101193 CC Reg AgP
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1993
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 PM
Following the adj ournment of the regular meeting, the
council will convene to Work Session format. No action
will be taken at this time.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call Benson
Mayor Brancel
Stover
Daugherty
Lewis
C. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - september 27, 1993
(Att.-#2 Minutes)
3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to approve items on Consent
Agenda & adopt resolutions therein:
A - A Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat of
Ridge Road Addition (Att.-#3A Proposed Resolution)
B - A Resolution Approving a Setback Variance
Applicant: Ernest pavlisich
Location: 27470 pine Bend
(Att.-#3B Proposed Resolution)
C - A Resolut~ e~ Approving a Simple Subdivision
Appljr ~~o~ Shirley Frantz
Loco. ~o'O""ll: 4815 Suburban Drive
(Att.-#3C proposed Resolution)
D - A Resolution Accepting cooperative Project No.
93-1, Bituminous Sealcoating of streets (Att.-#3D
Proposed Resolution)
E - A Resolution setting a Public Hearing for
Special Assessments of Improvements for Season's
P.U.D. (Att.-#3E Proposed Resolution)
F - A Resolution setting a Public Hearing for
special Assessments for Extension of Sewer to 25840
Highway 7 (Osha property) (Att.-#3F Proposed
Resolution)
G - A Resolution Authorizing Sale of GO Improvement
Bonds (Season's Improvements) and Refunding Bonds
(Att.-#3G Proposed Resolution)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 11, 1993
Page 2 of 2
4. PARK - Report by Representative
A Motion to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter
8.02 Regarding Snowmobiles (Att. -#4 Proposed
Ordinance)
5. PLANNING - Report by Representative
A Motion tre~ 8pt an Amendment to the Flood Plain
Ordinanr .c;,<o~
\~o~-#5A Proposed Ordinance)
6. APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (Att. -#6 Proposed
Resolution)
7 . TRAFFIC REPORTS
A Beverly DrivejCajed Lane (Att.-#7A1
Engineer'sjPlanner's Report; #7A2 Police Report)
B - Excelsior Boulevard (Att.-#7A2 Police Report)
8 . DISCUSSION ON POLICY MATTERS
1994 Budget Issues
9. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
10. ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS -
Review of 1993 Objectives
11. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS - MWCC Task Force Report
12. ADJOURN TO WORK SESSION FORMAT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF
CLAIMS - (Attachment)
..
WORK SESSION
1. REVIEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROGRAM - 1.994-1.998
2 . DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSAL FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OF
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
3. ADJOURNMENT
** INDICATES TAX INCREASE OR FEE IMPLICATIONS
'<
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1993
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 PM
WORK SESSION AGENDA
No action will be taken at the work session and the regular city
council meeting will follow.
1. INTERVIEW CANDIDATES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION
A - 7:00 p.m. - Jeff Foust
B - 7:10 p.m. - Laura Turgeon
c - 7:20 p.m. - Daniel J. Waibel
2 . ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING AT 7: 3 0 P. M .
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 11, 1993
/i :)
/ \ )'
lit
~\J
October 6, 1993
Agenda Item #3A - This resolution approves the preliminary plat for
Ridge Road Addition at the south end of Ridge Road on Silver Lake.
Council asked that this resolution be prepared at its last meeting.
Aqenda Item #3B This resolution includes findings of fact
approves a setback variance for 27470 pine Bend. Council asked that
this resolution be prepared at its last meeting.
Aqenda Item #3C - This item has been postponed.
.......'
'. '
Aqenda Item #3D - This resolution closes the joint sealcoat project
that we undertook with the City of Tonka Bay this summer.
Aqenda Item #3E - This resolution sets the hearing for special
assessments of improvements of Season's P.D.D. for the November 8,
1993 at 7:30 p.m.
Aqenda Item #3F - This resolution sets the public hearing for
special assessments for the extension of sewer to the Osha property
near Freeman Park. This hearing is set for November 8, 1993 at 7:35
p.m.
Aqenda Item #3G This resolution authorizes the sale of
improvement bonds for Season's development and authorizes refunding
of bonds. This refunding and the estimated savings are explained in
a memorandum from Springsted which is enclosed.
';>0'-
Aqenda Item #5 - As a result of the joint City Council/Planning
Commission meeting held last summer and a special committee of the
Park Commission which included the president of the local
snowmobile club and Chief Young, the Park Commission is
recommending the enclosed ordinance for Council consideration. This
ordinance prohibits the use of snowmobiles within the boundaries of
the City of Shorewood between the hours of 11: 00 p.m. and 7: 00 a.m.
.'.
~ ~_s. ;, ;
Aqenda Item #6 - This item is again being postponed because the
Planning Commission tabled action at their last meeting.
Aqenda Item #7 - The enclosed resolution would make appointments to
openings created by the resignations of Planning Commission members
Bonach and Hansen. Because Bonach's term is up in one year and
Hansen's in two years, the Council will need to be specific as to
who is appointed to which term. Interviews will take place at 7:00,
7:10 and 7:20 p.m. See the separate packet of resumes.
Aqenda Item #8 - Enclosed in the packet is a report by the Police
Department on their traffic study on Beverly /Cajed Lane and
Excelsior Boulevard.
Executive summary
October 11, 1993 council Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Aqenda Item #11 - This check list shows any change in status of the
objectives established in the 1993 budget document. This is simply
a status report. If there are any questions, please contact us
prior to the meeting.
Aqenda Item #12 - There should be general discussion as to the
direction the City should take in its dealings with MWCC Task Force
members. Enclosed is material that was presented to city
representatives at the last Task Force meeting.
Work session Aqenda:
.,
Enclosed in the work session packet is a copy of the proposed 1994
to 1998 Capital Improvement Program, which has been reviewed and
recommended by both the Park Commission and Planning Commission. ~
Also enclosed is a report by the Mound Fire Department on the
request from Island residents of three dry fire hydrants. That
issue should be discussed and some direction given in terms of
capital improvement programming.
Also to be discussed at this work session are options to our
current method of collecting residential garbage (some survey data
and statistical information is enclosed in the packet for your
review) ; and a special assessment ordinance for street
reconstruction. The Council had asked that this issue be placed on
the CIP work session agenda. Staff will need direction.
.
.
.
DATE
October 11
October 25
November 8
November 30
JCH/tln
(work.ses)
~
s~ptember 16, 1993
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSIONS
Held in Round Table Format Following the
Regular City council Meetings
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION
Capital Improvement Plan - 1994-1998
from 8/9) i Water Policy Questions
Developments (moved from 8/9)
(moved
New
Review Garbage Collection Alternatives (moved
from 7/12 and 8/9)
Discussion on Street Assessment Policy
Capital Improvement Plan - 1994-1998
*Joint Meeting with Planning
community Facilities section
(moved from 9/13 & 9/27)
commission
of Comp Plan
Discuss Labor Negotiations (moved from 7/26
and 10/11)
*Joint Meeting with Planning commission - Land
Use/Natural Resources (comp Plan)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mayor and city council Members
~.;)li
n
I)
James c. Hurm, City Administrator
October 6, 1993
1994 Appointments
Following is a list of positions that Council will need to make
appointments to for the year 1994. This is presented only for your
information and consideration at this time. Appointments will be
officially made in December of this year.
Acting Mayor:
council Representatives to:
a.
. b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
Park Commission:
Planning Commission Liaison:
Liquor stores:
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District:
Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission:
Regional Transit Board:
Association of Metro Municipalities:
Minnetonka Community Services:
Senior Housing and Services Task Force:
.Coordinating Committee South Lake Minnetonka Public
Safety Department:
LMCD Alternative (Council Liaison):
Representatives to Affiliated Organizations:
.
a. Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission:
b. South Lake Senior Center Task Force:
c. West Hennepin Human ServicE~s Planning Board:
City Attorney:
ci ty Prosl9cutor:
City Engineer:
civil Defense Director:
Official Depositories:
Official Newspaper:
Weed Inspl9ctor:
Assistant Weed Inspector:
Appointments - Cont.
Oc~ober 6, 1993
Page 2 of 2
Planning Commission:
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
The following Planning Commission members' terms expire as of
December 1, 1993:
Robert Bean
Kirk Rosenberger
Park Commission:
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
.
The following Park Commission members' terms expire as of December
1, 1993:
Gordon Lindstrom
Jim Andrus
Per Resolution #75-92 the Southshore Senior Center Task Force was
to remain in effect until October 1, 1993. The Task Force is
expected to request a one year extension.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,1993
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB .ROAD
7:00 p.m.
.MINUTES
1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Brancel at 7:00 p.m.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Brancel; Councilmembers Benson, Daugherty, Lewis, and Stover;
Administrator Hurm, Engineer Dresel, Attorney Keane, Planning Director
Nielsen, and Financial Director Rolek.
.
C. Review Agenda
Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to remove Agenda Items 3.D. and 3.E. from the Consent
Agenda, place them on the Regular Agenda, and to approve the Agenda for September 27,
1993, as amended.
Motion passed 5/0.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes/Executive Session Minutes -
September 13, 1993.
. Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the City Council Minutes and Executive
Session Minutes of September 13, 1993.
Motion passed 4/1. Brancel abstained.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Brancel read the Consent Agenda for September 27, 1993.
Lewis moved, Stover seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and to adopt the Resolutions
and Motions contained therein:
A. RESOLUTION NO. 93-83 "A Resolution Approving A Lot Width Variance
and a Setback Variance for Lance DeTrude."
1
2
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 2
~
B. RESOLUTION NO. 93-84 "A Resolution Approving A Development Stage
Plan and Preliminary Plat for Gideon's Woods P.U.D."
C. "A Motion Authorizing Installation of a Street Light - Deer Ridge."
D. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat for the Season's P.U.D. - Moved to
Re~lar A2enda.
E. A Resolution Accepting Bids for Utilities and Awarding Contract for
Construction for the Season's P.U.D. - Moved to Re2ular A2enda.
F. Motion to Approve an Extension to Recording Secretarial Service Agreement.
G.
Motion to Change the Regular Council Meeting scheduled for November 22,
1993 to Tuesday, November 30, 1993 and to Cancel the Regular Council
Meeting scheduled for December 27, 1993.
.
H. Motion to Approve an Agreement by and Between City of Shorewood and
Robert C. and Margaret J. Osha Relating to Land Dedication and Sewer
Installation.
I. Motion to Approve Granting Extension of Time. Appellant: Dick D.
Mahaffey. Location: 6020 Chestnut Court.
Motion passed 5/0.
3.D. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE SEASON'S P.U.D.
Mr. Larry Buesgens, 20090 Excelsior Boulevard, who lives immediately north of the Season's
project, expressed concern regarding a storm sewer collection point in the northeast corner .
of the development that appears to be a deviation from the historical handling of storm
water that normally allowed flow to the designated wetlands on the property. Buesgens
explained that bringing the storm sewer immediately into the culvert drainage system
presents an environmental problem for Footprint Lake because a filtering system does not
exist. He requested that the water be diverted directly into the wetlands on the property
to provide a filtering system for the lake. Buesgens described his concern related to the
proposed re-lining of the culvert beneath the road and inquired what the contingency plan
is in the event the liner can not be replaced. He stated it appears the access road from the
north half of the project has been relocated 40-50 feet west from its original location
affecting his and a neighbor's property. He pointed out that City ordinance allows 3 pets
per household and expressed concern regarding the possible 36 pets that may be allowed
for the 12 Season's residents that access Excelsior Boulevard. Buesgens stated the wetland
has not been properly barricaded during construction. He stated repair of previous erosion
damage has not been addressed in the proposed drainage improvement project. While some
rip-rap will be provided near the culvert area, Buesgens stated it will not re-store damage
2
.
.'
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 3
or prevent future damage, and it does not it include consideration of erosion occurring in
the channel access to the lake. AJthough a substantial amount of rip-rap may be required
to accomplish that, Buesgens stated it is necessary that the responsible parties address the
problems involving his property. He pointed out the proposal does not address restoration
of the wash(~d out area in the surrounding area above the culvert.
Buesgens expressed his appreciation for the speed study conducted on Excelsior Boulevard
and anticipated that improvements will result.
Dresel responded to Buesgens concerns. He acknowledged that a small portion
(approximately 1 acre) of the northwest corner of the site drains into a storm sewer catch
basin instead of draining to the wetland. However, he stated the Watershed District
approved the proposed drainage plans and indicated it is common to allow small areas of
direct run-off. While the District did not believe strongly that any action should be taken
in the area, it indicated support for any desired changes. Dresel recommended no further
action be taken because the cost would exceed the benefit and the existing conditions do
not measurably impact water quality. Complete replacement of the pipe that is to be re-
lined would cost approximately S25,OOO according to Dresel. Re-lining of the pipe will
essentially produce a "new" pipe. However, Dresel stated that if the pipe is collapsed and
cannot be re-lined successfully, installation of a new pipe would be required as a capital
improvement project and have to be done at a later date. Regarding alignment of the new
road, Dresel stated its Iocation is essentially within 5' of where it was proposed in the
concept stage plan. The developer has been requested to make a right angle in the road
for safety reasons. Dresel acknowledged that collapse of the old pipeline allowed substantial
erosion; however the developer has cut a new channel, hay bales have been placed in the
outlet to Footprint Lake, and a silt fence will be erected to control erosion from the
property. Pete Boyer, the developer of the property, described the water containment
program during the early construction stage, noting that drainage is improved from original
conditions.
Lewis inquired about the effect on downstream erosion. Dresel explained that riprap will
be used to control erosion in the area surrounding the outlet pipe however cost precludes
extension of riprap the entire length to the lake. He stated that a review of a 1967
topography map shows liale change has occurred downstream due to erosion since that time.
Benson moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 93-85 "A Resolution
Approving th.e Final Plan and Final Plat of the Seasons P.U.D."
Motion passed 5/0.
3.E. A RJESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR UTILITIES AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SEASON'S P.U.D.
3
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 4
~
Dresel stated that bids for local improvements related to the Season's development including
re-lining of the pipe came in at $217,000. Dresel suggested that any funds remaining in the
contingency fund at the conclusion of the project be used to further extend riprap.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 93-86 "A Resolution Accepting
Bid from Widmer, Incorporated in the Amount of $217,025.40 for The Seasons Elderly
Housing Project - City Project 93-2, S.P. 2706-187 (TH = 012)."
Motion passed 5/0.
4. VISITOR'S PRESENTATION
Mr. Jim Daniels, Administrator of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications
Commission, reviewed the commission's work related to Congressional action regarding
cable rate regulation, implementation of improved customer service standards, and noted
that currently council meetings of 5 local cities are broadcast on the Government Access
Channel. He presented the Commission's 1994 Budget and requested Council approval.
He explained that to accommodate the coverage of council meetings of 2 additional cities,
the budget includes funds to purchase additional access equipment and for development.
.
Lewis inquired whether health insurance for employees of the Commission is 100% covered.
Daniels stated employees are all covered up to a certain dollar amount and premiums for
additional coverage over that limit are paid by the employees.
Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the 1994 Lake Minnetonka Cable
Communications Commission Budget as presented.
Motion passed 5/0.
5.
PUBLIC HEARING - 7:30 P.M.
,e
A. Proposed Assessment of Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Charges, Storm
Water Management, City Clean Up Charges and Property Clean Up Charges.
Mayor Brancel opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:35 p.m. there being no comments
from the Public.
B. Motion Adopting a Resolution Approving the Assessment for Delinquent
Sewer and Water Utility Charges, Storm Water Management, City Clean Up
Charges and Property Clean Up Charges, and Motion to Approve the
Assessment Rolls for Such.
Stover moved, Lewis seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 93-87 "A Resolution Directing
Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Charges, City Clean-Up Charges and Property Clean-
4
r
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 5
Up Charges be placed on the 1994 Property Tax Rolls" and a motion to approve the
assessment rolls for such..
Motion passed 5/0.
6. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:45 P.M. - REZONING R-1A TO P.U.D. - MEADOW WOOD
COMMUNITY (Sl8:NIOR HOUSING PROJECT)
Applicant:
Location:
Jud Knoll (d.b.a. Diversified Housing)
25400 State Highway 7
Mayor Brancel requested that those wishing to speak sign up to do so, stated each individual
will be limited to 3 minutes, and explained the procedure for a public hearing.
.
Mr. Vern Knoll, Tonka Bay, representing Jud Knoll, summarized the request to rezone 7
acres of property located on the north side of Highway 7 between Eureka Road and
Seamans Drive from R-1A, Single-Family Residential to P.U.D., Planned Unit Development
District to allow construction of 44 senior housing units on the property consisting of 1, 2,
and 3 bedroom units, in dusters of 4, to be known as Meadow Wood Community.
Mayor Brancel opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m.
.
Steve Frazier, 6125 Seamans Drive" representing the Shorewood I Homeowners Association,
stated it concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny approval of the
rezoning and concept plan. He stated this site is not acceptable because the density is too
high, it does not meet the needs of seniors, wetlands and drainage issues, water supply
questions, traffic and safety issues and it adversely affects the residential nature of R-IA
zoning. He stated rezoning and concept stage consideration were two separate issues. The
Association concurs with the Planning Commission that Shorewood commit to senior
housing and develop criteria to ensure quality housing for seniors. He stated the City must
support its Comprehensive Plan to keep Shorewood as a semi-rural residential community.
Jim Thomson, 6100 Seamans Drive, presented photographs of the wetlands on the proposed
site and explained that the plans do not meet the requirements and provisions of the
Wetlands Conservation Act and would have an adverse impact on adjacent properties.
Bernadette Thomson, 6100 Seamans Drive, cited various City ordinances relative to the
proposed development and described procedures and policies required by the City to
consider the P.U.D. and proposed project. The neighborhood considers the proposed
development incompatible with the surrounding residential area,
Larry Buesgens, 20090 Excelsior Boulevard, described concerns relating to protection of the
wetlands, drainage, number of pets allowed, enforcement of residents' age limits in the
project, and hours of construction.
5
~
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 6
~
Bob Gagne, 24850 Arnlee Road, stated there is not a "right" location for senior housing in
Shorewood. He reviewed survey results noting that 54% of those surveyed preferred living
in the type of area of the proposed development (semi-rural) rather than in a
commercial/retail area while 38% preferred the urban setting. Speaking on behalf of
mobile and active senior residents of the City, Gagne stated residents who have paid taxes
for many years, possess the right to have step-down cottage type housing available in their
community. Regarding the proposed zoning, Gagne indicated the Comprehensive Plan is
a "living" document designed to be modified as the City changes. He noted the Senior
Citizen Task Force did not identify a specific site for senior housing because doing so could
result in inflated value and price of the property.
Karen Coune, 5935 Seamans Drive, stated the site does not meet the preferences or needs
of the seniors as it is not close to services or to trails and parks.
Cory Nelson, 5980 Seamans Drive, representing the Shorewood Homeowners Association, .
cited traffic data related to the proposed project, and requested that his written report be
made a part of the record. He stated the site is not compatible with the senior task force
survey, the comprehensive traffic plan, the current zoning ordinances, or residents' need for
safety and security. He noted, however, the neighborhood residents support the need for
senior housing in Shorewood.
Frank Kelly, 25000 Yellowstone Trail, stated his property is located 1000' from the proposed
site. He indicated the zoning ordinances and policies of the City are firm, should not be
ignored in considering this concept plan and amendments to those policies should be
considered in hearings separate from this proposal. Since this proposal does not comply
with the City's policies and Comprehensive Plan, Kelly stated it must be denied.
Bill Hardenbergh, 5960 Seamans Drive, a member of the Shorewood I Homeowners
Association, reviewed concerns related to the developer's credentials which demonstrate a
lack of attention to detail and business practices. He questioned the developer's rate of .
profit, identity of the actual developer, and the City's role in regulation of operations of the
development. He stated the Council must not abdicate its responsibilities to its residents and
urged denial of the project.
Sandy Pesheck, 6060 Seamans Drive, described other step-down housing available in the
Twin Cities area and compared those locations with the proposed Shorewood site. She
asked that the City's commitment to a senior housing site be sensible and similar to others
that are located close to services and amenities.
Bob Reutiman, 5915 Galpin Lake Road, reviewed the City's historical inaction on
commitments to senior housing and stated the "right" location has yet to be identified and
opposition will emerge for any site, various kinds of senior housing should be considered,
and indicated no one other than this developer has come forth with a proposal.
6
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTKMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 7
~
Keith Monjak, 6140 Pleasant Avenue, reiterated concerns previously stated and indicated
access to amenities and services is important, and expressed concern regarding excessive
exterior lighting. He indicated that perhaps the "right" site does not exist in Shorewood and
it may be necessary to combine resources with surrounding communities to develop
appropriate senior housing.
Randall Stanek, 6140 Pleasant Avenue, stated he does not support this location, but
supported an active role for the Council to select a site and work with a developer.
George Greenfield, 16860 Patricia Lane, Minnetonka, supported the concerns previously
expressed.
.
John Boyer, 16601 Meadowbrook Lane, Minnetonka, representing Joe Boyer, stated they
own the property south and east of the site near Lake Minnewashta. He indicated their
future plans for the property do not entail dealing with significant water transfer from other
areas to the Boyer property.
Bob Picha, 5930 Seamans Drive, stated there appears to be little input from senior residents
and a lack of coordinated planning for senior housing.
Mayor Brancel closed the Public Hearing at 8:55 p.m.
Brancel called for discussion from the staff and Councilmembers.
Daugherty stated his support for senior housing in the community and efforts to pursue a
proper site. He stated the proposed site is not the best location for the reasons expressed
by the residents, particularly since it would alter the residential nature of the neighborhood.
He indicated expansion and acquisition of property for Freeman Park could be a potential
site for a senior development.
.
Stover expressed strong support for senior step-down housing. She inquired whether a
second hearing is required to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Keane
clarified that before the Council may take affirmative action on the current proposal, the
Comprehensive Plan amendment should be considered in a public hearing before the
Planning Commission and considered for action by the Council. Appropriate action at this
meeting is to deny the proposal or to table action pending consideration of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment. Stover supported tabling of the matter until the necessary
hearings are held and other considerations are adequately addressed.
The meeting recessed at 9 p.m. and reconvened at 9: 10 p.m.
Mr.. Vern Knoll, Tonka Bay, representing Jud Knoll, supported the concept and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, pledged Knoll's cooperation, and stated he
was confident of the adequacy of the site selected for development by Diversified Housing,
Inc. He reviewed the site selection process and the programs and guidelines of Section 42
7
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 8
of the Department of Revenue and Minnesota Housing Authority under which programs the
Meadow Wood Community would be developed. He pointed out that any site in Shorewood
available for senior housing is in a residential housing zone. He explained the requirements
of the equity owners of the proposed development. Knoll defended the site selected and the
design and quality of affordable housing for Shorewood seniors and brought attention to the
documentation addressing property values, traffic and wetland issues compiled by
professional consultants. He stated the focus should be on the needs of long-time
Shorewood residents in a compassionate manner.
The Council continued its discussion of the proposal. Stover stated that because the
Planning Commission's unanimous recommendation called for a thorough study of locations
for affordable senior, a 90-day tabling of the matter would be appropriate to provide
adequate time for necessary consideration, hearings and actions.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to table for 90 days consideration of the rezoning for the .
Meadow Wood Community.
Motion failed 2/3. Lewis, Daugherty and Brancel voted nay.
Lewis stated that while he did not object to tabling of the matter, additional direction from
the Council and staff involvement should be included to address specific City involvement
including density and financing. He acknowledged the problems related to the acceptability
of the proposed site including realignment of the intersection and density. Lewis indicated
it was his impression that the neighborhood may accept a somewhat smaller development
at the proposed site. He acknowledged that an acceptable site in Shorewood may not be
found, but suggested that City financial assistance may interest additional developers.
Stover indicated some uncertainty regarding City financial support but reiterated that it is
vital that the appropriate steps be followed prior to Council action on senior housing.
Brancel stated the public does not appear to support the proposed site and indicated the .
Council should take action on the proposal before it. Daugherty agreed that a 90-day delay
on this proposal is not appropriate. Stover referred to the criteria suggested by the Planning
Commission to be used for site selection. Lewis stated it is essential that the City's
commitment to senior housing be demonstrated.
Benson cautioned against denial of this site based solely on public influence. Keane stated
that the developer may reapply for rezoning after 6 months. Stover supported
reconsideration of the proposal after 90 days and pointed out this developer's proposal is
the only one before the Council for this type of senior housing. Daugherty and Brancel
supported action on the proposal and supported subsequent study of the senior housing
issue.
Daugherty moved, Brancel seconded to deny approval of the concept plan application of
Jud Knoll, (d.b.a. Diversified Housing), for Meadow Wood Community, a planned unit
development for senior housing, at 25400 State Highway 7.
8
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27,1993.. PAGE 9
Motion passed 3/2. Benson and Stover voted nay.
Stover moved, Lewis seconded to direct the Planning Commission with active participation
of the Planning Director, full support of all the staff, and the Senior Housing Task Force
to develop senior housing site criteria in Shorewood, evaluate sites, and investigate and
develop alternatives and methods by which the City may provide financial assistance, and
present the conclusions to the Council in January 1994.
Motion passed 5/0.
Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded to direct the staff to prepare a findings of fact resolution
to deny the rezoning of property at 25400 State Highway 7, from R-1A to P.U.D. requested
by Jud Knoll (d.b.a.Div(~rsified Housing) in connection with the proposed Meadow Wood
Community senior housing development.
.
Motion passed 3/2. Stover and Benson voted nay.
The meeting recessed at 9:55 p.m. and reconvened at 10:00 p.m.
7. .p ARIK - Report by Representative
Hurm reported that installation of playground equipment at Manor Park has been
completed and partially completed at Freeman Park. It is anticipated that remaining work
will be finished this fall.
8. PLANNING - Report by Representative
.
Doug Malam, Planning Commissioner" reported on the Commission's discussions at it's study
session/meeting on September 21, 1993 and read the Commission's resolution
recommending actions to be taken concerning senior housing in Shorewood. (This report
was ma<k..Qrior to consideration of Agenda Item 6.).
A. Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat -
Ridge Road Addition
Robert Engstrom Company
South end of Ridge Road on Silver Lake
Applicant:
Location:
Daugherty referred to the letter received from the Ridge Road Association regarding the
Planning Commission's suggestion that the Applicant and the Association negotiate an
agreement for compensation for repairs of possible road damage caused by construction
traffic and noted that an agreement has not yet been reached. Stover stated the City has
neither responsibility nor authority relative to Ridge Road since it is a privately-owned road.
Lewis explained it is the responsibility of the Association to organize itself to resolve the
issue. Stover noted the Ridge Road development is not covered by formal covenants.
9
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 10
Daugherty requested that the legal requirements regarding this matter be determined and
clarified prior to consideration and approval of the final plat.
Benson moved, Stover seconded to direct the staff to prepare a findings of fact resolution
to approve a preliminary plat for the Ridge Road Addition, subject to the staff
recommendations.
Motion passed 5/0.
B. Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare a Findings of Fact for Setback Variance
Applicant:
Location:
Ernest Pavlisich
27470 Pine Bend
Nielsen stated that on September 24, the Applicant requested that consideration be given
to allow a 2' extension of the garage length.
.
Stover moved, Lewis seconded to direct the staff to prepare a findings of fact resolution to
approve a setback variance for 27470 Pine Bend and to approve extension of the garage by
2'.
Motion passed 5/0.
C. Motion to Direct Staff to Prepare a Resolution Approving a Simple
Subdivision
Applicant:
Location:
Shirley Frantz
4815 Suburban Drive
Stover moved, Lewis seconded to direct the staff to prepare a findings of fact resolution .
approving a simple subdivision at 4815 Suburban Drive.
Motion passed 5/0.
D. A Motion to Adopt an Amendment to the Flood Plain Ordinance -
Postponed.
9. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CLOSE EMERGENCY ACCESS
BE1WEEN BAYSWATER & GARDEN ROAD
Hurm indicated two letters were received from Garden Road residents regarding installation
of a semi-permanent barrier between Garden Road and Bayswater Road following the
Council's initial discussion of the request received from the Amesbury West Homeowners
Association at it's September 13 meeting.
10
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 11
~
Dresel described the difficulties caused by the semi-permanent barricades for turn around
of snow removal equipment. Nielsen stated that creating a Y turn around by moving the
bollards would reduce that problem.
Benson moved, Stover seconded to direct the staff to install 6"x6"x4' high treated wood
posts, 4' apart, to create a semi-permanent barrier at the emergency access between
Bayswater Road and Garden Road, placed in a position to allow for adequate turnaround
at that location, and directed that the area be posted "No Parking."
Motion passed 5/0.
10. APPEAL ZONING VIOLATION (deferred from September 13 meeting)
.
Appellant:
Location:
LeRoy Bishop
24140 Smithtown Road
Mr. LeRoy Bishop, assisted by his son, Jeff Bishop, explained his reasons for appealing the
zoning violation. He stated most of the boats offered for sale on his property, belonging to
his family members and the items displayed by others have been removed. He felt strongly
that family members should be allowed to use his property for storage or recreational
vehicles or equipment items for sale. Jeff Bishop indicated he was unaware of the City's
ordinance prohibiting outdoor sales by non-residents.
Following discussion, it was suggested that the items owned by family members stored on
Mr. Bishop's property be registered in the name of LeRoy Bishop as a co-owner in order
to comply with the ordinance. The Bishops accepted the recommendation.
11.
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE FEE
SCHEDULE INCREASING SEWER RATES
.
Rolek reviewed the recommendation to increase the sanitary sewer utility rates $4.80 per
quarter. He explained that 3% of the increase ($1.60) represents costs associated with
operation and maintenance of the system and 5% ($3.20) represents legal and technical
costs associated with the City's dispute with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
(MWCC). He stated the increase does not include MWCC rate increases. The new
residential rates per quarter effective immediately after Council approval and publication
will be: $59.55; $39.70 low income; $29.78 seasonal; and for commercial: $71.35/quarter plus
$2.50 each 1000 gallons in excess of 28,500 gallons/quarter. He acknowledged that
Shorewood's rates are probably the highest in the metropolitan area.
Stover supported the need to increase the rate to cover the costs described. Brancel,
however, agreed the increase may be warranted, but could not support the increase because
of the high level of current rates.
11
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 12
Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 93-279, "An Ordinance Amending
Section 1301.02 of the City Code, Sanitary Sewer Service Charges."
Motion passed 4/1. Brancel voted nay.
12. DISCUSSION ON POLICY MATIERS - 1994 Budget Issues - None.
13. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Robert Rascop, 4560 Enchanted Point, informed the Council that he observed a large tanker
dumping into the sewer system at one of the City's lift stations. The staff was requested to
investigate this occurrence to determine whether it is a permitted dumping. Rascop brought
the Council's attention to permitted sump pump drainage into the sewer system in some
metropolitan areas; the staff was requested to investigate the legalities involved.
12.
ADMINISTRATOR AND STAFF REPORTS - None.
.
13. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
Benson requested that he be replaced as liaison to Community Service Group due to
difficulties in attending the meetings and recommended the Council appoint Mr. Tad Shaw
to that position.
Stover moved, Benson seconded to appoint Mr. Tad Shaw, 5580 Shore Road, to the position
of Shorewood's Community Service representative.
Motion passed 4/1. Brancel voted nay.
Brancel and Daugherty briefly commented on the recent meeting of the MWCC task force.
Keane indicated he will provide clarification of the rules defining official Council meetings .
as requested by Stover. The Council agreed to conduct interviews for appointments to
Planning Commission vacancies at 7:00 p.m., October 11, to be followed by the regular
Council meeting.
14. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adjourn the City Council Meeting at 10:45 p.m., subject
to the approval of claims.
Motion passed 5/0.
12
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 - PAGE 13
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Arlene H. Bergfalk
Recording St~cretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
ATTEST:
. JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
~
BARBARAJ.BRANCEL,MAYOR
13
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR
RIDGE ROAD ADDITION
WHEREAS, The Highland Bank (Applicant) has an interest in certain land within the
City of Shorewood, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof,
and has applied to the Council for preliminary approval of a plat to be known as Ridge Road
Addition; and
WHEREAS, Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner and his
recommendations have been duly set forth in a Memorandum to the Planning Commission
and City Council dated 3 September 1993, which Memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Shorewood Planning Commission on
7 September 1993, for which notice was duly published and all adjacent property owners
duly notified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That Applicant's request for preliminary plat approval of Ridge Road Addition
is hereby granted.
2. That such approval is subject to the recommendations set forth in the City
Planner's Memorandum dated 3 September 1993, and the terms and conditions contained in
the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of 7 September 1993 on file at City Hall.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 11th day of
October, 1993.
Barbara Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm
City Administrator/Clerk
3A
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SETBACK TO ERNEST PA VLISICH
WHEREAS, Ernest Pavlishich ( Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 27470 Pine Bend,
in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows:
"Lot 6, Block 2, Tonka View Addition; and
WHEREAS, the property is substandard in the R-1A zoning district, with respect to lot width; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a nineteen-foot setback variance on the north side of the
property to build a garage and room addition on the east end of the existing house; and
. WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were
duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated 2 September 199~" which
memorandum is on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the
Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 September 1993, the minutes of which meeting are
on file at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant's request for a variance was considered by the City Council at their regular
meeting on 27 September 1993 and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows:
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the Subject Property is located in an R-1A single-family residential zoning district
and is also subject to the requirements of the "S" Shoreland District.
2. That the R-1A zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 120 feet and the subject
property is only 90 feet wide.
3. That the R-1A zoning district requires a 50-foot side yard setback abutting a street and
the existing house is only 31 feet from Pine Bend.
4. That the proposed addition maintains the existing building line of the house and lines
up with the house on the property to the east.
~3B
.
.
5. That building further south on the lot would have a detrImental effect on the existing
home on the property to the south.
6. That the proposed structure is a reasonable use of the subject property and does not
have an adverse affect on neighboring properties.
7. That the Applicant does not own property adjoining the subject property.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the Applicant has satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under Section
1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has established an undue hardship as defined by Minnesota
Statues Section 462.375, Subd. 6(2).
2 That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants Applicant's request for
a variance as set forth above.
3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy ofthis
Resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 11 th day of October,
1993.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
e
.
~
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING COOPERATIVE PROJECT NO. 93-1,
BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING OF STREETS
WHEREAS, the city of Shorewood, in cooperation with the City
of Tonka Bay, entered into a contract with Astech contracting
Corporation for street sealcoating services; and,
WHEREAS, the Contractor has petitioned for final acceptance
and payment for the project based on work performed to date; and,
WHEREAS, the Project Manager has made a final inspection of
the project and recommends acceptance and final payment be made by
the city.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
The City hereby does accept the work completed pursuant to said
contract, and approves final payment subject to the following
items:
1. The Contractor must make satisfactory showing that he has
complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92
requiring withholding of State Income Tax.
2. Evidence in the Form of an affidavit that all claims
against the contractor by reasons of the contract have
been fully paid or satisfactorily secured.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 11th
day of October, 1993.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, Administrator
3D
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 93-2, SANITARY SEWER,
WATE~~IN AND STORM SEWER, SEASON'S ELDERLY HOUSING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered the construction of a
local improvement known as Project No. 93-2 and described as
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer, Season's Elderly Housing
Project; and,
WHEREAS, such improvements have been or are in the process of
being constructed, and,
WHEl:<~EAS, part of the improvements are to be financed through
special assessment of costs to the benefitted property owners,
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Shorewood that:
1. A public hearing shall be held on the 8th day of
November, 1993, in the City Hall at 7:30 p.m., to pass upon
proposed assessments for Project No. 93-2, Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain and Storm Sewer, Season's Elderly Housing Project. At
such timE! and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvememt will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference
to such assessments.
.
2. The City Administrator/Clerk is hereby directed to cause
a notice of the public hearing on the proposed assessments to be
published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior
to the hearing, and state in the assessment notice the total cost
of the improvement. The City Administrator/Clerk shall also cause
mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in
the assessment roll and to provide each property owner with all the
information required by Minnesota Statutes, section 429.061.
3. The City Administrator/cierk shall have the assessment
roll available for public inspection at the city Hall during
regular business hours.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood,
Minnesota, this 11th day of October, 1993.
Barbara Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, city Administrator/Clerk
3E
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENTS FOR EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
WHEREAS,
sani tary sewer
Highway 7; and,
the City
service
Council has ordered the extension of
to the property located at 25840 State
WHEREAS, such extension has been or is in the process of being
constructed, and,
WHEREAS, part of the extension is to be financed through
special assessment of costs to the benefitted property owners,
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Shorewood that:
1. A public hearing shall be held on the 8th day of
November, 1993, in the City Hall at 7:35 p.m., to pass upon
proposed assessments for extension of sanitary sewer service to
25840 State Highway 7. At such time and place persons owning the
property affected by such extension will be given an opportunity to
be heard with reference to such assessments.
2. The City Administrator/Clerk is hereby directed to cause
a notice of the public hearing on the proposed assessments to be
published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior
to the hearing, and state in the assessment notice the total cost
of the improvement. The City Administrator/Clerk shall also cause
mailed notice to be given to the owner of the parcel described in
the assessment roll and to provide each property owner with all the
information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061.
e
3. The City Administrator/Clerk shall have the assessment
roll available for public inspection at the City Hall during
regular business hours.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood,
Minnesota, this 11th day of October, 1993.
Barbara Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk
3F
i=!_ r.'1
,r-~ .
i=-~.
- - " '-
- .- - - - '-.-
..
..
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at the City
Hall in said City on Monday, October 11, 1993, commencing at ____ p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
* * *
* * *
* * *
.
The following resolution was presented by Member -
who moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RE:SOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OP
$325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
SERIES 1993A
.
WHEREAS, in 1987, the City sold $875,000 General Obligatio'n
Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1987A, which are subject to being
called for prior redemption on February I, 1994, and
WHEREAS, Springsted Incorporated, the city's financial advisor,
has reviewed the status of the sinking fund for these bonds and has
indicated that the city should issue improvement bonds to refund the
outstanding bonds which will mature over the period of time that the special
assessments supporting said prior 1987 bond issue will be collected, and
WHEJREAS, the City has additional new improvement projects which
need to be funded, and
WHEREAS, the current bond market is very strong and it appears tha't
favorable interest rates can be obtained for definitive bonds, .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of
Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined:
(a) That the assessable publ ic improvements (the
"Improvements") financed by the General
obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series
1987A, have been made and duly ordered and
contracts let for the construction thereof by the
3G
idF ~ 11,1
! :.. ~ )) ,~ - .2 I~ _ S
i i 1-: t iJ r5 ~ '~~ ~ 1 4 : i~) J ['"j Ci . IJ 0 7 F.:J J
~
~
Ci ty pursuant to the provl-s lons of MinnesotA.
Statutes, Chapter 429.
(b) The outstanding bonds are subject to being called
on February I, 1994, and can be financed in the
following manner:
1993 Project Costs
Less: MnDOT Funds
City Cash Contribution
$293,000
(40,000)
(36,400)
:.
Net Costs to be Financed
Plus: Costs of Issuance
Allowance for Discount Bidding
Total Bond Issue
$303,372
18,378
3,250
$325,000
Subtotal $216,600
Bonds to be Refunded 420,000
Less: City Funds for Refunding (333,228)
.'
..
}.
,'" }.
(d)
That it is necessary and expedient to the sound,
financial management of the affairs of the City tOJ
issue $325;000 General Obligation ImprovementX
Bonds, Series 1993A (the "Bonds"), to provid~"
financing for the Improvements and th~
refinancing of the 1987 improvement bonds.
All Bonds shall be fully registered.
"
(c)
.,.'
- -'" "
2. In order to provide financing for the Improvements, the Cit?
shall issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $321,750 j in order to provide in
part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time.
addi tional Bonds shall be issued in the amount of $3,250. Any excess of th'!
pu r chase pr ice of the Bonds ove r the s urn of $321,750 shall be credi ted to th,;
debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest firs:
coming due on the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued and sold in accordanc'!
wi th the terms of the Terms of Proposal which is attached hereto and marke:l
Exhibit A. .
3. The City hereby authorizes Springsted Incorporated tJ
negotiate the sale of the Bonds on its behalf in accordance with th~
attached terms of proposal. Proposals shall be received until 12~30 p.m.
on November 8, 1993. The City Council shall meet on Monday, November 8J
1993, at 7 :00 p.m. for the purpose of considering the proposals on the Bond)
and taking any other appropriate action.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was dulf .
seconded by Member___._________ and upon vote being taken thereon, tha
following voted in favor thereof:
. 'J i
t :> :"'j']
;.-. . . '~
~~ ;~~}~
, ~.. 1"
',:',:".',
..
. - ..~ .
....;.. }
"
'..-.-4,--
~. :. 1:~.
~ ,"-
'\.' .:.'
.'.......
......
.,~:
1;,:....
{.
~.C -
'{;"'l
~ j
- -' ~ :_:. ;) 1,_1 i 1-.) .')
..
..
and the following voted against:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
App:roved and signed this _ day of _____, 1993.
------- -.-----
Mayor
Attest:
--.-------. ....----.--- ---,-,-
City Administrator-Clerk
-!
L
,
I
U.I r L '.'1'1
--<
i t. L. _' ",_" '_' ~ t) ~ ':-1
uc t I),:" '~I:, 14: U4 f',ID. UU (' 1-'. Jb
..
..
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNBPIN
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
I / the un de r s i 9 n e d I be i n 9 the d u 1 y qua 1 i fie d and act i n 9 C i t Y C 1 e C~
of the Ci ty of Sho rewood I Minnesota, do he reby ce rt i fy tha t I have ca refulll
compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a (regulari
(special) meeting of the City Council of said City held on October 11,1993,
with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, tru ~
,1.. and complete transcr ipt thereof, insofa r as the same relates to th ~
issuance and sale of $325,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Serie I
-'
." ~
'-.:..
,
, ~.
,
'.
,/ )
1993A of the City.
WITNESS My hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the Ci t<,
this __ day of ______~.. ___, 1993.
City Administrator-Clerk
City of Shorewood
(SEAL)
, ,
:J /
"::o",i
, "
'I
"
j
Recommendations
For
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
$325,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1993A
.
.
Study No. S11 06L 1
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
October 6, 1993
!
October 6, 1993
.
Mayor Barbara Brancel
Members, City Council
Mr. James C. Hum, Administrator-Clerk
Mr. Allen Rolek, Finance Director
City of ShorE:lwood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $325,000 General Obligation Improvement
Boncls, Series 1993A
We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of these
bonds according to the terms and conditions set forth in the attached proposed "Terms of
Proposal." This issue will incorporate the financing of the Seasons Improvement Project
currently under way within the City and the refunding of the 1995 through 2001 maturities of the
City's $875,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1987A, dated April 1 , 1987 (the
"1987A Bonejs"). These bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429
and 475.
Combining 1the financing of the City's current improvement project and the refunding of the
1987A Bonds into a single issue reduces the City's cost of issuing the bonds by avoiding
unnecessary duplication of bond printing, official statement printing and registrar costs, as well
as a lower financial advisory fee.
e
The composition of the issue is as follows:
Seasons Improvement Costs *
Less: MNDOT Funds
City Cash Contribution
Net Seasons Improvement Costs
Bonds to be refunded
Less: City Cash Contribution
Net Hefunding Costs
Net Costs to be Financed
Plus: Costs of Issuance
Allowance for Discount Bidding
Totall Bond Issue
$293.000
(40,000)
(36.400 )
$216,600
$420,000
(333.228 )
86,772
303,372
18,378
3.250
$325.000
*
Includes construction, engineering, contingency and administration.
City of Shomwood, Minnesota
October 6, 1993
Included in the principal amount of the bond issue is a provision for discount bidding in the
amount of ~>3,250, representing $10 per bond. This discount is a means of providing the
underwriters with all or part of their profit and/or working capital for purchasing the bonds and
permits them to reoffer the bonds at or close to a par scale.
New Money Portion
The new money portion of this issue will be used to finance the Seasons Improvement Project.
The composition of the new money portion of this issue is as follows:
Net Seasons Improvement Costs
Costs of Issuance
Allowance for Discount Bidding
Rounding
$216,600
10,878
2,205
317
Total New Money Portion of Bond Issue
$230,000
.
Appendix I iis the projection of assessment income for the new money portion of the bond
issue. All assessments are expected to be filed on or before November 1, 1993 over a term of
ten years of equal annual installments of principal with interest charged on the unpaid balance
at a rate of approximately 1.75% over the net interest rate on the bonds, which we have
estimated to be 5.85%. We have not made any projections of prepayments or delinquencies of
special ass€!ssments and are assuming for all structuring purposes that assessments will be
collected as scheduled.
.
Appendix II is the recommended cash flow for the new money portion, which has been
structured alrOund the projected assessment income (as developed in Appendix I). Columns 1
through 5 show the years and amounts of principal and estimated interest due and payable on
the new money portion of the bonds. Column 6 shows the total estimated debt service
required to pay 100% of the debt service, with Column 7 showing the 105% requirement as set
forth by State statute, which is a protection to the bondholder and to the City in the event 100%
of assessmemt collections are not received as expected. Column 8 shows the projection of
assessment income from Appendix I and Column 9 shows the net levy requirement which
represents tl1e City's share of these improvement projects. However, if the City collects 100%
of the assessments as projected, no tax levy will be required because the total projected
assessment income in Column 8 exceeds the net debt service requirements in Column 6.
Refunding Portion
The proceeds of the refunding portion of this issue, along with approximately $333,228 of
excess debt service funds contributed by the City, will be used to refund the City's $875,000
General Oblligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1987A. The 1987A Bonds are callable on
February 1, 1994, and therefore we are recommending the City proceed with the refunding of
the 1987 A Bonds at this time to take advantage of the low interest rates in the municipal bond
market. The net interest rate on the callable maturities of the 1987 A Bonds is 6.36%. We
estimate the callable maturities can be refunded at a net interest rate of approximately 3.89%,
resulting in a total dollar savings to the City, net of all costs of issuance and discount and cash
contribution, of approximately $85,480 and a present value savings of approximately $31 ,750.
We have discussed this refunding with Mr. Rolek, who has advised us the City will have
approximately $430,000 in debt service funds for the 1987A Bonds after second half 1993 tax
collections. The City will need to retain $80,000 of the debt service funds to make the
February 1, 1994 principal and interest payment as originally scheduled, leaving approximately
Page 2
e
.
City of Shorelwood, Minnesota
October 6, 1993
$350,000 available to reduce the size of the refunding portion of this issue. After making an
allowance for any shortfall in second half 1993 tax collections, the City's debt service fund
contribution to the refunding portion of this issue will be approximately $333,228. One of the
advantages of the refunding is that the City has received substantial prepayments of special
assessments which funds, over the past several years, have not been able to be invested at the
interest rate carried on the 1987A Bonds. Therefore, the City is actually losing money by
receiving the!se prepayments. We estimate new bonds will be sold at interest rates less than
4%, and thelrefore it will be easier for the City to invest any additional prepayments at interest
rates closer to the net interest rate on the new bonds.
The refunding portion of the issue includes all costs of issuance including the bond discount.
All savings Eistimates are net of these costs. To account for the actual underwriter's discount
on the bonds, actual costs of issuance and the actual cash available from the debt service
fund, which may differ from the assumptions made in these recommendations, we have
included a provision in the offering to permit the City to increase or decrease the principal in
any of the maturities in a total amount not to exceed $15,000 to offset any fluctuation.
Attached as Appendix III is a complete analytical summary of the refunding portion of this issue,
which has b,een structured around even principal payments. Appendix III, Schedule A, shows
the debt service of the 1987A Bonds (refunded bonds) as it exists now. On the call date of
February 1,1994, all of the remaining bonds maturing in 1995 through 2001 will be called for
redemption. The total amount of this refunded principal is shown in Schedule B. The
nonrefundedl principal and interest, namely the February 1, 1994 debt service payment, is
shown in Schedule C. The estimated debt service for the new refunding bonds is in
Schedule D. The City will begin to pay debt service on the refunding portion of this bond issue
on August 1, 1994. The final maturity on the refunding portion of this issue will be February 1,
2001, the same as the original 1987A Bonds. The anticipated annual savings, based on current
rates in the bond market, is shown in Column 6 of Schedule E.
Combined Il;sue
Appendix IV is the combined debt service for the new bond issue, blending the principal
payments of the new money and the refunding portions of the bonds into a single issue to
minimize costs. These bonds will be dated December 1, 1993, and mature each February 1 ,
1995 through 2004. The first payment on the bonds will be an interest payment due August 1,
1994 in the E~stimated amount of $7,800. This payment will be made from first-half assessment
collections rl9ceived in 1994 on both the new money portion and the refunding portion of this
issue. The following February 1, 1995 principal and interest payment will be made from
second-half assessments collected in 1994, plus surplus first half collections. This cycle will
continue for the life of the issue.
We recommend the bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2002, be callable on February 1,
2001, and oln any day thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. This call feature,
representing $60,000, or approximately 18.5% of the bond issue, will permit a prepayment of
those bonds should substantial prepayments of assessments be received or if future market
conditions warrant a refinancing of this issue.
As with all issues of the City, we recommend an application be made to Moody's Investors
Service of NI9W York for a rating of this issue. We will provide Moody's with the necessary data
upon which they will make their rating analysis and make the application on your behalf. We
do not anticipate a change in the City's "A" rating from Moody's.
Page 3
p
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
October 6, 11993
Federal Rebate - ArbitraQe
All tax-exempt bonds are subject to federal arbitrage regulations. The "final" arbitrage
regulations were published in June 1993. One of the requirements included rebating arbitrage
profits to the U.S. Treasury. Generally speaking, all arbitrage profits (the yield difference
between thE~ earnings on the investments and the yield on the obligations) must be rebated to
the Treasury. There are some exemptions to this rebate requirement which include:
(i) A small issuer exemption if the certificates are for governmental purposes and the issuer
reasonably expects to issue not more than $5,000,000 tax-exempt obligations during
the c:alendar year.
(H) A six-month exemption if all of the proceeds are expended within six months of
certi1~icate issuance.
(Hi) An 18-month expenditure test if at least 15% of proceeds are expended within 6 months,
60% within 12 months and 100% within 18 months.
.
A two-year expenditure test if at least 75% of the proceeds of the issue are used for
construction and if 10% is expended within six months, 45% within 12 months, 75%
within 18 months and 100% within two years.
For items (iii) and (iv), if it is reasonably required that a retainage be maintained to enforce the
completion of a contract, up to 5% of the proceeds may be retained for an additional 12
months. NHt proceeds subject to these expenditure tests include investment earnings on the
original bond proceeds.
(iv)
Since the City does not anticipate issuing more than $5,000,000 of tax exempt bonds in this
calendar year, the City will meet the small issuer exemption test (i) above and will be exempt
from rebate.
.
Prior to the 1993 final arbitrage regulations the small issuer exemption also exempted any debt
service funds from rebate requirements. The 1993 regulations changed that so only bona fide
debt servicEl funds are exempt from rebate. A bona fide debt service is defined as a fund for
which there! is an equal matching of revenue to debt service expense with a carry over
permitted equal to the greater of the investment earnings in the fund during that year or 1/12 of
the debt service of that year. If the City receives substantial prepayments of special
assessments on the bonds, those prepayments will have to be used to either call in the bonds,
if possible, or the yield on those funds will have to be restricted to the yield on the bonds.
Economic Life of Financed Facilities
The 1993 "final" arbitrage regulations brought all tax-exempt issues into the calculation of
"economic life." Previously this requirement was only for private activity bonds. The intent of
this requirement is that the Treasury does not want bonds outstanding longer than is
necessary, thus creating more tax-exempt bonds in the marketplace than are needed. The
general safle harbor for assuring that bonds comply with the regulations is if the average
maturity of the bonds does not exceed 120% of the economic life of the financed facilities.
Since the new money portion of the bonds are being issued for street improvements which,
under the Treasury guidelines have an economic life of 20 years, the new money portion of the
bonds is in compliance with this regulation. In regard to the refunding portion of this bond
issue, the clverage maturity of the refunding portion of this issue is 3.63 years and the time
which has edapsed from the date of issuance of the 1987 A Bonds (April 1, 1987) to the date of
issuance of the new bonds (December 1, 1993) is 6.66 years, for a total of 10.29 years.
Page 4
City of Showwood, Minnesota
October 6, 1993
Federal Reimbursement Regulations
The Federal Treasury has enacted reimbursement regulations to regulate issuers who wish to
issue tax-exE~mpt bonds to recover costs of prior expenditures. The reimbursement regulations
require that :if the issuer proposes to reimburse itself for expenses they paid prior to receipt of
bond procel3ds, it must have made a declaration of that intent within 60 days of the actual
payment of the expense. There are exemptions for architectural and engineering fees and
miscellaneous start-up costs. It is our understanding the City has taken whatever actions are
necessary to comply with the federal reimbursement regulations in regards to the new money
portion of this bond issue.
Bank-Qualifi43d Obliqations
.
The Tax Reform Act also restricts the ability of banks to deduct tax-exempt interest as a
carrying expense under certain circumstances in calculating their tax liability. Since the City
does not expect to issue more than $10,000,000 of tax-exempt obligations in 1993, these
bonds will biB designated as "qualified obligations." This qualification will help the marketability
of the issue.
Sale Proces!~
.
The 1991 LElgislature amended bond sale procedures to permit the non-public issuance of
obligations if the issuer retains an independent financial advisor. Springsted Incorporated
remains a proponent of competitive bidding but sees some advantages to the new legislation.
We recommend competitive negotiated sales where all bidders reasonably expected to
compete for the issues are notified of the pending sales, and competitive bids are received but
no legal advertisement is published. The issuer benefits from eliminating the publication costs
and any risk of having an issue delayed due to the time required for publication or the
inadvertent failure of a legal notice to be published. In our ever changing industry published
notices are no longer a critical source of information for bidders. Other than for publication,
you should see no change in your issuing procedures or in the bidding results.
We recommend these bonds be offered for sale on Monday, November 8, with proposals
received at the offices of Springsted Incorporated at 12:30 P. M. At that time, all proposals
received will be opened and verified for accuracy, and a bid tabulation will be prepared for
presentation to the City Council for action at their regular meeting at 7:00 P.M. that same
evening. A representative of Springsted Incorporated will attend your meeting to provide
recommendations as to the acceptability of proposals received. The option of Sure-Bid will
again be available to underwriters, as described in the Terms of Proposal attached to these
recommendations.
Respectfully submitted,
~c0'l"/dJn~
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
mli
Page 5
APPENDIX I
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1993A
New Money Portion
Prepared October 5, 1993
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
PROJECTED ASSESSMENT INCOME
Seasons Improvements
Filing Date: 11/ 1/1993
Filing Collect Interest
Year Year Principal @ 5.850% Total
------- ------....... .. ... ... - .. .. .. -
1993 1994 23,000 15,704a 38,704
1994 1995 23,000 12,110 35 , 11 0
. 1995 1996 23,000 10,764 33,764
1996 1997 23,000 9,419 32,419
1997 1998 23,000 8,073 31,073
1998 1999 23,000 6,728 29,728
1999 2'000 23,000 5,382 28,382
2000 2~001 23,000 4,037 27,037
2001 2~002 23,000 2,691 25,691
2002 2~003 23,000 1,346 24,346
TOTALS 230,000 76,254 306,254
a) Includes interest from filing
date to 12/31/1994.
-
Page 6
...... m - ,..OCO 000 C')COC'),..
't:l ea ~o COC')O) C')C\lI.(),..
Ol ~ ......,.. 0,.... ,.. COC')CO~
C') +'" e: 0.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0) ea e: t.. C\l C')C')C\lC\l
0) t.. <: ~
,.. 0 en
Q.
~t..
I.() 0
U
t.. e:
Ol - ...... +'" +'" 000 ,.. COC\lO 000 ,..
.0 ea Ol e: 0) CO OCO ,....
0 a +'" Z Ol C\l ,....0 0
+'" L.l.J 0 e ~
uf- f- Ol ,.. C\l
oen t..
~ ..-l Ol
't:lZ ~ ......
Ol- r:r ~
t..a: Ol 't:l
eaa.. a: Ol
Q.en ::.
Ol 't:l +'" Ol ~o~o)C')COC\l""''''tO ~ u
t.. >. Ol e: eco o,..tO,..r--.C\lcoC')O)~ I.() m
a..ee +'" Ol 0 r--.,..,....~or--.C')OtOC') C\l
u e u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m
Ol m e: coI.()C')C\l,..o)co,....l.()~ to ..-l
'1""'\ m - C')C')C')C')C')C\lC\lC\lC\lC\l 0 ::.
0 Ol C') +'"
t.. m
a.. m '+-
. <: 0
m
~ ...... C') OtO 0,..0 0) 0) CO I.() ,.. e:
I.() ea r--. C\lCOtOOco,..~oC')C') 0) 0
0 +'" tOC')I.(),....r--.COI.()r--.coO) CO .~
,.. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +'"
f- tO~C')C\l,..o~C')C\l,.. C\l ea
C')C')C')C')C')C')C\lC\lC\lC\l 0) t..
'+- C\l Ol
0 ~ +'"
~I.()O) ~ ......
~o~ ,.. ea
0)C\l,.. ,..
~ ~ ~ +'"
...... ......+'" O)C')COC')COC')OOOO ~ COC\l ,.. ~ e:
ea ea m to r--.~tO~tO~COCOI.()O) ~ ~ I.() ea
+'" Q..Ol COr--. 0),.. C\l C')C')I.()""'CO 0) u
0 .~ t.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~
f- u Ol ~C\l,..,..00)C')C\l,..0 CO '+-
e:+", C')C')C')C')C')C\lC\lC\lC\lC\l r--. .~
.~ e: C\l e:
t.._ 0) >.
a.. .~ t..
ee m ea
>
Ol
+'" O)C')COC')COC')OOOO ~ +'" m 0
m I.() ,....~tO~tO~COCOI.()O) ~ m ~ m
Ol CO""'O),..C\lC')C')I.()""'CO 0) Ol +'" ea ......
t.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t.. e: +'" u ea
Ol O)r--.tOtOl.()~C')C\l,.. CO Ol ~ m Ol
+'" ~ +'" 0 Ol +'" >. >.
e e: e: u t.. ea ea ea
- - m Ol a: e e
.~ +'"
...... a e: m 't:l
<: ea - Q Ol .~
C') ~ m 0).0
0) m ~~~~~~~~~~ e: ~ +'" - e:
0) Ol ~ 000001.()01.()01.() e: ...... Ol ea+",
,.. +'" 0) ,.. C')I.()""'COO ,.. C')~ <: a.. Z Z ::.e:
ea u ~
m a: C\l C') C') C') C') C') ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Ol .~ u
ea .~ m m
+'" t.. ...... 000 0 00 0 00 0 0 Ol .~
0 Ol I:') ~ eaC') 000 0 00 0 00 0 0 ~~ +'" 't:l
m en I::l) 0) 0.- 000 0 00 0 00 0 0 C') ,.. r--.O) ea
Ol I::l) 0) .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C')~ C') ,.. e m
e: ..... ,.. u I.()I.()I.()I.()I.()I.()OOOO 0 0) ,.. .~ ~
e: m e: C\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\l C') C')I.() +'" t..
.~ 't:l ..... ,.. ,.. .~ C\l ~ C')~ m Ol
::E e: t.. C\l Ol +'"
0 a.. .~
~ee C\J C\lCO ,.. Ol t..
't:l e: ..... t.. ~
0 +'" 0 Ol ea t..
0 e: .~ '+- I.() to,.... CO 0) 0 ,.. C\l C') ~ +'" Ol
~ Ol +'" +'" 0 +'" C\l 0)0)0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 ea m 't:l
Ol e t.. m ea 0)0)0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 >.a: Ol e:
t.. Ol 0 Ol t.. ::E ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. C\l C\l C\l C\l C\l +'" +'" ~
0 > a.. t.. ea .~ ...... Ol ea
::. 0 Ol Ol m t.. ea +'" t.. ......
en t.. >. +'" >- t.. ~ ~ ea ea
Q.Ol e: ea +'" e: a: +'" ~
'+- e e: - '+- >.- C') ~I.() to ,.... COO)O ,.. C\l Ol ea e: m +'"
0 - 0 Ol 0 >,.. 0) 0)0) 0) 0) 0)0)00 0 en >-::E<: Ol u
::E '0 t.. +'" Ol 0) 0)0) 0) 0) 0)0)00 0 ...J Q t.. ea
>. Ol ~ m t.. ...J ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ..........C\lC\l C\l <: 't:l Ol
+"'0 ~ ,+-' +'" t.. ea f- e: 0)0)- +'" Ol
.~ Ol ea ea .~ Ol 0 0 > > e: ::.
Q~ Z l::l 2 u.. >- f- ee <:<:f- - f-
APPENDIX II
Page 7
APPENDIX III
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A
I Refunding Delivery Date Sources / Uses I
Sources of Funds on: 12/13/93
I
I Refunding Principal:
I Accrued Interest:
Total Sources of Funds:
Partial Current Refunding of
G.O. Imp. Ref. Bonds, Series 1987A
Even Annual Savings Structure
Refunding Bond Rating: A
.
Uses of Funds on:
IDiscount @ $11.00
lAce. Int. & Unused Disc:
I Refunding Expenses:
.: . stment to Call Date
II lal Uses of Funds:
Prepared: 10/05/93
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Current Refunding Summary
Date of Bonds:
Delivery Date:
Refunded Call:
1 st Callable:
12/01/93
12/13/93
02/01/94 I
02/01/95 I
Refunded Bond Call Date Sources / Uses
Sources of Funds on: 02/01/94
95,000.00
108.66
95,108.66
Invest. Proceeds Mature:
Inv. Earnings @ 2.75% :
Funds from Issuer:
Total Sources of Funds:
86,455.00
317.00
333,228.00
420,000.00
12/13/93
Uses of Funds on:
02/01/94
1,045.00
108.66
7,500.00
86,455.00
95,108.66
420,000.00
Refunded Principal:
Refunded Call Premium:
Excess Proceeds:
Total Uses of Funds:
420,000.00
! Refunded / Refunding Bond Comparison
As of:
12/01/93
Principal:
Interest:
IBond Yrs:
IAV9. Mat:
NIC:
Refunded
Statistics
420,000
111 ,345
1,750
4.167
6.36%
Refunding
Statistics
95,000
13,378
371
3.904
3.89%
Total Net Savings/Present Value Savings
Future Savings: 418,601.67
Less Funds From Issuer: 333,228.00
Plus Accr. Int. to D/S Fund: 108.66
Plus Exc. Proc. to D/S Fund:
Total Net Savings:
PresentValue Say @ 3.60%:
As % of P.V. Refunded Int.:
85,482.33
31,757.91
32.87%
Page 8
=~cy of S~o~ewcod, M~n~esota
P~ec'a.~e'~ :
0.U. Imp. Ref. Bonds, Series 1987A
Existing Debt S.ervice
By SPRI~GST~= =~c~~;2~a~~~
Schedule A
Date Principal Rate Interest Semi-Annual A..rmual
02/01/94 65,000.00 5.600% 14,915.00 79,915.00 79,915.00
08/01/94 13,095.00 13,095.00
02/01/95 60,000.00 5.800% 13,095.00 73,095.00 86,190.00
08/01/95 11,355.00 11,355.00
02/01/96 60,000.00 6.000% 11,355.00 71,355.00 82,710.00
08/01/96 9,555.00 9,555.00
02/01/97 60,000.00 6.100% 9,555.00 69,555.00 79,110.C
08/01/97 7,725.00 7,725.00
02/01/98 60,000.00 6.250% 7,725.00 67,725.00 75,450.0L
08/01/98 5,850.00 5,850.00
02/01/99 60,000.00 6.400% 5,850.00 65,850.00 71,700.00
08/01/99 3,930.00 3,930.00
.01/2000 60,000.00 6.500% 3,930.00 63,930.00 67,860.00
01/2000 1,980.00 1,980.00
02/01/2001 60,000.00 6.600% 1,980.00 61,980.00 63,960.00
.
Totals
485,000.00
121,895.00
606,895.00
606,895.00
Bond Years:
A vg. Mat..:
NIC.......:
1,760.83
3.631
6.358%
All lower calculations
are made from the date
of the refunding bonds
Refunded Bonds Only
Avg. Mat..: 4.167
NIC.......: 6.363
Page 9
=~ty of Shc~ewocdf ~innesota
-G.O. Imp. Ref. 3cnds, Series 1987A
Refunded PrinciDal and any Call Premium
Date
Principal
02/01/94
420,000.00
.
.
Totals
420,000.00
Call Date.............:
First Date Called.....:
Call Premium..........:
Premium
02/01/94
02/01/95
~ '
~:r-ecare'~ :
By S?R=NGS~2D ~ncc~pc~a:2~
Schedule B
Semi-Annual
420,000.00
420,000.00
Annual
420,000.00
420,000.00
This portion will be paid with proceeds.
Page 1 0
---j
c~ Shorewood, Minnesota
- -
.....-r;:::::.y-..,,::: ~~~,--. .
~ - .~ "-' '-A,. ~ '_ ......... .
:~.c. Imp. Ref. Bc~ds, Series 1987A
Non-Refunded Debt Service
3y S?~=~GS~~= :~~~~fC~3=~~
Schedule C
Date
Principal
Rate
Interest
Semi-Annual
Annual
02/01/94
65,000.00
5.600%
14,915.00
79,915.00
79,915.00
-
.
Totals
65,000.00
14,915.00
79,915.00
79,915.00
This portion Will be paid by the issuer. The first payment includes interest on
the entire existing debt service.
.. Page 11
=~=\. r- S~Q~ewood, Mi~~escta
:3.8. Ref~~ding Bonds, Ser~es 1993A
Refunding Debt Service
:=:;re'careci:
By SPRINGST~= =~~~~;~~~~2~
Schedule D
Date
Principal
Rate
Interest
Semi-Annual
Annual
08/01/94 2,173.33 2,173.33
02/01/95 15,000.00 2.900% 1,630.00 16,630.00 18,803.33
08/01/95 1,412.50 1,412.50
02/01/96 15,000.00 3.100% 1,412.50 16,412.50 17,825.00
08/01/96 1,180.00 1,180.00
02/01/97 15,000.00 3.300% 1,180.00 16,180.00 17,360.00
08/01/97 932.50 932.50
02/01/98 15,000.00 3.500% 932.50 15,932.50 16,865.00
08/01/98 670.00 670.00
02/01/99 15,000.00 3.700% 670.00 15,670.00 16,340.00
08/01/99 392.50 392.50
*1/2000 10,000.00 3.850% 392.50 10,392.50 10,785.00
o 1/2000 200.00 200.00
02/01/2001 10,000.00 4.000% 200.00 10,200.00 10,400.00
.
Totals
95,000.00
13,378.33
108,378.33
108,378.33
Bond Date. :
A vg. Ma t . . :
NIC.......:
12/01/93
3.904
3.889%
Delivery. . :
Discount.%:
Bond Yield:
12/13/93
1.10000%
3.59733%
Page 12
r--< __ ~ ~
____,I
sf Sh8~ew8od! M~~~esQca
~ ,
:-,':ce:s:'a:ce'=, :
-:.8. Ref~~di~g 3c~ds! Seyi~s 1993A
Annual Savings lmalysis
By SPRI~G5~~= =~c=~~=~~=:~
Schedule E
Refunding Non-Refunded Total New Existing Savings
Date Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service or (Loss)
(1) (2 ) (3 ) (4) (5) (6 )
02/01/94 79,915.00 79,915.00 79,915.00
08/01/94
02/01/95 18,803.33 18,803.33 86,190.00 67,386.67
08/01/95
02/01/96 17,825.00 17,825.00 82,710.00 64,885.00
08/01/96
02/01/97 17,360.00 17,360.00 79,110.00 61,750.00
08/01/97
02/01/98 16,865.00 16,865.00 75,450.00 58,585.00
08/01/98
02/01/99 16,340.00 16,340.00 71,700.00 55,360.00
08/01/99
.01/2000 10,785.00 10,785.00 67,860.00 57,075.00
C 01/2000
02/01/2001 10,400.00 10,400.00 63,960.00 53,560.00
.
Totals
108,378.33
79,915.00
188,293.33
606,895.00
418,601.67
Present Value Rate...:
Present Value Savings:
As % of P.V. Ref. Int:
3.5973%
31,757.91
32.87%
Funds from Issuer....:
Ace. Int. to D/S Fund:
Total Net Savings....:
(333,228.00)
108.66
85,482.33
Page 13
APPENDIX IV
City of Shorewood, Minnesota Prepared October 5, 1993
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1993A By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Combined Issue
Dated: 12- 1-1993
Mature: 2- 1
First Inte~rest: 8- 1-1994
Total
Year of Ye~ar of Principal 105%
Levy Mat. Principal Rates Interest & Interest of Total
( 1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6 ) (7)
1993 1995 40,000 2.90% 13,683 53,683 56,367
1994 1996 40,000 3.10% 10,568 50,568 53,096
1995 1997 40,000 3.30% 9,328 49,328 51,794
1996 1998 40,000 3.50% 8,008 48,008 50,408
1997 1999 40,000 3.70% 6,608 46,608 48,938
. 1998 2000 35,000 3.85% 5,128 40,128 42, 134
1999 2001 30,000 4.00% 3,780 33,780 35,469
2000 2002 20,000 4.15% 2,580 22,580 23,709
2001 2003 20,000 4.30% 1,750 21,750 22,838
2002 2004 20,000 4.45% 890 20,890 21,935
TOTALS: 325,000 62,323 387,323 406,688
Bond Years:
Avg. Maturity:
Avg. Annual Rate:
T.LC. Rate:
1,614.17
4.97
3.861%
4.069%
Annual Interest:
Plus Discount:
Net Interest:
N.LC. Rate:
62,323
3,250
65,573
4.062%
.
Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant
alterations of this schedule.
The actual underwriter's discount bid may also vary.
Page 14
THE CITY ttAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$325,000*
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBUGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993A
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, November 8, 1993, until 12:30 P.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint
Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award
of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
e
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated December 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1994. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The Bonds will be
issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as requested by the
purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main
corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of
the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the
books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding
month.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
e
1995 $40,000
1996 $40,000
1997 $40,000
1998 $40,000
1999 $40,000
2000 $35,000
2001 $30,000
2002 $20,000
2003 $20,000
2004 $20,000
*
The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $15,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any
discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the
principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1,2001, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after February 1, 2002. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of
the City and in such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as selected
by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge
special assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to finance
Page 15
.
.
.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Wurst, Pearson, Larson,
Underwood and Mertz of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds,
and of customary closing papers, including a no-litigation certificate. On the date of settlement
payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at
the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as
compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by
action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by
the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly-final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement' of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 25 copies of the
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of
assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated October 11, 1993
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ James C. Hurm
Administrator -Clerk
Page 17
.
.
