Loading...
041392 CC Reg AgP CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. AGENDA . 1. 7:00 P.M. - CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1t A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Daugherty Lewis Mayor Brancel Gagne stover C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. city Council Meeting - March 23, 1992 (Att.No.2A-Minutes) 3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Aoorove Items on Consent Aqenda and Adoot Resolutions Therein A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Gambling License - American Legion Post #259 (Att.No.3A-Resolution) B. A Motion to Set a Public Hearing Date - Proposed Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation Dave Hrdlicka 528U st. Albans Bay Road (Att.No.3B-Planner's Memo and Proposed Resolution) C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Declaring the Observance of Arbor Day Applicant: Location: (Att.No.3C-Resolution) D. A Motion to Approve Antenna Installation - S. E. Area Water Tower .. Applicant: Location: Cellular One 5500 Old Market Road (Att.No.3D-Engineer's Memo) E. A Motion to Accept an Agreement for Participation in the Regulatory and Warning sign Replacement Program (Att.No.3E-Engineer's Memo, Resolution and Agreement) COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 13, 1992 Page Two 4. PARK COMMISSION A. Report on Park Commission Meeting April 6, 1992. B. Consideration of a Contract for Park Planning Services (Att.No.4B-Letter and Contract) C. A Motion to Approve a Resolution Approving Plans and Specs and Ordering Advertisement for Bid for Grading and Excavation at Silverwood Park (Att.No.4C-Resolution) D. A Motion to Adopt the Trail Plan on an Interim Basis until it can be Incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program (Att.No.4D-Trail Plan) E. A Motion Authorizing Communication to the City of Chanhassen Regarding Ownership of Cathcart Park (Att.No.4E-Proposed Letter) F. Request to Sell Prepackaged Candy and Gum at Shorewood Parks (Att.No.4F-Resident's Request, Administrator's Memo) 5. PLANNING COMMISSION A. Report on the Planning Commission Meeting. B. C. U.P. Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Sq. Ft. William Bernstein, 5920 Afton Road (Att.No.5B-planner's Report) '. C. Preliminary Plat - Boulder Ridge Estates - Ron Miller (L&M Properties) (Att.No.5C-planner's Memo & Police) D. Simple Subdivision/combination and Partial Street Vacation - Thomas Doherty, 20375 Manor Road and a Portion of Gardendale Road (Att.No.5D-planner's Memorandums) 6. APPROVE RIGHT-OF-WAY - GARDENDALE ROAD Applicant: Location: Randall and Marianne McDaniel Gardendale Road (Att.No.6-Planner's Memo) 7. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL "NOTICE TO REMOVE" Appellant: curtis Hansen Location: 23985 smithtown Road (Att.No.7-planner's Memo) COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 13, 1992 Page Three a. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL"NOTICE TO REMOVE" - Appellant: DuWayne Bakkelund Location: 25155 Academy (Att.No.a-Planner's Memo) 9. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL "NOTICE TO REMOVE" . Appellant: Allen McKinney Location: 4925 Rustic Way (Att.No.9-planner's Memo) 10. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR C NSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY (Att.No.10-Resolution, Bid Tabulation) 16. TTERS FROM THE FLOOR (Att.No.13-Resolution) 11. JUSTMENT IN ARCHTECTURAL FEES FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY (Att.No.11-Administrator's Memo) 12. EAPPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - WATERFORD I - RYAN CONSTRUCTION 20095 STATE HIGHWAY 7 WATERFORD III (Att.No.12-Planner's Memo) 13. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROPRIATING FUNDS FOR GRADING AND EXCAVATION AT SILVERWOOD 14. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 904 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE TABLISHING LOCAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE (Att.No.14-Engineer's Memo, Proposed Ordinance) " 15. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1300.02 RELATING TO LOCAL ITARY SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE (Att.N?15-Proposed Ordinance) 17. AFF REPORTS A. Attorney's ReDort B. Enqineer's ReDort C. Planner's Report COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 13, 1992 Page Four 18. STAFF REPORTS - CONTINUED . D. Administrator's Report . 1. Recycling - Drop Off Center (Att.No.17D-1-Letter) 2. 1992 Metro PainteAeThon (Att.No.17D-2-Letter) 3. Met Council's new Regional Transit Facilities Plan 19. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Mavor Brancel 1. A Resolution Urging Congressman Gerry Sikorski to Co-sponsor and Support H.R. 3560, the Cable Consumer Protection Act of 1991. (Att.No.19A-1-Resolution, LMCCC Request) 2. Resignation of Planning Commission Member Schultz (Att.No.19A-2-Letter) B. Council Member , , 20. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Attac~ment Claims) . JCH.al 4/8/92 . MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1992 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM 3A - The American Legion must apply for and receive a gambling license from the City Council each year. This resolution issues the license thru 1992. , AGENDA ITEM 3B - This action is a resolution establishing 7:15 pm, Monday, May 11, 1992 as the public hearing date and time relating to a proposed vacation of the drainage and utility easements at 5280 st. Albans Bay Road. AGENDA ITEM 3C - We are hopeful that the City may receive a $5,000 grant from the Small Business Administration this year for purchasing and planting trees. This resolution encourages the observance of Arbor Day Friday, April 24, 1992 and the observance of the month of Mayas Arbor month. AGENDA ITEM 3D - A motion would be in order to approve Cellular One changing the type of antenna used on top of the Shorewood water tower. The City Engineer recommends approval from an engineering standpoint. AGENDA ITEM 3E - A resolution is required to participate with the County on a sign replacement program. A short memorandum from the engineer and the agreement itself are included in the packet. The City's 10% share of the program cost, over $1,100, will be taken from the Public Works signage budget. AGENDA ITEM 4B - The three persons we have dealt with at VanDoren Hazard Stallings, Inc have now left the firm. The Park Commission has recommended an agreement with Mark Koegler of Hoisington Group Inc, for park planning services. Mark was our former Park Planner. AGENDA ITEM 4C - The Park commission has reviewed plans and specifications for grading-and excavation at Silverwood Park. A representative from VanDoren Hazard stallings, Inc. will be present to answer any questions. The enclosed resolution approves the plans and specs and authorizes the advertisement for bid. AGENDA ITEM 4D - The Park Commission is recommending that the City Council accept and adopt the Trail Plan on an interim basis until it can be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program. This is a culmination of over one years work by the Park Commission. . ; , j .. I ~ . ..~...... - ,'" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - COUNCIL AGENDA - April 13, 1992 Page Two AGENDA ITEM 4E - In reviewing the various park plans in preparation for an improvement referendum the Park Commission is reviewing options to spending approximately $160,000 in Cathcart Park. The attached two page letter was reviewed by the Park Commission for substance. They recommend that the City Council authorize the city Administrator to send the letter to the' City of Chanhassen requesting their reaction to an option of the City of Chanhassen owning Cathcart Park. AGENDA ITEM 4F - The Park Commission is recommending that the city Council not permit private individuals to sell candy or snacks at City parks. The specific recommendation is to deny the request of Nancy Taylor for her son to sell candy at baseball games. AGENDA ITEM 5B - This is a CUP request at 5920 Afton Road to allow more than 1200 sq. ft. of accessory space. The recommendation is for granting the permit subject to the applicant obtaining a bid from a certified nurserYman for the landscaping and posting a letter of credit or cash escrow of 150% of the bid. AGENDA ITEM 5C - The action here is a motion directing the drafting of findings of fact and a resolution approving the preliminary plat for Boulder Bridge Estates. Enclosed are staff memorandums which identify concern for the extension of a long cul-de-sac to a total of about 1600 feet. Our ordinance allows a cul-de-sac of up to 2000 feet. Staff feels this should be shortened. . AGENDA ITEM 50 - The action required here is a motion directing staff to prepare two resolutions: 1) a resolution of vacation; 2) a simple sUbdivision/combination. This was negotiated at and after a Planning Commission meeting and will be explained fully by the Planner at the Council meeting. ' " . AGENDA ITEM 6 - This is a request to use public r. o. w. for a private drive-way until such time as the road is built as a City street. The location is adjacent to the Doherty property which is the subject of item 50. These two. items are related. Please review the memorandum in the packet for item 6. AGENDA ITEM 7 - This is an appeal of a "Notice to Remove" material from premises at 23985 Smithtown Road. Brad Nielsen will give an updated report at Monday's Council meeting. AGENDA ITEM 8 - This is an appeal of a "Notice to Remove" vehicles and material at 25155 Academy Avenue. This property has been sited in the past for similar offenses. The request is for additional time. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - COUNCIL AGENDA - April 13, 1992 Page Three . AGENDA ITEM 9 - This is an appeal of a "Notice to Remove" vehicles and material at 4925 Rustic Way. This is a repeat offender. Records of previous offenses and actions are enclosed in the packet. AGENDA ITEM 10 - We are very pleased with the amount of the low bid and the number of bidders involved in the bidding process for our Public Works facility. The action would be passage of a resolution accepting the bid and awarding the contract to Rochon Corporation. The packet includes the memorandum from EOS Architecture and an updated budget which shows that there should be funds remaining on completion of the Public Works facility project. AGENDA ITEM 11 - The attached memorandum explains the results of a meeting held recently by the Architects Selection Committee which included Bob Gagne. Our recommendation is that the city council should authorize an increase of $7,064 architectural fees to go to EOS Architecture. In short the two main justifying reasons are: 1) the scope of the facility has increased. It is 34% larger than was originally anticipated; 2) a number of unusual circumstances were involved including coordination of a separate contract for grading and construction of the salt/storage facility, and the inclusion of a retention pond on the site. Action would be a simple motion authorizing an increase in architectural fees by $7,064. This increase is included in the project budget submitted in item 10. AGENDA ITEM 12 This is an informal presentation by Ryan Construction Company on their proposal for Waterford III ~ their peapplication for a comprehensive plan amendment. Attorney Tim Keane has been asked to set the stage for the presentation by explaining the current legal status of the intersection proj ect and give a brief history of Waterford III. A presentation on the proposal will be given. The council' will be asked to give informal reactions to the proposal. AGENDA ITEM 13 This resolution amends the 1992 capital Improvement Budget r~lating to silverwood Park grading and excavation and establishes a budget for that project. AGENDA ITEM 14 - This proposed ordinance would amend Chapter 904 of our code by e~tablishi~g a Local Sanitary Sewer Service Availability Charge {LSAC),-. An attached memorandum from engineer Joel Dresel explains how the LSAC is justified and explains the recommended fee of $1000. . AGENDA ITEM 15 - Is a second ordinance which will be necessary following the passage of item 14, which establishes the LSAC charge of $1000. AGENDA ITEM 17D-1 - Hennepin County has verified that closi~g the recycling center at Shorewood Shopping Center would not affeGi;our 80% County reimbursement. with the contamination at the sit~and the expense of about $100 per month to Public Works of cleaning the site, it is my recommendation that the site be closed. I will present an updated verbal report at the meeting. JCH.al . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 PM I MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Acting Mayor Daugherty. A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acting Mayor Daugherty lead those present in the pledge of allegiance. B. ROLL CALL Present: Acting Mayor Daugherty, Councilmembers Stover, Gagne, and Lewis; Engineer Dresel; Planner Nielsen; Administrator Hurm; and Recording Secretary Grahek Absent: Mayor Brancel C. REVIEW AGENDA , Acting Mayor Daugherty reviewed the Agenda for the current City Council Meeting of March 23, 1~92. Stover moved, Gagne seconded, to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Acting Mayor Daugherty reviewed the minutes from the City Council Meeting of March 9, 1992. Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to approve the Council Minutes of March 9, 1992. SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page two 3. CONSENT AGENDA ORDINANCE NO.252 RESOLUTION NO. 28.92 ORDINANCE NO. 253 Gagne moved, Stover seconded to approve the Consent Agenda, and to adopt the Resolution and Ordinances therein. . A motion to approve permanent appointment - Secretary/Receptionist Beverly Yon Feldt A. A motion to approve the contract for Recording Secretary B. Ordinance No. 252 - "An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Fee Schedule" . C. Resolution No. 28-92 - " A Resolution Establishing Spring Cleanup Fees" D. Ordinance No. 253 - "An Ordinance Amending Shorewood City Code Relating to Special Intoxicating Liquor License for Sunday Sales" E. A motion accepting a Policy to Standardize Monthly Payroll Motion carried unanimously. 4. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1-92 - MAKING VARIOUS APPOINTMENTS A. Consideration of Appointment of City Attorney . Councilmember Gagne expres~ed his qrixed feelings with regard to continuing with the firm of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. and utilizing the services of Tim Keane, as opposed to continuing to use David Sellergren who has moved his practice to Doherty, Rumbel & Butler. He asked for input from the other members of the Council. Councilmember Stover pointed out that the fees charged by David Sellergren when he was at Larkin, Hoffman represented an increase what the City had paid the previous firm. She reminded the Council that there had been attorneys who served the City well in the past, and had billed at a lower rate. Councilmember Lewis asked Administrator Hurm if the fee problems had been discussed with the Larkin, Hoffman firm. SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page three Hurm indicated that they had discussed several items of concern, most specifically: the need for Tim Keane to familiarize himself with all the contracts, the need for him to be available for City business, and the City's concern that the fees were too high. Hurm appraised the Council that the question of double billing had been resolved in the City's favor; that the January and February fees had also been adjusted in favor of the City; that Tim Keane had agreed to a lower hourly rate for all future billings; and to not charge for bringing himself up to speed on the City contracts; and finally, that he felt the staff had better coordinated their efforts in an attempt to decrease the amount of phone time with the law firm. Hurm reminded the Council that they had ceased to invite the attorney to the last few Council meeting where there was a Consent Agenda and a work session. . Action Mayor Daugherty expressed his feeling that the City should not undertake the exhaustive process of searching for another law firm, when we knew Tim Keane and were impressed with his work. He asked that the Council stay with the Larkin, Hoffman firm and have Tim Keane represent the City. Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to re-affirm the contract with Larkin, HofTmaR, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., and to insert the name of Tim Keane as Counsel for the City. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of Official Depository . Councilmember Gagne asked that the Council vote to leave the depository where it is. Stover agreed. .. Council member Lewis s~ated that h~ felt the recap from the staff had indicated that the $500-700 potential savings from -transferring to another was definitely offset by the increased service they were presently receiving. Stover felt there was little advantage in changing banks, and hoped that the City would retain the present bank for 4 or 5 years. Gagne, Daugherty and Lewis agreed. Stover moved, Gagne seconded, to keep the First State Bank of Excelsior as the Official Depository. Motion carried unanimously. Acting Mayor Daugherty asked that a motion be made to accept the Resolution as a whole, with the previously identified insertions. SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page four Stover moved, Lewis seconded, to adopt Resolution 29-92, a Resolution amending Resolution No. 1-92 - Making Various Appointments - with the following insertions: 1. "Official Depositories:" insert First State Bank of Excelsior 2. "City Attorney:" insert Timothy .T. Keane for Larkin. HotTman. Daly & Lind~n. Ltd. . Motion carried unanimously. 5. AD.TOURNREGULAR CIlY COUNCIL MEETING SUB.TECTTO THEAPPROV AL OF CLAIMS . Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to adjourn the regular City Council meeting at 7:20 PM. Motion carried unanimously. GENERAL AND LIOUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NO. 00-00166-02 Checks issued since March 6, 1992 Check No. 8680 - 8753 Liquor General $ 58,077.64 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $ 31:015.42 $ 89,093.06 . Checks for Council approval Check No. 8757 - 8798 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL $103,055.71 $192,148.77 TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL UST CHECK REGISTER FOR MARCH 10, 1992 PAYROLL Check No. 205995 - 206034 . . SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page five Liquor General $ 3,121.62 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $ 14,727.01 $ 17,368.63 RECONVENE Acting Mayor Daugherty reconvened to a Work Session at 7:30 PM. 1. DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Council: Acting Mayor Daugherty, Stover, Gagne and Lewis (Brancel Absent) StatT: Administrator Hurm, Engineer Dresel, City Planner Nielsen, Public Works Director Zdrazil, and Finance Director Rolek Planning Commission: Chairman Benson, Malam and Borkon Park Commission: Chairman Wilson, Lindstrom, Dzurak, and Laberee City Planner Nielsen explained to the group how the PoliCy Plan works, how it is used to make future plans and respond to new developments, and why it is the foundation on which everything else ~s built. He suggested two options for reviewing the plan. Acting Mayor 'Daugherty -requested that the members review the Plan on a page by page basis. Nielsen proceeded to review the five Community Goals as stated in the Policy Plan dated September 1981. He told the members that while objectives and policies may change, goals should be basic and fundamental and tend not to change much with the passage of time. SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page six After some discussion, the members agreed that they were satisfied with the goals, and that they felt they had made some progress as a Community towards achieving the goals. Nielsen then covered the section on Environmental Objectives. He suggested including a separate section on Housing issues. Then he explained the progression of developing a plan, and the desire to avoid specifics at this stage. While the process is flexible, one should be able to take the finished Policy Plan and apply it to each specific situation. Following much discussion by the members with regard to inclusions and to the format of the goals and objectives section, the members agreed that a statement . covering all topes of pollution, (water, soil, visual, noise, etc.) should be included in the next draft. Nielsen next explained the section covering the Land Use Objective noting that while the 1980s placed a heavy emphasis on the use of vacant and undeveloped land, the current level of land development (approximately 80%) may change the position of these Land Use Objectives in favor of a concentration on Transportation and Community Facility Objectives. Heavy discussion followed which centered on th~ trade-off between maintaining an individual identity as the City of Shorewood, and the need to sacrifice some of that uniqueness in an effort to cooperate with the other communities in the lake area. city Administrator Hurm appraised the members of the ongoing efforts to coordinate with other communities beyond-. the 21 areas in which we currently share services. . He suggested the Community challenge itself to continue 'to find new arenas for future cooperation. . , - Additional discussion culIninated in the decision to flag Item #13 which refers to the pursuance of a "sound tax base for the City". This item will be reviewed as the process progresses to ensure it is in line with the other priorities in this area. The next review covered the Transportation Objectives. The members again expressed their interest in modifying the format of the Policy Plan to include a general philosophy, followed by the goals and objectives in each sub-section. Nielsen will attempt to reformat the Plan before the next Work Study Session. SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page seven Following an explanation of how MSA monies can be used for local road construction and the accompanying restriction, the members agreed they wanted to separate the objectives and goals for local transportation within the community, from the objectives for non-local transportation into and out of Shorewood (Le. Highway 7). The next to last section dealt with Community Facilities/Services Objectives. Nielsen described all the components which are covered under this heading. The members identified the ways in which the Plan could better present the goals and objectives. . The decision was made to use the term "suburban" throughout the document in the interest of consiste~cy. The idea to plan Parks for use by multiple communities was raised. The importance of Public safety and timely services was discussed as it relates to shared community services (ambulance, police, fire, etc.). The final discussions addressed the Administrative Objectives. Nielsen mentioned that this Plan was last updated twelve years ago, and that the Administrative Objectives were no being met with this time tabl~. He suggested that it is generally agreed upon practice to look at the plans about every five years. Administrator Hurm felt that along that line, it would be advisable to review the Capital Improvement Diagram and the Executive Summary annually. . Discussion followed with regard to the value of both short term and long term plans as a means of achieving goals, and assessing the progress made toward the objectives. The idea of having an Action Plan and time scale was brought up. The use of a matrix or time line as pArt of the Executive Summary was raised. Nielsen recapped the session and offered to rework the sections with comments, while striving for a better overall sense of format. He mentioned that the Policy Plan section was the next step in the process, and that the Transportation and Community Facilities sections re to be done jointly. Administrator Hurm appraised the Councilmembers that the seconded meeting in April will cover the Capital Improvement Program, and that the Policy Plan is slated for the second meeting in May. . SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 - Page eight 2. ADJOURNMENT OF WORK SESSION Prior to adjournment Gordon Lindstrom mentioned to the members that the Southshore Softball League had donated a check for $ 1,000 to the City. He presented the check to Rolek. . Stover moved, Gagne seconded, to adjourn the work session at 9:42 PM. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Debbie Grahek Recording Secretary (Retyped by SN) , . A~ting Mayor Robert Daugherty ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Chapter 301, provides for the licensing of certain gambling activities in the City; and WHEREAS, said code prescribes certain restrictions concerning eligibility for such licensing and application, whereby the licensee will save the City harmless for all claims arising out of the granting of such license; and WHEREAS, the following applicant has met the eligibility requirement for such license and has agreed to all terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the license. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That a license for the conduct of gambling as specified in the terms and conditions of the license, be issued for a term of one year, from April 13, 1992 to December 31, 1992, to the following applicant: Applicant Name Address 24450 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April, 1992. . American Legion, Post #259 Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3A Dated: April 13, 1992 . CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, James C. Hurm, duly appointed City Administrator/Clerk of the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing,resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Shorewood and is so . recorded in the minutes of a meeting held on the 13th day of April, 1992. James C. Hurm City Administrator/Clerk Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premises Permit Application - Part 1 of 2 FOR BOARD USE ONLY BASE # pp# FEE CHECK INITIALS DATE LG214 (7/29/91 ) Class of premises permit (check one) ~ A ($400) Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles, bingo ~ Renewal Organization base license number ,),;2 <1 Premises permit numberBOO ~q 0' o B ($250) Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles o o C ($200) Bingo only o New 0($150) Raffles only . mlgn;Q~!qn:!:g~!q~:;!!;'g)f!I!::i:i::::::::1::i!::::!:::1:::::::::::1:::::::~:1:1!::::::::::::::!::::::::::::::1:!f:*::::::;:::::::!:::::I::::::1:!::::::::::::f::f1:11f1::!::::!!::::::!:!::::f!:i:::: :::i::!:::j::!::::!!1I!::::::::j:::::::::!::f:::11::::::::::::!j::::l:::::i::11:i:l:::::l::~::::::::::!::::::::j::::::::::::j!l!::!:j:::::1::::::!:::::::::i::~ Name of Organization UItR-E;VC. ~ (2LoFt;.!l POST ;;..f"Cj Business Address of Organization - Street or P. 0 Box (Do not use the address of your gambling manager) o .5/11I 7J 70 vJ b. City State Zip Code ~XCeL.~{olL . N .j..f'33 I Name of chief executive officer (cannot be your gambling manager) /J tL/6 ,iA y !<f.-6;J l3e /L (;. Bingo Occasions If applying for a class A or C permit. fill in days and beginning & ending hours of bingo occasions: No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by your o~anization per week. Day Beginning/Ending Hours Day Beginning/Ending Hours Day Beginning /Ending Hours County ~;UtJG"P/~ Daytime phone number ('/;J.) l( - 39 F.;l. Daytime phone number (,/;).) '10/ f- (, 9 l7 Title C ol'/{/YlAd6€I!- to to to to to to '. . to Ifbingo will not be conducted. check here [Xl ::lali.J)'!ng::~.e.m:!$.~$j::!f.PI.Q:.mi.lgl:::::I:::fl::11:illl:!::ml::El::::I:::::::::j::::i::j::ill:1llfj:l1:::::::f1f::1:11::::;:::::::::I::::1;:I:f1::j::::I::j:j:::::~~j::::::::::M:I:11f:flfl::: :j::::~ll:;:!::::1:1:!I!::I::::11j:l::l:::!1:!:::f::!:::::!:::::1:;::f:f:f:::~j!::::::::::f:l:::f::!:1!~::!:::: Name"of"establishmeiii'where' ii"ambling' Yiiii' 'bEi'OOiiciue~j""""" ...... ...... ........... Street'Address' (dO' not' 'use' a'post'office bof nu ber) . Ce' (!.U -€ Pt:6,..;2..f' ~~ ~rrH{(HJtV I Is the premises located within city limits? 00 Yes D No If no, is township D organized D unorganized D unincorporated City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises is located if outside of city limits I !-Ie-Jli Ai &' P / tV Name and address of legal owner of premises City . CLJ4!.J;;,JCE CLoj:'eP_ P6.5{ ~ 6x c.~I.-.S, 01'_ Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? I):) YES If no, attach the following: · a copy of the lease (form LG202) with terms for at least one year. · a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions, showing what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class 0 applications. ~xe~LS/()/L State I'1Ni D NO Zip Code ....r...r.3 3 I ~l.J'Irt> SMITI-/TOuJp.) RbI Exc€.u(C';)!L fVlI\J. ...r..c33 I ~ Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 GdriBiifigJ_I!H:1~dtiftt:[:Tftr6;:::;i:imaft[::::::[[:::[[I:::::::[:::[::::::::::[:::::::::::::::::::::[:::::::ir::':':::[::::[:::::[[:::::::[:[:::::::::[[::;1:::::::[:::::[::::[:::[[:::[~::::::::::: ::::;::;::::;:::::~:i[~ili::::[ili:[;:[[:m)::::;;::ili;[[:[:[:[[;:::::::::::::::::::;::::;[:::;::: Bank IDe Bank Account Number . tJo/LwES( I5AtJ/c 0 10/ '-( 77 Bank Mess City State .. Zip Code '-II' WA7&/L S7; &XC€.t...5(4~ I'1N, . .J..J33(...........................:. .:::;:::::::.:;:i1:~~i::.~.II:~!!~I:._.~!I.=~::::::::j::~::::;:::~ii:::::::::::::j:!:i:::f::l!l:~;:::::::::::::: ::::::::[.[:!:::::.::I~i,::.::::::::::::::::::::::::~:;'.' .. ..Name :sAll1es L-. Pe7tE!lSd,J .' 30 lAJo obt.Aw;J AO€" ~XCIZLSIOt-, 14,AJ, ..J.J.3.3 ( - &MI/NG- fW;-r ..5AMfI 1'4, l3ei..&a1AN.J ;1..r- ;VoI..:r1l f..LJ..P A-dtE, f 16;111<14 !JAY.' 1"'l,J,.s:r33 , - 11S$7: /f,fCrtt G~g Sltr ~u1borl;:;-;tiOD .1 am the chief executive officerof1ha organization; I hereD1:onsent1lat focal la..,,' 3nforceme~t ~fficers, the .1 assume full responsibilityiar1he1airand mwtul opera- . boardcagents cftte board. c. the commissioner of tion of all activities to be conducted; revel8lllr publicsafsly. or ac::nts of the commissioners, .1 will familiarize myself withtifte laws of Minnesota mayl!lilttthe pr&lliiesto 9r:~~'ice the law. governing lawful gambling and rulesmthei:ICard and BanJERitcordsJll.fmmilti(}D agree, if licensed, to abideD,1hcse laws and rules, The I8rd is authaiZedto ins!=,,:1ct the bank records of the including amendments to them; gam!:ig@ccourt..8fl8Ver ;'\ ~;essary to fulfill .any changes in applicatiorttnformaDon wiD be submitted requiBents of ~gamt" -J rules and law. to the board and local unitwf-govemmantwilhin 10tlays Oatil of the change; and I dectlMhat: .1 understand that failure~mqW'ac:l information .1 havead this aPfcation a;"" ~ all information submitted or providing false or mislMding infDrmatim may JeSuit in to theitard is m.,accurntr. ~;"",j complete; the denial or revocationat~ rlCens&. .all otilerequireaJlfCnnatiu": h "IS been fully disclosed; SignamelCf chiefll8altiv€l o~"';er l>ate !__1):::"::::':'::'::::,,:::~, .:.:::::~~?:t!:t::':;~slfjglig~lImml:i:!:i:i:i:i:::i::::i::::i:::::i:i:::::::::::::::::::::i:::i::::::::::::::::::::::jj:j:i::::::::::i::::::~[j::::::~:~:~il:i:i:i:!::: :iji:l:::i:i:i:iii:iji::jj:~~~:l::::ill::i:~::~r "'::::::::::I~II:~ji:::j:11i:::::i:~:::I:::i:::::i:::i:i:ii . 4.. A coov of the localli'it of oovemment's resolution ao- . 1. T1B::ity *mushiign 1his ar:" -:atian if the gambling prem- provine this aoolicationJPust be attached to this aooHcation. '. . ises.iidlicated wiIlit,c:ity limit 5. If this application is penied bytheJDcal unit of government, 2. TiEounty....AID 1awnr.h1r" must sign this ~pplicatio~ jf it should not be subm_ to tbe ~ !:entrel Soard. the Qlillbling preaisss.is 10(;;: .~: within a township. 3. liBIocal unlpvemmont :' ~y or county) must pass a resoildlD specili:lllV apprm;:'-;: ('Ir denying this application. Township: By signa" below;lIw ~.lSNp aclmowledges that the organization ~Iying far ~ permit within township limits. . ....-- Clty* or eo.y**' City ClICUnty NaIR Townshl ** Township Name " _,.,:\tI. Signaa.Df persclllllCllivig $.r:;'~ ,.' ;;on Signature of person ~ving lPP"tior1 ~ i..'. :~'1" D8Ilt~ Title Dale Received Title """. . Refer!llllht!t instruciills far re:;:.::'-,..: ,',uachments. Mail. GambIIII&ContrcI~ ': C,:: Ro..-t PIa:m !""'-'~'i, 3rd Floor 1711"CDunt). ~k::j. C: Ro....-".N SSJ [::. .:~'J."'\~2) '- -,;: t.. (AeV1l2IMI1) MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . DATE: Brad Nielsen . f) l 7 ~ 1992 FROM: RE: Hrdlicka, Dave - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements FILE NO.: 405 (92.08) Mr. David Hrdlicka plans to add on to his existing home located at 5280 St Alban's Bay Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The house is situated at the rear of the lot, creating a problem with respect to setback requirements. Rather than request a variance, Mr. Hrdlicb proposes to purchase additional property behind his in order to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. . In order to accomplish the division and combination, it is necessary to vacate existing drainage and utility easements along the current property line (see Exhibit B). Although he will dedicate new easements along the new property line, the City must hold a public hearing prior to approving the vacation. : The applicant's solution to his problem is highly recommended. The division/combination is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on 21 April and by the Council on 11 .May. It is therefore recommended that the hearing for the easement vacation be scheduled for 11 May also. A resolution to that effect is attached for your review. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel Dave Hrdlicka Glenn Froberg 3t:> A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore en w c::: t- o rri <0 N -- -- -- ( 45) J:i '" 69 ('33 ) . :.. lao. _...-- /_----ii7 ,- /~1. /<.<1>' , , 10 ( 34) a> .., '" ~3 /.' 39 (2) . In "ICI ~ ;1; '1\kDL--I'f\J .' \ ~6 "'- ~"iC---,",,",1 : Q.A€,l\~26 i Ie. ..... . ~ 1"'- .t:l 5SS. S : ~ .., . r.' .... ...... ."., ...,9 .....os ". ;, ....... :z ).. ~ .... lJ.J l- t!) -' C\ q: .... 0 Z ::lo <{ -I- QlLI <:l:Z D:lLI Z"'" Q o~ "'{"{ lLI CJ I/) C\UJ 1aJ~ 0 WI./) C!l Q. I./)"{ ~1IJ C> ~lu ~cQ tl:: ~). <{c::l ll.. D:I- Q..I- 0..... '" ILl <0-1 ct)Z I- 1lI- llJlIJ ....1- ~ <l;;:) I-~ U ~Q "1:lJJ Q ~I./) Z oz Q'<l:: ~"'l: ~lJJ ~ ~::1~. I '..I_I- ........... ':':":.- ..'...' ........... . ~ & >... cti. :g !.D' ~ --------- .-' ....:... ....... '...... 0/''35/ ~ZL ~~ LU -J "C tJ f.r) s~. ~~ ~~C) ~\, <0 Q~~ ~ r -",r\ j-v~ BB '€Efi UO!t!PPI1' I I I I I ~I ~I lLI *1 >-1 SI ~I ~I ~ I N 1.0 u) N .... . , -., .... :-:...:' .'" -.. : ..- /::.- ----- [I] ~,., J ~ ~ <::> I I I ....' . ...' " .' ......:..... :::~:. .....: ." :.'" :..'..... .. Ul :z: o H E-< a.. H Q:: U Ul W o o W Ul o a.. o Q:: a.. W+lWIllUl C .c+l C....+lO.... QlO UlO :1: +lQl Cn:lCQl -O~CC .... -.-4 Co'.-4'.-4 OUl :E:~ Ql C Ql '" Ql,C ->0 Ql +I +I >o~ .c>< +I'" +lQlOCQl +I::l+l +1>0 OUl n:l~ tJ'lU Ql ~"'C :J CoQl..-4C +I 'tl '.-4 +I '\:IUI"'CoUl QlQlOQlO '\:I:J 0 Cl'l "',COC O+lIllQlQl , O::l :1:.cC QlO - +10 "'UlUl - '.-4 QlUl....UI QlOl+lQlOC .c.cn:l~ Ql +I +I +I +I >0 +I Ul-.-4~>< O....WE-<"'Ql +10 Ql >0.... +I >0 tJ'l>On:lOUl~ C ~ III Ql '" ..-4 '" "':J Ql '\:IQlUln:l .c ",.cC"'+I+I 0+1 III +I Ql::l O::l..QUlQlO OO~'.-4""Ul III UI < tJ'l WOUl -tJ'l.Q::ltl+l C C +I ...-4 O..-4UlQl..... -.-4 >0 ,C M '\:I +I~ -+I C '.-4 ~ '\:I1ll '\:1+1 ....C '\:I"'~OIllUl <1ll0 Ql CoOQl.c+l '" ~O+llll 0+1 1Il..-4..-4 +I CIll ....:JUl n:l.c -.... W :E:+lNO~ Ql>O C+I+lQl~1ll o CoO.c~1Il Ul Ql ~ +I Ill. CoO "'UI l'l><....CIllC OW 0,.-4 Colli .c ..Q E-< 'Ql'\:lQl~ IllC"'C< - +1..-4 0,.-4 ~O~O~ . Ul Ql +I ~W>O"'n:lUl OC~ o C "'........ - ~'.-4QlOO~ 1Il:E:+I < UI '\:I >O~ - .QlC~O ~N>O:JIll"'O Ql +I,C Ql~ OUlC+lQl+l1Il "'+I::l"'~UI III 0 0 0'.-4 III . a..~UC""QlN ~ l ~ ro: C- cc >0 +I C ::l o U C -.-4 Co Ql C C Ql :1: Ql ,C +I C '.-4 ~ '\:I '" o o Ql '" " , .i . .... o '\:I C n:l Ql ~ -.-4 .... - .... o Ql '" Ql ,C +I +I III ~ Co '\:I Ql . ~ ( C o +- l ~ ~ 't: .... o Q) '" Q) .:....;,1.. Exhibit B PROPOSED DIVISION/COMBINA TION ~ . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR V ACA TION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS The City Council of the City of Shorewood does resolve: That on the 11th day of May, 1992, at 7:15 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers at the City Hall, the Council will hear all interested parties upon the question of vacation of drainage and utility easements in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: "Part of Lot 2, Block 1, ST. ALBANS BAY ESTATES That part of the existing drainage and utility easement lying over, under and across the westerly 10.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, ST. ALBANS BAY ESTATES which lies southerly of "Line A" described below and northerly of "Line B" described below: Line A A line parallel with and 10.00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, ST. ALBANS BAY ESTATES and its southwesterly extens~on. Line B fI A line parallel with and 10.00 feet northerly of the most southerly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, ST. ALBANS BAY ESTATES and its westerly extension. and; Part of Lot 2, Block 1, THOMPSON MANOR ADDITION That part of the existing drainage and utility easement lying over, under and across the easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, THOMPSON MANOR ADDITION which lies southerly of "Line A" described below and northerly of "Line B" described below: Line A A line parallel with and 10.00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 2, . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OBSERVANCE OF ARBOR DAY TO BE APRIL 24, 1992, AND ARBOR MONTH TO BE MAY, 1992 WHEREAS, trees use up excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and turn it into life-giving oxygen; and WHEREAS, trees helps conserve energy; that is, three properly planted trees around a home can cut air conditioning bills by ten to fifteen percent; and WHEREAS, trees turn urban "heat islands" into cool and comfortable "oasis", making the concrete jungle liveable for all of us; and WHEREAS, Arne H. Carlson, Governor of the State of Minnesota, has proclaimed Friday, April 24, 1992 to be Arbor Day and the month of May, 1992 to be Arbor Month; and WHEREAS, in said proclamation the Governor urges all citizens of Minnesota to become more aware of the importance of trees to their well-being, and to plant, nurture, protect and wisely use Minnesota's great treasure of trees. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Shor~wood City Council that the citizens of Shorewood are encouraged to observe Friday, April 24, 1992 as Arbor Day and the month of May, 1992 to be Arbor Month by planting a tree and thereby hoping to ensure a green Shorewood and Minnesota in decades to come. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA this 13th day of April, 1992. Barbara~. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3~ Orr SChelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 202 t East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors April 2, 1992 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mayor and Council Members . Re: Cellular One Antenna Replacement OSM Comm. No. 4490.00 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Cellular One has again asked the City for approval in changing the type of antenna used on the top of the Shorewood water tower. The Planning Department has requested that we review the engineering aspects of this proposed change. According to data supplied by Cellular One, the proposed antenna is lighter, shorter, and imparts a lower bending force on the mounting bracket. Based on this information, we recommend approval of the change from an engineering standpoint. The actual switch should be done by licensed personnel, and signed off by a certified inspector supplied by Cellular One. All entry to the tower must be coordinated with the Public Works Department. . Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-Mi\ YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. /'. p..../aU/' , .,. ,,' , " / Joel A Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer cc: Brad Nielsen, City Planner Don Zdrazil, Public Works Director 3D Equal Opportunity Employer April 7, 1992 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis. MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Agreement for Participation in the Sign Replacement Program Dear Mayor and Council Members: . Attached please find a copy of the transmittal letter and agreement with Hennepin for the referenced project. The agreement includes a letter of intent to participate signed by the City in 1986, and an estimated cost summary. The Specifications referenced in the agreement are filed at City Hall. Mr. Keane is reviewing this agreement with regard to legal form. We have reviewed the specifications for this project from an engineering standpoint. These specifications include provisions for the removal of 20 signs, the installation of 170 signs, and the replacement of 65 signs in Shorewood. The main intent of this project is to bring the signage in the City into conformance with the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The total estimated cost of the Shorewood portion of tqe project is $11,630.58. Of this amount, ten percent (10%) is to be paid by the City. Therefore, the estimated cost to the City is $1,163.06. The project is scheduled for later this summer. . Should the Council wish to proceed with the project, two signed copies of the agreement along with two copies of the resolution approving of the agreement will need to be sent back to Hennepin County. Please do not hesitate to call me at 378-6370 with any questions. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, ~C. /J" /./7 /,./ J'/" //".. /' C. .. ,- ':/<'/\.- -r Joel A Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer 3E Equal Opportunity Employer RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the city of Shorewood is desirous of bringing the traffic control devices on the streets and roads located within its City limits into conformance with Minnesota standards through a County-wide signed proj ect administered by the Hennepin County Engineer; and ~ WHEREAS, the City has previously entered into an intent to participate with Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, plans and specifications have now been prepared by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Federal funds are now available for 90% of the sign replacement program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Shorewood agrees to enter into an agreement for participation in the regulatory and warning sign replacement as developed by the County of Hennepin and attached hereto. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th ~ day of April, 1992. . ~ Mayor Barbara Brancel ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: (612) 930-2500 FAX (612) 930-2513 TDD: (612) 930-2696 .)l}.dq~f{6 . li~ February 26, 1992 HENNEPIN Mr. Laurence Whittaker City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 . AGREEMENT NO. PW 15-46-91 HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY PROGRAM FOR NON-FEDERAL AID LOCAL ROADS COUNTY PROJECTS 9105 AND 9106 Dear Mr. Whittaker: . Submitted for approval are two copies of the above referenced agreement and one copy each of the two contract proposals for furnishing and installing the signs. If the agreement is satisfactory, please have both copies signed by the appropriate City officials and return them to this office. Also, please return two certified copies of a resolution authorizing these officials to sign the agreement. Upon completion of the remaining signatures by County officials, we will send you one fully executed copy for your tiles. We will be initiating the bid letting process in early March and anticipate opening bids in late March or early April. The program guidelines require Mn/DOT to review the bids and concur in the contract award. This process will require additional time and therefore, we do not anticipate the actual sign installation to begin until July or August of this year. ' Installations should be completed by this fall. If you have any questionscongerning:the agreement or the proposals, please call Harlan Hanson' at 930-2530.. . Sincerely, ~~~ ~Bruce M. Polaczyk, P.E. Design Administrative Engineer BCC:mak Enclosure cc: Mr. Donald Zdrazil Director of Public Works HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 County project No. 9105 & 9106 City of Shorewood County of Hennepin AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of , 19 by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Shorewood, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: . WHEREAS, Under the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1973, one of the objectives set forth by the United States Department of Transportation is the conformance of all traffic control devices to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MMUTCD) in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Funds are available through the Federal Highway Administration for 90% of the eligible costs for inventorying the existing signs and replacing, removing or installing regulatory and warning signs/devices authorized and approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and . WHEREAS, The City has previously signed.a letter of INTENT TO PARTICIPATE with the Minnesota Department of Transportation in. the HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY PROGRAM for the correction of regulatQry and warning sign deficiencies on non-Federal Aid local roads. A copy of said signed letfer of intent (marked Exhibit "A") is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested that for the sake of consistency and cost-efficiency that townships and small cities within the same county band together for a single project under the administration of the county engineer; and WHEREAS, The City is desirous of bringing the traffic control devices on streets and roads located within its geographical limits into conformance with -1- ~ Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 Minnesota Standards through a county-wide signing project administered by the Hennepin County Engineer; and WHEREAS, The County and its agents have completed the required sign/device inventory; the City has approved said inventory; and the Minnesota Department of Transportation has authorized the County to proceed with the furnish/install phase of said project; and. WHEREAS, The County Engineer has heretofore prepared an engineer's estimate of quantities and unit prices of material and labor for the above described project and an estimate of the total cost for contract work in the sum of One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred Forty One Doll ars and Forty Three Cents ($116,241. 43). , A copy . of said estimate (marked Exhibit "8") is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of M.S. SEC. 162.17, Subd. 2 and SEC. 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: I The County will administer said county-wide signing project through two separate competitively bid construction contracts. One contract shall provide for " the furnishing of the signing materials, hereinafter known as County Project No. 9105. A second contract will provide for the installation of said furnished , .. materials, hereinafter known ~s Eounty Project No. 9106. . Hereinafter the term "Project" will be used to designate the sign replacement project as a whole and will incorporate both County Project No. 9105 and County Project No. 9106. II The City, by executing this agreement, approves the plans. and specifications prepared by the County and its agents for said project. Said plans and specifications are made a part hereof by this reference. -2- oW< Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 III The County will advertise for bids for the work and construction of the aforesaid contracts, receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisements and enter into contracts with the successful bidders at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidders, according to law in such case provided for counties. The contracts will be in form and will include said plans and specifications. IV The County will administer the contracts and inspect the construction of the contract work contemplated herewith. However, the City shall cooperate with the County Engineer and his staff at their request to the extent necessary, but will ~ have no responsibility for the supervision of the work. V The City agrees that the County may make changes in the plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the City that the County may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the County's contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the project. Said changes may result in an increase or decrease to the City cost participation estimated herein. ~ " _VI The City shall reimburse~ the County for its share of the inventory, materials and installation costs for said project and the total final cost shall be apportioned as set forth in the Division of Cost Summary in said Exhibit "8" attached hereto. It is further agreed that the Engineer's Estimate referred to on Page 2 of this agreement is an estimate of the costs for the contract work on said project and that the unit prices set forth in the contracts with the successful bidders and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer shall govern in computing the total final costs for apportioning the costs of said project according to the provisions of this paragraph. -3- ~ Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 VII Upon completion of the project and approval by the Minnesota Department of Transportation of the final measurement of the actual quantities, the County will submit to the City the County Engineer's Final Estimate for the project showing the City's final share in the inventory, materials and installation costs for the project. VIII The City shall remit the total payment in full to the County within thirty (30) days after receipt of the County Engineer's Final Estimate. IX The County Engineer will prepare monthly progress reports as provided in the specifications. A copy of these reports will be furnished to the City upon request. . X All records kept by the City and the County with respect to this project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of eac~ party hereto. XI It is understood and agreed that upon completion of the project, the City agrees to maintain in a satisfactory condition all signs placed within its geographical limits under this agreement. Said maintenance,shall be the sole cost . of the City. ,'XII The City further understands and agrees that all signs and devices removed by the County's Contractor as a part of said project are not the property of the City and will not be returned to it. All signs and devices removed shall be disposed of by the County's Contractor in accordance with Minnesota Department of Transportation's HAZARD ELIMINATION SAFETY PROGRAM regulations. XIII It is further agreed that each party to this agreement shall not be responsible or liable to the other or to any other person whomsoever for any claims, damages, demands, judgements, fines, penalties, expenses, actions, or causes of actions of -4- ~ Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 any kind or character arlslng out of or by reason of the negligent performance of any work or part hereof by the other as provided herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein. . XIV It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the state of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. . Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered.employees of the City, and that any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the state of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a . consequence of any act or omission on the par~of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility Of the Cit~. XV The provisions of M. S. 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this agreement as though fully set forth herein. -5- #d.V /1 .' Agreement No. PW 15-46-91 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF SHOREWOOO (~eal) By: Mayor Date: And: Manager Date: . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: Clerk of the County Board By: Chairman of its County Board Date: Date: Upon proper execution, this agreement will e legally valid and bindin . And: . Associate County Administrator and County Engineer . By: Assist~t County Date: / - I 0- O;~ Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Approved as to execution By: Assistant County Attorney Date: By: Director, Department of Public Works Date: -6- ~ kECtlvED APR 2 ~ INTENT TO PARTICIPATE -I H~ ENGR. WHEREAS, under the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1973, one of the objectives set forth by the Department of Transportation is the conformance of all traffic control devices to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MMUTCD); and WHEREAS, funds are available through the Federal Highway Administration for the installation of regulatory and warning signs/devices; and . WHEREAS" --_rh~_~i~_~~_~~~~~~~~~____________________________ -( t"Ott1"t't..,..,- -Mttn-i ri -p-e-i-i~ -or- -=Fow1 t'3t--ri-p-) -__i~_th~_~~~~SL_~~_~~n_n_~~n_________________________ -i -rr-:1:tte- -C -ot.lT'1"t:--r-o-f is desirous of bringing the traffic control devices on streets and roads located within its geographical limits into conformance with Minnesota standards; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED THAT: 1. The Participant will comply with the conditions set forth in the Project Description. The-Participant will remove, replace or install all regulatory and warning signs, delineators and object markers necessary to comply with Minnesota standards (MMUTCD) as determined through an approved inventory of inplace non-electrical traffic control devices. . 2. The State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (MnDOT), will administer'the program, and will be responsible for do~umenfation requirements as specified by the Federal Highway Administration. Reimbursement (90% of the eligible tctal costs) will be based on approval of the field inspection, and the materials certification, and satisfactory review of claims documents. The Participant will be responsible for the remaining 10% of the eligible total costs. ~. The Participant agrees to maintain all such material installations in satisfactory condition. 4. The U.S. Department of Transportation Regulations on Non- Discrimination are to be complied with by the Participant. Refer to Appendi:,: A, "Nondiscrimination Regulations" and "Disadvantaged BLlsiness Enterprise Policy". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>eQQ!i~~~iQQL E~g~ 11 f Page 10 Henn. Co. Agrmt. No. PW 15-46-91 Exhibit "A"; Sheet 1 of2 . . APPLICATION We have reviewed the Project Description and the Intent to Participate. We intend to participate in the Hazard Elimination Safety Program for local roads. It is understood that reimbursement will be 90% of the total eligible costs attributed to a comprehensive sign/device inventory*, materials and installation. Although no submittal deadline is indicated, we understand that the funds are limited and available on 'a' '''First Come, First Served" basis. <* Those counties and cities who previously received Federal Aid for sign inventories are not eligible for re-inventory reimbursement under this program.) Sign/device inventory will be conducted by: ~i~~l~ ~~~QQQ~~ . COUNTY ENGINEER or CONTRACT Furnish/install phase will be conducted by: ~i~~l~ ~~~QQQ~~ COUNTY ENGINEER or CONTRACT or OTHER _~~~y_~~~~~__ specify We understand that the sign/device inventory will not begin until we receive authorization from ~nDOT to proceed. Instructions for the inventory phase will accompany the authorization to proceed. Upon approval of the inventory, the project manager may proceed with the project~ .. . We understand that reimbursemeni is contingent on approval the field inspection, the materials certification and satisfactory revie~ o~ clai~~ documents. of Estimated mileage to be inventoried:_2Q~__________ ________ Estimated inventory start date :_~~~~~_~QL_~~~~-------- City of Shorewood _________ --------------------------------------------------- Name,O~C~l tV. Municipality or Township ~ __ _::._-CTt~j}1J.MiLlCJJ:m~______________@r..il_Q~_15l~6 Off i ci ' gnatL\re Date Sl gned 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood MN,_52ll~-_ Add~;~~---- --------------------city------------- zip Code ~~il ~b~ lQ~~Q~ ~Q E~~~i~iQ2~~ ~QQ ~b~ eQQli~2~iQQ ~Q: Nancy Mahle, Manager , 309 Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 Page 11 Henn. Co. Agrmt. No. PW 15-46-91 Exhibit "A"; Sheet 2 of 2 e q~ E~ ~ i!~ ~ ~n~; _nn n IH~I:~~~ I! I! i ~I: _"" . I !i~ ~ n_ I ! ~ ; ~ ~ ~ " : · " : ~ - · ; ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ · ~ ~ s i ~ <II H~ .!!!. 1; ~ s ~ ~ e ~ :e ~ '" 1; ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ . . II! I ~ ----- ..., , . .....- ......- ]! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; : i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ JO' ;: .... ... ... ... .... .... ... ... ... ... 8 8 ... 0 ~ ::; : ~ S g ~ : = = : ~ ; ~ = ~ = g ~ : = ~ ~ S ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ E ~ = ~ : g a o ~ ~ .. N .. .. ~ N ~ ~ . N N " ~ " .. .... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... .. .nNN. ... ..; ,.. ... -.... ..; o ... .... co .... ... ... ... .... .... .... ... ItI ... ... ... o o .. ... ... ... o ... .. N N N \G ., N ,N .. N .... ,., .. ... .... .... ... -. ... N ... ... ... .... ... ... ... '" 0 .... ... ... ,.... .... \D co ,.... ... ~ " Q '" .... 'Ill' '" N co .... ~ ..,. N \0 .... roo N .... ...... ... ... 0\ ", . .. N ... ... ,., ... ; = . ~ " = n . . = N ~ ~ N = N ~ = - : J= f""..,......... f'I"I a:t,..,,...;::,., eft.... '" '" 11\'" to'" ~~ ~ ~ eft ~ '" eft 0\ \D ~ \D a ,.., .... \D \D N .... .... ~ a:t .. ~ ~ : g ~ S ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ : ~ N N '" co .... ~ \D 0 Q"" 0,..,........ 0 N ~ · .. Q = ~ ~ ~ ~ N N _ ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ ~ = -- ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; : ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ = = : ~ 0 '" N '" 0 ~ N 0 \D '" ~ N N 11\ ,.., ~ 0 ,., ,... 0 ,., .... ~ ,.... '" 0\ a:t ,., '" 'Ill' .. .... ~ 0 \D .. co co '" \D M 11\ .... N .. co '" ...... N.... N", co N 'Ill' .... Q N 11\ M ........ ,.,.... ..;......: ... co ... .,.; ... ,.. ... ~ h I ~ ~ I I ! ~ I i I I ~ ; I I ~ a ~ ~ ~ I ~ : ! ; I i I I Henn. Co. Agrmt. No. PW 15-46-91 Exhibit "8" Sheet 1 of 1 ~* !HI G IT Hoisington Group Inc. LAND USE CONSULTANTS ,.. 2 7 S92 March 26, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Contract for Park Planner Dear Mr. Hurm: . As a follow-up to our telephone conversation yesterday, I have prepared the enclosed agreement for professional park planning services for the City of Shorewood. Hoisington Group Inc. (HGI) will have prime contract responsibility for all park planning and design activities. We will utilize a subconsultant to provide necessary engineering participation in park projects. Bruce Chamberlain and I look forward to working with you, the Park Commission and the City Council on the continued improvement and development of Shorewood's park system. I am planning to be present at the Park Commission meeting on April 6, 1992. If you have any questions prior to that time, please feel free to contact me. . Sincerely, ~~~ ~ R. Mark Koegler, RLA Vice President RMK:dbm Enclosure 7401 Metro Blvd.' Suite 340. Minneapolis, MN 55439. (612) 835-9960 Li8 . . MEMO TO: Park Commission FROM: DATE: James C. Hurm, City Administrator March 27, 1992 r~ RE: Park Planning Service - April 6, Item #8 In the last months our Park Planning firm, Van Doren, Hazard, Stallings, Inc. has lost all three of the staff we have dealt with. Mark Koegler went with the Hoisington Group, Inc. Scott Harri has joined another firm. Now, as of April 1, Bruce Chamberlain will be joining Mark Koegler's firm. Although I have not talked yet with anyone from VHS, I understand they no longer have park planners on staff. I have taken the liberty to ask Mark Koegler to redo and resubmit his proposal from several months back which was put on hold (attached). He will attend the April 6 pleeting to discuss this with you. If the Commission recommends this change and the CounCil approves it April 13, he would attend the "April 14 meeting which is shaping up to be a Referendum planning meeting - Bob Lambert from the City of Eden Prairie can attend that night to discuss their recent successful Park Referendum. IHI en IT Hoisington Group Inc. LAND USE CONSULTANTS March 26, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm, City Administrator Members of the Shorewood Park Commission City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . Re: Consulting Park Planning Services Dear Mr. Hurm: This Contract Proposal outlines a Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and other elements which together constitute an agreement between the CITY OF SHOREWOOD, hereinafter referred to as the CITY and HOISINGTON GROUP INC., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT for ongoing park planning consulting services. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: A. SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES . The CONSULTANT shall perform the services. generally outlined below: 1. The CONSULTANt shall act:. as the designated Park Planner for the City of Shorewood. As Park Planner, the CONSULTANT shall provide professional administrative, planning and design services pertaining to the. continued development of the Shorewood park system and shall perform related work as assigned. All work shall be authorized by the Shorewood City Administrator or other qualified CITY staff. 2. The CONSULTANT shall attend all required Park Commission and City Council meetings necessary for the review of matters related to park and recreation projects and issues. 7401 Metro Blvd. . Suite 340. Minneapolis, MN 55439. (612) 835-9960 Contract for Services March 26, 1992 Page 2 3. As requested by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall meet with members of the Shorewood Staff, residents and other applicable parties for the discussion and review of matters related to park and recreation projects and issues. 4. The CONSULTANT shall act as the Project Manager in the design and implementation of all park and recreation projects. Design includes but is not limited to the preparation of plans and specifications for improvement projects, preparation of advertisements for bid, bid analysis, and verification of contractor references. . The CONSULTANT shall provide construction observation services during project implementation. Services will include but not be limited to on-site observation whether full time or periodic, administrative processing of contractor pay requests, processing of bonding write-down requests and warranty verification. B. SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services are not included within the Scope of Basic Services but are available upon the authorization by the CITY: 1. Additional work requested and authorized by the CITY which is . not otherwise provided fo'i- under this Agreement. 