020998 CC Reg AgP
"", '.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY', 1'98
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7 :00 P.M.
B. Review Agenda
C. City Council Annual Review and Acceptance of Statement of Purpose,
Statement of Goals and Statement of City Values (Att.-#IC Documents) ...
2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mayor DahIberg_
Stover __
McCarty _
O'Neill
GarfunkeI
A. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes January 21,1998 (Att...f2A
Minutes)
B. City. Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 26, 1998 (Att.-#2B
Minutes)
3 . REPORT BY MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ON OPEN FORUM
MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 27, 1998 REGARDING
SNOWMOBILES ON THE LRT TRAIL (Att.-#3 Comment Sheets and
Letters Received)
4. CONSENT AGENDA.. Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda &: Adopt
Resolutions Therein:
A. A Motion Setting the Second Council Meeting in May on May26
B. A Motion Approving the Request to Allow the Annual Norwest Half
Marathon to Traverse the City on May 3, 1998 (Att.-#4B Letter of Request)
C. A Motion Establishing the Spring Clean Up Date at May 16, 1998
s. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
6 . PARKS .. Report by.. Representative
A. Report on January 28, 1998 Meeting (Att.-#6A Draft Minutes)
B. A Motion Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement for Professional
Market Research Services (Att.4#6B Proposed Agreement)
-
E
....
a\
~
~
~
t1
~
<
Q
Z
~
"
<
=3.
tJN
~~
00
tJ~
t:~
O~ ~
1
.'
tit
.!
~ ~
i I~
J <~
I t"
~ ~l5
i~. ~l~
j 0111 ~~~
Q.. ~ 5Z~
~ ~ ~~]
l J~ <<g.
..c< ~PQ::
I ~~i ~~~
~O<<t oz~
~ sa::: t-t0-<
· 'i~ ~~i
~ ~! b~
~ ~~8
s: tJ~~
.
co
~
~!i
~.~
P=
~:i
=~
i~2 -a
< .g Vol bO ~
o =' ~.~ ~
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
8~i ~ ~ n ~ ~
0$ 8. f: ~ ff ~ ~
~o~ < 8- J 0
<~g'I E-4 - ..c< Z ~
" "'f fI.) ~ \U P t"'"
~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 E-4
!~ ~ c::: ~ t) tJ
~~~ ~ ~ ~ E r:;
~~~.~ i ~ ~ ~
m:;9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z05 i ~ ~
8~Q ~ .( ai ~ ~
..-..
N
-
~
t::
-<
'-'
!
..
'"
.
<:I>
.....
. .
.... ~
.... ....
.,;. .....,
Plannill/J Commission
Meetill/J Notes
February 3, 1998
iI.
The meeting on January 19,1998 was cancelled therefore we had a fairly lengthy agenda on
February 3, 1998.
I. Simple Subdivision, Clint Carlson. Mr. Carlson's lot is in R I C. He is subdividing it into
two lots. There was some discussion about the dedication of the street right of way and
easements for utilities and driveways. No concerns were noted and the subdivision was
approved unanimously subject to staff recommendations.
2. Public Hearing, preliminary plat, Mary Lake Addition. This lot is zoned R-IC but is
surrounded by fairly large lots similar to this one. This item has been tabled several times
since it first was heard in September. The primary concerns expressed by the commission
centered around the significant drainage issues on the site. It slopes sharply down from
Minnetonka Drive to Mary Lake and has a small wetland on the western edge where water
collects in the spring. Neighbors expressed concern regarding the potential for increased
drainage resulting from the development in addition to their overall concern that the
subdivision would detract from the character of the neighborhood. The owner has attempted to
address most of the concerns. The subdivision was approved subject to staff recommendations
and the engineering recommendations.
3. Water's Edge POO, proposed grading plan. This PUD was approved a year ago, however
the owner of one of the lots wants to do some grading in the wetland conservation area and has
agreed to restore foliage and plants where they were previously removed along the shoreline.
As the wetland area is larger than is normally required, it was felt this change would be an
improvement in the lot. The request was approved unanimously.
4. Discussion regarding a moratorium on communication facilities. Discussion focused on the
need for and purpose of a moratorium. AT&T representatives were in the audience. They are
planning to submit a request for a site within the next six months. It was agreed that a
moratoriums would allow the city to:
. review existing sites to identify which ones would be best suited for this type of use.
. hold public hearings to obtain public input on these sites and resident concerns,
. develop guidelines for the ordinance with respect to requirements such as setbacks,
maintenance, appearance and other issues which the city may feel need to be outlined
in advance.
It was recofll1l1ended that the moratorium be in effect until the review was completed or up to
six months which ever was less. AT&T representatives were comfortable with this approach.
Two commissioners, Paula and Pat expressed concern that the moratorium was too long.
5. 1998 Planning Commission Projects: The planning commission has a very heavy schedule
for 1998. We are planning to address the following issues: variances, comprehensive plan
review, communication facilities, adult uses, PUDs, subdivision ordinance, senior housing, tree
preservation plan, flood plain regulations, home occupation regulations and green space
acquisition. In February, March and April we will focus on variances, PUD's and the
Comprehensive Plan changes, Communications facilities and we will begin our review of adult
02104/98
1
. "-,
Planning Commission
Meetill/J Notes
February 3, 1998
uses. The planning commission is holding an extra meeting in February to try to complete
these reviews.
Matters from the floor: several residents (senior citizens) from Club Lane expressed confusion
and frustration with the fact that they are not allowed to re-zone their one acre lots. They are in an
R-IA zoning district, but are finding that the lots are too big for them to manage. They were
referred back to city staff to learn more about the zoning laws and what options are available for
them.
02/04/98
2
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
James Hurm, City Administrator
~
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director. of Public Works
DATE:
February 9 1998
RE:
LRT Signage for Snowmobiles
At your request, I have researched the costs to manufacture two signs to be posted at each end of
the LRT corridor. The information provided stated that the signs are to be 4' by 8' each and are to
state the following:
WARNING
Entering Shorewood Regional Trail
Snowmobile Regulations Strictly Enforced
Violation of the law can result in
· Fines (Up to $700)
. Arrests (Up to 90 days in jail)
. Impoundment of snowmobile
Signs are to be multicolored; for example, a red background with white lettering. The following is a
summary of the total costs for the project
2 signs X $24S/ea
Power auger rental
2 Public Works Personnel X 3 Hours
Total
= $490.00
= $ 95.00
= $ 124.68
= $ 709.68
As an alternative recommendation, I would suggest reducing the size to a 4' X 4' sign, versus a
4' X 8' sign. Although it is desirable to make the sign as noticeable as possible, a sign this large is a
greater target for graffiti artists.. Although nothing prevents these enterprising artists from placing
their handiwork on a smaller sign, a 4' by 8' sheet tends to be too great of an opportunity to pass up
for these individuals.
HENNEPIN PARKS
;~
!/~ ~ cG @11 WI ~~.~~.i.i..l
'Ill I F~B "
I~ u t 0 1998 I'!
L By= _ I
Memorandum
February 4, 1998
TO: Jim Hunn, Administrator, City of Shorewood
FROM: Karen Bowen, Director of Operations, Hennepin Parks
SUBJ: Southwest Regional LRT Trail Corridor Use
Jim, following our telephone discussion yesterday, I double-checked the issue you raised
regarding winter horseback riding on the LR T trail within the City of Shorewood. As you
well know, Hennepin Parks prohibits horses on any section of the trail between Mid-March
and Mid-November. After discussion, department heads and Superintendent Doug Bryant
concurred with my response to you that horses are prohibited throughout the year to protect
the trail surface.
oh 1/memos98\jhunnlrt
.
-J.
t
..
~
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD" SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927" (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128" www.state.netlshorewood" cityhal/@shorewood.state.net
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Meeting
Monday, February 9, 1998
Agenda Item #1 C: The Council could by motion accept the Statement of Purpose, the Statement
of Goals, and the Statement of City Values. The only item to change as a result of the work
sessions, is the Statement of Expectations, which is part of the goal statement.
Agenda Item #3: Because open forums are not recorded, it is important for members of the City
Council to relay at a regular Council meeting what they heard discussed at the open forum.
Attached in the packet is a copy of the written communications received before, during and
after the open forum for residents along the LRT trail. After each member of the Council has
summarized what they heard at the open forum and what was received in writing, they should
give further direction to staff.
Agenda Item #4A: The second Council meeting in May falls on Memorial Day. A motion would
be in order to change that meeting to Tuesday, May 26. The Park Commission would then
need to change its meeting to Wednesday, May 27, should one be necessary that week.
Agenda Item #4B: This action item would be a motion to approve the annual Norwest Half
Marathon which is to take place on May 3, 1998.
Agenda Item #4C: This motion would establish the annual spring clean up date as Saturday,
May 16, 1998. This is the week end after Mother's Day and the Fishing Opener.
Agenda Item #6B: This action item would be a motion approving an agreement for professional
services with Decisions Resources Inc. to take a telephone survey within Shorewood
regarding trail and park issues. This was recommended unanimously by the Park
Commission.
Agenda Item #7: In order to allow time to study the zoning map to determine appropriate sites
and regulations for cellular antennae within the City, the Planning Commission recommends
adopting a moratorium for up to six months.
t'\ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
...
Agenda Item #8: The Senior Community Services have asked that south shore city councils pass
a resolution supporting the continued support of our senior programs by the use of
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funds.
Agenda Item #9: The utilities have been installed for the Marsh Pointe subdivision and have
been tested to insure conformance with the specifications. It is recommended that the
sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer within the public right of way or easements
dedicated to the City be accepted for the City's perpetual maintenance.
.
.
" ..
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
This Statement is a point of reference for all decisions and actions of
Shorewood City Officials and Employees.
Statement of Purpose: To provide a value in municipal services, to assure compliance
with community laws and standards, and to keep citizens informed of those services, laws
and standards.
Statement of Goals: The City Council has adopted Organizational goals (attached) and
Comprehensive Plan goals (being reviewed).
Statement of Expectations: To accomplish our goals we must strive to provide a
focused direction for Shorewood which is in compliance with the values and the goals of
the people of Shorewood. In doing so we must serve in an impartial fashion, be open,
accurate, patient and courteous, and take pride in the job we do.
City Council Action:
10/28/91
2/24/92
3/10/93
1/10/94
1/23/95
1/22/96
5/13/96
Approved
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
- .,
<Cfi~ <o>(f ~fu<O>lf<e~<nxOOl
(Q)~ftfi<O>IDaill CG<IDmIl
To be recognized by Shore wood citizens as a model of good government
by:
.
1. Providing a value in high quality services. Service excellence
will be achieved by respecting employees as the City's greatest
assets, and as team members with a shared vision of increasing
productivity and accountability.
2.
Serving in such an efficient, friendly manner that residents
feel good about being citizens of the Shorewood community;
continuously striving to keep citizens informed and asking for
and listen to feedback; and utilizing "user friendly" municipal
systems, processes and documents. Association with the City,
in any capacity, should be as enjoyable and focused as possible.
.
3 . Working closely with other governmental jurisdictions as well
as the private and non-profit sectors. to effectively address
south Lake Minnetonka area issues and City goals.
4. Maintaining policies, plans and procedures which will secure
financial stability for all City funds.
4/8/96, Reviewed by City Counci15/13/96
.'-.
~I8I<D)m.IEW(Q)(Q)llD <CJIlI')Y \V J.lITalD1E~
The Shorewood City Council in its governing role, is responsible for setting policies for
the City, which are implemented by the Administrator and City employees. Furthermore,
the Administrator, employees, and City Commissions propose overall goals, specific
objectives, service levels, and action plans for Council consideration and direction.
This "team" makes decisions and acts based on a strong set of values. The team values are:
.
. A strong sense of commitment to the City and its Statement of Purpose.
. Open, democratic government, enhanced by an informed populace.
. Responsiveness to the needs and desires of the citizens; public service.
. Fair and equal interpretation and enforcement of City Codes.
. A reputation for dependability and integrity.
. Teamwork. and action oriented problem solving (acting rather than reacting).
. Striving for improved productivity and efficiency through new technology and
innovation.
. :J?mployee selection by merit.
. Professional development.
. . Respect for City employees who, with fair treatment, proper training, and a
willingness to let them excel, will take pride in associatioh with the City and
serve the people well.
. The provision of accurate, timely information to the City Council, through proper
channels, so the best possible decisions C3Il be made.
. Adherence to professional, ethical standards of conduct.
. ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council on Monday, March 9, 1992.
City Council Action:
3/10/93 Reviewed
1/10/94 Reviewed
1/23/95 Reviewed
1/22196 Reviewed
5/13/96 Reviewed
. " '"
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
WORK SESSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1998
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
Jennifer McCarty, acknowledging the Mayor's absense due to a Police Coordinating Committee
meeting, called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Councilmembers McCarty, O'Neill and Garfunkel; and Administrator Hurm. Mayor
Dahlberg arrived at 7:50 p.m.
Absent:
Councilmember Stover.
.
3.
REVIEW OF ISSUES
A . City Values
B . Statement of Purpose
C . Organizational Goals
These issues were briefly reviewed. There was no further discussion.
D . Communications Plan
The Communications Plan was reviewed. There was general consensus that the Communications Plan
is being implemented well. The members of the City Council are receiving very few calls on the voice
mail system. It was determined that the system for Council members should be abandoned and callers
should be given the home numbers of the Council members.
.
4. ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES FOR 1998
The Mayor arrived at 7:50 p.m. following general discussion on City Council priorities. There was
general concurrence that the following prioritis should be established for the City Council for this year:
eVlse ater policy - ordinance
Review standards for subdivisions and streets, including curb and gutter
Review stormwater management plan
Complete review of Comprehensive Plan
Monitor liquor operations closely
4t;iA
a <I.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 1998 - PAGE 2
Review and revise trail plan
Review transportation plan, with emphasis on Country Club Road/Y ellowstone
TraillLake Linden area
Consider options to facilitate the purchase of green space
Sanitary sewer - review III strategies, re-evaluate strategies to reduce sewer rates,
and re-evaluate the sump pump inspection ordinance
specific areas such as the Minnewashta
Review and revise personnel policy handbook
Develop a strategy to improve paramedic rescue response times
During the discussion, Mayor Dahlberg raised the question of neighborhood association development.
He asked the question, "Could we divide the City into neighborhoods of mutual interest or policy .
areas 1"
There was consensus that the question of developing neighborhood associations should be a separate
work session topic.
There was discussion on whether or not Shorewood residents should be surveyed regarding various
policy questions. Again it was determined that this could be a separate work session topic.
Councilmember O'Neill stated that he feels that work sessions and Council meetings should begin at
7:00 p.m. rather than 7:30 p.m. This will be placed on a City Council meeting agenda for
consideration by the entire Council.
Finally, it was determined that a quarterly review of the City Council priorities should be made in
Council work session rather than at a regular Council meeting.
5. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further discussion, McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded, to adjourn the .
meeting at 8:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDA Y, JANUARY 26, 1998
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
D ~1Ab~T
1.
Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers McCarty, O'Neill and UartunKel; i"\.Ullllllldu....~&
Hurm; City Attorney John Dean; Engineer Brown; Planning Director Nielsen
Councilmember Stover
Absent:
B.
Review Agenda
. Mayor Dahlberg read the Agenda for January 26, 1998. He requested under Item D that action be
taken only with respect to the City Council Priorities for 1998 and the Review and Acceptance of
the Statement of Purpose, Statement of Goals and Statement of City Values be discussed at the
next work session meeting. The agenda was then approved as amended.
C . Presentation of Plaques to Commission Members
Mayor Dahlberg announced plaques will be presented to Planning Commissioner Pisula for five
years of service on the Commission and to Planning Commissioner Foust for four years of service
on the Commission. He expressed his appreciation to Commissioners Pisula and Foust for their
contributions to the City.
D. City Council Review and Acceptance of Statement of Purpose,
Statement of Goals, Statement of City Values and City Council
Priorities for 1998
.
McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded accepting the City Council Priorities for 1998.
Motion passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes - January 12, 1998
Dahlberg moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the City Council Executive
Session Meeting Minutes for January 12, 1998, as submitted. Motion passed 3/0.
(Councilmember O'Neill abstained.)
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - January 12, 1998
Garfunkel moved, McCarty seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes for January 12, 1998, as submitted. Motion passed 3/0.
(Councilmember O'Neill abstained.)
#";2.5
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 26, 1998 - PAGE 2
3. CONSENT AGENDA
McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded approving the Motions on the Consent Agenda
and adopting the Resolution therein:
A. A Motion to Approve Change Order No. 2 for Project No. 95-19
Shady Island Bridge
B. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-007, "A Resolution
Modifying the Protective Covenants for Marsh Pointe for Lundgren
Brothers, Marsh Pointe"
Motion passed 4/0.
4. MA TTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None
5 . PARK - Report by Representative
Report by Commissioner Dan Puzak on January 13, 1998 Park
Commission Meeting
Commissioner Puzak reported on the matters considered and actions taken by the Park
Commission at their meeting of January 13, 1998 (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
A.
.
B . A Resolution Making Appointments to the Park Commission for 1998
Dahlberg moved, McCarty seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-008, "A
Resolution Making Appointments to the Park Commission for 1998." Motion
passed 4/0.
6. PLANNING - Report by Representative
Councilmember O'Neill noted his agreement with the Planning Commission that both entrance and
exit points be on County Road 19. Planning Director Nielsen stated the County is responsible for
issuing a permit in this regard. The County has indicated their preference would be to have one
driveway on County Road 19, even if it were to be made somewhat wider. The County also
indicated if the City feels strongly there should be two entrances in this area, they would probably
support that recommendation. .
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 26, 1998 - PAGE 3
Dennis Pipkorn was in attendance along with Brian Pipkorn and William Asp. Mr. Pipkorn stated
he would prefer two access points off of County Road 19 rather than one access from County
Road 19 and the other from Wood Duck Circle.
Engineer Brown expressed concern relative to increased commercial traffic on Wood Duck Circle.
Mr. Pipkorn felt this issue had been addressed by changing the exit onto Wood Duck Circle. The
exit was narrowed and has a sharper turn. Mr. Pipkorn did not feel large trucks would be able to
maneuver this exit.
Engineer Brown was concerned there may be drivers who would attempt to utilize this exit. In
addition, he expressed concern a subsequent owner may not have the same. intentions as the
applicant relative to the operation of a commercial facility on this site.
.
Commissioner Borkon noted the feeling of the Commission that it would be best for the Council to
send a strong recommendation to the County to keep the two access points on County Road 19 and
close the Wood Duck Circle access. This also reflects the compromise which was.reached between
the Planning Commission and the Shorewood Nursery.
O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact
Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shorewood Nursery Renovation for
Brian Pipkorn, Akorn Services, Inc., 23505 Smith town Road. Motion passed
4/0.
B . A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit
for Bank Facility with Drive- Thru
Applicant:
Location:
Bayside Financial Corporation
23780 State Highway 7
O'Neill moved, McCarty seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-009, "A
Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Bank Facility with Drive-
Thru for Bayside Financial Corporation, 23780 State Highway 7." Motion passed
4/0.
.
C.
A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Final Plan of Water's
Edge P.U.D.
Applicant:
Location:
Bill Blegens
20295 Manor Road
Nielsen explained there are two issues on the final plan which should be noted and reviewed. He
stated the applicant is proposing private wells in this development. He felt this to be consistent
with the direction of the Council relative to the issue of water. Nielsen explained the applicant
proposes some minor grading into the conservation easement. This grading is supported by staff,
however, he recommended this matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for their
reVIew.
The consensus of the Council was to refer this matter back to the Planning Commission for their
revIew.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 26, 1998- PAGE 4
D . A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact Regarding a
Conditional Use Permit for Special Home Occupation
Applicant: James Bruce
Location: 5755 Merry Lane
O'Neill moved, McCarty seconded directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact
regarding a Conditional Use Permit for Special Home Occupation for James
Bruce, 5755 Merry Lane. Motion passed 4/0.
Mr. Bruce was in attendance and Nielsen explained this matter will come before the Council on
February 9, 1998, for final approval as a resolution.
7. CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS REGARDING ANIMAL CONTROL
SERVICES
A . A Motion to Approve a Contract with City of Orono for Animal
Control Services
McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded approving a Contract with the City or Orono .
for Animal Control Services. Motion passed 4/0.
B . A Motion to Approve a Contract with Paws, Claws and Hooves for
Animal Boarding Services
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded approving a contract with Paws, Claws and
Hooves for Animal Boarding Services. Motion passed 4/0.
8. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS
A . Staff Report on Development Monitoring
Nielsen reported inquiry will be made of the Watershed District as to whether the restoration. of the
north end of the wetland area has been completed according to their specifications.
B.
.
Planner's Report on Agreement with Northwest Associates for
Housing Study Services
Nielsen reported approximately 16 communities have joined together to apply for a planning grant
to complete a housing profIle for the lake area. The grant has been obtained and a consultant has
been hired to complete a subregional profile including demographics, household characteristics and
employment, identification of housing issues and evaluation of the need for various types of
housing in the lake area. Ultimately an action plan will be established to include programs and
activities which various cities could choose from in implementing their own specific housing plans.
It is anticipated this work will be completed by mid to late March.
9. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember O'Neill raised the issue of green space and inquired as to the status of this issue.
Administrator Hurm stated he will be meeting with the financial consultant who will provide
. background materials on various programs which may be of interest to the City.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 26, 1998 - PAGE 5
Attorney Dean stated that relative to the issue of green space, the City would have to have some
ownership type interest in a property whether it is an easement, right of use, or fee title. Without
that type of interest, public funds could not be expended for an activity. He felt a public interest
which would give rise to the expenditure of the funds could be relatively minor in nature and
fleeting in time. The property could be acquired and then reconveyed.
A. Consideration of moving City Council Meeting and Work Session
Starting Times from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Councilmember O'Neill was in favor of moving the start time of City Council Meetings and Work
Sessions to 7:00 p.m. Mayor Dahlberg felt this would be a positive change in that anyone wishing
to address the Council during Matters from the Floor would be able to do so at an earlier time.
O'Neill moved, McCarty seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 98-010, "A
Resolution Moving the City Council Meeting and Work Session Starting Times
from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m." Motion passed 4/0.
B . Concurrence on City Council Work Session Dates - February through
June
.
It was agreed the work session currently scheduled for February 24, 1998, will be changed to
February 25, 1998. The consensus of the Council was to accept the calendar of Work Session
dates for the months of February through June as amended.
11. ADJOURNMENT
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded adjourning the meeting at 8:29 p.m. subject
to the approval of claims. Motion passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl WaIIat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc., Inc.
.
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
.
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Snowmobile Costs
2/6/98
* Snowmobile purchased in 1996 at a cost of $6,970; Cost depreciated over
5 years with a salvage value of $3,000
** Expenditure includes end of 1996 and all of 1997; 1998 not yet available
.
.
.
Re:
Residents owning propertY witbin 300' either side of the center line of the LRT trail were
invited to the open forum held on Tuesday ,January 21 regarding snowmohile use on the
LRT trail.
snowmobile Open Forum
~~
From:
Mayor and City Council
Teri Naab, Executive SecretarY I DeJl1lfy Clerk
To:
Date:
February 5, 1998
AttaChed yOU will find the sign up sheet from the meeting which 54 residents signed.
Twelve of those attending left a comment sheCt, eight of which expressed their oJ.'J"'Sition
to the sport and foor their soJl1"'rt to continue to allow snowmobiles on the trail.
In response to the notice sent out about the open forum. we received tbifteCn written 0<
verbal communications about snowmobiling. Six of those conununications were oJ'l'osed
to continued use in Shorewood and seven were in favo< of it.
All comments have been attached fo< yoU! revieW.
.
.
~
"f~
.
.
.
.
~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
DATE:
January 26, 1998
Includes Data Gathered as of 1/19/98
Jim Hurm
Becky Tarvin
Mid-season Update on
Snowmobile Monitoring
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Snowmobile Complaints
City Hall
From November 1, 1997 to January 20, 1998, five residents had called in to City Hall with
concerns regarding snowmobiling. The following summarizes these concerns received at City
Hall:
-Three residents concerned about snowmobiles trespassing. Public Works was
contacted and hay bales were placed on property.
-One resident called in regarding concern about limited patrolling on trail, lack of obedience
to law, and trespass concerns.
-One resident called in regarding dog almost being hit while walking on trail, concern about
snowmobiles not slowing speed when near pedestrian (self), and curfew violation.
In November there were 13 total 911 call-in's. Of these resident call-ins:
-All 13 were preseason violations .
-One was regarding a trespass violation
-One was regarding a violation of riding in a city park.
In December there were two 911 call-ins. Of these:
-One was curfew violation (00:08:01)
-One was a trespass violation
SLMPSD Reports
The police department must be contacted to obtain their ICR reports. This action has not been
completed yet.
Since the snowmobile season began in earnest one week ago, the following violations occurred
on the LRT:
Speeding: 15 tickets, 8 warnings
Registration violations: 2 tickets, 3 warnings
Curfew: 4 tickets, 2 warnings (parties were stopped at 10:00 p.m.)
Safety certificate: 1 ticket
False information to police officer: 1 person arrested
Other Agencies
An end-of-season report will be requested from any other agencies (Hennepin Parks, DNR
Conservation Officer). No information is available at this time.
Trail Monitoring Activity
City Staff has scheduled 10 hours of trail walks at random hours. The following information from
the first five hours of trail walks is available:
Saturday, Dec. 13
Snowmobile tracks were visible. Additional
sign age was needed at Freeman Park. No
snowmobiles were seen on trail.
7-8 p.m.
Saturday, Dec. 20
Saturday, Dec. 27
Saturday, Jan. 10
No monitoring conducted. No snow on trail.
8-9 p.m.
10-11 a.m. No monitoring conducted. No snow on trail.
7-8 p.m.
_50 temperature. No activity on trail. Some snow
was on trail. Many track marks had been made.
200 temperature. 20 snowmobiles viewed. Excellent
trail conditions. Of 9 perceived violations, 4 were no
stop; 4 were against traffic, wrong side of road; and 1
was perceived speeding.
Sunday, Jan. 18
4:30 - 5:30
p.m.
Communications
2 mailings to registered snowmobile owners in the 55331 zip code were conducted. The first
mailing in late November included the City of Shorewood Snowmobile Regulations information
sheet. In the second mailing, a State of Minnesota New Regulations information sheet was sent
out with the City information sheet.
Three press releases have been published: sent for publication on 11/2/97 - Snowmobile
Safety Training in Shorewood; sent for publication on 12/8197 - Review of City Ordinance; and,
sent for publication on 12/23/97 - Review of City Code and DUI Offenses.
The Citizen Informer has also published articles regarding the use of snowmobiles within the City
in the November, December and January issues.
Signage on LRT
New signs were placed on the LRT Trail this year. From early November to November 31 , signs
stating "NO SNOWMOBILING UNTIL DEC. 1" were at four major entry points to the LRT trail.
On December 1, those signs were removed and replaced with 18" x 24" standard "SPEED LIMIT
20" signs, with a smaller sign stating the speed limit reduced to 10 mph within a pedestrian.
Other signs containing the City of Shorewood Regulations, No Trespassing Wetlands and No
Snowmobiling in City Parks Were also posted for the winter season.
J'
.
.
.
.
t
.
.
.
.
MetnOl"andutn
JanuarY 27, 1995
Ope1l1'..... ~ ~ JoC"I"1on tb< LR'I
Mayor Dahlberg
Snowtnobi\eS on the LR1'
, " C"tY ~ lilllllupD.
CitY ~ ~ Co.......... pad<S Co=""01l, I
Cit)' Engineer LarrY Brown
Date:
'1'0".
frotn:
Re".
, Ii ' aI tb< LR'I 'I\lO P"'I"'" of thiS
'Ibau1< Jon {of ~ our c;ooodl Ope1l1'o"",, !<"~- ~tb< ~ caI' ~ in ~ witll
"""'" is to ~ ""'" 1 bcli<"e to "" tb< ""'" ........ --.
sno~obUing on me LR'1'.
,d ~et~' 1 \)e1ie'I< in ~g
1l)' tb< _,1 ba'/< 11<"'" .",...,a. ~~~ a:::\1O'ol<d fo' anotb<' "'" of sno""""biIiog on
wann. As' oJllIlO' of {aCt, 000< of tb< COU"""-
tb< LR'I QWO . sn()WlOOl>ile 0' ~CII""" UI tb< sport.
CC:
~
LR'I' tb<,..nstical estin""" and it,.ggests tbat tb<
. 'I\lO ooIJ obje<:IiY< esti- of safetY on tb< 15 oti~"""S pets- 1'0< J.e - being tile<" is no
~ we ba'/<..,daY _ "" safet- Jour 'f"';' tb< baSis of safetY'
objeetNe rouI< to ~ ........bilUIg on tb< ~ 't caI' ",,'let'! ~ _t<ed witJIOUl.
. If safetY is tb< oNLY -. t\l<I< 15 little ~ t
_on~ " _,,,,,,- t\l<Oweba'/<not\)eeO..,kiOgtb<
. If noise ot ~ 15' tcaI """'=, ot petbaP" l' ~..,.,apoiolo tb< ~ ba'/<
p",gtess we sJtoo\d ba'/< \)eeO roaJOOg on tbal ftOOI- ....
~ tb< ~ ' ,r' alon tb< LR'I _bOtb tb< Son_obile
. If ~ilin!\ is' ~le 0tJtSl0"" to, ~ ;~Jon tbal thiS is not tb< c;ase and
'Ias\< 1'0"",, and tb< c;ooodlwUl want to tCV15' e
e~\ore ways of mitigating it.
._t. ' tIl I {OO, in sniPPing tb< citY of \t' s
I, ... Q1t01icipal_ on ~on tb< LR'I tnigbl =-~ UI e ong
rigb.t to regulate the activit)' at aU.
in ~ ~g on tb< LR'I, alte'
1 \)e\ie"e tbal~ tnigbl ~ lo't: ~ clubS woo1d ba'/<'cb>O"" of ~
",bien tb< p1ll<. tb< c;auotY, tb< ".,usttY, an eon' fltl\1e' _ citY, ",gulauoOS, 'I\lO LR'I 15 tb<
soo.-biIe uaftie to tb< LR'I und<' pllR ."dlo~ ~;" La\<< WOOC'"oka- Iligbl ""'" tb< CCUnlY 1nfOS
tDl\iO' ~ ftoUI tb< ,.,ntb UI genotal and Cat" e tigblto ",guIal< all adi.1l1 00 tb< ttai1, But
tb< ttai1 0'1<' to ~ each """'"', II"""!l os ~~..- tbal' """Ie .... ~n to ",gobUI"g tb<
S~ doCS not _ tIl~ LR'I, and .w::,15 no ''::-... bJ ..,..usn< aPP"""'" on our part. 'I\lO c;auotY
uai1 ~ ",ooId not be ",ggeted and IU....J...,...,.-" liu OS
and pllR will not"" able to fiI1i\ . sIJtIiSlicaI ""'0 {of tcJ"""'lI p" 0 '
2, 'I\lO qualitY of life'-' fot all tb< pe<>Ple u.in!I,uoogtb< LR'I,b3S pIt>I>abIJ - ~ bJ tile
tnOst vocal activists.
j
The major tactical error of the most vocal opponents of snowmobiling on the LRT has been to substitute
the safety issue for what I believe is the more immediate and substantial issue for those residing along the
LRT - the nuisance factor. They seem to believe that only the safety issue has the power to actually shut
snowmobiling down on the LRT. Therefore it has been all too tempting, tactically, to work almost
exclusively on the safety issue, instead of the nuisance issue, in order to achieve the goal of a total ban.
One reason why the most vocal activists may have chosen to emphasize safety, to the detriment of a more
careful consideration of the nuisance factor, is that the Snowmobile Task Force arrived at the conclusion
that noise and property damage problems were not substantial. If that's not true, we should revisit the
question of noise and property damage, measure it, and develop a serious civil engineering perspective on
it.
So far, substituting the safety issue for the noise or nuisance issue has not worked. And I don't believe it
will work in the future. If the safety issue were clear enough. it could and would be dealt with decisively.
But if the local safety issue is not well defined statistically, and is nevertheless substituted for the nuisance
issue, it can only result in fruitlessly distracting attention from what is likely to be of most concern to most
of the people in close proximity to the LRT.
(a) The Council cannot make rational social policy based on purely subjective estimates of safety.
.
.
It has not, and will not further the goal of shuttW.g down snowmobiling on the LRT to offer subjective
estimates and WlVerified observations of the safety of mixed use on the trail. In fact it is oerfectlv obvious
that the obiective measure of safety is inevitably based on the accumulation of statistics over a long oeriod
of time. But as soon as this is admitted it becomes a problem for the policy of banning snowmobiling on
the basis of the safety issue alone. Statistically, walking the trail in wintertime appears to be safer than
your neighbor's pets. For the period of 1987 (when our police department started keeping records) through
1997
. There is not a single snowmobile accident report on record
(There is one "ice boat" accident recorded under the SnowmobileIRV category.)
. There are 33 accidents involving bikes
. There are 18 boating accidents
. There are 19 injurious falls
. There are 142 dog bites
. There are 30 cat bites
Ifbanning snowmobiles on the trail means moving them onto the streets on their way to Lake Minnetonka,
it may result in a much more intense risk than we face now. Banning them altogether, cutting off any hope
of access to Lake Minnetonka from the south for snowmobilers (we have few places to trailer snowmobiles
and park cars) brings us back once again to the triggering of a policy crisis for the region, the DNR, and the
county, the outcome of which is unpredictable.
