041497 CC Reg AgP
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1997
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
~
,~
The City Council will convene in Executive Session following the regular portioo of tbemeetingto
discuss litigation matters with the City Attorney. No action will be taken during this mc;etinI....
AGENDA
1 . CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
Mayor Dahlberg
Stover
McCarty _
O'Neil1_
Gar.tbn1tel
B. Review Agenda
2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 24, 1997 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B . City Council Special Meeting Minutes March 31, 1997 (Att.-#2B Minutes)
C. City Council Executive Session Minutes March 31, 1997 (Att.-#2C Minutes)
3 . CONSENT AGENDA. Motion to approve items on Consent Agenda & Adopt
Resolutions Therein:
A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Amending the Joint and Cooperative Agreement -
Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution)
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Pennit for Aeee$$ory
Space in Excess of 1,200 Square Feet (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution)
Applicant: Mary Reutiman
Location: S965 Eureka Road
C. A Motion to Approve a Commercial Sign Permit (Att.-#3C Planner's
Memorandum)
Applicant: Leroy Signs on behalf of Driskill's New Market
Location: 23740 State Highway 7 (Shorewood Shopping Center)
D. A Motion Autb.orizing ~ Mayor and City Administrator to Enter into a ConJract
with McCombs, Frank Roos & Assoc. to Perform Engineering Consulting Work
Regarding Stonnwater Management Near the Ron Johnson Property and
Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds up to $3.soo (Att.-#3D Engineer's
Memorandum)
E. A Motion Establishing the Second Regular Council Meeting in May as May 27
F. A Motion to Approve an Agreement with Lake RestOration, Inc. for the 1997
Inspection of Eurasian Wattr Milfoil - Christmas Lake (Att.-#3F Proposed
Agreement)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . APRIL 14, 1997
PAGE 2 OF 2
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (No Council action will be taken.)
5 . PARKS . Report by Representative
A. Report on March 25,1997 Park Commission Meeting (Att.-#5A Park ~
Draft Minutes) .
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Proposals for a ConcessiOllTrai1er
in Freeman Park and Awarding the Contract (Att.-#5B Proposed Resolution)
C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the .1997 Parks Capitaf Improvement
Budget (Att.-#5C Proposed Resolution)
D. Request for Clarification of Council's Expecta.tioi1s of Park Commission's Role .
with Regard to Snowmobile Issues
6 . PLANNING . Report by Representative
A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding an Appeal Interpretation of City CodoRelated
to Non-conforming Docks (Att.-#6 Proposed Resolutions)
Applicant: James Cabalka
Location: 58XX Christmas Lake Road
7. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION' AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPHY FOR THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Att.-
#7 Engineer's Memorandum) .
8. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
A.
Establish Open Forum Meeting Topics for Next Month
#
Staff Report on Development Monitoring
9. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
B. Report on Mayor's Meeting Held April 10, 1997
C. Review and Establish Topics for Work Sessions
10. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF
CLAIMS (Att.-#lO)
C
-' ~
0;:
t
ft.
.
..
t
L
.
~.
Meeting Notice
The Mayor of the City of Shorewood .
is sponsoring a meeting of area Mayors
Thursday, April 10, 1997
6:00 p.m.
In the Council Chambers
of the Shorewood City Hall
5755 Country Club Road
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss storm water management in the Southlake
Minnetonka area.
AGENDA
6:00 p.m.
1.
Introduction of Attendees
6:05 p.m. - II. Presentation
A. New Legislative Mandates Regarding Stormwater
Management
. Discussion of New Laws Which Impact Municipalities
. Timelines
B . Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Requirements
. Stormwater Management Plans
6:20 p.m.
6:50 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
C . Cooperative Efforts by All lVlunicipalities
. Advantages of Cooperative EffortS
. Regional Boundaries Versus Corporate Boundaries
. Aerial Photography and Associated Costs
III. Discussion
IV. Other Issues of Concern
V . Adjourn
A majority of the Shorewood City Council may be present at this meeting, however, no
action will be taken. Appetizers will be available.
Mandates Regarding Stormwater Management
. "Local water resources management plans shall be adopted within two years of the
approval of the (Watershed) District's plan. Local plans shall be developed as required
by the rules and policies promulgated by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. "
Ref: Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410
. For a majority of the Lake Minnetonka Area Communities, the primaty Watershed
District is the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD).
. MCWD's Plan is currently up for adoption by the Board of Water and Soil Resources
Committee.
. It is estimated that it will take each community approximately 12 to 14 months to prepare
a plan and gain approval by the Watershed Districts
. Several communities have requested that a public hearing be conducted for MCWD' s
plan before adoption.
. This Public Hearing is scheduled for Wednesday night April 16, 7:00 PM at the
Minnetonka City Hall.
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's Requirements
. A developer of land for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional or public
roadway uses shall submit a stormwater management plan and erosion control plan
which meets the District's requirements.
Ref. MCWD Rule B, Subpart 2 "Regulation"
. Wet detention basins shall be required on site and designed in accordance with the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency design recommendations (NURP standards)
Ref. MCWD Rule B, Subpart 3c.
. This mandates that any reconstruction efforts of local roadways will require a
stormwater detention basin designed to NURP Standards.
. Rule B does allow an alternative to an on site pond if an agreement has been executed
with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for an alternative regional detention
facility.
Cooperative Efforts by All Municipalities
Advantages of Cooperation by all Lake Area Communities
· Cooperation in sharing of information or data regarding drainage issues.
· Strength in numbers regarding the Watershed District requirements.
Regional Boundaries Versus Corporate Boundaries
· Drainage Boundaries do not coincide with Corporate Boundaries.
· In some cases a municipality may be able to coordinate a regional pond to satisfy Rule B
which falls outside the City's borders.
Aerial Topography and Associated Costs
. The City of Shorewood is investigating costs associated with aerial topography.
. Currently costs are approximately $ 37,000 including photo control, flight, and mapping.
· Other communities can be included for an incremental cost.
· Costs of each community will vary according to the number of communities and
alignment of flight paths.
· Shorewood is also seeking alternatives to aerial flight topography.
----
,.
Joel Hentges
"A Top Sales Leader"
(612) 473-9500
4/13/97
Re: 5945 Christmas Lake Road
Harvey,
After viewing your property on Christmas
Lake it is my opinmon that your buildings have
little or no value (except the garage).
Whoever were to buy your property would
most likely tear the house down and remove
it at cost of approximately $25,000.
C1t r41ards,
JO,m.tges
=---
=
counselor
realty inc.
3622 Highway 101 S.
Wayzata, MN 55391
,
Stuart L./Gail M. Finney
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood, MN 55331
1~~~~~\\Jl~~\
~y AP~ 16 mj
April 14, 1997
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
BY FAX TO: 474-0128
Re: Stuart L./Gail M. Finney
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood, MN 55331
Property I.D. No. 36-117-23-13-0026
1997 Estimated Market Value
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I believe it is important not only to notify you of my
disagreement with the valuation of my property, but also about my
displeasure with the process.
By letter dated April 1, 1997, I advised that I disagreed with the
January 1, 1997 valuation of my residence. In response, on April
3, 1997 I received a letter from the City of Shorewood advising
that the City Assessor had been instructed to review the appraisal
and that I would be contacted.
On April 4, 1997, my wife received a telephone call from a woman
who identified herself as being with the City Assessor's Office
and asked to speak to me about visiting my home as part of the
review process. My wife called the Assessor's Office on April 8,
1997 to schedule the requested appointment and was told by the
woman she had previously spoken to that an appointment was not
necessary as the appraiser was familiar with the property. On
April 10, 1997, I received the attached letter advising that no
change would be made and that the hearing on this decision was
April 14, 1997.
The communication from the City states that the matter is to be
reviewed. I would like to know how the matter was reviewed
without speaking to me or my wife and without viewing the
property. Either the procedure is awed or the Assessor believes
he does not have to follow the ins uctions of the City. An
explanation of what occurred woul apprec' ted.
Attachment
..
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net
36-117-23-13-0026
Stuart & Gail Finney
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood, MN. 55331
25
April 9, 1997
Dear Local Bvard AtLelluee:
At the direction of the Shorewood Local Board of Review we have reviewed your property
records.
It is our opinion that the estimated property value as of January 2, 1997 is $ Cbrrect as Appraised
This value has been recommended to the Local Board of Review. Our recommendations will be
voted on when the Board reconvenes on Monday, April 14, 1997 at 7:00 PM. If you agree with
this value, you do not need to attend the meeting.
If you disagree with the assessor's recommendation and the Local Board's decision you may
appeal to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization. Directions for further appeal are given on
your 1997 valuation notice.
If you have any questions please call 473-1844.
SinCt:id~,., C '
~# !1Acb----
Rolf Enckson
City Assessor
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
Minnetonka Office
19400 Highway 7
Excelsior, MN 55331
612/474-2525
Fax 612/474-9583
April 13, 1996
Mr. and Mrs. Harvey C. Strohm Jr.
5945 Christmas Lake Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Strohm,
You have asked me for the Fair Market Value of the structures on your homestead at
5945 Christmas Lake Road.
It is my opinion that any potential purchaser of your property will demolish the residence
as well as the rental property. The cost of demolition should be subtracted from the land
value in determining the Fair Market Value. The garage mayor may not have some
value depending on the design of the home to be built on the property. The narrowness
of the lot may dictate a design that will not be able to incorporate the use of the garage.
My opinion is that the garage would most likely not be used as part of new construction
on the property.
Please call me with any questions you may have on your property or any other property
on Christmas Lake. As you know I have lived on Christmas Lake for many years and
have represented the large majority of the buyers and sellers on the lake in the purchase
and/or sale of their property.
Sincerely,
Carl Zinn,
Certified Residential Broker
REALTOR
rHG)
4-14-1997 ~:32PM
FROM FULLER AND FINNEY 612 835 2984
P.2
Stuart L./Gail M. Finney
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood. MN 55331
April 14. 1997
Ci~y of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood. MN 55331
BY FAX TO: 474-0128
Re: Stuart L./Gail M. Finney
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood. MN 55331
Property I.D. No. 36-117-23-13-0026
1997 Es~imated Market Value
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I bel1eve it is important not only to nO~1fy you of my
disagreement with the valuation of my property. but also about my
displeasure with the process.
By letter dated April 1. 1997. I advised that I disagreed with the
January 1. 1997 valuat10n of my residence. In response. on April
3. 1997 I received a letter from the City of Shorewood advising
that ~he Ci~y Assessor had been instructed to review the appraisal
and that I would be contacted.
On April 4. 1997. my wife received a telephone call from a woman
who identified herself as being with the Ci~y ASSessor's Office
and asked to speak to me about visiting my home as part of the
review process. My wife called the Assessor'S Office on April 8.
1997 to schedule the requested appointment and was told by the
woman she had previously spoken to that an appointment was not
necessary as the appraiser was familiar with 'the property. On
April 10. 1997, I received the attached letter advising that no
change would be made and that the hearing on this decision was
April 14. 1997.
The communication from the City states that the matter is to be
reviewed. I would like to know how the matter was reviewed
without speaking to me or my wife and without viewing the
property. Either the procedure is awed or the ASSeSsor believes
he does not have to follow the ins uctions of the Ci~y. An
explanation of what occurred woul apprec' ~ed.
Attachment
4-14-1997 ~:33PM
FROM FULLER AND FINNEY 612 835 2984
P.3
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
COUNCIL
Krlstl Stover
Jennifer McCany
. Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWQOD. MINNESOTA 55331.S927 . (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.net/shorewood. Cityhall@ShOrawood.state.net
36-117-23-13-0026
Stuart & Gail Finney ,
19710 Chartwell Hill
Shorewood, MN. 55331
.25
April 9, 1997
Dear Local Bvard AU.euJ~:
At the direction of the Shorewood Local Board of Review we have reviewed your property
records." .
It is our opinion that the estimated property value as of January 2, 1997 is $ O:>rrect as Appraised
This value has been recommended to the Local Board of Review, Our recommendations will be
voted on when the Board reconvenes on Monday, April 14, 1997 at 7:00 PM. If you agree with
this value, you do not need to attend the meeting,
A Residential Community on Lake MlnnelOflka's South Sho~
If you disagree with the assessor's recommendation and the Local Board's decision you may
appeal to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization. Directions for further appeal are given on
your 1997 valuation notice.
If you have any questions please calI473-1844.
Sincc!'.;1y, C
~# 141(& ~
Rolf ;tkson
City Assessor
--.. - ...., .'- -.---.,...-----.--- ..,.---,----...--~.-.-..-----.----.--.
. 1 \I~! ~f0Ire~\\nrc~1
(21.) I~D ~~~~-o=~1
20-11'1--2.3- 14-00.04, I
. . 1 ~_ _ . tY\ ro., 1'1).1_.____
_____ _.___ ._._._.. _ ...... _. .._ ..___. . .........__.... ...... . .-____..._......_.__. .. .............---........----.....---f ..
ct~ ]~~ ~: . _ .. .__
....~..-~...~i.:-i~t9~~~L-
-..--..-....--. .'.---.' ...........__._...~_._--_....._--~--~_..-"~_._..._...__._.,.-.,.'--"--
~ Jl. ~ ~~~-~~
__._____.n_...._ ..-.... ... .. ...... ---~ -....- ----.-._-~:::~.:;:....-~..::-:-.. .---"--"-If-='.ir~-tJ--
~ ~ ~ ~ 'f11I-. ~ --t"'~--<4 ~--
..~.....~.--~.~....~~.l~J~~~---.-. ._
---~.~-'7~..~.---.-..--.~...-..
---~~-~~i~-.-
____.-~. _~ .l:....__.___..---..-- ..... ..---- --..-.....----......----.----..-
__~..~-~_:d_-~.~-L--.--
.~.~......_.........~.~..~_.-~.~._-_~~;J..~.7~.-.....~-=-_-
-...~-z~;:-~;2:~~==-..
. --. "-~.?".' ...-- -....... ---------------
...--.--.,............-. '-"...-. ----...--.-+-,,--".----.--'y--.--...-- -
t. L~kd.
~oq,,~ fON5t 0....
fK(..~ \~ ll>.,. ""-,,, ~5 3 ~ ,
LOC4-\ 13c.~~J o{ r\e\)\'€..-w
c~tJ 04' S\...orewooJ
S,., 5S COl.L,,+rl CI\..\...6 ~ OCLJ
S h()re.w~A. tvl,'V\h. .6S33 I
~~ -'-'-
--
~~----...,---
-
1.'.1..1.'..."... n.. utl..U.I lullu:JIU::I:l.hmM.lhnl.1uhlul1111
Charles J. & Kathryn G. Fox
5660 Vine Hill Road
Shorewood,~ 55331
lij~~~n~~~
!\I'll APR 11997 ~
\ By
ii
'f
I!
'I
,
'I
il
I
.'1.....
i ~
I
I
'i
'f
, '
ADDRESS
1997 PROPOSED INCREASE
1997 MARKET VALUE
March 30, 1997
City Assessor
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, ~ 55331
To Whom It May Concern:
I wish to appeal the proposed market value increase of $2000 in 1997 for property
ID# 36-117-23 14 0059. I am also requesting that the market value of the property be
decreased from the proposed $192,000 to $186,000 which will bring it into parity with
other homes on Vine Hill Road.
During 1988 and 1989 Rottlund Homes built three homes on Vine Hill Road that were based on the
same floor plan with some minor modifications. The addresses of those homes is 5620, 5640, and 5660
Vine Hill Road; the later of which I own. Today Shorewood has assessed these homes as follows:
5620
$ 3,000
$ 176,000
5640
$ 1,000
$ 186,000
5660
$ 2,000
$ 192,000
Clearly, one can see that my property at 5660 is over valued in comparison to the others since the floor
plan/square footage is roughly the same for all the properties, and my lot was the smallest and least
expensive.
Therefore I am requesting that the estimated market value for my home be reduced to $186,000
for 1997.
~
Charles 1. Fox
Wk Ph# 591-2400
Hm Ph# 474-5082
-", -. ..
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Hennepin
City of Shorewood
We, the undersigned, Board of Review - *Equalization - of the
He 211 (p.l)
City
of
Shorewood
In said County, do hereby
~ade chang1 in the 19~Assessment as e~e~i:~e following form(s).
r; ~ )L./"l ( Chair) ft j., %X'
, k~ A- A-;-i..u) It) i/'//'~h;/f
CHANGES MAD~BY THE LOCAL BOARD 1;; ~~w 1/ / *Applies only to Cities whose Charters provide for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review.
Jo~,^ {~'Ar>A P.S-1/7-23-23-0002 Y RZ X ,t:;gSoo ~'o 000 95'000 ''=-5 000.
Te:v-~/l IA ,. L) tile IIIIA II v I1S-l/ 7- 2 3 -] L/ - 00 2.0 Y R x No C. \.t a.. '" c t=1_
1v'11.1"" e \ M n It' \too l.L/ iJ.S-i/7- 2 3-lf 3- Do3b V IRz )( At 0 C ~ "- \\.~ e...
E4.....\ \111..). 2b-1I7-l.3-/I./-boo'i Y R X No C~G\l.\~e.
e~lC, tJ~b,^,<;~c.~ 31-1f7-l~-J'l-0031 VR x' No ~~a.V1~e
J 0 ~UV\hl ~4. l,. ~ 3\ -H7-13-2.cf- 001 D V I<l X 17 000 .~\2. D() 0 22.0000 ~2~oo
W, tl i A"'" lA ~ ~ k ~ ~ l-H7- 2.3-3~- 000 \ 'y R L X AI 0 t '^ a,V\ ~ c:>-
D 0 ~\A G~\r.cuV\ k. e 1 11-1l1-l3-J J- C>02.Z-Y R i X 1'1 6 c,~ a ""~ e..
J"-"",eli S,^-I/ou:'_ 33-(/7.23-)2,-00,"1 Y If? K AJn Ie.i-.a'l~e
~\--e~ ...', c..~ (~--- --\- l~~-117-"Z3-12 - 0072. Y R.2 iX' N 0 C~ G.""~ e..
Wc\\(&ice f>, V--OV6"'- l33.il7-2.3-2.J- 0030 Y R !)( No C,^ Q.~c.t<=>_
Q,e~c..\J 0:" e.~ l'l 33-\l7-l3-l1.-oao7 Y R X No c.,"'a.IIl~'#-
Y v
Kelly \('c-u.u~5 31.117-2.3-22.-boft.f DB X I2..Qoc J2'}ooo l./2.1oo '$bgon
:\)11";'\ d O\-\a.V\ TfT 33-H7-2.3-2'l..-OOl'1 Y R >< N,., c.~~~C\ce..
L'1kj<~\J Aa.~G""~ 33-\11- Z'l-2.'l..-OOJ7 Y R X td~ c.~c:i.~';:o.
;= d t....~( no\er :S~ 3~-lt7-l.:3-23-DOS~'V R \( A f") f."'4~'i~
~ ".. \.... 1.1 it. I V K. :n-1/7- 2. 14 2: 00-:1." Y l. I'K A I 0 G.L. ... ,,'5 e.
'C.,eo ('. 'fA.c --' A 3:\-\\1-11-41-DO\l... Y Q.. IX oN 0 a~4"'c;~
'oJ
certify that we, and each of us, attended at the office of the City Clerk on the Second day
of Apri 1 , 19--.2L. The day set forth in the notice given by the Clerk, and in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota statutes, Section 274.01.
Qif OJA1'K .19_
-0 4(J
Witness our hands this
CHANGES MADE BY THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
He 211 (p.2)
*Applies only to Cities whose Charters provide for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board.of Review,
C, \' ,.. AG\ X A. 1M. ~ _~
Le sr\V,. p~ \ + 'Z-
~C\.~\,. ~Cl \ V '^^
De.~",'~ 'f;. \='\1- ~ < t L
Q. 1+ Bv.-oakS
f)f}~,...+~ il L Cc. fA e-
rr I fA1 I (1_ u l ()
\ta.\r-V e,V ~\l, ~f ~
~tv C\ \to-+ tp., ,^IA P_V
e,.~A\I- \ e Sr-I" I
lj V\ ~ "- \'1 \-t~
/ViI") {,.u ~/A.{r~ A Se.t-\
I
l~".JJ7-2J -21. OO'2..Cf Y R.L
8<1-1l7- ~3-3r -003Q Y R
34-H7- 2 3<~1-D031 Y ~
3~-t( 7- 2. 3-3'-1- 00 10 Y R
I~Lf-t(1-Z3-'fl- 00/9 Y R.
35'- H1" 2 3 -\ 'I" booCf Y RL
35-l17-2~33-0037 Y R.
3S-\l7 - 2J-Lf2= 00 l1 'I t.. L
~'--lIr l).13-DO~ y ~
3(:,-H7- 23-1'1 - 0059 Y ~
l~~-tll-"l.~-2.<(-OO'3 Y (l
L~C;\l7~2J-t/1--001..0 Y ~
:D~V( J L\++\e~e\d S3-ll7-23-12- 602..3 'I ~
~\ '" ~ n S\M" +~ 33-117-11x",- 0005 'i R
Alliil\c.u o.eo~~e- 33-111-~5-1.c.(-OO\~ "I R..
Met"',., ~((-e.~ r1 c)./",if Pla.fzev 3~~117 - Z 3-12 -nt11, y ~
I
x
')C
kJ
X
X-
x:
y:
><
)0
}<J
)(')
X
Mo e~~"'~e
7700 I2..S30() L/"S-oo 8/;00
'fOOD J7'oO 0 59500 IIc,,5"oo
~ 0 ~ .thA."',a
A 0 ~t" ctv\~ e..
,M (;) f?L ~ lI\. ~ p
N () ,,~Lt a.c..t ~ ~
10$'00 3L{S5*DO .2 SS 000 9o~oo
No t~IA.,^Cl"'"
Jj 0 ~ ~ Ci.Y\~ e.
1\f 0 e.k 0. V\v~ e-
J.'fOOo 447000 1~\Soo '3JSS~tJ
'f
!X'
X-
X
A 0 C/~ a.. II\, c, @
t\J () C,iA a. "t ~ .., ~
N 0 (!,~ ~'1 ~~
tJ D t"" 4 \A~~
V
.;',.
BOARD OF REVIEW
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
MONDA Y, APRIL 14, 1997
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1 . RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
Mayor Dahlberg_
Stover _
McCarty _
O'Neill_
Garfunkel_
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A Motion to Approve the Board of Review Meeting Minutes of April 2, 1997 (Att.-
#2 Minutes)
3. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION REGARDING CITY
ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS (Att.-#2 Assessor's Report)
4. ADJOURN TO REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
BOARD OF REVIEW
WEDNESDA Y, APRIL 2, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
1.
MINUTES
CONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
DRAFT
Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, McCarty, O'Neill and Garfunkel;
B.
Review Agenda
The agenda was approved as presented for April 2, 1997.
2.
PRESENTA TION BY CITY ASSESSOR
Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, explained his company performs the assessing functions for a
number of different cities. He explained the work of the city assessor is guided by state law. Mr.
Erickson explained the job of the city assessor is to value each property every year at market value
and to correctly classify the property.
Mr. Erickson stated in the City of Shorewood, the overall property increase was approximately 5
percent. He noted the market values in the eastern portion of the city did. not increase as much as
the values in the western portion of the city. The sales in the western portion of the city were much
higher in relation to the values appropriated to them in the previous year. The eastern portion of
the city showed increases of 2 to 3 percent with some neighborhoods not reflecting any increase.
Mr. Erickson explained any resident requesting a revaluation will need to set an appointment for
. the assessor to view the home. At that point, a recommendation will be made to the Board. In the
event a property owner is not satisfied with the valuation of their property, they may fIle an appeal
with the County Board of Equalization. A property owner may also fIle in Tax Court at any time
up until March 31, 1998, on this value.
3. TESTIMONY BY RESIDENTS
William B. Wicka, 27930 Smithtown Road, PID 31-117-23-34-0001, stated he has
an unfinished basement which is not up to code and the attic is unfinished. He feels the high value
is due to lakeshore and noted he has the smallest property on Smithtown Bay. He has an easement
for driveway purposes and actually shares the drive with his neighbor. The neighbors recently
sold their property for approximately $405,000 and their lot is nearly three to four times larger. He
f((lt a home which recently sold at 6300 Srnithtown Road for less than $640,000 would be a
comparable home. Mr. Wicka felt the plats would be helpful in revaluing his property. He
purchased the home approximately two years and remodeled. The value last year was $420,000
and this year the value is $750,000. Mr. Wicka felt a figure of low $600,000 would be fair.
=t:F~
David Onan, 5525 Wedgewood Drive, PID 33-117-23-22-0029, stated his increase for
the year to be 10 percent or approximately $16,000. Since the time of purchase, Mr. Onan felt the
values had actually decreased. He commented his backyard is unusable for approximately four
months in the spring due to water drainage problems. In addition, the sewer has backed up several
times causing considerable damage to the home. Mr. Onan felt it would take approximately $2,000
to upgrade his driveway from the damage created by the heavy equipment. He noted his .
neighbors' properties have declined over the years. Due to the condition of his well, Mr. Onan
noted improvements will have to be made to obtain water in addition to the water assessments
which will be incurred. He noted his home needs some upgrading such as replacement of the
current roof.
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES
APRIL 2, 1997 - PAGE 2
Roger Dalum, 6000 Charleston Circle, PID 34-117-23-33-0031, stated his valuation
increased $18,000. Last year, the estimated value was $162,000 and this year increased to
$180,000. In comparing to other houses of the same size, the shape of the lot and the location
adjacent to the Shorewood Shopping Center need to be taken into consideration. Mr. Erickson did
not feel this increase to be unusual, and felt in this part of the city the homes in the $120,000 to
$180,000 range are affected the most. Mr. Erickson further explained the mass appraisal is not
perfect and he is looking at a range of values.
Dennis Frisch, 6125 Chaska Road, PID 34-117-23-34-0010, stated when the Summit
access was closed, the traffic in the area dramatically increased and this has negatively affected the
privacy which he was accustomed to. He stated three-quarters of his property is swamp and run-
off from Murray Hill. He stated his home was built in 1956 and is in need of a new roof. Mr.
Frisch felt the tax system to be very unfair. He stated he was subject to a 12.5 percent increase.
Harvey Strohm, 5945 Christmas Lake Road, PID 35-117-23-42-0017, provided a
sketch of the property. His value increased $25,000 despite the fact he lives in eastern
Shorewood. He stated the home was built in 1906 and there are no comparable homes in the area .
which have been or will be sold based on the age and condition of the property. Mr. Strohm stated
his valuation for 1996 increased 21,000. No improvements have been made on the property for
approximately 20 years. His neighbor, who has approximately 15 additional feet of lakeshore
property, received an increase of 5 percent, although his own increase is 7.55 percent. Mr.
Strohm stated the figures on the card he received do not add up to the final figure. In addition he
pointed out several defects now present in the house including high levels of radon. Mr. Strohm
provided pictures of the property to the Board for their review.
Mayor Dahlberg expressed concern for property owners who are taxed out of their property and in
some cases forced to subdivide.
Les Peltz, 23340 Park Street, PID 34-117-23-31-0039, stated his valuation increased
9.68 percent. He did not feel the circumstances would justify this degree of increase. Mr. Peltz
stated the roof is 18 years old and he requested an inspection of the property.
Mary Ann Davidson, 19730 Sweetwater Curve, PID 36-117-23-42-0020, provided a
handout reflecting the valuations from 1993 through 1997. She felt the prior years to be fair,
however, an increase of approximately $30,000 from 1996 to 1997 was excessive. Ms. Davidson
provided a handout stating the two homes highlighted on the handout are very comparable. to her
home. She did not feel a reasonable buyer would spend $471,000 to purchase her home. Ms.
Davidson provided. information obtained from realtors regarding comparable homes to the .assessor
for his review.
.
.
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES
APRIL 2, 1997 - PAGE 3
L. E. Leipold, 5670 Wedgewood Drive, PID 33-117-23-23-0058, stated his valuation
increased $13,000 from 1996. He asked if the average increase for Shorewood is 4.8 percent.
Mr. Erickson clarified that is cumulative and not an average. The overall classification increased
by 4.8 percent which excludes new improvements. The total residential increase was 4.6 percent
which was not an average. The increases ranged from 0 to 20 percent. The reason for the
decreases were due to properties selling for less than their valuation figure. Mr. Erickson
explained he works in a one square mile geographic area. He reviews the sales and then makes a
decision relative to what will happen with each section. Mr. Leipold inquired whether all
properties in the same area, as defined by the assessor, increased at the same rate. Mr. Erickson
stated they did not due to differing amenities and characteristics in the properties. Mr. Leipold
requested a review of his home.
Councilmember O'Neill remarked he would like to see an historical review of the market values in
Shorewood. He felt this information would assist in being able to understand the valuations.
Jo Cunningham, 28170 Woodside Road, PID 31-117-23-24-0010, stated her increase
to be $17,000 this year in light of the fact there have been no improvements to the property.
Jim Savoie, 5455 Gideon Lane, stated the Gideon Townhome Association has requested the
president of the association, Fred Dresser, address the Board. He stated most of the home owners
are senior citizens on a fixed income who moved to this area for the lower taxes. He stated that
despite information he was given by the developer, the valuations have almost doubled. Mr.
Dresser stated the quality of the water declined since being removed from the Tonka Bay system
and becoming hooked into the Shorewood system. He stated Gideon Woods does not receive
many benefits from the City noting they do not receive plowing services, road maintenance or
lighting from the City.
Mayor Dahlberg stated he did not believe the services which are not provided by the City would
drive the setting of valuation determinations.
Jim Savoie reiterated the concerns of Mr. Dresser and stated there are problems with the developer
arid was uncertain whether this had affected the property values. He stated Gideon Woods is not a
. prime area. He stated the valuation is based on a completed purchase even though the landscaping
and sodding has not been completed. Due to problems with the developer, a screen porch has not
been completed even though it was paid for.
Councilmember Stover suggested the surrounding neighbors join with the Gideon Woods
neighborhood and meet with the Council relative to the problems in the area in an attempt to resolve
these issues. Mayor Dahlberg also suggested meeting with the neighborhood on a Saturday to
discuss their concerns.
John Wood, 4915 Regents Walk, PID 25-117-23-23-0002, stated he recently
purchased the home for $260,000 in November of 1996 and noted the valuation for 1997 to be
approximately $313,000. At the time of purchase, he did review comparable homes in the area and
paid a well negotiated price. Work has been completed on the home, however, he did not feel a
valuation of $313,000 to be accurate. Mr. Wood requested the home be reviewed.
Linda Tilton, 5620 Covington, PID 36-117-23-24-0013, stated the valuation on her
property has increased from $518,000 an additional $62,000 in two years with no improvements.
The valuation has been increasing 7 percent in each of the prior two years. She pointed out this is
a very old home. The driveway is extremely difficult and the amount of repair necessary on the e.
property would preclude a sale. She noted most of the surrounding homes to be seven to eight .
years old with three car garages. This increase in value occurred after the increase which resulted
from improvements which were made. Ms. Tilton noted there is considerable work which needs
to be done and requested a review of the property.
Lindy Aagaard, 5640 Harding Avenue, PID 33-117-23-23-0037, stated his valuation
increased $14,000 for 1997. Since the property was built in 1987, the taxes have increased 40
percent. He stated he is being taxed out of the home. Mr. Erickson offered to view the property.
George Greenfield, 24715 Yellowstone Trail, reported a 6.8 percent increase which
resulted in an increase of $9,000 in a one year period. Mr. Greenfield expressed his belief that
people in a particular financial level are being driven out of Shorewood. He expressed satisfaction
with the services he receives from the City.
Mayor Dahlberg commented the affordable housing needs to be preserved. He also stated he will
do whatever he can to see the message reaches the legislators in St. Paul that this issue needs to be
addressed. Councilmember McCarty expressed her agreement that this issue needs to be e
addressed. Councilmember Stover remarked extended items such as county services have been
included in the property taxes and she felt the taxes collected through the property tax system
should pertain to the property.
Jerry O'Neill, 25540 Nelsine Drive, PID 33-117-23-22-0007, noted an increase in his
property valuation of 26 percent in the past four years. This year, despite the fact there were no
improvements made, the value increased $12,000. Mr. O'Neill requested a review of his property.
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES
APRIL 2, 1997 - PAGE 4
Brent Brooks, 5960 Galpin Lake Road, PID 34-117-23-42-0019, stated he lives on a
hill which is a significant disadvantage. In addition, he lives in close proximity to Highway 7.
Mr. Brooks stated the property was valued in 1996 at $93,000 and in 1997, $104,000. He
requested the property be reviewed and it was re-assessed on March 27, 1997, resulting in a
valuation which decreased from $104,000 to $98,000. Mr. Brooks felt this to also be excessive.
Mr. Erickson explained physical and functional problems would result in a decrease in the value.
Mr. Brooks pointed out the home was purchased in 1992 for $76,000. The value has increased
considerably each year resulting in a $30,000 increase in a five year period of time. Mr. Brooks
stated there have not been any improvements to the property other than minor maintenance.
Mr. Erickson stated the properties will be reviewed even though an onsite inspection may not be
necessary. If any questions arise, the property owner will be contacted.
John Garfunkel, 5665 Grant Lorenz Road, PID 32-117-23-13-0022, requested a
review noting an increase of 9.6 percent this year resulting in a valuation increase of $12,000.
Councilmember McCarty noted an increase in her valuation of $20,000 or 10 percent, although she
was not protesting this figure. She explained the driving force of this to be the number of property
owners who transfer in and out of the area. Mr. Erickson remarked 98 percent of the properties
sell for more than their valuation price.
.
~
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES
APRIL 2, 1997 - PAGE 5
Mayor Dahlberg feels the cities need to drive a change to the legislature to address this issue.
Councilmember Stover nOled the issue of the school portion of the property tax also needs to be
addressed. She conuneuled tfutt arguments have been made the school portion could better be
derived from income taxes.
Letters from the following resideuts who were unahle to attend the meeting Were received by the
Board of Review:
Gregg and Dorothy James, 450 Lafayette Ave, PID 34-1 17-23-21-0028
Kim A. Culp, 6 I 00 Apple Road
Stuart L. Finney, 197 I 0 Chartwell Hill, PID 36- I 17-23- I 3-0026
Charles J. Fox, 5660 Vine Hill Road, PID 36- I 17-23- I 4-0059
Earl Lund, 20965 Forest Drive
Mark McClure, 5820 Eureka Road, PID 33-117-23-32-0024
Muriel Morrow, 19925 Waterford Court, PID 25-117-23-43-0036 & PID 36-117-23-12-0065
Jerry Simmons, 24365 Smithtown Road, PID 33- I 17-23- 14-004 I
. Dorothy Lane, 5660 Christmas Lake Point, PID 35-117-23-14-0004
4. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO ASSESSOR
Mr. Erickson explained any property in which reconsideration was requested will be reviewed. It
a site visit has been made within the past two years, it may not be necessary to physically visit the
sile again. A recommendatiou will then be made to the Board. In the eVent a property owner is not
satisfied with the valuation of their property, an appeal may be filed with the County BOard of
Equalizatiou. An appeal may also be med in Tax Court at any time up until March 3 I, 1998, on
this valuation.
5. ESTABLISH DATE FOR BOARD TO RECONVENE
.
O'Neill moved, Stover seconded to reconvene the Board of Review at 7:00 p.m.
on April 14, 1997, and reconvene, if necessary, 011 April 15, 1997. Motion
passed 5/0.
6.
ADJOURN
MCCarty moved, GarfUnkel seconded to adjourn the Board of Review at 10:12
p.m. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
I CONTENTS PAGE
I 31-117-23-34-0001 WICKA WILLIAM 27930 SMITHTOWN RD n.
Ul
34-117-23-33-0031 DALlIM ROGER 6000 CHARLEST~~ CIR 02
I 34-117-23-34-0010 FRISCH DENNIS 6125 CHASKA RD 03
I 35-117-23-42-u017 STROHM HARVEY 5945 CHRIS~AS LK RD 04
33-117-23-22-0029 OI'IAN III l)AlJ lD 5525 WEDGEWOOD DR 05
I 34-117-23-31-0039 PELTZ LESLI E 23340 PARK ST 06
36-117-23-42-0020 DAVIDSON MARY 19730 SWEETWATER CUR 07
I 33-117-23-23-u058 LEIPOLD.JR L EDMOND 5670 WEDGBWOOD DR 03
31-117-23-24-0010 ClJi'tHNGHAI'1 JO 28170 WOODSIDE RD 09
I 33-117-23-12-0067 SAVOIE JAMES 5455 GIDEONS LN 10
~
I 31-117-23-14-0031 URBASICH ERIC 5785 BRENTRIDGE DR 11
25-117-23-23-0002 WOOD JOHN 4915 REGENTS WALK 12
I 33-117-23-22-0014 KRAUSS KELLY 5555 EUREKA RD 13
34-117-23-42-0019 BROOKS BRm 5960 GALPIN LK RD 14
I 36-117-23-24-0013 TILT~~ LINDA 5620 COVINGTON RD 15
I 33-1:7-23-12-0072 DRESSER FREDRICK 5480 GIDEONS LN 16
33-117-23-23-0037 AAGAARD LINDSAY 5640 HARDING AVE 17
I 33-117-23-21-0030 PIROYAti.JRlP WALLACE & KIMBERLY 24345 GLEN RD 18
25-117-23-34-0020 Me NALLY TERR~jCE 20390 EXCELSIOR BLVD 19
32-117-23-13-0022 GARFUNKEL JOH'i 5665 G~iT lORS4Z RD 20
33-117-23-22-0007 O'NEILL GERALD 25540 NELSINE DR ?1
...
33-117-23-43-0016 GREENFIELD GEORGE 24715 YELLOWST~4E TR 22
34-117-23-21-0028 JAt1ES GREGG 450 LAFAymE AVE 23
35-117-23-33-0037 CULP KIt1 6100 APPLE RD 24
36-117-23-13-0026 FINNEY STUART & GAIL 19710 CHARTWELL HILL 25
36-117-23-14-0059 FOX CHARLES &: KATHRrt~ 5660 VINE HILL RD 26
26-117-23-14-U004 LUND EARL 20965 FOREST DR 27
33-117-23-32-0024 MC CLlIRE NARK &: DEBRA 5820 EUREKA RD 28
25-117-23-43-0036 NORROW MURIEL 19925 WATERFORD CT 29
35-117-23-14-0004 LANE DOROTHY 5660CHRISTMAS LK PT 30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Bill Wicka
ADDRESS 27930 Smithtown Road
PID# 31-117-23-34-0001 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $420,000
STORY HGT. 2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA
GROUND FLR AREA
GARAGE - AIT.
DET.
TUCKUNDER 3 car
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE 6-19-95
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE 1
FULL 3
3/4
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 5
WALKOUT No
0%
YEARBUlLT remodeled '96
LOT SIZE 100 front feet
PORCH- GLAZED
SCREENED Yes
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES
LAKESHORE
3400
2632
Lower Lake
MISe. COMMENTS After purchase in 1995 the structure was completely remodeled including a
2nd story addition and 3 car garage. See attached 1992 sale of property 5 sites south of the subject.
See also 2nd attached sheet of 1996 lake shore sale on upper lake of smaller inferior structure on a
larger site.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 300000
BUILDING 120000
TOTAL 420000
ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson
1997 PAY 1998
318000
432700
750700
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
318000
398800
716800
DATE 4-7-97
1
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
-I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS
27970 Smithtown Rd.
PID#
31-117-23-34-0008
SALE PRICE $740,000.
YEAR BUILT 1964
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2506
GROUND FLOOR AREA 2506
SALE DATE 8-20-92
STORIES Rambler
PORCH OR DECK Deck
GARAGE 3 Car Tuckunder
BSM'T FINISHING
80%
# BEDROOMS
4
# BATHS 2-Full, 1-3/4, 1-1/2
F r R EPI.ACK<.j 2
CENTRAl. AIR Yes
LOT SIZE 140 FF
WALKOUT Yes
COMMENTS
Lakeshore- Smithtown Bav
1A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 27860 ISLAND VIEW RD
PID#: 31-117-23-12-0015
SALE PRICE: $ 677,500
YEAR BUILT: 1955
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 1754
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1754
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 3
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE (S) : 2
CENTRAL AIR: YES
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
9608
1 STORY
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY: Upper Lake
COMMENTS:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 2
3/4: 1
1/2: 0
LOT SIZE: 100
FF
60 %
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
1B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Roger Dalum
ADDRESS 6000 Charleston Circle
PID# 34- 117-23-33-0031 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 984
GROUND FLR AREA 984
GARAGE - AIT. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR
SALE DATE
BSMT. FlNISIDNG
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 2
3/4
1/2 1
# OF BEDROOMS 4
WALKOUT Yes
YEAR BUILT 1989
40% LOT SIZE 28533 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED Yes
OPEN Yes
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS House was reviewed in 1996. Based on location of house (backs up to shopping
center). decided to increase the amount of economicobsolescense.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAJij) 49500
BUILDING 119500
TOTAL 169000
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil
1997 PAY 1998
59500
120500
180000
RECOMMEND COUNCa ACTION
59500
116500
176000
DATE 4-8-97
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Dennis Frisch
ADDRESS 6125 Chaska Road
PID# 34-117-23-34-0010 PROPERTY TYPE B...-
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. Rambler
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1403
GROUND FLR. AREA 1403
GARAGE - AIT. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4
1/2 2
# OF BEDROOMS 3
WALKOUT Yes
YEARBUILT 1958
30% LOT SIZE 2.11 Acres
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK
# OF FIREPLACES 2
LAKE SHORE
MISC. COMMENTS See pg. 10, slightly smaller house on smaller site, page 12 for similar house on
similar site, and page 15 for newer, slightly larger house on smaller site.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~D 75000
BUILDING 78000
TOTAL 153000
ASSESSOR Tom Haller
1997 PAY 1998
90000
82000
172000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Harvey Strohm
ADDRESS 5945 Christmas Lake Road
PID# 35-117-23-42-0017 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1.75 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2002
GROUND FLR AREA 1174
GARAGE - ATT.
DET. 3 car
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4
1/2 1
# OF BEDROOMS 3
WALKOUT Yes
0%
YEARBUILT 1907
LOT SIZE 75 FF
PORCH- GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES
LAKESHORE Christmas Lk.
MISC. COMMENTS House was reviewed 4-8-97. House is in good condition but has a settling
problem due to lack of footin~. This has been taken into consideration and 20% functional
obsolescence is deducted from the value of the house. See sales book De. 92. This is on a much
smaller lot with just a point touching Christmas Lk. The property has no garage and is smaller in size.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997 1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
LAND 241000 255500 No
BUILDING 90000 100500 chanee
TOTAL 331000 356000
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil DATE 4-8-97
4
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME David Onan III
ADDRESS 5525 Wedgewood Drive
PID# 33-117-23-22-0029 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $194,250
STORY HGT. 2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2768
GROUND FLR. AREA 1456
GARAGE - AIT. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE 12-94
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 2
3/4 1
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 4
WALKOUT Yes
YEAR BUILT 1978
70% LOT SIZE 32760
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 2
LAKESHORE N/A
MISe. COMMENTS See sales on page 50, smaller house on larger lot, page 56, newer, smaller
house on larger lot.. ;
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 40000
BUILDING 146000
TOTAL 186000
ASSESSOR Tom Haller
1997 PAY 1998
48000
154000
202000
~COMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Leslie Peltz
ADDRESS 233-40 Park Street
PID#34-11 7-23-31-0039 PROPERTY TYPER--
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1264
GROUND FLR. AREA 1264.
GARAGE ~A1T. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes.
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BAlli - DELUXE
FULL I
3/4 1
112
# OF BEDROOMS 2
WALKOUT
YEARBUILT 1963
40% . WT SIZE 11700
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED.
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKESHORE
. MISC. COMMENTS Structure value adjusted due to dated interior and some deferred maintenance.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAJijD 39000
BUllDING 85000
TOTAL 124000
ASSESSOR Tom HaIler
1997 PAY 1998
46500
89500
136000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
46500
81800
128300
DATE 4-4-97
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Eric & Mary Davidson
ADDRESS 19730 Sweetwater Curve
PID# 36-117-23-42-0020 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $420,000 SALE DATE 8-5-93 YEAR BUILT 1988
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 30% LOT SIZE 39200
GROSS BLDG. AREA 3269 BATH- DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR. AREA 1653 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE- ATT. 3 car 3/4 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS Adjustment is based on a reduction of the interior quality grade of the
structure. See pages 74 and 75 for larger houses on smaller sites. See also attached sheet for 1994
sale of property adjacent to the subject property.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LPUSIT) 119500
BUILDING 323500
TOTAL 443000
ASSESSOR Tom Haller
1997 PAY 1998
131500
339500
471000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
131500
315500
447000
DATE 4-7-97
7
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING: 60 %
PORCH-GLAZED: YES
SCREEN:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 2
3/4 : 0
1/2: 1
LOT SIZE: 46,400 SF
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
I
I
I
~
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 19740 SWEETWATER CUR
PID#: 36-117-23-42-0021
SALE PRICE: $ 457,000
YEAR BUILT: 1989
GROSS BLDG. AREA : 2814
GROUND FLR. AREA : 1614
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 3
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S): 1
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS:
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
7A
9410
2 STORY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Ed Leipold
ADDRESS 5670 Wedgewood Drive
PID# 33-117-23-23-0058 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE
STORY HGT. 2 BSMT. FINISHING
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1925 BATH - DELUXE
GROUND FLR AREA 1312 FULL 1
GARAGE - ATT. 3 car 3/4 1
DET. 1/2 1
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT
MISC. COMMENTS See Page 43
YEARBUILT 1994
0% LOT SIZE 33200 S.F.
PORCH- GLAZED Yes
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKESHORE
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 38000
BUILDING 117500
TOTAL 155500
ASSESSOR David Wilde
1997 PAY 1998
45500
122500
168000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Jo Cunningham
ADDRESS 28170 Woodside Road
PID# 31-117-23-24-0010 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $N/A SALE DATE N/A YEARBUILT 1900
STORY HGT. 1 BSMT. FINISHING 30% LOT SIZE 21780 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2348 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 2348 FULL 2 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATI. 3/4 OPEN Yes
DET. 1/2 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER 2 # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRAL AIR No WALKOUT LAKE SHORE 75' Upper Lk.
MISe. COMMENTS Marginallakeshore access. House set back several hundred feet from lake.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 222500
BUILDING 89500
TOTAL 312000
ASSESSOR David F. Wilde
1997 PAY 1998
236000
93000
329000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
220000
92000
312000
DATE 4-4-97
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Jim Savoie
ADDRESS 5455 Gideons Lane
PID# 33~ 117~23-12~0067 PROPERTY TYPE R2
SALE PRICE $210,475 new SALE DATE 2-96 YEAR BUILT 1996
STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING *40% LOT SIZE
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1704 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 1704 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - AIT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE
MISC. COMMENTS * Only 80% of gross building area has basement. The owner did not request
an a ointment for an ins ection. See attached sale sheet recent resale of similar twinbome in
different location.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 35000
BUILDING (incomplete) 46700
TOTAL 81700
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 1995
42000
150100
192100
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5252 SPRING CIR
PID#: 25-117-23-34-0033
SALE PRICE: $ 253,000
YEAR BUILT: 1994
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2179
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1739
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS:
FIREPLACE (S) :
CENTRAL AIR:
WALKOUT:
LAKESHORE-BAY: HOME NO BASEMENT
COMMENTS: "NEW HOUSE" SALE PRICE $227,000 5/94 IS AN 11% INCREASE.
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK:
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
9503
2 STORY
00 %
o
1
YES
OPEN: YES
BATH-DELUXE: 1
FULL: 2
3/4: 1
1/2: 0
LOT SIZE:
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
10A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Eric Urbasich
ADDRESS 5785 Brentridge Drive
PID# 31-117-23-14-0031 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $254,000 SALE DATE 1-26-96 YEAR BUILT 1990
STORY HGT. 2 BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 24000 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2776 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR AREA 1412 FULL 2 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATT. 3 car 3/4 OPEN Yes
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE No
MISC. COMMENTS See page 67 in sales book for a sale of a slightly larger house in same
nei borhood. See followin a e for an older sale of a smaller house with 2 car ara e. I believe
the subiect property sold under market. I have offered to inspect the property but the owner declined
inspection.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 56000
BUILDING 198000
TOTAL 254000
ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson
1997 PAY 1998
56000
211000
267000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5775 BRENTRIDGE DR
PID#: 31-117-23-14-0030
SALE PRICE: $ 257,900
YEAR BUILT: 1991
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2368
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1240
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S): 2
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS: ..
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
9311
2 STORY
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING: 00 %
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE: 1
FULL: 1
3/4: 0
1/2: 2
LOT SIZE: 0.60 AC
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
11A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME John Wood
ADDRESS 4915 Regents Walk
PID# 25-117-23-23-0002 PROPERTY TYPE RZ
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1974
STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 50% LOT SIZE
GROSS BWG. AREA 2716 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR AREA 2716 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - AlT. Yes 2 cPt1l. 3/4 1 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE
:MISC. COM:MENTS See two supplemental sales data forms. Homeowner said improvements have
been done since purchase. We made two appointments for interior inspections that the homeowner
cancelled.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 95000
BlTIIJDTING 218500
TOTAL 313500
ASSESSOR Thomas M. Carroll
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
1997 PAY 1998
95000
218500
313 500
DATE 4-8-97
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN:
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 4895 REGENTS WALK
PID#: 25-117-23-23-0065
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
12A
SALE PRICE: $ 329,620
YEAR BUILT: 1981
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 1822
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1822
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE (S) : 1
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS: 10-93/307,000.00
9604
1 STORY
60 %
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 1
3/4 : 2
1/2: 0
LOT SIZE:
AMESBURY COURTYARD HOME
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 4875 REGENTS WALK
PID#: 25-117-23-24-0036
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
12B
SALE PRICE: $ 325,000
YEAR BUILT: 1975
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2250
GROUND FLR. AREA: 2250
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S): 2
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS: 08-89/210,000.00
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
9610
1 STORY
50 %
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 2
3/4 : 1
1/2: 1
, LOT SIZE:
AMESBURY COURTYARD HOME
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Kelly Krauss
ADDRESS 5555-25 Eureka Road
PID# 33-117-23-22-0014 PROPERTY TYPE DB
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1964
STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 34925 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2442 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 2442 FULL 1 ea. unit SCREENED
GARAGE- ATT. 3/4 OPEN
DET. 2 car 1/2 DECK
TUCKUNDER 1 car # OF BEDROOMS 3 ea. unit # OF FIREPLACES
CENTRAL AIR WALKOUT LAKESHORE
MISC. COMMENTS Review of property showed some deferred maintenance. Income of rented
unit also substantiates this reduction. This home is a double.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 38400
BUILDING 90600
TOTAL 129000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 1998
42200
99700
141900
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
42200
86800
129000
DATE 4-7-97
13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Brett Brooks
ADDRESS 5960 Galpin Lake Rd.
PID# 34-117-23-42-0019 PROPERTY TYPE B--
MISe. COMMENTS No basement. Very steep driveway. Refer to pg. 26 sales booke
SALE PRICE $76,050
STORYHGT. 1
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1060
GROUND FLR. AREA 1060
GARAGE - ATT.
DET. 2
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE 7-1-92
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 1
WALKOUT
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LA~ 45000
BUILDING 48000
TOTAL 93000
ASSESSOR David Wilde
1997 PAY 1998
48000
50000
98000
14
YEAR BUILT 1949
% LOT SIZE 26572 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKESHORE
RECOMME~ COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-5-97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Louis & Linda Tilton
ADDRESS 5620 Covington Road
PID# 36-117-23-24-0013 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $460,000 SALE DATE 9/88 YEAR BUILT 1900
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 60% LOT SIZE 114 FF
GROSS BLDG. AREA 3973 BATH- DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 3029 FULL 3 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATI. 3/4 1 OPEN
DET. 2 car 1/2 2 DECK
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 3
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE Christmas Lk.
