012395 CC Reg AgP
,. I'
,
.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
Following adjournment of the regular meeting the Council will meet in
Work Session fonnat. No action will be taken at this time.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Roll Call
McCarty
Mayor Bean
Stover
Benson
Malam
B. Review Agenda
2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular and Work/Executive Session Minutes
- January 9, 1995 (Att.-#2A Minutes)
B. City Council Work and Executive Session Minutes -
January 10, 1995 (Att.-#2B Minutes)
3 .
CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve
Consent Agenda &: Adopt Resolutions
i tams on
Therein:
A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Allowing Parking Along
East Side of Old Market Road (Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution)
t
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing the 1995
Pay Scale and City'S Contribution Toward Insurance Premium
for City Employees (Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution)
{
C. A Motion to Approve the City Administrator's Employment
Agreement (Att.-#3C Proposed Agreement)
i
t
r
f
D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution of Merit (Att.-#3D
Proposed Resolution)
4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR (Presentations are limited to
3 minutes. No Council action will be taken.)
5 . PARKS
Consideration of an Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 802
(Att.-#5 Proposed Ordinance)
..
&
.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 23, 1995
Page 2 of 2
6 . PLANNING
A. A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact
Approving a Building Moving Permit and Conditional Use
Permit for Accessory Space in Excess of 1,200 Square Feet
(Att.-#6A Planner's Memorandum)
Applicant: James Pennington
Location: 5860 Eureka Road
B. A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact
Approving a Variance to Shoreland District Hardcover
Regulations and a Variance to Expand a Non-Conforming
Structure (Att.-#6B Planner's Memorandum)
Applicant: Gene Gopon
Location: 20645 Radisson Road
C. A Motion to Approve an Extension Regarding Notice to
Remove (Att.-#6Cl Planner's Memorandum; #6C2 Appellant's
Letter)
Appellant: Peter Zucco
Location: 4485 Enchanted Point
7 . DISCUSSION OF POLICY ISSUES
Consideration of a Policy Allowing Staff to Waive Late
Penalties
8 . ADMINISTRATOR &: STAFF REPORTS
A. Report on 1994 Objectives (Att.-#8A Report)
B. Review of Mission Statement and City Values (Att.-
#8B Mission Statement and City Values)
9 . MAYOR &: CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
10. ADJOURN TO WORK SESSION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF
CLAIMS (Att.-#lO)
WORK SESSION
1 . DISCUSSION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ISSUES
2 . ADJOURN
~.
" CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236
EXECUT~VE SUMMARY
SHOREWOOD C~TY COUNC~L MEET~NG
\~:.
MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995
{'.t~~~
;". "~
Fire Chief Dick Mahaffey and Assistant Chief David Hoo will
be -attending the meeting. It might be appropriate right
after reviewing the Agenda Item 1B that Chief Mahaffey be
asked to corne to the microphone and introduce himself and his
assistant to Shorewood residents.
.;
: ;
. ..
,
" . j
.... ".f
,."I~f
4'. ..io
.~!~
:(}j
"'t
:' ..J
t.. : ,,'
. 1
'.., .1
Aaenda Item #3A: Included in the packet are copies of
resolutions which give a history of this issue. It was the
intention of the City Council once the off-street trail was
placed on Old Market Road that parking be allowed on the "east
side of that road. This resolution does that.
, ,
.f
.1
Aaenda Item #3B: This resolution establishes a 1995 pay
scale for City employees and contribution toward insurance
premiums in concurrence with wishes of the City Council.
. . "1
~.
Aaenda Item #3C: This is the annual employment agreement
with the City Administrator.
"Aaenda Item #3D: This resolution authorizes a merit payment
to the City Administrator following a performance review for
the year 1994.
Aaenda Item #5: In reviewing our City codes we have noticed
that upon restricting the hours of snowmobile use between the
hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. that there were several
sections of the code which these restrictions were not
placed. This ordinance would simply clean up the code,
making each reference consistent.
Aaenda Item #6A: Mr. Pennington proposes to build a detached
garage on his property at 5860 Eureka Road which, when
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
.;
...
.
..
combined with his existing attached garage, exceeds 1200
square feet of area. The staff and Planning Commission
recommend approval of the conditional use permit. The
Council should direct staff to prepare a findings of fact for
the next meeting. Approval requires a four-fifths vote.
Aaenda Item #6B: Mr. Gopon proposes to significantly remodel
the home at 20645 Radisson Road, requiring variances to hard
surface limitations and to expand a nonconforming building.
The staff and Planning Commission recommend approval subject
to a number of conditions, one of which is that the upper
level can not extend into the front setback. The Council
should direct staff to prepare a findings of fact for the
next meeting. Approval requires a four-fifths vote.
Aaenda Item #6C: Mr. Zucco asks for additional time to
correct code violations at 4485 Enchanted Point, but does not
specify how much time he needs. Staff recommends extending
the deadline to 23 February for all items except a large
boat, which should be removed by 15 May 1995.
Aaenda Item #7: In the packet you will find a memorandum
from the Finance Director. This is a draft of a policy which
we want to bring to the City Council for discussion and
further direction before a final policy is brought to you.
Aaenda Item #8A & B: These items were held over to this
meeting from the last Council meeting because of time
constraints. The City's mission and values should be
reviewed publicly. The final report on the 1994 objectives
is again enclosed in the packet. Please feel free to call
before the meeting if there are questions or concerns.
Following the regular City Council meeting we will meet in
work session format to discuss any items concerning the
Comprehensive Plan and its presentation at the upcoming
neighborhood meetings.
~,
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 1995
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
6:30 PM
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
1. Mayor Bean opened the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Present: Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, Stover, McCarty and
Malam; and Administrator Hurm
Discussion - Commission Appointments
The City Council discussed the various appointments which are to be made at the City Council
meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m.
2. ADJOURN
There being no further business, the work session was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
James C. Hurm,
City Administrator
ATfEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
;;(A
,Y
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDA Y, JANUARY 9, 1995
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE
City Administrator Hurm administered the Oath of Office to Robert B. Bean as Mayor and to
Jennifer McCarty and Douglas Malam as Councilmembers.
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Bean called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
A.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, Malam, McCarty, and Stover;
Administrator Hurm, City Attorney Keane, and Planning Director Nielsen.
Review Agenda
.
B.
Mayor Bean clarified that a public hearing regarding senior housing is not scheduled at this
meeting, howeverthe Council will consider a related matter, but will not take action. Bean noted
that agenda item "Matters from the Floor" will henceforth appear near the beginning of the Council
agenda for the convenience of the public. .
Stover moved, McCarty seconded to approve the agenda for January 9, 1995.
Motion passed 5/0.
C. Mayor's Presentation of Council Commitments
Mayor Bean presented and read the role and commitments of the Councilmembers to be signed and
reaffIrmed annually during the term of each member.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
.
A.
City Council Regular and Executive Session Minutes - December 12, 1994
Stover moved, Benson seconded to approve the Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes of December 12, 1994, with deletion of the word: "additional" on page 2,
paragraph 7, line 4. Motion passed 2/0. Bean, Malam, and McCarty abstained.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to approve the Executive Session Minutes of
December 12, 1994. Motion passed 2/0. Bean, Malam, and McCarty abstained.
B. City Council Regular Minutes - December 19, 1994
Benson moved, Stover seconded to approve the Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes of December 19, 1994. Motion passed 2/0. Bean, Malam, and McCarty
abstained.
3. MOTION ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS MAKING APPOINTMENTS
WITHIN THE CITY FOR THE YEAR 1995
"t,
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 2
A. A Resolution Making Appointments for 1995
Mayor Bean read Resolution No. 95-1 appointing persons to certain offices and positions within
the City of Shorewood for the year 1995.
McCarty moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 95-1, "A
Resolution Making Appointments to Certain Offices and Positions Within the City
of Shorewood for the Year 1995." Motion passed 5/0.
B. A Resolution Making Appointments to Various Commissions to Begin in 1995
Mayor Bean read Resolution No. 95-2 appointing persons to the Park and Planning Commissions
and appointing the Chair and Vice Chair for the year 1995 for each Commission. Candidates are
invited to apply for 2 open positions on the Planning Commission.
McCarty moved, Malam seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 95-2, "A
Resolution Making Commission Appointments." Motion passed 5/0.
4.
CONSENT AGENDA
.
Mayor Bean read the Consent Agenda for January 9, 1995.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to approve the Motions on the Consent Agenda
and to adopt the Resolutions therein:
A. Motion to Approve Change Order #3 for Project #PK-4-94, Silverwood
Park Improvements
B. RESOLUTION NO. 95-3, "A Resolution Accepting Silverwood Park
Improvements, Project No. 94-4, and Authorizing Final Payment."
C. RESOLUTION NO. 95-4, "A Resolution Approving Licenses for Tree
Trimmer." RESOLUTION NO. 95-5, "A Resolution Approving Licenses
for Refuse Collectors."
D.
.
Motion to Approve a Water System Analysis Agreement with Orr-Schelen-
Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-6, "A Resolution Accepting Streets, Sanitary Sewer
and Storm Sewer in the Plat of Boulder Ridge Estates."
Motion passed 5/0.
E.
5. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None.
6 . PARKS - Report by Representative
McCarty reported on actions taken by the Park Commission as detailed in the Commission's
December 13, 1994 meeting minutes.
7. PLANNING - Report by Representative
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 3
Commissioner Turgeon reported on actions taken by the Commission and its Study Session
discussion at the January 3, 1995 meeting. The Commission scheduled neighborhood meetings on
the Comprehensive Plan update for January 30-31 and February 6-7, 1995.
A. A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact for a Setback Variance.
Applicant: John Grable. Location: 4720 Bayswater Road.
Nielsen reviewed the applicant's request for a setback variance to construct a deck which
encroaches into the 50' perimeter setback of the Amesbury West plat and partially encroaches into
the common area of the planned unit development (detailed in his December 1, 1994
memorandum.) The Planning Commission and staff recommend denial of the application because
a deck can be built without encroachment, the request fails to meet the criteria for a variance, and a
building permit was previously approved on the basis of construction of a conforming deck.
Nielsen noted that additional information submitted by the applicant has not been reviewed by the
staff or Commission.
.
Mr. John Grable, 4720 Bayswater Road, read and distributed a copy of his letter dated January 9,
1995, detailing his position and requesting a building permit for construction of the deck. He
believes the Amesbury West covenants allow addition of the 6' x 10' deck as proposed, a variance
is not required, the proposal is consistent with the City's ordinances, and similar extensions into
the Amesbury common area were granted by the City over the past 21 years. Grable circulated
photographs of homes in the Amesbury and Amesbury West developments with similarly
constructed extensions into the common area without variances required.
.
Nielsen stated the 50' perimeter setback should be maintained. He reviewed the controversy
between the staff and the developer of the P.U.D regarding allowable encroachments into common
areas. Details of the City's position and interpretation are stated in Nielsen's letter of October 31,
1990 to Mr. James McNulty, the developer. Because the development's covenants are vague and
reasonable encroachment limits into the common area are not specified, the developer was notified
that the zoning ordinance provisions will be the enforcement tool applied to this development until
such time that the covenants are amended to provide clarification and specificity. Nielsen noted
that the City Attorney supports the City's position in this matter.
The Councilmembers discussed the matter and reviewed the photographs submitted. Malam
inquired whether other apparent encroachments were brought before the City. Nielsen indicated a
review has not been conducted, however, he recalled that 2 applications were subsequently
withdrawn before action was required. The staff is not aware of any encroachments into the 50'
perimeter setback. Stover stated that without schematic drawings and detailed information on lot
lines, footprint, etc., it is difficult to determine from the photographs whether encroachments into
the common area exist. She assumed that building permits were issued on the basis that variances
were not required.
Stover pointed out that a hardship for reasonable use of the property does not exist. Mr. Grable
explained that as construction began based on the plan submitted with the building permit request,
a visual review of the development revealed existing decks built exactly as he originally desired.
He noted that a modification was agreed upon at the Planning Commission level with respect to the
perimeter setback and the remaining issue is the encroachment into the common area which is
allowed by the development's covenants.
The Council was concerned that construction commenced on a deck that did not conform to the
plans submitted with the building request. In addition, while the developer acknowledged that
some ambiguities exist, action has not been taken by the developer in response to the October 31,
1990 letter stating the City's position and interpretation.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 4
The Council agreed to refer the issue back to the Planning Commission and directed the staff to
determine what the actual setbacks are based on the property identified with the information
presented to determine to what extent variances should have been obtained and have not been
obtained and re-evaluate the request in light of the overall development with specific reference to
this property, along with surveys or additional data from the original plans for this development.
Benson moved, McCarty seconded to table to March 27, 1995 consideration and
action on the setback variance request of John Grable, 4720 Bayswater Road.
Motion passed 5/0.
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat for Jaeger Addition.
Applicant: Abingdon Development Corporation. Location: 25655 Smithtown Road and
25725 Eureka Way
Nielsen explained that Abingdon Development Corporation's 7-10t Smithtown Meadows plat is
delayed by the development moratorium. The corporation requests that 2 lots with existing homes
be platted separately as Jaeger Addition, leaving the remainder as an outlot for future development. .
This platting allows completion of the sale of the home on lot 2 currently being rented by the
purchaser and removal of the substandard home on lot 1. The platting does not circumvent the
current development moratorium. Nielsen noted that some residents were concerned regarding
access to the northly lot. The development agreement will provide that a home designed for that lot
would initially access Eureka Way, but would ultimately switch to the new road that will be built.
Nielsen stated staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat
subject to preparation of a development agreement addressing future development of the outlot,
street, and utilities.
Mr. Charles Dillerud, representing Abingdon Development Corporation, had no additional
comments on the application.
Malam moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 95-7, "A Resolution
Granting Preliminary Plat Approval for Jaeger Addition." Motion passed 5/0.
C.
A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Final Plat for Jaeger Addition. Applicant:
Abingdon Development Corporation. Location: 25655 Smithtown Road and 25725
Eureka Way.
Nielsen explained that City Code does not preclude a developer from requesting final plat approval
at the same time as the preliminary plat review. Since neither staff nor the Planning Commission
recommended any change to the Jaeger Addition preliminary plat, Nielsen recommended approval
of the final plat subject to the developer entering into the standard development agreement to
address future development of the outlot.
.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 95-8, "A
Resolution Approving a Final Plat for Jaeger Addition." Motion passed 5/0.
D. A Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare Findings of Fact for a Conditional Use Permit for
Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet. Applicant: Steven Simon. Location:
26710 Edgewood Road.
Nielsen stated the staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the applicant's request
for a conditional use permit for accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet, subject to certain
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 5
conditions, in connection with a significant remodeling of an existing home and outbuildings on
the property (detailed in Nielsen's 12-01-94 memorandum).
Mr. Bill Brueggeman, contractor representing Mr. Simon, had no additional comments regarding
the application.
Stover moved, Malam seconded to direct the staff to prepare a Findings of Fact to
approve a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square
Feet for Steven Simon, 26710 Edgewood Road. Motion passed 5/0.
E. A Motion to Approve an Extension of Time to Comply with a Notice to Remove.
Appellant: Paul Harrington. Location: 5480 Wedgewood Drive.
Nielsen stated Mr. Harrington has corrected all but 1 violation to bring his property into
compliance (detailed in Nielsen's 01-05-95 memorandum). He recommended approval of the
appellant's request for an extension to May 15 for removal of a pontoon boat (detailed in
Harrington's letter dated December 19, 1994).
. Mr. Paul Harrington explained that the pontoon boat on blocks is under repair and cannot be
moved without damaging the boat; however repair and removal from the property will be
completed by May 1995.
.
McCarty moved, Benson seconded to approve extension, to May 15, 1995, of a
deadline to comply with a 12-09-94 Notice to Remove, for Paul S. Harrington,
5480 Wedge wood Road. Motion passed 5/0.
F. A Motion to Approve a Sign Permit for the Waterford Shopping Center. Applicant: ldenti-
Graphics for Career Cleaners. Location: 19905 State Highway 7.
Nielsen stated the sign proposed by ldenti-Graphics on behalf of Career Cleaners is consistent with
a previously approved overall signage plan for the Waterford Shopping Center, therefore approval
of the sign permit is recommended.
Stover moved, Malam seconded to approve a sign permit for Identi-Graphics, on
behalf of Career Cleaners, for the Waterford Shopping Center, 19905 State
Highway 7. Motion passed 5/0.
The Council agreed that approval of subsequent sign permit requests for the Waterford Shopping
Center be placed on the Consent Agenda for action.
G. Request for Clarification of Allowable Use of Bank Site - Waterford Shopping Center
Nielsen explained that plans are being developed by the First State Bank of Excelsior for
construction of a new banking facility at the Waterford Shopping Center on a commercial pad
previously approved for such use under the Waterford P.U.D. Design of the building includes a
second story to accommodate the bank's future growth. One-half of the second story will be rented
out as office space until it is needed by the bank. Staff has taken a narrow interpretation of the
Waterford p.u.d. which provides a separate site for an office building. Staff requests the
Council's determination as to whether using one-half of the second floor as office space until
needed by the bank is a substantial departure from the Waterford p.u.d. agreement. A substantial
deviation requires a public hearing to amend the existing plan.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 6
Following discussion, the Council concluded that both uses, office and banking, are clearly within
the uses approved for the Waterford commercial sites, therefore, the proposal to construct a
banking facility with some second floor rental office space at the Waterford Shopping Center
should proceed through the customary site plan review process.
H. Consideration of Peter Boyer's Request to Reduce Age Restriction for Seasons
Development
Mayor Bean explained that consideration of this agenda item does not include a formal public
hearing, however public testimony will be heard and the Council will discuss and provide direction
to the staff, but specific action will not be taken with respect to Mr. Boyer's request to reduce the
age restriction for occupancy from 62 years to 55 years of age at The Seasons development.
Nielsen noted that while Mr. Boyer indicated additional information would be provided relative to
his request, none has been received therefore the staff has no comments at this time.
Mr. Peter Boyer, developer of The Seasons senior housing development, made a presentation
supporting his request to reduce the age limit for occupancy at The Seasons from 62 to 55 years of .
age. Details are included in his December 22, 1994 letter to the City of Shorewood and 2 undated
documents distributed at the Council meeting. One document describes how The Seasons qualifies
for the age 55 exemption under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the other lists 8 reasons that
seniors have given as to why the age limit should be lowered.
Mayor Bean recessed the meeting at 9 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.m. The Council heard public
testimony as follows.
Faye Smith, 5283 St. Albans Bay Circle, stated she moved to Shorewood to take advantage of
owning a one-level home; supported reducing the age limit to 55 to provide fresh ideas and to
provide opportunity for more senior citizens.
Larry Buesgens, 20090 Excelsior Boulevard, resides north of the Seasons development. He
requested that other related matters be considered in the context of Mr. Boyer's request to lower the
age limitation in the development. These include: berm height running parallel with Highway 7,
street lighting, location of the entrance to Excelsior Boulevard, wetland on the property, soil
erosion, silt flow into Footprint Lake, damage to Excelsior Boulevard from construction vehicles, .
and the one and one-half story construction.
Bernard Miller, 5296 St. Albans Bay Circle, explained he looked a long time for housing such as
The Seasons, was one of the first buyers in the development, and is happy with the unit. He
strongly supported lowering the age requirement to 55 years to allow more persons to take
advantage of the accommodations.
Robert Rascop, 4560 Enchanted Point, stated he is 53 years old, his wife has serious health
problems that require I-level housing, and they wish to remain in Shorewood. Having looked for
I-level housing for some time, Rascop stated single level homes are difficult to find and requested
the Seasons' age limit be reduced to 55 years of age.
MaIjorie Fleishhacker, 5252 Spring Circle, requested clarification as to why the age limit was set at
62 years when age 55, and even 50, is recognized as a senior, and the development is identified as
"senior" housing.
.
.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 7
Joe Boyer, Deephaven, commented that the area is not a wetland, but a flooded area damaged by
water from Highway 7 and a broken culvert which destroyed trees, etc. Repairs and other work
done in connection with Pete Boyer's construction of The Seasons will improve and restore the
area.
During discussion, Council was skeptical about changing the rules of the development given the
accommodations made by the City to enhance construction of this project. Density of the location
was re-zoned, park and utility fees were waived, and costs related to drainage problems were
mitigated by MNDot and the City of Shorewood. Nonetheless, the Council reiterated the City's
commitment to providing economical senior housing in Shorewood. The Council agreed that
clarification of an interpretation of the Federal Fair Housing Act be researched by the legal staff in
conjunction with Mr. Boyer and HUD to determine its applicability to The Seasons, for future
consideration by the Council.
I. Clarification of Sign Permit Approval for Video Update/W aterford Shopping Center
Nielsen explained that previous Council approval of a sign permit for the Video Up<iate store at the
Waterford Shopping Center allowed the applicant to paint stripes on the sign band. The applicant
prefers to install a colored aluminum stripe which is considered to be an extension of the sign but
would exceed the allowable sign length. The Council also discussed requiring all tenants to stripe
if one tenant did. The proposed aluminum stripe is not consistent with the previously approved
plans. Painting a stripe is not specifically precluded, however, Nielsen recommended it not be
allowed because it is inconsistent with other tenant signage.
Stover reviewed the Council's November 29 discussion of this issue. She preferred no striping to
provide a cleaner overall look. Benson stated the Council ought not to be in the business of
designing signs and recalled that the possibility of including striping in all tenants' signs was only
a part of the Council's discussion, but was not made a part of its action.
Mr. Dave Fredrickson, representing Video Update, stated he understood a stripe was acceptable,
therefore began production on a sign with a stripe. Upon receipt of the sign permit, he discovered
that striping was not allowed. At this time, he believes the question to be what type of striping best
suits the location. He believes colored aluminum striping is preferred for its low maintenance
qualities.
Bean stated it appears that striping was approved and a non-lighted stripe of clad aluminum would
appear to be acceptable. Benson explained his dislike for the striping, thought the overall signage
plan to be restrictive, and preferred some continuity in the signage. Stover acknowledged the
lower maintenance aspect of the aluminum stripe, but reiterated a preference for no striping.
Malam moved, Benson seconded to allow Video Update to include a non-lighted
stripe of a material of their choosing (preferably clad aluminum) on its sign band
at the Waterford Shopping Center. Motion passed 4/1. Stover voted nay.
8. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO WAIVE LATE FEE
Hurm referred to Finance Director Rolek's January 5, 1995 memorandum regarding a resident's
request for removal of late penalties assessed the utility bill. It is recommended that the late penalty
of $8.10, assessed to the account because an honest mistake caused an underpayment of 1994 3rd
quarter utility charges, be forgiven.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
January 9, 1995 - PAGE 8
McCarty moved, Stover seconded to waive an $8.10 late penalty assessed on the
3rd quarter, 1994 utility bill of Roxanne Lenarz, 5740-42 Wood Duck Circle.
Motion passed 5/0.
The Council agreed to change its policy to authorize the Financial Director discretion to act on
behalf of the Council to waive penalties on utility accounts under an amount to be determined by
the staff. The policy change details will be prepared by staff for the Council's review.
9. CONSIDERA TION OF A MOTION TO POSTPONE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
DRUG TESTING POLICY
Hurm requested action to change the effective date of the previously approved drug testing policy
for the Public Works Department to January 1, 1996 to conform with the effective date under
Federal regulations.
Benson moved, Malam seconded to change the effective date of the Drug Testing
Policy for the City's Public Works Department to January 1, 1996. Motion
passed 5/0.
10. DISCUSSION OF POLICY ISSUES
.
A. Report on 1994 Objectives
B . Review of Mission Statement and City Values
Hurm directed the Council's attention to the document reporting the status of 1994 objectives and
the Mission Statement and City Values. The Council agreed to re-schedule consideration of these
issues to the Council's next meeting.
11. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS
Hurm explained the purpose of the Council's role as the Board of Review and suggested that a date
for its annual meeting be determined. The Council set the Board of Review meeting for 7 p.m.,
Wednesday, AprilS, 1995.
12.
MA YOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
.
Mayor Bean stated information about the scheduled meetings on the Comprehensive Plan update
will be disseminated. He encouraged the public to attend the meetings.
13. ADJOURN TO WORK SESSION FORMAT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF
CLAIMS
McCarty moved, Benson seconded to adjourn the City Council meeting at 10:00
p.m. to a work session format, subject to approval of claims. Motion passed 5/0.
Following this meeting, the Council met jointly with the Planning Commission to consider the
Comprehensive PIal! Update.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDA Y, JANUARY 9, 1995
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
10:10 P.M.
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
Mayor Bean convened the joint work session with the Planning Commission at 10: 10 p.m.
Present:
Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, McCarty, Malam, and Stover; Planning
Commissioners Foust, Rosenberger, and Turgeon; City Administrator Hurm and
Planning Director Nielsen.
1. DISCUSSION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES
Nielsen stated that 4 completed chapters of the Comprehensive Plan Update as drafted by the
Planning Commission have been distributed. At this meeting, the Council is requested to review
the Natural Resources section. Nielsen reviewed the Natural Resources Chapter summary dated
1/95 including the City's goal and objectives and policies. The Council reviewed the Wetlands and
Shorelands map included in this Chapter. Nielsen and the Planning Commissioners provided
clarification and responded to questions. The Councilmembers accepted the Natural Resources
Chapter as presented.
The Council, Commissioners, and staff participated in a discussion regarding the current status of
the City's water system and concerns related to provision water for the pending new developments
in the City. The Council expressed general support of the 10-year plan proposed for City water to
be included in the Community Facilities Section of the Comprehensive Plan and acknowledged that
specific details and policies must be developed to accomplish the plan.
.
2. ADJOURN
Benson moved, Malam. seconded to adjourn the work session at 11:28 p.m. .
Motion passed 5/0.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED,
.
Arlene H. Bergfalk, Recording Secretary, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
ROBERTJ. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
TUESDA Y, JANUARY 10, 1995
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 PM
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
1. Mayor Bean opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor Bean; Councilmembers Benson, Stover, McCarty and
Malam; and Administrator Hurm
Presentation - Wage & Salmy Chart/Comparable Worth Regulations
There was a presentation by the City Administrator and discussion on the following items:
Wage and Salary Chart/Comparable Worth regulations
Stanton Salary Survey
Evaluation Format
Chain of Command
Grievance Procedure
Employee Relationship Policy
Contract with AFSCME Union
Engineer/Public W orIes Director Position
Merit System Report
Management Action Plan
At 9:00 p.m. the City Council met in Executive Session. Administrator Hurm left the room.
Following discussion of the Administrator's performance in Executive Session, the Council opened the
meeting back to Work Session format. Administrator Hurm joined them. The City Council discussed
with the Administrator his performance review. Following this discussion, the Administrator's
employment agreement was discussed. The Mayor will work with the City Attorney in updating the
language of the employment agreement.
. 2. ADJOURN
.
There being no further business, Benson moved, Malam seconded, to adjourn the meeting at
10:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED.
James C. Hurm,
City Administrator
ATTEST:
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
~~
'#
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 95-_
A RESOLUTION ALLOWING PARKING
ON THE EAST SIDE OF OLD MARKET ROAD
WHEREAS, Resolution #8-92 designates a portion of Old Market Road
as official bicycle lane; and
WHEREAS, Resolution #9-92 designates a safe speed limit of 25 miles per hour
on Old Market Road; and
.
WHEREAS, Resolution #60-92 authorizes the placement of "No Parking" signs
on both sides of Old Market Road; and
WHEREAS, an off-street trail has now been placed on the east side of Old Market
Road making designation of the outer six feet of the east lane of Old Market Road as a
bicycle lane unnecessary.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 160.263, the City of Shorewood hereby
designates the outer six feet, of the west lane only, of Old Market Road from Covington
Road to Brom's Boulevard as a bicycle lane.
2. The Public Works Department is directed to remove bicycle lane and "No
Parking" signs on the east side of Old Market Road and to verify that signage is installed on
the west side of Old Market Road in accordance with the City Engineer's report on
markings and signage as ordered in Resolution #8-92.
3 . These traffic regulations shall become effective at the time of the removal of
said signage.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHOREWOOD this 23rd day of January, 1995.
ROBERT B. BEAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
o~
.
.
I
RESOLUTION NO. 60 - 92
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TIffi PLACEMENT OF
"NO PARKING" SIGNS ON OLD MARKET ROAD
BETWEEN COVINGTON ROAD AND T.H. 7
WHEREAS, Shorewood City Code Section 801.01 adopts provisions of the
Minnesota State Traffic Code, M.S. Chapter 169 (as amended), which Chapter provides
that local authorities may place and maintain such traffic control devices upon highways
under their jurisdiction as they deem necessary to regulate, warn, or guide traffic; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has designated Old Market Road between
covington Road and T.H. 7 as an official bicycle route; and
WHEREAS, the Council has made a determination that such traffic control
devices are necessary on both sides of Old Market Road.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That the Public Works Department is hereby directed to erect "No
Parking" signs on both sides of Old Market Road between Covington Road and T.H. 7.
2. That these traffic regulations shall become effective at the time of the
erection of said "No Parking" signs.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 22nd
day of June, 1992.
ATTEST:
~NA- C ~A1'.M
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
y
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes:
Nays:
\
RESOLUTION NO.
9
-92
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A SAFE SPEED LIMIT OF 25 MILES PER HOUR
ON A PORTION OF OLD MARKET ROAD
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is desirous of providing a safe
path for bicycle travel along Old Market Road; and
WHEREAS, there is currently insufficient funding available for
a separate, off-street bicycle path; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes Chapter 160.263, Subd. 4, allows .
for the designation of a safe speed along an established bike lane;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has designated a portion of Old
Market Road as a bike lane.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. Pursuant to M.S. 160.263, Subd. 4, the City of Shorewood
hereby designates a safe speed of 25 miles per hour on
that part of Old Market Road from Covington Road to
Brom's Blvd.
2. Pursuant to M.S. 160.263, Subd. 4, the designated safe
speed shall become effective upon the erection of the
appropriate signs.
.
27th
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, of the City of Shorewood, this
day of Januarv. 1992.
VY\ix1 (
es C. Hurm
y Administrator
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO.
8 -92
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A PORTION OF OLD MARKET ROAD
AS AN OFFICIAL BICYCLE LANE
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is desirous of providing a safe
path for bicycle travel along Old Market Road; and
WHEREAS, there is currently insufficient funding available for
a separate, off-street bicycle path; and
.
WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes Chapter 160.263, allows for the
development and designation of portions of roadways as bicycle
lanes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. Pursuant to M.S. 160.263, the City of Shorewood hereby
designates the outer six (6) feet of each lane of Old
Market Road from covington Road to Brom' s BI vd. as a
Bicycle Lane;
2.
Pursuant to M.S. 160.263, Subd. 3, the city of Shorewood
hereby directs the City Engineer to prepare a report for
marking and signing of the bikeway in conformance with
the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,
and directs the Public Works Department to erect and
construct such markings and signs in accordance with such
report.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, of the City of Shorewood, this
27th day of Januarv. 1992.
VW1
ATTEST:
J-~ .'.~'\ .~' Orr
'~'?. . :....'i ::3-";..... .C~.d';... :'. Schelen
-J '. ?f -', Mayeron &
.,: :A~'~: J -'~ AsSociates, Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Architects
Planners
Surveyors
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECf:
Shorewood Mayor and City Council /-1 t/
Joel Dresel, P.E., L.S., City Engineer / };)V
January 22,1992
Designating Old Market Road as an Official Bike Lane
Attached please find a Resolution designating a portion of Old Market Road as an official
bicycle lane. The passage of this Resolution, along with proper marking and signing along
the roadway will be necessary prior to the designation of a safe speed limit of 25 mph.
We have reviewed the suitability of Old Market Road between Covington Road and Bram's .
Blvd. for bike traffic. Based on the Minnesota Department of Transportation's "Bike-Way
Design Manual", the addition of bike lanes to a 36 foot-wide road would render a service
level of fair to poor rank. In addition, the "Bike-Way Design Manual" recommends bike
lane widths of 8 fee\ with travel in the same direction as adjacent motor vehicle traffic. The
designation of two 8 foot-wide bike paths would leave only 10 foot lanes for the traffic on
Old Market Road, which we believe to be insufficient. Therefore, we recommend the
designation of two 6 foot-wide bicycle paths adjacent to the outer curb lines on Old Market
Road from Covington Road to Brom's Blvd.
As we do have sufficient right-of-way to provide for an off-roadway bike path and sidewalk,
we feel that the ultimate solution should be to move the bike path out of the traveled
roadway. However, given the facts that we do not currently have sufficient funds to
construct off-roadway bike paths and that bicyclists may very well be using Old Market
Road, we believe that the designation of Old Market Road as a bike lane will provide an .
added margin of safety in the interim.
/cmw
o 122cos.m&c
Enclosure
c: Ron Bray, OSM
.
-( . '" r
-r L .t:.~ '
/-) . ~ .
J:2L;f'-i.> 7/~t.L!..J0 MAYOR
Barb Srancel
COUNCI L
K(lsti Stover
Bob Gagne
ROb Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
January 16, 1992
To:
Joel Dresel - City Engineer
.
James C. Hurm - City Administrator I
Old Market Road bike designation and speed limit i / j
V
Attached please find a copy of MS 160.263 Bicycle Lanes and Highways. The City Council
has indicated they would like to see the Old Market Road/Covington Road route posted
25 MPH as quickly as possible. Signs are on order but in the meantime I ask you as City
- Engineer to prepare a report and recommendations on proper bikeway signage, markings
and locations, as well as parking restrictions. The Park Commission indicated the bikeway
should be on the east side of Old Market Road south to its intersection with Covington
Road where the roadway becomes too narrow for an on-street bikeway at this time.
Re:
From:
In addition, although the Council has, by accepting the Task Force recommendations,
lowered the speed limit to 25 MPH, Subd. 4 of MSA 160.263 states such safe speed
designations may be made upon Council resolution or ordinance.
. To keep. the record straight please draft a resolution specifying the on-street bike route on
Old Market Road and a separate resolution designating the Old Market Road/Covington
Road raute 25 MPH for safety reasons. I will then place these two resolutions on the
January 27 consent calendar for adoption. Your attention to detail is appreciated.
Sincerely,
James C. Hurm
City Administrator
cc: Bradley J. Nielsen
vRick Young
Dave Sellergren
Don Zdrazil
JGI/sn
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
. ,- .~..' -
4170
~
:. including
....."ith. dam- -
)werpoles, J
licles mov- f
S9 and acts ~
'.
;s. or along \"
i authority ~
street. The
ty engineer "
.
:;
I:
.gs or struc- ;
"
nypolitical ..
r
such trunk t
..
,
,eer for the ~
:tion of the
In for mov- .
on shall be
:S, or other
1Y building
10 appune. .
,
In until the ..
~en paid or ,
provisions
lite operat-
.~
~6 c 444 t
. i
,
f
the public t
i
lonal vehi- ,
sponation I
r
: esublish-
highways. .
.
:riteria for .
'the lanes, .
;
tall govern
I city pow- ~
1 and may f
o the com- I
:eipt upon
i
is section. J
,
or state or f
lrsU:1nt to t
t
.
..
providing i
;
missioner .
~
resources, ,
"
~ and soil J
4171
ROADS. GE.'lElUL PROvtSIO:-fS 160.264
e:
1
,
l
j
I
i
I
~
resources. The commissioner may cooperate with and enter into agreements with the
United States government, any department of the state of Minnesota, any unit ofIocal
government and any public or private corporation in order to effect the purposes of this
section.
History: 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1973 c 620 s 1; 1975 c 271 s 6; 1976 c 149 s 59; 1976
c 166 s 7; 1981 c 356 s 177.178; 1982 c 424 s 130; 1983 c 289 s 115 subd 1; 1986 c 444.
1987 c 312 art 1 s 26 subd 2; 1987c 358 s 34; 1987 c 384 art 3 s 42 ~
160.263 BICYCLE UNES AND WAYS.
Subdivision 1. [Repealed, 1987 c 255 s l5J
Subd. 2. Powers of political subdivisions. The governing body of any political sub-
division may by ordinance or resolution:
(a) Designate any roadway or shoulder or portion thereof under its jurisdiction as
a bicycle lane or bicycle route.
(b) Designate any sidewalk or portion thereof under its jurisdiction as a bicycle
path provided that the designation does not destroy a pedestrian way or pedestrian
access.
(c) Develop and designate bicycle paths.
(d) Designate as bikeways all bicycle lanes, bicycle routes, and bicycle paths.
Subd. 3. Designation. A governing body designating a bikeway under this section
may:
( 1) designate the type and character of vehicles or other modes of travel which may
be operated on a bikeway, provided that the operation of such vehicle or other mode
of travel is not inconsistent with the safe use and enjoyment of the bikeway by bicycle
traffic;
(2) establish priority of right-of-way on the bicycle lane or bicycle path and other-
wise regulate the use of bikeways as it deems necessary; and
(3) paint lines or construct curbs or establish other physical separations to exclude
the use of the bikeways by vehicles other than those specifically permitted to operate
thereon.
The designating governing body may, after public hearing, prohibit through traffic
on any highway or portion thereof designated as a bicycle lane or bicycle route, except
that through traffic may not be prohibited on a trunk highway. The designating govern-
ing bOdy shall erect and maintain official signs giving notice of the regulations and pri-
orities established under this subdivision and shall mark all bikeways with appropriate
signs. Marking and signing of bikeways by the designating governing body shall be in
conformance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Subd. 4. Speed on street with bicycle lane. Notwithstanding section 169.14, subdi-
vision S, the governing body of any political subdivision, by resolution or ordinance
and without an engineering or traffic investigation, may designate a safe speed for any
street or highway under its authority upon which it has established a bicycle lane; pro-
vided that such safe speed shall not be lower than 25 miles per hour. The ordinance
or resolution designating a safe speed is effective when appropriate signs designating
the speed are erected along the street or highway, as provided by the governing body.
History: 1976 c 199 s 15; 1987 c 255 s 3,4
160.264 REPLACEi\1EJ.'IT OF BIKEWAYS AND PEDE5TRIAL"I( WAYS.
Whenever an existing bikeway, pedestrian way, or roadway used by bicycles or
pedestrians or the sole access to such is destroyed by any new, reconstructed, or relo-
cated federal. state, or local highway, the road authority responsible shall replace the
destroyed facility or access with a comparable facility or access. Replacement is not
required where it would be contrary to public safety or when sparsity of population,
other available ways or other factors indicate an absence of need for such facility or
access.
History: 1976 c 199 s 16; 1987 c 255 s 5
.
.
4
RESOLUTION NO. 95- __
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD' SWAGE &: SALARY
RANGE CHART FOR 1995 AND SETTING THE MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION
TOWARD THE MONTHLY INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City Council has established the current salary and
wage range chart and its current contribution toward the monthly
insurance premiums for City employees by its Resolution No. 94-12; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to, from time to
time, revise such salary and wage range chart and contribution toward
the monthly insurance premiums for City employees within the parameters
of State Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The City of Shorewood' s Salary and Wage Range Chart is
hereby revised for the year 1995 as listed on Exhibit A,
attached to and hereby made a part of this resolution.
2. The City's contribution toward the monthly insurance
premiums for City non-contract employees is hereby set at
$330.00 per month for the year 1995.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective
January 1, 1995.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 23rd
day of January, 1995.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
35
..
CITY OF SHOREWOOO
PAY PLAN /PAY RANGES
1995
CURRENT RANGE
POSITION STEP 2 3 4 5
Exec. SectyJDeputy Clerk 4 28,905 30,711 32,518 34,324 36,131
Receptionist/Secretary 5 20,507 21,789 23,071 24,352 25,634
PIT Clerical 18,171 19,307 20,442 21,578 22,714
Election Clerk 17,306 18,387 19,469 20,550 21,632
Finance DirectorlTreas 5 40,519 43,052 45,584 48,117 50,649
Senior Accounting Clerk 24,825 26,3n 27,928 29,480 31,032
Planning Director 5 38,923 41,356 43,789 46.222 48,654
Building Inspector 5 31,122 33,067 35,012 36,957 38,902
Planning Assistant 5 27,663 29,392 31,121 32,850 34,579 .
Ught Equipment Operator 24,737 26,283 27,829 29,375 30,921
Public Wks Working Foreman 5 27,742 29,476 31,210 32,944 34,678
Public Works Director 5 39,810 42,299 44,787 47,275 49,763
Administrator/Clerk 5 46,115 48,997 51,880 54.762 57,644
Uquor Operations Manager 5 31,666 33,645 35,624 37,603 39,582
Uquor Assistant Manager 5 21,714 23.072 24,429 25,786 27,143
Uquor Clerk 13,245 14,073 14,901 15,729 16,557
NOTES: 1. Step 5 is the nonnal salary/wage cap (TOP). It is based on averages for similar positions .
in cities with similar populations, number of employees, location and job descriptions.
2. Nonnally, an employee would be hired at Step 1 - 80% of the TOP
3. After probation (6 months), an employee would go to Step 2 - 85% of the TOP.
4. After 1 year, an employee would go to Step 3 - 90% of the TOP.
5. After 2 years, an employee would go to Step 4 - 95% of the TOP.
6. After 3 years, an employee would go to Step 5 - 100% of the TOP.
This plan, like the proposed Union contract, would allow us to hire a person at Step 2 if the
person is highly qualified and/or has significant experience and we need to offer a higher wage to
attract them. It should also allow us to offer up to Step 4 after probation for the same reasons.
Employees may move more slowly through the range if not meeting expectations, and the City
should be able to exceed Step 5 for exceptional perfonnance.
.
.
..
AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered this 23rd day of January,
1995, by and between the City of Shorewood, a Minnesota Municipal
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and James C. Hurm,
hereinafter referred to as "Hurm".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue the employment of Hurm
as its City Administrator/Clerk; and
WHEREAS, Hurm desires to continue in the employment of the
City of Shorewood as its City Administrator/Clerk; and
WHEREAS, both parties desire to establish the terms of this
continued employment;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. position. The City of Shorewood agrees to continue to
employ Hurm as its City Administrqtor/Clerk through 1995. Hurm
agrees to devote his full business time and best efforts to the
City, and to engage in no outside business activities without
first having notified the Mayor or Acting Mayor or designated
substitute in the Mayor's absence. Hurm further agrees to perform
the duties of City Administrator/Clerk as set out in the Shorewood
City Code. Additionally, it is understood that Hurm may be
required to perform such other duties as may be required of him by
the City Council from time to time.
2. SALARY. The City agrees to pay Hurm a salary of 558,500
per year beginning January 1, 1995, in equal biweekly
installments, and at such rate thereafter as may be fixed by the
Ci ty Council. The City Council agrees to conduct at least one
performance review of Hurm each year. Hurm's salary will be
reviewed each year in accordance with the salary review of other
City employees and in accordance with the City's comparable worth
plan.
3. DEFERRED COMPENSATION. The City shall execute the
necessary documents and file the required forms with the State to
allow Hurm to continue enrollment in a deferred compensation plan
selected by Hurm and approved by the City Council. The City
agrees to contribute an amount equal to the percentage the City
would otherwise pay to PERA on behalf of Hurm.
4. VACATION, SICK LEAVE AND OTHER LEAVE. Hurm shall accrue
vacation during his period of employment at a rate of 15 days per
calendar year. Other sick leave and leaves shall be treated as
set out in the Employee Relations Handbook.
3~
.
Page Two - Hurm Agreement
5. HOLIDAYS. The City will provide to Hurm the same
standard holidays as enjoyed by other supervisory employees as set
out in the Employee Relations Handbook.
6. INSURANCE. The City will pay a total of $370.00 per
month toward hospital, medical, and other insurance coverage of
Hurm's choice as offered through the City's insurance program.
7. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS. The City agrees to budget and
pay the professional dues and subscriptions for Hurm which are
reasonable and necessary for his continued participation in
national, regional, state and local associations and which are
desirable for his continued growth and advancement and deemed to
be in the best interests of the City. The City agrees to pay for
the cost of active membership in the Excelsior Rotary Club (dues
and meals) .
8. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. The City agrees to budget for
and to pay reasonable travel and subsistence expenses for Hurm to
attend professional meetings and conventions consistent with his
professional development and official duties. Hurm will use good
judgment in his outside activities and will not neglect his
primary duties to the City. The meetings and conventions Hurm may
attend include, but are not limited to, the following:
International City Management Association, League of Minnesota
Cities and Minnesota City Manager's Association Conferences.
Approval and paYment of convention expenses shall be subj ect to
annual budget limitations of the City.
.
The City also agrees to budget for and to pay reasonable
travel and subsistence expenses for Hurm to participate in courses
or seminars that are necessary for his professional growth and
which are deemed by the Council to be in the best interests of the
City.
.
9. TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY. The City may terminate
Hurm at any time, with or without cause. In the event that Hurm
is terminated by the City Council during such time that Hurm is
willing and able to perform the duties of City
Administrator/Clerk, then in that event, the City agrees to pay
Hurm as severance pay a lump sum cash paYment equal to three
months aggregate salary plus one additional week's salary for each
full year of service on the date of termination. All such
severance pay shall be without a matching deferred compensation
paYment. In addition to said severance pay, Hurm shall be paid
for any unused vacation. No compensation shall be given Hurm for
any unused sick leave. However, in the event Hurm is terminated
because of his conviction for a felony or for any illegal act
involving personal gain to himself, then the City shall have no
obligation to pay Hurm the severance payor the unused vacation
pay provided for in this paragraph.
.
.
.
<C
Page Three - Hurm Agreement
In the event Hurm voluntarily resigns his position with the
Ci ty, Hurm agrees to gi ve the Ci ty 30 calendar days advance
notice. In such event. no severance pay shall be paid to Hurm,
however, Hurm shall be paid for any unused vacation pay and sick
leave at the same rate allowed other supervisory employees with
similar longevity.
10. GENERAL EXPENSES. The City recognizes that
reasonable expenses of a non-personal and job affiliated
will be incurred by Hurm. The City agrees to reimburse or
said reasonable expenses, subject to prior Council approval.
certain
nature
to pay
11. HOURS OF WORK. It is understood that the position of
City Administrator/Clerk requires attendance at evening meetings
and occasionally at weekend meetings. It is understood by Hurm
that additional compensation and compensatory time shall not be
paid by the City for any such additional expenditures of time,
except that Hurm may absent himself from the office to a
reasonable extent in consideration of the extraordinary
expenditures of time for evening and weekend meetings held outside
of normal working hours.
12. AUTOMOBILE. Hurm shall use his own automobile for City
business and the City shall reimburse Hurm for the business use of
his personal automobile on a per mile basis and at a rate equal to
the rate used for reimbursing all City employees for business use
of a personal automobile.
13. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. Nothing in this
Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the
right of the City Council to terminate the services of Hurm at any
time, for any reason, subject only to the provisions of this
Agreement. Furthermore, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent,
limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of Hurm to resign at
any time from his position with the City, subj ect only to the
provisions of this Agreement.
14. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in
this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or
unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or a portion
thereof, shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected and
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ATTEST:
By: Robert B. Bean, Mayor
James C. Hurm, Employee
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF MERIT
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Council has reviewed
the performance of City Administrator, James C. Hurm; and
WHEREAS, it is the determination of the City
Council that the performance of the City Administrator has
been meritorious during the year 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has not had a pay
adjustment since January, 1993; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council
to reward meritorious performance with merit pay.
NOW I THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the
Shorewood City Administrator, James C. Hurm, shall be awarded
a merit payment for his job performance during 1994 in the
amount of $2,100 to be paid in the month of January, 1995.
ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council this 23rd
day of January, 1995.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
3b
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ORDINANCE NO. 296
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 802.02
OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE
REGARDING GENERAL OPERATION ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
OF SNOWMOBILES
The City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, ordains:
Section 1: Section 802.02 of the Shorewood City Code is amended as follows:
.
Subd. 1. No person shall operate a snowmobile upon the roadway, shoulder or
inside bank or slope of any trunk, County-
State aid, City or County highway in the City and, in the case of a divided
trunk or County highway, on the right-of-way between the opposing lanes of
traffic, except as provided in this Chapter, nor shall operation on any such
highway be permitted, where the roadway directly abuts a public sidewalk 0 r
property used for private purposes. No person shall operate a snowmobile
within the right-of-way of any trunk, County-State aid, City or County highway
bet'.veen the b01:lrs of one half (1.'2) hour after SUBset to one half (112) hour
before s1:lBrise, at times other than those times authorized in t his
ChaDter. except on the right-hand side of such right-of-way and in the same
direction as the highway traffic on the nearest lane of the roadway adj acen t
thereto. No snowmobile shall be operated at any time within the right-of-way
of any interstate highway or freeway within the City.
.
Subd. 3. e. If the crossing is made between the hours of one half (1/ 2)
hour after sunset to one half (1/2) hour before sunrise or in conditions of
reduced ';isibility, only if both front and rear lights are illuminated. The
crossing is made during the times authorized in this Chapter,
and both front and rear lights are i I I u m i n ate d .
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESO'
this 23rd day of January, 1995.
Robert B. Bean, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
~5
..
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236
l\1EMORANDUM
.
TO:
FROM:
DAlE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
29 December 1994
Pennington, James - C.U.P. for Accessory Space Over 1200 Square Feet
405 (94.30)
BACKGROUND
Mr. James Pennington proposes to build a detached garage/storage building at the rear of his
property, located at 5860 Eureka Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached).. Sjnce the
area of the new building, combined with the area of an existing attached garage exceeds 1200
square feet, the applicant has requested a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 1201.03
Subd. 2.d.(4) of the Zoning Code.
The proposed building is a storage building which already exists at 25680 State Highway 7 (the
Land-De-Con Nursery site). Mr. Pennington proposes to dismantle the building and reconstruct
it on his property. The applicant's request is explained in a letter, dated 30 November 1994 (see
Exhibit C). Existing house plans are shown on Exhibit D and a photo of the proposed building
is shown on Exhibit E. -
ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION
Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4) of Shorewood's Zoning Code sets forth criteria for allowing
accessory space in excess of 1200 square feet of area. Following is how the applicant's request
complies with the Code:
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
'=tCDA
.
.
Re: Pennington, James
C.U.P. for Accessory Space
29 December 1994
page two
a. The total area of accessory space (1462 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above
grade (1536 square feet) of the principal structure.
b. The total area of accessory space does not exceed 10 percent of the minimum lot area for the
R-IA district (.10 x 40,000 square feet = 4000 square feet).
c. The proposed building complies with the height and setback requirements of the R-IA
district. It is located similarly to an accessory building on the lot to the south of the subject
site (see Exhibit B).
d. The proposed building is considered to be architecturally compatible with the existing home
(see Exhibits D and E).
Based upon the preceding it is recommended that the applicant's request for a c.u.p. be granted
subject to the following:
1. The proposed building must be reconstructed according to the State Building Code and
completed within six months of approval of a building permit.
2. The applicant is advised that no home occupation may be conducted within an accessory
building unless a separate conditional use permit is approved by the City.
BJN:ph
cc: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
Jim Pennington
j"~'~8
,
,
,
.
,
,
":
,
,
.
.
"I~
100
,0 RWS
. (16)
"/':
( 24)
----. ----------------- --8
) ~
<::
7
( 15)
@ij~7l@~~
R
1@
\ 'S~.\'
~! I
10 ROOS
~
~
~
7
(20)
-Svbj~'
(21)
.
:
f-oI.... 131. 15..40.:-131. 15..--i
i ~ ~-. -' / r I .', :
t I I I
, , .
----,37----1 (27) ! (28). !
S'-i'; i ! I
. (5): : !
. , ,
. , ,
I I.,
--------- - ~-~-N liFo{ ~lOiS -jr i-j"5-~-Ai;lRs Oiii(o.'s---- - --
1- 76:
. i
,
:
.
,
12
----- -.. --.. -------- --..-.
! ,- '." /,,1
4
\..
aL!
.~
~ I~
! 'LM))~
(22)
( 10)
~~~\9)
~I.l
~::z: i I
:;l- )
- ~ "1!1J1 (25
v I 17
..
sag'",!
~ r; t " ; fflAiR!! ~
-: --.!..2~)_ _ __ ~
50
332.88 .
ESYA rES::. -
) ~
(20)
V1
W
lI:
o
10 R
~
/
..:
;e
7S
....
~~otf; ..
~
~ &t ~\t ~ 7 ~-
,. ~"i.'*'~ ~t:i (24)
~-
. 254.5
(26) ,. 1.0.,,;;..
:' ~i:l
/ ill ) ?vi
vi (25) ;~
35l. 78 . I' 267. 53
.
"t
(,lJI
t1f
76 i~
( 17)
.-..z!~--.-.--r\\~ l>-'t-.<(,~S ')
..-- \\~i\.~ \.~<(, ('1''')<1:.
a\\~ , , J',' c, r
~ ,0 . ...
" ( 16) (~ \ ,r-
,
(7)
'" ~
CITY OF SfiORE'NOOD
(8)
'1
(23)
. I ~,/
(29)
..
NDtf"
Nv~ +c"?4.tt \..v
~
'"QJ r -
1. \Q)~'
~1tfG~l~ ~
(3l.) 1
------------
'. 40
I.. 45,(O~
"'/ i
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
.
..,. I
~
R
(~)
lot
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
----- "1
]-f.0l<, ,
I
I
~" I
'7":C'
tU-
(34)
-------------
. I
'\\ ~ ,,,,.. 13
-. 1
, "
- - - - - -;:0 - - - - -- I
~::".... I)
I
I
~. t
1
I
,
I
(3~
(3(,)
"~ -- ---
n
(3)
f.
~
"
;'
~\~~
i l.t~~ 24 :
~ t (22) I
a
75
2538.64 RES
'.0' 38
( 13)
,
,
,
i
.
~--- ---
678. S
5
( 24)
57
( II)
<.
I
Uu:
( i
- '
-- !S T-A -T'~ L
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Pennington C. U.P,
I
I
J
I
I
I
t
I
~ -I I
III "
J ~ 1
I
V'I
0"-
-.!l
...
o
o
....
l:.
....
VI
~ --J
.... \A'
:: I'
~ Ci'
~
~,.
~ '':1 I
D. ~ I
~ ~
I
7:
-+-
~
~
~J
f~~
~-t
7.
'p~
"t.L:"tlt\.
~
~
A9
1
r oJ
I ~f
['
I
I
I
..+
I
I
I
I 10
'dl
, 0"-
, .,
I
tI) "
.Il '
, ,0
o Ci
\Jl '~
I; ,
,.
i
)(
-~
1::;
o
~
f"
l'
ill
~
:;:.1, 'E t
i
(J
o
. .
0-,
:;: bL
~
r,
" ..
" .
" '
L
J
'"
l!
,
'J
Exhibit B
PROPERTY SURVEY
c v (re rJ T ,A: <2. <:.. ess c;Y'l ~/TC: e....
propcJsse.d A-<U!-esS'cJil sf~~
ID7AL
I
G,q c;< PT
7 go I r=;--
//- 3,"- 1+
I
I'-I~~ FT
c ~ ~J.I\";"I'ON A-L uSe- ~ v ,'J... L~es
/S-3Q t P-T
J:
K e-A-L 12.e-
,
I /.;.;f
c;> V eJ'
,/ - .,c 'v <!. ~ J 'C.-
I? &0 5r F I ,+e.. <: e ~ 5 CJ-r'/
~o-i..I/d r3 e tA/A-.$ /~d ;~ tVc.:' T
H-o '-V.~ ve y'"'
.c.. y~ (-e d.
o ,..) /V1 .Y
Th/s
8C/;/d/~
t<.J A-S f3 (,.J / (:.j.
I,,). {9gB;.
.-rho::.. r~r'h7#';('/ T
iT
LA-ud
/5
Ve/'l 5/~/I/Ar -I-~ MJ' 1U~/Jh 6ar-s
9Af"A-Je-. Tnere!s LoTs o-t!. V-/o-ods 5("')'-/'~/~O Th~
eN TrrC-,; Af2..e.A. -rh€- b~Aje. tN/II b-e- USe..d. .{2c/"
(20 (J 57a r~e- c 4!- 1>1)' .{24"";Y5 ~ee5S", I'r~s (j.e.u Bo~7
p,.,vl \i~d~) p.I\-l,e Q.VRl.iiTvf'e..j 5,.vCJ""'CJ6'/~.:s ++rAr;(er-/ ;v1aT4?"(!'Y/~ 7flfif!ift.Jheel",~
L- A-"-' ,.; J'V\ e"LV -<.r- (;<.,j) "" e) e ",,v < ...., 5#0 W !3 i . '" e ~ r;: T e.. ')
.
/'/'4.Jk.. 7&0' -Por 1M r
r~ e..
....
~.me-, ,
y9~
Exhibit C
APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER
Dated 30 November 1994
=
~
.
I
.
L
~
"
.
l
~'-
/--111 1-1- I II
, II ( ! Ii
: i! :
, i'l I' i
'i I I'
il I '
'II :
IJ I i
.! I .
Ii. I
,I
" I
1...;1, .-
1 I~
, '
'i i '
:, i I
:1
,I
~
:
~ I
" I
~ I
i i
':, I
~ I
~ i
n
~
!
,~"
;t;
1 ~
I.'~
: ,,~...
. ""~
;+
; ~
.~
.:l
ill. ~
~ .
, ~
~
.
~ I
~
... ~.
~
~
~ ;,
d::
f-~
i i
I
i
,.1
...' ,
~ I '
I~ Ii"~ I
.;' ,i..
..' c-....
~! ..
\. I : .
I 11 I ! I
rrrr
I I .
I I ; : :
I I
I ! ,
I .
I
I
"
".<
-
, ..
". ,l..'-...
".
( '<"1:::-
-'--~I
EI
~':J.'"
j
~
oJ'> ".;.
'':~ :~~.-
-=-,
!
)
.
El
\
, i
(
I I:
II.
.. I I
,,~' : i; "." ,,\ . I
"l-'- ~--~_: \~~- i, j ~
I: . '\ ': ~. 1 ; J
.. l_+--., . :I' ,.1.
\ : I" . \. ~ I I
. 'I' 'I' +il-,
! !~- L 111 iel;is
, [ -7..__;;'7iD...--,L I ~ li: ~
r---1-'--' I;: ~ :iE
. ,,- L-.--J L...-....! I - ...
:.:-: I 1'--' I 3:~....
.... L-....!' en _ .....
-I 1 5~:_
iCl3:~
l-Ju.~
'I ~ 0 ---
!
.1 -
B EJ)
7 ,
:;Ll/.~
EJlI. ;',
;;~..'
':~'I :' )./:-
'IL- ".~
:~~- :
. I ~
i J
I 3.
'. r--1 ",.
~~
, 1
I
- ----
\
;
. i
.~!
...;
..
~. l
,.,.
I
~
, ~~-:!-: .~
"
'"
~
q
1
~
i
1~~fI:. .
- r ....... "' ,. ..l!l-----....,: ~.i4~.'.
.
..~.
1,
",,"-
...... .
--
+J-
~.
-0
,,-
.~f\
~
(j
\f\
:1
"
I:
!I I
;1
:i I
~'I
I
"
.
f'
;);
,.
..r 1- I
-Ij;~.,.. I
;.~. - !
, \\, I I I ~
! 'I . I\!. ~
I. ~
I ;;l
I !:
I I! ~
. I
I !
: .j,
..;~"I
:~i'
'. '..~..
'. \'. "
: " I.. _ "i, \~. "~'.
:,:i"
. .:.~;,:j~:~~i~
. "'~;' .
r .;-..:"
Exhibit D
BUILDING ELEVATIONS - EXISTING HOUSE
:~:~~{~
~ . 'k."~I" ,"
'. . "-/,;"
, :-':'.::f~
';of. .
" "
.\'-, .;~,.
'..:
.
.
~...,...--. .".
frD~J ~t\(~~ i-'7 '-.Vlr~~\',/ lCG~~J 4.^J ~Aj
ba.. ,/.f\."~ t<< 26'''W ->t. H\-...Jy7 (kt'\~ ~~~ ~;+()
Exhibit E
PROPOSED BUILDING
~- ..
.
.
Regarding the request for a Conditional Use Permit to build
additional garage space exceeding 1200 square feet at 5860 Eureka
Road, the permit should be denied based on the following:
1. View of the property indicates there already exists a 3-car
attached garage of proportional size. Consideration should be
given to the ratio of living space to garage space. Garage
space should not exceed living space in a residential area.
2. The house/garage are already built sideways on the lot (the
only one in this position on Eureka Road), indicating a deep
but narrow lot.
3. Has the city, in place, a restriction to prevent this building
from being used for commercial purposes? If not, and such
activities occur, is the City prepared to enforce ordinance
violations? The City must consider these questions closely
before approving.
4.
This property has a previous history of non-compliance, that
being a large storage shanty built to the rear of the
property. The City had this structure removed this summer.
Staff should provide, in written detail, a description of this
shack to the Planning Commission, so they can be completely
informed and make an educated decision.
~e~'.V.LJ
to
-rr~ s hor~""ooJ
t:V\l>t'\i ,w\D\J"7 .
re":1 i~-t
12.-.2.~ ..~+
,Jho fr..tl&r,
.
(" (l rY\A , 1\
c.c.: 1/ k>.M'~ C::o""Mi ~'S'1t't'\
f-.IV.~ or ~ c..~t1 Count-; \
.
.
JAN - 3 !995
To: City of Shorewood
From: A concerned neighbor and tax paying property owner.
Date: 31 December 1994
Reason: Pennington. James-C.D.P. for Accessory Space Over 1200 Sq Ft
I can cautiously agree to the proposed garage for cold storage of the
Pennington's accessories. However, I am concerned how the city will
enforce the statute if non-compliance occurs concerning the proposed
and/or existing garage(s). The immediate neighborhood already has two
garages (Ronald Kramer's and Bernard Whetston's) with businesses
operating from them. They visually detract from the single family
neighborhood setting along with parked vehicles and e~uipment, extra
traffic, noise (revving engines and squealing tires). and paint
fumes. The city has already proven not to be able to enforce the
court order banning snowmobile traffic along the swale on the north
edge of the Pennington's property into Freeman Park. even though the
city has posted two no snowmobiling signs there.
If the city cannot guarantee compliance of the intended use (storage,
not home occupation or other commercial purposes) of the Pennington's
garages, and state in writing what actions it will take if non-
compliance exists, the C.D.P. should be denied to avoid future
problems concerning this matter.
.
.
, ~
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DAlE:
RE:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
27 December 1994
Gopon - Variance to Expand a Nonconforming Structure and Variance to Hard
Surface Requirements
FILE NO.:
405 (94.31)
BACKGROUND
Gene and Julie Gopon have recently purchased the home located at 20645 Radisson Road (see
Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Through their representative, Ms. JoEllen Hurr, they
propose a significant remodeling of the existing structure, including a room addition on the east
side of the house and a second floor bedroom addition over the existing garage. As it currently
exists, the property does not comply with Shorewood zoning requirements in several ways:
1. The lot is substandard in width and area for the R-1 CIS zoning district in which it is located.
The Zoning Code requires lots to be 100 feet wide and 20,000 square feetin area. The
subject property is approximately 71 feet wide and contains 14,499 square feet of area (above
the O.H.W.L. of Christmas Lake). .
2. The lot does not comply with the 30-foot total side yard setback requirement. The house.is
10.1 feet from the east side of the lot and 12.3 feet from the west side (see Exhibit B). A
wooden deck and steps leading down to the lake is two feet or less from the west lot line.
~.
3. Several structures (including three feet of the house) are within the seventy-five foot
lakeshore setback, specifically three decks. Comparison of the updated survey (Exhibit B)
and an earlier survey, prepared in 1983 suggests that the three decks on the south end ofthe
lot may have been built without permits.
4. Impervious surface currently covers 32 percent of the lot. Shoreland regulations limit lot
coverage to 25 percent. .
5. The house is one and a half feet too close to Radisson Road.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
.t.&
.
.
Re: Gopon, Gene
Variances
27 December 1994
page two
The applicant proposes to replace the entire second floor of the home, adding a two-level, 7' x
27' addition on the east side of the building and adding a second level bedroom over the existing
attached garage. The home currently contains 2030 square feet of area on the main level. The
garage contains 676 square feet. The proposed addition (189 square feet) brings the total fIrst
floor area to 2895 square feet. The second floor currently contains 1629 square feet, to which
931 square feet will be added for a total 2560 square feet.
In attempting to keep the percentage of hardcover the same as it currently exists the applicant
proposes to replace an existing boardwalk on the west side of the garage with a fIve-foot wide
sidewalk, remove a small deck on the east side of the house and remove 184 square feet of patio
on the south side of the house. The data provided on Exhibit C shows a net decrease in hard
surface of six square feet. This does not, however, account for approximately 40 square feet of
balcony which extends out from the south side of the second floor. Consequently the proposed
plan increases hard cover by 34 square feet.
Exhibits D through I contain floor plans and elevations for the proposed house. Exhibit J is the
applicant's request letter.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Section 1201.03 Subd. 1 of the Zoning Code addresses nonconformities. While the intent of the
Code is that any nonconforming structures or uses will ultimately be brought up to current
standards, it is tempered somewhat for nonconforming single-family residential dwellings.
Whereas Shorewood's previous zoning regulations specifIcally prohibited any expansion of a
nonconforming structure, the current code allows for limited expansion, provided the expansion
complies with current code requirements and does not increase the nonconformity.
Replacement of the second floor and roof system will result in a taller structure. Most of this
increase in building mass takes place in the buildable area of the lot. The proposed elevations
compare the new construction to the outlines of the existing structure (shown in dashed'lines).
Despite the increased height, the proposed hip roof design tends to diminish the mass somewhat.
One area which should be corrected as part of this request is the room addition over the garage.
As mentioned the garage is located 33.5 feet from the street right-of-way, whereas the Code
requires a 35-foot setback. Extending this room to the front of the garage increases the existing
nonconformity. There are two potential solutions to this problem: 1) cut back the existing garage
1.5 feet to comply with the Code; or 2) jog the room addition back 1.5 feet.
With respect to lot coverage, it is not likely that coverage will be reduced to 25 percent of the lot
area. This would require removal of 991 square feet of hard surface. Nevertheless, there are
opportunities to decrease the nonconformity of the property. SpecifIcally, if the sidewalk is
narrowed to four feet in width (-35), the deck nearest the lake reduced by 144 square feet as
shown on Exhibit C, and the 8' x 8' deck near the lake is removed (-64), the lot coverage would
be very close to 30 percent, decreasing the existing nonconformity. Note that the four~foot wide
steps and walkway to the lake may remain in order to access the lake.
Re: Gopon, Gene
Variances
27 December 1994
page three
RECOMMENDATION
This report suggests a liberal estimate as to the value of the portion of the structure which will be
replaced versus that which will remain. It assumes that the value of the second floor and roof are
less than the fIrst floor, foundation and garage. If the structure is destroyed to more than 50
percent of its value, it must be rebuilt completely in compliance with setback requirements. In
this light it is recommended that any variance be specifIcally contingent upon preserving the fIrst
floor structure. Failure to preserve the fIrst floor structure should be grounds for complete
reconstruction entirely within the buildable area of the lot.
Subject to this stipulation and the following conditions, it is recommended that the variance be
granted:
. 1. The bedroom addition over the garage must comply with the 35-foot setback requirement.
2. The deck nearest the lake must be reduced to a four-foot maximum width as shown on
Exhibit C.
3. The 8' x 8' deck near the lake must be removed.
4. The proposed sidewalk must be reduced to four feet in width.
This recommendation allows the applicant to substantially upgrade the property, while at the
same time achieving closer compliance with Shorewood zoning regulations.
BJN :ph
.
cc: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
Gene and Julie Gopon
JoEllen Hurr . .
~
~
~
~ 0=;
~ I)=-
!Y !Y (yl
e-gl!!Y
B!J c- ~
22 ~
I!!Y 1!!6 2)
(yl @ (!,9l)
I!Y
~
<Il
"""
(\2)
~ c-o
~ ~
I!!Y !!!.!J (yl ,g
~ g!<!!l C2
!<!!II)=-~@~
22 l!!:::(yl@
I!!!!I 1!!6 2) I!!Y @
(ylg(!,9l)(!,9l) <0(
l!!YI
@llJ:
~
i
'l>lJ",<\c
,
~
----~~---
z
".-:
..-:~.
";"
"
J
100
100
105. I' <f0:
,'1.:",/0,; /
on
-
in
~i
jl
t<"'l
t-
O
)-1
I-
>
o
~
!i ~
......bij..t!ij... -~
~ ..,: < N
a - : ~
.' I
@UJl@~ "':1
!, '!
~
>-
o
~
I
: ~
.~ + .,
. .~\: ~
~~-.."---- -----j------
," ~
-...
-... ... ~~ OJ) :
I ~
,'\\ ~: <t:.
\:/~ s.
)(.
,.....)f :~ -t
~.. .-
I '-'-
~I ~
~: '-J
~1
~
~I
('
Q
..
o
"
N ('
. -------~
:!=
-
..
..~
Exhibit A
SITE LOCATION
Gopon - variance
-.
.
~-r-RAoISS(}N --Ra--f---
1 ~I
EXISTING
BUILDING
r:::\
~
.....in Iii ::!
r-n '-~
~~ ~tO
c:-hO ,
: 0""",
'ff)
55.--
..- 100. '46"W.
S.e608
c/itistlU3S
,~ '
~~
~l.L-
rACt'
Exhibit B SURVEY _ EXISTING
PR~PERTt~ctures shown
Adjacent s
, ,
, ,
. .
. .
. .
.1
\2 e.. Y\l\OV..(.
~ e.)(I';T"IIVr.. - '-'
. Ft:U;z..,.TI>lt. >N~I.o\..
~i?~ l."d
r?u'. ,4. tJ.e,,-, t.\ \ ~
M ~~~-tetv\
Le.~ l .
i:
.:t~
-~-
.C:-' ~
....
~Qr^t>".f." ~-t R~
~ 04-V~
Ad.6 ,..u~ ~\f ~o.f
.
11,1' /53
3)'~/ 4" .,-
~--
IH,
6' l'- -~ u:!i
I ~ ' I z.. ~ l- ~ 7'0
I~.oj, <t ~
uv
---
N!tf
,!, '.: rt
---
It!r ~eMDV~
\ 9ft ,p
~;;E=t ~1'1~C-~fJ
..,,- \ .
(" .. 15
-:..~..I
-. ".,...,
lc:,J.,~
., "
-',
-
.
.
.
.
.
'"
~
~
0
~
X
lJ
III
0
a
8
J
fZ..€c:.otV\~(\
Rt ~r>"~ 1
TA.WIH& W~LL.
Add 2t\6 Levt \
p;,.t. d roo rf'\
-NtW ~'. ~Pe~
..2..'7)1.';:' ~2-I'S ".f.
f<l;.l./IOlAi: . !;.'m.T I~
~^aco w""""'- ai1~.F.
__._ .Nt-'^' e;"xll.l" ~'.""II.IC,I.....
~T'DO"
, r
1I:l '" R,f:;MoIIE:D
~~. U"I ".1=.
OE::c- '" -., ~
'NN.~ . -!.M...
'tOTA"" lioD1 'i,F.
~C>I1'IDN$
':ol~W~ 2.l'Z.,~ ':IF-
M~..'< c,'T!>IIfI' &;0, "
AOOI'T"!ON ,~o 14
~1bDP 12-
~~ ':ID
"'1'01"Al.. r:,oo ,~ <;., f.
-.. .--
.
iJ:#'
.-- 10.55---
5.&6.015" -.....
Exhibit C
SITE PLAN - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
c/itisttnaS
~ 1~Ul,
-fIAf pPo.(
\-..J n It\
t\ \ P 'f2-oo-r
I'"
p,~,~
---..FtJ4 6.(~"'~ ~~\JA.'" ^"""'=' tIIJ~-I~"inlO'.J
~ II"". ~OIO ":C,....IIA1'I'V'I"'e, r~.II1!A-nD'"
'..'\
."
~ ~M""'f'CNe A4t;.A ""e~
.. ~ L-~ ,,'~0-=~; 1-...-.. Vt"~~.~wt"
- .. ! 0 ~J 0 \ I ~ -A
---~F=- F.'rl~-':' ( I 7
'<-~I 'I i-~~ ~i 1--~f:'T<-;-
rn.\..~ "-~ 0 - I~' i .~.;'J"".'~'1f'~: ~: I' - '~~~~~~ ~,-,' '[/'..r-
-.. ~ft ~ ~ .. ~'V [@
...:.-;j>. '. -J- [-.. - r I ~
rlo\<Olf'.,....'-~ -,;. ; , ,~ 'z [I -
UoIllYW"V""'~"! ~~ I
-I '-'If" ". ,... ",...,.,. , '/ - .
~: ! '1 J \:' ~,1-' A \ l'
I -~~';. , "'l ~'
:;r' ~ '
ft. .
_ _ -~ I . ....1--
,.." -,,-
II 1111''''.1' :'1' ~..,I.,..j I'''' '1
; .. . ~ ~ 4__ ~_ ~ ""' !
,:.". '---f.. ,.' .-.-..---------
.- -"'L" ..!~.,.. ----.I'-. ~ h.,~~.~~G" ,.,;.
1 . I "1 .~.,.----'--
_ el/l...,..... ..._
"'''''''w""",,W ~.~ l"'~
",^,~1" "'D j;.W-" I
!.l1.lf.Jlo -""UBI to,o,),... ~Il3 I
,t::\ -'-
,.~
r-
.
r .; i
(~r I'
: i
; :]1'
@i.::.
Ii' ,
! II
c0ll r
i I I
I
!
i
'~6'(1"'~'.,j(r
~....,,~~
oJ
~
o~-",~....cJtU'" "'.....,~) ----
.-,----
----: \
,
....
~
~.'
-_.-~..-
.-
........--- -
---
,
I
+.-....
.._' t~
,
,.\
,.-0-- ... ,-A/I 1- .---
:~ \!:!'/ , I,
~.<rt;.~~_ I 'i 1 ,
, !"
. ,II '
_-I.'c:....
I
-,r
I
i'
i.- ,;, .
--- ~..;--;
" '
_&'-"
...-..-.,.,.
\
- '~""~. \
. ~J~
11:1 ir--=-""
i l!
\. '.
I'
t
r
r
~Yr;-_..
J4! ro" ...0
I ! I
: I!
, ,
. I :
~; \
I ::;j
I =:"1
~i ~
f--
--. ~.ec> , A '-UO...:-
--..-'
l.
.@
e'@
~~.~
"
/
......
I
L/
/
.. .: (.
-" I
_ .11I.......""" ::t~tl.. .~=-Q.
1Sr-e"' '^uC6 ~ CV6~ L
,
i
i
I
I
I
!!J.'." "
"
@@
II
~
:'1"....
.\ t
....
"
,1
,
,., T7.:&I
'& i'Y'u. I..!.f!I
~
i ~
II( _-r [E3l-.
I
"-
-',
" ",
. t' ...
1--
I
1>1-4
+~
0/
t
"
2
i
'Is I
~.t .
@G :.
Hj.l~
I~'
_...,t.. ........-
r'~-'
II
..6. -
~
't
~..
...."
~~-~~-=-
'-,~J.~I~
d,~' ~.,'!>~'"
~1' /l~
\~J'
. .w:..iii [....t~ .
1-.11'-1
.I.o'<INO.......... t@1
-l..,fo...........
"
@@ !:
~~
S
\-
.-1
'.
"
@CV 'j
--,I
~
~f~''''
.~-
~.~..
~,- [!ill
/
-~,
.
.SIJ,;
-:'"-(
, ,
, I
) ,
!~
~jIJ !I.4J.
,
, ,
I
'---== ~.
.- _ p.....\'''" 'ItN6f.;1- ...&.. !i~T'l'J"
. --+
I
I
=.1 i
1". =:-. i V
. -~.=:lHJlnmhlli!l-:=--~~
N"'W!"~
.(
'r.'
<,
. .
:.:=::-::~...-
h . ~"'_~I"" "-'VD ,,,..""
~-~. c- 11"l.I,.~
""-~..,. ~ I t.Pf
': I'
\dlY:.~C:
",,' "<ef....
--} --r- _"'_'_
r- ---+------r
~TI"I ~ mE
I
t- """" elM'T~ p~ ~1"N
.::...:.....:.= f--- .,-- ~o:.~ w(wlthJ.".,o
::
r 1\1>0 N"UlKI'''-\ ~ (,,~ 0,,0 ("pI -..
.I,.
~.....re. ~ ~~'Tl"'" ::.....\Ict
N/ "...~ _.:>.II.Ie'" ............ --, ~
===- (;--- .. ~'" '1:\10 "'..."'"
~ \;"h' . ~ ;,,~~~ ""{I',(,.W1'
t-.--
}'. f-ll"
i
~i~(_l
I
I
~ &" .......0... ""......,,.
... ..... ~~.t.. IAIH' _'
~. ~I.~ ,~.. :F.. I ;:
ye&ol'<f
~..~'
~~~
.2-Lev(..{
AdJ i +\t)~
l';'f."=,
...4~
\~J
..5'
c'
(~~-c.1:...N 'l",oIo()~'
....
, "
" Jr,
Exhibit D
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
.
.
,.---.------ -
i
i
I
!
~~ fia~ t
K ' (, '......
-~-:,.1
I
r
/'
/
r---- -_.-
^~
lI'
")
~ k..o~~ b-kr\~\O(\
I 1101. "/
11,--
ft-. ,\ Ii
:~ LJ ,-I
";,,--,,,;.;.: /l' ~'': I~'f
~:~..,. r'i'
II !
;! I
~ ['VO ~,*NI
I~, ~"
, ; ~~~~~. r'-
td
tp. r~lIIttoJlOtl''N
,/
.,
, t----
. ~- t ~~=-- ~ -1-
1'*) - 'I
I
-. ,
et::
~1..- -
/,
T
i (-
\,
,..---.
-^
~
. I
,:.~
I ./
;'::.1...
. , I
I
1 :
1 ~ I
f
"
II t r I
,I. I
11 j,.
: I:
': I
;
...~
~
;:t
~
~'" ,
~. ;..;
1
!i
"
~
",.. -. .
, 'tI"'" I
"',',
..'
j' :
II-. ~crz-. ~
! ~..
....
~:
~""~""''''CI, -,~7f
t IDr, li I
. ". ; '::>-r~:.'-
I .&
.1 ~
1
.i I
.Lj
jl'
...
n.
l~'.c I
...
"'1
.'
ri"
f'
-....
;;..
I
.+
I
I,.
:,.: !:
;...t"
T
---r
I
'~l"",,,,rn
"
. ,
\. " .
...k\.\J
eiC::-
....tI-\ ... .
'\;~/
y
r
I
r~
~'
""~I.~
I
)1
,
I:
.....
'",
~t
"
~
\
"
'_~t)'" ~L~
Ab) I~'~:'~
~., d'j
- - l;~
~ ~
11 ~
f.. ;:: ,.1
'l i ~~
I ,,/ ~
" ,..
,__H
L ._
....8 e
-4-.
----.71
. --I. I
.~.~}.
, .
! ,
....-.---------- ~ !
I
~r
i
o
i
........1--
/
"AW~[
,~J
'-teo ~ EfL
-..
"J.
~.~
..
~
l'
I
\
~~~ ~ EE!
'.
~tI....
{ (
\, "'I.'
I
-+
'.
~~~..
..'"
/~^
'<1
..l. '0'_'
,'.
I
..__1.._.
- . .
1-
.. 1_.
-'., ~
,.'.~ .~~ ,;1f .~ ~t
''':'';~:-
I
I
I
I
o
I
.,Ie
II
I I
I
I
!
~.
I
I
j"
~"~-\-~1 ~A("'j~
II.... ~J"-"".. :_
Exhibit E
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
.
~2A 1'1 Ve.
\,.\ --'~
~"'(
,.,
I
i
~N"T'I ~ ,
"-
'''-~
~
...........
-
"
.
'-
...
~--- -
"
"'-
.~
,
,
. ~ ~~~ ~~.~~.
.---- "';;>Tvu.-C'
-------/ ~e, lZc
~ 21..11""'''
.~.
\~~~1~:~:~."" -'
l ; \ -'-lffili
Ii' .
Ii" ~ . i ;.~ .,
I ;. ~ ll:,f
I I ;fi \ \; it;
,! r:1' \\ !i '
I -:i i ,. I
~+~~~_L;_. :~
! - I I
.-+t
-
-.- .
_.. - ._~.
I
~e~~~
i
--~-_.
. l
. -. ----. ------ .'- -- .--' -~
1 I - I
-~i'. it- - --, ,---- -. -
.Lr .
. . - ..-..----- - ----
~
i
I
.
, -
I
~I
;
. .
~ 1 ~ tWCIi-o ~It",..j
. I }.M1"~ e.~It;.-nlJc!lI .
.i
I
~
:.1 '.' ':.CVi~
. -M
~t...e. \1,0.(1"1 0 toJ
'., .
.......
I/tf' ; I'_on
--T
I
--l.,
_ __ -L
F r M"\ ( '7trc.et)
Exhibit F
BUILDING ELEV A TION - FRONT
/~
I_
/
/
,
I
'j
',' i
I' I '_...f-. T
· -I J
. ' I
I ...to
Ii
I~i
I j
I I,
, ~ 1- ~~:. .
I ~
'I' ~
I .
I I'
I
!I
: I
I
t
I
I I
I j
i ,; . I. I
l 1
~: '. I'
; . ',' '~ f~t . }~
. ";..~~. .;
". ,I ~.,
I . '.
. 'J:*, :..'.
-:-- ,I I ".
" ,,~, r: ,.'"
'. J i "
I .I
I. ,1 ,
II
I
,". ,.
I j,
I
, 'I '
, I. " ,
.,'/.
~. _.11
"- ~...~ ~ +
I .
.;,H:- - -iJ
'.' :~. i " ~ .1)..- .
'a~
"'i;
. t ~
\
. . 'I .~
: ...; ,./ L
' t ..-" . , .
--"--, .'; /':
.! .:; :
I
t ' ' ,
· I.' h,.i,/i
It. I ' .f
:: I '/" ;'
., I. . ,
' . ! .
I; ,. I " , "
'I I ,/
pi
//"/'j ,
/ \.
~ .-
f
1.
'I'
f
!
...
I
. I
,j
'. j .
, .
'. ,',j".',.:'..
" ~.
,
i-
. .~
I
~
. 1-:. j
; ; I
L . 1/;;1,
". , " I
. . ;;:'1 : :; i I i I
' . : ':!: II : i I \
. ;- .. ,I I' 1
. 1 '
I, I; .
:, ," I
" 11 'I
.: :, i. " 'I ' " '
'" 'I
:), .I
J ,. : "
Ii! .
,'l':';~_
!: i
.
I
j ,
~- I ,'\ . '.
-' 'II i
I: \
dil
I'
:,. ~'.~
- ..-.,... .~. "
""',
. 'f
~ t . . ... .~ .. ": ,.JIl"
, ,
'f ,
. ~ ' \ '.
/.
, "
j , "-" . ,...
_. - ._-~_.-----.~- .
.!
~ ....
. '.8
-$
,i
. . i
,', !
~ ,\
~ .1
2'
'r"-
\t
...,..
..t;
~
,r ~
-I
.
.'
t
w
,f
',.
. .
L
,0
~
";)
~:
~i
iZ
t t
!!
. ,
, :.
~
:~
'~
i ,
I
ea
<(
~
I
Z
o
1-4
E-<
<(
~
tI3
d
d~
:<;::Q
~~
...c::~
~~
c
o
~--
~
")
~
;i
W
-0
~-
'l'
3
~~
.u
:i
c.
r'
.... "i,
J ,I
.
...........r,ra.,J
T
:."(fIN
....
//.:.._-- "--"
~c:>oo't. - (TVF')....
.--+--
/'
/
/
/
/'/'
.-----.---.-
--
-.~ ----
/
/-
.,/
. I
. -'-'--:-4' i
.. . i
, I' I
I
I
-~ ~
"'f"'
1 "--
1\'
~u-,~
't~
~
/
'" ~ ....
-.
,..
I
.-l- _
, .
, .....
'T
~E~"~;
Io.~l
- L:. 'L^ 7' ~_.. __.
I .
L-~ "'1,0'(, ~ F:-r'-J
I'~
. F1'~I~O
~ ~\I"mON
..:+
: ~ .t ~~.. ::::::J>~ f
I
~ eeIS"I""'" '"
a-F- ~
--~
----1
-~--- --------,
I
1
!i
,.
i'
il
-t
I
.~ ----
. <
Exhibit H
BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST SIDE
~! 1....'-1
. ....-
,.., --
. 2' E\.:..J.!Jlj
'. . .-.... .,._--.l.__ --.. -----fit'. ;; : :4-.. .
.....-. .' ~....
',-:':' '- -'-- -., .k....
