092396 CC Reg AgP
...
"
.
SCANNED
CJ:TY COUNCJ:L REGULAR MEETJ:NG
CJ:TY OF SHOREWOOD
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCJ:L CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
Immediately following the regular portion of the meeting, the
Council will convene in Work Session format. No action will
be taken at this time.
AGENDA
1 . CONVENE CJ:TY COUNCJ:L MEETJ:NG
A. Roll Call
Stover
Benson
Shaw
McCarty
Mayor Bean
B. Review Agenda
2 . APPROVAL OF MJ:NUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 9,
1996 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B. City Council Work Session Minutes September 9, 1996
(Att.-#2B Minutes)
C. City Council Work Session Minutes September 16,
1996 (Att.-#2C Minutes)
3 .
items on
Therein:
CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve
Consent Agenda &: Adopt Resolutions
A. A Motion to Approve an Extension of a Conditional
Use Permit (Att.-#3A Planner's Memorandum)
Applicant: Jerry Grewe
Location: 4550 Enchanted Point
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Garbage
Hauler's License (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution)
4 . MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (Presentations are limited
to 3 minutes. No Council action will be taken.)
5 .
Report by Representative
PLANNJ:NG
A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding a Lot
Combination and Resubdivision (Att.-#5 Planner's
Memorandum)
Applicant:
Location:
Mark Sass
Lots 10, 11, 12, Block 11, Minnetonka
Manor
.'
.
'.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
PAGE 2 OF 2
6 . CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION APPROVING AN INVESTMENT
POLICY (Att.-#6 Proposed Policy)
7 . SNOWMOBILE TASK FORCE REPORT
A. A Motion to Accept the Report and Give Direction to
Staff Regarding Implementation Planning
B. Review of First Draft of Snowmobile Ordinance
Amendment (Att.-#7B Draft Ordinance)
8 . POLICY ON HOOKUP TO MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM
A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Regarding Policy on
Hookup to Municipal Water System (Att.-#8A Proposed
Resolution)
B. Review of First Draft of Ordinance Amendment
Section 903.05 Regarding Private Wells (Att.-#8B
Draft Ordinance)
9 . ADMINISTRATOR &: STAFF REPORTS
A. Engineer's Report on Kate Lynch-Bix Mailbox
B. Engineer's Report on Naomi Carlson Driveway at
25565 Smithtown Road
C. Report on I/I Grant Program (Att.-#9C Letter from
Metropolitan Council dated 9/10/96)
10. MAYOR &: CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
11. ADJOURN TO SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS ( At t . -
#11)
.
~.. .
.
SC4NNtD
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474.3236
Executive Summary
Shorewood City Council Meeting
Monday, September 23, 1996
A~enda Item 3A: Due to his wife's illness, Jerry Grewe has requested a one year extension of his
conditional use permit. His c.u.p. and a variance were granted in October 1995, and allow him to
build accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet and have two houses on one lot while the new
home is being built. The Planning Director recommends approval.
A~enda Item 3B: This is a resolution approving a refuse collector license for WTI Waste
Technology Inc. out of Crystal.
A~enda Item 5: Mark Sass proposes to combine four substandard lots on Minnetonka Boulevard
and resubdivide them into two conforming lots. The Planning Director recommended approval
subject to conditions, and the Planning Commission agreed unanimously. A resolution approving
the request will be presented at the 14 October Council meeting. .
A:ienda Item 6: This is an update of the City's Finance Policy. It specifically details the current
investment policies of the City. It should be formally be adopted by motion of the City Council.
A~enda Item 7 A: This motion would accept the Snowmobile Task Force Report and give specific
diI:ection to the Staff regarding implementation planning.
Agenda Item 7B: The frrst step in the implementation plan is to review a draft of the revised
snowmobile ordinance, which has been prepared by the City Attorney and can be reviewed in
detail at the meeting.
A~enda Item 8A: This resolution re-establishes City policy to not require hookup to the municipal
water system for single family residential properties.
Agenda Item 8B: This ordinance amendment it a clarification that the City does allow private wells
to be dug as well as maintained.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1.
CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DRAFT
Mayor Bean called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, McCarty, Shaw, Stover; City
Administrator Hurm; City Attorney Tim Keane; Planning Director Brad Nielsen;
Finance Director AI Rolek and Engineer Larry Brown.
Review Agenda
B.
.
Benson moved, Stover seconded to approve the agenda for September 9, 1996.
Motion passed 5/0.
C. Presentation of Appreciation Plaque to Steve Dzurak
Mayor Bean presented a Plaque of Appreciation to Steve Dzurak for over five years of service as
member of the Shorewood Park Commission. Mayor Bean thank Mr. Dzurak for the tremendous
amount of time and personal commitment he has given to the program. Mr. Dzurak encouraged
others to seek appointment to one of the commissions noting it is a very worthwhile endeavor.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
.
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 26, 1996
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to approve the City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes of August 26, 1996, as amended on Page 3, Item No.6, change to reflect
"Jeff Foust, Shorewood's Representative to the LMCC," rather than "Jeff Foust,
Planning Commissioner;" change references to "Commissioner Foust" to
"Representative Foust." Motion passed 5/0.
B. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes August 26, 1996
Stover moved, Shaw seconded to approve the City Council Work Session Meeting
Minutes of August 26, 1996, as amended to reflect Page 2, Paragraph 1, amend to
clarify, "Tentative discussions were held with respect to the budget, subject to a
final review. Three changes related to staffing positions with respect to the
office, a potential light equipment operator, and engineering which were created
as the result of internal promotions." Motion passed 5/0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Bean read the Consent Agenda for September 9, 1996.
McCarty moved, Benson seconded to approve the Motions on the Consent Agenda
and to adopt the Resolutions therein:
-I&~A
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 2
A. A Motion to Approve a three year Contract for Utility Maintenance
Services with Munitech beginning in 1997
B. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-81, "A Resolution
Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed
Assessment and Ordering an Assessment Hearing for Watermain
Project No. 95-16, Smithtown Road East"
C. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-82, "A Resolution
Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed
Assessment and Ordering an Assessment Hearing for Watermain
Project No. 95-14, Eureka Road"
E.
D. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-83, "A Resolution
Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed
Assessment and Ordering an Assessment Hearing for Watermain
Project No. 95-15, Smithtown Road South"
A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-84, "A Resolution
Approving a Change Order for Project No. 96-02, Minnewashta
Water Tower"
.
F. A Motion Approving 1997 Contract for Animal Control Services with
the City of Chanhassen and Authorizing Execution of Contract
G. A Motion Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-85, "A Resolution
Accepting Project No. 94-2, Old Market Road Sidewalk and
Authorizing Final Payment
Motion passed 5/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Councilmember Stover presented a concern from Kate Lynch-Bix whose artistic mailbox was
damaged-in the process of the watermain work on Eureka Road. City Engineer Brown explained .
the dump truck operator inadvertently backed into a section of mailboxes. Brown directed Ms.
Lynch-Bix to submit an estimate of the damages which was then forwarded to the contractor for
payment. Councilmember Stover requested City Staff keep in contact with Ms. Lynch-Bix to keep
her apprised of the situation. Mayor Bean asked for an update at the next meeting as to the actions
taken by the contractor with respect to the resolution of this matter.
5. CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING FINANCES FOR 1996 WATER
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A. Presentation by Springsted Regarding FinancingIBonding Recommendations
Bob Thistle, Springsted Inc., appeared and explained this matter in detail. He estimated the
interest rates will be approximately 5.6 percent on a 15 year issue. The bonds will be callable on
February 1, 2007. At that time they may be refmanced or repaid if sufficient revenues are
available.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 3
C:ouncilmember Stover pointed out the figures on Page 3 of the recommendations are slightly
dIfferent than Page 2 of the Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council. Mr. Thistle
clarified the resolution reflects the appropriate numbers.
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Providing for Issuance and Sale of $860,000
General Obligation Water Revenue Bond, Series 1996, for Improvements to the
Water System of the City
Benson moved, McCarty seconded approving RESOLUTION NO. 96-86, "A
Resolution Providing for Issuance and Sale of $860,000 General Obligation
Water Revenue Bond, Series 1996, for Improvements to the Water System of the
City. " Motion passed 5/0.
6 . PARKS - Report by Representative
A. Report on Park Commission Meeting of August 27, 1996
.
Councilmember McCarty reviewed the matters considered and actions taken by the Park
Commission at the meeting of August 27, 1996 (as detailed in the minutes of that meeting).
B. A Motion Authorizing Execution and Submittal of a Winter Use Permit for the SW
Regional LRT Trail
McCarty moved, Stover seconded authorizing execution and submittal of a Winter
Use Permit for the SW Regional LRT Trail. Motion passed 5/0.
C. A Motion Authorizing the Purchase of Park Signs and Transfer of Funds to the
Parks Foundation
Stover moved, Benson seconded authorizing the purchase of park signs from
Tonka Sign Crafters in the amount of $2,225 and transfer of funds to the Parks
Foundation. Motion passed 4/0. Councilmember Shaw abstained as Treasurer of the Parks
Foundation.
7. PLANNING - Report by Representative
. Commissioner Pisula addressed the Council and review the matters considered and actions taken
by the Planning Commission at the September 3, 1996, meeting (as detailed in the minutes of that
meeting) .
8. CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 25565 SMITHTOWN ROAD
A. Status Report on Safety Concerns Related to Abandoned Property
Planning Director Nielsen reviewed the matter in detail. Naomi Carlson appeared and stated she
had visited the property and felt the structure was well secured. She explained a Cancellation of
Contract for Deed has been filed. Ms. Carlson explained the tenant, Mr. Fox, had expressed a
desire to rehabilitate the property. In addition, he had made his payments on a regular basis. She
further explained she has potential plans in mind for the property. Ms. Carlson stated had she
received any notice with respect to the property she would have attended to this matter and
apologized for any problems created by the property. Ms. Carlson explained the property will
once again be titled to her and requested additional time to deal with the property.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 4
Mayor Bean noted when the property fIrst came to the attention of City Staff, four or fIve feet of
water existed in the basement with the electricity on at the time. He asked if the utilities had been
shut off. Ms. Carlson stated she would have the electricity turned off. Mayor Bean also suggested
the windows be sealed with plywood. Mayor Bean asked if Ms. Carlson would be taking
immediate steps to either sell the property or renovate it. Ms. Carlson stated it was her intention to
attempt a sale of the property. She noted she has spoken with several individuals with respect to a
sale of the property.
Councilmember McCarty stated she would be willing to give the property owner some time to deal
with this property. Councilmember Benson expressed concern with respect to safety. He felt it
would be acceptable to secure the windows and doorway with plywood as long as verillcation can
be made by City Staff to assure the structure has been secured for safety purposes.
Councilmember Benson expressed his concern the property represents a hazard and would like to
review this matter at the next Council meeting.
Mayor Bean asked for a review of the property by the Inspection Department to verify the property
has been secured and all utilities turned off. Mayor Bean recommended 30 days for Ms. Carlson
to act on this matter. Ms. Carlson stated she would like the electricity to remain in order to allow
clean up activity, however, Mayor Bean noted the presence of active utilities in this structure is a .
signifIcant safety concern.
Bean moved, Shaw seconded directing the property owner to secure the building
within seven to ten days to the satisfaction of the Inspection Staff and to act in
concert with the Building Official to secure the building and make it safe from a
utility standpoint. City Staff will not file a Condemnation for 30 days. Motion
passed 5/0.
B . A Motion Regarding Request to Abate Charges Levied
Ms. Carlson addressed the matter of legal fees which had been assessed. She stated they were
unnecessary and felt the City had acted prematurely. Ms. Carlson stated when it was brought to
her attention the sump pump had not been inspected, she made an appointment for this to be
accomplished. Ms. Carlson requested a rebate of $480 in legal fees as well as sump pump charges
which had been assessed. She further stated the legal fees were listed as clean up fees on her
statement and had she known they were legal fees she would have fIled a protest in a timely
manner.
.
Mayor Bean pointed out numerous attempts were made at notifIcation. Ms. Carlson stated she had
not received any notifIcation and thought possibly Mr. Fox had received them. Planning Director
Nielsen clarifIed the legal fees represent the fees for the Condemnation Orders.
Finance Director Rolek explained with respect to the sump pump fees that Mr. Fox had not
complied with any inspection requests since inception. Councilmember Benson stated it would be
his inclination to abate those charges since the sump pump is not working. He did not anticipate
the sump pump charges would become a burden resulting in a $2,000 or $3,000 penalty.
Councilmember Stover noted that obviously no one is living in the house. She stated Ms. Carlson
is the fee owner of the property as well as a resident and is aware of the sump pump ordinance.
Once she became aware of the inspection on her own home, she should have been aware of the
same requirement for her rental property. Ms. Carlson noted it had recently come to her attention
Mr. Fox had not been paying the property taxes.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 5
Mayor Bean inquired if Ms. Carlson was aware of the delinquent property taxes. She
acknowledged she had been aware of them, but had believed comments made by ML Fox that he
would make arrangements to bring the taxes current. Ms. Carlson stated her intent to bring the
taxes current with the proceeds of the sale.
Mayor Bean pointed out the issue is that Ms. Carlson had knowledge of a problem and should
have been more aware of what was happening with respect to the property. Ms. Carlson stated she
had been aware the taxes had not been paid and had been assessed. Mayor Bean pointed out this
was a notice to her to take a more proactive approach with respect to this situation. Ms. Carlson
commented she had been trying to be sympathetic to Mr. Fox's situation. She pointed out water
was not being pumped out into the sewer and did attempt to address this issue when she received
notice of it.
.
Councilmember Shaw suggested the issue be revisited in 30 days along with the issue of the safety
concerns of the property. He noted Ms. Carlson had been given additional time in which to
resolve this situation and his response to the charges will be the level of cooperation which is
evident at the 30-day review of this matter.
Shaw moved, Stover seconded to continue the request for abatement of charges
levied for 30 days and to discuss it in conjunction with the previous issue relating
to the safety of the property. Motion passed 5/0.
Ms. Carlson also requested the driveway to the property be replaced. She noted the driveway has
not been replaced since the watermain work was completed. City Engineer Brown clarified that
Ms. Carlson's property shares a driveway with the Kirschner auto facility. He stated City Staff
could not locate a single driveway to that property. Ms. Carlson stated the driveways are
adjoining, however it is not a shared driveway. City Administrator Hurm explained a video tape
had been made of the various driveways and trees prior to the start of the watermain project and
stated this would reflect the position of the driveway prior to construction.
Mayor Bean inquired if Ms. Carlson could produce a survey which would evidence the location of
the driveway. Ms. Carlson stated she would have only the application for a building permit which
reflects the location of the driveway. Mayor Bean recommended this item be reviewed at the next
meeting and directed staff to review the video and provide documentation back to the Council as to
this issue. City Engineer Brown stated he will check the property file for any evidence of this.
. Ms. Carlson stressed she needs a driveway now in order to work on this property.
Councilmember Benson noted this to be a separate issue which the contractor and City Staff are
currently working to resolve.
Mayor Bean explained these matters will be reconsidered at the October 14, 1996, meeting of the
City Council.
