The URL can be used to link to this page

050994 CC Reg AgP (mnpu~~omaw ~~~~s at#-.~~V) ~u~~slssV 1~~l~al~ amT~-~~~d ~ ~o 6UT~TH aq~ aZT~oq~nv o~ uOT~oW v - a (uoT~nlosa~ pasodo~d ~t#-.~~V) L ^~~q61H a~~~s St~6t I~a~~~w I11H aUlA asua~l~ ~onbT~ ~1~W 6Ul~~~lxo~UI -UON 6U1AO~ddV uOl~nlosa~ ~ ~dopV o~ uOl~oW V - ~ (uol~nlosa~ pasodo~d St#-.~~V) p~o~ u~o~q~lms SLSv~ Iqnl~ ^~~uno~ ~~o~auulW sal~S ^~puns l~l~ads pu~ ~onbT~ 6ul~~~Txo~UI ~o al~S-uo asua~l~ ~onbT~ 6UT~~~Txo~UI 6uTAO~ddv uOT~nlosa~ ~ ~dopV o~ uOT~oW V - s (uol~nlosa~ pasodo~d Vt#-.~~V) p~o~ UMo~q~lms OSVV~ 16SZ# ~sOd uOT6a~ u~~l~amv qnl~ , ^~puns asua~l~ ~onbl~ 6ul~~~lxo~UI 6U1Ao~ddy uOT~nlosa~ ~ ~dopV o~ uOl~oW Y - V :ula~aq~ suoT~nlosa~ ~dop~ , ~pua6v ~uasuo~ uo sma~ 1 aAo~dd~ o~ uOl~oW - llallHf>ll JJflHSllOO . ( (sa~nuTW Z#-.~~V) v66t IS~ Il~dy - sa~nulW uOlssas ~~OM pu~ 6uT~aaw ~~In6a~ Il~uno~ ^~T~ SHiLMIIl ilO 'Iff ACRIddll . ~ ~pua6v ~alAa~ .~ sl~a~ ^~~aq6n~a ~aAO~S la~u~~s ~O^~W uosuas 11~~ 110~ .S a~u~16allV ~o a6pald .V f>llIiLHHJi 'II:J1ll10:J AiLI:J HllH111l0:J . t YCIHaf>Y .amT~ sTq~ ~~ ua~~~ aq Ill~ uOl~~~ ON .~~m~o~ uOTssas ~~OM o~ u~no~p~ Ill~ Il~uno~ ^~T~ aq~ 16uT~aam aq~ ~o U01~~od ~~In6a~ aq~ 6ul~0110d -X-el OE:L SRamNHO 'IIONOOO f>NI~aaX RY'Inf>B:R 'IIONOOO X~IO f>llIiLHHJi mr:r[Jf)mr OiL llHflO.lXIff . ~ UOT~~6T~T~ 6UTpuad uo uOlssn~sTa G3!m'1~S 1l0ISSHS HMiLIDHXH III Hl!lH111l00 .t Xel OO:L OYOR an'IO XR~OO SSLS XOOR aONaRa.mOO . t66-C '6 XU 'XYCIHOX NOISSaS aAI~nOaXa 'IIONOOO X~IO aOO&a:ROHS 40 X.IO .. (~uaUItt012:~::Pl) - SHIY'I:J .10 'IVAOHcIdV 00; .L:JH.l'f[DS .INWO.! NOISSHS YHOM 00; N1lDO.lml 0 gt - S.bHOcIHH 'II:JNllO:J AJJ:J aNfl HO.AlfH 0 vt - S.bHOcIHH .!GYiLS !V HOJNHiLSINIHav 0 Et (~~odaH ~}12~a ~t#_O~~V) UOST12T~ 'A~~aqDn12a qOH - ~~odaH ao~od ~S12~ ssaoov a~12~ a~~ uo uOTssnosTa SHDSSI .A:JI'IOcI NO NOISSn:JSIa 0 ~t P120H ~uTod SP~12M.OH - UDTS l112a~ aq~ uT DUTA121d ua~P1Tq~ uOT~n12~1I 12 ~O} ~sanDaH 12 }O uOT~12~aPTsuo~ HOO'I.I HILL HOH.I SHH.r.JNH 0 t t (aD12nDu12~ pasodo~d Ot#_O~~V) H:JIAHHS H:JI'IOcI HO.! .TJlHHHHHfJl[ SHHMOcI iLNIO.l' HHiL 00; iLN:iIHaN:iIHfl .10 NOIJNHHaISNO:J oot (~a~~a~ ~sanbaH 6#-0~~V) HfJHllH:J 4J,'IVNHcI 4J,I'IIiLD .10 aNll.!HH HO.! iLSHDOHH l[ .10 NOIJNHHaISNO:J 0 6 (mnpU12~omaw SI}}12~S aa# !~a~~a~ ~sanbaH va#- 0 ~~v) avOH lDIstlH:J HO.! AaIMS :JI.!.WHiL NO iLHOcIHH 0 a (aou12uTP~O pasodo~d L#-o~~V) s~~12d A~T~ ~O} s~uama~TnbaH DUT~~12d DUTP~12DaH ~uampuamv aou12uTP~O DUTuoZ 12 ~dopv o~ uOT~oW v aAT~12~uasa~daH Aq ~~odaH - fJNIRNY'IcI OL (~~odaH 9#-0~~V) sPTa ~O} aST~~aApv o~ UOT~12zT~oq~nv , lT12~~ P120H ~a~~12W Pl0 ~O} sU121d }O 112Ao~ddv }O uOT~12~aPTsuo~ aAT*12~uasa~da~ Aq ~~odaH - XHllcI 09 (sUOT~dO pasodo~d g#_o~~v) Aal~~12H aA12a Aq UOT~12~uasa~d H.INacID ~ONH:JHiL .10 NOIJNHHaISNOO 0 g (~~odaH v#_o~~v) uao~~ A~12~ Aq UOT~12~uasa~d Y:JIH !V OOW IOOW - .bHOcIHH iLIalIf[ 'IVl1NNf[ C66r 0 v ~uamaa~DV ~~E# !mnpu12~omaw sl~auu121d ~~12d t~E#- 0 ~~v) ~~12d u12maa~d uT aOTA~as DUT~sa~ lToS ~O} 06E/t$ }O ~unomv aq~ uT oour s~u12~lnsuo~ aw~ q~TM. ~uamaa~DV U12 DUTAO~ddv uOT~oW V - ~ (mnpu12~omaw sl~aauTDua dE#-o~~V) ~o~ DUT~~12d 1112H A~T~ uT DUTdTd }O uOT~121112~sur DUTP~12DaH ~uamaa~DV 112~uamalddns 12 aAo~ddV o~ uOT~oW v - d (uoT~nlosaH pasodo~d aE#- o~~v) aOTA~as aa~~ uads12V - asuaoT~ ~ammT~~ aa~~ 12 DUTAO~ddv uOT~nlosaH 12 ~dopv o~ uOT~oW v - a " z ;}O Z e612cI "66t '6 xu YaN:lf>Y 'I10NtlOO X.Ta10 · SNOI~YOI~dKI aad HO aSYSHONI XY~ Sa~YOIQRI .. ,I,NHJlWDOlXN . Z (mnpu~~omaw s.~aauJD~~ at#~.~~V) s~uamssassv T~J~ads s~uamaAo~dmI ~aa~~s a (mnpu~~omaw s.~auu~Td Vt#-.~~V) anssI ~a~~M ^~J~ ~o ~aJAa~ - v SHDSSI ,I,NHJlH.J1OHdJiI Til,I,IdY::J NO NOISSD::JSIa . t NOISSHS XHOM t ;Jo t eovd .66t '6 XYK NOISSaS xaO& ~IONOOO X.IO ~~ , .. .. ,.. ~ ,II.". , , \' ... :t ,< ~ t :( ... ,i 't; t. , ~.'.. -. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, KAY 9, 1994 AGENDA ITEM #3A: This resolution approves an annual intoxicating liquor license, Sunday & Club for the American Legion Post #259. All of the license applicants have met the necessary qualifications. AGENDA ITEM #3B: This resolution approves an annual intoxicating liquor license, on-sale of intoxicating liquor and special Sunday sales for Minnetonka Country Club. AGENDA ITEM #3C: This resolution approves an annual non- intoxicating malt liquor license for Vine Hill Market. AGENDA ITEM #3D: This motion authorizes staff to hire Heidi Mayas a Part-time Clerical Assistant conditioned upon successful completion of a background and reference check. Starting salary is $8.40 per hour without benefits. She will be working an average of 25 hours per week. AGENDA ITEM #3E: This resolution approves a tree trimmers license for a term beginning upon approval through December 31, 1994. AGENDA ITEM #3F: The City Engineer is recommending approval of a supplemental agreement clarifying the alternate items that the City will be completing. AGENDA ITEM #4: Gary Groen from Abdo, Abdo & Eick will be present to review the 1993 annual audit report. AGENDA ITEM #5: Dave Hartley will be present to review his strategy plan for technology updates and proposed three year implementation process. AGENDA ITEM #6: Staff recommends approval of the plans for the Old Market Road trail project per the Engineer's memorandum. The motion should include authorization to advertise for bids. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - MAY 9. 1994 COUNCIL MEETING paae 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #7: At the Council's direction, the Zoning Ordinance text amendment which provides the Council with flexibility relative to parking lot design requirements for City parks has been revised to include a provision requiring that such improvements be incorporated into the Parks Capital Improvement Program and reviewed annually. AGENDA ITEM #8: SLMPSD has monitored traffic on Chaska Road per a resident's request. Additional research has indicated the road is incorrectly posted at 30 MPH. The established speed limit is 35 MPH. If this road meets the criteria for an urban area, the speed could be reaffirmed at 30 MPH via resolution. If not, a speed study could be authorized with staff recommending a reduction in the speed limit from 35 to 30 MPH. AGENDA ITEM #9: Phil and Susan Johnson have requested a refund of ~ the utility penalty. Their letter of request is enclosed in the ~ packet offering an explanation for a refund. AGENDA ITEM #10: The enclosed proposed amendment to section 7 of the joint powers agreement was introduced at a Coordinating Committee meeting by Mayor Brancel. The amendment would require special policing needs of members to be approved by the Coordinating Committee. AGENDA ITEM #11: Howards Point Road area residents have submitted a petition requesting several signs to be placed warning drivers of children in the area. AGENDA ITEM #12: The LMCD has submitted the draft report of the 1992 Lake Minnetonka Lake Access Task Force (enclosed in your packet) . WORK SESSION . Time permitting, a work session is scheduled to discuss issues relating to municipal water and special assessments for street improvements. CIlY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CIlY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1994 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CIlY COUNCIL MEETING The meeting was called to order by Mayor Brancel at 7:30 p.m. A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Brancel; Councilmembers Benson, Daugherty, Lewis and Stover; Administrator Hurm, Public Works Director Drazil, and Planning Director Nielsen. . C. Review Agenda Daugherty moved, Stover seconded to approve the agenda for April 25, 1994, with removal of Agenda Item 6. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting - April 11, 1994 . Lewis moved, Benson seconded to approve the Regular Council Meeting minutes of April 11, 1994. Motion passed 4/1. Daugherty abstained. 3. PARK - Report by representative A Motion to Accept the Bids for the Silverwood/Freeman Park Improvement Project and Award the Contract Bruce Chamberlain, Park Planner, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., stated 5 bids for the Base Bid and Add Alternate #1 were submitted to the City for Silverwood Park improvements and Freeman Park trail. The low bid was submitted by Expert Asphalt with a Base Bid of $54,913.30 and $1,000 for Add Alternate #1 and compares favorably with the landscape architect's estimate of $59,626 for the Base Bid and $1,300 for Add Alternate #1. Chamberlain recommended acceptance of the low bid and that the contract be awarded to Expert Asphalt. Lewis inquired whether the contract includes landscaping. Hurm explained that landscaping work is a separate contract, will be done by volunteers and the City allocated $11,000 for ~~ REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 2 purchase of trees, shrubs, etc. and includes restoration and seeding. This work will be done simultaneously with installation of playground equipment. A number of volunteers have signed up to assist and the Tree Trust group will also assist with the landscaping work. Stover inquired whether the Public Works Department will participate. Chamberlain explained that a bollard designed to limit vehicle access will be constructed and installed by the Public Works Department. Daugherty moved, Benson seconded to accept the bids and award the contract for Silverwood Park Improvements and Freeman Park Trail, Project #PK-4-94, to Expert Asphalt, for a Base Bid amount of $54,913.30 and $1,000.00 for Add Alternate #1. Motion passed 5/0. 4. PLANNING - Report by representative Commissioner Pisula reported on the Planning Commission's April 19, 1994 Work Session. . A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a C.U.P. - Fill in Excess of 100 Cubic Yards. Applicant: Worth Construction. Location: 6100 Cathcart Drive. Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 94-39, "A Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Place Fill in Excess of 100 Cubic Yards for Bill Worth." (6100 Cathcart Drive). Motion passed 5/0. B. Pre application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Applicant: Lundgren Bros. Inc. Location: 26620/26750/27000 Smithtown Road. Nielsen prefaced the developer's presentation by explaining that this is an informational discussion as the first stage in the process of amending . the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate the proposed planned unit development. . Mr. Terry Forbord, vice president, Lundgren Bros. Inc., introduced Mark Anderson, project manager, and John Uban, principal project planner. Mr. Forbord stated that although little developable property remains in the City, Lundgren Brothers has assembled several parcels west of the Minnewashta School that, with good planning and construction of quality homes, can benefit the City at a residential low density rate of 1.3 units per acre. There are compelling reasons to allow a slightly higher density of residential development from 0-1 units per acre to 1-2 units per acre, which requires an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Forbord indicated the developer is willing to cooperate with the City relative to whatever type of water system is adopted that is economically feasible and assessed fairly. Using an aerial photograph, a general area map, and a general layout showing the wetlands, Mr. Uban described the properties, their location, the surrounding areas, and the respective density designations. He outlined the reasons, rationale and the benefits to the City for slightly increasing the density for development of the assembled parcels. The details are contained in Mr. Uban's April 21, 1994 letter to the City Council regarding reguiding of Minnewashta School Property. Additional documentation regarding the Preapplication for ~ ~:t\. , "".. I' REGULAR CIlY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 3 a Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is contained in Brad Nielsen's March 29, 1994 memorandum to the Planning Commission and City Council and in a document dated March 1, 1994 submitted by Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.: "Proposed Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for Ledin/Wartman/Minnewashta School Property of Shorewood, Minnesota, prepared for Shorewood's Planning Commission" dated March 1, 1994. . In general, the position of Lundgren Brothers is that a development consisting of the assembly of the three properties is more desirable than individual development of each parcel. Forbord explained that the parcel includes surplus school property and two pieces privately owned which when combined can be developed in an orderly manner instead of individual subdivisions. He stated that the cost of land in Shorewood coupled with increased development costs due to environmental considerations and assessments for the proposed water facilities, render these parcels economically undevelopable without increasing the density to allow for 36 units. Therefore, without increasing the density, Lundgren Brothers cannot develop this site. The Councilmembers discussed the proposal and the Lundgren Brothers representatives responded to their questions and comments. . Stover agreed that development of the property as a planned unit development with a looped street would be appropriate. However, she disagreed with the need for increased density because the type and size of single family homes contemplated require large lots. Stover noted that increased density could possibly be acceptable for affordable housing, but agreed it may be difficult to develop such housing. Forbord responded that because of the high cost of land and infrastructure improvements, new affordable housing does not exist in Shorewood or in the Metropolitan area. However, he pointed out that this problem is a social issue that cannot be addressed relative to this proposal. Further, he explained that Lundgren expects to construct homes in the mid-price range, similar to the Shorewood Oaks development, for which a market exists. Uban stated similarities exist with the adjacent Brentridge development which has a 1.7 density/acre; Lundgren is requesting a 1.3 or 1.4 density, 60% of the site is open space, and the site has unique characteristics. Brancel stated she would be agreeable to the proposal given the similarity with Brentridge which also abuts the wetland area. She inquired whether it would be permissible to vary the density on the property. Nielsen stated that considerable flexibility is available within a P.D.D. in terms of lot sizes. Daugherty agreed with Stover's concerns, particularly with regard to maintaining a lower density for residential development as land for development in Shorewood dwindles. He indicated a willingness to consider a slight increase in density but as close as possible to the density designation of the property. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 4 Lewis agreed that unless the City becomes involved, affordable housing may not be feasible in Shorewood. He stated he liked the concept of the development, it is well-thought out, but the zoning/density issue obstructs it. He indicated that he tended to agree that larger density is more desirable, was not opposed to the development but was not convinced about the density. He suggested that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration of the merits of re-zoning the property in conjunction with the Commission's current overall review of zoning issues. Benson agreed with Lewis' remarks. He questioned the need for higher density and agreed the matter should be considered by the Planning Commission. Stover stated she understood the economic elements of the development and that occasionally the Council may take other. factors into consideration when contemplating density changes, but that economic gain for a developer would not justify an increase in density. She agreed that the proposal should be referred to the Planning Commission for its further review. Lewis stated that this development when viewed in the context of others in Shorewood is . not much different and that if this proposal does not gain approval because of the density issue, the three properties are likely to be developed piece-meal in a less complete fashion. He indicated the Planning Commission should consider the density issues relative to the City's remaining developable property. Nielsen stated that this development has been designated as a P.U.D. in the Land Use Plan and noted that generally the standards for P.U.D.s are negotiated during the development process. C. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Parking Requirements for City Parks. Nielsen reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment which would relax the design standards for parking lots in City parks. Flexibility to would allowed surfacing, curbing and striping work to be delayed or possibly waived primarily because of the high cost of paving . large areas. For example, he explained that the City Hall/Badger Field parking is a year- round, heavy traffic joint use area, whereas Freeman Park, a limited seasonal use area, has extensive parking areas that would be expensive to pave. Following the Planning Commission's review and a public hearing, approval of the amendment is recommended. Lewis stated that a considerable amount of money is spent for park development and to make a rule that the parking area may not be developed up to the standards for other City development concerns him. He indicated that provision for this aspect of park development including necessary funds should be incorporated into the park plans and suggested that specific language be made a part of the ordinance to assure that such improvements are completed in a timely manner. Lewis supported functional parking in the parks and stated it is part of the park and even though use of the parks may be seasonal, use is during the time when dust becomes a problem. Stover agreed with the desirability of timely completion of surfacing, curbing and striping and inquired about costs of the various work. Nielsen explained that the ordinance as . . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 5 amended does not preclude the City from completing such items, but allows flexibility to delay such work until funds are available. He indicated that when the Council approves a park plan or reviews the capital improvements program, the cost for such work may be incorporated at that time. He reviewed the benefits of curbing, striping and surfacing in park areas and commented on the costs of such work. Daugherty stated that changing the standards for City parks is important to allow for additional flexibility because it is necessary to be direct about making developed parks available in the City. While parking in parks may be nice, Daugherty indicated that the seasonal use of parks suggests that such work be completed after the park is fully developed and when funds are available. He supported the amended ordinance providing for additional flexibility. Park Commissioner McCarty stated that funds are not available for the completion of paving, curbing and striping. The Park and Planning Commissions are concerned about the deviation from City standards, however, parks are currently being developed to the extent possible given available funds. Benson and Brancel agreed that the City's capital improvements program should address the needed funds to provide for surfacing, curbing and striping in the parks. However, it was noted that accelerated use of the parks with summer sports activities suggests that some provision for dust control be considered. Stover moved, Daugherty seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. _, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1201 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Zoning Regulations." Motion failed 3/2. Lewis and Brancel voted nay. Following discussion, the Council agreed to refer the proposed ordinance amendment to the Park Commission to develop specific language to provide that completion of the surfacing, curbing and striping of parking areas in the City's parks be incorporated into the City's capital improvements program. D. A Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amendment Regarding Chapter 1201 - Park Dedication Fees. Stover moved, Lewis seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 290, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1201 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Zoning Regulations." Motion passed 5/0. E. Site Plan Review - Proposed Park & Ride Lot at Vine Hill Road Intersection. Nielsen explained that the Comprehensive Plan identifies park and ride lots as a way of enhancing mass transit service in the community. He noted that the Council recently approved a part of the City Hall parking lot to be used for a park and ride location. Together with the MTC, MNDOT proposes to overlay the former Burger King parking lot REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 . PAGE 6 for use as a park and ride location which was acquired by MNDOT in connection with the Vine Hill road/Highway 7 intersection reconstruction project. Nielsen stated the design plans have been reviewed and the proposed lot is consistent with zoning standards. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions relating to curbing, lighting, maintenance, and landscaping. Stover inquired what the City's costs will be and requested clarification on the encroachment. Nielsen stated there will be no costs to the City; all costs including maintenance will be borne by the MTC and MNDOT. He explained that the minor encroachment involves an existing building that encroaches on the property and it is likely that customers and employees of the Video Update will make use of the parking lot. Nielsen indicated that MNDOT appears to be unconcerned about the encroachment and is likely to make some adjustments to the property line. A shelter and public pay phone may be added in the future after evaluation of the use of the park and ride. Lewis moved, Benson seconded to approve the park and ride lot as proposed by MTC and MNDOT, subject to the conditions recommended by the staff. Motion passed 5/0. . 5. A MOTION TO APPROVE A REOUEST TO CHANGE ANTENNAS ON THE WATER TOWER. CELLULAR ONE Lewis moved, Stover seconded to approve the request of Cellular One to replace existing antennas located on the City's southeast area water tower. Motion passed 5/0. 6. REOUEST OF RESIDENT TO CORRECT TRAFFIC ENCROACHMENT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. REMOVED FROM AGENDA 7. REVIEW OF STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE REPLACEMENT AND HIRING OF A LIGHT EOUIPMENT OPERATOR A. A Motion Regarding Staffs Recommendation on Filling the Light Equipment Operator Position REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 7 Hurm brought the Council's attention to the Public Works Department, Light Equipment Operator Needs Analysis prepared as requested by the Council. He stated the analysis concludes that the Light Equipment Operator position should be filled, therefore, he recommended filling the vacant position. Public Works Director Drazil responded to Lewis' questions about the analysis. Lewis inquired whether current staff possess the necessary skills to fill the vacant Light Equipment Operator position. Hurm stated that none currently exists to provide the needed mechanical skills. Daugherty moved, Stover seconded to authorize the hiring of a Light Equipment Operator for the Public Works Department. Motion passed 5/0. B. A Motion Regarding the Filling of the Light Equipment Operator Position . Daugherty moved, Stover seconded to approve hiring Candidate #1 contingent upon successful completion of the remaining requirements and should any problems arise with those elements, Candidate #2 be approved for hire contingent upon successful completion of the remaining requirements. Motion passed 5/0. 8. MAITERS FROM THE FLOOR - None. 9. DISCUSSION ON POLICY ISSUES - None. 10. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS - None. 11. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS . Request for Reconsideration of Donation of $1,000 to 1994 Fourth of July Celebration as Budgeted Benson moved, Brancel seconded to reconsider the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce request for a $1000 donation to the 1994 Fourth of July celebration (denied due to failure of motion at 04-11-94 Council meeting). Motion passed 4/1. Stover voted nay. Brancel explained that the Chamber has inquired why the Council denied the financial support requested for the annual celebration. She reiterated her support for the donation because it is a small price to pay since three-quarters of the City's residents attend this event. Stover reiterated her position that tax funds should not be donated by the Council and stated that in the pasts, she has made personal contributions to support the event. Lewis stated this particular function is beneficial to Shorewood residents and supports the donation. Benson stated that although he has been concerned with past occurrences, he would support this donation. REGULAR CIlY COUNCIL MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 8 Benson moved, Brancel seconded to approve a $1000 donation to the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce for the 1994 Fourth of July celebration as budgeted. Motion passed 4/1. Stover voted nay. 12. ADJOURN TO WORK SESSION FORMAT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Lewis moved, Benson seconded to adjourn the City Council meeting to a Work Session format subject to approval of claims at 9:05 p.m. Motion passed 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Arlene H. Bergfalk Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial . ATTEST: BARBARAJ.BRANCEL,MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CIlY ADMINISTRATOR . . . CIlY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL WORK SESSION MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1994 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 9:15 P.M. MINUTES WORK SESSION 1. JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Brancel at 9: 15 p.m. Present: Mayor Brancel; Councilmembers Benson, Daugherty, Lewis and Stover. Planning Commission Chair Rosenberger; Commissioners Bean, Foust, Malam, Pisula, and Turgeon. Admimstrator Hurm and Planning Director Nielsen. Review of Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Chapter Nielsen directed attention to the Land Use Chapter Summary covering the text which has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Nielsen read the City's land use goals and the summary of the goals, objectives and policies which serve as a guide for how land within the City is to be developed and used. Rosenberger acknowledged the work of the Planning Commissioners and the input of Council Liaison Lewis in the development of the Land Use Chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the Councilmembers as the City's elected officials need to make decisions regarding the sensibility and acceptability of the Commission's recommendations for development and use of land in Shorewood. The Council and Commission participated in a discussion regarding the recommendations including extensive discussion regarding development of senior housing in Shorewood. The Councilmembers generally accepted the recommendations reflective of the City's land use goals, objectives and policies as outlined in the Land Use Chapter Summary dated 4/94 and agreed to meet with the Planning Commission in a joint session on May 23, 1994 for further discussion. 2. ADJOURN Daugherty moved, Benson seconded to adjourn the work session at 10:50 p.m. Motion passed 5/0. CIlY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES April 25, 1994 - PAGE 2 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITfED, Arlene H. Bergfalk Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial ATfEST: JAMES C. HURM, CIlY ADMINISTRATOR BARBARA J. BRANCEL, MAYOR . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 94-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE SUNDAY & CLUB WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, sections 402.02, 403.05, 1300.01 and 1300.02, provides for the licensing of the sale of intoxicating liquor in the City and requires a special license for sunday sales; and . WHEREAS, said Code provides that an applicant shall c~mplete an application, shall fulfill certain requirements c@ncerning insurance coverage, and shall pay a licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily cQmpleted an application, and has fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a special "Club License" for the "on-sale" of irlttoxicating liquor and for a special license for "Sunday Sales". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Shorewood as follows: That a special Club License for the "on-sale" of intoxicating liquor and a special Sunday License for sales be issued for a term of one year, from June 1, 1994 to May 31, 1995, consistent with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 400 of the Shorewood City Code, to the following applicant: Applicant Address American Legion Post #259 24450 smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . ADOPTED by the City Council of the city of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1994. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: J~mes C. Hurm, city Administrator/clerk ~3fl I i Minnesota Department of Public Safety Liquor CO~7(i~1 '}J::! ~:c:t :;;:-r;rove. Qr PS 9016 (4193) LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 190 5th St. E., St. Paul, MN 55101 r6Ia",::'13 [,,,/ 1:,;;;:;",; l:,;\i! in,; $:'::0 (612) 296-6434 TOO (612) 297-2100 Retailers IC8nt~:'i:"2rjon C2Jd H::9 is receivGd by MN i..:qu::;r Control. , APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON SALE RETAIL L1aUOR LICENSE , i I This ap~lication shall be completed by an officer of the club seeking a license. This application and the proof of liquor liability i~surance must be filed with the city clerk or the county auditor. To qualify for a license a club must have at least fifty me~bers. been in continuous existence for at least three years, have an elected governing board and limit sales to member$ and bona fide guests only. The annual license fee is set by statute (M.S. 340A.408). Granting of a license by the city dr county is discretionary. LICENSEI9'S SALES & USE TAX 10 NUMBER 9503600 To apply for sales tax number call 296-6181 or 1-800-657-37n TYPE OR PRINT Corporation N,me Club Trade Name or OBA Clarence Clofer Post 11259 Am. Legion American Legion Post 259 Iltcense Locatl~n (Street Address) License Period BUSIness Phone 24450, Smithtown Rd. 474-398L . From 6-1-94 To 5-31-95 (612) MunicIpality County State Zip Code Shorewood, Mn. Hennepin Mn 55331 Building OwnElrs Name BUIlding Owner's Address Clarence Clofer Post 11259 Am. Legion 24450 Smithtown Rd. Shorewood. Mn. 55331 Club Manager's Name Are there ~ny delinquent DYes ~ No Anna Thole taxes on tfi1e property? Name of Member of Managing Board Address James'F. Herkal 6-29-24 24995 Glen Rd. , Shorewood, Mn. 55331 Name of Memqer of Managing Board Address Kenneth L. Dallman 10-2-45 5780 Eureka Rd. , Shorewwod, Mn. 55331 Name of Memb~r of Managing Board Address Baylor;l J. Leifermann 5-17-31 5775 Grant Lorenz Rd.,Excelsior, Mn.5' Name of Memb~r of Managing Board Address The Lice~see must have one of the following: . CHECK ONE lKJ A. !Liquor Liability Insurance (Dram Shop) - $50,000 per person; $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 for loss of means of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF iINSURANCE" TO THIS FORM OR D B. A Surety bond from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified above in A. OR D C. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having a ma"rket value of $100:000 or $100,000 in cash or securities. Give Date bf Club Charter Oate of Incorporation Number of Years of if Veterans or Fraternal 1919 1927 Continuous Existance 75 Organizati~n of the Club Number ofiYears in Number of Club Will the Club Qe I Current Q4arters 30 Members 430 Issued a Lawful KXYes o No i i GamblinQ License? i 3: 1. Are any members, officers, agents or empolyees paid profits from the sale of beverages to club members? No 2. Are any employees paid salaries? Yes 3. Has this club or any employee been convicted of a violation of Federal or State law or local ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages? No If so, give names, dates and violations 4. Does any wholesaler or manufacturer of alcoholic beverages own or have any interest in furniture, fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises? No If so, give details 5. During the past license year has a Summons been,.issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop) M.S. 340A.802? 0 Yes ~ No If yes, attach a copy of the Summons. 6. Will you serve liquor on Sunday? !XI Yes 0 No Amount of Sunday License Fee $200. GO I certify that I have read the above questions and that the answers are true and correct of my own knowledge. ~ 'i'h, ~~ Mgr.. Am. Legion Post 259 3-;;)9-9<( Signature of Applicant Date IF LICENSE ISSED BY THE COUNTY BOARD; REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNf;Y I certify that to the best of my knowledge the applicants named above are eligible to be licensed. DYes 0 No If no, state reason I Signature County Attorney I County I Date REPORT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT OR SHERIFF'S OFFICE This is to certify that the applicant, and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as follows Police Depanment or Sheriff's Name Title Signature License 0 Granted LICENSE APPROVAL OR DENIAL o Denied License 0 Granted o Denied SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY AUDITOR DATE SIGNATURE LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR DATE IMPORTANT NOTICE ALL RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST HAVE A CURRENT FEDERAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP. THIS STAMP IS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIRE ARMS. FOR INFORMATION CALL 612-290-3496. . . CITY OP SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 94-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR , SPECIAL SUNDAY SALES WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Sections 402.02, 403.05, 1300.01 and 1300.02, provides for the licensing of the sale of intoxicating liquor in the City and requires a special license for Sunday sales; and WHEREAS, said Code provides that an applicant shall complete an application, shall fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage, and shall pay a licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily completed an application, and has fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a license for the "on-sale" of intoxicating liquor and for a special license for "Sunday Sales". NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Shorewood as follows: That a special Club License for the "on-sale" of intoxicating liquor and a special Sunday License for sales be issued for a term of one year, from June 1, 1994 to May 31, 1995, consistent with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 400 of the Shorewood City Code, to the following applicant: Applicant Address Minnetonka Country Club 24575 smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1994. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk .;F3B Minnesota Department of Public Safety LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 190 5th St. E., St. Paul, MN 5510 I 3585 Shorewood ONSS Minnetonka CC Assn. Inc. Minnetonka Country Club Box 360 Excelsior, MN 55331 05/31/94 $7,500.00 $200.00 ALL LICENSEES MUST HAVE A $20 RETAILERS BUYERS CARD RENEWABLE EACH YEAR. NEW LICENSEES CALL 612-296-6431 FOR APPLICATION AND INFORMATION. H032tl LICENSEE'S SALES & USE TAX ID NUMBER 8LL 78417 To apply for sales tax number call 296-6181 or 1-800-657-3777 CITY OF Shorewood ISSUt~8NV{T~FORITY Hennepin . ensee Name (Corporation, Partnership, Individual) DOB Trade Name or DBA nnetonka Country Club Assn. Inc. Minnetonka Country Business Address City 2 Smithtown Rd. (PO Box 360 Excelsior) Shorewood License Type (check one or both) License Period . On Sale XX Sunda From 6-1- On Sale License Num er On Sale Fee Sunday License Num er 1-93 7 500.00 1-93 Club Zip 55331 County Hene in Business Phone 474-5222 If a Partnership, State the Name and Address of Each Partner; If a Corporation, State the Name and Address of Each Officer I Partner Officer Name (first, middle, and last) DOB Title Address 9/30/1 DOB 11/8/1 DOB PO Box 218 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Partner Officer Name (first, middle, and last) Ruth B. v-li trak Partner/Officer Name (first, middle, and last) Address same Address The Licensee must have one of the following: eck one: (ATTACH CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE TO THIS FORM.) Liquor Liability Insurance (Dram Shop) - $50,000 per person; $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 Property Destruction; S50,OOO and $100,000 for Loss of means of support, lor :0 B, 1 lor Dc. A bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as specified above in A. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having a market value of S100,OOO in sh or secur'tie Duril!K the p~t license year has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (DRAM SHOP)? 10 YES XX NO If yes, attach a copy of the summons. ICOMPLETE THOSE ITEMS THAT APPLY jrRANSACTION TYPE 0 NEW 0 REVOKE/CANCEL ENEWAL TRANSPER 0 SUSPENSION , DATE OP REVOCATION/CANCELLATION DATES SUSPENSION From To ADDRESS CHANGE PROM TRANSPER OP OWNERSHIP PROM (NAME AND ADDRESS) I CERTIFY THAT THIS LICENSE WAS APPROVED IN AN OFFICIAL MEETING BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OR COUNTY, City Clerk's Signature Date IMPORTANT NOTICE ALL RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST HAVE A CURRENT FEDERAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP. THIS STAMP IS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS. FOR INFORMATION CALL 290-3496. 1'5'1011,6-93) Control #1993152 026 Oli9 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 94-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, sections 402.02, 403.05, 1300.01 and 1300.02, provides for the licensing of the sale of non-intoxicating liquor in the City; and WHEREAS, said Code provides that an applicant shall complete an application, shall fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage, and shall pay a licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily completed an application, and has fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a license for the "off-sale" of non-intoxicating liquor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: That a special for the "off-sale" of non-intoxicating liquor be issued for a term of one year, from June 1, 1994 to May 31, 1995, consistent with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 400 of the Shorewood City Code, to the following applicant: Applicant Address Vine Hill Market 19215 State Highway 7 Shorewood, MN 55331 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1994. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk ;rx No. 2:t.l'h-St"te Form J()9. BUSINess RECORDS CORPORA TION. MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA Combination Application for Retailer's (On-sale) (Off-sale) Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License C 177 O,F" Si/o,(cwOCJD CO/wiy of HI;""'A.'t iJ/N 1.___...:zzlt!1.c-l.. .Y-.I!.'(~_______.._____m..__.._.___. of 11" ,'ily.__ JJ>>- of S/lotfEc-<./ooo ,county of //E"vAJc';'/N ,Staf~ 01 ..l!i."""sot,t, Itereby make "pplicntion lor a Retailer'., {.2.-..'<-j. (Off-.mle) .von-into.vicatint! .llait !.iq"or I,i,'""-,,, 10 -"'11 -"u.h .If,,lllt',,,,or un,f,or "/1tI'Jlu..""nt to an or</"'/(/I/,.,. (r".wl"lion) "a.....'</ 1111 ,.itll ",,,,,,,'il. ,.o""III''''''r</ of__S#.~~."",.CJ_OJJ c/1"!!.^'!,,~.-!.'OTr9 ._._._ .m__.____..._.. ..; Mul Chupler 340, .lfinnesota Statutes 1945, as amended, providing for lice'ft8in~ and redulatin~ .the '0 III of non-intoxicatin.i! malt liquor. Vltrin/! the fJrMt fit'e yeruw, my residence h,M berm. as follows: _d7'12.S- tJud: fi!.1M-f L/J-NE, 5?!o-ecf.,1/0CLP 7'" UIC__ Name 01 He~n.tn.. authority tcounty) (eity) /WN SS3J/ I was born /9<<6- pt"r.... ';<.2 /9'19 nL ft1 C'/1,jp? C<< 71-/ 6.EAc# . Clly III E (..(/ .:T/-;(Jl 7' Uoroucb Town State or Count.,. I am. ~ ( _...W) citizen of the United States. 10m man'ietl. .11 y t[wTje']j (husbanc/'s) name and addrcss is 6/JtC /3/1;(;:} tf. /./L~ _._.:(.2 'i Lr t1 ~ of ,e I D (f c (..I,) ..S,frne! v</ rnf 0 1"'7/V I am. proprietor. VINe dILL /I1/1;f!rt T Oay Y.ar Firm was incorporated in the state of Corporation is authorize,l to r10 hl/.sine8s in ..Ifinnesota. License is for (street) (highu'ay) located Q.8 follow.: FI.;?IS I-/wy 7. SilotfcwtJC>O fr7N The license ldll be in connection witlt Dru. Store. Cale. R"laurant.. Hotel. Club !.i'Melt has been in operation Months y..... /Jr '#YS,!'LF ficor. The e.~to,bli..hnunt is loea.ted on th'3 . The b'Mines., 111'cmi..,es 'Lre owned by TIte taxes on the prope,.ty o,re not delinqlu'nt. I am A,/l71 engaged in the retail Bale of intoxi.catind liquor. I Ita,lIe Ai <!: II ~..c had an application. for license rejected as follows: I hal'e never been convicted of a felony nor of l'iolating any National or Btate Uquor law or loeal ordfna.1tCe relati.ng to the manufacture, sale or tra'ft8portation, or possession for Bale or transportation 01 ,into.ricatin~ liquor. Gambling or gamblind devices will not be permittt'Jd on the licensed premises. I am. the owner of the lea.schold, furniture, fixtures, and equipment in the premises for which, the license is applied, e.'f:CCpt I have no intention or agreement to transfer the license to another person. I submit the following names of persons. including a hank, for reference, with whom I have had business relations ae {ollows: 806 I/JIEJ'< R,€fT Jl71-rc! d/hvk of ~X'aG..l/CJ~ /?cf s /lw1l/ 1'1'0 ,ft!J,.J /j1NI' NOf<:1';oJ 7zJ!M a 0 f- C tf,v ~ y; .6L o~",y, /1'0/ 6-7~W /4 ^' I ~ tV 0 I intend to engage in the salo of intoxicating liquor and will bave a Federal Oeeupatlonal Tax Receipt in accordance with the ordinance governing thia Iicenae. My Federal Tax Stamp Receipt is No I will comply strictly ..dth the provisions of the ordinance relating to the .ale of soft drinks for "mixing" purpose. and will serve patrons in full view !If the public. I agree to waive my Constitutional Rights against search and .eizure and will freely permit peace officers to insr,ect my premises and agree to the forfeiture of my license if found to have violated the provision. of the ordinance (re.oolut on) provldin~ for the granting of this license. I hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the be.t of my knowledp and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of the ordinance under which this license i. gran~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~ day uf . 19_ NOTF.: t.i('('ni""~ mav h.. iuued onlY' tn pf'fRon!'l who Rr~ dtiunll of the nited Sh.les and who are or I(ood moral C!h.r8cter and reput.e. who hav~ nllnin("r1 lhr :lll" ..r 21 YPAr" Rnd who arp propriplorlll of th" f'l'It"blishment. (or hi~h tht' IitensP8 af'P iflflUM. l.awlI l!J.Cg. c. 700. ~ . . ~ ~ " ~ 2\:! ". " t>] ~ {l " I~' ~ '" ;:l ~ ~~~ ~ ~ fY\ ~ 'Z ~ ~ ~ ~ l:) ~ 1'-'4 ~ ~ v .E' ::I (> "= ...... o ~ ~ ~ :;. ~ t:t. ::I flq ~ ~ "'i ('l) S .... rn ('l) Ul t"'l .... ~ ('l) ::I rn ('l) .... r ~ " (. ... ..... r r ~f 'I ~ f' l" ~ ~ ~ rr, ~"\ ~ '" ., Il.. ~ t:--. .... ~ ""i .... C ~ ~ l), c:;:; ~ c::: , ~ ~~ C '>1 ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ::=I ~ M Q ~:: ~ ~ c. ..... r.-. =: ~ ::: " M <- tA. Q ~ tla o '>1 ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ & c '>;j . 'O'/D1l8 Q1{1 pu'D Ii~onr ~1l'TIaD Q1{1 /0' 1l0?1'DpuQ1U1U0 -ou tl~?-Un Q1{1 1'T101f.1]111 ImlW!7 R.1l'D /0 lIOU'l>>I6/1"! Q1{1 01 11l:1I11l00 77'D'1{B pJ.'DOfl1lmax 01l puv '1lmax 'l{O'TIB /0' p.i.vo1l1lOla.L" Q1{1 10' 11l:1I11l00 Q1{1 1'T101f.nm 'IltnO.L" 1i'Il'D 111 :17'DB ..to'/ :1II1lW)1 ntB'1 77'D'1{B p..t'Dall R.11l7laD aK ::11aK U&ULl]V1{D . liff ~..t:17D 1lma.L" p:J1va .IlO K.JJ.OX HEX .IlO a21rOll KAJ.O.L" H/U -Sf' 1B:J11r '--Sl' '1lO?fDO'!2dd'o 1l'!"lnm Q1{1 1l] .ml Mlddv 1I111l:1O?1 lI'I{1 /0 lIOU'l>>l8'1 lI'I{1 01 11lllll1la:> P'!P /0' liz>p Q1{1 ua 1lon-n1O'n..t R.q '~V18 pu'D ~1l7laD P'!VB 111 .IlO K.JJ.O.L" /0' 1lma.L :J'I{1 10' p..t'OOll1lmO'x Q1{1 1'D'1{1 P:J1I11..tfKJ R.q:J..tll'l{ '11/ dO .r.L"KflOO . '9S{ '1110~3UU'W: )0 31111~ D].l:J'l{F, 1i:J1l..t011r 1i11l7laD -Sl' "UU1W' 1V 'P91V(J '8n1l]9'TIq P'!VII 10' l=puoo :J'I{l 0'1 81l]1V'[:J..t 1I1l~'TIi1:J..t puv IIm'Dl Q1{1 "l11fT11i1d1UOO 171m l1l'DI>nddlJ Q1{1 11lQ1U8rm! ..t7la U]1V1{1 '[J'U'D 'J.tm/)'!7 8'1I.11'D:J'!xa1u1 .1.0' ~7 17'D1U i1U]1~u1-u.01lIa :17'011 Q1{1 01 P1l11'Dll1J. m'Dl R.U'D 'P91V'[O?a 'U0?1V:J'!1ddv '1"{1 10' ~vp :11{1 0'1 J.o!J.d 9J.'D:J1i flll1J 10' PO?.tlld '0 1l1"l11fT1 '101l /I"lJ'I{ 1U'D:J'!1ddv P'!'DII 1'D'l{1 flP'Mmou'J[ J.'TIa /0' 111:1q Q1{1 0'1 P1l1..tVllddv 11 '1l0?1'W -l1ddV tl1"i11fTl Q1{1 puQ1U'WOOfI..t R.qfl.lQ1{ '1i1"mOO P'!VB 10' D'/D1l11 pu'D IillUJ.011'D li11l'TIoo 'plIU8]1I..t:Jp-II.71 91f..L" ~ 10' 1l1U11OO '1110~aUUnllf )0 31111<i' ,- - ~. . . TO: Mayor & City Council /[2J Teri Naab, Deputy Clerk ( FROM: DATE: May 5, 1994 RE: Recommendation on a Hire as a Part-Time Clerical Assistant The top two candidates chosen for this position are as follows: Candidate #1: Heidi May 3465 Chippewa Road Hamel, MN 55340 Candidate #2: Keri Prescott 7082 Pontiac Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 We recommend that the City Council approve the hiring of Candidate #1 contingent upon successful completion of a background check and reference check. Heidi has been able to spend a few hours with us this past week to assure us and herself that this is the type of position she is seeking. She is very cordial and seems to enjoy working with the public. Upon Council's authorization to hire, she will submit her two week notice to her current employer. In the event there is a problem with any of the remaining elements of the process, we recommend that the Council authorize Candidate #2 contingent upon successful completion of the same criteria. 42194.3 t3b . , ~_.. ./~. ~.:) FOR CFr=ICc USE CNLY CITY OF SHOREWOOD I Mala _n-1 C_ 'Norx Location ~ EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . We wdcome you as an applic:mt for employment. Your applic:uion will be considered with others. It is the polic'! of the Clev of S'aorewooG chat applic:ults and emploYees will not be diSCriminated against on the basis of mce. color. cr-wed. religion. national origin: sex. marical scarus. status with regard. to public assistance. membership or activicy in a loc:tl cormnission. disabilicy or age in all aspectS of our pe:sonnel policies. progr.:uns. pmctices and operations. Tnis policy applies to full-time. pare-time. temporal',,! and se:1Sonal employment. The inrormation contained in this application will be considered personal and conridential and used only in conjunction with your possible employment. Ple:1Se furnish us with complete infornwion. You are encouraged to attach any additional information which you believe qualifies you for the position. .e use INK OR TYPEWRITER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Type of work applying for: Permanent x Part-TIme Date Available: 'N 11-\l\ l'\~~. 2. "\M.I<- "" 1)"'f \ L<::.... Temporary se:isonal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0 . . 2. PERSONAL INFOR..\fATION ................ .......................... ...._.....og'eo.. 3. NAME -11 1:>. \I L:lst I t\f\ D"i First \D \L\'\ -E.. \.l.~ Middle ............... ................. ........... .........00. . PRESENT ADDRESS 3-\~f) C:-t\\~~ ,;~ ~D S tr-..::t \-h:=\ ~'Y\.e:. L City ~l~ State 5 ~~WO ZIp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... S. Home Phone No. L.v\'2 -l..\~-Csz.~1/ Work Phone No. /t;/;,( -.lf7S--;l,d./1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ........ ...... ... .....0....0. 6. Are you a citizen of the United. States? ~ No If you are not. do you have Bureau of Immigr.l.tion approval to work in the U_S.? (If hired by the Cicy. you must show proof of eligibiliry.) Yes No ... ............ ..... ............. ....... ............. i. Are you willing and available to work over-.ime or shift work? ~ No ..... ............ ....... ..... ...... . . . . .. ..... ..........0...... 3. EDUC~TIONAL INFOR..\iATION: ................ ..... ........................... . . . . . . . . C:rc:e the highest g~ce corr.!J!e~::d Gnde Schoo! 123456i3 High School 9 10 11 i2 or GED C:Jl1ez,:: 13 @- 1.5 16 P-:lst Gr-du:lte MA ?::D ...................... . . . . . " . " . .. .. . . " . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . Cle:::k Us! Ye:tr Did You COlTlDlctoi Grnduar.e? ~Yes o No 1'. ~ Yes .:D t!jJt tJ i /I/>. o No. 1 2 3 4 DYes o No. EDUC>\TION School Name .mi Address of School Course of Study High "'t- D Se n e r...(l ~...~iC~ h.~;c....... I College. ~~~.~ V ~ry,cu,,-\- fVl ~ Other (Specify) Special Skills and Qualifications List any correspondence cOtmeS, special courses, seminars, 'WOrkshops, training, and skills acquired chat might relate to this POSition. and summarize special job-related skills and qualifications acquired from employment or other experience. List any current licenses, registnltions, or certificates that you possess. Include drivers license number, class and State of Issue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANTS FOR CLERICAL~ ADMINISl'RATIVE & FISCAL POSmONS ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typing Ability: ...B Yes 0 No 40 WPM Shorthand Ability: 0 Yes g No Business Machines and Experiences: ..:rBm ...f CP/)7}~fmbu"S WPM Boolckeeping Experience: 'NCl-_h,? c.+hy,,- + \'1OvVl '?e~e.~C'.\~, \ Cl-..cCO'--'....-:;.+<. . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANTS FOR LABOR & SJ{TT T .F.D TRADE POSITIONS ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Apprenticeship(s) served or trades learned: wl'aoie of operating the following equipment: Employment Experience Start with your present or last job. Include any job-related milirary service assignmentS and volunteer activities. You may exclude organiza- tions which indicate race. color. religion. gender, national origin. handicap or other protected status. Employer 1. -5, /V Address 775 ~.. L. .. c.::5I" IV~l' Telephone Nurnber(s) -47s~- 22/1 ~ Employer 2. LA "-e.2S', Address '1"\ \..;Y"'\o.- . 3. Job Title \V\ " '. \.\ \I\\~ Supervisor -::S-Ch~?D...->-;e LL- _. T Reason for Leaving g, t,-~ tV l't,')LL- t! . -c Employer Address Telephone Nurnber(s) Job TItle Supervisor Reason for Leaving Dates Ernolo ed From I To Work Performed t-i .l .u r:2. - / tv ' b :71::>-\- !:J. ~lP" cP..... Dates Ernoloved From To v:; cr/ Work Performed 1.;- HourI \,) c... -rt s \-4\7. U<2-. ..;.~ <.ic.m bC&;~_ 5 ,L:.c .,-. t) .C 2-, Dates Ernoloved From I J10 HourI Rate/Salarv To Work Performed ~ ~~ I c.J.nL " Slartine J..fi Final ti,L 5.00 .,.z. '~\j_ Work Performed From Houri Slartin If you need additional space, please continue on a separate sheet of paper. Have you served a sentence in jailor been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony for which a jail sentence could have been imposed? You may answer "no" if the conviction or criminal records have been annulled. sealed, set-aside. or purged or if you have been pardon- ed pursuant to the law. DYes ~ No If "yes.', please attach a separate sheet with explanation, Infonnation concerning this question will not be used to automatically bar you from employment. ~ " - . Applicant's Statement I certify that answers given herein are true and complete. I authorize investigation of all statements contained in this application for employment as may be necessary in arriving at an employment decision. This application for employment shall be considered active for a period of time not to exceed 45 days. Any applicant wishing to be considered for employment beyond this time period should inquire as to whether or not applications are being accepted.at that time. I hereby understand and acknowledge that, unless otherwise defined by applicable law, any employment rela- tionship with this organization is of an "at will" nature, which means that the Employee may resign at any time and the Employer may discharge Employee at any time with or without cause. It is further understood that this . 'at l1ill" employment relationship may not be changed by any written document or by conduct unless such change is specifically acknowledged in writing by the City. In the event of employment, I understand that incomplete or inaccurate information given in my application or interview(s) may result in discharge. I understand, also, that I am required to abide by all rules and regula- tions of the employer. This employer has the right to verify information provided in this application. False information may subject . an applicant to rejection for employment and the penalty provisions of applicable Minnesota Statutes. -1J(/;:P' J)J ,/)kt, ;; 4 ':) c. L(' --.)-7 Signature of Applicant / Date II FOR PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT USE ONLY II . APPLICANT - Do not write below FOR INTERVIEWER'S USE INTERVIEWER DATE COMMENTS FOR TEST ADMINISTRATOR'S USE TESTS RAW ADMINISTERED DATE SCORE RATING COMMENTS AND INTERPRETATION i I I I I I I I I FJR CF;=lCE USE ONLY CITY OF SHOREWOOD WorK Lccation Rare EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Position Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . We welcome you as an applicant for employment. Your application will be considered with others. It is the policy of the Ciry of Shorewoc chat applicants and emploYees will not be disCriminated against on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin. sex, marital scuus. statuS with regard to public assistan~. membership or activity in a local commission. disability or age in ail aspects of our personnel policies. programs. pncrices and opentions. This policy applies to full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employment. The information contained in this application will be considered personal and confidential and used only in conjunction with your possible employment. PlC3SC furnish us with compler.c information. You are encouraged to attach any additional information which yoti believe qualifies you for the position. Please use INK OR TYPEWRITER. e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Type of work applying for: x - Permanent x Part-Tune Date Available: 3 - 2:3 - ~ LI Temporary se:isonal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...0.0.... 2. PERSONAL IN'FOR...\4ATION ...................... .............00. ................... 3. NAME Pf2..E:5. Co '/1 Last kgJ~T" First P. UiH Middle ....... ......... ....... ................. 4. PRESE.1>IT AD DRESS . 10 <32- Stre:t PON T fA C Clf(. CtfArJ HFtSS .?N, N;J 5" S"31 - City State Zip, . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... 5. Home Phone No. Work Phone No. 5L/L-o/36 ................................................................... lflO-l Lf 19 6. Are you a citizen of the United States? Q No If you are not. do you have Bureau of Imm~n approval to work in the U.S.? (If hired by the City, you must show proof of eiigibiliry.) Yes No ............. ............................ ... ....... . :. .^":. ~~ ~~~~ ':'~ ~~~l: ~ .~~ .~~~ ~r. ~ .~r~~. . G . No ..... ................. 8. EDUCA.nONAL INFORMATION: .................... ....................... ........ .......-. Crcie the highest gr:J.ce comple!:d Gr:ld~ Schooi 123456,3 High Sc~ 9 10 UVr GED ~_~e ~\15 16 ....... Pest Gr.;uu:lte MA ?hD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ................. ............ High Check Last Name and Address of School Course of Study Year Did You COlIlDleted Graduau:? ~.rlQOL I 2 3 4 DYes ,5'53 Y:5" o No L .tl. D~6-/'...,; '-( ;'?i L6C1ZAL I ck'1tA L ~Yes A/Zr..5 At2T5 I 2 3 4 o No. IC;~I uJ ortD [V CJ~ 0 Ato ,,';-5 S / rJ 6- I 2 3 4 DYes p,?. () (6)/ "'Kr o No. /1'3'3 EDUCATION School College' Other (Specify) Special Skills and Qualifications ' List any correspondence courses, special courses, seminars, workshops, training, and skills acquired th~t might relate to this poSitio. and summarize special job-related skills and qualifications acquired from employment or other experience. ,SA LC:S AN/) '2 / (.- ""2.. I (-LA.-, ANu / List any current licenses, registr.ltions. or certificates that you possess. Include drivers license number, class and State of Issue. fv1lfvI\I ,': 50 /A [)/Z / Vc'71 S Li c.. r-: Ai 5 c: .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANIS FOR CLERICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE & FISCAL POSmONS ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typing Ability: J4. Yes 0 No 5 0 .{- WPM Shorthand Ability: 0 Yes ~ No Business Machines and Experiences: A()f)/Nr... I'1AC.H/"/E~ (' ALGUiA rv/Z_,/ WPM Bookkeeping Experience: BA"J,( 5 TMTMf-?'Jr.5 . , C~~/Z.AL L:CD(~t:-n. ,4GGrv;J"S ,.t)1'1''-1Ach.c .,. /.:?.T(.J~/VlI-6u:S, ~FLoNC..I(./;vt.- . . M::7N77fL-"'f ~~O/!.IS ffNO (: LD..,>/IV6- en..,..,.. ~ l'i:n/oO. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANTS FOR LABOR & S:rm T .F.D TRADE POSITIONS ONLY Apprenticeship(s) served or tr.ldes learned: Capable of operating the following equipment: , ~ . ../~.tcant'sStatement ..~- T.~ /~ " I certify that answers given herein are true and complete. I authorize investigation of all statements contained in this application for employmem as may be necessary in arriving at an employmem decision. This application for employment shall be considered active for a period of time not to exceed 45 days. Any applicant wishing to be considered for employmem beyond this time period should inquire as to whether or not applications are being accepted-at that time. I hereby understand and acknowledge that, unless otherwise defined by applicable law, any employmem rela- tionship with this organization is of an "at will" nature, which means that the Employee may resign at any time and the Employer may discharge Employee at any time with or without cause. It is further understood that this "at will" employment relationship may not be changed by any written documem or by conduct unless such change is specifically acknowledged in writing by the City. In the evem of employmem, I understand that incomplete or inaccurate infonnation given in my application or interview(s) may result in discharge. I understand, also, that I am required to abide by all rules and regula- ions of the employer. This employer has the right to verify information provided in this application. False information may subject an applicant to rejection for employmem and the penalty provisions of applicable Minnesota Statutes. . CJ / ~ ~-er~/ Signa ure of Applicant ,3.- 2g-7'5L' Date II . FOR PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 'I APPLICANT - Do' not write below FOR rNTERVrEWER'S USE INTERVIEWER DATE COMMENTS FOR TEST ADMINISTRATOR'S USE TESTS ADMINISTERED RAW DATE SCORE RATING COMMENTS AND INTERPRETATION /~.tployment Experience ., . ... Start with your present or last job. Inc1ude any job-related military service assignments and volunteer activities. You may exclude organiza- tions which indicate race, color, religion, gender, national origin, handicap or other protected status. 1 Employer ,..- Dates Emploved . ,t1INNe5or~ !-oot) + ti~i?fZAc:..-G:"" From To Work Performed Address n P;; I Lr AA4-A} L"W _....,..., =-1\J r Telephone Numbcr(s) -. Hourlv Rate/Salary olf L- - 0 ( 33 Staninsz Final P, r-}K ,0:- S tEe 1'<..c- ~ () He: Job Title I S~isor D DFFIGC;- /"-fA.v4C-r:1? -.J 1M I /1..':5 c 0.,-, Reason for Leaving QUI OF !3VS//VESS Employer t<. I tJ tZ"" Dates Employed . ! 1) e (AN From To Work Performed Address N J tVN GTO,..J t<.,4 P.o, Box j) i ~ .~J::' st.?C A2c~ (.)1'"""1;;:- Telephone Number(s) Hourlv'Rate/Salarv Stanin2 Final Job Title Coo(l~D. I Supervisor (" DO/tit'.. &,()()frtl VQLa)....~ .:Too:!:" SUfWA-t:I-z.... Reason for Leaving r /V~7Je7J 7b MAKr MOlZ.e HO/'v'C'~ , EmPlayerpl 4S50C, Dates Emploved Work Performed 'f<.e; cn Tr + From I To Address I (JL~P :::~ ;!!.i?~,-}l'1e-. Telephone Numbcr(s) Hourlv Rate/Salarv i Stanin2 Final Job TItle I Supervisor Reason for Leaving ,,:Sap EMhOl1aJ - Employer /'1u iVl1'L hl?e f 6.51.)/11-7'"'1-/ Dates Emploved I1/NA/c'::'oTA From I To Work Performed Address lfaw/l..' G,.z.. ~.<. /1/J"NG7DI\MA HN /J{ ,~f:r 5-eT ~ri"<LIr1 .:- . , Telephone Number(s) Hourlv Rate/Salarv Swtin2 Final JSTItle Ilgp, I Supe~r 8/lr"J I CI< .... ALeS 011'1 Reason for Leaving f71, 6~rVl CoNi..OvJ 2 3. 4. If you need additional space, please continue on a separate sheet of paper. Have you served a sentence in jail or been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony for which a jail sentence could have been imposed? IV C You may answer "no" if the conviction or criminal records have been annulled. sealed, set-aside. or purged or if you have been pardon- ed pursuant to the law. o Yes X No , If "yes", please attach a separate sheet with explanation. Information concerning this question will not be used to automatically bar you from employment. . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD RESOLUTION NO. 94-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE FOR TREE TRIMMERS WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code section 305 provides for the annual licensing of tree trimmers in the City; and WHEREAS, said Section provides that an applicant submit a letter of intent and fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily completed this process and has submitted the requirements for the issuance of a License for Tree Trimmers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Shorewood as follows: That a License for Tree Trimming be issued for a term from May 9, 1994 to December 31, 1994, to the following applicant: Applicant Firm Name Address Aaspen Tree Service 970 Wayzata Blvd West Wayzata, MN 55391 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 9th day of May, 1994. Reed Baley Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk ~~ Ov...., 1'1A'r' 04"34 15:57 OSt'1 1'1F'LS.. 1'1t-l . . F.Z May 4, 1994 OSM Orr Schelen . . ~eron& .t\sstV'iaf~,1nc. 300 Park place Center 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416-1228 6l2'5~&-5775 1-800-753-5775 rAXS95-S774 Engineers Architects Planners surveyors Honorable Mayor and City Council Qty of Shorewood 5755 Country Cub Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: City Hall Parking Lot Supplementary Agreement City Project 93-1 OSM File 5047.06 Dear Mayor and Council Members: At the April 11, 1994 meeting, the City Council awarded the referenced project to Hardrives, Ine., with the understanding that. the city was exercising its option to perform some of the items in the Alternate Bid. The Contractor has since signed the contract involved (which explicitly states that the city can do any or all of the alternate items), and this proposed motion simply "cleans Up'l the contract and the funds encumbered to the CODtracor. We recommend approval of this motion. Please call me at 595.5695 with any questions. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES .~ ./ , Joel A Dresel, P.E., LS. City Engineer enclosure H:\ClVll.\NM\8NOINEER\.IAD\un'l'l2RS\00\0S}.l.MCM iff3F EqU,d Opportunity Employer r'lH'( 04' '34 15: 5:3 OSt'1 t'lPLS. Mtl P ..., .~ F .., r-,~-.. QS\\~~~ April 29, 1994 300 Park Place center S17S WaymtiJ. Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55416~ 1218 612.595-5175 1-80~ 753-5775 F.a.x 595.5774 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Mr. Steven Hall Hardrives, Ine. 9724 10th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: City Hall Bituminous Parking Lot, Storm Sewer:and Appurtenant Items City Project No. 93-1 OSM Project No. 5047.06 Dear Mr. Hall: . Enclosed is a copy of Change Order No.1 which includes modifications to Alternate No.1 bid for the referenced project. . ,. TheOty of Shorewood shall exercise its option, according to Division I specification 01010, to delete some of the items provided for in Alternate No. 1. The items provided for in Alternate No. 1 shall be changed to include Line Item 16, 2105.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement only, and all other items shall be deleted from this alternate bid. Please sign the enclosed Change Order No. 1 and return to the City Engineer. If you have any question regarding this project, do not hesitate to call me at 595-5695. Sincerely, . ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON &;/~ ~e], P.E., L.S. Shorewood City Engineer Enclosure cj J:\~.D6\CIV1L\COAAES\04~.H1 tq\.l~l OpportUnity ~mpJo)'er ._..' t MH'( 04' 94 15: 58 OS~l r-'-lPLS _, 1'11'1 P.4 QS\t =& AsSoclateS,lnC. 300 Park. Place center 5775 Wayzata Soulevard Minneapolis. fl..1N 55416- 1228 612-595-5775 1-800-753-5775 FAX 595-5774 CHANGE ORDER Change Order No: 1 City Project No. 93-1 I Project: City- Hall Bituminous Parking Lot, Storm Sewer and Appurtenant Items. OSM Proiect No. 5047.06 Owner: City of Shorewood Date of Issuance: April 29, 1994 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . Contractor: Hardrives. Inc. Engineer: Orr~heJen-Mayeron 9724 10th Street and Associates. lne. Plymouth. MN 55441 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents: .riPtfon: Delete all items provided for In Alternate No.1, except for Item No. 16.2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement, from the contract, Purpose of Change Order: Owner optron to delete some or all items provided for in Alternate No.1, according to Division I specification 01010. Attachments (list doCuments supporting change): CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE IN CONTRACTTlME Original Contract Price: $105,799.00 OrIginal Contract Time: N/A Previous Change Orders No. ..:.. to No. .: Net Change from Previous Change Orders: . - N/A Contract Time Prior to this Change Order: Contract Price PrIor to this Change Order: $105,799.00 N/A Net Increase (Decrease) of this Change Order: Net Increase (decrease) of Change Order. ($21.929,00) N/A , Contract Price with all Approved Change Orders: Contract Time with Approved Change Orders: $83,870.00 N/A Recommended By: Approved By: (Engineer) (Contractor) APProv'?!' /' d 7. - Approved By: Date of Council Action: ,:/(CIri Engineer) (City Manager) Engincc:r.I . Alc:hilt~\.$ . P1annc:r.> . Surveyor.> .,- . . Hoisington Koegler Group lne. mm DII MEMORANDUM April 26, 1994 To: Jim Hurm From: Bruce Chamberlain, Park Planner Re: Geotechnical testing for tennis courts and picnic shelter at Freeman Park. As we requested, Mr. Merv Mindess of GME Consultants, Inc. has submitted a proposal to provide geotechnical testing for future development at Freeman Park. Mr. Mindess recommends three test borings in the tennis court area and one in the picnic shelter area. The proposed fee is $1,390. Please note, as described in the proposal, there may be additional costs if soil conditions require that borings go deeper than the estimated 15 feet, or if bore holes encounter groundwater and require special backfill material. As part of this project, the Shorewood Public Works Department would need to grub two truck access paths to the boring sites since the tennis court area is heavily vegetated. This can be a fairly simple task since there is an existing nearby trail. GME Consulting has provided excellent service to the City of Shorewood in the past and the fee is commensurate with the work performed. Therefore, I recommend acceptance of the GME proposal. Enclosed are two copies of the proposal. If you decide to proceed, please sign one copy and send to GME and keep the other copy for your records. Please contact me if you have any questions. Enc. geofree.mem Land Use / Environmental · Planning I Design ~ 36/ 7300 Metro Boulevatd I Suite 525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 · (612) 835-9960 · Fax: (612) 835-3160 April 25, 1994 GME CONSULTANTS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1400021 st Ave. No.1 Minneapolis. MN 55447 Phone (612) 559-1859 / Fax (612) 559-0720 [I", E. City of Shorewood c/o.Mr. Bruce Chamberlain Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. 7300 Metro Boulevard, suite 525 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 RE: Proposal for geotechnical exploration for the proposed new tennis courts and picnic shelter at Freeman Park in Shorewood, Minnesota . Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit a proposal for this proj ect. In this proposal, we present a description of our understanding of the project, an outline of the scope of services we are to provide, and a fee schedule and an estimate of charges for these services. pro;ect Description This phase of development at Freeman Park will include construction of three tennis courts and a picnic shelter near the center of the park. The tennis courts will have a bituminous pavement. The picnic shelter is intended to be a relatively lightly loaded structure of concrete and wood frame construction. Final grades for the tennis courts and the picnic shelter have not yet been set. We understand that extensive cutting or filling is not anticipated. In order to design these facilities, information is required regarding the soil and groundwater conditions. . Field Exploration You have requested that four borings be drilled, three for the tennis courts and one for the picnic shelter. The borings for the tennis courts would be drilled to a depth of 15 feet and the boring at the shelter would be drilled to 20 feet. We are to locate the borings by measuring from the fence around the Little League softball diamond to the south. Our crew will shoot surface elevations at the borings referenced to a convenient benchmark on or near the site. Before we drill, we will contact Gopher state One Call to locate underground utilities. We plan to drill the borings with aCME 550 or 750 all-terrain rig. Our crew will keep logs noting the methods of drilling and sampling, along with Standard Penetration Values, preliminary soil classifications, and observed groundwater levels. Representative portions of recovered soil samples will be sealed in jars to reduce An Equal Opportunity Employer WilLIAM E. BlOEMEN0.41 PI= MERVYN MINOESS. 2 STEVEN J. RUESINK. 13 G WilLIAM C. KWASNY, RE. GREGORY R. REUTER. RE. MARK O. MlllSOP THOMAS PAUL VENEMA. RE. WYATT A. GUTZKE. RE. SANDRA J. FORREST City of Shorewood 2 April 25, 1994 moisture loss, and returned to our laboratory for examination, testing, and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer. Under Minnesota Department of Health (MOH) regulations in effect since May 10, 1993, boreholes which are drilled to 25 feet or deeper, or boreholes which encounter the groundwater table, regardless of depth, or boreholes which penetrate a confining layer at least 10 feet thick, must be backfilled with tremie-placed, neat-cement grout. A copy of the MDH regulations explaining this policy is enclosed. For this project, we cannot yet determine whether either or both of the latter two criteria would be met, it is not feasible to present a set price for this special type of grouting. In a later section of this proposal, we present a unit price per lineal foot of borehole for placing MDH grout by tremie. Geotechnical Report In our laboratory, a Geotechnical Engineer will examine and classify the recovered soil samples and prepare the boring logs and the report. We anticipate that the testing would consist of determining the moisture content, organic content, and unconfined compressive strength (by hand penetrometer), or soil shear strength (by Torvane) of selected samples. . In the report, we will describe the soil and groundwater conditions and present recommendations for preparation of the tennis court subgrades and for the picnic shelter foundation. We will discuss removal of topsoil and other poor soils that may be encountered under the tennis courts, and placement of select compacted backfill. We will discuss the frost susceptibility of the soils and give procedures for keeping the soils from freezing and also for maintaining the court fence posts and the net posts from being raised out of the ground due to annual frost action. For-the picnic shelter, we will discuss feasible foundation methods and also review the frost susceptibility of the soils. . Our report will conclude wi th a discussion of construction considerations related to foundations and earthwork for the project. Fees Based on the scope of services outline above (4 borings, 65 lineal feet of drilling, MDH grout, preparation of geotechnical report), we will charge the following fees subject to the condition noted. MObilization/demobilization of all-terrain drill rig, drilling and sampling, laboratory testing, report preparation $1,390 City of Shorewood 3 April 25, 1994 MDH grout backfill in boreholes, if required $ 2.50/lin.ft. Park Board personnel are to clear the existing heavy vegetation from the work site, so that it is accessible to our drill rig. If additional borings or deeper borings are needed, or if engineering and testing are required beyond that needed for preparation of our geotechnical report (i.e., post-report consultation or pre-bid meetings), our fees will be billed at the unit prices shown on the enclosed fee schedule. Environmental Concerns . This proposal is presented for engineering services to determine the structural properties of the soil at the specified site. This proposal does not cover an environmental assessment of the site, nor environmental testing of the soil or groundwater, nor a wetlands assessment. If you wish to have us provide these additional services, please contact us. If we detect a possibly hazardous substance at the ground surface, in a boring, or in contact with or in the groundwater, which in our professional opinion, could pollute surface waters or the groundwater, we have a legal obligation to notify the state of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. This must be done in accordance with the provisions of statute 115.061, "DUTY TO NOTIFY AND AVOID WATER POLLUTION." . It is our understanding that this notification must be "immediate," usually interpreted by the Agency to be within 24 hours of discovery. We will attempt to notify you, our Client, first to have you do the notification. If you do not assure us that you will do so, or if we are.unable to contact you in the required time limit, we will then be obligated to notify the state directly. The requirements of this statute supersedes the usual practice of client confidentiality, and Client agrees to hold GME harmless from any consequences arising from such notification. Authorization ~e are submitting this proposal in two copies for acceptance. When it ~s accepted, we ask that one copy be signed by an authorized representative of the party responsible for paYment for these services, and that this copy be returned to us as our authorization to proceed. We have enclosed with this proposal a copy of our General Conditions. The terms contained in the General Conditions are incorporated herein and are an integral part of this proposal for professional engineering services. Acceptance of this proposal by the authorized signature, verbal authorization, or issuance of a Purchase Order, indicates that you understand and accept the terms and conditions contained in this City of Shorewood 4 April 25, 1994 proposal, including the terms and conditions in the General Conditions. We recommend that you review the enclosure from the Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers, which presents information regarding geotechnical engineering proposals. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please contact us. Sincerely, Engineer . Enclosures: ASFE Notes Regarding Geotechnical Engineering Proposals MDH Notes Regarding Grout Backfill Fee Schedule General Conditions ACCEPTED: DATE FIRM AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE . TITLE WCK:kdc GME CONSULTANTS, INC. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING PROPOSAL As the client of a consulting geotechnical engineer, you should know that site subsurface conditions cause more construction problems than any other factor. ASFE/The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences offers the following suggestions and observations to help you manage your risks. Have Realistic Expectations If you have not dealt with geotechnical issues before, recognize that site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken, at the time they are taken. The data derived are extrapolated by consulting geotechnical engineers who then apply their judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions, how they will react to construction activity, and appropriate design of foundations, slopes, impoundments, and other construction elements. Even under optimal circumstances, actual subsurface conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock, and time. Develop The Subsurface Exploration Plan With Care The nature of a subsurface exploration program - the types, quantities, and locations of procedures used - plays a large role in determining the effectiveness of a geotechnical engineering report and the design based upon it. The more comprehensive a subsurface exploration plan, the more information it provides to the geo- technical engineer, helping the engineer reduce the risk of unanticipated conditions and the attendant risk of costly delays and disputes. Even the cost of subsurface construction may be lowered. Geotechnical design begins with development of the subsurface exploration plan, a task that should be accom- plished jointly by you and/or your professional representatives and the geotechnical engineer. Mutual develop- ment helps assure that all parties involved recognize one another's concerns and the available technical options. Clients who develop a subsurface exploration plan without the involvement of their geotechnical engineers may be required to assume responsibility - and liability - for the plan's adequacy. Read General Conditions Carefully Most consulting geotechnical engineers include their standard general contract conditions in their proposals, and it is common for one of these conditions to limit the engineer's liability. Known as risk allocation or limitation of liability, this approach helps prevent problems to begin with, and establishes a fair and reasonable framework for handling them should they arise. Various other elements of the general conditions explain the geotechnical engineer's responsibilities, in order to help prevent confusion and misunderstandings, and assist all parties in recognizing who is responsible for different tasks. In all cases, read the geotechnical engineer's general conditions carefully. Speak with the geotechnical engineer about any questions you may have. Have The Geotechnical Engineer Work With Other Design Professionals Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a geotechnical engineering report. To help avoid misinterpretations, retain your geotechnical engineer to work with other project design professionals who are affected by the geotechnical report. Ask the geotechnical engineer to explain report implications to those design professionals affected by them, and to review other design professionals' plans and specifications to consider the manner in which they have incorporated geotech- nical issues. Although other design professionals may be familiar with geotechnical concerns, none knows as much about them as a competent geotechnical engineer. Realize That Environmental Issues Have Not Been Addressed If you have requested a geotechnical engineering proposal, it will not include services needed to evaluate the likelihood of the site being contaminated by hazardous materials or other pollutants. Given the liabilities involved, it is prudent practice always to have a site reviewed from an environmental viewpoint. A geotechnical engineer cannot be responsible for failing to detect contaminants when the services needed to perform that function are not being provided. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Obtain Construction Observation Services Most experienced clients retain their geotechnical engineers to serve throughout the project's development. Involvement during the construction phase is particularly important, because it permits the geotechnical engi- neer to be on hand promptly to evaluate unanticipated conditions, to conduct additional tests if required and _ when necessary - to recommend solutions to problems. In addition, the geotechnical engineer can monitor the geotechnical-related work performed by contractors. It is essential to recognize that the construction recom- mendations included in a geotechnical engineer's report are preliminary, because they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Because actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork, geotechnical engineers need to observe those conditions in order to finalize their recommendations. Only the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report is fully familiar with the background information needed to determine whether or not the report's recommendations are valid. The geotechnical engineer submitting the report cannot assume responsi- bility or liability for the adequacy of preliminary recommendations if another party is retained to observe construction. Rely On Your Geotechnical Engineer For Additional Assistance Most geotechnical engineers who are members of ASFE are fall),iliar with a variety of techniques and approaches that can be used to help reduce risks for all parties to a construction project, from design through construction. Speak with your geotechnical engineer not only about geotechnical issues, but others as well, to learn about approaches that may be of genuine benefit. You may also wish to obtain certain ASFE publications. Contact an AS FE member or ASFE itself for a complimentary directory of AS FE publications. A5PETHE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 COLESVILLE ROAD/SUITE G106/SILVER SPRING. MD 20910 TELEPHONE: (301) 565-2733 FACSIMILE: (301) 589-2017 GME CONSULTANTS, INC. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BOREHOLE BACKFILL REGULATIONS - MAY 10, 1993 Subp. 3. Additional requirements. The commissioner may specify well location and construction requirements more stringent than those specified in this chapter if the commissioner determines, based on an assessment of hydrogeologic conditions and contaminant characteristics, that additional requirements are needed to protect the public health or prevent degradation of the groundwater. 4725.3700 [Repealed] 4725.3750 REPAIR OF WELLS AND BORINGS. subpart 1. Repair or seal. The property owner must have a defective part of a well or boring repaired, including broken, punctured, or otherwise defective or unserviceable casing, screen, fixture, seal, or well cap. A well or boring not repaired must be permanently sealed. . subp. 2. Materials. Materials used in maintenance, replacement, or repair must meet the requirements of this chapter for new installation. Subp. 3. casing removal. When all casing is removed from a well or boring, the installation of new casing or the reinstallation of casing is considered new construction and must meet the requirements of this chapter for new construction. Subp. 4. Acid treatment. Before acid treating a well or boring, all confined spaces must be blown out with fresh air before entry and a supply of fresh air must be provided during occupancy. When there is a question of adequate fresh air supply, a self-contained breathing apparatus must be worn. . 4725.3800 [Repealed] ~ 4725.3850 SEALING WELL OR BORING ~ Subpart 1. sealing with grout. A well or boring must be sealed by filling the well or boring, including an open annular space, with grout. The grout must be pumped through a tremie pipe or the casing from the bottom of the well or boring upward to within two feet of the established ground surface or floor. The bottom of the tremie pipe must remain submerged in grout while grouting. Subp. 2. Removal of obstruction; debris. Materials, debris, and obstructions that may interfere with sealing must be removed from the well or boring. Subp. 3. A. B. c. casing. casing with an open annular space must be: grouted in place; removed; or perforated or ripped. casing must be either: 55 (1) perforated a minimum of one-half square inch of open area in each footing of casing; or (2) ripped a minimum of five feet for every 20 feet of casing. Casing must be perforated or ripped through the entire length of a confining layer. If casing is to be removed from a collapsing formation, grout must be inserted so the bottom of the casing remains submerged in grout. ~ subp. 4. Additional sealing requirements for well or boring in unconsolidated materials. The additional requirements in items A and B apply to the sealing of a well or boring in unconsolidated materials. - :> A. The portion of a well of boring in unconsolidated material must be filled with bentonite grout, high solids bentonite grout, or neat cement grout. concrete. grout is approved for grouting only in the dry portion of the hole. The grout must be pumped through a tremie pipe or the casing from the bottom of the well or bOring. upward to within two feet of the established ground surface. Clean sand or cuttings equal to the volume of grout may be poured into the well or boring while the grout is pumped through a tremie pipe. The sand or cuttings must be poured at a rate which prevents bridging. B. In addition to the requirements in item A, a dug well 16 inches or greater in diameter, less than 200 feet in depth, and containing less than 20 feet of water may be sealed by pouring at a rate sufficient to completely fill the well without bridging using: (1) uniformly mixed dry bentonite powder or granular bentonite and sand in a ratio of one part bentonite to five parts sand; (2) clean unconsolidated materials with a permeability of 10~ centimeters per second or less; or (3) concrete grout. . Sealing materials must have bearing strength sufficient to prevent subsidence and support traffic or building loads. -:i- Subp. 5. Additional sealing requirements for well or boring in rock. The requirements in items A to C apply to the sealing of a well or boring in rock. ~ A. The portion of a well or boring in rock must be sealed with neat cement qrout. B. The materials and methods described in item Care approved for sealing in those portions of a well or boring where the following conditions exist: (1) a cavern more than twice the diameter of the borehole; S6 . . GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 14000 - 21ST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55447 FEE SCHEDULE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION TENNIS COURTS & PICNIC SHELTER FREEMAN PARK SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PERSONNEL P-1 Services of principal Engineer P-2 Services of Senior Project Engineer P-3 Services of Project Engineer P-4 Services of Soil Engineer P-5 Services of Secretary/Draftsman P-6 Personnel Transportation charges $105.00/hour $ a5.00/hour $ 75.00/hour $ 65.00/hour $ 32.00/hour $ 0.37/mile FIELD EXPLORATION FE-1 MObilization/demobilization of drill crew and rig, and drilling and sampling operations CME 55 CME 550 CME 750 Mob/Demob $125.00/hour $135.00/hour $145.00/hour Drillinq/Samplinq $135.00/hour $145.00/hour $155.00/hour FE-2 Layout of soil borings and surface elevations, 2 man crew FE-3 MDH borehole grout $ aO.OO/hour $ 2.50/1in.ft. LABORATORY TESTING T-1 Moisture Content Test T-2 Unit Dry Density Test T-3 Atterberg Limits Test T-4 Hand Penetrometer Test or Torvane Test T-5 Organic Content Test T-6 Unconfined Compressive Strength Test T-7 Grain Size Analysis, Washed Sieve Analysis $ a.OO/test $ a.oo/test $ 50.00/test $ a.oo/test $ 35.00/test $ 15.00/test $ 45.00/test NOTES 1. The unit prices and estimates of charges in this proposal will be effective through July 1, 1994. Beyond this date they will be -subject to review and revision. 2. The unit prices for additional services not listed above will be supplied upon request. 3. Services requested on Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays will be billed at 1.5 times the unit rates given above. 4. In the event of injuries to GME personnel because of hazardous or environmental conditions on the site, the applicable unit rates will be charged during all first aid and evacuation. ....,. .. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING I. Scope of Work GME Consultants, Inc. (hereinafter called GME) shall perform the services defined in this contract, and shall invoice the client for those services at the rates shown on the attached FEE SCHEDULE. Any estimate of cost to the Client as stated in this contract shall not be considered as a firm figure, but only as an estimate, unless otherwise specifically stated in the contract. GME will provide additional services under this contract, as required to complete the engineer- ing assignment, and/or as authorized by the Client ar.d requested by the Client with charges for those additional services at the stated rates. II. Soil Boring Locations and Elevations It is desirable for GME to use its expertise in determining the number, depth, and locations of borings. However, it is understood that the Client may specify the number, location, or depth of borings. GME agrees to follow the Client's specifications to the extent practical. If the Client specifies the number, depth or locations of borings, Client agrees to accept the risk associated therewith, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless GME from the claims of others arising therefrom. To the extent that the Client does not specify the number, locations or depth of borings, such will be selected by GME personnel. GME will determine the ground surface elevations at the boring locations. If a bench mark is not available on the site, the elevations may be estimated from the topographic map (if one is provided). In using survey data provided by the Owner (for horizontal and vertical control), GME assumes no liability or responsibility to verify the accuracy of the survey data; we assume the survey data and/or bench mark elevations are correct as given. When GME uses a bench mark provided by the local municipality, county, or the state, we likewise assume no liability or responsibility in verifying the correctness of the elevation. Since GME Consultants does not practice in the profession of land surveying, boring locations will be located in the field within the accuracy feasible. When the property lines are not surveyed and staked it may be necessary to approximately locate the borings by reference to available landmarks and landforms. In some cases, GME will request the Owner to either survey the boring locations before drilling starts, or after the completion of drilling. Such surveying will be carried out at no cost to GME. The boring locations shown on the Soil Boring Location Diagram are to be construed as approximate locations only. III. Access to Site Unless otherwise agreed, the Client will furnish GME with right-of-access to the site in order to conduct the planned exploration or field service. GME will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage due to its operations. GME has not included in the estimated charges the cost of restoration of any damage resulting from the operations, and will not be liable for such damage. If the Client directs, GME will restore the site and add the cost of restoration to the charges in accordance with personnel and equipment rates indicated on the FEE SCHEDULE. IV. Utilities In the prosecution of the work, we will take reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to subterranean structures or utilities. The client agrees to hold us harmless for any damages to subterranean structures which are not called to our attention and correctly shown or described on the documents furnished. V. Discovery of Unconfirmed Pollution, Notification to the State If we observe a substance at the ground surface, in a boring or an excavation, or if we observe a substance in contact with or within the groundwater, which in our professional opinion could potentially pollute surface waters or the ground- water, there is a legal obligation to notify the State of Minnesota Pollution Contror Agency, in accordance with the provisions of Statute 115.061, "DUTY TO NOTIFY AND AVOID WATER POLLUTION." It is our understanding that this notification must be "immediate," usually interpreted by the Agency to be within 24 hours. We will attempt to notify you, our Client, first to have you do the notification, but if you do not assure us that you will do so, or if we are unable to communicate with you, we will then be obligated to notify the State directly. The requirements of this statute supersede the usual practice of client confidentiality, and Client agrees to hold GME harmless from any consequences arising from such notification. VI. Invoices a. Invoices will be submitted once a month for services performed during the prior month. Payment is due upon presentation and is past due after thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice, unless specifically arranged otherwise in writing. The Client shall provide GME with a clear written statement within fifteen (15) days after the invoice date of any questio"ns with respect to the invoice. Failure to provide GME with a clear written statement within fifteen (15) days shall constitute acceptance of an invoice as submitted. The Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1'12%) per month eighteen percent (18%) annually on past due accounts but not to exceed the maximum rate by law. The billing rates as described in the Agreement will be increased on the anniversary of the effective date of this agreement. b. The Client's obligation to pay for the work contracted is in no way dependent upon the Client's ability to obtain financing, zoning, approval of governmental or regulatory agencies, final adjudication of a lawsuit in which GME is not involved, or upon the Client's successful completion of the project. It is agreed that ::>11 expenses incurred by GME in Iiening or collecting a delinquent amount, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, financial charges, witness personnel, document duplication, organization and storage costs, court costs, travel and sub- sistence, shall be paid to GME by the Client in addition to the delinquent amount. VII. Ownership of Documents GME will furnish three (3) copies of each report to the Client. The Client will be billed for additional copies at the rate of $25.00 per copy. All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by GME, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of GME. Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose whatsoever. .. . GME will retain all pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years follOWing submiSSion of the report, during which period the records will be made available to the Client at reasonable times. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. .. ~ . ...... VIII. Resolution of Disputes All claims, disputes and other matters in controversy arising out of or in any way r~lated to this agreement will be submitted to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law. If and to the extent we have agreed on methods for resolving such disputes, then such methods will be set forth in the "Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement" which, if attached, is incorporated into and made a part of this agree- ment. If no specific ADR procedures are set forth in the agreement, then it shall be understood that the parties shall submit disputes to mediation as a condition precedent to litigation. If a dispute at law arises from matters related to the services provided under this agreement and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as provided above, then: 1) the claim will be brought and tried in the judicial jurisdiction of the court where our principal place of business is located and the client waives the right to remove the action to any other judicial jurisdiction, and 2) the prevailing party will be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorney's fees, and other claim-related expenses. IX. Termination This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination, we shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all reports contem- plated by this agreement, we may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete our files and may also complete a report on the services performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expenses of termination or suspension shall include all our direct costs in completing such analyses, records and reports. X. Assigns Neither the client nor our firm may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer its duties or interest in this agreement without the written consent of the other party. If the client requests GME to readdress the report to another party or parties, there will be a charge of $2,000.00 plus copying costs for each party to whom the report is readdressed. GME is protected by Workers' Compensation Insurance (and/or employer's liability insurance) and by public liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage, and will furnish certificates of insurance upon request. If the Client requests increased insurance coverage, GME will take out additional insurance, if obtainable, at the Client's expense, but shall have no liability beyond the limits and conditions of the insurance coverage. XI. Limitation of Liability The Client recognizes the inherent risks connected with construction and the potential for variations in subsurface conditions. In performing its professional services, GME will use not less than that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by members of its profession practicing in the same or similar locality. No other warranty, express or implied, is made or intended by the proposal for consulting services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the finding made, and this statement may not be modified except in writing by authorized signature. In the event that GME would be held liable for damage due to professional negligence, such liability will be limited to an amount not to exceed $20,000 or the fee, whichever is greater. In the event that Client does not wish to limit GME's professional liability, GME agrees to waive this limitation upon written notice from the-Client received within five (5) days after the date this agreement is fully executed, and the Client agrees to pay an additional consideration equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the total fee, said consideration to be called "Waiver of Limitation of Professional Liability Charge." This charge will in no way be construed as being a charge for insurance of any type but will be increased consideration for greater risk involved in performing work for which there is no limitation of liability. Further, Client agrees to notify any contractor or subcontractor who may perform work in connection with any design, report or study prepared by GME of such limitation of professional liability, and to require as a condition to their performing their work, a like indemnity or limitation on their part as against GME. In the event the Client fails to obtain a like limitation of liability, client agrees to indemnify GME for any excess liability to any third person. Under no circumstances shall GME be liable for extra costs or other consequences due to "changed conditions" or for costs related to the failure of others to install materials or perform work in accordance with the plans and specifications. XII. Hazardous Waste Indemnification For services involving or relating to hazardous waste elements of this Agreement, it is agreed that the Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless GME Consultants, Inc. and its agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, direct and indirect, or consequential damages, including but not limited to fees and charges of attorneys and court and arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by GME, or claims against GME arising from the work of others, related to hazardous waste. The above indemnification provision extends to claims against GME consultants, Inc. which arise out of, are related to, or are based upon, the dispersal, discharge, escape, release or saturation of smoke, vapors, :~ot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids, gases or any other material, irritant, contaminant or pOllutant in or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upon, in or into the surface or surfaces (a) soil, (b) water or watercourses, (c) objects, or (d) any tangible or intangible matter, whether sudden or not. XIII. Lien Rights GME hereby gives notice that it retains the right to submit a lien against the subject property in the event of non- payment of invoices. The lien will be prepared and filed in accordance with pertinent laws of the state. XlV. GME Consultants, Inc. is an equal opportunity employer. Xv. Tax on Services The amount of any excise, VAT, or gross receipts tax (local, state or federal) that may be imposed, shall be additional com- pensation to the actual billings for service, and the client agrees that he shall pay the full amount of billings plus the tax. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. . . TO: Mayor & City Council \ ~ Teri Naab, Deputy Clerk \ May 5, 1994 FROM: DATE: RE: Technology Update Mr. Dave Hartley has prepared a strategy which best implements technology and current human resources. Unfortunately, most of our current equipment cannot function in the capacity needed to fully automate the office making the system more efficient, such as networking or implementation of a property data system. Dave has prepared a three year plan whereby the necessary hardware and software would be purchased, incorporating a property data system, desk top publishing, and office automation. After the final phase of the strategy, each terminal would be included on a network so information could easily be shared and efforts need not be duplicated. The first phase will provide the tools to begin implementing a property data system. The second phase will tie all new terminals together through a network and add two new terminals. The final phase would be the purchase of any remaining terminals needed, plus a scanner. The three year plan describes each component of the system and outlines the timeframe for purchase. It is our recommendation to use the 1993 money budgeted for a property data system and desk top publishing to implement the first phase of the plan. Funds for the second phase implementation could be taken from contingency. Funds would be budgeted in 1995 for the completion of the system. We must also keep in mind that money should be budgeted each year to ensure the equipment and human resources remain up to date thereby reducing the possibility of a need for overall system changes in the future. ~5 City of Shorewood, Minnesota QQJ.I1J1 ltmn Summary of Equipment and Software neeJ9d to create a Local f..rea Network. Price . . 1993 Power PC 6100/60 This will likely be placed in planning. Power PC 6100/60 w/windows This computer has more memory and DOS & Windows software for computability until more PPCs are installed 2 Color Display 14" Monitors are purchased separately. this is a standard size. 2 Extended Keyboard Keyboards are purchased separately. the "extended keyboard is the standard model for office settings. 2 Ethernet Transceiver This device connects the computer to other computers using a type of cabling that looks like telephone \vire. 2 Personal Information Manager Specific software can be selected later based on preferences but if you are going to use technology to improve upon your skills of organization. you should use these toois. 2 Claris FileMaker Pro This software is the program that runs a database for property records and other database applications. Microsoft Office Documentation Only one copy of the documentation is being purchased as reference material. If you tind that more sets of documentation are needed you can purchase them separately at a later time. Microsoft Office Ucense Only Once the software is purchased you will need to purchase licenses for each additional user. Microsoft Office This is a .. suite" of software packages that includes a full featured word processor. spreadsheet. presentations developer. and a license to use e-mail. LaserWriter wtTwisted Pair Ethemet Printer capable of producing ne\vsletter quality prints at 8 pages per minute. LaserWriter Pro Envelope Feeder Added capabilities for printer. LaserWriter Pro 500 Sheet Paper Tray Added capabilities for printer. 42 Strategy Review Prepare analysis of the Shore wood informa cion system and make recommendations for future use of technology. Total 81.647.00 82.266.00 8582.00 8326.00 8162.00 8206.00 8556.00 887.00 8332.00 8366.00 82.119.00 $317.00 8317.00 82.730.00 512,013.00 Phase 1 Tax 5548.12 QQy1Jt ~ 2 1994 Power PC 6100/60 A slandard workslation 3 Color Display 14" l\'Jonilors are purchased separately. this is a standard size. 2 Extended Keyboard Keyboards are purchased separately. the "extended keyboard is the slandard model for office settings. 1 Keyboard Keyboards are purchased separately, this keyboard COSIS less than the extended keyboard and \\1ll be used on the server since extensiw data entry is not needed on the sen'er. 3 Ethernet Transceiver This device connects the computer to other computers using a type of cabling that looks like lelephone wire. 2 Personal Information Manager Specific software can be selected later based on preferences but if you are going to use technology to improve upon your skills of organization. you should use these tools. . Aldus PageMaker v.5.0 Desh."top Publishing software 2 Claris FileMaker Pro This soflware is the program that runs a database for prop,my records and other database applications. 2 Microsoft Office Ucense Only Once the software is purchased you will need to purchase licenses for each additional user. 1 12 PORT 10Base-T hub A component of the network that connects several individual workstations to the tile serv er. UPS 600VA Battery power system for server. 1 Network Cable Installation . This includes installation of cable to locations which \\1lllikely be locations of nem:orked workstations. Work Group Server 80 This is the computer that will function as the file server, all software for the network is included in the price along with a tape drive for backups. If you want the ftIe sen'er to handle print jobs from the UNIX system you should consider the model 95 which cost approx $9,000.00 Shared FAX/Modem This modem \\ill make it possible to send faxes from any worksta lion 150 Professional Services Create database and converter for Hennepin County data on propeny for use \\1th newly created property database. Train staff in the use of database. 60 Professional Services Assist \\1th installation of network and software. Provide training and advice regarding \\1se use of networked computers. Install Network 1.285.00, Install Software 730.00, Training two days 1.040.00 Total ~ 83.294.00 8873.00 8326.00 885.00 8243.00 8204.00 8579.00 8556.00 8664.00 8755.00 8390.00 8900.00 ~5,352.00 8632.00 89,750.00 82,820.00 S27,423.00 Phase 2 Tax S760.45 ~ lliml EJ:kg 1995 Phase 3 Power PC 8100/80 33.S64.00 This computer has greater capabilities and will be belter suited for desktop publishing and manipulati.~g graphics. Color Display 16" 5928.00 This display can be used in conjunction with the desktop publishing acti\.ities. It is very difficult to assemble documents for desktop publishing on the smaller 1.+" screens. 4 Personal Information Manager S408.00 Specific software can be selected later based on preferences but if you are going to use technology to improve upon your skills of organization. you should use these tools. Microsoft Mail Server 8271 .00 Once the software is purchased you ~il1 need to purchase licenses for each additional user. 4 Ethernet Transceiver 8324.00 This device connects the computer to other computers using a type of cabling that looks like telephone \\1re. 4 Arc View S2.040.00 This software is used to view the property database as a map and perform . analysis using the graphic representation of the data as maps. (e.g.. you can draw a circle 500 feet from a certain property and generate mailing labels for the selected properties.) Note: the use of this product assumes that you have the data to display. currently several organizations are generating maps and data using ArcInfo. The City of Shorewood could contract _\ith either neighboring communities. the county. or the state for these maps. 3 Power PC 6100/60 54.941.00 .4. standard workstation 3 Color Display 14" 3873.00 Monitors are purchased separately. this is a standard size. , NetModem IE 1.5 51.498.00 This modem will permit users from remote locations to have access to the entire network via telephone lines. 4 Extended Keyboard 5652.00 Keyboards are purchased separately. the "extended keyboard is the standard . model for office settings. 4 Claris FileMaker Pro 51 . 1 12.00 This software is the program that runs a database for property records and other database applications. 7 Additional Memory for PPC's 52.457.00 Added memory makes it possiable to do more tasks at once. Omni Page by Caere 5502.95 This software in conjunction with a scanner will permit documents to be scanned and the images converted into text used by \\;ord processors. The time savings from not having to retype older documents is tremendous. , TCP/Connect S382.00 This software ~ill make it possiable to connect to the UK IX computer either over the network or through a serial port. To connect over the network an ethernet card must be installed in the U:--JL\: computer. HP ScanJet IIcx 51.068.00 In addition to scanning documents. photographs can be scanned for inclusion in newslelters and flyers. 4 Microsoft Office Ucense Only 51,328.00 Once the software is purchased you will need to purchase licenses for each additional user. Total 522.748.95 Tax 5804.00 MAY 05 '94 09:29 OSM MPLS, MN P.l QS'4i=~. May 4, l~ . 300 ParI<: Place center 5775 wayzata Boulevard Mirmeapolis. MN 55416-1228 612-595-5775 1-800-753-5775 FAX. 595-5774 Honorable Mayor and City Council . City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood,:MN 55331 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors . Re: Old Market Road Trail City Project 94-2 OSM .File 5218.05 .. Dear May.or and Council Members: . On April 26, 1994. a public information meeting was held to discuss the proposed plans for constructing a concrete sidewalk along the east side of Old Market Road. Unfortunately, only one resident from the area attended this meeting, but she did bave favorable comments on the project as a whole. After the information meeting, the park board held their regular meeting at which time they passed a favorable recommendation on to the Council The plans have received preliminary approval for State Aid Funding, with some minor revisions required for their final. approval. The full set of constrnction plans are at City Hall for your inspection. In addition, a large scale, color version of the major construction items, along with addresses, is in the Council chambers. Please call me at 595-5695 with any questions. Sincerely, ORR~HElEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIAlES Joel A. Dresel, P.E., LS. City Engineer *0 Jt\CML\ml\I:lNOINml.\JAI)\Ul'rI'EBS\0506l4.oWR Equal Oppottlll1ity J:mployer . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1201 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1: Section 1201.03 Subd. 5.d.(8) of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to include: "(P) Surfacing, curbing and striping required by paragraphs (k):, (1) and (n) above may be waived or delayed for parking lots in City parks, provided that drainage, traffic, dust control, parking demand, vehicular control and proximity to residential development are taken into consideration, and provided that the improvements are incorporated into the City's Capital Improvements Program and reviewed by the City Council annually. " Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this 9th day of May, 1994. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk ~7 ~ . .. .'-- R 6 .'f"n' AD - .!,,_,/l I l. -..;v--": &~ tfj kfIYvJt'lvv! ~a~li / ! DC;0t~, - . - ,- ---, ,. - - c; .~.~.:. ~~.~...s- 00~.~. _~.~.' '. . ~.' .~.. cL~d#. ; . ::;b~~j W~. ~'i . ~~; . ..;.. ! ~.J. ~9I--.u~. ~. ~-/ : U;a~~. : ..... ..... ..e.- . i~~~t:;;l~h~St~ 1 (!:..tU1t ~ .tV ~ eve ~. d . .' i~~~~~/~ ...../Jt!/~~~~ . ._;(~ ~'-'. .~.'. ... .~ ~-tu ---~------- -- ~-~- --------------~--~~-- ------ -------- . . TO: Mayor & City Council Teri Naab, Deputy Clerk FROM: DATE: May 4, 1994 RE: Chaska Road Speed Study In response to a letter received from Kim Richards, 6085 Chaska Road, SLMPSD placed the SMART unit on Chaska Road to monitor speeds and number of cars. Per the Chief's memorandum, there appears to be somewhat of a traffic problem in the area. He suggests that this may be an area for the traff ic enforcement specialist to concentrate on once hired. In addition, during his research the Chief found that the actual legal speed limit for Chaska Road is 35 MPH opposed to the posted 30 MPH, and in order for the Council to reduce this speed by resolution, the area must be considered urban (i.e. units less than 100' apart for a distance of a quarter mile or more). If this area cannot be considered urban, and the Chief is not certain that it can be, a speed study could be requested to review the situation. He cited several reasons for the speed to be reduced to 30 MPH. If a speed study is requested, Chief Young also suggested that a study be completed for smithtown Road where it is posted 30 MPH but is actually 40 MPH. 5494.1 -tP r f3 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA TEL NO.612-474-4477 . . Apr 29.94 11:17 No.OOl P.02 SOUTH LAKE MlNNETONKA PUBUC SAFElY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG Chief of Police (612) 474-3261 ;ME;MQBAN~U;M To: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Richard A~ YoU~~ 29, 1994 (j Prom: Chief Date: April Subject: Chaska Road Speed Study Attached is the SMART trailer printout which covers three workday travel periods. The speeds average lower than the weekend and are more grouped around the work rush hours. Interestingly, there are a lot more vehicles using Chaska Road during the evening rush hours than the morning rush hours. One could assume that in the morning hours Highway 41 traffic does not really gain anything by cutting through on Chaska Road to Highway 7. They have a free right turn onto Highway 7 from Highway 41. However, in the evening, the same traffic going home has to stop for the stop light before turning left onto Highway 41. They can avoid the stop light by cutting through on Chaska Road and take their chances at the stop sign on Highway 41. As I mentioned in my previous memorandum about this road, the only way to avoid this would be to make a change at Highway 7, such as eliminating the crossover. Due to the many cloudy days not allowing the solar unit to charge the battery system and the forecast for snow (which did come), I removed the unit from Chaska Road on Thursday, April 28th. Once the unit is recharged I can place it back there if you think we need more data. Please let me know. The speeds recorded do show th.~re is somewhat of a problem on this street. All I can do is what has already been done and that is to ask the officers to patrol the area as their time allows. It is certainly one of the areas the part time traffic enforcement specialist will work once that position is filled. Only 4% of the weekend studied vehicles and 3% of the weekday studied vehicles were exceeding the speed limit sufficiently to be issued citations. That is correct only when the speed limit is enforced at the posted 30 MPH. Unfortunately, the legal speed limit is 35 MPH and has never been reduced to the posted limit by official action. After our staff meeting where it was determined that a city council can, by resolution, reduce speed limits to statutory limits, I looked further at that provision and at the actual location. In order to reduce the limit without a state study and authorization, the area must meet the definition of urban district. This requires "business, industry, or dwelling houses situated at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of a quarter mile or more". In viewing the area, I do not know if it Sming Sorah Lake Minnewnka C071lII'IU1liJie of frcelsior, Greenwood, Slwrewood and Tonka Bay SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA TEL NO.6l2-474-4477 Apr 29,94 11:17 No.OOl P.03 meets this definition. 100 feet is a very small distance between homes, particularly in a suburb. This area also has a lot of unbuildable land which increases distances between homes. Before the council passes a resolution, someone should verify that the area can legally meet the definition or the resolution is really null and void. If that is the case, I would recommend a request for a speed study. Factors in favor of a speed study confirming the need to reduce the speed limit to 30 MPH include the curves in the road, narrowness of the road, streets intersecting at other than right angles, reduced visibility, and the fact that Chanhassens portion of the road is 30 MPH. This assumes their road is legally posted. However, they do have higher land with houses much closer together and would probably meet the definition of urban district. If the council is going to ask for that speed study, I would also recommend they do the same thing with Smithtown Road. It is posted 30 MPH for its entire length. However, it is actually 40 MPH from . Cathcart west to the city limits. The same provision of Minnesota Statute 169.14 Subd. 5b., could be applied except for the same reasons mentioned for Chaska Road. There is a lot of unbuildable land and what houses are along the road are spaced quite a distance apart due to large lot sizes. However, the portions east of Cathcart and that in Chanhassen are 30 MPH. A strong argument not to have varying speed limits along a short distance of the same street should be enough to have them agree to legally reducing the speed limit to 30 MPH. . SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFElY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A YOUNG Chief of Police (612) 474-3261 MEBQBABnUM J\PR 2 To: James c. Hurm, City Admini,trator Chief Richard A. Youn~/ April 11, 1994 () From: Date: Subject: Request for Input - Chaska Road area . Obviously, this problem is not unique to these particular streets. Many of the answers to this complaint are the "standard" ones: Speed limits are really set by the State of Minnesota. The Ci ty of Shorewood can only request a study which may result in an authorization to change the speed limit. More speed limit signs could be installed by the City of Shorewood, but its sign budget is limited. More patrol by the police department is certainly a possibility, but is also limited by the amount of resources we have available. I am sure the real problem times in this area are the same "going to/ from work" hours as are all of the rest of the problem locations. . Speed bumps are not an appropriate response due to snowplowing and liability concerns. They also can be used to "pop" tires off of, thereby causing a squealing of tires. They also are really easier to take at higher speeds than moderate speeds. The closing of any intersection necessarily moves traffic to another location. This is the same resul t we are seeing on Excelsior Boulevard. Until or unless the Chaska Road intersection with Highway 7 is closed, this problem will continue and probably increase to some extent. As you know, the police department does not normally issue citations to persons exceeding the speed limit by only a few miles per hour. As we have explained in the past, this is really set by the judges who do not want to be bothered with violations below a certain level. Therefore, the complainant is correct in the statement that the speed limit is stretched to 40 MPH. The real solution to this problem is to close the Highway 7 intersection. However, that is not within the authority of the City of Shorewood. I do think the State of Minnesota would be receptive to that idea, although some business owners and others may not. Serving South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay ~~B We will try to increase patrol in the area. This is just one more area that a traffic enforcement specialist could spend some time. I am currently preparing to hire someone for that position, once I am given the official authorization at this weeks Coordinating Committee meeting. I will notify all of our officers of this complaint and try to get them in the area more often. Now that the possibility of snowfalls have been reduced significantly, I have started to prepare the SMART radar trailer for use. This will be a good place to use the system. I would hope to place it in the area yet this week. This is a duty the traffic enforcement specialist will take over and therefore result in frequent, if not constant, use of this system in trouble or study areas. I would like to remind you that this trailer is very expensive. I mentioned to you originally to make sure the system is listed on your insurance policy and am assuming this has been accomplished. We have also received several complaints of speeding on another . street in this same area. A resident on Murray Street has made several complaints and threatened to write letters to the city, etc. We have worked the area several times in response to those complaints (the most recent being yesterday) but have not found any violations sufficient to issue a citation. . *** TRAFFIC SUMMARY Pg 1 *** START:FRI 04/22/94 14:01 END:1'lON 04/25/94 12:38 HR 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ;) ,., i. .j 4 J 6 7 ~ ,., 7 10 ~ 1 u o o o o r) o o 19 0 ;~ ~ .., .:.~ l~ ," 'w 16 ,i .i! 18 22 0 23 0 Cars ~. . .1Ie Hj;' v ~ ., .J 4 .J ;. ~ 3 ,., j 10 2 11 12 .., ~,j .. :, 15 16 17 18 19 ::) -, .... 23 0 C:rs i.ile o o I) o o o o o o o o o I) I) ~,. i.1 I, V I) o i\ IJ o o " i. 2 ., ,) .J 4 o 1 1 1 o 27 6 o o I) o o o o I) o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o I) o o 22 23 o I) I. 'i u I' v o .:, I 'I ~ .:\ 1 4 5 < " . 'I 4 4 3 " i. < " < " ., oJ o 1 o :,0 11 I) o o o ., oJ I) o o o o o I) o o o o 3 o o o I) I) o o 6 i) I. IJ I) I) Q (I 2 2 6 ., .j 11 " i. 2 ~ .J 4 ., I 2 4 5 6 ., .j 2 1 o 66 12 o o I) o o o o o I) I) o o o I) o o o o o I) 2 o 1) o ,., i. I) 24 o I) o v I) 1 3 8 " 2 5 2 4 4 8 3 a 9 3 '; i. o 74 i5 o I) o o 6 o o o I) I) o 2 o o o I) o o o o o o o 9 o 25 o i' oj () o o ., ,\ ,., 1 10 . 'I 8 5 7 4 2 I o 6 4 7 4 4 4 . L '; /. ,"';4 71 20 o o o o o 1 o o I) o o 1 I) o o 1 I) o o o o o o I) 3 9 o 1 26 27 u o I) o o I) 1 4 ., I " ..; 10 9 10 o ., .! 12 5 10 5 9 4 " J I) 100 ,"" i., I) o o o o o o o o 5 o 1 1 o 1 o o o o o 1 o o o " i. o I) o o ., .j 4 10 6 10 12 3 7 11 13 10 11 10 4 4 5 5 132 136 159 31 37 45 13 o o o o o I) I) I) o o o 3 I) o o o ^ IJ 1 I) 3 o o I) o 7 28 1 o o o o I) I) ~ 5 11 9 5 4 5 14 9 17 12 12 9 b ., .j 4 " ..; 14 I) o o o I) 1 o 1 o o o o I) o 1 I) I) o 4 2 1 o o o 10 2 29 3 o o o o I) 1 4 .., 1,) 7 9 7 11 7 7 18 14 16 6 7 19 5 < " " i. 15 I) o o o o o o o 1 o o o o 1 o o o o 1 o ^ Ii o I) o 3 " i. 30 o I) ., ,I o o o o 6 11 7 I 'I a 12 10 9 14 13 13 16 13 5 3 4 . 'I 155 171 52 60 16 o o o o o I) o o 2 o 1 2 o o 1 " i. I) I) o I) o o o o 8 2 31 1 1 o I) 1 1 o 4 11 a 13 13 13 4 11 12 17 12 17 15 7 b 4 I) 17 o I) o o o o 2 o 1 1 1 o 2 o o 3 1 2 I) I) 1 1 o o 15 16 3 4 32 33 " i. I) o ij (; o I) 5 11 " i. 7 9 16 6 9 12 13 19 14 16 3 4 5 4 157 147 112 68 75 80 18 I) o o o o o o o 2 1 1 o 1 o 1 1 2 2 3 o 1 I) I) 3 1) I) o I) o 1 4 6 .5 9 9 14 4 12 ." 1"; .. u 22 10 7 ., oJ 7 ., oj 19 20 o I) o o o o o 2 o o 1 o o (I 1 o 1 3 o 1 1 o 1 I) o o o 1 o o o o I) o 1 1 2 1 1 1 o o 5 1 3 o o o .. u 17 4 " ..; 34 "'" .j.J 1) 1 I) I) o o 1 I) I) (I o (I 3 o o 5 5 4 3 7 3 3 11 10 a 9 10 12 12 10 5 " .J 3 5 10 a 10 9 B 4 2 " i. ., .J 1 I) 3 3 87 S4 *** TRAFFIC SUMMARY Pg 2 *** START:FRI 04/22/9414:01 END:1'lIJf 04/25/94 12:38 ~ 3b 37 .38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4S 46 47 48 49 50 I) 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .J 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .! 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 I) I) 0 0 0 0 0 ., 4 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 a 1 " 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,; 9 S " 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,; 10 10 6 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 5 2 7 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5 4 ., 5 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .J .., 4 6 3 " 5 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ,.J .. 14 3 5 2 4 1 2 1 0 1 0 I) 0 0 0 0 15 7 7 6 4 3 I) 1 I) 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 ,; 16 2 '1 B 6 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 .. 17 7 13 6 5 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 I) 18 6 5 4 1 2 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 I) . 19 2 2 .., 0 1 0 1 0 0 I) 0 I) I) I) I) ,; 20 1 c: 1 1 1 0 (I 0 I) 0 1 0 0 I) 0 ... -'1 . 0 0 ., 0 I) 1 0 I) () I) 0 I) I) ..4 ! oJ .-..-. 3 0 2 1 I) I) . 1 ., 0 1 0 I) 0 :..i. ! .J '1, ., 0 I) 0 0 1 I) I) 0 I) 0 I) 0 I) 4..' oJ Cars 70 70 47 "... '1C: 16 14 10 7 6 7 2 I) 0 ,JiJ ..... 7.ile 87 91 93 95 'i6 97 9S 9B 99 99 99 99 99 99 ~'9 H.R 51 52 53 54 = "I "., sa 59 6r' 61 62 63 64 6S ,j-.! .00 .!I ..' 0 I) I) I) 0 I) I) I) I) I) 0 I) I) I) I) I) I) " 0 I) I) I) I) 0 I) I) 1 I) 1) 0 I) '.' '1 I) I) I) 0 0 I) I) 0 0 I) I) I) 0 0 I) .. ., 0 0 0 0 . I) 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 I) I) 0 .J 4 I) I) I) I) I) 0 I) 0 0 0 I) 0 I) 0 0 . " 0 0 I) I) 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 I) 0 I) .J 6 0 (} I) I) ..0 0 0 I) r. 0 0 0 .0 I) I) v 7 I) I) 0 I) 0 I) 0 0 0 I) I) 0 0 0 I) .~ I) I) I) I) I) I) I) 0 0 I) 0 0 I) I) I) ::; 9 0 0 0 I) 0 I) I) 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 I) 10 0 I) I) I) I) I) 0 I) I) I) I) I) 0 I) 0 11 I) 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 I) 0 12 I) 0 I) I) 0 0 I) I) 0 0 0 I) 0 I) I) 13 0 0 0 I) 0 0 l) l) 0 I) 0 I) I) I) I) .. I) I) I) I) 0 I) I) 0 I) I) 0 0 0 I) I) l~ ." 0 0 {) I) I) I) I) I) 0 0 I) 0 I) I) 0 l.J 16 I) I) 0 I) I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 I) 0 .., 0 0 I) 0 0 1 I) I) I) 0 I) I) I) I) 0 .1 18 I) I) 0 0 0 0 I) I) I) 0 0 I) 0 (I 0 19 I) I) I) I) I) I) I) I) I) 0 I) 1) I) I) I) 21) 0 0 I) I) I) 1 I) I) 0 0 I) 0 0 0 I) 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 () () 0 0 0 I) !) I) () .,.., I) 1) 0 0 0 I) I) ... I) I) I) I) 0 0 0 ~~ '-' ..) ij 0 I) I) I) Q I) I) 0 0 l) 0 0 0 I) Cars 0 I) I) \) I) , I) I) 0 () 1 l) 0 0 I) .. ., . ~ 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 lCK) I. lie SOUTH LRKE MINNETONKR TEL NO.612-474-4477 Rpr 29,94 11 : 17 No.OOl P.04 :J** TRAFFIC SUMMARY Pg 1 *** START:~ 04/25/94 13:53 END:THU 04/26/94 09:59 Ho' 6 1 a 9 10 11 12 ... g ,.. 16 17 IB 19 20 1..1 .oJ .' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (I (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (l (I 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .: 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 0 1 1 (I 0 0 7 0 1 0 (l 0 0 1 0 (I 1 0 1 0 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 4 1 ., 0 (I 0 (l 1 0 0 1 0 0 (J 1 2 1 1 ". 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 ~ '-' d 0 0 0 (1 1 0 1 0 0 1 (l 1 (I 1 0 .~ (I 0 0 (I 0 0 0 . , 0 1 1 I 3 1 0 , .. ~3 (! 0 0 0 (J 0 1 0 0 0 (I 1 (I 0 ~ :4 0 0 0 (I 4 0 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 3 3 .~ 0 0 1 (I 1 2 (I (I 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 ...1 :6 0 (I 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 ., 1 3 .. ... (1 (I 0 0 0 0 0 (l 0 (l 1 0 0 1 2 .' :s .~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 5 , :9 0 1 (I 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 (I 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 (I 0 0 0 j 0 1 0 0 (I (l 0 (I 0 0 0 2 0 (I (l 0 (I 0 (I 1 0 (I (I 0 0 0 0 (I 0 1 0 (I 0 0 f, f, 0 (1 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 (l v v 7 " 11 15 M :1'; 0 1 3 ~ 11 11 11 5 6 11 .e ii .;;? (i 0 0 0 (l 1 2 2 2 oj .. 4 4 5 6 .,j '!l 32 33 34 n " 21 22 'J'l .., 25 " 27 2S 29 3(; ojoJ .oJ itr ~e .'. (J 1 0 .0 1 0 (I 0 1 (i (I 0 0 0 (l 0 0 0 (I (I (I 0 (I (I (I C 0 (I (I (l (I (I 0 (I (I (I 0 (I (I (I 0 0 (; (I (I 0 (I 0 0 (I (I (I 0 (I 0 (I 0 (I (I (I . 0 0 0 (I 1 (I (I (I (I (I (I 0 (I (I 0 1 (I 1 (I (I 1 (I 2 1 0 (I (I 1 1 (I 5 (I B 7 3 5 a 5 4 2 3 2 1 5 6 7 ,., 2 S 13 12 12 16 11 10 9 5 4 I.. 2 9 7 9 11 13 13 9 "0 3 5 b 4 5 a 1 4 4 5 6 13 8 6 7 7 5 " 9 2 2 ~ 2 4 2 2 " 4 4 5 5 3 5 1 7 3 (I J. 1 3 2 1 7 2 4 4 5 4 5 2 3 4 1 .. 4 1 2 3 3 1 5 5 .. 5 4 b 3 3 J. oJ 4 3 3 S 3 2 5 .. 7 5 2 6 4 .. 2 oJ J 4 5 7 1 7 9 13 b 7 b 5 B 5 b b 3 B 4 4 a b 13 12 15 7 S 4 9 a b 4 7 b 7 11 11 B 18 13 21 12 11 14 11 4 0 4 b 7 10 15 18 17 21 26 IB lJ 17 15 12 5 4 b 11 11 11 22 13 10 19 9 19 10 b 7 2 4 3 4 5 b 14 19 14 14 10 17 !1 12 7 ~ 2 1 0 9 11 7 b 4 14 a b 5 4 2 .J 4 1 1 1 2 3 .. 5 7 2 4 4 5 .. 3 oJ ,j (J 0 (J 0 (I 3 2 (l 1 1 ., 1 1 (I (I .. 0 (I (I 0 (I 0 (I 1 1 2 (I 1 0 (I 0 43 69 bb 77 107 125 159 147 H9 Ib2 119 1:7 122 94 69 9 12 15 19 25 31 39 4b .... 62 67 74 so S5 89 .'J -..-'_-...,' I I I L-l 11.... L- " J. ,."., l.:. I '-' 1'1 "',., It.L 1'1IJ . e'l.::::-4 ('4-4477 Apr 29,94 11:17 No.OO1 P.05 *** TRAFFIC SUMMARY Pg 2 *** STAAT:/'m 04/?5/94 13:53 END:THU 04/28/94 09:59 ;;: 36 37 ~ 39 ~ 41 42 43 44 4S 46 47 48 49 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 I) 0 I) 0 1 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 I) 0 0 " 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I) , 0 0 0 0 0 - 3 I) 0 0 I) 0 0 0 I) I) 0 I) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 J: 1 0 0 I) I) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 I) I) 0 I) 7 6 5 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 g 2 1 2 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 9 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 1 3 1 1 I) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3 0 1 I 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 I) I) 0 0 12 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 I) 0 0 I) .~ 3 0 0 1 I) 1 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 ,.. 14 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 I) 1 0 1 0 I) i5 5 3 4 1 0 I) 0 I) 0 0 0 0 I) I) I) 16 10 1 2 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 17 5 6 7 4 1 1 1 1 I) I) 0 I) 0 0 0 4,~ 7 2 5 2 2 ., 1 1 2 I) 0 I) 0 I) 0 . ,~ I- i9 6 3 4 2 2 2 0 I) 0 I) (I 0 I) 0 0 :0 6 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 I) I) 0 I) 21 0 3 2 0 1 1 I) 0 I) 1 I) I) I) I) I) ~.., 1 I) I) 1 I) 0 2 I) 0 0 0 I) (; 0 I) .... 23 I I) 0 0 0 I) I) 0 I) I) I) I) 0 0 0 C.,)~= 03 33 37 ..., 12 11 16 a 3 2 1 0 I) I) ~ . ..l.. U. , 92 q" 95 'n 97 9S 99 99 ~l.e ,oJ 99 99 99 99 11)0 100 100 51 52 53 54 55 56 17 58 59 60 61 ," 63 64 bS ~ c.: ~~ I) 0 I) 0 0 0 0 I) I) I) (i I) 0 (I I) I 0 0 0 I) I) 0 I) 0 I) I) 0 0 0 I) 0 2 0 I) 0 0 0 0 I) I) 0 0 I) I) 0 0 (I 3 0 0 0 0 0 (I 0 (I (I (I (I (I (I 0 0 4 (I 0 (I (I (I 0 (I O. (I 0 (I (I (I (I (I . ~ 0 0 (I (I (I (I (I 0 (I (I (I 0 (I (I (I b 0 0 (I (I (I (I 0 0 0 0 0 (I (I (I (I 7 0 (I (I 0 0 0 (I 0 (I 0 0 0 (I (I (I B I) (I 0 0 (I (I 0 0 0 (I (I 0 0 0 (I 9 0 (I (I 0 0 (I (I 0 (I (I 0 (I (I 0 0 10 (I 0 0 0 (I 0 0 (I 0 (I I) I) 0 ,0 0 11 (I 0 (I (I 0 (I (I (I 0" O' (I -'0 (I .. (I 0 . ' 12 (I , 0 I) 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 (I 0 (I (I (I 13 0 (I (I 0 (I 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 (I 0 0 14 I) (I 0 (I (I 0 (I 0 0 (I (I (I (I 0 (I 15 0 (I 0 I) 0 0 (I 0 (I 0 (I 0 (I 0 (I 16 (I (I 0 (I (I 0 0 (I 0 (I (I 0 0 (I 0 17 0 (I (I 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 (I 0 (I 8 8 IS 0 I) (I (I (I (I 0 (I 0 (I 0 (I (I (I 0 0 0 0 (I 0 (I (I (I (I 0 0 (I (I 20 (J (I (I (I (I (I 0 0 0 (J 0 (I (I I) (I 21 0 (I (I (I 0 (I (I (I (I (I 0 (I 0 0 0 21 0 (I (I (I (I (I (I 0 (I (I 0 (I 0 0 (I 23 (I (I 0 (I 0 (I (I (I (I (I (I Q (I (I (I ars (I (I (I (I (J (I !) I) (I 0 (I (I i) I) 0 jle 100 1(10 100 100 100 100 100 100 1(1(1 100 100 100 J(J(I 100 100 MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and Af Rolek Councilmembers a? FROM: DATE: May 5, 1994 . RE: Request to abate penalty~from Phil & Susan Johnson, 4460 Enchanted Drive Mr. & Mrs. Johnson state in their letter to the City that they have not received a bill for utility service prior to the most recent billing>period. The Johnsons have resided in their home, which was a newly constructed home, since April, 1993. They are requesting the abatement of penalties assessed to their account and a portion of their first billing. . Our records show that utilities have been billed to this property since April,1993. Mr. Johnson states in his letter that he has been billed for three months in which he did not occupy the home. This is not the case. The Johnsons were billed $7.01 in April, 1993 for 11 days service in March, 1993, from the time of final inspection of the sewer hookup. This bill would be the responsibili ty of t:he Johnsons or their builder. I, therefore, charge recommend this not be abated. We do not know the disposition of the previous bills. They were. mailed at the same time utility bills for all other properties in the City were mailed. Over the past year, totaL late penalties of $41.53 have been assessed to the Johnsons' account. . If you have any further questions relative to this matter, please call me. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~'t April 12, 1994 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Account #0-245-04460-0 Phil/Susan Johnson Gentlemen: In yesterday's mail, we received the attached bill from the City of Shorewood for what we I ve been told is a quarterly sewer assessment. Prior to purchasing this lot to build our home, we were advised that the sewers were already in and paid for. . We moved into our home in April of 1993, approximately one year ago. Not only is this the first and only bill that we have ever received from you, but we I re also being charged for 3 months (Jan-Feb-Mar) during which we did not occupy the house. Therefore, you can well imagine our immediate shock and dismay when noting that by April 30, 1994, we supposedly owe $299.46, which includes a past due balance of $216.34 (again, of which we were not aware), plus $20.94 in penalty fees for something we never received. My wife called your offices this morning to inquire as to why we have not received any prior notification, etc. There was no logical answer, other than they related possible problems with the post office, which very well could be and would also not be our first experience with same. However, we do not feel we should be penalized $20.94 for a bill/s we never received in the first place, nor for the 3 months the house was not occupied. We are not trying to shun our responsibility and, obviously, it would be much less of a burden to be paying this quarterly, however, we were not even aware that this matter existed. . While we realize that receipt of a $299.46 bill is never a welcome sight, this has also hit us at a particularly bad time. My wife has just recently been released from the hospital from maj or back surgery and will be out of work for a minimum of 3 months, which has also meant a big cut in our monthly income as well as numerous medical bills. There is also a chance that she may never be able to return to work. The bottom line here is that we would like to ask that you drop the $20.94 penalty fees, plus deduct 3 months from the bill, and allow us to make paYments to you on the remaining balance until we can get caught up on this bill. We are enclosing $40.00 toward our bill and look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Si~~ Phil & Susan Johnson 4460 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, MN 55364 '#9 FROM 12/31 o ST o SW SALES TAX .00 PENALTY 20.94 . ~-- -- -- - -- :,== -:::.:;:-..::= : Fe::; 4460 ENCHANTED DR PL.AN FOR SPRING CLEAN UP SATURDAY. MAY 21!!!!! ...., 2.63 59.55 PREVIOUS BAL. 21"':,.34 AMOUNT DU!: AFTER DUE OAT: 328.71 J I::: ?~esorted F,rst Class us POSTAGE PAiD PERMIT tJO. 128 PLEASE F"TURfJ TH,C STUB WIT... Po.YMEii- ACCOUNT NUMBER . AMOUNT DUE AFJER DUE DATE ?99.46 I 328.71 PHIL/SUSAN ,JOHNSON 4460 ENCHANTED DR MOUNt). MN 55364 . . . , /' , --- Section 7 - Financial Matters Subdivision The parties recognize that any of them may have special policing needs unique to that party. They agree that in such instances, the party believing they have such a unique need, shall bring to the Coordinating Commi ttee, a statement detailing the need and a proposal for funding the police services requested. The Coordinating Committee shall review the request. A majority vote of the Coordinating Committee shall be required to authorize any police services or funding changes for those unique police services not in conformance with this Agreement. '/PIO . . April 7, 1994 SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL Shorewood, MN 55331 Please consider this letter a formal request to'reserve time on the agenda for the next Shorewood City Council Meeting. Our request is in regards to having a sign posted on the "dead end" portion of Howards Point Road, informing the in-coming traffic of children playing in the area. Therefore asking the traffic to "drive slowly" or "caution children playing in the area". ;:' Respectfully, \;., THE "HOWARDS POINT" AREA RESIDENTS au/list of area residents ;'~1 ; r.....". :..':',-;.-_.\~y~ "\1" r '") ,. ',l- ~// "HOWARDS POINT" AREA RESIDENTS NAME ~'ff~ ft.m q.a~b ~ju..<-G icy, ,J~70 /-jLLQfI(j Pi- J;cj /,\ J. '~-I) .y1 ''\If; e-;., - . I L ]/ oJ ,/w>VJ)~ ! fW:O i (i...' ,u,~ /1- . -..) '.,4..::;' (J I ro Lo..l y~ :): t I <.. ''>J .. I . I,'''! /) )" / / '1 ,j''Z ~i;it1/l l tU'l~"id( ~;:J /1 /-i c (,"/;1 V , ADDRESS (t 10 IdNortd4 ~ )JL TELEPHONE </7'fozz-c; 47t-1-7J/~ y. 74--)C7b ea q /flI1-- ~~ j;;,./ 59- J J- .. ..../ ,1 /Xl) /J .' ,1/! /. , I.:, \ l / i I: ! \,/./ ~ i '\, /",' '. j '~- "~ f /1- / , ,/ I '--I. / "- . \! i..-J <y~, /I.'UV /lJ1!,f ,..,~) J....$ 6> (... }, ; /1 ,/';1/C/'/ ,::Y r u ! I)' II If "/!fh./YYIfY1AJ- f)~ 5d-~5 ~j1-1L/7d1 It 1\ S'37S- I i 5~/:;-~) !( o ~ 3<5 ttow~~ t:+- ~ r 1/7" !.'] / ,,) '} <..,,:. '-I. - {,..;., .v c' " I ,-,",\. . T7~-;;2 701 . LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ^.DP 9 ,~~~ April 18, 1994 TO: Lake Access Task Force and Interested Parties Task Force Chair James N. Grathwol~~ Draft Report of the 1992 Lake Minnetonka Lake Access Task Force FROM: SUBJECT: At the last Lake Access Task Force meeting May 12, 1993, the Task Force directed that a report be drafted. The LMCD Lake Access Committee, the MN DNR and LMCD staff have all contributed to this draft report. . The draft report is ready at this time for comment of the current Lake Access Task Force spokespersons. Interested parties may also comment. A meeting for public review of the draft report is set for: 7:00 pm, Wednesday, May II, 1994 Norwest Bank Building Conference Room 135 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata Handicapped entrance on Wayzata Blvd. west entrance . Task Force member cities and participating agencies will have an opportunity following this meeting to offer additional comment. Following an appropriate comment period, to be determined by the Lake Access Task Force spokes persons, a meeting of the Task Force will be called to consider final report acceptance. I want to thank each of you for the many hours of work you have put into this project. Your contributions have made this report possible. I believe we can take pride in the policy recommendations contained in the report. City and agency spokespersons are asked to please confirm their attendance by calling the LMCD, 473-7033, by May 9. Please bring the enclosed report for discussion purposes. I look forward to thanking you personally on May 11. #~ . . 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 DRAFT REPORT OF THE 1992 LAKE MINNETONKA LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE To The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District DRAFT COpy April 15,1994 DRAFT DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SuI11II18.1)r and Conclusions .................................................................. 1 History and Background .................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Task Force Goals ........................................................................... 5 Existing Access ............................................................................. 6 Goal of 700 Carrrrailer Parking Spaces ..................................................... 6 Elimination of Street Carrrrailer Parking .................................................... 7 Parking Standards for CarrrrailerParking ................................................... 7 . Parking Inventory ........................................................................... 8 Parking Agreements and DNR Cost Sharing ..................... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 New Access Sites.......................................................................... 10 Equitable Distribution ...................................................................... 10 Marina Potential for Lake Access .......................................................... 10 Proceedings Summary .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. ... .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . 11 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 11 . DRAFT DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake MinnetonkaAccess Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Access to Lake Minnetonka via riparian homeowners, commercial marinas, yacht clubs, out lot docks, and municipal docks primarily for non-riparian property owners is significant in quantity and percent of overall access and generally of high quality. 2. There is a lack of quality, free, reliable car/trailer parking for boats wanting to access Lake Minnetonka via boat launch ramps. There is not a lack of poor quality free car/trailer parking. Currently, there are over 700 spaces used on the busiest days. 3. Poor quality parking results in residents complaining about boater's intrusive behavior and excessive traffic congestion. It results in extreme frustration by boaters over the lack of a decent place to park to go boating on Lake Minnetonka This generates tension between the local community interest and the car/trailer boater interest. . 4. If the car/trailers currently parked near the lake could be put in well organized places with adequate, safe parking conditions with car/trailer turnarounds, the local communities would benefit from reduced congestion and less intrusion on their neighborhoods. 5. The task force reaffirmed the conclusions of two prior studies that 700 high quality, free, reliable car/trailer parking spaces are fair and reasonable for Lake Minnetonka and are achievable. 6. The Task Force concluded that when quality free reliable car/trailer parking spaces are provided in a zone, all other street car/trailer parking ought to be closed in that zone with enforced "no car trailer parking signs" 7. Because over 700 car/trailer spots are used today, providing 700 quality free, reliable, car/trailer spaces will not increase the number of boats on the lake but actually create a modest reduction. . 8. Every other year, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District is to certify (LMCD) (by count) and publish on a map showing the locations and the number offree, reliable, car/trailer parking spaces that meet the standards established by this task force. 9. Car/trailer parking meeting the physical standards noted elsewhere in this report will be certifiable by the LMCD as counting toward the 700 goal on the following basis. a. 100% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count if: · There is a parking agreement OR · The street or remote parking is posted "car/trailer only" b. 80% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count if: · There are signs at the launch ramp showing where to park. · There are street signs pointing out the direction to the launch ramp · The ramp and parking location can be put on an access map. c. 60% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count if: · none of the above conditions are met DRAFT Page 1 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 d. The LMCD will work cooperatively with the cities, Hennepin County, and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to replace spaces should they be lost for car trailer parking. 10. Existing ramps without turnarounds that require backing car/trailers offbusy county roads or city streets should be closed only after a quality facility meeting the standards has been completed to replace it. 11. To. achieve the goal of 700 car/trailer parking spaces cooperation is needed a. Additional parking agreements are needed for as many existing sites as possible. This may include payments by the DNR under cooperative agreements. b. Some street and remote lots need "car/trailer only" signs. c. Signs need to be placed at launch ramps showing where to park. d. Street signs need to be installed showing direction to the ramps. e. The LMCD and the DNR need to negotiate with some commercial marinas to provide free car/trailer parking for the public that can be certified. Negotiations may include payments by the DNR and/or other incentives by the LMCD. f Make ready docks need to be installed at ramps where remote car/trailer parking is used. g. New access sites (launch ramps) need to be developed with the cooperation of the local . cities, the LMCD, the DNR, and with other agencies of government. The majority of. funding ought to come from regional and/or state sources. Cities are not usually expected to pay a significant portion of improved car/trailer parking even though their local community may benefit. 12 The 1993 LMCD Car/Trailer Parking Inventory Total In Use that Meet Total 1992 Total in the Additional Total In Current and Total in Use that Reliability Future Use and Potential Use or Meets the Standard & Planned Planned Parking Space CarfTrailer Available Physical LMCD to be LMCD Categories Inventory Today Standard Certified Certified Certified . In Access Lots 360 259 239 239 124 363 In Remote lots 93 93 70 43 27 70 On the Street 282 215 114 97 17 83 GRAND TOTAL 735 567 423 379 168 516 13. For the new public access at Maxwell Bay successful cooperation with Orono and additional regional or state funding will be required. 14. Car/trailer access must be distributed equitably around the lake. When a community can not provide access, that community needs to help fund accesses in neighboring communities. Communities without access may be asked to pay an equitable share for maintenance to communities with car/trailer parking. DRAFT Page 2 DRAFT 1992 LMeD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 HISTORY AND BACKGROUND Launch ramps and car-trailer parking at Lake Minnetonka have been under discussion for many years. The Minnesota State Constitution states that the waters of the state will be free and open to the public. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in response to the Outdoor Recreation Act 1975 (Minnesota Statue 86A.Ol-l1) established a policy to "provide free and adequate public access to all of Minnesota's lakes consistent with demand and resource capabilities". This policy has been carried out throughout the state, usually with the cooperation of the local community which usually sees a launch ramp with free car/trailer parking as a benefit. To obtain this free access, the DNR set policies for what constitutes reliable, free car/trailer parking. The DNR attempts to utilize the following guidelines: . 1. One car/trailer parking space for every 20 acres oflake surface Lake Minnetonka's 14,000 acres requires a minimum of 700 spaces. 2. Ramps with remotes lots must have signs showing where to park the car/trailer. 3. There must be street signs on major roads near the ramp showing the direction to the ramp. 4. Car/trailer parking spaces must be in sight and less than 1500 feet from the launch ramp. 5. Street or remote lot parking doesn't count. 