The URL can be used to link to this page

021092 CC Reg AgP ... CITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. 7:00 P.M. - CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Lewis Mayor Brancel Gagne stover Daugherty C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Meeting/Work Session - January 24, 1992 (Att.NO.2A-Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to ApDrove Consent Aqenda and AdoDt Resolutions Therein A. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Proclaiming Volunteers of America Week (Att.No.3A-Resolution and Letter of Request) B. A Motion to Approve a Lease Agreement with Ryan Properties for the Shorewood Liquor store (Att.No.3B-Agreement) C. A Motion to Adopt a Resolution Designating "No Parking" on a Portion of Howards Point Road (Att.No.3C-Resolution) D. A Motion Approving a Resolution for Engineering Services for the Rehabilitation of Lift stations No. 7 and 11 (Att.No.3D-Resolution) 4. COMMISSION REPORT A. Planning Commission B. Park Commission - ~ COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10, 1991 Page Two 5. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATING A PORTION OF GARDENDALE ROAD Applicant: Thomas Doherty Location: Gardendale R.oad at Manor Road (Att.No.5-A-Planner's Memorandum and Att.No.5-B-Proposed Resolution) 6. SITE PLAN REVIEW / SIGN PE:RMIT - FLOORS OF MINNETONKA Applicant: Richard Johnson Location: 5660 County Road 19 (Att..NO.6A-Planner's Memo 1/30/92; 6B-Planner's Memo 2/4/92) 7. DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPROV~L - GIDEON'S COVE P.U.D. Applicant: Boyer Construction Co. Location: Lawtonka Dri.ve (Att~.No. 7-Planner' s Memorandum) a. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1201.19 - R.C. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Applicant: Bill Norman Location: R-C Zoning District (Att:. No. a-Planner' s Memorandum and Ordi.nance) 9 . A RESOLUTION APPROVING 'p. SET BACK VARIANCE Applicant: Location: Richard Kowalsky 5740 Christmas Lake Point (Att:.No.9-Proposed Resolution) 10. A RESOLUTION APPROVING }~ AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A REVISION TO THE CITY'S SEWER ACCESS CHARGE (Att:. No. 10-Resolution) 11. A RESOLUTION INITIATING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING FOR THE ACQUISITIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE CHURCH ROAD PROJECT (Att:.NO.11-Resolution) 12. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR .. . COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10, 1992 Page Three 13. STAFF REPORTS A. city Attorney B. City Engineer C. Planning Director D. City Administrator 1. Report on Knutson Services, Inc. Recycling (Att.No. D-1-Knutson Letter) 2. Board of Review Date (Att.No. D-2-Notice copy) 3. city Policies (Att.No. D-3-Policy) 4. Preliminary 1991 Budget Report (Att.No.4-Finance Director's Report) 5. Establish CDBG Program Year XVIII Hearing Date (Att.No.5-CDBG Development Program) 6. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations-control of Lead and Copper in Medium-Size Water Systems (Att.No.6-Letter and Memorandum) 14. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Mayor Brancel 1. 1992 Hennepin county Fair (Att.NO.14-1-Letter of Request) 2. Resident Letter Regarding safety in S. E. Area of the City (Att.NO.14-2-Resident Letter) B. Councilmembers Report 15. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Attachment Claims List) JCH.al 2/5/92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1992 AGENDA ITEM 3A - This is a resolution the Council has passed annually designating the week of March 1 - 8, as Volunteers of America Week in Shorewood. . , 1 AGENDA ITEM 3B - This is a two year extension of our lease with Ryan Properties for the west Shorewood Liquor store. The current rent is $2,115 per month. This lease would increase that rent as of October 1, 1991 to $2,200 per month and October 1, 1992 to $2,400 per month. This was negotiated by Bill Josephson at the direction of the previous Liquor Commission. There are no other changes. . AGENDA ITEM 3C - It can be difficult to get to Howards Point Road between Island View Road and Edgewood Road, primarily during the winter months, when fishermen park their vehicles on both sides of the road. This area has been posted "No Parking" on the west side during much of this winter. The enclosed resolution would prohibit parking on the west side on this designated area, year round. Copies of the resolution were mailed to adjacent property owners. If anyone from the area attends, the Council may want to take this item off the Consent calendar. . I ., . AGENDA ITEM 3D - We have budgeted for the rehabilitation of two lift stations in 1992, the enclosed resolution approves an agreement for engineering services to be completed on an hourly basis, not to exceed $15,000. AGENDA ITEM 5 - This resolution establishes 7:15 pm, March 9, 1992 at the regular Council meeting for a public hearing on the proposal of Mr. Thomas Doherty, 20375 Manor Road, to trade land with city for a Gardendale Road r.o.w. A memorandum with explanation and map are enclosed in the packet. AGENDA ITEM 6 - Action would be a motion to approve a sign permit for Floors of Minnetonka to be located at 5660 County Road 19. The Planning commission has recommended approval contingent upon the following: a) change roof sign to a wall sign; b) provide staff with a design for the pylon sign. The Building Official must approve use of the right pole as a support for the sign. c) provide staff with a design for the window. Advertisement shall not exceed 25% of the total allowable sign area (19 sq. ft.) Page Two - Executive Summary - February 10, 1992 AGENDA ITEM 7 The Planning Commission has recommended development stage approval for Gideon's Cove P.U.D. Please read the enclosed memorandum carefully. It discusses the main issues including dock rights and lists nine specific recommendations. The action would be to consider a motion directing the staff to prepare a resolution giving development stage approval which includes approval of the preliminary plat. AGENDA ITEM 8 - Bill Norman had requested that this change in the R-C Residential Commercial District zoning ordinance be tabled to this meeting. As of this date we have not heard from Mr. Norman. AGENDA ITEM 9 - This is a resolution and findings of fact granting a request for a set back variance to build a two car garage and a variance to alter the non-conforming structur~ within the confines of the existing house, at 5740 Christmas Lake Point. Council had directed this resolution to be prepared. AGENDA ITEM 10 - As a result of discussions held during 1991 with the City Council, we have prepared an agreement with OSM engineering to assist staff in reviewing the City's sewer access charge. The City staff will then present a draft ordinance update to the City Council for their review in April. This resolution authorizes and agreement for services based on an hourly rate not to exceed $500. AGENDA ITEM 11 - The City has not been able to come to terms with one of the Church Road Project residents. As a result, for the project to proceed we have drafted a resolution relating findings of public purpose for the acquisition of easements and right-of-way for street and watermain improvements for Church Road. AGENDA ITEM 13D-1 - Mark Heieren, Sales Manager Knutson Services, Inc., will be present to discuss with the city Council problems within the recycling industry. AGENDA ITEM 13D-3 - In conjunction with the commitments'agreed to by the City Council, at the first meeting in January, the staff has developed a set of Shorewood city Values. The introduction to the values briefly describes the role of the city Council and city staff and states that the team makes decisions and acts based on a strong set of values. It then specifically lists those values. Please review them and make any changes you see fit and consider accepting the Shorewood City Values by motion. . . JCH.al 2/6/92 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY. JANUARY 27, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 1 M I NUT E S 1. CALL TO ORDER A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel, Councilmembers Gagne, Stover, Daugherty and Lewis, City Administrator Hurm, City Attorney Sellergren, City Engineer Dresel, City Finance Director Rolek and City Planner Nielsen. . Absent: C. REVIEW AGENDA Mayor Brancel asked that item 7A be added, a discussion concerning No Parking on Howards Point Road. Daugherty moved, Gagne seconded to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried - 5/0 Mayor Brancel introduced Jim Daniels, the new Administrator for the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. Daniels said he has just started with the Cable Commission and has met with all the City Councils. He informed the Council that he had 17 years experience in the Cable Television field. . Councilmember Gagne asked Daniels to check into the Channel six reception. Brancel said they received a report at the last Cable Commission meeting. Daniels said there might be a factor. Gagne said Channel is a way to enhance the reception, however, cost He said he will work with Triax. six was part of the agreement with the cable company. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Executive Session - January 13, 1992 Gagne moved. Stover seconded to approve the City Council Executive Session minutes of January 13, 1992. Motion carried - 5/0 B. City Council Regular Meeting ~ January 13, 1992 . cZA 1 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27. 1992 - PAGE 2 Stover moved. Daugherty seconded to approve the Regular City Council minutes of January 13. 1992. Motion carried - 5/0 3. CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION NO. 6-92 RESOLUTION NO. 7-92 RESOLUTION NO. 8-92 RESOLUTION NO. 9-92 Gagne moved. Stover seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and adopt the Resolutions therein. Pay Request - A & K Construction - Water Treatment Plant Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6-92 "A Resolution Adopting General . Records Retention Schedule," Motion to adopt a Resolution Accepting a Variance from MnDot on Old Market Road. Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 7-92 "Resolution Approving Amendments to the 1991 Budget." Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 8-92 "A Resolution Specifying an Old Market Road on-Street Bike Lane." Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 9-92 "A Resolution Designating a Speed Limit for Old Market Road and Covington Road." Motion to Approve Sign Permit Location: 22920 State HwY 7 Applicant: Hilltop Family Restaurant Motion carried - 5/0 4. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT - SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES . Applicant: Location: North Suburban Development. Inc. Strawberry Lane Stover moved. Gagne seconded to approve A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Shorewood Suburban Estates. Motion carried - 5/0 5. A MOTION ADOPTING A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE 1992 BUDGET INCLUDING TRANSFERS FROM CONTINGENCY FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE Finance Director Rolek reported that the amendments to the budget are due to adjustments in the purchases of planning and clerical software and personnel salaries. He said the software was not purchased in 1991 and has increased in price due to a change in the operating system. 6. DISCUSSION OF CITY STAFF ENGINEER POSITION 2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1992 - PAGE 3 Administrator Hurm reported that he analyzed the engineering costs for the years 1991, 1990 and 1986 as directed by the Council. He indicated none of these years was a slow year for building in Shorewood. Therefore the analysis did not help in terms of a slow year. He said the Engineering position would be cost effective but the efficiency of the position was the main reason for the recommendation. Hurm said. if the Council is concerned about the timing of the hiring, perhaps it can be looked at over a one or two year period of time. He felt there should be a clear consensus on the City Council to establish such a position. Brancel said she agrees with Hurm, that there should be a consensus among the Councilmembers. ~ Councilmember Daugherty asked what additional benefits will have to be included in the budget for the Engineer. Hurm said these costs were all included in the budget. Councilmember Lewis said he strongly agreed with the staff position regarding a Staff Engineer. He said he is willing to back off and let the review process continue. Hurm said City Engineer Dresel has agreed to make recommendations to lower consulting fees. Lewis said he appreciates OSM's efforts ln helping with this review. ~ Daugherty suggested the City monitor the costs for six months and then review. The Council agreed with him. Brancel asked Hurm if a budget amendment will be needed. He said it will. 7. ESTABLISH A DATE TO INTERVIEW COMMISSION APPLICANTS Hurm said applications have been received from some Park and Planning Commission members and the City has advertised in the paper for applicants for these Commissions as well as the Senior Housing Task Force. Stover said the advertisement was somewhat misleading but has since been remedied. The Council agreed to meet on February 19. 1992 at 7:00 P.M. to interview Commission applicants. Stover announced that the City is looking for members on its Planning Commission, Park Commission and Senior Housing Task Force. .~ '. . , REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1992 - PAGE 4 7A. NO PARKING HOWARD'S POINT ROAD Hurm said the police department has asked for a No Parking Sign on one side of Howard's Point Road. He said the issue will be on the February 10th agenda. 8. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CLAIMS. Gagne moved, Stover seconded to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 P.M. Motion carried - 5/0 GENERAL AND LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NUMBER 00-00166-02 . Checks issued since January 10, 1992 Check No. 8309-8381 LIQUOR $ 88,872.87 GENERAL $ 53,935.22 $142.808.09 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED Checks for Council approval Checks No. 8382-8426 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL $ 93,868.85 TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST .. $236,676.94 CHECK REGISTER FOR JANUARY 14. 1991 PAYROLL Checks no. 205815/205859 LIQUOR GENERAL $3.374.00 $15.165.40 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $18.539.40 1. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION The joint City Council/Planning Commission work session was reconvened at 7:35 P.M. 4 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27. 1992 - PAGE 5 Planning Commission Members present: and Hanson. Benson, Rosenberger, Malam Absent: Leslie and Schultz 2. DISCUSS A WORK SCHEDULE FOR UPDATING SHOREWOOD'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Planner Nielsen said this is the first of a series of proposed meetings to review the planning process and work program for 1992. Nielsen said the Comprehensive Plan was started in 1977 and adopted by the City in 1981. The Plan has been amended three times. . He added that this plan is a starting point. The Council will have to pare down the eight documents and either keep, add, delete or modify them. He said the first stage of the planning process is: 1. Planning Tactics, which identifies issues and establishes a work program. 2. Planning Inventory, which identifies the physical, economic and social attributes of the City and is sorely in need of updating. 3. Policy Plan, which sets broad goals and objectives for the City and determines general and specific policies to achieve the goals. Nielsen said the Staff has developed a suggested Work Program. . He said the work program establishes the timing for plans, projects and programs and the implementation of these programs is reflected in areas such as the Zoning Ordinance or the Shoreline Management Plan. Nielsen added, since this is an ongoing process, there should be a section added for an annual update of the plan. Nielsen explained that the Planning Tactics/Strategy and Inventory are the first parts of the Work Program to be done. He said the issues survey has already been given to the Park Commission and Planning Commission and said the Council will prioritize these issues at it's February meeting. The Planning Inventory should be available in April. He said the Policy Plan/Development Framework, which has four components, will be reviewed with some sections, such as Transportation, requiring more work. Stover informed the members that in 1980 the Comprehensive Plan was mandated by the Metropolitan Council and the City "at that time" added sections to comply with the Met. Council's mandate. 5 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27. 1992 - PAGE 6 Nielsen agreed with her but added the revision of the Plan can be more City oriented than the current plan. He said the Met. Council attempted to add the water supply as a 5th metro system but the idea has been dropped. Instead. the Cities will have to address a water supply in their local plans. Nielsen said the Met. Council had more "teeth" in 1980 than it seems to have now. However. he added, they must still review the plan. Hurm said the goal is to key in on what the City wants. He asked for input from the Commission members and Council and indicated five CIP meetings have been scheduled and asked if they thought a joint meeting per month is advisable. Hurm said the Planning Commission is the first to review the revisions but there should be periodic reviews by the Council to obtain their input and decide on form of the report. ~ Lewis said he would like a concise report. not all the material. Rosenburger said the CIP should flow from the Comprehensive Plan. Nielsen said that is why the Planning Inventory is done first and then projects are identified. Gagne said water will still be an issue. He said they just approved a subdivision in which City water was available within 1000 ft. of the project. He said the City should devise a policy for these situations. Daugherty asked the Planning Commission if they follow the objectives listed in the Comprehensive Plan. when making decisions. Rosenberger said he is evolving toward that end. He said he has ~ only been on the Planning Commission for seven months and said the staff has been very helpful. He said the CIP is useful to the Council but it should flow from the Compo Plan. Daugherty said he is glad to have this opportunity to have a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and asked if they had any questions to ask the Council. Benson said he is also glad for this opportunity because it allows more interplay between the two bodies and allows better communication. Nielsen said the City should schedule public meetings to obtain input from residents. Daugherty said he is glad the Plan is not tied to the Met. Council. Stover said a Comprehensive Plan was a good idea of the Met. Council but in 1980 it had to be approved by the surrounding communities. 6 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27. 1992 - PAGE 7 Hanson said there should be a positive relationship between the Council and Planning Commission because the Council can bring the ideas of the residents to the meetings because they are the elected officials. Hurm asked what the City's position should be toward the types and timing of public input. Stover said the Planning Commission can ask for citizen input but often has to make decisions based on good planning for the whole City. . Lewis said the Council can obtain citizen input and then do good planning. Hurm said round table discussions are not a good forum to televise. Rosenberger said Cities often take the position to decide, announce and defend and he thought this had happened with the water situation in Shorewood. He said citizens won't attend meetings until an issue becomes important to them. He said the City should be as open as possible. Stover said citizens often get the wrong idea if work sessions are televised. Statements made in passing can cause misunderstandings. Hurm said they can encourage the written media to attend meetings. . Benson said there should be continual meetings not just one Public Hearing on a topic. Lewis said controversial issues should be kept in the Compo Plan so that residents know they have to be addressed. Stover said sometimes residents say they are worn down on an issues when too many meetings are scheduled. Hurm said some of the goals in the work program will extend into 1993 but they will try to work within the plan. Hanson said people often believe what is said on television and it can be very powerful to have the work sessions televised. Malam asked what sections the Met. Council will study. Nielsens said some sections such as the Corridor Study and the MWCC. 7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1992 - PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT OF JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL WORK SESSION Stover moved, Gagne seconded to adjourn the work study session at 8:52 P.M. Motion carried - 5/0 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Katie Snyder Recording Secretary MAYOR BARBARA BRANCEL CITY ADMINISTRATOR JAMES HURM 8 . . . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 1 - 8 AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK WHEREAS, Volunteers of America is one of this nation's and Minnesota's largest human service organizations and has been helping others for nearly 96 years; and WHEREAS, Volunteers of America wishes to schedule March 1 - 8 as Volunteers of America Week to commemorate its founding on March 8, 1896; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Council desires to encourage those in the Shorewood community who receive care through the services of Volunteers of America and recognize the dedicated staff and volunteers and the many people who help support its work through their financial contributions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the city of Shorewood joins in celebrating the 96th year of service of Volunteers of America. 2. That March 1 - 8, 1992, is hereby proclaimed Volunteers of America week in Shorewood, Minnesota. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 10th day of February 1992. Barbara J. Brancel,Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator .....- 3A JAH Z 8 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MINNESOTA 5905 Golden Valley Road . Minneapolis. MN 55422 . (612)546-3242 January 24, 1992 The Honorable Barb Brancel Mayor of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Brancel: Volunteers of America Week is scheduled for March 1-8, 1992 which commemorates the founding of our organization on March 8, 1896. As one of Minnesota's and the nation's largest human service organizations, . the Volunteers of America has been helping others for 96 years. I am asking you to proclaim the week in our behalf. Your personal proclamation will be encouraging to those in the Shorewood community who receive care through our services. Through the years, Volunteers of America has demonstrated it is a dynamic organization, able to keep up with the everchanging world around it. Now more than ever, we recognize the constant need for developing new and more creative ways to solve problems, meet community needs, and improve the overall quality of life for all members of our society. We must continue forming partnerships, to bridge the gap between social service needs and private sector social responsibility. Your interest and support of our organization. And, as the lives of those we touch. makes a significant impact on the success you know, our success is measured thrOUgh. Respectfully yours, 0:::. :T~ President JEH/dc Enclosures P. S. Your proclamation, along with other proclamations and/or congratulatory letters, will be duplicated and put into booklet form. A booklet commemorating our 96th birthday will be placed in the reception area of each of our programs. RYAN PROPERTIES, INC. 700 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis. MN 55402 612/339-984 7 ~YAN Please reply to: 7500 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Telephone: 612/829-5829 Fax: 612/829-0201 January 21. 1992 . Mr. Bill Josephson Shorewood Liquor 23730 Highway 7 Shorewood. MN 55331 Dear Bill: Enclosed please find four (4) copies of Lease Amendment No. 8 for your space at Shorewood Village Center. Please sign and return all copies to our Eden Prairie address listed above. Upon our final approval we will return two (2) fully executed copies for your files. Thank you. . Sincerely. RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ~?~LU:--IJt~,:, ~ , , I J~L~~ M. Jensen ! Administrative Assistant Enclosure cc: Wendy Madsen John Kelly 30 LEASE AMENDMENT NO. 8 The term of that certain Lease dated December 30. 1974. Amendment No. 1 dated May. 1978. Amendment No.2 dated May. 1981. Amendment No.3 dated June 6. 1984. Amendment No. 4 dated March 6. 1985. Amendment No. 5 dated February 13. 1986. Amendment No.6 dated June 24. 1987. Amendment No.7 dated October 1. 1990 by and between Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. Inc. as Landlord and City of Shorewood. as Tenant for premises in the Shorewood Village Shopping Center. Shorewood. Minnesota. is hereby further extended by mutual consent for a two year period commencing October 1. 1991 and ending September 30. 1993. . Commencing October 1. 1991 and ending September 30. 1992 monthly rent shall be Two Thousand Two Hundred and No/100 ($2.200.00). Commencing October 1. 1992 and ending September 30. 1993. monthly rent shall be Two Thousand Four Hundred and No/l00 ($2.400.00). No additional amounts shall be due for common maintenance. insurance. real estate tax or the cooler. Except as defined above. all other terms. conditions. covenants and agreements of the Lease dated December 30. 1974 and all other Amendments. shall remain in effect. Witness our hands this day of . 1992. LANDLORD: Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. Inc. . By: Its: TENANT: City of Shorewood By: Its: . . RESOLUTION NO. ____-92 A RESOLUTION PROHIBITING PARKING ALONG SECTIONS OF HOWARDS POINT ROAD WHEREAS, Howards Point Road is a narrow rural design street with no defined parking area; and WHEREAS, during certain times of the year vehicles parked along both sides of Howards Point Road between Island View Road and Edgewood Road make passage difficult for emergency vehicles, school buses and the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that parking of vehicles is hereby prohibited on the west side of Howards Point Road from Island View Road to Edgewood Road. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 10th day of February 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3~ - CITY OF. SHOREWOOO ;' NO OWNED ~ ADDRESS OW/'.JE~ ~~ Y 55~S H<)w, pT:" R.D . , " .' ,'- f ,3.,,, .,. -.-. - , , ~ oCr-. l'C" ~ '- L, \.JL., (I) . ( 2) ~54b? ... --___t. . ---------------------------- ) ~l ,......... 11541 DEED II~I. ~ 'c:...s , I I OO@ ~ I IR l ~ :~ , . P~T ~ TRACT A ( 16) ,... :;:; - ( 17) , I I I . :...~.:YT ~ ~~ --. ,..- " ( I')) c; 8 ~ ~ (II) :<'! ... , .,' [L ~ c .: 119 l' , " Oiil 1 . '. . ~ . . .... 