners, the City Council must determine that it has been signed by 100% of the owners of the affected property. After making this determination, a feasibility report shall be undertaken and the project may be ordered without a public hearing;, or . (3) By the initiative of the City Council. Petitions for improvement shall be referred for Administrative report and estimated budget. A simple majority vote of the City Council is needed to start the proceedings. Whether in1.tiatiBg the proceeElffigs or accepting a peti~n r.equestiflg sl:leH. proceediags, ~~~ COUacHffiay ~asly =. =~::= ~ =f,;,d ;,p,.,',.meat. f~~~ ~ ~ ~= ___~...: t--.---~--- ~~-____ O__!/_~_-eflStrl:lCt10fl pr-0jects aad recol:lf)cd ea.co tbe~ as completed \:1flder the terms of tH.is policy. Not later than the time a petition is considered for acceptance by the City Council pursuant to either a.( 1) or (2) above, the petitioners shall have executed and delivered to the City an agreement whereby the petitioners agree to pay the cost of the improvement as defined in the agreement and agree not to contest or challenge either the assessment process or the amount to be assessed. b. Preparing the Feasibility Study: An improvement project which is initiated by action of the City Councilor by a 35% petition may be ordered only after a public hearing. Prior to adopting a resolution calling a public hearing on an improvement, the Council must secure from the City Engineer a report advising it in a preliminary way as to: . (1) Whether the proposed improvement is feasible; (2) Whether the proposed improvement is consistent with Capital Improvement Planning; (3) Whether the improvement should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; (4) The estimated cost of the improvement; (5) A proposed project schedule; and (6) Any other information thought pertinent and necessary for complete Council consideration. An improvement initiated by petition will not be deemed to be economically feasible unless the petitioners have agreed to pay the entire cost of the improvement minus any oversize cost and minus the present value of any additional estimated net revenues to the water fund occasioned by the improvement for a 15 year period. An improvement initiated by the City Council may not be deemed economically feasible unless the Council by at least a 4/5ths vote finds the above factors to be present after reducing the cost of such improvement by such amount as the Council in its reasonable discretion defines to be the appropriate City share of the improvement costs. City of Shorewood - c. Holding a Public Hearing on the Improvement: Improvement projects which are initiated by a 100% petition may be ordered by the City Council without a public hearing if the City Council determines the project may be undertaken without unreasonable changes to the Capital Improvement Finance Plan or the petitioning property owners agree to pay 100% of the cost of the improvements. In the case of a Council-initiated project or petition of less than 100% of abutting property owners, the Council must adopt a resolution calling a public hearing on the improvement project for which mailed and published notices of the hearing must be given. The notice of public hearing must include the following information: (1) The time and place of hearing; (2) The general nature of the improvements; (3) The estimated cost; and (4) The area proposed to be assessed. Not less than ten (10) days before the hearing the notice of hearing must be mailed to the owner of each parcel in the area proposed to be assessed. The notice of public hearing must be published in the City's legal newspaper at least twice, each publication being at least one week apart, with the last publication at least three (3) days prior to the . hearing. At the public hearing, the contents of the feasibility study will be presented and discussed with the intent of giving all interested parties an opportunity to be heard and their views expressed. d. Orderiag the Improvemeat and OfEleriag Pr:eparation of Plans & Specificatioas: Following a public hearing a resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any time within six (6) months after the date of the hearing by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, unless the project was initiated by a 35% petition in which event it may be adopted by a majority vote. The Council may not order the improvement unless the petitioners have provided the Council with a consent agreement in a form acceptable to the City signed by all the non-petitioning affected property owners where they consent to the improvement. The resolution may reduce, but not increase, the extent of the improvement as stated in the notices. At this time a special assessment is considered to be "pending" for all assessable properties in the improvement area. (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) ~~~"~~~~;':=.fltJ::k~~~==='::-~: ~~~. ~":: Cauacil t1elefmines to make aay imp";r:; :~1iiif ~~ '?[ ~ ~~art of the work, or order all or pwt of the ~"1:::'= =-: ~~ ~~: ~1) year after the adoptIOn of the r ----H - o--e-u------ :Pf~;~~:~~~SS a different time limit is specifically stated ill the resoluti;: ~d;;g . City of SlwrelVood e. '^1d',ertising for Bids: If the estimated cost of the improvement ex~: $;;,:~ ~!~~~u&; b~ advertised f~r in the le~al newspape~ and S~h ~~~ci:d 7~ fu~t~ length of tIme as the CIty COI:lncll deems deSIrable. U t ~~Y:~~:~ e~c:eds $100,000, the ad'y<ertisement must ~e ~~ ~~~: ~::~~ ~ ~ tffst class CIty, or lfl a trade ]3aper HOt less than three (3) 'l.ee 1 1 t1 e e submission of bids. The notice must contain the foUo'l/ing inf~~;ti~: 1195 City of S/zore>rood - (1) The work to be dORe; (2) The time whel'l bids will be publicly OpeHeG which mast be Hot less than ten (10) days after the fIrst publication of the ad'lertisemeat whef} the cost is less than $100,000, and not less that three (3) weeks after peblicatiol'ls in all other cases, aad (3), A statement that no bids will be coasider-ed unless they are sealed and accomp~fl1ed by~ash, a cashie:'s check, bid baRd or certifIed check for such percentage of the bid as specIfied by the City CounciL f. Awarding Contracts: Follov/i-Hg receipt of the bids, the City C01:.lncil must either: (1) .\ ward the coatract to the 10'llest respoasible bidder; or (2) R-eject all bids. The coatact must be awarded no later thaa one (1) year after the adoptiof} of the resolutioH ordering the impro'lement unless that resolution specifies a different time limit:- . The City Council may parchase the materials and order the work done by ooy labor or in any manner it deeFl'l5 proper if: . (1) The initial cost of the entire work does not exceed $25,000; (2) No bid is sabmitted after ad':ertisemeftt; or (3) The oBiy bids are higher thaa the eBgineer's estimate. g. PrepariHg Proposed l\.ssessment Roll: The City EBgineer and .\dministrator/Clerk mast calculate the amoURt to be specially assessed against every parcel of land benefIted by the improvement. The afea to be assessed may Be less than, bat not more thaD, the ~a proposed to be assessed as stated in the notK:e of peblic hear..ng Of} the Improvemeat. Mter fees and charges are prepared per Subd. 6 of this Ordil'laDce, the assessIDeat roll will be prepared. The assessmeat r-oll shoald coatain a descriptioa of each parcel of property and the assessmeat aI'l'lffiint inclading aD)' def~ed assessmems. The assessment roll must be fIled \'1ith the City '^1c1miflistrator/ Clerk and be available for public inspection. (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) h. Holding Public Hearing on Pmposed ..^..ssessme^ts: '^1 public hearing on the special assessments must be held following published aad mailed aotice ther-eof. The notice of the assessmeat public hearing must i-Hclude the following illformatioB: (1) The date, time and place of the meeting; (2) The general nature of the imt>f-o'lement; (3) The ar-ea proposed to be assessed: 1195 Ciry ofS/wrewnod City o{ Shore\\"()()d ( 1) The total amouFlt of the proposed assessment; (5) That the assessment roll is on fIle with the Clerk; (6) That written or oral objections ',vill be considered; a aunt of assessmeats unless a (7) That ~o appeal may be ttc-en a~o o~'~e~ fIled with the City Clerk prior written objection sIgned by the affect~ yrope TO h a . g' and to the hearing or presented to the presIdmg officer at t e earm , t t the district court by serving (8) That the O\vI?-er may app~~ the asses~~~~Fl 0 da 's after the adoption of the notice on the May?r or C~ty CI.erk wItlua t~.~~~) t;~ (1 of da~s after such appeal to the assessment and fIlmg notice WIth the court ..1 Hn Mayor or the City Clerk. The notice of the assessmeat hearing must be pu~lished in the legal newspaper at least once, not less than two (2) \veeks prior to the heanng. . . t aeariFlg to the OV/Fler of each par<Jel The City Clerk must mail Flonce of the ~~~essm~~eeks rior to the heariFlg. The mailed described in the assessme~t roll ~t.least tho .(22" aonPrequired to be iFl the published notice must also include, 1Fl a~dinon to " e Hl OfIlla . notice, the following iFlformatIon. assessed against that particular loti piece or (1) The amount to be specially parcel of land; and the (2) The ri~ht of tHe property o',veer to prepay the entire assessmeat persoR to whom pr:paymeats must be made; authorized by prepayment of the assessment has btlen (3) \\'hether partial ordinance; The time v:ithin which prepayment may be made without the assessment of (1) interest; and (5) The rate of interest to accrue if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period. . t hearHg or at any adjournment . i. Adopting the Assesst,nents: At the asses~:~~ents ;s proposed or adopt the thereof, the City Council may adopt the as asse'ssment differs from tHe proposed assessmeats with amendments: If the adopted ti statiFlg the amotmt of the adopted assessment, the clerk must mail the ov~re~~t~c~~de any and all defermeFlts on large . assessment. The adopted assessment ro s or unplatted parcels of land. ^ Eli . ^ fief the adoption of the assessment, j. Transmitting "^1ssessme~t to CO~Rt~ d":u r~~ ~~y of the assessment roll, including the City Clerk must transFIlit a ~ert1 ~ HP I ,^. all deferred equivalent residennal UllltS to the Count) . 