I .' 'tE:XlST'N'- -....uR:>>fUorf..... ~,;-. 'j 1 ",
. '-_ _ ~~"ON_ ~ ~~ _ ~ ':.,:> 'I !
F,...--------.-'- - -~.
--...- .. ..-. -.... . /' ' ~ .
i i I
. ,
--
.."
"
"
'"
"
,.
I
...Y.
__ ~t.6N:- v&..r.' c.'N'~)
------"~
~ - ---;--- - -
. ~.~:.-.-_..~ .---..----:- ~~~~=--~" .
".
/
,
/'
/
./'
"
"
.........
.
'F'='=f =-00
r '1 1--.1
i.J~ ~;' :
//
/
//
/
....-
--
J ~~~~r:~.. ~.-....
----
--
,
- ._;;-_... ..... --
n'
i
~
i '/
I ~ "
;;:: _ ....- _ _ _ ---J:" _ - - _.:...... ~
~-~ fr' ""1TI- ~~-::l - ~ ~ --
I I, ~,:. ~ " .
j f . -!
I. .t \
'L11 I
. 0 ~ I
, '
. . I';
. t
-- '-'- "
. I'
.1
1 .
-r!'
~ .r'J
. J
. .., -. .
~-ff
mIl
I [J,:
,I.
, I ".
I I Lr -
..... .- . ..- ~1--- -:- ~.. -f:.:L - - ~~
r .l- - - ' . 1-'" - -~
1- -.,- I ~ .
I r--t-r----+-
L r- .... I--+-
--- --;',--+
:-I,l~_ __ _. ---..
t~
;; ~
LlW1" -->,}~.
---- .- ---- -
!
i
Ill. ___
.:--- , .
/ " In".
! ,~' II" ;
I! . "~I~__/"h j.
t
t
,
I
;.
'-
.
. . I I
i !I!, "j: ~
. .....
I ,,' I
. ti~ ~ "'
'! r-:;-ll . ' !
1'1'; ,/ '",' : :
.~ q Ii; i _~ ~ ; , ;~; ;,
. 'H..1 i I,
... ~.
+-'-
I
-L _ ~
I
t-t- _.. -
I-- - -
!
.. ri
T'
("\ kJ ! c; j"
\..-I'
~ l.. !. \J ~ j lOr'
)lfJ/:..j
Exhibit I
BUILDING ELEV A TION .. EAST SIDE
.
.
TO:
:3horewood Pl arInin!~ Comrni s:;i on
Shore\",oOtj Ci t.q Counci 1
FF:Oit
.JoEllen Hurr
DATE: .~ IJ-/t.f-9~
ITE!"1: Variance request for Gene arllj .Julie Gopon
The applicants have purchased the property at 20645 Radisson Road}
PID number 36-117-23-22-0026. This parcel is locate,j on cr-iristrnas Lake.
The lot j~:; apprmdrnately 70 try 225 and is 14A99 square feet in area. It i:3
113 of i3n acre in your current one acre zone.
TI-lo 'n,-,t-r-jO l'c ;:I. cplit 1....'/o1r-loc-l.f1n that ',M;:I.'=: bl'l'lt 1'1" 11~h'-(' Tho 1".......\1
I I:,.. J _". ,_" "_I U "_' f '. II:;~'J LJ,...__"::t 1.1 . If l..JoJ ..f _ I _" _"00'. . tIC: I::: I!
o'vvners have been workin!j '-Nith Bill Michaels of Bruce Knutson Architects to
up gra1je and tip ,jate the current resiljenc8.
Ttle existing footprint is remaining essentially the same "Nith a
realignment of the front sidewalk and the addition of a 7 by 27 foot
mechanical area that "Nill allow for the foot.ings for the roof trusses,
The herd cover ',(vin tie sligfltly reljucelj from 'Nhat 8i<lStS on the site
tod8~~. This is flccomplishe1j by the removal of some side ~~ard decking., a
entry boanj walk: anlj an e::<pose1j aggregate patio on the vv'alkout 18ye1.
Tl"le variance request is to aHo'v'! the existing decks and steps to
remain in the 0-75 foot setback area. It is our understanding from a
previOUS OViner that the lake shore improvements were in place when he
purchosed the propert~J 15 yeors ogo.
The topography of the site requires steps to the lake and also
retaining "Nalls and a lan,jing area. The properties on either side of the
subject sae have steps and also concrete or wooden decks. The property on
nle east has a two story building that :::eems to be at least 40 feet wide
located less than 20 feet from the lake srlore.
Exhibit J
APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER
Dated 14 December 1994
.
The 1 ijnlj 'Niti1in the 0-75 foot. settltlck ijr8a is woodelj iJnd has a stable
"'-'-Ii ,."tlj rr'~lp.r 0.-.t'''b1 i '~h-""j Tho ,~+ ''''''''r. ,..l....r..... 1',... n -.' 'r-'-II-" 'cHi T~"'e unl~-O''''I~I'''rr-I''''n+ c-
~:(1 '..' .0,11 _' _' ,-' '_'~ l~ I-jl C'. 11,__.j '-'Cc:~ .j J_i~,t:: .:' tl t i J ','1- '..-"J. t (. ~ __I c..1 I c: I.,....}
in U-!i~3 area ;are generall~d not visible to lake users. The removal of the
v-/'a 11 s or ,jecks v'/'ouhj 8i<pose tj'le 1 anlj to erosi on ancl run o-ff to the 1 ake. The
!]round cover on the hi 11 prevent.s any f ert i1 i zer from r8acrli n~;J the 1 ake.
The average front yard setback of structuf% on U"le adjoining
properties should allow the ne",i'( oy.mers to retain the e;~:isting st.eps.. decks
ond rettJining wellls.
.
The grantlng of the variance requested meets t.he intent of your code
arllj does not violate U-Ie con,jitions imposed tl~j the Shorelian,j Regulations.
.
TO: Shorewood Ci ty Council
FRO!"l: Gene find Julie Gopon
DATE: ..January 17, 1995
IT En Variance request for Gene and Julie Gopon
We have purchased the propertu at 20645 Radlsson Road, PID number
'"
36-117-23-22-0026. This parcel is located on Christmas Lake. The lot is
approximately 70 by 225 and is 14,499 square feet in area. It is 1 /3 of an
acre in your current 20,000 square foot zone.
.
The home is a split level design that was built in 1960. We have been
working with Bill f1ichaels of Bruce Knutson Architects to up grade and up
date the current residence.
We want to thank the staff and the Planning Commission for the time
they have spent on our variance request. We would like to exploin again our
concerns relating to cutting back on the existing garage structure and our
wish for this minimal variance.
.
THE ST AFF REPORT AND PLANNING COMt11SSION RECOMfvlENDATION TO
REQUIRE THE GARAGE SECOND LEVEL ADDITION TO BE SET BACK 1.5 FEET AT
THE CLOSEST CORNER DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE CONDITIONS FOR
GRANT I NG A V AR I ANCE NOTED I N OUR CODE.
THIS REQUEST DOES NOT It'lPAIR THE SUPPL V OF LIGHT ORAIR TO
ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNREASONABL V INCREASE CONGESTION IN THE PUBLIC
STREET, INCREASE THE DANGER OF FIRE OR ENDANGER THE PUBLIC SAFETV,
UNREASONABLY DlfvllNISH OR It'lPAIR ESTABLISHED PROPERTY VALUES WITHIN
. THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT DOES NOT VIOLATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF
VARIANCES WITHIN THE CITY COt'lPREHENSIVE PLAN.
ALMOST ALL OF THE SECOND LEVEL ADDITION IS WITHIN THE
CURRENTL V PERMITTED BUILDING ENVELOPE. THE HEIGHT OF THE NE'w
ADDITION WILL BE MEASURED AT 22 FEET \r/HEN OUR CODE ALLOWS A 35 FOOT
HEIGHT.
"
The lend 'Nithin the 0-75 foot settli3ck ef8a is woode,j end lies e stable
'-11-,-,' 1'"!lj I-'f-I~l.:.r oC't ';,bl i .::-h.....j Tho '::-+ '-"-'n c.l....r.-. l' C' n -,+ t"'- - '"....0.-1 Tll'"' onl"'''o.",,-.l-'rr- '-'n+ Co
!jl'_"..dl _-_",r:;: ._.~.J... !-...lr;::.. .JI_"Jf..c:c~.-"J_;~h::.~ '-It iIU"'J'.1. Ie r:;:1...1 1.J....tl Ie: l..J
in Uli'; area are generall!d not visible to lake users. The rerno'./al of the
v':, a 11 s or deck~:; '.f':'Oul ij ei<pose trle 1 arjlj to 8rosi on arllj run o-ff to the 1 ake. The
!jrol.md cover on the hil1 prevents an~d fertilizer from reacrlin!j the lake.
The average front yard setback of structures on trl8 adjoining
properties should allow the nev.( ov.mers to retain the ei<:isting steps.. decks
Elnd retaining wEll1s.
.
The grantlng of the variance requested meets the intent of your cOlje
arllj does not violate the conljitions imposed t'!l the Shorelan.j Regulations.
.
~
.
.
THIS UPGRADE OF THE SITE IS A REASONABLE USE OF THE LAND.
TO DENV THE 1 AND 1/2 FOOT VARIANCE FOR A 4 AND 1/2 SQUARE FOOT
ENCROACHMENT DENIES LIS THE REASONABLE LISE OF OUR BUILDING WITH THE
MINI~1UM VARIANCE NECESSARV.
THE CIRCUMSTANCES DO NOT RESULT FROM OUR ACTIONS AND WILL NOT
CREATE A SITUATION UNIQUE TO THE AREA
THE ATT ACHED SURVEV AND PHOTOS SHOW THAT THE TRAVELED
PORTION OF THE ROAD IS AT LEAST TWELVE FEET FROM THE PROPERTY
CORNER AND THE SECOND LEVEL ABOVE THE GARAGE WILL IN FACT BE 45 +
FEET FROM THE TRAVELED ROAD.
y.!e are requesting permlssion to apply for the bulldlng permlt and start.
const.ructlon after you have given your approval but before the formal
adoption of the resolution.
-
.
l....
I ........
I ....,....
I ~......
I
t: ..~..
.
'0,1
.
'l.G.
:to
J
<(
1
iii
0 '"
a:
<t
Q
III
~
z::
uJ:j
"1-'
c( ILl IS\
IX 3: <t
\LOIR
,....-0
lX:>e-I
00' ,
to!
.~~ ,.:
. .J
~c(
, ~
1ft
..
<t
I
,
yO
ID
u"i
\I\
.....
7.0
EXISTING
BUILDING
.
~:
.-t~
- .
.':3 in
o~ ('1
i:
'1'1..~
J
<(
~
III
;
%
~
I-
uJ
IX
III
5
!n
Jt.O
~
III
DECK
...
<Ii
.
.;
16.'2.
";'" .,-
',,:' .
iu.i
.....
r-Il'l
~~
(:Jro
, o.;t
.
I .
VI
'i'i
~9
5~
-.--
t;u;;;'1 \.\NE.
I
\~I \ '
III I
~ ,_, ~:.~~_.1
Ct: (,"
X I ,',,,--.\
U ., "
~ '0. !
o
8
~
10.11.._.-.- --
\:.~:-l
\'C-J
\
00.
'<f
......
1"'\
'RETII.IHIHCO WA\..L
w 10.55,,-
~ N;"Oa'46"W.
I
; J:#t
.
- .'
.i-_ _of
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.
Mayor and City Council
Brad Nielsen
19 January 1995
Zucco, Peter - Appeal Notice to Remove
Property - 4485 Ench3nted Point
Mr. Peter Zucco has asked for additional time to comply with a Notice to Remove which--
was sent to his father in November (see Notice, Exhibit A attached). In his appeal letter
(see Exhibit B) Mr. Zucco does not specify a date when the violations will be corrected.
He states that "everything will be brought up to code" when his father returns from
Arizona, but does not indicate when that will be.
.
It is recommended that Mr. Zucco be given until 23 February 1995 to correct all violations
except the large boat, which should be removed by 15 May 1995. If he fails to comply by
those deadlines, the City will, without further notice, take further action to have the items
removed.
If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior
to Monday night's meeting.
cc: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
F.J. Zucco
Peter Zucco
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~~f
PROPERTY FILE
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCl L
Krist; Stover
ROb Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
'""
......
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
----
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612)474-3236
TO: F.l. ZUCCO
4485 Enchanted Point
Shorewood., MN 55364
DATE: 10 November 1994
..
PROPERTY LOCATION: 4485 Enchanted Point
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: 30-117-23-33-0013
NOTICE TO REMOVE
Offensive and Unhealthv Substances
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there exists a condition on the above referenced property which
is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501. 0 1 of the Shorewood City Code, a copy of which
Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes, but is not
limited to the following:
V olvo (maroon), License No. 905 KCU (July '94)
UNLICENSED AND/OR INOPERABLE VEIDCLES OR EOUIPMENT:
\
,
)
OTHER:
Tires, construction debris, batteries, well pump, pallets, concrete
blocks, fencing, pipes, tank, bricks, tiles; approx. 5 Cll yds.
. You are hereby required to remove the.above-described matter and any other offensive matter
located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 within ten (10) days from
the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City
Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the City Council.
If you do not respond to this Notice within ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as
may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such
removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lein against the property.
*** PLEASE GIVE TIDS MATTER YO~ IMMEDIATE ATTENTION ***
BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL
5(h,b\+
A-I
A Residential Communiry on uke Minneronka's Sourh Shore
~
MAYOR
Bartl Bra ncsl
COUNCl L
Kristi Seover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (6121474.3236
10 November 1994
Mr. F. J. Zucco
4485 Enchanted Point
Shorewood.. MN 55331
Re: Zoning Violations - 4485 Enchanted Point
P.I.N. 30-117-23-33-0013
. Dear Mr. Zucco:
Our office has received neighborhood complaintS alleging that certain City Code violations exist on
your property at the above-referenced address. Upon inspection of the premises, the allegations
were found to be accurate.
. .
The following violation of Shorewood's Zoning Code (Chapter 1201), Permitted Accessory Uses,
was found:
.
. Large boat, License No. MN 5797 ED (95), not registered to occupant of
property and stored within the setback area of lot.
. Brown boat on trailer, License No. 527 278 (95), not registered to
occupant of property and stored within the setback area of lot.
. Maroon Volvo, License No. 905 KCD (July 94), expired license, and being
stored on vacant parcel adjacent to subject property.
Also noted at the site were items in violation of Chapter 501 of the City Code for which the
attached "Notice to Remove" is included with this letter.
-
This is to advise you that the violations must be corrected by 21 November 1994, after which your
property will be reinspected for compliance. Failure to comply will result in the matter being
turned over to the City Attorney fOf further legal action.
If you wish to appeal this order to the City Council, you must do so in writing, by 21 November
1994. Your appeal must state why you can not or will not correct the violations, or if you request
additional time for compliance, how much time. Your written appeal will stop further action until
such time as the City Council has considered the mattef.
If you have any questions relative to this letter, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
Bradley J. Nielsen
Planning Director
cc:
Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
t:xk;b;t A-L
A Residenrial Communiry on Lake Minneronka's South Shore
, Jy... - . A /, I. /' u 6 1../
~' / v en."!/" r,..,A,'\.l'1 I 1 /
ft/ r f!ruJ 7)~~ 1
P - ..;- 15). c.""<.2,!-;..~
'-~
jldl.L'-~~ 911,/ 5533/
/
Re: 1r)'j/k~ki-i;.dkL?(d~J4
~ ~ ~. -' J. b.....-t; ~.... i:;; ""'-<. d'h..l. ~ (vot...j ~
~dL-'7J.:). ~ J..Zt~ . ./:.1
o/Jf/)- r) ~
'I,-,~ld: /?N- ~ cP a-n. ~ i -; p&"~ ~ ~ d.vT
&l i,n:t 1L~~~~~~n..dp~JIU~
rvf ~Lf S-- 5 ~ p.H-:J:. ~ a;,., aLe~;;Z d.",d -d... :i;:;-":;i
~/ ;u-,.tdJUf ~ b4k J w:-U fU<-~ ~4 _
j)k~~6~J~~~~~:;ek
),J-'J} fU<-? an.) "'-U,,<- id iud.a _, jJ ~ d J ~_~
<h-\ ~ S d.4 "-~"'V~ "" ~, ~ h d ~11-<4_
~.~..ck ~~~. .:P"-.J/:L-~~
~.,,-~~ ~ 17'&'~14-~ b~(~t:<r
tJ.IJ. &..." b.....f"'" ~ ~#ft1lllS717 ~ 'HS) ~ -U. j)
~.~ !.-4:.J 0"Y'd... ""/7';-s~,.J.-t ~. ~
~ ~ -&- -?~ ~ ~ ......, ~ u<<:f 0( sfM .,;."
.~ SpU"Jj cn;~ . .
J..a. -r r.w >C/...t. I'd"",? 13 d"CI')' ~# "A'/41 s 7 ~ 7 D../ d:t cO
~ ~ fJ",,~ !f?:>eJ j)""" ~ d..t ~..-4 b
/M~ 11.~'?/4 i-" ~ ~~/0~. j) t.....JJ~
U t.- · -.::-~ -r ~ ~ 7c-~: d4 b~;t'7-,
du.~~: J}~~JJd=~f;zkt:z?
d ~:J /W';7' ~<<.bt t;,...~ a. "-13 M f"h,. , bo-r;..-+ d4 .
~~':f .(;tj.; ~~ ~ d. u. ~. ':": a.;..J ~ .&~.G-~ -!..~:/ I. C L
"'" d w'U.-~ L.::....t ~ 4 ,~-W k-t i;;;;..~.:t ~~,-,-t.;.;t _ ~
,/ t' . -T~
~h;b;~ f)
;: .
~-
&&-b/#~'&1^ 4~~/ d7'3~
hurvf mv-d & ~ tu,,- d~ ~ j;;-~ i;
4 t,,~ ~ ~, j;~~ -d}; ~ ~ fVk~ ~ ~l
~.~~~L - ~ ~ ~~-6<- (J"d J~ ~
J~r3~ ~At.~fi-4~ ka- JdrN-t+,
f~~'1~ -djuc.l~d:F~~>
~..d~~'T"~~r~...~.. ...
~ tk~w*Z ~Jf1~~0 ~.~~:'
~ 6~Jf~..~.L4 ~ ~ ~~., _ .
7k -j;;;Q ~~ ~.0fdM if:9J}~J ~
9 C 00~j'/~~~i~'.l.4~~. ........
~_ U ~~ a.q-~.J~ /().C4/!4.b>,~ ttdJ
0, ~L.aA~ ~- -" .' '.. - ....... .
cP : p;'" ~-I..__;;"2. 'lJ ~.;1/ d;:;/ ~~ ..
~~XIZi? ~ '~_fL~~",
/tr ~_-~. ~~ -d.J Jl~ ~ i,.~, i
hada.z-" ~fJ~~ a~b'4~..i..0J~.
iv~d~ ML~/1J1/~7'3j()1?'crk'
(j [) ~\ j)~,. ..~ ~ d.:t v.z ~CLj)~'
,~_~~~.-L-rr#..M'~A~/ .
-Un err;~. IN~ _ o/Y) f.A ~'-cf} dVJY1 L/;) . -+f ",
4~fU~ /y'~~_f/;:;;:2 ." c~ ~ .
.~~ ~~M~'~'~ ,. ,JJWtt4 ~-"'i1 '..'
~N.. -e.l.u4l .'); t7'!V-fi Qh -Jh.. . ~J -;c1ct ,^r.L4- ,z,~ ,j;, /?'?l.e. ~
~ ~~:), ~i -Z-n l1e~~~t vf I fr / ? "7 ~f-t
'"7.
"'.. . 0
Jf r m~ ~r:-~ ~~ ~ .'.
JlV-t;-~t.~ ~~C &~ ~ ~A ~
~ up ~-,
U ~ ~J &L wid "" c.d(~' .~'.
P-04 ~j~ ~ bJ crWL~ -ii:- .~ ~
tw- ~~. .1J ~ t'.r-14 '-<J ~ d.a ~~
CiILL ~,~ f ~ <boef~. ~~ L- ~. :
+:- ~ ~ ~;;t ~ AJ4€-/0-4- C( hod~. .
~1\ 4 kAaJbd d~;;,~ e& .
p-rfaJ~d~.~~k~uJ.~ .
~ ~t-v.LJy~ p{JL~r~
kIv.~~~~h'~ d L-~.
~ .~~. ?_ ;j) ~ d.r "P. ~ ~u .?Cr. '.
.cllf1~. -~~H~'"
~ . - ~ .-t-ll J. /J 1/ ~v~-dd A /yy\1:'J..I ~-f1.A1,.r ~~
~ 4 M';{:N. /Ct.{i<i; '4 r""'-:'''-IT~' . :G-'~~ bk:. .
o"J~cP ~ L{-.cl~ ~/d- ~ ~. ~~.. c
".+"'~' v..~ ~~ ;j)~~ . _ j), .,
~.'Jj ~. .., t~'J;-~~ _
U.~.~r ~r~aL:.' .." . ....
O. 1T~ '. ..~c, ex. ;i;pL~.J.7Js
p~ o-f-A'-0':j ~ ~ tf ,,!. fe.f<:-~2-<1,C;CO . T s~}
~ tT"r'- ~ .~ ~ ~- Gen.ua-1. ()eJ.'V~/J_ 1'1,S'S"cf'u.pi
() . ~ /J I J -. -I- I 1 :,; # ~ (X,"rrh - fJ tih-e ~ ~
& frJl-(/I ..Juz. l./\'\ ~(A.... r f.tV ----. , V'~ . . '. .'. .
~H ~ d~' ,- J;:;~
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
Mayor and 51u~ilmembers
AI Rolek ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
January 19, 1995
Utility Billing Late Penalty Policy
.
At the last Council meeting I was directed to write a draft policy for the handling of late
penalties on utility billing accounts. The following is some wording which I believe is in line
with the Council's intent for such a policy.
DRAFT POLICY
The City Finance Director will have the authority to abate a late penalty from a residential
utility billing account in an amount not to exceed $25.00 at his/her discretion according to the
following criteria:
1 . The resident whose utility billing account has incurred such penalty has
made an appeal for abatement to the Finance Director; and,
2. The penalty placed upon such account was directly the result of an error on
the part of the City; or,
3.
It can be demonstrated by the resident requesting the abatement that the late
payment of the utility charges is due to unusual circumstances (except for
postal delays); and,
.
4.. ... The penalty is for a billing period which is within the most recent two
billing periods; and/or,
.5 . The account which has incurred such penalty has been current and has
incurred no prior penalties for the period of one (1) year.
The Finance Director will examine the appeal and determine its compliance with the criteria
listed above. If the appeal falls within the parameters set forth in the criteria, the Finance
Director will credit the resident's utility account for the amount of the penalty. In the event that
the Finance Director does not find sufficient cause for the abatement of the penalty, the appeal
will be denied. The resident shall have the right to make a written appeal for the abatement of
such penalty to the City CounciL
We feel that it is important to have clear criteria to enable fair and equal administration of the
policy. Please review this draft for discussion on Monday night. Should you have questions
prior to the meeting, please feel free to call me.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
*1
IIIr
1.
A.
B.
C.
D.
. E.
2.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
.
I
Mayor & Council:
Televise all City Council MeetinGs 3 1! I
Inform citizens through quarterly City newsletters 31 1 I
Identify & address zoning issues for specific sites for senior housinG proiects 2 1 I
Meet with Cooperative Services Study Task Force semi-annually I I 1 3 i
Undertake a meaningful goal settina session durinG the first 60 days of 1994 I 1 I , i
LU II
lTli-[-.
, 1 I i I I
I I I I'll 2
I 31 1 I I
I
1 I
2, 1 3
.~ .. .-._-~.- -
1994 Objectives
Key:
1 = 1 st Review (Done in JUly)
2 = 2nd Review (Done in October)
3 = Final Review (January of following year)
I
CITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE YEAR
Date: JanualV 1995
iAdministrator:
I Complete annual citizens satisfaction survey
I Update comparable worth pay plan
ITake a leadership role in interGovernmental cooperative efforts in the Lake
Minnetonka area
Review City objectives i!l July, October and at the end of the ~ar
Introduce a merit element to the City.s oav clan system
I
I
I
3. General Government:
A. Index City records, including retention schedule
B. I Microfilm City records from 1990 throuah 1993
C. I Uedate personnel records for all Citv emolovees
D. I Take over maintenance & updatinQ of Citv Code book in-house
E. I Maintain or improve on high survey "helpfulness" rating of City office staff
~ (89% helpful to very helpful)
F. I Maintain or improve on high citizen "excellenVaood" rating on "overall
service" (87%) "courteousness/professionalism" of staff (86%)
I
I I
I 1
I 31
I 1!
I I
! 11
I
4.
A.
Finance:
Preeare annual budget document & submit to GFOA Distinauished Budaet
Award Program year
Preeare CAFR for submittal to GFOA Certificate of Excellence ProQram
Provide month Iv reeorts to staff. Quarterlv reoorts to Council
Imelement Capital Improvement Annual Budaet format
Create computerized data base for General Fixed Asset records
Review debt issues and make recommendations on debt structure 1 2
Become active in one or more of Joint Cities Coordination ProQram Committee I
Investiaate alternative financina sources to reduce property tax burden I
I
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
5.
A.
B.
C.
Professional Services:
Contain costs on contracted professional services I 31 1 i
Attempt to utilize mediation services to avoid Iitiaation if 1
Develoo a statement on documents committina aeolicants to submit to mediation I 1
D.
E.
services
Increase helofulness ratinQ of City Assessor 1700/0 helpful to very heleful)
Increase citizen excellenVgood ratina on overall service (74%) and
I courteousness/professionalism of staff (83%)
>. "
II :1 1J
:: f
..: . -...;- ~
I':~ ~~ ~ tr
~~ ~:.... .Q
~ loll; ~ t: 0 ~
~ c:............ c:., g
: ::;I.:E :
.. .,:;.3:;.=.
. . ., >- :.
~ i::3~=u-:
::........~l~
Qf ",.Q J.,.Q.... ~
i 19~11 a.z 8
I I
I
i
I
1! 31
111 3
I
I
i
I 1
I I
I i I
! !
I j
1
1 ,
I
I
2, 1 i I
. 1
1 I
1
I
I
I 1
, 1 j
I
1
I
1
I
13
I I
1 I I
11
I i
:;tyA
1994 Objectives
6. Jpla!!..nin9,& Zonin~_.-' .. _____
~I Hold public meetings on dr~!:!!prehensive Plan & adopt
B. 'Provide adequate sta!f sUEport to Senior Housing Task Force
C. ~~ Ci!}' Subdivision Code
D. Establish an action plan to implement Comprehensive Plan
E. Begin work on a short-term implementation plan
F. I Complete the automation of property records
G. I Complete implementation of Rental Housing Code
H. Ilncrease citizen excellent/good rating on overall service (68%) &
courteousness/professionalism of staff (73%)
I
7. i Municipal Building - City Hal!:
~"-_ I Paint remaining Ci!~all of~~_
B.I Paint/stain deck
C. /Improve City Hall landscaping
D. Ilnstall smoke detectors in Ci!y" Hall
I
8 . I Police:
A. I Complete review of police fundino formula
ai Maintain high helpfulness rating of police personnel (90% helpful to very
I helpful)
C. iMaintain or improve on high excellent ratino on overall service (88%),
I response time (93%), courteousness/professionalism (88%), &
--.J crime prevention programs (90%)
D.IIMaintain or improve on "feeling of safety on my neighborhood" (satisfied 10
very satisfied - 88%)
i
9. I Fire Protection:
A. r Maintain helpfulness rat!!!g of tire personnel (99% helpful to verv helpful)
B. i Maintain or improve on high excellent/good rating on overall service (97%),
i response time (94%), courteousness/professionalism (97%) and
I inspection & fire prevention programs (94%)
!
1 o. ! Protective Inspect/on:
A. I Increase & enhance public information through the development of at least
I two additional handouts relative to buildino codes (total 0/ 4)
B. I Draft an article for each Citv newsletter
C. I Explore ioint inspection possibilities with adjoinino communities
D. Ilmplement automated permit tracking svstem
E. Ilncrease helpfulness ratings of building inspection (68% helpful to very
I helpful)
F. jlncrease helpfulness ratings 0/ animal control personnel (49% helpful to
I very helpful)
G. Ilncrease citiZen excellenV~od rating on overall service (74%) &
I courteousness/professionalism /73%) 0/ inspection staff
H. 1 Increase City excellenVgood ratin~ on overall service of animal control
i personnel (41%)
I
11. I City Engineer:
A. I Produce a readable maD of the City for public distribution
B. IComplete an inventory of right-of-way needs on collector street system
C. I Keep construction project files up-to-date and accurate
D. iCommunicate in written form to affected residents at least two (2) times
I during a construction project
E. I Keep chanqe orders at less than 5% of orioinal contract amount
...
..-
il;: <4: ~
....010 WO'lo_
""'- .-
" ....
. '" G' ,. c; 0
'5 c:..... -- c:..
. &'0.5'0.:
~ ..: a-J ...."'"
. 4 ~ J~ :~
:l~:~~u
~ ~: t:.l ~l
al:1l28:
~I!I
I ltll-
'/-'r-- -r-r
. ,1,
-~Et-1~1=
I I I /11
I /11 I I
I 11 i I
I 1 I 1
t---'-
I 11 U_
in-II
I I I i
i 2 i ! 11 ,
T2!--r1"I--r-
i i 11 I I ~
I i /1 i 31
'I i :-h-
! I I ; I
i 111,-tr-
i 11 I'
i I I
I 11 I
I ! I i
I I 1 I
! 1 I I I
I I I I
I J i
t ;
I
I
I 11 I
1 i I I i
I 1 : I
II I I 1
I , I
I 1 I I I
I I 2 11 I
I I I I ,
11 I I I
I /11
I I 1
I
,---
I
I I
I .l I
I rr-
I 1 I I
I liLt-
I" II
3 2 11
31211/
2!11+L
I 3l.lLr-.I_
I I I I .
! i 1 i r--T3
i
11
I
11
I
I
1 1
WI
...
.
'"
"
~ :
... 41ff
}!
:
o
~
.
>
~
..
"
.~
4
o
.
.
I I I I :
IIII [
3 1 i -L-_I
I Trl 1-
~L*
Ptt-~
I I'
13. Streets & Roadways: I 1'1 -
A. [Develop a pavement management system to aid in schedulina of street proiects ! 1
B. Paint lane man<inQs on all designated streets I -1- _l _
C. Sweeo each City st!!!~!..~.!.!eas! onc~!,..!!ually____.____Q -1.- _.t.
O. Mow roadsides at least twice annually I r 1 I I 2 i _
~~MOW boulevards at least 6 times annually i 21_!..LJJ=
F. I Visually inspect storm drainage grates annually & repair as needed I 3 i 11 I I
~ : Increase satisfaction rating on condition at streets (my street 55%. streets I 1! I I_L
~ general 60%) i :ilL
H. : Maintain or improve satisfaction level on cleanliness of street (75%) I 1; I I I
I. i Increase citizen excellent/good service rating on street maintenance (59%) i 1 i i "n-
I - I : I ! I
1 4. I Snow & Ice Removal: ! I i n-
A. I Remove snow & ice & cOl!!plete salt/sand operations within 12 hours after the 1 i II .LL-
__._1 end of a snow event. J_ __ _.!__-L
B. 1 Comolete widenino & clean-up functions within 48 hours of a snow event I 1 i I I
c. i Maintain or imorove on hiah citizen excellent/good service ratina on snow I 11 ! I
I removaI188%) ! "' ! !
I I I I
I I I I I
I Ii 111
I IT!-+-
I I I I I
I 1 i I I '
I 2 i 11 ! I
I I ! I
I ! i I I
1311\ I L
! 1! I 31
3111
! ! i ,
I i
I 11 I I
I T I
311 i I !
2111 I 1
I 111 21
i 21 111 !
I 21 11 i !
r-2i'1\--I-;-
------------ ;---j - r -r-F
I ! I ! I
I 11 Iii
I 3 i ! ! 11
1 j I i I
I I ! i
I I I I [
I 3 i I : 1\
r3!f:1i
I ! i I -r-
,.
1994 Objectives
i
12. iPublic Works Service:
A~!Perform preventative mai'!tenance on all equipment within 100 miles or 10
I hours of scheduled service
B. I Perform 90% of City buildin~pairs & preventative maintenance using City
I personnel
C. I Maintain or improve on helpfulness rating of Public Works personnel
(81"10 helpful to very helpful)
.
1 5. Traffic Control/Street Lights:
A. I Perform a cost efficiency study of street lighting system
-r
!
: SanitatlonlWaste/Removal of Weeds:
I Resolve all property clean-up complaints
i Resolve 100% of weed complaints
I
17. ITree Maintenance:
A. T Remove 100% of diseased trees o,! public property
at Respond to all property owners' request to identify diseased trees
C. I Maintain & trim trees on Citv propertY which present a hazard to public
I
1 8. I Parks &. Recreation:
A. IlnstalVreolace playground eouipment in two (2) additional parks each year
I in 1994 & 1995
B. I Make new playground equipment ha~icap accessible
C. I Implement mechanism to assist in funding park maintenance & imorovements
O. I Provide off-street parking for Cathcart Park
E. I Coordinate scheduling of fields with Minnetonka Community Services
F. ! Add andlor replace 5 .E!~nic tables per year
G. I Plant at least 10 trees p'er year
--I ---
.
16.
A.
B.
19.
A.
B.
C.
iWater:
I Supply a safe. clean uninterrupted source of water to all connections
I Study the feasibility of decommissioning Badger & Woodhaven wells
I Exolore possibility of interconnectino with other communities
20. I Sanitary Sewer:
~Work with MWCC to correct III into the sanitary sewer system
B. [Work with MWCC to reduce sewage treatment costS to the City
)0, "
: 2 t
.: ... ..; ~
I~: ~: E .t
-... ."""
" U u tJ
~ ; ~ .:~ g.. g
: g.'Z;~ ~~ ;
.. .tag lff.~ .
:.: :..:'...,~
:~,,~wt:ut:
~ ~1.JC1:.' ~
4' ~ 0 ; 0 8.: 8
o _" &.II
1994 Objectives
21.
A.
8.
C.
D.
i Recyclin :
i Continue week! pickup of rec cfable materials
I Increase pro ram participation throu h use of incentives
! HOld curb-side pick up of household & ard wastes in the Sprin
i Provide a leaf & ard waste disposal site in Fall of the ear
!
3! 1 :
I 1 :
:2
1 :
312 i 1 '
!
I
--."
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
This Statement is a
actions of Shorewood
point of reference
City Officials and
for all decisions
Employees.
and
Our Pur'Dose: to provide a value in municipal services, to assure
compliance with community laws and standards, and to keep citizens
informed of those services, laws and standards.
Our Goal: to serve our purpose in such an efficient,
that residents feel good about being citizens of
community.
friendly manner
the Shorewood
Our EX'Dectations: to accomplish
impartial fashionj be open, accurate,
pride in the job we do.
our goal we mus t serve in an
patient and courteousj and take
Let us know when we don't meet our expectations!
City Council
10/28/91
2/24/92
3/10/93
1/10/94
1/23/95
Action:
Approved
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
~~B
January, 1992
SHOREWOOD CITY VALUES
The Shorewood City Council, in its governing~ is responsible for
setting policies for the City, which a~mplemented by the
Administrator and City employees. Furthermore, the Administrator,
employees, and City Commissions propose overall goals, specific
objectives, service levels, and action plans for Council consideration
and direction.
This "team" makes decisions and acts based on a strong set of values.
The team values are:
· A strong sense of commitment to the City and its Statement of
Purpose.
· Open, democratic government, enhanced by an informed populace.
· Responsiveness to the needs and desires of the citizensi public
service.
· Fair and equal interpretation and enforcement of City Codes.
· A reputation for dependability and integrity.
· Teamwork and action oriented problem solving (acting rather than
reacting) .
· Striving for improved productivity and efficiency through new
technology and innovation.
· Employee selection by merit.
· Professional development.
· Respect for City employees who, wi th fair treatment, proper
training, and a willingness to let them excel, will take pride in
association with the City and serve the people well.
· The provision of accurate,
through proper channels,
made.
timely information to the City Council,
so the best possible decisions can be
· Adherence to professional, ethical standards of conduct.
ADOPTED BY THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL, MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1992
City Council
2/24/92
3/9/92
3/10/93
1/10/94
1/23/95
Action:
Reviewed
Accepted
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
.
.
.
.
CKNO
15181
15182
15183
15185
15187
15188
15189
15190
15191
15192
15193
15194
15195
15196
15197
15198
15199
15200
15201
15202
15203
15204
15205
15206
15207
15208
15209
15210
15211
15212
15213
15214
15215
15216
15217
15218
15219
15220
15221
15222
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JANUARY 23,1995 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 5, 1995
TO WHOM ISSUED PURFC6E
HENN CO DISTRICT COURT RON JOHNSON CONDEMNATION
US POSTMASTER 4th QTR U/B POSTAGE
US POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTERS
FIRST STATE BANK FED/FICA TAX
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST DEFERREDCOMP
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
AFSCME LOCAL #224 UNION DUES
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ANOKA CTY SUPPORT/COLLECT PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
MN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX
HAMLlNE UNIVERSITY TUITION
KATHLEEN HEBERT SEC 125 REIMB
KLEVE HEATING PERMIT REFUND
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONFERENCE-NEW ELECT OFF
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM DECEMBER SAC CHARGES
MN STATE TREASURER BLOG PERMIT SURCHARGE
BRADLEY NIELSEN SEC 125 REIMB
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
JOSEPH PAZANDAK SEC 125 REIMBIMILEAGE
SLAKE MTKA PUBLIC SAFETY JAN PYMTITRAF OFFINOV BOOK
CITY OF TONKA BAY INVENTORY
US WEST UTILITIES
WESTMARK DEVELOPMENT CR BALANCE ON U/B ACCT
MR. JAMES NELSON ESCROW REFUND
ROSS LARSON CR BALANCE ON UlB ACCT
BELLBOY CORP L1QUORlSUPPLlESlMISC
DAY DISTRIBUTING BEERtMISC
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEERtMISC
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO MISe
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO L1QUORIWINElMISC
HOOPS TRUCKING FREIGHT
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR CO UQUOR
LAKE REGION VENDING MISe
MN SUN PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING
NORTH STAR ICE MISe
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS L1QUORIWINE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEERtMISC
PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
MN DEPTOF REVENUE SALES TAX & PENALTIES
AMOUNT
$1,000.00
464.15
493.52
6,376.21
691.57
457.00
138.95
92.50
139.44
1,092.94
240.00
135.00
71.75
500.00
11,088.00
1,782.11
100.00
1,686.99
89.77
36,326.97
15,699.56
359.83
38.63
500.00
83.85
4,363.30
2,621.65
6,540.60
105.75
1,782.04
167,20
246.81
217.23
156.00
223.20
959.64
340.15
5,367.55
1,990.24
10,009.00
Page 1
.
.
,.J
CKNO
15223
15224
15225
15226
15227
15228
15229
15230
15231
15232
15233
15234
15235
15236
15237
15238
15239
15240
15241
15242
15243
15244
15245
15246
15247
15248
15249
15250
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JANUARY 23, 1995 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 5, 1995
TO WHOM ISSUED PURR:6E
ABEUB&C INC REIMB PERMIT APP
JAMES HURM SEC 125 REIMB
THE INNOVATION GROUPS GUIDEBOOKS
MCI COMMUNCIATIONS LONG DISTANCE
MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER
MINNEGASCO UTILITIES
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES
PEPSI COLA CO MISC
RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALIST YR END INVENTORY
STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTISING
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
BELLBOY CORP L1QUORtMISClSUPPLlES
BOSMA WESTONKA CARPET CARPET CLEANNAC REPAIR
BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBAC MISC
DAY DISTRIBUTING BEERtMISC
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEERtMISC
GOPHER STATE TRUCKING DUMPSTER SERVICE
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO L1QUOR/WINE/MISC
HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVo QTRL Y MONITORING FEE
BRIAN D. JAKEL REFUND PERA W/H
JOHNSON BROS LIQUOR WINE
LAKE REGION VENDING MISC
MARK VII BEERtMISC
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS WINE
QUAL TIY WINE & SPIRITS L1QUOR/WINE/BEER
R-FOUR STAR MISClSUPPLlES
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEERtMISC
THE WINE CO WINE
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
Page 2
AMOUNT
$32.80
173.58
97.95
13.72
14.38
47.00
270.34
39.45
125.00
224.67
48.93
1545.26
210.44
470.96
1260.90
3602.95
116.50
2516.89
100.00
4.87
99.84
116.97
2705.50
333.30
1354.21
56.40
2827.60
397.98
.
... ~-
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CHECK APPROVAL lIST FOR
JAN. 23, 1995 COUNCIL MTG
CHECr<:,j:r
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION
-..-.....-..--.-.-..-.--...-.--.-..----.-..-.---..- -.-..~._..__.._.__v.__._.._._.._._.__....___..__
1S.251 (;~I3DO"
(;~i3[)O ,
AND EICK AUDIT SERVICES
(~UDIT SEF\:VIC:E~3
(:IIJD I T SEF,~V ICES
(1IJO T T SE: Fi: V ICES
I~)UDIT SEPVICES
*** TOTAL FOP ABDO, ABOO,
(~rjD EICf<
15252 APPLIED GPAPHICS ASSOC.
NEWLETTEP PRINTING
15253 JEFF: Rf~INI~AR'T DBA
DEC: .J (~rj I TOF,' I (~L
15254 BIFFS, INC.
PonT(;~13lE TOILETS
15255 BOYEn TRUCK PARTS
~)HOP SUPPL I ES
.
15256 BUSINESS HEALTH SERVICES
I f...jS F~EG I STr~:(~T IOrj
15257 CARGIll SALT DIVISION
DCICIrjG S(~LT
15258 CHIEF'S TOWING, INC
TOI/.)ING
15259 EXCELSIOR-CITY OF
1ST QTn FIRE PAYMENT
15260 E-Z RECYCLING INC.
DEC r~~ECYCL I (...J,G
15261 FINA FLEET FUELING
F::UEL
15262 FnONTIER ELECTRIC
h'EL_OC(;~TE L_IGHT~3
15263 HANCE HARDWAnE:, INC.
PARK MAINT SUPPLIE:S
15264 HOPKINS PAnTS COMPANY SHOP SUPPLIES
Sf"IOP SUPPL.IE:S
*** TOTAL FOR HOPKINS PAnTS COMPAN
15265 lEAGUE OF MN CITIES LMC DIRECTORIES
15266 MAC WAREHOUSE COMPUTER EQUIP
15267 MAMA-LMC LABon RELTAlONS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
15268 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATEn FEB TREATMENT CHARGES
15269 CELLULAR TELEPHON CO CELLULAR PHONE
DEPT.
PFWF SEr~'
It.}(~~ TEF,~ DE
SEI/.}EF,~ DE
PI('10U r.jT
600. en
~s() ,. ()l
80,,0'
... .... .... ... m' .... W.. ... 120 ,. 0'
'W' ...' .... .... .... .... ...... 120 .. 01
.1,000.00
COUrKIL
('1Ur..j CLDCi
P(.~F,~f<.S &
l:-J UBI,..) f<. ::3
SN()I/') .:i{ I
PUB IIJf<'3
::no.4
3:2.~~1.. ()I
3<.t..~.S,~ ~3.:
~2t.:l '. (l(
30.01
1,579.71'
138..4'
REC'y'Cl I r..j
FIRE pno 29,267.5C
CITY G(~i~
CITY G{.'lf~
FJ (.~ R }<:. ~3 ~~<
4,370.. OC
437.1'
250.01
::;. ..Ie
PUB WKS 153.42
CITY GAR 97.7]
251.20
GEN GOVT 15S.1e
MUN BlDG 761.0C
ADMIN 2,313.0C
SEWER DE 39,116.01
15271 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
15270 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 4TH QTR WA SRV CONN FEE WATER DE
-------- 11.06
Ei'1ISSIOi-..j TESTS
15272 WM. MUELLER & SONS, INC. SAND
15273 MUNICI-PAlS
ANNUAL MEMBEPSHIP
15274 MUNITECH. TNC..
F::E:13 hPI T rjT
Page 3
CITV GI~~f~
SHOll') .~ I
(,i;::j'..j GOVT
V,,()TE::R DE
l,170.0C'
24.0(
<:{. (~.~:! .. (~/"
10" (iC
;:, " 72() " OC
.&. --
J i Y ,n ::;i'lC)h'[!,t,)CIlOiC>
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR
JAN. 23. 1995 COUNCIL MTG
CHEC:Kn
VEj",jDOf:;~ N(.:lf'1E
DESCh~ I PT I ()N
-..-..--.-----..--.-.-.-----.-.-.-..-.--.-
.-.-.....---.-.-.--..-.-.....-.....-.........-.---.-.-_.
F:: E [: f'i (;~ I i",j T
*** TOTAL FOR MUNITECH. INC.
15275 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE SHOP SUPPLIES
SHOP SUPPLIES
SI"IOP SUPPL I ES
*** TOTAL FOR NAVARRE TRUE VALUE
15276 N.I.S. COMMUNICATIONS
COMP M(.~INT
15277 PEPSI COLA COMPANY
POP MACHINE RENTAL
15278 POTTS. KENNETH N.
DEC Ph~OSECUT T Oi",jS
. 1,S.279 Pf7,)ECI~3ION COhPUTf::F~ ~:)YSTE:I'1 SOFTI/')(:ih'E: UPD(~TE:
15280 SAFE:TY-KLEEN CORP.
SHOP SI...IPPI._ I CS
15281 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE
Tf-?E:E Tf-?IMf'1Ii",jG
15282 SHORE WOOD TRUE VALUE
APPRECIATION GIFTS
15283 SUPERAhERICA
FUEL
15284 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC
hINUTES
15285 TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUPP SHOP SUPPLIES
.
15286 TaNKA BAY-CITY OF 4TH QTR WA/SW
4TH QTf~ ';.)(i/SI/')
*** TOTAL FOR TONKA BAY-CITY OF
15287 TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES PERMIT CARDS
15288 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC
I/')(;~ TEI~ TeST I i-'jG
15289 VIsu-seweR CLeAN & SEAL. 94 seWER CLeANING
15290 WARNING LITES OF MN. INC. SIGNS
*** Total Checks for Approval
*** Total Check Approval List
Page 4
DEPT..
(;~ i-1 () U j-'! T
.-.................-...........-...
SEI/.)EF,~ DC ::2 . 4~:lO .. (),
6.200..00
hUN BLDG 50.3
F) l~~ F? }.( ~~; 8, '/ ... ("
FJ(~F~}<.~) 8< .12:',. .51
71..57
i-'iUH i3LDG
t:l-()IS,. '7 (
f'iUf-,j i~lLDG
,LL ..:::.,
F) F~~ () f~ ~) E: F~
.1 ~ t.l._5rs '. 25...
:::: I (.j (:'i f'-'! C E
.5 .. ~2~
CITY G(.~f:"
90.5"
Tf-?EE (-'j(~ I
t1 ~ ~.~ ~;, :(~ .. 7~-
~::.4 ..1',
CI TY GAF.;
33':;1... 2.~:
PL(~r,jj'-.j T j-'jG
169.. 7'
CITY Gflf~
~2f; 'c .:::l(
1;.)r:~TEF,~ DE:SS8 ..1::
SEWER DE 172.0c
730..12
FJr:'~OT 1 (',IS
c..3 Ie '7(
l/.)r:~ TEF.; DE
20..0(
SEWER DE 14.346.3(
1.17,. S<.
11.5.967" 13
249,514.62
.... .. .,;.......
CHi: C K REG I S T E R
CHECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK
TYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT
COM 1 10 95 350 TIMOTHY J. CRUICKSHANK 208997 88.66
COM 1 10 95 475 ADAM W. DALUM 208998 16.16
COM 1 10 95 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 208999 611. 98
COM 1 10 95 775 JAMES C. EAKINS 209000 599.49
COM 1 10 95 915 JASON W. FRANK 209001 78.50
COM 1 10 95 1001 JOHN 11. FRUTH 209002 73.93
COI1 1 10 95 1115 AMY L GRAHN 209003 73.50
COM 1 10 95 1170 I1ARLENE S. HAPToNSTALL 209004 369.02
COM 1 10 95 1175 ALAN S HASKINS 209005 163.38
COM 1 10 95 1190 KATHLEEN A. HEBERT 209006 474.15
COM 1 10 95 1195 PAUL T. HEGG 209007 87.71
COM 1 10 95 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 209008 820.45
COM 1 10 95 1415 SHAWN O. HEMPEL 209009 56.28
COM 1 10 95 1550 JAMES C. HURI1 209010 1522.58
COI1 1 10 95 1601 BRIAN D. JAKEL 209011 101.52
. COI1 1 10 95 1700 JEFFREY A. JENSEN 209012 747.34
COM 1 10 95 1800 DENNIS O. JOHNSON 209013 767.83
COM 1 10 95 1950 t1ARTIN L. JONES 209014 40.49
COM 1 10 95 2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 209015 632.19
COM 1 10 95 2250 JASON N. KOERTING 209016 196 . 96
COM 1 10 95 2270 JOHN T. KOPISCHKE 209017 25.39
COM 1 10 95 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 209018 241.15
COM 1 10 95 2550 PETER W. LENZEN 209019 41. 56
COM 1 10 95 2555 TAMMY E LENZEN 209020 124.18
COM 1 10 95 2750 ALEX E. LOCKOVITCH 209021 34.63
COM 1 10 95 2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOWSKI 209022 789.90
COM 1 10 95 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 209023 154.89
COI1 1 10 95 2980 JILL M. MOORE-KUNZE 209024 97.07
COM 1 10 95 3000 THERESA L. NAAB 209025 602.62
COM 1 10 95 3100 LAWRENCE A. NICCUM 209026 866.34
COM 1 10 95 3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN 209027 1031. 55
COM 1 10 95 3500 JOSEPH E. PAIANDAK 209028 1041. 88
. COM 1 10 95 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 209029 828.97
COM 1 10 95 3701 BRIAN 11. ROERICK 209030 145.58
COM 1 10 95 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 209031 1143.16
COM 1 10 95 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 209032 405.21
COM 1 10 95 3910 R CONRAD SCHMID 209033 33.25
COM 1 10 95 4600 BEVERLY J. VON FELDT 209034 619.39
COI1 1 10 95 4610 LEA ANN M. YON FELDT 209035 200.89
COM 1 10 95 4620 NICHOLAS P. YON FELDT 209036 184.11
COM 1 10 95 4750 RALPH A. WEHLE 209037 595.64
COM 1 10 95 4780 LAURENCE A. WHEELOCK 209038 132.76
COM 1 10 95 4900 DEAN H. YOUNG 209039 656.84
COM 1 10 95 5000 DONALD E. ZORAIIL 209040 1224.27
UUTOTALsu:n
18743.35
Page 5