.
.
The only objective estimate of safety on the LRT is the statistical estimate, and it suggests that the venue
we have today is safer than strolling by your neighbor's pets.
Does any of this mean that I think that snowmobiles and pedestrians traveling the trail together is an
absolutely safe combination? Of course not.
But it stands to reason that with the low speed limits and enforcement, the risk may actually be decreasing.
In any event, the statistics are not good news for alarmists.
We all know from the news reports that snowmobiling can prove dangerous for stupid snowmobilers and
unwary pedestrians, and only strict vigilance will keep it safe in Shorewood. I believe in that vigilance
along with stiff penalties for violations.
1.
.
.
.
.
~
(b) What would the threshold be for banning snowmobiling from the LRT on the basis of the safety
issue?
A further difficulty in simply banning snowmobiling is that there is no agreed upon threshold of incidents
that would imply that the activity should end. Incidents occur every year in a host of sporting activities
which are not banned by municipalities, state governments, or sporting associations because no one
believes that any sporting activity can, even in principle, be made perfectly safe. Mixing pedestrians and
bicycles is recognizably risky, but an implicit policy of bicycling and walking at your own risk is obviously
prevailing. Perhaps it shouldn't Some may argue that walking the trail during bicycle season is an
unnecessarily anxious experience.
What is the safety threshold for shutting an activity down? If, hypothetically, the objective probability of a
fatal accident on the LRT during the winter is one every 200 years, that accident could nevertheless occur
tomorrow. But what would it mean? That the present mixed-use arrangement is more dangerous than
mixing high-speed bicycles, without speed limits, and pedestrians during the sununer? The objective
probability of a fatality occurring under mixed bicycle and pedestrian use is, for all we know, one every
100 years, and that, too, could happen this year. There is a great deal we don't know. But what we do
know does not favor a ban if safety is the only issue.
Common sense tells us that mixed use of the trail should alwavs be a safety concern and should be
regulated. But there is no clear agreement, perhaps because there is no clear method for creatillg it, about
the percentage of violations, or absolute number of violations, which implies a ban. In principle, if
speeding alone, depending upon the extent olU, was universally agreed to be a good reason for shutting
down byways because it is a blatantly unsafe thing to do, we would certainly have shut down many of our
roads a long time ago. In almost any context, government regulation cannot assure both freedom and
security if even a single individual decides to behave irresponsibly.
(c) The safety issue, in any event, may be easy to resolve.
Even if we did have a clearly defined threshold the safety issue cannot end snowmobiling on the LRT
because it is too easy to resolve.
In the first place, pedestrian traffic could just as easily be banned from the trail as snowmobile traffic, and
so far we have no evidence that the effect of one ban would be broader in its total recreational impact than
the other. It's important to remember that without the grooming provided by the snowmobiling clubs, very
little winter activity on the trail, on the part of pedestrians, would be possible. When we consider the cost
of the patrolling, we need to also consider the cost to the city of grooming the trail.
Second, the constnlction of a small, unobtrusive pedestrian side trail along the LRT, especially with the
financial input of the snowmobile industry, snowmobile clubs, and perhaps even the county and the DNR,
might incur a fraction of the cost associated with any section of our city-wide trail plan. It would be
inconsistent of city government to preserve recreation along our roadways, with expensive side trails, while
refusing to do so along the LRT at what might be a much lower cost. If safety is the ONLY issue, there is
little question that it can be very pmctically resolved.
3. If mixed use of the LRT is a real nuisance to residents living along the LRT then both the Snowmobile
Task Force and the Council will want to revisit the earlier conclusion that this is not the case. Both
bodies would start focusing on civil engineering solutions to that problem, instead of focusing
exclusively on the issue of whether or not there should be a total ban.
We may have lost a lot of time we should have. spent devising quality of life solutions for both
snowmobilers and non-snowmobiling residents, by focusing only on the issue of a total ban based on purely
subjective estimates of safety.
All responsible snowmobilers are struggling with the quality oflife issue. Part of it is that taking a
snowmobile to Lake Minnetonka on the LRT is another positive difference, from their point of view,
.t
between Shorewood and more urbanized communities - a special difference they want to preserve without
annoying people who reside along the LRT.
If reason prevails, we may be able to ask ourselves what the measure of annoyance should be and derive
ways of dealing with the annoyance. Perhaps a 10 mther than a 20-mile per hour speed limit, or grooming
the trail with snow walls that will send the noise upward, or speed restriction devices, would help make life
better for people living along the LRT. I believe there will be tremendous support among the vast majority
of the snowmobilers for devices that are truly helpful and safe. There might be pmctical results for the first
time in years.
If noise or trespassing is a real issue, or perhaps even the issue, then we have not been making the progress
we should have been making on that front We have been held up by an overwhelmingly subjective debate
about safety and a total ban - a ban that might not serve our quality oflife goals in the long roo because the
political context of snowmobiling on the LRT is not simply local. We need to be pmctical and wise in our
choice of strategies.
.
.
.
.
,..g(--J
~~~
\:-J QS 'V 07 \J>- ?_'17 ':.J-
f'JOSCCO?b'J: ?\'ll3
-;r >710 ~6l J 761'1 cH; I
~ """""* ~ (;C;;O '2
~)\) ~) oJ.,i>'7
.f'(3 ~/(J I UV''-: . ~
~1n~~
J. rw"AJ " :c:" iY
\X\- .
.
.
-,. ".-.'
r'OJ! 9~ 3/~' (l,
. S1' .:;;a7h'tJ Cl?-?; i:"
"
.
.
1'(j ......r ~ 111.v,-,; QqI..t5 C5'
/ f55'V r- (i??Nl.' (l;;~ .8hSJ
f~9117 0' It; ~ ~ iT) ry P ~ J.92 ..., it
SS3.IPPV
3tl1U~
g661 '/-t u~nu~r
1JVll.1 ].11'1 IDIJ. N.O {)N.!'ll9:0WMON.S
wallO! ~aao
OPEN FORUM
SNOWMOBILING ON THE LRT TRAIL
January 27, 1998
Name
Address
eLJc)(.)(!
.
.
LIV J
ecJ.
'/1-n/-/tJk ~
l ,
d.'1Sq 0 Srr\, K ~.
53tJ~~ y-.
.
.
/..tw,Yia 'clJ
SS-35/
-rJ-I-t;;A1/f:f Il-~ ~ Z J 760 L/JUJ'IDIlIK4-
L
OPEN FORUM
SNOWMOBILING ON THE LRT TRAIL
January 27, 1998
Address
..c
.
.
.
~I -
S-~oo we-o (jVJtAlO &1..
G'bOO Srn er...; tV lJ .
~, 0$ \JQC'~;V6 Clv-cle
s-7icJ tJgj:J?;ct'C/ ~
y
OPEN FORUM
SNOWMOBILING ON THE LRT TRAIL
January 27, 1998
Name
Address
"<:"$ \.C) AtA-(~ ~,
2- 4 q '50 ,Pt M L, -Ge t&A-O
~o r sm I nhvl-tlJ-V 1Z1:J
5~ro5 Wft!2f)/Nb:, L-JJ I
5 Lj (p () c;Je-fJ Ub.A!tJO (} t:1 1<..
".
.
2J/
12-')
.
.
559 lu2-(.I~ RJ
7rt,~S./ ~rn'J
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
1/27/98
NAME fetal hJ/IJevfsfYL
,
ADDRESS :260 5~ Sin/It ~lN/^- !-a~ e
PHONE. 470- ?( (Pb
General Comments:
~os+ ~a~~+-1-~ {;~ dJ-t 1f eM- ~/Sfft0
· ~~~ fr/%% ~~ ~/o J'~JttbiJr
.{~~ft:rL~~
.~~~~~~
~.~
· ~j::: ;JJt~tt/~~~
~~ ~ /M~\L; ~.
(1
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
~ 1127/98 tJ /?t1
NAMe ~'i I u/J-"isO/7 f-.. 'rCvt--t! 0/&"tso;
ADD~F.SSjJ",os-s- (Q07l-rIrbWO Lt'J
PHONE lj70--g'1 bb
General Comments:
.
..
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
/"1 COMMENT SHEET
;; i . 1/27/98
NAME 'WI) hPbAA).f
ADDRESS ~<5 8~~#hu/'0
PHONE (j74-~&77
General Comments:
-ad:x ~ jilU Jy-lf ~{i^-. fJvj; ~ ~
· t f
(' ~+ l()A,"-'Q .f.o rllL0U,,- ~ rLw:1K '
.
~A~~ ~~. 0 ~~"J ~~;WJr,.
&f ·
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
""' 1/27/98
NAME (/A#! (J17A1-nJ/Y1/.l~~
i/ $')":I^! . - -Tn' ~ f" .. /
ADDRE~ S'/.5-5'" .QLdJ;Art'1.A -7 PrVL-
PHONE "17'1- ~ 5-. ,)Y
General Comments:
NJ~ t'~41A',,"1
y
.
.
~
f
.~
=
.
.
..2
(Jt17XJr/
:Sluammo3 l~.Iaua~
.
.
~
= -t:'h~C? I1l/l. a. d
(' , ~;J aWvl<
86/L'Ul
.Lams wawwo::>
U1U.L .L1I~ a'll no ~nn!qoUlA\OUS
muJ.IDlW wmlO.i NaclO aOOA\mIORS
4.
, 1r
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
1/27/98
:::: ~1 ,~Ab )
ESS V &h/~d~-
PHONE 1f1J1f-P3/3
General Comments:
-f:.~ ~4i,,~/-/b~ OX~/Jvfi-:~Jj-J~P0.
1 ~ . _ ) !:-;:;;;!(j::;~~ .
~f:r:~~;;~~)~~'
. . '.J~ ?-&id4i/ ~~4J ~LJ~'
qnp4* 6~~ .P'~ ~ P ~ ,/ft/~~?
-:m ·
,v;14~ n - -d$f _~;dfit !t?P ~/~-4' .
jy ,:I.k)cdfd~,~1.d5 ~4 LhJ ~Jg~/~
. ?"~
~<<W W/fJ1 ~.,~';
-I
i
..
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COlVIMENT SHEET
1/27/98
NAME In/kt'~ rI l/Jr/ /-/&r(y'A/)
A D D RE SS J'~ 'IS' ;:i J". /'././11 f!EI.
PHONE
lj)-J!-- / t f}-
General C;:;omments:
!/llLdd~ ~.ALl~,' lJfft'.LJ" 141'/ Lf T: ~ II,U, t[;,r;- l~
". . I. I ...... . . . . ..
Jf}/J(I}(f1()JoT/;?/ tJn <fjti.f -.frail. !?J4A./4fA2-'S' AJ~;:(e-:. ,c.5m~//,
- .. , . /
~
-
~aJ.~kt ' !/
=
Jt{ Jonlj fJvrf dUG !/
..
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
1/27/98
NAME Glnb~\~
ADDRESS 1....ruO A~t.Ll r~:J
PHONE .t-{j 6 ~ 67.-7-2_
General Comments:
_:[ (\\,~ CM ~. l-~ \Yo,~1
t: ~\y\ (; W"'t~ v{"" + \"l\ t- .t \v\ W
U\J \ ~ \. \ V <f~ ~(( (rv0 I' A + ; tJt1l\<:~~
~h '" t> V\ tivv\ u.... .. U
\
~ II\{. p"\ u. \M.1Nvt ~~l>-< -I- ~ '('(~--p ",,-{ ~ b r r ''-trf-
tf1 -df:,( ~nA- Y1 ~ t- i7tC( c; ~ ~ r :UA < ,
t) :::3:::
F i V\L'\ ~rv h\ (J-( 9:1'~1h-D I) ..
[:'+'5~J( "" ~~~ cM~\r_ \ i f':l ~~~ ~ lei L~ .
_f~^~n:1A \,~ Lt (~V V'f/\ o~ r VVlI -\- .
. ~ \ r
~ w ~ bC'~
'- ~, Uk t- tfVv\ Q ~ .
~tf d.\ \-' Crv-t GJ" . I
0.. ~ rv,: +- ..
~$. -TMfu~'\i~-
. &Y\f~L ~ n~l ~ oA.t\/'1f1,. IvALLA-j
\'MQVOVJIJ. 0" ,L u>d\ Wd1j:'- W\~. tltvJ~
. tY h n 'vJ CVV\ t tJ..- V\!f'\I\ f,Md-rd) I t,.,r -Q t' V- t\ , t
6.\ { IA~,~" -
-- \
" _ i'v\><Y~6\}r- ::r ,^,^W lx.f-'V\ WL~ vr u+
\' ':l (J /A I'YI J \"1- 6.. \'lA flvYl fA -t- \<-q 01:.\ ~ (5 ~
.- ~~~. V\ c\ \..AJ-. LYCi0vl \r',Atn.-dd,g L "'(.1 \-1'1JflA.,J VlA__t l;j' (Q/1/
:lo
(,~
.
.
;!
.
.
.
.
"
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
NAr.JE J};1'JCl 1h'r;}7198
ADDRESSrYYS-9c) S/Y)~~L /l!
PHONE L(7r-0s~
General Comments:
!j-
Cr;y>J,/JlOrn!5c ~
!:
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
1/27/98
NAME 11?~a1~, 11J~/;..a.,r-
ADI!RESS '1tJ Cj!~rb~~a ~J !JAM
PHONE ;(h{;)...) f!i:# 'I?'f-;;J. 530 --5#3'5/
General Comments:
7l/'1' -V~ ~ J- ~~
~ ~J<r~ cJ-hd-tu-~~,
19~ ~~ct a/n ~tU~ ~ Y
~}~. . ~ ~ ~ ~--!t(!V-T-
tI . .' . . .
.
.
~ ~~~J2- ~.
R~J7/W~~ ~.<-~
U~~~,
C~ .
.
.i
f
!
j
!
'fI'>"
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM J\'IEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
NAME b",,;l ~:R
ADDRESS 5701 ~ocj~vck C,'rrJe
PHONE L/7L(- ~ )51 ,
General Comments:
~(crA~k fL- Tr~,(\ - ol9V:1
A) <'A ~ ){J~V\+ L + .:r
g'l\ t1<... t-,...... It, t wI] oS l"" /J
1c, to \""--1 c.-I-t' nA /+ ,
c. b S' c.. ,{t..
c C\~ 4 ~ o1.,_wt.~ 1" r ~
-r.. b<- odt bl~
~ "y- 1
l: 0>'\ 's ,
i~~~~
.411 0-1 ~
1-l<.. ('(1 ~ J
I t r. ( (
r ~c.. c.. ,if!~'" ,~.s ~....s I +-5 /),-.$ +
L\ I . I I I
k &\ f-c...r.s " '" ...... t'\ 0 kM J . \..c.. d 9 "\
+nr t~rs. ;^.t. ~~J.J.<-YJl'7 I\..
:+- <-+5 /,,,,$ ~-J '~+-5 of-fr___d,rc..
~-Jet/.c", ,-calk \A/Cl\."+- f~ c/"'$~
,r:.( p,~~tb/c _ I: +-~ 4 ~ S 'vrJ ,
,..J
~~((
...,... ...-/H
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
COMMENT SHEET
1/27/98
NAML5/;t'7/ v-- f~lIj/ (J'/hi'ri:,orJ
ADDRESS.;'t;DLS"""S (')mFtA!ou.//1 L/7
PHONE 11D.--rIGc-.,
~. eneral Comments:
'urO/DOe/tv
/.. / /
!. r
D I(?~
~
ee~
"'-~
.
.
.
.~
t
.
.
.
.
1 01-30-1998 12:14 6129324125
Bl/24/1998 16:57 6124724349
FPSQ-TWIN CITIES
FARt€S
P.01/01
PAGE B1
_: LRT........ 'nII1
tIIII: 81-01.1120:32:22 EST
PIDm: MIll"
'nt; city.......................
oe:'__lSoI...
I ... ..... . 8horwlJ1l1d ........".,... ... UI8 to .. the nil........ lbalflllWlllObll. CIIM Into ... f
donat....... an tIw trII. ........ CDI caunby ..... narl:lr...... dIIIIv U.__IIIIIIIN. I CGnIkiIr W. . great
_. not" be .. IV '*' IM""--' thIIln C1f..,...
.. the COlt 01........ tnIII..-.... _.,., _111_ jIIItIIIlrI
I:lId the tINt... ..... twh......... ria ....1IdIItInCe -..... ~ (111........ -> far... .. ....... et
~ thI'lDM11lJ~""
. ... " . ~ .. thIt ..."... ... fldIfnIdng .. UIUIIY..... ..lall1ClWlMlll.. spad, mild", far...,
........ ..........
,*-'* fill ttwt .. matadZId WNefllIIIoUId III ...... tam tile..
"-*YGU far 1M""'" fII........" ,UMnIt '"' .......
..... V....
,.............. -.............. .... ,
.
.
.
.
.
January 27, 1998
To the Mayor and Members of the Council:
Our opposition to the use of the LRT does not mean we want a ban of snowmobiles in
Shorewood. Nor are we taking shots at the Shorewood snowmobile owners. Instead our
opposition stems from the significant compromise of our quality of life and safety that occurs
every winter as long as the activity continues on the LRT.
The compromising of quality of life goes beyond the noise and fumes, which in themselves are
considerable. It extends to the emotional anguish we have felt since 1982 over the frustration of
dealing with City Hall. Unfortunately, you have inherited this aggravation. Our feelings are no
different than those of the Watten Pond neighbors who reacted to the loss of woods and wetlands,
to the Smithtown Road residents feeling of revulsion when crews came to install city water, or the
Seamans Drive and Shorewood Oaks neighbors who felt their quality of life would be
compromised by Senior Housing. Those factors, coupled with a City Hall that has been dedicated
to perpetuating snowmobiling in Shorewood, no matter what, have cost us our quality of life.
To add to this it seems the "experts" continue to be people who are not experts at all because they
don't live here! We have had a planning commissioner from Christmas Lake collect and arbitrarily
analyze all sorts of data. (Being sure to focus on the real problem: complaining neighbors.) We
have had the city administrator park at a street crossing for an hour and declare no problems.
What next? A secretary from city hall doing trail walks? When will we be empowered?
Every winter our back and front yards are invaded by people from allover the country, as the
citations indicate, who have absolutely no vested interest in this community or its values
whatsoever. Their only interest is to get from Point A to Point Band they-don't care when they
do it or how fast. They may never pass this way again. Shorewood snowmobilers should be
outraged at their counterparts who have made it so difficult for them.
This local trail is marketed nationally by the DNR and the use of it will only increase. Why were
we so adamant about keeping non-Shorewood senior citizens out of our housing project, but our
doors are wide open to this recreation?
There are many questions that continue to plague those of us who live along the LRT, the least of
which is why Shorewood is held hostage by this past time, and the most urgent of which is, "when
will we be believed and allowed to be part of this process?
~ i ere1y, f.) I
K~ ~ca WM--t
& Pat Arnst ~
t'7-/'IO ~ &
1I1:2i':!'l.'1 11:15
'5"612 3.'32 :.J.'39u
MARKET STRT P.-\RT
ll!J1I1I':
..
Clay Atkinson
5735 Brentridge Dr.
S horewood. MN
To the Board! Attendees:
r unfortunately could not attend this meeting. therefore I am providing
this WTitten statement.
.
.
While I am concerned about snowmobiles and their impact on the
quality of life. I have a greater concern about the processes of
Shorewood City government.
Why is this meeting taking place? What does the mayor. and those
board members on hiS team. have in mind? Is there any chance that
the mayor and those aligned with him will really change the1r minds
as a result of anything said at this meeting?
Based on what I have seen to-date. the people In this room should be
more concerned with how this mayor and his board member
supporters conduct the process of city government.
.
.
Although I have only anecdotal evidence for many of my concerns
about abuses of the process. I am spec1f1cally concerned that one of
the most competent and fair people I have ever known was removed
from the park commission- -my wife. Ann Packard. Apparently the
mayor indicated that she was removed because we called and
complained about a snowmobile rules violation. In contrast, I'm
confident that most of the snowmobile commun1ty would have
accepted and understood the complaint because they are trying to
self- regulate.
So. do we have a situation where the mayor believes Ann Packard had a
bias against snowmobiles. therefore she is out? If the mayor has a bias
toward snowmoblles. should he then also be removed?
I hope this community can look beyond our personal beliefs and
desires rdated to snowmobIles. trails and water systems. etc. and
keep an eye on proceedings of this board. I also hope that board
members are able to make independent decisions based on respect for
duc process.
Thank you.
?;:~~;$~~::;r:::
y ~~ J;-'<tf' Cf~n ^>J~
. 4? "71.iJ ~'Y'WJ~
""'" (( :9 -a ~~ . 7~;,jJ 'ffTJ
~y ~~' W'J'u> '/IdUlOh'O"- ~-'
~rl~';rw~'P %o--ri ~;r
"OU
-I
.
.
. OJ --
'~~~f~~~~~~
~ ~p, >o/>'r~' -rr f.p r- T ~w
~~ ~~r~ ~ ~..-rrQ)
~"~~ 5(f:77"
~ frO ~ 1(.0 ~ -+ --~ is" "o~'
~~r~~ry~~n
.
.
^8i
I
,
[[;-:5/-1
! -,
=.
=--
=
~
=
~
-.
--
=
=
~
c ~ ~?'('-'~ rvr" er Jrn =
'=
.. ,
L
.
.
.
.
City Council: Jan 27, 1998
How I have waited for this meeting to come, there was nothing
that was going to keep me away. Finally a chance to voice my
opinion, to vent my anger, to speak my peace. As a resident of
Shorewood for 18 years, I have that right. Sadly, my Mother In
Law died on Sunday, and I am preparing for a funeral on Wed. I
hope that you have time to read my letter.
We have lived on Smithtown Road long enough to have watched the
last train go by. We purchased our home knowing the tracks would
soon be leaving . We were looking for a peaceful place to raise
our child~en. We are on a lot of almost 3 acres, with our home
being close to the middle of the lot. We do have a ~ot of space
between our home and the trail, I cannot imagine what the noise
would be like on a smaller lot.
What we have endured and continue to endure is the drone of
snowmobiles. The constant tracking into ouryyard, front and
rear, the continuous dis-regard for the time limits on the track
and for peoples property. ~ll you have to do is walk along the
track about one week after a fresh snowfall and see what has
happened. After the trail is beaten down and is bumpy, they find
new snow. I call it the snowmobilers mentality, "Where there's
snow, I can Go". Don't neglect to check out the front properties
along Smithtown Road. We actually think our new trees are big
enough to survive the winter this year, actually, it's not the
winter they are surviving, but the snowmobilers. I've tried all
I can to keep this from happening, signs, twine, flags, forget it.
closing the trail is not going to do it for all of us, you have
to ban snowmobiles from Shorewood. Why does Shorewood have to be
one of a few that still allows this recreational use for so many,
yet does nothing to insure residents along the trail some peace
and quiet. Why is their recreation more important than a handful
of residents along the trail. Why do I have to have my s~e~p
interupted on a Sunday night at 10:45?Why do I have to listen
to them on a Saturday morning sit at the stop signs and rev
their engines. When these time limits are set, did it ever occur
to anyone that some people work at night and have to sleep during
the day?
We had great neighbors that had snowmobiles, we never voiced
our opinion very strongly because we felt they deserved to
have some recreation. They never went into our yard because
they knew and respected our property. They also put up with a
few of our recreations. It was a neighbor thing. It is not our
neighbors who are abusing the trail and my yard. I feel that I
have a right to keep these people out of my yard, and you have
an obligation to assure me of some sort of peace an quiet. You
need to be realistic, there are more snowmobilers out there than
people who live on the trail. What good does an open forum do?
A few years ago I was so frustrated by the snowmobilers that I
called the city. I was given Mr. Puzaks name as being the President
of the snowmobile club, that I should give him a call. I left him
several messages over a three day period, of course I got no
response. I call the city back, they were very helpful in directing
me to the top of the ladder. When I described where I lived and
they located it on the map as we spoke, he said" What the heck
are they doing in Your Yard". What could I say, he was very
helpful and gave me the name and phone number of someone at the
DNR. She was wonderful. I got a call from Mr Puzak within a few
hours. He asked for my patience and a fe~Jdays to help me out.
Sure enough, within a week we had some hay bo~in our yard. It
helped, but not enough. He had also asked me what the snowmobilers
were doing in our yard. What can I say. These are not all young
people causing the problems, I have seen many adults with small
children on their sleds going off the trail. Why not teach them
at a young age that these signs do not apply for everyone to
f~llow the rules. I love the sign by our house on Smithtown
Road directing them to the trail.
I do want to point out in all honesty that some have tried. I love
it every time I see the lights go on in the squad car that is
quite often behind our house. I love it that I don't hear that
constant drone of the trail groomer in the middle of the night,
especially since it's headlight no longer circles our bedroom
when it turned aroung. I love it whenever I see the officer
standing on the trail with a radar gun, but is this really where we
want him spending his time?
~
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
How can you have a trail with people walking, skiing and driving
snowmobiles. Please don't wait until someone gets hurt. I saw
two skiers out on a Saturday morning at 6:30 AM. Are they just
early morning people, or people being realistic. You need to take
these motorized sleds out of Shorewood. Closing the trail will not
solve the problem at our house. You should not be considering
the opinions or suggestions of anyone outside of Shorewood.
Ss a resident and taxpa~er in Shorewood I think that my wishes
should be considered over an outsider, They should not have the
right to attend an open forum, and be allowed to give their
opinions, they must have their own city. I think you should
be considering every possible thing that you can do as an elected
official to let me have the privacy that I deserve.
I am signing my name to this letter, but I do hope that you do
not give my name out. I think some people will know who I am,
but I don't think I could stand any abuse to myself or my
property at this time. Please let me know if there is going to
be a meeting that will consider Shorewood Residents only, not
outsiders.
Pat Olsen
~::ro~
.
P.S. Love the few hay bales that were put on our property after
the letter on the forum came out. Too bad you didn.t bother
with our front yard. Too little, too late.
January 27, 1998
Tom Dahlberg
Mayor, City of Shorewood
5775 Country Club Road
Shorewood,~. 55331
Dear Mr. Dahlberg,
.
.
Our family recently moved from Minneapolis (Lake Harriet area) to a new
development in Shorewood. Although we will miss living in south
Minneapolis, especially the charm of Lake Harriet, Shorewood has plenty to
offer. The LRT Trail was a factor in our decision when we purchased our
home. My Wife and I are both very active and have two small children and
a big dog that loves his exercise - so the LRT Trail has been a great
resource!
.
.
However, the reason for this letter is to express my concern regarding
snowmobile use on the LRT Trail. A couple of weeks ago I was walking my
dog on the LRT Trail just after 5:00 p.m. We were going west on the Trail
between Wedgewood Drive and Hwy 19 when two snowmobiles
approached me from behind at a hil!h rate ofsueed. Unfortunately, I didn't
hear the snowmobiles because I was listening to music with my headphones
and I was at a point on the Trail where it bends around the comer. Luckily
my dog stopped and alerted me that something was behind us. We were
able to dive out of the way and off the Trail just in time to avoid the
snowmobiles which never stopped or slowed down to see if we were all
right. Had my children been with me, I'm not sure we would have been
able to get out of the way.
First of all, banning snowmobile use in the City of Shorewood is not a
realistic approach, but allowing snowmobiles to have access to the LRT
Trail puts innocent individuals at risk. I understand that the speed limit is
20mph / 10mph when pedestrians are present -- THIS IS A JOKE
especially once it gets later at night. I have also noticed that snowmobilers
do not follow the curfew that is in place. The result is that I have concern
over the safety of my family and no longer can enjoy the benefits that the
LRT Trail offers because of snowmobiles. As a taxpaying citizen of your
community, it is a violation and extremely disappointing.
Mr. Dahlberg, every year in the State of Minnesota we hear about people
losing their lives on snowmobiles, that is a risk an individual takes anytime
they ride a snowmobile, we can't control that nor should we. However, you
and the council members have the responsibility to make changes to laws
when necessary for the overall safety and welfare of its people. I urge you
to take action and ban snowmobile use on the LRT Trail. Hopefuny, an
innocent person does not have to die before this is taken seriously.
Sincerely,
Joe McGinnis
5790 Smith town Way
Shorewood
(H) 474 - 6375
(W) 921 - 1387
c:
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
James Hurm
t
~
.
.
.
.
Xl....; .' ~.. /'
....' o-
j ,r. ..- j. . -
\-. c.,; ~......
..
.
.
.
. --.
.;;~v;:;:pu~~~~~~m~~~~1A:;~S r%~
~~~ ~~~'W~d$ #~ l-=tmil/)~ ...~ lAT
--~'frW'(fr~-~1f- -~rpm:u~ .~(ff11f ~-~.~ .... -
'77f1T1YJ!- ar ~-~<WWfJ},%.-~-(jr ..~. - pr~'1J..~ - ....
- r\JS~~~7#?7fIlm1: ~~--iJm'~.'1!7lff<YWV.. -. .....
.-<r- .HI~ryp-~fiWrV1J-F 51 ~~71jJ..- 'qpq~-~.T-~- ~
pr17JO~ v:~. -1I1-:(I~~1rp~. T~. .. -. ~~ ~=-~~...
.. t ~~4'JF-Mw).;~1VPJ'1{n,r~-
._~mJ _... . .. O'l} ~?i1+~rIAr~----
dnp -~. ~~~Jrwo?t:!trJ':fr-~~~ l~---
~f:/l ...._-lJ1/IWt~-pwP<;;~r1.~--.
-w~trrr. (rVjJTrt#Jd.-. ~~fi1lU-rwi)'-!. ~.pr----.
~fP.--F-.;.p-~ :I~M'-_. .TVfI:. -rr:m-~ ~~---~ .
-7;g~1.gfrrrzrrn; ~~--~--~-- - .
(j ~. ~-:..
7-1"':7).. P S i~~-~-;jiff-~ 7Tjcn-ar;----.
.~~zp~l(J ~)fi1 ~m-~ ~ry-~pr1 ?!"'lj----..
. ~~-<YpJ-.~-ryt-mm-~-?1IY\f .oM-.-....-
~;tp'~_1j;!M-~m~n:.~~.,m;.~T~-- ...
=~+-g;:;/t7V':;{-/S~:;.:::;~~71f~-~.._~-~. .
_.m.y"~~-5-~-7Vj).--~.i~~~~.~~~-~~. ..
-. ..- 90- -fkm ~ ry.:-r:r~ vrnnu >uw, ~7au.~-Jlff ~fY\JF~.~. .
= ~~'~~
..)rYrU1\f(i1~-~~-lAff ... (;~QW~~~ Of ~.
.. -"i?~V'9(\'\-tr:.'1.)fJ.~-~r ~ ~. WJ74"'3
-1,(.Q~~.-pwv-~~1(\!f. .~_.. c,p~,!1'l[l~ J.~ 1(V\
.. ...... ..' _..~~~\)J yuum'J~ ~ 9J,
. ...
-.
--
~'~~Jrr-61
r/~"VVY(/V (J. .~
. .I-~~
-e---------
~l'W0'{-()'Y}P) 1~-~I-~~r:rlliM~ chq--~-or_"P
.-"W1J-__~fY1-n-tr1f --... ~1:11fJ-~-i7.1---~r--.~-~IffF7'17~~~
-vn;;..Q-:PrnTiIJl-~~ ~~ Vjl J-7f1!1J~[YJ~-~F-Pr&;
~---~.i'v.. ~..~/t!/~~-~JfW1T~?5>Qf1----'~
0'1f-'fr.- ~ MwJ~p;pp: fwCcml ~
--. ?!W ~ .~.....""xtq-p-~ff,-~ryf7--V-P~
or
.
.~
lfv~')tL ~ . ~-LcD.J ~\AP C1J;'J9lu.~~ ')-~
~<, jund ffU1UJ1Ja'] fJt{tJlf O@ fJ!i/08d fJCf,l UJOJd
j :K>W3.Ln !)NI.L3VdWI ~ '" ~.Q _. ..
1 ~ -U-0J ~ ~ ~ (){l-"Y <;.{ u--c 'f~
~ -;. ~ ~'-.C'i .~ ~
~ -W-'>>"" ~ .~.:o'u9~4
fYrv~~.~ ~I"' )~.~ 'lrv.~ on-9 (r0').
.~'~ ~~ ~~.~ ~ -ff 'OO~~
~~ ~C'cr; 'O~~\A.O~
-~~~ 9-0 ~1o ~~ ~~~
~~~~~-+~-~~~
17(}1/ "~ ~ -\-. ~ ~ 9:0 ~~
~~ ~~" ~~;-'V ~tYNJYy ~ ~'Y)-
ct~-y rd ~ ?G') ~~~ ~'V ~ ~ ~
\{V~ ~~rwv ~~;-rv ~ +
~.-q:0\f2:- ~&7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
-o<Yr ~ 9lf~~--> ~ .~ ~ ~(fj
~~~ ~?V<rOh/ L~ ~d ~~ ~ ~
~. ~~-ro V~~~ ~/~ ~
~~I}'O-0 i r~ ~~ ~
- ....~ 'tl-';'"YY ~ -:5ii7 ~ ortf07lt ff (I~
'~ -L 'd 7 0\.f'X- \A..O ~~ qH..Q1J../JY1Sh/'v".,r
U ,----+-- ) . 0
~ ~ ~~ ell: <:(~A
. ._-~-~~ ~TISJ? ~ ot
l 8 ' ,
i~ . ~19~Amwd
',.li 8. 65t f..'. \'vr ~.I..... ~I'~
. I' II" ldnJ WI
U~, .. ,nn, f\'.-=jiii I: ~
--' =,! '-_! ,d).=:J i L.
- - ---_._--
..
.
.
.
..
..
,
c,
.
.
.
.
Message Received on the Shoreline on January 27, 1998:
Hi, this is Joyce Holcomb calling at 25675 Smithtown Road, and my husband Dick and I
live on the trail, on the Smithtown roadway right at Eureka, right where Eureka goes north
actually, so we are backing to the light rail transit trail. I forgot to send anything in to you
about this open forum meeting tonight and I intended to do it, but I will tell you on the
voice mail, on the Shoreline comment line. Contrary to what you are hearing from other
people, we do not see any problem at all with the snowmobiles. They have found religion
shall we say this past year or two because there has been scrutiny of their behavior, so
there hasn't been any problem. They are not going up on our grass, they are not speeding
past us when we are walking with the dogs, they are not doing a lot of things. I want to
still be able to walk with the dogs, and the dogs are on a leash on the trail, so there
shouldn't be any problem with that. To me right now they are not a problem at all, they
seem to stop at the right time in the evening, they are going the right speed limit, they slow
down when they see people, they are not up on my grass, and so the whole thing. I don't
see a problem, so count me in on this side, and my husband also, on the side of the people
who are not finding it a problem at all. I think they do need a place to go, what do we want
them doing? Trying to sneak into parks at night and going across the fields? You have
been very effective in keeping them out of Freeman Park. I can see that no one has been in
there and that is wonderful. I think they are just fine on the trail, and again Joyce Holcomb
and Dick Holcomb, 25675 Smithtown Road. And that is in Shorewood, 474-4768. Bye
bye.
( ~A ~ ~ (:) --voO'""cr~ ,.
. ,,~
.
.
.
.
Wednesday, January 28, 1998
l~' ~~~n~lI~~\
, JAN ~ 8 1991 ~;,
~- \
, 8y.
Shorewood City Council
RE: LRT Meeting 1/27/98
GentlemenlLadies of the Shorewood City Council,
I attended last nights LRT meeting regarding dual use of the LRT I listened to the issues and
was impressed at points made by both snowmobilers and non- snowmobilers. Unfortunately, I
did not hear a WIN WIN Solution.
There have been a number of council meetings regarding the shared used of the LRT but no real
action by the council. In the mean time, the snowmobile LRT usage numbers continue to grow
along with Shorewoods Population Density. If nothing changes, it is only a matter of time until the
first serious accident.
The issue is safety. Can man and machine share a 8 to 10 foot wide path? Ask a snowmobile
owner and he will say YES, ask a walker/Cross County Ski type and he will say NO. I do not think
that attitude will ever change regardless of how many meetings are held.
Both Sides have to give a little. We are all Shorewood Residents using the LRT for recreational
use.
My Recommendations.
Chanae the Snowmobile Curfew
8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Sun. through Thur
8 a.m. to 9 p.m.. Sat & Sun
Restrict LRT Snowmobile usage to Shorewood Residents.
If Non-Resident Snowmobilers want to use the trail, they must purchase a
seasons permit from City Hall ($75?), provide proof of insurance, and be given
the "Shorewood Trail Rules". Limit the number of permits available.
The overall result would be fewer non-resident snowmobiles, fewer resident complaints, and
reduced probability of serious accidents.
It is time for the Shorewood City Council to take ownership of this LRT issue. The safety issues
for Shorewood Residents demand immediate attention. The facts are in, now it is time to take
the necessary steps to make the LRT safe for All.
Sincerely,
~,
Gary Anderson
26940 W62nd St
Shorewood
.\ ,~
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD OPEN FORUM MEETING
Snowmobiling on the LRT Trail
Comment Sheet
~~~t;. .~~W~~l
inl Fr-- !
U U t. b '2 1998 I
By I
Dave Fredrickson
26370 Peach Circle
470-4587
Having attended the meeting on Tuesday night, I felt it is very necessary to express my thoughts
on the issue of snowmobiling on the L TR. The city council has its work cut out for them on this
issue, because the squeaky wheel gets the oil and in this case the anti-snowmobiling group is
starting to rust! It always amazes me to see and feel emotion of a few and how they can soon
dictate policy for us all. In order for the council to fairly legislate policy on this issue, they must
first and foremost govern with real facts. Actual police reports, number of actual arrest on the
trail, purpose of the arrest, where and when the violations occurred, city resident or non city
resident, type of violation, history on the trail, expense by the city for maintenance of the trail,
number of users on the trail by category (walker, cross country skier or snowmobile), and any
financial aid given to the trail by the DNR because of license requirement or any other useful
information in making a sound decision. Then and only then can you sit down and make a
rational decision, on the use of the trail by anyone.
For over 7 years my wife and I have lived on Peach Circle, currently with two kids under 3 years
old and we both work, so we too like our peace and quite at the end of busy day. In the winter
time I like most Minnesota people I know, have their windows closed, and don't hear much of
any thing going on outside. The noise concerns may be legitimate but totally of opinion. Any
snowmobile traveling at 20 MPH should not cause the windows to rattle. The law has already
restricted the time of use, so late evening noise is already against the law. Enforce the curfew.
The enforcement of snowmobile laws are really the only way to get the word out to the
surrounding communities that come to use Shorewood's 2.5 miles of trail. Inform them of the
violations by arrest and posting of signage. Our discussion at the forum indicated that Shorewood
residents know the sensitivity of the use of our trail, but I can guarantee that 90% of the outside
traffic have no idea of the laws and restrictions in Shorewood. Post the restrictions and fine
schedule. Post stop signs twice to reinforce everyone reads the laws on this 2 mile stretch before
entering the trail.
The last and most important concern on the trail is safety. No one wants to see or hear of anyone
getting injured or killed. Sometimes enforcement of laws alone will not prevent an accident. The
suggestion at the meeting of restricting use by walkers and skiers makes a great deal of sense.
The trail is only open 4 II;lonths out of the year to snowmobiling. Restrict pedestrian use to the
other 8 months out of the year or post "Walk at Own Risk" signs for those that must walk down
snowmobile tracks in the middle of winter. Another suggestion was to widen the trail or establish
a walking trail down in the ditch or sides of the trail away from the elevated portion. After all if
you want to walk, you are probably looking for exercise or a peaceful encounter with nature,
what a better place than down in the woods and not above them as the elevated trail currently
provides.
The conclusion of the matter is that only a few people have a noise problem and a few have safety
concerns. The majority want to have an outlet out of the city to have a little family fun. Lets face
it, Minnesota is trying to legislate and micro manage their way into everything we see and do in
life.
.
.
.
..,....
.....
NOIIWEST BANKS
.....
.."'..
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Wayzata Office
900 East Wayzata Boulevard
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
612/473-8855
>~~--~-"'-..,......._,-_.".,~...",. ~,
-'I 1-r-==:
~ ,~ -' ! ~-=:
:'iJ }j (~.:'
d-;
I fl ~ _, :.t
i i Ii ,-,,-\ ;', ,')
~ ;...'
January 20, 1998
By
Mayor Thomas Dahlberg
City of Shore wood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Subject: Norwest Ha1fMarathon
Dear Mayor Dahlberg:
The 18th annual Norwest Half Marathon (formerly Lake Minnetonka Half Marathon)
between Wayzata and Excelsior is scheduled for Sunday, May 3, 1998. We will begin
the race at 8 A.M. The route will be the same as in past years.
Once again, we will be contributing race proceeds to lake area community endeavors.
Please send me any permit applications your ordinances may requires. I will complete
and return them immediately upon receipt.
Should you have any questions, please call me at 476-3882.
Sincerely,
iJJ;J~
Paul W. Maahs
Vice President
PWM/ld
#'-/B
..
JAN-28-1998 16:29
SOUTH LAKE M I NNETONKA PD
612 474 4477 P.01
SOUTH LAKE MINNETO PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
810 lsiorBoWevard
Excelsio Minnesota 55331
RICHARD A. YOUNG
Chief or Police
To:
Teri Naab
Chief Rick Youn~
January 28, 1998
From:
Date:
Subject:
Norwest Half Marathon
(612) 474-3261
RANDlIM
VlAFAXONLY
This is an annual event. It has never b any problem. I would recommend approval of any
required permit.
"'__.:.. r.._...4' ..I,.. II:..__....._L.. ,........... -.:... .Ift......,....:... ,.._...._...~'" .t>L___n__J _JT_f... D.__
TOTAL P.01
.
.
DRAfT
10
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1998
MINUTES
1. CONVENE PARK COMMISSION MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
Vice Chair Dallman called the meeting to order at 7 :31 p.m.
A.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Puzak (arrived at 7:40 p.m.); Commissioners Colopoulos, Bensman,
Dallman, Arnst, Themig and Cochran; Administrator Jim Hurm; Park Planner Mark
Koegler
REVIEW AGENDA
B.
.
Vice Chair Dallman read the Agenda for January 28,1998.
Dallman approved, Themig seconded. Motion passed 7/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Park Commission Minutes of January 13, 1998
Dallman moved, Bensman seconded, to approve the minutes as amended on Page
3, Item 9, Paragraph 1 change to read, "The consensus of the Commission was to
continue taking turns as Park Liaison to the Council and to inform who will be
attending that meeting in their packet". Page 4, Item B, Paragraph 3, change to
read, "Chair Colopoulos requested the issue of a possible skate park be brought
back for consideration on a new future agenda and to invite Matt Pike back".
Motion passed 7/0.
.
3.
PREPARATION FOR THE PARKffRAIL FORUM OF FEBRUARY 19.
1998
A. NEED FOR AND MEANS OF CONDUCTING A SURVEY
Administrator Hurm reviewed the park/trail surveys that were included in the packet.
Koegler explained that the advantage of a survey is that it is one more tool to use. It will be a third
party, scientific survey. It was determined the questions or areas of inquiry should be as follows:
. Type of trails - integrated vrs. segregated segments
. Trail design
. Physical characteristics
. Environmental impact
. Off street/on street
. What are destinations of pedestrians, activity, age
JJr,1'r
I
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 28, 1998 - PAGE 2
. How would you use a trail
. Demographics
. Value, quality of life questions
. What do residents use parks for
· User fees (should parks be funded by property tax, user fees,
organizations)
. Safety
. Property value questions
. Benefit to residents
. Green space activities
Koegler explained that the company he is recommending to conduct the survey will put together
the questions.
Commissioner Puzak stated the goal of the survey is to ask the community questions that help City
officials determine the ability of a trail system and attributes of the trail system. Additionally, the .
survey would ask questions of residents about other recreational facilities that are underneath the
scope of park/recreation department.
Kroegler recommended hiring Decision Resources to conduct the telephone survey. The cost is
estimated to be around $6,000.
Colopoulos moved, Arnst seconded, to direct staff to prepare to consider
including an agreement with Decision Resources for professional marketing
services to provide a telephone survey on trails within the City. Motion passed
7/0.
B. PUBLICITY FOR FORUM
The consensus was to send out postcards to all Shorewood residents announcing the open forum
to be held on February 19 at the Southshore Center. Commissioners were encouraged to urge
residents to attend.
C. DISCUSSION OF FORUM FORMAT
.
Koegler explained the handout regarding the purpose and process of the forum. This handout is
attached to and made a part of these minutes. The four exercises that will be done at the forum are:
1. Openin~ exercise-initial reaction to what people think about
Shorewood
2. Defmition exercise-defme the existing characteristics that make
Shorewood what it is today
3. Visioning exercise-focus on identifying elements of the
community's vision for the future.
4. Characteristics exercise-will focus on evaluating the
characteristics that were identified in exercise 3.
4. REVIEW OF MEETING DATES
Administrator Hurm reviewed a timeline of upcoming meetings. There were no revisions.
.
.
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 28, 1998 - PAGE 3
5. ADJOURNMENT
Colopoulos moved, Cochran seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:22 p.m.
Motion passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Twila Grout
Parks Secretary
Community Visioning/Input Meeting - February 19, 1998
Purposes of the Community Input Meeting:
1. Provide a forum to gain an understanding of the community's future vision
and specifically, how parks and trails fit into or relate to that vision.
2. Gain an understanding of park and trail issues that are important to the
community.
3.
Gain an understanding of the facilities that people want to see included in
the completion of the Shorewood park system.
.
4.
Help in assembling a list of individuals who could potentially serve on the
Citizen Review Group.
The purpose of the Community Input Meeting is not to:
Solve the trail controversy in Shorewood. That task is the responsibility of the
Park Commission and City Council with the advice and assistance of the Citizen
Review Group.
.
J"t. ..
Discussion Guide
February 19, 1998
Community Visioning/Input Meeting
Park & Trail Planning, City of Shorewood
i'~at Do We Want Our Community to
Be and Mat is the Role of Parks & Trailsr'
1. Opening Exercise - This exercise will be structured as a "wann up" to get an initial
reaction to what people like about Shorewood and perhaps, more importantly, it will
allow them to get to know each other.
.
2.
Deimition Exercise - This.. exercise will defme the existing characteristics that make
Shorewood what it is today. The format of this exercise will involve some individual
thinking and random group reporting.
3. Visioning Exercise - This exercise will focus on identifying elements of the community's
vision for the future. It will include both small group discussions and large group reporting.
The results of this session will yield a r~dom listing of vision elements that are associated
with all aspects of the community. The responses will be separated into two categories: 1)
park and trail elements and 2) other elements. Only the items identified as part of the park
and trail set will be further discussed
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
4.
Characteristics Exercise - This portion of the program will focus on evaluating the
characteristics that were identified in exercise 3. The evaluation will include a group and if
necessary, an individual ranking of their importance.
.
During the meeting, participants will have an opportunity to note comments that are park specific
on sheets that are posted along with the master plan for each park site.
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
666 P02
FEB 06 '98 13:35
PROJECT PROPOSAL
DeeisioD Resources, Ltd.
3128 DeBn Court
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55416
(612) 92()..2401
Fax: (612) 929-6166
To:
Jim Hurm
474-0128
Peter Leatherman
Shorewood Project Costs
Date: February 6,1998
Pages: 2, including this cover sheet
Fax #:
From:
Subjeet:
.
COMMENTS
Decision Resources, Ltd., is pleased to provide this proposal for survey research to you. It is
based upon our previous discussion.
Survey Parameters:
. Park and Recreational Facilities Study
. A Random Sample of Shorewood city residents
. SO Questions Maximum
. Written Analysis of Survey
. Presentation of Data and Findings
Costs:
.
. 300 Random Sample, would be =5.5% in 9S out 100 cases $5.500.00
. 400 Random Sample, would be :5.0% in 95 out 100 cases $6,500.00
. Additional Questions to the Survey would $125.00 per question
A larger sample would allow for more demographic breakdowns, which would provide
the City of Shorewood a more in-depth analysis of survey results.
Company policy requires one-half of the total cost at the time of the approval of the
question PRIOR TO FIELDWORK.; the remainder is due at the time of the delivery of the
Report of Findings.
1t"IoB
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES
666 P03
FEB 06 '98 13:35
Project Timeli"e:
1. One plauning meeting with you and other designated participants to establish topics
for questions. This activity to be completed within two weeks of the initiation of the
contract and may be accomplished in the interests of efficiency, using telephone and
faxes.
2. Structuring of questions and final approval of the survey instrument These activities
to be completed within two weeks of the initiation of the contract.
3. Final determination of the field dates for the interviews and questionnaire approval.
4. Pre-testing and, if needed, approval of resulting revisions. This activity to be
completed by the second day of fieldwork.
5. Computer analysis and preparation oftbe written report. Frequencies of responses
will be pl'Ovided to the client within two weeks after the completion of all fieldwork.
All statistical analysis and prelm,;nary commentary will be available four weeks after
completioD of the fieldwork.
6. Telephone discussion with you and designated participants to explain and discuss
survey results. TIlls preliminary discussion can be arranged at a time convenient for
you and appropriate and/or staff.
7. One meeting with and/or staff in either 'WOrk session or formal presentation to explain
and discuss the results oftbe survey. The final presentation or discussion session can
be arranged at a time convenient for Board members and/or staff after delivery of the
written report. A final written report would be made available within two weeks of
this final meeting.
.
Work Products:
. Report of Finrijngs
. Frequencies of Responses
. Cross-Tabulation Tables
I hope this overview sufficiently covers all the information you require. Let me assure you that .
we believe we can provide your client with timely and reliable information. We look forward to
the opportunity to work with you once again. But, in any case~ best of luck with your efforts.
"
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128' www.state.netlshorewood . cityhall@shorewood.state.net
:MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
15 January 1998
RE:
Telecommunication Facilities - Policy Statement
FILE NO.:
405 (Zoning Code - Part I)
.
In May of 1996, in response to numerous inquiries from telecommunication carriers, the
City began studying the issue of teleconununication facilities, with emphasis on the siting
of cellular telephone antennas and towers. The issue was first addressed in a staff report,
dated 16 May 1996 (see Attachment I, copied in yellow). The decision which came out
of the initial study was that the City's policy regarding cellular and PCS antenna facilities
would be to limit them to existing water tower sites, of which Shorewood has two, rather
than constructing new, freestanding towers.
The City subsequently received applications from two communications carriers to locate
antennas and ground equipment facilities on the water tower site located at the
Minnewashta Elementary School. The applications were met with considerable public
opposition, citing concerns about the proximity of the facility to the school building and
playground area. One of the carriers withdrew its application before the public hearing
was held. The other carrier withdrew its application having heard the extent of
opposition from neighboring residents. Both carriers subsequently located antenna
facilities on a new tower structure which was constructed near the T onka Bay water
tower (Tonka Bay's water tower was too short to provide adequate coverage).
-*'.
~.. PR1NTED O~~ RECYCL:=D P,4PEi1
...
1/.1
u
.
.
"
Memorandum
Re: Telecommunications Facilities - Policy
15 January 1998
While the availability of the T onka Bay site provided an alternative for the two carriers
that originally made application in Shorewood, we will undoubtedly be faced with future
requests from others. Before that happens it is recommended that the City revisit the
entire issue, starting with the use of existing tower space, and also considering possible
other locations (e.g. commercial zoning districts) in which communications facilities may
be located.
At the Planning Commission study session scheduled for 20 January, we will briefly
review the rules by which cities are bound and begin looking at the Shorewood Zoning
map to determine where suitable locations may exist for communications facilities. The
Planning Commission may also wish to discuss the possibility of recommending a
moratorium while the City formulates its policy and any ZoniJ:1g regulations which may
result from the policy decisions. Keep in mind that all the legal advice we have received
suggests that this type of moratorium should be limited to no more than three to six
months.
cc: Jim Hurm
John Dean
Larry Brown
Mayor and City Council
-2-
'1 ' ...rw 'l/S I./:mos S,B>/UQJeuU!W a>fl!1 UO Al!UnWWO:J /fipUap!Say V'
'S~!lm~ mtnRQ:> 'iJU!l!<lNOJd JO l~lJ~ ~ ~A1nI tt~lIlA\ s~p:u ldo~ 10
'1!qlIl01d lOU fiUqs SlU~ti.m.I~AOiJ '(P)I reqt s~ q:>lIlA\ '9661 JO pe suo!l'B~!ununnOO;)I;)J.. ~
Aq paI~A\sutJ U~ ~Allq suo!lSQllb OA\lls.rg: ~ UO!ssn$!p Sltll10J UO!lllUIlOJlI! iJumdmo:> UJ
-l,p~lllpdn ~ S~!A!lOll q:>nS S;)lll{tl~ q~JqA\ ~;) AtK) iJlJ!lSP'~ ~qt Pl.t1OttS . ~
l,~~aI
~ A~ql P{tloqs A\oq os n. l,pooA\aIoqS U! S;)l!S 1~A\01 ~qul<b~ ~J;)ql :iJ.V 'v
l,Sl~A\Ol (llUo!l!ppll ~
Ol utJqt Sl~A\Ol ~lllA\ ;)qt 3t\ 01 ~ l! S! '~A S! ~Aoqll 'Z 10 'I Oll~A\SutJ ~qt n '€
l,(SJd '
'~'n S~!lm~llJ UO!lll~!UUl1Il1lOO A\Oue Ol Almq!suodSaI JlliJ~lll ~Allq Al!;) ~qt ~Oa 'Z
l,oooqd.:lpl Pun
suiJ '~!ll~P Ollll{!UI!S 'S;)~!AJ~ Jll!lU~~ pa1~!sUO~ S~!lm:)llJ .m{tln~ aIV l,(SJd
'~'!) S~!lm~llJ UO!lll~!UffiIIUIO:> A\Oue Ol Almq!suodsax :>!fqnd II ~A1nI Al!;) ~qt Soon . 1
., :~aIppll ;)Q 01 ~ SUO!lS.:lnb A:>!lod.Jlll~A~ lllqt ~~iJns .
SUA\ 1! 'Jll!Sl~AOllUO:> AtJll:>!dAl ~ '~!lmOllJ .I~A\Ol A{.Ill{tl:>p.md 'SUOpll:>OI llUU;)lutJ ~U!S
'l.IlllS II!A\ UO!ssn$!p
~tp ~qA\ S! sm '.I~A\Olll JO UO~n.IlSUOO.1O (S)JaA\Ol.I;)lllA\ mo uo ~ds ~U!SU~I 1;)t[J!~
10J SUO!lll~!fddB Jll!lU;)lod qt!A\ ~OllJ ~ ~A\ ~U!S 'AllW lZ 'AllpS;)nJ.. ~ II!A\ q~JqA\ uo~~s
ApntS ~JnttlJ II 10J ~!dOl ~ ~~$ OllJlllS p;)l~ UO!SS'fWUIO;) iJU!UutJld;)lU 'AllA\-}O
-lqiJ!l ~!lqnd ~ql JO ~n 10J s~!utJdmo~ Al!l!ln g~:> u!2~ OllUOOIW~AOiJ }O Sl!UUfll:>01 .1OJ
~lQ!SSod l! ~){llUI Allm ~~uuq~ A\llJ lU~~ lllqt UO!SSfUIUIO;) ~qt P~!Aplllsnotl ~UO!SSJUIU.JO;)
'UO!l!pPll Ul 'pooA\aIoqS U! s~mOllJ (S;)d) Q:>!AJ~S UO!lll~!UUunuO~ plUOS1OO
iJU!lll:>OI U! P~lS~l;)lU! ~ld~ snopllA Aq ~q::>llo.tddll iJU!;)Q SIAl!;) ~ ~lllA\ll QJll noA sV
I tmd - ~~UllU!PlO ,iJUJUOZ
'-
, SQ:)!Al;)S uO!lll:>!UUU1Wo~I~J..
9661 AllW 91
'U~I~!N pllla:
lpuna;) Al!;) putJ .1OAllW 'UO!ss!U1WO;) iJU!UUlJld
9ElE-vLtdZL9) . LlSB'lEE99 'V.10S3NNIW 'OOONaYOHS . O'VOY gnl~ A~:UNnOOg9L9
(I()()&tI1I()IIS
dO AJJ:l
:ON H'Th:I
:trn-
:3l.va
:wo~
:01.
.
Wfla:.NV>>.ON9Jli
-z.,
,
,
i .
'PIOH IV
UA\Ola A.tnrt
~~ UI!.L .
tnmH Ul!f :~
'i~UI
S ,lqiJIU AllPUOW OllOpcI ~m ~ ~~Id 'fe!l"lllW SJIP '01 ~A!llllaI suo~b AutJ ~Allq UoA n
'lU~UQWlllJ1UP II ~~
ffiA\ ~A\ 'UO!SS!WWO;) ~ql mOlJ uo~al!P OOIOS S1nI J}lllS ~~UQ 's~!lm~J lllfUUQ:> Ol ~A!lllIal
~po;) lUaI.In~ mo JO iJU!lllpdn pU~U1WO~ ffiA\ UO!SS!U1WOJ iJU!UUlJld ~ reql ~~xa S! U
..~
. .
'Sl~A\Oll~lllA\ S ,POOMaIOqS JO ~Uo Uo ~uu~utJ
SJd ~lll:>O1 Ol SaIlsap q~!ltA\ 'lU!ldS SlU~SaIdQI vas 'am AllsnpU! SUO!lll~~:> ~ql
JO ~u aqt reqA\ pUll AiJOIOuq~~ 1UaIm~ ~tp UJllldx~ 01 UO!SS!U1WOJ iUJlIU8Id ~ SSaIppll
01 paI~JJO suq '~UJ 'Vas gU!lu~~ldaI 'nsna llfuos 'SW UO!SS~S APfilS s,lqiJJU AtlpSOOj.10tl
(p~qsnqnd JQA~U lnq ~dOpll) O~1 'ON ~Ull1I1iuo pOOA\~oqs - H!q!tP'H
Slu~maIJn~"H ~po;) POOA\aIoqS-1UaIm;) - H l!ctJqxtl
All A\. -jo-stqiJrn:
~nqfid ~UllW Ol AtpotpnV ~ s~iJual{eq;) lS~A\. sn :Q"H U!l~a;)W'1 - OlN!tJi9:
Sluam~ ~~ llUU~lUV Il~A\Oj.}O S~ldWllXH :~"H om~:w ::>W1- it l!q!ltxH .
Al!lOqlnV iU!Uoz fe:>O'1
JO uo!ldma-QId ;);)tI JO uO!lll.Iap!suo~"H 10J uO!l!l~d QniJ~'l :~"H ~P!l.lV ;)W'1 - H l!<lWXg:
~!Al~S SJd 10j uO!l:laIQS ~l!S :~"H om~w ;)W'1 - a l!<l!tP'H
sQ:>!l:m.Id iJUJUOZ lua.un;) JO AQ~S V :s~!lnplld lll{uIT~;) - SA\~N iJUJUOZ - :> l!q!ltXH
Sl~A\Oj. .mfUUQ;) iJU!l!S U! s~nsSJ: iJU!UUllId fe:>O'l - SA\3N jU!Uoz - a 1!tlrtfX3:
l,SJd S! lllt{A\. - v l!Q!t1x3:
, :iJU!A\OnO} ~ o.m
A\a!AaI .lUOA 10J paq~V 's~!lffi~ S;)d 01 ~A!lllyal UO!lllWlOJU! ~I!dmo~ Ol uniJ*l ~AlltJ aM
9661 AllW 91
S~!Al~S uO!lll:>!t1ItuflUO~IQj. :~
~
.'
~.
aAOW"~' '~~~ot'
i,,;~: ~Qr&Jf'~_ivl'
:: __=;;~~~~~::>i\ }~;;;{:~~':K:~' ~ > >~1;>" ,. >,
.
'anUflUOO 111M SUOl1rotunwmoo SS\}I~IM
JO lflA\OJI~ am'~as s:>d-t\\OOJOJ
SSOOOJd julSU~1 pue UOJltiOOlfff wllJ'POOs
SI::Xld aQ1 JO uonatdwoo am 1I11M 1uetSlS8e
1B1~1P leOOSJad e sa (pns SOOJAJ3Smep
pue OOIOA aUlQWOO lI:l!lIA\ spnpoJd sa 1laA\
sa Blep allQOwpue 'X9d SBalaJ!^\ 1utodala1 .'.
sa liOns ~ ~ A\au apWlJd Oll\epol'
S'lslXa ;QfolouqoaJ, 'UOnnlOAaJ S8alaJIA\ e
JO ~u,uu!t.xl alll ^,UO seA\s!Q11ng 'spnpoJd
XBJ pue SJ~ed 'sauoqd aIqetJod 'sauoqd
Jeo 10 uon:>npoJ1ul aQ1 IUIA\ ~Jawa S:>d
JgnHOJ~
SWl~~
mu :S8d
...
.
1/I1ltlll.'/,'/1 .IlIl>ljlI,II,'./ /l'III1SI./,J
IN/lI1. S.l/J.~ ~II!/J,' I/!~' I!/IMII/flfl :11/1r!J J.IIIIYI
\$I,I/IS../.IJ/U '/."""I.I.-/II11",;,'IJ:4 'V.l/ JoIllJl'l
oIlIfll/d Jl,.,II//J.1 'S:t:t:U-Ir:/.tllt/S :N.I/ J.Jdd}
:solOllll IJSIJ! .uW:J
.
.
.
.
'llIIO!ltr.lfUJIIIHIO: IftIIOSJJd . ....101\ fJR
'l!J!J.UU\ JO UOneJodJo:)iuOS "JUI tIUOfll3!UllIIIIHY.) SSJU!tIIIO ~~ WI p.uolIIOds
'IXKl\fJIlQlll1FlU P. .Ill sndlWJ ~Ursnq I1SR l(JIlS lIeJ./ll JlllllJlllfl P.llIIJdIlII! pu!~!lIq 1I!IIJ.\\.\UJ1!W!Jd aq III
Ihlledpnoo a.re \9d SSJIJJ!.\\ JIlJ lIeJJl! ;)jjeJa\lY.) 'Rare JiIwa\llJ ~ P. \I!llI!.\\Jq,\elu JqS JIl .llIJ.l\o1Llq.\\SftItl ~
pUP. ,)'few IllOQ 01 ,)fCIl! J.lSI1 .)qlll1~\\ 'SSJlpJ(J.l .llI 111M 1~ .lUllqd .;JtU.. ~,~ pue JIIftU ~
SP. IIJ1lS Jp~\ljJd\I1UJJJ1IJ S.llKlIIIbl.)I.lJS.JU!S\llI do~ It!IlllWlQll;)J dIIIell JtJ1 .1p!,\O.IllII!-\\ .lJj.\IJIl \lId Sll.)p.ln\1t!Ill
p,}IJ,ldX.) SIll ';moqd,}l.ll SSJU!SIlQ ss;)f.)J~\\ 11 ,\~ ll!q.l!q.\\ .lJj.\hIll S:ld II S! \id ~\\ - \1Id ~"
'Rare U\\OIU\\Op JIl snctuJe:) SS<l\I!SfIQ II lie lpII8.lI:ldll ~\OO IfI!IIISllIJIQ\\ ll$.'IlI!SlIlI e se lplll! lIIIKIJ'j "* .,\jJd
JOj mnq Jq 01 pJlJ.)dX.l JJll S\\'1 ~,\\ 'SJSeqtl1l!p 01 pue ~ .LlI(IO 01 SIUllJS!S.'le "" p!tI(ll/JJtt pue lU;JJICIluoJ
JfQlllJOd lie QJns ~\JjJ JIlJ SUOIIJ;lUUO.l SSJldJfA\ ~wd (SSV1) .~ eJJ\' f!J01 ~t\\ -11\\'1 ....
'~ ;Jft1IpRe JO,IaJlIIlfJl JIl "*.1015 ~ .;JtU. -.... ~
'~ 00ll!A IIOf1OUI pue .lJ!04 10 .I:lJSIIl!.l1 pile a.ro'll.JfllOJ'l.W .lIU.- .... .tliJfR
';)JIJd Ja\\O! e III 'SJ.d POll Je1IIII;)J lie If.)llS ~.s:M J3IPOlII!If1- samJll~ J,)."J.l. pue tlWI__
.I;}J1ew5 JaAOO II~\\ ~\JJS lU~11t!1ll pJJlld!agOll 1Il11 "\IlIOlllP1OU JjIIOJIJolId lie Il.lIlS s.lJf,\;lp ~ pue fJO)UI)(td
P1J11'pueq qino.np SUOIJll.l!URIUIIIOJ llJIlP pUll ,fJjQ\,\eM M\1 JO. JIIO~ .1p!.\O.Ill1lllJ Il!Ill .Ja!AI3S s:M r - ...........
'J.)QIlIIU -fI1lO&I:lCI
S,JJSn .)111 pUI! 'luamied JO ~ 'p;lft.lueq 91183 .)UOqdJl.}ll1.,. PfIIOA\ ml.)l!1,\lOlf .lpIIpUI pptO.) IIIl!1lJIIIJOJU 9!IU.
'SlUll1SfS8e le1tJw fllUOSJJd pue '8Qllldmoo ~ 'SiJIIOqd.ma pue ~ SlltpllS SOKlI-~.SlIOIJll:)IlIlI
01 J,}Sn S,pJlla JIll lIDtpJtmJJ lIOI1euuojUl lID!JJ3J1ft1lJJ1 pUll _IS 10 ~ ~\ap ~ IIfl'W f - lUI'J ..s
.~~ JO~ISJJ
e lie q:ms lIO!leJOf Jlqde.JllOOj lllOU pull OOSJad I! 01 ~ 911t!1ll JJqW1IU ~I V -~. JIIII&Ad
'8UOl1I!JOI ~ ooql J.llI1llJ.Jfdoad JlJP.lds 01 ilOftllULIOJUI
pull 811e;) S,}lnOJ pue S~JI?Jl qJ\l/.\\ s'}~~S S:Jd ;woe ,iq ~ Jq.\em ItIIJ JJDJll~ f - ,(..... ~
~ suon
.e;)!unWWOO ll1ep pue ~J!O:\ 1I1~ >>uo)e uavo '~ep t IIIOJJIJOflI?IIUOJII! ltIJt,\JfJW JO .\QuallJllP Sll QJRS llUOf13UDJ
J.llndWOJ SWJOjJOO lem J3!A3P PI3II J>UllII V - ........" ~ f8II8lI>>d .Ie I.tI8JS!Ht' ... pIlU' r .....
