062893 CC Reg AgP
r
C~TY OFSHOREWOOD
REGULAR C~TY COUNC~L HEET~NG
'l HONDAY, JUNE 28, 1993
COUNC~L CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 PH
t
Following the adjournment of the reqular meeting the City council
will convene in Work session format (NO Action Taken at Work.
session)
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B.
Roll Call
Lewis
Mayor Brancel
Benson
stover
Daugherty
c.
Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City council Regular Meeting Minutes - June 14, 199~
(Att.NO.2A-Minutes) .
3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Hotion to Aoorove Items on Consent Aaenda and
Adoot Resolutions Therein
A. A Motion to Approve New Employee to the position of
Deputy Clerk/Executive Secretary
(Att.NO.3A-Administrator's Memo)
B. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat
for Allen Larson (Christmas Lake Ridge) at 6035/6050
Ridge Road
(Att.No.3B-Engineer's Report, proposed
Resolution)
C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving Findings of Fact
for C.U.P. and Variances for Vine Hill Market at 19215
State Highway 7 (Postponed from June 14 Meeting)
(Att.No.3c-proposed Resolution)
D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Improvements .
_ Shorewood Suburban Estates
(Att.No.30-Engineer's Report, proposed
Resolution)
Permit
Howard's point Marina
5400 Howard's point Road
(Att.No.3E-engineer's Report)
4. PARK - Report of the June 22 Meeting
E.
Right-of-Way
Applicant:
Location:
A. Motion Authorizing the purchase of Playground Equipment
for Freeman and Manor Parks
(Att.No.4A-Memorandum)
B. presentation of a Concept for the Maintenance and
Improvement of Freeman Park
(Att.No~4B-Memo and Outline)
.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MONDAY, JUNE 28, 1993
PAGE TWO
5. PLANNING
6. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT -
SEASON'S P.U.D.
(Att.No.6-Report)
7. DISCUSSION ON POLICY ISSUES
Funding Formula for a 5 Year Contract with the Excelsior
Fire Department - (Postponed from June 14 meeting)
(Att.No.7-Administrator's Memo)
8. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Bob Rascon
A. Review of LMCD 1994 Preliminary Draft Budget
(Att.No.8A-Draft Budget)
B. .Update - Boulder Bridge
C. Intergovernmental Relation Among the 14 cities
9. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
10. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS
11. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
12. ADJOURN TO A WORK SESSION FORMAT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
(Attachment)
Following the adjournment of the regular meeting the City council
will convene in Work Session format - NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN
DURING THIS PORTION OF THE WORK SESSION
WORK SESSION
A.**
Convene Work Session - Joint Meetina with Planning Commission
on the Transnortation Chanter of the Comnrehensive Plan
(Postponed from June 14 Meeting)
(Attachment)
B.
Ad;ourn Work Session
JCH.al
6/18/93
.'
j
1
, .
...,
'.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, JUNE 28, 1993
....
6:30 PM - PLEASE COME EARLY FOR THE MEETING TO MEET TERRY NAABWHO
I AM RECOMMENDING FOR THE POSITION OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/DEPUTY
CLERK AND TO GET SET UP FOR A COUNCIL PICTURE.
ITEM 3A - A motion would be in order to approve the hiring of Terry
Naab as the Deputy Clerk/Executive Secretary. Her resume has been
sent to you under separate cover.
ITEM 3B - This is a resolution approving the preliminary plat for
Christmas Lake Ridge as directed by the City Council.
ITEM 3C - This resolution approves the conditional use permit and
variance for the Vine Hill Market. This resolution was directed to
be prepared two meetings ago but was. not taken up at the lai-t
meeting because all five members of the Council were not present.
If anyone wishes to discuss this item further it should be taken
from the Consent Agenda.
ITEM 3D - This resolution accepts the public improvements for
Shorewood Suburban Estates which is the 11 lot subdivision on the
west side of Strawberry Lane.
ITEM 3E - This motion would approve a right-of-way permit for
Howard's Point Marina to allow a gasoline line under Howard's Point
Road to serve the marina.
ITEM 4A - The Park Commission is recommending that playground
equipment by Landscape Structures Inc. be purchased for Manor and
Freeman Parks. The motion would be to authorize the purchase of up
to $20,000 of playground equipment as recommended by the Park
Commission for Manor Park from Landscape Structures Inc.; and up
to $20,000 of playground equipment for the north side of Freeman
Park from Landscape Structures Inc. ; the Freeman Park
authorization is contingent upon firm written commitments from the
softball and soccer associations for a total of $7,000 of
additional donations.
ITEM 4B - The Commission wants the City Council to be aware at this
early stage that they are discussing the concept of a foundation
intended to fund improvements in Freeman Park and assist in the
maintenance of Freeman Park. An outline of the concept is enclosed
in the packet. This is on the agenda just as a report and to get
Council reaction to the concept. A lot of additional work will
need to be done before any such concept could ever become a
reality.
ITEM 6 Separately bound in the packet is the Engineer'S
Feasibility Report for Seasons PUD (Senior housing acros~ from the
Old Market Road intersection). A major issue yet to be 1addressed
is a state drainage easement meandering through the property.
ITEM 7 - In preparation for Tuesday evening's discussion with our
neighboring municipalities concerning the Excelsior Fire Department
contract the Council should hold a brief discussion on our current
counter-proposal. Knowing the wishes of the Council is important
in going into such negotiations.
ITEM 8 - LMCD representative Bob Rascop has asked that these three
items be listed on the agenda. He plans to review the 1994
preliminary draft budget and give verbal updates on Boulder
Bridge's dock request and on intergovernmental relations among the
fourteen cities. I have made several calls and am unaware of any
"new" efforts to change LMCD. There always seem to be rumblings of
discontent and I understand there is a committee of LMCD
considering changes to the makeup of the Commission. Bob will
discuss the issue Monday evening.
ITEM 10 - Under the Administrator and Staff Reports section each of e.
the Department Heads present should be asked if they have anything
to report.
After the regular portion of the meeting we will take a brief break
to go into work session format around tables on the floor of the
Council Chambers. The Planning Commission is invited to review the
Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan. Park Commission
chairman steve Dzurak also plans on being present.
.
JCH.sn
6/25/93
DATE
June 28
July 12
.
July 26
August 9
August 23
September 13
September 27
. October 11
October 25
November 8
November 22
JCH.al
6/10/93
6/10/93
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSIONS
Held in Round Table Format Following the
Regular City Council Meetings
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION
* Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Transportation (Comp Plan)
Badger /W oodhaven Wells - CIP Review
Budget Objective Report on 1993 - Preliminary Review for 1994
Review Garbage Collection Alternatives (moved from 7/12)
Capital Improvement Plan - 1994 - 1998
Water Policy Questions - New Developments
Operating Budget
*Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Community Facilities
(Comp Plan)
Capital Improvement Plan - 1994 - 1998
Initiate Labor Negotiations (moved from 7/26)
*Joint Meeting with Planning Commission - Land Use/Natural
Resources (Comp Plan)
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, JUNE 14, 1993
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD.
7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Daugherty at 7:00 p.m.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present:
Councilmembers Benson, Daugherty, Lewis, and Stover; Administrator
Hurm, Engineer Dresel, Attorney Keane, and Planning Director Nielsen..
-
Absent:
Mayor Brancel
C.
Review Agenda
Benson moved, Stover seconded to approve the Agenda for June 14, 1993, with the
postponement of Consent Agenda Item 3.A., postponement of the first policy issue
discussion under Item 7. and postponement of the Work Session with the Planning
Commission.
Motion passed 4/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
e
A.
Board of Review Meeting - May 12, 1993
Stover moved, Benson seconded to approve the Board of Review minutes of May
12, 1993.
Motion passed 4/0.
B. Reconvene Board of Review Meeting - May 24, 1993
Lewis moved, Benson seconded to approve the Reconvene Board of Review
minutes of May 24, 1993.
Motion passed 4/0.
1
']A
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 14, 1993 - PAGE 4
The Councilmembers discussed concerns related to residents' use of water from the
lakes and recommended that the Ordinance be strictly enforced and that residents be
appropriately notified of the Ordinance and the dangers related to domestic use of lake
water.
Benson moved, Stover seconded to direct the staff to prepare a findings of fact
resolution approving the Preliminary Plat requested by Allen Larson, 6035/6050
Ridge Road, subject to the staff recommendations outlined in the Director's May 27,
1993 memorandum and subject to approvals required by the City Engineer.
Motion passed 4/0.
C.
Final Plat - Waterford 5th Addition
Applicant: Trivesco
Location: Outlot D, Waterford (5590 Vine Hill Road)
e
Nielsen stated that subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, a question arose
as to whether Outlot D was a part of the Waterford project and whether the protective
covenants applied to that Lot. He reported that the development agreement specifically
omitted Outlot D from those covenants because it was anticipated that Outlot D would
be developed in. conjunction with the Covington Vine Ridge project. However, due to
certain watershed district restrictions, Outlot D was not incorporated into that plat. It has
been recommended to the developer that similar covenants be attached during this
platting to ensure that the architectural review process would remain the same as the
Waterford project.
Lewis referred to the Planning Commission's recommendation that the property remain
a single lot precluded from future subdivision. Keane stated that would not be an tit
appropriate condition since under the current ordinance framework, a variance request .... /
to accommodate subdivision could be presented to the Council for action.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 57-93, "A Resolution
Approving the Final Plat of Waterford 5th Addition," subject to the Attorney's
approval of the Declaration of Restrictions.
Motion passed 4/0.
D. Consider Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment - Regulations for Detached
Garages
Nielsen explained that the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will allow one attached
garage and limit detached garage structures to one per dwelling.
4
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 14, 1993 - PAGE 5
Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 276, Amending Chapter
1201 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Zoning Regulations.
Motion passed 4/0.
6. RESIDENT REQUEST TO BLOCK OFF STREET - BLOCK PARTY.
BRENTRIDGE DRIVE
Stover noted that the Fire Chief, Chief of Police, and Public Works Director have reviewed
and approved the request for closure of Brentridge Drive.
.
Stover moved, Lewis seconded to approve closing Brentridge Drive on June 27,
1993 from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. for the purpose of a block party as requested in a
resident's letter dated May 20, 1993. -
Motion passed 4/0.
~
7.
DISCUSSION ON POLICY ISSUES
Zoning and Land Use Issues Relating to a Potential Senior Center at the
City Hall Property
.
Hurm reviewed the background to the issue and the current status of concepts
developed by the Senior Center Task Force regarding use of a Senior Center that may
be located on the City Hall property. The Task Force is now requesting policy direction
and guidance regarding zoning and land use. Specifically, policy direction is requested
with regard to using the property for adult day care for over 10 persons which would
involve re-zoning and use of the property for commercial purposes including allowing
liquor service, which would involve an ordinance change. Nielsen indicated that survey
work and soil borings are being conducted and policy direction from the Council would
assist in planning of the next steps in the process. .
Robert Gagne, member of the Senior Center Task Force, reiterated that these issues are
strictly City policy decisions. He stated that at the present time, the Task Force is not
considering offering use of the senior center/community center for adult day care. In
addition, the task force is studying methods to ensure that the center would be
adequately funded. He thanked Administrator Hurm for the volunteer assistance he has
provided to the task force.
During discussion, it was noted that limited re-zoning would allow flexibility for use of the
building; allowing liquor service conflicts with the use of the recreational park adjacent
to the site; and commercial use of the property may contribute to traffic-related concerns.
Further, the Council encouraged the idea of a self-supporting facility and, in general, the
Council supported the overall concepts and location of a Senior/Community Center.
5
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 14, 1993 - PAGE 6
8. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None.
9. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS
Revised Public Improvement Process Chart Incorporating Citizen Contact
Hurm reviewed a chart developed to identify citizen contact points to improve
communications during the process related to public improvement/special assessment
projects.
The Councilmembers provided additional policy direction designed to improve public
information regarding projects.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey
.
Hurm brought the Council's attention to the results of the Service Evaluation
Questionnaire. He noted that a summary will be printed in the City's newsletter.
The Council agreed to discuss, at a work session, issues related to the animal control
program and the physical condition and lighting of streets.
I
Hurm referred to the report of the 1993 City clean-up charges and noted that the next
quarter per household cost will be $7.00. Hurm requested input from the Council
regarding the special assessment policy summary article for publication in the City's
newsletter and noted that a public information meeting on the policy is scheduled for
Monday, July 26.
Hurm reviewed upcoming meeting dates: Council meeting and work session with
Planning Commission meeting on June 28; a fire protection contract negotiation meeting
on June 29; a fire department budget meeting and Met Council staff meeting on June
30.
.1
Keane, Dresel and Nielsen - None.
10. COUNCIL REPORTS
Benson requested clarification of signage located at the Waterford site. Nielsen indicated
that 1 construction sign and 1 real estate sign is permitted; the others must be removed.
Lewis inquired about the status of completion of the sewer-related work in the Covington
Road area. Dresel stated the work was 99% completed. Lewis requested the staff to
research and report on the cause of the continuing noxious odor in that neighborhood.
6
.
,
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 14, 1993 - PAGE 7
.
I
I
Stover indicated that she plans to attend the local workshop scheduled by the MWCC
the cost allocation system for sewer service charges.
11. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Stover moved, Benson seconded to adjourn the City Council Meeting at 8:25 p.m.,
subject to the approval of claims.
Motion passed 4/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Arlene H. Bergfalk
Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
ROB DAUGHERTY, ACTING MAYOR
. JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
7
JUN 24 '93 14:28 OSM MPLS, MN
P.2
Mr. Bradley J. Nielsen
City Planner
City of Shorewood
Shorewood, MN 55331
O\~~~
300 Park Place Center
5775 wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55416-1228
612-595-5775
1-80o-75~5775
FAX 595-577'1
Engineers
Architl:l:ClS
Planners
Surveyors
June 24, 1993
Re: Orristmas Lake Ridge
Preliminary Plat Review
OSM File 5047.00
Dear Mr. Nielsen;
We have reviewed the referenced-plat from a preliminary standpoint with regard to
grading. drainage, and erosion controL We offer the following comments:
.
1)
No sanitary sewer service is shown. Lots 1 and 4 will need to use the City's
sanitary line in Ridge Road, necessitating individual home pumps.. Lots 2 and 3
can use either the Ridge Road line, or the MWCCs interceptor if a gravity line is
preferred A permit will be needed from the MWCC for any connection to their
interceptor.
2) The driveways should be limited to 10% grade; the east drive appears to exceed
this.
3) Retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height should be designed by an engineer
registered in Minnesota. Final plans should be reviewed for the need for railings
along the retaining walls.
.
4)
As all proposed lots border along environmentally sensitive. lakes, we recommend
the installation of silt fences along tbe entire down-slope length of grading
construction prior to the commencement of this work.
As alwa~ please call me with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON
jtA$OC1A;lx
Joel A. Dresel, P.E., LS.
City Engineer
Equal Oppotll.ll\ity EmploYC'f
38-'.
RESOLUTION NO._
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR
CHRISTMAS LAKE RIDGE
w:HEREAS, ALLEN LARSON (Applicant) has an interest in certain land within the
City of Shorewood, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof,
and has applied to the Council for preliminary approval of a plat to be known as Christmas
Lake Ridge; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner and his
recommendations have been duly set forth in Memoranda to the Planning Commission and
City Council dated 27 May 1993 and 9 June 1993, which Memoranda are on fIle at City
Hall; and
.
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Shorewood Planning Commission-on
1 June 1993, for which notice was duly published and all adjacent property owners duly
notified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
- .
I,.
1. That Applicant's request for preliminary plat approval of Christmas Lake
Ridge is hereby granted.
2. That such approval is subject to the recommendations set forth in the City
Planner's Memoranda dated 27 May 1993 and 9 June 1993, and the terms and conditions
contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of 1 June 1993 on f1le at City
Hall.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 28th day of
June, 1993.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
A'ITEST:
James C. Hurm
City Administrator/Clerk
:3 8.-2.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT
AND A SETBACK V ARlANCE
FOR THE VINE HILL MARKET
WHEREAS, James Pyle (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 19215
State Highway 7 in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally
described on Exhibit A, attached; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to install motor fuel pumps on the west side of
the property; and
.
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit, pursuant to ""
Section 1201.21 Subd. 4.c. of the Shorewood City Code, and a setback variance for the
distance between his access drive and the street intersection; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his
recommendations were duly set forth in memoranda to the Planning Commission dated 1
April 1993 and 29 April 1993, which memoranda are on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meetings on 6 April 1993 and 4 May
1993, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and
.
WHEREAS, Applicant's request for conditional use permit and variances were
considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 24 May 1993, at which time the
Planner's memoranda and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and
comments were heard by the Council from the City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
district.
That the Subject Property is located in a C-3, General Commercial zoning
2. That the City Zoning Code requires a sixty-foot setback between access drives
and street intersections.
- 1 -
~c".
3. That the Applicant's property contains approximately 13,598 square feet of
area and is irregularly shaped due to the location of the State Highway 7 right-of-way.
4. That the Applicant proposes to add on two fuel pump islands to the west of the
existing building, as shown on his proposed site plan, Exhibit B, attached.
5. That the existing access drive on the north side of the site promotes cut-
through traffic on the site and its grade is steep.
6. That the Applicant's site plan proposes to eliminate the access drive on the
north side of the site.
7. That the access on the east side of the site is currently unconfmed and the
Applicant proposes to create two access drives which comply more closely with City Code
requirements.
.
8. That the Applicant's parking lot does not currently comply with setback
requirements and encroaches into the public right-of-way.
9. That the proposed site plan proposes to bring the parking lot into compliance
with zoning requirements, including curbing and striping.
10. That due to limited space on the site, the Applicant proposes a one-way,
counterclockwise circulation system around the south side of the building.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the ~pplicant has satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under
Section 1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has established an undue hardship as
. defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 462.375, Subd. 6(2).
2. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's
request for a variance as set forth above.
3. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant's
request for a conditional use permit subject to the following:
"
a. The Applicant must require employees to park in the four southerly spaces.
b. The Applicant must provide a detailed signage plan including all business signs
and traffic control signs to be approved by the City Council.
c. The southerly dirveway must be clearly signed "One-Way Do Not Enter".
- 2 -
,..
.. .
d. The applicant must provide cost estimates for all required improvements,
including grading, paving, curbing, striping and landscaping.
e. A letter of credit in the amount of 1.5 times the cost estimates is required to
guarantee that site improvements will be completed.
f. The site will be monitored for potential on-street parking problems. If at any
time problems arise, "no parking" signs will be installed along the service road
and Vine Hill Road.
Phone from car facilities must be eliminated to minimize congestion on the
site.
Grading and drainage must be approved by the City Engineer.
Drainage must be approved by MNDOT.
Fuel pumps and tank installation must be approved by the Fire Marshall.
The trash dumpster must be enclosed with a masonry wall.
The Applicant understands that inadequate room exists for an overhead canopy
to cover the pump islands.
4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified
copy of this Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 28th day of
June, 1993.
BarbaraJ.Branccl,Mayor
ATI'EST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
- 3 -
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
"That part of the East 133 feet of the following described property:
That part of Lot 15, Vine Hill, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the
East line of said Lot, distant 375 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot;
thence West perpendicular to said East line, along a line hereinafter referred to as line
" A" a distance of 188 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "X"; thence
continuing West on said Line "A" to the West line of the East 330 feet of said Lot,
and said Line" A" there ending; thence North along said West line of the East 330
feet a distance of 71.9 feet more or less to the Southeasterly line of the right-of-way
of State Highway No.7; thence Northeasterly along said Southeasterly line a distance
of 124 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described; thence
Southeasterly along a line, which if extended would pass through said Point "X", to
its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 20 feet North from said
Line "A"; thence East along said parallel line to said East line; thence Southwesterly
to the actual point of beginning, and lying North of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Lot 15; thence South along the East line
of said Lot a distance of 294.59 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence deflecting right 90 degrees to the West line of said East 133 feet,
and there ending."
EXHIBIT A
\PA
y~
~ ~
0.;. / .
.9.> - ~
.1')\ . -<). <i}. _
~ o._~.
\ ~~.
\ .9~~~
y,\~
.// \ ..
~ \~~/./ ~, '
~ /" \\ \
~\// . -::.. / '---...~ '\
./ \. ,,-=:,.' ----~: ~
, \:
~ \~, ''\
,A \"
, \\
(...:, \\
"i.. \\
....,..... \:,
1/ '~.
~ \'.
U'
<.9...
-<)
'L.,
'0
U1
.,..
-::.
~
~
..s::-
o>
~
x_
~'"
~
o?o?
Ii"-::;
~
;so
+J'
BUILDING
EX ISTING
.9.>
,...
+,j
BITUMINOUS
w
Roadw~
~bles ur
w
uJ
lo.!
(}I
UI
G
UT
UT
~> j'j
'" t1 f:
~~ ~
go i3
tr1 ~
l'~
~~
t....
~z
.... 0
i:.
>tI JF:>
rs !~
tn ~O
lZ
tT1
tT1
l~
...z
EO
~n
~9
:~....rnn;---
~.:oo~ ~.~rt~ 1~
~~rt~=~ ~~;O~~.Z~M. o~
t'll rt "" !;!.ilI1"'Z.~!' U it ~H::&'~' T"
.~otB; I ~~. ~i~grt;g~=te; ;:tl
rt....o!i... .... c...... ",.Ii ~ rt '<..
~~~~"'~ rt.. ...~it~..:... ..~..~~ N"
u~..'" '" ....N~~ n~.. N8o.~rtn 1 0
U~~rt. ~~o"~rt...~g. ::~..... ~
~~~~:~ '<~~5...oa8!~~~~";Il~.il" G
.~~ ~1 ......M~ . ~nuS~. ~ 0 ·
~"'..:.& O~rtn..~z~~"UCO~CM= ~
..0. rt~ ~K .o...nzo",;.:: ~ l:
....~rt~ r~~~~~ :lZ.o~irt"rt · ~ ·
~"'~~:to ~1~i:M~ 1. .... rt
:~,gi~ ~ !7cs.~l:a~!7=u~~n t: ~
~ ~'.. ..... g .... .o~".IC"" U
5~1~~" !i; ~!S~g=~~ ~~ig~ ~ M
..... ,.~_f.....l.l. · ·
....1. I...., .._...i'~.! ~ :
II..' ...i..illl........ p -
. .i..i .'r':" ..."...... f
',:., !.ii;;l~.I...;i.l; i ·
g.~.~.I1!;1: eg'" ~::... .s.....!7rt.. ...
.g~~s. ~~~l~.~:ooi:~ ~~:~ i i
c"b ~ ." .. c ... rt 1:.... i' ...
.~Brt.. "'~_~:~~rtM..O~SO..rtz i
~.. " . ~.rt~:;;~ i~...Ml:...e:rtn =
~ot: ~~~ ~f:I1...~~..~oo ~
~.n-M _. ~'<"'.....~.. 11...~n M :
~~ 0 ~c... ~.... ~~z. ~ n
..... e .,.,o..v"-"" ~ 0 -
,'" . .;..." '., .._" n'
...... ....~.-~.. ..-.,. "'
~._ 1l~~~.~;~g~~=~:J:~ ~&
~:.'i)'" ___~_
~
~lPI!H.~
ILl I
. P (I
fflll
II ,. f
hP I '
li.lfl
IPP
nHIJ
1-..'il
filii
ill!!
l q i I
nlii
It]hi
il II
f ,I r I
! 11'1
n.l
ndl
ig!i:
~C.KO~'
o g 0 H<\(t
:J 1Il:J 0-
g~ =.>>
:tUl!~ll
rT ~ " .. t:;
.gioit~
... ~. U'I
0..0."-
~"2"'~
~ [~.=
.. ...
. g..
~ ~ 0
Po:!.: .
'll ~ :l.i:'
.. ~c
~e....'U
.g s'~ a
. ~...l
......,..
~1t:Q.
~ o."~
00.
t,:s.
Po :r.
.~." 0 .....
"It (Ill
.... ::J
o"lOo.
~ ""
IIlIII ~
....... 0
0."- :I
",ct.
~t' g
.. ~ ~..
tlo.e-s.
,-
~ ~r (i I r ,< )>
;JO
d'i 11 il! (TI
m in - I~ )>
. r - II
z". 1; I IQ .....
Q In ..,... ~u' .-.
J )~; ! Ii U1 ,,-I
~~ r I j llJ -J
c I I I 0> t'>
~ fIll U1
r; CJl
I; t I "11 ~
;-i 'TI
i I J r ~
il I f r-..
~ '"
H
I..! f ,. :s
~! I I 0 0
c: c:
m I; i ~ 0. 0.
1.1 D ~. 5'
>< f I. I ; U)
. ! j <:
:E :;' 0<:::
~ i ~ III 5'
-
m :. f :c ~
I ' J:
- i ~ -
-I -
~ ;-J
0. 2
m ~ '-" 0.
'-'
a
~ /,96'e.
I I ""~
~ ~
a a
~ ~
to ~
~ ..
I I
JUN 23 '93 16:30 OSM MPLS, MN
.
P.l .
June 23, 1993
QS'1.~h1<. FilE COpy
300 Park place center
5775 wayza'a1. BOulevard
Minneapolis. MN 55416- 1228
612-595-5775
1-800-153-5775
FAX 595-5774
Engineers
Architc:cts
Planners
swveyors
Mr. Bradley J. Nielsen
City Planner
City of Shorewood
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Improvement Acceptance
Shorewood Suburban Estates
OSM File 459030
Dear Mr. Nielsen:
.
We have periodically reviewed the referenced construction site with respect to
conformance to the plans and specifications prepared by MeriIa and Associates. It
appears the work performed was done in substantial compliance with these documents,
with the following exceptions:
1)
The stop sign and the street name sign need to be on separate posts, and. be
placed in accordance with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Oevices.
.
2)
A minor deviation in the storm sewer outlet has been noted by our field observer
with regard to elevation of the outlet pipe. The storm sewer appears to bave
been operating properly this past year, and we do not believe remedial action is
necessary. However, we recommend that this pipe be inspected prior to release
of the final warranty (spring 1994).
.
3) The developer needs to supply a video-tape of tbe sanitary sewer system.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON
& ASSOCIATES
Post-It" brand fax transmittal memo 7671
To From
Co.
Co.
Joel A.. Dresel, P.E., LS.
City Engineer
DlIPt.
Fu/#
Phono .(I
Fait
!O.I
.."t Opportunity Employer
JUN 23 '93 16:31 OSM MPLS, MN
P.2
RESOLUTION NO.
FilE COpy
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING STREETS, SAJ.'UTARY SEWER
AND STORM SEWER IN THE PLAT OF SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES
WHEREAS, February 6) 1992, the City of Shorewood entered into an Agreement with
Citywide Development, Inc. for the development of certain property known as Shorewood
Suburban Estates; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 1 of said Development Agreement provided for the Developer to
construct and install certain enumerated improvements within the plats of said property, which
improvements included streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and curbs; and
.
WHEREAS, Paragraph 13 of said Development Agreement provided for such
improvements to be subject to a final inspection by the Oty Engineer; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 14 of said Development Agreement provided for the conveyance of
said improvements to the City by the Developer and for the acceptance by the City of such
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has completed construction and installation of the streets,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and curbs, and such improvements have been inspected by the City
Engineer and found to be in substantial compliance with the applicable plans and specifications;
and
WHEREAS, the Developer is desirous of conveying said improvements to the City and the
City is desirous of accepting said improvements from the Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as
fonows:
.
1.
That the City hereby accepts from the Developer the streets, sanitary sewer,. storm
sewer and curbs, in the plat of Sborewood Suburban Estates, subject to final
recommendation by the City Planner and Engineer.
2. That the Developer shall. cause a maintenance bond to be furnished na.ming the
City as obligee for the full cost of the remaining letter of credit, to be in effect for
a period of one year from the date of acceptance hereof:
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 28th day of June, 19~.
A'ITEST:
James Hurm
City Administrator/Clerk
Barbara Brancel
Mayor
It\CML\NM\MASTER\RESWTN\PL\TACPT.RES
~D- Z.
. ~uN 24 '93 12:54 OSM MPLS, MN
P.2
June 24, 1993
()\'4~n.o
300 Park Place Center
5775 wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, M." .55416-1213
612-595-5775
1-800-753-.577.5
rAX595-5774
En~il!eers
ArCnltec:t.s
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Bradley J. Nielsen
. City Planner
City of Shorewood
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Howard's Point Marina
Gasoline line Under Howard's Point Road
OSM File 5047.00
.
Dear Mr. Nielsen:
~
We have inVestigated the concept of placing a 2 inch diameter gasoline line under a
roadway for the referenced project. We offer the following comments:
1)
The placement of such a pipe should be subject to the Fire Marshall's
recommendations, particularly with regard to leak detection;
.
.
2)
As Howard's Point Road has recently been overlaid, we do not recommend open
cutting of the road;
3) The gasoline line itself should be placed in a casi.ng pipe to allow for future
repairs of the gasoline line without tearing up the road;
.
4)
5)
Cathodic protection must be provided;
A formal plan should be prepared for review, with a record drawing for future
location purposes.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON
& ASSOCIATES
gu"
Joel A Dresel, P.E., LS.
City Engineer
5~,
c
MAYOR
Barb Bra nee I
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474~3236
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
James C. Hurm,
Council ~
City Administrator
.
TO:
Mayor and City
DATE:
June 25, 1993
RE:
Agenda Item 4A - Playground Equipment
After reviewing proposals and visiting playground sites the Park
Commission is recommending, as is insistent with the Capital
Improvement Program, that the Council authorize purchase of
playground equipment from Landscape structures Inc. in an amount
not to exceed $20,000 for Manor and $20,000 for the north play area
of Freeman Park.
.
Attached you'll find the design and placement of the playground
areas. The Commission feels that the equipment chosen is of very
high quality and will last a long time.
City funds will pay for the Manor Park equipment. The Commission
hopes to involve Manor Park area residents in playground equipment
installation late this summer.
Half of the funds for the Freeman Park north playground equipment
will come from the City park funds ($3,000 of this had been
previously donated by the Adult Softball League). Earlier this
year Adult Softball donated an additional $3,000. They will be
asked to donate an additional $2,000 this year toward the
equipment. The Soccer Association has indicated their intent to
undertake a fundraiser to donate at least $5,000 toward the
playground equipment yet this summer. The City Council may wish to
approve the purchase of the Freeman Park equipment contingent upon
firm pledges for these additional donations totaling $7,000. The
Soccer Association Executive Board meets the last week of June.
JCH.sn
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
4A
~
a:
-
Q.!
Z
c:c
:E
w
w
C
LL
SOD/COO (;Z)
=
-
..~n ___J
~U /-
l:lCl=> ./"
Vf' ,/
./
./
./
/
/
/
{
I
! ('.........
\ / I
\ / J
'--_//- II'~
.~.;~-~~~-::-.L'd'~!lh: i
/ ~ a~ I-
1<'
I ~ ~
r-1:1
\
\
,
li~
~i
.......
'\
I~ \
i2 I
"
\
W
In
<
:c
Cl..
'\.
\
/
/
I!I i~ -:::- == ::::: ./
ih ~.......
. '/' '\.
'--._~ ~~ \
iB / II ~ i = \
1ft < Vl W \
---I r ~i <:9>;1 ~
\ I)' 0. I
- - - - \ !/ I /1
/' '- \ E;~ j L - 'l (
/ \~. *l / /
/ '> I'D ;- - /' \ ~ I I
r 1 (--( ./" / _ \ II i /
I I -- w \ K . / -
I I (', ~ , 1//--
ii, t :c " ./
I Ii.! I ~ ~ 0. - - - 1\
~SE I!l ~ I' sri
I "; I u~ r----------l I;
I I I ( , I.
I I I I \ I
J i L \L'
I I /-- !i~ ~~ '-'
\ II ~,
',/:,.1 ill
---- ~
ll:: I
g I
ffi (
~ \ ...~ n I
m " q; //
\ u~ I
\ i<> /
,~ l ~/
1____ _____J
-
'-
,
\
N3SH3<ThlY ~ 'HY3
~ LO:Zl C6/tZ/90
...
9
Cl
z
;;;
~
...
:;!
:s
f
i-
II
...
'5
ll.
...
lo.
g
~
N
..
o
~
...
<
:c
~
Co.
<II
en
~
"
<
..
...
z
<...
.
.
soo/too ~
Ie
I
.
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
i
I
I
I
,
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
i
I
I
I
.
I
I
,
I
I
~--------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
J
.
I
f
;1
N3SH3UNV .T
.:1 '1HV3
o ~ * ~ ::.:.;tl,.;
z 10 ....~..s:
_ I/') '* I-~J;-o-
. ~ ~il~~-~1J
Z .,..1Il * !ElC)i~.
~ ~IO ~ :><~
0:: :gxw <b~~
::g~L~l~~ I-.~~:!>!:!~~
zQ;;::EO 1li!~lIte~~
<(J _gOj;?:z~t:~
(flZ" ~f11 tli
LL~~J. Z i"'!;!~J:'~~
<zD:l c~~~...
-,-:l-IO* il!(ffi!lll!
0:: co ~...... ~!5~r::<~
<oON * l!!i!5!Q~
wco...JU) !!!~~ <
Ola:J....., * t:E~ w
..ci5c
s
I
-
o
I
o
C',J
<:~
~
C6/f;oZ"/90
SO :ZT
~
~
c.
"
'" 0
Z
<C
~
ROO/gOO 1m
I~
?
)
/- -
/ ........ - -
/ "-.. I / "
( !J! f'I '\ (/)~ 1/ "\
\ "<l V II! \ ~ \ !J.;I '- - "
" / \ \
0_. - '-6\--~ / //-'------ \
/' . _. _. '-'" // <, <:D=>' II
/ \ --== . _. /f . \ ~i
, --.-.-.-.- ~ . /
inl '-- / ._~_._._.-/
pI ~ \' /
.~ - ,
U.~. \ '- - - ~
. __ _ 5
~ \ "\ ~
< \ ~
iE ) \a
.-;-.-.
b:I I II
~ / jl
/ /
( H <
) \
I '- I
_o-
f . _. J
-.-
.
I!I = 7
\ Rl III !lI ./'./
~ " II I.. ~ '\
;1 ')!.~ r _ ./ -'I !.\ .~ n
if '-- / \ 2-\ ~~~
'L ./ ' _ ~El ;C>~.
._ _---::..._ . _'\ ~ Ua ~
r-- I
'" ------:.=.=.-.- " /
~ .Ir I ' - - --1'-:.:'" --'r/? "" .-::...,-
0. ~~ "J I III r "
u ~I/ Ii L ~ ,. \
I ill . _0. \1 .It ,
/./ . " II I
I ~
( ..
(
\
\
'-
'\
\
'-
........
l
I
L
=
;:::
5~~
ti"..'6
",Q..sll
ca """Q
\
=
I w
<fI
. / <
I / It
o ./,...- - - '
1(/ "-
/,/ "
r''/ ( Q I \
I \ yls j
J~' I
........ /
l
-_/
x3SH3G'T't: .T
.,,' .::1 'HY3
.0.
n:ZT
:s
-""
':.~
III"
",II..
NO
...-
>/:5
0"
'"II..
~B
~ ~~..---
~9
Q.
~
~
3l:
~
.
C6/trZ/90
.
,,-
.
ROOI LOO 1m
..............
@:6:
@~(Q)
M:.~O
~O
~@,,!l;!:.
~ ~
d@5:l!!!:!I
@.Q@!;
~~g
c:::o~q@
@I
.
.....
z-+-
U en * ~ ;;illli
Z~ '* ....l:lI"":.i..:;
....,. I ia...lll i<t
. -.r * illS" :If
as ;;) l8 ~sd~"i
(f) ~.. W f"l! e
sO )I( g "'.......
ffidll')~ f-JIli!i~\I!~
~g;~Oo !i...~i~
<c<..l.~ ... il'!:I....
.~E r;- z.i~S~eli!~
ll-:::iCl;t Q~~all.
~~IX) * a~~lI!j
cE~~E' * =~~j~
<ClXl..J1I) -"'liS'il'"
WDla:J,-, '* cii:",..i!:
. i
i
:'lc:: I
a::
<:
c.
ii:
LLJ
5
0:: w
o~ 0::
~I ~
^
\J
f1
-
011
.
o
I
.
20
<(~
II
oi~
~
:::
i
(/) ..
W
...J
<(
()
(J)
-.-
-.--
...........-
.--
. ...--
......-
-'
./
o
is
lL
\:3SH30\:V .:I 'HIV3
~
Rr:;n
~6/tZ/90
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Krist; Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927- (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
.
FROM:
James C. Burm, City Administrator
DATE:
RE:
June 25, 1993
Agenda Item 4B - Freeman Park Foundation Concept
The Park Commission recognizes that with defeat of the Park
Referendum and constant pressures to decrease the use of.property
tax dollars.for parks, and Freeman Park in particular, that we need
to be looking for new concepts in maintaining and improving/Freeman
Park. The concept currently being considered is a Freeman Park
Foundation. An outline of the concept is attached. Manydetai+s
will have to be worked out before this concept could ever become a
reality.
The City of Roseville has had a Central Park Foundation for
approximately 20 years. This is a model from which we could build.
The Park Commission could invite someone from the Roseville Parks
Department and begin talking informally with the sports
organizations as a beginning point.
.
At this point the Park Commission wants the City Council to be
aware of their discussions, and would like early input from the
Council as to whether this concept, or something like it has any
merit and should be further developed.
JCB.sn
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~.
48-1
FREEMAN PARK FOUNDATION
I. WHY PROPOSE A FOUNDATION
· Federal and State Funds for recreation continue to decrease
· Shorewood voters have rejected a bond issue to raise property tax dollars for park
improvements
· Pressure to decrease the use of General Fund. property tax dollars for facilities such as those in
Freeman Park are likely to increase
· Freeman Park planned improvements are worthwhile and clearly benefit those who participate
in organized sports.
A Freeman Park Foundation is recommended.
.
ll. PURPOSE OF FOUNDATION
The purpose of a Freeman Park Foundation would be to provide for the pooling of funding and human
resources to maintain and improve facilities at Freeman Park, and provide for an organized means to
prioritize, authorize, and undertake such improvements.
. Expenditures
A
Park maintenance
B.
Depreciation Fund - set aside for long range maintenance of building, equipment, field,.
etc.. .
c.
Park Improvements
1. Short range
a. Concession stand
b. Playground equipment
2. Medium range
a. Parking vs. use problem
b. More playground equipment
c. Property aquisition for additional ballfields
d. League needs - bleachers, benches, scoreboards (separately paid for by
organizations )
c/
4B-2!
3. Long range
a. Utilites - sewer/water
b. Paved roads
c. Paved lots
d. Other base improvements, such as lighting
. Revenues
A Percent of Concession sales
B. Dollars per athletic participant (team)
C. Athletic Organization fundraisers
D. Donations
.
E.
Sale of advertising
m. ONE APPROACH TO ESTABliSHING A FOUNDATION BOARD
r
\
.
Board makeup
One representative from each of the sports organizations that use the facilities and
contribute to the foundation (i.e. Little League, Adult Softball, Youth Softball, Soccer)
Three representatives from the Park Commission
One representative from the Planning Commission (no vote)
.
One representative from the City Council (no vote)
One representative from Minnetonka Community Education Services (no vote)
Executive Director function would be served by City Administrator (no vote)
. Decisions and recommendations would be made by a majority vote of those present
. The Park Commission/City Council must approve all changes and improvements to
Freeman Park
. The Foundation Board of Directors would set fund raising goals; short, medium, and long range
improvement goals; and mediate any disputes
. Develop a method for organizations to "buy in" to Freeman Park facilities after the foundation
is established
JCH.sn
C:\FREEMAN.PK\FOUNDATI.ON
6/24/93
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
RE:
June 25, 199"3
A Planned Discussion Item on the June 28th City Council
Agenda Regarding the on-Going Fire Department Formula
Negotiations
I \.
TO:
Mayor and City Council
\.
FROM:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
DATE:
Attached please find material which has been prepared by the
administrators to present to the City of Excelsior on behalf of the
ci ties of Deephaven, Shorewood and Tonka Bay in response to
Excelsior's formula proposal.
.
In short, the proposal is to, after three years, end up with the
formula based on 50% tax capacity, 50% manhours. During the
interim three years the cities" would contribute on a flat
percentage basis. Shorewood's interim percentage is 37%. This is
very close to the percentage most of the formulas we reviewed would
result in for the City of Shorewood. The net impact on Shorewood
would be an increase of $4,160 if the formula were in effect for
1993 rather than our current formula. "Fallback" proposals were
included in an earlier memo and are not included herein.
The fourth page is an invitation to attend the next negotiating
session at the City of Shorrewood at 5:30 p.m. Tuesday, .
June 29, 1993
JCH.sn
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
7
-- -;.--.------. - --;---.-;-.-.---.-:---;-...---..-...
ii'~"--"-.",-:-.... .;...-,;~-- . .
._.:--.~:'-;:.;~-:
',T";-";- -
,0".; 0:0'
. 0.. .;.~.. : .....::.
... 00 .~ .:.:. ." : ~;~-.-~{.> ~ --. ~>-:;.-.-::~.~.:~:
./
-
. .
MAYOR
Barb Sranc:el
COUNCI L
. Kristi Stover
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
Bruc:e Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
"
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331-8927'. (612) 474-3236
NOTICE
CITY COUNCILS OF
--
DEEPHA VEN, EXCELSIOR, GREENWOOD, SHOREWOOD, AND TONKA BAY
~
'.
-
AGENDA
Have been invited to attend a meeting on
Tuesday, June 29, 1993
5:30 pm
Shorewood Council Chambers
5755 Country Oub Road
To Discuss the Excelsior Fire Department Funding Formula for a Five Year Contract.
JCH.a1
6/15/93
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1994 Preliminary Draft Budget
REV':NOS:}:::
.................................'.....-............
1992
Budget
1992
Actual
1993
Budget
1994
Budget
1 LMCD Communities Admn Levy $107,230 $107,230 $60,000 $103,500
2 Reserve Fund Allocation $0 $0 $43,432 $0
3 Court Fines $38,000 $46,347 $45,000 $45,000
4 Ucenses & Permits $85,000 $138,595 $117,300 $112,000
5 Interest, Public Funds $8,000 $14,336 $7,000 $6,000
6 Shoreland Rules, DNR City Grants $20,000 $16,000 . $0 $4,000 (a)
7 Shoreland Rules, DNR Consultants $10,000 $8,000 $0 $2,000 (a)
8 Other Income $0 lli $0 !Q
$ijhf.JWjit::*a.mfa.linjij~ijIttt::r:r:tmmmmt::r:::~~$a.]~aQ::t:::::::~:a!a(Ua~$.::t:::;:;:~;~it~~7a~::::::::I~g7~];$!QQ:::
(a) Income Prepaid at 80% in 1992
9 EW Milfoi! Program
a City Contributions $63,000 $63,000 $63,000 $63,000
b Other Public Agencies $170,000 $0 $57,280 $0
c .Private Solicitation $17,000 $25,512 $7,930 $30,000
d Reserve Fund Allocation $0 $0 $0 $27,000 -
e Interest $0 $17.722 $5.700 $6.000
$ijijlpt~i~QJ$.W\.Mnf9lt::::::r;:::I::::::r!:r;:rt::::r::::r::;;:(;;~~$thQ()Q.:::mm;:;~:jQ~i.~alilE:;:;t:;~:~:$.~i.$1Q::;::((:M:~~i.~()Qm
.
10 Save The Lake Program:
a Private Donations $0 $9,054 $10,000 $20,000
b Interest $0 $4.193 $4.000 $4.000
$.ij~lt(#i'@$.~vi::jiji:;:~ig~f:::;::I:;:!:!::I:f;t::::::::::::::::::::::::;;;'::;:::::::::::::;:;:;::;:::~!Q::;::::::;::t:::i:j:~j.g47:::::;t:;;I;:;f:lft~Q.Qq;;;;:::::::;:::;i'g4~Q:Q~g
;j:i!!;;ttQTA~ij~VgNQ~:;:::::I:;:;:::;;:;:;;!::!?:;;;;:::;:::;:;:;;:;,:;:;;:;:';!:};:;;:::,!::::C:)::$.S18;230:::::@~450~004:::!;:;;::::$420ifi42::,i::;;.:$422~5P0::
,
DISBURSEMENTS
.
ADMINISTRATION
Personnel Services:
1 Salaries
2 Mgmt Plan ImpllPT Tech.
3 Employer Benefit Contributions
$104,500
$0
$17.000
$106,643
$0
$18.777
$105,700
$15,000
$18.000
$106,150
$0
$19.600
4::::;;;;wa.tife.~~ipooi(:$:~Hi!~~~;:;:;;:;;:;:;::;;:!;J:;m;::;:::;::::;;:::;::::::;:;:;:;;;;::::;;::;;::;;:I::;:m;:;;::;~:':aj;~$.QQ:::JI:~;j:a$~4aQ;:;;;I;;;;~1:aij~1QQ.:;;:::;r;~ja$ii$.Q::
Contractual Services:
5 Office Lease & Storage
6 Professional Services
$10,130
$5.550
$10,461
$4.926
$10,482
$5.550
$11,600
$ 5 .400
7:::;:i:m9!~i::Q9.Q#~~iij~t$.i~v'9i:~:::;::;;::;;::;J;:;;;;:;;::::;:;;::::::;:::::;:::::::;;::;:::;;:I;::;:m:;;:;::::::::::~1;~~ij.~Q;:;::;:::;::::~1~~:a~7::::;;;;:;:::::m::";1:;~~Q:a?;;::::;::;:::;:
:m~i1:7~QQ(j.::
Office & Administrative:
8 Office, General Supplies
9 Telephone
10 Postage
11 Printing, Publ.
12 Maintenance, Office Equipment
13 Subscriptions, Memberships
14 Insurance, Bonds
15 Mileage, Expenses, Training
$3,500
$2,350
$4,000
$4,500
$1 ,700
$200
$5,200
$2.300
$3,888
$2,045
$3,082
$1,682
$1 ,480
$235
, $4,804
$2.129
$4,000
$1,600
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$200
$6,000
$2.500
$4,300
$2,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$250
$5,000
$3.000
i6JPiaIQffica<&Ac:lfuil"li~U~j(6ri
..':lZ3i75Q....... :..1.~)345.HH <.Z3i300...<,:$Z3,550...
SA
1992
Budget
1992
Actual
.1993
Budget
1994
Budget
. Capital Outlay:
17 Furniture, Equipment $2,000 $4,423 $5,000 $3,000
'.$j!tt9.i.if<;iptmi:!:Qijj,.~y:j:::j::j!t:!!!:::j!!:j!!:::I:j!::::j!!:::::j'jj:::II:::::!:tJ!!!:::::::::j:iI!::::r:::I:!j!::!j:j!!:J'g~m;)Q::;;;::::::j:j;!j::::::j:J'4~4ga:::::!:jjI:r::I::"$~<i9P.!:
:::!::I::::::::!::::J:a~Q9Q:::
Legal
1 9 Legal Services
20 Prosecution
21 Process Service
$18,000
$25,000
$300
$16,095
$30,011
$30
$25,000
$27,000
$200
$20,000
$30,000
ll.QQ
~:fj;Q(iU;;igiF:::f::::jj::jt::jf:jf:m::!:f:jff:::jtj:;:::jjjff:tm:::jf:;:;::::f:j:::;:::ff:;;:j:m:m;::::j:j:m:m:;:l4a~:3.QQ'mm!j::::::!m:j4ijaa$.::::m?;::::::~~~~2Q;Q;:m:;:m:m:{j:~Q~Zo.Q::
Contract Services/Studies
23 Shoreland Rules, DNR Consultant
24 Shoreland Rules, DNR City Grants
25 Lake Use Density Study
26 Wetland Inventory Mappihg
27 Public Information, Legal Notices
28 Public Access Studies
29 Mgmt Plan Implementation Studies
30 School District Boater Ed. Program
$10,000
$20,000
$12,000
$1 ,500
$3,000
$4,000
$0
1Q
$3,075
$3,000
$14,750
$0
$100
$1,435
$0
$0
$0
. $0
$0
$0
$3,000
$2,000
$27,500
$5.000
$2,000
$4,000
$15,000
$0
$2,000
$0
$30,000
1Q
-.
~1!.:tt9til;:C9.6.i.ri9i::$~:~vt.i.~~1$tij:at~i:::::;::::::::::::tI:j:j;:;::i':::::::::I:::tI::j::i~Q~$QQ::jj:::::::I:::::~~g~~.~Q:::::::I:::::jj:i,~7~$PQ::::tI:I:'j:~~iQPQ:
$~f::::j:TOTAMAQMINI$TRAT!()Ni::jjjjfm::::::{j::::::::ffmjj::::::::j!::j:::j:{j::j':j:~~$p~7~Q:f::{~~~~~o.ljti::::!j:1f~1:~fZ~~:::j:j@::j1f~7~~;$Q()
CONTINGENCY/MISCELLANEOUS
33 At approx. 5 % of Admn Budget
$11,500
$0
i
I.
$0
$0
$4:j::::::;tQT.At'APM!N>c.QNIO~G~NttY::j::j:::;:::r::::j::::j::::!::::jjj::::::::Ii:g~ij~~~Q.:::j:m::::i:g~~~Q't1j':::::::::ij;i:gii~t~a:I:j:::i:R.'ta~$QQ.:
Eurasian Water Miltoil (EWM)
. Weed Harvesting Program
35 Barge Service
36 Trucking
37 Personnel
38 Equipment Ins., WC Ins, FICA,
39 Opn,Supplies,Fund Raising
40 Contract Services
41 Contingency (at ap.prox.5%)
$114,000
$32,000
$45,000
$31,000
$16,000
$0
$12.000
$0
$20,956
$25,363
$19,113
$16,847
$0
$12.897
$0
$35,280
$43,5.60
$9,040
$30,400
$9,250
$6.380
(Detail
follows
cldSeof
1993
season)
.
4gr:jjt!]QT.At.:~kVM.Qe~ijA]!QN$!!:;:::::::;;::i::::!::::::::::I::::J::!::!;:!;r::::::!::::::::#g~Q~Q9QI:::I:J::::j:~;$.~j7~::r:::::::#1.~a~~j,'Q;;::I:::::!i.jg~~Q9Q;j:
4~!::::::$.AV~:!lH~jt;Ak~:j~RQP.RAMj!::::;!!!::!!!,:::!!j:'::!::!!':j!!;;::::II!!:!:::':':l:I:!::::::!@;!:!:::j:;:!!t,~ij;:jj::::::::j::;:;::j!;j:!f!!,:!j:,:j:;;:::~ij!:!:::'::::j:::::i;'4~QP,ij:::::
:::::::::f:j.~4~QQij:
Mfm::;TQjfAMApMN):ewM~'::$'it:~mN$l$m::::f:j::::f::f::f;$51s&ao:m;;:;:::$32S1247jj:::!::::::$4201642:!:::::::;::$4221500:
EWM EQUIP. INFORMATIONAL:
ReserVe Fund
a Accrued for Equipment Acquisition
lotus.budget94
3/24/93
$50,000
$50,000
Deephaven
Excelsior
Greenwood
Minnetonka
Mtka. Beach
eMinnetrista
Mound
Orono
Sh"orewood
'\
Spring Park
Tonka Bay
Victoria
e Wayza ta
Woodland
Totals
Less Mtka.
Balance for
13 cities
6/28/91
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION ~ISTRICT
1992 Budget
Distribution of Expense
NET TAX
CAPACITY
6,303,113
2,538,336
1,Z47,268
67,249,959
1,728,106
5 ,3 6 7 , 4 8 2
7,148,129
14,378,759
8,070,339
1,913,039
2,909,857
2,362,547
8,816,260
2,097,909
132,131,103
( 67,249,959)
64,881,144
% OF TOTAL
NET TAX
CAPACITY
7.78
3.13
1.54
20.00
2.13
6.62
8.82
17.72
9.95
2.36
3.59
2.91
10.87
2.58
100.00
4
ADMIN
SHARE OF
$107,230
8,343
3,356
1,651
21,446
2,284
7,099
9,458
19,001
10,669
2,531
3,850
3,120
11,656
2,766
107,230
EWM
SHARE OF
$63,000
4,901
1,972
970
12,600
1,342
4,171
5,557
11,164
6,268
1,487
2,262
1,833
6,848
1,625
63,000
TOTAL
SHARE OF
$170,230
13,244
5,328
2,621
34,046
3,626
11,270
15,015
30,165
16,937
4,018
6,112
4,953
18,504
4,391
170,230
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Eurasian Water Milfoil Control Program
Proposed 1993 Budget
1992 Actual
1993 Budg
Salaries (and positions as projected for 1993)
Project Manager (1) --- 360 hrs @ $18/hr
Field Supervisor (1) --- 490 hrs @ $12/hr
Asst Supvr/Asst Mech (1) --- 440 hrs @ $10/hr
Harvester Operators (4) --- 440 hrs @ $9/hr
Conveyor Operators (2) --- 440 hrs @ $7/hr
Access Maint Helpers (2) --~ 400 hrs @ $6/hr
$ 7,237
$6,480
$5,880
$4,400
$15,840
$6,160
$4,800
$18,126
Total Salaries
.'Oyee Benefits
Workers Comp Insurance
FICA Expense
$25,363
$43,560
Total Employee Benefits
$ 5,563
$1,940
$7,503
$4,200
$3,300
$7,500
Contract Services
A Mechanic -- Eq.Repair Service @ $17/hr (plus mileage)
Specialty Mechanic Contingency
Aquatic Plant Survey (provision for 1993)
Chemical Control (Diamond Reef)
Aerial Surveys
Program Evaluation 1992
. ..
Total Contract Services
$ 5,346
$0
$3,281
$460
$110
$3,700
$12,897
$4,750
$2,000
$2,000
$0
$50Q
$0.
$9,250
Administrative / Fundraising
Clerical Services Contingency
Telephone (long distance charges)
Postage (fund raising mailings)
Printing {fund raising)
Office Supplies
Public Information (film,empl.ads,video)
Legal Expenses
Committee Expenses (food,bev,mtg rooms)
Uniforms (shirts, water shoes, gloves)
Mileage/Travel Expenses
Equipment Insurance (boats,suburban,harvesters)
Total Administrative / Fundraising
$0
$30
$1,063
$933
$236
$525
$152
$0
$274
$188
$8,209
$11,610
$1 ,000
$200
$1,500
$450
$250
$300
$400
$200
$350
$250
$1,540
$ 6,440
..
EWM CONTROL PROGRAM BUDGET, 1993, P. 2
1992 Actual
1993 Budg
Field Operations
Fuel" Harvesters/Work Boats
Fuel, Service, Supplies (Suburban Van)
Equipment Supplies,Maintenance, Fuel Tanks
(Harvesters/Work Boats).
$3,302
$0
$13,545
$5,500 .
$1 ,500
$18,500
Total Field Operations
$16,847
$25,500
Truck Service
44 days (6/21-8/20) @ 2 X 8 hrs
est. $45/hr X 704 hrs=
$20,956
$35,280
SUBTOTAL, Program Operations
$20,956
$95,176
$35,280
$127,530
-.
Total Truck Service
Contingency Funds
Contingency @ 5 % of program
$0
$6,380
mgm~"~:::l~~BQG"RBM,:::e.XP:~N$.e.$,:::!::::::i::i::':i::::ii:i:::!:i,!:::::::!::::::::::::::::::::'::::::,::::::::::::::',::::!::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::::::i:'::
:::::~fi~}:!1i,7;~I:::::::::::::::::::i::i::::i::::::::::::::':i:::;i:::::i:::::'::::::::~"1!"??f'~"1:Q:::
REVENUES:
LMCD Community Contributions
Agency Matching Grant
Hennepin Cons. District
Private Solicitations
interest
.
$63,000
$63,000
$57,280
$ 7,930
$5,700 *
.
*
$0
$25,512
$17,772
m~ffil~:'jBgM~Ngi"::::':':"::::'"I:j:::":::j:':::'":"',:":"'::::::::""jj':::::::j:j:::,:::::::::":::::,:::::::j:::::i:j::::::::::::::::::::::,:'"::j::::::::::,:::::::::::':::j:::::':::::::::':j:!::::
::::::::::;:j'j:::'::::::::::::i:::;::::,~:1""Q"~;"g~'~'::'::!::':I:::'":'::'::':::::;:":'::::":"'"':',':::':!:::::"::':,:"~1"a~~:~1Q":":
*Operations share of interest
Reserve Fund
Reserve for Equipment Acquisition
$50,000
$50,000
lotus:ewm93b
CK NO
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JUNE 28, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING
TO WHOM ISSUED
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 8. 1993
11654
11655
11656
11657
11658
11659
11660
11661
11662
11663
11664
11665
.1666
1667
11668
11669
11670
11671
11672
11673
11674
11675
11676
11677
11678
11679
11680
11681
11682
6.1683
~1684
11685
11686
11687
11688
11689
11690
11691
11692
11693
11694
11695
11696
11697
11698
11699
11700
11701
11702
(G)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
League of Mn cities
void
Bellboy corporation
Griggs, Cooper and Co.
Johnson Brothers
Ed Phillips and Sons
Quality Wine/Spirits
Thorpe Distributing
Wine Merchants
Void
AFSCME council 14
Airsignal, Inc.
Joseph/Louise Bonach
Wendy Davis
Void
Metro Waste Control
Cellular Telephone Co.
Mn Sun Publications
Northern States Power
Northern States Power
Kenneth Potts
Mr. C. Hamilton Thompson
US West Communications
WMI Svcs of Mn
Boyd Houser Candy/Tobac.
Midwest Coca-Cola Botlg
Day Distributing
East Side Beverage Co.
Griggs, Cooper and Co.
Hoops Trucking
Johnson Brothers
Mark VII
Mn Municipal Bevg Assoc.
Mn Sun Publications
North Star Ice
Pepsi-Cola Company
Ed Phillips and Sons
Pogreba Distributing
Quality Wine/Spirits
Thorpe Distributing
Bradley Nielsen
City of Excelsior
Void
Bruce Benson
Wendy Davis
James Hurm
Bradley Nielsen
Joseph Pazandak
City cty Credit Union
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
PURPOSE
Regist-B Benson
Liquor purchases
Liquor,wine,misc purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Beer and misc purchases
.Wine purchases
June Delta dental
Beeper services
Sewer backup reimbursement
Sec 125 reimb/mileage
May SAC charges
Cellular phone air time
J Hansen subscription
Street light utilities
Utilities
May prosecuting fee
Recycling award
Telephone svc/advertising
Waste removal
Misc and supplies purchases
Misc purchases
Beer and misc purchases
Beer and misc purchases
Liquor,wine,misc purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Wine purchases
Beer and misc purchases
1993 dues
Advertising
Misc purchases
Misc purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Beer and misc purchases
Liquor,wine,misc purchases
Beer and misc purchases
Mileage
Mtg registration-Latter
Mileage
Sec 125 reimbursement
Sec 125 reimbursement
Sec 125 reimbursement
Mileage
Payroll deductions
-1-
AMOUNT
115.00
663.10
3,929.23
1,219.74
2,987.32
2,367.19
3,437.90
39.00
224.00
9.58
18,917.42
41. 02
4,455.00
57.81
30.00
1,993.88
1,955.13
1,458.33
100.00
230.82
227.00
2,707.30
265.50
4,585.96
9,586.60
5,546.56
125.30
493.44
5,178.45
360.00
48.00
406.32
248.81
1,894.72
3,532.20
2,702.95
10,706.75
104.44
25.00
39.20
140.00
186.40
140.00
62.86
320.00
,2.
CK NO
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR JUNE 28, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING
TO WHOM ISSUED
PURPOSE
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JUNE 8. 1993 (CONTINUED)
11703
11704
11705
11706
11707
11708
11709
11710
11711
11712
11713
11714
11715
11716
11717
11718
11719
11720
11721
11722
11723
11724
11725
11726
11727
11728
11729
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(G)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(G)
void
First State Bank
Commiss of Revenue
Pera
ICMA Retirement Trust
Anoka cty Spt/Collectn
Assoc of Metro Municplts
City of Chanhassen
Lk Mtka Cable Commiss
Cellular Telephone Co.
Mn city/Cty Mgmt Assoc.
Northern States Power
Pepsi Cola Company
Mr. Donald Shafer
Superamerica
US West Communications
Bellboy Corporation
Midwest Coca-Cola Bottlg
Griggs, Cooper and Co.
Johnson Brothers Liquor
Mn Bar Supply
Ed Phillips and Sons
Quality Wine/Spirits
Wine Merchants
Mn Dept of Revenue
Mn Dept of Revenue
US Postmaster
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Meditation handbook
Mar/Apr/May animal control
Meeting tapes
Cellular phone air time
Membership renewal
Utilities
Pop machine rental
Recycli"ng award
Gasoline purchases
Telephone svcs
Liquor purchases
Misc purchases
Liquor,wine,misc purchases
Wine and misc purchases
Misc purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Wine purchases
May sales tax
1/2 June sales tax
Postage for machine
TOTAL GENERAL
TOTAL LIQUOR
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
-2-
AMOUNT
5,829.06
982.01
2,034.77
641. 57
126.50
19.00
3,049.00
100.00
10.92
60.00
1,445.63
10.65
50.00.
975.99
48.93
6,400.26
265.29
10,833.82
3,722.88
37.84
744.66
2,977.86
19.50
10,239.19
5,852.59
750.00
.
46,966.92
104.126.23
151. 093 .15
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING
FOR JUNE 28. 1993 MEETING
CHECKt:f
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
11731 ARDO. ARDO, AND EICK
DEPT.
Al10UNT
1992 AUDIT SERVICES
199'2 {.-~UD I T SERV 1 CES
1992 AUDIT SERVICES
1992 AUDIT SERVICES
1992 AUDIT SERVICES
FOR ABOO. AGOO. AND
PROF SER 3,060.00
WATER DE 408.00
SEWER DE 408.00
-------- 612..00
-------- 61.2_00
EICK 5,100.00
*** TOT (,L
11732 RAL mil I N SUPPl.. Y C0l1P(~NY
WOODHAVEN WELL MAINT
11733 BENNIS. HOWARD
PW SITE TILL.ING SVCS
11734 BRC El.ECTTONS-MIDWEST REG L.IOUOR l..ICENSE FORMS
W~':%TFR DE
PROJECTS
GFN GOVT
CITY ~~Al:.l.. DECK Sl.JPPl..IFS -----.---
1.1735 C.H CARPENTER LUMBER
.17:;;6 DEM-CON LANDFILL, INC.
TIPPING FEE PAR~S &
1:1.737 FFHCKsm.L" r~C)I...F: F.(). JUL.Y (~SSE~3SlNG FEE
ASSFSSHJ.G SUPPL IES
*** 'TOTAL FOE' HHCKSON,.. FWL.F E.A.
11738 EXCFl..SIOF<,-.CTTY OF
SAN SWR RENTAL FEE
11739 FRONTIER EL.ECTRIC
WIRE OVERHEAD CRANE
11740 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALI..., Ir.J. ONE -"C~>;L L. SEF<,V ICES
ONE-CAl.L. SERVICES
*** TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL
11741 HEN~..J,EPHJ. COUNTY Tf"EASURER COUNTY POSTAGE
.174~)' HOISINGTON GROUP INC:. P(~}-=<K PLANNING SVCS
11743 HO~I70NS, INC.
PROF SEf-=<
Pf~OF SER
3 ~ 1 22 .. t)~5
snJF}~ DE
F)RO,JECTS
'354.36
40..00
12.59
10.82
22.50
3,098.00
24.65
1,852.80
395.00
WATER DE 27.00
SEWER DE 27.00
54.00
GEN GOVT
PARKS &
~10SATC MOUNTED FOM1 cm<E Pl..At-.J.NH!G
1.1744 1..ABOf~ RELATIONS ASSOC_
SVCS Fi'ErmEF<,ED
11745 LAND-DE-CON CONTRACT PAYMENT
11746 L.ARKIN. HOFFMAN. DALY... AUDIT RESPONSE
11747 ~1TI DTSTRH3UTTNG cm1P(..)t-N ~1PdNT SUPPl.. lES
11748 MET}~O SALES, INC. COPTER SUPPL IES
11749 METRO WASTE CONTROl.. COMM. JUL.Y CONTRACT PAYMENT
11750 METRO WEST INSPECTION SVC CONTRACTED INSPECTIONS
1.1751 MIDWEST ASPHAL.T CORP.
nL r:~Cl{TOr:) SUPPl.. T ES
1ll!':)2 ~1N ;:)UN PUBL TCATTDHS
PUF;L T SH I NG
11753 MINNFTONKA INTERIORS
SCREEN WAL.l.. nOARD
-3-
ADMIN
PROJECTS
PFWF SER
PUB WKS
GEN GOVT
6..67
1,787.43'
532.50
264.00
5.812.00
'3.50.40
5.93
?-'.f:,7 . 9~3
SEWER DE 30,795.67
STRFFT::-:~
PROT INS 600.00
9~3~? __ ()4
GEr.J, GOVT
~lm1IN
-::?3 ~ 7f)
~~3 _ 15
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CHECK APPROVAL LISTIHG
FOR JUNE 28, 1993 MEETING
CHECKI VENDOR HAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT
-------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------- -----------
11754 MOUND-CITY OF
JULY CONTRACT PAYMEHT
11755 MUHTTFCH, INC. JUl.Y CONTRACT PAYMENT
,JUL Y COrrm(.H~T PAYt1ENT
*** TOTAL FOR MUNITECH, INC.
11756 NAVARRE AMOCO TIRE REPAIR
11.757 Nt'iVARRE TRUE VALUE MAItH SUPPLIES
t1A I NT Sl.H:JpL I E:S
*** TOTAL FOR NAVARr",F. TRUE V 0\11.. UF
11758 OIL-(~TF\' PRODUCTS, TNC.
HYDRAULIC HOSE REPAIR
11759 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE
Bm.JSH H?'UL I NG
117 M) SCH~~AAF~
R~~NK STAMPS
117,<:,1 SO LK MTKA PUB S(.~FFTY m::p ,1UL Y CONTF~ACT P~~YI1FNT
11762 TIME SAVER OrF SITE SEC MINUTES
1'1Tr.1UTFS
*** TOTAL FOR TIME SAVER orF srTE
11763 nJIN CrTY WATr::'R CL TNIC
MAY WATER TESTING
11764 W.W. GRAINGER, INC
IjlJOODH(Yv'Fl'..l v.JEt. L t1(.'i T t.n
11765 WARNING LITES OF MN. INC. SIGN RENTAL.
11766 WATERPRO METERS AND ACCESSORIES
11767 WILEY, TIM COUNCIL PICTURES
117,~,8 !;'JOODLAKE S(::.t-nT(.~F!Y SVC SPRING CLE(~NUP
11769 7IEGI.ER. INC. PW SUPPLIES
***
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
***
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
POLICE P
1,146.27
WATER DE 3.410.00
SEWER DE 2,790.00
6,200.00
PUR WKS 24.00
HUN BLDG 8.91
CITY GAR 18.01
26.92
PUR !;'JKS
....,.0
,~. ..
TRE:E MA I
217.60
GEN DOVT
64. 4 f.,
POLICE P 32,468.64
GFN GOVT 253.50
PLJ::.NN T NG 58.50
::';12.00
vJATEFi' DE
20.00
v.JA TEF< DE
148.50
STREETS
47.' qo
, I.,)
f)''ll .. {-.,'/
~~ATF.R DE
9.S.00
FWCYCI.. TN
16,125.47
PUB vJKS
198.09
110.256.25
261,349.40
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 28, 1993
CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER FOR JUNE 15. 1993 PAYROLL
207406 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours 665.90
207407 Void
207408 (G) Chad Akins 9. O' reg hours 45.71
207409 (L) Scott Bartlett 24.5 reg hours 140.54
207410 (G) Charles Davis 80.0 reg hours 677.14
207411 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 720.15
207412 (L) Cory Frederick 37.5 reg hours 169.31
207413 (L) John Fruth 13.75 reg hours 77.20
207414 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 633.07
207415 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,540.97
207416 (L) Brian Jakel 64.5 reg hours 317.17
207417 (G) Dennis Johnson 82.0 reg hours 775.31
207418 (L) Loren Jones 21.0 reg hours 102.23
.207419 (L) Martin Jones 17.5 reg hours 71.-32
207420 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 630.22
207421 (L) Mark Karsten 33.0 reg hours 176.71
207422 (L) Sandra Klomps 14.25 reg hours 74.35
207423 (G) Anne Latter 64.0 reg hours 701.48
207424 (L) Susan Latterner 31.5 reg hours 170.72
207425 (G) Colleen Lindskoog 17.0 reg hours 89.89
207426 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours 754.37
207427 (L) Russell Marron 28.0 reg hours 154.39
207428 (L) Jill Moore 7.25 reg hours 37.83
207429 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 804.07
207430 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 702.25
207431 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 953.52
207432 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 1,033.73
207433 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours 785.94
207734 (L) Brian Roerick 15.0 reg hours 83.95
.207435 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,225.32
207436 (L) Brian Rosenberger 36.5 reg hours 189.21
207437 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours 388.36
207438 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 80.0 reg hours 579.74
207439 (G) Ralph Wehle 80.0 reg hours 634.17
207440 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 614.44
207441 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1.189.46
TOTAL GENERAL 14,512.19
TOTAL LIQUOR 3.397.95
TOTAL PAYROLL
17.910.14
-5-
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stove.r
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
. Bruce Benson
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO:.
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
.
DATE:
24 June 1993
RE:
Joint Meeting - Planning Commission and City Council - 28 June 1993
FILE NO.:
405 Comp Plan - Transportation
Enclosed for your review is the . latest draft of the Transportation Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan. At its last meeting the Planning Commission recommended that the
Chapter be referred to the City Council for the joint meeting scheduled for 28 June.
Please note that the text shown in italics highlights material which is different than the 1981
Comprehensive Plan. Once approved by the City Council, a final draft will be prepared and
distributed.
We will distribute a Chapter Summary at the meeting on Monday. Although the Chapter
Summary will be the focus of the meeting, please review the full chapter so that we can
discuss any further modifications before putting this section. of the plan aside, pending
community review early in 1994.
If you have any questions relative to this section of the Comp Plan, please do not hesitate to
call me prior to Monday night's meeting.
cc: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
Joel DreseI
Planning Commission
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
..
,
,{
. Introduction
Transportation planning, especially in urbanized areas,
should place emphasis on the total transportation system
rather than just one or more isolated facilities. It should
encompass all modes of transport which are economically
feasible to the community. The City must provide or
ensure that there is provided, a safe, efficient and
convenient transportation system which limits negative
impact on the environment at the lowest cost consistent
with the health, safety and welfare of the public.
The Shorewood Transportation PlaIl describes
Shorewood's existing transportation system by functional
classification, identifies problem areas within the system
and recommends improvements to resolve those problem
areas. The plan also recommends right-of-way and
roadway widths, which would provide continuity within
the street system.
.
Although emphasis in this element of Shorewood's
Comprehensive Plan is placed on the street circulation
plan, there are a number of other transportation related
components that deserve consideration. They include
mass transit, pedestrian/bicycle circulation, railroads and
aviation.
.
5/93
TR-I
. Transportation f30al
and Objectives
.
.
6/93
Transportation Goal
The City shall provide and maintain a safe and efficient
system of transportation, sensitive to the needs of
residents and the environment of the community.
Transportation Objectives
1. Reduce the need for transportation facilities by
combining or concentrating various land use
activities, when and where feasible.
..
2. Promote regional transportation facilities which
are safe, direct, convenient and environmentally
sound.
3.
Design safe, efficient and economical local
transportation facilities based upon the needs of
neighborhoods, integrating these facilities into the
community and regional systems.
4. Utilize a comprehensive system and approach to
transportation, giving due attention to all modes
and related facilities.
5. Assign priorities to various travel routes, modes
and programs, then formulate and implement a
corresponding action and development effort.
TR-3
.
.
.
Transportation
Issues
Highway 7 In 1987 Shorewood participated with several
area communities, MNDOT and the Metropolitan Council
in the preparation of a Corridor Study for State Highway
7. Although the study identified a number of
improvements between State Highway 101 and Smithtown
Road, there are several areas which deserve additional
detailed study. Timing of improvements also needs to be
addressed.
Christmas Lake RoadlHighway 7 Shorewood has
approved MNDOT plans for upgrading the intersection of
Christmas Lake Road and Highway 7. The City of
Greenwood, however, opposes all of the alternatives
which have been offered to date. Since the intersection
poses serious safety concerns in its current configuration,
it is important to reopen discussions with Greenwood and
MNDOT to arrive at a design solution which is
satisfactory to all parties.
Vine Hill RoadlHighway 7 Plans for upgrading this ;
longstanding problem intersection have been approved,
but construction is not scheduled until 1994. Since this
intersection is considered an integral part of the solution
to traffic problems in the southeast area of the
community, it is important that its upgrading be delayed
no further.
County Road 19/Country Club Road There is a
tendency for traffic southbound on County Road 19 to
use Country Club Road as a shortcut to westbound
Highway 7. Traffic counts south of County Road 19
exceed 3000 ADT.
Heavy traffic along County Road 19 at times creates
considerable congestion at the intersection of Country
Club Road and County Road 19. Although private
property development on various sites has helped defme
and limit access points, additional improvement is
needed. It should be realized that resolution of the
problem necessitates coordination between Shorewood,
Tonka Bay and Hennepin County.
TR-5
5/93
.
Municipal State Aid System In 1989 Shorewood's population exceeded 5000, making the .
city eligible for MSA funding. The MSA routes currently designated require review as well
as the design standards for construction.
Fire Protection Due to the narrow surface widths of certain streets in Shorewood, a serious
question exists over the adequacy of road access for emergency vehicles. As the availability
of municipal water is quite limited, fire fighting efforts are generally dependent upon the use
of tank trucks. However, on narrow roads there often is not sufficient room for tank trucks
and pumpers to pass each other, and thus fire protection efforts may be critically
jeopardized.
Mass Transit Shorewood, not unlike many outlying communities wi~in the metropolitan
area, desires, but does not have the benefit of readily available public transit services. Given
Shorewood's low density character, traditional transit services do not appear to be
economically feasible at this time. However, alternative methods of providing transit service
(e.g. park and ride sites) could potentially be introduced and thus, such alternatives should be
explored thoroughly.
Bikeways/Trails Although viewed primarily as recreational these facilities relate closely to
other transportation modes. It is important that planning for streets take into account the safe
movement of bicyclists and pedestrians. .
.
.
TR-6
5/93
.
Transportation
Policies
General
1. Transportation facilities shall be planned and
improved to function in a manner compatible with
adjacent land use; in those instances where the
function of a transportation facility has changed over
time to become incompatible with adjacent land use,
a program to eliminate this incompatibility shall be
established.
2. Land use controls shall promote combined andlor
concentrated types of activities. in the high intensity
use districts to reduce travel and promote preferred
modes of transportation.
3. All means of transportation and related facilities
shall be considered as one system and therefore
coordinated and related comprehensively.
. 4. Transportation facilities shall be planned and
designed to conserve natural resources and minimize
the total need for ongoing public investment.
5. The transportation system shall be developed to
focus on activity centers of Shorewood and
neighboring south shore communities.
6. Transportation planning and implementation shall be
coordinated with neighboring and affected
jurisdictions.
7. Special consideration and attention shall be given to
persons who must rely on means other than the
automobile for transportation.
8. Dependency upon automobile-oriented transportation
shall be reduced where feasible, and where possible
higher priorities shall be assigned to
pedestrian/bicycle and mass transit travel.
.
TR-7
2/93
9. The state and county highway system shall complement and facilitate local movements
provided by local streets, bicycle trails and Pedestrian facilities. A line of
communication shall be maintained with county and state highway officials in order to
ensure that planned improvements are consistent with the goals and objectives of the
community .
.
10. Early and continuing citizen involvement shall be provided for and encouraged in
transportation planning and implementation projects.
Streets
1. A functional classification system for the street system in Shorewood shall be established
giving due consideration to the Metropolitan Council's Functional Classification System
for streets and highways, as may be amended.
..
2. All local or residential streets shall be designed to prevent penetration of through traffic
and shall direct traffic to collector or arterial streets.
3. Land access onto major streets shall be limited or prevented wherever possible.
4. Vehicular access onto all types of arterials shall be minimized and limited to points of
adequate distances between intersections, with property signalization and/or merging.
5. Street parking shall be prohibited or limited on arterial streets.
.
6. All intersections require proper visibility, design, and control to prevent accidents and
violations.
7. Service roads paralleling major arterials shall be controlled to reduce traffic conflicts,
hazards and resulting accidents.
8. Single-loaded frontage roads shall be discouraged in the future.
9. The amount and diversity of traffic signing shall be reduced and an updated and an
improved system is to be maintained.
10. Relate and phase street improvement to area land development in order to avoid
interrupted or inadequate access.
11. New developments shall be required to have curb and gutter. Curb and gutter shall be
considered for existing streets where drainage is a problem. However, other drainage
solutions shall be considered where more economical and practical.
.
J
2/93
TR-8
.
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
.
12. In those areas where incomplete street facilities exist, action shall be taken to plan,
design and develop a street system which reflects the highest standards and relates land
use to transportation needs and policies. Action shall be taken immediately. to reserve
required rights-of-way to prevent redundant additional cost and difficulties.
13. Where feasible and practical, include provisions for other transportation modes, i.e.
pedestrian, bicycles, etc. in street and highway improvement plans.
14. The amount of land devoted to streets and the number of street miles shall be minimized
through use of such techniques as planned unit development and clustering of activities. .
15. The City shall consider organized waste collection in order to minimize damage to city
streets.
Parking
.
1. No development or expansion of activities and uses shall be permitted unless adequate
off-street parking is provided.
2. Parking requirements imposed by the City shall be periodically reviewed and studied to
ensure supply is reflective of demand.
Parking shall be developed in a fashion which conserves land, allows joint utilization
and minimizes conflicts with moving vehicular traffic, pedestrians and cyclists.
Minimize parking lot access to public streets to the functional minimums.
The City shall establish standards fqr parking lot landscaping.
The City shall seek reduction in the demand and resulting space requirements for
parking through improved pedestrian and transit facilities and land use development
coordination.
Mass Transit
1. The extent of service and use of mass transit is to be highly encouraged by the City of
Shorewood. Working in conjunction with the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the
City shall work toward creating markets and toward improving transit service on both
the Metropolitan and local scale and on both the immediate and long range time
framework.
2. Attempts shall be made to have transit service available with rider conveniences such as
shelters, in the activity centers of the community.
2/93
TR-9
3. Strive to develop transit service for those who do not have other transportation
alternatives.
.
4. Land use policies and development shall encourage transit ridership by concentrating
and consolidating high density residential as well as commercial and employment
activities along established or potential transit routes.
5. Transit service, through related improvements and land use policies, shall be encouraged
by the City during non-peak, non-rush hour periods in addition to peak and rush hour
periods.
6. Shorewood business districts shall be encouraged to establish themselves as transit
"stations" or suburban collection points through provisions for park and ride, transfer
routes and direct express service to other commercial and employment activity centers
of the metropolitan area and southwestern subregion. ·
7 . Availability of transit service, notably during rush hours, to activity areas and regional
centers in other communities shall be encourag~. .
8. All potential means and methods of providing and improving transit service (school
buses, taxis, etc.) shall be explored.
Pedestrian/Bicycle
1. Where possible and economically feasible, a separated travelled surface shall be
provided for pedestrians and cyclists.
.
2. Special attention shall be directed and faciliites provided for pedestrian movement and
access in areas in and surrounding schools, churches, parks, commercial and service
centers.
3. Pedestrian street crossings on heavily traveled streets shall be clearly marked and
lighted.
4. All street improvement programs and projects shall include consideration of facilities for
pedestrians and bicycles.
5. Major streets in Shorewood shall be designed to protect pedestrian and bicycle
movement paralleling traffic.
6. Encourage new development to respect the pedestrian/bicycle system and where possible
to contribute to the City right-of-way and development costs.
.
2/93
TR-lO
.
.
.
Transportation Plan
5/93
Streets - Functional Classification System
. It is recommended that the Metropolitan Council's
Functional Classification System Criteria fot Roadways
be used as a basis for classifying and developing
Shorewood's street system. The following two pages
define the various components of the system and illustrate
their typical sp~tial relationships. It should be realized
that this system should be tailored to fit Shorewood' s
specific development character and needs. Cross sections
of various roadway types can be modified to City
specifications. These specification~ should be
incorporated into the improvement section of the
subdivision regulations.
In general, Shorewood' s streets can be classified
according to use as local, collector, minor arterial and
intermediate arterial streets. A local street is designed to
discourage through traffic, primarily providing access to
immediate adjacent land. Moving traffic is a secondary
function. The collector street intercepts traffic from
residential areas, etc., and carries it to or from the
arterial system and community activity centers. Minor
arterials move traffic between subregions with direct land
access being limited. Intermediate arterials also connect
subregions, carrying higher traffic volumes and providing
access to major traffic generators:
Page TR -14 illustrates the functional classification plan
for the south Lake Minnetonka area and shows how
Shorewood relates to the regional system. The page
following provides a more detailed overview of the
proposed transportation plan for the community. The
following is a discussion of each functional classifiCation
as it pertains to the City of Shorewood.
TR-ll
,
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR ROADWAYS
Accessibility Focus
level of Mobility
System Access
Trip Moking
Service Performed
Principal
Arterial
Connects 011 urban
subregions with one
another; connects
urban and rural
service oreas with
metro centers;
connection to out-
state cities.
Provides high level
of mobility within
urban and rural
service areas and
to mo jar outs tote
cities.
To other principal
arterials, intermed-
iate arterials, and
selected minor
arterials, no direct
land access.
long trips at highest
speed within and
throug h the metro
area. Express
transit trips.
Spacing
TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS
location
land Access
i. Urban
2. Rural
Vehicles carried
Posted Speed Limit
Right-of-Way'-'
3-6 miles depend-
ing on trip density,
transit, minor
arterial spacing
and location of
existing facilities.
In natural community
separations defining
development and not
separating it.
None
None
Urban 20,000-
100,000, Rural
5,000-SO,000
Urban 45-55
Rural legal limit
300'
Transit Accommodations Priority to high
occupancy vehicles
and transit in peak
periods.
SOURCE: Metrapolitan Council
Intermediate
Arterial
Connects two or more
subregions; provides
secondary connect ions
autstate; complements
primary arterials in
h ig h vol ume corridors.
Provides high level of
mobility within and
between subreg ions.
To principal arterials
intermediate arterials,
minor arterials, and
high volume collectors,
no direct land access
except major traffic
generators.
Medium distance to
long trips at higher
speed within the
urban area. Express
transit trips.
1-3 miles depending
on spacing of princi-
pal arterials and
minor arterials,
transit, trip density
and location of
existing facilities.
In natural community
separatians defining
development and not
separating it.
Mojor traffic
generators.
Freestanding growth
centers and ruro I
town centers.
Urban 10,500-
50,000, Rural
2,500-25,000
40-50
legal limit
100-300'
Preferential treat-
ment where needed;
bus stops separated
from through traffic
lanes.
Minor Arterial
Connects adjacent
subregions and
activity centers
within subregions.
Provides mobility
within and between
two subregions.
Collector
Connect' neighborhoods
within and between
subregions.
Mobility between
neighborhoods and
other lond uses.
To principal arterials To minor arterials
intermediate arterials, other collectors,
minor arterials, and locai'treets, land
collectors, restricted occess.
direct land access.
Medium to short
tr ips at moderate
to lower speeds,
local transit trips.
0.5 - 2.0 miles
Pri mori I y serves
collector and distri-
butionfunction for
the arterials system
at low speeds,
local transit trips.
0.25 - 1.0 miles
On edges of develop- On edges or within
ment and neighbor- neighborhoods.
hoods.
Limited direct
land access.
Commercial, indus-
trial, and high
density residential
uses. No access to
single family use.
Urban 5.000-30,000
Rural 1,000-10,000
35-45
legal limit
66-150'
Preferential treat-
ment where needed
in activity centers;
bus pullouts where
required based on
percentage and traffic
vol umes
Some limitation on
direct land access.
Ac:ceS! to ogricuhurol
uses with limits on low
density residential.
Urban 1,000-15,000
Rural 250-2,500
30-40
35-45
66-100'
Pavement, i nrersections
and bus stops on bus
routes designed for use
by regular transit buse,.
.
local
Connects blocks
within neighbor-
hoods and specific
activities within
homogeneou:
land use areas.
Mobility within
neighborhoods
and ather homo-
geneous land
use oreas.
To collectors,
other I oca I
streets, land
access .
Almost exclusively
collection nnd
di!ltribution,
short trips at low
speeds.
1 black
.
\'1ithin neighbor..
hoods and at lI.,r
homogeneous
land use areas.
Direct land occess.
Direct land access.
Urban 1,000
Rural 1,000
Maximum 30
Maximum 30
50-80'
Narmally used as
regular bus route,
only in "on-
reiidentiol areas;
used as requir ed for
speciatized transit
service with smalle,
vehiclc\ in Icsi-
dentiololcn\.
.
TR-12
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ...........: ............ ...........................:
............ ......
.
.
.
.
.
\ MAJOR CENTER
.
K
F=31
.
"'''''''i--
.
.
.
.
~1.2MI
.
.
.
.
.
*
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
.... INTERMEDIATE ARTERIAL
............ MINOR ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR
----. LOCAL
3.6MI
~
\:~::V'~ -
/ r-
- 7"-/ I
I "_/'"
\0 ,_ ,./ ...
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
f ·
...........
~
M
\....-L-I
~
:
.
1/2.2 MI --*1/4.1MI~
Not to t(;lIle
D
D
.
INTERCHANGE WITH NO LAND ACCESS
INTERCHANGES WITH LAND ACCESS
GRADE SEPARA TlON
SIGNAL OR FOUR.WA Y STOP
SPACING CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Source: Metropolitan Development Guide
.
TR-13
rYJbf{~ .!v> ~~-~' _J. : //~~..; T4 ~
;....::,,\,. 0 \. .......~: ........~~.......r~~l~-./"'.. :.
: ....:,...: .\": ~~ t" '. i....f:.. ~~ I'~' ."f
11.-. .. \.l . '. 1,.. ...."...,. . / oJ ~'..
....-1 s...~;,.~.;1=--=':7~~~--'-'4~ . . ~: \. ~ ....
: .... J::"w1..;.;.TI;.~..~Jrr'':.:!.'~''~''''''r.;:.. ~;.; ROO':::'
. ;.. . '"- I ~~.: c... .
. L>:': !i i~ · !~ :__1:' :. J ~~~
,,'. ;' ~. ~~ . .... r- ....~.~.. '1:
... '/...__.J...-Y~- -u;J=::;::4 t ~ -...( a:-- ...... ..-
'"1' "-1 ([-.. -" ..;-~~.~. . :.;..... i'
"'\1 ~ . ,J ;'1; . ~..... kJ~: \ ..~/. ~-
..-1'1 '/:'~ -~,.. z:C } .r 0 I
~ ,,: t .. ~ .....v-. . ..:-c~y ..' .:.
t I~..... . I . . u.... .' E
~~-:..'''' f I~ _1111 ..., In'I'.' C .-= E L" '.- --....
! "-...1-7\ ~\ ,~.,.J1: I ~ r'~;:~' .l :
"':"-:/1 ~.3 : ~~~ ~...'..' ~
:): ~-:::~.) .. ,..~,.. ........i~; "~ ~.:.. I~"
...1-:. L ..~.. ~#.-. '-. +.II'''Q:.
~ - 'j .. .-. -.. .
.. . . . . '. I~ .,..... I
I l.....;,: , \
I ."\..~ ~
· . ~O~~t
. ......,.%,.J
I .: .
I
I:
..
i:
I'
I"
, :
""'t- .
E$
o
ifl
~
Z
Z
~
~
. \
...
'"
'\
\
'.
'-
.E
u
G)
<3
CD c:
'- a
.2 Cl:
L2 c:
'- .-
0 a -c
.... ,- CI)
u .... VI
G) c: 8-
- CD
8 .... ~
~
. . *
C .
I .
.
ca .
-
0.
~ C
0 0
.-
~
~ ca
~
.. '0
0 1-
'-
Q)
C- .g --
... .:(
~ tn CD a
.... ....-G
C '- .-
~
<: .... Q)
~ ca ,g --
-c '-
c <
.. a. Q)
0 I- ,- E '-
u 0
c CD c:
";: .... :E
=0 ca c.. .E
CD I . I
..
ifl <( .
,
,
~
;;
. .
:":
0.-
~
-
..r::
'>
E
CD
--
VI
>-.
Vl
c:
o
.-
... f...
.E . !J A
...,' IV
8-
en
c:
a
..=
.2:-
c:
:J
(3
....::~~ 1.~"~~~i~'C'.d-~~--:. lI. .- V---~-7
-;.-- T~. ~. : ~~" .' ,... "~i "lFl rrJE-_. I.
'. '1_ :: ... /''; I;: .. 0.. .. "._H :-,
l". .. ~ ,8~: \,./ i: I ~..: ~ : ~~:O" .
.-..., "1"-'<: (.:~'\ r"1 ~:'." ?."
". '''~;''''~~ tlii::"..,'~~; r, ! ~~ I.::..n.,.....\{ .. .~..
'_. t.. ...,.... I l' . \'" ~
~ ....~l~()i.tt, 'g~ ~^;\~T'r / 1~' ~].. ~!
~..a. . . , ,;.(- . I & r:.I ..s . ... .
... . ...~,~".:: \.- .3~'" '. ~ If -= '~J=::"'"
,.,~.is:,:.~:~ ._~.-.;:-.~.-JIIIlf\.:::o~/.~........~..:.~. ~.:,,-..~:..~~.. k . ~'::.'1
2....... ~ . \ -r" . ,. ~: :' ~ o. '.
l-:.: ~:,.., .-... ~~: - I . i. ~ ':'I~j".
~:'.......~.~v:~;..'..~.. i, . I -:.......... .-, ~o
.~.:!. e. "hU'.. ~- -~.., ...~ '," ~3
<.';:.;. .....~"'.. ~...",..t..x=--.\~CQ ~ . ,,~ O:~
~: i :"-/.( ., ~~ ~M~ - I
O;.~)'\ '. - ~.;~ ',~" ~.~
"0 ...;,,;,;.~l;ja./....... \~"~ ~ ...: ~~! '" ."
~. .. "". .... ..~
'. '"" Z - '.-:.". -- ..-
=/ (.. .." ..~,
,...0 ~. .. _ 0- :-
. r...::~~....'-......).~~
. ;jj '<: . .~~.
110""'1. '. ...,:
... .,i
". f'"
... <'J . ....".-,
.... "
. .,.
hi".
:;
p~tt
"
~!
1,'
.: .. /'
: <0' "r .
, .
\_:
TR-14
. -~~.~!U_
,i i i/~. .
. -I: .~. ,((VI! '~,~ .
J,5fJff~, -L~~. 1m !'<"T~:l~) 1..J....III......1
- .;~..,. l 1l~~\J~:::. t- ~- ,; i ~r'!p i
- , I I' \ ...." . " : h! "I J
! ~J I<.j , . \" !', ".
· I \l~~il d'S >" il~~ -~v Lll?J :
i', ./\:J:l~~at ~i~' ;; )A Y 'fZ.LJI I
~,I.~i~~'~'~~IT III~I .
). " \J(tID't\\\Y"111 Il>. . :
i i -\ ;... ~1J I nj. , r
· -',t; "~..! I ..IL , I!
~
~
i:;
I ..,~~."~ I i~ · ::D I
w:"" ' . ;... ~,__, ~
:.Im~ 'm') t ;.. I. l('\f I~(
~ ~ :i~~W~~ "c~~~J<~~ ~ ~~ant FJ~tr1~ ~c1R~.
. ~ I j ~ I . I . IIII'II-:~. \
~;c; iTI .~..;,.;.;; ~~\ :kc~~.. ~j I1I11 ~"" '~\;'b~l\~
~ ~ ~ . - ~'IT\ \\ I .)..[.. n. 'l=--
~y '. t . I / ~ '" -! .'~. I II.
~::: '.~ ''V~I..~~\~ll~,~~~:1.7J~ ,j
= _.~-- 11\01" =,1, ' ......!I..,~I, .
,---- > ~...) ~I <!'
N- ~ ----- lii!ilRl.ll111(' illl 1"lik~L\
'Q,~L~~~Jq~ ~.I..'.~ :-=1T ~Hc,"-l" ~L':"" ~~.. ~
....~...I.~~...) '.. .".~"" \ ~ '/ l1
I .....1~.!,i;..J I'Yil : r. =.;.""I~tL.~ ~.~; U ~J
;! ~.- .'~J.. l..l~.c liiiMii.;. .~. =:::... .Jtl I ~ !; ;:[
\\ .. · .1 , , !JL l: I.' -- n
J) Jr ~.;..~.~.. ~::-::i.._ ..... .... 1...T..l.'..~'-;: " Ii.... II i ~ ~
If! ~ J: '(c : ~ ~ ./' ~
,\\.ih bl" . ~ ,~ . i:>"/- 2 ,
~ '.f7""~"try Clu , Il""" r- ~! if
j ~~r:o:~u "~~----: ~ . ~:!l:
~ 1.\ tiZi. :. . I ~~. \t, ell, .. Q...., n:;.-.. .... ~!~ $... 'I..,w -IN
.~~ ...~ r-::s .III }ij~/~>,IAI ~
~'It.: ~ J_y .~ '~~-'.:"f 1'~. IJ(.. '..""".:' Y,I V)~ ~
J I\.!~' ~1C:>"v~'\ I\~ ' .tI V ~' ~
'. .. ~ ~ IJ. llr., 0 i ~ I ~
., -. If,' , , I
, ~\, .... " . i. I I /,.
J-'-~\\I.~ I.L't.;,llJ.. -- . ~
LL1~tT, ,oo I
1 ~b {~:l\;~'_ \~ -'T-.
~ ' ~ ls ,1ti-Jrri" ill A
I I -:r-,~ y
t II j .,J.'" i t t ~~ 9 .....J
Jjrj i ill 'R.. ~ /7. ; lQ I) l._. ~. "
~;.>.iO ~JK' J - I . [/1 !" ~"",.", II 1_"
l,q,'fl;:;'C' "', '. '. ~ ! ~ ~.'!;~~ _
! :' \ >. , .' 1"'1..-; '/Tf~~"t~d \ ,
. 1 I ,. . I ~ '~ . I" 'VAlid,'" /, '
~ i~. I Slj'JL,.,~.. J.llii' W}'1' fr I ~Jr
~ -- ::/~" '1~! _ !jll~~/ __\1 [L
I - " ,\-" I, . Y '!,,",OJ:!': '~m&~, \\
I \ I r:' .'"" r/ .,~ 'l\~ I ;'~"'~..Jll"'~' \.
~ L \~ '~U.W1.. 'I) f~~~'~iT:"i!il' ~N;\
II~<_. '. I ~~Tt~11 ~r-.~~i1.
~ / / IV. ,/ till. " . k~,,--b . . ~
~; I ptm~t,~~~,~.~~_n~Gi..~ :'
I <:4J;l~) ~. '.) I/~~:' ~~ \11 ",I, ~ I ,J
\ "2>~(I; Y./"r-i · ~ = r' '. ~ Yir "" '~
".. ~J II ,/,,,. : '<J7Tr"~ '-:2.1:\11 ""',-", ~ II "d '
i~ !)~-X. "L:~~.--:; f:::::. ~.., 1h. T rTl.b11 11]\< (~~1\\. c'~ '..." ~~
I .) '. ).UT ~ -~~ ~ 'l'f. . ,-1---- m . I'
' -c;" ; ~n.cit T -m I """. ___ I I
~~ fiiil'i '&L ..... .... ..... r.... .. II ' ! L
Vi GJ~~,........ (..... I
.- "n~f~" iin~\\:"" \_ ~ ; ~
5.!~"i.1D I I
~.~ p. ~ I~
------..
.
~
.-
VI
-
I
I
I
I
b ~ ~
e!. ~ g
.....
~ g
a
rof
~~
I i
~
::s
.....
~
:3
~ ~
~ 0'
~ >
~
[
~!
~
~
~
c::
~
::r
~
(I)
e-
Q..
'<
ll! IIII !!II. ~ I
III ! II ~
I'pnQi !;;
'I';inn ~
'II'!,.