2. Retention of subcontractors necessary for any aspect of park and recreation projects. ~ The use .of any and all subcontractors shall be authorized by the CITY. C. FEES FOR PROFESSIQ~AL SERVICES 1. Fees for the CONSULTANT'S Basic Services described in Paragraph A shall be on an hourly basis in accordance with the Current Hourly Rate Schedule included herein. Incidental expenses including transportation in connection with park and recreation planning services, printing and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred shall be billed at actual cost. Contract for Services March 26, 1992 Page 3 Current Hourly Rate Schedule: Princi pal......................................................... $ 7 51 h r Professional 1.................................................50 I h r Professional II ........................................3 5 - 4 0 I h r Technician........................................................ 3 0 I h r Secretarial.... ............. ...... ............................ ..... 3 21 h r . Incidental Expenses: Mileage.............................................................. 27 if, I mi 1 e Outside Printing ............................................Actual Cost Diazo Printing ................................ ............. ....Actual Cost 2. Fees for the CONSULTANT'S Additional Services described in Paragraph B shall be based on the Current Hourly Rate Schedule plus Incidental Expenses. In the case of subcontracted services, fees will be based on actual cost. 3. For projects involving design and design implementation, the hourly fee arrangement described above can be replaced by a negotiated fee based on a percentage' of the actual construction cost including the cost of any add or deduct bid alternates. D. TIME OF PERFORMANCE . The services of the CONSULTANT shall begin upon delivery of an executed copy of this agreement to the CONSULTANT. This agreement shall remaih in effect until terminated in accordance with the provisions contained in Paragraph F. E. PAYMENT TERMS The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULT ANT for services rendered as follows: 1. The CITY will be invoiced on a monthly basis In accordance with the amount of work completed. 2. Payments are due and payable within 30 days of the InVOICe date. . . Contract for Services March 26. 1992 Page 4 F. TERMINATION. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS G. 1. Termination may be accomplished at any time by written notice thirty (30) days prior to termination. This shall not relieve the CITY of its obligation to pay for the full value of the services performed to the date of termination. 2. The CITY and the CONSULTANT each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. 3. Neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. AUTHORIZATION In WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement for Professional Services, This day of , 1992. CITY OF SHOREWOOD Shorewood, Minnesota In presence of: HOISINGTON GROUP INC. Edina, Minnesota In presence of: ~~ld' R. Mark Koegler, RLA Vice President RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR GRADING AND EXCAVATION AT SILVERWOOD PARK WHEREAS, the firm of VanDoren Hazard stallings Inc. under contract wi th the ci ty Council has prepared plans and specifications for grading and excavation at Silverwood Park; and WHEREAS, VanDoren Hazard stallings Inc. has presented such plan~ and specifications to the City Council for approval; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood Park Commission has reviewed and recommended acceptance of said plans and specifications. '. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That such plans and specifications, dated April 13, 1992 are hereby approved. . 2. That the City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and in "Construction Bulletin" an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for one day, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the ,Clerk until 10:00 am, on May 1, 1992, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the city Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:00 pm, on May 11, 1992 in the Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and'filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond o~ certified check payable to the Clerk for five per cent (5%) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator I/~ 1 ] j j ] - ] -J - j I ~] ~1 -, .r; ~. .' ..:.. t~. ,",' -~ ,~.;- .~~ , ~~ ;;~~ ~~~ MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 Q rti fl April 14, 1992 . Mr. Don Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Ashworth, The Shorewood Park Commission is working on a Park and Trai 1. Capital Improvement Program to be largely funded by the sale of bonds resul ting from a proposed referendum election. Par}c dedication fees, as well as donations from civic groups and sports organizations will also be utilized. . The entrance to Freeman Park, our 61 acre Community Park, is located just across Highway 7 from Dogwood Avenue in Chanhassen. At this point six ballfields exist at Freeman. Our Capital Improvement Program calls for over $700,000 in improvements at Freeman over the next-xew years~. It will be a fine facility the residents of Shorewood and Chanhassen will be enjoying for many years to come. One of our four neighborhood parks, Cathcart Park is actually located in Chanhassen,about 2,600 feet west of Freeman Park. This 4.8 acre parcel of land was sold to Shorewood by Minnewashta Church nearly 20 years ago and developed as a park long before Freeman Park existed. As time has passed the make-up of the "greater neighborhood" has changed, Shorewood' s community park 1.5 blossoming nearby. 'I'he ci.ty must balance the needs of the greater neighborhood \V'i th .cequestin9 bond funds in a Shorewood referendum to-continue improvements to a neighborhood park located in Chanhassen. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 4E. One of a number of options which may be considered is to "sell back" the property to Minnewashta Church which is looking for more land to build a new church. Even with Shorewood's community park close by this would leave west Shorewood and northwest Chanhassen without a neighborhood park. Another option, which may be more pali table to the ci ty of Chanhassen is for the City of Chanhassen to own Cathcart Park. Such a transfer of land could be made with a few stipulations such as: . The conveyance would be made on the express condition that said premises shall be used for outdoor public park and recreational purposes only and said premises shall be dedicated to such use forever. . . That Shorewood residents would not be restricted from using said park facilities. organizations which restrict Shorewood residents participation may not reserve the facilities. . That Chanhassen accept Cathcart Park and improve it to meet the high standards of its fine park system within the normal, planned time frame. . That the "cottage" being clolrrently utilized as a warming house shall be returned to the individual who donated it upon their request. A copy of the Cathcart Park plan is attached. A hockey rink, basketball court, play area and tennis courts already exist. The Little League field would need to be moved south to make room for a parking lot. A warming house/picnic pavilion has not been built. . Because the Minnewashta Church will soon be at a decision point, the Park Commission and City Council have asked that I contact you immediately concerning this option. It is my hope that the city of Chanhassen can respond with a r~action to this option by the end of May. Please call me if I can be of any assistance quring your deliberations. Sincerely, CITY OF SHOREWOOD James C. Hurm City Administrator JCH.al Enclosure: Map . -.; \ / ." / ..- ...- / / / r,--- / . . tm . / , ... \ .. " " ) ;; } ) / / r /' / i / ! / . / . I _/ /" I' I 0 I " I .. " I "U / ;; I i) , . . \ " " \ .) , x . ! _ ,.6 --- -- -! ;; .i.~ I.U II!! !.-,. 'I:: U'. 'Ii! t .1 ~IJi f,.i !~.l Iii: il -.' ..... --- -- . , - ......- -./ "- "- -? '- . x. I I -~..::.-- _/ - ( \ ! p I I "U I g I <; / ; ) . \ ~ Ip :f rrq o I I \ \ \ \ i ,I \ I , I ,0 I I(] 10 :: o n ... .. '< I o I I ~ ;\ !' , : ! , ! , . , " / I V :f " I ., " !I ,I ,I I : \ i " , . : c:: G --- - -----~--------- _.-.:-- Q~~--- '" -- --- -- -- r:..:'__~.~:-- ;;:.-- -....-.... - " -- __ _ t...._- \~. -- -- I -- I --- I -- -- --- i : . , . l, 1 I ! J i t CATHCART PARK City ot Shorewood,Minnesota Master Plan BADGER PARK PLANNED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN C Basketball Court $9,600 1993 R4 Playground Equipment 15,000. 1995 AD Bleachers 2,500. 1996 D4 Trail 2,500. 1996 R4 Landscaping 5,000. 1998 D3 Picnic Pavilion 10,200. 1998 D3 . Horseshoes 800. 1998 D3 Picnic Areas 2,500. '2001 C3 Landscaping 5,000. 2004 C3 Lighting 12,000. 2011 R4 Multi-use Building (not in PClP) 40,000. 2011 C1 Irrigation 24.000. 2013 C1 TOTAL $119,500. . . (1) FUNDING (2) 1990 PARK COMMISSION PRIORITY RATING R.....REFERENDUM c.....CITY D.....DONATION 1 = LOW / 5 = HIGH CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 MEMO TO: Park Commission ~ FROM: James C. Hurm, city Administrator DATE: April 2, 1992 . RE: Cathcart Park - Agenda Item No. 5 MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis · (612) 474-3236 Minnewashta Church is ~ndertaking a building fund drive at this time. They ~lculd like to make some building decisions within the ~ext few months. I":. so-ems to me that the 'Nay to prevent "decisior: gridlock" is to make a proposal to the city of Chanhassen for us to donate Cathcart Park to them. They will then have something ~o respond to.. Such a proposal would not prevent us from pursuir.g other . optiO~1S such uas woz:king ..d th Minnewashta Church. Please review the attached letter. We can work on .specif ic wording at the April 6th meeting. If the commission can agree on wording for such a proposal the action would be to recommend to the City council that the proposal be sent to the city.or- Chanhassen. Chanhassen IS response to our proposal will dictate .the direction of future discussions. . JCH.al , , At ".:ach~r.ent A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 April 9, 1992 . Mrs. Nancy Taylor 5915 Afton Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mrs. Taylor, Thank you for your recent letter inquiring into permission for your son Josh to sell prepackaged candy and gum at baseball games at Cathcart and Freeman Parks. To our knowledge the City has not allowed private individuals to sell food and refreshments at City parks in the past. The City Park Commission is recommending' that the City Council deny your request. The City Council might very well look differently upon a similar request from a non-profit group with acceptable liability insurance and a community enhancement mISSIOn. . The Park Commission certainly admires the industriousness of young Josh and hopes you understand the concern for precedence in this case. The City Council will make a final determination on your request at their meeting Monday, April 13, 1992 at 7:00PM. You are certainly welcome to attend. The agenda is enclosed for your information. " Sincerely, TY OF SHOREWOOD uvtee C tfAuvvV\ James C. Hurm - City Administrator JH.sn A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 4F . . PARK COMMiSSiON................. SEE OTHER SIDE FOR CITY CODE REGARDING THIS LETTER ((}arC/1 ~ 4, 1'19:1. . (lu&t.. '11vt. f4tAA1\.j J) /lU~ ia.1hd -6- b ~ '. ~+ &VA ~ --t:.Aa.i- Cl'U-)f ~'L Juuf) if .~ ~ a.-Y- '~~. sk ,~ Yud- c2. W~ -& fP<</~ U/r1.dv.. Cdy. ~ qO;J.O;), /.4t-~.(Pj .~ ~ (;c:itf /J1Le,o( Ct ~/\. ~ ~/V --tlv.- ~ ~ 6- ~ ~ o.;;f 0-- fL~' ., O{/JL ~ W ~ ~ ~~nd .,ct', J~LuL' ~-&J:t ~ ct,z.~ b- ~ ~ ~/V j ..~~~C4;d~, . fk. urd-c.& ~ on..~ ~.(. - f2 ..~a~~V.cY~~~ .' . '1J'Ir- ~"Jo-.it L~ ! c2 ~ ~.) ,OA~ ~h t;. dff duA. b- ~ ~ .~ ~. W/L L~~ . ~~ -8LLfr- Ur o--k-~~~~ CV>~ /}b~ ..1:AA;f we. ~ ~' ~ ~ .~ /}?tNc.d · ~ I ~O~ 70~ s-c; IS- ~ &-ad AJJ-'1~d /11lff SS-s3/ J' 902.01 SECTION: 902.01: 902.02: 902.03: 902.04: 902.05: 902.06: 902.07: 902.08: 902.09: 902.10: 902.01 : 902.02 CHAPTER 902 PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS ,,-- f Purpose General Regulations and Rules of Conduct Animals in Park and Recreation Areas Vehic1e Restrictions Additional Rules for Use of Park and Recreation Facilities Use of Recreational Facilities by Athletic Associations . Discrimination in Parks Application of Provisions to City Employees Administrative Rules and Regulations, Violation . PURPOSE: The purpose of this Chapter iS'to regulate the use of and to provide uniform rules of conduct for City parks and recrea- tional areas in the City. .. . .,. Subd. 6. Soli~iting: Sell,. solicit or conduct any commercial enterprise unless authorIzed by WrItten permit from the City Council. '...., ,./ " MA YOR ' Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City. Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 13 March 1992 RE: Bernstein, William - C.U.P. for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Sq. Ft. FILE NO.: 405 (92.04) BACKGROUND . Mr. William Bernstein proposes to add on to his existing home at 5920 Afton Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). He plans to convert his existing garage into a family room, then build a new attached garage on the south end of the house. The new garage together with an existing pole barn puts the property in excess of the 1200 square feet of accessory space which is allowed for lots in the R-1A District. Consequently, he has requested a conditional use permit to allow more space. The applicant's existing house contains 1098 square feet of area. Converting the existing garage and adding a mud room in the new garage result in 1652 square feet of principal building above grade. The new garage, plus the existing pole barn total 1647 square feet of area. Exhibit B shows the location of existing and proposed structures on the site. Exhibit C includes photographs of the existing pole barn. Exhibits D and E show floor plan and elevation, respectively, of the house, addition and new garage. The applicant's request is explained in his letter, dated 31 January 1992 (Exhibit F). ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Accessory space is regulated by Section 1201.04 Subd. 2.d.(4) of the zoning ordinance. This section allows for accessory space to exceed 1200 square feet subject to a number of conditions. Following is how the applicant's request complies with the code: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 58 . BJN:ph . cc: a. The total amount of accessory space (1647 square feet) is within the total area of the principal structure (1652 square feet). . b. Total accessory space does not exceed 10 percent of the minimum lot size for the R-1A zoning district (10% x 40,000 = 4000 sq. ft.). c. Although the new garage is designed to complement the existing home, the existing pole barn is a nonconforming structure (prohibited by Section 1201.03 Subd. b.(1) of the Code). Ordinarily the c.u.p. process is used to require that nonconforming structures be brought into conformity with current zoning requirements. In this case two factors mitigate the existence of the pole barn: 1) the addition blocks the barn from view of the street; and 2) the ratio between accessory space and principal dwelling is brought into conformity. It is recommended that the applicant be required, as part of his building permit to plant three, six foot evergreen trees to the north of the pole barn. This will screen the most visible side of the barn. d. The architecture of the addition is consistent with the existing structure. The proposed addition, combined with the landscaping recommended herein is considered to be an improvement to a nonconforming situation and allows the applicant to expand his home. It is therefore recommended that the c.u.p. be granted subject to the applicant obtaining a bid from a certified nurseryman for the landscaping and posting a letter of credit or cash escrow for 150 percent of the bid. The landscaping should be completed within six months of the Council's approval of the c.u.p. Jim Hurm Dave Sellergren William Bernstein - 2 - i I I ,--, ! !. r-1 I ~, ; 11m , I: SMITHTOWN " ~-. S~'\t.c..+-" S--, J ',' "S', t.(. : I ; I I, I' I: I, I: I: ........Iff Iii I I ' I I i I ! .e_ 145 10.... I 9 It ----- ~ TRACT A ~~ ~\9l '\ , , , , , I ' ~....... 1:0".++'. : ~ : , (9).' ~QD~ 1 , ' , ' L.--------L! PoUtT 1$ LOT 10 1 ~i ~~ . zgl.09 2 (5) 255 l'i'>l~ ~ (6) ------1.---------..--- ~ ~(Q): ~~ r ~ ~ (7) ~ (8) ~~ 8 ~:::::{:::~_:~=====~ ~ . (7) ~ (5) 255 . .6 -----_!_----_.~._-_.- . 5 (8) 11 ... ~I ,.<0..... ,.,. '01 Sf i 1\)1 "0 ',t, ,.., ;;: .. 6 ~ ( 17) ~ ( 18) ~ ~ 51 (2) ,.., (I) 5 ( 161 " _... 1.E-!1-... 2U1....... ~01..... I iJ 11'1 II~ 115 ... <i' .. I g: .. ~ ~IO) $ ~ 2 ( 11) '" .. II,' S '.. . S ;.. S 15 (9) 51~. I" ~ I I , , I I ' , I' , . I I ~ I , ! I I ........~ .::::; :; i ::1 MANN; lA II II 0:1--- 011 II \ \ \ v'cc::"' DC-:::: \ .. tJorth WO-\ +0 ~.. k. ... :: ;:; ;; .. I: 13 11 10 9 '" '" 12 on e :e~ (7) ~ (6) ~ ~ (4) :::l ('3) ... ,.., ( 5) ,.., ,.., ,.., ( 2) .. Exhibit A (8) ~ . T"9.76 SITE LOCATION T.lll "~ ,,~ 11~ ,,, . . ~ Bernstein - C.D.P. ,.., ,,~ ~ 91'.97 Na9.lj.~-r--- -"."'11 ....-...i.-. ~W"ya;; I ~ ~, '€i~ (11 ,tIC t,.ljl . / [;~ 't /. , 'J~I" ./ I V/~ /' ,191' - /;ti../ g I k u.fl /. " Description: (t. ,/ ,Of/ .1/ );. . .. -~ LAND,SURVEYORS Survey for: CROCKER CONSTRUCTION, INC. -- ......-; 3 ~ r:. __ I '~i(:; }I' ..'J ~ -; JJ . -rl {ii/I, I ~/01' rv . . -. - - " -" ....... . ~ "';.'.:;7 .. /1& A' /1/ -'_....'7 -..... ;t #v ~. . " .tlJ ..... ./' I \~..... / ../ NOTE: . ~4~ ~ ~.1J'U4. 8713 OUPONT AVENUE SOUTH B~OOMINGTON. MINN. 65420 aaa'2084 t- P,:lof'OS:E1> ~~W G~IaA~1L Lot 2, Block 2, AFTON MEADOWS Elevations shown are on an assumed ba.sis ~ "r)1 ~ \$ ~ We hereby ~rtify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 16th day of June , 197-1-. ~ I by . ZII7I../ ( . - . Minnesota I /v.~":41' =? / /./;c)_ 6'3 Exhibit B PROPERTY SURVEY . . Exhibit C EXISTING POLE BARN .;'1 t B !l " ,~ , ' (I. ., .......::~ .~, ,';: " \ " . . . I , ,~; " "':' I:: ':' !: ~ I'" , ' ... t.. ::<..' .' , ...,; . :i :! .' ..,. ., " '" I~ , . ',:' .:1:. . ~ '.: , . ., ~ ! . ,~. .' '....': I . .. . . '., .. I ~. . .: " . . . '.,' ',' ~ () tJ g to " ;. .:1"~-~: &.i~--a..Jt....;:.....:-.l....~ . . - ----- I " ~ I I, I! /' r-'" ~ ,~ I \ -::- .- I;,;, . . ',', ,... \ . \. -'1 I " ' l.',: ..... ," ,',' ]',;~ ~~\'~yt-,._--_. ~,--- )- \ ' / >,:*\(\\ ~ 1\" '- \ '''/I~" ~~~ \ \ , "'-.. , .\ \ \ . ;" \ . I ~'\ \ \ J' ;\.r/ \ / \' ,,/. --;- , ~\ ./ ~?;;-~-;: ,,' ;.-::;;Y' \( d:"-:-~";-' , \, ,. /" /., " ..<<~-;r. ',," " ../ \. \ ~ ~-r'..--;,,/ ./' , \ \\ /'::~~:/ ,/ :\ ~/ ~~: .~; ?:' <,' " '\;/ , , < . ,',: ".~v\"~~'~) , ,,' . "'~ .' , - - -- V . ~;~>''". .. .?:rr=-> .-' ~\"''h). ....._:.. . ..~~,~~- . \~...,~ \ ,....:1; ~.,r-J \ l;. \ ,\ t= ~', ~ /::;:'f '0 \ \1,"> . \ i" J, /;----- .~ ' \. ...;;,~~ L....~... ;../' ~~ ,""""=;- tJ- .')\ i ' "~ ,'/' \ ' .;jj;-::'-(?: .~ \~ ,: \" \\ \ \~ ..'\ '\\ , \ ~ ~ ,. . ;k, "~ \. '\' , ','~\\ .', ' \ \' \ ' . '. ' . .:..... \' " \\'~ "i\ '~~. \"" \-~ , ' . ")..!J"O . . . \...\\,e .:t." ~' Al.~'\ -/'.. , , "',' "':., / . .}!","~." . ./,.-/" ~ ....-- ------ " .. ",~. . ",,'/,' ' ., r.. I .,.--.....-/// ;. .,.,' Exhibit D FLOOR PLAN : ,: , ." ,~I .. . . " "-, ". -: . , ~ ' ~. . , I t,.. . , " - . u,J -~~ "--r(' , \- ):"'- j '-,,~ , , -- . , i , . -- . i , " i \I ,- , .' ., ;~. .; ,~ , !~. ' ~ .i: r! -~ - .r.~':~ /,l'~1~ ;l t11~' 'I .1 . . ,~\'.'.' ... . I ..' !,\'~' 1 Exhibit E FRONT ELEVATION ,-, . , // Ll7il , .J', I /.~I January 31, 1992 city of Shorewood Mr. Brad Nielsen 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Permit Dear Mr. Nielsen: I am proposing to remodel my existing attached garage into a new family room while at the same time adding on a new attached garage. Please see the enclosed architectural drawings for the floor plan and front elevation. It is my understanding after conversations with Pat Hilgesen and Joe Pazandak that a conditional use permit is required before my construction project can get underway. At the rear of my property is a 26' x 36' pole barn that was existing since prior to my ownership. The existing pole barn along with the proposed new garage~dition would make the total accessory square footage at. 1673,. As per ci ty code section 1201.03. Subd. 2.d.(4) 1200 square feet is the minimum allowable except by conditional use permit. with the remodel of the existing attached garage into living space, the flo~rea of the principle house structure would be approximately .1726) square feet, thus meeting the requirement of city code '~tion 1201.03 subd. 2.d. (4)(a). with the regard to all of the above, please understand and consider that if I choose to build on a new family room in a different direction other then into the existing attached garage,. the condi tional use permi tting would become unnecessary. For the purposes of the house floor plan flow and the overall aesthetic appeal, the proposed expansion would by far work the best. Al so pI ease note that a previous owner originally required inspections. was issued when barn and passed the all building permi t bui I t the pol e For your review I am enclosing photographs of barn. Also I have enclosed my property survey. have sketched in the pol e barn location and attached garage. my home and pol e On the survey I the new proposed Exhibit F APPLICANT'S REOUEST LEITER . . We are a family of five and the additional living space is very important to us. I am very hopeful that you will look favorably upon my request for a condi tional use permi t such that I can acquire the normal building permits and get my project underway. I f you have any questions, or requi re further information or submittals, please call me at home 410-1740 or at work 939-5255. Sincerely, it4J5~ Bill Bernstein Resident and Homeowner BB/ba Enclosures MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 12 March 1992 RE: Preliminary Plat - Boulder Ridge Estates FILE NO.: 405 (92.03) BACKGROUND L and M Properties, Inc. has submitted a preliminary plat for approximately 15 acres of land located at the westerly end of Noble Road, 270 feet south of Edgewood Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit.A, attached). The developer proposes to subdivide the property into eleven single-family residential lots as shown on Exhibit B. . The property in question, as well as all the property surrounding it, is zoned R-IA, Single- Family Residential. The minimum lot size for this district is 40,000 square feet. The land is characterized by high ground on the west half of the site, dropping to wetlands on the east and south sides of the site. The property has access from the east via an extension of Noble Road and from the north via Northgate Circle, a platted, but undeveloped right-of-way. All but one of the lots are served by the extension of Noble Road. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS A. Zoning Requirements. The plat is considered to be consistent with Shorewood' s Comprehensive Plan which calls for 0..1 unit per acre in the area in question. All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum area, width and depth requirements of the R-IA District. Lots range in size from 40,000 square feet to 128,200 square feet. Lots 5 and 6 are significantly larger than zoning requires due to portions of the site having low wet areas with questionable soils. Per Shorewood's Wetland Ordinance, all lots have been designed to have 40,000 square feet of area, exclusive of designated wetland. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore St B. Subdivision Requirements. Site design is consistent with area plans which have been reviewed by the City in the past, including the resubdivision sketch prepared as part of Oak Ridge Estates Third Addition (see Exhibit C, attached). 1. Streets. The resubdivision sketch identified two alternatives for accessing the site. The extension of Northgate Circle has been discarded due to questionable soil conditions on the east side of Lot 6. It should be noted that Lot 6, Block 2 will necessitate a driveway within the right-of-way of Northgate Circle. This will require a r.o.w. permit at such time as a house is built on Lot 6. When a final plat is prepared for this project it should be stated in a development agreement and in protective covenants that Lot 6 shall not be subdivided unless Northgate Circle is constructed as a standard cul-de-sac street. . The extension of Noble Road terminates with a temporary cul-de-sac and extends its right-of-way to the west edge of the site to accommodate development of properties to the west. 2. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. a. The topography shown on the preliminary plat was taken from out-dated aerial surveys. As part of the final plat the developer should provide a detailed grading plan for the project, including accurate current contours, proposed grading, and building pad locations and elevations. . b. The subject site drains primarily to a man-made pond on the east side of the site. The pond drains south and then west to a large wetland system which ultimately empties into Lake Minnetonka. Area residents have experienced drainage problems as a result of the size of the culvert located at the south end of the pond. The developer's plan proposes increasing the outlet by constructing three 18-inch storm sewer pipes where the problem occurs. This solution is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The final plat should include conservation easements over all designated wetland areas. c. Sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended from the west end of Noble Road. Per the Subdivision Ordinance, the developer proposes to extend it to the west edge of his property for further extension to undeveloped properties to the west. Since city water is not available to the site, private wells will be needed. 3. Park Dedication. The current Parks and Open Space Plan does not identify a need for additional land in the vicinity of the subject property. Nor do any of the trails proposed in the new Trail Plan abut this site. While it is assumed that fees will be required as park dedication (11 x $750 = $8250), the plat will still be referred to the Park Commission at its 6 April meeting. - 2 - . . RECOMMENDATION . . The plat complies with Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan and all zoning and subdivision requirements. It is therefore recommended that the preliminary plat be approved subject to the following: 1. A fmal plat must be submitted within six months of Council approval of the preliminary plat. 2. As part of the final plat the developer must submit an up-to-date (within 30 days) title opinion for review by the City Attorney. i \ ~ . 3. With his final plat the developer should submit protective covenailts stating that Lot 6, Block 2 will not be subdivided until such time as Northgate Circle is constructed to City standards with a standard cul-de-sac. \,---- 4. Streets, grading, drainage and utilities must be approved by the City Engineer. 5. The final plat must include a detailed grading plan showing up-to-date topography, proposed contours and building pad locations and elevations. ~ . 6. Thefmal plat should include drainage and conservation easements over the designated wetland areas. 7. Prior to release of the final plat, sewer equalization charges and park dedication fees must be paid for the project. 8. Upon receipt of a complete final plat, the staffwill prepare a standard development agreement for the project. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Dave Sellergren Ron Miller Park Commission - 3 - ~ANO L LAKE M/NNETONKA (UPPER LAKE) VICTORIA _AKE VIRGINIA , \~ " //----..~\ /;Ij.~, .. We C"\- '" I ,. = I OCt> ' Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Boulder Ridge Estates - Preliminary Plat ,.. j n ~ : if I I f I I , !i I' I, j i III Iii '! 1111 I '11:t1: ,Hi l ~ ! I i~ ~H1~;~H~j hI I -l u I (~ I \ u \ '. I . ~2?~J: !l:"'t)tt~J,10N : ( I I I j .' ~~:"S:;~J~"- .. --' I \0, _ ." J -:~ ,,0:.;----. {" I \'1.\ j II t'~"\ ~ '''~~ ~~. ti) I '~. ~ a. \~~\ : 'I t-.r-.l \ " ~ y ~ \"' :' UF ! '~~\"\ <\:;) i (,"', c' !. _,f /j~ I j i \ "II" ,.' ' a I . - 'J 'l' \ \ \ 1.. ': "< o .,." !/ " l \ I -. .--~ - o~ -- '-7'7' '/ " I ",' \-'- I . ("'.'.....'."... ___ ' /" I W . , I .--. I - , '" l.:) ~....--- I /-.--..-:.:..~_. Q ." t' ." - w.( I I \ : .--" t. ,./_... ..... ... .-.. I.' .._..... \: . r . , ',,,~-----_...._~P- - ,-'" . "'1 ( ,. r-.n ~'" -. . f, -- './~ ," '~""'- '=~. .., ! - --- -- .- - ... ~ \~ .~;:.:~:~>>.-.~\. r 1 .",' -,p..1"'( :;:1[=:;;;.}" tLl. ", An II~ I J .... ,I. " r--' I . ,.\:<-~ --. i, .. \ 1'\. ,'.'... ..'- ",w- .,..\ . ~ ..~_ _."------"'....-c \ I \ ' ...,. ='......._,-~ I' - ", . '\.- -'''' --- ! ~! 'lllL r '::'-~\fJVI ~h"I' ,;L -..).,' _,n / ~i 11,(,' I '..' , ' ' ~~. I !ilii, "'''(':~OC''''- ,/('-1"'--1 '-t.. (l~ /' 7,i.' ~ - 11.'/ i" :' J .I I' .. J' "" . .' I ' ~I ~ I ! Ln t;. t . : ", J./ ~~ ~ I i !I' 1111\\ '.. -- ..~ ~.u_ .0 ..J" --- -~- _:--- . ~--r /.r .' [;ji II 9 ~ J1' J I "'I ; ~ l ~ liil!! ~ · ~ ~ I i I!i':' ~I ... I I I "I:ill ~: ~ ~ ~ ! ~ \,!ii' ~! a a ~ :11 ~ l!! i II . -.--~._-~..---~.......--- <Il Q) ~ <1l ~ E-< <Il <t;[.Ll ....:I p.. Q) bll :>-<"0 p::: ''''; ~<t;p::: :z; ~ H H 'M::;:: Q) .DH"O ''''; ....:I ...... .c: [.Ll ;:l x p::: 0 [.Llp..~ ! ~ . . ~ O'ttO'(.1 I 2N3~Ol I \ I I 1 I I I ~h _ ..LN'v'~8 - I \'00 \ \ \ I \ \ \ I I I i .1 i I i I '~t 'I )- '{? S. V. ['" _.1 I I I I '.. \ .. \ I .._J ','l , J. F o .. _ -- __u -.. '_"1 I I i"', ,. " . . '. \ . \ \, ";~._~:~_.':" 1 --. I I I ~.........--.. -\- ',. , :1.. ./ \ , I I , ..._.-t'~. "'j ') I / / (... ....... ~~~.~,~:'i " ....,......... \1 P .1 h 11 l~ H ~ , e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ,-~~~ '" , l' .... ...... ~IP"I;'__~""""""'" . ''-') C:J ~., \~ C' ,- ~\~~I r., \ , ,1.-;.1 ""'\ ,-I !:; 2:/ '1'1 ^ / \// V '1'7 I'll ~ ('__7)-/~/'~ ^ 11'1 I .trIo'} _ _.J :..J..... ,V I V \ ./ _L _.J I I...., '~ <) ~ ; /.f -_.~ _.~____1__ ; ~~ ~t~ l~-!~ , . ~ ~ , . , \ .~ ;- , ,:; :::1- - .'~ r-' . "- ~ ~-" J:) , ~ " ic'" '- ~ f \ :-- '- I '~ ~r \ \ ~ t ;\ l!, I '.::!, \'( \ \ ,~'\ I \ ~, '~\ \ ' \ \ " '.. ~ ~,\- . ~ . .. " " '" " .... .. .. -1 I _~L_ ........... , , " --. ' o~ ". ~ & 0'" " . ~8 -. )-, " ~.. -" "~J -''-'. ;~ , '- .. '. '. ........ I \ " '" " -~ \, 3rd Addit ion " " \ \ \ \ "- " \ _..-- ..... .... ~~ ':", h .... .... I,-........~. To: Mr. Brad Nielsen Subject: Outlot B, Oak Ridge Estates Third Addition As per our conversation of Wed. Feb 19th 1992. My only concern in the plan to subdivide Outlot B is that there is no change in the current pond outlet until some form of increased culverts are in place. The free flow of water is very important to me and my neighbors. I trust that the new culverts will have plenty of capacity and installation will be closely monitored by the city. I will be out of town on Tuesday March 3rd and unable to attend the meeting. Please let me know if you need any other information from me. . Thanks Jim Mahoney 26485 Edgewood Rd. 474-5382 Shorewood Mn. 55331 . 1 FILE COpy Exhibit D . . . Ross '1/1. Putnam 26665 Edgewood Road Excelsior, ..0\innesota 55331 FiLE COpy March 5, 1992 Mr. Brad Nielsen .Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Mn. 55331 Dear Mr. Nielsen: I will be unable to attend the hearing regarding development of property south of Edgewood Road because of a prior commitment but I do have concerns. I was astonished to discover anyone would be A) allowed to B) consider the development of that property. All one need do is drive by the intersection of Grant Lorenz and Wild Rose Lane to see how wet tr.<at land is. Behind our house as well it is obvious a great deal of the land is very wet nOlf and has been for the vast majority of the last year. Sure, it can be filled in. But I thought there was protection for marshy, wet land like that. Before approval for more houses is given, take another look at that impact. Clearly it will cause disruption to the water table, many kinds of wild animals and birds. I believe we do not need greater intrusion into an already stressed environment. Si~SjrelY r-:-J I ..(~f/~~~~ i I Ross W. Putnam Exhibit E .i __," !II . . Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors March 13, 1992 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Brad Nielsen, City Planner Re: BOULDER RIDGE ESTATES Preliminary Plat Review OSM Project No. 4590.00 Dear Mr. Nielsen: As requested, we have completed a review of the Preliminary Plat of the referenced property dated March 5, 1992. Specifically, we have reviewed this plat with regard to sanitary sewer, storm sewer, streets, and grading. We have not reviewed this document for conformance with zoning or for items not of an engineering nature. SANITARY SEWER The proposed layout is unacceptable. There is an apparent pipe conflict with the storm sewer crossing at station 2+65. Also, it appears impossible to maintain sufficient depth of cover for structural and thermal protection of the sanitary sewer. Finally, there is no service provided for Lot 6, Block 2. We recommend investigating a connection through Northgate Circle into Edgewood Road. Insulation will be required for all sanitary sewer lines with less than 5 feet of cover. Sanitary sewers with less than 3 feet of cover in the roadway are unacceptable. STORM SEWER Catch Basins are recommended at about station 6 + 00 on both sides of the road. The current plan calls for about 700 feet of gutter flow, which is generally unacceptable. The Developer should provide calculations showing that the 3-18" arch pipes are sufficient to carry the 10-year recurrence rainfall event of critical duration. Also, it should be shown that the proposed storm sewer and grading is sufficient to prevent flooding of proposed and existing homes in the 1oo-year event of critical duration. Equal opportunity Employer . Brad Nielsen March 16, 1992 Page 2 The Developer should provide lowest opening elevations for the homes upstream of the arch pipes. A positive overflow elevation at least 1 foot below the lowest opening elevation should be maintained at station 2+65. STREETS The existing temporary cul-de-sac on Noble Road should be converted to a through-street, with driveways extended as necessary. . The extension of Northgate Circle to Noble Road should be considered. The proposed extension is at, or very near, the allowable cul-de-sac length of 2000 feet; any development to the west could not be allowed without completion of the roadway back to Edgewood. Also, public safety would be enhanced by having alternate routes available to the plat. The poor soils in the area will result in the requirement for a fairly substantial street section. The Developer should be made aware of the City's requirements with regard to section 'and subgrade correction. The width of the right of way and street itself appear to Dlatch the existing segment of Noble Road. EROSION, RESTORATION AND GRADING The Developer will need to obtain permits from at least the watershed district. Other permits may be required due to the wetlands involved. . We have not reviewed the soil report that was prepared for this project. It may be necessary to do extensive subgrade corrections for both street and utility work. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. #~ Joel A Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer March 17, 1992 Planning Commission City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN Dear Planning Commission Members: We are writing to express our concern with the development of Outlot B, Oak Ridge Estates Third Addition, P.I.N. 32-117-23-21-0026. Our concern stems from the possible development of a road leading from the development and going north to Edgewood Road. Our concerns are as follows: 1. The traffic going east on Edgewood Road travels at a rate of speed generally higher than the posted limit. This seems to occur because there is a hill just to the west of the proposed intersection of Northgate Circle and Edgewood Road. Vehicles build up momentum cresting the hill and gain speed as they descend the hill. . 2. The proposed intersection is near enough to the crest of the hill that a dangerous condition will exist for traffic exiting Northgate Circle onto Edgewood Road. 3. Additional traffic entering onto Edgewood Road will create a more dangerous traffic flow. This is especially true during the summer when people use the Howard's Point Marina. Traffic and the reduced distance that drivers can see because of the hills make'it difficult for pedestrians to use the road. 4. The intersection of Edgewood Road and Grant Lorenz Road must currently be negotiated with caution -- there is only a yield sign for the Edgewood Road traffic. Additional traffic will make this intersection more dangerous. . 5. The newly constructed house in the southeast corner of the intersection is built on soils raised above the surrounding grade. This is likely to cause runoff onto the proposed road creating a hazard in the winter. 6. The combination of the new house and the proposed road is likely to cause runoff onto our property. We hope that these concerns will be adequately addressed prior to any action by the Commission. Si~ ?; ~ "",-. ~'->..,'\;;)~ '~~rick M. Furland Jane H. Furland 26575 Edgewood Road Shorewood, MN 55331 SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PUBLIC SAFElY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A YOUNG of Police ~~ - '2. f,ffl (612) 474-3261 Chief MEMORANDUM To: James C. Hurm, City Administrator Rick Young, Chief of Police/Emergency Management Direc~ From: Date: April 1, 1992 Subject: Preliminary Plat for Boulder Ridge Estates ~I have reviewed the proposed plat for the above referenced project. I am extremely concerned with the plan which results in a 2,000 foot cul- de-sac. Even from a normal public safety perspective, this is extreme. However, it is exacerbated in this case due to the complete lack of any close access points to the end of the cul-de-sac. Should Noble Road be severely blocked near its entrance, the only other way to access the lots near the end of the cul-de-sac would be from Edgewood Road, a distance of at least 800 feet over "hill and dale". Further, I note that there is a provision for the extension of Noble Road even further from the present proposed cul-de-sac. This would probably present an even greater public safety concern depending upon what is eventually proposed for the area west of this development. If it included another exit from the development, it might solve the public safety problem. . The other proposal in my packet -of information showed a through street to Northgate Circle. The development of this proposal, which has apparently been discarded at this time, 'would be much preferable from a public safety viewpoint. I read in my packet some concerns expressed from Edgewood Road residents with increased traffic such a connection might create. I believe any such added traffic would be very minimal. In fact, I would expect most traffic to use the connection to Grant Lorenz Road. I would agree that perhaps we should consider recommending a change to the Code limiting a cul-de-sac to a distance shorter than 2,000 feet. I can not think of a circumstance where such a distance would be acceptable for public safety aspects. / Serving South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay , MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 7 April 1992 RE: Doherty - Proposed Street Vacation - Gardendale Road FILE NO.: 405 (92.05) Upon reviewing Mr. Doherty's request and the staff report, dated 3 March 1992, the Planning Commission recommended that the division/combination and partial street vacation be approved contingent upon dedication of a 50 foot strip of his westerly parcel as right-of- way instead of the 30 feet which has been proposed. . In a letter from his attorney (Exhibit A, attached), dated 23 March 1992, Mr. Doherty states his objection to having to dedicate 50 feet and proposes a compromise of 35 feet. According to his attorney, the compromise results in Mr. Doherty giving up app{oximately 3000 square feet of property in exchange for 2800 square feet of right-of-way. Regardless of how much land the City requir~s, the applicant must provide new legal descriptions for the following: . a. The portion of r.o.w. to be vacated. b. The portion of his property to be dedicated. c. His remaining property plus the vacated portion of his property. Once received, these descriptions will be incorporated into the vacation and division/ combination resolutions. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Joel Dresel Tom Doherty Joe Zwak A Residential Community on clake Minnetonka's South Shore 5D .. JOSEPH D. ZWAK ATTORNEY AT LAW 5101 THIMSE!'" AVENUE. SUITE 200 MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55345 ~ 2 A ,gdl AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE ~ 7~..w06 March 23, 1992 . Mr. Brad Nielsen City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: Thomas Doherty - Subdivision and Street Vacation Dear Brad: After the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, 1992, Mr. Doherty and I reviewed the Commission's proposal that the Doherty's transfer to the City a 50 foot strip of Lot 1 in exchange for the vacation of a portion of Gardendale Road.', . As you know the purpose of this whole process is to correct a problem situation which the Dohertys inherited when they purchased their residence inJ971. The reasonable solution is to corne up with an exchange of land which retains GaTdendale Road as access to the southerly parcels" of land, eliminates the encroachment of the Doherty residence on the right of way and eliminates the possibity of a private driveway through their front yard. . " The 50 foot exchange; although I am sure it is not intended, penalizes the Dohertys by requiring that they give up approximately 3500 square feet of land in exchange for 2300 square feet of vacated right of way. As we have discussed, we feel a more reasonable solution for all parties is an exchange of a 35 foot strip of Lot 1 which results in Doherty giving up approximatley 3000 square feet in exchange for 2800 square feet of right of way. I~ should also be noted that the 50 foot area given does not necessarily give the City the land area which would be best utilized should Gardendale Road ever be expanded to a developed city street. E..W\. bit A .. Mr. Brad Nielsen March 23, 1992 Page 2 ' We are proposing, for the meeting on April 19, that Dohertys exchange 35 feet of Lot 1 for the vacation of a portion of Gardendale Road. A sketch is attached which shows the approximate location of the 35 foot line. Sincerely, "I/'. . f I I .---, f ~/ ~-y-- / /' f.__._ ( . /"':..., // Ifl ;". . ], '. / ;n-,_,j- "I ,-- . \doseph D. ~ak f\ttorney atl Law enclosure ajl-wp50:nielsen . . " " , . , \. y' Acl1/c D o ~Ot>- . ~ ~ 0 'b...'l> \>'". 11".('7 ~ ~o-l. ~~ I I . ...~- , '1 I ...- '-" , ,~ (;, ~ 1- ../ .., rz," '0 ~ ~. ~ 2.4-.2 N rJ . , N \7.0 ^' 1\.' \D '- ~'R.'110,J 'ltJ . rffl ~1> e. i> 'B fT C I< - ~ '6" QITY '2.1: 1 \-\o\J~e. ~ uJ '..... ~oyil..v..)<tst COrH~f' ot Lot I ~ 5, 'Z. 'vJ (JJ 0 0 . ... 0 0 , , \~.'2. , 30 :z ~ This survey shows the location of an existin0 house in relation to the boundaries of Garden- dale Road ad1acent to Lot 1, Minnetonka MRnor Second AdcH tion. It does not purport to sho\-! any other improvements or encroachments. Leqal Description of additional Dohertv rnrc~l: That part of Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor Second vin Northeasterlv of n line drawn .. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Krist; Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 9 April 1992 RE: McDaniel - R. O. W Permit FILE NO. Streets - Gardendale Road Randall and Marianne McDaniel have purchased the property at the south end of Gardendale Road, a platted but undeveloped City right-of-way (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). As you are aware from reviewing the Doherty partial street vacation request, Gardendale Road is the only access to the property in question. The McDaniels are anxious to begin construction on their new home and have requested a permit (see Exhibit B) to use the public r.o.w. for their private driveway until such time as the road is ever built as a city street. . Due to the potential delay caused by title problems on the Doherty property, the McDaniels have shown two alternatives for how the proposed driveway will intersect with with Manor Road (see Exhibit C). Ideally, the r.o.w.realignment will be resolved by the end of June as suggested by the Doherty's attorney. However, if the Doherty's are unable to clear the title on their property, the McDaniels request permission to use the.r.o.w. as it is currently located. . . If the Doherty's anticipate any further delays in clearing the title to the parcel they propose to dedicate to the City, they may wish to grant the McDaniels a right of entry until the problem can be resolved. The City Engineer has reviewed the two alternatives and made a number of recommendations regarding the construction of the driveway. Approval of the permit should be subject to those recommendations plus a condition that the City Attorney approve the driveway maintenance agreement between the Dohertys and McDaniels. Finally, prior to starting any construction the r.o.w. and driveway centerline must be staked by the applicant's surveyor. cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Tim Keane Randall and Marianne McDaniel Tom Doherty Joe Zwak: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ ~ v.... ~:... ~s I __ 48.9"3 ...... ( 28) !9 ( 29) ; '"'-" 1'3!l ) ,. 5) : : ") : J,~( :t:: 'or:,:.., : ~ . ,.:. : : (27 Lj______ I I I I I I I I . I _t________j 51 I I I : ~.-; I . I I I I I I I I I I I :.. {"'. . ~'-="- '-""', ; I I ....- 135. 9"'~ c PT OF lOT 52 (17) ....... a::: l.U ..... s:l '" 1 ( 18) ....j /' -; '- '-'"' -, - -, :J /4 .-. . --'/.:>':'r ~'-~ ., 1'"\ 2. .~_. 0\ v. ~ -~ ;~- 53 ( 15) o.Nlt1 ( II) ("3) i :20 R 'r\,tl PART OF lOT .9 ( 10) 1010. 299.06 ISO ,;r:::------- ':( " 99'03' ,~ \ - \,; ", \.4<' .... ~ \ , \ -/....... _..r. \ (25) -'-.-7...\ .;/ \ .- \ (6) \ \ \ \ in on - - - ---.... ~ 103. <4;) .1/' .~ ~~.. ~ ~ " 1 on ~ N ~ 3 i~( 17) . t--\Cr\-~ . ,'.:~ 69 (:33) -- , , , , " " (4) , , , , ", 45 _.-;) . , .' .., .... ./ C.._} ':>" . ~,.:,...... " ( 5) '.... , , '- ( I) :I. ). .. (i - -- .... ,.,...;. _7~:..-: _~ ~~. ~_ " '00. '......... .... .J. . ...........,... .... ; f':::'.;,,"?-..,..~ .......,.... -- -- ___----iil --it' /,/""\~' 70 ~.(- ~""''''''''''''''~9' ~ C.3,!~ i~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION McDaniels R.O.W. 't Gardendale Rd. Perrn~ - o '" ., .... ( 6) -'. APPLICATION FOR PEnMIT '1'0 KEEP On. tJIAINTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLICLY O~{ED HIGllT-OF-'dAY PUHSUANl' '1'0 SliORE'dOOD OFlDHIAllCI:: NO. 121 <L .J<../) ~ ~v Please ty~e or [1rint 18g1uly 1. APPLICANT INFOR11ATION Please give the name (5) of all persons who O\ffi the private property to be maintained in right-of-way. NAME(S)J<~ND~LL- ; rv\~~I~Nt-lr; Mc.,DA.t-.lIla'"L _. . ADDRESSES 7z? I T5e.~.J LA"-lE [DE"rJ f(ZA\ ~\ ~. M~ 55 *h 44~ - 04 2.(P TELEPHONE RIGHT-OF-WAY Please name the highway, road, street, alley or other right-of-way upon which you are requesting to maintain private property. G~[z'D~N~~L..e ROAD j ~ L..1'T'i tAs!::lV1€to.ll ei' {;IJDIG.Uu-.l2 To MAlVa D 3. Please describe as carefully as possible the exact location or add~ess on the right-of-way where the private property is to be maintained, as well as the nature, extent and purpose of the requested encroac~~ent on the right-of-way. (Attach a photograph or sketch if posSible). \Nit ~rz.~ l<~SUE'$-rJlJC:r E~MI~$ION To [3Ult..D ~ND MAINTAIN At I *Foc1 "'hDE" f~1 VAT~ Drz.I\JE CENTtr~e:-D ON -n-+E" .3O-F~T \;'J~06' 6AtC::D~NDAL..E' r;;AA-~M~I'-l-r. 'HI ~ I? iHE DNL'( ACCfESS Ta Ol)~ Lp...ND ArJP ~CJ~Sp BUILDING SITS' AT . ZDXXX. M~NOiZ f?oAD. PL.SASE .. tj,€ ~ITA(..H E. V -P~\fJ IN (;$.s Fo ~!<OA D DETA I L ~ . In cons idera tion of approval of this permit, I h(~reby knowingly an~ voluntarily waive any right to recover fr0m the City of 3horewo~~ ~or dama g~ occurring to property in the right- of-way as abovt~ descr~Oec., which d~mag(' results from the performance by the City of Shorewood or its agE::uts e.f any p'.lblic duth~:3 r''':~iui('t:d ~y law. //). () La t~~-#~i06LI j1(( {/a3~V ~lfi:ifl:Knmf{~ Per'rni t ( ) Approved ( ) Not A9~H'oved Exhibit B R.O.W. PERMIT APPLICATION r"'1- ... . . : : ; ~ : ~ : ; : : iii! . . . . ..[J..l..l. . . . . . . . . : : : : 1111 ..\.1...... .:::::/ ~!) .-.... '.J '.~ ....... '::"i /' Exhibit CDRIVEWAY PLAN PROPOSED Orr SChelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis. MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors April 3, 1992 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Brad Nielsen . Re: Proposed Driveway McDaniel Residence OSM Comm. No. 4590.00 Dear Mr. Nielsen: This letter summarizes our review of the plan prepared by Coffin & Gronberg dated March 30, 1992 for the referenced project. Because the applicant seeks a right-of-way permit, this review was done with respect to public welfare and safety; the proposed driveway was not reviewed with respect to City Road standards. FIRE VEHICLE ACCESS The proposed vertical alignment is steeper than would be allowed on a City street. Because this can create access problems in icy conditions, the Fire Chief should be consulted for his concerns. . " ACCESS TO MANOR ROAD Access Along the Existing Right of Way We recommend a right angle approach to Manor Road if this alignment is 'chosen. Also, water from the driveway will not be allowed to run out onto Manor Road; the plans should show a provision for diverting water into the existing ditch. An 18" driveway culvert with flared end sections will be needed. Access Along the Alternate (easement) This alignment is preferred due to location and grade as the driveway enters Manor Road. Also, it will allow for a better driveway for the existing house along Manor Road. Again, an 18" driveway culvert will be required at Manor Road. Equal Opportunity Employer ~ GRADING AND DRAINAGE The Council and adjoining residents should be made aware that the driveway construction will likely result in substantial tree loss. Aside from the trees in the roadway itself, those trees that have their roots disturbed during construction will be subjected to stress that can result in tree loss several years after construction. The responsibility for future tree removal should be clearly spelled out in the permit. The culvert at station 2 + 50 should be capable of carrying the storm water produced by the 10 year recurrence critical duration rainfall. The culvert should be a minimum of 18" in diameter, placed at a minimum of 1.0% grade, with flared end sections and rip-rap placed on the down-stream side in accordance with MnDOT Standard Plate 3134B (if CMP is used). With these provisions, there will be a minimum of standing water on the west side of the proposed driveway; however, some shallow ponding should be anticipated during a heavy rainfall. . The boulevard slope shown (1/4"/foot) is not feasible given the amount of cut/fill and the width of the right-of-way. To minimize tree removal and the potential for erosion, the boulevard should be limited to one foot on either side of the driveway, with the resulting sideslopes constructed at a slope of about 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3:1). The retaining wall shown should be limited to 3 feet in height. The permit should state that the maintenance of this wall is strictly the applicant's responsibility. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed should be contacted for permit purposes. GENERAL There is no provision shown for.sanitary sewer. We assume this will be handled with the permit application for the house itself. . Please do not hesitate to call with any questions you may have. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INe. ? d~ ~/' J)L / -Joel A Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer ,. f MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM . TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 April 1992 RE: Hansen, Curt - Appeal "Notice to Remove~' FILE NO. Property - 23985 Smithtown Road . Mr. Hansen has requested additional time to correct violations of Chapter 501 of the City Code (Offensive and Unhealtly Substances). His request letter is attached as Exhibit A and the notice, dated 13 March, is attached a~ Exhibit B. Exhibit C is a separate zoning violation letter, dated 13 March.. " Mr. Hansen appeared . before the Council last fall on an unlicensed and inoperable vehicle violation. It does appear that progress has been made on the current violation.We\vill reinspect on Monday and report on the status of the violation at the meeting. If you have questions relative to this matter please call me prior to Monday night's meeting. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Curt Hansen A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 7 From ASAP CLAIM SERVICE 4709080 PO 488 CHANHASSEN 55317 Mar. 23. 1992 09:39 AM P02 r City of Shorewood 5755 Country Cluh Road Shore'o1ood, MN 55331 03 22 92 RF.: Notice or removAl dAted Hnrch 11, 1992 City Code Vjolation datod March J3, 199? Property Loc3t:l.on: 239R5 Smi. thtmo1n Rd., !";horewooc1, HN 55331 Property In U 34-117-23-21-0021 To \olhom It Ha y Cone e rn : Please he adviRecl th.,t I Hish to appeal ROm~ of thC'. :i toms contained in a noc1.co to remove. It 18 mv undcTRtandinp. that thi.s I'l!lpeal has to he requ1.r~d ,dthin 10 dnys. and to th~t extent, I Am in compliance. . As 1 .'lm ~ure you Rnd the city council I'Ir~ ;n.rare dud nr this perind of the yenr t V<lrds hecome ~oft nnd muddy hecause,", of the snm.rfal1 ann mcJtinr,. It:Is for this re8son thnt I first of <lI1, hrtve not de,..d t wi.eh the i terns in the complAints flr,ainst me. prior to this and T furtller TC~Uegt an extension to handle these itemR. nr:t...,in~ vehicles through my yard At this time of the year would cat1~~ deap ruts .qnd further ruin my l::twn to the extent that :l.t \V'ou] cl be far more unsir.ht1y than the prosent problems cretlta. I d :f.G ca 11 And exp].. Jned th i ~ to Hr N:I e J sen, wlm did no t have too much sympa thy towards my problem. I Rm n new resident of this comnwn:1ty as of July 1991, Bnd when I moved into the property the p.rn$S \,'at=l <'."proximate]y two feet h:lrh, and ''''1'l8 basicnlly \olCeds, I \.ror!wd h..lTO :in an ;tttempt to mal<e a lawn that \\It\s :1ttractiv(.~ for myselr and my neifl.hbors. Hhcn weR ther cond:f. Lions p'o rill i t, J hope to renew n"y efforts in mnki nr. this property an~a:'\sct to th~ community. . I :1~sume th:tt tills reqllnf't for ,.'1n.exten~i.on \dll be tlccertahl~. In the aJ.ternat:f..,~, I SRSume th.'\t I t.rj 11 be tlcivise.d "l~' to wh:at \<11 11 b(~ n("!co5sary to r,ct illY 81'pe<l1 before the city c()lmc.:fl. I~ also tlR~l1me that you w:L11 ndvi.se In€! <:IS to the OCltc of my extenR:!oll or the date I, should <lppear h(~fore th(.~ city counc:i] emu a(h.i~c me as to '~lat dncumenL~ wjl1 be necessary. Curt Hansen Exhibit A BAKKELUND APPEAL LETTER ,- ~F MAYOR Barb Brancel ....... COUNCI L " -. Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 DATE: 13 March 1992 TO: Curtis Lee Hansen 23985 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . PROPERTY LOCATION: 23985 Smithtown- Road PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: .34-117-23-23-0021 NOTICE TO REMOVE \ '\ t \ :. Offensive and Unhealthv Substances NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there exists a condition on the above referenced property which is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 of the Shorewood City Code, a copy of which Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes, but is not limited to the following: UNLICENSED AND/OR INOPERABLE VEHICLES: . Red Jeep Lic. No. 711 084 Plates not properly mounted White Dodge Truck Lie. No. 450 Fill Tabs Nov.'91 " OTHER: Television set outside; approx. J cu. yds. lumber and construction debris; approx. 15 cu. yds. tree parts; disassembled ice house in front yard setback. You are hereby required to remove the above-described matter and any other offensive matter located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501. 0 1 within ten (10) days from the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. If you do not respond to this Notice within ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lein against the property. *** PLEASE GIVE THIS MATTER YOUR IMMEDIATE A T~ BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNC Exhibit B NOTICE TO REMOVE Dated 10 March 1992 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ". MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 13 "March 1992 Curtis Lee Hansen 23985 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . Re: City Code Violations Dear Mr. Hansen: Due to a neighborhood complaint, it has come to our attention that you are in violation of Section 1201.03, Subd. 5 (Off-Street Parking Requirements) of the City Code. Specifically, the following two vehicles were found to be parked outside of the approved parking space (driveway) area on the property: 1. White Dodge truck Lie. No. 450 FrS Tabs Nov '91 2. White Motor Home Lie. No. RV 32253 Tabs F-91 . Furthermore, the following four vehicle~ or equipment are not registered to residents of the property: . .. .. 1. Red Jeep Lie. No. 711 084 License not properly mounted ----" 2. Black Blazer Lie. No. 6Q4 ATH T~bs Jul '92 3. White Dodge Truck Lie. No: 450 FID Tabs Nov '91 4. Snowmobile trailer Lie. No. A24 768 (92) Long-term parking of vehicles on residential property is an accessory use of that property reserved solely for the benefit of the property's residents. Vehicles not currently licensed, as well "as other nuisance items which constitute violation of Chapter 501 of the City Code (Offensive, Unhealthy Substances) were also noted to exist on your property. A separate violation notice is included addressing these offenses. The above-mentioned violations must be corrected within ten (10) days. Your property will be reinspected for compliance on 25 March 1992. Exhibit C ZONING VIOLATION LETTER Dated 13 March 1992 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South ; '" . . " Curtis Lee Hanson 13 March 1992 page two If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesi~te to contact our office. CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~/ ,/~./}d-~ (./ Bradley J. ielsen . Planning Director cc: Joe Pazandak '- .' .... >. l . .-. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 April 1992 RE: Bakkelund, DuWayne - Appeal "Notice to Remove" FILE NO. Property - 23155 Academy Ave. Mr. Bakkelund has asked to appear before the City Council to request more time to correct violations of Chapter 501 of the City Code (Offensive and Unhealthy Substances). His request letter is attached as Exhibit A. The notice, dated 10 March is attached as Exhibit B. It should be noted that this property has,been previously cited for similar offenses. ~ Photographs of the site will be available at the meeting on Monday night. If you have any questions relative to this matter, contact my office prior to then. , - cc: Jim Hurm . Tim Keane DuWayne Bakkelund ~ A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ... , . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 9 April 1992 RE: :McKinney, Allen - Appeal "Notice to Remove" FILE NO. Property - 4925 Rustic \Vay 1fr. Allen McKinney has requested to appear before the Council. on 13 April to appeal his most recent "Notice to Remove" offensive and unhealthy sub:;tances and a zoning violation ~etter. His request letter, dated 30 March 1992, is attache9 as Exhibit A, the notice, dated 10 l..1arch is attached as Exhibit B, and the zoning violaticn let~er is attached as Exhibit C. . It should be noted that the property has been cited several times in the past few years. In O'le of those instances the pLOperty was cleaned up by the City and in another il1st8J1.ce junk cars were towed from the property. Mr. McKinney has appeared befQre the Coun~il on two other occasions relative to code vjolaticns. 1finutes from Council meetings on 11 January 1988 and 22 May 1989 are Jttached as Exhibits D and E, respectively. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact me prior to :Monday night's meeting. cc: Jim Hurm Tim Keane Allen :McKinney Tracy Eichhoru- Hicks q A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . ~ ~~~ 5~ ~~ ceh~~ #~C7z ~ / _~~ I /:7 r 2/?~ ~->~ p~~~~ ~ SdZ;-O/'/ . . . . ~~ . /jcf/~ ~q ~.~ 2f;7 ~ /j 7~-~v~~ " " ~~.::'4- ~~ ,,/ - #~ ! , " ,/ I ~/ Exhibit A APPEAL LETTER Dated 30 March 1992 ~- \. .". -.,-'J . l~/:Af- It' .' ....,~..: r';',,, - i r !-", L.. ',,-_ c-... ~__ MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD -5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474.3236 DATE: 10 March 1992 TO: Allan McKinney 4925 Rustic Way_ Shorewood, MN - 55331 . PROPERTY LOCATIt>N: 4925 Rustic Way __ PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: 26-117-23-14-0009 -NOTICE TO REMOVE . Offensive and Unhealthy Substances NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there exists a condition on the above referenced property which is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 of the Shorewood City Code,: a copy of . which Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes, . but is not limited to the following: . UNLICEL~SED AND/OR INOPERABLE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT: Red Chevrolet truck - no lice~e and ~operable Gray Volvo - Lic# 748 CGP Mar. '92 flaftire Red truck/trailer - no license on trailer and fIlled with misc. household items Gray trailer with pump - inoperable OTHER VIOLATIONS: Tanks, drums and similar misc._ items - approx. 20 cu. yds.; vehicle parts (tires, fenders, tanks, seats, etc.) - approx. 20 cu. yds.; tree parts - approx. 1000 cu. yds.; refrigerator and dryer; blue tank arid equipment - unused; sawhorses and construction material (windows, doors, etc.) - approx. 10 cu. yds.; indoor furniture and misc. household items - approx. 40 cu. yds.; other misc. trash, garbage, junk, including mattresses, construction debris, furniture, etc. - approx. 70 cu. yds. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Sh Exhibit B NOTICE TO REMOVE Dated 10 March 1992 . . .. : You are hereby required to remove the above-described matter and any other offensive matter located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 within ten (10) days from the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. If you do not respond to this Notice wit.!1in ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lein against the property . *** PLEASE GIVE THIS MATTER YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION *** BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL . , PROPERTY FILE MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD ---~ 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 4 April 1992 . NIT. Allen McKinney 4925 Rustic Way Shorewood, ~ 55331 Re: Zoning Vio1atiGns - 4925 Rustic Way P.I.N.26-117-23-14-0009 Mr. NfcKinney: . On 10 1.1arch you were sent a "Notice to Remove" for numerous items located on the abovc- referenced property which violate Chapter 501 of the Shorewood City Code. The notice advised you that you had 10 days to appeal the notice. The appeal. then delays any corrective action until you have had a chance to plead your case or request additional time to comply from the City Council. Although you failed to submit your written appeal within the specified time, we have decided not to take corrective action until you have been heard by the City Council. Your request is scheduled for 13 April 1992. Prior to that you will receive an agenda for the meeting. '. As I mentioned to you in our office on 30 March, :several of the items listed on the notice are also violations of the Shorewood Zoning. Code, Chapter 1200. Following are a list of those items and citations of pertinent code sections: . " -Red Chevrolet truck (no license) - Section 1201.03 Subd. 5.d.(6) -Red truck/trailer (no license) - Section 1201.03 Subd. 5.d.(6) -Gray Volvo (Lic # 748 'CGP) - licensed to someone not residing on the premises - Section 1201.11 Subd. 3.a. and 3.h. -Gray trailer with pump - Section 1201.11 Subd. 3.a. -Sawhorses (numerous) - 1201.11 Subd. 3.a. You are hereby advised to remove the above-referenced items by 15 April 1992. Failure to comply with the Code will result in this matter being turned over to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you wish to appeal this order to the City Council you may do so on 13 April in conjunction with your "Notice to Remove". A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's Exhibit C ZQilllTG VIOLATIQR LETTER Datt:d 4 April 1992 . I '~, April 1992 McKinney Zoning Violations Page two If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact my office. , , CITY OF SHOREWOOD b-~/!~ Bradley J .ftels~n. . ' Planning Director . cc: James Hurm Tim Keane Tracy Eichhorn-Hicks Dave Herzog . '. '" r' " . r MINUTES MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1988 PAGE THREE CONSENT AGENDA - CONTINUED City Hall Expansion - Chance Order A change order was submltted in the amount of $1,863.00 for added work to be done to correct problems with the existing structure. Staff recommends approval of this change order. Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the above listed items and Resolutions on the consent agenda. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. RESCHEDULING OF JOINT COMMISSION MEETING . Haugen felt that the "Future Planning" Session should be earlier than the proposed March 5 th date. :' ': Gagne moved, January 16, ayes. seconded 1986 from by Haugen, 8:00 A.M. to reschedule the session for to 2:00 P.M. Motion carried - 5 SETBACK VARIANCE - 4995 ST. ALBANS BAY ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 4-88 Melissa Reifenberger of, 4995 St. Albans Bay Road was present to request two variances for a proposed addition to her home. She will need a 21' r.o.w. varlance and a 5' rear yard setback. Stover stated that the Planning Commission felt this request was the best example of why a variance should be granted. Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel, to grant the variances as requested. Motion carrled by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. . SIMPLE SUBDIVISION - 24270 YELLOWSTONE TRAIL RESOLUTION NO. 5-88 , A request from Ilka Priest of 24270 Yellowstone Trail has been received to divide and combin~a newly purchased lot. She proposes to divide the back portion off'with a 50' access strip from the road to the rear lot portiori, .thlS .~ortion will be combined with her existing property, the front lot on Yellowstone Trail will be sold. Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the combination subject to the Planners recommendations. by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes. JUNK COMPLAINT - 4925 RUSTIC WAY di vlsion and Motion.carried A writt~n request was received from Allen McKinney of 4925 Rustic Way to discuss his junk violation "notice of removal". He did not appear at this meeting. Staff stated that a notice was sent orlginally on December 4th, and reinspection was done on December 17th, nothing was done at that time. The tow t~uck was called on December 18th, McKinney then called the City the week of Christmas after being contacted by the towing company. Gagne supports proceeding with the tow removal. -3- Exhibit D COUNCIL MINUTES (Excerpt) Dated 11 January 1988 .. ". MINUTES - MONDAY, MAY 22, 1989 PAGE 6 JUNK ORDINANCE APPEALS Alan McKinney - 4925 Rustic Way . Mr. McKinney appeared before the Council to appeal his citation. He referred to his green bus stating he had the property surveyed 7 months ago and it was on his property. Nielsen said the bus was 3' on the other side of the surveyor's stakes. McKinney said he'd move it. He said the "pile of tree rubble" is his firewood. He also referred to the snowmobiles and motorcycles saying they didn't have to be licensed if on private property. There was dis- cussion on whether or not his cars we~e legal without plates on them while sitting in his yard. City Attorney Froberg said un- licensed vehicles are considered inoperable. Nielsen referred to the large trucks on the property and said only one is allowed up tc a gross weight of 12000 Lbs.McKinney thought the trucks were "grand fathered in: Attorney Froberg said trucks are not "grandfathered in. n Nielsen said this is the 3rd notice McKinney has received, 1 junk car notice, 1 trash notice (the City removed the trash), and another trash notice requested by McKinney. Gagne moved, Brancel seconded, that Alan McKinney of 4925 Rustic Way must bring his property into compliance with the ordinance with 2 days and that any vehicle under 120UO Lbs be currently licen to property owner only or removed. Motion carried - 5/0 . Greg Sorensen - 25535 Birch Bluff Road Greg Sorensen appeared before the Council to appeal his citation. He said the 2 vehicles are licensed and operable. He said he had torn down a garage to get the lumber stored on his property and he is going to use it to build a garden shed. He agreed to move the lumber, engine parts, tires, etc. next to a fenced area where it will not be visible to the neighbors. Watten moved, Stoyer seconded, to have Sorensen work with Planner Nielsen and to give pim 7:~ays to move the material. Motion carried - 5/0. Seigfried A. Weissner - 26780 Smithtown Road Planner Nielsen explained that Weissner had begun cleaning up his property but is requesting an extension because he will be out of town. Watten moved, Gagne seconded, to extend Weissner's time to Friday, June 2, 1989. Motion carried - 5/0. REQUEST FOR SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION SWEETWATER CURVE RESOLUTION NO. 41-89 Jane Austin of 19690 Swee~water Curve was present to request a speed limit reduction on Sweetwater Curve. She said it is a verv curvy street and people really speed. She saic ExhiliitE COUNCIL MINUTES (J3xcer:pt) Dated 22 May 1989 -6- . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for the construction of the Public Works facility, bids were received, opened on April 8, 1992, and tabulated according to law, and such tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit Ai and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Rochon is the lowest responsible bidder in compliance with the specifications. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Rochon in the name of the City of Shorewood, for construction of a Public Works facility, according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders and the'deposits made with their bids, except for the deposits of the successful bidder and next lowest bidder, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator /0 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION SHOREWOOD PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY SHOREWOOD MN 55331 APRIL 8, 1992 Rochon $684,500 Penn-Co Construction, Inc. 702,468 Faulkner Construction Inc. 712,000 "- K M Building Company Inc. 712,700 . Maertens-Brenny Construction Co. 714,000 Fulco Construction 715,900 Merrimac Construction 717,113 Frerichs Construction Company 718,000 The Builders, Inc. 722,000 C. O. Field Company 723,620 . " George W. Olson Construction Co '736,200 Arkay Construction 767,000 Professional Cqnstruction Ser, Inc 779,950 EXHIBIT A A Eos ARCHITECTURE . . 21 \\'ATER STREET E\CELSIOR. \ll\\ESOTA 55331 F\.\ 612-~7~-392S 6l2-~7+)291 April 9, 1992 Ms. Barb Brancel, Mayor City Council Members City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 RE: Public Works Facility Eos #91129 Dear Mayor Brancel and Council Members: Eos is very pleased to inform you of a most successful bid opening yesterday for the above referenced project. Clearly, the current market conditions favor the Owner. We attach hereto a copy of the bid results as compiled by your staff. Also attached is the revised budget for your review. Please note that the "remaining available funds" estimate exceeds $60,000 as compared to a deficit of $26,000 indicated in our March 4, 1992 correspondence. In addition, we have interviewed the apparent low bidder in person at City Hall, and later by telephone and have been assured that they are comfortable with their bid and are anxious to begin work. In the light of the above, we consider the bidder to be responsive and responsible, and therefore recommend the Council award the project to: Rochon Corporation, Suite 110 6900 Wedgwood Road Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 For a contract amount of $ 684,500.00 Our office intends to be represented at the April 13th Council meeting to answer any questions you may have. Once again, we thank you for the opportunity to work with the City of Shorewood, and look forward to a successful construction phase of the project. Very truly ~\~d ~\\ J. Nicholas RueW, AIA President Enclosure JNR:km EQl'AL OPP()Rl1~ITY E\IPLOYER A Eos ARCHITECTURE . . REVISED BUDGET PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY, SALT/SAND STORAGE BUIlDING AND RElATED ADDmONAL ITEMS April 9, 1992 Public Works Building Construction Cost $684,500 147,800 50,000 65,000 2,000 10,000 4,000 10,000 30,000 15,000 3,710 3,000 14,250 7,030 $ 1,046,290 $ 1,106,712 $ 60,422 Salt/Sand Storage Building Cost (incl. additional Storm Sewer) Contingency Architectural/Engineers Fees Soils Testing Furniture & Equipment Legal Landscaping (Trees) Dirt Removal Soils Correction N.S.P. Charges Signage -. Security Fence (Chain Link) 950 L.F. Hook-up Charges to To~ka Bay.: TOTAL COST ESTIMATE AVAILABLE FUNDS REMAINING FUNDS MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 FROM: Mayor and City Council ~ L j James C. Hurm, city Administrator April 7, 1992 7;\ I'" MEMO TO: DATE: RE: Adjustment in Archtectural Fees for the Public Works Facility . On March 24,1992 the Public Works Facility Architects Selection Committee, consisting of Bob Gagne, Don Zdrazil, Brad Nielsen and myself, met with Nick Reuhl, of EOS Architecture to discuss their request for additional architectural fees. EOS's records indicate that the cost of time through March 20, 1992 was $35,603. The agreement for services is for billing on an hourly basis not to exceed $37,000. The building being bid is 17,398 sq. ft., a 34% increase in size from the original estimate. . In addition to the increase in size of the building the design of this project has become somewhat more complex because of a number of factors. First the Public Works building is the second of two phases. The first: the salt/storage building was designed by OSM and is not yet completed. EOS worked with OSM on determining and adjusting grades during the grading process. The EOS contract was based on designing a building on a'flat site with grading having been determined. There were ,a number of other factors which complicated the process, such- as requirements of the American Disabilities Act, timing-of the decision on which direction both water and sewer will come from, consideration of placing an ambulance and fire bay in Public Works facility. Due to the increased size of the building and to the various factors listed above it is the consensus of the Selection Committee that, in good faith, an increase of $7,064 should be authorized by the City Council for architectural services for the Public Works facility. This is 6% of the difference between the March 4, 1992 building cost estimate and the earlier cost estimate of $620,000. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I I . . Memo to Mayor and city Council Re: Public Works Facility Page Two It should be noted that the latest cost estimate included an even higher amount for architectural and engineering services. It should be further noted that even with this additional amount, architectural fees will still be almost $16,000 less than the next lowest bid in the bid process back in July of 1991. Recommended Action: Motion. to authorize an increase in architectural fees for the Public Works facility of $7,064 for a total of $44,064. JCH.al A Eos ARCHITECTCRE . . 21 \IATER STREET EXCELSIOR. \ll\\ESOn 551.11 F.\\ 612--1:-1-3928 b12--I--t-3291 :-:-0 2 5 !CO? j,-..:.... February 20, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 RE: Public Works Facility Eos # 91129 Dear Jim: Based on the meeting held this date at City Hall regarding subject project between yourself, Brad Nielson and Mr. Zdrazil of the City of Shorewood, Mr. Dresel of O.S.M, and Gordy Metcalf representing Eos Architecture, it is Eos' understanding that the "Design Development" documents presented (the drawing by Eos and Gausman & Moore) were approved as presented with certain minor exceptions. It is Eos' intent to now complete the Construction Documents in order to meet the schedule of presenting final plans and spe~ifications to the Council on March 9, 1992, for the purpose of receiving Council approval to advertise the Project for bids. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, - .' o MCfUhyUJU()... J. Nicholas Ruehl, AlA JNR:km EQlAL OPPORll:iITY DIPLOYER A Eos ARCHITECTURE . . .'.\-..... PROJECT fiLE 21 \\:\TER STREET EXCELSIOR. ~ll\\ESOn 55331 FAX 612-~-~-.i928 bI2-~-~-3291 January 20, 1992 Mr. James Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood Minnesota 55331 RE: Public Works Facility EOS # 91129 Dear Jim: In December, the City Council approved the concept program and preliminary budget for the Public Works Facility. As we discussed earlier, the project has increased significantly from the original program that was the basis for our proposal to the City last August. We based our fees for services on proposed construction costs of $620,000. We used a 6% fee for the services outlined in the contract. Since the building cost outlined in the budget for the project is $759,701.00, we respectfully request our fees be adjusted proportionally. This would represent an amount of $8,382.00 be added to the original amount of $37,000.00 to total $45,382.00. The adjustment in fees was included in the cost estimate, as we preliminarily discussed the significant scope change in December. If this is acceptable to you, please sign both copies and attach one to your copy of the agreement. Please return the other to me for our records Thank you very much. We 'are continuing to refine the d~sign to the benefit of the project. Very truly yours, ~~ J. Nicholas Ruehl, AlA accepted by: JNR:km EQlAL OPPORll;>;ITY D1PLOYER -~ -'( MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council _ . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 11 March 1992 RE: Waterford III - Preapplication for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment FILE NO.: 405.(92.02) BACKGROUND . Ryan Construction Company has arranged to purchase a. portion of the property included in the third phase of the Waterford P.U.D. (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) from Trivesco, Inc., subject to their being able to obtain approvals from the City for a revised development plan. They propose to reduce the portion of the site devoted to twinhomes, in order to increase the commercial portion of the site. The enlarged commercial area would consist of four sites, the largest of which would be occupied by a Byerly's grocery store/drug store/retail complex. The three other sites would be developed as: -1) a fast food restaurant with drive-up ~indow; 2) a drive-in bank; and 3) a day care facility. Their proposal is explained in detail in their "Concept Narrative Submission for Neighborhood Retail Center", dated 26 February 1992, attached. The proposal differs considerably from what has been approved to date. As a consequence the request involves not only an amendment to the P.U.D. agreement but also an ._ amendment to the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan amendment is what is being considered atthis time. Exhibit B provides a comparison of the current proposal with the approvals granted to date. The process for amending Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan is outlined in detail in the "Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guidelines" which were adopted by the City in 1983. (Complete copies of the Guidelines are forwarded herewith to the Planning Commission, Council and staff.) Amending the Comp Plan involves a three-step procedure: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore \~ . 1) application conference between developer and staff; 2) preapplication and, 3) formal application. The developer has submitted information for ~e preapplication stage of the process. r PREAPPLICATION ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY CITY STAFF The Waterford P.U.D. has been a complex and oftentimes controversial project since its inception in 1984. Based upon the history of the project the staff has raised the following concerns: A. Land Use. The proposed commercial use is considered to be more intense than what has been approved for the site or discussed in the past. To put it in perspective, the approved plan relates closest to our C-1, Neighborhood Convenience Commercial District, (while the Ryan proposal is more similar to a C-3,General Commercial District). The proposed change in use raises the following issues: 1. Change in architectural character and scale. 2. Increased hardcover ~ . 3. Increased traffic, 4. Increased hours of operation .. While there is undoubtedly some appeal to a Byerly's operation, staff cautions against trying to specify a particular owner if the project is to go forward. Despite P.U.D. being one of the most powerful zoning tools, tying approvals to a certain retailer is highly questionable. If the City feels the project has merit, emphasis should be placed on determining how a Byerly's differs from an ordinary grocery store, then develop performance standards to be included into a development agreement. The developer proposes only to develop the northerly two-thirds of the site, leaving a question as to how the remaining eight acres will be developed. This piece-meal approach is contrary to the whole concept of planned unit development. Any formal application should address how this part of the site will be used. - 2 - . . \ ' B. Transportation/Traffic. The developer agrees that his proposal will generate more traffic than the plan which has been approved. In addition to more traffic, it is likely that traffic will be drawn up from the south which would not have come there otherwise. For example, Chanhassen/Eden Prairie residents would not go up to Highway 7 for a convenience store when one is already located on Townline Road and Highway 101. They may, however, come up to a Byerly's store. The developer responds to this concern by providing alternatives for how Old Market Road intersects with Highway 7. These alternatives apparently are intended to discourage traffic on Old Market Road but may shift additional traffic to other streets (e.g. Vine Hill Road). The alternative road designs raise other questions: 1. How might the changes affect the funding of road construction by MNDOT? 2. Will changing Old Market Road make it ineligible for MSA funding? 3. Have cost estimates been done on changing the road alignment? 4. Does the developer intend that the City participate fmancially in changing the road configuration? While the developer's traffic projections are useful on a" preliminary basis, more detail is necessary to determine the impact of this proposal on local neighborhoods. The staff strongly suggests that a more detailed study be prepared by an independent traffic consultant to examine how much difference there is between the existing plan and the current proposal. In addition to volume the study should examine how traffic circulation in the area may be affected. The cost of this study should be paid by the developer. Regardless of whether road alignments get changed or not, the City should make it clear to the developer that the City can not afford to lose any of the state aid money being contributed to the project -currently under construction. · C. Park Dedication. If none pf the residential units get built the City stands to lose as much as $39,000 in park dediCation fees. If the project is to go forward it should be with an understanding that the developer will be responsible for these lost fees. D. Drainage. As a result of the increased hard cover, drainage for the site will have to be reexamined. Detailed stormwater runoff calculations should be presented with a formal amendment application. E. Tax Increment Financing. Any formal application for this proposal must evaluate how it may impact the current tax increment financing. The City Attorney should be directed to review this from a legal perspective and the City bond consultant should review the financial implications. Information should be provided comparing the tax base generated by the current proposal versus the existing plan. - 3 - \. . F. Formal Application. - If the developer proceeds with a formal application, the fees currently required by the City are anticipated to be inadequate to cover City expenses. The City should attempt to estimate what the cost of reviewing the proposal will be -- and require sufficient escrow to cover those costs. j Our current zoning regulations require that public hearing notice be sent to everyone within 500 feet of the site. As part of the 1989 public hearing process on the existing plan, the Council directed staff to send legal notices to everyone 500 feet north of the site and to all residents south of Highway 7, between Christmas Lake and Vine Hill . Road. The Council should- advise staff as to how far it wants to notify residents. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS - - If the City feels the developer's proposal has merit and the developer decides to pursue a formal Comprehensive Plan Amendment and revision to the current P.U.D., much information will be necessary in order to make a decision: 1. The developer must address how the entire third phase of the project will be developed, not just the northerly two-thirds. 2. The City'~should determine specifically what sets Byerly's apart from other grocery stores, then develop performance standards to - be incorporated into a development agreement and protective covenants. 3. The City should commission an independent traffic study to determine the impact of the proposal on traffic volumes and circulation patterns. The cost of the study should be borne by the developer.' 4. The City should advise the developer that the project should pose no financial risk to Shorewood (Le. loss of state aid money necessary to pay for the existing project). . .. 5. The developer I!lust make up any lost park dedication fees which may result from his project. - 6. A formal application should include stormwater runoff calculations to determine how much ponding is necessary on the site. 7. A formal application should evaluate tax base for the proposal. The City Attorney and bond consultants should be directed to review the legal and financial implications relative to the current tax increment financing. 8. Staff should be directed to estimate the potential costs .of ~eviewing the-formal application and P.U.D. revision. Based on the estimate, the developer should be required to post a sufficient escrow to cover the City's expense. - 4 - . . 9. The City Council should direct staff as to how far it wants public hearing notices sent to residents. - BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Dave Sellergren AI Rolek Steve Dzurak William McHale Richard Koppy -, Randy Travalia \ - 5 - I ;-----..- -' -' 3! <J: ~ z o ~ w Z .. NDt'{-h I I ": 1000 ~ ;: KING SWOOO TEJ1 !Yo (j /~~y CHANHASSEN Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Waterford III - Proposed Comp Plan Amendment , \ ....- ro V'J o o H ~ o U ~ o ...... +-' U ~ H ~ V'J .8 f:: ro .~ f:: ro ....- ~ ]]]]] o 0 :>-. ~~~~~] ~ g.;:l;:l;:lg.<n 2 <ng'g'g'<n~ 'r 00000 ~ ~ 000001:: bll o~ V) V) 0 o~ ....... .S 01 ~ ~ ~oo 0 <n OO~~OOO\.: :::l :::I f3 ,-... .D i::' .e- ~ ~ ~ -a 8 g.g 0"0 .!?;9 ..1::....... 0 ~ 0 ~ :E 8 ~ ~ .S "0 g 1-<2080..1:: ........g ..+JtI]==,cuC::~ 'f] ~ ~ ~ B ~ bll , GJ's N ~ ~ I ~. ~ o~ ~ 8 <n "0 ~ 8 -... +-J ~;;:l bll 1-4 "0 3 0 ....... 0 bll <n 0 0 0 ~o -... ..... .D o.~ 8 ~ t':l~~.g~ c<n 0"0 ~ "O-o.D ...... ......oca.......oo 'E- 0 s ~'S e ~ g.o bO.D 0.. o .Q " ~.D ;:l ca I-< ~ .5 2 0 o 0 "::l........::I bO ~ 0.. ....... o tl.~ :>-'.1j ~ 0 .. l=O t':l 0 0 l-<"'I-<"'O.......O.......~ObO bll "'"" "0 "0 ....... ..... "0..1:: l=O <n '" ~ ..c:..... bll 0 "0 0 .... o <n'- 0 0 b)) - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ..2 ~ ..... o ..c: '1:: I:: .~ <n .D t':l 0 ~ ................................... ~ p:; "9SI-< ;:l .M.M .~ .~ .M .~ ....... 'S o..~ 0.. ~~;;:I 0.. 00'" "::l<n"O ooooo~ 0 00"0 I:: '" 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 g ..:..; .:..; 0 bObllO:::l:::l :::I 0 '" t':l 3~~ ~~g.g.~1-< U .....~~ 0.- 0 <n <n <n <n <nca B 0'- .- ~.D 0 0 0 0 0 '::1 Ob g ..... 0.. ~~o~ 88~~~5 0\ ~SSS B ~ ~.~ ~~ N~ ~~ v) ..0 :g ...... ~ rd rd 8- .~ .8 ti 01 - ~ ~ ~ 0..0 0 0 ~ g c -g . ,I-<'~ 0 C?, C?, g 0'- 0 t':l : ~....... '15 \0 t- 0 ~Bg"""'] "~o ~ <n<n~""'" "0 0 ~ ~ ~ ' gp bll~ ~ ~ .~ ~.~ ~o I-<o;:l gb ~ cD ~ 0 0 0.;;:1 .S ~.5 ~ ~ ..... 0 '" d3;:l .- :9 ] 0 r:l o.!::l :s ..... .~" ....... 'r 0 0 ..I:: 0 r:l El ,,; >. 0 <n I:: <n._ ..... ~ "0 ..... >< 0 0 bll 0 0 en ~ l=O .- 0 ~ .ll>_ bll ;:l :a ll>;,:l "::l 0...... .- 0 0 0 . "0 o'S 0 5.D :::::: 1-4 ;:l I:: bll bll <n .- I-< bll 0.. .. <n I-< 0 :>-'0' ....... "'.D.... 0 0 o~ <n 0:>-'0 ":: 0 .... > :-'~ > ..... 0"" ,... 0 - 0.-.... 0 0 ...... .- 0 ... '"' ....... ........... "::l..... 0 <n 0.. 0 > ..... ..... 0 '0 0'1:: g g :s S a ~.1j ~ B .. '" :::l .~ 0 S..I:: .. ~"'tio"'""0.D0.D"OB~<n~~gr:l8~~8 S 01 -5 "0 .~o"o 0 's ~t-rd .DU~ ~a~B8~1 o u . "<t o ..... ,-... ca o o ..... bO o I-< .D ;:l <n I-< o .e- ..... I:: ;:l El El o o v .... ......, 0.. ;:l , o > ><'1:: ~"O o..~ El ..... 8 ~ ~ o o o bll p::: .. <n '; ~ .0 ~ ~ .. E~ .~ S ..... <n o U . rd.ou~ ....- ro :> o H ....- ro f:: .- ~ ~ 0\ 0\ ~ 'Q) B g 0 . ~ ll>~ 5 ca > 0 o <n 8 ll>~ "0 .S ao15 "Obo8 15~ca ..c: 0..... I-< 0> "E: 200 ~ bO:g <n ..... 0 ~.~ 0:;:: I-< 0.... bll o,-=: "5 ~ ti .5 ~.D3 g. .- 0 ~ 0 """'vfdOVlll> : O@......."Obll ~=..I::Na~ .....00 '......bll 's ~ "::l ..... o'~ ._ ;:l I:: ..c: 0 ......~:::Ibll "0 : tI)........~ tI) d) ..., 0 ~ ~ .~ :::l 00....... 0 '"'0..... ...1:: b g6"@ ~ S-g 0\\0",800 Q) u C o U ~ 00 0\ ~ .. - '" .0 ~ ~ o U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..., o I-< g 00 bll o :~ S <n' 0 o I-< S....... o 0 ~ ~ .- :::I ~ 0 ........g ~ 0 tI) '" '"' <n ..... 0 0 =.D.a Q)8-g :sa ;:l lC 0 ..... ~~g '-- ..... ..., ~Oll> ~ 0 0 E3;:l"o "'~ca ~ I-< VI Q) :>-. 0 -",0.. .9' El 8 '::: 0.. :::I ~ . ,.. ,-... ..., o 6 o ..I:: I:: VI .~ a ~~::r: t-.~ :>-. ..N~"O e; '-'.~ cO ....~g..c: 1= 'S 4-< V'J ~;:lcas ..... ~ 0 0 lC V) .0 .t: ~~~~ j>,.... I-< g ~ ~ ~.D E3 ..., I-< GJ '" ~ 0 ..., ~OO"'" ~;:~.2 0.. . l=O E~8~ :E... VI ..... ..I:: bll .- ll> ..c: bll o .... "0 ...... ..... :::I .D "0 a ,-... VI VI .gp~ ~VI:ogVl:>-' ~ 'E .';:: 00 ~ ~ s::l ;:l 5 :>-...... ..c: Q) -...... VlV'J "t:l~NI-<OO 'iij "<t ..... 3 "0 ....... 0)..... , VI....... ~~e~ 15~ .- >- I:: 1-4 '" ~>. ~ .-8' 0 0 i5 . .tI) i:: ...-..:0 tI1 o 0 VI t':l ....... ~ t) "O.~ bO 0 J, '" I-< 0 I-<.Q Q)C1\ll>.......0 -a . ~ VI 0..0 .......... 001.....0 .::N............,..c:...... ':::I ~ . . . . ~' I-< B VI o I-< ll> .D o ....... 3 .... <n ....... o 1-4 o 6 o o ....... VI ~ ..I:: 1:: o o c ii~ s::l 0 ~ 0 ';:lo.. Q) ~ . "0 ~ o ....... VI ~ ll> .D B ll> ....... .- <n ....... o 1-4 o 6 o o ~ ..c: 1:: o o o ii~ c: 0 ~ 0 ';:lo.. o '~ . "0 ~ o ..... VI ~ o .D o ....... VI ~ o ..... .- VI ....... o 1-4 o '6 o o .... VI &'j -€ o c o .- -B"O = 0 ,g 0 ....0.. Q) ~ . "0 a ~ 8 o ..... ll> :::I "0 VI ll> ..... VI ::l ~ 0 0.."0 , 1-43 Ba:> '" 0 ...... .5 ~ o'd) 0.D ~ ~ I-< ~ VI ~o"O &'j a ~~ o 0 -< ~ OJ (5 z Exhibit B DEVELOPMENT COMPARISON SUMMARY 1984 Concept Plan, 1991 Final Plan. Current Proposal ~. . .' \ . < FilE COpy February 26, 1992 CONCEPT NARRATIVE SUBMISSION for: NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL CENTER of Shorewood Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan Amendment PREPARED FOR: ' CITY OF SHOREWOOD Jim Hurm, City Administrator 5755 Country Oub Road " Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 " DEVELOPER: RYAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 900 Second Avenue South 700 International Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 PREPARED BY: 922 Mainstreet Hopkins. Mn. 55343 (612) 933-Q972 fax: (612) 933-TI53 . rill" \...ASSOCIATES LTD. 922 Mainstreet '\ Hopkins. Mn. 55343 (612) 933-0972 fax: (612) 933-1153 ../ :e .. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT GUIDELINES Section 3. - REQUIRED INFORMATION A. Pre-Application Stage 1. Narrative This pre-application submittal by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. is for a proposed grocery and drug store anchored neighborhood retail development to be located . at the southeast quadrant of Old Market Road and Minnesota State Hwy. 7. Our goal is to receive direction from the City Council as to how this proposal will be received by the community. It is our intent to present this plan according to the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. and the PUD concept submittal process so that the full scope of the proposal is known. This narrative document, in conjunction with the Figures, Plan sheets, descriptions and traffic analysis, will identify the intent and . impact of the proposal. Figure 1. identifies the site location within the City of Shorewood. . The site is located west of Vine Hill Road and on the south side of Hwy. 7, at the proposed Old Market Road interchange. The site is currently identified as a Commercial and Medium Density zoned property within a larger PUD. Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Developer, is proposing to amend the existing "Trivesco" PUD and Comprehensive Land Use Plan and develop the property. as depicted in the attached site plan package. Figure 2. identifies the Existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the subject property. Figure 3. identifies the 13.6. acre commercial. area necessary for the proposed development. " This application is for the northern 2/3 of the Trivesco Waterford 3rd Addition parcel for which the Developer is proposing a 63,000 sf grocery store, a 19,000 sf drug store anchored r~ store and three Outlots for retail/commercial site development. This amendment to the Comprehensive Plan slightly enlarges an existing commercial district, reduces the amount of medium density townhouses, and offers alternatives to the alignment of Old Market Road. Background The original "Trivesco" PUD was approved in 1984 by the City and consisted of a mixture of single family homes, street systems, and multi-family/commercial development along Hwy. 7. The "Trivesco" PUD identified 60,000 to 80,000 sf of retail and multiple family dwellings on the subject parceL Figure 4 identifies the original PUD site Plan. The single family homes were built since 1984. None of the commercial or multi-family housing have been built to date. · Civil Engineering · Transportation . Infrastructure Redevelopment . Landscape Architecture . Construction Management Page Two :: In June of 1991, the City approved the final plat of the Waterford 3rd Addition which also amended the original 1984 PUD. Exhibit B of the Waterford ill Development Stage Plan was incorporated to the revised PUD. Exhibit B, as shown on Figure 5, identified a commercial retail area, drive-in bank, office building and day care facility, and 54 townhome units. Currently the site is platted as Waterford 3rd Addition. The proposed neighborhood retail development will occupy approximately 13.6 acres of the 21.5 acre Waterford 3rd Addition. The Developer does not control the remaining 7.9 acres, and as such, this submission does not address its future uses. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment . a. The site is directly adjacent to Minnesota State Hwy. 7 which carries 34,500 vehicles per day (1990 AADT, MnlDOT). Old Market Road is being developed in conjunction with a Frontage Road System to have a full movement signalized interchange to Hwy. 7. It is projected that the majority of the vehicle traffic will utilize Hwy. 7 as their access to this commercial area. The visibility and access from H wy. 7 suggests the market for a viable commercial district be modified and expand the existing commercial Land Use Area. b. It is stated in Land Use planning documents that commercial land uses are most critical in terms of location and accessibility. This is true as it applies to retail development and retail businesses which .live and die on accessibility, visibility, and other locational criteria. . The proposed use is supported by the Comprehens'ive Planned Community Structure concept, and, more specifically, the driving neighborhood concept. With grocery shopping being the primary focus of neighborhood retailing, the proposed commercial development reinforces this concept. Additionally, under the driving neighborhood concept, neighborhood center areas are to be designed to promote visual identity and provide convenience. This is most appropriate for the retail uses, and will be most applicable to our particular site with its extremely high visibility from State Hjghway 7. - c. The proposed commercial land use expansion would move this land use south . There will remain a 7.9 acre parcel of 100 to 230 feet in depth not included in this Comprehensive Plan Amendment (please refer to Figure 6). The depth of this remaining parcel depends on which roadway alternative is to be utilized. d. The proposed 63,000 sq. ft. grocery and 19,000 sq. ft. drug store anchor retail building as shown on the site plan will simplify the services and provide a quality retail option which currently does not exist for this area of Shorewood. The viability of a commercial node requires an anchor tenant to draw customers to this site. With the visibility and access from Highway 7 it is anticipated customers will be generated from a 1-3 mile radius. Page Three e. The proposed commercial area will be at the expense of a multiple or twin home residential land use. There has not been any development of this multiple family land use on the site since the 1984 PUD inception. The proposed expansion of the commercial district as shown will be a benefit for the neighborhood and City versus leaving the land sit vacant in a multiple family land use designation. Demonstrate that the new classification would be the highest and best use of the site. What is the public need or community benefit? . a. The Minnesota Real Estate Textbook Second Edition, written by Richard Larson and Bruce Harwood (that textbook used for educating real estate professionals in the licensing process in Minnesota), defines "highest and best use" as "that use of a parcel of land which will produce the greatest current value". The site generates the highest and best use when developed as a quality retail facility that has architectural characteristics that are coordinated in style, massing and color. At the same time, it takes full advantage of the high degree of visibility and accessibility of the site. With the proposed development of a quality grocer and neighborhood retail center, one can only conclude that the highest and bets use for this land is retail in nature. Any other .type of use would not take full advantage of the sites' locational characteristics, and therefore would not be the highest and best use. 2. General Information a. Landowner - on the application form . b. Applicant's Name: Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. 700 Interi1ational Centre 900 Second Avenue S.. . Minneapolis, MN 55402 , c. Consultant - Civil E~gineering, Lahdscape Architecture,Planning: RLK Associates, Ltd. 922 Mainstreet - Hopkins, MN 55343 1 d. The current landowner has been apprised of this proposal and has submitted a letter to the City of Shorewood stating their support of this proposal. Page Four 3. Present Status a. The legal description is on the application form. Generally the legal description is the northern two-thirds of the Waterford 3rd Edition plat. b. The existing zoning classification is PUD. Figures 2 and 3 indicate the land use surrounding the subject property. c. Existing development. Please refer to Plan Sheet 2 - Existing Conditions and Plan Sheet 3 - Boundary Survey/Plat for the current status of the site. . 4. Site Conditions The 13.6 acre site of the proposed development consists of a rolling topography, steep slopes and an overstory of deciduous trees. The topography and steepness of some of the slopes suggest this site has been altered in the past. The existing trees are indicative of invader species which established themselves well in a distributed site. The lack of space between the individual trees and similar age of the elm, ash, boxelder, poplar and willow also are indicative of a site which has experienced disruption in the past. The existing areas of tree cover have been highlighted on Plan Sheet 2 - Existing Conditions. a. - c. Plan Sheet 2 identifies the existing contours and location of lowland areas within 300' of the site. The drainage patterns on the site generally flow to the North and East toward the identified lowland. . . d. Location of existing utilities are shown on Plan Sheet 5 - Concept Utility Plan. There will not be any adverse impact on the existing utility systems for the City of Shorewood. '. , Stormwater , The majority of the site is scheduled to drain to the east and into .a stormwater retention pond located south of Outlots 2 and 3. Eventually, the stormwater will be directed to the north mto an existing 18" cmp pipe running under Highway 7. The sizing of this pond.will be coordinated with the final roadway alignment, and will meet City and Watershed District design standards. Outlot 1 will flow to the ponds created between Highway 7 and the Frontage Road. These two ponds on both sides of Old market Road were designed with the concept of the commercial site utilizing a stormwater retention pond as shown. Sanitary Sewer The site will be serviced from an in-place 9" main which runs parallel with Hwy.7. ," Page Five Water Both domestic and fire protection water sources are available from an in-place 12 "main along Old'Market Road. Necessary hydrants and looping of the main will be done. Please refer to the Concept Utility Plan Sheet 4 for a layout of the existing and proposed utilities. e. Transportation There are two transportation issues associated with this proposed commercial development: (1.) Projected traffic volumes. (2.) Alignment of Old Market Road Projected Traffic Volumes . A traffic analysis has been completed which reviewed the anticipated traffic volumes from the proposed development and the anticipated traffic volumes from the 1991 Trivesco PUD. The traffic analysis is attached and a standardized traffic forecast methodology was applied. Alignment of Old Market Road . The State of Minnesota is currently constructing the Frontage Road and interchange of Old Market road at State Hwy. 7. Figure 7 identifies the roadway segments currently under construction. The underground utilities, road base, and curb and gutter are in place for this new road)Vay, but no bituminous surface has been laid down. The Developer is committed to working with the City, surrounding neighborhood and MnfDOT in order to develop this site and, if necessary, to modify the alignment of the Old Market Road. Preliminary discussions have been held with MnfDOT regarding this issue. The Developer has included four roadway alignment schemes to be discussed. It is Qur intent that at the conclusion of this pre-application process the City, neighborhood and developer will be in agreement as to the future alignment of Old Market Road. 5. Schematic Drawing of the Proposed Site Plan Plan Sheet 1 identifies the proposed site plan without modifying the existing Frontage Road or Old Market Blvd. The site plan is conceptual in nature and identifies the building massing, access and parking arrangement. Architecturally, the building will be developed with quality materials, and a consistency of color and detail will be carried throughout the site. The Developer has a history of, and is committed to providing a unified, high quality development. The Concept Landscape Plan will complement the building architecture which will allow this site to achieve the quality desired by the City and the residents. . .' .. Page Six 6. Change in Residential Dwelling Units The project may reduce the amount of multi-family twin homes from the approved 54. The exact reduction in approved townhome unit will vary depending upon the road alignment or direction from the City. a. - b. Residential Housing - none is proposed c. Open Space - no parks are proposed - a stormwater detention pond is. proposed in the northeast portion of the site - d. Area devoted to streets Dependent on which of the four roadway alignments are chosen, the lineal footage of new streets to be constructed would range from 0 to 1,900. e. Area devoted to commercial uses. The acreage of the site and building square footage is identified on the site plan. 7. Proposed Change in Zoning Classification The current zoning is PUD which would have to be amended, although no zoning change is necessary. .. -... - ~,.--.: ~? i~ ~ /p' ~- - --=;:-'~ {~.,( ".,?, - - ""~ ::" ~! ,Co.' ~~ ~L' /,. -~L fiC:t~..7:: . I ,,/ ,-~ ~ ~:.:::.-~~ ....: .~ ~r '(If ~-=.F' I -'- . ~/' - -l~,~~. ~J~~ It,,,,,,,..=,,-_, _ "~ PROJECT LOCATION ""i .~~ iC: ___-....'11- "-''': D 7 I ~ 'i~ lE~P;iii""i~."... .4=' tP I.r' '-au Mmll~/alllttl ;~ = t e ":. ~ _L I ~ \~~ -if'J) ., ,.' - ~-''; 'I II nG:;~g~~~. ~~~~~(.' .t~~U~ ~~?VJPu, ~- - ,p"1~,d "~W~f""'l'...i{ "'fM~'1PSS--,/)~..:: - ';"\ ~ -gk::=i r ~;II~~ dl '~:;JQ~~ - ~III I m - ~~ i~f :J."'" . 1~\<. - ! ,..j ~ -- ~ B~~~~lV1 ~~". ~~,;~ s....~ ~~ ~ ~ -== ~ ]~~~. . -' .. I~ffjl ~- ~ ~ :=,~.. == ~ -~~~ \5.... ::{ ~~I ..,~. = =:i:/ y".- ~S,. A'._ir 8.. = ~. If;;. . ~\. ILl;':' 1..1. - ''':.4- - =. ~ =-> ,27 -0, ~'- 'I ~.. y ~} ~~= == f~ := -= -= --':f ; I' 1/.,,1 ~~i :.: < ~ .,;~~~\.f'-\ =-r#-.. '. r=. =. --=t! ~t; , = ..,. .... :~L~ ~.~~ulb ~~~J~J':~Ei ~~X~~~ ey-- :.~", r\~~!L ~) ~ .)j-'~l {I ,... ""'~~..::-"" ):ju.&:~~ ""'I~ (~; ~ = O~/~.". 7. ~f:-' [:::" ! ~ l~^\@ S'. 32) e;;ft, . -.J'3 I ~ . ...:- t.s.::= ... ~~ ::t \\ -.~~A-; _.~ ~ t~":'i ' -==- == "L-'- .- " "'lr"lf:i~-g~~:~"':,,",v 3----=- -=- I ="/ .( ~:J ~~~n'r. .~~-- --~~..../ (j~' ~:~~':Jt';"_'L...g,;tElJ \,~~.'1r:- =r;a:-, :\ ~ ~', ~ ~" ~ns" ~~L 'i !. l~..... ~.. ~~. ;~ 'E. - €E?: ~~ Hljl("'~'-"- ~. ':J~!L - ~~'. -!--~ ~ 1 ' g _..' ~-.. ~ ':'~ECll'::::::: ~~'I ~ ~v=..(' ~.~ = == G ~I 1(,. J~ ~~I~-;~'"''''':'~~'':~~;'_''' -1r4="::--<~>~~"'-~ 2j=~~=;~~-;;~';.---';'~=T- :- rCl17>11 :.:: II I.=:-" E - .!..Cu.l:,f : ~ w " OlANHASSEH (~I MAP OF SHOREWCOD H::NNE?IN COUNTY PO? 6.. - ~~~~... ~~ ~-.. - -- = ---- - -= .lSSOOATCS I.TO. 922 Mainsnet Hockins. Mn. , S34:3 (61219~n fax: (6121 933-1153 2/24/92-' Rl'r( PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIG. 1 < . I . I ., I 'I .: ~; . . ~. -...:1 Designated wetland" 1:2] Semirural residential (0-1 unit per acre) . [[[J Low density residential (1-2 units per acre) a Low to medium density residential (2-3 units per acre) "Source: Shorewood Wetlands Map ~Y' 922 MainsIreer Hopkins. Mn. 5S343 (612) 933-0972 ID: (612) 933-1153 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RlF( ASSOCIATES LTC. ... .-... I...... '- I --'. < ." 1 -- I I I , j . . - I . - . _:::~~~:;.~~~.~.~ . -.""- ".=- . _: - -- --- .~. -: :-:.:- - =-- -~ -. :; I '_ =-.= ;...(-j (0 - 11111 1111 . " III~ II iii ~ / ~ I II .. iii Medium density residential (3-6 units per acre) ~ Semipubl ic 1%>3 Publ ic r1@1 Commercial 2/24/92 FIG. 2 I . " ~ I I " I I , I I I , If ~I. ~r:" . :;,,~ ; ~ ~~~l r" 'g I ' Ii : i I ). r i - - m Medium density residential (3-6 units per acre) ~ Semipubl ic . I%)~ Publ ic ~. .....:1 Designated wetland'" IZI Semirural residential (0- 1 uni t per acre) . [llIIJ Low density residential (1-2 units per acre) 8 Low ta medium density residential (2-3 units per acre) .Saurce: Shorewood Wetlands Map tft{] Commercial [~~J 922 Mainslreet Hcplcins. Mn. 5343 (6121 933-0972 !ax: (6121933-1153 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 2/24/92 FIG. 3 "-- ...... -, .' -, .: i . . - ....- .- "', , , , ., , I . " .... .'::-=-;'/;01 .,.... .. . ".0 ::.:_. /.. ..' .. ... -....- --- " .. ".." .. / .. .. ,. .. ." . ".. ...- - . -- .. ., 41' ----.... .... :' " ---=-_-:.- , C a:: INTERSECTION TREATMENT ,. ..~ ,~-~~~;;. VINE HILI. ROAD A~ COVIHGTON ROAD" f~ = ..-.....- ~OClAI;S '-TO. 922 Mainslreer Hockins. Mn. S343 (6121 ~ tax: (6121 933-1153 2/24/92' Rll{ 1984 TRIVESCO P .U.D. FIG. 4: . ASSOOAiCS LTD. 922 MainSlreet Hockins. .IAn. 55.14:3 (6121 933-09n tax: (6121 933-115:1 1991 AMENDED SITE PLAN WATERFORD 3rd ADDITION 2/24/92 RlK FlG. 5 . if .....) /'" V; of" // ~' "...., 1 . :t o. I .r ~~ ., ~ -, - " I I /'- '..r-' ~ -, )-. \ I \ 0,1 I I: ~ \ ! ;J I \.. .. .' . ..... .,... ., ~ ~. . .... .-- :: _" :; I .__.... .,. i ~ I ~'~H: ,,~ I EB .... M'FX. SCMS r-5OCT RlK 922~ HcClOnS. MIl. ~ 2/24192 ASSOcaT"";S L.7U. (6'~ ;~-.19i'2 tax: (6'~ ;.....11 c., SITE CONTEXT MAP AG.6 . . .. / (X.c-z R4-7 RiO-l It. I X4-Z\ frX4-2 rR4:7 , , fA... SOLIO''wMIT~ STlUPE ... 'wHITE SKIP STRIPE I 'h-SOL10 TELLO- STII.PE..........-.,,3-3 a::: .}, ~ -:r--- -__ ----"'--, . ---r . . . . ~--._._._._._._~-~.. .,. \"RS-34: R8-3 R8-3a .1 . 4-!0I.10 ";'lTt .' I'" . 1 " 'I . '.. '.~' .. NOTES: . ALL CURB & GlJ I I'=H HAS BEEN INSTALlED. . BffiJMlNOUS ~ACING HAS NOT BEEN ~TALLED. ASSOCIATES lTC. 922 Mainsrreet Hoclcins.. Mn.. S5343 (612) ~ fax: (612) 9:33-11;:; 2/24/92 ' Rlf( MnDOT ROAD ALIGNMENT FIG. 7 . . .: . 'p "! 1! '\:!! 'I I ! · '... ~ i I '. I , I I '. '::67 , , T Q h I ~~. . ...~ ~ . ~~ 0 Tl ~I \\ .. .0 . "i fEEt {- II . . '. i . i I I I . I I I i I . I I: ~ ! II 1 . '~ ~~ . ~ .; ~i en (7/ \.1' ! (\ I \ \ ~ \. '-- \ \ \ \. \ ' .\..\ i ,~~ . . __Jd 't .; , .. ! ~ x- l ~ i.6 II. ~{n ~C: Jl . . ilJi !m ~;; i ~f i : u..":! "H' ~ s!: ~ I ~--- "'''- . ~ I!! L~1i -1 ~ !H:, · f liUtl oj .. J, ~ I $-- ~ t, ~ ~ I J I ~m J ~~ ~ ~~ E t t~lj'i'i t;: ~ .,.. .. 00. ~ I . ! i ~~-. - ...,-. .- ---p ~.-':'. .''''";. ... ~ "" NOUAF.J:)O I I I I I . I . j " .. .: . un ! U. ~_ n ill. .;. ;! ~ iI. A"_" _ ..++-I~ l _ I. "\ i~ i "\, !1. -__ \~ - - - - - - - - - - .- :[ ----- -- .- ", ~i r t j ~ I-A t. ~ i i . ~ im f H ~ t --, I I -i \ . I . .../ i\ \ .\ . I i r i t.. C) l.: r ~i_t ~ . , FORECASTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES OF PROPOSED BYERLY'S FOOD srORE AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT AS COMPARED TO ORIGINAL PUD CONCEPT I. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ITE Land Use Code Supermarket 63,000 sq. ft. 850 Retail and Drug Store 19,000 sq. ft. 810 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through 3,500 sq. ft. 834 Drive Through Bank 3,500 sq. ft. 912 Day Care 8,000 sq. ft. 565 PM Peak Hour Volume . Rate % in/% out Enter Exit Total SUl)ermarket - 63,000 sf ATD * * * * * AM peak hr of adj. st.(7-9) 2.01 70/30 89 38 127 PM peak hr of adj. st. (4-6) 10.34 51/49 332 319 651 (1) PM peak hr based on empirical data 211 203 414 (1) Retail and Drul! Store - 19,000 sf ATD * * * * * AM peak hr of adj. st. * * * * * PM peak hr of adj. st. (4-6) 4.8 50/50 46 45 91 east Food w/drive throul!h - 3,500 sf , , ATD 632.12 50/50 1106 1106 2212 AM peak hr of adj. st. (7-9) 55.56 51/49 99 95 194 PM peak hr of adj. st. (4-6) . 36.53 52/48 66 62 128 Drive throu~h bank: - 3,500 sf ADT 265.21 50/50 464 464 928 AM 11.16 56/44 22 17 39 PM 43.63 48/52 73 80 153 Day Care - 8,000 sf ATD 79.26 50/50 317 317 634 AM 15.17 54/46 66 55 121 PM 15.56 46/54 57 67 124 · Data unavailable -2- Summary of PM Peak Hour Volumes (Proposed): Enter Exit Total Supermarket 63,000 332 319 651 Retail and Drug 19,000 46 45 91 F. Food wIDI 3,500 66 62 128 DIBank: 3,500 73 80 153 Day Care 8.000 2. ..Q!.. 124 Total 98,000 sf 574 573 1147 Totals using empirical data: 455 455 910 (1) -, (1) Based on empirical. data collected at an existing Minneapolis/St. Paul suburban same:-name supermarket of comparable size and market demographic area this average ADT of 651, based on the ITE published data, appears high. There is justification, therefore, to reduce this to 414 total pm peak hour trips. II. 60,000 sf _ 80,000 sf COMMERCIAL - Based on PUD requirements and land use split similar to proposed Development and using ITE "Trip Generation" 5th Edition, 1991. ITE Land Use Code Convenience Store w/gas pumps Family Restaurant Retail Strip Bank: with drive through Day Care Office Total 2,200 sf 3,500 sf 19,000 sf 3,500 sf 8,000 sf 23.800 - 43.800 sf 60,000 - 80,000 sf 853 832 810 912 565 , Twin Homes 54 Dwelling Units 230 " PM Peak Hour Volume Rate Convenience Store with gas pumps - 2,200 sf . % in/% out Enter PM peak hour (4-6) 73.05 50/50 81 Family Restaurant (hil!h turnover) - 3,500 sf PM peak hour 16.26 54/46 31 Retail Strip - 19,000 sf PM peak hour 4.8 50/50 46 Exit Total 80 161 26 57 45 91 . r , ~ 't ... r . ~"Io 1/ S /,.;1.. }( . 50\ ;'\ ~ 1, ~o U \'2.0 ~ (( '/..,>0 '/ ( KEY: C)~l~ 250 rROPCY~EO pm \\'?'o\~ PEAK HOUR. VOL.UME \\~\1O 205 OR.IGJNAL. PU 0 pm PEA~ ~OU)2. VOLumE.. . 0/0 . LN6RES~/ E6RE~S B '( Dt~EC.TlCN . 50/0 " ASSOCl:.TES I.TO. 922 MainsIreet Hcckins. Mn. 55343 (612) 933-0972 fax: (Sl2) 933-1153 FULL. De.veLOPMENr TRIP D/~TR.JeUTJON 1-9~ RJM Rlf( RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 125-91, ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1992 WHEREAS, with Resolution 125-91 the City Council adopted a Capital Improvement Budget for the year 1992, which anticipated funding of $382,750 in park improvements during 1992 to come from bonds sold as a result of a referendum election; and WHEREAS, a Park Referendum is not being held in time to construct said park improvements in 1992; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Park fund balance will grow by $26,038 in 1992 from a January 1 balance of $29,162 to a December 31 balance of $55,200; and WHEREAS, the Park Commission has recommended that a grading and excavating project be undertaken in Silverwood Park during 1992. ~ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the 1992 Capital Improvement Budget is amended as follows: Budqet as Adopted Chanqe To Revenues Park Referendum Park Fund $382,750 -0- -0- $55,200 Expenditures Various Referendum Improvements Silverwood Park Grading and Excavation $327,550 $ 55,200 -0- $55,200 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said project budget shall be as follows: ... Engineering and Project Management Miscellaneous Costs and Contingency Grading Excavatiox;t/Seeding.: $ 5,000 5,200 45,000 $55,200 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that should authorized expenditures for said project occur before anticipated Park fund revenues, the general funds will be utilized until Park fund revenues are suff icient to repay the general fund. In such case no other expenditure may be made from the Park fund until the general fund has been reimbursed in full. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 13th day of April , 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator I3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF SHOREWOOD SILVERWOOD PARK CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PK-01-92 Date: 4-06-92 Job No. 92-307 Item Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost 1 Clearing and Grubbing 1.00 LS @ $2,500.00 lAC = $2,500.00 2 Common Excavation (P) 1054 CY @ 2.50 ICY = 2,635.00 3 Pond Excavation (P) 5300 CY @ 6.00 ICY = 31,800.00 4 Common Borrow (CV) (P) 2168 CY @ 6.00 ley = 13,008.00 . 5 Geotextile Fabric 1000 SY @ 1.50 lEA = 1,500.00 6 Silt Fence, Type 1 260 LF @ 2.50 ILF = 650.00 7 Seeding '1). AC @ 1,200.00 I a..c = 600.00 ------------ ESITMATED COST $52,693.00 " . (/ '.. .,. \ . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 904 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE ESTABLISHING A LOCAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 904 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended by repealing 904.18, Subd. 1 through 6, and adding the following: 904.18 Subd. 1 Puroose: The purpose of this Section is to provide for a method to finance the reserved capacity portion of the sanitary sewer system. Revenues will reimburse the sewer utility fund which through debt financed capital improvements, including current capacity and excess or reserved capacity. . 904.18 Subd. 2 Aoolication of provision: This Section shall apply to all lots created by subdivision after the adoption of this ordinance. 904.18 Subd. 3 Local Service Availabilitv Charqe Established: A sanitary sewer service availability charge (LSAC) is hereby established for the right of connecting to the municipal sewer system. Sewer availability charges shall be as follows: Residential buildings of over 4 housing' units Residential buildings with 4 or fewer housing units Nonresidential parcel . 8 LSAC each unit 1 LSAC each unit . 1 LSAC for each 20,000 ~q ft of land area or " portion thereof This charge shall be in addition to any sewer availability charge imposed bY,the Metr~politan Waste Control Commission. The amount of the LSAC shall be established, and shall be amended, from time to time, in City Code Title 1300, License, Permit, Service Charges and Miscellaneous Fees. 904.18 Subd. full by the release of subdivision. 4 PaYment of Charqe: The LSAC shall be paid in developer to the City sewer utility prior to the City Council Resolution approving the Section 2. Chapter 904.03 of the Shorewood City Code is amended to renumber Subd. 14 through 22 to Subd. 15 through 23 and to add a new Subd. 14 as follows: 904.03 Subd. 14 Reserve Caoacitv: That portion of the sanitary sewer collection system which was designed and built in excess of the capacity required at the time of construction intended to accommodate future growth and development. [~ . . section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of April ATTEST: James C. Hurm city Administrator of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota , 1992. Barbara Brancel, Mayor , APR 09 '92 11:38 OSM MPLS, MN P.2 O\U=& ~ WI.. AsSociates.lnc. 2021 East HennBpm Avenue Minm:apolis. MN 55413 612-331-3660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors March 6, 1992 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Cub Road Shorewood, ldN 55331 Attn.: Mr. AI Rolek . Re: 1992 Sewer Access Charges OSM Corom. No. 4590.00 Dear Mr. RoIek: As directed by the City Council, we have been investigating the rate charged for sewer access in the City of Shorewood. This report looks briefly at the existing access charge, and provides a technical basis for an updated sewer access charge. CURRENT SYSTEM OF CHARGING FOR SEWER ACCESS In the early 1970's, a sanitary sewer system was developed City~wide in Shorewood. At that time, the City was no where near fully developed, and it was realized that the existing residents could not, and should not, bear the full brunt of paying for the entire system. . , To provide for cost sharing with future hook-ups, the City established'a "Sewer Equalization Charge" (access charge) with three fee ranges based on lot size. The three basic charges were $300 for lots less than 15,000 square f~t (sf) in size, $500 for lots 15-30,000 sf, and $650 for lots larger than 70,000' sf. . To pay for financing costs, interest to the date of payment was added to the basic charges. It has been City policy to allow the applicant to amortize the access charge to the original bond defeasance date, which expired in 1989. Because the original bond has now been completely defeased, the City is looking for a fair way of charging new applicants for access to the City's sanitary sewer system. The remainder of this report looks at methods commonly used for setting these fees. r;qual Oppor[Unlly Employer APR 09 '92 11:39 OSM MPLS, MN P.3 SUGGESTED SYSTEMS OF CHARGING FOR SEWER ACCESS By AdjustinK The Old Rate For Time Using the old average rate of $500.00 at simple interest of 7% for 22 years yields a rate of $1,270.00. If you consider the economic life of the sewer to be 80 years, then only 72% of the sewer's value remains; seventy-two percent (72%) of $1,270.00 is about $930. This method has the advantage of being very compatlble with previous rates, and would probably be considered fair by most people for that reason. By Considerlna The Cost Of A New Sewer . If the unimproved lots had to extend a new sewer past their home, the cost estimate would be computed using data as follows: Thirty dollars ($30) per centerline foot for new sewer (construction); Using an average lot size of 100 front feet; With lots OD both sides of the road; And only 72% of a new sewer's economic life remaining. Then the cost would be computed as follows: $30 X 100 feet J 2 Lots per foot X 72% = $1,080 This method has the advantage of a direct comparison with today's costs. It is, however, difficult to estimate the average lot size, and may be difficult to defend due to the assumptions used. . " " RECOMMENDATIONS Keeping in mind that we are trying to. find a simple, fair method of computing access fees, it is our opinion that a flat residential fee of $1000.00 can be used. It is roughly the average between an adjusted previous rate and the cost of providing a new sewer. To adjust for commercial or multi-residential use, multipliers from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's "Service Availability Charge Procedures Manual (1992)" can be used on the residential rate. As this manual can be somewhat involved, it may. be advisable to list simplified multipliers based on data from it. . . APR 09 '92 11:40 OSM MPLS, MN P.4 As always, please call with any questions you may have. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Joel A. Drese}, P .E., L.S. City Engineer . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1300.02, RELATING TO LOCAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE (LSAC) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: section 1. Section 1300.02 of the City Code of the City of Shorewood is hereby amended by adding the following: Local Sanitary Sewer Service Availability Charge (LSAC) 904.18 Subd. 2 $1,000 section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this day of , 1992. Barbara Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 15 HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 417 North Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1309 Phone: (612) 348-6846 FAX: (612) 348-8532 APR - 3 1992 April 2, 1992 . Jim Hurm City cfShore\olOOd 5755 County Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Jim: Mark Heieren from Knutson Services has contacted me to discuss Knutson's request to eliminate drop-off service to the City of Shorewood to reduce their costs. Materials collected at drop-off are often heavily contaminated which. increases labor needed to sort the material prior to marketing. . In previous phone conversations we had discussed how eliminating the drop-off would affect your tonnages and consequently your funding for recycling from Hennepin County. Based on the figures submitted onShorewood's 1991 Final Recycling Report, curbside tonnages alone would be a 20% recycling rate based on 1992 waste generation figures and qualify Shorewood for 80% reimbursement of program expenses by the County. Also, Mark Heieren mentioned that the League of Women Voters operate a drop-off for newsprint. The material collected by their organization could be included with Shorewood's recyclinq tonnages..: If you choose to eliminate the City drop-off, possibly you could promote-the use of the League's drop-off in City newsletters and promotions. If you have questions, please call me at 348-6358. Sincerely, c?~ff?k- ~ Paul M. Kroening 0 Planner, Recycling unit c: Mark Heieren, Knutson Services HENNEPIN COUNTY /qo-! an ~qual opportunity employ~r :rietro Paint-A- TIlon . 12:' \'\"es( FrankUn A...e~lue . RooD1 128 \1inr1t.."apolis, :,Unncsota -55404 . Phone (6 i 2) 370 3(x50 Dear Colleague: 1992 Enclosed you will find a client application for the 1992 Metro Paint-A-Thon. We would appreciate your assistance in helping us find homeowners who might be eligible for the project. You can help us by having interested persons give us a call (870-3660) and we will send them an application and be available to them to answer questions. Otherwise, you could give the application directly to them (in person or by mail). Eligibility requirements and additional information are inside the front cover of the application. . Completed applications need to be in our office no later than May 6th in order to qualify for the 1992 Paint-A-Thon. If you need additional applications at your office, please do not hesitate to call us. Paint-A-Thon is a unique aspect of the Aging Services Division of the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches which serves low-income senior and disabled homeowners throughout the seven-county Metro area. This community partnership is designed to paint the homes of those who are unable to do the work themselves ,and cannot afford to hire a commercial painter. Homeowners who are selected receive a fresh coat of paint on their home at no cost. . We will paint approximately 37.5 homes on August 8, 1992. Thank you in advance for your assistance. 9:~~ung Director Sponsoring OrpniLuions: G..::.w:r .\iinncapoiis CGuncil or Churches. Catholic Chanties of the ,\rchdio'ese of St. Paui and ~HnneJroiis COrpol"JlC Voluntcc:ism Council. Jewish Communi[)' Relations Council/ADL Sl. Paul Area CounCIl of Churches . ~e[ropoH[an Council ~a ~c:m.'y on Aging I ~f)-z -" -...... APR - 6 /992 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 5510/-/634 6/2 29/-6359 FAX 6/2 29/-6550 TTY 6/2 29/-0904 March 24, 1992 \ TO: Mayors of Twin Cities Area Cities We are pleased to send you a copy of the Metropolitan Council's new Regional Transit Facilities Plan, adopted by the Council Feb. 13, 1992. . We believe that the plan's proposals will help maintain a high level of transportation accessibility for the region's cities. The plan calls for improved bus service in urban and suburban areas; light rail transit in one, possibly two, transportation corridors;. and highway lanes reserved for high- occupancy vehicles like buses and carpools. For the first time in many years, the key players in regional transit have reached a consensus, reflected in the Council's plan, about the future direction for transit development in the Twin Cities region. The key players include the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Regional Transit Board, the seven metropolitan counties as regional rail authorities and other groups. . In recent years, public discussion about transit was dominated by disagreements over light rail transit. With all key players working toward the same goal, we believe there's a better chance of dramatically improving transit in the region. . If you'd like additional copies of the plan, we'd be happy to provide them. Please feel free to call the Council's Data Center, (612) 291-8140. . " ~ . MaryF-1L: ~ Chair 1~D3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \:S t == . Human Resources Consulting and Management Seroices April 3, 1992 Ms. Barbara Brancel, Mayor City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Barb: Our forthcoming move to the Seattle, Washington, area makes it necessary for me to resign from the Shorewood Planning Commission effective April 30, 1992, or sooner if preferred. Our home has been sold. Closing and packing are sched- uled for the end of May. It has been a special opportunity for me to be a member of the city's Planning Commission. Much has changed in Shorewood during the past eight years. I only hope that my efforts have in some way contributed to making that change for the better. The people of Shorewood are blessed with'the number of people--elected officials, appointees, volunteers and staff--who devote a lot of time, energy and good think- ing to making Shorewood a great community. In particular, the City should have special apprecia- tion for Brad Nielsen's ,contributions. Brad's techni- cal knowledge and skills', leadership abilities and people skills would be hard to replace. The best of good f<?rtune to. you all as you continue to guide the development'of Shorewood! uly yours, to Schultz cc: ;c~uncil Members V Jlm Hurm Brad Nielsen 5465 Timber Lme Excelsior, ;'v1I'\ 55331 /QA--Z 612/474-3994 RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION URGING CONGRESSMAN GERRY SIKORSKI TO CO-SPONSOR AND SUPPORT H.R. 3560, THE "CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 1991" WHEREAS, Congress must enact cable legislation that protects cable subscribers from unfair cable rates and inadequate cable service; and WHEREAS, H.R. 3560 is the only cable television bill pending before Congress that provides cable subscribers the protection they need from dramatic rate increases, inadequate customer service, and other abuses by the cable operator; and WHEREAS, H.R. 3560 grants franchising authorities the right to entertain competitive bids for a franchise subject to renewal, and gives them the authority to deny a franchise to an inadequate cable operator; and . WHEREAS, H.R. 3560 provides local regulatory cable commissions and local governments the protection they need in any claim challenging local regulation contemplated by applicable federal, state or local law or franchise; and WHEREAS, H.R. 3560 would require the FCC to establish minimum national customer service standards, but would allow the local regulatory cable commission and local governments to continue to tailor standards that may better serve local needs, even if such standards are more stringent than the FCC's ~tandards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Shorewood, that Congressman Gerry Sikorski is hereby requested to co-sign and vote favorably for passage of H.R. 3560 in the Committee on Energy and Commerce and in a full session of the united states Congress. . PASSED AND ADOPTED by. the City Shorewood this 13th day of April, 1992. Council of the ci ty of , Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor " ATTEST: James C. Hurm city Administrator {1A-/ APR - I 1992 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET · EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-5539 March 31, 1992 TO: Barbara Bedell - Minnetonka Beach Dave Callister - Tonka Bay Charlotte Erickson - Minnetrista Brenda Fisk - St. Bonifacius Luvern Hanson - Long Lake Jim Hurm - Shorewood Sandra Langley - Deephaven, Greenwood, Woodland Laura Monroe - Medina Ron Moorse - Orono ~ Patricia OSI!Ionson - Spring Park _ ~ _ If ./ Greg Withers - Excelsior d:fi()'.. IJ t{/yt;~ J' '1 d" YrYf./ 1m Danle s, A mlnlstrator City Council Support of H.R. 3560 . FROM: RE: I have spoken with almost all Cable Commissioners, and ~ explained that I have written a "draft" resolution that would be very influential in once again establishing ~able rate regulation at the Cable Commission level. Congressman Gerry Sikorski holds a key spot on the Committee on Energy and Commerce, that will ultimately refer this legislation to the full House of Representatives. The Cable Commission has two requests that will benefit residents and assist in securing Congressman Gerry Sikorski's vote:' 1. May we schedule five minutes at one of your upcoming City Council meetings? We would like to describe the Cable Commission's request for a resolution ,of support and answer any City Council questions. 2., Would you please include this "draft" resolution language ". wi th any additions or changes you see fit, in the City Council's pack? . As I'm sure you all know, I have fourteen city council:'.s to visit, and I will need your help in making the stop a timed item on the agenda. Thanks, in advance, for your help. If you have any questions, please call me at the Cable Commission office. ' Enclosure cc Barb Brancel, Commission Chair Cable Commissioners CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 19, 1992 PURPOSE 8754 (L) 8755 (G) 8756 (G) 8787-8798 8799 8800 (G) 8801 (G) 8802 (G) 8803 (G) 8804 (G) 8805 (G) 8806 (G) 8807 (G) 8808 (G) .809 (G) 8810 (G) 8811 (L) 8812 (L) 8813 (L) 8814 (L) 8815 (L) 8816 (L) 8817 (G) 8818 8819 (G) 8820 (G) 8821 (G) 8822 (G) 8823 (G) 8824 (G) .825 (G) 826 (G) 8827 (G) 8828 (G) 8829 (G) 8830 (G) 8831 (G) 8832 8833 (G) 8834 (G) 8835 (G) 8836 (G) 8837 (G) 8838 (G) 8839 (G) Mn Dept of Revenue Daniel Randall Wendy Davis are from last list void Wendy Davis James Hurm Metro Waste Control Mn Pollution Contl Agcy Minnegasco, Inc. Mr. Arthur V. Nelson Bradley Nielsen Northern States Power Joseph Pazandak Skill Path, Inc. Waste Management Savage Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Weekly News, Inc. Alan Rolek Void First State Bank Commissioner of Revenue PERA ICMA Retirement Trust City cty Credit union Child Support Enforce. Anoka cty Support/Coll. Cragun's Conf Ctr Govt Training Svc Larkin, Hoffman, Daly.. Anne Latter US West Communications US Postmaster Void PERA Medcenters Health Plan Medica Choice Group Health Inc. League of Mn Cities Mn Mutual Life Commercial Life Ins. Co CONTINUED NEXT PAGE February sales tax Section 125 reimbursement Section 125 reimbursement section 125 reimbursement Mileage Feb SAC charges Hazardous waste workshop utilities Recycling award . section 125 reimbursement utilities Mileage and parks supplies 2 day seminar-J. Hurm Waste removal Liquor purchases Liquor, wine and misc purch Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Wine purchases Advertising Section 125 reimb/mileage/exp Federal/Fica withholding State tax withheld Pera withh9lding Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Conf lOdging-J. Hurm Conf registration-J. Hurm Feb legal fees .general .~devlopmental church rd tif/wtrfd Conference expenses Telephone services Utility billing postage 571. 90 153.00 148.00 370.00 Empee addtl life ins April health insurance April health insurance April health insurance April dental insurance April disability insurance April life insurance -1- AMOUNT 8,449.36 48.00 14.00 66.67 42.56 2,772.00 35.00 822.55 25.00 240.00 1,808.36 40.16 199.00 15.00 1,591.18 5,143.14 2,105.74 1,039.80 346.63 128.00 225.94 5,572.10 923.56 1,901.95 616.28 145.00 89.10 110.59 256.91 155.00 1,242.90 70.09 627.21 375.66 42.00 909.50 4,231.80 1,070.28 422.01 85.50 51. 33 CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CHECKS ISSUED SINCE MARCH 19. 1992 (CONTINUED) PURPOSE 8840 (G) 8841 (G) 8842 (G) 8843 (G) 8844 (L) 8845 (G) 8846 (G) 8847 (G) 8848 (G) 8849 (G) 8850 (G) 8851 (G) 8852 (L) 8853 (L) 8854 (L) 8855 (L) 8856 (L) 8857 (L) 8858 (L) 8859 (G) 8860 (G) 8861 (G) 8862 (G) AFSCME Council 14 City of Excelsior James Hurm ICMA Ken Jarcho Ins Agcy James Lichliter Cellular Telephone Northern States Power Pepsi Cola Company US West Communications WMI Services of Mn Waste Management Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Harry Niemela Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Ryan Properties Wendy Davis Bradley Nielsen Joseph Pazandak Petty Cash April Delta dental-group 538 Public works workshop Mileage/meeting expenses Financial books-Hurm Lottery bond Water hookup/meter refund Cellular phone air time Street light utilities Pop machine rental Telephone svcs/advertising Warming house rental Waste removal Liquor purchases Liquor, wine and misc purch Liquor and wine purchases April rent for store I Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases April rent for store II Sec 125 reimbursement Sec 125 reimbursement Sec 125 reimburse/mileage Petty cash reimbursement TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR ~OTAL CHECKS ISSUED -2- AMOUNT 224.00 70.00 26.27 20.50 100.00 4,125.00 25.89 1,770.05 10.00 188.86 125.00 339.00 2,136.12. 2,596.48 2,905.21 1,564.00 1,973.66 788.12 2,200.00 66.67 140.00 164.50 63.34 31,713.92 33,965.61. 65,679.53 CK NO CHECKS 8863 8864 8865 8866 8867 8868 8869 8870 8871 8872 8873 8874 8875 8876 8877 8878 .. 879 880 8881 8882 8883 8884 8885 8886 8887 8888 8889 8890 8891 8892 8893 8894 ..895 .896 8897 8898 8899 8900 8901 8902 8903 8904 8905 8906 8907 8908 8909 8910 CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Void Abdo, Abdo and Eick Airsignal, Inc Albinson American Linen Supply Anchor Paper Co. Earl F. Andersen/Assoc. Applied Graphics Assured Office Systems Baldwin Supply Co. Browning-Ferris Indust. Bryan Rock Products Business Records Corp. Chaska Parts Service Considated Typewriter Contact Mobile Commun. Crosstown OCS EOS Architecture City of Excelsior Feed-Rite Controls Debbie Grahek Henn cty Treasurer Jeff Jensen Jim Hatch Sales Kehoe Office Furnish. MacQueen EquipmentInc. Mann Made Products John Meldahl/Crad-Mel Metro Sales Inc. MAMA Midwest Business Prod. Midwest Mailing Systems Mn Suburban Publications Wm Mueller and Sons \' Navarre True Value North Star International Orr, Schelen, Mayeron and Associates Pitney Bowes precision Computer Southam Bus Communic. Tonka Auto/Body Supply Tonka Ford Total Tool Unitog Rental Svcs Van Doren, Hzd, Stlgs WW Grainger West Henn Hmn Svcs Widmer, Inc. PURPOSE Audit services Beeper services Map reductions Laundry services Office supplies Street signs Newsletter printing City hall janitorial svcs Lift station maint supplies Satellite rental pine Bend rock supplies Election supplies Vehicle maint supplies Typewriter main contract Installation of radio Coffee and paper towels Pub wks bldg services First 1/4 san swr chg Demurrage charge Council/pIng comm minutes Prisoner expense Lift station cover repair Shop supplies Conference board-admin off Maint supplies Welding services Vehicle repair Copier supplies Luncheon meeting-Hurm Office supplies Postage machine/scale maint. PUblishing Street supplies Maint supplies Truck 'painting Feb eng services .:general 3958.21 pw bldg 164.12 old mkt rd 1366.88 church rd 365.63 Postage machine rental Comp software updates Publishing Maint supplies Spray paint Pw shop supplies Laundry services Park planning services Lift station maint supplies 1992 contribution Dig up gate valve-Park st. , TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST -3- AMOUNT 2,400.00 9.58 32.00 263.58 388.55 30.29 890.00 295.00 29.95 43.39 492.66 71. 09 373.11 110.00 128.70 77.00 9,238.34 1,657.80 30.00 200.00 2,526.37 42.00 65.10 395.00 184.00 20.00 103.00 333.70 10.00 271. 61 205.00 186.93 723.69 31. 93 799.43 5,854.84 83.00 70.00 109.18 51. 62 17.64 143.79 312.34 234.84 20.60 1,302.00 494.00 31,352.65 97,032.18 CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT MARCH 24, 1992 PAYROLL 206035 Void 206036 (L) Scott Bartlett 27.5 reg hours 150.79 206037 (G) Charles Davis 80.0 reg hours 554.25 206038 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 543.33 206039 (L) Kevin Foss 11. 25 reg hours 59.22 206040 (L) Cory Frederick 33.75 reg hours 168.31 206041 (L) John Fruth 23.75 reg hours 118.80 206042 (L) Jeffrey Greenlee 8.0 reg hours 36.94 206043 (L) Jerry Harmsen 3.5 reg hours 17.46 206044 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 681. 78 206045 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,453.79 206046 (L) Brian Jakel 47.0 reg hours 227.49 206047 (G) Dennis Johnson 80.0 reg hours 735.24 206048 (L) Martin Jones 25.5 reg hours 127.16 . 206049 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 597.68 206050 (L) Mark Karsten 11. 75 reg hours 62.13 206051 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 793.34 206052 (L) Susan Latterner 37.0 reg hours 191.41 206053 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours-3 ot 758.90 206054 (L) Robert Lynch 7.0 reg hours 36.85 206055 (L) Russell Marron 30.5 reg hours 167.14 206.056 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours-3.75 ot 729.15 206057 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 654.72 206058 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 ' reg hours 937.92 206059 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 960.46 206060 (G) Daniel Randall 82.0 reg hours 762.87 206061 (L) Brian Roerick 10.75 . reg hours 55.91 206062 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 . reg hours 1,060.02 206063 (L) Brian Rosenberger 16.5 reg hours 76.86 206064 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours 385.04 206065 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours-3 ot 677.56. 206066 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 80.0 reg'hours-retro 591. 58 206067 (G) Ralph Wehle 80.0 reg hours 594.97 206068 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 588.59 206069 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1,153.43 TOTAL GENERAL 13,643.31 TOTAL LIQUOR 3;067.78 TOTAL PAYROLL 16.711.09 -4- CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS APRIL 1, 1992 PAYROLL 206070 Void 206071 (G) Barbara Brancel Mayor 206072 (G) Robert Daugherty Council 206073 (G) Robert Gagne Council 206074 (G) Daniel Lewis Council 206075 (G) Kristi Stover Council AMOUNT 187.10 140.32 142.50 140.32 142.50 TOTAL PAYROLL 752.74 . . " -5- CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 13, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT APRIL 7, 1992 PAYROLL 206076 Void 206077 (L) Scott Bartlett 4.0 reg hours 22.16 206078 (G) Charles Davis 80.0 reg hours 535.46 206079 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 543.32 206080 (L) Kevin Foss 15.5 reg hours 81. 59 206081 (L) Cory Frederick 25.0 reg hours 124.67 206082 (L) John Fruth 23.5 reg hours 117.74 206083 (L) Jeffrey Greenlee 24.5 reg hours 113.12 206084 (L) Jerry Harmsen 6.5 reg hours 32.41 206085 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 681.77 206086 (L) Rachel Hupp~rt 4.25 reg hours 21. 20 206087 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,493.60 206088 (L) Brian Jakel 51.5 reg hours 245.85 206089 (G) Dennis Johnson 80.0 reg hours 716.44 . 206090 (L) Martin Jones 21. 0 reg hours 104.73 206091 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 597.68 206092 (L) Mark Karsten 37.0 reg hours 186.69 206093 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 793.34 206094 (L) Susan Latterner 18.0 reg hours 95.16 206095 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours 701.20 206096 (L) Robert Lynch 7.0 reg hours 36.85 206097 (L) Russell Marron 35.0 reg hours 187.75 206098 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 668.91 206099 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 .reg hours-2 ot 680.56 206100 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 937.92 206101 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 960.46 206102 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours 726.78 206103 (L) Brian Roerick 3.0 reg hours 15.79 206104 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,060.02 206105 (L) Brian Rosenberger 24.0 reg hours 116.34 206106 (L) Chr istopher Schmid-. 80.0 reg hours 385.04 . 206107 (G) Howard Stark 82.0 reg" hours 637.15 206108 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 80.0 reg hours 533.63 206109 (G) Ralph Wehle 82.0 reg hours 593.45 206110 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 588.59 206111 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1,153.42 TOTAL GENERAL 13,417.43 TOTAL LIQUOR 3.073.36 TOTAL PAYROLL 16,490.79 -6- I' .' CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Wilson, Commissioners Lindstrom, Laberee, Dzurak, Mast and McCarty; Park Secretary Niccum; Council Liaison Lewis and Administrator Hurm Absent: Commissioner Andrus - out of town APPROVAL OF MINUTES - TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 Laberee moved, Lindstrom seconded, to Tuesday, February 11, 1991, as corrected. - 1 abstain (Mast) approve the minutes of Motion carried - 5 ayes REVIEW TRAIL PLAN IN PREPARATION FOR MARCH 24, 1992 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Park Planner Chamberlain said he has received the new City map, so the final plan is on the updated map. He said the Old Market Road on-street bike path and the on-street trail from the Shorewood/Chanhassen border up to Sweetwater Curve, and up Sweetwater Curve to Covington Road have been aqded to the plan. Also on page 11 - top - text- inclusion of maintenance costs. He said maintenance costs would be approximately 5% of the total cost. " Lewis asked what the total cost of completing trail plan projects would be. Chamberlain said $303,900 to $462,100, of which 5% would be $15,195 - $23,105. Dzurak mentioned Outlot B in Covington Vine Ridge, saying that the trail plan showed the trail running through Outlot B, and that the City does not have an easement across Outlot B, only Outlot A. Administrator Hurm said the trail plan should be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, and that the Park Commission should approach the Council directly for temporary approval. Dzurak also mentioned the Johnson property, saying that when it is developed, the City should ask for an easement from Vine Hill Road west to the Silverwood Park trail. Nielsen and Hurm said if"the ., ~. SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 - Page two Park Commission wants a trail there, it should be put on the map as a "proposed trail". Lewis asked if the proposed trail would have to go through the wetland area. Nielsen said it could go along the south side on dry land. Chamberlain said it would probably be a nature or woodchip trail and the cost would be a nominal amount. Lindstrom asked about the trail shown on the map that goes through the Boulder Bridge area. Chamberlain said it is a private trail. Nielsen said it is owned by the Association. He said the original intent was for use for horseback riding and walking. Hurm said he and Wilson had gone to the City of Chanhassen and met with staff there. He said there was no longer any possibility of the trail at the south end of Sweetwater Curve creating a merging of the ChanhassenjShorewood trail system. Chamberlain suggested removing the nature trail and bridge area and leaving the trail on- street on Sweetwater Curve. Nielsen said a lot relates to the MSA trails. The city is going to look hard at those and some may change due to funding. CONSIDERATION OF UPDATED SILVERWOOD PARK SITE PLAN Dzurak said the plan had been approved in July of 1990. He asked Nielsen what the effect of widening covington Road would have on the proposed tennis courts for Silverwood Park. He wanted to make sure that it would not affect the grading. that is proposed for this year. Nielsen said the Engineer is looking into it, also the wetland boundary, and how to fit the trail in. He said there is discussion regarding putting in sidewalks on Old Market Road and Covington Road. Dzurak asked if the discussion will be done by the time they are ready to begin'digging? Nielsen s~id he thought so, he said the wetland regulations will .constrict what can be done. Chamberlain said he has already been over the wetland with the Corps of Army Engine~rs and .:that there is enough room for adjustment of a few feet.- Chamberlain said the vehicle path from the parking lot to the warming house could be bituminous and wide enough to allow vehicles to reach the warming house, although they would have to go over part of the nature trail. aiip"l:6ve.....gcrin~r..'Bti€'.'.,.'.'f-o'r bids on April 13th, with the bid opening on May 1. Acceptance of the bid package would be contingent upon the approval of the Park Commission at their meeting the next day. REVIEW PARK AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City Planner Nielsen said the City is in the process of updating SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING -/ TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 - Page three the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. He went through the steps of the comprehensive planning process, 1 - 5. He said the Park Commission is actually in step 4, but now what they have to do is to go back and re-evaluate. Nielsen said there are several significant issues to consider, the first is money. In the neighborhood park category, is a park still needed on the west end? One was targeted in the 1980 comp plan, and there is still land open, most of it with a lot of wetland. He mentioned the former Adeline Johnson property, a 20 acre piece that has wetlands and access to Lake Minnetonka. What about mini- parks...on Galpin Lake? On the Islands? Nielsen pointed out that the park area in the middle of Shady Island is owned by the Association. He said the Commission has to consider what to do about park buildings. He said he is hoping to compile all issues for the joint meeting with the Council, Planning Commission, and Park Commission on March 23. He said as we go along additional issues will come up. Wilson asked how long the planning period is? 5 years? Nielsen said 5 years is good, 10 years is pretty long. Nielsen said funding is really limited, no more LAWCON, no outside sources. He said the only things left are a bond referendum or the general fund. Nielsen asked the Commission to get to him in the next couple of weeks if they have any information to offer on any other aspects on the comp plan. He asked the Commission if they should reconsider buying land? Hurm said the Park Capital Improvement Plan and ~he Comprehensive Plan must be consistant. Mast said it is nice to have a'''wish list", that the Commission shouldn't just close the -door, .:for instance.. .what if a donation came along? McCarty said she would think about lake access, not pecessarily for boats, more along the line of a beach. CONSIDERATION OF A MODEL NEIGHBORHOOD.PARK SHELTER BUILDING DESIGN Hurm said he and Planner Nielsen had met and discussed design. He asked where the estimated figure of $40,000 came from. He said he thought a very basic building could be built for under $25,000. Nielsen discussed the original plan of a 24'by 24' enclosed area with a 24' x 24' pavilion. He said the Commission had previously SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING " TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 - Page four stipulated that they wanted the building to be constructed of wood. Staff is asking the Commission to reconsider this stipulation 0 Staff feels a masonry building is more feasible, it would be more vandal-proof. Nielsen said it might prevent the need to run footings under the entire structure if the warming house and the pavilion were separated. He also said after doing more research he was discovering that indoor bathrooms need constant supervision. The Commission discussed indoor bathrooms vs. satellites. Dzurak asked if handicapped satellites exist. They do. They also debated whether the satellites should be incorporated into the building plan, or placed in a separate screened area. Nielsen said our current zoning ordinance says sewer should go to the building, but this can be changed. Lindstrom said the building existing in the Excelsior Commons is a good example. Laberee said Silverwood, Manor and Cathcart may never need inside plumbing. DISCUSSION OF PARK PLAN C OPTIONS - CATHCART PARK Chairman Jim Wilson and Administrator James 'C. Hurm met with Don Ashworth, City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, and Todd Hoffman, Chanhassen Park and Rec Department. The.Chanhassen staff is going to discuss Cathcart Park with their Park Commission. Hurm will meet with neighbors to inform them of the options the City is considering, and to receive input. '. .. FINAL PARK TELEPHONE SURVEY REPORT The.Commission was pleaped with ~he survey, they felt it was a well done report and very helpful. PARK REFERENDUM ACTION PLAN CONSIDERATIONS commissioner Dzurak presented an updated calendar plan. He said if you need volunteers, it takes a long time. He said the plan can be revised as experience is gained. McCarty questioned whether or not the plan allowed for too much lead time. Dzurak said maybe so, but time is needed to acquaint the City Council with the plan, and to convince them of its potentiality. Hurm said the Mayor has names of several people who might be interested. Dzurak said former Commissioners Vogel and Christensen were also interested. ( # SHOREWOOD PARR COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 - Page five Lewis said the Council would like to see the Park Commission implement a plan to ensure success. Laberee questioned whether a change in Council would affect the referendum. He said he thinks someone with referendum experience should be involved. Lewis reminded the Commission that a consultant will not implement the plan for them. Lindstrom said he felt Koegler was valuable to the City, he has attended the neighbor meetings and worked with referendums before. Laberee thought we should ask Koegler how he could help us. Lindstrom said he would like to meet with the Council and get their opinion. ADJOURNMENT Laberee lO:lOPM. moved, Lindstrom seconded, to Motion carried unanimously. adjourn the meeting at RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Susan Niccum Park Secretary I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I g VanDoren Hazard Stallings, Inc. Ar.chitects . Engineers. Planners March 25, 1992 Mr. James Hurm, City Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: City-Wide Trail Plan Shorewood, Minnesota VHS Proj. #90-327 Dear Mr. Hurm and Park Commission: Enclosed please find the final version of the Shorewood Trail Plan. The plan includes introductory text describing the parameters and focus of the plan, a description of trail types, a description of the proposed system, implementation/capital costs and in the appendix, two different financing scenarios are outlined. We will be happy to discuss and present this plan at any upcoming public forums. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely, VAN DOREN-HAZARD-ST ALLINGS, INC. 6/1ad ~. ~ Bruce L. Chamberlain Project Planner BLC:wms Enc. TRAILPLN .L52 3030 Harbor Lane North, Bldg. II, Suite 104, Minneapolis Minnesota 55447-2175 (612) 553-1950 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Introduction The 1980 Shorewood Parks & Open Space Plan recognized a comprehensive trail system as an important element in Shorewood's future park development. The plan identified priorities toward the development of a trail system. 1) Develop the Chicago-Northwestern Railroad corridor as a regional trail. 2) Develop trail corridors which link parks/open space with residential neighborhoods. 3) Develop recreational trail "loops" within large parks/nature areas and around lakes and wetlands. To date, some progress has been made toward realizing the priorities outlined above. 1) The Shorewood portion of the Chicago-Northwestern Railroad corridor has been developed as part of a regional trail. 2) A recreational loop trail has been established at Freeman Park. As the demand for all types of recreational facilities increases, trail development has become a high priority for many suburban communities. The City of Shorewood displayed its commitment to a comprehensive trail system by issuing a Park Commission directive in the fall of 1990 authorizing the completion of this trail plan. The residents of Shorewood expressed their interest in developing a trail system during a series of Spring 1991 neighborhood meetings concerning park improvements. Residents were asked what types of future park improvements they would like to see in Shorewood. A frequently mentioned response was the development of a trail system. Shorewood Trail Plan · 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Planning Considerations To insure the successful coexistence of Shorewood's trail system with other community developments and activities, local influences have been considered. Local influences include: * Landscape features: Topography, vegetation, soils and natural features such as wetlands and wooded areas have been considered in the planning of the Shorewood trail system. * Existing development patterns: There are numerous individual considerations that need to be made to accommodate a trail corridor through currently developed areas. Because a trail system was not envisioned at the time of most development, there are many developed areas where compromise of the ideal trail corridor is required. * Development trends: New development and redevelopment can impact the alignment of a trail corridor as well as the type of use it receives. To mitigate problems and identify opportunities for a trail system, the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan has been used as a guide to existing and proposed land uses. The trail system takes advantage of existing corridors through developed areas. * Existing and proposed recreation areas: As identified in the introduction, using trails to link residential neighborhoods with recreation areas is a priority. All Shorewood park locations have been identified and trail access to and from them has been considered. * Linkage with adjacent community and regional trails: Nearly all adjacent communities are currently developing or planning trail systems. The Shorewood trail system should attempt to become part of a larger regional network of trails that encompasses the Southern Lake Minnetonka region and more. To ensure that Shorewood is well connected to the larger regional network, the Chicago-Northwestern Regional Trail will become the primary trail artery in Shorewood. All other trail loops and spurs within Shorewood should connect and reconnect with the regional trail. * Roadway improvements: The alterations of T.H. 7 and Vine Hill Road will impact positioning of trail crossings and as a result affect trail alignment in some areas. To identify road improvements, and plan the Shorewood trail system accordingly the T.H. 7 Corridor Study, BRW, 1986; has been used as a guide. Shorewood Trail Plan · 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Trail Types Trails can accommodate various types of use. Walking, jogging, roller skating, bicycling, cross-country skiing, snowmobiling and horseback riding are all potential uses of trails. For purposes of trail planning and implementation, trails have been categorized into five classifications: Sidewalks, Walkways/ Bikeways, Nature Trails, Multiple Use Trails and Private Trails. * Sidewalks: Sidewalks are 4 - 6 foot wide concrete trails adjacent to public streets. They are intended to accommodate recreational and functional pedestrian use as well as light bicycle traffic. They will service pedestrians within residential neighborhoods, between adjacent residential neighborhoods and between residential neighborhoods and commercial centers. They will link with walkways/bikeways and nature trails at designated embarkation points. Sidewalks are not shown on the trail plan because their construction requires detailed and site specific consideration, more detail than is feasible at this point in the process. Sidewalks should be planned and developed along with roadway construction and reconstruction. * WalkwayslBikeways: Walkways/bikeways are trail facilities designed to accommodate both pedestrian and bicycle usage. Such trails will be bituminous surfacing and 6 feet wide in order to minimize impact on residential properties. In areas of heavy activity, separate trails for pedestrian and bicycle usage may be desired. Walkways/bikeways can also accommodate activities such as roller skating, blading and cross-country skiing. * Nature Trails: Nature trails are designed solely for pedestrian use. They are usually constructed of wood chips, compacted crushed-rock or bituminous. They can be used for functional purposes such as trips to school or the convenience store but in all cases pure recreation will be their main focus. * Multiple Use Trails: Multiple use trails are well suited to a number of uses ranging from walking to snowmobiling. The Chicago-Northwestern Regional Trail is included in this category. It should be noted that snowmobiles and horses will be allowed to use the Chicago-Northwestern regional trail. * Private Trails: Private trails are easements acquired by special use groups for activities such as horseback riding or snowmobiling. The acquisition, maintenance and liability of these trails are the responsibility of those who develop them. Shorewood Trail Plan · 3 PI .1 I I II I Ii! I 'I! ~ ~ i ~ ! ~ - ~ [ ;:;.!! ~ ~ i fj ~ ~ E I ; II Ii: lr/ ~ . . c: CIS is: - 'ft; ~ 1 ... o .c CI) ~ ~ t o o 8 ! o~ i~ iB i~ J ~ ~ ... ~ c u; = :3 .: eu 'j! 2- - !o- "j! "j! =- t;- "" !o- !o- - " ~ ;0, ;0, .- E E E eu E /ji ... .. .. c "i! "i! E. j .. (,J ;;I ~ -l.'! t ;; !o- .. !0- f ... l. -< t t: ]- ~ "0 .. .. " .. t;- ... . :; ;> ~ ;; .3 :;' "I: 0 0 -< ;z: :E ~ ~ t- o Z ~ u.J U '" .. ..l!l u.J 0 'f 0;: -= u CI.) ... ~ c.... .5 or;; }ft~ . ~~ . 0 . 'C ~ . 0 . . ~... :t; . . =~ c . 0 . .. ~!t . . ~ U~ . 0 . . ~-~ . 0 . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ rn~ I..~ ~ . I l : ~~ f: ~ I i ---- ---------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Proposed System The Shorewood trail system provides trail connections between major parks, neighborhoods, commercial centers and adjacent communities. It allows Shorewood residents to enjoy the natural environment by providing loop trails around natural features such as wetlands and wildlife areas. It also promotes community cohesiveness by providing links and gathering places within and between neighborhoods. Because of physical constraints, development patterns and projected use, a variety of trail location types have been used. Advantages and disadvantages of each of the types are listed below. Trail location Disadvantages Advantages Along Streets *Motor vehicle conflicts *Maintenance may require specialized equipment * Abutting property conflicts *Easy Monitoring *Identifiable routes *Easier to finance - construction can be combined with street improvements Within Parks *Few vehicle conflicts *Trails can follow natural features such as drainageways *Development cost may be grant eligible *Very difficult to monitor *Public familiarity requires promotional efforts Between Lot Lines *Few vehicle conflicts *Trails can follow natural features such as drainageways * Abutting property conflicts *Perceived security problems * Additional sidewalk system may be needed *Higher level of maintenance required The majority of the Shorewood Trail System will be walkway/bikeway trails along streets, either off-street, on a separate trail path or on-street, directly on designated and signed streets. As indicated on the Proposed Trail System map, the majority of walkway/bikeway trails are on-street designated trails. The following list indicates the off- street walkway/bikeway trail segments. * Along Smithtown Road and County Rd. 19 from the Victoria city limits near Smithtown Bay to Galpin Lake Rd. at Galpin Lake and T.H. 7. Shorewood Trail Plan · 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * Along T.H. 7 from Church Rd. (access to Cathcart Park) in Chanhassen to Yellowstone Trail; proceeding along Yellowstone Trail into Excelsior along Academy Ave. to Water St. and North on Water St. to Co. Rd. 19. * Along Country Club Rd. and Co. Rd. 19 from Yellowstone Tr. to the Chicago- Northwestern Regional Trail. * Along St. Albans Bay Rd. and Covington Rd. from Minnetonka Blvd. in the North to Vine Hill Rd. in the South. * Along the service road south ofT.H. 7 from Covington Rd. to Old Market Rd. It should be noted that the trails discussed above have segments in Chanhassen and Excelsior. Obviously, construction of these segments would be the decision of each munic'pality. To ensure everyone is working together, adjacent communities should be kept well a reast of Shorewood's trail planning and construction efforts. As discussed earlier, the alterations of T.H. 7 will impact the positioning of the trail syste . There are three locations along T.H. 7 where construction will impact trail crossings. The fi st is the new signalized intersection at Old Market Road. To provide safe crossing, a sign lized crosswalk should be included. The second location is a bridge crossing at Mill Street which is actually in Excelsior but has a direct bearing on the Shorewood trail system. To ta e advantage of the bridge as a trail link, a separate trail lane should be incorporated into t e bridge design. The third location is the Co. Rd. 19/Galpin Lake Rd. area. In this area signalized, at-grade intersection is proposed at the existing Co. Rd. 19/f.H. 7 inters ction. There is a long-term possibility (depending of traffic volume) of a signalized inters ction at Galpin Lake Rd. also. To accommodate safe trail crossing from Galpin Lake Rd. t Co. Rd. 19, a trail easement paralleling T.H. 7 should be included North of Galpin Lake om Galpin Lake Rd. to the Co. Rd. 19rr.H. 7 intersection. There, a signalized alk should be installed for the safe crossing of T.H. 7. In these cases it will be crucial for the City of Shorewood to work closely with the Minn sota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) to ensure measures can be taken to acco modate safe trail crossings. To ensure uniformity and safety, the Shorewood trail system will be developed under a uni~ rm set of standards. Although the standards may be impractical in some cases, every effort will be made to construct new trails in accordance with the following specifications: 1) Walkway/bikeway trails will be 6 feet wide to accommodate two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic. In areas of heavy volume, where space allows, pedestrian and bicycle traffic will be separated. Shorewood Trail Plan · 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2) Walkway/bikeway trails will be separated from motor vehicle traffic to reduce conflicts and safety hazards. 3) Avoid long, steep grades; 6% maximum slope is preferred, 8% maximum where unavoidable due to existing terrain. 4) Use less steep grades at intersections with streets or other trailways; 2% maximum to allow adequate ability to stop. 5) For drainage purposes, 1% minimum slope is preferred; not less than 0.5% to be used. 6) Use 0.02'/foot minimum and 0.04'/foot maximum cross-slope or crown. 7) Provide adequate clearance for vertical obstructions (trees, power poles, signs, etc.). 4 foot preferred minimum distance from the edge of path, 2 foot absolute minimum for bicycle trails. 8) Shape and compact subgrade to 100% standard density. Excavate and remove all topsoil, black dirt, peat, muck or silt soils from beneath pathway. Backfill with select grading material. 9) Provide positive surface water drainage away from trailways with shallow drainage swales or ditches, culverts and/or storm sewer as required. Subgrade of trailway to be minimum of two feet above water table. 10) Avoid sharp or sudden changes in horizontal and vertical trail alignment. Provide adequate site distance for bicycles at intersections and on vertical changes in alignment. Extra width and/or flat curves required on long downhill slopes for additional reaction space. 11) Bicycle trails to be marked and signed in accordance with the latest edition of the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 12) Minimum standards shall be increased as necessary where required by poor subgrade soil, traffic volumes, hazardous conditions, or other special circumstances. Shorewood Trail Plan · 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Bicycle Width : yManeuvering Area : V=Minimum Paved Surface : J ,-Clearance 3'-6- REQUIRED CLEARANCES No Scale A.O.W. Varies Varies 6' -i)- 3- Bitumnous Compacted Class 6 8' -i)- Note Trans In developed areas may be constructed of concrete and may have widths that are less than .hown above. WALKWAY/BIKEWAY TYPICAL RURAL AREA SECTION No Scale Wal aylBikeway Trails Shorewood Trail Plan · 8 I I ~.~ ' 'U~,.6 , ~I !! L..! ~ I . 'r ."~ 1 bo.o L./~\J,(r:=:ii'~' . L_">Nln""~ ~ , i.".... _!... . .. . . .. ~m H. d rr~O:----= l ~\~ :1-1'i \~'Il i~:?t ~~~.:~~~:J1'1'1~~~'(~~~i~~):tR '1 '~II .. '\ I F":~ : t f & i ~ ' '- I' ~.~:)r:r0J.: ,~ \~ I 5: J! ..../11/ ~ ,,_\Y-, ""J\ ~ f?-J \. ~f E.' .'~ __ ',~ ~I ~:':' y' /'. J u ,\n 0'~ ~~~Hs:.,~;rl ~O:~~~f (', ..' -I -,\~ iD' ~ \'~ :~~'~lt~ I.~~<'- \ . ~ l:j ~ \~! ~' ~ ~ t (l I , ~ I - '-.- ---. co:. '\ 'UT 'I . ,1 t<" I ): ~ "'( , , I I J) ~ " ~.- 0, . \, "' \ ~.....~~ ',~~,",' I l, ~.... . ~ Z "' \ '~~. , ' , 01 ~ I "'..'1 ,~ .' \. ~oo 0 "'\~ \ . I ~.. ..c.j I ~".. 0 I........ 'I - " . .~ · ~" l~ U~\ \\ - ':i 1~1 1/ ':" ."t~10- ~~". U' \ ~ ~I ! , fl, I ~~~'2~ " ~ ...J "" ' ~ j ~ , <? ~~' ~ @ '\" ' ~ " l / . Ik. .-\'0 ~ , ""J J.... ~~;..~~:'~ I ! I: "\~ S'(C / jl 08 ~(~~~t~!!..:~~:'p ~.~I. I . "'1~' I "". z I . "." I' ~ . I" " ! ", '..' I~~ ~ ~\ J:;-1\, '. ~ ,; .J I ,I = ~ t ~~ ~'j'''H~ ~ f1ij H - .ltX~ ]~"J 1111 I8 ~.~.!!~ . !--i ~ ,A~t\~ iJlr I A IU~~"~'~[ nB ~i .tv! ~&:~~,." <~ ~ ~ : Ie lE ;r vl(~ . {i ;~'li""" ;:=.... ~ it\ k/J .,.,., 1 " I~' \~ I.\~, .~i- !lllll\~ \1[. ,,'-;:\. i" .~ ;>:'-'4 -~-...J' [. , ~,tf ''Ii or ~ : \ I . 'II 11M ("~ ~ ~,I '- i' - 'r A I \: t ~ _0- :J~Fl'~ .~~:>..,v In~i I i L ", a ~r1;ffi roo ;~lt~~'~ ~ : r~il;~'< I ~l~ l!~; z~~\~!~~Ji<,1=\1;,1 ~ ~.! :1 ~,.~~Ij ~ ~ i Hir) O 0 11, 0 co: co: , III I -:..i-: . lit ~ po a II J.. 'JiI?'!~, U ~ r \~r- f. ~ ~~ U II't. a: I: '.' I: 1,1 ~. ~ Ilr-,'.,"',':"";',~, ! 1..- ~ > iQ~ lln-if I \00 I -t 1 I i~.. .._..~...:~~;....~~.t ;, ~i}:i L 'H r ~,~~.: i '<ll~ ',"~ I 'T';' !" ': ~\ " ... J: i1 ' IIi ~, ) I' I . - , ~ ~ U! I:"~ I . III ,. ~ ,~ l! <: "I, t I ,g w "~\'kl.: ,I ~ ~ ~ .~'-;\~-l\~~ "ii ~ ~. ~. - - ~'~-ffi' ~ ~ U ~\ j I" ---I ,j.-k. '- rn" I~t:; Q. V'l ,,~~ 'J 0 .~~ ~ ~" \. ,d., i'~.... S \ ',<frIIL'~)'"/ 'li I,' '1. "I '. ~~, ;,' 1:J 5 I,I~~ . ui i -i I i 1 ~~.. .~,m>i i ~ ""-" [" ' I [r- .- ~~. -,-l J) ..... ~l ',', - Ii U (if[L il~ ',Ju;J;i ,.~.~ ~ y,- _u_1 ~\ I -o-r V'l '<;"~1' ' . ~n \" : -~ Ii' "\. ,) iT I' :. '," ~..- {.n,,:., ,\..., ,~:". 'oM I . V' - " ~ ~. ,.,'~ L ! '--21 i li ~ 1 "\\\.)';\1'~, ~r, 2-" 'A /( =1~ III ~.~ ,/~/ I~,'~, I' I~ ;~ I '/(;;It: ~ T i I - ~ : )"l/k'tf \ ~ \' 1'<::5?> ,k' -' ;'~ , I 1- me- ,_r t ~f'- ~CEJi: 'J~\r ' · ~'GBrn~ Wr 'I! I '! ~ J :----( I P j I ~ ~ ~. = ~ - ~ ... ~ c:: ~ ;:j c .~ ~ ... '~ e- 'S ... ,. .~ I E ... .. E t: 0 '~ f I .. v ;;, t lJ ;; ... .. ... .. .:( f ]- :l c. lJ lil .. ,. .. e- 1ii :; .. "iii ~ '6' 'C U -0: :z ::0 c. ~ - .- ~ a. E-c "0 o o ~ e a.:l 011> -=~ 00:; c..~ 0." .. ~II> 'to .... &. c .- e ~ Ul':l. ~ :iKf: . 0 . . I <.t;f . 0 . . . . x\< . 0 . ~~ . . . 0 . . ;:;-~{ . 0 . . . . f! 1 I ~ CJf r ,,' ,... III '" ~!ii ~ ,~.\ 'k.. ) I I , ill . ~ <;l ~ ~ ~ Ii I' i: ,\ ~ i ! ~; I : ! ~ > ! j ;" I I: : III ~ I 1&' 0\ . = cu s:: - 'C; ~ 8 ~ ... o .c:: en ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! l #,-'../~ I "'.~. \~ ~. '''~'' 'Q'lS1~l3NNIVol ,--\ --~---------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Implementation/Capital Costs The proposed Shorewood trail system is extensive. Therefore, implementation is dependent upon priorities and funding levels. In order to prioritize trail segments, the following factors need to be considered. * Safety * Property Owner Acceptance * Capital Cost * Maintenance Cost * Continuity with Existing Shorewood Trails * Number of Users Served * Range of Trail Use Opportunities * Linkage with Regional or Other Municipal Trails * Accommodation of School Pedestrian Traffic Further recommendations to help prioritize trail segments. * Take advantage of the Chicago-Northwestern Regional Trail Corridor as a central spine, a starting and ending point for subsequent trails. * Utilize trail easements within developments to connect with broader reaching tFail segments. * Take advantage of street improvement projects to build trails. * Give high-use trails top priority. * Be cognizant of potential trail easements when new developments are proposed. * Link trails with community gathering points. Capital Costs The cost of constructing trail segments varies significantly due to land availability, terrain, vegetation and street crossings. For the purposes of this report, the cost of a 6 foot wide bituminous trail varies from $6.00 per lineal foot to $9.00 per lineal foot, depending on existing conditions. This equates to a total walkway/bikeway trail construction cost of $31,680 to $47,520 per mile. The cost of nature trails is approximately $3.00 per square yard or approximately $7,000 per mile. It is important to note that if Municipal State Aid (MSA) is used to fund trail construction, the trails must be constructed using concrete which raises trail costs to approximately $15.60 per lineal foot or $82,368 per mile. These costs include not only actual construction costs but also a portion for legal, administrative, design and inspection fees and also a portion for additional contingencies that are unforeseeable until a project is undertaken. Signs will be an important element of trails. Average sign costs range between $150 and $200. Cost projections for the Shorewood trail segments outlined below include trail construction and related costs as well as estimated sign costs based on the number of intersections. Walkway/bikeway costs reflect bituminous construction, not concrete. (See appendix for MSA cost breakdowns using concrete walkway/bikeways.) SborewoodTrailPlan -10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Maintenance costs are an important consideration when constructing trails. For budgeting purposes the City of Shorewood should annually dedicate 3-5% of all previous trail construction costs for maintenance. For instance, if $100,000 worth of trails have been constructed, $3,000-5,000 should be programmed annually for maintenance. Some of the money will be spent every year for items such as plowing but a majority of the money will be saved for major maintenance every 7-10 years. Priority of Trail Segments: * First Priority: (1) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Smithtown Rd. from the Victoria city limits to Co. Rd. 19. Cost: $87,600 - $130,700. (MSA designated street) (2) Designate and sign Co. Rd. 19 as an on-street walkway/bikeway from Smith town Rd. to the Excelsior city limits. Cost: $600 - $800 (3) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Co. Rd. 19 from the Chicago-Northwestern Regional Trail to Country Club Road. Cost: $12,000 - $17,900 (4) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Country Club Rd. from County Rd. 19 to Yellowstone Trail. Cost: $14,700 - $22,000. (MSA designated street) (5) Designate and sign Yellowstone Tr. and Academy Ave. as an on-street walkway/bikeway from T.H. 7 to the Excelsior city limits. Cost: $900 - $1,200. (MSA designated street) (6) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along T.H. 7 from the entry to Freeman Park to Yellowstone Trail. This segment must be in accordance with Mn/DOT T.H. 7 improvement plans. Cost: $15,900 - $23,700 (7) Construct nature trails in the vicinity of Silverwood park. Cost: $9,000 (8) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Covington Rd. from T.H. 7 to Vine Hill Road. Cost: $33,900 - $50,500. (MSA designated street from Old Market Rd. to Vine Hill Rd.) (9) Designate Old Market Road as an on-street walkway/bikeway trail from T.H. 7 to Covington Road. Cost: $300 - $400. (MSA designated street.) (10) Enter into discussions with Mn/DOT concerning trail crossings of T.H. 7 I ShorewoodTrailPlan -11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * Second Priority: (1) Construct appropriate trail crossings of T.H. 7 at designated locations. Cost: $6,000 -$12,000 (2) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along T.H. 7, north of Galpin Lake from the T.H. 7/Co. Rd. 19 intersection to Galpin Lake Road. Cost: $3,600 - $5,400 (3) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway along the south side of T.H. 7 from Covington Rd. to Old Market Road. Cost: $6,600 - $9,900 (4) Designate and sign as an on-street walkway/bikeway, the service road north of T.H. 7 from Old Market Rd. to St. Atbans Bay Road. Cost: $600 - $800 (5) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along St. Atbans Bay Rd. from Minnetonka Blvd. to T.H. 7. Cost: $29,700 - $44,400 (6) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Co. Rd. 19 from Smithtown Rd. to the Excelsior city limits and work with the City of Excelsior to continue that trail within Excelsior to the T.H. 7 intersection. Cost: $21,600 - $32,300 (7) Construct off-street walkway/bikeway trail along Yellowstone Tr. and Academy Ave. from T.H. 7 to the Excelsior city limits and work with the City of Excelsior to continue that trail along Water St. to Co. Rd. 19 within Excelsior. Cost: $41,400 - $62,100. (MSA designated street) (8) Designate and sign all remaining on-street walkway/bikeway trails. Cost: $11,100 - $14,800 * On-Going Functions: (1) Designate and construct nature trails within parks and open areas. Cost: $6,000 - $11,000 (2) Identify and secure trail easements where they are necessary for future trail development. (3) Periodically evaluate trail needs and plan accordingly. Shorewood Trail Plan -12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The total cost of the Shorewood Trail System, in 1991 dollars, ranges from $301,500 to $448,900. These numbers represent a reasonable range of construction and related costs but do not include such costs as land acquisition and maintenance. Funding Sources The City of Shorewood has several financial tools available to fund the construction of a trail system. A description of each follows. Park Improvement Bonds - Municipalities commonly utilize Park Improvement Bonds for construction of major facilities. The authority to sell such bonds requires voter approval. General Fund Money - If trails were determined to be a community priority, the City Council could allocate an amount of money from the General Fund for construction purposes. LA WCON/LCMR Grants - Trails are still grant-eligible items under the LA WCON/LCMR Grant program. In order to enhance the probability of trails being funded, most communities combine them with other improvements. Park Dedication Fees - Park dedication fees collected from residential, commercial and industrial development can be applied to the construction of trail systems. In lieu of a cash contribution, a municipality can negotiate to have the developer provide the land and install trails as a part of the overall park credits. Trail Dedication Fees - In addition to park dedication fees, many communities collect separate trail dedication fees. This fund would be collected along with park dedication fees and would be devoted specifically to trail development. Street Improvements - In many communities street improvement projects have been responsible for a majority of the community's trail system. Trail development conducted simultaneously with street improvements is the most economical method of constructing trails since trail construction can be funded within the total cost of the street improvement project. Intergovernmental Coordination - Coordination and cooperation between various governmental entities can be an effective method of constructing trails. It is fairly common for cities and school districts to jointly fund trail systems which benefit both parties. ShorewoodTrailPlan -13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The City of Shorewood should take full advantage of the trail funding sources outlined above. In Shorewood's case the most cost effective method of funding the majority of trails is through street improvement projects. If streets are Municipal State Aid (MSA) designated, trail construction becomes even more economical since MSA will pay 5/6 of the trail costs, leaving only 1/6 for the city to cover. (See appendix for map of MSA designated streets.) As mentioned earlier, constructing trails in conjunction with streets means that trails will be implemented over a relatively long period of time. Shorewood can elect to use the most suitable funding source available for the various trail segments depending on timing, priority and cost. The appendix of this document outlines two funding alternatives and cost breakdowns. The first (pp. A-2,3) uses the trail segment priorities as listed above but incorporates MSA funding wherever possible. Remember that MSA funded trails require construction using concrete. The associated map (p. A-4) illustrates trail segment priorities. The second scenario (pp. A-5,6) looks at the possibility of a successful trail referendum. This scenario explores a new priority system to accommodate changes in funding mechanisms. The associated map (p. A-7) illustrates the changed trail segment priorities. The two scenarios represent extreme cases. Shorewood will likely use variations of both scenarios to fund its trail system. SRORBTRL.'J'52 Shorewood Trail Plan · 14 ~ . ~. o 8 ~~ ~ i - ~ C bIl ~ ~ .., 0 ~'O ~ '0:: ... ... _ 0 VJU <::: VJ ~ r .J~ I~ c: f ~ c: . > i ! I I ;1 I Iii ~ ~ - < . c ~ Q:; - ~ '8 ~ ... o .c VJ ---------------~--- I z 0 I B ;:l =' E-< l'I.l I z 0 u I ~ 0 u I ~ < l'I.l I :a ~ I Q ~ fi ~ I ~ I ~ . I I I Z 0 I ~~ I ~~ ::gO I ~~ 0000 ~i I ~c 0 I ~~ 0< 000 I ~~ OZ =~ oo~ I [ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ./ ~ t-- t-- r:f r-: r-: ..... ~ 0\ ..... ~ N vi' ~ - ('f'l N - N ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., (,lit ..., ..., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ t-- ..... r-: \0 ..... 0\ 0\ - 0\ ~ vi' ......~ C '<t - N If) UU~ - ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., ..., (,lit (,lit t:l ~ e Q .... ~ -g 8 If) If} < ..... 0 ~ U~_ .... If} 0 U E-< o~ ~ ~ N ~~ ~ r-: - (,lit (,lit <~ ~ ~ ~ (/)c: g ..... ~ ~~ - ('f'l (,lit (,lit ..., ... ~ ~ t:l .. .... ~ If) o:s .t:l ~ ... ~ '" ~ ~ ~ = 0.. Q)'" ... 0'" Q)'" ... 0'" :e 0'" Q)'" ... 0'" ~ ... 8 ~ .5 ~ ... 8 ~ .5 ~ .5 8 ... 8 ~ .5 ~ ~;; ... e... ~;; ... e... '1:1 et: ~;; e... Q'{1 .E~ Q'{1 =~ i '" Q'{1 =~ C:l6 C:l6 =l6 C:l6 8 0 ';;; 6 8 0 ';;; 6 .- :So 8 0 ';;; 6 ..... ,&)0 ,&)0 ,&)0 ~ .=! .=! .=! .=~ .= .= '" .='" .c:~ ~ '" ! .= ~.;;; Q 8 c: 8.~ 'bo'" tlll ~,;;; ~.;;; 8,!:p 8.~ c: c: .- .- ..... ~ ti~ '" '" V)'" V) N'" - '" '" t:l ~~ '<t - '<t NN \0 N\O \IS Nt-- ~t-- N 0 .... - 0 g. e- c: 'C ... ... J!l ... Q) ! ~ 0 u c: ~ c: .~ If} ..... = ... 0 e 0 '" ~ 8 0 .(( ... ~ ... ~ :i ... e-'~ ~ .llll '1:1 ~ tx: Q) - ~ 0 0 0\ .. '1:1 ... ... - '" - c: .... ... - ~ 0 ... ~ U -d - -d Q) .- ~ II) - ~ 'I:I...J I .llll 0\ '" tx: tx: ~.~ 0 ~ t-- - .;::: 9 ... 0 ~ .~ 8 t-- ~ :i -d t) (; ~u .!ll! ::e '1:1 ~ ~. c: Q) .'1:1 ;> .=e ... ~ .2; <5 0 .- =.g ~ ..... 8~ '1:1 ..... 0 .~ :i 'EO tx:~ ~.!!3 c: fi) -d ~ ~~ Q) E-<8 '" -d -d. ~ ~~ tx: ,&) e l!i tx: tx:~ tx: c: ::ej ... = Q) ~&1 ~ c: 6\U 6\ ~ ... ~ Q) ~~ 06 c: c:_ ~ =~ -.. - 9 0 ~c: .-d e-'" 0 0- .. .- .0 ~;: 'bo 'bo- '" .. 0.. ~~ ...'1:1 '1:1'- ~~ = ~ r.:. e c:::r.:: ~ t-- - -s~ ~.!!3 c: '" - = ~~ ~~ - ::cO 8~ ,&) == =::e ::e'; ..... ..... . = ... '1:1 ~ e . 80 8~ ~~ '" <5 (/)8 ~~ z ~g A-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I' I z o I h I ~~ QE-< ~o ~~ I ~~ , ~~ I QS 0< Or/} I ~~ =r/} r/}~ I N ~ OIl CIS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0\ 1 N r-: -.E - N ~ f"\ 0 - - N ~ ~ - 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - e-j:l.., = 0\ 1 N r-: -.E .... 0\ fIJ ........... = f"\ - - - ~ ... uu~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ~ c::l ~ ~ e ~ ... e-'gg fIJ fIJ < ._ 0 <I) ... U~~ fIJ 0 U E-< 0 o~ N ~ ~5 .... N ::8~ "" ;;;~ 8 ~ r-- ::8= ~ .... ~ ~ ~ f"\ ~ ... ~ ~ c::l ... ... fIJ ~ CIll .Cl ~ ... ~ <I) ~ <I) ::l ::l 0- - 0- 0- CI)- - ~ .5 e e .5 e .5 e - ~ e e- - e- e- ~~ - E~ = <I) <I) <I) Q'{l .~ C: .E~ E~ =~ .- :So 8 0 'en S ,Qo <I) 0 ,Qo ~ .t .t! .t! .t <I) ~?10 <I) .~ c::l 8 = ~ Q.. 0 bo~ ~ ~'en 8._ <I) e e ... =Q - <I) V') <I) ~ 3~ a ~Ci3 .... ~ -.EIO l"'i~ \is r-- .e u fIJ ~ - ~ 1 Q ~ ~ - ... ,Q ~ ... ~ ;;: ~ ~ ::8 la ~:J :s:! ..: = 0 ;>.'- .!!l tI.l 0 - e .5 0 0 - -d 'e CI) .g..J 0 - = P:: - .!!l - -d = ~8 - .- -d .- ~ <I) e ~ P:: ::8 P:: - 0.:: ~C) - = CI) -d .=e <I) e .:0= I ~ ... P:: - .- :-':;; = ::l .- ..J 0 ~ ~e- ...- - ::8 ~ E-<8 OIl ~ = z - '> g~ = = '0 ~ cd:> 'S OIl ~ 8 0 =~ ~r-- -... sa 0 .- = ~ ~ 'S ..-d .0 ~;: e ~~ t=-= !::e '0 .- .- r--p:: p::.!!l e ~ ::e. ::e~ ;;:~ 8~ =::e ~ S .'0 ..: 0 ~~ ~ E-<P:: ~~ tI.l_ P:: A-3 I I I I I I; r- CD E CD ::I Q. " ." m " m 0 c " " " .. c ~ "0 ! .. CD 0 !r 6' 3' .. iD '" co '" .... 0. ." ." ~ :;' ." D> C ~ D> ~ C ~ CD 1jj' 1jj' .. .... .. c' ~ 3 '" I I I I I I I I I I I g I I ./ I I $ !~i!f!~ i!~l:i : s.n;.;!.;: ~i" .i.. ::I .. C:::I CJ . . .::1 .. i::lga~~ ~ ~;~~ 01 g !l ~ i i I f.g3 j: ~ !~! ; ~ ; i;~ : & c !~-i ; ::I '" i . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ In o " lJ ~ o 5' ~ '" C. ." -: ~ ~ i" i" (IJ ., r CD CD ::> Co z ~ f::i~!!i eli,s:!:; ..i2a:!o=>> tln-z;~-: I .fl;lii lai:ll!! "~t-~in !1":it1 fjb: J.! s rOiO}*i iiUiii I~ . a" - . t ~ ~ 1111 \ ./ BADGER PARK -Q Master Plan Van Doren Hazard Stallings architects engineers planners I I I I I I I I , I , I, I I I I I I I " m (; ~ 'C ~ ~ S" " ., c. ... ~ ~_: ~ i" i" CIl In J::i;!i ~{~lil~ ..c~gt. f~~~ii~: .~.1.3'~ (!g~i';i "if!ith ".R:1!~ ~i'-'fr -;tli:. Q ~iia;i Irl:.~. iil; &~ ~ ";1 !f " \ '- " / I / ~ \ / / L/ r- l1)~ CD ::l Co ~~ UJ , ,. '" ~ i" . ~)I = ~ :t o ~ " '" / //--- --.......--.... _L.__----'\~ I I j ;\-I')'d(\I.\') .__---- 0,,0 _ _--- CATHCART PARK Master Plan I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ." m ~ ~ o _. ~ !!? o _. '" ~ CD '" 0. ." ." '" i. t '" r Cll Cll ::> Co iO~~i~~ "'[:!'-i~! ;5rl~I:I ilo~.;;;~ ~I...: ".u: . I n:llts! '.}~~i h !~g:1!i :,~':JA ,;." f.:;II C h~i!:i !:-iiiai fi~i if . g ~ I~ ~ t ~ ~ . I. 0'010-0 ~ I ; ; \ / ~ .~~ / I / I I /'0 I -, / / ; / --J ~ ~ MANOR PARK f Shorewood,Minnesota City 0 -~ Master Plan Van Doren Hazard Stallings architects engineers planners VaC'D,.'<,~. 51.111,,,-::,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ r!2.~:1lii :1 :i;: i:: .~c;8..f I le-;;;' :I .~-! ifi: Iga:.z!~ -.~iil;g U~ n i: Ij. .: ! I; '9.! .c I .111!:; hl . i ~ . rn! ig . -I . 3: . )> I en t -I m JJ "'C I ): z I I 11-.., '. ________ erfOrC/ '"' ) '~ "-..... 111111 SIL VERWOOD PARK Van Doren Hazard Stallings '--~ coO City of Shorewood .Q v.."(k",,, architects engineers planners St...l....Q<, ~ld'ct = ~ - =- - .- ~ ... ~ "0 0 0 ~ ~ E! ...~ 011) ..c:~ 00= c..~ 01 ~II) 'tl -&. c .- e .. Ull. ~ I I I !! ~ ~ l ou ..". < . c: "" ii: - '; ~ 1 o -'= fI) ~ ~. o s ! o~ 5j :!l c: cu e tall cu fI) :!l c: cu e l:lO cu fI) - '; ~ ,~ ... o 'C 0.. '0 c: E 8 ii: ~ ~I J '; ... f- ~ 'C o 'C 0.. ~~ f~ .. f c! ". ! .. Vi :l ,;, Of 2- !o- 'f Of e- o;: !o- !o- " of r I E !o- E 3! ". ::l " Of of ~ ~ of t u ~ i !0- J! !o- .. .:;: :l I I CI. t t ~ ~ .. :! .. e- 'Ei ;0 ~ ~ u .3 :0- .. ::e 1: ~ -< ;z: CI. ~ Z u.o U VI u.o '" U "gr.; . 0 . . I t~ . . re'" . 0 . . . 0 . ~~ . . . 0 . . ~.':<: . 0 . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I rn t~ I ~ d i. II II h ~ ~ jl ~ ~ ! i Bsi I : III -------~-~~--~---~- I I I = o .- ... u E ... fIl = o U Q,l ... e u = o U ~ < rI.:l ~ -= ... :E i "C = = ~ I I I I I I I I I fIl - ~ - :( * :z o I ~ uO I ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ I ~~ I ~~ O~ 0< I. ~~ O~ F;j~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ N II'l t- N .... 0 0\ 0\ t r-: M' .... N 0\ ~ 0\ .... ..". .... N .... V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) II) e-j:\.,"O .",.... ...... c::: fIl UU~ ... = Q,l e = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ .~ bl) .- e--g~ fIl ..". N fIl .... 0 0\ 0\ .... r-: 0\ .... ~ 0\ < ._ 0 II) 0\ .... ..". .... .... UCQ.!a ... V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) fIl 0 U E-< o~ ~ 8 8= N N ~ r-: ~~ .... V) V) <~ ~ fI)= ~ :E~ II'l V) .... ~ bl) = .... .- fIl ~ CIlS -= ~ .... ~ II) ~ ~ ~ ~ ::s c. 0'" ... .- 0'" ... ~... 0'" ... 0'" ... 0'" ... ~ .S 3 3 .c: .S e 3 o e .S 3 e .S 3 e .S e e ~ u et: .... .... et: et: ... ~ e... ... !:s;i ... ... e... ... II) Eh<{' II) Eh~ II) Eh<{' II) Eh<{' II) Q<{' .E It: EIt: = It: EIt: Eli: Eli: ';J 5 .- .- ';J 5 ';J 5 ';J 5 .00 .00 ';J 0 8 0 .00 :Co :Co ~ .::=jg .~ .::= . '" '::=11) '::=11) .::='" .::= .c:~ .t:Eh II) ! II) 8'~ 8 '" 8.~ ~.~ Eh 8.~ 8 Q bO~ ~ ';J .~ = = II) .... .... .- t-:M 0 II'l Nil) '" 1I'l'" II) .... II) ~~ \IS ~..". '" ~1I'l ......". N\O .... = O\N II'l II'l .... N ..". \0 ..". 0 ; 0 g. ,; e- .C ... :- ~ ~ ~ ... jg ~ ! Cl: ... = .... ~ U = 0 0 ~ fIl 'e "O,;~ - ::s ... .- .... ~ - ,$ ~ Q,l .... 8 ~ ~ ::i Cl:Cl:~ :I:: ~ :E .... N ~ .loll 0 e- ~ = .... .... ~ ... 0 0 "0 ..: - ~ = ... ~ fI) .- ~~... ... 0 ~ U ....fI) j:\., :> ,; - ,; 0 0 C/J.9 J' Cl: .- "0 ~ Cl: ... t- o .... ~ ~ 0 0 'C ~....o ~ .... t- .... ,; .... g~ i 0 =t: t- 12 - .loll i ,; Cl: tl ~ .... ~ ~ ~ e G 1 i ::s = o ._ ~ ~ .... :> ,; 0 . .=e j:\., ~ Cl: .c:"O t!.l 0 .... = Iii ~ .- .... .... = 0 0 .... ~ .... Cl: ,; :f .... ..J ~ bO ~ ,; i::,;a.c: ,; ~e- ~ ~ .!!l ,; Cl: Cl: e = ::s .... Cl: .- Cl: u Cl: Cl: .- 3 ~ = .~ = ~~ ,elt::.J~ ~ .... 6\ 6\U =~ .- :2' ~ ~.:Cl:O = ~ i~ .... ........ u: o .- 8 8 0 :=e 0 .... ,;~ i~ bO ~ o . ,;.S! ..,; eC/J ...~ ..CQ~ ~ 12 -'=~ a' " E-<~ -s~ ~'5~Q) ::s = Cl:.o Cl:,$ := ,":Cl: '> .... .8 i. i. .- .... .... .... = .... "0 .... . ::s =e- ~ :I;~ e ::s :I::ii3~j ~ 8 (5 e . 80 8~ ~.... ~ ."0 fl)t!.l Z fl)8 ~~ ><u E-<Cl: E-<CQ A-S I I I N II CIl CIS =-- I I I I I I I I I I z o I ~ uO I ~~ QZ ::g~ ~~ I ~~ ...::lQ . ~~ I Q~ O~ ~: =~ OQ =Z l'IJ;J I I Wl ... = ~ e ~ .- Wl Wl -< ~ e- =-- c:: ... ....... ::s UUtl. ... Wl o U e-'gg .. 0 <I) U~,!!l f-o 0<1) ~~ <<I) CI)'g ~~ ~ = .... Wl as .c ~ = o .... ... Cl. .f: u Wl ~ ~ ~ .c:~ boCll C::Q ~v.; - - ~ - c:: CU :;fo ~~ ~ g ... ~ ... ~ ... ~ ;g 0- 8.. .S ~ ~ e~ E:= :Eo ~<I) ~.~ ~\() ~ ~ ~ c:: o - cu c:: = ~ -d PG ~ ~ ;at'-- Zx <~ ..: 0 CI)_ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ .... ~ Q~ ':;j 5 - ~ -d PG cu .!lo: :3 <I) CIl e .... <I) 'C .c: U -d PG c:: ~- :08 CIl ... PGci5 ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ;g 0.... .S ~ e.... E~ :E 0 .~ <I) f"l - = .9 ~ ~ cu .... = ..... 0'1 - -d PG . .'0 ~~ ~ t'--.!lo: ... x:3 ~ ~.S :3 .. c.. _ t'-- 'a ... ..,.; 0 's.. ..... 'a ~ 9 0 ~ vi ~ ~ vi ~ ~ ~ I = 0_ Q8 Cii~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cu.... - 8 ~~ =:= 8 0 <I) .~ <I) f"l ... o :; ~ o - t'-- X ~ - ~ cu =:3 0.. - e ~:3 =e- cu .. >ou ~ r-: o - ~ ~ r-: - ~ ~ ~ ~ cu- - 8 e ... u~ =:= 8 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~':;j .... NN o .... 0'1 - ~ 8 -d PG...: .of-o ::s cu 05 e;-- = ~ ::s= 8~ o ~ t'--~ f"l ~ 8 II) ...;- f"l ~ ~ ..c ~ 8 II) ...;- f"l ~ ~ ...;- f"l ~ ;g 0- .S ~ e.... <I) E:= :Eo ~ 8 II) ~ 9 ~ -d .~ ~ : ~ <I) ~ 0.::: !ii .c e = '::::3 0 ~ e- ~ 0\ U -8 ~.... -; -d.9 e PG ~ ~ .8 8~ ~ ~ .... Q~ ':;j 5 ~ ...;- ~ ~ ...;- ~ ;a c.. .~ e e 00 j ~ ~ ~ II) ... ::s .... CIl Z CIl = .a -; e cu PG 8 ~ ...;- ..c _ f"l ~ ~ 8 ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ g N ~ o ~ ...;- N ~ 8 II) vi t'-- - ~ ~ o f-o A-6 I I I ~ : ili : 'j! i : II I r-- <I: . c:: ~ E::: - ~ ~ Q) ... o .c (/) 0 8 ~ i ~q;~ Wl ~~ > o~ ~ ~ . i 0 @ ~ J!l K c J!l Q) c e Q) an e ~ an ~ - '; - ~ '; wlB ~ ~ i~ ~ 'C 0 'C 'C 0 ~ 'C ~ '0 C ~ 0 t.I ti: Q) (/) .. f 71 I ! I, d Ii ./ II -~~~----~~~-~~--~~-