9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE 1997 PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND PROPOSED 1996
PROPERTY TAX LEVY
Finance Director AI Rolek reviewed this matter noting the consensus of the Council at the Work
Session on August 26, 1996, to present this resolution for approval. City Administrator Hurm
pointed out this resolution results in maintaining the City's tax rate for next year equal to the rate
for this year.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 6
McCarty moved, Stover seconded adopting RESOLUTION NO. 96-87, "A
Resolution Approving the 1997 Preliminary Budget and Proposed 1996 Property
Tax Levy." Motion passed 5/0.
10. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION AUTHORIZING VOLUNTARY
PAYMENT TO LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
TASK FORCE
City Administrator Hurm briefly explained this matter. Councilmember Shaw expressed his
opinion the City should participate with the voluntary payment. He further noted the City of
Shorewood had been a member of the Suburban Rate Authority some years ago and it was
determined through a long process of investigation that the City would no longer be a member of
this organization. Councilmember Shaw suggested City Staff research the Suburban Rate
Authority with respect to its function and how it is carried out. Hurm felt the free one year
membership was an aside which comes along with the voluntary contribution.
Councilmember Shaw explained the Suburban Rate Authority and noted approximately eight or
nine years ago, the City of Shorewood did not feel this organization was representative of the
City's interests. He recalled the City had some very specific reasons for discontinuing .
membership in this organization.
Shaw moved, McCarty seconded authorizing a voluntary payment to the League of
Minnesota Cities for Right-of-Way Task Force in the amount of $514 and
directing Staff to conduct a follow up on the Suburban Rate Authority to
determine if membership would be of value to the City. Motion passed 5/0.
11. ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF REPORTS
A. Report on Emergency Medical Response Quality Improvement Project
City Administrator Hurm reported the City has received a brief report from Hennepin County with
respect to paramedic response times to Shorewood residents. A concern was noted in that the City
of Shorewood is divided by the areas the paramedics respond to. The dividing line is Country
Club Road. Hennepin County responds from the east, but does not respond into the service area
of Ridgeview Medical Center in Waconia.
Hurm noted a number of responses exceed 10 minutes. The statute indicates the goal of the
response should be for 90 percent of the calls to be responded to within less than 10 minutes.
Since Shorewood is at the far end of the two response areas, the City will work with the service
providers to reach an agreement such that if Hennepin County cannot arrive at their far reaches in
10 minutes or less, they would then check with the Ridgeview Medical Center and, if they are
available, they will make that response. Hurm noted a good response has been received from both
agencies in trying to work together to accomplish this goal. He commended both organizations for
working with the City on this matter.
B. Report on Hassan Township Request
City Administrator Hurm explained a request received from the Hassan Township Administrator
requesting support for a Petition for Incorporation. Hurm noted the recommendation would be to
not become involved in this matter. Mayor Bean agreed noting Hassan Township is somewhat out
of the Shorewood neighborhood. Mayor Bean suggested a letter be sent respectfully declining any
action with respect to this matter. City Administrator Hurm will address this matter.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 7
.
City Engineer Brown reported the logos are up on the water tower. The water is expected to come
on. line Novem~r 1st. Notification will need to be made to property owners on the Boulder
Bndge system to Install a pressure reducing valve prior to this system becoming activated.
C:ouncilmember McCarty inquired as to the cost of this valve. Brown explained he intends to seek
bids from several local contractors to obtain the best rate possible and provide this information to
each property owner. Councilmember Stover asked if this valve would be made available for sale
by the City and what the approximate cost would be. Finance Director Rolek noted a pressure
reducing meter would cost approximately $75. Councilmember Stover suggested the City buy
them in larger quantities and then sell them at cost for the residents.
City Engineer Brown also reported the Shady Island Bridge was reinspected prior to the start of
school. Transportation companies were asked to use a smaller bus and some schools stated they
would not go out on Enchanted Island at all. Parents were not in favor of the smaller buses. The
transportation companies encouraged larger buses be used because two axles would not be on one
span at a time. Brown noted the repairs have been determined to be holding up adequately and the
City has been assured by OSM the bridge will hold up during the winter. OSM is in agreement
that bidding could be conducted in the spring months. Brown expects a substantial cost savings of
$40,000 to $50,000 due to the inconvenience of performing this work in the winter. He would
recommend continuing with the design plan and putting bids out in January or February.
Mayor Bean noted the discussion had been to construct the bridge in the winter and inquired if
winter construction could be pursued. He asked if the wintertime would be a better time to seek
bids. Brown noted that is a possibility. He suggested the bids could be put out and if they return
favorable, the City could accept the bids and go ahead with the work. Mayor Bean noted he would
prefer the project be bid, and if a favorable bid is received, he felt the work should be completed.
He felt the City should move forward to get a permanent solution in place. The Council was in
consensus with this suggestion.
12. MA YOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember McCarty reported she had received a call from a citizen regarding depressions in
the road at Nelsine Road and 100 feet in off Smithtown Road. City Engineer Brown noted the
contractor is responsible for settlement and repairs for a one year period. Once all repairs have
been completed, a seal coat will follow.
.
13.
ADJOURNMENT
Shaw moved, McCarty seconded to adjourn to a Work Study Session at 9:30
p.m. subject to approval of claims.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Ofr Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
1. CONVENE WORK SESSION MEETING
Mayor Bean called the meeting to order at 9:42 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Stover, McCarty, Benson and Shaw; Administrator
Hurm, City Engineer Larry Brown, Intern Jason Hendrickson, Snowmobile Task
Force Co-chair Virginia Kolstad.
B.
Review Agenda
.
There were no changes to the agenda as noticed.
2. DISCUSSION ON SNOWMOBILE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Mayor Bean noted his understanding the work session would be starting with the premise the
Council is accepting the Task Force Report and the recommendations therein. Councilmember
McCarty suggested rather than voting against the entire program, she would like an opportunity to
vote in favor of areas in which she is in agreement. Mayor Bean did not feel recommendations 1
through 7 could be considered as separate issues, but perhaps the Council could arrive at what the
broad 4 to 6 recommendations are and vote on those independently.
.
Councilmember Stover pointed out this refers to snowmobiles throughout $e city and not simply
limited to the trail. She felt everyone could agree to certain parts of the report, but does not want
the discussion to come down to agreeing or disagreeing with the entire report. Councilmember
Stover noted she would like the opportunity to agree with parts of the report. She further noted
whatever action is taken, enforcement is needed. Councilmember McCarty was in agreement with
this. Task Force Co-chair Kolstad clarified the Council would need to review and consider the
recommendations to decide if they are feasible to implement and if the recommendations will solve
the problems.
Mayor Bean pointed out the Council had reached a consensus snowmobiles will stay in
Shorewood. He noted there would not be an issue with the recommendations for patrolling and
enforcement. In addition, the curfew recommendations will be accepted. With respect to speed
limits, identification and registration, those recommendations would need to be made to the State
and the DNR.
Mayor Bean noted with respect to usage, this would be a State issue and he suggested directing
Staff to make recommendations for improvement to the appropriate State agencies. He further
noted State standards and City ordinance would cover the issue of noise abatement. City
Administrator Hurm noted with respect to planting evergreens along the trail, time will not permit
this to be accomplished this year. Mayor Bean commented recommendations can be approved and
Staff can address the implementation and time frame for completion.
#~a
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 . PAGE 2
Mayor Bean Stated the side trail issue would be considered as a separate issue from the issue of
snowmobiles on the trail. Councilmembers Stover and McCarty noted their agreement.
Councilmember Stover noted this gets into the expenditure of funds and invasion into property
owners' yards. She expressed her opinion if the City is going to spend money on building trails
for hikers in the City, presumably the best location would be next to the snowmobile trail or
possibly another location could be found within the city which could be utilized. Councilmember
Stover did not want to spend a large sum of money on a side trail located next to the snowmobile
trail when there is a possibility snowmobiles could be banned in the future. City Administrator
Hurm noted the side trail would not involve a large expenditure of funds.
With respect to safety, Mayor Bean Stated he is not in favor of the 30 foot moving buffer zone.
Councilmember Stover expressed concern with trail use by the elementary school children
throughout the school year and the safety issues relative to this. Mayor Bean suggested limiting
snowmobiles on the trail during school hours to avoid this scenario. Councilmember Stover
suggested prohibiting snowmobiles on the trail beginning an hour before school and until an hour
after school for those children who use the trail coming and going from school. Mayor Bean was
not in favor of this suggestion. Councilmember Stover suggested prohibiting snowmobiles from
7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Mayor Bean noted this time period could be
published similar to other school zone requirements.
Mayor Bean felt the recommendation for a moving buffer zone would be unworkable.
Councilmember Shaw suggested requiring a reduced speed limit when a pedestrian is in view of
the snowmobile operator. Mayor Bean suggested this issue could be addressed with educational
concerns and would prefer a constant speed limit which would be easier to enforce.
Mayor Bean expressed his opinion an effective job has not been done with respect to education.
Councilmembers McCarty and Stover recalled at one point several years ago the Snow Patrol was
going to conduct more education. Mayor Bean explained City Staff would be directed to carry out
this project.
Intern Jason Hendrickson noted the DNR will conduct classes for the officer and the Snow Patrol
who will become trained and they will then be able to conduct educational classes locally. Mayor
Bean Stated he would like to see a document compiled which would identify the issues and
concerns and would be distributed to the snowmobile clubs in addition to being included in a
newsletter to all Shorewood residents. This document would begin with an outline of the City's
policy of no tolerance and clearly State that if the rules are not followed, snowmobiling will no
longer be allowed in Shorewood.
Councilmember Stover Stated she would be in favor of such a notice reflecting the snowmobile
policy and the tolerance level, noting if this policy is not followed, snowmobiles will be banned in
Shorewood. The City must then follow through with this.
Councilmember Shaw raised a concern with snowmobilers coming in from other areas who may
not be familiar with the standards which have been set in Shorewood. Councilmember Benson felt
the standards would be well communicated throughout the community. Task Force Co-chair
Kolstad commented she did not feel it would be difficult to establish a standard based on the 911
complaints which had been received and are a part of the survey results. Mayor Bean felt this
would be a 1997 goal since there is not sufficient time prior to the snowmobile season.
Mayor Bean suggested benchmarks be establish along with goals to demonstrate the
implementation and if the benchmarks are not met, snowmobiles would be banned in a one year
period of time.
.
..
.
.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 3
Mayor Bean noted the snowmobile season is defined as December 1 to March 31. Councilmember
Stover commented in the event of a major snow on November 1, snowmobilers could not use their
snowmobiles. Mayor Bean confirmed this.
Mayor Bean expressed his opinion the areas of property rights and trespass could be addressed
along with education. In addition, yielding would also be considered an educational issue.
With respect to access issues, Mayor Bean asked if the Council would be assuming the two
identified access points would be utilized. Councilmember Stover noted she would like the
Councilmembers to review the minority opinion with respect to the Timber Lane access. Mayor
Bean noted access points will be listed as an issue for consideration.
On the issue of carbide studs, Mayor Bean inquired what value the studs provide. Task Force Co-
chair Kolstad noted they provide for better steering and tracking. Councilmember Stover did not
feel anything could be done about this issue other than to consider what damage could result from
their use.
Mayor Bean outlined the topics for discussion and decision include snowmobile use of the regional
trail or not, the use of a side trail, the establishment of benchmarks, the reinforcement issue of no
tolerance and how this would be conveyed and the access issue with respect to Crescent Beach and
Timber Lane.
Mayor Bean felt the primary things the Council needs to do is accept the report and
recommendations qualified by discussion with a direction back to City Staff to develop an
implementation plan.
Councilmember Stover Stated she could not accept all of the recommendations, however, she
could accept itemized recommendations. She noted the Task Force recommendations are too
broad. Mayor Bean Stated at some point the Council needs to establish the premise that the Task
Force would be in a position to arrive at recommendations. Councilmember McCarty pointed out
they are recommendations and not mandates.
Councilmember McCarty noted the safety of the citizens is a compelling reason to separate out the
side trail issue. Councilmember Stover felt the Council needs to review the recommendations with
great favor, but retains the [mal responsibility to decide if the recommendations are a good idea or
not. Councilmember McCarty noted this is similar to the situation in which the Planning
Commission or the Park Commission makes a recommendation to City Council. The Council has
the power to deny that recommendation.
Mayor Bean pointed out the Council is generally not in a position to turn over a Commission
recommendation unless there is new information or some compelling reason to suggest the
Planning Commission was not aware of all of the pertinent information.
Mayor Bean clarified with respect to Policy Recommendations 1 through 19, the issues have been
framed and decisions need to be made subject to discussion on the four broad areas outlined which
are snowmobiles on the trail, a side trail, the establishment of benchmarks and access points of
Crescent Beach and Timber Lane. If that decision can be made, the next decisions would center
around the implementation of specific actions as identified.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - PAGE 4
Mayor Bean noted the Council will need to decide which policies to accept and which direction to
take. At that point, City Staff can be directed to address an implementation plan. Mayor Bean
Stated he has no problem stipulating that under any circumstance the Council will need to rewrite
the Ordinance. He noted no one seems to understand the language in the current ordinance and
language needs to be arrived at which is understandable so that public safety staff can be properly
directed.
Intern Jason Hendrickson produced a video tape presentation showing a fair representation of a
potential side trail. Mayor Bean inquired how far the side trail was projected to be from the
traveled trail. Task Force Co-chair Kolstad noted this had not been determined.
City Administrator Hurm pointed out the existing sumac and bushes would simply be cut to
ground level, however, there would not be any paving performed. Councilmember McCarty urged
the Councilmembers to actually walk the trail and keep in mind the various scenarios. Kolstad
pointed out trees would not be eliminated. Councilmember McCarty felt the trail is being proposed
for a place where it does not fit. Hendrickson noted Hennepin County has not approved the
addition of a side trail at this time. They will be meeting in October at which time a decision is
expected.
Councilmember Stover inquired as to the loss of trees. Hendrickson noted the largest tree which .
would possibly be affected would be 3 inches in diameter. Mayor Bean noted the Council could be
more restrictive in this case.
The Council reached consensus a framework had been established for discussion at the next City
Council meeting. Councilmember McCarty once again asked the Councilmembers to walk the trail
and put themselves in the position of the property owners and trail user and realize how bushes and
things of this nature will be unnecessarily removed.
Councilmember Stover stressed that safety is the major concern and this has not yet been
considered. She further pointed out if snowmobiles want to get to the lake they can achieve this by
using the streets. Mayor Bean questioned whether this would be safer than using the trail.
Councilmembers McCarty and Stover felt it would be better for snowmobilers to use the streets to
gain access to the lake. Mayor Bean did not agree noting the same situation exists with respect to
streets and pedestrians. Councilmember McCarty felt the problem was being compounded.
Woody Love, 5460 Teal Circle, inquired when the citizens would be allowed input into this matter.
Mayor Bean explained a public hearing was not contemplated due to the amount of information
which has been compiled by the Snowmobile Task Force which includes citizen feedback.
Councilmember McCarty Stated she would insist on a public hearing because the public is not
aware of the potential side trail. Mayor Bean noted the implementation of policy which could affect
property owners could be affected by public input, however, with respect to general policy, a
public hearing is not necessary. Councilmember Stover noted her agreement with Councilmember
McCarty with respect to a public hearing.
.
.
.
O~/19/96 THU 07:53 FAX
-+-+-+ SHOREWOOD
141 001
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
WORK SESSION
SEPTE:MBER 16, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE WO:RK S:ESSION MEETING
DRAFT
Mayor Bean called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
A
Ron Call
Present:
Mayor Bean; Counci1members Benson. McCarty, Shaw (anived at 8:08 p.m.). and
Stover; City Administrator Hunn
B.
Review Agenda
There were no changes to the agenda as noticed.
2. DISCUSSION ONlSSUES RELATED TO HOOKUP TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER
SYSTEM
Ma.yor Bean explained the procedure to be followed for the Work Study Sessioll as well as the issue
to be discussed. He explained the current ordinance concerning mandatory water hookups relates
only to multi-fiuniJy and commercial. Mayor Bean summarized Ordinance 903.15 which provides any
properties involving two or more dwelling units situated 011 the street or right-of-way where there
is located a municipal water pump or lateral facility will be required, at the expense of the owner, to
be connected to the water within 90 days of written notice of the Council of intent to co1U1ect. Mayor
Bean explained the discussion would center around whether the ordinance should be amended in any
way to either add the 18 month hookup requirement or leave the ordinance as it now stands.
Mayor Bean noted from his standpoint he did not feel it would be necessary to require homeowners
to hook up to the system. He further noted the issues to be discussed include comer lots, mandatory
hookup requirements as well as the issue of tbe ~stin.g wells and possible requirements the wells be
capped or abandoned-
WELLS
Councilmember Benson expressed his opinion as long as the two systems are not co-mingled7 the
home owner should be able to continue utilizing their private wells rather than require they be
abandoned. He noted in a drought situation, it would be beneficial for everyone if homeowners used
their wells for purposes such as lawn watering.
CounCl1memher Stover felt the homeowner should have the choice to keep their own well. however,
if a well is abandoned, she pointed out state law requires the well be capped.
1P ~c,
09/19/96 THU 07:54 FAX
-+-+-+ SHOREWOOD
l4i002
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 - PAGE 2
Mayor Bean noted the present ordinance allows for use of the well as long as the water is not co-
mingled with the municipal water system. He questioned if the homeowner should be allowed to
make repairs to their private well He pointed out the current ordinance provides private wells may
be maintained and COIItinued in use after cormection to the water system as long as there is no means
of cross connection.
Mayor Bean asked if a home owner would be allowed to construct a new well and suggested the
ordinance provide that a homeowner may construct, maintain and continue to use a well after the
connection provided there is no means of cross connection. Counci1member Stover stated she would
like the City Attorney's input.
The Council reached consensus to direct staff to prepare an amendment to the ordinance with input
from the City Attorney reflecting the Council's intent to modify the ordinance to reflect private wells .
may be constructed and maintained.
MANDATORY HOOKUP
Councilmember McCarty expressed her opinion she would like hookup to be at the choice of the
homeowner. Councilme.mbers Stover and Benson noted their agreement. Mayor Bean pointed out
the ordinance does include a mandatory hookup for commercial and multi-family facilities.
Councilmember Stover inquired if developers would be required to hook up. Mayor Bean noted the
concern with commercial property relates to the use of water by the public utilizing that property who
may come into contact with unsafe water.
Councilmember Stover noted an advantage for commercial properties being required to hook up is
related to the safety issue of being able to sprinkle the property in the case of a fire.
Mayor Bean stated he would be in agreement with requiring commercial properties to hook up at the
point in time water is available. CounciImember McCarty inquired if this would include duplex and .
single family rental properties. Councilmember Stover noted there are also single family rental
properties in the city. She commented at the present time there is not a facility larger than a duplex
which is not on municipal water.
Mayor Bean expressed concern relative to rental properties when there is not a local owner and
regular testing of the water quality. Councilmember Benson noted the current ordinance with respect
to multi-fiunily residential and commercial property has been in place for many years and did not feel
it should be changed at this time. Councilmember McCarty noted her agreement.
Mayor Bean suggested redefir1ing multi-family residential to distinguish between rental property and
owner occupied property. He also felt rental properties would still need to be hooked up.
Councilmember Stover was opposed to this comment1ng some owners temporarily rent out their
homes and then move back.. Councilmember Shaw suggested registered multiple rental properties
'" '0"'9/19/96 THU 07: 54 FAX
.
.
-+-+-+ SHOREWOOD
~003
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 16, 1996-PAGE3
be required to hook up. Councilmembers Benson and McCarty noted their agreement.
CounciJmember Stover expressed concern where an owner lives in one half of the property and rents
out the other half.
Mayor Bean noted concern with respect to rental properties. Councilmember Stover was in
agreement with commercial properties being subject to the mandatory hookup. Administrator Hwm
suggested staff could research this issue to determine the number of multiple family homes on
municipal water.
:Mayor Bean suggested directing staff to look into current multiple family circumstances versus those
which are registered, and further directing staff by simple resolution to clarifY the interpretation
relative to Ordinance 903.15 that it does not include mandatory hookup of single tamily residential
properties by virtue ofmumcipal water.
CORNER LOTS
The Council was in agreement this matter became a moot issue due to the consensus that hookup will
not be mandatory. Assessments will go through as water is made available. With respect to comer
lots, City Administrator Hunn noted there is a preference for the connection to be in the front of the
house, however if a property owner had a reasonable purpose for utilizing another connection,
consideration would be given to that request.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to adjoumed the Work Session Meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBl\UTl')!;D.
Cheryl Wallat, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ArrEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
. ~'" ..
.
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD- SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 - (612) 474-3236
Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
Grewe - Request of Extension of C.U.P.
19 September 1996
405 (95.32)
Due to his wife's illness, Jerry Grewe has requested a one year extension of his conditional
use permit (see attached letter, dated 30 August 1996). His c.u.p. and a variance were
granted in October 1995, and allow him to build accessory space in excess of 1200 square
feet and have two houses on one lot while the new home is being built. Approval is
recommended.
.
Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
Jerry Grewe
cc:
A Residential Community on Lake Minneronka's South Shore
?,A,
..",. .....
.
.
-....--. .-.:--...-..:.-
.'1 :'_
GERALD W. GREWE
4550 ENCHANTED POINT
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
... ," "-
~'
:.; It.;Cr.
t, .....,1.JO
,-,
-'
" ;'.l
" ..:. ---------~. ~ -
-
-_. ....--....--
August 30, 1996
Bradley J. Nielson
Planning Director
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331-8927
Dear Mr. Nielson:
Per your letter of November 15, 1995, I find it necessary to
formally request a one-year extension. My wife has had a rough
year as a cancer patient. She is now well on her way to recovery,
and we want to go forward with our plans. Thank you for your
cooperation.
Sincerely,
Jerry Grewe
~f~d/~
JG:sf/
~~ ~
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code Section 507.05 provides for the
annual licensing of refuse collectors in the City; and
WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant shall complete an
application and fulfIll certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing
fee; and
WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily completed this
application and fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a License for Refuse
Collection.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Shorewood as follows:
That a License for Refuse Collection be issued for a term of one year or any portion
thereof, from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996, to the following applicant:
Permit #
Firm Name
Address
5653 Hampshire Ave N
Crystal, MN 55428
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 23rd day of
September, 1996.
96-031
WTI Waste Technology Inc.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
#88
License Year:
,,-
c,lt; -03)
f\C{ (p
Application Fee:
.- ;)...~
$ (J . ()~ ,:, ;,:::~-~ .:.----:~:;.=':
:~"\ i i~",~,,(_...-~, ! c_ : ~~ ! !~\\
:...)/ ii .
II i
) 'C 1Q06 ! i f
'~,- ,L ,_, i~v Jl..,li
~I
.-"-\
CITY OF SHOREWOOD . ,I
APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LICENSE
(pursuant to City Code Section 507)
Date:
Sv
Company Name: \JJ", "or:. W~S~~ \i:.( L.......I<;;; \C:jj :::c,...;(_
Business Contact: ._~ {\~ \~"'-'\ t"('~
Business
Address : ..s~s:s
Phone: b I'}
~~~.LL.~-.!.UQ_L~\jcl
(street) (city)
SS'-i"d-K
(zip)
S37- sS-S ~
(business)
.
Description of Vehicles/Equipment:
License #
,It ?~(/r
Make/Model Weiaht Unloaded
P? Vt'J/v-p ~.(k S/4C ~/lc0(--- ~-/SPZJ
.
Charqes for Collection Service:
Type of Service
Type of Service
Type of Service
Type of Service
Type of Service
Type of Service
~~ .p-u~~
~ ;;~/?
Charge $ ,/.7 prz;
Charge $ /~iI1""7
Charge $ /' "'" P2J
Charge $
Charge $
Charge $
-~
.
.
Location of Disposal:
Location Manner
A/~ fh;/J~.N tfiG'tcJl~f
rl/ 5" /PcaIC;:~ f
of Disoosal
A ~d F. 'r /
.LM(?r:'11
Insurance:
Applicant must provide to the City proof of public liablity
insurance coverage for all vehicles to be used by applicant in the
licensed business within the City limits of Shorewood.
$~m
each person injured Yes (
Expiration Date: ~ - / J -'17
No
$ S-~ ()t)7J
maximum ~. verage for each accident
Yes V\) No ( )
against loss or damage to property
Yes ( No ( )
Expiration Date: ~-/.3- 17
License Application Fee:
Application Fee $50.00 plus License Fee $25.00 per truck operating
within the City limits
hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in
the
are
Company
Owner's
Signature.
Representative's
Signature:
(title)
.
.
..
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Borkon called the meeting to order at 7:01p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Borkon; Commissioners Foust (arrived at 7:19 p.m.), Kolstad, Lizee,
Pisula, Rosenberger, Turgeon; Council Liaison Benson and Planning
Director Nielsen.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Turgeon moved, Pisula seconded to approve the August 6, 1996 Planning
Commission meeting minutes as submitted. Motion passed 5/0. (Chair Borkon
abstained.)
1. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL INTERPRETATION OF CITY CODE
REGARDING NONCONFORMING DOCKS
Applicant:
James Cabalka
Location:
58XX Christmas Lake Road
Chair Borkon announced the case and explained the procedure which would be followed with
respect to the public hearing. Chair Borkon requested an analysis of the case from Planning
Director Nielsen who reviewed the matter in detail.
Jim and Betty Cabalka appeared with their family to address the Commission. Mr. Cabalka
provided each Commissioner with a typewritten copy of his presentation. He explained he has
never received any complaints regarding the dock or docking privileges. The Cabalkas have
received letters and telephone calls in support of continued dockage. Mr. Cabalka provided a
packet of information, including copies of letters of support on his behalf. He noted others in
support of the dock have contacted the Mayor and other officials to express their approval,
however, they were unwilling to write letters out of concern for the relationship this would create
with the complainant.
Mr. Cabalka stated a dock of varying shapes and sizes has been in existence on the property
predating 1981 and 1965. Mr. Cabalka questioned why, after 42 years of dock existence, there is
a demand for him to respond immediately with removal of the dock.
Mr. Cabalka stated this issue should be reviewed if the City codes are to be applied equally to
everyone. He noted there are two situations on the lake in which docks were built in the 1950s.
There are no residence on the property, however the docks are there. Mr. Cabalka feels there
exists a tolerance around the lake with respect to issues of this nature.
Mr. Cabalka commented when the extended dock was installed, it was placed as a handicapped
ramp for a family member. He stated there would be a need for this now and in the future. Mr.
- <
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 - PAGE 2
A
Cabalka noted there is a requirement in which the least restrictive environment and program must
be provided.
Chair Borkon opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m.
Kevin Kuester, addressed the Commission explaining he is the property owner next to the Cabalka
property. He stated there was a dock on the Cabalkas' property when he moved in in
approximately 1991. Mr. Kuester explained the dock at that time was very sheltered, however, in
the past two to three years, the dock was removed completely and a new, significantly larger dock
installed. The old pieces were assembled next to the new dock forming a canoe ramp.
Mr. Kuester pointed out he had recently visited the property and noted there were three docks and
four boats on the property in addition to an underground storage tank, a lawn mower, as well as a
host of building materials. He further noticed a fence which had been reinforced in the past year.
Mr. Kuester expressed concern the area will begin to resemble a marina. In addition, he has
noticed children from the nearby apartment complex playing unsupervised on the pontoon boat and
expressed a safety concern relative to this.
Hearing no further testimony, Chair Borkon closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
.
Commissioner Kolstad inquired with respect to the requirements for replacement of a
nonconforming dock. Planning Director Nielsen explained any nonconforming structure can be
repaired up to 50 percent of its value, however, at any point a dock is destroyed or removed to 50
percent of its value, the grandfathered rights are lost.
Chair Borkon asked about docks which are removed in the winter and put back in place in the
spring. Nielsen stated this is difficult to determine, however, the City attempts to be flexible in
terms of docks being seasonal. He further pointed out the City has been flexible with respect to the
lengthening of docks.
Chair Borkon suggested on alternative would be to allow the older dock to remain with its present
use, but that the new dock be required to be removed.
Commissioner Kolstad asked if the old dock was safe to continue to use. Mr. Cabalka commented
most of the lumber has been discarded because most of the dock had been underwater. He .
explained the useable fragments of the dock had been utilized and that the new dock covers up the
original dock from 1950.
Chair Borkon inquired as to boat storage during the wintertime. Mr. Cabalka stated there would be
no storage of boats over the winter.
.
Chair Borkon asked Planning Director Nielsen to address the issue as to the use of the property if
there is no proof to show there was a dock which had been grandfathered in. Nielsen stated the
property could still be used, however, it could not be used for swimming or fishing. One
possibility would be to sell the property to an adjoining property owner. Nielsen explained it is a
remanent piece of property which is unbuildable.
Commissioner Turgeon did not feel the burden of proof which is placed upon the applicant had
been met. She expressed her concern for the number of docks on the property, the number of
watercraft present at the docks and the number of people utilizing the property. Commissioner
Turgeon commented that giving approval to this request would be allowing the Cabalkas a use
other property owners would not be permitted to have.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 - PAGE 3
Chair Borkon noted this is a small piece of property which has remained in the family. If the
grandfathered dock is not allowed, the property would not remain in the family since it has no use
other than to be sold off. Chair Borkon stated she viould like to reach a concl1:lsiofl 'limen would
be in conf-onnance '.vith the ordinance, but aJlow the Cabalkas to utilize the dock had the dock been
in conformance with the ordinance and remained in continous useage, this would allow the
Cabalkas to utilize the dock..
.
Mr. Cabalka explained he utilizes the public access for the watercraft. He stated he would be
willing to remove the older material which is longer and extends further into the lake due to a low
water level. A newer, much shorter dock was put in its place.
Chair Borkon noted if the Commission were to reach a consensus the dock had been
grandfathered, 50 percent of the old dock and 50 percent of the new dock would need to be
maintained for one year and the remaining 50 percent of the old dock replaced the following year.
Commissioner Kolstad expressed her belief some proof should be obtainable to verify the
existence of the dock in 1965 which would allow it to be grandfathered in. Commissioners
Turgeon and Pisula noted their agreement.
Commissioner Foust suggested tabling the matter for two weeks to allow Mr. Cabalka to obtain
some proof the docks had been present on the lake. Mr. Cabalka noted the people who would
have knowledge of the existence of the dock are deceased.
Commissioner Turgeon suggested aerial photos, the original survey work and any available
witnesses should be submitted to the Commission. It would be acceptable to have letters from two
neighbors verifying a dock has been in place and continuously maintained since 1965.
Commissioner Kolstad felt it would be sufficient to have two people come forward who could
attest to the existence of the dock since 1965.
Commissioner Rosenberger noted reasonable use of the property would need to be discussed in the
future.
.
Foust moved, Pisula seconded to table consideration of the Appeal Interpretation
of City Code Regarding Nonconforming Docks for James Cabalka, 58XX
Christmas Lake Road, to the October 1, 1996, Planning Commission Meeting.
Motion passed 7/0.
Chair Borkon informed Mr. Cabalka he will need to submit the requested information one week
prior the scheduled meeting on October 1, 1996.
2. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL INTERPRETATION OF CITY CODE
REGARDING SETBACKS IN AMESBURY P.U.D.
Applicant:
McNulty Construction Co.
4613 Bayswater Road
Location:
Chair Borkon announced the case and reviewed the procedure for the public hearing. She
requested a review of the matter from Planning Director Nielsen who reviewed the case in detail.
Jim McNulty appeared and addressed the Commission. Mr. McNulty explained the subject unit is
currently under construction to be displayed in the Parade of Homes. He expressed his belief the
presence of a deck is necessary for a successful sale of the home. Mr. McNulty noted the deck
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 - PAGE 4
would extend two feet into the common area. He also expressed his disagreement with Planning
Director Nielsen and stated over the past 20 years, the City has routinely approved extensions into
the common area not only for the building of units, but for additions to them at a later time.
Mr. McNulty went on to review and explain the photos which were included in the Planning
Commission packet. He stated the letter from Planning Director Nielsen of 1990 was in
contradiction to City policy and practice at that time. Mr. McNulty also expressed his belief that
this code is contrary to the law and is being applied unfairly.
Chair Borkon opened the public hearing at 8:31 p.m. Hearing no public testimony, Chair Borkon
closed the public hearing at 8:31 p.m.
Commissioner Turgeon inquired how many of the photographs depicted units which had been built
since 1990. Mr. McNulty stated he was not sure, but possibly one or two had been built since that
time. Commissioner Turgeon noted this matter came up with Mr. Grable a year ago and there had
been almost a year to work out this disagreement. Mr. McNulty responded he had appeared before
the Commission to simply exhaust his remedies and requested the Commission vote on the
request.
.
Rosenberger moved, Turgeon seconded to deny the appeal interpretation of City
Code Regarding Setbacks in Amesbury P.D.D. for McNulty Construction Co.,
4613 Bayswater Road.
Commissioner Kolstad recalled staff had been directed to attempt a resolution of this issue when it
arose in the past and inquired if any action had been taken on that request. Planning Director
Nielsen stated prior to a Council decision being reached, Mr. Grable had withdrawn his request.
Commissioners Rosenberger and Foust noted a substantial amount of time had been spent on this
issue in the past, however, Commissioner Rosenberger felt the time would be better served in
working with the Amesbury Association. He suggested they submit a request to the Planning
Commission and attempt to work with the P.D.D. agreement.
Motion passed 7/0.
Kolstad moved, Rosenberger seconded directing City Staff to explore alternatives .
available and clarify the setback provisions in the Amesbury P.D.D. by the
September 17, 1996, Planning Commission Study Session. Motion passed 7/0.
3. SIMPLE SDBDIVISION/COMBINA TION
Applicant:
Mark Sass
Location:
Lots 10, 11, 12, Block 11, Minnetonka Manor
Chair Borkon announced the case. Commissioner Rosenberger recused himself from
consideration of this issue due to a working relationship which currently exists between himself
and Mr. Sass.
Chair Borkon recessed the meeting at 8:48 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:54 p.m.
Chair Borkon requested a review of the matter from Planning Director Nielsen who reviewed the
case in detail. Mark Sass appeared and stated he will attempt to meet the time requirements
included in the recommendations of City Staff.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 - PAGE 5
Commissioner Foust asked if Mr. Sass would receive a rebate of sewer access and trunk water
charges since the property was assessed as four lots. Nielsen explained the lots probably were not
assessed since the local sanitary sewer access fees were implemented in the early 1970s and the
water trunk charges within the last year or two.
Commissioner Turgeon inquired if Mr. Sass would be more comfortable with the dates moved into
October. Mr. Sass expressed some concern with meeting the time requirements, however, he
stated he would prefer to complete this work as quickly as possible.
Turgeon moved, Lizee seconded approval of a simple subdivision/combination for
Mark Sass, Lots 10, 11, 12, Block 11, Minnetonka Manor, subject to staff
recommendations. Motion passed 6/0. (Commissioner Rosenberger recused
himself from consideration of this matter.)
4.
REZONING FROM R-IA TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.D.D.)
FOR WATTEN PONDS (Continued from Planning Commission Meeting
7/2/96)
.
Applicant:
Dahlstrom Abingdon L.L.P.
5340 and 5370 Eureka Road
Location:
Chair Borkon announced the case and requested a review of the matter from Planning Director
Nielsen who reviewed the case in detail.
..
Charles Dillerud appeared and addressed the Commission. He reviewed and explained the
alternative location which was selected approved by the Watershed District for the NURP pond.
Mr. Dillerud explained his interpretation of the 4/2 vote of the Watershed District with respect to
their approval of the plan and the variance.
Mr. Dillerud noted he has reviewed the recommendations of City Engineer Larry Brown and felt
they could be accomplished. He further expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission
for their patience in this matter.
Nielsen noted a rezoning from R-1A to a Planned Unit Development would require a second public
hearing at the City Council level.
Jerry O'Neill, 25540 Nelsine Drive, noted his disagreement with Mr. Dillerud's comments with
respect to the recommendations of the Watershed District.
Chair Borkon recessed the meeting at 9:27 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:51 p.m.
Commissioner Turgeon inquired why the Watershed District did not consider the alternatives the
Planning Commission had suggested with respect to this issue.
Mr. O'Neill clarified the size of the buffer and noted the reason for the two dissenting votes was
due to the fact those two particular members suggested moving the pond onto a buildable site thus
eliminating one of the sites. Mr. O'Neill stated he would like the Commission to review the
minutes of that particular meeting of the Watershed District to clarify the reasoning for the two
dissenting votes.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 - PAGE 6
Commissioner Kolstad questioned the 8 percent driveway grade on the one of the lots. Nielsen
noted 10 percent would be a maximum grade, however 8 percent is preferable with streets limited
to 8 percent in most cases.
Commissioner Turgeon stated she would prefer the pond not be located as close to the house pad
as is reflected and would prefer a Type 1 pond to a Type 3. She further stated she would like to
review the discussion which took place leading to the final decision which allowed the pond to
remain in this particular location. Commissioner Lizee noted her agreement.
Greg Larson, 25535 Orchard Circle, explained the Watershed District did not determine this to be
the best place. The Watershed District noted they do not make opinions, but strictly review the site
as presented by the developer and it was determined this pond met the NURP requirements of the
Watershed District. The Watershed District then left the matter up to the City to determine whether
any remaining criteria had been met.
Commission Turgeon noted the Planning Commission's primary focus had been to request a Type
1 designation to a Type 3 designation.
Mr. Dillerud commented the Watershed District had not determined what the standards were going
to be which would permit the developer to dredge the pond. Three months prior to that time, there
had not been any standards in existence. Mr. Dillerud went on to explain his interpretation of the
decision process of the Watershed District.
Mr. Dillerud also noted there were three locations left as possibilities for the NURP pond. There
was a more favorable site for the pond, however, this would have resulted in a substantial loss of
trees, which will not be the result in the current location.
Commissioner Turgeon asked the Watershed District be approached and the rationale for their
decision be requested. She would like to have them consider the alternatives which were proposed
by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Dillerud clarified the suggestions of the Planning Commission had been discussed in telephone
conversations with the Watershed District and he explained the sequence of events relative to this
discussion.
Commissioner Kolstad expressed her belief more information would need to be brought forward
before the Planning Commission could make a decision on this issue.
Mr. Dillerud noted the Board staff recommendations went through some of the same alternatives
discussed by the Planning Commission.
Nielsen pointed out that City Engineer Brown has considered all of the alternatives and noted his
preference for the wetland area which was approved by the Watershed District. Commissioner
Turgeon stated she would like to review the rules which would make it feasible for the Planning
Commission's preferred wetland area to be utilized.
Turgeon moved, Pisula seconded to table the development stage plans for Watten
Ponds P.U.D.until September 17, 1996, subject to staff receipt of the rationale
from the Watershed District with respect to the decision determining the location
of the NURP pond and the discussion relative to the Planning Commission's
preferred wetland area. Motion passed 7/0.
.
.
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 . PAGE 7
Commissioner Rosenberger expressed his opinion a resolution needs to be reached with the
Watershed District, and possibly a meeting with the Board Chair and a staff member would be
helpful. Nielsen will attempt to arrange this. Chair Borkon suggested utilizing a study session for
this purpose. In addition, Chair Borkon requested information on how members are appointed to
the Watershed District and the length of time a member serves.
Commissioner Kolstad stated she would like to know why the Planning Commission's suggestion
was not submitted to the Watershed District and would like to have accurate and objective
information relative to the actions which were taken by the Watershed District.
5. MA TTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None.
6. REPORTS
Chair Borkon inquired with respect to Highway 7 and Christmas Lake Road noting another
accident has occurred and she suggested additional signage would be appropriate noting an exit
would be necessary to accomplish a left turn and acknowledging the upcoming semaphore.
Planning Director Nielsen stated he will investigate this issue with MNDOT.
Chair Borkon also inquired why the diameter of the water line into the Minnetonka Country Club is
at 8 inches. Nielsen explained a 6-inch diameter is necessary to allow for a building sprinkler
system and 2 inches for portable water. Nielsen noted a 6-inch water line would have sufficed, but
it was determined an 8-inch line would be preferable.
Commissioner Lizee questioned when Smithtown Road would be reopened and Nielsen noted the
paving is scheduled for Thursday of this week. She further inquired with respect to the Smithtown
Trail. Nielsen explained the Park Commission will need to review this matter after the right-of-
way issue has been determined.
Council Liaison Benson reviewed the matters considered and actions taken at the August 26, 1996,
meeting of the City Council in addition to the discussions held during the work session which
followed the regular Council meeting.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Lizee moved, Turgeon seconded to adjourn the meeting at 11:12 p.m. Motion
passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Cheryl Wallat
Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
NOTE: Corrections to minutes by the Planning Commission are shown as italics for additions and
strikeouts for deletions.
-
CITY OF.
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
3 September 1996
Sass, Mark - Simple Subdivision
405 (96.20)
BACKGROUND
Mark Sass proposes to combine four substandard lots located on the east side of
Minnetonka Boulevard, immediately north of Forest Drive (see Site Location map - Exhibit
A, attached), and resubdivide them into two conforming lots (see Exhibit B). The property
is zoned R-ID, Single-Family Residential and contains approximately 23,367 square feet
of area.
.
The applicant proposes two lots, the northernmost one (Parcel A) containing 10,488 square
feet and the southern lot (Parcel B) containing 12,879 square feet.
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
The R-ID district requires lots to be at least 75 wide at the building line, 120 feet deep, and
10,000 square feet in area. The proposed lots meet or exceed these requirements. Parcel A
is 75 feet wide, 138 feet deep, and contains 10,488 square feet of area. Parcel B is 107
feet wide, 141 feet deep and contains 12,879 square feet. Building setbacks, shown on
Exhibit B, allow adequate buildable area for two homes.
The applicant has proposed a driveway easement across Parcel B for access to Parcel A.
This will eliminate the need for direct access to Minnetonka Boulevard, which is designated
as a collector street in the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant's survey shows the location of significant trees on the site. Although some
will be removed to accommodate houses, the subdivision itself involves no tree removal.
Consequently, tree replacement will be addressed upon application for building permits.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
s-
-
1.
2.
'. 3.
4.
5.
Memo re: Sass Simple Subdivision
3 September 1996
The combination and division eliminates four nonconforming lots of record, replacing them
with two lots which conform to Shorewood zoning standards. Since no new lots are
technically being created, park dedication fees, sewer access charges and trunk water
charges are not required. Water is not proposed to be extended until 2001, at which time
the lots will be assessed along with other properties in the vicinity.
It is recommended that the combination and resubdivision be approved, subject to the
following conditions:
The applicant must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion for review
by the City Attorney. .
The applicant's surveyor must provide legal descriptions for drainage and utility
easements, 10 feet on each side of each rear and side lot line.
The applicant's attorney must prepare deeds conveying the easements referenced in
2. above to the City of Shorewood.
The items listed above must be submitted by 16 September in order to be scheduled
for Council review on 23 September.
The applicant must record the resolution approving the division with Hennepin
County within 30 days of the date the Council approves it.
cc: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
Larry Brown
Mark Sass
.
-2-
...-.....-..
9i
.., .: \
Tf,"l \
~,'!! \
- ~~
'-;,
~~:\
~-,
~
~\
", ~~... \
. , ,.... ~\;.;.....
~
-.... ~
~
~
~
~
7~3
.
l-M~ ,
(75) I'~ Z~
i
Exhibit A A TION
SITE ~O~e subdivision
Sass -sImp
Iii
...J
w.
I-.
o
~
i<J
.:::
Q"
~
o
I
IV
17
: -_:
. . --: I I
985 a
S 8904"!'5'3"E
-r 1"38. 1.---
~ . '1 ". "1 J I
,O~
"ROCK ~O~~E~ ~~L.Ll
~86_ 5
()'--
-.."
I I \\.
,\ )
,"-
ll'~~~
" \ /'
\ \' I-
~'~~ ''''- "-'"
11 :=~ 5.-',
'~
o
...
~ET8ACI< UNE. (TYP.)
, ,
, I
, .
AN,
"30 . ':-'
,
. '-
, .
I
I
~ I
0
GO 0 9l!.4'll.6
GO iii
G" ,..
"35
J.....
'(~
9 7..1
CI)
~9~7;
~ I
<:)"1 I
.... I
h 0
~ ~
-.....J lJ:: ,..
~
C:/
,,--.
~-)
t.I lI'I
r4f' I;'J 9&5,.4
GO 0
CI\ ...
',_....
,
,
I
I
~651CO
!II
W
It' 30
~
0 ~
... ~
W en
(1l :r Q1
GO a: CSI
... uJ
;>
0 0
, ...
Gi
-
~4..e.
~
~8!\..;
a:.
,--
"'-',
-'
I
~
o
.lI.
Exhibit B
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
"' ~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
DRAFT INVESTMENT POLICY
.
SCOPE: This investment policy applies to activities of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota
with regard to investing the financial assets of all funds, including the following:
. General Fund
. Special Revenue Funds
. Debt Service Funds
. Capital Project Funds
. Enterprise Funds
. Internal Service Funds
. Trust and Agency Funds
OBJECTIVES: Investments of the City of Shorewood shall be in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes 475.66 and this policy shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to
ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective,
diversification is required in order that losses on individual securities do not exceed the
income within the entire portfolio.
The City will seek to place all of its deposits and investments with Minnesota depositories
and/or broker/dealers.
A market average rate of return will be sought throughout budgetary and economic cycles.
The investment strategy will take into account the constraints on risk and cash flow
characteristics of the investment portfolio.
.
All officials and employees that are part of the investment process shall seek to act
responsibly as custodians of the public trust. The investment portfolio shall be designed
and managed with a high degree of professionalism worthy of the public trust. The City,
however, recognizes that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are
inevitable and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment
return, provided adequate diversification has been implemented.
POOLING OF INVESTMENTS: For purposes of making the maximum amount of
funds available for investment, cash assets for all City funds is pooled in an investment
account. Interest earnings are allocated among the various funds based upon their monthly
cash balance.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY: In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 471.56,
the responsibility for conducting investment transactions resides with the Finance
Director/Treasurer and, in the absence of the Finance Director/Treasurer, the City
Administrator (hereafter called "investment officers"). The investment officers are
authorized to make investments of public funds. No person may engage in an investment
transaction except as provided in this policy.
it&
.tJ'
PRUDENCE: Investments shall be made with judgment and care. The standard of
prudence, as defined by Minnesota Statutes 356A.04, meaning not for speculation and with
consideration of the probable safety of the capital as well as the probable investment return,
derived from assets, will be applied in all investment transactions.
The investment officers, acting in accordance with this written policy and exercising due
diligence, shall not be held personally responsible for a specific security's credit risk or
market price changes, provided that these deviations are reported immediately and that
appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
INTERNAL CONTROLS: Internal controls are designed to prevent loss of public
funds due to fraud, error, misrepresentation, unanticipated market changes or imprudent
actions. Before the City of Shorewood invests any surplus funds, an analysis of possible
investments shall be conducted. If a specific maturity date is required, either for cash flow
purposes or for conformance to maturity guidelines, quotations will be requested for
instruments which meet the maturity requirement. If no specific maturity is required, an
analysis of various options will be conducted to determine which maturities would be most
advantageous.
Quotations will be requested from financial institutions for various options with regards to
term and instrument. The City of Shorewood will accept the option which provides the
highest rate of return within the maturity required and within the limits of these policies.
The investment officer shall generate monthly reports which will include data on investment
instruments being held by the City.
Investment records of the City shall be reviewed by independent auditors as part of the
City's annual audit for compliance with state statutes and this policy.
.
ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Officers and employees involved in
the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with
the investment program, or which could reasonably cause others to question or doubt their
ability to make impartial investment decisions.
PARTICULAR PROVISIONS OR RESTRICTIONS: In selecting depositories,
the credit worthiness of the institution shall be considered and the investment officers shall
conduct a comprehensive review of prospective depository credit, characteristics, services
available, and financial history. Selection will be in accordance with Minnesota Statutes
118.005 and 118.01
.
Before engaging in investment transactions with the City of Shorewood, the supervising
officer at the securities broker/dealer shall submit a certification. The document will state
that the officer has reviewed the investment policies and objectives, as well as applicable
state law, and agrees to disclose potential conflicts of interest or risk to public funds that
might arise out of business transactions between the firm and the City of Shorewood. All
financial institutions shall agree to undertake reasonable efforts to preclude imprudent
transactions involving the City of Shorewood' s funds.
INSTRUMENTS: The City of Shorewood will only invest in instruments which are in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes 475.66. Investment is allowable in any mortgage
derivative product which is not "high risk" per Minnesota Statutes 475.66. Documentation
of such compliance with at least the results of three separate independent statutory "impact"
tests all of which indicate that the security is not "high risk" is required. Test results will be
kept on file for audit purposes.
-
.
.
At the time of purchase of any mortgage or mortgage related security, the investment officer
will obtain documentation of compliance with this policy.
CUSTODIAL RISK: The investment officer shall structure all investments, deposits,
and repurchase agreements so that the custodial risk is at all times in category # 1 or # 2
under GASB Statement # 3. All investments are placed in safekeeping at financial
institutions.
DIVERSIFICA TION/MA TURITIES: It is the policy of the City of Shorewood to
diversify its investment portfolio to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over-
concentration of assets in a specific maturity, a specific issuer or a specific class of
securities. The maturities selected shall provide for stability of income and reasonable
liquidity.
~ -..
I
I
I
I
.
i
I
I
!
.
~ . d
,
CHAPTER 802
SNOWMOBILES
SECTION:
802.01 :
802,,02:
802.03:
802.04:
802.05:
802.06
802.07
802.08
802.09
802.10
Defmitions
Operation on Streets and Highways
Operation Generally .
Equipment
Application of Other Laws
Persons Under Certain Age
Leaving Snowmobile Unatt$1ded
Chasing Animals Forbidden
Littering and Obs1ructions
Violations
802.01: DEFINITIONS
,
Subd. 1. BOULEVARD: That portion of the street right-of-way betwe th~ curb . 4' and the
street boundary line in platted areas.
Subd, 2.
Bikini Trait).
coq,nrate hounda1:Y_
SuM. 4,
OPERATE: To ride in or on and control the operation of a snoWmobile. ;
OPERATOR: Every _ who operates or is in ac~ PhYsif control ota
snowmobile.
. j ,
OROANIZED EVENT: An event sponsored and conducted bJ the Park an~
Recreation Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, Jaycees, -~erican Legion or
similar Council-recognized civic groups or associations.; I
OWNER: A person, other than a lienholder, having the prope~ in or title to a
snowmobile and entitled to the use or pos5<'ssion thereof. '
Subd. ~;.
Subd. 64,
Subd.l~.
v~19t 966t'6t'69
$t713
NI:tW.::l.::lOH Nt:
...
III ~
;
!
t
i
1
j
j i
Subd. Jl6. PERSON: Includes an individual, jl8rtDershjp, COlpOrati9D,jan1lany ~,of peroons,
whether incorporated or not, the State of Minnesota and its ,genpies andlliolitical
subdivisions, except this definition doe~ not include police <tfficers or d . y authorized
and uninformed snow patrol personnel in the performance ophejr duties
1
Subd.9.+. RIGHT-OF-WAY: The entire strip ofland transversed by a!U&bway in bicb the
public owns the fee or an easement for roadway purposes. i .
Subd.lll8. ROADWAY: That portion ofa _ or highway improVed,!designed, "i ordinariIy
used for vehicular travel, fs.excluding the shoulder. 1
I
j
Subd.1l9. SAFETY or DEADMAN THROTTLE: A device which, w1n Ptessure s .removed
from the engine accelerator or throttle, causes the motor to b dis~ngaged trom the
driving track. . .
Subd. 12Q. SNOWMOBILE: A self-propelled vehicle designed for trav I on;snow OJ i~ or
natural terrain steered by skis or runners.. ..
Subd. 1.3,-1-. STREET or mGHWA Y: The entire width between boun Iin~ of an way or
place when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, a ~atter Ofr' ght, for
the purpose of vehicular traffic.
Subd. I~. HlKINO AND BIKINO TRAIL: The old railroad corridor, a' uIliuse ~ corridor,
a1sq q,O"lll1'l the LR! Trai~ which runs r:m-sW through Sh !JOd ~ IOfher .
western suburbs, and IS owned by Hennepm County. .
'. '. . . .
802.02:
Subd. 1.
OPERATION ON STREETS AND WGHW AYS:
No person shall operate a snowmobile upon the roadway, sho der or insid bank or
slope of any trunk, County-State aid, City or County highway th~ City d, in the
case of divided trunk or County highway, on the right-of-way tw~n the Jjposing
lanes of traffic, except as provided in this Chapter, nor shaJJ 0 tion on Yi such
highway be permitted, where the roadway directly abuts a publ c sic;fewaJk r property
used for private purposes. No person shall operate a snowmob e Within th right-of-
way of any trunk, County-State aid, City or County highway, a tim~ other tI)an
those times authorized in this Chapter, except on the right-luUld sid~ of sue right-of-
way and in the same direction as the highway traffic on the ~e t lane of e
roadway adjacent thereto. No snowmobile shall be operated .at y ~me wi ~ the
right-of-way of any interstate highway or freeway within the ,Ci . (Ord. 29 ,; 1-23-
95) ... I
I
.
I .
2.
l> . d
S~:9t 966t"6t"68
i
HtlW~~OH HI~~tll wo~~
,
I
I
~
..
I
!
,
:; -d
,
Subd. .l~.
Subd. ~.
Subd. ~4.
Subd. ~.
I
I
i
I I
No person shall operate a snowmobile upon the roadway~. f y ~treet or pighway
except for the purpose of direct travel from the person's ho e to the clo;!t
snowmobile area by the shortest possible route and then onI if ~vel on ;~e adjacent
street or highway right-of-way is restricted because of devel pedi yards 0 physical
barriers.
A snowmobile may make a direct crossing of a street or hity except interstate
highway or freeway. provided: .
i
a. The crossing is made at an angle of approximately ninetJf de~es (9qO) to the
direction of the street or highway and at a place where no obfuCtion pre!v.nts a quick
and safe crossing. . I
b. The snowmobile is brought ap-to a complete stop before ~~ing the ,shoulder or
main travelled way of the highway. 1
I
C. The operator of the snowmobile must yield the right-Of-~I y to all on ,ming
traffic.
d. In crossing a divided street or highway, the crossing i~ m e ~t an int rsection of
such street or highway wi1h aoother public street or highwaYl .
e. The crossing is made during the tim~s authorized in this fhaP.ter, an
and rear lights are illuminated. (Ord. 296, 1-23-95) I
I
No snowmobile shall be operated on a street or highway "Yit$n ~e City t ~ speed
exceeding ten (10) miles per hour, nor on the Hiking and ~~g rrail at speed
exceeding twenty (20) miles per hour .. . .. .
and allow the snowmobile to ~41.
I
No snowmobile shall enter any uncontrolled intersection wi~out,makingia complete
stop. The operator shall then yield the ri~t-of-way to any v,hiCI~S or ~strians.
. ..
Subd. .&'.
Subd. $1-.
proceedini.
Notwithstanding any prohibition in this Chapter, a snowm.obhe may be o~ated on a
public thoroughfare in an emergency during the period ofi1nje wf1.en snc4~ such
thoroughfare renders travel by automobile impractical. i '
No person shall operate a snowmobile on the shoulder of th*i1qng and lking Trail
or in the ditch or embankment, e~cept for the purpose of en . g ,or leav . the trail,
or for the purpose of turning at9und. ' . '
. I
i
!
i
3. I
!
!
j
9!<: :9t 966t '6t '68
N~W~~OH NI~~~l WO~~
,
'"
Subd. 113. An operator shall bring his snowmobil~ to a stop and switch tfthe en
flagged by a police officer or ~ lIUlhorlzed uninfurmed , p$lrOJ m
Trail as pos.qible to provid~ saf~ pas.~e. .
9~8F 11888",
802.03: OPERATION GENERALLY: Except as otherwise s
authorized, it is unlawful for any person to operate a sno
of the City in the following ;manner:
Subd. 1. On a public sidewalk or walkway provided or used for pede
boulevards within any public right-of-way.
Subd. 2. On private property of another without lawful authority or e
owner or lessee.
.
Subd. 3. On any other publicly-owned lands and frozen water, includin 'ted to
park property, public or private school grounds, playgrounds, and
golf courses, except areas previously listed or authorized fo, s h yse by e proper
public authority. In such areas, such use shall be lawful and s o~obilesay be
driven in and out of such areas by the shortest route. Auth~ri 8fe8S in e City
owned by the City shall be designated by Council resolutio~ o~thstan ing
anything in this Section contained to the contrary, snowmobil opqation s be
permitted on all public bodies of water within the City, provid ~ said peration .
shall co~ply in all respects with provisions of this Chapter ad I other Ci
ordinances. '
Subd. 4.
At any place within 1 SO ft. of the shoreline on allY lake. .
I
At any place while under the influence of intoxicating liquor ot nar~tics 0 ~it
forming drugs. , .
At a rate of speed greater than reasonable or proper under all ~ sup-oundi g
circumstances. Racing is prohibited except as may be specitic4J1y autho as part
of an organized event, which authorimtioD shall be by permit itsue~ by the City
CouncU. Maximum speed limils shalJ be set from time to time1by CoWlciij;;Jution.
At any place in a careless, reckless, or negligent manner so as tp endanger +~ person
or property of another or to cause injury or damage thereto. j I
~o.as to tow any person or thing on a public street or highway 1xcept thrau use of a
ngld tow bar attached to the rear of the snowmobile. :
I
I
!
4.
Subd. ~4.
Subd. M-.
Subd.l',
Subd. B+.
9 . d
L:: :9i 966i '6i "613
I
N~W~~OH NI~~~l WO~~
~
~
***<JN3***
Subd. !l3. When the noise level of the snowmobile exceeds seventy-ei
Scale at fifty feet (SO'). .
Subd. W. Within the right-of-way of any public street or highway wi th~ City, ess the
operator shall have a valid motor vehicle driver's license iss d by the S t~ of
Minnesota or a valid snowmobile safety certificate issued by e Commis ioner of
Natural Resources, or unless accompanied by a licensed driv r who is . ly
occupying a seat in the vehicle.
Subd. 11 Q At anytime within the City between the hours of eleven 0' ~l
seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. .
,
.
Subd. 13,-:1-. Abreast of another snowmobile on the Hiking and Biking rra I expept wh n
overtaking and passing another snowmobile.
802.04:
Subd. 1.
.
Subd. 2.
Subd. 3.
Subd. 4.
L "d
EQUIPMENT: It is unlawful for any person to operate ot for the owJer to cause
or knowingly permit the ol'C'ration of a snowmobile any p1rce Within tJ}e limits of
the City 1IIIiess it is equipped with the following: I I
Standard muftlers which are properly attached and in co~t operation ~d which
reduce the noise of opetatiOll of the motor to the minimum II . for 0 eratiOll.
Mufilers shall comply with Minnesota Rules part 6100.5700, ubp~ 5 whic certifies
that a new snowmobile complies ~th the noise limitation req . ~ents Of~.'S rule.
A manufacturer shall make such a certification based on meas ents m ~ in
accordance with the SAB Recommended Practice 1192(a) as t forth in th Report of
the Vehicle Sound Level Committee, as approved by the Soci~ of Autom,btive
&gineen, September 1970 and ievised November 1973. i. i
Brakes adequate to control the movement of and to stop and hqld ~e snoWlnobile
under any conditions of operation. 1 I
. I !
A "safety or deadman" throttle in operating condition, I !
I
At least one clear lamp attached to the front, with sufficientint~nsiiy to rev ~ persons
and vehicles at a distance of at ~ one hundred 11 eet (1 OO'i~~uring e hours of
darkness under nonnal atmospheric conditions. Such head I shall be aimed
that glaring rays are not projected into the eyes of an oncomin vehicle 0 alor. It
shall also be equipped with at least one red tail lamp having a ". um qle power
of sufficient intensity to exhibit a red light plainly visible from a di~ce 0 '(lve
I ;
S. I
1
j
a:;::9t 966t"6t'613
N~W~~OH NI~~~l wo~~
FROM LARKIN HOFFMAN
I .
! h~ fi (500') ....1he rear during 1he hours of darlcness under nonnaI atmospheric
: conditions.; The eqwpment shall be in operating condition when the vehicle is
: operated~tween the hours of one-half (112) hour after sunset to one-half (112) hour
~ before $ se or at times of reduced visibility.
I
Subd. 5. I Retlecllve leriaI8Ileast sixteen (16) llqUare inch.. OD each side, furward of the
802.05: !~:C::N:::::::a~~~'::~IYro1he
. o~ ofllDOWlDobil.. upoD __ BDd highways, and MiDDosota Statutes,
sec~onsi 84.81 to 84.88 and Minnesota Statutes, chapter 169, as amended, and
: excch>t r those provisions relating to required equipment, are hereby adopted by
refeten .
802.06:
Subd. 1.
Subd. 2.
802.07:
802.08:
802.09:
Subd. 1.
Subd. 2.
89.19.1996 16: 41
.. P. 1
, "
PE~O S UNDER CERTAIN AGE:
.
;
t is unlit for any person under fourteen (14) years of age to operate on streets,
. ghwais, p bUc lands or frozen water or make a direct crossing of a street or
. ghway as operator of a snowmobile unless accompanied by a parent or guardian.
persoJk fo (14) years of age or older, but less than eighteen (18) years of age,
y o~te snowmobile on streets, highway, public lands or frozen waters as
pemutte<l un er this Section and make a direct crossing of a street or highway only if
~e has i~ his ediate possession a valid snowmobile safety certificate issued by the
yommi~ion r of Natural Resources.
Jt i. UDIa: for 1he 0WII0r of a snowmobile ro penoit the snowmobile ro be 0)lenlIed
~ntrary to provisions of this Section.
I
I
!
LEA' G SNOWMOBILE UNATTENDED: Every person leaving a
snowptot) e in a public place shall lock the ignition, remove the key, and take the
same;wi th~~
.
: CHA~lNp ANIMALs FORBIDDEN: It is unlawful to intentionally drive,
: chase'lver, or kill any animal, wild or domestic, with a snowmobile.
I ,
I
J Lrrm G AND OBSTRUcnONS:
o persoJ) I deposit paper,litter, rubbish, or debris on public or private property,
o throw pa . litter, rubbish, or debris from snowmobiles.
I ,
~p persod I place obstructions. including ice blocks, on publicly-owned lands or
trpzen waters as to interfere with the lawful use thereof by the public.
I
! 6.
.
.
FROM ~RRKIN HOFFMRN
09.19.1996 16=42
P. 2
Subd. 3. i
I
~
All tr4ffic.control devices used for routing snowmobile traffic away from private and
public Prer!y sba1I be located on the same private or public property and sIuill be in
place no lier than Novembec I and sba1I be removed on or bcfure April I s.
SQ2.IO: 1 ~~~? ~~:~~r'::: loaalllCCe"tppints III
I
VlbJTIONS: Any person violating the provisions oflhis Chapter is guiJty of
8D,lisdtmeanor. (Ord.245, 10-28-91)
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
802.110: I
0240945.01
7.
***END***
.... '.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION REGARDING
HOOKUP TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City Council in 1995 called for a review of City policy relating to
hookup to the municipal water system in September, 1996 (Resolution No. 95-93); and
WHEREAS, said review has been completed and policy reviewed at a Council
work session September 16, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood that the policies established in Resolution No. 95-93 are hereby rescinded; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it shall remain the policy of the City to not
require hookup to the municipal water system for single family residential properties.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHOREWOOD this 23rd day of September, 1996.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
-It ~/t
"'. ...
FROM L H 0 L LTD. 15TH FLOOR
.
.
09.19.1996 16:21
P. 2
MEMOAANDUM
LARKIN, HOFfMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
TO:
FROM:
Jim Hurm, ~ity Administrator
Tim-Keane,;City Attorney
D^, TE:
September 19, 1996
PriVate WeUs
Our File No.: 18636..00
RE:
You inquired if Section 903.05 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is unambiguous as it
relates to whether a property owner connected to the municipal water system may constrUct a
private well eVen thOugh th~ property owner did not previously operate a private well. It seems
to me that the Ordinance is 'not clear on this point. 1 have, therefore, a proposed Ordinance
amendment attached for Council consideration to clarify this ambiguity.
Should you bave any questions, please contact me at 896..3203.
TJK/psb
Attachment
0241499.01
=tt-~B
-' "."
FROM L H D L LTD. 15TH FLOOR
09.19.1996 16:21
P. 3
ORDINANCE NO. 96 ._
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
AN OR])INANCE RELATING TO PRIVATE WELLS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA,
OlIDAINS:
Sc;ct{Qn J. Section 903.05 of the Shorewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to add:
903.05. PRIVATE WELLS:1 Private wells may be constructed or maintained and
continued in use after connection is made to the water system. provided
there is no means of ctOss..connection between the private well and the Municipal water
system at any time. '-lose bibbs that will enable the cross-connection of the two (2)
systems are prohibited on internal piping of the well supply system. The threads of the .
boiler drain of the well volume tank shall be removed or the boiler drain hose bibb
replaced witJi a sink faucet.
SItion Z. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
p . lieation. .
ADOPTED BY TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
MINNESOTA this _ day of September. 1996.
AtTEST:
Robert B. Bean. Mayor
! I . . i
James C. Hurm, City AdminJstrator
.
. ,
0241491.01 TO UPDATg. PRESS F9
W Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
Environmental Services
September 10, 1996
"',
Mr. James C. Hurm
City Administrator
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorew9od,~ 55331
,~'I
~' .;;,
jC_ ,-
1996
Ii;
;:! '
G'
Sv
-~--_..
RE: Receipt of requested information
1996 Grant Program
,
Dear Mr. Hurm:
.
On September 6, 1996 the Metropolitan Council received the material that was forwarded to us in
response to our letter dated July 23, 1996. We have reviewed the material and found it sufficient
to begin drafting an agreement. Once we have completed a draft copy of an agreement specific to
your community's III study, we will forward a copy for your review.
Under the original 1996 grant and loan program description, it was outlined that work done prior
to the date of the agreement between the community and the Metropolitan Council, would not be
eligible for reimbursement under either the grant or loan program. However, taking into account
the time of year, and in an attempt to take advantage of the time available this fall to perform
work, the Metropolitan Council will accept documentable expenses relating to the outlined study,
incurred after August 16, 1996.
.
It is the Council's intent to still complete, and have in acceptable form all loan and grant
agreements during the first week in October.
If you have any questions regarding the time schedule for the eligible studies, or require additional
information, please don't hesitate to call me at 229-2151.
Sincerely,
\ ", ) ~ (~/;;J'>'-'
r, ; '~l.-... cJ,"
K ~6 L. Colvin, PE
Sr. Staff Engineer
KLC;klc
cc: Bill Moore, MCES
Don Bluhm, MCES
Ed DeLaForest, HDR Engineering, Inc.
a:\letter\grntcitY\8woodacp.doo
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1633
(612) 222-8423
Fax 229-2183 TDD/TIY 229-:: 4tCJ C-
An Equal Opportunity Employer
\ .
.
CKNO
19254
19255
19256
19257
19258
19259
19260
19261
19262
19263
19264
19265
19266
19267
19268
19269
19270
19271
19272
19273
19274
19275
19276
19277
19278
19279
19280
19281
19282
19283
19284
19285
19286
19287
19288
19289
19290
19291
19292
19293
19294
.
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE SEPTEMBER 11,1996
TO WHOM ISSUED PUPKSE
MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AUGUST SALES & USE TAX
BROWNING FERRIS IND. WASTE REMOVAL
CITY OF MINNETONKA WATER PURCHASE
SHOREWOOD PARKS FOUND. PARK PLAYGROUND SIGNS
SUPERAMERICA FUEL
US WEST COMMUNICATION
BELLBOY CORP. L1QUORIMISC
DAY DISTRIBUTING BEERlMISC
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY L1OUORIWINE/MISC
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR L1QUORIWINE
LAKE REGION VENDING MISC
LEEF BROS MATS
MARK VII BEERlMISC
MARLIN'S TRUCKING FR8GHf
NORTH STAR ICE MISC
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS WINE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEERlMISC
FIRST STATE BANK FED/FICA TAX
PEPA PERA
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCO\1P
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ANOKA CTY SUPPORT/COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID
MNDEPARTMENTOFREVENUE STATETAX
AT&T LONG DISTANCE
KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES RIGHTS OF WAY TASK FORCE
JOSEPH LUGOWSKI BOOT REIMB
METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT AUGUST SAC
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MUNICIPALS BANQUET
BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
JOSEPH PAZANDAK SEC 125 REIMB/MILEAGE
ALAN ROLEK SEC 125 REIMB
MELINDA CREED SEWER OVERPAYMENT
BELLBOY CORPORATION UQUOR
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISClSUPPLlES
MIDWEST COCA-COLA MISC
DAY DISTRIBUTING BEERlMISC
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEERlMISC
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC WINE
Page 1
AMOUNT
$15,917.00
33.66
136.24
2,225.00
549.92
207.88
2,539.20
9,457.80
3,057.50
2,608.82
608.15
25.17
12,898.50
170.40
1,332.60
845.75
59.90
25,340.00
7,579.14
2,218.13
796.30
842.00
139.44
1,246.68
5.49
187.50
514.00
126.00
5,346.00
40.00
100.00
5,917.07
580.17
100.72
5.76
3,660.00
261 .00
1,118.16
3,457.75
18,258.45
483.80
.
.
CKNO
19295
19296
19297
19298
19299
19300
19301
19302
19303
19304
19305
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE SEPTEMBER 11, 1996
. TO WHOM ISSUED
GTE DIRECTORIES
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO
LAKE REGION VENDING
LEHMANN FARMS
MARLIN'S TRUCKING
PAUSTlS WINE COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
THE VICTORIA GAZETTE
THE WINE COMPANY
AJRPC6E
ADVERTISING
L1QUORIWINE/MISC
WINE
MISC
MISC
FRBGHT
WINE
L1QUORIWINE/BEER
L1QUORIWINE
ADVERTISING
WINE
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
Page 2
AMOUNT
$84.10
3,182.59
1,084.77
416.31
81.20
36.80
673.82
5,642.22
1,579.60
41.25
194.70
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
CHECK~ VENDOR NAME
SEPT 23, 1996 COUNCIL MTG
DESCf~IPTIOf"J.
19306 JEFF REINHART DBA
AUGUST JANITORIAL
19307 BIFFS, INC.
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
DEPT.
PI [.'1 0 U f".1 T
f''1UN BLDG
325, ... ()l:)
F)f~R}<'3 &
El~'() H C~CI
19308 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. ROCK STREETS 330.28
ROCK r)ARKS & 330~27
*** TOTAL FOR BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, 660.55
19309 COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM LIGHT REPAIRS 7/VH &XMAS TRAF CON
200.91
19310 CONTRACTORS CALCULATING S DATA REPORT SUBSCRIPTION PUB WKS
19311 DAWSON BLACKTOPPING, INC. CATHCART PARKING LOT
19312 ESI COMMUNICATIONS, INC
.;)3J::5 EF;~ICK~30r.1,. F~OLF E.(~.
89.00
11,500,.00
BATTERY BACKUP+ SALESTAX MUN BLDG
31(,.. ()3
ASSESSOR FEES PROF SER
ASSESSOR SUPPLIES PROF SER
*** TOTAL FOR ERICKSON, ROLF E.A.
J93J4 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF
SIGNAL LT-OAK ST
3RD QTR SEWER FEE
*** TOTAL FOR EXCELSIOR-CITY OF
"Z 0 ,::; ',: .Z .Z
.....);." 1_)...J...~.I.. 0.....)
J08,.84
::..~ ~ IS) t~ ::2 .. .1"7
TRAF CON 123.18
SEWER DE 1,932.85
2, c).56, .. ()3
19315 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL WATER DE
19316 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO
1987 JETT[F,l
193J7 FRANKLIN QUEST CALENDARS
CALEND(;~F<S
*** TOTAL FOR FRANKLIN QUEST
.;)5J8 GOPHEF< ST(.~TE ONE....CALL, IN ONE
m~E
*** TOTAL FOF-(
CALL SERVICE-AUG
CALL SERVICE-AUG
GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL
J9519 HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY
VEHICLE P()F<TS
V'EHI CLE P(~F~T(3
FOR HOPKINS PARTS COMPAN
*** TOT ~~L
19320 LK MTKA CONSERV. DISTRICT 4TH QTR LMCD
19321 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY IRRIGATION
19322 M C I TELECOMMUNICATIONS LONG DISTANCE
19323 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT OCTOBER TREATMENT
19324 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
(\SPH(\L..T
19325 OFFICE DEPOT
OFF r CE ~:)U:::)PI... I ES
1.9326 M'r~~NC:l)MM r:)~~G~'(NG
):) (;~ c; r:: F:
Page 3
1,304" .58
J4, 377 .50
FINANCE 41.85
PLANNING 41.86
8~5 ,. 71
'/J~~TEJ-( DE
SEI,..IEF<~ DE
3-' .. ~,.:?
3'7 ,. c:~3
-'5,~~~5
CITY GAF~
PUB '/.IKS
8'4 ~2()
EA .12
Co r.. ''4''''',
t.::,_~c.. '" ,,-,:I.L
COUNCIL
3, '921 .. ()8
F)~~F(~<.S 8<.
8.71
f'iUr.j BLDG
24,.22
SEWER DE 40,059.00
~3TF;:E[TS
~::1 ~ '7 ()"/ ,~ (;I;~
GEf.,.j GOVT
i,::, J. -/ _. .~? (::1
'), 'j
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
SEPT 23. 1996 COUNCIL MTG
CHECK~ VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT.
At10Ui'.J.T
19327 MOUND-CITY OF 4TH QTR FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PRO
19328 MUNITECH, INC. OCTOBER MAINTENANCE
OCTOBER MAINTENANCE
*** TOTAL FOR MUNITECH, INC.
1,790. I':.)
WATER DE 4,550.00
SEWER DE 1,950.00
6,500.00
19329 OHLIN SALES, INC
PHONE ACCESSORIES/BATTER PROT INS
127,.11
19330 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE
CH{~ I N COr"J.NECTOh'S
.1 ();~)~31
ORR.SCHELEN,MAYERON/ASSOC JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
JUNE/JULY ENGINEERING
*** TOTAL FOR ORR,SCHELEN,MAYERON/
.
19332 PARRANTO ASSOCIATES, INC TRIAL PREPERATION
19333 POTTS, KENNETH N.
AUGUST PROSECUTIONS
19334 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT
TOCII_S
19335 SHORE WOOD TREE SERVICE
REMOVE & TRIM TREES
~l~;i~,3t~
SHORE WOOD TRUE VALUE SHOP/OFFICE SUPPLIES
SHOP/OFFICE SUPPLIES
*** TOTAL FOR SHORE WOOD TRUE VALUE
.
CITY G()h~
t18 M 02
PFW.JECTS
10,146.16
2 , 254 .. 00
~2() ~ 3~~.S,~ ~~~.5
1 ~::I -, M .5 .~:t
164.00
-------- 4,964.29
-------- 3.105.40
-------- 1.679.48
4~2 , f~E::lt) ,. .1~3
i:")f~OF ~3 E F~~ 1 . 009 . ~3~2
Pt~OF ~3E:t~ 1 . 508 . 33
CITY Gf.'iF< 149 . .5;i:
TF<EE i'1(~'iI 28~3 . 00
CITY Gf.'iF<~
GEN GOVT
27.64
9.67
17.97
19337 SO LK MTKA PUB SAFETY DEP OCTOBER PAYMENT POLICE P 36,046.29
JULY BOOKING FEE POLICE P 108.91
*** TOTAL FOR SO LK MTKA PUB SAFET 36,155.20
19338 SUBURBAN TIRE CO.. INC.
TIm:: REP~~IF<
193:39 TEr".J.r".J.r:~l'-.J.T
SE:f'~J._
PUB ItJKS
l3 M Cl~1
PUB I;.)K.$
.:;. . 48
19340 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC MINUTES PLANNING 176.25
MINUTES GEN GOVT 208.25
*** TOTAL FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITE 384.50
.Le..... ..\
.. ~;.I :) (~~. _, .
TONKA BAY-CITY OF
CRESCENT BEACH WEED CONT PARKS &
18:::,.00
19342 TREES, TNC
TF<:(l(J,~~,PL.(l(J,T TF<:E[
19343 TWIN CITY WAT[R CLINIC
1/,)(iTEFi:TE:::)T I (J,G
19,':,4/1 Ur--'i I TOC, ~\'E(J,T (jL :::.I:::h'V I c.:;:~::
l..I(.! T FOFi'hS
.'., (- ..'j (~~
:vi i::~ f-_~
;"'; 1 ;,) ;~~~ J. hi j!.~ 1 ,"
Page 4
.1.28..00
1t.)(jTCh' DE
2() . ()()
C:IT\' Gt'iP
49(J..O;"
CHi::C:f<
T'y'Pi::
C:Oi"i
.
COi"i
COr'1
COr"j
COr"j
COh
C01"j
COl'''j
COr1
COf"i
COf"i
Cm1
C011
C01'1
cm1
cm1
cm1
COh
cor"j
CC)h
C01'1
COl"i
COt"j
C01"j
COi"1
cm1
cm1
CC)i"1
COI"j
cm1
COl"j
COI"j
C0l'1
COi'1
COM
COl"i
COl"i
C01'1
C O/"j
COi'1
C 0/'1
c:m'i
C (Wi
C01'1
C()f"i
C:Oi''i
COI"i
C C) f'i
COl"i
COl''i
COh
COh
COi'i
.
r":.lJ{-"i
CHEC:~<
O(in::
917 (;'6
9 17 96
':;. ..L '7 'S) 6
(} ..L7 96
':;1 17 'S':i <'.:.,
9 17 ')'::.'
') .17 ':'':)6
':;'1 7 0:;; 6
') 17 96
9 ,17 '~;' ':.'
'9 17 96
917 96
'9 17 96
9 .17 96
9 17 96
9 J.7 96
9 ,17 96
9 17 96
9 17 96
Sol ., ...,
..l.,
9 17
9 17
9 17
9 17
'S' I~:~
9c,
96
96
'?I~\
9 ~L 7 19~:.\
9 17 96
'9 17 96
':;1 .17 96
9 ~L 7 96
9 17 96
9 17 96
917 96
9 17 96
9 .17 96
9 .17 96
9 .17 96
9 .17 96
9 17 96
9 17 96
9 17 96
':-;, 17 96
9 .L7 96
9.L7 96
917 9(:,
') .17 9\~,
9.L7 96
9 17 ')6
9 .L7 96
.:;; .1 -7 r:;.J ~~;.
-r 1"7 ':;J(::o
..;, 17 '.,,'6
1. .-7 ,) I~:;o
,,~} .L "7 ~~ ~':.'
J. / ,)(:
CHEC::<
1~:EG T > Ti~:r<
;::MPLOYEi:: rh~ME
l'--lUl"iBEf-"
101 SCOTT M. BARTLETT
1.10 CONNIE D. BASTYR
115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN
120 ROBERT 8. BEAN
125 BRUCE E. BENSON
215 EUGENE L. BRISTOL
220 MARY LOU BROSCH
225 JOEL L. CAPE3IUS
325 ANGELA M. COLE
375 JODI A. DALLi'1AN
500 CHARLES S. DAVIS
702 STEVEN J. DZURAK
775 JAl"iES C. EAKINS
835 GAIL M. FINNEY
840 REBECCA L. FISH
870 KELLY P. FLANAGAN
902 KATHLEEN B. FRADETTE
1105 KERI ANNE GRAF
1160 STEPHANIE A. HABER
.1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT
.1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN
1415 S~AWN D. HEMPEL
.1445 JASON D. HENDRICKSON
1550 JAMES C. HURi'1
.1575 GLENN E. ILLIG
1700 JEFFREY A. JENSEN
1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON
.1822 LINDA A. JOHNSON
1950 MARTIN L. JONES
2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON
2302 IRENE KRONHOLM
2402 CARLA LABORE
2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER
2772 CLIFFORD WOODROW LOVE
2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOWSKI
2805 JASON R. LUND
2850 JILL D. MAJESTIC
2930 JENNIFER T. MCCARTY
2935 PAMELA MCDAVITT
2970 KAREN V. MIESEN
2974 DEBORAH J. MILLER
3000 THERESA L. NAAB
3100 LAWRENCE A. NICCUM
3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN
3410 BARBARA R. OBERMEYER
3442 T}~ERESA M. PAETZEL.
3452 CAROL A. PAULSEN
350() JOSEPH E~ PA,ZANDAK
3510 CHRIS A. PERRY
3536 CYRIL A. PETERSON
3542 NANCY f"i. PETERSON
354.5 NORMA 0. Pj~'TERS()N
~.~)0~ J~:ANN'INE H~ P"[CI-IA
":.'1':'-'( j!.; i) ;';H-'J J. >~. j.. _
;:;~ :", r: [; ,,:~ i '.
Page 6
CHE::CK
t.1L-WiSER
2.10988
2:L0989
210990
2109(;:'1
210992
2.10993
21 099 I.:'j.
210995
2~L0996
2.1.0997
210998
210999
2.11000
211001
211002
2.11003
211004
:2.1.1005
21.1006
2.11007
2.1100B
211009
211010
21.101.1
211012
21.1013
21.1014
2110.15
211016
21.10.17
21.10.18
2.110.19
2.11020
2.1.1021
211022
211023
211024
2-LL025
21.1026
2110'27
21102B
211V29
2.L.iO:SO
2J.1031
2j...i.0:~2
2J.1033
:2LL034
21.1 0 :5~::,
211u3c,
21..LO::::7
2110,~~8
~? J.,.L()~:::::-.~)
"2 .l..l.. () (:~. (";
CHECK
AMOUrH
33..':;a'9
234.08
1327.25
230.87
184.70
36.37
39.99
73..61
2()() 04 93
36.07
747..02
78.78
7.15.6.1
BO.OO
36..37
40.41
39 .. 9~?
40.41
94.30
554..28
569.1.9
252.20
476.02
1692.04
317.BO
880..64
_.-r.: ,c.-.
OL.:" .. C.\I~
96,,97
.1.14.03
632..56
53..21
94.20
6.55 . 9=-
31.52
99.1.47
.112.55
96.68
1.82.28
7..28
82,.43
4.1.2.L
687.21
1047 " 2:':-
847.67
43,.(:.13
47.28
3.5"..1.5
.L057.76
_5t_~<)J
-' .....
/IJ " "'-~:I ~:)
9S"?c.J
.:~)';) ,.),)
.
.
CHEC.i-<
T \IF:JE:
CC!M
C:Oh
Cm'i
COl1
cOr';
COI"'j
COi'"'i
COr1
COi'"'i
COI"j
COM
Cm1
cm1
CHECK.
i~c:GISTL.I:<'
CHECK
D(~YT E
EMPLOYEE i'J,14i"1E
r-1UMi3EF~
"OJ 17 9,':, 3615 T(::)MARA LYNt-.j REED
. ,
9 17 '==it. 3~)32 Mf;I-<~Y L.. l.(t::UT I Mf:)i'.j
9 17 96 3701 m< I AN M. fWERICf'(
~} 17 96 3800 AI.J)r-! .J '" ROLE}(
9 17 9(".> 3900 CHf.( I STOFJHEh~ E. SCHr1 I [)
r:;i 17 96 4012 MARY M. SCHMITT
(;i 17 96 4200 FRANK i~ . Sf-lAIN .J t~~ .
':-.:; 17 96 4402 JM.1E F' ,. STEIN
9 17 96 4500 KRISTI STO\lER
') 17 96 4575 REBECCA t' T(;;F<~VIH
1-1..
S) 17 96 4577 P(;~11ELA T. TURNQUIST
9 17 96 4750 i~ALPH A.. "JEHLE
9 17 96 4900 DEAN H. YOUNG
****TOTALS::l<*:*:*
Page 7
CHEC:'(
NUh8E::}:;~
:211042
21104,3
LLL044
:2 .11 04':.
:2.LL046
211047
211048
2.11049
2110.50
21.1051
2.LL052
:2.11053
211054
CHECK
{lMOUI'.H
.73 _ .51;)
8').47
e,'?.. 9.5
L142.50
455.14
3f) :. \~(;)
1~32 . 28
81..21
:U34.. 70
299.00
617..36
684..23
14.20
2~Zt)~3~:~ '" ~l8
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS
SHOREWOOD RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED FOR PEDESTRIAN
SAFETY ON SMITHTOWN ROAD. IN THE PAST 10 DAYS, A GROUP OF
CONCERNED CITIZENS HAVE CIRCULATED THIS PETITION
STATING:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF SHOREWOOD
SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFF STREET HIKING AND
BIKING TRAIL ALONG SMITHTOWN ROAD FROM COUNTY ROAD 19
TO THE CITY OF VICTORIA BORDER. IN AN EVER-GROWING
COMMUNITY, WE ARE CONCERNED FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND
BELIEVE SUCH A TRAIL WILL GREATLY BENEFIT OUR COMMUNITY
AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF OUR LIVES.
I 2D SHOREWOOD ADULTS SIGNED THIS PETITION
IN ADDITION, A "CHILDREN'S PETITION" WAS ALSO CIRCULATED AS
WE RECOGNIZE THEIR IMPORTANCE AS CITIZENS OF OUR CITY,
AND NEED TO BE PRO - ACTIVE IN THEIR HEALTH AND WELL BEING.
THEIR PETITION READS:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED CHILDREN OF SHOREWOOD
RESIDENTS SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFF STREET
HIKING AND BIKING TRAIL ALONG SMITHTOWN ROAD FROM
COUNTY ROAD 19 TO THE CITY OF VICTORIA BORDER. WE WANT
TO BE SAFE WHEN RIDING BIKES OR WALKING TO: VISIT OUR
FRIENDS, SCOUT AND CAMPFIRE ACTIVITIES AFTER SCHOOL,
ACTIVITIES AT THE PLAYGROUND OR BALLFIELDS AFTER SCHOOL,
THE HENNEPIN REGIONAL TRAIL, OR JUST GETTING FRESH AIR
AND EXERCISE. WE BELIEVE SUCH A TRAIL WILL GREATLY
BENEFIT OUR COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF OUR
LIVES.
GJ5
SHOREWOOD CHILDREN SIGNED THIS PETITION
ALL TOTAL, THERE ARE 185 SIGNATURES FROM
SHOREWOOD RESIDENTS ON THIS PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS.
PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
· THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES WILL ONLY INCREASE ON
SMITHTOWN ROAD AS WE SEE DEVELOPMENT IN THE WESTERN
SECTOR OF SHOREWOOD AND EASTERN VICTORIA.
· WE ENCOURAGE OUR RESIDENTS TO ENJOY THE NATURAL
BEAUTY OF OUR CITY -- AND THAT SHOULD HAPPEN WITHOUT
CONCERN FOR BODilY HARM, INJURY OR DEATH CAUSED BY
PEDESTRIANS SHARING AN UNSAFE ROAD WITH MOTORIZED
VEHICLES.
· THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MAY REQUIRE STUDENTS LIVING
WITHIN A ONE MILE RADIUS TO WALK TO AND FROM SCHOOL.
THIS COULD BE A REALITY AS WE LOOK AT SCHOOL BUDGET
CUTS. LAST YEAR, MTKA DISTRICT #276 CUT $250,000 FROM
THEIR TRANSPORTATION BUDGET. THAT FIGURE COULD BE
DOUBLED IN THE 1997 - 98 SCHOOL BUDGET REDUCTIONS.
· WE MUST REJECT THE BIASED AND UNINFORMED VIEW OF THE
"SHOREWOOD PRESERVATION TEAM'S" ASSERTION THAT NO
ONE WANTS AN OFF STREET TRAil. THE TRUTH IS, RESIDENTS
DO!
· WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION
ON THIS ISSUE. WE ARE WILLING TO ASSIST YOU IN ANY WAY
THAT WE CAN TO MAKING THIS OFF STREET TRAIL A REALITY.
· THANK YOU !
" PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS~\-\l
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the constructiori of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
---
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
,)// ?PI1/{ ~ .,?~O g~4 7Jn~
P~A!~~ fi?k '2::7&-&-0 t5~vJ?,i. 474-(;4/2
Date
C)-/z-qfL,
9-/2- C;G.
(/7V - /j-d< 6
9 -/.?-??c:-
J.)}lf 5~ ()
1/4 - I .:;;; -r C?,
Ur- V71- r~/
{-IJ-crb
~_.7
~-.,
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS C!i7 "
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. Inan ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Address Phone (optional),
-
~/OSS 5f)1Ate~ 12J W-70-S33g
S~~O ~~';....f ~~ \ ~1'~ ~ 2o<)S-
S !-O a ;1J f3l, 714-711
5'9;;, {J tlftnG f ~ '-170 -I 71./D
II II 11- . \
~'\
L
:Yo Slo ~j
c2ljlo;O ~\e~ ~~
11 --
c(?t(--3(,., C
4il{ -7d.1 ~
l \. !
/" -u? ;-' -
J""'-oJ ... . (:
6r ~s- ;'v I' "lrt R d
1(;7/10
e 9 ~ 7&
r/h tN' 17 Ifp tr1l2 -55lft;' 1/7ff/
- " i ,/ /
I .. . J-J7vl-~3 l-/s'7 7117/7{
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS ~
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional) Date
Mo\\~ ~~{)l1h
SLtSa 11 11 +I. e it' Cu1.c/~
J~ ~{-vvLI,-rr
6~ AJCIt- ldK 0tdic-
1\1"~~,~
~~~
(/
IStf45 Grant Lr.) t"en"l-- 'QJ~ t+7'-f -577 J
.s-~.JS' (br;u,d: L..orflAIl: J<CJ. t1:to - 89;1 Y
sL(6'S {c;A~ -(~ ~
2~ 2/ \" f'J {r~ '6L-{t(( j 410 0 (of{ 0
5"1.{'I5 G'rc..--r Ln , ? ~V') LI)4f-517/
S Lf ~) 4-~nrl:5renz. Rd, 47()-j1J. '1
oq - ;;l.3 -C1lc
or -d3-tC-
Z3 >cfT Jt
Q-;)1-Qc
7 -,J3-- ~
9/>>/96
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS '\ \ .
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
!
Date
I g-;- 5hcic..::h~ y louuz..
~l7o- t./05S'
,;:(& ~'1~~hC""<.N1J6cJ O~K:5:..oI"- Lf70-0Q"'!'1
'-\-14..- 51 S '-t
9- /9- 7b
q / ,q /'ivo
~-I
l (
i,
'-i7L{ - fO
J O-Y\{l S ?o.. (\ (} C' e>tou \ OS \ \
~C\(\i~ ~ ro via. e brOil \ II "') II
~a J!\ II
~b~~ Ch Le~.~
/ I
fI
I'
~70 -<60~<6 9-(q-~ 6
It
\. ,
l\. I \
Ofl
. I
~rl\o\ ~ lLa'bc;L~ ~
'\ c \ - q \II 'i C) \ 1$
"
, '
"
il
I'
I'
"r
1~-0
l(~2~S OO-( 19 O( --\y .~\ 4l0'14~ Cf!tq/7
L.~2bS- ~ ~--ry--- y7y -b33L. 7h 5_
~~( JU 0--(1- (C'4-,f- T(. t() '1 -C Yu 7-
;J. L ) Z 5' ,,~{;,{ j, ;'/'. )14'.i.JJ/~J D i vl,{. if) (; / '7 c;, G
ILC;/;~ h( /J
:Jih).'Yf7?-,n:--. f(J ~rA) ~/)t11)/;; ~ C' 1
.I . J '- /
L Jl?'}j_Y 0 (Ifill
"
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS l
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
JJGdL' ,~dQ. ;)~. {D5, ()d lad no -LDd6,
/ /~d ,4 JJ~ ;). '" rYe:5' /Ja.A l-..l{! '-I7tJ- / 37J.-
! ~,~IJ kb' ~/o- r&c;~
K,~~~t~i.-TQ.
13Q.v~ I-:\\A-~
~ 4- ~07./-
j-AJ l/7 - J3b
~ s- S'1~~ ~ f2.j 47 tt' ). tj; 1.. ~
f 8j-o Su u lcle ( R,: \ ~ \e L h. 41'0 -( <:ill
u
2g~~~ ~~\J~ BnJ~ D.r. 41~-logl
Date
7- /7-9[,
1;JQ/1rp
i;;9/9C
7-20-
1jJ-ljyr.:,
~ III /7b
I. /
Of 17.. \ I q ~
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional) Date
~ ll--tc~ . ~Z{-;-Bre-t\-+rrctrftv (h'-f-/t>(.,'Z q/I~
c. al~/'\ 5 6 ZS trefrtn ~"c;tl\~V]J If 7 \.f /0 (P8 tf/I i
, 562)- l' fih;lclll/~(;vtz;J 7 L{ -)fdh q/J {j
Lax&{ c;;limme1r' .~ ~n~ lli'. ~w:eil'Oocl Lf70'/X:; 9/19
mit Q,.-ff~ I (f2n; 'i ~ LY ~retUl,(/d "- ff)G 1;
/ \. fA fA( -; L//u)4 /575.5 f?i?'J-vhiclje. ,)r ...5hr;rt'iL~J()d li7thf9& 7 '1,;!.3 C
Iii lid.~---lI/;~(!,h~f'-S I) If, I
----
-" ,
01 ;;I 4!
-;--.
v
. . PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS (})
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
/i-,'Aj{ i ~4/V ~
/y) 'I (_"-Y ) -_;L;-:t
-~
,~
Date
'J ,,?nt ~ r /1
=c' & J 1,J (i(C( ('/h Cf'{(_
471-00 8 S
7/:23
/
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS fiO's
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the constructi~
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
.
. ~~. {dSU5~~~//?LJ 4@~//J3
. . ~ . . &,5 - I, tvd"" ~ ct-lO-0B0
Jrlavk ~{,~Ju- dC,)1fo u), 01J,~' ~f- 470 - &::/753 w
i(f)/f,iULr:tt+ln:-- J54t0 Vii 1ft IfUJiJiJe( {tvrf( 474 g Clo 1
Q_-? ~/ 2f~/5/ ~1Z.-- ~~l :'--/7</- L.(ltf? r.;J//fi:'
( .
, Q..., . ,- ~7 '~11 ~ trvVY\ 'G( Lr7(/~ l( -
/$,4-.(' I3z//( d:5r55' ck/A#);!//Z kc/
~/"1 ~
UfJ/-m ~ ~ #1' "
j)~ - · ~ ii,,, 7-L-tJ-j'6
&.(WARc.J c, JAl1JdT 2s-9tJd S/YJ/-dJ7;U.I/t/ ft.! YJ'I-f'/S't - 9~/-9?
~ ~,!M4. J' ,'-(..~ EtI/tIt/~ M flf- L2D 9.z1-1.
, .f~'-I {- EuruLiA 7<.d. 'I t '/- /1.5)-- 9- 2../- ~
n. 474--93f1 9-21..9~
'-/1'/- fff7 1-21-fl:
~.~ 3 ~ OJ / I~.& 1 l./l~" 47Gj-C;C 5'C
-'13
/7TzJ/YE
'2
.f'7;~~~ tj-.J,Ht
I"',.w;,'~ ~, / /.
S//l/i1ITn)fiJ t;1) ~11-?J20 tJ=.L/fCfl
I
Date
97';7-~
~~-~
9-d-C '-jfc
9 - 20-1{~
wE5Jf ~~~5'11tJ
~6 ~J~AJ d-Sq J..o
~/~1V,lj
l:tJ
PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS @;) ~
We the undersigned residents of Shorewood, support the construction of
an off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County
Road 19 to the City of Victoria border. In an ever-growing community, we
are concerned for pedestrian safety and believe such a trail will greatly
benefit our community and enhance the quality of our lives.
Name (as registered to vote) Address Phone (optional)
--rhere,'ja II Ze~6y 5b8O Chr,"1cpher Kcl. 470-9gS2
50 -he, 070-
'- 10
Date
9-1C7-9b
9- _u6
1- /1- .,
9'-1(,9~
~~ ~ 5{yc,-S- ~~r2J
[, IIU)) i.,j WiLeO)( :J-61 5" C~v'I's.J-ooLer /ZJ
t I /I~!{;NO (I { (
o I""J..:fv -, yJ (.12 l LJ 6 ~() ~.. I flip i'l ""' - j
47//- ;2y:/-y
11 - '7 14 B
9-/'?-9t
;-/8-16
\ \ i I
i I I ( L)
Ljo/ - 05 C> r
'}. /,t-tb
)J
) I
) ,
} /
'..I
Sf:? cht;.s(J ~~r ~d
;:;C-fex.., v C!4'}G.:u.v'C;..-o~') O{~
1.{7 cJ -1 dO I
i7D - -S-Lf1 (
<:('/8 -9(.
r .
./ -
{. ~~ C.vA-v ~
(j - i 9 - 9 b
~e th~U~~~i~~;~:~ !:~!!l~O~d~~~~~:n~!u~~of~:S1-(
off-street hiking and biking trail along SmithtownRoa.d from County Road 19 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends, . Scout
and Campfire activities at school, activities atthe playground I ballfields after school, the
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such a trail will
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life.
Name
AQe (.optional) Address
Phone (optional) Date
If
I'
(I'
II
~ ~\o \-\('^~<1Ct(,
~lo~'l5 ()CA.~ ..~af .{f~
~ ~5':- t../M.
. .~~C<dvi:bIdj- /()d~ f1Jh/
r~ .~~~lb6?,t~kIt;;;fr.
~ ,~~i.2b11 () · O'l,kL.k+ Tv",,1
ie' Z-fpJ'10 0& ,jaiQ
AU , q 0 o~ l.aa.-r 1V-aiQ
6~~ Sf. A\ba.ni 80Jj I?d.
/~ I Z r
. ~ 0 /'2- 5--
.
~
~. fLAN\
c.. Q f\ f)a f fb~o.V\' II II II "
C 0 L L i h 812 ^n \\ (\ I' \\
5Aay1r) Oft '.i'. BeQ~".."5;)iE .'.511lIbrA YLSB~......Rd,q-~J~6
j~ l~. .i.S-&1()Bo~Y\SY.u>. .. ...i. .'. .' ........q!:J.l/qir"
. Sh()bJb, ~er ...... · 'Q 't)YJ .g(ntb-~d';rl~~<O('- . '.~ /pl}o,f(,
(1~el fW~ M'.. '.i .'aKV05. t1.~ \Aer.....5ti 0~e'" .~'_ ..i.i.... .....i9/2(!qG
kencer i --'S6rj ;), 't t.; (,0 ~... . J7'",Ite.. 71q; I . . 9/.l1/Q 6
b.rdJi..,a-fe;I p'qq6'o ~ft.l-lkH q(~I/<IG
!1/~bt6
ili~~
qj/1/ t(b
~bqlcr~
R!\"/'b
9 ;Al/q~
CHILDREN'S PETITION FOR SAFE STREETSiO
We the undersigned, children of Shorewood residents support the construction of an
off-street hiking and biking trail along Smlthtown Road from County Road '19 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends, Scout
and Campfire activities 'at school, activities at the playground I ballfields after school, the '
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such atrail,!,iII '
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life. - '
Name Aqe (optional) Address. Phone (ootional) Date.
1ft> l" C Y Li~ 7 2-7055 ~~1<J 4(o-533~ C1/rzlrP
6 ~ &oho G2tfe 4. d I' /\{ (r
-.:K'EulA CA\ fEu-4t\)b 15 QCfOO. AFro~ R-f) trlL{7171 rtl/1CJ
\Iv' -e. 'Q ~ '7 5'\2.0 A.f\vn 1ti 414 - 1140 ' "I ( \-vler..,
. 1JJtJ.K ~n .. \ s %10 .~ tj. ,.. 410'O"n1'0Jft1!i
/:7aJt4 f1tVc&- /?C/frt rdlfJrG, 411- rtH:/11f<;/
r1~kVI_~~Y\lt; ~OCA~-f,fL{. ~~7 ... ~,~
B:lerThQAl\t-9,..,Cf~ 16 ~8 ~ /f7I-~ · (j/1tI/9
M2i~ fDr f\OV\ I Z 959() Shore'Ref. G/7C/-/PCI'8 i- 1/;~
~ ~\f{(D:l LV\. 47LJ-~'6"CV{~
D\ \ , l\ 4
)..Cf<;'8'o Glen Rd '11 ~ -530 '7 9~/5.
.s;:~t ~~ )h1{OSh~~(h.b;D;;Lf10-~f~i1 '
C ~ lit\ ~ t.J\ CC&.0-y ~~ 34oShDn:w c>o~ O,^'(s~i.\'<.-1'
C~~:~ Q~::~~~:~;; !~~\YJY7Dg(~~"
f'/l~ B~ 'l~ 2-(0$05 Otl~ LUtf \(. ~. .
O~tlr.d >d.D1AO- 0 bA~ 2\.Z-lc;\' e-.,.'1 ~j.~1Y7l1 o. 'to\~(NS-3~ ~
l. \ . t - .. It t . )~ c"
c
Zeke-' ZU{/V1 haLh
,
· CHILDREN'S PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS t\.
We the undersigned children of Shorewood residents support the construction of an
off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County Road 19 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends, Scout
and Campfire activities at school, activities at the playground I ballfields after school, the
Hennepin Regional T..ra. iI;or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such a trail will
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life. .
Name
Aqe (optional) Address Phone (oDtional) Date
_955/BrInMcf/,0r,1wf4v~ i'i!;'/-i 9-1'-9
L ". . ...... · .'/ "
II
If
Weth~~~~i~~;~:~ O~:~~d~~~PP~~=~~~~~tS/'
off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County Road 19t() the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe When riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends, . Scout
' and ca.mPfire activities. at school, activities at th. e playground I ballfl.eldS after SChOOI,th. e.G.............."..
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and eX!lrcis!l. We, beli!lVe such a tr'lIlIwll ,,'
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of fife. 1
, . .- . .
Name
PA
Date
,a.lz '/'iP
· CHILDREN'S PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS 1
We the undersigned children of Shorewood residents support the construction of an
off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County Road 19 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends, Scout
and Campfire activities at school, activities at the playground I ballfields after school, the
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such a trail will
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life.
Name Aqe (optional) Address
)e55icO-..~'ttJ,(61-<\ Sb~O ChHS\dP~r
~Q.~ 2er~1 3 , 5680 ~hnS+oph,r ~
Li'lclsLY ~h~ .3 5'/.10 ChridoiAcrRd..
...12ttu L. r i ~('_L i (} . 7- !:>~ ~ 3r.AJ..LA s:rn?1J-&t
_c..;. ---..--:>
-dJ
II
l3"r~k tvu. L+~
I )
I I
J )
Phone (optional)
470-'t8-sE
~1(J'-~31~
4-7l/- ~LJJ-Y
II
Date
9/;/p19~
'1 )lfc!<1fc
,1'111{C
0, ))f' Aft
I '
'fIn -03
I J
}j
CHILDREN'S PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS (0
We the undersigned children of Shorewood residents support the construction of an
off-street hiking and biking trail along Smithtown Road from County Road 1.9 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends,. Scout
and Campfire activities. at school, activities at the playground I ballfields after school, the
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such a trail will
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life.
AQe (optional)
~ D'f\
/(J
Address Phone (ODtionaO
9 n. · :;-t.f,)) ~rau;t '-oY'en c. · ~
Date
I"
/ I /L r"
Cc (c t"C-...
~
,;;l~~/~
Bjf:a..e /u-ff'
S-7"i/r
\ t M S4;lo5
~ Sc.~~'\ -1-T 7
C ran+- ~IY2.. .~6
'v
- CHILDREN'S PETITION FOR SAFE STREETS q
We the undersigned children of Shorewood residents support the construction of an
off-street ~iking and biking trail along Smitht~wn Road from County Road 19 to the City of
Victoria border. We want to be safe when riding bikes or walking to: visit our friends,. Scout
and Campfire activities at school, activities at the playground J ballfields after school, the
Hennepin Regional Trail, or just getting fresh air and exercise. We believe such a traUwill
greatly benefit our community and enhance our quality of life.
Name
Aqe (optional)
Address
Phone (optional)
Ea.m ~.
r'//V'- Ax.d9>~A)
fJSId)5~. 41D.::lc2J03
~2.0SI'-\\}rJo.J,,&t \1)c(-L4 0'2-0
~~n~fPi\;)~~ 'f\'~f
~ pJ~
'6: 5
25'lX'i t>?J1 flT~~IfN--~tf
~tUL:; <HJ/7J#ZJAJ/fI./lL) ~1'/.-9f;2EJ
~
~
9;2~