021296 CC Reg AgP
.;W
\.;
C:I'l'Y COUHC:IL. RBGl7LAJt 1IBB'l':IHG
C:I'l'Y OJ' SBORBWOOD
JlONDAY, DBRUAllY 12, 1996
5755 COUH'l'RY CLUB ROAD
COURC:IL CBAJlBBRS
7:30 P.JI.
AGBRDA
1. CORVBD C:In COURC:IL JlBB'l':IHG
A. Roll Call
Mayor Bean
Stover
Benson
Mal~
McCarty
B. Review Agenda
C. Presentation of Plaque to Dean Young
D. proclamation - We Love Our Kids
2 . APPROVAL OJ' IIIW'l'BS
City Council Executive Session and Regular Meeting
Minutes January 8, 1996 (Att.-#2 Minutes)
3. CORSBR'l' AGDfDA - Motion to approve it... on
Consent Agenda &: Ad.opt Resolutions 'l'herein:
A. A Motion Establishing a Date for Public Hearing on
CDBG Funds
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing an
Arbor Day Celebration (Att.-#3B Proposed
Resolution)
C. A Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Adopting 1992 State
Building Code (Att.-#3C Proposed Ordinance)
D. A Motion to Extend the Deadline for Filing the
Final Plan of Ledin/Wartman/Minnewashta P.U.D.
(Att.-#3D Letter of Request)
E. A Motion to Establish the Spring Clean Up Date as
May 18, 1996
F. A Motion to Approve Permanent Appointment -Becky
Tarvin, Part Time Clerical Assistant
4 . 1IA'l''l'BRS I'ROII UJ: FLOOR (Presentation. are limited
to 3 minutes. Ho Council action will be taken.)
5. PARltS - Report by Repre.entative
A. Report on January 23, 1996 Meeting
~~.
..
C:I'l'Y COUIIC:IL AGBRJ)A - OBRUARY 12,
PAGB 2 01' 2
1996
B. Presentation by Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association
Representative on Ice Sheet Proposal at Freeman
Park
C. Consideration of a Motion Authorizing Minnetonka
Youth Hockey Association to Apply for Conditional
Use Permit for Shelter at Freeman Park and Waive
Associated Fees
6 . PLANII:IHG - R.port by R.pr....Dtati va
7 . SHOWIIOB:ILB '1'ASK I'ORCB - R.port by R.pr..entativ..
8 . COHS:IDBRA'1':IOH 01' A 1I0'1'IOR '1'0 ADOPT All' ORDDIIM'CB
A.II:&:JIDJIBJl AHD St1IIIIAItY '1'0 SBC'1':IOR 1300 -II01IJ:CIlt.u.
I'BBS (Att.-#8 Proposed Ordinance)
9 . COHS:ID1t:RA'1':IOH 01' A 1I0'1':IOH '1'0 ADOP'1' All' ORDDlUtCB
AllDtDIRG SBCIJ'IOR 902 - USB 01' RBC1l:&:A'1'IOIIAL
I'AC:IL:I'1':IBS BY A'1'BLB'1'J:C ASSOCJ:A'1'J:ORS (At t . - # 9
Proposed Ordinance)
10. COHSJ::DBRA'1'J:OR 01' A 1I0'1'J:OH D:IUC'1':IHG S'1'AIT '1'0
Bt1DGB'1' MODY :IN 1997 AHD 1998 I'OR GOOSB COIft'ltOL
BI'I'OR'1'S (Att.-#lO Memorandum from LMCD)
11. ADMIRIS'1'RA'1'OR &: S'1'AI'I' UPOR'!'S
A. Engineer's Report on Holly Lane Drainage Issue
B. Review Policy - Fire Department Response to CO
Alarm Calls (Att.-#llB Letter from Excelsior)
C. Engineer's Report on Agreement for Water Services
with the City of Victoria (Att.-#llC Engineer's
Memorandum)
D. Discussion on the Friends of the Southshore Senior
Community Center Proposed Regulations (Att.-#llD
Proposed Draft)
E. Report on LMCD's Special Event Permit Process
(Att.-#llE Letter from LMCD)
12. KAYOR &: C:I'l'Y COtJJllCJ:L RBPOR'1'S
13. ADJOt1RH St1BJBC'1' '1'0 APPROVAL 01' CLAJ:IIS (A t t . - # 13 )
.....
#'> '
~\~.,;
A.
:. -
~ ~
. '
. ,
".-:f.
!f:t
e.
MAYOR
Robert Bean
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Bruce Benson
Jennifer McCarty
Doug Malam
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612)474.3236
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
. SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12,1996
Crrf
"
A~enda Item #IC: Dean Young who retired from service with the Shorewood Liquor Store at the
end of 1995 will be here for a presentation of a plaque.
A~enda Item #10: "Our Community, Our Youth" program which is coordinated out of the
Minnetonka School District has requested the City Council to proclaim the month of February as
"Shorewood Loves Its Kids" month. The proclamation should be read and signed by the Mayor.
A~enda Item #3A: This motion is to establish a time and date for the Community Development
Block Grant program public hearing. We suggest 8:00 p.m., March 11, 1996.
A~enda Item #3B: This resolution officially designates Saturday, April 27, 1996 as Arbor Day and
the month of Mayas Arbor month in Shorewood.
Agenda Item #3C: The last time the State Building Code was updated was in 1990. The ordinance
in your packet brings us up to date with the state. If there are any questions relative to this matter,
please table it until the 20 February meeting.
A~en~ Item #30: Lundgren Bros. has requested that the deadline for submitting a fmal plan for
their LedinlWartmanlMinnewashta P.D.D. be extended for one year. Since the Zoning Code limits
the number and length of such extensions to one, six month extension, that is what the Planning
Director recommends.
A~enda Item #3E: This motion establishes May 18 as the annual Spring Clean Up Day.
A~enda Item #3F: The City Council takes official action making permanent appointments. It is
recommended that Becky Tarvin be appointed a permanent, part-time clerical assistant.
Agenda Item #5A: Bill Colopoulos is scheduled to report on the last Park Commission meeting.
A~en~ Item #5B: Bill will give a presentation on a refrigerated, covered hockey rink as proposed
by the Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association for Freeman Park.
A~enda Item #5C: The Park Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council
approve the Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association applying for a conditional use permit for the
proposed refrigerated, hockey rink in Freeman Park (City owned land). In addition, they are
_ ___. _~~ql!~~!!~g_ !h.:~. .<:;~~c}! _t~._~~'V~ _~~~i~t.e~ .~e_~s.. _ _,._. ___ _ . _. _ ... ..._.......__._..._..___ ____. . ..__ __. m: .m
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
Executive Summary - City Council Meeting February 12, 1996
Page 2
Agenda Item #7: Co-chairs of the Snowmobile Task Force, Virginia Kolstad of the Planning
Commission and Bill Colopoulos of the Park Commission, will be present to report on the status
of the work of the Snowmobile Task Force.
Agenda Item #8: This is an ordinance amending the various fees and charges. The items
recommended to be changed are underlined and crossed out. Please review the memorandum in
the packet regarding park dedication fees. The recommendation is to increase the fee for 1996
from $750 to $875. The rationale for this increase is explained in the memorandum.
Agenda Item #9: This proposed ordinance clarifies that the park fees. which are listed in the
ordinance considered in Item #8. are not charged specifically to sports and non-profit organizations
in the Minnetonka School District, but rather such groups may be asked by the Park Commission
to donate an appropriate amount to compensate for their exclusive use of the recreational facilities.
This ordinance simply clears up policy which has been effect for several years.
Agenda Item #10: The letter from Alan Willcut of the LMCD in the packet requests that the City
budget $1,000 in 1997 and 1998 for a proposed goose control program. If the Council should .
wish to do so, a motion would be in order to direct staff to place this item in each of those budgets. .
Agenda Item #11A: The City Engineer has a brief report on a project near Holly Lane requested by
the City of Chanhassen.
Agenda Item #IIB: This will be a report and discussion on the problem of additional emergency
call-outs of the Excelsior Fire Department due to carbon monoxide alarms. We should be
encouraging our residents if an alarm goes off to immediately check to be sure that everyone in the
house is safe, then open windows and call the gas company.
Agenda Item #11 C: The City Engineer will give an update on discussions with the City of Victoria
on the potential of the City of Shorewood providing water to the north end of Victoria
Agenda Item #110: Enclosed is a copy of the draft Senior Community Center regulations which
were sent to the Deephaven Mayor and City Council. It is hoped that they will review and approve
them the evening of February 15. The Shorewood City Council has not asked to review and .
approve them. This is included in your packet just as information.
Agenda Item #IIE: This will be a discussion on the LMCD's special event permitting process.
Material is enclosed in the packet for your review before the meeting.
~......................
..........-;-...''''-'. ....~..._....._..--_..
We Love Our Kids
Hennepin County Library has joined
with 21 Twin Cities communities in
We Love Our Kids,
a celebration of
community to cre-
ate and strengthen
healthy families
and children.
turn their completed posters by
Thursday, Feb. 29.
The initiatives are
based on Search InstitUte's research.
which names 40 assets that enable
young people to succeed. Assets in-
clude involvement of parents and
caring adults, participation in extra-
curricular activities, acquisition of
skills for decision making. and read-
ing for pleasure.
Throughout Febru-
ary, sponsoring
organizations, in-
cluding Hennepin
County Library, \\'ill
offer special acth'i-
ties and events for
children and fami-
lies. The regional
kickoff event will be
on Sunday, Feb. 4, :?
from 2-4:30 p.m. at
the Minnetonka
Community Center,
14600 Minnetonka Boule\'ard.
During February, Hennepin County
Library invites children to create post-
ers that show what they love to do at
the library. Children may pick up
poster paper at their local library be-
ginning Thursday, Feb. 15, and re-
Posters will be dis-
played at the librar-
ies during March
and April and se-
lected art will be
published in the
April edition of
Events & Issues.
Binding these com-
munities are initia-
tives that call for in-
dividuals, families
and organizations
to provide young
people the guid-
ance, support and
attention they need.
Please Take Note: Avoid a Fine Surprise
New fme rates take effect Feb.!. 1996 previous maximum fine was $750 an
on overdue adult materials. On .. item per loan period.
overdue adult print materials. the ...
fine rate is $.30 a day per item, . Patrons can avoid a fine by
an increase of a nickel. The' returning materials on time.
maximum fme for overdue adult . _ .. Also. they can extend the loan
print and audio\'isual material goes to period on most materials in any of
$12 an item per loan period or 75 three ways-in person at the checkout.
percent of the actual cost of the item by telephone. or by dO-it-yourself
per loan peribd. whichever is less. The online renewal.
1;:...' . ,'\\:
.c '...:
;i ,.;i
Your County
Commissioners
Love Kids, Too
10 recognition of the importance of li-
braries to children and youth, the
Hennepin County Board of Commis-
sioners spearheaded an effort to add
$300.000 to the library's budget to per-
mit the library to dramatically increase
its collection of books for children and
youth and on family and parenting is-
sues. This initiative is part of a $1.1
million (or 34 percent) overall increase
in the library system's budget for books
and other library materials approved
by the Commissioners.
Hennepin County Library's 1996 bud-
get of $4.4 million for Iibral1' materials
will allo\\.' the library to better keep
pace with record levels of usage by resi-
dents as well as spiraling increases in
publishing prices.
Librarv Board President Patti Baskin
says, "The Commissioners' vote of con-
fidence in the importance of the library
to the community is especially signifi-
cant in light of the tough fiscal realities
faced by local government today."
Adds Library Director Charles Brown,
"The infusion of new funds in 1996 will
help to ensure that the Library retains
its position as one of the community's
most magical and yaluable places for
children of ail ages..
Look inside for...
· Books Too Good To Miss
.Online Catalog .\"ews
· Science Adventures
A library, with its open doors and books freely available to all, is a symbol of what a perfect world might be.
-Barbara Kinpolver
]T:.
CD
cr
..
c
a
..
-<
...
-0
~
0-
.
.
.. _ '"
I d /f'/
Ii · LJ
. t L I ::f f :'
\ .' ~ f /....:.: /. ~.! :{-
\ I ;,;L I '/' II ./;1 .
i . 1; I, ..'; !: I t' I ,~
-\i : Ii! if 111)1 ijJ
, ~ I; i [.f - t V.V ,. i i
etoiiKa
memo
.
A Newsletter from the City ofMinnetonka
February 1996
It's .~'We Love 'Our' Kids" Month
'fHE MONTH Of FEBRUARY has been designated' by the Minnetonka City
Council as "We Love Our Kids" month. Begun'ten years ago in Eden
. . Prairie. the program promotes positive development in teday's youth. .
Minneionka's Recreation Services Depamnent. in keeping with the
program's theme. has planned a speciaf day of activities for Sun., Feb. 18.
Families are encouraged to attend these free events.
Minneto~ka Community Center Williston Center .
1 p.m.-S p.m. 1 p.~-S p.m.
Zoo Mobile. Kids' Jugglers. K-9 Basketball Hoop Shoot, Free Open
Demonstration. Bingo, Safety Officer Swim. Family Exercise Oass.
Kent Mason, Mini Golf. Wonder Batting Cage
. Weavers Storytellers, Mother Goose Minnetonka Ice Arena
and her Story Tales. . 3 p.m.-4:30 p.m.
Free hot chocolate will be available' Free Open Skating
throughout the aftemOOlL
Participants are encouraged to bring canned food goods to help restock area food
.lves. Accommodations for people with disabilities will be available_Please call
-4776 if you need special assistance. .
For specific times for the above events. please call 939-8203. 0 .
~ Youth Awards
'to be presented .
IN CONJUNCT10~ WITH "We Love Our
Kids" month. the cities of Golden
Valley. Hopkins and Minnetonka. as
well as the Hopkins and Mmrtetonka .
School DistriCts. are co-sponsoring an
event to honor young people who have
given outstanding service to others.
Several Caring Youth Awards will be
presented on Thur., Feb. 15. 7 p.m., at
the Minnetonka Community Center.
Tbe public is invited to this event. 0
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 1995
CONFERENCE ROOM
EXECUTIVE SESSION
7:00 PM
MINUTES
EX;ECVTIVE SESSION
1. Mayor Bean opened the meeting at 7: 10 p.m.
Present: Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, McCarty and Malam
Absent: Councilmember Stover
The Council discussed on-going litigation with Ron Johnson.
2. ADJOURN
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
James C. Hurm,
City Administrator
ATTEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
"">j
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDA Y, JANUARY 22, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Bean called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, Malam, and McCarty; City
Engineer Brown, City Administrator Hurm, City Attorney Keane, and
Planning Director Nielsen.
Councilmember Stover.
Absent:
B. Review Agenda
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to approve the agenda for January 22,
1996 as amended by removing Item 3H from the consent agenda to a
discussion item. Motion passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Executive Session, Regular and Work Session Meeting
Minutes -January 8, 1996
Malam moved, McCarty seconded to approve the City Council Executive
Session Meeting Minutes of January 8, 1996 as presented. Motion passed
3 ayes I 1 abstention (Councilmember Benson abstained as he was not
present at the January 8, 1996 meeting).
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to approve the City Council Regular
Meeting Minutes of January 8, 1996 as amended on Page 5, Paragraph 8,
Line 2 replace "develop" with "development"; on Page 6, Paragraph 8, Line
1 and 4 replace "vertical" with "horizontal"; on Page 6, Paragraph 10, Line
1 after "fixture" insert "on the cul-de-sac"; on Page 7, Paragraph 3, Line 1
replace "Herbes" with "Herbst"; on Page 7, Paragraph 8, Line 3 after
"trees" insert "in between"; and Page 8, Paragraph 9, Line 3 replace "a"
with "at". Motion passed 3 ayes / 1 abstention (Councilmember Benson
abstained as he was not present at the January 8, 1996 meeting).
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to approve the City Council Work
Session Meeting Minutes of January 8, 1996 as presented. Motion passed
3 ayes / 1 abstention (Councilmember Benson abstained as he was not
present at the January 8, 1996 meeting).
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Bean read the Consent Agenda for January 22, 1996.
:IF~
;f- ~
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 2
Malam moved, Benson seconded to approve the Motions on the Consent
Agenda and to adopt the Resolutions therein:
A. Motion to Reschedule the February 26, 1996 City Council Meeting to
February 20, 1996 at 7:45 p.m.
B. Motion to Reset a Public Hearing Date to Consider Vacation 0 f
Drainage and Utility Easement in Boulder Ridge to February 20,
1996 at 8:00 p.m.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-07. "A Resolution Approving 1996 Licenses
for Garbage Hauler and Tree Trimmer."
D. Motion to Approve the Annual Half-Marathon Easy Race to Traverse
the City for Sunday, May 5, 1996.
E.
Motion to Approve the City Administrator's Employment Agreement.
.
F. RESOLUTION NO. 96-08, "A Resolution Commending Public
Works Employee Jeffrey Jensen and Authorizing Accelerated Pay
Step Increases."
G. RESOLUTION NO. 96-09, "A Resolution of Merit for Don ZdrazU."
Motion passed 4/0.
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None.
3 H. Consideration of a Motion Making an Appointment to the Park Commission
Councilmember McCarty stated the City Council had interviewed two people for the
opening on the Park Commission and either one of the applicants would be a fantastic
addition. She stated she felt that Ken Dallman, Commander and President of the American
Legion, could bring a different perspective to the Commission as he has grown children. .
Many of the Commissioners are parents of younger children and it would be helpful to
obtain the viewpoint of the "adult-only" group.
Mayor Bean stated he agreed with Counci1member McCarty and saw this as an opportunity
to diversify the perspective of the Park Commission. He also encouraged the other
applicant, Kerry Mullen, to maintain an interest and possibly pursue some other
involvement with the City.
Councilmember Malam stated he agreed that both applicants were great and asked Kerry
Mullen to please stay involved.
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 96-10, "A
Resolution Appointing Ken Dallman to the Park Commission for a Three
Year Term Through the Year of 1998" and appointing Roxanne Martin as
Chairperson and Bill Colopoulos as Vice Chairperson of the Park
Commission for the year of 1996. Motion passed 4/0.
..
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 3
5. PLANNING - Report by Representative
Nielsen explained there was no report as the January 16, 1996 meeting of the Planning
Commission was a joint meeting with the City Council.
A. Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Setback Variance for Karla Peterson.
Applicant: Karla Peterson. Location: 21095 Forest Drive.
Nielsen reported Karla Peterson owns the property located at 21095 Forest Drive and is
requesting approval of a setback variance to construct an enclosed wheelchair ramp to
connect the existing home to the existing garage. The existing garage is located entirely
within the rear yard setback area and the proposed ramp will encroach 30 feet into the rear
yard setback. Nielsen noted the site is located in the R-1D, Single-Family Residential
District. The property contains approximately 31,097 square feet of area and is occupied
by numerous mature hardwood trees. One rationale for approving the variance is that to
move the existing garage to the buildable area of the lot would result in numerous trees
having to be removed. The Planning Commission requested a landscape plan be provided
and the applicant has done so. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending
approval of the variance with some additional trees to be located on the east side of the
structure to soften the view from adjoining properties and a letter of credit or cash escrow
to ensure the landscaping is completed by July 1, 1996.
Bill Strong, Sawhorse Designers I Builders, stated the applicant had to have the ramp. He
showed the Councilmembers a drawing of the site illustrating where the trees were to be
planted. He stated Ms. Peterson intends to do the required landscaping but asks for
leniency on the issue of having to put into escrow an amount of 150% of the cost of
landscaping. He stated he felt due to the abundant trees on the property already, there was
little if any landscaping which needed to be done to screen the structure. He noted the
applicant was willing to do the landscaping but due to the immense amount of money put
into remodeling and landscaping, he felt it would be redundant to have to put an amount of
150% the cost of landscaping into escrow for something they were doing anyway. He
stated the applicant had a tentative verbal agreement with a contractor to do the landscaping.
He believed the work was guaranteed for five years. He stated he did not feel a cash
escrow for 150% of the cost of landscaping or a letter of credit was necessary. He noted
he had spoke with two banks who had indicated they would not give a letter of credit.
Mayor Bean asked what the estimated cost of the landscaping was. Nielsen stated it was
approximately $1,200.00.
Mr. Strong stated the $1,200.00 was for three white pines. He noted Nielsen has
requested an additional white pine and the landscape contractor has stated he doesn't know
where he can locate another tree without possibly damaging the existing trees.
Nielsen noted the $1,200.00 estimate includes the three white pines but does not include
the additional pine and foundation plantings.
Susan Hagel, 21095 Forest Drive, noted they intend to complete the foundation plantings
themselves. She stated they could however, sign a contract for the company to do all the
landscaping.
...
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 . PAGE 4
Nielsen stated the City was not asking that one person do all the work but the escrow
amount has to cover the entire landscaping plan to ensure that the work is completed.
Mayor Bean asked if the staff could route Mr. Strong to a bank which will give a letter of
credit. Nielsen stated staff could do so.
Mr. Strong stated the applicant needed to receive approval to go forward tonight. Ms.
Peterson has sold her house, is closing and planning to move into the property at 21095
Forest Drive on January 29, 1996. She cannot move in without the ramp.
Councilmember Malam asked if Sawhorse has any bonding available.