ORDINANCE 93-____
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADOPTING
SECTION 802.03, SUBDIVISION 10
RELATING TO SNOWMOBILES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA does
ordain as follows:
Section 1: The City of Shorewood Code of Ordinances section 802.03
is amended by repealing Subdivision 10 as adopted with Ordinance
#91-245 on October 28, 1991 and adopts section 802.03, Subdivision
10 as follows:
802.03:
OPERATION GENERALLY: Except as otherwise
specifically permitted and authorized, it is
unlawful for any person to operate a
snowmobile within the limits of the City in
the following manner:
Subd. 10. At anytime within the City between the
hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
section 2:
publication.
This Ordinance shall take effect upon date of
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 1993.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, Administrator/City Clerk
4
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS
TO THE SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has advertised for
Shorewood citizens to apply to serve on the Planning Commission;
and
WHEREAS, the city Council has completed a review and
selection procedure for appointments to the Planning Commission;
and
WHEREAS, the position opening created by the resignation
of Planning Commissioner Louise Bonach runs through December, 1994;
and the position opening created by the resignation of Planning
Commissioner Jack Hansen runs through December 31, 1995.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Shorewood hereby appoints
to the City Planning Commission effective December 1, 1993 to
complete said term ending December 31, 1994; and
to the Planning Commission effective November 1, 1993
to complete said term ending December 31, 1995.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
11th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
to
.' ,
. -
.
.
MEMO TO:
Mayor and Ci"ty Council
FROM:
Planning and Engineering
DATE:
October 5, 1993
SUBJECT:
Traffic Report
Beverly Drive/Cajed Lane
Planning and Engineering have reviewed the Traffic Monitoring Report prepared by the
SL:NIPSD and the City half section maps for possible traffic control alternatives on the
referenced roadways. Specifically, the following alternatives were investigated.
1)
Close off the through route by building a cul-de-sac on Beverly and Cajed. This option
would have the benefit of completely eliminating cut-through traffic. In addition,
speeds would likely be kept low due to insufficient street length for acceleration.
However, right-of-way would have to be obtained for any of the four possible cul-de-sac
locations (Exhibit A attached) and an asphalt turn-around would have to be
constructed. The construction costs alone (per turn-around) would likely be in excess
of$6000. Finally, whatever cut-through traffic there is would likely be shifted to Mton
Road. It seems likely that Afton Road residents would demand similar attention.
2) An alternative to cul-de-sacs is to channelize traffic with "Y" configurations at the
intersections (see Exhibit B, attached). While this would still require right-of-way
acquisition it provides an added benefit of maintaining two accesses to the
neighborhood.
3)
Create one-way streets out of Beverly/Cajed and Mton Road. This option is relatively
low-cost, and would likely result in lower traffic volumes if Beverly/Cajed and Afton
were signed the same direction (i.e. southeast bound). Rush hour traffic would be
forced to use the CathcartlSmithtown Road intersection during one of the peak traffic
periods. If Cajed/Beverly and Afton were signed different directions, morning and
evening peak traffic would likely shift to either of the two roadways, and the
Cathcart/Beverly intersections would be unaffected. Alternating the traffic directions
(i.e.northwest bound in the a.m. and southeast bound in the p.m.) would create traffic
confusion at minimum and, at worst, lead to a safety problem.
4) Continue monitoring for traffic level changes on Cajed/Beverly but leave the existing
traffic patterns in place. All of the options listed above would shift traffic, at least at
parts of the day to other areas. The shifting to Cathcart and Smithtown is acceptable
due to their status as collector streets, However, Afton road will be impacted, and as
a local road, unacceptable traffic volumes could be generated.
#7AI
Summary and Recommendation:
,t
According to the police report, the vast majority of traffic is obeying the speed limit, and
volumes are less than 600 cars per day. We are currently doing additional counts to verify this
number. Unless future counts on significantly higher, we do not believe a change in traffic
patterns is warranted.
If, however, a change is to be made, it is recommended that residents of Afton Road be
contacted, and that the one-way approach discussed in 3 above be tried first.
c: Jim Hurm
Tim Keane
2.
~ ",
. .
.
.
f'.
h
~
S::.
;b
8
;s
lS
'"
<
o
-1
o
::0
l>
o
I
)>
Z
I
l>
(f)
(f)
fTl
Z
m
><
:r
-.
c:r
-.
....
~.~
.
.
I
.
.
I
~
..
,
.
.
~
~
I~ UJ
:os. t:
:P Jy" ) ~~~
lv- 'H~ ~~C) /.{ (-\ ~
~------ -'--- - : ! \ \ ~::; -
I I I \
~ _ _ _~ V
~~\O~
'il\
lJJ!\
. 30\\t\ ~\{
.
.
\ -
l J \ ~~.
\
CAJED LA~~
~~~ .
,,~~ ,
-
.
.
1---,__ ---- m__
.
.
I
.
.
I
~ k~~~ .. - --
r-~~ ~ )
~:::::. ~
,'::; <~-r~~
~ I ~ ~
: t-- / '~O~"1J
~ I -+_
I ;c'. ~r--. /' ---
~ ~j// ~. ('.....>.'....'~. 'r!
. ~ '.. 0 ~- 0 ~ ~.,
"" R. ' :~: ~
~ ~.
,~ :-
~
r-
~
-\ -
C)
:>
'-.l'
I
'(j)
s:
~
I
~
,0
':E
z
,
, "
CATHCART
.
.
~
c..
~
I ---' ..
~
,~--
~
.,- ::;0
~ ~
f-' cP_
i- ~
~ /~--------
l.:~ /
- - - - I
CHURCH: RD.
-
-: - - TIJJJJ]
RJ-- I Is:
z- l>
.0-- II)
~ Ir~--- ~
~. ------ l>
=~____ --- -- -----If~--- ---- STRAWB~RRY
- - - - - . - --
LA.
I II
"
: I I
F=:
: '~
" /'
-<)
~
~~
Q
Il
(j)
:c-
o
::0- ~
/Tl
:f-
o
_ 0-
~ MlpJE ~AF
~T'\
J>
~l I /
BURl/i- . /'
06
o
~
~~
~A '
"-:"', /'
'\:.<)
~
GRANT
I
00 \
v~.\
/-)-
~,~--~----
/ ~'i \\'jJ
, d \~ ~~,
-P ~ \ \,\f{\O
L---- _
.
o
J>
^
-?~
o
o~
-<1(
.
r
fTI
):>
."
~
::u
\
o
::u
--
~
~ ~
.
., \
1._- ____ __
~\.
~.
J
~l ,
~l
..,1
Z91.09 :;'
;21
2 .. I
(5) -
,
I
'-----
. -
, .,
~~
PART Ct' ,
~~
~
(8)
255
\00
..
t-Jcrt h
I
III=~
:3
( 6)
------1-------
~(g} ~
2
- (7)
............;....2&4..
-------I---~---
~ (5)
______1_____--
,~
I
I
RD ~N /~
II ." : ~
..J:\"':" . ~
. '\"..~ "
I~
PI
,..,
Cl
(t~) ~
-- ,=- _J
1
....
6 '"
.c
(t7) ~ ( 18)
113 11:3
~1 __ _l~J....oI__
113 115
I
1....- .-
'" I
.., ~ N ;;
J::: 13 '" 12 II ,.., 10 9 '"
",~(7) ~ Iri Iri Iri (3) Iri 8
( 6) .., '" (4) .., '"
,.., ,.., ( 5) ,.., '" ,.., ( 2)
....
14 ...:
~
292.02
~ 1
..-i ( 47)
~
156
156 156 156
4J
'" '" '" 1 '"
4 ~ 5 ~ 6 c:f ~
( 15) N ( 16) '" ( 17) '" ( 18) N
-; .
_.-" .t-
(41)
352.02
">.25 SiR.:
1;89'17';':'
"
,;:;
2
( 13)
j
,-
I
17 ...
I .f
Ne9"zg'45" E
1
1
.-
.. .-'~
I
; 26'3.
I
,
I
1
,
I
,
I
.........- 163.........
,
I
I
I
1
':&'~ rg&J4~AfrA1
r1."'~
V' ,
1
~---- - - - - -l~- ------
C!::l
I
,.
G j!~' v
~
<t:
u
-r
Et
y
d1 t&tf.$ C~1)
i;;-:l?D
(3::"';
8"':
"'2
~'"
I
I
I ..,
I ,;
: ~
I ...
I '"
,
I
I
I
Af&'~
I
I
I
Exhibit B
I
I
I
: 3
I
,
I
I
i (30)
it@,
I
I
$-1.5
,
I
I
,
I I
.., 1
.... , I
I I
I'l I
'" I I
%11MM 1/: 1
.., I
.... I l~"''\ I
I
...; I - -. 2 i
;;., A \ I ""'--,
( 29)
M
I
..,
;1
/
(31 )
(~
---
.7
~
---
...
COMPREHENSIVE RANDOM TRAFFIC MONITORING REPORT
I. Beverly Drive and Cajed Lane
II. Excelsior Boulevard
.
Prepared for:
CCII1r1f (Q)JF ~JBI(Q)~JEW(Q)(Q)]])
.
Prepared by:
South lake Minnetonkal Public Safety Department
7A2
,
.
.
SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBliC SAFElY DEPARTMENT
810 Excelsior Boulevard
Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
RICHARD A YOUNG
Chief of Police
(612) 474-3261
M~MQR~~n!!M
To:
City l~dministrator James C. Hurm
Chief Richard A. Young~/
September 29, 1993 '(5
From:
Date:
Subject: Speed Studies
On August 23, 1993 we met at noon and you informed me that the City
Council wanted a random speed monitoring study done in the Beverly and
Cajed area. They asked us to use unmarked cars and park in the
driveways of residents (particularly at 26930 Beverly) for a two month
period. A comprehensive report was then to be provided to the City
Council.
Immediately tha"t afternoon I informed the officers to begin such a
study. However, there are several things that need to be pointed out.
First, Minnesota State Statute 169.98 prohibits unmarked cars from being
used for the enforcement of highway traffic rules or general uniform
patrol. It does permit the use of specially marked vehicles at a ratio
of one in every ten normally marked patrol cars. We do have one of
these specially marked vehicles. It is blue with no roof light bar and
a police shield on the passenger door only, as authorized and required
by the same stat:ute. Due to safety concerns at accident scenes, etc.,
I do not permit the officers to drive this vehicle if they are the only
officer on duty. Since that occurs frequently, it would be impossible
to provide the comprehensive report to the City Council without also
using regular marked cars.
Secondly, the driveway at 26930 Beverly Drive is about the worst spot on
all of Beverly Drive to effectively work radar. It is in mid-block.
The radar beam needs room to work and vehicles need time and distance to
reach their top speed along the street. That speed would probably be
reached at that driveway, but the radar does not work that close or at
that type of an angle. The driveway also does not provide a good view
of the stop sign which is also the subject of complaints. The officers,
therefore, based on their experience, sat at different locations and in
different driveways where they could more effectively monitor the
traffic.
Thirdly, at a subsequent meeting between us on September 2, 1993, I told
you that the officers efforts had not discovered any flagrant and/or
frequent violations of traffic laws in the area. You then advised me
that the City Council also had asked for a speed study on Excelsior
Boulevard. You said I should cease our special efforts in the Beverly
and Cajed area for a two week period and to work Excelsior Boulevard
instead. After those two weeks, you asked us to return to the Beverly
and Cajed area. I informed the officers of this immediately. They then
worked Excelsior Boulevard from September 2, 1993 to September 17, 1993.
Serving Sowh Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay
r
..
Fourthly, on September 10, 1993, you faxed me a Request For Input which
asked me to submit my traffic studies to you by September 29, 1993 for
dissemination for the October 11, 1993 City Council meeting. Given this
time line and the change of location for two weeks, the study for
Beverly and Cajed will actually only cover a 23 day period, instead of
the sixty days asked for by the City Council. I, personally, think the
time period has been sufficient to show that there appears to be no more
of a speed problem in that area than any other and further comprehensive
study will not be of any benefit.
Lastly, the speed limit on Beverly and Cajed is 30 MPH, not 25 MPH as
posted. This was the reply received from the state dated July 8, 1993
in response to your request (copy attached). The officers can not
enforce an improperly posted speed limit. The statutory 30 MPH speed
limi t was used for this and any future enforcement actions on those
streets. Even if the speed limit was legally 25 MPH, only five
citations would have been issued. Given the amount of time spent in the
area, that is not a high number of citable speeders (in fact, it is very
low) . The state letter also has pointed out some other speed limit .
signage that may be incorrect and I will be working with you to identify
those problems in the near future.
My only recommendation to the City Council would be to correct the speed
limit signing problem by either placing the correct 30 MPH signs in the
area or asking the state for authorization to reduce the speed limit to
the currently posted 25 MPH. The latter seems unlikely given the
comments in the July 8, 1993 letter.
Enforcement contacts and other summary data for the two areas are:
Excelsior Boulevard
Total time worked by officers - 1,479 minutes or 24.65 hours
Number of citations issued/rate per hour
Speeding
Seat Belt
Suspended DL
10
2
1
1 citation every 2.46 hours
.
Number of warnings issued/rate per hour
Speeding 18
Tinted windows 2
No insurance 1
1 warning every 1.37 hours
One driver was arrested for four outstanding warrants
From 20.35 hours of detailed officer reports:
Number of vehicles observed - 1,244
Frequency of vehicles observed - 1 vehicle every 1.19 minutes
.84 vehicles per minute
Average speed of vehicles - 28.49 MPH
,.
Beverly and Cajed Area
Total time worked by officers - 2,098 minutes - 34.97 hours
Number of citations issued/rate per hour
Speeding
Stop sign
o
4
N/A
1 every 8.74 hours
Number of warnin~Js issued/rate per hour
Speeding
Stop sign
1 every 6.99 hours
1 every 4.37 hours
5
8
From 24.92 hours of detailed officer reports:
.
Number of vE:!hicles observed - 573
Frequency o:E vehicles observed - 1 vehicle every 2.61 minutes
.38 vehicles per minute
Average speE:!d of vehicles - 25.90 MPH
NOTE: All repor1ts are somewhat affected due to officers time spent on
traffic stops in the areas and such extraneous factors as visibility,
marked car use in some locations, lighting, radar detector use, etc.
The following pages are a shift by shift report of the officers
findings. Of particular interest are the officers report on violator
comments after b:!ing cited on August 25th and September 1st.
.
'~_"l~\I'lN",Eisor4 t
f1 ;:::.
:::J <
_ i--
~ a:
0) ,p
";>- ,".)
Or: TBP-'"
.
.
.h... ....ota Department of Transportation
" II
Metropolitan Division
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, OakdJle, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, ~vlinnesota 55422
5801 Duluth Street
Renlv to Golden Valley, MN 55422
to .
Telephone No. 612-591-4618
July 8, 1993
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Speed Zoning
City of Shorewood
Dear Mr. Hurm:
Enclosed as you requested are copies of all speed limit authorizations in
our file for Shorewood city streets. (Some streets have more than one
authorization, and for those streets the most recent one would apply.)
Also in response to your request, we inspected Beverly Drive and Cajed
Lane to estimate what the outcome of a speed zoning investigation would
be. It appears likely a 30 miles per hour speed limit for both roads would
result from a study, either by authorization or by reliance on statutory speed
limit provisions. 0Ne can find no record in our file that the currently posted
25 mph speed limit has a legal basis.)
During your July 6 telephone conversation with Dennis Nordby, you inquired
concerning MnjDOT's normal policy regarding establishment of speed
limits. I have enclosed some general information concerning factors
considered. (fhis information is the same as was sent to you in an August
22, 1991 letter.) When applied to short, local residential streets, these
factors generally result in a statutory speed limit recommendation. (In other
Sincerely,
.
..
James C. Hurm
July 8, 1993
Page Two
words, a posted speed limit is not judged to be a beneficial traffic control
device.) On through streets where non-local traffic can be expected and
enforcement is likely, a speed limit consistent with the prevailing speed of
traffic is most likely to be authorized.
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact Ed
Brown at this office (591-4617).
Attachments:
Authorizations
Speed zoning information
un O-J--
Robert E. Dixon
Traffic Studies Supervisor
RED:pl:EB
.
l-
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS
Establishment of speed limits is often an emotionally charged
issue, but it is important to remember that a speed limit sign is
a regulatory traffic control device and like other traffic control
devices it must not be overused or used arbitrarily if its
effectiveness is to be maintained. Minnesota law therefore
provides for speed limits to be based on the results of an
engineering and traffic investigation. Data collected and
evaluated during such an investigation includes:
.
- road type and width
- location and type of access points
- existing traffic control devices (signs, etc.)
- existing speed patterns
- accident history
- traffic volume
- sight distance restrictions
- test drive results
Of these items, speed patterns are the most critical because they
are determined by driver reaction to many of the other factors.
Test drives, examination of sight restrictions, and accident
history are used to look for indications that drivers are choosing
unsafe speeds.
Contrary to popular belief, speed limits do not generally determine
the speed of traffic. As noted above, vehicular speeds are
determined by driver reaction to perceived conditions (traffic
volume, road width and condition, roadside development, ect.).
Only an extraordinary and continuous enforcement effort can coerce
everyone to drive at speeds below what they consider reasonable.
~ Why then do we post speed limits? If a speed limit is posted at a
value considered reasonable by the majority of road users it can
perform the following functions:
_ Serve as a basis for enforcement against the small
percentage of motorists who drive at unreasonable or
unsafe speed
_ Influence people to drive at more a more uniform speed,
thereby minimizing conflicts in the traffic flow and
making it easier for those entering or crossing the
road to judge the speed of approaching traffic
_ Inform motorists, local residents, and pedestrians as
to the prevailing speed of traffic
It should be emphasized that to achieve these objectives the speed
limit must be considered a reasonable restriction by the majority
of drivers and therefore have a substantial voluntary compliance.
.
':-
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS
Page 2
Considering the functions of a speed limit, it becomes apparent
that a speed limit is of the most use on a through street where
nonlocal traffic can be expected, traffic volumes are high enough
to make smooth traffic flow a consideration, and enforcement
activ~ty is likely. Speed limits are of little benefit on strictly
local residential streets where virtually all traffic consists of
local residents who drive the road daily and are familiar with
conditions, and where enforcement activity is infrequent at best.
Another factor that discourages use of posted speed limits for
local. residential streets is the cost of signing. Not only must
each street be posted with speed limit signs if the speed limit
differs from statutory values, but in addition all locations where
the speed limit cannot be safely maintained (cuves, etc.) must be .'
adequately signed with warning and advisoy speed signs. The total
cost of signing can be very high and the benefit low. An
additional problem that can arise when all streets are speed zoned
by means of a study is that a variety of speed limits can result.
This can be confusing to the motorist and make enforcement
difficult. Because of the above factors, most cities choose not to
post speed limits for all streets, choosing instead to post only
through or collector streets.
BEVERLY AND CAJED AREA REPORT
Printed September 27, 1993
* 2029 Start
. 2032 28, 21, 23
2035 28 Went
2036 29
2040 20 Left
2042 23
2043 22
2045 24
2049 29
2054 29 stop
2103 End Total
:3/08/25 1000 Start
1003 21
1015 26
1020 25
1025 25, 24
1028 24, 23
1030 End Total
Date
93/08/23
*
93/08/24
.
*
Time
1627
1632
1633
1633
1635
1638
1641
1641
1653
1659
2049
2052
2119
0620
0622
0623
0625
0633
0634
0635
0636
0638
0639
0645
0645
0646
0647
0649
0650
0650
1634
1656
1656
1716
..
Soeed
Start
30
29
23
26
25,
33
Action/Residence/Misc.
Officer Keller
Officer Comments in Capital Italics
9 TOTAL VEHICLES OBSERoVED - COMPLAINANTS ADDRESS 26930
NOT GOOD AS IT IS IN MID-BLOCK AND STOP SIGN HARD TO
OBSERVE AND CARS DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH DISTANCE TO REACH
TOP SPEED - PARKED ON CUL-DE-SAC HIDDEN BY OVERHANG OF
TREES - HARKED CAR
26
End
27, 27
Speed warning issued - Same car
stop sign citation issued
Also stop sign warning issued -
Total time 32 minutes
Island View - Shorewood
as below - Island View - Shorewood
Start Officer Neururer 5 TOTAL VEHICLES OBSERVED (1 MOTORCYCLE) - PARKED ON
BEVERLY WEST OF CAJED - PLAIN CAR - AREA VERY DARK
Stop sign warning issued - Lake Virginia Dr - Shorewood
End Total time 30 minutes
Start Officer Rusch
21
23
34
25, 28, 32
23
30, 29
25, 23
27
30
25
14
34
25
25
22, 22
End Total time 30 minutes
20 TOTAL VEHICLES - MARKED CAR - EAST END OF BEVERLY
LICENSE PLATE NUMBERS WRITTEN DOWN ON ALL VEHICLES
From driveway on Beverly - just pulled out
start
Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT END OF CUL-DE-SAC - EXCEPT FOR WARNING, FASTEST
CAR WAS 26 MP H - MARKED CAR
Stop sign citation issued - Austin, Texas
Speed warning issued - same car as above
Total time 42 minutes
37
End
Officer Neururer PARKED ON BEVERLY JUST WEST OF CAJED FACING EAST - AREA
DARK - PLAIN CAR
to home on Beverly
home on Beverly
sign warning issued - Boulder Bridge Drive - Shorewood
time 34 minutes
Officer Rusch
SAT IN FRONT OF 27125 BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
time 30 minutes
* 1647 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT WEST END OF BEVERLY - VERY LITTLE TRAFFIC - MARKED
CAR - CITATION DRIVER, WHO WAS WEST BOUND AND WENT THROUGH THE STOP SIGN AT 15 MPH (ON RADAR) TOLD OFFICER HE SHOULD
BE THINKING ABOUT DRUG DEALERS, MURDERERS AND THE RAPES THAT ARE GOING ON WHILE HE (THE OFFICER) IS TRYING TO SLEEP
TONIGHT. WHEN SGT. WENT TO GO BACK TO HIS SQUAD f VIOLATOR GOT OUT OF HIS CAR AND FOLLWED SAYING HE SHOULD HAVE THE
RIGHT TO SPEAK HIS MIND. HE CONTINUED IN THE SAME VEIN AND SAYING THE OFFICER SHOULD BE CONCENTRATING ON THAT INSTEAD
OF HE WHO PAYS TAXES f WORKS FOR CARGILL f ETC. f ETC., ETC.
1715 Stop sign citation issued - Howards Point - Shorewood
1726 End Total time 39 minutes
*
2101 Start
Officer Cobb
7 VEHICLES, FASTEST 27 f PLAIN CAR
.
21L End
93/08/26 0638
VEHICLES AT SPEEDS OF
BELOW. 0644
0720
*
Called away - Total time 12 minutes
Start Officer Erickson SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 26830 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR - 18 TOTAL
15,29,24,21,29,23,29,28,24,22,24,27,27,24,27, 25, 2~ AND WARNING
38 Speed warning issued - Woodside Road - Shorewood
End Total time 42 minutes
1841 Start
1841 17
1843 23
1844 31
1845 21
1848 28
1851 28
1902 25
1904 21
1905 28
1907 26
1908 21
1911 26
1914 24
1924 End
1930 Start
2000 End
*
*
2056
2103
93/08/27
0653
0654
0656
0700
0705
0706
0711
0713
Officer Jorgenson SAT IN PRONT OP 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
From private drive on Beverly
From private drive on Beverly
Motorcycle
From private drive on Beverly
From private drive on Beverly
Total time 43 minutes
Sgt. Siegfried
SAT ON WEST END OF BEVERLY - FASTEST VEHICLE WAS 30 -
EVERYTHING ELSE WELL BELOW 30 - HARKED CAR
Total time 30 minutes
.
Start Officer Cobb CALLED AWAY - CHECKED TWO VEHICLES, PASTEST 24 MPH.
End Called away - Total time 7 minutes PLAIN CAR
Start Officer Erickson
22
22
33
21
22
24, 22
End Total time 20 minutes
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 26830 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
CALLED AWAY.
* 0824 Start Officer Keller SAT IN DRIVE'n'AY OF 27075 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
0829 From private drive on Beverly
0830 27
0834 30
0835 From private drive on Beverly
0836 From private drive on Beverly .
0838 22, 27
0838 From private drive on Beverly
0841 27
0845 33, 20
0854 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1908 Start Officer Jorgenson SAT IN FRONT OF 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1912 26 From private drive on Beverly
1916 16 From private drive on Beverly
1917 24
1918 33
1919 22
1920 22
1924 21
1925 29
1926 23
1932 End Called away - Total time 24 minutes
* 2027 Start Officer Cobb 16 TOTAL VEHICLE, 4 OF WHICH WERE RESIDENTS - FASTEST 29
2041 End Called away
2106 Start
2134 End Total time 42 minutes
93/08/28
0943
0943
0951
0955
0956
1000
1001
Start
20, 20
24
12, 29
26, 23
26
28
Officer Erickson ACROSS PROH 27123 BEVERLY - SEHI HIDDEN BY TREES _
HARKED CAR - MANY VEHICLES TO GARAGE SALE ON END OF ROAD
1002 21, 31
1005 23
1006 23 ..
1008 22
1011 25, 5
1012 End Total time 29 minutes
1658 Start
1704 23
1706 22
1707 18
1707 29
1708 28
1713 24
1716 30
1721 24
1723 29
1724 28
1725 27
1726 27
1727 20
1728 26
1728 End
1920 start
1928 End
0057 start
0102 23
0108 26
0109 25
0114 30
0119 End
"/08/29 0836 start
0836 28
0837 UNK
0846 21
0850 28
0852 27
0855 32
0906 End Total
~
1<
.
2038
2040
2041
2042
2047
2054
2056
2058
2101
2103
2104
2105
2109
.
2118
2129
2138
1540
1541
1543
1552
1554
1555
1556
1600
1601
1641
1645
1648
1702
1723
Start
25
29, 29
27
24
19
27,
22
31
31
26
25
End
start
37
End
Officer Keller
House party
House party
House party
SAT IN CUL-DE-SAC - HOUSE PARTY AT 27075 BEVERLY -
PLAIN CAR
House party
House party
House party
House parety
Total time 30 minutes
Officer Jorgenson SAT IN DRIVE AT 26125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
Called away - no vehicles observed
Called away - Total time 30 minutes
Officer Neururer
SAT ON BEVERLY WEST OP CAJED - HARKED CAR
To
To
25
To
private drive on Beverly
private drive on Beverly
private drive on Beverly
To private drive on Beverly
Radar detector - slowed to 18
Total time 31 minutes
Off icer Cobb ONLY 2 VEHICLES OBSERVED - MARKED CAR
Speed warning issued - Howards Point - Shorewood
Called away - Total time 20 minutes
Officer Rusch
PARKED JUST WEST OP CAJED ON BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
time - 30 minutes
Start Officer Erickson SAT ACROSS PROM 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
26
26
23
23, 25
20
20
28, 28
End Total time 21 minutes
Start
25
End
Start
Officer Keller
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 27075 BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
stop sign warning issued - Brentridge Drive - Shorewood
Called away
.
1726 22
1732 27
1732 End Total time 30 minutes ..
* 2023 Start Officer Neururer SAT ON BEVERLY WEST ~p CAJED - HARKED CAR
2029 27
2036 21
2038 27
2044 21, 21
2046 27
2051 25
2052 23
2053 End Total time 30 minutes
93/08/30 0719 Start Officer Rusch SAT BY 27125 BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
0720 23
0721 25, 24, 23
0722 26
0725 26
0727 24, 22, 29
0732 24
0738 24
0739 25 .
0740 27
0743 13 From private drive on Beverly
0743 24, 25
0745 23 From private drive on Beverly
0748 26 From private drive on Beverly
0748 22
0749 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1644 Start Officer Keller SAT IN DRIVEWAY 27075 BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
1644 29
1645 30, 20
1647 26, 31
1648 27
1649 20
1650 22
1652 29, 27
1656 To private drive
1657 30
1659 27, 32
1711 26 .
1712 26
1714 End Total time 30 minutes
* 2158 Start Officer Neururer SAT ON BEVERLY W OP CAJED - MARKED CAR
2203 30 To private drive
2212 27
2217 27
2224 End Called away - Total time 26 minutes
93/08/31 0644 Start Officer Rusch SAT AT EAST END OP BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
0644 20, 22, 28
0645 26
0646 22, 22
0651 22
0653 22
0657 22
0701 24
0702 21
0703 25
0708 20
0711 27, 20 ,24
0712 28
0714 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1542 Start Officer Keller SAT IN CUL-DE-SAC - PLAIN CAR - PARTIALLY CONCEALED
1542 29, 30
1546 22
1548 32
1553 20
1553 20 To private drive
1555 Too slow for reading
1604 31
1606 27, 28, 23 ..
1607 25
1609 32
1613 End Total time 31 minutes
1658
1730
2143
2149
2149
2217
2217
2218
2224
2225
3/09/01
0619
0620
0620
0626
0632
0633
0636
0637
0643
0646
0648
0649
.
Start
End
Start
38
End
Start
33, 21
23
25
End
Start
31
23, 21
30, 27
24, 25
31
25
21
26
End
sgt. siegfried
Total time 32 minutes
SAT END OF BEVERLY - MARKED CAR - FASTEST 32 MPH
Officer Neururer SAT ON BEVERLY WEST OF CAJ:ED - PLAIN CAR
Started to issue warning but called away to medical
Called away
Called away to domestic situation - Total time 14 minutes
Officer Rusch SAT BY 27125 BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
Too slow - Went to private drive
Stop sign warning issued - Blue Ridge Lane - Shorewood
Total time 30 minutes
1436 Start Officer Keller SAT AT 27075 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR - TOTAL OF SIX
rCLES DURING 31 MINUTE SHIFT, TWO OF WHICH WERE LOCAL RESIDENTS - THE OFFICER REPORTS THE ONE CITATION, WHEN
"PED WAS TOLD HE ROLLED THROUGH THE STOP SIGN. HE REPLIED THAT HE IS A LOCAL RESIDENT AND DOES NOT ROLL THROUGH
? SIGNS. HE WAS ADVISED THAT TODAY HE DID. HE THEN ADMITTED HE DID NOT KNOW WHERE HIS HIND WAS AND ASKED FOR A
llING. THE VIOLATION, HOWEVER, WAS SERIOUS ENOUGH TO WARRANT A CITATION. WHEN THE CITATION WAS ISSUED THE DRIVER
,PLAINED ABOUT TRAFFIC ON HIS ROAD (HOWARDS POINT). HE STATED THAT PEOPLE ARE URINATING AND DEFECATING IN THE ROAD
>;ELL AS TRAVELLING 40 TO 50 MFH. HE ATTRIBUTED THIS ACTIVITY TO THE HOWARDS POINT MARINA CLIENTELE. HE WAS
rSED THAT THE OFFICER WOULD TRY AND GIVE THAT ROAD MORE ATTENTION. THE DRIVER THEN SUGGESTED THE OFFICER SPEND HIS
'3 GOING AFTER DRUG DEALERS AND DRUNKS. THE OFFICER ADVISED HIM THAT HE WANTED TO DO JUST THAT, BUT HE ALSO HAD AN
,IGATION TO RESPOND TO COMMUNITY COMPLAINTS AS WELL. THE DRIVER THEN WENT ON ABOUT HIS DOG BEING RUN OVER ON
'iARDS POINT ROAD AND HOW PEOPLE ARE SHORE FISHING FROM HIS PROPERTY AND LAUNCHING THEIR FISH HOUSES PROM HIS
PERTY. HE SAID THIS WAS TRESPASSING. HE WAS ADVISED BY THE OFFICER TO CALL THE POLICE WHEN HE OBSERVES A
LATION. HE ALSO STATED HE HAS CALLED BRAD NIELSON IN THE PAST ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND HE STATED THAT MR. NIELSON
'IRED HIM THAT HE WOULD ASSIST HIM. HE WAS FINALLY ADVISED THAT THE OFFICER WAS NOT ACCUSING HIM OF BEING A HAD
.OR BAD PERSON, BUT TODAY HE WENT THROUGH A STOP SIGN AT A LOCATION THE OFFICER HAS BEEN DIRECTED TO SPEND TIME
; OF THE COMPLAINTS RECEIVED.
1458 stop sign citation issued - Howards Point Road - Shorewood
1507 End Total time 31 minutes.
1735 start
1750
1813 End
1835 Start
1836 26
1838 28
1842 21
1843 23
1853 End
2155 Start
2156 24
2201 21
2211 21
2215 21
2216 End
2229 Start
2259 End
/09/02 1315 Start
1322 22
1324 27
Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR - FASTEST CAR 32 MPH
stop sign warning issued - Melody Hill Road - Excelsior
Total time 38 minutes
Officer Jorgenson SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
Called away
From private drive
Total time 39 minutes
Officer Cobb
SAT AT END OF BEVERLY - HARKED CAR - 4 VEHICLES (21, 27,
31 & 24 MFH.
Total time 31 minutes
Officer Erickson SAT ACROSS FROM 27125 BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
1325 23
1327 26, 28
1331 21 ..
1334 23
1340 25, 23
1344 25
1345 26
1347 25
1348 24
1355 End Total time 40 minutes
93/09/17 0952 start Sgt. Talbot SAT IN PRONT OP 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1006 14
1009 30
1013 28
1013 27
1022 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1157 Start Officer Erickson SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1158 24
1205 26
1208 28
1213 24
1214 31, 28 .
1216 27
1220 24
1227 25, 23
1232 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1939 start Officer Jorgenson SAT NEAR 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1940 31
1942 21
1943 26
1946 25
1947 27
1950 End Called away
2000 Start
2002 32
2004 31
2005 31
2006 32
2008 20
2011 35
2016 End Total time 27 minutes .
-., 1850 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT WEST END OP BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR - PASTEST 32 MPH
1915 Stop sign warning issued - Woodside Road - Shorewood
1922 End Total time 32 minutes
93/09/18
*
0956 Start
1001 22, 26
1003 25
1004 18
1016 26
1018 18, 27
1020 31
1027 End Total
1249 Start
1251 28, 15
1252 23
1254 29
1256 15
1258 23
1303 25
1304 24
1305 26
1308 17
1309 26
1311 27
1312 24, 25, 26
1316 26, 30
1317 25
Officer Erickson SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
time 31 minutes
Officer Fink
SAT AT WEST END OP BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
1323 30
1324 19
1324 End Total time 35 minutes ..
* 1651 start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1657 29
1658 25
1659 26
1700 26
1702 28
1705 28
1707 24, 24
1710 29
1711 31, 25
1712 24, 28
1713 31
1715 28
1717 29
1721 End Total time 30 minutes
93/09/19 0922 Start Officer Erickson SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
0922 23
0925 20
0926 25
0927 18
0930 23
. 0933 26
0945 32
0954 End Total time 32 minutes
* 1301 Start Officer Rusch SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1303 20
1304 25
1306 25
1310 14
1311 27
1313 24
1318 24
1326 30
1328 24
1328 End Total time 27 minutes
1632 Start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 27170 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1634 28
1637 20
1638 24, 32
. 1638 End Called away
1924 Start
1924 25
1925 32
1932 22
1935 20, 17
1938 24
1943 27
1946 32
1947 23
1951 End Total time 33 minutes
1840 Start Officer Fink SAT AT 27015 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1843 30
1848 stop sign warning/no proof of insurance - Hamilton Road - Minnetonka
1901 27
1903 19
1905 23
1909 21
1912 28
1914 21, 33
1917 End Total time 37 minutes
/09/20 1823 start sgt. Talbot SAT AT 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1826 18
1828 32
1831 26
1832 29
1833 24
1834 24
1836 27, 29
1838 28 ..
1841 30
1842 28
1846 32
1847 26, 30
1849 21
1850 24
1854 26
1857 End Total time 34 minutes
* 1934 start Officer Fink SAT AT WEST END OF BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
1942 26
1943 25
1945 27
1951 resident - no speed
2004 End Total time 30 minutes
93/09/21 0619 Start Officer Rusch SAT AT END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
0621 28
0625 25
0626 25, 22
0628 22 .
0630 22
0631 29
0633 25, 23
0634 28
0635 27
0636 33
0642 21
0643 26, 20
0645 25
0649 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1615 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT WEST END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR - FASTEST 35 MPH
1645 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1652 Start Officer Keller SAT IN DRIVEWAY OF 27075 BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
1715 35 Speed warning issued - Pine Bend - Shorewood
1721 End Total time 29 minutes
* 1818 Start Officer Fink SAT WEST END OF BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
1821 20 .
1823 24
1825 30
1827 27, 25, 21
1828 19
1830 25
1834 38 Speed warning issued - Winstead, MN
1846 28
1850 End Total time 32 minutes
93/09/22 0834 Start Officer Keller SAT IN DRIVE AT 6045 CAJED - MARKED CAR
0858 End Called away - total time 24 minutes
* 1810 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT WEST END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR - FASTEST 32 MPH
1841 End Called away - total time 31 minutes
93/09/23 0729 Start Officer Erickson SAT AT 26380 BEVERLY - MARKED CAR
0732 24
0733 27, 24
0736 24
0738 20
0742 25, 15
0744 14, 30
0745 30
0746 21
0750 End
1424 Start SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY
1427 26
1428 31
1429 26
1430 18
1433 14
1445 End Total time 37 minutes
0910 Start Officer Keller SAT IN DRIVE AT 27075 BEVERLY - HARKED4CAR - FASTEST 33
0940 End Total time 30 minutes
1655 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT WEST END OF BEVERLY - HARKED CAR - FASTEST 34 HPH
1718 Stop sign warning issued - Smithtown Road - Shorewood
1725 End Total time 30 minutes
3/09/24 0709 Start Officer Erickson SAT AT 26830 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
0711 23
0712 28
0714 33, 30
0715 28, 28, 15, 26
0719 23
0721 28
0722 28
0723 28
0724 25
0725 End
1408 Start SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY
1413 26
1416 23, 25
1418 23
1419 28
. 1423 23
1424 24
1427 End Total time 35 minutes
* 1446 Start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1448 29
1452 29
1453 23
1454 20
1459 26
1505 28
1506 28
1508 26
1509 25, 30
1510 24
1511 27 School Bus
1513 26
1516 End Total time 30 minutes
1625 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT WEST END OF BEVERLY - HARKED CAR - FASTEST 30 HPH
~. 1655 End Total time 30 minutes
1832 Start Officer Jorgenson SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1837 22
1840 27
1841 29
1842 24
1844 22
1849 20
1852 20
1854 28
1855 21
1859 17
1902 End Total time 32 minutes
. /09/24 0937 Start Officer Fink SAT WEST END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
0938 22
0944 26
0945 20
0947 End Called away
1215 Start
1216 31
1220 22
1221 33
1222 27, 26
1225 33
1228 27
1229 25
1231 28, 28
1233 27
1237 End Total time 32 minutes
* 1642 Start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 27170 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR ..
1644 22
1645 25
1650 17
1651 24
1652 24, 34
1655 17
1656 23, 24
1657 19
1701 23
1703 22
1704 29
1706 13
1710 20
1712 End Total time 30 minutes
93/09/26 0742 Start Officer Erickson SAT AT 27125 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
0748 22
0758 33
0759 27
0804 25
0809 29 .
0812 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1336 start Officer Fink SAT WEST END OF BEVERLY - PLAIN CAR
1339 33
1342 28, 33, 32, 27
1352 24
1359 33
1401 28
1406 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1647 start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1647 24
1649 34
1651 27, 27
1654 27, 27, 25
1656 27
1657 27
1701 24
1702 24
1705 33 .
1706 30
1708 26
1711 29
1713 22
1715 30
1716 22
1717 End Total time 30 minutes
93/09/27 1653 Start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 271 70 BEVERLY - HARKED CAR
1656 25, 25
1657 28, 12
1658 25, 28
1659 28, 36
1701 31
1704 31
1705 33
1707 25
1709 27
1710 33
1712 24
1714 26
1718 20
1721 21
1722 10
1723 24
1723 End Total time 30 minutes
_~e
:'.inted september 24, 1993
:'/09/02
~;.03
.
EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD REPORT
..
Time Speed Action/Residence/Misc. Officer Comments in Capital Italics
1820 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT IN DRIVE AT 20090 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR-
ABLE TO WORK BOTH DIRECTIONS - FASTEST 38 MPH
1844 End Called away - Total time 24 minutes
1946
1949
1950
1957
1958
1959
1959
2000
2001
2002
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
2015
0654
0655
0657
0700
0701
0702
0704
0705
0706
0715
0716
0717
0718
0718
0725
0729
0733
0734
1415
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1430
1431
1432
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1440
1441
1442
1444
1445
1445
Start Officer Jorgenson SAT IN FRONT OF 19955 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
28, 31 eb
28, 21 wb - one turned Hopper Lake Rd
28 eb
22 wb
28, 33 eb
25 wb - turned Hooper Lake Rd
30 eb
32 eb
19 wb - turned Hooper Lake Rd
22 wb
22 wb - turned into church
17, 34 wb, eb
27 eb
23 wb
End Total time 29 minutes
Start
25
30, 26
29
34
24,
24,
24,
End
Start
31, 29
33, 33
33
39
24
34,32
35
End
31, 22
24
36
Called
Officer Erickson
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
away
Speed warning issued -
Total time 31 minutes
Start
27, 26
34
28
24, 24, 24
26, 26, 31
27
18
24, 19, 19
24, 24
29
27, 28, 24
33
31
30
24
32
27, 20
31
28, 25, 25
25
24
26
25
27
34
22
20, 31
End Total
Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 20185 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - PLATE t's TAKEN
wb
eb
eb
eb
eb
wb
eb
wb
wb
wb
eb, wb, wb
eb
wb
wb
wb
eb
wb, eb
wb
wb
wb
eb
wb
wb
eb
eb
wb
wb, eb
time 30 minutes
1640
1640
1714
sgt. siegfried SAT AT 20270 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
wb - Speed warning issued - Ferncroft Drive - Shorewood
Total time 34 minutes
*
Start
38
End
..
1828
1828
1829
1833
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1845
1846
1846
1847
1849
1852
1854
1855
1857
1858
Officer Jorgenson SAT UP NEAR 19955 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
Start
28
22
33, 29
38, 26, 27
30
28
28, 25
28
28
28
28,
27,
28,
32
33
29,25
29
End
*
Turned
29
26, 26
27
Hooper Lake
Total time 30 minutes
*
1931
1933
1934
1935
1937
1938
1941
1942
1943
1944
1946
1947
1948
1951
1952
1955
1955
Start
21, 21
28, 28, 27
32
27
32
30
31
31, 31
37 Speed warning issued
31
27, 21
30
29
30
30, 35
End Called away - Total time 24 minutes
Officer Keller
SAT NEAR 20050 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - CONCEAL.
BY TREES AND SHRUBBERY - MAJORITY OF TRAFFIC EASTBOUND
93/09/04
0928
0928
0929
0931
0932
0933
0935
0936
0937
0938
0940
0942
0943
0944
0948
0950
Start
31, 31
31
30
24
32, 33
34,27,34
33, 28
16, 16, 27
29
32, 32
34
24
32, 30
23
End Total
Officer Erickson
eb
eb
eb
wb
eb
eb
eb
eb
wb
eb, wb
eb
eb
wb, eb
eb
time 22 minutes
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
.
*
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1122
1131
1132
1134
1135
1136
Start
31, 31, 12
30
33,
30,
29,
31
32,
29,
24,
43
29
25, 32
30, 33
35, 29, 24
27, 23
Officer Fink
SAT AT 20185 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
95% TRAFFIC EB - CITATION TO LOCAL RESIDENT
33
31
27, 33
31
29
27
Speed
citation issued - Excelsior Blvd. - Shorewood
*
*
.
*.
93/09/06
1139
1140
1140
1640
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1651
1652
1653
1654
1656
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1725
1729
1729
1730
1731
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1738
1739
1741
1742
1743
1744
1747
1748
1750
1751
1753
1755
1813
1814
1815
1818
1822
1823
1826
1827
1829
1833
1834
1835
1837
1839
1843
1844
1845
1018
1021
1026
1029
1030
1031
1033
1034
1035
1036
1039
30, 28, 29, 32
28
End Total time 30 minutes
..
sgt. Talbot SAT AT 20300 EXCELSl"OR BLVD.. - HARKED CAR - PLATE t's TAKEN
eb
eb
eb,
eb,
eb,
eb
wb. eb. eb
eb
wb
wb
wb
wb
eb
wb
eb
Called away - Total time 22 minutes
Start
30
28
28,
30,
26,
32
27,30,29
29
25
27, 26
26
28
32
25, 20, 30
26
End
wb, wb
wb
wb
36, 22
21
32
start Officer Neururer SAT AT CHURCH ENTRANCB - HARKED CAR - 11 ALSO LEFT CHURCH
29
29 went to Church
26
29, 30
28
25, 23, 29
25, 25, 30
24 went to Church
29
21 eb from Hooper Lake
31
25
21
27,24,24
32, 25, 30
34, 34
34, 26
31, 31
27, 15, 29
32
26, 30
End Total time 30 minutes
start Officer Jorgenson SAT IN FRONT OF 20380 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
23
26, 29
27
28
33
29
28
24
28
28, 34
23, 30
21, 24
32
30
31
End Total time 32 minutes
start
46 Speed
30
31
29
31
28
34, 29
31
31, 30
33
Officer Rusch
citation issued
eb
eb
eb
eb
eb
wb, eb
eb
eb
eb
SAT AT 20050 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - .MARKED CAR
- Weeks Road - Greenwood
1041 29, 30 eb
1042 32 eb
1043 33, 18, 30, 30 eb, wb, wb, eb ole
1046 29 wb
1048 28 eb
1048 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1630 Start Sgt. Talbot SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKBD CAR - PLATZ tis TAKEN
1632 21, 29, 28, 29 wb, wb, eb, eb
1633 25 eb
1634 21 eb
1635 21, 21 eb, wb
1638 23, 19 wb, eb
1639 31 eb
1641 28, 28 eb
1643 18 eb
1646 33 wb
1647 29, 34 wb
1650 29, 33, 34 eb, wb, wb
1652 30 eb
1656 32 wb
1657 31 wb
1658 28, 29 wb, eb
1659 27 wb .
1700 32 wb
1700 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1847 Start Officer Fink SAT IN DRIVEWAY OP 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
1825 30
1826 30, 29
1827 32
1829 25
1830 27
1831 30, 26
1832 32
1834 28
1835 28
1836 28, 34
1839 31
1840 30
1843 29, 34
1845 28, 31
1847 36
1847 End Called away .
1908 Start
1910 26, 30
1911 28
1912 33, 24, 27
1913 34
1915 30
1916 30
1917 29
1918 34
1918 End Total time 32 minutes
93/09/06 0918 Start Officer Rusch SAT AT 20050 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
0919 22 eb
0921 31 eb
0922 31 eb
0923 28, 33, 32 eb
0925 35, 34 eb
0926 30 eb
0927 35 eb
0928 35, 36 eb
0929 33, 32 eb
0930 24 wb
0931 33 eb
0932 31 eb
0933 31 eb
0933 38 eb - Speed warn & seat belt citation issued - Suburban Dr. - Shorewood
0935 41 eb - Speed citation issued - Omaha, Nebraska
0941 42 eb - Speed citation issued - Pond Ridge Cr. - Wayzata
0951 24 eb
0953 End Total time 35 minutes
*
*
.
*
93'107
*
1337
1337
1338
1341
1342
1344
1347
1348
1351
1353
1357
1605
1606
1607
1608
1613
1617
1618
1619
1621
1622
1623
1626
1627
1628
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1635
1830
1830
1832
1834
1843
1844
1845
1850
1856
1900
1900
0759
0759
0800
0801
0802
0803
0804
0805
0806
0807
0808
0809
0810
0811
0812
0814
0815
0817
0818
0819
0821
0822
0824
0825
0826
0827
0829
0829
SAT AT 20270 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
Start
24
24
20, 26
24
26
32
38,
33,
26,
End
Officer Erickson
wb
eb
wb, eb
wb
wb
wb
24 wb
27 wb
33 wb
Called away - Total time 20 minutes
Start
29
30
29
32, 28, 28
28, 14
20,31
28, 27
25, 31
27, 28
28, 21
29
31
34
27
28
24
31, 25
24
End Total
Start
24
26
38
30
33
29
40
31,
34,
End
.
sgt. Talbot SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - PLATE I's TAKeN
wb
eb
wb
eb
eb, wb
wb, eb
eb, wb
wb, eb
wb
wb
eb
eb
eb
wb
eb
wb
wb, eb
wb
time 30 minutes
Officer Fink
SAT BY 20185 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR - HOST EB
Speed warning issued - Northwood Pkwy - New Hope
Speed
31
31, 31
Total
Start
28, 25
30
35, 28
23, 25, 25,
27, 35
31, 30, 35
34
29
27, 21
31
33,
33,
28,
32
30, 30, 31,
25, 26
33
27
32
17,
32,
35,
30
30,27
29, 29
27
End
30
25, 25,
26, 30
13
30
29, 28
1633 start
Total
citation issued - Idlewild Path - Shorewood
time 30 minutes
Officer Rusch
eb
eb
wb, eb
20 eb, wb, eb, eb
eb
eb, wb. eb
eb
eb
eb, wb
wb
wb,
25,
eb,
eb
22, 25
wb, eb
eb
eb
eb
wb school bus, eb school bus
wb, eb
eb, eb, wb
eb
eb, wb
eb
eb
time 30 minutes
SAT BY 20050 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
eb
33
wb, eb
eb
eb, eb, wb, eb, eb
Sgt. Siegfried
SAT AT 20270 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKeD CAR - FASTEST 34
1704 End Total time 31 minutes
* 1832 Start Officer Fink PARKED AT 20185 EXCBLSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR - 50\ BB/WB
1833 36 .
1834 34, 30
1836 31
1839 18, 26
1840 29, 28
1841 26
1842 26
1843 28, 30
1844 31, 25
1845 24
1846 30, 30
1848 29, 26
1849 25
1850 28
1852 36
1853 33, 36
1854 28
1856 35, 30
1857 32, 29
1859 29, 26, 25
1902 18
1902 End Total time 30 minutes .
93/09/08 1419 Start Officer Keller SAT AT 20185 EXCBLSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
1419 29 eb
1420 20, 28 eb, wb
1421 30 eb
1422 30, 33 wb, eb
1424 20, 20, 29 wb
1425 29 wb
1426 21, 21, 25, 26 eb
1428 31, 34 wb, eb
1429 28 eb
1430 31, 31 wb
1432 26, 26 eb
1433 29, 31, 28 eb, wb, wb
1435 25 eb
1436 29, 29, 37 wb
1437 25, 25 eb
1438 31, 29 eb
1439 28 eb
1440 27, 27 wb .
1442 28, 37 eb, wb
1444 33, 37 wb, eb
1445 28 eb
1446 27 wb
1448 32 wb
1449 27 wb
1449 End Total time 30 minutes
* 1340 Start Officer Rusch SAT AT 20090 EXCBLSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
1341 31, 32 eb (dump truck), wb
1342 26, 24 wb, eb
1344 31 wb
1345 32 wb
1346 23 wb-dt
1347 27 wb
1348 27 wb
1350 25 eb
1351 22, 24 wb
1352 27 wb
1355 20, 20 wb
1356 27 eb
1358 33, 24, 26 wb, eb-dt, eb-dt
1359 25, 26, 32 wb, eb, wb
1401 21, 21 eb-dt, eb
1402 29 eb-dt
1403 27, 32, 27 eb-dt, eb, wb
1404 32 eb
1405 24, 29 eb
1406 29, 26, 31 eb, eb, wb
1407 33 wb
1408
1409
1410
1410
24
31,
32
End
eb-dt
31, 29 eb, wb, eb
wb
Total time 30 minutes
..
* 1713 Start sgt. Siegfried SAT AT 20270 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - FASTEST 35
_ LOTS OF TRUCK TRAFFIC - RECEIVED A COMPLAINT FROM A LADY WHO THOGUHT THE TRUCK TRAFFIC SHOULD NOT BE USING EXCELSIOR
BLVD. BECAUSE OF THE KIDS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SHE WAS ADVISED THAT WE WERE MONITORING THE AREA AND THE TRUCKS WERE
TRAVELING SLOWLY. SHE WAS ALSO TOLD THERE WAS NOTHING THE POLICE COULD DO. IT WAS A PUBLIC ROAD AND SHE SHOULC
CONTACT THE CITY OFFICES TOMORROW IF SHE HAD ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
1745 End Total time 32 minutes
*
.
93/09/09
.
*
*
1858
1859
1900
1901
1902
1903
1906
1907
1908
1909
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1919
1920
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1930
0723
0723
0724
0725
0727
0728
0730
0731
0732
0733
0735
0735
0747
0749
0750
0751
0752
0754
0754
1432
1433
1434
1436
1438
1439
1441
1442
1442
1526
1526
1530
1531
1533
1534
1535
start Officer Jorgenson MARKED CAR
29
21, 27
27
24, 30
25, 28
31, 25
27
29, 17, 26
30, 25
30
22
31
25, 20
26, 30, 29
27, 25
32, 24
25, 30
31, 28
31
22
20
30
25
End Total time 31 minutes
Start
28, 28
32, 31, 30
26
29
33, 32
34
34
28
28
33
38
33, 25
30, 34
33, 33
31
28
28
End Total
Officer Erickson SAT AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
eb, wb
eb
eb
eb
eb
eb
eb
wb
eb
eb
eb - Speed warning issued - Hopkins
eb, wb
eb
eb
eb
eb
eb
time 31 minutes
Erickson SAT WEST END OF AREA - HARKED CAR
Start
29, 21
27, 25
29, 20
27
31
26, 31
27
End
Officer
wb
wb. eb
eb, wb
wb
eb
eb
wb
Called away -
Total time 10 minutes
Start Officer Keller
29, 29, 34
24
26
24, 35
22
31, 30
SAT AT 20195 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - WE ONLY
*
1621 Start Sgt. Siegfried
1652 End Total time 31 minutes
SAT NEAR 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR -FASTEST 34
1537 37, 27, 24
1538 33, 31, 31
1540 27, 27, 33 ...
1541 27, 25
1542 26, 25
1544 27
1546 39 Speed warning - seat belt citation - Idlewild Path - Shorewood
1554 34
1555 31
1556 34
1556 End Total time 30 minutes
*
1816
1816
1817
1818
1819
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1830
1831
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1840
1841
1842
93/09/10
0740
0740
0741
0742
0744
0746
0751
0752
0754
0755
0756
0757
0757
0805
0808
0808
*
1450
1455
1455
1516
1521
Start Officer Jorgenson SAT NEAR 20380 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
28
31, 30
28
26
30
24
30
25
32, 30
22, 25
25, 27
32, 29
30, 24
32
28
24
29
32, 27
34, 39
25
31
End Called away - total time 26 minutes
.
Start
32, 31
31, 33,
25
28,
38
31,
31,
23
32, 28
28
34
45
28,
36
End
Officer Erickson
eb
26 eb
eb
wb, eb
warning issued - St. Albans Green - Greenwood
eb
eb
eb
eb, wb
eb.
eb
eb - Speed citation issued - late for school - Chickadee La - Deephaven
25 eb
Speed warning issued - Driving after suspension citation issued _
arrested for four outstanding traffic warrants - Rustic Way - Shorewood
Total time 28 minutes (tied up on above arrest for 57 minutes)
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
27
Speed
29, 30
28
.
Start Officer Keller SAT IN FRONT OF 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
42 Speed citation issued - Vine Ridge Road - Shorewood
Same car as above - warning - window tint violation
22
End Total time 31 minutes
* 1635 Start Sgt. Siegfried SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
1650 38 Speed warning issued - Shady Lane South - Minnetonka
1705 39 Speed warning issued - St. Albans Bay Road - Shorewood
1714 End Total time 39 minutes
* 1910 Start Officer Jorgenson SAT AT 20380 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD - HARKED CAR
1911 29
1912 28
1914 28, 22, 29
1915 23
1918 29, 25
1921 22, 29
93/09/11
*
.
~.
93/09/12
1922
1923
1925
1926
1927
1929
1930
1931
1937
1940
1941
1944
1431
1440
1544
1607
1620
1620
1622
1623
1624
1626
1627
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1648
1651
1651
1750
1751
1753
1754
1758
1759
1801
1802
1804
1807
1808
1810
1817
1818
1819
1820
1630
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1636
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
30
31,
32
28
25
30,
28,
28,
28
23
27
End
25, 26
30, 25
30
24
.
Total time 34 minutes
start
End
start
End
Officer Fink
Called away
SAT AT 20100 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - MARKED CAR - WEDDING AT
CHURCH - PASTEST 37
Total time 32 minutes
start
26,27,29
34, 26, 28,
29, 28, 24
25, 25, 29,
32, 36, 26,
28
30, 27, 21
36
23, 23, 24,
26, 20, 31
27, 19, 21
26, 26, 26
31, 25
20, 21, 27,
25, 25
23
30, 22
29, 30
28
31, 23, 29,
30, 29
35
25
33
25
End Total
.Start
29
31, 31
28
30, 24, 24
36
36
31
35, 35, 30
30
24,
44
33,
25,
37
End
29
Speed
33, 30,
31
Talbot
SAT AT 20185 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - MARKED CAR
sgt.
wb
28
wb,
eb
26,
eb
wb
eb
34
wb,
eb,
wb
eb,
26
wb
eb
eb,
eb
wb
35
eb,
eb
eb
wb
wb
time
eb, wb, eb, eb
eb, eb
26, 25 eb, eb, wb, wb, wb, wb
wb, wb, wb, eb
eb, eb
wb, wb
wb
wb, eb, wb, wb
wb
wb, wb, eb, eb
wb
31 minutes
Officer Keller
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
citation issued - stoneybrook Court - Minnetonka
36
Total time 30 minutes
start
23
25, 26
33
23, 23,
28, 33
33, 28,
25, 26
29, 27,
28, 22,
22, 28,
28, 27,
Officer Erickson SAT AT 20090 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
eb
eb, wb
eb
26, 20 wb, wb, eb, eb
eb
30, 30 eb, eb, wb, eb
wb, eb
24 eb, wb, eb
27 eb, wb, eb
31 eb
25, 27, 29 eb, wb, wb, wb, eb
1643
1644
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1657
1704
93/09/13
1705
1708
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1720
1721
1722
1723
1725
1726
1727
1729
1730
1731
1732
1734
1735
1736
1736
1828
1830
1835
*
1847
1848
1849
1850
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1859
1900
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
93/09/14
1644
1650
1715
*
1839
1844
1846
1848
1857
1858
29,
30,
28,
34
32,
34,
28,
30
31,
34
29,
28,
21,
39
End
26
25, 34
23, 23,
33
34, 27,
26
27, 26
24, 30,
29, 27
30
Total
Start
21
30
30
28, 29, 28,
25, 27
35, 24
24, 27, 27,
22
25, 28, 26,
30, 34, 31,
26, 27, 24
29, 24
36, 27, 27,
36
28, 28
34, 32, 20,
28, 36, 27
27, 28
24, 32, 33,
26, 27, 30,
30, 24
23
22, 20, 24
End Total
wb,
eb
22,
eb
eb
26
eb,
eb
eb
wb
28
eb,
wb
wb -
time
eb
33, 34, 34
wb, wb, wb, eb, eb, eb, eb
.
eb
wb
eb, eb, wb, wb
wb, wb
Speed warning issued - Oak Street - Excelsior
34 minutes
Sgt. Talbot
eb
wb
wb
27
eb
wb
28, 27
wb
28
24
eb,
wb
18
wb
wb
27, 32
wb
wb,
34
30
wb,
eb
wb, eb, eb
time 31 minutes
SAT AT 20090 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
wb, eb, wb, wb
eb, eb, eb, wb, wb
.
eb, wb, wb, wb
eb, wb, eb, eb
eb, wb
wb, eb, eb, eb
wb, wb, eb, wb, wb
eb
eb,
eb,
eb
wb, wb, wb
wb, wb, wb
Start Officer Fink SAT IN DRIVEWAY OP 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
31, 24 .
41 Speed citation issued - same car as below - Lake Benton, MN
Warnings for No DL, No Insurance, Tinted Windows
28, 33
32
31
28
27,31,30
30
28
34
36
19
30
31
26, 24
33
27, 27
36, 30
End Total time 38 minutes
Start
38
End
Sgt. Siegfried
Speed warning issued
Total time 31 minutes
SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
Manor Road - Shorewood
Start Officer Fink SAT IN DRIVE AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
27, 31, 32, 31, 26
31, 27
39 Speed warning issued - Excelsior Blvd. - Shorewood
30, 25, 31, 31
25
1900 31
1901 26
1902 17 ...
1903 24
1904 29, 21
190E 27, 27
1902 22
1905 26, 26
1910 34
1911 26
1912 24, 27
1913 29, 27
1916 28
1917 30
1918 29
1915 35
1920 30
1921 34
1922 25, 26
1924 End Total time 30 minutes
3/09/17 0709 start Officer Erickson SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXC:ELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
0709 27 eb
0710 25, 28 eb
0710 42 Speed citation issued - Excelsior Blvd. - Shorewood
0712 34, 27 eb
. 0713 26, 26 eb
0714 25 wb
0715 34 eb
0715 38 Speed warning issued - Highview Place - Greenwood
0724 30 eb
0726 24, 30, 28, 29 wb, eb, eb, eb
0727 30 eb
0728 30 eb
0729 31 eb
0730 31, 31 eb
0731 34 eb
0732 28 eb
0733 28, 33 eb
0734 34, 31, 31, 31 eb
0735 32, 28, 26 eb
0736 29 eb
0737 31 eb
0738 24, 25, 27 eb
0741 24, 25, 27, 34 eb
0742 30 eb
. 0744 32 eb
0745 30, 32, 24 eb, eb, wb
0746 32, 33 eb
0748 38 Speed warning issued - Park Street - Shorewood
0757 28, 33, 30 eb
0758 37 Speed warning issued - Hillcrest Road - Deephaven
0807 29, 29 eb
0808 29, 30, 30 eb
0809 26, 26, 33 eb
0810 34, 35 eb
0811 25, 25, 29 eb
0814 29 eb
0816 35 eb
0817 24 eb
0818 29 eb
0818 End Total time 69 minutes
1902
1903
1904
1906
1908
1911
1913
1914
1915
1915
93/09/15
1630
1700
*
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1847
1848
1850
1851
1853
1854
1856
1857
1858
1859
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1906
1907
1908
1909
1914
93/09/16
0657
0658
0700
0701
0702
0704
0705
0706
0707
0709
0710
0712
0714
0715
0717
0718
0721
0723
0724
0725
0726
0727
0727
*
1625
1650
1700
*
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
30, 24, 25
28, 31, 29, 20
27
27, 32
28, 32
30, 30
32, 34, 27, 31
26, 31, 24
22
End Total time 36 minutes
Start sgt. Siegfried
End Total time 30 minutes
..
SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR - FASTEST 33
start Officer Jorgenson SAT AT 20380 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
24, 27
35, 26
25, 26, 31
30, 27
30
30
32
33
29, 32
24, 26
29, 20
27, 26
29
32, 27
29
27
30
28
27, 24
29
29, 30
22
29
24
End Total time 34 minutes
Start Officer Erickson
30, 25 eb
34, 32 eb
34 eb
25 eb
34 eb
31, 32 eb
34 eb
33 eb
25, 30, 30, 30, 30 eb
32, 34 eb
34 eb
30 eb
25 eb
32 eb
25 eb
30 eb
31, 28 eb
28, 26 wb, eb
25 wb-dt
29 eb
28 eb
End Total time 30 minutes
start
39
End
SAT IN DRIVEWAY AT 20030 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
sgt. Siegfried SAT AT 20300 EXCELSIOR BLVD. - PLAIN CAR
Speed warning issued - Baywood Shore Dr. - Mound
Total time 35 minutes
Officer Jorgenson SAT IN 20000 BLOCK EXCELSIOR BLVD. - HARKED CAR
start
24,29
24
32, 33
29,28
26 31
.
.
.
.
. .
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
IV.
N
II v
FROM:
James c. Hurm, City Administrator
DATE:
October 6, 1993
RE:
Review of Headway in Meeting Objectives
This is the October review of headway in meeting objectives we set
for ourselves for 1993 in our budget adopted last December. The
number "I" is the status given last July. The number "2" is the
current status if changed from the July review. In January you will
receive a final review of the 1993 objectives. Please feel free to
ask questions on this report before or during the Council meeting.
This should point out how important the objectives are that are
listed in the proposed 1994 budget document. We will be reporting
to the Council in July and October of next year and in January of
1995 on the status of measurable objectives established in the 1994
operating budget document. This is a major policy function of the
City Council so review the proposed 1994 objectives in the proposed
1994 budget document for additions, changes or deletions.
JHjtln
10693.1
'(J
.
.
Key:
1 = 1st Review (done in July)
2 = 2nd Review (done in October)
3 = Final Review (January of following year)
>, I
.-; 0 I
~/'aJ .j.J Z/
aJ ~~ ~ ~!
-'< ,,...r ,
"<-I i aJ ~ /
'-;""1 <<S,.., -'< -() ,I
0\ I "<-I
:'00\/ :.;g{.-; aJ I
Z I C:'""1j aJ'""j -0 1
ff Ic:ra,~ 3,~' 8,..,; ~I
ra :::: 0\ I ::::
(]J /01'0 c:'O 0]0\ 0'
:., aJ (]J '<-I (]J , '0-/ '""1 .:::
-0'::: 01.::: i 0]
aJ 0 (]Jo,aJc: (]J
> O]ra -Oral>'o-/ ...
-0-/ (]J -0-/ ...
t .2:., B l.,~ t df ~I
aJ aJ (]Je 0
-,..., -'<-0 -'< (]J ',..., '"' (]J
-0 :., l.,-O-OaJ-"'"
o ~o 000-0 8
.j.J ~4.J
REVIEW OF CITY OBJECTIVES FOR THE YEAR 1993
DATE: OCTOBER 1993
Mayor & Council:
Televise all City Council meetings 1
Inform citizens through quarterly City 1
newsletters
Enhance intergovernmental relations & 1
cooperation by supporting "Optimum" study
Support an effort to establish senior housing 1 2
within the City
Undertake a meaningful goal setting session 1
during the first 60 days of 1993
Administrator:
Develop and implement a citizen survey to 1
annually measure service satisfaction
(customer satisfaction audit)
Update comparable worth pay plan* 1
Provide an orientation session for Council 1
and Commission members
Begin negotiations for a 1994-95 AFSCME 1
agreement
Take a leadership role in intergovernmental 1
cooperative efforts in the Lake Minnetonka
area
Implement a process to quarterly review City 2 1 I
objectives
Introduce a merit element to the City's pay 1
plan system*
Coordinate implementation of Senior Task 1 2
Force recommendations
Monitor the cost of engineering services and 2 1
update recommendations for a city Engineer
position
I; I f I: I g !
1.-: It-< -I I C;
1::;:;;I"'~I! IB
'1:1 0'11 :... ~ -I I ill
" C~/.~ I"'
p if1 ~ .;.J 1-'-' -
...... ...:t1 - 0 u
: ;,;; ;:loc1 g
:... ill aJ ...., ill ' ...., '-I .c
..o.c 01- Cll
Key: (JJ (J aJ(j <!Jc; ill
> 1J)if1..orcr >...., >
1 = 1st Review (done in July) ...., ill ....,
.-.; if1, Oill-,-, -;
2 = 2nd Review (done in October) o .c;';-,-,:"'o~.u
(JJ aJ ille 0
3 = Final Review (January of following year) .~ ";:..0 ..;: (!] .~- ill
..0 :... :.....Q..o (JJ .,...,
o ~o 000..0/6
.I-J 3:.-.;
Municipal Building - City Hall:
Paint entryway area and other office area, 1
where necessary
Purchase and install cabinet doors for office 1 I
service counters
Protecti ve Inspection: I
Increase and enhance public information 1
through the development of at least two
handouts relative to building codes
Draft an article for each ne'Ils1etter 1
Explore joint inspection possibilities with 1
adjoining communities
Computerize building permits and permit 1 12
tracking
City Engineer:
Keep construction project files up to date 1 I
and accurate
Provide construction budgets for capital 1
improvement programming and budgeting
Communicate in written form to affected 1
residents at least two (2) times during a
construction project
Keep change orders at less than 5% of 1
original contract amount
I I
Public Works Service: I I
Perform preventative maintenance on all 1
equipment within 100 miles or 10 hours of
scheduled service
I Have City personnel perform 90% of City 1 I
building repairs ad preventative maintenance
.
.
Key:
lIst Review (done in July)
2 2nd Review (done in October)
3 Final Review (January of following year)
:>.,
;r,/.a; .3 v
-:;./.:; :>., 1J,
.:; I ~ a; /g
....,,,, <<J ~ -. I
0"\ ;;;...., ~I i
'00"\/ "0"\"'" <ll I
v c...., 'lI...., .0 I
tJJ i'11 ..LJ ,.LJ
..c.l c1rac; O!"O
CJ .''- -""'" J ""'-f C...,., I ,....,
rrJ ! =' ...., G\!::: /
<ll '0.'01 c'O.I1lG\/ 52 /
i~;_<ll~ff I if I.i""'~; 11/1
.u ..:;" 0- l.u.u .u
CJ .u"/CJ<v CJ
.~ ~j ~ <v/.~e: <V
.0 ,\" ...o.o<v''''''
01&00010.0 6
I .J.J ~..u
.
Genera~ Governmen t :
Fully implement computerized Clerks index 1
relating to minutes of Council proceedings
and other records
Maintain an up-to-date microfilm history of 1
City records
Have City Code books updated twice annually 1
I Complete City Clerk Certification Program 1
I
(Deputy Clerk)
Finance:
Implement new budget format and enhance for 1
1994 budget year
Prepare CAFR for submittal to GFOA 1 I
certificate of Excellence Program
Implement new chart of accounts 2
Provide monthly reports to staff, quarterly 1
reports to Council
I Invest available City funds in accordance 1
I with state statutes to maintain the safety
and liquidity of funds and achieve the
highest reasonable return
Investigate alternative financing sources to 1
reduce percentage of property taxes to total
revenue
Professiona~ Services: I
contain costs on contracted professional 1
services
P~anning & Zoning:
Update the City Comprehensive Plan 1 2
Update the City Subdivision Ordinance 1
Enhance administrative procedures 1
Start an elderly housing project 1 I
Complete the automation of property records 1 2 I
Resolution of Rental Housing Code 1
.
Key:
1 = 1st Review (done in July)
2 = 2nd Review (done in October)
3 = Final Review (January of following year)
;>., 0
; I.g ':
~ ..... ....
..., I I])
-1..,.., ~ l"1 .~
!-og{/, l.i~ .....
? /~~ :JP"-1 tl I
I C,lf1c C '.....
(J IC'''' ........, ""'1-
If1 ,- ,GI, i5
<lJ 10,-0 C-olIl]GI' ~
l.i '1])1]) ...,I]);...,.....lai
I~~ Ol~, /
I]) -(J I])Q/~CI aJ
:> Ill] 1f1..Q1f1 ...,/:>
;i h:2 ~ 0 :..]/;i.I.J I :;j
() - .I.J () aJl ()
aJ aJ aJ aJ;:: aJ
.,.., ~..Q ~..Q .,.., - .,..,
..Q l.i l.i ..Q aJ ..0
o !!20 00 O..o{' 0
i......I.J ~-".J
streets & Roadways: I
Develop a pavement management system to aid 1
in scheduling of street projects
,
Paint crosswalks and lane markings at half 2 1
the existing locations each year - creating a
2-year cycle (heavily traveled streets I I
annually)
Sweep each City street at least once annually 1 ,
Mow roadsides at least twice annually 1
Mow boulevards at least 6 times annually 1 I
Visually inspect storm drainage grates 1 I
.
annually and repair as needed
I
Snow & Ice Removal: I I
Remove snow and ice and complete salt/sand 1
operations within 12 hours after the end of a
snow event
Complete widening and clean. up functions 1 I I
within 48 hours of a snow event
I
Sanitation/Waste Rmv/Weeds: r
Resolve all property cleanup complaints 1
Resolve 100% of weed complaints 1
I I
Tree Maintenance: I I
Remove 100% of diseased trees on public 1 I
property
Respond to all property owner requests to 1 I
identify diseased trees
Maintain and trim trees on City property 1 I I I I
which present a hazard to public II
.
.
Key:
1 1st Review (done in July)
2 2nd Review (done in October)
3 Final Review (January of following year)
....
(J
III
ill
l..,
(jJ
ill
::.
....
.w
(J
ill
.,...,
~
o
.
Parks & Recreation:
Resurface the Equivalent of one tennis court 1
per year
Build inventory of and replace 5 picnic 1 I
tables per year
I Plant at least 10 trees per year 1
Identify excess park lands, if any, which may 1
be sold and reinvested in park development
continue improvement of Silverwood Park 1 2
Fully implement Park Capital Improvement 1 2
Program by successfully undertaking a bond
referendum
Water:
Supply a safe, clean uninterrupted source of 1 2
water to all connections
Study the feasibility of decommissioning 2 1
Badger and Woodhaven wells
Explore possibility of interconnecting with 1
other communities
I
Sanitary Sewer: I
Work with MWCC to correct inflow and 1
infiltration into the sanitary sewer system
Work with MWCC to reduce sewage treatment 1 2
costs to the city
Recycling: I
continue weekly pickup of recyclable 1
materials
Increase program participation through use of 2
incentives
Hold Curbside pickup of household and yard 1
I wastes in the Spring of the year
Provide a leaf and yard waste disposal site 2 1 I
in Fall of the year
.
,
.
.
~
Meetinq Aqenda - October 1, 1993
city of Shorewood and MWCC
I. Summary of previous meeting
II. Explanation of metering calculations, as requested, by MWCC
III. MWCC Proposal
IV. Other Proposals
V. Other Discussion
VI. Conclusion
-summary of this meeting
-requirements for next meeting, if needed
-establish next meeting date, if needed
jI j/'
.
.
..
Meetinq Notes-September 20, 1993
city of Shorewood and MWCC
In attendance:
Louis Clark, Chair MWCC
Jack Irving, Commissioner MWCC
Teri Keegan, Staff MWCC
Jim Hurm, City Administrator - Shorewood
Barbara Brancel, Mayor - Shorewood
Rob Daugherty, Council Member - Shorewood
Joel Dressal, Engineer - Shorewood
Lou Clark provided an introduction including information on
current fiscal matters, and the cost allocation system - past and
present. In the original cost allocation system, costs were not
the same for each community.. Instead, there were 7 service areas
which paid a different rate per MG. All treatment costs were
shared by the 7 areas, however interceptor costs allocated to the
area in which they were located. 1992 was the first year where all
communities paid a uniform rate per MG, ie., now everyone pays
equally for interceptor costs regardless of their location.
A question was raised regarding the incentive for the Commission to
run more efficiently. Basically, even though the officials are not
elected, the Board and Chair set the direction for staff and the
communities play a large role by providing input, such as budget
breakfasts. Lou indicated that the top 4 concerns of communities
were meeting environmental standards, avoiding cost spikes, long
term cost containment, and short-term cost containment.
There was discussion on the cost allocation study. The scope of
the study did not include changing the basic concept of allocating
costs based on flow. MWCC stated that is because the law is very
clear that flow must be used as the basis. There was discussion on
the current system and the "actual at a lag" system - the two most
popular alternatives.
Shorewood indicated that they were disappointed in how their
proposal was treated. Further, that if refined, this concept would
be accepted by many/most communities. One possibility noted is to
do just that, and request comment from communities. If many/most
communities felt it was a better alternative, the Commission and
Council may re-think their policies??
Shorewood then discussed their concerns. Basically, there is the
short term issue of the 1993 billings, and a long term issue of the
cost allocation system and its effect on Shorewood.
The basic issue of Shorewood is fairness.
The payment plan was also discussed. Shorewood indicated that Lou
Clark had on several attempts tried creative solutions, such as
this, which were not acceptable to staff. The MWCC indicated that
this was still an option. Shorewood indicated that if interest was
imposed, it would not be an attractive option.
.
..
It was stated that because of the unmetered flows the MWCC "actualll
is meaningless. A comparison was made of treatment costs per
household, with Shorewood paying much more per household than other
communities.
There was questions regarding the PACE study.
The City would like to see how the flows are calculated because
there is some concern on whether the flow is actually there. The
MWCC will provide these worksheets at next meeting.
There was a question about the error range. The MWCC will provide
information.
Shorewood also has a concern about past history. It was stated
that they have done everything the MWCC indicated they should do,
yet therfbills are still increasing. They can no longer afford to
spend the $25,000 per year on sewer improvements. .
Shorewood stated that the problems have existing for many years and
the big issue is still unresolved. They have not been treated
fairly and the MWCC has not adequately addressed or resolved the
problem.
Shorewood also stated concerns regarding the situation this year in
which the MWCC originally said theDewas 1/1 in one area of the
City, did an emergency repair, then later changed the findings.
The MWCC numbers are perceived as moving targets. The MWCC
provided an explanation of this situation.
The City also stated that the statute allows for and actually
directs the Commission to establish alternative methods when there
is an unfair or inequitable situation for a community. Shorewood
feels this is the case.
It was decided that as a first step, the MWCC would provide the
detail behind the flow calculations at the next meeting.
',"
.
.
..
city of Shorewood/MWCC situation
The situation:
The City of Shorewood has not paid the 1993 monthly sewer service
invoices in full. Pursuant to statute 473.521 subd. 4, the
Commission has requested the Metropolitan Council to implement a
deficiency tax levy, for the amount in arrears plus interest at 6
percent, if the amount in arrears is not paid by a specified date.
The Goal:
To avoid a tax levy while complying with the law.
The Issues:
Although the city of Shorewood has expressed concern over several
issues, there seems to be two key issues:
I. In the short-term, the City believes subdivision 8 of Minnesota
statute 473.517 constitutes direction to the MWCC to change the
amount due from the City because it is unreasonable and/or
inequitable. Specifically, this subdivision reads..
Subd. 8. Alternative methods of allocating costs. When
it shall appear that the costs established pursuant to
the provisions of subdivisions 1 to 7 shall result in an
increased cost to a municipality or service area which is
now being serviced by the facilities of the Minneapolis-
st. Paul Sanitary District or by the facilities of any
other municipality or sewer district is unreasonable or
inequitable, the commission is hereby authorized and
directed to adopt such other means and methods of
allocating costs, as to each of them, as may be fair,
reasonable and equitable.
MWCC believes the charge is reasonable and equitable. The system
provides incentive to reduce flows. Further, the MWCC believes
that to shift costs allocated to Shorewood to another community
would be unreasonable and inequitable. In fact, this would be in
direct violation of the same statute sections 1-7.
The point of contention:
equitable.
The definition of reasonable and
The Proposal:
To allow the customer communities the opportunity to address and
define what is unreasonable and what is inequitable. This could be
done via a survey, or a public meeting, or an advisory committee as
described in subd. 9 of the same statute.
,
...
~
II. In the long-term, the City believes the current method of
allocating costs is unfair. The MWCC's position is that Minnesota
law is very clear on how costs will be allocated. Subdivision 2 of
statute 473.517 reads..
Except as provided in subdivision 3, the current costs of
all treatment works and interceptors in the metropolitan
disposal system shall be allocated among and paid by all
local government units which will discharge sewage,
directly or indirectly, into the metropolitan disposal
system during the budget year, in proportion to the total
volume estimated to be so discharged by each local
government unit, adjusted as follows:...
.
The City of Shorewood believes that the cost to treat the portion
of 1/1 that is not cost effective to eliminate should be shared by
all communities.
The point of contention: The law. It
costs allocated to each community are
proportionate share of wastewater flow.
is very clear that the
to be based on their
The Proposal:
To allow the customer communities the opportunity to suggest a law
change. This would be accomplished similar to the above issue: by
survey, public meeting(s), or advisory committee. The voices of ..
the 105 customer communities are probably the strongest influence
of the MWCC and Metropolitan Council. If there was a consensus
that it would serve the region best to allocate costs in a
different way, the MWCC would be more likely to assist in and
support a legislative change (than if just a few communities share
the belief) .
I'
TO:
Fi=l.OM:
SUBJECT:
.
.
~'O"=:: ':'C:...ll i=,;=:j'~ "1F:_=. i-'-:f'-j
,-, 1 ._-
, ....
~\
~
Post-ltr~ brand fax rransm:ttal memo 7671 I. 01 pag~" q
-r: / !,rom-r ~ L
o J I n-> J/.{.J />'YJ -.J 0
Co.
:0r'letro poll t2.n
\iVaste Control
Commission
C{,.
Phone ~
Dept.
11
Record
Fax;t ~A'74_ol
F:x ,.
Donald Blun~
Metering and the Shorewood Met~r M~41S
The Minnesota State Statues recuire the Conunission to bill all
communities in pro~o~tion of their flow as compared to the total
flow within the-MefropOlitan Disposal System. Attached is a copy
of the Statue. '
This iS,done by placing mete~s within the Co~~issionls interceptor
system at the corporate 1imi ts of the. com."'Quni ties. This allows the
Co~~ission to monitor the flows leaying one community and entering
anot~er. There are also S2 of our 105 co~~unities that have flows
leaving one community and entering the downstrea~ co~~unity
unmet~red_ This ,happens when the area serv~d within the upstream
commuhity is too small to be accurately metered.
Fi.::-st, wetll di~,;::u:ss how mete~s work and thus, how metered flows
are assigned to the communities. There are two basic types of
meters; gravity meters and 9~essure meters. Gravity meters are
those that are constructed within a gravity trunk sewer and are
generally eithe.~ flumes or weirs. Pressure meters are constructed
within forcemain systems or siphons and are generally magnetic flo~
enters or Venturi meters.
The most common meters within our system are Parshall Flumes and
' !l1agnetic Flow Meters. The Parshall Plume is the type of meter used
to measure the Shorewood flow at Meter M-415. The Parshall Flume
creates a rectangular cross sec~ion. within the ~i~e with a known
velocity. The height of the water going through the rec~anqle is
measured and converted to flow. The manufacturers of the Parshall
Flu~~ indicates that the meter reads within +/- S%-accuracy. The
Commission ran a dual measuring device within th~ Shorewood meter
over the last 9 ~onths and believe the ~eter is within +/_ 2%.
~1agnetic Plo\J Meters ar~ inserted wi thin forcemai1"ls. They have
known cross sectional areas and using maanetic flux, they measure
the velocity of the sewage and convert it to flow. The
manu~acturers of magnetic flow mete~s indic~te that the v can read
within -rJ- 3% accuracy. ..
. ,
'::.c:r=' ~'C1
.
.
ll,J: _1....1
<,'::i,j
~ _.r- I ,-
I',r-~="
~ 1
i._
['!fi
..
47J.SI7 M:E:TROP'OUTA.1\1 COV'ERNi',.!I::-.T
S7SS
witrun the m~tro(Xlm:ll'l U'!::l. and may fi;, and c~!lc~t [~~S ;lnc cn~rges (or the :lc:::ep.
t2l'lCe o( haz.)rdous waste ;I:; ~ne- COllVl".Jssior: de(emtil'les (0 be reasonable. With reo
sp~t (~':~ JCti>ities t1nde~ thi~ ~ection. ~he <;on'~"':"Jssion shail b~ :!uoject to and com-
~ly with the a.ppllc:lbte provi.~ion~ o( (his ch3p~er. f":'op.erty ~cqulffld by cbe
eomntissjon under this se:tlon shall be subject to ~he provisions of section 473,$4S.
.;1_'1y site or (aeility o'..vniX! Or oP<'ratM for Or' by c.."le cOr."~~ssion sbJl confo~. ~o t~e
poli<:y ~lan adopre<.i by the ~oUtldl !.lnde:" section 413.149 and s~::lIl be authonzed :.n
:1.:cordance with t.l1e .:omrnis3ioo'3 de...elo9m~n~ progz:L"Tl and '::l.Plt:;U budget 3.pprov~1i
by t."te council.
i 1976 c 179 :>10 I
4T-:.S17 ALLOCATION OF CURRE:.~ COSTS. S\.lbdivh:ion l. Current CO$t.s
~r~ed.. The estil7Uc~ CO~t$ of C~f:atiOfl. mainten~ce. and d~bt ser-"ice of the met.
r09<'lit:ln dispo~ sy:;tem ~o be paid Oy /.he COrr'_TJssion in each ~c:ll ye:u. and the
costs of ltcqr.:isi,ion and be~tennent of the :ystem which ue to Oe :,a.id dur.:1Z ~he ;e''U
fTom !"unds other ~hat\ bond prc<:~d5. includlng all expenses inc-..:rrec! ~y true COunCll
purSuatlt to ~e-ctions 4i3..5{l1 to 473..s.iS. ~re refem:d to :0 this sectio~ ;\S ~\lJ"t"t:nt
CO$1:s.3nd sh.::lll ~ Il.l!oc::ned in t.hl: bud~et fot' th~t ye~r to the respective IOQl ;;o....em.
ment units in the metto\X'litan are3 as provide-d to :lubdivisicns 2 to 6.
$ubd. 2. AltOdtion of ~etrQ9<>I1UJ'\ t1'~t~f\t wot'~ costs; 3diust~ Volu.rne. 'E.'<.
ce?t 3S provide<:! in ~ubdyjs:on 3. th~ CW"l'ect costs ~( all lreatment worxs in the mt'r.
l'Op<jlican dis)Xlsal system. ~haJl be :tllOC::Hed among J.nd paid by all t<x~ govt!rnment
units wi-ich will di.scharg~ !:e'Vl'lle~, directly or indJr~tly. into tr.e metropolitan djs.
posal system during ~he budget Yt1J". il1 proponion to the tot:<! VOlume estirr..ate<! to be
~ <usc.~-7.rgoo by ~ach local ;;:ovltrnment llt.it, adjusted as foilows:
(1I) lncreased Of de-::-u~. a$ the ca.::;~ may b-e. to ,the eX'te::t the corr.misskm ceo
te~jnes. on the basi:s of $lJch rustOMc:U and reasonably proje1;;t~d C:1t.:l as may ~
.available. tb:t ~he :':e~ge dlsch:u-g>:d by one U!"Jt. ..vill require rr.Or~ or Jess trea~mem
to prcduce 3. suitscle effluent. than ~hat disdlargtXi by others: .
(0) Cec:'~3ed by any 2mOUn~ o( surface water estimate(j by th~ ~Ot1".n'.i.ssi~m to
~ discharg'i:'d by ~ !~ gO\l~mmen~ ur.it from a combined stOl"'m :tnd S;uUt2.."Y sewer
sy~t~:n~ .
(c} Inc:'1U.~ed by t17~t Voh.lrn~ of norm~l s~t::..'"Y se~g~ which i:;l equivalent for
treatment' purpo.\':es to the ",.,IUi'J1~ of surbce W;;lt~:- referrt<';i to in (b) abo'le, as deter-
mined oy the commis:oion from avaibbl~ engin~ri:'lg d,u,-: and
(d) lncr~li$ec Or d~e=~,.j. :a tht (;;1S~ may be, by the amOunt o( any sl.lbst~'"ltial
::r.d d(l>rr:onst1"3hl~ erro!"' in'::I. pr~v\ous ~~ti~te,
Suoo. 3. Allo=tian of /'n1l'!.ropQlltall tre:ltment works Cf:l5ts; reser..ffi c.:lp;1crty. In
pn~pan:ng e.:lcb budget the cCl'nmiulo;\ shaH ~stimat~ the current costs of acquisition,
Oetunnent. and debt .sertic~. Only, o( eae!'l tr,atmE:-nt works in th~ metropolit3.tl ells.
P<'l!ial system wr.,kh will not be used to t(Jt~ c::!.paciti' durir.& ~h~ b'JdZ~~ year. and tile
pen:entag~ of :rud~ dpacity whic;h will noc be use<d. and shall de<jlJc~ the samt per.
cenuge o( suc!'1 COSt~ from the CUlT~nt costs allocated unde:- subdivision 2, Th~ to~.:xl
amOunt 50 dl!oduc~ed 'N"ith re~P<tCt to all treatment works in the sysum sholl O~ :lllo-
cated among 3..")d pale! by the res~t.iveo 1Q(:~ government urits i~ the rr.e-!roporit~
area for' whk!'1 c.apa.c;ity unus.ed ear:h year Is re~er""ed fo!"' futw"~ Use. in proportion to
che amounts of such C:lp~clty reserved fer ~;lch of th~m.
Sub<.!.~: All0<:2tian o( $.IlryfC1: "-Tea inten::eptor c:o~~s: "'clun-:e and r~l"Ved c::l.~c::.
ity. Exc~pt;liS provided In subcllYision S, til<! current costS of all intercaptors it! ~",ch
se......er' serYic,," ltl"'U.' e~t3bll$h~ purs~t ~c subdi....ision 7 shall ~ allcca~e-d among ;:mc .
paid by a!.I !I:x:a.! goverl"_"nent units in c.he sewer serliee 3.l'e~ which "",'ill discharge s~w.
3ge low !-"em, directly Of indirttct!y. during t.~e budg~t ye.u. In proportion to the 'Vol.
urr.~ ~stim3te-d ~o be so di~chu2ed by ~ach. l~ gO'lemrnetlC unit. adjusted :lS pro-
vide-d in subdhision 2. C!ause:s (b) an<J (d), after d~duction and aJ!ccation o{ cu.r.-enc
cn$ts of acquisition, bet~erment. and cebt serJic~. only. for estln".3terl :.mu~~ c:1p<:l>:icy
L.'l t.he s~rvice area :mcrc1!:::eor~ ~ong loc:u g~vern.~ent units In the service M~;l ror'
. which unus~ ClP:1clty therein hn$ ~en reserved. in the s~me mo.nner as that pro-
vided in SubdIvision 3.
Sub4. S. Nl0C4tlon of meL""Opollun L'lferr:ep~or l;ostS; ~ vall.le and popu!~.
tlon. \Vn;:n tJ\e cOllndi. determi~e.s L'l;at ::I. p~it:uJar imercep'or Or some parr: thereof
is of :\ubstami:41 b<:~~nt to t~e' metrop<)lit~n :I:"e3 llS ~ whol.,. e:l,.~ year the com:nis-
sion shall d~uct 311 o( tJ'Ie current cost:S U~.:r.~o( J.ltc<~ble ~o ~uch. ben~fit from th~
'=,c....[ 3[1
1,_,:~: I::'=i'[ ,"'F~'=. ;",'r j
'.
5759
"ME"TROPOt...'TA."I COVERr\'ME.."17 47"3.517
curr~nt CO$lS to be J..llo.:3tl!'d I.lnde!' suhdlvf:;ion 4. Tnot !Ot~J amOunt SO de-duc~e-d shall
be ailoc:lt,e.d among and pai\! by <111 Icc:l1 government ur.j,.s in the me~rcpo!itZlr. !l:-es:.
which wi!! di$chu-g~ .sewZlg~, dir~,ztJy Or indirect!y. into the m.:trolXlfit~n di~pc~::u $ys.
ten-. in ~'1e- n~xt budget yell.(. ~s (cllOW$: (3) oneJh:u! in tte propcrticn that U':e ~:;:..
se-ssed v:lh.:e- or all t:1x:tble property v.ithin l?':Ich such loczd ~oWmment unit in the
nlC't;,oj}oliwll arC:l. C>e::lrs to the ~lS~C~:'it"d v:tlue o( the !:::..'(~bLe prop<"rty In :.ll st.:dt l<x:-'\l
g-overnmenC unit.$. ~s l:1.tt firt~lly "e-qc.'llizac 'OO{ore Octo~l" I in t.h~ )'e:\.t in which th~
bu"l.g~t is :tdopt~; wd (b) one-half in tbe proportion th:ll the- popubtion of -:.:1Ch such
l~ g'Overnment U1'Ijt. in the metropolit;lJl area ~s 1.0 the totaL ~?daticn in all
sU/;r: 10<:3.1 government u:lits, as estimate-d by the council (ram the- most recent Qat;).
avail~b!t: to iL
. " )
Subd. 6. ~(~t Q( ~ymet'Jts. The <:OW1e~~ rr~>, by resolutkm proVice for th~
de{l:rm~nt of payrn~~t o( all or pare of the CU:"fent co~ts <:if il.~uIsjticn. bettern:~nc.
and oebt sel"Vice of ~t.im:ue-'j unut:cd ~p41city whic:h are- ailo<::te,:! by the c:orr'.r:".i~::jon
to :1 )oc:11 ~ovemme~t u.~..it in a.."IY ye:u- pUNtJ<1tU to SUbdivisions ~ a..'1d 4, repaY:lot~ .1t
suc:h cjm~ Or' ti~e.s ;.:: the c:ouncll $h~.lI ~~~ty in ~Ci' ~.$O!lJtJon. wlth imen::st :It lne
apPC'Oxll1"'..3Ce :1verage' annu:u rate bome by council bot'ldS ot:tsc.:tndir.g .:t t.he >lme or
the de ier.r.ent. :~ deterntin<<i oy the c:oWlc:iI. Such t;OStS tT".ay be deferre-d only when
the council d~t~es U'I~c :! sul:l::t:antl~ perUon of :.h~ tcm~ory o( a loc:J..l go...em.-nem
unit has net ~n conne<-:t!'d to th~ metropolit:l.."l. dlspos31 system. ~.'1d that tl'\~ ,I.maunt
of such COsts or so~ portion t.,ereo{ Js displ"oportionate to the available e.::cnomic t~
sources of the unit at th~ time. Suc.1:l deferred COsts shall be a!lo<:at~ to and paid by
"all loc~ government u.'1its in the metropolitan $r~a which \'I\H dIsch.a!'g~ sewage. dl-
(~tly or :nd1rect!y. into the mctropclit:tn &SpQs31 system Ir. the bud~et ye::.r for which
the deferment 1:s ~"l.ted. in the ~me" mll~e.:' ;1~d proportion.:; ;lS Cu.'"rent cos~s are :l.l.
loc."1te-d t:tlCef :ubdlvi:!on 5. V....hen s\.lch ce{er':'ed cost:s are ~ep~id they ~h~ll be :l.;)plled
in reduction of the total :L.'710'.:m of COStS ~ho:re3(ter al!<<:1te~ to e::ch of th~ lCC::l goy.
<m"w"l1-ent lJl"JtS to whic." such ae(ened <:Q$ts we:e allo.;.;lted in th~ 'feu of d~{errr:e:it, in
proportiM to their :lllc~tjons thereof th~t y~~. '
Subd. 7. Establishment o( -se!"vke areas. . The C'orr'.I!'jsston with the 3~prov3.1 of
L\oj~ coun<:il. after publi-: hearing. shall by re~olutlon est:lolish sewer service are:s. c~s~
ignat~ by name or number. ~.:l.ch compMsing that part o( the r:':etropotit:l..'1 lUe3 pn~
ma.."ily se!"'Jed or to be s~!"Ved by a partl-.;\.d::tr inter~~ptor or g:!'oup of interceptors, or
p:a.rt I.here-ef. situated within the sewer ser.rice a1'~~. At least 60 C;1j'$ 'before t:le hear-
ing on the e5tablIshm~nt of each ser-'ice area. notice shaH be publiShed in a newspa.
poet" or newspa~rs having geners.! drcul<lticn in the metrcpotHan area :trod in th~ se!".
vice are;! and mailed to the governing body of eacn loci.! governmen~ unit situated
wnolly or partly ....ithin the servit:e o.rea. $t:;{t,ing the date, time. and p!;lce ~( i.h~ he<tr.
ing Md the 16<:a! go"'e.-nm~nt units to be i"'cluce~ In whole Qr In part, a~d desctibin;::
in a ier:er~ W;1Y the iot~rce~tor~. ,existing Qr prClpo~. whi~h wi!! ~rve the are::; MY
h~uing or adj"umed h~:I.l"lng m:lY ~ ~djourned to 3. time !r.d pl~ce Sl~te-d 3.t the hear.
in~ or AdJoc:-ned heuinf. Or to ;l, tlm~ ::.nd pl~ce St:Hed In .s not:c= r.-~l~ at IU~t
tht'~ C:lY~ to Zldv~n<:e to che gO<,i~mi.":1;f !>>::!Jt:s of all iO<'~l gvY~mm(mt unjt~ in tn>: pro-
'CX'se-d ~ervic~ :u'e~_ No et"l'or or omiSsion' in the de$~ri9;:on in any r.otice of J ::ef"V\ce
uea. or the im~:ceptor"S c~ignatea t,."erefol" shaH in\l:.1icate t.~~ e~t3.blisl'l.r11ent o( ~M
ue;l as d~fi.nee i.~ th~ 1'60luoon 3.~proveod b~ t.lot~ c:oW'lcH.
Subd. S. Alt~ru:ttSve ~thod$ or ~Oc:itin~ CO$tS.. \Vhe~ it !>hail app.e~r th;'l.t t.h.e
costS ~tsbl!shea pursU:l.."lt 10 the provlsfott:S of subdiVisions 1 to 7 sh~l result ir. :l.n in~
c:-easitd cose to a murudpa.lity or sernce area which is now ~ng serviced oy the h.
cilities o! the Mlnr.eapolis'SL P:1W Sanitary District Or by the (acilities of ::..ny other
mc.nicipality or Sewer dIst.rict Ls "l1!1l"~Ss.on:l.bi>! or inequjt:1bi~. the COInn'Jsslon i$ ht?'!""eby
lHlt.hOr-::z:ed ::.nd dlr!!1:;te-.:l to ~copt. such ~t.hor me;lJl:s :md m~t.~ods of ~llccating costs. 35
to ~;::cn of th~!r~ :1$ m:iy.be faU. re:3:1cnOl.bte :lnd e~u.it.:o!~. , "
Subd.. 9. ~W~l" ~!""fk.e."are~ 3.d~SOrI Oo.tTth. %erteve... !h.e ooard eSt:lctisnes a
sewer se!"'o'\ce area purs~t to SUOc:llvision 7, the govemrnc:'\t I.lr'Jts located in whole
or L"1 p~ t.'J slJch area tn3.y e~t~blish :z. $~Wer u:rviel!' a:'e:l. advi~ory board for "such
area.. c:ompnsing Itot more tha.'1 f\v~ m.:mber~, on" e~ch co ~ !ppointe<d by e3cn of
the !1'1~ mOst po~uloU$ mlJ.....j6pa!i~!e~ Ln ::a.:.:h are:l a~ dete~jn~d by th<=, most .t:'.:em
de-cenn1al or 3pecia1 f<<feral cenSU$. The a.:ivisor')' board sh~Jl m~t W'ieh :h<: W:lste cor:.
t:"ol COl'r..t!'JSSiOfl member or members rl;';lre~enting .suc~ 31'ea. net less cnen ~h34 'iuar.
Cerly, to consult W'ith juch mem~rs et::ncerning the ac;:quisition. ~tc"ern1ent. operation
F.:'"
. .
~
.
.
,.
. m Q--4--.......o
c....~~
l:~J f:0~
'3' '=!
2'-1)
'(?.
zaCj
t-Jl.j · '31.:::l..; l.t30 '3\7: 0 i: :=t:.. ~]E d3S
~=:~~~~:e~=~~~~~~!~~~~~:e~~::~~~2X:~~~~=:~==~==;~=~:~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~;:::==~Z=~:~~~~~~=~:~~==~=:~=~~~~~::~e~:::
19S5
253
19S6
291
19S1
231
19M
250
At"'ttR 3 MON"l"dS
PROJECTED FLOWS: 257
1989
255
!F!t'..R 6 Moms
3$5
199Q' 1991
AftER 9 MONTHS
349
1992
1995
1996
1993
1994
~=~~~~:=:=~:~:~=::=~=~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~==:====:=::::7~!!~.~T!.~~,~#~s~~~:~=~~~~~=~=~:=~~~:::~~:=:;=:===~:~=~~=:~
m~4-~
'-....~
~\
J ~~\
) '..J
- ,~
3 sf
s-I
y ~).
~'..Jl.\J .. :31c:~,.J l.;.t=:CI' '3t": 01 :~6~. [1::: d3S
.
'"
'=,E:F' :::L~l
lei: ~~
:"=;1 "'Fi_=.
.
l.. -l VI -4 ... .., 1(\ ... 0 .JJ If' -4 If\ "" i
o.g:, .. ... .. . '" .. .. <II . III . . l
u ~ .0 ...g _ ('I"): ...-.... <<) M r- ..."") ..... ~ l-- ~
0, M ('Co'" ... I"-i t-t M N /'41 ("oil N N ~
r- '
I
J
1
J
I
,
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I
,
J
I
I
I
I
1
,
J
\
I
I
I
I
.
,
.
I
I
I.
I
,
r
I
I
I
I
.
I
.
1
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
1
,
.
I
I
.
.
I
\
,
I
j
.
I
I
:) -J _ C)- -.0 rr') <q" ~ - M .('"'i ...,. gl) 1Il")
q -< . .. ... ... .. . .. ... .. , .. ...
~ .... -0 ;:Q _ ..... Q- in n -a ". M ('~ c;O
QM'.........l"lN("l("l(")r>t":lMN
,..
__.0: ..0- M 0:'- '" NO"" \..~ Q)
N .. .. .. t .. .. ... .. .. .. . .
. I...,.jNN':".~On\"'nO'''4M M
,D>4O-""NQqo.;..fIo..:ll--t"ollOoO
.:s:- ., . ~ .. " till" II" .. "
......,p....-<"4\'f-~...................,...,..-
l!::
..l) 0(;;> o~ !I(:I....O-~O.....~....O-
;;l ('t. .,. . . . .. . .. , .. " .. ..
.x;-QI'-.~r--f"'o-Qr-"'-o-o4-Q
.o""M<<lr'-Oon-4~'"'1c:Jr-.t/'~
~ _ " ... .. .. .. . <i .. , \ . "
.,..~......n....Qn....~\t1..-.rMM.'"
J::
""..:IOOQOOOOOOQOO
==,_ .. " " .. .. , .. <I .. .. . ,.
"''''000.000000000
;z:
D..:...i'l_If't--....-~<"'''lNN
.='" I."" \P.",.,..."..
... .... N ~ ("l N ~ N n ,-.. c-.. ~ ," N
...
~
Pr-.,..,<r~...._,....r-.ONM,....Q-
:;t- .. ... . fI ~ .. .. .. .. ~ .. ..
.... .., 0:) -= ..""'1. - ..... 0. e .0 ~ ~ 0 ~
J:; ---....- -.
..,.In""...,~o-,..<O~M~......,.M
"CI _ . . '" 11 " .. .. .. .. .. . ..
f"'(" 1Ii)"'" N ..... eo I.j.;. I;ro ....., """ ~ In ~ - Vi
... J:l<"l"',....<oon-o....-olflll1"Oon
I
""
Cl
<::)
::z
!..LJ
'\..
I
. t
.01
.a I
,"") .
I
I
I
Q I
,
M I
0- I
('l .
I
1
I
... .
. I
<>-.
.....
J
I
I
.
01
. I
"" I
N ,
r
I
I
I
I
. I
.... \
<Q .
I
,
1
I
~I
. I
'" I
~I
,
,
I
I
0'
. l
01
.
I
,
I
.
N 1
I
01
;")1
I
I
I
I
r:\
<"l 1
.,.. .
.. /
t
I
1
01
. .
.,.... I
'" ,
,...\
"
l
I
-1/
[''[I
<fIO-1(')
~~:~,.~
~~.:eCl
":'''=/''lot-<
" . . ..
-"'40-.....
0"000-
--
~. N <0 .....
. . .. .
,...-4-00-
N
l"o...,....M
'I .. .. '!I
l(l ~ ..~ 10
4""'<0)"->
M-OIiOO
N~.N-
:Q) --t' M ....
..rvMN
..... - ......,
00000
0000
,...</"0-4
....~~-<>
~-:o:~
o-l.f")~<;Q
"iMNN
,......._<1)
'" .. .. ..
Ii} 0 \() In
<I)-<lCl'-
-- "'" ..........
<l:<l:Q:ll::
..
.
...
~
n
o
M
<r
M
.-
.
go
....
eo:
N
N
...
..
<D
(">
.
'"'
.->
Co
o
\t'I \t'I ..'l l(l In on In \f] ~ If) ..., ll'l
--------'~_...~-
q~qo~.,..q...,~"'f#"~'ltt'
:C::lC:;;:::;J::;J;;.-X:1::Z::'I:
I~ u ~ c.!.t ~ .(.'!J .:..:J ~ '--' ~ i":;' <.:J
%4::;:;;ZA=ZZZz'==
~-...-..-~"..,....."""'.....--'''''"'
I-'-""""'"'....i-r-J-,..-,...~t'-
~~~~~~~~~~~~
______....___,...,fMIIII
..-,........,............~I-Ii-'~.....;-
'" <t' (.11 \tI \tI lJ') In V1 (/) \tI "" /A
....w...www~W...wW....
~a~a~c5~gj~~5:3
....\Io"u.u..........~u......""'......
y-' W"'I Vj 1.1~ V"\ .." ~ ..") ~ ~ o.t1 s.n
N ~. N N N .... N "" ..... N N ....
~i!~~~~~X;iE~~Z
X)oolC"""'~~)04)oool;.M;)04~~~
-Q..Q...'O-'l-Q-<3..q.qo<l....-<;I
..'II...."....,
----""--.......--..................~
f~
.:>
..,
,...
M
N
...
<::>
,
....
v'>
,...
U L:> U ,:, ~ l.;> <.:I c.:. '-' C> C> '-' ..
'Z:e;:.:::-:z;r:::.t%:t:~%
....-----..........,.............---
U'l 0"', {n !n tn (f) t.n "-f:I tr1 trJ U1 In
::l~~::l::;);::)::;)=>::>=>=>:>
\l'I
...... .... ." ~. .~ .... - .... ... - ..... ..
-l
....j
...,.j
\'<1
7\
~
E
~
-1
i
J
j
,.... "
:- . ':=t
~
<C>
:r
-1
--i"
~
'3E:= 30 . ':';::: 10: ...:3 I~Sl rlF~'3, ill'l
>-
~
o
l-
~
~,
o
-IN
!L.Cb
0<>>
W....
e;::)
l.lJ~
~..,..
m-
:::~
Zal
:Je
o
o
o
S
w
a::
o
'J:
(f.)
F. '3
~
I I I j !
3: ~j !~
0 ~ ~ N C) or- <J:J I~ co N r-- l"t"'"
.s~ ...- "... ..- {'"} .... ..... 'C ~
u.. ..-j
I
t:j 1 ,
OJ <) @
-::::l U.I i~ 8 I <"
N ~ ;:c: e ..,
~ <n 8~ c
~l .., r:: ~~I
en e~ .:e '.) ~ x-;;
~ : 8' ~ ~ ~ .:.!