MISC. COMMENTS Property was purchased in 9/88 for $460,000. Owner has since added an
excellent Quality 1990 style kitchen and a ~ood Quality office addition. The house was inspected. and
repair items and garage situation is reflected in our value.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997 1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
LAND 262500 278000 No
BUILDING 221500 240000 change
TOTAL 484000 518000
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil DATE 4-8-97
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Fred Dresser
ADDRESS 5480 Gideons Lane
PID# 33-117-23-12-0072 PROPERTY TYPE R1.
SALE PRICE $155,000 new SALE DATE 6-94 YEAR BUILT 1994
STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISHING 80% LOT SIZE
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1404 BATH- DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR. AREA 1404 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE- ATT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 2 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT No LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS Since purchase owner has finished basement completed for 1997 assessment.
Owner did not request property inspection. See attached sales sheet recent resale of similar
twinbome in different location.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 35000
BUILDING (incomplete) 130000
TOTAL 165000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 1998
42000
134600
177600
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5252 SPRING CIR
PID#: 25-117-23-34-0033
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S): 1
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT:
LAKESHORE-BAY: HOME NO BASEMENT
COMMENTS: "NEW HOUSE" SALE PRICE $227,000 5/94 IS AN 11% INCREASE.
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
SALE PRICE: $ 253,000
YEAR BUILT: 1994
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2179
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1739
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
16A
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK:
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
9503
2 STORY
00 %
OPEN: YES
BATH-DELUXE: 1
FULL: 2
3/4: 1
1/2: 0
LOT SIZE:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Lindsay Aagard
ADDRESS 5640 Harding Ave.
PID# 33-117-23-23-0037 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1988
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 20,000 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1586 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR AREA 888 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATT. 2 car 3/4 1 OPEN Yes
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE
MISC. COMMENTS The style of this home is desirable in today's market. See page 43 for a sale
from over a year ago in subject home's neighborhood. See page 44 for a comparable house with an
inferior lot and without a deck. Both sales do have more living space.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 40500
BUILDING 95500
TOTAL 136000
ASSESSOR Thomas M. Carroll
1997 PAY 1998
48500
101500
150000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Kim & Wally Piroyan
ADDRESS 24845 Glen Road
PID# 33-117-23-21-0030 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $194,000 SALE DATE 6-27-96 YEAR BUILT 1915
STORY HGT. 1-3/4 story BSMT. FINISIllNG 0% LOT SIZE 79947 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1860 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR AREA 1212 FULL 1 SCREENED Yes
GARAGE - ATI. 3/4 OPEN
DET. 2 ear 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCK UNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRAL AIR WALKOUT LAKE SHORE
MISe. COMMENTS Sales book see pg. 28 smaller home and lot. Also see pages 37 and 39 slightly
larger homes and lots than subiect.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LA}il) 80000
BUILDING 78000
TOTAL 158000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 1998
96000
83000
179000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Terrance McNally
ADDRESS 20390 Excelsior Blvd.
PID# 25-117-23-34-0020 PROPERTY TYPE B:.-
SALE PRlCE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1924
STORY HGT. Rambler BSMT. FINISHING 40% LOT SIZE 23430 SF
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1260 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 1260 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE- AIT. 3/4 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK
TUCKUNDER 1 # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRAL AIR No WALKOUT Yes LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS See sales book pages 2,3,5, and 7. They are newer homes; however, they
have less square feet and smaller lots. This property is on a high wooded lot.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 59500
BUILDING 49500
TOTAL 109000
ASSESSOR Thomas M. Carroll
1997 PAY 1998
59500
51500
111 000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME John Garfunkel
ADDRESS 5665 Grant Lorenz Road
PID# 32-117-23-13-0022 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1620
GROUND FLR. AREA 1620
GARAGE - A IT. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH- DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4 1
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 3
WALKOUT No
YEARBUILT 1977
20% LOT SIZE 47916 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED Yes
OPEN
DECK No
# OF FIREPLACES
LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS See pages 12, 15, and 17 in sales book. Sales on page 12 and 15 are both
smaller, located on smaller sites, and have more finished basement. Sale on page 17 is slightly
larger. on a smaller site.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 48000
BUILDING 102000
TOTAL 150000
ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson
1997 PAY 1998
55000
107000
162000
RECOMMENn COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Jerry O'Neill
ADDRESS 25540 Nelsine Drive
PID# 33-117-23-22-0007 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $159,500 SALE DATE 5-1-94 YEAR BUILT 1989
STORY HGT. 2 BSMT. FINISHING 0% LOT SIZE 35112 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1916 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 1104 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES No
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKE SHORE No
MISC. COMMENTS See page 43 in sales book. Sale is smaller, slightly higher quality, with a
smaller site. It also has some finished basement. See following sale of slightly larger home on a
smaller lot which also has other minor differences. Home sold on 9-3-93 for 147.500 and a pool was
added between sales. The home resold on 7-94 for 190,000.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAJij) 46000
BUILDING 111000
TOTAL 157000
ASSESSOR Rolf Erickson
1997 PAY 1998
55000
119000
174000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5679 HARDING LN
PID#: 33-117-23-23-0056
SALE PRICE: $ 190,000
YEAR BUILT: 1989
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 2202
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1136
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 2
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S): 1
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT:
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS:
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
9407
2 STORY
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING: 00 %
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN: YES
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 1
3/4: 1
1/2: 1
LOT SIZE: 0.50 AC
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
21A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME George Greenfield
ADDRESS 24715 Yellowstone Tr.
PID# 33-117-23-43-0016 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1957
STORY HGT. 1 Story BSMT. FINISHING 50% LOT SIZE 31799 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1554 BATH - DELUXE PORCH - GLAZED
GROUND FLR. AREA 1554 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - ATT. 2 car 3/4 1 OPEN Yes
DET. 1/2 1 DECK
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 3 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE
MISC. COMMENTS Mr. Greenfield did not return my calls. In sales book see pg. 9 smaller home
on lar er lot. See . 15 newer home on smaller level lot. Mr. Greenfield's home does have a stee
driveway and he is located across from the golf course.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 48000
BUILDING 84000
TOTAL 132000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 1998
53000
88000
141000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Gregg James
ADDRESS 450 Lafayette
PID# 34-117-23-21-0028 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISIDNG
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1413 BATH - DELUXE
GROUND FLR AREA 963 FULL 2
GARAGE - AlT. 3/4
DET. 1 car 1/2 DECK
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRALAIR Yes WALKOUT LAKE SHORE Gideon'sBay
MISC. COMMENTS See attached sale of house next door. Subject property has a superior house on a
slightly inferior lot (less area and front footage).
YEAR BUll.T 1920
0% LOT SIZE 44 FF
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 80000
BUILDING 53500
TOTAL 133500
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil
1997 PAY 1998
84500
56500
141000
RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-3-97
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 448 LAFAYETTE AVE
PID#: 34-117-23-21-0027
SALE PRICE: $ 150,000
YEAR BUILT: 1946
GROSS BLDG. AREA : 1116
GROUND FLR. AREA : 1116
GARAGE #1: DETACHED
# OF CARS: 1
SALE DATE:
. STORY HEIGHT:
DECK:
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE:
FULL:
3/4 :
1/2:
LOT SIZE:
9506
1 STORY
00 %
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S) :
CENTRAL AIR:
WALKOUT:
LAKESHORE-BAY: GIDEON'S BAY
COMMENTS: NO BASEMENT
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
23A
o
1
o
o
47
FF
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Kim Culp
ADDRESS 6100 ApDle Road
PID# 35-117-23-33..0037 PROPERTY TYPE R---
SALE PRICE $705,000 SALE DATE 10-94 YEAR BUILT 1987
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FlNISIDNG 0% LOT SIZE 6.5 Acres
GROSS BLDG. AREA 6660 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR AREA 4159 FULL 2 SCREENED
GARAGE - AlT. 3 car 3/4 3 OPEN
DET. 1/2 1 DECK
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 5 # OF FIREPLACES 4
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE
MISC. COMMENTS Note sale price of subject property. See sale on page 78 of smaller house on
smaller site and attached sheet for smaller house on smaller site.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 124500
BUILDING 582200
TOTAL 706700
ASSESSOR Tom Haller
1997 PAY 1998
124500
607500
732000
RECOMMEND COUNCn.. ACTION
No
change
DATE 4-7-97
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5275 ST ALBANS BAY RD
PID#: 25-117-23-33-0048
SALE PRICE: $ 682,000
YEAR BUILT: 1988
GROSS BLDG. AREA: 4911
GROUND FLR. AREA: 3998
GARAGE #1: TUCKUNDER
# OF CARS: 3
SALE DATE:
STORY HEIGHT:
DECK:
BSMT. FINISHING:
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE:
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE (S): 3
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS:
9611
2 STORY
20 %
YES
1
FULL: 1
3/4: 3
1/2: 1
LOT SIZE: 170,000 SF C~,9 Ac.rf.SJ
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
24A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ -~.t
. ..,
<.'
" -
. \, .
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 6100 APPLE RD
PID#: 35-117-23-33-0037
SALE PRICE: $ 705,000
YEAR BUILT: 1987
GROSS BLDG. AREA : 6660
GROUND FLR. AREA: 4159
GARAGE #1: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 3
SALE DATE: 9410
STORY HEIGHT: 2 STORY
DECK:
BSMT. FINISHING: 00 %
PORCH-GLAZED: YES
SCREEN:
OPEN:
BATH-DELUXE: 1
FULL: 2
3/4: 3
1/2: 2
LOT SIZE: 6.52 AC
GARAGE #2:
# OF CARS: 0
FIREPLACE(S}: 3
CENTRAL AIR: YES
WALKOUT:
LAKESHORE-BAY:
COMMENTS:
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
24B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Stuart & Gail Finney
ADDRESS 19710 Chartwell Hill
PID# 36-117-23-13-0026 PROPERTY TYPE ~
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2657
GROUND FLR. AREA 1539
GARAGE - ATT. 3.car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH- DELUXE
FULL 2
3/4
1/2 2
# OF BEDROOMS 4
WALKOUT
YEAR BUILT 1988
50% LOT SIZE 23600 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED Yes
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKE SHORE
MISC. COMMENTS See pg. 59 slightly smaller home on inferior site (on comer of Old Market Rd.
and Chartwell Hill . See . 60 sli t1 smaller home on inferior site on comer of Old Market Rd.
and Chartwell Hill).
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAU\U) 96000
BUILDING 222000
TOTAL 318000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott
1997 PAY 199~
96000
232000
328000
RECOMMFND COUNr.IL ACTIO:N
No
change
DATE 4-4-97
25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Charles & Kathrvn Fox
ADDRESS 5660 Vine Hill Road
PID# 36-117-23-14-0059 PROPERTY TYPE R--
SALE PRICE $ SALE DATE YEAR BUILT 1989
STORY HGT. 2 story BSMT. FINISIDNG 0% LOT SIZE 12820 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2254 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR AREA 1134 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - AIT. 2 car 3/4 OPEN Yes
DET. 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 4 # OF FIREPLACES 2
CENTRAL AlR Yes WALKOUT Yes LAKESHORE
MISC. COMMENTS See sales book page 48 -- smaller house on a less trafficked street. Also see
p""e 53 -- sli$lv older house and similar in size.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAUSa) 43000
BUILDING 147000
TOTAL 190000
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil
1997 PAY 1998
38000
154000
192000
RECOMMEND COUNCa ACTION
No
chanee
DATE 4-8-97
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1 stOIy
GROSS BLDG. AREA
GROUND FLR. AREA
GARAGE - AlT.
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR.
MISC. COMMENTS Owner will not be available until May for us to review interior of house. Based
on exterior ins ection no chan es need to be made. Owner is reservin his ri t to attend Coun
Board.
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Earl Lund
ADDRESS 20965 Forest Drive
PID# 26-117-23-14-0004 PROPERTY TYPE R--
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISffiNG
1960 BATH- DELUXE
1960 FlTILL 2
3/4
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 5
WALKOUT
YEARBUILT 1924
0% LOT SIZE 16&55 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED Yes
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK
# OF FlREPLACES 1
LAKESHORE"
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 39500
BUILDING 50500
TOTAL 90000
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil
1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
39500 No
60500 chanee
100000
DATE 4-8-97
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Mark & Debra McClure
ADDRESS 5820 Eureka Road
PID# 33-117-23-32-0024 PROPERTY TYPE R--
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1-1/2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1492
GROUND FLR AREA 1120
GARAGE - AlT.
DET. 2 car
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BATH - DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4
1/2 1
# OF BEDROOMS 3
WALKOUT
YEARBUIT..T 1915
0% LOT SIZE 62000 S.F.
PORCH - GLAZED Yes
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 1
LAKE SHORE
MISC. COMMENTS Subject is older well maintained structure on a picturesque 1.4 acre site. See
p~e 28 for smaller structure on similar site. p~e 31 sli~tly larger house on similar site and p~e 32
for lare-er structure on similar site.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
LAU\a) 55000
BUIT..DING 68000
TOTAL 123000
ASSESSOR Tom Haller
1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
66000 No
72000 chanee
138000
DATE 4-8-97
28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Muriel Morrow
ADDRESS 19925 Waterford Court
PID# 25-117-23-43-0036 PROPERTY TYPE RZ
SALE PRICE $225,466 SALE DATE 10/94 YEAR BUILT 1994
STORY HGT. 1 story BSMT. FINISIDNG 50% LOT SIZE 10350 S.F.
GROSS BLDG. AREA 1722 BATH - DELUXE 1 PORCH - GLAZED Yes
GROUND FLR. AREA 1722 FULL 1 SCREENED
GARAGE - AlT. '2. C A-n.. 3/4 OPEN
DET. ~ 1/2 1 DECK Yes
TUCKUNDER # OF BEDROOMS 1 # OF FIREPLACES 1
CENTRAL AIR Yes WALKOUT LAKESHORE
MISe. COMMENTS Property was purchased in 10/94 for $225,466. Two resales in Waterford Court
have both sold for more than original purchase price. PID# 36-117-23-12-0065 is an outlot that
crosses the school district boundary valued at $100. This. homp on 1 y h....!=: onp lor r w'hi /""h
~-is divided into tlAn PID'!=;.
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997
L~ 40000
BUILDING 175800
TOTAL 215800
ASSESSOR Gail Navratil
1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION
40000 No
178000 chanee
218000
DATE 4-3-97
29
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET
NAME Dorothy Lane
ADDRESS 5660 Christmas Lake Pt.
PID# 35-117-23-14-0004 PROPERTY TYPE RL
SALE PRICE $
STORY HGT. 1-1/2 story
GROSS BLDG. AREA 2088
GROUND FLR AREA 1392
GARAGE - AlT. 2 car
DET.
TUCKUNDER
CENTRAL AIR Yes
SALE DATE
BSMT. FINISHING
BAlli - DELUXE
FULL 1
3/4 1
1/2
# OF BEDROOMS 3
WALKOUT Yes
YEAR BUlLT 1966
50% LOT SIZE 100 FF
PORCH - GLAZED
SCREENED
OPEN
DECK Yes
# OF FIREPLACES 3
LAKE SHORE Christmas Lk.
MISe. COMMENTS In sales book see pg. 92 slightly superior house (remodeled) on inferior site,
the tip of which has contact with the lake. See attached map. (Continued on addendum.)
VALUATION 1996 PAY 1997 1997 PAY 1998 RECOMMEND COUNCn. ACTION
LAND 11 0000 116500 No
BUlLDING 129100 135500 change
TOTAL 239100 252000
ASSESSOR Lisa Mott DATE 4-4-97
30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ADDENDUM
Name Dorothy Lane
Address 5660 Christmas Lake Pt.
PID# 35-117-23-14-0004
Comments:
See attached Comparable 2 which has significantly less square footage and whose lakeshore has less
front footage and is bisected by Christmas Lake Road. This sale was in the 1996 sales book. See
attached Comparable 3 again smaller than subject and the lakeshore front footage is half that of the
subject's. It is a 1993 sale. Overall lot is larger and wooded.
30A
I~)
I
. v<:' t.::> ~O\. ,0...1};-
~~l
~' ......,
;,:
...:
\0:
,..,.
'i"
-""\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
5v..b',) ~0-t
l/l
~
c:::
o
<.0
:;;
O'l
r<'>
"
",/
~!
~i
....
O'
~"
....
~)~~
~M~
I
I
GOVT LOT 5
@
30B
.'
, , .
o. -'.:
.......
......
...
.. -0.
..:....
..:....
:.....
...
.' .
-0.:...:
: 0:0 :.~
.
.._ o.
. .
......
'. .
......
..- .-.
....:. .,:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.' : ,. - ':~ >:':._;t~o/-~il~~f0;!:f?!~;~:;~~'
_~Aii' ~. .~___.,.,,_._.....><.., ~
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
ADDRESS: 5780 CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD
PID#: 35-117-23-13-0020
SALE PRICE: $ 200,000
YEAR BUILT: 1956
GROSS BLDG. AREA : 1237
GROUND FLR. AREA: 1237
GARAGE #1: TUCKUNDER
# OF CARS: 1
GARAGE #2: ATTACHED
# OF CARS: 1
SALE DATE: 9506
STORY HEIGHT: 1 STORY
DECK: YES
BSMT. FINISHING: 30 %
PORCH-GLAZED:
SCREEN:
OPEN: YES
BATH-DELUXE: 0
FULL: 1
3/4: 0
1/2: 1
LOT SIZE: 67 FF
FIREPLACE(S): 1
CENTRAL AIR:
WALKOUT: YES
LAKESHORE-BAY: CHRISTMAS LAKE
COMMENTS: BiSE"c..tG-D LA K~5ho('G bL-J thR- rOAD I
INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
COMPARABLE 2
30C
RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I'
\ .;
ADDRESS
5590 Christmas Lake Pt.
PID# 35-117-23-11-0047
COMPARABLE 3
30D
,
,
''-'~'"
. "I.
.~l..
SALE DATE 3-1-93
STORY Split Fover
DECK Yes
BSMT. FINISHING
PORCH-GLAZED
SCREEN
OPEN
BATH-DELUXE
FULL
3/4
1/2
LOT SIZE 50 FF
MISC. COMMENTS
80
Yes
Yes
2
%
~
Robert W. Fayfield
6005 Christmas Lake Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
April 14, 1997
Shorewood City Council
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council;
I have been a resident at Christmas Lake for 54 years, during which time there has
been a dock continuously located and used at its current position on my property. I can
provide a large number of affidavits to that effect, if required.
I would like to sell to my children a small parcel of my lakeshore property containing
said dock. The parcel of land will be no smaller than, and the dock no larger than the
unplatted parcel and dock directly north of and contiguous to 5885 Christmas Lake
Road.
I will not proceed with the transaction until you have had a chance to resolve the
pending issue for that property; if you determine that the dock located there is not
permitted, I will withdraw my request.
Very truly yours, ~. .
/4 / /:///,-
P' ~~7 '
Robert W. Fayfield
cc: R. Mitchell, Lindquist & Vennum
~
..
,
.
I
I
LAKE MINNETONKA
;-I1/melC/IC.
7c'C~
c::'.cc ~It
.-
N CHRISTI
M+~
IiORS(
fAllIl
TROEHOU: WILSON
OW!"
8EHHETt
LAKE LUCY AD
-..
04/03/1997 16:52 6124747594
RENEE PIERRO
PAGE 02
~
~.
2Apri197
To the members of the Shorewood City Council:
My name is Michael Pierro. I spoke at the hearing invoMng the CabaJka issue. I wish
to make some observations.
-To the issue of a dock (usable) being continuously at this site. The answer Is simply
NO. Your planning department says NO, I, who own property 40' away say NO. and at
least two other neighbors (Fayfield & Benson) say NO. I read both Bill Mady and
George Noren's letters and neither says yes. Both agree the dock WAS there In the
earlier years. I doubt neither would be aware of its continuous existence, particularly if
under the water or hidden by weeds (1 SO' dock hidden by weeds?). Also. neither aves
by this property nor pass by it frequently.
I suggest all of you get In your car and drive by the site. You will note
THERE ARE NO WEEDS-- ITS WINTER AND THEY DIE I Yes there are some
stocks , but these are relatively recent (Blue Strife-not in our araa In the late 70's Of
early SO's). You can clearly see the dock AND SO YOU CAN FOR SI!VEN
MONTHS OF THE YEAR. So when Bob Fayfield said he went by the area
thousands of times and didn't see a dock IT WASN'T because of the weeds; It was
because no dock was present.
...on this next issue. I dearly hope I am wrong. I left with the distinct feefing that our
Mayor, though he pubndy stated this was a fact finding meeting. clearly was biased
toward the CabaIka's and has his mind made up. He went out of his way, in fact LEO
Mr. Cabalka into testimony unrelated to the continuous existence of the dock. I was
reprimanded by the mayor for discussing the Non-Residency Issue of the owners (who
are not Jim or Betty). Yet shortly afterward the mayor solicited more ancient testimony,
even after he said it was a given the dock did exist In the 50's and 60's. Pictures from
the 50's were distributed and a discussion of weeds prevailed.
If this is true it bodes ill for our city.
I wish you all well.
Michael Pierro ~
5880 Christmas lake Road
Shorewood. Mn 55331
4747471
April 08, 1997
I~~CG~~~~~I
I~ APR 10 1997 ~
lBy
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club RD.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Attn: Mayor Tom Dahlberg
City Council Members
Dear City Officials,
I would like to comment on the issue regarding the dispute about
the. Cabalka property on Christmas Lake. I was raised in this
neighborhood as a child and knew the Cab.lka's, as my parents were
friends with them. Therefore it is hard for me to express the opinion,
that I feel that they are not being completely honest in they're
representation of the facts regarding the dock on this particular parcel
of land. The dock that they used when they lived there, ( at least until
1968 ) was located on the parcel that they're house sat on,
approximately were Kuester's is now.
Personally I am opposed to the precedence being set, allowing
someone not living on or even near the lake, not to mention not even in
the City of Shorewood, having only a piece of land with a dock. I would
hate to see the results of such a precedence. There would be nothing
to stop someone from selling off a piece of their lakeshore land to
friends, relatives or just the highest bidder. Is there not a city
ordinance that Is supposed to prevent this very thing? If so, why is
there even a question as to what should be done?
I strongly urge all of you, to disallow the request to keep the dock!
steven w. rtin
5750 Christmas Lk. Rd.
Shorewood, MN. 55331
471-9585
-
KELLY LAW OFFICES
Established 1948
351 SECOND STREET
EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331
April 10, 1997
. r,- -...... ~
I~ ~ (C; ~ ll'\# ~~I
llf1l h d 1991 ~I
ley ~
(612) 474-5977
FAX 474-9575
MARK W. KELLY
WILLIAM F. KELLY (1922-1995)
Jim Hurm
City Administrator
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, ~N 55331
Re: Cabalka Dock Question
Dear ~r. Hurm:
At my clients request, I have been asked to respond to the most recent
discussions of the Shorewood City Council.
The matter before the City Council arises from a determination by the City Zoning
Administrator that the Cabalka's forty year use of docking on Christmas Lake
should now be determined illegal and not recognized as grandfathered under a
1965 ordinance. The Cabalka's were invited to appeal that decision to the
Planning Commission and on to the City Council which they have done. And.
while earlier the City Council had been advised by the City Attorney that the
burden of proof in this matter lay with the Cabalka's, your present City Attorney
made it clear, on ~arch 31st, that the burden of proof ultimately rests with the
City if it intends to press this matter in the courts. We are of the opinion that the
City cannot meet that legal burden.
There is no justification for this attack on the Cabalka's dock rights. Among the
arguments put forward to justify taking action are:
1) we can do what we wish, they do not vote - they do not matter;
2) a ''bad precedent" will be set; and
3) the dock damages property values.
The first is parochial and contemptuous of the rights of persons no longer
residents in the City. The second is nonsense - recognizing grandfather status
creates no precedent. The third is a remarkably silly suggestion given the fact
that that strip of Christmas Lake Road is host to any number of docks which are
otherwise unidenttfiable to any particular house and largely separate from their
principal structures. To the casual observer. no one knows the difference.
KELLY LAW OFFICES
-2-
The appeal process of the of the Zoning Administrator's decision puts the City
Council in the position of having to overturn its Zoning Administrator's decision.
This obviously is an uncomfortable decision for the Council to make and may be
dl:fficult to explain. Your City Attorney has advised that any action taken by the
City to terminate the use of a dock from the Cabalka property is tantamount to
condemning the property in total by removing all reasonable use of the land. I
believe that your City Council has been further advised that the City may be
exposed to claims as a result of such action. If. for no other reason. the City
should proceed cautiously.
Litigation initiated by the City will not necessarily accelerate the removal of the
dock but will most likely cost the City money. Keep in mind that the Cabalka's
are not threatening litigation. but will respond in kind if confronted by
prosecution. motion for injunctive relief. or trespass. And. so there be no
confusion. please be informed that City officials or agents may not enter upon the
Cabalka property without prior written permission of the Cabalka's.
In the end. the City must ask itself whether it will benefit from pressing this issue
and gain something that it might not otherwise obtain by patience. My clients
renew their request that the City make a determination that the Cabalka's rights
predate the ordinance in question and that no further action in this matter is .
warranted.
----
Sincerely.
'7~~J~~
Mark\.V.-Keuy_
MWK/tas
cc: Jim and Betty Cabalka
Ca'tolyn C/. ~'lui'tE.~
58 00 Ch.'tiitma~ ..f}ake. d? oad
~h.o'tE.'l1ood, o'Vtinm:iota 55331
"
'flU (q-r
~ Cvu~ ~ lf~oIl,
/J ~ .NV~9 Cfl~fJ
~ Ccv6~C0 /)~ Of\J
~~ ~cJ~ ~oo.d..
a.P 'jCU ~ k~, -rk
o ~~~ /J.;CaA-o ~
OJ :.r'..€AACYJ /-oJJ --!o /-o.-u0 <^-'
f?./'~ A-UJ~ at'-' &
~o.-I0b ;to /J;uJ~ /2YV-J cLocJ\. HI?
Co-hoJ-;ta- Q/Yl~ 1,0/YY1~ cJ.p /COT
.hA.J'~ OJ/1 +-/-r& J ~ dJ) /LV r _bJVJ
Lv"v p.u ~ 0 01 SM~
p..J/b j'YYL€:U~ <2J~ ~
J.o..)::s;., ~ /9 B'I joM.J..-I .~
~ I-UJ/Y"'l tf-.f; eoYxJ,):::oA ·
'7A.v...ru -<.-UOJJ /!...Of a. ~. d
~ p ~ ..(.mJ ff.A./ J./JAPu /.-UlU
/ q 9 5' ,..u.J &n +f.J:, Ccv0 aJJ( aP
/JoL<L ~ p~ ~
t2JIv f-k, ~ -10 ~ ,g. M-~
-# ~ ~ k e4 * 0.-. /J7YYla..6
~ ~y- /J~ /0--0 ~#,
. "-fl?, CG\.h~ A.D ~.-G(3
1-4 -4.w. A-f- ~ t--k- ~
co~ ,~ ~~
. ---ce..o-,/-JO/L.o~~ evn.d ~
A ~o~ F4 ~/.:) . o.r.
t-4 ~.
CAt<oLYN T ~Ol(es
&:uo~~ y 5;~
S",,-v M j{L T L. -S(;) u (~ e >-
A- -{~
-
I ;~~~~nVl~~
~ APR 111997 ~
'By
-
. .
Subject: Cabalka Appeal
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 18:01:48 -0600
From: Kuester <home@kuester.com>
Reply-To: home@kuester.com
To: cityhall @shorewood.state.net
To: Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry Oneill
John Garfunkel
CC: Tom Dahlberg
RE: Cabalka
While it's apparant that Mayor Dahlberg has pre-determined that Mr.
Cabalka is entitled to prevail in this matter, we encorage you to take a
stand for the rights of property owners/residents who live and pay taxes
in the community of Shorewood and deny this appeal.
We believe it is your duty to uphold the laws of the community and do
your best to protect our property values. M.r Calbaka failed to
factually support his appeal and has mislead the city from day one on
issues regarding this matter. To allow him to continue will only
encourage those of us who live by the laws of the city, to use every
legal option to protect our rights, as we expect to be protected by
these laws as well. The council holds the responsibility to protect the
community at large, and we trust you will make the right decision as
such.
Sincerely,
Gerri Kuester
kevin Kuester
;J
r
;J
--
TO: Shorewood Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jim Hurm, City Administrator
FROM: Rolf Erickson, City Assessor
DATE: April 12, 1997
RE: Assessment and sales growth data
Attached are data sheets on 9 properties that sold and resold over the past 7 years. These
properties had no building permits taken out for major improvements and to the best of my
knowledge were not changed between sales. (One had air conditioning added, one had fireplace
added and another had a pool added between sales. I subtracted our improvement amounts from
the increase calculation.) Please note that these percentage increase amounts were not used to
make any assessment decisions and have been compiled for informational purposes only.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF
THE UNITED~TATES POSTAL SERVICE
WITHIN THE' OWNTOWN AREA OF THE
CIT . OF EXCELSIOR
WHEREAS, the City of Excelsior is one of the oldest, continuously-settled communities in the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, one of the key values of the 1850s founders of Excelsior was to have a vital
commercial center; and
WHEREAS, Excelsior has functioned for nearly a century and a half as the commercial hub of
the South Lake Minnetonka area; and
WHEREAS, during the suburbanization of the area over the past fifty years, Excelsior has
maintained its position as a vital commercial center, fulfilling the role of a downtown for a regional
population of more than 20,000 residents and the businesses who support them; and
WHEREAS, the residents and businesses of the City of Shorewood have relied on the convenience
of the downtown Excelsior Post Office as they have traveled there for shopping and business transactions;
and
WHEREAS, the United States Postal Service has communicated that a distinct possibility exists
that the Excelsior Post Office may relocate from downtown Excelsior as soon as early 1998; and
WHEREAS, the contemplated relocation of the Post Office out of downtown Excelsior would
not serve the best interest of Shorewood in that the sense of community and economic vitality of the South
Lake Minnetonka area would be affected in a negative way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that
it urges the United States Postal Service to work closely and sincerely with the owners of private property
in Excelsior as well as the City of Excelsior to maintain a post office within the downtown area of the City
of Excelsior; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shorewood declares that it
fully supports the efforts of the City of Excelsior and the Excelsior community to keep the Excelsior Post
Office in downtown Excelsior.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 14th day
of April, 1997.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATIEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
'.
~
">
1'.
Ii. .
.
1"
,~
ft. ~
:'I;,
l\.
.\
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.net/shorewood · cityhaU@shorewood.state.net
Executive Summary ,
Shorewood City Council'Meeting
Monday, April 14, 1997
fJt
Following the reconvened Board of Review at 7:00 p.m., the regular City Council meeting
will convene at 7:30 p.m.
A~enda Item #3A: As a result of the discussion with Communications Commission
Executive Director Jim Daniels at the last Council meeting, the Council directed a resolution
be prepared which amends the Cooperative Agreement to authorize them to act as an
advisory authority regarding communication issues. This resolution does that.
A~enda Item #3B: At the last meeting the Council directed staff to prepare a findings of
fact approving a conditional use permit allowing Mary Reutiman to construct a three-car,
attached garage, the area of which, when added to existing accessory space, exceeds 1,200
square feet. This resolution requires a four-fifths vote by the Council.
A~enda Item #3C: Leroy Signs, Inc. has applied for a sign permit on behalf of Driskill's
New Market (formerly Super Valu) at the Shorewood Shopping Center. The proposed
plan brings the center closer to compliance with the current zoning regulations and an
existing conditional use permit for the center's multiple signage. The Planning Director has
recommended approval, subject to the applicant obtaining a letter of approval from the
owner of the center. Approval requires a simple majority vote by the Council.
A~enda Item #3D: This action would be a motion authorizing the execution of an
agreement with McCombs, Frank Roos and Associates to perform engineering consulting
work not to exceed $3,500. This is in relation to stormwater management planning in the
southeast area, specifically near the Ron. Johnson property.
A~enda Item #3E: ,This action would be a motion to establish the second regular Council
meeting in May to be Tuesday, May 27. . This is necessitated because Monday, May 26 is
Memorial Day.
A~enda Item #3F: This motion approves an agreement with Lake Restoration Inc. for a
spring and fall inspection of Christmas Lake for Eurasian water mil':'foil. This is an annual
contract which is included in the 1997 budget. The entire cost is just under $1,600.
A~enda Item #5B: This resolution accepts the proposal of the Minnetonka Community
Education Services to run a concession trailer in the Freeman Park north parking lot this
summer and authorizes the execution of an appropriate agreement.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting of April 14, 1997
Page 2 of 2
A~enda Item #5C: Because spring is upon us, a number of items in the 1997 Capital
Improvement Program for parks need to be started. This budget resolution authorizes
capital improvements for the year 1997.
A~enda Item #5D: The Park Commission has asked that the City Council clarify and
specifically layout the expectations of the Park Commission in relation to snowmobiling.
The memorandum in the packet raises several questions that should be considered by the
Council in giving direction.
A~enda Item #6: Per Council direction, alternative resolutions have been prepared for the
Cabalka dock appeal, one approving and one denying. . As explained by the City Attorney
at the last meeting, the resolution approving the appeal requires a four-fifths vote, while the
resolution denying the appeal requires only a simple majority.
A~enda Item #7: This item will be discussed at the Council meeting in detail. Due to recent
changes, a proposal is not included in your packet.
.
~
"
.
"
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
S7SS COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DRAFT
Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, McCarty, O'Neill and Garfunkel;
Administrator Hurm; City Attorney John Dean; Planning Director Brad Nielsen;
Engineer Larry Brown.
Review Agenda
B.
Councilmember McCarty suggested moving the report on the open forum prior to
consideration of Agenda Item 7B. The agenda was accepted as amended
for March 24, 1997.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Work Session Minutes - March 10, 1997
The City Council Work Session Minutes for March 10, 1997, were approved as
submitted.
B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - March 10, 1997
McCarty moved, O'Neill seconded approving the City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes for March 10, 1997, as amended on Page 2, Item SA, change "Trettle" to
"Trettel"; Page 4, Paragraph 9, Sentence 4, change "objection" to "objective."
Motion passed 4/0. (Councilmember Stover abstained.)
C . City Council Executive Session Meeting Minutes - March 10, 1997
O'Neill moved, Garfunkel seconded approving the City Council Executive
Session Meeting Minutes for March 10, 1997, as submitted. Motion passed 4/0.
(Councilmember Stover abstained.)
D . City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes - March 12, 1997
Garfunkel moved, McCarty seconded approving the City Council Work Session
Meeting Minutes for March 12, 1997, as amended on Page S, Paragraph 3, change
"questioned" to "asked about." Motion passed 4/0. (Councilmember Stover
abstained.)
E. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes for March 14, 1997
The City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes for March 14, 1997, were
approved as submitted.
1fdf+
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 2
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Dahlberg read the Consent Agenda for March 24, 1997.
Stover moved, McCarty seconded to approve the Motions on the Consent Agenda
and to adopt the Resolutions therein:
A. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 97-19, "A Resolution
Approving the Final Plat of Larson Estates for Stephen and Lucinda
Larson, 20435 Radisson Road."
B . A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 97-20, "A Resolution
Making Appointments to the Park Foundation."
C. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 97-21, "A Resolution
Approving a 1997 Refuse Hauler's License."
Motion passed 5/0.
4. PRESENTATION BY JIM DANIELS ON LAKE
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD
MINNETONKA
.
Jim Daniels, Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Advisory Board, appeared to
address the Council. He explained the history of the Commission and noted it has been in place
for approximately 14 years. The Commission was active in working with Congressmen Ramstad
and Enge during the consideration of the Telecommunications Act which was enacted by
Congress.
Mr. Daniels explained the Commission is available and willing to act in an advisory capacity to the
Council as telecommunications progress and new technology becomes available. The Commission
has the authority to negotiate the cable contract which crosses the boundaries. of the surrounding 14
cities.
Mayor Dahlberg asked how the Council can ensure the Commission is providing advice which is
objective and well informed. Mr. Daniels stated the Commission has been acting in that capacity .
for the past several years relative to PCS and rights-of-way. He explained the Commission has
kept the Council informed on these issues.
Councilmember O'Neill asked if the Council has veto power over what will happen in Shorewood
relative to the negotiations of the cable contract. Mr. Daniels stated each city has the potential of
two full commissioners on the Board.
City Attorney Dean asked if the Commission envisions fmding itself in a conflict situation when
advising the City relative to other fonus of communication while at the same time dealing with the
cable franchise. Mr. Daniels stated he did not feel there would be any possibility of conflict given
the presence of the Telecommunications Act.
Attorney Dean inquired relative to the expenses of making investigation and noted the reference to
the expense being borne by either the Commission or the communication provider. He asked
whether an expense borne by the Commission would ultimately be borne by the member cities.
Mr. Daniels stated the Commission is financed by the franchise fee which would be used for such
things as legal proceedings. If the City would request some type of expert technical advice, that
expense would be passed on to the applicant and not the City.
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 3
Mayor Dahlberg asked if the participating cities contribute funds to the Commission or if it is
funded by the applicants. Mr. Daniels explained the Commission is funded by the franchise fees
which are derived from Triax Cable. Administrator Hurrn clarified it is funded by the users of the
cable because the cable company is still required to pay the franchise fee.
Mr. Daniels stated the Commission is not in a position to be lobbied by a cable company.
Councilmember Stover inquired whether other cities have expanded the role of the Cable
Commission as welL Mr. Daniels was not certain of this.
McCarty moved, Stover seconded directing staff to prepare a resolution amending
the Joint and Cooperative Agreement with the Lake Minnetonka Communications
Commission. Motion passed 5/0.
5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Police Chief Rick Young addressed the Council relative to the snowmobile issue. Chief Young
responded to comments which were made to the Council at the February 24, 1997, City Council
meeting. He stated he would be addressing the actions taken by the Police Department relative to
the Snowmobile Task Force recommendations.
With regard to the Task Force recommendation that one officer be trained for snowmobile patrol
with another backup officer also trained, Chief Young pointed out Shorewood has only one
officer. It would be a decision of the Coordinating Committee to detennine if an additional officer
should be assigned. In addition, arrangements have been made to have three additional officers
trained for snowmobile patrol backup.
Chief Young stated the City purchased a snowmobile and equipped it for law enforcement use as
well as equipping the Shorewood officer with the proper equipment.
With respect to South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department training on safety and
enforcement, Officer Keller trained the other officers of the department at a department meeting
prior to the start of the snowmobile season.
Chief Young stated the Snowmobile Task Force recommendation was to institute a zero tolerance
policy with respect to impounding vehicles for curfew violations and other violations where it is
appropriate. He stated there is no reference in the snowmobile report which indicates that it was
decided to implement a zero tolerance policy on all violations, but was limited to impounding
snowmobiles when legally possible.
Chief Young noted Officer Keller has coordinated the Department's efforts with the State of
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Conservation Officers and the County Sheriffs
Department Water Patrol, the County Park Rangers and the Chanhassen Public Safety Department.
An interim report was presented to the Park Commission in which Conservation Officer Mike
Hammer stated the 2.5 miles of the LRT under the Shorewood jurisdiction is the most patrolled
section of snowmobile trail in the state with respect to the number of enforcement hours spent on a
small section of trail. In addition, the DNR officers have stated the volume of violations are on
average lower on the LRT than other areas in the state.
Chief Young stated an officer was sent to DNR school to become a snowmobile safety instructor.
A snowmobile safety class conducted by that trained officer has been held for area children.
Chief Young stated the collection of data is being completed and a season end report will be
presented to the Park Commission on April 22, 1997. He stated it is impossible from a staffing
standpoint to collect data on a monthly basis.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 . PAGE 4
Chief Young explained zero tolerance could mean that all violators are stopped and enforcement
action taken. From a police officer's standpoint, an enforcement action would be a verbal
warning, a written warning, a citation or a physical arrest. He stated an officer will not take an
enforcement action which cannot be backed up in court. The issuance of citations which cannot be
substantiated in court would hurt the credibility of the Police Department Chief Young did not feel
the officers should be criticized for doing what their training and experience tells them they have to
do.
Chief Young noted when numerous complaints are made from a particular complainant, the
reported action identifies that person or location so that the actions taken as a result of that
complaint can be correctly identified. Chief Young pointed out the snowmobile laws and
ordinances have been vigorously enforced in the City of Shore wood.
Mayor Dahlberg asked under what circumstances a snowmobile would be impounded. Chief
Young stated the main reason would be when it is impossible for the snowmobile to be legally
driven further such as with drunk driving or curfew violations. The report at the conclusion of the
season will reflect the number of machines which were impounded this season. Chief Young
stated one machine which was impounded will not be allowed to be retrieved due to drug .
involvement.
Mayor Dahlberg questioned whether Chief Young was aware the Snowmobile Club feels the
signage on the trail needs to be enlarged. Chief Young was unaware of this and felt it should be
discussed at the Park Commission meeting during consideration of this issue.
Councilmember Stover stated the Council did take action following the Task Force
recommendation which resulted in some adjustment to the recommendations. She pointed out the
Council implemented a 100 percent zero tolerance. Councilmember McCarty also noted this to be
the case.
Chief Young stated the Police Department would need to be given an explanation of what the
Council's intent is with regard to zero tolerance. Councilmember Stover felt the Council's intent
was to find whether the laws and regulations could be enforced to the maximum extent possible.
Mayor Dahlberg felt progress was being made in resolving misunderstandings relative to what had ..
been agreed upon and that this would help future efforts. Councilmember McCarty expressed
appreciation for the efforts of the Police Department relative to snowmobile enforcement.
6 . PARKS . Report by Commissioner Sandy Trettel
In the absence of Commissioner Sandy Trettel, Councilmember McCarty reported on the matters
considered at the March 11, 1997, work session meeting of the Park Commission (as detailed in
the minutes of that meeting).
7. PLANNING . Report by Representative
Commissioner Kolstad reported on the matters considered and actions taken at the March 4, 1997,
meeting of the Planning Commission, as well as the March 18, 1997, work session of the
Planning Commission (as detailed in the minutes of those meetings).
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 5
A . A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact Regarding
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space in Excess of 1,200
Square Feet
Applicant:
Location:
Mary Reutiman
5965 Eureka Road
Stover moved, McCarty seconded directing staff to prepare a Findings
approving a Conditional Use Permit for accessory space in excess
square feet for Mary Reutiman, 5965 Eureka Road, subject
recommendations. Motion passed 5/0.
of Fact
of 1,200
to staff
REPORT ON OPEN FORUM
Mayor Dahlberg explained an open forum had been held prior to the Council meeting to give the
Council a chance to discuss with concerned residents the request for an amendment to the
Waterford PUD Development Agreement to allow on-site alcohol beverage at the Waterford
Shopping Center.
.
The Council expressed their appreciation to the residents who attended the open forum.
Councilmember Stover suggested recapping the discussions which were held.
Mayor Dahlberg explained the nature of the request being made by Mr. Velikson and noted the
residents who attended the forum were opposed to an amendment to the PUD Development
Agreement.
.
Councilmember Stover noted there had been discussions that if something. were discovered during
the meeting which had not become known at the public hearing, this information would be brought
to the attention of the Planning Commission. She felt the issues which were discussed during the
meeting were already a part of the public record. She noted the discussion centered around the
concept of PUD's as well as the difficulty with intersections which are not patrolled as often as
they previously had been. Councilmember Stover did not feel any new information had been
brought forward.
Councilmember O'Neill suggested anyone in attendance who would like to put their comments on
the record should feel free to do so.
B. A Motion Regarding Amendment to the Waterford PUD Development
Agreement to Allow On-site Alcohol Beverage
Vladimir Velikson
19905 State Highway 7 (Waterford
Shopping Center
Mayor Dahlberg noted the applicant, Vladimir Velikson, was not in attendance. Councilmember
McCarty felt after speaking with the residents that a promise had been made to the neighborhood
and she felt it was the duty of the Council to keep that agreement. She wants this to be a
community which stands by its promises and stated she would vote against this request.
Applicant:
Location:
Councilmember Garfunkel was in agreement and felt the City needs to develop a reputation ofskeeping its contracts.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 6
Councilmember Stover explained the Waterford PUD took a number of years to develop. She felt
the Council should honor its contracts. Councilmember Stover noted the developer could have
applied for commercial and residential zoning at the time of the development and the developer
chose to apply for a PUD with the full knowledge there were many restrictions involved. She
recalled there had been considerable citizen input at that time and a compromise was reached
between the developer and the City. She stated she would not vote in favor of this request.
Councilmember O'Neill was in agreement with the other councilmembers and felt if an amendment
were to be made, there would be additional requests for further amendments. He expressed his
appreciation to the citizens who appeared at the open forum.
Mayor Dahlberg stated there may be agreement there should be a restaurant of this type in
Shorewood, yet there is an argument that the PUD covenant should not be changed. He felt the
residents of Shorewood want consistency and are opposed -to changes in contracts such as these
covenants.
Stover moved, McCarty seconded approving RESOLUTION NO. 97-22, "A
Resolution Denying an Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement
for Waterford Phase III." Motion passed 5/0. .
8. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS
Mayor Dahlberg inquired as to constitutional issues relative to this matter. Attorney Dean stated
this is a difficult area, fraught with a potential for litigation, however, the City has a legal authority
to adopt a moratorium relative to adult establishments.
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded adopting an ordinance establishing a
moratorium on adult establishments. Motion passed 5/0.
9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT THE COMMUNICATIONS
PLAN
Administrator Hurm explained the proposed Communications Plan. Mayor Dahlberg remarked the
Council has held a number of work sessions to develop a Communication Plan which will increase .
communications between the City and the citizens of Shorewood.
Mayor Dahlberg noted he has received positive feedback relative to the new format being used with
the monthly newsletter. He expressed his appreciation to Councilmember Garfunkel and City staff
for the time and effort which has been dedicated to the establishment of this plan.
Administrator Hurm felt the measurement of effectiveness is still a weak area and felt measures
could be established as the plan progresses. Mayor Dahlberg remarked . that Planning
Commissioner Turgeon has raised several valid points relative to the measurement of effectiveness
which need to be addressed.
Councilmember McCarty was encouraged to see a plan being put into effect and remarked in the
two years she has been on the Council, there has been a concern relative to improved
communications. She stated this must be a cooperative effort with the citizens of the City and
citizens must take responsibility to work with the Council on this issue.
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 7
Councilmember Stover felt the Council has always attempted to communicate as much as possible.
She felt the City should focus on offering classes to residents and inquired how many students
would be required before the City would hold the class. Hurm suggested developing a rapport
with the various neighborhood groups through which there may be people interested in the class.
Councilmember Stover expressed a desire to participate in those discussions. She suggested if the
City should decide to focus in on certain aspects of the plan, the major focus should be on citywide
issues as opposed to concentrating on less population type issues.
Councilmember O'Neill was concerned with the cost associated with the number of proposed
mailings in the plan and felt in certain situations a sign may be more cost effective. Administrator
Hurm commented it is the intent to have a report which would come early on to the Council
identifying the ways in which staff would suggest an approach to a particular project.
Councilmembers Stover and McCarty noted their agreement and concern relative to the number of
mailings which are proposed throughout the plan. Councilmember Stover raised a concern relative
to overkill to the point where the plan becomes ineffective.
Councilmember O'Neill expressed appreciation to Planning Director Nielsen relative to the map
which was included in the newsletter.
Hurm suggested when a communication strategy is being contemplated the Council be consulted
relative to questions or suggestions they may have.
Councilmember O'Neill would like there to be some mention in the newsletter of the Home Page
which would encourage residents to utilize this option.
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded adopting to the Communications Plan.
Motion passed 5/0.
Mayor Dahlberg recessed the meeting at 9:33 p.m. and reconvened at 9:42 p.m.
10. A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE OF TWO DUMP TRUCKS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
Mayor Dahlberg questioned whether this is a purchase which must be made this year. He stated
there is a potentially tight budget over the next couple of months.
Councilmember Stover stated over the years due to' Council's conservative spending, the trucks
were found severely outdated and the Council was struggling to attempt to upgrade the trucks. At
that point, the Capital Improvement Plan was equipped with a method by which to keep the trucks
as current as possible. Over the years it has become less expensive to replace trucks rather than
repair them. This program has kept the expense on a consistent level. Councilmember Stover
stated she would highly recommend staying with this program.
Councilmember McCarty noted the expense would increase after April 1 due to the addition of anti-
lock brakes. Engineer Brown stated serious consideration is given to the purchases. He further
stated it is extremely important the trucks be maintained in top condition for safety considerations.
Councilmember Garfunkel noted anti-lock brakes are a safety feature and asked if they are
considered a non-cost effective safety feature. Brown stated truckers have commented that due to
the amount of weight they are carrying, their stopping distance is increased. He was unaware of
any data on this issue. He noted this issue is in constant debate.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 8
Hurm stated the funds have been budgeted and it is important to keep the integrity of funds such as
this even in a tight budget year and to not use the funds for other purposes.
Brown noted lease programs were considered, however, this was determined to be an expensive
route to follow. It is expected the lease option would cost approximately $4,500 to $5,000 more
than purchasing the trucks.
Mayor Dahlberg asked about the maintenance which would be covered by the leasing company.
Brown stated the leasing company will pay for major items of repair, but not standard
maintenance. Hurm remarked the City would be borrowing the money from the general fund and
paying it back at 5 percent interest.
Councilmember O'Neill questioned the accessories and asked whether these could be reused from
the old trucks. Brown stated the lights are built into the box and the trade-in value assumes the
options, excluding the radios, will remain on. the truck. Brown stated the radios will be used in the
sweeper and one other vehicle. Brown pointed out $72,000 per truck had been budgeted for this
purchase.
McCarty moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 97-23, "A .
Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Two Dump Trucks for the Public Works .
Department. " Motion passed 5/0.
11. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
A . Staff Report on Development Monitoring
Nielsen stated road restrictions are in effect and there has not been much activity. Mayor Dahlberg
and Brad Nielsen met with Greg Larson relative to monitoring of the development particularly with
respect to tree preservation and wetland protection as well as a plan for reporting.
B. Planner's Report on Watten House Demolition
Nielsen noted this issue was addressed at the previous meeting. The developer has been doing a
good job with tree protection and not removing trees which have been identified to be saved.
C.
Engineer's Report on InspectionlRepair of Southeast Well
.
Engineer Brown stated it has been seven years since inspection of the well. Once antenna
construction is completed on the water tower, the well will be pulled, a rental well installed and lab
work completed on the well at that time. Residents will not be affected by this work since the
water tower will be full prior to the work being undertaken.
D . Christmas Lake Boat Access
Engineer Brown stated he met with the Christmas Lake Association along with Mayor Dahlberg.
The Association requested the placement of a gate across the boat access due to theft of equipment
from docks and boats from people utilizing the lake late into the evening. Brown noted further
input is necessary from the DNR to determine whether it is consistent with their requirements.
Input will also be sought from the neighborhood associations. Mayor Dahlberg noted the
agreement calls for the closing of the access at 10:00 p.m. in an effort to discourage criminal
activity.
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 - PAGE 9
Mayor Dahlberg noted concern which was raised relative to. the installation of the cellular antenna
on the water tower. There is a concern the construction of the antenna appears as if the rack would
allow for installation of microwave repeating stations. The resident commented this would not be a
desirable situation.
Brown stated the concern was relative to the amount of power being transmitted at the site and
whether it is a microwave as well as a repeater site. Brown stated it is not considered a repeater
site, but simply a transmitter site.
The resident expressed concern relative to enormous amounts of power drawn through the site and
whether it would affect the water in the tower. Brown stated it is a very low power system and not
in proximity to affect the water system. Since the parts are grounded, there would not be any
chance of electrical interference being transmitted through the w~ter system. It is not in the range
of a microwave transmission.
Mayor Dahlberg inquired whether the contract guarantees the vendor will not be permitted to install
a microwave repeater on the tower. Brown stated the contract prohibits the use of microwave
repeaters. The City has the ability to inspect the equipment at any time to ensure additions have not
been made which were not included in the original agreement. Nielsen stated the Conditional Use
Permit specifies the City has control over the style and type of antennas and specifically precludes
dish-type antennas.
Administrator Hurm reported an invitation has been received from the Fire Chief to attend a special
demonstration of the Cairns Iris Unit. The demonstration is scheduled for Thursday, March 27,
1997, at 7:30 p.m. at the Excelsior Fire Station.
12. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Report on Open Forum
This item was considered prior to consideration of Agenda Item 7B.
Councilmember O'Neill commented on the April 2, 1997, Board of Review. He stated he would
like something from the assessor prior to the meeting relative to a historical breakdown of the
values in the city and information relative to the current property tax increases. Hurm will supply
the report as soon as possible.
Mayor Dahlberg also commented on the increase in property values. He expressed concern relative
to residents on fixed incomes dealing with increased property taxes.
Councilmember O'Neill asked if the Council would be in favor of sponsoring a contest to name the
newsletter. Councilmember Stover suggested a contest for school age children. Councilmember
O'Neill suggested a small monetary prize and that the contest be open to children in Shorewood.
Council was in agreement with this suggestion.
Councilmember O'Neill would like staff to provide information relative to land which is available
to be subdivided within Shorewood. Councilmember Stover cautioned to be careful in suggesting
a moratorium. Councilmember O'Neill stated he would not want to infringe on anyone's rights.
Mayor Dahlberg reported he has been subpoenaed to testify on the Bache case.
Mayor Dahlberg reported a summit meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 10th at 6:00 p.m.
with several mayors and interested councilmembers to discuss the South Lake Stormwater
Management Plan.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1997 . PAGE 10
Mayor Dahlberg stated Mr. Rollie Peterson would like to meet with City staff as soon as possible
to discuss the stormwater situation in Harding Acres.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Stover moved, McCarty seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:37 p.m. subject to
the approval of claims. Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
TOI\1:-DAHLBERG;MAY<fR"---
-----------------------------------------
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
..
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 31, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFt
Mayor Dahlberg called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill and Garfunkel; Administrator
Hurm; City Attorney John Dean.
Councilmember McCarty
Absent:
.
B . Review Agenda
2.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF CABALKA REQUEST AND
PROCEDURAL REVIEW
.
Mr. Cabalka stated he did not receive notice of this meeting until March 29th. Mayor Dahlberg
noted Mr. Kelly, the Cabalkas' attorney had been present at the prior meetings when this date had
been established and inquired whether the Cabalkas felt prepared to proceed without the presence
of their attorney. Mr. Cabalka stated he was prepared to proceed.
Planning Director Nielsen reviewed the history surrounding the Cabalkas' request. A complaint
was made to the City alleging the dockage on the Scott Cabalka property had been increased.
Upon a review of the site, staff reviewed a letter from Mr. Cabalka expressing his desire to build a
dock on this smaller, unbuildable lot as well as a 1981 survey which did not reflect a dock on the
parcel in question. Based on this information, the City sent a Zoning Violation Notice to the
Cabalkas requesting the dock be removed since it was in violation of City code. The Cabalkas
appealed that notice and provided information to the contrary to the City.
Planning Commission public hearings were held at which time the Cabalkas presented evidence the
dock existed. There were also letters from area residents to the contrary. The Planning
Commission ultimately recommended denial of the Cabalkas' request.
The Council then directed staff to review aerial photographs and report back. At that time staff was
directed to prepare a Findings of Fact denying the appeal. Subsequently, the current Council
reviewed the matter in January, 1997 at which time the matter was tabled for further review at a
study session.
Mayor Dahlberg asked if the Findings were based on aerial photography or other evidence.
Nielsen read the Findings of Fact which were drafted at that time denying the appeal.
Mayor Dahlberg clarified the ordinance would require the Council to find the dock was in existence
after 1965 and asked what information was uncovered by staff. Nielsen note the Council has
evidence on both sides of the issue. He stated a review of aerial photos at the University of
Minnesota revealed a dock fIrst appears in photos taken in April of 1985. Mayor Dahlberg felt the
aerial photography was on a scale which makes it difficult to discern anything.
:/Pd.D
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 31, 1997 - PAGE 2
Mayor Dahlberg inquired of Attorney Dean if the Council is to determine whether or not the
Cabalkas were in violation of an ordinance. Attorney Dean stated the specific issue before the
Council will be determining whether or not the dock was in existence and in continuous use since
January of 1965.
Mayor Dahlberg asked where the burden of proof would lie in this situation. Attorney Dean
explained if the Council decides to go forward with an enforcement action, the Court would expect
the City to establish facts giving rise to the claim the dock is not entitled to nonconforming use
status. (Agenda Item 5 was discussed at this time)
3. REVIEW OF ISSUES AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mayor Dahlberg noted none of the original complaints were made relative to the dock not being
there, but rather that the dock had changed shape. It was City staff who had determined the dock
had not been in existence. Mayor Dahlberg asked for an explanation of the process followed once
the City receives a complaint.
Nielsen explained once a complaint is received, the City investigates the complaint to determine the .
circumstances of the case. Initially staff looked to see if there was anything which would show
what the dock had looked like before. This investigation revealed a survey which suggested the
dock had not existed as of 1981. There was a letter along with the survey in which Mr. Cabalka
explained he intended to build a dock in this area. Based on that information, staff sent the Zoning
Violation Notice.
Councilmember Garfunkel requested an explanation of the grandfather clause. Attorney Dean
explained it is contingent on continuous use and can be transferred from property owner to
property owner so that a change in ownership would not severe the nonconforming use status. (At
this time, Agenda Item 5 was revisited.)
Councilmember Stover felt the Council was overlooking the provision that the dock must have
remained in continuous use since 1965. If the dock was not in continuous use since that date, the
grandfathering provision would have been violated.
Councilmember Garfunkel asked when the grandfather clause would cease and ifit would be
contingent on the Cabalkas retaining the property. Attorney Dean stated the dock must be in
continuous use which could include many changes in ownership.
Councilmember O'Neill inquired of the Cabalkas when their property had been sold. Mr. Cabalka
stated on July 3, 1988, the third parcel of property containing the homestead was sold to Mr.
Hillius.
.
Mr. Cabalka referenced a survey which he has on fIle. He stated in approximately 1981, the
Planning Commission was contacted and Mr. Cabalka inquired whether another home could be
built on the property as a retirement home. At that time he stated he was interested in building a
home with a dock. On June 6, 1981, the Planning Commission met with Mr. Cabalka at the site.
At that time a survey was obtained. Mr. Cabalka stated a dock was indicated. on the survey.
Mr. Cabalka stated a dock has always been in existence. He stated the Planning Commission in
1981 was responsible for the survey which reflects a dock. He stated members of the Commission
were at the property to view the site and the minutes reflect his intention to build a dock.
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 31, 1997 - PAGE 3
Councilmember Stover recalled meeting at the site on June 6, 1981 relative to Mr. Cabalka's
request. She stated the minutes did not reflect the existence of the dock because there was not a
dock there the day of the visit. The discussion centered around where the dock might be located if
the building were to occur. Mr. Cabalka stated the dock was not visible because it was knocked
down due to problems with poachers. He further noted the existing dock is not visible from the
road due to weed cover.
Councilmember Stover stated there were discussions relative to moving the lot line as well as
discussions where a second dock would be located. The only dock at that time was located at the
Cabalkas' primary residence.
Councilmember O'Neill stated there is another issue to be considered which is that the original
complaint raises the issue that the dock, if it were conforming, cannot change shape.
Mayor Dahlberg clarified the single issue before the Council is to decide whether or not the dock
was in place continuously or not. Once that is determined, the issue of the change in shape could
be addressed.
.
Councilmember O'Neill questioned when the Cabalkas sold the third piece of property and the
house. Mr. Cabalka stated the Purchase Agreement is dated July 3, 1985. Mr. Cabalka
maintained a dock has always been in existence in varying forms.
Attorney Dean inquired as to the ordinance relative to nonconforming uses. Nielsen explained the
time requirement for nonconforming continuous use is 90 days, but with respect to docks, the time
requirement would be season to season.
Councilmember O'Neill stated the existence of the dock was not the original complaint and he
inquired why the existence. of the dock comes into question as. opposed to the initial complaint.
Nielsen explained when staff investigated the complaint, the first consideration was whether the
dock had the right to be there and, if so, had it been expanded. Nielsen had determined between
the survey and the letter from the Cabalkas that as of 1981 the dock did not exist.
4. PRESENTATIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
.
Mayor Dahlberg noted there are a number of letters on fIle for and against the request of the
Cabalkas.
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 31, 1997 - PAGE 4
Mr. Benson stated this has become a very contentious matter and that comments have been made
through various letters. Mr. Benson stated the dock appeared in 1985 at the time Mr. Cabalka
moved out of the home on Christmas Lake Road. Mr. Benson stated he had shared in the
ownership of the weed cutter and would often times obtain it from the Mr. Cabalka's dock which
was the dock located on the lot containing Mr. Cabalka's home which is now the Kuester property.
Mr. Benson explained that over the years other similar requests have been denied. His recollection
of the Planning Commission's consideration of the dock was that the Commission recommended
denial. The Council at that time chose to not move forward because of a threatened lawsuit.
Mr. Benson feels his property rights are weakened and he is suffering a loss in his property value
by allowing this nonconforming use to continue. He requested the Councilrecognize.this as
protecting the property values and property rights of the people who are adjacent to this property.
Mayor Dahlberg felt this issue raises social policy issues. He stated the focus of the Council must
center on whether or not the dock was in continuous use.
Councilmember Stover commented there are small lots on Lake Minnetonka which have increased
in value due to the addition of a dock. There are also unbuildable lots on Lake Minnetonka which .
have in the past been denied the right to put a dock on an unbuildable piece of land. If the original .
complaint was that the dock and existing dock on an unbuildable lot enlarged, the City would be
irresponsible in not investigating it further.
Mr. Benson stated he is asserting his rights as a property owner and did not feel he was raising a
social issue. He noted there is an ordinance in effect which controls the issuance of
nonconforming docks.
Mike Pierro, 5880 Christmas Lake Road, inquired who actually owns the property. Mayor
Dahlberg noted the deedholder is Scott Cabalka. Mr. Cabalka stated three children own it with the
oldest of the three holding the deed.
With respect to the terms "continuous use" and "useable," Mr. Pierro asked for an explanation of
these terms. He also asked about the reference made to the dock being under water. Attorney
Dean stated continuous use would depend on whether the dock is used to the extent a dock would
normally be expected to be used.
.
Mr. Pierro stated he was asked to fix the weed cutter in the mid 70's. He did not know if the dock
had been in existence in the 50's and 60's, however, he recalled there was not a useable dock in
existence prior to the sale of the main property. He was unaware of whether there was one under
the water or not. Mr. Pierro did not feel a wood dock would last that length of time without repair.
He was opposed to nonresidential use of a dock in this area.
Mr. Cabalka stated in 1981 he did add a dock made of aluminum pipe. This dock was built beside
the original dock which remains in place. He recalled in 1981 when the Council was considering
the issue of changing his property line and his request to build on the smaller lot, Councilmember
Tad Shaw assured the other councilmembers three separate times the subject dock would be
grandfathered.
Mayor Dahlberg noted there appears to be substantial evidence the dock was in existence in the
1950's and then from 1984 on. It is unclear in the late 60's and throughout the 70's whether a
dock was in place. Mr. Cabalka stated in approximately 1974 Mr. Chaney utilized the dock. In
addition, Mr. Cabalka stated he held science club parties at the dock.
"
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 31, 1997 - PAGE 5
Mr. Cabalka stated he is on the site daily with the exception of the month of February. He stated
he and his wife are the principle users of the property which they have utilized in a quiet manner
for ~pproximately 40 years. Mr. Cabalka felt that he has been harassed on this issue time and
agam.
5. DISCUSSION OF BURDEN OF PROOF
Mayor Dahlberg stated his understanding the Council is sitting in judgment of a Finding of Fact
and that it is the responsibility of the Council to determine whether or not the dock was in existence
in conformance with the grandfather clause. If it was not, then the dock would be determined to be
in violation of the ordinance. At that point, it would be the City's burden to prove that the dock
was not there.
.
Attorney Dean pointed out if there is a violation, it would be. that there is a dock existing on a parcel
of land which does not contain a primary structure. Councilmember O'Neill stated there would be
other issues as well. (Agenda Item 3 was considered at this time.)
Councilmember O'Neill inquired relative to the burden of proof at this point as well as if a Court
action were to ensue.
Attorney Dean stated the Council is seeking to make Findings relative to the status of the dock. To
make those determinations, the Council needs information supplied from any source wishing to
supply that information. The Council then reviews the information and makes a decision.
If the obligation is to prove the dock was there, the Council must be satisfied by looking at all of
the evidence that the dock was there. Attorney Dean urged the Council to consider the information
and evidence before them as well as the public testimony in order to reach a decision. He
explained there is no case law in Minnesota relative to who carries the burden in this situation.
(Agenda Item 3 was revisited at this time.)
6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON HOW TO PROCEED
.
Councilmember O'Neill was disturbed he had not seen pictures which reflect the two docks which
were existing prior to the sale of the house. He felt with recreational activities which occur on a
dock, there would be pictures available depicting the two docks.
Mayor Dahlberg stated one issue to consider would be how in principle the Cabalkas could prove
the dock had been in continuous use since 1965. The ordinance is lacking a process which would
require evidence be placed on file on a yearly basis.
Attorney Dean pointed out a four-fIfths vote would be necessary to allow the dock to remain in
existence.
Councilmember O'Neill inquired as to the actions of the previous Council on this matter.
Councilmember Stover explained the Council had directed staff to prepare a Findings of Fact
denying the appeal. At the time of the vote, Mr. Kelly, the Cabalka's attorney, requested the
matter be tabled until June which would allow the Cabalkas sufficient time to have testing
completed which would indicate how long the dock had been in existence.
Attorney Dean suggested the Council may wish to direct staff to prepare Findings approving Mr.
Cabalka's request so that at a subsequent meeting the Council would have both sets of Findings
available to consider.
'"
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 31, 1997 - PAGE 6
Councilmember Stover inquired what would happen to the two sets of Findings of Fact in the
event of a court action. Attorney Dean stated the approved Findings of Fact would become
evidence of the Council's action and the other set of Findings of Fact rejected.
Administrator Hurm pointed out the Findings of Fact would be the same for both sides of the
issue, however, the Conclusion is the portion which would be different.
Mayor Dahlberg moved directing staff to prepare a Findings of Fact approving the
request of James Cabalka, 58XX Christmas Lake Road. Motion failed for lack of
a second.
Councilmember Stover suggested that assuming the resolution does not pass, at that time, staff
could be directed to prepare the alternate Findings of Fact. She noted Mr. Kelly had requested the
matter be tabled until June. Mr. Cabalka stated this was offered as an alternative to the Council
who wanted additional information. Mayor Dahlberg felt the matter should move along and a final
decision made.
Mayor Dahlberg moved, O'Neill seconded directing staff to prepare a Findings of
Fact approving the request of James Cabalka, 58XX Christmas Lake Road. .
Motion passed 3/1. (Councilmember Stover was the dissenting vote.)
It was the consensus of the Council to move forward on this matter and requested it be added to the
next agenda.
Councilmember Garfunkel stated he felt all of the information had been presented and did not feel
there to be a need for further testimony on this matter. Mr. Cabalka did not feel there was further
information to be presented.
Attorney Dean recommended allowing Attorney Kelly a period of time in which to submit a final
letter regarding this matter.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded to adjourn the City Council Special Meeting
to a closed Executive Session at 10:06 p.m. Motion passed 4/0.
.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
MONDA Y, MARCH 31, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXECUTIVE SESSION
FOLLOWING SPECIAL
MEETING
MINUTES
EXECUTIVE SESSION
DRAFT
1 . Mayor Dahlberg opened the meeting at 10: 19 p.m.
Present:
Mayor Dahlberg; Councilmembers Stover, O'Neill and Garfunkel; City
Administrator Hurm; City Attorney Dean; City Engineer Brown; and
Planning Director Nielsen.
Councilmember McCarty
Absent:
2. DISCUSSION OF LITIGATION MATTERS
.
The current status of the case of the Ron and Dee Johnson case was reviewed by the City
Attorney. Options and strategies were discussed.
Garfunkel moved, O'Neill seconded, to authorize an expenditure of up to
$3,500 for consulting engineering work with McCombs, Frank Roos, and
Associates for the purpose of evaluating drainage problems in the area of
the Johnson property. The authorization is contingent upon execution of an
agreement between the City and the Johnsons limiting the future use of
information developed as a result of such consulting engineer work.
Motion passed unanimously.
John Dean recommended that this motion be placed on the next Council agenda, the
consent calendar, to be reaffirmed in open session.
3. ADJOURN
.
There being no further business, O'Neill moved, Stover seconded, to adjourn the
meeting at 12:48 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED.
James C. Hurm,
City Administrator
ATTEST:
TOM DAHLBERG, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
:ft~C-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is a member of the Lake Minnetonka
Communications Commission and has duly adopted the Joint and Cooperative Agreement creating
the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to modify said Agreement as relating to the Commission's
advisory authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood as
follows:
1. That Article I. shall be amended as follows:
.
I.
PURPOSE
The general purpose of this agreement is to establish an organization to study, prepare,
adopt, grant, administer and enforce a single non-exclusive cable communications franchise and
establish rates thereunder, in member cities in the Lake Minnetonka Suburban communities of
Hennepin County, Minnesota and to advise and provide recommendations to the member cities
regarding communication matters which may affect the member cities. In order to carry out the
purpose of this Agreement, the parties shall appoint a commission which shall be representative of
all members.
2. That Article II. shall be amended as follows:
.
II.
NAME
The organization created by this agreement shall be known as the "Lake Minnetonka GaBle-
Communications Commission" (hereinafter "Commission").
3. That Article VIII., Section 6., by deleting said Section and replacing it with the
following:
Section 6. Advisory Authority: Investigation and Recommendations. It may
investigate such matters or concerns regarding communications and/or the regulation of
communication services or the use of rights-of-way within the member citi~s to provide such
services which ~ect the member cities. and provide advice and recommendations relating thereto.
The expense of J'lking such investigations and providing any such advice and recommendations
shall be borne by the Co~s~ion. or the relevant communications provider. to the extent provided
by law.
4. That Article VIII., Section 9., shall be amended as follows:
Section 9. Advisory Bodies. It may appoint advisory bodies to make
recommendations to it on eaBle-communication matters.
4t3A
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 97-_
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR ADDmONAL ACCESSORY SPACE
TO MARY REUTIMAN
WHEREAS, Mary Reutiman (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 5965
Eureka Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
.
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the
construction of an attached garage, the area of which, when added to the area of existing
accessory space on the property, will bring the total area of accessory space on the property up to
1573 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for the
construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated
27 February 1997, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 4 March 1997, the minutes of
which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
. WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular
meeting on 24 March 1997, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the
Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City
staff
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the applicant proposes to demolish an existing detached, two-car garage
currently located on the property.
2.
property.
That an existing nonconforming pool house structure is located at the rear of the
3. B~
.
.
3. That the total proposed accessory space (1573 square feet) does not exceed the
floor area above grade of the principal structure (2824 square feet).
4. That the total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot
area for the R-IA zoning district in which it is located (4000 square feet).
5. That the design and materials of the proposed attached garage are consistent with
the architectural character of the existing home.
6. That the proposed attached garage complies with all setback requirements for the
R-IA district
CONCLUSION
A. That the application of Mary Reutiman for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth
herein above be and hereby is granted.
B. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide the
Applicant with a certified copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or
Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOl) this 14th day of
April 1997.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm
City Administrator/Clerk
-2-
,..
.
.
.,
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD - SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 -(612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128 - www.state.neUshorewood · cityhaU@shorewood.state.net
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
10 April 1997
Sign Permit - Driskill's New Market
405(Sign Permits)
Leroy Signs, Inc. has applied for a sign permit on behalf of Driskill's New Market
(formerly Super Valu).They propose to remove the existing Super Valu lettering, leaving
the Driskill's lettering and adding a New Market signllogo over the.existing exterior
entrance (see attached exhibits). Total signage for the grocery store is being reduced from
199.5 square feet to 171 square feet of area.
The Shore wood Shopping Center signage is subject to a conditional use permit which was
granted in 1987. The C.U.P. approval for multiple signage was based upon an overall
sign plan for the center which was prepared by the property managers. The plan called for
uniform lettering within a two-foot high sign band across the top of the building facade.
The plan anticipated different signage for the anchor tenants (Le. Super Valu, Snyder's,
and True Value). At the time, only interior mall tenant signage was being changed. It was
noted that the total amount of signage remaining to be divided between the anchors was
approximately 350 square feet. The total area of signage for the anchors was in excess of
what is allowed. The City agreed to allow the shopping center owner to determine how the
350 square feet to be divided in the future, and that as future sign requests were received
that the anchor signage would be brought into conformity with the overall plan.
The total area of Driskill's signage is being reduced by 28.5 square feet, bringing the center
closer to conformity with the Shorewood Zoning Code. While it is assumed that the owner
of the center has approved the proposed signage, we have not received any indication that
the owner has approved the plan.
It is recommended that the sign permit be approved, subject to the applicant submitting a
"letter from the current owner of the center stating that he understands that the other two
anchor tenants are limited in the future to a total sign area (between them) of 179 square
feet.
cc: Jiin Hurm
John Dean
Kaj Reiter- Leroy Signs
3~C,
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
MAU~2U-97 THU 09:44
.. _.J_
TOWLE REAL ESTATE
-------._-~..._.._.-........ ..
C4
...
..-,
.~f
~,
....
'-
')::)
c\'t
-
.....
~
.
Ii
~~
!
.a ~
1i:f!1
~o
\j
'f':s
'-'\
~
. "-.,.
"
~.
('1
C.
~
~"l>
:E
~
~\
\i\
~. .,~
Ii) ~
] to(
o
t
FAX NO. 6128320733
P.01
~"''''':'---'-----'*-
~,.. "--. . ~'~~,'
.--- ........-.
- ~~
. '".-,
--+-
-- :"y--
..- - -j., - .....~.".
;t~~- ~:
..L Wi~l ~
i -rr'~ -=ji \
I .~~t . \'\<1
. I . = .lie? .. ~><..
O--'r ,H_ '*"'" .~
- fF.:..... "c';. ~'\ \.-
::: '. i I ;-, ,,;::;=='='rr ,'~- ..:.::...:.-, " ,,:,,~>, ,\ ~:j
"" ' / : II '.- J~.. _:~:J J" ~
. i==--:=~_ l
'J\
tJ.
.~
. .\
:t:
II -- "'--'
I .....,.........._
1" ...-. ....j A....:: --
",:' I -.. . ....--:-
J:, .. J :u.-_ -.---.
"~'., --_......
j --. .....
1_-- .--.-
...- ,--.._..
. ,., ~ ....__...l...
,.....-. .--..---
!~
"'- ----
,_....,-
.-..- ..........-
- ..---~
1',-, ..-
__,l___
. '-......-..--
"1'
I
t'
,1.
J
~~~Q
z8z~
?"")>!;j
~;oO
z~::;:lO
V. f"l() ~
ll1 m m'"
t;~h:a:
'-"!!)Zi:
"'-rtj..,
~l'O,"
(/) t\
o ~
~ 'i
:r 1'>
~
<Ill
i", ^
"':1:
;g~
mill
<.I> 1.1
g~
z.
-, g
;jc;
m2
~)o
~I
~ f'
zQ
>=::
Q
"'
",.
o
""
'1, ~
l', n
i:,; ft'
if)
.:0
;~
.~
.. ~"l
; rJ1
z~
~Ct.
,. (J.
.. ....
~. I.)
I::' W
,: tJ
I.> '"
(t 0
"I .....
'" ~)
,.. (.J
~-~ C".
--~-~'" r~
~~
\-.\ (/'J""",\~.
~- ~~. " .r:'"~~~
c:.....' ~->
~.- .,
~ ;..'
-t) ~ (~
.........\ r~
"
'I ;
~
r;
~
t-)
."
~
.....
~
fh
(.J
t1l
1)
~
P.n~-~U-~i IMU Ud'~O 10WLt KtHL C~,Hlt
l'iAR 18 '97 14:..11 LEROY SIGNS, INC.
I" ~i\ NU. 0 kt'jc:tJ ( j,i
1". U':::
Z
m
~
!:
Q
"
~
fj)
-
-
~
co
...,
c
in
o
~
-CIl
)>
i:
" "J
.~-
i" ~
..
.
I' .~-.-.
I -"" ~,,,,,..~ ''',
1 """ \
", ......./ \
I - \
C) i
...
,. I
" \
",
, '. f) l
, f
, I
'.
.~
:
I
"
"",
",
.........
L
.' ,
.,.'" ,,/
.-- ,,-'-- (,,, __..J
..../ /'" /.
". r "f
/' . ~/ ,
I (( lrl~n,J
I \, i
I ." .....
< JIll ".... ....,.... ''''... ...........
1"'i t=i ", .... /7r- ,
m % .......... ....:!" -_I
~ t ........... . \ '.....~.. ...........
U " '>~SJ
z ~ ,...... ...~..... ~
~ ~" .." ......'.
';. ~ . ". 1:':- 'j
~ ~ .....,,'- L ..... -'
Z'" 1 '1 ...............,.....
)> ~ I f.....;. )
~ ! J ,.... .....
;to r"" ,,010'
1 .-...-'.
C-"
,'==1] I
( . ........ I
. ,,/..\~.,,/
- -~-,-.,
L...._ _I
,I' "
/ ",
;l/.. '...."',.....1
, ...
r; r~ i
;._.J \_) 1..-....,
i"-'~ I
L-.... - i I
\_,
".
",
'\
I
J
./
.--'
"''-1",...
20-00
z8Z~
)>...)>lfj
.~ ~ ~ ;0
ZZ-nlft
....QQ~
~)>n'"
<..><....!:!l
....Z~~
em",
....'10
n
~ 0
e ~
... "D
:t ~
..c
,
'.
"
",
",
'''...
.
'.
'.
".
-'.
-".
'-.
........
~
~
1"'.........
\.. "
......, '.....
......
.. ""...
..........x .........
"',
".
,
,.
""
.,
"
'\
\
\
,
-
,
.',
\
\
1
j
t
. I /
.j ",/
--.-"".,..
f-.----I
i
/
I
;(j
:0
;C
> L
- ...
~~
z:=:
~~
i
,
/
./
1"'-"--'
i
"
..~.....
-.........
.
".
"\
I
!
r--__'.---J
i
I
!
l__...._.\
"
..'.....
......--.
".
c::.
"'\
> .
j
I .
,
,
/
(/J
(')
.
lf
...
....
'0
0
:;
;II.
~ I Q
01
IN
I r.
aD
I :;,
UI
I 0
:r
~
~
........
PO.
~
~
,-~.
j
/
,
./
,
,
\\~
.',
............-- --.....
.....
c',.
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty f
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB,ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX'(612) 474-0128. www.state,netlshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
Mayor and City Council
James Hurm, City Administrator
JA'fr
.
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
DATE:
March 10, 1997
RE:
Authorization to Enter into an Agreement for Professional Engineering Services
by McCombs Frank: Roos Associates, Inc.
At the last City Council meeting, Staff was directed to prepare an agreement for preparation of
survey and stormwater management tasks by McCombs Frank: Roos Associates, Inc. for the Ron
Johnson property.
.
The intent is to utilize McCombs Frank: Roos Associates, Inc. and myself to survey the Johnson
property and determine how the property is currently being impacted by the existing ,storm sewer
system which serves the Waterford Development. McCombs Frank: Roos Associates Inc. has been
selected because of their past experience and familiarity with the Johnson property.
The formal agreement is yet to be finalized and reviewed by the City Attorney. In the interest of
time, staff is requesting authorization for the Mayor and City Administrator to enter into an
agreement for professional services to obtain and prepare data for the following items:
· Prepare a topographic survey for the Ron Johnson property
. Prepare backwater calculations to determine the elevation of the water on the Johnson Property
from the Waterford storm sewer system.
This agreement is not to exceed $3,500 and would be executed once the formal agreement has been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, and an executed agreement has been received from the
Johnson's granting right of entry onto the property for said purposes, and that the information can
not be used as evidence in a court of law.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council approve a motion authorizing the Mayor and City
Administrator to enter into an agreement for professional engineering services with McCombs Frank:
Roos Associates, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $3,500.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
#3D,
.
.
,
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
Professional Lake Weed Control
"Since 1977"
April 3, 1997
City Of Shorewood
Al Rolek or Jim Hurm
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood MN 55331
RE: Cust. # 2073
Dear Mr. Rolek or Mr. Hurm:
/9\9 7
I
I
I~
I~ APR
/.BY
4 1997
~f.!
'1
!
I
Thank you for letting us serve you last summer. Again this
summer, we look forward to enhancing your swimming, fishing,
and boating by controlling those unsightly weeds.
Because there is eurasian watermilfoil in your lake, we will
coordinate our treatments with the lake association's eurasian
watermilfoil plan. This may delay your first treatment slightly.
Please take a minute to review the enclosed sign-up form. If
you have any special concerns, please note them in the space
provided.
Thank you,
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
P.S. Please return the enclosed sign-up form by April 18th to
be included in the DNR permit.
620 Hamel Road
Hamel, Minnesota 55340
.' ~
(612) 478 *3 P \
.CUST#: 2073
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
t 610 HAkE~ ~OAD
HAlYIEL lvIN. 55340
612-478-9421
1997 SIGN-UP FORM FOR THE TREATMENT OF LAKE WEEDS
LAKE: Christmas COUNTY: Hennepin
"
City Of Shorewood
Al Rolek or Jim Hurm
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood MN 55331
Treatment Address (if different than
mailing address)
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
1. TREATMENTS WILL BE MADE FOR THE CONTROL OF: Eurasion watermilfoil.
2. THE INSPECTION AREA INCLUDES: Christmas 'Lake.
3. INSPECTIONS PROGRAM: Lake Restoration, Inc. trained and licensed
personnel will conduct inspections consisting of a minimum of ten
grapple samples per acre with a more concentrated effort in public
areas. Weed samples are documented and if eurasian watermilfciil is ..
found the shore area is marked & the location mapped. A report with
the findings will be issued upon completion of the program.
4. SPECIAL CONCERNS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
PRICING & TERMS: Net 30
1. Inspection of the entire littoral zone (area less than 15 feet deep)
Cost $797.68 PER INSPECTION.
V 1 in SPRING
Please check desired inspections.
(BOTH are recommended)
J 1 in FALL
.
2. Inspection to be done:
What stands out on your property that makes it easy to locate from the lake:
TOTAL SHORELINE FOOTAGE:
o
AMOUNT TO BE TREATED:
o
HOME PHONE:
WORK PHONE:
(612) 474-3236
SIGNATURE: DATE:
**please return original copy - Keep carbon copy for your records**
""'1:
h:.. ~: ' 1-
-.
,/
....--.., .",,-. ~
':i '1' ".'. ,; ,,!-.~\ LAKE 6~~S 9~~t I R~AD-lNC . ~'. ;.::~~... ..>;~'"
HAMEL MN 55340 t
,. 612-478-9421 ,:: .. 'j
1996 SIGN-UP FORM FOR THE TREATMENT O~ ~AKE WE)
LAKE: Christmas COUNTY: Hennel
199ft;
6fty Of Shorewood.. Treatment Address
AL~Rolek .0r:~'Jim':'Hurm'.":,; ~._~~<t.~:~":_":!;";<o;,;"",',,,,;,, ,_' .:....;.."'~mail..ing. address)'
5 7 5 5 Count r'y'''''' c-ru.1:i; :Ref' .~', ':'< ",;~:,:;;-~,;;;,,::..,~, ",.":',": '. -:; . ':. .~,.,;:- '_:::. ~'-", " ' ~- - "-':.,,
.. . -~.__ '. - ~f..,.,,' ".~ :"~"5;"~"'''''-' ~....:::,.. '..~ ~_t7 ...."'€: ~.~r..:~~"'~~;::,~":~'.;Jo :~ ~l: .... .~~ .....-. :.. ~_" .-~
Shorewood:' .~/t",..::: ..':' ,;'.f.4_-o."MN -:5533'1'~;,(;,J,.i:.,":"~..",-,,, ~ :::..., ','-, - ....' .".. .' '....'.~".. ..' ;~,~,' ,:
..~;~;~,.,;::~{~.. :..~:..,; .~:~f~~~~::~i~~;~it\~~;f;~~{~7~":~~j;:~.: ;"'-~-<-, ;:.~~. .~~.~- '~, '.', '~:-- ,:~~":": ......,=,. .
"_ ....,.._~.;.i::~.:t.~.:: ~:'_. -
;.
'.
~.,;
,..c~. ....,'L-;..
'"
,- -::l
1
~
;,
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
1. INSPECTIONS WILL BE MADE FOR THE CONTROL OF.: Eurasian Watermilfoil.
2. THE INSPECTION AREA INCLUDES: Christmas Lake.
-. I~:P:CTI~:S~::o~=-':::e~:~ :or::o~~ cI:c~ t r~;ned-:d'-~;~:n:~:- - ---. c-._
personnel will conduct inspections consisting of a minimum of ten
grapple samples per acre with a more concentreated effort in public
'areas. Weed samples are documented and if eurasian watermilfoil is
found the shore area is marked and the location mapped. A report with
the findings will be issn~d upon completion of the program.
~ ,~.'.?'
.,;
....._'....,.:
.1
:,
4
"',:4 ,'~':'SPECIAL 'CONCERNS~;'OR PROB~, AR~AS.:} _ .
,,'-"~.,;:" --.-"' ... ~-:.:" -. .. .:;....~~. ..~~.. . ..... ..'" ~..f~ ".--.-;:.. _.~. -. . - ,.,' ;.~ -' ""'~:~'.:'.-:,";' ,.;. ;;.. '. -, '.,'",. . :'_,'
..-.......~ -- ~._....... _.~.. "-".."..-
'l:
.4:
':~' ,.,. ':_' c.' C'; ~::,:tt,:~'~gf~;:;:;g,~,'~'''';;~f.:&2;~7q;;t:> ;~. 7:; \k:::~...:..~ ,_.',~._
'-"'. ;~..
.&.. '-
q
?RICING'& TERMS: NET 30.
zone (areal~ss: than.. ~5 feet deep).
.;.-:'~:'.;':' ," ~~
J .';' .., ~ '.,
......' ..., '. . .. . '....
2. Inspection to be done: Please check desired ill~pectioijs...c.
.. . '_,_, .;.".. ....~. ._,-..'.+N............. ,(BQTH.ARE,.RE~OMMJniDEnl~~..- ""';'''~'''''l'':'':''':'-::''~L'''_-
. ~.- "', ; ".r. -~'- ~1_"... -r '.J' ~_ l"1~"~" ~,...,.....fl,.'T.~...I:- _ -; ...~!''''..j ).,-:.:~--:.- '~t .....;._..- ._:.,.......,.~~~ "',~-"'f~~ "-'~_"'~.::~~ 1 ';~-.~-"~,~~"
..~.f~:;..;..."'-.; : ---~'-.--'
.,~
. ":.i..;.~,>.J-"
. . t,.
. Inspection of the entire littoral
Cost ~$r6J~90PER INSPECTION.
,,~,'~~"-"-'.'^"'--':'-'"'~~'~':".' -"".-, ':"
.
.1
--1L 1
in SPRING
\~ -:x....
1 in FALL
"
.i :;~,.
'I
I
,,'"
?LEASE SIGN AND RETURN ORIGINAL COpy TO LAKE RESTORATION AS SOO,N AS POSSIBLE
?OR PROCESSING AND SCHEDULING:
-.'
- .~ ,
~":} , .,.~..,.
.'1'; . .... '. ...
-~""~"l:..t _.~~.;.,' .....-> '~..,.... ...,
~ l'.~ .
~.,.',.r~ t'''.:; . _'" ...:;.;,.A....__. ~'._:;
.:". ~ i ..~,
.' '_,,'~_'. .~* 1.., _.,"~__,.....~,....~_._.:-.;,..~..~""'=.-1.... .'
. . ~ ! .~, _ l-::' ;:..~'- .~:
in
.. I.
!j l
P" ,
."cl
..
.' ..:_~~... ..:....:. -. ..... ~':',;"-"~""_""-~":"'..., .". ._.:;. ......,;,.;: ""'+:::-:'.~~.' ~..-;;.--.-: .', ~~,. 'd.!"..';" ....--'~I;._
31LLING ADDRESS"{ f(;,di fferenf: than, above aibove'''a'ddress}:
:.~"'''- .: '~:~-",. . ~..-..:. . ".:,:..:: ..-- _, : :...'.. _. " -;.... . ~~;_ : ,.i'; 40. .... . ' .
. ;A.".....;
."#-/.._",,,,,, .
. -..... '-""';-':." ~.
~.~ -.
::,' -:1
. ':,-.'.- ._-
?HONE# :
;IGNATURE:2~
PHONE# :' (612) 474- 3 236
DATE:
.'t If! ''!':
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
o RAfl
Chair Colopoulos called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Colopoulos; Commissioners Wilson, Dallman, and Arnst; Council
Liaison McCarty; Administrator Hurm; City Engineer Larry Brown; and
Commissioner Puzak arrived at 8:50 p.m.
Absent:
Commissioner Bensman.
3. REVIEW AGENDA
There were no changes to the agenda.
4 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of Februmy 25. 1997: Commissioner Arnst had several changes: Page 1,
item #5, third sentence, add "in the state" after the word "accidents"; Page 2, item #5, third
paragraph, change the fifth sentence beginning with "Ms. Schaff..." to reflect her police vs,
pedestrian safety concern; page 3, item #7, third paragraph, first sentence, change "decide" to
"discuss"; page 3, item 7, fifth paragraph, change "report" to "memo from Mike Hammer";
Commissioner Wilson requested a change on page 3, item 7, ninth paragraph, reword to reflect
the detailed conversation between Mr. Harrison and Commissioner Wilson; Commissioner
Arnst requested a deletion of paragraph 5 on page 4 beginning with "Hurm questioned...";
page 5, item #10, second paragraph, to include Mr. Reutiman's first name "Bob"; and page 5,
item #12, to include the reason for Little League's delay in payment for park services.
Commissioner Arnst moved, Dallman seconded, to approve the minutes of
February 25, 1997 as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
Work Session of March 11. 1997: Commissioner Arnst had several changes: Page 3, item #4,
second paragraph, change second sentence to "Planner Nielsen said that at an 'open house
meeting', look..."; same paragraph, fifth sentence to delete "focus group" because this is a
different kind of group; page 3, item #4, fourth paragraph, to clarify ..."LRT in the summer of
1995."; page 4, first paragraph, to include information about wood chips for a trail surface;
page 4, second paragraph, second sentence to read ''The City has to provide..."; page 4, fourth
paragraph, second sentence, change "construct" to "examine"; and page 4, sixth paragraph, to
read "...signage specifications of allowed uses...".
Commissioner Dallman moved, Wilson seconded, to approve the minutes of
March 11, 1997 as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MARCH 25,1997
page 2
..
5 . MA TTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no matters from the floor.
6. MANOR PARK LIGHT
A memo dated 3/17/97 from Commissioner Bensman was reviewed. It highlighted comments
(via phone contact) from neighbors adjacent to the Manor Park proposed light location. The
comments were in support of the new light.
City Engineer Larry Brown handed out a diagram of the pond at Manor Park and had placed an
influence graph for the lights on the diagram. The light w.as placed approximately 8-10 feet off
the water surface on the graph. Different contour levels or light levels were evident on the
water. Shorewood ordinances reference light level maximums, and the proposed light is well
within those tolerances. Brown recommended a wooden pole to support the light. A picture of
the proposed floodlight refers to a shoebox fixture in which you do not see the light source
from the side.
.
There is an existing light by the corner of the warming house. During the 1996-97 skating
season, rink attendants had noted difficulties seeing skaters at the other end of the rink due to
poor lighting conditions. Brown requested the Park Commission consider removing the
existing light and provide two new fixtures in order to be consistent between the two lights.
There are some floodlight adjustments available; for example, raising a bracket 1-2 degrees
(where you still don't see the light source) has a dramatic effect on throwing the light fOrward.
Brown also indicated that this is a 400 watt light which is less than what's out there now.
Commissioner Dallman moved, Trettel seconded, to recommend to City
Council to add the new light and replace the old one with an identical light as
proposed by City Engineer Brown. Motion carried unanimously.
7 . FREEMAN PARK CONCESSION TRAILER - RFP's
One business proposal for the Freeman Park Concession Trailer was received from .
Minnetonka Community Education Services (MCES): Todd Strot, Program Coordinator. Todd ·
Strot was not able to attend this meeting.
MCES noted the contract dates for the trailer will be May 4, 1997 through July 19, 1997.
Colopoulos was concerned that softball and soccer events may extend beyond the middle of
July. Colopoulos stated that Strot will need to respond to this concern.
Commissioner Dallman asked if Strot could be supported by the City instead of Community
Services in order to channel all of the profits toward a permanent concession building (instead
of the proposed 50/50 split of net profits between MCES and the City of Shorewood).
Commissioner Dallman requested City staff to research insurance concerns for Strot and the
concession trailer if supported through the City or the Park Foundation. Administrator Hurm
noted that the City is not in the concession business. He said that after speaking with Dan
Kuzlik (MCES Director) and Todd Strot, they may be persuaded to "seed" the funding of the
permanent concession building. Involvement by MCES, the City of Shorewood, or the Park
Foundation may induce cooperative efforts between the soccer and softball organizations to
eventually sponsor this concession service.
Commissioner Arnst inquired about the fmancial reporting technique. This will need to be
addressed by Strot prior to approval of this business proposal. She noted that MCES will
assume all product liability and all insurance will be maintained under MCES' umbrella policy.
.
.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997
page 3
Commissioner Wilson moved, Dallman seconded, to recommend to City
Council to approve the business proposal from MCES to provide a concession
trailer provided that they supply satisfactory answers to concerns such as:
. Will MCES pay wages for concession workers?
. Financial reports will be submitted in what kind of format?
. List of products to be sold
. What specifically is covered under the insurance policy and what are
the liability limits?
Discussion followed with Commissioner Dallman noting that clarifIcation was needed if
MCES, the City, or the Park Foundation would be the sponsor for Strot's proposal of the
Pepsi concession trailer.
Commissioner Wilson withdrew his motion. Commissioner Dallman withdrew his second to
the motion. .
Commissioner Dallman moved, Wilson seconded, that MCES clarify the
following issues and respond in writing:
. Will MCES pay wages for concession workers?
. Who will be sponsoring the trailer (MCES, City of Shore wood, or
. Park Foundation)?
. What specifically is covered under the insurance policy and what are
the liability limits?
. Financial reports submitted in what type of format?
. Provide a list of products to be sold
Following receipt of the responses to these concerns, the Park Commission will be able to
determine whether or not we should accept this proposal.
Commissioner Dallman stated that if we assume MCES will cover all the costs for running the
concession trailer (including the required insurance coverage), and after all expenses are paid,
they are going to present the City with 50% of the net profIts, then the City ought to consider
hiring Strot directly in order to retain 100% of the profIts. Costs should be the same for MCES
as they would be for the City.
Administrator Hurm illustrated two scenarios in which a hypothetical $15,000 net profit was
realized. One scenario illustrated MCES supporting Strot; whereby $7,500 profIt goes to
MCES and $7,500 profIt goes to the City of Shorewood. The other scenario illustrated the
City supporting Strot; whereby the City received $15,000 profIt to go toward a new concession
building.
Commissioner Arnst questioned the City's loyalties to MCES. Chair Colopoulos stated that if
MCES were to take over complete responsibility of the labor issue: finding people to man the
concession stand; making sure that if someone doesn't show up that they fInd a replacement;
opening and closing; payroll, etc. - that's worth something to us as a service. Chair
Colopoulos was not sure that it is worth 50% of the profIts, but it's worth something. . If this is
what MCES is offering, we need to consider the the fair market value of this. Administrator
Hurm assumed that Strot would perform the same service for MCES as he would for the City.
He suggested that the Park Commission pursue both options for review.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MARCH 25,1997
page 4
Administrator Hurm clarified that MCES became involved because Strot works through MCES
in his function as Director of the Adult Softball Association. MCES also has some experience
with concessions.
Chair Colopoulos noted that this is a business experiment in that someone needs to share the
risk portion of the equation of profits or losses.
Administrator Hurm will talk to Strot regarding who he can/will work for: MCES or the City or
if the Park Foundation would like to oversee this concession trailer? He will set up a meeting
with Strot, Kuzlik, and Commissioner Dallman. Commissioner Dallman suggested these
concerns be addressed prior to the next Park Commission meeting on April 8, 1997, and a
recommendation be made at that time. This time frame will allow a recommendation for the
City Council's consideration at the April 13, 1997 meeting. .
All voted aye for the motion at hand. Motion carried unanimously.
8.
TRAIL PLAN REVIEW
.
Administrator Hurm presented a Trail Plan Review: Initial Packet. This packet highlighted
some dynamics of citizen participation. He asked the Commission to review the memorandum
regarding "Citizen Participation - Recent Literature Research." Following a discussion, he
stated that the citizen participation process attempts to include as many people as possible who
may be affected by a project, and recommendations should be made to allow as many "win-
win" situations as possible. A project objective would be to get as many "consent" opinions
as possible because those affected with a proposed project would have helped design the
solution(s).
Chair Colopoulos and Commissioner Dallman noted that the Trail Plan was designed in 1992.
Commissioner Dallman questioned what hampered its implementation at that time and whether
the Park Commission needs to start over. Administrator Hurm replied that a Trail Fund did not
exist in 1992, and the Trail Plan notes that trail construction was to be completed simult-
aneously with road reconstruction. Major roadways which have proposed adjacent trails have
not been reconstructed since 1992. Some proposed street projects are also tied to State Aid
funding. .
Commissioner Wilson inquired about the origination of a trail plan. Administrator Hurm stated
that the trail plan arose from the Comprehensive Plan; Transportation section. This section
recommends that the safe movement of bicyclists and pedestrians be considered when planning
for streets (page TR-6). .
Commissioner Arnst stated that while the citizen involvement materials were valuable, one
important question had not been addressed, that being the right-of-way problems on
Smithtown Road. She questioned whether the Park Commission would move forward with
any more planning until the properties have been identified. Chair Colopoulos said it could
present a "brick wall". Commissioner Arnst agreed, saying that if the properties were
numerous, the cost of condemnation might make building the trail impractical.
Administrator Hurm explained that in a worst case scenario, the time frame is okay. He said
the City's position at this point is there aren't right-of-way problems. Putting the matter in
perspective, only one-half of the right-of-way would be necessary for the trail. There are no
right-of-way questions on half or two-thirds of that. there are some properties where there
may be challenges that may have to be worked out. Hurm said from a legal perspective, there
are different interpretations.
.
.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997
page 5
Commissioner Arnst asked how many pieces of property had potential problems.
Administrator Hurm said he did not know. He would have to count them. He also indicated
that he has asked the City Attorney for a legal opinion on the properties.
Commissioner Puzak said that the right-of-way question needs to be answered. He said there
were two important pieces of information: (1) we are thinking about a trail, do we have the
ability to do it; and (2) the motivation to build the trail. he referred to a survey done by the City
where a preponderance of the community said they wanted a trail.
Commissioner Arnst asked if there was a list of properties that could be available to the Park
Commission. Hurm said that could be provided. Commissioner Puzak said that we need to
identify and answer the fundamental questions before we spe~d more time looking at building a
trail. He said there were always ways to solve the problem if you know what the issues are.
Chair Colopoulos and Commissioner Arnst agreed that the Park Commission needs to know
before going into the project, what the problems will be.
Administrator Hurm recommended a subcommittee to work with him to revise the steps on the
trail plan, submit a time line, review what has been done and the data to develop the step
process. The subcommittee will consist of Administrator Hurm, and Commissioners Puzak
and Arnst.
Steps in Trail Plan Review (page 8 of the Trail Plan Review packet) was discussed. Commis-
sioner Puzak noted several other concerns:
. Ability to build (right-of-way)
. Do we want the trail?
. Accuracy of 1992 data compared to 1997 opinions
. Costs politically, financially, and legally
. Awareness of the "Not In My Back Yard" syndrome
. Identification of the size and location of a trail (on-street yellow stripe, sidewalk,
off-street)
Commissioner Trettel wants to involve computerized drawings of proposed trails. A cost
estimate of this technique was requested.
Administrator Hurm will work with Commissioners Puzak and Arnst to develop information
on what has already been done and to develop the steps to go forward.
Commissioner Dallman moved, Arnst seconded, that Administrator Hurm work
with Commissioners puzak and Arnst to gather information and to get a time
frame for trail planning to be distributed at the May 13, 1997 meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
9 . REPORT ON PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION ON
SNOWMOBILE LAKE ACCESS
Copies of minutes from Planning Commission meetings held on February 18, 1997 and March
4, 1997 were available for informational purposes.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997
page 6
10. CITY COMMUNICATIONS PLAN
A copy of the adopted Communications Plan was included in the Commission packet for
informational purposes.
11. FOOTBALL FIELD SOD STRATEGY
Administrator Hurm reported on his conversation with Jim Wilson representing the Tonka
Football Association, regarding the $5,200-$6,000 expense to sod the football field. It was
suggested that the Football Association, the TonkaMen's Club, the American Legion, and the
City of Shorewood be approached for donations to fund this project. The Football Association
has committed at least $1,000 toward the sod project. Administrator Hurm suggested that
these requests (for $2,000) be made in writing as soon as possible.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Commissioner Trettel had a request from Vine Ridge Road neighbors to put a backstop on a
portion of the tennis court wall to be used for rollerblade hockey games. . Children would be
using tennis balls as hockey pucks, and rollerblading on the asphalt. This request will be
forwarded to the Public Works Department.
Administrator Hurm had received a request from a resident willing to partially fund the cost of
a basketball hoop at Manor Park. The comment was also made to Commissioner Bensman
during her telephone survey. During the park tour in May 1997, Commissioners are requested
to review this possibility. Concerns of vandalism were discussed.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Commissioner Dallman moved, Arnst seconded, to
adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:50
P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Wendy Anderson, Parks Secretary
.
'"
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
DRAfT
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Colopoulos called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Colopoulos; Commissioners Wilson, Dallman, Puzak, Bensman, and
Arnst; Council Liaison McCarty; and Administrator Hurm.
.
Absent:
Commissioner Trettel.
3. REVIEW AGENDA
There were no chang s to the agenda.
4.
Commissioner Arnst ad several changes: Page 5, Item #11, to delete the City of Shorewood from list
of organizations to b approached for donations; Page 5, Item 12, change "Vine Ridge Road" to
"Silverwood"; and P ge 4, Item #8, to add conversation regarding right-of-way concerns.
Commissioner Arnst ave Chair Colopoulos a copy of her requested revisions (see attached Exhibit).
Commissioner Ams moved, Dallman seconded, to table approval of the minutes of March 25,
1997 until the next r gular meeting, and to include the recommended revisions. Colopoulos,
Arnst, Puzak, Dallm n, and Wilson voted Aye. Bensman abstained. Motion carried.