1uditor. , , . r 'of the City that all properties shall pay Subd. 5 Special '^1ssessment Pol1C.les: It IS the po IC) ta' benefIt It is not intended that . f I al' ~fa"emeFlts as e:y . their fair share of the C?st 0 oc Am f: "ements without paying for them. any property shall receIve the bene ts 0 Impro, 1195 City of SllOrewood City of Shorewood . a. Establishing an .^..ssessment Rate' :y: . b 9010w, the City C..."cH IHf1Y eha.. ~ID\ a DlIS6 rate as eolOOlisllotl io SabtiivisioB 5 m~atlOn. For the purposes of this SUb~"~ ~ assess!lleat. rate iH'.nually to allo....1 for ~SIl'lg. the . il'ldex of constructioB costs f~~SI~~, ~ ;nflatlO,n rate shall ~e established EngIeeenng News Record" or tHe "Cans ~It) s regIOn, as pabhshed by the u l:lmer cuce lBdex". (Ord. 306, 10 23 95) b. Base Rates: The City Couecil ffi ' h construction methods or materials caa) c aB:ge .the ~ase rate due to changes in topography or cORstruction areas 0; o~ged ca~ lffiprovemel'lt costs, difficult water service to the remaiHder or' th C ty e~ges mhereRt ~o the cost of providil'lg careful study afld report by the Ci; E~: ~ B~e .Rate WIll only be changed after rep?~ shaY ieclude, but Hot be limite~eer hJ:BdiCatHlg a l'leed for a chaflge. This antiCIpated with regard to cOBstructiol'l 0, tl e ch~ge~that have occ~rred or are remainiBg geographical area(s) of the G'~~ds, e,apItalIn,'lprovement costs, and the 1,; e t1e sened by City '.vater. c. Term of .^..ssessment: l\ssessmeRt ~ n' year period uBless the City CaMBell d St or.n ate:1.. sheMld be assessed for a fifteen. (15) appropriate. e enml'les mat some oilier period of time is HlOre d. Government Owned Pro~erties' P' . including the City, will be assessed th ropertles beJol'lgmg to go.vemmel'lt jurisdictions e same as pnvately ov/ned property. ' e. Non developable Lafld' S ec'al ^ deemed ul'lbuildable due to' theP 1. t . ..ssessments shall Bot be levied on properties cOI~pletely withil'l zoned wetlafl~~IS ~flC~ ofl ~1'1developed laRds lyil'lg 'Nholly and havmg restricted soils as determifled bO~ th! ~r~' B~l~ protected wetlaflds afldlor parcels of lafld are assumed to be buildabl .:1 tj "l:lilding ~spector. Howe'ler, all e l:lBttt pm , el'l otherWise by the oV/l'ler. f. Ieterest Rate: The interest rate ch . el ?ebt issl:laflce shall not exceed two ~e OR assessmel'lts fo~ all projects fmanced by Issae. This is necessary in order t .p rceat 6(2%) of the Bet mterest rate of the bond to reil'lvest assessmeat pr-e a 'men~s :sar~ a eqaate cash fl?w when the City is unable of debt or when the City e~p~riences p:;ftefest ;ate ~ffiClel'lt to ~eet tb,e ieterest cost the event no bonds are issued theB th t e~. 0 pay meat collectioB dehnquencies. In tV/O (2) percent greater tRail the a" e ra e a Hlte~st on assessments shaY not exceed previous calendar year or the Cl:lff~:~~ ~te of ~est OR all bonds issued in the special assessmel'lt installmeBts shall b ~Ket ml:lBIclpal baRd rate. Interest 01'1 initial adopt.ing the assessment. Owners ml:lst ~~I~~~fi ac~~: fr~ ~ date of the resolution the City COUflcil regardiBg interest e, Y ffi ?t' aay chaflges adopted by those cOl'ltained il'l the 1'10tice of +1.. rates or p,.lrepa)~eBt reqUIrements which differ from 1:118 proposett assessment. g. ~a~nt Procedures: The prone......' 1.. CORSIderrn.g paymeat of assessments: t'....; OWBer l1.as four available OptiORS whel'l (I) Tax PaymeBt If BO actioB: el ill b special assessment installmeets mill a IS un ert ~el'l y the property o',vner, then stat-emeet for the duratioB oJ: +1..e n wear anFlllally on the individual's prope......' tax t'1:tt assessment term. ..,; . 1195 Ciry of S/torewood City of Shore wood 1195 (2) F1:1ll Payment No interest will be charged if the entire assessmeRt is paid ....ithiFl 30 days of the date of adoption of the assessment roll. h.l the initial year, the property O'.Yller may at any time between that date and NO'lember 15, prepay the balance of the assessment with interest accrued to December 31 of that years (3) Partial Payment The propertyowRer has a one time opportl:lRity to FBalce a partial paymeRt redl:lction of any amount against higher assessmeFlt. This optioFl may only be exercised within the 30 day period immediately following adoption of the assessment roll. ( 1) Prepayment The property owner may, with the ex.ception of the current year's installmeet of priFlcipal aed iRterest, pay the remaining assessmeRt Balaooe at any time, prior to November 15 withol:lt further interest charges. Thereafter, the next installmeet, with ieterest through December 31 of the followiRg years will Be le'/ied for collection with the real estate taxes payable the eRsuiRg year. The priFlCipal Balance will be reduced by the amount of the iFlstall-.n'l:eFlt. (5) Partial Prepayment of Special .^..ssessments Special assessments may be partially prepaid subject to the following pro'lisions: (a) Partial prepayments shall be made to the City Finance Director. (b) Partial prepayments may be made not more than once per calendar year. (c) Partial prepaymeRts may be paid in aHloants not less than 10% of the origiFlal assessmeFlt. (Ord. 304, g 14 95) . h. l\ppeal Procedures: No appeal may be taleen as to the amoant of any assessment adopted uFlless a writteFl OOjection sigeed by the affected property O':lller is fIled with the City .\dmiFlistrator's office prior to the assessment hearing or ]3feseated to the presidiFlg officer at the heariFlg. The property O\':Fler may appeal an assessment to District Court by serving Rotice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and fIling such notice with the District Court ':.ithin 10 days after service of the appeal upon the Mayor or. City Administrator. i. Reapportionment Upon Land Division: When a tract of land against which a special assessmeRt has been levied is subsequently dhided or sabdivided by plat or otherwise, . the City Council may, on application of the owner of any part of the tract or on its o.....n motion, equitably apportion among the various 16ts or parcels iB the tract all the installments of the assessment agaiFlst the tract remaining unpaid and not then due if it determines that such apportionmeet will not materially impak COlleCtiOR of the unpaid balance of the original assessment against the tract. The City Coancil may require furnishing of a satisfactory surety bond in certain cases as specified in Minnesota Statutes Section 129.071, subd. 3. Notice of the apportionment and of the right to appeal shall be mailed to or personally served upon all ov/ners of any part of the tract. In most cases dividing the assessment balance evenly on a unit or lot basis would result in an equitable appo~ionment. If equitable in a particular case, s1:1ch a procedure would be most practical afld administratively effective. City ol Shorewood . Sl:lbd. 6. ^ ~ . ..ssessment .1etbod: a. Unit Method .^..ssessments f{)r City vlater shall be. made accordance '.vith follo',,:mg table: 1H ilie f{)rmula ill the Formula I LaBd Use ExistiBg Future Lot of ReeordIU nits Newly Created Lots or UBits SiBgle Family & I + Multiple Family* R I 0.25 RU T I 0.25 TU I Praperty ZaRed . Commereial But Not ~ .75 T Uel.5 T Ue Yet Used ,,'\s Suell ZaRed aBd 1.5 R Ue Deyeloped as .75 T Uel.5 T Ue Cammereial Propert)' Sellools, Cllurehes, R (10,000 s.f. of land or less) T (10,000 s.f. of land or less) CayerBmeBt, aBd Other N oBresid.ential 1.5R (over 10,000 s.f. of 1.5 T (over 10,000 s.f. of laed) laeat In addition to the above, de':elo~ers of De'" saeEli"isiaas ",'1113 . e . . services and appurteaant items at the time '~f platti~g. ..1 e requITe to mstaU lateral mains, New assessment chBi'ges ap~liee' 1 e' . amount of assessment ehar~es av::n:e ne~v '! (lldedlOr developed land shall be credited the o 0 ongma pBi'ce. . T Trnnk Cbarge' ^ a as e . be le'/ied uHd~r' ~y os;~::n~ ,~~ at t~e tIme a Rew lot is ere~ted. This ehBi'ge may will be made a"ail 131 a o..1Hg C}feH~~~ces: a) water IS available, b) water request~ that the aas:e~=~n~tb~o fe~:dI;~Sl~:Oi1r:~~igO~ c) tthe de.v~~?per connectIOB fees at a later date. . a OR a pa) .. ater R .^..n assessmeat le':ied agaiRst a lot ,-,:hen water becomes a'/ailable. U tt of dwelling units. Ue: Namber of equivalent residential uaits. 0198 Cit\, of Shore wood * .Multiple family dwellings inc11:1de those buildiags desigBed v:ith two or more dwelling units. For the purposes of this ordiRance, eo more than 12 dwelling ullits will be allovled for each base rate ( R ) applied. .i\ssessment fees and tmnk charges are per structure. (Ord. 302, 7 1095; Ord, 306, 10 23 95; Ord. 322, 6 9 97) b. Corner Lots: Shall be assessable when ""yater becomes G'lailable. Subd. 3. Deferred Assessments: a. The City Council may defer Special Assessments: On homestead property owned by a person who qualifies under the hardship criteria set forth below. b. Procedure: The property owner shall make application for deferred payment of special assessments on a form prescribed by the Hennepin County Auditor and supplemented by the Shorewood City Administrator. The application shall be made within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll by the City Council and shall be renewed each year upon the filing of a similar application no later than September 30. The City Administrator shall establish a case number for each application; review the application for complete information and details and make a recommendation. to the . City Council to either approve or disapprove the application for deferment. The City Council by majority vote, shall either grant or deny the deferment and if the deferment is granted, the City Council may require the. payment of interest due each year. Renewal applications will be approved by the City Administrator for those cases whereby the original conditions for qualifications remain substantially unchanged. If the City Council grants the deferment, the City Administrator shall notify the County Auditor who shall in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.194, record a notice of the deferment with the County Recorder setting forth the amount of assessment. Interest shall be charged on any assessment deferred pursuant to this Section at a rate equal to the rate charged on other assessments for the particular public improvement projects the assessment is financing, If the City Council grants an assessment deferral to an applicant, the interest may also be deferred, or the interest may be due and payable on a yearly basis up until the assessment period terminates and only the principal. is deferred. The decision as to whether the principal and interest or just the principal is . deferred is decided by the City Council when considering the application. Conditions of Hardship: a. Any applicant must be 65 years of age, or older, or retired by reason of permanent and/or total disability and must own a legal or equitable interest in the property applied for which must be the homestead of the applicant, or b, The annual gross income of the applicant shall not be in excess of the very low income limits (50% of median) asset forth by family size in Hennepin County's Section Eight guidelines. Calculation of the total family income shall be determined by the summation of all available income sources of the applicant and spouse. 0198 903.18 903./9 City of Shorewood Income specified in the application should be the income of the year proceeding the year in which the application is made, or the average income of the three years prior to the year in which the application is made, whichever is less, and c. Permanent and/or total disability shall be determined by using the criteria established for ''permanent and total disability"for Workman's Compensation, to wit: ( 1) The total and permanent loss of the sight of both eyes. (2) The loss of both arms at the shoulder. (3) The loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial members can be used. . (4) Complete and permanent paralysis. (5) Total and permanent loss of mental faculties. (6) Any other injury which totally incapacitates the owner from working at an occupation which brings himlher an income. An applicant must substantiate the retirement by reason of permanent and/or total disability by providing a sworn affidavit by a licensed medical doctor attesting that the applicant is unable to be gainfully employed because of a permanent and/or total disability. Subd. 7. Deferr-ed :\.ssessmeats: a. The City CouFlcil may defer Special .'\ssessmeflts: OR eomestead property O\vned by a persoa wbo qualifies under tee hardship criteria set fertb below. . ~ ~ ;;: property ..mor sIlaII _ awJiealioa fer ..ferred P"ymeat .f c.ve",~-----s men-- OR a form presenbed by tRe HeBBef)la C~~ ~~~r = ~:: ii ~~herew.Od City Admiffi6lraIor. The ~arien_~~ ~ ~ ;; -~-s- it tft.- adoptloR of the. assessment roR by 1:he CIty Counci1C'~~~~ ~;;;;;ed e~h year UpOfl 1:he fIJing of a simHar applieatioR HO later than September : ~ ~y ::nstrator ,shall est.ablish a e~ aaml3er for eaeh aw1icati~; r:~i:~ ~a -0 -0...- -o--complete mf-ormaUofl and details aad malc.e a recolIlfJ.'le~~~:O ~ crtYc~ii ~~ ;itRer appro':e or disaflpro'le tRe application for def1~' ~~ C~n~ilby-~ajority 'IOte, shall either gFaflt or deRJ 1:he defermeBt aad if the ~~~:~t i; g;;t~, the City CouFlCil may requir-e tRe paymeat of iFlterest ~ ~::~ ~':.~' Ren;;;! applicatioRs will be approved by 1:he City :\dmiflistFator for those cases ;h~;~bY the origiBal cOHditioas for qualificatiofls remaifl sabstaatially uFlchanged. If th~ Ci~ Couacil ~raflts the defe~Bt, ~ City L^"dminisIDitor ~halJ FlOti~~ ~~~ =~;~ ;h:=o~ce WIth MHmesota Statutes', ~eCtlOR 135.191, record a __ . _ __ e-.-. e -e---- - -- wIth. tRe COUflty Recorder settlflg forth the amo1:lftt of assessment. Inter~st ~all be charged on aay asseSSHleat deferred ~ant te this SectioR at ~_~:: ;;; :.:.:: =:: ~R etiler ""_""'ORIS for !he. ~ ~~ ~.= pt'~;ttte--- SfM- B--- -naflcmg. If the City COl:lB611 gran~~ ~~~~ :::: :::.: ~ =~ ""'Y also B. defcrmd. or IBe ililcreOl mny Be ~. ~ ~~ ~___ ---u:-til the assessmeflt penod termmates and o~l.?: ~: ~~~~~ :~ f, . Ta;d;~i;~H as to whether the priROipal and iRterest or just the principal is deferred is decided by the City COlmcil wllefl eeHsideriBg tbe application. Conditiofls of Hardship: a. "^~ny applicant IlRlst be 65 years of age, or older, or retired by reason of permanent aadlor total disability and mest own a legal or equitable interest in the property applied for '.vmca IlRlst be the homestead of the applicant, or b. The aflflual gross income of the applicant shall not be in excess of the very low income limits (50% of median) asset forth by family size in Hennepin County's Section Eight guidelines. CalculatioB of the total family income shall be determi:Bed by the summation of all available income sources of the applicant and spouse. Income specifIed iFl the application should be the income of the year proceeding the year in which the application is made, or the average income of the three years prior to the year iFl which the application is made, whichever is less, and c. Pormaneat and/or total disability shall be detennined by using the criteria established for "permaneat and total disability" for Workman's Compensation, to vlit: (1) The total and permaneBt loss of the sight of both eyes. (2) The loss of both arms at the shoulder. (3) The loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artifIcial membors . can be used. . ( 1) Complete and permaneat paralysis. (5) Total and permaneat loss of mental faculties. (6) .^JlY other injury which totally incapacitates the o'.vner from working at an occupatioFl wmch brings mmlber an income. An applicant IlRlst sabstaatiate the r~tirement by reason of permanent andJor total disability by providing a sworn affidavit by a licensed medical doctor attesting that the applicant is aFlable to be gaiFlfully employed because of a permanent and/-or t-otal disability. (Ord. 300, 6 12 95) Subd. 8. City Council may adjust the fInal assessment as appropriate to satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 129. (Ord. 302, 710 95) . Subd. 4. Policies: The City Council shall establish nnd may from time to time modify policies pertaining for the fair, equitable and consistent allocation of the cost of water improvements. Such policies may relate to factors for determining economic feasibility, fees and charges for connecting to the system and such additional matters as the Council shall determine appropriate in its reasonable discretion. 903.19: AMENDMENT - NOTICE. This chapter may not be modified, amended or repealed until a public hearing is held thereon by the City Council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the city's official newspaper and in its city newsletter at least 10 days prior to the day of the hearing. Failure of any person to actually receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings provided a bona fide attempt to comply with these provisions has been made. 903.20903. 19: VIOLATION: Any person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 210, 5 23 88) Draft 1 - 2/11fR:&/98 City ot'Shorewood . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY POLICY REGARDING THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City ordinance code authorizes the City Council by resolution to establish policy regarding the City's municipal water system; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that a clearly articulated policy statement will serve several important functions including, without limitation: 1. 11. 111. provide for the consistent application of rules and procedures; provide the justification for Council decisions in particular circumstances; adequately inform the public of the circumstances and requirements under which municipal water may be provided; and facilitate the development of long-range capital programs for the municipal water infrastructure; and IV. WHEREAS, in considering the adoption of such a policy and any future amendments, it is appropriate for the Council to take into account such matters as expectations based upon past practice, equity, revenue productivity, political accountability, together with the Council's vision of the role which municipal water plays in the future of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. Scope. This resolution shall apply to the City's municipal water utility only, and none of the provisions contained herein will be deemed, by implication or otherwise, . to be applicable to any other municipal improvements. . 2. Effect on Existing Improvements. Improvements for which assessments are pending or levied shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 903 of the City Code in effect on January 1, 1998, (or on the date of the levy of such assessment if earlier). Improvements which are the subject of executed development agreements shall be subject to such agreements whether or not the improvement has been constructed. Future connections to existing City lines shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 903 in place on January'l, 1998, unless the Council in its discretion determines otherwise on a case-by-case basis. A copy of the provisions of Chapter 903 in effect on January 1, 1998, is attached to this Resolution as Attachment A. 3. A~ement and Waiver. No improvement will be ordered until and unless the petitioners and all affected property owners have executed and delivered to the City an agreement and waiver in the form substantially shown in Attachment B. and all non-petitioning affected property owners have executed and delivered to the City a consent agreement in a form acceptable to the City shown in Attachment C. JBD137416 SH230-2 4. Hook-Up Following Initial Assessment. An individual applying to hook-up to City water installed after January 1, 1998, will be required to pay an amount equal to the assessment and other hook-up and connection charges paid by the individuals who initially hooked up to the improvement, together with interest. The Council may, but is not required to, provide for the payment of all or part of such charges over time and in a manner similar to a special assessment. 5. Effect of Resolution on Section 903.18. To the extent not inconsistent with the policy statements contained in this Resolution and any amendments to Chapter903, the provisions contained in Section 903.18 of the code as of January 1, 1998, shall serve as guidelines to the Council in formulating decisions regarding municipal water. The Council is free to disregard such guidelines when it determines to do so would be in the best interest of the orderly administration of the municipal water program. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this _ day of 1998. Tom Dahlberg, Mayor . ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator . JBD137416 SH230-2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB, ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612} 474-3236 FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hurm, City Administrator ~/ . FROM: Larry Brown, Director of Public Works DATE: March 5, 1998 RE: Consideration of a Motion Regarding Audio Visual Improvements to the City Council Chambers Due to the timing of this proposal, this item will be forwarded to the City Council members under separate cover on Friday. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. . :j:/: i :7 ! - ) , .---. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ ... . . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331~8927 · (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474:0128. www.state.net/shorewood · cityhall@shOrewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion Regarding Audio Nisual Upgrades in the City Council Chambers During the various work sessions for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), there have been several discussions relating to how to improve presentations of reports in the City Council chambers, in addition improving presentations for the television audience. Over the last 6 months, staff has been working with ML Keith Johnson a consultant from Minnetonka Sound and Lighting regarding such improvements. Attachmentl is' the proposal provided by Mr. Johnson. One of the challenges of this task was to provide a method of showing pre~entationboards or pictures to.the television audience with enough detail to be informative about the various projects presented. The City Council may recall that previous proposals had been reviewed last year with cameras and equipment ranging in the 30 to 45,000 dollar range. These previous proposal were cost prohibitive. The proposal provided here is under the $ 22,000 budgeted in the CIP. " - As a brief summary, the following is a description of the major components of the system. Attachment 2 is a diagram'showing various components of the system, along with revisions to the City Council chambers.. Fixed Camera This camera will be a flush mounted lens within the opposite wall from the City Council bench. This fixed camera will provide a still pan view of the City-Council. Since' the lens will be flush with the back wall, this camera will be very unobtrusive to the audience. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore -#13 ~ ,,~ The fixed camera will provide a still shot of the City Council while the other camera pans or rotates to the desired presentation. This will keep the viewing audience from getting "motion sickness" as the main camera pans to a presentation or to a speaker. . Rotating Camera This camera will be mounted to the bottom of the overhead beam which extends along the width of the Council Chambers. This camera is able to rotate 360 degrees with very little effort (refer to attachment 3). Staffhas chosen this camera due to it's miniature size, it's strong graphic capabilities, while remaining as unobtrusive as possible. This camera's small size (8" x 5' 1/8" diameter) and graphic quality make this option a good fit for the needs expressed. Video Control Cart This cart will we a small portable cart with the video control panel and miniature TV monitor to . indicate what is being broadcast. Electronic wall jacks will be available at all 3 walls (excluding behind the bench) such that the controls can be shifted around for the various uses within the room. LCD Projector The proposal included a cabinet with an LCD projector to be set at the right hand side of the room. This will allow scanned images, videos, or other electronic images to be projected on the existing . projector screen, while sending a video signal to the television audience. Presentations would be scanned in and shown through the LCD projector. One of the Ctiy's existing computers will be used as an interface to this machine. &~Q~~ . By shifting the staff table to the other side of the room, the podium and projector screen will be in'. one location for easier presentations by a guest speaker. . I will review the equipment in more detail at Monday night's City Council meeting in addition to the various operations of the equipment. . At one time, concerns were raised' about a small portion of the audience in the far back comer (stage left) not being able to view the projector screen. Although it is not part of~s proposal, there has been con~ideration to hanging a 32" TV monitor from the ceiling beam, to aid the audience for this area. At this time, staff is proposing that since the wiring for this monitor can be completed at very little expense, that the video cable and jacks be installed at this time. Once the system has been installed, the need for this monitor will be reevaluated at a later date ./ The remainder of the equipment has to do. with improving the audio quality' of the City Council meetings. This includes 7 gooseneck condenser microphones for the City Council bench, and 2 microphones for the.staff table, a new audio mixer and miscellaneous controls. MAR-I2IS-98 1217:52 P:12I2 TEL: . INVOICE ..mETONKA SOUND AND LIGHTIfG 1571 FINCH LN MOUND,MH. 553S4 75f1.1326 AFTER HRS: 472..fS232 Fax Number SHIP TO: SHORE\WOD CITY COUNCIL PER: LARRY BILL TO; FAX 474..()128 . KEITH JOHNSON ,., Oitteofooter 11-11-97 PREPAY3%iDlSC OR 1/2 ON 0stIiI order shIP~_._ FOe . .nt. 1627 ._ _ InllOiot!J dsIs . AMOUNT "'.00 l.034.ao ~OO ....00 249.00 3.....00 1:a,OO 1,199.00 539.00 ...00 1,100.00 300.00 4,800.00 PRICt: ~ 499.00 226.00 274.00 499.00 249.00 3,899.00 129.00 1,199.00 539.00 299.00 1,100.00 399.00 4,900.00 QTY. 1 9 2 1 1 CK FOR AUDIO EaUI~MeNT W/COVERS 1 PANASONIC WVC604 CAMERA W/AI.JT'O FOCU~ 1 ORTABLE CART FOR VIDEO EQUIPMENT 1 AJIIASONIC CONTROLLER FOR WVC&04 CAMERA 1 ELEX HAND HELD UHF WlFtELESS SYSTEM 1 IDEO MONITOR FOR CONTROl. PERSON 1 !XED VlOEO CAMERA FOH. fULL COUNCIL SHOT 1 SWJTCHER FOR SCENE CHANGES 1 PANASONtC COMPUTER LINK LCD PROJECTOR ORKS WITH POWER POINT SOFTWARE USTOM CART FOR LCD (OAK GRAIN) HEAD QUASAR VCR lL HARDWARE AND CABLE FOR ABOVE JOB 55 TRADE INS OF MICS ANO 2MIXERS . ~ ,3'16 PRE-PAY DISCOUNT . 170.00 329.00 1.585.00 (250.00 543.71 Sub tollll: r... ShIpping" IrMdIing: Pre~ amount owing: CnIdtt, You pay tin MIOCItlt. T."""., 5,5 20 va.- . Attachment 1 ~ ~ ~ :::- ~ ~ ..... ~ Rack mounted amplifier and microphone controls 7 Gooseneck microphones ~ II II II II II Video camera mounted to :: r existing beam. Camera & rotates 360 degrees II II II II II II II II 2 Gooseneck microphones 8Y (J{O ""'" ."-'SlON IlIICl'UMI CA:m fll' II, llN 'hlCI 1:14 rtI . Staff Table . Existing screen Video control cart with flush mounted camera lens in wall Cabinet with LCD pro jector CITY OF SHORE WOOD CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIO / VISUAL IMPROVMENTS . . aT't' M:...... IV DAft SHEfr 1 -- NO. \,.~z... t::JI --IIlA..- 'alMftr t::JI ...---1- Cl:lN-,. NO. . " ;=-+.~t:~S"~~."': _....., Product Integration of .DSP cameraparl':~A~!;;;;'}~~~~;" 1 Ox zoom lens, housing and receiver i~;e,~m~~~'. "C ,~ JJ\j.:i~j~ . ;.'~~'~~r-.::.,,'::",.~,'.. ~:' . . '..::-..~.-:. o ~.. D:i:l:i.iIf~;Q!",'rl~ Recer- ." ; :~1;' . r-...~, ~~~~;l1T;i:.~i~;; ." }-~ I I -- ..!'>...~. I \H~~ 0 v I ~nmft *.rtl/-CS604 Key Features . . .. .'.:. High Performance DSP Dome Camera) '64' Preset Po~itions plus Scen~File Selection (one .of ten avail~blity) . ~~,.MaXimG';;; '2400 lsecond Panning Speed ~. :... . -.. -. -' . . ',';-- '.. .Automatic Focus' .Built-in Digital Motion DeteCtor ._ .Digital Wide Dynamic Range .Electronic Sensitivity Up ~utomaticlManual ,Panning - ~.::~.'~:-': - .;~... L_ ,-,.'~-,' '..' ._ .-- .-. ;. ;,:.-:~:. .~-~::.,~..-.. Common Key Features .Compact (]) 5-1/8" ((]) 130 mm) ~ .3600 Endless Panning _a-line Horizontal Resolution dB SIN Ratio .Minimum Illumination of 3 lux (with Clear Dome Cover) .Intelligent Digital ATW .Digital Backlight Compensation ';:;:!ectr::mic Shutter: OFF. 1/120250. 50'0. 1000. 20('0 .:..ccc . COC'~ . :. (WV-CS604/WV-CS404) .Camera ID .Single Cable Connection Lens Portion .Zoom Ratio of 10 times (f=S-50 mm) .Angular Field of View: Horizontal 5.2' -52.3. Vertical 4.0'-39.7" .ALC/Manual Selectable Iris e Attachment 3 SYSTEM CHART _R~= o Max 128 Inputs Max 16 Outputs ODD DODD DODD DODD WV-cus5OA System ConlnlIIer Max 8 ConIRlIIet SPECIFICATIONS Functions of The Camera Pick-up Device Power Power Consumption Ambient Operating Temparature Ambient Operating Humidity Dimensions Weight Finish PiCk-up Method Scanning Video Out Synchronization I Resotution Pan Range Pan Range Set Pan Speed I Signal.to.Noise Ratio I Minimum Illumination Functions of The WV-c5604 Tilt Range nit Speed 8 WV-css04 ____ WV-CS404 Max 8 cameras . EXT. SYNC EXT, SYNC . OUT "IN . !<TW(witlrMlisk Function)" , .~ . ~~-,. set eaSedon1li8, ',' . EE~i'~ . ;~~if~~m~~~f,~~?g~~::: '. FunctiOns of The WV-c5604 and WV-c5404 STANDARD ACCESSORIES , Tnm Ring' . . . , . . . . .. . 1 pc. . Camera Mount Bracket . . . . . . 1 pc. .Connec'~rCase-"""" -1 pc. .ConneaorPin-' . .. .. . .. -4pcs. APPEARANCE OPTION l.nl '"" d~l ~l ~! -~"':-! NI ~, ~1 ]'112-{;190) '!i i;;' ai ,-t" ."V .;." @''';;; . ..- .. ~ ~:" ~f! r ,) '''' I . r ~ ,.:. I' , , ; '..,~;3/16"(;.51 Smoke Dome Cover WV-CS1S ,e 1.. ~ .,...,..,.... ~ ! fl;!.]I16"(R62.5J I ; 5olIS'{; 130) 3.5116"(83.5) UI1II: inches (mml . !. System Controller WV-CU151 Matrix System 500 WJ-SX550A WJ'AD550 WV-CU550A .~ ..~,.~:-:,'; ~'--~'::'?:t' . rU:S Panasonic DISTRIBUTED BY: eAII TV pictures are SImulated, eWeiqhlS and dimensions are approximate, eSpeclfications are subject to change WIthout notice. e These prodUCIS may be subject to export control regulations. . VSD.407I [02226.IJ (20kt Broadcast & Television Systems Company Division of Matsushita Electric Corporation of America IMAGING SYSTEMS DIVISION Executive Office: One Panasomc Way 3E. 7 ~ucus, New Jersey 07094 RegIonal Office Northeas:: ..n Hartz Way. Se>cauc:.;s N.,; 0~::S":' ,20~' 3..;8.-303 ~ ,~ut;;~CiS:: . 225 ~Jol1nhr0al'; ':::~rKW,}..: S:.:-::- ~ :~'..;.....;3.ne-~, G;" .:C ~ -..: , ~: ,~,~c-:;:; .~ . ~. . :"',..... " , .-"'"' .^' ..,.....-.-',....".... '.;,...:;..:i :'~ \~~ - , ~w1"\T3USHITA EL=C:T~IC ~F CANAC.'; UM1T::::) ';:-:--':- ...:;,,::~,.=,~:,;.:;_ ....t,~~.,.:~~'i:..:;.;_-=.':.y:: ~ . - ,_.~ ~- -:,- - -.- . . . . . Panasonic@ '111- PI" J System Controller WV-CU151 Controls Preset Position, Pan/Tilt, Camera Digital Function, Zoom Lens and Housing. The WV-CUlSl system controller, when combined with the WV-CS604, enables remote control of the various functions of the cameras, The WV-CS604 is a highly advanced unitized dome camera, features 64 presettable positions. speed of 240 degree per second panning, 360 degree endless panning, auto-focus lOx zoom lens, and progressive digital functions. \VV-CUlS1 allows for accurate control of the camera, \\-"V-CUlS1 also accepts the basic digital dome Key Features . Preset Control (only with WV-CS604l 64 positiDns ,posiliDn, focus, ZDom ratio,rotation mode, etc. · Lens Control r 1 Zoom ratio, focus. iris . uCallt:roller Set: lip .. . PanlTilt Control _ . _ " Manual Pan, Manual Tilt. Auto-pan, Random,pan . Housing ContrOl Wiper. Defrester. ,;lUX 1-2 ~Camera C0rtr':' ~':~n!.>::>!,,;1 \'\/-cs-+n~. C)L:f ba~~c ~ysrem consisting-oii)rH~ carne~;~ :lI:": Attachment 4 . .- ~.._- Panasonic~ 'J~ .- ,<, ;,.' .,,~." -,;-:~;'<"-'.':;::.:,,-..~;)... ~ DataPro Lite 292 ..........i...........:......................:.....:....Pl-..........E:...."2.......:..9........2............u. ,...'.'............ ..', ..-;.....--,:. -.' .'-, .--:>.... 20"-300" M~'ti0~~;~9q>~rgj~. _n"",,;;.:" ,,_'_, '-" -'. '-'. :. ~ - :.' ,-'''.."'',' - ,_.- .,'-".,-.......'-.<0.;.:-- Easy-to-Use Projector with Presentation Flexibility ...... .. · 832 x 624 Resolution for True SVGA Proiedion (XGA compatible*k!c, ,.... · 1.3-inch Polysilicon LCD Panel · Ultra-Compact & Light Weight for Go-Anywhere Portability · Bright 1,000 Lux (300 ANSI Lumens). · Compatibility with Six Color Systems and S- Video · XGA: compression mode ;--,,::>...,;.-.:..~..c.,.,.:c;; @ . Attachment 5 - . . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236 FAX (612) 474:0128. www.state.neVshorewood · cityhaU@shorewood.state.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council James Hunn, City Administrator !.any Brown, Director of Public Works ~. March 7, 1998 FROM: DATE: RE: Consideration of a Motion Regarding Audio Nisual Upgrades in the City Council Chambers During the various work sessions for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), there have been several discussions relating to how to improve presentations of reports in the City Council chambers, in addition improving presentations for the television audience. Over the last 6 months, sta!f has been working with Mr" Keith Johnson a consultant from Minnetonka Sound and Lighting regarding such improvements. Attachment -1 is 'the proposal provided by Mr. Johnson. One of the challenges of this task was to provide a method cif showing presentation boards or pictures to the television audience with enough detail to be informative about the yatious projects presented. The City Council may recall that previous proposals had been reviewed last year with cameras and'equipment ranging in the 30 to 45,000 dollar range. These previous proposal were cost prohibitive. The propo~ provided here is under the $ 22,000 budgeted in the CIP. " As a brief summary, the following is a description of the major components or-the system. Attachment 2 is a diagram- showing various components of the system, along with revisions to the City ,Council chambers. FIXed Camera This camera will be a flush mounted lens within the opposite wall from the City Council bench. This fixed camera will provide a still pan view of the City 'Council. Since' the lens will be flush with the back wall, this camera will be very unobtrusive to the audience. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore -#13 - The fixed camera will provide a still shot of the City Council while the other camera pans or rotates to the desired presentation. This will keep the viewing audience from getting "motion sickness" as the main camera pans to a presentation or to a speaker. . Rotating Camera This camera will be mounted to the bottom of the- overhead beam which extends along the width of the Council Chambers. This camera is able to rotate 360 degrees with very little effort (refer to attachment 3). Staffhas chosen this camera due to it's miniature size, it's strong graphic capabilities, while remaining as unobtrusive as possible. This camera's small size (8" x 51/8" diameter) and graphic quality make this option a good fit for the needs expressed. Video Control Cart This cart will we a small portable cart with the video control panel and miniature TV monitor to . indicate what is being broadcast. Electronic wall jacks will be available at all 3 walls (excluding behind the bench) such that the controls can be shifted around for the various uses within the room. LCD Projector The proposal included a cabinet with an LCD projector to be set at the right hand side of the room. This will allow scanned images, videos, or other electronic images to be projected on the existing . projector screen, while sending a video signal to the television audience. Presentations would be scanned in and shown through the LCD projector. One of the Ctiy's existing computers will be used as an interface to this machine. Room Changes By shifting the staff table to the other side of the room, the podium - and projector screen will be in one location for easier presentations by a guest speaker. ' . - /.~ At one time, concerns were raised about a small portion of the audience in the far back comer (stage left) not being able to view the projector screen. Although it is not part ofJ!Us proposal, there has been consideration to hanging a 32" TV monitor from the ceiling beam, to aid the audience for this area. At this time, staff is proposing that since the wiring for this monitor can be completed at very little expense, that the video cable and jacks be installed at this time. . Once the system .has been installed, the need for this monitor will be reevaluated at a later date The remainder of the equipment has to do with improving the audio quality of the City Council meetings. This includes 7 gooseneck condenser microphones for the City _ Council bench, and 2 microphones for the staff table, a new audio mixer and miscellaneous contro!s. . I will review the equipment in more detail at Monday night's City Council meeting in addition to the various operations of the equipment. . . . . . MAR-05-98 07:52 TEL: MNNETONICA SOUIID AND t.JGHTING 1571 FINCH LN MOUND.NIN. 553tU 759-1326 AFTER HRS: 412-6232 Fu Number SHIP TO: SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL PER: LARRY BILL TO: FAX 474-0128 KEITH JOHNSON ... Outeofotder 11-11-97 PREPA Y3%iDlSC OR 1/2 ON ~ ordf:r sh,pf!!J:d_._ FOe . .ht. InllOice dste Q'rY'. ESCRIPl10N 1 DfOMASTER 14 CHAN MIXER 9 uOlO TECHNICA POOIUM MICS W/SILENT GOO5NX 2 AREA MICS FOR ABOVE AUDIENCE 1 LEX uHF WIRELESS LAPEl.. MIC 1 CK FOR AUDIO eQUll-'MENT W/COVERS 1 ANASONIC WVC604 CAMERA W/AUTO FOCU::3 1 ORTABLE CART FOR VIDEO EQUIPMENT 1 ANASONIC CONTROLLE=:R FOR WVC604 CAMERA 1 EI.EX HAND HELD UHF WIRELESS SYSTEM 1 DEO MONITOR FOR CONTROL PERSON 1 V1oeO CAMfRA FOR I"UU. COUNCIL SHOT 1 SWlTCHeR FOR SCENE CHANGES 1 PANASONlC COMPUTER LINK LCD PROJECTOR WITH POWER POINT SOFTWARE sTOM CART FOR LCD (OAK GRAIN) HEAD QUASAR VCR lL HAROWARE AND CABLE FOR ABOVE JOB 55 TRADE INS OF MICS AND 2MIXER5 . ~ ~'MI PRE-PAY DISCOUNT PRICe I;ACH 499.00 226.00 274.00 <499.00 249.00 3.899.00 129.00 1,199.00 539.00 299.00 1.100.00 399.00 4,900.00 Tax I'IINI. 6.5 ShIpping & hwIdIing: Previoua iJI7IOUIW 0lIIIing: CredIt. You pay tIlia .mcJCUIt. P:02 INVOICE AMOUNT ....00 2.034.CO ,.00 ....00 2..00 s...DO 128.00 1,199.00 539.00 281.00 1,100.00 ..00 .,100.00 20 auo Attachment 1 ~ ~ f") :::to :: ~ - ~ Rack mounted amplifier and microphone controls 7 Gooseneck microphones .~ II II II II II Video camera mounted to : : r existing beam. Camera & rotates 360 degrees II II II II II II II II Existing screen Video control cart with flush mounted camera lens in wall 2 Gooseneck microphones " ellD lIE~$lOH llHCNJJl110 0\11:1 fE. II. 1111 1M: 1:1. PM . Staff Table . Cabinet with LCD pro jector CITY Of" SHOREWOOO CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIO / VISUAL IMPROVMENTS . . QN DA4'flN IV 00\1'1..., 1 -.. NO. ~t::1I -IliA- ~t::1I fIr---L- CHtQttD ,y. COlIII". NO. . .-,,--.:.- -- . ,. .- ";:7\h0:6"~~..:..:.., Product Integration of DSP camerapail~&':dl~~d'i?(:.~~;:;:"':'" "" ':,.0'.-, .' ..~~';:a:;~.'~';:'- .- 10x zoom lens, housing and receiver ine.s"'-"" ~_.. ". . }-\ I I ....J I ;,..~~ I \H~:~ng 0 v I ~~It *".. .WV-CS604 Key Features . JJIIJ/Iigh Perf.orm~nce DSP Dome CIlmera) ....64: Preset Positions plus SceneFile Selection (one ,of ten avail~blity) . ~~..MaXim~;;;'240o lsecond Panning Speed , .Automatic' FOCus' ..~~. .Suilt-in Digital Motion Detector .. .Digital Wide Dynamic Range .Electronic Sensitivity Up Automatic/Manual ,Panning . Common Key Features (WV-CS604/WV-CS404) . Y' eCompact <D 5-1/8" (<D 130 mm) e3600 Endless Panning .O-line Horizontal Resolution dB SIN Ratio eMinimum Illumination of 3 lux (with Clear Dome Cover) .Intelligent Digital ATW .Digital Backlight Compensation 'Eiectrcnic Shutter: Or=:=. 1/120250,500. iOOO. 2000. ~ccc ~ DOCe- eCamera ID eSingle Cable Connection Lens Portion eZoom Ratio of 10 times (f=5-50 mm) .Angular Field of View: Horizontal 5.2" -52.3" Vertical 4.0"-39.7" .ALC/Manual Selectable Iris . Attachment 3 SYSTEM CHART ""- 8 WV-CS604 WV-CS404 . Maxl28~ Computer RS-232C Port Max 16 VCR 0uq:lutS WV-CUS5OA System ConlRlIer Max 8 ConlIoIler SPECIFICATIONS Power Power Consumption Ambient Operating Temparature Ambient Operating Humidily Dimensions weight Finish Tilt Range Tilt Speed Func:tions of The Lens Focal LengIh Apet\ur8 - Iris Range Angular Field of V_ Functions of The Camera I Pick-up Device 1 Minimum Object Distance Iris Zooming Speed (Tole 10 Wide' Focus Speed Pick-up Method Scanning Focus Functions ot The Pan J Tilt Pan I Pan Range Pan Range Set Pan Speed Video Out Synchronization l Resotution i ! Signal-to-Noise Ratio Minimum Illumination Functions of The WV-CS604 8 WV-CS604 ~ WV-CS404. Max 8 cameras . Alann Out EXT. SYNC EXT, SYNC OUT ...IN . . Functions of The WV-<:s604 and WV..cs404 STANDARD ACCESSORIES . Tnm Ring' , . . . . . . . .. . 1 pc. . Camera Mount Btad<el ' . . . , . 1 pc, . ConnectOl Case. . . . . . . .1pc. .. Connecror Pin- . ". . . . . . . '4pcs. APPEARANCE OPTION I. Smoke Dome Cover I WV-cS1S I I 7.1/2'( .. 1901 ,,,.) ,o\.~/ ,f!J. . @,_'? ~ ~~ t'. i ~ -;-. ';. , , ;.'c'~"''' · ....,',. . ~". .. i;; ai 1.;;1 IMI -l ~! t!~! 3'5/16'(83.51 IJnlI : inclles imm) I . !. System Controller I WV-CU151 I I I I Matrix System 500 WJ-SX550A WJ-A0550 WV-cU550A Panasonic eAlI TV pictures are Simulated. eWeights and dimensions are approximate. eSpecilications are subject to change without notice. e These products may be subject to expolt control regulations. . VSO.4071 (02226.11 ,20kJ DISTRIBUTED BY: Broadcast & Television Systems Company Division of Matsushita Electric Corporation of America IMAGING SYSTEMS DIVISION Executive Office: One Panasomc Way 3E, ~ Secaucus, New Jersey 07094 RegIonal Office Nortneast: ..:1 Hat1z Way. S~cauct.;$ N... 07:9...,201 3~5.7303 :;:uthe;;.::;: . :25 ,'"JonnlJrom, ~~rk.wJ.'" S'.'_:,,-- - 'J,-- :=;"';..\-"':'1ne~. G;" :::- -.~ , .!,-:.....P",; - .. ":r.~ --:, ~:-.;.2C~I:C ~: -. '-.:::.:.i::.: '5:' ~.'1;"T3USHITA EL=CT~.IC OF C;"NACA L:~.1IiES ':--"'-~_~c;"'?r',>..,.-:; ~.k:': . . . . . ... Panasonic@ "rl- r" J System Controller WV-CU151 Controls Preset Position, Pan/Tilt, Camera Digital Function, Zoom Lens and Housing. The WV-CU151 system controller. when combined with the WV-CS604. enables remote control of the various functions of the cameras. The WV-CS604 is a highly advanced unitized dome camera. features 64 presettable positions. speed of 240 degree per second panning. 360 degree endless panning. auto-focus lOx zoom lens. and progressive digital functions. WV-CU15l allows for accurate control of the camera. \VV-CU151 also accepts the basic digital dome Key Features .Preset Control (only with WV-CS604) 64 positions ,position. focus. zoom ratio. rotation mode. etc. · Lens Control r l Zoom ratio. focus. iris .. Controller See 11'll .. . PanlTilt Control _ . _ c Manual Pan. Manual Till. Auto-pan. Random-pan .Housing Controi Wiper. Deiroster. AUX 1-2 '~Camera C.:;r;trr;! '::::~,_~r:1 Yt\.-CS-1.n-t. ():..lr basic 5ystem consisting of tHle ~~an~t~':-;::: ;:l~< :"":"';"'!"':= ,~,""~'."-- Attachment 4 1- ,... Panasonic@ 03 :?1.. ;:-. :.;,'~' ~ .~. DataPro Lite 292 :;,.J.PT.:.l292U:' 20"-300" MUtti~edratcq.~.~j. - ....__.c,...,...:..,-...... ~ ...., - .,' _' ". ,',- ce_,_,,, ., '.- "', "'" .--~ '_ ,.i' ' ;,',',;:"'i:,.', '.. . "'-" .'. ... ":'.r' .~. :-, .-- .>..-l.---.~. Easy-to-Use Projector with Presentation Flexibility .. . ... · 832 x 624 Resolution for True SVGA Proiection (XGA compatible*)..< · 1.3-inch Polysilicon LCD Panel · Ultra-Compact & Light Weight for Go-Anywhere Portability · Bright 1,000 Lux (300 ANSI Lumens). · Compatibility with Six Color Systems and S- Video · XGA: compression mode (f~~ . Attacllment 5 .-' Subject: dog poop Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 11 :42:23 -0600 From: Tom Dahlberg <dahlberg@member.com> Organization: NetGroup Systems To: Jim Hurm <cityhall@state.net> Jim, a resident called me to ask for a review of our dop droppings policy from an environmental point of view and from the standpoint of neighbor's dog's doing it on her property. Fair enough. Please make sure that we note this during staff reports next time. Thanks. -- . irl~ ----..... . ,--". . 03/02/98 16:49 FAX CITY OF MOUND ~002 Mound City Code Section 456:80 Section 456 - Resrnlation of Animals Section 456:00. General Prohibition. No person shall keep any dog, cat, horse, cattle, sheep, goat, or other animal in the City or permit such animal to be kept on premises owned, occupied, or controlled by him or her except under the condition prescribed by this Code. Section 456:05. manner. J'reatment. No person shall treat any animal in a cruel or inhumane Section 456:10. Animals at T .9r&e. No person shall permit any dog, cat, horse, mule, donkey, pony, cattle, sheep, goat, swine, rabbit, poultry, chicken, geese, duck, or turkey of which he or she is the owner, caretaker, or custodian to be at large within the City. Any such animal is deemed to be at large when it is off the premises owned or rented by the owner or his or her agent and not under restraint. An animal is "under restraint" if it is controlled by a leach not exceeding six feet in length, or at heel beside a competent person having custody of it within a vehicle being driven or parked on a public street or within the property limits of the owner's premises. An unattended animal on the property of another, without the consent of such property owner, is "at large" and not "under restraint" even thought it is on a leash. Section 456:15. Conimement - Fierce Animals. Every owner shall confine witbin a building or secure enclosure any fierce, dangerous, or vicious animal except when muzzled and in the control of a competent person. Section 456:20. Di~ Animals. Any animal with a contagioUS diseaSe shall be so confined that it cannot come within 50 feet of any public roadway or any place where animals belonging to or harbored by another person are kept. Section 456:25. Manner of Keepine. No person shall keep any animal in the City in an unsanitary place or condition or in a manner resulting in objectionable odors or in such a way as to constitute a nuisance or disturbance by reason of barking, howling, fighting, or other noise or in such a way as to permit the animal to annoy, injure, or endanger any person or property. Section 456:26. Leashine: and Feces Clean Up. Subd. 1. No person having the control of any dog or animal of the dog kind or animal described in Section 456: lO hereof shall permit the same to be on any unfenced area or lot abutting upon a street, public park, public place or upon any other private land without being effectively restrained from moving beyond such unfenced area or lot; nor shall any person having the custody or control of any such animal permit the same at any time to be on any street, public park, school ground or public place without being effectively restrained by chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length. 4-1-97 '---./- 03/02/98 16:50 FAX CITY OF MOUND ~003 Mound City Code Section 456:26, Subd. 2. Subd. 2. Any person having the custody or control of any dog or animal of the dog kind or animal described in Section 456: 10 hereof shall have the responsibility for cleaning up any feces of the animal and disposing of such feces in a sanitary manner. It shall furthermore be the duty of any person having custody or control of any such animal on or about any public place to have in such person's possession suitable equipment for the picking up, removal, and sanitary disposal of animal feces. For the purposes of this section, "public place" shall include any property open for public use or travel such as privately owned. parking lots for shopping centers or other areas where the public is invited or allowed on private property. Subd. 3. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the ownership or use of Seeing Eye dogs by blind persons or dogs used in police activities in this City, such as the canine corps or tracking dogs used by or with the permission of the City's police department. (ORD. #52-1991, 12-23-91) . .'-...--' Section 456:30. KeeDine: of Certain Animals Resrnlated. No person shall keep or harbor any horses, pigs, cattle, sheep, or goats in this City or permit the same to be done upon the premises owned, occupied, or controlled by him or her except under the conditions prescribed by this Code, and then only the same or lesser number of such animals kept or harbored upon such premises and under the ownership of such land as existed on May 19, 1960. Section 456:35. Stables and Barns - Location. No stables or barns in which sheep, goats, pigs, or swine are kept may be located within fifty feet of a place of human habitation. No live horse, cow, sheep, goat, pig, or chicken shall be kept in any shelter which forms a part of or adjoins any place of human habitation, and no such shelter shall be closer than 150 feet to any premises used for school, religious, or hospital purposes or to any establishment where food and lodging are served or furnished to the public. Section 456:40. Animal Shelters - Care of Premises. Subd. 1. Clean Shelters. Every structure and yard in which animals or fowl are . kept shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and free of all rodents, vermin, and objectionable odors. The interior walls; ceilings, floors, partitions, and appurtenances of any such structure shall be white-washed or painted as the Health Officer shall direct. Upon the complaint of an individual or otherwise, the Health Officer shall inspect such structure or yard and issue any such order as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Code. .'--...-/ 4-1-97 . . --..... ...--... 6124719160 CITY OF SPRING PARK 539 P02 MAR 02 '98 13:16 1989 CITY OF SPRING PARK SPRIlfG PAlUtt MIDESOTA- ORDINANCE NO. 23.03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 23.02 PROVIDING FOR THE' CLEAR-UP OF A1UMAL LITTER The City Council of the City of Spring Park ordains: SECTION I That Section X of Ordinance 23.02 be hereby amended by adding the following: 2. CLEANING UP LITTER . The owner of any dogt or any person baving ~he custody or control of any dog shall be responsible for the clean up and disposal of any animal defecation on either public or private property; City sidewalks or parks. SECTION II EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRING PARK THIS 7t"ll. DAY OF ~t , 1989. APPROVED: /S/ Jerome P. Rockvamt MAYOR ATTEST: /.s/ Pat:ric;ia ~SOI'I ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK/TREASukER .. .----".-..-. ~--..........".....-,~_.._..., -..,.._...~_.. 03/02/1998 12:07 6124717416 MTKABCH PAGE 01 Minnetonka Beach City Code (8) Restraint of Dogs. No person owning, keeping or harboring any dog shall allow same to run at large within the City. It is hereby made a duty of c~ery owner or possessor of any dog to keep same on hislher premises. unless restrained by cb.aia or le~ not exceeding six (6)feet while ojfthe owners premises, or within a vehicle being driven or parked on a public street. ,---,. (9) Fierce Dogs. (A) Definition. Upon evidence that a dog while off the owner's premises has bitten a human being, has attacked another dog or domestic animal or has rushed at, chased or jumped upon a person, that dog shaD. be considered fierce, dangerous and vicious and in the future will be required to be leashed or chained while on the owners premises. (B) RemoYal. Upon evidence that a dog has been allowed to run ~L1: large after a violation of Section 21S (9)(A) or has committed a second offense of biting a human being. attacking another dog or domestic animal, has rushed at, chased or jumped upon a person, that dog sb.a11 be removed :from the City. . (10) Certain Animals Prohibited as Public Nuisances; Ahatement or ~Jlisance; Notice; Violatio.... .,,-.-..---. ~ ~ '3 .. !!t =i ~ z S. (ll "---'- . - (A) NniK.. No person shall own. k.eep or harbor any animal which by loud and frequeat barking, howling or yelping shall unreasonably cause noise., disturbance or annoyance to persons residing in the vicinity the;reof lhe phrase l'unreasonably cause noise, disturbance or annoyance" includes but is not limited to the creation of noise by an animal which c;m be heard from a location outside of the premises where the animal is being kept and which occurs continually with a thirty (30) second or less lapse of time between each animal noise (i) during a twenty minute or longer period between the hours of7 a.m. to 10 p.m. or (ii) during a t~ minute or longer period between 10 p.Jn. to 7 8.m. ; provided however that the animal is not being unreasonably provoked by persons or An1m91~ on or near the premises. The phrase ''unreasonably provokedll includes but is not timited to the fonowing occurring on or near the premises where the animal is being kept: (I) one or more persons in a vehicle :parked or idling, (ii) persons teasing the an;ma.1, (ill) the presence ofunrestraiD.ed dogs or other anirnal~. (iv) utility employees perfurming UDl'ec;[Uested work and (v) persons oouhlJitLing vandalism or criminal acts. . ..... (b -..j .... (B) Oesn UIJ. No owner shall permit hislher dog to damage or :fuu1 any lawn., garden or other property. An owner shall have the resp011.SlDility for cleaning up any feces of the animal and to dispose of such feces in a sanitary mannex'. . Page 47 MAR-02-1998 12:09 CITY OF EXCELSIOR 612 474 6300 P.01 -. h. Molests passersby or pass.nS vehicles; or i. Causes fouling of the air by odors. Subd. 5. License Required. No dog ower shall keep any dog over three months of age except a recognized guide or seeing-eye dog kept for a blind person within the corporate'limits of t is municipality unless a license therefore has been first secured. Subd. 6. Interference with Officers. It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to break open the pound or to at empt to do so, or to take or let any dog taken by him in compliance with thi ordinance or in any manner to interfere with or hinder such officer i the discharge of his duties under this ordinance. .'-" Subd.7. Offenses Involving Tags. It is unlawful to counterfeit or to attempt to counterfeit the tags provide for in Section 430:10 of this ordinance to take from any dog a tag le ally placed upon it by its owner with the intent to place it upon another dog or to place such tag upon another dog. Subd. 8. Tags not Transferable. Dog ags are not transferable and no refunds shall be made on any dog licens fee because of leaving the municipality or death of the dog before the expiration of the license. $ubd. 9. Vaccination. No license sha 1 be granted for a dog which has not been vaccinated aglnst rabies as provid d in this Section within a period of two years preceding the application for a license. Vaccination shall be performed only by a doctor qualified to practice veterinary medicine in the state in which the dog is vaccinated. veterinarian who vaccinates a dog to be licensed in this municipality shall omplete in triplicate a Certification of Vaccination. One copy shall be issu d to the dog owner for affixing to the license application, one shall be sent 0 the Minnesota State Livestock Sanitary Board. and one copy shall be r tained in the veterinarian's files. Subd.10. Removal of Excrement. It is unlawful for any owner of a dog: 1. To permit that dog to be on an property. public or private. not owned or possessed by such owner. unless such owner has in hiS/her immediate possession a device for the removal of excre- ment and depository for the tr nsmissio~of excrement to a proper receptacle located upon proper y owned or possessed by owner of said dog; or 2. To fail to remove excrement le t by such dog to a proper recep~ tacle located on property owne or possessed by owner of said dog. " . . , ,~....--. The provisions of this section shall no apply to the ownership or use of seeing-eye dogs by blind persons, or s; .larly trained assist dogs used by handicap personst dogs when used in pol; e activities by the City, or traCking dogs when used by or with the permissio of the City. 'Subd. 11. Violation of this Section. 'olation of any subdivision of Section 430:05 is a petty offense governedlDy Or inance No. 157, adopted by City Council 11/19/84. ". TOTAL P.01 <; Mar-Ol-98 11:S8P P.Ol or custodian to prevent his animals from committing an act of nuisance shall subject the owner or custodian to the penalty hereinafter provided. The phrase 'to bark excessively, continuously or untimely' includes, but is not limited to, the creation of any noise by any dog which can be heard by any person, including a law enforcement officer or animal control officer, from a location outside of the building or premises where the dog is being kept and which noise occurs repeatedly over at least a five-minute period of,time with one minute or less lapse of time between each animal noise during the five minute period. **subd. 2 Doc Feces. Any person having the custody or control of any dog shall have the responsibility for cleaning up any feces of the dog and disposing of said feces in a sanitary manner. It shall furthermore be the duty of any person having custody or control of any dog on a public property or on the private property of another to have in said person's possession suitable equipment for the picking up, removal and sanitary disposal of feces. . .* subd. 3 Animals in Bathinq Area. It shall be unlawful for any owner or custodian to allow any animal, including but not limited to dogs, cats and horses, in or on any public beach, public swimming area, or public park. 5741.06 Impoundment Unrestrained dogs may be taken by any officer as hereinbefore defined and impounded in an animal shelter and there confined in a humane manner. Impounded dogs shall be kept for not less than five regular business days unless reclaimed pri~r to that time by their owner as provided hereafter. 5741.07 Notice of Impoundment Within twenty-four (24) hours after taking a dog into custody. the animal supervisor shall. if the animal has an official tag. leave at the address . --- .. Amended July 9,1996 32 " . CKNO 22540 22541 22542 22543 22544 22545 22546 22547 22548 22549 22550 22551 22552 22553 22554 22555 22556 22557 22558 22559 22560 22561 22562 22563 22564 22565 22566 22567 22568 22569 22570 22571 22572 22573 22574 22575 22576 22577 22578 22579 22580 . CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MARCH 9, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE FEBRUARY 23, 1998 TO WHOM ISSUED US POSTMASTER LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS RICHARD C. JENSON MIDWEST COCA-COLA DAHLHEIMER DIST. INC. DAY DISTRIBUTING HONEYWELL PROTECTION SRV LEEF BROS. MARLIN'S TRUCKING QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS PERA MEDICA HEALTH PARTNERS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE UNUM LIFE INSURANCE AFSCME COUNCIL 14 CITY OF TONKA BAY GRIFFIN COMPANIES TOWLE REAL ESTATE ~ ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION ANOKA CO SUPPORT/COLLECT AFSCMECOUNCIL 14 MN DEPT OF REVENUE ARMOR LOCK & ALARM KATHLEEN HEBERT JOSEPH LUGOWSKI NORTHERN STATES POWER JOSEPH PAZANDAK ALAN ROLEK REBECCA TARVIN UNIVERSITY OF MN US WEST WASTE MANAGEMENT BRIAN FREDRICKSON DONALD/APRIL GREENWOOD BELLBOY CORP. PURFa3E MARCH NEWSLEITER POSTAGE LMC DIRECTORIES (2) JANUARY SAC COMPUTER MAlNT. AGREEMENT REFUND DBL PMT-FINAL BILL MISC PURCHASE BEER PURCHASE BEERMISC PURCHASES QTRL Y MONITORING-LIQ I MATS FRBGHT L1QUOR/WINE PURCHASES MARCH PERA UFE INSURANCE MARCH HEALTH INSURANCE MARCH HEALTH INSURANCE MARCH DENTAL INSURANCE MARCH DISABIUTY MARCH LIFE INSURANCE MARCH DELTA DENTAL MARCH RENT-TB L1Q MARCH RENT -LIQ I MARCH RENT -LIQ II PERA. DEFERREDCOMP . PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID MARCH UNION DUES STATE TAX WITHHELD SYSTEM MAINT/QTRL Y MONITOR MILEAGE/SEC 1-25 REIMB SEC 125 REIMB UTILITIES MILEAGE SEC 125 REIMB MILEAGElEXP. TREE INSP. DAVISlLUGOWSKI COMMUNICATIONS WASTE REMOVAL ABATEMENT S/A 29-43-29 REFUND WA BAL.-FINAL BILL UQUOR PURCHASES AMOUNT $551.07 61.64 990.00 1,175.00 55.35 210.60 200.00 2,080.27 83.07 26.20 124.80 1,485.42 45.00 5,223.75 3,188.06 587.02 94.50 89.60 224.00 1,000.00 7,618.50 3,590.45 2,976.49 1,373.07 929.00 1 56.50 145.25 1,333.41 245.64 226.43 171.31 2,737.48 65.16 200.00 10.24 170.00 1,213.20 221.08 565.44 108.27 4,146.98 Page 1 . . CKNO 22581 22582 22583 22584 22585 22586 22587 22588 22589 22590 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MARCH 9, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE FEBRUARY 23, 1998 TO WHOM ISSUED BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY GTE DIRECTORIES GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO LAKE REGION VENDING PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS THE WINE COMPANY WORLD CLASS WINES, INC PURFa3E SUPPL YIMISC PURCHASES ADVERTISING L1QUORIWINElMISC PURCHASES L1QUORIWINElBEER PURCHASES MISC PURCHASES WINElBEER PURCHASES L1QUORIWINE PURCHASES L1QUORIWINE PURCHASES WINE PURCHASE WINE PURCHASES TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED Page 2 AMOUNT $881.41 56.85 14,289.02 9,255.93 1,289.28 707.01 9,126.19 1,458.19 388.75 233.56 CI"j"Y ()F SHORE WOOD Ct'iECK APF)f~OVAL_ LIS"i" FOf~ MAR~ 9~ J.998 CDUNC.iL M'!'(~ Cl~ECKW VENDOR NAME DESCRIFJ"I"I(JN DEP"!"x AMOUN"j" ------..-- -.-.-.-.--.-.-.-----------.-.------ .__._--~-----_.__._._--------- -------- ----------- 22591 CSUS FOUNDATION. INC. ~3 i,I\,1 ,/ 1/.,1 A ,"1 f::{ r"'i lJ r':~L. ~.:) SEi"n:.f':'? DE 22592 CHAN}~ASSEN LAWN AND SPUR'i" I'OOLS Tf:'::EE i'1AI 22593 t'iARMON GLASS & GLAZING E: (J i) .1 i:) f'''l ~1 .l i"'~ T CiTY Gr-~P 22594 DR.ISKIl..~'S SUPER, VALU COOK.IES--PK COM~1 OPEN FOR PARKS & 22595 ENG.INE PAR"I"S SlJPPLY CO f~ (J tJ L ;~) - ""J r:~ .I j-"1 T CITY GAh' 22596 ENG.INEE~RING REPRO SYS""EMS SLJPPLIES CITY GAP SlJF)~)1._1 t:S Fj L P: i""~ r"~ I j'-...J (;i *** TOTAL FOP ENGINEEPING PEPPO SY .,:;,?".,(;)7 .<:-.- ,.' , E-l RECYCLING INC~ FEB RECYCLING CONTRACT h:ECYCL 1 j'-J 225~~8 FIMA FL.EE'" FiJEl.ING FLJE~L. C: I T\( (;~f;;{F< Fl.J!::L ~~~ 'J'O"'AL f()R f.INA FL~~E'!' l~ijE!._.iNG .,),/ ,I ~Z~2,::)(1~~ F.I h:~:; .,. f:{h~ Es [i i....~ i) j- C, t: 0 i,c\,if:=~ 'j' f::M: CI~::, E~C!i"'.{l) l~~: i':: :::: ~~~ , ,,,.:... '..... dOj".lD F !:: t: ::) :;((::\(~ TOT{lL .... r.......' ','" '~ ."..r'. ... ... ."" j- t..J t.t;: j....1. t.t.~::':'~ I f~'{ rf;: ~ h'" "'.. .'" ~:~lft:+ '. 1.)1._.1 22600 (~LOBAL EQUIPMEN'" S}..t()F} SlJ~Jr.:)J_JE~3 [:1 T"\l (;~f-"=~h: 2260J. G(lVERNMEN'I' 'l'RAINING SVC 98 MCMA/MACA CONF-HURM ADi"Jli'-i 226C1.:2 HENNEPIN COUNTY TPEASUPEP 1 !~';S/~3 T(lX BOCW./F ICHE j"lUN BLDG .r.....'... ..t.:bl.)~ F)f-~h:}<:. ~:J L..::'~ r"'~ r',,~ !:~. F: !:'J~={h:}<.S ~( HOISINGTON/KOEGLER GPOUP ;". r.. ; .'~ ;. L.~-t.t.,I.)(.1 HOPKINS PAPTS COMPANY E. GJlJ 1 i~~} r'''l~-:~ I r",~ "j' CITY r.. ... ...... f0r1t--< 6C' M (JCt 6.5l '" ::,2 'l6S'..8~5 25.52 .150.:L? t~t:l ... 5..:+ ..:+ ... ~2(:~ 6t~ ,. ~3() t:f '1 S';2() ... ()() ':::!t=,J._:.Il~Z .1.:, ~ f~() 16~Z .. CI';) r.. ;' ~ ..... ~.. .L~): C:'l ,. I.~} I.,} 2 .1 ,'!:.} ,. () () 65.12 /.l.t9() :.I-b'::! .1 " ,., ,..., I..}~.....) / S' () () - ..~Z.:) 2;, ~5 .. t<Z SHOP SUPPLIES CITY GAR 8.1.67 . *** TOTAL FOR HOPKiNS PARTS COMPAN 115.29 ~2 2 ,~, () .::1 1 f'''~ r'~ () \/ f#~ T .l \l f.: I,^.I:::~ Ft::!~ 1.. r".H:.~ S Y S T E i~"l f:: (4 lot .1 F) f"f f; 1 r".l T C1 T Y Gr;P 22606 KAP PPODUCTS Sf"HJi~) SUPPL I t:. ~3 CITY Gf":Jf.:.? 22607 LEAGUE OF MN Cl.t'lES INS '1' SHORE WOOD VS SWI'J'Z CLAIM MUN SLOG 22608 MAR"'IN~ JAMES AM COMPUTEP CONSULTING f'lUN bLOG 22(;'109 ME'I'RO WES1' INSPEC'j.ION SVC SLDG INSPEC"'IONSSYC-FEB PRO'f INS 22610 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. FINAL ~M'I'-MANOR ~)K LO'i' 226.11. (}FF_i(~E~~ l)f~PO'!' fjFF I :3lJ [.J f.J L. .1 l:~: ~:; l~E:i"'~ -(~(J'v T 12 A"l'&'!' W.IRELESS SERV.lCES f::~ I h: l I f"'lE: ~:~ ,~: \",'-1::. F< [) t: .'. ~' .-., .,. " ;-..~ .L ~'< \ J :::: 1") (~j. j'-'.iE. r=: f? Page 3 5()2:! w I:l~:J 13 () .. t5.::t .S ",~l..:l 43.1.2:::. :!: () () '" I:) () 340 M 2:..1. . 98.29 12... ():~: ..~) ~;.. .. ~;" s::~ ."- ...., '. ',,"'~-' ~ c.r.j'y OF SHOREWOOD (:t"iECK AfJPROVAL LIS.!. F:OR !Y'RK~ 9~ 1998 COUNCIL M'!"G C~1ECK4 VEND()R NAME DESCR.IP'!:!()N Ut:~!,~ AMOUN'!. '-'--'-'--'-- .--.--.--.---.--.---------.-.----- -.------.-.------.-----.--...-.- -------- -.-.---------' (~ I P T I i"jE (~I h:T .l ,"IE **~ .,'o.rAL FOR A'!.&l. W.iRELESS SERYIC 22613 MN S.i.A.i'E '!"REASURER EMISSION "fES'i"ING 22614 MN SUN PlJBLI(:A.'.I()NS t_ 1:: t~f;L.A[) ~z ~z t~ .1.::! '''I I j....{ j"",! E~ t~ f~:~ S C: (J i)T It_I TIE:::> LiT 1L.l T IE.S UTILITIES lJT .ILl T .Ifi~S . UTILITIE~) UTIL.ITIE::) LiT ILL T IE~3 L'.i.l.L..I "i' IE:::) UTILITIE3 ,,~A:".-\" i'(Jl:~~L. F(Jh: r....i.Ii"...{r...{E.t~f-~~::.;c:CJ 22616 WM,~ MUELLER & SONS~ .INC~ SAND 22611 NAVARRE ."RUE VALUE J::s t_ [) (;~ i....! r; .1 f".~ T SlJF)FIL.1 [.S ~~~ .~.O.i'AL FOR NAVARRE 'I.RlJE VALUE ..... ~". , .. r.. .,L L t~~ ..1 l~:$ r'.' "' 11'" l.. L_ F: /', ~ ~~< HOO'v'ES PE T J f':{ f",{ / F t: t3 f~./ c ...- .J r:;~ r",~ .1 r"l F) (} Li f"{ lJ S !~.'{.,'Jlhl-', , ""....'.:, 226J.9 P!()NEER RIM & WHEEL. E au I P r"j{~ I i'..j T 22620 PO'I.'f'S, KENNETI~ N~ LEGAL-FORFEiTURES ."""'J '."". ..' SEf;'~\/ 1 C:f::~ T IF< E Fd:: P A lf~: RED WING~S MOBIL 22622 ROLLINS OIL CO. UIL ,~( SUPPLIES 22t/13 SEARS COMMERCIAL CF-;EDI T Siylf~l_L. TOOLS 22624 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES FEB JANITORIAL 1/30-2/13 w/!~ SUPRV~ *** TOTAL FOP SENIOR COMMUNITY SER 22625 SHORE WOOD TREE SERVICE TREE TRIMMING/HAULING 22626 SHOPE WOOD TRUE VALUE SUPPLIES i~~) F~: () T .1 r",~~) F:l L. r~ f",{ t..~! .1 ,',4 (;~ .1.1 /::,/ '4 ~5 ~z C:_1 T\(! (;~f;;~f.:c~ (;~ E~ j""~ (~ () \l T "... .,.......... ,....... 1,I','fn1 ! j:::t~: Llt::-. I,;',i f;;~ T E: F< [) ,:: L I QUUF; I/,} f;. .!. !::: f;'~ [) E. C1 TY Gr.~+: i~ f;Fr~ r-::. ~) t~{ ;"jur...j bLDG L. I (}lJC)F: L_ I ~~Jl.JC)f~ .., .." .n '." '-, "', '~'.. ',"~'. ".. -................... '4 '..,....,. ~:; j'..{ Ci i/',i l~( 1 i"'''1 LJ r'..! f3 L. [) G~ c~ 1 T \( l"~ r-H'~: F)F:().l' INS 2.::1 '4 .~:l ~S .::!t, '"' .1/.{. 1 t, :4 ()() ... .... -, ...' ..L ,L C" ,. .:'J~:" (1:'5 :4 ~5 .::) .l (", ~~, /.;/ '.;'.:: .w ..~. ,~ .J......- .,. ,. ."...,,;.... 111.12 .1 (13'4 ():5 t,~!:2 w.t~~2 ... .... ". ... "'. ...L 10,.;1.:=; '"' ...L t5 180.2J. 6'9.21 8l ,~ () .:::f .:~! .S~ E~ :~ ~Z:~ :Zt:.':o .18 /~. "" Cl..:~f....... '22,,14 1~5Ct.. ~51 6t1 '4 ~:./l+ r~l.. ()() ~...... .n .... L~t '4 .:'::11.) l..}'.3, M ~~ J. 22(),. t~2:1 23().~. ()() :~.:'().... ()() s/()() .'4. ()() 8.22 22627 'i'.iME SAVER OFF S.1'i.E ~~~ COUNCIL M.I.G MINU:I.ES GEN GOV'i' 227:025 PLAN COMMMINUTES PLANNING 195.25 ~** 'l.a'!'AL FOR l'IME SAVE~ OFf SI"!'E 422...50 ~~:~t,2~3 .j.ONKA AU.I.O AND BODY SUPP SLJF)Pf_lES ? .~.?6 .'.? t) .'.ClNKA PRl~.~-J-lNG (:O~ j"....t E~ c: }..! f;::~ f'.,~ I C: ;~\ L. .'-'. .... .-.-.'- . ~. .,' J.~) t: l'...:t""!.J.. I F': (J hI f'''l ~3 ~~ .~~: (;, ~s () i/.} ~ V,,: ... ..... ._. .- ., "....H' _d. t.~ t.< :~.~ !. j."~ 1, .~~ L:: ;.( 'j ;'.Jr. ." .". .... .... ',. .. .' ~.'.. ,... '. ..,.P" ::. :~,~ j.... i~:: J Y .1 I. t.: r-.l :::. Page 4 ~.'- r T \' l.. ..' , ( G~f~h: PF<.or'~ SER C:.l .,. \( (;~ f:~ F~~ l~ 1 T \( t~~f4K r'. I...">,/ ... A I , G(~P IyjUN 6LDG F)f~h:k.~) l~ I.lt:~() '" Cl() T Fr~EE: tyli~ T Cl T'..,' (~f;;~F< C'T "'V .~ I , G:-;;~P !.~) FHJ I .1 i~.~ ::) .:::: I T \~t t;{ F{ ~.,:' ..L .. t::> t:.' i 51 _4 ()() . CI"i"YOF SHORE WOOD CI~ECK A~)PROVALLIS-i' FClR MAR~ 9~ 1998 COUNCIL M"'"G (:t'iECK~ VENI)(:}R NAME [)ESCRIP"!"ION DEP'i'~ AMOUN"i" ._.__.____._.._ .___._.__.._.___.__._____._.__..__~___ ___._____________________ _______._M _.___._.___.__.__ :3i"'i:'~LL TOOLS *%* "!"O"!"AL FOR w~w~ GRAiNGER, INC 22631 ZlEGLER~ .iNC~ E:~ Cf lJ .I FJ j....! r-'~{ .1 fl..{ T (:.l "j' \( G~f'';1F< . "'l . A ...l":)' .. c;~~j 1...J. I '( G(~h' 22632 MN COUN'l'IE~S INS~ 'l"PUS'!" 98DRUG/ALCHOL "I"ES"j" HEMS --------- .'.....N"""... TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL ~\<::i( ;\< TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST . . Page 5 .1.:::! :~ .::1 /1 ,~ :?~2 98,956.66 .:)::Z ,.. t:~~Z .... .... .,'" ::,!I.....I"... .:::l{) ... ........- ..... .... ~L L':),., '.j t..} .. C H E C K R , G - S T , i: CHECK CHECK E!1PLQYEE NAME CHECK CHECK ! ! ~~ DATE NUM8ER NUMEER AMDUNI COM 3 03 98 109 EMILY G EHSiYR 212727 15.01 COM " 03 98 110 CGHNIE u. BASTYR 212i28 LL':'.~ts "'"" < 03 98 115 LAWRENCE H. BRGWN 212729 t,ur. l:Ll.!~ COM 3 03 98 37:' AHGELH M. COLE 212730 331.89 ~~ COM 3 IJ:' 98 500 t.t1H!'tL!:.~ , DAVIS 212731 i":'!.!.L COM ~ 03 98 775 JAMES C. EAKINS Ll.!.!::,t, 714.96 COi1 ~ 03 98 810 MICHAEL R. rl!:.L!J~ 212733 SU. ;9 COM 3 03 98 1145 AMY L. GRAHN 212734 5'.72 COM j 03 98 1160 TWILA R. GROUT !.lk!~~ 531. 03 COM 3 03 98 1190 KATHLEEN H. HEEERT 212736 e/'1.V~ COM 3 03 98 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 212737 523.61 COM 3 03 98 1410 PAMELA j, HELLING '1'17";; 560.04 ~-~,.)~ COM 3 03 98 1430 KELLY M. !1t!'1I'.:t~ 212739 1!~.!1J COM 3 iJ':': 98 1550 .'jj/olP~ C. HURM 212741j 1817.41 J",,~w COM 3 03 98 1575 TROY i'!. IVES 212741 ... ,., 4~..!: .COM 3 03 98 1601 BRIAN D. JH!H:L 212742 191.75 COM 3 03 98 1675 UROS J;'; irir LIL!4;'; 189.89 ~ ............'" COM 3 03 '1t1 1700 JEffRE'f ii. JENSEN 212744 905.08 COM 3 03 98 1800 ..>'N"T::' D. JOHNSiJii 212745 898.87 w~..l'!.~ COM 3 03 98 1840 PAUL H. jOHNSOH 212746 53.56 COM 3 03 98 2100 WILLIAM F JOSEPHSON 212747 629.1.5 COM 3 03 Q~ 2270 JOHN I. KOPISCHKE 212748 52.18 ,ll COM 3 03 98 2500 SUSAN M. I ...~~,,~~ 212749 639.48 .R l ! t.!H~trt COM .) 03 98 2800 '~~~il" P LUGOjrjSKI 212750 ~. ~ .. JU:lt. 11 ;jt)..,.c~ CGf1 3 03 98 2805 JASON R. LUND, 212751 241. 71 COM 3 03 98 2938 DANIEL J. MCDONALD '1'";' 36.48 .......1.... COM 3 03 98 3000 THERESA L. NAAS 212753 633.22 ^~/ol 3 03 ':f~ 3100 LAWRENCE ii. NICCUM 212754 1151.34 l,U.. CUM 3 03 98 3400 BRAOLE'f J. NiELSEN 212755 904.90 COM 3 03 98 3435 ANDREW c. onEN 212756 158.23 CIi/ol 3 03 98 3500 JOSEPH E. PAlANDAK ~1~";1 lll6.if ~" L.LI.. COn 3 03 98 3580 CHRISiOPHER J. POUNDER 212758 867.71 . COil 3 03 98 3595 i'lAiiHEfi C. RAODE 212759 135.88 COi'! 3 03 98 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 212760 994.80 COi'! 3 03 98 3701 BRIAN il. ROERICK 212761 25.41 COM 3 03 Q~ 3710 DONALD J. ROGERS 212762 98.42 ,ll COli 3 03 98 3800 ALAN J. ROlEK 212763 1150.63 COM 3 03 98 3815 MICHAEL J. RUfFENACH 212164 286.84 COil 3 03 98 3825 JOHN E. SAYER ,.~" .. 110.55 ...L!/Q~ COM 3 03 98 3850 HlNYA 11. SCHIERIlAN 212166 19l.41 COM 3 03 98 3900 CHRISiOPHER E. SCHMID 212767 436.84 COn 3 03 98 3910 R CONRAD SCHIlIO 212168 43.53 COi'! 3 03 Q~ 4050 BERNARD J. ~\'n"U!Ht ~.~.. Q 148. 73 .ll LiLlO. COi'l 3 03 98 4200 BRENDA l. SMITH 212110 104.58 COM 3 03 98 4575 REBECCA A. iARVIN 212771 187. SO COi'l 3 03 98 4750 RALPH A. iiEHLE 2127i2 650.69 COM 3 03 98 4Qi1,j DEAN H. YOUNG 212173 35.31 ,.. ../ COMPUTER CHECKS MANUAL CHECKS 22128.76 NOTICES Of DEFOSiT .00 .00 ....TGiALSi:t:: ................, ..., .::.~i.C~. !b Page 6