061607 CC WS AgP
~
1
Revised Notice
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
MONDAY, JUNE 16, 1997
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
The City Council will meet at 6:00 p.m. at the site of the Watten Ponds development near
5370 Eureka Road to review issues of non-compliance with the development agreement.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE WORK SESSION
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
2. DISCUSSION OF CITY WATER POLICIES
3. REVIEW OF SHADY ISLAND BRIDGE OPTIONS
4. ADJOURN
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
MONDAY, JUNE 16, 1997
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1 . CONVENE WORK SESSION
A. Roll Call
B. Review Agenda
2. DISCUSSION OF CITY WATER POLICIES
3. ADJOURN
City Council Work Session
June 16, 1997
Water Policy Questions
1) 1.1. Water is available in the street, however, at the time it was put in one
resident chose not to hook up. At a later date, when he want to hook
up to municipal water, what should he pay?
,
Existing Policy: Existing lot - $5,000 if not previously assessed; new lot - $10,000 upon
creation of a new lot.
Suggested Policy:
1 . 2 . Is there a need to put it on parity with what original costs to
neighboring properties were?
Existing Policy: Existing lot - $5,000 ifnot previously assessed; new lot - $10,000 upon
creation of a new lot.
Suggested Policy:
1 .3 . What is the money collected used for?
Existing Policy: Water system infrastructure
Suggested Policy:
2) 2.1. Water is on Smithtown Road. Smithtown Circle is a cul-de-sac off
of Smithtown Road with five homes on it. If they submit a 100%
petition for water, what would they pay per unit?
Existing Policy: $5,000
Suggested Policy:
2.2. What factors would be used to determine this fee?
Existing Policy: Flat unit fee set by ordinance,
Suggested Policy:
.
2.3. Would they pay any toward the cost of the infrastructure?
Existing Policy: Potentially
Suggested Policy:
3) 3.1. Water is on Smithtown Road. Smithtown Circle is a cul-de-sac off
of Smithtown Road with five homes on it. A petition from four of
the five neighbors is submitted for water.
Existing Policy: Allfive would pay $5,000
Suggested Policy:
3.2. Do the four pay the entire cost of extension?
Existing Policy: No, all five pay toward the project cost
Suggested Policy:
3.3. What if the fifth resident wants to hook up at a later date, what
would the charge to that property be?
Existing Policy: None, they have already paid their assessment.
Suggested Policy:
4) A petition is received for water in an area where it is not available. A trunk
main would need to be extended to provide the service. What would the
cost be for each unit that petitioned for water?
Existing Policy: All lots would pay $5,000 once the project is deemedfeasible.
Suggested Policy:
5) 5.1. It has always been the City's policy to require commercial and multi-
family units to hook up to water within 90 days of it becoming
available. Should this policy continue?
Existing Policy: Yes.
Suggested Policy:
.
5 .2. If so, what would be the cost for water for these types of
development (example four unit multiple family)?
Existing Policy: $10,000 total existing; $20,000 total future.
Suggested Policy:
6) 6.1. If a developer of a new development submits a 100% petition for
municipal water, will the water be extended to the area?
Existing Policy: Yes, iffeasible.
Suggested Policy:
6 .2. At what cost?
Existing Policy: $10,000 per unit for residential.
Suggested Policy: