Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
052493 CC Reg AgP
l • Sc u,, CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MONDAY, MAY 24, 1993 Following the Adjournment of the Board of Review Following the adjournment of the regular meeting the City Council will convene to Executive Session AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Pledge of Allegiance • B. Roll Call Stover Daugherty Lewis Mayor Brancel Benson C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - May 10, 1993 (Att.No.2A- Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Items on Consent Agenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution to Approve License Refuse Hauler - David Hayes, WTI Waste Technology Inc. (Att.No.3A- Proposed Resolution, Application) B. A Motion Approving Donation of $1,000 to 1993 4th of July Celebration as Budgeted (Att.No.3B- Chamber of Commerce Letter) C. Appeal Notice to Remove Appellant: Fleet Mortgage Location: 23155 Acadamy Ave. (Att.No.3C- Appeal Letter) D. Right -of -Way Permit Applicant: Randall McDaniel Location: Gardendale Road (Att.No.3D- Planner's Report) E. AM- Adopt a Resolution to Assess Water Connection WZ .,hn Steinhibel, 27075 Beverly Drive (Att.No.3E- Proposed Resolution) F. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Concerning the Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Land (Att.No.3F- Proposed Resolution) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MONDAY, MAY 24, 1993 PAGE TWO 4. PARK 5. PLANNING A. Report on Planning Commission Meeting - May 18, 1993 B. Final Plat Approval - Deer Ridge (Att.No.5B1- Planner's Memo, B2- Proposed Resolution) C. Bateson Wilson Addition - Preliminary Plat Applicant: Rick Bateson Location: 5.6 acres east of Gaipin Lake Rd & south of Murray St. (Att.No.5C1- Planner's Memo, C2- Proposed Resolution) D. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment - Parking Requirements for Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps (Att.No.5D- Planner's Memo) E. Vine Hill Market - C.U.P. and Variances Applicant: James Pyle Location: 19215 State Highway 7 (Att.No.5E- Planner's Memo) F. Simple Subdivision - Minnetonka Country Club /Paul Swanson Location: 24575 Smithtown Road /24460 Yellowstone Trail (Att.No.5F1- Planner's Memo, F2- Applicant's Response Letter G. Excelsior Covenant Church, 19955 Excelsior Boulevard - Simple Subdivision (Att.No.5G- Planner's Memo) H. Revised Concept Plan /Development Stage Plan Approval - Seasons P.U.D. Applicant: Pete Boyer Construction Location: 20095 Excelsior Boulevard (Att.No. 5H1-Planner' s Memo, H2- Engineer's Report, H3- Planner's Memo) e CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MONDAY, MAY 24, 1993 PAGE THREE 6. ACCEPTING BID FOR LIFT STATIONS 9 & 10 AND AWARD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (Att.No.6- Engineer's Report, Proposed Resolution) 7. A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT FROM THE SEWER FUND TO SETTLE SEWER BACKUP CLAIM 8. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 9. STAFF REPORTS A. City Attorney B. City Engineer C. City Planner D. Finance Director E. City Administrator 10. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Mayor Brancel B. Councilmembers 11. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Attachment) TO FOLLOW THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CONVENE EXECUTIVE SESSION - Personnel Matters ADJOURN EXECUTIVE SESSION JCH.al 5/14/93 * indicates fee or tax implication EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, MAY 24, 1993 At the beginning of the meeting announce that the Council will convene into Executive Session following the regular the meeting. AGENDA ITEM 3A - This resolution approves a garbage hauling license for David Hayes, WTI Waste Technology Inc. from Crystal, Minnesota. AGENDA ITEM 3B - The Council did include $1,000 in our 1993 operating Budget to go towards the 1993 4th of July celebration. This motion would be to approve the donation of $1,000. ~. f ~ ! AGENDA ITEM 3C - In response to a "notice to remove" offensive matter at 23155 Academy Ave., Fleet Mortgage has requested additional time to clean up the site on which they have foreclosed. Since this site was the subject of numerous previous complaints, staff recommends that no additional time be granted for compliance. Motion is to deny request to extend "notice to remove". I ~ r . jl t ~J ~ ~. AGENDA ITEM 3D - Randall and Marianne McDaniel have requested a r.o.w. permit to install lights along their private driveway on Gardendale Road. Motion is to approve the permit subj ect to limitations on light cast onto adjoining property. AGENDA ITEM 3E - This request has been withdrawn because Mr. Steinhibel has paid all fees to hook up to municipal water and found financing by private source. AGENDA ITEM 3F - This resolution is required to approve the detachment and annexation of the Cox property as requested by the City of Chanhassen. 50 feet is detached so that the entire house is in the City of Chanhassen. AGENDA ITEM 5B - Motion is to approve the final plat for five single-family residential lots in the Deer Ridge plat. Approvals include a standard development agreement and a three-party agreement between the City, the developer and Chanhassen. AGENDA ITEM 5C - Rick Bateson has requested preliminary plat approval for the Bateson Wilson Addition, a four-lot single family residential subdivision located east of Galpin Lake Boulevard and south of Murray street. The Planing Commission recommended unanimously to approve the plat subject to staff recommendations. AGENDA ITEM 5D - This zoning ordinance text amendment changes the code so that additional parking spaces are not required for convenience stores with gas pumps. The Planning Commission voted against recommending the amendment to .the City Council by a 4/2 vote at their May 4th meeting. An amendment requires a four-fifths vote by the Council. -over- AGENDA ITEM 5E - This is consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for fuel pumps and a variance for the parking requirements at vine Hill Market. The parking variance would not be required if the City Council were to pass the zoning ordinance text amendment (item 5D). The Planning Commission failed to recommend approval of the C.U.P. and variance as the vote on the recommendation was tied 3/3. Please carefully review the material enclosed. Both the C. U. P. and variance require four-fifths vote of the Council. staff should be directed to prepare a findings of fact. AGENDA ITEM 5F - The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve this application for a simple subdivision of the Minnetonka Country Club subject to staff recommendations det~iled in the Planning Director's memorandum of April 27th. The motion passed 5/0. A simple majority is required for approval. AGENDA ITEM 5G - The Planning Commission unanimously recommends that the City Council approve this simple subdivision/combination of the Excelsior Covenant Church, 19955 Excelsior Boulevard subject to the applicant recording this action within 30 days of Council approval. The parcel to be split off will be incorporated into the Seasons P.U.D. (item 5H). Approval requires a simple majority. AGENDA ITEM 5H - The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve a revised concept stage plan and development stage plan for the Seasons P.U.D. The preliminary plat for the project includes approximately one-third acre of land which the developer will buy from the Excelsior Covenant Church (see item 5G). The resolution approving the development stage plan required MnDOT approval for relocation of a storm sewer easement and Watershed District approval of the grading and drainage plan. approval requires a four-fifths vote of the Council. A formal resolution will be prepared for the next meeting. Due to project delays the developer has requested a grading permit prior to final plan approval. Staff recommends approval subject to his depositing a cash escrow or letter of credit to ensure site restoration and subject to Watershed District approval. . . AGENDA ITEM 6 - We have accepted bids for Lift stations 9 & 10. The low bid was from GHT Construction in the amount of $57,440. An Engineer's memorandum is enclosed. wi th this excellent bid we should be $20,000 to $25,000 under budget. AGENDA ITEM 7 - I have prepared a memorandum under separate cover regarding the use of sewer funds to settle the sewer backup claim. The ci ty Attorney is drafting a separate memorandum for your review. I am in the process of drafting an overall policy relating to sewer backup and will present it to the Council for consideration at a later meeting. JCH.al DATE May 24 June 14 June 28 . July 12 July 26 August 9 August 23 September 13 ..1 September 27 October 11 October 25 November 8 November 22 JCH.al 5/11/93 5/11/93 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSIONS 9J Held in Round Table Format Following the Regular City Council Meetings TOPIC OF DISCUSSION Executive Session · Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Transportation (Comp Plan) Badger/Woodhaven Wells - CIP Review for Park Funding Budget Objective Report on 1993 - Preliminary Review for 1994 Review Garbage Collection Alternatives Initiate Labor Negotiations Capital Improvement Plan - 1994 - 1998 Water Policy Questions - New Developments Operating Budget .Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Community Facilities (Comp Plan) Capital Improvement Plan- 1994 - 1998 .Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Land UsejNatural Resources (Comp Plan) . . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 p.rn. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING The meeting was called to order by Mayor Brancel at 7:00 p.m. A Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Brancel; Councilmembers Benson, Daugherty, Lewis, and Stover; Administrator Hurm, Engineer Dresel, Attorney Keane, and Financial Director Rolek. Planning Director Nielsen attended a portion of the meeting. C. Review Agenda Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the Agenda for May 10, 1993, with the addition of Consent Agenda Item 3.D., cancellation of the Work Session, and scheduling of an Executive Session following adjournment of the Regular Meeting. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - April 26, 1993 Daugherty moved, Lewis seconded to approve the City Council Minutes of April 26, 1993. Motion passed 5/0. B. City Council Work Session Minntes - April 26, 1993 Daugherty moved, Stover seconded to approve the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 26, 1993. Motion passed 5/0. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Brancel read the Consent Agenda for May 10, 1993. 1 2A " REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 10, 1993 - PAGE 2 Stover moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and to adopt the Resolutions and Motion contained therein: A RESOLUTION NO. -93 "A Resolution Approving Intoxicating liquor license Sunday and Oub." B. RESOLUTION NO. -93 "A Resolution Approving Intoxicating liquor license on Sale of Intoxicating liquor and Special Sunday Sales." C. RESOLUTION NO. -93 "A Resolution Approving Non-intoxicating Malt liquor license." D. Motion to authorize the City Administrator to hire an independent adjuster to assist in settling the sanitary sewer backup incident of April 24, 1993, should it become necessary. . Motion passed 5/0. 4. PARK A Report on Park Commission Meeting - May 3 & 4, 1993 Elizabeth Fuller, Park Commissioner, reviewed the Commission's recent activities including visiting all the City's parks and reviewing appropriate allocation of available funds. The Commission intends to develop a plan for solicitation of donations for park services and equipment. 5. PlANNING A. Report. on Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1993 . Doug Malam, Planning Commissioner, reported the actions taken by the Commission at it's meeting on May 4, 1993. 6. CONSIDER A REOUEST FOR ASSISTANCE REGARDING CITY WATER CONNECTION HOOK-UP - John and Shannon Steinlnbel. 27075 Beverly Drive Hurm referred to the Steinhibel's letter to the Council dated April 30, 1993 requesting that the City spread their water hook up fee of $4,000 as a special assessment. Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to authorize that the $4,000 water hook up fee of John and Shannon Steinhibel, 27075 Beverly Drive, be spread over a 5-year period as a special assessment at an interest rate of 7%. Motion passed 5/0. 2 t . . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 10, 1993 - PAGE 3 7. 1992 ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT - ABDO. ABDO AND EICK. Mr. Gary Groen, reviewed the City of Shorewood, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended December 31, 1992, as prepared by Abdo, Abdo and Eicle, CPA, Minneapolis, Minnesota, including the Financial and Statistical Sections of the Report. 8. REPORT ON REOUEST OF TIIE CITY OF CHANHASSEN REGARDING DEER RIDGE SUBDMSION Don Ashworth, City Manager of Chanhassen, stated that a home owned by Gerald and Lynn Cox, 6200 Cardinal, is located half in Chanhassen and half in Shorewood. All services, including sewer, water, police, fire, paramedic, etc., are received from Chanhassen and voting is also in Chanhassen. In addition, the Cox' property lies in both Hennepin and Carver Counties. Taxes are levied on the basis that 60% of the property is in Chanhassen and 40% in Shorewood. According to Ashworth, taxes are prepared manually because of the unique nature of the property. If the annexation/ de annexation is approved Shorewood will lose its share of the 40% of the Taxes derived from the property. For 1993 this amount is $105.00. Effective in 1994, the Hennepin County Auditor would pay that amount to the City of Chanhassen together with an additional $23.00 (Chanhassen's tax capacity rate is approximately 5% higher than Shorewood's). The amount paid to Carver County would be the same as paid this year and the amount paid to the school district would also remain the same. Although the Cox' agreement to the annexation/ de annexation process is not required, they will be asked to sign a consent form. According to Ashworth, should Shorewood agree to the. process, Chanhassen would maintain its eligibility in the CDBG program. Nielsen stated that the staff recommends approval of the detachment process to a limited degree, the minimal amount (30 - 50 ft) to have the entire Cox home in Chanhassen and leaving one buildable parcel in Shorewood. He recommended attaching no other conditions to the agreement. The buildable parcel accessible on the westerly side of the lot would result from a subdivision. Lewis stated the advantage to Shorewood as a result of this agreement would be the continued funding of the South Shore Senior Center and Sojourn program due to Chanhassen maintaining its eligibility in the CDBG program. Ashworth assured the Council that Chanhassen anticipates funding those programs for the next 3-5 years. The Council discussed the tax implications of the agreement. It was noted that the taxes for the Cox' will increase by $23.00 because of the higher tax imposed by Chanhassen. Stover moved, Benson seconded to approve the annexation/ deannexation agreement with the City of Chanhassen of the Gerald and Lynn Cox home at 6200 Cardinal, as recommended by the staff, with the understanding that Chanhassen with continue it's support of the South Shore Senior Center and the Sojourn program through it the Community Block Grant Program. 3 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINU1ES MAY 10, 1993 - PAGE 4 f Motion passed 5/0. Keane noted that the matter must be considered and approved by the Municipal Board and that the home owners may present their views to the Board. 9. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ESTABliSHING A LOW INCOME DISCOUNT FOR WAlER U1llllY The Council considered the Ordinanc~ establishing a low income discount for water utility. Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 274 "An Ordinance Amending Sections 903.()9.1a and 1301.02 of the City Code Establishing a Low Income Minimum Water Service Rate." Motion passed 5/0. . 10. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROmCfS The Council considered a draft ordinance which would establish special assessment procedure for street reconstruction projects. While Brancel objected to the proposed ordinance stating that it represents additional or increased taxes, the Council generally agreed the procedure provided an equitable plan in the City's efforts to reconstruct its streets over the next several years. It was the consensus of the Council that a public information meeting be conducted to receive comments from the public prior to any action being taken on the ordinance. It was agreed the meeting would be held in conjunction with a regular Council meeting in July. 11. MATfERSFROM THE FLOOR . Mr. Allan Johnson, 5865 Strawberry Lane, commented on the proposed special assessment policy for street reconstruction projects, noting that currently the General Funds are used for such projects. He noted that the new ordinance would place an additional tax burden on the individual property owners and inquired whether the policy would be retroactive allowing assessment of residents who have already had their streets repaired. 12. STAFF REPORTS A City Attorney Keane reported that the Hennepin County District Court ruled in favor of the City and all defendants in the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club matter so all claims were summarily dismissed. He noted that a 90-day appeal period was granted; however, he stated that an appeal was unlikely. 4 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINU1ES MAY 10, 1993 - PAGE 5 B. City Engineer Dresel stated that the contractor performing work on behalf of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission in the Covington Road area has requested permission to extend its work hours in order to complete the job sooner. Following brief discussion, the Council denied the request in the interests of the affected residents. C. City Planner - None. D. Finance Director - None. E. City Administrator . Hurm noted that he will attend the 3-day conference of the Minnesota City Managers May 12-14, 1993. 13. COUNCIL REPORTS A Mayor Brancel - None. B. Councilmembers Lewis noted that the contractors performing sewer-related work for the MWCC are doing a good job and the neighborhood is experiencing no interruption in its regular activities. Stover noted that the Excelsior City Council will be presenting a proposed Fire Department contract for consideration to the Mayors of affected local Cities. . 14. ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SUBJECf TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Benson moved, Stover seconded to adjourn the City Council Meeting to Executive Session at 8:20 p.m., subject to the approval of claims. Motion passed 5/0. Mayor Brancel announced that the Executive Session is scheduled to discuss the performance of the City Administrator. 5 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 10, 1993 - PAGE 6 RESPECIFULLY.SUBMfl"l'ED, Arlene H. Bergfalk Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial ATTEST: JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR BARBARA J. BRANCEL, MAYOR 6 . . .. RESOLUTION NO. -93 A RESOLUTION APPROVING REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE WHEREAS, the Shorewood city Code Section 507.05 provides for the annual licensing of refuse collectors in the City; and WHEREAS, said section provides that an applicant shall complete an application and fulfill certain requirements concerning insurance coverage and pay licensing fee; and ~ WHEREAS, the following applicant has satisfactorily completed this application and fulfilled the requirements for the issuance of a Refuse Collector's Licens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That a Refuse Collector's License be issued for the remainder of the current year and to expire on December 31, 1993 to the following applicant: Applicant Firm Name Address David Hayes WTI Waste Technology Inc 5653 Hampshire Ave N. Crystal, MN 55428 ~ ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of May 1993. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator 31\ . . License No. 032-93 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSE TO CARRY ON THE BUSINESS OF HAULING GARBAGE, TRASH, AND REFUSE WITHIN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION OF 1993. David Haves dated Aoril 29. LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO WTI Waste Technoloqv Inc. for a term of one year from the first day of January, 1993, to carryon the business of hauling garbage, trash, and refuse within the City of Shorewood, Minnesota as set forth in and pursuant to Chapter 507 of the Shorewood City Code, subject to all the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the regulations of the Board of Health and the ordinances and regulations of the ci ty of Shorewood relating thereto and which are made a part hereof, and subject to revocations at any time for violation thereof. permi t to expire on December 31, 1993. APPROVED BY THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL THIS 24th day of May 1993. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator '---'f 3A r Applicant CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPLICATION FOR REFUSE COLLECTOR LICENSE (Under City Code, Chapter 507) . -;) - U Firm Name Business Address S CO S'-3> Residence Address ~A)'1'If ../ Telephone (Business) S37- 333.3 S5U (Home) SP?- 0 773 ~J r ,~*, \ \t.....;.:..(t/ q-;2;~ Of';'(r term . Description of Motor Vehicle (s) to be used in collection J(} -C 0- q () Applicant is sufficiently covered by an insurance policy loss or injury to persons in the following amounts: ~ $ ~O 0" (YDQ each person injured Yes. ( /' No ( $SOn,DbO against maximum.coverage for each accident Yes (yj /No ( ) agai:~t ~ss or damage to property Yes (l/).J..u; No ( ) . YOUR INSURANCE POLICY FOR THE TERM OF THIS LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION. APPLICATION FEE $50.00; LICENSE FEE $25.00/PER TRUCX. TOTAL AMOUNT SUBMITTED $ (~S'6;6D() i..vD)3 b ~ Are you the owner of the business? Yes .(~ No ( If you have answered "No" to the above question, give owner's name Are you familiar with the provisions of Ordinance No. 176, an ordinance for the purpose of promoting the health and general welfare by regulating the keeping of garbage and regulating and licensirlg the conveying and hauling thereof in Shorewood? Yes (v/) No ( ) The following is a schedule of charges for our services: Type Type Type Type e= of of of of of of Service Service Service Service Service Service Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge All refuse will be hauled' and deposited at the following location(s) : . ~~~ The refuse will be disposed of in the following manner: ~.r:?/F ~/) At{I/~ . (we) hereby agree to operate the refuse collection business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Shorewood. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. /?: FIRM NAME A/c SIGNATURE POSITION -2- , ~, :,~r~~~l~)' .: -. '~':; ~j't-\..~ fl~' ~:~I~!I~:~:~~~!::=;fi~~~~~11 ,'..c ."....'~' ._~~,~~~.~.,. .::j.:/:L:l-;~;::':;;;:.:::~~:'~\'9; ~""~t] :-~;;++~'~~~.iw?::i;~\ii~::~,.;; Date .2::..: ~7,:~.'~ ~ 19 /' ~ . " ~;=,:~;::~:~I::5;~::<;,~;t}. ....::.~2:;;i.;~~nTZ.~;~;~~G;,i::~':~~i:~;.:.:~.!~~1~:~it~J' ~','..~,..;:--~:_ ,>#0,' i-':'.-i:_~:'_.!.,,:,' 7-:ir~-~"'" " . ;,!2'~:,,;Z' .l 0~~~~~-;.'~ .y~f:$..:I~~.., :~1l~~~:::. ~;J~i~~-~ :.-f:;:.:S,1':'.h~~;.:.~~.-;;_.,:,;'~:,~",":;.J -- .. ~-. -;:0' fti~~t~~!~i..~.~.;,r.',:i,:."."i..":,,:.,..',~,,,~.H,~.,'.:,f:,;';;;;~~i~t~!;:;.~.,~~.~,';~,~}e~~;~:.~:;''{':;~";~:':,;::;;;; i''''':;;';i;i:g':''i!i''~:i;l~\i\f:~_~ . ~,:',:,>':'~":~-'-~_'~':;f'~4--<;'(':::;~..~ :~"'_,I_~.I~'_'l"".~ ..-' _.~';.-( ';-.,;.~;. <~~~,_~:',',',<-'d'-"~.\;".,, _.. ~ . ,~.':'L.:. .. :,-,-'" ,:_ t "tc ~ '. --;".' .,'-' .>.:~tj~:~~{..~)t~~r~~' . -'",j: '~l~~_:;:;~~:,,:-.;j;:.' ,." -"iq r' . .'J f;~t<~t~ .>'" :<;,\J "."., . '. "..:....j . IEII historic ~Excelsior SM r. ,. ~..J. f. -v C/iPVY ;/ <t-( : /'. ,x.; _ 0 L.,'L-\ I is ~:J3 On the shores of ke Minnetonka EXCELSIOR AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE May 4, 1993 Mayor Barbara Brancel CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: 1993 Fourth of July Celebration Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce, Organizer . HONORABLE MAYOR: The Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce and its volunteers are hard at work preparing another fabulous Fourth of July on the Commons in Excelsior. This is the one time each year when the entire community comes together in celebration of our nation and our community. Last year, our fireworks display was preceded by a wonderful concert by the "Sevilles". They were so well received, we have invited them back. Plans are afoot for a larger fireworks display and as always, there will be food vendors offering popcorn, hot dogs and candy as well as flags for the children. Earlier in the day, the "Fun Run" will start at 8:00 a.m. from the Commons; and the "Criterium Bicycle Race" is scheduled in downtown Excelsior at mid-day. . Your community has been an integral part to the funding of these wonderful events. On behalf of the Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce and the Fourth of July Committee, I ask that your City renew your past support of the Fourth of July. As always, if your City can offer a larger contribution than you have in the past -- it would be most appreciated, as costs do continue to rise. Should you or your Councilmembers have questions, do not hesitate to contact either myself (474-5977) or Don Douglas (474-4531). The Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce thanks your City for your past and continuing support of our community Fourth of July celebration. Sincerely, FOURTH OF JULY COMMITTEE ~~/;:/~-~ B( Mark W. Kell~ cc: Don Douglas POST OFFICE BOX 32 . EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 · PHONE (612) 474-6461 3B .. I~PR 2 lj \9';<3 EASTLUNO, SOLSTAO & HUTCHINSON L , TO. I..AW OFFICES 1702 MIOWEST PL.AZA BUIL.OING WARREN E. EASTL.UNO MARK T. SOL.STAO THOMAS F. HUTCHINSON HANS F.ZIMMERMANN OAL.E .J. MOE MARY NORTON-L.ARSON SHARON N. HERL.ANO OAVIO S. WETHING OF COUNSEL. .JOSEPH R. CAOE CAMBRIDGE OFFICE eo I NICOL.L.ET MAL.L. FACSIMIL.E 612.334-3184 TEL.EPHON E 612.339-893 I 222 ASHL.ANO STREET SOUTH CAMBRIOGE. MINNESOTA 55008-1517 FACSIMIL.E 612.689-5874 TEL.EPHONE 612-689-5734 MINNEAPOI..IS. MINNESOTA 55402-2585 April 27, 1993 Inspection Department City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331-8927 . Rei 23155 Academy Avenue, Shorewood, Minnesota Dear Sir or Madam: This firm represents Fleet Industrial Loan Company of Minnesota, Inc. who has acquired the fee interest in the above- referenced property pursuant to a mortgage foreclosure sale. The redemption period expired on March 24, 1993. However, Fleet has not taken possession of the property because Fleet had made an agreement with Mrs. Phyllis Bakkelund to give her time to remove her possessions and vacate the property. At this point we have been unable to determine if she has in fact vacated the property. She would.not discuss the matter with me when I called her today on the telephone. The agreement was that she would vacate the property by April 15, 1993 and we believe she has not yet removed all of her personal property. . Today I received a topy of a notice to remove the offensive and unhealthy substances which litter the property. Fleet would be delighted to remove this material and intends to, but I have advised Fleet that it cannot have this material disposed of until Ms. Bakkelund has removed her possessions. For Fleet to dispose of this property could potentially leave it liable to Mrs. Bakkelund for damages. Please accept this letter as Fleet's assurance that it will clean up the property and remove the offensive material to the satisfaction of the City of Shorewood as soon as we are able to determine that Ms. Baakelund has in fact vacated the property and that she has abandoned all of the personal property and debris at the property address. ~6 . . Inspection Department Page 2 April 27, 1993 If you have any questions regarding this matter or need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. DJM~ cc: Peggy Merkes Timothy Q. Grathwol, Esq. Very truly yours, EASTLUND, SOLSTAD & HUTCHINSON, LTD. rJS)aJ-.v ,4. nlc'-f Dale J. LMoe t I PROPERTY BafE Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331.8927 · (612)474-3236 5 May 1993 . Mr. Dale J. Moe Eastlund, Solstad & Hutchinson, Ltd. 1702 Midwest Plaza Building 801 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402-2585 Re: ~3T55Acaderny Av~,'Shorewood, Minnesota - -.-~- Fleet IiidustnaILoarCCompany of Minnesota, Inc. . Dear Mr. Moe: .L . ,.. ,.. . Thank you for your letter of 27 April 1993 regardi~g status of the above-referenced property . We have accepted your letter as an appeal the Notice to Remove, although your letter did not specify how much additional time is n ed before Fleet could clean up this property. We have scheduled your appeal for the ay 1993 City Council Agenda, -however, due to the extensive problems we have experienced with regard to complaints against this property, staff will not recommend that any additional time beyond Jo(.May be extended for cleaning up the site. Please be advised that this property will be r~~spected for compliance onMMay 1993.. ,,'1 . Jt~ - If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, CITY OF SHOREWOOD /JA-tLdJ&j/ (l. ~ // Bradley J. Nielsen Planning Director A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I' ,\ . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson . _ CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM '\ TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 19 May 1993 RE: R. O. W. Permit - McDaniel - Gardendale Road FILE NO.: -405 (R.O.W. Permits) Last year the McDaniels were granted a permit to construct a private driveway on the Gardendale Road right-of-way. They now request permission to install light fixtures along the new driveway. . Per staff's direction the applicants have kept lighting to a minimum as needed for safety and security. Their plan shows three, 3-foot bollard-style lights, one at the entrance to Manor Road (outside of the Manor Road r.o.w.), one halfway down the driveway and one where the driveway curves onto their lot. . It is recommended that the request be granted subject to the lights being directed so as not to . cast more than .5 foot-candles of light onto adjoining residential properties. cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Tim Keane Randall McDaniel Tim Stefan A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~.D. ~..oo " ~/ APPLICN1'ION FOR PERMIT '1'0 KEEP on MAINTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLICLY OWNED nIGlIT-Ofo'-WA Y PUHSUAN1' '1'0 StfOREI'IOOD OHDINAlJCr:: NO . 121. ~JO :SO ~~~II1.\l1) V ~ \c,1lJ ~. ". Plea~e type or print lugl~ly 1. APPLICANT INFOffi1ATION Please givG the name(s) of all persons who to be maintained in right-of-way. NAME(S) ~-ANDA \-L- MC.DPrN l81- MA1l-l kN 1\IS- M L.-TJ4"rN l e1- ADDRESSES "2-0 1-0 ~ 'MAN 0 Il... J!-OPrD _L ~ S'ttc~ooo ~,..j S-S- 33 I own the private property TELEPHONE Nor Mt1WN 2. . RIGHT-OF-WAY ~ Please name the highway,. road t street, alley or other right-oi-way upon which you are requesting to maintain private property. d?