Loading...
112591 CC Reg AgPCITY OF SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1991 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. 6:45 P.M. - EXECUTIVE SESSION - DISCUSSION WITH CITY ATTORNEY ON PENDING LITIGATION AGENDA 1. 7:00 P.M. - CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Mayor Brancel Gagne Stover Daugherty Lewis C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Meeting - October 28, 1991 (Att.No.2B- Minutes) B. 6:30 pm - Special City Council Meeting - November 4, 1991 (Att.No.2B- Minutes) C. Special City Council Information Meeting - November 4, 1991 (Att.No.2C- Minutes) D. Special City Council Meeting - November 12, 1991 (Att.No.2D- Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Consent Agenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein A. Motion to Approve Payment Request A &K Construction - Water Treatment Plant for S.E. Area (Att.No.3A- Payment Voucher) B. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat - Shorewood Suburban Estates Applicant: North Suburban Development Co -Jack Menkveld Location: West of Strawberry Lane, 420 ft. so. of Smithtown Road (Att.No.3B- Planner's Memo, Resolution Approving Prelim Plat) COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 25, 1991 - PAGE TWO 3. CONSENT AGENDA Motion to Approve Consent Agenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein - Continued C. Motion to Approve Conditional Use Permit - Temporary Park Shelter Building Applicant: Shorewood Park Commission Location: Manor Park (Att.No.3C- Planner's Memo) D. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Naming an Appointee to the Planning Commission Vacancy - Jack Hansen (Att.No.3D- Resolution) E. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Naming an Appointee to the Planning Commission Vacancy - Douglas Malam (Att.No.3E- Resolution) F. Motion to Adopt the Position Description for a Joint Prosecuting Attorney (Att.No.3F- Position Description) G. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Appointing Kenneth N. Potts as the Joint Prosecuting Attorney (Att.No.3G- Resolution) H. Motion to Accept the Letter of Agreement for a Joint Prosecting Attorney (Att.No.3H- Letter of Agreement) I. Motion to Approve a,Resolution Requesting Variance from State Aid Operations Rule, Chapter 8820.2800 (Att.No.3I- Resolution, Engineer's Memo) J. Motion to Approve Payment Voucher No.2- City Project No-91 - Old Market Road (Att.No.3J- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) K. Motion to Aprove Payment Voucher No.1- City Project No-91-11 - Pine Bend Watermain (Att.No.3K- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) L. Motion to Approve Payment Voucher No.1- City Project No-91 - Lift Station Repair (Att.No.3L- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) M. Motion to Approve Payment Voucher No.1 - City Project No-91 - Shady Hills Storm Sewer Repair (Att.No.3M- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 25, 1991 - PAGE THREE 3. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to Approve Consent Agenda and Adopt Resolutions Therein - Continued N. . Motion to Approve Payment Voucher No.1 - City Project No. 91 -61 - Public Works Site Grading (Att.No.3N- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) O. Motion to Approve Payment Voucher No. 1 - City Project No. 91 - Salt /Sand Storage Building (Att.No.30- Engineer's Memo, Pay Voucher) 4. COMMISSION REPORT A. Planning Commission 1. Input on Old Market Road intersection from Highway 7 from Radisson Road residents 2. Report on Capital Improvement Program - ,Public Hearing B. Park Commission 5. 7:15 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADOPTING A 1992 GENERAL WATER SEWER AND RECYCLING BUDGETS AND SETTING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR 1991 COLLECTIBLE IN 1992 (Att.No.5- Resolution) 6. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL PREMISES (Att.No.6- Resolution) 7. APPEAL TO ZONING VIOLATION Appellant: Boyd Wittman Location: 5540 Teal Circle (Att.No.7- Zoning Violation Letter, Appeal Letter) 8. APPEAL NOTICE TO REMOVE Appellant: John Chambers Location: 24560 Smithtown Road (Att.No.8- Notice, Appeal Letter) 9. ACTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE FOR STUDYING TRAFFIC CONTROL ON OLD MARKET ROAD (Att.No.9- Administrator's Memo) COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 25, 1991 - PAGE FOUR 10. MOTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH MUNITECH FOR SEWER /WATER MAINTENANCE (Att. No. 10 -Contract, Finance Director's Memo) 11. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 12. STAFF REPORTS A. City Attorney 1. Report on Combination Beer /Wine License - Proposed Ordinance (Country Kitchen) (Att.No.12A- Ordinance) B. City Engineer C. Planning Director D. City Administrator 1. City Policy (Att.No.12D -1- Policy) 2. December City Newsletter 3. Update on Glen Road Drainage Project 13. COUNCIL REPOR A. Mayor Brancel 1. Discussion on Joint Powers Agreement for Police Services (Att.No.13A -1- Agreement) 2. Establish a Procedure for Selecting the Senior Housing Task Force (Att.No.13A -2- Letters) B. Councilmember 14. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Attachment Claims List) JCH.al 11/21/91 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1991 EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:45 P.M. - DISCUSSION WITH CITY ATTORNEY ON PENDING LITIGATION. PLEASE COME TO THE CONFERENCE ROOM BEFORE 6:45 AGENDA ITEM 3A - The amount of this pay request from A &K Construction for the Iron Removal Plant is $175,182.75. AGENDA ITEM 3B - This resolution approves the preliminary plat for the Shorewood Suburban Estates Subdivision. The approval of the preliminary plat by the Council is tentative only. The developer must come back within six months with a final plat. The enclosed Planner's memorandum recommendations become part of this approval. Water would be supplied by individual wells. AGENDA ITEM 3C - This motion approves a CUP for temporary Manor Park Shelter building. The motion gives approval for one year. AGENDA ITEM 3D and 3E - These resolutions officially make the appointment of Jack Hansen and Douglas Malam to the Planning Commission. They are filling terms. which are both due to expire December 31, 1992. AGENDA ITEM 3F 3G and 3H - Thrpe motions are required. The first is to accept the position description for Joint Prosecuting Attorney, the next adopts a resolution appointing Kenneth Potts as Joint Prosecuting Attorney, and the final motion accepts the Letter of Agreement to be signed by Kenneth Potts. It should be noted that the cities of Tonka Bay and Excelsior already have taken similar actions. AGENDA ITEM 3I - This is a housekeeping resolution which is required by MnDOT to be. able to accept the financing of approximately $150,000 for the Old Market Road intersection project. A full explanation is given in the attached letter from Joel Dresel dated November'21. AGENDA ITEM 3J - This motion approves Pay Voucher # 2 to Hardrives, Inc. in the amount of $404,574.34. This is for the Old Market Road intersection project. AGENDA ITEM 3K - This motion approves Payment Voucher # 1 to Widmer Inc., in the amount of $74,573.31 for the Pine Bend Watermain project. AGENDA ITEM 3L -This motion approves Payment Voucher # 1 to New Mech Companies, Inc for $49,400 for rehabilitation of lift stations # 5 & 6. AGENDA ITEM 3M -This motion approves Payment Voucher # 1 to Widmer Inc. for $7,999 for the Shady Hills Storm Sewer improvement. AGENDA ITEM 3N - Is Payment Voucher #1 to NW Asphalt Inc for $30,694.50 for the Sand /Salt facility site grading project. AGENDA ITEM 30 - Is a motion to approve Payment Voucher # 1 to Ebert Construction in the amount of $32,212.50 for materials and labor purchased for the sand /salt storage building, which will be completed in the spring of 1992. AGENDA 4A -1 - Residents from the Radisson Road area came to the November 5th Planning Commission meeting asking that they be given an opportunity for input into decisions regarding the Old Market Road intersection and its opening. They were told at the meeting the City Council would be happy to hear their concerns and therefore it is specifically listed on this agenda. 4A -2- - The Planning Commission will place on its agenda for their December 3, 1991 meeting, discussion on the Capital Improvement Program. Their official recommendation should be available for the City Council meeting scheduled for December 9th. AGENDA ITEM 5 - 7:15 P.M. Public hearing on the proposed budget for the year 1992. A presentation of up to one -half hour in length will be made by the Finance Director. Following the presentation the general public would be given an opportunity for input. The City Council action then would be to adopt the budget resolution which is enclosed. AGENDA ITEM 6 - This resolution establishes sewer service rates for residential and nonresidential premises. This is as had been discussed in the operating budget work session. It will be explained again at the operating budget presentation. AGENDA ITEM 7 - Boyd Wittman, 5540 Teal Circle, is requesting an extension of time to December 15, 1991 to properly store a boat on his property. AGENDA ITEM 8 - This is an appeal to remove a pickup topper from 24560 Smithtown Road. The request is for an extension of several months. AGENDA ITEM 9 - I have prepared a memorandum for the City Council listing each of the Old Market Road Transportation Task Force recommendations and summarizing the responses and comments received on each of the recommendations. I suggest that the Council review each recommendation and decide on each separately on its merits. Further it should be noted that since this memorandum was prepared the Planning Commission minutes on November 5th have become available. On page 6 of those minutes a motion was passed to recommend that the City Council proceed with the opening of Old Market Road intersection as quickly as possible, based on the public hearing of five years ago and the studies and research done for the project. The motion carried 4/0. This matter was raised as a result of the discussion by Paul Aubrecht of Radisson Road. That discussion begins on page 5, of the Planning Commission mirrutes . AGENDA ITEM 10 - The City received only one proposal for maintenance of our. sewer and water systems which came from Munitech. The proposed contract is enclosed. It is an increase of $400 per month over the 1991 rates, but it should be noted that it includes maintenance of the iron removal facility. It should be noted that this proposal does not include physically comparing the inside and outside readings for each property. Munitech has found it very difficult to do this and would charge an additional $9,600 in 1992 if the Council wishes this to be done. Please refer to the November 20 memorandum from Finance Director Al Rolek, which suggests that it would be more efficient for the City to send out self reading cards to the residents once per year. Please read his memorandum for more details. AGENDA ITEM 12 - STAFF REPORTS 12A -1 - The City Attorney has drafted a proposed ordinance which incorporates an on -sale intoxicating malt liquor /wine license into our code. He will explain at the meeting. 12D -1 - There are a number of private roads in the City of Shorewood. The enclosed policy would establish a charge for the City Department of Public Works to supply a barrel with sand and salt for private use on such roads. We feel this is good public safety policy and should be adopted by a motion of the City Council. 12D -2 - Suggestions for the final 1992 City Newsletter should be made to myself by December 3rd. 12D -3 - Brad Nielsen has talked with.a resident of the Glen Road area who hopes to have an update by the time of the meeting. 13A -1 - The Police Department Joint Powers Agreement is enclosed. It is the same agreement as the current document that runs out at the end of 1992 but includes a 20 year extension. The Council has discussed a 10 year extension and might like to suggest that to the coordinating committee. If there are any further suggestions or changes to the contract please give them to the Mayor at the meeting. 13A -2- Three letters of interest to date on serving on the Senior Housing Task Force are enclosed in the packet. The Council needs to determine how they will make final appointments to that task force which should be operable January 1, 1992. JCH.al 11/21/91 CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1991 M I N U T E S • 1. CALL TO ORDER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 1 Mayor Brancel called the meeting to order at 7:00 P. M. A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel, Councilmembers Gagne, Stover, Daugherty and Lewis, City Administrator Hurm, City Attorney Sellergren, City Engineer Dresel and City Planner Nielsen. C. REVIEW AGENDA Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the agenda as written. Motion carried - 5/0 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council Meeting - October 14, 1991 Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the City Council minutes of October 14, 1991 with the following correction: 1. Pg. 3 Last line - Each unit will be assessed $1012.76 per year for 10 years. It should say the assessment is $1012.76 per unit distributed over a ten year period. 0 3. Motion carried -,3/2 (abstain - Lewis, Stover) B. Special City Council Meeting - October 15 1991 Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the Special City Council Minutes of October 15, 1991. Motion carried - 4/1 abstain (Stover) CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION NO. 109 -91 RESOLUTION NO. 110 -91 RESOLUTION NO. 111 -91 RESOLUTION NO. 112 -91 Mayor Brancel read the following Consent Agenda: 1 RESOLUTION N O. 108 -91 AA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 —PAGE 2 A. Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 108 -91 Granting C.U.P. for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet to Paul Sardine." Applicant: Paul Bardine Location: 6085 Riviera Lane B. Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 109 -91 "A Resolution Granting C.U.P. for Accessory Space in Excess of 1200 Square Feet to Richard Baker." Applicant: Richard Baker Location: 5235 Howards Point Road C. Motion to Approve Progress Payment Request - A & K Construction for Southeast Area Water Treatment Plant D. Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 110 -91 "A Resolution Amending • Resolution No. 105 -91, Approving Special Assessments for Southeast Area Water Treatment Facility." E. Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 111 -91 "A Resolution Approving a Letter of Agreement for Engineering on the Public Works Facility." F. Motion to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 112 -91 "A Resolution Accepting Improvements and Releasing Security - Galpin Lake Woods Applicant: Jeff Schoenwetter Location: Bracketts Road Stover moved, Gagne seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and Adopt the Resolutions Therein. Motion carried - 5/0 4• PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO DICK SPELLMAN Mayor Brancel presented a plaque to Dick Spellman for his 10 years of dedicated service on the Shorewood Planning Commission. Spellman thanked Brancel and said it has been a great learning experience to be part of the Planning Commission. 5. RECEIPT OF RESTRICTIONS ON GIDEON'S COVE DOCK RIGHTS AND USE WITH PENINSULA The Staff indicated to the Council that a 4/5 vote is necessary to approve the dock rights and peninsula use in the Gideon's Cove P.U.D. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 3 Councilmember Stover asked if anything else had changed. She said, if the P.U.D. is approved, the docks are not grandfathered. Councilmember Lewis said the approval of the dock rights and Peninsula use would set a precedent for non - conforming use. BOB BOYER - BOYER BUILDING stated he would like to have the issue decided at this meeting. He said the option of leaving the peninsula as is is not possible. He asked for the Council's input. Boyer felt there will be more control of the peninsula and docks if an association controlled the access. He said the proposed use of the peninsula will be an improvement over what is currently in place. Lewis said Boyer is assuming that two owners of the docks will have three boats each. Stover asked Bob Rascop - LMCD Rep. if there will be a charge for a third boat at a dock. • Rascop said a resident must prove ownership of all three boats at his dock. He said the LMCD is considering banning new homeowners associations. Boyer said the peninsula is legally tied to the Gideon's Cove land. He said their request for six boat slips is reasonable. Stover reiterated her position that the peninsula is non- contiguous property. Councilmember Gagne said the land is put to better use by a group than by one individual. Stover said the same type of issue was previously brought before the Council and was denied. The issue was then resolved in court. She said these same residents could reapply, if the Council approves the proposed dock rights. Gagne said this is not the same situation and the Council has better control. Councilmember Daugherty asked if there will be any other public • impact. Rascop stated that when the density on Lake Minnetonka reaches 1 boat per 5 acres, the grandfathered dock rights will be revoked. Daugherty said he has had many calls from residents regarding this P.U.D. and asked City Attorney Sellergren for a clarification of "grandfathered ". Sellergren said if the Boyers continue with the current approved Plat, the docks are grandfathered. If the Council approves a P.U.D., then the Council can decided how the docks are to be distributed. Lewis said the Planning Commission did not approve of the expansion of the dock rights and the LMCD may not grant a license. He said he does not want to reject their findings. Gagne moved, Brancel seconded to approve the dock rights expanded to six of the units and subject to the Planner's recommendations #3 in his memo of October 23, 1991. Motion failed - 3/2 (Lewis, Stover) (4/5 vote is required) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 4 Boyer asked the Council where this leaves them. Nielsen said the Boyers can return with a development stage plan that includes the docks deeded to the first two units of the development. He said the peninsula can be part of an association. Gordie Lindstrom, Park Commissioner presented the proposed Snowmobile Ordinance. He said the Ordinance is based on the Brooklyn Park Snowmobile Ordinance and will be under the direction of the Police Department. The Ordinance establishes a Snow Patrol. Lt. John Hodgdon, South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety explained that the Snow Patrol will assist the Police Dept. He said the Patrol can handle citizen complaints and refer possible citations to the Police. He said the establishment of the Patrol will not . solve all the problems but will allow snowmobiling to continue in Shorewood. Stover questioned Subdv.. 10 of the Ordinance which details the hours of operation except for transportation to the residence of the operator. She said this section offers a loophole to snow - mobilers who will operate the machines all night. Hodgdon said this section gives an avenue to the snowmobilers to go home. He said snowmobiling is allowed on Lake Minnetonka by other cities until 2:00 A.M. and without this subdivision the Ordinance will be difficult to enforce. Councilmember Gagne said he supports this Ordinance. He said the only other alternative is to abolish snowmobiling within the City. Councilmember Daugherty asked Hodgdon is the Ordinance authorizes the Police more right to cite snowmobilers. Hodgdon said the Ordinance allows the Police to enter Park property to issue citations. Daugherty said he would like to establish a time period to see how the Ordinance works. Stover added the Police Department should compile a report. She reiterated her position that motorized vehicles are not allowed on the Hiking & Biking Trail in the summer, therefore, snowmobiles should not be allowed in the winter. Stover read a list of the changes she would like to see in the Ordinance. Daugherty asked the snowmobile club how many volunteers they have for the Snow Patrol. Mike Ellis - Southwest Trail Association said they have 15 individuals from their club. They expect to patrol 8 hours per week. He said the Patrol will follow up on complaints and issue a written report. Steve Dzurak, Park Commissioner said there are two Ordinances and a motion to establish a Snow Patrol. -- 4 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 5 City Administrator Hurm said the Snow Patrol will be established with the passage of the two Ordinances. Lewis moved, Gagne seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 245 "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 802 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to Snowmobiles including the change of snowmobile definition to coincide with the State and to review the Ordinance in January. Motion carried - 4/1 (Stover) 7. PROP Gagne moved, Lewis seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 246 "An Ordinance Amending Chapters 801 and 902 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to the Use of Police Vehicles." • Motion carried - 5/0 0 Lindstrom explained the proposed Park Reservation /User Fees. Upon approval, fees will be included in a later Resolution incorporating all fees. Gagne moved, Lewis seconded to approve the Park Reservation /User Fee Schedule. Motion carried - 5/0 . 9. Gagne said the City has had no statute to cover underage use of alcohol. Litsey said this Ordinance will clarify the State Law and give the Police Department better ability to enforce the Law. Hodgdon said the Ordinance was reviewed by the Hennepin County Bench. Stover moved, Gagne seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 247 "An Ordinance Amending Title 400 of the Shorewood City Code, Adding Chapter 404 Regarding Consumption, Purchase and Possession of Alcohol by Persons Under the Age of 21 Years." 5 Brian Litsey, South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety explained that the proposed Ordinance has had many modifications to avoid duplication of State Law. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 — PAGE 6 Motion carried — 5/0 10. REPORT AND CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE ON OLD MARKET ROAD Jim Berdahl — Chairman, Transportation Task Force presented the recommendations of the Task Force. He thanked Dresel, Nielsen and Hurm for their help during the past few months. Berdahl said their first meeting was held on Oct. 28, 1991, Dresel reviewed the construction status of Old Market - Road and informed the Task Force that construction on the Vine Hill intersection will be postponed until 1994. Berdahl reminded the Council that the Christmas Lake Road intersection is postponed indefinitely because of objections by Greenwood. The Task Force had lengthy discussions regarding school children and the bus routes on Old Market Road. Berdahl said the second meeting was held Oct. 17, 1991. Dresel, again, review the construction project and said the paving should be completed this week. Berdahl asked if the intersection will be completed before spring. Dresel said it will not. Berdahl said the reason for the Old Market Road intersection was to access the proposed Waterford III commercial development. Gagne and Stover disagreed. They said the intersection is being constructed to handle the traffic from the Southeast area development. Lewis said the Task Force has a different perception of the reason for the intersection. The Task Force phase one recommendations are: 1. Open intersection to frontage road only. Do not open Old Market Road south of frontage. 2. Continue monitoring traffic at key locations. 3. Continue working with Minnetonka regarding completion of Townline and resulting traffic it will create on Vine Hill /Covington /Old Market Road. 4. Leave Covington Rd. as a "T" into Vine Hill and amend Comp Plan to conform with this recommendation. Phase Two recommendations would occur when Old Market Road opens south of the frontage road and include: 1. Install stop signs on Old Market Rd. at Waterford Place. 2. Install "Children Crossing" signs on Old Market Rd. at Muirfield N. & S., Waterford Place, Chartwell Hill and Covington. 3. Reduce speed along Old Market Road /Covington M Rd. to 25 MPH. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 — PAGE 7 4. Encourage police to ticket violators of 5. Install sidewalks along Old Market Road. 6. Consider AM /PM traffic reversal. 7 — 9 A.M.: Northbound traffic only 4 — 6 P.M.: Southbound traffic only 0 speed or stop signs. Lewis asked Dresel if a speed study must be done to lower limit to 25 MPH. He saw many 25 MPH signs in Minnetonka. said the signs may have been installed prior to the speed requirement. Gagne said he is totally against closing Old Market Road. he has told Radisson Road residents that this intersection drain traffic from their neighborhood. Brancel said the recommendations should be sent to staff. Lewis said the staff has been involved in the preparation recommendations. He said the real questions is the safety integrity of the neighborhood. the speed Dresel study He said will of these and Lewis asked the Council to adopt the Phase One recommendations so that Old Market Road does not become a collector street instead of Vine Hill Road. BREAK — 9:00 — 9:05 Berdahl stated that the opening of Old Market Road before the completion of Vine Hill will change residents driving habits. Stover asked Dresel if Covington Road is a T intersection with Vine Hill Road. Dresel said the original plan was to have a slip intersection. The Task Force recommendation will formalize what is already in place. Daugherty moved, Lewis seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 114 "A Resolution Requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation to • Expeditiously Complete the Vine Hill Road Intersection Project at State Trunk Highway 7. Motion carried — 3/2 (Stover, Gagne) Stover asked Dresel what affect this resolution will have on State funding. Dresel said there would be no affect. The resolution requests the State to- expedite the Vine Hill project. Stover thought the last "whereas" in the resolution gave approval to the recommendations of the Task Force. Hurm and Sellergren said the statement is factual and legally does not incorporate all the Task Force recommendations. Brancel said the planning for Old Market Road was predicated on Vine Hill being done first. Lewis said some of the Phase I recommendations are simple and some may need further discussion but he asked the Council to pass the Phase I recommendations to the staff to deal with. Rascop Council suggested the Council send the recommendations to the Met for review of the Comprehensive Plan. 7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 8 Dresel said a traffic count was done. Gagne said a traffic study cannot be done without opening Old Market Road and it is a collector street. Lewis said Gagne's remark was callous given the amount of children in the neighborhood. Stover suggested the school district be contacted about rerouting buses from Old Market Road. Stover moved, Gagne seconded to recommend the Council refer the Transportation Task Force recommendations to the staff, MnDot, Police Department for their recommendations. Motion carried - 5/0 Stover again reiterated that the State funding could be in jeopardy by not opening Old Market Road. She said MnDOT will not build an entrance to Old Market Road. Lewis said the project was initiated by Shorewood. He said without . the commercial development their would be no need for the intersection. Dresel said he has inquired informally at MnDOT and they will not alter their plans unless a formal request is made by Shorewood. Lewis said a tie -in with the opening of the Vine Hill Road intersection should make sense to MnDOT. Randy Travalia - Trivesco said the Task Force was set up without Trivesco's input and they own the land. He said the Council should not pass on the recommendations of the Task Force. Stover said she does not want to make recommendations to the State unless the ramifications are known, she does not want to imperil the City. Daugherty said something should be done before there is a safety problem. Gagne said no one from Radisson Road was on the Task Force to Present their viewpoints. Berdahl said the Council should consider these recommendations, a lot of time and effort went into the preparation. He said the Council has already decided how they will act on this issue. Travalia asked the Council what has changed since 1985 and the approval of the plan. He is one of the land owners and was never asked his opinion. He said this can become a significant legal issue. Dresel asked the Council if he should consider gathering data for the presentation to Mn /DOT. The Council said no. They decided to discuss the issue on Nov. 12. 11. 1992 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT - CITY OF CHANHASSEN Brancel said there are now more staff on the Animal Patrol. 8 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 — PAGE 9 Lewis asked the amount budgeted for Animal Patrol. Hurm said it is $15,000 for 1992 and Brancel said the budget was $12,000 for 1991. Daugherty asked if wild animals are impounded. Hodgdon said the Police Dept. has change their procedure regarding wild animal complaints. He said previously the Police did not respond or call the Animal Patrol unless the animal was a threat. He said they will now notify the Animal Patrol when a complaint is received. • Stover moved, Daugherty seconded to approve the 1992 Animal Control Contract with the following amendment: "Chanhassen shall bill the owner of the deceased animal for disposal when the party is known, or the city from which the animal originated if the owner is not know." Motion carried — 5/0 12. Hurm said the proposed Resolution was drawn up using HUD guidelines to establish a one time deferment of a special assessment. He said this is not an indefinite deferment; there will be a review by the Council. Daugherty asked who verifies the eligibility. Hurm said the Staff will verify the applications. Stover asked if this information will be private. Hurm explained the applications will be public information. Sellergren concurred. • Daugherty moved, Stover seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 113 "A Resolution Approving and Adopting a Policy Regarding Deferment of Special Assessments for Senior Citizens or Retired and Disabled Persons." Motion carried — 5/0 13. COMMISSION REPORTS: A. Planning Commission 1. Review Applications for Planning Commission Vacancies and Schedule Interviews. Hurm reported for Planner Nielsen. He said the City - has received six applications for the Planning Commission vacancies. He suggested the Council have a special meeting to interview the applicants and at the same time discuss the Johnson lawsuit. The Council decided to meet at 6:45 P.M. on Nov. 25 to discuss the Johnson lawsuit and at 7:00 P.M. on Nov. 12 to interview the Planning Commission applicants. 9 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 — PAGE 10 2. Consider a Process for Appointing Members of the Senior Housing and Services Task Force. Hurm said they have had one applicant for the Task Force. B. Park Commission The Park Commissioners presented the Snowmobile Ordinance and _Park User Fees. 14. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR There were no matters from the floor. 15. STAFF REPORTS: • A. ATTORNEY'S REPORT 1. Status Johnson vs City of Shorewood Sellergren said he has answered the Johnson lawsuit. The City's insurance company has denied coverage of the lawsuit, as was expected. 2. Discussion of an Amendment to the Penalty Section of the Zoning Code (Consider Setting a Date for a Public Hearing) Sellergren said the penalty section should include imprisonment as a penalty for misdemeanors. It helps to enforce the law. An ordinance will be prepared with several technical changes for public hearing before the Planning Commission. 3. Consideration of liquor Ordinance to allow wine and beer. Sellergren said there has been some inquiry into reopening a restaurant in Shorewood and they would like to serve wine and beer. At the present time, there is no provision for this in the Shorewood Code. Sellergren asked the Council if they wanted Staff to draft an Ordinance. The Council authorized the Staff to draft an Ordinance to allow wine and beer to be served in Shorewood restaurants. B. ENGINEER'S REPORT There was no report. 10 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 11 Gagne asked Engineer Dresel if the Pine Bend project is completed. Dresel said they are ready to connect the system and a letter will be sent to residents regarding connection. C. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT There was no Planner's report. D. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 1. AMM 1992 Legislative Policy Hurm said the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities will hold it's legislative policy meeting on Nov. 7th. If any Councilmember is interested in attending, they can contact him for details. • 2. City Policies Hurm said the Staff drew up a Statement of Purpose for Shorewood City Officials and Employees. Our Purpose: to provide a value in municipal services to assure compliance with community laws and standards, and to keep citizens informed of those services, laws and standards. Our Goal: to serve our purpose in such an efficient, friendly manner that residents feel good about being citizens of the Shorewood community. Our Expectations: to accomplish our goal we must serve in an impartial fashion; be open, accurate, patient and courteous; and take pride in the job we do. Let us know when we don't meet our expectations! Lewis moved, Gagne seconded to approve the City of Shorewood Statement of Purpose. Motion carried - 5/0 3. Update on Public Works facility Hurm said OSM is doing the grading and utility work on the project. 4. Update on 1992 Budget Staff Engineer Proposal Hurm said a study determined that a staff Engineer can be cost effective. The Engineer would not replace the consulting Engineer. He said 11 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 12 the Consulting Engineer would handle special projects. It would be advantageous to have an engineer at the City hall to handle problems. Daugherty asked if the budget can support this expenditure. Hurm said the figure he proposed is a conservative figure and their is a need for a staff Engineer. It can be included in the 1992 budget without increasing the property tax levy. Lewis asked if an engineer in the $42,000 to $48,000 range could handle the job. Hurm said the figure is not high but within range. Gagne said they should keep the consultant. Daugherty said he is not in favor of hiring someone in 1991. Stover said the City should wait until there is more of a need. Brancel moved, Lewis seconded to add a Staff Engineer position to the 1992 budget. Motion carried - 3/2 (Gagne, Stover) 5. Munitech Hurm said a pressure problem occurred in the S. E. Area during flushing. Some basements were flooded. Dresel said there have been %ther problems in that area. He said if a valve is turned off too fast this can happen. Lewis asked if there is a problem with the system. Dresel said there are area of high and low elevation and there has to be careful operation of the valve. 16. COUNCIL REPORTS. A. MAYOR BRANCEL 1. Report of the October 16, 1991 - SLMPSD Coordinating Committee Meeting. Brancel said the 1992 SLMPSD contract has the same language as previous contracts but will be for a longer period of time. B. COUNCIER GAGNE No report. 1 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 - PAGE 13 C. COUNCILMEMBER STOVER Stover said a resident-called City Hall for the time of the Public Hearing on the water system and was given incorrect information. She said the Staff should be correctly informed. D. COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS No report. E. COUNCILMEMBER DAUGHERTY No report. 17. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO THE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS i Stover moved, Gagne seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:36 P.M. Motion carried - 5/0 GENERAL AND LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NUMBER 00- 00166 -02 Checks issued since October 11, 1991 Check No. 7767 -7808 LIQUOR $ 46,760.10 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED Checks for Council approval Checks No. 7810 -7846 CHECK REGISTER FOR OCTOBER 22 1991 PAYROLL Checks no. 205565/205599 LIQUOR $3,307.87 1 •= GENERAL $ 234,051.32 $280,811.42 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL $ 64,820.08 TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST $345,631.50 GENERAL $12,847.30 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED $16,155.17 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 1991 — PAGE 14 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Katie Snyder Recording Secretary MAYOR BARBARA BRANCEL CITY ADMINISTRATOR JAMES HURM • 14 CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 M I N U T E S CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:57 PM by Mayor Brancel. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel, Councilmembers Stover, Daugherty, and Lewis; Engineer Dresel; Planner Nielsen; Finance Director Rolek; and Recording Secretary Niccum Absent: Councilmember Gagne PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 115 -91 FOR PROJECT NO. 91 -11, WATERMAIN EXTENSION, STREET CONSTRUCTION AND APPURTENANT WORK, PINE BEND AND HOWARD'S POINT ROADS Residents Bill Keeler, John Einhorn, and Phil Bortscheller were present. Nine out of eleven residents affected by the project signed a petition. Daugherty moved, Lewis seconded, to approve Resolution No. 155 -91, a "Resolution Approving Special Assessments for Project No. 91 -11 Watermain, Street Construction and Related Work, Pine Bend and Howard's Point Roads" for a 10 year period at 7.5% interest. Motion carried - 4/0. ADJOURNMENT Lewis moved, Daugherty seconded, to adjourn to the Minnewashta School for the 7:30 PM Public Information meeting. Motion carried -4/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Susan A. Niccum, Secretary ADMINISTRATOR JAMES C. HURM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 6:30 PM MAYOR BARBARA BRANCEL f CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 M I N U T E S CALL TO ORDER MINNEWASHTA SCHOOL 26350 SMITHTOWN ROAD 7:30 PM The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Mayor Brancel. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel, Councilmembers Stover, Gagne, Daugherty, and Lewis; Attorney Sellergren; Engineer Dresel; Planner Nielsen; Finance Director Rolek; Administrator Hurm; and Recording Secretary Niccum PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING ON THE PROPOSAL FOR EXPANSION OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR'S PRESENTATION Mayor Brancel introduced James Hurm, Shorewood's City Administrator. Hurm explained that two newsletters went out before the public information meeting and the October 1991 newsletter listed the different considerations that the City Council is looking at regarding water. He asked people to sign in and fill out the public input sheets. Hurm then gave a short presentation. He said why consider a water expansion at this point? The Council is responsible for $.17 - .18 out of the property tax dollar. This amount is not only the General Operating Fund, but also covers Capital Projects. The Council is trying to form a financial plan, a 5 year capital improvement plan, to best utilize this amount in a way that will keep the tax bill relatively consistent, without significant fluctuations. In order to do this, they must review the status of not only the water system, but sewer, streets, parks, drainage, public facilities and equipment. They have to plan construction projects. Shorewood is ,.eligible for State Aid Highway Funding on certain streets. It is important to get any underground work done so when these. streets are ready to be repaired, State Aid Funds can be used instead of Shorewood's tax dollars. These are the main reasons the City is reviewing a municipal water system at this time. The Council reviewed a number of different proposals, looked at different projections, and came up with a very preliminary proposal for public input. • To assess those who would benefit *excludes those already on the water system *excludes the islands • Total cost of project estimated at $13,000,000 • Accomplish over a 3 year period • Two - thirds assessed-to property owner as line goes by • One -third paid out of water revenues from water system • Total assessment approximately $4,800 for each unit, $800 for trunk main and storage, $4,000 for watermain (lateral) installation. • • Each lot is a unit, if a property owner has several lots, each one would be assessed. • 15 year period • 1 /15th of principal each year, with interest on the unpaid balance (you always have the option of paying up -front without interest) • Commercial property would have a commercial multiplier • Combined service reduction for multi - family units • "Development Neutral" • Only assess current parcels, at time of division assess additional lots • Hookup required with 5 years of time water becomes available • Private.wells could be kept for outside purposes • Deferral for elderly, handicapped, and low income if possible% Hurm reminded the public that the Council has not made up their minds, that they are asking for public input to help them do so. Hurm- discussed wells vs.- city water, he said the Council felt fire fighting services were important and said the Fire Marshall is present to answer any questions regarding fire insurance. The Council also felt Citywide water would be an important tool in lowering the metro water system cost. CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 3 The existing water system would be more reliable, and work better on a full system. On the other hand, the City would be dug up for 3 years, messy and inconvenient. Some people don't like fluorine or chlorine. Some people prefer private wells. Engineer Dresel reviewed approximate pumping costs per hour for varying horsepower used to run a well. Costs could vary from using a 0.5HP motor 1 hour a day for 365 days for a total of $18.25, to using a 1-.OHP motor 4 hours a day for 365 days for a total of $146. PUBLIC INPUT Jim Hamsta - 23930 Yellowstone Trail - said he would be in favor of • a sound water plan, but is not convinced the proposed plan is the best compromise. He referred to Boulder Bridge well as a bad example, and the S.E. Area system as a good example. He asked if the S. E. Area was the only system, if the water deficit would be as big? Finance Director Rolek said it's the most viable system, but it also has the most equipment. Hamsta asked about the maintenance costs. Engineer Dresel said right now the existing wells were set up to handle the whole city. Boulder Bridge and Badger wells would be alternated and a tower would be built somewhere on the west end of Shorewood. Hamsta asked if, because of the pneumatic system constantly switching on and off and causing wear and tear, a complete water system might actually lower maintenance costs. Engineer Dresel said yes. Hamsta said he believes putting in a trunk system is a good deal for Shorewood, and he doesn't object to paying a $800 -$1000 assessment, however, it would tear up his yard, he would lose trees, it will not increase the value of his house. The cost of hooking up is not mentioned in the newsletter, and he would like to see a report giving hookup costs. He.said if you sell your house or remortgage, you do not.have 5 years to hook up, if the line is within 200' of your house, you must hook up immediately, therefore, until you connect, your house is actually- depreciated by the "improvement ". In his opinion, the problems in Shorewood can be solved with a trunk system, and - extensions of the laterals and actual connections should remain on a petition basis, that .will put the common problem, which is the trunk system, on all the taxpayers in the city'.- where it belongs; it will put the cost of connecting and laterals on the developers, or people who have well problems; and the true "operational costs should be borne by the users of the system'. Capi"tal, subsidy should not be built into the operation costs: This would be a viable compromise. Mary 'Hermann - 20790 Idlewild Path - 21 years in Shorewood, has attended 3 water hearings. She said the Council is holding her future in their hands with 5 votes, and she wanted them to answer CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - "WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 4 some questions. She asked the total number of homestead properties in the City, the number of assessable units in the proposal for water, the 1990 census per capita income of the households in Shorewood. She said she had a lot of problems with the newsletter: that the bottom line cost is actually $8,000, not $4,800; that she did her own research on the pump costs that were referred to in the newsletter, if you run an average water pump on an average well, it pumps 10 -12 gallons per minute - 2 hours a day would be $159 per quarter - 6 hours a day, $411 - totally unaffordable; -scare tactics were used - contaminated wells ... there hasn't been a contaminated well in the lake area in 15 years, - existing water systems... all backed into... none planned by the City ... all lemons - State Aid dollars ... when the sewer was put in, it was run down the middle of the street, therefore water lines would have to run down either side of the street. Scattered petitions... these people should live in a community with water, and see what happens the first time they backflush. How much has the City cost us already for research into water before finding out if we wanted it? She did not feel the Council gave her direct answers to her questions. Mike Pierro - 5880 Christmas Lake Road - asked what percentage of Shorewood's roads would be covered by State Aid? Engineer Dresel answered approximately 9 miles out of approximately 38 miles. Pierro also questioned hookup charges. Dresel said between $500 and $1,500, average $1,000.• Pierro said he called a large plumbing company and received a quote of $900 for up to 45' if it was a new house and water was in the street. He asked if the City was running the service to the lot lines. Engineer Dresel said yes. Pierro read a quote "No one will be assessed for water if they don't want it, and no resident will be forced to hook up to a central well that has their own individual well, and that is the policy of this Council" (1980). Mayor Brancel said she wanted to clarify that this is not a formal public it is a preliminary public hearing that the City set up to gather public input before spending any more money. Dan Haugen - 20050 Excelsior Boulevard - pointed out the interest cost that will be added to the $4,800. He asked who would regulate the assessment costs if they increase. Hurm said there would be a preliminary hearing where the engineers would give their cost estimates, bids would be taken, -and we'd go ahead with the proposal, which calls for $4,800 assessment. Hurm said we would have to talk to the City Attorney, but he thought it would be city policy to follow the $800 and $4,000 assessments. If the cost came in higher, the properties would have already been assessed, so the Council would have to determine how else to raise revenues. Haugen spoke of his experiences with the City of y • • CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 5 Victoria water service and expressed concern over regulation of quarterly utility rates, who would control them, and if the one - third that the residents aren't being assessed, would raise this rate excessively. He said paying for a water system, that a lot of people don't need and don't want, could change the quality of life for his children due to financial hardship. Ken Schmitt - 5465 Grant Lorenz Road - thanked the staff and Council for keeping him informed, but said he didn't agree. He presented some "givens ". MSA doesn't depend on the City water system but functions independently. The debt of the existing system is not the well owner's cause or problem. Individual wells are no more or less safe than a city system. Fire has been dealt with up to now... effectively? Developers act in their own • interest, not the homeowners. Development neutral ... need better information. He said he didn't need a $13,000,000 debt over 15 years, or to buy what he already has. Muriel Vogel - 19795 Excelsior Boulevard - said she has a 6 400' deep well that runs 4 times a day and gives her 54 gallons a minute. She had iron... she called Culligan. She said if it ain't broke ... don't fix it. She said they can't spend $10,000 on a 100 year old house, couldn't have that expense hanging over their heads, and implored the Council not to put in water. R. A. Bowman - 20025 Manor Road - said the interest, at 10% on $13,000,000 would be $1,300,000 a year. He raised the issue because he understands the water fund has a $243,000 deficit. He didn't know if this is an annual recurring or cumulative deficit, but if it is recurring, the interest on construction is 5 times larger, therefore taking on this amount to save the water fund deficit is highly questionable. No homeowner who has studied this, could favor this proposal economically, the savings is tiny. We have to depend on our elected officials. Because the economics are so bad, they would have to be coerced into approving this proposal. The roads in Shorewood have character the way they are, we don't' need State Aid spec roads that are 50' wide. Ed Snyder - 26640 Smithtown Road - said he.was on the Financial Advisory Board, which was dismissed at a time when the City was looking at some of these improvements. He said the Board, as financial people, were trying to give guidance to the City and apparently, with these type of items coming up, they didn't want the input. Snyder asked that his above statement go on record. He also wanted hook up cost information. He asked how average usage was figured. Finance Director Rolek explained. He said that didn't tell him anything. Snyder said he can't afford it. He also asked for an informal poll before leaving the school. CITY; OP SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 6 Mayor Brancel said yes, the Financial Advisory Board was dissolved, there was some poor attendance on the Board, and what they decided to do was go to an ad hoc committee format if needed. Dale Evans - 5425 Grant Lorenz Road - asked how the $4,800 was determined, if it was based on the number of units that do not have water at this time. Rolek said basically, yes, they looked at a couple of factors ... what are we charging for a hook up fee right now - ($4,000 set 5 -6 years ago ... At this point Evans said if this is a Shorewood problem, all residents should be involved in paying for it, if they can vote, they should pay. Ron Pitts - 5980 Christmas Lake Road asked what instigated bringing up water again? Mayor Brancel said the City started a capital improvement program. In order to do any long range planning they have to look at all possible capital improvements and make decisions... are we going to continue with the systems we have, which are running a cumulative deficit ... or change, and that's why the City is asking for input. If not, what are they going to do with the existing wells that cannot pay for themselves ?. Pitts asked if, when the original wells were planned, did the Council figure they would pay for themselves? Stover said none of the present Council was involved, it was before their time. Pitts said they moved to Shorewood because of the way it is, and they'd like to see it stay that way, don't want to lose 'trees, have a mess, encourage more developers, or see more strip malls or fast food franchises. Don Willis 24835 Yellowstone Trail - said Minnesota is the highest taxed state in the nation, bankruptcies are at an all time high, the economy is bad, and people are losing jobs every day. He talked to 3 people at the Board of Health who said Shorewood has superior water quality, soil, good aquifers, and no contamination. He said he can't imagine how developers can exert enough pressure on the Council to push this through. 