6. Car/trailer parking spaces must be available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 7. Car only spots for car-top boats don't count. 8. Parking must be free except in parks where the same fee is charged all park users. Because the DNR did not recognize existing car/trailer parking spaces that did not meet their standards they determined that there were only 143 car/trailer parking spaces on Lake Minnetonka. They published information and testified before various bodies that there were only 143 car/trailer parking spaces for Lake Minnetonka when there should be 700 minimum according to their standard of one per twenty acres. People outside the lake area communities got the impression that the Lake area was trying to keep people off "their lake" so they could keep it for themselves. The DNR continued to pursue a policy of trying to obtain launch ramps and car/trailer parking on Lake Minnetonka. On the other hand, the local lake area communities believed counts showing 1,000 to 1,200 empty trailers ~~ached to cars parked around the lake on the nice weekend days. They claimed there were substantially wnore than the 700 car/trailer parking spaces and the lake didn't need any more car/trailer parking. In fact, they claimed that the boats off the trailers were the major cause of the increased crowding on the lake. What followed was more than a decade of struggles between the DNR and the local Lake Minnetonka communities over launch ramps and free car/trailer parking. In 1982, the DNR announced plans to purchase property at King's Point to develop a launch ramp with free car/trailer parking that met their standards. The local communities claimed 1,200 car/trailer spaces existed and vigorously objected to the DNR plan. In 1983, an appeal to the governor resulted in the launch ramp project being canceled and a Governor's Access Study Commission being appointed to study access on Lake Minnetonka. (The King's Point launch ramp was built in 1987). The commission issued a report that: 1. Public parking availability is a crucial component of adequate boat launch facilities. 2. 700 car/trailer parking spaces is fair and reasonable for Lake Minnetonka. 3. Equitable distribution of car/trailer parking around the lake is desirable. 4. Parking standards for Lake Minnetonka may need to be adjusted. DRAFT Page 3 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 . After the report was issued, there was no rush to build the 700 car/trailer parking places by any body or agency. The lake area communities believed there were more than the 700 car/trailer parking spaces called for in the report and the lake didn't need another 700. They questioned why the local communities should pay to build car/trailer parking for people outside their area, even though community residents were also users. Because of the lack of action in providing for the needed car/trailer parking, the Metropolitan Council did another lake access study in 1986. It confirmed the 700 car/trailer parking space amount as being a fair and reasonable number. In 1987, as a result of no action in providing car/trailer parking spaces and no plans to build them, the Metropolitan Council told the LMCD that they would seek state legislative action for a regional or state agency to take over governing of Lake Minnetonka to be assured the car/trailer parking was provided, unless the LMCD prepared a formal plan showing how the car/trailer parking would be accomplished. The LMCD believed the car/trailer parking could not be considered without developing an overall long range management plan for the lake that would include adequate free car/trailer parking. The LMCD Management Plan was published at the end of 1990 and approved in December 1991. The LMCD Management Plan which the DNR, the Metropolitan Council, the cities and many others . helped develop, reaffirmed the 700 car/trailer parking space goal as being fair and reasonable. Three additional fundamental points were discussed: 1. F or Lake Minnetonka 700 parking spaces would be both the minimum and the maximum. 2. Once the 700 car/trailer spaces are established, other street car/trailer parking ought to be eliminated. The cities and the county will be encouraged to erect and enforce "no car/trailer parking" signs as long as the 700 goal continues to be met. 3. The LMCD, with assistance from the DNR, should review the existing parking quality standards to determine if some adjustments could be made for the special situation on Lake Minnetonka. In the fall of 1991, the DNR took an option on property on Maxwell Bay with the intent of developing a launch ramp with free car/trailer parking. Objections surfaced in the city of Orono. Orono tried to persuade the DNR not to exercise its option on the property until a plan for the entire lake was developed . according to the LMCD management plan. At this time, the LMCD was just beginning to organize its Access Committee. When the DNR purchased the Maxwell Bay property, the DNR commissioner wrote a letter to both the LMCD and the city of Orono. The letter stated that the DNR would postpone development of the Maxwell Bay property until a task force appointed by the LMCD developed a detailed plan for car/trailer parking for all of Lake Minnetonka. DRAFT Page 4 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 INTRODUCTION The Lake Access Task Force was recommended by the commissioner of the DNR, and convened by a LMCD resolution in January, 1992. The purpose of this task force was to develop a detailed plan to meet the lake access objectives in the LMCD Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka. The LMCD invited representatives from 1. Its member cities 2. Government agencies sharing responsibility for the management of Lake Minnetonka, including; the DNR, Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County, Hennepin Parks, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and others. 3. Interested citizen's groups such as the Minnesota Sportfishing Congress (MSC), Fisherman Advocating Intelligent Regulation (FAIR), the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA), and others For a roster, see APPENDIX 1, page 12 Subcommittees of this group conducted detailed studies and submitted their reports to the task force. Meetings began in March of 1992 and continued through May of 1993. Staff from the LMCD and the ~NR assisted. Participants gave generously of their time and support. The LMCD Lake Access ~ommittee drafted this final report. Appendices to this report contain information to document: 1. Task Force spokespersons (ORIGINAL DESIGNEES) 2. Existing public access sites and commercial marinas (map 1) 3. Standards for car/trailer parking; 4. 1992 Current and Potential CarITrailer Parking Inventory 5. Model Parking Agreement 6. DNR Landowner's Bill of Rights 7. DNR Acquistion Procedure 8. Access site criteria for evaluation 9. Lake Zone Map 2 10. Proceedings summary . TASK FORCE GOALS The goals adopted by the 1992 Task Force were to: 1. Review all types of existing boater access to Lake Minnetonka. * 2. Affirm the prior goal of 700 certifiable car/trailer parking spaces for reliable free public access to Lake Minnetonka. 3. Affirm the Management Plan goal of closing street parking to car/trailers as the 700 car/trailer parking goal is reached. 4. Establish standards for certifying car/trailer parking that meet the special needs of Lake Minnetonka and the boating public. 5. Conduct a reliable, detailed inventory of existing car/trailer parking spaces. Count potential car/trailer parking spaces. 6. Develop a model car/trailer parking agreement and obtain agreements where possible. 7. Explore prospective access sites and develop a list of sites for potential development. 8. Review the principle and define equitable distribution. 9. Examine the possibility for commercial marinas to provide some free public car/trailer parking. DRAFT Page 5 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 * The focus ofthis Task Force was on the free public access to the lake via car/trailer parking at boat launch ramps. In the process of this study, a review was made of many other kinds of access. )see APPENDIX 2, page 13). EXISTING ACCESS The Task Force reviewed the studies done by the LMCD, DNR, task forces, 1991 and 1992 LMCD boat count, the 1992 LMLOA car/trailer count study, and the 1993 Jabbour aerial car/trailer survey. The following table categorizes access to Lake Minnetonka. Boat Storage Count and Nice Weekend In Use Boat Count by Origination 1992 Boats Percent of Boats Stored Stored that are at docks Active on the Water & Racks Max Peak Count Ave Peak Use Count Percent of Boats On the Water . Where Boats Originate (4) (1) Max Peak Avg Peak (2)(5) (3)(5) (5) Riparian Residents & Out Lots 5,973 9% 6% 530 379 29 % Comm'l Marinas & Yacht Clubs 1,862 29% 21% 549 392 30 % Municipal docks 1,012 33% 23% 329 235 18 % Car/trailer launch ramp N/A 421 300 23 % TOTAL REF 1,829 1,306 100 % 1. From 1992 LMCD Boat Count adjusted by estimating empty racks & unrented slips at Commercial Marinas, Yacht Clubs, and Municipal docks 2. Single Weekend Day Peak Use Study: 1984=1836, 1986=2142, 1987=2252, 1992=1829 3. Average Weekend Peak Use Study: 1984=1318, 1986=1453, 1987=1370, 1992=1306 4. Active maximum peak use count uses estimate assuming the average peak use proportions remain constant for the maximum peak use. 5. 1992 LMCD/DNR aerial count of boats in use on nice Saturday and Sunday afternoons. . GOAL OF 700 CARlTRAILER PARKING SPACES The task force confirmed the goal of 700 reliable free car/trailer parking spaces and agreed with the goal of closing street parking to car/trailers as the 700 car/trailer parking goal becomes established. This agrees with the 1991 LMCD Management Plan. It is compatible with the policy of one parking place for every 20 acres of water surface. It is the minimum number of spaces required under the DNR public water access program in the metropolitan area. The goal of 700 was first established by the task forces of 1983 and confirmed in the study of 1986. It is conservative, considering that the demand for boating recreation exceeds 1 parking space per 20 acres of water on most of the metropolitan area lakes. Compared to standards in other parts of the country, it is also conservative. Some states provide 1 parking space per 10 acres of water surface. DRAFT Page 6 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 The TaSk Force considered lowering the goal. The Lake Minnetonka Lake Shore Owners Association (LMLOA) believes that 700 parking spaces would increase boat density and reduce the enjoyment of the lake by lakeshore users. Taking into consideration that there are over 700 car/trailer spaces used to access the lake now, and street parking will be eliminated when the 700 goal is reached, the net effect will be fewer boats on the lake and no increases in density. Thus, the 700 goal was reaffirmed. ELIMINATION OF STREET CARlTRAILER PARKING There was consideration in the LMCD Management Plan whereby other street car/trailer parking would be eliminated as the goal of 700 was being established, and when the 700 goal was complete, all other street parking ought to be removed as a way of limiting crowding on the lake. Task Force data made clear that currently, on a good day many more than 700 car/trailers are parked around the lake. Therefore, when the 700 goal is met and other street parking is abolished there will be a net decrease in boats on the lake from car/trailers. PARKING STANDARDS FOR CARlTRAILER PARKING . Earlier task force parking standards for quality, reliable free car/trailer parking for Lake Minnetonka were reviewed. Access design, location of parking, security of personal property, and safety of boaters maneuvering their car/trailers, were among considerations discussed in reaching agreement on the physical standards. After much discussion the Task Force adopted the following physical standards: see APPENDIX 3,: pages 14 and 15: 1. 700 is a fair and reasonable number without increases in the future. 2. Car/trailer parking must be within 2000 feet of the ramp. 3. Street or remote lot car/trailer parking over 1500 feet from a ramp must have a make ready dock.. 4. 350 of the 700 spaces must be available 7 days per week, 24 hours per day. 350 must be available on weekends, and 350 may have limited hours. 5. Up to 10% of the spaces at anyone ramp location may be spaces for cars only (assumes cartop boats) . 6. Parking must be free except in parks where the same fee is charged all park users. . 7. Ramps offbusy highways or streets must have a turnaround to prevent car/trailers from backing down from busy roads. The Task Force agreed that every other year the LMCD should take a physical inventory of the actual car/trailer parking around the lake and certify the number that meet the above physical standards as well as reliability standards listed below.. Car/trailer parking space meeting the physical standards listed in APPENDIX 3 will be certifiable by the LMCD as counting toward the 700 goal on the following basis: a. 100% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count if: · There is a parking agreement OR · The street or remote parking is signed "car/trailer only" b. 80% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count if · There are signs at the launch ramp showing where to park. · There are street signs pointing out the direction to the launch ramp. · The ramp and parking locations can be put on an access map c. 60% of the street or remote lot parking spaces will count ifnone of the above are met. DRAFT Page 7 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 The changes from prior standards allow the Task Force greater flexibility in certifying more car/trailer parking spaces. As can be seen in this report, the number increased from 143 to 516. PARKING INVENTORY To determine the number of existing and potential car/trailer parking spaces capable of being certified to the newly adopted standards, data was gathered from a variety of sources and in a number of ways. Site lists were provided by LMCD member cities. Site visits were made and aerial photographs were used. Spaces inventoried included: 1. Parking in on-site lots at existing lake access points 2. Available on-street parking within 2,000 feet 3. Off-site lots, public and private 4. Future additional committed spaces 5. Car/trailer parking spaces potentially available The total potential car/trailer parking spaces certifiable to the new physical standards was 735. (The original inventory is in APPENDIX. 4 page 16). Substantially higher numbers of car/trailers are being parked free at peak times in good weather than the inventory has identified. The 1993 LMCD Car/Trailer Parking Total In Use Total 1992 Total in that Meet the Additional Total in Current and Total Use that Reliability Future Use and Parking Space Potential In Use or Meets the Standard & Planned Planned Categories CarlTrailer Available Physical LMCD to be LMCD Inventory Today Standard Certified Certified Certified In Access Lots North Arm 65 80 80 80 0 80 Grays Bay Csway 37 37 17 17 0 17 Grays Bay Dam 20 20 20 20 0 20 Spring Park 148 86 86 86 0 86 Kings Point 0 32 32 32 0 32 Phelps Bay 10 4 4 4 0 4 Henn. Reg. Park 80 0 0 0 48 48 Maxwell Bay N/A 0 0 0 76 76 SUBTOTAL 360 259 239 239 124 363 In Remote lots Carsons Bay 93 93 70 43 27 70 On the Street North Arm 31 31 31 31 0 0 Williams St. 40 40 40 40 0 40 Cooks Bay 110 43 43 26 17 43 Wayzata Bay 101 101 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 282 215 114 97 17 83 GRAND TOTAL 735 567 423 379 168 516 DRAFT Page 8 DRAFT . . 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 The Task Force recognizes there is additional car/trailer parking beyond 2000 feet that is available today and not part of the above count. It, also, recognizes there are additional small launch ramps in use and available today that are not in the above count. This report adopts a new and lower inventory in an effort to be very conservative after consultation with Hennepin County and the cities. The revised total inventory of 516 car trailer spaces represents parking that is available now, or that can reasonably be made available on a stable long-term basis. There are approximately 379 car/trailer parking spaces currently available and that are being certified by the LMCD. Of these, approximately 282 spaces are in public access lots. An additional 97 spaces are in on-street parking sites. Approximately 168 future spaces are either committed or negotiable. Note that when Maxwell Bay is completed, 31 on street spaces will be eliminated. This results in a total of 516 potential car/trailer parking spaces that are now believed to be available or planned and which meet the new parking standards and that can be certified by the LMCD. Parking agreements need to be reached with communities, counties, agencies and private commercial marinas to convert some existing parking from uncertified to certified . PARKING AGREEMENTS AND DNR COST SHARING . One result of the 1986 task force was the improvement in the process that secures parking spaces at or near existing public access sites that can be considered to be "reliable". To make new or existing parking reliable over the years a parking agreement can be secured with the property owner that requires the car/trailer parking to remain available in place unless canceled under the agreement. If the parking spaces are lost, a good faith effort will be made to replace them with other parking spaces somewhere else. The LMCD and the DNR will assist communities to relocate them. The Task Force continued this recommendation and developed a current model agreement. The Lake Access Parking Agreement form and checklist for evaluating public access parking agreements are provided in APPENDIX 5, page 17-19. These agreements should be between the LMCD and the local unit of government or property owner. The DNR will assist with these agreements by providing funding where appropriate. The DNR can share cost with cities and/or agencies on access and parking facilities improvement, including land acquisition. The DNR by cooperative "agreement can reimburse cities for dedicated to free car/trailer parking. . The DNR Landowner's Bill of Rights describes the procedure used by the DNR in the purchase of potential access sites. The Lake Minnetonka acquisition process is the DNR commitment to work cooperatively in this area. (see APPENDIX 6 and 7 pages 20-24) The first agreement was signed in May of 1993 with the City ofMinnetrista. The agreement with that city was for a total of 44 parking spaces at the following sites: 1. Williams Street in Halsteds Bay: 40 car/trailer parking spaces 2. Tuxedo Boulevard in Phelps Bay: 4 car/trailer parking spaces Other sites also have a high potential for adding to reliable parking by agreement, namely: 1. Orono: a. Hennepin County North Ann ramp and on-site lot (80 spaces) b. County Road 51, serving Hennepin County North Arm ramp (31 spaces) 2. Spring Park Bay, Spring Park, with accompanying county maintenance yard nearby in Orono (86 spaces) 3. Deephaven: a. Carsons Bay, Minnetonka Blvd. ramp with city maintenance lot (30 spaces) DRAFT Page 9 DRAFT 1992 LMCD Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 b. Carsons Bay, Minnetonka Blvd. ramp with school lot on Vmehill Road (40 spaces) 4. Wayzata: Wayzata Bay County Road 16 ramp, County Road 16 (40 spaces) 5. Mound: Mound Park Bay ramp, Cooks Bay (43 spaces) NEW ACCESS SITES The Task Force recommends the following sites as having the potential for becoming lake access sites. The Site Evaluation Criteria are provided in APPENDIX 8 page 25. . Potential Sites 1. Tonka Bay City Dock, channel to Gideon's Bay 2. Timber Lane, Gideons Bay, Shorewood 3. Mai- Tai Restaurant Site, Excelsior Bay, Excelsior (property was sold) 4. 456 Arlington Ave., Wayzata Bay (private residence), Wayzata 5. Pelican Point, Spring Park Bay, Mound 6. Lost Lake, Cooks Bay, Mound 7. Advance Machine, West Ann, Spring Park Grays Bay Causeway The unimproved substandard public access on Trunk Highway 101 will not be redeveloped as planned. This represents a setback for public access development. The 32 spaces planned for the causeway had been considered committed. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has abandoned plans to improve the site. However, Wayzata and Minnetonka are continuing discussions about improvements at the site. Maxwell Bay Up to 76 additional car/trailer parking spaces may be provided when the launch ramp is in place at Maxwell Bay, Orono. This site continues to be examined. DNR Trails & Waterways and the City of Orono are negotiating to purchase alternate properties. . EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION Subcommittees discussed equitable distribution of car/trailer parking at Lake Minnetonka. The principle . adopted in earlier task force reports of dividing the lake into zones with equitable distribution was endorsed. (see APPENDIX 9, page 26). Each city is encouraged to contribute to the overall goal. Ifit cannot contribute it may be asked to make voluntary payments for maintenance to those cities who do provide car/trailer access. MARINA POTENTIAL FOR LAKE ACCESS During the summer months most marinas have relatively empty boat storage lots that have the potential for parking car/trailers if the marina has a launch ramp. Many now provide some fee based boat launching service. These marinas could possibly provide some free car/trailer parking and ramp use to the public. The operators or owners might expect some type of reimbursement. The DNR could possibly provide funding and the LMCD will cooperate. The Task Force identified six conditions and issues to be considered in detennining the potential free public access use of marinas: 1. Ability to extend existing capacity. DRAFT . Page 10 DRAFT 1992 LMen Lake Minnetonka Access Task Force Report Revised Draft 4-15-1994 2. Extent to which a marina already serves the public through fee paid access. (Fee paid public access does not meet the definition of free and open public access.) 3. Attitude of nearby homeowners toward public access use. 4. Duration of public use, considered for a trial basis only until proven feasible. 5. Management issues, such as reserving parking for public use, and compensation to the marina owner consistent with public access operations and public policy. 6. Possible DNR funding constraints from annual operations budgets and overall cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS The Lake Access Task Force study is documented in a proceedings summary. This chronology highlights the various subcommittee, committee, and Task Force meetings which took place among city agency, and community organizations. These groups participated in the research, deliberations and consensus findings. See APPENDIX 10, pages 27-35. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . This study depended upon collaboration of community representatives, municipal, regional and state officials. Task force meetings provided a public platform for full discussion of access to Lake Minnetonka. Subcommittee members invested extensive volunteer hours. All participants deserve recognition. The Task force thanks every individual and organization for their contributions. . DRAFT Page 11 DRAFT Appendix 1 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE DESIGNATED SPOKESPERSON (Original Appointees by Organizations) NAME POSITIONrrITLE ORGANIZATION James N. Grathwol Board Member LMCD, City of Excelsior (Task Force Chair) Richard Engebretson Mayor City of Deephaven Lucille Crow Mayor City of Excelsior Alan M. Albrecht Mayor City of Greenwood Ann Perry Planning Director City of Minnetonka Tom Markle City Council City of Minnetonka Wally Clevenger Mayor City of Minnetrista Skip Johnson Mayor City of Mound Gabriel Jabbour City Council City of Orono Kristy Stover City Council City of Shorewood . Jerry Rockvam Mayor City of Spring Park Vem Haug Mayor City of Tonka Bay Jerry Schmieg Mayor City of Victoria Barry Petit City Council City of Wayzata Nick Duff Mayor City of Woodland Tad Jude Commissioner Hennepin County Douglas Bryant Superintendent Hennepin Parks Don Germanson President Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association Thomas S. Maple Manager Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Gary Larson Co-Chair Fisherman Advocating Intelligent Regulation John F. Schneider President MN Sportfishing Congress . Beverly Blomberg Orono Resident Maxwell Bay Residents AGENCY STAFF Dennis Asmussen Director MN DNR Trails & Waterways Mike Markell Water Recreati on MN DNR Trails & Waterways Supervisor Gordon Kimball Regional Supervisor MN DNR Trails & Waterways Martha Reger Area Supervisor MN DNR Trails & Waterways Larry Killien Regional Supervisor MN DNR Trails & Waterways Donald W. Buckhout AD R Coordinator State Office of Planning Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director LMCD Rachel Thibault Adminis. Technician LMCD Page 12 en w t- - en en en w o o <( o - -I to ::) c.. G Z i= en - >< w - .t:. .t:. as ~ ~ .t:. ~m ~U) - en m'C mc U) me! cu cu cu cu- ca ca:!:: :: =.:JJ:. m ::> mm c c= N mO -.: -u .. ca >( en .. mOo as ca_ ~ U)Oo U) U)E mG) :E :Em c cu G)- 0 U cu- - -c e.. U G) u- .! u um ca- e.. \0 U.c u -.t:. <: ~ .:( .:( .:(~ .. Uu uO cu "c .!:! u~ E G) = :is == -- E ca \0 .co -m E E- = .co Q. =.t:. ~E 0 o G) Q.U) 0 .o.! en . D . ~ <( Z - ~ a: M G) <( N ~ :E -I <( - o a: w :E :E o () c z <( ,.. a. <( ~ N r-- .-t .-t N M - o eo t': ~ N .-t M ~ ........ r-- .-t ........ .-t 0 .-t .-t z~ '@ CD .j..J .J ctl 0 :i 'R ::> LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Existing Public Access Sites and Commercial Marinas 1 Beans Greenwood Marina* 2 Causeway - Hwy. 101 2A Chapman Place Marina 3 Cochrane Boat Yards* 4 Crystal Bay Service* 5 CurIys Minnetonka Marina 6 Deephaven, City of 6A Dennis Boats* 7 Gayle Marina 8 Grays Bay Access (by Dam) 9 Grays Bay Resort & Marina 10 Halsted Drive Access 11 Hendrickson Bridge Access 12 Howards Point Marina 12A Kreslins* 13 Kings Point Access - DNR 14 Lakeside Marina 15 Minnetonka Boat Rental * 16 Minnetonka Boat Works (W) & (0)* 17 Mound, City of 18 North Shore Drive Marina 19 Rockvam Boat yards 20 Sailors W orId Marina 20A Schmitts Marina* 21 Shorewood Yacht Club & Marina* 22 Spring Park Access 23 Excel Marina 24 Tonka Bay Marina 25 Wayzata, City of 26 Windward Marine* 27 Tuxedo Road Access St Albans Bay Grays Bay Cooks Bay St Albans & Excelsior Crystal Bay Lower Lake South Carsons Bay Lower Lake South Maxwell Bay Grays Bay Grays Bay Halsted Bay North Arm South Upper Lake St Albans Bay Halsted Bay Maxwell Bay Harrisons Bay Wayzata,Tanager,Browns Bay Cooks Bay Maxwell Bay Coffee Cove Smiths Bay Excelsior Bay Gideons Bay Spring Park Bay St Albans Bay Lower Lake South Wayzata Bay Browns Bay Phelps Bay . . *No launching facilities 11/17/93 Appendix 3 PARKING STANDARDS LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC ACCESSES The 1992 Lake Minnetonka Lake Access Task Force has adopted the goal of 700 long-term reliable spaces for car/trailer parking in the vicinity of present and future access sites at Lake Minnetonka. The Task Force further agrees that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) implement these standards for identifying and counting of car/trailer parking spaces and monitor progress toward the 700 goal on a continuing basis. The following set of standards has been adopted by the Task Force for application to Lake Minnetonka: . 3. 4. . 1. All spaces must be within 2,000' of a public access point. For car/trailers parked between 1,500' and 2,000', a temporary boat mooring facility at the ramp site for a number of boats equal to 10% of the parking spaces must be provided. All parking locations away from the access site should be provided with a long-term agreement, three year minimum, with five years more desirable, on file with the LMCD. Within that time availability, if any designated spaces need to be removed, they must be replaced with comparable spaces. The location of parking spaces, either off-street or on-street away from the access site, must be identified by clear, aesthetically attractive, consolidated, capable of being inexpensively updated, slgnage. All off-street spaces must be illustrated on a plan on file with the LMCD. The plan shall clearly indicate each car/trailer space and adequate ingress, egress and maneuvering space. Parking space minimum size standards (in feet): Vehicle only 9 X 19 (Handicapped 12 x 19) Car/trailer lOX 40 Off-street designated trailer parking on grass is acceptable if vehicle is parked on graded/paved surface. 5. All spaces must be available on an unrestricted, first-come-first-served basis, 700 reliable spaces will be available from Memorial Day to Labor Day from 5 pm on Fridays until midnight Sundays, and on holidays. Fifty per cent of reliable spaces will be available weekdays. Hours of availability will be determined by LMCD in cooperation with the DNR. Vehicle-only spaces (no trailer) on public access parking lots can be counted toward the total goal of 700 car/trailer spaces provided that the number of such spaces counted for any given lot does not exceed 10% of the total number of spaces on that lot. (Example: Out of 50 total parking spaces on a lot, seven are for vehicle only. Only five of the seven may be counted toward the goal of 700 [i.e., 10% of 50=5].) Page 14 LMCD PARKING STANDARDS FOR LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC ACCESSES 6. All on-street spaces should meet the following additional standards: 6.1 Minimum length of 50 feet per space. 6.2 Adequate shoulder width to preclude door opening into a traffic lane and to provide a safe route to the access point. 