2~ H (9) ~ ~ ("3) 991.n 9sr.17 8 ( 12) ~1~ ~~ at i ... ~ 6 4 ( 12) ~[Q)[Q)OO r- . . , ....1 RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF LIFT STATIONS 7 AND 11 Whereas, the City Council has directed Orr.Schelen-Mayeron and Associates, Inc., consulting engineers, to complete the plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of lift stations 7 and 11 and to provide construction observation for said project; and WHEREAS, such work is to be completed on an hourly basis, not to exceed $15,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the design agreement (attached) for said services is hereby approved and authorized to be executed by the City Administrator. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota this 10th day of February, 1992. ATIEST: James c. Hurm City Administrator Barbara J. Brancel Mayor 3D FEE 05 '92 09:57 OSM MPLS, MN P.4 DESIGN AGREEMENT 1bis Agreement is entered into between the City of Shorewood and Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., pursuant to the tenns in their Contract for Consulting Engineering Services. Pr:oject No: 92-11 Project Description:Rehabilitation of Uft Stations 7 and 11. Scope of Services: As defined under Article 2.1.2 "Basic Services" with the following modifications: A The feasibility report stage activities are deleted. B. A maximum of 40 hours of construction observation and 10 hours of Contract Administration are included in the estimated cost. Schedule: Plans and specifications will be ready for advertising by March 23, 1992. Construction during the 1992 construction season. Compensation: Hourly basis with a maximum of $15,000.00. Deliverables: Drawings consisting of lift station modifications. Specifications consisting of the technical sections for the modifications. Signed: ~.h' ---- ~~Q) )('~~"~~ Edward J. DeI:aForest, P.E. James C. Hurm Vice President City Administrator . . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 5 February 1992 RE: Proposed Partial Street Vacation - Gardendale Road FILE NO.: 405 (92.05) . Mr. Thomas Doherty owns the property located at 20375 Manor Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), which abuts the east side of Gardendale Road, a platted, but undeveloped street right-of-way. Gardendale Road separates his homestead parcel from a triangular shaped parcel on the west side of the r.o.w., upon which his driveway is located. Mr. Doherty requests that the City of Shorewood vacate a portion of Gardendale Road adjoining his home. Gardendale Road serves as the only access to an approximately three acre site south of Doherty's. The owner, James Beal, was granted a permit almost two years ago to clear an access path to his property. That approval specified that construction of a driveway would require an additional r.o.w. permit at such time as someone applies for a building permit for the Beal property. Review of that request revealed that the right-of-way comes extremely close to Mr. Doherty's house. In fact a recent survey by Mr. Doherty (see Exhibit B, attached) indicates that his house actually encroaches onto the right-of-way. Mr. Doherty's survey shows the portion he would like vacated. At our direction he has also shown a portion of his westerly parcel which he proposes to trade back to the City so that the Beal property will still have access. . This report does not attempt to analyze the proposal, although at first look, it appears to have merit. It is intended to provide background information and review procedure. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5 First, the City Council must schedule a public hearing. Included in your packet is a proposed resolution setting a hearing for 9 March. A detailed staff report will be prepared prior to that hearing. The Planning Commission will review the subdivision and combination of Doherty's property necessary to effectuate the trade. This item is scheduled for their review on 3 March 1992. The Council will have their recommendation when it reviews the vacation request on 9 March. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact my office. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Dave Sellergren Joel Dresel Thomas Doherty Joe Zwak - 2 - . . , . I : ., . ::;.ao::...... :: . '- (: I _ ~J .. . N _...... I . .. I : \.... : : ( 27) !-..L_________ . I , , , I I . I _!_-------.: I 51 I I I : .~"; .<'7r~' I , . I I . I I , I t I I I I I , I ..... 135. 9"'~ ,~----------------~ ,..~~ \ 99-03. : \ - I \. ...J,;.....,.. : \ ~,r. "\ ..... ;.,..... . " ( 25) - ~;' ,\ ., \ \ (6) \ \ \ \ ~ t ..... I __ 48.93 1'2 ( 28) ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '1'.: OlA ~ (20) ~ 1'3e --~ ~ 10S ~ ^' )c~. -'. :.i~ ~ :/\?:- . ,--. 53 ( 15) ('3) -- : 220 ... "'0 n h J ,. 6l · UJf) ~ ::..,- ,... .. ~ f (~q) ........10 R...... ~"l. ....,OfLrt y ~ PART Of LOT 49 ( 10) 140.88 ISO ;;:; '" -10'3: 45- ~,~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~:.,? 15'R O;....~ 241.5 . 220 1 '" !::! PART Of LOT 49 (7) 69 ('33) \ , \ \ \\ , \ \ "\ 45 ' \ :;.xO \ -". .' - ", - ~,. " \\ \ \ \, \\ ... L_ (4) ~ , ) . ""'" ( 19) (5) . - :.. ~ - " '00. ) ~ ,-----,if /' '....:~t //\7" "", _..-- o -'. .... u .;;,. . ..,.1(69.~ . '. ~. t '- >.~:o!.~ ...- .=~ ~ ^' 10 -~;'" ~s""" '. s; ( 29) ('30 . - ( 28) i , '20 R ~ LOT 48 ( I) ~ 't,. o ".), ~ 1.'" ~ '1,,<"7 ~ ~o"' ~rr I\. 1\.' \D " '" 0-'" '0 ~ ~. ~ (-~ 'P~t lOt\. +., b.e..~. ~~)' , / +-rt.\.d~A bAvK ;-0 '-. ~~~1l"...., q"st CO.-He... 0 t ,,~t \ \.~~"" r.o.~.) c "+1 -0 -a ..!: 01 -"2 ......N o ...1>- o c:..-~ o 4 -S \I ~ ~ .- ...,. -- r ..... 0 "'- <:i 'lI uJ ;l: J: .. ~ort~ I II , = ~O 2 ~ -:: ... .- "'1 - /'1' 1 .-" J .: v.t'.,.i ...; / ~:...- . ,.....t.,.... '--' . {_ ~?' . POt't., c" l'"'~t. v~~,(,J +0 b..t.. "A(A.t~ I ...- I ',' ... - - \_; , ,I, (....~ ~ 1- ../ . I VI uJ (jJ ::.- ~~rt'l ~~~~l"(,(.. \-Z.O '0 '2:7 :1 \-\ov~e. ~ , ~ 30 'vJ o o (JJ o o . , , ';' , , , \G:,. '2. '," I .~ ~ ..t -0 S ~ ~ \! This survey shows the location of an existin~ house in relation to the boundaries of Garden- dale Road adj~cent to Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor Second Addition. It does not purport to show Rny other improvements or encroachment5. Leqal Description of ~dditional Dohertv parcel: That part of Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor SGcona "dition Ivina Northeasterlv of n line ~rawn ~\\, b4!t ~ . . . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF A PUBLIC STREET The City Council of the City of Shorewood does resolve: That on the 9th day of March, 1992, at 7:15 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers at the City Hall, the Council will hear all interested parties upon the question of vacation of a portion of a public street in the City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: "That part of Gardendale Road dedicated in the plat of Minnetonka Manor Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the point of intersection of the West line of said Gardendale Road with a line parallel with and 20 feet northeasterly of, measured at right angles to, "Line A" described as follows: "Line A" being a line drawn from a point in the Northwesterly line of Lot 1, Minnetonka Manor Second Addition, distant 149.4 feet northeasterly from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 1 to a point in the easterly line of said Lot 1 distant 106.36 feet south along said easterly line from the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 1; thence southeasterly parallel with said "Line A" a distance of 27 feet; thence southeasterly deflecting right 32 degrees to its intersection with the East line of Gardendale Road, and said line there ending." That notice of said hearing shall be published two (2) consecutive weeks commencing the 19th day of February, 1992, in the Excelsior and Shorewood edition of the SAILOR NEWSPAPERS, the legal newspaper for said City. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of February, 1992. Barbara 1. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen . DATE: 30 January 1992 RE: Johnson, Richard - Site Plan Review - Proposed Carpet Store FILE NO,: 405 (92.01) BACKGROUND . Mr. Richard Johnson has applied for a commercial certificate of occupancy, pursuant to Section 1201.07 of the City Code, to open a retail carpet store at 5660 County Road 19 (former Tom Thumb store - see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The subject property is zoned C-3, General Commercial and contains approximately 38,311 square feet of area. Surrounding land use and zoning are as follows: north - vacant, zoned C- 3 east - Minnetonka Plaza Shopping Center (in Tonka Bay), zoned commercial south - LC.O. gas station, zoned C-3 west - American Legion, zoned C-3 The applicant proposes to remodel the interior of the existing 3000 square foot building. The exterior will remain unchanged at this time. --ANAL YSIS/RECOMMENDATION The existing building conforms to current setbacks for the C-3 District. Carpet stores are specifically included as permitted uses in that district. The site as it currently exists is substandard in several ways, all of which have to do with parking. At the direction of the staff, the applicant proposes the following improvements (see Exhibit B): A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore (PA '" 1. ! The parking lot currently has no defined access on County Road 19. The applicant will remove approximately 70 feet of existing bituminous, reducing the curb cut to 30 feet at the north end of the parking lot. This width has been approved by the Hennepin County Transportation Department. 2. The parking lot will be repaved and striped to include 11 spaces. This exceeds the minimum number required for this type of use (retail sales with 50% of floor area devoted to storage would require eight spaces for a building of this size) . 3. Continuous poured concrete curbing will be installed around the perimeter of the parking lot. The County requires this to change to bituminous at the r.o.w. line. 4. Due to concerns with drainage on County Road 19, the County will require bituminous curbing from the south side of the driveway to the southernmost corner of the lot. . 5. Drainage will be conducted to a proposed catch basin on the north side of the new drivway and piped into the drainage ditch which crosses the north side of the site. The City Engineer has reviewed this proposal and recommends in favor of this solution. 6. The area between the parking lot curb and the street curb (approximately 32' x 80') will be sodded. In addition to the above, it is recommended that the applicant provide an enclosed area for trash (perhaps on the south side of the building behind the loading area). . Since the necessary improvements can not be completed until spring, it is recommended that the applicant be required to submit a cash escrow or letter of. credit in the amount of 150 % of the cost of the work. The applicant has submitted bids for this purpose. Based upon the preceding, it is recommended that the site plan and certificate of occupancy be approved. cc: Jim Hurm Joel Dresel Dave Sellergren Rick Johnson - 2 - I~ 14r: \ ' -- . \ 't'~\ .~ 55 118.5 .... '. ) I (7) ~ Il,lt! c; 00 100 ~ ~ ~ 8 .. 5) .~ ,--' ~<: . NoY"th l"~~' : 145. 5 I 22: I I I I , , I I I I 9) i ( 18)~ : ') .. ~, i:.:,... I ,~. "i-.. \--' .--.. ..... :0 ~:g _.~ ~... 6'":: _:~ .75 ~.~~ ( IT) . _.?.,. 4& ... ~ ---..,-------- ... <'.... . ..... i.f l~ ;;>.47 ~~(~l)_~.r: i, l~ ;').r?J.;>, 7!P"'- , I.~r .1.'" '1:~ .yJ)~ :! b ~ :j' ... ~ :r'i'$'~ ,..,1. 4&'). ~" ~ . C,. ~"5755 =-.-< PART Of' LOT 6 ( 22) 5 (21 ) (46) \"\' ;5l; : .: I , I . . , . I . I " : ' I' . I I I , I I ---f-----~--~1 I . I I . I , I . . . I .....;.......210.............; : I ---i------------1 .- " ././ / ',' . . .~. :,...,.. .....1"'. ~ 63 ~ N ( 67) II'l (31 ) 20 ( 27) ... 21 ~ ( 2(3) -) 22 ..: ~ (29) 23 ~ .....::....... -..._-~ 24 ,------------- I 153. 75 , I I I I ,- , . .,.., ,N ,N I . I I I , .- yo .- (32) 100 921 .,. Q .'::""' / __J<'.' 26 ( 12) ~ \J 10 j Utt ~Cte.. 6 R 6 R I : '~"144.n : .~.;// : /. .,~/ ,,' ij~~ (IO;~ 35 R 23 (3) 24 c:r: ~ ( i J) :J. ,- , (4) ,,:/, .J ...:.,..- / "," ....~... .'-" --- '.:: .--'" -:,; '~ ~~~ 49 au, C ./-1. d~ 'Ji ~)2- ~ -: ~60. 75 , -/ -t=- I ..; :ll ... ..; .., N ........ ....... .- ............. ............,. L<l1 SO TI : ~ '33 1501.6 :-- 14.37 _ _ 647.2 _ _ __ 1(141 ...... ~ 'f' 'I . . - . " . -. . ......... ,t I .:.- {..:: : " . . . If'" C!/ft 00(0) l1A-) Q PART Of' o LOT 3 := ~ ... o lI'i .... :! '; .,; ~ ~~LQ) ( ~ I;: c. TRACT A ( 68) ~ .--..... I ..;............}' I :.............2<0.62 ~. --~ ~ ---.~------. , :""10 I \ ....i.~..=..~.~.'.....T. ::::..12 B - I :;;) L!. ~'_ : (4~'r: ::. I I . I , r r (40) " '-. ~5,7: =: ~7 - 'o.....,J ~~uu@ 'i~,!,~~~,<: 12 (33) ~UfJfP) ^~ r,c Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Johnson - Site Plan Review & C.O. I:JJ tCHO I - ,!~ g 'tl 11 o < 10 S 10 :] rT f/l C. o ::J o rT Ul ~ \Q :] ~ .,.,. .... o III .,. ::J ,., I-' "< e- rT 10 11 , u c: )-- [:; V-J o .." lTJ lTJ -l \ )~~ -....,I' C ",.. . ~ ~ .~ "":I ~ ~ ~ ,., co,,; ::J U ~2. . n'''' [3 " " '" ~ ~c:: r; 2- V>~ E 3 n ,~ o Co ~ -. ...... -'"' 5' 0 :> .... ~~ !-' ~ 1;;' o' :> ., ::J c:. ~ E' '3 o 'r; :; ';:.!. C 'I-=: ',J " :; ::j" "~l Vl ',' ro t.? n o /. ..- rn '/. -J o /. VI I r)' r, ~J h '/. ,,' 3 '7 ~ LD N '" VI ~ " ~ 0: i/,' ~=l IT .~ ~ ~. ~,j .~ Ii r-:- ;s ~ ~.~~ 1>. - I; -" :-i' ,: =:'.. .~ :.r . ~j. ;~ .. :! ~t ~ c.. !' ..., -- </I J~m :) fn ~:~ =:: ~} () -' I ~..' I . t:: ;1: :-~ .~:. g ;. 0 t=i 5' {/l I" ~ g, ~ ~~ :. ? .., _ ~:::J '-:. ~. 8 1] ~ ~ r;;' :;;t]~f:l (.0_r~n:'1 " -. r.. '" r;: ~ ~ ~ Z ~. ~i ;~. r- ='" -, .. ~~~;~~; _:J n. ,.., t:J () ~ g C ~ ;'''"'2. ." :; ';(I Co: tJ g t.:' 0 ~ r) ET~;.~g -rn-;:1 ~ 2.::- :;.~ ~ I)~. c_ ~ ~'g R 5" ~~a;H o~~Q~ ;=,c:;;'P (~. g b a' ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ i;:~:;~: ~ ~,'" "~\ I ' J/<?I"1.....v".", '. ..." ., \";'l/~:/~).,~..J ~ , . '9 \'~_,_ " rp> .......!n4. G) s:-': '" c ;;;' ,., ;. (JQ ~ ~ !:. ::J " <n. n "'" . a' ~ " ~. ~ ~ - n ::r: >- ~ o )> ~f"J g< ~trJ ...~ Z_ '~z ~ ",0 Q .~ Vl '0 Z , ~ ~ .. '. .. . ;\ ;', ,; ,: t~; ~~. ,~ 0. .. .. :; :1 ,': ~'j . r)~ :~ ~i ~. ~~'I ~:1 :.r: --, b "J (;. :;. ~~ 'n .,;.~. T~~ () -. rJ f".; ~ 0':-: ~ :l r:. (-,.-:; .~ p. !i. ::;' ?J ...: ;;;. () 3 :;' ~ ~ ,... '.. i)'::J ';: Q ~..... c: -. VI'" 9 ~ ~ :::: ~ ~~ ~ ~. .... o :c z C/) o .Z ;,;Xo gtI1 ~Z .!:!O ....- ~z -.JtrJ ~t1i ::0 "TI_. E.z EO tin ~9' -.J " ,~ g' ~~ ~ '-= '~ ~ :: ;.", ri -" .;, ~ ~ ~ ~ fi :J lU 0 ,~. K ~ i'j- Ff ...) -fl. ~ :., ~j :'I " g' B ') ,~! ~. ,1= j;' '.. ~ ~ Co . . ~ f} ~ s: ~ ., rr ~1. :H t.l :') A 0 '6 ~ 1J;::. ':;:l ,~ ~ ~ Q.. ~ !~ ~~ ;; ~ ~~ t,r r~ :..' ::J. ~ ~ ~: 'q i .~.",; n 'l1C;; r/ ;: ,- II :.1" (11(0 ~"'2 =. Cl C/) ~:::c: ~.!!. ;: I ~.l> ~ :f() ~ ,.: lJ1 , _~I'l>t ~..... 10:1'1 t- o :u OJ r:: z ., 9 ~ 10 t.l 0 ~ 0; -", a. / :~ ~") ,.. 'u ~ .-North lille OrUlI',,-,;; ';. , :z:' 'o~ r80 <DO cia, 1>-_ ", 1"1 . I .0 ~: \ I \ ,"~ :; . ~,.th ~o.t +- "~uJ~ u: ....J "...1 n' \ " ..,~ ...-' I ,.. soulherl'l O lIel WI\h I T'UI\I/ ._I...\lle ?nl'~ f.JQlJs (~ Su.. (h Rr.-^" 0 .... "'''1:::,/ , .,.,; ~ , '. -' III ," ~ 'j .1 ,p .J .... C '.J .D " )f .... ... .... Z. a, ... . ~ OJ '0 .., c i -l lJl '" -, C 0" ~ ." ~ 0>.. J .... . .,' .. .. '!l t/I /- '" :G '" ';,0 (j)C ,,0 oJ ClITl ~ '" -i / S~ () rVl III ~j :zz ... ... / Ii) Ii) '" . ul <0. 'J '" ~ r j o- j ~~ - '0 ~ III oJ UI .g,rl ) 'u 0'", .... '" " , , " I I , , I , I'. I ) ," ," u"'" 1/ ~>,'l' ..V ,w,_ 1JI ~ =i ;rJ C 'Tl s: ~Z III g u' " ,,~':'I:II',,_ , "/;,:;"""""/" :a;, , <- ~ .J ,I I 1:1 ~ ---_._~ ~~;:.rTi:'~JI,~~7:."';,.~::~'l'j'":~~_'r~-:;':.~~:,\Y"~~r,,'~~i~~~imj Exhibit B PROPOSED SITE PLAN o. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWQOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 4 February 1992 RE: Floors of Minnetonka - Sign Permit FILE NO.: 405 (Sign Permits) In conjunction with his request to use the property at 5660 County Road 19 as a retail carpet store, Mr. Richard Johnson requests approval of a sign permit for signage as illustrated on Exhibit A, attached. Mr. Johnson proposes three signs which total 70 square feet in area. . 1. Pylon sign (on existing light standard) 2. Roof sign 3. Window sign Total - 3' x 5' - 1.5' x 20' - 5' x 5' = 15 sq. ft. = 30 sq. ft. = 25 sq. ft. 70 sq. ft. The number and area of signage is consistent with Zoning Ordinance requirements. The property is allowed three signs totaling 75 square feet. However, the Code prohibits roof signs. As a result the applicant proposes to lower the sign on the building to the mansard portion of the front wall. It is recommended that the sign permit be approved subject to the following: a. Change the roof sign to a wall sign. b. Provide staff with a design for the pylon sign. The Building Official must approve use of the light pole as a support for the sign. c. Provide staff with a design for the window sign. Advertisement shall not exceed 25% of the total allowable sign area (19 square feet). cc: Jim Hurm Richard Johnson !of} A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 't '. \.-.. ~ ~ \...: ~ ~ .... ~ \0... Qf ~ ~~~ '^ r-- ~"" \r. (""\ - ~ a . : t'- \~ .. . . ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V\ -.sa ..... 2 v. ..!) ~ ~ ~ c. "" -Q ~ ~ .... - ~ ~~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ -..a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ K ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ '"t ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ \"1 \a ~ ~ \J) ....... \J' ~ ~ ~ l( ':"0 ~ ~ -~ .-- ~ ..J. lIS""\ e .- 0.."" ,~ l... <d f. } v~ ') Q cJ ~1'"' c ~ C\j 4"\ .- ~ '" ~ \ ~~ ~" ~~ ,~ \~ .. ~~ " , """ .~ 't'(~ c--. l~ \~ \1 ~ ~' Q ~~~ \..., ~ .. &~~ ~ ~...: '-4"'4 ~ ~ ~ lc& ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ g "'" u.. \...... ~ ~ 'oJ -.s ~ ~~~ " ~ ~ - ~ ...<::> <'.... ~ ~ '::t ~ ~ ~~~"t" ~ <? \- ~ ~ ~ ~ "..i \0... ...., >< <::! ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ l.J. ~}-.. , I\.. ~ I~ \.. ~ ~ ""' ~ ~~~,,~ ""~\.(l::::l -Q ...a . . t ~ .. '^ \on l.n - ... \ ( \0 X .. 1"'\ .. '" ---+ ( toe - ~ ,.... < ~"'h', b., t A .. _ CITY OF SHOREWOOD MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 31 January 1992 RE: Gideon's Cove P.U.D. - Development Stage Plans FILE NO.: 405 (91. 05) BACKGROUND . In September of last year, pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council approved a Concept Plan for the Gideon's Cove P.U.D., including six, two-family dwellings (12 units) (see Exhibits A and B, attached). Subsequently, after considerable discussion, the Council denied the applicant's request to expand dock rights beyond ,what currently exists (i.e. there are two docks available for two of the lots). The developer has now submitted development stage plans.consisting of the following: Exhibit C - Preliminary Plat Exhibit D - Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit E - Preliminary Utility. Plan Exhibit F - Preliminary Architectural Plans Exhibit G - Typical Landscape Plan Exhibit H - Applicant's Request Letter 1-7-92 Exhibit I - Applicant's Request Letter 1-21-92 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Concept Plan approval for this project included a number of conditions which were to be addressed in the Development Stage review. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 7 A. Building Setbacks. Consistent with Concept Plan approval, the buildings have all been located at least 20 feet from the street right-of-way. Also, with one exception, side yards have been adjusted so that there is 20 feet between structures. Some adjustment must be made in the final plat to separate unit 11 from unit 10 to 20 feet. B. Preservation of Trees. The preliminary plat (Exhibit C) includes an inventory of trees over five inches in diameter. The inventory identifies approximately 50 trees to be saved and another 15 to be transplanted. It is recommended that these trees be marked and inspected by staff prior to any grading work. The applicant's grading plan should be modified to include placement of snow fence at the driplines of trees to be saved. Construction limits should also be staked prior to start of any work. The developer should consider shifting units 7 and 8 to the west to stay further away from the several trees east of that building. . It is worth noting that the developer has already modified his plat somewhat as a result of the tree inventory. C. Dock Rights. As explained in his second letter (Exhibit I) the two existing docks located on the peninsula will be assigned to two of the new units. They request that those rights be allowed to be assigned to two of the mQre expensive units on the westerly end of the project. According to the applicant this will allow them to keep prices down on the easterly units. . It is recommended that the protective covenants for the P.U.D./include provisions to prohibit parking on the peninsula. Further, based on neighborhood concerns, the City should post "no parking" signs along Timber Lane~between La\\,tonka Drive and the easterly side of Lot 9, Timber Lane Addition. ' D. Grading. Drainage and Utilities. The City Engineer addresses these items in Exhibit J. Apparently the developer proposes. to move the preexisting sewer line which crosses thiough units 5 and 6-(see Exhibit E). This may require a hearing to vacate any previous underlying easements. E.. Park Dedication Fees.) The original Lawtonka plat paid fees for six units (credit was given for the existing home). The proposed P.U.D. must pay five additional park dedication fees for five additional units. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Development Stage plans be approved subject to the following: 1. Provide 20 feet of space between units 10 and 11. - 2 - . . 2. Mark trees to be saved and traIlsplanted for inspection by City Staff. 3. Trees to be saved should be protected with snow fencing. 4. Construction limits should be staked to preserve the trees at the perimeter of the project. 5. Consider shifting units 7 and 8 to the west to protect trees. 6. The City should prohibit parking on Timber Lane between Lawtonka Drive and Lot 9, Timber Lane Addition. 7. Parking should be prohibited on the peninsula portion of the site. 8. Grading, drainage and utilities are subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer. 9. The applicant must pay park dedication fees for five units prior to release of the final plat. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Dave Sellergren Joel Dresel Bob Boyer - 3 - . North 111 = 200' I I I I I I I I I (5) Su~ject Site I (33) ~~~ I I I A~~ .... 140 : ....,........~........ 1.0 Of: LOT 292....... ( : (8) I I I ............ I ... ..... .~_...._- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -~. I I I I I I I nAIL\IIAY H '" !::: 6 ( 36) 1~ :?:! '" ..; ~ ~ e 2 ~ ( . ... ~ 48) ~ ~ !(1'9.Q&' r~.€. ~ ~ 152.45 s~I-e~~ - ':)l 11& - 11& - 12\.17 II iMI il' IlI1 - (.~ lr\I ~ 'if(Q) ~ ~~ ~ (2~) ~ (I~) o L B \49.24 ~ lIE~T 5 (22) ~ 12 (33) 160 ZE Exhibit A S~TE LOCATION GIdeon's Co P ve .U.D. ~'I ~s :.0 ...... 0\ Z ~. <C....... ~ (!) p.,CI) f-;' ~p.,13 .......u.J;::. :.cUo ..... z ~ ~o u.JU<C .: .<>:':1) . . ......'1. ".1... '- --J I . \ L" I "- '. ,'N -\ \ I en :r- >- l- n: W :1]- =Il a.. B\I ~ El~ trt O. 4: o 0: >- I- Z :J o o .. ~ 0- W Z Z ill :c z ~ -I 0.. LIJ I- - ~ """'Y' . . H38WI.L --- :l\ cO. "'~cO ~~~~ <il1lI.. U"'''' tr'- 011' n ~j~ I~l j I .,. .,. oj .... <1' -"'- t '" .~ ;: J / r- Ib ..; ., '" " ~ <\' . !!J ". .s :'\ .. '" .. '" '" . <iI'" U~ (IloJl C'" .0 .. ~ " Il..,; ~s. Ii c o (J w > o o /.. / x ~. '" " ::t t .~ <: ?" cf ;; ~o... ~ <1' ; ~ t .~ <: ~Q. "- z o w c - G '" <v 11). :'l </.' {f ,~ <'( ~ <;{ " ~ ~ [J f} .f . ! "-f ltl ~ ll\~ ou ..'oJ (i~.; ..~ ~. ~, ~ \- o / ~J! rot .., .... ,.- 0 '" I- W W "- I 0 <@- OD ;; 0 '" - -'V (6~ I 6/. W 0-1~...t.. -' r--. 1< IU 0 <1 . . E-< ~~ .....:l..... p.. 5 >- 6 p::; ..... ~ ~ u-.b ~ Vl .~ I-l 0 .o.....:l'"O ..... ~ ::l t;1p::;o ~p..~ h U1 ~ Q ..". ::> III ~. 0 ~ Q ~ "<;- ~ ~ II) I 1 , "' ~- a- oil <Xl ~!!.l~ .Qll\1' UIO'" er.... 0),. II E::r~ "lJ> ZoO -.. (f I V- V- a) '" '" :t t f' i: o ~' II). N '" <'l .... ',:-, i "'\"":;I~'":.':- .IF ] - Q r] td w c1 uI ' 2rJ I 'rJ ) > 11.>. g ~ ~ ~ ~~ O~JI F: cJl I .J r Z ~ I-- ~iJ ~ ~ oJ t 8 811.10 ~ ~ i ~ t 80 cIlO~~~~ i5gti uJi/l8c11'j rri \!TulffO.( J 0 OJ '" "2 (I Z I!.l 0.0 0 0 J ~ ~~!! ~ I, -a-Ill 9 ')/ f ~ 0 ~ R ~o. ~ d 1 1 ~ -i - 0 - (() 4. g> ~.~ ~ . ~ 2 ~ g ~ ~ ~~ 3 3 \l o ~ ,l'1. <- W ~~ 19" W \' ,. .. J i ~~ II II II I", III II 8J~~(IDoOj 1 II II ) I ~'; (f .J~u. It II q, II 'V II 11)' ,;r! Q..~ J t2E. g J (J ------ I I I I \/ I I I I I I ... . . z -< t-...l p.., f.LJ o <C Z ~ <C ~ Q ~ <: o z H Q <C ~ o >< ~ i Q~ ....~ :B::J .;::::: f.LJ ~~ f.LJp.., ~. fl' J{l ~. .. r::11 ~ ~-2J) . ~ / / ;/ I / J / / :1 / ;' I I / \) / I I / I 1\ Il.v / ) /<:/ ) I I ~ I I 'V / / J I / j / / I . I / ) / / j / ) I / 'J. / I ) I I jJ I I / J I :; I;' I J / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I fJl . J I I I I t g i,J, 't<'l uJ ~ a. -ZcJ1 III ll- o J-1ll0 CJWW ~rJ ~/J i7<t 4. uI I- <f)udl J:;10 ti~uJ ~lilUl~ o tJ1 [1 ~ t~ j ~ o~J.tL Ow 1.~) <( (f) dl ,{ uJ ~ o z If --,-' I I I 0 I I I -_L__ ,t:J ,.vi: -0 -I I I I r 'I I I I -_-1- Exhibit E PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN -n . . :z o H I< ( > t.I .l t.I ~ ( t.I ~ I< H :z ~ :z ,. H I< ( > t.I .. t.I I< :z o ~ ~ Exhibit F-l PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ==:l o:r-t "'.ZI I -at .,., ~ "'-'i,1 ~J~l! I .. ... . .... ~~ -Ili . z:1l '5 '" :1 o! :z < ~ 0- ~; ~ < 0 0 ~ ~ H .) r. :z .;, ~ ... ~ 111 "' ~ , H , r. ~- ! ~ I i ~ 1 . :j l t.. I I I I I I I Lr ~ 3 C S 0 .~ o g- U b.O C \Y)~ I Exhibit F-2 Ii -0- - - - - ~ --0 ~ I ~ I a- Il I 9 I I 2: <( I oJ ~ I ~ d 0 0 oJ I r.. <( 0 I oJ ~ 101 H [] I > Z 101 ~ oJ I ~ I 101 3 I 0 oJ ___-0 II _~ II . ,. - , - . ExhibitF-3 . -lEE ~ . l \ EB z o H ~ ( ( > r.l ~ ..l H r.l Z ~ r.l o H III c o "+=1 ~ o .e. o u OJ) c =-0 ~ Exhibit F-4 . . ir tffJ " I< H ~ :> ~ Ll Ll ~ I< ( Ll m I< H ~ ~ o :> H I< ( > Ll .l Ll I ~ \ \ \ Exhibit F-5 , . .j 1 ,\ \ 't. . , t 'S: } . .... . . ...,- ~d\ .w ..~I- .. .... LL=-~ ~-- ,\ . '" ): \- '-' )- .l- -, ~ 'J\ -1 ., i ~ :J l' t- ,) -..--------........., l' t t~ \- t-~ .~ .. \ f ~ :1 J. \--" J .~ ~ ~- , Ilo \ -,,:r Cl ::l "'J ....~t ">- l "J ] \7: ~ .\ i "l ~\- ~~\~4 , .. ~ Building Corporation 18283A Minnetonka Boulevard. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 · (612) 475-2097 January 7, 1992 City Cormcil Members CityofShorewood 5755 Cormtry Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 . Dear City Co'lIDcil Members, The following is a staterrent of various issues required for the develo:EJreIlt stage plan. I have arranged the information according to subject matter. 1. Architectural: Plans have beensul:mitted including floor plans and elevations. Scale is 1/8 inch equals 1 foot. A. Floor Plans - The overall square footage of the ground cover area is 1929 square f~t for unit A and 1964 square feet for Unit B. The finished square footage of the hares are 1529 square feet for Unit A and 1564 square feet for unit B. . Unit 9 on the north side of the cul-de-sac will require sate rcodi.fication to acccm:>date the lot size and set back requirercents. B. Exterior Design - The overall height of the hares in the developrent will be 21 feet 3 inches. The hares' were designed as one story hares with the principal living on one level and optional space in the lower level. Handicap access will be designed in rrost of the hares. The hares were designed to fit in tastefully with the existing ccmmmity. The exteriors will I:e New England Colonial with semi t.ransPClJElt ~ shingle siding. Solid color cedar co:rner boards and trim will be used. The entry sign will also reflect the sane architectural theIre, using the Gideon COVe logo and the SanE materials used on the exterior of the hares. Exhibit H-1 APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER Dated 7 January 1992 2. Festricti ve Covenants: A canplete set of restrictive covenants are not required for developrent stage approval. HCMever, for the purpose of putting at ease many who have expressed concem aOOut the long tem nature of this develo;:ment, I have canpiled a set of guidelines that will be included as part of the restrictive covenants. . A. All playgrotmd equiJ;!t'EIlt, of any sort, will not be all~. B. All snow plowing , driveway repair, waste rerroval, grolIDds maintenance and exterior building maintenance will be contracted by the Association. c. All nares are to be owner occupied. Rental of hares on a regular or seasonal basis will be prohibited. D. No storage of recreational vehicles will be allCMed outside of the harres. E. Any landscape or architectural m::x:lifications to the existing harres nmst be revi~ by a designated architectural ccmni ttee. That ccmnittee will have a set of guidelines with which to review each request. 3. Boat D:>ckage: It is our intent that the p:minsul.a be included as ccmron OPen space owned and maintained by the Association. It is also our intent that ~ allow dockage of boats on the J:eIrinsula but lirni t the dockage in such a way as not to exceed the present allowable density. The present allowable density by shoreline is 8 boats. '!he allowable density on the basis' of existing dockage is 6 boats. W: would propose the following: A., Censity be limited to a maxim.:nn of 5 boats. B. BOats are not to exceed 20" in length. c. S1ielters or covering, etc. be restricted. D. No additional watercraft be allowed. E. Fenoval of all existing buildings on the Peninsula. F. No off season storage of watercraft be allared on the peninsula. . I feel very strongly that Association ownership and maintenance of the Peninsula pmperty, as' ~ll. as' the dockage, is of pr:i.me importance for the success of this: .neighbbrhood. I also believe that Association owriership offers the City of Sho~ and the residents along Timber Lane the advantages of proper rronitoring of tlie Use of dockage and the rest of the peninsula and proper maintenance of the grounds. (2;;6 ~~ lbbert Boyer Boyer Buil . g Corporation Exhibit H-2 TJOf'II' Building Corporation 18283A Minnetonka Boulevard. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 . (612) 475-2097 January 21, 1992 City Council Members City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 J~Jl 2 1 lca? \ ,....i'-'- Dear City Council Members, . The following is a stateme t of various issues required for the development stage plan. T is is an addendum to the previous letter sent January 7, 199. Please accept this as clarification of detail requested. 1. Architectural: As ioned previously, preliminary architectural plans have been submit ed including floor plans, elevations and landscape plan for the court yard. A. Floor plans - the verall square footage of the ground cover is 1929 square feet f r Unit A and 1964 square feet for Unit B. The finished main evel square footage of the homes is 1529 square feet for Unit A and 1564 square feet for Unit B. Total surface area of driveways and sidewalks is approximately 10,681 square feet. . B. Exterior Design - 0 change from January 7 letter. C. Summary of hard surface areas - the total allowable land area is 170,160 square feet as stated earlier. This is not in- clusive of Outlot C and the Lawtonka Drive right of way. Dividing the total allowable square footage into the total hard cover surfaces, including driveways, sidewalks and home footprint results in 20 or 20 percent. 2 . Restrictive Covenants: no change from January 7 letter. 3. Boat Dockage: It is common open space, ow also our intent to pr with what presently e by the individual horn become the property 0 ur intent that the peninsula be included as ed and maintained by the Association. It is vide two private dockage rights in keeping ists. Dockage facilities would be maintained owners. Existing buildings would remain and the Association. Exhibit I-I APPLICANT'S REOUEST LETTER Dated 21 January 1992 1 . . 4. Tree inventory: been adjusted to Removal of trees being replanted. The site topography and building elevations have accomodate the existing vegetation on the site. will be kept to a minimum with some suitable trees A complete inventory of trees, 5" in diameter or larger, has been prepared. Note the trees that will remain and the trees that will be removed have been color coded. Trees suitable for replanting have been marked as well. All replacement trees will corne fron on site stock, thus preserving the indiginous nature of the development. Replacement trees will be determined by general physical appearance (straightness, branching, etc.) and vitality (soundness and ability to withstand the stress of transplanting). Respectfully, ~b" Robert Boyer Boyer Buildi Corporation Exhibit 1-2 2 · JAN 31 '92 14:0~ OSM MPLS, MN P.l OSMorr Sdlelen Mayeron & ASSociates,lnc. 2Q21 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis. MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors January 31, 1992 Mr. Brad Nielsen City of Shorewood 5755 Country Oub Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Gideon Cove Shorewood, MN OSM Comm. No. 4590.00 . Dear Mr. Nielsen: We have reviewed the preliminary plat, preliminary grading and drainage plan, and the preliminary utility plan of Gideon Cove for compliance with the City of Shorewood development standards and have the following comments: preliminaay Gradinll And Drain8&e Plan 1. The proposed slope in the rear yards of Lots 11 and 12 is shown as 2:1. This should be changed to show a maximum slope of 3:1. . 2. Additional erosion control barrier should be shown in the rear yards of Lots 11 and 12 to prevent erosion from entering the wooded area west of the project. The erosion control barrier should extend around the proposed embankment. 3. A permit will be required from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the proposed site grading. Preliminary Utility PI~n 1. The proposed Preliminary Utility Plan does not show sanitary sewer and watermain services. A note on the plan states that additional sanitary sewer service wyes shall be installed as required. In the past it has been the City of Shorewood's policy to require separate 4" sanitary sewer and r watermain services for each individual 2. The proposed Preliminary Utility Plan shows 6" DIP watermain extended north of HCSAH No. 19 or Timber Lane. The Comprehensive Water Study Update prepared in July of 1990 calls for an 8" line to be installed along Timber Lane in tbis area. An 8" line should also be considered along Lawtonka Drive. Exhibit J-1 CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT Dated 31 January 1992 Equal OpportunilY Employer , JRI'I 31 "92 14: 82 OSM MPLS, M/'J P.2 Mr. Brad Nielsen January 31, 1992 Page 2 3. An appropriate drainage and utility easement should be d,edicated adjacent to Lawtonka Drive to allow for future maintenance of the proposed watermain. 4. The existing 9" sanitary sewer proposed to be abandoned is a live line. This sanitary sewer line. will need to be kept in service. Preliminary Plft! . 1. The drainage and utility easement located between lots 8 and 9 should be 20 feet in width and centered on the existing sanitary sewer line. It was assumed that the City of Shorewood Planning Department would review the Gideon Cove Preliminary Plat for conformance with the zoning requirements. Therefore, the above comments do not include a review of this item. If you have any questions on the above information please contact me at 387-6370. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MA YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. .~e Joel A Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer JAD:BJB Ijet 0131cos.bn Exhibit J-2 MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob DaughertY Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council . FROM: Brad Nielsen DATE: 3 January 1992 RE: Norman, William - Zoning Text Amendment to Allow Single-Family Dwellings in the R -C District FILE NO.: 405 (91.21) BACKGROUND . In the early 1980's the property located at 24590 Glen Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) was rezoned from R-4, Multiple-Family Residential to R-C, Residential/Commercial. A conditional use permit wa~ issued to use the old Peter Gideon home as office space for Spectronix, Inc., an electroniC engineering consulting business. Mr. William Norman has sJ,lbsequentlypurchased the property and used it as offices for his business. He is moving to Arizona for three years after which he proposes to reSume use of the building as office space. In the meantime he wishes to rent the building out as a single- family home. The Zoning Ordinance as it is currently written does not allow single-family dwellings in the R-C District. Consequently, Mr. Norman has requested a zoning text amendment which would strike the single-family residential exception from the R-C provisions. It should be noted that the building is still set up as a single-family dwelling, despite having been used as offices by two companies. It should also be mentioned that the owner explored the possibility of converting the building to a two-family dwelling, which is allowed in the R-C District. He chooses, however, to not alter the building for that use. Also, since he desires to resume using the building as office space, he does not want to request a rezoning to a district which allows single-family residential. A Residential Community on Lake Mtnnetonka's South Shore Cd ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION A copy of the R-C District section of the City Code is attached for your review (Exhibit B). As stated in the purpose of that section, the district is intended as a transition between residential and commercial areas. In reviewing ordinances of other cities which use similar transitional zoning districts, some allow single-family residential use, others do not. As the applicant's request is reviewed it is useful to consider other sites in Shorewood which are currently zoned R-C. There are six: 1. 5580 County Road 19 - vacant parcel just east of the apartment building 2. 24000 State Highway 7 - office building 3. 6140 Lake Linden Drive - office building (previously single-family residential) 4. 6120 Lake Linden Drive - vacant lot north of 6140 5. 23505 County Road 19 - commercial n\lrsery with caretaker residence 6. 6000 Chaska Road - office building . It must be realized that any change in the R-C District applies to all of the existing sites, as well as properties rezoned R-C in the future. Based upon the applicant's request, it could be concluded that a single-family residence is an appropriate use in the R-C District. Analysis of the other R-C sites, however, suggests that some of them are simply not appropriate for single-family homes. For example, the site east of the apartments on County Road 19 and the Shorewood Nursery property are surrounded by uses other than single-family residential. What this suggests is that if the City feels it is appropriate for single-family homes to be. located in the R-C District in certain situations, then they may best be included under the conditional use section. Following is an example of how such an amendment might appear: "f. Single-family detached dwellings, provided that: . (1) The site abuts property which is zoned for single-family detached dwellings. (2) The building is designed as a single-family detached dwelling. (3) The building shall meet all applicable fire and building codes. II If the Planning Commission agrees with this approach, staff will prepare a formal ordinance amendment for the City Council. The applicant will then be directed to apply for a conditional use permit. cc: Jim Hurrn Dave Sellergren William Norman -2- SI9.~~ I ,",S"8'! 109. 16 (49) :rrv nF TN. I( 1::t4 A 1 f OF SHOREWOOO l. ... 1137.15 . 1001. 99 0 Su~""t " S.~ ( 12) ~ I Of lor 6 $ (22) 5 (21) 118.5 (4S) J !::: (9) ~ ..f)/"' ~l!JJID> ~l!JJ~ID> !m(Q) ~~ TRACT A (68) "ART rs lor '3 ~ / ( 49 ~ o /0.......;........., o ;..--....-- --no.62' :~ .__I~ 18? )6' :.. - ~ -- 0:; .; ~ / (~l 1<0 /-. -, .' . I ~ (48') ..--.--.......2:>>.6--------..... ...........H6.ge..... ~ ~ j1"'>b . . . ~ "" ~ .~... ---..~~_.:.... ':..12 1 ~10 I , . o : I I . . . - ..: 1 : I , , I "") I / ( '12.) } ,~ (40) 241.9\ ;:: .,.:~!:..:.:-:..::.- n.ll',' "lEll.6 15<.6 "II l~J 5l ", A) " "'" '\)~ ", ~ . '_"I /. \'/ "- ~::) 4,> (1 ~ ", '\ <.)'-../(" '. '...' r .... -':-, (.. .. . IE~UU(Q) f (32) ..f :; ~ /1.~',':' ~ ~ .' / /... ......... ......, J6 i ~ . o '6 ~ : ., :" _......_~ 1$ . .. 0 (IS) L......!!.u 75 ~~~ OO(Q) <7 ( 17) <e . , . ~ ~ l]uTlUr I 12 (33) '9 ::;h ..; ~ 4'.... ................... ........ ............, 14) ~ I .1 151.a ~ 74.J7 ~ ~. ~ &""~b,t (4)A 1201.19: R-C, RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: Subd. 1. Purpose: The R-C District is intended for a gradual transition between commercial. and residential uses. More specifically, the R-C District is established to buffer residential uses from adjacent high intensity use areas by permitting residentially compatible service-oriented commercial uses and controlling those uses which can be compatible with residential areas given adequate control. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses: The following are permitted uses in an R-C District: a. All. uses permitted in Residential Districts R-IA through R-2B, except single-family residential dwellings. Subd. 3. Permitted Accessory Uses: The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-C District: . a. All accessory uses allowed in the R-2B District. 1091 . ~".,b,1 b. 1201.19 1201.19 b. Parking and loading facilities subject to the provisions of Section 201.03, subdivision 5 and subdivision 6 of this Ordinance. c. Signs, as regulated in Section 1201.03, subdivision 11 of this Ordinance. Subd. 4. Conditional Uses: The following are conditional uses allowed in an R-C District: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1201.04 of this Ordinance.) a. All conditional permitted uses, subject to the same conditions as allowed in the R-2B District. . b. Conservatories, art or music studios, nurseries, and nurseries with garden supply centers, provided that: (1) Adequate off-street parking shall be provided in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 5g of this Ordinance. (2) Vehicular access shall create a minimum of traffic conflicts. (3) The use shall not have a predominant retail character. (4) The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (5) When abutting an R-IA through R-2C Residential District, a buffer area with screening and landscaping as provided in Section 1201.03, subdivision 2g of this Ordinance. c. Professional and business offices, medical and dental offices, provided that: (1) Adequate off-street parking shall be provided in compliance with Section 1201.03, subdivision 5 of this Ordinance. (2) Vehicular access shall create a minimum of traffic conflict. (3) The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. (4) When abutting an R-1A through R-2C Residential District, a buffer area with screening and landscaping as provided in Section 1201.03, subdivision 2g of this Ordinance. (Ord. 180, 5-19-86) d. Resi.dential or commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 1201.06 of this Ordinance, provided that: (1) Land uses allowed in a planned unit development are limited to those land uses listed as permitted uses, permitted accessory uses and conditional uses in this Section. . 1091 6z, (2) The proposed development complies with the development agreement as required for planned unit developments. pursuant to Section 1201.25 of this Ordinance. (Ord. 208, 4-11-88) e. Nursing homes as defined in Section 1201.02 of this Ordinance, provided that: (1) Side yards are double the minimum requirements established for this District and are screened in compliance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 2g of this Code. (2) The site shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic which will be generated. (3) All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 11 of this Code. 1201.19 1201.19 .---- i \ -' 1 . (4) All State laws and statutes governing such use are strictly adhered to and all required permits are secured. (5) Adequate off-street parking is provided in compliance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 5 of this Code. (6) One off-street loading space in compliance with Section 1201.03 Subd. 6 of this Code is provided. (7) The provisions of Section 1201.04 Subd. 4d(1) of this Code have been considered and satisfactorily met. (Ord. 243, 9-9-91) Subd. 5. Lot Requirements and Setbacks: The following IIllIUIllum requirements shall be observed in an R-C District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance: a. Lot area: (1) Two-family dwelling (2) All other b. Lot width c. Lot depth d. Setbacks: (1) Front yard (2) Rear yard (3) Side yard (4) Nonresidential use setback from R District boundary (5) Lakeshore Subd. 6. Building Requirements: 1091 ~, . Not less than 20,000 square feet Not less than 15,000 square feet Not less than 100 feet Not less than 120 feet Not less than 35 feet Not less than 40 feet Not less than 15 feet on each side nor less than' 35 feet on a side yard abutting a street Not less than 25 feet Not less than 100 feet 1201.19 1201.19 a. Height: No structure shall exceed two and one-half (21/,;) stories, or thirty five feet (35'), whichever is least Subd. 7. Lot Area Per Unit Requirement: Not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet Subd. 8. Special District Provisions: a. Where a conditional use abuts an R-1A through R-2C District, buffer fences and/or planting screens shall be installed by the conditional use pemrit recipient according to provisions of Section 1201.03, subdivision 2g of this Ordinance should the Council determine that a need for a buffer exists. b. Special use commercial activities shall be allowed to operate only between the hours of eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. and nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. in the R-C District. . c. All noise levels generated by activities in the R-C District must ,conform to State standards. d. Signs shall comply with the requirements under Section 1201.03, subdivision 11 of this Ordinance, as well as the following additional nrovisions: 1201.19 1201.20 .. (1) Business signs shall be limited to a total surface area of thirty six (36) square feet per each building or individual business use. Not more than two (2) individual signs may be displayed per each principal use. (2) Illuminated signs shall not be permitted in the R-C District. (3) Freestanding signs not exceeding -twenty (20) square feet and not higher than five feet (5') shall be permitted in the R-C District. e. Storage - Displays: With the exception of nursery stock, all materials, supplies, merchandise or other similar matter not on display for direct sale, rental or lease to the ultimate consumer or user shall be stored within a completely enclosed building within the R-C District, or within the confines of one hundred percent (100%) opaque wallar fence not less than five feet (5') high. f. The City Council or its designated representative shall evaluate the design elements of the conditional uses under the provisions of Section 1201.04 of this Ordinance. ~~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SETBACK VARIANCE AND VARIANCE TO EXPAND A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO RICHARD AND DEBORAH KOWALSKY WHEREAS, Richard and Deborah Kowalsky (Applicants) are the owners of real property located at 5740 Christmas Lake Point in the City of Shorewood, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as: "Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 407" and . WHEREAS, the Applicants have an existing single-family dwelling on the property, which dwelling constitutes a nonconforming structure because it is located entirely within the required 75-foot setback from Christmas Lake; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for a variance to structurally alter the lower level to increase the habitable space in the home; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have requested a setback variance to enclose the area beneath their existing deck for use as a two-car garage; and WHEREAS, the Applicants' request was reviewed by the City Planner, and his recommendations were duly set forth in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 2 January 1992 which memorandum is on file at City Hall; and . WHEREAS, after required notice, a public hearing was held and the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on 7 January 1992, the minutes of which meeting are on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Applicants' request for a variance was considered by the City Council at their regular meeting on 13 January 1992 at which time the Planner's memorandum and the minutes of the Planning Commission were reviewed and comments were heard by the Council from the City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the Subject Property is located in an R-lA single-family residential. . zoning district and is also subject to therequiremepts of the "S" Shoreland (overlay) DIstnct. 9 2. That the site is unique in that required setbacks on the property result in a virtually unusable buildable area, less than 10 feet in depth. 3. That due to setback requirements, nothing could be built on the property without a variance. 4. That the easterly side of the site is characterized by severe topography. 5. That the proposed structural alteration and garage enclosure is contained within the "footprint" of the existing structure. 6. That the proposed construction would constitute a reasonable use of the land and will improve the livability of the home without increasing its nonconformity. 7. That the Applicants have planted shrubbery along the west side of the proposed garage to break up' the building mass. . 8. That the Applicants have established undue hardship and have satisfied the criteria for the grant of a variance under the appropriate sections of Minnesota Statutes and the Shorewood City Code. CONCLUSIONS 1. That based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby grants the Applicants' request for a setback variance to build a two-car garage and a variance to alter the nonconforming structure within the confines of the existing house. 2. That the City Administrator/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide a certified copy of this resolution for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar . of Titles. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 10th day of February, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator/Clerk . . RESOLUTION NO. -92 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A REVISION TO THE CITY'S SEWER ACCESS CHARGE WHEREAS, the City Council has directed Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Associates, Inc., consulting engineers, to complete a report for an update to the City's sewer equalization rate; and WHEREAS, such work is to be completed on an hourly basis, not to exceed $500.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the design agreement (attached) for said services is hereby approved and authorized to be executed by the City Administrator. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the city of Shorewood, Minnesota this 10th day of February, 1992. Barbara J. Brancel ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator -. It) DESIGN AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between the City of Shorewood and Or-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., pursuant to the terms in their Contract for Consulting Engineering Services. project Description: Provide technical report for an update to the City's sewer equalization rate. Scope of Services: 1) Provide technical basis for updated sewer access charge. compensation: Hourly basis with a maximum of $500.00. Deliverables: Report to the Financial Director for inclusion in a recommendation report prepared by that office. Signed: Edward J. DeLaForest, P.E. Vice President Signed: James C. Hurm City Administrator . . RESOLUTION - 92 RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD A RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINDING OF PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR CHURCH ROAD WHEREAS, WHEREAS, . WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, . WHEREAS, a roadway I commonly known as Church Road, located within the City of Shorewood has bean used by the general public as a thoroughfare; and, Church Road is unpaved and is in need of upqradin9; and a majority of property owners along Church Road 'petitioned for upgrading of the street; and it is cost-effective to install a watermain with services at the same time as road improvements, and the City of Shorewood directed the preparation of and received a feasibility study to upgrade and improve the Church Road roadway and install watermai~ and services held a public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429 ~t ~eQ., to consider ordering improvements to Church Road; and, pursuant to Resolutions numbered 5-91, 70-91, and 72-91 the Shorewood City Council authorized the construction of the Church Road improvements; and the City Engineer has determined the need for additional right-ot-way to construct the necessary improvements; and the City Council of the City of Shorewood has determined that the improvements and need for additional right-of-way are in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Shorewood, that the City acquire the right, title and interest in certain property generally described as portions of Lots 5 through 22 and Lot 38, Minnewashta, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as and to the extent necessary pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 117 et seQ. for the public purpose of constructing the improvements to Church Road. WHEREAS, - , \ Passed and adopted by the Shorewood City Council this day of February, 1992. Barbara Brancal AT'rESTz Jamee Hurm, City Clerk-Administrator . . DCS:HL4sg 2. Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 r;:b t"j -c.. January 28, 1992 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Lance and Rita Detrude 26620 62nd Street West Shorewood, MN 55331 PROJECT fILE Re: Street Construction on Church Road OSM Project No. 4680.20 . Dear Mr. and Mrs. Detrude: As we discussed, the residents along Church Road and the Shorewood City Council are anxious to resolve the legal matters of this project so that construction can be done this coming summer. As we are in verbal agreement with the rest of the residents involved, but can't seem to come to an agreement with yourselves, we would like to meet with you personally to see if a mutual agreement can't be reached. We understand that you have a very busy schedule, and we will make every effort to meet at a time that is convenient for you. You should be aware that the time-line on this project is getting very tight. If we can't reach an agreement by the February 10, 1992 Council Meeting, we will be forced to start condemnation proceedings for this sun:uner's construction. Obviously, we are doing everything possible to avoid such proceedings. . You can contact me at 378-6370 or the City Administrator, Mr. James Hurm, at 474-3236. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES NC. # Joel Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer /cmw o 128lrd c: Mr. Brad Neilsen, City Planner Mr. James Hurm, City Administrator Equal Opportunity Employer DEe 3 0 1991 !!t~~ 'SERflIe$/Nf::if: ~ 1*"...~t~lf;~~~~~~~'~i~.~i'ri.S~d#;'>"~~}*~~' ~~,,~~~~~,:-Ji,;~..; ,;;C, l'~" '" :~,~~,>:#t~'~,.T- "0.:',,;..1 ~ '" ~::.tf1i;;~J1~~~~~< December 26, 1991 Mr. Jim Hurm City Manager City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 FILE COpy Dear Mr. Hurm, . This letter will summarize our meeting of Tuesday, December 17, 1991, in which we outlined the difficulties that are being encountered in the recycling industry. Before outlining our concerns, drawing an analogy may assist in developing the proper perspective of the situation. A person develops a hang nail.... the hang nail develops an infection...... the infection progresses to gangrene.... the finger needs to be amputated. When does a person seek medical attention? When viewed in hindsight, it is easy to say one should have sought medical attention at the hang nail stage. However, in actuality, one expects a hang nail to "mend" its self with proper care. A prudent person would certainly take precautionary medical actions once an infection became apparent and not allow more severe repercussions. The recycling industry is faced with a comparable situation. For months it has had a "hang nail". Knutson Services recognized and felt the pain of the industry's problems. We provided proper care and treatment, but like the hang nail, through no personal fault, the situation has worsened and an infection is developing. Before the problem becomes critical (gangrene or amputation) we are making you aware of that situation. . In our briefing, we indicated that the recycling concerns fell into four areas: cost of collections, markets, processing requirements, and our ULSM revenue sharing. With the Cities that have a drop off collection iaciiity, thai: particuiai compofleni snouid oe aadeo. tSelow, pieas~ tlnd a more detaiied outline of these. COST OF COLLECTION The cost of recycling collection is continually escalating. This is factored by ever increasing program participation with ever larger product tonnages. Current weekly participation hovers at a rates of 66% (with those recycling at least once per month closer to the 90 percentile). This is nearly double of previous rates. More families are not only participating but they are recycling more. They are doing a more thorough job of recycling (Le. recycling ill the glass they generate) combined with the ability to recycle additional products. To Knutson Services, this has meant significant transportation/labor expense. The addition of three truck days per week combined with a continual increased cost of transportation (based on the Consumer Price Index) have created dangerously low margins. ... SOLID WASTE RECYCLING SYSTEMS · STREET SWEEPING Since 1961 Printed on recycled paper (1v--1 MARKETS The markets and their requirement (as described in the ensuing section) have created highest level of concern. In the past months and seemingly at an ever quickening rate, the value of the product is declining. This perhaps can be best shown by utilizing unsorted plastics as an example- its value declining from a positive $.03/lbs. to $.OO/Ibs. to a negative $.03/lbs. to a negative $.06/lbs. Its severity is put in perspective when one realizes the cost of garbage disposal at Pine Bend Landfill is $.03/lbs.! This trend has been experienced in each of the designated recycling products (fortunately, not to the extent of the plastic market). PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS . While the value returned for recyclables has declined, the requirements for market acceptance has skyrocketed (unrealistically restrictive). Knutson Services has always been recognized as delivering a high quality of pure materials to our market vendors and we were assured of their material purchase. It is now necessary to do additional sorting just to secure market delivery. An example of this is glass. Roll off loads (notice the plural) of up to 7 tons each have been rejected due to the contamination by just 7 pieces of ceramics or due to the inadvertant inclusion of a broken bottle of "Clearly Canadian" with the clear glass. No longer is our driver'::; curbside sort an acceptable process. Each material must be curbside collected and presorted, surged (bulk accumulations), inspected, sorted, packaged to their requirements (crushed, baled, granulated, etc.) stored pending the markets delivery/acceptance schedule , and then retransported. ULSM (unprocessed local spot market) REVENUE SHARING The previous areas of concern have, for the most part, been beyond our direct control. We must accept responsibility for the errors and precidents of this program. In essence, we have been basing the revenue sharing on a processed price rather than on a QLe.processed market value. The original intent of the program was to return 1/3 of the recyclables' value in a manner as if they were brought directly to redemption by the homeowner. . Knutson Services has been "rebating" full processed material value. We are not recommending review of the past 10 months payments, but will be making the corrections to the ensuing payments (November 1991, on forward). This adjustment will primarily effect your return for the mixed glass, mixed cans, and plastics. The ULSM is calculated monthly according to existing local market prices for unprocessed recyclable materials. An average is made of redemption values for each recycle type from three different vendors. This three part average is comprised of redemption values yielded from two sources which collect amounts of all recycle types (Le. drop-off buy back centers) while the third component is taken from type specific vendorc; (Le. mp.t~1 cans, gIRSS. plastics). DROP OFF REVeLING SITES Although drop off sites do not effect all the communities involved with our recycling collections, they need to be included as an area of concern and recognized as a source of expense. These mirror and surpass the concerns characterizing the curbside collection, among which are high utilization/increased product amounts, poor product quality due to garbage and nonrecyclable contamination levels causing significant processing and landfill cost, and relatively small product value return. Where do we go from here? Solid waste management has been described as "shooting at a moving target - difficult, but not impossible to hit!" It is known that the destiny of recycling efforts is controlled by the reuse of the recycled products. If recycling collection programs are in an . . infancy stage, product reuse would have to be considered in incubation. They must be allowed time and conditions to develop. During this maturing time period, it is imperative that you know of Knutson Services' commitment to your Community and its recycling endeavor. Although there are not any quick fix solutions readily apparent, we are prepared go through these difficult times by working together with a unified effort! It is our desire that we can have additional dialogue on this matter and explore the options available. Please contact me at your earliest convenience so that an itinerary and agenda can be arranged. By caring for recycling's "infected hang nail" now, we won't have to worry about more serious and drastic actions later! Respectfully submitted, -y\\ <'-> (\ . ~- Mark Heieren Sales Manager c::~ cc: Larry K. Knutson, President D.F. Wally Wall, General Manager - CFO I ;. G. ,,f ?~"..'. '.... .. ," f' '" U S WEST Direct A Division of . U S WEST Marketing Resources Group, Inc. 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway Post Office Box 29130 Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429 ll~~ST DIRECTW January 3, 1992 Association of Recycling Managers Members Twin City Metropolitan Area Dear ARM Member: The telephone directory recovery program for the Minneapolis area is ready to begin! This letter is to inform you of some of the details, in case you receive any queries about it. . The program will begin on January 14, and end on March 16, 1992. People will be able to bring their books to any of the 44 Newmarket and Super Valu Stores in the entire metropolitan area. Even though the majority of the delivery will take place in the western half of the metro area, we will include those stores in the eastern half as well. . Businesses may deliver their books directly to the warehouse: KWA Metals, Inc 1109 Zane Ave. North Golden Valley THEY SHOULD CALL FIRST: 545-8410 This is temporary space only, that we are renting on a short term basis. After March 15, people may bring their books to: Product Development Corporation 2816 North Second Street Minneapolis 521-0773 This information may be included in any community newsletters you may publish. If you include a telephone number for further information, that should be: 569-4000. Anyone at that number will be able to help them. Here is a little background about our programs. U S WEST Direct publishes telephone directories in nearly 300 . communities in 14 states. We have been recycling directories since August of 1990, and so far have conducted programs in over 80 communities. Publisher of The White & Yellow Pages (/;:;.' I .' (.;. JAN f FILE COpy ,: ,. ,. . CITY OF WAYZADt 600 RICE STREET. WAYZATA. ~HNN. 55391 PHONE 473-0234 January 16, 1992 Mark Heiren Knutson Services Inc. 15120 Chippendale Avenue Rosemont. Minnesota 55068 Dear Mark. . Thanks for meetincr with us on the morning of January 7, 1992 with regard to current market problems. It appears that two problems need immediate attention. Contamination of product and definition of the U.L.S.M. It was my understanding from that meeting that Knutson Services Inc.. will send us some specific information on how you feel we can address contamination before our next meeting on Jar.uary 28. 1992. . Problems with the U.L.S.M. seem to arise from definition. I cannot say that I am in agreement with the change Knutson implemented for Novembers U.L.S.M. Revenue Sharing. My understanding of the procedure for determining the U.L.S.M. is for Knutson Services to meet quarterly with the coordinators of L.M.R.G. (Lake Minnetonka Recycling Group) to determine what local spot markets would be used based upon the price that market was paying or charging at 9:00 AM Wednesday morning of that week. That seems to be the method we've used since contracts were implemented last January, 1991. If I understand the method used to calculate Novembers market price and revenue sharing, Knutson Services called three market outlets and used an average of those three. This does not comply with what I believe was the methodology we agree to use. If contamination of materials on the curbside route is a problem so that materials cannot be brought directly to market then it would be my concern if city crews were picking up materials. that they be very careful about separating at the curb and leaving inappropriate materials behind along with an education tag. I was under the impressions that the 1.70/HH/Month would allow the driver enough time to be careful about separating and leaving unusable materials behind. . . Page : January 16. 1992 The Knutson M.R.F., as I understand it, would give Knutson more latitude on how to handle materials and best utilize your staff. It should not have a bearing on the U.L.S.M. I hope these comments will help you understand some of my concerns. I look forward to our meeting on the 28th. If there are questions you have prlor to that time, please call me. Sincerely, Sonny Clark Recycling Coordinator Form No. A. F. 4 _ Notice to CIeri< of Meeting of Board of Review *EQualization. Poucher. Mpls. JAN i. 4 ..;;,~- . OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR TO THE CLERK OF THE City OF Shorewood NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the at Seven o'clock P. "Equalization-in your City Thirteenth day of May ; \ , I I i i i i , Hennepin COUNTY. MINNESOTA: M., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Review- (Strike out One) for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law. .pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.03, you are required to give notice of said meeting blication and posting, not later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting. Given under my hand this d2Jro\ day of ..Jo.\\l,\O,'-( ,19 q ~ ,!,TMA rJ.hn471 h · County Assessor Hennepin County, Minnesota *Applies only to Cities whose charter provides for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review. t3 D- 2 January, 1992 SHOREWOOD CITY VALUES The Shorewood City Council, in its governing roll, is responsible for setting policies for the City, which are implemented by the Administrator and City employees. Furthermore, the Administrator, employees, and City commissions propose overall goals, specific objectives, service levels, and action plans for Council consideration and direction. This "team" makes decisions and acts based on a strong set of values. The team values are: . A strong sense of commitment to the City and its statement of Purpose. . . Open, democratic government, enhanced by an informed populace. . Responsiveness to the needs and desires of the citizens; public service. . Fair and equal interpretation and enforcement of City Codes. . A reputation for dependability and integrity. . Teamwork and action oriented problem solving (acting rather than reacting) . . . Striving for improved productivity and efficiency through new technology and innovation. . Employee selection by merit. . Professional development. . Respect for City employees who, with fair treatment, proper training, and a willingness to let them excel, will take pride in association with the City and serve the people well. . The provision of accurate, timely information to the City Council, thru proper channels, so the best possible decisions can be made. . Adherence to professional, ethical standards of conduct. JCH.al 13 D- 3 . . ,IAN 3 1 1992 ) ~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 29, 1992 - HENNEPIN - Urban Hennepin County Cooperating Communities ~, Hennepin County Office of Planning & Developmen\ ~ YEAR XVIII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM - ~ The accompanying materials are provided to assist in the process of select- ing activities for funding from the Year XVIII (1992) Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program. 1. Program Development Schedule 2. Planning Allocation by Community 3. Statement of Objectives 4. Sample Notice of Public Hearing 5. Sample Resolution approving local use of funds 6. Request for Funds form The 1992 grant amount of $2,817,000 is a preliminary estimate. HUD doesn't think a final amount will be available for about a month or so. Any necessary adjustment in the planning allocation will be imparted as soon as possible. Please note that your public hearings should be held before March 30 and the -,--~,.._..,-. request for funding returned to the County by <~~~~? The 15 percent cap on funding for public services is applied to the annual grant amount plus program income received the previous year. Since the amount of program income from Year XVII will not be known until after June 30, 1992, communities should limit public service activities to 20 percent of their planning allocation, with the realization that adjustments may have to be made when the subrecipient agreement is executed. Should there be any questions, please contact your CD representative. <RI: tf Enclosures ... 13D-5 . . DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY PROGRAM YEAR XVIII STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS January 29, 1992 Year XVIII program development materials mailed to communities. March, 1992 Local public hearings. April 15, 1992 Requests for Funding due to Hennepin County. May 14, 1992* Hennepin County public hearing on Statement. May 19, 1992* Hennepin County Board authorizes submittal of State- ment to HUD. May 22, 1992 Subrecipient Agreements and Third Party Agreements sent to communities. June 1, 1992 Statement due to HUD. July 1, 1992 HUD authorization to implement the Year XVIII projects. July 10, 1992 Subrecipient Agreements duly signed by communities returned to Hennepin County for execution. Third Party Agreements executed and a copy returned to Hennepin County. July 31, 1992* Execution of Subrecipient Agreements between Henne- pin County and each community to permit disbursal of funds. * County Board action dates may vary. 1/28/92 UHCDEVEL.SCH PRELIMINARY PLANNING ALLOCATIONS YEAR XVIII (1992) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR XVIII Community ALLOCATION ------------~--- ---------- . Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Chanhassen Corcoran crystal Dayton Deephaven Eden prairie Edina Excelsior Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover Hassan Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford Rogers Shorewood Spring Park st. Anthony* st. Bonifacius st. Louis Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland 221,581 343,010 43,624 41,511 36,189 129,455 28,165 17,360 90,399 153,751 15,471 76,513 8,740 3,500 6,126 13,575 108,007 16,813 7,265 1,906 108,92~ 8,197 1,609 15,524 143,939 958 22,194 71,916 125,443 26,220 20,747 190,618 72,633 21,524 7,632 ~. 22, 779 10,852 28,571 8,184 235,268 5,770 19,020 3,816 . Total 2,535,300 Hennepin County Total Allocation 281,700 2,817,000 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES YEAR XVIII (1992) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM Community Development Block Grant funds may be used to support a wide range of housing and community development activities. The Statement of Objectives provides a framework for use by Urban Hennepin County participants in develop- ing local community development programs. Urban Hennepin County objectives are supportive of the national CDBG objectives and are intended to illustrate their application to the satisfaction of the short-term and long-term housing and community development needs of Urban Hennepin County. The national objectives of the CDBG program are: developing viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons; aiding in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; and meeting other community development needs having .a particular urgency. . Each activity carried out with CDBG funds must, of course, be eligible under program regulations (24 CFR 570) as well as fundable pursuant to a national program objective. The Urban Hennepin County CDBG objectives are presented by major program subheadings. They are highlighted under the subheading. ADMINISTRATION The CDBG program requires that Urban Hennepin County maximize the benefit of available funds consistent with the needs of low and moderate income persons and participant communities. In like manner it is a program responsibility to maximize program benefit and effectively administer program f~ds. Contain program administrative costs through the use of program manage- ment contracts for joint activities funded by several jurisdictions. . No more than three activities should be undertaken by any participating community. Each activity should be budgeted with at least $7,500. In cases where the planning allocation is less than $7,500 only one activity should be programmed. When funds are committed jointly with other participants to carry out a single activity these limits need not apply. Facilitate cooperation among participants in the development and imple- mentation of multi-community CDBG activities to address common concerns and needs. Support program activities which will generate program income to maintain a level of program funding. Maintain a process for citizen participation in the development, imple- mentation and evaluation of the Urban Hennepin County CDBG program. Implement Urban Hennepin County CDBG assisted activites in compliance with the Urban Hennepin County Antidisplacement and Relocation Plan and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property AcquisitIon Policies Act. HOUSING Through the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CRAS) of the Hennepin Housing Consortium. Urban Hennepin County has set out strategies and priorities for the use of available public and private resources to meet the housing needs of low and moderate income persons, particularly those with special needs. The Urban Hennepin County CDBG program is one of these resources and consistent with the CRAS is intended for use in achieving the following objectives: Encourage multi-community cooperation in housing development and rehab- ilitation programs. Support the development of new owner/renter housing affordable to low and moderate income households. . Support the rehabilitation of existing rental units and single-family dwellings. Support the development of transitional housing facilities for persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION As an intergovernmental effort, Urban Hennepin County includes a broad range of communities and neighborhoods, some of which, due to the age of their structures, are in need of assistance for infrastructure rehabilitation/ installation: Maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods and neighborhood commercial service centers through concentrated community development activities. . PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS The provision and improvement of public facilities represents a significant cost to the community and the individual user (particularly those of low and moderate income). Improve existing and assist in the development of new public facilities which benefit low and moderate income persons. Included in this objec- tive are those public and/or nonprofit facilities designed for providing shelter for persons with special needs. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Within the context of the Community Development Block Grant Program economic development must relate to the creation or retention of long-term employment opportUnities for low and moderate income individuals. Provide financial assistance to for-profit or non-profit business operations which will provide or retain permanent employment oppor- tunities for low and moderate income persons, at a ratio of at least one full-time job created or retained for each $10,000 of program funds used. . . PUBLIC SERVICES The CDBG program asserts that the expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of public services available to low and moderate income persons is essential for the development of viable communities. Provide funding for public services which represent a new service or expanded level of service consistent with CDBG regulations. REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS The Urban Hennepin County CDBG program is committed to the removal of barriers which prohibit or limit individuals with disabilities from accessing services, facilities and accommodations provided for public use. 1/28/92 STATMTOF.OBJ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YEAR XVIII (1992) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that the city of in cooperation with Hennepin County, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, is holding a public hearing on ___, 1992, at __.m. in the (~lace address). The public hearing is on housing and community development needs of the city and Urban Hennepin County, the Urban Hennepin County Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives and the proposed use of the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program planning allocation of $ by the city. During the July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1993 program year it is estimated that no additional program income from locally funded CDBG activities will be available to the city. The Statement of Objectives basically consists of the following seven program areas: (1) ADMINISTRATION, to maximize program benefit and effective- ly administer program funds; (2) HOUSING, to rehabilitate and assist in the development of housing which is affordable to low- and moderate-income households; (3) NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION, to maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods through concentrated community development activities; (4) PUBLIC FACILITIES, to improve existing and assist in the development of new public facilities which benefit low- and moderate-income persons; (5) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, to provide financial assistance to businesses which will provide or retain employment to the benefit of low- and moderate-income persons; (6) PUBLIC SERVICES, to expand and improve the quantity arid quality of public services available to lo~- and moderate-income persons; and (7) REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS, to alleviate conditions which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly or handicapped persons. ". The city of is proposing to undertake the following activities with Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting about July 1, 1992. . . Activity Bud~et Subsequent increases or decreases in the community planning allocation or the budget of any funded activity by the greater of $10,000 or 50 percent of the allocated amount is a substantial change and pursuant to Urban Hennepin County policy will be subject to a local public hearing. For additional information on the proposed activities, level of funding, program objectives and performance, contact the city of at or the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development at 348-6418. 1/28/92 YR18PBHR.NOT . . RESOLUTION RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR YEAR XVIII OF THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of , through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, and held a public hearing on ___, 1992 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's proposed use of $ from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of approves the following projects for funding from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program related and applicable program income and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Project Bud~et ADOPTED: , 1992 MAYOR 1/28/92 YR18CDBG.RES . . REQUEST FOR FUNDING YEAR XVIII (FY '92) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ THIS SECTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY NATIONAL OBJECTIVE/PROJECT BENEFIT: __ L/M Income-Area __ L/M Income-Housing __ L/M Income-Limited Clientele SIB-Area SIB-Spot __ Planning/Admin. __ Urgent Need PROJECT ELIGIBILITY: / Date Hennepin County Citation ER STATUS: Exempt Categorically Excluded Categorically Excluded/Exempt __Assessment Required Funds Released Date: ERS Specialist: Date: PROJECT NUMBER: / Da"te Financial Manager Number ------------------------------------.------------------------------------------ A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Community: 2. Project Name: 3. Contact Person: B. PROJECT DATA 1. Year XVIII Grant Request $ 2. Is this request to fund an existing project? Yes No 3. Leveraged Funds: Amount $ Source (To what extent does project leverage additional public or private funds/firm commitment?) 4. Location: Address (Attach map.) Citywide _ . . 5. Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible. Identify the Urban County objective/s to be met; provide a statement of anticipated results; identify what, if any alternative funding sources have been considered for the project; and for a multi-year project, describe the program accomplishments to date.) 6. Implementation Schedule: (Identify the major project tasks to be performed during implementation and their timing.) Task Date (Month/Year) 7. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component-- i.e., administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) BUDGET SOURCE OF FUNDS gmg Other CDBG (yr)/Other (identify) $ $ / $ $ / $ $ / $ $ $ Component Project Budget Total 1/28/92 REQUFUND.18 MAYOR Barb Brancel CO UNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 February 5, 1992 Mr. Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor Minnesota Department of Health 925 Delaware Street Southeast P.O. Box 59040 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040 . Dear Mr. Clark, This is in response to your memorandum received January 3, 1992, to Community Water systems with populations of 3,301 - 50,000. You wrote that such medium-size water systems must complete initial lead and copper monitoring by June 30, 1993 and that certain steps in the process must be completed by June 30, 1992. Only 30% of the City of Shorewood is connected to our municipal water system. The remainder of the City is on individual wells. Our system consists of 754 household hookups. The 1990 Post Census Local Review Report shows 5890 population in 2142 units. That is 2.75 persons per household in Shorewood. 754 households on our water system times 2.75 persons per household equals 2,074 persons are being served by the Shorewood water system. This is significantly lower than the medium-sized water systems you were referring to in your recent memorandum (3,301-50,000 population). . Therefore, the City of Shorewood requests to be reclassified as a small system, serving 3,300 or less water customers. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, (jfTY OF :HOREWOOD ___--n.Ai'l};.1 G A I {)V\V'\ 1/ V' 'fti lames c. Hurm jcity Administrator {, JCH.al - cc: Joel Dresel, City Engineer Don Zdrazil, Shorewood Public Works Director Bob Polston, Munitech, Inc. f 3 D-f, A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore . . MUNITECH, INC. 2373 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MOUND, MN 55364-1634 Phone: 612/472.2718 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Hurm City Administrator City of Shorewood FROM: Bob Polston ~~ Munitech, Inc. SUBJECT: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations-Control of Lead and Copper As a result of federal legislation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has directed, through the Minnesota Department of Health, that community water systems set up a testing program to evaluate their system, and conduct laboratory tests to determine the levels of lead and copper in drinking water. The program is being implemented in phases, as follows: 1) Large systems, serving 50,000 or more water customers 2) Medium systems, serving more than 3,300 water customers 3) Small systems, serving 3,300 or less water customers The City of Shorewoodls system has been incorrectly classified by the State Health Department as a medium system. The Shorewood system serves only 2,074 water customers. This is based on the number of water meters, 754, and the number of persons per household, 2.75, taken from 1990 census. The system does not serve any apartment buildings. In a telephone conversation I recently had with Mr. Bill Anderl at the Minnesota Health Department, I requested him to reclassify Shorewood as a small system. He advised me that the City must send a letter documenting the facts with the information included that the community system serves only 2,074 people. It is important for Shorewood to be classified as a small system because small systems do not need to complete the materials evaluation and set up testing until 1993. Ilm in the process of trying" to determine the cost of conducting the materials evaluation, and testing that Shorewood will need to budget for next year. I have enclosed a copy of the memorandum from the Health Department, along with the mandatory requirements, and the federal register. . UTILITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE . SERVICE FOR ALL MAKES OF METERS · SPECIALIST IN FLOW METER REBUILDING . . '. .The state legislature is to consider funding to allow the Health Department to cQnduct testing for lead and copper. It may be helpful if the City Council adopts a resolution asking the State Senator and Representative to support this funding. I will follow up with additional inf~rmation on this as it becomes available. We do need to get a letter off to the health Department requesting that Shorewood be classified as a small system. Call me if you have any questions. BP:jp~ -2- - - -... <...r) ~\. :::!o . 0--) 1..\\ ....::) ~l: ..;;:. ...s;:. <:;7 s9 ~ \ . .,\,..::> ... ... ~ ~ (")a3P%] ..... rT OJ 0 ~ OJ 0 rT>-3 :0 -0 ..c ctl e: ..... ::l :T' '0 ctl M'I 00 ::r::r C1 ~~ ::l 1"'\ ::l Octl"O ::l rTC ctl Cll '" 0 ::rJ ~Y' " "? enCllOJ .....::lCll en OJ .....0 3 en CTl m e:OJ..... e: OJ e: ::l <rT Cll r- o '--':' ~ -J _ rne: o,rTl"'\ rn .....en M'I - ....j ~ -i .0 ctl ::r en OJ rT o 0 a S (")enCll Cll 0 en .....Ql !"1Cll. < Q - -J;:. ......c.. '-, \ ~ ctl ::l 0 rTO rT Clll"'\ .0 l> ~ po.,) 2 ::l :rn ctl 0 o e: ctl en Cll oen n 0 CTl ~ ,- rT>-3e: ::l ctl ::l 1"'\ . M'le: l> ~ '" )> ~ Z l> O'l ctl ::r rn en ::l rT rT ..... I-'M'lrn ~ r ::rJ ~ ~ I"'\Ql e: en :T' en ....- ..... :l: :l: -< ~ ::l0 en e: Cll M'I"'- ,..-00 (Jl ..~~ ~. 0 0 '" ..... ,..- 0 en 0 Cll .....0 c: c: ;:l -as: ("- ,.." e: 0 .....1"'\- .....OJe: VI VI :;: :I: ~. .... .... z O~ ~::l 0 0 Cll lE- I< ..... 0 z z 0 ..... '<OrT e: 0 ""'rT- rT Cl Cl oe:en ::l e: rT::r rT'O en c: c: C ;.. ~ " e: rTO OJ OJ o e: z z C/'J en ~_~ d. .... .... >~ en rT 0 rT "0 1"'\ Ql ~ ~ C1 - 'i't :T' 3 ..... ,.." "0 0'0 1"'\ VI VI 0 2 -I ..\~ . OJCll..... M'I ,.." o-Cll ::r0 Cll u .. C 1- Z <1"'\..... 0 OrT.....OJ Ql rn ~ G) n ""'f ..._t;. ctl ..... 1"'\ 1"'\ :T' 0 1"'\ Octl"O ~ 00- ctl 0 en ~enQl C ,I.. "'" III III Cll 0 rT ,..- Cll 1"'\ m ~ \~ ::l Cll ::rG) rT -rT 2 ";> ~ ~, '< (j ..... ::l OJ c: ....- 0 C ,.." ..... '" - 2 ).. to .:i Ql en en rT en "0 o III - - -i "': to '" .... ""'3rn e: ::l rT 0 1"'\ ..... - '" en ~o C "0 C en \0 OJ C ::r 0 )> I"'\QlCll ctl 3 ::l Cll ctl III C ;::'0 rT .....0. 0-0 ctl OJ 0 >< 0 2 ::r\O .....\0 < I-' 0 OJ 0. 0 m CllOrT o 1"'\ 0 OJ Cll :3 3 en (') 1"'\ :0 o Ql 1"'\ ..... M'I "0'0"0 G) m "'-"0 ..... rT ..... .....1"'\ 2 .0 .....'< en ::r 0 OJ Cll Cll Cll :0 r- c ::l 0 .....Cll 0-0 rT'" ..... 0 2 ctl C ~O::l ..... M'I ..... ..... 0 - en Cll 1"'\ ..... rn ctl 0 1"'\ 3 C )> rTQl rTlll C rT o ctl ..... C"l C) ""C ..... 1"'\ I...J. ::rl"'\ rn OJ::r o,::l ::0 0 n r- 0 o ..... c Cll rTCll o .....OJ c: VI < m 0 (') ::l I< 1"'\ OJ OJ rT M'lenl"'\ " '::f :0 0 l> en ..... ::l 1"'\ rT 0 rT'< 0 .., z C m . I-'rn ..... OJ ::r ctl o 1"'\ c: (!) s: 2 l> :=: m )> \00. III en 0 .....0 o .......... ::0 ~ 0 z r- . \0 ..... en rTenrn o 0 ::l ~ 0 0 -I :0 (J) .....0 rT ....-........... C rT rT m ~ C. > C ::0 l> -i . rT ctl::lO-rTen ....- ....- 0 VI r n r ..... 1"'\ 0 .......... ::l::lOJ - C m :a (J) " " - 0 ..... 0 0 3 0- C I.C rT 0 0 '< z :0 "Cl::l en30Cll..... ....- e: " " ::;i C/'J m c: c: I-' ,..- '0 ,..-. 0 ::l 0 1"'\ r r CllrT ..... 0 I.CI"'\Cll l> l> < Ill::r -Cll::l ;l';" ~ ~ ""C .... .... .... en 1"'\ lE-rTc..... M'lo- 0 0 0 Cll 0 -ctl3""'0 ..... C '< z z ""C - u .. C . 0- C Cll 0. 0 C m 0\0 III ctl III 3 I-' \0 C Ill::r enl"'\::lO- o,ctl r- ~ I-' ....- Cll rTen )> ..... rT ",,'::l III 1"'\ III .....::r ::r rT\O en '" 0::l0 -i '< ctl rT 0. \0 C c.n - 0) 0 0 0. III ctlrT -..... c.o ~ C (") o 1"'\ I"'\::r "0 . 0. 0 0 2 !" 1"'\ ctl Cll ctl ""'Cll 1"'\ . c ::l rnOJ en 0 0 0 (') m :;t1cn ,..- 0 >-30 "" ar> Cll C ::l ::l rT Cll ::rrT 0 c'" I.Ccn 0 e: -::r cn Cll C :1%.... ..... rT3 lE-Cll en en C mil: >m 0 0-- .....ctl cn 2 cz ::l ctl 0 Cll -i .... go III 1"'\ I.C ... ..... ... en .... ::n me nl: mil: Zm tn::u en tnm - . . . m Minnesota Department of Health Division of Etlvironmental Health 925 Delaware Street Southeast P.O. Box 59040 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040 (612) 627-5100 JAN - 3 /992 M E MaR AND U M TO: Community Water Systems with Populations of 3,301 - 50,000 FROM: R i ch~rd D. Cl ark, P. E.,. Supervi sor.~ ~.i ..- PubllC Water Supply Unlt <':::::~--""------:- Section of Water Supply and Well Management PHONE: 612/627-5180 SUBJECT: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations - Control of lead and Copper in Medium-Size Water Systems The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established national drinking water standards that require all public water systems to optimize corrosion centrol in order to minimize lead contamination resulting from the corrosion of 'plumbing materials. These regulations establish a treatment technique that may include: 1) corrosion control treatment, 2) source water treatment, 3) lead service line replacement, and 4) public education. These requirements are triggered by lead and copper action levels measured in samples collected at consumers. taps. The lead action level is exceeded if the concentration of lead in more than 10 percent of tap water samples collected in any monitoring period is greater than 0.015 mg/l. The copper action level is exceeded if 10 percent of these samples is greater than 1. 3 mg/L. Medium-size water systems (serving 3,301 - 50,000 persons) must complete initial monitoring during two consecutive six-month monitoring periods by June 30, 1993. Sample site selection must commence with a complete materials evaluation of the distribution system in order to identify a pool of targeted sampling sites. This process must be accomplished by June 30, 1992, under the present timeline. The sites selected for the sampling pool must meet the criteria listed in 40 CFR 141.86(a), which is summarized in Attachment 1. This materials evaluation step'is critical to the monitoring strategy and must be accomplished with care in order that high-risk locations are properly identified for the initial monitoring period. EPA has released a draft guidance manual that provides additional information for identi~ying h~gh- risk sites. Selected guidance from this draft guidance manual 1S provlded as Attachment 2. An Equal Opportunity Employer . . ATTACHMENT 1 Subject: Samplinq Pool Tiers for Tap Monitorinq Tier 1 Sampling Sites - Single family structures* that: (a) contain copper pipes with lead solder installed after 1982 or contain lead pipes~ and/or (b) are served by lead service line. Tier 2 Sampling Sites - Buildings, including multiple-family residences that: (a) contain copper pipes with lead solder installed after 1982 or contain lead pipes, and/or (b) are served by a lead service line. Tier 3 Sampling Sites - Single family structures that: (a) contain copper pipes with lead solder installed before 1983. * 'When multiple-family residences comprise at least 20 percent of the structures, the systems may include these types of structures in its , sampling pool. Note: Sampling sites may not include faucets that have point-of-use or point- of-entry treatment devices designed to remove inorganic contaminants. If a site has a home water softener connected to the cold-water kitchen tap or bathroom sink tap, it cannot be included in the sampling pool. ~< ; t .:.':~~ ,_.... ,;' ; ~ ',..;./".' ;:.,' {_:~:."'~c" '. ,-t.. ( l~"'" '-" 3 f...., ,~.H' ':',1,1 . r 21620 County Road 50 Corcoran, MN 55340 (612) 420-4546 January 28, 1992 TO: City Councils of Hennepin County FROM: Linda Milow, Secretary SUBJECT: 1992 Hennepin County Fair . We are planning the 1992 Hennepin County "Olde Tyme" Fair for July 23-26 at the Corcoran Lions Park, located at the crossroads of Bass Lake Road and Hwy. 101, in Corcoran. Once again our County Fair will resemble an old fashioned county fair, with our rural setting and brightly striped tents. Entertainment is being planned for virtually all residents of Hennepin County to enjoy -- demolition derbies, moto cross races, talent shows, diaper derbies, kiddy tractor pulls, a Senior Citizen dance line on Senior Citizen Day, continual free entertainment, 4H and Open Class judging, a midway, and much, much more. . We, would like to ask you to be a part of this annual event. As always, we need any financial support you are able to give. We need to get the word out to every resident of Hennepin County that we do, in fact, HAVE a County Fair, and would be happy to send a press release if you have a newsletter or newspaper. We welcome any interest and suggestions you have. Communications may be sent to: Linda Milow, Secretary Hennepin County Fair 21620 County Road 50 Corcoran, MN 55340 420-4546 Thank you for your cooperation and support. Please plan on attending the 1992 Hennepin County fair! /4-( . . -'! Ann F. Christian 19490 Muirfield Circle Shorewood, MN 55331 January 28, 1992 Ms. Barbara Brancel, Mayor City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Dear Ms. Brancel: I wish to request that sidewalks and bicycle lanes be installed along the east side of Old Market and Covington Roads between the new intersection at Highway 7 and Vine Hill Road. The City could use the Minnesota state Aid System financing that is available and the required curb and gutters have already been installed on Old Market Road. With the opening of the new intersection at Old Market Road and Highway 7, the addition of a sidewalk and a bicycle lane would make this road safer for both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. This road is the only connector between the neighborhood streets of Muirfield Circle, Waterford Place, Chartwell Hill, Vine Ridge Road and Sweetwater Curve. These additions ensure the safety of everyone using this street. In addition, I would like to see the stop sign at the east end of Covington Road maintained. The new stoplight intersection is meant to move traffic in and out of Waterford, Vine Ridge and Sweetwater subdivisions but it is not intended to be a short cut for traffic traveling west from Highway 62 and Townline Road to Highway 7. Removing this stop sign and changing the curve of this road, as previously proposed, would increase the likelihood of additional traffic cutting through the middle of our neighborhood. Both of my requests are aimed at reducing any potential safely hazards posed by the completion of the new intersection. Thank you for considering them at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, tZwn ,rc Ivu~r;;;:J Ann F. Christian cc: Brad Nielsen, City Planner Jim Berdahl, Water ford Homeowners Association Old Market Road Task Force Pl-~ CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 10, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 27, 1992 8382 (G) 8383 (G) 8384 (G) 8385 (G) 8386 (G) 8387 (G) 8388-8434 8435 8436 (G) 8437 (G) 6438 (G) "439 (G) 8440 (G) 8441 (G) 8442 (G) 8443 (G) 8444 (G) 8445 (G) 8446 (G) 8447 (L) 8448 (L) 8449 (L) 8450 (L) 8451 (L) 8452 (L) 8453 (L) .;~ (L) ~8456 (G) 8457 (G) 8458 (G) 8459 (G) 8460 (G) 8461 (G) 8462 (G) 8463 8464 (G) 8465 (G) 8466 (G) MCMA-Urban/Regnl Inst. American Nat Bank/Trust American Nat Bank/Trust Norwest Bank MN N.A. AFSCME Council 14 Deputy Registrar #59 These were last list void Wendy Davis Gov Finance Offcr Assoc Timothy Heiland James Hurm Joseph Lugowski Cellular Telephone Co. Bradley Nielsen Northern States Power Joseph Pazandak Pepsi-Cola Company Fernando Garcia Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liqour Harry Niemela Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Ryan Properties US West Communications void First State Bank Commissioner of Revenue PERA ICMA Retirement Trust City cty Credit Union Child Support Enforce. Anoka cty Suuport/Coll. Void A & K Construction Wendy Davis Dept of Nat Resources CONTINUED NEXT PAGE seminar reg-J. Hurm Bond paYment-series 1987A Bond paYment-series 1989A semi-annual fee-series A12-84 Delta dental group 538 Vehicle registration-pw checks section 125 reimbursement Conference regist-A. Rolek Parks mileage Mileage/lunch mtg expense Sewer school mileage Cellular phone air time section 125 reimbursement street light utilities Mileage/city hall renov supplies Pop machine rental Recycling award Liquor purchases Liquor, wine & misc purchases Wine purchases Jan rent for store I Liquor and wine purchases Liquor, wine & misc purchases Jan rent for store II utilities and advertising Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll deductions deductions deductions deductions deductions deductions deductions Payment voucher #6 Section 125 reimbursement Well permit fees -1- AMOUNT 145.00 83,360.00 115,146.25 200.00 224.00 162.00 127.00 220.00 16.80 24.45 37.80 13.21 240.00 1,767.58 68.97 10.00 50.00 2,179.56 2,491.22 915.83 1,564.00 3,069.46 2,199.70 2,115.00 321.14 6,525.88 1,038.48 1,971.90 616.28 95.00 89.10 110.59 7,674.31 214.00 250.00 CK NO CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 10, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JANUARY 27, 1992 (CONTINUED) 8467 8468 8469 8470 8471 8472 8473 8474 8475 8476 (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) Bellboy Corporation Griggs, Cooper and Co. Johnson Brothers Liquor Ed Phillips and Sons Quality Wine/Spirits Weekly News Inc. The Management Center James Hurm Metro Waste Control Corom Metro Waste Control Corom Liquor purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Liquor and wine purchases Advertising Mini MBA regist-J Hurm section 125 reimb/brk exp MWCC application fee SE Area WTP Sac charge 1,797.08 4,120.42 1,109.44 459.15 995.17 240.00 765.00 160.20 30.00 650.00. Total General 222,003.80 Total Liquor 23,577.17 Total Checks Issued 245,580.97 . -2- CK NO CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 10, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 8477 8478 8479 8480 8481 8482 8483 8484 8485 8486 8487 .488 489 8490 8491 8492 8493 8494 8495 8496 8497 ~498 .499 8500 8501 8502 8503 8504 8505 8506 Void Advanced Graphics Earl F. Andersen-Assoc. Browning-Ferris Indust. Business Records Corp. C.H. Carpenter Lumber Chaska Parts Service Griffco Inc. Harmon Glass Paul Helgesen Hennepin County Life and Safety Metro Waste Control Comm Midwest Business Prod. Mpls Spring/Body Inc. MN Suburban Publication City of Mound Northern States Power Orr, Schelen, Mayeron and Associates Kenneth Potts SLMPSD Thomas Mfg Co. Tonka Auto & Body City of Tonka Bay Turf Supply Company US West Communications WMI Services of MN Waste Management. Water Products Zep Manufacturing PURPOSE Printer cartridges Street signs Satellite rental Voting machine maint contr. Picnic table boards Vehicle maint supplies Shop supplies Window replace-Badger warm hse city hall janitorial services December prisoner expense First aid supplies Contract paYment Office supplies Vehicle maint supplies Publishing First qtr fire contract utilities December engineering fees on-going 459.86 general 1574.50 pw facility 2667.09 old mkt rd 1604.25 shady hills 174.38 lift stations 107.50 January prosecuting fee December booking fee Picnic table legs Vehicle repair supplies Fourth qtr water/sewer Parks-grass seed/fertile Telephone services Warming house rental Waste removal services Meter repair supplies Shop supplies Total checks for approval Total check approval list -3- AMOUNT 73.90 426.83 126.75 712.50 165.83 84.98 24.39 296.20 440.00 216.00 12.30 31,389.00 114.44 63.04 215.66 1,102.50 1,098.73 6,587.58 1,458.33 201.24 610.00 36.00 411. 30 2,733.00 166.93 150.00 258.00 42.96 60.30 49,278.69 294,859.66 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR FEBRUARY 10, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECKS REGISTER FOR JANUARY 28, 1992 PAYROLL 205860 Void 205861 (L) Scott Bartlett 39.0 reg hours 196.04 205862 (G) Randie Berg 60.5 reg hours 266.50 205863 (G) Matthew Chapman 23.0 reg hours 106.20 205864 (G) Jeff Chiles 39.5 reg hours 169.99 205865 (G) Charles Davis 80.0 reg hours-10 OT 679.12 205866 (G) Wendy Davis 80.0 reg hours 773.66 205867 (L) Kevin Foss 2.5 reg hours 13.16 205868 (L) Cory Frederick 40.0 reg hours 199.48 205869 (L) John Fruth 18.0 reg hours 87.55 205870 (L) Jerry Harmsen 15.0 reg hours 74.81 205871 (G) Timothy Heiland 42.75 reg hours 230.67 205872 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80.0 reg hours 718.5_ 205873 (L) Rachel Huppert 12.25 reg hours 61. 0 205874 (G) James Hurm 80.0 reg hours 1,440.52 205875 (L) Brian Jakel 38.5 reg hours 186.17 205876 (G) Dennis Johnson 80.0 reg hours-12 OT 888.03 205877 (L) Martin Jones 21.75 reg hours 108.47 205878 (L) John Josephson 60.0 reg hours 265.34 205879 (L) William Josephson 80.0 reg hours 602.99 205880 (L) Mark Karsten 20.5 reg hours 108~39 205881 (G) Douglas Koerting 36.5 reg hours 140.70 205882 (G) Jason Koerting 29.25 reg hours 114.84 205883 (G) Anne Latter 80.0 reg hours 780.07 205884 (L) Susan Latterner 34.25 reg hours 169.64 205885 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80.0 reg hours-10 OT 846.86 205886 (L) Russell Marron 28.0 reg hours 148.43 205887 (G) Lawrence Niccum 80.0 reg hours 654.27 205888 (G) Susan Niccum 80.0 reg hours 641. 45 205889 (G) Brent Nicolle 47.5 reg hours 188.4_ 205890 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80.0 reg hours 924.6 205891 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80.0 reg hours 947.18 205892 (G) Joseph Prehall 44.5 reg hours 177.19 205893 (G) Daniel Randall 80.0 reg hours-10 OT 889.73 205894 (L) Brian Roerick 8.25 reg hours 43.43 205895 (G) Alan Rolek 80.0 reg hours 1,060.02 205896 (L) Brian Rosenberger 15.0 reg hours 78.96 205897 (L) Christopher Schmid 80.0 reg hours 378.40 205898 (G) Howard Stark 80.0 reg hours-10 OT 764.90 205899 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 80.0 reg hours 464.89 205900 (G) Ralph Wehle 80.0 reg hours-10 OT 720.92 205901 (L) Dean Young 80.0 reg hours 591. 95 205902 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80.0 reg hours 1.140.16 Total general 15,729.45 Total liquor 3.314.30 Total payroll 19.043.75 -4- ~ . MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: FROM: MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS, AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR AL ROLEK, FINANCE DIRECTOR lJ/~- FEBRUARY 6, 1992 DATE: RE: FOURTH QUARTER, 1991 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Attached are the preliminary financial statements for the City of Shorewood for the fourth quarter of 1991. These statements reflect the financial activity of the City for the year ended December 31, 1991. Due to the preliminary nature of the data used to assemble these reports, account totals and fund balances are subject to change; however, the results reflected here give a good preliminary view of the City's financial operations through 1991. Following are a few brief comments relating to the statements. GENERAL FUND The General Fund, while performing well throughout the year, shows a balance of expenditures and transfers in excess of revenues for the year by $25,899. However, this "paper" excess of expenditures and transfers over revenue is due to the transfer of funds from the General Fund "surplus" fund balance, which was budgeted in prior years, to other funds. Transfers were made in 1991 from the General Fund to other funds, such as Capi tal proj ects Funds. Some of these transfers were funds budgeted in 1991, such as the budgeted capital improvement funds. Some of the transferred funds were those that were budgeted in previous years and were included in the City's surplus fund balance. , ----, -0. I / /-5b -! A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore " MEMO FOURTH QUARTER, 1991 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FEBRUARY 6, 1992 PAGE 2 A recap of the General Fund activity for 1991 is as follows: Revenue Expenditures Net Revenue before transfers $2,237,715 (1.752,902) 484,813 1991 Budgeted transfers Net Revenue after Budgeted Transfers Transfers of Surplus funds Net Revenue after Transfers (245,712) 239,101 (265,000) ( 25,899) It can be seen by this recap that, after the transfer of budgeted amounts to other funds, net revenue over expenditures was actually $239,101. Expenditures exceed revenues only after the transfer of surplus funds. This indicates that the General Fund budget was closely adhered to throughout the year and revenues exceeded actual expenditures. Further analysis of budget data shows that neither revenue nor expenditures actually exceeded budgetary levels. While the budget for both revenues and expenditures was $2,302,596, total revenues for 1991 were $2,237,715 and total expenditures were $2,263,613. The revenue shortfall was primarily due to the loss of HACA Aid which was withheld by the State. The city lost a total of $66,971 in HACA Aid in 1991. If the City had received its full HACA allotment, 1991 revenues.would have exceed budget by $2,090. other factors contributing to revenues differences in 1991 were the shifting of recycling aid and city clean-up fees to the Recycling Fund. These revenues were received, but were recorded into the Recycling Fund instead of the General Fund. Likewise, the expenses of the recycling program and city clean-up were recorded in the Recycling Fund. Other revenues, such as interest income, court fine. revenue, and miscellaneous revenue, helped to make up the difference in the General Fund revenues. Tax collections for the year were approximately 99% of the tax levy. Expenditures for 1991 were also under budget. Departmental expenditures, as a rule, came in at under budgeted levels. Like the revenues, expenses relating to recycling and city clean-up were recorded in the Recycling Fund and did not reflect in the General Fund for 1991. Expenditures which exceeded budget were in the areas of legal fees, snow removal, engineering, and tree maintenance. ~ ~ MEMO FOURTH QUARTER, 1991 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FEBRUARY 6, 1992 PAGE 3 Overall, the General Fund was well within budget, but the General Fund balance was lowered by $25,899 because of transfers to other funds. The General Fund balance, which started the year at $1,256,860, stands at $1,230,961 at year end. This level, which equates to approximately 50% of our annual budget, is designated as working capital. As the City receives the bulk of its revenues in July and December, it is'necessary to accumulate such a balance to carry out operations throughout the first half of the year and to avoid borrowing for this period. This level is also recommended by the City I S auditor. The City should attempt to maintain this ratio without becoming excessive. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS For 1991, both the Water Fund and the Sewer Fund show a loss on the year. These losses are actually due to depreciation expense in both funds, plus a $20,000 transfer to Capital Projects funds from the Water Fund. The cash balance in both funds is increasing, which shows that the funds operate on a positive cash flow basis. However, depreciation expense, which can be roughly equated with expense for the replacement of assets, throws these funds into a loss. These funds can be recapped as follows: Revenue Expense(wjo depreciation) Net Income before Depr. Less: Depreciation Transfers Net Loss Water Fund $206,151 (135.333) 70,818 ( 56,586) ( 20.000) ( 5.758) Sewer Fund $562,249 (486.110) 76,139 (175,628) -0- (99.489) Cash Balance, Dec. 31 Cash Balance, Jan. 1 Net Increase $ 84,757 43.532 $ 41. 225 $607,530 533.727 $ 73.803 As it can be seen, while the funds both had a net lose on the year, each experience a net increase in cash flow for the year. Increasing rates by the MWCC and the need to rebuild our lift stations have a great impact on the Sewer Fund. Sewer rates were increased in 1992, which should handle these increases. ~ " ~ MEMO FOURTH QUARTER, 1991 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FEBRUARY 6, 1992 PAGE 4 The water rates may also need to be adjusted to alleviate the losses. These funds will be monitored closely throughout 1992. LIOUOR FUND The Liquor Fund finished the year with a preliminary net operating profit, before transfers, of $85,100. Sales for the year were, $1.455 million, an increase of 11.73% over 1990 levels, and profits equalled 5.85% of sales. The increases in sales are partially due to product cost increases and tax increases, but still show a real increase in level by5 to 6%. Both stores are performing well and show improvement in profits over 1990. OTHER FUNDS The City's construction funds for the various projects, and the debt service funds appear to be financially sound. Capital projects funds were created during the year for purposes outlined in the newly adopted Capital Improvement Plan, and money was transferred into these funds from the General Fund. These funds will see more activity in 1992 as the CIP budgets kick in. INVESTMENTS The City's investments as of December 31, 1991, are as follows: Institution Marquette Bank Dain Bosworth Merrill Lynch Prudential-Bache witt Financial TOTAL INVESTMENTS AND AVG. INTEREST RATE Average Interest Rate 6.56% 7.77% 7.32% 5.50% 6.89% 6.81% Amount Invested $4,031,270 792,108 95,000 98,000 395,985 $5,412,363 A detailed investment schedule is kept and is available to you if you would like one. All investments of the City's excess funds are made in accordance with guidelines set forth by Minnesota State Statutes. Again, these are preliminary reports. Adjustments may be made as better data is received. Please feel free to call me regarding the statements. I will be happy to discuss them with you at your convenience. U L.J Cl ~ Z I- U 0 if) a.. W L.J en ::::> z " w :) < > ...J < W ...J :) ...J I- 0::: < :) t) :) ., < l- t) 0 < z + ..- Z 0 :) en I- ., en ::::> I- ..- L.J I- l.J.. " >- W Cl < " :) ~ Cl .....J m ~ m 4: c:: 0::: a.. D < W Z c:: W < ~ C) m L.J u.. Z < ., r ~ . N N ~ ~ ~ N ..- ~ ~ ~ N Q . .. .... .... N N N ..-..-..- - 0 0 0 0 (SUOllUV.) S~Yl'oa ~= (.) I.iJ 0 > 0 Z l- V> (.) 0 W 0:::: Il.. :::) I.iJ en I- - 0 C) ::J Z <C( ...J W <C( ...J ::J a.. ...J I- <C( ::J (.) X ::J ~ <C( .... (.) w .cr; + % - e ::) CJ'I 0 ~ CJ'I .... - Z I.iJ .... C) ~ I.iJ => 0 <C( C) ::) ~ 0 lL. cc ::) cc -1 a: a.. 0 <( <C( a::: a: W <C( Z ~ W to C> I.iJ l.L. Z ~ .., .... N N DO '" .... N ~ DO '" .... N Q . . . . . . . . . . C'i C'i - - - - Q 0 0 0 (s UO!ll I....) SHy-,10a (.) WJ Cl > 0 :z .... I'.) 0 a... WJ en e" en I.LJ 0 ::;) ~ en <( ::J I.LJ ~ Z ~ Cl ~ :::> = ...J :z: ::;) I.LJ 0 -, [l. u... :z >< L.J L.J a... ~ >< :z - <{ L.J ::;) '" + -, '" 0 - e:::: I- W en >- L.J <( en Z ::J :2 I.LJ :z ::;) W WJ :z > L.J C) L.J a:: > ~ 0- I.LJ <{ a:: ~ 0 4( :2 co L.J I.i.. :z <{ -, .. t'.I t'.I 110 \D .. N - 110 \D .. t'.I 0 . . . . . . . . . . N N - - - - 0 0 0 0 I (SUO!II!V<t) SH'fil0a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 CITY OF SHOREWOOD PRELIMINIARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I LiAiE 12i31/91 TIME 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE . ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUA.L TOTAL AMi BUDGEitO PERCENT ----------..--- .. .---.....--..--- --..---..--- --.-------- --------------..--- I FUNO # 10 GENERAL FUND I REVENUE TAXES I 10-4002 CURRENT AD VALOREM 761,854.63 CR 1,495,488.98 CR 1,840,663.00 CR 81 ~, 10-4003 DELI NQUENT AD VALOREM 25,868.17 CR 43,493.62 CR 0.00 0;, I 10-4004 PtNALT I ES & INTE~i:ST 1,291.94 CR 1,313.64 CR 0.00 0" " 10-4005 FISCAL DISPARITIES 40,177.32 CR 78,382.83 CR 0.00 0% 10-4007 FORFEIT ED i A,X SALES 0.00 9,195.08 CR 0.00 0;, I TOTAL TAXES 829 l 192.06 1,627 ,874.15 1,840,663.00 88% LICENSES, PERMITS ,:t :: ~- ~ C; I ' :,...l......; 10-4022 CIGARETTES Lie 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-4023 LI QUOR Ll!; 0.00 8,175.',:0 CR 8,200.00 CR 100% I 10-4024 DOCKS LIC 0.00 154.00 eR O.ljO 0% 10-4025 OTHER BUSINESS 0.00 375.00 CR 500.00 CR 75% 10-4020 RENTAL HOUSING LICENSE FEES 0,00 0,00 3,JOO.00 Co 0:, " I 10-4027 BLOG PERMITS 5,691.63 CR 149,380.77 CR 150,000.00 CR 100!, HH028 TREE TRIMMER LICENSES 0.00 37.00 -'CI 0.00 0% .'II 10-4029 DOG !ICENSES 207.50 CR 1,891.00 CR 1,800.00 CR 105% 10-4030 HORSE PERi'llTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 os, I 10-4031 OThER NON BUSINESS 0.00 0.00 500.00 Ck OJ, 10-4032 STATE SURCHARGE COLLECTIONS 347.60 eR 8,542.95 CR 8,000.00 CR 107% I TOTAL LlCENSES, PERMITS & FEES 6,246.73 168,555.72 172 , 500.00 98?6 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE I 10-4048 COMM DEV BLK \~RANTS TRFD FR HENN C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-4049 LOCAL GOV AID 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-4050 HOMESTEAD TAX AID 72,715.64 CR 137,426.13 CR 0.00 0% I 10-4051 MSA ROAD MAINTENANCE AID 1,375.50 CR 13,755.00 CR 13,000.00 CR 106% 10-4052 MN DNR SHORELAND GRANT 0.00 2,500.00 CR 0.00 0% 10-4055 SLDG PERMIT SURCHARGE REBATES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-4056 HENNEPIN COUNTY ROAD AID 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-4057 COUNTY RECYCLE AID 0.00 0.00 49,840.00 CR 0% I TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVEN 74,091.14 153,681.13 62,840.00 245% FINES & FORFEITURES I 10-4067 HENNEPIN COUNTY COURT FINES 9,768.69 CR 101,199.86 CR 90,000.00 CR 112% TOTAL FINES & FORF EITURES 9,768.69 101,199.86 90,000.00 lln I CHARGES FOR SERVICE 10-4077 ELECTION FIll NG FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-4078 SALES OF COPIES 0.00 269.97 CR 500.00 CR 54% 10-4079 SPECIAL ASSES SEARCHES 240.00 CR 1,954.50 CR 4,000.00 CR 49:; 10-4080 ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES 1,116.54 CR 972.15 CR 4,000.00 CR 24% I /30-1 I DAE 12/31/91 TIME- 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT ;jAGE 3 ACCOUNT NUM8ER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AnT BUDGETED PERCENT I .~.._---------- ------------- ---------... -..-------- -----------------.. 10-5135 CONTRACTUAL 585.00 9,979.31 10,600.00 94% 10-5137 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 820.84 1,633.34 2,500.00 65% I 10-5138 PRINT !PUBLISH 192.20 4,748.59 3,500.00 136% 10-5143 11ISC. SERVICES 0.:0 100.00 0.00 0% 10-5140 TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-5153 SU8SCRIP-MEMBER 1,000.00 21,941. 00 23,560.00 931, 10-5163 OTHER IMPROV 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0% 10-5165 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 O~ ., I TOTAL MAYOR & COUNCIL 3,571.40 49,917.70 56,803.00 885, AL'MINISTRATOR I 1U-),:Ul REGULAR SALARIES 6,123.16 61,912.67 63,500.00 98% 10-5202 OVERTI!1E O. i~iO 94.50 0.00 0:., I 10-5203 (Hhi TIME SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 u" ., 10-520:: i'lN UNEi'1P CQi1P FUND 0.00 5)220.00 5,220.00 1005, 10-5206 FICH cm SHARE 581.58 4,773.80 4,148.00 115'& 10-5207 PERA CITY S HAR E 1,624 AS 2,175.90 2,429.00 90% I 10-5208 INS. CITY SHARE 354,43 4,619.30 5,442.00 85'& 10-5d9 ,:EDICARE cm SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5223 JiAINT-Eyu!PM:NT 285. (11) 455.00 985.00 46% I 10-5,)0 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 90.81 287.81 250. ')0 115% 10-5235 CONTRACTUAL O. aCl 2,200.00 1,400.00 157% 10-5237 TRAVEL, CC ;iF , SCH 102.66 593.24 3,250.00 18% I 10-5243 MISC SERVICES 0.00 2,499.99 2,500.00 100% 10-5253 SUSSCR I P-Mi:MSER 0.00 491. 80 530.00 93% 10-5265 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL ADMINISTRATOR 9,162.09 85,324.01 89,654.00 95% GENERAL GOVT SERVICES I 10-5301 REGULAR SALARIES 4,814.44 33,699.66 50,306.00 67% 10-5303 PART TIME SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-5305 MN UNEMP COMP FUND 0.00 6,760.00 6,760.00 100i, 10-5306 FICA CITY SHARE 361.11 2,504.23 3,848.00 65% 10-5307 PERA CITY SHARE 215.69 1,301.53 2,254.00 58% 10-5308 INS. CITY SHARE 258.53 2,671.59 6,212.00 43% I 10-5309 MEDICARE CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5310 SEVtRANCE & OTHER PAY 0.00 28,200.00 28,200.00 100% 10-5320 OFFICE SUPPLI ES 1,028.52 11,938.36 10,000.00 I1n I 10-5323 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 55.00 099.00 525.00 133% 10-5326 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 44.34 .150.00 301, 10-5335 CONTRACTUAL 341. 88 10,987.52 11,000.00 100% I 10-5336 COMMUNICATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5337 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 643.50 1,810.06 1,850.00 98% 10-5338 PRINT /PU8LISH 638.64 5,093.76 2,500.00 204% 10-5343 MISC. SERVICES 0.00 0.00 200.00 U% I 10-5353 SUSSCRIP-MEMBER 1,000.00-CR 274.28 150.00 183% 10-5363 OTHER IMPROVE 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0~ ., 10-5365 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL GE NERAL GOVT SERVICES 7,357.31 105, 984 .~,.5 125,1)5.00 85% I FINANCE DATE 12/31/91 rIME. 05:55 Cln OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 4 I ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMI BUDGETED PERCENT ____4_________ ------------- ---------- --------..... ----------- .------ I 10-5401 REGULAR SALARIES 13,243.29 57,245.55 57,594.00 99% 10-5402 O. T. SALARIES 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0% I 10-5406 FICA cm SHARE 995.50 4,172.81 4,482.00 93% 10-5407 PERA CITY SHARE 593.n 2,564.58 2,025.00 98% 10-5408 INS. CITY SHARE 789.96 5,100. 19 6,028.00 85% I 10-5420 OFFICE SUPPLI ES 416./'5 1,032.88 1,700.00 61% 10-5423 MAl NT-EQUIPMENT 157.00 1,376.00 1,800.00 76% 10-5426 GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.40 219.99 100.00 220% 10-5431 FINANCIAL 0.00 655.02 1,500.00 44% I 10-5432 AUD IT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5435 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 0.00 o .ljO 0% 10-5437 TRAVEL, CONF, 5CH 212.80 1,709.91 3,800.00 45% I 10-5438 PRI NT (PUBLISH 0.00 507.60 750.00 68% ,0-5443 :1 I SC. SERVICES 0.00 141. 00 0.00 0" 'C LO-::445 INVESTI~t,~T SVC CHtjS. 20.00 719.56 500.00 144~i I 10-5450 RENTAL 0.00 145.00 75.00 193), 10-5a53 susseR I h~Ei1SER 0.00 210.00 200.00 105% 10-5462 11ACHINERY-EQUIP 0.00 299.00 500.00 60* 10-5465 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 O?~ I TOTAL FINANCE 16,481.47 76,099.09 82,654.00 '72'~o PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 10-5520 OFFICE SUPPLI ES 83.83 1,092.13 000.00 18210 10-5530 LEGAL 18, 76fL30 73,34 9.82 55,000.00 134% I 10-5532 AUO IT 0.00 4,824.00 4,700.00 103% 10-5533 ENGINEERING 19,090.26 67,396.80 25,000.00 270% 10-5535 CONTRACT-ASSESOR 2,950.00 33,128.00 31,992.00 104% I 10-5543 MISC SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5544 OTHER SERVICES 0.00 25,822.58 0.00 0% TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40,890.45 206,113.33 117,292.00 176% I PLANNING & ZONING 10-5601 REGULAR SALARIES 11,953.41 53,642.51 50,328.00 107% I 10-5602 O.T SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5603 PART TIME SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-5606 FICA CITY SHARE 877 . 70 3,748.07 3,850.00 97% 10-5607 PERA Cln SHARE 535.52 2,403.22 2,255.00 107% 10-S608 INS. CITY SHARE 680.13 4,690.52 4,718.00 99% I 10-5609 MEDICARE CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5623 MAl NT-EQUIPMENT 285.00 707.60 800.00 89% 10-5626 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 12.20 209.76 350.00 60% 10-5635 CONTRACTUAL 200.00 1,350.00 3,600.00 38% I 10-5636 COMMUNICATION 15.14 382.42 500.00 77% 10-5637 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 30.64 3,371.53 2,250.00 150% 10-5638 PRINT /PUBLISH 0.00 0.00 400.00 0% I 10-5653 SUBSCRIP-MEMBER 0.00 239.00 385.00 62% 10-5662 MACHINERY-EQUIP 0.00 424.00 600.00 71% 10-5663 OTHER IMPROVE 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0% 10-5665 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 150.00 0% I TOTAL PLANNING & IONI NG 14,589.74 71,168.63 76,186.00 93% I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME. 05'55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I ---.....--------- ------...------ ----..----... ---------... ------------------ MuNICIPAL 8LDG-CITY HALL I 10-5723 MAl NT-EQUIPMENT 2,524.01-CR 4,291. 67 2,100.00 204% 10-5724 MAINT -BuILDINGS 268.71 2,090.66 2,000.00 105% I 10-5726 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 102.72 2,556.28 3,500.00 73% 10-5735 CONTRACTUAL 494.10 3,053.90 4,400.00 69% 10-5736 COMMUNICA TI ON 402.33 4,965.96 5,000.00 99% I 10-5739 UTILITIES-GAS/ELEC 679.09 8,123.40 8,000.00 102% 10-5741 INS-TOTAL 38,089.00 61,366.00 66,000.00 93~ 10-5743 MISC. SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-5750 RENTAL 10.00 457.00 400.00 114j; I 10-5752 LICENSES- TAXES 0.00 4,045.53 ,\,500.00 116% 10-5i02 r1ACHINERY-EQUIP 552.00 975.00-CR 4,500.00 22% lO-Sh3 OTHER j,)ROVE 0.00 JlCCd bL' 10;000.uo 5H .. ~ I 10-570] ~UPN It FIXTUP,ES 0.00 u.uo 0.00 0% TOTAL .1UNICIPHL 109,400.00 on 8LDG-CITY HALL 38,0;':' .,'1 95)645.02 I TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 130,726.40 690,252.11 657,144.!)0 105% PUBLIC SAP E T I I POLICE PROTECTION I 10-5823 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 500.00 0% 10-5835 CONTHCTUAL 0.00 308,102.16 368,102.00 100), 10-5839 UTILITIES-GAS/ELEC 2.91 29.11 50.00 58'0 10-5843 MISC. SERVICES 2,581.64 14,926.48 12,000.00 124% I 10-5862 MACHINERY-EQUIP 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 100% TOTAL POLlCE PRO J ECTION 4,084.55 384,557.75 382,152.00 101% I FIRE PROT ECTI ON I 10-5935 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 88,527.00 88,527.00 100% 10-5939 UTILITIES-GAS/ELEC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 88,527.00 88,527.00 100% I PROTECTIVE I NSPECTI ON I 10-6001 REGULAR SALARIES 6,345.34 42,597.74 51,170.00 83% 10-6006 FICA CITY SHARE 452.62 2,933.18 3,915.00 i5% 10-6007 PERA CITY SHARE 284.27 1,908.45 2,292.00 83% I 10-6008 INS. CITY SHARE 332.88 3,845.96 5,202.00 74% 10-6009 MEDICARE CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 (le", 10-6023 MAINT-EQUIPNENT 285.00 365.00 450.00 81% 10-b026 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 195.66 500.00 39% I 10-6035 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-6037 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 111.19 1,588.93 2,250.00 71% 10-6038 PRINT /PU8LISH 0.00 0.00 200.00 0% I 10-6043 MISC. SERVICES 1,911.75 12,354.00 15,000.00 82% 10-6044 OTHER StRVICES 0.00 2,OuO.00 2,000.00 100% 10-6053 SUBSCRIP-MEM8ER 0.00 75.00 100.00 75% I 10-6054 STATE SURCHGS 0.00 7,)94.13 8,000.00 92% DATE 12/31/91 TIME il5:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 6 I NUMBER ACCOUNT ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -----...---...---- ------------- ---------- -...--....---- ------------------ I 10-6062 MACHINERY-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-6065 FURN & FIXTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL PROTECTIVE INSPECTiON 9,723.05 75,258.05 91,079.00 87" I ,J '0 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 13,807.60 548,342.80 561,758.00 98% I PU 8 LI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE I 10-6101 REGULAR SALARIES 15,655.43 'jl,274.33 82,4J5.00 111 % 10-6102 O. T. SALARIES 0.00 129.57 0.)0 u% I 10-6103 PART TIME SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-6106 FICA CITY Sri':,. E ' j- - - c 6,867 .90 0,:;')6.00 109% 1, .0.). i f 10-0107 PERA CI Tr SHARE 701.36 4, (l94. 84 3,693.00 liP, I 10-6108 iNS. CITY SHARE 915.43 8,386.LS 8,517.0U 99% iO-6109 MEDICARE CITY S-iARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 O~, 10-b121 MOTOR FUEL 11 LUBE 3,138.32 11,910.97 13,000.00 92% 10-6122 SMALL TOOLS 0.00 784.71 1,000.00 79% I 10-6123 11iLn -EQUIPMENT 4,989.13 .1.5,725.71 10"m.00 152% 10-6126 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 1,598.43 b,920.S8 7,500.UO 92~o 10-6135 CONfRACTUAL 819.45 1,640.96 1,500.00 109~ I 10-6136 COMMUNICATION 63.22 596.97 1,200.00 50% 10-6137 TRAVEL , CONF, SCH 0.00 260.00 750.00 35?~ 10-6138 PRINT !PU8LISH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-6150 RENTAL 22.50 226.50 1,000..)0 23% 10-6152 LlCENSES- TAxES 0.00 434.72 1,000.00 443. 10-6153 SUBSCRIP-MEMBER 0.00 20.00 50.00 40% 10-6161 BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 O?~ I 10-6162 MACHINERY-EQUIP 0.00 5,800.00 61,000.00 10% 10-6163 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL PU8LIC WORKS SERVICE 29,087.04 155,073.89 214,276.00 i2% I GARAGE 10-6223 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,316.44 1,000.00 132% I 10-6224 MAINT -BUILDI NGS 330.05 683.03 2,000.00 34% 10-6226 GENERAL SUPPLl ES 0.00 202.83 150.00 135% I 10-6235 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 3,215.34 4,500.00 72% 10-6239 UTILITIES-GAS/ELEC 823.00 3,903.53 7,500.00 52% 10-6243 MISC. SERVICES 59.49 64.88 200.00 32% I 10-6263 OTHER IMPROVE 600.00 15,730.65 10,000.00 157% TOTAL GARAGE 1,812.54 25,116.70 25,350.00 99% I STREETS & HIGHWAYS 10-6301 REGULAR SALARIES 2,484.43 55,895.91 64,055.00 87% I 10-6302 O. T. SALARIES 0.00 115.00 500.00 ')7?, ~~o 10-6303 PART TIME SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-6306 FICA CITY SHARE 184.69 4,151.85 4,938.00 84% I 10-6307 PERA CITY SHARE Ill. 30 2,509.27 2,892.00 87% 10-6308 INS. CITY SHARE 166.02 5,312.04 6,737.00 79:, 10-6309 MEDICARE Cln SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I I DATE 12/31/91 TIMt 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE A,'ID EXPENSE REPORT PAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMTBuDGETED PERCENT I -------------- ------------- ---------.. -..----....-- --------..----.... - - 10-6326 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 734.34 16,539.61 62,000.00 27% I 10-6335 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 10-6337 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH. 0.00 30.00 100.00 30% 10-6343 MISC. SERVICES 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100* 10-6362 MACHINERY-EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 \).00 O~ I 10-6303 ulHER IMPROVE 66.00 6,979.85 200,000.00 4% TOTAL STREETS & HIGHwAYS 3,746.78 93,533.53 343,222.00 27% I SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 10-6401 REGULAR SALARIES 4,395.50 17,609.68 12,811.00 138;~ I 10-6402 O. T SALARIES 2,940.70 1,275.64 5,000.00 I 46~; 10-6406 FICA CITY SHARE 548.68 1,857.55 1,362.00 136'% 10-640) r'~i';H CI TY ShARE 328.05 1,114.84 798 . 00 140:~ I 10-640;3 HiS. em SHARE 495.10 2)356.58 1,346.00 17 5~, 10-6420 GEHERRL SuPPLIES 1,016.11 lL',S49.98 13,000.00 95:'0 I TOTAL SNOw & ICE REMOVAL 12,724,74 42,504.27 34,317.00 124% TRAFFIC CONi"jL/S iR LGiQ I 10-6523 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 0.00 367.77 1,000.00 37% 10-6526 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 1,341.71 3,059.32 4,000.00 77% 10-6539 UTILITIES-GASiELEC 305.45 2,102.25 2,500.00 84% I 10-6543 MISC. SERVICES 1,9iS.83 20,370.89 27,000.00 75?, TOTAL TRAFt IC CONTROL/STR LGTS 3,622.99 25,900.23 34,500.00 75% I SANIT , WASTE i~MVL & WEEDS 10-6701 REGULAR SALARIES 49.36 592.32 5,124.00 12% I 10-6702 O.T SAURI ES 101.81 647.97 1,000.00 65% 10-6706 FICA CITY SHARE 11. 21 92.85 468.00 20% 10-6707 PERA CITY SHARE 6.78 55.57 204.00 27% I 10-6708 INS. CITY SHARE 8.45 118.80 541. 00 22% 10-6735 CONTRACTUAL 0.00 687.45 87,300.00 1% 10-6743 MISC. SERVICES 0.00 3,320.00 3,000.00 111% I TOTAL SANIT , WASTE RMVL & WEED 177.61 5,514.96 97,637.00 6% TREE MAINTENANCE I 10-6801 REGULAR SALARIES 93.84 10,953.70 10,249.00 107% 10-6802 O. r SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 10-6806 FICA CITY SHARE 7.18 809.13 784.00 103% 10-6807 PERA CITY SHARE 4.21 490.71 459.00 101% 10-6808 INS. CITY SHARE 0,00 1,066.58 1,076.00 99% 10-6826 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 16.15 100.00 16% I 10-6835 CONTRACTUAL 595.00 11 ,331.10 10,000.00 113% 10-6837 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 0.00 5.00 100.00 S% I TOTAL TREE MAl NTENAHCE 700.23 24,672.37 22,768.00 108% 772,070.00 48% TOTAL PU8LI C WORKS 51,871.93 372,375.95 I DATE 12/31/91 TIME- 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPOHT PAGE 8 I ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -....----------- ------------- ---------- .....-------- ------------------ I CULTURE & RECREATION PARKS & RECREATION I 10-0901 REGULAR SALARIES 7,115.04 55,259.40 47,948.00 115% 10-6902 O.T SALARIES 37.02 244.42 500.00 49% I 10-6903 PART TIME SALARIES 1,677 .01 11,215.16 18,000.00 62% 10-6906 FICA CITY SHARE 671.85 4,323.17 3,706.00 117% 10-6907 PERA CITY SHARE 323.12 2,486.87 2,170.00 115% I 10-0908 INS. CITY SHARE 107.72 4,506.94 5, 177 . 00 87% 10-6909 MEDICARE C 1 j "I' SHARE 0.00 105.47 261.00 40% 10-6922 SMALL TOOLS 0.00 238.28 150.00 159% 10-6923 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 300.04 1,714.25 2,000.00 86% I 10-0924 MAINT -3UILDIiiGS 286.71 2,274.65 1,500.00 152% lO"'c926 ijEHERAL SUPPLIES G.IJ0 10s045.15 15,000.00 7Po 10-0933 ENGINEdING SERVICES 5,655. H-CR I,U/S.25 0.00 O~o I 10-0934 PLANNING 5,386.46 10,573.20 5,000.00 212~ 10-6935 CONTRACTUAL 150.00 7,159.85 10,000.00 72% 10-6936 COMMUNICATION 0.00 Bo.78-CR 1,200.00 7% I 10-6937 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 0.00 10.94 300.00 4% 10-6938 PRINT /PUBLISH 131.80 624.95 600.00 104% 10-0939 UTllITIES-GRS/ELEe 364.19 1,048.48 2,000.00 82% 10-6943 MISC. SERVICES v.OO 0.04 600.00 0% I 10-6950 RENTAL 582.46 2,944.02 4,500.00 65% 10-6953 SUBSCRIP-MEMBER 0.00 0.00 250.00 0" ., 10-6"62 MACHINERY-EQUIP 0.00 17 , 100.00 19,500.00 88% I 10-6963 OTHER IMPROVE 0.00 8,104.55 8,150.00 99% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 11,538.23 142,168.32 148,512.00 96% TOTAL CULTURE & RECREATION 11,538.23 142,168.32 148,512.00 96% I CAPITAL OUTLAY I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 10-7064 FUTURE 0.00 0.00 163,112.00 0% I TOTAL CAP IT AL IMPROVtMENT 0.00 0.00 163,112.00 0% TOTAL CAP IT AL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 163, 112.00 0% I U i'lALLOCA TED I 10-7080 INSURANCE UNALLOCA TED 43.82-CR 43.82-CR 0.00 0% 10-7081 FICA UNALLOCATED 72. 58 -CR 179.45-CR 0.00 0% 10-7082 PERA UNALLOCATED 45.33-CR 14.38-CR 0.00 0% I 10-7084 MEDICARE UNALLOCATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL UNALLOCATED 161. 73- 237.65- 0.00 0% I MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES 10-7143 CONTI NGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME' 05:55 ACCOUNT NUM8ER 10-9101 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 9 MTO ACTUAL YTO ACTUAL TOTAL AMT 8UDGETED PERCENT "-------...- ---------- ------..---..--...---- 161.73- 237.65- 0.00 0% 207,782.43 1,752,901.53 2,302 I 596. ')0 76% 813,674.64 484,813.90 0.00 O~l TOTAL UNALLoe & MIse EXPENDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET REV/EXPEND 8EFORE TFRS INTERFUND TRANSFERS TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANS~ERS 510,712.00 510,712.00 O.vo 050 510,712.00 510,712.00 0.00 0% 302,902.64 25,898.10- 0.00 O~6 NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES DATE 12/31/91 TIM~ 05:55 CITY OF SHORcWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNT NUM8ER ACCOUNT TITlE YTD ACTUAL MTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED FUND # 40 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVENUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 40-4186 40-4187 40-4752 SA CURRENT/COUNTY DELINQ SA/COUNTY SA PREPAYS 60,160.85 CR 115,155.95 CR 0.00 0% 6,816.29 CR 12,130.78 CR 0.00 0% 0.00 11,827 .61 CR 0.00 0% 66,977.14 139,114.34 0.00 0% TOT~L SPECIAL ASSES5MENTS INTERFUNO TRANSFERS 40-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 O~, 0.00 ILOO 0.00 0% 60,977.14 139,114.34 0.00 In TOTAL INTERFUND TRAN~rERS TOTAL REVENUE EXPE:WI TURES TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0,00 OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE 40-8512 'iO -8545 9,893.37 eR 25,198.64 CR 0.00 0% 0.00 57.55 0.00 0% 9,893.37 25,141.09 0.00 0% INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES TOTAL OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE INTERFUND TRANSFERS 40-9101 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 9,893.37- 25,141.09- 0.00 0% 76,870.51 164,2')5.43 0.00 0% TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INfERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL OTHER INC/EXP & TFRS NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES PAGE 10 I PERCENT O~, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 ACCOUNT NUM8ER 41-4706 41-4770 41-4772 4J -4887 41-7415 41-7416 41-7430 4l-7433 41-7443 41-8512 41-8545 IIMt 05:55 CITY OF SHoREWooD REVENUE HND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 11 ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT 8UDGETtD PERCENT FUND # 41 PARK CAPITAL IMP REVENUE FEES & DONATIONS DIVISION FEES PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT DONATIONS SHOREWOOD PIN DONATIONS 0.00 18,750.00 CR 0.00 0% 0.00 50.00 CR 0.00 0% 0,00 20,00 CR 0,00 0% 0.00 18,820,00 0.00 0;, TOTAL FEES & DONAfIONS INTERFuND TRANSFERS fRANSFERS FROM DTHER FUNDS O.uo 0.00 0,00 1);0 0.00 0.00 0,00 Dt 0.00 18,820,00 0.00 O~o TOTAL INTERFUND TRAiSFERS TOTAL REvENUE EXPENDITURES PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PARKS-MAJOR iMPROVEMENTS WALK & BIKE TRAIL-MAJOR iMP LEGAL ENGINEER/PROF StRVICES MISC. CONTRACTUAL 1,048.00 2,705.85 0.00 O~~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 1,048.00 2,705.85 0.00 0% TOTAL PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 637.21 CR 1,698.55 CR 0.00 0" '0 0.00 2.75 0.00 0% 637.21 1,695.80 0.00 0% 410.79 1,010.05 0.00 0% 410.79- 17,809.95 0.00 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES --- ------.-.----- REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 12 I MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT 8UDGETED PERCENT ---------- ....-------- ------------------ I I 105,000.00 CR 0.00 I 105,000.00 CR 0% 105,000.00 105,000.00 0.00 0% I 105,000.00 105,000.00 0.00 00. " I I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 105,000.00 105,000.00 0.00 0% I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIMe 05:55 CITY OF SHOR[~OOO ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE FUND # 42 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REVENUE INTER FUND TRANSFERS 42-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES PROJECT EXPENDITURES 42-7338 42-7362 PRINT /PU8LISH MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT TOTAL PROJECT ExPENDITURES OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 42-8512 '12 -8545 INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT INTERFUND TRANSFERS 42-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENDITURES DATE 12/31/91 rIME" 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL REVENUE A~D EXPENSE REPORT YTD ACTUAL FUND # 46 WATRFRD III/TIF DST ~1 :iEvENUE PROJECT REVENUE 46-4781 46-4782 46-4784 BOND PROCEEDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 CR TOTAL PROJECT REVENUE 7,500.00 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 46-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 12,000.00 CR TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 12,000.00 TOTAL REvENUE 19,500.00 EXPENDITURES TIF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 46-7305 46-7330 46-7333 46-7334 46-7335 46-7338 46-7343 ADMINISTRATIVE & OFFICE EXPENSE ATTORNEY FEES ENGINEERING FEES CONSULTING FEES CONTRACTUAL-CONSTRUCTION PRINTING & PUBLISHING MISC CONTRACTUAL 0.00 2B5.00 49,257.57 0.00 74,755.97 0.00 3,401. 91 TOTAL TIF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 127,700.45 OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 46-8512 46-B545 INTEREST EARNINGS SERVICE CHARGES 9,136.80 CR 0.00 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 9,136.80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 46-9101 0.00 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND iRANSFERS 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 118,563.65 NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 99,063.65- 920,000.00 CR 0.00 7,500.00 CR 927,500.00 12,000.00 Lk 12,000.00 939,500.00 0.00 24,690.40 179,816.84 33,544.01 698,152.17 305.20 3,551.91 940,060.53 31,320.36 CR 0.00 31,320.36 0.00 0.00 908,740.17 30,759.83 TOTAL AMT BUDGETED 920,000.00 CR 0.00 0.00 920,0)0.00 0.00 0.00 920,VOO.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 920,000.00 PAGE 14 PERCENT 100% 0% 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iOl% O~6 ":;0 102% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% I DATE 12/31/91 TIME" 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I -------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ SE WATER TREATMENT PLANT I REVENUE PROJECT REVENUE I 47-4781 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 431,700.00 CR 0.00 0% 47-4784 MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL PROJECT REVENUE 0.00 431,700.00 0.00 0:, INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 47-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TurAL INTERFUND TR~NSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL REVENUE 0.00 431,700.00 0.00 0% I EXPENDITURES I PROJECT EXPENDITURES 47-7305 ADMINISTRATIVE & OFFICE EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 47-7330 ATTOiiNEY FEES 1,752.78 2,552.78 0.00 0% 47-7333 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 33,196.33 0.00 o~, 47-7334 CONSULTING FEESD 0.00 8,547.27 0.00 0% I 47-7335 CONTRACTUAL-CONSTRUCTION 59,073.85 325,071.28 0.00 0% 47-7338 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 0.00 548.38 0.00 0% 47-7343 MISC CONTRACTUAL 1,054.98 1,054.98 0.00 0% I TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 61,881.61 370,971.02 0.00 0% OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES I 47-8512 INTEREST EARNINGS 458.49 CR 458.49 CR 0.00 0% 47-8545 SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 458.49- 458.49- 0.00 0% INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 47-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 61,423.12 370,512.53 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 61,423.12- 61,187.47 0.00 (i'/ , , I I DATE 12;'31;'91 TIM~ 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 16 I ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -------------- ------------- ------ -.._- ---------- ------------------ I FUND # 48 PINE BEND WATERMAIN ;{EVENUE I PROJECT REVENUE I 48-4781 BOND PROCEEDS 71 ,265.00 CR 0.00 0% 0.00 4;]-4784 i1ISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL PROJECT REVENUE 0.00 71,265.00 0.00 0% INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 48-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 75,600.00 CR 75,600.00 CR 0.00 0% TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 75,600.00 75,600.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 75,600.00 146,865.00 0.00 0% I EXPENDlTURiS PROJECT EXPENDITURES I 48-7305 ADMINISTRATIVE & OFFICE EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 48-7330 A I iORNEY FEES 649.73 829.73 0.00 0% 48-7333 ENGINEERING FEES 7,205.53 19,303.48 0.00 0% 48-7334 CONSULT I NG FEES 0.00 1,300.67 0.00 0% 48-7335 CONTRACTUAL-CONSTRUCTION 3,924.91 78,498.22 0.00 0% I 48 -7338 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 0.00 323.96 0.00 0% 48-7343 MISC CONTRACTUAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 11,780.17 100,256.06 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES I 48-8512 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 48-8545 SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 48-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 :' (\() 0% I .:.',).... TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,780.17 100,256.06 0.00 0% NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 63,819.83 46,608.94 0.00 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIM~ 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL REVENUE ~ND EXPENSE REPORT YTD ACTUAL FUND ~ 49 CHURCH ROAD IMPS REVENUE PROJECT REVENUE 49-4781 49-4784 BOND PROCEEDS MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 TDTAL PROJECT REVENUE 0.00 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49-4887 TRANS~ERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 TOT~L INIERFUNO TRANSFERS 0.00 TOTAL REVENUE 0.00 E;;PENDITURES PROJECT EXPENDITURES 49-7305 49-7330 49-7333 49-7334 49-7335 49-7338 49-7343 ADMINISTRATIVE & OFFICE EXPENSE A TrORNEY f: as ENGINEERING FEES CONSUL TING FEES CONTRACTUAL-CONSTRUCTION PRINTING & PUBLISHING MISC CONTRACTUAL 0.00 762.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 762.08 OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 49-8512 49-8545 INTEREST EARNINGS SERVICE CHARGES 1,198.76 CR 0.00 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 1,198.76 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 436.68- NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 436.68 177,200.00 CR 0.00 177,200.00 0.00 0.00 177 ,200. 00 0.00 2,153.:28 5,874.51 3,716.20 0.00 239.03 0.00 11 ,983. 02 1,198.76 CR 0.00 1,198.76 0.00 0.00 10,784.26 166,415.74 TOTAL AMT BUDGETED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 17 PERCENT 0% 0:, 0" -0 0:, O~ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% DATE 12/31/91 TIME" 05:55 CITY OF SHOREwOOD ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL REVENUE ~ND EXPENSE REPORT YTD ACTUAL FUND # 50 SHADY HILLS STORM SWR REVENUE PROJECT REVENUE 50-4781 'iO-4784 BONO PROCEEDS MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT REVENUE 0.00 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 50-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 TOTAL INTERFU~O TRANSFERS 0.00 TOTAL REVENUE 0.00 EXPENDITURES PROJECT EXPENDITURES 50-7305 50-7330 50-7333 50-7334 50-7335 50-7338 50-7343 ADMINISTRATIVE & OFFICE EXPENSE Ai fORNE)' FEES ENGINEERING FEES CO:~SULT I NG FEES CONTRACTUAL-CONSTRUCTION PRINTING & PUBLISHING MISC CONTRACTUAL 0.00 100.00 1,610.93 0.00 421. 00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 2,131.93 OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 50-8512 50-8545 INTEREST EARNINGS SERVICE CHARGES 96.40 CR 0.00 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 96.40 INTERFUND TRANSF~RS 50-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,035.53 NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 2,035.53- 31,000.00 CR 0.00 31,000.00 0.00 0.00 31,000.00 0.00 1,343.00 11 ,583.85 375.00 8,420.00 182.14 0.00 21,903.99 211. 85 CR 0.00 211.85 0.00 0.00 21,692.14 9,307.86 TOTAL AMT BUDGETED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PERCENT 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% O~ 70 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0', '0 0% 0% 0% I DATE 12/31/91 f IME' 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE i,:iD EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I .. _.........4... __............_ --..._--------- ......-..----- ---------- ------------------ FUND 60 WATER UTILlTY # I REVENUE I TAXES 60-4001 SPECIAL LEVY - DEBT 7,172.07 CR 15,209.68 CR 16,325.00 CR 93% I 60-4005 FISUL DISPARITIES ~56.~4 CR 695.19 CR 0.00 0% 60-4050 HAC A 645.58 CR 1,220.09 CR 0.00 0% TO Ti~L TAXES 8,113.99 17,124.96 16,325.00 105% I CHARGES FOR SERVICE I 60-4702 SPE(I,~L LEVy DEBT 0.00 0.00 0.00 OJ, 60-4704 wA TER CITY CONNECTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 60-4705 SALE OF MET ERS i/5.00 CR 7,059.00 CR 7,500.00 eR 9a% I 60-4706 WA TER SALES ~6,006.42 CR 145,011.44 CR 11 0,000. 00 CR 132% 60-4711 WA TER INT EARNED 1,950.02 CR 4,72~.11 CR 200.00 CR ~62% 60-4712 WA T ER -(OUriTY COLLEC 1,571.87 CR 4,076.44 CR 5,600.00 CR 7 3~; 60-4713 WATER PERMITS 25.00 CR 2,240.00 CR 1,500.00 CR 149% I 60-4717 ANT HNAE SPACE RENTAL 600.00 CR 6,600.00 CR 7,200.00 CR 92% 60-4718 WTR HOOKUP-BLDR ERG 1,545.10- 19,316.49 CR 0.00 0% I TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE S8,18,S.21 189,026.48 132,000.00 143% INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 60-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL iNTERFUND TRANSFERS O. ijO 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 46,957.20 206,151.44 148,325.00 139% I EXPENSES I OPERATING EXPENSES 60-8001 REGULAR SALARIES 392.37 4,350.84 7,000.00 62% 60-8002 O. T. SALARIES l8.45-CR 0.00 0.00 0% I 60-8006 FICA SALARIES 29.19 318.94 560.00 57% 60-8007 PERA CITY SHARE 17.58 194.93 300.00 65% 60-8008 IriS. CITY SHARE 19.01 377.78 600.00 63% I 60-8020 OFF I CE SUPPLI ES 85.65 1,143.80 750.00 153% 60-8023 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 1,093.80 13,017.57 10,000.00 130% 60-8024 MAl NT -BUILDH1GS 0.00 188.00 1,000.00 19% 60-8025 DEPRECIATION 56,586.00 56,586.00 0.00 Oi, I 60-8026 GENERAL SUPPLI ES 1,252.71 11 , 096.94 12,000.00 93% 60-8031 PI NANCIAL 0.00 84.91 300.00 28% 60-8032 AUD IT 0.00 617.20 tOO.OO l03j, I 60-8033 ENGINEERING 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0% 60-8035 CONTRACTUAL 3,818.75 51,166.07 35,000.00 14650 1,200.00 .~')~' 60-8036 COMMUNICATION 154.84 1,098.40 /_ 0 60-8041 INSURANCE-TOTAL 923.00 4,811.34 5,000.00 96% I DATE 12/31/91 TIM~ 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 60-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0,00 9.19 0.00 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT> PAGE 20 MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT ---------- ---------- ------------------ 0.00 0.00 300.00 0?6 96.07-CR 244.25 500.00 49% 0.00 120.00 0.00 0% 327 . 30 1,345.'20 800.00 168% 0.00 6,850.05 5,000.00 13i% 0.00 3,364.34 3,500.00 96% 265.85 5,133.53 10,000.00 51% 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100% 0.00 6,485.00 6,500.00 100% 742.82 4,811.28 5,000.00 96% 443.33 6,780.33-CR 5,000.00 136% 474.00 4,205.76 5,000.00 84% 324.20 1,448.43 3,000.00 48% 1,204.01 9,012.03 10,000.00 90% 58.88 618.20 1,500.00 4P; b8, 068. i7 191,910.46 142,910.1)0 134~i ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE 60-8043 60-8052 60-8063 60-8084 60-8085 60-80B6 60-808i 60-8092 60-8093 60-8094 60-8095 60-8096 60-8097 60-8098 60-8099 MISC. SERVICES LICENSES-TAXES/SALE OTHER IMPROVE WTR PURCH-TONKA BAY WTR PURCH-EXCELSIOR WTR PURCII-MTKA PURCH WATER METERS WATER BOND PRINCIPAL WATER BOND INTEREST AMESBURY/UTILITIES BADGER/UTILITIES BOULDER BRIDGE UTIL WOODHAVEN UTILITIES S E AREA UTILITIES WATER TOWER UTILITIES OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSES TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSES 0.00 9,19 0.00 0% INTER FUND TRANSFERS NET REVENUE/EXPENSES 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 00, " 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 0% 88,068.77 211,919.65 142,910.00 148% 41,111.57- 5,768.21- 5,415.00 107% 60-9101 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENSES I DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PHGE 21 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I -.-----..------ --.....-.....------ --------..- ---------- ------------------ FUND # 61 SEWER UTILITY I REVENUE I CHARGES FOR SERVICE 61-4721 SEWER PERMITS 300.00 CR 6,500.00 CR 6,000.00 CR 108% I 61-4724 SEWER SERV CHARGES 130,538.88 CR 445,119.11 CR 415,000.00 CR 107% 61-4726 SEWER INT EARNED 14,946.31 CR 38,394.61 CR 18,000.00 CR 213% 61-4727 SEWER CHG-CNTY COLL 12,058.86 CR 28,877.83 CR 30,000.00 CR 96% I 61-4728 REFUNDS/REIMBURSE 0.00 157.31 CR 0.00 0% 61-4729 METRO SAC CHARGES 1,950.00 CR 43,200.00 CR 39,000.00 CR 111% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 159,794.05 562,248.86 508,000.00 111% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 61-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL INTEHfUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 o 00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 159,794.05 562,248.86 508,000.00 111% I EXPENSES OPERATING EXPENSES I 61-8201 REGULAR SALARIES 1,428.93 10,127.27 7,000.00 145% 61-8202 O. I SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 61-8206 FICA CITY SHARE 105.02 701.62 560.00 125% I 61-8207 PERA CITY SHARE 64.05 453.84 300.00 151% 61-8208 INS. CITY SHARE 96.74 947.26 600.00 158% 61 -8220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 1,632.68 1,000.00 163% I 61-8221 MOTOR FUEL & LUBE 0.00 0.00 200.00 0% 61-8222 SMALL TOOLS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 61-8223 MAINT-EQUIPMENT 1,723.00 4,834.24 7,500.00 65% I 61-8224 MAINI-BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 61-8225 DEPRECIATION 175,628.00 175,628.00 0.00 0% 61-8226 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 500.00 0% 61-8231 FINANCIAL 0.00 84.91 300.00 28% I 61-8232 AUDIT 0.00 617 . 20 600.00 103% 61-8233 ENGINEERING 261.63 6,463.77 3,000.00 216% 61-8235 CONTRACTUAL 47,361.25-CR 37,464.11 75,000.00 50% I 61-8237 TRAVEL, CONF, SCH 0.00 187.40 0.00 0% 61-8239 UTILITIES-GAS/ELEC 959.14 4,054.03 6,000.00 68% 61-8241 INSURANCE-TOTAL 694.16 3,545.82 3,500.00 101% 61-8243 MISC. SERVICES 0.00 252.00 500.00 ....<,x I ..J'.;I) 61-8262 MACHINERY-EQUIP 52,155.00 52,667.50 40,000.00 132% 618263 OTHER IMPROVE 0.00 180.00 0.00 0% 61-8284 METRO SAC CHARGES 727.50 40,625.50 38,610.00 105% I 61-8285 EXCELSIOR SEWER CHARGE 1,536.::' 14,058.80 0.;0 0% 61-8286 METRO SERVICE CHARGE 0.00 307,116.00 307,111.00 100% I TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 188,067.92 661,641. 95 492,281.00 134% DATE 12/31/91 TIME' 05:55 ACCOUNT NUMBER 61-8545 61-9101 CITY OF SliOREWOOD ACCOUNT TIi LE REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PAGE 22 PERCENT OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSE INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSE INTERFUND TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 96.42 96.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% v.oo 0.00 0.00 0% 188,067.92 661,738.37 492,281. 00 134% 28,273.87- 99,489.51- 15,719.00 633% NET REVENUE/EXPENSE 0% 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME' 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MID ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I -----------..-- ------------- ------.......- ---------- -------------- ._-- FUND # 62 RECYCLI NG I REVENUE I OPERATING REVENUE 62-4057 COUNTY RECYCLING AID 0.00 50,599.84 CR 0.00 0% I 62-4115 RECYCLING SERVICE CHARGtS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-4116 CITY CLEAN-UP 17.10 CR 7,480.73 CR 0.00 0% 62-4120 RECYCLI~G PROCEEDS FROM CONTRACTOR 720.62 CR 4,944.35 CR 0.00 0% I TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 737.72 63,024.92 0.00 0% INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 62-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL INTtRFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 737.72 63,024.92 0.00 0% I EXPENSES OPERATING EXPENSES I 62-8401 REGULAR SALARIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-B406 FICA CITY SH!)RE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 62-8407 PERA CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-8408 INSURANCE CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-8409 MEDICARE CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-8420 OFF I CE SUPPLI ES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 62-8426 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 62-8435 CONTRACTUAL 8,550.00 58,520.80 0.00 0% 62-8438 PRINT /PUBLISH 0.00 59.09 0.00 0% I 62-8443 MISC. EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 8,550.00 58,579.89 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSE 62-8512 INTEREST INCOME 144.17 CR 491.68 CR 0.00 0% I 62-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.08 0.00 0% 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENSE 144.17 491. 60 0.00 I TOTAL EXPENSES 8,405.83 58,088.29 0.00 0% NET REVENUE/EXPENSE 7,668.11- 4,936.63 0.00 0% I I I CITY OF SHOREwOOD PAGE I INCOME STATEMENT DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:54 ----CURRENT PERIOD---- ----yEAR TO DAiE---- NET I AMOUNT PCT. AMOUNT PCT. BUDGET BALANCE FUND # 71 LIQUOR STORE I I SALES I LIQUOR SALES 177,603.17- 18,285.83 31.42 177 ,603. 17 29.27 0.00 WINE SALES 13,008.18 22.35 88,558.65 14.59 0.00 88,558.65- I BEER SALES 24,078.81 41. 38 306,562.64 50.52 0.00 306,562.64- MISC SALES 2,812.87 4.83 34,278.09 5.65 0.00 34,278.09- BOTTLE DEPOSITS 6.28 .01 157.69- .03- 0.00 157.69 rOTAL SALES 58,191.97 100.00 606,844.86 100.00 0.00 606,844.86- I COST OF GOODS SOLD I LIQUOR PURCHASES 16,976.93 29.17 146,957.00 24.22 0.00 146,957.00- wINE PURCHASES 4,542.99 7.81 58,982.31 9.72 0.00 58,982.31- 8EER PURCHASES 36,627.10 62.94 242,149.76 39.90 0.00 242,149.76- I MISC PURCHASES 4,113.64 7.07 27,030.66 4.45 0.00 27,030.66- TOTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD 62,260.66 106.99 475,119.73 78.29 0.00 475,119.73- I GROSS PROFIT 4,068.69- 6.99- 131,725.13 21. 71 0.00 131,725.13- EXPENSES I PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 3,422.12 5.88 26,885.05 4.43 0.00 26,885.05- I PART TIME SALARIES 2,403.29 4.13 17,924.57 2.95 0.00 17,924.57- FICA CITY SHARE 445.35 .77 2,974.70 .49 0.00 2,974.70- I PERA CITY SHARE 195.13 .34 1,481.31 .24 0.00 1,481.31- INS. CITY SHARE 172.21 .30 1,735.52 .29 0.00 1,735.52- MEDICARE CITY SHARE 0.00 .00 76.52 .01 0.00 76.52- I TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,638.10 11.41 51,077.67 8.42 0.00 51,077.67- SUPPLIES I OFFICE EXP/POSTAGE 21. 55 .04 121.15 .02 0.00 121.15- REPAIRS AND MAINT 51. 00 .09 984.95 .16 0.00 984.95- I SUPPLIES-GENERAL 89.84 .15 626.22 .10 0.00 626.22- TOTAL SUPPLIES 162.39 .28 1,732.32 .29 0.00 1,732.32- I OTHER CHARGES FINANCIAL PROF SVCS 0.00 .00 194.08 .03 0.00 194.08- I AUDIT PROF SVCS 0.00 .00 925.80 .15 0.00 925.80- CONTRACTUAL 0.00 .00 1,650.99 .27 0.00 1,650.99- MTGS SCHOOLS MILEAGE 0.00 .00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 I UTILITIES 478.61 .82 4,792.72 .79 0.00 4,792.72- INSURANCE EXPENSE 2,413.84 4.15 6,678.00 1.10 0.00 6,678.00- BAD DEBT EXPS 3.00 .01 251. 53 .04 0.00 251. 53- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ilENT LI C /T AX ES DUES & SUBS ADVERTISING & SALES DEPRECIATION EXP. TOTAL OTHER CHARGES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES NET OPERATING INCOME/LOSS OTHER INCOME/EXPENSES INTEREST INCOME MISC INCOME CASH SHORT/OVER LOTTERY TICKET SALES LOTTERY TICKET COSTS LUfTERY TICKET-STATE REIMS. LOTTERY TICKET REDEMPTIONS LOTTERY BANK CHARGES INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES TOTAL ulHER INCOME/EXPENSES INTERFUND TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS NET INCOME/LOSS CITY OF SHOREwOOD INCOME STATEMENT DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:54 ----CURRENT PERIOD---- -u-YE:4R TO DATE---- AMOUNT PCT. AMOUNT PCT. 1,564.00 2.69 19,725.75 3.25 0.00 .00 1,95B.64 .32 0.00 .00 195.00 .03 570.20 .98 2,872.69 .47 0.00 .00 0.00 .00 5,029.65 8.64 39,245.20 6.47 11,830.14 20.33 92,055.19 15.17 15,898.83- 27.32- 39,669.94 6.54 PAGE 2 NET BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 19,725.75- 0.00 1,958.64- 0.00 195.00- 0.00 2,872.69- 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,245.20- 0.00 92,055.19- 0.00 39,669.94- 3,509.25 6.03 9,147.20 1. 51 0.00 9,147.20- 84.00 .14 117 . 00 .02 0.00 117.00- 82.83 .14 507.07 .08 0.00 507.07- 1,001.00 1.72 13,759.00 2.n 0.00 13,759.00- 475.00 .82 10,855.65 1. 79 0.00 10,855.05- 609.00 1. 05 1,530.00 1. 24 0.00 7,530.00- 474 . 00 .81 6,784.00 1.12 0.00 6,784.00- 0.00 .00 20.21 .00 0.00 20.21- 0.00 .00 20.56 .00 0.00 20.56- 4,171.42 7.17 12,365.71 2.04 0.00 12,365.71- 10,000.00 17.18 1. 05 0.00 10,000.00- 10,000.00 10,000.00 17.18 0.00 10,000.00- 10,000.00 1.65 21,727.41- 37.34- 6.93 0.00 42,035.65- 42,035.65 I CITY OF SHOREWOOD PAGE 2 INCOME STATEMtNT DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:54 I '---CURRENT PERIOD---- ----yEAR TO DATE---- NET AMOUNT PCT. AMOUNT PCT. BUDGET BALANCE I INSURANCE EXPENSE 3,526.66 3.95 9,760.00 1.15 0.00 9,760.00- 8AD DEBT EXP 0.00 .00 195.26 .02 0.00 195.26- RENT O.uO .00 25,380.00 2.99 0.00 25,380.00- I LIC/TAXES 0.00 .00 4,533.54 .53 0.00 4,533.54- DUES & SUBS 0.00 .00 195.00 .02 0.00 195.00- ADVERTISING & SALES PROMOTION 570.20 .64 3,325.50 .39 0.00 3,325.50- I DEPRECIATION EXP 617.00 .69 617.00 .07 0.00 617.00- FURNITURE & FIXTURES 425.00 .48 425.00 .05 0.00 425.00- TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 5,591.20 6.26 52,263.99 6.16 0.00 52,263.99- I TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 15,698.58 17.56 131 ,067.30 15.45 0.00 131,067.30- I NET OPERATING iNCOME/LOSS 17,268.39- 19.32- 45,430.00 5.35 0.00 45,430.00- INCOME/EXPENSE OTHER I INTEREST INCOME 3,125.30 3.50 8,064.38 .95 0.00 8,064.38- MISC INCOME 142.00 .16 186.98 .02 0.00 186.98- CASH SHORT/OVER 43.47 .05 349.81 .04 0.00 349.81- I LOTTERY TICKET SALES 2,206.00 2.47 26,963.00 3.18 0.00 26,963.00- LOTTERY TI CK E T COSTS 2,375.00 2.66 25,640.00 3.02 0.00 25,640.00- LOTTERY TICKET-STATE REIMB. 1,639.00 1. 83 15,155.00 1.79 0.00 15,155.00- I LOTTERY TICKET REDEMPTIONS 1,273.00 1.42 15,659.00 1. 85 0.00 15,659.00- LOTTERY BANK CHARGES 0.00 r"\('\ 20.22 .00 0.00 20.22- .'':V INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 .00 17.48 .00 0.00 17.48- I fOTAL OTHER I NCO:1E!EX PENSES 3,420.83 3.83 8,682.85 1.02 0.00 8,682.85- INTERFUND TRANSFERS I TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 15,000.00 16.78 15,000.00 1.77 0.00 15,000.00- I TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 15,000.00 16.78 15,000.00 1.77 0.00 15,000.00- NET INCOME/LOSS 28,847.56- 32.28- 39,112.85 4.61 0.00 39,112.85- I I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME. 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -------------- ------------- ~--------- ---------- ------------------ I FUND # 92 SEWER IMP 71, 72, 72B I REVENUE I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 92-4186 SA CURRENT/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 92-4187 DELINQ SA/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 92-4752 SA PREPAYS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 92-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOT~L INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I f:XPENDITURES DE8T SERVICE I 92 - 7285 MISC ExPENSE 0.00 1. 50 0.00 0% 92 -7286 PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 92-7287 INTEREST AND FEES 250.00 1,680.00 0.00 0% I 92-7288 REFUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 250.00 1,681. 50 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 92-8512 INTEREST INCOME 86.32 CR 309.72 CR 0.00 0% I 92-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 1.04 0.00 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITRE 86.32 308.68 0.00 0% I TOTAL EXPENDITURES 163.68 1,372.82 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 163.68- 1,372.82- 0.00 0% I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TI ME. 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL no ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT I .....-------...---- ~.._-..-------- -----...---- ----...----- ----------- .---..-- FUND # 94 SEWER IMP 1974 I REVENUE I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 94-4186 SA CURRENT/COUNTY 12,940.64 CR 25,096.37 CR 0.00 0% I 94-4187 DELI NQ SA/COUNTY 7,767.80 CR 8,834.10 CR 0.00 0% 94-4188 DEFIC-BOND-DEBL/SPEC LEVY 356.14 CR 370.88 CR 0.00 0% I 94-4752 SA PREPAYS 0.00 8,868.3b CR 0.00 0% TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 21,064.58 43,169.71 0.00 0% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS 94-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 0% TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL REVENUE 21,064.58 43,169.71 0.00 0% I EXPENDI TURES I DEBT SERVICE 94-7286 PRINCIPAL 70,000.00 70,000.00 0.00 0% I 94-7287 INTEREST AND FEES 3,870.00 7,740.00 0.00 0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 73,870.00 77,740.00 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 94-8512 INTEREST INCOME 2,206.59 CR 5,987.72 CR 0.00 0% I 94-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 13.76 0.00 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITRE 2,206.59 5,973.96 0.00 0% I TOTAL EXPENDITURES 71 ,663.41 71,766.04 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 50,598.83- 28,596.33- 0.00 0% I I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIM; 05:55 CITY OF SHoREWooD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ..----..--- I FUN~ # 95 1989 REFUNDING I REVENUE I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 95-4186 SA CURRENT/COUNTY 52,452.41 CR 107,527.43 CR 0.00 0% 95-4187 DELINQ SA/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 95-4752 SA PREPAYS 12,793.07 CR 181,661.51 CR 0.00 0% TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 65,245.48 289,188.94 0.00 0% I INTERFUNo TRANSFERS 95-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I I EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE 95-7285 MISC EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 95-7286 PRINCIPAL 0.00 85,000.00 0.00 0% 95-7287 INTEREST AND FEES 0.00 63,272.58 0.00 0% I TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0.00 148,272. 58 0.00 0% OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES I 95-8512 INTEREST INCOME 16,925.56 CR ", 41,387.93 CR 0.00 0% 95-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 98.56 0.00 0% I TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITRE 16,925.56 41,289.37 0.00 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 82,171.04- 182,205.73- 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 82,171.04 182,205.73 0.00 0% I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 28 . I ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT -- ...---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ FUND # 96 WATRFRD III/TIF DST #1 I REVENUE I TAXES 96-4010 TAX INCREMENT REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS 96-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I EXPENDITURES I DEBT SERVICE 96-7285 MISC EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 96-7286 PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 96-7287 INTEREST & FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 96-7288 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 96-8512 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 96-8545 SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE!EXPENDITRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I INTER FUND TRANSFERS 96-9101 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.0'0 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I I I I I DATE 12(\1/91 TIME 05:55 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 29 . ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCENT ,...------------ ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ I FUND ~ 98 1986 IMPROVEMENTS I REVENUE I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 98-4186 SA CURRENT/COUNTY 21,089.65 CR 41,383.94 CR 0.00 0% 98-4187 DELINQ SA/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I 98-4752 SA PREPAYS 3,351.24 CR 59,705.83 CR 0.00 0% TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 24,440.89 101,089.77 0.00 0% I INTERFUND TRANSFERS I 98-4887 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL INTER FUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL REVENUE 24,440.89 101,089.77 0.00 0% I EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE I 98-7286 PRINCIPAL 0.00 70,000.00 0.00 0% 98-7287 INTEREST AND FEES 0.00 56,030.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0.00 126,030.00 0.00 0% UTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES I 98-8512 INCOME INTEREST 13,159.20 CR 30,055.13 CR 0.00 0% 98-8545 INVESTMENT SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 76.42 0.00 0% I TOTAL OTHER REVENUE!EXPENDITRE 13,159.20 29,978.71 0.00 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,159.20- 96 J 051. 29 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 37,600.09 5,038.48 0.00 0% I I I I I DATE 12/31/91 TIME 05:55 CITI OF SHOREWOOD REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT PAGE 30 . ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE MTD ACTUAL no ACTUAL TOTAL AMT BUDGETED PERCErH I ---------..---.. --_.._..._.._~--- ---...---....- ---------- ---- -....----...------ FUND; 99 1991 PROJ & REfUNDING I REVENUE I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 99-4186 SA CURRENT/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I '19-4187 SA DELINQ/COUNTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 99-4752 SA PREPAYS 5,468.91 CR 32,813.43 CR 0.00 0% 99-4781 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 273,955.16 CR 0.00 0% I TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 5,468.91 306,769.19 0.00 0% INTERfUND TRANSfERS I 99-4887 TRANSfERS fROM OTHER fUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL INTERfUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL REVENUE 5,468.91 306,769.19 0.00 0% I EXPENDITURES I DE8T SERVICE 99-7285 MISC EXPENSE 1,028.81 6,058.70 0.00 0% I 99-7286 PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 99-7287 INTEREST & fEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 1,028.81 6,058.70 0.00 0% I OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDITURES I 99-8512 INTEREST EARNINGS 2,222.44 CR 2,302.37 CR 0.00 0% 99-8545 SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% I TOTAL OTHER REVENUE/EXPENDIT 2,222.44 2,302.37 0.00 0% INTERFUND TRANSfERS I 99-9101 TRANSfERS TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% TOTAL INTERfUND TRANSfERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1'% I TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,193.63- 3,756.33 0.00 0% I NET REVENUE/EXPENDIiURES 6,662.54 303,012.86 0.00 0% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SHOREwOOD 5AL;~NC: SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 10 GE~ERAL FUND ASSETS CURRE!OiT ASSETS CASH ~ INVESTMENTS PETTI' CASH INVESTMENTS HCCRuED INTER::T RECEIV~8LE TAXES REeBLE-cuRRENT TAxES PEC8LE-0ELiGuENT ilK MISC SjA REeBLE DELIQuENT CONTRACTS FOR DEED :\tCEIVABLE ; U ::..jL ~_U~~,r.. ill! H~,::.'t :- TDTAL ASSET:) :..~holL.i! it-~ . '. ,,. - - .- ;~ i\.)NU c.rdUl J CuRRENT LIHijILiTIES ACCOVNfS )AYAbLE ~CCR0E0 ~~_~K ~3 hD~: E~C~JH 0~~OSIT5 PAYAbLE 0t~:RRED REVENUE3 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING 3~AT~ AITri~OLDING FICA wITHHOLDING PERA wITHHOLDING VOL. DEDUCTION WITHHOLDING SEC 125 HLTH (pRE REIMS SEC 125 DEP CARE REIMB TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY FUND bALANCE NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD TOTAL FUND EQuITY TOTAL LIABILITiES/FUND EQUITY PAI~E 1,202,837.10 100.00 31,DOO.00 35,590.00 22,b78.86 84,094.41 10,403.15 2,830.26 92,969.51 1 ) ~,:2! .503,29 1 ,~~32, 503 29 Z9j!.20,b4 20,437.62 .31,250,OC) 1b3,338.30 2,162.75 2.3,39 2,113.43- 42.50 618.00 262.20 84.00 251,541. 77 1,256,859.62 25.898.10- 1,23(),961.52 1,432,503.29 CITY OF .SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND I 40 CAPITAL IMP FUND ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INYESTMENTS ACCRUE0 INTEREST RECEIVA8LE s/A REeBlE-CURRENi siA RECBlE-DELINQUENT SA RECBLE-DEFERRED TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS r[!T!4L ~:::2ETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURHENT LIAdILITIES 0€FERRE0 RtVEN0ES TOTAL CuRRENT LIABILITIES fUNU tGuIT"{ FUND 8ALi~NCE NET REvENUE/EXPENDITURES iTD TOTAL FUNQ EQuITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. 435,4/3.01 8,316.00 2,712.11 22,928.67 96,594.46 616,024.25 t16,024.2S 118,050.09 118,056.09 333,712.12; 164,255.43 497,967.So 616,024.25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY Of 3HOREWOOD 8ALANCE SHEET DAfE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND # 41 PARK CAP IMP FUND ASSETS CuRRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVA8lE TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LI4~ILljIES ~ FuND :QUITr CURRENT LIAbILITIES TOTAL CUR\CNT LIABILITIES Fi,.,;ND EQUIT"'f FUND OHLANCE N~7 R~~ENUES;EXPEN01TuRES yTD TGTAL FUND EQUITy TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE ;; 29)161.95 524.00 .~..-, . ,- ,- .-- L}IOOJ.'1J 29,685.95 0. Cii.) 11,blb.'JU 17,809.;5 29,085. ';5 29,685.95 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 8ALHNCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 i IME 03:09 Fv~D ; 42 EQuIPMENT KEPLACEMENT ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ,qS:TfS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY Cu\RENT LIABILITIES TOTAL CuRReNT LIABILITiES FUND EQUITY YEAR TO 0ATE PROFIT TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIA8ILiTIES/rUNG :QJiTr PAG E ~ 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.00 105,000.00 105,000.uO i05,000.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SHOR~~OOD 2ALANCE SHEET DATE l2/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 45 SALT/SAND SLOG-GRADING ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTric ASSETS LIA8ILITIES & FUND EQUITY CuRRt - LIA8ILITIES ACCOUNTS PAIH2LE CONTRRCTS ?~{A5LE-CURRENT TOTAL C0R;ENT LIA8ILITIES FUN[, EQulif NET Rt"1ENUE/Ei.PENuITuK,ES 'r IU TOTAL FuND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITiES/FUND EQUITY RiM 5 246,204.13 246,204.13 246}204.13 2,9.33.78 .3,2tb.1)(1 C l iUl. /0 240,002.35 240,002. ,).5 246,204.13 CITY OF 5HOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 >UND ~ 40 ~ATRFRD III/TIF OIST 1 ASSETS CuRRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEiVABLE TOTAL CU~RENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & ~UND EQUITY CuRPE~T LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CONTRACTS PAYABLE-CURRENT TDTAL. CURRENT LIASIL.L I'IES tUND :QUI:'f NET ~EVENUE/EXPEN0IT0RE Y10 TOTAL FUND EQUIT~ TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE b 64,012.98 S1650.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 72,722.92 72,722.98 5,291.16 36,071.99 41,96U5 .30,759. ;3~~ ~OI7S'~,:i3 72,722.98 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND . 41 SE WATER TRMT PLANT ASStTS CURRENT ASSETS CASH AND INVESTMENTS TOTAL C0RRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CuRRENT LIASI ITI:S ACCOUNTS PAYA8L: CONTRACTS PAYABLe "JTAL CURRENT LIA8ILITIES f0Nu EQUITY NET REVcNUEiEXPtNOITURES yTD TOTAL rUND E~ul fOTAL LIA8ILITES/FUND EQUITY PA~t i7 ,496 . 06 77j496.06 77 ,496.06 i~. . '-;', '--.( ..:. "-' . ..:.. ..... '.~ . -' ibJ~;l)b. Y:1 OljlJ I ,~i 611167. ,j 71 ,496.06 CITY OF SHORE~OOD 5ALANCE SHEET DATE 12i31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 48 PINE 8END wATERMAIN ASSETS CURR.EMT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILiliES ACCD0NT5 PAYA5LE CONTRACTS PAYABLE-CURRENT TQiML CvRRENT LIABILITIES FuND [QUlli NET REVENUE/EXPENDITuRES YTD TOTHL FUND ~QuI~i TOTAL LIABILITIES/FuND EQUITY :JAGE ~. 50,931.90 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50,931.90 50,931. 90 :;, ,~,;. i-I;:, ,-",-,,'01'-' .,)j';tL4.'11 4,322.90 46,605.94 4b , 6C): . 94 50,931. 90 CITY uF SHOREWOOD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8ALANCE SHEtT DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND 4 49 CHURCH ROAD IMPS CURRErfi ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOT AL ASSETS LIAbiLITIES & FuND EQUITY C0RR~Nj LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TOTAL CUhRENT L1HBILITIES FUi~O t~UITY NET REVENUE!EXPENDi1URES rID TO~~L FU;~D EQuITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE '! 166,599.82 573.~'O 167,177.82 167,177.32 762.08 iOi:. \,)0 166,415.74 166,415.74 167,177.82 GITI OF ShORE~OOD 8ALANCE ShEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND; SO SHADY HILLS STORM S~R ASSETS LuRRE;~T ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE TOTAL CuRRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUN0 EQUITY CURRfNT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CONTRACTS PAYABLE-CURRENT jOrAL CURRtNT LIAoILITltS FUND EQUITY -- ~-, ~"'._- ,_..~-- .--,,-.-- -. Ntl H.t'it;"~Ut:)t.~~t:'Ul!UKt) r!L~ TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIA8ILITIES!FUNO EQJITY PAGE 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1,850.14 53.00 9,903.14 9,'303.14 174,28 421.00 5'15.20 ~,307,8b 'J,jUj:bb 9,903.14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SHOREwOOu 8AL.4riCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 60 WATER UTILITY ASSETS CuR,RENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENiS AC~R.UED INTEREST RECEIVABLE TAXES REeBlE-CURRENT TAxES PECBLE-DElINQUENT AIR wATt?, SjA REeBLE DElINQ S/A REcalE DEFERRED UNAMORT. BOND DISC. PREPAID iNSURANCE - -,"-. . ,...., ,- ,- .,. " -- -. ,- -- JLJRL t.VK:..it.fi! h~':i:)~ FIXED ASSEiS MAChINE~Y & EQUIPMENT WELLS, MAINS !;, fAN~S ALLOW FOR DEPR-WATER FIXED ASSET TOTAL FIXED ASSETS jOrAL ~SSET5 LI-3IlITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYA8LE SALES TAX PAYABLE ACCRUED SALRRIES PA1HBLt TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG-TERM LIABILITIES BONDS PAYABLE TOTAL LONG-TERn LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL ~ETAINED EARNINGS NET INCO,~E YTD iOTAl FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIA8IlITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 11 34,757.24 1)S67~OO 197.02 242.30 34,557.44 489.44 ~4,744.09 91'1.00 4,615.00 142,088.Sj 23f303.00 2~268, ].38.22 4b2j496.S0 1,830,044.72 - _.- - - -- J.,'1fi~1..j,,;.LJ 0,084.27 144.52- 154.33 6,094.(.10 65,000.(,0 65,000.00 2,110,035,98 203,073.;))- 5,923.21- 1,901,039.17 lj972,133.25 CIT~ or SHOREWOOD BALM~CE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 61 SEWER UTILITY fUND ASSETS CuRRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE A/R SEWER s/A RECBLE CURRENT SjA RECBlE DELIQUENT S/A RECBlE DEFERRED PREPAID INSURANCE TOTAL CuRRENT RSSETS FIXELI ASSETS MACHINfRY & EQUIPMENT PUMPS, MAINS & LIFTS ALLOW fOR DEPR-SEwER FIXED ASSET TOTAL FIXEu ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & rUNG EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCRUED SALARIES PAYABLE CONTR~CTS PAYABLE-CURRENT TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL RETAiNED EARNINGS NET INCOME iTO TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 607,529.50 12,718.00 128,420.20 599.87 8,371.1.9 24,902.08 3,470.84 786,011. 78 36,286.00 (1);54,1.31.75 3,207,492.50 3,812,925.25 4,598,937.03 2,366.62 154.34 2,600.00 5,120.96 0.00 4,103,785.25 589,520.33 99,489.51- 4,59'),816.07 4,598,937.03 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CIT} OF SHOREwOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12j31i91 TIME 03:09 FUND 1 62 RECYCLING ASSETS CUK.RENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE AiR RECYCLE TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIxED ASSETS TOTAL FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUIT) luRRENT LIABILIJ c~ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TOTAL CURRENT LIA8ILITI~8 cONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LONG-TERM LIA8ILiTlcS rUND EQUITY NET INCOME YiD ~OTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 13 8,668.15 97.00 516.48 9,081.63 0, (1I~1 - ~~, ~ '1) Ubi :::j 4,145.00 4,145.00 0.00 4,936.63 4,936.63 9,081.03 CIT~ OF SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/~1/91 TIME 03:09 FuND; 71 LIQUOR STORE I ASSETS CuRRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS PETTY CASH NSF CHECKS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE A/R ,mc HJV /UQUOR INV/WINE INV/BEER INV/MISC PAEPAIU IMSURANC: TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXED AS:,ETS FuRNITuRE & FIXTURES ALLOW FOR DEPR-FURN & FIXTURES TOTAL FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSE:S LIH8ILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SALES TAX PAYABLE ACCRUED SALARIES PAYABLE LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LONG-iERM LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY RETAINED EARNINGS NET I NCOME no TOTAL FUND EQuITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 152,649.99 600.00 1,792.46 2,9~0.00 84.00 22,051. 00 11,154.00 12,205.00 1,810.00 1,44~.16 206,719.6 i 24,917.00 24,917.00 0.00 206,719.61 25,0~3.35 5,168.22 2,438.15 32,639.72 132,044.24 42,035.65 174,079.89 206,719.61 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CIT~ OF SHGREWOOD SALANCE SHEET 0ATE 12/31/91 rIME 03:09 FUND ~ 72 LIQuOR STORE II ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS PETTY CASH NSF CHECKS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE A/R !1ISe INV/UQuOR INV/WINE INV!8EER INV/MISC PREPAID INSURANCE TOTAL CuRREN! 45SETS FIXED ASEDS FURNITURE & F~iTu~E5 ALLOW FOR DEPR-FURN & FIXTURES fOTAL FIXED ASSeTS TOTAL HS5ETS LIABILITIES & FU\D EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNfS PAYABLE SALES TAX PAYABLE ACCRUED SALARIES PAYABLE TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES FIXED ASSETS RETAINED EARNINGS NET INCOME YTD TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABIL1TIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 15 148,428.09 600.00 555.06 2,517 .00 125.00 57,052.00 44,997.00 24,263.00 5,381.00 2,177.34 286)175.49 ~ ; -zc" '::. '-', I '~'.... -J 7,57LOO 1,164.75 =57,340.24 50,368.88 7,959.36 3,935.71 62,263.95 0.00 185,963.44 39,112.85 225,076.29 287,340.24 Clr~ OF SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 fUND; 90 1987 REFUNDING ASSETS CuRRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE siA RECBLE DEFERRED TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOT AL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CuRRENT LIA8ILITIES UtFtRRED REVENUES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY F1J:~D bALANCE NE7 R~f;:NU~!EXPEN0ITURES llU TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LI~8ILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 536,716.74 11,282.00 79,312.50 627,311.24 627 ,311.24 79,312.50 79,312.50 600,036.35 52,b37.61- 547,~98.74 627,311.24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI~Y OF SHOREWOOD 8ALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 92 SEWER IMP 71,72,728 ASS ET S CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVA8LE TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITy CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILliiES FUND EQUIT\" FUND BALANCE NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD ~GTAL F0N0 ~Q0ITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 2,552.18 75.00 2,627.18 2,627.18 0.00 4,000.00 1,372.82- 2,627.18 2)627.18 CI~Y OF SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND # 94 SEwER IMP 1974 ASSETS CURRENT ASSEiS CASH & INVESiMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE TAXES REC8LE-DELINQ S/A RECBlE CURRENT S/A RECBLE DELIQUENT S/A RECBLE DEFERRED TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQU1iY CuRRENT LIABILITIES DEFERRED REvENUES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY FUND BALANCE NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 39,463.42 1,833.00 345.80 811.74 8,002.14 43,422.54 93,878.64 93,878.64 44,634.29 44}634.29 77 ,340.68 28,596.33- 49,244.35 93,878.64 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ellY OF SHOREWOOD 8ALAriCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND # 95 1989 REFUNDING ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVA8LE S/A REe8LE CURRENT S/A REC8LE DEFERRED TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIA8ILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIA8ILITIES DEFERRED REVENUES TOTAL CuRRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY FUND 8ALANCE ~jET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIA8ILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 19 816,533.97 14,118.00 1,311.31 394,024.40 1,225,987.68 1,225,987.68 394,O;A.40 394,024.40 649,757.55 182,205. /3 831,963.28 1,225,987.68 CIT~ OF SHOREWOOD BALANCE SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 PAGE 2:) I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FUND; 96 WATRFRD III/TIF DST il ASSErs CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 0.00 TOTAL ASSETS 0.00 LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 0.00 FUND EQUITY TOTAL FUND E~uITY 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI~Y OF SHOREWOOD 8ALANCE. SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 FUND ~ 98 1986 IMPROVEMENTS ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE S/A RECBlE CURRENT SjA RECBLE DEFERRED TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES DEFERRED REVENUES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY FUND BALANCE NET REVENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUITY PAGE 21 568,3J.1.40 11,129.00 200.27 151,734.80 731,375.47 731,375.47 151,734.30 151,7~'4.80 574,602.19 5,038.48 579,640.67 731,375.47 C1 f~)' OP SHOREi'lOOD 8HLrl'~Cc SHEET DATE 12/31/91 TIME 03:09 PUND ; 99 1992 IMPS, REFUNDING ASSETS CURR.ENT ASSETS CASH & INVESTMENTS ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE SjA RECEIVABLE DEFERReu TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOT AL ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES DEFERRED REVENUES TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY NET REvENUE/EXPENDITURES YTD TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES/FUND EQUI~~ PAGE 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 301,899.86 1,113.00 482,445.5c 785,458.42 785,458.42 482,445.56 482,445.56 303,012.86 303,012.06 785,458.42 ~ ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Acting Chairman Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Andrus (late), Commissioners Lindstrom, Vogel, Christensen, Laberee, Dzurak and Wilson; Park Secretary Niccum; Council Liaison Lewis and Administrator Hurm . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vogel moved, Dzurak seconded, to approve the minutes of Tuesday, August 13, 1991, with an addition by Lindstrom clarifying his comments regarding the use of snowmobiles on the trail presented as a survey question in the water survey (top of page four). Motion carried - 4 ayes - 2 abstain REVIEW OF REFERENDUM OUESTIONNAIRE Each Commissioner reviewed the answers he received while making survey calls. The Commission was encouraged by the response. They said most people had been courteous and willing to take part in the surveys. At present there are 63 yes votes, 46 no votes, and 41 surveys left to do. . STATUS REPORT ON UPDATE OF PARK C.I.P. Administrator Hurm explained that he has been working with a card system, has met with Mark Koegler and Brad Nielsen, and will be finished with Draft I shortly. REVIEW COMMISSION GOALS Administrator Hurm reviewed the "Shorewood Park Commission Staff Support" sheet with the Commission. He explained that the Council had decided not to hire an in-house engineer at this time, therefore the items listed under "Staff Engineer" would be delegated elsewhere: . Project Manager Consulting Assistance, Public Works Director, and City Administrator . Park ClP Consulting Assistance, Planning Director, and City Administrator .. ~ SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 - Page two . Cost Est/Budgets City Administrator and Consulting Assistance . Design Project Consulting Assistance Hurm said it is very important to identify the project manager. Hurm also reviewed the "1992 Park Commission Goals" - Draft I. The Commission changed "Reduce consultant fees" to "continue to reduce and monitor consultant fees" and they changed "Improve the quality of Commission imput in the development of the operating budget" to "continue to improve the quality..............". Hurm said the Commission now has a lot of good information to work with. Planner Nielsen .will be attending the meeting of March 10 to . help with the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Hurm asked the Commission if they did want to do the referendum, when did they want to do it? 6 months? 12 months? He. said we need to start working on it. commission comments: Christensen - hold the referendum in the spring, possibly April. Laberee - the idea has to be sold to the people and this takes time. Wilson - in the past some some wanted to go ahead. but the survey helped. failure. people were concerned about the economy, The "Town Meetings" created some doubt Doesn't want to go ahead if doomed to . Dzurak - Spring of 1993, spend a year on an education campaign. Lindstrom - agreed with Dzurak. He said when the survey results are in, and the school referendum is over, we will have a better idea. He thought Spring was better. Vogel - Fall. Dzurak said he would work with Hurm on the set-up and presentation. Hurm mentioned next January or February. Laberee said he is starting to change his mind. If the results of the survey are positive, he will get right out there and promote. Liaison Lewis said if the Commission came before the council asking to have the referendum in April, he would vote against it. There is a lot of work to do and the Commission needs to have a business ~ y SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 - Page three plan in place. They have to sell the Council and the Community. Vogel asked what happens while waiting for the referendum, does anything get done or does everything just sit and wait? Hurm said that's why Plan C has to be accomplished, and compared with Plan B, so they City can see what can be done. . Christensen mentioned that the Commission had set 4 priorities, the first two had been accomplished, but the relocation of Cathcart field and the trail system from Silverwood Park to Highway 7 have not yet been accomplished. He also asked about cutting the rest of the Freeman Park Trail. Lindstrom questioned how to accomplish getting field #3, Tonka Men's Club Little League Field, finished. He also mentioned the Snyder's concern about the Eureka Road entrance to Freeman Park, would it be possible to relocate the entrance to the north and put in some plantings? And blacktop part way into the park? Lewis mentioned the City in-house engineer, saying that the Councilmembers did not agree on the issue. They weren't sure if there would be enough projects in the future to warrant an in-house engineer. He said they may revise their decision. They are going to monitor expenses for a year or so. Lewis also mentioned that when he was campaigning for office, he discovered that many people had an interest in trails. Lindstrom mentioned the pie graph that had appeared in one of the newsletters. He thought that it would be a good idea to do a similar one showing what percentage of property taxes go toward parks. . Hurm said it appeared that the major goals for 1992 are the referedum preparation and development of Plan C. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Park Planninq Presentation bv Mark Koeqler of Hoisinqton GroUD, Inc. Koegler thanked the Commission. He said he would not go into a lot of detail regarding his experience because the Commission is already familiar with it. He said he joined Hoisington Group Inc. , a planning and landscape architectural firm, in November of 1991. He left Van Doren Hazard stalling to pursue different career goals. He will be working with Fred Hoisington, a man with 26 years of experience in planning, including park projects; and Diane Klausner, a registered landscape architect. Some of their experience has been doing work for the City of Minnetonka, a nature study an athletic needs study. .. " SHOREWOOD PARR COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 - Page four Also a large nature preserve for H. B. Fuller Company. They haveexperience in grading and irrigation, as well as ball fields. Koegler said he would be the project manager on all planning, design, specifications and on-site. He feels that Shorewood has future challenges to face. He said he is qualified, has a good rapport with the Commission, and a good working knowledge of Shorewood's parks and people. Koegler said HGI is not an engineering firm. They would subcontract with Van Doren Hazard stallings do their engineering work, the rates would be comparable. . He referred to his credentials, referendum experience, accountability, and getting projects done. Hurm asked Koegler if he would remain the main contact with Shorewood? Koegler said he would be the main person, the relationship would not change. He would be responsible as project manager. Laberee asked Koegler if he engineering firm if necessary. not pose a problem. could work wi th another Koegler said that would Soccer Tournament - Julv 24 & 25 Christensen moved, Vogel seconded, to support the request of the Minnetonka Youth Soccer Association to hold a . tournament July 24 and 25, 1992, that they be allowed to place a canopy on the grass with Public Works Director Zdrazil's approval and use a propane grill, ass~ming all insurance information and a signed contract have been presented to the city of Shorewood. It was decided that this is an Administrative decision, that it is up to staff to make decisions on garbage removal, satellites, policing after the tournament, deposit requirement, user fees, and basing approval on this year's conduct. striDinq of Cathcart Hockev Rink and Boards Information item...Public Works Director Zdrazil approved above, and it has been done. ~ , SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 - Page five REPORTS Snow Patrol - Letter of Understandinq Administrator Hurm reported on the "Letter of Understanding" regarding the Snow Patrol. He said they have met with the Police Department for training. They now have 10 members. Park Planner Discussion . wilson said if its a workable situation, continue using both Van Doren Hazard Stallings and Hoisington Group, Inc. Hurm said the City would not want two agreements, they would want one subcontracted to the other. wilson said in that case, he would like to see Hoisington Group have the main contract. Lindstrom said the referendum is probably the most important thing the Commission will ever do, Koegler has done an excellent job, and he feels he is a critical key. Andrus said the contract is already with Van Doren Hazard Stallings, and he feels it should be left there. He thinks someone with more experience than either firm should be used for the referendum. . Vogel and Laberee said they know Koegler and have confidence in him. Dzurak suggested maintaining VHS but using Koegler as Park Planner. III!Em;~:~:~:19YII:t::~~~:~:~I.;~:~:~:::~mBggnl!l:t::~I:~;g:i~: :1:~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::~I!EI:~.~:j::~:::&g~:::I~Egle:mn!~:~:j::B!:~:~:~:lffi.~:~:~:~in~~~:::DEII;ml~I:~:~E9i!Eig! !:~:t:::~::~:~:~:~::::~ml~:~II!,:~g~$:mE:::::::i:9E~::Ii::~:::~:geBEElsII~:~EE9gRm:i~M~:~:~:~ffiBgWIII@~ Christensen said he abstained because he was impressed with VHS's presentation, Koegler has the referendum experience, and he hasn't made a decision yet. The Commission asked Hurm if he had a preference, he said he could work with either. SHOREWOOD PARK COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992 - Page six ADJOURNMENT Dzurak moved, Lindstrom seconded, to adjourn the meeting of Tuesday, January 28, 1992. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Susan A. Niccum Park Secretary ~ . . .