/11Z-t>er\..J ~ 3. Pl~8~~ d~scI'ibe as carefully as possible the exact location or address on the right-af-way where the private property is to be maintained, as well as the nature, extent and purpose of the requested encroachment on the right-ai-way. (Attach a photograph or sketch if possible). Tk.t. rvo~~J~ fA ~kliWu\ J.;r(1t(, t}..rt,[;.~ ~t ~oko '? lAAMltOV" ~. _~k l/'t,1.\J~~t '$ -pI/" ~ bol~A -M~ (:~I '^~~) o\.vr'I/t..vV'~_ lto;,^-f -n'S..wvu .($ fttM'V\ tJ '" ~ ~ to ~ J. . ~ In considar~lt1on of 8l'lprOval of this permit, I h~reby knowingly and voluntarily waive any right to recover. .rr~.m the C1 ty of 3horewood for damage occurring to property in the right-of-wIi:1Y CiS clbo~l~ described, which d"msgc results from the porform,,"ce by the Ci;r of Shorewood or it.5 agc::uts (.f any public duti\):,.j r.~qUir'~d.' l~W.~'tA ill t~ tj. \ ~ ,0\ ~ -J I . . --..J. f?r t~~\ ~_ VVtNV (~ W\eVJIM, Applicant signatl,.u'e(:3) , Per-red t ( ) Approved ( ) Not Approved r:'utc " . . j ,/ ' , ! . Q'T~.--rrr ." 7. U fJ E "--" ~I ~l> \ l+ ~H lie Pk'l Et> PF-WE \ WP~TJ rto V'7 IS. (,0 vl(f(ON t NOF1~t (NO~) r~ li D !\N l c (, r-,o. w. ~ktfJ l1\N P(Nc'e I.J,-U . L- ^"e r . I --"'..~ ~.~ RESOLUTION NO. -93 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF LAND WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes 414.061 authorizes the concurrent detachment and annexation of land; and WHEREAS, the cities of Chanhassen and Shorewood have agreed to the concurrent detachment and annexation of a parcel of property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota as follows: 1. The following described land shall be detached from the City of Shorewood and annexed to the City of Chanhassen: 2. That part of Lot 87, Auditor's Subdivision Number 135, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 87; thence West along the South line thereof to the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line thereof, a distance of 50 feet; thence in a straight line easterly to a point on the East line"of said lot 50 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence South along the East line thereof, to the point of beginning. . This Resolution is contingent upon the City of Chanhassen adopting a similar resolution approving the aforementioned detachment and annexation and is further contingent upon the approval of the Minnesota Municipal Board. . 3. The city Administrator/Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City of Chanhassen. Upon receipt of a similar resolution from the City of Chanhassen. The city Administator/Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Minnesota Municipal Board. . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the city council of the city of Shorewood this 24th day of May 1993. (SEAL) Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/clerk 3F .. MAY~19-1993 14:58 FROM HENN CO OFC OF PLNG & DEV TO ~9375739 P.01 ~OH paR: James :srouqhman.. nirector, Entitle:asent mM' .L iJ I~... ~. c........u.ti.e. D.I;...bian,. CGU FROM.; Sha1lln(~ Huokleby, Director, CoaDIlUni.'t.y !'lanu.i.nq GIld De~lopaeQ.t, 5. 9C . S~~ 1I8U1UiIP.in COWl'Cy ~equ.al.i.fJ..r.:::a~ioA 9.4-96 Chap'h.asen, Minnesota .,;,-:. . . POst-tl- brand fax transmittal memo 7671 .cfPlIGi!8. ..2.-..... To . Fl'Om r. frlJJ.S.S ,,, ef.,U Co. co. Dept. FalC# Q"1? <: 17 .~ Q PncM# .1trf~ S8-. Fall I . . ," MAY-19-1993 14:59 FROM HENN CO OFC OF PLNG & DEV TO f,:I9375739 P.02 ., . ~y resideni:.8. If you have any further quelftioDS, p:L....e ~eel f;ree ~D contact Alan Joles a~ PrS 612-370-3068 or cindy l5ehnke a.t :rrs 612-:370-3026. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331.8927 · (612)474.3236 MEMORANDUM '- -~ TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 20 May 1993 RE: Deer Ridge - Final Plat FILE NO.: . 405 (92.33) ~// As mentioned at a recent Council meeting, Chanhassen has agreed to approve a five-lot plat for Deer Ridge without condition of detachment/annexation of lots within the plat. . Attached is a proposed resolution and a copy of the three-party agreement with Chanhassen. The City's standard developmenfagreement for the project will be forwarded under separate cover. Please note that the resolution allows 60 days to record the plat. The extra 30 days. is necessary to provide adequate time for Chanhassen to approve the three-party agreement. . ... ~ If there are any questions relative to this matter please do not hesitate to contact. me prior to Monday night's meeting. - cc: Jim Hurro Tim Keane Joel Dresel Jeff Williams "'-, ~ 5.P;.\. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF DEER RIDGE WHEREAS, the final plat of Deer Ridge has been submitted in the manner required for the platting of land under the Shorewood City Code and Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of the City of Shorewood. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood: (1) That the final plat of Deer Ridge is hereby approved. (2) That the approval is specifically conditioned upon the terms and conditions contained in the attached Development Agreement between the developer and the City of Shorewood and the attached Development Agreement with the City of Chanhassen. (3) That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Certificate of Approval for the plat and said Development Agreements on behalf of the City Council. . (4) That this final plat shall be filed and recorded within 60 days of the Developer's receipt of this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the execution of the Certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Clerk shall be conclusive, showing a proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 24th day of May 1993. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk 5 Ie I 2 · . . AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this day of , 1993, by and between the City of Shorewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Shorewood"), the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("Chanhassen") and J. Scotty Builders, Inc., ("Developer"). WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of certain lands described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof, ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to Shorewood for approval of a subdivision of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the Developer and Shorewood have requested that Chanhassen provide sewer and water services to the Subject Property. Chanhassen has agreed to permit the Subject Property to connect to Chanhassen's sewer and water system, all subject to certain terms and conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and approval by Shorewood of the proposed subdivision, Shorewood, the Developer and Chanhassen agree as follows: 1. Services Provided. Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water services to the Subject Property shall be provided and maintained by Chanhassen, and Chanhassen shall directly bill the Shorewood residents for the services. Included in the service charges will be a surface water utility fee. Shorewood agrees to promptly certify the fees as a tax against the property if the fees are not paid when due. 2. Utility lines. The Developer shall be responsible for the construction of all utility lines in accordance with Chanhassen's latest edition of Standard Construction 03:1i:93 1-1:-16 '5'612 452 5550 CAMPBELL I0.TTSON ............ CHAX. CITY HALL !4J003:006 Specifications. The plans and specifications must be reviewed and approved by Chanhassen. The Developer shall enter into a development contract with Chanhassen and provide the financial security necessary to guarantee installation of the improvements. 3. Construction and Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all construction costs incurred in connecting the Subject Property with the Chanhassen sewer line. The Developer shall be responsible for costs of inspection, trunk charges, sewer availability charges, connection charges, user charges, and all other charges and fees which are normally associated with sewer service provided by Chanhassen. 4. Riaht to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until the Developer's plans for on-site ponding have been approved by Chanhassen. Shorewood shall be responsible for the maintenance and dredging of the pond. 5. Park Dedication. Chanhassen will not require a park dedication fee on the Subject Property. 6. Street Construction. A new street will be built by Developer in a manner consistent with Chanhassen street standards. The proposed street location is attached as Exhibit 2. The Developer shall enter into a development contract with Chanhassen and Shorewood covering all aspects of street construction as well as drainage improvements for the Subject Property. 2 . . . . years from the date of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be null and void. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to be executed on the day and year first above written. Dated: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . day of , 1993, by Donald J. Chmiel, on behalf of the City of Chanhassen. Notary Public Dated: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Don Ashworth, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . day of , 1993, by Don Ashworth, on behalf of the City of Chanhassen. Notary Public Dated: CITY OF SHOREWOOD By: , Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1993, by , on behalf of the City of Shorewood. Notary Public 4 . . Dated: By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) CITY OF SHOREWOOD , City Clerk ~he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1993, by , on behalf of the City of Shorewood. Developer: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) Notary Public J. Scotty Builders, Inc. By: Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 199 , by , on behalf of J. Scotty Builders~ Inc. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Notary Public CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (612) 452-5000 5 CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson ?755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (6121474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: / Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council I FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 27 April 1993 RE: Bateson Wilson Addition - Preliminary Plat ~" FILE NO.: 405 (93.07) BACKGROUND Mr. Rick Bateson requests approval of a preliminary plat for approximately 5.6 acres of land located south of Murray Street and east of Galpin Lake Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). He proposes to divide the property into four single-family residential lots as shown on Exhibit,R . The subject property is zoned R-1C, Single-Family Residential and contains 243,485 square feet of area. The site is characterized by a dramatic change in grade, dropping 63 feet from east to west. A designated wetland occupies approximately 46,500 square feet of the westerly side of the site. . . The proposed lots range in area from 22,300 square feet to 57,100 square feet (exclusive of wetlands) and average 41,250 square feet. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Upon review of the proposed plat and Shorewood' s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the following issues are raised: . A. Zoning Requirements. - 1. Lot Area. Following is how the proposed lots comply withR-1C lot area requirements (20,000 square feet): A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ;---SL-I '. . Re: Bateson Wilson Addition Preliminary Plat 27 April 1993 Total Wetland Net Area LotI Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 22,300 - 57,100 59,400 72,700 20,250 26,250 22,300 57,100 39,150 46,450 --2. Lot Width. ,Lot 2 does not comply with R-IC requirements. Lots must be 100 feet wide at the building line (front setback). Lot 2 is only 95 feet wide. Since Lots 3 and 4 are at the l00-foot minimum, the five-foot adjustment to Lot 2 must be made on the north side. Although Lot 1 will be reduced in area it will still comply with minimum area requirements. v - \ B. Subdivision Requirements. . Many of the requirements of Shorewood's Subdivision Code will be addressed under separate cover by the City Engineer. In addition the following items must be resolved. . - 1. The plat should include "Block 1". 2. The final plat must include drainage and utility easements, 10 feet on each side of all side and rear lot lines. The City Engineer should determine if a wider easement should be required along the drainage ravine on the north side of Lot 1. 3. The street right-of-way complies with City Code, despite the unusual configuration of the cul-de-sac. Its shape is the result of the irregular east boundary of the site, but.allows for access to future lots on adjommg properties. " , RECOMMENDATION , The preliminary plat is generally consistent with Shorewood's development requirements. Approval is therefore recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 2 must be widened to 100 feet at the front building line. J 2. The fmal plat should include "Block 1". 3. The fmal plat should include drainage and utility easements 10 feet along each side of - each side and rear lot line. A wider easement may be required if recommended by - the City Engineer. ,-' - 2 - I ' . . ~, Re: Bateson Wilson Addition Preliminary' Plat 27 April 1993 ' 4. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utilities are subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer. ' 5. Grading and drainage must be approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 6. The designated wetland area should be set aside as a "9rainage and wetland conservation easement". ~ , 7. As a condition of final plat approval the developer must pay $3000 ($750 x 4) in park. dedication fees. 8. As a condition of [mal plat approval the developer must pay $4000 ($1000 x 4) in local sanitary sewer access charges. 9. The final plat for the property must be submitted within six months of the Council's approval of the preliminary plat. I' 10. Upon receipt of the [mal plat, staff will prepare a standard development agreement for the project. . cc: Jim Hurm, Joel Dresel Tim Keane Rick Bateson Mark Koegler ), - ! - 3 - " . , ---~-------------------------_J___________~J!~____~___:~. --1------------[ff------------ I : . \ : \> ~ : r', :r . J i ", ! ~.i .. --i--~--------------------~~;~~~~------------~l---_____ . 0 In ::.' - : I, I): ' I U9 . LI .L9,........ ......... ~l.[!;t ......... i 1\ ~ 8: : . ',\) I"> ..;: ~ a. : 'J " - "" ~ ----..: . ~-, 'n .------__ '" '~'1 "'i: ---------~---_J '~ i U) \\ \ J ~ i : I"> \ In ~ I : -.J '('.0 : ').1. :- : .,' . /; '..... l'~1 O. N\ - "..; i ~~ : '\~ ~~--"- ~ ....v ~ .... ..'oN .~ ..~ .... ... . 0 ~ i\\) 8! -- ~ \. \ -i ------------------------- I, . C~'. '" ... ~ N N ~~~~ \ ' ~ \.. " ~ ... :;;l ..." "1 .... ". -ro.....:- , -...:. .... .- ...(. 116~ ... l.... , o \ I .\ I \ \ \ \ \ I \ : : \ , I , , ; . ...." \'\ .\ \ ~ ,-----.;--t L : .....L.. ItO :' "l:I" C) :~ -"~ ::. ~ ~ .- '\ - a: : '-',\' ~ I---J!?!.-- ? ; ~ :R .;n ~ :-. ...... . I", "" : C~) ~ r--~~---l- , '".- f ' "f.O ':il", - :-('~l'- : "1:.: . ---~-.;, ----oli--- /' ... i;;t ,0 to ~ :.r ~ -..J o , I f',t ;,....., 1\1, \'-. ~ ~: '..( 0 ',\ : ..::..~i~---------J : ':..\ 1""1 -__ .: I \' \ ~ ~.Lr.---~--~--L~_ ': \! Qo .60r---~.~ . , . ,~. . t",,: ,", '(So i \....: '\:'N \:f'\'1 ""- ~ ,: :}:ll N \: - ....... ~...------~ .---..- : 0;- J .'\r- ~"" ;z ,; I :'."'.'.:::'~ ~'" ~, nO' "). - . ~ ~ : \ I).. _____-.- jl\ 2: : \----- ~ ~ =~ ~ : \ /\~ ~.. , ..:y: ~ . _!)'" \ ;1 " ! ;;:l / " ' "1 -"- - '. . ,'. c-. -.J.'~. .......: ...., ~ ., ~ 1:-lf~?~,,!-, ~ ~ ~< ::;.:' f :::. I .........'..... -.J_ _ail :"-t\-. ........ r,' ___ __~_~__ . . ~-----i.6Ol-':'----.....,_"'.,~ lee ,/ '" ~ I .....~# ~ - '.. '. . $~;;(~ ;.) .. m - .. ...... -" ------_ l'~ ~. . ~ /~ '. --~----------.1 J) ."" . - ., . ;~~.o .J) ~'''''j' ~ -~ - -- \ : 8' --:""'1":'::, : : i \~'--I: "J :oz:..~. ~ il') :~, 51 ~ : ,...,:I-l) ~ N '\"':~ ~: '_ . ,'. -' - .~i.J: : z . I~' '. I t I ! 'I'}: : ._t_____., , : " I : : ll) L_<!.9__: : ---..J_: ~_0jJ_ :~......~ : t. 01 _...... I ...) : i) : '-l::J I :I : \'h'N 'I, N , (/..... l) ......../0 co ' ~ ~e ;~ 9(1 $ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... { 19 lil ~ \ : -(. , . I~ .' N \~i ~ \. ... .. .... .... \, \. \ " '\.1.) '" ,..., t:c 'fb4J. .~ '0..\ J tl~o.... ~ .. :: ~ ~ ~.~,;I~ ~~~ 1'1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ .....- :eil'OIIlF;o N~p"... -. ~ - {~'o'.J~~ ~ lItl )L9 'tZ1 '.61.~l.(Jl : <.D I- o -It I- > o o ~ '009 Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Bateson Wilson Addition ,..., .... ~ :") . BATESON WILSON ADDITION PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR BATESON BUILDERS IN LOT 86, AUD. SUB. NO.135 • r • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA . A I M�J R • A lf; STR�ET i J _— N •h - .077.e., T {�_... mi /; i .Q$ .rsN _ , se. . i2?.0 - • . __J ..X \•• ..T // / v . ■ °\\ 44d r * •ter! ' i ,,.. r. / / I {( 1 l . ' \ 1r I I / / / //j% . • //. - ' 1 I \- ,' / / „....-• /I / \ \ /; / / //, / Ii / : / i T '' N .t$ ---- /t/ , / e .'1 / . i 1. / ' ' A % .-. 7 ---- N \,... - ----„N, -... , / , / ,,' / ) ... , ,, , f.:17/ , ...,, , I f -.. ____..---- , \ .. _----„,,'-%,,, ---__ ,- / /' / ; / ' / .:/ ./ / t: / ,/ro 012- I , h l a )8 � o,^ 1 -1 7 % %7t � / � „,,,, ill ,, ! / / \ \ / rf . l 1 a e 4 '• � • I II /17/ ` ' 1 ” > I ` J % fn C Minnesota, EXCEPT / ip,e '. W. 1 ( \ / — / / / that part of Lot 86 described aas�follows: Beginning at a point distant 377.00 feet � 1 I — / Y ` _. I -Ill _� / > �y East of the Northwest comer of said Lot 86; thence on an assumed bearing of 1 f • _- 55c� � i s., 1 ■ ,,. 1 / 7 _ %� ' • — ./ I _ West along -the North be of said Lot 88 to said Northwest comer, thence III � t _ -� ��`� T — Northwesterly hwestery along the Northwesterly st Inc said Lot 86 a ance o 242.00• � k — \� \ ' \ I I I ' �/ � r� / feet; thence South 62 degrees 13 o minutes East to Its Intersection wit a line i -�: • . I \ i I I I i — y!— drawn on a bearing rtiW South Z7 degrees 47 minutes West from a point on a ern 1 1 ' te _ drawn on a loco of South from the olnt of beginning and distant 78.00 feet m , ? /' / \\ • \ \' i `{ i \ i , I i I It o I j � - h i from said o •ill 1 I I ` Gr \ \ ' i I i ' �� point o egYs>Ing; thence North 27 degrees 47 minutes East to said } _ \ ' is part off Lot 86 descnbed as follows` Bsgkring at a beginning, ALSO EXCEPT point • One drawn on that 7 i4/1 I 1 1 ' ` \ `�, \ A t I E. /', 1 02P bearing of South a distance of 78.00 feet from a point on the North the o said Lot 0 q I I . I ' t \\\ \ 1 \ \a% ` \ V\ 1 • . + " �� (1/..0.F // 86 distant 377.00 feet East from the northwest comer of said Lot 86; thence on a • 1 U \ ! bearing of North a distance o 78.00 feet; thence on bearing of East a t9stance o ', , Imo_ - — -- — -' - j�� a v ' t ) h a \ \ \ t , o / 129.82 feet; thane South 5 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds West • distance of ance '' t \ h ■ \ o \ e / � 68.09 feet; thence South 40 degrees Wet a distance of 245.00 feet; thence on a J � / 1 I \ - -- lJ l� _ 1 \ ` \ \ \ \ \ t i ' ',/0/ // t � . / Ws from the point of beginning; thence North 27 degrees 41 mimeos Eat the \ \ e I • 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 ` I `/ f p 'J ° G ` point of beginning, ALSO EXCEPT that part o Lot 86 described as follows: 1 • ; \, \\ ` , I 1 It �- _._ Beginning at the most northeasterly • ot northeaerly comer said Lot 86; thence smithery along ` I a t \1\••.‹ h I \ 1 \ ` `, 1 I i ' ` III ` (r/ an sry tlne o sold Lot 86 a distance o 355.00 net; t hence cost paralel with ' 1 r ` , I I I I 1 the most o northerly line said Lot 86 a distance of 54.00 feet; thence northerly 1 ' 1 ' ` '1 \ `\ \ ' (' ' n deflecting es ecting right 27 degre a distance of 7 0 et; t ie let: thence 1 -- ` I 1 1 1� I 1 I • noMeatery to a point on said most northerly lute of sai Lt 86 distant 1.00 feet I n , I I I ` ` , h 1 ' // ( westerly of said most northeat comer ery coer of Lot 86; trance eatery to the poet west 613.80 ) I/// / 1 I of beginring, / \ I , l / 1 I l I ' I I '1 ` I I I I I Also EXCEPT 1M most northerly 18.00 net of the above deserted property. • 1 \ / , { I .1 r. a +u • pu, a.f ,.y Fe S.6 az.: . • DRAWN BY REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION "` i+ }�/*���� ��mK PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR Exhibit B thereby certify that this su^ry was prepared by me or under me direct super. /- • CO I 1 COFFIN � & GRONBERG, INC. I \ B AT E S O N BUILDERS PRELIMINARY PLAT, th vision. ly m. and that I am a du registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under r e laws d the State of Minnesota. 4 Consulting Engineers, Land Surveyors, Site Plai er5 DESIGNED BY ����- `� 482 Tamarack Avenue • Lang Like, MN 55356 IN LOT 86, AUD. SUB. NO. 135 " a r ► rg hlinnesota License Nurfiber 1275 612471.. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • 1 . . April 29, 1993 O\'4~lnc, 300 Park. Place Center 5775 Wa)'7-ata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55116-[228 612.595.5775 J -800-753-5775 FAX 595-5i74 Mr. Brad Nielsen . City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 fngineers Archilec;ts Planners Surveyors Re: Bateson Wilson Addition - Preliminary Plat Dear Brad: Upon completing review of the preliminary plans for the above referenced project, we have the following list of items that need to be addressed before approval: '" Storm Sewer 1. Contrary to extending the existing 12" PVC culvert to the west under Murray Court, an 18" Rep culvert should be installed. We also suggest combining the proposed low point storm sewer with the 18" RCP culvert, resulting in only one outlet. Sanitazy Sew~ 1. It appears that the sanitary sewer between MH 1 and MIl 2 could be shallowed, accompanied by a drop at MH 1. Street 1. A small vertical curve at station 0 + SO is recommended. 2. The Shorewood Street Ordinance provides for, essentially, a 7-ton road design. No soil information was provided to evaluate the proposed street sections and the section shown is the minimum allowable. Additional subgrade work and/or a section increase may be required during construction to achieve the 7-ton design requirement. 3. Bitumfuous base and wear courses should be MnjDOT, Type 31 and Type 41 respectively, with Type A aggregate in the wear course. It is preferred that the bituminous material be supplied by a certified plant. 4. Concrete curb and gutter is recommended. r:qual OI'l'Ct'\:.lnity Employer . . .Mr. Brad Nielsen Apri129, 1993 Page 2 Grading/Miscellaneous 1. Silt fence will be required on the west side of the proposed roadway and cul-de- sac. 2. It appears that retaining walls may be necessary on Lots 1 and 3, west of the proposed building pads. 3. Any retaining wall that exceeds 4 feet in height must have an engineering analysis and design along with a fence on top for safety reasons. To avoid this, we recommend terracing the retaining walls with four fQot "steps". 4. Detention ponding may be required to hold run-off rates to existing conditions. Our investigation was limited to an engineering standpoint, including grading, street, and sanitary sewer utility construction. Please contact me if you have any questions on these items at 595-5695. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. /}. ?~; .0? C.. , / ".1<---, /.' -' "-_.....4... Joel Dresel, P.E., L.S. ' City Engineer c: Mark Gronberg - Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. H:\CML\JME\ENGINEER\1AD\LEITERS\042993.BN . . April 29, 1993 AFR 3 0 \993 Mr. Brad Nielsen Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 filE COpy l.5d~,,-+-J ~~ , ,. ~ I~/ .~~.( , ,../ .,'.--(-1" Dear Mr. Nielsen: We are sending this letter as we are unable to attend the public hearing of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, May 4, 1993. This hearing is in regard to Rick Bateson's request for approval of a preliminary plat to divide approx. 5.6 acres into four single-family residential lots which would access onto Murray St. We have lived in Shorewood on Murray Street for almost 15 years, and we are vehemently opposed to this request for the following reasons: 1. Avery hazardous traffic situation would be present if four homesites (approx. eight additional vehicles) were to access onto Murray at the site shown on map provided with the Legal Notice. Entry on Murray at this location would be very dangerous because it is just east of a hill at which point vehicles traveling east on Murray would not be able to see a car pulling out onto Murray until their car was almost at this location. That hill is dangerous now because the road is narrow and cars traveling east and west must be sure to stay well left of the center to avoid possible collisions. We have a very difficult time keeping motorcycles and cars from speeding up and down Murray now, without adding this potentially dangerous situation to our street. 2. There are many children who live on Murray Street, and we feel their safety would be jeopardized by the increased traffic that four new homesites would generate. 3. Since a major portion of this property includes wetlands (the pond and marshy area adjacent to Galpin Lake Road), construction of four one-half acre or larger single-family dwellings will certainly disturb the natural environment of these wetlands, which I believe are protected by the State. We are assuming that a buildable lot in Shorewood is still one-half acre of land. It was three-quarters of an acre when we bought our home in 1978. 4. If approval for these homesi ~s is gi ven, the residents on Murray Street will be subjected to. having a portion of our street torn up in order to hook these four homesites to the city sewer system. We would also be subjected to traffic tie-ups and dangerous situations with heavy trucks hauling equipment and materials to these homesites. Since the homes in this area have private wells, drilling four new private wells for these homes could affect the water table. Has this issue been addressed? We are hopeful that the Planning Commission will deny Mr. Bateson's request, and allow our neighborhood to remain intact and to preserve Shorewood's commitment to its rural asthethics and natural environment. Sincerely, ,\{'l'-~~F~ Nancy and Steve Feller 2253_5 ~ay Str;.:7Y. .. . // ~~ Ric ard Sanders 22540 Murray Street . . . WfV!vU/ t! lb. V~/L .~A-el0-~~L ,~~"/I~( ~ 7~i>-,- ~ . (V\((A1 ~( lC( 'i ~ J.!l€ CLA.. '7'01 . IJ-vuvt t/- .. . . . 7?~ ~ ..A..,- /;~ /U~JEi~ " '. b[ ~~ 1 ~ ~1J.~ --8J.~ ~-i. 7;1i< v. pIu4 d Alt ;fd4e- ~~N... "4. ~2:;W.L~7tr ~. f ~ (141.,) Afw /UJ~ d.-<-<L/. ~ 1 ~ /J-cuu;t. J ;/ ':Jk'V'-< -rJi) d':~.J1; .... >1-<.... '_.1;, i4 du~.'. ;.~.. j' -de ~.' /'.. !~7~hJ..&V. . '" t(liu~~~'~u ..-4 ~~, '7 ~~~:r tiu1 U-(' i4 /IL' . ~~u' 4~ 4; 7MM4L~ ..~~ d', '~u~ Yu~ i4 AI~t.. 4AAd ~J ~.4. ~ f~~' ~. ii;.~ .~. ozd Hi Ai.. ~ ~.'~' '.J~t}. ,r14 .;Loa.( /Jdue ~ -7U~* ~.. (,1M . ~~~ O'~~~ J.vu.dty d~v<<~ tU;::;JJ . -p '-t' 4lk A.,t'~ -- -~ ~ 7~H' JILt' A4t~q/J '!; - 7l"ttavk~ '67ctg~~ifMU". . <;,.o>.Mlt..~v/ /UlWUMt /)7Jue.t~~'U~ t< II tJ...{,4R IIf- ~ 'P&(# )J 0Jd,{ d~ t I V . . ~~ . ZLuJl '/J?'1A- f11.-7Ul""~~f ~ At~ /b- ~4{J ~ ?;; jt{JUJ~~ tUw~ '~7. .. o iJ"lUt 1/i,1J0.) ("'\'/J . . . UJ~ E. 1\:0i~ (\.1C'1<.2t~ 6l?{.o3D tv'l<<.4 ~ &-e~?.Q.M.r?p~ MAY I 8 /993 . 1tt /~ ;f2 40; ~,on"lJoor( (!iht (!~ ' . 4 A)- ,4.- ~jr(:rY1 ~ 0-.hPrRLL)()(,)C{ Af-J-Itcl j~ ~ ~~'1;~~~;!l:::J:;~oLr ~~Cl~:;.LJ;t~ 2~ ~:Ke f2d. (Uld fJJWHl o '1.1.La 1 4 --1 'j- e~) b-< L tJJ).~ _ I f 0r : P ~ t::V:U ./ CA-rrI iJ id t.JL) ~ YL O..-U. )~1'.:ti ~ ) f::.Ju -;b Ll.m-u.Jd /:J-e., ('~ ~~ M. aYl.d ~d ---A.-1Llrro J J-~t. U){)JJ lcL ---. fhu.) ~~d (TPL#l)rraJ~ ~/::;:;~k-~-ha~tU~/,J fj?1iA-J 15B ~.__ ~':kf>t~ ~-didud;W1,JJ) 'rDA,J.: ,<lU:R/.JJ ~~~..~) _~.t-ilL - ________~ ~ ~~----f:fJ----_-_--~--- _____ - 4r-e Ld___~--~~-~---CUJ.oL----------------------- -~...----.-ff'c~-~~.-~--~--..&~~---.- .~~:~~:_----~~~:~--~~- . - ~ -.-dt p.4-V .iMu n -'I )- tA~- tJu 1-.J:6~~---._-~---':~~=~ ____~ . · ~--Cd:fu/J- * -' ... - - --~-.-- - .- - -------- .~~~==:--!f;;:;/;#!!fte~~~ .---= ~ '1' i~' 0 ; · y i .~ ~~ ~ ~ { ~~ ~ . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROvAL FOR BATESON WILSON ADDmON WHEREAS, RICK BATESON (Applicant) has an interest in certain land within the City of Shorewood and has applied to the Council for preliminary approval of a plat to be known as Bateson Wilson Addition; and WHEREAS, Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a Memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 27 April 1993, which Memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a letter to the City Planner, dated 29 April 1993, which letter is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Shorewood Planning Commission on 4 May 1993, for which notice was duly published and all adjacent property owners duly notified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That Applicant's request for preliminary plat approval of Bateson Wilson Addition is hereby granted. 2. That such approval is subject to the recommendations set forth in the City Planner's Memorandum dated 27 April 1993, the City Engineer's recommendations set forth in his letter to the City Planner, dated 29 April 1993, and the terms and conditions contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of 4 May 1993 on file at City Hall. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 24th day of May, 1993. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator/Clerk 5 c.z. . <~ ) ~ ,/- MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 28 April 1993 RE: Zoning Text Amendment - Parking Requirements for Convenience Stores with Accessory Gas Pumps FILE NO.: 405 (93.09) At its 6 April meeting the Planning Commission directed staff to research parking requirements for convenience grocery stores with accessory gas pumps. We had discussed in the review of the Vine Hill Market c.u.p. that our current Code may be outdated with respect to such uses. . ,- As mentioned at previous meetings, the first thing staff does when researching a zoning requirement is to check with other cities to see what they require. Our research turned up different results than preliminary findings made by Jim Pyle. A number of communities which have updated their zoning ordinances (e.g. Lakeville, New Hope, Otsego, Little Canada, Oak Park Heights, Wayzata, Delano, Buffalo, St. Michael) do not require additional parking spaces for c9nvenience stores with gas pumps. At least three other outer ring suburbs (Blaine, Coon Rapids and Champlin) go so far as to allow spaces at ,the pumps to be counted as part of the required parking. Site circulation was considered to ) be as, or more, important than extra parking. I talked to an individual who used to site Brooks' Superette stores. Their standard 3000 square foot store included 15 parking spaces. He indicated that they never experienced parking shortages even in communities which allowed spaces at the pumps to be counted. He also indicated that approximately 50 percent of their sales were to people who were there to buy ,gas. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /~.5J> . . . .. Re: Zoning Text Amendment , Parking Requirements for Convenience Stores with Accessory Gas Pumps 28 April 1993 A timely article in the March issue of Zoning News, a publication of the American Planning Association, provides some interesting statistics relative to convenience stores. Copyrights prevent duplicating the article in its entirety, but the most pertinent statements were that ". . . most stores are between 2000 and 3000 square feet. II and "... most have between one and . 10 parking spaces;... ". " Based upon our findings the attached draft Code amendment has been prepared. Please note that the amendment does not recommend including spaces at the pumps as parking spaces. Rather it simply does not require additional spaces due to accessory gas pumps. The Planning Commission and Council are reminded that the amendment applies to any site which is zoned for convenience grocery stores. Fuel pumps will, however, continue to be reviewed by conditional use permit. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane JoerDresel / I \. c - 2 - .' . . '. -DRAFT- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1201 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1: Section 1201.03 Subd. 5.h.(21) of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to read: "(21) Motor Fuel Station: At least four (4) off-street parking spaces plus two (2) off-street parking spaces for each service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other items than strictly automotive products, parts or service shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this Ordinance. Parking for convenience stores with accessory gas pumps shall be based upon the principal use. " Section 2: publication. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this day of , 1993. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk . ; MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWO.OD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad-Nielsen . DATE: 1 April 1993 RE: Vine Hill Market - C.U.P. for Fuel Pumps and Variance to Parking Requirements FILE NO.: 405 (93.06) BACKGROUND . In October of last year the City Council considered an application by James Pyle requesting a conditional use permit to install fuel pumps at the Vine Hill Market, located at 19215 State Highway 7 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The request also included variances to certain parking requirements. It was the second time Mr. Pyle had applied for a C.U.P. and variances~ Staffreports dated 16 April 1992 (Attachment 1, copied in green) and 31 May 1989 (Attachment 2, copied in yellow) contain complete background on the site and the previous requests. , . In both instances the Planning Commission had made negative recommendations to the City Council-and both times the applicant withdrew his request before-a decision could be made-- by the City Council/ ,~~-_. As indicated in Mr. Pyle's current-request letter, dated 5 March 1993 (Exhibit B, attached), his-plans have_again been modified to address concerns previously raised by the City. Nevertheless the -application still includes parking requirement variances as follows: . Aisle width variance - rear parallel parking - 22' required, 15' proposed . Setback variance - northerly driveway to intersection ~60'required, 10' proposed. . . Setback variance- front parking - 15' required, 5' proposed '/ A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5E Re: Vine Hill Market C. U.P. and Variances 1 April 1993 Exhibit C illustrates the existing site layout. The applicant's proposed site plan is shown on Exhibit D. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Exhibit E contains the section of the City Code (1201.21 Subd. 4.c.) which sets forth conditions for motor ftiel operations. Section 1201.05 Subd. 2. should also be reviewed with respect to the criteria for granting variances. Following are issues which need to be addressed as part of this request: . A. There is still a discrepancy as to where the .east line:of the subject property is located. Although the legal description of the property extends to the centerline of Vine Hill Road, a line shows up on the survey 33 feet west of the street centerline. This is consistent with the Hennepin County half-section maps which show a 66-foot r.o.w. for Vine Hill Road. The applicant's surveyor is re$earching this issue further and hopefully more will be known by the Planning Commission's hearing on Tuesday. The answer is important because the property line location is the basis for setback measurements. If the surveyor can not explain what the line on the survey indicates, the applicant. should be required to obtain a title opinion for the property. . . B. . The grade problem cited in previousieviews is proposed to be resolved by eliminating the front driveway and substantially filling the front of the lot to achieve maximum allowable grade on the parking lot. It should be noted that the proposed grading along the north side results in a 1: 1 slope. This needs to be corrected to a maximum 3: 1 slope" This. can be accomplished in any of three. ways: 1) obtain approval from MNDOT to extend the grade into the Highway 7 r.o.w;; 2) construct a retaining wall; or 3) ~ncrease the setback for the parking lot. C. As shown on Exhibit D the parallel parking at the rear of the. building requires.an aisle width variance. The Code requires nine feet for the parking space and 22 feet for a two-way aisle. The 'site plan provides only a IS-foot aisle. This variance could be eliminated by posting a one-way, do not enter sign at the southeast corner of the building. Site circulation-would th((n be limited to a counterclockwise pattern around. the building. D. The Code requires that curb cuts for commercial sites be located 60 feet. from the . intersection of the street rights-of-way, in this case Highway 7 and VinelIilrRoad. The Highway 7 r.o.w. clips off the corner of the subject site, resulting in an unusual lot configuration. As a consequence the northerly driveway is only! 10 feet from the Highway 7 r.o.W. - 2 - Re: Vine Hill Market C.U.P. and Variances 1 April 1993 ' This variance is easily justified, partly due to the configuration of the r.o.w. but also because considerable improvement is made in reducing the' existing nonconformity of the parking lot. First, the steep driveway on the north side of the lot is eliminated. Further, access on Vine Hill Road is reduced in width from 120 feet, to two defined > driveways, 32 feet and 22 feet in width. The space between the Vine Hill Road curb cuts will be landscaped. ' . . E. There does not appear to be justification for the setback variance for the parking in front of the site. Complying with the setback, however, eliminates the four parking spaces on the north end of the site: A variance to the number of spaces is not justified and either variance would establish a poor precedent. / If the City feels the applicant's request h;s'merit, a Zoning Ordinance 'text amendment should be considered which reduces the parking requirement for convenience grocery stores with' gas pumps. It is considered extremely important that .. adequate parking be provided so as to avoid anyon-street parking or congestion on the public streets. ' RECOMMENDATION The applicant's plans have tome a long way since his first proposal. Elimination of the steep driveway, reduction of parking lot grade and confining access on Vine Hill Road to two driveways are'considered to be substantial improvements. ' . As mentioned in the preceding analysis, one of the'variances can be eliminated by restricting circulation to one-way behind the building. The curb cut variance is considered justified due to unusuallotc'onfiguration. ,Neither a setback variance for the parking or a variance for the number of spaces is just1fied. The site is simply too small to comply with the current Code. .. This leaves the, option of amending theCqde to require fewer spaces for convenience'stores with gas pumps. If the City is agreeable and the, applicantwishes topurs~e a text ...... '., amendment, the C.U.P.and variance request should be tabled until an amendment can be considered. '~ Any approval should be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal. cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Tim Keane" Jim Pyle - 3 - ~~~=.:~-- := .a-us 121 , . ~ , <> .. , "" 0:" .. ~ C> ~ ,," '" ..... ~l ..,10 '" Z ~\ I I 2 ~ '" (3'1) 284% It 1 . ~'3 0' ~ : ;;: 11247 ;H48-E ;.."': ..,:;: (:<~~ ~\~ ~2 III I I I Ql ;l "I, ()l i8 3~.; - I::! ( I" Lot F2.. ill.::L, I '''I'~ .ll< · ~ -: ,,"' . ,:;,... 1\~7 \"1 ~ \! "0:: 1 ~ HilL:: E :. ~ ':' ; , ~ r'--Li.1 · : I .. tiN :"..: ~~' = 8 ;J ..:t :t' .. .. T IZ 'a'r .~ , ",~... .r...'" ~ ... '^ ,.. <:1- - ~ ""'~ Ii .... '" .:;: If ::; on '" .... .~ '0 ..J '0 g ~ -f ;t - ~ ~'I .e.. 9 u; ... o ., , \. "J C\J (21 ,. 0.::: t: i'- <> ~ ~ !--: '0 q ,/I (;) 0 \"\' g <::) z... ~ r<; \b 01) I ~' '-= ~ .5)~\J \,..... uJ Cf) . "< /' .. ./ ,A, '<.' \ .... Not'"tn (?) (4) - J . f', '.)...I~"V (::-' Yo .. ~ '. --- --- ::S'Zo5 (?) ~ ...:D J.JoJ ~~7::;---.- , .4 ~. J ) J I /11(,0 (>'1) , . /~7D (5$) -,.(.,0_ :J oJ - "' p.; ~. .....00 ''':9.' II "d>. I ~ u.' 2b 40,02 ..fe's. -.... - Exhibit A ' SITE LOCATION d Variances . H'll Market - C.D.P. an Vme 1 ( VINE HILL MARKET 19215 H\-IY 7 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SHOREWOOD C/O BRAD NIELSEN, CITY PLANNER 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 RE: C.U.P. VINE HILL MARKET MARCH 5, 1993 Gentlemeri: . This is my third application to the City for adding self- serve fuel pumps to my location. Unlike the two previous plans that did not address the slope of my property, this plan presents a major new look to the site. The plan does contain a request for a variance in that it shows 4 parking spaces in a 5' set-back on the front prop- erty line and the code calls for a 15' set-back. I under- stand variances must be looked at closely. I hope that you do look closely since this variance does not impact any res- idential or commercial property. First of all, the property line is about 30' from the two lane frontage road. After the frontage road, there is a four lane divided highway. If a variance had an impact on adjoining property, I could un- derstand a hesitation to grant that variance, but a variance that impacts only roads should be looked at with a little more leniency. . I have also been asked again to state a hardship that would justify a variance. I feel the real hardship is that city codes do not allow the areas around gas pumps to be included as actual parking spaces. It is true that your city codes reflect most other municipalities in not allowing spaces around gas pumps as parking spaces (Except Excelsior which does allow some credit around pumps: Zone B-5 S.1087'). The fact'of the matter is the real life situation that exists at self-serve gas stations. I have fueled at many places where signs are posted that request that gas is paid for before a car is moved away from the pumps. Logic dictates that the pavement around a gas pump can be construed as parking space. Rather than spending additional monies for an amendment change, the granting of the variance as previously mentioned would give me the necessary parking spaces. It would then allow me to improve my site and offer another service for my neighborhood customers, many of whom have requested fuel ser- vice and many of whom fully support my efforts to add fuel service. Si cerely Yours~ . L---' - ames Pyle, own, Vine Hill Market Exhibit B APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER Dated 5 March 93 . . l?~ ..sa... --Q L o lJ) c:> ~....;. ~ .s;. ~ ~ ~ 2 EX ISTlNG BUILDING ~~ ~-s <::::t :iCb -.-s ~~ ~~ ~ f\) C) ....) tP i ~ S> .5) Ii'" +.} . : I ;Z:. ~- oul .".uJ ~o vJo ~I pl' '" ~ c1> ~~9 " :-i o :!:::g>n; ......,,~A. I>.g"!}! ... rt ~... If QOIIIO-< ~tGgi~ ........04 ~ u.... _If "'~'8 !}rt", Hio......... GO :,g~~.!1 " o!i- .. 0 . Xi .. "" (t 0 H}::gl'. grt...~=o ."'20. ~ 0 ~.",rt . I>..il I: B::: .U:'..:>~i H gli'''l>. .. tt. rt a. ~ 0~:::1 g.;;:>[ . "rt 00li' =rf~rt: " ... 1>.0" ............ .... 0 ~n~G~ .:1~~~ ol(..n. ....... "'... '" o ... ... ~ ... ~ .... I>. : q [ '0 0,-1 1'5 G UT ~~ . ~~ '" U~ sg "'1.. en ~~.. I~' F~ ".. ~~ ..... 0 e.= ..... ~~ ... ;;". h.2 ..... 0 ;;~... .. .... E: l~ !'..~ l 'V ~"ll ~ ~ "!Z .... ~ U ... ~O J' lJ ;;; l~ '<... nO ill ... tt1 ~ a'~ .. IJ=- o;Z ..0 EQ ~~ !l " ..() Ii ~p '.. -. --.. BITUMINOUS w -6 -UT Ul uJ ()J m X () c: 0- :i" lO S ::s Cb :r: - g~~~~i:~gii:'..Gi~~~nl ~ "~,,... .. "".....!"..rt ~ tr.QW....," ~.....::r :ftrn .. < ~. .i-. ....."".,,~~ 1 0 = "~~ 0.. o.""n '" rt: ....I>. G~ "t's ~! t; " .....~~I ...A~.~.~n~~ ~ ~A. . go~~~~"~ ~.~ ~ "< HI::.... ".'<t!nw:>>'g"'c ~ I: -gO."'lJ... 5."'C..~.; Ii' . S"~~..N~~n~O~~~~~. p " G~=~~p."~i.~;"'''~ ..... .~~=-i:~.oo~~f:~~~l ~ ~ O"'!i-C.~~="''''.o~~~~~~ < '" n ....~.... rt ~"....~~::rrt ~ · ".. " ~"."~O 0~.1>. 5 · li~""2i5.0:!.l:":-.il:"l':.p."og " ....a....G~ ..EI:~S!~ ~ ~ "ll" ...I>.....~~. ..~..Gg.= rt ..... 0 . ....00 r.. ~.Q . ~ S' Do "t'I.. tr. ~ .:J"':J!l:s:r. '1 rt rt ~..-n~~1rt~~c.~to~ ~ 0: ~... 0 . ~.~ o~ : .....~.." ":7.~~.:l.:~. n p.~o,,~ ..co p. . ~~" I ~~~g~p..~'" ~I>.~~. ...\;' .g g~ '< !;":. 't'=::: i g III -l =r. It 2 0 0 · .... rt It II Ii rt:l .. .....rt~~.:ortnt'log.o ~rtn. _ :J -. .rtn~ nr"~ 0 -a..... ~.... .en... ....s:.......~o "- .. ~rt.C30~~:~:G~. I:!i".n ~ ~[...;r'<JI::::.. ..,!&!"'l: Ii' n~;.~~~ ~~:i..o~ ! G.G"~!;"~S~~ "":'..~,,,p. ... .::1........ G.... ~.~ ~.O><... ..<,,"'...><.......0 nll::S' O::rIll::tUI1:J.OI....rt . . "p.. ."'.~. o. ..~... p.. ..... -' - _ a ~~ H~ CIl& ~ ,..... t:::::j'-+ ~(j o CIl ~ ""d t"" > Z ~ -I . Ij-'I i r= ~ i~. 11 i [ ! ~ E Ii !;~ 2!"'. if.' i .11 : i I.~ Iii ell ~ ~ I! t i C; il J r ::l i ~ 51 If II I[ I ~! i I . H I ~ fl i:.; h .. ~ ~ J! I . f .- ..uI Ul lQ 00 )> ^' rrt )> II ..... ......... -J f') U1 <C (fI D "Tl :-i '"' t-1 ::s () c c... ::s Ul -<: S' ~ :r: Ul n )0 r;; c; ,-.. i c; ~ <> .... III PI -i l!: ~ .~/9c'1~__./ .rl ~ ; ~ a ~ ~. . ... ~ c: " ~ Q to .. to j' III ^' ~ 0- '-' ICI 2 c... .....", . ; .~.. " i .$>-:. -0 L '0 U1 c:> ~. .- ~ ~ Ul ~ ~ ~ . :r!Jc5'~,---/ . -y-. I ~ ~ ~ a s .. ~ . ... ~. c: lQ . "2 s;>-;:. EX ISTING BUILDING IB' 1 ~~ ......'"1 "=::t: ::!(b -.'"1 ~~ c::: (f)~ c.t::i fb l:) ...) o.P ~ ~ , : I ?=. gg- oul .J;>.uJ ~o 010 ~I [11' ~~9 '.....- --... BITUMINOUS ~RDADWAY Watermai n ~ W Easterly Edge of Bil-uminou5 Roadwa; La" Gasmain ur L Underground Telephone Cables H.lq~: ttfI ! hHli ~ tIll. I !f!Jril tli i Ii!h) 1'1.1 d 1.11i rUB Ilf.', I. q i J t~~ii {lilt; 'fir niP It {.1 ihll w -G -UT oJ oJ "dtr:1 :;:0:>< 08": "dg o~ entj gj en ~ "d ~ > z ~ 'h Il~ I II ~ ~ Ii ~ i h 2! ~I Ii' i .'1 : ~ i~ f' i ~ si 1 1 i 1 t f c; i~ J j i:l i~ i ~ it r ~! i rft ~ n i ~ l .. : t, l> XI f11 )> II - ,,-1 -J ,..:> U1 '" n 1> J;; <> .... ..uI U1 I.P CP <t (j) D " :1 r-.. H ::s () c 0- :J <.0 -<:: S' (1) :c :!: " :-l o ,-... fTl x n c: 0- :s LO <: :::J r1l :c , i ~ ~ .. .0: .. [ F r i c; ~ o ... /II 1'1 -t XI ~ 0.. '-' XI 2 0- '-" , ~; . . ~ I . uJ uJ :g~~g~ l>P~I" E'.~~il~ "~~gj !;" ~.....o,Q \Q ....... .. ... 0 '8 ~,. '" ..a....ogO :.a~~.!1 ,. ..:; .. 0 Gl 2: t11'1l" 0 HI:::a~ g"...~=.. ...go. ::0...." , ",.ll = S ~ ,Uo..gi ...: .. "'. .&..gb:~ . . rt HI . g.......1l !i: p." ..... ~.:;l>l 0,." o"l) !:~": " ... "'0'" II ""... ~ ..... 0 ~~~r:~ o ...~ ~ ~ o:r",n. ........ \D." ...~ ~.. -..:i ,. ~~ ~~~.~~~~~~~~be~ ~ ~~ "0 ".",. ".'" ~o",..! .. '<'1 G.ll :;!'....:i....g"r;gn"...!:; " ..,. ~ .i~~..:..~..~~GJil i ~ == ~..."n~= ,.~3 ~~ !;" ~ ,. ~~~~~ ...~~.~.~n~~ ~ ~~ . go~~~~"~ ~.~ ~ · ~ h~~ ~.~cn~~~~~ ~ ~ ~i:.~r~ ~.~a~.~.~ S . O~~~. w~~n~o~~~~.." " ~e ~~~~~~.Oh~ ~ rt ~ ~ P".....5g CD ......!:;. ~: 1;:TCI'g Ctl'8 Ul w ;~~~I!~~~~:~!l!jli ~ ; ,..... g ~,..."....o 0"&'" , 0 ~~~ 8&o~~~~:~~ ~oo rt i:i:~-~~~:=~!~!~;" e a r;o=!;"...i"~~Oo~b"t1.t1oi ~ G "~.=g~~~"~~~~~G ~ · o:P-p,-.; J .'" ;;;~. ~I:: ~ .....~t1,. ....:?=~..~..:~. n I-' J~~.~~~ ~CO Po CI ~~n ~ ..... "~~g'8,,,..::"" '".;",. . 11 ~... ...t;t. ~ g~lA ~ ;;::.; -t:=::: l g..a'g:r.",sooCln:,.S'Ilt..tt:r II ,g ~rt~~.=oG~~o 0 Porto-. Po ~......''''''~~''''.C4.....~~rt:~.....oo ~ : . ~,.:;"'t1I"J:o""~ ,....g.. 0 !! ~~..... ..... . .~. ~~. ..... "1 ~ g <: ;\''< ..:: :: ." . '" ~ il !' t1: i 11 n...r;..~~=,.~~:"...o~. ! ~.grt~~~~O~ rttta~K · l:' .,& "I .... tr ~....." · ~ ~.~~ o~~~~~~~~~~~ . .. (1'110.. at "'.-<. oa ."J."." OIl 0...- 1il/'IIJI - - - -- - ~ Q .. III Q I' ll! ~ /. ~ 1" ~ J' .5) li" +d ~ v '" '-J 0', 15 G UT .. .. .... a 9... &.g!' "1=... ~... .. a;~ Ot1,. ~"tf 0 ~~ .. ..... "I 1i":7 RE2 ::-~... !'t13 n .... a- rT '<"I n= ~ I!E ..... ~~ ,. ~~ j< ~~ so tT1 tI) I~' p-~ i~ l:z ~O i~ ~z ~O i~ tT1 ~ ;'..... ..Z EO ~ "0 gp I .... ~ ~ .. ." &- ~ '" ~ :;; ill H ------, . . c. ,Gas station, auto repair - minor and tire and battery stores and service, provided that: (1) Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or oil is incidental to the conduct of the use or business, the standards and requirements imposed by this Ordinance for motor fuel stations shall apply. These standards and requirements are, however, in addition to other requirements which are imposed for other uses of the property. (2) The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 'f (3) The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (4) A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be installed. '1 (5) Parking areas and driveways shall be curbed with continuous curbs not less than six inches (6") high above the parking lot or driveway grade. . (6) The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right-of-way and shall be in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 2i of this Ordinance. '1, (7) Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. (8) At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip' of not less than five feet (5') shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 2g of this Ordinance. . (. . (9) Parking or car stacking space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 2g of this Ordinance. (10) Vehicular access points shall create a minimum conflict with through traffic, movement, shall comply with Section 1201.03, subdivision 5g of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (11) All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 11 of this Ordinance. "".,l ~..."",:, j~ I t. (12) Provisiol1s are made to control and reduce noise. . (13) Any outside storage shall be in compliance with subdivision 4d of this Section. . r.-::-.'.... . I .' " I~. (14) All conditions pertammg to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. (15) The provisions of Section 1201.04, subdivision 1d(1) of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 180, 5-19-86) t Exhibit E C.U.P. REQUIREMENTS City Code Sect. 1201.21 Subd. 4.c. / .' - -------~-:-.'>,,~;0;X; /~~~~::~~~:-' "'" .,/ .,/ , "4;~ . , :/ "r'"..//".. _A' "..-:>:;/' I ___,/Jj), I / ., . . I\''\. ,'\< ~........... .' / /' // /7" / ~-- ..' / ,./ "", L----, ,/' ../ . / :\"r . " .. // ,/'" f' . ,., .. '~" / '. "Ill ". ._..../. ...,' ~. , ! ~1i"t, .'~~ \' ~. ~ ..*, \. rs I '1." ~ I j Ii ... :c /'l ./~/~ - /' /' / ~7", (..JJ ~a;~. t;t.:r;"IN""bV',''-l.. .:;;;'-:W" / . . (r.r:., j<:..E':(:1ir-;a.1II) . . -,:2;.'J/. ":1'1 . ..- / l' I \.ect? A& HtiElI'1!. . ./~V^" . (\. t' \'t ;o~ ......' L~~ ~J I: I I .J. ; '7! I I 'i. / /~_. ,.~. . "- , ._..._.---'-"ltI-- -j-.. ...,. --'~" ....---) '-"", / ~.----- -- ill '~l ::/"\ . ...........1L'V.i:\.i"1 MJ_: _ :::-~~-A:...4J. S~,~M "'. . ~ e:tlOwt.K~{ ~ ? '.: ~\s,. .....-"" . , .. . .._~__..~__.__4...--._-_. .--- ; .'",~J ", I, . , ~ 4. W/'?W...a-:. .J~I " "'. '. \ ~ \ \ ; I i ____-41- rr~l.. snr~ (>1~) I ,,--- :~" ' ..~ . . , ..-,,/ I .,/." I ! _,=,'~~^...,(-r:--~-;' "./ '~-"'-. ----- '- 1t'Z- -.... . i ~~.I- I ,'/ I. ,/ . / j/ /", ,-'-'-"Z.AY.J. ~t'1l"e,o.. ; :In --4-,t1W~:-( M\.4/11iF' ilf,' HIi'tf'i~ I Nt, n:::.. f!.>r.Ll Ii;. ,I .. -. ""--r-- I, rM'(.(.'K k.i\ ~ rt--~ ....-- z../-o.'N .:5nr-EA '-_'('~.l'J" - .-.', ,,- ~.c.:'~~~~~ '. --'':f''! '---'~Rlt:H-,..(.tt~1 "I'f.,W{//tf.'K.J'Jt-U~' ~ ~ I~I '\ fO("A\..'tT,:', (~()),t"'l; fI,+r'f1--:'1 w \ .J I /. , '. .. /I. " '. i Ii I I I I I 1 I .I[]'~\ I \" --- - ....--..- .. . 'On ________.- . " '" ~ .'j.- ~. '1"'" . _ - '-'_ e (-!T~ ~...;. (~.;.('.F1 .. , -;- ---~~ I-,~:,........,,<. '."'" . (' f '. ~J-aJ.'VL.:(}.!I- <<H.t , -._._~:--~ N~;; - - ~r-t.~ ~ ~-ffq-"\.-E.V, ~.. - ..--.=.....:...-. '-_._-'-..:..::.=-;:-.:..~ - ~ t4-rAI4~ ~S (~~.111 t') ~ ~, 'Tl!:~~~ ~"!~ ~~ ~ .... Exhibit F PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ,1 ......., ---- .. (?"'c :- ..., MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY . Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD ,- 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Plailliing 'Commission, Mayor and City Council "- ~FROM: Brad Nielsen -~ ' . RE: 16 April 1992 ,} \ Ne.. ~ \ \...l.. v\""ff~-r ~kiflper~tte - C.U.P. for Gas Pumps and Variance to Parking Requirements DATE: FILE NO.: 405 (92.07) BACKGROUND Mr. James Pyle, owner of the Skipperette store located at 19215 State Highway 7 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), is requesting a conditional use permit to install gas pumps on his site. He also requests variances for the number of parking spaces required and to the setback requirements for parking spaces. . , .. A staff report, dated 31 May 1989, prepared for a similar request by Mr. Pyle provides complete backgr,!und on the site (see attachment; copied in yellow). ,Having received 'a negative recommendation fromihe Plarining: Commission at that time, he withdrew his ' _ application before it ever went to the CitY Council. ~ - ".::- . - .. . The current proposal differs from the previous one in that the gas pumps are located on the west side of the building and no overhead canopy is proposed. Other differences_ will be- - discussed further on in this report. . A number of the issues raiSed in'the 1989 report re~~ unr~solved ~th this latest proposal. At the same time, the applicant proposes certain improvements which. increase the conformity of the site. -' -, ...... _.' ','i;- "', '- A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's 5c Attachment 1 (~ r ." Re: Skipperette - C. U.P. 16 Apri11992 A. R.O.W. Discrepancy. These is a question as to where the easterly boundary of the property is located (he shows the centerline of Vine Hill Road, whereas the County half-section maps show 33 feet of r.o.w.). This impacts the measurement of setbacks. For purposes of this report, setbacks will be measured from the traveled surface of the street. If the applicant objects to this determinaiton, he should provide a title opinion from his attorney which proves where the property line exists. B. Conditional Use Permit. The applicant's plan reduces the number of variances proposed in his 1989 request. However, the following variances still remain: . 1. Setbacks. - Spaces 1 - 3 are located five feet from the front property line. Fifteen feet is the minimum setback. It should be noted that the new plan eliminates paving which currently encroaches into the right-of-way. - 2. Number of Spaces. The Code requires 13 spaces for the proposed use. Including the spaces which encroach into the setback area, he shows nine spaces. The applicant asks that the spaces at the pump be allowed to be counted as parking spaces. Shorewood's Ordinance does not allow this, but there are some- indications that our requirements may be outdated with respect to convenience store parking. Staff will research- this item further and report on it at the hearing. . 3 . Use of Required Parking Area. The Code states that required parking spaces must be used exclusively for parking. This issue is raised because little room is provided on site for storage of snow. As such, snow tends to get piled in spaces provided for parking. If approved, the C.U.P. should specifically state that required parking spaces will remain open for customer parlpng; Similarly, parking space is not to be used for sale of used cars. 4. Parking/Driveway Grade. One of the most significant problems with the previous proposal and this one, is the grade" of the parking lot, especially-the northerly driveway. The Code limits the grade to a maximum of five percent. The grade on the subject property is closer to 10 percent. Both-the City Engineer and Fire Marshal have cited this as a serious problem. If the Planning Commission feels the applicant's plan has merit, - the application should be tabled until he provides a detailed grading plan showing existing and proposed contours. This plan' must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. The plan should also address how drainage will be handled. - 5. Circulation. The Fire Marshal should be asked to comment on the 10 foot aisle width proposed for the gas pump lanes. - 2 - . .- ,,", ~.'.- r '. '.~ ,. Re: Skipperette - C.U.P. 16 April 1992 . " ,- I .: 6. Landscaping. The east 15 feet of the site will be landscaped with unspecified Ifdeciduousshrubberylf~ Any approval of the C.U;P. should be subject to a . detailed landscape plan prepartXi by a landscape architect. PropostXi plantings should be resistant to. snow and road salt. ;> 7. Signage Plan. None ha~ been submitted., , RECOMMENDATION . . . . Although the revised plan is substantially improved over the 1989 proposal, variances have not been eliminated entirely. The parking setback. and driveway grade variances raise serious concerns. Similar.to the 1989 application, the applicant has not demonstrated what hardship exists - that he is unable to make reasonable use of his property without them. If, however, the City feels the plan has merit, the application should be tabled pending review of detailed grading and landscaping plans. ' BJN:ph" ( cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel Craig Jordan James Pyle , )' , ~, . \:. \, - ! / _\ r, '" - 3 - ! "-- " ., ., :~48E 405,90 t8 4. :a :~.. .;, 11. I~" ;0 /I' I I I Qi ;J t; "I c> N ,~I,,, 1LSl I" I" Lot I:!...IiO.,. --, I (-- It I . . '" J,. ~ ~ '" ~ .... :" c> ~ Z ~) 2 'Z84.S6 It 1 . ~~3.0' .A'. : ". II~ 47 :iHa-E -~ -.. ~"'~ 1,\\ . '.....-;~ \.:4 ,...~ .... .. .... .... ... 'c> '" ::; 'l:P .,.; '" ... ~ r:3'1) 1 12 ~ ~~ - -:;---- ~, : .~, ,.., ~\.... -\----- "! "I' .."SO ~ 1.'1~.<s z lit \ .:~" \\; -\-A i'" \.{ ~ \" ~ J ~ \ <1'\) ~ l{:~ ~ (!V1 13 \ t!:'" ~ \ \ \ ~l I I 2 <> ...I 00 ,.. i:: .1 ~ ~ll.e.. x III .... o . {'\J ("\.! 0:: j"-- ~) r-: t. Y () r0 U lI.J if) \ ...... No...th l?) l4) .- I . {', ;:).,J""V (:'\ .... .. ;: '. .# ) ~.:, J /11' () .. (S'1) ~) ~ .,,'0 ).j;J 3~-;;: :;-......- .., . -;7;5----:. IIJ 1 D (5V 5:.l:..0 '" d'l ~ :J>. "" .,.... "..... ...,;;. II I ~ I ~. ( Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Skipperette - C.U.P. and Variances ..... Z~ 40.0Z .fes, __n - , . /$ ..-"';1/ :;/ /'/ A /' ./ # /" ~ ?' ~/ V V' ~ V ": -I.:: . - ~ ~/ <P' t-~. fl.O (!,t. o.~-1 t1. ~~ . . ...1<- . , .. tJorth , I" :' Z-o .'~ . "i\t.".:. . f." 01\1. ..~ ". *:<. ./ ;/ ~. t .,----.... .' ,~.: -... I . . . ,i 1: c..a--\tl4:r~,.,. ~oro'::EO t\J\l.'O\ N.c.. " ".' i",: (OuE E"l'- \~i It-\c.. ,. or ~"bI'I\"'L _1- - ... -r, :. . . ":', . .,\ 11f:>I-rd.il '. ,. 'fl.I' II.;-It' j . . ". J. I '..;+, ~. '. . "H7:~::~ ( " :. ... . ~, '. ::::;;r: ;' ....)-,. ~~ r ' ') "'~ . ~.~ ~' :' . 1J1(~~J:.'...:...li , : I . . J~I '.\ ~~~) II \'.~.~ " ~.~'r,\" 'I C/) .. I, .~ ,_ 'I! Cv i' (') ij (}.Ii I~Y.\l ) . _I) I , '(:,. ./. .>., V '-'r ~~~ . . '. . ,'i .' . : ~~ ,. y -- 'c,~;;;:" ;,:':,',..--:'. .,. , ., .; ;,i ;" ~" ... , -.:: , . ;~ : . ;'j' ,'.:;.; LCW '. I L . .\ .'. . 1 ;~:)~';.;'~ft ,. ,.::J i' :;i.'7':': . ~. ;1'. . >. . . " '. ~ ~!' , .' ,', t , ~ I ~. l C~"1'1' 10 cC o II: :j i .. z ~ r~H:'~~~)'" : ',.,: '-" . " l,!,::.( I...., '. I r;:;r;-;)...~. .'...., 1_' 'I.' ~ ' . I?";; .q ".. ..~. ~. ~; / , :;;;i.r. i ;i:'~., ~. :'~:;~:~:1"> IH \ .:~~.: '. ~~~'~'.' ":.: . Jl:fi::, if .. .., , . "".',:,' ~l::'!'!' :.l,,~.':.; !;~~}). :~::;: V \,: '. i :--:;h>~7 '" I """~iJ ., ~,.~ . . I I I . , . ..... i , I . .' ~;.1 I . ':., '......';/ i. '.i. ."~1, ", a ~I :'.,':-' ,'1.' .\.:;"\~- :'~'i"~~:' :, ". t .. . " " '1:. !' ~. . . I /' l':-'!',:i? ~. .' . . ::. .. . ro. >;",:. ...~... .l,' ,~.. : ": ;~J;~.~ . . . 1 >;;'ltl..: - i 1'. . I'.~.:.' .' --r'--' ", '. ~ . ,"'.\ Exhibit B D SITE PLAN PROPOSE . . . /-, ( c' FILE COpy March 10, 1992 Attn: Brad Nielsen city of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 APR \ 3 \992. Reference: Legal Notice, Skipperette Grocery to add fuel pumps. Gentlemen: This letter is to express my opposition to the referenced proposal. There are gas stations on either side of the Skipperette Grocery (approx. 2 miles) and the addition of another gas station would not, in my opinion, benefit the community. The cost, in terms of environmental hazards (fuel spills, leaking tanks, battery acid, antifreeze, and other noxious chemicals associated with gas stations) far outweigh the benefits of another gas station, if any. Thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns. Sincerely, ~~~ Martin R. Wellens ~ 4755 Lakeway Terrace Shorewood, MN 55331 '. , , 470-9395 ,', Exhibit C . RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE . , (- p, l FILE COpy .' 5117 Vine Hill Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 APR I 4 1992 Brad Nielsen Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: P.I.N. 25-117-23-41-0028 Request for Conditional Use Permit by Mr. James Pyle, 19215 State Highway 7, Shorewood Dear Mr. Nielsen: . I am providing the following comments in response to the notice of a public hearing for the Planning Commission to consider a request for a conditional use permit by Mr. James Pyle, owner of the Skipperette grocery store. I am the owner and I reside in a home located at 5117 Vine Hill Road, Minnetonka, which is located diagonally across the street from the Skipperette store. Following are my points against the granting of a conditional use permit for the installation of fuel dispensers at the site. · Traffic and ingress-egress to the store now causes problems for adjacent property owners. Increasing traffic volumes by having fuel dispens~rs would compound the existing situation. . Some of the users of the grocery cause litter problems on my property, and adjacent properties. The litter problem occurs on a daily basis. I am concerned that the installation of fuel dispensers with the associated waste products generated by self-service or full-service fuel stations, will increase the amount of litter that iI~.pacts adjacent properties including my pwperty. . . . The site appears to be poorly designed for placement of fuel dispensers. It appears that placement of dispensers will encroach on property lines regardless of , location. . The site has a steep slope in the front parking area, thereby increasing vehicle safety concerns and environmental concerns for run-off of any spilled fuel. Air emissions from fuel dispensing may be an environmental and health concern. Benzene, a component of gasoline, is a suspected carcinogen: . Placement of fuel dispensers on the property will change its use and probably have a negative impact on adjacent property values, especially residential property along Vine Hill Road. Exhibit D I RESIDENT CORFR~P01jWENCE .' . . (- ~ (. .. .. '. . Increased lighting for the fuel dispensers will detract from the residential prGperties along Vine Hill Road. . Granting the requested permits will change the use, and may cause additional changes for use of the prop.erty. The property is currently used by private individuals to park vehicles which are marked "for sale". If vehicle storage,. additional parking were permitted, it may have an adverse value impact on adjacent residential properties. . Several fuel service stations already e?<ist along Highway 7, providing service to users of the area. I appreciate the opportunity to present my position on this issue. Sincerely, _ ~. ~- . ~ Craig L. Johanesen ~ --- cc: Bill Hise, Minnetonka City Council . . '. f/'- \ r-' .. MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Wanen CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORM1DUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE : 31 MAY 1989 '. RE: SKIPPERETTE - C.U.P. AND VARIANCE FOR MOTOR FUEL SALES FILE NO.: 405 (89.18) BACKGROUND The attorney for James Pyle has requested a conditional use permit and variances to add motor fuel sales to the Skipperette convenience grocery store, located at 19215 State Highway 7 (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) . . The property is zoned C-3, General Commercial and contains approximately 17,725 square feet of area. (Note: The area of the site may only be 13,598, depending on the extent of r.o.w. for Vine Hill Road). Land use and zoning surrounding the property are as follows: north: S.T.H. 7 then commercial in Deephaven east: Vine Hill Road then si~gle-family"residential in Minnetonka, zoned residential south: parking for adjo~ning offi~e, zoned C-3 west: office building, . zoned C-3.- The existing store measures 42' x 50' and contains 2100 square feet of floor area. The applicant proposes "to add two gas pump islands covered by a 24' x 44 ' canopy. The site has acces s to both Vine Hill Road on the eas t and the Highway 7 service road on the north. Access on Vine Hill Road is poorly defined with approximately 110 feet of the site opening onto the street. The ap.plicant proposes to replace five parking spaces on the north side of the building and six spaces on the east side with three angled stalls on the west side of the property, four parallel stalls on the south side and three parallel stalls on the east side of the building (see Exhibit B). Circulation is proposed to be one-way, counterclockwise around the building. In attempt to comply with current zoning requirements the applicant has reduced the access to Vine Hill Road to a 25 foot driveway opening on the east side of the building. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's , Attachment 2 - /~ " Re: Skipperette C.U.P. and Variances 31 May 1989 As stated in the request letter (Exhibit C). dated 19 May 1989. the applicant's attorney feels that only one variance is needed. for the number of parking spaces required. The Zoning Ordinance requires 13 spaces. while the applicant proposes 10. As will be pointed out further on in this report. other variances are also necessary. ISSL~S AND ANALYSIS Based upon a review of the proposed site plan and pertinent- sections of Shorewood's City Code. several issues have been raised. many of which are illustrated on Exhibit D. . A. Vine Hill Road R.O.W. Discrepancy. The proposed site plan has been based upon a metes and bounds legal description of the property which describes the site as extending to the centerline of Vine Hill Road. The Hennepin County half-section maps show a full 66-foot right-of-way for Vine Hill Road (see Exhibit A). and a 1988 survey provided by the applicant shows a 33-foot road easement for Vine Hill Road. Nevertheless the applicant's attorney advises that no record exists of any r.o.w. or easement having ever been dedicated. This report has been based upon the applicant's attorney's opinion. giving the applicant the benefit of the doubt. However, the location of the road r.o.w. (or easement). or the lack thereof. has serious ramifications relative to the proposed use. For example the proposed canopy. let alone the existing building. would not comply with setback requirements. If the City is inclined to approve this request. it is recommended that the matter first be referred to the City Attorney for his legal opinion as to how the r.o.w. discrepancy should be resolved. . B. Conditional Use Permit. Section 1201.21 Subd. 4.c. c6ntains specific requirements for gas stations. At least five of the 15 conditions listed therein (mostly related to parking and circulation) raise serious questions relative to tne ~pprov~l of the C.U.P. (Note: Items marked with an asterisk (*) require variances to Shorewood's zoning requirements) . 1. The existing site is grossly substandard in terms of parking lot setbacks. The Code requires a minimum 15 foot setback from the property line. The present parking lot extends to the pa~ed surface of Vine Hill Road and encroaches into the frontage road r.o.w.* (shown shaded on Exhibit D). These nonconformities should be corrected at the time concrete curbing "is installed at the perimeter of the parking lot (Sect. 1201.21 Subd. 4.c. (5)). The applicant shows only a five foot setback* between the paved surface of Vine Hill Road and his proposed parking lot. As shown on Exhibit D the fifteen foot setback restricts what is already a poorly configured parking and circulation system. - 2 - /-----' i \ r- .' Re: Skipperette C.U.P. and variances 31 May 1989 2. The Code requires 13 parking spaces based upon the following: T motor fuel station 4 spaces - convenience grocery: 1 space per 200 square feet of net floor area (2100 - 10% = 1890 ~ 200 = 9.45) 9 " total = 13 " The applicant proposes 10 spaces*. one of which (U3) can not be counted because it is within the setback area*. and two of which (U1 & 2). if allowed. conflict with ingress and egress at the easterly driveway. It should be realized that whether or not these spaces are allowed. people will have a tendency to park there simply out of convenience. . The remaining seven spaces are served by a narrow. one-way circulation system. The three spaces on the west edge of the site are at severe angles and parking is required to overhang into the five-foot setback area*. The remaining parallel spaces are considered poor design for a convenience store. It is likely that rather than observing the one-way pattern or having to parallel park. people will park north of the canopy. or possibly in front of the building. interfering with motor fuel operations and circulation. The one-way system. as proposed. will result in vehicular conflict at the Vine Hill Road driveway. Traffic entering the site from Vine Hill Road can not be allowed to turn left to the rear of the site because there is inadequate room to turn around or for two cars to pass one another. I t will be difficul t to discour'age such movements even with "do not enter" signage. Even channelizing the driveway may create confusion or conflict. . 3. While the five-foot strips' along the west and south sides of the site meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. they are inadequate for snow storage. While some space exists along the northeasterly edge of the site._ piling snow there may adversely affect circulation. (Sect.: 12pl. 03 ~p.bd. 5. g.) 4. The Zoning Ordinance limits parking lot grades to 5%. The grade shown on the applicant's grading plan is twice that steep in two locations. The entry from the service road and the pump island area are shown as 10%*. If the City considers approving the request it should be subject to the City Engineer's approval of grading and drainage. The Fire Marshall also has serious concerns about the potential for fuel spills ending up in the stC?rm sewer. (Sect. 1201.03 Subd. 5.d.(8)(i)) 5. Sections 1201.21 Subd. 4.c. (8) and (9) require screening and landscaping from abutting residential zoning districts. The landscaping shown on the applicant's site plan is poorly located. ineffective for screening* and does not comply with Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.g. The proposed berm is three feet high in only a five-foot space. The strip would have to be 18 feet wide to accommodate the - 3 - . . r- Re: Skipperette C.U.P. and Variance 31 May 1989 required 1:3 slope. Furthermore, if snowplows don't destroy the shru~s, which are less than three feet from the curb, the snow stored on them Will. The proposed berm and shrubbery also create a visibility hazard at the easterly driveway. Given the lack of green space and the insufficient (possibly nonexistent) boulevard, it is questionable whether effective screening can be accomplished on this site. 6. No handicapped parking or access ramp has been provided. 7. No plans for signage have been provided. Since gas stations have a tendency to display many signs, this issue should be addressed as part of the C.U.P. rather than as a separate sign permit. C. Variances. In addition to the variance referenced in the applicant's request letter, six other variances have been identified in the preceding section. The request letter seems to justify the variances on the basis of some "community service" - the applicant's elimination of the video game arcade. It fails, however, to demonstrate what hardship exists which keeps the applicant from making reasonable use of the property. Is not the existing convenience store, which was nearly doubled in size by the previous owner, a reasonable use ofa commercial site? Furthermore, it could be speculated that the previous owner's expansion of the building adversely affected the future installation of gas facilities. The statutory criteria for variances specifically state that the plight of the landowner can not have been created by the landowner. Conveyance of property does not waive or diminish thi~ requirement. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding analysis, little more needs to be said. Simply put, the applicant is trying to fit too much on a site that won't accommodate it. Remember that the issues raised herein are based on the ~ine Hill Road curb being the applicant's property line. If, as suggested by the applicant's survey, r.o.w. or easement does exist, these issues are greatly compounded. It is therefore suggested:that the planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council should be to deny the request for a C.U.P. and variances. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Jim Norton James Pyle James Robin Mike Eicher - 4 - ../ ;~}~L~,90 IH.U ':" ~ @ I I !845' 111 . ~93 0' ~_ 11147 :3l4S"E -'" :.. ~"'~ 1,\1 <~~ \:4 ...~ 'i~~ ~ . i ,1~.J ~ Lot 29 , ~ ~ 0-' 3: o .... ~~ ""0 Z .-...... Z~';3. 58 Re~I" ~ :l..';; _ JJ, II' I /41....).' I I ~l ;I ~ "I N ~) ~) ~ ~!...31~ r I~ Lot F' ,10.1. ---, ~ III ,'" <> on .. ~ N '0 ~ on If ,... '{iI 0:- N 0 on N '" .... (; oJ Q j' II:. (.oJ ~) l;l (fJJ) Pa,t at Lot 26 ,.J. '\ ... Not'tn .... Z~40.OZ.Ift:!s.""'''- .. ~. - 1'; ,.;-, ,: ~ ~\;l-' i.~~.'~ ~~;. (\~ J .;::. 6 1 ~I..HILL~ ~ "~.l-""'''':'. 5 ,:1'. .1 .4 : '1110 : Q~ E 8 -= ~ ::t . .~ .\' . . \0 - - - 1 .. .. u:J - ~ 2: ... ..... '. ,,~7 "'. \,,~... m) .~ '2 ~ ~ ~ _1 ;::: ~ ~ ",.;r-;~ ..,.;r~\ -~iT.r--z; \ ~ . ~~" \\".\- A.,- ~ ... . ~ \ :l \ <1"') (1.v. 13\ f1.~ \ \ \ ( f ~ z.o -'. I .... ~ g;: -{ ~S'l , o X III lL o .. ~ .., , - . \. 'J C'J 0::: iii ~ '0 () C:i ~ \0 ~ i'- r-: o r<) , , ....../ l.lJ U) a: u (-,G) - ... 2 ; 1?) ~) )~~{) .... ... ;:' ------- .. -;-i:5----:.. ~) 5;:j() ~----- ~"4.'1 .,~ /17&. () 5~\:.O.. ( S'1) 1~7D ~- ... (51) . "3>- . ....eo ""0>_ II I ~ ! I I~' I , j '.~~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION ~ Skipperette - C.U.P. and Variances ) ( -! ~- I ~ 07.; ., l~ ..,10 ;"'1 J~ -. :; .. r: ~~ ::; ;: OD"' '"tl \-'. 00' U1 \-'. ~rt to U1 H ~ tQ ~ l' I J / .I '''0 )> :u 7\ Z " , . i' ~ r. r" :-, r I -'-1 J J I I I " .. '" '" Z "I )< .:: e ~ r; .. ~.----j II .(., rf) , I "I r IJ~ B (l~ (9 ~ fit /:- h"':! )' (,-- . . o "TI "TI o (11 III c: r o z " \ 1-" I: n ~ U Tl . . I .\ I \ \ 1 I / ., li =I ,". ._ __.. '........ __00_____. - - -~ . .// , ''j~~ -lJ~ -l~~' ~~"-\-\~~\ ,_.r/ \ I ,0 I ..... 0 I , \ \ \ ','. \' I \ ," " 'I \~ \" ' \'\ 0 '1'.1 0 ~ Il \ '< ' .\" '., , I '\ II \ "I \ \ . .~~\ ..." '... L \ L 'L I \ \ . ..~' .!D,J .J.L .lI \,' ~ ' t.- -, .~ \ \ "J~ ' tJ' ~inl\ \,' ',' , ,_, \ I ,,' ','. '~: ' ,~\. ~'[[~J' III \~~ \ '\ \,." " .\ I'... '\,' .. ;s - - ,{ . '\ ' , . · v '- \' 4, ',~~-lt \ i' ~ . " ,,\, \~ TI-' I ' \ \ \ .. \ ' \ \ I... I~ \ \ , I '\ I' \ mrtJl1ft \ \': \ ,:I~ l . I' \ II JJ.~till-:\ \\/,,~'.. ~('i . ~'tO:J1' I ,... ... , .' I " " \ ~"'" , l'I.J . . . i' I: , 1.0/ VI . .,:.:...:-:.:.::,:~" '. ..1 1-- /rj-I--::-', '\ \ ~I : lie I .P I 1 / ,I' , \ 6 1 G 1// I I \ ... \ -1- 1 I , I ,1 I \ " , I 1 I ' , I I ' It "'", I - .. . I ... --. -)- I / I I I \ .' 1 0 .07'1 I I I '\ ',' ~ .-~_-~o~-'l-~'~~: .~~_. rj -'=Jj-_-eq.:9:~)~---~~_~~~ ~J' .' _.", I ,.,l\ ~~ ". ':~':~L ~; ')-6r::';;-~'C", 31:~r)""" ~'~'0n'(-')/'~ ",1'1 o~~- ,_.___. .. /''- r ..' '..' -'...... -~", ..1_1,-, _' ,v- , \ ---~~~/ // ~~ [~ \ IT .., C , - ~. I (- t~, ,/ r'~'~' ,r- '-' / " , u / .;g \ -. /-'0.""'-- ' \ ' \-./~-_._--- ;.~r ;;, ~[J z;:' ?Z,,. r' . BO c; r-;o; if ~::: .-.-...-.'" r1 rl ~ 1. -I ~i 7- t' -- -..--.:... 1 --rt, IO.lr.'-- lJ' . ..-: ~r."', ..:...,.....~- " Cj)).... ..... ..... " ..... ..... ... 1'1 It.'t ^Vfll<~ ~J3NC 'Z~ if 7. t: .," I UI LJ UJ -I I 0 -" :u I~ .1" UJ '7\ =ii 111 "0 >< m (j; :u j. m z ::: C> m ,', ./ ...._-......... t. '\, ~. " \ \ 0(\ ~ ( '. .... " (iI~ 11 o "a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C) :JJ '" '" z .. '" '" .. .'~ ,..../' ......... ,,': f-- ---.., N ... --___ ...- Z - c::..-===---, ~ , VINE HILL ROAD 17, p....'1I~f"1~ 1 ~n .~(tl f'1 () Ill" d "'l Z"tl:cZ, C"'~7.~1 3rJ2~ '1 I" c. " r. -j () 7, t ~;~. ~! LI t ,. l 7.. I"[:r.' v" .1 .-0(:;--__, ^-'& ....... -.-.......... c," " -..... ~ '" .~ " ......... '" ' ~."""" ........~ ,,'" /-4 ">.:& -4 -;1"'-;;7. . l; '='.' =1 .l,~" r";l. .. '.J ':I~. -r:'0 1'-f1~ r ~ f:'# y c: '. OJ! f J' if -r v..' ,,) ROBIN B THOMPSON. P.A. ATTORNe:VS AT ~w May 19, 1989 . Brad Nielsen City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: James pylejSkipperette Dear Mr. Nielsen: /~-- I I 445 EAST L.AKE 5TFlEET SUITE 230 WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TEL.EPHONE (6121475-1025 TEL.ECOP'EFl (6121 476-4447 ~~'{ \ 9 \989 Enclosed is a photocopy of the documentation by which Mr. Pyle acquired his interest in the real property containing the "Skipperette". By separate delivery, you will receive a site plan and variance application fee which describes the improvements which Mr. Pyle desires to make to the Skipperette facility. It is my understanding that the revised plan and application requests a variance only- in the "number" parking spaces. As you may recall, when Mr. pyle purchased the Skipperette, the building housed a small convenience grocery store and a video arcade. Neighbors, city officials, and the poLice departments of both Shorewood and Minnetonka made'numerous complaints about the arcade. Parking and traffic problems were almost continuous as area youth used the a~cade fo~a meeting and gathering place. In response to the problems associated with the arcade and in response to the neighborhood's request for an expanded neighborhood service facility, Mr. Pyle closed the arcade, completely remodeled and renovated his building, expanded the grocery portion of his business, and made plans to add gasoline sales to his neighborhood services. . As I understand the project, a variance, only for the "number" of parking spots is needed -by Mr. pyle. We believe that the variance should be granted by the city of Shorewood based upon the substantial benefit which has been experienced by the city, its police department and the neighborhood from the change in focus of Mr. Pyle's business. The bottom line is that the business which Mr. Pyle wants to conduct is a "neighborhood service business" that will: 1. Be consistent with the desires of the neighborhood; Exhibit C APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER Dated 19 May 1989 Mr. Brad Nielsen Page Two May 19, 1989 2. Result in a substantial reduction in traffic and parking congestion at his facility when compared with the operation of the video arcade; and 3. Assist the intersection between of Highway Seven. city in better defining and controlling the Vine Hill Road and the south frontage road I hope that you will give Mr. pyle's request your serious consideration. I'd appreciate it if you would contact me so that we can discuss the matter in person. ~ Very truly yours, ROBIN & THOMPSON, P.A. "/-----j ,~ / /-/A (__ /~~ttf-- a;.m~s G. R~bin JGR:wbs Enclosure ~ Exhibit C-2 t:1 t2j CIl H G) 2: (J ~ ~~ :", ,. .., J~ -, ~ , . (" r r. r rl ~i J j~ 0 \ "l\ "l\ ~ -J- 0 111 ~r PI .j c: r 0 3~ z Cl ~ .. ~ i .ii-'~.J ,!) ~ f ~ -' 0-0- \J) - p~ o~ (t~ ..\t ~ f/i::)~ it ~, ;>:;-:- ,.' .' ' ~) i i if -~ t _ -~r 11~@' i>~~h~-\- ~I . --+-!,..oi'.m .>~ ,I I ~ -I '1 , I ~~~-t.-/ I I I _,y~'.. r' (: -'-- ,'-.J,. ._'_'._C!~~."o+..J JJ ._. _ ""'-~ _ IP (Jl ~. n _ n__ _ __in --::!!. _.._ I tJ\' .........' - --.... ' ... 'd__'~':(:) ~ &J ,"" (" , ,-' .)- '0 ("f. . In.Z(,,'- - t / I l ,F=R p..g -, " VP' ~;.; 6: ^ V^II ~,'1 -..J ." )>- :II ;00; Z Cl LJI 1I CIl -f o -" :II "! ,f'1 (II ';00; - 11'1 " X " - m (II :II -f 111 -' -f Z -f Cl 111 . -'~ I: ! u T1 . . I G =l .y 'L -1- , , , , ~ > A- tI\ ... ?:..' ,";;. !:':' C;8 (\) r' "' ~ - "Y 1 ~ ~-, .. I- .. ~ J \ \ \ \ -~:,-:v., 'C '~ "'~ ,;'i u.~G / 7-r~ ,/ _..~- / /-' lO';'ll-::; . d-- / I'Z f~?i~~~ (110 f'1il ~ :17 :! Zf[f"CZ C ..-l ~ 7. U' 3v (j . ~ jlit ~I J:f(J:?,t f.I~.' ~.,. [) t I': i ~ 8(/ \ .1,. ,-'- j:~'~' a ~!~t ~ rl "1 ~1 , ~,.,u zC (\\ t ~Ir" ,. B6~ c: 0 r.: ~ "\ "' F ,(' \1' ~:i: ~-L 'E \ -- '-S': TO .::+- ::.. ~ J ) ..0- ~~ " ; C'~ F: 6[. . ".... ~---_._.., ~ _,_ ..-z ~ ....- -' ---.-. ~, ... VINE HILL ROAD I' ~ ' ~-\ ~ t . ../,,~/---~-,-- o o.~_..:; "- . ~ ' (' ~ ~ ...... ( ,.-- . ~'" 4> :t: J. ti>" '1- ~"t cr 10 ,'r ~ - -+- ~ ,.' 0 ., -r ? -c.'A- ~ ~ -;<":;:1- _ ~r.:::1 r-~E~. . ,; ':I~. i'!fiCi ~ r > -1\ 1) c . ,. " Q~ -f! o "d \ \ \ ~ \ m m Z . '" m . J ,..-,,,,.-,/'" -3 ;"') JUN - I :. GOOD MUSIC A GENCY INC. <!i May 30, 1989 . Shorewood City Hall Council Chambers 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Brad Nielsen Dear Mr. Nielsen: Our office is adjacent to the Skipperette. They have made alot of noticeable improvements. We feel there is a big need for gas on the southside of Highway 7. Please know the Pyle's closest neighbors are supportive. . B"ett;i: &--' Douglas Brown President Good Music Group DB/tjf .. - . - 'PDstDfficeBoX437,"&.celsio,.,1IIIN5S3:D "-<""",'r(6XZ}474-258J.- ..", ":Fa:{Q2}47D-1J709 ". c' 7eh?X:490-TJD0B47.2TGMAVI}~----:-' . ~~... ~ ;;:.~.~. f MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 29 April 1993 RE: Vine Hill Market - Revised Plans FILE NO.: 405 (93.06) Subsequent to his c. u. p.lvariance request being tabled from 6 April to 4 May, Jim Pyle and his engineer met with me to discuss certain design modifications which might eliminate the front yard setback variance and still provide adequate parking on the site. The revised plan (Exhibit A, attached) now complies with the IS-foot front setback. Two of the four spaces which had been located on the north side of the site have been relocated to the northeast of the building (spaces 1 and 2), resulting in 11 parking spaces for the site. . Since the circulation pattern around the building will be one-way, the paved area to the east of the building has been converted to green space. The applicant's attorney has addressed the street right-of-way issue in a letter, dated 6 April 1993 (Exhibit B, attached). The City Attorney has been asked to review and comment on this issue. / - If the City agrees with a proposed zoning text amendment which would reduce the number of .parking spaces for convenience stores with accessory. gas pumps, the revised site plan complies with parking requirements (except for the driveway setback from the comer). , While the layout is still considered very tight, the applicant has made considerable improvements to the site plan. If the City approves the conditional use permit based on the revised site plan and the amended Code, the approval should be subject to the following conditions: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . --e Re: Vine Hill Market Revised Plans . 29 April 1993. 1. The applicant should require employees to park in the four southerly spaces. 2. The applicant should provide a detailed signage plan including all business signs and traffic control signs~ 1 3. The southerly driveway should be clearly signed "One-Way Do Not Enter". 4. The applicant must provide cost estimates for all required improvements, including grading, paving, curbing, striping and landscaping. 5. A letter of credit in the amount of 1.5 times the cost estimates should be required to guarantee that site improvements will be completed. 6. The site should be monitored for potential on-street parking problems. If at any time problems arise, "no parking" signs should. be installed along the service road and Vine Hill Road. ~. 7. Phone from car facilities. should be eliminated to minimize congestion on the site. 8. Grading and drainage must be approved by the City Engineer. 9. Drainage must be approved by MNDOT. 10. Fuel pumps and tank installation must be approved by the Fire Marshall. 11. The trash dumpster should be enclosed with a ~asonry wall. cc: Jim Hum Tim Keane Joel Dresel Cary Smith Jim Pyle - 2 - Y ?Sn22srl17lz� PYI_E.JIM \ ' "� � %' "• - - _� �� �th g76 � \ ADVANCES RVEYING &ENGINEERING CO. ®• / ` ��/ ��'+ ��� - � .. �OP J�w� \ ��•N"'Y. Na. lOI 'nanwra.MN 35313 Pbx(612)d7t 7961 Fu (612)�7�alb7 i%i g � °�5. -✓ \ �� .: �'�.� Z�� ;:. .- . ;:,.. •;• JIMPYLE � O� r gl � � ��� °) C �. p 9 SURVEYED; ° • ober5.19�88 �G �o z 1 � ��'" �� Q. DI ' � �Z � � G I DRAFTED: • .• 19,1988. REVISED= Febrv.ry 5, 1993. ���' ,% � �( ,�`:�� l;a� ��.'`' g'1� 1�' 1 —� tD � . V •, REVISED AP•1115,1993. \ ` } i .�l� : .�A, � g � L�1 9 J REVISED April 19, 1993. " 9 / �: �� � �� `� a5� 1 ` �` Novenb� 16, 1992 to shoe pzoposed gas islands and � � ` ��(�e /"- T �6 �.y4 .(F.,�; � •, 1 � � parkl srrangewent for pral iminary by City, Client and I L�Q �o pUj .9 ° CP�1 othe affected gowrnaantal agencies. /� �/ \ � ( ^ r ! / y, yo I++ �� oop •'' 9.I6 • ..�: �i O` -, � - o-"'� -� � 1 �' t'' '� � �' 978'"' -� � Thet part of the Eaat 137 teee of ehe folloviny aaseriwa ( �o'��� � � • � , ., y � 974 ' � �' 1�o a 9'1 ���8 pro. rcy: w •\ �., -. � 4,a ° L Rl �.t � �.ti� .�g � That part of Lot u, vine Hiu, described a. tollovs: , r•-'� �— __� � g5 e � N ° ' D�1$ � !�� `� Coueneing st a point on the Eaet line of said Lot, ' � � p� ° �tn�!'� hy Jay/ G ; 79 5,1, distant 775 feet South of the Northesat corner of said �.' 5 Na g � U a II Lot; thence West perpendicular to said East line, along j � line hereinafter referred to as line •A" a distance of 1ne .,� �, °f a of � 1 ? a„ 9 �9 feet to a point hereinafter referred to es Point •X•; ,�r�� - t 9� a ° � � 9�� �d��ip0� � � ��Wea � thence continuing Wast on said Lina "A" to the West line of the East 330 feat of said Lot, and said Line "A" there /� �� � '� Sign 9� o rO� � ending: thence North along said West line of the East 770 / � � a feet a distance of 71.9 feet more or leas to the �or� { i" � �ty�+ 5� 8 � Q�� C - Southwesterly line of the zighE- of -way of State Highway O C�'Z ��;� � � � - �l•: �' �� �„ ' 1�� ,[ �\ � No. 7: thence Northeeaterly along said Southeasterly line , �O / h 'J� y \, ��/ {' _ � FH7 e 5 .` 0 �( a distance of 121 feet to the actual point oL beginning of /'' ���� /'>f���� Oj �' ��S,Q& �� 0� al - the land to be described: thence Southeastezly along a 1p Q-� . ^�`� G i i t � � i � �! . �;1� ,i�q 9 ` � e Q 9 rt , 9 BQ line, which if extended would pass through said Point "X ", cj"1 6 �^� .•.,� � j � - � , `� ®� ^ � E 1 : � � o - - � j,� �� � � ' I . g$ ©� to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and C� � - (7 C� ".�" ® p � �r ::483 �. � distant 20 feet. North Lros said Line A ": thence East ,��' t)i' along said parallel line to caid East line; thence 1 �� ' f 3 ,f� P ® �.,.• -" . Southwesterly to the actual point of beginning, ' . - ^^ �. g77 `� 6 ' � ¢II 7 ,/ ..-,., : ". :: ���. ,�' and lying North of a line described as follows: t," .r ' �" ® J r Coemencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 15: thence 1 � �� South along the E ;st line of said Lot a distance of 294.59 r o�c� arc of vao, Ircrx* adc cu�ee _ , 9 r �..ler �'� •., � ® "� # �'� r Ste _ s �, �; �y 1 rr _, .ter � .c M ��` �� T 8� feet to the point of beginning of the line to be describe; J Y, ,• I ybre�[s 4 S a..�` s - r F*- = r - �� � thence deflecting right 90 degrees to the Wast line oP � _ DtNOTES ECISTJNC CONT77UR � .` � '*� "ta -`�'' �"� e. "a-� t 'e r'�` � ;-` t Y said East 133 feat, and there ending. 0� V , s r y z �` w�f r' S � z � x a ''IR s' -� :r's '� v °. y �' � F F� ' f r: F t0 C, .r � �• �ed � :� r 4 `� . "; r'_ f" "* "'P '�° (`r �.r Y .= Q� 3 �3;il ® J t s � 31 � 1 IMI"ATIONS. C ' a�` -7— � /� -� • � - ,p� r>,�t s.tt s.r •.�. �J" rk� 3 ���t� =� �'y: *,. � i' °1 y; s��7 X �� �z�.,,yx"k'�? r �: 6� � V' w<r.. „e.eo."m,.,era r•s.+y'.erc�ur aK.,.r..u,o."v•w,+aroe..xa ..,:o�.;....,�.b. ,R.+d. `' 4' a gcy 1 � ��:� ��. � c�< z 'r.�s � �� �:�`�'- �' ���w � ='t c.C,�r '' 9$� to�4l�xfG ��x'�z'�1"�;� n y 3 , ,t � � 3 3 J w� � — oErvores swaroseD coNrDUR F 5r, �.4 w k.., m�++ onu.,, ka.++, m. r. n... v< p. y., n. r .a 9 , 11 � O _ �y � • � l � tnpl�? .1 � S b _ r/�.rF • ,� fi>G. a � { � LI t� + t � k a � �` a ,ee m,.,mw.e of ram ° n.. es.. zdaa. on..+ 1, ne...w..fanekpiaen�pi..o�p.+.* ia+,.w..l Qr 97 W/' -�' `� �v'' t � O � v + s � ,v a «'�? .�,� C.' � "' ,� F � ? �, ;t�"' yh �:.�.�` - � '•� Q t0 r„e ,a,.m ,o p.b.. wr ,en+ ..a �.. , ak y ».+ a........ p ,k ..,.�. we .e. w. ,,,w. �itY J,` ,k�...OS .y "'C1.+ �F.,� a - a 1� . '�.'� a��` ..•' S :s ,�,,. .� k �.�w r e`v 't - 10 3 O .... .. a�ma�axw..... � .r.rn..Wr+reaocw..2e,w,Oarr.ers ikwr....nod M',.oe va t # r` ▪ 3 .� `� Y o.4iS Uer.inle rl..icY.e,hs �.qa�+u. . W �.s Q. r - 1 t� � x� T �. - 907 4 t �,-s '... 5" i.� l y. d el tX �° 4 } i a �'' ; �t'-cK ;,a. • iiD Q V) ` 9F J } c 8 °Y � } 3�.-r y �:€ �, z �' ql) �'� 2 i c � ,/ .�. \ � ° O `O _ . - . _. r m m� � axe �r r)'� gna �.� .« � � ` `�' . r; ay,, ''''i ?fie / � � '� I� � Q � � '� -- -- - .. _ .. ., f 5 #U` ,_. g�t � a '� '�" y��`'t *.,gyp .t.p " ®q °s 4 � � � 4 �� � #.'. ® � y�j C�8 2 � c �' f x � F =t #"�. " L`� � � ��" ' r�-" j k�'�r C Ctl � { o b '� �'S' F, i� =, i7 � �., � �• ,�' H � ��7 Revised Apzil 15, 1993 to show proposed gee ielanda on north o � r .+'` � �' , y� �etd #r� - ,�(,�` � � - �� v �{� 1 n � �' - � �, C tp (j� � end of cite and again on April 19, 1993 Co chow gee islands W F }�,�. �� ��� J (� �� � � ���', � �0t1C - fe yV r)( �. r -' ;'q�'�� x :.+- ,' ».. (b _ e back on Weet aide but drive eliminated on east aide an 3 � -., ' '`'- 'a..,,,,,�, >�..�..� - +� � r r z s � � � y C� ` addtional green space and parking, also additional gree 9s2 �� 1 1, ,,fi r -•• �.,.. ,�.� ,� ., ., ° g � � � = O p; apace on north aide. 982 6 , s �` � g' �6 •• 't� " "r��.,.� ��t���������� - " ®� Y_����`'' ' ;o N - � v � ��\ �� t ? f r� ; j (�, 41.0 4D '. "� �,� ' �3 "rn�� o� 3 W '� � — 933 c� °+t�' g:C" '°' � � � ° s r o '.� � F] •• c1/ ' W � �° E `-' � � o r f r = g . • ► � �4 � _ � N � to o to 20 3a _ � ��. r � o �� � 17.57 .�_ � �� 8� — ■ . ■ .. ��■ 9: '7 ' �r� c -;� �,�,yF�?� ® � . 25 ,� _ L a , � z L � � ■ ■ � ■ • �� � f � � 1 p, � S � a SCALE IN FEET •r a n ��� t + k`�'�` g ,�o Exisrinq Y z � �' N � , 9 ` r�1 J � � ��� .; F�,� ©� � 3 ,teN ���� AREA =17725 S4. FT Includin Vine Hill Road - [� ., Z '•: '= l rt .r����' �� g �l ,��` _ - �� v, 13,598 54. FT. (Excluding Vine Nill Road) ° �r'�p .: - W� � San. Sew i:�F�� � � � ? ° � � . . � � ,� �i a = � 3� ��k { r a ' � 49.5 � 11.4 : '� � x ,�,v S S ..', T "l�:.4. 4 � � •.ConC�`�Wa/k � �9:4 2—,,� �" . a + � ,., :� �-�� � - _� �3,�^ " #�' '{F °� (� w � _� �SI'ANDARD SYMBO[S dt CONVENTIONS; � Q �;' � 4 * � - � t T � ; r � � -� � -a< � , : ���� �` r � � ��� � - �. 3 `� m 3 ` •°• D�.a Irz' ID� �pwk pnt erri.� suk � N..ev slu. rt u •a• a. nuaa k Iw N + ,�� v� .p y �e i1C -.t t : � � � FJe.n�wa e.dwN U.O°e lrlio�c Frq�we°dMlion.ala de..ik,s indioK as.iae ek..vlkrt k � : W • �. ; ,'�i �? • k g z G 4 a ,," a `'" �i3' - i • ° 1 l " W ,t' ► � � � � 9E4 CERTIFICATION; W , t .k 4' ( a�`(� {. ? �• r n r r(�f��ln � tc �- �� /1 a •` ' ,���j u � �1 . _,....,��- e"'L I � pe ry � • r�r" Ar r� . V' � �j oD 1 .er onl IEaI tEb su �u ,rd by a,c nr nWcr di,act .n niawro .nd dui 1 aw a . o' � ;�. a rf� ��� " ""' �c.. '1. �:.'; �`.; �`,��0' mNa..a..l Eaoea.,.dahore_.io.N Snn�7or..aa ule L,..alae SUKar Mt..ewxa . •a Lr7� ��; ��,cT'a?:r V � - •at R '��,:5�?s�q,..��.:. `q�r_, .; ��,�'� �' .'a � E] �f ` ,- I \•�s�y � _ rdl . , � �.: �,y� �' ta:',!� - - �.�� • „ �r ..--- - -- ep ® ' " 3 Jaaes H. hrtcr P.E /c PS Na 4LL5 � . ' L Y • -- - ® -- 3.00- ,, . 1 � o � - � -- -' � SCA1E: ONE INCH EOUAIS 10 F ,- �'=-_- � 9as a ¢ - -- t33.00- - 9a5 c Exhibit A t,'orther/y Edge of 1 - -- N.as °4a'32" E. � � REVISED St'1'E PLAN ° � Bituminous I N �' � Vine Hill Market - C.U.P. a' �' °' 1 _ , . . FILE COpy ROBIN & THOMPSON. P.A. 445 EA.ST L.AKE STREET ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 230 WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE (612) 475-1025 TELECOPIER (612) 476-4447 Direct Line 475-0987 April 6, 1993 The Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331-8927 -"..."'........""~...."._~.:.~"., ,,,._, -, ~ .. RE~ttrll Market - C. U . P . Parking Requirements... Your File No. 405(93-06) for Fuel Pumps and Variance to We are the attorneys for Mr. James Pyle, d/b/a Vine Hill Market, located at 19215 State Highway 7. In a staff report to the Planning Commission, Mayor, and the City Council, Brad Nielsen requested that Mr. Pyle obtain an opinion with respect to the location of the easterly line of his property and the westerly line of the Vine Hill Road. Although the legal description to Mr. Pyle's property describ~s the easterly property line to be the approximate centerline of the traveled portion of Vine Hill Road, Mr. Nielsen has indicated that County half-section maps show 33 feet of public right-of-way on each side of the centerline of Vine Hill Road. Mr. Pyle has asked us to opine on the question of the width of the public right-of-way for Vine Hill Road. We have searched the Hennepin County title records and the hal f -section maps with the assistance of the Hennepin County Surveyor's Of f ice. We can find no records constituting any dedication of Vine Hill Road for public use in this particular location nor can we find any evidence of any conveyance, the granting of any easement, or the application of any condemnation action that would result in any public body acquiring any easement or outright title to the area of Vine Hill Road adjoining Mr. Pyle's property. Despite the absence of dedication or conveyance of a road right-of- way, no one can dispute the existence and use of Vine Hill Road for at least six years as a public road across a portion of Mr. pyle's property. Accordingly, by Minnesota Stat. S160.05, Vine Hill Road is "...deemed dedicated to the public to the width of the actual use... ." Any question regarding the width of the right-of-way is now also answered by statute and case law. ,C-6. e f: t... V\~- I +~ -J ,q~ Exhibit B APPLICANT'S ATIORNEY'S LEITER Dated 6 April 1993 . The Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council of Shorewood April 6, 1993 Page 2 Minnesota Stat. S160.05, subdivision I, states in pertinent part as follows: "When any road or portion of a road has been used and kept 1n repair and worked for at least six years continuously as a public highway by a road authority, it shall be deemed dedicated to the public to the width of the actual use and be and remain, until lawfully vacated, a public highway whether it has ever been established as a public highway or not." (Emphasis added) . Prior to amendment in 1982, the same statute provided in pertinent part as follows: "When any road or portion thereof shall have been used and kept in repair and worked for at least six years continuously as a public highway, the same shall be deemed dedicated to the public to the width of two rods on each side of the centerline thereof and be and remain, until lawfully vacated, a public highway whether the same has ever been established as a public highway or not;" (Emphasis added for clarity.) . Prior to the 1982 amendment of S160.05, the Minnesota Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of statutory language that sought to establish a road right-of-way width greater than "the width of actual use". In Walter Barfnecht, et al., v Town Board of Hollywood Township, Carver County, (304 Minn. 50S, 232 N.W.2d 420), the Supreme Court held that a statute deeming a dedication to the public to the width of two rods on each side of the centerline thereof, if construed to extend public dedication of a road by public use to widths greater than that of actual public use, amounted to an unconstitutional taking of property without due process of law. In its decision the court held that th~ acquired right-of-way was limited to the width actually used. Based upon the language of the 1982 statutory amendment and upon the Barfnecht case, it is clear that Mr. pyle has not lost to public use any more of his property than the most easterly 13 feet thereof which constitutes the traveled portion of Vine Hill Road. Sincerely, ROBIN & THOMPSON, P.A. ~-a ~%~obin JGR: lmd ,^ James D. Pisula, Jr. i6175sho;e-;'ood Oaks-nriv-;:-Sho;e~;;~M~es~~55331--(612)474=1949 23 April 1993 Mr. Brad Nielsen, Planning Director City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 FAX 474-0128-3 pages, including this one Dear Brad: . This note confirms our telephone discussion this morning regarding the Pyle variance requests/ordinance change investigation. Please make copies of this letter a:p.d distribute them as noted with the agenda for the 4 May meeting. I've tried to withhold my tendency to want to butt into Jim Pyle's operation and run his business for him-it's his money at risk, not mine. 1. Parking . I'll wait for the Staff research to be complete, but make the observation that convenience stores with gasoline service are now the norm, and that they still tend to draw significant non-fuel traffic. The SuperAmerica at 3357 University Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, has 12 fuel pumps and 4-6 parking spaces, with on-street parking the rule during the store peak times of 6:30-8:30 and 4:30-6:00, when their fuel business is also very heavy. The S.A. at the intersection of Routes 41 and 7 in Chanhassen has 9 parking spaces separate from fuel, and they s~ to be 50-75% full whenever I go there. About half of all visits at fuel-vending convenience stores are for purchases other than gasoline (personal observation). Fuel sales will build traffic at his store; he will attract new customers and get fuel purchases from current customers. For more current information on convenience store visits, I suggest contacting Marketing/Site Selection people at Tom Thumb, Holiday Corp. or SuperAmerica. Given the circulation problems on that lot, I '{could feel vay uncomfortable with any fewer than 11 parking spaces available, plus counting tr.oo spaces at the pumps for a total of 13. Much of the area on the north of the lot will be used for staging of cars to the fuel pumps, and the parking spaces on the south end of the lot will be inaccessible whenever both aisles are filled. I don't support giving credit for any more than two parking spaces at the fuel pumps with this particular lot configuration. Cars parked two abreast will prevent other vehicles from reaching open dispensing pumps. 2. North Setback Variance/"Phone from Car" Stands Ido not support a setback variance for the north end of this lot. There needs to be some place for snow storage, and that area will be a primary storage location. Also, the area will be needed for traffic circulation and staging, so no parking can be permitted. The two "Phone from Car" stands should be taken out, since they will not be accessible to drivers and their use would impede traffic circulation. If :Mr. Pyle wishes to retain public phones, they should be located on or in the building. . 3. One-Way Traffic Circulation/Narrow Pump Aisles/Aisle Width Variance One-way traffic is the only way this lot can work for fuel sales. One-way traffic circulation must be a condition of granting the permit. Due to the narrow aisles on the west side of the lot, traffic is likely to queue in the north end space, impeding access to those spaces. Additionally, when both fuel pump aisles are used, the spaces on the south end of the lot are not accessible. Since the Minnesota fire code requires that the pumps be located 10 feet from the building and that dispensing hoses not reach to within five feet, the hose lengths will be shorter than those typically found at convenience store fuel pumps. These short hose lengths are likely to exacerbate congestion, as cars jockey for position, lengthening their stay at the pumps. . I'm not crazy about either the one-way traffic flow or the narrow aisles, but if the fire marshal signs off, it's OK with me. If the layout doesn't work from a business standpoint, Mr. Pyle's customers will let him know by taking their business elsewhere. 4. Setback Variance-Curb Cuts along Vine Hill Road I support these variances, since their need is directly related to the lot configuration. 5. General Observations I believe Mr. Pyle is trying to put eight pounds of apples into a five pound sack; this property is marginal, at best, for a convenience store/fuel station operation. If the building were smaller, the site would work much more effectively for this type of business, in my opinion. If that is not an .-I-=' 1-' r.... '-:::1 I '=\-J...J :o..I::1,'l..,-n ~,...J'-, I." -li-!...J ;:'C :~T ZF,; S;:' ddfoj ** ~~~ ~~Od IO~U~ ** '" ,... option, then the modifications noted here are a way to address the problems of incorporating his desired use into this lot. While I concur with Jack Hansen tlult this site is not well suited to its proposed use and that business problems may be the result, I also concur with Doug Malam that it's not our position to tell Jim Pyle how to run his business--just to make it conform to our policies. I prefer to let market forces determine the success or failure of Jim Pyle's business. We're here to make land use recommendations that make the dty a more livable place, not to tell folks how to run their businesses. . Bob Bean Louise Bonach Deborah Borkon Jack Hansen Dan Lewis, City Council Doug Malam Kirk Rosenberger, Chair . \ ;/ ..,/ MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 27 April 1993 RE: Minnetonka Country Club - Simple Subdivision/Combination FILE NO.: 405 (93.08) BACKGROUND . Owners of the Minnetonka Country Club have requested approval of a simple subdivision/combination to correct boundary line questions between the Club property and the Paul Swanson property, located at 24460 Yellowstone Trail (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The properties are located in the R-1A~Single-Family Residential zoning district. . , . / \ . /. As can be seen on Exhibit B, the Club proposes to trade a 10' X 196' strip of their property for a 10' X 57' strip of the Swanson property. The Swanson property currently contains 50,883 square feet of area. The land swap would result in an increase of 1390 square feet for the Swanson property. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The division/combination is relatively simple except for one issue. Country Club Road abutting the properties is substandard with respect to right-of-way width. Shorewood's policy has been consistent in. such cases to acquire required right-of-~ay at the ti,me land is subdivided. It is therefore recommended that right-of-way be dedicated as shown on Exhibit C as a.'condition of approval of the subdivision/combination. Based upon the preceding it is recommended thatthe applicants'request be approved subject to the following: . A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5F-J . . \ Re: ,Mtka Country Club/Swanson Simple Subdivision/Combination 27 April 1993 1. The applicants m~st provide legal descriptions and deeds for the right-of-way as - shown on Exhibit 'C. 2. The applicants must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion or title- 90mmitment for the Country Club property and the Swanson property. 3. Since no new lots are'being created, park dedication fees and sewer access charges are not required. 4. The subdivision/combination must be recorded within 30 days of the Council's approval or the approval will be void. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel James Penberthy \ \, -0 - 2 - -a,...... -r~....... cia/I;~(; i"', _1- :~~ I;' '~6. i?g)~.',~~. C) :~; Lj ::.~. ~ ( I .. ..;(' , ~- ~, .:/" ... ',.,.. ~: ,I' oCt (7) , -: .J ;...;4<;...... <#>.''j_:/ l:! , (8)~: r:: , (,-<, ~~ <2.~ ,AJ L~ r ~....:'" , -/{ 7: "'~",' ~v '1': \/'~, ~ , N "C<:;: \' '\. '-lu0G-" ~r;/ ,~." <::." - ( IE~CUW CUllD..D..~ '1 em oo~ " ( 17) -a ~~~ " I '.i -..... Ci " (, ... I, ) ,. '.. '- 'y '6', l.:... .1 '-' 154 .:.--'/ C", ., ,.......... ,.', , , . , "1:'.: .& ~ : .1 .1 :1'. I~ 15 4<."':-->'. .. : ({6)" Lu!t~: '. I , I :- / ,", r, I, l'-I"':'~';P ./_)!If 1\ /,... , '. \ OUtlot I '9 :i ___u____h_ .; $ ~ 795 ,.) ........ ............." 4'....................... ;: :: If,t'l'l ~ 1.. TT ~ ~...::-::- 6'7.1_ / ) I . .J .. t1.ort ~ }.lot ~?'" \a; (5) =~::.t6L.~~..___; ~-~ ,:tl , . (6) :--_L~,' '''.s -...--- : ."',S. }'7 -b. --.--- --.zSi--------- (7) . {~1 . I , . , : - . , , , , : (3-) _._.-..1..--..----- .,-' ;~. 53: 200 Jb. roo-- -- -- - ---3~o:s:,----:T ------ ; 171.n :: 913 :~ ~ r'" ...... 'vi ., ~ 19 :: I ~i , (23)" a H (24) " ., (25) "J . . I i -; ~o\( Go~(~(..I ~lUJ[D) .---' .L..lO( t,;.;; ------...-- 6vbjuJ 6,t~ ( ( ,,- r : iR ~.Il~~. '35 ." ea. 34. ~.l.. '): ' ';,;~;..~ ....1/.1$./~ I' ~ (24) , ~ .(. Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Mtka Cntry Club/Swanson division/combination .\ -71.' I ,<:' ~ (17) ~ , . ~ ./ /: ~// .... .? \33 / -,() . ,/, . I' ,- .......cy. . ,.)1 . S\)'O'\. \., ~\,c . ~O. ,,-tVc.Ovt'I f.) '01 .' <t- 31. ~. ~~ \g S'\~ \,\:j\ ./ '., \\\<tl.. '2~' r,; ()~ ,/ c:~ S \~<t- /"~ooc.i> "" \, /' d" y.<t-S\ /' ;.\>' \ --.....-.. f~.~., Ci"I7:...: ~J+".~;~:..::..:...,. .... . ," .... ....,. . .... . . ........ ... . ..' .... EASTERL Y LINE OF LOT 37. AUD. SUB. NO. 1 s~;:---~-- .~.~ ----- ~ -----M~~~;_O--:------ ~ --\ 0330 ~ . . 8E . SEt ' It' II: Z o '!: Q Z ::> o ... .' ~ . 0' '" ." ~. .~ ~~ ~ 'cr ~'. '.,.. ..0 " <"~ .~ -t- w o , \ \ St>.. ~p f;> \ '0..> \ 'V \ ~ \ ~ \ .,..~ '\ ~ ~ \ U> \ \\ '6', \ .~ . . ~/)I..,' ",,-",S. t.~\) ~I'o " <t- On? ,\~ . 3'0 S '2.b. '0'2.:19 \ '" to ~ I' g) ~r~ /--~ ~ '_I ~r/'" 3 . I- 111 (/) \ ~ ~ HI . W /",' , ~ ~ w ~ j ~ J ~ ~1 4.- - () 'S ~ \ \ \, ~ .~===.. -~~ 1:.t ~~ \ \ '~" , 7- ~ ~ () ~ ~ 1 \ ." \ w /,. \. ",''0 .:?~ \ ,5\ . <;b 6'0 . , '~~ \ \> \ IU't.~ \\0 ~ '{ d \..-r '\ ....::.:>~ \ ':':" \ --:;';" '~ >~'., ......\ \ .' ,,' " ;.... " ..,.., \. Exhibit B PROPOSED DMSION/COMBINATION ~ " \~ \(\~ 0" ,0 -11) Nb "< /NE c:O~. OF loT ::>1, / AUD.5UB.NO. /33. N &30 /4' 44" E.. \" :.:> 18.40 \ \ I :l 1Z,D~V, to bL de.J i a-t .eJ ~~ b . -1~ NO 5GALE. ::;t 1 uJ U/ I ,.... .. I . ... In. 0 ~ \J. ~ .0 :3 ;t ~ \J") , '-V III an ~ ~ lL I" I --..J o~ I uJ~ : ~\f} ..J .1.1. I. ~ 0 ~J .. ~~ J I':; Jt%" I hereby certi fy that this is a true; above described parcels of land. As su '. ( l' \ .;.i~_ I ~~ ~.. Vt.Mm4,J, l ~/~/. Thomas S. Bergquist' Registeroo Land Survey' Minnesota License No. 7725 Exhibit C RECOMMENDED RIGHT -OF-WAY DEDICATION Required r .0. w. shown shaded t,\'~( . -,'-1"'. :Penberihy Ball) Qffices, Bid. 264 WATER STREET EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 PHONE (612) 474-1188 JAMES G. PENBERTHY fiLE COpy May 4, 1993 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 ATTN: Brad Nielsen . Re: Our File No.2309 Minnetonka Country Club Association, Inc.- Swanson Dear Brad: Minnetonka Country Club Association, Inc. and Mr. and Mrs. Swanson are not able to comply with the first condition contained in your memorandum dated 27 April 1993 and received in my office on May 3, 1993. . The applicable part of the ordinance in question is a "safety valve" to allow simple subdivisions such as this one without requiring the applicants to meet the requirements of the main part of the subdivision ordinance. Street dedication requirements should therefore not apply. To say otherwise would obviate the reason for this saving provision in the ordinance. - The exchange itself will create absolutely no impact on the street in question or any street. Any need for widening the street would be created by some future development not related to this extremely small land swap. It is not reasonable for the City to require a street dedication from a simple boundry swap which does not burden the municipal systems in any way. The City could use the power of eminent domain to acquire the property if and when the need exists. I respectfully request that the Planning Commission delete the first condition in your memorandum. The applicants have no objection to the rest of the items in the memorandum. I am unable to attend the meeting of the Planning Commission and would therefore ask that this letter be distrubuted to the members for their review at the meeting. 5F-2\ . , If you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. lly yours, Penberthy cc: Minnetonka Country Club Association, Inc. Mr. and Mrs. Paul Swanson . . .~ MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 28 April 1993 RE: Excelsior Covenant Church - Simple Subdivision\Combination FILE NO.: 405 (93.11) BACKGROUND Excelsior Covenant Church has agreed to sell a small triangle of the southwest corner of their site to Pete Boyer for his Seasons P.D.D. senior housing project. The church property is located at 19955 Excelsior BoulevardJsee Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). Exhibit B shows how the proposed division impacts the church. . ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The proposed property line change reduces the church property by 13,680 square feet, leaving 324,346 square feet of area (7.45 acres). As can be seen on Exhibit B, the land is of little value to the church. property. Mr. Boyer apparently.. needs it to try and keep 24 units in his housing project (this will be addressed under separate cover). It is recommended that the division/combination be approved subject to the applicant recording the transaction with the County Recorder within 30 days of the Council's approval. cc: JimHurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel Pete Boyer A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore SG. .....~. ..:'. .. . . ..d. I . . ..1 DEEPHAVEN " .4.' . . , ... "... ./ . -.~ . ~" :. ~ .. :.: . !....:;. :.~:..::. .' .J ...J :c ... z :> Subject site ~ ~ North Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Excelsior Cov. Church - subdivision/combination / ~ J...~ . . .~.. . ...~... r-...H..... ........-. .. ......'...... ........ "'.d..___,. ......,..._~,__......... ..,."'............__.~.............~....................... . _. '.".. '" (ij) ~ ~ 8 tIl . --/ 0( ~ .~ j.-\ 01 K:l> 0 .~.~ >- -4 -10 r "'1'1 tIl ~'" z. !:\ , / ~ 'v /' / X- y "' ~ /' ~ \0 / / ~' ~' \ 1; Ill" I x. '1",'11 ~ 111 I ... d. '.. .1 t!~~~~ :tl)~j,," .,~..C~ ~ ,.-- 1)~~6~~ \l3.!! ~ ~,~ l) li~, r~~ :i~i\E;i !!"~i:l "j! z -( "s:" r !,~I\ ; , ~J. ! ~ '" '" hd:;~ ~ "H~~ -t ;-!,..::,~ ~ ~~ ;1)1', H ~- ~ ~ -t.O:Z o ! ~ "'il i ,. ,; ~a"" :; "'; ~ ': ~:a 'I"' j ~ f' i : (. ~ I "' . " . '" \ .,.'>:-.:-.---~: ': \11 I I, I I ',I ' ....~>>Jl )ig~...~~ ~j.~~~o ~8~~~~ ':'~i~e;...(. ~~;: p-~"'- "'>~!l~~ 7'r =- l' ~ ,~ 5 ~ 'I ~ i f'"!:.... I ~" 1\ \1 =" Ii: "'~ ~ ......., r '" 3 i. .. :! ~ C Jl .. ~ 'i' . (.. ~" ~" ' /..........,---<:.:~'- /' , ./ y' ", .....-. . ~,' ~//~ ~,"'- .- .' . .. .. .." //~.', - " S !. ,!\ ~ .. ... ~' It .. t ) ..' -' . ': - , : 1 1:~ ) l= 01 ,~, )" f' \ J> , , ~ \ ~ " ,,. \ I ~... .dlt. ~l" 03 , 0 I ~ .. " 1< ) ~ " ,: ... .. \) -\ 1 1 .. i~~ ,~~ ~ ..~O ,,&t ~ 'i .\ ~~~ 1)-' It 't.~ ..t- 'J }'. I 1"" > , '5 " )Sl j....\ ' I . ". I .. :: ~ j. s ,. ~ . 8 ~ , <) I .'c: '.. ~ -" 'l: ~ l'" ~ - t ~ ... f1I () ~ b' i ~ -c. l' ~ 'z.'" a z! t. 'H O--,.",c",~o~,s , t~ -I1;~-l ?: t"lI % z;: )~)QlI"~l> 11-1 F I))' .. c G\ Q:l _ ..)l ,,1I ~ ;- z. > ~ Go)- Z. -)- 'II Z. -II" 0 Cl~~~")-tJ-I ~~~. ...~~~ ~I ~ ) ~ 11 Jl' - .. Il'.. ~:Ha~ h~~\'.~, ,. a")- -lit ~t\ -."ll X-l r '" ..-ft~ rd () ,,'" :;,- "'-I ll&r,~:jJ: ) CI c:: "'.. ~i ,,~-<. 1\ ~~".. g Il ,.~~ ~ ~ cb tho 1-- '-'< ~ ~ ~ ,..~ti '>.. ~ ~c!" 'lilt "81 ~o!c ~"\f 9~o 9>1 < tIl ~ ~ 0 oj > ) r- III l;! ~ r ~ > ~ 'll -"\>~ r- r ~ '" "'\ .. ) ..;- ,. .\ l.. ~ ~: : Z ,0 t:) ,~ t (\\ II ,~ ~ )l. 0 -<.. -' ~t',O ~ ~ : "'-' ;g~ oS: "'dg 0.... C/.lbj ~ t:::l ~ C/.l 1-1 o Z >>lOR COVENANT CHURCH ~ 5509 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD '61@[fi) n MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA ~ 0 ij 55345 U'@[fi)O~@@U@ (612)933-3011 lOA BOULEVARD .....NNl!!tlOTA a5331 U Fee. "0 " M"I\"O ~ e." CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 . (612) 474-3236 , MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 3 May 1993 RE: Seasons P.U.D. - Revised Concept Plan FILE NO.: 405 (92.23) In November of 1992 Pete Boyer was granted concept stage approval for an elderly housing project called Seasons. The conditions of approval were based upon the recommendations of the Planning Commission and included in Council Resolution No. 116-92, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. . The developer has had two major issues to contend within preparing his development stage plans: 1) complying with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA91) requirements; and 2) designing around an existing MNDOT, storm sewer easement which cuts through the site. These issues have resulted in substantial redesign of the project. Exhibit B shows the previously approved concept plan. Exhibit C shows a revised plan. In order to try and maintain 24 units, the developer has arranged to purchase approximately one-third of an acre from the Excelsior Covenant Church. The subdivision/combination necessary for this transaction has been addressed under separate cover. He is also~' negotiating for an easement from the Church for drainage purpose. I Despite the additional property, the developer has had difficulty fitting the 24 units on the site. Following is how the revised plan complies with the approved concept plan: 1. The developer has submitted proposed protective covenants for the project which include age restrictions for residents. The covenants have been reviewed by the City Attorney and were found to contain appropriate provisions relative to age restrictions (see Exhibit D). The only change necessary is toadd the City of Shorewood as a party to the covenants so that they can not be changed, without City approval._ A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5.H./ Re: Seasons P.U.D. . Revised Concept Plan 3 May 1993 2. The applicant has not s~own future decks or patios. It is questionable whether room exists for such features on several of the units. 3. Buildings have been squeezed together more than the Concept Plan. For example, units 8 and 9 are only nine feet apart. All structures must b~ at least 14 feet from the other. structures. . - 4. Access driveways must be 24 feet wide. Twenty feet is shown on the plan. ( - 5. No landscape plan has been subIllitted. 6. The proposed berm on the south end of the site has been located entirely on the applicant's property, simplifying MNDOT's review of the project. MNDOT will still have to approve the realignment of their storm sewer easement. . 7. The developer apparently' has come to an agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding plans for drainage. Development stage plans must include a final drainage plan with stormwater runoff calculations. In light of the preceding a recommendation of approval can not be made at this time. Expanding the project with land available from the Excelsior Covenant Church should he viewed favorably. The developer needsto review these requirements with his surveyor/engineer. It is possible that units will have to be sacrificed in order to comply. If the developer can . provide the required information no later than 11 May, this item should be tabled to the 18 May Planning..Commission meeting. Otherwise it should be tabled.to 1 June 1993. .. cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Tim Keane Pete Boyer - 2 - .- RESOLUTION NO. 116-92 (g(Q)[?J\! A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR SEASONS P.U.D. WHEREAS, Pete Boyer Construction, Inc. (Applicant) is the owner of real property located in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for approval of a Concept Plan for the construction of a residential planned unit development known as Seasons (Seasons . P.U.D.) containing twenty-four (24) twin-home units on approximately 4.2 acres ofland; and WHEREAS, the project is proposed as elderly housing, pursuant to the requirements of 1201.03 Subd. 20 of the City Code; and . WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 7 October 1992, which memorandum is on f1le at City Hall, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its regular meeting of 13 October 1992 recommended approval of a Concept Plan for the 24-unit Seasons P. U.D.; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at its regular meeting of 26 October 1992 at which time the City Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the City Council from the Applicant and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as . follows: 1. The Applicant's request for approval of a Concept Plan for Seasons P. U.D. is subject to the following conditions of approval as set out in the Planning Staff Report dated 7 October 1992: (a) As part of his development stage plans the developer should submit a draft of proposed protective covenants which would limit occupancy to people 62 years of age or older. (b) The development stage plan must demonstrate that all units have room for future decks or patios, complying with setback requirements. (c) The site plan must be adjusted to comply with building separation requirements. (d) The site plan must provide for 24-foot driveways plus 20 feet of space in front of each garage. Circulation must be approved by the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal~ Exhibit A CONCEPT STAGE APPROVAL Council Resolution No. 116-92 "I'., (e) The developer should submit a more detailed landscape plan as part of his development stage submittals. (t) Prior to submitting development stage plans, the developer must obtain approval fromMNDOT for use of the current service road right-of- way. (g) The developer must address existing and proposed site drainage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2. City Council approval of the Concept Plan is subject to all applicable standards, regulations, and requirements of the Shorewood City Code, including, but not limited to the following: (a) Section 1201.04 Subd. 1. regarding the procedures for review and approval of conditional use permits; . (b) Section 1201.06, Subd. 3. regarding special procedures for the establishment of a P. U.D. by conditional use permit; (c) Section 1201.03 Subd. 20. regarding the special requirements for elderly housing projects; (d) Section 1201.25 Subd. 6.(b)(1) regarding the purpose of concept plan approval. 3. Approval of the Concept Plan is not intended, nor does it act to grant approval of a Development Stage Plan or Final Stage Plan which are required pursuant to Section 1201.25, Subd. 6.(c) and (d). . CONCLUSION 1. The application of Pete Boyer Construction, Inc. for approval of the Concept Plan for the Seasons P. U.D. as set forth above is hereby approved. 2. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood this 30th day of . November 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk .. . "All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2~, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, 11innesota according to the Government Survey thereof, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of the right-of-way conveyed to the St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railway Company, which point is 411.68 feet in a straight line from a point on the said North right-of-way line where the same intersects the West line of the above mentioned tract at a point 41 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Easterly along said right-of-way curving to the right along the circumference of a circle, the radius of which is 673 feet to the South line of said tract at a point on same 508 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along said South line 63.5 feet to a point 88.64 feet West of the Southeast corner of said tract; thence Northeasterly parallel with and 56 feet Northwesterly from the centerline between the tracts of the Suburban Railroad 98.29 feet to the East line of said tract and at a point . 42.47 feet North of the Southeast corner of same; thence North 617.1 feet to the Northeast corner of said tract; thence West 284.5 feet, more or less, tq a point 374.4 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter said Section, Township and Range; thence Southerly 619.2 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to reservations, easements and restrictions of record, if any, also subject to existing building, zone, and other ordinances, if any. AND . That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, 11innesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 7 rods to the centerline of Glencoe road; thence Southwesterly along said centerline to the south line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence east along said south line to the point of beginning. Subject to Public Road easement. P.I.N. 25-117-23-31-0001 and 25-117-23-34-0001 Exhibit A >~ ~=:r ~ ..... ~g 0..... <t:x:l ~ (') ~ ~ ts > z "} '- ~\, 1{ "~ i tf' t~ ,/ ", ,,- .",; ..-'..-~ ..---.. ..---.. ~~ J/ ~~ " ,/' .i~ .,. '.... i ~~ S-i \1' .) j I ,I I 1" '" f r / i I , " " i~ 1~~~ ~J ,,()- frot}f :t~~ \"', ~~ \ - 0 " ~( . .. H' \,1' S ' :, -\ =--< ' ,~ \ , \ \ .' I I I , \ \ \ \. c \ " \ \ "'" '. ' '. \ ..... \ ", \ \ '.\ \ " '. I \\ \ 1 ~ t' F \, \ , \ \ I \ \ \ \ I I \ ?1"n~ ot +o{'l "1 +-- Q\'i ," ---..- \ \ \ \ \ , I , , , (-.-' .. " f ~ t "ii~ 1=01 H"~ 1=51! ~.z ~. ~ ~ ~ .. . .. n - Q----- t, \ .. 9;t I z;;l i ~! 8 c... . ~1Jl I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~l!! en 200 m z",m c;mj!! )> O~-<C/) -I0:z: )>~g 0 !!l2 ~C/) ()"U O:n Zm oC mS: \J- ~Z Ul)> :n -< jii ..j :' -:.O\J ,\- m :xl ~ <0 ()m"O -5 g z"Om I~o vZ ::g ..l\ ~ t ~~ -< ..... ~ a' en ..... tn...... 0(') (') o ~ ~ ~ z o i 0 ~ 01 "T1 ~ a "T1", l z ~ ~ ReI' : e~ '" - C) l;" Oz r-- ~~ ~ m~ '" :0 ~ P - z f). ~~ 't .. i: ~. ~ r Q ~:~Hj~i\ ~~ .... \I · ~,,~.l i' : 1 It:: ~ t ~: "S ~ \ ~ i i ~." Q II Ht ~ 15 CO i ~ I ~i.J i ~ 2a 1 t. ~~ ~ ~~ ll~ , :>- t c.. !; !l ~ z ;p 3: " ~ rn ~. ,.. :D " 1JI1 0 "' CD ~ . _ :xl Z O. 1 :!i ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ~ . r . ~ .~ ..~~? ../.~ ~~~. . ///../ ~tt'~"J~ . /~ ..l. l' ..' // I '0"" . ./ 1.. . / -;:..: ~ - r v' _0' ~. P ~ -0 (. ~ .~ f'\ '" l~ 9~ c. 0 ~) m::: I\) e ;, f , \ ) ~~ l~ ~ \ \ \ 'a Co ... i " 0 ~ m ~ ~ .... z ~m"' ~ :xl :ml' ~ \_ 0" l!! m< ~ ~ :0 ~ fOri{ I ~ :xl i C/) ------- ;,.-i ::::0 ~c o :j -"--- . o z : ~ '\ 'CJ) m )>. CJ) o "z 7J0 G'> Om ~ "r- oOe zcnm G>m Roc:XJ o !< ~cn z c.:I: ~mo m2c: ;2<0 ~-- z~z 0G') z '"'C ::c o c.. m o -i ARTICLE XIII ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS Section 1. Declarant Riqhts. Notwithstanding any provision of the Declaration or By-Laws to the contrary, the Declarant may operate and maintain upon the Property during the period of construction and sale of the Units such facilities as may be reasonably required or convenient to the construction and sale of the Units, including without limitation a business office, storage area, construction yards, signs, model units and sales office, and shall have easements for access to and enjoyment and use of such facilities for itself, its employees, agent and prospective purchasers. Section 2. Keepinq of Animals. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any Lot or in any Unit, except that dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept, provided they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. The Association may adopt reasonable rules and regulations governing the keeping of pets. Section 3. Signs. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot or in the Common Area, except that the Declarant shall be permitted to erect and maintain upon the Property such signs as it deems appropriate to advertise the development until the Declarant conveys the last Unit. Section 5. Miscellaneous. All sporting equipment, toys, and other equipment and supplies necessary or convenient to residential living shall be enclosed or shall be screened from view. No boats or recreational vehicles shall be stored by an Owner unless stored inside a Garage. In addition, no television or radio antenna shall be erected or placed on the exterior of any Home. -.. ARTICLE XIV SENIOR HOUSING ~ Section 1. Aqe of Residents. This neighborhood is for senior citizens only. all residents must be at least 62 years of age. The only exception to this age limitation is that one caregiver can reside in the residence, if and only if a caregiver is medically necessary and not merely incidental to the living arrangement. Section 2. Number of Residents. The maximum number of residents per unit is two, exclusive of a caregiver. 19 Exhibit D EXCERPT - PROPOSED COVENANTS The Engineer's written report for the Seasons P . U .D. revision has not been prepared and will be presented verbally at the meeting on Monday. . :. 5. N. 2- MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis Bruce Benson CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 20 May 1993 r----;'-- RE: Seasons P.D.D. - Revised Concept Plan/Development Stage Plan FILE NO.: ~_405 (92.23) A staff report, dated 3 May 1993, addressed a number of issues relative to the revised plans for the Seasons P.D.D. The developer has since subl1!itteda second revision which attempts to resolve those issues (see Exhibit A). Following is how the revised plans comply with Shorewood's P.D.D. requirements: . 1. Proposed protective covenants are adequate in terms of restricting occupancy to the elderly. They will have to be modified, -however, to address problems with inadequate space on certain of the units for decks, patios and screen porches. These . will be discussed further in item 2. following. 2. \ -- ~ \ In order to maintain the required spacing between structures the - developer has significantly reduced. the size of space for decks, patios and screen porches. For example the deck areas for units 8 and 9 measure only 3' x 8'. Dnit 13 shows no deck at all. This is viewed as a future problem for the City, as future residents will very likely request variances to increase the size of these spaces. _ The developer is unwilling to modify his unit design because he feels the interior space will be more important to seniors than the decks. Further, each unit is designed with a covered . entryway/porch which provides some room for outside seating. As a compromise in order to maintain the 24 unit density, it has been recommended that decks only be included on units where there is adequate space between structures. For example!>ut a reasonable size deck (at least 8' x 8') on one unit and don't -. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5, H. 3 Re: Seasons P.U.D. Revised Concept PlanlDevelopment Stage Plan 20 May 1993 include a deck on the next one. For units which can not accommodate decks, the protective covenants should include notice that decks, patios 'and screen porches are not available on these units. Building design for those units should include windows rather than doors. / 3. The final plan must be refined to clearly show all structures, including decks, patios and screen porches, at least 13 feet apart.- 4. Access drives have been widened to 24 feet. The center islands in the cul-de-sacs are subject to approval by the City Engineer and Fire Marshal. . 5. Landscaping (Exhibit B) is considered adequate. While very little room exists for landscape screening along the north half of the west side of the site, there is fairly heavy vegetation existing on the site to the west. Consideration should be given to constructing a privacy fence in that location. Also, a final landscape plan should include landscaping enhancement for units 19 and 20 where they look over the rparking/drivewayarea for units 7 and 8. \ It should be noted that the landscape plan calls for bare root trees. Depending on w~en the landscaping is done, this may require balled andburlapped stock. . . 6. Once the developer has received the resolution approving his preliminary plat, he is strongly urged to concentrate on obtaining his approvals from MNDOT (relocation/reconstruction of the storm sewer) and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed /~ District (grading, drainage and erosion control). These approvals are very time- consuming. While the City will assist him to the extent possible, the approvals are his responsibility. ' / 7. The final plat must include "Block 1", and Lot 25 (the common area) should be platted as an 01.ltlot.., , \ , . As a final note, the developer wishes to begin grading prior to fimu plan appr~yal. This grading permit should only be issued subject to the Watershed District's approval of the proposed grading plan, close supervision by the City Engineer,. and the developer providing a cash escrow or letter of credit sufficient to ensure that the site will be restored within a , specified period of time. The City Attorney recommends an escrow agreement between the developer and the City. ~. " cc: Jim Hurro Tim Keane Joel Dresel Pete Boyer Planning Commission - 2 - ~~~ ~~e: ~U'Jg ;d~> ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &: ~ . . \ I ~ III III ii ( ~ : oJ ~ . N~k I "~I:O I 10 III 1- N \<\ \1\ III ~ N 'C\ t. ~ .: .!;l P '" .. 01 ~ /' ~1. . ~~ ,.... -,~ #/- . J Cl<r 0.... en CJ '00 2: >- ., 0.... 3: en . 0...1'- W D: Cii W D: .W enw. ::J"" 0 Z <r C O. Z , W ...I 0 D:' :I: _. . . en w :I: c.. tJ) ~ ..' . -- .-. ~:_..1 \ ~o~ ~\-s ~..,..G o\-Q . ~oA-h 1 I' -:::1/:0 I I ~ ~ ____ ?:~ii~~ ..l ... = . . . . \} _I ;tt ~ ~ iii't ~ ~ 1lI_____ I ~ ~ ! ~. ~. ~ 1: (1 ~ . . - i jUnrO I ~ i );-! II j ~ :2 atil~ ~ ~ iiliil...... ~~ o .... ~ ~~. ~ ~~~ ~ t CJ')t:d trJ tj ~ > ~ CJ') (j > ~ ~ ~ z O"OH ^ "8 SN"~~".l.S Q ,,') c:..;):I .... . - :::!~ a-~ ~ ;;:,:> . _...<l Z"'b o :s-: ..,. tt:t=~~~ WO~::ECO >- :::)1< . I o a:wg'<t rn...9o...... (/)o;t'<t wz..w.. ... O"'lSN W CD:z: ... _~ U ~ .. <<L . .~~.~!~~ ...., !.::I . "D. U ....l: Z .., I: .0'" c 5 ... ~.!.s 0 . ... O' ~u~ !!: t:>! l> 1s. "'-.c ~ ii'- . ~oi~~i'~ . '3.B ~ ~ ~:! ~ ....P~.s . :J:f..s.~. - i.I ; ~ -g ~ ~ ,- ...0 _..;1-L_- . - :r;. <i o f- a: o. z<tt;~~ iiiW~~(7) OD..f-::EM a:~lIlci.t o~o (/)(/)~o""" wCIL;t'<t. ::E z l':l ~ .N .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l . It. J --------- ~ \~.~~ . I i~ v---~~- ~~ -= ~ l ~~ t-. ~ \~'_~X~,- ), ~~~ ~ ! ~ ~ Jf!b.~ ~ IJ"?/J;)""" Y.S:.7 '-1 if /\:::::---.. l~\~b'tn~~~ ~ )_) ~ ~'''' _)ei5'~~_~/'1.... J I;)t\. ~ ~ 'r~~ - ~ ;> ) ~/' l---f I ~ 1..- - - . ~Q .~ ;~<'~' ~J ;,1, v~~ .\~ f ~ ~\-~~~/".., )~I~ ,,/ ~0\ I, . I A 1 <90 /~;:~ -.... ~ ,,/' J 1/ I ~: I ~ '<t 8' ( ~ -- " " .. ~ '\', N 8. I ~~ ~ " r ' ~ \ I 7 ~ "",,, I .'/) } ... - f$'~J;; 0 ~ t1 ~ !~ ~" r--J"f l ? ( ~ N ~~Y-J." '.ff' "'~,-~ ,-VJ ;v~::t-'J . <fJ):liJOJ . ~. ~ r J ~ 7 rr ~. - '/ ~tI-- f ..~ I ~ ~ j , \ ~ ~ I I,; M lrr.~. ~ ); I r; I r ~ l~ ~ ~ --.. ~ ~'J 1 '). I I I ~ ~ . w t ! (~~. I '-. (.,J (/ ('d j-t ~ n ~~~' , t I! 1\' \ vj"~ j / \ )' ~,~~ .' (~- ~r-I1IJ '<t ..~ ~}/'\" I'~~ \ r )~l' .k. @J ~ ','.. \ ~~ /"\ 'i \ ~ V~ \.)~ . -~ '0'~ I Y)..~"'J.-.'\l . 1 \.. t I , . ~ "Ri f'jr ~l~ \C ,. '- ' n I 1 ~ i,J. . 't" ~ ~ ~ " J~ . (/ . -. It)' ~_- . ~ '3J)'/, \" \r'-~~~':p ("1 , ~;:--.. ;: ". "\ 1 ~ ~ ~ . n ' ~" \ ~ S \ ~l r' M' 'lh.~"'~~....N \' ~ Ji.-J- .' '. 8 ~ -t, J . ~j I~ \'\~~~~~ ~B1 ') 3 ~{ ~ <t) .." '~k}'ff ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ,r ~ \\., . \\& \ i~ . N 1\._ ~ 0 ''\ \ ~l t' ~ A~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ N ~ : <. \' \~ -:- . N . \ ~ Ji '\ .. ,ll t..,f'b- i. . \ ,,'. ~ " \.. I -' ~ /' """- '"",- \ '. '" .... . . \ ~ ... \,.-1.1 ~ ~l ~ . ~.:.' . - .. .L 'ill t 7. ~. i /\ l - ~ ) I ~~ k".-t/'f ~ \\,.~, ~ ~ 11 \ ~...~, co " ~{~! ~ if ,,~:\. ) , ~ _I \} I ~ ... ~ ~. b!~ r;< , --- .\ I I , f ' ~--.. \:;' ~ 0)' :: k .~\ -. , tI ~ ~,~ ~J" ~ / 6~ It ~~" 'l):};~~/AP-~1~'--_~\- 1 \/IV?' . ~r{U ---V.'-:.:::\ \) J ~ '" ~ '>(fj6~/ T:'r\ ~ / /- at" ~ "'<j, \i\.! ------ ~ \ ~ ~ ~f'l\ :A..~1 ~~' I; / j :, ) :f -~ ~ 1~~ }~~~~~ f. .~ l~ ~ . I~ ~ ~J;S ~ ..:.-/C/-.r ,'... :.' ~ ) O.! ~'~~.:-to~oll \~;,o'vV:)~~ . ~-~l~~J" ~~~~~;, ~: '\ t ]T,~V7J' ~o. .~~~\~ ~ ~;t ,,, ! ;: ) ,,~/' . ,/ , ~.~./.~ ~l t,;~/ / ~ / \ i~" - 1.n o~~ ~ <> r I ~ I~ \~l~ _)IS>.N- A /\ ~------ 'i ~~. \ rl~\.~ KJt.~~~' .~~ : ~~ f \ '~-~. ~\-- ~\t7~ ,", ~,~ I '"'" I" ./ ~ k . \ ~~. v~. \ 1~ I ~ d~. --- ~ 3~ ., <1: 'f' f \ ~ ~ I ~ .~ 1 ~:''' i ~!! " ~ 0--- ,.-/.-I.t - ~ 1 J I en lit I~' Ifb..Ji ~~~, ! ~:, $ ~ ",,\G~ '0\. ..J I ~~~ ~ .' I .' \ I \ . ~ :1 I~ ~l ~ t . \-- . I~ ~. ~. . . . . MAY 20 '93 11:12 OSM MPLS, MN P.l May 20, 1993 Q'~U =& ~ WI. AsSodaU's,Inc. 300 Park Place Center 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55416-1228 612-595-5775 1-800-753.5775 FAX 595-5774 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 CountIy Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Engineers Arcnitects Planners Surveyors Re: Award of Bid Rehabilitation of lift Stations 9 & 10 OSM File 5066.00 Dear Mayor and Council Members: We received bids on the referenced project yesterday, and a tabulation of the bid results are attached. The lowest bidder was GHT Construction. Inc. in the amount of $57,440.00. The remainder of the bids ranged as high as $80,600.00. Based on the bids received last year for a somewhat similar project, we had budgeted $75,000.00 for construction and contingencies and another $15,000.00 for design and construction observation, for a total of $90,000.00 on this years project. Based on the bids received, projected design and observation fees of $101000.00, and a contingency of $2,000.00 (3%), the revised budget is estimated at $69,440.00. GHT Construction is apparently a fairly new firm, and we have never worked with them before. However, we have received favorable recommendations on the owner, and have not uncovered any negative recommendations with regard to either the firm or the owner. Unless new information is obtained between now and the Council Meeting, we recommend awarding the bid to GRT Construction, Inc., in the amount of $57,440.00. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES (j /1// //! ;/ 1~ /~~ Joel A. Dresel~ P .E., L.S. City Engineer ........ - --.-... _. -.......- ... ....-- 'ttal memO 7671 Post It'" brand fax uansm\ n I I - , . Fro~ be To .N ;: LJJ.riEP Co. ca. c: EHA Fsx" PhOne 11 Fax' Equal Opporwtllty Employe! (t) MAY 20 '93 11:04 OSM MPLS, MN ~ 8 o ~ .... CD Cl) .... ci ~ II) >. ~ ~ '0 i;' c '0 o = iii ~ c: CI) Q) ;B Q .... d z c ~ Cl) o z (fJ z o i= ~ (J) 0 Ii: ~ -....<0 ..J.o 11.""10 00) . 1-0 zoz OUJ~ --'0 !;cow ~a::~ -a.o :::!c::ct. mwa.. ~~:e W:>(I) 0::00 cI) a ~ % ~ I- g . ~ e:::CI(I!"" w< c~ co ~ - ~ l! co~:vQ. ~~ ~ ~ U) ~ ~ :;) . ~ ~ o e: ..... Z o. E e::: -_ ~ ~ w 2 .. 00 c::i 8 a) e :Si if %:a:l_ I-~i~ -q,u.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:::::1 ! "" UJ~ Cz 90 coo CO e:::~Oi C") ll.. ~ s i! if "" ! z ..( ::z:: o W cr :=. ~t; OW ffi~ o~ z~ NZ ~ ~ ~ ! II> ... .~ ::2 Co CD JlI 'iii c: ! => a ~ ;. 'E 0::: ~ t; :! w = .. a : at; co B ~ 3:0 ii Co o~ ; ~ ...H'!) ~ o o ~ w ct. o ~ (J) tJ.. o ~ <3 ... c: :l ~ '2! '" '" o .. .12 ~ ~ i ... ~ lit ~ 2 ~~~~ ~~~e ~w~(.) lAi=~~ :1:~ai ~(I):55',! ~~i~ ~~%a:: ~::i~~ ~ ~ !i a 8 ... ~ Z\ ~ .... ;; ~ ~ ,; ~ ~ 'i 8. ... ~ i 8- Ie N a> N 8. .... ... ~ ~I ; ~ P.2 ~ 8. !i ~- ! 8. 8 6 ... 8. 8 ~e: :II ~ . ... 8. ~ <'I. ~ ~ 8. ~ i I') . i 8. ~ ~ 8.8 ~ ~ a>~ 4" fA ... a ! IN ; ~ ~;. IN a 8. g cD 1'1 8. !i ~ IN ~ ~ (I) a. ~ ;:) -' a. :i ::. -' ... IA <( s ~ g ~w~tn n~! ...lU~~ ~~lL~ Ch"'O~ ~~g~ ;t ~(I)~ (I) 6 :ci~~ I- ~~~ct i ~:i~:t ~ '" .~ . . ..... "- o .... <1l C) cu a. . . . . . . MAY 20 '93 12: 53 0511 MPL5, MI'l P.l BID TABUIATION FOR REHABILIT ATlON OF UFf STATIONS NO. 9 AND NO. 10 FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 93-1 BIDS OPENED: May 19, 1993 ORR-SCHELEN-N1A YERON 10:00 a.m. & ASSOCIATES, INC. .;;~~'~i~:i~!-il;1~::[ji;~~~:i~~~:::2t[.~:~:~;j;:~gQHm~()~:.?1::[~:~:~~:~i~'t:~~'~:;:.;::~~::i~":-...;:; ...!~lj3~PtSEC.~~.:1:::'. ti:E;jToTxJ52BID~:;];S;:; :.~:~~~:':::::::...,..,-:..... :....:" ".:.:. ". :'-.", ;;::~:::::::':~:~'; OHT CONST., me. 5% BID BOND $57,440.00 NORTIlWEST MECHANICAL, INC. 5% BID BOND $59,233.00 FORD CONSTR. 5% BID BON!> $69,605.00 F. F. JEDUCKI 5% BID BOND $70,017.00 BARBAROSSA & SONS 5% BID BOND $80,600.00 .. --..- ... - I HEREBY CERTIFY 11!AT THIS IS A TRUE A..7\ID CORRECI' TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RECEIVED ON: DATE: .j1 J' 1~3 p" BY: / u '/k.- Joel Dresel. P.E. City Engineer /Joel Dresel, P.E. OSM Project No. 5066.00 ,. . . . . MAY 20 '93 11:06 OSM MPLS, MN P.4 RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR REHABILITATION OF LIFT STATIONS NO.9 AND 10 CIIT PROJECt NO. 93.1 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for local improvements designated as Rehabilitation of lift Stations No.9 and 10, project 93.1, bids were received, opened on May 19, 1993, and tabulated according to law, such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council has designated that GRT Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Sborewood as follows: 1. That tbe Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with GHT Construction, Inc. in the name of the City of Shorewood, Project No. 93-1 according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except for the deposits of the successful bidder and next lowest bidder, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CI1Y COUNCIL, of the City of Sborewood, this 24th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator jClerk Barbara J. Brancel Mayor MEMORANDUM LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. 1500 Norwost Financial Center 7900 XerKOlI Avonllo South Bloomington, Minnesota $$431 (612) U5-3S00 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Brancel and Members of the City Council Tim Keane, City Attorney RE: May 20, 1992 Sewer Backup Claim 19625 Sweetwater Curve . City Administrator Jim Hurm requested that I review the above-referenced claim and advise the City Council of my Jassessment of potential liability issues and possible courses Of action. The claim has been the subject of an investigation by Robert S. Brown of Allied Adjusters, Inc. Allied Adjusters is affiliated with Berkley Risk Services, the servicing agent for the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (MLCIT). Allied concluded that the sewer backup was not the result of a negligence on the part of the City or a defect in a City facility. Further, the Allied investigation concluded that the facility defect was related to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) manhole and that the claim for this casualty should be directed to the MWCC. The MWCC has been put on notice of the claim and I have further requested the MWCC to respond to this claim. . I did contact Mr. Bonach and inquire if he had tendered this casualty claim to his homeowner insurance carrier. Mr. Banach said he had not and that he did not intend to because he did not want to pay additional premiums as a result of this claim. . On the basis of the investigation undertaken by Allied on behalf of the City'S insurer, LMCIT, it appears that the City does not have liability for the casualty. r qualify this conclusion to the extent that further expert inquiry may conclude a different response on the issue of causation. I have contacted the LMCIT t.o request. t.hat they cover: this claim and submit a demand to the insurance carrier of the MWCC. At the same time, I have contacted the MWCC to request that their carrier cover this claim. It is my hope that prior to the City Council meeting I will have additional information to assist the Council. cc:Jarnes C. Hurm, City Administrator TJK:JTOs 1 CK NO CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MAY 24, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MAY 7. 1993 11457 11458 11459 11460 11461 11462 11463 11464 11465 11466 11467 11468 .11469 1470 1471 11472 11473 11474 11475 11476 11477 11478 11479 11480 11481 11482 11483 11484 11485 .486 487 11488 11489 11490 11491 11492 11493 11494 11495 11496 11497 11498 11499 11500 11501 11502 11503 11504 (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) Void Pera Medcenter Health Plan Medica Choice Group Health, Inc. League of Mn cities Mn Mutual Life Commercial Life Ins. AFSCME Council #14 Mn state Treasurer Mn state Treasurer Northern States Power Northern States Power Petty Cash Kenneth Potts Mr. Michael Simpson US West Communications WMI svcs of Mn Waterpro Bellboy Corporation Boyd Houser Candy/Tobac. Midwest Coca-Cola Bottlg Copier Alternatives Day Distributing East Side Bev Co. Griggs, Cooper and Co. Hoops Trucking Johnson Brothers Liquor Mark VII Mn Bar Supply North Star Ice Pepsi-Cola Co. Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Thorpe Distributing Mn Power Center Void First State Bank Commiss of Revenue Pera ICMA Retirement Trust City cty Credit Union Child Support Enforcmt Anoka cty Spt/Collectns Airsignal, Inc. Wendy Davis Finaserve, Inc. Patricia Helgesen Continued next page Payroll deductions May health insurance May health insurance May health insurance May dental insurance May disability insurance May life insurance May delta dental 1st qtr bldg permit surcharge Recertification-D Randall Street light utilities utilities Mileage/supplies/parking April prosecutions Recycling award Telephone service Waste removal Water meter supplies Liquor purchases Mise/supplies purchases Misc purchases Copier maint contract Beer and misc purchases Beer and misc purchases Liquor,wine,misc purch Liquor and wine purch Liquor and wine purch Beer and misc purchases Mise/supplies purchases Mise purchases Mise purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor,wine,misc purch Beer and misc purchases PW-Vehicle maint supplies Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Beeper service See 125 reimbursement Gasoline purchases See 125 reimbursement -1- 42.00 1,021.40 4,383.16 1,192.44 403.00 85.50 50.15 224.00 1,288.00 15.00 1,976.90 1,840.89 53.67 1,458.33 300.00 153.02 578.00 1,378.17 1,550.55 1,455.92 335.05 30.00 5,811.60 7,994.05 8,493.02 508.90 2,542.70 5,394.95 62.68 116.40 324.00 2,153.48 3,179.26 . 7,939.70 13.93 5,757.34 964.62 2,020.27 641. 57 320.00 92.50 126.50 9.58 215.00 342.59 425.00 J I CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MAY 24, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MAY 7, 1993 (Continued) 11505 (G) Cellular Telephone Co. Cellular phone air time 10.92 11506 (G) Bradley Nielsen See 125 reimbursement 499.00 11507 (G) Northern States Power utilities 2,243.71 11508 (G) Joseph Pazandak Mileage 70.05 11509 (G) Daniel Randall See 125 reimbursement 82.00 11510 (G) Twin City Storm Sash Bldg permit refund 40.50 11511 (G) Sam's Club Membership renewal 65.00 11512 (G) US West Communications Telephone service 48.93 11513 (G) Chicago Title S/A overpayment refund 1,380.58 11514 (G) S Fawcett/D Watson Recycling award 25.00 11515 (L) Bureau-Alcohol,Tobac,F/A Special occutional tax 500.00 11516 (L) Bellboy Corporation Liquor purchases 3,197.17 11517 (L) Griggs, Cooper and Co. Liquor,wine,misc purchases 3,204.67 . 11518 (L) Johnson Brothers Liquor Liquor and wine purch 3,090.11 11519 (L) Mn Bar Supply Mise/supplies purch 164.56 11520 (L) Ed Phillips and Sons Liquor and wine purch 3,307.58 11521 (L) Pogreba Distributing Beer and mise purch 2,590.35 11522 (L) Quality Wine/Spirits Liquor,wine,misc purch 1,748.33 11523 (L) Ryan Properties Easter promotion exp 168.88 11524 (G) Superamerica Gasoline purchases 291.44 TOTAL GENERAL 32,129.66 TOTAL LIQUOR 65.863.91 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED 97.993.57. -2- ~ CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MAY 24, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED AMOUNT CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 11525 11526 11527 11528 11529 11530 11531 11532 11533 11534 11535 11536 ~537 538 1539 11540 11541 void A.G. Electric Earl F. Andersen Aspen Equipment J Reinhart-Assured Offc Barton Sand and Gravel Biffs, Inc. Bryan Rock Products Dem-Con Landfill Rolf E.A. Erickson Feed-Rite Controls Financial Product Corp Gopher State One-Call Hoisington Koegler Grp Hopkins Parts Knutson Services Larkin, Hoffman,... 11542 11543 11544 11545 11546 11547 11548 . Metro Waste Control Mn Sun Publications Mueller Sales Corp. Munitech Inc. Navarre Amoco Navarre True Value Orr, Schelen, Mayeron... 11549 11550 11551 11552 11553 11554 So Lk Mtka Pub Sfty Dept Southam Business Commun Time Saver Off site Sec Twin Cities Water Clinic Unitog, Inc. Witt Financial PURPOSE Disconnect elect-w/h Street signs Air hose maint April janitorial Dumping fee Satellite rental Rock supplies Dumping fee June assessing fee/supplies Demurrage charge Computer cable One call svcs Park planning svcs Vehicle maint supplies April recycling March legal fees general 5202.28 develop. 675.00 pk ref 54.00 church rd 901.90 mwcc 561.00 June contract paYment Publishing Well maint supplies June contract paYment Tire repair Maint supplies March engineering fees general 6552.14 develop 1554.66 lift stns 2725.52 June contract paYment Publishing Minutes April water testing Uniform laundry svcs Investment svcs TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST -3- 35.00 126.20 54.41 295.00 105.00 522.76 2,799.44 31. 50 3,178.37 25.00 69.02 44.50 298.20 258.48 3,893.40 7,394.18 30,795.67 64.98 228.97 6,200.00 12.00 66.26 10,832.32 32,468.64 159.84 306.75 20.00 370.44 140.36 100.796.69 198.790.26 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MAY 24, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR MAY 18. 1993 PAYROLL 207331 Void 207332 (L) Scott Bartlett 19.0 reg hours 109.67 207333 (G) Charles Davis 82.0 reg hours 602.97 207334 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 720.16 207335 (L) Cory Frederick 57.5 reg hours 250.25 207336 (L) John Fruth 16.5 reg hours 91.15 207337 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 633.07 207338 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,540.97 207339 (L) Brian Jakel 32.75 reg hours 178.97 207340 (G) Dennis Johnson 74.0 reg hours 720.30 207341 (L) Loren Jones 15.5 reg hours 78.63 207342 (L) Martin Jones 12.75 reg hours 46.53 207343 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 630.22 207344 (L) Mark Karsten 40.0 reg hours 206.44. 207345 (L) Sandra Klomps 6.0 reg hours 31.31 207346 (G) Mary Knopik 32.0 reg hours 174.34 207347 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 859.35 207348 (L) Susan Latterner 31.25 reg hours 169.43 207349 (G) Colleen Lindskoog 31.0 reg hours 163.90 207350 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours 754.37 207351 (L) Russell Marron 28.0 reg hours 154.39 207352 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 804.07 207353 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 702.25 207354 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 953.51 207355 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 1,033.73 207356 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours 785.94 207357 (L) Brian Roerick 6.75 reg hours 38.96 207358 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,225.31 207359 (L) Brian Rosenberger 38.0 reg hours 195.89 207360 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours .388.36. 207361 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours 665.90 207362 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 40.0 reg hours 300.62 207363 (G) Ralph Wehle 82.0 reg hours 652.51 207364 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 614.44 207365 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1.189.45 TOTAL GENERAL 14,482.72 TOTAL LIQUOR 3.184.64 TOTAL PAYROLL 17.667.36 -4- ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MONDAY, HAY 24, 1993 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. BOARD OF REVIEW AGENDA 1. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW (from May 12, 1993 meeting) A. Roll Call Daugherty Lewis Mayor Braneel Benson Stover 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Board of Review Minutes - will be on the June 14, 1992 agenda 3. RECONVENE THE BOARD OF REVIEW (Att.No.3-Assessor's Report) 4. ADJOURN BOARD OF REVIEW AND CONVENE THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JCH.al 5/18/93 a{2 ;.., J A j;~ i .//:_/.,...?,,:'/ / c;:r....~. j ? _ - -4 / \... Cj(/'-</ i~_Y/,(/'_L 20 :t 'Ill ~ 19 March 1993 Mayor Barbara Brancel City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Barb: I understand that the matter of gas pumps at the Vine Hill Market will be coming before the City Council next Monday. I urge you and the other council members to support Brad Nielsen's recommendation for a change to the ordinance which would allow Mr. Pyle to count the places at the pumps as part of the total number of parking places. I believe that the improvements Mr. Pyle has proposed, particularly the elimination of both the steep grade in front of his store and the short cut from the frontage road to Vine Hill Road through his parking lot, warrant the change to the ordinance. I also understand the change to the ordinance will bring the ordinance into conformity with those of other communities which have already recognized the uniqueness of a small neighborhood convenience store which also has gas pumps. I have spoken with several of the nearby residents and they all, without exception, feel that the addition of gas pumps at Vine Hill Market would be a tremendous asset for the area. Since Mr. Pyle bought the Market, I have seen many improvements in the operation. It is my opinion that the City of Shorewood should do everything that is reasonable and proper in order to insure the continuance of community minded business owners such as Mr. Pyle. ~-S'ncerely yours, i 'tAPQ \,-______ , Ja es D. Andrus 4971 Kensington Gate Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 ,. /' "" CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 4, 1993 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Rosenberger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Rosenberger; Commissioners Bean, Bonach, Borken, Hansen, and Malam; Planning Director Nielsen and Council Liaison Lewis. Absent: Commissioner Pisula. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Borkon moved, Malam seconded to approve the minutes of the Commission's April 20, 1993 meeting. Motion passed 6/0. 1 . SIMPLE SUBDIVISION Aoolicant: Location: Excelsior Covenant Church 19955 Excelsior Boulevard Chair Rosenberger announced the application of the Excelsior Covenant Church for a simple subdivision at 19955 Excelsior Boulevard. Nielsen reviewed the background to the Church's request stating that the Church has agreed to sell a small triangle of the southwest corner of its site to Pete Boyer, developer of the Seasons senior housing project. Boyer arranged the purchase of approximately 113 acre of the church's property in order to accommodate 24 units in the project. This transaction will have no effect on the value of the church's property and will in fact straighten the property line perpendicular to the highway. Staff recommends approval of the application. Malam moved, Bean seconded to recommend to the Council that it approve the simple subdivision/combination for the Excelsior Covenant Church, 19955 Excelsior Boulevard, subject to the applicant recording the transaction with the County Recorder within 30 days of the Council's approval. Motion passed 6/0. 1 " PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 2 2. 7:10 PUBLIC HEARING - REVISED CONCEPT PLAN/DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN APPROVAL - SEASONS P.U.D. Aoolicant: Location: Pete Boyer Construction 20095 Excelsior Boulevard Chair Rosenberger outlined the procedures for a Public Hearing and announced the case. Nielsen stated that the Council granted concept stage approval for an elderly housing project called Seasons in November 1992, subject to certain recommendations of the Planning Commission. Two major issues have arisen in connection with preparation of the development stage plans: 1) complying with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 requirements and 2) designing around an existing MNDOT storm sewer easement which cuts through the site. These issues have resulted in substantial redesign of the project. Nielsen noted that the developer has arranged to purchase approximately 1/3 of an acre from the Excelsior Covenant Church and is negotiating for an easement from the Church for drainage purposes. Despite the additional property, the developer has had difficulty fitting 24 units on the site. Nielsen compared the revised plan with the approved concept plan and reviewed a number of issues (detailed in his memorandum dated May 3, 1993) which require additional information. Nielsen recommended that the Commission table action on this application until the necessary information is received. Mr. Pete Boyer, the applicant, stated that the issues discussed by Nielsen have been addressed and the required information will be submitted by May 11, including changes resulting from acquisition of the small piece of property from the Excelsior Covenant Church. He stated that prior consideration by the City Engineer resulted in informal acceptance of 20' access driveways. Boyer pointed out that the driveways will be privately owned and maintained, it is anticipated that parking will not be allowed in the driveways, there will be a low-density traffic pattern, that turn-around space exceeds that required by the Fire Marshall, and that it is reasonable to provide 20 foot driveways vs. the recommended 24' driveways to provide more green space than blacktop in the development. He described the agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for drainage plans and discussions with MNDOT regarding the storm sewer easement. Chair Rosenberger opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m. there being no comments from the public. Hansen requested clarification regarding the width of the access driveways. Nielsen stated that the Code does not require a 24' width. However, since the development does not have any additional parking, it appears impractical for residents to solve parking problems by using adjoining resident's driveways when more than 2 vehicles may be present at anyone unit. A 24' driveway would accommodate parking and allow two cars to pass each other. He acknowledged that while the minimum acceptable width under the Fire Code is 20', that width is not adequate due to 2 " PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 3 insufficient additional parking in the develQpment. Hansen moved, Borkon seconded to continue the Public Hearing regarding the Revised Concept Plan/Development Stage Plan Approval - Seasons P.U.D. to the May 18 Planning Commission meeting, providing the Applicant can provide the required information no later than May 11. . Motion passed 6/0. 3. 7:30 PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - BATESON WILSON ADDITION Aoolicant: Location: . Rick Bateson South of Murray Street and East of Galpin Lake Road Chair Rosenberger announced the case and outlined the procedures for a Public Hearing. Nielsen reviewed the background to the request of Mr. Rick Bateson for approval of a preliminary plat for approximately 5.6 acres of land located south of Murray Street and east of Galpin Lake Road. Mr. Bateson proposes to divide the property into 4 single-family residential lots. The property is zoned R-1 C, single family residential,contains 243,485 square feet of area, and is characterized by a dramatic change in grading, dropping 63' from east to west. A designated wetland occupies approximately 46,500 square feet of the westerly side of the site. The proposed lots range in area from 22,300 square feet to 57,100 square feet (exclusive of wetlands) and average 41,250 square feet. Nielsen reviewed the issues related to the zoning and subdivision requirements and the staff analysis as detailed in his memorandum dated April 27, 1993. He noted that Lot 2 does not comply with the width requirements of the R-1 C zoning and recommended that an adjustment be made to widen that lot to the required 100 feet at the front building line. Nielsen referred to the Engineer's report dated April 29, 1993 which outlines issues to be addressed regarding storm and sanitary sewers, street, and grading. Nielsen stated the preliminary plat is generally consistent with Shorewood's development requirements and recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions and recommendations of the staff. Nielsen referred to letters received from concerned residents regarding various street- related issues and commented on the issues raised. Street-related issues will be addressed in conjunction with the final plans. Nielsen stated that the City will acquire additional right-of-way on Murray Street as a result of this subdivision. Nielsen stated that an 18" storm sewer culvert will be required for installation at this project. The Commission acknowledged receipt of a letter from Nancy and Steve Feller, 22535 Murray Street and Richard Sanders, 22540 Murray Street dated April 29, 1993, and a letter from Warren E. Phillips, 22630 Murray Street, dated May 3, 1993, regarding the application. 3 " PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 4 Mr. Rick Bateson, co-developer of the project with Jay Wilson, addressed the staff's recommendation regarding the less than required 95' width of Lot 2 and requested that rather than making the adjustment with Lot 1, Lots 2, 3 and 4 be equalized because of problems regarding building pads and drainage. Bateson referred to Engineer Dresel's recommendation that concrete curbs and gutters be installed and requested that bituminous curbs and gutters be allowed because of the relatively small size of the project, and the use of concrete would add unnecessary expense to the project. In general, Bateson indicated there would be no problems in conforming with the recommendations outlined by the staff. Bateson requested approval of the preliminary plat based on consistency with the City'S requirements, the project will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties, and it is the intent of the developer to minimize the impact on the neighborhood during the development and construction phases, and the development will be an asset to the community. He requested the opportunity to comment on neighbors' remarks. Chair Rosenberger opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. Tom Londo, 22695 Murray Street, stated his property adjoins this project and although he supports the development, he described concerns related to traffic on Murray Street and the new road, including poor site visibility and a dangerous hill. Londo indicated that while the development may meet Code requirements, 3 rather than 4 homes would be more reasonable given the traffic and drainage problems. He referred to another home to be built on a lot for sale in the area. He stated that given the large wetland area and traffic conditions, 5 new homes in the area does not make sense to him. William Cook, 22845 Murray Street, stated that his residence is the second home to the east of Galpin Lake Road. He reiterated Londo's concerns regarding the large wetland and existing drainage problems in the area which will be exacerbated by the addition of four residences in that development plus the fifth planned home. Cook reiterated Londo's concerns related to traffic problems in the area. Cook expressed concern regarding the impact of five new wells in the area and potential water problems. Jerry Cox, 6200 Cardinal Road, stated his property adjoins Lot 4. He reiterated concerns regarding the wetlands and the blind hill on Murray Street and stated a head- on accident has occurred there. Cox questioned the developers' future intention regarding the road and the setbacks regarding his lot line. Joan Bolin, representing the South portion of the site, stated her property is located in Carver County, City of Chanhassen. She noted that requirements differ within Counties and municipalities and she was unable to subdivide 6-3/4 acres she purchased in 1982. Her purchase of the property was to maintain the wetlands as a natural area for wild life. She expressed concern regarding the aesthetics of the area and described her concerns related to water flow from the higher elevations to the pond and it's relationship to the proposed road. Bolin supported fewer homesites 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 5 in the area. Jeff Papke, 6180 Cardinal Road, stated he owns parcels 88 and 89 on Cardinal Road. He agreed with the concerns expressed regarding the street safety issues and high elevation, wild life with particular concern for displacement of the deer herd, run-off which is at best acceptable at the present time and questioned the area of the wetland and buildable area on the property. Chair Rosenberger closed the Public Hearing at 8 p.m. At Barkan's request to demonstrate that issues are addressed during the staff analysis of applications, Nielsen reviewed and described the application procedure required for preliminary and final plat approval. Nielsen described the parameters of the wetlands area designated and protected by the City Code and noted that the wetlands may actually be larger. He stated that detailed run-off calculations will be made and studied in connection with consideration of the final plat review. He explained that the protected wetland area is subtracted from the buildable area of the property, that the City must abide by the Wetland Conservation Act regulations, and that approval by the City is subject to final review and approval by the Minnehaha Watershed District. Nielsen clarified that any changes in the easements for the wetland area will not change the size of the buildable area of the property. Borkon requested clarification regarding the site distance, speed limit and blind spot on Murray Road. Nielsen explained that review of the final grading plans will include study of those issues and suggested that if the problems described by the residents exist, the City may wish to undertake a study independent of consideration of this development. Bateson indicated that the minimum size of the homes is 2200 square feet and that he is both the builder and developer of the project. Nielsen stated that the minimum road width is 24' and indicated that a traffic study has not been conducted in the subject area. He noted that the paved surface diameter of the cul-de-sac provided by the plans exceeds the required minimum. Rosenberger requested clarification on the staff's recommendation regarding concrete curbs and gutters. Nielsen stated that the Ordinance only requires use of concrete where City water is provided therefore bituminous is acceptable. Malam indicated support for curbing and expressed confidence that the staff will assure that proper drainage will be provided. With regard to aesthetics, Malam indicated that although preservation of the natural state is preferred, improvements to property owned by individuals must be allowed. He indicated that the addition of 4 homes in the area would have minimal impact on traffic, that sight lines can be 5 , PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 6 improved to alleviate hazardous conditions and that according to the plans, the building sites are located significantly distant from the marshy areas. Bean expressed concern regarding the buildable area of Lot 1, which may technically meet the requirements, however, in terms of reasonable building sites, he supported re-configuration of the lots to accommodate 3 homes rather than 4. He also noted that adequate erosion control must be provided given the slope of the hill. Nielsen indicated adequate erosion control is required in the final plat as well as under building permit requirements. Nielsen discussed the buildability of Lot 1 and described a possible placement of a home and garage on the lot and confirmed that the Lot is buildable in terms of square footage of area. Nielsen stated that while approval must be based on facts, the legal implications of denying approval of 4 home sites on the property must be addressed by the City Attorney. The Commission may, of course, require the developer to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission the buildability of a home on Lot 1. Nielsen stated that a review will be conducted of the builder's request to reconfigure the Lots. Bonach supported the proposal and stated that the builder has met the requirements of the City's Codes. Hansen stated that while he found it difficult to visualize how the property will accommodate the proposed development, he expressed confidence in the expertise of the staff and the abilities of other supporting technical experts to ensure adequate protection of the wetlands and resolution of other issues. He generally supported approval of the development. Rosenberger expressed concern regarding the drainage and erosion control and requested that those detailed plans be provided to the Commission prior to approval of the final plat. In addition, he expressed concern regarding traffic problems and the water situation. Nielsen stated that the City does not intend to extend City water to this location at the present time. He stated that the Engineer will address the matter of additional private wells and noted that in general the influence of a private well does ,not extend into the surrounding area and there is very little impact on the level of the water table. Hansen requested clarification regarding the setback requirements under the R-1 C zoning. Nielsen stated that the easements for the wetland area exceed the required setbacks. Rosenberger expressed concern regarding the impact on the residents of assessments for improvements that may be undertaken on Murray Street due to this development. Lewis stated that while current policy would not allow that, an assessment policy is being studied that would provide for assessment of road improvements. Hansen 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 7 stated that this development should have no bearing on the current status of Murray Street. Bean moved, Borkon seconded to recommend to the Council that it approve the preliminary plat for Rick Bateson for approximately 5.6 acres of land located south of Murray Street and east of Galpin lake Road, subject to the recommendations of the Planning Director, subject to the recommendations of the Engineer including the impact of 4 additional wells on the surrounding neighborhood, and subject to the condition that the Planning Commission review and approve the building footprint and landscaping of lot 1 as provided in the final plat. Motion passed 6/0. Chair Rosenberger noted that residents may submit additional comments regarding this application. in writing to the City Council prior to its consideration of the application at its May 24 meeting. Bonach moved, Malam seconded to recommend that the City request that a traffic study including the concerns expressed by the residents be conducted on Murray Street. Motion passed 6/0. The meeting recessed at 8:40 p.m. and reconvened at 8:45 p.m. 4. 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENIENCE STORES WITH GAS PUMPS Nielsen stated that at its April 6 meeting, the Planning Commission directed the staff to research parking requirements for convenience stores with accessory gas pumps. He noted that during review of the Vine Hill Market C.U.P. it was questioned whether the current Code may be outdated with respect to such uses. Nielsen reviewed the research conducted noting that a number of communities which have updated their zoning ordinances do not require additional parking spaces for convenience stores with gas pumps. While Nielsen did not agree with the ordinance, he noted that at least three outer ring suburbs allow spaces at the pumps to be counted as part of the required parking. He agreed there was justification, however, to not require additional spaces because of the gas pumps, but felt it was necessary to provide the required number of spaces for the store. If amended, the Ordinance would apply to any convenience store in a zoning district which allowed it. Nielsen referred to statistics relative to convenience stores that indicate that most stores are between 2000 and 3000 square feet and most have between 1 and 10 parking spaces. He noted that Brooks' Superette standard stores have 3000 square feet with 15 parking spaces, that parking shortages are never 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 8 experienced and that about 50% of their sales were to people purchasing gas. Stacking space and site circulation appears to be more important than extra parking. Chair Rosenberger opened and closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m. there being no comments from the public. Bean requested clarification of the comparison of space per square footage with other ordinances. Nielsen stated that one for 200 is a standard for retail and office space whereas higher ratios would be required for restaurants. Bean moved, Borkon seconded to not amend the Ordinance as stipulated, i.e., the zoning text amendment not be implemented. Malam stated that the amendment as proposed does not go far enough. He noted convenience stores are a new type of land use that did not exist when the Ordinance was adopted and that as a City it is important to be cognizant of change and be flexible to accommodate new uses as they may appear. Bean, Borkon and Bonach agreed with Malam's concern. Bean suggested that it is important that issues related to land use be thoroughly discussed and considered. Borkon agreed that the issue be considered as a whole rather than on a reactionary basis. Bonach stated that variance requests must be made because the City's Ordinances are not up to date. Rosenberger also pointed out that it will be important to consider whether Shorewood wishes to include the proliferation of convenience stores/gas pumps within the City. Motion passed 4/2. Malam and Bonach voted nay. 5. VINE HILL MARKET- C.U.P. AND VARIANCES (Tabled from Aoril 6) Aoolicant: Location: James Pyle 19215 State Highway 7 Chair Rosenberger noted that consideration of this issue was tabled at the April 6 meeting. Nielsen stated that subsequent to the tabling of the applicant's C.U.P./variance request, a revised site plan designed to eliminate the front yard setback variance has been submitted by Mr. Pyle. The plan now complies with the 15' front setback. Two of the 4 spaces which had been located on the north side of the site have been relocated to the northeast of the building resulting in 11 parking spaces for the site still short two spaces of the required 13 spaces. Nielsen indicated that an additional parking space suggested by the Applicant's engineer behind the building would not be a quality parking space because of the inability to see around the building. The one-way circulation pattern around the building allowed for the paved area to the east 8 " PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 9 of the building to be converted to green space. Nielsen stated that considerable improvements have been made to the site plan, however since the Commission did not approve amending the Ordinance to reduce the number of parking spaces required, granting a variance does not appear justified since a hardship does not exist. He stated that the Commission must decide whether the improvements balance with the approvals necessary to allow the sale of gas in the operation. Mr. Pyle stated that his principal use is that of a convenience store, the addition of gas service is for the convenience of the neighborhood and the gas operation would be relatively small in comparison to the "big pumpers." Bonach requested clarification regarding the required number of parking spaces on the site. Nielsen stated that the Ordinance adopted in 1985 requires 9 spaces for the size of the convenience store and 4 more spaces for the service stalls. Borkon requested information regarding the proposed upgrading of the Vine Hill intersection. Nielsen indicated that contracts will be let in the Fall of 1993 with work to begin in the Spring of 1994. He noted that MNDOT has also suggested that the City consider upgrading of the service road east of the location to tie in with upgrading to be done by Minnetonka in that area. Nielsen also stated his concerns regarding the quality of proposed parking on the site with regard to accessing the gas pumps safely. Malam moved, Borkon seconded to recommend to the Council that it approve a C.U.P. and variances for the number of parking spaces for the Vine Hill Market project. Bean expressed concern regarding the granting of variances which do not meet the policy criteria set forth by the Commission for granting variances which results inconsistent guidelines. Malam agreed with Bean's concern, however, he indicated that applications must be reviewed on a case by case basis. He supported granting the variance in this case in view of the substantial improvements to the property including eliminating the cut- through and closing of an entrance outweigh the negative factors. Borkon stated that the point of a variance is to allow individuals to upgrade a property in a manner that may not be acceptable under the Ordinances and that by following a strict policy, the Commission then attempts to amend the applicable Ordinance. She suggested that in addition to a review of land use, the Commission re-assess its definition of a variance. Nielsen stated that the City is governed by State Statutes for variances. He pointed out that while the City makes minimum and reasonable rules, granting of variances to those rules will over time present problems in equitable administration of the rules. Further, he pointed out that review and updating of the Ordinances from time to time is an appropriate course of action. 9 '. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 10 Rosenberger indicated that in order for the Commission to be effective, he supported consistent application of the guidelines. Hansen described significant concerns regarding the adequacy and size of the site plan, potential stacking up of vehicles and the subsequent safety and traffic problems. He supported making Commission decisions, not neighborhood decisions. Bonach stated that the current situation at the location is unacceptable in terms of traffic and appearance. She expressed support for the Applicant's suggested improvements. Bean expressed support for the proposed redesign of the site with elimination of the gas pumps. He stated that approving the C.U.P. with the gas pumps is not good planning and it is the obligation of the Commission to ensure that decisions are made in a consistent manner to protect the City from liabilities. Bean commended the Applicant for attempting to improve and correct deficiencies of the property, but concluded that approval of the variance is not justified as a solution to the problems. Mr. Pyle stated that he did not anticipate any problem with stacking up of traffic on the property. Nielsen stated that the lack of space on the site was brought about by a previous owner who enlarged the building and therefore supports denial of the variance since it does not demonstrate a hardship. Rosenberger stated that he could not support approval of the variance as it is not justified under the criteria and that granting the C.U.P. and variance would exacerbate the traffic problem on the property and in the area. Motion failed 3/3. Hansen, Bean and Rosenberger voted nay. 6. 8:00 PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - REGULATIONS FOR DETACHED GARAGES Nielsen stated that the current Ordinance regulating accessory structures limits the number of garages to one per detached single-family dwelling. Since it is not uncommon for a house to have an attached garage and a detached garage, staff believes this provision may have been written in error. The proposed text amendment modifies the Code to limit detached garage structures to one per dwelling. A conditional use permit would be required to exceed one detached garage. Chair Rosenberger opened the Public Hearing at 9:30 p.m. Rob Sotirin, 5040 Shady Island Point, stated his support for the amendment to avoid requesting a C.U.P. 10 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 11 Chair Rosenberger closed the Public Hearing at 9:35 p.m. Bean moved, Hansen second to recommend to the Council that it approve an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1201 of the Shorewood City Code relating to Zoning Regulations, as proposed by the staff. Motion passed 6/0. 7. DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN APPROVAL - GIDEONS WOODS P.U.D. Aoolicant: Location: Katter Development Corp. 24590 Glen Road Nielsen stated that the Applicant has submitted development stage plans for the twinhome project located in the northwest quadrant of Glen Road and County Road 19. He reviewed a number of issues requiring additional information as detailed in his memorandum dated April 30, 1993 and recommended that consideration of the development stage plan be tabled to the Commission's May 18 meeting providing the requested information is received no later than May 11. Mr. Bruce Newton, Orono, briefly commented on the status of the Indian burial mound investigation. Hansen moved, Borkon seconded to table consideration of the development stage plan approval- Gideons Woods P.U.D. to May 18, 1993, or until the archeologist's report is completed. Motion passed 6/0. 8. SIMPLE SUBDIVISION Aoolicant: Location: Minnetonka Country ClublPaul Swanson 24575 Smithtown Road/24460 Yellowstone Trail Nielsen reviewed the Applicant's request tor approval ot a simple subdivisionlcombination to correct boundary line questions between the Country Club property and the Paul Swanson property located at 24460 Yellowstone Trail. The Club proposes to trade a 10' x 196' strip ot its property tor a 10' x 57' strip ot the Swanson property. The Swanson property currently contains 50,833 square teet ot area and the land swap would result in a 1390 square toot increase tor the Swanson property. Nielsen stated that the request is relatively simple except that Country Club Road abutting the properties is substandard with respect to right-ot-way width. The City's policy in such cases has been to acquire required right-of-way as allowed under the Statutes at the time land is subdivided. It is recommended that right-of-way be 11 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 4, 1993 - PAGE 12 dedicated as a condition of approval of the subdivision/combination. Nielsen referred to the letter dated May 4,1993 received from the Applicant's attorney, James Penberthy, stating that the City is going beyond the scope of the Ordinance that allows simple subdivisions. Nielsen stated that the City Attorney agrees that the City is within it's rights to acquire the right-of-way. In addition, Nielsen stated that the use of eminent domain to acquire property as suggested by Penberthy could prove costly to the City. Nielsen also noted that the size of the right- of-way acquisition is larger than the size of the property swap. The Commissioners discussed the legal implications of acquiring the right-of-way as a condition of approval of the request and agreed that given the City's concern of the status of Country Club Road and it's priority ranking for upgrading, it is appropriate for the City to take the right-of-way when the opportunity arises. Bean moved, Malam seconded to recommend to the Council that it approve the application for a simple subdivision of the Minnetonka Country Club/Paul Swanson at 24575 Smithtown Road/24460 Yellowstone Trail, subject to the staff recommendations detailed in the Planning Director's memorandum dated April 27, 1993. Motion passed 5/0. Borkon abstained. 9. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None. 10. REPORTS L~ Councilmember Lewis reviewed actions taken by the Council at its April 26 meeting and matters discussed at its Work Session. Lewis and Nielsen answered the Commissioner's questions regarding pending matters before the Council. Hansen briefly reviewed the recent activities of the Park Commission. 11 . ADJOURNMENT Hansen moved, Bean seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Motion passed 6/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Arlene H. Bergfalk Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 12 .. .. ~o..J) {J~ RECOMMENDATIONS Presented to THE SHOREWOOD BOARD OF REVIEW For the January 2, 1993 Assessment Meeting Date: May 24, 1993 by The Shorewood Assessor's Office TABLE OF CONTENTS PHILIP HOGLE 6025 MILL ST 35-117-23-34-0017 1 PATRICK KENNEY 4941 RUSTIC WAY 26-117-23-14-0011 2 RONALD FORNERIS 5730 BRENTRIDGE DR 31-117-23-14-0020 3 DAVID FREDRICKSON 26370 PEACH CIR 32-117-23-42-0021 4 ELDEN BECKMAN 6125 APPLE RD 35-117-23-34-0019 5 MI CHAEL KRAMER 5425 TIMBER LN 34-11723-22-0016 6 CLAIRE & ROBERT PETERSON 5480 CARRIE LN 36-117-23-21-0017 7 LARRY BUESGENS 20090 EXCELSIOR BLVD 25-117-23-31-0006 8 RICHARD WOOLDRIDGE 5525 WEDGEWOOD DR 33-117-23-22-0029 9 A & DORIS FILLMORE 4905 SUBURBAN DR 25-117-23-23-0016 10 RICHARD OHRBECK 28225 BOULDER CIR 31-117-23-34-0019 11 KARL SCHUELE 4320 ENCHANTED DR 30-117-23-23-0001 12 PATRICK COLLINS 4675 FATIMA PL 26-117-23-11-0011 13 KRISTIE LEBLANC 4680 FATIMA PL 26-117-23-11-0016 14 WAYNE OELFKE 6170 STRAWBERRY LN 32-117-23-34-0046 15 STEPHEN POLSTON 28215 BOULDER BRIDGE 31-117-23-34-0020 16 MARK HUGO 5395 SHADY HILLS CIR 25-117-23-44-0042 17 WILLIAM WILSON 23060 STRATFORD PL 35-117-23-33-0019 18 DONALD MARK 28190 WOODSIDE RD 31-117-23-31-0024 19 THOMAS SKRAMSTAD 28020 WOODSIDE RD 31-117-23-24-0001 20 STUART & GAIL FINNEY 19710 CHARTWELL HILL 36-117-23-13-0026 21 DICK LARSON 5610 VINE HILL RD 36-117-23-14-0064 22 ELIAZBETH LINDOW 27920 SMITHTOWN ROAD 31 117 23 34 0003 23 I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ph ~ I i P ADDRESS , D 2. $ Al..U prDD 3 S -" 7 - 2 3 .. 3" .. R U.~l&" s+. tJO 17 PROPERTY TYPE SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 S , STORIES I GROUND FLOOR ARI':A-12.l/G. PORCH OR DECK J,tA,t!. GARAGE ~ 7f,. II J.... BSM'T FlNIStIlNG~ 1# BEDROOMS Z. , BATHS I.. F II , I r -i:- F IIH:I'I.ACI.:S I f:Io:NTn ^ I. ^"~ N I> LOT SIZE &/ , z. 00 ... WALKOUT '16 ~ COMMENTS H 0 ~ I ~ C p; ~ ~ \A. .. () '" . lIP ~ ~', ",,, M t-. ~ " ., "" + eo '" ..."..... Re.f...... -\-- p , +.iO s.. ( tie J' I. .. k. .' VALUATION 93 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION '10 ~eo "1'000 ~ DATE S -,~3 LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR 2 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME fatV'I'(.J<!.. k€lI/~1v1 I ADDRESS '-I9~/ RiJ5f/c.. ~Uc?. y PTDf1 ~ b -1/7- ;). ~ - /'1- 60/ I PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE q.5 500 YEAR BUILT /930 GROUND FLOOR AR1':A Cf/?.. GARAGE ). (ell-- ddacheJ 11 BEDROOMS 3 '.'lRI':I'l.M:l':S C) LOT SIZE~ ~ i3 b 5(" ft COMMENTS SALE DATE c; - ~ 0 - 9/ STORIES / ~ PORCH OR DECK 0 BSWT FINISHING 0 I 11 BATHS I-Ft(11 1- ~ CEN'l'n^1. ^ II~ NO WALKOUT NO CjJ.. /r3 - ik'WIestead crbO-ft,/ly/Pk;!- beivlC1 PHJC"C'SSed v ( 93/9'1 - &W1E?sT-ecc1 . VALUATION 1~ q3 353()D 39000 SD9/JO 53DOO 2'bt~ yJ:;t:; LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMEND 37000 53000 q,J..OOD DATE G-lt-93 3 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ~/9-G:O F(}~...vEiJ2J,-S ADDRESS S 7:3LJ 132?.Pm7ZIt?6G V? PTDI1 !3/- .//7- ,,;;;>3 - /~ - i!)";J~ PROPERTY TYPE ;f SALE PRICE / 7~ 6 g t)O . YEAR BUILT 19"9'1 C:ROUND FLOOR AREA //7~ ~~ l GARAGE 3 t!A-li? ./47TrtcA'ftC? H BEDROOMS ~ F IImI'I.M:l'~~ t!2 A) ~ LOT SIZE ~ 7 ~ 96- COMMENTS SALE DATE 9-d/ - 9;L STORIES d S~~y PORCH OR flECK ~ - z;e-C-.~ BSM'T FINIS11lNG "vG:)A'C II BATtIS O? ~U. /--?'~ , CEN'I'I~^1. ^ I U Y f .s WALKOUT A.l "AI ~ VALUATION RECOMMFm> COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR <Y/6t:/O 1//spp ~/:S-i)~ LS-9'Yt?P /~,ge:J /3?~t') L?~ i?t70 /'JfjJ~po J ?B 9pz} ~~ DATE 6"- /S'-?3 4 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME .2?#,V/O r,eED21t:.kS(;')/v ADDRESS &:J63?CJ ;;t5'ACH CiA!~c:...E PTDIf ~ -//7- d~ - .y~ -C;t::);;ll - PROPERTY TYPE ;e SALE PRICE )LJ~~ YEAR BUILT J 99/ , C:IWUND FLOOR ARI':^ //o~h 15'3 GARAGE 3 d#/l... "I} 7J;pC.#~LJ /I BEDROOMS ,~ I,'IHI':I'I.M:I':S d:L LOT SIZE 3" Ol C> sf i;f SALE D^TE AJ); I STORIES d S;r6;1!y' PORCII OW DECK 'Z:)&CJt BSM'! FlNISltlNG .A.)d N t: , BATHS ~ - r~t:.-> /-~;l-- .,. y~-s AJ 4,,;c1 (;.., C:ENTI~^1. ^ I ~ WALKOUT COMMENTS LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR I '~;L /".~ 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~~(')OO .i./8/;oo 41"'''c; /77sa() / 790cD 1~/d()O ~ 12SPO ;;Q7"~O/t:J?';;UJ ,~ ~ DATE ~-)g'-?3 VALUATION 5 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME EL..L?~p }?FL~ g;;#"eI ADDRESS k,/~S ~~~aE" 'Zt::J . PTDII 3.s-- //7 - ~~~ - 3~ - ()(7/?' PROPERTY TYPE ;p RECOMMEND ~~d"() # 9~ ~"IJ()a -9 tJ ~ () ~ ~ ~ tX:JC) B ~ Bt:JO '9~ ~ e8 BOD ~.~..c/ DATE o-,18-~3 SALE PRICE ~~ YEAR BUILT /'1'dO GROUND FLOOR ARI':A ~~ II b Cl GARAGE >>t)~L II BEDROOMS e? A.J ~ "'IUIWI.M:I'::-; AJtJAJ(" . LOT SIZE ) , ~JJ ..4ce~..s COMMENTS ST~r/L,e~ Al:;r;.s S~~ . VALUATION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR SALE DATE ~ STORIES / ~tI/ .s;n:1/Zyl PORCII OR I>ECI< ~CG,tf!).seL? (9iLC# BSM'T FlNIStllNG ,:SI!J % II BA TItS / - ::7j/~ . C EN'I'I~ ^ I. ^' U ;U a IV t:.. WALKOUT >>0;0 t: / .s ~~?r.-e;7 #/C/,c;J :VE"c ER.i2l.O //:l~~7~/~E~G~ COUNCIL ACTION SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ;t1 it'.. l1Qel /{ Ira mer ADDRESS 5 if;) L:) 11 /111 be. fr "'4 J1 e PTDI1 3'-/ -1/7 - '). 3 - ;).:J. - Dol h PROPERTY TYPE R L SALE PRICE SALE DATE STORIES / YEAR BUILT J 95), GROUND FLOOR ARI':A /7/0 GARAGE ;).. Ca V- q !fQcl,eJ. , BEDROOMS :) I"IUJo:I'I,M:Kc.; ;;t LOT SIZE /00 TFF COMMENTS (.., iclelJl/) 5 Bay See: 'pagf/ 1/ 1) . of ~Jes ~oDK q/SD - 55;}".5 ll'YI1ber- Lo... sold {'or- ;}.50000 4bD~t the SCfJtH-e hDuse- 0"'- a 5h--ull/ev- /lJt PORCH OR DECK BSM'T FINISHING 30% II BAnIS /- Felli ;-1r C:1':NTI~^1. ^ I U YeS WALKOUT Yes VALUATION COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING 'lUI'AL ASSESSOR q;)... 9 3 /5 3~olJ /9tJooa. 7;), lfOO 7~ooo ). J.5'joO l!.~3P9D 1?~ ~V/ RECOMMFlID /7000D ~5000 ~35000 DATE ~-/g-93 b i- I- C).. ;) /?D I ., SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME el..,,,"c, + ~.,...+ P.~.~SOM ADDRESS $ ., r D t.. ~ '" .' .. L .. . PTD" 3 t.. - U 7" 1...1 .. 2. t · f) () , 1 PROPERTY TYPE R l.. SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 7~'. &. 0 STORIES 2 S.J.tJ ~ Y-- C:ROUND FLOOR AR":A~ PORC" OR DECK 0 a.k GARAGE 3 e. ill' Tv & k ""d.... BSM' T FlNISIIlNG Y.. '" " BEDROOMS i , BATHS 3. F,," 2 · t '.'IImI'I.ACI':S 2. CJo:NTI~^1. ^ II~ Yes LOT SIZE-A,pNH 10 S 000 ,. WALKOUT Y. S COMMENTS Lot "'... $ ~.... ~ -\. ,.. ~ e. C ~ C ~ \It ~ ~ + w.. ..t I.. '- ~ t.~ i-ekr;V41 "'e~. t.Jc,-I-,'tI""\ f:F~+e ....10"') VALUATION 92. ." RECOMMFm> COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR ~ So 000 3. 7Sooo 2(.0 00 C> 2."" 000 2""000 2.3Al 000 ". If 0 00 S\' 0,,0 &f.'" oct 0 1\ F)..~'~ ~ DATE .s -IV - ,.) .~::~!5;~::.'j::'~~, ..,: .".~~~\ ~-, : :.,/"1"< " ._~~\;~~- B SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME L 0..". ~ 'I 8ue S ~ e.~..r ADDRESS 2 O. , 0 l')t &. ..I s: 0 ~ a l~ ~ · PTDII :l S -117.. 1. ,. II .. 000 C. PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - VALUATION YEAR BUILT " '- , GROUND FLOOR AREA,J/3(' PORCII OR nECK Sa"'....,. P.tac.~ GARAGE ~ e.A.,," A-++&.c.~.~ BSM'T FlNISIIlNG Ye, S. ~ II BEDROOMS 2. 11 BATHS J .. F., f I , .. t fo'lImI'I.M:I':S' CENTI~ ^'. ^ II~ J 0 LOT SIZE !. ., .. ... WALKOUT Ye s- COMMENTS A~'.....,-- -t d Co" ..l a fO "" ..-.. -+'. 11\. + .s -b...-ic.~ .. J ..f .. II... II _ ......-f. J ...+ <&. ~o. LI 0+ ~"....t.o-'~"'~ ,"" cll I.. k.... fl... ~ f -" .r.. L...1 b.. Ie. . 92. '3 '101100 &f'l foo 1/'1 S/lO " "0 '7$'0 '7 $00 '0' roo 111000 "1.'00 (/). .; c:;:::z~ 1d{)~ DATE STORIES I RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR s- ,. .., '3 ~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ZC#;tI~LJ "'" ;a,E /eJtXJ<::.. KIO<$c. ADDRESS S-S-e:J6- U/6'd6E hac:) 0 PTD' 30- //7 - d 3 - ~ - (;()d)9' PROPERTY TYPE :l' SALE PRICE J..j#l SALE DATE >>;H- YEAR BUILT /9S"~ STORIES d ST~I GROUND FLOOR ARI':A / ~S~ /d 7~ B PORCH OR DECK 0& c::= R GARAGE ;;; d#.Il. /J/7~/i1;) aSM'T FlNISIIING 7 a % 11 BEDROOMS '7' , BATHS or,Fu t:~..J ./ - !/~ / - ~~, "'"H:I'I.M:ES ~ CI':NTnAI. ^"~ ;I E-S LOT SIZE 3c::l 7~o WALKOUT YES , , COMMENTS 7Z c~/L OF S ,,71: ~S ;ZuAl .. tiFF 4L./2t?JSS /T LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR /"~.;J-. 19~ -3 RECOMMFlID COUNCIL ACTION ~? :9~t) ~~~()(J ~() t!)oa /d/7bOlJ /a-sl~ /~.?~t) ~. '70()(). /~L,,?,?cjlJ _ ~_~ DATE s-I?-~ VALUATION \0 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME A ~w" r:-; U Me....... ADDRESS "I'" S Sub", h 10 a-..... (J t- . PTDH 2. S -1/7 - 2.. 'l ... 2. ') - 0 0 I (. PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT " 1L STORIES I GROUND FLOOR AREA 9/9 PORCII OR DECK ~ I &2..cI P..... c.~ GARAGE 2. ect. 0.. -t-.. 4t.. c. d B5M'! FlNISItING No II BEDROOMS Z , BATHS I - 1='" II 1.'IWIo:I'I,M:I.:S 1 CI':N'I'R^1. ^IU llti LOT SIZE 91 000 ~ WALKOUT JJ~ COMMENTS 0\ J o\.,..l.{a kell/e.. "....-t \ 1 ""'.. ~..~ ,.2." A c. 'c+ . VALUATION , L " 3 RECOMM:OO> COUNCIL ACTION ,ro -'00 ~$So. SSooo 3<<- Coo 37 Coo 330.0 ,., 1.00 -'3000 t r 000 !f)..~~ MJ~ DATE ~ - ," - 4) LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR I \ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME 1(,'c. k . \It ~ D~~ ~ Cc.k. ADDRESS 2'.2 Z. S i.\& \ ~..,.. e.~ 1~.. t. :~. prDH 3& .. U1.. 2. 3 -.31- ,~,~ PROPERTY TYPE ~ t... SALE PRICE - SALE DhTE - VALUATION li FtlmI'I.M:Jo:S 2. CEN"'U^1. ^ I R AI () LOT SIZE ~ C. 7 01) 1:11 I ~'FZLKOU'l' V. s 9...~ '. COMMENTS 1 J D F: F: S... , ... L'to",^, a ~ + "'.... 2. ~...v. Dc.i. C;A.l/io"~ c. ~tl. ~u~~ ~.\J'W"'.e.~ - l_ ~A..O s~","r ~ 1Y}4.A,.. ~cus~ hA~ $oM.- ~N~h~AI~ I ~1!m~ , 2. , 3 RF.coMMEND COUNCIL ACTION tl.7'1 2.DC !~6000 2.1 OcOOO J 0' 2. 00 I I) 'I 7'D I 3 ~ 400 ~ 'Il'1'fJfJ +04fOO ~~ DATE 6-1'I-'J H BhTHS I- F' '" \l S'" 3 0 De~k Yes I .. 1,- J .t- YEhR BUILT 19.r '" STORIES C:ROUND FLOOR ^Rt':^~ GARAGE 2 C A'" T".ku~J..... PORCH OR m:CK BSM'T FINISHING H BEDROOMS LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR 1"2.. SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME J<4.'f" J Set, LI~ / e ADDRESS Lr~:J-() PJ1CI1dJ/l-l-e~ Dr PTDII ?, 0 - i / 7 - J'3 - :23 ~ 0 0 0 / PROPERTY TYPE R L SALE PRICE 3 J. 9 f;-O 0 YEAR BUILT i 9 ~ '6 <:ROUND FLOOR AREA /7 ;J.1o GARAGE ~ Ca r- atlaf...,heJ II BEDROOMS 5' 1.'1 R I-:I'I.ACI':S ;;L LOT SIZE ().. () () F F COMMENTS P he I D~ B t1v I 1" 5ee p~je-- 11l VALUATION CfJ- 93 JlJoOtJo /'f:A LfOJJ Ih3fr;OO /10'10/)0 ~h3~OO 3D~t'OI) l r.ud fJ/Jt#,Akt1 LAND BUILDING 'lUfAL ASSESSOR SALE DATE o -;). S .-9 ;).. / STORIES PORCH OR DECK En C)t1SPJ fhvcn -+ Dee/( BSM'! FlNISIlING ~O~O f1 BATHS ~ -Pet /1 /- \. C\.:NTnAI. A I R Yes WALKOUT Yes 1\1\ ~J~s pOD/( COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMFlID 1'1;). '-/00 lid if 000 30 fa '-/00 DATE S-(j(-C/3 ,] SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME 1??r'P/C.I<-+- K/lTJlPY).l C;:;~/~.s ADDRESS 'SI~ 7S FHT/P?/I 7iACc PTDfI e5i~ -I) 7-;;; 3 - / J- (J()/ / PROPERTY TYPE K SALE PRICE ~jQ YEAR BUILT /9s-9 GROUND FLOOR AREA g;;s / ?9~ I GARAGE e:< C7 ~/t. 19 d ACHEO H BEDROOMS ~ l.'lImI'I.M:Jo:S ,;;2, LOT SIZE d;S3?S .pi COMMENTS / /V rE"A!/4;:2 SALE DATE >>it I STORIES .;;l STt:J/?V PORCH OR HECK 'PO () ~ BSM'T FlNISIIlNG 30 i>/l} II BATItS / F2e~L. , / - ~~ . CI':NTnAI. A I U AiI).A.J E.., WALKOUT ., .>>6.lJL.- .s:,7>>.GtIfe)~ LJA7&CJ ,IS LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR /9"~ /9?:3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 3/ ?G)~ ~ooo 3 S OO() 79'3t)~ 78/l)tJ ?5t:)OO /~opo ~/3/9<'., ~/t) fX)t) ~_~ DATE .s--/7-1f?3 . VALUATION 14t SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME dE ~F~/+Yi?JJ7//II(, L.6gt,~>>G ADDRESS ~6t/) ,cAT 1J?J1'1 ?G PTD" d~-117- ~3 -/I-G)()/h PROPERTY TYPE .;f SALE PRICE 9 ~ OIJ l) YEAR BUILT / ~~tJ <:ROUND FLOOR AR1':A 1.;137 GARAGE ..;? t!A~ A 71.401ELJ H BEDROOMS ~ I" lIml'1.M:l':S ~ >> t:. LOT SIZE d~t;/?3 I COMMENTS ST7Z~C'7k.4-€.. A/H-5 ~ &t.-E/b~ SALE DATE q -d:lc71 - ~~ STORIES .J? ,4-/?;B~E~ PORCII OR 1lI':CK Pel AJ ~ BSM'T FlNISltlNG d~ ~ /iJ I BATtIS J - r-~ , / - 0/,1 , YES YeS ~R~CPCJ"e/#~ CENTnAI. A 11~ WALKOUT VALUATION I~t?~ 1913 RECOMMF1ID COUNCIL ACTION LAND ~? ~PO 5d)Sot) 5'e;':J.5' ~ GJ BUILDING S9'9()() ~oo 5""c:5l9 t!)t!) 'lUl'AL N.;l~~ /1~~b5.yC;() ASSESSOR -.5-/1 ~3 ~:/IIiltXt~ DATE '5 ~ ~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Wall lt1 e- 0 e} F /( -e 7 . ADDRESS (0/7D S-frrJuJb~vr J-a. PTD, 3 ,) - II 7 - J ~ ~ 3 '1- 00 tj"b PROPERTY TYPE z.. .. SALE PRICE YEAR BUILT J 979' <:ROUND FLOOR AREA /0 ILl GARAGE ;). CaV qtlqc-~eJ H BEDROOMS :3 "'1UJo:I'l.M:l':S 0 LOT SIZE ;). J g'lDsq. --fir . SALE DATE STORIES spill em-"'y PORCH OR IlECK DecK: BSM'T FINISHlNG 71) 0/0 11 BAnIS j-FLf/1 /- ~. CI':NTI~^1. ^ I J{ jVo WALKOUT /'JD COMMENTS VALUATION S-ce ~qge r'l - O/dev hDuse OV\ I aYrjt"./r Joi ~8<L 9'S-vvtLLcll 6/de;.-- hoctse u./rfk s/t-n)C/I- siZe jot' pare Cf7- s)i3h1ly larrr 'MUSe.. o'vt s;WlJa/l siZe lor 1J-.. '13 RECOMMOO COUNCIL ACTION 3/500 .3750Q 37500 0J.5DO b35DD '='3500 q'7q~() /.0/000. If) I cYoo p~ I~t/Jypt~ DATE!:>--::/t-q'i LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR I&. SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME S +dLp-~ .'" Yo (r+o ~ ADDRESS 2'2.'$ a 0 U \ ~ "\r' ~ ~ ro...l Co PTDII i I · I' , .. 2., - I 'I - 00'- 0 PROPERTY TYPE RL. SALE PRICE SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 72. STORIES Z .!!..da- L (;ROUND FLOOR AREA "'1 t.. PORClI OR DECK S........ ,.....l. -+- O&c..~ GARAGE 2. Co... A++-'&.L...J BSM'T FlNISIIlNG Y. r II BEDROOMS I{ , BATItS-' -1='" tl , - i- /.. /; 10'1 REI'I.ACI.:S I CENTI~^1. ^ I H 'I e. $ LOT SIZE (. f DOO . IU~'WALKOU'l' No COMMENTS L~kft ~J.6'" ~ IMJd wA-S IN cor,-'/! ~ ~IQ.'~ - hDU~~ I~ JA.~c! I ~ ~~c.+' Of\.)A- \ LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR ~ 2. 9 '3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~"DOO 31.'000 J()ODOO 11f.s 0 ~ 0 142 DO 0 '42. DO D 1./3 t/ 000 ~,3fJ(JO ++2000 ---5)~J,':.O cr: ul~ _ DATE S - 'If - 'j VALUATION 't SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME IlJ/h?K YUba ADDRESS 5395" S#/1/:/Y #/~ C!/I12C.~E PTD' d 5" - //7 - .;l.~ - t7/~ - t:)~ <;/.d2- PROPERTY TYPE 'Z SALE PRICE >> ~ SALE DATE ~~ YEAR BUILT /9 ~~ STORIES ;PJ4nJ~.c/Z. GROUND FLOOR AREA /S5'~ PORCII OR DECK Sd/Z~ ;;::;,~# GARAGE d t!A'~ ;#.l7*IIG~ 8SM'T FlNIStllNG .5""" 4h II BEDROOMS 3 , BATHS .I - ~U;J 1- ~'? 1- ~:;l-- . 1,'IIH:I'I.ACJ.:S e:2 CENTI~^1. ^ II~ )'E.s LOT SIZE d (, :3t:/~ ? WALKOUT ..A.Jt!J"vL COMMENTS J /tI:r E /Z//J ~ / S p# n L7 ,.4t/ll,cJ~.s S~/J?E 7)E~E212~L) ~#//VT#//V~E:.. VALUATION RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR 3t;, ?~O cVt'S"G7~ ~t?s~a y ~ ~"() ~9St)d 7~gt?O )/9~~_~~/17~ r~~ D~ ~~r-~~ 18 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME \AI////tlm. VI d5() r.. ADDRESS J 30bo ~t-r;ry'J. pL.. PTD' 35'- 1/7-;)\-33- Dol'! PROPERTY TYPE K . SALE PRICE SALE DATE YEAR BUILT If( g7 STORIES;Y GROUND FLOOR AR":A f ;l.b~ PORCH OR (lECK 1=M)OSe). D{)Jrch I GARAGE 3 Cav- Q-ffrlc.heJ,. BSM'T FlNlSlllNG 0 /I BEDROOMS 4 # BATHS d-FtI /1 I-l '.'1 RIWI.AC1':S I CENTI~^1. ^' R Y-e5 LOT SIZE ~ 06()() SCj"-?+' WALKOUT ND COMMENTS See.. pa9~ {.; r 0 f Stl/e5 boD/(. - S}'1kf/f/' JC/~lleY hlJv~ W i'1lr1 d-calr gqva'!e- + tJDro bt1~(>W7eyrf i2iYJ t't;h Oil\ lalfe...,... lor C/I$D Fo.9~ 7Y 01 Sq/es hoD/(. - la~eY' h/Jqso wd-k- "0% bq.5ei'l'l€rvf-f,v,/SA. D/I\. ~jm;/qr ;;)?e, JoT '1 ~ Cf 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~J. <gOD 7J;5DtJ 75500 I <3~goo lCl 15tJO 19 /5'00 )./''t,::J I!t~ ;).:/;00 5-/>t-'1-~ VALUATION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR ,CI V \ / i vJ .!) &.. ~ ~ 0(0- ",e \)\~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME --Dt) 11\ .. LJ 11 4 ~ Ie ADDRESS 28" 0 Wo.J t i J e... (J.,J. PTDI1 31..1\1- 1. , -11- 002.'1 PROPERTY TYPE R L- SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT 19 ., r STORIES I rORCH OH J)ECK~"~ BSM'T FINISIIlNG---Y. S 11 BATHS ~ -F\J \ \ CEN'I'I~AI. AIU Ye t WALKOUT 5 WI /1, ~tt~~ \ :I ..,- GROUND FLOOR ARI':A 110 I' GARAGE 1. CQ"" Tv..'--".. uta S 2. LOT SIZE 37' 00 ,. COMMENTS Re:~veS+ 11 BEDROOMS 10'1 HJo:I'I.ACI':S VALUATION RECOMME'1ID COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR ~~ WdL DATE ~-/~- .,~ 20 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME T" 0 '" " .r S k~.."" S +. d ADDRESS :2 8 C) 2..0 W 00 ~ s: cf ~ RJ prD# 3 I -Il 7 - z. ,... 2. tf .. & 00 '- . PROPERTY TYPE R L SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT 19 SS STORIES I C:ROUND FLOOR ARI':A ,. ~ t' z.. PORCII OR DECK O. ..k GARAGE 2 CQ.~ ~.,J BSM'T FINISIIING Yc c II BEDROOMS I.( II BATHS I .. F" ~ f ( FlU \WI.M:ES 2 c EN'\'J~ ^ I. ^ \ U 'I. S LOT SIZE 3' 2. 00 . WALKOUT Y ~ r COMMENTS' SO ~.F: a~\+~~...... G...V ~J4~1t:4-c..l&",) #e.W OC6..~ R .:f. ~ P. 11"l S 41 e.r b ...Ie. (!!. lCf COO,,") 9 2.. 93 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 2'" 'DO 29/100 ~ '1100 I~$"OO "3000 "'000 Ua.O....ll.O.. ~.. O..A~ YS'/ l~tJ ~DATE S-'Y-'3 VALUATION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR 2\ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME S t u Go ~ t F" ; '" M .. Y , ADDRESS ., 7 ,() ~"'4.~" "'ell H: II PTDII.-3 (. .. u.:J - z. J -- J:I - 00 a., PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 8 r STORIES R. 6-'" s ~ oc.DG-".1\ z. C- 1''' , GROUND FLOOR ARI':A J& 3 , rORCII OR DECK "AI-cd p....,J.. + o. c, "- GARAGE 2 f:/t...". A ;.+. c.~ .J BSM'T FINISIIING Y. $ 1# BEDROOMS 4 II BATHS 2 - F,,' I .1 .-J:- FIRIo:I'J.M:t.:S 1 CENTnAI. AIR y~S' LOT SIZE 2 3 , 0 0 " WALKOUT N D COMMENTS S tl.Q rOI La w , N (j- ~~N'\ fk:V'~~ G-Iltt-d I ~ '7 I ~ j A-s { N Cd ........f'e'cJ oN A-m m c"n I .J, ~ ,..l VALUATION 92. 93 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 12.. 00 D 'Z 2. <... 4-u 0 27~4o () DATE ~ -1'/ - ,~ LAND BUILDING 'lUl'AL ASSESSOR 73. Dec 7l Doo ~~J Ooe ~J'ooo 291" 000 310... fdJlL GJt /.u t..- RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS 5570 Old Market Rd. PID# 36-117-23-12-0054 SALE PRICE $325.000. YEAR BUILT 1987 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2808 GROUND FLOOR AREA 1532 SALE DATE 2-6-93 STORIES Two Story PORCI ( OR DECK Enc. Porch, Deck GARAGE 3 Car A tt . BSM'T FINISHING None # BEDROOMS 3 # BATHS 2-Full. 1-1/2 F I REPI .ACES 1 CENTRAl. AIR Yes LOT SIZE 22533 SF COMMENTS WALKOUT Yes RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS 19555 Waterford Pl. PIDD 36 117 23 11 0013 SALE PRICE $385tOOO.00 SALE DATE 10-14-92 YEAR BUILT 1985 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2966 GROUND FLOOR AREA 1676 STORIES Two Story PORCH OR OI':CK Screen Porch GARAGE 3 Car Au. BSM'T FINISHING 50% D BEDROOMS 5 # BATHS 2-Fullt 2-3/4t 1-1/2 FIR EPI.^CES 2 CENTRAl. AIR Yes LOT SIZE 32000 SF WALKOUT No COMMENTS 22.. SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ~ ld1dvA ~4VSD fA. ADDRESS 50/0 V,ne tAil RJ:. PTDIf "3 b -I J 7 - d.- 3 - J '-/- 0 (j 6 r PROPERTY TYPE K SALE DATE Lf.-gg STORIES I rORCII OR DECK 0 BSM'T FINISHING D II BATHS 1- Fl.{// C:EN'I'I~^1. ^"~ '1-6 WALKOUT y~ (j4cd/fr 01 hDlIs-e.- was {t-l eLrVt)r - J1ew l/O/Ue. v-e '{!feG1's -lite Ct14n~e Wl~~ , VALUATION qJ- cr3 'to /OD tt 0000 ~t6'-1DO /~,)9oo I d-.i 5 DO . . J 'I'J..:.100 Fbd.. J(,/~~,/;W!!1- RECOMMERD tf;).OOO CjS300 1~72>OO DATE b"-/g-93 COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING 'lUl'AL ASSESSOR 2.3 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME EL/2~~Er# ~/.it/Pdu,) ADDRESS d 79da ~/:i17/T.#?71#fb.# ;p ~ PTDI1 31- //7 -;,3 -3~ - CU:J03 PROPERTY TYPE /2 c:::. SALE PRICE >> ;W SALE DATE AI';it YEAR BUILT / 9 S-~ STORIES SPC/7 E;"v;:r,ey GlmUND FLOOR ARI':A .//C'J9 rORCII OR m:CK EAL~dSFL:J ~CN/])6"'t:/< GARAGE~ ~Aa ~.EL) BSM'T FlNISlt1NG ~~~,0 /I BEDROOMS.3 /I BATHS / -~~.., /- V-? 10'1 RI':I'I.M:I.:S c:2- CENTI~^1. ^ J1~ Y E.5 LOT SIZE <;'0 r~ WALKOUT Yes COMMENTS SE G' PlP6E .I/d .//f./ ~.1!.5 iB~~ L!'f{l,6&;e, +Oi.-oe-/2. ~.s~ UJ/TH /tJ() F,c .sEe m6E l)t.( /lJEU/EIZ-~.tt!-41E06'/Z /-bJusE n; //./1 3;;;. r=-~ VALUATION ;99;1- .19'3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND /~.5.1tf)CJ /8/000 ltg/C),,/) BUILDING ~:Jtt::)O ~9"~o ~~" a6 TOTAL ,::;l//Si!JCJ e5l~~o~S~ 000 ASSESSOR ~~ATE S--/9-~3 ~ .. ... RECOMMENDATIONS Presented to THE SHOREWOOD BOARD OF REVIEW For the January 2, 1993 Assessment Meeting Date: May 24, 1993 by The Shorewood Assessor's Office '- TABLE OF CONTENTS PHILIP HOGLE 6025 MILL ST 35-117-23-34-0017 1 PATRICK KENNEY 4941 RUSTIC WAY 26-117-23-14-0011 2 RONALD FORNERIS 5730 BRENTRIDGE DR 31-117-23-14-0020 3 DAVID FREDRICKSON 26370 PEACH CIR 32-117-23-42-0021 4 ELDEN BECKMAN 6125 APPLE RD 35-117-23-34-0019 5 MI CHAEL KRAMER 5425 TIMBER LN 34-11723-22-0016 6 CLAIRE & ROBERT PETERSON 5480 CARR IE LN 36-117-23-21-0017 7 LARRY BUESGENS 20090 EXCELSIOR BLVD 25-117-23-31-0006 8 RICHARD WOOLDRIDGE 5525 WEDGEWOOD DR 33-117-23-22-0029 9 A & DORIS FILLMORE 4905 SUBURBAN DR 25-117-23-23-0016 10 RICHARD OHRBECK 28225 BOULDER CIR 31-117-23-34-0019 11 KARL SCHUELE 4320 ENCHANTED DR 30-117-23-23-0001 12 PATRICK COLLINS 4675 FATIMA PL 26-117-23-11-0011 13 KRISTIE LEBLANC 4680 FATIMA PL 26-117-23-11-0016 14 WAYNE OELFKE 6170 STRAWBERRY LN 32-117-23-34-0046 15 STEPHEN POLSTON 28215 BOULDER BRIDGE 31-117-23-34-0020 16 MARK HUGO 5395 SHADY HILLS CIR 25-117-23-44-0042 17 WILLIAM WILSON 23060 STRATFORD PL 35-117-23-33-0019 18 DONALD MARK 28190 WOODSIDE RD 31-117-23-31-0024 19 THOMAS SKRAMSTAD 28020 WOODSIDE RD 31-117-23-24-0001 20 STUART & GAIL FINNEY 19710 CHARTWELL HILL 36-117-23-13-0026 21 DICK LARSON 5610 VINE HILL RD 36-117-23-14-0064 22 ELIAZBETH LINDOW 27920 SMITHTOWN ROAD 31 117 23 34 0003 23 I SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Ph ~ I. P ADDRESS , D 2. S A.uJ PTDfI ~ S -II 7 - 2 3 .. 3 tf .. R Uo~l.... s.f.. tJo 17 PROPERTY TYPE SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 S , STORIES I GROUND FLOOR ^RI':A~ PORC" OR DECK NIJWe. GARAGE ~ 77,. " J.~ BSM'T FlNIStlING~ /I BEDROOMS Z. , BATHS I... F'" I , -i:- 10'1 RJo:I'I.ACI.:S I CEN'l'I~^1. ^ 11~ No LOT SIZE .., , z. 00 ... WALKOUT ,,~ ~ COMMENTS H tJ tJ I ~ C p, ~ ~ \A. .. () K . .. ~ ;. "'''.,~ ~ " ~ ...+ e.~ ............ Ref."" *. P t liO s.. ( ~ J' ~.. ~ l VALUATION 92- 93 RECOMMFlID COUNCIL ACTION LAND 37200 &10 000 110 000 BUILDING Lf'Soo So $00 'f I 000 TOTAL 8 (. 700 '0 SOo ~ ASSESSOR -DOfl.:J~ tp.:L!- DATE S -,.~ 3 2 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME fat V"I t/<... k € vli#1lA I ADDRESS '191// f<iJsf/c... ~V"^Y PTDI1 ~b-117-;)'3>-J'I-()OII PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE q.5 5 DO YEAR BUILT /930 GROUND FLOOR ARI':A '1/?- GARAGE ).. rd~ ddached 11 BEDROOMS 3 J.'I ~I':I'I.M:I':S 0 LOT SIZE~ ~ 'f 3 c::. 59' ff: COMMENTS SALE DATE tf-;),o-CJ/ /~ STORIES PORCH OR DECK o BSM'T FINISHING 0 I , BATHS /-Fqll /- ~ CENTRAl. A II~ NO WALKOUT ND '/).. /'13 - ffrJ'vV/esfead c/ba-ft,vnPk7!-- bei~la PYOC-c-:SSed v' ( q"3 /9 J.j - tklftl'€sf-ecd . VALUATION 1~ 93 353tJD 39000 SD900 53DOO gb~:) ;(::1:; LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMEND 37000 53000 qJ..OOD DATE G-I t-9..3 3 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ~/9-cO F"J2~EtJ2J,-S ADDRESS S 7 at!) 13.J:i'~/tI7~/~6E Z/:P. PTDI1 3/- .//7- ;13 - /~ - ~CJ~~ PROPERTY TYPE 7: SALE DATE 9 - d,1 - 9,;2.; STORIES d:) S~ :;e I PORCII OR DECK .;< - z;E'c.~ BSM'T FlNISltlNG A..; tt>/P (.. 11 BATtIS d1 ~ u. / - ~Q:)-> , n:N'I'I~^1. ^' u Y E oS WALKOUT .A.J "AI €:- VALUATION RECOHMFlID COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR 7//600 ff/SPP ~/S-tt:)CJ LS.y.y"p /~.g(} /3;7~// /~~~ /~. .t!;It)C) 1789p~ ~~ DATE s-- /S'-?.:3 4 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ]/A'P/O hE DEIC-KSt:J/v ADDRESS ~63?t:J 715"ACH Ci~~GE PTDI1 ~ -//7- d~. - .y'.;2 -c:;aPl / . PROPERTY TYPE ;e SALE PRICE )LJ~~ YEAR BUILT / r.?9/ , C:ROUND FLOOR AREA / /0/ /;J. I .s-.3 GARAGE 3 d#/l., ;I} 7J;pc#~LJ 11 BEDROOMS ,~ F1UI':I'I.ACJo:S ~ LOT SIZE 3 9~o ~ " SALE DATE AlA I STORIES d :57#~r rORCH OR DECK 7::)ecK BSM'T FlNISlllNG "A.) 4 ~ t: 11 BATHS c:I - rj,U,tt" ;... ~~ - y~..:S A.ltJ/fIc, CENTI~^1. ^ I U WALKOUT COMMENTS LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR / ,,, ;L /tf"" 3 RECOMMFm> COUNCIL ACTION ~~()OO ~g"O() 4ftJtJc; / 77 s~() / 79 oeD )~I d()O .i412~PO ,;J.;n"()o~t!J9a~ ,~.,l'~ .~ DATE 0' -) :?-'?.3 VALUATION 5 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME EL..L/,E,tI J?F..c~ Q?~"e/ ADDRESS ~/:;JS A~~L.E :et:::J . prDH c3S-- //7 -,;:; ~ - 3~ - t'Jt7/'f' K PROPERTY TYPE >>/H YEAR BUILT /'1'dO (;ROUND FLOOR AREA 9~ /1 (;. Cl GARAGE >>i?~L H BEDROOMS t? A.) ~ J.' 1 ~ 1':1 'I ,M:l':S A.J""i) t:, . ) I ~J1 Aa!-$...5 COMMENTS ST/L<<:c..:ru,e~ ~5 S~~ . SALE PRICE LOT SIZE VALUATION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR '/1/1 STORIES / ~tI/ S7" /cyl PORCH OR DECK ~c~".seL? ~LC# BSM'T FlNISIIlNG at!.> % I BATltS /-o/~ c: EN'I'I~ ^ I. ^ Il~ ,)..) a IV t:, WALKOUT >>0,0 t: /.s ~,47~e7 #A:/ C :VC-,c c: :e;2.u:; /?:l~,l4V7 ~/JeI E~c.L SALE DATE COUNCIL ACTION RECOMME'IID ~4dt!J() # 9~ -V"iJpa ~b~()~ ~,;}t!XXj B~fJC)o '9~ ~ g8 BoD ~~~d~~~ DATE 6-/8-~3 b SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME 11 it: l1Qel 1< IrO mer ADDRESS 5'1 de; 11 bY! b-e-r h4 J1 e- PTDN 3'-/ -1/7 - ;). 3- ~J - Dblb PROPERTY TYPE R L YEAR BUILT J q 5 ;). GROUND FLOOR AREA /7/0 GARAGE ;).. ea V- a !fCl<:i,eJ. , BEDROOMS :) 10'1 REI'I.M:ES ;;t LOT SIZE /00 TFF COMMENTS (<) ide,,//) ~ Bay S'CG 'pagfJ 1/ D ,o~ ~Jes -bDoK alsD - 65;)..5 jI'y~ber Lo... sold {Or- ;}.500{)O ;) /9D , c.ttJD\.l++he S~i'U.e hou~c 0"'- a 5i1rldllev- fat SALE PRICE VALUATION q;).. 93 /5 3IJtJO /9~()oa 7;).'100 7~CJOO ). ;J.5'j 00 ;)..'.? 3-tJ 90 t!~ ~II/ LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR SALE DATE STORIES / PORCH OR DECK BSM'T FlNISIIlNG 3D% , BATtIS 1- Felli ;-1r CEN'I'I~^1. ^ I R YeS WALKOUT Ye5 i- I- C).. COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMEND /7DOOD ~5000 d.35000 DATE ~-/g-93 .., SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME el.., ~., + fe.'...+ P. ~."'J O~ ADDRESS $"'D t.. ~a-.' ... L... PTDII 3 I. - U 7 - Z. 3 .. 2. t · (J 0 , 1 PROPERTY TYPE R '- SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /97' STORIES z s-l-"".. V .:!.&~ r-- GROUND FLOOR ^RI':^~ PORC" OR DECK 0 ...k GARAGE 3 e.~ TtI&k.,t\.a.... BSM'T FINISHING y&~ II BEDROOMS 10 , BATHS 3. Fv" 2 · t 10'1 RI':PI.ACI.:S 2. . CI':NTI?^1. ^ I RYes LOT SIZE-A,p....v I 0 S 000 . WALKOUT Y. $ COMMENTS Lot "'... $ of "". "" + ... ~ e. 0 ~ C ~ '" : ~ + 1M. .. wi /. l ~ l y i- e k r " v .. l- e", . u Co ..,. " .. k) tF ... + e ... " 0 \- ) VALUATION 92. tJ RECOMME'lID COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR -2 So 000 ~ 7 S 00. 2 C. 0 0 0 0 2."" 000 2""'000 2. J "I 000 ....., 000 S" 0"0 &of." 0.0 1\ s..t1t'~ ~ DATE S -IV - ,-' B SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME L Go ~ ... y 8 u eo S ~ e".r ADDRESS 2 o. , I> l )t ~..I S: 0 ~ a (~~ · PTON :l S -117.. J. ,. JI .. 000 C. PROPERTY TYPE It SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT ,,'- , STORIES I <:ImUND FLOOR AREA-113' rORCH OR DECK S &..... III P....t. '" GARAGE -2 Co....,. A-++&.c..~.~ BSM'T FlNlSltlNG )Ie, S. ~ /I BEDROOMS 2. II BATHS J .. F.,., , .. i- 1,'1 UIWI.M:l,:S I CEN"'n^1. ^"~ Jo LOT SIZE ,. ., .. ... WALKOUT Ye r COMMENTS A~' .. .. .. ~I:t d Co \I & l a ~ - . "'" -+ " '" . + & -e..~i &~ 4J .of ..'.1...1.1.......-4- JA+a. ~o.Llo+ ~". ~ t .. ~ ~ "'~ .f.. & I ( 1-. "'... · i.... ~ f -" .r.. t....1 ~.. k. . 92. '3 'ID &/00 &1'1 roo 1/'/ SilO " "0 '7.$'00 '7 Soo '0' roo 112. 00 0 J'1. C)oo fJ),.. .~C;:;Z ,1d{)~- DATE VALUATION RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING 'roTAL ASSESSOR ,$"- 'fI .., '3 , SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME '2tc#~o ~ hE ,Ie; tXJ<:.. K I O($c. ADDRESS S-S"'dC ~ed6E ~ooO PTDII 30- //7- ;I 3 - ~ - tJ"d;).1' PROPERTY TYPE ~ SALE PRICE,A.fIi SALE DATE p! YEAR BUILT /'IS"P STORIES d ST~I C:ROUND FLOOR ^RI':^ / ~S"~ J;;/ 7~ 3 pORCII OR DECK O&" ~ R GARAGE d} dA',-t. .IJ/7~e:v BSM'T FINISHING 70% II BEDROOMS -7' 11 BATHS d r2t:c.~J ./- ;;~ /- ~~. 10'1 RI-:I'I.M:J.:S ~ CI':NTI~hl. h II~ >' E...5 LOT SIZE 3.;1 760 WhLKOU'I' YES , , COMMENTS 7Z EA-.JL OF S "Tt:: ~s ;Zu,u .. tiFF" 4L/2tfJSS /T LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR It9~,;;J... /993 RECOMMFlID COUNCIL ACTION 3~'fIL)CJ ~~~"() 1ft) ()oa /d760" la..y~ /~.?~o L~?Sd() / ~fC<<J /v~'?()t; ~ ~ DATE ,5--) ?- ?...3 VALUATION \0 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME A ,JAJ" r:- ; II ~ 40 ~ <<- ADDRESS .." OS SU bv...Io." at-. PTDI1 2. S -1/7 - 2.. ') .. 2.") - 001 C. PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT If 2. L STORIES , GROUND FLOOR AREA 9/9 PORCII OR DECK G 1&2..c:1 P....c.~ GARAGE Z C4~ 0.. -t-.. &. "- c. d BSM'T FlNISIIlNG N~ 11 BEDROOMS Z H BAn,s 1-~ClII 'o" REI'I.M:":S , CEN'I'I~^1. ^ II~ lib LOT SIZE 91 coo .. WALKOUT Nil. COMMENTS O\J o\.,..le{.. ""elll&.. "....ft \ 1 ..",..~ ..~ .20" A c, , 0+. LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR , L ~ 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ,ro "00 8$$00 SSOOO 3<<- .00 37 Coo 33000 1',"00 -'3000 If 000 ,tf)..,,~ 'J~ DATE ~-''1-4) VALUATION I \ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME R,' c. ~ .. \It ~ Ok ~ \a C.:.k. ADDRESS 2 'IZl. S i.",\~.~ e~~1~.. t.:"". PTDfI 3l · u,.. 2. 3 - 31 .. 6~' ct PROPERTY TYPE ~ '- SALE PRICE YEAR BUILT - SALE DATE - BSM'T FlNIStllNG S'" 3 0 De c.. k Yes l..fr . -1:- '9.r , STORIES GtWUND FLOOR ARIo:A--19'1 r GARAGE 2 C A 'fa T".\..u"'cA..... PORCH OR DECK VALUATION q H BATHS I- Fun 2. CENTn^1. ^ I U N C) ~ ~ 'Of) . 13'J,Fw LKOUT Vas ;"'1 . J COMMENTS IJD F:F: S,-' "To","", a" +.,...... .2. ~...~ DCt", G6.1/l.40c. i-AJ ~...~~ ~d1UI~of.~ - l"-J, ~AJ) s~.&.NJr ., rot:J\ - ~atJs~ h~~ SoW\~ ~N~ n ~Iw~ l~~m ~ , 2. , 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~1&( '-DC J16000 2.1 OCOO J 0' 2. 00 , 0" " D I 3 ~ ~oo ~ "'"" "e +04-fOO ~ ~ DATE 6-1'1 - ,_? 1,'tRI':I'I,M:J.:S 1# BEDROOMS LOT SIZE LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR " SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME 1<4.'(" / .sct1Lle/ e ADDRESS 43,').() FHcJ1t1J.1-fe ~ Dr prDH 3 0 - i / 7 - J 3 - ). 3 -. 0 0 0 I PROPERTY TYPE R L SALE PRICE 3 J. 9.500 YEAR BUILT /9 ~ ~ GROUND FLOOR ^Rl':^ /7~h GARAGE ~ La r- affat.,heJ H BEDROOMS 5 F lIH:I'I.M:l':S ~ LOT SIZE CA (j () F F COMMENTS P he I D~ B ()V I 1" SALE DATE C, - ~ S -9 ~ STORIES / PORCH OR DECK En (jo<.PJ tbven + DeuJ(. B5M'T FlNI51l1NG &"09/0 , B^ntS ').-Rdl /-~- CENTU^1. ^ I U Yt'.5 WALKOUT Yes See p~je-. It{ ,,^ <vi I~ 5 POut( LAND BUILDING 'IUl'AL ASSESSOR Cf d- 93 /()OO~o /'(1), LfOj) Ih3btJO /b'/OfJO cl"~ f;:J::O RECOHMFlID 1'1;). L/Oo /(,tI i 000 3 () (0 '-/00 DATE S-(~-CJ3 COUNCIL ACTION VALUATION 1"3 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME ?1'9r~/CA'v- ;.(.A7~RY)l a,U/>>..s ADDRESS ~~?S F~/p?/I ~ACE prDH dIP - /) ".J-':;;:3 - / ./- tJCJ/ J PROPERTY TYPE K SALE PRICE ~~ YEAR BUILT / ttpS-'? GROUND FLOOR AREA g;;s / ?9~ I GARAGE ~ ~~/l. 19n-/KHEO H BEDROOMS ~ "'I WJo:I'I.ACK~ ~ LOT SIZE aS3?S .pi COMMENTS / /1,/ r Elf? / ,,/2- SALE DATE Alii I STORIES ,;;1 STtJ,Ry PORCII OR IlECK 'PO ~ <:... BSM'T FlNISIIlNG .::Sa ~/~ 11 BATHS / ru~,- , /- ~~ , Ai tJ ,A) E..., I/I!fII1 >>11 .J.J~ &7nG~~ 2;)A7&O CENTH^1. ^ I U WALKOUT /5 VALUATION /9'1;J.. /99:3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 3/ ?C;~ 3S'aoo 3 S OOC> 7~3()o ?8//){) 75000 /~oPO ~3/9:j/O 000 ~_~_~ DATE ~-/7-'3 LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR I~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAMEdE~ru.I+~J?I.s7/IV[,. L.6g,,"';>>G ADDRESS ~6K/) ,cAT/J?J~ ?G prOft d~-117-.,;23 -/I-~t)/h PROPERTY TYPE .:? SALE PRICE 7 ~ O/) l) YEAR BUILT / ~~t' CROUND FLOOR AREA /.;l3? GARAGE ..;} eA~ A71NoIELJ II BEDROOMS d2 1,'1 U 1':1 II,M:I':S t1.>> t:.. LOT SIZE da~ 73 ? COMMENTS S772u.C"7k4-€. ~5 ~ ~E/b.s SALE DATE q -d)01 -::?c:::? STORIES J? A-/hB~.E,e PORCH OR DECK Pd AI t; BSM'T FlNISIIlNG d~;J /I; , BATHS J-r-~. /-~;I , YES . YeS ~RMCP~.,4/#L.- C1':N'I'll ^ J. ^ I U WALKOUT VALUATION /t::J'1 ~ /9f3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND ~? '7PC; S'd)SOi) 6,;:l5tJZJ BUILDING s'Y9~() ~OD .s-e:9. 9,t;" 'lUfAL /.;.,;)~tX) //.3 ~C).5 ~"() ASSESSOR ..:5 - / I ~...B .~..Jl~J~ DATE '5 ~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Wall l;1 e- () e) F !<e I ADDRESS &/7D S-InJuJbe~r J-~ PTDfI 3 ;).. - 1/7 - J ~ - 3 '/ - () 0 tfh PROPERTY TYPE ?... , SALE PRICE YEAR BUILT J 979' C:ROUND FLOOR AREA /01'1 GARAGE ;). Car- qtfq~~.eJ /I BEDROOMS 3 10'1 RI':I'I.M:I.:S 0 LOT SIZE ;),1 ?? 'IDs ?, --ft, . SALE DATE STORIES spit'! err!-J;Y PORCH OR IlECK Dcct BSM'! FlNISttlNG 7D ~D I BA'l1tS / -Fi1/1 /- ~ CENTnAI. A I R )/0 WALKOUT /Vb COMMENTS LAND BUILDING rorAL ASSESSOR See PQge 11f - o/Jev hDuse OLt\ I avr~v- Joi ~8<L 'lS-\lVtltdt tJldev- hOCl$e {)/rfk Sffn)C/I- siZe lot- -pCl7-e Cf7- sJr3h1/y lary- JMI.tSc O\tl s;w.I1av ~;zr::..lr}r CfJ- 93 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 3/500 3750Q 37500 0;).500 ~3SDD b350D q'-lq.{JO /0/000 I/J I t?OO p~ I~~~ DATE 6~/g-qi VALUATION I~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME S+"p~.."" Yo ( t+O '-" ADDRESS Z,J.'S "30 U \ c\ -V- ~: "",...l c.. PTDII J I .. I' , · l, - I 'I - 001.. 0 PROPERTY TYPE RI- SALE PRICE SALE DATE - 19 72. STORIES Z .!!.JL L C:ROUND FLOOR AREA '7'1 t.. PORCH OR DECK S.-....... '."4.1. -I- O&c..~ GARAGE 2. Co.... A++-.c.~.J BSM'T FINISHING Y.. t II BEDROOMS 1/ , BATHS--' -1='" tl ,- i- '''''H:I'I.M:Jo:S I CENT'~^1. ^"~ Yes LOT SIZE (. t DOO . IU~'WALKOU'l' NO COMMENTS~A-k~ "lte". ~ lANd wAoS IN eorf" Ii'! ~ t!1O-'~ - hDU~~ I~ J"~d ,~ ~~c. "" o~.... \ YEAR BUILT I /.. r LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR , L. q 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~" 000 31.(000 JOO DO 0 I '4.s 0 ~ et 142 DO 0 ,.,. 2. "0 () ",3 t( 0 0 0 rl3O(Jo ++ z. 0" " -5J,.. .~..O G=:- (J..w- _ DATE S - 1'/ - 'j VALUATION 't SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME I7I/h?K J/U 6 0 ADDRESS 5395' s#~~)I h'.I~ cJ/(I2c.GE prDH d 5" - //7 - .;;l ,~ - c;/ r(' - t:)t:J 9' dL PROPERTY TYPE ;e SALE PRICE >> ~ SALE DATE L/;~ YEAR BUILT /9~~ STORIES ./?~~C/Z. GROUND FLOOR ARE^ /55'1' PORCII OR DECK Sd~.~ ~# GARAGE d t!A'~ #P*IIG~ BSM'T FlNISIIlNG s" dh H BEDRooMS.3 6 BATHS .1- /=u?';; /- ~~ 1- ~:J... . 1"1 RIWI.^CI,:s;;2 CJo:NTI~^1. ^ 1 U YE.5 LOT SIZE d t, :3~s-' ? WALKOUT ./V""uL COMMENTS //tI;rE/z/..!J/Z / S p#no .A2A/.L:J ~S ~/J?E 7)E~E212~L) ~#//VT#.//t.I~E:.. LAND BUILDING TCYrAL ASSESSOR RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION 3" ?~~ cVt7S'~o ~t's"c> y ~ ~~~ f/9StJd 7d?g~o //9 ~~ J3"_~~ 1173a:J Z:~f;td~ DATE s--/r-~.:j VALUATION 18 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME u/,'///tlm LJr!5Dh ADDRESS J30(,O :>Ivaf-fuyj PL. pro" 3S- JI7-~\-33- 061'1 PROPERTY TYPE K . SALE PRICE SALE DATE YEAR BUILT / if g7 STORIES;J C:ROUNO FLOOR ARI':A I ~~;.. PORCII OR DECK f"UoSe). Dovch f GARAGE ~ Ca.,.... Q-fftttheJ. BSM'T FINISHING () "BEDROOMS 4 11 BATHS d-Full 1--5- to' "mI'I.M~I':S I CEN'I'H ^ 1. ^ I U Y-e5 LOT SIZE ~ bOD{) S,:<-++' WALKOUT ND COMMENTS see. page b r () f Stiles bocK. - sJi1ht/(f" /CI'YeY JtIJI/.5e Wj'-f~" d-Calr gava'lb+ LfD% btJ~PW7eyrffil1t'5h OV\ lalev-/oj- C/I$D rag-e 7'-1 01 Sq/es hooK. - lavgey- hOllSo wrfh- ft,o% bCt.se~e;i7I-f;l1/sA. Dh ~;milqy- SIZe /01- t:t &- Cf 3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION ~:l ZOD 7t;SDfl 75500 I cg<ggoo It! 15tJO /9 /500 ;A.5~~ J!:.::z: ?A:A~OO 5:-/f?-'1~ VALUATION LAND BUILDING 'lUfAL ASSESSOR ,q V i \ vl/ n ~~ ~<~ ",e \J\~ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME _Dt.)1I\ ct LJ if 11 ..Ie ADDRESS 2.8' '0 Wo.J t i J e... r<J. PTDI1 31- 1'1- , ,,.11- OOLI/ PROPERTY TYPE R 1- SALE DATE - SALE PRICE FI~I':I'I,M:I':S STORIES I PORCH OR I>ECK~"'~ BSM'T FlNISIlING----Y. S , BATHS 1. -F\J l \ CEN'1'I~^1. ^' ~ Yet WALKOUT 5 Lu,!1. ~~~~ \ 3 T' YEAR BUILT 19 ., t GROUND FLOOR ARI':A 11"" GARAGE 2. C" p T"..'--u... cl.t- 5 2.. LOT SIZE 37 , OC'" COMMENTS Re ~ \J'C.rr 11 BEDROOMS VALUATION RECOMMF1ID COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR :.... -'.,._~.., ~a-PJ ~- DATE ~- I~- ,,~ 20 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME Tko"'".r S k......... s 4-. d ADDRESS -2J I) 1..0 WOO.\ S; cf ~ RJ PTDIf 3'-'17 - 2 )... 2.." - ~oo'-- . PROPERTY TYPE R L SALE PRICE - SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT 19 $ S STORIES I GROUND FLOOR AREA ,. sa ~ L PORCII OR DECK O. ~k GARAGE 2 CQ..,.. ~,J BSM'T FINISIIING Ye ~ If BEDROOMS If H BATHS I .. ~ ~ I t F I In:I'I.ACI':S 2 C:EN'I"~ ^ I. ^ I U Y. $ LOT SIZE 3 , 2. 0 a . WALKOUT Y r!I r COMMENTS'S 0 ~, F: a w. \ ... "".......... G "'v ~d..+~:4-c..l&....) Jle.w Oc....~ R.ier'" P tla.( S",(~.r b ...1.- 0-11+ Coo,,") VALUATION 92- 93 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND 2'" 'DO 29/ 100 ~ '1/00 BUILDING , ... S' '00 II. 3000 " :J 000 TOTAL 3'2.0'O_~ II $'/ 100 ASSESSOR ~. ..~ DATE ~ -,.,-'3 2\ SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME S t U A ~ t F",' '" M .. V , ADDRESS 1'7'0 t."'-c....f..,ell H, II PTDIt-3 f. .. u:J - 2. J · t 3 - 0 e I. , PROPERTY TYPE R SALE PRICE SALE DATE - YEAR BUILT /9 8 r STORIES R. 6-'" s ~ oc.O'-".1\ z. c- IS:., I (:ROUND FLOOR AREA J& 3 , PORCH OR DECK "4. I.cd P. ~ + D. Co \L GARAGE 2 r~&.tIa A-++ ~ c..~.J BSM'T FlNISIIlNG '/. S It BEDROOMS 4 , BATtIS ,,- F u It .1 · i- 1,'1 RIWI.M:I':S 1 CEN"'U^1. ^ I U y~ S' LOT SIZE ~ 3 , 0 0 I:\S WALKOUT N D COMMENTS So.Q FOLLOW IN 6- ~~N\pev.~~ ~ A-d.\'I\J~ I kJ A-<' 11\1Cl1rtf" ec t ON Am men, h~ 5>> VALUATION 92.. 93 RECOMMEND '1'2000 22.,,400 '2. '1 ~ 4 00 DATE ~ -I'i - ,.3 COUNCIL ACTION LAND BUILDING '1Ul'AL ASSESSOR 7tl. DOO 71000 ~.1.t 00. ~J'ooo 209r 000 .l' 0 ... (dIl GJtlu <- RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS 5570 Old Market Rd. PID# 36-117-23-12-0054 SALE PRiCE $325.000. YEAR BUILT 1987 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2808 GROUND FLOOR AREA 1532 SALE DATE 2-6-93 STORIES Two Story PORCH OR DECK Ene. Porch, Deck GARAGE 3 Car A tt . BSM'T FINISHING None # BEDROOMS 3 # BATHS 2-Full. 1-1/2 F I ~E\'I.M:ES 1 CENTRAl. AI~ Yes LOT SIZE 22533 SF WALKOUT Yes COMMENTS RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA ADDRESS 19555 Waterford Pl. PID# 36 117 23 11 0013 SALE PRICE $385,000.00 SALE DATE 10-14-92 YEAR BUILT 1985 GROSS BLDG. AREA 2966 GROUND FLOOR AREA 1676 STORIES Two Story PORCH OR DECK Screen Porch GARAGE 3 Car Att. BSM'T FINISHING 50% # BEDROOMS 5 # BATHS 2-Full, 2-3/4, 1-1/2 FIR EPI ,ACES 2 n:NTI~^,. ^ II{ Yes LOT SIZE 32000 SF WALKOUT No COMMENTS 22. SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME P fd1 a V'1 /...q yo ~(l ~ ADDRESS 50/0 V'),le tlll/ f<~ prDIf 3 b -I /7- ~ 3 - J 'f - 0 06 C( PROPERTY TYPE R... SALE DATE 'I '"" &'6 STORIES I PORCH OR DECK D BSM'T FINISHING (j , BATItS ;2 - Fq// CENTI~^1. ^ I H Vf!5 WALKOUT Yt5 d..40J/~'f of hoys-e.- LUas (VI ev-WJr- - l1ew I/a/ue. v.e ~{€G-f5 -lite ch4JUle Wl~; , \ VALUATION LAND BUILDING TOTAL ASSESSOR qJ- cr3 '10 10D If 0 O()O <(,f6'-1oo 1~d..9IJO 1 ~g. 50 (). ) if d..; '100 PaPLl J(,/~W!!-t RECOMMEND q;;.ooo 15300 J37300 DATE .5"""-1 g -93 COUNCIL ACTION 2.3 SUBJECT INFORMATION SHEET NAME EL ;I 2 A-I!3Er# G/.;t./ )/dtU,) ADDRESS d 79dGJ eS~/TA'T2J/4" :P L:/ PTD' 3/- //7 -;:l3 -3~ - oao3 PROPERTY TYPE J2 L. SALE PRICE A/ ~ SALE DATE AI';i; YEAR BUILT / 9 S-~ STORIES Stf'/C/7 &.v ;:r,ey GIWUND FLOOR AREA .//CJ~ rORCH OR DECK E/tLt:..dSF.o ~CN,/Z:>~t::J< GARAGE~ ('!'/'WZ. ~.EL/ BSM'T FlNISltlNG &~~,0 II BEDRooMS.3 I BATtIS / - ~~ /- ~-? , 1,'1 RI':PI.M:I':S,;2... CEN'I'I~^1. ^ I H Y E 5 LOT SIZE YO r~ WALKOUT Ye 5 COMMENTS SEE ~6E //d /~ ~~.s 'iBd4<' L#fl,6~ +OG,O~/2. ~~L. UI/TH /t)() FP See ~6E 1)'-/ /bEa;EI2-~~dA?-66'~ .llbu-sE tW/'T# 3;2 r-~ VALUATION ;99;1- /9'3 RECOMMEND COUNCIL ACTION LAND ---'- ~ S-.I~a IS / ooa / tJ I C)tJ /) BUILDING ~ ~e::JO ~ 9&)~o ~:I CJ ~ 0 TOTAL d.l/~ 0l9~~S~ aao ASSESSOR ~ ~ATE S--/8 -'-3 . - ~ // '7 '7..u.' 23060 Stratford Place . Shorewood. MN 55331 May 24, 1993 Ma.yor of Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Rd.. Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Assessment of Property #35-117-23..33-0019 Dear Sir or Madam: I would like it known that I am not pleased with the l'ls"e~m1ent. nf my home: PID #35-117-23-33-0019. The assessment of $267,000 is over $40,000 morc than a similar home to my home. located directly across the street, sold for last year ($226,500). My home is 100 square feet larger, however, does not have a finished basement which my neighbor's home has. Kindly notify me of what I need to do to appeal this assessment. -;f~~~. William G, Wilson H: 474-2671 W: 893-8670 IL/t ;1,4 1./ p<r?/ /1/ .4/ ;; /~J;/ t~'v/.'/{/./L",,~_/,A~ '7. ,,, ""7 ~.. ( ~-- FACSIMILE TRANSMl1XA~ THE PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS SALES OFFICE Facsimile machine number: (612) 893-8678 DATE: ~~~ TIME: 11: IS"' (Cem:ral) TO: ~..,.. '6 kGl-~tK)DCb ~ H:.&. MESSAGE: o.:tiu~'td l~ film \..O(,.l.Qjl~ lL1. 'J~ohtu. ~. ~~~YV\"I'~ . ,j . FROM: _,. Susan Hamley Contact Person (612) 893-8670 Telephone Number Total Number of Pages (including Cover): ;C IF YOU DO NOT ~Ci*VE ALL PAGES. PLEASE CALL ;- I 1