The URL can be used to link to this page

101292 CC Reg AgP CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. FOLLOWING THE REGULAR PORTION OF THE MEETING THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONVENE IN A WORK SESSION FORMAT TO CONSIDER THE 1993 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - No votes to be taken at the Work Session. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Roll Call stover Daugherty Lewis Mayor Brancel Gagne B. Review Agenda 2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES , . J \ I:: . A. Regular city Council Meeting - September 28, 1992 (Att.No.2A-Minutes) 3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Items on Consent Agenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution PrOClaiming the Month of November, 1992 to be Epilepsy Month in the City of Shorewood (Att.No.3A-Resolution) r B. A Motion to Consider a Resolution Extending the Deadline for Recording a Simple Subdivision for Thomas Doherty (Att.No.3B-Applicant's Request Letter and proposed Resolution) C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Space and Setback Variances r~ John Dolan 26305 Edgewood Road (Att.No.3C-proposed Resolution) D. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Shady Hills Storm Sewer Improvement (Att.No.3D-proposed Resolution) Applicant: Location: 4 . PARK A. Report on Park Commission meeting of September 29, 1992 B. A Motion to Approve Design Agreement with OSM Regarding a Boundary Surv~y for Freeman Park (Att.No.4B-Design Agreement) C. A Motion to Authorize Letter of Agreement with Mark Koegler to Prepare and Submit a Grant Application (Att.NO.4C-Park Planner's Letter) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1992 PAGE TWO 5. PLANNING 6. 7:30 P.M. - METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION (Attachment) . 7. CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR TWO STOP SIGNS - SHOREWOOD OAKS DRIVE AT MAPLE LEAF COURT (Att.No.7-Administrator's Memo, back- ground info) 8. CONSIDER A REOUEST TO REDUCE SPEED ON COVINGTON ROAD BETWEEN VINE HILL AND SWEETWATER CURVE (Att.No.8-Residents Request) 9. CONSIDER A REOUEST FOR STREET LIGHTS ON COVINGTON ROAD BETWEEN VINE HILL ROAD AND SWEETWATER CURVE/VINE RIDGE ROAD (Att.No.9-Residents Request) 10. A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE S.E. AREA WATER TREATMENT PLANT - A&K CONSTRUCTION (Att.No.10-Resolution) 11. CONSIDER A REOUEST TO INCREASE BUDGET - S. E. AREA WATER TREATMENT PLANT - ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS - Noel Voaen (Att.No.11-Request Letter) 12. A MOTION TO AMEND CHAPTER 903 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATIVE TO DELINOUENCIES (Att.No.12-proposed Ordinance) 13. CONSIDER A MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE REOUEST- VINE HILL MARKET la.k.a. SkiQPerettel Applicant: Location: James V. Pyle, Owner (vine Hill Market) 19215 Highway 7 (Att.No.13-Planner's Memo and Applicants Letter) 14. CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE REGARDING CITY WATER HOOK-UP Applicant: Location: Tony Studer 5685 Minnetonka Drive (Att.No.14-Resident's Letter) 15. APPROVE LOW OUOTE FOR LANDSCAPING FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY WORKS (Att.No.15-planner's Memo and Bid) 16. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 17. STAFF REPORTS A. Attorney's Report CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1992 , PAGE THREE 17. STAFF REPORTS - CONTINUED B. Engineer's Report 1992 Project Update , Church Road Assessment Policy (Att.No.17B-Engineer's Memo) C. Planner's Report D. Administrator's Report Residential Recycling Funding Policy Revision Effective January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1997 (Att.NO.17D-Hennepin County M~mo) Report on Speed Complaints Road/Covington Road (Att.No.17D-Memorandum) Old Market Schedule for the old Public Works Building Removal (Att.No.17D-Schedule) 18. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Mayor Brancel B. Councilmembers 19. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Attachment Claims) WORK SESSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDER THE 1993 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Attachment) 2. ADJOURN WORK SESSION JCH.al 10/08/92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA ~~ MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1992 6:45 PM - THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WILL ASSEMBLE IN THE CHAMBERS FOR A GROUP PHOTOGRAPH. ~ << 1 f ! There is a lot on this agenda so therefore it seems unlikely that we will be able to have a Budget Work Session. We will attempt to keep the agenda for the October 26th meeting to a minimum so as much time as possible can be given to a Budget Work Session. AGENDA ITEM 3A - This resolution proclaims the month of November 1992 as Epilepsy Month in the City of Shorewood. AGENDA ITEM 3B - Because NSP failed to deliver the agreed upon stipulation for easement delays have resulted in this request to extend the deadline to receive the deed regarding the Doherty property at 20375 Manor Road. This resolution extends the deadline to October 22, 1992~ ~ 1 i AGENDA ITEM 3C - This resolution approves a CUP for accessory space and setback variances at 26305 Edgewood Road. The Council directed this resolution be prepared at the September 14th meeting. AGENDA ITEM 3 D - This resolution accepts the Shady Hills storm Sewer Improvement project. .. t t J jJ. ~ 't '. AGENDA ITEM 4B - $5,000 has been budgeted for the surveying of Freeman Park. The Park Commission has worked with staff and Mark Koegler, Park Planner, in determining the most cost effective way of accomplishing this task. This design agreement with OSM is our recommendation. AGENDA ITEM 4C - The Park Commission has recommended the Council approve this letter of agreement with Mark Koegler for up to $500 for preparation of a bike trail grant application. One of the areas which could be included in this application is a pedestrian way along Old Market Road and covington Road. Included in the packet is a memorandum from the city Attorney indicating that Old Market Road can continue as a bike way even if the side walk is in place. This means that 25 mph designation could remain. AGENDA ITEM 6 - At this point we have heard unofficially that representatives from MWCC will be at the Council meeting at 7:30 pm. Staff is preparing a short presentation to give to them and the City Council which puts in perspective what has been happening over the last several years. At that point we might ask the MWCC representatives to respond to our letter and this presentation. AGENDA ITEM 7 - This is a request for the City Council to reconsider a Shorewood Oaks Drive area request for two additional stop signs at Maple Leaf Court. A complete history of this request is enclosed in the packet. AGENDA ITEM 8 - This is a petition from residents on covington Road requesting measures to reduce speed. Staff memorandums raising policy questions are enclosed in the packet. AGENDA ITEM 9 - The same petitioners are requesting additional street lights on Covington Road. Two additional street lights would be warranted. Should the Council wish to authorize it staff will designate the best locations and coordinate the installation. AGENDA ITEM 10 - This item remains from the last City Council agenda. We hope to have a final report on water testing from Munitech by the Monday evening council meeting. AGENDA ITEM 11 - This item to increase the fees for engineering services for the S.E. area water treatment plant was held over from the last meeting because Mr. Vogen was unable to attend at that time. . . AGENDA ITEM 12 - This is a redraft of an ordinance presented at the last meeting considering delinquent water bills. The additional language suggested by the City Council, at the last meeting, is underlined as subd.3(d) in this proposed ordinance. AGENDA ITEM 13 - The CUP and variance request for the Vine Hill market was previously tabled and therefore needs to be raised again at this meeting. AGENDA ITEM 14 - This is a request of Tony Studer, 5685 Minnetonka Drive to spread his $4,000 water hook-up fee out over three years. Should the Council wish to do this we would recommend $1,000 down and $1,000 a year over a three year period at an 8% interest spread as a special assessment rather than monthly paYments. AGENDA ITEM 15 - The low quote for landscaping for the Public Works facility was presented by Lan-De-Con Inc. in the amount of $17,715. Even this low quote is about $5,000 above the original budget. We recommend awarding the work to the low quote, Lan-De-Con, with the understanding that they work with the Planning Director Nielsen to lower the total landscaping cost nearer to the original budget of $12,500. AGENDA ITEM 17B - In preparation for the Church Road special assessment hear ing at 7: 15 pm on Monday, October 26, the City Engineer has prepared a memorandum discussing the issues to be considered in relation to that project. The Council should have an opportunity to discuss these issues before the public hearing. . JCH.al 10/9/92 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CAlL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Brancel at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE A ROLL CALL . Present: Mayor Brancel; Councilmembers Daugherty, Gagne, Lewis and Stover; Administrator Hurm, Engineer Dresel, Attorney Keane, Planner Nielsen and Finance Director Rolek. B. REVIEW AGENDA Hurm requested an addition to the Consent Agenda: Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc. - R.O.W. Permit, Brentridge Drive, and the removal of Agenda Item No.9. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve the Agenda for September 28 with the addition to the Consent Agenda and the removal of Item No.9. Motion passed 5/0. . 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A Executive Session Council Meeting - September 14, 1992 Stover moved, Gagne seconded to approve the Executive Session Council meeting minutes of September 14, 1992. Motion passed 5/0. B. Regular City Council Meeting - September 14, 1992 Gagne moved, Lewis seconded to approve the regular City Council meeting minutes of September 14, 1992. Motion passed 5/0. 1 REGUlAR CITY COUNCll. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 2 3. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Brancel read the Consent Agenda for September 28, 1992. Stover moved, Gagne seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and to adopt the Motions and Resolutions therein: A Change Order No.3 - Rochon Corp - Public Works Facility. B. Change Order No.4 - Rochon Corp - Public Works Facility. C. RESOLUTION NO. 89-22, "A Resolution Moving the Reconvene Date for the 1993 Budget Hearing." . D. Street Light - Amesbury Homeowners Association, Bayswater Road. E. Right-of-Way Permit - Shorewood Oaks Development, Inc., Brentridge Drive. Motion passed 5/0. 4. PARK - None. 5. PlANNING . Stover reported that at its September 22 meeting following discussion regarding proposed re-zoning and variances requested by the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that a public hearing be held to consider amending the City Code to change the slip to land ratio and discussed and recommended approval of proposed amendments to the Shoreland Management Regulations. 6. REVIEW AND CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING TIlE DESIGN AND PlANS FOR TIlE IMPROVEMENTS TO LIlAC lANE Dresel reported that he met with Shorewood resident Simcox and has reviewed the final plans and specifications for reconstruction of Lilac Lane with the City of Chanhassen. Items in the design plans incorporating concerns of Shorewood residents include: 1) existing lilac hedge along the north side of Lilac Lane to be saved; 2) barrier consisting of wooden bollards to be constructed off the north side of Lilac Lane in line with Teton Lane; 3) existing slope of Lilac Lane to be matched at an approximate rate of 8.26%; and 4) proposed retaining wall shall be modular concrete block in lieu of timber. Dresel recommends approval of the plans prepared by the City of Chanhassen's engineer. 2 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEYIEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 3 Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to approve RESOLUIlON NO. 90-22, "A Resolution Approving the Design and Plans for the Improvements to lilac Lane." Motion passed 5/0. 7. AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING-SHADY ISIAND FROM R-1B TO R-1C Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve Ordinance No. 258, "Amending Section 1201.09 of the Sborewood City Code" to re-zone Shady Island from R-lB to R-1C. Motion passed 5/0. . 8. A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUIlON APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE S.B. AREA WATER TREATMENT PIANT - A & K CONSTRUcnON Lewis moved, Gagne seconded to approve a Resolution Accepting Project No. 91458, Water Treatment Plant for the Southeast Area, Well No.7. Daugherty questioned the validity of test results, expressed concern as to whether the problem has been solved and suggested that final payment be withheld until further testing is conducted. Lewis indicated he has not heard anything from his neighbors. Dresel stated that testing has been done randomly two or three times trying to work out operational problems. Lewis withdrew the motion for approval to accept the project, Gagne withdrew his second . Stover moved, Daugherty seconded to table action to adopt a Resolution approving final payment for the S.E. Area Water Treatment Plant - A & K Construction pending results of additional water testing by an independent laboratory and receipt of comments, if any, from residents in the southeast area. Motion passed 5/0. 9. REMOVED. 10. CONSIDER A MEMORANDUM OFUNDERST ANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD AND FIRMS ENTERING CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY Hurm stated that having had professional consulting firms approach the City for additional funds "after the fact", he has prepared a "Memorandum of Understanding" to be signed by a consultant when entering into an agreement with the City. He pointed out that the agreement provides that if the scope of services requested significantly expands, a consultant 3 . . REGUlAR CITY COUNCll.. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 4 must make a request in writing to the City before the additional work is begun. This would allow for prior Council consideration and approval of additional compensation for the service. Lewis moved, Gagne seconded to approve the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Oty of Shorewood and Firms Entering Consulting Agreements with the Oty. Motion passed 5/0. 11. A MOTION TO ADOPT VOUCHER PAYMENT POLICY FOR CITY CONTRACTING PROJECTS Hurm reviewed the suggestion presented at the September 14 meeting to streamline the approval process for construction contract pay vouchers by eliminating the time and expense involved in preparing vouchers for Council approval. He stated that the new policy would provide that construction project payments be approved through the regular voucher payment process by the Project Manager, Finance Director, and Administrator. The new policy includes the following: 1) Council must have taken action to award the project and its proposed budget; 2) only intermediate monthly pay requests within the established budget will be exempt from Council review; 3) change orders or supplementary agreements require Council approval; 4) final pay request subject to Council approval; and 5) pay vouchers processed and approved by Project Manager, Finance Director and Administrator and listed on Council's check approval list before payment. Gagne stated that the current policy should be retained to keep Council members informed. They are accountable for taxpayers' money. Stover stated that at the present time, Council consideration and action on such items does not take much time, questioned whether the change results in saving money or time and felt the existing procedure allows Council members to keep up with current projects. Lewis noted that projects and budgets are pre- approved, Council approval is a formality and updates of construction projects are provided to the Council. Lewis moved, Brancel seconded to adopt the new Voucher Payment Policy for Oty Contracting Projects. Motion passed 3/2. Stover and Gagne voted nay. 12. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE - CHAPTER 901.01 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATIVE TO STREET EXCAVATION Hurm stated that this ordinance requires a permit for excavating within 10 feet of a public street right-of-way and increases the excavator's deposit from $1,000 to $2,000 which provides for restoration of the street. Based on past experience with both matters, staff recommends approval of these amendments to the Code. 4 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPfEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 5 Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve Ordinance No. 259 Amending Chapter 901 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to the Excavation of Streets and Public Right-of-Way. Motion passed 5/0. 13. A MOTION TO AMEND CHAPTER 903 OF TIlE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE REIATIVE TO DELINOUENCIES Rolek reviewed the recommended amendment regarding the water turn off policy previously discussed by the Council. It shortens the amount of time for sending shu-off notices for delinquent charges from 90 to 45 days and removes language allowing for special arrangements. He noted that the current policy allows for a two-quarter delinquency whereas the proposed policy will keep a delinquency in the current quarter, increase . efficiency and improve the City's cash flow. Stover asked whether the new policy would include both commercial and residential. Rolek stated this will cover all property. Stover questioned the dollar amount of quarterly delinquencies, expressed concern about the severity of turning off residents' water and asked for information about the appeal process. Lewis stated assistance programs are available for persons with problems paying utility bills and that it may be necessary to implement a new policy in order to encourage timely payments of obligations to the City for this service. Rolek noted that delinquent water bills disputed can be appealed to the Council and water service would continue pending a determination, and that unpaid utility costs are assessed to residents through the tax system. . The Council members directed the staff to modify the proposed amendment for the Council's review at its next meeting to provide for an appeal process for an individual with a delinquent water bill before the water is turned off. 14. A MOTION APPROVING DESIGN AGREEMENT FOR TIlE PREPARATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS FOR LAKE LINDEN DRIVE Hurm stated that MNDot has completed its speed limit study on Lake Linden Drive leaving the speed limit at 30 mph. MnDOT recommends posting an S-curve warning sign on Lake Linden Drive, with a 25 mile per hour speed recommendation. In addition, the City's engineering firm has developed a preliminary design agreement for reconstruction of Lake Linden Drive. Stover asked whether there will be neighorhood involvement or a public hearing in connection with the proposed re-construction and how the project will be financed. Dresel indicated that the road will be designed with a 30 mile an hour speed limit and informal 5 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEP1EMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 6 meetings and contact with the residents during the design stage is appropriate. It was noted that a preliminary re-constructionengineering design will be developed consistent with MSA requiremenrs in order to assure MSA funding. Dresel indicated that some additional right-of-way will be required to meet the road width requirements. Gagne questioned whether there is an option for the City to finance the project and avoid designing the road to meet the criteria for MSA funding. Stover asked whether additional right-of-way acquisition is necessary. Lewis stated that the Council should retain options in the design of the road based on input from the residents on the stated-mandated requirements. Daugherty suggested that action on the right-of-way acquisition be delayed until further information on the proposed design is available. Brancel noted that she has received a number of communications from residents on Lake linden Drive requesting that improvements be made to address the safety concerns. . Staff indicated that additional information will be available after the design plans are drawn up for review by the Council. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve the Preliminary Arlmini~trative Expenditure Budget and Design Agreement with Orr Schelen Mayeron and Associates, Inc. for Lake linden Drive Reconstruction (MSA Project) to include: A topographic survey, B. proposed aligninent for the new road and C. proposed grading plan for the new alignment; and that informal contacts be made with the affected residents. Motion passed 5/0. Lewis moved, Stover seconded to direct the staff to erect an S curve and 20 mile-an-hour warning sign at the appropriate position on Lake linden Drive as soon as possible. . Motion passed 5/0. 15. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING STOP SIGN PLACEMENT CRITERIA Hurm noted that the staff had been asked to review the City's stop sign placement policy. He indicated that the Resolution being considered contains applicable language from the MNDot's uniform manual. Lewis moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 91-92, "A Resolution Adopting Stop Sign Placement Criteria, amended by adding the following: A RESOLVE paragraph along the lines of: "the City Council has the responsibility of making the final determination in the placement of all stop signs within the City of Shorewood." Motion passed 5/0. 6 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 7 16. A MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBliC HEARING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF COST OF CHURCH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 91-2 Daugherty moved, Gagne seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 92-92, "A Resolution Setting a Public Hearing on Proposed Assessments for Project No. 91-2, Street and Water Main Improvements, Church Road." Motion passed 5/0. 17. CONSIDERATION OF lAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATION COMMISSION (LMCC) BUDGET - 1992 . Mr. Jim Daniels, Administrator of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission, presented the 1993 Proposed Budget for Administration and Local Cable Programming which totals $142,450. He also presented an update on Congressional legislation regarding cable matters. He noted that, to date, 10 of 12 city councils have approved the budget. The budget for 1993 is generally comparable to the 1992 budget except for funding for cable casting City Council meetings is now included in their budget. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve the 1993 Proposed Budget for Administration and Local Cable Programming, as presented by the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. Motion passed 5/0. . Brancel noted that the Cable Commission office has been re-Iocated to the U.S. West building in Excelsior. Constituents may call the cable office at 474-5539. 18. MATTERS FROM TIlE FLOOR Mr. Bob Rascop, LMCD director, 4560 Enchanted Point, briefly commented on the cable commission's budget and on the reconstruction plans for Lake Linden Drive. He asked if OSM had done some design work on Lake Linden Drive previously. 19. STAFF REPORTS A Attorney's Report - None. B. Engineer's Report - 1992 Project Update Dresel commented on the closure of Radisson Road Entrance, the completion of the Public Works facility and the status of Church Road. 7 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 8 C. Planner's Report Report on Delinquent Clean-Up Charges - Greg Fox Nielsen brought the Council's attention to his September 24 memorandum providing background information regarding the assessment of clean-up charges for property located at 25565 Smith town Road including a chronology of the complaint and how it was processed as requested by the Council at its September 14 meeting. The Council members agreed procedures were complied with by staff and re-affirmed assessment of the appropriate charges. Nielsen provided information resulting from his meeting with the developer of Gideon Woods noting that a public hearing on the P.U.D. will be scheduled in November. . D. Administrator's Report Drop-off Box Hurm informed the Council that the cost of providing an after-hours drop off box as requested by the Council will be $90 for materials and $160 for labor. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve payment of the costs associated with installation of an after-hours drop off box at City Hall. Motion passed 5/0. Schedule of Meeting Dates for the Remainder of 1992 . Hurm reviewed the tentative schedule of meeting dates for the remainder of 1992. Stover moved, Gagne seconded to re-schedule the November 23 Council meeting to Monday, November 30, and to cancel the December 28 Council meeting. Motion passed 5/0. The remaining 1992 Council meeting dates are: Mondays: October 14 and October 28; November 9 and November 30; December 14. A Budget Work Session is scheduled for November 16 if needed. Fall Yardwaste Collection Hurm informed the Council that the Fall Yardwaste Collection date is Saturday, October 24, 1992, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in the City Hall parking lot. 8 REGUlAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 9 Portable Phone for Sewer Safety Hurm informed the Council that upon the request of the Public Works Director, it is recommended that the City purchase a portable phone at a cost of $350 to assure safety for workers and for emergency purposes. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve the expenditure of $350 for purchase of a portable phone as requested by the Public Works Director. Motion passed 5/0. Metropolitan Waste Control Commissi9n . Hurm reported that a meeting with the other affected cities regarding the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's increased sewer service charges was held on September 25. Dresel reviewed the discussions at the meeting noting that, in general, each City has a unique situation regarding sewer service and the calculation of charges. Council members discussed the subject and agreed that the Chair of the Commission be invited to the Council's next meeting on October 12 to answer questions and provide information on the rationale for the increase in Shorewood's sewer service charges and further, the Council agreed to pursue appropriate legal action against the Commission regarding the increase for sewer service charges if necessary. Hurm informed the Council that photographs will be taken at 6:45 p.m., prior to the October 12 meeting. 20. COUNCIL REPORTS . A. Mayor Brancel - None. B. Councilmembers Lewis suggested that if not already done, a follow-up traffic study be conducted since the opening of the Old Market Road intersection and asked about the status of MNDot's agreement to complete the Radisson Road cul-de-sac. Daugherty expressed concern about the traffic speed level on Old Market Road and suggested that authorities may want to heighten surveillance in selected areas of Old Market Road. 21. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to adjourn the City Council Meeting at 9:30 p.m. subject to the approval of claims and re-scheduled the Work Session to the Council's next meeting. Motion passed 5/0. 9 . . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEYfEMBER 28, 1992 - PAGE 10 RESPECIFULLY SUBMfl'IED, Arlene H. Bergfalk Recording Secretary Northern Counties Secretarial Services ATfEST: JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISlRATOR BARBARA J. BRANCEL, MAYOR 10 . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1992 TO BE EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD WHEREAS, there are more than 100,000 Minnesotans with some form of epilepsy; and, WHEREAS, epilepsy is the second most common neurological disfunction or physical impairment, not a disease but a disorder of the nervous system; and, WHEREAS, sixty percent of those persons who have epilepsy are elementary school children or younger which is approximately one child in every second classroom; and WHEREAS, early diagnosis and attention to the social and neurological aspects of epilepsy will afford people better control; and, WHEREAS, there continues to be a need for improved education and more information regarding public attitudes toward understanding and accepting those persons with epilepsy. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the city council of the City of Shorewood do hereby proclaim the month of November, 1992 as EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA and encourage the citizens of our City to increase their awareness of the needs of those who have epilepsy. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this 12th day of October, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator 3A Honorable Mayor and Members of this Local Government, . I am writing to ask you a very special favor. This favor would be to put together a proclamation and some time during the month of November to proclaim November as Epilepsy Month through out your city during the year /f?2 By doing this you would not only be helping myself and the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota but also each and every individual through out your city who has this neurological disorder. I also would like to add that I am a member of the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota and a volunteer and have been since 1977. I also am a member of the Epilepsy Foundation of America an have been since 1977. Your cooperation and assistance would be deeply. appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, . Doug Hill 1037 43rd Ave. N.E. Columbia Heights, Mn. 55421 . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR RECORDING A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION FOR THOMAS DOHERTY WHEREAS, Shorewood City Council Resolution No. 46-92, dated 11 May 1992, approved a partial vacation of the Gardendale Road right-of-way contingent upon Thomas Doherty providing a warranty deed for property which will serve to replace said right-of-way by 30 June 1992; and WHEREAS, Thomas Doherty has requested additional time to clear the title of the aforementioned property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota that the change in alignment of the Gardendale Road right-of-way is in the best interests of the City and the affected property owners. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the deadline for Doherty to provide the aforementioned deed is hereby extended to 22 October 1992. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this 12th day of October, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk 3B SE~-30-92 WED 16:26 LAW OFFICE . . P.02 JOSl:I'H D. ZWAK A'CTORNE:Y AT LAW 5101 TH1MSEN A\'E,'/I...E. SUIrE ~OO \'<llNNf,TONKA, ~llsNr,.~nr^ ~~.\.l~ ^KEA (,'oln: td~ ~ rUI:I'IIIINf .1., .\.11'" ~~ September 29. 1992 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Brad Nielsen City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood. Minnesota 55331 Re: Doherty Property Exchange 20375 Manor Road Dear Brad: ' Since I have not had any luck reaching you by phone, I am requesting that you request that the City Council grant us an .:z~ extension to finalize the above referenced matter until October~. All parties having an interest in this matter have been served with notice and no answers have been filed objecting to the registration of the title. We were scheduled to have the final hearing on Tuesday. September 29. All papers had to be filed with the C 0 u r t by 1 a s t T 11 U r s day, but N S P f ai 1 e d t 0 del i v e r the il 9 r e e d upon Stipulation for Easement. This was due merely to their people getting the document prepared and executed. I am rescheduling the hearing to Tuesday, October 13. After that hearing the matter will be final and we will deliver the deed to the City. Would you please inform me if the city will acccmodate us on this matter. I will need a formal resolution to file with the Examiner. ~~ln c ere I}.'!' . . --, /'~ '7 ' -0. /1' . ') ~.., I. .~. ~-rJ:-t,\ }'(~v( (/ }J 0 S e p h o. Z w a''K, ",Attorney at Uaw RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY SPACE AND SETBACK VARIANCES ~ TO JOHN DOLAN WHEREAS, JOHN DOLAN (Applicant) is the owner of real property located at 26305 Edgewood Road, in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, legally described as: Lot 4, Block 1, Oak Ridge Estates and . WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an attached garage, the area of which, is 1981 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of accessory space exceeding 1200 square feet; and WHEREAS, The Applicant has applied for a setback variance to allow the house to be located 24.5 feet from the rear lot line of the site, which variance amounts to 25.5 feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 25 August 1992, which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and . WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 1 September 1992, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's request was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 14 September 1992, at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the total proposed accessory space (1981 square feet) does not exceed the floor area above grade of the principal structure (2383 square feet). .3C 2. That the total area of accessory space does not exceed 10% of the minimum lot area for the R-1A Zoning District in which it is located (4,000 square feet). 3. That design and materials of the garage are consistent with the architectural character of the proposed home. 4. That the Applicant has provided soil tests showing that the site has been filled and locating the house 50 feet from the rear lot line would result in substantial site alteration. 5. That the adjacent house to the west is located 37.5 feet from the street right- of-way, and that the City Code provides for an average setback to be established in such cases. 6. That the City Engineer has reviewed existing drainage problems in the area and recommends that the lowest level of the house be kept as high as possible. . 7. That locating the house 43.75 feet from the Edgewood Road right-of-way and 35 feet from the rear lot line minimizes the variance necessary for the applicant to make' reasonable use of his property. CONCLUSION 1. That the application of John Dolan for a Conditional Use Permit as set forth hereinabove be and hereby is granted. . 2. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicant a 15-foot rear yard setback variance and a 6.25 side yard abutting a street variance for the purpose of constructing the home. 3. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this Resolution for f1ling with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of October, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATIEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator/Clerk RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SHADY HILLS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO.91-1 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has entered into a contract with Widmer Incorporated for the improvements of the Shady Hills Storm Sewer; and WHEREAS, the Contractor has petitioned for final acceptance of the project based on work performed to date; and ~ WHEREAS, a final inspection has been made by the City Engineer pursuant to paragraph 43 of the General Conditions of said contract. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that: The City does hereby accept the work completed pursuant to said contract and the one year guarantee provided for in paragraph 57 of the General Condi tions shall commence as of the date of this resolution, subject to the following items: 1. The Contractor must make satisfactory showing that he has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statues 290.92 requiring withholding State income tax; and ~ Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, of the City of Shorewood this 12th day of October, 1992. 2. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator 3D . . DESIGN AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into be,!Ween the City of Shorewood and Orr-Schelen- Mayeron & Associates, Inc. (OSM), pursuant to the terms and conditions stated below. Project No: 92-2 Project Description: Freeman Park Boundary and Topographic Survey. Scope of Services: As described below: A Topographic survey. (1" = 100' with 2 foot contours) B. Composite boundary based on legal descriptions from City Records. C. Composite Topography jBoundary sheet rectified to the same coordinate system. D. Field boundary'staking as requested by the City Park Planner. Schedule: Composite sheet by January 1, 1993. Field staking as requested. Compensation: Hourly basis with a maximum of $5,000 for the items above. OSM to guarantee completion of items A, B, and C, with remainder of $5000 fee applied to field staking (item D) at its regular hourly rate (minimum of three corners). Deliverables: Composite Boundary jTopographySheet at a scale of 1" = 100 feet with 2 foot contours. Title Opinion of the boundary documents from the City Attorney's office are specifically excluded from this contract. Signed: O-dJUt D. Edward Ames, L.S. \ Vice President 45 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. mID liD ~':7') ~ - ~ 0 ~(*':--') \j September 29, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Jim: . As a follow-up to our telephone conversation yesterday, I have examined the Interim Solicitation Process for Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) Funding of Bikeway and Walkway Projects. It appears that a number of the trail segments shown on the Shorewood Trail Plan are eligible for the program. Shorewood trails also seem to reasonably fit the qualifying criteria used in making the funding awards. Based on the application submittal requirements, I would estimate that the total fee for the preparation of the grant application will range from $400.00 to $500.00. In any case, I do not see the fee exceeding $500.00. Some of the text prepared for the STP program would be usable in other bikeway/walkway grant applications such as the State's Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. . We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal for continued park planning services for the City of Shorewood. Please advise me as to how you wish to proceed on this matter. Sincerely, ~~~ - R. Mark Koegler, RLA Vice President RMK:dbm 4c.. Land Use / Environmental · Planning / Design 7300MetroBoulevard/Suite525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 · (612)835-9960 · Fax:(612)835-3160 e,;:c '._-i._ -r .-, .::: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 612 291-6359 FAX 612 291-6550 TrY 612 291-0904 TRANSPORTATION: ADVISORY BOARD September 10, 1992' Commissioner, Department of Transportation Chair, Regional Transit Board Chair, Metropolitan Transit Commission County Board Chairs County/City Park Commission Chairs Mayors and Town Board Chairs . Re: Interim Solicitation Process for Federal Surface Transportation Program Funding of Bikeway and Walkway Projects 1992 Dear Public Official: The purpose of this letter is to request the submittal of bikeway and walkway projects to be funded by the Surface Transportation Program (STP). The deadline for submittals is November 2, 1992. The Twin C!ties region has been allocated STP funds by the Federal Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). To date, some of these funds have been allocated to highway and transit projects by the region. An interim process is being put in place at this time to solicit bikeway and walkway projects. A total of $1,500,000 is available. A permanent process for allocation of STP and other federal funds will be developed later this year. As you may know, "Enhancements" is another category of federal funding that can be used for bikeways and walkways. Those funds are not included in this process. If the Metropolitan Counci1!TAB is assigned responsibility to allocate those funds, a process will be dev.eloped later in the year. . While the interim procedures described in the attachment seem applicable for bicycle and walking facilities, they may need to be adjusted to better serve the region in the future. The TACITAB will utilize the applications submitted as input for the development of the permanent process for allocating federal funds. TQe accompanying material describes two categories of projects -- traditional and innovative. There are separate criteria for each category. All submittals must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Monday, November 2,1992 to be considered. Final approval of selected projects is anticipated in December. Please address your submittals to Mr. Emil Brandt, Transportation Coordinator, Transportation Advisory Board, Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. Sincerely, (I ," C---- ~~iL) /~ U'L/l( Sally Evert " Chair, Transportation Advisory Board SE:jlm cc: City Administrators/Clerks City Engineers County Engineers Enclosure oCT \ - 1992 MEMORANDUM LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. 1500 Norwest Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 835-3800 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Jim Hurrn Tim Keane~ September 30, 1992 Bicycle Path Designation . D" ~r~ In response to your inquiry, I have reviewed Minnesota Sta~tes ~ 160.263 regarding bicycle lanes and ways as they relate 0 the speed regulation of roadways. Specifically, subdivision 2 provi es that a governing body of a political subdivision may by ordinance: (a) designate any roadway or portion thereunder its jurisdiction as a bicycle lane; and (b) designate any sidewalk or portion thereof under its jurisdiction as a bicycle way provided that the designation does not destroy a pedestrian way or pedestrian access. Subdivision 4 provides that notwithstanding ~ 169.14, subd. 5, the governing body of any political subdivision, by resolution or ordinance . . . may designate a safe speed for any street or highway under its authority upon which it has established a bicycle lane; provided that such safe speed shall not be lower than 25 miles per hour. . Based upon the foregoing, the addition of a sidewalk adjacent to Old Market Road for pedestrian purposes would not alter or conflict with the City'S designation of the bicycle way in the roadway of Old Market Road. You should check with Joel Dresel to ascertain if state aid design requirements may preclude the continuation of the bicycle way within the roadway after the establishment of a separate pedestrian way. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 896-3203. /t . . .... MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 September 30, 1992 Gordon Voss Chief Administrator and Gloria Vierling commission Precinct G, Representative Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth st. st. paul,_Minnesota 55101-1633 Dear Mrs Vierling and Mr. Voss, The Shorewood City Council has requested that you attend its next council meeting the evening of October 12, 1992. The meeting starts at 7 p.m. but we would like you to come around 7:30 so the Council can talk directly with you about skyrocketing MWCC charges. The City of Shorewood has been undertaking an III control program with no MWCC recognition. We have been working with MWCC staff to get a handle on massive III problems associated with MWCC interceptors within our community, and to identify ways we can measure what the real III problem is. The proposed $122,500 increase in charges in one year reflects an increase of over $52 a year per household. Because of the MWCC's high estimates of flow for Shorewood and the resulting 40% increase in charges, we simply can no longer afford to fund projects to address any city III problems. The dramatic increase in charges with no credit or consideration for Shorewood's I/I reduction efforts seems counfer productive to our common goal of reducing I/I. We ask that MWCC follow the recommendations in its Systemwide Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Report (April, 1992). The report recommends "...that the technical assistance, public information, and III reduction goals programs be implemented immediately and that I/I levels be reviewed periodically." A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore o t I Your report also states: "The present worth of long-term cost savings to the MWCC associated with this amount of I/I is approximately $2 million annually. The equivalent annualized capital and O&M savings represent approximately 1.4% of the current annual budget". Lt seems Shorewood's 6,000 residents are being asked to pay over 16% of what the MWCC would save if all municipalities reduced I/I as much as possible." Please feel free to contact me to set up a meeting with staff before the October 12 Council meeting if you would find it helpful. We look forward to working with you to achieve a rate/funding system that is more fiscally responsive to the needs of local government and to find a more accurate way to measure our contribution to MWCC sewage flow. Sincerely . James C. Hurm City Administrator cc: City Council Tim Keane, City Attorney Joel Dresel, City Engineer Al Rolek, Finance Director . , I" , .~ ~ i(". \ 9 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 L. () . '-/ :1 / (}y~z-'/ V[JL, Ij , 612 222-8423 August 14, 1992 Mayor Barb Brancel City of Shorewood City Hall Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Brancel: . The purpose of this letter is to provide you with information regarding the 1993 sewer service charges on the enclosed statement. The annual se~er servi~e cha~gcs are based C~ th~ estimated volume of Shorewood's sewer flow relative to the estimated flow from all sewered communities using the Metropolitan Disposal System. When 1993 is completed and actual flow for 1993 is known, these estimated sewer service charges are adjusted accordingly. They are also adjusted for any deviations in the Commission's revenue or expenditure budgets. The statement shows the estimated wastewater flow from your community and its sewer service charges based on the MWCC's 1993 budget. The 1993 estimate of your community's flow is based on past flow records, precipitation trends and anticipated community growth. The statement also shows any credits or debits from these sources: Current Value Credit, Debt Payment Credit, and the 1991 Final Cost Allocation. . I am forwarding a copy of these and a 1991 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to your finance officer. If you have any questions, please let me know. If you would like additional copies of any of these documents or the MWCC's 1993 budget, please contact Lois Spear at 229-2017. V~l~~ Louis R. Clark Chair CRW:CJW:pap Enclosures cc: Finance Officer Commissioner Gloria Vierling Gordon O. Voss, Chief Administrator, MWCC Lois I. Spear, Controller, MWCC L081492.SSC Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ~ .....0 () (- , METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED 1993 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES (WHOLE DOLLARS) 5182 Shorewood GALLONAGE CURRENT USE CHARGES: SEWER SERVICE COST 360 SALES TAX TOTAL SEWER SERVICE COST OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES: CURRENT VALUE CREDIT DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 1991 FINAL COST ALLOCATION TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE MONTHLY INSTALLMENT Due on the first day of each month. Installments not / received by the 10th of each month in which due shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest from the first day of such month. ESTIMATED COST FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT 1201.10 432,396 6,089 438,485 391 o (122,820) (122,429) 554,820 46,235 .. . . "'-. . . , Cr!.-" (j Q.., Qfni4). ~ C!-(! ~ tt:1 ?I J.lli9A Metropolitan Waste Control Cb~~ission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 612 222-8423 @ August 25, 1992 Mr. James Hurm 5755 Country Club Road Shorwood, MN 55331 SEP - 2 !992 Dear Mr. Hurm: The Commission has just completed a mid-year review of the actual 1992 flows as compared to the 1992 estimated flows. The Commission prepared the 1992 estimated flow for the city in March of 1990 following three years of dry weather conditions. Since then the rainfall conditions have changed, 1991 had a near record rainfall and thus far in 1992, the rainfall is above normal. The Commission tries to estimate flows based on normal rainfall conditions. Historically, the city's flows have generally been higher when rainfall is above normal and lower when rainfall is below normal. Another factor contributing to a flow increase may be an underestimation of growth within the community. Based on measured flows through July, it is anticipated tpat your total year end flow for 1992 will exceed the estimated flow by approximately 42 percent. This assumes that the rainfall conditions through the end of the year will continue at a normal level. This would result in an underpayment of approximately 42 percent for 1992. The underpayment would be carried forward and added to the 1994 cost allocation. The Commission is providing this information to you at this time to allow the City time to utilize this information during your rate setting process. .If you have any questions in this regard please call. Sincerely, ~G'le20. J-... Gordon O. Voss Chief Administrator GOV: CRP: jmb Shorewood Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ~0 .. CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Krist; Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council ~ FROM: James C. Hurm, city Administrator DATE: October 9, 1992 . RE: Agenda Item No. 7 - Shorewood Oaks stop Signs The Ci ty was contacted by Shorewood Oaks resident Keith Forss asking us to consider the placement of stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Maple Leaf Circle. Attached for your information are comments from the Police Chief and city Engineer on the latest request dated October 1, 1992. Also attached for your reference is a color coded map indicating where the signs are located with a history of each sign. This issue is arising again because a year ago the City Council on a 2-1 vote authorized the installation of stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Burlwood Court. The comment was made at that time that we could review the situation in a year. The staff is unanimous in its recommendation against the additional stop signs. . JCH.al Attachment A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 1 . . ~~AY 3 \ \99\ :~~ .~ . II = :=,-rop S\~"1 ,A.~D --? D\l:tE.C.iloN ~ : TRAC:FIC. B~K SToP Sl6N ~Pa;AL fC~ ~\-\{)~SWCOD OAKS, SUSDIVl.Slc\'4 . ~EE A\"TAC.l-\E:D PST\T10N ~D COVER.. LETTER Previously installed Installed 6/91 (Res 64-91) 10/14/91 - installed on motion by Council D 9/92 request OCT 08 '92 il:-3i 0511 i'lPL5, MN P.4 October 12 1992 REOUEST FOR r~UT Police Chief2 City Engin~e~ Director of Public Works) Planning Director and Finance Direct"or." ."~_.. v_ 00- FROM: James c. Hurm, CitY~Administrator ~nput:Requested for: ~-;t-y en"","''; 1 M.........r1g o~ O,.t-"~",,.. 1', lQQ, Please Reply:by: Q~~ob~-r' 7. 1991 ~ ISSUE (Problem Definition): The Shorewood Oaks Homeowners Association has asked the City to reconsider two (2) stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Maple Leaf Court. Previous scaff.memos on the subject are attached with color coded map of sign placement listings. 1. RECOMME.""lDA'1'ION: -0 do. J , F~C:1n"""40?;1 C:"la' ~ 2. OISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: ':;;7';...! ~ .J-o\ 7- rl1~::...-f e:~6/i;t/ 6...JOi'r-O;'1-1s, and t?~ ~I7{/Qr<''1';iy , b~/r") j <:2 sKJ j)/ ~ s/.:t.u ..).rQF{'t(!.. Pc/l~'" ~~pJr/-s Ind, ~..../< f~f ~r :J:lc;:.i..s ot V~ t.: <:"k.s C'I? 5krc.tJ.J~ u/ o~ K.s 'by-~ /"~ / b-. I- c..ddt';4lh~ eh~r<-eht~.,,,,..j- )'nQ'j be ~41" J-.:'n /../. ' J . FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: T.O_ signature r.-// Title ./ ,."/ /7 A ., Date ~ ..- {-;-o<>,/.;" <!!...'!,~ . , Adminis~~ator Comment: , ;-,.~ "-' ~. DATE: October 1, 1992 REOUEST FOR INPUT TO: Police Chief, City Engineer, Director of Public Works, Planning Director and Finance Director # FROM: James C. Hurm, CitY~Administrator Input Requested for: r.iry r.r'll1nril Mt>t>r;ng Qf ()C'f"nhp1'" l?, lQQ? Please Reply by: October 7. 1992 ISSUE (Problem Definition): . The Shorewood Oaks Homeowners Association has asked the City to reconsider two (2) stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Maple Leaf Court. Previous staff memos on the subject are attached with color coded map of sign placement listings. ~. RECOMMENDATION: ~e;e ~R.e:v,C)\JS ~.e:vnO~t>~N\. -, _ -00 ~QT \(2..c.o",~e;~t) ~ E.. \~S.'TA'-~\ofo,J Oi=- ~G"s.ca ~\b~~. '"I'-oo Ntrr \l.h~K T~os.e tU2.e:c..\"e5> ~\ Bu'<l.\..\I..10C':D c..ouO-"'\' ~6Ei"'\ 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: ~'"'\"t\r,~ W ~o(Z"i1..A fo-},c::. . . 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT::C ""Do '" t>> T ""~\J6 %\A.~~ ~n 't=\ Sc..f\-L ~~S.O~e..~ \:b 2.~f:Oll.u;: "Sua~ ~\bN6. c.oA-~c..e \j ~ E)~ A- V O~~T~Q..~ 1396\S. T\o\!.. i\-U .....\ L.~ t> LS f..~ i=e..c..'" ~ 6 1..-Y' fV\ "A \ ~ \.r \ t) .. Z-~Z Administrator Comment: . . MAY 3 \ \99\ 26060 Shorewood Oaks Drive Shorewood, MN 55331 May 31, 1991 . .. City of Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear City Council members: Attached please find a petition from the homeowners of the Shorewood Oaks subdivision. This petition represents great concern and desire for change on the part of these homeowners in regard to the speeding and dangerous driving taking place on the streets in our neighborhood. Shorewood Oaks Drive has become a popular cut-through for many non-residents within the past year. We are finding that meny of these drivers are coming through Shorewood Oaks at speeds of 35 to 40 plus miles per hour. The current 30 m.p.h. speed limit and the lack of any stop signs is promoting people to speed in excess of 30 m.p.h. thus creating dangerous situations for the many children who live and play here every day, Homeowners have taken to standing in the street to block these cars, and phoning in tag numbers to . the police. We feel that the time for change has come as this neighborhood is more that 50% complete. Currently there are 75 homeowners and 49 school aged children in Shorewood Oaks. We were informed that this petition would be on your agenda for your June 10, 1991 meeting. After reviewing it prior to your meeting would you please contact either myself or Mrs. Faber to inform us if we will be on your agenda, at what time you would like us there and if you would desire for all participating homeowners to attend as well. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, c:!tfV!/t4f~IC.~ -;Jdt1f~dt.W Monique R. Droege (~10'~~3Z) Shelly Faber (410-<1"44) ~~AY 3 \ \99\ ].~) (g) .- ~ - - - - -., .- -- - - ----. ~ I J, .~~ 1lI<-: - -. '. l;>!l ~"OR.E.W_ o~kS <81 ~ I I I I I I I I I I L I I · L' I : : - - - - - -....--.-.-..--..-.......-----.. oPt\(.. u:A-F -nz..A 1'- . . = ~'1"CP S\~N -,"wo ~ OUU:.cnoN ~ :: TRAJ:FI C. 6~l<. ~TOP Sl6N ~f'as.AL FO~ ~1-\{)t2..SWCOD OAKS SUSOIVI.SIO\'4 ~EE A\"TACl-\e=D PST\T10N AND COVER.. LETTE.&t . HAY 3 \ \99\ PETITION OF SHOREWOOD OAKS SUBDIVISION TO SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL We the undersigned residents of ~rewood Oaks SubdiVision would like to request the Shorewood City Cou~cil to change the speed limit on the roads or Shorewood Oaks Drive, Maple Leaf Circle, Burlwood Court and Oak Leaf Trail to IS m.p~h. We request that speed limit signs pe posted at appropriate locations on al4laf these'streets. We request that Slow Children at Play signs be posted at apprcpr~ate locations on all these streets. ~e request that STOP signs be posted at appropriate locations (as per suggested attached diagram) to break the traffic flow alo~the through streets. --- ~~ame (Print) Address #Children Signature i\,~RK DROEGE 1kt;)(d) :Shorewoocl Caks Oc- \C~Jl<il1JE. D(tQcGE II .. ./.. ~ ("'J- , . '(:~aJ U \1J 't. T"'\\'l-1.\ ~CIO~() ~CR,,~w~o~~~ "'n lllibadtJ o..to07~ SIlor~!HJcc( OaK5 !Jr. 2 \I ~ '~ ~ -rHIt3A06 2667s-' SH-c't~~ooD ()AKS O/~ =< ~~-ft~ L~fj ~J"~11 ,,"01$ .shdr~w..J.. Oaks Dr. J.. J-/~ ..J L, /j e:ren ;;(.015 $hdr~"'dcd. o.ks Dr..1 f?,.'~_..a'.~~_: ~1/J7A- r/ju4- ,,1('I'Tr .511t:J~i.Voa]) oA!<.5 J7A.~~:. ~ i:'1~S P/5lJ.L!f d.bl=tS StbeGW~.b o,q~s ])f. ~ .- Pt.,E7'C.H~ 2..Corqs L, 't" '2- ~ ~~ .,.; PLe-rCHetJ. It I. 4',,"Z. JOr--- p~~~ o ;L Phone ~7o.9 '73 z. 41 i ;'-I~?r- Lf 70-9 /~1 1/7~7/" J t/7tf-JoZ 7 <f7f -JoL7 71~-/7'7}:; 17'1- I~l./q ':f 7'0 - S'b 3 Y .:1)1'(" 3 l \99\ Name (Print) Address # Children Signature pho[1e J:.",,~1(" M ((}.iG ~~3 Lfo ~ h~r{:lnaJ O~k:r Dr 1:1 d-. ~ ) ct LjYO---1JJ'S ~Ib 1'1 cLd.~ dL.3L-fo ~hoieuoo~ O~k:s or d..fP~( "-!Yo-. rj'~i? >> (f-~ 8--6360 ~ ~J::)'M ~ '-f.7<{.-~1f7::: f"\ f3, v r tJ ~ fi F ~ f{" . - . . r1 0 ~ '= . - 'e . . PehC -j ~ dJ.Q.. 3</ 5 Oak:. .Lea-+ -rrczi. <.. -#-1 jj)a;t--! W>ta- 4'7 0 -O~; /1 /1. _..J.hu.$~ ~ h/I._~L 1..:::>t.if1J ~u/I!>Ef<!S) OlGltJ..s~ OiJtG ;Je..i~,o 1'7"./(,/ 'g-j~6EIWJ t. ~ t' 0 _~ I( 5u~ toLo fJo u..~OS d<Gd. IS Skrew:cd Oak: b!ue*1- - 0 t./;V-/3Ii au- 6L~!bU.L{).s f,6:YS !k~ca~ d11:s- jr;uR.~~ . ~ ~ ,~?c.j-/3/J 1'--.11 jl ztRvzS CJ~ ~ -rtZ.. :j wcoO.f(o /~'/1 :;Aglj(fi./.J ....... ~ oAt::::"- ~?:e. ~hb~~#q ;J 47cJ)-O/J !!.;2~ U~/''''!.b 2-&7-:.2,0;..1 ~ . L... ,::::.ea-rTy- &/Jcrec..t.JcoC::/J?=- ~ ,I/o ' 77'7'- ~7' Uo/! ;-/e/.n~ c;;(&o/G <....IQ~ 7Lcvn~ ~u~-:z, -< V ~~"-NLd&J70 0* c&2p~ 7Y( 5~) ~ YJy-J/ I. 0. I _ -0c: . ~ /tJ ~ d :>- OL~ 11..\I~;<S. 021.:.0," S- Urh~ LC~F- J~ dtroR..E:wccb - . ~ 170-;;;; /~.t~ ~(.,C14~ 6~1-.uL r~ ~~ +~~7P. vu./ie IJrj~ 2.~/SS GhOJ-:vJdOcl OCi.J)S On've fa/ d:J;Ut; Lf1C;-S"~ ~5 ;<~,L:5:5 ~(J~Mt'd O&;b~ #/ ~ '1lY-~~ 1 o.:\f.4.. ....ltI\a..:D...-e {" Q(a)5S Sl--or { ." 0 d~ Ci:J<S::Dr ~ ~()-Jj; -' CITY OF ~(Q)~'\f SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCl L Knsti Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator tJ-. MEMO TO: Mayor and Councilmembers . DATE: June 4, 1991 RE: Agenda Item No. 9 - Shorewood Oaks Petition The following Departments have been proposals contained in this petition subdivision: asked to from the comment on the Shorewood Oaks Bradley Nielsen, Planning Director Donald Zdrazil, Public Works Director Joel Dresel, City Engineer, OSM Richard Young, Police Chief, SLMPSD Tom Neudahl, Fire Marshal Comments which have been received in time for the packet are enclosed for your review. . Recommendation Because of the serious nature of the subject matter, Council might want to take more than one meeting to discuss and consider staff comments, merits of the proposals, and possible alternatives. all __ ,,'r. ......~..... -f /i j"-':: .:.>'..' ........~_. ,1- ,{___.:~"__-,-----.---- - -' / , ... i -> ,.... / /... ..; -'- A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore REOUEST FOR INPUT ~ .. DATE: MAY 31., 1.991. TO: TOM NEUDAHL, FIRE MARSHALL FROM: JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Input requested for: June 1.0 city council meeting Please reply by: Wednesday, June 5, 1.991. ISSUE (Problem Definition) : . Residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision are petitioning the City council to take several steps to slow traffic in the area. Please review their communications and comment. (use this form or attach separate memo) 1. RECOMMENDATION: ~J ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~~~~M ~~~~ . ~U'- tb~-~~ ~~~-ae~~ ~a~~~ ~~"L~J L~~",~;7 J 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: ~:J;~~~ ke ~'~ci~~ 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: ~~ Signa.ture/ ~ ;7 &;e4~ Title ~-$- /'/ Date Administrator Comment: . . REOUEST FOR INPUT DATE: MAY 31, 1991 ~ .. TO: DON ZDRAZIL, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: JAMES C. HORM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Input requested for: June 10 City Council meeting Please reply by: Wednesday, June 5, 1991 ISSUE (Problem Definition): Residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision are petitioning the City Council to take several steps to slow traffic in the area. Please review their communications and comment. (use this form or attach separate memo) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Stop Signs should be located only on each end.: ut Shore~.;ood-Oaks Dr., Burlwood Cou: at Shorewood Oaks Dr., Maple Leaf at Shorewood Oaks Dr., and each end of Oak Leaf Tr3.il.. Request could be made to increase police patrol in area. 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: . B..oadway should not be a factor in reducing the present speed posting. A enforceable lintLt under 30 m.p.h. must be approved by the State of Minn.. Addition winter sanding will be required as more stopping zones are added.. 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: STOP SIGN/POST= $51.71 SLOW SIGN/POST= $66.21 SPEED SIGN/POST= $47.51 Number of Slow and Speed signs not made clear in request. ~ -0'- /" Date d -f~ J'uil/ t: M)j'/r:, , Administrator Comment: RECEIVED JUN 3 1991 REOUEST FOR INPUT DATE: MAY 3~, ~99~ .. TO: RICHARD YOUNG, CHIEF OF POLICE FROM: JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Input requested for: June ~o City council meetinq Please reply by: wednesday, June 5, 1991 ISSUE (Problem Definition): . Residents of Shorewood Oaks Subdivision are petitioning the City Council to take several steps to slow traffic in the area. Please review their communications and comment. (use this form or attach separate memo) L RECOMMENDATION: ~ ~R.C..\J-e:n ffi~D 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: . 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: G,~ 3r9 J Date Administrator Comment: SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFElY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG Chief of Police (612) 474-3261 .. HEHORA!!DUH To: James C. Hurm, Shorewood City Administrator Richard A. Young, Ch:ief of Police \ June 3, 1991 From: Date: ~ Subject: Shorewood Oaks area petition ~ The petition presented asks for the speed limit on certain named roads to be reduced to 15 MPH. No such reduction may be made without approval of the State of ~nnesota. They will require a speed study and great documentation for any change in speed limit. I would not expect them to grant any change in the speed limit from the statutory residential speed limit of 30 MPH, certainly not to 15 MPH. I am not aware of any local speed limits that are set that low. Shorewood Oaks is a new street system with wider streets and curbs than in a large proportion of Shorewood. Speed l:imits are normally set at the 85th percentile of normal traffic. Speed limits are, therefore, set with the knowledge that the 15th percentile of all. .traff:icwHwi+l normally be_. violating-.!:_~f:!___ ___ speed l:im:it. Studies have shown that a lower speed limit will not usually reduce the speed of traffic, but rather make more persons law violators. (See attached). Another issue is the level at which traffic citations are issued. As you may know, the police department can not issue citations for only a few MPH over the limit. The court system will not accept them. We are forced to write citations based upon the level of acceptance of the legal system. This is very well defined in Hennepin County. (In my opinion this "tolerance" is increasing.) Most of the speeds referred to in the cover letter to the petitions would fall within that "tolerance". Should the State of M:innesota allow a different speed limit than the statutory speed l:imit for residential areas~ I certainly would encourage the adequate posting of that speed limit. The request for "Slow ~ Ch:ildren at Play" signs is also an issue in wh:ich the State of M:innesota has taken a very definite stand. They do not recognize such signs. They are not legal. During recent studies, in our area, of traffic control signs and devices, the State of Minnesota recommended all such signs be removed. One reason I heard for this was the ineffectiveness of the signs. Serving South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shomvood and Tonka Bay Apparently studies have shown that most drivers do not see the signs and for those that do, there is no effect on their driving behavior. The request for stop signs should be considered in relation to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The State of Minnesota has adopted this nationwide manual. I have included a copy of the portion relating to stop signs and their placement. There are four warrants -.jor the placement of stop signs. In reviewing the petition for requested locations, the warrants can be applied to only some of them. I think everyone would agree that Shorewood Oaks Drive is the main thoroughfare. Therefore, the following requests could be considered under warrants numbers one and/or two: Oak Leaf Trail at Shorewood Oaks Drive - Both Locations Maple Leaf Circle at Shorewood Oaks Drive Burlwood Court at Shorewood Oaks Drive There already is a stop sign on Shorewood Oaks Drive at Strawberry ~ Lane. - The other requested locations, Shorewood Oaks Drive at Maple Leaf Circle and Burlwood Court do not appear to meet any of the warrants. They appear to be more of a speed control device. This is specifically mentioned in the manual as an improper use of a stop sign. The City of Shorewood has denied other requests for like stop signs. The City of Shorewood has also recently removed stop signs which were felt to be used for speed control only. The police department takes no position on the petition, with the- exception of the stop signs which meet the warrants. I feel those signs should be erected. The other requests are subject to the State of Minnesota, City of Shorewood or the manual as published. My comments are meant merely to inform the City Council of factors I am aware of which might impact their decision making process. We A, will do our best to enforce, within certain guidelines imposed upon ,.,. us, whatever regulations are in place. If you or the City Council have any questions about this, or any other matter, please contact me and I will respond as soon as possible. SPEED LIMIT SURVEY Driver Speed Behavior on U.S. Streets and Highways Samuel C. Tignor,.ph.D., and Davey Warren ... Introduction Preliminary Results During the past five years. the Federal Highway Administration has Driver compliance with speed limits is poor, On average. 7 out of 10 sponsored a number of studies to establish a belter understanding of motorists exceeded the posted speed in urban areas. Compliance ranged travel speeds and speed limits on various types of roads. The study of the from 3 to 99 percent. Compliance tended to be worse on IOw.speed speed zoning problem was prompted in part by concern about wide- roads. better on roads with prima facie limits. or where the speed limit spread violations and the seemingly arbitrary level of many posted was based on an engineering study. Better does not mean good compli. speeds. ance; less than 10 percent on the sites had more than 50.percent obedi. Speed limits are intended to inform drivers of the maximum reason. ence with the posted speed. able and safe travel speed. However. there is little agreement on what On many streets and highways the speed limit is set 8 to 12 mph be. constitutes a safe speed. In a nationwide survey of current speed zoning low the prevailing 85th.percentile speed. The extreme case was a prevail. practices. all states and most of the 44 localities reported using the ing speed of 51 mph in a 30.mph zone. Truck speeds were consistently 85th.percent,!e speed a:: the =3::;: factor in ::e:ting ~p"ed limits. How;:v. 3 mph slower th:ln car speeds in urban areas. The factors that had the er. the posted speed is often set up to 10 mph lower than the prevailing most influence on speeds were number of access points and commercial .ed based on a subjective consideration of other factors such as road. development. development. The relative subjectivity of the speed zoning process The accident involvement rates on streets and highways in urban areas , ts to the need to re-examine the criteria and procedures used in set. was highest for the slowest 5 percent of traffic. lowest for traffic in the ,. . tlng speed limits. - . 30.to.95-percentile range and increased for the fastest 5 percent of traf. .' Properly established speed limits foster voluntary compliance and sep. fico The relative involvement rate is a measure of the chance of being in. arate the occasional high-risk driver from the vast majority of drivers. On volved in an accident. and is a ratio of the percent of accidents in a given the other hand, speed limits whiCh are set artificially low tend to be ig. speed range to the percent of travel in the same speed range. ,,' no red and misallocate resources. apprehending and prosecuting motor. For each accident that occurred at a site, the speed of each vehicle in. ists driving at safe speeds. Over time this could lead to a loss of respect volved in the accident was assigned to the appropriate percentile speed I.; for all speed limits and create the [mpression that traffic law enforcement category for that site. All suCh data from ~ach site were then combined I , . and the judicial system are unfair. The same public when emotionally and the relative risk computed. The risk curve for roads in built.up areas aroused demand and otten get reduced speed limits by believing the low. is consistent with the work of Solomon. Cirillo, and West, and Dunn which er limit will slow down traffic and reduce accidents. showed that the risk of involvement in accidents is minimum near the av. Even though a great deal has been written and said about speed limits. erage speed of traffic and increases dramatically for vehicles traveling there is almost no scientific research on the precise effects on the much slower or faster than average. The rate at which drivers experience number of accidents of altering speed limits. Most traffic officials . overtakings follows a similar U.shaped relationship and provides a theo. agree we should be working to improve our knowledge of the effects of retical explanation for the shape of the speed.risk curve. speed limits and to develOp criteria that are Objective and scientifically Many current speed limits coincide with 30.percentile speed. which is i" sound. near the lower bound of safe travel speed, Speed limits should be set in This paper presents some preliminary results of our research on speed the 70.10.90.percentile r3nge or roughly 5 to 10 mph above tJ:le average I~: limits, speeds. and accident risk. The final results are not expected until speed to correctly reflect maximum safe speed. Speed limits are set in I:.... early next year. multiples of 5 mph: the 70.to.90.percentile range will almost always in. I ":. Data Collection elude a 5.mph multiple. Allowing a 5.mph tolerance. enforcement would ...... The basic data for the analysis described here consists of speeds from then be targeted at drivers who are clearly at risk. If speed limits were raised to more realistic levels. would drivers automatically drive 5 to 10 ;;:110 separate studies. In one study, data were collected to determi.ne . i' characteristics and the reasonableness of speed limits on low and mp" over the new speed limit as is commonly believed? The answer IS no. erate speed roads in urban. small.urban. and rural built.up areas. Raising the speed by various amounts up to 15 mph has little or no effect .: peeds were measured for a 24.hour period on 52 roads and streets in on speeds over a broad range of road types and speed levels. . four states: Delaware. North Carolina, Colorado. and Arizona. The mea. Conversely. lowering the speed limit will not slow down traffic. AI. surements were made with the IRD 1040 traffic statistics recorder con. though speed increases of 3 mph and decreases of 3 mph were observed at individual sites. the expected change in speed is less than 1 mph. nected to a pair of loop mats in each lane. The equipment stores the ar. which is normal variation. In addition. there is no evidence in our studies rival time, lane. speed. and length of each ,vehicle. The sites were ed randomly selected from the Highway Performance Monitoring System .that raising the speed iimi. to 65 on rural inters.ate freeways I to an. using a stratified clustered sampling procedure to represent different increase in speeds off the freeway. road types and speed laws. Accident data were obtained for a three. Conclusions year period and the relation between accident risk and travel speed in It would be premature to draw any firm conclusions since the research urban areas was determined using the estimated travel speed before is still underway. However. the findings to date suggest that. on th~ aver. the crash. age. current speed limits are set too low to be accepted as reasonable by A second study is taking advantage of routine speed zoning changes the vast majority 01 drivers. Only about 1 in 10 speed zones has better made by the States to determine on a scientific basis the effects of alter- than 50.percent compliance. The posted speeds make technical violators ing speed limits on travel speed. accidents. and injury consequences. out of motorists driving at reasonable and safe speeds. , . Speeds and headways were measured for a 24.hour period at 102 sites For the traffic law system to minimize accident risk. then speed limIts in 23 states before and one year after the change took place. The mea. need to be properly set to define maximum safe speed. Our studies show surements were made using the Sarasota VC 1900 traffic classifier con. that most speed zones are posted 8 to 12 mph below the prevailing tray. nected to a pair of portable loop mats in each lane. The data were collect. el speed and 15 mph or more belOW the maximum safe speed. Increasing ed in the free. flow mode whiCh classified the speedS in 1.mph bins from speed limits to more realistic levels will not result in higher speeds but 1 to 128. A four.second headway was used to define free vehicles. Dala would increase voluntary compliance and target enforcement at the occa. '. were simultaneously collected at another 102 sites on similar roads with. sional viola lor and high.risk driver. out any change in speed limit to control for time trends. The sites repre. One way for restoring the informational value 01 speed limits requires sent a full range of speed limits and road types including a few 65.mph that we do a better job of engineering speed limits. Hopefully, the results freeways. of this research will provide engineers with the knowledge and tools need. Supplemental measurements were made at some of lhu sites 10 invesli. ed to set maximum sale speecJ limits that are defensible and accepted by gate any spillover effects on surrounding roads. the public and the courts. . ri,nor is ih. chi.f of th. rraffic 54f.ty Res.arch Oivision of th. Federal Highway Adminislration in McLean. Vi'ginia, Warren is II Hi,hway Res.a,ch en,in""r allh. slime fllCility, Chllrts IInd graphs ",. not 'eprin'~. Reprinled by pe,mission of ll1e Inslitute of r,allsportation engineers. S2 S School 51.. 5, W., Suil. 410. W,osh. inaron. oc. O'iginally pulJlish~ in ITE J 990 Como.mdium of Tf!Chnicaf P3O<t'S, ......y 1 S91 ~ ,.. 93 I I ~ II H 'it 1';1i d. Ii/' Iii : I : I: I I : 1:11 1111 I:' ,: .:1 "'1 ii!J, ::!~ ,1:11 1.11 I! ; :, ~ . Ill'; II '. II :.- I' it ~ ", IL r f , . , J '. ! I" : J.' :" .:: f i ~ . .'..; Ii t:,~J ;...........; , , ~, ~ ~ ~:S .5 :......;a en __ ...........o",o:n O.....~r2 :: ~~ :.. eJ ~ :... ;: ~ - eJ ;: eJ ~ ;... .... ~ o .~ (,) eJ m ~ - .... ..... - .., eJ .... (,) eJ ~ ,.g - ~ en - ~.$ ~ ):n = ~ '-AI ~ ::: '(jj.~ 8 m '+-< o ~ o 0 E-; ::.. en.i:: o (,) - ..... I ..... ~ - = !:D i:i.i :::. o - en. i ~ ~ ~ eJ :.. Co 1:: .~ (,) E d :.. .... eJ :.. ~ ;;: m ;>, ~ ;;: '"r:l d o ::.. :.. o ..... - C) ~ - 8 - ..... -, .-I - .s .... d a~ "" - o~;:.n ~ 00 '8 ~.$c.S d.... - .... SO"EJ .en ;.::: gj a Q..- ~~ I :.. o .0 -e = d eJ 1::1)0 c::-:l ~ eJ eJ.o =- .:l~ -"'55 ~ r.J N '(jj ... o CJ ~ - - ::a ;;: eJ. ::.. d ~ ~ Q SO"';jj '(jj c ,.. - 2 ?n - :; :.. C" 1:: en > I ~ I "'. =_6 .~ Q.. ..... 1::1) _-"..9..;0 '(jj - ~ ~ en :: E-; C::..8d~;>'~en. ~;>, .....8 eJ Co) ....... .....,_..= :.- E E -.- <:J ~ 0 .-. ~ 0 "ti ~....-s e ' .en .: .~ UJ ~ ~ ~ '" ,-. ~:... c _ d ,.....o~o5=~ ~ ~ ::'~ ~ = 5 r:n. .... .~ :: .~ ~ ~ _eJ_~ ~_~ _&::.- ga...~~d ~%: ~ ~ - ,... ~ = 0 ~- en ~ 0.00 ~ ~ g 0 r.ri U) a.5 en ~ :::.:a Eo ~ ~ f;S .... e '"0...._ .rn a=-& :: eJ....::" ..... ~ ~ :.. ~ 0 ;:: m~ Od...._ ;>, _ !::1l _ m.sa g; o.S S"n ~ ~ ?;> ~ "'0 ~.rn ~ ~ ~ Ill.8 ~~~~ CD ..:: ~ 'Ene _ 0 ~ ",_:="'=~o== 5 eJ eJ en'z 0 eJ 'a.o (,) (,) ::::: S ~E = fi5 ..... ::::::_~3 g~;:::~~d ~ E "" ..-J.= a: :- ...~ CJ) ~~ o g.g'S ~_:: 0 ~'"r:l=.8~-" -",=? a' ;... ~_~"'eJ!::1l~ S ~ 8 =.= CQ 0 ern"Z ~ ~ - .... ..... :: (,) ~= '? ~ ~ -.... ~ -"' ;>, .0 ::.. ;>, eJ ~~.o ~ ~ ~ - 0 = = Q - eJ "'0 rn ~ ~_ ~ .00 .= ~ ~ C"''O ~ 2.5 en c:;> -l.t .- ~ ~ $~ ~ :.:::.-...::2 :3 5 ... :~.s:: ] ;:... c:J -; ~ ~ C'l 00 0 ~ .00 >- _,::- l:: , ..,4 --;: ~ CJ ~..s~ 8 _ m ~ C ~ t - - ~ a :: :: g.~ g- CJ .":: ;OE'~ ?; ._ c: en ~~-Sa ;:: '+-< S"n''':: ~ 5 P-1.Cii ~ ~ (,) 1:.iJ c ~ ~ _ !::1l 0 ~.~~ l:.O~ - ---~ '+-t ==.= en a ~..::: ~ 1:.iJ(,).B~:: .: c:J en::: :: ...,;a d ;... 0 ,- o:-.d..:=a == ~ ~..... o <J..... .;;: c eJ 0 ~~ rn ~ ] -e :.. - ::~ o _ !:D:: := .... "';jj <:3 o ~ :~ CJ .0 _ - - - - s: Ui rc _ 'A .~g tIl":: - a . ~~ 0"-= t a - .... - .... - - -- := -- - o (.) r:: ~ - ..... t: 'l1 d := ~ - ~ :Ii ;: :: c~ 'fl CJ g.~ ~ ;>,'+-4 ::....... d .... a ,..: ~ Eo 8'(jj lS~ ~c mE-; den. - ,...::.(3 =: ~ ~.9 I C).... ~ ;;: g Cl 0 ~ d"'aeJ eJ .;::l :: en .......,:) ._ ........,. ~ ~ ,.. .:::.s_........ o <:3 <:J m :.. eJ - ... ~ :.l - :: C :: ~ eJ "" - c- - - m,..::: ;>'0 c~ :.- m ... - - ~ =~ ,.~ - d- - -"' ;. .... 'fl -e ~ o ::.. ..... < - ;:) ~ .;~~ -......- ....... ::.. o ..... "'::S eJ m ~ eJ .0 .... o = "'0 - ~ 9 en m So = .rn ~ ~ 000 mE-; Seen. '(jj ~ eJ :!l ... ... -~ i n .... ..... o :: - CJ eJ _ 8= S 0 .... .,gas ::.. ~d S 5 Q) C) :.. - - .... m .- >-< < > ..- ~ ..::~ <=~ - d en "" -~ - ;>,- :.. ~ o Z eJ ...:- eJ m ,.. ~n a eJ_ - :::.. c:" - Q.. ~ :ii C ~~ :="-c...,. - _ 0 ...... 0 o ::l :.. ~ :: - - - - '0 :.. .... = o (,) "'0 C) eJ ~ m Q) -~ . - :: ~':3 rn ....I =.; ~ Co) ~: s ~ ~ 0 ~ > ~.~ ~ "....... g ~ ~ 2 ~ c ,"::.= c:J en - ;..s ...... c o.s :.. Q..- c..;:a ~ ::.. ~.~~ ..c u,-13 c: ~ ":: .;::: Q) ~ ~~ .::-~5 .- 0 ..... ~ - ~ :: 1:n ii1 ~.= .~ ;5 ~ ~ C) m ::.. eJ .... .= .~ - o 'Z ..= d .... m .5 :g o en ~ .... rn = !:Jl 00 :::. Q ..... en. >. d :: .... ..... - = == -:::..~ .8~ en. :>. d ;;: 'Z - - +- ~ =: o (,) E d :.. .... en - .s .... ~ (.) .s:: ..... CJ 0 :: 0 @ ~ - .... 0 == > e=l I ~ C'I CJ ...c E-4 m .C) ~ :5 ... ;E ;;: = .9 .... (,) 3 ...., :: o <J =: '" eJ ~ - ~ "iii ~ ~ --:::: :: ~ .... m ~ ;,. ;.::;:il =~ m - ~.~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ g :: s:: - ;:) o~ g 0 eJ m ~~ - l' ..... ~ - Q) .... ~..:: -- :::.. = tIl :: C3 :: ;>,eJ ;... ;.... -- ~ ~... -- - m _ 2P~ - ,.. 8 - "" -- ~:= ~53:;oo g := ::- -3 <= m en eJ g ... Eo~ '(jj - ~ 8J C'(jj ~ ~ ~~ me ::... <en - ~ - .... Q <= ~ c c_ toe-:: 'A I - ..... (.),y ~..... ..::- d "= <:J ~ p... e E-- en. ;>, == .r: .... - - :: d .... - a :.. ::.. ~ .... ';>' d S ~'::-d ~ v ,... - C3 so "'0- -; .Ci.i ~ C" 0 c:J-",,= ~].... ~~ .E - m ~ ::: c:J ~.~ ~::-. ~~ - ~ ~ - Q ;,;..... ~ .... ~ ..:: :: ~ :.. ::.. == ;. .... .~ CJ E :::"d o ::.. 't5.... - ;>,0 d~ ;;: = ~ g = = 0 - .... ~"'I eJ 0""'= ....- 2; m.~ ~;>,::" ~ ~ co.) C)..=5 5=~ == s.= ~n '8 .0 Q) ::.. d o > - ... ;>, .s ~ -"' - (,) ,- e ~ 5 - <J C3 .- ...... -g c .- Q) ~:3 'Z Q..... Sg~ ~ ~ 0 <5 Cii e :-. c:) eN :::.. :::....... .... ~d .= ~== .Q c.&.o.t Q 0 d - ;>,8 ...:::: "'0 ..~ g - < - '0 (,) o 7n :: 7 .... ,- In .~ - 8 ~ Q..- "8 ~ m ~ m :: o :~ - '0 (.) - ~ ci.i m .... ... a -e '8 <J ~ :: ,.. == oz .~ ..1 ,.=~ _ 0 d- ~roo ~ :: ..... d ~ 2 .:: ,... ~ .s: '0 - ~ s a - [ m eJ ~ '0 > :n ~ <:.l ....~ !:tl":: ,.. ~ .= ... ~o _0 _1.:: 8-" m o - 5_ C3 ..... '0 > eJ l:.O ;:; ~ ~ ~ .g ~ ~~ d E .... m .8 :: '0 ~ ... - c ~ a -:::.. c: d - - d ~ :: 15 ...:: ~ ~ l: ---00 m .;:: g ~ .... ~ ~=- t :no ;.. 2 ... 8 :: 8 ;.0 c; :.. ::.. d ~ ...c ;;: ::: .9 .... ..:: d <i3ci .S <:.'l E d :.. .... 5 .~ .S ..... .... ~ eJ ~ o ;.. - o - o Cl .2 ;: ...., c: :: ::.. .~ <:J ;;.. :: "';jj <:J -e eJ Q.. o ;>,~ <=..:: - <:J eJ _ "= .... ~lJ - - - .,g .... o :: _ en ~ :: ~ ,... .- - en.: = ~ -" m :3 -e :: c: -" ~ 0 eJ co co c: :: ;... ::.. eJ c:J ~ :.- = ~ 8 Q.. :: 'Cj c: sa ~- ,.. ~ .- - - ... - ... -~ ..!: .Z - 8 (,) ~ gj :::..- , ..... 10 = <Xl - ~~ .... it ~ Q.. ;:~:: ~=~== ~.~ S >:~ ~ ~ :;. e: CJ-e~ ~ ~ In :..- ,.,. .:J ..: - > = ::.. cc d 0 0 _C)....CJ a CJ a ~::~== o i:: .... tIl ~.. ~ ~ :?~... ~ '-*'.::: ;; S ~ _0 :~ ;;: ..... en - - C3 ~- ::..... .,g :: .... Q e d :.. .... Co f: m "= - o <J eJ m Q) > o ~ ~ ~ ~ ""- -.... :.. d - = .~ - "'= m ~,.."'O ~ 8 C) :.. _ 1:J _ _ <J 6> ;<~ ,..:::"'-c:J= _(,)d S ~ e S:: _-dd S z;: o to- .~ o ... I .... 5".0'0 .(jj~ en C) (,) d ..... So '(jj ~ o E-; en. CJ (,) ::: C) .;:: eJ > - o C) .5 ~ .- .... :: ~ .... m oS (jj ... o '"r:l eJ ~ - .~.:..~ Q) ~ = !:Jl 00 :::. Q ..... en. lot Q .... rn ..... = d lot lot d ~ - ~ "":ii m eJ 1::1) ~ m m eJ :: t' - ~ - o (,) eJ en. ~ I ~ ~ ~ o ::... en < "'0 ~ eJ 0 .... :: CJ - - - 0 :.. <= 0 :;.. :-. ,..~ ~ ~ d :: ,.,. rn ~.~ ~__ ~"t - <:J ~ ::: :n C ~ .... - ..... -~ S"o ~_ .Vi :: a... C E-' en. .,g .... ...., ~ en (jj o ~ <= C) eJ ~ - ~ .... .... o Q) :.. o :: ::l <= - ~ - C "iii - ;:) ...., tIl .. X .... eJ 0 en - : .S :.. :.. - ::: "' ,g "'-'- ....,~ ::: "... :: 0 - - eJ ::.. ~ ~ ~ "'C 0 d'"'O <5 ~ :.. N =: ~ .~~ ~"'O - ::: '=: - .~ .~ ~.-a g ::.. ::.. ;>, ~ ~ - - ~ .-; .... ..... - ,.. o ";" "" ...., - - -- .= .:.D .... tIl ~d ~ ::: C - ~ - C <J - .S ~ C) '" 8 .... o ~ eJ eJ ::.. .... m ::.. o ;>, ~ ~ 7.0 := C3 d eJ :.. d .-0 eJ N .- ~ ED '(jj ~ - - ~.c o :: - d ~ :: :: ~ - - ;:j S -; Eo ~ .~ -.;. ~, ,..., en. tbo - ~ .... = "0 0 eJ (.) ~ :.. ai.g fn~ ..... eJ - - - - :: .~ .... <J <:J en :.. eJ "= eJ N "1"""'1 :::. ci --- ~ Q.. - ..." = =~ )-ot ~ d o ~ - - .- (3 .~ .~~ ~ .5 ..:~ S <5 o (,) Q 1:: d~ - eJ --:::: '8 (,) ~ ~ .~ <:J en Q) ~ ~ ~ .S ~ eJ en :8 ::: ~ ~o ~'Ui >:.. <:jC .;: :... _'l1 c:i ~ '0 :.. ~ en ::.. ;: - ...;. e '+-< 0 0"= tIl > ;>,0 ~ =-- ~ Q.. -e tIl c: c.> o !:D :-. ~ ~n ..g 5 ~ ~--...t - ::: :.- ;>,Q) ~ ~ m rn m C) = g .9 ::.... a ~ en a - ..... ED:: .Uj .- Q) -e ~ 1:n ~ ai~""'''3C5 5'=:O=~ ;...~~ d (.) = eJ C) .-0..... ~ 8 ~ c ~= =.2~ ~ d o tIl :::.. ~ roc d <:) ;;. :.. ~ ..,..= 5S ~ c.. ;.. 0 eJ .- :... :-. ~ tIl ,.. .- o >>:-- ::en. ~ .... ,.. 55 C l: Q.. ~ .... -e eJ ~ 1::1) = f :: :g 9 ~~~ a=:::= e .- -' ~- ..:: ~ =_- en :D ~ ~.~ ~ .U; ...... :: g ;>~c..l-of~-- gr-::oS:: ;>,=- ::...;:; :: 0 ~~ :.g~~_. ::: a ~ c C) ,g - - ~ "":ii !:!:- - - .:: .:: z::: - - - ~ 00 m >" ::: - := CJJ.... ~.~ .= ;.. ~ ~c 8 -:... ~~.:n ~ & '(jj :Ii ~ ::: 'n 'fJ :J .... ::..:.. ~ ,- d~ ,.. .- e ::... -?n 3 ... := 0 - m== ;>, .- d ?; ;;: m - - "'Eo;:) ._ eJ - ~ - rn ::.. ., -;:: :::: -:;: C . en eJ .;:: m - S"ll '(jj ~ ,g ,.. - C ::... ?n o en ~ t: C) - ...;. - ~ 8: ~.c C :.. - -~-.;--- .' South lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department 143 OAK STREET EXCELSIOR, M IN N ESOT A 55331.3095 RICHARD A. YOUNG Chief (6121 474.3261 .. MEMORANDUM ~(Q)~W TO: FROM: DATE: RE: James Hurm r Lt. John Hodgdon October 8, 1991 Traffic Survey for Shorewood Oaks and Covington Road. COVINGTON ROAD AND VINE RIDGE (Stop Sign) 411tctober 2, 'i991 2102 Hours to 2116 Hours 20 Vehicles with no violations October 3, 1991 082- Hours to 0908 Hours 46 Vehicles with 2 warnings issued SHOREWOOD OAKS DRIVE (Speed) October 3, 1991 0805 Hours to 0845 Hours .estbound- 22,24,28,21,20,15,17,30,18,19,22,17 Miles Per Hour astbound- 26,30,18,25,26,17,18,26,15,15 Miles Per Hour No Violations October 3, 1991 1506 Hours to 1530 Hours Westbound- 34,31,25,22,23,26,26,23,32,26,23, Miles Per Hour Eastbound- 23,19,23,18 Miles Per Hour No Violations October 3, 1991 1625 Hours to 1725 Hours Westbound- 12,24,20,21,19,28,24,22,15,29,24,22 Miles Per Hour Eastbound- 24,28,5,26,22,20,20,25 Miles Per Hour No Violations October 6, 1991 1524 Hours to 1906 Hours Westbound- 31,32,16,27,21,20,22,20 Miles Per Hour Eastbound- 18,19,20,23,33,23,28,25,24,22 No Violations Officer received a complaint from Strawberry Lane resident that all summer long the Shorewood Oak's residents stand in the street with their children talking and playing. October 7, 1991 0636 Hours to 0705 Hours Westbound- 24,24 Miles Per Hour Eastbound- 26,21,33,18,30,17,33,24,23,14,29,20,24 Miles Per Hour No Violations October 7, .1991 1630 Hours to 1700 Hours Westbound- 25,20,18,29,22,26,25,30,19,20,25,26 Miles Per Hour No Violations . . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kro sri Stover BOb Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (6121 474-3236 TO: Mayor and City council FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator fI- . DATE: September 20, ~99~ RE: Status of Shorewood Oaks Petition . Request for speed limit reduction to 15 M.P.H. State Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has been completed and recommends 30 M.P.H. limit be maintained. They suggest installation of two turn ahead arrow signs with advisory speed plates for the curves. Sians could be authorized bv city Council motion. . Request for speed limit signs - Action completed Resolution 65-9~ directs installation of 30 M.P.H. speed limit signs on both sides of Shorewood Oaks Drive between Maple Leaf Circle and Burlwood Court and on westbound Oak Leaf Trail. . . . Request for "slow children" signs - No Action For a number of reasons discourage such signs. A reason. See the January letter. Traffic Safety Engineers strongly false sense of security is but one ~2, ~989 MnDOT Traffic Engineer's . Request for stop sign placement - Action completed Resolution 64-9~ directs installation of stop signs on Oak Leaf Trail at both its north and east bound intersections with Shorewood Oaks Drive. . City Council should ask the Police Department to become more visible in this area on an intermittent basis. all A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . ?D-J ~(~\~NEiSo'4 ~9. 3 I- :D ~ -\ ~ ~ \<'~ ~ OF T~\l-~ Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 September 10, 1991 (612) 296-2950 _.-., I'"\~;'\ \ 9 .- ~c.r . James C. Hunn City Administrator 5755 Country Cub Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . Dear Mr. Hunn: As requested by the City Council Resolution 63-91, dated June' 10, 1991, the appropriate engineering and traffic investigation has been completed on Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak: Leaf Trail. Based on the District traffic investigation results, we concur with the recommendation to continue reliance on Minnesota's statutory urban speed limit, as described in MIl Statutes 169.14. Sincerely, . cc: OS & Associates, Inc., Shorewood City Engineer An Equal OPPOr!ullil.l' Empklya ~D-3 .. TRAFFIC REGUUnONS 169.14 g" ~ 169.123, th~ Nbich driving, lSare: (1) sue- . ttlS of alcohol req~Uir ents"' ;0 ner. ler u see- .- VIi registration fy the person '. without valid 7 :t to criminal 169.13 RECKLESS OR CARELESS DRIVI.L'l'G. ;..,. Subdivision 1. Reckless driving. Any person who drives any vehicle in such a man- ~d- as to indicate either a willful or a wanton disregard for the safety of persons or prop- erty is guilty of reckless driving and such reckless driving is a misdemeanor. ..' Subd. 2. Careless driving. Any person who operates or halts any vehicle upon any str'Cet or highway carelessly o~ heedlessly in disregard of the rights of others, or in a ~.- er that endangers or IS l~!y to endanger any property or any person, including the'driver or passengers of the vehicle, is guilty of a misdemeanor. ~1.Subd. 3. Application. The provisions of this section apply, but are not limited in applic.ation, to any person who drives any vehicle in the manner prohibited by this sec- tion: ::~.(l) upon the ice of any lake, stream, or river, including but not limited to the ice arany boundary water; or "":(2) in a parking lot ordinarily used by or available to the public though not as a ,~er of right, and a driveway connecting such a parking lot with a street or highway. '.' 0: History: (2720-177) 1937 c 464 s 27; 1939 c 430 s 5; 1947 c 428 s 11; 1967 c 569 s "'~~ExI971 c 27 s 7; 1983 c 236 s 1; 1984 c 622 s 15 [Repealed. 1976 c 103 s 1] [Repealed, 1977 c 347 s 29] 169.14 SPEED RESTRICTIONS. ~:V Subdivision 1. Basic role. No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed 'greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the .actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event speed shall be so restricted ,,'as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle or other conveyance ~on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all ~:persons to use due care. /~ Subd. 2. Speed limits. Where no special hazard exists the following speeds shall be lawful, but any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the sPeed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that the speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall . ~be unlawful: ( 1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district; (2) 65 miles per hour in other locations during the daytime; (3) 55 miles per hour in such other locations during the nighttime; (4) ten miles per hour in alleys. "Daytime" means from a halfhour before sunrise to a half hour after sunset, except ~. at any time when due to weather or other conditions there is not sufficient light to ren- der clearly discernible persons and vehicles at a distance of 500 feet. "Nighttime" " means at any other hour or at any time when due to weather or other conditions there . ',5; is not sufficient light to render clearly discernible persons and vehicles at a distance of 'SOO feet. :.{-:-. Subd. 3. Reduced speed required. The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with :. ~e requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and cross- .. 1I1g an intersection or railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a . curve, when approaching a hill crest, when traveling upon any narrow or winding road- ~. way, and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by ;:I:eason of weather or highway conditions. . ~;' -: Subd. 4. Establishment of zones by commissioner. On determining upon the basis ~ of an engineering and traffic investigation that any speed set forth in this section is ..greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist on any "~tru~ highway or upon any part thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs ~lgnating a reasonable and safe speed limit thereat, which speed limit shall be effec- to carry out 1985, emer- " . ture pertain- .: e rules may ~:" rly ;:he right .~ es of failure ~. .rivi.vi~:.'. ,01 to 14.20 . 4s6 s in physical . wi thin this ion 169.121 or driver's 'oc::.;:ion, or .Ool. 171.14, 9.: 1. subdi- subdivision er iJrosecu- 90 c 602 art ,>~NESO"" . f(~. .> I'. '4 ~ .::;i '< :::J . ,.. -I, I:l: ~ 0 ~ 4- OF T?-Il-~ Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to :.5001 IA1luth Street, Golden Valley. Mf 55422 Telephone No. 591-4605 .. August 22, 1991 James C. Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Speed Zoning - City of Shorewood Shorewood Oaks Drive I Oak Leaf Trail . Dear Mr. Hurm: A speed zoning study has been completed for Shorewood Oaks Drive and Oak Leaf Trail as requested by the Shorewood City Council in Resolution 63-91. Based on the study results and as discussed with you previously, we recommend continued reliance on Minnesota's statutory 30 mph urban district speed limit. (This limit may be posted or not posted at the city's discretion.) Our recommendation has been forwarded to Mn/DOTs traffic engineering office in St. Paul for their review. Assuming they concur, no speed limit authorization will be issued. You will be notified of their action. Also, as discussed with you, there is one curve on each road where 30 mph speed cannot be . safely maintained. We suggest installation of turn signs with appropriate advisory speed plates for these curves, especially since the speed limit is posted. During discussion of our recommendation, you expressed interest in general comments concerning speed limits and SLOW CHILDREN signs. You might therefore find the attached letter and the following general comments of interest. While many people believe that posted speed limit determines the speed of traffic, studies in Minnesota and elsewhere have demonstrated that speed patterns are actually determined by driver reaction to the road environment and by driver attitude (purpose of trip, etc.). Very little change in speed patterns can be expected with a change in the posted speed limit. Why then do we bother to post a speed limit? A speed limit can perform the following functions: -----n/JII/.;"-k-~ " . L/~,.w4e- / ,.......;r- MINNESOTA ---- 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer James C. Hurm August 22, 1991 Page Two - Inform those not faITilliar with a road, what speed is considered to be reasonable and safe under ideal conditions. - Inform those living along the road of the prevailing speed of traffic. - Serve as a basis of enforcement against those who drive at unreasonable or unsafe speed. - Contribute to smooth traffic flow on roads with high traffic volume. . To fulfill these functions, however, the numerical value of the speed limit must be consistent with prev3iling operating speeds. Also, considering the functions of a speed limit, it is apparent that a posted speed limit will be of the greatest value on arterial or collector streets where non-local traffic can be expected and where enforcement activity is likely. Most municipalities elect to rely on unposted statutory speed limits for strictly residential streets - for three reasons: 1) Speed limits have little value on streets where almost all traffic consists of local residents who drive the road daily and where enforcement activity is unlikely. 2) Few cities can afford speed limit signs for all of their streets. 3) If each street were to be speed zoned on its own merit, the resulting array of speed limits would be confusing and difficult to enforce. . If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact Ed Brown (591-4617) at this office. Attachment: Letter Sincerely, /~7 --//// / / , "_C (7"/t'/c/ T. E. Campbell, P.E. Acting District Traffic Engineer TEC:pl:EB ~..,. f~h\ :! ~~ ~ ~~~ Minnesota Department of Transportation District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, LVUnnesota 55422 January 11:, 1981 (6121~ 593-8544 ." DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Municipalities & Townships within Anoka, Carver, Hennepin & Scott Counties Re: "SLOW CHILDREN" Signs Dear Sir: . It has come to our attention that some municipalities and townships within Minnesota are still using black on yellow rectangular shaped signs wi th messages such as: "SLOW CHILDREN" and "T..TATCH OUT FOR CHILDREN," etc. Please be advised that these are not standard signs as listed in the Minnesota Manual on. Uniform Traffic Control Devices and we tnerefore recommend that you remove them from your road system as soon as possible. Alternative signs of the correct diamond shape do exist in the Minne- sota Manual. (Two examples are: sign Wll-X5 "WATCH FOR CHILDREN" and sign Wll-X6 "WATCH FOR PEDS"). To remain effective, however, these signs must only be used in unusual situations. One example might be an area of restricted sight distance where the presence of children is probable and drivers are likely to be unaware of this fact. We do not recommend use of the signs where sight distance is good or in residential areas where drivers should be expecting the presence of children merely because of the type of adjacent development. While we do not presume to suggest that Mn/DOT has any jurisdiction in this matter, we do feel it is appropriate to inform you of the non-conforming use. We have observed a great number of these instal- lations throughout our district. Please call me or Larry McKenzie at this office if you have questions. Sincerely, ~~c P.E. District Trat . cc: L. G. Eilts D. W. Brown L. O. McKenzi.e ., E. Brown File JSK:pl:EB '-'n Eqruzi Opportunity Employ., ~~ ~ . . " /" j 1..../ -4..-:rf , ':~:)m Subject .' ....lufl'OI.O '.IESSAGE /~ J;1 /i./ / -,' ./ =- R EPL Y A-/ .I /, ~ /' .~ --r- lse READ HANDLE APPROVE FO.AD RETURN KE:P OA DISCARD REVIEW WITH ME ,'1 II e /: .., " ,r,...,,,.'.f / ./ " J ......... (' /' . ,1.ct...J !/'")/J p. Speed LTsotter,/.J..... -:t u ~ I / 'l, ; /:.v....___' /..v - .;;!--il/~./ .",", t) 7 '.~ /J- ~ ht ,. Ii, ~/1....-1.."~, ,.~ , ,<"'.' ~~-.., < Ilr..t I,,,; ,0 " ~ , I ..'1 Scot~.t!' 7664 "Post.it" Routing.Request Pad p. From {' ROUTING -~EQUEST I " . ; : To/ ./ ,r ., / A' "'-.....Q -?" / ( C).. . '_~/ ~ ..tLv ! Date ~ _ I ~J7 , ,-. 1'oJ , , , /~ ~ .. ..... 1L/..I./ lte q - ''''-_ .':7/' '1 / -' / . ~!A fr.! ro.:-. _ I. ' . ~/.7 J ....,....... -.,) ":'-~4"" ,4 I..V. /'1 "-- / . / / /' ..-# ,,__...:1./(.-:1 .J ( ~---- ( ~ ~ ~y Signed i?-;~ I / -:- . .<~ .-'-' -L.. /' .0. .... I J'.f / y./ .,G/ ,CJ .If l/'j / ( /' Signed /:j'~! t.-~ ~./ './ RECIPIENT-RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COpy, TURN OVER FOR USE WITH WINDOW ENVELOPE. . CITY OF SHOR~ROOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY. JUNE 10. 1991 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 4 Nielsen said he would like to table the discussion Of~~~~O staff can respond to Einhorn's presentation. the Stover said there was a lengthy discussion at the Planning Commission abou what constitutes a street.~ She said Island View has been used as a road for a long time. She said Nielsen suggested repositioning the house on the lot so that no variances would be required. Stover said the Einhorns want to have a vie~ of the lake and this is not sufficient reason to grant a variance. City Attorney Froberg said he could prepare findings of fact while the staff is researching Einhorn's requests. Stover moved. Gagne findings of fact to Howard's Point Road seconded. to direct the City Attorney to prepare deny the request for variances for John Einhorn at SSE for consideration by the Council at it's next meeti~ Motion carried - 5/0 PETITION OF SHOR~NOOD OAKS SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION NO. 63-~ RESOLUTION NO. 64-S RESOLUTION NO. 65-S Monique R. Droege presented the petition of the Shorewood Oaks residents for the placement of stop signs on Shorewood Oaks Drive, Maple Leaf CirclE Burlwood court and Oak Leaf Trail and the reduction of the speed limit to 15 MFH. The petition also requests SLOW CHILDR&~ AT PLAY signs. Droege said there are many small children in the area and cars speed alons Shorewood Oaks Drive. It is used as a cut through street to Hwy. 7 because a right turn lane is provided on Hwy 7. She said if a right tu~ lane was put in ~ Church Road, the traffic might be reduced. .., Brancel said Public Works Director Zdrazil recommended stop signs only at each end of Shorewood Oaks Drive and each end of Oak Leaf Trail. Also, aT the intersection of Burlwood Court and Maple Leaf and Shorewood Oak Drive. She said a 15 MFH speed limit will need the approval of the State of Minnesota. The police department said a 15 MPH speed limit is not enforceable. 1<d Engineer Dresel said MN/Dot is looking at a turn at Church ~. Nielsen said the City can request a speed study of Shorewood Oaks Drive from the State. Stover asked Droege if the residents had requested police patrol of the road. Droege said they had but have not seen the police yet. Droege asked if the city could install CHILDREN AT PLAY signs. Nielsen said these are not effective. Councilmember Daugherty asked the Nielsen if there could be some safety measure introduced until the speed study is done. Councilmember Gagne asked Dresel to ask Mn/Dot if the Church Road turn lc is being considered. 4 9/)./ / Cj) CITY OF SHOR~NOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY. JUNE 10. 1991 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUE ROAD PAGE 5 ~~~11 Stover moved. Gagne seconded. to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 63-91 "A Resolution requesting the State of Minnesota to do a speed study of Shorewood Oaks Drive." Motion carried ~ - 5/0 on a roll call vote. Stover moved. Gagne seconded. to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 64-91 "A Resolution directing the placement of Stop Signs at both ends of Oak Leaf Trail and Shorewood Oaks Drive. Maple Leaf Circle at Shorewood Oaks Drive and Burlwood Court and Shorewood Oaks Drive.1I Motion carried 5/0 on a roll call vote. . Droege asked the Council how long it will take to do the speed study. Nielsen said it could take several weeks. He said the City and neighborhood can request additional patrols from the police dept. He said this can be very effective. Daugherty moved. Gagne seconded. to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 65-91 IIA Resolution requesting two 30 MPH speed limit signs at Maple Leaf Circle an Shorewood Oaks Drive and one sign at Strawberry Lane and Shorewood Oaks Drive. II Motion carried - 5/0 on a roll call vote. REVIEW CITY POLICY ON WATERMAIN ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 66-; AND REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ON PINE BEND WATERMAIN EXTENSION . Dresel said two residents already had water services available to their houses and did not want to be assessed for the Pine Bend project. He said without these houses the assessment of the Pine Bend_project will rise 20% for the remaining homes. He said the City could pay the additional $8000 out of the water fund. to be replaced when the two homes are hooked up. Stover said this would constitute a change in the City's policy and if the project hinges on a change in the water policy it will not get done. She asked if a new public hearing will be necessary because of the change in price. Dresel said yes. Daugherty asked if the City could assess the proper~ies for the water even though they already have access to water. because they are in the project area. Dresel said the City must prove benefit to these residents. The City cannoc assess someone for something they already have. Gagne said this is another discussion on the City's wacer policy and he wants to have a study session to discuss the problem. He thought the Council had established a policy of majority rule when assessing properties for water. He said the City should take s8000 out 0: the water fund for the project. C" ..J . R~GULAa CITY COu~CIL MINUTES OCTOBER 14.1991 - PAGE 8 ~(Q)L9Y 6. SHOR~~OOD OAKS DRIVE/OAK LEAF TrtAIL S?EED Sl0DY Monique Droege said she received no further reports from the City or the police Dept. regarding spee~~s on Shorewood Oaks Drive. Gagne said the police speed study does not indicate that there is a lot of speeding on the road. Droege said the police were very visible and that potential speeders ~l~ have time to slow down. Sne said she still sees a lot of traffic and there is still a problem. Droege said there are 61 children in the area and 33 under the age of 5. Sne said the City should take resident's request for stop signs seriously. Droege informed the Council that they can install stop signs even if the police do not approve. Droege said the maintenance of a 30 MFH speed limit. instead of the 15 ~ MPH requested by residents. protects the drivers. Brancel said the residents can install sidewalks as a way to protect the children. Daugherty asked Sellergren if there are any legal ramifications if a 15 MPH speed limit is established. Sellergren said there is no problem unless there is a POllCY change. Brancel said officers cannot enforce this limit. Daugherty said it will encourage drivers to slow down. Droege said s~op signs are the only way to slow down drivers. She also said residents are angry that "Slow Children" signs were not recommended by the State because they give a false sense of security. She said residents feel this is a "COI? out". Daugherty said the City should I?lace the S~OI? signs requestea DY the ~ residents and then consider the speed limit and advisory signs. ~ Brancel said a stop sign in the middle of the road will set a I?recedent. Tney are not recommended by ~ne State or the Police Del?artment. Tne Covington/Vine Ridge area will also want these signs. nurm recommended the Council not I?lace a stOI? sign and then remove it. ne said the I?lacement of a stop sign should be taken seriously. If a sign is placed in an area. such as the middle of a road. where drivers are not expecting a sign. it can create more I?roblems than it solves. ne sala traffic engineers do not recommend this al?9rOach and he does ,not reco~mend this I?iacement. Daugherty said the City should place a stOI? sign ae Burlwood Cour~ and Shorewood Oaks Drive and then get feedback from the residenes. Brancel reiterat~d her objec~ion. Daugher~y moved. Gagne seconded to ap9rove the placemenc or t~o scOP signs at the intersec~ion or Burlwood Cour~ and Shcrewocd Oaks Dr:ve. Moc:on carried - 2/1 (Brancel) .- "._" rJ!-, ;/ (CQ)~)f' 6/28/91 RESOLUTION NO. 64-91 - A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ERECTION OF STOP SIGNS AT OAK LEAF TRAIL, MAPLE LEAF CIRCLE AND BURLWOOD COURT . WHEREAS, Shorewood City Code Section 801.01 adopts the provisions of the Minnesota State Traffic Code, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169 (as amended), which Chapter provides that local authorities may place and maintain such traffic control devices upon highways under their jurisdiction as they deem necessary to regulate, warn, or guide traffic; and WHEREAS, the Council has made a determination that such traffic control devices are necessary at certain locations . on Oak Leaf Trail, Maple Leaf Circle and Burlwood Court; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood: 1. That the Public Works Department is hereby directed to erect stop signs on OAK LEAF TRAIL AT BOTH ITS NORTH BOUND INTERSECTION AND ITS EASTBOUND INTERSECTION WITH SHOREWOOD OAKS DRIVE. . 4. That this traffic regulation shall become effective at the time of erection of said signs. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of June, 1991. I ), .' j'1 ~/ . '. . I / .' /> ~::1., /7w;yt/~1C~ b1~'1t:/ '" Barbara JU Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: 11 c-J d. Ll' /.. '.,,-" 1-7t. ,,',' ~ 1"-,, !,tv"" \. /..,:___ _' IIf \..(..\f t.~ [James c. Hurm JCity Administrator/Clerk 'R!~ULA~ CITY CCu~CrL M!NU~ES .OCTOBE~ 14.1991 - ?AGE 8 CC~[?J1f 6. SEOR~~COD OA~S DRIVE/OAK tEAF T?A!L S?EE~ STUDY Mcnique Droege said she received no fu~the~ ~e~orts f~cm t~e City o~ ~~~ ?o lice Dept. regarding spee~~;s on ShoreH'ood Oaks D~ive. Gagne said the police speed study does not indicate that t~e~e is a lot of speeding on the road. Droege said the police we~e very visible and that potencial speede~s c:a have time to slow down. ~ne said she still sees a lot of t~affic and there is still a problem. Droege said there are 61 chil~en in the area and 33 under the age of 5. She said the City should take resident's request for stop signs seriously. Droege informed the Council that they can install stop signs even if the police do not approve. Droege said the maintenance of a 30 MPH speed limit. instead of t:.e 15 . MPH requested by residents. protects the drive~s. Brancel said the residents can install sidewalks as a way to protect the children. Daughe~ty asked Sellergren if there are any legal ramifications if a 15 MPH speed' limit is established. Sellergren said there is no problem unless there is a POllCY change. Brancel said officers cannoc enforce this limit. Daugherty said it will encourage drivers to slow dow~. Droege said s~op signs are the only way to slow dow~ drivers. She also said residents are angry that "SIc',.; Chi Idren" signs were not recommended by the State because they give a false sense of security. She said residents feel this is a "cop out". Daugherty said the City should place the scop signs requested by the residents and then consider the speed limit and advisor! signs. . Erancel said a stop sign in the middle of the road will set a precedent. Tney are not recommended by cne State or the Folice Depar~ment. ~~e Covington/Vine Ridge area will also want these signs. nU~ recommendea cne Council not place a stop sign and then remcve 1~ ne said the placement of a stop sign should be taken seriously. ~~ a sign is placed in an area. such as the middle of a road. where d~ivers are not expec-:.ing a sign. it can c~ea.te more problems than it solves. Ee said t~affic engineers do not reco~mend this approach and he dces no~ reco~mend this piacemenc. Daugher~y said the City should place a s~op sign a~ cur-iwood C0ur~ and. Shorewood Oaks Drive and then get feedback from che residencs. 2rancel ~eite~~~dd he~ objec~i(Jn. Daugher-:.y moved. Gagne geconded to ap?rove t~e ?lacernenc.of ~~O_9~OP 9ign9 at t.he in-cersec-:.icn of 2ur~',.;ccd C-=u~-:. and Sr.o:-e',.;cc::, Oa.-cs ;..I:-:ve. Mc~:on c~~~:ed - 2/1 (3~~~ceL) .- '... 0/. ./ , !. I . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Krist! Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: October 9, 1992 . RE: Agenda Item No. 8 - Request to Reduce Speed on covington Road Between Vine Hill and Sweetwater Curve This petition raises a series of questions for Council consideration. 1) Would a sidewalk on the north side of Covington Road from SilverwoodPark to Vine Hill Road contribute to pedestrian safety? 2) Should the City consider funding some additional patrol hours over and above what SLMPSD can offer? 3) Should Covington be reconstructed at a width that would allow on street bike trails which would therefore allow for the enforcement a a 25 mph speed limit? Memorandums from the Police Chief and City Engineer are attached for your information. . JCH.al Attachment A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore g ( PETITION SEPTEMBER 10, 1992 - We, the undersigned, petition the City of Shorewood to enact safety measures which will result in speed reduction of traffic on Covington Road between Vine Hill and Sweetwater CurveNine Ridge Road. Speeding is a regular occurance on this stretch of road and frequently, dangerously high speeds are encountered. Due to the presence of children and a large number of adults who walk this road, we would like to see reduced speeds enacted and enforced and/or speed bumps installed. NAME x!k;;~ \ - 7 / . /'/'. ~ -- I /L f / ?::-c:{. ~~~ jJ'; 0" [uL~\ GJ/ g Q.,UIY'l (;(;ifl1a~~ /~~~ ~ , , ~ i , IJ tv' ADDRESS . Sjco ~g"z-~~ Ii 9;tJ /I ~-':. ;p /, SC(IO Co~~l;frJC-O". ~7! 0 (' DViJ1'74r-J ~;:? S-9cJo C () (/ if7(jifJl (fsJ SID {t)()I";'T~ q20 . . SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBUC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A YOUNG Chief of Police (612) 474-3261 H~HORAND!lH To: James C. Hurm, City Administrator From: Richard A. Young, Police Chief ~ Date: October 2, 1992 Subject: Covington Road Speed Petition . RECOMMENDATION: Increase police presence through part time officer enforcement as outlined below. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: Speed bumps are not safe and are not effective. As you know, they can also present a great potential for liability for the city. I strongly recommend that speed bumps not be installed. As you also know, a recent City Council action reduced the State of Minnesota approved 30 MPH zone to 25 MPH citing a statute which allows this for bike paths. The street was posted at 25 MPH. However, no bike path exists. Further, we have been advised by the Hennepin County District Court bench, not to write citations alleging violation of the 25 MPH zone based upon a non-existent bike path. . The distance between Vine Hill Road and the stop sign controlled intersection at Sweetwater Curve/Vine Ridge Road is so short that most vehicles would not reach a maximum speed that is ticketable before they have to start slowing down for the upcoming stop sign. We can not write a ticket for a violation that is only slightly over the legal speed limit. Before the courts will accept a ticket , it has to be substantially in excess of the legal limit. The only answer is more frequent police presence. However, we do not have enough officers to have them in the area as frequently as would be necessary to make a noticeable difference in the perceived problem. I will be proposing a resolution to the Coordinating Committee allowing individual cities to hire, at their own expense, additional part time officers to address specific problems such as this~ I do not know what their decision will be. Even if they pass the resolution, an ~ndividual city would still have to have the resources and desire to implement the program in their city. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: Current fiscal and staff resources do not permit addressing this perceived problem as recommended. Serving South Lake Minnetonkil Communides of Excelsior, Greenwood, Slwrewood and Tonkil Bay OCT 08 '92 11:31 OSM MPLS, M~ P.5 DATE: October 1, 1992 REQUEST FOR ZNPUT TO: P~lice Chief, ~ity Engln~~~~ Director of Public W~rks. Planning Direc~or and Fl.nance Direccor H /1(/ FROM: James C. Hurm, CitY<Admini5trato~ ~ I:nput Requested for: City C:ollnril }f....I";"~ ....; (It'"I",..h...... 17 1Q9? Please Reply by: October 7. 1 C}9? ~SSUE (Problem Derinition): Attached petition requests measures to reduce speed on Covington Road between Vine Rill and Sweetwater Curve. ~ . RECOMMENDATION: P-<.~,... f)l ~,..:I d"Cd ~t:# I.:{... t t ~J";-. :3 ~ "';; "t.-/ er'",t;r~~rn~~~ . . 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: pr~ V;" ~ Sf f' =:.?( s:.t /~ 67 /YJ" 0 01 hd.Je- J'n~ d.QI-e:../ 30 '""p h IS rGa;slf>/'~i!-<:, C:f( d'o <.-C no+ .,1, ~ /,..L frt:L rCl7 t:l1 0.0., d r"'~5-J- d<!.t r- -/0 'Stf'~;~ d s-lu dy . . 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: To. Signature C-/ 'r..... Title /t ///3L Date , {;n::;.., _~~ ~ " Administrator Commen~: . . ~ . ~.. .. T ~FIC INFORMATION PROGRAM SERIES ~ pEED.'BDMp8 o WHY SHOULDN'T WE HAVE SPEED BUMPS TO SLOW DOWN THE HOTRODDERS? ~ The control of speeding in residential neighborhoods, while maintaining acceptably safe street and roadway conditions, is a wide-spread concern which requires persistent law enforcement effort. The inability of posted speed limit signs to curb the intentional violat~r, leads to frequent demands for installation of "speed bumps" in public streets and alleys. However, actual tests of various experimental designs have demonstrated the physical inability of a speed bump to control all types of light weight and heavy-weight vehicles successfully. In fact, a softsprung sedan is encouraged to increase speed far a better ride, while same vehicles may lase control. California courts have held public agencies liable for personal injuries resulting from faulty designs~ Increased hazard to the unwary; challenges to the dare-devils; disruption of the movement of both emergency and service vehicles; and undesirable increase in noise, have caused speed bumps to be officially rejected as a standard traffic control device on public streets and alleys. .- .-....";. . - ...... '.. '~~ . -" '. .. ." -:'-:.. .":.... '- ~ . . -':;:. ~. ,. .. . .:. :~'- ~.-::.. :J: .'.: ".~:~~.~.:' '-: ~.~-. - '-' ;', ",- .... ",' .. . ...~.;.. . : ,.: ill) ~ OF; Minnesota Department of T13n~criailon ' Metropolitan District TransportatIon Sulldlr.g St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, OakdaIe, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 - .. Reply to:5&l1 Duluth Streett GJlden Valley. W,554: Telephone No. 591-4617 November 4, 1991 James C. Hurm, Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Speed zoning - city of Shorewood Old Market Road/Covington Road Dear Mr. Hurm: . Speed zoning studies have been placed on our agenda for the following roads as requested in your October'31 letter: Old Market Road - from T.H. 7 to covington Road Covington Road - from Old Market Road to Vine Hill Road Good ~eather and road conditions are required as are normal traffic conditions to determine the optimal speed limit for a road. It is therefore unlikely we can make a definite speed limit determination until the road opens to traffic and weather conditions improve. It might be possible to provide the initial reaction you requested . prior to the November 12 city council meeting. Such an assessment would be based on examination of the construction plans and would, of course, not necessarily be the same as the final spee~ limit determination. We will try to obtain a copy of the plans from our district state aid office, but since there is little time before the November 12 meeting, it might be beneficial if Shorewood would provide us with a copy as insurance. Please send the plans to me at our Golden Valley office. If you have questions, my telephone number is 591-4617. sincerely, UBACWIV Ed Brown Traffic Engineering EB:pl cc: ~ Blerlnger - Q:Uaiale R. Dixon Speed Zone File '-'r~r< '~Ml'NNESOI'A -........;;. 19'JO MnlD0T 29213 (12-78) ~ f(b\ \, "i '" "" '" STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Page 1 of 1 Page LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION Road Authority Road Name or No. City of Shorewood Covington Road I Old Market Road Vme Hill Road ... Date January 27. 1992 Tennini of Zone: From I To Trunk Highway 7 i Date of Request October 31, 1991 Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section. Changes authorized herein are in accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, M.S. Chapter 169.14 and applicable subdivisions thereof. . Covington Road 30 miles per hour between the intersection with Vine Hill Road and the point where Covington Road intersects Old Market Road. Old Market Road 30 miles per hour between the point where Old Market Road intersects Covington Road and the intersection with Trunk Highway 7. . NOTE: The above speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and hazards being signed with the appropriate advance curve or warning signs, including appropriate speed advisory plates. The roadway described above shall be reviewed for traffic control devices impacted by the authorized speed limits before posting the signs. Warning signs and speed limit signs shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. (1) White - Road Authority (1) Pink - Central Office Traffic (1) Blue - District Traffic Engineer for Road Authority use only Date traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization I Month-Day- Year I Signature I Title Jf / MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Krist; Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 . FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator w MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: October 9, 1992 RE: Agenda Item No. 9 Covington Road Request for street Lights on Attached please find comments from the city Engineer and Police Chief. The Planning Director has reviewed the site and concludes that street lights could be warranted at two locationst The intersection of Vine Hill Road and Covington and at the crest of the hill on Covington. At this point in time the annual cost of each street light is approximately $175. . JCH.al Attachment q A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore PETITION SEPTEMBER 10.1992 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Shorewood for street lights to be placed at jointly selected- locations on Covington Road between Vine Hill Road and Sweetwater CurveNine Ridge Road. We believe it is necessary for reasons of safety. Covington Road is very busy at this location and speeding is a major problem. In addition, vandalism to property has taken place. Most other neighborhoods in this area are served by street lights. No doubt our area was not served due to the fact that for a number of years there was a private street light at 5795 Covington Road. This light was recently removed. NAME ~~..[ c.{,// (( cd ~ ~t-//~ !A5L41()-/b~ ).1;4' f ....,;V vl'{jJ /1 /Ir7.CU/1 ,'(.,. l(v1 .~~ l.-. ! ~. . .~ v.'' /.~ ! ' J .,. .. . .- . '; '.:>.1 "'./-'""" '7-z::..". -'---i'~_;}~if"--')-"'I -(_ ___ _, / v ADDRESS s-9'tiJ (0hf!~V 1a.'. ' S9/iJ ~~ N'. seliC COLli!5~i'1 e{). ~c::. ( 1 ./1::1-/-" i(;v:' 1 ; {J t'v v..'./'"r,;iI'-i / '-- ./ , / - S (7;1(/ /' tel i i , \ 1 i I I . I' . L 0 (/ . J":J-;c.f7 L- 1 :.:::J...-' 57~ W{){j,1'CV- 0J- 61:>D CDvi~t\ ~. It o . . / . . OCT 08 '92 11=30 OSM MPLS, MN P.3 DA~~: October 1t 1992 REOUES~ FOR INPUT 'to: Police Chief, Director of ~ublic Works. Finance Director) City_~~niinee~and ~lanning Director # Il J _. -. James C. H11r>l,. city -~nistrato.r ~ FROM: Input Requested for: cpo;" rom..~q l.1"'eri'I:Jg ~f (>('tober 12,199" Please Reply by: October 7t 1992 ISSUE (Problem Def;nition)~ Attached petition requests street lights on Covington Road. 1. ro;COMMENDATION: 0 J< f',.",..., Or"! e r"! J..~ " a '-;;'7 s ,4.".Ip " ;,." 1 ft'Ot./ ,J~ I --t-44J..J. ? b c.c m~~+ is 0 tJ.-f at (;;.j oyK ~ el'?~ 0- (J f'NfO'S.(".J Ii"'"'>~ rtJ!./~'"ti'!'-I-;; . 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: :I'D. signature G- /., En,':; / J1''::' -c-J.-- Title IDh h<... . Date Administrator Comment: \ DATE: October 1, 1992 REQUEST FOR INPUT TO: FROM: Police Chief, Director of Public Works, Finance Director, City Engineer and Planning Director . .~ James C. Hurm, City"Administrator ~ Input Requested for: (';ry Co".,...;1 ~~et;"g of October 12, ]992 Please Reply by: October 7, 1992 ISSUE (Problem Definition): Attached petition requests street lights on Covington Road. . 1. RECOMMENDATION: ~O~f. 2. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS: ~ -"Qo\...\c.1!. ~"~4R:\'r4\a..s, PrbC2.6e:s ~~, ~e:e7 L\lo'-'" ~ CD W\'f\'1 \<E.b\,,)~ t.f..\ ~6. \\Qu.) ~ \J e: e. , WL ~\..~b 'Fee L.. \'\ rn~'"-I \ NC.~e,A cse ~ ~~:t> ~ v\ ~ \ Bu.. ""''''1 \ ~c...-t2. EAS.eS . . 3. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACT: UN\(~Ou.J U . Administrator Comment: RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROJECT NO. 91458, WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR THE SOUTHEAST AREA, WELL NO. 7 . WHEREAS, on May 28, 1991, the City accepted the bid of A & K Construction, Inc. (the Contractor) and entered into an Agreement for construction of a water treatment plant for the Southeast area, Well No. 7 known as Project No. 91458, and, WHEREAS, said Agreement provided for the Contractor to construct such water treatment plant in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the City'S project engineer, Associated Consultants Engineers, Inc., and, WHEREAS, said work has now been completed by the Contractor, as further described in that certain memorandum of the City's project engineer dated September 10, 1992, attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council of the city of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the City hereby accepts from the Contractor the water treatment plant constructed as Project No. 91458. 2. That final payment be made to the Contractor upon receipt of Affidavit, State of Minnesota Form 1C-134, and Receipt and Waiver of Lien Rights from A & K construction, Inc. . ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the city of Shorewood this 12th day of October, 1992. Barbara Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk 10 MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator ffl./.' f . i , i,i /{i..'.! r/ .v MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 23, 1992 . RE: Request for Additional Consulting Fees for the S.E. Area Water Treatment Plant }f:;:-. Neel Vogan has submitted the final report on the Water Treatment Plant for the S.E. Area Well #7. He plans on attending the meeting to review with you to anwser any questions. . In, addition,however, he has sub~itted a request for additional fees fer engineering services totalling $15,090.25. He has 5ub~itted a three page letter explaining additional engineering costs. The City Attorney has reviewed our Agreement for Services and sees no liability on the City's part to pay additional fee~. JCH.al . A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I \ A ~ ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS, INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 3131 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55447-5323 6121559-5511 FAX 6121559-5514 September 9, 1992 City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, M'N 55331 Attn: Mr. James Hurm, City Administrator Re: #91458/Shorewood Dear Mr. Hurm: The Water Treatment Plant for Well #7 in the Southeast Area of Shorewood is complete. The plant has been in operation since January 14, 1992 and producing good quality effluent. The raw water has an iron content of 2.1 parts per million (PPM). Finished water iron is approximately .03 PPM, well below the guarantee of .25 PPM specified. The plant was constructed for $343,336.23 including changes. This cost is approximately 55% of your city engineer's estimate which was based on a plant that they designed several years ago. Associated Consultants Engineers, Inc. (ACEI) was to be compensated on a fixed fee basis of $40,000. This fee was based on a scope of work which was exceeded by the following items: 1. Landscaping Additional landscaping was added to the project prior to the bid letting. This required issuing an Addendum, meeting with the Park Board and meeting with the Park Board consultant. Engineer Drafter Clerical Mileage 37.0 hours 1.0 hours 3.0 hours 20 miles 2. Underground Piping The existing underground piping was not located in accordance with the as- built pumphouse drawings supplied to ACEI by the City of Shorewood. This required three trips to the site, negotiations with the Contractor and additional design work. Engineer 37.5 hours Drafter 5.0 Hours Mileage 60 miles 3. Control System The control system as-built drawings supplied by the City of Shorewood did not correctly describe the system. Several changes were required at different times as these system differences were discovered. These required seven site visits, additional design work and negotiation with the Contractor and the vendor of the original system. . Engineer Mileage 43.5 hours 140 miles 4. Studies and Testing to Optimize Performance The Specifications called for a guarantee of a maximum iron level of .25 PPM in the finished water. This was to be achieved through a combination of aeration and chlorine injection. The cost of the chlorine was estimated to be approximately $2000 annually. This required twelve trips to the site. The testing duration was limited by the tower capacity since for most of the work, the well was required to run. . The effort resulted in a water quality of .03 PPM and very long intervals between backwashes. The studies showed that this water quality can be achieved with D.Q chlorine in the raw water providing a savings of $2,000 per year. Engineer Mileage 36.0 hours 240 miles . . INVOICE A ~w:.. ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS, INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 3131 FERN BROOK LANE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55447-5323 612/559-5511 FAX 612/559-5514 september 10, 1992 I l City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 L J FOR: Engineering services in regard to Project No. 91458 Shorewood Water Treatment - Extra work. TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES $14,963.75 TOTAL EXPENSES 126.50 AMOUNT DUE: $15,090.25 AMOUNT DUE: $15,090.25 ./l,j}' .) /l; ~-0:.,0L(j,c;,2;;:, ,:- BY mAP.r 3/3/92 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 903 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATIVE TO DELINQUENT WATER UTILITY ACCOUNTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: section 1. Chapter 903 of the Shorewood city Code is hereby amended by adding the following: . 903.09 Subd. 3(b) - Delinquencies: After the last day of the month in which payment is due, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the unpaid account balance will be assessed and added to the amount due on the account. If the balance due on the account is not paid in full within ninety (90) fortv-five (45) days of the day on which the account became due, a notice shall be sent to the property owner or user informing the property owner or user that the account is delinquent and that unless the account balance is paid in full within fifteen (15) days, or other arrangemento for payment caticfaotory to the City are made, the water will be shut off and the prescribed shut-off fee will be assessed. . 903.09 Subd.3(c) - Discontinuance of Service: If the property owner or user does not respond to the notice given above, prior to the date indicated in the notice, and the statement remains unpaid, the water shall be shut off at the curb stop. Prior to water being turned back on again, the property owner or user shall be required to pay all delinquent charges, plus penalties and shut-off fees, and the prescribed turn-on fee. 903.09 Subd. 3(d)- Appeals to Discontinuance of Service: The propertv owner or user mav appeal the notice to the ci tv Council durinq the fifteen dav geriod set forth in subd. 3(b). Water service shall continue to the appelinq propertv owner or user pendinq the decision of the Council on the appeal. Upon the determination of the Council. the water mav be shut off pursuant to Subd. 3(c) as set forth above. 903.09 Subd. 3+a+(e) Tax Assessments: All delinquent accounts may be certified by the Clerk who shall prepare an assessment roll each year providing for assessment of the delinquent accounts against the respective property served. This assessment roll shall be delivered to the City Council for adoption on or before October 10 of each year and upon approval thereof, the Clerk shall certify to the County I~ Auditor the amount due, plus a certification fee as established by resolution of the city Council, and the County Auditor shall thereupon enter such amount as part of the tax levy on such premises to be collected during the ensuing year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and pUblication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this day of , 1992. Barbara Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk . . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 8 October 1992 RE: Vine Hill Market - C.U.P. for Gas Pumps and Variance to Parking Requirements FILE NO.: 405 (92.07) At its 24 August meeting, the City Council granted an extension to Jim Pyle to provide more detailed information on his request for gas pumps at the Vine Hill Market. He was to provide a detailed grading plan, prepared by a registered civil engineer, showing how his site would be altered to minimize driveway grades. . Although the applicant has discussed a major site plan revision with staff, as of this writing we have not received a detailed grading plan. Due to'inadequate information and'the time which has elapsed since the public hearing on this matter (May '92), it is recommended that the request be denied per the staff and Planning Commission's initial recommendations. At such time as the applicant provides a detailed grading plan, he may reapply. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel Jim Pyle A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore t3 FILE COpy VINE HILL MARKET 19215 HIGHWAY 7 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 U'/y',C /'1" /. "... , ; 'j-,,/ ' -' CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SHOREWOOD C/O BRAD NIELSEN 5755 COUNIRY CLUB ROAD SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 AUGUST 14, 1992 ~ ,o.g?.. t\\J~ \ ,-' Honorable Councilmembers: At this time, I would like to request an extension of the motion to table my plan for addition of a fueling facility at the above cited place of business. . Due to slow responses regarding landscaping and grading plans, I do not have the additional details requested by council. Also, MN rot has not provided details on the final elevations, if changed, of the frontage road. I believe that I will have details of my required changes within 30 days and therefore that is the amotmt of time I am requesting. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely Yours, ,~ , ~~ . James V. Pyle, OWner Vine Hill Market 6JGfa 7/ 1'i?2-. . /~ ;4 s: 71e '/;orewo{)J C,-Iy Caunc.i! , ) .- my . /lfl.n7e /s -/ any 'S.fJer; a-Yld.r j/ve w "f'~ my fa-rru1 a.i- 56~S l71,'n'1efonka... Dr/ve here /1-} Shoy<-wooJ. 7"71/5 - lel-Ier /s wr/Her7 ;: I'"egal'Js ~ .,f/,e /rlCU/ldC/hr/?? tfo 1M. tr.!3. he /7jr ;,,,tJKln,g tA-p -ft> {t. € C /If tv 4.- Ie r /,'17 e. y: a. "" jJ..f2 f,. h'M; ,,~ fi'. e C C)l.L Y1 d I ;; yo ex.fr.o- f-,'rn e Iz, ~a..y tf,;.s r:€.c ?/ea...$~ leI hi e ",fjer ~ Sh"rf exp /a.n a..htJrl. · /7/y tv IIe'.s ;:;;'.::I"fe yo 73 ....d J-a-r.s" n //ve 5 /l e x I- cI" 0 y I I a.r 5{,'lS /J11""l1ehR1~':" '))r,'ve. /1;5 ;1lJu..se. ou.r AM",,-5-€. / QI/d -H,e 'f:reJ'1c.j/, house. on me ClJrn€,/ a..1I use. -rhe 5 <i..,,,,'H1_ well. S,nce -tfz e !--rel1cJ;" house Ita.s b.een va..ca..nl ave.r a.. -leaf n 0 ~ .:r have b~e" ff/c..,'J1 +"'-''''' ;"t CUte! ~e:.Y';' / /ir fi.e well. . i3..... J J..4y- .$ ",J./ Ii a.S S t!J / cI I" '5 ~ a uS e. aJ7 d rn t.A.. s I heok '-'-P h c,'fy uJd-er a.S a... part- of fA~ c!o.r;". a. ~ ye 'U>1. e.v'- + . :;:: re.e. / rh,'s I' sa:..;:; " 0 of 7-,'/31 e ;::0 /" m.e. fa d" -fIz e.. Safl1. e. a. 5 I.tJ e {" I5J u./ J Sa. u e. 5" 0 /)'1 e.. rrJ 011 ~ Y fo h~u e.. -tit e.. b a..c. k h 0 l!.. 0 f jU- ya.J-a r J Q -th e.. -fw 0 S e.v-c/ t'c e.S c:..+ D rl e. -BINI..e... I;1J e. htWe. ku e..V\ a.n + ~ c. ; p ",.J ,'VI" Ii 00 k; VI 6 '-'-P r;,. r Z>' b 50J'l'L e -Ii "'I. e c...<4- d h c.. v e. f'I/I. c.. n. G..1 e. d -J..o P 4. +- a. uJ a..j S D(YI. e yYVf) lit e 7 -/-nw-tLv- d --r-4.; s c " s + · . We.. ho..ve. e n.eLL'j 4 fu C {J U er ;h S PHt"6 i'\ (1t2Do.o<>l j,'6,;',ivzo ",-..d COOEU'.r cos-f.-s ;: .--I be z,. ( r r . / \. /fpf'rox "-.n.e.x f pa...9 e) L~ S f- .s ~tJo co' . ')./ I I!JAid {2 Ve YI A o.ve. ~ 0 00. DO. -fa '} /ve -f1z.e (', -Iy ror a.. dbWn (J~Y/J1en f: lie uryenCj 01 fh/s /Yla..ffer /5 -fwo-ro/d. CD 73 u.J /..a.-,,-> 0" '5 h. 0 '"'- ~ !. cf e S ,;" 1 ,. 5 0 (, +n b.er /I, -6..... b Y wh.;c.." +;fVle. h~ lVI.u.s+-- hc..v'12.. w~.Jev hoc,k~J u.p. (j) a....J MOY'~ ~ (vljo D r -ta..vt. ~ -th.e.. I,'n -€. Fro W\. -Ph. ~ LV eJ( ho..s re. c.-e ~+ ('i b Y"D k.e. VI. a.l'1...d w.vt-e r i So . :.:"v./;V\g, el'\. flL'1- 5lArk(,€ ~f OL<..~ '/lJ...rd. /he O';'1cidence.;S rYlind - h()77/~ ';"7 bu.+--fru.e! A fief- '15 ye.ar!> ;1'] f"he 9roun cI ,:.f brea-k 5 Ii-€. '5 <1N""\ e.. Yl'l () 1\ -tk w e. f yt + el-'.J f.:, h () 8 k. u..f · W e. haye.. -to fu.r Yl f"'- e.. pl.l..Y11 p D fF e. Q (. '" d 0..'1 jo f< ee.p ;.f FrltM hu.,,-,,; ~ 0 (A.. f. w ~ lAlou..ld J up 1,/ eLf f>re(i a... fe 'fOrAY" I'VI. -rh ; s W\.a......H...e y- u.. !> we..,", r- '1- + r lA. e I y M. a.. _ h _ cl c..::i ba.. ~ ; 5 [;J ; tt.. re... Yl vt; " d tJ a..f-e r. C e u...l d y 0 LA.. (' 0 n. ~ ~d e r '" ~ ~ () . 0" d" uJ Y\ a....... d q I oo.! 1M 0 fi {( -the {x.....!a..flc-e ,'s (14:./d? /fly wile ~ni and .r 1fl.jJj7reCf~e ,Y~ {.( /c..-K,~i7 rhf.. -j-/me /D hear "CAf (J1.e.o-------- .-;;;;:e fI~J / ,:e Vl e Yl Gi dG-j- /..., J MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kri sti Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 October 1992 RE: Landscape Quotes - Public Works Facility FILE NO.: 405 (90.15) We have received two quotes for landscaping at the new Public Works Facility. While both were higher than the amount budgeted, Lan-De-Con Inc. is the lower. They have indicated that their unit prices will stay the same even if the project is scaled down somewhat. Further, they have some excellent ideas for improving the landscape plan which will also reduce the cost of the project. . Staff recommends using Lan-De-Con Inc. as the landscape contractor for the Public Works Facility. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel }5 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore LAN-DE-CoN INC. P. O. BOX 308 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 (612) 474.2260 FAX (612) 474-0155 JOB NAME: PUffi0 WtJK~ 'f'A~1 U-ry 6~~,M~ L#-l~ ~C}lb ~1? DATE: lo-~- q-z.. QTY. ITEM SIZE I TYPE TOTAL 0 /A ~A<<;.~L/ ~G O'Tr~b 4 I ~ 1?"" ~46v.~ ...s I? f/&{JI dfrlA 5 A-F\ A'~~' ~ ~ 4-/. rlD.~ I~ A~~ .f1Ne. 4' -' ~ ~o- 44.1: 110. 0() -7 t? f1W ~LP....Nt?~ GKA.~ 1/( I 1'Ot &~- '1> ~40.&-e -e; 4 SfJovJ ~rr cry 'IV &'-f/' toT I(~' ~ 'Z1t..t:SO I S'f'r:.JN.b cNr>>J ~f? 0-b' 1e'r' ~ td-PJ.t!O I 10 .,A.j.AD~ J.M~ ro"B' -perf 717- 1I-ltpo.~ "? \"'~J .-J oN 1 P--t::=-~ t? ( I ~ ~ .,ft'11.J:3.t;.~ "'u v.o W~~~ -.d llN. Ii ~-"'" l~/..-- ~ lOZ. 11- ~ ,~1t? Q!) l"? t\N~~---~ .jONrr-~ 1 ~L.- YtJI It: $I~~~ 0 WMr"U-r ~~ r..:-. r\ _. lb"' Z+" I tel '23 - tt t5?t~ - ...,...... '" '1' "f ..." \ ft; c...oLOM~~ ~~ta. ~ '-2r' fe1r Ie:- 410 I08-AJ 11 ALf1Nt:; ~'*"~ 16-?A<I I ~ I&' ~ 117~ I I SUB TOTAL ~~J&~q.~ TAX - TOTAL :It> ~, 0'1 q .60 . LAN-DE-CON INC. agrees to: Furnish nursery stock of the top quality true to name. To resupply once at no charge all trees, shrubs and evergreens which fail to grow through the first year (365 days) from date of billing. - No warranty claims will be honored if account is not paid within thirty days of date of billing. Any losses due to acts of God or damage after planting are not covered by warranty. LANDSCAPE · DESIGN · CONSTRUCTION .. r ..~ 'I, . . ., . . <L LAN-DE-CON INC. P. O. BOX 308 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 (612) 474.2260 FAX (612) 474.0155 JOB NAME: r\~~ Wet\~ ~Lll) DATE: ItJ-~.qz. ~\.1-/,~ /..AN. M~. LAN~ WCK~ QTY. ITEM S:ZE TYPE TOTAL 14-0 LN. -pf ~ .-J-.. ~ 'T117/w.Yr. . 1tz..~.~ 1DO I ~. '(w. .s?'i7 INS1ALL~ ."Il!: ' I ;;i/k.'" ~ 6f I. ()-?o. db , 4:-6w ~ f'r. 5\'~ 17 \/J ~D M L7 lL-t1 r:JVf:: :1=\ ~. t;vfk F1~ 2, fcl?/tZ> . . 'i I .- I ( ~~ ~C:V.5) I Iv v;io ..=:e. F~ .6t\~ '\u~ MUl.LJ1 0I'et( -y'1'-- I.." v rr.... ,tl.....- - 11 ( ..,~ ~~ ) 'ZI?~~'?f~ tS,?I'Z~ I / II I I I I I - I I SUB TOTAL -1t q OI~.GIO TAX - , TOTAL 1t ~ OI(p.60 LAN-DE-CON INC. agrees to: Furnish nursery stock of the top quality true to name. To resupply once at no charge all trees, shrubs and evergreens which fail to grow"through the first year (365 days) from date of billing. No warranty claims will be honored if account is not paid within thirty days of date of billing. Any losses due to acts of God or damage after planting are not covered by warranty. LANDSCAPE · DESIGN · CONSTRUCTION . . OCT 08 '92 15:01 OSM MPLS, MN P.2 October 8, 1992 O\'\'J~=~ 300 Park Place Center 5175 Way""ata Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55416-1228 612-595-5775 1-800-75~-5775 FAX 595-5773 Mayor and Oty Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Engineers Architect::; Pl<loners Surveyors Re: Church Road Assessments City Project 91-2 OSM Project No. 4680.20 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Staff is currently in the process of compiling the assessment role for the Church Road project. Because some of the issues regarding this project are somewhat complicated, we thought it advisable to discuss some of them prior to the October 26 assessment hearing. The original Feasibility Report was prepared in November, 1990 and identified construction costs of $10~160.00, indirect (soft) costs of $35,770, and right-of-way costs of $39,270 for ~ total of $177,200. Currently, the construction costs are estimated at $105,500, soft costs associated with construction are at about $35,000, and right-oi-way costs and contingencies are estimated at $87,500 for a total of $228,000. Obviously, the total project cost is significantly higher than originally proposed - primarily because of the high cost of obtaining right-of-way. Originally, the stated intent of the residents was for each to donate the required rlght-of-waYJ leaving only the acquisition of the parcel for the cul-de-sac and legal costs to be assessed. This was the premise upon which the Council voted to proceed. U nfortunatelYJ it appears that at least one of the residents involved intends to resist the easement taking, and a quick and easy resolution to the situation does not appear likely. This, we believe, will lead to the increased easement taking costs noted above. The potential increase in assessments is estimated at $3,500 (from $12,800 to $16,300) for each assessable unit. The proposed cost split include two (2) deferred assessments on the cul-de-sac parcel as originally delineated in the Feasibility Report. Keeping in mind that the proposed assessment has to have a direct bearing on the financial benefit to the parcel involved. staff believes the Council should have some alternatives available. One of these alternatives would be to have the City keep the $24,000 purchase price of the cul-de-sac lot, to be recouped upon future development. This would reduce the proposed assessments to about $14,600 each. equill Opportunity emi'loyc:r 116 OCT 08 '92 15:02 OSM MPLS, MN P.3 Mayor and City Council October 8, 1992 Page 2 As was done with Pine Bend, another alternative may be to have the City pick up part of the street construction cost from the road fund or proposed storm sewer utility fund. With the City assuming a 1/3 portion of the street costs (about 550,000), the proposed assessments would be about $12,700 - very close to the original assessment of 512,800. The Council should also be aware that some or all of the affected residents will be receiving Some of the assessment money back in the form of easement payments. Currently, the estimates for easement payments range from $1,000 to $6,400. While . these payments wm have the result of reducing the net assessment, they must be considered separately from the actual assessment roles according to the City Attorney. We have attached a copy of the project map from the original Feasibility Report for your convenience. Please contact me at 595-5695 with any questions. Sincerelys ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~./. .' ..' / -', r' ...:": ..... ".' ,.' .....\... ~'i .-,'."....~ . .' ," .... 4<Z<.... ,," ';'" " .~ /' Joel A. Dresel, P .B.,L.S. City Engineer . enclosure -J ] .J ] ] .J ] ] "] ] ] ] J "J ] ] ] OJ "'.1 CT 08 '92 15:02 OSM MPLS, MN P. . (! 17"'/ l-.loG.J Lor Ol.AJ~.s J "1:\ 0 120 13 / -~,-t#L 14 MAPLE AVE. PROf? CUL DE SAC 15 I _~~L_ -~~. II t. ,0/0 16 10 ./ Q' 00: --~~ 9 17 j . ... - -e-fi+5L IS EASEMENT a R/O/W TO BE ACQUIRED .'" .~." 5i.,... ~ -t. Add.,..('~:s · sk.c.J-J ;A4 pf!.NC""~ .! 19 J - -e-'+1S- 20 24.51 EX. RIO .,j , 021 ft,1 g5 ,/ 70(,,110 ~ 60 (..18.:1 o UNIT . . 3 ;i1D) C. ~ <.J., .... I ~ " . r I "_ . J9i5 J r ~J5f>O 4 I 5 '1) r d 1> 2t 24 / . I I . SCALE : f~ = loe w. 62.nd ST. Orawn 81: R. G. O. Drawing Title EASEMENT AND ASSESSABL UNITS CHURCH ROAD SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA Comm.No. 4680 QS. M.." tI.lesa "',noQ . Dote:' A~i.t.... I... SEPT. 24, ~-."'~-en..__' 1990 -..... ---... 4_. - 1l.a ~. _._ Fi9Jre no. A . . DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 417 North .Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401--1309 o HENNEPIN - - - Phone: (612) 348-6846 FAX: (612) 348-8532 September 16, 1992 To: Municipal Recycling Coordinators Enclosed is the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy effective January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1997 recently adapted by the County Board. This document supersedes the version I had sent to you in August. The only change to the final version is that the mid-year reporting date was moved to July 31 from July 15. We are in the process of revising the grant application and the contract to conform with the new policy. I hope to mail the application to you by October 1 and the contract shortly thereafter. If you have any questions in the meantime, please call. Sincerely, C~~ Carl Michaud Recycling Program Manager Enclosure c: Bob Thomas HENNEPIN COUNTY an ~qual opportunity employ~r .,.-- '- Q') /1D HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING FUNDING POLICY JANUARY 1, 1993, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997 APPROVED BY THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SEPTEMBER 1992 . . HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING FUNDING POLICY I. BACKGROUND Hennepin County has adopted a policy to provide funding support to municipalities for curbside collection of residential recyclables. This policy is the product of input received from municipalities through the Recycling Task Force which reviewed County programs and recommended direction for future program development. . II. POLICY DESCRIPTION The Residential Recycling Funding Policy covers the period from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 1997, and provides for the following: A. Entitlement Grant Municipalities shall receive $1.75 per eligible residential housing unit per month for recycling program expenses including capital and operating costs. Eligible residential housing units are defined as single family through eight- plex residential units, or other residential units with separate entry and where the individual residential unit sets out its own refuse and recycling container, such as a townhome. . B. Incentive Grant A waste reduction and recycling incentive grant fund will be established and will be equal to 5 cents per month per eligible residential housing unit. This incentive fund will be established each year using the total number of households as submitted by each municipality. Any portion of the incentive grant fund not awarded will remain in the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund. This fund will be used to provide grants for the capital and operating costs of new or innovative methods which contribute to the efficiency and effectiveness of residential waste reduction and recycling programs. Also eligible are municipally sponsored programs for multi-housing and dormitories at higher education institutions. 1 The municipal recycling coordinators, as a group, will determine a process to select five municipal representatives to the incentive grant committee. Two County staff will also be on the committee. The committee will develop criteria for incentive grants each year, and will evaluate and select proposals based on these criteria. III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF MUNICIPALITIES A. Aoolication for Funding 1. Entitlement a. Applications for the entitlement must be received by November 1, 1992 and by October 1 for each year thereafter in order to receive entitlement funding for the following year. The application must be accompanied by a city council resolution authorizing submittal of the . application. b. Each municipality applying for entitlement funds must sign an agreement to receive entitlement and incentive payments. 2. Incentive Grants a. Applications for incentive grants are due by March 1, 1993 for the 1993 grant period. Applications must be accompanied by a resolution authorizing submittal of the application. For each year thereafter, applications for incentive grants must be submitted by October 1 in order to qualify for grants for the following year. b. For those cities awarded an incentive grant, an amendment to those cities' entitlement agreements will be prepared in order to ensure that grant funds can be paid to those cities. B. Minimum Program Reauirements . 1. Recvcling Performance Municipalities must recycle 18% of their residential waste stream or the percentage achieved in 1992, whichever is greater. Hennepin County will determine the residential generation upon which this percentage is calculated, unless a municipality is able to measure its residential generation amount. Failure to achieve this percentage goal will result in the requirement that a plan to increase abatement be submitted for Hennepin County approval within 90 days of the submittal of the municipal year-end report.. 2 2. Materials to be Collected At a minimum, the following materials must be collected at curbside: a. Newspaper and advertising supplements; b. Corrugated ca.....dboard; c. Clear, brown and green glass food and beverage containers; d. Metal food and beverage cans; and , e. All plastic bottles with a neck except bottles that previouslycmlCia:i hazardous materials or motor oil. This list may be modified from time to time, with input from municipalities and approval of Hennepin County. . C. Reoorting Reauirements 1. A Semi-Annual and a Final Report must be submitted to the County by July 31 of the grant year and February 15 of the following year, respectively, on forms provided by the County. 2. Incentive grant activities and expenditures must be reported based on requirements developed through the incentive grant process. D. Use of Funds 1. All entitlement funds accepted from the County must be used for waste reduction and recycling capital and operating expenses in the year granted; any unused fund must be returned to the County by April 1 of the following year. . 2. A municipality or township may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees or any other method for that portion of the costs of its recycling program funded by County entitlement. 3. The municipality or township must establish a separate accounting mechanism such as a project number, activity number, cost center or fund that will separate recycling revenues and expenditures from all other municipal activities including solid waste and yard waste activities. 4. All recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues and expenditures are subject to audit. 5. Municipalities that do not contract for curbside recycl"ing services will receive the entitlement specified in II.A provided these funds are credited back to those residents whose participation in curbside recycling programs can be verified. 3 IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HENNEPIN COUNTY A. Entitlement grant payments will be made to a municipality or township. The first entitlement grant payment, amounting to one third of the grant application amount, will be made following the County Board approval of the grant application and execution of the grant agreement. The second and third payments will be made upon receipt of the Semi-Annual and Final Reports. B. The County will convene an incentive grants committee (see II.B) to establish criteria for incentive grant applications. Criteria for the 1993 funding year will be established by January 1, 1993, and by August 1 of the year preceding the funding year, for following periods. C. Hennepin County will continue this funding policy thrQugh December 3.1, 1997, or as long as State and County funds are available to fund this program. The County reserves the right to change any provision of this policy by Board resolution, with 90 days notice. . V. MULTI-HOUSING PROGRAM Hennepin County will continue to support multi-housing recycling through the following: A. The five cent incentive program (II. B) may be used to cover multi-housing and dormitory recycling projects. B. Technical assistance will be provided to support multi-housing recycling programs. . C. Advertising and public education efforts to support multi-housing recycling will be continued. 4 . . , HEMO TO: Richard Young, police Chief James C. Hurm 11~-- October 1, 1992 v~ FROH: DATE: SUBJECT: Complaints about speed on Old Market/Covington Rd. In early september I asked the police Department to make a special effort to be present there during the evening hours. The city Council raised the question at their September 28 meeting. They asked that the police Department presence increase for a while. Please report activity to date and comment on this by October 7 for the October 12 city Council meeting. Thank You ~ 11I SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFElY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 James C. Hurm, City Administ~ator Richard A. Young, Police Chie~~ October 5, 1992 . 6 Old Market/Covington Road Patrol RICHARD A YOUNG Chief of Police To: From: Date: Subject: (612) 474-3261 HBHQRANDUH You memo of October 1, 1992 asks for an activity report on patrol in this area since the request of early September. When the request was made, I was not told a report would be required. I, therefore, merely passed on the request to the officers but did not ask for a report from them on their activities. Without such a report from them I can not make an accurate report to you. Much of the patrol activity would not be recorded by the officers unless specifically asked for in advance. However, I did go back through the daily logs and found the following where the officer had made a specific log entry: . 9-2 1525 - 2245 9-5 1335 - 1400 9-13 2225 - 2245 9-18 1510 - 1530 9-19 1045 - 1110 9-24 1350 - 1420 . 9-25 0831 - 0919 9-25 1340 - 1425 9-26 1718 - 1853 9-29 1700 - 1715 Old market & Waterford - 1 warning Vine Hill & Near Mountain - no contacts Vine Hill & Shady Hills - no contacts Vine Hill & Covington - no contacts Old Market & Muirfield - no contacts Vine Hill & Covington - no contacts Old Market & Muirfield - 1 speed tag Vine Hill & Covington - 2 speed tags Vine Hill & Covington - 3 speed tags Old Market & Waterford - no contacts This is by no means all of the time spent in the area by the officers, merely that which resulted in the officer making a specific log entry. The tags have not all been entered in the computer yet due to the backlog on the office staff. However, I would not expect to find many tags on Old Market Road. The officer's have told me that speeding vehicles sufficiently over the limit to tag are very scarce in this area. I would expect to find more tags on Vine Hill Road because experience has shown there tend to be more violations on that road. There also has been the concern over the 25 MPH limit without the official bike path on portions of Covington. The court has expressed their concern that we do not write tags for the 25 MPH violation until such time as a bike path really exists in those locations. Finally, I repeat that I was not expecting to give a report so I have not been accumulating the data. If you wish me to do so, please let me know and I will make sure the officers report to me their activity in this or any other specific area. Serving South LaJre Minnetonka Communities of Exi:eIsWr, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay . . 10/8/92 CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAINTENANCE BUIlDING REMOVAL SCHEDULE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT Move out all equipment by Sunday, November 15, 1992. Advertise building with contents or for demolition Wednesday, November 11 and Wednesday, November 18, 1992 Open and award bids on Monday, November 23, 1992 at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Shorewood City Hall. If demolition - building to be gone by Wednesday, December 23, 1992. If removed - building to be gone by Tuesday, February 23, 1993. JCH.DZ/al ~) /10 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE CHECKS ISSUED SINCE SEPTEMBER 29. 1992 10057 (G) 10058 10059 (G) 10060 (G) 10061 (G) 10062 (G) 10063 (G) 10064 (G) 10065 (G) 10066 (G) 10067 (G) 10068 (G) 10069 (L) 10070 (L) ~071 (L) 072 (L) 0073 (L) 10074 (L) 10075 (L) 10076 (G) 10077 10078 (G) 10079 (G) 10080 (G) 10081 (G) 10082 (G) 10083 (G) 10084 (G) 10085 (G) 10086 (G) 10087 (G) .0088 (G) 0089 (G) 10090-91 10092 (G) 10093 (G) 10094 (G) 10095 (G) 10096 (G) 10097 (G) 10098 (G) 10099 (G) 10100 (G) 10101 (L) 10102 (L) 10103 (L) 10104 (L) 10105 (L) 10106 (L) 10107 (L) US Postmaster Void Mn Dept of Revenue Harold Dircks The Innovation Groups Mr. Peter Mattson Midwest Asphalt Corp. Cellular Telephone Co. Minnegasco, Inc. Northern States Power Northern States Power US West Communications Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Harry Niemela Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Ryan Properties US Postmaster Void Medcenters Health Plan Medica Choice Group Health Inc. League of Mn cities Mn Mutual Life Commercial Life Ins Co. AFSCME Council 14 Wendy Davis James Hurm Bradley Nielsen Joseph Pazandak Pera Void Fina Fleet Fueling Metro Waste Control Mn State Treasurer Northern States Power Joseph Pazandak Superamerica Us West Communications Waste Management Savage State of Mn/Bookstore Bellboy Corporation Boyd Houser candy/Tobacc Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Weekly News, Inc. Newsletter postage state water surcharge Council meeting taping Administration books Refund for overpay on water bill street supplies Cellular phone airtime utilities street light utilities utilities Telephone svc/advertising Liquor purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Oct rent for store I Liquor and wine purchases Liquor,wine,misc purchases Oct rent for store II 3rd qtr utility billing postage Oct health insurance Oct health insurance Oct health insurance Oct dental insurance Oct disability insurance Oct life insurance Oct Delta dental group 538 section 125 reimbursements Mileage/sec 125 reimbursement section 125 reimbursements section 125 reimbursement Employee addtl life ins. Gasoline purchases sept SAC charges 3rd qtr bldg permit surcharge utilities Mileage Gasoline purchases Telephone services Waste removal 1992 Mn Session Laws Liquor purchases Misc and supplies purchases Liquor,wine,miscpurchases Wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor,wine,misc purchases Advertising TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED -1- AMOUNT 396.99 996.00 210.00 29.95 957.49 406.00 68.26 270.72 1,840.10 903.85 263.28 1,689.99 4,654.79 1,140.21 1,664.00 589.02 796.95 2,400.00 383.76 909.50 4,058.50 1,070.28 403.00 85.50 49.63 224.00 80.67 233.72 239.96 160.00 42.00 195.80 6,237.00 2,402.78 1,703.09 58.80 403.00 162.52 283.00 31. 95 1,480.54 2,289.65 3,562.03 602.17 1,328.30 610.45 240.00 25,761.10 23.048.10 48.809.20 CITY OF SHORE WOOD CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCT 12, 1992 MEETING CHI='C}{j:f VENDOF;' N(~r'iF DI='SCR I PT T ON DEPT. (4r'iOUNT -------- ------------------------- ---_._------------------- -------- _._~-----_.~ ~_z;,?:,-117 -2,7:;-14-0008 r1Ui'" Fil.. DG ,<:'):3. .~,.< ~_z;2,-117-23,-44-0002 f'iUN 1?l..DG 10~:;.~;:,. *** TOTAL FOF,' HFNNFI:;"JHl COUNTY Tf:.'F.A 647. :'';:3 10128 KEN J ~~RCHO T HSURANCI::: PUR EI~iPEE RL Pd"KFT ROHD 10129 KNUTSON SERVICES, INC. SEPT RECYCl.. H.lG 10130 KRUGE-ATR. INC. ~~ T i~ COMPF~FSSOF;' 101:31 LE(4GUE OF MN CITH~S I;.JORKERS COMP INSUF;'Pd..J,CF. I/JORKI:;:F;'S CCWiP T NSLH:.'ANCF ItJO~i~KERS COf1P I NSUF;~()~.lCI::: *** TOTAL FTIF? LEAGUE OF 1"iN CITrE~::: 10132 l..Dr-.J,G i..(~\}-<E TF,'(::)CTOF,'/EqUIP 'I/'FHIC~l..E MAnn SUPPl.. IES 101?:;?) MTDItJEST I?,USINESS PF<'ODl.JCTS OFFICE Pi~ODl..JCTS MUr-J, I::;;L DG 90.'::, . (Il Fi~I:::CYCL. T H 3 ,677 . 1 ( PF;'O,JECTS ::-1, ()93.~ 2''': t11..lN l?l.. DG 17 , :'S 16. Ot: -------- 1.122.0C -------- l,682.0t ......() .,.......t .-)(' . ,('" . .. .<: ,J . \. .J PUR WKS 118.0~ GFr'J, (;(]\/T 207 . :-:;( 20. Ti PL.ll::;L I SH I ['./13 GEN GO\lT :":;00. OC 1013<:,l 1"H'.l SUN PI..Ii~lLICATTCH-.JS 1013.~, 1'1 I Nl"J.ETC)r"J.l.-U~ COUHTRY CL I..JE DEPOSIT-APPRECIATION DNR -------- STRFETS 1 ~ ~?l::.S ~ ~~I( 101?;(, liWL HUEL.l..F.F;' {it SC,lr'J,S, THe:. STm;:ET ~-)I..JPPL.TFS 10:1.:;:;7 r..!OrH i-II:: F;'r',! CDUf'..!Tll::::::::: SEe: S'v'C COI..Ii'...J,CH. l"iEFTHJ,G 1,'nNUTFS cmmeTt. 19.'::'..0t: P(~)~.J,NIr'J.G Cni"WiTS::~~ 1'1TNI..ITES PL(::)Ni'..lIj-,H3 1.58.2 *** TDTp:L. F'OFi~ (.J.OFHHFRN CDI..,iNTTFS SE 3.;:;,~'S.. ?t:;, 10138 OFm, SCi--lFL. [(...J" i'1(;~VFROi"J./(4SS0C (~UG FNG F::EFS-F.:I... DG PFFi'r1 I T i~UG ENCi FEFS....DI:;:'v'FL OP1"il::'I'H r~I...IG i:~t'.H'; H=.FS....m.J, GO.HJ.C1 AUG FI",J.G FFTS-"GFr-.!ERi~1... ()UG Fi'.H'; F.:FFS-PI,.,J S T TF ~~UG FNG F'FF::S....OLD r'iKT F;D (41...IG ENG Fl::ES-CHUF~CH F.'O()[) (~UG Er..J.G FEES-'( IF'T STb!~~,) *** TOTAL. FOR ORR.SCHEI..EN,MAYERON/ 10139 PITNEY-BOWES THC.. POSTAGE MACHIHE RENTAl. PF;OF SER PROJECTS PFW,1EC:TS ~'.~~, ':i:'.~:;~. .j;' ~?'?,~,0.1c 2.764.",) 3f~~3 _ '7~ PROJECTS 2,497..8 SEWER DE 915.9; () ;:0 8()'':) . ();F.:~ l"'iI.Jr'J. i3L DG f;?; '. () 10140 POTTS. KENNFTH N. ()UG/SEPT PROSl::CUT IOi'./ I::-EE P~WF SEf.( ':?;:o (:'>l,~) - (.1 10141 PRECISION COMPUTER SYSTEM COMPUTF:r:;' SUPF?T /F~r",!HANCF1'1T Cm1PI...ITFR SUF'R T /Er".lH(~NCEr'1T C:O,"iPl.lTF: }-,' SI.,IPF?T ./E h!H(4f".J.Cr~ ('1 T FCJF: PF?FC T S T Oi'J. C(WiPUTFF<' S *** TCJT A( 10142 ROCHON CORPORATION P(~YI"iF:r",!T \/OUCHFP it'::. 1 () 1. 4 :'-:' U (..n T ClI:l Fi' E ("fT (~( :3 F Ft'! T cr.:: :3 i..J i"J. T I::: 0 R ['1 S F~ F: \/ r C:: l.:: 10144 \lTS1J'..<:)Ei,l,jFR CU:::t::"H (, :;::;F;i;~L SEWER TV INSPECTION -2- FINANCE 774_7 1;.)(4 TEFi' Dl= ??E:,. 0; SEltJEf:;! DE ??5:,. 01 1 ;. '??4. 7'::, -------- 131.,298_5 CrTY [li:4F: 3dl.. l ~:::EI,IJFH DF <=:,80. (J' CITY OF SHOREWOOD CHl::C:i-< PIPPf~OV(~l. L r ST II--J.C; FOR OCT 12. 1992 MEETING CHECK~ VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT . . lOl()9 (~DVANC[::D GFU~PHICS SV>nEI'1S PRII'.HER SUPPL TF:S 101.10 (~IRSIGf',!AI., INC. EEEPER SERVICES 10111 F:'ARL E. Ar'J.DEF<S[::(I, INC. STREET SIGNS 101.12 APPLIED GRAPHICS ASSOC. NEWSLETTER PRINTING DOG LICENSE CARDS *** TOTAL FOR APPl.. lED GF~APHICS ASS lOll?; ASSOC:T(4Ti:;:D CON:31...Il..T?\NTS WTR TRMT PlNT ENG SVCS GEf'~ GOVT 78.7C 19 ~ .SF TR(4E CON 147.7' COl..l~~C T L 927.6';: GEN GOVT 48.9~ 976.61 8,OOO.OC 2~36 . 0(, 1.011<.1 JEFF }=-<'ETNHAf=-<'T DRA CITY HALL ,JAI'.HTORTAl. SVC rH..IN RLDG 1, 798. 1;; 10115 BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOC. INC OLD MKT RD TRAFFIC STI.JDY -------- 10116 F;ROI/Jr.J.TNG....FI::.RRIS THDU:;. ~~;A TEL I. T TE f;'FI'..jT AI. 10117 i3F~V'(~\I",~ F?OCK PRODI..ICTS, Il".IC. STREET SUPPLIES 10118 BRC El..ECTIONS-MIDWEST REG VOTING MACHINE REPAIR 10119 CHANHASSEN-CITV OF l~ U G (~i",1 T ("i (\ L C Of'.H Fi' 0 l.. J0120 CHASKA PARTS SERVICE VEHICLE M~'HNT SUPPL IES 10121 HARDRIVES, INC. PAYMENT VOUCHER ~7 101. ?? H('::'!POL D D I PCKS COUNCIL. MEETING TAPING 10125 i=F:'FD'-F?ITF C:Oi",ITROLS, INC. DF1"iUF;'f~'(;~GE CH(:::\RGE 338 _ 8:' PM,'KS & STI~~EETS 1~766.'-)(' GEN GCIVT 1?7.8C PFi'OT I f',lS 80? . or. Pl.JB WKS 3w9~ -------- 5?,779.3~ COUNCIL llO_O(. I,i.j(;~TEFi' DE 30" ell: CCii"iPUTE;P t'4 (4 T ~J.T CONTP(~CT ADt"iIN '''';. ("~ t: Oi ,_:. t,.) ~.;1 . COi"jf.:JI..,ITEFi' ["i (\ T i',n COi",ITFi'?-'!CT GFN GOVT .5~:) " ()( COMi~JIJTFR r1AHH CDNTf:;'{~CT r; I NANCF. 607 . O( COr1PI..JTF;:Fi~ i'1(4 TNT C:OHTFi~I~CT PL. (;~NH T [",le; '?:~i.S - Ui. CD1"iPUTEF? MPIII'-.~T C.ONTF.~(~CT PFi'DT INS ?'8S, .. 01. CCihPI...ITFR 1"i(~Tl'--lT C:Or,jTF;'(4CT P(;)IF:KS R( '? ~~~ !~I .~ UI. COf'iPI...ITEF' t"i(~TI".!T COHTr"'(~CT 1/.) A T FF<' rw ~~) 7 ..~) .. OJ COf'1PUTFr.~ f'i(41r--1T CC)HTFi'(~CT SFI,\)Er.~ DF: ':s 7 ?:; .. o( I:: m-=i' F T (,!t\HC I (;~L :::JRODUCTS (~ n .~14.~q UU .,:-: , . 101'24 I=TNr\NCT(;~I. PF~C)DI..lCTS cm~~p_ :* ;~.:*. "I~C)1. f~i.. 10125 GOF:JHER S'[,(:~~TI:;: ()r-~F-C:(;~l..l..;. H~ C)r.IE CAL.1. SEFi~VTC:ES ONE CPli... I. SEF,'\! I CFS' *** TOTAL FOR GOPHER STATF: ONE-CAI.. lOl'?6 HF:'l'--!(JFP T H CC)I..It'H'y' TRE i:4SUE'l=R AI...IG PF? T SCH..jl-:::R E)<PEHS::: 1 ell?7 HFi'nJ.Ep T j"l c::nUi',!T'y TRE (~SURF:r;':~)s- J 17 -':?.?-;-13-003f.; '':>'';''''117 ""'??;,w~5~::,'-"00?;3 76-] 17-?3-14-0088 37-117-23-34-0031 33-117-23-14-0033 l;.,i(~ TER [)i'~ SFI/JEF<1 DE '?o.oo 10.. Oi lO.. Oi i:JCJl... T C:F r) :~~,6 7 ~ .?~- f'1U~,1 Fll. DC) i"'i tH',! FU. DC; r"iUi',1. IJL. DG 1'1 (.if'.1 i3 L. D G i"il..lN 8L. DC ~~l'? ,~ .i.. -I. -? _~~l .. () ',?Ol.. ':;';1 ?:; Sf _ .~.~). 76.4' CITY OF SHOREWOOD CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCT 1. 2, 1992 t"iEET I HG CHECKJ:F VEi'mOR i'H~r1E DESCRIPTION DEPT. Ai"-iOUNT l. 0 145 W/:.)CTJi'.n A FORD j'-IERCUFi'V . VEHICLE J:F30 i"-iAINT PUl=:l /,.IJKS *** 246,077.96 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL *** TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST 294,887.16 -4- ~:8 __ ()':.;: . . CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR OCTOBER 1, 1992 PAYROLL 206612 Void 206613 (G) Barbara Brancel Mayor 187.10 206614 (G) Robert Daugherty Council 138.52 206615 (G) Robert Gagne Council 142.50 206616 (G) Daniel Lewis Council 26.92 206617 (G) Kristi Stover Council 138.52 TOTAL PAYROLL 633.56 . . -5- CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR OCTOBER 6. 1992 PAYROLL 206618 Void 206619 (G) Dee .Allar Election judge 76.18 206620 (G) Lenora Bache Election judge 70.41 206621 (L) Scott Bartlett 11.5 reg hours 66.38 206622 (G) Charles Davis 80.0 reg hours 557.72 206623 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 773.66 206624 (G) Carmen Doughty Election judge 94.65 206625 (G) Denise Douglass-White Electi6n judge 75.03 206626 (G) Jennifer Eklund 5.0 reg hours 27.70 206627 (G) Jeanne Englund Election judge 85.88 206628 (G) Gail Finney Election judge 60.03 206629 (L) Cory Frederick 51.0 reg hours 281. 29 206630 (L) John Fruth 15.0 reg hours 83.96 206631 (G) Suzanne Grahn Election judge 106.67. 206632 (G) Charlotte Hall Election judge 75.03 206633 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 681. 78 206634 (G) Joanne Hermann Election judge 130.22 206635 (G) Norma Hogle Election judge 76.18 206636 (G) Elvera Hoops Election judge 112.21 206637 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,493.60 206638 (L) Brian Jakel 47.0 reg hours 240.28 206639 (G) Dennis Johnson 80.0 reg hours 763.82 206640 (G) Kay Johnson Election judge 73.88 206641 (G) Linda Johnson Election judge 34.63 206642 (G) Lorraine Johnson Election judge 73.88 206643 (L) Martin Jones 17.0 reg hours 68.70 206644 (G) Clifton Jordan Election judge 41. 56 206645 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 629.07 206646 (L) Mark Karsten 48.0 reg hours 239.74 206647 (G) Mary Knopik Election judge 268.27 . 206648 (G) Irene Kronholm Election judge 73.88 206649 (G) Elaine Larson Election judge 73.88 206650 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 793.34 206651 (L) Susan Latterner 37.5 reg hrs-election jdg 256.95 206652 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours 721. 89 206653 (G) Jill Majestic Election judge 75.03 206654 (L) Russell Marron 30.5 reg hours 169.20 206655 (G) Judith McCuskey Election judge 79.65 206656 (G) Karen Miesen Election judge 76.18 206657 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 764.92 206658 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 654.72 206659 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 937.93 206660 (G) JosephPazandak 80.0 reg hours 960.46 206661 (G) Nancy Peterson Election judge 76.18 206662 (G) Jeannine Picha Election judge 73.88 206663 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours 747.45 206664 (G) Pady Flaherty-Regnier Election judge 46.17 206665 (G) Mary Reutiman Election judge 73.88 206666 (L) Brian Roerick 11.5 reg hours 65.07 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE -6- CHECR APPROVAL LISTING FOR OCTOBER 12, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR OCTOBER 6. 1992 PAYROLL 206667 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,040.02 206668 (L) Brian Rosenberger 26.0 reg hours 138.62 206669 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours 410.47 206670 (G) Carmel ita Smith Election judge 72.73 206671 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours 640.53 206672 (L) John Stolley 3.50 reg hours 18.26 206673 (G) Barbara Thibault Election judge 102.51 206674 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 80.0 reg hours 533.63 206675 (G) Carla Wacker Election judge 71. 25 206676 (G) Ralph Wehle 80.0 reg hours 596.85 206677 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 614.00 206678 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1.153.43 . TOTAL GENERAL 16,193.38 TOTAL LIQUOR 3.281.99 TOTAL PAYROLL 19.475.37 . -7-