6.3 Of the total non-designated (non-signed) on-street parking spaces, only 80% are considered to be reliable in order to account for non-access related public parking. 6.4 Designated and signed on-street car/trailer parking spaces will be counted 100% for car/trailer use. 6.5 On-street car/trailer parking spaces must be illustrated on a plan by street name on file with the LMCD. Page 15 . . >- ~ o E- Z UJ ;;> Z - . ~ ~ -< ~ ~ UJ .J - -< ~ E- -. ~ -< U .J -< E= z UJ E- O , -< E- Z UJ ~ ~ ::J U :E 8 8- CIS CIS .= 0.. ~ oenN l:lO (l) ... Z "'0 U'l ~ (l) ... g . e en "'0"'0 a o -<u (l)~ "'" c: 2.9 ~.~ U'l c: (l) o.~:::;" U "'0 U'l ~~~o U'l::>"",o _ _ 0 CIS >.~ ~ c:- ::IN o ... l:lO .p 5 (l) ... :.al::~ "'0 ::I CIS -<u >.(l)U'l c:c~ (l)~- ""'.- c: 5 ~.- u-< N 0\ 0\ - ~B~o o (l) ""'0 E-:C~o~ _ClSC:N .~ t.;: ;s 0 c .f en ... ~ d ~ c.. Z NIN 010 -1- c<"l c<"l c<"llc<"l \0\0 \01\0 0\ 0\ U'l U'l (l) U U -< as "'" 0 -<... .c ..c: ::I ten o Z ~ o o -. II) c: o N 0\ c<"l - -. - o 0 1""-1 I""- c<"l c<"l 00010 N N OO~I~ I""- 0 01 I""- -N c<"l ~~ol~ -1- >. CIS ~ (l) ~ a CIS ell >. UOell >. >. l%l ~ eIlell~O l%ll%lell.:o U'l VI N ::I >. >. >. en ell ell ell OO~ ~ ~ - -. N c<"llc<"l \0 \0 010 010 c<"l c<"l 010 c<"llc<"l 0\ 0\ >.- eIl~ l%l 0 U'l ... c:.c o ::l ~en ell U tr) tr) -. c<"l N \0100 \0 \0 0010 ~ ~It! \0 01\0 - 00 0100 ~-tr) "'0 1: l%l o "'0 >.(1) ell >< l%l~ ~-.- "'" >. ~ ell ell 0 ~l%l... OI)VI.c c: 0.. ::l ._ - en "'" II) o...s::: en~ \0 N -. ~ o NOl""-I 0\ - c<"l~ 000010 00 00 0000c<"l1- N 1""-0 - -- c<"l - NO 0 OIN c<"l c<"l -- -- c<"l M - - 000010 ~ 00 -Ic<"l -IN ~ "- ell c.. ell :: ... 0 (l) . Oil e II) c~" >.~ .0 U'l c: ell 0 ~ a.o. l%l .:0 ~".~ ~ ~ ,:;! - = :: 0"" .E.- II) 0 ~~:r:u \0 c<"l .... -. tr) 0\ - N ~ >< :.a c: II) 0. 0. -< 8 - 8 c<"l 0011 ~ - ... c: II) a (l) (l) "'" l:lO ell II) ..c: ... '- o ~ (l) .> II) "'" o ... U'l ... II) ~ ].~ "'0 ::l "'" ell U'l ell ~ .~ c.. o~ ~ c: .C;; 0 5 ~ .Oil uz~ ::0 c: (l) 0 ... ._ .c - c: 0.. ~ 8.0 ~ .~ v:. c.. 5 ~ - _U'l :I: "'0 .= ~ (l) (l) ..c: . - ..c: > .~ ~ ... .~ ~ II) '0 ~ ...; -5 01) -;: B ~ .E II) c: OI)U~& .= a ~ 0 ~::""'(l) ""'lI)eIl..c: ~ c: 0..... ._ "'" c: "'" ell II) 0 ~a==o.. .- CIS::I e >':: (l) .:t:: c"'i::;.~ "'" ::l ell U'l ell 0 U U'l uUN:.2 ~c:c<"l'" c: .- 01) II) .9 0. c: VI ... ~.= B "'0 c:.~ U "'0 II) >< 0 -<:r:UJ'" II) 01) ell ~ \0 - tr)! c<"li r- .J -< E- o E- ------ - Nc<"l --- . . Appendix 5 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1993 Lake Access Model Parking Agreement This Agreement is made between the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) and the ( ) both public corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS the LMCD and ( ) are jointly concerned with providing public boating access to Lake Minnetonka, meeting the Parking Standards for Lake Minnetonka, and WHEREAS the LMCD and ( ) recognize that a goal of 700 car/trailer spaces will be provided in the vicinity of present and future access sites around the lake on as equitable a basis as possible, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the LMCD and ( ) that the conditions for car/trailer parking for the public access identified on the checklist identified as Exhibit "A" and Parking Site Plan identified as Exhibit "B" meet Parking Standards on the checklist as indicated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LMCD and ( ) have caused this agreement to be duly executed this _ day of ,19_. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT: AGENCY/CITY: By By Page 17 EXHIBIT A Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka Public Access Carrrrailer Parking Agreements 1. Access Name 2. Access City Lake Zone No. 3. Carrrrailer (Crr) Parking by Location: # of spaces a. Off-street, on access site ................. (On-site designated trailer parking on grass is acceptable if vehicle is parked on graded or paved surface.) b. Off-street, remote from access site. . . . . . . . . . . * Distance in feet from access site c. On-street, less than 1,500 feet: * Designated signed crr only, count 100% of Clr parking spaces available ............ * Not signed, count 75% of spaces available d. On-street, 1,501 feet to 2,000 feet: * Designated signed crr only, count 100% of crr parking spaces available ............ * Not signed, count 75% of spaces available . 4. Vehicle Only Parking Spaces - these count up to 10% of total number of crr spaces on lot: # of standard vehicles spaces 9' x 19' # of handicapped vehicle spaces 12' x 19' Total # of vehicle only spaces . . . . . . . Count total vehicle only spaces or 10% of total crr parking spaces in lots whichever is less 5. Total, car/trailer parking spaces at site ............ . COOPERATING PROVISIONS: Initial as accepted: 1. Access site plan illustrating each crr space with adequate ingress, egress, and maneuvering space is kept on file and current with LMCD. 2. Signage provided at access site is clear, aesthetically attractive, consolidated for easy updating. 3. All spaces are available on unrestricted, first- come, first-served basis, from Memorial Day to Labor Day, 5:00 pm Friday until midnight Sunday. Fifty percent (50%) of spaces meeting Parking Standards are available weekdays. Page 18 . . EXHIBIT A Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka Public Access Carrrrailer Parking Agreement 4. All on-street parking spaces meet the following standards: a. Minimum length of 50 feet per space. b. Adequate shoulder width to preclude door opening into traffic lane. c. Safe pedestrian route to access point provided. d. On-street car/trailer parking spaces are illustrated and kept current on a plan by street name on file with the LMCD. 5. A temporary boat mooring facility is provided at the ramp site for a number of boats equal to 10% of the crr parking spaces at the site for crr parking spaces between 1,501 feet and 2,000 feet. New facilities must meet Federal A.D.A. requirements for handicapped persons. 6. Agency/city reserves the right to make changes in access site plan off-street parking or on-street designated or non-designated parking as public policy priorities may require, with a good faith effort to replace lost crr spaces at the earliest possible date, notifying the LMCD of anticipated changes. LMCD and MN DNR agree to cooperate with city/agency in relocation of lost slips, including locations elsewhere in the lake, and at other access. 7. City retains approval privilege on any actions of an agency regulating parking allowances or restrictions on county or state highways affecting crr parking in the vicinity of an access site. 8. Agency/city agrees to enter into this agreement for a period of years (five years desired) in recognition of the valuable recreational opportunities offered on Lake Minnetonka. Page 19 Appendix 6 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LANDOWNER'S BILL OF RIGHTS State parks, water access sites, wildlife management areas, state forest, fisheries projects, recreational trails, canoe and boating routes, wild and scenic rivers, scientific and natural areas and the State water bank program all provide recreational opportunities for the general public or protection of the State' natural resources. Each of these programs authorizes either the purchase of the fee title to land or the purchase of a lesser interest in land, such as an easement. Selling land to the Department of Natural Resources is in many ways similar to selling it to a private party, but in other ways is different from standard real estate transactions. Because of the many Federal and State laws that govern land acquisition, it often takes eight months to a year and a half to sell land to the Department of Natural Resources. These laws were designed both to protect private landowners' rights and to assure that public money is well spent to serve the public interest. This letter describes the Department of Natural Resources' . land acquisition procedure. Please keep it for future reference. Land Identification The management programs select the tracts of land which they feel would most help them to carry out their programs. Once your land has been identified for purchase, you will be contacted by a Department of Natural Resources representative who will explain what your land would be used for if it is purchased and will also explain the land acquisition to you. You are free to decide whether or not to sell your land to the State. If you are willing to consider selling it, the State will have your land appraised and you will then decide if you want to sell it at the appraised value. If you do not want to sell your land to the State, you are under no obligation to do so. However, you may be contacted again in the future to see if you might have changed your mind. . Appraisal Process The State will hire a qualified appraiser to determine the fair market value of your property. You will be invited to accompany the appraiser during his or her inspection of the property, if you so desire. You also have the right to hire and appraiser to provide an independent opinion of value for your property. You will be notified of the deadline for your appraisal to be submitted if you would like it to be reviewed along with the State's appraisal. After the appraisals are reviewed, a fair market value will be established as just compensation for your property. If your land is purchased by the State, you may be reimbursed up to $500 for the cost of your appraisal providing you submit a copy of that report and a paid receipt for it. It is not necessary for you to submit your appraisal for review in order to be reimbursed for it. Page 20 Landowners Bill of Rights Negotiation Process The State is not allowed to discuss the price until after the appraisal is completed and will not discuss the price with anyone but the landowner or his agent. Documents regarding the purchase of your property will be public records once the purchase is completed. At the beginning of the negotiation period, you will be given a summary of the approved appraisal. This summary will include the final conclusion of value, the total number of acres and types of land appraised, the valuation of all buildings and improvements being purchased, and any special elements of value. The same person who appraised your property for the State will not act as a negotiator for its purchase. Purchase Procedure The Department of Natural Resources will acquire your property by means of an option, which is an offer from the landowner to sell. The option, including all special provisions, legal descriptions and elements of execution, must be reviewed by the State as to its legality and acceptability. The State shall have 15 days after receiving an option to notify the . landowner in writing if the option is not approved and the reasons therefore. If you are not . - notified of an option's disapproval, you should assume it is approved. Unless you request otherwise in writing, the option period shall be no more than two months if no survey is required. If a survey is required, the option period shall be no more than nine months. These time limits do not apply to wildlife management areas that require county board approval. The option period begins on the last date on which the option is signed by a landowner. Before the end of the option period, the State shall decide whether or not to purchase the land and shall notify the landowner of its decision by either a Notice of Election to Purchase or a letter explaining the reasons for not purchasing the property. If the State does not elect to purchase property on which it has approved and accepted an option, it will pay the landowner $500.00 after the option period expires. After signing the option, you have one month to mail or deliver an Abstract of Title to the . Department of Natural Resources. If your land title is registered, you should submit your Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title plus a Registered Property Abstract instead of an Abstract of Title. The State will have the abstract brought up to date at its own expense. Within one month from the Notice of Election to Purchase or delivery of the Abstract,whichever is later, the Attorney General will provide a title opinion which will identify any defects in your title to be cleared up before the purchase can be completed. You will then have 120 days to make your title marketable. The landowner is required to pay all taxes that are due in the year in which the deed or easement is signed, including Green Acres deferred taxes. Once the taxes are paid and all title defects are cured, the Attorney General will send you a Warranty Deed or other conveyance document to sign and return. Page 21 Landowners Bill of Rights The State pays the abstracting and recording fees related to the sale. If your property is held as security for a loan or advance of credit that requires or permits the imposition of a pre- payment penalty, this penalty shall also be reimbursed by the State. The costs of clearing title defects, payment of taxes and related attorney's fees are not reimbursable. Method of Payment Payment for the land is mailed to the landowner after the signed deed or other conveyance document has been recorded and the abstract brought up to date. Depending on the County Recorder's workload, this may take anywhere from two to four weeks. Assuming your title is marketable and you act expeditiously to complete the transaction, payment must be made no later than 90 days after the Notice of Election to Purchase. You may choose to be paid in either a lump sum or in up to four separate payments. The State does not pay interest on monies held during an installment agreement. . Vacating Your Property You have the right to continue occupancy of your property until 90 days after the date of the deed. You may stay an addition 90 days by paying a fair market rent to the State, with the prior written approval of the management program for which your property is being purchased. If you do not vacate your property within 180 days of the date of the deed, you will automatically waive your right to any relocation benefits to which you may otherwise be entitled. Relocation Benefits The State is obligated to pay relocation expense any time they displace owners or tenants from their residences, displace a business or cause a business to cease operating. Moving expenses are the most common relocation benefit. A relocation advisor is assigned to work with anyone who might be displaced by State land acquisition to guide them in locating a new home or business. . Legal Rights You have the right to accept or reject the State's offer for your property. If you accept the offer, you may receive or waive any relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits. You also have the right to accept the State's offer for the property and to contest the relocation benefits. You have the right to seek the advice of any attorney regarding any aspect of your land sale. You also have the right to have the State acquire your land by condemnation at your written request and with the agreement of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. The primary laws governing Department of Natural Resources land acquisition procedures are, Public Law 91-646 and Minnesota Statutes Section 84.0274. For further information, contact: Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Land Acquisition and Exchange Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 30 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4030 (612) 296-4097 Page 22 Appendix 7 LAKE MINNETONKA ACQUISITION PROCESS This document will describe the process the DNR will use to acquire land on Lake Minnetonka. BACKGROUND A Process to provide Public Water Access (PW A) in the metropolitan area was developed by the Metropolitan Council, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR), and the State Planning Agency under the direction of the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR). . These agencies produced a document that outlined a Site Selection Criteria, a Lake Ranking system and an Access Priority List. The MNDNR and other public agencies use these procedures to develop accesses in the metropolitan area. This document is available from the Metropolitan Council. PROCESS On a priority bay or lake area, public property is investigated for access suitability. If none is available or useable, a search for suitable sites is begun. Often on heavily developed lakes or bays, the actual acquisition process begins with a parcel of land becoming available that meets the criteria. The MNDNR purchases only from willing sellers and the owner must be willing to sell the parcel for a public water access. When the landowner indicates a willingness to sell, the acquisition process and timeline are explained. If the landowner agrees to proceed, the Landowner Bill of Rights Letter is signed. This letter verifies that the landowner understands the process and has agreed to work with the MNDNR. . If the site meets the criteria and the landowner agrees to proceed, the MNDNR will have the property appraised to determine its fair market value. After the appraisal has been approved, an offer to purchase can be made. If the landowner agrees with the value, then the MNDNR may take an option on the property. The option will indentify such things as, the land to be purchased, the price, the length of time required to complete the negotiations. After the option is signed by the landowner, the MNDNR, within 5 working days, will notify the city and the LMCD, in writing, of its actions. Notification can not be made prior to the signing of the option due to confidentiality requirements. Page 23 Lake Minnetonka Acquisition Process PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The proposal will be discussed with the city, (citizens, council members, etc) and other interested members of the public. Assuming there are no valid reasons for reglecting the property or the project, the MNDNR will work and cooperate with the city and the LMCD to complete the acquisition and development.. The MNDNR will use various methods to inform and involve the public. The processes used will include: Formal Public Meetings, Informal Public Meetings, Open Houses, Question and Answer Sessions at City Council Meetings and Meetings with neighbors and concerned individuals. The MNDNR will continue to keep the city and the LMCD informed and involved in the . design of the acces from the initial concept stage through final design. Examples of items . . that will be discussed are: traffic flow, parking lot layout, drainage and runoff, landscaping, slgnage. This cooperative process does not end with the construction of the access. After the access is developed the MNDNR will continue to work with the city and the residents on access maintenance and operations procedures. . Page 24 . . Appendix 8 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE ACCESS SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA These evaluation criteria should be used in selecting potential new access sites for fishing craft and small recreation boats. The standard are not expected to be perfectly achieved. Each should be seriously considered and graded. Other evaluation criteria may be considered on a site-specific basis. 1. Relationship to residential areas -- Positive and negative impacts of the site on adjacent residential areas, such as distance between a site and nearby homes, screening the site from homes, noise, traffic, etc. 2. Accessibility to primary highways -- Potential sites near major highways (State Highways 7 and 101, County Roads 19 and 15 are examples) to reduce traffic impact on residential streets. Safety on site, on water and egress to both. Public use precedent -- Sites which are already in public ownership or in commercial or industrial use, or isolated from other residential areas, and where public facilities or services have been provided and accepted, have the least neighborhood impact. 4. Intensity of boating use near a potential access site -- Sections of the lake where there is intense boating, or crowding in channels, should be downgraded. 5. 6. Cost -- Property acquisition, development and maintenance costs. Physical development constraints -- positive and negative features on land and in the water and changes possible to make the potential site usable. 7. Visual impacts -- Positive and negative visual impressions as seen from land and water. Multiple use opportunities for the site -- Sites that provide shore fishing, pier fishing, picnic areas, toilets, etc., along with boat access are preferred. 9. Site size -- Larger sites with off-street parking are preferred. 10. Environmental considerations -- dredging, fill, run-off control, wetlands preservation, etc. Footnotes: 1. Sites shall not be excluded because there is limited access for large boats. 2. Sites will be preferred that provide equitable distribution. 3. Sellers must be willing, city must cooperate and other agencies must approve. Adopted: March 18, 1993 Page 25 w ~ <t -J (J) w z o N co C~ QJ C ~ :> 0 CO C co..... ..... CO .eQJOCOM c.CCN~ QJCO:>-'O QJ....,,... CO 0 O::;::O:::~ N N 0. <( ::E ~ ... . CO . -C C 0\ . >< . ~ :.a 0 C Q) . m Q.. c.. . < . C ,... ~ ~ :>-. CD QJ 0 0 0 CO :> ...., 0 0 cx:l C . CO CI.l ~ ~ 0 .eMC 0 QJ CO . 0. QJ QJ C ,... ~ N QJ U QJ 0 0 C QJX,...,....e 0 OWc:.:JOtf) Eo< UJ .- M UJ ~ - CO C <( . . . . . . . ........ . \0 N Q) 00 ~ ~ .. ......... ~ CO ,... ~ ~CO:>-. C 0 J:l.. CO o -= 0 cx:l ..... U ~ 00 QJCO~OQJCCO CQJCC,....M~ Ccx:l:lOO,...C ...., O"".eo.O ..;1";:;:: ;:;::0tf)tf)E-< ...... - N U CO QJ cx:l CO ~ CO ..... ,... CO ~ CI.l CO .u C 'M 0.. CI.l ~ 0 ,... oM 0 CO ..... ..... 00 ,... 0 ...., QJ QJ~ 0 - ..... ~ ,... C C C C oM QJ~ QJ 0 C C :l 0 ,... C C ,... .u ...., ...., 0 ,... 0. C :l 0 U ;:;:: - ::;:0 tf) ...., O.e...., """ z~ ;:E:;:::UJ::> J lr'i 0 :I . . Apendix 10 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY FOR LAKE MINNETONKA TASK FORCE CHRONOLOGY The initial Task Force meeting was held 3/11/92. Its purpose goal and objectives were introduced as follows: PURPOSE -- to establish a plan to meet the Management Plan lake access policies developed in the 1983 and 1986 Lake Minnetonka Task Force studies. GOAL -- coordination of an immediate inter-agency inventory, study and assessment of the carltrailer (c/t) parking spaces at public access ramps to meet the 700 reliable clt objective. OBJECTIVES: a. Establish criteria in the LMCD Code for acceptable year-round lake access, including access ramps, lakeside and remote clt parking, handicapped access and signage. b. Conduct a joint study of all access ramps and associated clt parking, identifying all existing ramps and associated lake parking. c. Develop a plan for and provide LMCD-approved boat access ramps with 700 reliable clt parking spaces. d. Widen or otherwise improve efficiency of existing ramps for use by more than one clt at a time. e. Resolve DNR's Maxwell Bay access proposal in accord with Management Plan policies and objectives and in accord with the 1983 and 1986 Task Force Study recommendations by: 1) Activating the Lake Access Task Force, appointing representatives of affected communities, DNR, LMLOA and citizens to implement the public access siting process. 2) Facilitate a cooperative effort to address land use issues that are the basis for objections raised by the City of Orono. 3) Conduct a feasibility study of land purchase between Gayle's Marina and the DNR property. 4) City of Orono, LMCD and DNR cooperate in securing funding for the Maxwell Bay access properties. NOTE:After cooperation on obtaining funding through the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR), the Task Force and LMCD were asked by Orono officials to not further participate in Maxwell Bay negotiations between the DNR and the City of Orono. Page 27 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY The Task Force formed three subcommittees, namely: Data Gathering Standards Steering DATA GATHERING SUBCOMMITIEE crr PARKING INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT A 4/15/92 inventory of existing or planned c/t parking spaces was conducted by LMCD and DNR staff from contacts made among city and county staff. That inventory was compared to the 1983 Task Force inventory for the five zones of the lake. The comparison of c/t parking spaces by zones was as follows: Zone Goal 1 North Arm 139 2 Grays Bay Hwy 101 Grays Bay Dam Wayzata Bay Hwy 16 Sub Total 144 1983 Total 1992 Total 60 63 24 37 19 19 -3... 2.5.. 46 81 0 40 79 93 -1l. ..A. 79 97 0 30 0 32 0 100 Q -3.D 0 192 185 473 3 Carsons Bay 155 4 Spring Park Bay Phelps Bay Sub Total 126 5 Halsted, Wms. St. Halsted, Kings Point Henn. Regional Park Cooks Bay, Mount Park Sub Total 136 Grand Total 700 These counts were later revised based upon a more detailed inventory conducted in June by LMCD staff of c/t street parking potentially available to 2,000' from the access, identified later in this report. Criteria were needed to identify reliable c/t parking spaces. The Standards Committee was asked to develop such criteria. Page 28 . .., PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY STANDARDS SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIONS FACILITATOR ENGAGED. The LMCD engaged a state facilitator to meet the diverse interests involved in the proceedings: 1. Decisions would result from a consensus. 2. Persons participating would only be those holding designated membership in the Task Force. 3. The Task Force would work in good faith. TASK ASSIGNMENTS: l. MN DNR staff examined c/t parking spaces in public access ramp lots. 2. LMCD staff counted street parking utilizing 1985 c/t parking criteria, adjusting criteria by extending distance from access site from 1,500' to 2,000'. 3. Aerial photographs of public access sites taken. 4. DNR/LMCD staff drafted parking space standards from the 1986 standards previously considered. . TASK ASSIGNMENT RESULTS: crr PARKING INVENTORY OF 7/15/93. A street inventory of actual and potential c/t parking spaces up to 2,000' from accesses was conducted. Potential spaces included future public access sites, one private lot, public lots in other agency jurisdictions (school districts) and street locations subject to city/county approval. A surveyor wheel measurement device was used to calculate an accurate 50' clt parking space and for determining accurate distance from the launch ramp. Results of the inventory count of 7/15/92 were: crr Parking Spaces at present or planned access ramps: . North Arm Grays Bay 101 Causeway Grays Bay Dam Kings Point, DNR Spring Park Ramp Spring Park/Orono County Lot Hennepin Regional Park Sub Total 63 37 19 32 19 70 100 340 Potential crr Parking Space Additions: Streets, city & county Off street, private & city Sub Total 82 86 168 Existing Street Availability: City/county (99 of the 337 at Williams Street, Halsted Bay access) 337 GRAND TOTAL 845 Page 29 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY DNR ANALYSIS OF crr PARKING SPACES AT ACCESS LOTS: The clt parking space count at access on-site lots differ only slightly from 1983 and 1986 counts. Some car-only parking spaces could be converted to clt parking spaces. AERIAL SURVEY OF PUBLIC ACCESS SITES Aerial photos of clt parking conditions at public access sites on a high-use day illustrated crowded conditions. Opportunities for improvements or expansion of parking capacity either on or off-site were noted. RELIABLE crr PARKING SPACE STANDARDS Seven criteria and three supplemental recommendations applying to Parking Standards were prepared 7/15/92 for Task Force approval. GRANT RECOMMENDATION FOR MAXWELL BAY LAND ACQUISITION . A Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) grant recommendation for $944,000 for land acquisition to develop a public access site on Maxwell bay, subject to Legislative approval, was announced. JOINT DATA GATHERING/STANDARDS SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIONS crr PARKING INVENTORY REVIEW Subcommittee action of 8/12/92 amended the 7/15/92 clt Parking Inventory from 845 to 755 clt parking spaces. A reduction of 59 spaces from 99 to a net of 40 spaces at the Williams St. Halsted Bay access, and a reduction of 32 spaces from 100 to 68 spaces at the Hennepin Regional Park resulted in a 755 adjusted count. PARKING STANDARDS RECOMMENDATION: . Starting with the seven criteria and three supplemental recommendations of 7/15/92, the joint subcommittee review recommended Parking Standards for Task Force consideration and adoption. EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF ACCESS SITES: Equitable distribution of parking sites throughout the five lake zones was identified as a priority. PARKING INVENTORY: With minor footnote adjustments, the Parking Inventory of 755 current and potential clt parking spaces was finalized and recommended for presentation to the Task Force. Page 30 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY STEERING COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations of the Data Gathering and Standards Subcommittee meeting of 9/9/92 was confirmed. Additional issues were recommended for Task Force consideration: 1. Coordinate site acquisition for Maxwell Bay 2. Coordinate access development of Grays Bay Hwy. 101 Causeway and subsequent closing of Grays Bay Dam access 3. Coordinate access development of Hennepin Regional Park 2. The Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Assn. (LMLOA) presented their board position calling for a reduction of the 700 clt parking spaces goal. DNR, LMCD and sport fishing representatives supported the 700 clt parking spaces goal. This goal originated in the 1983 Task Force Study. It is based upon Lake Minnetonka's 14,000 acre capacity to accommodate one boat per 20 acres of water surface. No consensus was reached on changing the goal. Consensus required substantially unanimous agreement. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE ACTIONS Lake Access Task Force actions taken 10/21/93: 1. Parking Standards were adopted. . 3. The LMCD Lake Access Committee, appointed January, 1992, was activated to: a. Coordinate related lake access objectives and policies with the Task Force. b. Carry out lake access objectives and policies in the Management Plan which will not be addressed by the Task Force. LMCD BOARD ACTION ON TASK FORCE POSITIONS . Upon recommendation by the LMCD Lake Access Committee, the LMCD board on 10/28/92 approved Task Force positions on: 1. Parking Standards for Lake Minnetonka Public Accesses 2. Parking Inventory of 755 current and potential clt parking spaces 3. A draft model Parking Agreement for cities or agencies identifying clt parking spaces which meet the Parking Standards. 4. Parking Agreements to be secured by LMCD with cities or agencies. Page 31 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY TASK FORCE ACTIONS Lake Access Task Force actions taken on 12/9/92: 1. Approved Current and Potential CfT Parking Inventory total adjusted to 735 clt parking spaces, subject to meeting adopted Parking Standards, and subject to agreements with cities or agencies within which the existing public accesses are located. (The 8/12192 Parking Inventory was adjusted from 755 to 735 as a result of the Hennepin Regional Park planned access count being adjusted to 80 upon agreement with the City of Minnetrista and Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District.) 2. Goal of 700 clt parking spaces on which Task Force consensus was not reached was referred to the LMCD board for a final decision. 3. All cities encouraged to make a concerted effort to provide their share of lake access clt parking spaces. Cities were further encouraged to coordinate and cooperate to meet zone goals. LMCD LAKE ACCESS COMMITTEE REPORT The Lake Access Committee actions taken on 3/16/93: 1. Committee chair outlined a policy to persuade cities or agencies to make decisions on public accesses in the best interest of the most public use of the lake. 2. Existing public access sites proposed for evaluation against a grading scale as to safety, quality, size. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE ACTIONS Lake Access Task Force Actions taken 3/18/93: 1. Model Public Access CfT Parking Agreement approved incorporating adopted Parking Standards. 2. Access Site Evaluation Criteria ten point outline approved with recommended footnotes approved. 3. Aerial slide photo documentation of existing and potential access sites presented. Sites suggested from this aerial survey are to serve as a future guide for access site inquiries and proposals. Page 32 . . PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY ACCESS SITING SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIONS Access Siting Subcommittee Actions taken 4/6/93: 1. MN DNR Landowner Bill of Rights was reviewed. The Bill of Rights was accepted for recommendation to the Task Force. The procedures detailed in the Bill of Rights would remain in effect after the Task Force completes this study. Public review of a future access site negotiation brought forward by the DNR was concluded to be the affected city's responsibility. 2. A list of some 40 potential access sites taken from the March aerial survey and a list developed by the 1983 Task Force Study was edited to review properties no longer available due to development or other current uses making the property unavailable. SnEmNGCO~EACTIONS Steering Committee actions taken 4/6/93: MN DOT position on its reduced Hwy. 101 causeway bridge and road rebuilding, excluding the causeway public access upgrading, was received. . ACCESS SITING SUBCOMl\flTTEE ACTIONS Access Siting Subcommittee actions taken 4/14/93: 1. Potential public access sites were presented for review against the 1993 ten point Access Site Evaluation Criteria. All marina sites were removed for separate consideration. Eight other sites were removed as no longer available. ACCESS SITING SUBCO~E ACTIONS . Access Siting Subcommittee actions taken 5/4/93: 1. Potential access sites reviewed per Access Site Evaluation Criteria, with added conditions: a. All sites must have willing sellers. b. City cooperation must be secured in advancing the access site. c. Agency cooperation must be secured in advance of a site being selected. 2. Potential access sites remaining on the list as a result of comparison to the review criteria were: * Tonka Bay City Dock, channel to Gideons Bay * Timber Lane, Gideons Bay, Shorewood * Mai Tai, Excelsior Bay * 456 Arlington Ave, Wayzata Bay (private residence) * Pelican Point, Spring Park Bay, Mound * Lost Lake, Cooks Bay, Mound * Advance Machine, West Arm, Spring Park Page 33 PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY 3. Marinas as potential access sites were recommended to be examined for public access use under the following conditions: a. Potential use of extending existing capacity. b. Extent to which the marina already serves the public for fee paid access. c. Attitude of nearby homeowners for public access use. d. Considering any public access use as a temporary trial. e. Management issues to be addressed such as how public parking/launch space would be reserved and accounted for in a mix of fee paid launch servIce f. MN DNR budget constraints in funding leased space LMCD LAKE ACCESS COMMITTEE ACTION Lake Access Committee action taken 5/7/93: 1. The Lake Access Parking Agreement with the City of Minnetrista was accepted and recommended to the LMCD board for acceptance. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE MEETING ACTIONS Lake Access Task Force actions taken 5/12/93: 1. The seven potential access sites were accepted as identified by the Access Siting Subcommittee 5/4/93. . 2. Marina sites having potential to accommodate public access through agreement with the DNR will be considered separately from the seven potential access sites accepted 5/4/93. The six conditions under which marina sites would be evaluated for public access as detailed by the Access Siting Committee 5/4/93 were also accepted. 3. The Maxwell Bay access site is recognized as in negotiations between the City of Orono and MN DNR. LMCD LAKE ACCESS COMMITTEE ACTIONS Lake Access Committee action of 6/15/93 approved tasks which the LMCD committee intends to continue processing: 1. Determine the equitable distribution of public access among existing and potential new access sites. . 2. Evaluate and negotiate with commercial marinas for their potential in providing c/t parking and launch service: a. Apply equitable distribution criteria. b. DNR to negotiate agreements for space/service provided. Page 34 . . PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY, 1992 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE STUDY 3. Assess means by which existing public accesses may be upgraded for safety and greater user satisfaction. 4. Board members to work with LMCD and DNR staff in finalizing cft parking agreements with cities and agencies having existing public accesses. 5. Access signage to be developed per agreement provisions, cities and agencies asked to assist. ### Page 35 \ ! CK NO CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR HAY 9, 1994 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED CHECKS ISSUED SINCE APRIL 25. 1994 13597 13598 13599 13600 13601 13602 13603 13604 13605 13606 13607 13608 A 13609 .~13610 13611 13612 13613 13614 13615 13616 13617 13618 13619 13620 13621 13622 13623 13624 13625 .~~~3626 .. 13627 13628 13629 13630 13631 13632 13633 13634 13635 Wendy L. Davis Donald Drazil US Postmaster MN Dept. of Revenue MN Dept. of Revenue Internal Revenue Servo ICMA Retirement Trust City County Credit Union AFSCME Local #224 Child Support Enforcement Anoka cty Support/Collect Craguns Conference Ctr Wendy Davis Govt. Training Service Govt. Training Service Bradley Nielsen Joseph Pazandak Void First State Bank Commissioner of Revenue Steven Evans Minnegasco Theresa Naab Northern States Power US West Warren McCurdy Bellboy corporation copier Alternatives Day Distributing Griggs, Cooper & Company Honeywell Protection Servo Hoops Trucking Johnson Bros Liquor Co. MN Bar Supply, Inc. Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine & Spirits Co. Ryan Properties, Inc. Weekly News, Inc. The Wine Company PURPOSE Sec 125 reimb/mileage Sec 125 reimb/dinner reimb Water cards postage Feb. sales tax Mar. sales tax Bal Fed/Fica/Med 941 Rpt Payroll deductions Payroll deductions payroll deductions Payroll deductions payroll deductions Conference Exp-Hurm Sec 125 reimb Conf regist - Hurm Conf regist - Pazandak Sec 125 reimb Mileage/batteries/calc Payroll withholding Payroll withholding Recycling award April gas util Mileage April elec util Telephone/advertising Return of Escrow Liquor Copier maint contract Beer, misc. Liquor, wine, misc. Alarm monitoring Liquor & wine delivery Liquor, wine, beer, misc. Misc., supplies Liquor, wine Liquor, wine, misc. May rent Advertising Wine TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED -1- AMOUNT 96.98 381. 24 208.67 4,126.00 4,485.00 122.23 621.57 483.00 119.10 92.50 167.33 34.30 140.00 160.00 25.00 100.00 104.02 5,402.55 878.26 175.00 935.18 7.25 2,020.66 200.52 500.00 2,867.97 30.00 1,724.75 3,827.00 96.25 189.60 1,845.79 149.17 936.71 1,638.48 2,410.63 112.00 75.00 37,489.71 . CITY OF SHORE WOOD Ci..IECK {.4PPf.i'O"'/:~lL L TSTING FOR MAY 9. 1994 MEETING CHECK~ VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT 13661 METRO WASTE CONTROL. COMM_ MAY SEWER CHARGE 1:5f.,f,2 r'.iFTFW I/JASTF CONTROL COl'iM.. (~PRTL SAC CHARGES 13663 MID CON SYSTEMS INC HAND CLE(~NER 13664 CELLULAR TELFPHON CO CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 1. ~~.~)~).5 ~1~'~ l.JC Fl.Jr.~r.) UNFt1P COt1P - S. NTCCUt1 13666 NORTHERN STATES POWER STf=<FET LIGHT UTH.ITTES 1IIIIIiIt.;.".: (. .7 ..)UI.:' NORTHERN STATES POWER APRIl.. EL.EC UTILITES APRTL FLEC UTH. ITES APf;'TL ELEC UTn. ITES APRIL FLEC UTH. TTES (:4PRTL ELEe UTH. ITES APRIL FLEC UTTLTTES APRIL EL.EC UTILITFS *** TOTAl. FOR NORTHERN STATES FlOWE 13668 PEPSI COL.A COMPANY POP FOR r1~lCHrNE 13669 PRECISION COMPUTER SYSTEM USER GROUP MTG - W DAVIS FINANCE 1:':'670 f-\'TVFR VALLEY (-4UTO P~,FHS PLOi,lJ REP(~lTR 13f.,71 SO LK 11TKA PUB SAFETV DEP t11~R 800K ING FEES _f,Y? SOUTi-l~lr1 BUSINESS Cm1t1. 1367?; TERt1H~AL SUPPLY COMP{.4NV AD FOR BIOS - SILVERWD MAINT SUPPLIES l:~674 TH1E S{.WER OFF SITE SEe PLANNTi'W MINUTES COUNCIL 11HHJTES *** TOTAL. FOR TIME SAVER OFF SITE 13675 TONKA BAY-CI.fY OF 1ST QTR WATER/SEWER CHG 1ST QTR WATER/SEWER CHG *** TOTAL FOR TONKA BAY-CITY OF 13676 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 13677 TWIN CITY WATER TESTING \lJ(~TER TESTING 13678 VESSCO. INC. \lJFt. L RFP?) T F~ 13679 WAGERS. INC_ TYPF~Jf-\'ITER PURCH 13680 WMY SVCS OF MINNESOTA 1/.J{.~srE r.~FMOVAL. 13681 lIEGI.ER. INC. EQUIPMENT REP~4IR -3- SEI/JER DE SEWER DE 34.570.91 3,960.00 CITY G{.~R PLANi',!ING Ti~AF CON MUN BLDG CITY G~4R TRAF CON PARKS & ItJl~TFF\l DE I/JATEr:;~ OF SEI"JER DE 1 . 3~<;9 . 3,1::, MUN F.;LDG pun I,IJI{S POLICE P PRO,JECrS CITY GAR 49.10 48.81 ~3 . 7613 . 00 "27 :? ~~,4 _ ~361 291 .. 12 214.14 123 JJ9 49_94 2'=:.9 .. :<~8 2;:;. O. f,9 1E)0.99 89.50 65.00 ?~~; .. f,7 208.24 163. ?;O QJ ......4. l:-') ., ._ .,~: PLANNING 84.75 GEN GOVT 161.25 74t.,.00 WATER DE 257.76 SEWER OF 173.40 431.16 CrTY GAR \I.){.HER DE "'.J(:~TFFi' DE r1Ui'~ BL Oct PUB I;.,IKS 49.00 20..00 170.87 431':,.51 163..00 65~<; .. 50 ~ PERIOD END DATE 05/01/94 ****FflE UPOATEO**** PAGE SYSTEM DATE 04130/94 PAYROLL C H E C K REGISTER 'ECX CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK fYPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT 0 5 01 94 125 BRUCE E. BENSON 208325 184.70 0 5 01 94 200 BARBARA J. BRANCEl 208326 233.87 0 5 01 94 4S0 ROBERT B. DAUGHERTY 208327 184.70 0 5 01 94 2650 DANIEL R. lEWIS 208328 184.70 0 5 01 94 4500 KRIST! STOVER 208329 184.70 UUTOTALSUU 972.67 . . -5- _PFRIOD END DATE 04/,)0/94 i***FILE UPDATED**i* PAGE SYSTEM DATE 05/04/94 PAYROLL C H E C K REGISTER ECK CHECK EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK dPE DATE NUMBER NUMBER 1i110UNT 0 5 03 94 500 CHARLES S. DAVIS 208.H4 587.28 0 5 03 94 600 WENDY L. DAVIS 208335 824.26 0 5 03 94 1001 JOHN M. FRUTH 208336 31. 03 0 5 03 94 1400 PATRICIA R. HELGESEN 208337 639.41 0 5 03 94 1550 JAMES C. HURM 208338 1512.66 0 5 03 94 1800 DENNIS D. JOHNSON 208339 742.91 0 5 03 94 1940 LOREN A. JONES 208340 47.89 0 5 03 94 1950 MARTIN L. JONES 208341 83.44 0 5 03 94 2100 WILLIAM F. JOSEPHSON 208342 505.99 0 5 03 94 2210 SANDRA L. KLOMPS 208343 42.85 0 5 03 94 2500 SUSAN M. LATTERNER 208344 22.56 0 5 03 94 2700 COLLEEN L. IINOSKOOG 208345 174. 03 0 5 03 94 2800 JOSEPH P. LUGOIlSKI 208346 764.40 0 5 03 94 2900 RUSSELL R. MARRON 208347 62.03 0 5 03 94 2910 HEIDI M. HAY 208348 42.29 . 5 03 94 3000 THERESA L. HAAS 708349 594.70 5 03 94 3100 LAWRENCE A. NICCUM 208350 844.23 0 5 03 94 3400 BRADLEY J. NIELSEN 208351 1030.87 0 5 03 94 3500 JOSEPH E. PAlANOAK 208352 1066.30 0 5 03 94 3600 DANIEL J. RANDALL 208353 805.38 0 5 03 94 3701 BRIAN M. ROERICK 208354 47.29 0 5 03 94 3800 ALAN J. ROLEK 208355 1262.12 0 5 03 94 3851 BRIAN C. ROSENBERGER 208356 129.25 0 5 03 94 3900 CHRISTOPHER E. SCHMID 208357 401. 06 0 5 03 94 4600 BEVERLY J. VON FELDT 208358 625.92 0 5 03 94 4750 RALPH A. WEHl E 208359 570.91 0 5 03 94 4900 DEAN H. YOUNG 208360 640. 97 0 5 03 94 5000 DONALD E. lDRAZIL 208361 tl1l7.93 . U**TOTAlS**U TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR 15289.96 13275.60. 2014.36 -6- !>- ~ !'> ..... . g,g:i3l;l ~~~"r1 ~ 'TI ~ :::s S ~ QOtx1 tx1 ~ ' P. !:t. o' 8 0. 0' Ul .1:1' ~ Ul l>> ~ n 0 a ~ i3~~ ~ tj C1l e: 1~~' ~ Ul ..... 0. a.~:::s ~ ~ .~ fd (') a ~ t-i Ul j)l Oq .g Ul' () g 1=:.' .. 0 i :1 n l"r ~R~g ::goe: ~. () ~. g' ~ g. [ z . . g ~ 0' .a ~ ~.m ~ O'~ ~g'8 9 . . c g . . . Jo1 .2 ~ 1=:.' '"g 0' d g.:::s .~ . ~ .. h Ul ~ CJq ~O'sl-t) i!gg.~ ~:,~ Ul ij. n ~ 3 ~. ? ~. g. g .g g.aUl ~~~ <b [ ~ '" ~ a ~ :::s o ~ a~i3~ .J:>- ..... ~. ~gr ~ '"g 2 (') ~ Ul .g ~. g~~~ ~ lU td ::J Ul 0 r ~ 0 Ul s:.g g. .g ~ R Ib' ~ .a e ~. r ......CIJ n - ::s a 0. g' g. [ B-o::S ~ e: ~ . UlCJq ] <: ~ 0 0 [ 31 \, :1 ::s a 0 I-t) P. CJq .gUlg. ~a~!, .g ~. 1-1 ~.~ g- :1 ..... :::s g 0. ~ (') Sg 2- CJq 'U1 c: 0' g ~ 2 0 ~. ti 0 ;; ~ ..... Q ..... en ::J ~ '< ~.~.i3 ~.['~ \0 ~ U1 rn fit ~ ~ ~~ ~. ..... ~ !:t. rn ~ ~ ('). 'f rn S' g' ~~. g ~ rn~ ~. g.~g. ~. :::1 3 0 ........ ~ i3 ~. ::J :-" CJq ~ ..... 5' o s:~ rn i3 ~ r- !l' g i if l-t)B-rn~ c:: ..... (') ~ r rn ~O Ib a:O:::s a.'8 ~. ~ .~. :>l- e [ g. ftrn ~ <b t::': o '< ~ .g. a...... fi .... ~ ~ s R ? ~ 5' :::s ~~o. Jo1 . E~() ::J' ~ '< ~ ~ ~ ~ !:t. eg~ 'TI f ::J F ~ CJq c::YJ(') fi 2 1=:.' g <b ~ ~ !:t. P altIil-4 8 ~ ~ 0 Jo1 P- O' ~ g if I-t) ~ ~ ::0 H ::J o<g .~ rn jl~~g, '-' :>I- ~. . ~ Ib B- 0' ~~g. . g.O'. 8- ",' '< ~a~s- ~ ~ ~ rn . C1l .... s Et 0 ..... ~~~(') Qi .~O c: C1l o rn n io~ Ul 0 ~.g s s- rn g. '< H l ~ :::s ~ ~ 0 0. rn t::': n n a rn' rn I-t) ~ oq ~ rn' ft e: e- n ,0 rn sO'g. ~ ~. [ Ornttl'1 a.~ g g.O N "0 . 0' ~~ ~C1l ~t::': :::s ~ ..... .rn n ~ ~ rr( g. 'd srnO' R~ ~I ~ ~CJq~ it) a ~CJq o-p.n f? . / :::s .''"1 e- ~ ~ 0 o !l' C1l !:t:Oq ~ rne. ~ ~ ~.[ ~n z g~~ m ~ (')0 rn Ji!fta..... 0 ~8 -I [O'n n:::S 0 .fj ~. )> C1l (; ~. tf i3 ~.~ ~ ft~ U1 . 0..... 0 ~ ,-,:::s 0' :::s . rn ~ ca '"1 ~. f? 0. 0 w o :::s .... . ..... ssg; / m - ~ tffl I-t)~ co . :::s '< go. 'M ~ ..... . en .... !:::! m ]) "'" ...... 21?&X m f' fa 'iii. t:J ::. (1 ~ w m..~l:!.OCT~ r-l w !! !;'!l ~ ~ ~)> (J) 13~"OO ~-< :J _.;:l ~. 010 ..-<..,r 10]) ~ Pi v > .... CI.l 5 .d ~ e 0\ a-~; 8~~ .. e-.@ cu.... ~u~ .... e- Ja .... ..... CIS U .... .Ii rJ ]t~l : ~~d~ i .9cad'fi D :fur ~ ~8~;J cu .S CIS .1 g .~ a~(;~ 5 e tt=i 't:J ~ ii Ja j .~.~ ~ Bc:lt='~ 8 .Cl:I 't:J 8 0 UO &~ 6:a . eCl.l8=,.~ ~ c:ltu~ P1Q ~;g 0 cd a ~ t;;0&~~8 8 8 .. e -0 8 'il cu~v>v -a oS 0 'i1 .S oS . 8 ~::ll~~ 8 ~-soSca:l .... .g 0 .... = 0 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ': ft 8tt=ioS'[~ .~ ~ CI.l .~'I::' J;j v .d...... ......:8 :s: ::J oS ~- ~ ~ D ~ 8 . ~.~ .9... .S '... ~ cu ~ ] '4-4 'a e >=8 ... ~ 'f;! .g. S . :::I ~ ~ j :a'cu ~.~ CIS .g e ~ a 't:J 't:J .~ P1 a-.a'~ ~ ~ bi) a ~ 8 . ~ ~.~ . .~ i' e 'fi ~ I i] ~ ~ a ~ ~ Ii ~ o ~ ... J u ~ ! 1 z ~ cu CI.l ~ P .~ . ~ e ] j ~ I CI.l 2 .~ ~ .i ~ 't:J ~ ~. P 't:J ~ I. e II ... ~ o rJ '.1:2 r;1 ~ .~ =' Jbi) .8 8 o Pi U. ~ 'B 0 CI.l bi) 'S: .13 e ~ ... .5 o ...... I CI.l CI.l ~ .:a ! ~ ~ e- '0 :0 = 6 u ~ 8 .~ CI.l 's 8 8 CIS g .'t:J = 8 ,..... 00 .9 ~ CI.l ~ 1 CI.l bi) .s H 8 '8 o 13 o ~ '0 = ~ o rJ .~ 1:1 ~ >> .0 ~ .~ e .9 y .~ a ~ 'S .~ .~ D o El ~ ~ .Q ..... =' - P1 a- = 0 g. u l ..0 ~ .9 CI.l = :~ e f 't:J ~ bO~ .~ ~ ..c;u ~B' .g:.=t ;1 ,g~ CI.l .~. :a i v 5 ..... ca '~i ~ o CI.l ..... CI.l... v..... '1:1 v . : .~o ... CI.l >.U 'il't:J ~~. ~evl 000\ 8 tt=i 0\ v_ .... ..0 bi) o 't:J I:l ... = '1:: gNP1 O=CI) bi) ;s'~ .~ o cu El ..c: 't:J . tib S ~ cu ].~~ =~~ ;seQ 6 P1 ~ ~ bi) .... e-'i 't:J .... 0 -a u~8 v~ oSCI.l8 ~ bi)'.1:2 g'~ ~ ~ ..c: a CI.l (.) 8 '::l ~ -::1.gtj 't:J P1 ~ 8....~ >>5U II) 8 cu .oCl.loS c:: CI.l uv~ ~~'t3 .s .~ .e. P1 cu -s :a .d =' .0 'd CI.l ..... :>,.;s .tf g Uo .s.~ ~~ 5E >~ ~ ~. ~ >... >.~ o CIS j[ . ... C"I ~~ ~CI.l '0 CI.l cu 8 .~ :a 5 ~J .9] !l~ !~ 11>>. u~~ ss.... CI.l g. e ~~tS g, oS .8 S'll~'i ~ .~~ ~ '.. g. P1 'B oS ~ v't:Js' .~ r;: 'g 'v ~ * 't:J.o ~ e o d ~ .... .S & ~ ~ .... ~ -s ~ .l ~ bi)8 .a ~ 8~ .a C::'s cu u ~~ ....... Ou _ CI.l ~u 't:J.o ~;s .. 6 ~-5i ~ CI.l .a "8 8~ (f')u -:f . :0 . a Vbi)>> ~.~ 8 ~-:,.s v5~ .06... .9~~ 'BCI.lt;;t ~~.8 .13 '10 CI.l .... V U ~c1S~ CI.lg~ J!CI.l ~~ ~G1>> '::J bi) ~ a S'~ 6~ u...... ~ o bO CIS [ ~ cu bQ tt .r .d i CI.l M ~ ca 'i N v -so CI.l gbi) ....13 ~~ 5 6 ~.g .a~ :a~ ~:s (.) ...~ ll.g 'BP1 v~ 6..c; v ~~ * .:; v- v !3C1.l~ ~ ~ v l:04~o 8Q3~ ..... 0 "'"'::l r-c.....~ u (.) ..... CJ tl6/tlUl SlX'H:::>lV'~:::>S . I 3v.JOH 3nlV' A exxroog$ 3v.JOH 3nWA 000'00f;$ 3v.JOH 3nw A OOO'ool$ 3v.JOH 3nlV'A OOO'ooL$ %00 %(( %OL 3NON %Ol Ill....,. ::::::~::: .. 1'71..... W IIIB !:)VdWI XV! A1~3dO~d ~~ 0$ ool$ 00l$ -< ~ oof;$ ~ ~ -u ootl$ f) --f ".... o o 009$ , s;: ;v en '--' 009$ ooL$ ooB$ en (J'I ..... Z:<=iln m m ::t: ~ ~ Z c >m ~Or-en .... :i: :i: 0 -<"I1"11en m .... m .... > ~enc3: =< z =< z =< m .... m .... m ~ P':J:Zm Z -< ~ -< ~ -< m .....OOZ 0 m ....................- -< m ......---- -< m -----'...... -< ~ :8;oZ~ > ~~~~8 m .... > ~~~~8 m .... > ~~~~8 m :i: .... > m > m > .c..mG) m ;Q ;Q ;Q !J! .... '" 0 '" 0 '" m =E-t-t .... .... z 0 .... 0 .... 0 ~ .... OOm > 0 > 0 > ~ O;o~ r- ~ r- :::.t r- CI) 0 > Om' 0 0 > 0'3: ." ." .... .... Z c- ::t: ::t: c i=1n m m E Oen ~~2 0 0 01:1oo0 0 0 0 CI) ~ > 00 ~5O .... r- -<z (J) <J> (J) (J) (J) CI) 0 (J) (J) <J> <J> <J> ~ 0 <J> <J> (J) <J> (J) CI) '" ~O~ ~~~~~ .... ~~~~~ ~~~~~ .... 0 men ElElElElEl 2~ ." ElElElElEl ~> .... ElElElElEl 2~ >-t U>)>;O r- r- C ;0 ;0 ....r-m 88888 0 88888 .=iiI 0 88888 .... Oc m :r:-nZ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI) )>c-l 00000 00000 00000 -<Q '-lZ~ r- r- Om (0)> '" '" 1n0 OU>'-l 0 0 Czm > > r-m)> C C om- 00 l])m-n (J) <J> (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) moc ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 l])-IZ :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J ~~ :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J ~~ :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J ~~ ~oo :g:g:g:g:g "-J"-J"-J"-J"-J "-J"-J"-J"-J"-J !:i-nz 0 :8:8:8:8:8 0 :8:8:8:8:8 0 @z(j) -:i: -~ -~ (J))>)> CI) CI) CI) .....Z< > > > c.>O)> '" '" '" C11m- 0 0 0 ~.....s: c c c 00l]) ov.... oviTt ov.... O()l!r- (J) (J) (J) <J> <J> ",m <J> (J) (J) <J> (J) 3(1) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) ",m -10m i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J OCl) i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J OCl) "-J "-J "-J "-J "-J .... "-J "-J "-J "-J "-J .... "-J "-J "-J "-J "-J .... -n :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J m :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J m :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J m ""0 ~~~~~ n ~~~~~ n ~~~~~ n ;0 0 ~ ~ ~ L m 0 -I 00000 ~~ 00000 ~~ 00000 ~~ c..,c..,c..,c..,c.., c.>- c..,c..,c..,c..,c.., c.>- c..,c..,c..,c..,c.., c.>- -0-0-0-0-0 -In -0-0-0-0-0 -In -0-0-0-0-0 -In CI) CI) CI) :Q:~~ 5~~ > ~ > ~ ~ OZm (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) m (J) (J) (J) (J) <J> m m )>m~ .c...c...c...c...c.. ~ i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J ~ ~ r-~~ :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J !->!->!->!->!-> (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) ~r-m ~c.>c.>~c.> ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ 00000 ~~ i'JRlRli'JRl m m m m~~ Z Z Z .... .... .... ~ZU> ~ ~ ..... ~O(j) ~ m)>m ~~~ u>O;O (j)c~ > > > mZ z-Io ~~~~~ ~~ "",......,........,........ ~~ '(il'(/).'(I)~'(/). ~ ~~@ .c..m (J) (J) <J> (J) (J) .c..m ~~~i'Ji'J ~m :.0:;0:.0:.0:.0 '";'~ ~~~~~ '";'~ :-J:-J:-J:-J:-J -~ ~rD;o ~~~~~ ----- "-J"-J"-J"-J"-J I . ~ov --......-- ~ov 'i3ov m~)> i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J ~O ())())())())()) ~O ~~~~~ o;O'-l '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' -0 mm 0 0 0 OU> -n:r: r- r- r- OO ;o:E .c..Z 0 -< m ~ 0 -< 0 (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) <J> <J> (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) r- 0 0 m ~~~~~ 0 88888 ~~~~~ f'Jf'Jf'Jf'Jf'J &l~ &l~ &l~ "-J "-J "-J "-J "-J ~~~~~ ~:H:~ ~ ~ ~ g:g:g:g:g: ~ ~ "-J "-J "-J "-J "-J ~ Si ~ ~r- ~E ~E ~ enO <J> (J) (J) (J) (J) mo (J) <J> <J> (J) <J> mo mo U> ----..... ~> ~~~~~ ~> ~> -I ~~~~~ ~~r- ~~r- (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) ~~r- :r: ggggg 00000 ~ 00000 -m'" -m'" -m'" ())())CX>CX>CX> zO zO zO 0 i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J ....c ~s ~s CI) .... 0 .....m .....m .....m C ~en ~en ~en r- 0 l]) m l]) C ~ ov ov ov (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) '" <J> (J) (J) (J) (J) '" <J> (J) (J) (J) (J) '" @ ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 (J) ppppp .... ppppp .... ppppp .... ..... m m m ..... @@.c...c...c.. n @@@@@ n @@@@@ n 01 @@@ - ~ ~ ~ -n 0 0 -I 00000 ~~~~~ 'Q~ -In en 00000 ~~~~~ ~ "1;:: -m en 00000 ~~~~~ 'Q~ -..,~ en P' --................ ~.... 0- ............................ ~.... 0- ............-.......... ~o _0 _0 ~ i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.> In> ~ i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.> In> ~ i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.>i\.> In> CX>CX>())())CX> ())CX>())())()) CX>())())())()) enr- enr- Cl)r- .... .... .... O~ 9~ 9~ ""0 i'J i'J i'J i'J i'J i'J >0 i'J i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J >0 i'J i'Ji'Ji'Ji'Ji'J >0 0 0. ~~~~~ r- .... ~ ~~~~~ r- ." ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ r- .... <0 c.> ()l!()l!()l!()l!()l! ~o ()l!()l!()l!i)l!()l! ~o ~()l!~()l!()l! ~o <ll ()l! ~~ ()l! ~~ ~~ 0 ~ en en en - c.> ~ ;0 X {j; .." li) Z~==iu; CII m m ~ ~ c >m ~O.-(I) 3: 3: -<.".,,(1) ." m ." m "'(I)c:3: <: z <: z m -4 m -t P'::I:Zm z -< -< ~ -< -< ~ ....O~~ 0 m --- --- --' --' --' m ...............--'" ~XJZ~ > ~~~~~ m -4 > ~~~~~ m -4 > m > l>>m(i) m ;10 '-Io-01l>>(.o) 0 ;10 0 !'! -4 ;10 -4 ;10 :E-t-4 0 ." 0 'TI ): (1l ): ~ OOm 0 ~ o;oc5i r- ~ r- al! 0 0 Om. 'TI 'TI ~3: -4 -4 c:- X X - .- ,... m m m 0(1) ~~2 0 0 ~o 0 0 CII ~ 00 ~5() -4 ;:iz <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ~ 0 <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ~ 0 ~()~ "''''''''''''' 'TI "''''''''''''' 'TI >~ Ul)>;o ~~~~~ -=~ ... ~~~~~ ,......> r- XJXJ -l,m 88888 ~m 0 88888 ~;;t 0 oC: I"Z ~ 0 ~ 0 , )>c-l 00000 > 00000 > -<Q I -lZ~ r- ... Om i ()O)> ;10 ;10 ;;;0 \ OUl-l 0 0 czm > > ,m)> 0 0 om- 00 , CDm" <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> , moc "''''''''''''' 0 "''''''''''''' 0 i CD-lZ :--J:--J:--J:--J:--J ~~ :--J:--J:--J:--J:--J ~~ S;oo '-1'-1'-1'-1'-1 '-1'-1'-1'-1'-1 !:i"z ~~~~~ ;. ~~~~~ ;. I @z(j) ~3: ~;:: , i <J>)>)> CII !: I, ....z< > I ~())> ;10 ;10 " _m- 0 0 "....); c c O~CD ",-4 ",-4 o ' <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ;10m <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ;10m I -lom "''''''''''''' OCII "''''''''''''' OCII ! '-1'-1'-1'-1'-1 Co. '-1'-1'-1'-1'-1 Co. , " :--J:--J:--J:--J:--J m :--J:--J:--J:--J:--J m "1J ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 I ;0 -4 -4 0 ~ ~ I '- \ m () -l I I 00000 ,......;:: 00000 ,......;:: I c..d..d..,c,,, i:..> (.0)- i:..>i:..>i:..>i:..>i:..> (.0)- I -0-0-0-0-0 ~In -0-0-0-0-0 ~In CII CII ~:Qj~ \ i 5(j))> ~ > I ()~~ <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ~ I )>mrn .....--.......... m <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> m ~; ---" --' --' --' --' ,......~ '-1'-1'-1'-1'-1 ~ ,;oUl fXl ?qxq)) fXl fXlfXlfXlfXlfXl 'I )>)>~ ~3: -0-0-0-0-0 ~;:: II Ul'm l>>l>>l>>~B m ~~~~~ m ~~~ ~~~ l>> Z z l' -4 -4 i ~ZUl ~ ..... ~o(j) ~ m)>m ~~~ UlO;o r: (j)c~ > > mZm ,......~ ~ z-lo <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> Ii ~til@ ~~~~~ l>>m ~~~~~ 'j;;:m ~f1);o -:~ .. .. ... .. ... -:~ II g;~g;~B --'---'-..... mS;)> 1\3'" (.0)(.0)(.0)(.0)(.0) 1\3'" 01 01 c.n '-1..........'-1..... " O;O-l ~o ~O Ii mm 0 0 " OUl ... ... I' "I 1\ 00 ;o~ I, l>>Z 0 " -< m ~ () -< () <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> <J>' <J> <J> <J> , 0 m --' --' --' --' --' 0 (.0)(.0)(.0)(.0)(.0) ......................... $~ ~~~~~ $~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ .......................... ~ (.0)(.0)(.0)(.0)(.0) ~ c.nc.nc.nc.nc.n :9 ~ >... ~... ~O ClIO hi <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> mo <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> mo Ul "''''''''''''' ~> --' --' ..- ........... ~> -l '-1.....'-1.......... ~~~~~ I ppppp 23:;;; ~;::... ~ "''''''''''''' --......-- ~m;lO ~~~~~ mo ~~~~~ zO ~c () en -4 ~S 0 .....m .....m C ~en ~CII , 0 CD m CD C ~ ", ", <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ;10 <J> <J> <J> <J> <J> ;10 @ ~~~~~ 0 ~~~~~ 0 <J> Co. Co. .... ppppp m ppppp m ~ BBBBB 0 BBBBB 0 c.n -4 -4 - ())())())())()) ~ ())())())())()) ..... " ~ 0 0 -l 00000 !8!8!8!8!8 ;:: ~;:: ~m en 00000 !8!8!8!8!8 ~~ .....;;; CII 0- --' ..... --' __ -..II 3:-4 0- ......--'---'...... ;::-4 _0 _0 ~ tv tv tv tv tv ... -4 ~ tv tv tv tv tv In): ())())())())()) m> ())())())())()) en... CIIr- -4 -4 "''''''''''''' g~ "''''''''''''' g~ "1J '" >0 '" >0 0 ~ ~~~~~ ... 'TI c.n ~~~~~ ... 'TI (Q ~~~~~ ;::0 (.0) ~~*~~ ;::0 <l> ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '" 0 ~ en CII - (.0) ~ ;0 X Vi ~ x ~ m <") ~ <( - ~~ ~~ 0 <") ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ql O::E ~ {)~ ~~~~~ <") 0> u. ... l1)LOLOUlIO u. ... rolOu;lOlO U) 0 0< NNNNN N 0< NNNNN N 0.. ~O ~O .... .... "'en "'en 0 <W CO CO CO CO CO 0 <W CO CO CO CO CO .... ... C'!C'!C'!C'!C'! .;t .... ... C'!C'!C'!C'!C'! .;t 0- ----- .0 0- -,.....,.....-- .0 ....::E ....::E en ~E ::E ~~~~~ ddddd en w~ :::!t:::. ::E ~~~~~ ddddd I- 0 e e 0 LI.. ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ...... 0 0 U) ~ w ddddd w ddddd ~ .... .... (f} 0 til)til)til)til)til) 0 til)til)til)til)til) @J IX (f) (f} (f} (f} (f} IX (f) (f} (f} (f} (f} ~ 0.. 0.. 5 co W co 0 -' en0 U)0 ::> W- W- 0 Sf!! ....en 0 ~~~~~ ;:).... ~~~~~ < OZ OZ IXw~ ----- IXw~ ----- ...::E:2. ggggg ...::E:2. ggggg I I- ~m ----- ~m ----- (/) (f} (f} (f} (f} (f) (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} ~ Oen Oen ~ ...~ ...en < E , I e ;::;::::;::;::::;:: E 00000 I ~@: 00000 ~@: r:::t::;::::;::::;:::: a) a) a) a) a) ddddd i {) CO CO CO CO CO {) .;t.;t.;t.;t.;t W cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry -' 1 (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f) (f} (f} (f} 0 I >- 0 . 0:: I <( W I >- \ 0 Z.;t \ 30:: 00 ... ILl.. ... (/)0 0 0 wWo OR &'&'&'&'&' o~ ;g;g;g;g;g <Q;w 0.._ o..~ o::~< ~~ " " " " " ~;.. ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: ~~~~~ @Jwo:: NNNNN w~ ----- o::w w_ (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} Ol-Z ~ '-" '-' '-' '-' '-' ~ \:!:!zw < < <(::>0 0::0(/) w:2Z rt<(w E E 00:2 (/)z~ .... .... Z::>W Z Z NNNNN LI..(/) w w ~~~~~ w-,~ ::E~ 00000 ::E~ :2<(-, ~ (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} ~ ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: ~ffi<( .;t.;t.;t.;t.;t w w (f) (f} (f} (f} (f} wZO ~ ~ ~wO < <(0-, ~ro:o --- en 0-0-0-0-0- en 0-0-0-0-0- w~ w....... ...<") <") cry <") <") <") "'cry cry cry cry cry cry ~- ddddd ~- ddddd I- 0 w E E -, S:S:S:S:S: s:s:s:s:s: 0 0 0 0:: 0.. w ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: w ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: LI.. .... " " " " " .... " " " " " wOI- enO NNNNN cn~ NNNNN ~~ (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} <h (J). (J) (/) <h -'~O en~o.. ~~f2 en;:) ~;:) ~O ;:)0 -w;o ;:)IX OIX <(0<") 0< IX< >z~ IX en ...en <(<((f) <::E~ <::E_ 0~@J o e &&&&& o - &&&&& ZLl..t- 9 ~~ " " " " " o ~~ " " " " " -O;.J ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: ... ~ ,...:,...:,...:,...:,...: 01-5 z 0 NNNNN Z {) NNNNN ~Oco (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} 0 (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} Ll..w:i: 0 .... Q@o .... z z <(w-' w wZ::> w ::E e~ ::E <(/)0 en 00 wO ~ en w li;zt- 1->- w E ~ E 1-::><( ~ 00000 00000 go 88888 < 88888 ZLLI ~~ ~~ w-'I- 0:0: ~ ggggg ~ ggggg o::<((/) m< <(- <") <(- o::o~ .., Iii NNNNN .., Iii NNNNN ::>0- z~ .., (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} en (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} 0-,:2 00 en w w .... C:Bf2 o~ .... ;:) ;:) 0 (/)e 0 IX w.... IX < .... - <( ......::> en ~co en ::E .we ::E z (/)01:0 Z ... ... ~ 0 ~ >00 0 .... WI- .... 0 z 0 ~~?: z IX .... w IX .... en w <( &&&~& IX ::E <( &&&~& IX w zW"<f ::E <( <( .... w en w 0 ~a~~ en >- ----- w en >- ----- w en >- w >- Z w en w wz:J:tri ~ w en . > <( > ~::>CI)N u:: ~ u:: ~u.u.>- 0 ....o~ 0 w<~::> z C'I ~I-_z X X t: t: