The URL can be used to link to this page

030992 CC Reg AgP ~ . ' CITY OP SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ~. 1. 7:00 P.M. - CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Gagne stover Daugherty Lewis Mayor Brancel C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Meeting/Work session - February 24, 1992 (Att.No.2A-Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Consent Aqenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein A. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Proclaiming March as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month (Att.NO.3A-ReSolution) B. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Establishing precinct Boundaries within the city of Shorewood (Att.No.3B-Resolution) C. Motion to Approve a Resolution Accepting Election Judges for the Presidential Primary (Att.No.3C-Resolution) D. Motion to Approve an Extension for Submitting Final Plat - Neitge Addition (Att.No.3D-planner's Memo and Letter of Request) E. Motion to Accept City Hall Cleaning Contract - Assured Office systems (Att.NO.3E-contract) ~ ., 4. PARK COMMISSION - Gordon Lindstrom ~ ~ A. Report on Park Commission Meeting - February 25, 1992. B. Recommendation for 1992 Capital Improvement Program Project. .. COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 9, 1992 Page Two 4. PARK COMMISSION Continued - Gordon Lindstrom C. Silverwood Park 1. Consideration of Site Concept Plan. 2. Consideration of Letter of Agreement with VanDoren Hazard & Stallings. (Att.No.4C-Attachment) D. Report on Scheduled Trail Plan Public Informational Meeting. E. Authorize Discussion with City of Chanhassen on Cathcart Park. F. Park Commission Telephone Survey Results. (Att.No.4F-Survey Report) 5. PLANNING COMMISSION A. Report on Planning commission Meeting - February 18, 1992. B. Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment - L-R District (Att.No. - Planner's Memo and Proposed Ordinance) 6. 7:15 PM - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATING A PORTION OF GARDENDALE ROAD - THOMAS DOHERTY (Att.No.6-Planner's Memo) 7 . 7: 30 PM - PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR CDBG PROGRAM YEAR XVIII - PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS (Att.No.7-Resolution and Public Hearing Notice) 8. PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY - Presentation bv EOS Architecture 1. Review Project Plans and Cost Estimates. 2. A Resolution Approving Plans and Specs and Ordering Authorization to Advertisement for Bids. (Att.No.8-Cost Estimates and ReSOlution) 9. CONSIDERATION OF 1992 SPRING CLEAN UP (Att.No.9-Administrator's Memo, Article, and BFI, Letter of Agreement) .. ~ 10. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR .. COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 9, 1992 Page Three ~--,., 11. STAFF REPORTS 1. City Attorney 2. City Engineer' A. Report on participation in the regulatory and warning sign replacement program 3~ Planning Director 4. City Administrator A. city Policy - City Values (Att.No.11-4A-Policy) B. Report on Codifying Ordinance 250 - Municipal Fees (Att.No.11-4B-Letter) 12. COUNCIL REPORTS 1. Mayor Brancel A. Annual Easy Race - May 3, 1992 (Att;No.12A-Letter of. Request) B. Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan - ,City of Orono (Att.No.12B-Report) 2. Councilmembers 13. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CLAIMS (Att.No.-Claims) , .. JCH.al 3/05/92 MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1992 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM 3A - This is a resolution proclaiming the month of March as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness month as requested by the CFS Association of Minnesota. AGENDA ITEM 3B - This resolution approves one precinct boundaries along Birch Bluff Road. residences from Precinct I to Precinct III. This after the Presidential Primary. AGENDA ITEM 3C - The resolution approves the list of election judges for the Presidential election. small change in It moves seven will take effect ~. AGENDA ITEM 3D - The motion to be voted on here is to approve an extension until September 9, 1992 for submitting final plat for the three lot division at 25985 smithtown Road (Jim and Barb Neitge). This is recommended and consistent with past practice. AGENDA ITEM 3E - The previous City Hall cleaner recently resigned due to other committments. Staff recommends the City Council approve by motion an agreement with Jeffrey Reinhart to begin cleaning City Hall at a rate of $59 per week. This is $5 per week higher than the previous agreement but includes trash removal and all cleaning supplies. This is more efficient than requiring personnel from Public Works to collect and remove trash. ..' AGENDA ITEM 4B - The Park Commission is looking at the early part of 1993 for a Park referendum. They have determined that with or without a referendum grading and pond excavation of Silverwood Park should be done in 1992. The Park fund has a balance of $30,000 and we are anticipating an additional $25,000 during 1992. The Council might then consider approving a $55,000 budget: $5,000 for engineering and project management; and $50,000 for grading and excavation and miscellaneous. AGENDA ITEM 4C - The City Council is asked to review and approve the general concept plan for Silverwood Park and approve the Letter of Agreement with VanDoren Hazard & stallings for engineering and project management for this project. This is a Park Commission recommendation. AGENDA ITEM 4D - citizens will be asked for comment on the proposed trail plan. Staff and Park Commission members will be available to present the plan Tuesday, 3/24; 2:00 - 4:00 pm & 7:00 - 9:00 pm. AGENDA ITEM 4E - The Park Commission would like the Administrator to discuss very informally with the City of Chanhassen questions concerning Cathcart Park (ie. program scheduling, special assessment policies, and capital improvements). AGENDA ITEM 4F - The results of the Park Commissions telephone survey are enclosed in the packet. 140 Shorewood residents were telephoned. A one page executive summary is page one of the report. The report is quite readable and I encourage you to spend 10 - 15 minutes reviewing it so that you can draw your own conclusions. AGENDA ITEM SB This proposed requirement from the 75 to a 50 foot district. The Planner's memorandum would make us consistent with Regulations. AGENDA ITEM 0 - 7:15 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - The city council will hold the required public hearing on the potential vacation of a portion of Gardendale Road. It is recommended that the Council however not take any action at this meeting but rather wait until further Planning Commission input is received for the April 13 meeting. ordinance would change the Lakeshore set back in the L-R explains in detail that this state Shore land Management . AGENDA ITEM 7 - 7:30 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - This is the required public hearing for the community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) . When the hearing notice was prepared the City of Shorewood's allocation was $22,779 since then we have been notified that our allocation has been reduced to $22,358. That is a reduction of $421. I have asked the CDBG Program office to prepare a memorandum for us explaining the effects of taking the funds that had been set aside for the housing rehabilitation program and using those funds for renovations required by the American Disability Act. That communication has not arrived at this point. Further, the Southshore Senior Center asked the -City to consider an additional $2,000 to $3,000 of funding. That request is attached in the packet. It should be noted that the request for funding does not have to be returned to Hennepin County until April 15. So if the Council wishes to hold off on the decision until their next full meeting on April 13 there would be time to do so. AGENDA ITEM 8 -Representatives from EOS Architecture will make a presentation on the plans and specifications for the Public Works facili ty. They will also review the updated budget. The resolution authorizing advertisement for bids is enclosed. . AGENDA ITEM 9 - It is my hope that the City Council was pleased with the way last years Spring Cleanup went. We are proposing the same effort for 1992. The Council should approve the Letter of Agreement with BFI. AGENDA ITEM 12-4A- If the City Council agrees with the proposed City Values which was discussed at the last Council work session, a motion approving the proposed value would be in order. AGENDA ITEM 4B - The City Council should be aware that the Ordinance bringing all the various fees and charges together in one location in the City Code will cost up to $1,500 in order to bring our Code up to date. This will be a one time major expense. CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24. 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB 0 ROAD PAGE 1 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel. Councilmembers Gagne. Daugherty and Lewis. City Administrator Hurm. City Engineer Dresel. City Finance Director Rolek. City Planner Nielsen and Public Works Director Zdrazil. . Absent: Councilmember Stover C. REVIEW AGENDA Gagne moved. Daugherty seconded to adopt the Agenda. Motion carried - 4/0 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Meeting Minutes of February 10. 1992. Gagne mpved. Lewis seconded to approve the City Council Minutes of February 10. 1992. Motion carried - 4/0 3. . CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION NO. 19-92 RESOLUTION NO. 20-92 RESOLUTION NO. 21-92 RESOLUTION NO. 22-92 Daugherty moved. Gagne seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and Adopt the Resolutions Thereino' A. To Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 19-92 "A Resolution Approving Refuse Collector's License." B. To Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 20-92 "A Resolution Making Appointments to the Park Commission. Planning Commission and Senior Housing and Services Task Force. with Ken Vogel added as the seventh Senior Housing and Services Task Force membet- . " C. To Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 21-92 "A Resolution Approving A Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat for Gideon's Cove P.U.D." cZA 1 . . REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1992 - PAGE 2 D. Motion to Approve Application for Tree Planting Program Grant 1992. E. To Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-92 "A Resolution Amending the 1992 General Fund Budget - City Engineer." Motion carried - 4/0 4. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO THE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Gagne moved. Daugherty seconded to adjourn the meeting to a Work Session at 7:05 P.M. Motion carried - 4/0 GENERAL AND LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NUMBER 00-00166-02 Checks issued since February 7. 1992 Check No. 8507-8576 LIQUOR GENERAL $ 53.249.90 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $ 29.026.888 $ 82,276.78 Checks for Council approval Checks No. 8577-8603 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL $ 54.578.96 TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST $136.855.74 CHECK REGISTER FOR FEBRUARY 11. 1991 PAYROLL Checks no. 205903/205952 LIQUOR $2.957.18 GENERAL $15.472.52 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $18.429.70 RECONVENE Mayor Braneel reconvened the meeting at 7:07 P.M. .,:- REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1992 - PAGE 3 Administrator Hurm presented the City Council Work Calendar and a partial list of the City of Shorewood Accomplishments for 1991. He asked the Council if they had any additions. The Council had no additions. Hurm reviewed the Shorewood Statement of Purpose and Statement of City Values. Brancel asked if the Council wished to review the Board Member Manual. The Council decided not to review the Manual. Daugherty said he felt the City Newsletter did not reach the people. He said the newsletter should be more visible. Finance Director Rolek suggested the newsletter could be redesigned and mailed out quarterly and professionally typeset. . Hurm said Beverly Von Feldt will be attending a desktop publishing class and can ask how the newsletter can be updated. Hurm presented the Staff Concensus Sheet of Issues Facing the City in 1992. The staff prioritized the issues according to the following system: 1A High Council Control; High Impact 1B High Council Control; Low Impact 2A Low Council Control; High Impact 2B Low Couoncil Control; Low Impact The staff also estimated the amount of staff time required for each issue according to a scale of 1 to 10 with one requiring the least amount of time. Hurm then asked the Council to prioritze the issues. They used a 1 to 5 rating system with 5 being urgent and most important, down to one being not urgent and not important. He asked them to attempt to have equal numbers of fives, fours, threes, twos and ones. . Gagne asked how much staff time was devoted to the list. Hurm said several hours. A summary of the Council priority consensus is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Daugherty said he thought the rating procedure was creative and positive~ Hurm said the staff will develop a report based on the priorities list and draft an action plan. Gagne asked Hurm if the City had requested RFP's from banks. He thought this item was requested by the Council in January. Lewis and Daugherty concurred. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1992 - PAGE 4 Hurm said it was his understanding the RFP's were to be requested somtime during the coming year. The Council indicated requesting the RFP's from Banks IS an immediate priority. Hurm agreed to do this. Public Works Director Zdrazil said the Little League Field at Freeman Park has not yet been satisfactorily completed. He said work remains to be done in the spring. Daugherty asked Rolek what procedure is used to review where City funds are invested. . Rolek stated there are State guidelines for investing the City's money. He said he reviews the idle funds and analyzes the cash flow and bonded debt service paYment schedules. Rolek informed Daugherty he uses five different investment firms and banks to acquire the best instrument and yield for the City's investments. He said the City's funds are invested in short and long term investments, depending upon the liquidity needs of the City. . Daugherty asked the average dollar amount invested. Rolek said about 4.5 million. Daugherty asked Rolek if an investment advisor is used. Rolek said investment advisors are not commonly used by cities. Daugherty asked the rest of the Council if they thought an advisor should be used. Lewis said he thought one might be helpful. . Rolek said the investment of City funds is part of the day to day operation of the City and about 15% of his time is allocated to it. He said it would still require his time even if an advisor was used. Rolek also stated the liquidity of funds is important to consider. However, he said it is possible the City may receive a better return if the money was actively managed. Hurm said the advisor would also take a fee and therefore the return would have to be greater. Rolek ~aid the City's return has been good but there are no figures available to compare the return with other cities. Gagne asked if the guidelines for the City are different than tor an individual. Hurm and Rolek said they are. Gagne said the staff should find out how many other cities use a financial consultant. Hurm said this may be available from the State Finance Office or the League of Minnesota Cities. Daugherty asked that a Financial Consultant be added to the Issues List as number 43 with a 4 priority. Lewis agreed. The Council did not object. 4 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1992 - PAGE 5 ADJOURNMENT OF WORK SESSION Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to adjourn the Work Session at 8:22 P.M. Motion carried - 4/0 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Katie Snyder Recording Secretary ATTEST: BARBARA BRANCEL, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 5 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL ISSUE PRIORITY RATING February 24, 1992 Hiqhest Priority GrouDinqs Priority Ratinq 5 and 4+ Newsletter format update........................................ Complete Public Works facility.................................. RFP.- Banks.................................................... -. . .pecial Assessment Policy for street improvements............... ater-review alternatives and establish focused policies........ Priority Ratinq 4 SLMPSD contract ends December 31, 1992.......................... Pursue joint efforts with neighboring municipalities............ Finalize Church Road project................. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Challenge MWCC regarding sewer charges.......................... Consider investment manager............................ . . . . . . . . . Elderly Housing................................................. Change in budget format to tie expenditures to Council policies and goals............................................ Review and update elP........................................... MSA designations and designs.................................... Computerize: Property Records, Building Permit/Tracking and . Clerks Index........................o.......................... ~pdate Comprehensive Plan............................... ........ Mid Range priority GrouDinqs Priority Ratinq 4- and 3+ Time Involvement (1) Ratinq 2 3 3 5 L 20 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 7 10 45 Review Hennepin County Paramedic responses within Shorewood..... 1 Review access restrictions-Christmas Lake....................... 1 Loss of recycling markets/city drop-off center.................. 2 Rental housing code............................................. 2 Establish an evaluation/bonus pay system........................ L 10 (1) Range 1 = least time involvement to 10 = most time involvement ( * ) Mandated Page 1 of 2 Mid Ranqe Priority Groupinqs Priority Ratinq 3 Final plans for City Hall parking area.......................... 2 Prepare a Park Plan C (begin implementation).................... 3 Consider municipal contracting for garbage service.............. 3 Prepare for Park referendum..................................... 6 Surface Water Management Program - establish drainage districts and stormwater utility...... '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L 21 Third Ranqe Priority Grou~inqs Priority Ratinq 3- *Fill Public Works Foreman position............................. Establish City Policy Manual and Procedures..................... Review Code Book-Repeal/Replace Outdated Ordinances............. .*UPdate Shorel~nd Manageme~t Regulations........................ pdate Pay EqUJ.ty Job Profl.les................................... Priority Ratinq 2+ Safety Plan - Parade of Homes................................... 1 Review Hennepin county Paramedic responses within Shorewood..... 1 Consider a snow emergency parking ban ordinance................. 1 *Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act................ 2 Review effectieness of utility maintenance practices............ 2 Sewer equalization charge ordinance - update.................... 2- 10 Priority Rating 2 and 1+ Park land inventory............................................. .etro concern for residential zoning/fiscal disparities.......... evelop an orientation program for new Council and Commission members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Update Flood Plain Regulations.......................... . . . . . . . . Update job descriptions................................. .. . . . . . . Improve disaster preparedness................................... TOTAL (1) Range 1 = least time involvement to 10 = most time involvement (*) Mandated Page 2 of 2 JCH/al 2/28/92 (priority) Time Invol vernent (1) Rating 2 3 3 4 .L 17 1 1 2 3 4 .L 12 135 . . RESOLUTION -92 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF MARCH AS AWARENESS OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS) MONTH WHEREAS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a serious illness marked by debilitating fatigue and weakness, accompanied by flu- like sYmptoms and cognitive impairment; and WHEREAS, victims often experience sYmptoms of sufficient severity to interfere with their participation in the activities of daily life for many months or years, and the loss to society of productive people in their prime earnings years is great; and WHEREAS, Because some physicians are unfamiliar with CFS, routine diagnostic tests fail to suggest a specific disease, and insurance and disability compensators may delay or deny CFS-related claims, the burdens for CFS sufferers are even greater; and WHEREAS, There is an alarming lack of understanding and concern about how CFS impacts individuals, diminishing their ability to enjoy life, disrupting education and employment, and creating tremendous medical expenses; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnesota continue to provide reliable information to the afflicted and their families, the health care providers and the public to stimulate interest in finding effective treatments and a cure for CFS. FINALLY, we urge all residents to become aware of this disorder and support efforts to find a cure. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 9th day of March, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3A CFS Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association 01 Mlnne.ola Honorary Member ofthe Board The Honorable Rudy Perpich Board 01 Directors Judy BasS(', President Brian Lutterman, Vice President Sheryl Kolsum, Treasurer Julie Klotzbach, Secretary John Seagard Bill LaVictoire Penny Crandall Medical Advisors Allan C. Kind, M.D. Phillip Ie. Peterson, M.D. Christian G. Schrock, M.D. Nurse Advocate Jeri Stroud, RN. Advisors Karalee Beierschmitt Linda Beierschmitt, AA Terrie Cummings, RN., B.S.N. Richard Kofsky, Ph. D., L.c.P. Beth van den Berg, B.S.,O.T.R MEMBER "COMBINED- ~ OF MINNESOTA ...,.. P. O. Box 385036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612-943-2769 CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating langue February 5, 1992 lef- t;.-O I RE: REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION TO DESIGNATE MARCH AS CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROlVIE AWARENESS MONTH Dear Mayor, I am writing to urge your favorable consideration of the enclosed letter from one of your constituents, which requests that you issue an official proclamation which designates March, 1992 as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month in your community. CFS is a life-altering illness which has been recognized and studied by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. It differs from the typical feelings of fatigue by degree and duration and includes an array of other debilitating symptoms. Please see the enclosed literature for more information about CFS. . Volunteers for the CFS Association of Minnesota are working in conjunction with the National Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association, which is sponsoring a nationwide effort to encourage government officials to proclaim for the first time an entire month for CFS awareness. We work closely with this organization because of our mutual goal to promote medically accurate information about CFS. We have enclosed a sample CFS proclamation, similar to the one used in past years by Governor Carlson, for your consideration. Additionally, we request that you present the proclamation to representatives of our organization, possibly at a city council meeting, around the end of February or early in March. We would also be honored to have your participation in our awareness celebration which will be held from 1-4 p.m., Sunday, March 15, at Abbott Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis. . Thank you for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious health concern in Minnesota. Sincerely, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA CkdffJ3a.tJ<U- kdy Basso President Enclosures RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD WHEREAS, The boundaries of Legislative Districts 43A and 43B have changed; and WHEREAS, this boundary change results in Precinct I being moved from Legislative District 43A to Legislative District 43B; and WHEREAS, the new boundary line separating Legislati ve District 43A from Legislative District 43B results in a change in the precinct boundary line between Precinct I and Precinct III; and . WHEREAS, said change moves the following addresses from Precinct I to Precinct III: 25360 Birch Bluff Road 25370 Birch Bluff Road 25380 Birch Bluff Road 25480 Birch Bluff Road 25510 Birch Bluff Road 25530 Birch Bluff Road 25560 Birch Bluff Road . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shorewood city council that said Precinct boundary change is approved, and Precinct boundaries established as set in the Precinct boundary map attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said change shall take effect on September 15, 1992. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 9th day of March, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3B =~~~~~~~.,:~::2~~~~~~~~~M~=~=~~==~~~~=:'.~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~w2~~~.~..~~~~=~~~~~~~~~n~ ~~J~JJ~~6~~~~~~~~!~A66~~~6~~~~~~~6!ti~~~~0~~~~~~b~~~~6~~~!k~~~A!6~~,A~~~~~~~&~~~~~ -: II:: ~ ........ ... :;1 i~~~_. J!~l ~ ~l. u u ~~.~ '~""'u.. ~ h.U!.. iE ~v ~ ~.. ~ 4 .J .. u ..." ~ .... ... t:... uS. ... Q.-i g !"" ~ .. l'1 : c .'11 ...:; .. c 'i ~ ~.. :; .. . C ....:1 .~ ~ 1 0 ~ ~ .~ ~ : ~ . "0 ~ ;.=~g~"O ~~o~....:~.~ l'1~eu :=~~u ~ ~.. ~&~.~~:=* ;~~'~g~~uu.. ~~..u~:~u~=~~ ~~~ ~~:. 1~i~v~:~.~i!ii:~a~~i~i~~1~w~;'~!~i~aail1~a3ccc.~~~I~~i:~3!3~~~jSll=!!~lll~~:~.E:~:! _.<<&!~~c~~~~~~~ l:~~"'~~~e!~~~":u.~~~~DO."'~~~]0~~~~~~:K..~~:.~"'~~~~~~~o~~t:~~8~~; .........ccc....a~ .._.~ ~.~~.. ..~c.*..~i~h~.Z~....~~~.t .ul...~~.aa. ~~.ut. ......t c" ..~ ;~;~~~~jl.......~c~~~~::~"o~~~:;~~::.~==111~=~=~~~:<~~~:~J!~:=:~~.~:i==.::::=~~~:~ll~~~ x1:~l~~~lliii~il!~:~Ob:~~:::~~~~~~~~~~~~~aa~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~::~~~~~:~~~~~;~j~~ "~~~ ~~ 0 .~ ND~_~~hh .... OOO~D~~O _~ ~~h~M~~.~ N M ~h ~ ~_~f... m ~~ _4.___4~""MM__MN~~_""~_N_NM""__~~_~___MN__""4C~_~~~___-____~-~_~~__"....~-----.'....~__m.~.~ ~~!~~~u!J~~~~~~A~~&~~~A~&~A~~~J~~J~6~~~~~~~~~~~0~~~~J~A~~~~~A~~~~~~~~~~~~A~~A~~~ . ~ VI . 1.~~ :-: .: .~: '1 -:1 ~ ~u . . t "'"'d: .~;~~. ........e w . u 1 oa...l ~.~ II .~~ ~X...D O~~~~~. ~ "0 ~ 0 .. ~.. "0 ~ Ct.V ; = : o:~3~~~QII~tk ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~A-~"~: 1~ ~ ~.'~.~ t ~MU~.= ~~~ Q~; ~~ "0.. U ~ f k _~_ ~~~.~ ~! ~..~ ~~g.~~~~~. h~~~~ u o~ ~~ ~uQ>..~~ .c.uc ~.t a~~:~~ .:ca ~11~1...&~~~~~.e~6 ~ : g....:o~...:~~.~d:cc~~~~~fu~~~~~~~5:u~::t!j~::~~ o~.1~~:e~13 : ~ ~~.~:i~~~=k~:~~:ll1~~ii:ii;~!!:~l~~~~ai!il:~!:~~:~:~c~ei:j=:~i~;a:ii!ij:~!31~g ~ ~ Ie.. J .. t k AI .. : ... J 1 ... _ :. "0 ~ .14 II .... ., .. lot U . . .. . u . u t' c c c. t...... .... ~ .W .... . II .....04 . II II"''' .04.... ., ...... t c ,.J .= -:. =- .. .. I U :: ~ ..:: .: ~ !!~Mi~r!!iii~~!~if1~~~~J::~i~il!!I!!ii~E!~!!!~~~i~i~~1a!!~!l!a;i;~~~~~~~~:~!:~ i ~ ~<~~~.:A~~.~_~.A~u3u~GBu666u6uuuuOuuuo~o~~~~~~w~~~~~~~~u~u~~~===~~H~W,.J,.J,.J,.J~~,.J~x 1 ~ I ro u o lo' LL l!J ", l''\i~'''' 'D ~ C/) ~N za:cn ~ :Se:(cn >- ~ .. C T"" .- ~ OZ czcO O:JUl .. <: O=>-I lJ..Oo;t ~ 00- 0;;:0.,- .. .... a.WZn; ... ~ ~ma: <to:a:o a -.J ....0.. ~own. a:ue:( :CZ U)Z OZLL w x-O :I;: ::! C/)UC/) ~e:( a.. ~ t;- '" ::: I nl\D I Ul.!!! JI~lIIl1ltllllmm~il~~/i1 I~I' ~ lIij ~liliUlh i I ~lli~. I.'...!....".:........:..:::.."..;.:..::..:..:.: 1-.... -,'...." ,... C 1 I I ~ . I t I I I ,AVU UU:,QlArIIt i ~.;1~ ! ....... 0 0 ... .. ::: ~ u"" "'... a.~!!]! "0 Q . . . .. c ~ _1_..... ~_::: .:g~..,,",,,, a ~,tl:':~ ~j~~~~ ~ o <'oJ ~ ~ h ~. := m <0 '0 <'oJ . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES WHEREAS, the City Administrator/Clerk has submitted for approval a list of election judges to officiate at the 1992 Presidential Primary election; and WHEREAS, said list appears to be correct and complete in all respects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of ~he City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the City Council hereby approves the list of election judges, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, to officiate at the 1992 Presidential Primary election. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 9th day of March, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator/Clerk JCH/sn C:\RESOLUTI.ONS\ELECTION.JDG 3C- Precinct I Sue Grahn 5945 Eureka Rd Chairman Precinct III Elvera Hoops Chairman 26755 smithtown Road Mary Reutiman 5965 Eureka Road Katie Snyder 5985 Eureka Road Jeannine Picha 5930 Seamans Drive Kay Johnson 5875 Cathcart Drive Irene Kronholm 23630 McLain Road Judy McCuskey 5250 Howards Point Road Precinct II Ed Boltman 5710 Grant Lorenz Road Jo Hermann Chairman Carmen Doughty 200740 Garden Road Elaine Larson 27750 Woodside Road . Precinct IV Pat Hannum 5350 st. Albans Bay Road Barb Thibault Chairman 4565 Enchanted Point Nancy Peterson 21355 Christmas Lane Carmelita Smith 4345 Enchanted Drive Alice Vosmek 20615 Manor Road Jean Englund 4545 Enchante Drive Mary Schmitt 20725 Radisson Inn Road Pat Murphy 4360 Enchanted Drive . Les Feichtinger 19480 Shady Hills Road Judy Hagen 5125 Shady Island Road Norma Hogle 6025 Mill Street June Hopp 20175 Manor Road Sam Jordon 20665 Radisson Inn Road Sue Ryan 6100 McKinley Circle Carol Ameling 6015 McKinley Place EXHIBIT A MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L . Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD.~MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council , FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 3 March 1992 RE: Neitge Addition - Extension of Deadline for Submitting Final Plat FILE NO. 405 (91.15). Jim a.l1dLBarbNeitge have requested. an.extensionof time to,.submit annal plat for their three- lot division at 25985 Smithtown Road. Their preliminary plat was approved in September of last year. Section 1202.04 Subd. 1. a. of the Subdivision Ordinance provides the Council with discretion .10. grant such . an' extension. , The six. month extension is consistent with past similar approvals. It is recommended that the applicants be given until September to submit their final plat. cc: Jim Hnrm Joel Dresel Dave Sellergren Jim and Barb Neitge 3D A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I . . Worksheet for City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attention: Ms. Anne Latter #474-3236 Entrance and Reception area General Offices Private Offices Office Washrooms Kitchenette Duties Entrance doors and glass Tile floors mopped Floors vacuumed Waste baskets emptied Desk tops cleaned when cleared Dusting of cabinets and ledges Washrooms all fIxtures cleaned and serviced, floors mopped Conference room table cleaned and counters Dust blinds and window sills Clean ceiling light flXtures/baseboardslledges Vacuum and polish chairs Defrost refrigerator/entry door framing 2/11/92 wee'kL Y fA.) EEJt.L Y I, J'E"l'!' X.l...Y wcekL ~ wE~i(.LY W~"L Y IVeeK.L y wE6Jt..L Y Wet;){.L.Y tl.let!:U Y w~~~'- V '1 )F:~/I../'Y Lv ~l!;)(.L Y ./J1 a>>'1'A L Y q'n(,L )I tit It/. Y As ~e'/) 1) Cleaning to take place once per week (generally will be performed between Friday-Monday night). 2) City of Shorewood to purchase paper products and bags. 3) Work to begin 1 week after notification. (Approximately 2/29/92) 4) Weekly fee of $59/week to be paid on the 1st of each month. (or terms agreed to) - fee includes purchase of normal cleaners by Assured Office Systems. - Assured Office Systems to empty trash (W€cl<l.Y) Comments: Agreed to bY~ ~..;.;t,;;;;l- 8/~ /9;1 Agreed to by 3[ MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator DATE: March 5, 1992 RE: Park Fund . December 31, 1991 Balance $29,162.00 Estimated Interest 1991 $524.00 $25.000.00 Estimated Park Dedication Fees 1992 $54,686.00 Estimated Interest 1992 $ 514.00 $55,200.00 . $55,200 should be available for the Silverwood Project Preliminary Budget: $ 5,000 Engineering and project Management 5,200 Miscellaneous Costs and contingency 45.000 Grading/Excavation/Seeding $ 55,200 JCH.al A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 1c 03-05-1992 10:01AM FROM VANDOREN HAZARD STALLINGS TO 4740128 P.02 ~ VanDoren Hazard . Stallings. Inc. At"'cl'lltecee . Engineers. F'Ianners March 5, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm, City Manager City of Shorewood 5755 Country Qub Road Shorewoo~ MN 55331 Re: Proposal for preparation of grading plans & specifications at Silverwood Park. . Dear Mr. Hurm: Thank you for the opportunity to prepare plans and specifications and act as project managers for grading and pond excavation at Silverwood Park. We are prepared to proceed immediately with the work necessary to complete the project in a timely manner. This letter contains information regarding scope of services, project schedule and proposed fee. Scope of Services -:~ As discussed at the February 25, 1992 Shorewood Park Commission meeting, there is $55,200 budgeted in the 1992 Shorewood CIP for grading and pond excavation in Silverwood Park. In preparing for construction we propose the following services be provided by Van Doren - Hazard - Stallings, Inc.: . . Survey City land and easement to Silver Lake. . Detail grading plans for a completed park, including pond excavation, with an erosion control element. . Cost estimates. . Project budget and schedule. . Administering bid process - specs. . General project management, including acquiring permits (ie. U.S. Corp of Engineers, Watershed District) and approve pay vouchers. . Staking. . Work with the Public Works Director at least weekly on inspection of the project. Project Sebedule The timely pTogress and completion of this project is important to the endeavors of the City. A proposed schedule is outlined below. . City Council approval and authorization for bid. . Contract awarded . Substantial completion of project April 13, 1992 May 11, 1992 June 26, 1992 4~ ......,_ _"'_._ ,,....-""... --1"\ ."." 03-05-1992 10:02AM FROM VANDOREN HAZARD STALLINGS TO 4740128 P.03 Mr. Jim Hurm March 5, 1992 Page 2 Proposed Fee Based upon the scope of this project, we propose a fee on an hourly basis not to exceed $5,000 plus necessary reimbursable expenses associated with the project. We propose to bill for these services in accordance with the attached hourly rate schedule. Reimbursable expenses for printing, copying, shipping, mileage and facsimile will be invoiced at the rates indicated. If needed, additional services will be billed for at the same hourly rate schedule. . If this proposal is satisfactory please sign and return one copy to us for our records at your earliest convenience. H you have any questions or concerns feel free to contact me. Sincerely, VAN DOREN-HAZARD-STALLINGS,INC. ~ t. ~ Bruce L. Chamberlain Project Manager Accepted by: . ./!?.-yfl JT~ Max J. Daubenberger, P.E. Vice President Date: BLC/MID~ Ene. SLV1U'~. L52 03-05-1992 10:02RM FROM"VRNDOREN HRZRRD STRLLINGS TO VAN OOREN-BAZARD-STALI.INGS, INC. CtJRRER'J! HOURLY RA!rE SCHEDULE (1992) SALARIES (INCLUDING OVERHEAD AND PROFIT . Engineers, Architects, Planners (Principal) Engineers, Architects, Planners (Senior) Engineers, Architects, Planners Engineers, Architects, Planners (Assistant) Senior EnqineeringTechnician senior Draftsperson and Design Detailer Planner/Landscape Architect (Assistant) Draftsperson and Technician Junior Draftsperson su~eyor (Chief) Surveyor (Assistant) Surveyor (Aide) CAD Technician Photogrammetrist Clerical, Administrative, Etc. Expert Witness (Trial) DIRECT COSTS . Mileage Electrostatic Copies Per Diem (Pe~ Day) Blue Line Prints (Sq. Ft.) polyester Film (Sq. Ft.) Computer (Hour) CAn/Work Station PQr hour Fax - Incoming - First Page - Following pages Outgoing - First Page - Following Pages Telephone Travel Outside printing Testing Services 4740128 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Actual Actual Actual Actual P.04 $ 75.00 $ 70.00 $ 58.00 $ 54.00 $ 50.00 $ 40.00 $ 36.00 $ 33.00 $ 25.00 $ 56.00 $ 28.00 $ 22.50 $ 35.00 $ 31.50 $ 36.00 $135.00 .25 .10 45.00 .14 4.75 50.00 32.50 l.SO 1.00 2.50 1.00 Cost Cost Cost Cost . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION RESULTS OF A TELEPHONE OPINION SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY THE COMMISSION IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, 1992 . LlF . . TABLE OF CONTENTS I. E:JcE!C:lIti"4! SlII11I11Cll1f.............................................................fJCl!JE! 1 II. Nei!Jhborhood SCll11plE!....................................................... .fJCl!JE! 2 III. QlIE!stion ResponSE!......... ....... ............................................. fJCl!JE! 2 I". Cross TClbllICltions...............................................................fJCl!JE! II ". Appendix A. SliNey DOClll11ent B. Nei!Jhborhood MClp I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Shorewood Park Commission determined that the first step in planning for a park referendum would be a telephone opinion survey. with the aid of City staff and Judy Marshik of Quik Research Inc. the Commission designed a ten question survey instrument to acquire opinion data (see Appendix A). It was determined that 140 Shorewood residents would be surveyed in late January and early February. This was just before the Minnetonka School District referendum was held. Following a training meeting the Commissioners began making their calls from a randomly selected list of Shorewood telephone numbers. Those interviewed were screened. Only property tax paying Shorewood registered voters were surveyed. This report is the results . of the survey. The second section of the report (II Neighborhood Sample) illustrates the locations of the completed surveys. A map of the City identifying neighborhoods by number is Appendix B. Section III is the result of the ten questions asked. Section IV is a series of "crosstabs", that is, six questions were cross tabbed with question 7 with answers broken down for those who would vote for or against the park improvement referendum. There is a lot of data in this report. Because the results are computerized more cross-tabulations could be done if requested. However, at this point, a few specific observations can be made: . Slightly less than half of those surveyed use our parks or trails . 53% use trails most; 47% use parks most . . 56% of those responding would support a referendum now And a few general conclusions can be drawn: . There is good support for a park referendum . There are ways that the "positives" could be reinforced and enhanced: tie in trail expansion, and encourage park usage because park users are generally more positive. It is our hope that those reading this report will find it very easy to understand and interpret. The reader should then be able to make meaningful observations and additional conclusions. II. NEIGHBORHOOD SAMPLE: PAGE 2 Neighborhoods were those defined for the water survey (see map - Appendix B). Neighborhood 11 consists of the islands which were not included in the water survey. NEIGHBORHOOD # NUMBER SURVEYED PERCENTOFSURVEY . 1 19 13.6 2 12 8.6 3 9 6.4 4 1 .7 5 11 7.9 6 9 6.4 7 28 20.0 8 12 8.6 9 11 7.9 10 26 18.6 11 2 1.4 TOTAL 140 100.0 . III. QUESTION RESPONSES: 1. During the past year have you or your family used any of Shorewood's Parks? ANSWER FREQUENCY PERCENT Yes 68 48.6 No 71 50.7 N/A 1 .7 TOTAL 140 100 - 2. If answer to #1 is "no", why? PAGE 3 ANSWER FREOUENCY They don't meet my needs 14 Age /Physical condition of respondent 11 No time 9 Kids grown 6 Not aware of location 5 No interest/not attractive to me 4 - Not convenient or within walking distance 4 ! Just don't use 3 Go . t~ cabin/lake home in Wisconsin 3 Live on lake 2 New to area 2 . 3. During the past year have you or your family used any of Shorewood's Trails? ANSWER FREQUENCY PERCENT Yes 68 48.6 No 71 50.7 N/A 1 .7 TOTAL 140 100 . 4. If answer to #3 is "no", why? ANSWER FREOUENCY Not sure of location 12 Not handy for me 10 Age /Physical condition of respondent 6 No time 5 Does not meet needs 4 No interest 4 Use trail in Deephaven-smaller rocks 2 Rides bike in basement 2 PAGE 4 5. Which is your family likely to use more often? ANSWER FREQUENCY % OF SAMPLE % RESPONDING Parks 57 40.7 46.7 Trails 65 46.4 53.3 N/A 18 12.9 --- TOTAL 140 100 100 . 6. Shorewood has five parks and a multi-use trail. Four of the parks are neighborhood parks; Badger Park, in the central part of the City; Cathcart Park, in the southwest portion of the City; Manor Park, to the northeast of the City; and Silverwood Park, to the southeast. Freeman Park is the City-wide park and is located near Highway 7 and Eureka Road. Proposed improvements to these Shorewood City parks include: open skating areas, improved children's play areas, picnic areas, tennis courts, additional parking areas, playing fields, nature trails and other improvements. How much per year would you be willing to pay in increased taxes for park improvments and trail expansion? ANSWER FRENQUENCY % OF SAMPLE % RESPONDING CUM % . Less than $10 56 40.0 42.4 42.4 $10 to $20 26 18.6 19.7 62.1 $20 to $30 10 7.1 7.6 69.7 $30 to $40 10 7.1 7.6 77.3 $40 to $50 12 8.6 9.1 86.4 Over $50 18 12.9 13.6 100.0 N/A 8 5.7 TOTAL 140 100.0 100.0 PAGE 5 7. Knowing the improvements would add about $30 in taxes per year to a home of $100,000 in value; or about $50 in taxes per year to a home of $200,000 in value; would you vote for or against the proposed improvements at these tax costs? ANSWER FREQUENCY 76 60 4 % OF SAMPLE 54.3 42.9 2.9 % RESPONDING 55.9 44.1 For Against N/A I TOTAL 140 100 100 8. . Would you tell me the major reason for your answer? NEGATIVE ANSWERS FREOUENCY . . . . . . . . . . . Stiff taxes/already too high/ keep rising/can't afford more 31 School referendum - must come first/can't afford more 12 Don't use much/don't use at all/wouldn't use 11 Economy bad/no jobs/laid off 8 Facilities are adequate 6 Not necessary/spend money on roads/health & welfare/safety 2 Senior Citizen 2 Try to be content with what we have 1 Parks in good shape now 1 I use Hennepin County Parks, pay enough that way 1 Parks aren't what he moved out here foroo.if he'd wanted fancy parks, he'd have moved to Edina 1 Everything is getting out of hand 1 Rather use money for basic infrastructure-water and sewer 1 Try to simply acquire land for now 1 Would not directly benefit him 1 Waste of money 1 Just too much-isn't worth it for $30 a year 1 Land would. be better used for development as a tax base 1 City pays too much for professional services now 1 Children are grown 1 Children almost gone 1 No children.oono need 1 Fixed income 1 Money wasted on equipment-should charge for rinks 1 Eden Prairie & Minnetonka/ other cities have parks that are closer 1 Don't use extensively 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PAGE 6 POSITIVE ANSWERS FREOUENCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Important part of the community 5 Have kids 4 fi~an~d 4 Really enjoy being able to go to parks 3 Use facilities a great deal 3 Parks need improvement 3 Kids benefit 3 Cost not much per year 3 We are outside all the time 2 Helps people have more reason to go to parks 2 There are lots of kids in the area, spend money on them 2 Would improve home value 2 Need to support parks 2 Feel should pay for community 2 Keep kids here locally 2 Parks are important for sense of neighborhood 1 Bought house because of proposed park improvements 1 Healthy for kids to have outdoor activities that don't cost money 1 We would use it 1 More activities 1 Lures us out of the house 1 Area needs better development in parks-quality and quantity 1 Important to have these facilities close to homes 1 Encourage family usage so parents can be involved as spectators 1 Safety is important 1 Excercise is important 1 Parks do a service 1 Strongly believe in parks/kids need to develop mentally and physically in a positive way 1 Children need parks 1 Would allow family activities together 1 Need to walk due to heart problem 1 The longer it's delayed, the harder it is to put in trails 1 Children and Grandchildren live around here 1 . Really in favor of City improvements 1 Green spaces are important 1 Got to have something in your own community for your own people- otherwise you're a blind community 1 Any park system is great for families, and this is a family area 1 The area is growing rapidly 1 Add value to the community 1 Kids used extensively when growing up 1 Family uses trail 1 Need to invest for the future 1 A community is only as good as its parks 1 Park improvement is good 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POSITIVE ANSWERS. Continued PAGE 7 . Children use parks 1 . Enjoy trails-would like to see them stay and improve 1 . Schools and parks would benefit 1 . Do a lot of hiking and biking activities 1 . Enhance neighborhood 1 . In favor of parks 1 . Parks and trails are wonderful 1 . Children and entire area uses Manor Park 1 . Need more park facilities to keep kids out of trouble 1 . Keep active 1 . Important to have quality parks for kids and family 1 . Raised family here 1 . Enjoyed facilities 1 . Need play equipment 1 . . My four kids and self all playa lot of baseball 1 . $50 to get something good is not a lot of money 1 . Parks good for community 1 . Whole family uses parks a lot 1 . Want clean and safe parks 1 . Grandchildren use parks 1 . Parks improve the community 1 . Would improve parks 1 . My kids-who use parks-will also have kids who use them 1 . Value of facilities for adults and older people 1 . Kids like parks 1 . Strong park system adds to resale 1 . Long term resident says parks are important for families 1 . Parks are safe - away- from traffic 1 . School shortage shows how many children there are to use parks 1 . . In favor of progressive community enhancement\inc1uding parks 1 GENERAL ANSWERS . Lack of information about parks . Budget priorities of City . Major issue . What is the benefit? . What is the budget? . Do improvements the right way . Parks are well kept . Intend to live here through retirement . Would like a trail on Enchanted Island . Would like more information on availability . Too new to have opinion . Water...schools...now this...concerned with issues . Might change in future PAGE 8 9. Additional trail mileage according to the proposal, would be gradually constructed throughout Shorewood so that people could safely walk or bike to the parks and other places in Shorewood. Would you be more or less likely to vote for the proposed Improvement Referendum if trail expansion were to be emphasized? Or doesn't it matter? Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement Down: Q1 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I v 21 65 Question 1 Count 44 YES Row % 67.7 32.3% 48.1 %0 Used Shorewood Col % 58.7% 35.0% Parks in past year Count 31 39 70 NO Row % 44.3% 55.7% 51.9% Col % 41.3% 65.0% COLUMN 75 60 135 TOTAL 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% PAGE 9 Ouest ion 7 with Ouestion 3 Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement Down: Q3 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I V Question 3 Count 42 24 66 YES Row % 63.6 36.4% 48.9%0 Used Shorewood Col % 55.3% 40.7% Trails in past year Count 34 35 69 . NO Row % 49.3% 50.7% 51.1 % Col % 44.7% 59.3% COLUMN 76 59 135 TOTAL 56.3% 43.7% 100.0% Ouest ion 7 with Ouestion 5 Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement . Down: Q5 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I Question 5 v Count 20 55 35 YES Row % 63.6 36.4% 45.8% Used Parks Col % 51.5% 38.5% or trails more Count 33 32 65 NO Row % 50.8% 49.2% 54.2% Col % 48.5% 61.5 % COLUMN 68 52 120 TOTAL 56.7% 43.3% 100.0% PAGE 10 Ouestion 7 with Ouestion 6 Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement Down: Q6 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I v . Question 6 Count 9 45 54 LESS THAN $10 Row % 16.7 83.3% 41.9% Additional Col % 12.0% 83.3% taxes willing to pay Count 17 8 25 $10 to $20 Row % 68.0% 32.0% 19.4% Col % 22.7% 14.8% Count 10 0 10 $20 to $30 Row % 100.% 0% 7.8% Col % 13.3% 0% Count 10 0 10 $30 to $40 Row % 100.% .0% 7.8% . Col % 13.3% .0% Count 12 .0 12 $40 to $50 Row % 100 .0% 9.3% Col % 16.0% .0% Count 17 1 18 OVER $50 Row % 94.4% 5.6% 19.4% Col % 22.7% 1.9% COLUMN 75 54 129 TOTAL 58.1% 41.9% 100.% PAGE 11 Question 7 with Ouestion 10 Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement Down: Q9 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I Question 10 v 54 Count 31 23 MORE LIKELY Row % 57.4 42.6% 39.7% More or less Col % 40.8% 38.3% likely to support in Count 0 6 6 1993 with LESS LIKELY Row % .0% 100.0% 4.4% . improved Col % .0% 10.0% economy Count 45 31 76 DOESN'T Row% 59.2% 40.8% 55.9% MATTER Col% 592% 51.7% COLUMN 76 60 136 TOTAL 55.9% 44.1% 100.0% Ouestion 10 with Question 7 Across: Question 7 - Would vote for or against improvement . Down: Q10 Q7-> FOR AGAINST ROW TOTAL I V Question 10 Count 45 25 70 MORE LIKELY Row % 64.3 35.7% 52.2% More or less Col % 60.8% 41.7% likely to vote for Count 5 11 16 referendum LESS LIKELY Row % 31.3% 68.8% 19.4% Col % 6.8% 18.3% Count 24 24 48 DOESN'T Row% 50.0% 50% 35.8% MATTER Col% 32.4% 40.0% COLUMN 74 60 134 TOTAL 55.2% 44.8% 100.0% JCH:sn 3/5/92 C:\SURVEY APPENDIX A Caller Name Name Address Phone Number Date CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK REFERENDUM QUESTIONNAIRE January, 1992 Hello. My name is I am calling on behalf of the City of Shorewood Park Commission. Weare doing a city-wide survey to determine the level of interest in improving Shorewood's parks and trails. . I would like to ask you a few short questions which will help us make appropriate plans for the future. Is this a convenient time for you to talk? (If not arrange to recall). Are you a registered voter in the City of Shorewood? Are you responsible for the paying of property taxes? (if yes to both continue, if no to one ask: Is there anybody at home who is a registered voter and responsible for paying property taxes I could talk with?) If not, thank them, and hang up. 1. During the past year have you or your family used any of Shorewood's parks? 1) _ Yes 2) _ No 2. If the answer.is No - ask Why? (DO NOT READ THE ANSWERS) (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) a) _ Age, Physical Condition b) _ Poor Facilities c) _ Don't Meet My Needs d) _ Other . 3. During the past year have you or your family used any of Shorewood's trails? 1) _ Yes - (SKIP TO QUESTION 5) 2) _ No 4. If the answer is No - ask Why? (DO NOT READ THE ANSWERS) (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) a) _ My Age/Physical Condition b) _ Not Handy for Me c) _ Other 5. \Vhich are you or your family more likely to use more often: (CHECK ONLY ONE) 1) _ Parks 2) _ Trails 6. Shorewood has five parks and a multi-use trail. Four of the parks are neighborhood parks: Badger Park, in the central part of the City; Cathcart Park, in the southwest portion of the City; Manor Park, to the northeast of the City; and, Silverwood Park, to the southeast. Freeman Park is the City-wide park and is located near Highway 7 and Eureka Road. Proposed improvements to these Shorewood City parks include: open skating areas, improved children's play areas, picnic areas, tennis courts, additional parking areas, playing fields, nature trails and other improvements. How much per year would you be willing to pay in increased taxes for park improvements and trail expansion? 1) _ Less than $10; 4) _ $30 to $40; . 2) _ $10 to $20; 5) _ $40 to $50; 3) _ $20 to $30; 6) _ over $5G! 7. Knowing the improvements would add about $30 in taxes per year to a home of $100,000 in value; or about $50 in taxes per year to a home of $200,000 in value; would you vote for or against the proposed improvements at these tax costs? 1) _ For 2) '_ Against e. 8. Would you tell me the major reason for your answer? (PLEASE ENCOURAGE AS DETAILED A RESPONSE AS POSSIBLE) 9. Additional trail mileage according to the proposal, would be gradually constructed throughout Shorewood so that people could safely walk or bike to the parks and other places in Shorewood. Would you be more or less likely to vote for the proposed Improvement Referendum if trail expansion were to be emphasized? Or doesn't it matter? . 1) _ More Likely 2) _ Less Likely 3) _ Doesn't Matter 10. Would you be more or less likely to vote for these improvements in 1993 if the economy were to be improved, or doesn't it matter? 1)_ More Likely 2)_ Less Likely 3)_ Doesn't Matter Thank you for your comments. They will be very useful to us. Are there any other registered voters I can talk with? (If so use a separate questionnaire) May I verify your name, address and phone number? (place on top right, front side) aljpkrefer.dum I I r.a >< - c z w c.. c.. <( 5 . . .. . , " " . . . I ' ..,\ Ul E-i H ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ H UQ ~ Q~ 88 ~8 ~~ i I' 1-: --.,--,-----.---..... -.----.... ..0.0 ....... . I '. I ;,1 ,I ,- . !:,\ " . i, : I,,' /' , , ....:;.:..=.: . .; , € t L , I: i: L n , I CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daughertv Daniel Lewis 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission,. Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 16 February 1992 - '<,'" RE: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment - L- R District Lakeshore Setback FILE NO. 405.. (Zoning) , In 1985 the 'City established a. 75...fooUakeshoresetback -reG.uirCfiJ.ent for Lake Minnetonka, in order to be consistent with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The MCWD later revised its requirement to 50 feet, consistent with State shoreland management regulations, '.v hen it realized that Shorewood was entirely served by city sewer. Subsequently, in 1986, the City revised its requirement back to the 50-foot requirement which had existed for years. . A recent inquiry by the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club brought to the attention of this office that the lake shore setback for the L-R, Lakeshore Recreational District was never shanged from 75 feet to 50 feet when the setback was changed for other zoning districts. While this has an adverse effect on the Yacht Club's ability to conform to the Code, the staff believes it was an oversight that should be corrected by the City. Consequently it is __ suggested that the Code be. amended at the City's own initiative. Following are the three sites which are potentially affect~d by the L-R District requirements and their current zoning status: 1) Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club: R~lC, Sing1e:-Family Residential 2) Howard's Point Marina: R-1A, Single-Family Residential 3) Shorcwood Yacht Club: R-1A, Single-Family Residential It should be noted that none of these facilities has applied for L-R District zoning. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 6/J ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The City spent a considerable amount of time in the 1970's trying to develop an ordinance which provides for access to Lake. Minnetonka, while at the same time protects residential properties adjoining the access sites. This effort culminated in the provisions of the Lakeshore Recreational District found in Section 1201.24 of the City Code. Although.not specifically stated, the Code limits lakeshore recreational use to the three sites- which currently exist. Additional sites are precluded by the requirement that no site can be located within 5000 feet of an existing multiple dock facility. . Bringing these sites into conformity with the L-R District requirements can benifit both the City as well as the facilities themselves. As conforming uses under the L-R District the facilities could make changes which are not currently allowed for nonconforming uses in residential districts. As an example, Howard's Point Marina could update and even enlarge its' underground fuel tanks and provide pump-out service for its' customers. The City' benefits by the licensing and annual review of licenses, parking requirement compliance, landscaping and screening requirements, etc. The L-R District already requires a 50-foot side yard setback adjoining residential uses, 30 feet more than other uses must provide. Requiring an additional 25 feet more of lakeshore setback than other uses must provide makes it less and less practical for owners of the existing sites to apply for L-R zoning. It should be remembered that the 75-foot setback is associated with on-site septic systems. Also, requiring buildings to be located 75 feet from the lake invariably forces parking on the lake side of the site (parking is allowed to be 50 feet from the lake). This seems contrary to Shorewood's past practice of protecting the lake. . Had the City not intended for these facilities to continue in existence, it could have left them as nonconforming uses in their respective residential zoning districts. In view of the purpose of the L-R District, it is recommended that the City amend the Code to require a 50-foot setback in the L- R District. cc: Jim Hurm Dave Sellergren Skip Jewett Bob Hegstrom Bob Rascop -2- 0- wiD (j) 5w w~ 0:0 /'.'''1. "'-\-( I \:) : ~~. I r;~~( /' \1011, I I ...... )... ~ ~ fa ~ '- I. ......: 0 "'I- ~ ~ g:Z ~ <0 ~W . ,-- C\/ iX::2: <(I- 0 iia: 0 ~~ 0 C\/ W 0 o o $2 b o ~ o o :>:0 10:5: oW ~a: ~O w:I: :fen o I I .. '''I~- ~ <:::( --J ~ ~ '- '~o l~ '2j ~ "t ~ I I I I I -I ,~ .. .:JJ/,...o I .- --'- ",.")- '-" -"g-, ....... ~-- ~ -'.u,' ~ .'" - -0 ~i I \. L~" t :;)7"'-: ":t I I I , I ./' ,\i /\1 =! ~ c: .C ~ ~ )... ~ ~ ~ q: E.,,"~ bit A . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1201 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1: Section 1201.24, Subd. 3.d.(2) of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "(2) Rear yard Not less than 50 feet (from the ordinary high water mark)" Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this _ day of , 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator/Clerk }' MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD ~. SHOREWOOD,MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 . MEMORANDUM . TO: Mayor and City Council -FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 3 March 1992 RE: Doherty - Division/Combination and Partial Street Vacation FILE NO. 405 (92.05) DLle to--'scheduling of precinct caucuses. on 3 March the Planning Commission.:willnotn~view the division/combination part of this request until 17 March. It is therefore recommended that tbe Council conduct the public hearing as scheduled on 9 March, but not take any action until the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. Both the vacation a.'1d the division/combination will then be scheduled for Council review oni 13 April, at which iimeproposed resolutions for both requests will be presented. . If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do net hesitate to contact me prior. to ~~q.' - cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel . Dave Sellergren Joe Zwak Thomas Doherty A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~A . '. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kri sti Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 /-' MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Counc~il . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 3 March 1992 RE: Doherty, - Thomas - Simple Subdivision/Combination and Proposed Partial Street Vacation - Gardendale Road _ - FILE NO. 405 (92.05) BACKGROUND . Mr. Thomas Doherty owns the property located at 20375 Manor Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), which abuts the east side of Gardendale Road, a platted, but undeveloped street right-of-way. Gardendale Road separates his homestead parcel from a triangular shaped parcel on the west side of the r.o. w. , -upon which his driveway is located. Mr. Doherty requests that the City of Shorewood vacate a portion of Gardendale Road adjoining his home. ''"''., Gardendale Road serves as the only access to an approximately three acre site south of Doherty's. The owner, JamesBeal, was granted a permit almost two years ago to clear an access path to his property. That approval specified that construction of a driveway would ~ require an additional r.o.w. permit at such time as someone applies for a building permit for the Beal property. Review of that request revealed that the right-of-way comes extremely close to Mr. Doherty's house. In fact a recent survey by Mr. Doherty (see Exhibit B, attached) indicates that his house actually encroaches onto the right-of-way. Mr. Doherty's survey shows the portion of the road he would like vacated. At staff's direction he has also shown a portion of his westerly parcel which he proposes to trade back to the City so that the Beal property will still have access. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Doherty Division/Combination and Street Vacation 3 March 1992 Page two ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION While the proposed r .0. w. trade obviously benefits the applicant, it also improves the intersection of Gardendale Road with Manor Road by making its angle closer to ninety degrees. This is particularly important given the proximity of the intersection to Knightsbridge Road just west of Gardendale. There is some question as to how much r.o.w. should be vacated. Although the parcel the . applicant proposes to convey to the City is the same width as that being vacated, the resulting r.o.w. tapers down to approximately 19 feet in front of his garage. It is recommended that the line be moved closer to the applicant's garage so that the r.o.w. is not reduced to less than 25 feet in width. / . It is recommended that the City approve the subdivision/combination and partial street .vacation subject to the following: 1. The applicant must submit a revised legal description of the r.o.w. to be vacated, showing the r.o.w. no less than 25 feet in width. 2. The applicant must provide an up-to-date (within 30 days)' title opinion for the property to be conveyed to the City. 3. The vacation and division/combination must be recorded within 60 days of the Council's approval of the request. (Note: The Subdivision Ordirtance requires that division be recorded within 30 days. However, we are aware that there are title questions on the triangular parcel which may take additional time to clear.) . 4. Prior to release of the resolution approving the applicant's request, the applicant must submit an executed application for a right-of-way permit (see Exhibit C, attached). cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Dave Sellergren Joe Zwak Thomas Doherty -2- ~:_--------------~ ,,~ \ 9ge03.. : , ' \ :I,.... . ! '.~. . "jr. :J,. \ (25) \ ~! "" \ ./ , '-, (6) \ , , , ltlL'I.J4 Kt::l ~ (t ~ OI.B ..... (62) ..., 51 ( 29) I __ 48.93 105 ( 28) ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ of/.: 01. A ~(20) !:- J... . .- J'. . ,- c ~ .;;'-, -.~~ ~: ~ ..... :1- . J; / r;~-. 53 ( 15) (3) .- '.-. ~..-~ 10 R ..... 1"35. 9 ...~ 220 . Nof\h J ,. (0 .UJD~ --. -, ....-. z--- ,., ... ~ f ("q") .....f&~1. ....r-Orrt y :R PART OF LOT 49 ( 10) 140.86 ISO 299. 06 ISO in on -103:45- ~,~ . .~ ~<!t> ~ ~. ~/.~ o. 'J' \5"R <" ": 241.5 .' 220 1 on '=! PART OF LOT 49 (7) 69 (33) , , , , , , , . , , " " 45 ' , ~' , ~-' , , -/ .~~ , . '- , - ~'.. , , " , , ., " , - L,- '-. (4) :\ , , , ", '; ." .............., ---'_. 44 -" ---- N6 :.( C' -.-'j'~6' . :- ~.'- ! --..OJ:! ': /..i ,- ( 5) ;' " '00. ,,_----iif----J. ,0 ,&:il. //,',0'7" 70 a;. ( 19) ~:'. '$:". ~S..... I : (30 I I I I I I I I I . I ~ 51 ;~--;,t ~ r~''''' .-:1 ". ( 28) . , I '20 R t26:( LOT 48 ~"::'. / <" "- ( I) ~ .~ ~, ,-, ...... Y 'J .' ,', vi '" .... /--" if' J_ .... J ,01 ,~~. .t:.. '--' ,''l:.( t " ". IJ) " ~t't.,o~ r"'~1... \J~~-\f.J to bL. VA.(..A.t..J . ~ ~. ~O 'b. ~"t> ~ 1'\/7' ~l' ~o.( / ~r;y I I I _..l._ I ,}, ... ... _ ,"_.,I . ,". (......~ -1- ../ ,,-, Port it>~ to bt.. _.~_:'7' , :-1!~~~s~ Co~~~tK -to ,,::.. t \ ~e.'" Y".O.~.) ... ru ... '0 ~ 00)' ,'>- 24-. Z N ('l . , ~\-\l,.t "I rt~ ~~.t\~ I VI uJ (fJ C\t1 '2:r :1 ~ ~ -0 j ~ ~ This survey shows the location of an existin~ house in relation to the boundaries of Garden- dale Road adjacent to Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor Second Addition. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. . Nor~ I It I =!O -0 -., ..;:: o - '21 -r-N o -1)- o c...~ o " -S \} ~ .; 0- Y -- ! -f" 0 "'- ~ 'lJ u.J X s: \-\ov,>e. . ~ ( ~ 30 'vJ o o IN o o t j !-=- , I I \ (:,. '2. z ~ Leqal Description of additional Dohertv rarc~l: That part of Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor S8cond Addition, lying Northeasterly of (1 line drawn ~\\, b-,t ~ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO KEEP OR MAINTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLICLY OWNED HIGHT-OF-WAY PUHSUANT '1'0 SliOREWOOD OHDINAUCE NO. 121 Please type or print legibly 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Please give the name(s) of all persons who own the private property to be maintained in right-of-way. NAME(S) ADDRESSES TELEPHONE . RIGHT-OF-WAY Please name the highway, road, street, alley or other right-of-way upon which you are requesting to maintain private property. 3. Please describe as carefully as possible the exact location or address on the right-of-way where the private property is to be maintained, as well as the nature, extent and purpose of the requested encroachment on the right-of-way. (Attach a photograph or sketch if possible). . In consideration of approval of this permit, I h(;reby knowingly and voluntarily waive any right to recover frem the City of 3horewood for damag~ occurring to property in the right-of-way as abovl; described, which d~mag(' results from the performance by the City of Shorewood or its agE::uts (,f any public duti,;;.; r'I,:;luiced ty la'll. futt..: Applicant signature(s) Per'rni t ( ) Approved ( ) Not Approved ~I\, \,~ ~ c, Lute RESOLUTION NO. -92 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR YEAR XVIII OF THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood, through execution of a Joint Coorperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and . WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, and held a public hearing on March 9th, 1992 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's proposed use of $22,779.00 from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin county Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shorewood approves the following projects for funding from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program related and applicable program income and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. proiect Budqet . Municipal Building Renovations Required by the American Disabilities Act $16,297.00 Southshore Senior Center Operation $ 6,482.00 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL by the City of Shorewood this 9th day of March , 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator CDBG.92 1 T I City of Shorewood (Official Publication) ..... CITY OF SHOREWooD NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING YEAR XVIII (1992) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the city of Shorewood in cooperation with Hennepin County, pursuant to nUe I of the Housing and Community Development Ad of 1974, as amended. is holding a public hearing on March 9,1992. at 7:30 p,m. in the Council Chambers of Shorewood City Hall. The public hearing is on housing and community development needs of the city and UrbaIi Hen- - nepin County, the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program State-: ment of Objectives and the propa;ed use of the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program planning allocation of $22,779 by the city. - During the July 1. 1992 to JW1e 30, 1993 program year it is estimated that no additional program. . income from locally funded CDBG activities will be available to the city. . The Statement of Objectives basically consists of the following seven program areas: (l) AD- MINISTRATION, to maximize program benefiland effectively administer program funds; (2) _ HOUSING, to rehabilitate and assist in the development of housing which is affordable to low. and moderate-income households; (3) NEIGHBORHOOD REV1TAUZATION, to maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods through concentrated community development activities; (4) PUBUC FACIUTIES. to improve existing and assist in the development of new public facilities _ which benefit low-and moderate-income persons; (5) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, to provide fmancia1 assistance to businesses which will provide or retain employment to the benefit of low- and moderate-income persons; (6) PUBUC SERVICES, to expand and improve the quantity and quality of public services available to low- and moderate-income persons; and (7) REMOVAL OF ARCHITEcroRAL BARRIERS. to alleviate cooditioos which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly or handicapped persons. The city of shorewOOd is proposing to undertake the following activities with Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting about July-I. 1992- Activity Municipal Building Renovations Required by the American Disabilities Act $16,297.00 Southshore Senior Center Operation $ 6,482.00 For additional information on the proposed activities. level of funding, program objectives and performance. coatad the city of Sborewood at 474-3236 or the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Deve~ment at ~18. . The public hearing is being held pursuant of MS 471.59. CITY OF SHOREWOOD JAMES C. HURM City Administrator . Budget (Feb. 26, 1992)-EXC/SHWD . t!-~;~/ :-~~ ,...., --,-'~- ~ ,..) ~r~""""<"", SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1600 South 2nd Street, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 February 21, 1992 BOARD of DIRECTORS Walter Levesque President Tom Ticen 1 st Vice President Bob Miller 2nd Vice President .a Stokes etary Carla Pavone Treasurer John Blaser Past President Daralyn Peifer Member-at-Large Ryan Schroeder Member-at-Large Toni Anderson Karl Dansky Robert DeGhetto .on Fuhr y Guritz Commissioner Tad Jude Leonard Kopp Connie McCullough John Nelson Senator Gen Olson Steve Rood Russell Weinstein Bob Zagaros Benjamim F. Withhart Executive Director & C.E.D. . A United Way Supported Agency 933-9311 Fax 933-2101 Mayor Barbara Brancel CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN. 55331 Dear Mayor Brancel: This letter is meant as a follow-up to our conversation about the possible increase in support by the City of Shorewood for the Southshore Senior Center. The City of Chanhassen has embarked on the development of a new Senior Center located in the lower level of its Municipal building. As a regular funder of the Southshore Senior Center in the past, Chanhassen has recently indicated that we should anticipate a significant decrease in Southshore Center support in the next Community Development Block Grant (CDBG Year XVIII) fiscal year. In a letter dated February 11th, I wrote to you requesting $ 6,482 for the 1992-93 fiscal year from the City of Shorewood to support the Southshore Senior Center. I would like you to consider increasing that level by $2-3,000. This would significantly lesson the impact of the expected cut and should go a long way towards maintaining the Center's viability. Underlying all programs operated by Senior Community Services is the desire to help people maintain their independence. The South shore Senior Center, with its dining and transportation services, educational programs, and as a place to meet with friends, plays a direct role in assisting the Center's participants to maintain their independence remaining in their respective communities for as long as possible. Sincerely, 1(' C1-o ~ ;~~V, o-,?~nn Kvern Cen ter Director cc: James Hurn, City Clerk/ Administrator cr=R I 2 1992 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1600 South 2nd Street, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 BOARD of DIRECTORS Walter Levesque President Tom Ticen 1st Vice President Bob Miller 2nd Vice President Linda Stokes Secretary Carla Pavone Treasurer John Blaser Past President Daralyn Peifer Member-at-Large Ryan Schroeder Member-at-Large Toni Anderson Karl Dansky Robert DeGhetto Alison Fuhr Marty Guritz Commissioner Tad Jude Leonard Kopp Connie McCullough John Nelson Senator Gen Olson Steve Rood Russell Weinstein Bob Zagaros Benjamim F. Withhart Executive Director & C.E. O. . A United Way Supported Agency 933-9311 Fax 933-2101 February 11,1992 Mayor Barbara Brancel and City Council Members CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN. 55331 Dear Mayor Brancel and Council Members: . Senior Community Services is requesting $ 6,482 for the 1992-93 fiscal year from the City of Shorewood to support the Southshore Senior Center. This amount reflects a 4% cost-of- living-increase. The City provided $ 6,233 for the past year through its share of County-wide Community Development Block Grant (CDBG Year XVII) funds. Shorewood, along with the other cities that support the Southshore Senior Center, provides a very valuable service to its elderly residents. Dining, transportation and the meeting with friends, helps maintain the independence of the Center's participants in their respective communities for as long as possible. . On behalf of the seniors, who are the real beneficiaries of your funds, many thanks for your on-going support. If you have any questions, or if the City Council would like to have an informational presentation, please let me know. Si~=9t~ 6iamin F. Withhart Executive Director ~~~ Cen ter Director . . HENNEPIN DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAR 2 . \992. February 27, 1992 Urban Hennepin County Cooperating Communities Hennepin County ~ Office of Planning and Development REVISED 1992 CDBG PLANNING ALLOCATIONS HUD has reduced the 1992 (Year XIII) CDBG allocation to Urban Hennepin County by $52,000. The accompanying schedule represents this reduction and the resulting planning allocation for each community. Please use these amounts in finalizing your 1992 request for funding. HUD explained the reduction as a result of the 1990 Census showing no population in the Hennepin County portion of Chanhassen, therefore, eliminat- ing Chanhassen's statistics from HUD's allocation formula. HUD's decision is being questioned, although HUD has assured us the allocation for 1992 will not be changed. RI:tf Enclosure PLANNING ALLOCATIONS YEAR XVIII (1992) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REVISED 2/27/92 Community Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Chanhassen Corcoran Crystal Dayton Deephaven Eden Prairie Edina Excelsior Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover Hassan Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford Rogers Shorewood Spring Park st. Anthony st. Bonifacius st. Louis Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland Total Hennepin County Total Allocation LATEST YEAR XVIII ALLOCATION 217,491 336,678 42,819 40,744 35,521 127,065 27,645 17,039 88,731 150,913 15,186 75,101 8,579 3,435 6,013 13,324 106,014 16,503 7,130 1,870 106,917 8,045 1,579 15,238 141,282 940 21,784 70,588 123,127 25,736 20,364 187,099 71,292 21,126 7,491 22,358 10,652 28,044 8,033 230,925 5,664 18,669 3,745 . . 2,488,500 276,500 2,765,000 A Eos ;\RCHITECTURE . . 21 \\\TER STREET E\CELSIOl\. \11\\ESOn ))3)1 [\,\ 612-~~-Hl)2S 612-~-+)2l)1 M'R 4 1992 March 4, 1992 Ms. Barb Bra ncel , Mayor City Council Members City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 RE: Public Works Facility Eos #91129 Dear Mayor Brancel and Council Members: Enclosed is a copy of our revised construction cost estimate for the Shorewood Public Works Facility. We have worked closely with Shorewood staff and Joel Dresel of OSM in considering overall site, building and cost issues. Project Architect Gordy Metcalf and I will be attending the March 9th council meeting to discuss the project and answer any questions you may have. Thank you again for the opportunity to work with the City of Shorewood. Very truly yours, &~utJr70U\L J. Nicholas Ruehl, AlA President Enclosure: Statement of Probable Construction Costs. [QUI. OPPORn\IT': E\lPI.O\ g A Eos ;\RCHITECTURE STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS (This cost estimate is based on several factors including budget figures from certain possible suppliers, the apparent "bidding market", direct cost data from the "MEANS" construction cost handbook, 1991 edition. and lump sum and/or "square footage" estimates from the Civil, Mechanical and Electrical design professionals who form, along with Eos, the design team for this Project. In certain instances, the indicated costs are based on work to be accomplished in the future (late summer-early fall). This estimate may not be considered to be a guarantee that the actual project cost will not exceed the probable costs indicated.) ITEM QUANlTIY UNIT COST TOTAL . Excavation 925 c.y... 3.25 3,006.00 Footings 1000 I.f. 17.30 17,300.00 Slab 5" ave. 17398 sJ 2.45 42625.00 Wall panels 15192 sJ. 9.21 139918.00 Precast plank 1144 sJ. 3.80 4,347.00 Garage doors 6 2800.00 16,800.00 Roof blocking 700 I.f. 2.50 1,750.00 Roof memb. 17398 sJ. 0.85 14,788.00 Fascia 700 I.f. 6.00 4,200.00 Roof insul. 17398 sJ. 1.80 31,316.00 Steel deck 17398 sJ 1.10 19,137.00 Steel beam 500 l.f. 18.14 9,070.00 Alum windows 496 sJ. 29.00 14,384.00 Metal doors 14 180.00 2,520.00 Wood doors 8 124.00 992.00 . Metal frames 22 77.00 1,694.00 Trench drains 134 l.f. 55.00 7,370.00 Conc. Blk 2345 sJ. 5.04 11,818.00 Glazed Blk 1050 sJ. 11. 40 11,970.00 Gyp. Bd. 1200 sJ. 2.10 2,520.00 Cern Plast. 5 s.y. 52.00 260.00 Cer/Quarry T. 1840 sJ. 6.10 11,224.00 Act. Ceiling 1750 sJ. 1.80 3,150.00 Resil Base 200 I.f. 1.10 220.00 Counter/vanity 18 l.f. 150.00 2,700.00 Paint 2000 sJ. 0.50 1,000.00 Lockers 24 92.00 2,208.00 Floor mat 1 300.00. 300.00 Fire exting's 4 150.00 600.00 Miscellaneous Lump sum 10000.00 10,000.00 A Eos ARCHITECTURE . . STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUcnON COSTS Cont TOTAL GENERAL CONSTRUCI10N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL MECHANICAL CONSTRUCI10N (lump sum). . . . TOTAL ELECfRICAL CONSTRUCI10N (lump sum). . . . . sub-total general conditions @ 10% sub-total profit & overhead @ 10% TOTAL ESTIMATE OF COSTS FOR THE BUIlDING; (costs per square foot: $737732/17398 sJ.= $42 40.) ADDmONAL ITEMS FOR BUDGET CONSIDERATION; Salt Storage Building Salt Storage Building Grading *( under contract) NE fees Contingency Supp. Agreemn't for add'n site work Soils testing Furniture & Equipment Legal sub-total additional items TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECf COST AVAILABLE FUNDS ADDmONAL FUNDS NEEDED 379,187.00 153,880.00 76,630.00 609,697.00 60,969.00 670,666.00 67,066.00 $ 737,732.00 45,000.00* 85,000.00* 65,000.00 37,000.00 150,000.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 $395,000.00 $1,132,732.00 $1,106,712.00 $26,020.00 RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY WHEREAS, on December 9, 1991, the city council authorized EOS Architecture to prepare plans and specifications for the Public Works facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That such plans and specifications, dated March 13, 1992 are hereby approved. . 2. That the ci ty Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and in "Construction Bulletin" an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 11:00 a.m., on April 8, 1992, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7: 00 p. m. on April 13, 1992, in the Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five per cent (5%) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 9th day ~ of March, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 Enclosed is a proposed Spring Newsletter article which recommends Saturday, May 9th for the 1992 Spring Clean Up. It is very similar to last years curbside Spring Clean Up and drop-off at the City garage. Final billing would be prorated among the Shorewood residents and payment due on the second quarter utility billing. Also enclosed is a Letter of Agreement with Wood lake Sanitary Service, Inc., a subsidiary of BFI Waste System. Please review the article and agreement carefully. Should you have any changes or concerns please call me prior to the meeting on Monday evening. . Thank you. JCH.al enclosure A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Cf Article for Spring Newsletter SPRING CLEANUP Its getting to be that time of year! This year our Spring Cleanup will be handled similarly to last years. a combination of curbside pickup for yard waste, brush and household rubbish, and a limited drop-off site for certain larger items. Curbside Pickup. The curbside effort will be conducted on Saturday, May 9. you wish to have taken away must be at the street bv 8:00 Saturdav. The cost of this service will be prorated residents of Shorewood and will appear on your second utility bill. Items a.m. on to all quarter . Following is a list of the types of items which will be accepted for the curbside pickup: Brush, cut in four-foot lengths and bundled so as to be handled by one person Grass clippings and leaves in bags General household rubbish including small furniture items Construction debris (lumber, blocks, sheetrock, etc) will not be acceDted. To expedite the process, please have brush and yard waste in piles separated from the trash. . Limited DroD-off site. On Saturday, May 9, residents may bring larger items to the Public Works garage located at 5755 Country Club Road, between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm. Following is a list of items which will be accepted and the fees which will be charged for those items: Applicances Mattresses, carpet and large furniture items (per piece) Automobile tires (without rims) Automobile rims Truck tires (no rims) Batteries $ 6.00 $17.00 $ 3.00 $ 6.00 $12.00 no fee . . Both the curbside pickup and the drop-off site are for Shorewood residents only. Those using the drop-off site will be required to show proof that they are Shorewood residents. Larqe Volumes of Brush and Yard Waste, and Trees Since the curbside pickup is limited to bagged yard waste and manageable bundles of .brush, it may not be practical for some residents with large volumes of brush, logs, etc. to utilize the cudrbside service. Those residents have three apparent options: 1. Contact a private company, listed in the Yellow Pages under Tree Service, which chips trees and brush. (Bagged woodchips can be accepted in the curbside cleanup). 2. Take large loads (no compost materials) to the Hennepin County Tree Disposal Site in Maple Grove, operated by Ceres Tree Co. The site is open weekdays 8: 00 am to 4: 00 pm and Saturdays 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. Call 420-7045 for fees and directions to the site. 3. Make arrangements with a private company to have a dumpster brough to your property. Yard waste collected in the Spring Clean up will go to R & W Roll-Off Service Inc. (448-7833), who can also provide dumpsters. JCH.al 3/3/92 Recycled paper WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. @ A Subsidiary of ~ =.,. BROWNlNG-FEIlRIS INIlUSTRlES March 4, 1992 Jim Hurm City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: Spring Cleanup - Shorewood Dear Mr. Hurm: . Thank you for the opportunity to do the Spring Cleanup collection for the City of Shorewood. We appreciated doing the service for you last year. We anticipate that there may be more yardwaste than last year because of the early snow storm ( on Halloween ) and an earlier cleanup date this year than last ( May 9th instead of June 1st ). Our charge would be $60.00 per hour again this year for each truck we use. All disposal costs ( tipping fees ) will be charged back to the city of Shorewood. Tipping fees have not been increased since last year but we plan to not spend the extra time "debagging" the grass and leaves at the curb this year. It is considerably faster to throw the bags directly into the truck and have the compost site do the debagging process. The tipping fee for bagged yardwaste is $7.50 per yard, however, compared to $4.00 when it was debagged and mixed with the brush. We expect the savings in time will offset the increase in disposal. A special extra charge of $15.00 will be charged at the disposal site for hide- . abeds. Also, rolls of carpet that exceed six (6) feet in length and 12 inches in diameter will cost an extra $15.00, so you might want to advise residents about how to prepare their rolls of carpet before they bring them to the drop-off center. They also should not tie the rolls of carpet with wire. Last year we did not haul away the tires, batteries and large appliances that were taken to the drop-off site but we certainly can do it for you if you want. We can see how many of these items are brought in and take care of it on Monday if necessary. We plan to start our curbside collection of trash and yardwaste at 8:00 A.M. on Saturday, May 9th. We understand the curbside collection to be limited to the following items: 1.) Household rubbish to include small furniture items. 2.) Grass and leaves in bags. 3.) Brush cut in four (4) foot lengths and bundled so one man can easily handle it. Hazardous waste and construction debris will not be collected. 9813 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55347 · (612) 941-5174. FAX: (612) 941-0266 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . . Please call me if you have any questions. I will contact you later in March if I do not hear from you. Sincerely, 04/ //~~~ Bill Heaston Assistant District Manager OWHI dmj January, 1992 SHOREWOOD CITY VALUES The Shorewood City Council, in its governing roll, is responsible for setting policies for the City, which are implemented by the Administrator and city employees. Furthermore, the Administrator, employees, and City commissions propose overall goals, ~pecific objectives, service levels, and action plans for council consideration and direction. This "team" makes decisions and acts based on a strong set of values. The team values are: . . A strong sense of commitment to the City and its statement of Purpose. . Open, democratic government, enhanced by an informed populace. . Responsiveness to the needs and desires of the citizens; public service. . Fair and equal interpretation and enforcement of City Codes. . A reputation for dependability and integrity. . Teamwork and action oriented problem solving (acting rather than reacting) . . striving for improved productivity and efficiency through new technology and innovation. . . Employee selection by merit. . Professional development. . Respect for City employees who, with fair treatment, proper training, and a willingness to let them excel, will take pride in association with the City and serve the people well. . The provision of accurate, timely information to the City Council, thru proper channels, so the best possible decisions . can be made. . Adherence to professional, ethical standards of conduct. JCH.al f 1--4ft 8)TERLING CODIfIEQ~. INC. (800) 338-7458 (208) 549-2830 FAX: (208) 549-1515 35 West Commercial, P.O. Box 711, Weiser, ID 83672 February 21. 1992 Anne P. Latter, Deputy Clerk CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood. MN 55331 Dear Anne: FES 2 4 1992 To reiterate our telephone con~ersation of this date, after analyzing Ordinance 250 as to amount of work involved to amend the City Code. the cost could be in the neighborhood of $1.000 to $1.500~ We would -add Title 1300. Fees. ash'1ecrd1..'la..""lce 'indicates. and-ciao change wording or add a footnote at every section in the text of the Code' where a fee is mentioned and said fee appears in Title 1300. . In checking the Index under "Fees. Rates. Charges and Deposits". I noticed the following sections of the Code which are not specifically mentioned in Ordinance 250: . 108.07.4 307.07 506.04.1c 506.06.3d 702.07 903.03.3 903.07.1 903.08.4 904.08.3c 904.18 1002.08.2 1003.02 1201.24.6d. .7b(2) 1201.25.6c(4)(b) 1202.19 Industrial Revenue Bond Closing Fee Going Out of Business Sale Application Individual Water Supply System Permit Well Driller's License Horse Confinement Costs Water Connection Permit Water Rates and Charges Water Meter Tests Joint Sewer Easements. Examination Sewer System Assessment Charges Building Movers. License Excavation or Storage of Rock. Sand or Gravel; Permit Rezoning to Lakeshore Recreational District Zoning, PUD Application Subdivisions. General Fee Wt;; will not proceed with supplementation of -the City Code ..mth we- .L'ecc;ive the CtuUiUunal' ordinances you mentioned. and until you let us know your decision regarding Ordinance 250. Thank you. Yours truly. STERLING CODIFIERS. INC. f1~ ~J,~ Jackie Campbell Managing Editor The mark of quality and service in ordinance codification 11-48 . . .,...:1. 2.... NORWEST BANKS ..... ....... Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. Excelsior Office 411 Water Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 612/474-5900 fE8 2. A \992 February 21, 1992 Mayor Barbara Brancel City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Subject: Annual Easy Race Dear Barbara: Our annual half-marathon between Wayzata and Excelsior is scheduled for Sunday, May 3, 1992. We again expect approximately 600 runners. As in past years, we will start in Wayzata at 9:00 A.M. and use the same route as before. Once again, we will be contributing race proceeds to area civic organizations. Please send me any permit applications your ordinances may require. I will complete and return immediately upon receipt. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 470-2306. Sincerely, Y/tt+4/, .1Il/!iItd,&1J MerryU'Whittaker Vice President 1c2. 4 MAR 04 '92 15: 39 THE BAI'IK EXCELSIOR P.2/2 L. "Lake St~ to Water St. Easy Race~" Sponsored by Norwest Bank OffiC~ in Wayzata and Excelsior To benefit Lake Minnetonka community organizations Start-Nowest Bank-Wayzati) 900 E. WayZata Boulev<m.l, Wayzata Finish-Norwest Bank-Excelsior Lake Street to Femdale Road to CountY Rd. 15 to Orono Orchitrd Road toF'ox Street to Old Crvstcl Bay Road to County &L 5t to County Rd. 19 to Northview Rd. to Lake Street to Old I1>..ach Road to t.OltIlly Rd. 19 to George Street to Water Street. $15.00 piJyoble to '"Easy Raca Xl". Mail with foon below to: Loretta Docken. Norw@_,d Balik Minnesota. N.A., Wa'f./ZZJ.tf). oHic!!, 900 E. Wayzata Boulevaru, Wayzata, MN 55391 . ~-------~--~----~-----------~--~~-~-~-~-------------~---- Dlstance:-- 13.1 miles (measured by wheel) Coursq: Rolling (to impossible) Appreximate Route: - Entry Fcc: OFFICIAL ENfRY FORM: . Splits: 1 I nile 5 mlkas 9 miles. Water: 4 \Vater stops. Return Transportation: To WaY-.li;!ta will be provid~d uponr~ClUe5t. Trcphies, mementos &. refreshmez us at "finISh. Awards: ENTRlF.5 STRICTLY UMl1ED 1'0 600 NO RACE DAY REGlSTRAnON . Ncme (L.I.., "'."./ltS!) L . I I , , I '_~ . "rAW RACE XI" "J .-'J _ ._1 "'..-..- _ J r- AQe s... Sua CJ ,.-.- 0 ~ W 'res'NO Tel"""""" ~~~. 61.u1<I... C <~""'^.. f ' ; , L l J l.to. o.,y '(<rd. i\nowlfl<}lyand a! m~' ow" ri51.. t 1,,=,'''0., O!IlIc:r Gll illl'll.nr. rnn'""SI and I or,..,/ pat(mt/g~urd["'1 hl(lI:W w~ive ~r,.j rell!.'\.~ Any Mid aU d:.ims for d.c.m.:lg.: th"t I lJr rtIV 'l1ild/ward r.'1.;y inr.u.;):;.l '''''\::1 (>1 po>J1idP/lI;(J.l1 illth!>; oM!J1I "'.l".r.$t NO".v<::;ll)arlk ~iinn"~olll. :-I.A.. ill; Jfll~a{es. or pat,-.nt. ,,,'V l.:ommUl'litjl through which :! II:: courw rum. h.>11"lili<l!l org.lrli.<atiol'\5. unJ ~(IV ""laitJWl:. Clrec[(l(. clilC'",i f.'I ''''ctod oHici~1 of t;,<:~e (II !,ldlli.\4liuns for said IOjl:lU1~ Sign;'!\lr<! I j. .1__.. J .L. Melllfto AM.... (tMlva.IIpi. Ho. ..-..i/Q< UO) r I I ~ r I I I ! r 1 .1 , I I City I I , I I r I . , .1__J... I.. ,~ S1.lo CJ , I t,1.1rtlC:pu,,"''I[ SI()naIUr" _ "~._,. N~!l( Q' guardi..'~l\ rtl1",I...~t :Jig4'l iJ l.JdlI;<.:tp.:mt j~ ..~r .is yr~ l)iI'l r I , llpC~ I , . , January 29, 1992 --- ~..------------- Mayor Barb Brancel City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 . Dear Mayor Brancel: ~-------- ---- Enclosed is a copy of the proposed amendment to the Ci~Y_9f Orono Comprehensive Sewer Policy P~an.."_.This plan was approve~-by the City Council in January'-199"2, subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. This plan amendment updates the current Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan adopted in 1980, inc~uding minor revisions to the MUSA boundary. The amendment was prepared in response to the 1988 Metropolitan Systems Information Statement, and contains updated population, household and employment forecas~s. . Any comments or questions regarding this plan amendment may be directed to me or to the Metropolitan Council. Please forward to me a copy of any responses you may send directly to the Metropolitan Council. Sincerely, / -:;U<52 f ;j~ Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. TELEPHONE - ...73-7357 . FAX - "''734)510 !:LB CK NO CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MARCH 9, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED CHECKS ISSUED SINCE FEBRUARY 18, 1992 PURPOSE 8605 8606 8607 8608 8609 8610 8611 8612 8613 8614 8615 8616 .8617 618 8619 8620 8621 8622 8623 8624 8625 8626 8627 8628 8629 8630 8631 8632 8633 .634 635 8636 8637 8638 8639 (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) Federal Express Void Commissioner of Revenue James Hurm Northern States Power Thomas MFG Company Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Hoops Trucking Johnson Brothers Liquor Mn Bar Supply Mn Victoria oil Co. North Star Ice Ed Phillips and Sons Void First State Bank Commissioner of Revenue PERA ICMA Retirement Trust City cty Credit Union Child Support Enforce. County of Anoka City of Excelsior Timothy Heiland Minnegasco Inc. Bradley Nielsen Northern States Power Joseph Pazandak US West Communications Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Harry Niemela Ed Phillips and Sons Microplan Development Overnight delivery January sales tax Conference expenses Utilities Shipping Liquor purchases Liquor,wine & misc purch Liquor and wine purch Wine purchases Misc/supplies purchases Fuel oil-utilities Misc purchases Liquor and wine purchases Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Payroll deductions Fourth quarter water charge Parks mileage utilities Sec 125 reimbursements utilities Mileage & city hall supplies Telephone service/advertising Liquor purchases Liquor purchases Liquor and wine purchases March rent for store I Liquor and wine purchases 1/2 pay-on planning software TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED -1- AMOUNT 15.50 8,687.16 148.15 1,487.90 80.76 2,154.36 4,148.74 2 5.8 . 54 879.93 110.35 95.76 163.20 1,329.49 5,863.96 914.28 1,871.85 616.28 95.00 89.10 110.59 1,785.19 4.48 1,264.98 240.00 296.19 54.75 995.12 2,070.28 107.40 2,617.62 1,564.00 2,227.21 6,750.00 22,684.08 26,414.04 49,098.12 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MARCH 9, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APROVAL 8640 8641 8642 8643 8644 8645 8646 8647 8648 8649 8650 8651 8652 8653 8654 8655 8656 8657 8658 8659 8660 8661 8662 8663 8664 8665 8666 8667 8668 8669 8670 8671 8672 8673 8674 8675 8676 8677 8678 8679 void American Natl Bank Earl F. Andersen Artworks Cellular One city of Chanhassen Chanhassen Lawn/Sport Chaska Parts Service Decker Supply EOS Architecture Financial Products Corp. Frontier Electric Grainger, Inc. Hance Hardware Hennepin County Treas. Hennepin County Treas. K-A Electrical Svcs. Kehoe Office Furnish. L-J Rubber Stamp Co. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly and Lindgren, LTD Menards Metro Area Mgmt Assoc. Commisso of Transport. Mn Mayors Assoc. Mn Suburban Publication North Star Intrntl Truck Orr, Schelen, Mayeron and Associates Pepsi-Cola Company Pepsi-Cola Company .Research Quik Shorewood Tree Svc Shorewood True Value Katie Snyder Technical Reproductions Tonka Printing Twin City Hardware US West Communications Waldor Pump/Equip Co. Waste Management Water Products . Fees on 1989, 1980 bonds Street signs Planning/zoning supplies Cellular phone air time Jan animal control PW maint supplies Vehicle maint supplies Street sign posts PW facility services Computer services/supplies Electrical services Heater motor Maintenance supplies Assessor supplies Jan prisoner expense City hall electrical svcs Office furniture Office supplies January legal fees general on-going new tif Shady Hills Building supplies Luncheon meeting Re-Iamping svcs/traffic control signal at Old Mkt 1992 membership dues Publishing 1989 Ford truck Jan engineering fees develop. on going general public works fac Old Mkt Rd Church Road Pop city hall Pop machine rental Park survey services Tree trimming/hauling svcs Desk repair supplies Council meeting minutes Map reproductions Water meter reading cards Office doors Phone services Lift station repair svcs Warming house rental Meters/access and hydrant PURPOSE 2,035.25 175.35 270.00 257.00 Rd. 433.13 475.31 3,965.28 5,510.44 2,303.44 182.81 repair TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST -2- AMOUNT 332.83 427.30 14.50 38.98 920.75 107.25 14.85 553.00 6,047.08 80.00 453.00 54.35 21.37 113.09 1,281. 75. 382.19 1,101.00 84.25 2,737.60 26.11 12.50 5,467.65 10.00 120.60 14,000.00 12,870.4. 89.50 10.00 502.79 8,160.00 7.89 200.00 51.00 44.00 422.00 27.95 5,935.64 150.00 594.94 63,468.12 112,566.24 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR MARCH 9, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR FEBRUARY 25. 1992 PAYROLL 205953 Void 205954 (L) Scott Bartlett 23.5 reg hours 129.69 205955 (G) Randie Berg 39.75 reg hours 185.06 205956 (G) Matthew Chapman 14.0 reg hours 64.64 205957 Void 205958 (G) Charles Davis 82.0 reg hours 558.26 205959 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 773.67 205960 (L) Cory Frederick 47.75 reg hours 231.62 205961 (L) John Fruth 19.0 reg hours 91.84 205962 (L) Jerry Hapnsen 11.5 reg hours 57.35 205963 (G) Timothy Heiland 28.75 reg hours 159.30 205964 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 718.50 205965 (L) Rachel Huppert 4.5 reg hours 22.44 .5966 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,440.52 05967 (L) Brian Jakel 44.5 reg hours 2.10.66 205968 (G) Dennis Johnson 80.0 reg hours 721. 97 205969 (L) Martin Jones 36.75 reg hours 171. 48 205970 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 602.99 205971 (L) Mark Karsten 19.0 reg hours 100.46 205972 (G) Douglas Koerting 25.75 reg hours 102.36 205973 (G) Jason Koerting 8.5 reg hours 39.24 205974 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 780.07 205975 (L) Susan Latterner 42.25 reg hours 202.28 205976 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours 706.75 205977 (L) Robert Lynch 7.0 reg hours 36.85 205978 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 654.27 205979 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 641.45 205980 (G) Brent Nicolle 22.5 reg hours 94.79 205981 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 924.65 .5982 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 947.18 5983 (G) Joseph Prehall 24.0 reg hours 100.40 205984 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours 732.32 205985 (L) Brian Roerick 7.0 reg hours 36.85 208986 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,060.02 205987 (L) Brian Rosenberger 15.5 reg hours 81. 59 205988 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours 378.40 205989 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours 637.40 205990 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 72.0 reg hours 420.15 205991 (G) Ralph Wehle 82.0 reg hours 598.98 205992 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 591. 95 205993 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1,140.16 205994 (G) Jeff Chiles 24.0 reg hours 110.82 TOTAL GENERAL 14,312.93 TOTAL LIQUOR 2,946.45 TOTAL PAYROLL 17,259.38 -3- BOARD of DIRECTORS Walter Levesque President Tom Ticen 1st Vice President Bob Miller 2nd Vice President Linda Stokes Secretary Carla Pavone Treasurer John Blaser Past President Daralyn Peifer Member-at-Large Ryan Schroeder Member-at-Large Toni Anderson Karl Dansky Robert DeGhetto Alison Fuhr Marty Guritz Commissioner Tad Jude Leonard Kopp Connie McCullough John Nelson Senator Gen Olson Steve Rood Russell Weinstein Bob Zagaros Benjamim F. Withhart Executive Director & C.E.O. . A United Way Supported Agency . -, IIJ2 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1600 South 2nd Street, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 933.9311 Fax 933.2101 March 3, 1992 Mayor Barbara Brancel City of Shorewood 25785 Sunnyva~ Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Brancel: As you may know, the City of Chanhassen will not be funding the Southshore Senior Center as they have in the past due to their embarking on the development of a new center to be located in the lower level of the Municipal Building. Due to this decrease, we are anticipating a cut of $3,876 in Southshore funding. We have divided the projected shortfall among the South shore cities proportionately based on the number of residents aged 60+. We hope the City of Shorewood will provide $1,221 in addition to our original request of $6,482 making the total request $7,703. /~~ce~ ~~in F. Withhart Executive Director J~~ ,-/JoAnn Kvern Center Director MAR-06-1992 12:25 FROM HENN CO ENVIR MGMT TO 1=14740128 P.02 OFFICE OF PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT Development Planning Unit 822 South Third Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis/MN 55415 (612) 348-6418 HENNEPIN March 6, 1992 Mr. Jim Hurm City of ~hoTAwnnd 5755 Country Clv.b Roa.d Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Jim: The city of Shorewood has participated in tho Urban Hennepi.n County COIlllDunl-. ty Development Block Grant Program since its establishment in 1975. During the first 17 years of the program the city has reeei~ed $566;746, of which $237,7l~ (41.9~) ~s b$en ucod for the doferred payment hOU5ing rehabilita- tion loans. Approximately 30 low- and modera.t$~income Shorewood homeowners have received assistance through the program to date. The homeowners r~cQiving the rehabilit4tion ~GGiotance arc only required to repay the "loan" if the property is sold within a ten-year period. Currently, two Sho~ewood re~identa have submitted .applications for housing reha~ilitation assistance and are on the p~ogram's waiting list. As waiting list clients, their eligibility for the program based upon household income h~o not yet been verified. Should the City elect not to fund housing rehabilitation, the households on the waiting list will be given the opportuni~ to make application !v~ ~le Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Payment Loan Program. MHFA / S program is similar to the CUBe. program except that the household i~come limits are approximAt~ly 45 percent of Lh~ ~uL.euL cnSG pro.gram income limits. In terms of one- and two-person households the following are the respective program income 11mits~ CDBG MUFA Qne Person $16,800 9,500 Two Person $19,200 10,500 Additional single family housing rehabilitation funds may become available through the new federal HOME P1:V~1:~U, uuL this will not: be known until sometime this swnmer. Should you need any additional information, pleas~ CUUt.ClCt. me at 348-5659. ~ee~. if/ . ~tad Senior Pltl.nner HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunl1y employer ORDINANCE NO. -25l. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1201 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO ZONING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1: Section 1201.24, Subd. 3.d.(2) of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: . "(2) Rear yard Not less than 50 feet (from the ordinary high water mark)" Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this 9 th day of March, 1992. ATTEST: . CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. MINUTES Chair Benson called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. \)\l~~"' CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Present: Chair Benson; Commissioners Rosenberger, Hansen, Leslie and Schultz; Council Liaison Gagne; Planning Director Nielsen. Absent: Commissioner Malam. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Schultz moved, Leslie seconded to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of 4 February 1992 as written. Motion carried - 5-0. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK IN THE LAKESHORE-RECREATIONAL (L-R) DISTRICT Planning Director Nielsen reviewed his report stating that in 1985 the City established a 75- foot lakeshore setback requirement for Lake Minnetonka, consistent with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The MCWD later revised its requirement to 50 feet, consistent with State shoreland management regulations, when it realized that Shorewood was entirely served by city sewer. Subsequently, in 1986, the City revised its requirement back to the 50-foot requirement. A recent inquiry by the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club brought to the attention of the City that the lakeshore setback for the L-R, Lakeshore-Recreational District was never changed from 75 to 50 feet when the setback was changed for other zoning districts. It is suggested that the Code be amended at the City's own initiative. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 7:05 P.M. Skip Jewett of the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club, was present to listen and made no comments. Robert Rascop, Enchanted Point, said he is in favor of the 50-foot setback, but does have concerns about the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club itself. Chair Benson said the issues discussed need to remain strictly on the L-R District setback, and not stray to private development matters, such as the Yacht Club's individually. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 7: 12 P.M. ~ Planning Commission Minutes 18 February 1992 Hansen moved, seconded by Leslie to recommend to Council approval of reduction of the lakeshore setback in the L-R, Lakeshore-Recreational District to 50 feet. Schultz said he is concerned about the intensity of use by commercial facilities and does not want to see it increase by reducing the setback. Nielsen explained that parking can be located 50 feet from the lake, regardless of the building setbacks, and if buildings are forced back to the 75-foot setback, parking tends to end up on the lakeshore side of the site. Allowing buildings at the 50-foot setback may reverse this effect. Gagne remarked that he believes the Howard's Point Marina has not taken steps to rezone and comply with zoning regulations because they don't want to spend money on required improvements. Benson said he feels lake access is desirable, and he doesn't object to the 50-foot setback. Rosenberger said he agrees with Schultz and does not feel the current 75-foot setback is a problem. Hansen feels the 75-foot setback is relative to on-site sewer systems, and that the City should address the existing uses. Motion carried - 3-2 (Rosenberger, Schultz - nay~) This item will appear on the Council agenda of 9 March 1992. INTRODUCTION OF PARK COMMISSION LIAISON - STEVEN DZURAK Steve Dzurak appeared to introduce himself as Park Commission liaison to the Planning Commission. He said he intends to review Planning Commission agendas and minutes and attend Planning Commission meetings on an as-needed basis. . Benson. and Schultz suggested that Mr. Dzurak remind the Park Commission that the Planning Commission has strongly recommended in favor of a permanent structure at Manor Park for warming house purposes, and that they should budget for saine. INFORMAL DISCUSSION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ISSUES Nielsen reviewed a list of issues prepared by the Planning Department in a memorandum dated 18 February 1992. The Commission suggested the following additional issues be studied: - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes 18 February 1992 Hanson suggested that the City review its policies regarding clearing trees on public property . Rosenberg suggests that senior housing is a significant issue to be addressed. The Commission agreed that a more active approach by the City may be necessary. Rosenberg feels that the City should consider increased control on garbage haulers as a means to protecting streets. The Commission agreed that efforts should continue to share more services with surrounding communities. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR None. REPORTS None. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Patti Helgesen Planning/Zoning Dept. - 3 -