.
5.
from the floor.
6. FREEMAN ARK CONCESSION TRAILER FOR 1997
Commissioner Dall reported that Todd Strot,. Dan Kuzlik (Director of Minnetonka Community
Services or MCES), dministrator Hurm, and himself met that afternoon for clarification of some
issues regarding the oncession trailer proposal. From the gross sales, costs to be extracted include
labor, cost of the trai er, and cost of the food product. Profits would be split 50/50 between MCES
and the City of Sho wood. Administrative and bookkeeping services will be provided by MCES, at
no charge. Benefits f the concession trailer management by MCES include their access to staff,
contractor vendor se ices, food product buying capability (they buy products for the school district)
and probably better rices. If the City ran it, we would not have those luxuries, and probably run into
higher costs. Admin strator Hurm and Commissioner Dallman agreed that for the first year we would
benefit by having M ES manage the concession trailer.
Administrator Hurm oted that MCES said they would be the fiscal agent, they would take care of the
administration and t e bookkeeping, the insurance would be covered under the school's insurance
(which would be to he City's standards), and it would be considered a "turn-key" operation.
Administrative costs ill not be charged to the program.
#sR
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y, APRIL 8, 1997
page 2
Chair Colopoulos inquired about the funding, in that it sounded like MCES would be fronting the
entire cost of the trailer, so MCES is taking 100% of the risk. Administrator Hurm noted that MCES
would evaluate this program at an early date and if it is going "down the tubes" (for example, in
three weeks), MCES would pull the concession trailer. If that scenario happened, there would be no
cost for the City.
Commissioner Dallman added that MCES would provide the City with copies of invoices for
products, and report to the City three times (basically once a month). Todd Strot stated that the
trailer is reserved through July 25, 1997. The last soccer game is scheduled for July 19, 1997, and
Strot extended the trailer through the following week to allow for rain games.
Commissioner Dallman noted that the question of the collection of sales tax remains to be answered
by MCES and/or the City.
Administrator Hurm said that profit is defined as total revenues minus total expenses. There are no
overhead costs (such as administrative costs). Commissioner Dallman asked if arrangements had
been made with a neighbor for parking the trailer during off-hours. Administrator Hurm reported
that Gordon Lindstrom had spoken with Mr. Wagner, and he had indicated that he'd be happy to .
allow us to park the concession trailer on his property. However, Mr. Wagner later called Mr.
Lindstrom stating that he would not be able to provide a space for the trailer due to liability reasons.
The City and MCES will pursue this issue.
Commissioner Puzak made a suggestion that either MCES or the City could offer the insurance
coverage to Mr. Wagner. He also asked if the City was situated to make an easy transition from the
concession trailer management from MCES to the Park Foundation. Administrator Hurm noted that
Dan Kuzlik's intention is for the Park Foundation to take over this operation within one to two years.
This will be an agenda item for the Park Foundation at their April 17, 1997 meeting.
Commissioner Dallman moved, Bensman seconded, to recommend to Council to enter into a
contract with M CES to run the concession trailer this year per the Business Plan submitted March
19, 1997. All voted aye. Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Puzak questioned if the City had to enter into a "contract", or could the trailer just
be delivered and managed by MCES. Commissioner Dallman stated that a contract is good for
MCES as well as for the City.
7.
PLANNING FOR PARK TOURS
.
Administrator Hurm stated that park tours are planned to be conducted during the two May meetings.
The tours will begin at 6:00 P.M. followed by the regular Park Commission meetings at 8:00 P.M.
Councilmember McCarty stated that these tours were for inspection purposes.
Cathcart, Freeman and Crescent Beach will be on the schedule for the first meeting (Tuesday, May
13) and Manor, Silverwood and Badger for the second meeting (Wednesday, May 28).
8. UPDATE ON PARK CIP
Administrator Hurm reported that the Park Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been revised
because a few projects were left over from previous years and he wanted to reflect them on the
current CIP. There is an additional $7,000 budgeted for sod at Badger field ($6,000 for football
field, and $1,000 for seeding or sodding the rest of the area). Park Funding Sources note that $3,500
may come from donations.
Chair Colopoulos asked about Cathcart parking lot and ballfield completion. Administrator Hurm
reported that these will be completed in the next few weeks.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y, APRIL 8, 1997
page 3
Commissioner Wilson questioned the cost of the light at Manor Park. Administrator Hurm said this
cost includes two light fixtures, a pole, trenching and wiring. He said competitive quotes will be
received.
Commissioner Wilson moved, Bensman seconded, to recommend to Council to accept the updates
to the 1997 Park CIP Budget. All voted aye. Motion carried unanimously.
9. REPORT ON BADGER SOD STRATEGY
Chair Colopoulos stated that the sod strategy is to solicit contributions from the Tonka Men's Club,
Football Association, and the American Legion. Letters requesting donations were mailed April 3,
1997. Chair Colopoulos requested a report on donations at the next Commission meeting.
Councilmember McCarty reported that City Engineer Brown commented at the last Council meeting
that sod is machine cut and laid in 6' rolls. The City may not have to request volunteers to lay the
sod on the Badger football field. Commissioner Puzak asked what the City needs to do to prepare. the
field for the new sod. Administrator Hurm said that the City is responsible through the construction
project to make sure erosion does not occur.
.
Commissioner Wilson questioned where funds may be forthcoming if contributions were less than
expected to pay for the sod. Administrator Hurm said that the City may match funds donated by the
Football Association. The Commission and Council will have to determine if additional Park funds
are justified.
10. ARBOR DAY REMINDER
Arbor Day will be observed on Saturday, April 26, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. at Freeman Park. Mr. Bob
Reutiman will donate two maple trees which will be planted at that time. Chair Colopoulos,
Commissioners Wilson, Bensman, and Puzak will be in attendance. The City Council will be
encouraged to attend. Pictures will be taken for the local newspapers.
11. CITY FESTIVAL PLANNING
.
Chair Colopoulos stated that the Park Commission has been specifically requested to fmd a way to
have a City Festival. The first step is to fmd a volunteer to chair a committee organized to plan this
festival.
Councilmember McCarty suggested a brainstorming session with other members of the community.
Commissioner Bensman strongly suggested finding someone with a great deal of enthusiasm and
leadership skills to chair this festival planning activity. Chair Colopoulos 'said that we could try to
solicit through the newsletter and through other means to organize a citizen's action committee to
organize and run this festival. This would accomplish two things: it will involve the citizenry with the
festival organization; and it will test the waters of just how badly this town wants a festival and whether
there is a demand for it.
Commissioner Bensman reported that two years ago, the objective of a festival was to allow the
citizens to experience the parks. Councilmember McCarty stated that this will be more of a
"community spirit" sort of activity. This does not have to be located in a park. It could be at the
Country Club, the Senior Community Center, or somewhere else to draw the community together.
She also suggested calling the Sun Sailor newspaper to write an article requesting citizen involvement.
Administrator Hurm reported that in two of the last newsletters the City invited citizens with an
interest in helping to plan a City festival to contact City Hall. To date, no responses have been
received.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y, APRIL 8, 1997
page 4
Commissioner Wilson noted the activities organized by the City of Chanhassen, stating that they
solicit donations from local businesses and City staff plans and runs about five activities throughout
the year with great success. These activities have grown in popularity over the years. Commissioner
Bensman commented that the planner(s) has to have an incredible amount of enthusiasm to run an
activity of this magnitude, and to handle the incredible amount of work involved. She also reiterated
that the organizational skills, leadership skills, and available time to work on this project are essential
to the success of a City activity.
Commissioner Bensman suggested starting out with a single event (i.e. lOK run, or fishing event) and
add to the event next year. It may be too overwhelming to plan activities for an entire day.
Councilmember McCarty said that the first City Festival would probably be scheduled for 1998.
Ideas for a single community event included: a park campout; a rock band, high school band or
bluegrass concert; ice cream social; bicycle ride; trail walk or run; and lOK run on LRT or Smithtown
Road.
Chair Colopoulos suggested involving the seniors with the planning/organizational process.
Commissioner Puzak inquired about the different activities associated with the Shorewood area and/or
its residents. He noted that many residents were known for their hybrid flower gardens. Gordon
Lindstrom (in the audience) suggested contacting local historians for suggestions. He also suggested
an antique boat festival, sailboats or yachting. Other themes for a City festival suggested by
Commissioner Puzak included: the large variety of birds in our area; fireworks; official "Ice-Out"
Day celebration; apple orchards (used to be here); Shakespeare; haunted forest @ Freeman Park;
Halloween party/treasure hunt at a park; or hot-air balloon launching from Freeman Park.
Chair Colopoulos said that the next step would be for City Council to invite citizen involvement in a
City-sponsored event. Commissioner Bensman felt that Mayor Dahlberg should appoint someone to
run this event - someone who will be actively and visibly involved in management of this festival.
Administrator Hurm suggested inviting local historians to the next work session for additional ideas.
Commissioner Puzak moved, Dallman seconded, to suggest to the Council that all
Councilmembers, Park Commissioners, Planning Commissioners, and interested citizens and/or
groups schedule a meeting to brainstorm ideas for a City Festival. All voted aye. Motion carried
unanimously.
12. RESCHEDULE MAY 27,1997 MEETING
Administrator Hurm reported that Memorial Day is Monday, May 26, 1997. The regularly
scheduled City Council meeting will be moved to Tuesday, May 27, 1997. The regularly scheduled
Park Commission meeting will need to be moved to Wednesday, May 28, 1997. It was the consensus
of the Commission to do so.
13. NEW BUSINESS
Chan.e;e of Meetin.e; Dates: Administrator Hurm requested a change in the next work session meeting
date - from Tuesday, April 22, 1997 to Tuesday, April 29, 1997. Information gathering and
compiling of snowmobile data will be completed the week of April 21, 1997. These reports will be
delivered to Commissioners in time for discussion and evaluation on April 29, 1997. It was. the
consensus of the Commission to do so.
Request for Clarification: Chair Colopoulos requested specific instruction from the City Council
regarding the Park Commission's responsibilities for snowmobile enforcement evaluation and/or
recommendations.
.
.
.
.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y, APRIL 8, 1997
page 5
Beautification of Freeman Park Entrance: Commissioner Arnst requested a flower garden be placed
at the entrance to Freeman Park. She questioned whether the Men's Garden Club may want to be
involved. Commissioner Wilson noted that the Men's Garden Club is very busy and cannot take on
more projects. Chair Colopoulos suggested a combination of shrubbery and flowers at the Freeman
Park entrance.
Commissioner Puzak noted that the City should have a liaison between the Senior Community Center
and the City. Commissioner Arnst suggested a flower garden near the Senior Community
CenterlBadger Park also.
Administrator Hurm suggested that the first meeting of the Council, Commissioners, and citizens be
held at the Senior Community Center.
Transit Service Improvements: Administrator Hurm reported that the Metropolitan Council met with
the City Council regarding transit service and the expenditure of tax dollars. They are working with
Senior Community Services to provide a program that will go to Ridgedale every two hours, and Dial-
A-Ride services will also be available. A place will need to be found to store the two senior buses.
14.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Puzak moved, Arnst seconded, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried
unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:20 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Wendy Anderson
Parks Secretary
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT FOR CONCESSION SERVICES IN FREEMAN PARK
WHEREAS, the Shorewood Park Commission has completed a request for proposal
process for concession services in the north parking lot of Freeman Park; and
WHEREAS, one proposal for concession operations was received; and
WHEREAS, that proposal, submitted by Minnetonka Community Education Services
(MCES), Todd Strot, Program Coordinator, has been duly reviewed by the Park Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Park Commission at its April 8, 1997 meeting recommended that the
City Council enter into an agreement with MCES to run the concession trailer for the 1997 sports
season per the business plan submitted March 19, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood City Council that the
business proposal for concession operations at Freeman Park submitted by MCES, Todd Strot,
Program Coordinator, is hereby accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator is authorized to prepare an
appropriate agreement for service and the Mayor and City Administrator are authorized to execute
said agreement.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
this 14th day of April, 1997.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
58
TO: City of Shorewood
FROM: MCES, Todd Strot Program Coordinator
BUSINESS PROPOSAL
~~cc~~\W~~:
ml. MAR'191997 ~I
By I
FOR CONCESSION OPERATION AT
FREEMAN PARK
(March 19, 1997)
.
.
Proposed concession trailer will operate in north section of Freeman Park where
adult softball and youth soccer activities are held. The concession trailer that will be used
is a rental unit from Pepsi Co. (See photos enclosed). The trailer size is approximately
l5'L x TW.
DATES: Hours of operation will be May 4, 1997 - July 19, 1997. Hours will be 5:30
p.m. to close of activities Monday - Friday. Additional dates and hours can be added if
activities warrant, i.e. makeup games, tournaments, etc.
.
MENU ITEMS WILL CONSIST OF: Pepsi Co. products - variety of snack size chips,
individually wrapped snacks, assorted and wrapped candies, hot dogs and brats, polish
sausage and fresh popcorn.
Because this is a new program with no prior information to base a market study, Pepsi
Co. has provided us with verbal info that 75% of people attending an outdoor event will
purchase products from a concession area, i.e. at least 300 people attend Freeman Park at
a given week day - 75% of 300 = 225 people. Assuming 225 people spend $1.00 at the
concession area per night x 5 nights x 11 weeks the estimated gross sales would be
$12,375.00 less trailer rent of $2,981.00 = $9,394.00 NET SALES.
.
At the close of soccer and softball sessions, MCES will agree to share all sales data with
City of Shorewood. After all expenses have been paid, MCES will split 50/50 Net profits
with city.
MCES will assume all product liability. All insurance will be maintained under MCES'
umbrella policy.
Todd Strot, as tournament director for organizing softball tournaments in Excelsior and
Shorewood has many years of experience. These tournaments were for the purpose of
fund raising. His duties included concession operations, ex-food ordering/purchase, food
preparation, oversee work crew, pricing products, and maintaining account receivables
and payables.
The above proposal is contingent on the approval of licensing by Hennepin County
Health Dept.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A
PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1997
WHEREAS, the Shorewood Park Commission has reviewed and approved the attached
five year Park Project and Park Funding Source Summary; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is still in the process of reviewing in detail the five year
Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, this revised park project schedule includes projects that had been scheduled
in previous years with funds set aside.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood City Council that the
Park Project Schedule listed for 1997 is hereby adopted as the 1997 Park Capital Budget.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD
this 14th day of April, 1997.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
~5(!.,
PARKS
Park Project Schedule:
The Park Capital Improvement Plan (PCIP) for 1997-2001 is shown on the following page. The PCIP
lists projects planned for each year. Budget numbers are adjusted with an inflation factor and should be
considered the budget for the entire project including "soft costs" such as planning, engineering, project
management, etc.
.. . "., '."., ..., /;.'PARK,RROJECTSeHEDULE ',< .......'. ,;; ".,.
'.
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
BADGER:
Horseshoe Pit, Shuffleboard 10,00C
Well Building Picnic Shelter 10,00(
Sod/Seed Football Field * 7,00C
Overlay Tennis Court 9,50C
CA THCART:
Wanning House, Picnic Shelter 28,000
Overlay Tennis Court 9,00C
MANOR:
Overlay Tennis Courts 8,500
West Rink Light 8,50C
SlL VERWOOD:
Wanning House, Picnic Shelter 30,00<:
FREEMAN:
Building North - Loan 50,00(
Picnic Shelter & Picnic Area* - 25,00(
(Protect # 96-C)
Install Drinking Fountains* - 10,OOC
(Proiect # 96-G)
Tennis courts(2) 50,OOC
Extend Lot So. Toward TH7 5,00C
OTHER:
Park Grills, Pads & Permanent Trash Cans 6,00C
at Cathcart, Manor & Silverwood
Landscaping: Freeman - Reseed east side 10,00(
of south playstructure and north end of -
volleyball; Reseed around fields #1,2 & 3;
Replace Arbor Day tree (North). Manor-
Topsoil and seed west side of tennis court
and west side of warming house.
Silverwood - Repair turf by parking
lot/walkway area. * (Project # 96-E)
TOT AL EXPENSES $ 150,QOC $ 59,QOC $9,500 $ 28,000 $
.
.
* 1996 Projects rebudgeted for 1997
Updated 4/3/97
29
The Funding Source Summary - Park Capital Fund illustrates where funds will come from
to pay for the improvements scheduled on the PCIP. Note that the "projects/expenditure"
line corresponds with the "total expenses" line on the PCIP.
"
,
.
. . P~RK FUNDING SOUR€ESUMMARY- ",.i'" /."....,
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Fund Balance. Jan 1 139,461 66,934 40.281 58,795 61.735
Park Dedication Fees 45,000 15,000 10,000 10.000 10,000
General Fund Contribution 20,000 10,000 - --- ---
Donations 3,500 --- - -- --
General Fund Balance
S ports Organizations - park 10,000 11,900 13,600 15,300 17,500
Maint.
Parks Foundation-Park 2,000 4,000 -. 6,000 8,000 10,000
Imo.
Parks Foundation - BIde - -- 10.000 10,000 10,000
ProiectslExpenditures (150,000) (59,000) (9.500) (28,000) (30,000)
Tfr to General Fund - (10,000) (11,900) (13.600) (15,300) (17.500)
Maim:
futerest fucome 6,973 3,347 2.014 2,940 3,087
Fund Balance Dee 31 66.934 40,281 58,795 61,735 64,822
Designated for Freeman (2,000) (6,000) ( 12,000) (20,000) (30,000)
Park (Cumulative)
Undesign. Fund Balance, 64,934 34,281 46,795 41,735 34,822
Dec 31
The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to fmance improvement in the city's
park system. Revenues are derived from park dedication fees from land subdivisions
within the City. budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and the Shorewood
Parks Foundation. Expenditures shown are for improvements funded from these sources.
Fund balances will be allocated to future park improvements.
.
\"
Updated 4/3/97
30
.
.
To:
Mayor and City Council
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
n~
.~
From:
Date:
April 10, 1997
Re:
Clarification to Park Commission on Snowmobile Issue
There was some confusion at the last Park Commission meeting regarding precisely what is
expected of the Park Commission in regard to the snowmobile review. Park Commission
liaison Jennifer McCarty plans on discussing this with the Council at the Council meeting.
Between now and the next meeting, please consider what it is specifically you would like
the Park Commission to do. These questions might be of help to you:
1. Do you expect the Park Commission to make general observations and
recommendations regarding implementation of the plan?
2. Should they analyze the data for the 1996-97 season and make comments?
3. Should they determine what it would take to improve the program?
4. Do you want speeific recommendations on the Timber Lane access and the LRT
side trail issue?
5. Do you want them to take public input on their discussions, or is it premature at
this point until the Council has had an opportunity to review their work?
~5b
'.
.
~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Pisula called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Pisula, Commissioners Borkon, Kolstad, Turgeon; Council Liaison O'Neill
and Planning Director Nielsen
Commissioners Champa, Foust and Lizee
Absent:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Turgeon moved, Borkon seconded to approve the March 4~ 1997, Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes as submitted. Motion passed 4/0.
1. DISCUSSION - REGULATION OF ADULT USES
Nielsen explained the City Attorney felt in order to meet the provisions of the First Amendment the
City must identify approximately five percent of a commercial zoning district where adult use
establishments could locate. He further explained Shorewood has a very limited commercial base
with less than one percent of the total land area devoted to commercial use. Nielsen reported the
Council will be considering a six month moratorium on adult uses at the March 24th meeting which
will provide an opportunity for further consideration of this matter.
Commissioner Borkon requested the definition of adult uses. Nielsen provided the various
definitions of adult uses as well as the definition of an adult book store. Commissioner Borkon
questioned the adult area of the Video Update store. Nielsen stated the ordinance is written in such
a way so as to allow adult areas provided a percentage of the area or gross sales are not achieved
through that segment of their marketing. Chair Pisula inquired whether there is a provision relative
to isolating that particular material from under age people. Nielsen stated the ordinance regulating
the use addresses the accessibility of the material.
Nielsen stated the Planning Commission is being asked to review zoning and licensing regulations.
He commented it is reasonable to establish radiuses to sensitive locations such as churches, liquor
stores, and day care centers. The next study session will be to review possible locations as well as
the way in which the ordinances are written. Impact studies will be reviewed and public hearings
will be held relative to the zoning ordinance.
Chair Pisula inquired as to the setting of licensing fees for this type of business. Nielsen stated the
fee for licensing must be reasonably associated with the cost of monitoring or controlling that
particular use.
Chair Pisula inquired relative to display of adult materials as well as associated signage. Nielsen
explained these issues could be controlled. Council Liaison O'Neill commented on Internet related
activities pertaining to adult uses. Commissioner Borkon questioned the regulation of content.
Nielsen explained the City cannot determine what types of materials are allowed or depicted.
~
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 18, 1997 - PAGE 2
2. DISCUSSION - ZONING REQUIREMENTS - FENCES
Nielsen stated that to date, fences have been treated as accessory uses. Recently application was
made to place a fence on a vacant lot. The applicant was advised he would need to combine the
two lots and would not be allowed to fence a vacant lot.
Upon research by the City Attorney, it was noted the ordinance does not refer to fences as an
accessory use or a permitted use. Nielsen explained the ordinance states if it is not specifically
listed as a permitted use, it is specifically prohibited. Nielsen inquired whether the Planning
Commission has a concern with fences not being considered as an accessory use. He noted
storage buildings and docks as well as a number of other accessory uses with less visual impact
than a fence are controlled.
Commissioner Borkon noted she does not have much of a concern with this, however, she noted a
C.U.P. or a variance could address this issue with each application being considered on an
individual basis. Nielsen felt there to be two ways to handle this matter. There are height
restrictions which apply as well as site distance requirements for a corner lot. He noted that to
date, fences had not been allowed on a vacant lot, however, as of the recent application they are .'
being allowed. If fences are to be addressed in the zoning, it would be as an accessory use.
Nielsen commented an application requesting a special type of fence could be handled as a C.U.P.
He suggested fences could be allowed on vacant properties under a C. U.P. with the provision the
applicant must own the house on the adjoining lot. A further condition could be to require an
agreement which would state upon a sale of the lot, the fence would be removed or a house built
within a specified period of time.
Commissioner Turgeon expressed concern that the fenced lot would not be mowed and
maintained. Commissioner Borkon felt when an application is received, the Planning Commission
could then ascertain why the applicant is requesting a fence and question the applicant's intentions
relative to upkeep of the lot.
The consensus was to consider an ordinance amendment relative to fences. Chair Pisula stated he
would be interested in the suggestion of a C.D.P. Nielsen will bring this matter back to the next
study session for further review and discussion.
.
Commissioner Borkon raised the issue of traffic on Radisson Road and questioned where it is
placed on the priority list. Nielsen stated the priority list will be reviewed and revised at the next
Planning Commission meeting.
3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None
4. REPORTS
Commissioner Borkon noted she has received telephone calls relative to the antennas mounted on
the water tower at Waterford. The person who called, expressed concern relative to the waves
which are emitted from the antennas and stated the waves are similar to those used in lithotripsy.
One of the comments Commissioner Borkon received is that there is significant scientific proof
these type of antennas emit waves which are harmful. In addition, noise can at times be heardremitting from the RF's. The caller stated there is documented evidence the noise being emitted
does affect humans.
..
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 18, 1997 - PAGE 3
Commissioner Borkon noted the applicants had been thoroughly questioned at the public hearing
relative to any available scientific proof to support the fact the antennas 'lIe not harmful.
Commissioner Borkon stated such evidence is available, she would like to revisit this issue.
Nielsen explained that federal law notes studies have been completed and the opposite conclusion
reached. The Telecommunications Act prohibits cities from refusing the antennas based upon that
basis. Nielsen noted antennas are allowed on the water towers, however, the ordinance prohibits
the construction of a free standing tower.
The caller raised concern there is scientific data which provides that the waves affect the molecular
makeup of the water. Nielsen pointed out the city cannot adopt regulations which effectively
prohibit the antennas. He stated this information should be routed to the attention of the various
senators and legislators for their consideration.
Commissioner Borkon expressed concern she is receiving calls after the study session and public
hearings have been held and in which there were no concerns raised. She felt the monthly
newsletter would assist in this issue of communication.
.
The Planning Commission discussed the meeting which was held with the Council and
representatives of the Metropolitan Council.
Council Liaison O'Neill commented on the meeting with Senator Oliver and Representatives
Sykora and Workman which was held on Friday, March 14th.
Commissioner Kolstad inquired whether the City receives literature which would be of interest to
the Planning Commission and asked whether the Commissioners could view these periodicals or if
subscriptions could be provided to the Commissioners.
Nielsen suggested routipg the issues of Zoning News which he receives regularly. He stated he
would also investigate the possibility of obtaining subscriptions for the members of the
Commission. Council Liaison O'Neill stated he would be interested in receiving a list of the
publications which the City receives along with a brief description of each.
Commissioner Turgeon pointed out the reference to the Minnetonka Elementary School on the
telephone list should be changed to Minnewashta Elementary School.
.
Nielsen reported on a hearing notice which is being sent out relative to a hearing which will take
place next month. He provided a copy of the legal notice which will be published in the
newspaper. A second version of the notice was reviewed which contains a paragraph explaining
the request in simpler terms. A third version resembling an invitation was also reviewed. The
Commission was in favor of this particular notice. Commissioner Kolstad felt this version to be
more user friendly. Nielsen also noted a special mailing envelope will be utilized which will state
that a public hearing notice is enclosed.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Turgeon moved, Kolstad seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:37 p.m. Motion
passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat
Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL BY SCOTT CABALKA TO
KEEP A NONCONFORMING DOCK
WHEREAS, Scott Cabalka (Appellant) is the owner of property located on
Christmas Lake Road, said property being described as:
"That part of Lot 186 lying north of Registered Land Survey no. 471, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota."; and
WHEREAS, based upon neighborhood complaints the property was inspected
and found to have a number of dock structures where no principle dwelling exists on the
lot; and
.
WHEREAS, having received a zoning violation letter from the City ordering
removal of the dock structures, James Cabalka has filed an application for an appeal on
behalf of Scott Cabalka to keep the docks; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the
Planning Commission on 3 September 1996 and, after deliberation, the Planning
Commission recommended denial of the appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their regular meeting held on 16 December 1996
reviewed the material submitted by the Appellant, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission, the Planning Director's staff report, dated 29 August 1996, which report is
on file in the Shorewood City Hall, and correspondence from various residents and
property owners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the Appellant's property is located in the R-IA1S zoning district which
requires that a principle dwelling be located on the lot in order to have a boat dock.
2. That the Appellant's property has inadequate size to build a home in
compliance with the requirements of the R-IA1S zoning district.
3. That prior to Scott Cabalka's ownership of the property, it was owned by
James Cabalka, who had previously owned an adjoining parcel to the south on which his
home was located.
4. That a survey prepared by Israelson & Associates in June of 1981 for James
Cabalka, has sufficient detail to show a dock on the Cabalka homestead parcel but does not
show any dock on the vacant, unbuildable parcel currently owned by Scott Cabalka.
5. That James Cabalka explains that the dock on the vacant parcel was not
shown on the 1981 survey because he directed the surveyor not to show it.
6. That in correspondence to the Shorewood Planning Commission, dated
3 March 1981, James Cabalka mentions a proposed use of the property including building
a small boat dock on the site without an established residence.
7. That in order for the dock in question to be a legal nonconforming use, the
dock had to have been constructed prior to 21 January 1965 and continuously maintained
since that date.
8. That the Appellant states that the dock was built prior to 21 January 1965
and has provided letters from past and present residents of Christmas Lake stating that a
dock had previously existed on the vacant parcel.
9. That letters have also been received from past" and present residents of
Christmas Lake disputing that the dock was built prior to 1965.
10. That review of available old aerial photos on file at the University of
Minnesota, the City of Shorewood and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
does not reveal a dock on the vacant parcel until Apri11985.
.
CONCLUSIONS
1 . That the Appellant has failed to provide adequate evidence demonstrating
that the dock currently located on the property existed before, and has been maintained
since, 21 January 1965.
2.
denied.
That the Appellant's appeal to keep the nonconforming dock is hereby
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
14th day of April, 1997.
.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
A'ITEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
2
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN APPEAL BY SCOTT CABALKA TO
KEEP A NONCONFORMING DOCK
WHEREAS, Scott Cabalka (Appellant) is the owner of property located on
Christmas Lake Road, said property being described as:
"That part of Lot 186 lying north of Registered Land Survey no. 471, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota."; and
WHEREAS, based upon neighborhood complaints .the property was inspected
and found to have a number of dock structures where no -principle dwelling exists on the
lot; and
.
WHEREAS, having received a zoning violation letter from the City ordering
removal of the dock structures, James Cabalka has filed an application for an appeal on
behalf of Scott Cabalka to keep the docks; and
. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the
Planning Commission on 3 September 1996 and, after deliberation, the Planning
Commission recommended denial of the appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their regular meeting held on 16 December 1996
reviewed the material submitted by the Appellant, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission, the Planning Director's staff report, dated 29 August 1996, which report is
on file in the Shorewood City Hall, and correspondence from various residents and
property owners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the Appellant's property is located in the R-INS zoning district which
requires that a principle dwelling be located on the lot in order to have a boat dock.
2. That the Appellant's property has inadequate size to build a home in
compliance with the requirements of the R-INS zoning district.
3. That prior to Scott Cabalka's ownership of the property j it was owned by
James Cabalka, who had previously owned an adjoining parcel to the south on which his
home was located.
4. That a survey prepared by Israelson & Associates in June of 1981 for James
Cabalka, has sufficient detail to show a dock on the Cabalka homestead parcel but does not
show any dock on the vacant, unbuildable parcel currently owned by Scott Cabalka.
5 . That James Cabalka explains that the dock on the vacant parcel was not
shown on the 1981 survey because he directed the surveyor not to show it.
.
.
6. That in correspondence to the Shorewood Planning Commission, dated
3 March 1981, James Cabalka mentions a proposed use of the property including building
a small boat dock on the site without an established residence.
7. That in order for the dock in question to be a legal nonconforming use, the
dock had to have been constructed prior to 21 January 1965 and continuously maintained
since that date.
8. That the Appellant states that the dock was built prior to 21 January 1965
and has provided letters from past and present residents of Christmas Lake stating that a
dock had previously existed on the vacant parcel.
9. That letters have also been received from.past and present residents of
Christmas Lake disputing that the dock was built prior to 1965.
10. That review of available old aerial photos on me at the University of
Minnesota, the City of Shorewood and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
does not reveal a dock on the vacant parcel until April 1985 .
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the Appellant has provided evidence to sufficiently demonstrating that
the dock currently located on the property existed before, and has been maintained since,
21 January 1965.
2.
granted.
That the Appellant's appeal to keep the nonconforming dock is hereby
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
14th day of April, 1997.
Tom Dahlberg, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
2
04/03/1~97 16:52 6124747594
RENEE PIERRO
PAGE 02
2Apri197
To the members of the Shorewood City Council:
My name is Michael Pierro. I spoke at the hearing involving the Cabalka issue. I wish
to make some observations.
.
-To the issue of a dock (usable) being continuously at this site. The answer Is simply
NO. Your planning department says NO, I, who own property 40' away say NO. and at
least two other neighbors (Fayfield & Benson) say NO. I read .both Bill Mady and
George Noren's letters and neither says yes. Both agree the dock WAS there in the
earlier years. I doubt neither would be aware of its continuous existence, particularly if
under the water or hidden by weeds (160' dock hidden by weeds?). Also, neither Dves
by this property nor pass by it frequently.
I suggest all of you get In your car and drive by the site. You will note
THERE ARE NO WEEDs.. Irs WINTER AND THEY DIE I Yes there are some
stocks , but these are relatively recent (Blue Strife-not in our area In the late 70'S or
early 80's). You can clearly see the dock AND SO YOU CAN FOR SEVEN
MONTHS OF THE YEAR. So when Bob Fayfield said he went by the area
thousands of times and didn't see a dock IT WASN'T because of the weeds; It was
because no dock was present.
...Qn this next issue, I dearly hope I am wrong. I left with the distinct feeling that our
Mayor, though he publlcfy stated this was a fact finding meeting, clearly was biased
toward the Cabalka's and has his mind made up. He went out of his way, in fact LEO
Mr. Cabafka into testimony unrelated to the continuous existence 01 the dock. I was
reprimanded by the mayor for discussing the Noo.Residency Issue of the owners (who
are not Jim or Betty). Yet shortly afterward the mayor sollclted more ancient testimony,
even after he said it was a given the dock did exist In the 50's and 60'S. Pictures from
the 50's were distributed and a disCl./ssion of weeds prevailed.
. If this is true it bodes ill for our city.
I wish yeu all well.
Michael Pierro ~
5880 Christmas Lake Road
Shorewcod, Mn 55331
4747471
.
.
April 08, 1997
lfiil ~ ((; ~ n \V7 ~ ~I!.'
,~ APR 1 0 1997 ~l
IBy_ I
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club RD.
Shorewood, MN 55331
Attn: Mayor Tom Dahlberg
City Council Members
Dear City Officials,
I would like to comment on .the Issue regarding the dispute about
the Cabalka property on Christmas Lake. I was raised in this
neighborhood as a child and knew the Cabalka's, as my parents we.re
friends with them. Therefore it is hard for me to express the opinion,
that I feel that they are not being completely honest in they're
representation of the facts regarding the dock on this particular parcel
of land. The dock that they used when they lived there, ( at least until
1968 ) was located on the parcel that they're house sat on,
approximately were Kuester's is now.
Personally I am opposed to the precedence being set, allowing
someone not living on or even near the lake, not to mention not even in
the City of Shorewood, having only a piece of land with a dock. I would
hate to see the results of such a precedence. There would be nothing
to stop someone from selling off a piece of their lakeshore land to
friends, relatives or just the highest bidder. Is there not a city
ordinance that is supposed to prevent this very thing? If so, why is
there even a question as to what should be done?
I strongly urge all of you, to disallow the request to keep the dock!
steven W. M rtin
5750 Christmas Lk. Rd.
Shorewood, MN. 55331
470-9585
MAYOR
Tom Dahlberg
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Jennifer McCarty
Jerry O'Neill
John Garfunkel
5755 COUNTRY CLUB. ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927. (612) 474-3236
FAX (612) 474-0128. www.state.neVshorewood. cityhall@shorewood.state.net
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
Mayor and City Council
James Hurm, City Administrator
(}J~/
~
FROM:
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works
.
DATE:
March 10, 1997
RE: Stormwater Management Plan and Aerial Topography
Municipalities have 2 years from the approval date of the Watershed District's Storm water
Management Plan by the Board of Water and Soil Resources to have their plans updated and
approved by the appropriate Watershed Districts in their cities. The City of Shorewood has two
districts. Most of Shorewood lies in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) with the
remaining portion lying in the Riley-Purgatory-BluffCreek Watershed District (RPBCWD). The
MCWD's stormwater plan is up for approval next week by the Board of Water and Soil Resources.
.
As part of this update, the City of Shorewood is in need of aerial topography which shows the
contour elevations of the land. This will allow proper determination of runoff rates and drainage
patterns throughout the City.
Because of the estimated cost of aerial topography is approximately $45,000, the City Council has
directed staff to seek alternatives to having the City mapped. Staff is currently checking with
various agencies that may have performed aerial topography over the past years that may be utilized
to update Shorewood's stormwater management plan.
At the time of this report, there were some mapping alternatives that were. still being considered by
the MCWD. Since these alternatives are still being explored, I will report back to the City Council
during the Monday night City Council meeting. In addition, this will enable me to incorporate
feedback received during the Lake Area Mayor's Summit Meeting being conducted on April 10 at
Shorewood City Hall.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
t/-7
~
To:
From:
Mayor and City Council
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
)l/.1...f
. I /
I . '
,/J
Date:
April 10, 1997
Schedule of Work Session Items
Re:
.
Monday. May 5
.
Monday, May 19
Comprehensive Plan Review:
· Community Facilities Section
· Land Use - Senior Housing Section
CIP Items:
· Water System - second review
. Sanitary Sewer - first review
Discuss Police Contract Renewal
Discussion of Citizen Participation at Council Meetings
& Open Forums
Comprehensive Plan Review:
· Transportation Section
CIP:
· Streets - first review
. Trails - first review
. Community Facilities - first review
· Equipment - second review
Review of City Goals, Values and Review of Priorities
Established for 1997
Comprehensive Plan Review:
. Land Use Section
CIP:
. Stormwater Management - second review
. Sanitary Sewer - second review
. Community Facilities - second review
. Streets - second review
. Trails - second review
These are items on the "waiting list." City Council members may have other items to add to this list:
· Discussion of Citizen Participation at Council Meetings and Open Forums
· Request for Joint Meeting with Park Commission on a Community Festival
"'
,-If ;;"c:
/"
.
CKNO
20526
20527
20528
20529
20530
20531
20532
20533
20534
20535
20536
20537
20538
20539
20540
20541
20542
20543
20544
20545
20546
20547
20548
20549
20550
20551
20552
20553
20554
20555
20556
20557
20558
20559
20560
20561
20562
20563
20564
20565
20566
.
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 14, 1997 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 21,1997
TO WHOM ISSUED
US POSTAL SERVICE
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
US POSTMASTER
US WEST
NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
US POSTMASTER
PERA
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
ANOKA CO SUPPORT/COLLECT
PERA
MEDICA
HEALTH PARTNERS
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO
AFSCME COUNCIL 14
AFSCME COUNCIL 14
MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
ANCHOR PAPER CO
CONNIE BASTYR
KATHLEEN HEBERT
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
DREW KRIESEL
BRADLEY NIELSEN
JOSEPH PAZANDAK
CITY OF TONKA BAY
US WEST
WASTE MANAGEMENT
GTE DIRECTORIES
GRIFFIN COMPANIES
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
TOWLE REAL ESTATE CO
THERESA NAAB
NORTHERN STATES POWER
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS
DAVID SKRIEN
BELLBOY CORPORATION
A..JRR:SE
POSTAGE FOR METER
AIR TIME
APRIL NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
COMMUNICATIONS
REFUND H2O METER HORN
UQUORIWINE FREIGHT
UQUORIWINE
1 ST QUARTER UIB POSTAGE
PEPA
DEFERRED CXJMP
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID
APRIL PERA LIFE INSURANCE
APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE
APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE
APRIL DENTAL INSURANCE
APRIL SIT DISABILITY
APRIL LIFE INSURANCE
APRIL DELTA DENTAL
APRIL UNION DUES
STATE TAX WITHHELD
COPY PAPERlNEWSLETTER INSEffi
MILEAGE
SEC 125 REIMB
FEB. PRISONER EXPENSE
MARCH JANITORIAL
SEC 125 REIMB
MILEAGE
APRIL RENT-TB LIQUOR
COMMUNICATIONs/ADVERTISING
WASTE REMOVAL
ADVERTISING
APRIL RENT/CAM RE TX ADJ 96
FR8GHT
UQUORIWINE PURCHASES
APRIL RENT -8HOREWOOD PLAZA
WINTER QTR TUITION REIMB
UTILITIES
SUPPLIES
ESCAOWREFUND
LIQUOR PURCHASES
AMOUNT
$1,500.00
106.89
557.82
790.09
20.00
1 70.40
964.36
482.68
2,451.39
847.37
929.00
139.44
45.00
5,353.45
2,912.51
585.63
94.50
87.60
224.00
124.50
1,305.24
522.98
11.66
120.00
140.00
230.00
100.00
71.13
1,000.00
706.80
208.51
39.00
8,747.33
21.60
1,650.76
3,358.80
265.00
5,378.42
1 31 .64
150.00
8,130.33
Page 1
.
.
CKNO
20567
20568
20569
20570
20571
20572
20573
20574
20575
20576
20577
20578
20579
20580
20581
20582
20583
foe
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 14, 1997 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 21,1997
TO WHOM ISSUED
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY
DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO
LAKE REGION VENDING CO
LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS
LEEF BROS
MARK VII
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
NORTH STAR ICE
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
THE WINE COMPANY
WINE MERCHANTS
PURFOSE
MIsc/sUPPUES
BEERlMISC PURCHASES
BEERlMISC PURCHASES
L1QUORIWINElMISC PURCHASES
L1QUORIWINElBEER PURCHASES
MISC PURCHASES
ADVERTISING
MATS
BEERlMISC PURCHASES
FR8GHT
MISC PURCHASES
WINE PURCHASES
L1QUORIWINE PURCHASES
LIQUOR PURCHASES
BEERlMISC PURCHASES
WINE PURCHASES
WINE PURCHASES
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
Page 2
AMOUNT
$394.71
5,592.50
14,412.10
14,131.88
11,046.18
1,998.30
567.00
26.20
5,451.60
302.40
223.20
1,027.49
10,948.61
749.13
17,791.25
969.20
75.00
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
APR. 14, 1997 COUNCIL MTG
CHECKI VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION
~----~-- ------------------------- ----------------------~-
20584 A8M EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
20585 ABDO, ABDO, AND EICK
*** TOTAL
20586 ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
20587 8IFFS, INC.
eO.588 BRAUN PUMP & CONTROLS
20589 CBI NA CON, INC
96 YEAR END AUDIT
96 YEAR END AUDIT
96 YEAR END AUDIT
96 YEAR END AUDIT
96 YEAR END AUDIT
96 YEAR END AUDIT
FOR ABDO, ABDO, AND EICK
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
SEI;.JER REPAIR
20590 COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM REPAIR SIGNALLT-7j41
WA TER TOWER CONSTRUCTION
20.S,91 CROSSTOWN'-'OCS, INC.
20592 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF
*** TOTAL
20593 E-Z F<ECYCL I NG INC.
20594 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC.
.0595 FINA FLEET FUELING
20596 GOVERNMENT TF<AINING SVC
COFFEE
DEPT.
AMOUNT
CITY G~ll~
28.S M 22
PROF SER 3,600.00
WATER DE 480.00
SEWER DE 480.00
-------- 480.00
-------- 480.00
-------- 480~OO
6,000.00
CITY GAR
44.78
PARKS &
122 H 5.2
SEI;.JER DE
424,.01
-------- 25~203.58
TRAF CON
116..4.1
MUN BLDG
11~1. 96
1ST QTR FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PRO 35,962.50
4TH QTR 96 WATER PURCHAS WATER DE 2,245,.94
FOR EXCELSIOR-CITY OF 38,208.44
MARCH r-<ECYCLING
RECYCLIN
4,255.00
50.00
CONTAINER RENTAL-WA CHEM WATER DE
.FUEL
97 NEW URBANISM CONF
20597 JIM HATCH SALES CO. PARK SUPPLIES
SHOP SUPPLIES
*** TOTAL FOR JIM HATCH SALES CO.
20598 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAL VERIFICATIONS
20599 .HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
*** TOTAL
CITY Gf~R
433.61
PL AN!'l I NG
.103.00
PARKS & 250.43
CITY GAR 256.78
507.21
GEN GOV'T
104.40
SC FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMEN GEN GOVT 78.00
SC FOR SjA-'WATER WATER DE 228.00
SC FOR S/A-SEWER SEWER DE 102.00
SC: FOR S/A-RECYCLING f-<ECYCL I N 81.00
SC FOR S/A-STORM WATER _.._...-0____- 120.00
FOR HE~~NEPIN COUNTY TREA 609.00
20600 HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY SMALL TOOLS
EQUIPMENT MAINT
*** TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPAN
20601 KENNEDY & GRAVEN
CITY GAR 273.71
CITY GAR 178.17
45.1.88
FEB LEGAL-GENERAL PROF SER
FEB LEGAL-SMITHTOWN H20 --------
5, l"E12 . 66
2,179.00
Page 3
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
APR. 14, .1997 COUNCIL MTG
CHECKI VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
-------- ------------------------- ------------------------ -------- -----------
FEB LEGAL-BLDR/BADGH20
FE8 LEGAL-7/XMAS LK RD
*** TOTAL FOR KENNEDY & GRAVEN
20602 KAR PRODUCTS
SHOP SUPPLIES
20603 LK MTKA CONSERV. DISTRICT 2ND QTR BUDGET
20604 . LARK IN, HOFFMAr~ , Df~L Y . . . J AN GEN LEGAL/LITIGATION
FEB GENERAL LEGAL
FE8 LEGAL REBILL
FEB LEGAL REBILL
*** TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL
.06050 r1r.:-'lMA
20606 OFFICE DEPOT
LUNCHEOi'l
OFFICE SUPPLIES
20607 MINNCOMM PAGING
PAGEf-<
-------- 820.00
PROF SER 60.00
8,241.66
CITY GAR
COUNCIL
PROF SER
PROF SER
4~187.20
ADMIN
GEN GOVT
CITY GAR
20608 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICE CONN FEE-1ST QTR WATER DE
20609 MN SUN PUBLICATIONS LEGAL ADS
LEGAL ADS
*** TOTAL FOR MN SUN PUBLICATIONS
20610 MINNEGASCO
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
FOR MINNEGASCO
.
***
TOTAL
20611 MINNETONKA-CITY OF
PW SAFETY TRAINING
20612 WM. MUELLER & SONS~ INC. SAND
ASPHALT
*** TOTAL FOR WM. MUELLER & SONS,
20613 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE
SHOP SUPPLIES
20614 NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
CATCH BASIN GRATES
20615 ORR,SCHELEN,MAYERON/ASSOC OLD MARKET RDTRAIL
20616 RED WING'S MOBIL SERVICE TIRE REPAIR LABOR
20617 SATELLITE SHELTERS, INC CATHCART WARMING HOUSE
20618 SHORE WOOD TREE SERVICE TREE TRIMMING
Page 4
45.950
4,207.508
2,915.40
802.60
433,.20
36.00
16.00
513.85
4.26
J.,289.00
GEN GOVT 16.80
-------~ 136"80
153.60
WATER DE
WATER DE
LIQUOR
WATER DE
CITY GAR
PARKS &
MUN SLOG
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
CITY GAR
356.20-
103.2.1
114.64
.1.13.77
649.29
48.26
172.98
49.24
81.01
976.20
116.49
SNOW & I 1,0750.87
STREETS 5010.11
1,585.98
CITY GAR
CITY GAR
PARKS &'
TREE MAl
68.09
.129.93
5,915.25
70.50
398.05
3.088.50
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
APR. 14, 1997 COUNCIL MTG
CHECKW VHmOf~ NAME DESCf.UPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
____0____ ___~M_____________________ ------------------------ -------- -----------
20619 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE SLOG MAINT
SHOP SUPPLIES
*** TOTAL FOR SHORE WOOD TRUE VALUE
20620 SUPERAMERICA
FUEL
20621 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC COUNCIL MTG MINUTES
PLANN COMM MTG MINUTES
*** TOTAL FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITE
20622 TONKA PRINTING CO. ENVELOPES
.::0623 TSP/EOS
L0624 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES
SR CTR ENG/ARCHITECTS
UNIFORMS
CITY GAR
CITY GAR
.10..89
CITY GAR
9 . ~37
.1.52
372.81
GEN GOVT 6.15..00
PLANNING 97.00
7.12.00
GEN GOVT 92.66
CITY GAR
BULK MAILING PERMIT 128 GENGOVT
20625 US POSTMASTER
20626 WILLIAMS STEEL AND HARDWA ifULGATE F~EP;UR
***
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
***
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
.
CITV GAR
1.10,890..84
247,273.42
930.71
440.26
170..00
118.40
C H .- C K ,.... .- G I S .... c. R
c. r<; C. 1
CHECK CHECK Ef1PLOYEE t-J.Al"iE CHECK CHECK
TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT
Cm1 4 01 97 80 I/JEr-lDY "" At--!DERSON 211692 .582..2(;
.,:).
COM 4 01 97 101 SCOTT M. BAFHLETT 2.11693 31..17
COM 4 01 97 .108 BECCA D. BAST'v'R 2.11694 .S9..S'9
COM 4 01 97 .1.10 cOt-.n.-J. I E D. BASTYR 2.116';'5 333..97
eOM 4 0.1 97 .1.15 U~I/JRENCE A. BROItJt-.j 2.1.1696 1433.13
COi"j 4 01 97 .150 HE(~ THER -.. BLECHTA 2.1.1697 6.1 .. 48
H.
cm1 4 01 97 32.S P,NGELA 11. COLE 2.11698 281.24
COM 4 0.1 97 500 CHAi"-<LES S. DI;\iIS 2.1.1699 794..97
em1 4 01 97 775 JAMES C. EI;KINS 2.1.1700 717.60
cm1 4 0.1 97 .1.190 KATHLEEN f~ .. HEBERT 2.1.170.1 662.54
COM 4 0.1 97 .1400 Pp,TRICIA R. HELGESEN 21.1702 6.17 . 4.::-
cm1 4 0.1 97 .14.15 SHf.'tI/.jN D. HEMPEL 2.1.1703 .184..43
COM 4 01 97 15.50 J(;1-1ES e. HURM 2.1.1704 1748.30
C0i1 4 01 97" .160.1 BRII~N D. JAKEL 2.1.1705 70..13
. cm'! 4 0.1 97 .1700 .JEFFREY A. JENSEN 2.1.1706 963..1.5
COM 4 0.1 97 1800 DE1..-jNIS D.. .JOHNSON 2.11707 8.14.20
em1 4 0.1 97 2.100 ItJ I LL I 1;/1 r- ,JOSEPHSON 2.1.1708 632.94
1- .
cor"'! 4 0.1 97 2500 SUSAN M. U;TTERNER 2.1.1709 642.68
cm1 4 0.1 97 2SI.:'() PETER I,..) . LENZEN 2.1.1710 7c\.. 33
C0l1 4 0.1 97 2800 .JOSEPH P.. LUGOWSKI 2.1.17.1.1 845.59
C0l1 4 0.1 97 2805 .] p,SON R. LUND 2.11712 291.80
cm1 4 0.1 97 2900 RUSSELL f"-< . l-1ARI"-<ON 2.11713 32..35
COM 4 01 97 3000 THERESA L. NM~B 2.1.17.14 602..38
cm"'!' 4 01 97 3.100 L(~I,..jREi".J.CE ." NICcur1 2.1.1715 .1078.06
;-t ...
cm'! 4 0.1 97 3400 BRADLEY .~ NIELSEN 2.1.17.16 873.70
..J .
cm"'! 4 0.1 97 3500 JOSEPH E.. Pf~ZANDAK 2.1.17.17 1086..47
cm'! 4 0.1 97 3580 CHRISTOPHER J. POUNDER 2.1.1718 789.34
cm1 4 01 97 3600 DI;t-.J.IEL J. R(.~i'.jDALL 2.1.17~L9 949..40
cm1 4 01 97 3610 JON c. RATHKE 2.1.1720 12.99
COM 4 0.1 97 3701 BR I l~r'J. r1.. ROERICK 2.1.172.1 75..89
. cor1 4 01 97 3:300 i-~L(~I'-'J. J. i"-<OLEK 2.1.1722 1.142..83
COM 4 01 97 38.1.5 MICf.-1(;EL .J. RUFFENI~CH 2.1.1723 .126.. 06
Cor1 4 0.1 97 3900 CHRISTOPHER E.. SCH11 I 0 2.11724 465.88
cor"'! 4 0.1 97 3910 R CONRI;O SCHMID 21.172.5 86..58
Cm1 4 0.1 97 4190 DANA G. SHAlpj 2.1.1726 2.17..89
Cm1 4 0.1 97 4577 P(;11EU~ T.. TURNQUIST 2.1.1727 666.0.1
COM 4 01 97 4600 BEVERLY J. VON FELDT 2.11728 79.84
COM 4 01 97 4750 RALPH A. I,..JEHLE 2.1.1729 67.1.73
****TOT~~LS****
2()802 .. 29
Page 6