70% of the people are on wells, and they don't want water. Allen McKinney - 4925 Rustic Way - said last time this ,issue came up he talked to about 150 people around the Lake William area, none of them wanted water. He suggested letting the residents vote on it He, said in 10 years all the wells will have to be capped anyway because people will run extra water into the sewer. He said all the homeowners didn't know about the meeting. He urged those present to spread the word. Ed Bergslein - 24780 Smithtown Road - said he hasn't paid one penny in repairs since he put his well in 1968, and he's raised 4 girls and 3 boys and never had a lack of water.. so what the h... does he want a city water system for. He's retired , living on a fixed CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 7 income, and needs more expenses like he needs a hole in the head. He told the Council, now listen to us,.damn you,,I'm mad at you. Barney Hiding - 8855 Strawberry Lane -asked what the total cost is to operate the system per year. Rolek said approximately$150000. :Hiding then asked how many homes are serviced for $150,000? Rolek said somewhat over 700. Hidding asked what that balanced out to per year? Rolek said about $200 a home. Hiding said then you could, over a 10 year period of time, buy wells for those 700 people and forget the whole thing, right? - Hiding then mentioned the 8% interest, saying very good cities '(he didn't know where Shorewood qualifies) get 5.6 %, and asked what Shorewood was going to do with the 43% profit? And why? Hurm said he thought they were being conservative, interest would probably be 7% to 7.5 %. • Hurm said usually a municipality will add on 1% - 2% for the actual cost of the interest rate that they receive when they sell the bonds, but when you have a large project that amount can be small, so hopefully, it would be less than 8 %. Rolek said the bonds could be sold now for 5.6 %, but what it will be in 3 years is another story, you are dealing with market conditions and that fluctuates - he said the newsletter figure of 8% was just an example. Hidding asked if the $13,000,000 is just for the 1600 homes. Rolek said it would be to complete the system for the whole city. Hidding asked the approximately 150 people present to give a show of hands, who was for water .... two people raised their hands. Alan Yelsey - 5481 Grant Lorenz Road - said it seemed to him there are two issues, how to optimize the use of dollars for the roads, and how to make sure the current water system doesn't get away from us, and yet, deliver quality water to the people that are already hooked up. He said he is for that, and is willing to be taxed to • adequately support the people that are currently on municipal water. He said he figured it out and it would be about $17,000 out of pocket expense over 15 years for everyone that had to hook up to the discussed water system. He felt that the newsletter did not present the bottom line when it came to cost. He said he had talked with the Council members, found them quite knowledgeable and informed, and suggested that other members of the audience contact them. Bryan Benson - 4685 Fatima Place - Likes well water, doesn't like chlorine. Doesn't want to spend more money to cover up mistakes. Patrick Collins - 4675 Fatima Place - feels the developers, if they are culpable, should get the wells they built back in shape. He said he works for St. Louis Park, and.they had some serious water problems. Lets not go after the residents, but after whoever created the problem in the first place CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 8 Mary Borgeson - 5485 Grant Lorenz Road - said she bought her home because her whole front yard is full of trees that she doesn't want to lose. She came to the City and asked about water proposals and was told it has been voted down every time it's come up. She demanded to know how much it would cost a family of four for water,. stating that if they could give an estimate on well usage, they could also give an estimate on water usage. Stover asked if 20,000 gallons wasn't the yearly average. Rolek said it is more like a quarterly average, and would cost $36 a quarter, but it varies, more water is used in the summer. He. said the City average is 21,000+ a quarter. She also questioned what would happen if there is a watering ban. She said Minnetonka police shut down someone who was using their well and wondered if this could happen to her. She demanded a promise from this council and all future councils that she could keep using her $3800 well until it ran out. Hurm said no one can make that promise. She also stated she wanted to • go on record as being against City water. She informed the Council they had better find a fair way to solve the deficit because she doesn't think she should have to pay for somebody elses water. Duncan Storlie - 5375 Eureka Road —said this is the 3rd time water has been discussed, and the "mindset" of the Council seems to be inevitable. If wells were built to serve the whole city, why don't they just make a decision once and for all. He asked the Council who has wells and who is on the current water system. 3 have wells, 2 are on the system. He asked if a hydrological study had been done, and how stable the aquifers are. Engineer Dresel said a study has been done, but not specifically on the aquifers. Storlie mentioned the fire situation, saying $13,000,000 can buy some really big tanker trucks. He mentioned to the audience that it is illegal to drain your sump pump into the sewer, and suggested the City check for this to cut down on the amount of water going into the metro sewer system. - 0 specifications are. Dresel said 28' in width with curb and gutter. He informed her that Birch Bluff Road is not on the schedule for the next 5 years, and that the City has discussed dropping it from the State Aid Street List. Peggy Mullenberg - 25700 Birch Bluff Road - was concerned about Birch Bluff Road being widened, and asked what State Aid Lohr LeSueur - 5925 Ridge Road - said he paid $4500 to have his well put in, and didn't see how City water would benefit him. He asked if the City has looked at other alternatives? Would there be a vote? What steps would the City take if they decided for water? Hurm said if it was considered feasible to have citywide water, it would be included in the Capital Improvement. system, preliminary plans and designs would be done, and there would be a preliminary hearing would be held next spring. CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4 1991 - Page 9 n U • Tony Braysen - 5955 Ridge Road - thanked the Council for coming to the meeting. He stated "In order to keep a financially viable system, all residents will have to hook up to the system ". Dave Hanson - 5920 Covington Road - said he is so new he is still unpacking boxes. He is already hooked into the water system, the water quality is not good, and ,a water treatment plant is already being built to improve the water. He would like to see Shorewood keep it's quaintness. Denise Hanus - 6095 Lake Linden Drive - asked the audience to urge their friends and neighbors to attend the next meeting. Muriel Vogel asked if the S. E. Area Iron Removal Plant will be added to the $13,000,000, and if another one will have to be built for Boulder Bridge? Dresel said the water at Boulder Bridge does not have a high iron content, and probably will not need a Finance Director Rolek said a $1,000,000 amount has been added to the projection for an iron removal plant on the west end, this is not included in the $13,000,000, and would be paid by water revenues. The S.E. Area Plant will not be added to the $13,000,000. Linda Haugen - 20050 Excelsior Boulevard - asked who makes the final decision? Does her vote count? Mayor Brancel said yes, her vote counts, but it hasn't been opened up to a formal referendum because this is an informal hearing. Brancel said it's the Council's decision right now based on the input they have received. She said the Councilmembers would give their opinion when the residents finished speaking, and this might answer resident's questions. Rick Dyer 6070 Brand Circle - pointed out that in the newsletter it mentioned that the Council was responsible for 18% of the property tax, he said in 1983 this figure was 12% and the City doubled it to pay off the water deficit. He asked what happened to all the money, and why is there still a deficit? He suggested the City check with the City of Carver. He said taking the average Shorewood combination, the mentioned the water /sewer bill would be $87, he compared other cities sewer /water bills, Tonka Bay - $70, Excelsior - $50, Chanhassen - $43, and Minnetonka - $30.75, saying he knew of no other community with a rate as high as Shorewood's proposed rate. He asked the Council to look at all sides and try to make the best decision for Shorewood. Pete Holmberg - 5955 Cajed Lane - asked if developers are required to put in a municipal water system, or if they can sell individual lots and let people put in individual wells? Brancel said they can sell individual lots. CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 10 COUNCIL INPUT Mayor Brancel said she was very interested in hearing 'the public input, that's why she wanted this meeting before anything else went on. She said she assumed, after sitting through all other water meetings as a resident, that this was not going to fly, that no one's attitude had really changed. She said we are a rural community, and we'd like to stay that way. She said, based`'on the public input, she would vote no against the water. stover said this is her ninth year on the Council, she has never supported city water, and she sees no reason to change. Gagne said he has been here since 1961. He told Mr. Dyer that he was on the Council at the time the City increased the taxes. He explained that they were increased because the State Auditor, Arne Carlson, told the City they either increased the taxes, or the State would take over the City. He said the situation was created in the first place because previous Councils did not do what they were supposed to do regarding taxing. . Gagne said he has his own private well, he put a new one in 3 years ago. He said he has been to 3 of these meetings, starting in the 1970's when they started talking about sewer. He said at that time he raised his hand and asked, how about water? He said they almost threw him out the door! He said there are people in this town who want water, but they will not come to the meeting because they get hollered at and harassed. He said they do call him on the phone, so he will be more interested in the results of the private poll conducted in people's private homes. He said he still has an open mind but he wants to wait until the other report comes in. Rob Daugherty said there was a lot of discussion this evening about why the overall concept of a water system came up. He said one of the reasons he ran for Council was because he had a lot of input from other people in Shorewood basically stating that the Council needed to look forward, and do a lot of planning, and make sure that the path the City would follow would make logical sense. This is why he felt it would make sense to look into a water system, look at the costs of a water system. He said there has been some discussion on the current costs of the water system, and what those costs could be 5 years down the road, -and what the potential costs of a City system could be 5 years down the road compared to what they are now, that he'd hate to be here 5 years from now - after having the majority of public input say no. to water - and be looking at a PCA mandate that citywide water must be installed at a cost of $25,000,000, because that would be an even greater hardship. Daugherty said he has an open mind to the overall water C7 system, that it is obvious that the majority here is against a CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 11 citywide system. He said that, based on some projections the City has done, an overall water system may make sense to the City of Shorewood... however, if the citizens of Shorewood do not feel it is within their best interest to do so at this time, he guessed he would follow this mandate. He said when the results of the poll come back, if they are 50/50, he feels strongly that the 'issue should be explored at greater length by a referendum. 1. Daugherty, in answer to questions, said he has lived in the City for 3.5 years, has City water, and with five children pays approximately $125 -225 quarterly for water. Hurm said the poll was doing a random sampling of approximately 200 phone numbers in Shorewood, and will show the choices of people on wells and on City water, so you will be able to tell on both sides. Daugherty said he was looking forward to the session tonight to see what he would learn, and he feels he learned a lot. Dan Lewis said the information meeting is also on behalf of the Council, it benefits them, they gain input from the residents which allows them to decide what is best for Shorewood. He said he was leaning toward water as a capital improvement project program, but with the input tonight, perhaps he is leaning against it a little bit. He said it deserves a lot more investigation, maybe they can look at some type of scaled -down program that would benefit the City in the long run at a lower cost. He said he would like to see more people at other meetings, the Council needs public input. AUDIENCE QUESTIONS TO COUNCIL Paul Thulen - 26390 Noble Road — said he didn't feel he got clear answers from Gagne, Daugherty, and Lewis as to where they stand. Gagne and Lewis said they have an open mind at this point and are waiting for more information. Barney Hidding asked how much money has already been spent, and wouldn't it be easier to just put it on the ballot? Hurm said poll was $3,300, and he doesn't have all costs at this time. Alan Yelsey said he had yet to hear enough facts and information. He asked if he could have access to list of people present, and encouraged those present to talk to their Councilmembers. He also asked about the poll. Mayor Brancel said the poll is not completed yet, the Administrator will have the poll results when completed. Mike Pierro asked Gagne what response he would consider significant. Gagne said he this is.the first preliminary hearing, CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1991 - Page 12 he is concerned about fire, and he will not make a decision tonight, or until he has all the facts. Pierro expressed concern over whether the poll will be accurate. Bob Belbeck said he knows about water and it is ridiculous to discuss contamination. He also said that the survey is meaningless, and biased. Pat Theide - Glen Road asked Gagne how many -calls he's had? Gagne said at this time about 5 against and about 15 for. She urged calling Council. It was her opinion that the women will give answers, the men are political and refuse to give answers. Mary Borgeson at 5485 Grant Lorenz asked why people who already have water are being asked if they want it. Stover said, from talking to people, people who have water do always answer yes. Other residents asked questions from the audience without speaking from the podium. Lewis said his job is to decide what is good for the City of Shorewood, not what is good for him. Planning for the future is also part of their job. He again encouraged the residents to attend more meetings. Bill Vogel - 21000 Ivy Lane encouraged the Council to put out another newsletter, with more detail, and thanked the Council. Mayor Brancel reminded the residents that the water issue requires a 4/5 vote of the Council. Alan Yelsey said at this discussion is about reasoning with the precious - dollars and resources in Shorewood. He would like to hear logical explanations regarding water, for or against. Jim Hamsta said everyone gets to vote in elections, that's why everyone is being polled. He said it is not an easy job to be on the Council and encouraged the residents to give the Council a chance to do their job. CITY OF SHOREWOOD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - WATER ISSUE MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4 1991 - Page 13 ADJOURNMENT Q Gagne moved, Daugherty seconded, to adjourn the Special Council meeting of November 4, 1991 at 10:50 PM. Motion carried - 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Susan A. Niccum, Secretary ADMINISTRATOR JAMES C. HURM • MAYOR BARBARA BRANCEL �J CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB'ROAD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1991 PAGE 1 M I N U T E S 1• CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brancel called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. A. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Brancel, Councilmembers Gagne, Stover, Daugherty and Lewis, City Administrator Hurm. 2. INTERVIEWS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES The Council interviewed the following candidates for the Planning Commission vacancies. 1. Doug Malam 2. Jack Hansen 3. Gerald Goodlund 4. Tim Ryan 5. Deborah Borkon 6. Bob Bean 3. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M. and reconvened at 8:43 P.M in the Council Chambers. 4. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD WATER SYSTEM RESEARCH PROJECT. A. REVIEW AGENDA Gagne moved, Stover seconded to adopt the Agenda. Motion carried — 5/0. Judith Marshik presented the findings of the Water System Research Project. She said they interviewed 200 residents and there were two qualifying questions. 1. Did the resident own property in Shorewood 2. Did they receive the information mailed out by the City. She said 30% of those interviewed are on City water and 70% are on well systems. She said 141 of the 200 residents are on well systems and most have had City water at some time. The average cost for a well was $395 and this is high because it includes well repair. One half of the 141 residents had made a mayor investment in their well in the last five 1 � �j SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1991 — PAGE 2 years. She said 3/4 of the number had tested their wells for Purity in the last five years. Marshik said all the respondents are softening there water systems and 1/3 are treating for iron. There was a lot of comment on iron content. She said 85% were satisfied with the water quality and 91% with their - current system. Marshik referred to Table 5 and stated that 60% of the residents questioned opposed the Capital Investment in a City Water System and 34.5% supported. This percentage was reversed when they asked if they supported or opposed a five year conversion plan and assessing the cost to all properties. Table six broke down the reasons for support or opposition. The two main reasons were the high cost of assessment and the system and why should I pay if I have my own system. Table seven broke down the changes the City should make in the propos� water system. 46% suggested no change. Table eight detailed the length of residency of respondents, 13.4 years. The average age of the respondent was 47. The number of adults living in the household — 159 of respondents said two. The household income was 25.1% over $50,000 and 26.7% over $90,000. Table nine broke the City into geographic areas. Zone 10 had 23% of the respondents. The use of the walking /biking trail for snowmobiles was opposed by 54% of the respondents. The last question was who shared responsibility for taxes in the household. This question was asked to eliminate adult children who did not pay taxes on the property. Councilmember Daugherty asked the percentage of error in the survey. Marshik said it has not been calculated but it was about 4 -5%. Stover asked if the questions were read over the phone. She thought some of them were ambiguous. Marshik said the questions were tested-on the Planning Commission and they had no problem with them. Marshik said they sent out packets to people who did not have the information and then called them again. She said there was a high compliance with this survey. Table 10 broke down the respondents according to their use of City Water or Well system, major investment in a well, length of residency. Residents on a well system opposed the capital expenditure and those who have made an investment in their wells. Respondents who have lived over 10 years in Shorewood opposed the expenditure. Table 12 broke down the City by geographic zones. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1991 - PAGE 3 Marshik said the zones without water generally opposed the system. There were a large number of respondents from zone 10 and she will check with Nielsen concerning the population in that zone and possibly make adjustments. Marshik said she would like another session with the Council to further discuss the findings. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Brancel said there are two openings, one from the Islands and one from the S. E. Area of the City. She said the applicants were very well qualified and the decision was hard to make. The two new appointments are: Douglas Malam, 6140 McKinley Court and Jack Hanson - Shady Island. Stover moved, Gagne seconded to direct the Staff to draw up a resolution appointing Douglas Malam and Jack Hanson to the Planning Commission. Motion carried - 4/1 (Daugherty) Gagne said the applicants were very good and Stover said these applications should be kept on file for future openings on City commissions. Daugherty explained his nay vote. He said he wanted the best candidates chosen regardless of where they resided. He said the terms of the Planning Commission should be reviewed and perhaps limited to 2 to 3 years so that other residents can have an opportunity to serve. Brancel agreed with his recommendation. However, she said they had advertised for applicants from certain sections of the City and could not change their minds. She said the Council should discuss this further. Stover said experience on the Planning Commission is very helpful and she is against limiting terms. She said the matter should be discussed at another meeting. Lewis said the City limits itself by asking for candidates from specific areas; there is more merit to choosing the best qualified. He supports limiting terms. He said times and people change and does not think this kicks off any members but allows fresh ideas on the Commission. Stover said they should then consider limiting the Park Commission and Council terms. Lewis said that may occur. Brancel said they should discuss this among the Council and not refer to the Park or Planning Commissions for input. Lewis said it would not hurt for these Commission to review this idea. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1991 — PAGE 4 Daugherty said there could be a provision for running more than a 2 or 3 year term subject to Council review. Gagne said the matter should be reviewed and discussed before there is another opening. Brancel said the staff can be directed to bring options to the Council. Lewis said there was a tie between the Planning Commission applicants but he voted for applicants from the specific areas. 6. ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, Lewis seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:43 P.M. Motion carried — 5/0 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Katie Snyder Recording Secretary ATTEST: BARBARA BRANCEL, MAYOR JAMES C. HURM, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 4 NOV— 1 1 -7 1 r'lU r-a a 49 F 02 PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST Contractor: Date: November 11 1991 A -& Construction Project Estimate 9038;- 110th Street North No.: 91458 No.: 4 Stillwater, MN 55082 From October 11, 1991 Owner or Purchaser: City.of Shorewood To November 8 1991 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 DETAILED ESTIMATE VALUE COMP. WORK'DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST COMP. WORK See attached $337,000.00 83% $279,997.30 Original Contract Cost $337,000.00 • Approved Contract Amendments: .No. No. No. $337,000.00 SUMMARY Value of completed work and materials stored . . . . . 2$ 79,9 Less retained percentage (5 %) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,999.87 Net amount due including this estimate . . . . . . . . 2$ 65,9 Less estimate previously approved: No. 1 8- -14 -91 $46,180.21 No. 6 No. 2. 9 -16 -91 25,993.19 No. 7 No. 3 10 -1091 18 No. 8 No. 4. No. 9 No. 5 No.10 Total Previous Estimates. . $90,814._68 Net Amount Due this Estimate. $175,182.75 Contractor: Approved: ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS, INC. BY: BY: Noel W. Vogen, P.E. Date: Date: November 11 , 1991 MON 8 50 P 03 ra.;� •/- �I-h 1 39 A &IC I _-OFi =:T -R1JCT I ON COST MQKDM i sassT 1 ar INssT ESTIMATE FOR. P ARTIAL PAYMENT NUMBER FOUR (4) FOA THt FEA100-- net.nrar 1L 1941 TO jare baz A. 1 q 9 1 INCL, Pond & Tnaurance Demolition Bldg. X c&v. & Sack Fil ConcretO work Maaoruy ,Tfork VanpproofinR Frecast ;Floor Slab Prec aat :Roos' Slab Roofin4 & Sheet Metpl Carpentr7 Door & Hardware CauikinA Paintin.a,. 141so. Kotgls, Ladder, 0 Bilco Fta,tc Landaca�inq 14uvers , Ile Qa „ era Rst4init R Afall Tonka Filtmi & AccesAoz Filter Media Haul I S Qt a LoWl 711tez Filter ;Jxlves T'lowmete race Piping, Chemical U.G. Pipe, Fittings &1 Above mound Pipe, Fitt Air operated Sludge Pur, Recyclin4 Pump Two (2) Sumps ElectrioAl OCTAILiD ESTIMATE ITtj NO. CGl�CF11lTIgN NO. alp VNIT• UNIT t'nICL 1 , 2, 3. 4. 5• 7. A . , 9. 10. 11. 12, 13• 14, 15. 1�. 17, 18. l9. 20. 21, 22. 23. 24. 25, 26. 27, 2A. Total Contract Amount inq S , Aresktor eed Ive nre & val, Toy. al completed to dat4 t COMTOACT AMOUNT WORK PKAFORMED TO DAYR No. VNlTs I AMOUNT 9ARNZ0 do 5,977 aa LL 1 000. 00 6 , 90 0.00 37,375.00 11 1 25a.00 1,15.4.00 4,600.00 4, 600. ca 5,390.00 1,380-00 1,100.00 660.00 A, 116.00 1,150. CO 1,438.00 A, 500.00 1,100,00 6 115 ,762. 00 a,389.00 6 } 45,489-00 11,000.00 tee 23904 1, 540.00 1, 540. CEO 440.00 14,000.00 $337,000,CO 5,97 ?.(In 4.000. F 901^. no '7, Q, 00-.40 1,150. 0,0 4, A 00. 1,1A0. 0n 990.00 1,150.00 1 41R. 00 5 0 950.()0 990.00 5,200 -00 1 0 4,IA5.oO 7,550,10 F,A no. oo 4G,940.1n 11, cco.00 1,45A. 1 ,10 . 00 1,1 AA 00 198 . (:0 7,nCC 279,4 1 ^n 1 nc� 1 ^t� 1 �0 00 90 1C4 70 on 1 :'011 oC 1 15 5.1 J 1A 0 IV — 1 1 1"1 4 H 1 5 1 P 0-* — 1 F R I 1 1 = 40 r+�LK co"STRUC T ION P 4 STATUS Ole` CONTRACT Original Contract Amount — $337 nM. 00 Extras apprpvcd to date Credits approved to date Net amount of Contract this date _ Certificate of the Contractor or his Authorized Representative To the best of my knowledge and belief, X certify that all items, units, quandtics and prices of work itnd material shown on the l ace of Sheets Nn. and_:.._._ _ _......of this Pariodiral Estimate are correct, that all work has been performed And materials supplied in full accordanre with the terms =d conditions of the corresponding t;orvtruttion cnn- W t documents between -MY Of (gwntr) and A h X �onatruation, Inc, , date dure j k , 19- and all tuthoriTed changes thereto; that the following is a true and correct statement of the cc tract account up to, stnd including, the l ut day of the period rovertd by this estirnste, and that no part of the "�{t+t ount due" h a been received. Authorized Represent ti Y tZohn H. Adomart rP Pn A *m- A 4 (a) 'Total af'nount earned ................. ..... . , .............. , .......$ 279 99 7. 30 _ Retained.... ..... , ... . , ... .... . . .....$ 13 499. ,. (c) Total tamed less remind percentage . ,$ 25 497.4 r (d) 'Total prevloully apptaved ........... I.......... ........... ......s g o, s1 -L. I %R (c) Amount date this estimate .. ....................... . ... ..... ..$ Z75 142.75 ., n Appoved as to quantities and estimate dues Superintendent of Construction Architect ^_ Supervising Engineer RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES WHEREAS, NORTH SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. (Applicant) has an interest in certain land within the City of Shorewood and has applied to the Council for preliminary approval of a plat to be known as Shorewood Suburban Estates.; and WHEREAS, Applicant's request has been reviewed by the City Planner and his recommendations have been duly set forth in a Memorandum to the Planning Commission dated 2 July 1990, which Memorandum is on file at City Hall; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Shorewood Planning Commission on 5 November 1991, for which notice was duly published and all adjacent property owners duly notified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That Applicant's request for preliminary plat approval of Shorewood Suburban Estates is hereby granted. 2. That such approval is subject to the recommendations set forth in the City Planner's Memorandum dated 2 July 1990 attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A and the terms and conditions contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of 5 November 1991 on file at City Hall. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of November, 1991. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator /Clerk C3 � - MAYOR ` v Barb Brancet COUNCIL - Kristi Stover - Bob Gagne i Rob Daugherty I - . �, ,. r -' Daniel Lewis _ r CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 ,COUNTRY -CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 (612) 474 -3236 n MEMORANDUM TO: - - Planning Commission,' Mayor and City Council FROM: Patti Helgesen DATE: -23 October 1991 - RE: Shorewood Suburban Estates - .Preliminary Plat' FILE NO.: 405 (91.18) In September of -1990 the City Council granted final plat approval for this project which consists of 11 Single - Family Residential lots. At that time the developer was unable to provide the Letter of Credit for the project, and therefore unable to record the plat. with the County. As time elapsed, the project expired. Some preliminary grading was started on the site without a permit, and as a consequence, any reapplication requires that a Letter of Credit be posted. The City now has a Letter of Credit from the developer as well as a signed development _ agreement, which will be updated as part of the final plat, and he wishes to reprocess the preliminary plat application. There have been no changes proposed to the original plat approved last year. The staff report which, addresses the preliminary plat, dated 2 July 1990, is attached for your review. BJN:ph cc:. James Hurm Joel Dresel - Dave Sellergren Jack Menkveld Pete Kociscak , ,. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore h' J MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten MEMORANDUM CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 -3236 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 2 JULY 1990 RE: SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAT FILE NO.: 405 (90.14) BACKGROUND North Suburban Development Company requests approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide 11.38 acres of property located on the west side of Strawberry Lane, approximately 420 feet south of Smithtown Road, (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The property is zoned R -1A, Single - Family Residential. As can be seen on Exhibit B, the developer proposes to create 11 new lots, all of which meet or exceed 40,000 square feet in area. • The property is currently undeveloped and surrounded entirely by single- family residential development, zoned R -1A. It is the remnant of a previous four -lot plat known as Westlawn Two. The site is extremely flat and presumeably characterized by a high water table, as is the surrounding area. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Following is how the developer's proposal compares to the requirements of Shorewood's Zoning and Subdivision Codes: A. Zoning Requirements. 1. Lot Area. As mentioned the proposed lots all meet or exceed the minimum lot area requirement of 40,000 square feet. They range in area from 40,000 to 50,000 square feet. The largest lot, located in the southeast corner of the plat, contains approximately 10,000 square feet of ponding area. The lots average 41,327 square feet. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South ShoreD Re: Shorewood Suburban Estates Preliminary Plat 2 July 1990 The existing zoning and proposed lot sizes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for this area. The Plan recommends low density residential at one to two units per acre. The proposed density for the plat calculates out to .96 units per acre, based on a 40,000 square foot acre. 2. Lot Width. All lots, including the ones at the end of the cul -de -sac, meet or exceed the minimum 120 foot requirement, measured at the building line. 3. Lot Depth. All lots far exceed the minimum 150 foot depth requirement. 4. Setbacks. Building are shown on the plat. All lots have ample buildable area, including Lot 11, which appears shallow -relative to the other lots. Technically, this lot fronts on Strawberry Lane • because its narrowest frontage is on the east side. This makes the west end of the lot the rear. Based on zoning definitions, the correct setbacks have been shown in heavy dashed lines on Exhibit B. The building pad location shown on the proposed Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan (Exhibit C) should be modified accordingly. Presumably any house built on this lot will orient to the proposed street. 5. Nonconforming Structure. There is an outbuilding shown on Lot 5 which currently exists as a nonconforming use. Since the building is located almost entirely in the rear yard setback area for that lot, plat approval should require its removal from the site. B. Subdivision Requirements. 1. Proposed Street. The proposed street is approximately 830 feet long, 130 feet longer than what is normally recommended. It is, however, is well within the current Subdivision Ordinance limit of 2000 feet. Given the extent of surrounding development and the size of lots in the plat, the proposed street is considered acceptable. The proposed street complies with the following requirements: a. Cul -de -sac diameter: b. R.O.W. width: c. Paved suface width: d. Distance from nearby intersection (Peach Circle): 60' r.o.w. radius 50' paved surface radius 50' 24' 300' It should be noted that cross - sectional details and grade are not required as part of the preliminary plat. The City Engineer will address these items as part of the final plat review. - 2 - Re: Shorewood Suburban Estates Preliminary Plat 2 July 1990 2. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control. From a planning and zoning perspective, this plat is very simple to review. The engineering aspects of the plat are somewhat more complicated, however, particularly drainage. The developer plans to drain most of the plat to a proposed ponding area located in the southeast corner of the site. From there it flows under Strawberry Lane where it is conducted to the east and ultimately north to a wetland system adjoining Lake Minnetonka. The City Engineer will review and comment on the acceptability of this drainage proposal in a separate report. His report should also address whether larger than normal drainage easements are necessary based on the proposed drainage plan. / t h - �erce��ol 3. Utilities. The developer proposes to extend an eight inch sanitary sewer lateral from the existing main located in Strawberry Lane. Since water main has not been shown on his preliminary utility plan, it is assumed that the lots will be served by private wells. 4. Park Dedication. Given the proximity of the property to Cathcart and Freeman Parks, it is assumed that park dedication will be in the form of cash in lieu of land. Based upon current fees, the developer will have to pay $500 per lot, or $5500 in total. This must be paid prior 'to release of the final plat. 5. General Design. As mentioned in the preceding Lot 11 is technically oriented differently than the other 10 lots. This is considered necessary, however, due to the limited amount of available frontage on Strawberry Lane. The east side lot line of Lot 5 is more oblique than what is normally desired. However, given the irregularity of the north boundary of the plat, a very unusable yard space would be created if an attempt were made to straighten it out. That and the relatively large buildable area for Lot 5 make the design acceptable. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding, the plat meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the Shorewood Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The primary issue to be resolved as of this writing is drainage. It is therefore recommended that preliminary plat approval be granted subject to the following: 1. The City Engineer must approve plans for grading, drainage, erosion control and utilities. Drainage is also subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2. The final plat should include drainage and utility easements 10 feet on each side of side and rear property lines - larger where specified by the City Engineer. - 3 - Re: Shorewood Suburban Estates Preliminary Plat 2 July 1990 3. When submitting the final plat, the applicant must provide a title opinion for the property, up -to -date within 30 days of when the Council will review it. 4. Park dedication fees, $5500, must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 5. The staff should be directed to prepare a standard development agreement upon receipt of the final plat information. 6. The final plat must be submitted within six months of preliminary plat approval. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker 40 Jim Norton Glenn Froberg North Suburban Development Co. Steve Johnston - 4 - r I g 7/0 ; NJ aiw+:il.aa dv31 3�dVn f%9 ® 1 I 18 .c1.K.IS r6 crt I (� ►.t8 A ., f o ,' ' 91is S s'o V e• ,1 4o.a, o , .., t7 n - A v M r..•. . OJ 1 9 11 • 1 41E - 4 f ^ a 1 v 1 ►n I r L►► ^ry 9) 69'16. cak tot i t 29'611 O ct O 1 19'821 � ost h c 0 6 9► a -� al 1 - 99 for 1616 r 11 roe - v . 1 — — • � vi xaa�eMVais � •. C'> ' ►1 K 4kI dy`' 80 0a Ne i' S38 Co 9Z ` Gj�" j ►9c I � ------------ _ N &J set o-a v � ` 1r M'1►1 ss'ul. • •�.• N °� _ TI QJ A aC'IFZ 6 90 192 - 2 t v � - - - - - -- F - - - -- ? ---- = - - - -- . N - ... e m •.• 60791 1 ------- _______ __ ____ ' 60 90'921 10' a , � = � ` fJ - e R :, ,�..... 091 ...... »M....... Z91 .........« .f'. :♦ 1� 1 R 61 ez1 -- _ ' _3.92.K.ON 2 c'I►► F O21 __! -- _L. ' 1' - -009 cW $ , _ 2 z• �„ E1 ,9M 1 � z 69 V.E r' � t t \.. } � '¢ �7 a ? ? - l I �.. 'n . e.,. u •R o of :�' '`�� 4 !C • . 26'992 - i 51 191 9s1 IL - C \ v Is= _ �- m d 1 I Ulu N •'' t � or ,� O e d a $ � / :�\ 1 „ b ... � it Exhibit A x r SITE LOCATION --- • - -+ Shorewood Suburban Estates v v Preliminary Plat I I i '` -\ i it ' `\ ' r l i t I I • i I ` - - --- \` \ _ I � i CATCHCAR --! _ `" — C RJVE 1 — I - --- - - - - -- r I 1 l 1 i , / ♦ / d•1 ' / I `--- - - ---- Y / i i / �'1 / , �. fig► i � � - - 86.06 N 00 09'00"W`,� .i 1 1 I 1 '3 It v \\ ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ R) � � I V •. - 1 1 W lD �f 1 I O 0 1 1 I I ♦ `v 1 ♦ 1 m -r I -1 I 1 ♦ O F N Y Q) i o w I7LL4rNp , . ' O ilo C71. ; N 00 09'0( .« \ , ► �/ y I i 53.61 I F 0 co LIT ...I N ♦ O I t ' \ O ' -- - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 (- . 2- • . ----- - - - - -' 1 N 1 i' �i 1 I •r I (. 1 - 1 I 1 � �• 1 v 1 i ♦ I � ( 1 /• i t O 1 N � 1 ` �i A \\ 1 1 � I � I 1 I O 1 O 1 ; 1 W ♦` 1 A 1 � 1 1 1 .4 1 ' 0 LO / I � - - - - -- 2 - - - - / ' t = - - __ - - - 247 - - -_J I 1 r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 1 / _ - - -- / / / / - - -- -- -_ Z 1 ' In I r / r r ' l CO I 1 II II to i t I 1 I I 11 / p I ux I I I I II °o N i t q W/ `� rn w I I t 1 1 �1 r 1 - rr, Ln i �urJ I e IZ Qi 45 �k 44.89 \ w !* 1 1 I N 00 17'20, W I 1 I CD `�♦ �., --- -- - -- --- a r Iw ' I O t Q j jl II 1 PONDING \'•� !0.000 sQ.ft. i i _:^ ' 0-- .: 4 1 ` R -- - - - -- TRAWRIEBi6iY -- 2141D ADQ17�1 R1011 � �Fu �PecDs r DA ma �m � D o � — L A N F --- I - Exhibit B D v m PRELIMINARYIPLAT I i i � • l Y n c 4rp�� - ___ -•-_�. JNVI S24 \ \ I 1 1 1 - 1 I , I , I , 1 1 i I I 1 I I I I 1 j I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 _ 1 i I i a S i T (� I W I W i :• 1 _ I ~¢ Mb �g5 i�w0 w W � M LU cc k W MO E � 1.. C LL 1 i8eili6'OY uea� a ll3i - A `-, c -_ Atllf3E/WYH1$-- �. 1 1 ti 2 1 j i a0 1 1 1 / 1 I i 1 r r 1 r � 1 i r 1 t�" to , r , b EI, , 'r I / f ---- - - - - - -I ' 1 I I I I I I I I RP 1 :3 1 8 �aN Y W N I o ' I �_________ _____J ---------- - - - - -� 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 q , - - - - -- - - - - -i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` :l : 1 *C O' 11 W I N I la I I 1 I • � o 4 77- 7 2 _ o / a, 7 - W Q 4 \ ' f I r \ \� O � I � 1: 1 P I 1 I i 1 I 1 I I I I 1 III1 ' II \� 1 A 6 I W -- cr fA Exhibit C PROPOSED GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -I r ------` -- - -- a. , 1 P C.�i .. Y i /, r \ , r - \- I ZI ga 1 E '��14; i r r - y og U. 1 �� „�4 •1 1 I , I 1 1 A I r f ¢� i -- I I y 1 \ I 1 1 I 1 orr OAMSNt Schelen lblayeron& Associates, Inc. September 5, 1990 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Brad Nielsen City Planner Re: Shorewood Suburban Estates OSM Comm. No. 4590.11 Dear Brad: When this plat originally came before the Council (July 23, 1990), one of the main reasons the Council did not act on the preliminary plat was due to some questions co6cerning drainage. C7 1. Grading and Drainage - Having reviewed the revised grading and drainage plan submitted by Merila & Associates, they have redirected the majority of the site drainage to the two ponds on the east end of the plat. This is in conformance with what we discussed at our meeting with them July 25, 1990. The only additional area of concern regarding drainage is the City's legal right to direct stormwater discharge across property east of Strawberry Lane east of this project. The City Attorney should be asked to review this item and come back with a recommendation. 2. Storm Sewer - The storm sewer they've shown on their final plans will handle the drainage from their property and enhance the capability of handling drainage for adjacent properties. However, it should be noted that without any major changes in the proposed piping system under Strawberry Lane and across the property to the east Strawberry Lane may periodically be inundated. Correction of this potential problem is beyond the scope of this project. 3. Street - The street section proposed is very slight, 0.5 %. As a result, they will have to use concrete curb and gutter to insure a quality control project that will enable the street to be put in so that it will drain properly. They are in agreement with this item. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612- 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Surveyors Planners 4. Water - Water will be supplied by individual wells. ' . . \ I- Mr. Brad Nielsen September 5, 1990 Page 2 5. Sanitary Sewer - The proposed sanitary sewer design as shown on their drawings meets the minimum engineering design standards. Connection to the M.W.C.C. line must be approved by M.W.C.C. and inspected by them during construction. Having reviewed all the information submitted, we recommend approval of this plat from an engineering standpoint. Respectfully, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. James P. Norton, P.E. City Engineer JPN /cmw 09 /90- cos.bn cc: Mr. Larry Whittaker, City Administrator Mr. Don Zdrazil, Director of Public Works Mr. Glenn Froberg, City Attorney Mr. Steve Johnston, Merila & Associates • I MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover Bob Gagne ~ -. Rob Daugherty r Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD _ 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • , SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 a (612) 474 -3236 MEMORANDUM - TO: Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council FROM: Brad Nielsen _ DATE: 25 October 1991 RE: Manor Park Warming House - C.U.P. FILE NO.: 405 (89.32) _ For the past two years the City has granted conditional use permits to allow a temporary warming house at Manor Park (see staff reports dated 16 November 1990, copied in green, and 31 August 1989, copied in yellow). The referendum mentioned in the 1990 report was postponed and has now been reduced in scale. The Park Commission now proposes to hold a referendum in April of 1992. As in previous reports it is recommended that the c.u.p. be granted for more than just one year. Even if the referendum is successful it is unlikely that a permanent warming house . could be built for use in 1992. It is therefore recommended that the c.u.p. be granted for two more seasons, after which either a permanent building should be built or the Zoning Ordinance should be amended to provide for temporary park shelters. Meanwhile, the Park Commission's Capital Improvements Plan should be modified to make the Manor Park warming house a priority for construction in 1993. BJN:ph cc: Jim Hurm Dave Sellergren Sue Niccum 1 AW- MEMORA NDUM TO: FWming -Co FROM: Bid ITICIM DATE: 16 N RE. Mom Park Warming House FILE NO: 405 (89.32) C The 1989 staff report raises a am recommendation at that time was ayes which a decision should be recommendation remains unchaq new c.u.p. should be fear one A Rarer 1 • • The Shorewood Park Commission would like to locate a temporary waxing ' St Manor Park for three months out of the year (winter season). They propose to rest an $I x 3g' mobile building. They intend to monitor use of the temp smelter to datemino if a permanent building is warranted for this park. pla wis xen said that precedent setting is a concern. that this proposal should be viewed the s=W as private development. Be said he does not have detailed analysis at this time arut to has the facility complies with building code for egress and safety requ�irements. Public portion of the public hearing opened at 8 :40 P.M. the area resident said that a woman who lives across from the Park told bar that I she believes the park would get used a lot more if a shelter were installed, Bob Boyer, Suburban Drive, said he agrees. The Park needs shelter and ligbtierg, and asked if it would be staffed during the skating season. Gordon Lindstrom, Park Commissioner, said lighting could be placed on me aid* of the building to light the skating pond, and the shelter would be staffed. Bob Gagne, Council Liaison to Park Commission. noted that the Park CG=i srtexn has reviewed this proposal extensively. A lot of work and thought has been put project. Gordy Christianson. Park Commissioner, said many young children in the area need this shelter. The kids now have to sit in snow banks to change their skates in the winter. Benson read aloud a letter submitted by Thomas and Charlotte Smith. 20540 Manor load. ado oppose any structure being placed in Manor Park. Public portion of the public hearing closed at 8:51 P.M. Mason said she is disappointed that the Park Commission didn't pursese construction of a permanent structure two gears ,ego. Mr. Lindstrom said the City couldn t afferd it at that time. Using a temporary shelter will establish the Meat of the ; for a permanent. more expensive shelter in this Park. Mason said if there is MY I ,need at all, a more attractive structure should be designed. Mason moved to recommend to Council that the C.U.P. request be denied. Notion died for / lack of a second. 3 Carriad unanuousiy. 6 OO P.M. PUBLIC REARING .. LO_T &a VARIANCE James Miller - 5664 Ri llendale Road 16 Mr. Miller is requesting a lot area variance to build a Single—family dwallimg tft thiS property located in the k -1A zoning district. The lox contains 25.500 squwree feet-:0f area which is substandard for the R-1A. district. The variance is required boosos the lot doers not contain at least 70 percent of the minimum required. The vartafte required, amounts to 2500 square feet. Public portion of the public bearing opened at 9:13 P.M. Will Johnson, owner of adjacent lot, said be has concern about fill that was Placed an this lot two years ago which apparently was contaminated from the gas station site it carne from. He is also concerned about which direction the drainage will flow off of the lot. Will Kahl, owner of adjacent lot, said he supports the variance, although be *Is* bars concerns about contaminated soil. 1 OPlanner Nielsen said that due to any fill herring been placed on the lot, the soil Vlll W subject to testing and, if contandinted, will be subject to removal. The lot being 1000 than the street, the drainage will be subject to the City Engineer's s► . Public portion of the public hearing closed at 9 :24 P.M. Pitney asked if the driveway access is a concern due to the esaamant Waass an this lot. Nielsen said it may be a concern, the driveway plan will be required for the ;,building permit application. Mason moved, seconded by Pitney to recommend to Council approval of the lot area variance. Motion carried unanimously. This iteia will be on the Council agenda of 11 September 1369. .. MIN S -- MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 PAS PARK COMMISSION REPORT - Continue Authorize the Advertisement for Bids - Freeman Park Bal fie d Fencin Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel, to accept the plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for bids for the ballfield fencing, bid opening will be held at 11 A.M. on September 25, 1989. Motion carried - 4 ayes. Manor Park Warming House CUP Resolution N .71_19 Stover reported on the public hearing held by the Planning Conva on the CUP for a temporary building to be used as a` warming house in Park. The Planning Commi -scion recommend approval of the CUP for one year only. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to adopt Resolution No.76 -89, approving the CUP for a temporary warming house for one -year subject to the con- dition set forth in the Planning Commission minutes. Motion carried- 4 ayes. COUNCIL REPORT Mayor's Report Intergovernmental Meeting of the LMCD Haugen reported on the discussion at the LMCD Intergovernmental meeting regarding the appointment of the representatives by the Cities to the LMCD. Some of the Mayors' would like the representatives to be appoint- ed for the same term as that of the Mayor. The mayors would also like to be able to recall a representative if they don't like the manner in which the City is being represented. Rascop felt the three -year term prevented a possible total turn over of all the representatives at one time. Rascop thought a recall would be possible for poor performance. However, Rascop said, Cities should not be able to recall a representa- tive simply for disagreeing with their directives. Representatives should act in the best interests of the Lake, as they see it. Regional breakfast meeting for City officials with the Met Council will be held at 7:30 A.M., Friday, September 22nd; Whittaker will attend.' Transportation conference will be held on October 19 and 20, and Regional Transportation conference will be held on the 18th of October. The public hearing on Waterford 3rd Phase is scheduled for 7 :30 P.M., September 12, at the Minnewashta School. Gagne asked what progress was being made on the recycling containers. , Kennelly stated that she had to meet with the printer to obtain a camera ready copy for the logo, 'name and recycling sign to submit with the. order. �g- MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: 0 • ANALYSISIRECOMMENDATION The City Council has directed my departments to evaluate this request from zoning and building code perspectives. MAYOR Jan Hawn COUNCIL, Kristi stomr Robert Go" Barb BrBncai Vern Watte CITY OF SHOREWOOD 0 5755 COUM I M T CLUB ROAD • SMOREWOOD, MiNTUESOTA 00.341 • ts121 4741-3236 PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 31 AUGUST 1989 RE: MANOR PARK WARMING HOUSE - C.U.P. FILE NO.: 405 (89.32) BACKGROUND The Shorewood Park Commission proposes to locate a temporary warming house at Manor Park (see Site Location map -- Exhibit A. attached). They propose to rent an 8' x 32' mobile building (see Exhibit B) for three months. Depending on its use, it is our understanding that they may wish to use the building for two years following, three months at a time. This proposal requires a conditional use permit, despite the temporary nature of the building.` You may recall that the City considered a conditional use permit for a permanent building in May of 1987 (see staff report, dated 30 April 1987 Attachment I, copied in yellow). After considerable discussion the Park Commission decided their capital improvements budget could not afford a permanent building designed and built to code. They intend to monitor use of the temporary shelter to determine if a permanent building is warranted for this park. The Park Commission proposes to locate the structure in the same spot as was proposed for the permanent building (see Exhibit C of Attachment I). Hopefully, members of the Park Commission will attend the public hearing on 5 September to answer questions. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Re: Manor Park Warming House Conditional Use Permit 31 August 1989 A. Zoning Requirements. Park buildings are regulated by Section 1201.10 Subd. 4.a. of the City Code. Following is bow the proposed shelter complies with that section. 1. Given the temporary nature of the shelter and the need to wheel it in and out of the park, screening and landscaping is not recommended at this time. At such time as a permanent shelter is built, a landscape plan should be prepared. 2. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned in the 1987 staff report, a shelter building is considered to be a typical element of a park and essential where winter activities are provided. Page 44 of Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan (see Exhibit C) contains policies relative to the construction of governmental buildings and facilities. It may be argued that the mobile shelter may be contrary to policy number 4. • 3. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. In recent years Shorewood has taken particular care to make its public buildings blend into the neighborhoods in which they are located. The best examples of this are the Boulder Bridge and southeast area pump houses. Worse examples are the Public Works garage and Badger pump house which predate Shorewood's Comprehensive Plan. While the proposed structure is not considered to be compatible with housing quality in the Manor Park area. the City may be willing to overlook this requirement if the structure is limited to only three months per year for three years. 4. Affect on Property Values. Several communities have been identified as having used portable shelter buildings. Presumably because they are temporary, the buildings do not detract from property values. It is possible that people view the portable shelters as being better than no shelter at all. 5. Construction Requirements. In addition to requirements of the State Building Code, Shorewood has adopted into the Zoning Ordinance criteria for the construction of buildings. With respect to residential areas, the requirements were adopted to discourage mobile homes and pole barns. As a technicality, governmental buildings are not specifically addressed. A general requirement for all buildings in residential districts is that sheet or corrugated steel or aluminum siding is prohibited for buildings over 120 square feet in floor area. The mobile shelter comes with corrugated aluminum siding. The brochures we have seen suggest that other types of siding may be available. -2- Re: Manor Park Warming House Conditional Use Permit 31 August 1989 • 0 B. Buildin& Code Requirements The Park Commission has expressed a degree of frustration in the past with building code requirements, particularly with respect to having plans prepared by a registered architect. Several times we have been asked why other cities get by with portable buildings, trailers, etc. for park shelters. The vendor has referred us to a number of cities for whom they have provided temporary park shelters. As of this writing it appears that in most cases the building departments have been side - stepped,. Parks departments have wheeled the units in without building department input and building officials have apparently looked the other way. There is a provision in the Building Code which gives the Building Official discretion to issue permits for temporary "miscellaneous" structures. Depending on an evaluation currently being made by the Building Inspector, this approach may be used here. If certain basic life safety requirements can be met, we may be able to issue the permit from this office. If we are not comfortable with the code compliance of the unit, the City Council may have to issue the permit. There is apparently neighborhood demand for some type of shelter facility. The concerns raised herein may be mitigated by the public interest being served. While temporary use of the portable building may be acceptable, it is not recommended as a long term solution for the park. Assuming a reasonable amount of use of the facility during the trial period, it is recommended that the Park Commission reconsider a permanent, low-maintenance building. BJN :ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Sue Niccum Park Commission - 3 - r BLOCK i r ST ALS ANS < SHORES- 9 S� i1 A L BA S o GREEN r T� ; • *} /AL DCK n0. ec ci' �OI2685.... . • r ST. ALBANS SHORES 1. i � + 2 mi • sc r4 K to� Z `f � ''�� X11 � � r• C ns Ls 69 G ` 1 ter ;.. Exhibit A SITE LOCATION ` 4 Manor Park Temporary Shelter Building 1 1Z 7 'e 0 s i I! N M W {Jf h L, C C S JS CL oo Exhibit B PROPOSED MOBILE BUILDING 3 N h m x co co m g � V V \Iti /V V V ©u M (A X 00 0 17. Park and open space facilities shall be planned and developed in cooperation and coordinated with similar services of surrounding communities, the school district, and the metropolitan area as a whole. 18. Studies on a periodic basis shall be undertaken to analyze the effective- ness and comprehensiveness of the community recreation program. These studies should serve as the basis for recreation open space planning and programming . 19. Continual citizen participation in the planning, development and operation of recreational open space shall be maintained. Lakeshore Use 1. Lake Minnetonka shall be considered a community recreational facility and appropriate actions shall be taken to permit utilization of the lake by all City residents. • 2. Regulations shall be formulated g o Mated to ensure accessibility to Lake Minnetonka while at the same time minimizing any potential impact on surrounding uses. 3. In order to protect and preserve the amenity provided by Lake Minnetonka, the City shall encourage uniform regulation and enforcement of lake use. Governmental Buildings and Facilitie 1 . Cooperation and coordination shall be promoted and actively pursued between governmental units in the provision of public facilities and services. 2. The full utilization of investments in public facilities and services shall be achieved prior to making new public investments. 3. Public facilities and services shall be located to the greatest extent possible so as to offer ease of access and minimal response time. 4. All public facilities shall be developed, improved and maintained according to the highest adopted standards of design and performance to serve as examples for private development. 5. All public buildings shall be designed and maintained to be resistant to person and property crime opportunity while maximizing public and city usability. H Exhibit C EXCERPT - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 44 t ADDITIONAL COST INF ORMATION PROPOSED WARMING HOUSE TRAILER Set -up /Take -down cbaraes Delivery ...................$ 80. Pick up.. ............... 80. Put up on blocks & level.. 60. Take down off blocks...... 60. Monthlz_Rent Rent..................... Insurance The City must provide a certificate of insurance Liaibility $ 500,000.. per person per occurrence Property Damage ....... $ 150. The City would cover this under current policy $150/200 The current City insurance will not cover the trailer - with a value in the neighborhood of $8,100.- the cost to the City would be between $150 -200 a season. This can be done by the Public Works Department, if you chose to do it this way - -drop the $280. charge. per month (3 month maximum) Comprehensive Floor Covering The City would have to provide some type of floor covering to protect the floor (i.e. carpeting, rubber matting, plywood).. Satellite Rent -3 months........... $ 150. Access Ramp Public Works would have to build some type of platform & ramp to the doors....... Damage Deposit Deposit ................ $ 150/250 Electricity Telephone Benches Public works would have to build some type of benches f-or the skaters to sit on. possible Exhibit D ESTIMATED COST BREAKDOWN MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jon Heugen Kristi Stoves Robert Gagne �7 OF AOMINISTAATOR Branca# Janie# !_ Vogt SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 4743236 19MRANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 30 APRIL 1987 RE: MANOR PARK WARMING HOUSE - C.U.P. FILE NO.: 405 (87.13) BACKGROUND The Shorewood Park Commission has prepared plans for a warming house /pavil.lion to be. located in Manor Park (see Site Location map Exhibit A, attached). Pursuant to Section 200.01 Subd. 4a. of the Shorewood Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing has been scheduled for the 5 May Planning Commission meeting to consider a conditional use permit for the facility. The proposed building measures 24' x 48' with half of it enclosed as a warming shelter and the other half open as a picnic pavillion. The building is surrounded by a concrete slab which covers a 34' x 58' area. Elevations of the proposed building are shown on Exhibit B. attached. As shown on Exhibit C the building is to be located 50 feet from the right- of-way of Manor Road and 35 feet from the east edge of the pond in the southwest corner of the park. ANALYSIS /RECOMMEMATION The proposed building is very residential in character and should be an amenity to the Manor Park neighborhood. Following is how the shelter complies with the criteria contained in Section 200.01 Subd. 4a. 1. Screening and Landscaping. Given the residential character of the proposed shelter, the need for screening is questionable. It is our understanding that the Park Commission is currently preparing an overall landscape plan for Manor Park. 7 4.f +ate hrna n ' I A Residential Communiry on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Re: Manor Park Warming House 30 April 1987 2. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. A shelter building in considered to be a typical element of a park. Construction of the shelter should enhance both winter and summer activities in the park. 3. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The residential character of the proposed building blends well into the single- family neighborhood in which it is located. 4. Affect on Property Values. The amenity provided by the shelter building should enhance property values in the surrounding area rather than detract from them. The proposed building is considered to be consistent with both the Shorewood Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. It is therefore recommended that the C.U.P. be favorably considered. BJN:ph • cc: Dan Vogt Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Park Commission • - 2 - r. i_ aj 0 c1 .1 .o s . Rri •, w ,�r, i 0 4 T .I w t { { _ � b t Lj- 4 7 { i '�� ,-- A� wit C BUILDING LOCATION ` t i �� Vi i.•• a, � . � �,, 1 Si✓ `' w ty' ; q'i•,:�� ?s • •4'�'�j v, t Y f v .w ' !. r•. L _�� � ,' �, it v i ''y. Y� ` ,'a ,t's. :1 ' +. • ' Ig r ... + - A mm r" Alt t ?' FM� c ►! RaH ^ttJ a .c, ON IF ' Cr , WN E • • -�• •.{.++per .. •. � ,,�' ..;t: . ,� i±, r �� • � t9t -ion a . � �. r W it D Exbi FWOR PLAN AN t y. • s t I j 4 • f J.�. �• • i _3 Am ' ' `XF l •. 1 wt:Y a'. ,:. :7 �..,` cwtjryb! it D Exbi FWOR PLAN AN RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, on October 2, 1991, a position on the Shorewood Planning Commission was vacated by the resignation of Richard Spellman whose three year term is due to expire on December 31, 1992; and WHEREAS, at its November 12, 1991 meeting, the Shorewood City Council did interview applicants for the purpose of naming an appointee to fill said vacated position; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at its November 12, 1991 meeting, decided on an appointee to fill said vacancy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that Jack Hansen, a resident of Shorewood, Minnesota, is hereby named and appointed to fulfill an unexpired term on the Shorewood Planning Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appointment shall commence with the passage of this Resolution and expire on December 31, 1992. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of November, 1991. BARBARA J. BRANCEL, Mayor ATTEST: JAMES C. HURM, Administrator /Clerk 30 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, on September 9, 1991, a position on the Shorewood Planning Commission was vacated by the resignation of David Pitney whose three year term is due to expire on December 31, 1992; and WHEREAS, at its November 12, 1991 meeting, the Shorewood City Council did interview applicants for the purpose of naming an appointee to fill said vacated position; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at its November 12, 1991 meeting, decided on an appointee to fill said vacancy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that Douglas Malam, a resident of Shorewood, Minnesota, is hereby named and appointed to fulfill an unexpired term on the Shorewood Planning Commission. , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appointment shall commence with the passage of this Resolution and expire on December 31, 1992. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of November, 1991. • BARBARA J. BRANCEL, Mayor ATTEST: JAMES C. HURM, Administrator /Clerk 3E 1 't POSITION DESCRIPTION JOINT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY The City Councils of Shorewood, Excelsior, and Tonka Bay have recognized the merits of selecting one attorney to render joint prosecuting services. It is the intent of this position description to outline the duties of a prosecuting attorney appointed separately by the three City Councils. 1.1) Duties and Supervision. During the term of this Agreement, the Prosecutor agrees to perform the following duties: 1. Prosecution of all petty misdemeanor, misdemeanor and some gross misdemeanor offenses committed within the corporate limits of the Cities. 2. Preparation of criminal complaints. 3. Evaluate all cases where a plea of not guilty is entered. A. Prosecute if warranted B. Prepare pre -trial Rasmussen notice if required C. Seek a complete additional investigation if required D. Plea bargain where advisable ' 4. Represent Cities in all pre -trial motions. 5. Perform all needed legal research and prepare briefs when required or advisable. 6. Appear at arraignments. 7. Try all court or jury cases. • 8. Appear at all pre - trials and trial meetings. 9. Examine and evaluate whether a case should be appealed. 10. Prepare appellate briefs and other necessary documents for all appeals and argue the case at oral arguments.. 11. Make an accurate accounting of all hours spent by activity, at least monthly, to each City. 12. Provide advice, consultation and training where required to the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department, and to all other departments of the Cities in the interpretation and enforcement of statutes or ordinances and investigations of suspected violations, in connection with the prosecution of criminal cases. 13. Performs other work as required for the proper discharge of prosecutorial duties for the Cities. RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION APPOINTING KENNETH N. POTTS AS A JOINT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FROM JANUARY 1, 1992 TO DECEMBER 31, 1993 WHEREAS, the Cities of Shorewood, Excelsior and Tonka Bay have recognized the merits of selecting one attorney to render joint prosecution services; and WHEREAS, said Cities appointed representatives to a Joint Prosecuting Attorney Selection Committee; and WHEREAS, said Selection Committee has received applications, conducted interviews, and made a recommendation jointly to the three City Councils; and i WHEREAS, said recommendation is for the appointment of Kenneth N. Potts to render joint prosecution services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Shorewood City Council appoints Kenneth N. Potts as Prosecuting Attorney effective 'January 1, 1992 for a period ending December 31, 1993; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said appointment is in accordance with the Position Description and Letter of Agreement hereby approved by the City Council and attached hereto and made a part of; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City shall pay to the Prosecutor as compensation for his services $17,500 per year. Said fee paid by the City encompasses the entire amount owed, as prosecutor agrees to cover all expenses. The City shall pay . prosecutor one twelveth of said annual amount each month upon receipt of invoice and report of activity. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of November 1991. Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm City Administrator 3(� LETTER OF AGREEMENT • To the Shorewood City Council, As a duly licensed attorney to practice law in the State of Minnesota, I agree to perform all the duties outlined in the attached Joint Prosecuting Attorney Position Description for the City of Tonka Bay upon appointment by the City Council. Further I agree to the following: Term of Employment The City employs Prosecutor as an attorney for a term beginning January 1, 1992 and ending on December 31, 1993 unless terminated under the termination paragraph. Expansion of Joint Services. If the Prosecutor should begin prosecution services for other Cities, the fee agreement shall be reopened to examine whether the added efficiency would result in reduction of fees paid by the Cities of Shorewood, Excelsior and Tonka Bay. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate as follows: a) By mutual agreement of the parties. b) Upon the death of the prosecutor. U C) If the City is dissatisfied with the performance of the prosecutor it may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice after which the City shall have no further liability to the prosecutor. d) In addition, the City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately upon the occurrence of any one of the following events: 1) The revocation or suspension of longer than 30 days of Prosecutor's license to practice law in the State of Minnesota. 2) The conviction of Prosecutor of any crime punishable as a felony involving moral turpitude or immoral conduct. 3N Page Two - Letter of Agreement Entire Agreement; Modifications; waiver. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained in it and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties. No supplement, modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. Sincerely, Kenneth N. Potts, Esq. Date • • November 21, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: State Aid Operation Variance Old Market Road. OSM Comm. No. 4705.01 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612- 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Dear Mayor and City Council: Attached please find a resolution for a variance to the State Aid Operations Rule Chapter 8820.2800. This Resolution will be necessary to ensure there are no difficulties in receiving the MSA funds budgeted for the project. It has been common practice in past years to be able to award (enter into a construction contract) a project once the project has been approved by the District State Aid Engineer. We received this approval on August 7, 1991 and subsequently went ahead with the contract, which was executed on August 19, 1991. However, on August 15, 1991 the (then) Commissioner of Transportation sent out a memo to the State Aid Office effectively stating that award must wait until the official State Aid Engineer sign -off, which we received on September 3, 1991. Since we were caught right in the middle of this policy change, and were not notified of the Commissioner's decision, the State Aid office has suggested that we apply for this variance to avoid any i technical problems in receiving our funds. This resolution must be received by the State Aid Office by December 1, 1991. The address to send it to is: Ms. Julie Skallman Assistant State Aid Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building St. Paul, MN 55155 3T Equal Opportunity Employer As always, please do not hesitate to call with any questions you may have. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer c: Jim Norton • 0 RESOLUTION NO. -91 RESOLUTION REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STATE AID OPERATIONS RULE, CHAPTER 8820.2800, Subp. 2. WHEREAS, plans and specifications were prepared for the extension of OLD MARKET ROAD from Station 9 +70 to S.T.H. No. 7 in Shorewood, Minnesota, designated as M.S.A. Project 216 - 111 -01; WHEREAS, these plans and specifications were approved by the District State Aid Engineer on August 7, 1991 and by the State Aid Engineer on September 3, 1991; WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.2800, Subp. 3 reads in part "...Only those projects for which final plans are approved by • the state -aid engineer before awarding a contract ... are eligible for state -aid construction funds. "; WHEREAS, the City entered into a construction contract on August 19, 1991, unintentionally awarding the contract prior to the State Aid Engineer's final approval; WHEREAS, the City is relying on state -aid construction funds to finance approximately $150,000.00 of the project; WHEREAS, the City will be severely economically impacted without the anticipated M.S.A. funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The City of Shorewood formally requests a variance pursuant to Chapter 8820.3300 from said Chapter • 8820.2800, Subp. 2 as noted, and requests that project M.S.A. 216 - 111 -01 be eligible for state aid funding. ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk Barbara,Brancel, Mayor TITLE SHEET •. ¢ a 's F ! c� _ _ s z 1I j i _ 4 X^arApP ^ &��XyP~ 4 CA n 0 .,� z� o Cn 0 CO 0 C. d l�3 7y � O 77 n C � ►'•3 z Cm �q� > . o � � a N • F r: b Y Y - - _' _ ^ §fig 0 rn cµ Schelen I 09 Meyeron ID As socfet.s.Inc. 4 N y - c � > V O _ a m m �i ° ► 2 a n A ; = m y D p Z Z m N,U O a i i c g Orr ' Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612- 331 -8660 November 18, 1991 FAX 331 -3806 � En veers Architects Planners Surveyors City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Old Market Road Intersection City Project 91 -4, OSM Comm. No. 4705.01 Pay Voucher No. 2 Dear Mayor and City Council: Enclosed please find Construction Payment Voucher No. 2 on the • referenced project in the amount of $404,574.34 Please make payment in the amount of $404,574.34 to Hardrives, Inc. 9724 10th Ave. No., Plymouth, MN 55441 at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer 0 Enclosure /j ad 1009pay1.let c: Hardrive, Inc. 3 Equal Opportunity Employer VOUCHER NO.: DATE: PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: OSM COMM. NO.: FOR: 2 November 1, 1991 Old Market Road Intersection 91 -4 4705.01 City of Shorewood, MN A. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $1,044,615.70 B. TOTAL ADDITIONS: $0.00 C. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS: $0.00 D. TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED: E. TOTAL VALUE OF WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE: F. LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE: 5 % G. LESS TOTAL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: H. TOTAL PAYMENTS INCLUDING THIS VOUCHER: $623,396.20 I. ENCUMBERED FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD: $421,219.50 J. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER: TO: HARDRIVES, INC. 9724 10TH AVE. NO. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 $1,044,615.70 $656,206.53 $32,810.33 $218,821.86 $404,574.34 0 ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the materials are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total work is 62 % completed / as of November 1, 1991. We hereby reco end ayment of t voucher. Signed: ��'/ / / - /C4 pv y / TIC Signed: . ■ Construction Observer C' Engineer r This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate value for the period covered by this voucher. CONTRACTOR: Hardrives, Inc. SIGNED BY: DATE: TITLE: ((( ' CITY OF SHOREWOOD DATE. APPROVED: TITLE: ■ $1,044,615.70 $656,206.53 VOUCHER MO.: 2 TO: HARDRIVES, INC. DATE: November 1, 1991 9724 10TH AVE. NO. PROTECT: Old Market Road Intersection PLYMOUTH, MN $5441 PROJECT NO.: 91 -4 OSM COMM. NO.: 4705.01 FOR: City of Shorewood, MN CONTRACT COMPLETE TO DATE ITEM SPEC. TOTAL UNIT TOTAL TOTAL NO. REFERENCE .ITEM UNIT QUANTITY COST AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 1 0563.601 Traffic Control (Stage I&II) L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 - 0.5 $10,000.00 2 0564.602 FmI Signs L.S. 1 $5,720.00 $5,720.00 3 0564.602 Pavement Messages L.S. 1 $2,650.00 $2,650.00 4 0564.603 Line Pavement Markings L.S. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 5 2101.511 Clear c Grub L.S. 1 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 1 $10,500.00 6 2104.501 Remove Curb 4 Gutter (all types) L.F. 85 $5.00 $425.00 140 $700.00 7 2104.501 Remove Pipe (all sizes and types) L.F. 1460 $3.60 $5,256.00 1636 $5,889.60 8 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Median S.Y. 1410 $4.20 $5,922.00 9 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 16142 $1.40 $22,598.$0 10973 $15,362.20 10 2104.513 Sawing Bituminous Pavement L.F. _2414 $2.00 $4,828.00 2441 $4,882.00 11 2105.501 Common Excavation C.Y. 41532 $1.85 $76,834.20 40000 $74,000.00 12 2211.501 Class 5 (100% Crushed) Ton 9899 $7.10 $70,282.90 8018 $56,927.80 13 2105.522 Select Granular Borrow (IV) C.Y. 5164 $5.50 $28,402.00 947 $5,208.50 14 2331.508 Typo 61 Wearing Course Mixture (TH7) Ton 1835 $28.65 $52,572.75 15 2331.512 Type 41 Leveling Course Mixture (TH7) Too 175 $23.30 $4,077.50 16 2331.508 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture Ton 1023 $20.40 $20,869.20 17 2331.510 Type 41 Binder Course (TH7) Ton 886 $19.80 $17,542.80 - 18 2331.510 Type 31 Binder Course Ton 1487 $19.35. $28,773.45 19 2331.514 Type 31 Base Course Mixture Ton 5400 $18.90 $102,060.00 970 $18,339.43 20 21 2357.502 2411.503 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Concrete Retaining Wall (5397.723) Gal. S.Y. 3485 450 $1.00 $360.00 $3,485.00 $162,000.00 100 525 $100.00 $189,000.00 22 2501.567 12" R.C. Apron w /trash guard Each 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 4 $1,200.00 23 2501.567 15' R.C. Apron w /trash guard Each 3 $325.00 $975.00 3 $975.00 24 2501.567 24' R.C. Apron w /trash guard Each 2 $465.00 $930.00 1 $465.00 25 2112.501 Subgrade Preparation RdSt 57 $100.00 - $5,700.00 50 $5,000.00 26 2104.509 Remove C.B. Each 16 $265.00 $4,240.00 15 ,$3,975.00 27 2501.501 Random Rip Rap Class III C.Y. 17 $42.00 $714.00 10.7 $449.40 28 2503.541 24' R.C.P. Class III L.F. 230 $21.00 $4,830.00 211 $4,431.00 29 2503.541 18" R.C.P. Class III L.F. 361 $19.00 $6,859.00 345 $6,555.00 30 2503.541 15" R.C.Y. Class IV L.F. 335 $17.60 $5,896.00 398 $7,004.80 31 2503.541 12" R.C.P. Class IV L.F. 731 $14.30 $10,453.30 1017 $14,543.10 32 STD SPEC STD 4' Dia. Manhole (0 -8' Deep) Each 4 $960.00 .$3,840.00 4 $3,840.00 33 STD SPEC Catch Basin Manholes (0 -8' Deep) Each 14 $880.00 $12,320.00 13.5 $11,880.00 34 STD SPEC Excess Manhole over 8 Deep L.F. 5 $105.00 $525.00 5.6 $588.00 35 STD SPEC STD Catch Basin Each 10 $715.00 $7,150.00 8 $5,720.00 36 STD SPEC Adjust Existing Manhole Each 4 $150.00 $600.00 2 $300.00 37 STD SPEC Adjust Existing Catch Basin Each 2 $150.00 $300.00 38 STD SPEC Adjust Existing Gate Valve Each 2 $150.00 $300.00 39 2521.501 3" Concrete Walk S.F. 145 $2.00 $290.00 40 2531.501 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter L.F. 5889 $5.00 $29,445.00 5000 $25,000.00 41 2531.501 8624 Concrete Curb 6 Gutter L.F. 2170 $6.40 $13,888.00 1000 $6,400.00 42 2531.501 D424 Concrete Curb 6 Gutter L.F. 575 $6.60 $3,795.00 1600 $10,560.00 43 2535.501 Bituminous Curb L.F. 270 $3.00 $810.00 44 2531.503 Concrete Median S.Y. 1385 $20.00 $27,700.00 . 95 46 2554.501 2565.511 Traffic Barrier Design 8322 Full T. Actuated T. Control System L.F. L.S. 300 1 $23.00 $70,000.00 $6,900.00 $70,000.00 0.5 $35,000.00 47 DIV II Seeding /Mulch, Fart. and 4' Topsoil Acre 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 48 2571.541 Transplant (Pine) Tree 15 $150.00 $2,250.00 9 $1,350.00 49 2575.505 Sod /4" Topsoil (Lawn Type) S.Y. 9823 $1.60 $15,716.80 SO 2611.5 Hydrant Each 30 $1,040.00 $10,400.00 10 $10,400.00 51 2611.5 6" Gate Valve and Box Each it $375.00 $4,125.00 11 $4,125.00 52 2611.5 8" Gate Valve and Box Each 7 $500.00 $3,500.00 7 .$3,500.00 53 2611.5 12' Gate Valve 6 Box Each 3 $850.00 $2,550.00 3 $2,550.00 54 2611.5 Fittings Lbs 8040 $1.20 $9,648.00 8790 $10,548.00 55 2611.5 1 -1/2" Corporation Stop Each 4 $121.00 $484.00 4 $484.00 56 2611.5 1 -1/2" Curb Stop 6 Box Each 4 $200.00 $800.00 4 $800.00 57 2611.5 1 -1/2" Copper Type K L.F. 90 $14.00 $1,260.00 99 $1,386.00 58 2611.5 Insulation (4" Thick) S.F. 1500 $2.05 $3,075.00 1504 $3,083.20 59 DIV II Erosion Control L.F. 1000 $2.00 $2,000.00 1137 $2,274.00 60 2611.5 6" D.I.P. Class 52 L.F. 244 $16.50 $4,026.00 190 $3,135.00 61 2611.5 8" D.Z.P. Class 52 L.F. 760 $12.10 $9,196.00 1095 $13,249.50 62 2611.5 12" D.I.P. Class 50 L.F. 2650 $16.50 $43,725.00 2444 $40,326.00 63 DIV II Relocate Hydrant Each 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 64 DIV IZ Jack Casing for 12" Watermain L.F. 140 $110.00 $15,400.00 120 $13,200.00 65 DIV ZZ Mobilization L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 0.5 $10,000.00 66 DIV II Clean -Up L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $1,044,615.70 $656,206.53 November 18, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Orr " Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 - 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Re: Pine Bend Watermain Extension City Project 91 -11, OSM Comm. No. 4775.01 Pay Voucher No. 1 Dear Mayor and City Council: Enclosed please find Construction Payment Voucher No. 1 on the referenced project in the amount of $74,573.31. Please make payment in the amount of $74,573.31 to Widmer, Inc. at your earliest convenience. • Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer Enclosure c: Widmer, Inc. Equal opportunity Employer gK VOUCHER NO.: DATE: PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: OSM COMM. NO.: FOR: 1 November 1, 1991 PINE BEND WATERMAIN EXTENSION 91 -11 4775.10 City of Shorewood, MN A. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: B. TOTAL ADDITIONS: C. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS: D. TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED: E. TOTAL VALUE OF WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE: F. LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE: G. LESS TOTAL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: H. TOTAL PAYMENTS INCLUDING THIS VOUCHER: I. ENCUMBERED FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD: J. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER: TO: WIDMER, INC. P.O. Box 219 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 $117,491.75 $117,491.75 $78,498.22 5 % $3,924.91 $74,573.31 $42,918.44 $74,573.31 ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the materials are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total work is 66 8 completed as of November 1, 1991. We hereby rec%mend payment of thw voucher. Signed: Zj 4 Signed: Construction Observe y Engineer This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate value for the period covered by this voucher. CONTRACTOR: Widmer, Inc. SIGNED BY: DATE: TITLE: CITY OF SHOREWOOD APPROVED: DATE: TITLE: L VOUCHER NO.: 1 TO: WIDMER, INC. DATE: November 1, 1991 P.O. Box 219 PROTECT: PINE BEND NATERMAIN EXTENSION St. sonifacius, MN 5537S PROJECT NO.: 91 -11 USM COMM. NO.: 4775.10 FOR: City of Shorewood, HN CONTRACT COMPLETE TO DATE TOTAL _ QUANTITY AMOUNT Item Spec. No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost 1 DIV. II Mobilization L.B. 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.5 $750.00 2 DIV. II Cleanup L.S. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 2101.511 Clear i Grub L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 4 2104.501 Remove Pipe (all sizes and types) L.F. 40 $5.00 $200.00 40 $200.00 5 2104.505 Remove Concrete Drive S.Y. 25 $10.00 $250.00 6 2104.505 Remove Bit uminou s Pavement S.Y. 3500 $2:00 $7,000.00 3400 $6,800.00 7 2104.509 Remove Catch Basins Each 2 $200.00 $400.00 2 $400.00 8 2104.513 Sawing Bituminous Pavement L.F. 600 $1.00 $600.00 533 $533.00 9 2104.523 Salvage Castings Each 2 $25.00 $50.00 2 $50.00 10 2105.501 Common Excavation C.Y.. 2000 $4.00 $8,000.00 1900 $7,600.00 11 2211.501 Class 5 (100% crushed rock) Ton 1350 $7.60 $10,260.00 1218 $9,260.07 12 2211.501 Class S (loot crushed rock) Ton 75 $9.60 $720.00 $75.00 $720.00 for Driveways 13 2331.508 Type 41 Nearing Course Ton 300 $28.50 $8,550.00 14 2331.508 Type 41 Wearing Course Ton 50 $49.00 $2,450.00 for Driveways 15 2331.514 Type 31 Base Course Mixture Ton 400 $24.75 $9,900.00 _ 16 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Gal. 175 $1.75 $306.25 . Tack Coat 17 2501.515 15' RCP Apron w /Trash Guard Each 1 $475.00 $475.00 1 $475.00 18 2503.541 15' RCP, Class IV, Design 3006 L.F. 131 $24.00 $3,144.00 131 $3,144.00 19 2506.506 Construct Catch Basin Manhole Each 1 $950.00 $950.00 1 $950.00 20 2506.507 Construct Catch Basins Each 1 $750.00 $750.00 1 $750.00 21 2506.511 Reconstruct Manhole L.F. 10 $100.00 $1,000.00 _ 1 $100.00 22 2506.522 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting Each 6 $160.00- $960.00 5 $,800.00 23 2511.501 Random Rip Rap, Class III C.Y. 17 $40.00 .$680.00 17 $680.00 24 2511.515 Geotextile Fabric, Type IV S.Y. 160 $2.00 $320.00 56 $112.00 2S 2531.507 8618 Concrete Curb i Gutter L.F. 1820 $5.00 $9,100.00 26 2531.507 6' Concrete Driveway Pavement S.Y. 25 $27.00 $675.00 27 2575.505 Sod w /4' Topsoil (lawn type) S.Y. 2200 $1.75 $3,850.00 28 DIV. II Seeding /Mulch, Fart. 6 4' Topsoil Acre 0.2 $1,500.00 $300.00 29 2611.5 12' DIP Class 50 L.F. 230 $20.00 $4,600.00 241 $4,820.00 30 2611.5 8' DIP Class 52 L.F. 1180 $16.30 $19,234.00 1188 $19,364.40 31 2611.5 6' DIP Class 52 L.F 110 $15.75 $1,732.50 118 $1,858.50 32 2611.5 8' Gate Valves i Boxes Each 3 $495.00 $1,485.00 3 $1,485.00 33 2611.5 6' Gate Valve 6 Boxes Each 5 $395.00 $1,975.00 5 $1,975.00 34 2611.5 Hydrants Each 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 4 $4,000.00 35 2611.5 1' Corporation Stops Each 12 $50.00 $600.00 12 $600.00 36 2611.5 1' Curb Stops, 6 Boxes Each 12 $50.00 $600.00 12 $600.00 37 2611.5 1' Copper L.F. 350 $10.00 $3,500.00 339 $3,390.00 38 2611.5 Fittings lbs. 2500 $1.75 $4,375.00 3475 $6,081.25 GRAND TOTAL $117,491.75 $78,498.22 L Orr cam)sx Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612- 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors November 18, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re : Rehabilitation of Lift Stations No. 5 and No. 6 Project No. 91 -3 OSM Comm. No. 4686 City Council Enclosed are four (4) copies of Construction Payment Voucher No. 1 on the referenced project in the amount of t 49,400.00. Please make payment in amount of S at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel,P.E. Project Engineer JAD:RGD Enclosures cc : New Mech Conpanies, Inc. 49,400.00 to New Mech Companies, Inc.., 1633 Eutis St., Lauderdale, Mn. 55108 -1288 Equal Opportunity Employer L Estimate Voucher No. I CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT VOUCHER ------------------- - - - - -- Date November 18, 1991 For Period Ending November 10, 1991 ------------------------------------ - - - - -- ----------------------------- Project No. 91 -3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class of Work Rehabilitation of Lift Stations No. 5 and No. 6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location No. 5 - Edgewood Rd. east of Howard's Point Rd. To New Mech Conpanies, Inc. -------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 1633 Eutis St. No. 6 - Easement - west of Smithtown Rd. Lauderdale, Mn. 55108 -1288 -------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Ph (612) 645 -0451 For City of Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Fax (612) 642 -5591 -------------------------------------------------------- A. Original Contract Amount $ 52,000.00 ------------------------ B. Total Additions f 0.00 ------------------------ C. Total Deductions 6 0.00 ------------------------ D. Total Funds Encumbered f 52,000.00 E. Total Value of Work Certified to Date $ 52,000.00 F. Less Retained Percentage 5 Y $ 2,600.00 6. Less Total Previous Payments $ 0.00 ------------------------ H. Total Payments Including This Voucher $ 49,400.00 I. Balance Carried Forward $ 2,600.00 ------------------------ J. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, T IS VOUCHER $ 49,400.00 APPROVALS ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, and based on our professional opinion, materials are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total work is 99 % completed as of November 10, 1991 . We hereby recommend payment of this voucher. Signed �� � '— - -2 -0 Signed Construction Observer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate estimate for the period covered by this voucher. Contractor : New Mech Conpanies, Inc. Signed By ------------------------------ - - - - -- ---------------------------------------------- Date : Title City of Shorewood Approved for payment Voucher------------------------------ - - - - -- --------------------------------------------- Checked By : Authorized Representative ------------------------------ - - - - -- Date Date --------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Page I of 2 - 4686 L� • E estimate Voucher No. I =ate November 18, 1991 - :ehabilitation of Lift Stations No, 5 and No. 6 project No. 91 -3 or the City of Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Contract Date : April 9, 1991 Work Completed : Contractor : New Mech Conpanies, Inc. 1633 Eutis St. Lauderdale, Mn. 55108 -1288 Ph (612) 645 -0451 Fax (612) 642 -5591. Work Started : June 10, 1991 Completion Date : July 15, 1991 Work Completed Item Contract This Amount Total to Date No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Month This Month Quantity Total Price ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Furnish and install all labor and materials for the complete rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 5 as per plans and specifications. 1 L.S. 27,000.00 27,000.00 B. Furnish and install all labor and materials for the complete rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 6 as per plans and specifications. 1 L.S. 25,000.00 - -- 25,000_00 0 -------- Total Base Bid $ 52,000.00 Total to Date # 52,000.00 • Page 2 of 2 - 4686 1 27,000.00 1 -- 25,000_00 $ 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00 1 27,000.00 1 - -_ 25,000_00 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00 Orr Schelen - 0ASA Mayeron & Associates, Inc 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 - 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers November 18, 1991 Architects Planners Surveyors City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Shady Hills Storm Sewer improvement City Project 91 -1, OSM Comm. No. 4590.08 Pay Voucher No. 1 Dear Mayor and City Council: Enclosed please find Construction Payment Voucher No. 1 on the referenced project in the amount of $7,999.00. Please make payment in the amount of $7,999.00 to Widmer, Inc. at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. i Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer Enclosure c: Widmer, Inc. 3M _Equal Opportunity Employer VOUCHER NO.: 1 DATE: November 1, 1991 PROJECT: SHADY HILLS STORM SEWER IMP. PROJECT NO.: 91 -1 OSM COMM. NO.: 4590.08 FOR: City of Shorewood, MN A. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: B. TOTAL ADDITIONS: C. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS: D. TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED: E. TOTAL VALUE OF WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE: F. LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE: G. LESS TOTAL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: H. TOTAL PAYMENTS INCLUDING THIS VOUCHER: I. ENCUMBERED FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD: J. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER: TO: WIDMER, INC. P.O. Box 219 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 $19,073.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,073.00 5 % $8,420.00 $421.00 $0.00 $7,999.00 ' $11,074.00 $7,999.00 ORR- SCHELEN- 14AYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the materials are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total work is 44 8 completed as of November 1, 1991. We hereby recommend payment of this voucher. Signed: / Z 6 Signed: 6 f / Construction Observef Gfty Engine This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate value for the period covered by this voucher. CONTRACTOR: Widmer, Inc. SIGNED BY: DATE: TITLE: CITY OF SHOREWOOD DATE: 1 APPROVED: TITLE: VOUCHER NO.: 1 TO: WIDMER, INC. DATE: November 1, 1991 P.O. Box 219 PROJECT: SHADY HILLS STORM SEWER IMP. St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 PROJECT NO.: 91 -1 OSM COMM. NO.: 4590.08 FOR: City of Shorewood, MN Item No. Spec. No. Item 1 2104.501 Remove 24• CHP 2 2104.505 Bituminous Removal 3 2104.513 Bituminous Saw -Cut 4 2331.508 Type 41 5 2331.514 Type 31 6 2357.502 Tack Coat 7 2501.525 24' RC apron 8 2503.541 18' RCP Class III 9 2503.541 24 RCP Class II 10 2503.541 24• RCP Class II (arch) 11 2506.509 4021C Low Point CB 12 2531.501 B618 Curb & Gutter 13 DIV. II Clear & Grub Tree 14 DIV. II Sod 15 DIV. II Rip Rap w/ Fabric 16 STD. SPEC. Fence Removal & Replacement 17 2621 Standard Manhole $19,073.00 $8,420.00 • CONTRACT COMPLETE TO DATE TOTAL QUANTITY AMOUNT Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost IF 240 $4.00 $960.00 80 $320.00 SY 220 $2.00 $240.00 IF 200 $2.00 $400.00 TON 15 $70.00 $1,050.00 TON 20 $65.00 $1,300.00 GAL 10 $3.00 $30.00 EACH 1 $375.00 $375.00 1 $375.00 IF 30 $22.50 $675.00 IF 158 $28.50 $4,503.00 150 $4,275.00 IF 50 $36.00 $1,800.00 50 $1,800.00 EACH 5 $600.00 $3,000.00 IF 170 $12.00 $2,040.00 EACH 2 $190.00 $380.00 2 $380.00 SY 600 $1.75 $1,050.00 CY 12 $35.00 $420.00 12 $420.00 IF 20 $7.50 $150.00 20 $150.00 EACH 1 $700.00 $700.00 1 $700.00 $19,073.00 $8,420.00 • Orr Schelen CA)ms N't Mayeron 6 Associates, Inc. • • November 20, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re:" Payment Request Salt /Sand Facility Site Grading City Project 91 -61 OSM Comm. No. 4590.15 Dear Mayor and City Council: 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 -331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Attached please find a payment voucher in the amount of $30,694.50 for the site grading and appurtenant items completed on the referenced project to date. As you are probably aware, the snowstorm on October 31, 1991 left the site inaccessible for further construction this fall. Therefore, NW Asphalt will be unable to complete their part of this project this fall, barring some unusually nice weather to dry the site out. NW Asphalt is willing to extend the performance bond (guaranteeing the full bid price of $81.,064.50) until spring of 1992., We recommend payment in the amount of $30,694.50 to NW Asphalt, subject to final verification of the bond extension by the City Engineer and Finance Director. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer c: NW Asphalt 3N Equal Opportunity Employer VOUCHER NO.: 1 DATE: November 1, 1991 PROJECT: SALT /SAND FACILITY SITE GRADING PROJECT NO.: 91 -51 OSM COMM. NO.: 4590.15 FOR: City of Shorewood, MN A. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: B. TOTAL ADDITIONS: C. TOTAL DEDUCTIONS: D. TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED: E. TOTAL VALUE OF WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE: F. LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE: G. LESS TOTAL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: H. TOTAL PAYMENTS INCLUDING THIS VOUCHER: I. ENCUMBERED FUNDS CARRIED FORWARD: J. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER: TO: NW Asphalt, INC. 1451 County Road 18 Shakopee, MN 55379 -2797 $81,064.50 $0.00 $0.00 $81,064.50 $32,310.00 5 8 $1,615.50 $0.00 $30,694.50 ' $50,370.00 $30,694.50 ORR- SCRELEN- 14AYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the materials are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total work is 39 % completed as of November 1, 1991. We hereby rec9mmend payment of this voucher. Signed: �. 1 �X Signed: Construction Observer ny Engineer This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate value for the period covered by this voucher. CONTRACTOR: NW ASPHALT, INC. SIGNED BY: DATE: TITLE: CITY OF SHOREWOOD DATE: APPROVED: TITLE: t VOUCHER NO.: 1 DATE: CONTRACT November 1, 1991 PROJECT: SALT /SAND FACILITY SITE GRADING PROJECT NO.: 91 -51 OSM COMM. NO.: 4590.15 FOR: Total Coat City of Shorewood, MN Item No. Spec. No. Item 1 0564.602 F 6 I Traffic Sign 2 2021.501 Mobilization 3 2101.501 Clearing 4 2101.506 Grubbing 5 2105.501 Common Excavation 6 2211.501 Aggregate Base, Class 5 7 2331.508 Type 41, Bituminous Wear Course 8 2331.514 Type 31, Bituminous Base Course 9 2501.511 18• CMP Storm Sewer (CS) 10 2501.515 18' CMP Aprons 11 2557.501 6' Chain Link Fence 12 2557.517 Vehicular Gate 13 2573.503 Erosion Control - Silt Fence 14 2575.501 Seeding • TOTAL TO: - NW Asphalt, INC. 1451 County Road 18 Shakopee, MN 55379 -2797 CONTRACT COMPLETE TO DATE TOTAL Unit Quantity Unit Coat Total Coat QUANTITY AMOUNT Each 1 $300.00 $300.00 L.S. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.5 $1,000.00 Acre 3.3 $3,200.00 $10,560.00 3.3 $10,560.00 Acre 3.3 $850.00 $2,805.00 3.3 $2,805.00 C.Y. 12350 $1.22 $15,067.00 12350 $15,067.00 Ton 3460 $8.00 $27,680.00 Ton 160 $27.50 $4,400.00 Ton 320 $24.25 $7,760.00 L.F. 60 $24.00 $1,440.00 40 $960.00 Each 2 $175.00 $350.00 2 $350.00 L.F. 550 $8.95 $4,922.50 Each 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 L.F. 1250 $1.60 $2,000.00 980 $1568.00 Acre 1.3 $600.00 $780.00 $81,064.50 $32,310.00 Orr Schelen CA )ISNI Mayeron & Associates, Inc November 20, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Payment Request Salt /Sand Storage Building City Project 91 -61 OSM Comm. No. 4590.26 Dear Mayor and City Council: 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 - 331 -8660 - FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners Surveyors Attached please find an application for payment in the amount of $32,212.50 for the purchase of the materials, labor, and overhead for the referenced project to date. As you are probably aware, the snowstorm on October 31, 1991 left the site inaccessible for further construction this fall. Therefore, Ebert Construction will be unable to complete the building this fall, barring some unusually nice weather to dry the site out. ' The payment application includes $815.00 to store all of the material inside over the winter, and to guarantee its condition for construction in the spring. We have investigated the possibility of storing the material on City property, but we do not have sufficient space for the large components involved. Ebert has sent us a copy of all the invoices for the material involved, and is willing to extend the performance bond (guaranteeing the full bid price of $47,500.00) until spring of • 1992. We recommend payment in the amount of $32,212.50 to Ebert Construction subject to final verification of the bond extension by the City Engineer and Finance Director. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 00�ezz�" - Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer c: Ebert Construction 30 Equal Opportunity Employer t T N C • N N /A1 x A i = o O C• .<-. !Z9 F 0 0 m d 7CCm0C A A N rdT+-a � N N Y M A 00 T• rn� •• � 7 0 00 ry 0 C A N `> s rn a a°= -�� � -o o =0 O -? 0 a m N D � 0 - - X 2,� >n n c oA " c -'C7 -.{ C Z '... rM oc d S > > > z O' n n n io n N Z C7 O •-{ ° m ro m O-Z D r- o o o > 7 -.. 7 > lu ° CIO R o , o� a 3 c O 7 f9 A m M. C) a• D o. : =M �. n, c r A N 15 Z c N � n c 3 d m T . C T as v d v C O ow m d tr• O C! > t Q� �, fo f0 C o Q 3 Q o V S7 p 7 N t � � ••-I �.7 a � l0 0 m 0 a_ t o � m O d • ^Q - 7. �{ C A f• ,��' ID 3 < 7 C S C y -m _c A b A p,C m�3o C C O � 7 N + A �3 <nco A fl. A 0 A m A N c n N 9 •� Ai C ? 0 m s -- f� R > e 3 S „oo - ,7 o N o n o A 0 C� O C. C- c o W N N_ N VI O m Z . i Q 0 rn i C1 0 N . n T O z T O N ❑❑❑ @ ❑o n>O;- Z =Zc 9 m A O O X ' A z O' n n N O •-{ ° O ro A O-Z D r- 7 o > 7 -.. 7 > lu R , o� a C) O m ° r c c N � c p cn0 - Z O . O M C! > t > o o V 7 N t � � ••-I �.7 A l0 O m 0 a_ L v o � m A A C o� A 3 t Z > o: w. m v ,� C C c rM -1 O ra r O a C) OD v co v_ 01 • o cr O CD TO � v rj Ln c v+ v► 4A v+ O O 3 W 'O p N A N OD I 111 O N N 0 i A I 0 Z X m Z —i -n rn Z -I V 0 fD 0 N N fD n c N O a Nn -! c+ 5 O (D c a O cn -Z D O n m = O Ln LO N O k• N) O O v . N -n (7 o cn cIt N Unl O 0 -A Q � N C =T Z !D C LTJ Ln C O W Cr Q W O a) C X O V n 0 Z Z v m 'M n t"C'I 'T7 0 X \ .. N 0 rs, cn 0 t77. Q � D rrn � a � O r v � o O�� Z 0D O \W O co O -� ko ko O N O •-{ ° O ro O-Z D r- a °Z o > A m C1 Z a cr- a o r c c p cn0 Z s3 M X CA tA c ri m > -i a_ L v o � m A A C o� A 3 t Z > o: w. m v ,� C C c rM -1 O ra r O a C) cr CD TO rj v+ v► 4A v+ 4.+ 3 W p N A N OD I 111 O N W 00 -. N Lri L I . - t • • T Lri O C) O O to O -n rn Z -I V 0 fD 0 N N fD n c N O a Nn -! c+ 5 O (D c a O cn -Z D O n m = O Ln LO N O k• N) O O v . N -n (7 o cn cIt N Unl O 0 -A Q � N C =T Z !D C LTJ Ln C O W Cr Q W O a) C X O V n 0 Z Z v m 'M n t"C'I 'T7 0 X \ .. N 0 rs, cn 0 t77. Q � D rrn � a � O r v � o O�� Z 0D O \W O co O -� ko ko r) > n C j O d Z C ^ 0 r, 2 o c 0 > — N N 1 r+ n n z > CL 3 =. • — 0 A 3 =n r 0 > 9 -� ra n r: O C ; .. E . cra^ v n � r � T a O � m 0 � L X 3 ,r CA "C Z v o 7 7 > > > m _ i nn >_ >_ - a 00C ^ 3: Z z o,�> � C o Z -�, '-,-° .. o 6 CO - l0 V� n C T Z y C1 v 0 W C N O T n N c O O O O O O G ,�•, > Cn W N -• 0 c C' m "� a a 0 X o r w cn tT c+ =3 (7 != O (D 0 Cv N v (D -a CL C+ C+ O (D O O n I z O (D' CO 0 z -S (D �z o o -' > x 4 CL z W N :z -+ W l0 `{ -+ N (n 0) N '< 00 CD Cn O N O •� _ d' r 0 fl - � CT1 O V O O y r CT1 O En O • O p 0 O O O v� O O O cv > �- t 0 = O O O O C) _ p O z r r r r r I c 0 n o a > 1 C3 • C O < fl e t t 1 1 1 t �e O O O O O ' (1 v t O 1 I r r 1 O �. Y � A p` O W 1 n N 60 N N O o co W V V t _ C. On O O O O p p O O O O Z . p - O '- W W N V CD n o w p Oo .° ° -0-4 (n Ul o 0 o 0 0 o + > 0 � n v, Cn = m o O O o o p O O o o o X O 000 t n ae -OR o as p N CO CO cn -< 9 _ i p O O 01 V O • O n "> - O CT1 O • O O L nNrl O . p p _ ... C) p O O O O n c Ul O W W I _ u N V O U" CTI O z • O • r > CT1 O CT1 r. O I O O O O %Z p V m r) > n C j O d Z C ^ 0 r, 2 o c 0 > — N N 1 r+ n n z > CL 3 =. • — 0 A 3 =n r 0 > 9 -� ra n r: O C ; .. E . cra^ v n � r � T a O � m 0 � L X 3 ,r CA "C Z v o 7 7 > > > m _ i nn >_ >_ - a 00C ^ 3: Z z o,�> � C o Z -�, '-,-° .. o 6 CO - l0 V� n C T Z y C1 v 0 W C N O T n N RESOLUTION NO. -91 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1992 GENERAL, WATER SEWER AND RECYCLING FUND BUDGETS AND APPROVING THE 1991 PROPERTY TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1992 WHEREAS, the 1992 General, Water, Sewer and Recycling Fund Budgets, including 1991 property tax levies collectible in 1992, for the City of Shorewood was submitted and made available for public review at City Hall on November 20, 1991; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing, upon notice duly given, was held on November 25, 1991, for the purpose of receiving comments from the public regarding the adoption of such budgets and property tax levies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the 0 . ' City of Shorewood as follows: 1. That the following budgets are adopted for 1992: General Fund $2,381,191.00 Water Fund 166,059.00 Sewer Fund 532,051.00 Recycling Fund 69,986.00 2. That the following sums be levied for 1990, collectible in 1992, upon taxable property in the City of Shorewood for the following purposes: General Fund General Obligation Water Storm Sewer District No. Total Levy 3. That the City A instructed to transmit a certified County Auditor of Hennepin County, $1,840,663.00 Revenue Bonds 15,500.00 2 8.414.00 $1,864,577.00 dministrator /Clerk is hereby copy of this resolution to the Minnesota. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 25th day of November, 1991. Barbara Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk 'a RESOLUTION NO. -91 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL PREMISES WHEREAS, Shorewood City Code Section 904.15, Subdivision 1, provides for the City Council , by resolution, to establish rates and charges for use and services of the sanitary sewer system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the charge for use and service of the sanitary sewer system for residential premises which may have a connection directly or indirectly into the City sanitary sewer system shall be $54.75 per quarter. 2. That the rates and charges for use and services of the sanitary sewer system for nonresidential premises which may have a connection directly or indirectly into the City sanitary sewer system, and which premises discharge only normal sewage into such system, shall be charged as follows: (a) Minimum Charges: The minimum quarterly charge shall be $65.60 for flowage up to and including 28,500 gallons. (b) Metered Charges: For flowage over the minimum of 28,500 gallons, the metered flow charge shall be $2.30 per 1,000 gallons, payable quarterly. 3. That these rates for residential and nonresidential sanitary sewer usage shall be effective January 1, 1992. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 25th day of November, 1991. Barbara Brancel, Mayor ATTEST: James C. Hurm, City Administrator /Clerk i MAYOR ` Barb Brancel — _ COUNCI L _ Kristi Stover Bob Gggne .' Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF O - 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 •,(612) 474 -3236 Re: Storage of Recreational Vehicle - Dear Mr. Wittman: - Due to neighborhood complaints, we have inspected your property for compliance with storage requirements of recreational vehicles. As a result, our inspection finds that a large boat is being stored improperly on your property. As per Section 1201.12 Subd. 3.a., and Section 1201.03 Subd. 3.c.(7) of the City Code (attached), recreational vehicles and equipment may be stored within the buildable area of the lot. For your information, we have attached a survey of your property indicating the buildable area (shaded portion). Please note that setbacks are measured from property lines, not the paved surface of the street. Your property will be reinspected in -ten (10) days from the date hereof to assure compliance with this requirement of the Shorewood City Code. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact our office. CITY OF SHOREWOOD - - Bradley J. Nielsen - Planning Director ■ _ cc: Jdcda _ Dave gren A Residential on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I C14 ` Barb B� K Stov i Bob Gagn', . r - _ Rob Daugherty: ! Daniel Lewis' ._ . - - � ._ CITY, OF - . - . •_ . :. =� : - `. : SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY -CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD,- MINNESOTA 55331 ,+ (612) 474 -3236 r DATE: 28 October 1991 TO:,,, Amercian Legion Post 259 24450.- Smithtown Road - -� - Shorewood, MN 55331 - - PROPERTY LOCATION: 24560 Smithtown Road lot) PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: 33- 117 -23 -13 -0011 - - NOTICE TO REMOVE Offensive and Unhealthy Substances - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there exists a condition on the above referenced • property which is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 of the Shorewood City Code, a copy of which Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes, but is not limited to the following: White pickup topper with "Blue Flame Contractor" signage - You are hereby required to remove the above - described matter and any other offensive matter located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 within ten (10) days from the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. If you do not respond to this Notice within ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lein against the property. _ * ** PLEASE GIVE THIS MATTER YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION * ** ^ BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore '' ) Z� ,so ICJ a 0 �lf ATFe,d I�ettfr M � MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 -3236 MEMO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James C. Hurm, City Administrator DATE: November 20, 1991 RE: Summary of Responses to Old Market Road Transportation Task Force Recommendations PHASE ONE RECOMMENDATIONS: # 1 - Open intersection to frontage road only. Do not open Old Market Road South of frontage road until Vinehill intersection is improved. - • The City Council has passed Resolution No.f14 -91 requesting the State to expeditiously complete the Vine Hill Road intersection project at State Highway 7. • Police Chief Young prefers the intersection be fully operable to provide for faster and safer emergency vehicle access to the entire southeast area. • MnDOT Engineer Glen Ellis states that if the intersection is not open to traffic, $140,000 would be deducted from the City's next project and $360,000 of State cooperative • agreement funds will not be released to the City for this project. # 2 - Continue monitoring traffic at key locations. • Monitoring of traffic should continue. • Police Chief supports. # 3 - Continue working with Minnetonka regarding completion of Townline and resulting traffic it will create on Vinehill /Covington /Old Market Rd. • City will continue communicating with Minnetonka on this issue. • Joel Dresel's letter documents his latest communications. • Police Chief supports this recommendation. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka 's South Shore. , PHASE ONE RECOMMENDATIONS - CONTINUED # 4 - Leave Covington Road as a "T" into Vinehill and amend comp plan to conform with this recommendation. This is referred to the Planning Commission and will be an issue in reviewing the transportation component of the Comprehensive Plan in early 1992.` PHASE TWO RECOMMENDATION (occurs when Old Market Road opens South of Frontage Road). # 1 Install stop signs on Old Market Road at Waterford Place. 0 Old Market Road /Covington Road will have stop signs at the State Highway 7 service road, Vine Ridge and Vine Hill Roads. • The Police Chief's memorandum states an- additional stop sign at Waterford Place is not merited.` # 2 - Install "Children Crossing Signs" on Old Market Road at Muirfield N. & S., Waterford Place, Chartwel.l Hill and Covington. • Police Chief feels a study should be undertaken to identify the most effective placement of such signs. He cautions against overuse. Police will work with the Planning Department and School District to identify the most effective locations. # 3 - Reduce Speed along Old Market Road /Covington to 25 mph. • MnDOT Traf f is Engineer Ed Brown states he will attempt to have _a final determination or at least a preliminary indication of the speed limit study by Monday's meeting. • Copied for your information is the relevant State Statute . (refer attached 169.14, Subd.5) # 4 - Encourage Police to ticket violators of speed or stop signs. • Police Department can be requested to emphasize patrol in this area after opening and intermittently thereafter. # 5 - Install sidewalk along Old Market Road. • A six foot sidewalk is recommended along Covington Road when it is improved as an MSA street. No year has been identified for this work. Sidewalk could be installed along Old Market and Covington without using MSA funds but special assessments to adjacent property owners is the only available funding source. -2- PHASE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS - CONTINUED # 6 - Consider AM /PM traffic reversal 7 - 9 a.m.: Northbound traffic only 4 - 6 p.m.: Southbound traffic only • The Police Chief is strongly opposed to this recommendation Additional recommendation regarding school buses picking up children on both sides of Old Market /Covington Roads. • Minnetonka School District Transportation Supervisor Schmidt submitted a thoughtful letter which explains why they can not guarantee that children will be picked up on both sides of Old Market /Covington Roads. • Wednesday, November 20th, I met with Mr. Schmidt. He indicated that at this time there are five elementary students and one kindergardener from Chartwell Hill that cross Covington Road to get to the school bus. The return bus drops them off on the Chartwell Hill side so they do not have to cross. Their records indicate no other students need to cross Old Market/ Covington Roads. The Police Department is monitoring what is actually taking place and will report by the November 25th meeting. JCH.al Attachment cc: Old Market Road Task Force Members (David Dean, Harold Ness, Robert Snyder & James Finstuen) Police Chief Young On Schelen Mayeron & NMI 4 ISO Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 - 331 -8660 FAX 331 -3806 Engineers Architects Planners November 13, 1991 surveyors City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Town Line Road Dear Mayor and City Council: We have recently been in contact with Mr. David Sonnenberg, City Engineer for the City of Minnetonka, regarding the status of the proposed upgrading of Town Line Road. According to Mr. Sonnenberg, the preliminary plans for that portion from I494 to CR4 have been approved, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet is currently under consideration, and construction for this portion could very well be under way in 1992. The portion from CR4 west to TH101 will be in the planning stages while the easterly portion is under construction. There are no current plans for an upgrade west of TH101. The City of Minnetonka has in the past looked at the possibility of upgrading Vine Hill Road between TH7 and Town line Road, and may be willing to designate their half as an MSA route if Shorewood decides to pursue the idea. However, this is based on very preliminary information, and much additional data would have to be looked at to make a final decision. Sincerely, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel A. Dresel, P.E., L.S. City Engineer ..Equal Opportunity Employer 10 .m.sr.v aaw.aaaxravf w - .ReuplWl.ia�rlefmr :- 'saF.s «.Y .•.rmetaa.e..+w.- ....�_r_ e+,ak •c:,: +.«r z a...., .r ...a.....arv.w,an,..•,n ... wpry: _ "• q d� 9 ., O C A d � c LLbl2 U ' i V •nv vuz s +nr wr[ •,! A' \�« ;. O . Yq d0ry 1 s lv A i A., l e ry e" 's Y IwoMON `a+EI 1 d. Y 41 1l1 V a rcN as 4 viw1.�i' ¢ h rti�, K td ,P7 •� •flu - ' ♦tl - rd \ `' 4 �`� A t ! ,q,/d A ro P f w .: . vVa:l 'anY .apvJ < lA ' NA O 4 nY uolfiu, oolB Ifiu,wu ° - 1 k_ ^4 a ed' �♦ 6 A'' l yy I ay t y c Irl _ o In cr -v pfiaa,y� U E., Paa ll.ad M a O a r aail.o � m oLC 3 _Y .f y'1 O N f �+ A tyRd Y4 Ill � s � °' � _ � � Q � . ♦ � ♦r �A � L' #' o s am Iv11oa1N - Iloalq J " in anv Ivtlnn N o puv. tl . 51 '� t. _ —�— _ 1� _ —, O 3 v,F�t�* W a ,{?�' •y� Y � .pL � I r S 1 ,�yY�• .y M N t •t S '♦ Jl ,�I�'C�� L i c 3 n � /1 � 3 3 CY anY aawaf � I,r ^wY� V r�V{i +J�` ;31W. °. ' 6 T� � 's uad f•1 W anY vuad am fal .uad 'h,a. N pN a ''•I?'`pg 3 - N - _ _ Mile ° ^ s -a r a Y 1.1 alas u n m " pAY v, ♦% w /m�/maa m aaaas ¢ �• ! * &� � I ,M.: am a,oA^ 3 C4i im ~ an4 - aua.f � am as al3 3 � "Y a� aau a,3 AP p ^�iw ry „o aa. U ' • ala ppVVM ; alvp ;o DooM a X ' o _ nC b >k Illatl _ � O ul ll•B �% Y M pnitl alvpua w,oN '� �"•1 a « V. a � a ° o Y ° anv a1 - _ `",',� ^'q a mY r� { s 3 f•1 N..A ".O aae„ ^ n °b O b a•/ ,: (Q �.;. ry;'F tI t .Y �° C i �; " < T , 1 Y ` o N OI � a f u Pn .afiav 'o a w > JJJJ n a m O - 40 a o 3 O ° 0 o r O ` i- snV vN' °n O �^ O + U o Fr ,m .��0 m pn C �Yypyval an0 00 Bloomin9lon ° o Y P d • s •' n A 19 uloapl o F} I:V ;.� pa0 co Ptl ; j d Aq2 VIS � l� w O _ O P I A allt 3 �� )t � t r �Q ' o1u ad • Y. S sp i z c • ' • °j b ° nr. VIII a0 c •a p r � u ° OJ b a o pry dD � " Ti � 51 1: � � Ql ! ik� a,r vlu z '�' NI ". � °'` ♦n,ea d y !` 8$ T. ;¢ �; ^jj+P,; � ° II g5;}1a.1 ,p < .. o ' A9 pavyla; �� ,or v y�:J�m I �d�FV� w 'ptl awN Vaam ; O sn wx oxP _ on m ° " X90 r {y �a Ai ail W „a e r . np P. Ptl a pI puala �Aan9lalua V — - y Ptl a Ila4 aI1W ^" � I C j Q c \a � i � � .�`� � r ar• a �5�• a � Y A �• ° o � i7 !' ^ l �> � „, Cp {+, _ a u + p A •uul a,n a , C - - u c ms..s w 5' W vYUOA V T ' a � - fPl A FF O �`F Ptl alnv.d -,I'd uap3 ^ a� WS i.. q : n p4 syvl a 0 .aaaV •� -- J v I V .Yw! � .ptl }N �� �' #: Z,• AF i'k: lY � ,. ° - •D ^ cam♦ �2 J "V � a IA 9aavm N �K \.[ � I if vn �1s • N •aA Va`. aC`b ... O^ tl 4v� d T C' , 4r 0 n a{ c q ` \ ^ I Vu� ti � • r � y \\ O ` �•w � - o� 1 � ! .F Y vp p p I �'. b �"' �� �� p4r\ a 1F 1, 3 !{ is r ^ • M y� C u 14 Ia ♦ � r N4 d ,r r 4 F• CD � o ' + v to .- .... ya u 1 N. ,. S N m p " . y a aw o ,• l J S! Y a w ♦ / 3 1y t o ptl Ow x V 1 s ` •� Jz � A e :C � I pa, o ,� > �' C ♦ F '' 4a I o � ' vv la � {h r � PV 'h • 4 p � ... 1 �•'�� , � \ �� �.�� 1 p � 6�� ��� 5 iz � X r P 2 bNk �1 i ! r ti,}�. ! � x �♦ r /� p _— br rk daF- ,N ?" � � K Yt. d , 1 t ° s., r � d t, 1 , � i j Z a � w e."J' / w J M '`a•• �' ' yL ry, ,� S�# rP 3 d 4 � 4. • m � \ � p ¢ i.3, z """'� pP lll {(` t'f aaa ,a ! d `' '�' -^"p � V �4 •'�s �S � „'�£?J` 0 r � i 4 , � u a� % � r 1 ♦I �� I �+i .q t � r A 2 �q r. {: J !_ rr �t7.a on � �: � o!� ,a,l••a �f �. l � r + •e �: ��, tr ° I• M� � C ; �'�'� 4 �•' ��(( ,. w 4 1, m 41 S-t•- - "ES °T 7u q y Minnesota Department of Transportation �° `�` Metropolitan District a Transportation Building 3�4> TROD' St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 OF T' Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 November 13, 1991 Reply to Golden Valley Office NOV 1 ,, Telephone No. .593 -8502 Ms. Barb Branzil Mayor of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 RE: S.P. 2706 (T.H. 7) At Old Market Road Dear Ms. Branzil: This is a followup to our recent telephone conversation regarding the above referenced intersection. Since there is pressure from local residents to prevent that intersection from opening to traffic, the following information may be of help to you. There are three types of funding for this intersection. There is $140,000 of state aid funds, $920,000 of City tax increment financing funds and $360,000 of cooperative agreement funds. I discussed this intersection with our State.Aid Office, and they indicate that if this intersection is not open to traffic that the $140,000 would not be taken from this project, but would be deducted from the next state aid project of the City's. They also indicated that this street cannot simply be closed because any state aid street must have logical termini. Attached is a copy of a letter dated November 7, 1991, from our State Aid Office to Joel Dressel of OSM which explains the issue of state aid street termini. • The main benefit to the State with this project was to include the closing of some right -in and right -out access to T.H. 7. The District would still like to see those closed regardless of the status of this intersection. I have discussed the status of T.H. 7 at Dinehill with our Right of Way Office to see if there was any way of speeding up that process. They have indicated to me that they do not anticipate that being possible, and that they may not make the October 1993 letting. This is partly because of a shortage of personnel in the District and Central Office, and also the extensive process that must be gone through to acquire the right of way which does take time. The cooperative agreement for the $360,000 has not been started as yet by our Municipal Agreements Section. They have indicated to me that if the intersection is not opened to traffic the agreement will not be written and no payment will be made to the City. An Equal Opportunity Employer Ms. Barb Branzil November 13, 1991 Page Two There will probably need to be a decision made as to the configuration of this intersection area if the City Council does in fact vote to keep it closed. A decision will need to be made as to the need for restoring the intersection area to -its previous geometrics. So far that issue has not been discussed in detail, but will need to be addressed. I hope this information helps you for your November 18 Council meeting. If you have any additional questions or need any additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely, $A Glen C. Ellis, P.E. District Final Design Engineer Enclosure • • Nov ► 2 1991 N ovember 11, 1991 Mr. J i m Hurm Shorewood City Administrator Sh o rewood City Hall 5755 JJ Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55317 Mr. Hur•m, This is to follow October. Forgive been focused on t the "snowstorm of Minnetonka to Public Schools. Learning Today for Leading Tomorrow up to our phone conversation from late rare if this is not timely, but my energy ransportat i.on irregularities caused by the cent ury" until now. You asked if the school tranportation service would be able to guarantee pick up and delivery of students on the same side of the road they live � n along Covington Road and Old Market Road in the near future. My response was as follows. Minnetonka Schoo D istrict is not in a po sition to beg in offering guarantees that students will not be required to cro the road a secondary roadways. The mission of a public schools transportation system is to provide a mean' of mass transpo between ho me and scho for . all resident students in a manner which is as equitable as possible. Restated, this means that what is done for one neighborhood is offered as a service throughout the district. The district would not be able to offer same side pick up and drop ,off to the many neighborhoods within its 32.5 square mile boundary because of the limitations on its operational revenue. Servicing each side of a roadway individually translates into more operational costs s beca use more time and buses would be required to do the job. This does not mean that a critical safety issue exists where children need to cross a street or roadway to ride a school bus. Minnesota has a long standing school bus sto p-arm law w requires motorists to sto and remain stopped when approaching a school bus which has an extended stop -arm and flashing red eight -way lights. Motorists who _violate the stop -arm law may be charged with a gross misdemeanor. This carries a fine of up to $3000-00 00 car one year in jail. (612) 470 -3400 FAX (612) 470 -3432 Business Office 261 School Avenue, Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Students are also instructed in appropriate ways to conduct themselves when near roadways, crossing roadways, and entering or departing from the school bus. School bus drivers forward a misbehavior report to school principals when they observe unsafe behavior of students near roads. Finally, it is important for city representatives and real estate developers to plan new roadways and housing developments with the needs of school children in mind. Wide roadways with a shoulder or sidewalk for pedestrian and bicycle traffic are important safety considerations. Forethought as to where children will be able to stand when-waiting for the bus is also a factor parents often look for before buying a home, or complain about before selling a home. Safety of children at neighborhood school bus stops is � the result of the conscious efforts of many people. It � does not depend entirely, however, on whether or not children need to cross the road. / I hope these thoughts are helpful in addressing your . current concerns. ' Sincerely, Transportation Supervisor 0 ti_ \NNESoT �9 ^� �o a OF Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 NOV 8 1991 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to Telephone No. 593 -8408 November 7, 1991 Mr. Joe Dresel Orr - Schelen - Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 • RE: M.S.A.P. 216 - 111 -01, Old Market Road Dear Mr. Dresel: It has come to my attention that the City of Shorewood, is considering revoking and /or vacating portions of Old Market Road of which M.S.A.P. 216 - 111 -01 is included. Since you are the City Engineer of Shorewood, I am advising you of the Rules and Statutes concerning revocation, and payback on revoked state -aid routes. According to Chapter 162.09 Subd. 9, "any municipal state -aid street may be abandoned, changed, or revoked as such by joint action of the Commissioner of Transportation and the governing body of the city within which the street is located." Furthermore, if a local unit of government revokes a state -aid route for which state -aid construction money was spent, the value of the remaining life of the project must be subtracted from the next state -aid contract let by the local unit of government. The remaining life of the project will be based upon the • number of years the street was in service after the date of completed construction subtracted from 25. The life of a construction project is 25 years. Also, if revocation is to occur, revocation can only occur between logical termini; such as, Municipal State Aid Streets, County State Aid Highways or Trunk Highways. There must be continuity in the system, no Municipal State Aid Street can be "dead ended." After reviewing your situation it appears that if the portion of the Old Market Road that is nearing construction is revoked, the remaining portion of Old Market Road and Covington Road (from Old Market Road to Vine Hill Road) must also be revoked as a Municipal State Aid Street, unless continuity can be assured in another manner. Also, the contract amount (State Aid Funds) on M.S.A.P. 216 - 111 -01 will be subtracted from the next State Aid contract. Please advise the City of Shorewood of the process involved in revocation and the nature of the consequences of revocation. MINNESOTA 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer .. If I can be of any further help, do not hesitate to call myself or Mr. Elmer Morris (779- 1173). Sincerely, Elliott R. Ruhland, P.E. Acting District State Aid Engineer cc: William Crawford, District Engineer Dennis Carlson,.State Aid Engineer Elmer Morris, Oakdale Glen Ellis, Golden Valley ' ■ i .01 SOUTH LAKE AIENNETONKA PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 810 Excelsior Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG (612) 4743261 Chief of Police M E M O R A N D U M To: James C. Hurm, City Administrat r From: Richard Young, Police Chief Date: November 5, 1991 Subject: Old Market Road - Request for Input I and my staff have reviewed the material you submitted regarding Old Market Road becoming a through street. Many of the recommendations of the Transportation Task Force are excellent suggestions and meet with the full agreement of this office. However, there are some which do not. I will review all of them. Phase One Recommendations: 1. This department would prefer the full intersection with Old Market Road be opened. This would provide for faster and, more importantly, safer emergency vehicle access to the entire southeast portion of the City of Shorewood. We do not agree that this should, in effect, be held hostage for pressure to improve the Vine Hill intersection. The Vine Hill intersection is extremely congested and dangerous. If the Old Market intersection will relieve some of that congestion and make it safer, we feel it • should be done. However, it appears that this question may be a moot point with the early snow storms effectively halting construction of the project. We would urge that the Highway 7 shoulder work be given high priority if any further work can be accomplished this year. 2. We support continued monitoring. 3. We support this recommendation. 4. At this time, we have no position on this recommendation. Phase Two Recommendations: 1. The Minnesota Uniform Manual on Traffic Control Devices sets specific warrants for the placement of stop signs. This intersection does not meet those warrants. Serving South Ida Mhv&aonka Communities of F=dsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay Z. While some of these signs may be warranted, we caution against their overuse which this recommendation seems to do. The proliferation of these signs will diminish any effectiveness they may have. We believe additional study is needed to best determine the most effective placement of any such signs. 3. This determination is controlled by the State of Minnesota. I would not expect that they would reduce the speed limit on this road from the statutory limits without good reasons such as reduced visibility, narrow road, winding road, many high traffic side streets, major business traffic or extremely high accident rate caused by speed, none of which apply to this newly designed collector street. 4. We strongly agree with ticketing violators, however feel that additional encouragement is not really needed as-all officers are currently very proficient in this regard. 5. A sidewalk would certainly improve the safety factor for pedestrians. 6. While a good brainstorming type idea, we do not believe it would work in practice. Therefore, we are totally opposed to this recommendation. We do not see it as practical. It would, in our opinion, be a virtual impossible situation for the average driver to comprehend. People drive right by large red stop signs and bright red traffic lights now and claim they never saw them. We just do not see how such a system could work. The potential for major accidents is immense. It would be very confusing and require frequent, if not constant patrol to protect the drivers obeying the law from those that, inadvertently, are not. The additional recommendation concerning the school bus picking up children from both directions is one for the school to decide. However, I would point out that on other roads with much more traffic, ie. County 19, the school does not do this. • � ,�0 2 a OF P� Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building Nov - -6 1991 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 November 4, 1991 James C. Hurm, Administrator City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Speed Zoning - City of Shorewood Old Market Road /Covington Road Reply to :5801 Duluth Street, Golden Valley, MV 55422 Telephone No 591 -4617 Dear Mr. Hurm: Speed zoning studies have been placed on our agenda for the following roads as requested in your October 31 letter: Old Market Road from T.H. 7 to Covington Road Covington Road - from Old Market Road to Vine Hill Road Good weather and road conditions are required as are normal traffic conditions to determine the optimal speed limit for a road. It is therefore unlikely we can make a definite speed limit determination until the road opens to traffic and weather conditions improve. It might be possible to provide the initial reaction you requested prior to the November 12 city council meeting. Such an assessment would be based on examination of the construction plans and would, of course, not necessarily be the same as the final speed limit determination. We will try to obtain a copy of the plans from our district state aid office, but since there is little time before the November 12 meeting, it might be beneficial if Shorewood would provide us with a copy as insurance. Please send the plans to me at our Golden Valley office. If you have questions, my telephone number is 591 -4617. Sincerely, Ed Brown Traffic Engineering EB:pl MINNFSOiPA 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer 4458 of any boundary water, or 4459 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 169.14 24, 1986 c 444, (2) in a parking lot ordinarily used by or available to the public though not as a c 602 art 2 s 3, 169.13 RECKLESS OR CARELESS DRIVING. matter of right, and a driveway connecting such a parking lot with a street or highway. Subdivision 1. Reckless driving. Any person who drives any vehicle in such a man- 2d as fbUoVM ner as to indicate either a willful or a wanton disregard for the safety of persons or prop- adant concerning the erty is guilty of reckless driving and such reckless driving is a misdemeanor. nenability to rehabfli- as defined in section Subd. 2. Careless driving. Any person who operates or halts any vehicle upon any street or highway carelessly or heedlessly in disregard of the rights of others, or in a new registration manner that endangers or is likely to endanger any property or any person, including rules adopted by the the driver or passengers of the vehicle, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A& Subd. 3. Application. The provisions of this section apply, but are not limited in rkal pmt one-on- lion of them; or application, to any person who drives any vehicle in the manner prohibited by this sec- Subdivision 1. Basic rule. No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed tion: (1) upon the ice of any lake, stream, or river, including but not limited to the ice CE. of any boundary water, or or 169.123, the (2) in a parking lot ordinarily used by or available to the public though not as a n which driving matter of right, and a driveway connecting such a parking lot with a street or highway. xms are: (1) suc- terms of alcohol History- (2720-177) 1937 c 464 s 27, 1939 c 430 s 5; 1947 c 428 s 11; 1967 c 569 s er requirements 2, - Ex1971 c 27 s 7; 1983 c 236 s 1; 1984 c 622 s 15 Le commissioner )rder under sec- 169.131 [Repealed, 1976 c 103 s 1] new registration W 169.132 [Repealed, 1977 c 347 s 29] otify the person :)r without valid A& 169.14 SPEED RESTRICTIONS. ject to criminal -4, Subdivision 1. Basic rule. No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event speed shall be so restricted S as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care. Y Subd. 2. Speed limits. Where no special hazard exists the following speeds shall ales to carry out be lawful, but any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the 31, 1985, emer- speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that the speed limit islature pertain- -Ak, within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall The rules may be unlawful: clearly the right failure (1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district; fences of of driving privi- (2) 65 miles per hour in other locations during the daytime; ses. (3) 55 miles per hour in such. other locations during the nighttime; s 14.01 to 14.20 (4) ten miles per hour in alleys. "Daytime" means from a half hour before sunrise to a half hour after sunset, except 1 85 c 4 s 6 at any time when due to weather or other conditions there is not sufficient light to ren der clearly discernible persons and vehicles at a distance of 500 feet. "Nighttime means at any other hour or at any time when due to weather or other conditions there m or is in physical is not sufficient light to render clearly discernible persons and vehicles at a distance of ense, within this 500 feet. section 169.121 Subd. 3. Reduced speed required. The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with :ense or driver's the requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and cross- revocation, or ing an intersection or railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a 171.04, 171.14, curve, when approaching a hill crest, when traveling upon any narrow or winding road- n 609.2 1, subdi- way, and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by .21, subdivision reason of weather or highway conditions. )n over prosecu- Subd. 4. Establishment of zones by commissioner. On determining upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any speed set forth in this section is 0, 1990 c 602 art greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist on any trunk highway or upon any part thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs designating a reasonable and safe speed limit thereat, which speed limit shall be effec I Elm 169.14 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 4460 4461 tive when such signs are erected. Any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie is established, anc evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that of the resolution s any speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in erection of the sig excess thereof shall be unlawful. On determining upon that basis that a part of the trunk Subd. 5c. Sp: highway system outside a municipality should be a zone of maximum speed limit, the for alleyways as d commissioner may establish that part as such a zone by erecting appropriate signs showing the beginning and end of the zone, designating a reasonable and safe speed investigations. All be effective when therefor, which may be different than the speed set forth in this section, and that it is a zone of maximum speed limit. The speed so designated by the commissioner within Subd. 5d. Sp; temporary trunk h any such zone shall be a maximum speed limit, and speed in excess of such limit shall jurisdiction, may zi be unlawful. The commissioner may in the same manner from time to time alter the boundary of such a zone and the speed limit therein or eliminate such zone. zones. The commi Subd. 5. Zoning within local areas. When local authorities believe that the existing and traffic investi� zone. speed limit upon any street or highway, or part thereof, within their respective jurisdic- - The minimulr tions and not a p art of the trunk h i gh way s ystem is P gh y y greater or less than is reasonable speed limit must n or safe under existing conditions, they may request the commissioner to authorize, by more than 15 r- upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, the erection of appropriate not exceed 40 mile signs designating what speed is reasonable and safe, and the commissioner may autho- - of appropriate reg . rize the erection of appropriate signs designating a reasonable and safe speed limit - affected work zone thereat, which speed limit shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds A speed greater th< in excess of these speed limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reason- - of =_ For purposes c able or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within any munici- -� . way or street whe: pality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful. Alteration of speed limits on streets and highways shall be made only upon authority Y �_ maintaining the pi Y P Y of the commissioner except as provided in subdivision 5a. to the roadway, in Subd. 5a. Speed zoning in school zones. Local authorities may establish a school nances. Subd. 6. [Rep-, speed limit within a school zone of a public or nonpublic school upon the basis of an '. Subd. 7. Burdc engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed by the commissioner of transporta - tion. The establishment of a school speed limit on any trunk highway shall be with the =z- shall not be constru consent of the commissioner of transportation. Such school speed limits shall be in ing negligence on t Subd. 8. Mini effect when children are present, going to or leaving school during opening or closing hours or during school recess periods. The school speed limit shall not be lower than L: traffic investigatior, 15 miles per hour and shall not be more than 20 miles per hour below the established -' mined minimum i portion thereof, the speed limit on an affected street or highway if the established speed limit is 40 miles ; �, speed on such high-, per hour or greater. The school speed limit shall be effective upon the erection of a si gns P appropriate si s des- n *? < such signs are erect facie evidence ignating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the reduced speed zone. Any that Subd. 9. Stanc speed in excess of such posted school speed limit is unlawful. All such signs shall be gn a motor vehicle is erected by the local authorities on those streets and highways under their respective = the speedometer the jurisdictions and by the commissioner of transportation on trunk highways. in traffic law enforc For the purpose of this subdivision, "school zone" means that section of a street or highway which abuts the grounds of a school where children have access to the street tested for accuracy having control of sa or highway from the school property or where an established school crossing is located shall be prima facic provided the school advance sign prescribed by the manual on uniform traffic control . observed, traveling devices adopted by the commissioner of transportation pursuant to section 169.06 is amount of error, if in place. All signs erected by local authorities to designate speed limits in school zones said reading. shall conform to the manual on uniform control devices. Records of spe Subd. 5b. Segments in urban districts. When any segment of at least a quarter -mile t enforcement agenc in distance of any city street, municipal state aid street or town road on which a speed said tests. Such rec limit in excess of 30 miles per hour has been established pursuant to an engineering and herein shall be coi traffic investigation by the commissioner meets the definition of "urban district" as impeachment ofevi defined in section 169.01, subdivision 59, the governing body of the city or town may ant to the rules of e by resolution declare the segment to be an urban district and may establish on the seg- Subd. 10. Rada ment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in subdivision 2. The speed limit t which the rate of spe so established shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the on radar or other spc speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit conditions: 169.14 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 4460 tive when such signs are erected. Any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful. On determining upon that basis that a part of the trunk highway system outside a municipality should be a zone of maximum speed limit, the commissioner may establish that part as such a zone by erecting appropriate signs showing the beginning and end of the zone, designating a reasonable and safe speed therefor, which may be different than the speed set forth in this section, and that it is a zone of maximum speed limit. The speed so designated by the commissioner within any such zone shall be a maximum speed limit, and speed in excess of such limit shall be unlawful. The commissioner may in the same manner from time to time alter the boundary of such a zone and the speed limit therein or eliminate such zone. Subd. 5. Zoning within local areas. When local authorities believe that the existing speed limit upon any street or highway, or part thereof, within their respective jurisdic- tions and not a part of the trunk highway system is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under existing conditions, they may request the commissioner to authorize, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, the erection of appropriate signs designating what speed is reasonable and safe, and the commissioner may autho- rize the erection of appropriate signs designating a reasonable and safe speed limit thereat, which speed limit shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds in excess of these speed limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reason- able or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within any munici- pality shall be a maximum limit and any speed' in excess thereof shall be unlawful. Alteration of speed limits on streets and highways shall be made only upon authority of the commissioner except as provided in subdivision 5a. Subd. 5a. Speed zoning in school zones. Local authorities may establish e a school speed limit within a school zone of a public or nonpublic school upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed by the commissioner of transporta- tion. The establishment of a school speed limit on any trunk highway shall be with the consent of the commissioner of transportation. Such school speed limits shall be in effect when children are present,' going to or leaving school during opening or closing hours or during school recess periods. The school speed limit shall not be lower than 15 miles per hour and shall not be more than 20 miles per hour below the established speed limit on an affected street or highway if the established speed limit is 40 miles per hour or greater. The school speed limit shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs des- ignating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the reduced speed zone. Any speed in excess of such posted school speed limit is unlawful. All such signs shall be erected by the local authorities on those streets and highways under their respective jurisdictions and by the commissioner of transportation on trunk highways. For the purpose of this subdivision, "school zone" means that section of a street j ' or highway which abuts the grounds of a school where children have access to the street or highway from the school property or where an established school crossing is located provided the school advance sign prescribed by the manual on uniform traffic control devices adopted by the. commissioner of transportation pursuant to section 169.06 is in place. All signs erected by local authorities to designate speed limits in school zones shall conform to the manual on uniform control devices. Subd. 5b. Segments in urban districts. When any segment of at least a quarter -mile in distance of any city street, municipal state aid street or town road on which a speed limit in excess of 30 miles per hour has been established pursuant to an engineering and traffic investigation by the commissioner meets the definition of "urban district" as defined in section 169.01, subdivision 59, the governing body of the city or town may by resolution declare the segment to be an urban district and may establish on the seg- ment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in subdivision 2. The speed limit so established shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit 0 4461 4460 its shall be prima facie Unlawful; except that mit and any speed in hat a part of the trunk mum speed limit, the ing appropriate signs nable and safe speed section, and that it is commissioner within !ss of such limit shall ime to time alter the e such zone. lieve that the existing it respective jurisdic- ss than is reasonable ssicne,6-,to authorize, nlsstc W may autho- and safe speed limit erected. Any speeds e speed is not reason - a within any munici- af shall be unlawful. ony upon authority ay establish a school upon the basis of an sioner of transporta- vay shall be with the 'd limits shall be in g opening or closing dl not be lower than elow the established ,ed limit is 40 miles prolilWe signs des - :ed speed zone. Any such signs shall be ler their respective highways. section of a street access to the street crossing is located ,orm traffic control o section 169.06 is tits in school zones least a quarter -mile u on which a speed €n engineering and "urban district" as e city or town may stablish on the seg- 2. The speed limit gns designating the ich the speed limit _ = 4461 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 169.14 is established, and any speed in excess of such posted limits shall be unlawful. A copy of the resolution shall be transmitted to the commissioner at least ten days prior to the erection of the signs. Subd: 5c. Speed zoning in alleyways. Local authorities may regulate speed limits for alleyways as defined in section 169.01 based on their own engineering and traffic investigations. Alleyway speed limits established at other than ten miles per hour shall be effective when proper signs are posted. Subd. 5d. Speed zoning in work zones. The commissioner, on trunk highways and temporary trunk highways, and local authorities, on streets and highways under their jurisdiction, may authorize the use of reduced maximum speed limits in highway work zones. The commissioner or local authority is not required to conduct an engineering and traffic investigation before authorizing a reduced speed limit in a highway work zone. The minimum highway work zone speed limit is 20 miles per hour. The work zone speed limit must not reduce the established speed limit on the affected street or highway by more than 15 miles per hour, except that the highway work zone speed limit shall { - not exceed 40 miles per hour. Highway work zone speed limits are effective on erection of appropriate regulatory speed limit signs designating the beginning and end of the affected work zone. The signs must be removed or covered when they are not required. A speed greater than the posted highway work zone speed limit is unlawful. For purposes of this subdivision, "highway work zone" means a segment of high- ; way or street where a road authority or its agent is constructing, reconstructing, or maintaining the physical structure of the roadway, its shoulders, or features adjacent to the roadway, including underground and overhead utilities and highway appurte- nances. Subd. 6. [Repealed, Ex 1971 c 27 s 49] �. Subd. 7. Burden of proof. The provisions of this chapter declaring speed limitation shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any civil action from the burden of prov- ing negligence on the part of the defendant as the proximate cause of an accident. Subd. 8. Minimum speeds. On determining upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a speed at least as great as, or in excess of, a specified and deter- mined minimum is necessary to the reasonable and safe use of any trunk highway or Portion thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs specifying the minimum speed on such highway or portion thereof. The minimum speed shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds less than the posted minimum speeds shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful. Subd. 9. Standards of evidence. In any prosecution in which the rate of speed of a motor vehicle is relevant, evidence of the speed of a motor vehicle as indicated on the speedometer thereof shall be admissible on a showing that a vehicle is regularly used in traffic law enforcement and that the speedometer thereon is regularly and routinely tested for accuracy and a record of the results of said tests kept on file by the agency having control of said vehicle. Evidence as to the speed indicated on said speedometer shall be prima facie evidence that the said vehicle was, at the time said reading was observed, traveling at the rate of speed so indicated; subject to correction by the amount of error, if any, shown to exist by the test made closest in time to the time of said reading. Records of speedometer tests kept in the regular course of operations of any law ti enforcement agency shall be admissible without further foundation, as to the results of said tests. Such records shall be available to the defendant upon demand. Nothing '3 herein shall be construed to preclude or interfere with the cross examination or A''A impeachment of evidence of rate of speed as indicated by speedometer readings, ant to the rules of evidence. Pursu Subd. 10. Radar, speedalyzer devices; standards of evidence. In any prosecution in which the rate of speed of a motor vehicle is relevant, evidence of the speed as indicated on radar or other speedalyzer devices is admissible in evidence, subject to the following conditions. r r x L GS.i _ a 4460 4461 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 169.14 shall be prima facie is established, and any speed in excess of such posted limits shall be unlawful. A copy lawful; except that of the resolution shall be transmitted to the commissioner at least ten days prior to the It and any speed in erection of the signs. t a part of the trunk m speed limit, the Subd. 5c. Speed zoning in alleyways. Local authorities may regulate speed limits appropriate signs for alleyways as defined in section 169.01 based on their own engineering and traffic investigations. Alleyway speed limits established at other than ten miles per hour shall ble and safe speed be effective when proper signs are posted. ion, and that it is within - Subd. 5d. Speed zoning in work zones. The commissioner, on trunk highways and o f s uc ioner of such limit shall temporary trunk highways, and local authorities, on streets and highways under their e to time alter the ,` jurisdiction, may authorize the use of reduced maximum speed limits in highway work zones. The commissioner or local authority is not required to uch zone. conduct an engineering and traffic investigation before authorizing a reduced speed limit in a highway work ve that the existing zone. respective jurisdic- than is reasonable The minimum highway work zone speed limit is 20 miles per hour. The work zone speed limit must not reduce the established speed limit on the affected street or highway oner to authorize, ion of appropriate = by more than 15 miles per hour, except that the highway work zone speed limit shall sioner may autho- not exceed 40 miles per hour. Highway work zone speed limits are effective on erection of appropriate regulatory speed limit signs designating the beginning and end of the d safe speed limit Y affected work zone. The signs must be removed or covered when they are not required. Any speeds A speed greater than the posted highway work zone speed limit is unlawful. g ected. eed is not reason- avlthin any munici- For purposes of this subdivision, "highway work zone" means a segment of high - shall be unlawful. way or street where a road authority or its agent is constructing, reconsteucting, or maintaining the physical structure of the roadway, its shoulders, or features ily upon authority adjacent to the roadway, including underground and overhead utilities and highway appurte- establish a school nances. Subd. 6. [Repealed, Ex 1971 c 27 s 49] !on the basis of an ►ner of transporta- Subd. 7. Burden of proof. The provisions of this chapter declaring speed limitation y shall be with the shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any civil action from the burden of prov- ing negligence on the part of the defendant as the proximate cause of an limits shall os in opening or closing accident. Subd. 8. Minimum speeds. On determining upon the basis of an engineering p g and traffic investigation that a speed at least as in w e lower than w the established great as, or excess of, a specified and deter - mined minimum is necessary to the reasonable and safe use of any trunk highway Y or i limit is 40 miles portion thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs specifying the minimum speed on such highway or portion thereof. The minimum speed shall be effective when such signs ropriate signs des- are erected. Any speeds less than the posted minimum speeds shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful. d speed zone. Any uch signs shall be Subd. 9. Standards of evidence. In any prosecution in which the rate of speed of .r their respective a motor vehicle is relevant, evidence of the speed of a motor vehicle as indicated on iF,hways. ~ the speedometer thereof shall be admissible on a showing that a vehicle is regularly used iection of a street in traffic law enforcement and that the speedometer thereon is regularly and routinely tested for accuracy and a record of the results of said tests kept on file by the agency tccess to the street xossing is located having control of said vehicle. Evidence as to the speed indicated on said speedometer shall be prima facie evidence that the +rm traffic control said vehicle was, at the time said reading was observed, traveling at the rate of speed so indicated; subject to correction by the section 169.06 is amount of error, if any, shown to exist by the test made closest in time to the time of is in school zones said reading. Records of speedometer tests kept in the regular course of operations of any law ast a quarter -mile enforcement agency shall be admissible without further foundation, as to the results of on which a speed said tests. Such records shall be available to the defendant upon demand. Nothing i engineering and herein shall be construed to preclude or interfere with the cross examination or trban district" as impeachment of evidence of rate of speed as indicated by speedometer readings, pursu- city or town may ant to the rules of evidence. ablish on the seg- . The speed -limit Subd. 10. Radar, speedalyzer devices; standards of evidence. In any prosecution in s designating the which the rate of speed of a motor vehicle is relevant, evidence of the speed as indicated h the speed limit T on radar or other speedalyzer devices is admissible in evidence, subject to the following conditions: • • 169.14 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 4462 4463 (a) The officer operating the device has sufficient training to properly operate the _ for safe operas equipment; (b) The officer testifies as to the manner in which the device was set up and oper- unable to mai: and the grade ated; (c) The device was operated with minimal distortion or interference from outside ; History: (_ sources; and 169.16 SPEE (d) The device was tested by an accurate and reliable external mechanism, No person method, or system at the time it was set up. tuting a part e Records of tests made of such devices and kept in the regular course of operations can be mainta of any law enforcement agency are admissible in evidence without further foundation Y posted as prop as to the results of the tests. The records shall be available to a defendant upon demand. The coma Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to preclude or interfere with cross exami- missioner's ov nation or impeachment of evidence of the rate of speed as indicated on the radar or vated structur speedalyzer device. x cannot with sa Histor (2720 - 178) 1937 c 464 s 28, 1939 c 430 s 6, 1947 c 428 s 12,13, c 802 ble under this s 1,2; 1957 c -580 s 1; 1963 c 843 s 1 -4,• 1969 c 623 s 1; 1975 c 53 s 1; 1975 c 363 s 1,2 ; 1976 c 166 s 7, c 60 s 1, 1980 c 498 s 4; 1984 c 417s 24,25, 1986 speed of vehic stating such n c 444; 1987 c 319 sl before each er: ,� Upon the 169.141 FUEL CONSERVATION, HIGHWAY SPEED REDUCTIONS; PEN - • determination j ALTY. signs shall con ! Subdivision 1. The legislature finds that there is a fuel shortage in this state; that tained with sa by reason of the fuel shortage, it may be necessary to reduce highway vehicular speeds History: to conserve fuel; and that it is necessary to provide the executive department of govern- ment with the authority to impose highway vehicular speed restrictions upon a finding 169.17 EME' by the governor that such speed restrictions are necessary ary to conserve fuel. he speed Subd. 2. Upon a finding by the governor, after due consideration of available information and consultation with such federal and - rized emergen shall sound au state officials as the governor deems appropriate, that it is necessary to reduce highway vehicular speeds, the commissioner of transportation, with the approval of the governor, shall, by order, designate = This provision duty to drive the maxi- mum allowable speed of vehicles using the highways of this state. The order shall be 5' tect the driver disregard of tl effective the day following the filing of a certified copy thereof in the office of the secre- tary of state, and shall remain in effect until rescinded by order of the commissioner of transportation. Any speed in History: (_ excess of the designated maximum speed as contained in the order is unlawful, and the penalties provided in section 169.89 apply. 169.18 DRIV Subd. 3. The provisions of section 169.14 and the provisions of any other law Subdivisic authorizing highway vehicular speeds in excess of the maximum speed designated in shall be driver the order of the commissioner of transportation provided for in subdivision 2 are inap - (1) When plicable and of no effect during the period of time in which the order of the commis- '` under the rule: sioner of transportation is in effect. (2) When Subd. 4. The provisions of this section do not apply to authorized emergency vehi- or repair, Iles when responding to emergency calls. (3) Upon History: 1974 c 79 s 1, 1976 c 166 s 7, 1980 c 520 s ];'1986 c 444 applicable the- (4) Upon 169.145 IMPLEMENTS OF HUSBANDRY, SPEED; PENALTY. .- . roadway. No person shall drive a self - propelled implement of husband ry� nor shall any per- g k Subd. 2. i son tow a self - propelled implement of husband husbandry, nor shall any person tow a farm trailer not equipped with brakes each other to of traffic in eac and exceeding 6,000 pounds, at a speed in excess of 30 miles per hour. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. traveled ponic History: 1977 c 397 s 1, 1988 c 636 s 7 - Subd. 3. vehicles proce 169.15 IMPEDING TRAFFIC. special rules h No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slows eed as to im ede or block p P the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except (1) The d direction shall when reduced speed is necessary i Y right side of tt 169.14 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 4462 (a) The officer operating the device has sufficient training to properly operate the equipment; (b) The officer testifies as to the manner in which the device was set up and oper- 'f ated; (c) The device was operated with minimal distortion or interference from outside sources; and (d) The device was tested by an accurate and reliable external mechanism, method, or system at the time it was set up. _ Records of tests made of such devices and kept in the regular course of operations of any law enforcement agency are admissible in evidence without further foundation as to the results of the tests. The records shall be available to a defendant upon demand. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to preclude or interfere with cross exami- nation or impeachment of evidence of the rate of speed as indicated on the radar or -' speedalyzer device. - History: (2720 - 178) 1937 c 464 s 28; 1939 c 430 s 6, 1947 c 428 s 12,13;.1955 c 802 s 1,2; 1957 c 580 s 1; 1963 c 843 s 1 -4; 1969 c 623 s 1; 1975 c 53 s 1; 1975 c 363 s 1,2; , 1976 c 166 s 7; 1979 c 60 s. l; 1980 c 498 s 4, 1984 c 417s 24,25, 1986 c 444, 1987c 319 S1 169.141 FUEL CONSERVATION; HIGHWAY SPEED REDUCTIONS; PEN - ALTY. Subdivision 1. The legislature finds that there is a fuel shortage in this state; that by reason of the fuel shortage, it may be necessary to reduce g � Y ry highway vehicular speeds to conserve fuel; and that it is necessary to provide the executive department of govern- ' ment with the authority to impose highway vehicular speed restrictions upon a finding by the governor that such speed restrictions are necessary to conserve fuel. Subd. 2. Upon a finding by the governor, after due consideration of available information and consultation with such federal and state officials as the governor deems appropriate, that it is necessary to reduce highway vehicular speeds, the commissioner of transportation, with the approval of the governor, shall, by order, designate the maxi- mum allowable speed of vehicles using the highways of this state. The order shall be effective the day following the filing of a certified copy thereof in the office of the secre- tary of state, and shall remain in effect until rescinded by order of the commissioner of transportation. Any speed in excess of the designated maximum speed as contained in the order is unlawful, and the penalties provided in section 169.89 apply. Subd. 3. The provisions of section 169.14 and the provisions of any other law authorizing highway vehicular speeds in excess of the maximum speed designated in the order of the commissioner of transportation provided for in subdivision 2 are inap- plicable and of no effect during the period of time in which the order of the commis - sioner of transportation is in effect. Subd. 4. The provisions of this section do not apply to authorized emergency vehi- cles when responding to emergency calls. History: 1974 c 79 s 1; 1976 c 166 s 7; 1980 c 520 s 1; 1986 c 444 169.145 IMPLEMENTS OF HUSBANDRY, SPEED; PENALTY. No person shall drive a self-propelled im implement of husband P husbandry, nor shall any per- �- son tow a self - propelled implement of husbandry, nor shall any person tow a farm trailer not equipped with brakes and exceeding 6,000 pounds, at a speed in excess of 30 miles per hour. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. History: 1977 c 397 s 1; 1988 c 636 s 7 169.15 IMPEDING TRAFFIC. Y No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary 4463 for safe ope unable to r and the gra Histor. 169.16 SP No per tuting a par can be mai posted as p The co: missioner's vated strut cannot with ble under t speed of ve' stating sucl before each on t de nat si all tained with Histor 169.17 EA The sp rized emery shall sound This provis duty to dri tect the dri disregard o Histor 169.18 DF Subdi- sh� dri WI under the r (2) Wh or repair, . ( OF applicable (4) OF roadway. Subd. each other of traffic in traveled pc Subd. vehicles pr special rule (1) Th direction s right side c 11 TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION * PHASE ONE RECOMMENDATION: 1. OPEN INTERSECTION TO FRONTAGE ROAD ONLY. DO' NOT OPEN OLD MARKET ROAD SOUTH OF FRONTAGE ROAD UNTIL VINEHILL INTERSECTION IS IMPROVED. ?. CONTINUE MONITORING TRAFFIC AT KEY LOCATIONS. 3• CONTINUE WORKING -WITH MINNETONKA REGARDING COMPLETION OF.TOWNLINE AND RESULTING TRAFFIC . IT WILL CREATE ON VINEHILL/COVINGTON /OLD MARKET RD. 4. LEAVE COVINGTON RD. AS A "T" INTO VINEHILL AND AMEND COMP PLAN TO CONFORM WITH THIS RECOMMENDATION. * BENEFITS: 1. ALLOWS ACCESS TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FROM HIGHWAY 7 WHEN OPEN. ?. KEEPS SLIP ON -OFF RAMPS CLOSED. 3. DOES NOT JEOPARDIZE CHILDREN'S SAFETY. 4 . DOES NOT CHANGE CURRENT TRAFFIC PATTERNS. 5. SUSTAINS NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY UNTIL A MORE APPROPRIATE TIME. 6. PROVIDES A WINDOW OF TIME TO DEVELOP PHASE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. PROMOTES A PARTNERSHIP WITH MINNETONKA TO SHELTER NEIGHBORHOODS IN BOTH CITIES FROM EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS PHASE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS: (PHASE TWO OCCURS WHEN OLD MARKET RD OPENS SOUTH OF FRONTAGE RD.) 1. INSTALL STOP SIGNS ON OLD MARKET RD AT WATERFORD PLACE. - - - -' 2. INSTALL "CHILDREN CROSSING SIGNS" ON OLD : `_ MARKET RD AT MUIRFIELD N. & S., WATERFORD PLACE, CHARTWELL HILL AND COVINGTON. 3. REDUCE SPEED ALONG OLD MARKET RD /COVINGTON TO 25 MPH. 4.. ENCOURAGE POLICE TO TICKET VIOLATORS OF SPEED OR STOP SIGNS. 5. INSTALL SIDEWALK ALONG OLD MARKET ROAD. 6. CONSIDER AM/PM TRAFFIC REVERSAL r 7 - 9 A.M.: NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC ONLY 4 - 6 P.M.: SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ONLY BENEFITS: 1. CLEARLY INFORMS MOTORISTS THAT THEY ARE ENTERING A NEIGHBORHOOD, NOT A THRUWAY. 2. SIDEWALK PROVIDES SAFE AREA FOR PEDESTRIANS. 3. AM /PM TRAFFIC REVERSAL REINFORCES THAT OLD MARKET IS A LOCAL CITY STREET, NOT A CONNECTOR BETWEEN CROSSTOWN AND EXCELSIOR. NEW PROPOSED CONTRACT WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT January 1, 1992 - December 31, 1992 IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Munitech, Inc. a Minnesota corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" and, the City of Shorewood, hereinafter called the "City ", as follows: 1. The contractor will furnish the City with the following services: A. To provide Minnesota State certified water and wastewater operators, and the ability to provide services of a certified electronics technician. B. To operate and maintain the water system and the sanitary sewer pumping stations of the City 24 hours per day, 7 days per week (holidays on- call). To advise the City on . an effective sanitary sewer cleaning schedule. C. To daily inspect the operation of the pumping facilities. To quarterly assess performance of the well and pumping efficiency. To insure that all electronic controls and pumping equipment are operating at maximum efficiency. D. To review and comment on proposed additions to the water and sewer systems and to inspect and approve all hookups to the systems. E. To provide water meter readings to the City on a quarterly basis; to inspect, and maintain, water meters, insuring that all revenues due to the City are charged, and that the meters are functioning at maximum efficiency. Recalibrate repair and replace meters which have been identified by the City to be faulty. F. To assess electrical energy requirements to insure that pumping costs are kept as reasonable as possible. G. To provide tools, equipment, vehicles and fuel to carry out the necessary job functions. H. To collect fluoride and bacteriological samples and tests as required by the Minnesota Health Department and to file all appropriate reports with the State. I. To meet regularly with the City Administrator and Director of Public Works to insure continuity of operation. J. To provide contact with the public to handle and resolve problems while coordinating with the City to establish good public relations. NEW K. To inform the Director of Public Works or designated person immediately upon knowledge of an emergency or unusual situation and keep them informed for the duration of that situation. NEW L. To perform operations and maintenance functions at the water treatment facility according to the Operation and Maintenance Manual (O & M) provided by the City. M. To maintain workers compensation insurance, liability insurance, automobile insurance on vehicles etc., health insurance, and employment compensation. The City will have no responsibility for social security, vacation pay, retirement or disability insurance. The contractor shall be deemed in all ways to be an independent contractor. N. To supply labor for minor repairs on all equipment.such as chemical pumps, control systems, sewage pumps and motors. Major repair work including removing well pumps, motors, main electrical service, and major piping changes are to be the responsibility of the City. O. To supply no materials. All materials will be paid for by the City. All equipment rental for major repairs or for expanding the systems, such as excavation equipment shall be paid for by the City. 2. The Contractor shall have the authority to purchase materials and to hire equipment and equipment operators on behalf of the City in an emergency with the permission of the City. 3. The term of the contract shall be from January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992. 4. The City will pay to the contractor the sum of $6,200.00 per month. IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have caused these presents to be executed this day of , 1991. MUNITECH, INC By: Robert D. Polston President By: Stanton K. Anderson Vice President THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD By: By: Barbara J. Brancel Mayor James C. Hurm City Administrator -2- OLD CONTRACT WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Munitech, Inc. a Minnesota corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" and, The City of Shorewood, hereinafter called the "Owner ", as follows: 1. The contractor will provide qualified personnel to furnish the owner with the following services: A. To operate and maintain the water system and the sanitary sewer pumping stations of the owner 24 hours per day, 7 days per week (holidays on call). B. To daily inspect the operation of the pumping facilities. To quarterly assess performance of the well and pumping, efficiency. To insure that all electronic controls and pumping equipment are operating at maximum efficiency. C. To inspect the water system and sewer system and future additions to the system. D. To maintain and recalibrate all water meters to insure that all revenues due to the owner are charged and that the meters are functioning at maximum efficiency. E. To assess electrical energy requirements to insure that pumping costs are kept as reasonable as possible. F. To provide tools, equipment, a vehicle and fuel to carry out the necessary job functions. G. To collect fluoride and bacteriological samples and tests as required by the Minnesota Health Department and to file all appropriate reports with the State. • H. To meet regularly with the City Administrator to insure continuity of operation. I. To provide contact with the public to handle and resolve problems while coordinating with the owner to establish good public relations. 2. The contractor agrees to maintain its own workers' compensa- tion insurance, liability insurance, automobile insurance on vehicles etc., health insurance, and employment compensation. The owner will have no responsibility for social security, vacation pay, retirement or disability insurance. The contractor shall be deemed in all ways to be an independent contractor. -1- ■ 3. The contractor will supply labor for minor repairs on all equipment such.as chemical pumps, control systems, sewage pumps and motors. Major repair work including removing well pumps, motors, main electrical service, and major piping changes are to be the responsibility of the owner. 4. The contractor will supply no materials. All materials will be paid for by the owner. All equipment rental for major repairs or for expanding the systems, such as excavation equipment shall be paid for by the owner. 5. The and the 6. The thr( 7. The per contractor shall have to hire equipment and owner in an emergency term of this contract )ugh December 31, 1991 owner will pay to the month. the authority to purchase materials equipment operators on behalf of with the permission of the owner.. shall be from January 1, 1991 contractor the sum of $5,800.00 IN WITN SS WHEREOF we have caused these presents to be executed this day of 1990. MUNITECH, INC. By 4 Z 14 -1 Robert D. Polston President By Stanton K. Anderson Vice President THE.,CITY OF. $HOREWOOD By, yo augen Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator -2- MUNITECH, INC. 2373 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MOUND, MN 55364.1634 Phone: 6121472.2718 November 4, 1991 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. James Hurm City Administrator Re: Proposal for Sewer and Water Maintenance Services Dear Mr. Hurm, This is our proposal for Sewer and Water Maintenance Services for the City of Shorewood for 1992. We are proposing to provide the services listed on the Request for Proposal, except for Item E, for the sum of ' $6,200.00 per month. Water meter reading is included in this price. If the City wants us to get into each house in the City, and check the inside reading against the outside remote reading and set meters, there will be an additional charge of $800.00 per month. We feel it would be more cost effective for the City to send out cards having home owners read their inside and outside meters once a year. . We have enjoyed working with the City over the past seven years to provide service to the people of Shorewood. We have worked hard to provide the highest quality service at the lowest cost possible. We look forward to continuing this relationship in 1992. Please feel free to call if you have questions or comments. Very truly yours, / d �ftobert Po President Munitech, Inc. RP /j P UTILITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE • SERVICE FOR ALL MAKES OF METERS • SPECIALIST IN FLOW METER REBUILDING MUNITECH, INC. Proposal Cost Analysis For 1992 A. $6,200.00 per month = $74,400.00 per year Will require 3925 hours = $18.95 per hour Hourly rate includes personel, vehicles, insurance, travel B. $7,000.00 per month = $84,000.00 per year Will require 4425 hours = $18.98 per hour Hourly rate includes personel, vehicle, insurance, travel Includes personel going to each house, entering and reading inside meter and outside meter, and resetting remotes if necessary. It is my opinion that sending out cards for homeowners to read their inside and outside meters would be much more cost effective than sending personel to each house. Our proposal includes 200 hours for electronics technician to trouble shoot control panel problems in all wells, and lift stations, and to perform preventive maintenance on control panels. We use these average four hours per week for emergency call -out and preventive maintenance. This service would ,cost the City approximately $50.00 to $60.00 per hour if hired outside the contract. Our proposal includes 300 hours of time for call -outs for emergencies such as watermain breaks, power failures, and normal 24 hour, on -call, 24 hours, 7 days a week. These hours would be billed at time and one -half outside the contract. We ask that you consider the fact that Munitech personel are providing 24 hour per day, 365 days a year, service to the residents of Shorewood. We also ask that you consider that the actual hourly rate has gone up from $18.00 /hour in 1988 to only $18.95 per hour in 1992 lei We feel Munitech, Inc. has done a good job for the Shorewood residents and ask that our contract be renewed for 1992. Our goal remains to provide the highest quality, most cost effective service we can to you and the residents of the City of Shorewood. MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCI L Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty i Daniel Lewis CITY OF - SHOREW ,OOD5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD., MINNESOTA 55331 •`(612) 474 -3236 MEMO _ TO: JAMES HURM ; AL ROLEK DATE -: NOVEMBER 20, 1991 RE: 1992 MUNITECH,PROPOSAL — ANNUAL READING AND MATCHING' ` INSIDE /OUTSIDE METERS 'The proposal received _from Munitech, ; Inc. for water and_ .sewer system maintenance for 1992 basically outlines two options.- -The first is basically for the same services they now provide',-.for which- their 'fee .would be $6,200 per month, a $400 month increase over the 1991 rate. The second includes an additional $800 fee per month for the annual reading and matching of inside and outside meters. This situation comes about--in response to a policy begun by the City in 1990. There were instances where there was a large discrepancy between the reading on the inside meter and the reading j on - the outside meter, resulting in a huge billing to the resident for water consumption. When this problem became apparent, the City Council introduced a_policy wherein all inside and outside water meters would be read and matched annually'. This was to be done by a representative of the City, ie. Munitech., Although Munitech consented to perform this task for the City, it has proven to be substantial, requiring a large expenditure of time after hours on evenings and weekends and many, many return trips to the same residences. This has also been quite unsuccessful, with up to 200 residences yet to be matched due to the unavailability or unwillingness of the property owner. Because of these problems, Munitech , while still willing to .perform this function, finds it necessary to increase the amount of the service agreement for this task. l I still feel that this is an important function which needs to be continued. However, I also feel that_; it, would be more .time efficient for Munitech, and "more cost efficent for the City, for the city staff to send out self reading cards to the residents once ' -- '- year. This is done in several other communities. The A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore j MEMO JAMES HURM READING AND MATCHING OF INSIDE /OUTSIDE METERS NOVEMBER 20, 1991 PAGE 2 residents would fill -in the readings for the inside and outside; meters on their homes and return the cards to the City. Residences which have sizeable discrepancies could then be corrected" by Munitech.. This would save a large amount'of time for Munitech and would also save-the City approximately $700 of the $800 per month fee Munitech would charge for this service.-_ This solution is not without its drawbacks. -- The - return rate for cards is estimated to be somewhere between 40% and 6,0 %. == However, -this percentage may be enhanced through the use of Incentives or_ penalties for residents who do not return the card. It would also need to be understood that the resident would be responsible for reporting the readings-to the City, and would also be responsible for discrepencies between the inside /outside meters which have not - been reported to the City. These details would have to be worked out and a new policy established. - I would recommend, then, that the City handle the annual reading and matching of inside /outside water meters though the mailing of self- reading cards to residents and that the City not contract with- - Munitech for this service. cc: Mayor and Councilmembers _ _ J NOV 21 '91 11 :17 LARKIN HOFFMAN BLMTN. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 403 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF ON -SALE INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR /WINE LICENSES P.2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 . Section 403.03 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: AppLICATION FOR LICENSE: Every application for a license to sell liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, or wine shall state the following: Section 2. . Section 403.05 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: 403.05: CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSES: intoxicating liquor licenses shall be of the following fear {4+five (3) kinds: Subd. 1. ON SALE LICENSES: Which shall be issued only to hotels, clubs, and restaurants and shall permit "an sale' of liquor only. (Ord. 90, 1- 10 -77) Subd. 2. ON SALE INTOXICATING XU T LIQUOR /WINE LICFNSESs Which shall be issued only to restaurants with a seating capacity for not fewer than twenty-five ./ (23) guests and whose gross receipts are at least sixty percent (60%) attributable to the sale of food, meeting the qualifications of Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.404 subd, 3 and shall permit the sale of wine not exceeding fourteen percent (14 %) alcohol by volume, and the sale of intoxicating malt liquor, for consumption on the licensed premises only, in conjunction with the sale of food. intoxicating malt liquor is any malt beverage with an alcohol content of more than three and two - tenths percent (3.2%) of alcohol by weight. Subd. -Z3. ON SALE WINE LICENSES: Which shall be issued only to restaurants with a seating capacity for not fewer than twenty -five (25) guests meeting the qualifications of Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.404, subdivision 5, and shall permit only the sale of wine not exceeding fourteen.pereent (14 %) alcohol by volume, for consumption on the licensed premises only, in conjunction with the sale of food. NOV 21 '91 11:18 LARKIN HOFFMAN BLMTN. Subd. 34 . SPECIAL CLUB LICENSE: only to incorporated clubs which for twenty (20) years or more, o .chartered veterans' organizations P.3 Which shall be issued have been in existence r to congressionally which have been in existence for ten (10) years or more. Subd. S. SPECIAL LICENSE FOR SUNDAY SALES: Authorizing sales on Sunday between the hours of twelve o'clock (12 :00) noon and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight in conjunction with the serving of food may be issued to any hotel, restaurant, or club which has facilities for serving at least thirty (30) guests at one time, and o��:� which has an "on sale" license. (Ord. 90, 1- 10 -77; amd. �' V 1987 Code.) SactLoga Section 403.06, subd. 1 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Fees Established. The annual fees for liquor shall be as follows: On Sale License $7,500.00 � V",v n Sale Intoxicating Salt Liquor /Wine License 2 r 400.00 On Sale wine License 504.00 Special Club License 100.00 Special Sunday License 200.D0 Section 1 . Section 403.07, subd. 1 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Bond, Insurance, or Cash Required: Any person or corporation licensed to sell retail r.-mintoxicating mail liquor at on sale or off sale shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota statutes, section 340A.801 to the Commissioner of public Safety as a condition of the continuance, issuance or renewal of his license. proof of financial responsibility may be given by filing: section s . Section 403.07, subd. 2 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 2. Approval of Security: The security offered under subdivision 1 above shall be approved by the City Council, and in the case of applicants for "on sale wine" or "intoxicating malt liquor /wine° licenses, by the State Liquor Control Director. Surety bonds and liability insurance policies shall be approved as to form by the City Council. (Ord. 90, 1-10-77,• amd- 1987 Code) • 2. NOV 21 '91 11 :18 LAPKIN HOFFMAN BLMTN. Section 6 , Section 403.08 of the Shorewood City Code is hereby amended as follows: P.4 INVESTIGATION OF APPLICANT, ISSUANCE AND TRANSFER OF LICENSE: The City Council shall investigate all facts set out in the application. Opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the license. After the investigation and hearing, the Council shall, in its discretion, grant or refuse the application. No "on sale wine" or "on pale intoxieatinSf malt liquor /wine license shall become effective until it, together with the security furnished by the applicant, has been approved by the Liquor Control Director. Each license shall be issued onl to the applicant and for the premises described in the application. No license may be transferred to another person or place without City Council approval. Any transfer of stock of a corporate license is deemed a transfer of the license and a transfer of stock without prior Council approval is grounds for revocation of the license. (Ord. 90, 1- 1.0 -77) Section -7 . This Ordinance shall be in full force and'effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, this day of , 1991. ATTEST; James C. Hurm City Administrator /Clerk Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor WCG:BE7 3. 0 DRAFT 11/19/91 CITY OF SHOREWOOD POLICY ON PROVIDING SAND /SALT BARRELS FOR PRIVATE ROADS The Shorewood Public Works Department will sell and set up barrels of sand /salt to City residents on private roads. Cost will be $40 which must be paid by the requesting party before set up.' The barrel then becomes the property and responsibility of the requesting party who must store it off public property during the non winter season. Barrels will be refilled upon request and upon payment of a fee of $20. Barrels provided by the property owner which meet Public Works specifications, will be filled upon request and payment of $20.00 Adopted by the Shorewood City Council November 25, 1991 0 JCH.al 11/19/91 JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE EMPLOYMENT OF POLICE CHIEF &POLICE OFFICERS SO AS TO PROVIDE FULL -TIME POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE CITIES OF EXCELSIOR, GREENWOOD, SHOREWOOD NOV -8 1991 AND TONRA BAY COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 1988 The parties to this Agreement are municipalities of the State of Minnesota which have the responsibility for providing for law enforcement within their respective cities so as to enforce the ordinances of these cities and the laws of the State of Minnesota. This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. Section 1 • General Purpose The general purposes of this Agreement are to provide for the employment of a full -time chief of police to act on behalf of the parties to this Agreement, and to provide said person with such assistance in the form of police officers, equipment and supplies as may be necessary so as to provide the parties with law enforcement services in the discharge of the duties imposed upon said municipalities to protect the health and welfare of their citizens and property located within their cities. It is the opinion of the parties to this Agreement that joint action in employing and creating a joint police force to serve the four communities will result in a higher standard of police service, closer control of the police force by the municipalities it serves, and in the long run more efficiency and financial savings to the communities. • Section 2 Definition of Terms For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms in this section shall have the meanings given them. a. "Committee" means the organization created under this Agreement, the full name of which is the "Coordinating Committee for South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety." b. "Committeeman" means a member of the committee. There shall be one committeeman from each governmental unit which is a party to this Agreement, which committeeman shall be the mayor of said governmental unit. An alternate may be appointed to serve when the mayor is unable to attend the meetings of the committee. 13A-I 2 C. "Council" means the governing body of the governmental unit which is a party to this Agreement. d. "Governmental unit" means a city or municipality. e. "Original party" means a governmental unit which elects to become one of the original parties to this Agreement. f. "Later party" means a governmental unit which enters into this Agreement at some time after the Coordinating Committee is originally constituted. g. "Party" means governmental unit which enters into this Agreement. h. "SLMPSD" means the "South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department ", which -shall be the name of the police force created hereunder. i. "Demand" means the number of hours spent by officers while on duty in an individual city, or on matters originating out of an individual city. Hours spent by officers not attributable to any one city shall be apportioned to all of the cities based upon their other demand. All hours shall be recorded and kept by each officer and shall be compiled by the chief of police on a monthly basis to determine the percentage of total police man hours attributable to the various cities. Officer time spent at the police station shall not be charged to the city in which the station is located unless the officer is specifically assigned to cases originating in that city. Section 3 Membership Parties to this Agreement are the City of Excelsior, the City of Greenwood, the City of Shorewood and the City of Tonka Bay. Any other governmental unit adjacent to any one of said cities may become a later party to this Agreement upon consent of the parties to this Agreement. Section 4 Governing Body U Subdivision 1. The committee, consisting of one committeeman from each party, shall be the governing body. Each committeeman shall have an equal voice in the affairs of the committee. 3 Subdivision 2. The person holding the office of mayor of a party to this Agreement shall be a committeemen and serve on the committee as representative of said party; an alternate committeeman S. be appointed by the council of each party from the members offsaid council to serve for a term of one calendar year and represent said party on the committee in the absence of the mayor; the committeeman and alternate shall serve without compensation from the committee. Subdivision 3. A majority of the committeemen shall constitute a quorum at meetings of the committee. - Subdivision 4. A vacancy on the committee shall be filled by the council of the parties whose position on the committee is vacant. No committeeman shall be eligible to vote in behalf.of his party • during the time that such party is in default on any financial payment required to be paid under the terms of the Agreement nor shall the vote of such party be counted for the purposes of determining a quorum. Section 5 Execution of Agreement Meetings, Election of Officers Subdivision 1. Each party shall execute this Agreement through its proper officers by authority conferred by the governing body of the governmental unit. The clerk of such parties shall duly file an executed copy of this Agreement with the clerk of each of the other parties with a certified copy of the Resolution. Subdivision 2. Business of the committee shall be conducted • according to the Roberts Rules of and a Chairman aad seeEetanrry shall be elected. Regular meetings of the committee shall be held once each quarter as follows: The second Wednesday of January, the second Wednesday of April, the second Wednesday of July, and the second Wednesday of October. The purpose of the regular meetings shall be to set budgets and review expenditures. Special meetings shall be at the call of any committeeman; notice of such a meeting shall be sent to the clerk of the parties to this Agreement and shall be mailed at least three days prior to the date of the meeting. Section 6 Powers and Duties of the Committee Subdivision 1. The powers and duties of the committee shall include the powers set forth in this section. 4 Subdivision 2. It shall establish qualifications and duties for the position of chief of police of the parties. Subdivision 3. It shall hire said person to act as chief of police for the parties at such salary and in accordance with such terms and conditions of employment as it shall determine. Subdivision 4. It shall provide office space, equipment and supplies as necessary to accomplish the duties and responsibilities of law enforcement within the boundaries of the parties. Subdivision 5. Upon recommendation of the chief of police, the committee shall approve the employment of such other persons to assist the. chief of police as is required for the purpose of creating a full -time police force to enforce the ordinances and s laws of the State of Minnesota within the boundaries of the parties. Subdivision 6. It shall make a financial accounting and report to the parties at least twice each year. All of its books, reports and records shall be available for and open to examination by the parties at all reasonable times. Subdivision 7. It shall designate a deputy chairman from among the committeemen; it shall designate and appoint a clerk- treasurer to serve the committee who need not be a member of the committee. Subdivision B. It may accumulate reasonable reserve funds, for the purposes as herein provided and it may invest funds of the committee not currently needed for its operations in a manner and subject to the laws of Minnesota applicable to cities. . Subdivision 9. It may collect monies from parties subject to this Agreement. It may recommend changes in this Agreement to the parties which shall be effective; however, only upon agreement of the governing bodies of all parties. Subdivision 10. It shall exercise general supervision over the law enforcement and standards of law enforcement for the parties. Subdivision 11. The committee shall have the authority to approve the recommendations of the chief of police to discipline or terminate employment and authority of any employee, sworn and non- sworn, all subject to and in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 5 Section 7 Financial Matters Subdivision 1. Except as otherwise provided herein, the committee funds may be expended by the committee in accordance with procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by Minnesota cities. Orders, checks and drafts shall be signed by at least two persons, who shall be designated by resolution of the committee, one of whom shall be the clerk - treasurer. Other legal instruments of the committee shall be executed by the ehairman as designated by the committee. During the absence or iifga ty of any of the officers designated to sign checks, drafts and other legal instruments, their alternates may execute the same as authorized by the committee. Subdivision 2. The annual dollar contribution of each of the original parties toward payment of the cost of law enforcement in each of the budget years 1988, - !989, ?990, 1991 and 1992 shall be determined on the basis of a eembinatien of Fe ula and Demand figures as- €ellews s- <� The Demand figures for each year shall be determined by multiplying the approved budget for each year by the percentage of Demand of each of the parties as calculated from the records maintained by the chief of police. Demand will be based on a five year average of the parties wheEe -five yeeEB e€ -data is arvallable. Fer 198$ demand Bhall be based pen 19-8£ datafer 1989, it shall be ba epeZr- 1986 and 1987 data; ete . The maximum annual budget shall be set by each city determining the number of dollars it proposes to pay for police protection. This figure shall be converted to percentage of budget contribution and the lowest total budget so computed shall thereupon be the established budget for the calendar year. If no determination is reached on budget matters by September lst of each year, then the total budget amount shall continue at the previous year's level. N Section 8 Duration Subdivision 1. This Agreement shall take effect January 1, 1988 and shall continue through December 31, 1992 or, thereafter, from year to year. None of the parties shall "withdraw from this eagreement prior to December 31, 39-9 -2 Withdrawals on that date may be accomplished by the party f%T'ing notice with the seedy - treasurer of the committee by August 1 of that year, giving notice of withdrawal as of the end of that year. In such case, financial obligations shall continue until the effective date of withdrawal. Subdivision 2. Cash assets and proceeds from non -cash assets held by the committee at the time of dissolution or withdrawal of any party to this Agreement shall be divided and distributed to the parties in proportion to the contributions made by the parties to the total cost of law enforcement during the period of this Agreement. If the cities can not agree with respect to the value of non -cash assets, two appraisers will be selected by the committee to appraise the non - cash assets. The two appraisers so selected will select a third appraiser. The values as determined by a majority of the appraisers shall be attributed to the non -cash assets in question. Subdivision 3. As an exception to the provision of subdivision 1, in the event the corporate existence of a party is terminated, or a party is consolidated with another municipality not a party to this Agreement, then the obligations of such party hereunder shall cease as of the effective date of such termination or consolidation. If said effective date shall occur at a time other than the end of a budget year, *the withdrawing party's financial obligation for the budget year in progress at the time of said effective date shall be pro -rated for such budget year as of said effective date. The withdrawal of a party under this subdivision shall not automatically terminate this agreement or the obligations of the remaining parties. Following such a withdrawal the percentage of the approved budget payable by each of the remaining parties for each ensuing budget year during the term of the agreement shall be adjusted such that each party's percentage remains in the same proportion to that of the other remaining parties as originally established under Section 7 hereinabove; accordingly, the adjusted percentage for each remaining party shall be calculated by dividing a party's percentage, as hereinabove set forth in Section 7, by the sum of the percentages of all remaining parties. In the event of withdrawal of a party under this subdivision the remaining parties will establish a new budget for the remainder of the year pursuant to the provisions of Section 7, Subd. 2 hereinabove. Section 9 Officers and Employees Subdivision 1. The chief of police employed by the committee shall serve as chief of the parties hereto and he shall have the following duties and be invested with the following authority: 1. He shall be in full and complete charge of all personnel matters and employees of the department including sworn and non - sworn. 2. He shall set and determining degree of service and standards of performance of police officers and non -sworn employees. 3. He shall be in complete charge of all matters relating to law enforcement and to its administration, including assignment of duty and responsibilities to all employees. 4. He shall act for the committee in interviewing and considering applications for employment of all employees, and he shall make his recommendation to the committee of the person who in his judgment is best qualified to fill any employment vacancy. 5. He shall act for the committee in disciplining employees, sworn and non - sworn. 6. He shall be the committee's representative on labor grievance matters, and he shall recommend to the committee all . action which in his opinion is appropriate to be taken to discipline officers or to discharge officers. Such recommendations shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and outstanding contractual agreements governing the same. Subdivision 2. The chief of police shall be responsible for developing from time to time new job description for various positions within the department he deems necessary for the efficient operation of the department. Subdivision 3. It shall be the duty and responsibility of the chief of police to communicate directly with the respective councils of the member cities in the event he deems it necessary to receive direction on any matter arising out of or involving the jurisdiction of any particular council. 0 Subdivision 4. All police officers employed by the committee, including the chief of police, shall enforce and be provided authority to enforce the laws of the parties to this Agreement through proper action of the council of said parties. The committee shall assume all obligations with regard to Werrlefi ry `" Compensation, PERA cf. p , withholding tax, insurance, union negotiations, fringe benefits, Social Security and the like for all employees including the chief of police and all police officers assigned to assist him in the performance of law enforcement duties within the boundaries of the parties hereto. Section 10 Prosecution - Violation of Ordinances and Laws The respective parties to this angreement, shall be responsible for and pay the cost of all prosecutions for violations occurring within their respective boundaries which are subject to prosecution by a party's municipal attorney, including expenses incurred by reason of police officers making their services available for court appearances in such prosecutions. All returns of fines from i ... rr ... s court shall be the sole property of the party in whose jurisdiction the offense occurred. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cities of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay have caused this Agreement to be executed in their behalf by their proper officers duly authorized by resolution of their respective city councils. IN PRESENCE OF: As to City of Excelsior As to City of Greenwood CITY OF EXCELSIOR n By Mayor City Manager Date CITY OF GREENWOOD By Mayor Clerk Date r FJ CITY OF SHOREWOOD As to City of Shorewood By Mayor Clerk Date CITY OF TONRA BAY n LJ As to City of Tonka Bay LJ By Mayor Clerk Date t f l BILLY L. MADDY ' F V October 14, 1991 5780 CHRISTMAS LAKE ROAD 1 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA, 55331 i (61 2) 474 -6968 OCT TO: Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Shorewood's Fall 1991 bulletin invites residents interested in serving on a Senior Housing and Services Task Force to make their interest knowi to the Council. I wish to be considered an applicant. I list the following qualifications and experiences that.may be useful to the Commission. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. I am a resident of Shorewood and a Senior Citizen.- I have had the first hand experience of being a winter resiabnt of '.an; .Arizona retirement community. Have had administration experience as a theatre manager for the R & K Theatres. Duties required hiring and training of staff. Banking and payroll, booking of product, advertising layout and other promotions. Trained as an Army Engineer with experiences in carpentry, structural steel, reinforced concrete fortifications. Eventually assigned to a Heavy Construction engineering bat - tlion operating in the South Pacific. Principal duties were as an administration NCO. I prepared correspondence, orders, reports and personnel duty rosters. Was Chief Artist and a supervisor of art for a Service Engineering department for an Aeronautical and aerospace Division of a worldvido'corporation headquartered in the Twin Cities. In this position I directed the art staff in providing concept illustrations, marketing publications and presentations. Prepared and tracked the departmental budget. Directed and monitored subcontractor support groups. Created concept illustrations of proposed building changes. Experiences provided exposure to such fields 13A -Z (2) LASERS, Solar Energy, audio - visual communications, heat transfer and semiconductor devices, Academic background is: Associate of Arts, Bachelor of Science, and Master of Education. Previously licensed teacher of art and Social Sciences under the State of Minnesota Department of Education. Perhaps there is something in my background that the selection committee would find useful in the Senior Housing Task Force. Very truly yours, I —WO __ a_u P.S. Committees, commissions, and other discussion groups are notor- ious for being stodgy, unwieldy, and cumbersome. Too much of their time and energies are spent in protocol and watcbing_the�.r flanks for fear of over stepping their authority. I have an idea that could chage that. It is called Synergism- October 16, 1991 ICAX LJ Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor City of Shorewood Shorewood MN 55391 Your Honor: Enclosed you will find. my business resume. Having operated in the fields of retail and wholesale purchasing as well as importing, I would like to submit my offer to serve on the Senior Housing and Services Task Force. I believe that my wide experience in dealing with many different business situations can be helpful in this community. If you are in agreement, I would be pleased to hear from you in this regard. Sincerely, Cyrus Zulgad 20505 Radisson Road MN 5539-1 -- 2� • Shorewood, (612) 470 -5181 CYRUS ZULGAD 20505 RADISSON ROAD SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 (612) 470 -5181 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: GIFT MASTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. Co- owner, 1985 -1989 In charge of purchasing gift and gift - related products. Buying Trips: Numerous trips to Korea, Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Argentina, and Brazil. Show presentations annually in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, as well as other minor shows throughout the country. APPLE TRADING COMPANY, INC. Executive Vice- President, 1980 -85. In charge of purchasing and sales of gift and gift- related products. Buying trips: Numerous trips to Korea, Taiwan,• Mainland China, and Hong Kong. Show presentations annually in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, as well as other minor shows throughout the country. RAINBOW MARKETING COMPANY Owner, 1978 -1980 Manufacturer's Representative for numerous gift lines. Showroom in UMAGA (Upper Midwest Allied Gift Association) in Minneapolis. DONALDSONS DEPARTMENT STORE, MINNEAPOLIS (an Allied Store) Divisional Merchandise Manager, 1973 -1978. In charge of Notions, Stationery, Candy, Gourmet, Books, Fabrics, Draperies, Linens, Domestics, Furniture, Toys, and Sporting Goods. STEWART'S DEPARTMENT STORE, BALTIMORE (Associated Dry Goods) Divisional Merchandise Manager, 1971 -1973. In charge of Notions, Stationery, Books, Candy, Gourmet, Fabrics, Linens, and Domestics. J.W.ROBINSON'S DEPARTMENT STORE, LOS ANGELES (an Associated Dry Goods Unit) Buyer, 1965 -1971. Linens and Domestics. Buying Trips: England, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany, France, Holland, and Austria. Assistant Buyer, Housewares, 1963 -1965. HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION Treasurer, 1962 -1963. Working member 1958 -1963. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Bachelors Degree University of California, 1958. NOV 1 4 1991 ;v • • November 13, 1991 City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 To Whom It May Concern: I'm pleased to see that as a result of the original task force on Housing and services for Seniors, an ordinance has been established to pursue the issue further. I currently manage a Senior Rental building in St. Louis Park and feel I have the experience (nineteen years of property management), resources and knowledge of issues that affect Senior Citizens. I would be pleased to be appointed to this task force and thank you for your consideration. Si erely, rv/ Barbara H. Keffe 3663 Park Center Boulevard, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 (612) 926 -2402 Management Office (612) 925 -6231 CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR NOVEMBER 25 1991 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE OCTOBER 25 1991 7847 Void 7848 (G) Commercial Asphalt Street supplies 510.37 7849 (G) MN Cellular Telephone Cellular phone air time 58.71 7850 (G) Bradley Nelsen Zoning institute advance 400.00 7851 (G) Northern States Power Street light utilities 1,784.50 7852 (G) Michael /Pat. Bartlett Recycling award 175.00 7853 (L) Bellboy Corporation Liquor purchases 3,269.78 7854 (L) Griggs, Cooper and Co. Liquor, wine and misc purch. 3,462.72 7855 (L) Johnson Brothers Liquor Liquor and wine purchases 6,363.41 7856 (L) MN Bar Supply Misc and supplies purchases 113.00 7857 (L) Harry Niemela Nov rent for store I 1,564.00 7858 (L) Ed Phillips and Sons Liquor and wine purchases 1,075.53 7859 (L) Pogreba Distributing Beer and misc purchases 894.25 7860 (L) Quality Wine /Spirits Liquor and wine purchases 983.31 * 861 (L) Ryan Properties Nov rent for store II 2,115.00 862 (L) US West Communications Utilities /advertising 241.30 7863 (G) A & K Construction Payment request #3 18,641.28 7864 Void 7865 (G) National City Bank -Mpls Fees and expenses 221.50 7866 (G) First State Bank Payroll deductions 6,193.53 7867 (G) Commissioner of Revenu Payroll deductions 1,027.55 7868 (G) PERA Payroll deductions 1,926.78 7869 (G) ICMA Retirement Trust Payroll deductions 557.50 7870 (G) City Cty Credit Union Payroll deductions 45.00 7871 (G) AFSCME Local #224 Payroll deductions 126.70 7872 (G) Child support Enforce. Payroll deductions 89.10 7873 (G) PERA Council PERA 80.00 7874 (G) PERA Employee add. life ins 42.00 7875 (G) PERA Gagne Pera 30.94 7876 (G) Medcenters Health Plan November health insurance 834.40 7877 (G) Medica Choice November health insurance_ 3,942.00 878 (G) Group Health Inc. November health insurance 642.92 7879 (G) League of MN Cities November dental insurance 422.01 7880 (G) MN Mutual Life November disability insurance 85.50 7881 (G) Commercial Life Ins. November life insurance 50.50 7882 (G) Airsignal, Inc. Beeper services 9.58 7883 (G) American Linen Supply Laundry services 405.75 7884 (G) American Planning Assoc. Zoning news subs. renewal 32.00 7885 (G) Mr. Tony Brausen Return of escrow 421.81 7886 (G) Cargill Salt Division Salt for ice control 1,310.12 7887 (G) Chaska Parts Service Vehicle maint. supplies 392.00 7888 (G) Harold Dircks Council meeting taping 120.00 7889 (G) Dispatch Communications Radio repair 57.80 7890 (G) Electronic Door -Lift Garage door repair 100.00 7891 (G) City of Excelsior Third quarter water 1,632.83 7892 (G) Hennepin Cty Treasurer Prisoner expense -Sept 306.00 7893 (G) ICMA Hurm membership renewal 391.80 7894 (G) Metro Waste Control October SAC charges 1,930.50 -1- CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR NOVEMBER 25 1991 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE OCTOBER 25, 1991 7895 (G) MN Suburban Publications Publishing 60.14 7896 (G) Munitech, Inc. Contract services payment 5,800.00 7897 (G) Bradley Nielsen Section 125 reimbursement 140.00 7898 (G) Northern States Power Utilities 1,177.40 7899 (G) Orr, Schelen, Mayeron September engineering services 40,182.29 and Associates General 5297.56 On -going 268.75 Salt /sand bldg 400.66 Old Mkt Road 32490.88 Treat Plant 871.88 Pine Bend 782.81 Shady Hills 69.75 7900 (G) Joseph Pazandak Mileage and film /processing 53.7 7901 (G) Suburban Tire Co. Loader tire repair 155.5 7902 (G) Superamerica Gasoline purchases 339.94 7903 (G) City of Tonka Bay Third quarter water /sewer 468.90 7904 (G) University of MN Conf registration - Zdrazil 105.00 7905 (G) US West Communications Utilities 170.29 7906 (G) Waste Management Utilities 268.00 7907 (G) A T & T Utilities 33.20 7908 (L) Bellboy Corporation Liquor purchases 3,316.36 7909 (L) Griggs, Cooper and Co. Liquor and wine purchases 4,583.06 7910 (L) Johnson Brothers Liquor Wine purchases 1,696.92 7911 (L) Ed Phillips and Sons Liquor and wine purchases 3,529.15 7912 (L) Quality Wine /Spirits Liquor, wine and misc purch 1,599.02 7913 (L) MN Sales and Use October sales tax 10,807.32 7914 Void 7915 (G) Aspen Publishers Board Member Manuals 120.00 7916 (G) Commercial Asphalt Co. Streets /parks supplies 690.75 7917 (G) Mtka Community Services Lunch mtg- Niccum /Zdrazil 8.5 7918 (G) Northern States Powers Utilities 833.4 7919 (G) Pepsi -Cola Company Pop machine rental 10.00 7920 (G) Minnesota Book Store MN Sessions Laws set 32.00 7921 (L) Bellboy Corporation Liquor purchases 5 2,09.03 7922 (L) Boyd Houser Candy /Tob. Misc and supplies purchases 2,971.37 7923 (L) Midwest Coca -Cola Misc purchases 528.42 7924 (L) Day Distributing Beer and misc purchases 4,892.16 7925 (L) East Side Beverage Co. Beer and misc purchases 7,488.66 7926 (L) Griggs, Cooper and Co. Liquor, wine and misc purch 5,148.38 7927 (L) Johnson Brothers Liquor Wine purchases 2,081.45 7928 (L) Mark VII Distributing Beer and misc purchases 7,169.93 7929 (L) MN Bar Supply Misc and supplies purchases 155.90 7930 (L) North Star Ice Misc purchases 218.16 7931 (L) Pepsi -Cola Company Misc purchases 437.42 7932 (L) Ed Phillips and Sons Liquor and wine purchases 773.73 -2- CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR NOVEMBER 25 1991 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE OCTOBER 25; 1991 7933 (L) Pogreba Distributing Beer and misc purchases 3,977.45 7934 (L) Quality Wine /Spirits Liquor and wine purchases 1,905.98 7935 (L) Thorpe Distributing Co. Beer and misc purchases 16,032.45 7936 (L) Weekly News, Inc. Advertising 499.60 7937 (G) Minnetonka Country Club Appreciation dinner deposit 300.00 7938 (G) John /Linda Geweke Recycling award _ 25.00 7939 (G) David /Marsha Hinze Recycling award 50.00 7940 (G) Petty Cash Petty cash reimbursement 32.09 7941 -7943 Void 7944 (G) PERA Payroll deductions 1,772.05 7945 (G) ICMA Retirement Assoc. Payroll deductions 557.50 7946 (G) City Cty Credit Union Payroll deductions 45.00 947 (G) Child Support Enforce. Payroll deductions 89.10 948 (L) Bellboy Corporation Liquor purchases 4,718.12 7949 (L) Griggs, Cooper and Co. Liquor and wine purchases 2,908.97 7950 (L) Hoops Trucking Liquor and wine purchases 436.80 7951 (L) Johnson Brothers Liquor Wine purchases 3,586.93 7952.(L) MN Bar Supply Supplies purchases 30.80 7953 (L) MN Victoria Oil Utilities 79.17 7954 (L) Ed Phillips and Sons Liquor, wine and beer purch 1,536.57 7955 (L) Quality Wine /Spirits Liquor and wine purchases 2,960.18 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED 216,766.06 -3 TOTAL GENERAL 98,517.80 TOTAL LIQUOR 118,248.26 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED 216,766.06 -3 7960 APPLIED ENGINEERING 7961 ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS 7962 BAUER BUILT TIRE is SERV_ 7963 BROWNlIt"JlG— FERRIS It• 7964 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 7965 CARGILL SALT DIVISION _7966 C1_1A'(`.HA33EN—CIT''r' O�= 1 9 6 7 C: CIt''iT R S C'CIN,D*l F 1 - W AT ER. 7968 Iw; (s: 1 . ;: .!_ I ? 1+5J t.•.1 f f f . ,. , � ('' 7 !._... 7969 DA WAT EQU:I 'tiF:Nt CC) 7970 DEM-' -CON L,- i`'lDFIL.L., 7'97 EOS ,'I FT!C F-I:I'CEC: TUf - ?E 7972 ENGINE ;:PARTS 'SUPPL'`r' CC). 7973 i E - °R:ITi . CONTROLS, INC. TANK REMOVAL PROD SVCS TREATMENT PLATT CERVICES REPAIR LOADER TIRE /WHEEL SATELLI`I"E RENTAL.. STREET SUPPLIES SALT FOR ICE CONTROL OCT ANIMAL CONITROL S'V'C:S WATER COOLER RENTAL C O F f ° E I /',I i.•1 � I'.Y (': (_, .I (`,! L;, f"� I'.:: i' r•1 .I f": .�? U i :l I:.l 7 �y PRO CLE Ai''>l [.rI„1MPIt- -IG CITY GAR PUB WKS PARKS & STREETS SNOW & I PROT INS PUB WKS HIIi'.! 8 LDG WATER DE S I T 1 4A f' -1 U V L .I C W 01-;! I• : 3 'i-' A C S V C y _... ....._ ._ _ ._ 6,272- VEHICLE MAINT SUi= 'PLIES PUB WKS DEMURRAGE CHARGE WATER DE l9 74 I T I tail �.J 4 I.. I ' "1,1, I I 1 I J ''i „i 'I C: �° �, h, i C 1�: r "�. 1 is (; u (� C lr i`' , C: ]: !_ t• . i�. , +:: t -: I 1, —? G � sal � E 4 7975 GLASS t"!ASTERS INC.. C !--I i 0 'A : P (.1 ( °'I L L :I S i' 'i°' O f' W--2 FORMS 7976 GOPHER S ("ATE Oi CALL, IN Oi''4E CALL. 1` ?':?1 '( °i1 =F: T:I ( UTILITY [SILLS WATER DE C HECK4 V E r` D R NIAi` E caESCRIP ['10N DEPT. AMOUNT 7957 ABEL HEATING, INC. HEATER REPAIR PUB WKS 124.02 7958 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO. STREET SUPPLIES STREETS 217.36 7959 ALTERNATIVE STAFFING, INC TEMP OFF=ICE EMPLOYEE GEN GOVT 211.20 7960 APPLIED ENGINEERING 7961 ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS 7962 BAUER BUILT TIRE is SERV_ 7963 BROWNlIt"JlG— FERRIS It• 7964 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 7965 CARGILL SALT DIVISION _7966 C1_1A'(`.HA33EN—CIT''r' O�= 1 9 6 7 C: CIt''iT R S C'CIN,D*l F 1 - W AT ER. 7968 Iw; (s: 1 . ;: .!_ I ? 1+5J t.•.1 f f f . ,. , � ('' 7 !._... 7969 DA WAT EQU:I 'tiF:Nt CC) 7970 DEM-' -CON L,- i`'lDFIL.L., 7'97 EOS ,'I FT!C F-I:I'CEC: TUf - ?E 7972 ENGINE ;:PARTS 'SUPPL'`r' CC). 7973 i E - °R:ITi . CONTROLS, INC. TANK REMOVAL PROD SVCS TREATMENT PLATT CERVICES REPAIR LOADER TIRE /WHEEL SATELLI`I"E RENTAL.. STREET SUPPLIES SALT FOR ICE CONTROL OCT ANIMAL CONITROL S'V'C:S WATER COOLER RENTAL C O F f ° E I /',I i.•1 � I'.Y (': (_, .I (`,! L;, f"� I'.:: i' r•1 .I f": .�? U i :l I:.l 7 �y PRO CLE Ai''>l [.rI„1MPIt- -IG CITY GAR PUB WKS PARKS & STREETS SNOW & I PROT INS PUB WKS HIIi'.! 8 LDG WATER DE S I T 1 4A f' -1 U V L .I C W 01-;! I• : 3 'i-' A C S V C y _... ....._ ._ _ ._ 6,272- VEHICLE MAINT SUi= 'PLIES PUB WKS DEMURRAGE CHARGE WATER DE l9 74 FI Ft_E F UELIt•lG GASOLItlE PU °_:: 7975 GLASS t"!ASTERS INC.. WINDOW GLASS W--2 FORMS 7976 GOPHER S ("ATE Oi CALL, IN Oi''4E CALL. SERVICES UTILITY [SILLS WATER DE ONE CALL SERVICE: UTILITY BILLS ONE CALL. PRI�`lTER TOTAL ONE CALL PRI� : #:t <.:s< TOTAL FOR GOPHER STA i - E ONE - ~C,+L PUS W i +. r M U(`! BLDG 605.56 8,324.45 271.00 42.75 658.57 1,389.010 979.6C) 2.50 !47..C)0 , 37.57 .1 el ,. 01 i ].39.14 50 w 00 254 .25 7 WATER DE 15 . C)o :.EWER DE 15.00 WATER"-? DE 512.5( EWER DID, 512.50 1,055.00 7977 GRIFFCO, INC. SHOP SUPPLIES PUB WKS 67.13 7978 HART FORMS & SYSTEMS W--2 FORMS FINANCE 53.45 UTILITY [SILLS WATER DE 268.95 UTILITY BILLS SEWER DE 268.96 TOTAL FOR HART FORMS & SYSTEMS 591.36 7979 JIM HATCH SALES CO. FLASHER BATTERIES TRAF CON 241:15 7980 HELGESEN, PAUL JANITORIAL SERVICES MUN BLDG----` ''`220:00 "+ I A J.,:' �,.L. I if +'l Cl 1''Y' fii;. 1 !l!r .'.i'.kll�(.?I. l fw:(ICI(,!C, t.h'lJI %,'( i S H!l,.. • S ( IW,�+ r iI� ?lj ! .1. ( I I,I f "IEE ( l.f'lu H `' E HA. D CRIPT10N DEPT. AMOUNIT 7981 KNUT SON SERVICES, INC- RECYCLING SERVICES ________ 4,145.00 7982 LAND —DE —CON FREE REPLACEMENT °-- - -- --- 1,035.00 7983 LARKIN, HOFh-MAN, DAL'Y' & SEPT LEGAL SERVICES- -GEN PROF DER 12,212.71 SEPT LEGAL —CH ROAD 556.20 SEPT LEGAL —SHADY HILLS --- -w-- ----- 63.00 TOTAL FOR LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DAL 12,831_91 7984 LIFE AND SAFETY SAFETY SUPPLIES PUB WKS 6..45 7985 L_YMAN, LUMBER COMPANY MAINT SUPPLIES f ii.JN BLDG 0.54 MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS & 14.40 TOTAL_ FOR LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY 14.94 *9,.,6 ME-FRO WASTE CONTROL COMM,. C0NFRAt`T hDr -i� 1ENT SEWER DE 25,593_0(_) 79,37 f�I() Wc;` I" i3U'3"I NE S3 PR0DUCTS OFFICE ICE SUil")R' `°S f —) GOV T 222.4.1 7988 MILLER' ENf'ERPRI3j • O 1� l.. C r41 1=4,_, A :I R s SNOWPLOW I P II REPA = 'A1'.'T •`i � PUB In1i� S . �.5. 00 798 (V :l r U ;L:ICeA T t Cj i _ .L. �. i" � lS P I .. � , � ,. i�i L_ I :: �� R...1 .�. r "•� f :a G I !- (, . 1 4, 7 f... i " +� i� 4 � ! 15 - ..1. •:, .. 6 '. G, , �) r, 1 T ... r " .,: R _. , i I , ..—s C: LJ I 1 ... (' �; ;,_ •� :I iW i_.' :'�; I I t E R �t R EC R EA TIO N i R .., )� I�i " _ � f i (.:. c ,,. ! -: �' . •� _. 4 79'.)l (' , (_'100 Y 3 I N V L •u, T Ci t,. u _, L h; 'r .., I:.; I:� ;�' R=? C:i F= E ':::� I I;;:I f "� r�'. L .w� R' ? '''rr .1. C i::: ,ti 864. 00 l: ) ', - s', (3 i — E_ - :: >•31,0NAL 3i.:t•tV _.,.. _. L. 4 7 r)rJ PROFESSIOI' `�'L t";Si.It _ _ ._. ,. 224.00 PROFESSIONAL < __ __ _ 640-00 TOTAL FOR MjOODY'S INVESTORS SE 3,200.00 9` I001. MU! LLER chi SONIS, 1f +•0Z' . STRE1" l 3UPPL.1L SI`••LOW & I 8 STREET" SUPPLIES STREETS 843. 36 'TO`I` -''sL C." R. I4'M. f1lii=L1_.E.fi 30NS, 1,6ei .(,:i 7993 P. R. . t !E TRUE IV A L U E M0 1N. I SU '—' L.I i. M BLDG . . 9 9 MAINT ' *,,iwPPLIE3 PU WKS 23..16 f IAIf'•LT SUPPLIES R`'i_i8 wV".3 7.69 I OTC i (° O R. N,A T h'UE V ALUE 102.31 7 "994 NORT 'HE1-N STATES POWER UTILITIES POLICE P 2.91 UTILITIES TRAF CON 9.1.32 UTILIT.IE "5 PARKS & 13. 18 UTILITIES WATER DE 1.0 .82 UTILITIES WATER DE: 863.04 UTILITIES WATER DE 10.27 UTILITIES SEWER DE 66.37 UTILITIES -------- 240.58. ** TOTAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWE 1,391.79 7995 PAZANDAK, JOSEPH FILM /PROCESSING PROT INS 5.09 I � . 'f� I _ �Il + `:�.1 r l tl � �)•• . T � } '• I I I i R r' 6 `•f C 3HLRitWC COL - ICI i_ R E- "I°ORT I -P'P'G L w CH A j. -, P R L! } ; -r �_ :I • T F° C{ I R NOI./Ei 25, 1991 MEE'FIt.-IG J. HEC1 <4 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEPT. AMOUNT MILEAGE PROT INS 33.61 TOTAL FOR PAZANDAK, .JOSEPH 38.70 7996 R & W ROLLOf F SERVICE, IN YARDWASTE DISPOSAL SANIT /'WA 450.00 7997 RESEARCH QUIK WATER SURVEY SERVICES WATER DE 1,155.28 7995 SNYDER, ,KATIE COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES COUNCIL 250.00 P LANNING COMMISS MINUTES PLANNING 150.00 * TOTAL FOR SNYDER, KATIE 400.00 7999 SPRINGSTED FINANCIAL SERVICES - ---- 4,152.87 FINANCIAL SERVICES 7,075.27 FINANCIAL SERVICES -- 3,076.20 FINANCIAL SERVICES ---- -- - --• 1,076.67 +� TOTAL F OR SPRINGSTED 15,381.01 SOOO STERLING COGIF IERS, INC. CODE BOOK CODIFICATIONS G-E: l GOVT 1,930..7.1* x,001 SO LK PUS SAi ~ETY DEP C0h!TRACT PA'r`MEtlT POLICE P 30,675.18 COURT OT AN BOOKI F EE POLICE P 1,619.0s 1 / S I / t^ �,— � „� . A1: 3 ^cat.. ' T G 1° { I_ F °� t. t': ;,, L. L K t I T �. -e ,_ L IJ w ' I� L f � .<_ , .:. � _ ._ w0 " SU' ;I �'r s = +'t ^:i r f;;�J. I T = i}I :.< t:wry _ E -1, fir' 1UB W 3 1' .i•, fir. .1�;. L:: .i._r {. i ". ,^ ..� , ' k' { 2 8 TI RE —C RE DI T P7 Iwo n � i' ..7 T �,u r;. •. =r�u� PUB fa� �::� 1'7 .417 TOT 1A L F OR 3 Ui- Ur�8)1 TIRE C0 I 195.35 S003 TOt!K; "} F0RD 'VEHICLE RE- IR PARTS PUB WKS 21.74 8 VAN DOt' "._N, r"AZA i T' {LLI :),Y,ti :.,ErsVIC"::: 6 05,.00 TOTAL FOR 8t'I't'!K 31 Gff4D TOTAL 1-28,671.78 345,437.84 1 CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR NOVEMBER 25 1991 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR NOVEMBER 5, 1991 PAYROLL 205601 205602 205603 205604 205605 205606 205607 205608 205609 205610 205611 205612 205613 205614 205615 0 05616 05617 205618 205619 205620 205621 205622 205623 205624 205625 205626 205627 205628 205629 205630 205631 05632 05633 205634 205635 205636 205637 205638 205639 205640 (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (G) (L) (G) (L) , (G) (L) (G) (L) (L) (G) (L) (G) (G) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (G) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (G) Void Scott Bartlett Barbara Brancel Robert Daugherty Charles Davis Wendy Davis Kevin Foss Cory Frederick John Fruth Robert Gagne Jerry Harmsen Patricica Helgesen Rachel Huppert James Hurm Brian Jakel Dennis Johnson William Josephson Mark Karsten Anne Latter Susan Latterner Daniel Lewis Joseph Lugowski Robert Lynch Russell Marron Lawrence Niccum Susan Niccum Bradley Nielsen Joseph Pazandak Daniel Randall Brian Roerick Alan Rolek Brian Rosenberger Christopher Schmid Craig Scholle Howard Stark Kristi Stover Beverly Von Feldt Ralph Wehle Dean Young Donald Zdrazil 16 reg hours 88.66 Mayor 187.10 Council 140.32 80 reg hours -15.5 OT 706.82 80 reg hours 641.58 3 reg hours 15.79 43.5 reg hours 212.42 25.75 reg hours 114.82 Council 142.50 8 reg hours 36.94 80 reg hours 769.10 24.75 reg hours 118.80 80 reg hours 1,419.48 58.5 reg hours 266.17 80 reg hours -15 OT 890.86 80 reg hours 600.57 27.5 reg hours 139.67 80 reg hours 703.76 31.25 reg hours 156.19 Council 140.32 80 reg hours -22.5 OT 882.64 6.5 reg hours 34.21 47.5 reg hours 240.21 80 reg hours -16 OT 765.80 80 reg hours 594.96 80 reg hours 866.67 80 reg hours 844.57 80 reg hours -20 OT 963.07 7.5 reg hours 39.48 80 reg hours 957.43 7.5 reg hours 39.48 80 reg hours 523.81 21.5 reg hours 97.53 \ 80 reg hours -14 OT 755.88 Council 142.50 69 reg hours 391.22 80 reg hours -15.5 OT 773.69 80 reg hours 590.93 80 reg hours 1.054.92 TOTAL GENERAL 14,735.19 TOTAL LIQUOR 3.315.68 TOTAL PAYROLL 18.050.87 -7- CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR NOVEMBER 25 1991 COUNCIL MEETING CK NO TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR NOVEMBER 18, 1991 PAYROLL 205641- 205643 Void 205644 (L) Scott Barlett 205645 (G) Charles Davis 205646 (G) Wendy Davis 205647 (L) Kevin Foss 205648 (L) Cory Frederick 205649 (L) John Fruth 205650 (L) Jerry Harmsen 205651 (G) Patricia Helgesen 205652 (L) Rachel Huppert 205653 (G) James Hurm 205654 (L) Brian Jakel 205655 (G) Dennis Johnson 205656 (L) Martin Jones 205657 (L) William Josephson 205658 (L) Mark Karsten 205659 (G) Anne Latter 205660 (L) Susan Latterner 205661 (G) Joseph Lugowski 205662 (L) Robert Lynch 205663 (L) Russell Marron 205564 (G) Lawrence Niccum 205565 (G) Susan Niccum 205666 (G) Bradley Nielsen 205667 (G) Joseph Pazandak 205568 (G) Daniel Randall 205669 (L) Brian Roerick 205670 (G) Alan Rolek 205671 (L) Brian Rosenberger 205672 (L) Christopher Schmid 205673 (L) Craig Scholle 205674 (G) Howard Stark 205675 (G) Beverly Von Feldt 205676 (G) Ralph Wehle 205677 (L) Dean Young 205678 (G) Donald Zdrazil 205679 (G) James Hurm 36 reg hours 181.59 80 reg hours -1.5 OT 553.00 80 reg hours 641.57 7.5 reg hours 39.48 27 reg hours 134.65 7.75 reg hours 40.80 11 reg hours 54.86 80 reg hours 769.10 7.5 reg hours 34.63 80 reg hours 1,286.12 56.5 reg hours 258.01 80 reg hours -2 OT 720.47 16 reg hours 79.79 80 reg hours 600.57 24.25 reg hours 126.41 80 reg hours 703.75 37.5 reg hours 181.69 80 reg hours -7 OT 782.48 6.5 reg hours 34.21 27 reg hours 142.44 80 reg hours -2 OT 651.78 80 reg hours 594.95 80 reg hours 866.67 80 reg hours 844.57 80 reg hours 767.40 3.5 reg hours 18.42 80 reg hours 957.42 14 reg hours 73.69 80 reg hours 523.81 4 reg hours 21.06 80 reg hours 584.37 80 reg hours 450.97 80 reg hours 583.83 80 reg hours 590.93 80 reg hours 1,054.92 Balance due on prev ck 133.36 TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR TOTAL PAYROLL -8- 12,946.75 3,137.04 16,083.77 ' MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL Kristi Stover ' Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis - CITY OF Aft Aftill SHOREWOOD t 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 -3236 / CITY OF SHOREWOOD 1992 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND, WATER FUND, SEWER FUND AND RECYCLING'FUND BUDGETS A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore I CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROPOSED 1992 GENERAL OPERATING, ' WATER, SEWER AND RECYCLING BUDGETS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary of 1992 General Operating Budget 1 ' Preparation Calendar for 1992 Budget 3 ' Organizational Chart 4 General Operating Fund Revenues Adopted Revenues Chart 5 Summary of Adopted 1992 Revenues 6 -7 Expenditures Adopted Expenditures Chart 8 Summary of Adopted 1992 Expenditures 9 Departmental Budgets t 51 - Mayor and Council 10 -11 52 - Administrator 12 -13 ' 53 - General Government 14 -15 ' 54 - Finance 16 -17 55 - Professional Services 18 -19 56 - Planning and Zoning 20 -21 57 - Municipal Building - City Hall 22 - 23 ' 58 - Police 24 -25 59 - Fire Protection 26 -27 60 - Protective Inspection 28-29 ' 61 - City Engineer 30 -31 62 - Public Works Service 32 -33 ' -35 63 - Streets and Roadways 34 ' 64 - Snow and Ice Removal 36 -37 65 - Traffic Control /Street Lighting 38 -39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 PAGE 40 -41 42 -43 44 -45 46 -47 48 -49 50 -51 52 -55 56 -57 58 -59 60 -61 Departmental Budgets (cont.) 67 - Sanitation /Waste Removal /Weeds 68 - Tree Maintenance 69 - Parks and Recreation 70 - Capital Improvement 71'- Contingency Water Fund Adopted 1992 Revenues Adopted 1992 Expenses Sewer Fund Adopted 1992 Revenues Adopted 1992 Expenses Recycling Fund Adopted 1992 Revenues and Expenses I T CITY OF SHOREWOOD SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1992 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET, REVENUE SUMMARY ADOPTED PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET - - - - -- - 1991 - 1992 AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX 1,840,663 1,840,663 LICENCES AND PERMITS 172,500 128,525 ' INTERGOVERNMENTAL 62,840 18,750 FINES AND FORFEITURES 90,000 95,000 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 20,000 9,500 TRANSFERS AND MISCELLANEOUS 100,000 288,753 TOTAL BUDGETED REVENUES 2,286,003 2,381,191 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ADOPTED PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET 1991 - - - - -- -- 1992 -------- MAYOR AND COUNCIL 95,121 48,698 ADMINISTRATOR 66,189 92,808 GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 85,826 76,701 FINANCE 74,366 74,867 ' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,292 104,780 PLANNING AND ZONING 66,995 67 MUNICIPAL BUILDING (CITY HALL) 109,400 143,200 POLICE 382,152 392,336 FIRE PROTECTION 88,527 95,398 PROTECTIVE INSPECTION 83,086 93,731 CITY ENGINEER 0 75,633 PUBLIC WORKS 157,254 151,473 CAPITAL OUTLAY STREETS AND ROADWAYS 76,000 139,662 0 147,242 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 200,000 312,000 SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL 33,623 34,716 TRAFFIC CONTROL /STREET LIGHTING 34,500 34,000 SANITATION /WASTE REMOVAL /WEEDS 97,551 14,610 TREE MAINTENANCE 22,198 25,090 PARKS AND RECREATION /BEACHES 118,649 136,784 CAPITAL OUTLAY 24,500 14,750 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 163,112 .165,000 CONTINGENCY - - - -- 50,000 ----- 80,118 - TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 2,286,003 2,381,191 I i I - i ' CITY OF SHOREWOOD 1992 BUDGET PREPARATION CALENDAR JUNE 27, 1991 Budget worksheets distributed to Department Heads and Administrator JUNE 27 - JULY 19, 1991 Departmental budgets are prepared JULY 19 -26, 1991 Departmental budgets are reviewed with Administrator and Finance Director JULY 26 - AUGUST 2, 1991 Departmental budgets are revised and budget is assembled for Council workshop(s) AUGUST 1, 1991 Dept. of Revenue advises City of 1992 Local Government Aid and Levy Limit amounts AUGUST 2, 1991 Council and Financial Advisory Board receive proposed 1992 budget AUGUST 19, 1991 Workshop with Council and Financial Advisory Board to review proposed 1992 budget County informs City of county and- school board(s) public hearing dates AUGUST 26, 1991 City Council approves preliminary 1992 Tax Levy and Budget and sets initial and continuation public hearing dates SEPTEMBER 1, 1991 Preliminary 1992 Tax Levy and Budget certified to County Auditor Inform County of initial and continuation public hearing dates ON OR BEFORE County mails notice of proposed property tax NOVEMBER 10, 1991 increase to all property owners TWO TO SIX DAYS City publishes newspaper ad of public hearing BEFORE PUBLIC dates and 1992 Proposed Tax Levy HEARING DATE NOVEMBER 25, 1991 Council holds public hearing and adopts final 1992 Tax Levy and Budget ON OR BEFORE City certifies final 1992 Tax Levy and Budget DECEMBER 30, 1991 to County Auditor City certifies compliance with Truth in Taxation requirements to Dept. of Revenue -3- C LU r w F- z tj O Z LLI .I r t1 }. Z }- C V t- F- N O } C Z Z Y Z N !J7 to R c.1 J C- d ' C O O U u N C 3 3: t- •. r Y G O Z ►- C3 � U J C U V LLI C� • J J r a3: c t0 Q N LL Z O r Q t--- U C C C � Y C LLI tD cm r � J U cn C p Z C U C C t= t N O Q LLI V = to C7 LLl F- ` i o.. < =tnu C L;' • • C V Ln > (n LLI LU N �� Cn J Lu H = C; �uLLt - -zz cnuc3� C i I t I 1 I i L.1 1 1 1 1 11 1 F•-- I I I 1 1 J G Ct I 1 1 I I Z CL. 1 I 1 L7 to 0 2 LU I y.1F -JJ V I N C LU r w F- z tj O Z LLI .I r t1 }. Z }- C V t- F- N r�7 Z Z Y Y to R c.1 J C- d ' C O O U u N Z 3 3: t- •. r Y tJ O V U J C U V LLI C� • J J r a3: G t0 Q W � Z C— Q tD cm CJ Z O t= t !- ti u uJ z � ►-+ Ln C C Z N I LU �- Z C g Y LU Cu C C 1--v1 N C C LLI to Y cn C v « G 6 I N C Z Z C t= ... c7 Z O R c.1 J C- d ' O n 92 Z Z V to tJ O V 6 I N C Z Z `f' t= ... z JN - Z Z V to 6 I N C C < L•1 C LLI C t= ... Z Z V to tJ O V • L:.1 < -4- .•uLUrJ�� J C to V •• ••• t t O Ll Z Z V to tJ O V C < C F- -4- .•uLUrJ�� J C to V •• ••• t t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V) W m Z o W o � o LLB W i W o 0 m N LL. 0 o Q1 in }' W F U o tr d Lti w H ' cc W CL W En Z U Z J W 2 m Li! O LAI C9 Z Z N v V (n W W M A A v X a C tJ9 t7 V W W N -5- II BUDGET COMMENTS: GENERAL OPERATING FUND REVENUES TAXES: The City taxes its residents to finance the general o erating fund as provided by the State of MN under levy limitation. Special Levy is for debt service on equipment purchases. LICENSE /PERMIT FEES: Rental Housing License Fees Liquor licenses Other Business Lic. - Fees for licenses & permits to business establishments State Surcharge Collections Building Permits - based upon valuation of structure Well Permits - Distributed by the State of MN as of 1/1/90 Dog Licenses Other Nructure. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID The Omnibus Tax Law of 1971 established Local Government Aid. The Omnibus Tax Law of 1989 shifts this aid to School Districts. The City's entire allotment of LGA was shifted to the School Districts for 1990 HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURE CREDIT AID - A portion of the Tax Levy shown above FISCAL DISPARITIES - Received with taxes above. In 1971, the legislature enacted this law to allow municipalities to share in metro olitan commercial industrial growth. A percentage o commercial/industrial taxes are pooled and distributed to communities with little or no commercial /industrial tax base. MSA ROAD AID (Became eligible for this aid as of 1/1/90) Aid provided to cities over 5000 pop. to maintain designated MSA roads COUNTY RECYCLING AID - reimbursement for recycling expenses - moved to Fund # 62 METRO COUNCIL PLANNING,GRANT - for updating of land use maps, etc. GENERAL GOVERNMENT The City provides services to the public for which a charge is collected such as assessment services, map sales, planning fees, etc. SANITATION - Dump fees and charges for spring clean -up - moved to Fund # 62 FINES & FORFEITS - Fines imposed for traffic & ordinance violations. MISC. REVENUES - Revenue from a variety of sources such as interest income, payments on house, pop sales, etc. TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS - Tranfers from Sewer, Water & Capital Projects Funds for service provided by City Engineer LIQUOR STORE TRANSFER - Revenue from liquor stores based on previous year profits. Building & Grounds Improvement Funds from 1989 -90 BUDGETED RESERVES - 1991 Street Improvement funds carried forward to 1992 -6- 0 1 C 1. t t SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUES 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET REVENUES: Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 TAXES: --------------------------- Total ------------------------------------------------------------------ 18,202 49,977 49,840 0 General Property 1,055,338 1,375,863 1,840,663 650,000 1,840,663 1,840,663 10,000 Fiscal Disparities 63,547 61,277 Sanitation 3,131 6,089 Special Levy --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recreation Total Taxes 1,118,885 1,437,140 1,840,663 650,000 1,840,663 1,840,663 0 LICENSE \PERMIT FEES: 11,954 9,943 20,000 0 10,000 9,500 Rental Housing FINES & FORFEITS 3,500 124,234 90,000 40,795 90,000 Surcharge Rebate 11,993 ------------ ------------------------------------------------- Total 105,244 124,234 90,000 40,795 Alcoholic Beverage 8,187 8,175 8,200 8,175 8,175 8,675 124,069 Others - Business 288 631 500 495 500 1,350 100,736 State Surcharge 10,154 10,787 8,000 5,579 8,000 6,000 TRANSFERS Building Permits 183,309 181,762 150,000 97,664 150,000 110,000 Well Permits 2,478 175,000 29,753 Dog Licenses 2,038 1,651 1,800 1,169 1,800 2,000 35,000 Others -Misc. 675 822 500 -- 195,000 500 500 - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 219,122 203,828 172,500 113,082 168,975 128,525 -- 0 INTER - GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 FEDERAL AIDS 0 155,000 0 TOTAL REVENUES 1,944,628 2,367,994 CDBG Grant 12,182 STATE AIDS Local Gov't Aid 163,313 Homestead Tax Aid 171,665 209,928 Misc. MSA Road Aid 13,875 13,000 6,877 13,850 13,750 Total 334,978 223,803 13,000 6,877 13,850 13,750 0 COUNTY /METRO AIDS County Recycling 18,202 49,977 49,840 Metro Plan Grant 5,000 --------------------------- Total ------------------------------------------------------------------ 18,202 49,977 49,840 0 5,000 0 CHARGES FOR SERVICE General Government 8,823 2,745 10,000 10,000 9,500 Sanitation 3,131 6,089 10,000 Recreation 1,109 Total 11,954 9,943 20,000 0 10,000 9,500 0 FINES & FORFEITS 105,244 124,234 90,000 40,795 90,000 95,000 ------------ ------------------------------------------------- Total 105,244 124,234 90,000 40,795 -� - - -- 90,000 ------ ----------- 95,000 0 MISC REVENUES 100,736 124,069 75,000 10,043 75,000 69,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 100,736 124,069 75,000 10,043 75,000 69,000 0 TRANSFERS From Other Funds 175,000 29,753 From Liquor Stores 23,325 20,000 25,000 25,000 35,000 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total 23,325 -- 195,000 25,000 0 - - - - 25,000 -- - - - - 64,753 - -- 0 BUDGETED RESERVES 155,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 155,000 0 TOTAL REVENUES 1,944,628 2,367,994 2,286,003 820,797 2,223,488, 2,381,191 0 -7- W [C H 0 0 W 0 a x W L61 in W W W U [G 0 N C1 ` r rn r E... o W V O CL w CL r iCI Y CL ZR Ln V Z Sri a � N v Z H Z _j U 4 Q Z W in to r 41 CL U O Q� W it v LL. M 4W. N N r U J CL U a O L 0 Lai U W � _ m °- o j a m H W CL CL a U W � f- N I CITY OF SHOREWOOD SUMMARY OF DISBURSEMENTS 1992 PROPOSED BUDGET GENERAL OPERATING FUND Fund 60 Special Levy for Water Fund 1 [1 t Total Budgeted Expense 16,325 2,302,328 Proposed Bu 19 48,698 92,808 76,701 74,867 104,780 67,256 143,200 392,336 95,398 93,731 75,633 151,473 0 147,242 312,000 34,716 34,000 14,610 25,090 136,784 14,750 165,000 80,118 2,381,191 15,500 2,396,691 FUND # 10 Adopted Budget Dept - - - - # Department - -- ------------------ ------ 1991 - - - - -- 51 Mayor and Council 95,121 1 52 Administrator 66,189 53 General Gov't Services 85,826 54 Finance 74,366 55 Professional Services 117,292 56 Planning & Zoning 66,995 57 Municipal Bldg. (City Hall) 109,400 58 Police 382,152 59 Fire 88,527 60 Protective Inspection 83,086 61 62 City Engineer 0 Public Works Service 157,254 Capital outlay 76,000 63 Streets & Roadways 139,662 Street Improvements 200,000 64 Snow & Ice Removal 33,623 65 Traffic Control /Street Lighting 34,500 67 Sanitation /Waste Removal /Weeds 97,551 68 Tree Maintenance 22,198 69 Parks & Recreation /Beaches 118,649 1 Capital Outlay 24,500 70 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 163,112 71 CONTINGENCY 50,000 Total General Fund Operating Expenditures 2,286,003 Fund 60 Special Levy for Water Fund 1 [1 t Total Budgeted Expense 16,325 2,302,328 Proposed Bu 19 48,698 92,808 76,701 74,867 104,780 67,256 143,200 392,336 95,398 93,731 75,633 151,473 0 147,242 312,000 34,716 34,000 14,610 25,090 136,784 14,750 165,000 80,118 2,381,191 15,500 2,396,691 I BUDGET COMMENTS: MAYOR AND COUNCIL DEPT # 51 Code # 03 Council Salaries 07 City Contribution to PERA Defined Contribution Plan 09 City's portion of Medicare tax 26 Awards and misc. supplies 35 Cable Television Operator /Council Meetings - $60 /mtg. Recording Secretary ($100 x 3 x 12 mos.) 3,600 Christmas Lake Mil oil Insp (2) 1,400 37 Travel, Conferences, Schools 1,000 Volunteer Dinner for City Volunteers 1,500 38 Newsletters (Quarterly) & Notices 53 Subscriptions & Memberships Lake Mtka Consv. Dist. LMCD Assn of Metro Municipalities League of MN Cities Misc. Subscriptions MN Women Elected Officials West Henn. Human Services Henn. Co. Fair Fireworks MN Mayors Association Board & Administrator Magazine 63 Desktop Publishing Software for Newsletter 16,937 1,624 3,540 50 75 1,302 50 1,000 10 200 OUZ I FUND: #10 ACTIVITY:Mayor and Council DEPT # 51 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adoppted 1990 1991 1991 Est -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 02 O.T. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 9,700 9,600 12,600 4,800 9,600 9,600 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 516 630 76 300 480 08 Ins. City.Share 09 10 Medicare City Share 54 52 113 44 90 90 Other Withhold. Total 9,754 10,168 13,343 4,920 9,990 10,170 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools - 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies 315 368 300 1,332 1,400 400 -- - -------------------------- 7--------------------------------------------------------- Total 315 368 300 1,332 1,400 400 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 2,798 9,634 6,840 6,412 6,500 6,440 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 703 1,148 2,500 353 2,500 2,500 38 Print Publish 2,963 2,903 3,500 2,125 3,500 3,800 39 Utili ies- Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 42,078 100 33,000 Total 6,464 --------------------------------------------- 13,685 54,918 8,990 45,500 12,740 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 24,137 20,274 23,560 17,626 23,560 24,788 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan , 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 24,137 20,274 23,560 17,626 23,560 24,788 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land. 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 3,000 600 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures Total 0 0 ------------------------------------------ 3,000 0 0 600 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 -------------------- 0 0 0 - TOTAL ACCOUNT 40,670 44,495 95,121 32,868 80,450 48,698 0 -11- I BUDGET COMMENTS: ADMINISTRATOR DEPT # 52 Code # 01 100% Administrator's Salary 25% Sec. /Receptionist 50% Exec. Sec. /Dep. Clerk 23 Computer contracts 455 Typewriter 69 26 Books & Misc Supplies - incl. set of State Statutes 35 Labor Relations Associates 37 MCMA, LMC, & MPELRA Conferences Mileage Educa 53 Subscriptions & Memberships ICMA MCMA MAMA MPELRA 65 Conference table Side chairs (4) Desk Chair 2,800 1,750 500 1,000 450 40 15 100 400 700 400 -12- �I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY:Administrator DEPT # 52 Code # ITEM ------------ Actual Actual Bud get Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted - - - - -- - 1989 1990 1991 - - - -- - 1991 EST -91 1992 992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 38,559 47,926 48,304 28,741 57,000 68,800 02 O.T. Salaries 95 03 Part Time Salaries 05 MN Unemp Comp 1560 06 FICA City Share 2,895 3,526 3,864 2,153 4,361 5,263 07 PERA City Share 427 212 2,164 330 2,554 3,082 08 Ins. City Share 3,916 4,412 5,442 1,800 5,442 6,734 09 Medicare City_Share 7 10 Other Total 45,797 56,083 --------------------------------------------- 59,774 34,679 69,357 83,879 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 26 21 Motor Fuel & Lube i 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equip Maint - Buildings 285 985 985 985 524 26 General Supplies 116 115 250 --------------------------------------------- 165 250 250 0 Total 116 426 1,235 1,150 1,235 774 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal ' 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Plannin ?ual 35 Contrac 14,109 1898 1,400 2,100 2,100 2,800 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 1,616 2794 3,250 109 2,000 3,250 38 Print Publish 39 Utili ies- Gas./Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misc. Services Total 15,725 4,692 4,650 2,209 4,100 6,050 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 351 575 530 100 555 605 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - 1 Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 351 575 530 100 555 605 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn &,Fixtures 712 1,470 1,500 Total 712 1,470 0 0 0 1,500 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0000000_ TOTAL ACCOUNT 62,701 63,246 66,189 38,138 75,247 92,808 0 -13- I 50 120 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 BUDGET COMMENTS: GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES DEPT # 53 Code # O1 50% Deputy Clerks Salary 25% Asst. Clerks Salary 75% Sec /Receptionist 03 Part -time (600 hrs x $7.00 /hr) 4,200 Intern (520 hrs x $6.00 /hr) 3,120 Election Judges 5,760 (3 elect x 5 Jdgs x 16 hrs x $6.00 /hr) 20 Office supplies, postage, Computer paper & copier supplies. 23 Computer contracts 620 Election equippment 1,470 (3 machines @ $490 /ea - 2 yr contract) Typewriter 55 26 General Supplies 35 Microfilming services Duplicate Tapes 37 Travel, Conferences & Schools: State Clerks Conf. - Anne 300 Misc. Seminars, Mileage & MCFOA Mtgs 1,550 38 Legal Notices - All Gen'l Fund Depts except Capital Projects 43 Election Cost- Materials 53 MCFOA Dues - Anne & Sue Intl Inst. Nat'l - MN Clerk Assn. -14- I FUND: Land 61 Buildings #10 General ACTIVITY:General 62 Government Services Dept #53 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 65 Furn & Fixtures 1,615 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 Total 1,615 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 1,200 0 0 TRANSFERS 01 Regular Salaries 50,750 56,668 54,711 15,991 40,000 32,220 02 O.T. Salaries 72 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 13,100 Total TOTAL ACCOUNT 03 Part Time Salaries 3,173 4,161 05 MN Unemp Comp 1 612 7,200 06 FICA City Share 3,773 4,019 4,377 1,193 3,06 3,467 07 PERA City Share 2,197 2,430 2,451 508 1,792 1,443 1 08 Ins. City Share 5,088 5,222 6,212 1,247 4,000 3,156 09 Medicare City Share 53 ill 10 ----------------------------- Other 28,200 28,200 Total 65,034 72,628 67,751 48,751 84,252 53,386 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 8,364 11,006 10,000 7,386 11,000 11,000 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 1 22 Small Tools 23 Maint Equipment 68 651 525 179 525 2,145 24 Maint - Buildings 26 ----------------------------'--------'--------'------------------------'------------- General Supplies Total 75 163 150 150 150 8,507 11,820 10,675 7,565 11,675 13,295 0 OTHER SERVICES ' 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 Contractual 3,439 3,451 1,500 2,155 4,000 4,500 36 Communication 43 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 1,625 576 1,850 568 1,850 1,850 38 Print Publish 1,381 3,701 2,500 2,542 3,000 3,000 ' 39 Utilities - Gas./Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 ----------------------------- Misc. Services 56 - 500-----_ Total - - - 6,544 -- ----- 8,136 ----- 6,050 ----------------- 5,265 - 8,850 - - - -- 9,850 - - -- 0 u 1 t OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 140 150 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense from other Depts Total 140 150 150 186 186 170 ------------------------------- 150 186 186 170 CAPITAL OUTLAY -15- 60 Land 61 Buildings ' 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 1,200 1,200 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures 1,615 Total 1,615 0 1,200 0 1,200 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 81,840 0 0 92,734 85 826 0 0 ------- - - - -- 0 7 61,767 106,163 76,701 0 -15- I BUDGET COMMENTS: FINANCE DEPT # 54 Code # 01 100% Finance Director 70% Senior Accounting Clerk 20 Computer Supplies, Paper, Checks, Budget Supplies, Disks, Ribbons, etc. 23 Computer contracts 1,591 Typewriter 69 26 Books & Publications 32 Audit - moved to Dept. 55, line 32 37 Travel, Conferences & Schools: GFOA Local 250 GFOA State 300 Mileage 500 Educa 1,000 Nat'l. GFOA Conference 1,000 38 Publish financial statements and budget 45 Broker fees for investments 50 Rental Deposit Box - larger 1Ox10x22 size 53 GFOA - State and National 115 Public Investor 135 Submittal fee - GFOA Cert. of Excellence 300 -16- �I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Finance DEPT # 54 Code Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted - ITEM ------------ - - - - -- - 1989 1990 1991 - - - - -- - 1991 EST -91 1992 199 2 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 42,634 49,723 50,043 23,096 52,000 53,662 02 O.T. Salaries 168 1,000 500 500 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 3,211 3,537 4,083 1,667 3,978 4,143 07 PERA City Share 1,871 2,143 2,287 1,034 2,330 2,426 08 Ins. City Share 4,182 4,554 6,028 2,402 6,028 5,251 09 Medicare City Share 29 10 Other Withhold. -------------------- - - - - Total -- ----------------------------------------------------------- 52,066 59,986 63,441 28,199 64,836 65,982 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Suppplies 1,532 1,296 1,700 617 1,700 1,700 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 1 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 158 637 1,800 1,339 1,800 1,660 26 General Supplies 45 16 100 70 100 100 ' --------------------------------------- Total 1,735 1,949 3,600 ------------------------------------- 2,026 3,600 3,460 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 2,859 3,030 1,500 655 655 32 Audit 3,845 4,549 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 Contractual 2,986 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 1,597 .1,745 3,800 886 2,000 3 38 Print /Publish 481 381 750 89 750 1,200 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 1 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 3 3 3 45 --------------------------------- Investment Svc. Chg Total 346 - 12,114 - - -- 391 - - - -- - 500 - 168 --- - - - - -- 1,801 ----- 500 --- 3,908 __ - 500 - 4,750 --- - - - - -- 0 10,099 6,550 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 30 85 75 150 125 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 115 95 200 120 250 550 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts 1 Total 145 180 275 120 400 675 0 C APITAL TAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 500 299 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures 282 Total 282 0 500 299 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent ' 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0000000_ 1 r======= TOTAL ACCOUNT 66,342 72,214 74,366 32,445 72,744 74,867 0 -17- I BUDGET COMMENTS: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT # 55 Code # 20 Assessor Supplies 30 Legal: Monthly Retainer $400 x 12 = 4,800 Prosecutions 20,000 Gen legal 37,000 Litigation (incl. in Genl Legal) 32 Audit - General ($8,100 x 60 %) & $1,500 Cert. of Achievement 33 Engineering - moved to City Engineer Budget - Dept. 61 35 Assessor -18- t I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Professional Services DEPT # 55 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Re ular Salaries 0. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share ' 09 10 Medicare City Share --- -------------- Other Withhold. --------- ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 451 667 600 800 900 800 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools - ' 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies Total 451 667 600 800 900 800 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 58,580 46,254 55,000 29,432 58,000 61,800 31 Financial ' 32 Audit 4,700 4,629 4,629 6,180 33 Engineering 37,991 61,068 25,000 8,093 25,000 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£- Assessor 26,399 30,597 31,992 15,996 32,000 36,000 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 39 Utili ies- Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements ' 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 122,970 137,919 116,692 58,150 119,629 103,980 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense , from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings ' 62 63 Machinery -Equip Other Improve 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL ACCOUNT 123,421 138,586 117,292 58,950 120,529 104,780 0 I -19- II 75 30 25 25 50 BUDGET COMMENTS: PLANNING & ZONING DEPT # 56 Code # O1 85% of salary cost for Planning Director 50% Planning Assistant 23 Computer contracts 1,435 Typewriter 55 26 General Supplies: Books 100 Graphics materials 200 35 Recording Secretary - Planning Comm. ($150 x 18mtgs) 36 Air Time - Cellular Phone 37 Travel, Conferences & Schools: Land Use Law Seminar 1,150 State Planning Conference 300 Misc Conf. /Seminars 300 Mileae 750 Sensib Land Use Coalition Meetings 180 38 Print /Publish: Update Maps(Albinson's, A & G, Technical Reprods.) 53 Subscriptions & Memberships: APA MN APA APA Journal Zoning News Sensible Land Use Cltn -20- -21- I FUND: # 10 General ACTIVITY: Planning & Zoning DEPT # 56 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted T992 ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1991 EST -91 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Regular Salaries 47,239 48,299 42,000 18,754 44,100 48,378 O.T. Salaries 250 20 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 3,451 3,023 3,360 1,311 3,374 3,701 07 PERA City Share 2,017 2,126 1,882 840 1,976 2,167 08 Ins. City Share 4,575 4,437 4,718 1,931 4,718 4,735 I 09 10 Medicare City Other 18 21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Withhold. . ' Total SUPPLIES 57,550 57,926 51,960 22,836 54,168 58,981 0 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 1 23 24 Maint - Equippment Maint - Buildings 285 800 178 800 1,490 26 General Supplies 278 280 350 128 350 300 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total 278 565 1,150 306 1,150 1,790 - - - - -- 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 31 Legal Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning ' 35 36 Contractual Communication 750 3,600 500 550 147 2,200 500 2,700 500 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 729 798 2 229 2,250 2,.680 38 Print Publish 496 128 400 400 400 39 Utilities- Gas. /Elec. , 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services ' Total 1,225 1,676 6,750 926 5,350 350 6 280 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member 177 177 385 112 205 205 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan , 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 177 177 385 112 205 205 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 127 1,150 600 424 424 63 Other Improve 6,000 6,000 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures 150 Total 127 1,150 6,750 424 6,424 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary ' 72 ------------------------------=-------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' _ TOTAL ACCOUNT - 59,357 61,494 66,995 24,604 67,297 67,256 0 -21- I I BUDGET COMMENTS: MUNICIPAL BLDG. CITY HALL DEPT # 57 Code # 23 Maintenance Contracts: Ricoh Copier 1,800 Postage Meter /Scale 300 Telephone System 560 Misc. (on call) 140 (Other Equipment Allocated to Departments) 24 Bldg. Maint. & recharge fire extinguishers, etc. 26 Cleaning supplies, ice control for sidewalks. Coffee supplies, pop purchases 35 Janitorial, carpet cleaning & rugs 4,000 Recycling put into Dept. # 67 36 City Hall telephone expense 39 Electric utility & garbage pickup (increased pick -ups) (Does not incl. Minnegasco as only one meter (in garage) for Garage, City Hall, Badger Warming Hse.) 41 Insurance package - Worker's Compensation (All Dept's) 50 Rental on Postage Meter & Pop Machine 52 Special Assessments - City owned property Includes misc. charges £rom County. 62 Transcriber 70 Transfer to Capital Improvement fund for Parking Lot improvements, gutters, office separation walls, Shelves, Sheet Rock, etc. Includes $15,000 for 1992, plus $10,000 for 1990 and $20,000 for 1989 -22- �I FUND: # 10 General ACTIVITY: Municipal Bldg City Hall DEPT # 57 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted T992 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Reggular Salaries 02 0.T Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 10 Medicare City Share -- ------------------- Other Withhold. Total --------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools ' 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 5,911 1,389 2,939 559 2,100 2,220 2,500 2,800 2,000 1,597 2,000 2,000 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies 2,457 2,288 3,500 1,226 3,500 3,500 ' Total 9,757 5,786 7,600 5,043 8,000 8,300 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial ' 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 Contractual 49,056 3,188 4,400 813 3,300 4,000 36 Communication 4,399 4,551 5,000 1,970 4,600 4,600 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities - Gas./Elec. 4,786 7,010 8,000 2,628 8,000 8,000 40 Improvements ' 41 Ins. -Total 59,778 62,825 66,000 66,000 69,000 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 118,019 77 , 574 83,400 5,411 81,900 85,600 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 141 268 400 219 400 500 ' 52 Licenses -Taxes 3,850 3,054 3,500 2,194 3,500 3,500 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- ' 56 Interfund Loan Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 3,991 3,322 3,900 2,413 3,900 4,000 0 ' CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 9,672 48,620 4,500 4,500 300 63 Other Improve 683 150 10,000 10,000 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures 10,559 Total 20,914 48,770 14,500 0 14,500 300 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 45,000 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund- Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 ' TOTAL ACCOUNT 152,681 135,452 109,400 12,867 108,300 143,200 0 -23- -. I I 3,000 11,775 225 BUDGET COMMENTS: POLICE DEPT # 58 Code # 23 Maintenance of Civil Defense Sirens 35 Police Contract 39 Electricity for Civil Defense Sirens (moved from Dept. 59) 43 Court Officer Expense Prisoner Expense Annual Auxiliary Police Dinner -24- I FUND: 110 General ACTIVITY: Police DEPT # 58 Code # ITEM Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted ' - - - -- - 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 02 O.T.. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 10 Medicare City Share --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Withhold. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - -- 0 ' SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equippment Maint- Buildings 760 500 500 500 26 General Supplies --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 760 500 0 500 500 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial ' 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Plannin ?ual 35 Contrac 350,292 354,150 368,102 214,726 368,102 376,786 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities- Gas. /Elec. 50 12 50 50 , 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 11,774 23,239 12,000 5,134 15,000 15,000 Total 362,066 377,389 380,152 219,872 383,152 391,836 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 1,542 1,500 1,500 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures ' Total 1,542 0 1,500 ------------------------------------ 0 1,500 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary ' 72 Refund - Reimburse. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 363,608 378,149 382,152 219,872 385,152 392,336 0 -25- BUDGET COMMENTS: FIRE PROTECTION DEPT # 59 Code # 35 Mound Fire Contract 4,410 Excelsior Fire Contract 90,988 39 Elec. for Warning Siren - Moved to Dept. 58 -26- r i fl n n 0 FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Fire Protection DEPT # 59 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June 1991 Annual Proposed Adopted EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES O1 Regular Salaries 02 O.T. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 Medicare City Share 10 Other Withhold. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 Maint - Equipment 24 Maint - Buildings 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 Contractual 74,532 79,501 88,527 66,395 88,527 95,398 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 33 248 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misc. Services Total 74,565 79,749 88,527 66,395 88,527 95,398 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense - - - -- from other Depts --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 74,565 79,749 88,527 66,395 88,527 95,398 0 1 -27- BUDGET COMMENTS: PROTECTIVE INSPECTION DEPT # 60 Code # O1 15% of Planning Director 50% Planning Assistant 100% Building Inspector 23 Computer contracts 26 General Supplies: Books Film & Processing 1,365 100 300 35 Contractual Inspections during v 37 Travel, Conferences & Schools: Northstar meetings 100 Inspect. classes 400 Conferences 250 Mileage 1,500 38 Print permit application forms 200 43 Animal Control 15,000 44 Goose Round -up (2 sites @ $1000 each) - last year 1991 53 Subscriptions & Memberships: I.C.B.O. 80 Northstar Chapter - ICBO 20 54 City remittances of building permit surcharges to State 63 Building permits software -28- FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Protective Inspection DEPT # 60 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June 1990 Annual Proposed Adopted Part Time Salaries 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Regular Salaries O.T. Salaries 37,096 39,162 43,905 18,468 46,100 03 Part Time Salaries 31 Financial 06 07 FICA City Share 2,766 2,661 3,512 1,221 3,527 08 PERA City Share Ins. City Share 1,617 3,433 1,738 3,587 1,967 5,202 827 1,892 2,065 5,202 09 Medicare City Share 1 4 Engineering 10 Other Withhold. ------------------------------------------------------------- 34 Planning Total 44,913 47,152 54,586 22,408 56,894 SUPPLIES 35 36 Contractual Communication 2,158 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 Maint-Equipment 285 450 450 24 Maint- Buildings 26 General Supplies 370 244 500 5 500 Total 370 529 950 5 950 OTHER SERVICES 50,538 3,866 2,264 4,948 ---------- - - - -- 61,616 o 1,365 400 ----- - - - - -- 1,765 a -29- 30 Legal 31 Financial ' 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 36 Contractual Communication 2,158 800 ' 37 38 Travel, Conf,Sch Print /Publish 1,599 185 1,649 2,250 700 2,250 2,.250 39 Utilities- 142 200 200 200 Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements ' 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 44 Misc. Services Other Services 6,670 13,252 15,000 4,245 15,000 15,000 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 2,000 2,000 - 10,612 17,043 19,450 4,945 17,450 18,250 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 75 75 100 100 100 54 55 State Surchgs Interest - 9,778 9,788 8,000 1,578 8,000 6,000 56 Interfund Loan Allocated Expense --------- from other Depts --------------------------------------- ' Total 9,853 9,863 8,100 1,578 ------------------------- 8,100 6,100 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings ' 62 Machinery -Equip 13 172 63 Other Improve 6,000 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures 1,149 Total 1,162 172 0 0 0 6,000 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent ' 71 Temporary 72 --------- Refund - Reimburse. ' -------------------------------------------------------------------- Total TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 66,910 0 74,759 0 83,086 0 28,936 0 - 83,394 0 93,731 0 0 -29- I 42,000 6,225 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BUDGET COMMENTS: CITY ENGINEER DEPT # 61 Code # O1 Enggineers Salary 1/4 Asst. Clerk Salary 03 Part -Time Salaries 26 Books & Materials 33 Engineering - General Contractual 36 Telephone - addition line needed 37 Conferences & Mileage 53 Subscriptions & Memberships 62 Engineering equipment - Transit, etc. 65 Office Furnishings -30- n r� 1 rl� FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: City Engineer DEPT # 61 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June 1990 1991 Annual Proposed Adopted 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES O1 Reggular Salaries 48,225 02 0.T Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 6,000 06 FICA City Share 4,148 07 PERA City Share 2,160 08 Ins. City Share 4,500 09 Medicare City Share 10 Other Withhold. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 65 , -033 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 Maint - Equipment 24 Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies ------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 37,991 61,068 25,000 8,093 34 Planning 35 Contrac£ 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities - Gas./Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 300 ------------------------- 0 300 0 25,000 3,000 700 2,500 400 ----------------------------------------------------------- Total 37,991 61,068 25,000 8,093 25,000 6,600 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 200 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense from other Dents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 200 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures -------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. -------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 37,991 61,068 25,000 8,093 2,000 1,500 ------------------------ 0 3,500 0 ----- ------------------------- 25,000 75,633 0 1 -31- I BUDGET COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE DEPT # 62 NOTE: Former Dept. # 62 - Garage has been merged with this dept. for 1992 Code # O1 100% Public Works Director 25% Assistant Clerk 1.5 Light Equip. Operators 21 Gasoline, Diesel Fuel "for operating equipment 22 Small tools, shovels, wrenches etc. 23 Maintenance of Equipment, incl. Radios 24 Maintenance to buildings - Paint 26 Inventory Items: cutting edges & automotive supplies Cleaning & other supplies for garage 35 Laundry service - uniforms, towels Contractual equipment & operator - Moved to Dept. 63 36 Telephones and pager (addl. line for Gopher One Call) 37 Public Works State Conference and Misc. Public Works Meetings 39 Utilities - Gas & Electric (includes natural gas char a for Garage, City Hall & Badger Park Warming House since here is one meter for all buildings) 43 Damage to private property - mailboxes, etc. 50 Misc equip rental for all PW Depts. 52 Fuel Tax & Misc Licenses 53 Subscriptions & memberships MN Street Superintendents Assn. MRC a i i I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Public Works Service 7 476 1,000 92 1,000 1,040 1,000 351 500 50 20 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 1 u Code Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted # ITEM 1989 1990 1991 1991 Est -91 1992 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 01 02 Regular Salaries 77,489 78,222 76,513 39,079 80,339 83,024 Financial O.T. Salaries 72 130 150 Audit 03 Part Time Salaries 33 Engineering 06 FICA City Share 5,825 5,895 6,121 2,946 6,146 6,351 07 PERA City Share 3,411 3,501 3,428 1,757 3,600 3,719 08 09 Ins. City Share Medicare City Share 7,736 7,228 8,517 4,123 8,517 8,129 10 Other Withhold. -------------------------------------------------------------------'------------- Travel, Conf,Sch 20 440 750 155 75C 38 Total 94,533 94,846 94,579 48,035 98,752 101,223 0 Utilities - SUPPLIES Gas. /Elec. 20 Office Supplies 40 Improvements 21 22 Motor Fuel & Lube Small Tools 8,931 749 11,084 1,173 13,000 1,000 5,390 335 13,000 1,000 13,000 ^ 1,100 23 Maint - Equipment 9,197 11,158 10,325 6,507 10,500 11,750 24 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maint - Buildings General Supplies 4,488 3,930 7,500 3,863 7,500 1,000 8,200 Total 23,365 27,345 31,825 16,095 32,000 35,050 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Plannin 35 Contrac ?ual 863 1,054 1,500 23 23 36 Communication 927 842 1,200 161 1,10C 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 20 440 750 155 75C 38 Print /Publish 40 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services ----------------------------------------------------------- 57 Total 1,850 2,393 3,450 339 1,873 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 920 52 Licenses -Taxes 852 53 Subscrip - Member 20 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense from other Depts Total 1,792 CAPITAL OUTLAY DEPT # 62 4,500 1,200 .750 6,500 200 13,150 0 1,000 1,000 50 --------------------------------------------------- 1,516 2,050 463 1,550 2,050 0 60 Land 153,641 61 Buildings 15 000 62 Machinery -Equip 106,104 23,208 61,000 63 Other Improve 11,118 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures Total 106,104 187,967 76,000 TRANSFERS 5,800 5,800 -------------------------------- 5,800 5,800 0 0 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------------ TOTAL ACCOUNT 227,644 314,067 207,904 70,732 139,975 151,473 0 -33- I BUDGET COMMENTS: STREETS AND ROADWAYS DEPT # 63 Code # O1 Street Maintenance salaries - 2.5 Light Equip. Operators 26 'Rock, gravel, & asphalt - increased patching program anticipated. 35 Contractual equipment and operator 37. Safety Training 43 Warning lights when street repair in progress. Striping centerlines. 63 Seal coating, rebuilding streets, purchase of culverts and storm water control - Includes all engineering costs related to road projects. MOVED TO LINE 70, TRANSFERS 70 Transfer to Street Reserve Fund -34- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Streets and Roadways DEPT # 63 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June 1991 Annual Proposed Adopted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Regular Salaries 45,050 61,374 60,689 23,597 64,027 66,093 03 O.T. Salaries 122 474 500 37 500 500 Part Time Salaries 18 06 FICA City Share 3,390 4,633 4,895 1,759 4,936 5,094 07 PERA City Share 1,985 2,771 2,741 1,059 2,891 2,983 08 Ins. City Share 4,504 5,796 6,737 2,468 6,737 6,472 09 10 Medicare City Share 1 Other Withhold. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total SUPPLIES 55,070 75,048 75,562 28,920 79,091 81,142 0 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools - ' 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 109 26 --------------------------- General Supplies 36,560 60,046 62,000 1,782 62,000 62,000 Total -------------------'------ 36,560 60,155 62,000 - ---------;--------'------------- 1,782 62,000 62,000 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 36 Contractual Communication 9,534 1,000 1,000 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 60 100 100 100 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities- Gas. /Elec. , 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misc. Services 2,175 1,209 2,000 2,165 2,000 3,000 Total 11,769 1,209 2,100 2,165 3,100 4,100 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental ' 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan ' 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 1,023 ' 63 Other Improve 150,364 198,961 200,000 43,000 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures Total 151,387 198,961 200,000 0 43,000 0 - - - - -- 0 TRANSFERS 70 71 Permanent Temporary 312,000 ' 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. __ Total _ 0 0 0 0 0 312,000 TOTAL ACCOUNT 254,786 335,373 339,662 32,867 187,191 459,242 - - - - 0 -35- I BUDGET COMMENTS: SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL DEPT # 64 1 Code # O1 Snow & Ice removal salaries - .5 LEO's ' 26 Salt & sand for snow removal, calcium chloride. i 1 1 1 1 1. 1 -36- ■ I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY:Snow and Ice Removal DEPT # 64 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Reggular Salaries 7,846 5,513 12,138 8,104 12,806 13,218 02 O.T Salaries 4,205 2,466 5,000 2,075 5,000 5,000 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 905 602 1,371 760 1,362 1,391 07 PERA City Share 517 357 768 456 798 812 08 Ins. City Share 1,477 528 1,346 1,082 1,346 1,295 09 10 Medicare City Share Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Withhold. Total SUPPLIES 14,950 9,466 20,623 12,477 21,312 21,716 0 20 Office Supplies -& 21 Motor Fuel Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies 11,631 9,415 13,000 4,834 11,000 13,000 ---------------------- - - Total - - -- ----------------------------------------------------- 11,631 9,415 13,000 4,834 11,000 13,000 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 31 Legal Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning ' 35 36 Contractual Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 39 Utili ies- Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services - - - - -- - - - -- Total ------------------------------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan ' 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 1 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 26,581 18,881 33,623 17,311 32,312 34,716 0 -37- I BUDGET COMMENTS: TRAFFIC CONTROL /STREET LIGHTING DEPT # 65 Code # O1 Salaries associated with traffic control 23 Maintenance to semaphores - one added at Hwy. 7 /Co. Rd. 19 26 Signs and posts. 39 Electricity for semaphores. t 43 Electricity for street lights r -38- I FUND: # 10 General ACTIVITY: Traffic Control Street Lighting DEPT # 65 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June 1991 Annual Proposed Adopted ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries salaries charged to streets ' 02 O.T. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 10 Medicare City Share Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Withhold. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 336 813 1,000 136 1,000 1,000 26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ General Supplies 2,263 4,020 4,000 428 3,500 3,500 ' Total 2,599 4,833 5,000 564 4,500 4,500 - - - - -- 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print /Publish . 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 2,285 2,622 2,500 815 2,500 2,500 40 Improvements 1 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services ------- 19,978 22,457 27,000 7,192 25,000 27,000 - - - - -- - - - - -- Total --------------------------------------------------------- 22,263 "25,079 29,500 8,007 27,500 29,500 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental I 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery - Equip ' 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - TOTAL ACCOUNT 24,862 ---------------------------------------------------- 29,912 34,500 8,571 32,000 34,000 0 1 -39- I 1,000 t t t t BUDGET COMMENTS: DANNITA /WASTE REMOVAL /WEEDS EPT Code # O1 Public Works salaries associated with property clean -up 35 Property clean -up Spring clean -up Moved Recycling- Knutson to Recycling Recycling incentives i Fund 43 Contracted weed spraying. 70 Transfer to Recycling'Fund -40- 1 -41- FUND # 10 General ACTIVITY: Sanitation / Waste Removal /Weeds DEPT # 67 Code Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted T992 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Reggular Salaries 2,743 4,988 4,855 210 500 500 02 O.T Salaries 1,051 970 1,000 343 343 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 285 444 548 42 38 38 07 PERA City Share 162 267 307 25 22 22 08 Ins. City Share 396 589 541 61 90 50 09 Medicare City Share 10 Other Withhold. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 4,637 7,258 7,251 681 993 610 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 10,299 63,378 87,300 500 1,000 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch . 38 Print Publish 39 Utili ies- Gas./Elec. 40 Impproovements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 2,600 2,650 3,000 3,000 3,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 12,899 66,028 90,300 0 3,500 4,000 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses - Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest- 56 Interfund Loan Allocated Expense from other Depts --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 15,000 10,000 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 15,000 10,000 0 - - -= I TOTAL ---------------------- - - --------------------------------------- ACCOUNT - - -- -- - - - 17,536 - -- ------------------------------------------- 73,286 97,551 681 ------------------ 19,493 14,610 - - 0 1 -41- I ' BUDGET COMMENTS: TREE MAINTENANCE DEPT # 68 Code # O1 Tree maintenance salaries - .4 LEO's l r 26 Paint for marking trees 1 35 Contracted tree removal. • t 37 Tree Inspection School. t -42- i - 0-------- 0-------- 0---- - - - -0- ---------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 18,457 22,713 25,090 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Total 3,422 11,715 11,998 11,955 12,563 12,890 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 Maint - Equipment 24 Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies 590 52 100 16 100 100 7 ---- - ---------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Total 590 52 100 16 100 100 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 2,196 6,601 10,000 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 59 100 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 3 6,481 10,000 12,000 5 50 ,100 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 2,199 6,660 10,100 6,486 10,050 12,100 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense from other Depts --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures ----------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. ----------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 6,211 18,427 22,198 aICz I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Tree Maintenance DEPT # 68 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted Y992 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 2,868 9,431 9,710 9,819 10,244 10,575 02 O.T. Salaries 12 252 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 216 722 777 725 784 809 07 PERA City Share 126 434 435 440 459 474 08 Ins. City Share 200 876 1,076 971 1,076 1,032 09 10 Medicare City Share Other Withhold. i - 0-------- 0-------- 0---- - - - -0- ---------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 18,457 22,713 25,090 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Total 3,422 11,715 11,998 11,955 12,563 12,890 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 Maint - Equipment 24 Maint - Buildings 26 General Supplies 590 52 100 16 100 100 7 ---- - ---------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Total 590 52 100 16 100 100 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 2,196 6,601 10,000 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 59 100 38 Print /Publish 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 3 6,481 10,000 12,000 5 50 ,100 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 2,199 6,660 10,100 6,486 10,050 12,100 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense from other Depts --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures ----------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 Refund - Reimburse. ----------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 6,211 18,427 22,198 aICz I BUDGET COMMENTS: PARKS & RECREATION /BEACHES DEPT # 69 Code # O1 Park maintenance - 1.4 LEO's 25% Park Secretary /Asst. Clerk. 03 Part -time Rink Attendants (545 hrs x 3 rinks x $6.00) 9,810 Part -time summer help (22 weeks x 40 hrs x $6.00) 10,560 22 Tools, shovels, scrapers, etc. 23 Maintenance to Park Equipment, Computer Contract, Typewriter 24 Maintenance to Park buildings. 26 Rock, dirt, fertilizers, seed, sand, etc 15,000 Resurface Hiking /bikingg trail 1,500 Signs for marking trails 700 34 Park Planner 35 Mtka Comm Svcs, lifeguards, weeds 10,000 Park Survey 5,000 36 Park telephones. 37 Travel, Conferences, Schools 38 Annual Parks Newsletter 39 Includes Natural gas for warming houses 43 Misc. Expenses, such as rubbish hauling, electrical work, etc. 50 Rental of portable toilets for Parks, School & Public Access Warming house (trailer) for Manor Park (3 months) 57 Park Referendum Expenses - Election 3,000 - 3,500 Education 1 - 1,500 62 Weed Sprayer 1,000 63 Resurface Tennis Courts, Badger & Cath. 8,000 Picnic Tables (5) 1,250 Repari Drainage, Field # 5, Freeman 2,000 - Plant Trees Common Are a /3 Fields 2,000 Basketball oops & Backboards, Cath. 500 -44- I FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY:Parks & Recreation /Beaches DEPT # 69 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June 1991 Annual EST -91 Proposed Ado ted p ' ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- ------------- 1992 992 1 - PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Regular Salaries O.T. Salaries 43,429 47,122 46,062 22,448 48,595 49,447 03 06 Part Time Salaries 92 7,361 60 11,409 500 18,000 70 6,483 500 18,000 500 20,370 07 FICA City Share PERA City Share 3,259 1,899 3,448 2,088 3,485 2,064 1,595 1,009 3,756 2,200 5,379 2,238 08 09 Ins. City Share Medicare City Share 4,111 108 4,511 174 5,177 261 2,121 94 5,177 261 4,550 10 ------ ---------- Other Withhold. I ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total SUPPLIES 60,259 68,812 75,549 33,820 78,489 82,484 0 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 253 371 150 77 150 150 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 1,117 514 853 278 2,000 253 2,000 2,000 26 ------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies 9,369 14,831 1,500 15,000 128 9,937 1,500 15,000 1,500 17,200 1 Total 11,253 16 333 18,650 10,395 18,650 ------ -------- 20,850 0 - OTHER SERVICES 30 31 Legal Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 35 Planningg Contrac£ual 6,815 12,083 6,280 5,000 10,000 5,187 2,690 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 36 37 Communication 1,123 1,944 1,200 1,200 1,200 38 Travel, Conf,Sch PrinMublish 178 13 300 600 3 471 50 600 50 600 3 9 Utili ies- 40 Gas. /Elec. Improvements 956 1,625 2,000 842 2,000 2,000 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 86 52 600 600 600 Total 9,158 21,997 19,700 9,193 24,450 24,450 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 52 Rental Licenses -Taxes 2,632 3,739 4,500 1,088 4,250 4,500 53 Subscrip - Member 250 250 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 1 56 Allocated Expense from other Depts 57 ----- Total Park Referendum ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,500 I 2,632 3,739 4,750 1,088 4,500 9,000 - - - - -- 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 199 19,500 17,100 1,000 63 64 Other Improve Future 5,000 5,000 351 13,750 65 Furn & Fixtures Total 199 5,000 24,500 17,451 0 14,750 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 83,501 0 115,881 0 0 0 0 0 143,149 71,947 126,089 151,534 0 -45- BUDGET COMMENTS: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEPT # 70 Code # 70 Provision for future Capital Improvement of Parks, Roads, Public Buildings and Lands, Etc. MT= 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 Ll FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Capital Improvement DEPT # 70 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget Jan 1991 -June Annual Proposed Adopted 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 02 O.T. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 Medicare City Share 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Withhold. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 39 Utilities - Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misc. Services Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Furn & Fixtures Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 163,112 163,112 165,000 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 163,112 0 163,112 165,000 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 0 163,112 0 163,112 165,000 0 -47- rl L Ci �I I J h FUND: #10 General ACTIVITY: Contingency DEPT # 71 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Bud Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado 1991 1991 EST - 91 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES O1 Re ular Salaries 02 0. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries 06 FICA City Share 07 PERA City Share 08 Ins. City Share 09 Medicare City Share 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Other Withhold. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planningg 35 Contrac£ual 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 39 Utili ies- Gas. /Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Ins. -Total 42 Debt Service 43 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misc. Services 50,000 50,000 80,118 Total 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 80,118 0 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip - Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from other Depts Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures Total --------------------------------------------- TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund- Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 80,118 0 -49- I BUDGET COMMENTS: WATER FUND REVENUES , 4702 Amount levied for payment of water revenue bonds 4704 Connection Fees for our residents to connect to other cities (pass -thru account 4705 Sale of Meters (50 @ $125 = $6,250) 4706 Estimate of 1992 water sales. 4711 Interest earned on investment of water funds 4712 Revenue collected from county for delinquent water bills certified to taxes. 4713 Permits to be sold (same number as meters) 50 @ $25 = $1,250 4717 Revenue from space rental of water tower to Cellular One 4718 Water hookups - Boulder Bridge System. -50- i i FUND # 60 WATER FUND REVENUES - BUDGET 1992 DEPT # 79 CODE # REVENUE SOURCE Actual 1989 Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 4702 Spec. Levy Debt 19,316 17,601 16,325 16,325 15,500 4703 Transfer 4704 Water -City Connect 4705 Sale of Meters 7,705 8,929 7,500 4,644 7,500 6,250 4706 Water Sales 143,267 147,141 110,000 23,440 110,000 135,000 4711 Water Int. Earned 1,697 200 406 1,000 800 4712 Water -Count collec 18,990 8,928 5,600 5,600 3,500 4713 Water Permits 1,570 1,955 1,500 1,485 1,700 1,250 4717 Antennae Space Rental 3,600 7,200 3,000 7,200 7,200 4718 Wtr Hookup -Bldr Brg 5,187 33,140 4,625 8,000 ------------------------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -' --------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- Totals 196,035 222,991 148,325 37,600 157,325 169,500 0 -51- BUDGET COMMENTS: WATER FUND DEPT # 80 01 10% Senior Accounting Clerk .25 Light Equip. Operator 20 Billing supplies & postage. 23 Includes maintenance contract for UB hardware & software. 24 Paint & Repair Pumphouses 26 Chemicals for water treatment 35 Munitech (New contract 1/1/92 - 12/31/92) 36 Autodialers for Pumphouses, Phone line for Gopher One Call 41 Insurance 43 Water testing - MN Dept of Health 52 Sales tax on commercial water sales. 63 Computer Hardware for Gopher One Call -52- I FUND # 60 ' Code # ITEM WATER FUND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET 1992 DEPT # 80 - - - - -- Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 199 2 N N ---------------------------------------------------------------- Total PERSONAL SERVICES 500 340 600 700 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 01 02 Regular Salaries 4,874 7,965 7,000 2,250 6,000 8,700 O.T. Salaries Machinery -Equip 167 63 Other Improve 234 03 Part Time Salaries 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures 06 FICA City Share 366 555 560 167 459 665 07 PERA City Share 213 334 300 101 269 390 ' 08 Ins. City Share 471 788 600 206 600 854 09 10 Medicare City Share Other Total 10 0 0 0 0 0 Withhold. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total SUPPLIES 5,924 9,819 8,460 2,724 7,328 10,609 20 Office Supplies 324 912 750 184 750 750 21 Motor Fuel & Lube ' 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 10,298 8,649 10,000 5,343 7,500 10,000 25 Depreciation 53,314 15 55,706 1,000 1,000 56,000 2,000 ' 26 General Supplies Total 9,932 9,211 12,000 3,776 10,000 12,000 73,868 74,493 .23,750 9,303 75,250 5,250 24,75Q OTHER SERVICES 30 31 Legal Financial 394 369 300 85 85 32 Audit 498 531 600 617 617 750 33 Engineering 946 4,199 2,500 225 1,500 3,000 34 35 Planningg ' Contrac£ual 29,994 32,894 35,000 25,413 45,000 55,800 36 Communication 1,104 1,214 1,200 443 1,000 1,.650 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 39 Utilities - ' Gas./Elec. 40 Improvements 41 Insurance -Total 4,517 4,561 5,000 2,183 4,500 5,000 42 Debt Service ' 43 Misc. Services ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 299 300 Total 37,752 43,768 44,900 28,966 52,702 66,200 OTHER CHARGES 50 Rental 52 Licenses - Taxes /Sale 543 568 500 340 600 700 53 Subscrip- Member 54 State Surchgs 55 Interest - Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense ----------------- Depreciation - - - - -- N N -53- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Total 543 568 500 340 600 700 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings 62 Machinery -Equip 63 Other Improve 234 120 500 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total 0 234 0 120 0 500 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. 4,000 Total 0 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 -53- I BUDGET COMMENTS: WATER FUND DEPT ,# 80 87 50 homes @ $90.00 /meter plus replacement meters 93 Interest and Agent Fees on Water Revenue Bonds -54- rI FUND # 60 WATER FUND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET 1992 DEPT # 80 ' Code Actual Actual Budget 19Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted # ITEM 1989 1990 (Amended) 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- OTHER EXPENSES n 1 u 1 -55- 84 85 Wtr Purch -Tonka Bay Wtr Purch - Excelsior 674 7,606 949 800 304 750 800 86 Wtr Purch 5,955 5,000 3,724 6,000 7,000 87 -Mtka Purch Water Meters 2,166 8,747 3,768 7,411 3,500 10,000 791 3,738 3,000 7,500 3,500 7,500 ' 89 90 Other Capital Outlay Water Line Const. 787 92 93 Water Bond Principa 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 94 Water Bond Interest Amesbury/Utilities 8,085 4,589 7,285 5,211 6,500 5,000 3,213 1,401 6,500 4,500 5,500 5,000 95 96 Badger /Utilities Boulder Bridge Util 3,859 4,352 3,994 4,139 5,000 5,000 1,397 1,262 4,000 4 4,500 4,500 97 Woodhaven Utilities 2,431 2,047 3,000 631 2,000 2,500 98 99 S E Area Utilities 10,713 11,487 10,000 3,591 8,000 11,000 Water Tower Utiliti 1,075 776 1,500 282 700 1,500 ______ Total ------- _______________________--------------------------------- 64,299 63,809 65,300 20,334 56,950 63,300 0 TOTAL WATER EXPENDITURES 182,386 196,691 142,910 61,787 192,830 __ _ _ _ _ __ 166,059 0 n 1 u 1 -55- I BUDGET COMMENTS: SEWER FUND REVENUE DEPT # 81 4721 $100 each for estimated 50 homes to be constructed in 1992 4724 Est. Sewer Revenue - Includes rate increase $20 /res /yr 4726 Estimated Interest earnings. 4727 Delinquent sewer bills collected by the County 4729 Metro SAC charges collected w /sewer permit $650 x est. 50 homes to be constructed on 1992 = $32,500 -56- 'I FUND # 61 SEWER FUND REVENUES - BUDGET 1992 Dept # 81 ' Code # REVENUE Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted ----------------------------------------------- SOURCE 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 4703 Transfer ---------------------------------------- 4721 Sewer Permits 9,100 8,400 6,000 4,500 7,000 5,000 4723 4724 Disposal Dump Fees Sewer Sery Charges 379,350 419,660 88,619 465,000 415,000 415,000 4726 Sewer Int. Earned 30,543 37,653 18,000 4,253 20,000 25,000 4727 Sewer Chg -Cnty Coll 62,113 27,690 30,000 30,000 30,000 4728 Refunds /Reimburse 244 222 4729 ---------- Metro Sac Charges ----- ------------------ 51,075 49,800 39,000 30,200 45,000 32,500 Total 532,425 ------- ------ ----- -------------' 51 7000 --- -------- - 557 500 0 - ' -57- I BUDGET COMMENTS: SEWER FUND DEPT # 82 CODE # 01 10% Senior Accounting Clerk .25 Light Equip. Operator 21 Vehicle costs for flushing lines. 23 Includes software maintenance Equipment Maintenance 25 Depreciation 26 Cleaning Supplies 35 Munitech (New contract 1/1/92 - 12/31/92) - $36,000 36 Phone line for Gopher One Call 37 To license Public Works staff -MSCC School 41 Insurance 43 Misc. expenses - also includes costs for backups in resident homes 84 SAC charges @ $643.50 (Est. 60 homes) 85 Charge for Sewage Flow through Excelsior Trunks 86 MWCC contract 62 Rebuild 2 Lift Stations 63 Hardware for Gopher One Call -58- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I FUND # 61 SEWER FUND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET 1992 DEPT # 82 Code # ITEM Actual 1989 Actual 1990 Budget 1991 Jan -June 1991 Annual EST -91 Proposed Adopted ' 1992 1992 PERSONAL SERVICES 01 02 Regular Salaries O.T. Salaries 5,794 24 9,021 7,000 6,253 7,000 8,700 03 Part Time Salaries 249 06 FICA City Share 436 639 560 418 536 667 07 PERA City Share 254 385 300 280 314 390 08 Ins. City Share 554 875 600 626 600 854 09 10 Medicare City Share Other Withhold. 10 --------------------------------------------- Total 7,062 11,179 8,460 '----------------------- 7,577 8,450 10,611 - - - - -- 0 ' SUPPLIES 20 21 Office Supplies Motor 971 1,524 1,000 436 1,000 1,000 22 Fuel & Lube Small Tools 36 200 200 200 23 24 _ Maint- Equipment Maint - Buildings 989 3,323 7,500 272 1,000 5,000 25 Depreciation 171,172 173,906 26 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Supplies 244 500 444 500 1,000 ' Total 173,132 179,033 9,200 1,152 2,700 7,200 0 OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 394 369 300 85 85 32 33 Audit Engineering 474 6,754 531 8,755 600 3,000 617 3,935 617 6,000 750 8,000 34 Planning 35 36 Contractual Communication 68,744 34,529 75,000 24,920 45,000 18,600 ' 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 187 200 350 200 38 39 Print Publish 40 Utilities- Gas /Elec 5,891 5,132 6,000 1,058 6,000 6,000 Improvements ' 41 Insurance -Total 4,217 2,904 3,500 1,711 3,500 3,500 42 Debt Service 43 Misc. Services 469 549 500 84 500 500 84 85 Metro SAC Charges 50,020 49,852 38,610 20,592 40,000 32,175 86 Excelsior Sewer Chg 9,301 13,000 7,000 ' Metro Service Charg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 262,093 273,524 307,111 179,151 307,111 376,665 Total 399,056 376,218 434,621 241,641 422,013 453,740 0 ' 50 OTHER CHARGES Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 3,343 53 Subscrip - Member ' 54 55 State Surchgs Int- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depreciation Total 0 3,343 0 0 0 0 0 ' CAPITAL OUTLAY 60 Land 61 Buildings ' 62 Machinery -Equip 2,542 40,000 52,000 60,000 63 Other Improve 180 500 64 Future 65 Furn & Fixtures Total 2,542 0 40,000 180 52,000 60,500 0 TRANSFERS 70 Permanent ' 71 Temporary 72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refund - Reimburse. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 581,792 569,773 492,281 250,550 485,163 532,051 0 -59- I BUDGET COMMENTS: RECYCLING FUND REVENUES REVENUES 4057 Recycling Aid from Hennepin County - 80% of Net Recycling Expenses 4115 Residential Charges for Recycling Services 4116 Residential Charges for City Clean -Up 4120 Revenue from Recycling Contractor from Sale of Recyclables 4778 Budget Transfer from General Fund for Operations EXPENSES CODE # O1 .20% Light Equip. Operator . Administration Salaries 20 Office supplies 35 Knutson - Recycling Residential (2200 x $1.70 x 12 Drop -off site ($490 x 1�) r City Clean -up 43 Recycling incentives -60- 45,000 6,000 10,000 1,300 ' I FUND # 62 RECYCLING FUND BUDGET - 1992 DEPT # 84 REVENUES ' CODE REVENUE SOURCE Actual Actual Bud Jan -June Annual Proposed Ado ted # 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 992 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4057 Cnty Recycling Aid 24,236 45,000 40,800 4115 Recycling Svc Chgs 4116 City Clean -up Fees 1,593 7,795 15,000 ' 4120 Revenue from Contr 1,577 4,000 5,000 4778 Transfers 10,000 10,000 ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 0 0 0 27,406 66,795 70,800 0 EXPENSES ' Code Actual Actual Budget Jan -June Annual Proposed Adopted # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM 1989 1990 1991 1991 EST -91 1992 1992 ' PERSONAL SERVICES 01 Regular Salaries 5,900 02 O.T. Salaries 03 Part Time Salaries ' 06 FICA City Share 452 07 PERA City Share 264 08 Ins. City Share 470 09 Medicare City Share 10 --------- Other Withhold. ----------------------- ' Total --------- 0 -- 0 0 0 7,086 0 SUPPLIES 20 Office Supplies 100 ' 21 Motor Fuel & Lube 22 Small Tools 23 24 Maint - Equipment Maint - Buildings 25 Depreciation ' 26 -------- General Supplies -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 ' OTHER SERVICES 30 Legal 31 Financial 32 Audit 33 Engineering 34 Planning 35 Contractual 21,336 60,000 61,000 36 Communication 37 Travel, Conf,Sch 38 Print Publish 59 200 500 ' 39 Utili�ies- Gas /Elec 40 Improvements 41 Insurance -Total 42 Debt Service ' 43 Misc. Services 1,300 1,300 Total 0 0 0 21,395 61,500 62,800 0 ' 50 OTHER CHARGES Rental 52 Licenses -Taxes 53 Subscrip- Member ' 54 55 State Surchgs Int- Interfund Loan 56 Allocated Expense Depreciation ' Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ACCOUNT 0 0 0 21,395 61,500 69,986 0 I ' -61- // a-? - a/ ,cam 44 z" 94 r /, 0-t-It Post-it "routing request pad 7664 ROUTING - REQUEST Please READ To HANDLE APPROVE and FORWARD RETURN KEEP OR DISCARD ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Date From _ r l At MAYOR Barb Brancel COUNCIL. Kristi Stover Bob Gagne Rob Daugherty Daniel Lewis CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 '(612) 474 -3236 NOVEMBER 25, 1991 .Honorable Mayor, City Councilmembers, Residents of the City of Shorewood: - Presented for your is the 1992 General Fund, - Water Fund,_ Sewer Fund.-,and Recycling Fund Budgets. These budgets, upon adoption by the City Council, become the guide for the delivery of services to be provided to the residents of the city in the coming year. The budget anticipates the level of funding necessary for the City to provide these services. In preparing the budget for the coming year it was necessary to consider many variables. Changes in financial aid from the state and new legislation, growth in the tax base of the city, types and quality of services provided by the city, preparation- and implementation of a - Capital Improvements Program, among - other factors were carefully considered, under the-'umbrella of the Statement of Purpose, Goals and Expectations adopted by the City Council. It is, and will continue to be, our goal to provide a value in municipal services to our residents to assure compliance with community laws and standards, and to keep residents informed of these services, laws and standards. This budget is proposed as - a guide = -to fulfilling this goal. For the first time, the city is facing its future °needs and challenges through the preparation of a capital improvement program. While the city has budgeted for capital improvements in years past, there was no formal plan for identifying and implementing capital projects. The capital improvement program will provide this essential plan,, list the city's goals for improvements in its infrastructure and equipment over the next five years, and, provide a sound financial plan for achieving those goals The first year of this program identifies the projects and A Residential Community on'Lake Minnetonka's Soutrliore i, ., Page 2 equipment needed in the coming year, and becomes the City's Capital Improvement Budget. The 1992 budget for capital improvements reflects the goals listed for the coming year in the capital improvement program. In 1992, a City Engineer position is being created. A budget has been established for this position which covers most duties previously performed by a contractual engineering firm. While this will not eliminate the need to use a contractual firm for larger projects, having an in -house city engineer it will result in cost and time efficiencies in the future. The funding for this position comes from shifts from other departments, as well as transfers from other city funds and from billing of pass- through costs. While this addition increases the overall General Fund budget, it will not increase, and should decrease, the cost of engineering. The proposed 1992 General Fund budget shows an increase of 4.16% over 1991. This increase in the budget is being offset by budgeting fund reserves from 1991. The budget includes no increase in property taxes from the amount levied for 1991. This results in a decrease in the City's tax rate, from 20.454 in 1991 to 20.146 in 1992. It is anticipated that services provided to residents will be maintained at the present level while the level of taxation remains constant. The real effect on city property taxes for a residential homestead lot varies due to a change in property class rates. An adjustment of these rates by the 1991 state legislature, in effect, decreases the tax rate on homes with a higher market value. The effect on city property taxes on homestead properties with market values of $100,000, $150,000, $200,000 and $250,000 home are as follows: Market Value Increase/ 1991 1992 (Decrease) $100,000 Taxable Value $1,320 $1,280 (3.03 %) City Tax 270 258 (4.44 %) $150,000 Taxable Value $2,720 $2,455 (9.74 %) City Tax 556 495 (10.97 %) $200,000 Taxable Value $4,220 $3,705 (12.20 %) City Tax 863 746 (13.56 %) $250,000 Taxable Value $5,720 $4,955 (13.37 %) City Tax 1,170 998 (14.70 %) Page 3 It is evident that the City's portion of the property tax bill will decrease for all the values listed above; however, the higher value properties, as was the intent of the legislation, will receive a larger decrease in taxes. Because of increases sewage rate charged to the City by the Metro Waste Control Commission and increasing maintenance costs, an increase in the quarterly sewer charge is budgeted in 1992. This charge has been unchanged since 1988. The proposed increase, $5.00 per quarter for residential properties, equals approximately 2.5% per year for each of the last four years. The City established a Recycling Fund in 1991 and is budgeting this fund for the first time in 1992.. The creation of this fund was made necessary due to requirements of the Hennepin County Recycling Grant Program. Activities related to the recycling program, including the annual city clean -up, are reflected in this fund. This results mostly in shifts of revenue and expenditures from the General Fund to the Recycling Fund, and has no negative or positive impact on either fund. In approving these budgets, the City Council is being responsive to the needs of the residents of the City, both now and into the future. We, therefore, recommend the adoption of the 1992 General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levy, Water Fund Budget, Sewer Fund Budget and Recycling Fund Budget. espectfully submitted, '\JA Ltkvvm ames C. Hurm City Administrator /Clerk Alan J ina a LAKE MINNET'ONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT D R A F T R E S O L U T I O N 12/4/91 The following resolution is proposed as a substitute for the Zebra Mussel proaction plan introduced by 'Tom Reese at the 11/16 Water Structures Committee meeting, incorporating 'a Eurasian water milfoil containment program also recognized as a priority for stage action now . . WHEREAS Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil have been identified as aquatic threats to the recreational lakes in the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel has been positively identified as existing in the Mississippi River at LaCrosse, WI, and potentially as close as St. Paul., and WHEREAS Lake Minnetonka has been infested with Eurasian water milfoil since 1987, and WHEREAS Zebra Mussel is largely spread by larvae not visible to the unaided eye in wet areas of a boat and possibly trailer equipment, and may also spread by larvae carried in live bait containers, either from bait provided from infested waters, or water added to bait, from infested waters, by persons using and saving bait for use it, uninfected waters; and WHEREAS Eurasian water milfoil is largely spread by plant fragments carried on watercraft and trailers, and WHEREAS the widespread infestation of these exotics will be extraordinarily costly to private as well as public interests, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District urgently recommends implementation of Resolution, Zebra Mussel /Eurasian Water Milfoil Containment, 12/4/91, P. 2 an immediate state action plan to prevent the spread of Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil into Minnesota's uninfested waters considering the following: 1) Funding comprehensive public education, exotic control programs and inspection programs at all public and private accesses where infestation of Zebra Mussel or Eurasian water milfoil is known to exist, through multi- source funding mechanisms which may include: a) Special levy authorization for all cities or counties and lake improvement districts b) Additional watercraft license surcharge; c) Inspection fee at public and private commercial accesses. 2) Immediately expanding public education, advising watercraft operators of the means by which Zebra Mussel and Eurasian water milfoil are spread; 3) Adopting stringent regulation prohibiting the taking of live bait from infested waters for private or commercial use, XXX Fishermen Advocating Intelligent Regulation November 25, 1991 Dear Fellow Fisherman. At about this tiwe one year ago, tournament fishermen were organizing to help develop new guidelines for the rational regulation of fishing tournaments in Minnesota. I. as sure you remember it well. Your time and effort were important. We were successful and you deserve a portion of the credit. This year, the fishermen and boaters of Minnesota are being attacked again. Several organizations are using the issue of exotic species infestation as a ploy to keep the Public Off their lakes. The uncont spread of eurasi water mi the zebra mussel and other exotic species is a serious problem. We believe scientific research will eventually yield an acceptable control system. The approaches suggested in the enclosed documents (Brought to our attention by the Minnesota Sportfishing Congress.) are totally unacceptablei Placing a closed sign at our public accesses Is not the way to protect Our state waters from infestation by exotics. You have shown your personal concern for the rights of fishermen and for the protection of our states lakes and rivers. Your friends know you to be a fair and thoughtful individual. I am certain you will be upset when you read the enclosed documents. I am: positive you will do something to try and stop these self serviD9 #@ *%$ * +'sl What arer'Ideas? Here are a few 1. Close as jenny a as po s s ible. 2, Restrict hours of use. 3. Stop fishing boats from entering milfc�il beds. 4. Restrict live bait use. 5. Stop new accesses construction. b. Stop free access to our lakes. Charge for the privilege of using public accesses. Tf the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Assaciation have their way. a days fishing on Lake Minnetonka would start with the following steps. Go to an approved boat cleaning station and pay to have your beat cleansed. The cleaning facility will them provide you with a certificate. Take your certificate to one of the few remaining ■ Iii , 'r - i =- 612561r P.04 assess sites. (They want to close 20 or more of the 26 current sites.) You will show your certificate to someone on the public payroll. He will verify that it has not expired. Only then wil you be allowed to pay for the privilege of using the access. This is not an exaggeration. Read it for yourself. Be aware that Minnetonka is not the only lake targeted for this type of action. Restrictions like these are being considered for state wide adoption. There are more than 20 agencies, associations, foundations and coalitions working together to close off Minnesota lakes to those people they view as threatening outsiders. They are politically active, well funded and very serious about keeping you cuff their eir lakes. The Minnesota Constitution says, ."navigable waters shall be forever free.'... without any tax, duty, impost or toll therefor." These people want to change the interpretation of our Constitution on this matter. In their view you should pay to get access to the free water surface. These organizations will be lobbying hard between now and the next legislative session. We need to mare sure our voices heard and our rights as boaters and sportsmen are protected. 'ghat should you do to help? Nothing less than everything you can. Personally. I am sending this letter to you and to 45 other people who were involved in last years tournament regulation battle. I am writing to my state congressman and senator. I aak supporting the Minnesota Sportfishing Congress with time and cash. Will you do the same? Please call your friends, write your state representatives, ortanize and attend meetings. Do every thing you can to inform others about this dangerous situation. S i ncer Dick Nelson F.A.X.R Encl. U . � 'r j - = r'. 1 5r.1 = i 5r. P 02 V " Bob DPP( ie:3,, ??.1 3 Mmiur Arc_ H_, Bruuktyn Center, I•IN 55429 December 4, 1991 TO: Gene Strom Lake Minntonka Conservation District SUEUECT: LMOD Proposal re: Zebra Mussel Containment Dear Gene: I am obliged to inform you that the Minnesota Sportfishing Congress rejects completely the LMOD sub committee proposal for Lake Minnetonka as regards the Zebra Mussell, Specificall 1, The MSC rejects any proposal to reduce transient beat accessibility to Lake Minnetonka (e,g, we would consider supporting a proposal to reduce the number of accesses provided that th nu of boat /trailer parking pl aces remained constant or increased to those in the overall lake plan. 2, The MSC rejects any proposal that would involve a foe prior to or subsequent to the launching of one boat at any of the public accesses, 3. The MSC rejects any proposal that would involve a requirement for decals or stickers to be applied to ones boat /watercraft uniquo to one water body. 4. The MSC rejects the concept of access closure during any pottion of a day because proposed "inspectors" are not present. MSC and it's statewide constituency is extremely concerned about the potential long term effects of known and unkno�n +n biological pollutant, on our public waters. MSC would agree to participate in further discussions regarding proposals on biological pollutant containment /elimination. We are also ready to assist with reasonable legislative efforts regarding these matters. Sincerely; V Bob DeVries Legislative Liasion P.S. We are under an impression that "someone" recently attempted to sway the Governor to take a position against development of the proposed tAaxwell Bay public access. If such attempts continue, MSC will have to assume that the committments made in the overall Minnetonka Plan was not generated in good faith. s " R404 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC'1' Action Report= Water Structures and Environment Committee" Meeting: 7:30 a.m. Saturday, November 16, 1991 Norwest Bank Bldg., Wayzata, Community Room Members Present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior, Chair; David Cochran, Greenwood; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Thomas Reese, Mound; Robert Rascop, Shorewood Douglas Babcock, Spring Park, Vice Chair; Tom Penn, Tonka Bay; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present: Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese A. Report of 11/15/91 Task Force meeting Reese reported Jay Rendall, Department of Natural Resources Exotic Species Coordinator, made a significant contribution to the 11/15 meeting. Foster added the DNR has developed an exotic species plan which is in draft form. It does include funding. The DNR is working with the Corps of Engineers, from which they expect to receive funding in 1992 Reese reported the appointment of a sub- committee to advise and help the LMCD develop the 1992 control program on Lake Minnetonka. The sub - committee will include representatives from Hennepin Parks, the DNR, Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA), Lake Restorations, Inc., a marina owner representative, Freshwater Foundation, and the LM( The sub- committee will meet December 2. On funding Reese said the legislature is providing DNR $440,000 in 1992, 1993 and 1994 from the $2 watercraft surcharge for control of all exotics. EWM will receive $250,000 for control state wide. Foster reported he attended the House Mini Session on 11/17. The Legislators indicate they are beginning to hear the EWM problem. To solve the EWM problem in Minnesota would cost $10,000,000. To treat the entire Lake Minnetonka with SONAR would cost $2,500,000. Foster commented on the difference of opinion between -the fishing community and the recreational boaters as to problems EWM does or does not cause. He mentioned Rendall said EWM will affect the fishing over a period of time as the good fishing along the milfoil beds has the potential to deplete the fish population. He also said Rendall hears from persons all over the state that milfoil is not being taken care of at the launch ramps I3_ Zebra Mussel Proaction Plan Reese presented a draft plan he designed to prevent the introduction of the Zebra Mussel into Lake Minnetonka, as a place to start discussion with the Board and to guide staff as follows: 1 J M Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 1. Reduce the total number of access points to just a few higher quality accesses. There are 26 accesses listed in the Arndorfer report. This plan would propose blocking off all except long term accesses and spread the accesses around the Lake. There would be about 6 high quality accesses with parking or shuttle buses. 2. Man these accesses up to 24 hours a day depending upon the access, the season and the weather. Block them off during periods that they are not manned. 3. License cooperating marinas and car washes, - to operate an approved system for boat cleaning that will cleanse a boat of any potential for introducing the mussel to the lake. 4. For a fee, boats to be launched are cleaned, and a certificate issued. 5. Certificates are turned in at launch points, certifying that the boat has been cleaned within a specified period prior to launch. The certificate would be valid for launching only on the day issued, details to be worked out. 6. Process applies to all boats to be launched in the lake, including lakeshore homeowners. 7. Boats are checked at access points for milfoil when leaving the lake. 8. Restrict live bait use in the lake. Foster added that the DNR controls where the water for bait tanks comes from. 9. Greatly increase the number of available boat rentals of all types. 10. Increase the number of rental slips on the lake. Reese said he has developed the plan in response to the expectations of a number of groups that the LMCD will come up with a plan. Rendall is developing a plan to control exotics from the source. Rendall encourages development of a plan by other organizations. Reese proposed discussion by the committee and forwarding the draft to the Board. The goal would be for the Board to instruct staff to finalize a plan to include staff, dollars and timing. Slocum noted the added problem of the mussel being carried into the lake by water fowl and float planes. Babcock acknowledged the good thinking behind proaction. He believes the plan would reduce the risk of large infestation. Penn sees the need for a pro - active stance. He recognizes that there may be parts of the plan LMCD can and cannot do. It is preventative maintenance. Foster said controlling the zebra mussel is more difficult than milfoil. He believes there has to be a weighing of the nature of the disaster with the radical nature of prevention as the draft plan proposes. He sees milfoil as a greater problem than zebra mussel. He questioned the cost of 24 hour access inspections. Foster also expressed concern about the fishing tournaments and suggests inspection and treatment should be required in their special event permit provision. He is also concerned about funding being taken away from the milfoil program. 2 Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 Grathwol sees the need to educate everyone about the problem. While he sees the chance of success as minimal everyone must be asked to help, change their attitudes, get ahem all to talk about it - it is going in the right direction. Cochran acknowledged there could be a problem with implementation, but he would like to see a plan, perhaps run through the EWM Task Force, and presented to the Beard. Cochran moved, Babcock seconded, to forward the concept for a proaction plan designed to prevent the introduction of the Zebra Mussel into Lake Minnetonka to the Board for discussion. Motion carried. The executive director reported the Minnesota Lake Management Federation appointed a steering committee which meets on 11/16 to deal with exotics. This effort will bring in the whole state. Radical changes are needed. That group will welcome public agencies to bring out the costs (dollars, inconvenience and sacrifice) and determine the public's willingness to support it. Babcock added that if there were enough money to cover the costs there may not be the negative reaction expected from the public. Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, that the LMCD Environment Committee direct the executive director to present the conceptual plan to prevent the introduction of Zebra Mussel into Lake Minnetonka - to - the Minnesota Lake Management Federation as an indication of the committee's concern about Zebra Mussel and that this is one method being contemplated for the protection of Lake Minnetonka. Motion carried. WATER STRUCTURES The agenda was amended to consider Item 3 to accommodate the public. 3_ Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay, Excelsior The Excelsior Park Tavern (EPT) multiple dock license was brought before the committee for clarification. In 1990 the ownership changed from a private yacht club facility to a public restaurant, the Excelsior Park Tavern. When operating privately as the Excelsior Bay Yacht Club (EBYC) there were 32 transient slips. The EBYC applied for a reconfiguration of the dock with eight additional slips. They were granted approval of 40 slips, 26 for overnight storage rental, 10 transient and 4 for charter boats which would board and discharge passengers as well as docking overnight. The license was conditioned upon furnishing specific amenities. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared. The City of Excelsior denied the use of slips for boarding and discharging charter boat passengers because of a lack of sufficient parking. The additional eight docks have not been built. The EPT has been operating with the 32 original slips, 18 of which are overnight storage, 10 transient and 4 for - continued .S Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 charter boat overnight storage. Amenities required under the special density provision of the new dock license were provided except for the charter boat operation, prohibited by the City of Excelsior due to parking limitations. EPT leased transient dock space from the Mai Tai, a non 'operating adjacent restaurant, in 1991. EPT indicated it does not have immediate plans to rebuild the dock with the additional 8 slips. Michael Brozo, EFT, said they operated in 1991 with only a small ten passenger catamaran for charters. They plan to operate three small capacity charters in 1992, two to fourteen capacity. It is not known whether the City of Excelsior will approve these three smaller charters. Babcock said the reason the license was approved was the availability of the charter boats. In view of the denial of this service by the City, it is his judgment that a new license is required. Fred Bruntjen, EPT, said the EPT does not plan dock reconfiguration at the present time. Urathwol stated that the committee is looking at the 40 boat license. The LMCU is not getting what it was promised. The EPT needs to state what it wants to do. Babcock suggested the EPT withdraw the application and proceed with a 32 slip application. Then the owner could re- apply for the 40 slips after January when the moratorium on multiple docks ends. Babcock added he is not against a new application for this area as the location demands it. He does not feel the conditions for the special density license have been met. He voted in favor of the 40 boat license only because of the charter boats being available for public use. Bruntjen said the EPT wants to keep the rental slips as that helps with their financing. He noted it cost $6000 to provide life guards for the public swimming program amenity. Money from the slip rental was allocated to that operation. Cochran was excused. Rascop said the circumstances call for a new application. He suggested denying the 40 slips. Bruntjen asked how they could operate as a business if the whole plan is changed. They are working with the City. EPT wants the overnight storage and charter boat operation. This is the time of the year EPT will be advertising for 1992 rentals. Urathwol summarized the discussion by saying this comes before the committee because of the change in the charter operation, the change from a private to a public operation and because of the delayed reconfiguration. He stated the committee wants to get more transient slips and a resolution as to how charters will be handled. Now that the EPT is public, Foster sees need for more transient slips and less need for amenities. He suggested a trade-- off between the swimming lessons and more transient slips. Reese noted the smaller charters proposed do not need as much parking. 4 Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 Rascop said as far as he is concerned the EAW which went to the City was not approved for 40 slips with the required amenities. A new application is needed. Babcock moved, Foster seconded, to refer the Excelsior Park Tavern license to the staff to work with the applicant to reach a conclusion which is acceptable to the applicant and meets LMCD requirements. The staff report is due at the 12/4/91 meeting of the Board. Motion carried. Foster asked that item 3 be reintroduced subsequent to the discussion of items 1, 2, 4, and 5 on the agenda. The applicant indicated to Foster that he needs additional answers. The EPT would be comfortable with amending the license application for 32 slips. They would keep the swimming lessons despite the cost. EPT does ask for 15 transient docks, 14 overnight docks and 3 charter boat docks for both overnight and loading and unloading passengers. This will allow the EPT to go to the City of Excelsior with a plan approved by the LMCD. Foster moved, Slocum seconded, to recommend to the Board an amendment to the new dock license application for the Excelsior Park Tavern to have 15 transient slips, 14 overnight storage slips and 3 charter boat slips. The charter boats would be overnight storage and would load and unload passengers. The other amenities would remain the same as they were with the 40 slip application. The configuration would remain unchanged. Babcock expressed concern if the City says no to charter boat loading and unloading. Foster suggested that the - three charter slips would then go into transient use. Babcock expressed concern about whether there are enough amenities for 14 storage slips if the charter boats are denied. This is a negotiated arrangement coming out under the Code prior to the amenity points amendment. He added he does not believe whether a city denies or approves an application should affect LMCD's position. Babcock asked whether an EAW would be needed. The executive director confirmed an EAW is not needed unless there is a dock expansion for a facility over 20,000 sq ft per Environmental Quality Board Rules. Bruntjen was advised that if the EPT wants to expand to 40 slips it will have to make a new dock and special density license application. The motion carried. 1. Bupp Length Variance Application Grathwol reported the review of the public bearing!' report and findings has been postponed to the January, 1992 meeting' as the applicant is still preparing his proposal with the affected neighbor(s). 2. Nagel Dock Use Area Variance The committee received a draft of the order for the application for variance by Terrance and Jill Nagel. The 5 Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 executive director asked for a change in wording on page 2, the second sentence to read: Likewise, the dock which had existed on the Nagel parcel for a number of years _l tad been outside of the authorized dock use area for that parcel and has been so re- constructed Reese moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of the draft Order for the Nagel dock use area variance with the corrected wording as suggested. Motion carried. 4. Resolution to Implement Fee Increases Approved at the 10/23/91 Board meeting. The Resolution as presented was corrected as follows: Paragraph 3 to read: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that application fees for licenses required by the Code provisions hereinafter cited shall supers Resolution 61 and 62 and be as follows: Section lc is to be deleted and the subsequent sections renumbered. . Babcock moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of a Resolution Setting Fees for Licenses for Multiple Docks or Mooring Areas, Commercial Docks, Launching Ramps and Docks in Excess of 100 feet, for District Mooring Areas, for Deicing, for Special Density Licenses, for Variances, and for Permanent docks with the corrections as noted. Motion carried. 5. Staff Review of Proposed Registration of Docks with 3 -4 Restricted Watercraft_ The committee received a report from Thibault dated 1.1/8 responding to the recommendation for registration of docks with 3 or 4 restricted watercraft. The report includes the procedure for identifying the docks, notification of the owners and the follow -up and a detail of the implementation. The staff conclusion is a recommendation to postpone the implementation of registration for at least 2 years. The implementation was determined to be very time consuming. Staff will continue to inventory unlicensed docks with 3 or 4 restricted watercraft. The committee proceeded to discuss the proposed registration and alternatives. Grathwol said the study originated by recognizing there are about 6,000 boats on the Lake. Management Plan study discussions said that number may double. The sub- committee was looking for a way to control this potential growth. Slocum said there should be a mechanism to control the growth of the rentals at private docks. He feels there is a positive in the registration proce:;s. Residents who have 3 -4 boats at their docks should prove the boats are their own. If a complaint is received it would only be necessary to ask if the boats are registered. Foster suggested LMCD investigate advertisements for rental space at private properties. Thibault said the individuals advertising in the newspaper are obvious offenders. Others rent to friends or by word of mouth without. advertising. Renter:_ could. be contacted and advised that if they are going t o rent slips they are required to have a commercial dock license and must comply with city ordinances. h Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 Penn wondered if this is the best use of Thibault's time. It would seem that responding to the ads and handling complaints would be as effective as searching out the 3or 4 boat docks. Babcock wanted it known that the LMCU is not saying residents cannot have 3 or more boats. If renting, they must pay the same fee and meet the same requirements as a commercial marina. The executive director added that the annual inventory of boats would indicate if there is growth in the number of 3 or 4 boat docks, a valuable boat storage growth indicator to monitor. Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to accept the staff report, to direct the staff to continue - to monitor 3 or 4 boat docks and seek a way to find new methods of enforcing the commercial marina activities (at residential docks). Motion carried. 6. Policies and Procedures Subcommittee Study Babcock presented a summary of administrative and code amendments recommended by the Policies and Procedures Subcommittee. He did not ask for action, ,lust review: Grathwol suggested another ordinance change which requires registration of combined residential docks. Babcock said he would rather not meet as a sub- committee again. He would like to address this at the Water Structures Committee level. Grathwol said the report could be accepted and placed on the January committee agenda with anticipated action at the January Board meeting. Thibault mentioned the Bupp and Whinnery docks, both in excess of 100', and currently under discussion. She asked whether they need a license as well as a variance. The Code currently requires docks over 100' to be licensed, as well as requiring a variance. The proposed ordinance on lighting would delete the licensing requirement for docks over 100', because all docks over 100' also require a variance. Grathwol said this will be handled at the January meeting. Babcock called attention to the three types of license applications recommended in the changes, new, renewal and amended". The executive director said the amended application, has been discussed with the LMCD attorney. The Code Sec. 2.03, subdivision 7, provides for a new dock license when any changes are made. The Board may waive the fees and public Bearing under conditions stated in the Code. Babcock said he favors allowing minor dock changes regardless of density. Grathwol said on grandfathered docks, when their density exceeds 1:10', the District should retain control over these docks. Babcock stated that allowing minor changes permits the marinas to better themselves over time. Pillsbury was excused. Babcock agreed to continue the study to the January committee meeting. 7 Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 7. Review of Proposed Code Amendment re High Intensity Lights in Shoreland Area. Grathwol reported the proposed amendment had its first reading at the October Board meeting. Reese emphasized the problem is where the lights are directed. Babcock suggested a wording that if the filament is visible, the lighting is not legal. The executive director said the lights may come from buildings. The proposed Ordinance was sent to the cities for their comments. He suggested this is an opportunity for the cities to come up with a uniform lighting ordinance. That would attack the problem from the shore where the light is emanating_ Reese favors the idea of involving the cities. Foster said he opposes this ordinance because it is riot definitive enough. 1) The Ordinance for deicing requires lighting the entire area. 2) It does not address street lights 3) The lights at the Excelsior Commons blinds anyone driving into the area. 4) It.does not address non -lake shore property. Foster mentioned the type of low -level lights Deephaven has on its docks and the use of shielded street lights along their boat slides. Reese raised the question of why this provision is being proposed for the multiple dock license ordinance when it addresses private docks. Babcock also mentioned having it in a separate ordinance. Grathwol responded that the LMCD attorney determined a provision in a separate ordinance would not be enforceable, except as it relates to regulating light on docks. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, to recommend the Board hold the second reading at the January meeting to give the cities an opportunity to respond. Motion carried. 8. Deicing Applications Reese moved, Foster seconded, recommended approval of the following deicing applications Renewals Dennis Carlson, Greenwood, St. Albans Bay Crystal Bay Service, Ororno,Crystal Bay Curly' s Minnetonka Marina, `I'onka Bay, Echo :Bay Frank Elshaug, Greenwood, ST. Albans Bay Gayle's Marina, Orono, Maxwell Bay Gray's Bay Marina, Minnetonka, Grays Bay Howard's Point Marina, Shorewood, South Upper Lake Minnetonka Boat Works, Orono, Browns Bay Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata, Wayzata Bay Douglas Ramstad, Minnetonka, Wayzata Bay Paul Resberg, Minnetonka, Grays Bay Tonka Bay Marina,Tonka Bay, Lower Lake South Rodney Wallace, Greenwood, St. Albans Bay Wayzata Yacht Club- -Site 1, Wayzata, Wayzata Bay Wayzata Yacht Club - -Site 2, Wayzata, Wayzata Bay City of Wayzata, Wayzata Bay James Wyer, Deephaven, St.Louis Bay R Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 New William Hansen, 5450 Three Points Blvd., Mound, Jennings Bay at Sea Horse Condominiums, 1 slip, applicant will furnish a letter of approval from Seahorse Condominiums. Doug Waldoch, 4215 North Shore Drive, hound, West Arm Motion carried. 9. Proposed DNR Access at; Maxwell Bay The executive director presented a report on the proposed DNR access for Maxwell Bay. He said JoEllen Hurr, Orono, reports that the DNR proceeded on the access acquisition because they were invited to purchase the land. One of the points favoring this access is that it satisfies a Management Plan objective to provide more car /trailer parking, but the Management Plan does not require an access ramp. Hurr advised the executive director that the DNR would be better served by looking for more car /trailer parking space not on the Lake shore. The executive director continued - t - hat the Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA) is concerned about adding another access in that bay as there is an access in North Arm. The LMLOA's line of reasoning is to get the DNR to move the access or go for parking off the Lake. The LMLOA is 'pointing out to the residents that this is a marginal site for any form of development. The long term potential for that site would work well for park property. Foster said he has some concerns that in the Management Plan LMCD confirmed file need for 700 car - trailer spots The Lake needs more car /trailer parking. This site is between - two marinas in a highly commercial area of the Lake. Foster suggests the LMCD support the plan. Slocum added this site is practically commercial anyway. Grathwol suggested the committee determine what kind of ramp would be the best. Grathwol suggested the ramp, as this location is a shallow area, would be good for small boats. The DNR should build a model ramp for smaller boats. Babcock said he does not want more access points because of the Zebra Mussel threat. He reminded the committee that the Management Plan calls for the LMCD to be the lead agency for developing the Lake. Foster noted this is a modest 25 car access. The ramp should be of the shallowest design for small boats: Slocum said it is a rarity to get a new access. He believes the committee should support the acquisition. Babcock moved, Foster seconded, to recommend a sub- committee be formed to work with the DNR giving general support to the acquisition of public access at Maxwell Bay. The subcommittee is to include representatives of local residents, the DNR and to include Hurr. Motion carried. Reese mentioned that Hennepin County has posted "No Trailer Parking'signs on Bartlett Blvd. near the Mound city access. Fie said parking has not been a problem on this street. Foster said conversely on County Road 16, that road is signed to restrict parking to car trailer parking. 9 ■ Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 10. Grays Bay Dam Control The executive director reported that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Grays Bay Dam Control policy will be discussed at a meeting on 11/21. Cochran has stated he believes the policy has worked well and does not suggest any recommendations or changes. The committee noted this was discussed at the October Board meeting. On the Friday after the Board meeting the dam was shut down at 928.67' 11 Other Grathwol reviewed the accomplishments of the committee in 1991. He mentioned 1) Inventory of docks over 100' 2) Review of the 3 -4 boat storage situation :3) A preliminary study of wetlands 4) Lake recreation use statistics which need more documentation 5) Completion of the amenity value study 6) Review of the shoreland zoning 7) Fee study review 8) Study of dock use measurements. Grathwol feels there was success. 12. Boat License Surcharge Grathwol said he has talked to Bill Becker of the DNR about a boat license surcharge. Grathwol feels that if done right there is a way to get a boat license surcharge. We would have to make some allies and share with some other lakes. Foster mentioned the possibility of a county license. The people up north are paranoid about licensing because of the tourists. They do not seem to have an objection to Metropolitan licensing if there is a sharing. Babcock suggested the option of licensing on lakes of a certain size. Penn said we would be better off focusing on the user group. Reese said Hennepin County has appropriated, $150,000 for milfoil control in 1992 and future years. The County Attorney advised the County Board it has no authority to make such appropriations. The County Commissioners are expected to seek legislative approval to do so. LMCD has applied for $70,000 in matching funds in anticipation of their availability. If this is accomplished and if all funding comes through, it could eliminate the need for boat sticker funding. Penn said the boat sticker idea would help fund the LMCD. Babcock added there are things in the Management Plan such as water quality management which will need funding. Grathwol concluded that he does not believe it will go through the legislature this session. 13 Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 a.m. See Page 11 for signatures 10 r Water Structures and Environment Committee November 16, 1991 FOR THE COMMITTEE Eugene atrommen, Executive Director James N. Grat.hwol, Chair 11 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Water Structures and Environment Committee D R A F T C O N C E P T 11/18/91 PLAN OF ACTION TO PREVENT THE INTRODUCTION OF ZEBRA MUSSEL INTO, AND TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL OUT OF, LAKE MINNETONKA I. Maintain a limited number of high quality public and private accesses, closing remaining accesses. 2. Attend operating accesses up to 24 hours daily, depending upon the access, season and weather. Operating accesses will be closed during unattended periods. 3. Authorize licensed marinas and car washes to operate a user -fee supported total boat cleaning service, from which a "certificate" will be issued for all boats entering the lake from an attended operating access. 4. Boats with "certificates" are allowed lake entry at attended - operating accesses, subject to an access fee for entry verification and departure inspection for Eurasian water milfoil contamination. Dealer - certified new boats exempt at first launch with proof of purchase. 5. Restrict live bait use in the lake to bait from certified zebra mussel and EWM free sources. 6. Greatly increase the number of available boat rentals of all types. 7. Increase the number of short term storage rental slips on the lake. 110 LU 01 1U VV oesn 31 t work .h a result series' au- ablems with esign. Obvi- is the result r!tation — ! .cted com- er of all is ip includes successful- . programs tms in the selected on ited by one ven if they I treatment - sota's Pro- ,, Seals and n Services' eject Path - re complet- are treated ran in the grams, in- ho partici- eir release icant error "untreat- pie includ- the major - ould likely ip — even atment or t the Shak- )r women. at female ited, will male of- ss the in- compari- had been annot con - sex offend - as suggest- J only df ee crimi- ;hest sex cent of for see- up to 3oints in 600 rticles ds. ,h ma- )le; we timely. )f mail return vay to article !d is to letters re ac- 111 ap- ors of have !cation three ond- through fourth - degree criminal sexual conduct, this study tells us little about treatment outcomes for a large majority of sex offenders. Even in the state prison system, only 36 percent of the sex offenders have been convicted of first- degree crimi- nal sexual conduct. In addition, one would have expected the writers to point out to the reader that at least one of the four treatment programs had a rearrest rate which was signifi- cantly lower than the rate found in the "untreated" group. Other issues which also must be con- sidered when attempting to assess the value of treatment in helping protect society are whether some offenders who would have escalated to more violent behavior or murder do not, whether some who reoffend commit fewer offenses, and whether the se- verity level of new offenses might be lower than the original offense. Perhaps these factors are of little con- solation to a weary public, but they are part of the whole equation. What the authors of the "Free to Rape" series could have legitimately concluded is that there are a number of extremely dangerous offenders whom we have not been able to change significantly through incarcer- ation, treatment or other prison pro- grams. We need to better identify these individuals and pursue civil commitments. From a legislative perspective, a number of changes can be made to help address this problem. The psychopathic personality com- mitment statute needs a new name and more objective, measurable de- fining criteria. Such commitments should be pursued at the time of the criminal adjudication whenever pos- sible, and those committed under this statute should be housed in a separate facility designated for this purpose. An additional degree of criminal sex- ual conduct needs to be incorporated in the criminal code, with a much longer presumptive sentence and statutory maximum for those who- - commit stranger -on- stranger sex of- fenses using a weapon and for those who commit a sex - related or other- wise violent abduction of a child. Juvenile sex -crime convictions should be counted in the same way as prior adult felonies are for the pur- pose of sentencing if subsequent sex - related convictions are incurred by an adult offender. All sex offenders need at least five years of supervision after being re- leased from prison. While sex offender treatment will never solve the problem of sexual violence, treatment of identified per- petrators needs to be a part of any comprehensive plan to reduce the incidence of sexual abuse. The Star Tribune's "Free to Rape" series lacked journalistic integrity and may have a counterproductive impact on attempts to formulate sen- sible public policy regarding the problem of sexual violence in our society. Gerald T. Kaplan, Minneapolis. Ex- ecutive director, Alpha House; psy- chologist. I� To save money, cancel the presidential primary When the Legislature established a new presidential primary for Minnesota — the first such pri- mary in 36 years — proponents argued that Minnesota should se- lect presidential delegates through a primary instead of precinct cau- cuses. However, as the primary date approaches, it is clear that the primary will not accomplish what those proponents intended. While many of the legislators who supported the primary have recog- nized that it does not affect the delegate selection process, the Star Tribune fails to see this. Its Nov. 24 editorial states that the primary will "broaden party par- ticipation (and) increase candi- date attention to Minnesota." Will the primary accomplish this? Both parties are operating under their standard precinct caucus/ convention system of delegate se- lection, which does not include any consideration of primary re- sults. Most voters will choose not to participate when told that the outcome of the primary has no bearing on either party's delegate selection process. Some of those who might choose to vote anyway will be angered when they find out that their party preference will be- come public information if they choose to participate. Will candidates pay more atten- tion to Minnesota? According to an activist familiar with one of the presidential campaigns, their can- didate is questioning whether it is even worth paying the filing fee for the primary. The Star Tribune editorial stated that current court cases don't fit Minnesota's situation exactly, so the courts might force the parties to abide by the primary. However, the Supreme Court has made it clear that while the states are responsible for the fair con- duct of elections, parties are enti- tled to determine what process to follow for delegate selection. The political parties have examined the court cases and would not be so willing to use their regular dele- gate election process if they did not believe they had a strong legal case for doing so. Many of the original legislative proponents of a primary argue correctly that if Minnesota ever is to return to a presidential prima- ry, it would be smart to hold off until the change is done correctly. Holding a meaningless primary now would draw few voters and turn people off to the idea of pres- idential primaries. In addition, most of these legislators do not share the Star Tribune's willing- ness to spend $4 million on a primary just because they wish it was significant. Regardless of the editorial's wish- ful thinking, the primary's only impact will be increased cynicism among Minnesota voters when they find out that the primary has no impact on the presidential nomination process. The Star Tribune is also incorrect in believing that support for post- poning the primary comes from a small movement" of local gov- ernment officials. What started out as scattered opposition might now be better described as a tidal wave of outrage from local gov- ernment officials who have to find the money to pay for the primary. Local officials know it is another unfunded mandate from the state that will take money away from police and fire services or parks and recreation budgets. The estimated $4 million cost of the primary might be seen as a good investment if it had a real and positive impact on our presi- dential election process. However, Minnesota's state and local gov- ernments do not have millions to spend on a meaningless primary that is likely to be ignored by candidates and voters alike. If the Star Tribune thinks Minne- sota should hold the primary in the belief that such a primary would be a better indicator of public opinion than precinct cau- cuses, we could cancel the primary and the paper could spend $4,000 to conduct a presidential prefer- ence poll on April 7 — the day the primary is scheduled — savings millions of dollars in the process. I am disappointed that the Star Tribune, which frequently editori- alizes in support of cutting state and local government spending, should be so eager to spend $4 million on an irrelevant candidate preference balloting. I believe the taxpayers, like the local officials they elect to govern their commu- nities, are far less willing to sup- port such a high cost for such a frivolous purpose. I hope the Legislature will act quickly during the first two weeks of the 1992 session to void this waste of $4 million. By canceling the 1992 primary, we can save the money now and debate the appro- priate method of delegate selec- tion later. Sen. John Marty, DFL- Roseville. Author of Senate File 1598, legis- lation to postpone the 1992 presi- dential primary. N police The Star Tribune's "Fear of AIDS a murder" ignored, n interpreted the per case. Hennepin Co Services policy ma . care, including resu sary, if a trauma Larson is still aliv responders to the er Minneapolis police the emergency car Larson had every was his only Chang to survive. Your editorial Clain sation" about lack "on fear, not subs careful and sometin tigation brought the In covering the sh Time newspaper, questioned why Lai en to the hospital personnel arrived so Witnesses told us medics provided v even though Larsor police arrived. M Agent Charles Min formed city employ confirms in his rel was alive when poli ers arrived and he interview that no er tative care was inil violation of county I Agent Miner, like a trained in cardiopu tation (CPR) as req ployment, a fact n( your editorial. Minei in his other part-t: suburban police der trained, authorized Miner was then and in the Law Enforcer Mankato State Univ Miner's careful, deta scene at Larson's mu clear that Larson i Miner arrived and wl police officers arrive ness has corroborate( Dr. Ernest Ruiz, chi County Emergency h told us that if Miner' rate Minneapolis pol started CPR and Lai been transported to 1 ty Medical Center. Further, Ruiz told Minneapolis police h signs of life so clew Miner, ordinarily th start CPR if Miner h them that Larson v they arrived. Unfortunately, Mini apparently did not a questions about Lars if, indeed, they did n of life when they arri reports do not descri condition when they i Officer Shotley, the fi police officer on the us that he doesn't rem However, Miner does in an interview Dec. Larson was still mov neapolis police arrive( Hennepin County's i of the paramedics' scene found that pai appropriately becau! them that Larson was ing to Ruiz, police di the paramedics that i signs of life when the 1 arrived. CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 1 M I N U T E S CALL TO ORDER Chairman Benson called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Planning Commission Chairman Benson, Commissioners Leslie, Schultz, Rosenberger and Planner Nielsen. Absent: Commissioner Bongaards. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Planning Commission Minutes October 1 1991 Schultz moved, Rosenberger seconded to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of Oct. 1, 1991. Motion carried - 4/0 Leslie moved, Rosenberger seconded to approve the following Planning Commission Minutes: 1. July 17, 1990 2. August 7, 1990 3. August 21, 1990 4. October 2, 1990 5. January 15, 1991 6. May 21, 1991 7. August 6, 1991 8. September 3, 1991 Motion carried 0 4/0 1• 7:30 PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES Applicant: North Suburban Development, Inc. Location: West of Strawberry Lane, 420 ft. south of Smithtown Rd. Benson opened the Public Hearing at 7:30 P.M. Nielsen presented the preliminary plat application. He said the City Council granted final plat approval for this development in September of 1990. At that time, the developer was unable to obtain a Letter of Credit and the final plat was not recorded with the County. The developer wants to reprocess the preliminary plat application. There have been no changes to the original plat. A letter of credit has been provided and the developer has signed a development agreement. Some preliminary grading was started on the 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 - PAGE 2 site without a permit, therefore, the applicant must pay an additional fee and post the letter of credit immediately. Nielsen noted a change to his July 2, 1990 recommendation. The Park dedication fee is now .$750 per lot. The applicant, North Suburban Development, had nothing further to add and there were no further comments. Benson closed the Public Hearing at 8:43 P.M. Commissioner Leslie said the initial application was made - before an engineering report was completed. Nielsen said the project does comply with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requirements. Commissioner Schultz asked if this project will eliminate flooding on Strawberry Lane. Nielsen said the developer has met his obligations; the development will not increase the runoff to Strawberry Lane. He said the area was identified as in need of a storm sewer in the 1970's. Leslie asked in which direction the water runs. Nielsen said the runoff starts at Church Road and continues down through the Strawberry Lane area to Lake Minnetonka. He said the ponds on the Project site are sized to accommodate the runoff from the property. Leslie moved, Schultz seconded to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Shorewood Suburban Estates subject to the conditions listed in the planning report plus requirement of $750 per lot park dedication fees. Motion carried - 4/0 2. 7:45 PUBLIC HEARING - C.U.P. - AUTOMOBILE SALES AND SERVICE OPERATION Applicant: Peter Brkovich, representing Apex Auto, Inc. Location: 5660 County Rd. 19 Benson opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 P.M. Nielsen presented the request for C.U.P. He said the applicant Proposes to open an auto sales and repair business at the site of the old Tom Thumb at 5660 County Rd. 19. The applicant- proposes to remodel the building to accommodate an office, small showroom and service area in the rear. Nielsen said the architectural appearance of the building will not change. The parking lot will be repaved the entrance from Cty. Rd. 19 will narrow, subject to Hennepin County approval and there will be curbing around the parking lot except for the area along Cty. Rd. 19. 1 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 - PAGE 3 He said the applicant proposes to collect water runoff at the northwest corner of the site and pipe it to the drainage ditch which occupies the north 40 feet of the site. The City Engineer recommends they use an oil skimming device. Nielsen said they may be able to make an arrangement with the American Legion to use their pond, if it is enlarged. Mr. Brkovich distributed a signage plan which proposed one wall sign and one pylon sign. He will have no banners or other outdoor signs, other than one temporary sign per year. Nielsen recommended granting the C.U.P. for one year and monitor the conditions stated in his memo of October 24, 1991. Don Keefe, K & D Properties said the applicant proposes on site ponding or joining with the American Legion to enlarge their pond. He said Mr. Brkovich will do a good fob. Bo Witrak - Minnetonka Country Club objected to the proposed auto service and sales business. He stated that the area already has two other businesses of this kind. He said the area is deteriorating because of the kinds of businesses allowed. Witrak stated that the Country Club is zoned R -1 and across the street it is zoned C -3. Keefe- objected. He said the proposed site is zoned C -3 and if the Proposal meets City requirements it should be approved. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:17 P.M. Benson said the site of the proposed Apex Auto, Inc. is zoned C -3 and the Country Club could apply for rezoning to C -3. He said he is not happy with another car sales and service center but the proposal seems to be a good approach. Schultz asked if the City is ready to intensely monitor this site. He said the Find site is still not complete. Nielsen said he was not aware of any problems at Find. He said Minnetonka Transmission and Moore's Auto are grandfathered. Schultz asked Brkovich how cars will enter his service center. Brkovich said they will drive around to the back. He can only accommodate 15 cars in the parking lot. Schultz asked why there will be no curbing along Hwy. 19. Nielsen said Hennepin County does not require it. Leslie asked Brkovich what will be his hours of operation. He said 9 A.M. to 7 P.M. Commissioner Rosenberger asked if he will do body work. Brkovich said he will do engine repair. Rosenberger asked who will provide the letter of credit. Keefe said it is undecided. Schultz said if there is customer parking in the rear there should be a door to access the front of the building. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 — PAGE 4 Rosenberger asked how many cars will be parked on the site; if there are 15 required spaces how many will.be for customers and employees. Brkovich said there will be no outdoor storage of cars. There is room for 6 cars in the repair center. Nielsen said there is a difference between storage of cars and sales of cars. Leslie asked Keefe what other interest he has had in this property. Keefe said there has been a variety of interest but nothing serious Schultz asked who has the C.U.P., the landowner or the user. Nielsen said, neither one, the C.U.P. goes with the property. Nielsen said the indoor display of cars is a permitted use of the property. The outdoor display of cars and the service of cars needs a C.U.P. Leslie asked Keefe if he has discussed the ponding proposal with the Legion. He said he has had preliminary discussions and they have been positive. Leslie asked if there will be improvements to the building. Keefe said it will be painted and repaired. Rosenberger said he would like to see more landscaping and no messages written on cars. Schultz moved, Leslie seconded to recommend the City Council approve the C.U.P. for Apex Auto, Inc. for one year subject to the Staff recommendations with enhanced landscaping, the satisfaction of Hennepin County requirements for curbing and outdoor storage should not exceed 24 hours. Motion carried - 4/0 3. 8:00 PUBLIC HEARING - C.U.P. TEMPORARY PARK SHELTER BUILDING Applicant: Shorewood Park Commission Location: Manor Park Benson opened the Public Hearing at 9:08 P.M. Nielsen said he originally requested this C.U.P. be issued for three years, however, it was approved for one year and was renewed last year for one year. He is requesting the C.U.P. be granted for two years. Nielsen said there is a Park Bond Referendum proposed for the spring, however, it is unlikely that a permanent shelter could be built in time for use in 1992. Nielsen suggested the Planning Commission recommend to the Park Commission that the Park Commission's Capital Improvement Plan 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 - PAGE 5 be modified to make the construction of a permanent warming house at Manor Park a top priority. Schultz asked Nielsen the cost for a permanent building. Nielsen said $20,000 to.$40,000. Schultz asked if the building can be built within the next year. Nielsen said most of the planned improvements will be done at Freeman Park. Schultz said, given the history of this warming house C.U.P., the Planning Commission should not recommend granting the C.U.P. or recommend granting it for one year with the condition that construction of a new building be a priority on the Park Capital Improvement Plan. Schultz moved, Benson seconded to recommend the City Council approve the C.U.P. for a temporary warming house at Manor Park for one year with the condition that the construction of a permanent warming house be the number one priority of the Park Capital Improvement Plan. Motion carried - 4/0. 4. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR. Paul Aubrecht, Radisson Rd., representing the Christmas Lake /Radisson Rd. Transportation Task Force, asked the Planning Commission to recommend the City Council advise the State to open the Old Market Road Intersection as planned. Aubrecht said a traffic study was done in 1984 and the intersection registered a level F which is a maximum reading. He said the reason Vine Hill is congested is the traffic from the Waterford area developments. He said this intersection has been justified and approved by Mn /DOT, the State and the City. He said it is an old issue which is not being solved. Aubrecht asked Nielsen how many homes will eventually be built in Waterford. Nielsen said there are now approximately 500 and 600 are proposed. Council Liaison Stover said the construction is now stopped. Benson asked if there will be a public meeting on the subject. Stover said the issue may be discussed at the Nov. 25th Council meeting. Benson said the Planning Commission should recommend the intersection not be tied to the Vine Hill Road construction and he would like the issue to be placed on the agenda for the 25th. Aubrecht said traffic counters should have been placed at Old Market Road and Covington to determine the real flow of traffic. Nielsen said he should write a letter to the City requesting to be on the Agenda when this topic is discussed. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 - PAGE 6 Aubrecht and Benson asked who was appointed to the Transportation Task Force and how the selection was done. Stover said the selection was done differently than other times. The Mayor sometimes appoints members with consultation by the Council or the entire Council appoints task force members. The Transportation Task Force was appointed by one Councilmember. Stover said Mn /DOT may not fund the intersection if the Transportation Task Force recommendations are adopted. She said the City Staff did not recommend the Task Force report. Nielsen said the staff made suggestions. Rosenberger said a Transportation Task Force should look at the entire City. Nielsen said this is done through the Comprehensive Plan. Leslie moved, Schultz seconded to recommend the City Council proceed with the opening of the Old Market Road intersection as quickly as Possible based on the Public Hearing of five years ago and the studies and research done for the project. Motion carried - 4/0 5. REPORTS Stover informed the Commission that one of the Trivesco partners did attend the Council meeting and objected to the Transportation Task Force recommendations. She said the applicants for the Planning Commission are as follows: 1. Deborah Borkin 2. Tim Ryan 3. Doug Malam 4. Robert Bean 5. Jack Hanson 6. Jerry Goodlin The Council will consider these applications on Nov. 12th. Stover informed the Commission that their recommendations are now on the Consent Agenda. Rosenberger asked about the Salt /Sand Shed. Stover said it will now be done in the spring. Leslie said she would like to commend the Public Works Department for their excellent plowing of the streets. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1991 - PAGE 7 6. ADJOURNMENT Schultz moved, Leslie seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:14 P.M. Motion carried - 4/0 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Katie Snyder Recording Secretary 7