Hl lp
ill. !
~ I! a I
i i
Ip .
-I
--
I
.
I
I
~
~
t:j
r/:J
"'0
o
~
~
~
~
I-' ·
o
t:j
~
~
~
t:j
~
(I)
>
~
o
c::
0'
~
-
I
I I
~)
I ~
~
I 6 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Q)
-
CD
W1
.
Local Streets. The Transportation Plan map does not attempt to show other than existing
local streets. Location of such streets is left to the developer to decide. However, in
reviewing development requests, the City should carefully consider the following
recommendations:
1. In new subdivisions, as opposed to simple resubdivisions, all lots should abut on a
publicly dedicated street. While it is the City's policy to discourage private streets, in
cenain limited cases of lot resubdivision, the City has adopted the policy that. as many
as three lots may be allowed access by private easement, subject to the following
criteria:
a. The land to be subdivided is not capable of being divided into more than three
lots.
b.
c.
d.
e.
. f.
.
Consideration is given to surrounding undeveloped property.
A 50-foot easement and adequate turn-around must be provided.
Legal provisions are made for the use and maintenance of the road.
Where private roads are approved, protective covenants will be required
stating that the City will not take over or maintain them.
The minimum width of the paved surface for private streets shall be 20 feet
where adequate off-street parking is provided. Where the potential exists for
on-street parking the minimum shall be 24 feet.
2. Subdivision circulation patterns should be examined from a broader perspective than just
the individual site. In this regard, consideration must be given to surrounding
undeveloped property as well as existing street patterns to ensure that the most efficient
transportation network is achieved.
3. All streets should meet the minimum design standards established by the City. Existing
. standards such as minimum road width, and length of cul-de-sac streets should be re-
evaluated in terms of safety (emergency vehicles access) and street maintenance
(snowplowing). It is recommended that the minimum right-of-way width for local
streets be maintained at 50 feet and that the maximum length for cul-de-sac streets
should be reduced from 2,000 feet to between 500 and 1,000 feet.
4. In areas where existing streets have substandard right-of-way widths, the City shall
acquire, to the extent possible, additional right-of-way through the subdivision process.
.
5/93
TR-17
The following page illustrates cross-sections of various street designs. For local streets the
following criteria should be used to evaluate appropriate widths:
24-foot street
28-foot street
32-foot street
.
· use in areas where zoning requires lots to be 20, ()()() square feet
in area or larger
· on-street parking restricted to one side
· consider additional parking restrictions for through streets
· use in areas where zoning allows lots smaller than 20, ()()()
square feet in area
· on-street parking restricted to one side
· use in areas where abutting properties are occupied or zoned for
two-family or multiple-family dwellings or on through streets
where on-street bicycle/pedestrian traffic is a factor
· if on-street parking is allowed on both sides of street, consider
separated bicycle/pedestrian facilities
It should be noted that streets currently exist which are less than 24 feet in width. While
substandard streets may be maintained at their current design, in no case shall streets be
reconstructed at a width less than 20 feet. Substandard streets shall be evaluated based on
their use characteristics (i.e. land use intensity, on-street parking, bicycle/pedestrian traffic,
etc.).
.
The City recognizes that it may not be feasible to reconstruct existing streets to the preceding
standards. A study prepared by a Street Reconstruction Financing Task Force, recommends
that existing streets in need of reconstruction may be built to a lesser standard. Specifically,
existing streets may be rebuilt to their existing width (but not less than 20 feet), and curb and
gutter will be installed only where necessary for drainage purposes or where traffic dictates.
Pages TR-20 and TR-21 illustrate typical cross-sections for street reconstruction projects.
In the mid 1980's Shorewood'adopted seasonal weight restrictions in an effort to reduce wear
and tear on City streets. These restrictions, however, were not extended to garbage trucks.
The City currently licenses 12 refuse haulers to operate within the community. Aside from
having to obtain a license, refuse haulers are basically unregulated. Since garbage trucks
have been identified as the single most damaging vehicle to city streets, serious consideration
must be given to establishing regulations which limit the extent of the damage. This topic is
discussed in greater detail in the Community Facilities/Services chapter of this Plan.
The area located west of Grant Lorenz Road, between Edgewood Road and Smithtown Road,
contains much of Shorewood's remaining developable land. The City should prepare concept
circulation plans for the area, to be used as guides in reviewing future development
proposals.
6/93
.
TR-18
.
.
.
_fr
iJ',:'
~W
g;-l~
if:-: r"1;i
;;;;;-,-~
=-- t .J
.
."
\
~.-.
.:(~.
~~t.;r
ll-~
A .tl~
R/W R/W
I' MIN. 60' R/W I
28' F ACE TO FACE
~
I
...---
I
~ \J~ ,~~/
I
.
R/W
R/W
1
MIN. 60' R/W
32' FACE TO FACE
~
I
,~
R/W
R/W
I'
MIN. 60' R/W
36' FACE TO FACE
,{*
I/~
I
ifr.I"
~I
;"J/
~\I~
\8
Cross-Section - Local Streets
TR-19
,-------
'I
I
.;t..
,f~:.
,I
I
I (
~4,." TOPSOil
~ -f)
.
50' R/W .
I
"'4
24'
,
2i.
2X
4-" -TOPSOIL .
\.'
~
.
.
lYz" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
W / ROLLED BIT. CURB
3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" CLASS 5/GRAVEL Cl001- CRUSHED)
BASE COURSE
l' SUBCUT W / SELECT GRANULAR BACKFrLL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
NO SCALE
Typical Section for Street Reconstruction
.
TR-20
.
,.- 50' R/W .I
I I
I. I
24'
.
~4" TOPSOIL 21.
-::-~ ~ { . .
I
\ . I I
t I I
0
,
.
27. . \."4-" TOPSOIL
iil ::
07'
7f"
SUB-DRAIN J
_ 1'12" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" CLASS 5/GRAVEL (100Y. CRUSHED)
BASE COURSE
l' SUBCUT W / SELECT GRANULAR BACKFILL
GEOTEXTILE F A8RIC
NO SCALE
.
Typical Section for Street Reconstruction
(Alternate with Sub-Drain)
TR-21
Collector Streets. Streets in Shorewood which are currently classified as collectors include
Minnetonka Boulevard in the Nonheast corner of the city,. Old Market Road/Covington Road
and the south end of Vine Hill Road in the southeast corner of the city,. Galpin Lake Road
south of Highway 7,. Eureka Road between Smithtown Road and Highway 7,. and Smithtown
Road. In planning for Shorewood's circulation network it is recommended that two
additional routes be classified as collectors: I) Country Club Road/Yellowstone TraillLake
Linden Drive,. and 2) Vine Hill Road nonh of Covington Road.
.
Traffic levels on Country Club/YellowstonelLake Linden greatly exceed those which are
recommended for a local street. While it is not intended to encourage traffic to shoncut
between County Road 19 and Highway 7, it is imponant that the street be designed to safely
carry the existing traffic.
Traffic studies prepared for the development of Shorewood's southeast area suggest that the
collector function for that area be split by Old Market Road and Vine Hill Road, resulting in
two "minor" collectors. To maintain a balance of traffic between the two streets, the
intersection of Covington Road and Vine Hill Road should remain in its current "T"
configuration. If future traffic patterns warrant it consideration should be given to other
intersection designs which would maintain balance of traffic flow.
Although it is recognized that Vine Hill Road may be expensive to upgrade, it should be
incorporated into the City's Municipal State Aid (MSA) system and the City should work with
the City of Minnetonka to upgrade it to a "minor" collector status, that is, a street designed
to function somewhere between a local and collector street designation.
.
,"
---
Cross-sections for various widths of collector streets are shown on the following page. As
with local streets the width should be determined based on the activities which will occur on
the street. For ,Example, a 28-foot street is adequate for moving traffic but does not provide
space for on-street parking or bicycle/pedestrian traffic. Parking must be prohibited and
separate bicycle/pedestrian trails provided along a 28-foot street.
While parking should not be encouraged on collector streets, a 32-foot section can provide
some opportunity for parking on one side. Thirty-two feet is not adequate to provide on-
street bicycle lanes.
Thirty-six feet is the minimum width recommended for on-street bicycle lanes. In such cases
where off-street trails can not be provided it is recommended that bicycle traffic and on-street
parking not be mixed.
Minor Arterials. Arterials provide mobility for longer trips at the expense of accessibility.
Minor arterials complement and support the principal and intermediate arterial system, but
are primarily oriented toward travel within and between adjacent subregions. Local and
collector streets can intersect with minor arterials however, direct property access, should be
limited.
.
6/93
TR-22
1
;~
:Jt~
.
R/W
I
60' R/W
32'FACE TO FACE
q;
I
I
=
t I n9 ~
~} n
o 0
, I.
I
Cross-Section - Collector Streets
TR-23
R/W
I
With the community, there are two roads designated as minor arterials - County Road 19 .
north of Highway 7 and Mill Street (County Road 82) to the south of Highway 7. There are
no current plans by Hennepin County to upgrade any of the county roads in Shorewood.
However, there are two issues which the City of Shorewood should address. The
intersection of County Road 19 and Smithtown, becomes heavily congested at times, due to
the volume of traffic on 19. It is recommended that this intersection be considered for
further study. The City should examine alternative methods of improving this intersection.
This may involve modification of access drives near the intersection and review of Hennepin
County standards to see if the intersection may warrent signalization.
The second issue regarding County Road 19 is direct property access. Over the past several
years the City has begun to limit and confine direct access points as properties are developed
or redeveloped. This policy should be continued and the City should work with Hennepin
County and Tonka Bay to limit the width and number of driveways and to encourage the use
of common driveways wherever possible. ·
Intermediate Arterials. Intermediate arterials connect subregions, carrying higher traffic
volumes, faster speeds, and provide access to major traffic generators. Access to
intermediate arterials should be limited to connections with principal arterials, other
intermediate arterials, minor arterials and selected collectors. Traffic signals on
intermediate arterials should be spaced at greater intervals to facilitiate smooth traffic flow
progressions at higher speeds.
The largest traffic carrier in Shorewood is State Highway 7, which is classified as an .
intermediate arterial. In 1986 Shorewood participated with the Department of
Transportation, the Metropolitan Council and. several communities abutting Highway 7 in the
preparation of the T.H. 7 Corridor Study, dated November, 1986. The study recommends
improvements for the segment of Highway 7 between State Highway 101 to the east and
Minnewashta Parkway to the west.
In brief summary the Corridor Study suggests confining access points in the study area to five
signalized intersections, spaced approximately one mile apart; construction of a grade-
separated interchange at St. Alban's Bay Road/Covington Road; realignment of Galpin Lake
Road to intersect with Water Street (nonsignalized),' and upgrading between T.H. 41 and
Minnewashta Parkway to a five-lane divided roadway with a continuous center left-turn lane.
Along the entire corridor, existing access points will be consolidated to minimize direct
access to the highway.
In adopting the Corridor Study, Shorewood qualified its approval by taking issue with certain
recommendations in the study. Following are the City's positions on various areas of
concern:
.
6/93
TR-24
.
1. Vine Hill Road/Highway 7 Intersection. The City has approved the plan shown on
page TR-26. Construction of the intersection is scheduledfor 1994. The City of
Minnetonka proposes to upgrade the service road between Vine Hill Road and the
Minnetonka Senior High School in conjunction with the intersection construction.
Shorewood will coordinate plans for upgrading the service road between the new
intersection and Vine Hill Road with Minnetonka and MNDOT.
As a result of the intersection improvement certain remnant parcels of land will
remain which are not necessary for the construction. The City should work with
MNDOT to combine these remnants with adjoining sites.
2. St. Alban's Bay Road/Covington Road. The proposed overpass/interchange is
expected to require nearly half of the estimated $10.1 million necessary to fund
improvements for the entire corridor. Shorewood is on record as questioning the cost
versus benefit of this design. The City's position is that the intersections at Old
Market Road and at Vine Hill Road will prove to be adequate to handle future traffic.
.
3. Service Road - Old Market Road to Christmas Lake Road. Construction of this
segment of service road on the south side of Highway 7 would require substantial
cutting of the large hill west of Radisson Entrance and filling the wetland to the east.
Both efforts would require expensive retaining walls. Traffic levels on the north end
of Christmas Lake do not warrant the expense, financially or environmentally.
Reconstruction of the service road between Christmas Lake Road and Radisson Road
should be encouraged. Radisson Road east of the existing service road has been . '
noted as being narrow, winding and potentially hazardous. Proximity of homes to the
roadway makes upgrading of the street very difficult and expensive. Traffic in this
area will continue to be monitored and if volumes warrant it, further consideration
should be given to directional or other regulatory controls.
4. Christmas Lake Road Intersection. Shorewood has approved the intersection
reconstruction plan shown on page TR-27. Since Greenwood objects to the design for
the north side of the intersection, the project has been put on hold at MNDOT.
Transportation engineers are working on additional alternatives which would be
acceptable to Greenwood. Given the hazardous conditions which currently exist at
this intersection, Shorewood should work to expedite a solution to the problem.
.
5. Excelsior West. Page TR-28 illustrates the proposed realignment of Galpin Lake
Road to intersect with Water Street, and the connection of Chaska Road to Galpin
Lake Road. Initially, the City objected to this recommendation due to expense and
impact on residential property. Uponfurther review, the redesign may befeasible,
but expensive. Unless MNDOT will assist in necessary right-ol-way acquisition, the
improvement is considered to be a long range project. In the meantime the City
should study alternatives to the proposed design.
6/93
TR -25
VA~LEY VIEW ROAD I
00<:
U.II~
15 ~
.........
....J
-
r..-..
0.. 0.. ~ ~
g Sl
..
... ::: ... ~d~8
..
~ .. .. 1'~OI/OOZI
'" 0
~ '"
"- ... ...
0 0
0 0 0 M dOOI/'~~ 10001
2 ~ ~
Vl
W
~
:::l
...J
~ I dOS I'SZ 100S ~
du
0: G: I d~Zl /'09 10001 ~
...JlJ..
d~C2
:1:1-
WU)
Zro
>~
TR-26
"-
..
'"
'"
...
o
o
2
...
..
~
...
o
o
..
~ lo i---.
m
w
....
XN
.,:-
~-
12
...J
;<':.
Ii
>
~
o
.-
...
U
= 8
at;;
'1"'"4 ~
~ 0
UU
Q,)'<1"
en 0'\
~ ~
~ ....
=..s
lo-ool
"'0'3
~"3
~]
u
:::::Cf.:l
.-
0::'3
Q,) ~
= ....
.- 8:
><
.
/
(
~
'0
'--'
'-.....J
~
t;~
9?~
.;;:: .'-J
C>
o
.
"
o
o
I
.
.----.-..,
..--
.-
TR-27
I!
~
i=
".
~
1
i
!!
l! ;
:!
z
2
~
u
...
'"
...
<C
U
;;:
~
~;,
...
o
...
'"
o
0..
o
a;
0..
...
.. .
..
~.I
~!: g
It
;,
:.
~
;, ~
;,
!
l'tt
-'
!
31
~
~I
!l
:;1
'"
~,
:;1
8-.:t"
.,. <J.)
~ >
(,) .....
a.>~
en c
~~
s=<:
~E-t
"00
~~
~~
a.>
~ <J.)
~"'O
~ ~
OJ)
cn c::l.
~=::>
513
.~ ~
~ c::l.
..c: 0
UP::
~
.4~
/;/ "
: 1.\
"601. \\
,'~.
., ,
~
North
L~
.fI~.J.2'
c
--- '- '.-.
, oWp
. ..'\~'.)W >
c; .}:f
'", t .
~ . s
TR-28
Galpin Lake Road Intersection
Realignment Per T .R. 7 Corridor Study
6. Trunk Highway 41 Area. Shorewood's plans to upgratle Lake Linden Drive include
closing the right-on, right-off intersection at Highway 7. Design for the nonh half of
the intersection of Highway 41 and Highway 7 should concentrate on good geometries
and the service road between Lake Linden Drive and the intersection should be moved
as far nonh as possible to provide maximum detachment. Private property access to
commercial sites should be consolidated to minimize congestion at the intersection.
7. Lake Minnewashta Area. The intersection of Yellowstone Trail, Seamans Drive and
Highway 7 should be reconstructed as shown on the following page. Right-of-way
must be acquired for this project.
It is recommended that construction of a right-turn lane for the Freeman Park
entrance be given the highest priority for safety reasons. Private property access for
the two homes adjacent to the Freeman Park entrance should be consolidated with the
j
park access.
Streets - Minnesota State Aid System
In 1989, upon reaching a population of 5000, Shorewood became eligible for panicipation in
the Municipal State Aid System. This program contributes approximately $235,000 annually
to the City's street construction fund. Shorewood's allocation for MSAfunds is based on
nine miles of its total 50 miles of streets. Proposed MSA routes are shown on the
Transponation Plan map on page TR-15.
The Transponation Plan coordinates the proposed street classification system with MSA route
designations. For the most pan all collector streets are proposed as MSA routes. Since
there are more MSA miles allocated than there are collector street miles, four local streets
are also designated as MSA routes.
Although the MSA system is primarily afunding resource, there are cenain design
implications, panicularly with respect to local streets. For example, the minimum width
required for an MSAroute is 26 feet. MSA standards also require curb and gutter, whereas
the City's current policy for reconstruction of existing streets requires curb and gutter only
where drainage or traffic necessitate. As MSA streets are planned, their use characteristics
must be examined to ensure that adequate width is provided to accommodate area land uses,
(e.g. need for on-street parking).
It must be realized that only limited mileage can be constructed annually. For example the
current Capital Improvement Program estimates that 1.9 miles of streets can be constructed
in the next five years. Following is a current ranking, by need, for the first 10 segments of
MSA routes to be constructed. These routes total 4.37 miles.
6/93
TR-29
6/93
TR-31
il iC:l I
I
.
I
I
~
~
1lU:
,
y
~ ~dF
-~..-
--
j /0 ~~ ... \ \l ""-_d .. i j / J; II ._ .... /----
/_-
Bicycle/Pedestrliln Trails
r
In 1991 the Park Commission developed a Trail Plan for the City of Shorewood. Trails are
primarily considered as an element of parks and recreation, but due to their interrelationship
with other trans po nation elements, they will also be discussed in the Transponation chapter.
It is recommended that the Trail Plan (shown on the following page) be consulted for all
development proposals and street construction projects. Where trails are designated on or
adjacent to roadways, right-of-way should be required as pan of the subdivision approval
process. Construction of trails on or along roadways should be incorporated into street
improvement planning.
Snowmobiles have been a continued source of controversy in recent years, despite increased
effons to enforce City codes regulating their use. Private property trespass and damage have
been raised as issues relative to snowmobiling. More imponantly the safety and
compatibility of snowmobiles with pedestrian uses and motor vehicles make the use of-
snowmobiles questionable on the trail system and streets, respectively. Consideration should
be given to prohibiting their use on public property within the community.
Airports
There are no existing or proposed airports, search areas or other facilities located in the
Shorewood area. Seaplane and ultra-light operations are, however, allowed on the surface
water of Lake Minnetonka. Seaplane traffic in Shorewood has not been identified as a
problem at the present time. However, as use of Lake Minnetonka increases, the potential
for problems to arise. also increases. This use of the lake should be monitored and at such
time it is determined to be a problem, a regional study on the topic should be conducted to
determine if there is a need for a specialized area of the lake to handle seaplane operations.
This study should be a joint effort between all lake communities and may best be handled by
the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District.
r
./,
6/93
TR-32
.
~
w
w
. ..
j
/' 1 ~ f.? i
\'f/./n i a[g)rtr:r\ ~.....' '. I r(l~ <ft :' ,
-=oJ,' == (~li 'TIlA : I ~~)
... .... '~Jl~E : ~./..-'-r~--'-"--~~~~~;~;;---
"'C-,,~ F..: ~.:..- I ~ i; f:i m
,~. -'_, .:J:aLJ~J\ I I '\ I"
?)~~ ~;"."'"';~ ~~!~.I, : ~.'
)Y . '!:.,- ~ ~, '. 1 ", '~, 'KL-J/
o i= lU:> ; ,l!, ,'1.'~).: '. .'u~
,,, ~.= =--: '.......A" I.. '. [:1:
-... ,~.,v .. ,'" ~
--. ~--. I -~: , 1 ~
I ,,~'..I}L. ~~:I. 'I';' [- ~~-Cn" .. -,:'.' ~! I' : I g e
~ '. .._. - .., 0 . \ ~ I .. i 0 e
~;~J;5" - ~ rt~+ - -- · -==,- 5 r'. ": l ~. : i g :
r :;d:->''''' II' 1'-': o. ......p.."; I · i 0 e
~ o'_lrft~' U_L ~'. i ,,- .0/( .' ·
! ~.\ ~--:':\'~>l.~' C 2<:.:: :~)\~ g ~ ~ ~ ! r: Cl
~ :::J, .~~~, .~' r :~. "L)~~ ~,:~ rn ~ ~ I I ~ ~ i ~
d ' _. ;,:>>~t,'l 'lfK-l" L.~' "_~\l!;;' . ~ ~ ~ --I II --I a ~ il-
=II ~r:~x'~'t\'~~~ r;z.'d"JA"'l' .... t.. <I.' .... Z til = 3_, ~ i n co
~ .; ,~.,"V ~. ~"h~~i::' --'. , 'I - ~~ --I;: ;: II ~ co
\--'-. '.-- ~ :':~~i "" .:;: ~ i i 1\]\......', m.,.~ l ~_, ~
~ I - .. '. ...., , ... ....,," l.. . .>. ~ ~'
~_. \ T' '\'('t'i.\~:. "T~~~:( ,~ I =;' ;:;.~~' ~ ~ ~ --I
it, -I. '.~I . I' fflT1'j' '~I ~ < 8-0:: ~
(I - I.. '-'\J.. ~! ". . 'I I~ v. ! ""0
) ,. . ' to ~=...I ~ ~ 01]
~ Ff.1.~'--- -, ~ T'.~ /,'~:-:.-~~ '..' i sn
'\\ ~ I,: "U 1 [".--.-.\ . I I ~ -;::. a.. gU
~'(7' ,I ,"'II ~ I ---1" ~ :n
~ ~~ ~I ~.~j..~JlI~~
~1.j ,,\~c;:~r '\."~?~" .I!!.~i' .~.~.~.':'.'\_-_.._._. 1~~~ <O~ ~
' d . ""'.l;:''''':.v.~' I t)l .;i
-lr>' p~~"I~f:8 ~ ~ Jr,b: !2>~ ~
J!= I ~y.'-:-.,'.""i~~'~1~ H., ~ Vt i
~L+.-_h1f1..t.'.;.I~~~)~ ;;; ~() ! :~. ~ ~.
_~~\~::, ':~. m'll~]JL~.~:L~l~ ~" :'~ ~
:::-]':0... \~ '. --[1 -. I g .
~-=-~'u1tT ,l~' ci 1~. 0
~1' [~~ ~::--~ ~,~.ii tI
P-.. I '\{:\
\, ...::. I.lo. ..I (ljJ I
~c~~,~K ~ L
II ~"A...r: (', (\~b.~ g ~
'~~ll'-.l,\ I "" '" ~ ~ I
~'--4 - l:. ~ I
,=Tl.A~iU~l] I ~ g:
"'- -- j~~ r '. \~, ~ 0 j
~t r~ . l~T1!rrlt' :\~. , . , . C:=:\~ "---!
\ - i~TL , J r'.~(~ \ \.. t(\ 'i i \) {l l ~OJilQQOOoru:dt ~
\ . . ~. I '\ .._.e /, . \;"~ v- , ~! ~. "Mh!"n~\! '~11_,,-
~~t~ .. ~~.. " ~~.'~ ~~"J~JJFI~~~~~
(( I &1. ".. .\ I ~ tit 'If iJ~, ~;1! ...: A~ ~~I
gi~" .... )J,~ ~ )y ~1' Jl" ' ';'~ ....t\l\
\--..------.....- ~I-~""- ";!-~;~;:~'-.\ c"l'''..../. :. U. [II; /'~T~~'" ~.
\. \; ~I -:. ~[\ 1 Jl L 0:I,1:.~\ ,\ \ .~'-' ~ irTl-- \' "
" 14 m -:~ "'". ," ),.... 'I. II tj"",
o ,,~ ",\" .". ~~'/' ~~~01~a;" ~lllll1~ ~l J
~I r, '. I . l :!.-./;~<:~ ,~iS\~", k~ I 'U1lJ\\\~ II aB
,-" ~ I j{ : -/ _lJ.z .., 0 ~."'~~\\} \~ ~J v~}, ..-..- -
~.-,'.>". . a - Z'-:> ~~! .~ \, ~~ ~ -'I~ '-=I~
"'-i.. ~ 'L......- 'j '\ \:; >;:0 'r.-f "" eh
...."',~ - ~.,\ .~" " 0
.. \ e. I \ o' l
'e W ,~
-- ,.',::J ~ ~\ ~\\.. i 1
~ n )Q ~J::;[j ~ ~1tW1, ~~1t.K~-r1
I'r--
It,'
'1
1
I
I
. "'1
m 111111111 ~
I',HUlii j;;
qJl,1I ~
lu IIi
H' I I
U I i
III ..
.
~~ ~ "'C ""
,.. ~ (JQ "1 \.1
.'f.,. ~ 0 -.
iJ' :l_~
"'_'~ Q.'W
'i.;',: 0
. VI
l'1l 0
c..~
""00
~
_. ::T
- 0
CIl .-s
~ ('D
~ ~
8 0
o
~
~
.-s
~
-.
...
~
...
~
='
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 1993
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
SMITHTOWN ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Rosenberger called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. Nielsen conducted a tour
of the Public Works facilities for those present prior to the meeting.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Rosenberger; Commissioners Bean, Bonach, Borken, Malam and
Pisula; Commissioner Hansen entered the meeting at 7:35 p.m. after
attending a portion of the Park Commission meeting; Council Liaison
Lewis; and Planning Director Nielsen.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Bean moved, Borkon seconded to approve the minutes of the Commission's June
1, 1993 meeting.
Motion passed 6/0.
1. STUDY SESSION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Chair Rosenberger emphasized that this final review of the Transportation Plan will result
in a document representing the Commission's recommendation of a Transportation Plan
to the City Council for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Nielsen stated that the final Transportation Plan Chapter prepared for presentation to the
Council at the June 14 joint meeting will incorporate the issues and policies; goals and
objectives; and graphics.
Nielsen reviewed the Sections: Streets - Minnesota State Aid System; Mass Transit;
Bicycle/Pedestrian Trails; and Airports of the Transportation Plan as presented with his
memorandum of June 7, 1993.
The Commissioners discussed each Section as presented and provided clarifications and
policy direction.
Commissioner Hansen reviewed the results of a meeting he attended on June 8 with
Administrator Hurm and the Community Relations Coordinator and a Planner from the
Rapid Transit Board (RTB). He stated the City and the RTB will work jointly to appeal
Shorewood's apparent inequitable tax level. In addition, with a view to possible
1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Tuesday, June 8, 1993 - Page 2
expansion of service, the RTB will design a transit survey for the City's distribution and
compile the results and will also prepare an article for the City's newsletter and for local
newspapers describing the current local bus service.
Hansen briefly reported on the Park Commission's discussion regarding snowmobiling.
Nielsen reviewed the Commission's requested changes as incorporated into the
Transportation Plan.
Borkon moved, Malam seconded to adopt the Transportation Plan Chapter, with the
changes made, including the policies, issues, goals and objectives, for presentation
to the City Council for its approval at the joint meeting on June 14, 1993.
Motion passed 7/0.
2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR - None.
3. REPORTS - None.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Hansen moved, Pisula seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
Motion passed 7/0.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
Arlene H. Bergfalk
Recording Secretary
TimeSavers Off Site Secretarial
2
.
,
.
DRAFT
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PARK COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Dzurak called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present:
.
Chairman Dzurak, Commissioners Andrus, Bensman, Laberee,
Lindstrom, Mc Carty, and Wilson (joined the Commission at 8,:30 at
Park Elementry School in Chanhassen); Administrator Hurm;
Council Liaison Benson; Park Planner Chamberlain and Park
Secretary Niccum
Absent:
Commissioner Fuller
REVIEW AGENDA
The Commission approved the agenda as it stands.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Laberee moved, McCarty seconded, to approve the minutes of Tuesday, June 8, 1993, as
corrected. Motion carried - 6/0.
REPORT BY G. LINDSTROM AND J. HURM ON A PROPOSAL FOR FREEMAN
PARK MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT
Administrator Hurm explained the proposed "Freeman Park Foundation". He said it is time
to face facts, the City does not have enough resources to make planned Freeman Park
improvements. This "Freeman Park Foundation" would substitute for the municipality
pouring tax dollars into the planned improvements. He said he feels the plan has real
potential. It will get organized sports groups involved in working together.
He said it's what you call "creative financing".
..
<:;
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 22,1993 - Page two
lindstrom said that approximately 2,800 people are involved in using the various fields at
Freeman Park at this time. He said he is in favor of the plan, he feels it is a way to make
improvements.
Hurm said he has talked with the Tonka United Soccer Association. They said they
discussed having a fundraiser, saying they hoped by doing so they could raise at least $5,000
toward playground equipment this year. Their executive board will meet next week, and the
fundraiser will be discussed at that time. The Adult Softball organization has been donating
over the last several years.
The Commission, Council liaison Benson, and staff discussed the idea at length.
.
Following are some .of the issues discussed:
. Concession stands - should the City expect or request a percentage of the profit?
"The profits would go to a good cause."
"Concession stands in City parks should be audited by the City because they
are responsible for the parks."
. Freeman Park Foundation or Shorewood Foundation? - would tqe name affect the
results?
. Freeman Park only? Or all parks in Shorewood? - should the donations be used only
for Freeman, or should they be used for all parks?
"If the donations go to Freeman, then there will be more money available for
the other parks."
"I would like to see citizen involvement in all parks."
"Organizations that play at Freeman might not want their donations gong to
other parks."
. We've needed something like this for a long time - All present generally agreed with
this statement.
. User fees vs. donations - Which would be most beneficial? Which would raise the
most revenue?
~
.
.
CI'IY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 - Page three
. What happens down the line if the funds are locked into Freeman. and all the
improvements have been made?
One of the ideas of this plan is to get the organizations to do the
maintenance, funds will be needed for maintenance and replacement forever,
we would not receive enough in funding to have that kind of an excess.
However, provisions could be made to make improvements in other parks.
. Control
In Minnepolis, and other areas, organizations like this can become very
powerful, the way it reads now, the Park CommissiolI could be outvoted by
organizations. '
"It also says that the Park Commission and the City Council, must
approve all changes and improvements to Freeman Park."
liThe Council should have the power use a disbandment clause if the
Foundation gets out of control."
Certain control mechanisms can be put in place to avoid this type of
situation, such as maintenance standards, City controlled scheduling,
arrangements to handle mediation of problems, bylaws, etc..
"The majority of control should remain with the City. II
. Are there any other Foundations like this in existence?
"The DNR has an organization that works with them."
Basically, the Commission felt Hurm and Lindstrom had done a very good job, and
complemented them. They liked the philosophy of getting people involved, having sports
groups talk to each other and work together, and citizen involvement.
Each Commissioner and staff will study it and make a list of any possible ideas. They asked
Administrator Hurm to present it to the Council to see how the Council likes it. They
would like feedback from the Council, and have it returned to the Park Commission if the
Council feels it is workable.
~
<
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 - Page four
CONSIDERATION OF A PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON THE
PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF PLAYGROUND EOUIPMENT AT FREEMAN
PARK - PLAYGROUND EOUIPMENT COMMl'lTEE
Commissioner McCarty presented two proposals, one from "Iron Mountain Forge" and one
from "Landscape Structures Inc..
8:20 PM....THE COMMISSION LEFT CITY HALL TO GO TO PARK ELEMENTRY
SCHOOL IN CHANHASSEN TO STUDY PLAYGROUND EOUIPMENT FIRSTHAND.
Chairman Dzurak left the meeting at this time.
.
FINAL ADJOURNMENT
Benson moved, seconded by Wilson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 PM. Motion carried
unanimously.
r
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Susan A. Niccum, Park Secretary (City Hall portion)
James C. Hurm, City Administrator (Park visit)