<D g ';
0, ~ ~ ! ... .: g
@, 3 ~ ~ .::s ~ -= 'i .... ~ ~
~ g 5~ ~ 8- 5 1 ~ x .. Q
..: ~ I() _ ff .... :2 ~ ~ 8' St ~ 'S 8 I
- .. 8 - ~ ..
l-' x ... ;. 0 .:: ... t: C'>l _ I I~ I~ ~ -
.0 X :) - :) x ~ = x I
1: ::! .... x :::; ::! w 'J) ~ )r; u _ ::> I
I,/)~ u.. u. a:: j ~ 1ll 'C :::: - -a'
~ ~ \f.l .... V) ~ Q ~- ...
I 0 \f.l 8 - ."., (1) ~ ~I~ - ~ en
, 8 <T <Q 10 'i l~ -- 1.0
j (,) ... 1
....... N - -- .... u... 1O .-
~C) Nl6 CO ~)
N \0 ..,. CO (10 (j) N
,g:: r-- ~r~ ,... ~ N ...... C\ '<T "" r.cl
u..
~ I
~ <) '.) ~ J I
w U.I ~
~ E, cr:: ll:
m M ~ .!!B 1
l... --
'" <.J e e ~<) 8.
-.:- '-'l ~ 1i I
~ e: ~ c S~ 8
S. J~ ~ <: - 'S ~~~ .:t; g
e 8 ~ il ... z
g )(
,g 8 N ' 8' )>. - .. ~ . ~ 8"
- l' 8 ... ;. 8 ~ ! J ~ 8
I.> .... )( .... ~ .-
- - ...
<1.l x ::l x ::s x - x & : c: .... )(
:J u. :; ~l; ,.
J:: ~ ...... :::; :n~ ::s
1: u. (J1 '0 (J) u.. I[ ~ I~ Ii u.. I
U) 2 (f) ] c::.... '"
C - ~ <1:1 {h
t,j "t' - lO lO
;-- ....... .,.. " ~ ...
~o to-. N <<) N (f) N aL. .. 10 N N
Q N
I u: :E, - - .... ..... ~I 0:1 I~ ~ ~
!
~ + . r-i
e ~ t:l ~
'" ~ '0 ~
0 ~ ~ -g '0
(,'t) e ~ .~ l- I- I 0
Q') 8 8 ~ sf c ~ ~'.S E-t
~ o. - c.J ~
8 .., . lo<. ~ - ~ ~ }; ./:: ..,
~l .. g st r-8 'i 8- I sf ~ ~
x stx ~ + x - ~ ~. lIS
~ ~ II ~ ~ 8 .2
::::o~ ~ ~i Ix k
2 u... '0 I/J S <0 ~ ~
';::1 (I) - N - ~ ~ g g 0
~l 8: 8 ~ <<><) e'''' ~
"l x 4) ... x I
El '<!' ;:) .... w CI G <I) Cl ;J( :>
t;- .- a:: .. -to a:: <4 ~
... ~ ..... ~~ 'I? ~ ::s ... ...
0 8- & (I) l <;:: j -6 u. ~ (I)
<.> ~ <0 !;: CI) 1.0
~ -- "" u.. 1z) 1 ..... ...
I 0') I
lUj
~ Sl I
~ I
- :il I
'E E
::l
I Ej (IS E'
t? 01
gj 'J:: ~I
~
~l c ~I
e
:E
- -g ,.. c: c 01 e
~ >- ..:.:: <0 lP Ej -3:1 :..
0 c :s > <U ,- .;; In ~ -=
II) 0 ..,
~ ~ .~ ~ <U 0 rt5 c:::l
~ -0 ... -
~ s:: ~ a. <G t: C> .t::: .... '2 ~ ~
en dJ ~ c: M C l~ ~
~ u ~ C ::l :2 I/) <U I II
:- E 0 "<' ~ ~
I ~ X <l) 0 .e
~ 0 W Cl l- :?: ~ '";: u 0 0 ~
-
u.. u::
TOTAL P. 10
..
.
.
CK NO
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCTOBER 11, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING
TO WHOM'ISSUED
PURPOSE
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
12378 (G)
12379 (G)
12380 (G)
12381 (G)
.
.
Miller Brothers Exeav.
US Postmaster
Joseph Pazandak
Wendy Davis
Release of escrow
Postage for 3rd qtr newsltr
Mileage/supplies/see 125
See 125 reimbursement
TOTAL GENERAL
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
-1-
AMOUNT
750.00
408.54
237.24
144.,43
1.540..21
1.540..21
IZ
'.
[:1 T'Y' ['I: .: :::: H [n.' tC' V,) II II C)
C:HFCh (,Pi'I,'!.I"'!!>:1 I 1::::'lll',!(;
I::: n r:;' () C.: 1'1') H h'1i 1 '::} ,)?, ill C~
.
CHECK~ VENDOR NAME
DI<:[I.,'1 i'T I III)
DEj:.JT.
Plr1CII..lr',!']
~". .... ..." ..~ ". ..~ ...' .". ..." .... .... _... -. .n_ "y .". ...... .... ".. ~ ,... ..,. .... ~... on' ,._ __ _.' .". ",. .". .... .... ..,. .... .... ....... .._.." .._ _." h,"
.... 'n' ..._ "0" ".. .". .... ...' .... ..._ ".. ,.. _._ .... .... .... _..' .... .... .... ..~ '.,. .n'"" ..,_ .... .... ... .'." .... _.,
12383 A-1 MTKA RENTAl,
E Cll..! r PI1ENT r~'I'::(",!T PII..
1In..,13
I. 2:~,r54 (:1~:~;PEf'! [(:;:11..1 T r~J("jF:NT COhP(;~f"'J,'y'
~; (~; F" F:~ "I' \/ F~ l C) Ii,) }-~l F ~:) "r \/ (:'; l... \/ F' ::::) j.;) t. J F: I;J l{ S
;~:~ J. _ :~7
1 >>;l.,dS C:. H Cp,h'rJ;:'(,HFi:;' L Uf"iHEh~
CONCF~ET[: SUPPL T l::::~:
:~4~? _ S>~~:;
12386 EXCElSIOR-CITY OF
SImU~L LIGHT UTILTTH~;:)
Th~{~F CON
lS7. ,~,3
1 ?:;r,Sl F:F:FD-'F~T TF CCI(,!TFi'CiL ;:::" T HC _ CHF::('lT CPII. S
1/,jpITEP [)F
480.81
1 ?'::; ~1 f~~
F I r'H~ t"-H': I {-I L
Ph'ODI..,ICTS COh'P.
Cr.WiPI.JTFFi' h(;~ITr'(T CONTf~l(~CT
COf"il:'1JTFP f''1('1 I 1',rr CC)t'"i,TF,'(.::ICT
CClhPI...ITr-:' P ['1(\ T i",IT Cni"ITF~(~CT
CDHPI..ITFF! f"i(~ T (rT CDrnFN~CT
COr'il=JI...!TFP I"j{~ 1 f"IT C:OH-rF:(lCT
CD 1'1 PUT F Fi' f"1 (.~\ T (rT UJf",), T FU'\ C T
COr1i:JUTFh' 1"1(111'-IT CONTFi'(\C;r
COf'lPI,.JTFh' f"i(~1 T (')T CDt".!TF~{>ICT
FOFi' F T N(\i",,!C 1 (~l. PFi'CH)l.JCT3 C
l~ D f1 T f"'),
Clel",,! GOVT
F T N(1i'.J,CF
P L PI I",! I') 1 N [i
PF,'OT I (I~:)
'/' f~~ .~l '; C) ()
55.00
(1':;':'7 _ ()()
~?}3!~1 ~ ()()
.....""~,,"..,.f)
...,.),.,' "
~? }~~ ~:l ~
37:<).00
I:) ~~ Fs~ }{. ~3 I~
l~j(:\TFFi' [)[
~:~:EI;,JEP DI.:::
:~~ '/"?) - () ()
*** TOT (\I.,
'? ~ .~ll~~;t ~~~ _ () ()
1 :.??:;~'\') HI:~f'-!f!FP T (J. C:CiI.HHV TPF (~:-::;UPFP I0tUGI.J;')T Ph' T ;:::O(WFI' FXPFr'",!SF
367,00
1 ?::.90 HFf"J.NFP [r'J. COUr)'T"l TF~['::(';SUF\'FF! PFI'OP T(j)(FS ?,?--:>;4'-'0051
PROP TAXES 26-14-0088
PROP TAXES 33-14-0008
*:icj{ TCiTI~)IL FnF~ HFr"n',,!FPH~ CDUh!TY rm~A
r'iUN F;L DC
I"iLH'.,,! IJ 1.. DG
1"'ilH',J, HL DC
2 ;.l()~?.. 1~~)7
117_39
1 7 ~~) _ I~:):?
7' ;; ~"S\~) _ ()~~
12391 HOPKINS PARTS COMPAHY
(:iUTDhC::T T VF:. SIJPPL T FS
CITY G(\F:
'~?Ir ~ 3'?
12:~9? KFh! JP,F;~CHO II"~~~~l.JF;'t11"',!CE
(~lUTCi r I",J. SUI:::' P1I',.J,CE
i"iIH",J, F3L. DG
:~?O_ 00
12395 KHI..JTSON ;:')EFi'VTCFS, 11'-1C.
"z, qQXe
....". t.,I" ',.J
-'
;:::FPT Fi'EC:YCI.. T i'lG
F\'FCYCL. T ["'1.
1 ??:9,~ L '-.:r F.'UHF;Ft:;' ~::;TI~I"iP
OFT T CF ;::;UPPI I FS
G I::: r',,! GO\)T
~~t ~~; _ .~:I (.
1 ? 3 9 ,r.:, L :011'J,0 F 0 I.Jl P f"1 F j".rr ,n,.J, C .
F:OFlC(\T C::I.JTT T 1'-K~ ED(~ES
CITY G(;~1r-~'
113,01
1:?:596 LF(\GIJE OF.: f"if",! CITIES tt.JCmKEFi'S" crWiF' HJ,;:)tJF;(~f'-W:F:
li,,IOf-,'K[PS' COI"l:::! I 1')~:':;I..,IFi'(;~\NCF
ltJDFi'}{FP~~)" CUf'4P T h!SUFU~II'.,!CF
*** TC)T(\I FOh' t E(~GUF' OF H(") C T T T F~:~
j'liH",), FSL DG 1 ~:~ , (:'i4S . 00
-------- 1.09S.00
-------- J,641_00
?1,,60::'>:<::.00
:1 ~?397 ("ifl:r",ll"! l'lAO[-: P}:::'OD1JCT~~:
DF'TL.lu HDLF~3 TN FT)CF:
PI.JH ltJf<.S
40 . C)O
1:::':::'92; f"iTDl,i.JFST m,ISTI"j[::;::;S PPDflUCTS OFFICE SUPF'L TF:3
GEr',), GOVT
1. El'7 _ ::j::?
1 ??::99 H(! SiJl'.,! PUHL. I Cf~ T I Of'J.S
PUELTSHTNG
:1. ?l .~I _ :-:) t~,l
12400 ONE CALL CCiNCEPTS. INC. PPINTER MATNT CONTRACT WATER OF: 112_50
PRINTER MAINT CONTRACT SEWER OF 11?_50
*:f.=* TClT(\L FOf-\' OI,.J,F C(~LL cmJ,CFPT;), r ?')'S.OO
1 ':240 1 ;:)1'. P(:';!.IL ST Pll'lP 1/,JOFi'f<'S" T h!L: 1994 DOG TAGS
GEl""! CDVT
IO?:.9?
-2-
r: T T \' en: ;,::; f--I D FI' F 1;..1 [: D I)
c: H C C~: }{ (~ j) P h' I] \/ (,,I I r ::31 T i,.j!.~
Fell:;' [: c: r C"1l::': F:Ti' JI. 1 .)")?, ['/IT G
&
,,,. ,,', ___. .... ".'" _.., .... .... "" ..." .no .... .~._.. .... .... ..._.... .... h~ .~., ..... L~. "." .... .... .n_ ..... .... h'_ .... '."." ,~" ._,' ,.." "" h" ..,. nO' ,'"
....... .~. "" ~... ......"" .... ..,. ..,. .~.. --." .~.. .... ,... .... .n' ,,~ .~. ~_. ...' .~.. 'h' ".'" ..~. .... .... ,,,. "." .~.... .~.' ..."...
j
. \..; r:: C~ \.< {~~ \/ r:- 1'.) rJ () F,t I"',! (~ (.oj r~
[) r~::- :3 C~ F~,~ "J l,:Jl 1 (0) I')
l)i::PT ..
(\f"!OI Ji'.r!
1 ;',> <.:::-0'" ;,::;C) I.l{ i'i Ti< (j PLI!J S(jF F T """ !)[ P ('jI.iC;I...I:3T i,:.:CI()}{ T f".1C FE F:
POl.. J CF FJ
(~:> .~~~l _. (.:1.'7
1 :? /l () ',:::! -r T l'/l :.: ~~~~ {'i \/ F: F~ [11'::- F~ ~) T "r F' ~~; F~ f.~
h T (lUTF::S
P L (~ (...! hi r /'1 C;
1 ?:z, .. 00
1 '?404 TCl~.il{(j (,:UTO (~I'.m IJC1{')Y ;.3UPP ;::;HCJJ.:J SUP!:Jl r FS
CITY G!;)IF~
:"1_ ?;1
]?405 TWIN CITY WATER CL.INTC
SEPT WATER TESTING
1,i,Ji:jTER DF
;.?O _ 00
1 ?40,c, us I,..JE;:H CCH"WIUrH Ct~ T I C!i"1~::;
r:;:FPi:\ T F;' PHONE' L T ('-.iE
C T T\' Gt~h'
? .~~I .. Cl ()
12407 WIDhER. INC.
};'FP(~ T F' b" Gt\TF Vp:L \IF
1;.)(:':; Tf::: r::~ D I':
{.{..o .. 00
,J/
bT
*::{{::{(
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
:~I (~ .~. ~~) ~:~ I.{. .~ .4;2
':l -',. ~ - - ',~ -:,
* ::~( ~~<
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
35,924.53
4
/77
'7"7
-3-
.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PROPOSED
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Consisting of a Capital Improvement Plan
and a Finance Plan for the Years
1994-1998
LATE STUDY SESSION
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I . INTRODUCTION............................................. .1-3
II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN................................ 4
A. Capital Improvement Plan Elements:
Water............................................. .5-7
Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-13
Stormwater Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14-16
Sani tary Sewer..................................... 17
Public Facilities & Office Equipment...............18
Equ i pment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 20
Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21- 32
Unscheduled Potential projects.....................33
B. Project Schedules:
1994-1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34-36
C. capital Improvement Funding by Source................36
I I I. CAPITAL FINANCE PLAN.................................... 37
A. Funding Source Summary............................... 38
B . capital Improvement Budget........................... 39
IV. APPENDIX - Public Improvement Process....................40
"
I. INTRODUCTION
This Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a coordinated schedule of
municipal capital proj ects, improvements and purchases for the
years 1994 through 1998. Furthermore, it is a Capital Improvement
Finance Plan. It identifies sources of revenue to pay for the
planned capital project improvements and purchases. There are two
main parts which are integrated into this program document, the
Capital Improvement Plan and the Finance Plan.
The capital Improvement Plan consists of several elements. The
capital improvement narrative which explains each capital
expenditure by function. The capital improvement project schedule
lists expenditures by year' over the five year period. The Funding
Source Summary traces all expenditures and revenues in and out of
each of the various funds~ and tracks fund balances during each
capital improvement fiscal year. The section entitled "Projects Not .
Assigned a Year" is a list of projects which have been identified
but not developed enough or attained a high enough priority to be
scheduled .at this time. The final schedule in this section is a
summary of expenditures by funding source.
The Finance Plan section lS simply a summary of general fund
appropriations for capital projects and a summary of activity in
the capital reserve fund over the five year period of the CIP. Also
included in this section is a sample Capital Improvement Budget
Resolution which would have to be passed separately for the first
year of the program, 1994, budgeting capital purchases and projects
for the year.
This document is an important element of the comprehensive planning
process. See Step 4: "plans, proj ects, programs" of the
Comprehensive Planning Process Chart on Page 3. It is the bridge
between policy planning and implementation. It is the direction the .
City will take over the next five years and beyond in undertaking
and financing capital improvements consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. with this Capital Improvement Program the City
Council is integrating the City's physical needs with financial
resources.
The City Council undertakes a series of workshops throughout the
year as part of the CIP process. The Park Commission spent many
hours redrafting the Park CIP for submission to the Planning
Commission and City Council. A draft CIP was sent to the Planning
Commission to review for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The CIP's place in the City Council's work agenda is explained well
in the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report:
1
.
.
~
liThe City Council recognizes that its work consists of more
than responding to citizen requests and adopting an annual
budget. The City Council's calendar consists of three phases.
The first phase is Planning, which includes employee and
systems evaluations, review of the previous years work plan,
review of the City's Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary,
review of the Statements of Purpose and Values, and
identification and prioritization of issues for the next
twelve and twenty-four months.
The second phase is that of Programming. Each year the five-
year capital Improvement Program is reviewed and updated based
upon priorities established in phase one. In addition, any
changes to the Comprehensive Plan are made based upon the
phase one decisions.
The third phase is Budgeting. The Capital Improvement Budget
is established as year one of the five-year Capital
Improvement Program. This five-year capital Improvement
Program is a very important financial planning document as it
projects the City's capital improvement needs and identifies
financial resources to meet those needs. It clearly identifies
areas where policies are lacking and where problems may arise
in the future."
It is important to recognize that needs, resources, and projections
change over the years. Therefore, it needs to be a fluid program,
with review and update each year.
Each project which is identified in this program must be approved
by the City Council under normal processes. A typical proj ect
public improvement process is shown as a separate appendix.
2
comprehensive pianning process
1] 1[.. Planl~ng... .tactics . ........ ....... ..... ................................. ....I
~ f ~;~~~i~~i~~~~~~r;uu .u............................. !1
, l ~
physical . economic . soc:al t;~
land \ transpor-l community! pocu-I property I marxet l' IJ
use I tatlon I facIlities jlation 1 values I potentials ~:::I
. (
b ~
'\.::.:.:.:...........:.:.:......~::::::::::-:.:.:.:.:..:.;..................-..-...::.:.:.:.:...:.:..:.::.::-...-.:.:...............:.:.:.........:.:.:.:....:.......:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.'
t::::::t
0J 6..... -~L:::::. ...... :..-.. ......... ". ..' ................:-.....................~........ .7.. ........... ':':'l1
22) 11 policy plan ~
'-planning and 1 ~
~ inventory ooals and oevelocment ~
8i anaiysis Objectiyes poiicies plan
4
'.. .... ,y: ..
.. .....
. ,
plans, projects, programs
~
3
.
.
.
.
II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-
The first section of the Capital Improvement Plan explains proposed
capi tal proj ects and expenditures by function: water, streets,
drainage, sanitary sewer, public facilities, equipment, and parks.
It consists of a proj ect narrative, a proj ect schedule, and a
funding source summary which traces the affect of the scheduled
projects on the various funds in the City. The second section is a
series of charts which layout the project schedules for each year
of the five year plan.
4
ESTIMATED COST:
$10,000
.
~
\VATER
In recent years, the city has investigated the feasibility of a
city-wide water system, and ways of making the existing system more
efficient and economical. It now appears that a city-wide system
is not desired in the near future, and that selling or letting
other cities operate Shorewood's water system is not economically
possible. Therefore, future capital expenditures should
concentrate on proper upgrades to the system, combined with orderly
expansion where possible.
1994:
Major overhaul of the Woodhaven Well. While this item would
ordinarily be considered maintenance, the project is of sufficient
size and scope to be considered a capital improvement. This well
has not been dealt with for about 15 years because of the lack of
a backup water source. A temporary connection will have to be made .
to Chanhassen, the well pulled, and necessary repairs and
maintenance made.
ESTIMATED COST:
$25,000
SOURCE:
Water Fund
Water System Analysis. An overall water system analysis was last
performed in 1984 in conjunction with the Comprehensive Water Plan.
This analysis was performed for the water system as a whole (city-
wide) to help guide future water extensions towards an overall
system. It is now apparent that a complete water system is not
imminent, and that near-future extensions of the existing systems
must be carefully analyzed to prevent problems to existing users.
This analysis should include field calibration of the model to
ensure accuracy.
SOURCE:
Water Fund
Connection in Conjunction with T.H 7/ Vine Hill Road Construction.
This will be the final connection in the Shady Hills Area.
ESTIMATED COST:
$18,000
(Verify)
SOURCE:
Water Fund
5
.
.
1995-1998:
Trunk Extensions. The City has had, and will continue to have,
trunk extension needs. The connection of the Southeast area and
the Amesbury System has been made shorter due to recent
development, but a final route, potential easements, and actual
connection still remain. This program provides a means of funding
this connection and minor extensions.
ESTIMATED COST (per year) :
$25,000
SOURCE:
Water Fund
Water Extension Policy:
In 1994 the city Council should review and update the current water
extension policy. A summary of discussions held by the Council in
1992 is presented on the following page.
6
Follow-up thouqht to the work session notes - Monday, May 18, 1992
WATER SYSTEM OVERALL GOAL
Allow maintenance of individual wells throughout as much of the
City as possible while encouraging the interconnection of municipal
systems and requiring new subdivisions within a water system area
to connect to the municipal water system.
Objectives:
· Provide for the interconnection of all municipal water
systems.
. Require all new developments to hookup to municipal water
which are within a municipal water service area.
.
Provide all individual water systems with a backup source
of water including a water tower on the west side.
· Initiate a fund to finance the interconnection of systems
and a water tower on the west end.
Potential Funding Sources:
. Bond defeasance funds
· A surcharge on west end system water bills
· Any fund balance in a Public Works facility account
· Proceeds from the balloon payment due from the sale of
the house behind City Hall
.
Transfer from water fund cash balance
.
General or capital fund transfer
Besides tower and interconnection expenses, balances in this water
system improvement fund could be used to pay the City's share of
projects to get water to new developments. Formula for paying for
the cost of getting watermain to a new development:
20% chargeo to the developer to be paid up front;
20% City for oversizing and on assessable frontage
60%
property owners along the
assessment to be paid upon
for $500 which would be
availability charge
way in a form of deferred
hookup to the system, except
an up front fire hydrant
7
.
.
.
.
STREETS
The need for safe, well-maintained streets has been recognized as
important by the City of Shorewood, as well as' by the travelling
public in general. In past years, approximately $262/000 has been
ear-marked from the general fund for street maintenance functions.
The funds that were spent went for patching and asphalt overlays of
existing roadways rather than reconstruction with proper drainage.
Public Works and Engineering believe that it may not be
economically advisable to continue this practice. Proper drainage
and subgrade of a roadway are essential to long pavement life and
are left uncorrected with a simple overlay.
The Special Assessment Question:
In addressing the policy considerations identified in the 1992-1996
CIP, specifically design standards and financing options, the City
Council established and accepted the final report of a street
Reconstruction Financing Task Force in 1992.
During 1993/ the Council considered a special assessment ordinance
consistent with the recommendations of the Task Force of assessing
one-third the cost of a typical street, and similar to the program
described in the 1993-1997 CIP. The Council determined that the
proposed ordinance should not be adopted at this time. There was
concern voiced for the actual benefit to property owners from
improving collector streets, for the concept of a special
assessment adding to the "tax burden" / for truck traffic due to
construction, and for the fact that many streets do not have water
utility mains under them. The Council will continue to consider
these issues.
This 1994-1998 CIP plans for street reconstruction without the
added revenue source of special assessments. the taxing effort for
street reconstruction is being accelerated by $20/000 per year in
this plan from $230/000 in 1994 to $310/000 in 1998 in anticipation
of greater street reconstruction needs.
Streets Defined:
Shorewood has two very different kinds of streets: standard local
streets and MSAjlocal collector streets. MSA stands for Municipal
state Aid. In 1990 Shorewood became a part of the MSA system and
therefore eligible for state funding for a portion of the major
roadways in the city. Currently the amount budgeted is at about
$235/000 per year with an additional $13/000 available for
maintenance. There is a potential penalty for not using the funds
on a timely basis. Construction funds from MSA may not be used for
local utility improvements (i.e. water mains) or for bike trails.
They can, however / be used for storm sewer (in the roadway)
sidewalks (5' wide max.) and must utilize curb and gutter. street
planning should incorporate trail plans as adopted by the city
Council (see Park and Trail section).
8
Additional potential projects for the future are the remainder of
smithtown Road, Galpin Lake Road (which must yet be officially
designated) and Covington Road.
.
MSA/LOCAL COLLECTORS
Desi2n Policy:
The current minimum width and current Shorewood standard for MSA
streets is 26 feet. This width could be adjusted by the city
Council (with state approval) if factors might call for a different
width, such as the need for on-street bike lanes, need for on-
street parking, high traffic counts or other safety considerations.
Such changes should be made only after holding a public information
meeting. Curb and gutter is required on MSA system streets.
Reconstruction Project Schedule:
The current, average, estimated cost per mile of reconstruction to
MSA standards is $712,800. The following project list is a blending
of the city Engineer I s needs analysis with available financial
resources. During the first two years of the plan right-of-way .~.
acquisition and preliminary design work can be taking place.
Foot-
age
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1,500 Lake Linden
$200,000
$230,000
1,700 Yellowstone to
Country Club
2,300 Country Club
4,200 Smithtown Road
Country Club
to Eureka Road
$50,000
$300,000
$0
$540,000
TOTAL
$0
$50,000
$730,000
$0
$540,000
Because of the time and potential additional expense for obtaining
right-of-way, clearing existing utilities, and gaining the required
permits, each potential project will have to be approved on its own
individual merit. Therefore, the above list is considered a goal
over the next five years, with revision as necessary. Due to the
complexity of reconstruction projects, a two-year timetable for
each project from start to finish should be anticipated.
9
.
.
Funding Source Summary:
~
The following funding source summary illustrates where dollars will
come from to fund the project schedule.
Balance, January 1
MSA Contributions
Transfer - street Reconstr.
Transfer - Trails
Projects/Expenditures
Balance, December 31
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET FUND
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
---------------------------------------------------
746,300 937,300 1,117,300 644,300 874,300
230,000 230,000 230,000 230,000 230,000
73,000 54,000
(39,000) (46,000) (67,000)
(50,000) (730,000) (540,000)
---------------------------------------------------
937,300 1,117,300
644,300
874,300
551,300
The State of Minnesota allocates funds to cities over 5,000 in
population to improve designated municipal state aid streets.
The mileage of city streets designated as MSA streets is
according to a ratio established by the State. Annual
allocations for this purpose are made by the State according to
a formula which considers a city's population and its need for
funding for MSA streets. It is anticipated that the City's
annual MSA allocation for the next five years will be as shown
above. Expenditures shown above are as listed in the Municipal
State Aid section of the Streets & Highways schedule.
10
LOCAL STREETS
~
Design Policv:
When the City determines that a street should be reconstructed
(work beyond patching, seal coating, and overlay), it would be
rebuilt to its current width. Current width could be adjusted by
the City Council upon request of the property owners or by the
Council following a public information meeting if traffic counts or
safety considerations suggest a wider street is warranted.
The City'S street Reconstruction Financing Task Force broke the
local streets down into three categories:
. standard local
. Substandard local
. Other
24'+
20-24'
less than 20'
There are potential safety and legal concerns in reconstructing a
street today to less than a 20' width. This needs to be reconciled
prior to reconstruction of any of our narrow streets.
Reconstruction Proiect Schedule:
Currently it is determined that the first projects can wait to be
reconstructed until 1996. This will allow time for subdivision
construction traffic, along Strawberry Lane for example, to subside
before it is reconstructed. Some of the proj ect funds in this
schedule should be spent over the next two years in preliminary
design work so proj ects can be ready to be bid in January or
February of their scheduled construction year.
Mile- 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
age
.49 Strawberry $0 $0 $297,000
Lane
.16 Smithtown $97,000
Lane
.16 Shorewood $97,000
Lane
.06 Christmas $36,000
Lane
.11 De1lwood $67,000
Lane
.09 Mallard $55,000
Lane
.17 Timber $103,000
Lane
.11 Pleasant $67,000
Avenue
.62 Excelsior $326,000
Blvd
TOTAL $0 $0 $491,000 $261,000 $393,000
11
.
.
~
In addition to this list sections of st. Alban's Bay Road may need
striping or widening due to traffic increases which have resulted
from closure of slip ramps on Highway 7. Murray street may need
reconstruction following subdivision construction in 1994 and 1995.
Additionally, the following streets have been identified as the
next priority:
Noble Road
wild Rose
Garden Road
wiltsey
(100% assessed -
770'
2,360'
540'
490'
currently gravel)
$100,000
236,000
75,000
70,000
streets and conditions need to be re-evaluated each year so that
more specific plans can be established. Only the first year of this
plan is considered "authorized".
.
Fundin~ Source Summary:
The following funding source summary illustrates where dollars will
come from to fund the project schedule.
STREET RECONSTRUCTION FUND
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
---------------------------------------------------
Balance, January 1 464,000 656,370 834,227 459,742 406,207
General Fund Contribution 230,000 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000
MNDOT Reimbsmt. - Seasons 37,000
Tfr - 5% to Trail Fund (7,500) (8,500) (9,500) (10,500) (11,500)
Overlay Projects (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) (80,000)
. Projects/Expenditures (491,000) (261,000) (393,000)
MSA Project Funding (73,000) (54,000)
Interest Income @ 4% 12,870 16,357 9,015 7,965 3,554
---------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31 656,370 834,227 459,742 406,207 181,261
. &
The City budgets funds for the overlaying and reconstruct~on ~~
local city streets. The Street Reconstruction Fund is establ~shed
as a reservoir for these funds. Revenues are budgeted
transfers from the General Fund and expenditures are as
shown in the streets & Highways schedule for local streets.
Fund balances are allocated to future local street improvements.
12
~
1994-1995 Activities:
Although no reconstruction projects are scheduled during 1994 or
1995, there will be significant activity undertaken in the street
area.
· Annual seal coating and patching programs will continue
as funded through the general operating budget.
. $80,000 is set aside each year for the on-going overlay
program.
. The City will be investigating improvements to the
intersection of Seamans Drive and Yellowstone Trail at
Highway 7. Among the alternatives to be considered are:
Closing the access to Highway 7 and moving
Yellowstone Trail further to the north; and
- Realigning the intersections.
City costs for these alternatives could range from $5,000
for closlng the access to $200,000 for realignment.
. Investigate the Lake LindenjTH 41-TH 7 intersection and
service road. Among the alternatives to be considered
are:
- Closing the Lake Linden access to TH 7;
- Upgrading the frontage road;
- Upgrading the TH 41jTH 7 intersection; and
- A combination of these alternatives.
At this point there are no cost estimates.
. Preliminary design should be undertaken for proj ects
scheduled in 1996 so that projects can be let in January
or February.
. Acquisition of right-of-way necessary to do future
planned proj ects should be undertaken so the schedule can
be adhered to.
. Policy questions such as the use of special assessments
for reconstruction projects should be finally determined.
13
.
.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .
The major goal of the first few years of this capital program will
be the implementation of the projects that can now be funded with
the storm Water utility Fund. These projects are, by definition,
small in scope. No single project should be larger than $15,000,
and it is anticipated that they will average about $3,000.
Funding for the Glen Road and Grant-Lorenz drainage projects are
still included in this schedule, but the public need or desire for
these projects should be investigated before initiating them. The
Minnehaha Creek Watershed district has expressed interest in
completing the Glen Road project, and may be willing to participate
in the cost.
Proiect Schedule:
. 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Glen Road:
Easements $ 88,000
Construction $111,000
Grant-Lorenz:
Easements $ 5,000
Construction $55,000
TOTAL $199,000 $60,000
.
14
~
Funding Source Summary:
The following funding source summary illustrates where dollars will
come from to fund the project schedule.
STORM DRAINAGE
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
---------------------------------------------------
.
Balance, January 1 11,100 41,922 12,466 24,956 56,055
utility Fee Revenues 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
General Fund Contrib 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 .
Drainage District Revenue 139,300 42,000
Maintenance Expenditures (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000)
Project Expenditures (199,000) (60,000)
Interest Income @ 4% 822 244 489 1,099 1,721
---------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31 41,922 12,466 24,956 56,055 87,776
The Storm Drainage Fund is established to finance maintenance
of the City's storm sewer system, and to fund future drainage
projects. Revenues are derived from a utility charge to all
properties within the City. The City anticipates that 50% of
annual revenues will be used to maintain the system, and 50%
will be available for drainage projects. Annual contributions from the
General Fund and tax levies on special drainage districts will complete
the funding requirements for drainage projects. The amounts shown
for drainage projects are as listed on the Storm Drainage Schedule.
The following page is a flow chart which explains funding for the
Shorewood Stormwater Management Program.
15
. (,1(:::1 ~..:..~:'
C::,I'l liF'L ::; , i'1f '1
P.c
'"3:=: ....:,. -":-'1
.....
IJl
0
@ 2 u
u v 1!S '~ '- .....
aV
"-'va ~
ce 'c .c ~'8 ~ v
~..........
<<S(/)~ r-'::" ctl)~
e 0.'''' <
cuCl v....l-~
(/) ~ 00 EUC1:l
~ ,... v,E: v .~ fr.;d
Q:).c x coaen.::;
~~ (/) ~
<U~~ ~ .-
gr ....(1.) c: C:Q a
~....-
X+J.c :2:5::;-0 t:; t:::s
.... ~ ~
U)~~ 8 .- Q.) 2 5
~ tE~.c t
....... Q.) '"0 ~ ......
-..;. 3:
~>vv ~
l::O ~ 32!::rn ~
~ vC E o..c ~ ...... 6
s::: :9& aEe 0
-a
Qj ~e tr.i U ~ 'l;::S
.~
~ ov ~ ~ ~
.,....,
.... s:: t::: ,~
U(1.) ~ ~
0 ..... Q.,
~ 8 ~ e =:::
. Q.. '$
\1..) '- ..... ~
~ o:rl ...c:. ~ ~tj
t::: ~'8 ~ c:
'- 13!;
.~ No.. :::l ~
~ ~ 13 >.!:2
t:~
::s "... .g ~~
-
~ ~ .~
~ 0 f1:l ~ ~..c:
Qj ~ b ~~
>-
....... .c~
~ 0 Q.J ,- ~~
~ 0 'E.. (".l
0 .9
o. s::: ~~
....
@ ~ V3 ,... t;:st::s
.~ C ~.s
~ '- u
~ ...... .......
::3 .-
Ec~ SC '-> .... ....
c:: :s .c '->0-
"S :S~
~ Va);.... lUlU V) .~ ~
2 ...........C'\:S ~ "'-" ~ ,.....
UJe::;j U)O ....
>--lUo :>.~ .0 8 \3Q.J
. r./jo.o VJo.. ~?3
tfJ <l)~"""'" .- \J
lo-<U -
"-
..::..-:eUJ (!)U -... c: .~~
.s~r-; - ..... :::l ~ -..;.-!:2
~ (\5- ~
,:E~ ~~ - -.....
a ~ l- 11 E.8 "t::o ~ ,~ ~
O~o,) ~
~ O~Q.) .... lo-C: b ..... It) "0'
f1:l 0.- .... bra
?;?:~ Qj ....~ Q.)
<l) S .0 >- en:;E '0 <.,:)
~ ,- ~ @@ @
~ o~-
....0'.0
-....:::>
U)U'J 0
N
0 "h
155 . .
~
Q.) U')
bo '. CI)
~ ~<u <U~
. "-l U
~;... :3~
. t:: :3 v)"\::)
::sa ~~
~UJ
f
16
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
The operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer is a city
responsibility necessary to protect the public health. The
existing system covers nearly all property within the city limits
and includes varying sizes and types of gravity sewer along with 18
lift stations to transport sewage where gravity flow is not
possible.
The system can be divided into roughly two categories, the older,
original portions constructed by the city in the early 1970's and
the newer portions constructed as a part of (relatively) recent
development.
.
As the older portions of the system are nearing 20 years old,
recent expenditures have focused on the maintenance and cleaning of
the older gravity lines combined with the rehabilitation of lift
stations (which is now completed). Maintenance has consisted of
flushing, televising and sealing to prevent the inflow and .
infiltration (1/1) of clear (ground and rain) water into the
system. Rehabilitation of the lift stations consisted primarily of
conversion to modern systems and the replacement of worn parts.
Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Control:
1/1 reduction is desirable from both an economic and environmental
standpoint. Reducing the amount of clear water in the sanitary
system should reduce the charges levied by the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission (MWCC) and reduce the operating time of the lift
stations. Data from the MWCC and lift station run times will be
analyzed yearly to determine what, if any, benefit is being
realized by the City. The economic worth of the environmental
issues involved is necessarily a matter of council policy.
Sanitary Sewer System Extensions:
The existing trunk sewer system is adequate to serve the
anticipated development over the next five years. Any local
extensions are anticipated to be paid for either through
development or assessment at the time of petition.
17
.
.
~
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Plans must be finalized on the disposition of the old City garage
buildings at Badger Park. A new shelter may need to be built to
house the Badger well.
Park Commission and Planning Commission have identified a parcel of
land on Academy Avenue which could be sold with the proceeds going
to park improvements. The County and School Districts should be
contacted to begin the process which would allow this to happen.
The City will need to decide on the disposition of the Shorewood
Liquor Store located at Vine Hill Road. It is scheduled to be
displaced in 1994 by the Vine Hill Road intersection construction
project.
During the coming year, the City should be looking for ways to fund
computer updates and improvements.
$90,000
Reconstruction of ci tv Hall /Badqer Park parkinq Area
(1994)
$25,000
Badqer Well Buildinq (1994) (Water Fund)
$12,500
Office Copier for Citv Hall (1994)
10
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
.
EQUIPMENT
The Equipment Replacement Schedule, as laid out on the next page,
identifies the year that each piece of Public Works motor equipment
is likely to need replacement. The overall purpose of the schedule
is to help us identify ,the financial resources that will be
necessary to maintain an economical Public Works fleet which meets
the City's needs.
The schedule indicates that $94,500 should be set aside in 1994. An
increase in the set-aside amount of 5% per annum may be necessary
to keep up with inflationary trends in the heavy equipment
industry.
Projections show a need for short term internal borrowing within
this effort in 1997-1998. As time goes on we may find the need for
borrowing narrows if the fund balance increases because resale
values are higher than 15% used, or if purchase prices are lower ...
than anticipated. In addition, equipment will be replaced when ~
needed, not when scheduled. If a vehicle's life can be reasonably
extended, fund balances remain high and therefore there may be no
need to borrow.
other options which could be considered at the time of a short term
fund deficit is the use of five-year equipment certificates, or
capital lease/purchase agreements.
Fundinq Source Summary:
The following funding source summary illustrates where dollars will
come from to fund the project schedule.
EQUIP~~NT REPLACEMENT FUND
Balance, January 1 140,000 209,688 87,351 11,578 862
General Fund Contribution 94,500 99,225 104,186 109,396 114,865
Sanitary Sewer Fund 22,750
Equipment Cert/Interfund Loan 30,000 125,000
Repayment of Loan @ 5% Int (1,500)
Purchases/Expenditures (31,669) (227,386) (204,203) (150,356) (238,996)
Interest Income @ 4% 6,857 5,824 1,494 244 22
Balance, December 31
209,688
87,351
11,578
862
252
The Equipment Replacement Fund is established to finance
the replacement of depreciated public works equipment.
Sources of revenue are mainly budgeted transfers from the
General Fund. Equipment Debt Certificates or interfund loans
may be used to cover short-term shortages in fund cash flow.
Expenditure amounts are as shown in the Equipment Replacement Schedule.
19
-4.....("")
=% 0
~ "T\ en
;0 r- -4
~ :1>_
:I> --< CO
"T\ .... :I>
.-t 0 U)
~=.....
;0 V>
.....
.... en a::
% :I>
-., n U)
r- :I>
:I> r- en
--< ("")......
___ c= --i
c::a:-
:z: :c,.. --t
-i %
...........
en 0 -
...,
("").,.,...,
:I> ;0 -
r-O
r> ::!I: "T\
c: 0
r- - ::0
:I> ...,
-4 ..., :z>
......-r-
o r-
<:
""T'1:,:>,....,
;or-Cl
Oc:=
3:~"'"
-0
o 3:
:I> ......
--< "T\ =
,..,0--<
;0
o -0
"T\ m c:
JC:>:>
:I> c: ("")
0....=
c: -0 X>
_:0:: en
UJ,..,,..,
-%0
--< --<
.... CO
0-0,..,
= c:: ."
;00
<"> ;0
=......
X>
UJ_
,..,...,
0...,
:z:
:z>
-=
""0
...,
:J>
:z:
o
I\)
o
~e,.....&.-...)- :z:::
o
-4
m
--i ::c::J - ___
c:::a ,.." :z: :z:
-0 -4 ."
--0 ,-- rr1 ,--
:lO :D ::0 ::J:>
O(""')(TI-t
<mtn-..
~X--tO
0...... =
""'%0
........2:0
." =
:::> <"> <">
::::CCDofT1
UJ "0 Cl
r---t_C:::
m -1_
< ___ Do ""C
fT1 en r- :z
r- m
X> ." :z:
o -I c:: -t
;0 :z:
eo 0 <">
VOl.... 0
,-- ..H CD en
.... X>-4
mor-
X -., X> U)
-4 :z: m
r- :J> (""') -C
-< <"> ,..,
--< :I>
-C.......-t
:z: :I> UJ
<"> r- 0-.
;:c.... 2>."
...... -4
X> :I> -0
U).--Lnm
t-4 r-.H :c
=0
en :E: ""Ct :I>
.....m:z:
,- ::::a:: ::a :z
mm c:
<: X>::!I:
-<.,.,=
0%
:>:>C:
<"> :x
X>UJ
-0 :I>
.....r-
--< <:
:I> :I>
r-m
,..,
;0
....-,<:
U)X>
mr-
;oc:
<,..,
m
UJ
:J>
;0
m
-4
o
=
,...,
c::
en
m
<:>
:E
=
......
:z:
X>
<:
X>
....
r-
X>
CO
r-
,...,
,...,., rTl""-';1Ot'T'IU)G';co
:z: .0 'Z: m ,C) :Do ,..., tT'I
o C:::-t-oC:z::z::c:n
......... .......mX>.-t.........,,___
:z:: '"'CXJ-<-o-t;CJ;z:
G') 2m3 :J>X>:::t:
mtn-c(""');gr-_
CD ::a:::: --I ,.., -< z::
X> --I. CX:I ..,.,cn
,-- ...... " -t en c:
:J> -0 :z:: __ m :z: co
:z: c=(""),--......:cOX>
(""') ::OOOZI"'r1 r-
m n3X>--<XJ X>
::c ,.,., :z: fT1 :z:
X> :0 ." (""')
U) . fII)~C:= ,...,
,..., c:=
en .... U'1 :z: 0
~,HO
>-< r-
::0:::0
-IX>
......:Jl -. :z:
<::> c.....t ...0...
...0 _0-- """0.
0-. 0-. co
eo 0-. VI
eo .... -.
-.
~
NI
eo NI
--a -" Ln
"" ""!Xl
VI co NI
NI 0-. .....
-
I~
NI
00
.....-
VI NI .....
~ 0...0
..., "".....
VI
00
!Xl "" ""
0-. VI .....
"" 0-......
~
"" --
c.,.., --......:1 .......
CO _ In .-.
~ ...0 l.r10
Ln ...orvOc:>
.A. .o-.r-..)iOCl
.-.
.
.~ ~
I "" eo
I"" ......
I ~
I co 00
"I~ C>
.. . ..0-.0
1- _.
I
I~ ~
t--;) I ""-Ji -.A
co I _ '"
I ~ ~
. COlJ"l.co
. co fJ1 -.A
.c.....a~l.I'I
1- _
I
I~
..... I ""
c......_c.....
I ~ ~
'''''''''
I 0-'
'''''''''
1-
1.--
-
eo
VI
VI
NI
VI
-
""
NI
NI
0-.
0-.
VI
0-. VI
""-
=0
0-. =
-
NI
- -
o 00..-.1
0""
..... 00
00 ...,""
""I~
.p... I U't-
...0 t -1J1-
1_ -
~ I -.Jl..n
l.T1 I _-.J
"" I 0-
1-
~
""
VI 0-
= "" -0
"" --0
VI -0 .....
VI......
-
NI ~
= -
-0 ...... =
- -.a -.J
o ""......
0- ...........
-
~
""
NI ""
= = =
_ =-
VI "" =
co VI =
,
l.n 00 -0
00 ...,
00 .....
NI
....0
-0-0
""0-.
NI eo
VI =
NlOCO
""...........
......-""
VI = VI
C> 0-. ,."",
I.
I
I
I
I
I -0
I -0
I.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -0
I...,
, ......
-
"" 0_
00 -0_
= ""VI
o -0 -.
o 0-. -0
eo eo
..........
VI ""
-
NI
o
;:>-'NI
OVl
-0.....
NI
0-.
0-
""-
-0_
""NI
NI =
-0_
-.. =
-VI
--
""-
-0""
0-. VI
NI""
OVl
.....""
.....NI
NI
o-.NI 0
C> 0-. C>
-..... ""
-NI
...........
""0
NI
...,- 0
c.-o-. 0
-00 _
-""
0-......
--0
NI
0-...., 0
NlVI 0
...... NI VI
--
0- VI
""co
NI
-."" =
OLn t 00
=- .....
-NI
...... =
00...,
00-
==
0.....
---
.,.. .......--
(,.....t .c:-.-...~
lJ1 U'1 r-..,) c:> C> txI
co ~O"- c:::;. o~
co C::>W C> C>Ln
&:,....I ...o~ 0 oeo
---
1_ ___
I VI -
I...... ......
I ~ ~
r--..) I -.J-O
~ I CO.c...c:>
I ~OO
I-
I ___
I
C,.o..I,-~ c.......
Lr1 ........:J (r.I
1_
-.A I ~-"r-..,)
c.,...., I CO~IJ"I
t..o..I r WlJ10
.- -
1-
_1_
NI I ""
-.I I (J1 to..,)
I ~ ~
-1--
[X) I ......0""'"
0. l...oln
I-
I
NI 1___
...... I VI
~ I O-..A
1- -
L.n . -~
, _eo
...0 I L.n.a:..-
I-
-..
=L.n
=co
0=
=""
-..
0-
=NI
0....
=-
-
VI...... ""
_OVl
Vlc:>......
NI=""
_01'..,
-.. ""
=-..
=-
=co
00
-0
...,
VI
-
...,
-0
=
...,
-0
...,
NI
00
o
o
... r>
X>....
U>-<
=-<
.,,=
r- ."
=
:EUJ
=
-00
XJ;o
0,..,
c.... a::
mo
<">0
--<0
....
o
:z:
UJ
""
=
o
NI
o
00
NI
NI
=
=
-..
NI
00
=
00
NI
o
o
-0
""
o
-
o
NI
00
-
NI
=
-
NI
+4-
...
.,. .,. ::T
COCO;>>
-0 II> :>
~nlO
... ::T CO
o CO 0-
CD a..
... c 0-
eD _____<
::> CO
.... 0- -0
:E
0....
_CD "'"
-0 _.
....-....
.,....CD
en:;
o CD....
x-.. 0
CO .,.
... ::>
::>....-
0- .,.
_0
0-.... BI
co
!51 1iI-
-0 00
:::r-o......
0....00
>< ...,
. VI
....
0'<
CO
_l>>
-0'"
..Q
.....-
_.
--
CD
CD
l>> l>>
u>::>
-.0-
u>
::>
n
-
c
0-
CO
III
.
% c:
I~~~~W~~~~~W~~~~~~~NN_~~ 0%
I~W-O~~~~~w~-~~~~~~~_~ ~
-<
(J)ClO ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... _. Ct
~~~~~~...o~~~....ooo~~w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m
m~~~~~--ooo~~~moo~~~~~~...o~~~~~~ ~
mO ~ ~
~3~~~~~~~~~~X~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ OO~Oomo ~~o~oom~OCONOOO~300 ~
~ ~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~o~~~~~=~>>n~~ ~
% ~OOO~OO~~~ O~~QO~~OOO ~OO~ n~ ~
c ~~ 0 ~~ ~ x n ~~O ~
>> ~ ~~~~~m~~~~ ~~~~n~~~~~~L.n mm~ 0
~ m~~~~~~ ~~~~(J)~~~~~~~~~~OO~~~ ~ ~
~~~~o~~~>> ~E-~O~~~OO ~O~~~~~
~ m=OOOOOO~~~omooo~ oOo~mo x~OO
C ~O~ ~ ~~~30 m ~Q ~ OOO~O~~~~
~ ~ 3~ ~3nm~XO~~% ~~~ >> ~ ~~
~ ~~ ~W~>>~ ~~~~>>~o.>>~o~~~o~~ mx
~ O~~~E~~~ ~ 3~>>~~~C~c~m~c~~ ~~
~ ~~~~m ~ ~ ~ n~X~m 33~C3x~
WE~>>m~~~ N ~~~m~ ~~ n~o~
~. -:t -0 ....... .. ;o;a :ac rrI
~ tXJmO (N
X> ,..,;c~
-< <:> c::
"0
(..o.j ~ fJ1 0"'-
-- -----..:--.
...0 ...0 ..0 ..0
t.N (..0..1 l"oo.,) r-J
_~~__~~fJ1~~_*__~__~~______~__~
~ fJ10 0 fJ1~~~ O~O ~00fJ10fJ10fJ1~
+4-
~-~~~---~-~~-~--~----~~-~~---
o~ooo~~~o~~~~o~~o...o~~~~o~oo~~~
o~ooo~~..o-~O~~O~~O~~~~~o~oo..o~~
~~O~~~~~O~~~OO~~~~~~~~fJ1~fJ1N~~~fJ1
- - -
_N ___ -----~_~_~~O_~~ ~__
~I~O~O~~_~_~~~~~O.~OQ~~O~~OO~
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ ... - - ~ - - - ,. - ,.
fJ1 ~~~o~~-~o-.fJ10~~O~~O~O~OOO~O~O
o ~rooo~..o~QO~OOOOO~OOO~OOOOOO~
o ~fJ100fJ1fJ1000000000fJ1000~OOOOOOO
I
I
"" I
-I~,...,,;)
I _ ~
0--. . l.rI L.n
0... . 00
~ 100
I
I
NI I
NI I
...... I
""
eo
.....
...;.
00
-
""
o
""
L.n
-0
-
-0
VI
o
""
VI
.....
r-.>
""
=
...,
....
.....
-0
.....
VI
I
"" I
"'"' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NI I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NI I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
VI I
..... I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
0-. I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
VI I
VI I ...,
1_
-.. I 0
I NI
o I eo
I
I
"" I
0-.. I
"" I
I
I
""
=
NI
-
-..
=
!Xl
=
""
"" eo
=eo
-0-
-co
NI
""
=
"'"'
""
=
""
"-3
eo
.....
""
co
00
0-
=
o
-0
NI
=
00
......
""
VI .
I
.
I
- I
...... I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_,
"'"' I
VI I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VI I
...... I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
NI I
I
I
I
,
.
......
NI
......
""
.... =
NI VI
- =
co -0
""
""
co
co
""
VI
NI
-=
VI VA
""......
NI_
-
-
V>
~..)
""
NI
o
...,
......
co
NI
..Q
=
""
-
""
VI
VA _
eo ""
_ eo
......
..Q
...,
VI
=
-
0- ""
eo c....
""
...... =
-
VI
-
0-
0-
0-..
...,
co
-..
-.l
...,
eo 0-
"" -
= ""
eo =
- .....
-..
-..
o
-
VI
""
NI-
NlNI
-.. ""
VI -0
=-0
-
""
VI
VI
0-
0-..
......
-.. ......
NINI
""""
.....-
.....-
-
""
-..
.....
.....
eo
VI
-
0-
NI
-
o
.....
.....
NI
=
r-.>
""
......
NI
VI
eo
......
......
NI
.....
-
=
NI
-.. =
"" 0-..
0- .-
0- ""
eo
VI
NI
""
=
.....
-
""
NI
NI
-0
""
-0
.....
-
-
VI
""
::>
0-
-..
......
...,
NI"-3
..Q ..0
L.n L.n
VI VI
eo eo
""
0-
0-.
.....
-..
=
.-
-0
NI
VI c.-
..... -..
"" ""
VI ""
NI
"" .....
.... NI
0-. _
= VI
0- eo
""
eo
eo
-
..0
NI
-0
eo
"'"'
L.n NI
_-0
""
VI -..
NI-
--
-..
-.l
o
I NI
10
,=
10
,
I
I
I
I
, NI
'00
10
I
I
I
I
NI I
VI I
I NI
= I 0
1=
-.. I NI
I
I
.>
.
I
I r-.>
10
1=
'''''
I
I
I
I
I
I NI
100
100
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I NI
,=
10
I VI
1
""
eo
NI
eo 0
o
..Q -0
o :J>
%> <">
-4C
,...,
.-.r--
-<....
Xl""
UJm
XI -<
,..., ::0
-0
r-O
<"> .,.,
"'"
--<
=
.....
co U)
X>-4
00'
....
U) ...
=
U)
-<
--.
-
-0
...,
-
...,
..Q
l.n
-0
-0
.....
...,
-0
......
-0
..Q
eo
..Q
...,
..Q
,...,
10
c:
......
-0
"'"
m
=...
--< .....
::0 -<
CD :;0-<
< ......
-00
-0 r- ."
"-.%>
~~(.I')
N rra :c:
"~'::&:O
"",...,Xl
"":z: ......
--< ::IE:
<::>
U>o
('"",0
=
,...,
o
=
r-
,...,
""
o
o
0-
",
o
o
-..
NI
=
o
co
NI
o
00
:J>
-0
-0
,..,
:z::
o
.....
><
....
<:
NI
o
..
NI
o
NI
.
.
PARKS & TRAILS
Park Priorities:
wi th the defeat of the referendum for park improvements in the
Spring of 1993, the Park Commission has revised the Park Capital
Improvement Program. The following priorities were established:
1) Installation of modern playground equipment in each of
the parks (1993-1995);
2)
Relocation of the Cathcart ballfield and construction of
a parking lot in Cathcart to improve safety (1994);
3)
Completion of Silverwood Park amenities
exception of a shelter building (1994);
with the
4) Concession stand/storage building in the softball/soccer
area of Freeman Park. Sports organizations can pay the
City back over several years (1994);
5) Lighting for at least one softball field to allow girls
and adult softball leagues to play on the same nights
(1994) ;
6) Move the parking lot in Manor Park away from the
ballfield and closer to the pond (1995);
7)
Prepare and construct amenities at the planned family
area in Freeman Park (1995-1997); and
8) Funds in 1998, designated as contingency, could be
utilized to install drinking fountains in the parks.
Park Project Schedule:
The Park Capital Improvement Plan (PCIP) for 1994-1998 is shown
on the following page. The PCIP lists projects planned for each
year. Budget numbers are adjusted with an inflation factor and
should be considered the budget for the entire project including
"soft costs" such as planning, engineering, project management,
etc.
21
BADGER
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
CATIICART
RELOCATE BALLFIELD
PAR.K1NG LOT
PLAYGROUND EQUIPME1'.'T
MANOR
PICNIC AREA
LANDSCAPING
PAR.K1NG REFURBISH
SILVERWOOD
COURTS
PICNIC FACILITIES
LANDSCAPING
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEi'I'T
FREEMAN
BUILDING NORTII (L)
PLAYGROUND SOUTH
LIGHTS - SOFT BALL (L)
SHELTER-family area
PREPARE FAMILY AREA
PICNIC AREA
LANDSCAPING
ENTRANCE & SIGN
SIGNAGE
DRINKING FOUi'I'TAINS (2)
VOLLEYBALL COURT
TENNIS COURTS (3)
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL EXPENSES
. = $10,000 donated (cash or in kind)
L = Loan to Sports Organizations
1994 - 1998
PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (PCIP)
PROJECT SCHEDULE
1994
1995
1996
1997
"25.01)0
23,800
16,000
25,000
2.800
I lAOO
11 ,000
46,800
2,700
11,900
24.000
30,000
*24.000
50,000
18,000
15.000
10,000
5.700
12,500
6,400
5.700
12,500
5.700
60.000
229,200
108.200
58.500
60.000
22
"
1998
30,000
30,000
C:\PCIP\930922 SIl
.
.
Park Fundin~:
As playground equipment is installed in Freeman and Manor Parks
and as a shelter building is built in Manor Park in 1993, the
1994 Park Fund beginning balance is estimated to be $24,000. This
is shown below on the Funding Source Summary - Park Capital Fund
which illustrates where funds will corne from to pay for the
improvements scheduled on the PClP. Note that the
"projects/expenditure" line corresponds with the "total expenses"
line on the PClP.
Fundin~ Source Summary:
Balance, January 1
Park Dedication Fees
General Fund Contribution
Donations
General Fund Balance
Tfr - Mortg Balloon - CD
Foundation - Park Maint.
Foundation - Park Imp.
Foundation - Lights Loan
Foundation - Building Loan
Projects/Expenditures
Freeman Park Reserve
Tfr to General Fund - Maint
Interest Income @ 4%
PARK CAPITAL FUND
1994
24,000
22,500
50,000
10,000
50,000
87,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
6,000
(229,200)
(10,000)
(10,000 )
606
1995
1996
1997
1998
30,906
22,500
40,000
10,000
11,430
17,500
30,000
16,759
17,500
10,000
264
17,500
o
20,000
10,000
10,000
6,000
(108,200)
(10,000)
(20,000)
224
20,000
20,000
10,000
6,000
(58,500)
(20,000)
(20,000)
329
20,000
20,000
10,000
6,000
(60,000)
(20,000)
(20,000)
5
20,000
20,000
10,000
6,000
(30,000)
(20,000)
(20,000)
75
Balance, December 31
---------------------------------------------------
11,430
16,759
264
3,839
30,906
The Park Capital Improvement Fund is established to finance
improvements in the City's park system. Revenues are derived
from park dedication fees from land subdivisions within the
City, budgeted transfers from the General Fund, donations and
the Freeman Park Foundation. A one-time transfer of a mortgage
balloon payment on a Contract for Deed which the City holds
is a funding source in 1994. Expenditures shown are for
improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be
allocated to future park improvements.
This "funding formula" utilizes funds from various sources to
build an early balance to undertake planned projects. The plan
calls for the General Fund contribution to be reduced each year
from $50,000 in 1994 to $0 in 1998. This removes the General Fund
contribution to park improvements altogether.
23
.
Federal and state funding for recreation continues to
decrease;
.
Foundation Concept:
The Park Commission intends, with the full blessing of the City
Council, to work with the local sports organizations to provide a
framework for the pooling of funds and human resources to
maintain and improve facilities at Freeman Park. The need for
some sort of organized effort, whether it be informal or a more
formal foundation or non-profit corporation, has been identified
by the Park Commission. The following observations draw the Park
Commission to this conclusion:
. There is increasing pressure to reduce the use of
property tax dollars for park improvements;
. A park improvement referendum was defeated in the
Spring of 1993 which means borrowing funds is not an
option;
. There is increasing pressure for more and better
facilities for organized sports at Freeman Park;
. Improvements likely funded from the "foundation" would
clearly benefit those who participate in organized
sports. This would add to the general quality of life
for the entire Shorewood Community and open up the
potential for more residents and civic organizations to
participate in recreational activities.
Although such an organization has not been conceived, it will be
referred to in the document as the "foundation". Although the
plan calls for an influx of funds from various sources early on,
the "foundation" will pay back the park fund for "fronting" the ...
costs of building a concession/shelter building at the
softball/soccer area and installing lights on one or more
softball fields. This allows more softball organizations to play
there and more revenues to be made through the sale of
concessions. As time goes on, the "foundation" repays the Park
Fund, picks up a greater share of general park maintenance costs
and sets aside funds for future capital improvements to the park.
24
TRAILS
Past public opinion surveys have indicated a strong interest in
trail development in Shorewood. The city adopted a trail plan in
1992. with this Capital Improvement Plan resources are allocated
and a trail implementation plan is adopted. The trails identified
on this trail project schedule are along streets which are likely
to be worked on over the next five years and along those not
likely to need reconstruction for at least ten years.
Trail Project Schedule
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
.
300' A SILVERWOOD PARK TO POND 3,000
3.200' W SILVERWOOD PARK NATURE
TRAIL NORTH TO HWY. 7 4,000
2,100' C OLD MARKET ROAD
OFF-STREET TRAIL 39,000
2.500' A FREEMAt'\1 TRAILS 24,000
$ 70,000
2,600' A STRAWBERRY 25,000
1Jl LAKE LI!\i'DEN 24,000
6, C YELLOWSTONE TRAIL 108,000
2,300' A COUNTRY CLUB 22,000
$ 179,000
4.200' C SMITHTOWN ROAD
(COUNTRY CLUB TO EUREKA)
67,000
$ 67,000
G GRAVEL
A ASPHALT
C CONCRETE
W WOODCHIPS
C: \PCIP\ TRAILP IT.SCD
25
.
Fundin2 Source Summary:
The following funding source summary illustrates where dollars
will come from to fund this project schedule:
TRAIL FUND
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Balance, January 1 11,000 73,950 99,399 45,797 72,723
Tfr - Cap. Reserve Fund 85,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
5% from street Fund 7,500 8,500 9,500 10,500 11,500
Tfr - MSA 39,000 46,000 67,000 .
ISTEA Grant 54,000
Trail Construction (70,000) (179,000) (67,000)
Interest Income @ 4% 1,450 1,949 898 1,426 1,984
---------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31 73,950 99,399 45,797 72,723 101,207
The Trail Fund is established to finance the implementation
of the City's Trail System plan. Revenues are derived from
budgeted transfers from the Capital Reserve Fund, Street Fund and
MSA Fund, and anticipated ISTEA grants. Expenditures shown are
improvements funded from these sources. Fund balances will be
allocated to future trail improvements.
The following pages are the individual park site improvement
plans and the trail plan.
26
.
.
~
~afl9"'t: '
~ or,,~
~H.!~". E/i'i'W.'.~,
j. / //:t."
I; , < /'
;-
'/Ofl
//
(: Ii If /
I: I "
\ ': \: I
\ \ I ~
'-.~ \ Ii Iro
~ II) I
I '1
,I
H"
~~!
~~ i
~~~
~~!
~rt
, OJ.
... ~ ~
~:
jl
H~~
~~;: ;-
~~l.!
ij!l
HO:
~:; Il
l'-!
,
.
>>
~
>
>>
.
.
>>
n
>>
.
>
g
n
o
.
~
g
!
0""
I
--
I
I
/
)
-------
~
s::
'"
en
~
;eD
."
ii"
::l
- r
SILVERWOOD PARK
mm
gO
~ f
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
7300 Metro Blvd. . Suite 525
~inneo.polis, MN 55439 . (612)83549960
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
L~nd UlelEn"irQn,nenlill _ PlanninvDes'~n
27
~ ~-t
~~i
m
j..i=.,
'.'
~!!
m
'n
F
.l
~ [ ! ~ ~
i
~ :
n~~ i 5
ij"~~ ~ I ;i
~i;} j :.
iJ~i
lJ ~{
1111
~t~~
,li
".
B:" ~.
~ l!
.
~-'
\
'-
'-
."
/'
/
/
/
//----- ---_/
- '------\~
,
-::':J'dl'\:'l'J _----
0.,,0':-- ,.._--
~-
~- --
i~
0:
'"
'"
~
.
"
,
~
.
"
.
"
o
,
~
o
I
~
~
"C
ilj
::>
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
7300 ytetro Blvd. . Suite 525
.\1inn~apolis. MN 55439 . (6] 2)835-9960
CATHCART PARK
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
2(3
~,
I'
..
~
/
/
! I
I,
mm
DO
LUG Ule/Eny,ronmen'll . ?1.nll;n(/De"~lI
.
.
Hi
., -
i~~
<."H'i
H
.
I"
l~
"
~ [
\
\~
~ ':; ~;! z
to, ,
~~q' ;l
;rO!.i,f
ml
!~,..~
i;~
~l:
~,tg
p'~
,
-----....
I
/
./'
~
a:
'"
en
5 ~ ~
'" "
:t '"
::l
~ ~
MANOR PARK
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
7300 Metro BI....d. . Suire 525
Minneapolis. YfN 554.39 . (612)835.9960
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
mm
DO.
!..JIlQ U~eiEn"1Tonm..nl1! . PlJ~niogJDe!;~n
~
~
!
~
j
WI
~~}
ni
~!-
li. "
t.!
~~"
;-.~
If.
;,
II
~ ~
\
__-.i
COUNTRY
ROAD I r
\
\
~lif ~..
1r1-~;'
U!i:
Pt~
ih
H.!i
-il~
~!i
p'a
.
"
o
S
'::.
-'.
"
o
7
o
z
o
.S)
r
(
\
~~
~
..
'"
~
>
~
.
,
.
.
.
o
~
o
o
.
!
~
!
"C
or
:l
~ 1
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
7300 Metro Blvd. . Suite 525
Minneapolis. MN 55439 . (612)835.9960
BADGER PARK
City of Shorewood, Minnesota
30
.
mm
DII
L.~nd U~"fEnwHon",e"lal . ?hn"'n~fDell~n
.
.
Ht 11 F 2
U t ,i, ~
~1 UP
Ja' ;r~
!~IIJi
Ifl "m
1~ iii
~ i. ;(
~~~=-~--~-
"0--:='..--- - ---~ /_:Tqt-\... I,
'111\ "-~' /' "
',1\' -,\ \ ( /---
;\\.\\\ '\, "-- \.'
;!\\~tf~~"c- ,I
.' '
/
-\--------
:;::~-
;.~o
~~~
o i~ ~
.;;:g:r;
:t?=
z~~
~.o
~s.~
..::;;~
"T1
i.
~~
i"
~l
~.
p
;!
:li
~~
::i
.
-\ ,
\.:.
"
,
'>-
. ~ ~...
, ,
\ ,- -:-~ ) t \
\~
"01,.\
/-'
j
I
i
_~=_ - I
, l
j-
~I':-
I_
.
- :;
~-
31
.... - .... ...... ..... -- -
.
.
111 IHlll
II II
I:P I ;; t
ill i II J;;
~; j H ~
~ . , .
il I'
'I '1
II I
II
!
~
~
~ I
- i
.
k1J
I
I
I
II i
.
a . r,~~
a . lit
a .,,~
a . ";'1',
a .!iir
n
:;0
m
V\
n
m
Z
-i
~ ~
i i
~ ~
I I
"II :;:
~, ~
i -a
lr
~ i
~
2 >- t;' I"l
II a ~
a ~ t
3 .. ~ ':
-i ! " ;!-
!. I"l ..
..
0 ..
a
a
"
"
~
-i
!.
r-
S'
I"
-i
!.
'0 '0
~ ~
~I a i!
~!
:l:~
~ ~ ~n <9
i~ ~ ~ ;
...E ~ Ii ;;
"
~!
B~
f It
W
n
o
::J
Co
"l:l
....
o'
....
~'
:;J
~
'T1
5'
...
"l:l
::3.
o
....
~'
....j
....
~
w
(JQ
s
o
::J
fj;
w
(JQ
s
o
::J
fj;
~
: ~
\
,
....'4
t
~
"1:1("1
a _.
1~
a.c
~"'"
i.1
:;00
~=r
~c
~""I
a ttl
~
C
C
Q..
~
""I
cw
-.
-
~
-
cw
=
w
l\) (J)
tI'
0
I
g '"
"'U
iii" -<
::J Ii
. ~i
> V\
~ -g
>
:;0
,..
..
UNSCHEDULED, POTENTIAL PROJECTS
The following projects have been identified as potential future
projects which have been discussed in general terms. At this time
there is not enough information or need to assign a year to these
potential projects:
. The Mound Fire Department is recommending up to three
dry hydrants be installed at Shorewood's Islands to
improve water availability for fire suppression
purposes. At this writing a written recommendation or
cost estimate has not been received. Decisions will
need to be made on type, location and funding source
for such dry hydrants.
.
One project which would be considered is to expand the
City Council Chambers to the north (to the parking lot
curb). This could more than double seating capacity
which would make the chambers more useable for large
meeti~gs and hearings.
. At some point in time the City may be interested in
providing a satellite fire station in the western
portion of the City.
.
. The City might wish to participate with Hennepin County
and the City of Tonka Bay to improve traffic movement
on County Road 19 at its intersection with Country Club
Road.
. Upgrade the storm water system from Church Road to
Grant Lorenz.
.
.
There is a serious erosion problem along a 200 foot
section of the lake side of Timber Lane. A cost
effective plan needs to be agreed upon so cost
estimates can be acquired and the project undertaken.
. Due to technological advances and expanding use,
funding will need to be identified to upgrade and
improve the current computer system. New ways to
collect, use and maintain data are being researched by
staff to make us more efficient and a better service
organization.
33
TYPE
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE
PROJECT/PURPOSE
..
FUNDING AMOUNT
AMOUNT SOURCE PER SOURCE
------------------------------------------------------~-------------------------------------
WATER
STREETS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
PARKS
TRAILS
WATER
STREETS
DRAINAGE
EQUIPMENT
PARKS
- CATHCART
- SILVERWooD
- FREEMAN
- BADGER
- CATHCART
- MANOR
- FREEMAN
1994
OVERHAUL WOOD HAVEN WELL
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
T.H. 7/VINEHILL ROAD CONNECTION
OVERLAY PROJECTS
CITY HALL/BADGER PARK PARKING AREA
BADGER WELL BUILDING
CITY HALL COPIER
REPLACE 1989 FORD F350 DUMP
BROOM FOR TORO TRACTOR
SPEED AWARENESS DISPLAY
RELOCATE BALLFIELD
PARKING LOT
COURTS
PICNIC FACILITIES
LANDSCAPING
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
BUILDING NORTH
PLAYGROUND SOUTH
LIGHTS - SOFTBALL
SILVERWooD PARK TO POND
SILVERWooD PARK TO T.H. 7
OLD MARKET ROAD OFF-STREET
FREEMAN PARK TRAILS
1995
TRUNK EXTENSIONS
OVERLAY PROJECTS
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
- MSA PROJECTS - COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
GLEN ROAD AREA
REPLACE 1985 FORD F250 4X4
REPLACE 1985 FORD L8000 DUMP
REPLACE 1985 926 CAT LOADER
REPLACE 1988 FORD F250 4X4
REPLACE 1988 TORO GROUNDSMASTER
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
PICNIC AREA
LANDSCAPING
REFURBISH PARKING AREA
SHELTER - FAMILY AREA
PREPARE FAMILY AREA
FUNDING SOURCE KEY
------------------
CR - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
OF - DRAINAGE FUND
ER - EQUIPMENT REPLCMT FUND
GF - GENERAL FUND
GR - GRANTS
MSA - MUNICIPAL STATE AID
PF - PARK CAPITAL FUND
SA - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
34
25,000
10,000
18,000
80,000
'90,000
25,000
12,500
16,669
2,500
12,500
23,800
16,000
46,800
2,700
11 , 900
24,000
30,000
24,000
50,000
3,000
4,000
39,000
24,000
25,000
80,000
50,000
199,000
17,170
64,386
109,881
17,170
18,779
25,000
25,000
2,800
11,400
11,000
18,000
15,000
WF
WF
WF
SR
CR
WF
GF
ER
ER
ER
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF
TF
TF
TF
WF
SR
MSA
OF
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
25,000
10,000
18,000
80,000
90,000
25,000
12,500
16,669
2,500
12,500
23,800
16,000
46,800
2,700
11,900 .
24,000
30,000
24,000
50,000
3,000
4,000
39,000
24,000
25,000
80,000
50,000 /
199,000
17,170
64,386 .
109,881
17,170
18,779
25,000
25,000
2,800
11,400
11 , 000
18,000
15,000
SR - STREET RECONST FUND
SS - SANITARY SEWER FUND
TF - TRAIL FUND
WF - WATER FUND
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE
..
TYPE
PROJECT/PURPOSE
FUNDING AMOUNT
AMOUNT SOURCE PER SOURCE
1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER
STREETS
TRUNK EXTENSIONS
OVERLAY PROJECTS
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
- LOCAL - STRAWBERRY LANE
- SMITHTOWN LANE
- SHOREWOOD LANE
- MSA PROJECTS - LAKE LINDEN ROAD
- YELLOWSTONE TO COUNTR
- COUNTRY CLUB
25,000
80,000
297,000
97,000
97,000
200,000
230,000
300,000
60,000
12,399
22,750
153,135
15,919
DRAINAGE
EQUIPMENT
GRANT LORENZ AREA
REPLACE 1977 ROSCOE ROLLER
REPLACE 1976 FMC JETTER
REPLACE 1976 120G CAT GRADER
REPLACE 1991 BOBCAT 743
P~
- FREEMAN
PREPARE FAMILY AREA
PICNIC AREA
LANDSCAPING
ENTRANCE AND SIGN
SIGNAGE
DRINKING FOUNTAINS (2)
VOLLEYBALL COURT
STRAWBERRY
LAKE LINDEN
YELLOWSTONE TRAIL
COUNTRY CLUB
10,000
5,700
12,500
6,400
5,700
12,500
5,700
25,000
24,000
108,000
22,000
TRAILS
1997
lATER
TRUNK EXTENSIONS
25,000
'iTREETS
OVERLAY PROJECTS
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
- LOCAL - CHRISTMAS LANE
- DELLWOOD LANE
- MALLARD LANE
- TIMBER LANE
REPLACE 1987 FORD L8000 DUMP
REPLACE 1987 FORD L8000 DUMP
REPLACE 1990 JOHN DEERE AMT622
TENNIS COURTS (3)
80,000
36,000
67,000
55,000
103,000
72,344
72,344
5,667
60,000
.
EQUIPMENT
PARKS - FREEMAN
FUNDING SOURCE KEY
WF
SR
SR
SR
SR
MSA
MSA
MSA
OF
ER
SS
ER
ER
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF
TF
TF
TF
WF
SR
SR
SR
SR
SR
ER
ER
ER
PF
25,000
80,000
297,000
97,000
97,000
200,000
230,000
300,000
60,000
12,399
22,750
153,135
15,919
10,000
5,700
12,500
6,400
5,700
12,500
5,700
25,000
24,000
108,000
22,000
25,000
80,000
36,000
67,000
55,000
103,000
72 , 344
72 , 344
5,667
60,000
CR - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
OF - DRAINAGE FUND
ER - EQUIPMENT REPLCMT FUND
GF - GENERAL FUND
GR - GRANTS
MSA - MUNICIPAL STATE AID
PF - PARK CAPITAL FUND
SA - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
SR - STREET RECONSTR FUND
SS - SANITARY SEWER FUND
TF - TRAIL FUND
WF - WATER FUND
35
"
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE
..
TYPE
PROJECT/PURPOSE
AMOUNT
FUNDING AMOUNT
SOURCE PER SOURCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER
STREETS
1998
TRUNK EXTENSIONS 25,000 WF 25,000
OVERLAY PROJECTS 80,000 SR 80,000
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
- LOCAL - PLEASANT AVENUE 67,000 SR 67,000
- EXCELSIOR BLVD 326,000 SR 326,000
- MSA - SMITHTOWN ROAD, COUNTRY CLUB
TO EUREKA ROAD 540,000 MSA 540,000
REPLACE 1987 FORD L8000 DUMP 76,685 ER 76,685
REPLACE 1988 MOBILE SWEEPER 143,146 ER 143,146
REPLACE 1991 TORO GROUNDSMASTER 19,165 ER 19,165
CONTINGENCY 30,000 PF 30,000
SMITHTOWN ROAD - COUNTRY CLUB TO EUREKA 67,000 TF 67,000
EQUIPMENT
PARKS
TRAILS
CR - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
OF - DRAINAGE FUND
ER - EQUIPMENT REPLCMT FUND
GF - GENERAL FUND
GR - GRANTS
MSA - MUNICIPAL STATE AID
PF - PARK CAPITAL FUND
SA - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
SR - STREET RECONSTR FUND
SS - SANITARY SEWER FUND
TF - TRAIL FUND
WF - WATER FUND
.
FUNDING SOURCE KEY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES- BY SOURCE
----------------------------------------
SOURCE CODE 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 TOTALS
_.---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAP. RESERVE FUNDS CR 90,000 90,000
DRAINAGE FUND DF 199,000 150,355 349,355
EQUIPMENT REPLACE. ER 31,669 227,386 181,453 238,996 679,504 .
GENERAL FUND GF 12,500 12,500
GRANTS GR 0
MUNCPL STATE AID MSA 50,000 730,000 540,000 1,320,000
PARK CAPITAL FUND PF 229,200 108,200 58,500 60,000 30,000 485,900
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SA 0
STREET. RECONSTRUCT SR 80,000 80,000 571,000 341,000 473,000 1,545,000
SANITARY SEWER SS 22,750 22,750
TRAIL FUND TF 70,000 179,000 67,000 316,000
WATER FUND WF 78,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 178,000
-------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ANNUAL CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUNDING
591,369
689,586 1,767,703
576,355 1,373,996 4,999,009
36
..
..
III. CAPITAL FINANCE PLAN
The City recognizes the importance of maintaining a reasonable
funding level for public improvements, equipment, and
depreciation of current City assets. Therefore this CIP projects
an increase of between 3 to 4 percent annually in general
revenues allocated for capital improvements.
The first chart of the Funding Source Summary projects the
property tax levy for capital improvements through 1998 and
identifies expenditures by type of improvement. The capital
Reserve Fund Chart summarizes all capital anticipated revenues
and expenditures. Each functional area summarized here is
explained in detail in the funding source summary chart in each
functional area.
.
Maintaining a reasonable Capital Reserve fund balance is an
essential element in the financial stability of the City. It can
be an important factor in.maintaining and improving our good bond
rating. Such a reserve can serve as a sound financial resource.
It can serve as a depreciation fund for City Assets. In addition,
it can allow for short term or interim internal borrowing for
projects or equipment. This can reduce the cost of borrowing by
allowing for combined bond sales at the most advantageous time.
The last portion of the Capital Finance Plan is a proposed 1994
Capital Improvement Budget. It adopts, as a budget, the projects
identified in this document for the year 1994 and authorizes
purchases and preliminary project expenses up to and including a
feasibility study for those projects pending Council approval of
appropriate agreements. This budget needs to be adopted by the
city council an action separate from acceptance of this plan.
.
37
"
.,
.l
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL APPROPRIATIONS
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Street Reconstruction
Storm Drainage
Equipment Replacement
Park Capital
Capital Reserve
230,000
10,000
94,500
50,000
250,000
10,000
99,225
40,000
270,000
10,000
104,186
30,000
290,000
10,000
109,396
10,000
10,000
310,000
10,000
114,865
11,275
Total General Fund
Capital Levy
384,500
399,225
414,186
429,396
446,140
A summary of General Fund capital levies is shown above.
Capital Levy is budgeted in the General Fund as transfers to
the various capital improvement funds. The increase in general
capital improvements levy each year ranges from 3.67% to 3.92%.
.
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
---------------------------------------------------
Undesig. Balance, January 1 119,346 41,933 27,472 12,721 7,875
General Fund Contribution 384,500 399,225 414,186 429,396 446,140
General Fund Balance 25,000
Tfr. from Capital Fund Bal. 70,000 , .
Transfers: Park Capital (50,000) (40,000) (30,000) (10,000) 0
Equipment Repl. (94,500) (99,225) (104,18'6 ) (109,396) (114,865)
Street Reconstr. (230,000) (250,000) (270,000) (290,000) (310,000 )
Storm Drainage (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000)
Trails (85,000) (15,000) (15,000) ( 15 , 000 ) (15,000)
City Hall Improvements (90,000)
Interest Income @ 4% 2,587 539 249 154 83
-----------------------------------------~---------
Undesig. Balance, Dec 31 41,933 27,472 12,721 7,875 4,233
The Capital Reserve Fund is established as a repository for
funds for anticipated future projects which have not been
formally ordered by the City Council. These projects include
public facilities and city hall improvement projects, and
others as may be identified. Funds are transfered to the
proper capital project fund, once established. The
expenditures shown are anticipated in the next five years.
Undesignated fund balances are allocated to future capital
improvement projects as specified by the City Council and may be
used as identified in the introduction to the Capital Finance Plan.
38
,] ~
.
.
~
~
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
FOR THE YEAR 1994
~EREAS,the Shorewood City Council wishes to carefully
plan and coordinate City public capital purchases and projects over
a five year period matching physical needs with financial
resources; and
~REAS, the City Council has adopted a
Improvement Program for the years 1994 through 19~8
purpose; and
Capital
for this
~EREAS,it is the intention of the city Council to have
the first year of the five year capital Improvement Program
document serve as the capital budget for year 1994.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
hereby adopts those purchases and projects identified to be made in
the year 1994 in the Project Schedule of the 1994-1998 Capital
Improvement Program (attached hereto) as its 1994 capital
Improvement Budget.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the adoption of said budget
authorizes purchases, and preliminary project expenditures up to
and including feasibility study for those projects identified to be
undertaken in the year 1994 pending City Council approval of
appropriate agreements and operating budget adjustments.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this
day of , 1993.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
39
.
;":t
n
'0';,
jl) ,"
~ ::l*
::r g":!1 II
H~ I
8 a ~ "~
: ~. ~ I
~~~!l
1 ~ ~.I
~ '~
m
4
!!?
.....
o ;I>
el .-.
.-. .....
o
g g" el
~ ~ g I
@"~ ~ a
i!. :1
~.l e: I
o S. Cl>m
~ ~ [I
~ E-I
g. 0 .'~
::l1
)
;~x
;;::::
tt
e-
~ ~
a ~
'"0 ()
o ::r
2. ~.
~ClCl
.9.0
~ ::s
.-.
11
:.:.,
fJ
I
I
I
~
It
:~
~;*
.:~.
:...
1\1\
o
X
't:l
[
::s
~~
~ S
Ro ~.
~ g
.g s
o 0
CI> 0
g. g.
el O~
r1l 0
CI>
CI>
:3
o
g
.
}:::
.~*
0..
~
..... 0
ClCl X ~
::s '"0
0 .....
'"0 e1. t=:
t:t. ::s :3
0 Cil
f;l S.
el ~
~ 0
0.. ::s :3
'"0 8" 0
0 .., 0
CI> '"0 t:t.
CI> ::s
..... ..,
cr' .9. ClCl
..... 8
0 0
0
0 n
0
CI>
fij
1 ) ,
, i.f
)~: }
,:,*
.".:;:; ':'{
'.;~
:~* :::::-
;}~
:~~: il
:f1 ~ :'~
~~
.....
~: "':j:
::~~ ::.i(
..:... :;;:.:
Ii ::s 1
:~x ~ :jt
f
,~
"11 -:::~: 0 ii
0 M 0
:fi El ~:x
el :::*
5' i :3 :~*
S 0 f
':~ ::s [f~
~ $ .-.
0
Cil :::( ::s .:::,
::~:. '"0
'"0 I ~,;
B 0 ~;~
t:t. :;
.....
:J .....
1 0 i
ff ~ ~>;,
:;:::; 0.. "
:.>>
:;;:.:: '"0 J.
:~~:
@ a "
<.;;;.. :-~.
ij ~ "
:;I .....
:;f "
@ ,
I :1
1\1\
()
o
a.
~
I}l
CI>
o
CI>
CI>
El
o
::I
.....
.-.
o
()
o
C
::l
.-.
'<
;I>
c
~
.-.
o
..,
:1
;-;:;:
1
'I
1:
:1
M
:;J:
!l
'"0
Cil
'"0
~ ~
o e1.
::s .....
a.s.~
::s jl)
~ s.
::1.ClCl
::s ::s
ClCl 0
jl) .....
ClCl n.
Cil 0
s~
a
:~
';:;:
.:;~
ii
I
::;3
Il
:j~
t
j
i
J
;'::::
:~
:~
:::~
i:'
it
.;1
*
I
I
1-
I
I
I
~I
;~
i
I:,~,;
~
m
I
I
ill
u
'~
::~
m
;~
:'{
11
"I'
~~
,
1
~
I
'~
i
I
I.,:',
"
:~
:~
]
,.~
I
::~
*
","
e:ii
t:t ~
'g ",. '1:11
'III' s::;."" .;~i
'"0 0 OJ
in I
I}l ~. ~;i
~ ~ ~ ,;1
~ i g .~
~ g.~ I
o ill
P.,
,I
g
.}
:ti
~
~
cr'
~
Ro
o
o
:3
'"0
@
~
s.:
o
CI>
~.
!!?
o
CI>
~
'"0
~
Ro
El
e1.
.....
::r
o
~.
::s
ClCl
::s
o
t:t.
o
o
CI>
'1:1
Cil
'"0
~
'"0
~
CI>
Ro
~~~
:'~
',jj
",t, ,
:~
11
,;1
"
':::
:x
"J
:~
::;~
I
::~$
Ii
CI>
'"0
o
o
CI>
11
i1
j
:'i
':~
':::~
:*
}1
:p
~j
14
;i
I
1
;~t
.:1
I
.;.;.
:z~
,.~:.
:~;:;
::$;
:j~1
0..'"0
o Cil
~'"O
S ~
S. 0
o 0
cr'CI>
o M-
::s 0
o CI>
::tI g.
~ S
o..!!?
o
@~
jl) ..,
{<.o ~.
'g g
o g-
'"80..
Cl>ClCl
o 0
o..r
el Ro
CI>
o rJ
~ ::r
El 0
o g.
::s .....
fij ~C'!
:;;:5
Ii
"]i
;1
I
:;~
:~
.,~
W
:.;:~
I
:,::;;
.::~
:,1
m
:~~
~t1
::]
H
.;-:-
"{:;
'::~
Ii.
~x.
I
\I\I\I\I\^I\I
()
_.
r-l"
_.
N
(b
:;j
()
o
:;j
r-l"
PJ
n
r-l"
x;
1
I
~
M
1
!
'* I :~
::< ;I> Cil I
it ;
'"0 0 CI>
g: 0 ~ I
;, '"0 a r:
;I> f a ~ a: t:t. Cil ~ -:~
~ I 0 < 0 CI> ;.x
0 () 0 g-'g ~ ::s 0 0 !
..... 0 ~ '"0 ~ 0 r: ~ :~"=
0.. " '"0 I ..... s. cr' 0
.-. ~ ~ t:t.
~ :::: 0 1 t=: 0 ~
Ro ;::::: ~ 0 '"0 g '"0 ()
'; '"0 '"0 CI> 't:l 0 ..... ::1. a .f:l I
eo ':. 0 a ::r 0
g. ,~ .., ~ ..... '. Ro Cil ::s g-
o cr' 0 0 ~ '"0 s::::
el '"0 < ~. 't:l ClCl
:.~, ..... ~ 0' 0 0 a I
;~ 0 Ro 0.. i 0 '"0 :;j
'"0 CI> :# CI> ::s ~ ::3. ~ <
..... 0 0 Ro ClCl Cil D.
CI> :%: 0 S. ClCl 0 :~~
el 0.. Ro '"0 ~ -::*
CI> :# ~ .., g ~ .~, .......
CI> :3 I ~ ~ Il> Hl 0 ~ (JQ .~.,
0 .~ ~ ::s 0 ~ 0
CI> 0 CI> 0' So S. {<.o So ~ ~ .....
CI> ::s 0 o. [ ;::: (b
El .-. M CI> .., 0 0 '"0 0 0 .., :f:
CI> ~ ::1. .::::; a. ClCl Cil 0' c:r .. n
'"0 ::s 1 .~
0 S- ill :3 N tl Il> l c !:3" ......
::s CI> ] .., g, CIl
..... ':{ 0 e. 0 :;:;:: 0 11 r 0.. .'~ _.
a t=: 'I ~ 0 ",~ :3 (;> OQ '"0 0
0 ::r 0 j 0 '< ~ a ,~ :;j
..... ::r :} 0 ::s g ~ t:t. CI> el 0 <
..... ~. 0 8- 4
~. :1 ~ ::s ..... ...... 0 CIl
:::;:: 8" ::s ClCl cr' 'R i i
;':"1-
.::~. I ..... 0 '"0 .....
.:.~- ClCl ..... .., ~ :Jl
'" ...... S.
'::~ -< a:
OQ ~ 0 cr' '"0 f~
@ ::l .... ..... 0 0
I ~ ~ 0 Cil F. ':~:e
:~* ~'"'t '"0
4 0
w 1. ::3. ::~l
:':;~
J:;:-
0
.,
~
Ul
,....,.
PJ
l:::l
;:J>
n
r-l"
_.
<:
......
r-l"
......
(b
CIl
~
PJ
VI
[
~
~~
C/)&
....-
('D ~.
n n
~. ~
~S
>- 0
U)~I-t':l
U)OCJ)
(D<::r'
~8~
~ g ~
~M"o
M"~o
'1:j~o..
~ 0
~.~
n U)
M"
U)
()
~.
M"
)>
-a
-a
m
..z
c
><
"
..
,
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
DATE:
October 7, 1993
~
,r
I , '
UJ
FROM:
James C. Hurm, City Administrator
RE:
Garbage Alternatives - Issues
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
. Should the City organize garbage pickup as we do recycling?
. Vehicle weight - Because we want our streets to last as long
as possible and because many of our streets are on poor soils,
we should consider prohibiting the large garbage trucks and
requiring smaller trucks be used to empty into the large
trucks (4 ton/axle as in Code section 801.09; spring
restrictions) .
. Organized collection could limit garbage and recycling pickup
to one day rather than six days a week as it currently is now.
. Typically organized pickup saves each resident about $60 per
year (per survey data). That translates to a combined City-
wide savings of up to $144,000 per year ($60 x 2400
residences). For example:
Shorewood Tonka Bay Excelsior
3 Can Rate + $23.00 $14.67 $18.76
Recycling Fee
Annual Cost $276.00 $176.04 $225.12
Per Residence
Multiplied by x 2,400 x 2,400 x 2,400
# of Shorewood
Residences
Annual City- $662,400 $422,496 $540,288
wide Cost
savings $239,904 $122,112
This savings means that if Shorewood used the organized methods as
in Tonka Bay or Excelsior, and had their rates, significant savings
would be realized.
. The more restrictions placed (i.e. weight, same day
collection, etc.), the fewer the number of companies that can
compete. Smaller haulers who have done business in the area
for years may no longer be able to do so.
Garbage Alternatives - Issues
October 7, 1993
Page 2 of 2
OPTIONS TO CONSIDER
. License; increase fee to help pay for potential breakup;
. Require small load vehicles in the spring only;
. Require small load vehicles year around;
. Bid one hauler, one or more days, with recycling;
.
Leave as is; $50.00 base fee + $25.00 per truck
restrictions;
.
.
JHjtln
10793.2
,-'
..
,
no
TO:
Mayor and City council Members
Teri Naab, Deputy Clerk
~
.f
..
FROM:
DATE:
October 7, 1993
RE:
Garbage Al ternati ves - Comments on the Survey Information
The following are observations derived from the statistical data
compiled from a County survey:
. Only three cities have weight restrictions in place related to
garbage haulers, which only apply in the spring.
. There are obvious cost savings in having one Ci ty-wide
hauler/recycler (approximately $5.00 per month or $60.00 per
year). Many of the cities with organized collection have
included a recycling fee with the garbage rate, which should
be taken into consideration when comparing the rates.
. Only the larger contractors have the capability to handle
city-wide collection.
. All organized collection cities have recycling and garbage
picked up on the same day.
. Some cities have adopted an increased rate for those that do
not recycle.
. Many of the garbage haulers have indicated a willingness to
comply if the City requires smaller vehicles on residential
streets.
10793.1
"
..
SURVEY OF SMALL TRUCK AVAILABIL~TY
Chaska Sanitation: They have 2 smaller trucks available (empty:
10,000 lbs; full 12,500 lbs). They do not intend to purchase
pickups in the near future.
Gopher State Truckinq: They only have 1 large truck (empty: 12
ton; full: 18 ton), and do not intend to purchase smaller trucks
in the near future.
BFI: Currently does not use smaller trucks in Shorewood, but have
them available.
Blackowiak: They currently use 6 smaller trucks in Shorewood
(empty: 3 yd boxes; full: weigh as much as a small car).
Quality Waste Control: They only have 1 large truck available and
do not plan to purchase pickups in the near future.
Randy's Sanitation: They use 1 large truck (gross weight 45,000
lbs) and 1 smaller truck (16,000 lbs) in the City.
R & W Rolloff: No residential/commercial pickup in the City.
Waconia Sanitation: They have a small truck available, but
currently do not use it in the city.
Waste Management: Currently do not have smaller vehicles
available for residential use, but could make them available if the
City required it.
Westonka Sanitation: Currently they run a smaller truck (23,000 lbs
empty) but have a pickup available for use in the City. The owner
indicated that proper notice should be given so routes can be
reviewed prior to requiring the smaller vehicles.
Waste Technoloqy:
this time.
They do not have smaller vehicles available at
***
Many of the haulers indicated that if the City required smaller
vehicles to be used on'residential side streets, they could meet
the requirement.
"
.~
~ u
en Qt....
~ ::s .:;;
I- ~
E ~
U1
"" "'
.... ,.
~~
= ~
;:= -
:=
;=
'"
""
:=
I-
~
-'
C
'-'
<:>
~
z
<<
~
?
~
~..
~
c:
.,
.
..
.8
..
..
..
..
..
"
~ ::
o. "
~ e e _ e e _ . e _ e e e
Q) Q) (U CU Q,1 ~ OJ OJ cu m tJJ OJ It
~~ t; ~ ~ t; -t; ~ "t; t; t; ~ t; ~ ::
ilU >- >- >.. >~ >. >. >.. :>. >.. >.. >.. >. "
-Ultl\CI1Ultntf1V1t11U"1 tntltU1"
::l ..
"' c: c c: c: c: c: Co c: c: c: c: c: '1
.c. co Q,) Q) Q) Q) <U Q) Q,) CU IV Q) CIJ "
o. a.. o. c. Cl. O. CL 0.. Q. 0.. 0.. c... II
- 0 Ct <::) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 <::) 0 0' ::
.." U"1 U"1 U'l U"l .,
c-...._ ...-NO-C". C'I('-. "
-I I"~I_I__ 0
C". _.." Ln _ I <:> VI <:> In CI U"l C)
_V1_r-U'1V1r-')Q)U"lQ):Z'_:Z::
VI OJ _ '_ OJ ~ __>- __>- >-
">-'->->-->- >-
>- >- >-
..,
~
o
..
..,
,.
~
.!!
.0 _
~ U
"'
'-" -'
O'
~
.c. .c..c:: .I::..c
.....>.>.......>0..... .....>.,.....
>.c:......._ c:....... c: >..>..>.,C_ c:
-c:r.:w:~O~O___Q.:w:C
~lll!!Q)Q)E(DIE!l~~"-::.OJE!
Q) I IV OJ I OJ , OJ Q) m,' Q) I
Q) "- =- :a .- ~ ._ Q) IV Q) "_ ::it .....
3CO 0;, CC:Z:23c:IC CD
::g :?e~ Z;~~~~
-Lt...-_<E___ OU-LA.,..L.t...
~ = ~~c..!'
g'
o
E
U ~
,.. ..,
U .,
.., ....
""
~
..,
U
,.. .
U
~
""
c:
., . ~ c:
",. ..,
U x: ~ ~,
,.. ..
~ 21 z=
e" ..
'" .., ..
.... .... .... "' .... ~ ,.
"" ... ... "" "'" "" .... ..
..
..
..
"'" ... "'" "'" ... "'" "
~ ..
=> => => => => => ..
..
U1 ~ ~ U1 U1 ~ E U1 U1 ~ ~ '" ~ "
~ ., ., ~ ~ "" ..
>- >- ..
"
..
..
..
U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 ..
U1 U1 ..
~ ., .., .., ~ .., '" .., '" .., ., ., ~ "
>- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- ..
..
g' en H
c: ..
0 '" ". 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ..
~ ~ Q. 0 0 0. ~ ..
"" "" "" U1 "" "" U1 "" "" ..
"
.= .= "
"
<:> <:> <:> ..
.., <:> ..
.., <:> = 0 0 .., <X ..
= ;::; OIl = .~- = ~ 0 <X ..
':" ~ .~- ..
.... "" ~ "" "" ..
= 0 ':" ... "
~ .
= = =
<:> .... 0 0 = 0 = .. ~
u, <>: on = = ~ = "
~ "
.... .... <~ '" '" .., .. .....
.... .... .... .... .... ..... ..., .. ~
..
.,
~I
e' >.
.., "'
""'i:
'"
., -
~ u
'" >.
~ u
'" .,
c.""
cu '_A
", ~
'"
'-"
",.
'"
.0
.~
,,.
z=
'--'
;;
c
=>
U1
c:
'"
u
..
..
..... = = CO CO ..... ..... = ..... " =
~ "
..... CO ..... .... = ..... ..... ~ ": ....
.,,; M ~ ~ .. ~
.... "'" .... CO ;;; '" ..
.... .... .... .... - .... .... .... .... ....
.. ...
..
..
..
~ :5 ..... = 0 0 0 ~ 0 CO ..... <:> .. 0-
.... - <:> CO CO "'! ~ ..... = .....
~ ~ .,,; ...; 00 0- 0- ~ ;;; ~ .. 0-
.... .... - .... ....
.. ...
0 0 ..... 0 = on on 0 .. .,
~ ~ 0 .. ~
~ = .... .., = .... CO .... ~ .. :;
...; .. ...;
~ '" 00 ~ .., ~ ~ '" '" ~ .. "'
" ;;; .<=
..
0 " = .,
.. e"
~ .. ~ "'
.. -e
.. .....
.. '"
.. ... ",.
.. c: -'"
'" 0- .. ,. g
;:. .. C
.... .. ~
..... .. ~
.. ';U c:
..
.. :5 '"
.. '0
.... .... .., on 0 .. '"
00 ~ ~ 00 :::1 .. .,
00 - .. OIl ~
.. .. C ~.
~ ~ ~ .. ~
..
.. U
.. '"
- 0- 0- - .... '" on 00.0 .... ..... .. .s
~ .. .~
..... .... ..... .., .... 0- CO .., 00 = 0 ..
..... "" ~. '" .., - ..., ..... '" 0- -. '" .., .. ., .,
" ~
..., '" ..... .., .... ..... ;;; "" 0- .. .. U1
.... .. on '" .., .... '" .. '"
.. .0
->< ->< ~ ;;-
~ '" .. ~
~ ~ "' ,. ..
~ ->< 0 '0 .. .l'l
c: '0 ~ ., C ~ .., 0 ..
e" :>0 ~ 0. .s '-" .- 0 c: U1
~ .e 0 ~ z .. ., .,
c: '" ->< 0 g '" ., ., '" " '" ,..
._ c: 0 ->< .. c: C. '" ., 'Vi
>. ~ .- C U ,.. 0 '" c: .., ., ,.. .. >-
~ a'~ ~ ., ;;: ~ ., "" "' ~ ~ '" ~ .
'-' "'" '" <::> "" x: '-" '-" <::> ..
..... .., on ..... 0- .... = .... '" 0- .. U1 ....
; .., ::;; = -<> OJ .., 0 = '" ..... ... .. ., '"
~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ..., ..... .... = .. '" ..... ~ ;:::;
~ ~ ..... ~ ~ .... '" ~ - '"
. . . . .. u :=
..... ..... '" ..... CO '" ;;; .,.. 0 ..... ..... .. ~
~ ..... .... ~ ..... on ..... '" .... ..... .... -'
... .,.. .... .., .... .., .,.. .. - .. .... ..
~ ~ .. rg
c: .. ~ .
'" '0 ~ >. '" ..
'" .., C 0 ";;j 0; '" ..... .. ;:= -'
:; ~ .., U1 '" ~ "' .. ~ =>
'" c: ~ '" c: ~ 0. '" en- .. := <X
'" U1 '" ~ ., 0 ~ 0 IE 0. c: '" .. '"
.'; ::l z= '" ~ ",. '" <::> '" '" c. "' .. '" ....
Q'.....) :: ;:: z= u ~ '"" ::; -' :>0 .. .... >-
~ x: ., .. '-" '" UJ
'" '" ~ 0 >. ., .>< >.- .. <X <X
~ ., '-' '-' ~G' ->< c: '" .., ~ .. ~ "" '"
c: c: ~ "' "' c: .~ .. .... ""
.~ ~ ~ ,.; ;: '" ....; '" ~ "' "' .. :> 0.. <X
r- '"" <::> u.. <.D "" '" .. <X 0::> <.D
:g
"'
U
....
c:
'"
u
~
021
'c ~
r~ ....
~
c.
::l
""
OIl
'0
'"
c:
~
.
... C
o
::l
O.~
o
0.
;:;.
'-'
~
o
tf.
~
u
:J
c:
o
'-'
}l
.. ~
.... '"
'-" c: ....
<X => ...
~ U1 0
:> c: ~
.~~ ~ '"
"" ~
~ 0
<X U1 '"
"" c: 0-
'" "'
U ...
~ <::> ....
~, =
<::> ~
~ c:
-<= "" ~ '"
C
:t: ;;;.
U1 '"
.~
~
.,
U1
::l
~
~
~"'~
~g-&
c:..x~
~ .~- g
0.
::l
~~
U1 .,
~ '"
Q) C._
_ ::l .0
U . '"
:>0->< -
U -.-
'" '" "'
~ "" ,.
. ...
c: U1
g.E E
~~~
'" ~
(".1--:::(1')
:. ~ ~
c: c: c:
:= ::::'~.3
C....:M:: OJ
.. '" c:
'" 0 c:
B~:E
L
'"
..
"
...
L
o
."
C
o
U
u
,..
U &!
~~
-- ."
.Cl >.
L ....
"'
en c
L '"
CU ... O.
::J~=~
~ -;; 1;; ~ ,.
> >-- CD "
~ en VI :; ::
to c: c: CO .t
01 Q.) OJ ..c:. '"
CII. Q. II
...0 (::) c::J.....,
<::> . Or:-..,
OCt c-. u.. . C),.....,
_'_2':: Q _ I It
..."'-.c:..,.O
-Q) VI_____U'1"
V1>-CDtI')U1_lt
~ ::0- CU GJ _ t,
.=:;' ~. >- >- >- ::
~ ~ >. >.. >. >... >. >.. ,.
CD Q) ..- _ ..- _ _ ...... II
eu Q) .:a.c: ..:II:: ..::.c oK .:.e ..::.c ..
3~GJClJG.1Q)lUQ)"
I I Cl)Q)(U(UCDQ;"
._ :. 2 =- ::It =- ::0.: ,.
a::I a:) ::
<> .n
ci ~ - _ .-: ,...') ::
'--- lS ("'..I c.J..... U U II
c.!:' --. It: C,D c: c: .,
o ...... ._...... .1
..,
.. ..
t:n c: "
E::: ::
~ 5J- ~ "
VI ('0 "
f'Cl Jl:: "
S U ::
..
..
..
..... ..
""
..
..
..
..
..
EV1~~~E~En
..
oo
oo
oo
oo
." .... ."
::.~::~~~~~::
..
..
..
.... ..
~:!.~~~~~~::
..
..
oo
oo
oo
gg~"
r- .- ..". "
("'-.l C'I (".I '"
oo
u
,..
U
~
'"
""
..,
~
'-"
c
o u
.~ ~
~
~ .
~
""
=>
~~~~::~
'"O~ ''00 .('.,1_
::)='-:=J'_~
..--00...... I ,
(.]I 0 I <:) <:::t
C L <>
.~ <>
c:;'U
c c
<::I -..0.." <;)
.." r- ""'" .....
o ClO r--
('.1- - ~
<>
""
~
L
0 ~
;: ..,
~ ""
....
..,
g
'"
~
, C
'"
" 0
O. ....
J.:
;:;.
U
~
~
.--
'"
<> ~
""
:e -
'" ...... ~
...... ""
...., '" .....
.-- <>
"" .--
~ ""
'" g
..... cO
':!;
g~
.--~
L
...
'"
gg ~'
~ Ln ~ 1~
..
..
..
oo
..
..
oo
..
..
..
..
..
..
oo
..
..
..
..
..
..
oo
..
~ ..
o..~~ ~ L..~'-oll
.... _ 0 CO II: "' .c .-. ..
OJ 0.. ...... -0 ,_ '- ~ CD II
CO "ft) ~ ~ Ci.o.. .:i. ;.:: It
n:! ..- (I) ...... .. It: ..c
~Q..U.a"'QJ '011
~ "' >c Q s:: -0 ..,.a ......
X E I..oJ 0::: (..) Lt.I en ex: ::
~~::~g~o;o--"
ClO U""I ~ ~ - C"-I CO r- tt
~?77~'=;"'~'r'
0'" ""'# .-. _ r- 0-
r- r- r- M <""" ....., CO -.a t,
-..............,.,..O"r-oo
.~ ::
c:c:c: "
c: c: :2 0 "'
",0"'" (3 tn...... II:::
. t-!J ..... .. ..0 Q) "
CDUClOn::I'-~"
~ X GJ e::::l => ~'. :;::
.- ~ :; .~:~ -'"
..... ._ <X CO > "U .,
n::! '- C'I '- n::I =:t "
UIXI,...., U 0,., ,.
C"-I--o--co..,o-_
r-COr-~r-c:>r-O"
-.. ,.~ V'l 0 I'-"'] 1" ,..... c:>
-~
:!:~~
~"S
~
j;
- ~
g:~
~:::
;:!......
_ 0-
~
~
o
'-'
c _
o '"
." ..,
,~ ~ ~
~..CI~
~~~
- ~
""
~ '"
.... ...
- ~
..
0:
;;; ;;;
....
C
..
~ ;::: '-'
'" ..... L
;;; ;;; '"
,.
"" ~ 0
<> C
~ ..... "'
... ;;; ~
<>
"" ...... ~
<> .., <'"
'" <::> ...
;;;
...
...
~
g'
U
>.
:;l
L
,
C
g
C
'"
U
0
~ !l
~, ~
.....,
"" C
.... ..
U
~ ~
'"
.., L
...
go U
>.
U
<.J E
,.,
u
>- ~ g
'" <X ""
~ "" 5 -' ;2
<"
<C dO "'-
:::i = x '"
dO <'"
:- = .. "" .~
dO ~ '-'
:5
];.
c
'"'
,g
....
."
...
....
o
<.J
...
0'
~
Q)
~
'"
~
g'
u
,...
~
'0
c
..
Q)
O'
'"
~
..,
o.
-5
o
..,
~
u
'"
'0
u
.s
L
'"
:;
~
Q)
c
5
.;
...
u
~
o
u
::l
...
u
~