Mr. Strong stated he could talk to the owner to see if Sawhorse would be willing to provide
a letter of guarantee. Nielsen indicated the City tries to avoid this type of situation due to
the legal risks.
Mr. Strong stated he felt Sawhorse would provide a letter of credit because of the good .
understanding between client and contractor. He stated the applicant intends to move into
the house for the rest of her life and the house has been in the family for 60-70 years.
Councilmember Malam stated he understood the difficulties but the ordinance is in place
and the Council has to be consistent. Councilmember McCarty stated the Council does
have to be consistent but does not want to deny someone access to their house.
Councilmember Benson stated the applicant has been trying to obtain this variance since
November. He felt in some ways the City had imposed this difficulty by not having
meetings, etc.
Nielsen noted one option available was to withhold the certificate of occupancy. This
option would not be applicable in this situation. Nielsen then suggested obtaining a waiver
of assessment. If the work is not completed by July 1, 1996, the City will complete the
work and assess the cost to the property. If the work is completed the assessment will be
removed and not certified in 1996.
.
City Attorney Keane stated if the work is not completed by July 1, 1996, the City has the
authorization to assess the cost of the work with a waiver of the right to appeal and the right
to enter the property and do the work.
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO 96-11. "A
Resolution Granting a Setback Variance to Karla Peterson, 21095 Forest
Drive," and direct staff to prepare a waiver of assessment and a right to
enter property if the landscaping is not completed by July 1, 1996. Motion
passed 4/0.
B. Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Concept Plan for Water's Edge
Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Bill Blegen. Location: 20295 Manor
Road.
Nielsen reported the resolution includes all the conditions set forth in the previous staff
report. The property will be divided into four lots, platting Lots 1 and 2 at this time and
leaving Lot 3 and 4 as a single lot. The resolution includes conservation easements to
,
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 5
protect sensitive portions of the site from development and construction, plans for access to
the sites, requirement of a tree preservation and reforestation plan, water assessments,
wetland conservation easements and protective covenants. The planned unit development
process will enhance the protection of the wetland portions of the site near Footprint Lake
and the steep wooded topography on the south edge of the property.
Malam moved, McCarty seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 9(i-17. "A
Resolution Approving the Concept Plan for Water's Edge Planned Unit
Development, Bill Blegen, 20295 Manor Road." Motion passed 4/0.
C. Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Final Plat - Zachary Woods. Applicant:
Brent Sinn. Location: 6035 Galpin Lake Road.
Nielsen reported Brent Sinn owns the property located at 6035 Galpin Lake Road which
also has frontage on the private road Galpin Lane. Mr. Sinn has been unable to obtain
easement to the private road and has changed his plat from four to three lots. A large lot
remains which is capable of being further subdivided. The subdivision could happen in a
number of different ways. Mr. Sinn or a future owner may be able to negotiate an
easement and could come back and request the same variance, a City street could be built
off Galpin Lake Road, or access could be provided by the parcel to the east. Staff is
suggesting the development stage plan include a declaration of covenant to advise any
future owner that the larger lot cannot be subdivided unless the new lots have frontage on a
public street. The development will be subject to the City's water policy. Water is not
currently available to the site. Two lots will be subject to a trunk charge and will be subject
to the water assessment when water is available. Nielsen indicated. staff is recommending
approval of the final plat subject to staff recommendations.
Brent Sinn, 6035 Galpin Lake Road, stated' this situation has occurred because he was
unable to obtain an easement from the Galpin Lane Homeowner's Association. He stated
he had originally agreed to a declaration of covenant stating that the parcel could not be
developed without access because the land would have been landlocked. The conditions
have since changed. He did not agree with including a stipulation that the property can
only be developed if a street was put in when the City Council had previously approved the
lot to exist without street frontage. He noted it would be difficult to subdivide and there
were only a couple ways to do so. He did not feel it was his obligation to notify future
property owners. The information should be available through the City. He noted in the
future someone may be successful in negotiations with the Galpin Lane Homeowner's
Association and they would then be forced to come to the City Council and ask to have the
declaration of covenant removed. He stated he was not asking for any special conditions.
All the lots have 100 feet of frontage and 20,000 square feet of area. He felt it was not his
responsibility to put people who purchase the parcel on notice of what they can or can't do.
Nielsen stated the development was really a disappointment from a planning standpoint.
Initially this was the ultimate development site. The frrst attempt at development had
required a significant amount of site alteration and the neighbors were not happy with the
layout. The next plan limited development, eliminated the necessity of a street going in and
bent the City's rule to allow a home on a private road. This was done to avoid significant
site alteration. As the plan stands now it is piece meal. If in fact the property is subdivided
in the future and a variance is requested the declaration of covenant can be removed at that
time. The declaration of covenant will not preclude subdivision of the property. The
purpose of the declaration of covenant is to make any future buyer aware of the situation.
...
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 6
Mr. Sinn stated he felt it was misleading to include the declaration of covenant when a
variance was already approved.
Councilmember Malam stated a future owner could come before the City Council and ask
to have the declaration of covenant changed. Mayor Bean asked why Mr. Sinn did not
want this information disclosed to a future buyer.
Mr. Sinn stated it gave a false pretense.
Councilmember Malam stated it was an accurate statement for where the City is at this time
with this piece of property.
Mr. Sinn asked the City Council to treat this parcel of property like any other parcel of
property. He stated if he decides to sell the property it will appear it can only be sub-
divided if there is proper street frontage. It gives the impression the only way to develop
the parcel is to install a cul-de-sac. .
Councilmember Malam stated he did not think this was a hindrance to the future sale of the
property. The declaration of covenant will not preclude a buyer from coming to the City
Council and requesting a variance. Nielsen noted Mr. Sinn can advise potential buyers that
a variance was approved by the City Council in 1995.
Mr. Sinn stated concern that it gives the impression that this is the only way the property
can be developed. He felt it would be twice as much work for an owner and the City
because it would require two actions and meetings. One meeting to remove the declaration
of covenant and one to approve the variance.
Mayor Bean stated the City has an opportunity to be sure a future owner will understand
the circumstances inherent to the property.
Malam moved, Benson seconded to adopt ~ESOLUTION NO. 96-13, "A
Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Zachary Woods, Brent Sinn, 6035
Galpin Lake Road" with the restrictive covenants as they are currently ..
written. Motion passed 4/0.
D. Consideration of a Proposed Amendment to the Seasons Declaration of Covenants
Keane noted the additions to this document included the Association being required to
distribute copies of all self-certification notices, policies and procedures, and any
amendments to these documents to the City of Shorewood and the inclusion of the
consensus of the mortgagee of interest at the time it was actually ftled and recorded.
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to approve the amendment to the
Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of (CIC No. 700)
the Seasons. Motion passed 4/0.
6. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION
MAKING CHANGES TO PERSONNEL POLICY WITH REGARD TO
SEVERANCE PAY
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 7
Huon noted this change will bring the policy regarding severance pay for all employees in
line with the contracts recently negotiated with AFSCME.
Mayor Bean read the resolution into the record.
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 96-14. "A
Resolution Making Changes to the Personnel Policy with Regard to
Severance Pay." Motion passed 4/0.
7. CONSIDERATION OF ARCmTECTURAL UPDATE AND
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES FOR SOUTHSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY CENTER
Brown explained on December 11, 1995, the City Council authorized the expenditure of
$8,715.00 to allow TSPIEOS to provide preliminary architectural services for the senior-
community center. This included the Concept Phase, Schematic Design Phase and Design
Development Phase. The architect has completed these phases and is requesting
authorization to proceed to 50% of the next phase, Construction Document Phase, for the
sum of $10,000.00. The temporary contract will allow TSPIEOS to proceed until February
14, 1996.
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to approve expenditures not to exceed
$10,000.00 for continuation of Architectural Services for the Senior-
Community Center City project 95-20. Motion passed 4/0.
8. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF BIDS FOR WATER TOWER
AND AWARD CONTRACT
Brown reported three bids for the construction of the Minnewashta School Water Tower
had been received on January 16, 1996. The low bid of $855,614.00 was received from
Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBI NaCon, Inc.). He noted OSM's estimated cost was
$830,000.00. Staff is recommending the tower control system be removed and completed
as a separate special item so staff can maintain close control. A contract for this will be
presented in March of 1996 and will cost approximately $20,000.00. Staff is
recommending approval of the bid from CBI Na-Con, Inc.
Mayor Bean asked if a performance guarantee was included in the contract. Brown stated a
liquidation of damages of $500.00 per day is included if the required timeframe is not met.
He stated the timeframe for this project increased the bids. Brown noted there was not a
final agreement between the City of Shorewood and the School District. The contractor has
stated the absolute last date he needs the contract to meet the completion date is February 1,
1996. The School Board will not be meeting until February 1st or 2nd. Brown stated he
felt the School Board would approve the agreement.
Huon suggested requesting the School Board have a special meeting to approve the
agreement.
Keane stated the issue the School Board was in disagreement with was relative to the
communication issue. He stated the City has accommodated most of their requests and he
felt the School Board would accept the agreement.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 8
Brown stated staff recommends that if the City Council award the bid, it should be subject
to the School District executing the agreement. Either the contractor has to be delayed or
the School Board will have to hold a special meeting. Hurm noted he would prefer the
School Board hold a special meeting.
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 96-15, "A
Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract for Minnewashta Elevated
Storage Tank, City Project 96-2 to CBI Na-Con, Inc in the Amount 0 f
$855,614.00" and authorize staff to proceed based on receipt of the
agreement executed by the School District. Motion passed 4/0.
9. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION
MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO FILL THE VACANCY ON THE
SNOWMOBILE TASK FORCE
Warren Peterson has indicated an interest in being appointed to the Snowmobile Task Force.
to fIll the vacancy due to Troy Stottler's resignation.
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 9~-16, "A
Resolution Appointing Warren Peterson to the Shorewood Snowmobile
Task Force, Representing Citizens at Large." Motion passed 4/0.
10. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1996-2000
A. Consideration of a Motion to Approve the 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Plan
Brown explained the items contained in the 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). These items included the Watermain Project Schedule, MSA Street Reconstruction,
Local Street Reconstruction, Stormwater Management, Sanitary Sewer System, Public
Facilities and Office Equipment, the Public Works Equipment Replacement Schedule, and
the Parks Project Schedule. Brown stated staff and the Planning Commission are
recommending approval of the 1996-2000 CIP.
Hurm noted staff intends to hold neighborhood meetings to explain the CIP in late
February and early March. The dates will be announced in the Shorewood newsletter.
Malam moved, McCarty seconded to approve the 1996-2000 Capital
Improvement Plan. Motion passed 4/0.
B . Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving the 1996 Capital Budget.
Malam moved, McCarty seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 96..17. "A
Resolution Approving the 1996 Capital Budget." Motion passed 4/0.
11. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS
.
B. Review of Mission Statement and City Values
Mayor Bean noted this document was written in 1992 and is revisited every year to re-
establish why the City Council, Administrator and employees are here and what they are
trying to accomplish. Mayor Bean read the Shorewood City Values and Mission Statement
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 .. PAGE 9
into the record. Counci1mem.bers reviewed and readopted the Values and Mission Statement
for the year of 1996.
A. Report on 1995 Objectives
Hurm noted there are two types of issues included in the 1995 Issues Prioritized and
Budget Objectives Report. One is the objectives specific to the 1995 adopted budget. The
second is issues identified by the City Council as important issues to address. The report
tells the City Council the progress they have made in meeting these objectives. There are a
number of objectives which were not met in 1995. These issues will be discussed in
February and used as a basis to establish objectives for 1996.
Mayor Bean noted some of the items included as objectives had been the Senior Center, the
Tree Preservation and Replacement Policy, City Street Policies, and the Watertower.
C. Report on Dry Hydrants on Islands
. Brown reported there are three dry hydrants installed near Enchanted Island. Last fall,
during a pump test, it was discovered that two of the three dry hydrants are not operating
properly. Staff has performed tests on the hydrants including vacuum testing and an
underwater exploration of two of the three hydrants. Brown stated it appears the problems
are due to the way the hydrants are designed and that the intake screens. on the two
malfunctioning hydrants are covered with sediment Staff will bring the City Council a
recommendation to resolve this problem in the Spring of the year once the ice is off the
lake.
.
Brown noted there had been a fire on the island and this raised considerable public concern.
The City of Mound Fire Chief, Mr. Steve Erickson, has assured staff that this problem will
not affect the response time of the Fire Department. Tanker trucks are on stand-by anytime
there is a fIre on the islands.
D. Report on Goose Control Meeting
Hurm reported on a meeting hosted by the City of Shorewood to discuss goose control.
John Parker from the DNR, Dr. James Cooper from the U of M and representatives of
different cities were in attendance. Both Mr. Parker and Dr. Cooper felt a joint goose
control effort would produce better results. Dr. Cooper estimates that in several decades
the goose population could be as high as ten times the current level. They encouraged cities
to consider applying for a LCMR (Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources) grant
to fund a cooperative goose control effort in the Lake Minnetonka area. It was noted that
local contributions by the cities involved would make obtaining the grant more likely.
There was Council consensus to participate in the cooperative effort on goose control.
Mayor Bean recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. and reconvened at 9:38 p.m.
E. Discussion on Highway 7 I Water Street Upgrade
Nielsen explained this upgrade was part of the 1987 Highway 7 Corridor Study. He stated
he had spoken with Carl Zieman at the public meeting held by MNDOT and he had sta~d
the City Council. of Excelsior did not object to the proposed change. Apparently, this
I>
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 - PAGE 10
opinion has changed. The City of Excelsior has expressed that they would support the
creation of a double left turn lane being created onto Highway 19. Nielsen stated he did not
know if MNDOT felt this was warranted and was not certain if there was enough right-of-
way to achieve a double left turn lane. This would also drastically change the cost of the
project.
Mayor Bean noted the City of Excelsior has expressed their concern that the proposed
changes to Water Street could significantly impact their downtown traffic.
Councilmember McCarty stated she did not feel the change would discourage people from
going to Excelsior. She noted that the Highway 19 and Water Street intersections were
very close to each other.
Mayor Bean stated he would like to support the City of Excelsior but was concerned given
the number of accidents at the Water Street intersection.
Councilmember McCarty noted the proposal was not to close off the Water Street .
intersection entirely but to create a right-inlright-out intersection.
Nielsen stated he would contact MNDOT and request their recommendation.
There was Council consensus to meet in a joint work session with the City of Excelsior and
MNDOT to discuss the proposed change.
F. Engineer's Report Regarding Water Assessment Charge
Brown reported staff felt it would be worthwhile to check into the price indexes to ensure
the City's rates are not out of line and that there is adequate funding to achieve the goals of
the ClP. Brown noted he will provide a report on the indexes at the next City Council
meeting.
Hurm reported he had received a letter from Peter McLaughlin, Chair of the Board of
Hennepin County Commissioners, reporting of two meetings. One meeting will be held at .
the Eden Prairie City Hall on January 31, 1996 from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. Mr.McLaughlin
would like to discuss the issue of housing with the different representatives of the different
communities. One of the recommendations for discussion is the Community Development
Block Grant program and different ways to utilize these funds. He noted other issues
which may be discussed include: what are the most pressing housing needs and issues
faced by suburban municipalities; and what housing role, if any would municipalities like
to see the County HRA play in order to better address housing issues and needs in
suburban Hennepin and to enable municipalities to achieve their goal in regard to the
Livable Communities Act. He encouraged any interested Councilmembers to attend.
12. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Malam stated he had submitted his letter of resignation effective February
23, 1996. He explained he has taken a new job which is located south of the river and is
moving to that area.
Councilmember McCarty stated this was a sad day for all and that it will be difficult to find
someone with the same dedication and insight as Councilmember Malam. She stated he
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 22, 1996 . PAGE 11
.
has a great perspective with a lot of heart. Councilmember Benson stated Councilmember
Malam would be missed by all.
Councilmember Malam thanked the Council for the opportunity to work with such good
people.
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to accept the letter of resignation from
Councilmember Douglas Malam effective February 23, 1996. Motion
passed 3 ayes / 1 abstention (Councilmember Malam abstained).
Mayor Bean noted the City Council will be seeking applicants to fill the Council vacancy.
This position will be subject to the November 1996 election.
Councilmember McCarty reported she was unable to attend the phosphorous meeting last
Wednesday.
Hurm reported the Lake Minnetonka area cities have submitted a preapplication to the
Board of Innovation and Cooperation requesting additional funding to help with area
cooperative efforts. He noted the request was considered by the Board to be below the cut-
off level. He reported the Lake Area Administrators will be meeting this Friday to discuss
this matter and make a decision on whether to develop the application further and resubmit
it.
Mayor Bean reported of an inquiry from "City Business", a local Twin Cities paper,
seeking nominations of people in the business community who are under 40 years of age
who have made a difference in the business community and the community at large.
13. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Benson moved, Malam seconded to adjourn the City Council meeting at
10:09 p.m., subject to approval of claims. Motion passed 4/0.
. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Lorri L. Kopischke, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
~
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
1996 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Notice is hereby given that the City of Shorewood in cooperation with Hennepin County
pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended,
is holding a public hearing on March 11, 1996 at 7:45 p.m. in the Shorewood Council
Chambers at 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, Minnesota.
The public hearing is on the housing and community development needs, priorities of the
City and Urban Hennepin County and the City's proposed use of the 1996 Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program proposed planning
allocation of $17,486.
In addition, during the July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997 program year, it is estimated that no
additional program income from locally funded CDBG activities will be available to the
City.
The City of Shorewood is proposing to undertake the following activities with 1996 Urban
Hennepin County CDBG funds starting on or about July 1, 1996.
Activity
Southshore Senior Center Operation
Housing Rehabilitation
Budlet
$ 3,497.00
13,989.00
For additional information on the priorities, proposed activities, level of funding and
program performance, contact the City of Shroewood at 474-3236 or the Hennepin County
Office of Planning and Development at 541-7080.
The public hearing is being held pursuant to MS 471.59.
To be published in the Sun/Sailor February 21, 1996.
#3A
IT?
~ SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
o:rn 10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone 541-1019 Fax 541-0841
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Daralyn Peifer
Pfflsidenr
February 7, 1994
Bob Zagaros
1st Vice President
Ryan Schroeder
2nd Vice President
Mayor Robert Bean and City Council Members
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
William H. Gray
Seaelary
Kevin Krueger
T fflssurer
Dear Mayor Bean and Council Members:
Tom neen
Past President
Senior Community Services is requesting $3,497 for the 1996-97
fiscal year from the City of Shorewood to support the programming
efforts of the Southshore Senior Center.
.
Marty Gurltz
Member-at-Large
Alko Higuchi
Member-at-Large
This request meets the new guidelines for distribution of
Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) funds as set forth
by HUn/Hennepin County.
Mary Anderson
Nelson Berg
John C. Boeder
Lucille Crow
Robert DeGhetto
Dwight Johnson
Tad Jude
John Keefe
John Nelson
Senator Gen Olson
Lawrence Schram
Because of Shorewood's support, your older residents are able to
benefit from services such as dining and transportation, that help
them remain independent and also adds to the quality of the older
adult's life.
Benjamin F. With hart
Ex9CUtiVe Director & C.E.O.
On behalf of Senior Community Services, an agency that works
with and for older adults, thank you for your past support and for
your continued support.
.
PROGRAMS
. H.O.M.E.
. MuRl-purpose
Senior Centers &
Community Groups
· Senior Outreach
· Seniors Serving
Business
.
A united ~
AgerKy
.,
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 96.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OBSERVANCE OF
ARBOR DAY TO BE APRIL 27, 1996 AND
ARBOR MONTH TO BE MAY, 1996
WHEREAS, trees use up excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and turn it into
life-giving oxygen; and
WHEREAS, trees help conserve energy; that is, three properly planted trees
around a home can cut air conditioning bills by ten to fifteen percent; and
WHEREAS, trees turn urban "heat islands" into cool and comfortable "oasis",
making the concrete jungle livable for all of us; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of Minnesota, has proclaimed Friday,
April 26, 1996 to be Arbor Day and the month of May, 1996 to be Arbor Month.
NOW, THERE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood City Council that the
citizens of Shorewood are encouraged to observe Saturday, April 27, 1996 as Arbor Day
and the month of May, 1996 to be Arbor Month by planting a tree and thereby hoping to
ensure a green Shorewood and Minnesota in decades to come.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota
this 12th day of February, 1996.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATIEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
.#-38
t.-.... .-
1001.01
1001.02
CHAPTER 1001
BUILDING CODE
SECTION:
1001.01:
1001.02:
1001.03:
1001.04:
State Building Code Adopted
Organization and Enforcement
Permits, Inspections and Fees
Violations
.
1001.01: STATE BUILDING CODE ADOPTED: The Minnesota State Building Code,
established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 16B.59 through 16B.73, one
copy of which is on fIle in the City offices, is hereby adopted as the Building Code for the City. Such
Code is hereby incorporated in this Chapter as completely as if set out in full.