'~.\OJ JfJIt\\-IlO!JllU lID!JflJlO &I3fl!AWII1IJ!jed UlS 111~\\ *" .\JJ.\ .lIlJ ~ .!OJ ~ ~
<lJ!.\J,}S JlQdll,)jW9 'J~ II! 1I11lq II QlI.\\ JJ1ndwoo do1deI I! se tpIlS flJ\.\olP. e .10 JJlled e 01 'JJjSIIWIl!1llIl I! JIl '3iIess;)w
JlUOJ1J;)!a .10 ,}J!O.\ 11 Sl? qJnS SIIOlJll:lIUDWWOJ I11UPPUll 0010o\ ,W,\\ tlUU .\JIeW!Jd S.1p!.\OJd Il!Ill Cl.1f.\J.)S s:M V - ......
';)I!WISJI?J PUll lID~ .WA-oA\l PUll .\e.\\-.lIIO qJOq pue ~ l!1llIl1\l!lJlld
luoomjpJf.\\OlIJ!JI? .\e.\\oOJ\\1 1u!ied ,}J!(),\ Jl;)JUt'MplJ. apllfJUI 01 ~ .).Ie lIlII1 S.lJ!.UJS .. S3.11I... t ft "'"
'flP~\\-PI.lOA\ aq UaACl .\eW pull S;)JW3S S:Jd !SOW II!lfI ~Jq 01 p.lJfldpj1ue S! ~ .33!AJ3S
J!qde~ 'I!ew ;)J!o.\ pUlllhJn!l!.\\ IIllJ lie q:ms llaJIl'IWj ~.It~\\ SJJj.\J.lS J1IlIJI8S 3J!IIOI{ JeljI ~
S! 11 'SJfllndwoJ ~ooq.lIOU lie q:ms S;)J~\Jp OIDI Jl31eJOdJOJul smpow SSJI.).I~\\ pue 'SiJIIOqd Pl.llI1JlII!II 'S31JII31fIS
lIDfSII SlIOI1llJIUOWWOJ ll1ep pull flJ!OA ,\e.\\-oMt ~ 01 ~)Ildpnue S! 1I!If1 .lJj.\J.lS S:>d V - ~.1118 .....
'SUO!IllJ!Idde S:>d l!1llIl JOJ ~
lIInq SlIJOA\lJU Sf? IId\\ sl1l1fVS3 pul1 'Jll11;)1es _W 'SJ.d 'JlIDfI;)J SllIfJllS ~I 10 JaqIIIIIU ll.iq p;lpt!ll)Jd
aq OllJ SJJ\AJ3S ll1ep ,}llqOI~ 'SJSl?Qll1ep PUI1 'S!UlJ'IS!SSll _ flJOOSJad '~1ndWOJ auowe ~ 0iJP!.\ ,~
pull '~ ,}JlQ\ '1XJ1 jO UO/l\1J\UIllIJWO.) SSJIdJfA\ ,~ .1p!.\OJd 01 p;l1J;ldxJ ll! lIlII1,}Jj.\1a8 S:>d V" ............
'SJf>IlS JO 'S;)JII'jald 'S,}WJ lie qJllS SJJeWl nns 10 1JO!SS!UI9Ull.I.;JtU. -1Ju!IaII
'SJJllIS JJ\18J pue 'S;lJlIIIIOJ '~ RAOO
.iew POll '~Jel.\JJ.\ aq 01 PJ100!JllUI1 JJll seaIlJ afieRAOO ,}JfAJ3S ~ 1Ul1!l1\\ nea PUll new .JJ!OA se q:ms
SJJRlfr.lj ~JuellUJ .iuew J;)lJo 01 p;ll:hldxa 8! lIWS3 '~IOU JtlIO,Q.)ilfCl poo SJ.1IIldUlOO.lf(Ill1.IOd se IpllS ~
OIU! ~II1JOl.1JoJU! SWJf>OWS~\\ qjnOJlll pull sauoqd P<)lUOOID Jea pUll PIJII..pueq QB.Rn SlIO\IIJ!IIIlUIllJIlP
pUP. .lJ1OA .\11.\\-0,\\1 J;)JIO 1I~\\.1I'!II1 ;)J~\JflS S:>d Jl31ed1Jl1Ull Uf" ... ...,. ... ~ JOOIIIIIIII'd
.~ uaU!J!A 10 .llteJo1S PUll J.ljSUllJl Jf\IOJ13.JI.} .MU.- I'lIt'.4
'uo!lllWJOJIIlIll1lllP JO I11UP 10 J.}Jsue.n ~ alU. - ~uas ..,.
'8alP.1S JJ!l1kl pOll 'S,}!1unro 'sarIlJ JaAOO uea PUll '_ ,\JIM J./lI ,}Jj.\hIll JIIfIIfPJ JOJ seam ~
.l!qdll~ 'iU!1!Il.\\ III1J pOll lleUJ ,)J!O.\ Sll q:ms S3JIIJllClJ fWU8IIU3JJjJO 00;) JllIfIlfJ:) ~IOII ~ pue
SJ,}lRdwoa dOldlll SP. qJns s'}J~\Jf> OIUI 1Jd1llJodJooUl sumpow ~'4 ~ PUll ~ Pd1lJlIOW JeJ pue 'JfQll1JOd
'PlJllilU1111 qjnOJql suo!l\1J\unwwoJ I1lep pul1 .lJ!(1\ Ae.\\-(),\\'\ ~\OJd It!Ill .lJ!.\hIll s:ld V - ~WS JIIIIIP.)
'SiJOIAJ3S
l?lP.P poo ;)J!O.\ IIl1!i!p ;).\l1e\llUUI JO .\1;}!JP..\ JfJIt\\ 11 Jf>IIl:l\l! SJaIAJ.l8 s:>d pIIl!IjflI!WS - S3.I .lW\..Ie ............
'UOISSlWWlY.) SIIO!1lJJ\lIflU fl!J3p;l1l JIll ,iq ~ pull pClllilplse ~j
JO ~OOJ Jp~\\ I! Ja\o ;)1l?JOOO SJ.l!.Yp PUll S1f.lOA\lJu s:ld 'UO/1IlJOI JO I~ JJllJfIlDIIItIOJ 01 ~~ PUll
JldoJd ;)IQeU;) lP.1I1 SJJ~ \JJS suo!lI1J!unwwOJJI.l1 jO ml?J peOJq V - fs:M} SiU!U"S -neJf Id'J II"~
SUIJ~AJ1snptiJ S~ 01 ~PJIl~
..
~~
)
.....1......_... .......1.
Sill.. c........ low....
:By Mkhel/e Gregory
In coming months, commutLiUes may lose the right to regulate the
siting of cellular telephone rowers. just as that industry is emerging
3$a major J$.yer in the larger telecommunicatioosindusrry, The
Cellular Tel<<amml.lJ1icariol1$ Indusny Association (erIA) filed a
petition with the Ftderal Communications Commission (FCC)
last.OeI;ember that asks for federal preemption oflocal zoning
poWets over cellular cransmission facilities. This issue of ZDning
NewJ aLmsl'O acquaintlota.l planners with the impaas. real and
'.~~c::=::"~o:~::::==e:d
to provide a. sum.llWy of siting COD$ideratioDL
Planners should undemand rhat so~ jurisdictions regulate
cellular towers sp<<ifically. while others have regulatiOl1$rhat
apply to "communicatiol1towers' generally. Wherever possible,
we have tried to cuD ecamples of regulatory tedmiques specific
to cellular rechaology. These varying.degrees of specificity also
exist ~ the regul.atioas. of maay state communiariol1$ and
'"'\ public utilities agencies, Planners should learn their state's
J bunr:aucratic mua::ure ud its definition of commutLication
cowen befo~ dtafting Joc:al regulatiol1$,
Representative$ of the cellular indUStry were also consulted
for this.artick. In contraSt to the tone of the CI1A petition.
many expressed an capmess to work with APA and.local
communities to educate planners aod citizens toWUd the
deve1opmcntof safe. fair. and informed regulations.
~e~ded the radio specmun available to the
public:in order to make room for budding cellular tdecommu-
nkuions reehnology. Through dte mid.-1980s. dte industry
workedro develop higber-quality transmission devices, Cellular
tec::hnology wasfim marketed to COOSW1lelS in dte form of the
car phone. It presented Joc:al pverDlnems with the phenomena
~ ctl1ula.r telepbone antennas and the. toWerS On which they are
mowned-rowers that hac:l to be crected. soDle"N'here in the
cormn_ty. Unlike grouad-wiredrelcc:ommunications. cellular
tec::hnology made itpouib1e for a caBer to and while commu-
nicating with 'someone at a conventional ~ or with
another mobile user. Cellular rechnoloar. explained in greater I
detail below. operates Oft a fixed number of channels that share ~
the same radio waves. As a mobile U$Cl' passes through" cells"
that parcel the landscape into a rransmiuing grid. the aller's
connectiotl is "patched" from oae eellanrenna to the nen.
'.. Twenty y~ later, personalcommuniation services (PeS)
~:~~=~;;~~=:=.~=~o:
J January 1993 issue of ~ ~ reponed that cellular
technology added an average of 7.300 users per day in 1992,
bringing the U,S, toW to about 10 A'1illion, Tbosenwnbers
have continued to grow, reaching more than 24 million by the
JJ:..
-:>-
:.-.- ,
t_tJ'-.
end oflast year. That. in turn, has expanded the number of
cellular ttansmission sites to 17,920 last December from JUSt
384 a decade earlier.
In response to both the increasing demand for mobile
cornmutLication options and a very aggressive lobbying effort by
the industry. the FCC opened another portion of the airwaves for
indusny use. On March 14. the agency completed the biggest
auction in U,$, history. lasting three months and costing
telecommunications carriers $7 billion. The airwave rights were
divided geographically into 99 licenses that went to commercial
mobile radio service (CMRS) carriers nationwide, The licenses
were awarded to the highest bidders among a combination of
older and newly formed companies. The FCC will auction more
licenses later this year to accommodate private mobile radio
service (PMRS) c:anitrs, which serve freight transpOrt~. public
safety entities, citizens band radio. and ham operators, Tbe newly
licensed carriers are already acquiring sites for towers and their
accompanying equipment buildings. Where a market exists for
cellular commutLications, local government must be prepared to
, deal with siting issues,
! The industry's growth
! bas outpaced many local
I governments' ability to
i understand the impacts of
I cellular towers and,
I therefore, to properly site
! and regulate them, The
I situation is further
! complicated when residents,
... I expressing alarm over the
I aesthetic and reported
I health-related effects of
[cellular rowers, prompt
"I hasty. reactionary
i regulation, To avoid writing
! bad law. some communities
have instituted siting
moratoriums until they have
ample opportunity to
research and formulate
regulations that are fair to
both the community and
the indUStry,
Both trends have put
carriers on the offensive,
Thwarted by local "learning
curves" and "regulatory
barriers"in their eftOlU to break into new markets. they bave
sought powerfUl remedies. The CTIA petition argues that the
supremacy clause (scaion 332) of the 1934 Federal
Communicatlons.AJ:.tauthomes preemption of state and local
regulation of cel1u1ar ~ siting, APA. in a letter to tbe FCC.
expressed opposition to such preemption. In March, executive
director Micbad Barker told the FCCthat local communities
and planners are inthehest position to balance their concerns
with the needs of the cel1u1ar industry, The Narional
~
L '. Cimulttj14geJ ceo.J.r
~U1er:.. sJMtio" ,..
I .. izesthmc "';"g imus
t"f
Exhibit B
,s;:
.~.
Association ofTdec:ommunications Officers and
Administrators, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National
League of Cities, and the National Association of Counties have
&led similar objections.
NA.........,ec.....-.Y
Low-power mobile radio communication. also known as cellular
communicatioQ. is accomplished by linking a wireless network
of radio wave transmitting d.evices (portable phones, pagers, or
car phones) to the conventional ground-wired communications
system (telephone lines) through a series of short-range,
contiguous cells that are part of an evolving cell grid.
For example, a portable pbone transmits a signal to the
nearest cellular antenna. The call is relayed from the antenna to
the nelrest land-based telephone line or microwave disb, and
then to a central switching computer. From there, the call is
sent to its destination. either a land-based telepbone via the
land-based line or another mobile communication deviCe via the
doBest cellular antenna.
Cans can originate or be received from a wireless source
becaUBeantennas share a fixed number of frequencies across the
cellular grid. In other words, while a caller may dial her destina-
tion numberfiom within the radius of one cell antenna, sbe may
traVel into the radius of another during the call. The call proceec1s
uniQterrupter;las the transmission is "patched" from one antenna
tOthenen. While the caller is moving. the cellular antennas are
automaticaUy locating an unoc:cupied frequency on the next
antenna. dwI enabling continued transmission.
When a caller cannOt successfiilly place or maintain a call.
either he is out.of range or the nearest antenna is at full
capacity. CtJ1ular tower technology differs from satellite,
microwave, or land-based communications in that it is based on
a netWOrk of short-range cell sires with a fixed capacity. If the
cells are norJinkcd by cellular towers, microwave dishes. or
ground-wi.n:d toWet'St transmission will fail. Similarly. if a cell is
crowded by too many users. it must be "split" into twO cells.
eachbavingil$own radius; thus, only the cellular antennas of
separate carriers can share space On the same tower. It is
physically impossible for a single carrier to deliver service
~ ifirs antennas are not dispersed.
Mostloal regulations require that all tecbnicallyavailable
space on exisn.ag rowers within the jurisdiction be used before
new' towers are erecw4. In other words. cellular carriers must
lease space to other carriers on their towers; the cellular industry
c:onsiders this leasing arrangement to be a less-than-idea1
solution. As the demand for cellular wecommunications
~ cells ina given area must be subdivided, or additional
carriers.mtISt be permitted. to operate there. The end result is the
need fOr more towers.
,..... .... Ante__
Toweu may neecito mnge in height from ;0 to 200 feet so . that
anteIW& can overcome the challenges posed to commutLic:ations
by local topopaphy. The required beigbt is usually propottional to
a combination of the distance antennas can cover and the demand
within their ntdiw. Higher towers gmerally cover a larger
geopphic ~ but have a lower service demand. and are known
as cmuage ..Shorter towers. known as capacity sites, cover
_Ier.ara.s with a more concentrated demand. Tower height can
also vary --~;P$ to engineering requirements for a specific site
or the technical capabilities of the antennas being mounted.
In addition to dedicated, free..sranding cellular towers
(monopoles). tbcteare guyed towel'$ (anchored with guy wires)
2
i
and lattice, or self-isuppott towers, wbichhave three or four
sides of open-frambd steel supportS. Some cellular antennas can
occupy space on other types of communication towers when the
engineering is ~ble. This is kn~ as using a donor site to
troubleshoot a sm~ gap or dead spot within the grid. A micro-
cell or repeater fadlity is installed on a preexisting tower to
ensure that transmissions within that area are dear. Antennas
can also be placed ~n rooftops and other building features if the
building' sheigbt ~ accommodate their service area. In
addition. antennas have been mounted on silos, water tanks.
windmills, and sm~kestacks. As cellular use proliferates and tbe
technology imptovts, the trend toward shorter toWers and less
obtrusive mounting fixtures is likely to prevaiL
Antennas are of P1tee types: omnidirectional, directional, and
microwave. Omni~onal antennas, also called whip
antennas, serve a 3<i<J-degree area. Directiooal antennas. also
known as pand an~nas or rectangular antennas, are used to
achieve transmissioJil or reception in a. specific: direction.
Microwave anten~ are.used to link different types of
telecommunicatio~ f.u:i1ities, such as when a portable phone
user calls a conventional telephone number.
...
.
;-
ScreenJ..., Lafttlscaping,. .... ....des
The most common objection to cellular toWers and antennas is
their aesthetic itnpact. Residents. many of whom use the
technology. do not want to see the towers cluttering their
landscape or degrading property values. Planners and indusny
professionals have gone to great lengths to screen, conceal. and
ser back towers and their associated buildings. All the
ordinances reviewed contain some SOrt of requirement for
maintaining existing vegetation or installing landscaping for tbe
purpose of screening the base of the rower and the stOrage
building. Towers can also be camouflaged to blend with the
SUtrounding environment through the use of color. materials.
and design. For instance, Jefferson Parish. Louisiana. requires
that all cellular toWers be disguised as trees:
1. The entire facility must be a.esthcricaIly and ardUtecturalIy
compatiblt: with its environment. The use of ~rial1y
compatible materials such as wood. brick, or stUCl:O is
required for associated SUpport buildings, which :rhalI be
designed to architeaurally match the exterior of rc:sidenrial
Structures within the neighborhood. In no case will metal
exteriors be allowed for acxcssory buildinp.
2. The tower itself must be of such design and treated with an
architectural material so that it is c:amoufbscd to resemble a
woody tRe with a single aunk and branches on its upper part.
)
Setback distances can be guided by aesthcric and safety
concer1U. Most are expressed as a percentage of the tower
height. In the Pensacola,. Florida, ordinance, the setback serves a
primarily aesthetic purpoae:
mhe distance between the base of the. collUDllnicaDoas toWelS
and any residential zoning district or any hismrical or
architeCtUrally significant building must equal 2Operc:ent of the
tower height.
Safery-oriented serbacks establish a clear zone for f.a.Uing
tower debris or theworsr-<:ase scenario, the tower's collapse.
Falling zones for towers vary with their design. At most, they
will collapse to a distance equal to their full height, but many
are designed to collapse first toward theirhase. The Oldham
County. Kentucky, setback provisions are designed with falling
Zones in mind:
~
Ire OJ Ju~w~:JUnouu~ I!llUl ~g!lJ~ ~ ~u~ HtlW $3ur.>!fdd~ J:>MOJ
'1:]'!JOI:I ',uunoJ ~ wreduI 'g!~~ tpn$ tp!A\w:>pUEJ U!
p~dol~~P <XI PJTlolJs sUO'!Jt:{~J {lOOn '~A\OJ ua ;l:JOOS iU!Jt:lJs
:>(q1:1!ns )0 ,umqt:J!l:At: ;ltp iupp.u J~ :>jq!suodgJ UO!5'!A!P
SUopr.>!Unwwo:> :>11:1$ JO twO!S:>J :np :>ureu S;l;)U'l:U!PJ0 Atrew
"iu!J1nJ$ PA\03Uo SUOPt:1!WH J:>.:I
Atre ptre 'uop:>n.usuO:l .M.:lU put: UOp~jO:> )0 SlSQ;) ;lApuedwo:J
;ltp 'gpmqpoowo:>U! f8:l~P JO 'J1O!lm{:lQW 'SlthJW;lJ!nb:>.t
1QB ~!AJ~ :l!tfd~ ':a:l~~1u!.bu;mb:>J) O!peJ
',up-ed1o rmmnns S,,gA\03 :>tp ':I:)tds xe:>{ 01 ,umqt: S,J:>UA\O
J:>A\01 ;ltp 'SJ:>A\01 iup~ uo :l:)1lds :J~~t ~npu! ,umq!S1::>J
:>tJ!ULl~ 3mp $1~:i 'xn p;,.relJS .10 UOP1!:)010:l UO :J:ltreU!pJO
:>tp JO UOp:l:>S t: U! Awmsn '$1;)A\01 iuf1~ UO ~s iU!Jt:lJs JO)
gnU:>At: :Jlq!ftOd lre1sn~ 01 S3tn:>!tdde :u!"baJ gp!unwwo:J
lS0W 'uo~JOJd J:>A\01 :>z'!W!U!W ~1 .l:>pJ0 UI "IUIp17:1fJ!O;)
...PIA..... ......-'5 ".'NO
'(L
.. ~.^IIC1Ul1OJ. .. ew
~~~UOJ ~n-pue7 pile
...... ... "mt~1 sVd lfnsuo:) 'I
> ..01 S:Iw3uo UO~u! 'alOW JO::!1(t861 IU01~2"OSSV
llujUUtld UD!JaW\I ~08e)!1I)) llJ'l)SdJ A.ur) put! U!'fOO8
^JJa1W8 ,(q 'WA\OlA1 pw owe, Bu!lelnBa~ ivg(#
~ sVd S! SJaMOHJO!S!Aajal put! ()JpeJ JO uo!teln8al
. 3tp uo UOfteWJOJU! leJaUaB JO} &:>.I00s poofl e 'SUO!l2j
-!unwwo:J .leJnl~ JO 1U&Ape 3tp satElp;OO ~! 48nolJ.1.
..'l661 'sa:>!Aa(J SUOIle:>>!unwWO)!J3tp() put! sauolfd
-ate 1 at!CJOWpu2 &JqeUod JO} SJlICl!:1 .buanba.lJO!P'!lI
Olalllsodlg U1!WnH" '~U&~ u<m!sod 3331 '*I. ;as
oslV -OO6rZt9-ZlZ :9(001 AN '>!-,OAiMaN!.\lS PUZl>"M
11 'CQn!!1SUI splepu~ Il?UO!ll?N u~J&WV WOll.l&pJO
'(Z661-r.S6) 3331/!SNV) tM~W pile :J~/8J:J
:JpauBewOJlJa/3 snopJettH ^/Ie!1u<JJOfI JO wawamseaw
alp JOJ &:JfPeJc/ papuawwo:>>~ S! tu~n:>op ISNYIIlj&Sl1
JatPOUV "(11661-1'S6) :B3I/!SNV!Sl? uo!t J
Z661- 1'S6") 333VISNV) Z661 'zH~ OOf OU' .
:J!lauBeuJO.JJ:JaJ3 huanbaJ;;I O!Pl?l 01 alnsodx3 U~H 01
padsa~ I.f1!M SJCMa7 A1aJPS JOJ plefJUf!JS" 1331 u!~' !BU3
S,)!UQJ1:>&13 pul! ll!j!J1:>&13 JO &.m!lsliJl 3tp JO. · ... ..
3tp p&!.jS!lqnd Sl?lJ ~nmSUI SPJePUtJSI!uil~l
U2:>!Jaw\f &tp 'SJaMC>> Jl!lnltaj Bums JO~.. SU<!,~ ... :...
8u!doJtMap U! Sl~wUJ&A08 le:>of!lSlSSl? 0 ~ .
,
· · · S:lW~ UO
UO!leWJoJul aJOWJO:l
's:IW3 iU!Z!UOI-UOU .:>m 3'etp S~!J3snpU!
tp!.M. p:l3'e~ S}'e1lP!A!pU! ptre suopeJqdJo:>iuI1U3$:>Jd:u dnoJS
3!:JO.1duou t: Sf V33 'OL.OI-Z~y-ZOZ !~~OOZ :>0 'uo3iu!,qS'e&
'~ h3S PJfZ ~~Z1 'UOpt:poss'V ~u3 :>!,m1~WOJJ:l:>13
:>tp 31nsuo:> A'eW $1~uut:rd 's.:IW3 03 SUOpr.>!unWWOj .refTIIl:l:>
JO d!1{suop'epJ :>\]3 3noq'e UO!,3'eWJO}U! :uOW JOd '1UOlWUJ~Aoj
~ :>tp .(q pOIlUS! ,g~ ;ue ~lp )! sP.reptmS3UOlSUlJJS
:uow AJddt: .(If8:lP'eW03Dt::mp SUO!~OJd OlpnpU! 's,A1un~:>
qt:WOUlJTlW ~!J 'S;l;)tm1!PJO ~wos 3'e~ p:l30U <XI Pl"OlJS JI
.~ U'eq.m U! <)y S'e :>p3!J S'e SOlW!3~WOS
'S5:>I JO J:>A\OO JO S111Va\ 00 1 Sl!W~ ~J!S If:>:> f8:l!cLU ~tp 'S11t:M
~
i
000'00 t OJ dn suOptO$ 0!J>'Cl repJ~W~ pu-e '$3384\ UOHI!W~
01 dn Sl!W:! J:>M03 UO!~Y:!l 'e:lJ!lL1\ ~r ~Ai\od lS:>h\OI OllJ) 3t:
;l1'eJ:>rlO AIlr.>!cLU SJ:>h\01 .rep1IJ4r.> 'S:l!1!JP'lJ iup1!WStre,U Ire JO
.g!:>u:anb:>Jj sno!JllA :It: iupuOOo ,
SJ;lA\01 WOJ) ~modx:> 113IN)0.~ :Jlq1Ucb:l:lt: 1U:lSOlJd
hlp ':U:>lJ 1SH 03 p..y!t:J4IP 001 qinolfJ. '!1u~:u!nb:>.tJll^OJdd'e
PUl: ss:r.lOJd ~!~ J!:Jtp O1U! sp.repmm ISNVOltp~1UodJo:>U!
POl~!~ ~A\ SOl:JtreU!PJO 3lp )0 AtreYf'(€ :lied uoxoq :l3S) snNo01
UOpllO!Unwwo:> JO nd.U Ire JO} spnpum SU~ bu:mb;)Jj
O!peJ :Jfq1Ud:>::r.re '<rrmO!sr:ljOJd J~ 3Wptu} sptcpU'lDS f'lQOP'eN
u-e:>!J:awy 3\]3 uo JU!. ;ue dp!UDWWO:> AU1lW'3WPU1ll)W
~lp U! '10'1 ~$ tpm iD!dopA:>p '! buaiy UOp>>JOJd
p:1U;)wuO.l!^ua'S'n :xu 'U~ P:XU!wa-btr.m~-o!fC1
01 :unsodD :l!lqnd :lJC}t:l~ ~o:> S! It:1Jh\ JOj ~~
f'eJ~ f'eJ:lu:a.i OU :uIl :u;np Apu:u.m::> '~p1lOJq uO!~ru
:IHn JO} pxn AJ~ 'ftreq hu=mbay qirq:OWJD (ZHW)
ZJJ:)~w 0061>08 :ltp lJ! s;neJ:XJo.W3Uh o!)JeJ .rep11F' :nu
':>JIls A~dmo:> :>q 01 amp u:>AOJd m:r ~
:lgpUOJPS 00 'X!~n ~~P JO b!JP1':J ~wwo:> :mynlF'
t:Aq p:>JeJ:>u:a.i SP~{ llaIN:ltp ptre Ja:lU1b u:l:JAU:>q uopt:pWO)
'm:>:!ds 'e UA\olJs m:r '<pms :JY!lu:>ps ON ~I :IW'3 iu~
;l1~JOlU~ 1mp S;l;)tre!Idd'e w:>pomJo ~!,.reA 'e tp!.M.. p:>dd!1\~........
:u): SOlWOlJ 1SOW ~ Sf SflJ.I. ;nmos:Im :>JiU!S t03
siu!PUY J!~tp ~111J0S! 01 :Jfqeuo :U:ll\\ btp xn~ ~A!snpUO:JU!
PUOO) u~ osre ;)At:q 'S'eUU~tre uO!31O!U"unuo:> PUl: mJ!} J;'M\od
)0 iU!J!,s :>tp 01 uop!soddo U! f';lJP uOllJo 'S:l!pn:tS ~ <,g~A\()H
':r.unos .:IW'3 tre OJ b!lU!XoJd ~ U! S1f!A!f tmpJ!tp iuotull
J:>:>u-e:> )0 s=l:>U:lPpU! J~ 01 ~ PP9 :>P:J.W~I:l
SU!Z!UO!-UOtJ P:qtJ!{ Mm:f tp!lJA\ jO OlWOS <g!Pn1s
000'1 tretp :UOW ~J:mpuo:> 0lAt:q SJS!1thJ!:lS '6L61 ~:>u!S
"10lJ on1l:U:> 01 'S1:>.lfUt:{q
:>!l~P JO SU;)AO ~A\WI.o.o!W JO ;mo.;np UJ 'JO UO!1'8WJOjU! J
hAUO:l OJ PJll>>JOW)O UO'!JeJq!'A alp WOJj p:l11U:>-d.{jj:nJ~ -
sm:>u.req.3! 'pe:>1SUI '$VO! S'e I1I401nI ~ :JAp:>QI ~lJ
WJ~ 01 s=l~IOW ptre SW031l WOJj $V~:Jt:p dp1S 10U I:IOp ~
:mt~ f1'9J:>A\od SSOl{ fW~$UO:) S! 'iuopq SUopm <'l1!}p111S pOl!
'S'eUU:J1tre iupSr::lp1:OJq A.L ptre onm 'g:)~ UO!1r.>~unuo:>
J'e{nyp:> tp!lJA\01 A.JOi~'e:l:>tp 'UO!11I!P'eJ iu!Z!uO!-UON'sAllJ
'ewttrei ptre sAeJ-X gpnpu! uopt:!PE.l ~OI ~.1lO :>!S'eq
:;;~~1~~:~~~~~:~~1=='~=~~~.
.refTIIl:>:> )0 iup!s ~tp 01 UOP!soddo A1!UOWWO:l JO :r.unOS1g~
puo:>~ ;ltp ~ ;lAt:q s:IW'3tp!^" J':>l-eposSt: S1JS!J lJJ~lJ :>lJ.I.
..... ....-.......11
'uop'e:l!fddt: J;)M01 A.z~ tp!^"S!sAyt:ut: (lfiIIW
UOP'e!PeJ :.l!3~.WOJ]:>;)T:> iu!Z!UO!-uou onafdwo:> t: SOl.f!11b:>J
~jtreU!pJO ,uuno:> UOSJ~f"'lJ.I. '.wAC] N.:nJ "'tp '<'1 p~lt:.mU~
(S.:IW3) SPP9 ;)!l~uS'eWO.I1>>I:I ~tp OJ p:lJ'epJ suO!S!AOJd :rgp:>ds
:lAt:q Ire 'u03iu!lJS'e& 'bunoJ iU!)J ptre !uoi:>JO'A1unOQ
qt:WOU1JTlW :OPeJOYO::> 'buno:> UOSJ:>JPf :.Uuno:> umqPlb
'UO!]'e!PeJ :lp;luiew~PJo spA:lJ 3fqt:1d~p:JJ~P!suo:>
:>J"C 1t:qM '<q5'>pl:CJ1~:nJ!WJ:>1:>posre $O)!]!unwwo;) ;)WOS
"mol! .00 gJIW 00 r 30
SPU!h\ PUlllstp!A'\ II!^" nMOJ ;np llltp ~U:l pal~JS!~ 1l wO.J3
UOpll:>!.Hu~:> 1l JU~Jd Jtre:J!fdd-e :llp llltp ~0Jd 'p.reoq:llp Aq
~OJddll ~q A'IlW lu~uw!nbllJ >pecpas 1~ oor S!lp,{j$Pef
JOUUlO J'elp J~!~q U! J~ oor Imp ~SJ3A\O.L "1U:KUl>J!nbllJ
>p-ecp~ wnw!u!w. S!lp way p;nU1U~ ~. Jl1I4s ;>:>Ull!J'eA
ON .Jq~!;>q ~h\OJ p~odOJd ~tp .JO lU:l:u;lCl 00 r JO wnW!U!W
'e $! J;>h\OJ J~tPOUll30 llJru:mJJS SttpJoddnsJO ~u!f Au~doJd
~U!U!O!pll Aor. OJ ~h\OJ ~lp )0 ~ ;Jtp WOJ) ':>Ull3$!P '"fJ nqJ
os 301 ;l1p UO ~J1l:lOJ ~ Ifllt{S J~q U! ;>JOUI JO~) 001 WMO...
I
/-
~.
.,"
other tower users in the area, stating their siting needs and/or
sharing capabilities in an effort to encourage tower sharing.
ApplicantS cannOt be denied or deny space on a tower unless
mechanical. strUCtural. or regulatory factors prevent them from
sharing. In other words. competing carriers cannot lock each
other out of uerritory. The ordinances for Jefferson Counry.
Oldham County. Mwmomah County. and Palm Beach County
offer derailed examples of sharing provisions and leasing terms.
StrII.CtUriI/ Inttgrity muJ Inspeditm. Most ordinances require
thar any new or modified towers be cerrified by an engineer ac:cord-
ing to strlJ.CtW'a1 standards for antennas offered by either the IDee-
tronic Industries&sociation or the Telecommunication Jndustry
Association. Inspection schedules seem to vary widely according to
the t}'peof tower. as in this provision from Jupiter. Florida:
ln$pectiom-The toWn council may require periodic inspections
of communication rowers to ensure strUCtural integrity. Such
inspecti<m$ may be required as follows: a) monopole toWers-at
least oace every 10 years; b) self-support cowers-at least once
every five yeatJ; c) guyed towers-e.t least once ev~ three years.
Inspections shall be conducted by an engineer licensed by the
StI.tl!of Florida. ~ The resu.lts of such inspections shall be provided
to.the director ofcommunity development. Based upon results of
.aninspection, the town council may require repair or remov:U of
a eommuniaWoa toWer.
, ~ BUilJingt il1IJ Lot Si:r.es. Cellular tOwers are often
accC)mpanied by a small. usually unstaffed StOrage building that
houses tranSmitting equipment. Some ordinances treat them as
accessory u.seso.r suuaures. while others specifically state that
they are not. MOSt ~uire some setback from adjoining
property lin.. the required setback is usuallyproponional to
the area's.density, Oldham County seeks to discourage more
intense use of the sice:
{11- f.aci1icies may Dot include offias.long-rerm vehicle
stOrage. other outdoor sc:oragc. or broadcast srodios, except for
etncrgcncypurposes, or other uses that arc not needed to send
or: receive tfansmissions.
Lot sizes for cellular sites are usually the minimum for the
diStriCt in which they will be built,
M~ _ Pllrking. A few ordinances. include
standards for facility maintenance and parking. The
Mulmomah County ordinance has the most extenSive treatment
ofnWnrenanceimpaas:
Equipment at a~on facility shall be autOmated to the
~ extent possible to reduce traffic and congescic>n. The
applicant shall dCllctibe anticipated maintenance needs.
indl.ldingtteqi.lCttcy of service. personnel needs, equipment
needs. and udlc. node. or safetyimpaas of such maintenanCe.
Where the site abuts qr has access to a collector and local street,
, access for mauuena.nq: vehicles shaU be exclusively by means of
the coIlcaor street.
Parking requiremenb generally do not apply to cellular
tower$. For those comthunities that require parking. the
provision applies to an overall "communication tower facility"
ordinance in which ~ are required only when the
equipment building is $raffed.
Ligbtiag -. ~ Lighting for communication towers is
required when the towclr is tall enough to concern the Federal
Aviation Administrario~ (FM). Jefferson Parish acknowledges
F M rcgularions and th~' privacy of neighboring property owners:
When lig:bring ~ Rq~ and is permitted by the Federal
Aviation Adminisuati9n or other federal or state authority. it
shall be orient:cd inward SO as nor to project onto surrounding
rcsideatial property.
Others. in more ~n areas, may require full review and
certification of the tOw~ application by their local airport
authority. This provisiOn is from Palm Beach County:
Prior to tbc site plan q:ttification, the applicant shaU provide
documentation that th~ proposed communication tower has been
reviewed and is not determined to be a hazard by the FM . . "
(via) the Palm Beach q:ounty Department of Airports. . . , The
PBCpOA shall review the communication tower application to
dcrennine ifir is a ~ to any FM flight. paths.
Some ordinances ~ require fencing or signage. Jupiter
requires a six..foot safety fence with a locked gate. Jf high volrage
is necessary. signs must! be posted every 20 feet. saying.
"Danger-High Volta$e." The operator must also post "No
T respassinJ" signs.!
AINut,J, In Jmt. Most ordinances also restrict the time in
which an unused toWer! may stand to between six and 18
months, with some req,uring the toWer applicant to cover the
demolition costs.
AppliutilJa ~, Perhaps the most telling section
of any ordinance is its application requirements, Although some
commun,itics do not lisf these separately. doing so lets the
applicant know exaaly Iwhat must be provided and indicates
how much the commu~ity knows about the impacts of cellular
phone rower siring. T1u:se requirements should be clearly stated
and not Unpossible to Mfill. Jefferson County offers an
excellent caplanation of what it requires from any tower
applicant, and its, provi$ions demonstrate serious research by the
planning depanment ~ other local agencies. Review of this
ordinance and its aa:oQlpanying "Low Power Mobile Radio
CommuniQarions Land! Use Plan Addendwo" is recommended
for an~ dealing with cellular siring issues,
')
)
M.."', ...~I....
Any cdlularcanier seeijng to 1000te in a community is prepared
to deal with siring connioversies. Some corporations have even
gone so fiu as to pay for! retaining a third-parry consultant to
review anything they hatve: helped draft. These firms target sites
foracquisirion based o~ their tOpographic efficiency. their
accessi&iIity by road. thf availability of electric power and land-
based telephone lines. dfleir leasability. preexisting vegetation and
screening potential, exisPng zoning, comparibility with adjacent
land U$CS, and their abuJty to rranslftitto the largest area.
If local governmentS show that they can meet most of these
needs .....hile prcseMng their community's aesthetic integrity.
health. and safety. they !should be able to avert federal
preeJ;npoon of their l~l rights and responsibilities.
.---""
.....
:Nlft4.
Cellular Facilities: A Survey
of...Cu.,.... Zoning Practices
By Michelk Gregory with /)quglas MlD"tin
L. astJune, Zoning News report~d on gui~elin~~ for siting
cellular tOwers ("LocalPlanrung Issues In SitIng Cellular
Towers"). The article was based ona handful of ordinances and
reP9rtSwe were able to gather from communities that had
experience with the issues surrounding cellular tOwers and
antennas. Sinqt then. the number of applications submitted to
local governments has 111usbroomed to meet consumer demand
for various fotmsof cellular communications technology. To
finduut how they are handling this challenge, APA cooperated
.with the National League of Cities. the U.S. Conference of
... Mayors. the National Association of Counties, and the National
Organization of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors to
survey their member governments con~ing their cellular
facility $itingpolicies. problems. and practices.
........ ,.......SY
Currendy. the most widely used technology is cellular phones
and paging devices. Bur since March 1995. the Federal
Communications Commission '(FCC) has auctioned off 1,900
megahertZ (MHz) of the radio specmun. to new license holders.
The country has been divided intO 5 I major trading areas. with
tWO licenses awarded in each. With 1110re competition and more
money lOr research atld development, the indUStry pioneers
promise even greater communication opportUnities.
FUturistic television commercials depict an "Ameritech test
towa" where customers in a diner try to eat lunch while fiddling
with various personal communication system (peS) devices.
..PCS operates on the notion of "follow-me calling." wherein
. . conununication is routed to an individual rather than a
telephone number via a more sophisticated version of the pager.
The receiving end of the system. however. will likely be a voice
uanstt'lission device. a fax. a Video. screen, or a database instead
of a simple beeper. PCS technology will still be netWorked via
cell sires but willoperattat higher frequencies on the
electromagnetic specmun. (1.850'tO 2.200 MHz versus 800 to
9ooMH~) and will have smaller radii. than current technology.
Industry analysusay the ~tech advertising fantasy is not far
off: They estimacethat more than 15.000 cellular towers have
been built in the U.s. in the last 14 years to meet the service
requirements of more than 25 million customers. They estimate
that by 2003 there will be 167 million PeS users. with at least
100.000 cellular towers needed to accommodate this growth.
.v....... Law
On January 31 "Congress passed the long-debated
Tele.:o~unica;tions Re,tOrmAct of 1996. opening even more
portions of the radio spearum for PCS licenses. Section 704
(Facilities Sitin~ Radio Frequency Emission Standards)
prevents local zoning autboritiesttom arbitrarily banning
cellular towers. The act effectively says local governments
II
cannOt alloW"o~e ~rriet aJci exclude another. bur it also
acknowledges their righ~ toCletermine the criteria for siting
cellular facilities. However, it aIso bars state and local
gove!"!!~~armg 'Such facilities "on the basis of the
environmeiltal effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent
that such facilities comply" with FCC regulations.
The cellular indusrryt lobbied hard for federal preemption of
local siting powers. Its argument for federal preemption focused
on efficiency: Given the imminent proliferation of cellular
phones. pagers. and oth~r emerging PCS technology. all driven
by an unrelenting consumer demand. the nation would be
better served by nation\lJ standardization of f;lcility siting
requirements. Advocate$ claimed such standardization would
drastically reduce the ~ount of rime necessary to establish cells
throughout the countryl
Cellular industry
lobbyists Will now ;hift
their deregulation
campaign to State
legislatures. In Vermont,
proposed legislation
would require local
governments to make
reasonable provision for
cellular carrier transmis-
sion facilities or treat
them as a conditional use
in any district. in effect
forcing communities that
have not yet dealt with
the issue to develop the
appropriate provisions.
Although PCS
technology and the laws
regulating it are obviously
moving targets, APA has
tried to gather information on current practices for siting
facilities and on future plans by the indusoy for making them
less visually obtrusive and difficult to accommodate. This issue
of Zoning News is inten~ as a timely update and companion
docU11lent to the June I ~95 article. which remains a good
primer on the basics of ~ular communications technology and
the issues planners face. I
~~::
;-~~~!~f'
.,"'-;it1.;(
'ii">..
TelecommuniccdiOns
Reform Act of 116
. .. Section, 704 .:;. .
. ", ,,' if
effectively says i~
local govemme"is
cannot allow oni
f1
carrier and exch.fl:le
another, but it af.o
1!.r.!
acknowledges t$:tir
i bt to detenni&
~."',.
9
Ivolvlns PMctIc.
Often. it seems. the cellular industry's own consumers have been
among those who object to the visual pollution and perceived
electromagnetic pollutioq: that accompanies cellular transmission
facilities. This irony po~ a complex problem for planning and
zoning professionals. S~fu1 cellular communication can
occur only where there is Ian adequate netWork of communication
cells webbed together by ~e4"nuclei. the transmission antennas.
Industry representatives ~y the cells cannot be installed fitst
enough and that local governments' site plan review and approval
procedures are log-jammihg the telecommunications revolution.
They also suggest that. as Ithe nation continues to shifr from
ExhibitC
"
f_S, Doesyoufconununity ~ or require tower sharing to
~the ~_it is ~yfeasible? _ Yes _ No
TtttwlResponses: 199. 154 (77%) replied that they require or
"~etower.$haring to cl1e extent that it is technically
feasiWe. 4j (23%) replied they did not.
9. WcauWyou~n or oppose federal preemption oflocal
~tower ~staDdards? _ Support ___ Oppose.
TfJtitl ~: 212. 1,3 (6%) said they would suPPOrt
federal preempQon,.~ 199 (94%) said cl1ey would oppose it.
10. What were tht. ~ns. for denial of cellular toWer
applica,tions.?
TfJtitl~: 19. Every respondent listed strong
oppQ$iti~from adjal:ent residenn.l or business property
t>wnet$ as the reas<)n Jor denial.
11. HcawWOtdd,1OU describe the feasibility of cellular tower
sitinf,wirhiU ~ ~ty?
T_~ 153. Because the responses were anecdotal,
weJad .~. anchssigned each one a feasibility rating.
Not very r..lble: 36 (24%) quaUned as having "not very
feasible" towersiti03 environments. Among the circum~
. ~ we~to be recurrent in this category were:
.... . ........ . intense public opposition to visual pollution'
.~tense ptAblic\t>pposition to health risks assOciated
withcel1ulatteclmoiagy
. .presence of an environmentally sensitive area or scenic
Overlayd.istncr
. rechnitaltYOOt approvable due to outdated regulations
. DO land available ror towers, can locate antennas only
on existing buildings
. multiple ~ and approvals required by different
. .' bodies
~
. <permitted in industrial di$trias only
.. request for tower too close to an airpOrt environment
FaWble: 58 <38%) qualified as having feasible tower
sitingen~tS. Recwrent commentS:
. ... towers allowed in S0111e but not all distriCts
. .!0.. regulations. were still in the process ofbeing updated to
a<<ommodate ceIlulat technology
. ~pt.lblicaccepW1ce
. &vorablt enviroo.ment if zoning for location is met
. .iamrablt envitonment.but prefer rooftop installation
mdc:ooJocationon existing towers <
.' fmttablt environme1'U: if tower is designed to "blend"
wicl1 its swroi1ndings
. ~ meet landscape requir~rs for the site
· '- 6worable environment everywhere except residential ateas
Veiy FeuibJe:S9 (39%) qualified as having vet]' feasible
~environments; ~t commentS:
. recently a.mended.tegulations to ~mmodate celluiar
~ology
. easy. lone as sinHs aesthetically compatible
. tpodreJarionshipwith cellular carrier
. littll!'or no public opposition has been expressed
· proposal and si~eplan in line with local standardsl
land..use contrOls
. p.rpposing part':'respectSlocal concerns
12. What (if any) are Jour community's cellular tower
requirements for t.he~llowing:
Height (total respot,ses: 112). Most commonly, height
limitations were a 61nction of cl1e district cl1e tower was to
be located in or the nensity .of existing development. For
building-mounted ~tennas, the height added to a host
building was.aJso li~ited in. this way. In many
commUl1ities, muUhum height was a function .of cl1e
setback possible on tihe lat. regardless .of the district or the
density. These tOiWeJf-speciDc height standards were tied t.o
the.setback to protet1t adjacent property or property
owners from damagI:f that could be caused by a fallen
tower. Height restriqtians.in communities that reported
these in feet ranged tom 30 to 320 feet. In some
communities where ~0111munitywide height restrictions
were intended ta ~ntain a small or quaint scale of
building devdopm~t, towers had been exempted. In
other cases, cl1ey we~ allowed to exceed standard height
limits only with a vaJ!iance .or special use permit. Finally.
same communities' tl>wer heightS were contingent upon
Federal Aviation ~nistration (F M) approval, because
towers. would be loca.l:ed near airports or flight paths.
Setback (total".,qes: 131). The most common
formula for setback was a percentage of the tower height.
The most conservativ~ setback reported was 100 percent
of tower height plus ain arbitrary additional distance (such
as 10.or 20.feet for ~)fro111 the nearest pr.operty
line or street. The int~t was to protect adjacent property
from damasein cl1e etent of a fallen tower, but it shauld
be noted that some to~ are designed ta collapse within
themselves rather than topple forward. In most cases. the
setback was based. on ~e district's requirements. One
respondent had no setback requirements because towers
were allowed .only on fUb1ic property such as municipal
golf c.ourses or utility easements. Anocl1er had no setback
requirement roc the individual lot, but did require spacing
of 300 feet from the n~ residential dwelling.
Landscaping and ~ (tottd ~.95). The
most common respo~ was a requirement roc
landscaping.arou.nd cl1~ base .of cl1e structure, with a
height and depth ~ for vegetation. Another
COmmon response was Ithat landscaping be required for
cl1e area fronting residqmw .or commercial property or
streets. Somep1aces ~uired landscaping. only for towers
locating in residential qistrias. Others required
landscaping standards ~o be determined by aZBA or a
design review board. A I few required the landscaping of a
percentage of the total fot area. For those that had
communitywide lan~ ordinances orguiddines in
place, very specific ~ (such as shrub type and planting
methodology) were ~ A few communities applied tree
planting requirements ~ch as "one six-foot tree for every
40 feet of fron.... or ..~ treeS required."
As roc nonvcgetative ~ng, most places again
required some form of Screening around the base of
towers., in addition to p~ting. Specific descriptions
included: brick ~ walls. chain link fences, solid
wood fences. opaque barriers, and berm. Some
communities reported ~ing or screening height
requirementS. These ~from four to ~4 feet.
A more flexible but '1gue approach, reported
frequendy. was to requi~ that landscaping be done in a
SU!ltu'eW~ .s;)A1:h\ bu~nb~.IJo!p~
:>~uiew~p~tp ~~ ' <ltp)0 ptr.)R/I\OI
~tp D Jl'l1~ om lp!~ 'gp~ ~.OWCJ J1 $<)l~:xIO
&IO~l.mrnfFO 'gp~n~ 0 wn.n~S :>~u.t
~O~p <>tp JO swm ul 'SUO!leu ill 1!4\S ~ sStn.PJ!tlq
~015 u! ~oqlu:;)Wd!n~~. pm 'g:)!MP,UOP'E::>
-!unww<>:) JqtlJP:' ppq-pueq 'mJlT,Jl .n;nfl>>:J! am pue
;)l~"U~ letp S:OJnos UOP1l:)!lffi <>:) ~!J4 ~tp ;).re
;)J"q~ ,~ ~~p JO t IAOf 1fl!/o\ ~poSS1:
~.re s:o~ pm ~ffi:>13 SUOp1O!U1l <Xl..mrn1P' 'fIlJ<l~
UJ: '~ QJOO U! S! uopmqdo}o V '(fz' ,~.l
~) sp.npaaS UO!ft!1U3: (:DG) !:I ~a
" -P"AOW;U;;KJ , ,t).M.Ol "tp '.f!8cbJ
OJ UOPu;llU! OU S'JAoqs J"UA\O "tp P "t~OU! S! R/I\OJ
;)tp 11 '[PU11O:) Alp pm: UO!SS!Wwo:) ,. en pm tu!tnreyd
;)tp Aq }llAOJdch pm: h\;)!^"lJ pd JnOtp!J4 p>>eyd;)J
~ lOUue:l l! 'Uh\op UA\Otq JO ' ~'~
'p;)A0W3J ~ 01 S! .Q4\01 <ltp 11.. ods;u .S!lP.]>>RJJO
Al!lffiWWO:> ;)U() *1>>1J!lUtJ!8W ~ ~1s.<s J;)PfUpds
pue SU!mospuq ;)l!S;)tp l~ P 'taOU$}o.re:>p 1d"Jf
~ "1!S ;)tp 01 proI ~ "tp l1:tp: ~Ul;).f!tllm J;)PlJ!llb
"tp iuowy *SDUA\O ;;Iq1 tp!/o\ 51 ~lurew
~ Oll!! J>>mU;) p-et{ htp]>>u pO;)m ap!lffiurwro .
~mos '.re;)A;)UO 01 s.{~ 06 OJJ ~ fllAOW;U
JOj po!J"'d ;o-eA ;)l{.l 'am JO UO, .10 ';o~osqo
'1~ueq-e J?tp uodn gp! , "eJ ]>>11=pJ pm: RM01
;;Itp ~ OJ ]>>luuoare 510;) ,nlm ;otDU;)lU!l:W
;;Itp JO lSOW '(If, l"JDI) ~1J!8W
-p.reoq h\;)!^"U mi!gp 1: Aq i.Jddt: J"euop!puo:>
P;U!flb:u "00 pm: 'lue:lndd1: "tp J UO!~"tp 01 dn
suo!l~!suoo ..u!ID:>3 1];)1 h\;)J V 'J! :xl am proop!puo:>
1: tp!/o\ J! ~orre J;)q10m: ;)UqM" !A\ J>>qJ1lqJo am ;;Itp
p;)l!q!1fOJd .<ps;ud:lQ Al!lffiwwro ;)UO "J!A\ ~q JO "fu!l
-U!~ 'Jppq S1l tpns J"e!R1lmI JO 1 !"l{ SupmlJ p:l9P;;Ids
sJ;)tpO;)f!1{A\ 1JuptI;)j "JooJd-qw!p.. ;)gp:xIs S:01:Id,;nuoS
'l~W3J!nb;u SuptJdJ JO ;xLU ;)WOS ~P $;I$UodgJ IJ"e
lSoWfV 'lff :sml.tH/$a.J. J1'1ot) 51O;)1U;),J, b:Il{..u~ nlJ10
(" S66 I 01:>0 ,,':xIlOSptre'J
m:<pn "tp uo 1qSn SU!PP;)l{S" 3 's:otreU!pJO tpns
uo Uop-ewJO;Ju! ;)JOW JO:l) .. ';):> !pJO .urs >y.rep" s..UP
;)tp JO spreptmS "tp l~W Sup~t 1 S1lA\ lu;ltu;)J!llb;)l
j1:11snun l5OW,,1J.l '51~y Su!lJS"eB OU ;)gp:xIs ..u!unurwO:>
;)UO ~J or JO S I S1l tpns 'lq3!;)l{, 1: ;)Aoq-e pd.l-eld
;)q lOU PflKX> ~q3n1-etp p"gp:x!s :J-etd ;)WOS'l:>p1Srp
AllP;)AO :>!~:>S -e JO asn1l:)~ lO A~ ;)l.f1 Supnp FPI;)!qs
;)(} Supqfu.y mp P;U!n~J SRlJ10 'J. "tp SU!J11P Supq3!l
;)(}OJ15 ;;Il!l{A\ pm: Jl{S!u 11: 51q2n pa JO am ;)tp 1>>g~ds
~ V" "..{PJO SupqS!l..up~:y!S1: "se uo~old l!;)tp
P;)(}~P S1~uodgl ;)WOS 'Au:x!OJ J"e!10;)J'!S:>> Ayqt:30U
150W 'b,gdold l~:re!pll UO "Ief2 U! 1 JOU iupq2n ..tUll
1mp S1lA\ J~tu;)J!llb;)l uowwro J"lJ1 <ll{.l '51~w;;lJ!nb;)l
:X):I lO W:I l~W OJ SU!J in JOJ~U ;;IlJ1 S1:M
3UOOs;u UOWWOO 150W ;;I1J.l '(6; : J1'IOI) iupq2n
'51!W!l Jt(S!;;Iq:> . ;;IlJ1 ~:>x;;l 10U pm:
gpl:xl()Jd ~ s,~urpl!nq ;;IlJ1lJ1! U! PU;>Iq S;;IJnJ:)tlllS
;)lJ11lllJ1 P;U!fl~l hq.l "St:UU;;I1tre 01]ooJ 01 S;;IJnJ:)nllS
..uOSS:O:>ll JO;J suo~OJd 1>>lS!Y SlU;;IPU gJ OA\ ~ 'Jf:Jpq p:u
WO.IJ p;l1:>tllJSUOO "'<I 01 ~A-eq OS{E PJTlO Al!J!:l-J lU3U1d!nb;;l
~lf1 '~pq p:u JO ;;Ip~W SU!pI!nq ;;1;)91 m:. OJ am koss;):>:>~
Ull ;U;;l"l\. iurpnnq JO xoq 1u;lWd!n ~ p;;ll-epoSSt:SJ! pm:
l~MOl ~ J! 'splOM l<llJ10 UJ '~sn y-edp pd;;llJl s-e SJ"eP~lt:W
JO mi!gp ~urpnnq ;)um <>tp ~ cnP;U!fl~J ;U;)IA
sSU!Pt!flCl p:llt:fll ;;Itp ';)SIt .y-edPUpd,llOl ~.~
m: S!J?Sl! J;)IA01;;1lJ1 ;)J;)l{A\ SUO!3WO!S JO:l'~JO
1Ju!d1l:)spuef '.I;)jJnq UM.O 51! ~.~ <ltp lmp ~
pm: RJJUq ;)l.f1 U!lJ1!/o\~1l:)()t ~ .bqJ mp p;lJ!U1m awOS
JIm! J;;I/I\03;;1lJ1 pue wn Au:x!o.td atp..q:toq ~ ~
;)Jn1:>TUl$ k~ ~1~ ~ ~ <nUOS *f8^OJdd-e
p.reoq ~!^"U ~ p;lJ!U1w u:npo 'mi!CJ' amoq
J"e!lO;)P!S'>> ::l!S1l'J s,pootpoqqi?u>.,tp."'N~ cn1>>~
~ S1:l!JlSrp J"e!lu:orp~ U! SJ:M\OlJ~ ~ b~
1mp p:>J!fl~J "mos ':>pro iuwnnq alp J;);)J.u s::tm:t>n.us
.uoss:o:re 1mp.AJut> P;u!flb;u ~.~ h!uoz
;;IlJ1l0J 51u;lW;)J!f'b;u ;;IJ1UlU.1U'~ Oll.f1.pagdie
gp!t"'urwro AuaW' ':>:>p:reJd !~dou '$'&\\ antp
pm: 'APP!M A.m.\ 01 ~ 51U3utWO:) ~ *1mlWd!fl~
~U1lUaJUrew JO Sup1!WSUm asnoq Ol.~.~URX.
om glUJ:)tllJS ~ 'UO~'!1P.Ol ~
16 :>J;)IA ;)J;)U.'(I6 .~ pt1.Dl) ~ ~
'~$ :uo::>
'(OOf~.~6~.619) ~l'r1~JOU~
oi;)!O tnls '.Uillcl.mmJ ~t1~",trt'J~
'9z:Kfm '96""6111 #~'~.IOJtf$TlfCl
'Z'I$ :no:) '(yffL~6~,",0l) A!1!DJO~ ~N
WOl] ~1!A"I '9661.'01 'lflJ'IJfi ~ <:nN)
A!l!:)jO;)~ puop1lN 111 u~JO. '..&UP.D1OA.
OJ SlJ'DN 11 11lt.f&--9661 JO JJ:Jy~.L.
'(Z9zr68t..to~) ..,!W~
'01~WU)lls <p1oH b~ JtIIAH '9661 'yl.4-eW
'dolfSJfJl>&, ms: suopYO!UftllJWlX)3p~ uliPq~~
lU;>WW<MO!) ptnl Uop1lpOUV~.Lnmo::>IA1!:)
PUOPllUD1UI itAoU)l 01 pa3N ~d ~
J1OO111lt.f& ::l:lV SUO!1~~.L :qp i~
'l.'OI*'96#~
'Rp.10 UUOW JO :patp ~ t$1Rfd8$.:1IO:)
t~dV.L-696-o1") 80nZ ON ~'aAp(IFl
J;)"oO)f ~Z8 '~r.~ p;rpJO:lOllm.<Uf~V
'9661 'f lpJ1'N '~(D ;>~.(Q:)VN)
A!lunO:) jO uopepossy JBUO!111N 111 ~ joadll;\
" 'ms: suopJl:l!UllwwCD3p.L ,lA;>N ;>q1 JO UCl!SlQ~..
'Z661 '~~!Un ~atmI:lfO
's?l3!:J 3p3Jr1Jf f'U1I ~ l.1w~ tRtrJ jIJ R>>J!:1 'fI11hH
~ou
JOj O~$ ~;)SmpJo Q;>l] S.I:Xf~ ~ hOJ!'4PV ,
ilU!UU1lJd 01 ;)lqVf!U" S! 't>>~ ,PU1l ;utI)lWI1!f
JO UO!1tq!dwo::lll 'P'I3tfcl ~ ~ .nIfI'1P.)S,VdV
s.aauuDld .10' saunosall ..aq."
'S!lJ1 p;;luod;)J ApoqOU mq 'S:l'Z!S 101 ~ ;;I1JlJ~ ~
~ ~ ;)A-eq 0Sf1': AlmI ;Olnos :lJAa tre01 S;mlltmefpe
}O Al!tu!XOJd ~ l;)AO U.Q:>UO;l lmp :l1~ ;:)4\ -po~
S'!1Jl2U!sn.10J UO!l'E::>gpsn( .(.rewpd :>1Jl S!l());)"ej hnddOl
-l;)MOl ;;I'tfl 'U~ 'lq2?q J;)h\Ol}OUop::nmJ ~1! ~
OJ S1lAc\ ;)Z!S 101 SU!U!WJmp JO) potp:nr.tUOWWOOJ:ltpo
;)tf~ 'gJ:)1: 0 I st:.M dJ-ey ;;Itp pm: '3~J ~.mnbs OOO'~ s1lM.
p;;Iuod;;ll ;)Z!S 101 1S;)yJ't:W$:ltf.l '~J;)~ JO .00] :l.nmbs
J;;Iql!;;I U! p:luod;u ;>>;;1/1\ htfl 'Sl~umu ~:P'UJ: 'U! IT!flq
;;Iq PJTlO/l\ J;)/I\Ol ;)tp r>pJSrp ju!UenJ;)A31.JO;J p;lA\OlJ"e
:n!S lOT wnw!u!w ;)lJ1 Aq P;)U!~P ;u;)IA 51tJ~!nb::JJ
;)Z!S 101 lS0W "(69 :sa1tltH/su~) nua~~ 10'}
':xIll:)SptreYlP 'SSu!pT!nq'J;:):I:>lUt:tp
~U!pUnOlJnS :ltp tp!A\ ;)Iqplldwro Ol<:J.PJUOA\ It!tp AtM,
#
~
,..;"
thn:>ugh space. there is a byproduct known as radio
frequen~' radiation. Electromagnetic radiation is broken
into two groups: ionizing and non-ionizing radiation,
Radio frequency radiation is non.ionizing, which means it
does not possess enough energy to create ions. Ionizing
radiation. on the other hand, is capable of altering the
chemical srruaure of organic matter. Cellular communi-
cations devices and facilities generate non.ionizing
radiation. However, there is evidence of a very rare
phenomenon that occurs when complex organic mol-
ecules with short linear groups of atoms extending off the
main molecular body encountersrrong, non..ionizing
energy at very high power densities. This rare encounter
can cause a frequency resonance to occur. The vibration
cawed in- thisresonance can result in molecular alter-
ation. H~ this specifically translates into a human health
hazard is the subject of much debate among EMF
researchers. Until fUr-.her clarity can be provided, the
scienti6c community advocates that proximity to higher
notl..ionizing radiation sources be controlled where
possible. This approach is known as prudent 4tlfJidance.
EMFs and the health concerns associated with them
r~ the mO$telusive aspects of cellular facility siting.
The federal government has adopted no formal standards
fo,fwhat is or is not safe.
Both private and public organizations and government
~ies have proposed guidelines that limit expomre to
nonionizing radiation. These standards can be divided into
broad categories: tmisitm stantiards, which ser the limits on
the incidental {nonpurposeful) ,.diation emanating from a
device: and ~ sta1Uittrds, which set limits on the
radiation power. ~nsity to which a person may be exposed.
Emission standards limit unwanted leakage from devices such
as microwave ovens that should contain the radiation inside
the derice or that have shielding to protect operators and
others from exposure during normal operation. Exposure
SWldards limit exposllre of persons to radiation present in
the environment, fur example from a radio transminer.
From ~1ichae1 G. Yost, Ntmwnizing RAdiatitm Qwstitms
Ilnd A,UWUS (S.&n Francisco Press, Inc., 1988).
.. In the meantime, communities nationwide continue to rely
on standards set by the American National Standards Institute,
as reported in"JEEE Srandardfor Safety Levels with Respect to
Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic .Fields. 3
kHz to 300 GHz" (c.95. I -1992). MO$t responses to this
quemon referred. to these Standards, This document is a revision
of ANSI's. 1982 srandardsin which they State that "devices
.rating on less than seven watts of power at frequencies less
than 1,000 MHz will .not cause immediate thermal effects."
Cellular mobile phones operate between 0.6 and three watts of
poVlel' at ftequenciesbetween 800 and 900 MHz. PCS mobile
communicators are anticipaJed to operate on no more than one
Watt of pov.-er .at frequencies between 1.850 and 2.200 MHz.
&th &11 well bdow the seven-watt threshold.
Cellular sires. including monopoles, roof-mounJed antenna
sites, at.Id building-mounted antenna sites. emit a maximum of
3,000 watts of effective radiated power or ERP (the power
supplied to an antenna multiplied by the relative gain of the
antenna in a givendireccion). In comparison, radio broadcasting
towers emit roughly 100.000 watts ERP, and television
b~dcucing towerumit approximately Eivemillionwatts ERP.
The radiation emitted from these broadcasting sources decreases
according to the inverse square principle, which states that the
.....
.
further the distance fro the source, the less potent the
radiation. Transmission uality also operates on this principle.
For more information on cellular communications
technology and the subje t of electromagnetic fields and
communication towers, e highly recommend Wireless
Communications Faci/hi Issues Paper (San Diego Association of
Governments, 1995).
Whar were some other c nditions for approval?
This section represents assortment of unique conditions for
approval that we did not nticipate in our survey design,
Common among them w the exclusive acceptance of
monopole towers or tran itting antennas that wou,ld be
mounted on pre-existing uildingsor structures such as water
towers. Still other comm nities listed the exclusive acceptance
of guy-wired lattice tower, As mentioned earlier, some
communities required F approval when towers were to be
located near airports or fli ht paths, in which case strobed
lighting was required. On community specifically prohibited
any signage or advertising on the site, Some communities also
required the use. of a speci c color of paint on the tower, such as
light gray or lighr blue, A .ety of special conditions were
applied to towers locating in residential areas. A public norice
and hearing were often re uired. One communit)" allowed
towers in residential distri s only if they were somehow
~ouised as part of an . ting building. Another required proof
that the owner had adeq te insurance coverage for any
potential damage caused b or to the tower. Yet another
required that the applican show a local demand for the
technology to justifY its n cessity. The mOSt unusual
requirement was for an est mate of the number of vehicle trips
per day for the proposed s' te. This may have been the by-
produCt of a broader trans ortation impaCt analysis requiremenc
for all uses proposed withi a given commercial diStrict.
What types of approval p duces were used?
This was not a question 0 the survey, but the responses
revealed that most commu ities allowed towers with a
conditional use permit, second most common approval was
via special use permit, Fi y, a much smaller group of
communities stated that t ers were allowed by right in some
districts but not in others ( oS( notably, residential). For those
communities that required approvaIS by more than their
planning commission or zo . ng board of appeals, the most
frequently mentioned enti es were design review boards,
historic preservation board , the F M, and the FCC. Though
not reported by these respo ents, we subsequently have heard
of community deferral to e decision of a state-level utilities
commission or board. Co munities should verify whether this
form of approval exists in eir State.
Third PanyWIreless Go-
Many third-party entities ve stepped in to help facilitate the
cellular revolution, Muoici a1 planners and officials often need
technical education, legal vice, and negotiating tips while
cellular carriers often need. elp scouting and acquiring sites for
their transmission devices, me communities, in conjuncrion
with the carriers who have proached them, have hired
coruultants to fulfill these.n ds. Some of these firms are
subsidiaries of the teleco unications companies, and others
are independent organizacio that more or less serve the
cellularcommunicacions in usrry. FoxFire Communiry
.. Planning&: Development i Denver and Unisite in Dallas are
two suchorganit.ations. Th bring. a wealth of cellular
technology experience .and I nd-use expertise to the table,
.,
~
'IflA\0J2 ~t:pourwOX11101 SAl:M. punos
Alf&1U;)WUOJ!AUd pUll AIfIl'S9 ;)JOW iJug>ug 1f!s:l!l!tIDUIUIOj
pre 01 S! ~ooq ;)tp JO wre ;)lfJ. 'A1~OpJllAJllH JO
U;)PAl:)I 's PIOJ;)[ JOSS;)JOJcI pUll ~n?l:lllre!WA\. JOl1mS!U!lDPV
V cI3 J<lWJOJ ltre;)(] pr&\\OH '409 lU()UJ'J;) A J~WJoJ
:W<ltp iJuoury 'sw<lyqoJd ;mtp JO Sl:)~ SStOS!P otfM lUdUrnAOW
UO!lEAJ:lSUOj pUET <ltp U! s:unig lUd1f!U1O.ldJO ~u II WOJJ
suo!lnqpluoo j);)pnpu! :lAtrq SJo1prrt Amup"d;nu "1u:nudopA:lp
M;)U JO} PUllJ JO uO!ldwnsuoo <ltp u! tp.aa0Ji iJu!tIIJ1l{ll
:ltp U~ 01 sAl:M. :lA!l:><ljp .pug 01 m ~ :mq 'SUO!l~
JO lSoq II ~OJ1p Al!fmb {lllUdWUOJ!AtJ;) Sl! :lAOJdUl! 01. ~P
~ lSllJ :ltp U! Sd<J1S JOftnU Ud"f'll ~ smlS p;31!uO <llfJ.
'$6YZ$ '9661 "ii
89f "6000Z ::;a 'uoiJu!f(S11tn 'OOf 3Spt.S.'AN "~y~auuO:J
8lL I 'rra.Jc/ J1UtlJsJ 'u1IUooN ':I 2f3'fJ1.1Ic/ fJU1I"fJ1H.~(] 7 tJTnH
D......." III -n PUD,
"S:l!l!utUIOddo iu!sooq <<lfqtlpJOJJIl
JO <lreqs J"!IlJ J!:ltp ~u!p!AOJd 10U :m 'iJu!UUtlld {llUO!Ji:lJ
~UOJ1S ql!1lII. <<lSOtp U<<lA<<l 'S<l!lP Jno JO S1l<<lJ'e u-eqmqns JiU!1lII.0m
:ltp l-etp ;):>U:lP!A<<l ;)yq"Eg!lu"Enb J<<lH0 SlynS<lJ <<lq~ 'SUO!lj"E
pUll s;)p!Iod IlljOl pUll 'lU:lUJUOJ!AU:l .AJ01Y:f11~J POOl '~lS
Jiu!snoq lU;)JJn:> J!:lql 111 P:l'3fOOI pUll S:l!l!untUWO:> Ullqmqns
~U!1lII.0JJi 0 I P;)l:)<lI<lS SJOqlnll <lU"Sp:l:lU <lS:l1p ~U!SS:lJppll
Sll1lll. UO!~<lJ ;np II:l1lll. 1lII.0q lsnf UrelJ;)jSll OllqinOS ApnlS S!q~
'~u!snoq <lIq-ePJo]Jll ~U!l~OWWO:>:>-e JOJ${lloj qS!yqtl1S:l 01
S;)!l!UnWWOj ~u!J!nb<lJ S:lp!niJ 1U<lwdopA;)p {llJ;)A:l$ p:lqsnqnd
Sllq 1! 'S:lpllj:lp OAU lSlld :ltp J:lA{) "UO!11lfndod :lWOjU!
-:llllJ:lPOW pUll -1lII.01 S, UO!~<lJ :ll.fl JOJ jU!sooq :lIq-epJO]Jll
~U!P!AOJd 01 qj-eOJddll<lJllqS .f!llJ -e P;)l-e:>oApll ~UOI Sllq
S:lp!:) U!1lII.~ S;e10S:lUU!W U! [!:>uno::> UeJ!JodOJ1<l'N:lq.L
"a3"t.:J '''08 Ot66l '$$tff NW 'n.1tH/113UU!W "S 3nTnllV
q161 [Of '.l31Tn::; ,(a.tqiulnH 11 W'lnH Off 'S.t!11J!y 11lUo~~
puv uvq.tfl ,,10] mua::; 'au1l)J (J 13vq~W fJU1I Ull1'l1N.l32f117 v.tvq.tVfl
c,....r .p ... GpD. .p
IS.!UO% .u....Sft'.XI
:....,....... esn p..,
sJJOQatJ9NIHOZ
3ino~ uy.tvw 's:mb!ut.p;)l UOpllA.1:lSUOj;)Aptl;)Jj
;l$TI 01 SJ:lwnSUOj uOlaldeJS ;}jJOJ OllJOjp U1l U! ~ J:lll:M.
Jnoq-~d 10J SaSll:lJjU! <llllJ ~U!J;)P!SUO;) OS{ll S! :nIS -SUO!lllAOUU!
{ll:>!SOIOUtp:ll JO ,uapllA 11 OllSl1!pll U101lltp--s:>relloAOloqd
Sll q:ms S;}jJnOS A15J;)U;) ;lA!lllU1:ll{ll ptre '~lp {ll.I1UllU
'sa!lmqlld1l:l jpdo l<lqgS1J!pnpU!~mljnnse.yU! :lICJpr.1IJ
II Y{lllsu! 01 SlUl:M.:nIS 'Al!I!qll!A;mu1l} S,UOJ;){dmS:Un5U;l 0.1
';)UO.AJ;)A;) 10J ;ljtrelS!P ~!'l{llA\ U!l{l!1l11. S! UopElJodSUllll
j!Iqnd pUll '(a1!S :lq1JO p1!l{l II l;lAO) ~X1lW S! ;):>llds
U:ldo tp!l{A\ U! ,u!unurwOj 11 SUO!S!Alld <:lH 'SlUdP!S;)J OOO'OfPUll
sqof OOO'OZ ql!1lII. :ll<lydwo:> Al!unWWO;) ;JSn"'j);)X!W ';){q!SUOdS:l1
AY{lllU:lWU01!AUa Ull OlU! :ll!S <:If!w-;umbs-UdA;lS ;lIp l1;)AUO:>
01 sueyd uoa~n09 WO~ 03:::> 'sreaA M;)] lX:lU;)tp 1;)A{) ',illad01d
;ltp SU!II:lS pUll ~U!P!A!pqns lsnf Ulltp sUllJd J~f tpnw tp!1lll.
uOlaldlllS ]0 lU;lwdopAapa1 ;lql s:lnU!lUO;) .:nIS '~q1lll.Ull;)'N
':ll;ll{A\;lSI;l :>fOOf 01 p:lpp<lpSllq :)gdH O:lUOZ ffl!lU;)P~l ;lq1 01
Al!W!XOJd S.I;)j1lld aqJ]O ;lSl111j;}q md U!'1!WJdd aSl1{llUO!l!PUOj
:lql aU!AU;lp Aq ,\5JaA011UO:> atp j);)PU;l pJllOCj i5U!UUllld ;ltLL 'llne]
...
@
~_,_uod %01 I've
':>l\!:l pllpkl:u %O.LiJ~iu!JmPU!'~ ~ l\IO P:nu!'d
'UO.!1llpOSSVill!Uueld Utl:t!nwy alpwOJJ
iu!,!,,,,, U! UO!$S!WJ:>d ,nolp!"" '~s.{s J1'A:>!JJaI ~ .'OU ~GJV! Aue Act .to
'llu!pJO~" 'liU!Ado~o'oqd litqpnpvl '!1l:il!u~ '0 "'_~ __lit AW 4q 'OlWOj
,(ue U! ~l!'n '0 p'~npo'.>>' "'I AcW .UO!'B"!lqlld.'!'P JO JJIlIiON op;wual nl!i!Z IfV
'%OO,::xJ 'uOliv!ljR&' "&.'N ":>AV S1~W9u.I.n$llO!1Jo
.m.nmbp1!:>q self u0!'1I!3OS$V lIU!u....ldUll:l!Dwy lnf~ "090911 'oiB"!~::)'OO9f'
",!ns ""^V treli!'P!WOS ,t1'uo~nvlllJ!UWId UlI:l!DWVM! ~61Cll'~
'UO!mtpo.td put.~
'UOJJeg.1lS!1l'O'!!"3 'lI1l3S!lISV '!limo 'lJtfJuA::) l~ 'ltotdw01t~ 'IJ.ll11!1 cMtI'q
.weW'SJuowe.uew 'u!J,ew iltOQ '.~ ttdaW '-f .ie!lft$'~ "IP'P!W
~OAO Uo:lS "'I"!IIIOO ,{1Y: lJO'!!':I 'qm.1f"S W!f 'YlV n pmtpo.td SJ -NJa!""Z
'q~ j(> 'o""'~ 'U!"DI ")I we!ll!4\ l_:lW!(IlMpn>>ll1 iup:>v 'os 'S' ~:I
'(ui!aJoJJ ~9S pIR (OS'O)O)S 'OJ ~erJW' nil UI~S 'UO~
lIv!uuerd '""!JHtV alp AI! pll'lSll'lnd ~ Al'f1'K"l/ 1I'1! -Ii '-!1t1lZ
1E 10U SE1lII. ::n:rS 1Etp p:>Z!{tl;)J btp ~ ~ S~ ,SJoqttS!:m
:lq.1 . ~~ {ll$QdOJd :l1plnoqll Pre;ll.f 10U ptll.f btp AqA\lnoqu
m'l .AJ:M\C)J'I()Jj!W ;)tp1noq-el0U p::nU<l:>1lO:> ~ snJpo lSOW
'SJl1l:l ;)tp Aq p.reniJ ]JO 1qSn1l:l pUll fllWdOJd alpJo ::ll1lA\l!Ut'I .~
S{llP9JO :nIS '.A.1!';;l1p pUll ':nIS '1~ ~$I;)l atp ~ uop
-1l:l!unUIUlOj JO "PliTt: 01 :ma 'llod.J!e <lqJ JOJ s:JSn::l:re!1do.td~
SU!pma1 snsU:lSUO:> PUnq 01 SlUdP!S::U tp!1lll.spsoqOJd 1Uaw
-dopA;)p lIE ~U!ssn:>s!p JOJ :lIq!suods:uS! :nlS',U!Ut'1UU,fOO:llp
ql!1lII. p:ltptl;)J lU<lUJ;)::lli'll tre]O mdSV'S'(f!:> i>UOt{&?1Ip!h\-dlfS
j);)l~untf! APlll!p;)WW! 'pOOtpO'l~U mH."fJ'l'dj:.l1'8::lJ~ ~U
;)tp JO SlU;)P!S:lJ 'S:l!lJlldtpoq JO :>spdms ;)tp 0 ~ 'SUO!lU<l)ll!
S,WJg ~ql]O j!Iqnd ~tp SU!4J!lou~p:>1SOd k!ri3l.f1pUll
'l!WJ~d :lSl1 {llUO!l!PUO:> 'I: J<>.:1 p;)!Jddll App!fib :>idH '~lq
, :ltp S:lpnpX::l tp!q1lll. ~n {llpJ;)UJUl()j JO} P:lUOZ S! ~ :retp
"{I;;llllUn110JU [l OU01;)Id1l1S JO <lp!S 1S:l.AU.pnos ~ql UO d:>1ldS 11 ::lStl;)f
01 P;)lUll1lll. htp 11lqll!S!A ;)UO 1:l1J1l p:>P!"::lP SJ;)U1lII.0 S,::>gcIH
'lJod.t!ll U01;)fd~S JO lU:lwdop~p;)J atp
;):;lSl;)AO 01 p;)qsnqlllS;;l UO!lllZ!treSJO 19OJduou II ~.:nIS '~'pad
P:lW:l:lS lJod1!ll J;)W10] ;;lip pUll '~qOJ:>!W lldn iu!f.Jado
)0 A1m'l!ssod ;)tp Aq P;;llpX::l aJ;)1lII. A::ltp 'SJ;)M;)Jq <lwoq Ap1:lW:
:l:>UO 'lJod1fll P:lllljllA AflU;;lj:lJ S,AlP;)tp:nr mmrqp:>uopuEqll
Ull W;)tp P;)1lII.0qs S{ll!j9JO (::rnS) uop~uno:I l~1UdOf'l~P"'lI
U01:lydeJS U;)q1lll. P;)Stl;)fd :U::l1lll. 1~ 111 'tuJg J:ilAU<lQ
11 '(::>QcIH) UO!lll,IOWO::> iU!1lII.:lJg 1U!OcI t{i!H ;;lq1 ]0 SJ;)U1lII.0 dlfJ.
.... . tpD..patI
D sa.... ........."
';)I!l.f1lll.tpJOM :>qPfl1OA\
1l;)11l j!t{d1l1io~ JO ;)leJS S,hU;)Sll ~U!UUllfd 11 U!tp!1lII. UO!lllZ!UlliJo
;l1t:pd01ddlllSOW <ltp pug OJ tpre;lS:llI 'itf!dOf;)A;)P ff!lS
are SW19 M;)U tp!q1lll. U! J;)'lfJllW iU~:ltU:l Ull S! S!tp lnq fS'[l dq1
U!tp!1lII. l;)'lfrew{lluo!i~l II Mllq :lAOqll j);)UO!lU;)W SW1g ::lip nv
'Aflj:lJ!P S;)!l!{lldr'!unw.tp!1lll. SU!{lldP buow
pUll ;)WP pU:lds 01. padU l:liuOI OU oq1lll. s.g!Jl1l:l SUO!l'1l:l!unUIUIOO
01 {ll;)ddll hql 'J;lAOa10'N '13jUllU:lltf!llW 1;)1lII.Ol JO]
,umq!suodS:lJ :l'lflll pUll ;)yq!ssod 1aA:lJaqlA iu!Jtlqs JdM01 d~!q'll
01 palllA!lOW Alf1l:l!WOUOj;} :lre SWIg :lSdl.f.L 'J;)!1.te:l 1eytlIIaj aq1
UllqJ 1;lqlll1 JUaWUl:lAOS IEd!j!unw iU!lSoq :ltp 10} {ll:lp! S! ltrqM
)0 S!Sllq aql UO UO!Jj:lY;;lS :l1!sS;)tp1l0Jddll WJ9dq~ 'il.!p.:d!,!unw
atp pUll S:lAlasw;lq1 10J S:lnU;)A;)J SU!lllJ;)tJ;)j;\'1:lJ:lql-J;)pre:>
Suop1l:l!unWWO;):lICll :lq1 0110SS:lf e PU1l:'-,Wad01d P;)U1lII.O
''\YIEdp!unw]o ;);lssal II Sll :llnlj!d ;)tp l~lUa l;l ~,u!::> :l'f!l SW1g
:lSnlljaq SJU;)WU1aAOS IE:>OI 01 sfl*id-e UO!ldo S!t{~ "W19 Lpns
;lUO S! lllUllPV JO 'jUI 'ya.1Al!:) 'lOlj;)S j!!qnd;l1pJO] S~11l:lOApe
Sll :l,uas OJ SU!SPll S! SUad1lll.l;)q-0~]0 A.tO:3;llll:> P1!ql Y
~
~: ,_.i .;\.,' , . ,4.
.' i<...;(;'
..J V.".C
145 University Avenue West
'League of Minnesota Cities St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
,....,-~- _.'--:--- - ~
December2~, .1995
TO:
City. }4anagers.Ad1Tlmi~tors
1'wil1 Cities Metropolitan Area
FROM:
Ann Higgins, IGR Representative
RB:
Site Selection . for Personal Communications Services (PeS) Systems
The newest generation of Wireless communication technology is coming to Minnesota and cities
Will pay a integral role in its implementation" If you haven't yet heard about personal communications
..~ervicei(PCS), you'aoonwill... .'
Two ~, Sprint Telecommunications Venture and American Portable
,Teleeo~nsare preparing to enter-the Twin Cities market. Although PCS is similar to current
. celltd8:t'tecbnoloaY,itmust be implemented in a significantly different manner. The new technology will
require ~y greater antenna density than existing cellular technology. The siting of these new
. anteDDa faeilities. will involve nearly all cities in the seven-county area"
Due to the intense pl1t.,ning and siting requirements of this new technology, both Sprint and
American. Portable have engaged wireless communications consultants to gather information on local
zorlhJg ~. and to evaluate and identify potential sites around. the Twin City area. Last week,
~Staff m.etWitb. representatives of these firms to learn about the technology and to ascertain if the
~'could_iat our members. as this new technology is implemented"
sprint.. tepJ:eSented. by SBA which is headquartered in Boca Raton.,. Florida" American Portable
....rreleeornmunicati01l$(APT) is represented by TEA Group, a telecommunications site selection company
,.;{rom AtIUta,. Georgia.
.1lle.~ .W1U1tsto assure that cities are favorably positioned to deal with this new technology"
The ~WOlIldIke to obtain copies of procedures, specific ZOIIiDgr-equirements pertaining to
~to~ a:acI other relatedte1ecomJDUDicatioDs iDfrastraeture, as well as examples of
att'reIItllavdabkt ... ~ Please send that information to the LMC office to the attention
of Jea.neu:eBach. Cities with previous experience in siting of microwave, cellular, and other
teleco11.lmU1ticatioDs .facilities should.aJso contact me directly to relay yOur city's perspective on these
~ aDdland..usepoliey concetns and willingness to provide information to other cities currently
eonsideriJJg requestsforsitinJPCS facilities"
If you. are interested in this or other telecomtn1Uli.cations issues, the LMC Telecommunications
Task ,Force wm.CODt:i.nue to monitor telecomJnunications--related developm.eJ1tS and provide a forum for
diseussiononiSaue$of~ to cities. The next sd1eduIed task force meeting will be held at the
LMCot'I'iee fJ:vm 1:00.. 3:80 p.m., OIl Frida" Janu81"119.
Attacbment
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Exhibit D
lJ281.1200
(800) 925-1122
TDD(612)281-1290
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
League of Minnesota Cities
BACKGROUND ON PERSONAL
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES (PCS)
.
The Federal Communications Commission ha$ awarded two licenses for wireless digital personal
communicationsservices(pcS) for much of the north central U.S., including Minnesota, North and
South Dakota, as well as poqions of Wisconsin and Iowa. PCS digital communications services are
expected. to enhance and compete with current cellular analog phone services. PeS will offer wide-
ranging*p&rtable and versatile applications that will enable individuaJB and businesses to use secure,
accurate over..the-airpaging, voice, fax, video and data transmission with the advantage of a single
phone number available at any location to which the. t:ransm.ission is sent - as long as the signals can be
received. FCC auctions of wireless spectrun:1 will continue next March, with the possibility of two more
PeS licenses to beaw:arded for Minnesota and other areas in the north central portion of the country.
Receiving and transmitting those signals will depend on an extensive infrastructure, with many
more sites required for PCS antenna, towers, and smaller repeaters to provide the flexibility and
uaiversality'of service necessary for PeS to be fully operational in this area. Many more sites will be
required for pes eqWpmentthan the type and number of towers required for cellular communications.
\Vith that in mind, cities need to be pr~ to consider local land use, zoning, lease agreements and
other site..re1ated.considerations when responding to site selection inquiries and requests.
With the.expectation that'increased affordability ofPCS will drive down prices, those working
on behalf of new wireless communications providers insist that such services will replace land-line plain
old' telephone service (POTS). Cellular phone services may be forced to change over from current
analog to digital technology in order to compete. AP, a result, more sites and equipment changes can be
anticipated.
.
In the November issue of the Louisiana Municipal Review published by the Louisiana Municipal
.Association (LMA), an article describing the arrival of PeS technology in that state pointed out that the
industry will need to build. as many as 100,000 new towers throughout the.country over the next five
years. By comparison there are just 15,000 towers in place nationally for celluiar communications.
The industry expects there to be as many as 160+ million PCS subscribers by 2003, cOIIlpared
with 2S million cellular users. In Louisiana, efforts are underway to identify city property where towers
will be located. Using as much public property as possible reduces the impact on neighborhoods and
other portions of the community of the larger number of sites required by PeS providers. Co-location
;Usa becomes a serious consideration in efforts to convince providers to place equipment on a single
tower, eliminating a .number of sites which would otherwise be required.
The city of Huntsville, Alabama bas completed a master lease ~reement to receive 15 percent of
the gross lease revel1:ues earned from. use of PeS towers which are available as co-Iocations for other
providers. The city also anticipates using the towers for its ownCOO'lmunications systems. Industry
. spokesmen indicate that such .facilities can be used. for police .conwunications,.lighting posts for parks
and athletic fields and other uses.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
il21281.1200
(800 )925-1122
TDDf612l281-1290
F:lX r312 2S1~129~.
,
~
r
;
I
I
I
i
~
I
I
.
I
i
..
,
,
, .
,'-
Li:8IUeJoins NLC petition for reconsideration of FCC
prellOempdonof local zoning authority
Ann Higgins
The ~"basjoined more than
30 otherstate:.municipalleagues in
signing the petition fi~ Aprill7 by
the National League of Cities (NLC)
that requests the Federal CommW1ica-
tic>nS CommisSion (FCC).fO reconsider
rules that pre-empt most Ioc~ zoning
regulation of satellite earth station
antennas. for delivery of video pr0-
gramming and direct broadcast satellite
services.
Minnesota cities and other cities
nationwide are strongly pt'()teSt:iDg FCC
action taken last mondlthat intrudes
into 1ocahoning.building code and
Other policies contrOlling the . placement
of satellite dishes. The League. alOng
With NLC. the U.S. Conference of
MJyors and the National Association of
Counties, objects to rules that make it
im~ible for local governments to
establish or enforce rules and proce-
dures. for instalbltion and siting of the
rapid proliferation of satellite dishes.
As a result of FCC actions. beginning
Aprill? cities are not allowed to
restrict installation of satellite dishes
with diameters of one meter or less in
residential areI$. Cities are also not
allowed..t6.tegulatethe insWlation or
siting of dishes oftw<>tneters or Ies$ in
commercialmd business locations.
'I'biit ruleIQtCescities toapp(t)aCh the
FCC to resolve local ~ dispQtes.
rathetthanallowing cities to exhal1st
jlIdieial~als.
The League.qrees .with statements
made <Ita pressCOOfe.rence last week
by the mayors~fKnoxviHe. 1N and
Dearbonl,MI outside the FCC office in
WUhington.D.C. Mayor VICtor Ashe
and MayorMidlaeI Guido declaRd
_.$beh actions by the FCC establish
the agency as. "de facto natiOnal
roning boItd" that rules on whethe:rto
allow me exercise of traditional local
auch0rity. Such Nles are unacceptable
. and impose costly bU. on local
~yers. It will be extremely coStly
for cities to file individual petitions
with the FCC to overcome these Nles.
April 19, 19%
Cities must collectively urge federal
policymakers to balance the need for
competition and promotion.of new
technologies with local interests that
seek to enstlre that facility siting and
installation is carried out in an orderly
manner with appropriate consideration
of local weather. structural standards,
aesthetics and historic preservation.
Comments made by the FCC
suggest that their legal advisors.beUeve
the federal TelecommW1ications Act of
1996 gives the commission broad
powers to pre-empt local authority. In
issuing the final rule. the FCC rejected
local government and association
filings urging the commission to
respect local authority and traditional
powers.
Until the role is stayed by court
action or reconsidered by the FCC.
cities are barred from regulating
installation. maintenance or use of such
satellite dishes. All local regulations are
presumed to be unreasonable unless a
city is gnmted a specific FCC waiver to
allow the regulation to go forward.
CiteS are therefore prevented from
taking my civil. criminal. administra-
tive or other legal action to enforce
regulation of these satellite dishes until
each city petitions the FCC for a
waiver of those rules.
Beginning April I? , homeowners
and businesses will be allowed to
install dishes anywhere on their homes,
buildings or property (even in historic
districts). Wlless the city files a petition
with the FCC and wins a waiver. In
order to win a waiver. cites must file a
petition rebutting the presumption of
unreasonableness by showing that local
regulations are necessary to accomplish
"a clearly defmed health or safety
objective, and that the requirement is
no more burdensome than necessary to
accomplish that objective. ..
The far-reaching roles adopted by
the FCC were printed in the March 18
Federal Register on page 10896. The
rules implement Section 20? of the
federal TelecommWlications Act of
1996, which direct the FCC to adopt
roles.baning local government actions
that obstruct a viewer's ability to
receive video over-the-air reception of
television broadcast signals. multichan-
nel multipoint or direct broadcast
satellite programming services. Unless
cities can demonstrate to the FCC. on a
case-by-case basis. that local regula-
tions have clearly defined health, safety
or aesthetic objectives in the text of the
actUal regulation or that local concerns
of a "highly specialized or unusual
nature" exist. the FCC fmal order
declares that all local zoning. land-use.
building, historic preservation or other
regulations that limit transmission or
reception by satellite dishes or that
impose more than minimal costs on
antenna users. are pre-empted. The
FCC also requires local regulations to
carry out such objectives "without
unnecessarily burdening" access to
satellite services. and fair and effective
competition among communications
service providers. I"
New compost rules proposed
JoelJamnik
The MinJ1es<)ta Polluti9n Control Agency is proposing a new role
regulating the operation of compost facilities. including those owned and
operated by cities. Comments on the proposed role will be accepted by the
agency until May 22. No public hearing is scheduled. A copy of the pub-
lisbednotice and the proposed rules is available from the League fax library.
The fax librarY number is (612) 215...:C039 and the roles. are #64030. 1"
Exhibit E
.
.
lMc
r..-". ",jMmntlflfJfII Cili.
C_P'~..l . d'._
145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, Mi.'f 55103.2044
Phone: (612) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122
Fax: (612) 281-1299 · TOD (612) 281-1290
April 23. 1996
TO:
Manager. Administrator. Clerk
Ann Higgins. IGR Representative
FROM:
RE:
Examples of rower/antenna lease agreements
Below is.. .ti$ting of cities from whom the League baS either information andIorexamples of
cutre1ttorprcvious lease aar~nf$ with cellular. paghlg. PCS or other wireless
teleC~mk:ations service providers. Our effort here is to provide you with some general
gtlklance on the experience of cities in concluding arrangements to provide public space on
water towers or Other city-owned property for tower or.~ facilities.
In FebntarY. we initially surveyed cities to learn more about what types of arrangements cities
were successful in concluding for the management and siting of telecommunications towers
and.~. !tis evident that cities must exercise care to carry out leasing/pricing
negotiations to ~ their needs while DOt taking any actions that would raise price-fixing
concemson the part of tdecommUnicatiODS companies.
~.oflease tetmS and monthly/annual rents:
City
Term
Payment
Bloomington
5 yr. renewable;
2 additional. Syr.
tetmS
$7S0/mo.; $900/mo.
on first renewal;
Sl,08Olmo. - 2nd term
BrooJdyn Park
1 yr. renewable
$4OS/mo.
.'
BurDsvil1e
5 yr. renewable;
additional 5 yr.
teml
variable, depending on
single or multi-use;
3 pereemlCPI increase
Circle Pines
6 yr. renewable;
3 additional 6 yr.
termS
DO amount stated;
annual payment in
advance; 3 percent
increase multiplied by
# yrs. in expiring term
Exhibit F
.~~: ~.~~:~~-=- ".??(:}?:"":;:~:-=-: _:....E:=-!?.:.:..!.~~~-:: .~~- ..~:<:-; ::::,f?:';.:..~::?
'~~ld -lfl
03 s.I!ed~l ~:)Z :DfeUI Ol.ptH 1l1~md~~ I~ ;}AOm~l 03 SAep OE .$'eq ~SS;}I alp 'uo-p,~:n
lO uO!DJ!d:Guodn 'aopoo uw~ SAEp 06 uodnA:1.md lalflJ~01 p;lpJAcud S! UOpmrm;}~
'(UO!Stl~l:G AU! JO) ~t alp JO uO!l1U!dx~ ;ltp 01 Jopd SAEp 09 ~I 11 :l:)pou u~ ~~
das~I ~tp JO Alp a1p ..I;RpJ~ s~pm mu:n ~A ~;}A!Ssa:J:ms JO) re~:maI 3!l'BU101tll :a~a
'mu:n ~nbasqns JO I8J1JU! M.p '0 11U~M.p JOuo~dx_
:np 01 JO!ld stpUOlII 6 ~ 11 ~I atp ~~ OJ1tI;m.tJ)O :l:)JlOU ~pNt.aAJ! ~IQQ:l JO
Al!3 alp .I;tJ1!; SS:lpm :)J1~ .QD. spo~ 'lpIlOW-ZI _A!Ss;o:ms JO) SJ'BA\z:a.J:lf.RduAPfOGJ&
'PO~ q:ns...<uJ
}O ptId ;xP aJopq s.Wp 091Saf 11 RCpo.;xp 01 ~!lou e jl1!A!i Aq spo~ re~..t1l;lA"auo ~
)0 AtI'B ia!mP ~ atp ~u.ua Aem ~I ;tp 10 Al!O -ttL 'tU.1:Q ~ 10 anar~.JO
~ M.p 01 1O!Jd SlpUOUJ 9 ~ 1'B ~ alp}O ~alp ~D OJ uopmlJU! s.~I .:Jcp jO aA~
lsnnt =ssat dIU .~ A:RlllLAl-c pue '~!AOld S! UO!SlI.,D .m;.(-;mo 'B lltl:J)..J1Mil~ paz
;tp.Jo p1I~ ;tp JV 'SfUJ;l ~ JO} ~I ptI:JlX~ 01 J'q8ptpJIA ~I ~~Q1d :~II
'~J Jetp tl! J1YdI~;)Q Aem UO!J'BtU.1OJU!. jf.D.A\OUO.J:XU 'mr.x;n
~ ~ ~ tl! SlSd.1d1U! ls;q .I!;tp~!O.I~ 01 JllJP'Cn.UI ~ prnoqS$;IJl!:>
SIIl.I8J. . JBA;\W'd1I
.
.tIIr.>> re~QtW AU! JO fBflJU! ;ap}0 uO!J1U!dx:l .atp.01 Jopd SAEp. Of JseaI 1'1 ~;m;u 01:100 .1WmJ!
S1!}0 Al!O alp sarJ!lOU aassaI atp ~p:m SUIJa1 :lA!SSaoons JO);pa~~ Alreo!1~$JomI
au 'spopad ~A ~ J'tU0!J!PJ>'B..m0} JO); aslal.atp pualX:l Aem ~.alp :1IJQ: ~ Jupds
~~A~
~ a3p0lI;np:J1Ep _tp mo.gs.<Ep 99E s~'!tIJUI.I:n ~l ~ 'A1.md ~lpO.atp.Ol =!1ooq:>ns
saA!i ~saI alp JO Al!O _tp Jatp~JI "aseaI _tp }O StlO!J!PUOO pue SUUal atp JO Alm JO 3~
tl! S! ~I atp JO ULIal q:ms Alm }O uO!J'EJ!dx- alp 01 Jopd SAEp 091S8a13'B .A\WHIaJ 01 IOU 1tI~
Sl! }O AJ!O ;It{1 saY!lOU -~1 atp Ssa]Utlll,Ua1 _A!~ ttO~ JO} pa~:Ja_J A:neo!JWI01'DlS! ~(
au "SUIJa1 ~naJ naA ~ J'tU0!1'!pp'! .moJ JOJ ~I _lp~lX_ Aem=ssaI 9q1... :qrJ JO!.W
'UL1:J11'Btp JO ptIaatp 01 Jo!JdsA:Bp OSllmI l'B~tU~
OllU;]U! }O a3!lOlI naU!JA\ .RnpO _lp saA;j Aued J_tt1!a wan UL1:J11etpJ:J1j'!SUU:J1 }itm.tre
.I0) ptI'B pop;d ~A 1 J;apoUI JO}. ~03 Iretts lU~'8 ~I atp 'tI:rJ;Q~JCI.~atp
01 Jopd SA'tp 0811wa[ J'8 a3!lOlI ~iaJA!g Aq AJnd Jatp!aAqpa~U=qIOU seq~I
-lp'p' '1IO!Stl:J1D JeaA ~ PJ!lIl.;lt{1 JO ~ alp IV .StU.Ial re~:JaaJ JO f'B!Jra! _tp}O uO!1U!dx~ ~01
JOJjd sA:Ep 061wa[1'8 ~I :nf.l ~aJ 0110U 1tI~ Sl! }O~S;I ;It{1 S;JfJ!JOUAJ~;ql (q) JO ~UUal
J'B~:m;u .10 fe!1!U! ;ql}O u~dx_ .~ OJ .Iopd sA:Ep 06 ~I l'! ~Za.I OllOU lU~s;l! JO AJ!O
alp sa!P.3OU =ssaI atp ('8) ssap:m ~ _A!Ssa:Jonstt3!a JOl p_~:JaaJ AlreoJlWIOltTe S!~I au
'spop;d fUA:JaaJ J'taA ~ J'tU0!l!Pp'S =Jtp JO} ~I alf.l pu~x~Aum~I ~:mpIO~
'pop;d alp }O ~~" aJO}~
SlpUOUI 9 mal J'! AJ!:) atp 01 aopou jtl!AIi A:qm:n lfluom-Z] ;It{1 pualXa A'BW~{ ~ :u~3
'UU;)) ltm.IJn:)
;It{1}0 uO!J'EJ!dxa alp 01 Jopd SAEp OE lwaI l'EpU_JXa O)lOU ltmU! Sl! }oaopoutmuptA Al.!3
:;)tp $;lA!8 ~I atp ssaJtln po~ aA!ssao31lS tt3!a JO} mal ;tp pU:n.x~ Olpal'Bi!lQO~. aassaI-U .~
'spopad JeaA-9 pmO!1'!PP'B =npJ01-SEaI ~lp )0 uual alp pualX~ A'eUI~SaI ~lp :~ ap.l!:> ~
.
.
D l!q!llxg
I
~~;.t".:
" tJ3vd'tstJ'"- .s.n tJtJS
SSI\\ lU3WPU3WY :>JBdms..uoveg :HU.
"S3A!1~lU:.lS;ud3~ JO 3snoH "sOn 3lfl U!
Al!lof~w 8u!WI3QA\l3AO uu Aq P31dop8
An~u!8!l0 38~n8uuI S31arodJoOU! 966 1
]0 l:>Y SUO!1~:l!unwWO:>313.L3tlL
"A:)u38~ ~n8;u
3lmS 3Ql Aq J311~ SlQl JO UO!lV
-J3p!SUO:l l3qunJ 1SU!V8~ ~n8.m 01 UO!1
"SluawaJ!nbaJ
a;Jets MSU laBWOI MOO
U'efd PlIlOltS samo lIlQ '30 1\8:M 6001
e weas !au uoseas S)fJ0MeJ!.:I
~nbeJ ~aJl:J -e e6ecI
~~ iupptJ! ~ JO sasJn():>
Q(<t!ssod ~UO:l os{v ;uv 53!1
-!JOqlml ~ :a{qV:> .(8OO'1".mmu
S!Ql U! S1~ ,~:) 1:>3lOJd 01 UO!1:>V
JO W{d~ll. UO sUO!lVPU3W
-t.IJOOQJ 3:>JBW 01.~ ~S8l{ 3:llOd
'IS8.L S~WWO:>:a{3.L 3W1 :HU.
"UOp:lW P3J~ Slql.01~;U
a. a1tKI;ud 01 SJOlWlS!U!Wpy SUO!1
-v~wWOOQ(~.L Al!W\UlW03.JO UO!1
-a!:>ossV ~ ;np puu Al!JOqlny
3q ueq.mqnS ;np JO S3A!11fJU3S;Ud;u
Ql!M. pauajU03 S8II 3~ :HU.
,:spunw8
:J!{qrtd ~ JO sAQ(P Sl3anS""~AOq'e
JO '1\\0(3q'UO.. S3!1ill:>VJ Puu lU~!nl>>
~unW1llO:>3131}0 UO!1v:>Ol
;np..mAO suopIJI~.l:)VU3 01 A1!Joqlnv
[R:IOI.~q8m) 0$flZ 1\\1l( 3mS 1Vql
l:)V} 3ql a!ds3p 'S3!l!:> U!Ql!l\\ Alll\\-.JO
-SlqJ!J :J!{qnd~;u 01 ..uo!1:JfPS!Jllf
~A!snt:>Y3.. :>fidPl S3A!I La J31dmo
~w 11rQ1 ~3q 1S3h\ "s-n
"a.al ;mns .J3pURS3!1!:l
01 p31U1Ui Al!Joqlrm alp PUoA3q lU31\\
p3nim 1S3h\ "sOn suo~ PUU S3:>UUU
-!llJO 3SOqI\\ S3!1!:) :1I\OJ JO 3UO '(nea
"lS JO At!:> alp UIO.IJ UO!1~ 3ql}0 Ado:>
v P3Upnqo.~:HU. "suo!lV{n8;u
p:>OI3p!SS13S Puu ~swn:>.l!:> q:lns
"punl
ISIUlJeAe<.1x8l~" ~~se
pue V:JVH AlP ~ mOM.
If~xe. 8lsues ~ &tU.
r
JllClXIIle18U8S -,.....
U!UO!1:>!ps!JOf 3A!st1(:IJG) ... 01 3nm
3qlUOSP:>~*U..~ .:
~81IupaAnop
U! A1til\"~ :J!{qlld tl!.~
v ~u!tltJ!8UI pu1t ilJ!Sll ~S~.
-uw.{U:>GI....ql!I\\ A{~01 A~
~81'~u!nb;u 01 ~ Aqmnpn
SUOp:lWtl!;w~ 01 ~
p~x:)J()J 3fidWaql ~.~
11 '"9 lS3A\ "sOn 'a.~ uo
"3SltJ!3qlJOJ~ ~
3~OlPUU~~!J tmqnd.
3i1tU8U1 01 ~..~ le::>Ot.. ,..
1~ AI~3 ~'Il1POt..,. Aq
~:)I\\1Jl suo~OO:a{31 .,. U!
5~i~J-u.."~JO
pua alp _ I\\V{ 01U! ~ 1:>V suope::l!u
-ll1IItttOO:a{9.L 9661 ~J alp U! U!8lQO
01 :){q8tOU SSil\ A.J1snpu! auoqdQ(81 (
3tp reql (:>fidW)~ DPU!1n '..
:J!lqna.~ aip wo.g.lJOddns
U!I\\ 01 J~S!'1JO!18U 3ql.fioJ:m
S;uJS .-po $1 U! ~ ~!A.r.lS Q.l!1\\
Auvdwoo J~.1PI11lUO!83J ~
"3mS 3q1 u! npfAOJd ~3 ~
1S38.m}aip '1S9A\ 's"n UIO.IJ MA\"'.JO
-Slqit!J POOl d1tuew 01. ,u!JOllll1v J!3q1
.01 ~~n'tpf,);u!p v. ~J S3!1!:) .
SU1J1B1H uuv
AUM.-JO-SlQ3!.I3flQnd
a~8U8m 01 Al!.Ioq1ne JB~OI sa~lI.a~q31sa.M. .S~fl
966 I IS l{",nw
6~N'
I
..
u~la
sa!l~
(..
j
.
".':
". -' - - .-
~
.;
Senate tax bill includes manager
cDmpensation.disclosure
Joel Janmlk
A provision ,of the Senate Omnibus Tax Bill would impose additional
requirements for local governments at their annual tax notifation
hearings. UQ(ier current law, the hearing must include a discussion of the
petee..inctease in property taxes proposed. if any. aDd the speciftc
~f<< 'WtUch property tax revenues are being increased.
'Ihe new provision. added in committee by Senator Linda Runbeck
(R-Cin:Je PiRes). states that "at the hearing. infonnation must be presented
that separately states the job title and salary of the city clerlcladministrator
ormana"i_~h of the uneIected full-time permanent employees of
the taXing aatbority at the depamnenthead level paid by the taxing
authority for the cutrent year."r-
4M . Fund update
AD investment altemative sponsored by
the.Uaaue of Minnesota Cities
Mat is tlle4M Fund?
"'the'4M Fund.is. ~ mc:wJY market fund epecifk:alIy designed to address the
COQIPNI'Ii!InsiWe cash.~ needI of Minnesota cities and their instrumentallli
BaOkedbv..... ~ of providIngsafety,llquidilyand a competitive yield. 1he Fund is
COl1'IpIiHd .Ofthe highest quality, short-term investments allowable under Minlaesota
$tlatt.lte$415.66,The stlO1Herm lllItUIeoUtle Fundserves tominimize lheeflectof c::tIange&
iniRlereld.....'I'M Fundis managed andsenricedby Insight Inves1mentManagementand
MBI~fftvestor$ Service Corpof'ation.A fixed rate program administered by Dain
Soswol1h~ /$ available to 4M Fund perticipants, offering SUCh aIlemativesas
~ of depOSIt. U.s. Treasury and &glIIIlC)' securltles arad COR'lm8ICiaI paper.
PaIt nates .FeI:lr'uIIty 28 througb MarCh 1, 1986
.DaIe
2126
2121
2128
2129
3101
/ntef8S1
Rate'
4.Bft
4ilMl.
4Ja51l11
4.9lWo
4.84l11l
FundA-.
MaIuIiIy
18 day$
15 day$
22 day$
29 day$
29day$
'\ntltfe8t nlblIS..lWItol a118Pf)IicabIe fee$.
DlIIiIy intereSt ~ffee cheddng, AuIomatedC!earing House (ACHJ fI8YIIlet1t systems and
invelstmem~~ areamongtheseMces CilfteredbytheFund.Forll1llJ8in1OJ'm1ltion.
pIeIIIISe C8II .... Adat!n$ Of IrlsigI1t InviIstmel'It Management at (lIOO) 333a13 or {612} 371-1275.
u.s. West,
C01Idnued from page 1
supported by the National League of
Cities and a coalition comprised of the
U.S. Conference of Mayors. the
National Conference of State Legisla-
tures aDd the National Governors
Association. In speaking to the
amendment on the House floor,
Representative Stupak emphasized that
regard for local government authority
and the importanee of avoiding billions
of dollars in unfunded mandates at the
local Jevel made it essential that
language be inserted in the telecommu-
nications legislation to protect local
authority to manage the public rights-
of-way,
The language provides that
managing public rights-Of-way is not a
barrier to entry. The language was
intentionally added to overcome other
provisions that would have limited
cities ability to manage public rights-
of-way. Representative Stupak under-
stood that road design. safety concerns,
constrUction bonds, insurance, short-
and long-tenn road and utility mainte-
nance planning, and operations are
costly and substantial concerns for
local government and must be taken
into consideration in the exercise of
{ocaI regulatory authority,
Cities that have experienced
difficulties in obtaining compliance
with local right-of-way ordinances by
telecommunication service providers
are urged to contact the League to
discuss the nature of objections raised
by providers. and the outlook of the
city regarding the need for local
authority over use of its rights-of-
way. t'
LMC Cities Bulletin
o
~:
.
.
.;
1201.03
1201.03
(7) For residential districts, one recreational vehicle or piece of
equipment may be stored in required front yards; provided, that it is
IDeated within an approved driveway, it does not take up required park-
ing space as provided in subdivision 5h of this Section, it is currently licens-
ed and operable, and it is located no closer than fifteen feet (15') from
the paved surface of the street. This provision shall only apply when there
is no practical way to store the vehicle or equipment within the buildable
area of the lot.
d.Where adjacent residential structures within the same block have front
yard setbacks different from those required, the front yard minimum set-
back shall be the average of the adjacent structures. If there is only one
adjacent structure, the front yard minimum setback shall be the average
of the required setback and the setback of the adjacent structure. In no
case shall the required front yard setback exceed that required minimum
established within the districts of this Ordinance.
Subd. 4. General Area and Building Size Regulations:
a. Purpose: This Section identifies general area and building size re-
. quirements and exceptions to general height requirements in each zoning
district.
b. UseableOpen Space: Each multiple-family dwelling site shall contain
at least five hundred (500) square feet of useable open space as defined
in Section 1201.02 of this Ordinance for each dwelling unit contained
thereon.
c. Height:
- ~r
(1) The building height limits established herein for districts shall
not apply to the following:
(a) Belfries.
(b) Chimneys or flues.
(c) Church spires,
(d) Cooling towers, mechanical and air conditioning equipment
when screened from view,
(e) Cupolas and domes which do not contain useable space.
(0 Elevator penthouses.
(g) Flagpoles,
(h) Monuments,
(i) Parapet walls extending not more than three feet (3') above the
limiting height of the building.
-:/'1 r
.....,' ......'
Exhibit H
.
.>
..
1201.03
1201.03
..
+
*'
(j)Water towers.
(k) Poles, towers and other structures for essential services sub-
ject to subdivision 10 of this Section.
(l) Television and radio antennas not exceeding twenty feet (20')
above the roof.
Exception: Ham radio antennas over twenty feet (20') may be
allowed by conditional use permit as provided for in Section
1201.04 of this Ordinance, provided that:
i. The ham radio must be licensed by the Federal Com-
m.unications Commission (F:CC).
ii. Construction of the antenna requires a building permit.
iii. The antenna must be located within the buildable area
of the lot.
iv. The antenna must be fenced or so designed as to be dif-
ficult to climb.
4)r..(2) The requirements of Minnesota Rules 8800.1200 (Criteria for
Determining Air Navigation Obstructions), as may be amended, are hereby
adopted by reference.
d.No excluded roof equipment or structural element extending beyond
the limited height of a building may occupy more than twenty five per-
cent (25Dio )of the area of such roof nor shall such equipment exceed ten
feet (10') in height unless otherwise noted.
e. Efficiency Apartments: Exccptfor elderly housing, the number of ef-
ficiencyapartments in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed five percent
(SDio) of the total number of apartments.
f.Minimum Floor Area ~ Commercial Structures: Commercial buildings
(principal structure) having less than one thousand (1 tOOO) square feet
of floor area may. only be allowed upon approval of a conditional use
permit as provided for in Section 1201.04 of this Ordinance, provided that:
(1) The structure is built on a lot with a minimum lot area of no
less than ten thousand (IOtOOO) square fe.et.
(2) Adequate on-site parking is provided.
(3) The architectural character of the building is similar in character
to buildings in the surrounding area.
--
r
-'
poomaHJf{S Jo 410
EM
AmJpOl ~ B~Z ~ ilf!Stm~,.~ P!8S JO ~. Oqt..spuam
~UlO:)Qt 11OdoIS,1~:l ~ .n .~ repuMQS,~~dnp JOllOP
-lUOdo pve ~. 01p JOJ l~ ~S V ~ IT'ft1S.~
gu~U\TZ .aql. '..r.HU~.<to ;JQl JO {VAO.lddv gqJ 1lqA~ uodn (,)
*uv{d ~A~ atpuodn ~.pasodo.Jd
gqJ;JO ~g 31ppU8 ~ptm se pU8 .~ se 'ho 8tp JO ~
IUlJUgJpue ~ 'tpINt(. gqJ uodtt .1:r.)foId posodo.td;JQl JO ~p ~
>>J7!SUOO nvqs ps. All:) ~Jll3lp 'Uo~ .SNJ II! ~aIse .IDOJA
-.IX ~ JO ~ .aqa. JOJ SlIO~nddviu'p:3p~ 1lI (t)
.~n 8tp JO s~ puu tW(d ;M.~.otp
tp!JA l~ posodo.td .011 10 ~dmoo gqJ ~ se siUJP11!J ..8!Ir ~
-PV ~ 3111 ot:.iup!JIA II! .lJO(b;r nvqs ~.uD. ;JqJ,. (€)
.~ spud pm ~ll!P1O
JOlPtl'I tl'IJd aA.~. ;)tp ~ ~aI. s,~ ~. iupdaI
l8AOJCide pU8 ~aI: SJIf JOJ ~a ~!:> ~. ~ nopmtJOJll! ..~.
-:m ptl'l (s)d1rtu ~. ,.pm~ Jl1RlS JOt~ ~ ~ (l)
~ro.td posodo.td .gqt ~~aI.Ol ~~ug
~D ~JOJ ~ p:m=pse uopBUUOJll! ~ >>'PO pa sdum nv
J01V,:QS~~V ~ 1JIp.1p!A\ ~ IfItlS ~ q~ns JO .muNlOI~.S=!A
-J~ I8PtmSg SDO!AaJd gqt 10Atm JO UOp~ gqt Ol JOPd(I)
:~baI ~3OJd .iuvAOfiOJ 3111. U'!. ~
UO!l1RDJOJU! ;)tp uodn pmtq gq If8t{S ~ ~!:> .gq:t...... Aq. }lL\o.tddv
'~ug ~!~ gqt Aq "(8Ao:a:Idv. ~ Al!~ gtp Aq p;ms9! lpxr.nx! }'Vpads
~ at!l'lbaI JIVlIS '.ua-JO-~ ~qnd II! UVtp >>tpO suo~ ,., .~
~ Ol posodo.td am pm 1::oDd 3UO U'etp QJOUI g.ugs ~ ~. am 1p'flI~
'A)l ((€) .~ Au!xP U8Ip SSg'f san nO!ssplIStl'I.1:l ~~ ~AO ptl'l
.~ no~ ~g ptlllOJimptm;.ropnq!J$!P f8OOlJOl ~trgQd,d
'sony ~ puno.1i.x;Jpun .IIV :l!lJ1lgd JU!:KXiS JOJ ~~.~
'~~ug A!:> otp Aq pgAOJddv ~ ~
~ ~ Jl1RlS ~ itf!UOZ Atm II! AVIA-Jo-lq8y.t:ygqnd Atl'I U! ponIllsu!
ngqlA 'A}I ((() ganp Axpp tl'Itp SsaJ snopv:Jsqns ptl'l ~ .UOJSSfwsl:le.lJ
~~g ~AO ptII 'san IIO~ ~~~ punOJinpun 'UOpnq!illSlP
JE:lOI JOJ .~ '$8U!I~~ puno.1i.x;Jpun IIV:l~d re~s .'q
.~ q:>ns JOJ
~ ~o;rd pu1f ~ JO ~ II! pg"([B$ll! gq asp. Pfnoqs .
~:>~ f81ln*a~p AI~A.pV gq lOtI '(I!It\ AlK) ;)tp JO am.Jl~1t\
ptm ~gJVS 'tpf1=l 3111 mp..,loJUllfAU ~ q~ns..1I! suo~sqns .ptm s:JtI'g ~SS!lU
-Stl'I.Il :>~Ig ~ 'saun QtI()q~~ se q~ns S~!JW~fB!1tI~ JO uop
-BIf8lSU! ~JOJ ~0Jd ~ S! nO!S"fA!PCIns S!IIl JO gsod,md ~:~ ..,
~ IilltIlsig"'ol.pqnS
€O'IOlI
(0' lOll
r.
.- ,. ..
..
.,'.
j'
.
.
....
':.;I
1201.03
1201.03
its issuance, the applicant may appeal said decision to the Board of Ap-
peals and Adjustments under the rules and procedures as set forth in Sec-
tion 1201.05 of this Ordinance.
d.Requirements for Conditional Use: All tranS11)ission pipelines (i.e.
pipelines DOt required for local distributing network) and overhead
transmission and substation lines in excess of thirty three (33) KV shall
be a conditional use in all districts subject to the following procedural
requirements:
(1) Prior to the installation of any of the previous essential ser-
vices, the. owner of such services shall file. with the Zoning Admini~trator,
all maps and other pertinent information as deemed necessary for the City
Council to review the proposed project.
(2) The Zoning Administrator shall transmit the map and accom-
pattpng information to the City Council for its review regarding the pr0-
jeCt's relationship to the Comprehensive Plan and partS thereof. A part of
this review shall be a written report from the City Engineer.
(3) The City Council shall hold the necessary public hearings as
prescribed by this Ordinance for conditional uses.
(4) In considering the applications for. the placement of essential
services. as. regulated. by this subdivision, the City Council shall consider
the advice.and recommendations of the City staff and the effect of the
proposed project upon the l1ealtb, safety and general welfaze of the City,
existing and. anticipated; and the effect of the proposed project upon the
CompreheDsivePlan.
Sabd. 11. Signs:
a.hzpose: This subdivision is established to protect and promote health,
safety, general welfare .and order within the City of Shorewood through
the estabti~nt of a. comprehensive and impartial set of standards,
regulations and procedures .goveming the type, numbers, size, structure,
kx:ation, height, lighting, . erection, use and/or display of devi~ signs or
syzrabo.ls serving as a visual communication. media. to persons. situated
withill or upon public rights-of-way or properties. The provisions of this
subdivision are intended .to encourage opportunity for effective, orderly
cnmtnunica.tion by reducing confusion and hazards resulting from un
necelSaty aadIor. indiscriminate use of co.",,,,unication facilities.
b. Petmitted and Prohibited Signs:
(1) Permitted Signs: The following sigDsare allowed without a per
mil. but shall comply with all other applicabJe provisions oftbis
0rtJi'IJam-.e:
ea) Public signs.
993
City of Shorewood
--
';-. .-
fir
e.
..
~
1201.02
1201.02
DWELLING UNIT: A residential. building or portion thereof intended
for occupancy by a family, but not including hotels, motels, nursing
homes, boarding or rooming houses, or recreational vehicles.
Subd. S. EARTH SHELTERED DWELLING UNIT: A strUcture which com-
plie$ with . applicable building standards and which is constructed so
that:
a. Eighty percent (80%) or more of the roof area is covered with
a minimum depth of twelve inches (12") of earth; and
b. Fifty percent (50%) or more of the wall area is covered with
a minimum depth of twelve inches (12") of.~
BFFICJENCY .. APARTMENT: A dwelling unit consisting of one prin-
cipal room exclusive of bathroom, hallway ,closets. or dining alcove.
(Ord. 180. 5-19-86)
ElDERLY HOUSING: A dwelling or · group of dwellings where the
occupancy is restricted to persons sixty two (62) years of age or older,
or which qualifies as "housing for older persons" under the Federal Fair
H()USing Act. (Ord. 243, 9-9-91)
Subd.
. The erection, construction, alteration, or
mamtenance 0 u rgrouna or overhead gas, electrical, steam, or water
tnmStDission or distribution systems, collection, communication, supply
ordi$pOSal systems by public utili~s, municipal or other governmental
agencies, but not including buildings.
6. FAMILY: OneorIDOre pe(SOI1S each related to the other by blood,
marriage, adoption,or foster care, or a group of not more than three (3)
persons not so rel,ated. maintaining a common household and using
common cooking and. sanitation facilities.
FARM: (See Agricultural Land.)
FENCE: . A. partition,. structure, wall . or gate erected as a dividing
marker, barrier, or enclosure.
FENCE .. BOUNDARY UNE: All fences located within eight feet (8')
of a property line.
FENCE: INTERIOR YARD: All fences located eight feet (8') beyond a
propelty line.
mJ.JNG: The act of artificially · depositing any rock, soil, gravel, sand
or Other material.
FIRE LANE: A portion of a platted or dedicated public right-of-way
extending to Lake Minnetonka or Lake . William and as is designated
and. numbered. on the Official .ZoDing Map.
FLOOD: A general and temporary condition of partial or complete in-
undation of normally dry land areas from:
1091
e
.
\~
;,r
ORDINANCE NO. 150
AN ORDINANCE AMEN'DING ORDINANCE NO. 77 IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 77 in the City of
$horewood, being an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, general welfare,
by regulation of the use of land, location, area, size, use, and
height of buildings on lots and. the density of population in the
City of Shorewood, Minnesota.
City Council of the City of Shore wood does ordain:
Section 1. Ordina...11.ce No.. 77, Section 25, Subd. 3,
shall be amended by adding the following:
"C. Telephone switching station and accessory
communication antenna, provided:
1. That the site shall be landscaped with
low maintenance plant materials.
2. That any building shall be of decorative
ma.sonry'construction.
3. That the facility shall not interfere
with other communication systems.
4. That no signage is allowed.
5. That the facility shall comply with
requirements of Section 7 of this
Ordinance."
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective
from and after its passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITYOF SHOREWOOD, this
Z4tq day of October , 1983.
Robert Rascop, mayor
ATTE$T:
Sandra L~Kennelly, City Clerk
Exhibit I
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONTINUATION
OF CDBG FUNDING FOR THE SOUTHSHORE SENIOR CENTER
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has supported services for its elderly and
disable residents via Senior Community Services' Southshore Senior Center with the
allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood feels that the provision of services for its
elderly and disabled residents is of great importance and should be continued.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Minnesota:
That the City of Shorewood recommends to the Consolidated Pool Selection
Committee that CDBG funding of Senior Community Services' Southshore Senior
Center be continued.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHOREWOOD this 9th day of February, 1998.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATIEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
Jt8
~ ~~~a~~ ~~S~~1~~i~~~n:'~~~o~~:ne 541-101~__F~_541~841
BOARD of DIRECTORS
John Nelson
President
February 2, 1998
IIO)~~~U \~' '.='\
:~~ FEB 31998 ~
1
1
i 8--,Y_ ___
Dwight Johnson
1 st Vice President
Laurie lafontaine
Treasurer
Mayor Tom Dahlberg and City Council Members
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Peggy Kelly
2nd Vice President
Dr. C. (Ike) Njaka
Member-at-Large
Dear Mayor Dahlberg and Council Members:
Senior Community Services requests that the City of Shorewood
pass, and send back to us, a resolution favoring a continuation of
funding the senior programs that the City has supported in the
past. A sample resolution is attached for your consideration. We
would like to include the resolution in our application to the
Consolidated Pool for the next Community Development Block
Grant year.
.
Francis Hagen
Secretary
Kevin Krueger
Past President
Mary Henning
Member-at-Large
John Boeder
Peter Coyle
Robert DeGhetto
Marty Gurltz
Alko Higuchi
Gloria Johnson
Kathleen Miller
Senator Gen Olson
Curtis Pearson
Neil Peterson
Dan Ryerson
Mary Tambornlno
Leonard J. Thiel
Tom T1cen
The contact person for our request is our Southshore Senior
Center Director, Joyce Flury (474-7977). On behalf of the area
seniors who are the direct beneficiaries of the services, our thanks
for your continued support of the Southshore Senior Center. We
look forward to continuing cooperation between the City of
Shorewood and Senior Community Services.
Again, many thanks for your support.
.
PROGRAMS
~e~
Ron Bloch
Program Administrator
Benjamin F. With hart
Executive Director & CEO.
. Community
Senior Groups &
Multi-purpose
Senior Centers
cc: Jim Hurm, City Manager
. H.O.M.E.
. Senior Outreach
e
^ Unikd 1N:Iv
Ag<n<y .
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
James Hurm, City Administrator
Larry Brown, Director of Pub fie Works ~-
February 5, 1998
FROM:
.
DATE:
RE: Consideration of a Motion to Adopt a resolution Accepting Public Improvements for
Marsh Pointe Development
Attachment I is a letter from the developer's project engineer certifying that the utilities for the
Marsh Pointe Subdivision have been completed in accordance to the approved plans and
specifications.
.
These utilities have been tested and are recommended for acceptance by the City Council for the
City's perpetual maintenance. This includes the utilities within the public right of way and easements
dedicated to the City. This does not include the utilities .that w~re installed to serve Lots 9, 10 and
II of Block I (refer to attachment 2). These were approved as private utilities which will be the
responsibility of the homeowners association to maintain. Attachment 3 is a warranty bond
guaranteeing the public utility improvements for a period of two years from the date of acceptance.
Staff is recommending approval of the attach~ resolution accepting public utilities for the Marsh
Pointe Subdivision for.. the City's perpetual maintenance. A resolution is attached for your
consideration.
~9
A ResidentialCommunity on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
_.I_SChoell & Madson, Inc.
Engineers · Surveyors · Planners
Soil Testing · Environmental Services
I
I
'"
1 05BO Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1
Office 61 2-546-7601
Minnetonka. MN 55305-1 525
Fax 612-546-8065
January 16, 1998
Mr. Larry Brown, City Engineer
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Subject:
Marsh Pointe
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
.
Dear Larry:
Schoell & Madson, Inc. provided construction staking and periodic construction
observation for the public improvements in Marsh Pointe. All testing was observed by
Mr. Phil Tipka (WSB & Assoc.) on behalf of the City of Shorewood. Based on this
staking and observation, we certify that the improvements were constructed in
substantial compliance with the City-approved plans and specifications.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
.
fl<7:;,rt!/
Douglas A. Stahl, P.E.
MN Reg. No. 19584
DAS/cj
cc: Mark Anderson, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
. ((jve% 40 (!/ea%j o/En%
...~ =- . - ~- ~. ~
AffIrmatIve Action Equal Opportunrty Emplo~
Attachment
l>
:q
J1'
>"
en
%
>
0
~ ~
>
II :t:XJ
;i ;I;
=:
"(I)
-
~ ::I:
~ -0
~ 0
0 -
.. Z
r
, -f
0-
~
m
Z /UiJlU1PVI1V
t
1':
!
~
,
I .
I .
I .
.
" .
f .
f
~ .
.
.
i .
f .
.
i .
. 0
. ~
.
. .,
. ...
.
. 0
.,
'"
n
o
;;
...
5"
!
i
i
.........
.
.
~
en
e,.,
r-l:i 0)
-.- ()
:;:~ :::
-.,., 0
~~ III
.. 1=
...~ .. n-o
f~ ~ !i!! - L..__ '" ~>
I . !l' . ....
~ ~~ :. 0..,
;;; ~~ 0 f o. f ;; ~I f , 0-
,., lUi I -@=- nr-
- ...Ii> 0) It.E.. ! L. I . c . ,.,
~. 0 -...I.. . ~
..... ~-c Z fIll ! , .. t zz
0 I i I 99
... ~~ :. HI rlT I I I
... ~z z s-f. f I i
,06t . c
-~ () ;. oJ: - t--.
!!1 ~&IJ . ! i' I
;;; Ii> l fJ' I 1
,., I
... I
Vl_ I ,
NOCLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
~
SewERS - WATER MAINS - DRAINAGE - EXCAVATION
322 East Fairgrounds Road, P.O. 8ox338
Alexandria. Minnesota 56308
Telephone 320-763-5159
FAX No. 320-763-5197
January 23,1998
Mr. Larry Brown, City Engineer
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Cluf Road
Shorewood, MN. 55331
Re: Marsh pointe Project
Dear Larry:
~
_.~~ ..... '., .0"
...,\IS(r,:"
'Jj p=-- \'-:-7 I~-
.,~.
.J ,:; f'i .~~~ {}
., ~ i
:;; :'
.~
-< ~,-
~;=:-
We are enclosing the utility work maintenance bond for this
project, as per request.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Thanks
Yours very truly,
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
G\
Al Guenther
enc
cc: Doug StahliSchoel1 & Madson
.....-....----
-- ~.....\
-=. : C': \
;1 i!
:,......., '!:!
~.::..~.,~ i; j/
..,
. I
.
.
Attachment 3
(INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT)
5-TATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
ss
)
On the day of
a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared,
,19
, before me,
to me known to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, as Principal(s), and ac-
knowledged to me that -he- executed the same as -h_ free act and deed.
(Notarial Seal)
Notary Public,
County,
My commission expires
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF
MINNESOTA
)
ss
~UNTY OF HENNEPIN )
.On the 9th day of
personaTIyappeared Alvin R. Guenther
to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in
that he is the Treasurer ~ of the Nodland Construction Co.,
February
,19 98
,before me
Alexandria
Inc.
the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corpo-
ration; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so afftxed by order of the board
of directors of said corporation; and that he signed his name thereto by like order.
! - - -~-;~~:,~_~'--~ c;yk#t &. U
L=-~~l ~::ty~UbliC, :::ota
.
(Notarial Seal)
My commission expires
Jan. 31, 2000
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CORPORATE SURETY
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On this
MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN
9th
)
ss
)
day of
February
, 19 98
, before me
appeared . D. B. Kyllo
to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the aforesaid officer or attorney in fact
of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY a corporation; that..the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument
is the corp~rate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corpora-
tion by the aforesaid officer. by authority of its board of directors; and the aforesaid officer acknowledged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public,
gttdwul' ~ ~
Carver
r .......-....~~,,~.--..-~.-.......
, ;:.~r;=(. .,::~~ L- '''-:<;Z:n f
c. ;::'r~,~ C~'~.'. TV {'
_.---~~::~ ~:~~:~!~::: ~?
Countv.
Minnesota
\I 0 t3.ri~tl :5 ~~L
\;_f't~. -:.:)mmissicneXD~r::~~
J2'--~.. 3:!.."
........r'",....
-~ ,~= - =. '-.\~,
*54092568
II
UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
CEDAR RAPIDS, lOW A
MAINTENANCE BOND
KNow ALL By THESE PRESEN1S: That we
of
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
P. O. BOX 338, ALEXANDRIA, MINNESOTA 56308
as PrincipaL and the UNITED FIRE & CASUALlY COMPANY, an Iowa corporation of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and authorized
to do business in the state of MINNESOTA as Surety, are held and fumly bound unto
CITY OF SHORE.WX)D, MINNESOTA
in the penal sum of*Three Hundred Five Thousand Five Hundr9d Ninety-Sev~s!*~B~ ;QQ7 OO****) Dollars,
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, wen and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety
_themselves, their and each of their heirs, executors, and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, finnly
ese presents.
Signed and delivered this 9th day of Fph"rllnry AD. 19 ~
WHEREAS, the said Principal entered into a certain contract, dated the 16th day of
May , 19!11-, to furnish all the material and labor necessary for the construction of
Utilities only for Marsh PointeLIC, Shorewood, MN.
in confonnity with certain specifications; and
WHERFAS, a further condition of said contract is that the said Principal should furnish a bond of indemnity, guaranteeing
to remedy any defects in workmanship or materials that may develop in said work with a period of two years from the
date of acceptance of the work under said contract; and
.HEREAS, the said UNITED FIRE &: CASUALlY COMPANY, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for a valuable consideration, has
agreed to join with said Principal in such bond or guarantee, indemnifying said Ci tv of Shorewood, MN .
as aforesaid;
Now, THEREFORE, the Condition of This Obligation is Such, that if the said Principal does and shall, at hislher own cost
and expense, remedy any and all defects that may develop in said work, within the period of two years from the date
of acceptance of the work under said contract, by reason of bad workmanship or poor material used in the construction of
said work, and shall keep all work in continuous good repair during said period. and shall in all other respects, comply with
all the terms and conditions of said contract with respect to maintenance and repair of said work, then this obligation to be
null and void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue in law.
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
P. ,X 338, Alexandria, MN 56308
//1/ tI~
By . I:
Alvin R. Guenther, Treasurer
I'R1NOrAL
e86'.
UNITED FIRE & CASUALlY COMPA1'\JY
P.O. Box 73909, Cedar Rapids, IA
--(). 13, ~;jJ/~
B. Kyllo ~
52407-3909
\ i :-l>:.'<~':- .;:<.i \C:"
'JND.2USSb 110-91,
tI
UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
HOME OFFICE - CEDAR RAPIDS. IOWA
CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF A TIORNEY
(Original on file at Home Office of Company -: See Certification)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY. a corPoration dulY organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Iowa. and having its principal office in Cedar RaPids, State of Iowa. does make. constitute and
appoint H. ROBERT ANDERSON, OR D. B. KYLLO, OR THERESA M. ANDERSON,
DUANE Q. JOHNSON, ALL INDIVIDUALLY.
4600 WEST 77TH 5T 5TE 105 ED~NA MN
55435
of
its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact with power and authority herebY conferred to
lawful bonds. unde:takings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature as follows:
sign. seal and execute in its behalf all
ANY AND ALL BONDS
and to bind UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY therebY as fullY and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by
the duly authorized officers of UNITED FiRE & CASUALTY COMPANY and all the acts of said Attorney. pursuant to the authority
herebY given are herebY ratified and confirmed
The AuthoritY herebY granted shall expire SEPTEMBER 19th 1999 unless sooner revoked.
This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authoritY of the following By-Law dulY adoPted by the
Board of Directors of the Company on APril 18. 1973.
. "Article V - Surety Bonds and Undertakings."
Section 2. Appointment of Attorney-in.Fact. "The President or any VICe President. 0' any other officer of the Company, may, from time to time. appoint
by written certificates attorneys-in.fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance. bonds. undertakings and other
obligatory instruments of like nature. The signature of any officer authorized herecy, and the Corporate seal. may be affixed by facsimile to any
powerof attorney or special power of attorney or certification of either authorized hereby; sucn siqnature and seal. when $0 used, being adopted by the
Company as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the C;mtpany, to be valid and binding upon the C;mtpany with the same force
and effect as though manually affixed. Such attorneys-in.fact. subiect to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority shall have
full power to bind the Company by their siqnature and execution Of any SUCh instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The President
or any Vice President. the Soard of Directors or any other officer of the Company may at any time revoke all power and authority previously given to
any attorney-in-fact.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the UNITED FIRE
to be signed by its vice. president
19th day of SEPTEMBER
& CASUALTY COMPANY has caused these presents
and its corPorate seal to be hereto affixed this
.AD. 19 9 7
By
UAL TV COMP~L A .
ANT v;c~,:,~ f
.tate of Iowa, County of LInn, ss:
On this 19th day of SEPTEMBER 1997. before me personally came JEFFREY A. CHAPIN
to me known, who being by me duly sworn. did depose and say: that he resides in Cedar Rapids. State of Iowa; that he is a
Vice President of the UN!TED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY. the corPoration described in and which executec the above
instrument; that he knows. the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corp orated seal; that
it was so affixed pursuant to authoritY given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name there!o
pursuant to like authoritY. and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation.
I, the undersigned officer of the UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY. do herebY certify that I have compared the foregoing
coPY of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the COpy of the Section of the By-Laws of said Company as set forth in said
Power of Attorney, with the ORiGINALS ON FILE IN THE HOME OFFICE OF SAID COMPANY. and that the same are correct
transc:-ipts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals. and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is
now in full force and effect
In testimony whereof have hereunto st,;bcribed
Company this
9th
day of
February
my naml1e ~d fi e.d the corporate seal of the said
19 98
V- ///
(:: .
4jj
I",",,,,
SHERYL A. McVAY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
'~12~:":: d. :Z~Q
My commission
~i). M~UOCf
expires MARCH 4 .)& 2000
,.
CERTIFICATION
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING STREETS, SANITARY SEWER
AND STORM SEWER IN THE PLAT OF MARSH POINTE
WHEREAS, on November 25, 1996, the City of Shorewood entered into an Agreement
with Lundgren Bros. Construction Inc. for the development of certain property known as Marsh
Pointe; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 2 of said Development Agreement provided for the Developer to
construct and install certain enumerated improvements within the plat of said property, which
improvements included streets, ~anitary sewer, storm sewers and concrete curb and gutter; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 16 of said Development Agreement provided for such
improvements to be subject to a final inspection by the City Engineer; and
.
WHEREAS, Paragraph 17 of said Development Agreement provided for the conveyance
of said improvements to the City by the Developer and for the acceptance by the City of such
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has completed construction and installation of the sanitary
sewer and storm sewer, and watermain , and such improvements have been inspected by the City
Engineer and found to be in compliance with the applicable plans and specifications, and
WHEREAS, the Developer is desirous of conveying said improvements to the City and
the City is desirous of accepting said improvements from the Developer.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That the City hereby accepts from the Developer the sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
and watermain within the platted right of way, excepting the utilities which are
considered private utilities which serve Lots 9,10, and 11 of Block 1 as shown in
Exhibit A), in the plat of Marsh Pointe.
2. That the Developer shall cause a maintenance bond to be furnished naming the
City as obligee for the full cost of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer
to be in effect for a period of two years from the date of acceptance hereof.
3. That the irrevocable letter of credit shall be reduced in the amounts associated with
the construction of public utilities and streets, excepting landscaping,
monumentation, and $750.00 for televising of the sanitary sewer.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shore wood this 9th day of
February, 1998.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
.
ATTEST:
.
,
t
1
i
1
l
.~.
James c. Hurm, City Administrator
t
t
.
.
.,I,
(:
I :
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
E1
I
I
01
'" I
2 I
.. I \
S' \
\
\
J/
~r
~m
~i
jl
------"
V 11Qllfx:t/
::'
~
~
;;;
,..,
....
~...
'-Z CD
....9 ()
:;:~ ::
...... 0
~~ m
. . J:
...~ It
~~ I:
~~ .
1:= CI
,.,Ul CD
!. 0
~"'C Z
~~ :.
~z z
-~ 0
~UJ .
CIl
""
o
..,
..
1!?
;;; .
,..,
...
Ul
i
i
~
.......
--.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
o
~
.,
~
~
rn
~
0.
%
~
~ 3:
>-
II :t:rJ
~ ~
=:
"en
-
~ :z::
... ~ "
~ 0
0
... -
Z
-f
m
...
o
.,
4
.
'\
'\
\
------~
\ -.,
'\
'\ ./
~/
1
I ~ ---
i ~r O"tl
!i!! - L..._. ii I!
I . t -~ ~>
.....
f o. f ; f1 . i' 0..,
lUr I I .i I
'.110. l! L I' -@- 0-
_ ..L c: or-
fI"1 ~ I ! . . ,.,
_ is r.1.- r t zz
u'1 I I I pp
tr.r I I l
. "I ; f
r;r 1--;
I t
I
I -
Subject: Near accident at Orchard Circle
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 11 :08: 19 -0600
From: Doug Miller <dougmiller@title-l.coIn>
To: cityha11 @dorthy.state.net
Please forward a copy of this message to all members of the City Council
and the Mayor.
On February 2nd, 1998 around 8:40 a.m. my son was nearly killed by a
large flat bed truck owned by S.J. Ritzer Exc., Buffalo, MN. While the
neighborhood children and some parents were waiting for the Minniwashta
school bus, a very large truck carrying a large piece of machinery
turned into Orchard Circle. Despite the fact that there were children
everywhere, the truck proceeded into the Circle scatterring children and
parents. Meanwhile, my 3 year old son was standing on the corner snow
bank, off the road, frozen in fear because the truck's trailer was
bearing down on him. The truck took the corner so poorly, that the
rear wheels of the trailer came within a couple inches of the street
sign and travelled all the way up the corner hill nearly approximately
five feet from the road. My wife, Laura Miller, saw the peril my son
~:as in and was able to run and pull him further up the hill just before
~~he truck's rear wheels travelled where he had just been standing. The
trailer missed both my wife and son by about one foot. The truck
continued on into Orchard Circle as if nothing had happened.
.~
My neighbor, Dr. Erick Englund, who witnessed this horrible scene,
stepped up on the running boards of the truck to speak to the driver.
He asked the driver if he had seen the little boy standing on the
corner. The truck driver indicated that he had seen him. Dr. Englund
then asked the man if he realized that had the woman not grabbed the
boy at the last instant that his truck would have run him over. The
driver started to roll-up his window. Dr. Englund asked if he even
cared. The driver said no, rolled up his window and backed his truck
accross Eureka Road without knowing if there was anyon-corning traffic.
He backed into the Eiden Development.
Although we have called the police, I don't believe all the responsible
~arties are being addressed. I called S.J. Ritzer Exc. and spoke with a
...:oman who represented herself as the owner of the company. She said
that the man driving the truck was the President of the company. She
also told me that she knew of nothing prohibiting them from driving into
Orchard Circle.
The City of Shorewood has allowed this Eiden/Dahlstrom development to
continue despite flagrant violations of the building permits,
development contract and other abuses. They have received numerous
warnings. At what point is the City of Shorewood going to step in and
do something. Pull their permits, investigate their activities, demand
compliance and penalize them for abuses. These people don't care about
Shorewood, why should you give them any special treatment. The fact
that they're still operating is "special treatment," Lets get a little
a tougher on these folks. Let's pull they're permits, lets investigate
further some of they're actions and inactions, Make them take
responsibility. Make sure that people like this truck driver are not
hired and that all of the construction personnel are properly advised to
keep out of Orchard Circle. Right now, I'm sure that the
Eiden/Dahlstrom team believe they can do anything they want without
repurcusions. Let's show them that they can't.
doug miller
25525 Orchard Circle
Shorewood, MN 55331
1* loA
. J
Message on the Shoreline on January 6, 1998:
Hi, this is Joyce Holcomb on Smithtown Road, 474-4768. I just wanted to make a
comment about your/our new shelter we did in Freeman Park. I am glad we did that and
hope we will have some tables in there, over there by the child's play area. But you know
what, there really is a need for one in the other place, between Kelly Field and Keeler
Field. . Those parents, and I am not one of them but I see them every day, they are so hot
watching those games. There is no shade in that spot. You know that big open area
between the two fields and there is a lot of room there. You could put another one there
nicely, it could be even twice as big. That is my first comment. And I walk there every
day and I would love a place to sit down for a few minutes with some shad~. There is no
shade over there at all. It is just hot as the devil in the middle of the summer in the middle
of the summer.
.
The second thing is, there is a picnic table in the park, not the one where you fll'St walk in
on the path but further on in and it is blue, and it has been broken for two years, and it is in
the woods. I can show you where it is. And it is broken right in the middle of it, maybe
someone hit it with an ax, but that was like three years ago. And I think it would be just
fine if you would repair it this winter and put it back in place. If you want me to meet you
there, I will show you where it is because it is kind of in the woods and in the trees. I
know people used it the first few years we lived out this way and then they stopped
because you can't use it any more. My number is 474-4768 if you have any comments on
either of these things.
.
I
t
$ID~'
.
CKNO
22375
22376
22377
22378
22379
22380
22381
22382
22383
22384
22385
22386
22387
22388
22389
22390
22391
22392
22393
22394
22395
22396
22397
22398
22399
22400
22401
22402
22403
22404
22405
22406
22407
22408
22409
22410
22411
22412
22413
22414
22415
..
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 9, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 28, 1998
TO WHOM ISSUED PURFa3E
US POSTMASTER FEB. NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
ANCHOR PAPER PAPER
G.L. CONTRACTING AMENDED FINAL PAYMENT #6
ALAN ROLEK SEC 125 REIMB
US WEST COMMUNICATIONs/ADVERTISING
LAWRENCE NICCUM STRAW BALES-SNOWMOBILES
DAHLHEIMER DIST; BEER PURCHASES
DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER PURCHASES
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER'MISC PURCHASES
HONEYWELL PROTECTION QTRL Y MONITORING
LEEFBROS. MATS
MARLIN'S TRUCKING FRBGHT
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE PURCHASES
US POSTMASTER ADD'L FEB. NEWSLETTER POST.
PERA FEB. PERA LIFE INSURANCE
MEDICA FEB. HEALTH INSURANCE
HEALTH PARTNERS FEB. HEALTH INSURANCE
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES FEB. DENTAL INSURANCE
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE FEB. DISABILITY
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE FEB. LIFE INSURANCE
AFSCMECOUNCIL 14 FEB. DELTA DENTAL
CITY OF TONKA BAY FEB. RENT-TB L1O/L1Q LIABILITY
GRIFFIN COMPANIES FEB. RENT-L1Q I
TOWLE REAL ESTATE CO FEB. RENT-L1Q II
US POSTMASTER PARK POST CARD
PERA PERA
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCOMP
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ANOKA CO SUPPORT/COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID
AFSCME COUNCIL 14 UNION DUES
MN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD
LAWRENCE BROWN MILEAGE/PARKING
KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUYERS CARD UQ/WINE
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE
US WEST COMMUNICATION
CITY OF WA YZAT A-MOTOR VEH. FORFEIT. VEHICLE REGISTRATION
BELLBOY CORP. LIQUOR PURCHASES
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISClSUPPL Y PURCHASES
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. BEER'MISC PURCHASES
Page 1
AMOUNT
$474.68
310.13
4,307.15
100.00
2,039.60
40.00
519.40
1,392.05
9,116.05
103.25
26.20
90.40
866.71
65.28
45.00
5,223.75
3,188.06
587.02
94.50
89.60
224.00
1,173.00
7,236.00
3,590.45
457.92
3,066.47
1,373.07
929.00
156.50
145.25
1,425.57
23.34
192.30
20.00
1,887.08
52.65
195.12
9.00
3,122.03
331.67
6,174.30
CKNO
22416
22417
22418
22419
22420
22421
22422
22423
22424
.
.
AMOUNT
111.20
$56.85
9,252.32
7,174.24
1,103.25
36.80
435.50
3,408.12
3,211.95
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 9, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 28, 1998
TO WHOM ISSUED
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO.
GTE DIRECTORIES
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO.
JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO.
LAKE REGION VENDING
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
PAUSTIS WINE CO.
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
PlJAF03E
MlSC PURCHASES
ADVERTISING
LIQUOFWIINElMISC PURCHASES
L1QUORtWlNEPURCHASES
MISC PURCHASES
FR8GHT
WlNElBEER PURCHASES
LlQUORIWINE PURCHASES
L1QUOFWIINElMISC PURCHASES
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
Page 2
() () (;~ T- (;- ~. ?:
() C) ?< () ~;\ l;~
...,..' .'~'- '" . ~~'.
L ':.,1 "(.;1 /. t~
r. r. ., r. .'-.-,"
I,) '....' '....1 ":::' t,':~
()l.? 1M ()r!.)
i;~ () ~' f.) 6" ~:s
~38 1M I;'()T':' I.?
t., ~:s .' ~:; (:I?:
l.!S ~ ,?t;.o
(;~~ () ., ~. 1:;-
l. 8 ., C)~~.~~
()() .. ()i~
00"T09
- c:5B2
! ;... ~! "! I' -; ". 1 .~, !
f'..i'rt...!CF::.:
r-..! () ~~i !.,!:J f",~ (", ~-j ';;;' T ./ T
~:; ~,..! ~:.) t~.-1 l t:-, -f.;; ?:"1::
NIW(]~ 8IH~S8nS SN()IJ.V~3d d08~l
SNO]'~.I.l3~H08~~ ~W~_.~W~W
:::~ +i' -f;.. ::r .:~'
~ .. ., ..........
d~~S :~!O(:Jd
"l,:;:'1] -! r'.lOSi')HO C' . . . A "l f.::; 0 "/',ltJi-l ~ :J.OH < i"~ T :'-lHf.::; -j ';;;i~i~ 1 Z;
df.::;::) A1T:)
S~H -idclllS dOHS
S1~IlOOdd dV~ ~~~11
T~~'-.' .;'i:--9 ., l
N]AVH9 i A03NN3~ HO~ "lV101 ***
rJ~d)...~j-- rQ~:J:::Jl :]3(1
S .I. TlC'Ddd
d3:::~ ~:IOdd
SNT~d3d-"l~93"l 330
d1~ HS-"l~93"l ~30
"lV93"l "lVd3N39 H38W3330
N3^QH~ ~ Aa3NN3~ ~bvZZ
df.::Jl.0 AJ I~)
.l.i'HVW dInt}::!
-dHO~ H01VTOVd d i C' 1~~11
?:JV9 A.I. T~l
S3T,ddllS dOHS
ANVdW03 S1dVd SNT~dOH T~~lZ
:=)O '-i8 r"ftl-1
SClh!V-i.l. ::-:!j-ll-XV J dOdd d::~HnSt;:::Jd.l. A .!. r.HtO~ H T cF1Hr',13H O~i~;.
d31',1l--1V"ld :'-ldVd dnOd9 d3"l:=)30:~/i'-IO.l.~l1'HSIOH 69i'lf!'
i S W:JVd
d :~n I-IOd
3SH3dX3 d3NOSIdcl ~30 d3dllSV3HJ A1Nno~ NTd3NN3H 89~Zl
(:EFJi'-n ::)i'-13
J.X3J :::J3i'-13cJ3~3H
SS3dd A90"l0l,JH:J3.1. .I.,,/,o,IJ:0 !.~,~i~2:Z
. ...... ... ,..... ~'?"
l.t ~)~~ -~-------
E? i;~ .. 1" () I;?
9NI~3nd J,33l~ ~Nld HOd l~.I.O.i. *~~
!3n~J
"l:::Jll~ 9NT"l311~ 133"l~ VNT~ 99b11
T1"T81 dV9 A1T3
,-. ~. " ~. -~. ..' . .
I....H...I I..).:.:~t') 1,".1
(){S .. f:?t;ll J.. 2:
l. ~~ .. ~i;~
()() .. l. ()ti' 1M i~;'
90 " T'~
i:;(:~K';'1.8"T
86"/T
.7.:9.6';;;
"~NI 9NI"l~A~3d 7-3 ~9~11
NI"l~A33d VH1NO~ 9NT"l3A~3H A"lH.l.NOW
~=JO d3Jt;jvl
3SVH~Hnd d3J.VM H10 H1~
~o AJ.!~-~OrS'3~X3 b9~ZZ
d'::'9 A.I. T~
.lr-.n~!<.1 dTlll")3
O~ AlddOS S.!.H~d 3NI'8N3 99~ZZ
Sh!T
/6/;-':'T'--8 10(.1J1'''03
~O A1T~-N3SSVHNVH~
7,-:.,.}~.A
,."..,~
.LOde!
-lV!~! T i',lV
S.I. ~F!d.l.S
S3ClddllS J33d.l.S
d38Wn"l d31N3dHV~ H-~ T9~11
r"'I-DA~:::jcJ
dll h!l:;:J]"l3 T1V~1
"aNT SldH3~ 9NINMOd8 09~Zl
dt;:':) A.l.I~
.I. f-.ITVi-1 dTl103
S.!,H~d ~~n~.i. H3A08 6ZbZZ
0/ "6'?1 dtm AJ l~ JrHt~i-l dHl03 3otn8 Odf.-}771-1~::j !.Zt~lZ
90,8 NllW S~008 33N3H3~3d 3Hl:;:JMJ~OS
3d01S~008 H]Od08 BZ~ll
09"OT9 i S~dVd "lV1N3H 13"l101 3"l8l:;:J1dOd "~NT <S~~I8 91~11
00"~9T S13:::JrOHd AHd38MVHJS-NOI.l.~.I."lIlSNO~ 9NTd33NT9N3 NV~ld3WV ~1~11
___________ ________._ ___________________._____ ________________________M__ ____.____
1NllOWV "1d30 NOT.l.dTd3S3Q 3WVN dOON]A ff~~]H~
91W "l13NllO~ 866T 66 "83~
HO~ .lST"l "lVAOHddV ~~3H~
OOOM3dOHS ~O A1I~
'f ~.' "'" '::; ,'.
(),~~. .
()t.: " Z:()Z
9T"T11
.... r, .. ...."......,...._..,_.
'....I'..} !. ,.,:.. 'z. t
! :~ ,':c <:::.> :"'.1 ' ,,-"
::) f...,! I .1. ~~.! C'i ~~.~ f....! C) ::) ~'.'J ~:\ .!. 1",.j
;~.~ S~
/.c!~': ,!
':.,
.!. /\ C) ~:) r...,! ~~~ ~:)
~~~.~~~:i .i. (If'.,J T !.".! ~:)r",.! T .1, ~j~::Jt,.l
--I T ::) h! I'i D:J
..--:-, , '.'~'"
.J'i ...! t'. ~.).....
'..' ....f . ... '.d
~~'I-' . .~' ,
:::1 ~"'! 1 .!
..,- ..-~, .~:.' '~.'
L ../ '(?.;':~ (,
..., ':"J :~:,
:::!.I. ,1 ~:;.
::.~ ::HJ
?~ tj~:J )\ ,I. T~]
TJI'H
t; :] T ~~5 ~~ r...! t::J ~~i ? c:~ () ~:;
.-, ......' ~.,.'.....
l~} '...... '(,;.0 :.:':~ ,;':..
~:,l T ~';~ t:.o i;' ~ T
.!.~:~~s 8nc1~~.i.W ~~ OS HO~~ ~~J,OJ. ~%*
d J~l I -IDe!
ci ~~~j r -'j()c!
~!:~ :::! ~:) t....! r 'j{ () C) fl :~) ~i (]
.1. C) .i. ~1:_t!'-iO:') ?:I.1. D i'~1.i.,t~ cJ?i(] /\ J :~l :::!~)S t1! 10 tJ)-i.!.l....! '>{"'~i C)~; (:;:;."t;.ol?:
00"09! d3S ^lINnWWO~ dDINJS dO~ 'lVI01 ***
oo..oo~ X S~H~d HOSIAd3dns ~NrN ~N~r
,... r. ... ,...._-,..
'".1',) I,}'Z. ~.::..
t:.oti' .. (;,S:i;?
t.,l ... ()T?:
'l0IdOlINVC' ^d~nNVC' S33IAd3S ^lINnWWO~ dOIH3S 8Sb11
9cn8 t...!n!-.l
)~I ~;:~c!~:;c1
I~JN3d HIM IdV~HJV~
~NI "Sd3J'l3HS 3JI~'l3JVS !S~ll
~(JI8 h!ilt...l
~V1N3d dJ.l.3W 39V.l.SDe!
"~HI S3M08-A3NLId 9S~11
Z~H9l0~!T /NO~3AVW~N3l3H~S~HHO dO~ ~~.i.Oj, ***
.
() l ... zt;r'Z:- _._~~..~...........~.._.~~. f.,~(:;Ji\c~'~"~:Jf",!? ...J :71'...!
C.l.? ~ t;()T
l t} .. 8;;8 to /.
()1"; ... l?() l
09"16/"2:
CICf" C)l;?T
';;9 "';t~T. C;
Zt., .. t;lS'9
96" 8t~
O/"TS
()l. "1'1;
()() ... -;t;r';
()9 ,k ";9() fO T
'>iHT-! D~;.---Di"!~7] 3:::iO
-------- Od8 ONV~SI AO~HS-9N3 ~30
OH08 ~J~ dS-9H3 ~30
m,!:::! IVd3i'.13~1 :J 3tJ
3Cl d3i./I:::JS
'3 (1 (:f3 .I. l:::? {....,
~:)f.,.!? ~~j:::Jtv!?S :) ~:!(J
~)H3 ~3.!. ::;;:lII/! 330"-I'..Oh! 30SS:V:/r.-1Dd3AVI--!. H:.:J'l3!"LlS · ddO ';'::;1/11
~t(J (:i:::! .I.l:j{.,'t
HI~d38 ~13M N3^~~~aOOM dns S~~OM ~3.1.~M N~:~H.l.HON ~~bZZ
r.!T -n A T=J;>:J
f; ~:l ti 8 ~:l r..! I -,:) )c., :) ::; (:5
SW3.l.SAS 3snd3H .1.S3MOTW 9q~ZZ
()t7 .. I;; () T
3n~~^ 3nd.!. 3HN~^~N HOd '~.lOj. **~
cjtJ~:) A..L T ~J
J r,l I f.:~!_..! d T nn::::
.Lh!1f.::!!-! dInO]
3nlVA 3ndJ 3dd~^VN lS~ll
? (] ?:1 ::1 tV! ~~ ~;
:::!l-.r=J~lf.:r'!d3d df.;:;d dI~ dJ] dS
"3NT.^11~rln nV30VH
l-.C'h'.A
,.;i.,2:W
T )~. i./IO hi ~:;
ONVS o,~NI "SNOS ~ d3113nw "WM OS~ll
~l Cl --j H h! f! !-..!
OJSV93NNIW dO~ 'lVJOl ***
~:;JIJI-iI.l.n
~;3IJT--iIJn
~:;3T J l-iT.!.n
S3TJI-!TJn
s::n JIlT In
S3l.l.I'lI HI
S:::il.l. I'lT In
S3I J 1'11 In
S::iT J T--iI Jil
O~S~83NNIW 6~~ZZ
t'9o,T~l.T
C,9"6TT donnII
98"lOT dDnOI'l
t;.ol~ ., ()~1Z;
i~l " i~TT
99 " t,TC,
()8" 69T
;-8 .. C;'/. T
09" T'::;T
t:.o:;::-"'/.?T
>x S).{c!~?d
~f.::!:0 AJ 13
3C1 d3 J ,:;{.,',
dDnnI--i
3C1 ?:J3Jf.-ji.,'!
:::iCl d3Jl.::!M
-~-----------------_.~---_._.
f,!D I J d T ~:)S::Hl
~:i i....! ~:; h! (:5 C) (J r~J ~:! l\
:fr '>{:) :'~I H:::1
J r.JnC)!...jtJ .. .I. cl3Cl
91W 'lI3Nn03 866T "6 "83d
dO~ .i.SIl ~~AOddd~ ~~3H~
OOOM3dOHS ~O AJ.I~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CHECK APPROVAL L.IS'!' F:OR
FEB~ 9~ 1998 COUNCIL M'fG
C~iECKW VENDOR NAME DESCR.IP'!"ION DEP'[w AMOUN't'
-.-.------ -.------------------------------ ----------.-------.-------- -------- -----------
**~
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
S4~399wl4
~~.
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
139~652.92
.
.
9 <}~t1d
.. j ~: ........... ,.-. ~ -': I ,.......' .
1~}f....1 L :::..i..!Ci:,:,:!'...! ..'.. '::..:::J...) .l.t.!!....!
()CI - S).i:1 ?~{:J ! k;j it i~l r.} l.,.J
"(/S: ." T?:-~'~?.. S .~...{ J 7:"1f-i::.. d::: J ndl.l0~l
';7 Z .. i;? l. SI () l '?ZTZ 3,H3iy! .. t~ Hcr"p:;J(:.J ()>;-l-t7 86 ';() .,' 1.10 :]
,..
()() .. ZS'T 699Z1Z i-oJ T.A.?:1tJJ ~- ::;;:]:) 383d <; I.. <;t> 86 I;:-() >:... ;.10:]
9l. "I~ZT 8'?9ZT2: .!. cH::liy! :3 .I. S - r' o T l...t.O 0It,t, 86 i~() (~.. ;-10:]
8S - t,OI I.. 99Z1Z H.l. H-1S -I ::;;Clh!3dEJ C.()Zt7 Sf) ~() , ;-10:]
,..
9Z-1Tl 999ZTZ dcmi'-!H:]S - r C1d1.:?Nd3B OSOv ,",,' i?() (:".. l.W:]
~b
ZO " S'i, CQQ7T- Cl Il-1H:]S (WdNO:] d 016~ 86 ~O (., 1-10:]
.. . . ,.. ..(..
i,8 '9~v t;o99ZTZ: (IT i-1H:JS -3 Ci3HdO.l.STdH:] ,....... ..".- 86 ~CI Z 1-10 :]
UUt);:.
t7r. " t;oQ 1:?99Z:TZ r.17W?:i:3 r H:JS - i-l 7Ar.17J 0C;8~ 86 0;;:0 .::.. 1-10:]
1'~ "()~T Z99Z1Z H3AI.:?S "3 i'-IHO r S'Z8~ 86 9() (., 'hi 0:]
..,.. . "86Z T99ZTZ HJ7i'13;J::lm:l - r j31.:?HJ II-l S'18~ 86 9.0 Z WO:]
<.. I.
~9 "O';TT ()99ZTZ ){3:"JOtl " r N711.:? 008~ 86 ~O Z 1-10:]
9t) . Zt'Z 6S'9ZTZ Stl3~O?:l " r ClII.:?NOO OT I: ~ 86 ~O Z 1.J 0 :]
6'; - 8()01 8';9ZTZ III.:?ClNt.Ci " r 13 T ;..J1dCl ()()9~ 86 'Z() ~ I-l0:J
..'
1'Z" 6Z~ l~9ZTZ 3CJCl7d ":] iVI3H J. Jl::;I.J ,... .-.:;~ S€.") 9() (~". i-l 0 ~')
~(:). "::.
~S'"968 9~9ZtZ d30NilOd -r d3HdO.!.SldH:] ()8S'~ 86 9.0 (.'. l.10:] .
1..1.. -9TTl rr.c---- :>iI.:?ONI.:?Zl.:?d "3 Hd3S0 [. ()C)S.~ 8c".) I~() - 1-10:]
~ ':1 ;1'(.. Lof.i .:.':..
()6 " i,06 t"~9ZTZ N3S,3TN " r A3,Ol.:?d8 OOt,~ 86 ~O Z 1--.10:]
t,~ " IS'Tl ~~9ZTZ: I--.lil:]:] TN -<;i 3:]r~3div't::;;' ()r)T'~ 86 ~O .:.':.. i-l 0 :]
zz .. '~'~9 Z';9ZTZ 81.:?I.:?N ", I.:?S3d3HJ () () 0 s:- 86 ~CI (. 1-10:]
q~"r::' 1S'9ZTZ o I I.:? r-l0Cl:} I..! "r 13 Ii,! I.:? 0 8~6Z 86 $.:'() Z 1..10:]
.':> ...b
S'~"Z9. ()S'9Z1Z NO?:lHI.:?j,.j "H T13SSild ()()f.,G 86, I~CI t.~, l.JO:J
Z S' - t'i"9. 61'9Z12: ONnl "d r-l0s::;;r. ;'08Z 86 ~.I..) l.. 1-10:]
9'9 " t"Jt"Jt:> 8i,9Z1Z T )'!Siv'Im:ln 1 -d Hd3S0 [' 008Z 86 ~O 7' l.JO:]
,..
8t> " 6~9 I.. t,9ZTZ Cl3N?:I3.!..I.71 "W NI.:?SilS .()().;'z 86 ~() Z 1--.10:]
S'l " '~q 9i>9Z1Z NOSHd3S0r " ::l W7Tllriv'1 001Z 86, ~O Z 1.10:]
t)(... .
i, I "~I.. S't'9ZTZ S3r-lOr "I NT J. HI.:?I.J 0S'6,1 86 ~O z: l-lO:]
S'T"~l..l t,t,9Z1Z NOSf-.lHOr "H ,ill.:?d Oi,81 86 ~O Z 1-10:]
OT"100T ~t'9Z1Z NOSr-lHO r " CJ STNN30 0081 86 ~O z; !.10:]
':;8"9.9.01 Zt.,9ZTZ N3SN3r "::;; A:3{:J::l::f3r OOll 86 9.() <:.. 1-10:]
l'j~ "Z9Z Tt='9ZTZ :]T:]T,3r SOHn <;l91 8t) ~O (::.. !.JO:]
.:;t, " <;i,1 01,9Z1"'Z 13>17r "0 f-.JI.:? T dB 109T 86 ~() Z 1-10:] .
ZS - Z~T (:)j~9ZTZ S3/-..T .I.J AOdJ S'I..Sl 86 'i:'() r::.. 1-10:}
Ti, " lT81 89.9Z12: !-!?::IilH "::) S3!..!tW 0S'S'1 86 9.() ...~, 1--.10:]
61-11..1 1..';~9Z1Z S3~J.r-J3H " I...! A ,-13>1 C'9.i,1 86 ~C' .:.~, !-10:]
9t, " <;9.S' 99.9Z1Z 9r-!T T13H - r I.:? ,3 !-It; d 01t"l 86 5:'() Z 1-10:]
19" 9.Z';' SS9Z1Z N3S3~j3H -?:l ::;;T:]Td.l.l.:?d OOt, T 86 ~() - 1-10:]
.::.
I;()" 6l. 9 i'~9ZTZ .I. ?::I 383H "'d i'>l33,H.l.7>1 06Tl 86 .-..,... (:, 1-10:]
';~. I....'
t,O - T~S' ~9.9Z1Z .LilOH9 l.'j l:;j-iT,"l!.!. 0911 86 ~() (,..~ l..lO:]
'. ,. """0 Z0;;:9Z1Z r.1Ht' ?::I 9 ", Al.ll;;; S't,IT 86 9() ~~, l,.IO:]
Vo ,....
Oo;~06 1~9ZTZ 3 i'-l 9 I.:? 9 ", .i.C!380d ()S'01 8!:) 9() (., I-!Q :]
81" ()~1 CI~~9ZTZ SC!13T:::l "CJ 137H:] T I.J 018 86 ~(j Z 1.10:)
96" i,l1.. 6Z;9ZTZ: S;~! i ){~3 " ~ S31-17[' ~.l. l. 86 I~() (., 1-10:]
...1
8f. -~1..8 8Z9ZTZ S r .A.::;;O -S S3,dI.:?H:] CI()-;. 86; l;:-() <:.. l-10:]
9S'-S'lZ l. Z9ZTZ; 3,0:] "W ::;;,39;...jl.:? ~_.r:: 86 ~() Z l.J 0 :]
':> (.._.
9,( "IZS'1 9Z9ZTZ r-llVtOd8 3:]r-.13CJM7' ';TT 86 ~~. -. 1-10::)
'V ';:. I..} f.':,
8S'"TZZ SZ9Z1Z dA.LSI.:?8 - 0 :3 T r.1HO:] 011 86 ~C' Z l.10:]
1S'"9T t"Z9ZTZ ?::IA.!.SI.:?8 ~J A IT!.!3 60T Q' l;:-() Z l.jO:]
,..0
.I.;...lnO!-Il;;; {:!381../nN d38!-lnf-.l 3.!1.:?(J :3dA.I.
')O!:]3H:] )'!:]3H:] 31-17;"'1 ?3AO-idl-l;1 :>i:] 3H:] :-n 3 l-Ll
C.! '3 J S T 9 "3 ?:l .....-.: :] ;I H :]