1. Chapter 1300 - Minnesota Building Code
2. Chapter 1301 - Building Official Certification
3. Chapter 1302 - State Building Construction Approvals
4. Chapter 1305 - Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code including Appendix
Chapters:
a. 3, Division L Detention and Correctional Facilities
b. 12, Division IT, Sound Transmission Control
c. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures
5 . Chapter 1307 - Elevators and Related Devices
6. Chapter 1315 - Adoption of the 1993 NationalElectrical Code
7. Chapter 1325 - Solar Energy Systems
8. Chapter 1330 - Fallout Shelters
9. Chapter 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations
10. Chapter 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped
11. Chapter 1346 - Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code
12. Chapter 1350 - Manufactured Homes
13. Chapter 1360 - Prefabricated Buildings
14. Chapter 1365 - Snow Loads
15. Chapter 1370 - Storm Shelters
16. Chapter 4715 - Minnesota Plumbing Code
17. Chapter 7670 - Minnesota Energy Code
18. Chapter 1305.0020, Subpart 2 - 3, Division ill, 1992 One and Two Family Dwelling
Code; 15, Reroofmg; 33, Excavation and Grading
19. Chapter 1306 - Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8a (Group M, S, or F
occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet)
.
1001.02. ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCKMENT: The organization of the Building
Department and enforcement of the Code shall be as established by Chapter 1 of the
1994 Uniform Building Code. The Code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the City.
The Building Department shall be the Building Code Department of the City of Shorewood. The
Administrative Authority shall be a State certified "Building Official".
The Appointing Authority shall designate the Building Official for the jurisdiction of Shorewood.
?J,~
-. ...
.
.
1001.03 1001.04
1001.03: PERMITS, INSPECTIONS, AND SURCHARGE:
Subd. 1. Permits. Inspections. and Fees. Permits. inspections. and collection of fees shall be as
provided in Chapter 1 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. The amounts of the permit
fees for activities encompassed by the Code shall be as established by the City Council
from time to timel.
Subd. 2. Surcharge. In addition to the permit fee required by Subd. 1 above. the applicant shall pay
a surcharge to be remitted to the Minnesota Department of Administration as prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes section l6B.70.
1001.04:
VIOLA nONS: Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this
Chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. COrd. 229,8-13-90)
I See Section 1301.02 of this Code.
f-.
, MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
FROM:
DAlE:
RE:
Fll..E NO.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Sean
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Bruce Benson
Jennifer McCal1y
Doug Malam
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWQQD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236
Mayor and City CoUncil
Brad Nielsen
7 February 1996
LedinlWartmanlMinnewashta P.U.D. - Extension of Deadline to File Fmal
Plan
405 (94.05)
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
3,\)
..
J'AI'l 29'96 10:07AM Ll..tfDGREN 80S. COMST.
LUnD<iREn,
.
BROS.'
CONSTRucnON
, INC
mE. WayzaIa Blvd.
WayzaIa ,
Minnesota 55391
(612)473-1231
.
.'
January 29,1996
Mr. Brad Neilsen '
City P1aaner
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shotewood, MN 55331
VIA FAX
R;e: Prelimmary Plat Extension
Dear Brad;
On Au8ust 28, 1995, the Shorewood City Council approved thO Development '
Stage Plan for our LcdiDlWartmanlSchool site (ale.a. SmitbtoWn Properties
P.U.D.) Due to the slow economy and slow buildUm ~t activity in upper
braclcet homes, Lundgren Bros. Construction Co. inc. would Ijke an cx.tension of
this "prelimiDary pl~ until April 1, 1997.' Please consider this le~ our request
:tOr such an. extension.
Brad, I would ask that this matter be placed OD the i1e.xt' City Coancil agenda' and
hopefully ~ hmdled as a conscirt agenda matter. Plcssc inform me as tq the
status. Thank you.
"
Sincerely,
~'Bros'
, (}Jt.~':'" .
b :'MarC S. Anderson '
or'ofLand DeveloPment
00:' Teny Forboi'd '
Ken Adolf
, "
P .1/2
"
, ,
, '
, ,
"
'.
,
. .
.~.,
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
DRAFT
MINpTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
Vice-Chair William Colopoulos called the meeting to order at 7:35p.m.
2. ~O',J~ CALL
Present:
Vice-Chair Colopoulos; Commissioners Puzak, Wilson, Bensman and
Dallman; Administrator Hurm.; City Engineer Brown; Council Liaison
McCarty .
.
Absent:
Chair Martin; Commissioner Trettel
Also Present: Planning Commission Chair Deborah Borkon; Minnetonka Youth Hockey
Association Representatives
3. ORGANIZATIO~f\L MATrERS
.
A. Introduction of New Member - Newly appointed commissioner,
Kenneth Dallman, who will serve a three year tenn, was introduced by Vice-Chair,
William Colopoulos Jr. and welcomed by the Park Commission.
B. Establish City Council Liaison 1996 Schedule - A schedule of the
City Council Liaison positions was established for 1996 as follows:
February - Colopoulos June - Trettel October - Puzak
March - Bensman July - Wilson November - Dallman
April - Puzak August - Colopoulos December - Wilson
May - Dallman September - Bensman Substitute - Martin
Colopoulos moved to approve the schedule for the City Council Liaison for
1996 Park Commissioners as noted. Puzak seconded and the motion
carried unanimously .
4. REVIEW AGENDA
Administrator Hurm. requested on behalf of the Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association
(MYRA) that their presentation be placed further down on the agenda to 8:00 p.m. That
change was approved and there were no other changes to the agenda.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Colopoulos moved, Bensman seconded to approve the minutes of Tuesday,
November 28, 1995 as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Sit
r- '.~J
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y JANUARY 23, 1996
PAGE 2 of 5
6. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
There were none
7. PROPOSAL FQR FREEMAN ICE S;aEET FOR MYRA
Tabled until later in the evening. (See item after #9.)
8. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
A. Snowmobile Task Force - Colbpoulos reported that progress is being made in
two essential areas: Preparing for anticipated questions which will require answers
at the time of addressing the City Council, and establishing a subcommittee to
create the community survey which is set for a March mailing date. City Attorney .
Tim Keane has been included in this part of the process and will attend the next
meeting of the task force as well Also, there is a change in the roster of the task
force. Warren Peterson was appointed to replace Troy Stottler, who resigned due
to a job conflict. Colopoulos noted that this change does not seem to alter the
balance of viewpoints within the group.
B. Hockey Task Force - To be covered in the MYRA presentation (item#7).
C. Park Foundation Meeting Report - The January meeting of the Park
Foundation was postponed until February 15. A report will be included in the next
Park Commission meeting.
D. Silverwood Equipment Report - Commissioner Wilson had inspected the play
equipment at Silverwood in response to a concern raised during a previous meeting
that the slide was looking warped. He did not see a problem with any part of the
equipment except that one of the three play equipment pads appeared to be set
slightly lower than the others, which does not pose a structural problem. He did .
state that the two-year old equipment is showing dirt stains on the light colored
portions.
Wilson also added that he had received a call from a Silverwood area
resident who had several concerns such as tree trimming to excess, plowing beyond
the normal parking areas and heavy traffic on parkland by suspected youth. Hurm
diagrammed the area, explaining that the clearing of snow is for rink access and that
snow piles are placed to block unwanted traffic on the trail. A bollard is to be
installed in the necessary area in the spring. Engineer Larry Brown has also been in
contact with someone on these issues and stated that a letter to residents will be sent
soon to explain the. plans for the bollard and trial area. Wilson concluded by saying
that Silverwood is in good condition with no visible litter or damage at this time.
Private parties have provided lighting and a picnic table for the skating area.
9. REVIEW FEE SCHEDULE - P~RK DEDICATION F~ES
Because it has been over three years since there has been a change in Park Dedication Fees,
and, in light of the fact that there is a limit to the number of potential lots within the City of
.
.
+-
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y JANUARY 23, 1996
PAGE 3 of 5
Shorewood (approximately 200), it was suggested that the Park Commission consider a
recommendation to Council that the fees be increased. Although a copy of a metro area
report of fees was provided, it was difficult to determine how the present fee of $750
compares with other nearby cities.
In the course of discussion, the following points were made: The fee is charged to
the party who plats the land, but is ultimately passed on to the buyer of the home, as it is
considered a part of the property's cost. Park development does increase property value,
although the exact affect cannot be documented. The purpose of this revenue source is not
to develop additional parkland, but to complete and maintain existing facilities as is stated in
the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Bensman stated that it would be reasonable to
raise fees to reflect inflation and that it seems fair to be in keeping with the increased value
of the land. Commissioner Puzak asked about the preference to ask for a fee assessment
rather than to increase taxes to fund an established need for park expenses. Hurm replied
that the initial assessment is an established and accepted approach. plus an existing owner
would be paying twice if a tax were levied at this point. He also interjected that the City
Council did approve the CIP as recommended by the Park Commission, which includes an
undesignated fund balance in five years of $6,500 which estimates future park dedication
fees. This resource will decline with time.
Deborah Borkon asked from the floor about the options for generating revenue after
the last lot is sold. This is where the Park Foundation would be involved with fund raisers
to hopefully take over for park dedication fees Plus, the expense of park development
should be reduced as time goes on with maintenance being the main cost, rather than
development The other source of income is user fees and donations. There was further
discussion, concluding that although it is impossible to project needs or revenue beyond
five years, it is reasonable to implement an increase at this time and that it should be tied in
to some index.
Colopoulos moved that the Park Commission propose to increase the fee
proportional to the land price inOation factor from the last time it was
done... to the current adjustment period which should be... to January 1,
1996, thereafter to be adjusted on a calendar year basis. Bensman
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
7. PROPOSAL FOR FREEMAN ICE SHEET FOR MYHA (REVISITED)
John Flood, representing Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association, (MYHA) explained the
need for additional quality ice for an ever-growing number of players, introduced other
members of MYHA who were present, and stated that their proposal is to construct an
outdoor, refrigerated, canopied sheet of ice to be used mainly as a practice facility. They
are asking the Shorewood Park Commission to give a favorable recommendation to the
City Council that MYHA be able to build this arena at the north end of Freeman Park.
Ms. Gerry Graham then described the worsening situation with the shortage of ice
time and emphasized the importance of strong recreation programs to the community.
Mr. Jim Finstuen provided statistics to illustrate the rapid growth in the sport of
hockey and in the population in general. He also pointed out the issue of gender equality
which will require even more time as hockey grows as a girls sport.
Mr. Paul Hannan, architect and also a member of MYHA, showed a map of
Freeman Park with the proposed placement of the new facility and a sketch of the structure.
6f-- .,", ..:-
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y JANUARY 23, 1996
PAGE 40f 5
The 85'x200' refrigerated concrete surface would be covered by a lOO'x225' canopy,
supported by steel trusses. An auxiliary building would house mechanicaIs, zamboni
storage and concession space. During the "off season" (mid March to mid October) the
concession stand could be used for other activities at the park: and the concrete slab for a
picnic pavilion or in-line skating surface.
Mr. Jim Wyman presented information on the estimated cost of $650,000 and
various funding options. The projected revenue sources include ice rental (at a recom-
mended rate of $50Ihour) and concession sales. The figures and diagrams were given as
handouts and are kept on ftle in the packet notebook at City Hall.
John flood identified five issues to be detailed in a "Facility Use Agreement",
which will be drafted by and agreed to by both the City of Shorewood and The MYHA.
These have been discussed with city staff and will be clarified for City Council:
ownership, programmability, insurance, maintenance and concessions. He concluded with
a request that the Park: Commission advance the proposal to City Council for the next step .
and then invited questions from the park commissioners.
Puzak: said that he was impressed with the plan and liked the proposed location. He
asked about the refrigerant that will be used and requested that it be a non-toxic substance,
especially in view of the high water table in that area. He also stated a preference for a
wooden frame rather than the proposed metal for liability reasons as well as aesthetics.
John Flood replied that the choice of metal was a budgeting decision.
Other questions discussed were: availability for public use, rights to concession
revenues, school district property options, timeline for construction, budgeting for
landscaping, affect on rink time at neighborhood parks and use of Minnetonka Ice Arena.
The overall response was in favor of the proposal as a positive investment in the
community and not to waste any time, but to proceed with the recommendation to Council
and then continue to work on details.
10. DISCUSSION ON COMMEMORATIVE SIGNS
This item was tabled until the February meeting date.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDA Y JANUARY 23, 1996
PAGE 5 of 5
11. SET DATE TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL FOR OBSERVANCE
OF ARBOR DAY
As an applicant for recertification for Tree City USA, Shorewood needs to establish a date
for official recognition of Arbor Day. The national observance is set for April 26, 1996.
Colopoulos moved to recommend to City Council that the observation of
Arbor Day, the details of which will be determined at a later date, will take
place on Satur{lay, April 27, the day after Arbor Day 1996. The formula
for each year after will be to recommend to Council the Saturday following
Arbor Day as the day of observation. Jim Wilson seconded and the motion
passed unanimously.
.
12. ~
A. REVIEW 1995 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
One 1995 project that was delayed is the finishing of the parking lot at Cathcart
Park. Hurm explained the arrangement with the church to plow their lot in
exchange for use of it for park activities. This will be the last year that plan will be
in effect Other 1995 projects that will be carned over are the picnic pavilion and
water fountains at Freeman.
B. SCHEDULE FOR 1996
.
Hurm asked if the Commission would like to hire a park planner to review Freeman
Park plans before approving any additional improvements. Bensman agreed that with
the size and complexity of Freeman Park, it would be best to enlist a professional's
recommendation, especially with signage. Colopoulos added that it should be put on
hold until the entrance issue is resolved. It was also recommended that the Badger
play equipment wait until later in the year.
13.
ESTABLISH NEXT MEETING DATE
The next meeting date is scheduled for Tuesday, Febmary 27,1996 at 7:30 p.m.
14. AD.TOURNMENT
There being no further business, Colopoulos moved and Bensman seconded
to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously and the meeting was
adjourned at 9:52 p.m.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
Connie Bastyr
Park Secretary
..
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Action Committee
Objective: To request the Shorewood Park Commission 's recommendation to the Shorewood City
Council that the area adjacent to the Freeman Park Softball Fields be allocated/or an outdoor ice sheet.
I. Introduction by Ice Rink Action Committee Chairman - Mr. John Flood
n. The community perspective and influence - Ms. Geny Graham
. Ill. Statistics and trends reflecting growths and shortages of resources - Mr. Jim Finstuen
IV. A response to the problem: Construction of a refrigerated outdoor ice sheet - Mr. Paul Hannan
V. Viability of the project and request for approval from the Park Board - Mr. Jim Wyman
VI. Sketch
VII. Issues
.
vm. Questions and Answers
Date: 23 January 1996
myhaO l.doc
~~8
."t." ~
Page 1
23 Janwuy 1996
PRESENTATION
TO THE
.
SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION
.
By: Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Action Committee
myha02.doc
.,..
.
Page 2
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Action Committee
Objective: To request the Shorewood Park Commission's recommendation to the
Shorewood City Council that the area adjacent to the Freeman Park Softball Fields be
allocated for an outdoor ice sheet.
Identification of the problem:
. Y outhPopulation Increasing
. Demand for Ice Time Intensifies
. . Associated Costs Soaring
. Accessibility to Families is Decreasing
myha03.doc
..
Page 3
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Action Committee
Objective: . To request the Shorewood Park Commission's recommendation to the
Shorewood City Council that the area adjacent to the Freeman Park Softball Fields be
allocated for an outdoor ice sheet.
Sensible Immediate Response:
.
. Good, Reliable Outdoor Ice Surface
. Construct Adjacent to Softball Fields
. Refrigerated and Groomed
.
. Operational for 1995-1996 Season
myha04.doc
0
.....
'-
.....
-.J
'-
\D
0\
0
\D
..
e ~
~
Cfl
1-3
;J:i
1-3
H
0
~
Fundraising Campaign
MYHA: tee Rink-Aetion'
Hat Trick Gifts
Playmaker Gifts
All Star Gifts
Large Companies
Sm Businesses
Special Event(s)
Inkind Materials
or Services
Loan Financing
TOTAL:
$4,000+
N.' 25
$1,000-4,000 N- 70
$1-1,000 N-405
$2,000+
$100+
$20,000
$25,000
N- 65
N-100
~
.....
N
W
$144,000 ($60,000 expected annual revenue
from ice rental & concessions
will cover principal & interest
payments - 3-4 year payoff)
-
~
U1
0\
I
-.J
co
\D
o
$650,000
"tJ
.
o
o
0\
.
.
.
:
o
o
o
o
.
:::a
=
c:
.
-
-
n
.
ill
i
-
n
o
:s
a
..
CD
!
..
LOa . d
b
.
:I
"
s-
.
tt~
-~
.
...
A
.
~
en
:I
r
s-
a
CD
","
#Q
!
"U
CD
..
...
o
i
.i
..
o
~
"U
II
~
I
...
....Q
~,
..
.
i
~
1If'
i
I:
.i
:#<
n
..
N
Cl'l
~
;8
!P
.
a
--
w.e
#..
~
~
06SL-9S~(Etl:)
NO I J"fJ.S
S~:60
a:
-<
:r:
)>
."
nS
CD a.
::UDJ
-.
::s .-
~ --
)>CS
n
ctO
o m
:s 3
oi
o -.
3U2
3 ::s
-.
i
CD
.
..
.
96/L1/10
.
.
Page 7
Minnetonka youth Hockey Association - .Ice Rink Action Committee
Associated Financials:
Estimated Cost .............. .............. ............. ................ ................. S 650,000
Cash on Hand ....................................................................................................... S 15,000
501(c)3 Fund Drive (proposed) ............................................................................. S 506,000
Proposed Equity .... .............. ................................... .................. ............................. $ 521,000
Balance ...................................................................................... S 129,000
Additional Equity Sources:
* State of Minnesota Funds
* Corporate Tax Deductible Donations
* Individual Tax DeductIble Donations
* MYRA Fund Raising Activities
Revenue Sources:
1000 hours of ice @ SSO.OOIhour ............................................................................$ 50,000
Concessions ........................................................................................................ ...$ 10,000
Charitable Gambling ... ............. ............. ......... ......... ....... ............................. ........... $ 11, m
T ota1 .................................................................................................... ...... .......... ...$ 60,000
The $60,000 annual revenue budget will be utilized to pay for maintenance and proposed debt service.
myha07.doc
.,
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Action Committee
City of Shorewood
Cooperative Partnership Issues:
1. OwnershiD - Facility, Lease, Long-Term
2. Prof!rammabilitv - Purpose, Coordination
.
3. Insurance - Liability, Coverage
4. ODerations/Maintenance - Expertise, Staff Position
.
5. Concessions - Building, Multi-Purpose, Revenues
"Facility Use Agreement" - Details
17 Januaty 1996
myhalO.doc
..
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association - Ice Rink Committee
City Of Shorewood
Anytime there is a private - public partnership there are issues to be considered. The most
obvious concerns are as follows:
1. Ownership - After the facility is complet~ the MYHA will turnover the facility
to the City of Shorewood. The city wiIl then lease the facility back to the MYHA at a
nominaI rate over a long term. ( indefinite)
.
2. Programmability - The MYHA wiII have the ability to program the ice from
Oct 15th to March 1st Monday thru Friday 6-IOPM (3 useable hours) and Saturday &
Sunday 7am thru 12pm and 3pm -lOpm. The MYHA would also like to negotiate some
programmable hours from March 1 st to Oct 1 st mainly for in-line skating leagues that are
yet to be formed. The MYHA is very open to work with the City of Shorewood to make
sure this facility serves the needs of all parties involved.
3. Insurance - The City and the MYHA must each carry liability insurance
sufficient to cover each parties responsibilities..
4. Maintenance - This facility will require considerable operating expertise and
some maintenance during its peak use between Oct 15th thru March 1st. It seems that this
would require a full time staff position. Recognizing this, the MYHA would work with
the city by , if the budget allows, funding this staff position out of the facilities operating
budget.
.
5. Concessions - Included in the master plan for Freeman Park is a concession
stand. The MYHA would like to combine a warming house and storage garage in this
same building. It has been discussed that the city would loan the $50,000.00 that has been
budgeted for the concession stand to the MYHA for constructing this multi-purpose
building. Once the concession/storage building is complete, the MYHA would operate the
concession stand on a year round basis, as demand called for it. The profits from the
concessions would go to repay the debt on the facility.
These issues will be detailed in a "Facility Use Agreement" that will be drafted by and
agreed to by both the City of Shorewwod and The MYRA.
17 January 1996
myha09.doc
01/17/96 09:47 STATION
PIIC'
MiIUlCtoDlfa Youth Hockey AAsociatioa .IQe Riak Actioa Co,tnmiUcc
Com.qittee Data:
· Jo~ Flood.. 470-0917 (H), 337.3283 (W)
· ~es Bums - 473..2536 (H), 338-4722 (W)
· PaullHannan.. 934-9406 (H), 831-5926 (W)
· Jim Wyman - 470-0279 (H), 557.1278 (W)
· GeDlY Graham .. 470-4497 (H), 340.5432 (W)
· Todd Friesen. 470-5354 (H), 941-7333 x241 (W)
myha08.dtc
(123)456-7890
P. 009
"..
.
.
.
.
(12;") 4~b- HS~U
r. VLV
Page 9
MinnetonJca foutlJ Hockey Msociation - Ice Rink Adon cOJllldttee
Rererence.:
Be '. CU:.1..: How Urbc1n Parks Can Make Cities SaLe anel Healthy. The
Trust Lor Pub jc LcJnd, a94
=~gs m sewnIl U.S. dIia IIoamIenIfd ill this rqort shaw fIrM t:rimI4rops'" ~ FIts-
. IIdir1iIia ",., ~
"(1rj ldz:e.D'. ~.t::Loa .iDto spcu:b," by Vicki Novak Johnson, Helpolllene Journal,
Spring 1989, Yolo 8, No.2, pp. 23-26.
Cita :S' fly Dr. om G4IblMrd, dir<<IorofClrild ~t l..tIbortIIory, - Dr. Stew CrorM, 4irrdt1r of the
Physiol .."" CorulitimdallAbtn~ froth lit Taa A&M w#JidI identiJk4 $CWI'alIptdJk IwltIJ l1aeJUs
multing rtpkr physialllIdiT1ity for drildrtJI.
"Qi%u' ~U....: l'IG'a.:i.od kf:irity __ S'eJ.f'-.r.~," by Lynn Ja.ffee and R.macca
Manzer, ~ne Journal, Fall 1992, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 14-23.
SbMlyr$girIs in MiII~ P.4IgtS nine to 12. f11UM that gi'& who spent more time ~ Q7<<k
J1IIrlid , i. pltysicallldioity or sporb<<Orftl higher em a IdfestMa iadn. Girls 1I1Iw ~ m the
highest ofduitia . scoml higlat em II amjid."tt/~ huIn wIridI ".",1'f4 fuIht8s of
CfmIpderf" m~, math, Idcma _ Kbool in gmmd.
Cite lmI~ raetIJ'da by Womnt's Sporis fmmtl4tiorr; that f1II1Sity tlthlNs twt't mort likely t1uut ftOft..
tlthkta tol5CCft well em ~t tats, rqort lJigh papulllrity, 5tmJ ill high school, tItmUl Cf1l~ - _"
~lor"*gm.
Al&o ala lYouth Sports 11l5~ DfMichiga 5buly 0{10,(XJ(J, 10-18 ytllr o/b; ~fs Dfplrysiall tldWity fly both
~ -,;m fDtU imp' ootd sdJ-amfidencc tmcl.'fest<<m, tn1umatllll#rli~, emotiorullsttlhiUty,
m~ tmtlxlfccmlrol.
'"P.bp.i.c:&l. "'~ri.ty' aDd s.U'-.:.t_ .ilia ~: =- 1'''' re&J:.," by Lynn ,JaLfee and
Sherri lUcker, Melpomene Journal, Autumn 1993, Vol. 12, No.3, pp. 19-26.
ShuIy ofW girls in Mi~St. PtIUl, lip 12-11. ~ sf4tisliadly Jignifical nWimcsbip bdwmt the
,."mhr ofi~ Ildiviti5 ttIdJ pi "',." in, 'M ntmlber of times F" ~k . "'gaged hi the lldioit.y. tIJId.
ormall ~ IIIUl ~ ea iadcr ma&SJlring amjidetrce in ~'$ alnlity in sports, mtIlh. fdm<< tIIUl
Khool ill ,..,tIl).
"rAlkiag ~ 1d.t:Ia ~.o't& stat. Rep. Bob Ki.IlHu:t." MJ.nnesota ShotiC.1se Hockey
Magadne, Maz<ch 1995.
Reports fi...gs 011995 Mill~ LtgisUltuTt's Mlet Artrra Task ForceN which S1lrwytd all o/the U$tJ'S ill the
SNW tUlcI ff)lkdtfl otMr "'* rel4ltd to 1wdrey pdl'tidptJlicm and projtcted nttd for additional ice tlTt'lllU.
.
:lOp:p.mq.<ur
'$U01I>>/OrII! r661.~",1M 1'661.IDM 1l.1l/I 6861.ItJM IIIO.fIDIlIp uo~ 110 ~ SIJOd~
.......DaIl.....I~ 1IOpat-Y' Aa1f~H '.1101\. "'UO*,U!MI
.
'#/<<NpS:Jf1'I"J "fUDIMIU1Jf MiI.IDj root.IDM AlIp 1'661 .IIlIM IIIO.j bIDJI>>{tutl ~ydot4<N." SIJOd~u
"SfOOIPS 0JtCIIId~ ~~ I'UI
-'>>1/ AIIIPI/'PI>>fAIII fJIIDl:fI4I IOI.~ &,DI06M/MInJo ~"IIO n~SIJDd~U
7:UD.i".1 &7pIIQ ~ ~"1S ~.w
:PiJ1IIIpIIp Ga31Usj"11
~UUIIVJ 8Op:)y ..~ ~I . ~Y' ~ 'IJIIOA quoaana!K
01 *"
Qf7:l;:n OCIIT/T^
r.l..
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. _, approved by the City
Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, on February 12, 1996:
Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA,
ESTABLISmNG SECTION 1301.02 OF THE CITY CODE OF
ORDINANCES RELATING TO LICENSE, PERMIT, SERVICE CHARGES
AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES.
The Ordinance is intended to provide a fair, equitable, and consistent means of
establishing fees and charges by the City for licenses, permits, service charges and
miscellaneous fees.
.
A printed copy of the Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the
Office of the City Oerk and at the Excelsior Library.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota
this 12th day of February, 1996.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ArrEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
.
~~
j-"
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 130\ OF THE
SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO
LICENSE. PERMIT. SERVICE CHARGES
AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
MINNESOTA. ORDAINS:
Section 1: Section 1~01 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby repealed and the
followini is ado,pted in its place:
1301.02: ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES AND CHARGES: Fees and
charges by the City are hereby established as set forth in Schedule A.
Each section of the City Code which contains any such fee or charge is hereby
amended to reflect the amount set forth in Schedule A. If this Title 1300 does not
establish a fee or charge, it shall remain as stated in other sections of the City Code.
SCHEDULE A
I. TYPE OF
. CHARGEIFEE
Police Alarm Permits
Fire Alarm Permits
Recreational Fire Permit
Open Burning Permit
Boat Docks & Boat Storage
Facility License
Intoxicating Liquor License
Wine License - On-Sale
Intoxicating Malt Liquori
Wine License - On-Sale
Liquor Special Club License
Special Sunday License
Nonintoxicating Malt
Liquor License - On-sale
Nonintoxicating Malt Liquor
Liquor License - Off-Sale
Nonintoxicating Malt Liquor
Temporary License
.
CITY CODE
REFERENCE
601.06.1
601.06.1
501.03
501.03
304.05
CHARGE/FE~
$ 100.00 3rd false alarm & thereafter
150.00 2nd false alarm & thereafter
No Charge
100.00 per site
35.00
403.06.1 7,500.00
403.06.1 1,000.00
403.06.1 2,000.00
403.06.1 250.00
403.06.1 200.00
402.06.2 300.00
402.06.2 50.00
402.06.2 25.00
.
.
.
'>
I. TYPE OF
CHARGE/FEE
Do~ Licenses
Speeial Pel'ft'lit, mere thas 2
Deg3
She Jl Deg Lieeftse
Kennel License
Horse Permit
Animal Impound Fees
Street Excavation Permit
Gambling License
Individual Sewage Disposal
System Contractor License
Master Plumber Registration Fee
Residential Recycling Fee
Sewer Connection Permit
Sewer Service
Sanitary Sewer Surcharge
Local Sewer A vail. Charge
Refuse Hauler License
Tree Trimmers License
Water Connection Permit
Water Meter - 3/4"
3/4" Horn
1" Meter
1" Horn
Pressure Reducing Valve
Late Meter Reading Fee
Meter Test
Water Service
CITY CODE
REFERENCE
701.03.2
791.04.1
791.04.2
701.04.2
702.04
701.08.4
90 1.0 1.2b
301.06.2
301.06.1
506.05.5
904.08.1b(2)
904.07.1
904.15.1a
904.09.5
904.18.3
507.05.4
305.01
903.03.1a
903.03.1b(2)
903.08.6
903.08.4
903.09.1a
Water Service - Low Income 903.09.1a(1)
Water Turn-on & Shut-offFee 903.04
Base Water Special Assessment (R) 903.18.03
Water Trunk Charge (T) 903.18.06
Such charge may be assessed
for a term of 15 years, with
payment beginning the
following levy year
Water Connection Fee 903.03.3
Special Assessment Search
CHARGE/FEE
5.00
1.00 late fee
5.00 per tleg
5.00
25.oo/initiallicense
10.OOIrenewallicense
25.00
50.00 1st offense of year
100.00 2nd offense of year
ISO.oo thereafter
50.00
100.00 Biennial
25.00 Temporary
~
35.00 I 1,000.00 Bond
100.00
l.oo/molhousehold
100.00
65.OOIqtr/residential
43.33/qtr/residentiallow income
32.501qtr/residential seasonal
77.9OIqtr, + $2.75/ea 1,000 gallons
in excess of 28,500 gallons per
qtr/commercial
loo.oo/mo
1,000.00
50.00 + 25.OOItrUck
30.00
25.00
80.00
20.00
160.00
40.00
75.00
5.00
50.00
22.501qtr minimum, +
$1.4511,000 gallons in excess
of 10,000 gallonslqtr
15.OOIqtr minimum
25.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
15.00
I. TYPE OF
CHARGE/FEE
Mailed Minutes (Qonresident)
CITY CODE
REFERENCE
Mailed Agendas (ft6ftl'esiaeftt)
Copies
Recycling Containers
City Code Book
Updates
City Zoning Code
Election Filing Fee
Spring Clean-up Fees
507.09.1
507.09.2
* Or as determined based QpOn ~ctual cost of disposal
Transient Business, Peddling
or Soliciting
Storm Water Drainage Utility
Residential Equivalent Factor
Basic System Rate
Tri-Annual Rental Housing
License Fee, per Unit 1004.03(3)
(includes up to 3 inspection/unit)
Additional Inspections
as Necessary 1004.03(3)
Park & Recreation Use Fees 902.06.3
Skating Rinks (per rink)
Unlighted
Lighted
Tournaments
SoccerlFootball/BaseballlSoftball Fields (per
Resident Base Fee
$ 20.00/day
30.OOIday
50.00/day
100.00
50.00
25.00
50.00
308.08
905.03
Unlighted
Lighted
Tournament
Multi-Use Buildin~s
Damage Deposit
ManorlBadger/CathcartlSilverwood
Freeman
Picnic Pavilions
ManorlBadger/Cathcart
Freeman
25.00
50.00
~ .......)
CQARGEIFEE
.75.00 annual
.25/pagelindividual
35.00 annual
.25/pagelindi vidual
.25/pagelsingle side 8.~"xll"
.50/paie/sin~le side anythin~ larLter
8.00 after 1st container
~...ll.OO
Pre rate eest 25.00/year
20.00
2.00
Up to 10.00
6.00 appliances=
17.00 large furniture=
3.00 tires w/o rims=
6.00 tires w/ rims=
12.00 truck tires w/o rims=
15.00 air conditioners*
.
50.00
3.75/qtr
35.00
20.00/inspection
1O.00lhour
15.00lhour
30.OOIday + attendant salary
.
field)
Nonresident Base Fee
6O.OOIday
9O.OOIday
150.OOIdaY
100.00
150.00
75.00
150.00
75.00
150.00
'.
II. TYPE OF CITY CODE
CHARGEIFEE REFERENCE CHARGE/FEE
Zoning! Amendments 1201.04.1a $ 450.00
Conditional Use Permit 1201.04.1a 200.00 (residential)
1201.05.3a 300.00 + 100.00 escrow
(nonresidential)
Variances & Appeals 1201.05.3a 150.00 + 150.00 escrow
(residential)
Variances & Appeals 1201.05.3a 200.00 + 150.00 escrow
(nonresidential)
Planned Unit Development 1201.25.6b(2)(b) 650.00 + 350.00 escrow
Conc~pt Plan 300.00 + 100.00 escrow
Development Stare Plan 300.00 + 100.00 escrow
Final Plan 3OQ.00 + 100.00 escrow
Site Plan Review/Certificate 1201.07.2 150.00
Subdivision (Metes & Bounds- 1202.03.1a(2) 250.00 + 100.00 escrow
3 lots or less)
Subdivision (preliminary Plat) 1202.03.1a(2) 250.00 + 100.00 escrow
25not plus
Subdivision (Final Plat) 1202.03.1a(2) 500.00 + 200.00 escrow
. 25not plus
Park Dedication 1202.07 ~ 875.OOIunit
(cash in lieu of land)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 200.00 Preapplication
800.00 Formal application
NOTE: Base fees are nonrefundable. Escrow deposits are to cover consulting engineer and attorney
expenses. Applicants are informed that any City expenses not covered by these fees will be billed to
them. Unused escrow fees will be returned to applicant upon written request.
m. TYPE OF
CHARGEIFEE
Building Permit
CITY CODE
REFERENCE
1001.03
CHARGE/FEE
Per 1922.,-88- State Building Code
(S.B.C.)
Per S.B.C. + 200.00 escrow
2% value of work,
20.00 minimum
7.oo/fixture, 20.00 minimum
House Moving Permit
Mechanical Permit
l002.02.4a
S.B.C.
.
Plumbing Permit
Automatic Sprinkling System
Permit
Demolition Permit
Sign Permit Application Fee
Approved Sign Permit Fee
Fence Permit
GradinglFiIling Permit
Home Occupation Permit
S.B.C.
S.B.C.
S.B.C.
1201.03.1lf
1201.03.2f
S.B.C.
1201.03.12c
20.00
50.00*
20.00
Per S.B.C.
20.00
Per S.B.C.
20.00 (limited)
200.00 (special)
20.00
20.00
Irrigation System Permit
R.O.W. Encroachment Permit
901.02.2d
901.02.2b
* Fee is waived when done in conjunction with a building permit or when burned by Fire
Department
Memo
To:
February 7, 1996
Mayor Bean and City Council
/i J
fr
'J
Date:
From: Jim Hmm, Administrator
.
Re:
Park Dedication Fees
.
The Park Dedication Fee was last raised in January 1992 from $500 to
$750. The Park Commission is recommending that the fee be raised again. They
suggested using an inflation factor which could result in an annual adjustment.
Assessor Rolf Erickson recommends using the market value growth of
residential properties as calculated each spring by Hennepin County. If that
number is 5% this spring, staff could advise developers this year that the Park
Dedication fee is likely to increase by 5% the following January.
From January of 1992 through January of 1995 the inflation rate was
16.4%. The 1995 rate will be known in the spring and may be used to adjust the
fee in January of 1997.
Recommended rate change for 1996: $750 X 1.164 = $875 (rounded)
cc: Park Commission
FEB- 5-96 MON 10:25 AM NeA APPRAISALS
('-
FAX NO. 612 473 2791
P. 1
TO; Jim Hunn, Shorewood City Administrator
FROM: Rolf Erickson, Shorewood City Assessor
DATE: February 5,1996
RE: Index for Park Dedication Fee
Hennepin Countyts assessment iJ.'Owth records could be used as an. index for raisini
Shorewood's park dedication fee. Each spring the County calculates the market'V8luo growth of
residential properties. This figure represents the growth ofthc entire residential class of
properties from Januaty 2 of one year to January 2 of the next year.
Growth from January 2, 1992 to January 2, 1993
Growth from 1anuary 2, 1993 to January 2, 1994
4%
5.9%
.
Growth from Ill1uatY 2, 1994 to 1anuary 2, 1995 6.5%
Growth from January 2, 1995 to January 2,1996 (estimated) 3%*
... Available March, 1996
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 902 OF THE
SHOREWOOD CITY CODE REGARDING
USE OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
. Section 1. Section 902.06 Subd. 3 is hereby amended to read:
Subd. 3. Fees: The City Council is authorized to determine an
appropriate fee to be charged for exclusive use, which fees shall
be used solely for maintenance of the parks and recreational
facilities of the City. All nonprofit ana sports organizations
within the Minnetonka School District #276 are exempt from
these fees but may be asked by the Park Commission to donate
an appropriate amount to compensate for their exclusive use of
these recreational facilities.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota
this 12th day of February, 1996.
.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATIEST
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
-tt'l
, -,
BOARD MEMBERS
William A. Johnstone
Chair. Minnetonka
Douglas E. Babcock
Vice Chair, Spring Park
Joseph Zwak
Secretary. Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer. Shorewood
Mike Bloom
Minnetonka Beach
Albert (Bert) Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Duane Markus
. Wayzata
Ross McGlasson
T onka Bay
Craig Mollet
Victoria
Eugene Partyka
Minnetrista
Tom Reese
Mound
Herb J. Suerth
Woodland
Orono
.
,.
~J
60% Recycled Content
30'1'. Post Consume, Waste
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160. WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 . TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
January 31, 1996
;",,"::,'")
': \.-oD
,~-: I":~""
_ ~ I;:; _ 0
Honorable Mayor Robert Bean
5285 st. Albans Bay Rd.
Shorewood, IIN 55331
..
----.~--:::-:.----
----
RE: Lake wide cooperation in a Goose control
program - LCMR grant application
Dear Mayor Bean:
In an effort to control and in certain instances
eliminate established concentrations of geese
around Lake Minnetonka, the LMCD in conjunction
with the university of Minnesota, the DNR and with
the support of the surrounding Lake communities is
attempting to generate support to draft a LCMR
grant application for goose control.
Several preliminary meetings have been held to test
the interest and feasibility for establishing a
protocol for carrying out this task. The next step
is the securing of a commitment for matching funds
from all benefiting communities, as well as the u.
of M., to move forward with a methodology to begin
the grant-writing process.
Based upon LCKR Grant requirements, it is proposed
that each lake cOllDllunity budget $1,000 in the year
1991 and a like amount for 1998. In lieu of these
amounts or a portion thereof, an in-kind matching
contribution in the form of a city appointed
coordinator to assist the u. of M. field staff for
the project duration is also acceptable. In turn,
the University will contribute an amount of $14,000
over the same two year time period. This would
bring the total project amount, with all
contributing to $42,000 which would also be
inclusive of Professor James Cooper, U. of M.
Extension specialist's time commitment.
The final grant submittal date is 4: 30 P. M. ,
February 23, 1996, leaving us with a rather short
time period to respond. Should your council agree
to participate, a letter of commitment addressed to
#I()
" ~
paqe 2
the LMCD would be in order.
Please review the enclosures and make copies as you
deem appropriate for your Council Members. If Dr.
Cooper or I could answer any questions please
contact either of us:
James A. Cooper
Associate Professor
Colleqe of Natural Sciences
104 Hodson Hall
1980 Folwell Ave.
st. Paul, MN 55108 (624-1223)
.
Sincerely,
:Ii. fl/il/dI-
G. Alan willcutt
Executive Director
GAW:jeb
Enclosures
cc: City Administrators
.
-.,
Notes on Oct. 31, 1995 Meeting on
Alternative Canadian Goose Control Approaches
Dr. James A. Cooper ofUniv. of Minnesota
John Parker, DNR Urban Wildlife
.
Ylac.kground
Canadian geese are incligenous 10 J1&iznesola, bull/Jeir populalio12s used 10
be held down by naluralpredalors suc/i as llJolues, coyoles and red foxes. :JIs lhe
predalor nUD2bers decreased in ur6an areas llle Canaclian Seese relurned ~ld
grew in nUD26ers. !](accoons slilllabe a sJ 101/ oj goslings 100. Jfunling has kpl
l.he goose populalion oulside 1.Iie urban area cIon'n 10 a60ul//3 the urban density.
flhe 7tvin Gibes a!lracl Canaclian Seese more liian mosl ur6an areas because oj
011 r exlensive alellandS, slreams & lakes, bul they are probleIl2f in ur6an areas
across Ille 110rl/Jerlz/ia(! oj tIie counlry and paris oj Calzada.
70.11/] Cibes goose populalion now is a6ou125,OOO. PrecliCl f(l1adruplirzg or
even gronl/Ii. 10 /0 limes as many !I nol conlrolled.
.
2itany oj our geese are 04 paUSing In Dugralion. &me nesl and liien JIy
Jar/lieI' nor/h. c.)ome come upJrom Ji{;ssouri G!zd rellJra In fale Jail. <Some halcli
Iheir egS's, and I/le/] leave goslings a1illl 'g.randparenls" llJ1i.r1e l.hey/IyJarlkr
120rlll. YOUl1g rarely breed U1zbf aboul3 years old. Younger ones ojfe12.have /0
fighl/.heir elders /or nesl1ng SItes.
Concerns about Goose Population
Goose flocks leave messy. smelly and unsanitary deposits on lawns, playgrounds,
beaches, golf courses, etc.
Bea\)' density of geese may cause lake pollution.
Geese sometimes attack people. especially children.
Traffic hazard. .
Reasons for Opposition to Goose Control Measures
Many residents like to watch geese & other wildlife by their homes.
Some residents object to "killing wildlife" -- "They have rights too!"
Some residents object to shooting or other noises, or fear safety.
,,*""-'" ,," ~-...
r
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
Removal: Collect. hold and transport geese to remote locations
Contract with University of Minnesota (Dr. Cooper)
Pro: Effective over a year or two
Now being used by many Metro cities
Con: Geese come back after a year or two.
Cost is around $).000 per site
University wants minimum of25 geese at site - preferably 50.
S1au2hter Round up. kill. process and donate to food shelf programs
Done on a limited trial basis this year for first time
Pro: Provides food (protein) for needy through food shelf programs
Con: Is slightly more expensive than removal.
Small numbers at present mean limited impact on population.
Destruction
of e22S
Huntin2
Remove. break or spray eggs with vegetable oil to kill embryos
Pro: Effective in reducing reproduction
Con: Often hard to fmd. reach nests - labor intensive & costly
Prohibited by federal. state. city regulations unless special permits.
Neighbors often object to destruction of '~eir birds."
.
Cities may grant hunting permits during early special goose hunting seasons
Hunters must observe safety restrictions. especially in dense housing areas.
Pro: Can make contribution to lowering goose density
Con: Small scale means very limited impact
Frequent opposition from neighbors
Safety concerns if not properly supervised
Dead Goose Dead goose decoys on property keep geese away temporarily.
Decovs Pro: Effective in keeping geese from landing on property
Con: Decoys must be moved every day or two or geese return.
Scarin2
Devices
Bird Scare
Tape
.
Firing noise makers from pistol launcher scare geese off property.
Projectiles are either "screamers" or "bangers."
Pro: Effective for a day
Con: Must be fired daily to have effect on population
Run mylar strips along shore - 2 layers. 18 to 24" high
Stronger if mylar is wrapped around string.
Pro: Effective in keeping geese from coming off water to lawns.
especially in molting season
Con: Geese soon fmd and use any gaps.
Usually only shifts geese to nearby unprotected property.
Ve2etation
Ba rrier
Retainin2
Wall
D02S
.
Chemical
Reoellent
Woody vegetation border along shores keeps geese off lawns because
they fear predators grabbing goslings in vegetation.
Pro: Effective in keeping geese from coming up on lawns
Natural vegetation along shore also reduced poUution.
Con: Hard to maintain vegetation border as water level rises and drops.
Unless vegetation is continuous geese will find a way through or
around.
Geese don't like to fly up to top of wall if high enough (8 ft.)
Effect similar to vegetation or string barrier .
Pro: Effective unless geese find a way through or around
Con: Many shore residents don't want shore walls
Shoreland restrictions; very expensive to install
Unleashed dogs, especially large ones, chase geese off property.
Pro: Now working in parts of Woodland because we have no leash law.
Con: Dogs only chase geese to nearby property.
Some residents object to dogs roaming freely and barking.
Spray goose repellent chemical on area to be protected.
Pro: Effective in sprayed area., according to manufacturers.
Con: Expensive ($70 for 1/4 acre)
Not yet DNR approved or recommended
Must observe safety precautions in applying
POSSIBLE JOINT ACTION TO CONTROL GEESE
.
There was some discussion of organizing joint action and fmancing from the 14 cItles
around Lake Minnetonka, since this region has a very high concentration of geese. (2, 000
geese counted on Minnetonka in June, '94)
The cities would share the costs of a major and continuing effort.
Such joint action would not simply push the geese to the next door neighbor.
Many cities (Edina. Deephaven. Plymouth. Chanhassen) already have programs.
Invite LMCD & Watershed District to participate.
Seek funding assistance from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources. (This would require legislative support & lobbying.)
Question: Should the cost be borne by the city or concerned residents?
/03/"95 XED
LAKE MINNETONKA CITIES~~CA.A GOOSE PROBLEM SITES .
JUNE~JULY, 1995
aII.E ClI.Y 95 HUDSON ESTIMATED POPULATION
MAP LAT LONG Y B NON~ TOTA
820 LAKE SUSAN HILLS DRIVE CI-WI-IASSEN PROBlEM' 39 3D 44.51267 93.32604 18 8 0 26
LAKE #IN CI-WI-IASSEN REMOVALRANOOM 39 3B 44.5204 93.33418 0 0 0 0
LAKE lUCY CI-WI-IASSEN REMOVAl95 RANDOM 39 3B 44.52595 93.33276 23 12 3 38
LAKE MlNNEWASHTA CI-WI-IASSEN REMOVAl95 38 5B 44.52481 93.3665 36 12 2 50
POND AT 6301 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD OW+IASSEN REMOVAL 39 5A 44.53259 93.31482 0 0 0 0
POND NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD & OXBOW BEND CIW>lH.ASSEN REMOVAl95 39 5A 44.533 93.31708 7 4 0 11
SAODlEBROOl< TRAIl POND NEAR LAKE LUCY OW+IASSEN REMOVAL 39 38 44.52389 93.32833 6 4 0 10
~BAY DEEPHAVEN REMOVAl.95 31 4C 44.55277 93.31711 43 16 1 1 70
ROBINSON'S BAY DEEPHAVEN REMOVAL 31 4A 44.5678 93.31295 0 0 0 0
ST. lOUIS BAY DEEPHAVEN REMOVALFlESURVEY 31 4B 44.56157 93.31652 0 0 0 0
1'tR)PE PARK DEEPHAVEN REM:>VAL 31 5B 44.5606 93.30758 0 0 2 2
EXCElS10R BAY GABLES CONDOMINIUMS EXCElSIOR PROBLEM' 31 30 44.54567 93.33711 18 6 12 36
ST. ALBANS BAY LAKE MINNETONKA GR:ENAOD PROBLEM' 31 30 0 0 35 35
12421 HUNTINGDON LANE MINNETONKA PROBLEM' 32 4B 0 0 0 0
2511 CROSBY ROAD MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 24 20 0
3300 HAZELWOOD WEST MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 REPEAT 32 3A 44.56664 93.27582 22 8 0 30
CARGILL 6000 CLEARWATER MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 40 4A 44.53722 93.26511 24 8 1 33
CARGIU. RESEARCH OFFICE CENTER MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 24 20 44.57587 93.289 87 36 15 138
CARLSON TOWERSlGATES APARTMENTS M1NNETONKA REMOVAl.95 REPEAT 24 3C 44.58281 93.27912 46 20 2 68
c:x:M.lUNllY CENTER MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 REPEAT 32 4AB 44.56348 93.28013 1 1 6 7 24
FAIRWAYS OF WEST OAKS MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 32 5B 44.56444 93.25099 26 8 1 35
HlU.CREST NURSING HOME MINNETONKA PROBLEM' 24 3C 44.58203 93.28481 9 4 8 21
HOUDAY LAKE WOODLAND FALLS HOMEOWNERS MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 32 20 44.54524 93.2901 53 16 12 81
SHADY OAK ROAD DIMPLE POND MINNETONKA REMOVAL95 32 4B 41 14 0 55
CfTY SWIMMING BEACH MlNNETONKA BEACH REMOVAL95 31 1B 44.5596 93.35626 58 12 67 137
LAFAYETTE COUNTRY CLUB MINNETONKA BEACH REMOVAl95 31 lB 44.56593 93.35588 54 20 8 82
LAKE MINNETONKA2601 WEST LAFAYETTE RD CfO\O PROBLEM' 31 lB 0
LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY NORTH SHORE CfO\O PROBLEM' 31 lA 0 0 6 6
LAKE MINNETONKA NARROWS BRIDGE AREA CfO\O REMOVAL95 31 18 30 8 17 55
SMffif BAY LAKE MINNETONKA BRACKETTS POINT CfO\O PROBLEM' 31 3A 30 12 51 93
GlEASONS lAI<EIClMMARON PONDS PLYMOlTTHWAYZATA REMOVAl95 REPEAT 24 lB 44.59116 93.29422 33 20 54 107
CHRISTMAS LAKE ~ PROBLEM' 39 4A 44.54041 93.3307 0 0 15 15
ENCHANTED ISLAND LAKE MINNETONKA ~ PROBLEM' 30 40 38 18 36 92
LAKE MINNETONKA TIMBER LANE AREA OF GIDEON ~ PROBLEM" 31 10 44.54313 93.34667 11 4 64 79
SILVER LAKE ~ PROBLEM' 39 4A 44.53812 93.31669 0 0 2 2
15 CLAY CLIFFE DRIVE TONKA BAY PROBLEM' 31 lC 44.55231 93.36012 0 0 0 0
NARROWS WEST POINT LAKE MINNETONKA TONI<A BAY PROBLEM' 31 lC 47 17 5 69
555 BUSHAWAY RD (HWY 101) WAVZATA REMOVAL95 24 10 44.57615 93.29786 27 9 45 81
GRAYS BAY WAVZATA PROBLEM' 24 20 16 8 37 61
WAYZATA SWIMMING BEACH LAKE MINNETONKA WAVZATA PROBLEM'REMOVAL96 24 10 44.58094 93.3116 35 14 17 66
WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB WAVZAT~ REMOVAl95 REPEAT 23 3C 44.58409 93.32958 21 8 2 31
LAKE MARION WOOOI..A/'oDS PROBLEM' 31 5A 44.56795 93.31038 0 0 0 0
LAKE MINNETONKA 3110 MAPLEWOOD ROAD WOOOI..A/'oDS PROBLEM' 31 5A 44.57203 93.30744 0 0 0 0
"'" t ~."
. PLEASE COPYIPOSTlDlSTRIBUTE THIS NOTICE
THE LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES (LCMR)
1997 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (Biennium Ending June 1999)
The LCMR will be accepting proposalS for projects designed to help maintain and enhance Minnesota's
natural resources. .
The Request for Proposals (RFP) is for new, innovative or accelerative natural resource projects.
Proposers are asked to respond to the strategies for funding. Proposals will be evaluated according to the
strategies and criteria. Although other proposals may be considered, stated strategies win receive priority.
LCMR staff will conduct proposal workshops on January 24, 1996 and January 30, 1996. See page 2 for
more details.
Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources
Room 65, State Office Building
100 Constitution Avenue
St. Paul, UN 55155
(612) 296-2406
E-Mail: lcmr@commissions.leg.state.mn.us
roo: (612)296-9896 or 1-800-657-3550
Relay: (612}297-5353 or 1-800-627-3529
PROPOSALS SENT BY FAX or E-MAIL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION:
SUBMIT TO:
.
Received or QC)stmarked no later than:
4:30 PM, February 23, 1996
Only proposals received by the deadline in the proper format specified in this RFP will qualify for
consideration. . .
NUMBER OF COPIES TO SUBMIT:
ELIGIBILITY:
.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION:
. TOTAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE:
.Three (3) copies of proposal (two page limit as
specified) and one copy of resume of Project
Manager (one page limit as speCified).
Application open to all with demonstrated public
benefit. The LCMR is an ADA/equal opportunity
employer.
Two year duration - July 1997 to June 1999.
No expenditures allowed after June 30, 1999
unless requested and approved by specific law.
$28.5 million
estimated as of December 1995
Of the $28.5 million available, i is intended that appRllCimateIV $8.5 mIIon
will be recommended for State and Regional Parks and Trails and a Local
Initiatives Grants Program. Approxlmately $20.0 miDion is available for
addiIionaI strategy funding.
FUNDING SOURCES:
· Minnesota Future Resources Fund (MS 116P.13), estimated amount available $14.5 million
.. Minnesota Environment and Natural Resource Trust Fund (Trust Fund) (MS 116P.08),
estimated amount availabte $14 million
· Great Lakes Protection Account (MS 116Q.02), estimated amount available $40,000
1
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION PROCESS
The Commission will employ a variety of tools in the proposal evaluation process:
1. Strategies and criteria as presented in the RFP will be applied. LCMR staff will sort all proposals by
strategy and rank them aCCOrding to the criteria for use by the LCMR members during their initial
selection process.
2. LCMR staff will seek additional outside review as needed to focus on improving proposals and
COOrdination. The staff review may include seeking revisions to the proposals by which proposaJs
may be strengthened, either technically or in terms of the range of activities included. Review may
also reveal areas where increased cooperation and COOrdination on a proposal might be appropriate
and result in a request for consideration of merger with one or more other proposals.
3. The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Trust Fund will perform an initial review of proposals
and provide the Commission with their determination as to which projects best frt the strategies and
criteria in the Strategic Plan for the Trust Fund as well as the Trust Fund law.
4. The LCMR members will review all proposals received and select approximately 150 proposals to
schedule for a hearing. Atter the initial selection of proposals for further consideration, additional
information about the prOPOsals will be requested of program managers to aid in the decisionmaking.
At the hearings, program managers will be requested to appear before the Commission to explain
the project and the specific project results associated with completion of the activities of the project.
5. The Commission will make its funding recommendations to the Legislature in summer of 1996. The .
Commission will determine which funding source is appropriate for a proposed project.
6. An additional, separate. technical peer review process will be conducted before presentation to the
legislature for research proposals recommended by the Commission. An interdisciplinary peer
review panel, compriSed of natural resource experts from across the U.S., will review recommended
projects for the adequacy of the methOdology and prOCedures, the need for the proposed research,
and qualifications of the investigators. A detailed work program will be required for these projects by
or before September 1996 to be used in the peer review process. Program managers will be
requested to present their proposed work program to the panel.
Finally, when acted on by the 1997 Legislature and with Commission work program approval, funds will
be available for projects beginning July 1, 1997.
..'..~... a--,._
.
.
\
..
.
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
339 THIRD STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
TELE: 612-474-5233
January 18, 1996
The Honorable Robert Bean
and Councilmembers
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Cub Road
Shorewood,~ 55331
Dear Mayor Bean and Councilme~bers:
.
The Excelsior Fire Department has. been experiencing an increasing number of
responses to carbon monoxide (CO) alarms due to increased media attention on recent
deaths from CO poisoning. In 1995 the total number of CO alarm calls was 14, whereas
in the first 16 days of 1996 there has already been seven (7) calls. All of these calls had
readings under 9 parts per million (PPM), which is not considered life threatening. I
have attached a copy of Fire Chief Mahaffey's report to the Excelsior City Council
regarding the CO Alarms.
The Fire Department has responded to a total of 43 calls just in the first sixteen
(16) days of 1996. If calls continue at this rate, the Department would respond to 981
calls, which far exceeds the 550 calls which have been budgeted for in 1996. Therefore,
the Excelsior City Council felt it was necessary to establish a policy for the Fire
Department regarding responses to CO Alarm calls.
.
The Excelsior City Council, at their Tuesday, January 16, 1996 meeting,
established a new policy whereby the Excelsior Fire Department will onlv resoond to a
CO Alarm can if it is determined bv tbe 911 Ooerator there is a medical ememenC"/.
Council also directed me to inform all contract cities of the new policy.
If you have any questions regarding the policy please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~
Carl Zie
City Manager
r-
CZ:cj
CC: ~s Hurm, City Administrator
1:/;118
~JlsRlOTr ~Rn ~qrJrlmnt
339 THIRD STREET
EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331
(612) 474-5364
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Excelsior City Councilmembers
Excelsior City Manager
.
FROM:
Dick Mahaffey, Chief
January 16, 1996
DATE:
RE: Carbon Monoxide Alarms, Response by Excelsior Fire Department
1. Excelsior Fire Department is experiencing an increasing number of responses to
carbon monoxide alarms. This is true throughout the entire United States.
Protocol must be established regarding responses depending upon the manner in
which the report is received.
2.
The 911 operator receiving the initial call seeks certain information, i.e.; type of
alarm sounding; anyone having flu like symptoms, nausea, etc.; if it has been
determined a CO alarm as opposed to a smoke/heat detector; how long it has
been activated; if it shows a readout; and, what the readout may be.
.
3. Should the answers be of a negative nature - no illness and everyone feeling fine,
does the Council wish the fire department to respond with one engine and a
monoxide (multi-gas) detector in order to determine the presence of CO in
amounts in excess of 9 PPM. These readings are not necessarily life threatening,
but do warrant an investigation as to the cause. When we receive such readings
we have been requesting the presence of a Minnegasco crew to confirm/deny a
problem. Or does the Council want us to disregard the homeowners concern if
the reading is below 9 PPM and not respond? We have a cost factor in operating
the department as well as an obligation to the homeowner. From a liability
standpoint what would your desires be in not responding?
4. With our population increasing in our service area we are making more and more
calls with fewer firefighters. We don't want to get to a burnout situation from a
personnel standpoint.
SERVING THE SOUTH LAKE AREA SINCE 1889
OEEPHAVEN . EXCELSIOR . GREENWOOD . SHOREWOOO . TONKA BAY
Memo - Excelsior City Council and Manager
RE: Response to Carbon Monixide Alarms
January 16, 1996
Page 2
5. For your information I offer the following data:
Monoxide alarms - 1995 (entire year)
Total calls - 14
Monoxide alarms - 1996 (to date - 1116196)
Total calls - 7
.
As you can see we have reached 112 our 1995 total in only 16 days of 1996. This
is probably attributed to the increased awareness of CO deaths/alarms throughout
the country.
By cities (1995 - 1116196) the tally is:
Excelsior 3
Shorewood 10
Tonka Bay 0
Greenwood 1
Deephaven .1
Total 21
.
6.. The membership and officers of the department would like to go on record as
responding tv all CO alarms where illness is a factor a.o.d not responding to calls
where there is no indicated reading from the homeowners instrument and/or no
one is having any ill effects.
Frequently Asked Questions About Carbon
Monoxide Detectors
What is carbon monoxide (CO) and why do I need a carbon
monoxide detector?
Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless, taSteless and toxic gas produced as a by-product of
combustion. Any fuel bwning appliance, vehicle, tool or other device has the potential to produce
dangerous levels of carbon monoxide gas. Examples of carbon monoxide producing devices commonly
in use around the home include:
. Fuel fIred fwnaces (non-electric)
. Gas water heaters
. Frreplaces and woodstoves
. Gas stoves
. Gas dryers
. Charcoal grills
. Lawnmowers, snowblowers and other yard equipment
. Automobiles
The Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) reports that approximately 200 people per year are
killed by accidental CO poisoning with an additional 5000 people injured. These deaths and injuries are
typically caused by improperly used or malfunctioning equipment aggravated by improvements in
building construction which limit the amount of fresh air flowing in to homes and other structures.
While regular maintenance and inspection of gas burning equipment in the home can minimize the
potential for exposure to CO gas, the possibility for some type of sudden failure resulting in a potentially
life threatening build up of gas always exists.
What are the medical effects of carbon monoxide and how do I
recognize them?
Carbon monoxide inhibits the blood's ability to carry oxygen to body tissues including vital organs such
as the heart and brain. When CO is inhaled, it combines with the oxygen carrying hemoglobin of the
blood to form carboxyhemoglobin. Once combined with the hemoglobin, that hemoglobin is no longer
available for transporting oxygen. How quickly the carboxyhemoglobin builds up is a factor of the
concentration of the gas being inhaled (measured in parts per million or PPM) and the duration of the
exposure. Compounding the effects of the exposure is the long half-life of carboxyhemoglobin in the
blood. Half-life is a measure of how quickly levels retwn to normal. The half-life of carboxyhemoglobin
is approximately 5 hours. This means that for a given exposure level, it will take about 5 hours for the
level of carboxyhemoglobin in the blood to drop to half its current level after the exposure is terminated.
)lB
The following table describes the symptoms associated with a given concentration of COHb:
10%
symptoms a.nd Medical Consequ8Zlces
% COBb
1St
25%
Mild headache.
No symptoms. Heavy smokers can have as much as 9% COHb.
Nausea and serious headache. Fairly quick recovery after
treatment with oxygen and/or fresh air.
30%
Symptoms intensify. Potential for long term effects
especially in the case of infants, children, the elderly,
victims of heart disease and pregnant women.
45t
Unconsciousness.
50t+
Death.
Since one can't easily measure COHb levels outside of a medical environment, CO toxicity levels are
usually expressed in airborne concentration levels (PPM) and duration of exposure. Expressed in this
way, symptoms of exposure can be stated as follows:
PPM co
Time
35 PPM
8 hours
200 PPM
2-3 hours
400 PPM
1-2 hours
800 PPM
45 minutes
1600 PPM
20 minutes
3200 PPM
5-10 minutes
6400 PPM
1-2 minutes
12,800 PPM
1-3 minutes
Symptoms
Maximum exposure allowed by OSHA in the
workplace over an eight hour period.
Mild headache, fatigue, nausea and dizziness.
Serious headache- other symptoms intensify.
Life threatening after 3 hours.
Dizziness, nausea and convulsions.
Unconscious within 2 hours. Death within 2-3
hours.
Headache, dizziness and nausea. Death within
1 hour.
Headache, dizziness and nausea. Death within
1 hour.
Headache, dizziness and nausea. Death within
25-30 minutes.
Death.
As can be seen from the above information. the symptoms vary widely based on exposure level, duration
and the general health and age on an individual. Also note the one recurrent theme that is most
significant in the recognition of carbon monoxide poisoning- headache, dizziness and nausea. These 'flu
like' symptoms are often mistaken for a real case of the flu and can result in delayed or misdiagnosed
treatment. When experienced in conjunction with a the sounding of a carbon monoxide these symptoms
are the best indicator that a potentially serious buildup of carbon monoxide exists. This comment will be
returned to later.
What are the different types of carbon monoxide detectors and
how do they work?
There are a number of different types and brands of carbon monoxide detectors on the market today;
They can be most easily characterized by whether they operate on household current or batteries.
Underlying this, in most cases, is the type of sensor employed in the detectors operation. Detectors using
household current typically employ some type of solid-state sensor which purges itself and resamples for
CO on a periodic basis. This cycling of the sensor is the source of its increased power demands.
Detectors powered by batteries typically use a passive sensor technology which reacts to the prolo.nged
exposure to carbon monoxide gas.
Are some types of detectors better than others? How do I select
the best detector for me?
Regardless of the type of sensor used all detectors sold on the market today should conform to minimum
sensitivity and alarm characteristics. These characteristics have been defined and are verified by
Underwriters Laboratory in their standard for carbon monoxide detectors UL 2034. This standard was
most recently revised in June of 1995 and went into effect in October of 1995. This revision specified
additional requirements regarding identification of detector type, low-level (nuisance) alarm sensitivity
and alarm silencing. Under no circumstances should one purchase a detector that is not UL listed.
Each of the two types of detectors mentioned previously has applications in the home along with
associated advantages and disadvantages. The proper detector for each application or installation should
be chosen based on the application requirements and the products specifications. The following are the
principle advantages and disadvantages of the two different type detectors:
Characteri.stic
Household CUrrent Battery Operated
Cost
$30-50 $30-50
Ease of Installation
More difficult- requires Less difficult. Can be
outlet near detector or placed anywhere needed.
'hard wiring' .
Maintenance
No maintenance required Requires periodic
during life of product
(5-10 years). Detector
sensor becomes more
sensitive with age.
Reaction Time/Exposure
Level Display
Gives continuous display
of CO levels updated
every few minutes.
Reset Time
Will reset immediately
once CO problem is
corrected.
replacement of
battery/sensor module
every 2-3 years at a
cost of -$20.
Reaction time depends
on concentration level
and duration of
exposure. Display
information is limited.
Reset time depends on
exposure concentration
and duration. May
require removal of
sensor pack. A silence
button, however, is now
provided/required.
How many carbon monoxide detectors should I have and where
should I place them?
The Consumer Product Safety Commission recommends a detector on each floor of a residence. At a
minimum, a single detector should be placed on each sleeping floor with an additional detector in the
area of any major gas burning appliances such as a furnace or water heater. Installation in these areas
ensures rapid detection of any potentially malfunctioning appliances and the ability to hear the alarm
from all sleeping areas. In general, carbon monoxide detectors should be placed high (near the ceiling)
for most effective use. Detectors should also not be placed within five feet of gas fueled appliances or
near cooking or bathing areas. Consult the manufacturers installation instructions for proper placement
of a detector within a given area. .
What are the most common causes of carbon monoxide detector
alarms?
There are many conditions which can cause a carbon monoxide detector to alarm. Most are preventable
and few are actually life threatening. Ideally through proper placement of the detector and education of
the users the number of preventable calls can be minimized and activation will only occur in the more
serious situations.
Preventable causes of CO alarm activation and the recommended preventive action are as follows:
Cause Preventive Action
Inadequate fresh air venting of the Have a heating contractor install a
,"
home.
Running gas powered equipment or
automobiles in a home or garage
Charcoal grilling in the home or
garage.
Malfunctioning appliances or
equipment in the home.
Malfunctioning or overly sensitive
alarm.
fresh air makeup system in the home
Gas powered equipment or vehicles
should never be operated within a
home or garage- even if the garage
door is open. Since most homes are
typically at a lower pressure
relative to outside air, the gas can
actually be drawn into the home.
Charcoal grilling is a tremendous
producer of carbon monoxide gas.
Charcoal grills should never be
operated in the home.
All fuel burning appliances or
equipment in the home needs periodic
inspection and preventive
maintenance. While all fuel burning
appliances will produce some CO gas,
regular preventive maintenance can
keep this to a minimum.
Buy only UL Listed alarms conforming
to the latest revision (June 1995)
of UL standard 2034. This revision
includes new requirements to minimize
nuisance alarms.
While many causes can be prevented others can not and may occur unpredictably. Not only are these
problems harder to predict but they also tend to be more serious in nature. Examples of these type
problems are:
. Cracked furnace heat exchanger.
. Malfunctioning furnace or water heater.
. Blocked chimney.
. Other unpredictable events- vehicle left running in garage, gas powered device placed near fresh
air vent to home, etc.
Minimizing preventable events allows everyone to take other less preventable and predictable events
more seriously.
What should I do when my carbon monoxide detector goes ofr?
First and foremost, stay calm. As mentioned previously most situations resulting in activation of a
carbon monoxide detector are not life threatening and do not require calling 911. To determine the need
to call 911, ask the following question of everyone in the household:
"Does anyone feel ill? Is anyone experiencing the 'flu-like' symptoms of headache, nausea
or dizziness?"
If the answer to the above by anyone in the household is true, evacuate the household to a safe location
and have someone call 911. Failure to evacuate immediately may result in prolonged exposure and
worsening effects from possible carbon monoxide gas. The best initial- treatment for carbon monoxide
gas exposure is fresh air.
If the answer to the above by everyone in the household is no, the likelihood of a serious exposure is
greatly diminished and one probably does not need to call 911. Instead, turn off any gas burning
appliances or equipment, ventilate the area and attempt to reset the alarm. If the alarm will not reset or
resounds, call a qualified heating and ventilating service contractor to inspect your system for possible
problems. If at any time during this process someone begins to feel ill with the symptoms described
above evacuate the household to a safe location and have someone call 911.
What can I expect to happen if I call 911?
What to expect when calling 911 is based on the polices and procedures of the public safety agencies
serving your community and will vary from area to area. Most public safety agencies are, however,
recognizing the dangers posed by carbon monoxide gas and are adopting similar procedures to the .ones
described below. These procedures are based on information developed by the International Association
of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) and other national and regional associations. The objective of these procedures is
to quickly determine the severity of the situation and provide the proper emergency response. The
following is a summary of what one can expect to happen if the call 911 because a carbon monoxide
detector is sounding:
When initially calling 911 be prepared to provide the following information:
. Your address.
. The type of detector that is sounding.
· Whether or not anyone is feeling ill with 'flu-like' symptoms as previously described.
. Whether or not everyone has evacuated the residence.
. The reading on the detector (if known or available)
The dispatcher will determine the response required based on the answers to the above- most
significantly whether or not anyone is feeling ill.
If anyone is feeling ill and/or you can not or have not been able to evacuate everyone, law enforcement,
medical and fire personnel will be assigned to the call on an emergency basis. Law enforcement to assist
with the immediate ev~cuation of individuals, medical to treat any victims and fire to monitor for CO
gas and assist with the other activities.
If no one is feeling ill, you may be advised to contact your local heating contractor or gas company to
assist you or, more likely, fIre personnel will be dispatched on a routine basis to monitor for CO gas and
advise if a 'real' carbon monoxide problem exists.
As mentioned previously, response policies vary by community and you may wish to call your local flIe
or police non-emergency number to ask what their particular policies are. An example standard
..
operating procedure for CO alarms is attached. This policy is based on the IAFC model procedures and
has been adopted by the Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Association as their 'standard' policy for fIre
departments which are part of that association.
Where can I get further information concerning carbon
monoxide detectors?
Several manufacturers of carbon monox.ide detectors offer toll free numbers for additional information
regarding their products. These numbers are as follows:
llaD.u:faccurer Number
American Sensors 800-387-4219
Enzone 800-448-0535
First Alert 800-323-9005
Jameson 800-779-1719
Nighthawk 800-880-6788
Quantum 800-432-5599
Radio Shack Contact your local store
S-Tech 800-643-5377
Additional information with product ratings is contained in the July 1995 Consumer Reports issue on
home safety products. One word of note regarding the ratings in this issue- the products tested have
probably since be replaced by updated models confonning to the revised UL 2034 standard which took
effect in October 1995. Check with the manufacturer for current information.
This information provided as a public service by the Hamel Volunteer Fire Department.
Comments or questions concerning this document should be directed to:
H. Brandon Guest, Chief
Hamel Volunteer Fire Department
92 Hamel Road
Hamel, Minnesota 55340
(612) 723-5400
guestb@freenetmsp.mn.us
URL=http://freenet msp .mn.us/people/ guestb
Copyright 1995, H. Brandon Guest and Hamel Volunteer Fire Department
.... ... :'
MAYOR
Robert Bean
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Bruce Benson
Jennifer McCarty
Doug Malam
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331.8927 · (612) 474-3236
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Jim Hurm
FROM:
Larry Brown ~
February 8, 1996
.
DATE:
RE:
Victoria Water Agreement
As the City Council is aware, staff has been working with representatives of the City of Victoria to
arrive at an agreement for the sale of water from the Shorewood's water system to the City of Victoria's
northerly distribution system. The agreement has been drafted and is ready to be translated to a final
legal form which could be presented to each City Council for consideration.
.
Last Monday, I received a telephone call from the City Engineer for Victoria stating that the water
agreement may be put on hold. The City of Victoria has recently completed an investigation of the
condition of their southerly water system. The analysis completed indicates that their south system is
also in need of a new well and water tower.
The Victoria City Council has directed the City Engineer to analYze the feasibility of constructing a new
well and water towerwhich would meet the needs of both their north and south systems. This would
eliminate the need to make the connection to the City of Shorewood'swater system.
Based on this information, the City of Victoria has requested that completion of the. water agreement be
put on hold until such time as the feasibility study of interconnection of their systems can be
accomplished. -
Originally, the City of Shorewood had tentatively scheduled a public information meeting for
construction of the watermain to our south City border. Based on Victoria's recent decision, we have
suspended this meeting until further notice.
1t II C"
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
Victoria Water Agreement
February 8, 1996
Page 2 of2
I have emphasized to the Mr. Scott Young, City Engineer for Victoria, that their decision to proceed
with this project will have to be done in a timely manner to allow adequate time for the public
information meetings, public hearings, and construction. Mr. Young assured me that since the Swiss
Mountain Development within the City of Victoria has been approved for final plat and rough grading
started, that their decision will have to be very prompt.
.
.
.
.
To:
From:
Deephaven Mayor.and City Council ~
.'~ J
Bob Gagne, Chair of the Friends of the Southshore Senior Community ',-' .,. ,! .. .
Center '../
Date:
February 1, 1996
Draft Center Regulations
Re:
Attached please find draft regulations for the Southshore Senior Community Center. The
Friends have worked very hard on developing them over the last several months. We hope
you fmd them consistent with what has been discussed in the past. We will have a
representative at your next City Council meeting should there be any questions raised
during your discussion of the regulations.
cc:
Greenwood Mayor and City Council
Shorewood Mayor and City Council
Tonka Bay Mayor and City Council
Excelsior Mayor and City Council
#FII D
. '
FrIends of the Southshore Senior Center
Board of Directors:
Bob Gagne, President
24850 Amlee Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
474-5788 (H)
639-2110 (W)
Jerry Sjoberg, Treasurer
5620 Howard's Point Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
474-3836 (H)
475-3438 (W)
Kathy Gordon, Secretary
Norwest Bank, Excelsior
411 Water Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
.
Lucille Crow
193 Second Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
474-9366 (H)
536-8812 (W)
Jan Gray
5170 Meadville
Excelsior, MN 55331
474-8139 (H)
470-3488 (W)
470-3455 (fax)
.
.
.
PROPOSED DRAFT
January 31, 1998
Southshore Senior/Community Center
Southshore SeniorlCommunlty Center is operated by the Friend. of the
outhshore Senior/Community Center. a not-for-proflt corporation. for
he benefit of the residents of Deephaven. Excelsior. Greenwood,
horewood and Tonka Bay. The Center will serve as the location of the
ve cities-supported Southshore Senior Center program, operated by
enior Community Services, a not-tor-profit organization. The center will
so be available for general community use when not needed by the
outhshore SenIOr Center Program.
e Friends recognize the desirability of having the Center used as much
as possible by residents and community groups ffom the five-city area.
These policies promote the active use of the facility and outline
scheduling procedures and guidelines. They also set reasonable rules,
regulations and fees for use of the facility.
The Friends are self-suitalnlng and must meet building operaUonal costa
and obligations. The Friends receive no tax subsidy to operate the facility
and must charge fees to cover the cost of operation. It Is the Intent of the
Friends that these fees be as low as possible. The Friends have
responsibility tor building operation and use. and plan to operate the
facility in a talr and non-dlscrtmlnatory manner.
Page 1
.
roup 1 :
he Southshore Senior Center Program has first priority to schedule' use
f the facility weekdays between 7 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Individual rooms in
t e facility are available for rental by all other groups if not schedUled by
t e Southshore Senior Center Program. The Southshore Senior Center
rogram is exempt from damage deposits and rental fees during the 7 a.m.
4;30 p.m. weekday times. The Southshore Senior Center Program may
hedule special activities at other times and will be charged only a
ustodlal cost.
roup 2 .
econd priority use of the facUlty will be official municipal meetlflgs .
uch as: City Council meetings: City Commission meetings; municipal
ublic hearings; municipal recognition events honoring citizen volunteers
n oity committees; planning or training meetings.
roup 3
outhshore..based (5 city area) public organizations are third priority.
ivic groups, non-profit organizations, neighborhood associations, and
esident groups which contribute to the well being and betterment of the
ommunity. (At teast 50% of membership roster must reside tn the 5-clty
area).
Group 4
Southshore-based (5 city area) oommercial and business organizations;
Southshore residents for personal use. and churches located in the
Southshore communities are fourth priority.
.
Group 8
Non South shore-based commercial and business organizations; church..
not looated in Southshof8 communities, and non-r8$ldent Indlvlduale are
fifth priority.
Page 2
-
-
-
1. Groups or Individuals SCheduling the Southshare
Senior/Community Center will make arrangements through the
Friends of Southshore. Southshore Senior Center programs, events
and activities will be scheduled before other groups. .
2. Saturday Night: Individuals and groups (Groups 1 to 4) may reserve
the large community room and kitchen for Saturday evenings .
(after 4:30) 24 months in advance. Non-residents (Group 5) may
reserve the same space 18 months in advance. All other scheduling
will be on a first come first served basis. Individuals and groups
from within the five city area may reserve space as much as '12
months in advance and non-resident individuals and groups 8 months
In advance. .
.
3 Residents may not reserve space for non-residents.
4. The Friends may limit the number Of dates an Individual or .'
group may reserve in advance to Insure that one group does not
dominate use Of a particular room or area.
5. A scheduled reservation cannot be replaced by a higher priority
group unless an acceptable alternate space can be arranged.
L
and 1-
.
1. On-site competent adult leadership Is maneJatory at aU tlmN.: The
organization or user group shall assume full responsibility for the
group.s conduct and for any damage to the buildIng or equipment.
The Friends reserve the right to assign superviSOry staff or
maintenance personnel at additional cost to the user If It is .
necessary because of the type of function or activity that is .
scheduled.
2. Decoration plans and/or the use of any equipment belonging ~ an
organization must be requested and approved. P.A. and audio' visual
equipment, coffee pots and other types of equipment will be:.
available to rent and these items may not be. used by a group'. unless
the rental fees have been paid. Any decorations or equipmen~ must
be removed Immediately after the meeting or activity. The Friends
will not assume liability for loss or damage to items belonging to an
Page 3
organization or group. Storage of equipment in the center is 110t
permitted. The excepUon being designated storage space for file
Southshore Senior Center Program.
3. All organizations, groups or IndIViduals using the Center will ,'be
requested to sign a waIVer of liability and provide a Certificate of
Insurance.
Boom ReflUlatlona
1. Normal hours ot operation are 7 a.m. to " p.m. daily, unless other
arrangements are made.
2. Disorderly conduct of any kind Is prOhibited.
.
3. Any damages to facilities or equipment must be reported
Immediately to the contact person.
4. Aooms and areas must be oleaned and left in an Orderly condItIOn.
If additional effort beyond normal oleaning Is required, an extra fee
for the additional costs associated with the cleaning will be !ldded.
s. Smoking Is prohibited In the building. Any Individual or org~niZatlon
violating this policy will lose usage privileges and/or damage
deposit.
8. If deemed necessary by the Friends, Pollee supervision may be
required and must be paid for by the user.
Pund-",ISlna Actlvltl..
1. The Friends will allow the Center to be used for fund-raising.
activities. These activities must be In keeping with the atmosphere
and decor of the center as determined by the Friends.
Page 4
.
.
2. If an event Is to be a fundraiser for a Southshore (50% or more)
organization, whether it be charging admission. selling articles,
advanced saJe or any other means of collecting monies for
fundralslng, the group conducting this fundraiser will be charged
Group 4 rates as set forth in the rate schedule for the center.
Senior Center Program ana Friends of the Southshore Senior I
Community Center fund-raising activities are exempt from this
policy.
II .AI
The Friends reserves the right to cancel any activities or events in the
case of natural disaster, act of God, etc. Deposits made for
reservations are not refundable. Reservations are confirmed upon
receipt of deposit. The Friends reserve the right to cancel any
reservation If contracts are not signed and returned
by the date due.
ft' .. ..
Violation of these rules may. result In the denial of future use of
the Center. Denial of use does not exempt violators from possible
prosecution under applicable City ordinances, State or Federal laws.
-
. I
The Friends will not discriminate against any applicant because of
race, color, religion, national origin. sex, disability, age, marital
status. or stature with regard to public assistance.
Page 5
BOARD MEMBERS
William A. Johnstone
Chair, Minnetonka
Douglas E. Babcock
Vice Chair, Spring Park
Joseph Zwak
Secretary. Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer, Shorewood
Mike Bloom
Minnetonka Beach
Albert (Bert) Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Duane Markus
Wayzata
tEs McGlasson
T onka Bay
raig Mollet
Victoria
Eugene Partyka
Minnetrista
Tom Reese
Mound
Herb J. Suerth
Woodland
Orono
.
ft
~J
60.', Aecyded Content
30% Post Consumer Waste
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160. WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 . TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
January 31, 1996
Mr. James Hurm.
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: The "Special Event Permittinq Process" as it
concerns the potential transfer of undesirable
exotic materials into Lake Minnetonka
Dear Mr. Hurm.:
The LMCD has bequn a proactive program to prevent
the potential spread of Zebra Mussels and other
exotics into Lake Minnetonka.
The Hennepin county Sheriff's Water Patrol, in
conjunction with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District, is responsible for the permittinq of
seasonal special events on Lake Minnetonka. This
includes all fishinq tournaments where the
potential for transfer of exotic materials from one
aquatic system to another represents a major threat
to the Lake. Given our past experience with the
Eurasian Water Milfoil situation and a potential
Zebra Mussel infestation, the concern is hiqh that
a repeat of the Milfoil experience will occur. '
Our initial effort will be to monitor all event'
sponsors and assure that they will provide the LMCD
with the information necessary to meet the
requirements of State Statute MS18.137, copy
attached. We must do everYthinq possible to reduce
the probability of introducinq the "Zebra Mussel"
and other exotics into Lake Minnetonka.
With the approach of ice out, a request has been
made by the Eurasian Water Milfoil/Exotics Task
Force Committee of the LMCD, that all fourteen lake
communities be reminded of this situation and that
each city take the necessary steps to prevent the
launchinq of contaminated boats durinq your city's
permitted special events. The DNR is attemptinq to
monitor the various public access points, however,
many city owned docks as well as any un-manaqed
access points are of special concern.
~IIE
BOARD MEMBERS
William A. Johnstone
Chair, Minnetonka
Douglas E. Babcock
Vice Chair, Spring Park
Joseph Zwak
Secretary, Greenwood
Robert Rascop
Treasurer, Shorewood
Mike Bloom
Minnetonka Beach
Albert (Bert) Foster
Deepf:1aven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Duane Markus
Wayzata
Ross McGlasson
T onka Bay
Craig Mollet
Victoria
Eugene Partyka
Minnetrista
Tom Reese
Mound
Herb J. Suerth
Woodland
Orono
~
~.,
60% Recycled Content
30% Post Consumer Waste
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAVZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160. WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 . TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
Page 2
The ONR, Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol, and
the LMCO are most willing to work with each
community and share in the communications link when
a city sponsored special event is to take place or
at any other time. For informational purposes,
enclosed are copies of the County's Special Event
Permit Application, Minnesota State Statute
pertaining to Undesirable Exotic Species, and the
ONR's Water Craft Inspection Program.
Please feel free to contact me or your LMCO Board
representative concerning the above at any time.
.
:tf2 j//~-#-
G. Alan Willcutt
Executive Director
GAW
.
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cou rthouse Room 6
Minneapolis, MN 55415-1369
Patrick D. McGowan, Sheriff
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: You are required by Minnesota Statute 868.121 to
have a Sheriff's permit prior to holding an event on any body of water. An event
is defined as:
.
"A gathering of persons engaged in (organized) activities on waters
of the state or public property adjacent to .those waters that, in the
sheriff's opinion, would have an impact on public safety or natural
resources. "
There is no charge for this permit in Hennepin County. In order to have a permit
issued, all of the following MUST be filed with our office at least 30 days prior to
the event.
1. A Sheriff's Special Event Permit application and liability release, filled out
in its entirety, including signatures.
2. A letter of permission or a permit must be obtained from the city or cities,
that the event will originate and conclude in.
3.
If your event is a fishing contest, you may also need a DNR Fisheries
permit. Please call the DNR at 297-3287.
.
4. A United States Coast Guard permit must be obtained if the event is to be
held on the Mississippi or Minnesota.Rivers; call (314)539-3971, extension
308.
5. You must have proof of liability insurance, no less than $600,000 per single
incident naming the Sheriff's office as an additional insured.
6. Attach a detailed map of any race course, competition area or ice event
7. Enclose any advertising and sample of entry form.
8. In planning your event, please consider the following:
a. Impact on waterway I surrounding shoreline, and area residents;
Her;.~:-::n. C(.l\..:~'.':, isan eQL;.?! '::::\:.i.t~r.lty emp:cyGr
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
WATER PATROL SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION
WRITTEN PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OR MUNICIPALITY IN WHICH
THIS EVENT IS TO BE HELD. PLEASE ATTACH WRITTEN PERMISSION TO THIS
APPLICATION. THE PERMIT CANNOT BE ISS~D WITHOUT THIS PERMISSION.
The following information is necessary to insure the proper and accurate
issuance of your permit. Please complete this form in its' entirety, and
return it to our office at POBox 187 (4141 Shoreline Dr), Spring Park MN
55384, (612)471-8528, fax (612)471-0314, at least thirty (30) days prior to
your event.
Please PRINT or TYPE
NAME OF EVENT: .
DATE(S) OF EVENT:
EVENT TIME(S):
~EVENT LOCATION (Specific Area, include start and finish locations):
WAS THIS EVENT HELD THE PREVIOUS YEAR: Yes____No____
SPONSORING ORGANIZATION:
CONTACT PERSON:
ADDRESS:
DL=
DOB
PHONE#(H) (W)
~proposed Event Activities:
(Fax)
(Other)
Estimated Participant Attendance:
Estimated Spectator Attendance:
Event Parking Location:
Prizes to be issued:
Will Alcoholic beverages be sold or allowed? Yes___ No___
(over)
Will food be sold? Yes___No___ - What type:
What, if any, structures do you intend t~ place on water/ice?
What extra or unususal hazard (to participants oronon-participants) will be
introduced into the event area:
What type of and number of watercraft will be provided by the sponsoring
organizataion for safety purposes:
. .
Is the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol Office requested for control o~
spectators? Yes___ No____ (If yes, how many deputies do you recommend an..,
why)?
PLEASE NOTE: In order ~o be qranted a permit for your Special Event ~he
quidelines qiven with your application must be followed.
DATE
OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT:
SIGNATURE
TITLE
.
,
.
.
Dept.
.. .
TEL:
).jn 04 i) 1
22:15 No.006 P.Ol
Sdcctc:d Mi,,"esota Statlltr:s Rt..'~tl"/irz,,? Lwtic Sf1tO{'its
Revi!'cd Au.,?ust 4. 199.?.-
M.S.18.316 DEFINITIONS.
SuMivision 1. AppJlcablllty. "h~' definitions in this ~jon apply h') this St'Ction and section
18.317.
Subd.2 Ecologically harmful exotic species. "Ecolo~i('ally harmful exotic species" has the
meaning given in !eCtion 84.967.
Subd.3. Unde!sirable exotic spt"cies. "Undesirable exotic spt-ci(.$" means ~ologk3l1y h.irmful
exotic species that have been determinl~ by the commiS$ioner o( ntltural rl':-;ources to p(l~ a substantial
thrl'at to native SPl'Ci<.$ in this statc'.
Subd.4. Watercraft. "Watcr('raff' means any contrivance USl."'(j llr d(.~~igned for navig.ltion on
water and includes seaplanC$.
Subd.5. Water milfoil. "Water mil(oil" mt'ans Eurasian water mi!foil, myriophyllum
spicatum.
SuW. 6. Waters of the state. "Wilters of the state" has the meaning given in section 103C.OO5,
l'ubdivision 17.
Subd. 7. Zebra mussels. "Zebra mus~ls" means a sp<."C'i($ uf the genus Dreisst~na.
Hi,tory: 1995 f55 C 1 s 2. '
!
t
M.S. 18.317 UNDESIRABLE EXQTIC SI'~CIES.
SuM.1. Transportation prohibiteod. Excepl as provided in subdivision 2, it pt'rson may nOf
transport water milfoil, ;r.('bra mussels, or undesirabk exotic species on a road or highway, as ddined in
S\."'Ction 1('().O2, subdivision 7, or on ((I rest roads.
Subd.la. Placement PrOhibited. ^ pl'rsonmay not plal'e undt-sirilble eXOtlf SPl'Clt.S in public
waters within the state.
Subd.2. Exception. Except as othE!rwjsc prohibited by law, a p<-'rson may trclnsport water
milfoil or umksirable exotic sp('cies {or disposal as part of a hdrv('~t or control cll"t1vity CllOd\lcted under
a permit or as specified by the commissioner.
Subd.3. launching of watercraft with water miUoil or undesirable sp~d~s prohibited.
(a) A person may not place a trailer or launch a watl~rcraft into waters of the statl' if the trailer
or watercraft has attached to it water milfoil. zebra mussels, or other undc.'Sirable exotic species. A
conservation officer or other liccnSt.-d peace officer ma}' (lrdl"r the: rt'moval of water milftlil, 2;cbra
mussels, or other undl$irable exotic SPC{'iCli frtlm ;l lr<liler C.lr watcrcraft before the tr.li1er or watercraft
is placed or launched into waters of the stale.
(b) A commercial harvc::;ter shall c1ciln aquatic plant harvesting equipment of all aquatic
vegetation at a suitable location beiore laur\l'hing tl'll' equipment in anoth(~r body of water.
Subd. 33. Inspection of Watercraft and Equipment. (a) Watercraft and associated equipment
induding weed harvesters, that ilre removed from any wa\(~rs llf the: state that the commissioner of
n.ltural resour<;e:; identifies as Jx.ing contaminated with Eurasian water mil/oil, zebra mussels, or other
undl~sirablc exotic aquatic plants and wild animals identified by the commissioner of natural resources,
shall be randomly inspected between May 1 and October 15 (or" minimum Of 10,000 hOurs by pel""..>Onnel
authorized by the commissioner o( natural r(>SOurc('~. Beginning in calendar year 1994, a minimum of
20,000 hours of random inspections must be conductt'(i p<'r year.
Subd. 4. Enforcement This Sl'Ctiun m.,y LX' enforced by conservation l,,{{kers under sections
9i A.20S, 97 A.211, and 97 A.221, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clau$(' (1), and by other licensed peace
officers.
Subd.5. Penalty. A pt~rson who violatl's subdivision 1, b. 3, ('Ir 3a is guilty of a misdemeanor.
A person who refuses to l)bey the order of a peace olfil."er or conservation uificcr 10 rl'J'novewater milfoil,
zebra mussels, or other undesirable exotic spccil?s from a trailer or watercraft is guilty of a
miWl'ml'Cllwr.
History: 1990 C 391 art 10 s 3; 1990 c 559 s 1: 1992 c 594 s 1-6; 1993 c 235 s 1: 1994 c 623 art 1 s 1-7:
1995fssr:lsJ.
'-"
........"
"r
........"
,(:}. 3 .~
PaSt: 2
~
,
Watercraft Inspection Program
Background
The potential for boaters to accidentally move aquatic exotic species from one lake to another
has long been recognized as a serious threat to Minnesota's aquatic ecosystems. For this
reason, the 1991 Minnesota Legislature mandated DNR conservation officers to conduct
inspections of trailered boats on Minnesota highways. The purpose of these inspections was to
look for Eurasian watennilfoil, issue citations to violators, and to infonn the public about the
potential spread of exotic species. In 1992, the DNR, the Minnesota Lakes Association and
angling groups proposed and supported legislation (adopted as M.S. 18.37, Subd. Ja), Calling
for 10,000 hours of random inspections of watercraft leaving "infested" water bodies containing
hannful aquatic exotic species such as Eurasian watermilfoil, spiny waterflea, and zebra
mussels. Subsequently in 1992, a watercraft inspection program was established by the DNR
to accomplish this mandate. In 1993, legislation was passed increasing the number of hours to
20,000 starting with the 1994 boating season. The program is funded through a five dollar
surcharge on each watercraft license. .
Goals and Objectives
Watercraft Inspectors, employed through the DNR's Minnesota Conservation Corps, conduct
inspections at public water access sites on infested waters. The goal of their effort is to
promote stewardship by educating and actively involving boaters in preventing the spread of
exotic species. Their objectives are to increase public awareness of the threats posed by exotic
species, the laws regarding their transportation, and to show individuals how to inspect and
remove exotics from their own boating equipment before leaving an access.
Watercraft Inspector Duties
Each inspector performs the following duties at the Public Water Access (pW A) sites:
- Inspection of watercraft for bannful exotic species.
- Verbal communication of the laws and issues surrounding the existence, spread and .
effects of exotic species to Minnesota's waters. .
- Distribution of written materials and "Exotic Alert" tags.
- Recording and documenting infonnation and data necessary to evaluate the following:
the spread of exotic species, observances of exotic species on watercraft and
trailers, public awareness, and other pertinent research information.
- Forwarding boater's technical inquiries to DNR specialist.
- Ensuring that public water accesses are weed and debris free while monitoring crews
are present.
- Increase communications with, and field observations for, DNR specialist regarding
new infestations and developments in the field.
Logistics
Minnesota Conservation Corp (MCC)
Watercraft Inspectors are hired under Minnesota Conservation Corps authority which requires
1
that persons working must be between the ages of. 18-26 when hired, a Minnesota resident, and
unemployed or under-employed. .
Setup and Location
The watercraft inspection team consist of 28 MCC employees located in the following areas.
Metro area: 2 supeIVisors and 20 inspectors; Duluth/Superior: 1 inspector; Mississippi
River/Southeast: 1 supeIVisor, 3 inspectors;. Statewide Rover: 1 inspector. The program also
includes a coordinator and a program. assistant from the Division of Fish & Wildlife, Ecological
SeIVices Section.
Inspectors cover 170 PW A' s on infested waters throughout the state. Access administrators
include the ONR, Federal, County, and local governments, and non-profit groups and
organizations. A Right of Entry Pennit has been obtained from all non-ONR administered
accesses.
.
Inspection Priorities
- Concentrate on boater contact at high use lakes and rivers.
- Focus inspection education activities during high use periods such as weekends and
holidays.
- Conduct inspections on infested lakes with PWA's only (58 lakes statewide)
- Conduct inspections on infested rivers and potentially high risk rivers (St. Louis,
Mississippi, Minnesota, St. Croix).
Identification
Identification of the watercraft inspection team:
- 18" X 24" yellow & black sign which reads, ONR Watercraft Inspections.
- Tan ONR issued shirt with MCC patch and ONR patch on sleeves.
- MCC baseball cap.
- Ol't."R employee ID on shirt pocket.
.
Enforcement Authority
The exotic species Watercraft Inspectors have no enforcement authority and cannot write
citations for violations. The watercraft inspectors will not board or enter a watercraft. The
ONR division of enforcement works in cooperation with the watercraft inspectors when
enforcement action is needed.
Communications
All Watercraft Inspectors have cellular phones for communicating with their supervisors, the
program coordinator and assistent, ONR ConselVation Officers, and other licensed peace
officers for emergency situations.
Training
All Watercraft Inspectors receive 16 hours of classroom instruction before the start of the
season and 8 hours of on-site field training.
2
1995 Watercraft Inspection Season
Inspections begin on May 1 and end on October 15 as prescribed in state statute. Within this
24 week period 21,400 inspection hours were logged and 42,956 watercraft/trailer UDits were
inspected. 28 inspectors worked throughout the summer educating the public on watercraft
inspections and exotic species. (Tables 1 and 2, Figure 1).
Table 1. Hours spent inspecting watercraft for exotic species in Minnesota during 1995.
Region I ~ Northwest 231 1%
Region IT ~ Duluth/Superior 186 4%
Region m ~ Central 2,441 11%
Region V - Mississippi 4,291 20% .
River
Region VI ~ Metro 13,633 64%
State-wide Total 21,400 100%
Table 2. Number of watercraft inspections for 1994 and 1995.
Area Number of Percentage of Number if Percentage of
Watercraft Inspections in Watercraft Inspections in
Inspected in 1994 Inspected in 1995
lQQ4 lQQ~
Region I ~ 193 1% 141 <1%
Northwest
Region IT - 541 2% 1,004 2%
Duluth/Superior
Region m - 3,120 11% 3,563 8%
Central
Region V - 4,512 13% 4,251 10%
Mississippi River
Region VI - 24,865 13% 33,991 78%
Metro
State-wide Total 33,891 100% 42,956 100%
3
.
"" 0;
Figure 1
1995 MCC Watercraft Inspections
at Public Water Accesses
on Infested Waters
.
1 Inspector (Roving)
1-l7 Inspections
20 Exotic Alert Tags
237 Hrs.
REGION II
1 Inspector
1.0tM Inspections
728 Exotic Alert Tags
786 81'S.
.
4 Inspectors
4,251 Inspections
3,683 Exotic Alert Tags
4.29781'S.
REGION V
*Roving inspector spent time in Regions I and III.
4
~;..
The majority of infested waters in the state are located within the metropolitan.area and include
some of the most heavily used recreation lakes in Minnesota. As shown in Table 2, inspection
efforts were concentrated in the seven county metropolitan area where 78 % of the inspections
occurred.
The number of inspections conducted per day varies due to weather conditions and boater
activity. The number of inspections conducted exceeded 1994 numbers by over 9000
inspections. This may be due to an exceptionally hot summer and improved economic
conditions. It also may be due to increased inspection activities during typical high use periods
such as holidays and weekends.
Other Accomplishments and Responsibilities
- Provided staffmg for three road checks conducted by the Division of Enforcement.
- Staffed the Exotic Species display for each day of the 1995 Minnesota State Fair. .
- Posted new signs at 176 public water accesses on infested "'ater bodies throughout
the state. The new signs read "Please STOP and Remove ALL Aquatic Plants
and Drain Water from Boat and Trailer"
- Conducted inspections at over 15 different fishing tournaments throughout the state.
- Distributed Exotic Alert Tags on 14,605 vehicles with trailers at access points on
infested waters.
- Conducted a trial Boat Washing Feasibility project. MCC watercraft inspection
supervisors operated the boat. wash at selected infested water access sites for
several weekends in July and August. Watercraft inspectors assisted with
the boatwash, inspections, and additional surveys for the feasibility trial.
Infonnation was collected on public interest in a boat wash service, what the
public would be willing to pay, and cost to operate a boat wash for the DNR.
The 1995 inspection season was generally well received by boaters. Many boaters had positive ..
comments about the program and the DNR's effort to stop the spread of exotic species.
5
.. .
CHECK APPROVAL USTlNG FOR FEBRUARY 12, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 23, 1996
CKNO TO WHOM ISSUED PURF03E AMOUNT
17728 FIRST STATE BANK FEDIFICA TAX $8,007.78
17729 PERA. PERA 2,428.62
17730 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 DEFERREDCOMP 890.43
17731 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 81 7.00
17732 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT CHILD SUPPORT -G. DAVIS 98.50
17733 ANOKA CO SUPPORT/COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT -G. SCHMID 139.44
17734 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE TAX 1,376.51
17735 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 5.49
17736 CHARLES DAVIS WORK BOOT REIMB. 78.00
17737 HAMUNEUNIVERSITY rumON 882.00
. 17738 KATHlEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB 192.31
17739 JOHN JOSEPHSON INVENTORY 150.00
17740 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4TH OTR WATER CONNECTIO " FEE 1,224.00
17741 BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB 100.00
17742 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTIUT1ES 2,837.78
17743 JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE 84.63
17744 PEPSI COLA COMPANY POP MACHINE RENTIMISC 146.38
17745 US WEST COMMUNICATlONSlADVERTlS NG 1,678.87
17746 BELLBOY CORPORATION UQUOR 2,332.41
17747 BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY MISCISUPPLlES 116.91
17748 FLAHERTY'S HAPPYTYME CO MSC 330.50
17749 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO L1QUOAIWINElMISC 3,378.12
17750 HONEYWELL PROTECTION ORTLY MONITORING (FEB-API ) 107.00
17751 JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR WINE 1,588.90
17752 LAKE REGION VENDING MSC 374.44
. 17753 LEHMANN FARMS MSC 28.80
17754 PHIWPS WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE 1,649.82
17755 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS L10UORIWINE 660.05
17756 THE VICTORIA GAZETTE ADVERTISING 41.25
17757 PERA. FEBRUARY PERA LIFE INSU __ .~- 54.00
17758 MEDICA FEBRUARY HEALTH INSU. . u ._ - 4,341.04
17759 HEALTHPARTNERSlMEDC~ FEBRUARY HEALTH INSUI"1AN' t: 1,397.56
17760 GROUP HEALTH INC FEBRUARY HEALTH INSU. . u ._ - 1,492.28
17761 LEAGUE OF MN cmES FEBRUARY DENTAL INSURANC 1= 535.70
...
17762 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE FEBRUARY SIT DISABILITY 90.00
17763 COMMERCIAL UFE INS CO FEBRUARY LIFE INSURANCE 82.90
17764 AFSCME COUNCIL 14 FEBRUARY DELTA DENTAL 224.00
17765 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES AIRTIME/CELL PHONE 345.33
17766 CONNIE BASTYR MILEAGElPARKlNG 15.95
17767 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER DECEMBER PRISONER EXPENSE 90.00
17768 JAMES HURM MILEAGElEXPENSES 52.10
Page 1
.
CKNO
17769
17770
17771
17772
17773
17774
17775
17776
17777
17778
17779
17780
17781
17782
17783
17784
17785
17786
17787
17788
17789
17790
17791
17792
17793
17794
17795
17796
17797
17798
17799
17800
17801
17802
17803
17804
17805
17806
17807
17808
17809
-
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 12, 1996 COUNCIL MEEllNG
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 23, 1996
TO WHOM ISSUED PlJRFOSE
MADISONlMARQUETTE FEBRUARY RENT-L1Q 1
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APP FOR RETAILERS CARDILIOIWII
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
PEPSI COLA COMPANY MSC
PIZZA HUT SNOWMOBILE TASK FORCE
RESEARCH OUIK SNOWMOBILE TASK FORCE
CITY OF TONKA BAY FEBRUARY RENT-TaNKA BAY LIO
TWIN CmES STORES, INC OVERPAYMENT OF ALARM PERMIT
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS/ADVERTISING
JOAN OLSON ESCPDN REFUND
BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY L1OUORIWINE/MISC
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR L1QUORIWINE
LAKE REGION VENDING MSC
L1NDERHOLM TRUCKING FR8GHT
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS LIQUORIWINE
RYAN PROPERTIES, INC FEBRUARY RENT -LlQ II
V AL-PAK ADVERTISING
KEN POTTS NOV & DEC PROSECUTIONS
CHICAGO TITLE S/A OVERPAY-REISSUE FROM 93
FIRST STATE BANK FED/FICA TAX
PER<<\ PER<<\
ICMA RETlREMENTTRUST-457 DEFERREDCOv1P
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT CHILD SUPPORT -C. DAVIS
ANOKA co SUPPORT/COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT -C. SCHMID
AFSCME COUNCIL 14 JUNE 951FEB 96 UNION DUES
MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD
KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB
PATRICIA HELGESEN SEC 125 REIMB
BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE
REBECCA TARVIN MILEAGElPARKING
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT FEBRUARY WASTE REMOVAL
BRYNMAWR L TO PARTNERSHIP ESCROW RaEASE
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS COMPUTER MAINTENANCE
BELLBOY CORP LIQUOR
BELLBOY BAR SUPPLY SUPPLlESlMISC
Page 2
AMOUNT
5,793.51
60.00
205.71
66.20
24.00
1,208.68
1,000.00
100.00
179.32
150.00
2,506.49
4,251.32
4,140.22
442.52
96.80
759.66
1,386.16
2,576.88
485.00
2,916.66
1,380.58
8,062.01
2,425.73
1,028.34
817.00
98.50
1 39.44
277.90
1,402.46
192.31
108.12
100.00
2,216.53
83.73
17.15
217.74
151.00
14,500.00
1,100.00
1,576.85
309.90
CKNO
17810
17811
17812
17813
17814
17815
17816
17817
17818
17819
17820
. 17821
.
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 12, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 23, 1996
TO WHOM ISSUED
MIDWEST COCA-GOLA
DAY DISTRIBUTING
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
JOHNSON BAOS LIQUOR CO.
LAKE REGION VENDING
LEEF BAOS
L1NDERHOLMTR~NG
MARK VII
NORTH STAR ICE
PHIWPS WINE & SPIRITS
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
PlJAR)SE
MSC
BEEAlMISC
L1QUORIWINE
L1QUORIWINE
MISe
MAT CLEANING
FA8GHT
BEEAlMISC
MSC
LIOUORIWINE
L1QUORIWINE
BEEAlMISC
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
Page 3
AMOUNT
149.50
6,817.95
4,610.14
1,281.27
408.48
25.17
22.40
7,401.51
107.40
3,949.71
387.20
18 379.65
CITY OF SHORE WOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
FEB. 12, 1996 COUNCIL MTG
CHECKj:f
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
------------------------- ------------------------ ----~--- -----------
17822 A~1 MTKA RENTAL BADGER W/H PARKS & 42.60
17823 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK ORIGINAL ISSUANCE FEE WATER DE 175.00
17824 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER _._------ 9.58
17825 JEFF REINHART DBA .J ANUARY .JANITORIAL MUN BLDG 260.00
17826 BIFFS, INC. PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PARKS & 245.04
.17827 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT SNOW & I 1,887.13
17828 CHAMPION AUTO STORE tt344 FUNNEL CITY GAR 2.12
.829 COOI~DINATED BUSINESS SYST TONER
MAINT CONTRACT
*** TOTAL FOR COORDINATED BUSINESS
GEN GOVT 103.33
MUN BLDG 461.93
565.26
17830 CROSSTOWN-OCS, INC. COFFEE
MUN BLDG 77.97
17831 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING 95 WATER PROJECT
WATER DE 18,236.20
17832 E-Z RECYCLING INC. JANUARY RECYCLING
RECYCLIN 2,875.00
17833 FEED~RITE CONTROLS, INC. CONTAINER RENTAL
WATER DE 50.00
17834 FINA FLEET FUELING FUEL
GAS CANS-PARKS
*** TOTAL FOR FINA FLEET FUELING
CITY GAR 335.37
PARKS & 19.10
354.47
"'835 FIRST TECH TONER FOR PRINTER
17836 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, IN ONE CALL SERVICE
ONE CALL SERVICE
*** TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL
GEN GOVT 257.08
WATER DE 7.00
SEWER DE 7.00
14.00
17837 HANCE HARDWARE, INC. BADGER WARMING HOUSE PARKS & 15.28
17838 JIM HATCH SALES CO. SHOVELS/RAKE BLADES CITY GAR 120.30
BATTERIES TRAF CON 30.53
VESTS CITY GAR 26.26
*** TOTAL FOR .JIM HfHCH SALES CO. 177.09
17839 HOPKINS PARTS COMPANY
8ULBS/OIL FILTERS
CITY GAR
55.50
17840 INTRNTL CITY/COUNTY
WORKSHOP~J. HURM 5/10-12 ADMIN
295.00
17841 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE
96 MEMBERSHIP (T. NAA8) GEN GOVT
85.00
17842 KENNEDY & GRAVEN
LEGAL SERVICE-SS SR CTR PROF SER
310.00
17843 KAR PRODUCTS
~?HOP SUPPLIES
CITY G?iR
77 . .::'0
J.7 :':;44 LJir.~~I<. I i'.1, !"IOFF~11~';i'--!, D~;lL 'y' "" DECEMi3EP U:::G(::jL
;:J r~~ () r:: s;:: f?
1.,2,::';'1..10
Page 4
CITY OFSHOREWOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
FEB. 12, 1996 COUNCIL MTG
CHECK~ VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
-----.--- ------------------------- ------------------------ -------- -----------
DECB1BER LEGAL
DECEMBEi~ LEGAL
DECEMBER LEGAL
DECEMBEF~ LEGAL
DECEMBER LEGAL
*** TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN,
-------- 90"00
-------- 135.00
PROF SER 66.5.40
PROF SER 43.00
-------- ~~659N20
DAL 3,826.70
.1784.5 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES .1996 LMC DIRECTORIES GEN GOVT 2.12.74
17846 LEGAL COURIER DELIVERY TO VICTORIA WATER DE 9.00
17847 MAC WAREHOUSE SYSTEM 7.5 SOFTWARE GEN GOVT 102.00
17848 H.C MAYER AND SONS, INC. HYD OIL/GREASE CITY GAR 887.37
.949
MAMA 96 11EMBERSH I P (J. HURM) ADMIN 25.00
178.50 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY REGISTRATION TAX CITY GAR 189.00
1785.1 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL PROTECTION EQUIP BOOKLET -...-..---...-...-- 24.52
.17852 MINNEGASCO
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
FOR MINNEGASCO
WATER DE 199.49
WATER DE 137.80
-------- 121.64
WATER DE 145.96
CITY GAR 652.26
PARKS & 119.38
MUN BLDG 241.16
-------- 73.67
-------- 122.17
1,8.13.53
***
TOTAL
.
.17853 WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC.
SAND
SNOW & I
17854 MUNICI-PALS
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
GEN GOVT
17855 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE BATTERIES
BROOM
FURNACE FILTERS
S:rDElf.u~LK SALT
*** TOTAL FOR NAVARRE TRUE
1,857.55
10.00
CITY GAR
PARKS &
PARKS &
MUN BLDG
75.2.1
VALUE
17856 N HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLL HOME PAGE INTERNET-NAAB GEN GOVT
17857 NORTHERN
CERAMIC HEATERS-BADGER
PARKS &
17858 NORTHERN STATES POWER
STREET LIGHTS
TRAF CON
17859 ORR,SCHELEN,MAYERON/ASSOC DEC ENGINEERING
DEC ENG I 1'.J,EER I NG
DEC ENG/WATER TOWER ENG
DEC ENGINEEF~:rNG
DEC ENGIr..J,I::ERING
ItJATER DE
Page 5
1.1. O~$
4..25
23.34
36.59
49.50
127.78
2,270.54
2,013.88
9.14.20
36,,5.14.49
1,,045.69
9.1~1.. 8E~
CITY OF SHORE1tJOOD
.CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
FEB. 12, 1996 COUNCIL MTG
CHECK~ VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
~------- ~--------~--------------- -----~------------------ -------- -----------
*** TOTAL FOR ORR,SCHELEN.MAYERON/ 41,40'7.14
17860 PEPSI COLA COMPANY POP PURCHASE t1UN SLOG 124.15
POP MACHINE RENTAL MUN SLOG 1.1.53
*** TOTAL FOR PEPSI COLA COMPANY 135.68
17861 SATELLITE SHELTERS" INC
17862 SPRINGSTED
17863 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY
17864 SO LK MTKA PUB SAFETY DEP
. *** TOTAL
17865 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC
*** TOTAL
CATHCART W/H PARKS &
3.18.44
REDEMPTION GO BONOS 1989 --------
102.30
REAR SPRING ~29 PUB WKS
TRAFFIC OFFICER
COURT OT
FOR SO LK MTKA PUB SAFET
MINUTES
MINUTES
FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITe
17866 TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUPP SANDING DISC/OIL
BEARING FOR SWEEPER ~44
FOR TONKA AUTO AND BODY
*** TOTAL
.17867 TSP/EOS
17868 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES
17869 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS
,,870 W HENN HUMAN SERVICES
7871. WIDMER, INC.
17872 ZIEGLER, INC.
***
ARCHITECH SERVICES-SSSC
UNIFORMS
FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGNS
96 OPERATING BUDGET
DRAINAGE/RIP RAP-RUSTIC
CUTTING eDGeS
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
***
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
Page 6
234.99
POLICE P 3,412.66
POLICE P 593.55
4,006.21.
GEN GOVT 370.00
PLANNING 91.75
46.1.75
CITY GAR 5.1..10
PUB WKS 1.1.1.62
.162.72
PROF SER
8,786.34
CITY GAR
5.15.86
CITY GAR
20.85
COUNCIL
1,34.1.00
.13,625.00
CITY GAR
786.40
109,451.94
258,013.54
C H E C K REG I S T E R
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK
TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT
MAN 1 23 96 77 DERAK R. ANDING 210265 248.59
COM 1 23 96 101 SCOTT M. BARTLETT 210208 112.30
COM 1 23 96 110 CONNIE D. BASTYR 210209 353.76
COM 1 23 96 115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN 210210 1183.53
COM 1 23 96 120 ROBERT 8. BEAN 210211 230.87
COM 1 23 96 122 BRIAN M. BECKER 210212 40.63
COM 1 23 96 125 BRUCE E. BENSON 210213 184.70
COM 1 23 96 345 PATRICK C. CRETAN 210214 167.26
COM 1 23 96 375 JODI A. DALLMAN 210215 33.25
COM 1 23 96 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 210216 745.27
COM 1 23 96 775 JAMES C. EAKINS 210217 676.36
COM 1 23 96 1001 JOHN M. FRUTH 210218 72..64
COM 1 23 96 1105 KERI ANNE GRAF 210219 11.09
COM 1 23 96 1175 ALAN S HASKINS 210220 108.39
COM 1 23 96 1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 210221 612.04
. COM 1 23 96 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 210222 570..20
COM 1 23 96 1415 SHAWN D. HEMPEL 210223 45.37
COM 1 23 96 1550 JAMES C. HURM 210224 1629.65
COM 1 23 96 1601 BRIAN D. JAKEL 210225 74..11
COM 1 23 96 1700 JEFFREY A. JENSEN 210226 831.31
COM 1 23 96 1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON 210227 900..45
COM 1 23 96 1940 LOREN A. JONES 210228 116.63
COM 1 23 96 1950 MARTIN L. JONES 210229 66..20
COM 1 23 96 2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 210230 632..56
COM 1 23 96 2250 JASON N. KOERTING 210231 34..63
COM 1 23 96 2350 STEVE E.. KUCERA 210232 146.03
COM 1 23 96 2450 HANS Z.. LARSON 210233 55..59
COM 1 23 96 2500 SUSAN M.. LATTERNER 210234 739.03
COM 1 23 96 2550 PETER W. LENZEN 210235 49.87
COM 1 23 96 2750 ALEX E.. LOCKOVITCH 210236 147..72
COM 1 23 96 2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOWSKI 210237 1135..57
. COM 1 23 96 2810 KARENA M. LUNDBY 210238 40..17
COM 1 23 96 2875 DOUGLAS J. MALAM 210239 184.70
COM 1 23 96 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 210240 59.57
COM 1 23 96 2930 JENNIFER T. MCCARTY 210241 182..28
COM 1 23 96 2940 RYAN W. MCDONALD 210242 171..54
COM 1 23 96 3000 THERESA L. NAAB 210243 712..95
COM 1 23 96 3050 ERIK NEWBERG 210244 96..97
COM 1 23 96 3100 LAWRENCE A.. NICCUM 210245 1011.92
COM 1 23 96 3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN 210246 848.43
COM 1 23 96 3500 JOSEPH E. PAZANDAK 210247 1058.54
COM 1 23 96 3534 CHRISTOPHER E.. PETERSON 210248 69..41
COM 1 23 96 3590 JOSEPH A. PRE HALL 210249 110.82
COM 1 23 96 3592 SAMUEL D. PREHALL 210250 50.79
COM 1 23 96 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 210251 1016.88
COM 1 23 96 3660 JEANNETTE M. RIESSELMAN 210252 194.27
COM 1 23 96 3675 SUSAN M. RINEHIMER 210253 34.63
COM 1 23 96 3690 EMILY G. ROBINSON 210254 176.65
COM 1 23 96 3701 BRIAN M.. ROERICK 210255 135.52
COM 1 23 96 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 210256 1153..26
COM 1 23 96 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 210257 417.36
COM 1 23 96 4500 KRISTI STOVER 210258 184.70
COM .1 23 96 4550 MATTHEIAl G. STRAND 210259 84.08
COM 1 23 96 4575 REBECCA A. TARVIN 210260 305.61
Page 7
<t_ Ci
C H E C K R E G I S T E R
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK
TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT
COM 2 06 96 77 DERAK R. ANDING 210267 257.16
COM 2 06 96 101 SCOTT M. BARTLETT 210268 75.36
COM 2 06 96 110 CONNIE D. BASTYR 210269 362.18
COM 2 06 96 115 LAWRENCE A. BROWN 210270 1183.53
COM 2 06 96 345 PATRICK C. CRETAN 210271 124.45
COM 2 06 96 375 JODI A. DALLMAN 210272 84.95
COM 2 06 96 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 210273 673.64
COM 2 06 96 775 JAMES C.. EAKINS 210274 676.36
COM 2 06 96 1001 JOHN M. FRUTH 210275 75.46
COM 2 06 96 .1.105 KERI ANNE GRAF 210276 66.50
COM 2 06 96 .1175 ALAN S HASKINS 210277 84.95
COM 2 06 96 .1.190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 210278 6.12.02
COM 2 06 96 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 210279 570..19
COM 2 06 96 1415 SHAWN D.. HEMPEL 210280 46..87
COM 2 06 96 1550 JAMES C. HURM 210281 2167.65
. COM ,... 06 96 1601 BRIAN D. .J AKEL 210282 107.36
.L
COM :2 06 96 1700 JEFFREY A. JENSEN 210283 1130.73
COM 2 06 96 1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON 210284 798..43
COM 2 06 96 1940 LOREN A.. JONES 210285 92.09
COM 2 06 96 .1950 MARTIN L. JONES 210286 64.68
COM 2 06 96 2100 WILLIAM F.. .JOSEPHSON 210287 632.56
COM 2 06 96 22.12 MARY BETH KNOPIK 210288 83.11
COM 2 06 96 2350 STEVE E. KUCERA 210289 92.07
COM 2 06 96 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 210290 615.17
COM 2 06 96 2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOWSKI 210291. 10.14.12
COM ~ 06 96 28.10 KARENA M. LUl'mBY 2.10292 121..91
.t:-
COM 2 06 96 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 2.10293 50.49
COM '2 06 96 2905 PAUL S. MARSO 21.0294 47..10
COM 2 06 96 3000 THERESA L_ NAA8 210295 712.95
COM r:> 06 96 3050 ERIK NEWBERG 2.10296 122.48
....
COM 2 06 96 3100 LAWRENCE AM NICCUM 21.0297 944.78
. COM 2 06 96 3400 BRADLEY .J .. NIELSEN 2.10298 848.43
COM 2 06 96 3500 JOSEPH E. PAZANDAK 21.0299 1058.54
COM 2 06 96 3534 CHRISTOPHER E. PETERSON 210300 88.83
COM 2 06 96 3590 JOSEPH A. PREHALL 21.0301 177.61
COM 2 06 96 3592 SAMUEL D. PRE HALL 210302 .104..13
COM ~ 06 96 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 210303 997.50
..:.
COM 2 06 96 3660 JEANNETTE M. RIESSELMAN 21.0304 18_01
COM ~ 06 96 3675 SUSAN M. RINEHIMER 210305 34.63
.<:.
COM 2 06 96 3690 EMILY G. ROBINSON 210306 91..42
COM ,.,. 06 96 3701 BRIAN M. ROERICK 210307 59.04
L
COM ,., 06 96 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 2.10308 1153.26
,:;.
COM 2: 06 96 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 210309. 417.36
COM 2 06 96 3910 R CONRAD SCHMID 2103.10 29.54
COM 2 06 96 4190 DANA G_ SHAW 210311 15.24
C011 :2 06 96 4575 REBECCA f:'i .. TAF<VIN 2.10312 360.87
COM 2 06 96 4600 BEVERLY J. VON FELDT 2103.13 587.65
COM ,... 06 96 4750 RALPH A. 'NEHLE 21.03.14 679.39
L
COM 2 06 96 5000 DONALD E. ZDRAZIL 21.0315 1377.83
****TOT:;L~3****
21790.58
Page 9
...~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1996
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Borkon called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Borkon; Commissioners Foust, Kolstad, Lizee, Pisula, Rosenberger and
Turgeon; Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, Malam (arrived at 7:37 p.m.),
McCarty (arrived at 7:12 p.m.), and Stover; City Engineer Brown, City
Administrator Hurm, Planning Director Nielsen, and Finance Director Rolek.
None.
Absent:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Turgeon moved, Pisula seconded to approve January 2, 1996 Commission
meeting minutes as amended on page 3, Paragraph 5, Line 3 after "Glenwood"
insert ", Colorado" and on Page 8, Paragraph 8, Line 1 replace "Debra" with
"Deborah". Motion passed 6 ayes I 1 abstention (Commissioner Rosenberger
abstained as he was not present at the January 2, 1996 meeting).
1. JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL
A. 20 Year City Water Plan
City Engineer Brown outlined the three phases of the Io-year water plan of the Comprehensive
Plan. He noted that although the Implementation Plan for Water Distribution System
Improvements was a 20 year plan, it is consistent with the objectives and phases of the
Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the water plan is to install the key areas in the first 10 years
and incorporate the remainder in the next 10 years. The fIrst phase of implementation begins in
1996. The primary goal of this phase is to provide interconnections between the Boulder Bridge
and Badger Field systems.
Councilmember McCarty arrived at 7: 12 p.m.
Chair Borkon asked the amount of the water assessment. Planning Director Nielsen stated a water
assessment of $5,000.00 would be charged as water becomes available. City Administrator Hurm
noted this amount may change due to an inflation adjustment as noted in the ordinance. He
indicated the cost analysis provided does not account for inflation. Chair Borkon suggested that
fact be noted with an asterisk at the bottom of the analysis.
Chair Borkon noted the Implementation Plan for Water Distribution System Improvements was
very consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and thanked the City staff and City Council for all
their efforts.
Commissioner Rosenberger expressed concerns that residents would have to pay for water
assessments and street assessments. Hurm noted there are no special street assessments included
in the Capital Improvement Plan.
Brown noted the Water Plan will be a. fluid and dynamic document. It may be adjusted after
evaluating street conditions, as a result of failing wells, or due to residents response.
,,-.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 16, 1996 - PAGE 2
Councilmember Malam arrived at 7:37 p.rn.
Commissioner Rosenberger congratulated City Council and City staff for their efforts on the Water
Plan.
B. Capital Improvements Plan
Hurm explained the Street section of the Capital Improvement Plan, noting there would be no
special street assessments. He noted the tax revenues returned to the City upon the end of the
Shorewood Tax Increment Finance District should be, at least partially, designated for the street
reconstruction fund.
Brown explained the MSA street reconstruction needs of the next five years and how they would
be funded. He explained the two local projects included in the Local Streets section that would be
performed in 1996 were reconstruction of a portion of strawberry Lane and replacement of the
Shady Island Bridge. .
Brown explained the two projects included in the Stormwater Management section included Glen
Road and Grant-Lorenz. Brown noted that the City staff routinely receives complaints from areas
which never seem to be resolved. The residents would like the City to have a pro-active plan. The
City has developed a fund to resolve some of these high priority problems within the next few
years as part of the Capital Improvement Plan.
Mayor Bean noted it would be helpful to include a list in this packet which qualifies the recurring
problems and their priority.
Hunn stated he was on a Technical Advisory Committee which was established by a Task Force of
the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). The Committee recommended the
MCES offer a grantfmcentive program to help cities reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration
(1&1) in the sanitary sewer system and also that the MCES work with cities to help them identify
their problems, derive a plan and implement constructive ways to reduce the 1&1. It appears the
MCES looked favorably upon this.
Brown explained the Badger Well Building was included in the Public Facilities and Office
Equipment section. With the implementation of the connection the Boulder Bridge and Badger
Field systems, a smaller building can be utilized. Staff is looking to dispose of a good portion of
the existing building.
Hurm noted the Southshore Senior/Community Center and the relocation of the hockey rink were
also included in this section. A typographic error was noted in the chart on page 26. Amount in
the PurchaseslExpenditures and Interest Income lines need to be reversed.
It was noted a narrative should be included on page 25 addressing the efforts to improve the video
and audio system in the Council Chambers.
Hurm explained the Park Project Schedule section, noting this was the recommendation of the Park
Commission. He explained the code (L) designated a loan would be made by the City to sports
organizations to make these improvements. This would be paid back over 5 to 7 years and the
funds would be returned to the Park Fund. It was agreed the code (L) should be denoted below
the chart. .
Hurm reported his attendance at a meeting with the Youth Hockey Association. They are
requesting to build a six month, covered, refrigerated ice sheet at Freeman Park.
.~,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 16, 1996 - PAGE 3
Hurm noted that Shorewood has an active Park Foundation. He also noted the Trail section of the
Capital Improvement Plan.
Hurm noted the Unscheduled, Potential Projects section. These projects have been discussed but
are not funded and not included in the Capital Improvement Plan. There was consensus to move
item #2, affordable senior housing to the Public Facilities section of the plan.
Rosenberger moved, Turgeon seconded to recommend City Council adoption 0 f
the Capital Improvement Program and Capital Improvement Budget for the year 0 f
1996 with the previous discussed changes. Motion passed 7/0.
Hurm noted there was a conflict with the second City Council meeting in February. There. is a
possibility it may be moved to February 20, 1996. However, there is a public hearing scheduled
for that meeting. City staff will notify all involved parties when this issue is resolved.
2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Commissioner Turgeon noted the State Legislature is talking of changing the laws protecting
wetlands. Nielsen stated he did not feel this would affect the manner in which Shorewood is
handling the wetland issue.
Commissioner Turgeon asked for clarification of the City Council's desire for the senior housing
ordinance. Councilmember Stover explained the Council would like to see the ordinance more
clearly defined to achieve the goals originally desired. There may even be a different set of
guidelines for senior housing for persons age 62 years and older and senior housing for persons
55-62 years. This could also address the issue of how much the City is willing to contribute or
subsidize to help the developers provide affordable senior housing.
3. REPORTS - None.
Chair Borkon acknowledged the persons present in the audience. She stated she hoped they had
received answers to any questions they might have had. She urged them to contact the
Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners or City staff if they had any further questions.
Chair Borkon thanked City staff and Councilmembers for attending the meeting and for their
helpful input.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Pisula moved, Rosenberger seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:14 p.m. Motion
passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUB~ITTED,
Lorn L. Kopischke
Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial