042291 CC Reg AgP
'-
i
.. ------...
~
"'
c_.
. i
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, APRIL 22, 1991
SHOREWOOD CITY HALL
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B.
Roll Call
Daugherty_ ..
Lewis_
Mayor Brancel_
Gagne_
Stover_
C. Review Agenda
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting - April 8, 1991
(Att. No. 2A - Minutes)
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Gambling License - American Legion
(Att. No. 3A-1 - License Application)
(Att. No. 3A-2 - Proposed Resolution)
B. Reissue Council Check - J an Haugen
(Att. No. 3B - Finance Director' s Memo)
4. PARK COMMISSION REPORT
5. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
6. FINDINGS OF FACT - MASON VARIANCE
(Att. No.6 - Proposed Resolution)
7. PRELIMINARY PLAT - JOHNSON'S FIRST ADDmON
Applicant:
Location:
Ron Johnson
West side of Vine Hill Road, between Shady
Hills and Waterford
(Att. No. 7A - Planner's Memo)
(Att. No. 7B - Planner's Memo)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 22, 1991
Page two
8. 7:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDER ORDERING OF
IMPROVEMENT/ORDER PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS -
GLEN ROAD DRAINAGE PROJECT
(Att. No.8 - Finance Director's Memo)
9. 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINO - CONSIDER ORDERING OF
IMPROVEMENT/ORDER PREPA~TION OF PLAt{S AND ~PECIFICATIONS-
PINE BEND WATERMAIN EXTENSION
(Att. No. 9A - Finance Director's Memo)
(Att. No. 9B - Proposed Resolution)
10. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS/DIRECT NOTICE TO BIDDERS-
OLD MARKET ROAD INTERSECTION (plans and Specifications Available for
Review at City Hall)
(Att. No. 10 - Proposed Resolution)
11. APPROVE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACT
(Att. No. 11 - Proposed Contract)
12. REQUEST FOR FUNDING - POLICE SERVICES FOR 4TH OF JULY
CELEBRATION
(Att. No. 12 - Excelsior Request Letter)
13. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
14. STAFF REPORTS
A. Attorney's Report
1.
2.
B. Engineer's Report
1.
2.
C. Planning Director's Report
1. Spring Cleanup
2. Landscape Plan Cost Estimate - S.E. Area Water Treatment Plant
3. ~~ 27A1'a,(;;.~:.;:C-~;k~~t~A~
.
CITY COUNCn... AGENDA
APRIL 22, 1991
Page three
15. COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Mayor Brancel
B. Councilmembers
16. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF THE CLAIMS APPROVED
(Att. No. 16 - Claims List)
-
t
.
. - - ...
EXECU~S~Y
SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
22 APRIL 1991
Following are very brief summaries of the items listed on the above-referenced agenda. For
more detail please refer to the individual staff reports contained in the Council information
packet.
Item 3A. The American Legion has applied for their annual gambling license. Shorewood
issues such licenses to charitable organizations, pursuant to Chapter 301 of the City Code.
The application must also go to the State and requires a resolution to be approved by the
City. bjn
Item 3B. Former Mayor Haugen has requested that the City reissue an old Council
paycheck which had been misplaced for a number of years. The check had been cancelled
and the money deposited to the general fund. The Finance Director recommends reissuing
the check. ajr
Item 6. Based upon the Council's direction at the last meeting, the City Attorney has
prepared findings of fact denying a setback variance and variance to expand a nonconforming
use of property requested by Herb Mason. The structure in question had been built without
a permit. bjn
Item 7. Ron Johnson proposes to plat three lots which will front on Waterford Circle. Staff
has stressed the importance of ensuring that homes built on these lots be consistent with the
existing homes on the street. While the applicant agrees to conditions similar to the
restrictions which exist for homes in Waterford, he objects to being subject to Waterford's
architectural review committee. Understandably, residents on Waterford Circle want
assurance that their property values will be protected. The Planning Commission
recommends that the preliminary plat be approved, subject to a number of conditions, one of
which is that the new lots be subject to the same covenants and restrictions that exist for
Waterford. bjn
Item 8. The original feasibility report for this project was completed in August 1990 and
included resident feedback regarding tree removal and dredging as suggested by the MWCD.
The updated Feasibility Report presented March 25, 1991 reduces the scope of the project
and construction costs from $150,000 to $107,000 with funding proposed through a special
taxing district. However, needed easement acquisition could add up to $250,000 to the total
project cost. jad
#
.
.
Executive Summary - Council Packet
22 April 1991
Page two
Item 9. The Feasibility Report presented March 25, 1991 contains several options for the
extension of city water into the Pine Bend area. These options range in scope from the
lowest initial cost to the most advantageous from an engineering and maintenance standpoint.
Total project costs are estimated from $77,000 to $121,000 with funding proposed from both
the 1991 street maintenance budget and special assessments. jad
Item 10. In addition to the plans and specifications, the City Engineer will have a display
prepared to show the layout and features of the Old Market Road Intersection Project. These
plans contain many items of interest to the Council, including signage and traffic control,
watermain extensions, and funding alternatives. Acceptance of the plan is necessary to bring
bids back to the Council prior to the June 1, 1991 deadline. jad
Item 11. Based upon issues which arose during the past year, the Park Commission
secretary has proposed certain revisions to the contract between various athletic organizations
and who wish to use the park facilities and the City. The revisions have been reviewed by
the City Attorney. bjn
Item 12. Like other cities, Excelsior is experiencing budgetary problems. In an effort to
curb expenses, they have suggested that other cities share more of the additional expense for
police services associtated with the annual Excelsior 4th of July Celebration. From
information provided by Excelsior's Manager, it appears that they are suggesting that
Shorewood's share of the cost would be $2617. We have budgeted $1000 for donation to the
Excelsior Chamber of Commerce for the fireworks for 1991. bjn
Item 14C-2. Upon the Council's direction at the last meeting we have obtained an estimate
from the Park Planning Consultant to prepare a landscape plan for the S.E. Area Water
Treatment Plant. He proposes that the plan would cost between $800 and $1000, and could
be completed by 1 May. bjn
LG214
(111T4J!lO)
.
.
FOR BOARD USE ONLY
FEE
CHECK
INIT1ALS
DATE
Minnesota LaJJJfu.L Gambling
Premise Permit Application - Part 1
Legal Name of Organization .0 ""\
(' L-A ,t..lE>VC-G" tLo PCK- TC.sr c1.S<-r
Business Address of Organization - Street or P. 0 Box (00 not use address of gambling manager)
;Z t.; L( .JO .5(/'1,'ll r 1-170 t^-J 1\/ ~ b I
City State Zip Code County
t=X CIE L6 /0 R... /1-'1 N. ...r-S::-:;: 3 / )-/ EAlrJ;;; PI N
Name of chief exectJ~e 9fficer (cannot be gambling manager) Title .
A LL/ E Rfr, k' fuJ136 i?- f:- eel.Vlr,/[ ,4JJ b ~R-.
Address:ot-chiet executive officer - Street or P. O. Box
)1 &, 0 e IA- /cekiJ r< n
City State Zip Coce Cou~rx
e 'i- C.e L- '5 ( 0 r2 J\''l 1'0 C; -r "3 =i \ N-e...;t i1 e.p I J.J
Business phone number
Ihf)J /.;7'1-3 9?;L
Business phone number
(G (:f.) w ~ ~ -&9?1
,
Class of Premise Permit
~ Class A - Bingo, Raffles, Paddfewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs
o Class B - Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs
o Class C - Bingo only
o Class D - Raffles only
Fee
$200
$125
$100
$75
The class of premise permit
must be reflected by class of
the organization license.
Bingo Occasions
If class A or C. fill in days and beginning and ending hours of bingo occasions:
No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by an or!!:anization per week.
Day
Beginning/Ending Hours
Day
Beginning/Ending Hours
Day Beginning lEnding Hours
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Status of Premise Permit - check one:
o New premise - Fill in base organization premise permit number
IX! Renewal of existing premise permit - Fii! in como/ete premise permit number P - c Co' :; :.:: r - DC i
o Previously expired premise permit - Fill in comolete premise permit number
3A- ,
LG2.14
.
.
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Premise Permit Application - Part 2
i~r~::';~iiffl~ijt~;lr:!:::!:&;:;:;iitiffimilllllaE*1;1I.m;.wili};!lm~~~~!I~f:~!~~1~1%1@M!t.lf,ttlim}'i'l4.~li~!!~~~j.
. Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted
C.LJ'f ~EENC-6 fLcf"~R.. POSt-ZrCJ
Is the premises located within city limits? Ci yes 0 no
Street Address (do not use a post office box number)
..,7t;'1,ro SI".-117117CuftJ . ~!J,
City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises is located if outside of
I
city fimits
.:5/-10 R.rE Woe b
Name and Address of legal Owner of Premises
City
flt:vJNG" P ItV
Slate
Zip Code
CLA t~ "C G.. Ds-r.;;zS9 ,j..t; L,lSO .:5/N {, c {,-I :
Does the organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? ~ YES
.,J-L"SS/
NOTE: Organizations may not pay themselves rent if they own the building or have a holding company. A letter must be sub-
mitted showing rent payments as zero from gambling funds if the organjzation's holding company owns the premises. The
letter must be signed by the chief executive officer.)
If NO, attach the following:
· a copy of the lease with terms for one year.
* a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions. showing what portion is being leased.
A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applicantions.
Rent:
For gambling with bingo $
Total square footage leased
For gambling without bingo $
Total square footage leased
Address of storage space of gambling equipment
Address City State Zip code
,.J.u Ll.sD _:ti'.rll ::t./TOLU A..\ KOt t::V C~ 1-:::': i c,!( /l,,{IJ I -.r ..["33' i
Ilyy~tr#m;l;::l~{.~~If:~!!i~~~~~!t~~:~~:::~~~~~~~i~!~:~~t!~~:~ji~~::~:~i~~i!~:~:~~~l~:H~~~~~~~~~:!~~~~~t~~~~~:~~!~I@~~:~~~:~~:~~~:~~:~~~~~~~iili!l~~fI~~~:~l~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~::f~~~~~~~~~~:~~!~i:~~~!~~
~H:~~~~~!~~~~~l~!~t~~~~~:~~~)~f:~~~~~j::~~!~j@~f:!@lt~~~~::i::~~i!~~~~f~~~t~t~jjjj!!::~f:l~~~!!~~:j!~~~i~:~f~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~it:f.
(each permitted gambling premises must have a separate checking account)
Bank Name Bank Account Number
, J""\ '. L
}JO/C,L\..i8t tjAN;( 01el/77
Bank Address City State Zip Code
4/1 UJ.JJ-rSR. -sr C:'>I.(,~L<;/[,(2 I\..L~(
Name, address, and title of persons authorized to sign checks and make deposits and withdrawals.
....- .
.s:-,j 3...-;; I
Name
~fl;I~-S- L PeT€~()(V:
Address
fllle
Jc (),)ocjJi....'~:,J/J A rJ. . cKCt.=wror2.., 14:""-'" ..rT-::':.:?I
.', , I . - ')
&~4/tll ,J& /"" f:ic...,
LG214
.
.
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Premise Permit Application - Part 3
l~ggmf.iggmf.m~wfilji~~~~~~iflilrwl~ill.llii11f,lJii.li[~$li~f~ftilt~~$~millrnl..~ii!
Gambling Site Authorization
I heari:ly consent that local law enforcement officers, the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of revenue or
public safety, or agents of the commissioners, may enter the premises to enforce the law.
Bank Records Information
The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill
requirements of current gambling rules and law.
I dedare that:
I have read this application and all information submitted to the board;
All information is true, accurate and complete;
All other required information has been fully disclosed;
I am the chief executive officer of the organization;
I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful gambling and rules of the board and agree, if licensed,
to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to them;
A membership list of the organization will be available within seven days after it is requested by the board;
Any changes in application information will be submitted to the board and local government within 10
days of the change; and
A termination plan will be submitted to the board within 15 days of the termination of all premise permits.
Failure to provide required information or providing false information may result in the denial or revocation of the
license.
Signature or~ief ex~tive officer / /. " /~
Llieu /' v-&J(r;JLv:; {<!jQ~)/ /1, I f'-~
Date
1. The city '"must sign if the gambling premises is located within city limits.
2. The county -AND township'". must sign if the gambling premises is located within a township.
3. The local government (city or county) must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the application.
4. A copy of the resolution approving the application must be attached to the application.
5. Applications which are denied by the local goveming body should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Division.
Township: By signature below, the township acknowledges that the organization is applying for a premises permit within
township limits.
City- or County-
Township- .
City or County Name
Date Received
Date Received
Signature of person receiving application
Tide
o Unincorporated
Refer to the instructions for the required attachments Mail to:
Department of Gaming
Gambling Control Division
Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor
1711 W. County Road B
Roseville, MN 55113
.
. 4/17/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING GAMBLING LICENSE
WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Code, Chapter 301, provides for the
licensing of certain gambling activities in the City~ and
WH ERE AS, said code prescribes certain restrictions concerning
eligibility for such licensing and application, whereby the licensee will
save the City harmless for all claims arising out of the granting of such
license ~ and
WHEREAS, the following applicant has met the eligibility
requirement for such license and has agreed to all terms and conditions of
the agreement contained in the license.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
1. That a license for the conduct of gambling as specified in
the terms and conditions of the license, be issued for a term of one year,
from , 1991, to , 1992, to the following
applicant:
A pplicant Name
Address
American Legion, Post #259
24450 Smithtown Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
22nd day of April, 1991.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Bradley J. Nielsen
Acting City Administrator/Clerk
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes -
Nays -
3A .. 2-
.
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Bob Gagne
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
AL ROLEK ~
DATE:
APRIL 17, 1991
RE:
REQUEST FROM JAN HAUGEN TO REISSUE CANCELED CHECK
I received a call from Jan Haugen regarding an uncashed council pay
check. The check, issued to her in 1980 in the amount of $100.00,
was found as she was going though some of her papers.
It was found, after researching the records, that the check had
been canceled by the City and had never been reissued. Jan is
requesting that the check be reissued to her.
Inasmuch as the check has never been cashed, and the City has since
changed its depository, it is recommended that a replacement check
be issued to Jan Haugen in the amount of $100.00.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
03
-w:-....."
APR 18 '91 13:19
.
.
P.2/3
4/17/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO
HERBERT MASON
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GAZEBO
WHEREAS, Herbert Mason (Applicant) has constructed a 12 foot by 12
foot gazebo without a building permit on the west side of his home on his
property located at 27010 Edge'Wood Road in the City of Shorewood, County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS; said gazebo was constructed in such manner and location
that it does not comply with the side-yard setback requirements of the
Shorewood Zoning Code, and Applicant therefore requires a setback variance in
order to maintain the gazebo in its present location; and
WHEREAS, there already exists two single-family dwellings on the
property which do not comply with the use requirements of the Shorewood
Zoning Code and, therefore, are existing as a non-conforming use of the
property; and
WHEREAS, Applicant has made application for a variance to permit the
expansion of an existing non-conforming use of the property to permit the
additional use of the property for a gazebo; and
WHEREAS, a pUblic hearing was held and the application reviewed by
the Planning Commission, and, after due deliberation and review, the Planning
Commission recommended denial of the variances; and
WHEREAS, a further review of the application was had before the City
Council at their regular meeting held on 8 April 1991, at which time the
Planning Commission recommendations were reviewed and reports received from
the City Planner and City Attorney; and
WHEREAS, atter due deliberation and a review ot the criteria
required for the granting of variances, the city Council directed the City
A ttorney to prepare a resolution setting forth Findings and Conclusions
denying Applicantls application for the requested variances.
NOv.T, THEREFO RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the subject property is located in an R-1C, single-fam11y
residential zoning district and 1s also subject to the requirements of the S,
Shoreland (overlay) district.
(a
APR 18 '91 13:20
P.3/3
.
.
2. That the R-1C zoning district requires a side-yard setback of 20
feet whereas Applicant's gazebo is presently constructed within 17 1/2 feet
of the Vlesterly side yard lot line.
3. That Shorewood City Code Section 1201.03, Subd. 2.c. (4),
specifically limits the use of a residential lot to one principal building.
4. That Applicant's property is presently occupied by two principal
buildings and therefore constitutes a non-conforming use of the property.
5. That the use of the property for a gazebo would be an expansion
of a non-conforming use of the property.
6. That the Shorewood Zoning Code makes no provision for the
expansion of a non-conforming use of residential property, and further
provides that is the intent of the Code is that all non-conforming uses shall
be eventually brought into conformity.
7. That Applicant neglected to a.pply for a bullding permit for the
construction of the gazebo prior to its construction and that said gazebo
therefore constitutes an illegal structure on the property.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the the variances requested by the Applicant constitute a
substantial deviation from the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code.
2. That the property can be put to a reasonable use, and, in fact,
already has been put to a reasonable use without the construction of the
gazebo on the lot.
3. That the present plight of the Applicant concerning the
illegally constructed gazebo is due to circumstances created by the Applicant
and is not a result of circumstances unique to the property.
4. That the Applicant has not met the criteria for the grant of a
variance under Section 1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has not
established an undue hardship as defined by Minn. Stat. Section 462..357,
Subd. 6(2).
5. That Applicant's request for the variances set forth above are
hereby denied.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
22nd day of April, 1991.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Bradley J. Nielsen
Acting City Administrator/Clerk
Roll Call Votes
Ayes -
Nays -
.
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Kristi Stover
Bob Gagne
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Brad Nielsen
DATE:
18 April 1991
RE:
Johnson's First Addition
FILE NO.
405 (91.07)
In reviewing the preliminary plat for Johnson's First Addition, the Planning Commission
recommended that this plat should be subject to the same protective covenants which apply to
Waterford, including having Trivesco serve as the architectural review committee. In the
attached letter, dated 8 April 1991, from John Bonner, the applicant's attorney, he states his
concerns with having Trivesco serve in this capacity. His letter also proposes a compromise
solution. He suggests having Trivesco review the plans, but if they disapprove an
independent architect would serve as an arbitrator.
The City Attorney and I met with Mr. Bonner to discuss this proposal. Our concern with the
way it is stated in the letter is that one individual would have veto power over three,
defeating the purpose of having a committee in the first place. It was finally suggested that
the compromise may be acceptable if Trivesco and Johnson both selected independent
architects to arbitrate in the event plans were denied. This alternative is elaborated on in a
letter from Mr. Bonner, dated 18 April. The mechanics for this type of arrangement can be
formalized in the development agreement which is recommended for this plat.
If you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact me or Glenn prior to Monday
night's meeting.
cc: Glenn Froberg
John Bonner
Jerry Kenline
Randy Travalia
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
15
. .
g&~ ~ &~
~aCk
A PROFESSIONAL AsSOCIATION lNCORPOllATED
i\s JOa..., F. BONNER m. PA
JOa..., F. BONNER 1889-1963
JOHN F. BONNER. JlL. RETIRED
JOHN F. BONNER m
BRIAN R. MABTENS
MARK W. PEERY
April 8, 1991
74~ PAllK PLACE OFFICE GENTER
~77~ WAY'ZATA BOULEVARD
M:INNEAJ>OLIS. MINNESOTA ~:5416
TELEPHONE (612) :542-8622
FAX (612) ~42-1701
Mr. Brad Nielsen
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: Johnson's First Addition Preliminary Plat
Dear Brad:
After the Tuesday night meeting I had an opportunity to meet with Ron
to discuss the possibility of arriving at a compromise position with
respect to the issues regarding our participation in the Waterford
Homeowners Association and its Architectural Review Committee. I have
a proposal which I believe may be acceptable.
First, however, I must state my disappointment over the rather
inflexible and uncooperative attitudes displayed by our neighbors at
the planning commission meeting. As you know, we have indicated a
willingness to attempt to accommodate both the residents concerns and
our own but, when one member of the planning commission asked whether
or not the neighbors would be willing to work with us to arrive at a
solution, the residents flatly refused, stating that it was "our
problem." This, of course, places us in a difficult position. We
would like to arrive at a reasonable solution which addresses my
client's fears that Trivesco might, as a competitor, choose to unreaso-
nably block development of our lots as well as the possibility that
once Waterford is completely built, the Architectural Review
Committee would consist only of residents and not professionals.
While I have not developed any final language with respect to the pro-
posal I have Mr. Johnson's authority to propose a concept which may
serve as a basis for a compromise. We propose that the development
plans would be submitted initially to the Architectural Review
Committee and if the plans were approved no further approvals would be
necessary. However, in the event the Architectural Review Committee
chose not to approve the plans an independent architect would be
selected to conduct a review whose decision would be final and
.
.
Mr. Brad Nielsen
April 8, 1991
Page 2
binding. This should give the existing residents some comfort and
additionally I believe it will assist my client or any future builder
in avoiding litigation over matters which deal exclusively with
aesthetic concerns.
I should mention that so far as I can determine from my review of the
Ordinance, the City has no right whatsoever to impose a requirement
that we adopt restrictive covenants as a condition of approving the
plat.
You have
pared by
my authority to include this
you for the City Council.
,/~
" Ver r
letter with the package pre-
JFB : pg
cc: Ronald R. Johnson
. .
Y8~ ~ ~
~d~
A PROPESSIONAL AsSOGIATION mGORPORATED
As JOHN F. BONNER m. P.A.
JOHN F. BONNER 1889-1963
JOHN F. BONNER, JR., RETIRED
JOHN F. BONNER III
BRIAN R. MARTENS
MARx W. PEERY
April 18, 1991
74~ PARK PLACE OPFIGE GENTER
~77~ WAYZATA BOUl.EVARD
MINNEAPOLJ:S, MINNESOTA ~~416
TELEPHONE (612) ~42-8622
FAX (612) ~42-1701
Mr. Brad Nielsen
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood, MN 55331
RE: Johnson ~ Property
Dear Brad:
Since our meeting Monday evening I have not had an opportunity to
finalize documentation regarding the proposed covenants and restric-
tions to be imposed regarding the above-captioned plat.
However, I want the council to have an idea as to the types of
restrictions we felt would be acceptable to my client so that they
could at least consider these on a conceptual basis preparatory to the
meeting scheduled for April 22, 1991.
First, we are still prepared to go forward with a proposal that the
property be subjected to the Waterford covenants and that the purcha-
sers of the property belong to the Waterford group after the plans and
specifications for construction of the home are approved. This of
course would be subject to the agreement or approval of the Waterford
group. I doubt that we could automatically join that group by simply
electing to do so.
Prior to construction of the home on any site, a buyer or builder
would be required to initially submit the plans and specifications to
Trivesco for their review. If Trivesco approved of the plans nothing
further would be required. However, if Trivesco did not approve the
plans or, if Trivesco no longer comprised the Waterford Architectural
Control Committee, the plans would be subject to review and approval
as follows:
A. My client would designate within five days an architect to
review the plan. Trivesco or the Architectural Control Committee
would select an architect within five days. Those architects would
meet and, if the two of them agreed that the plans and specifications
called for construction of a dwelling which was architecturally com-
patible or
.
.
Mr. Brad Nielsen
April 18, 1991
Page 2
alternatively not architecturally compatible, their decision would be
binding on all parties. If however they were not able to agree, they
would appoint a single architect whose decision regarding the plans
would be final and binding on the parties.
While I do not relish the thought of subjecting anyone to these
requirements, I feel in view of the concerns expressed they are a
reasonable way of accommodating our neighbors.
I wish however to reiterate the fact that we do not believe that such
restrictions could be legally required as a condition of the platting
under the current ordinance.
With respect to the balance of the issues addressed by my separate
letter to you I believe they can be covered in conjunction with the
drafting of language on a proposed development agreement. I simply
wish to make certain that Mr. Johnson has adequate protection with
respect to the property so that we do not find ourselves confronted
with the claim that we had agreed to matters which we did not intend
to agree to.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
cc: Ronald R. Johnson
yours,
JFB:pg
.
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCIL
Kristi Stover
Bob Gagne
Rob Daugherty
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
MEMO
TO:
MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM:
AL ROLEK
DATE:
APRIL 15, 1991
RE:
PER PARCEL COSTS FOR GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 STORMWATER
IMPROVEMENTS
The stormwater improvements proposed for the Glen Road/County Road
19 area is projected to cost $307,000 to complete. This cost
includes the actual construction costs, indirect costs such as
engineering, administration, financing, etc., and easement
acquisition costs.
A special taxing district has been established to pay for the
improvement. Under this arrangement, all 41 parcels within the
district boundaries will share in the cost of the improvement on an
ad valorem basis. Those properties having the highest tax
capacities will pay more for the improvements than those having
lower tax capacities. The cost per $1,000 in tax capacity is
$3,298.24.
I have estimated the cost per parcel and the annual payment at a
7.5% interest rate, with 5% coverage, over ten and fifteen year
periods to give an idea of total costs. A spreadsheet is attached
which shows these estimates for all parcels in the district. The
per parcel costs range from $570.60 on the low end to $ 71,627.83
on the high end. The following is an at-a-glance comparison of the
cost to homestead properties having estimated market values of
$100,000, $150,000 and $200,000:
Estimated Tax Estimated Annual Cost Annual Cost
Market Value capacity Tax Over 10 Years Over 15 Years
$100,000 $1,320 $ 4,353.66 $ 665.98 $ 517.90
150,000 2,720 8,971.21 1,372.33 1,067.19
200,000 4,220 13,918,57 2,129.13 1,655.72
It has been assumed that the city would have to purchase easements
for this project. Although some of the tax amounts for the project
are large, some will be offset by the payments for easement
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
9
.
.
MEMO
GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
APRIL 15, 1991
PAGE 2
acquisition. The square footage of the easements which are to be
acquired appear in the final column on the attached spreadsheet.
If the easements were acquired at no cost, then the cost of the
project would be reduced by approximately 2/3 and the estimated tax
amounts would be reduced accordingly.
This should present a good summary of the expected per parcel
costs. Should you have any questions, please give me a call.
TAXPAYER
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 133
STEVEN PAHL
JAMES QUAST
DONOVAN MESSENGER
~AUL HIRSCH
AMERICAN LEGION 259
DONALD KEEFE
AMERICAN LEGION 259
ROGER & FAYE FEMRITE
RICHARD MOORE
AM:RICAN LEGION 259
MILES DEVELOPMENT, INC.
~ATHERINE HOUCK
JOHN PLONSKE/JANE RIVERS
TOWNE ADDITION
JOHN FRANGIPANE
J. KESSLER
MIC~AEL & THERESA ZERBY
SRIAN & RHONDA MAGHAN
STEVEN & SANDRA SLOM
ROBT. & BETTY LOU DORWEILER
VINCENT BURNHART
MIC~AEL & MELISSA FOSTER
C. EDGERLY & S. JONES
LLOYD & JANE HARNS
WESTWOOD 3RD ADDITION
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NO.1
GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COSTS BY PARCEL
APRIL 15, 1991
PARCEL ID NO.
LOT
33-117-23-24-0006 19
33-117-23-24-0007 PART OF 20
33-117-23-13-0003 23
33-117-23-13-0004 24
33-117-23-13-0006 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0007 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0008 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0009 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0010 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0011 PART OF 25
33-117-23-13-0012 26
33-117-23-13-0018 PART OF 22
33-117-23-13-0019 PART OF 22
33-117-23-13-0020 1
33-117-23-13-0021 2
33-117-23-13-0022 3
33-117-23-13-0023 4
33-117-23-13-0024 5
33-117-23-13-0025 6
33-117-23-13-0026 7
33-117-23-13-0027 8
33-117-23-13-0028 9
33-117-23-13-0029 10
ROBT. & ANNA GARDNER 33-1 7-23-24-0022 7
CHARLES & SALLY CARLSON 33-1 7-23-24-0028 2
ROGER & SUSAN CHAMPA 33-1 7-23-24-0029 3
3ERNARD & AMEROGENE EISENREICH 33-1 7-23-24-0030 4
ALLAN & DEBRA VANDERLINDE 33-1 7-23-24-0031 5
:1ANITOU GLEN
)AVID LITTLEFIELD
'RED LIVINGSTON
JESRA ROSS
:ANDRA VAN DERVEER
~r. ~ELLOWSHIP OF UNITARI NS
~K FELLOWSHIP OF UNITARI NS
LK FELLOWSHIP O~ UNITARI NS
SHOREWOOD OAKS PARTNERSH P
:HaQEWOOD OAKS PARTNERSH P
DANIEL BARTUS
JOHN & SANDRA MILLER
JOGER FISCHBACH
JAMES CADA/SUSANNE eADA
33-1 7-23-12-0023 14 & 15
33-1 7-23-12-0024 16
33-1 7-23-12-0025 17 & 18
33-1 7-23-12-0026 19
33-1 7-23-12-0027 20
33-1 7-23-12-0028 21
33-1 7-23-12-0029 22
33-1 7-23-12-0030 PART OF 23
33-1 7-23-12-0031 PART OF 24
33-1 7-23-12-0032 PART OF 24
33-1 7-23-21-0028 10
33-1 7-23-21-0029 11
33-1 7-23-21-0030 12 & 13
. TOTAL
TAX % OF ESTIMATED
BLOCK CAPACITY TAX CAP. TAX
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
ANNUAL COST ANNUAL COST
W/5% COVER W/5% COVER EASEMENT
OVER 10 YRS OVER 15 YRS SQUARE
@ 7.5% INT @ 7.5% INT FOOTAGE
802 0.8616 2,645.19 404.64 314.67
750 0.8058 2,473.68 378.40 294.26
635 0.6822 2,094.38 320.38 249.14
852 0.9153 2,810.10 429.86 334.28
4,596 4.9377 15,158.70 2,318.84 1,803.24
4,903 5.2675 16,171.26 2,473.73 1,923.70
1,079 1.1592 3,558.80 544.39 423.35
2,732 2.9351 9,010.79 1,378.39 1,071.90
2,957 3.1768 9,752.89 1,491.91 1,160.18
648 0.6962 2,137.26 326.94 254.24
4,563 4.9022 15,049.86 2,302.19 1,790.30
1,078 1.1581 3,555.50 543.89 422.95
1,601 1.7200 5,280.48 807.76 628.15
1,332 1.4310 4,393.25 672.04 522.61
2,527 2.7149 8,334.65 1,274.96 991. 47
173 0.1859 570.60 87.28 67.88
1,933 2.1358 6,556.90 1,003.01 779.99
177 0.1859 570.60 87.28 67.88
..v
173 0.1859 570.60 87.28 67.88
4,512 4.8474 14,881.65 2,276.46 1,770.29
400 0.4297 1,319.30 201.81 156.94
1,440 1. 5471 4,749.46 726.53 564.98
1,476 1. 5857 4,868.20 744.69 579.11
2,552 2.7417 8,417.10 1,287.57 1,001.28
1,233 1.3247 4,066.73 622.09 483.77
3,857 4.1437 12,721.30 1,945.99 1,513.30
2,090 2.2454 6,893.32 1,054.48 820.01
1,233 1.3247 4,066.73 622.09 483.77
5,376
6,700
65,688
2,625
3,314 3.5604 10,930.36 1,672.02 1,300.25 18,487
1,790 1. 9231 5,903.85 903.12 702.31 18,974
2,681 2.8803 8,842.58 1,352.65 1,051.89 24,974
1,156 1.2419 3,812.76 583.24 453.56 3,500
* 1,869 ') ~~q~ 6,164.41 942.97 733.30
1... ... 'J__ '.,;
* 600 0.6446 1,978.94 302.72 2.35.41 62,073
t 450 0.4835 1,484.21 227.04 176.56
0 0.0097 29.68 4.54 3.53 6,784
21,708 23.3219 71,598.15 10,952.42 8,517.15 45,607
3,388 3.6399 11,174.43 1,709.36 1,329.28
1,032 1.1 087 3,403.78 520.68 404.91 7,500
1,330 1. 4289 4,386.66 671. 03 521. 83 6,750
1,398 1. SO 19 4,610.94 705.34 548.51 8,000
--------..-----------------------------------------------------
93,080 100 307,000 46,962 36,520 283,038
* EXEMPT FOR TAX PURPOSES - VALUES SUPPLIED BY CITY ASSESSOR
.
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCI L
Krist; Stover
Bob Gagne
Rob DaughertY
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
MEMO
TO:
MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM:
AL ROLEK
DATE:
APRIL 15, 1991
PROJECTED ASSESSMENTS FOR PINE BEND WATERMAIN EXTENSION
RE:
The City Engineer, in his feasibility study, presents three options
for constructing the watermain extension on pine Bend Road and
corresponding cost estimates for each. The cost of one of the
options, represented by Cost Estimate A, appears to be prohibitive.
The other two options seem to be workable, as well as the more
affordable, options.
The project cost for each option is proposed to be spread equally
against the benefitted properties. The costlier of the two
options, represented by Cost Estimate B, includes bringing the road
up to an urban section specification and involves a larger
contribution of City road funds to build. The City Engineer feels
that since this would upgrade the quality of the road, the project
could be financed over a 15 year period. Cost Estimate C would
restore the existing road and include an overlay of bituminous
material. This option is less costly; however, since there is no
permanent road improvement, the project would probably be financed
over 10 years.
The following is a table of the estimated assessment amount for
each option and the average annual payment amount, assuming a 7.5%
interest rate with 5% coverage:
Estimated Annual Payment Annual Payment
Assessment Over 10 Years Over 15 Years
option B $5,701 $872 $678
Option C $4,843 $741
Should you have any questions regarding these figures, please call
me.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
911
,.,."~""..,...."",,.._-~-' ,---_.
.
.
4/17/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PINE BEND WATERMAIN EXTENSION
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 32-91 of the City Council, adopted on the
25th day of March, 1991, fixed the 22nd day of April, 1991, as the date for a
public hearing on the following construction of a local improvement known as
Pine Bend Watermain Extension; and
WHEREAS, all property owners whose properties are liable to be
assessed for the making of this improvement were given notice, ten days'
published notice of the Council hearing was given through two weekly
publications of the required notice in the newspaper, and the hearing was
duly held on the 22nd day of April, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Shorewood that:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in Council
Resolution No. 32-91 adopted March 25, 1991.
2. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates is hereby designated as the
engineer for this improvement and shall prepare plans and specifications for
the construction of said improvement.
3. It is hereby determined that this improvement is not related to
the City's Comprehensive Plan and need not be referred to the Planning
Commission.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this
22nd day of April, 1991.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Bradley J. Nielsen
Acting City Administrator/Clerk
Roll Call Vote:
A yes -
Nays -
qf)
.
.
4/17/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STREET AND
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
WATERFORO III ADDITION - OLD MARKET ROAD
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 113-90, adopted by the City
Council on the 18th day of October, 1990, the City Engineer has prepared
plans and specifications for the construction of a local improvement known as
Street and Watermain Improvements for Waterford III Addition - Old Market
Road and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Shorewood as follows:
1. T hat such plans and specifications, copies of which are attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. That the City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official newspaper and in "c onstruction Bulletin" an advertisement for
bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published for one day, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the
Clerk until a. m., on May _, 1991, at which time they will be
publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk
and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council
at p. m. on May _, 1991, in the Council Chambers, and that no bids
will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by
a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the
Clerk for five per cent (5%) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this
22nd day of April, 1991.
Barbara J. Brancel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Bradley J. Nielsen
Acting City Administrator/Clerk
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes -
Nays -
/0
~
.
.
MAYOR
Barb Brancel
COUNCl L
Kristi Stover
Bob Gagne
Rob DaughertY
Daniel Lewis
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
SOE NICCUM
DATE:
APRIL 10, 1991
RE:
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACT
Requesting change in Liability Insurance Policy
Requirement from $1,000,000 to $500,000
In the last two days I have talked to South Tonka Little League,
and Todd Strot of the Men I s Slow pitch League. Our original
contract asked for a liability insurance policy in the amount of
$1,000,000. These organizations have trouble handling this amount.
I remember last year we had difficulty with this. I asked Attorney
Froberg if we had to have this amount. He suggested contacting our
insurance agent, and having the agent recommend an amount.
I talked to Finance Director Rolek. Rolek said he felt $1,000,000
was very high. He contacted Ken Jarcho. Jarcho recommended at
least $500,000.
Some of these teams begin playing April 27. I have sent the
contracts out with the $500,000. figure listed, and a note stating
that the amount will be reviewed by the City Council at their
meeting of Monday, April 22, and may be changed.
1/
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
..
.
.
C:\FORMS\CONTRACT.ATB
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
ANNUAL ATHLETIC FACILITIES MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT
THIS MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ____ day of , 1991,
by and between the , hereinafter called "Athletic Association", and the
City of Shorewood, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City";
1. The City agrees to provide to the Athletic Association the exclusive use of the facilities
located at (the facilities) for those dates and times
specifically set forth in the schedule approved by the City Council.
CITY OF SHOREwOOD
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
By:
By:
By:
By:
.
.
CITY OF EXCELSIOR
339 THIRD STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331
TELE: 612-474-5233
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
April 12, 1991
Barbara Brancel, Mayor
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Dear Mayor Brancel:
Enclosed is the corrected report and tables regarding the
Fourth of July Special Event in Excelsior. We thank you for
discussing the concept with your Council.
Sincerely,
~~~
Gr~pry S. withers
City Manager
GSW:cj
Enclosure - 1
/>
.
.
Proposal to SLMPSD Coordinating Committee
to Redistribute July 4
Advanced Services Costs from
Excelsior to Other
I. Introduction
A. State Financial Crisis is affecting Excelsior
B. Looking @ costs of providing services
C. $351,000 cuts, 30% of Budget
1. without corresponding growth in other areas
D. Early step in planning strategy to address the financial
problems of this magnitude was for Council and Manager to
formulate a Mission Statement.
1. In that statement we said City exists "to provide
Basic Service..."
2. In Work Sessions, Research and Discussions started
to develop concept of "Basic" and "Advanced" services
E. Taken closer look at Special Events in Excelsior
1. Scrutinized types of service - basic and advanced
2. Costs of these types of services
F. Determined basic and advanced services for
1. Administration
2. Public Works
3. Fire
4. Police
G. Police Service costs for July 4th are largest of any
governmental service provided
II. Current situation
A. Excelsior has absorbed July 4th costs in past
B. In recent years I.D. and broken out costs of one day event
[ Table I ]
Proposal
RE: July
April 10,
Page 2
c.
.
.
to SLMPSD coordinating committee
4th Costs
1991
council views this event as a South Lake event
1. Excelsior is host city
2. Chamber of Commerce plans and sends of invitations
3. Entire South Lake area is invited to the party
D. "The Host is Spent"
"The financial situation has changed"
"The well's drying up"
"The' rules of the game are being changed"
E. Other cities dropping community events
1. Golden Valley
F. Council wants July 4th event to continue
2. Wayzata
1. Serves a community purpose of celebration,
expression, camaraderie, history
G. Services provided July 4th are advanced
H. Service types draft definition:
1. Basic:
a. Provided to broad group of citizens
;:
- b. No direct costs can be attributed
c. Routine in action
2 . Advanced:
a. Provided to unique group
b. Cost is attributable '
c. Finite period of time
d. Specialized resources needed to provide it
e. Discretionary
.
.
Proposal to SLMPSD Coordinating Committee
RE: July 4th Costs
April 10, 1991
Page 3
I. Advanced services paid by service fees
J. 1990, 143 hours public time charged to Excelsior
1. "Out of Pocket" cost is $2,932
2. "Formula" cost to Excelsior is $3,489
[ Table I-I ]
III. Proposed C'oordinating Committee action
A. Entire SLMPSD Costs for July 4 Fireworks should not be
Excelsior's alone
B. Direct Chief to record all advanced services for July 4th
to "Other" category of time recording for 1991
C. Direct Chief to re-evaluate Excelsior's Demand Formula for
the last four years by removing the July 4th Advanced
Services from "Excelsior" time and place in "Other" time.
[ Table III ]
~ . I N 1n01f' S::eo .~
...c . < iln ~ti~M 00
e 0<1> M N
M ...c <I> '0<1>
OJO M I4-l . n:l
PlO I4-l n:l s:: a>:> E' I4-l g,OJ
~c:;; Ql. s:: U ~"r n:lM tn tn
s:: ~ I S,g I ~ 0 ~~ t/)W
OJ S::1n 0 0 s:: 8~Ql.OJn:l 0
0 OJ <I> Z ...c 0 ...c +J~OU Ql.C/)
C'Cl > I4-l ..~ tn M s:: ...c ::s
P:: ~ I4-l 'C+J.i~ - 0 Q)14-l"Cl 0
M n:l n:ltn .c: 'CUtnl4-ln:l tn
OJ n:l ~ o...c '0 Q)Og, Q)
~ ...c 8 HO ~ ,0( P:: t/) P::
...c 0
~ Q)
p.. . M\O E'
t/) tntn M co \0 NIO
Q) ~ \0 O\MO\
'C.c:eo <I> r-I <I>
~ +J n:l M tn 0
...c s:: ON<I> 0 tn
e Q) ...c M N M
~ ~ o tn <I> ..
OJ Q) ~tn ~~ s:: M
.Pl 0 n:l ~ +JQ) 0 <I>
~ ~ ~ ...c 0 n:l0
S::o 0 M n:l ~ ...c Pl...c '0
I4-l r-l s:: .c: 0 I4-l I4-l n:l
OJo s:: n:l n:lUO ~M~l4-ltn g,
> 0 Q) ~ U 0 P:: n:lO~O~
OJ ~O s:: I H\.lS ~~n:l n:l t/)
0 r-1tn 0 0 s:: Q) 8+JPlQ)u Q)
C'Cl C'Cl<l> Z ...c 0 \.lStnOl s:: ~. OJ s::
p:: ...c ~ Q) n:l r-lO"Cl "Cl ::s Q)
0 I4-l 'Cr-I~ - UQ)Q)C'Cl o 0
C Q) n:l n:l.a 0 "Cl "Cltn::s tnt/)
::s 0.. ~ On:l+J '0 "ClQ)tJ1 Q)
p:: t/) 8 H8t/) ,0( ,o(P::t/) p::
Ul
Q)
...c
+J
...c co 0 tnl M
>
H'..c COOMN
+J Q)r-Itnr-l~ M E'ON N
C) U ou* {j'r 0 O\o;ffJ' M '0
r-iA: Ul C '<;j' Nr-I 0\ Ln ~IN ~ <li
.0 ~<li~ M CON ~ '0
C'J..c:: .c:~ N N ~ Lii N ::s
8+J * * {/'r -* r-l
o ~ <li <::' U
...r (I) \.lSr-IO 0\ '0 * C
>t F.; C n:l ~ ...c
r-i o <li +J ~ It/) ~ r-l 0 \.lS
::s O+J C 0 0 C'Cl ~ .j.J
~ +J ~ (Jl <li o Ul 0.. +J Ul (J r-l C 0
~ +J C'Cl J:: ~l-l::SU) 0 0 to, 0 ~ c
C) +J tn~ <li +JOJ+J 0.. l.<l l-l ~ l-l 0
U ...c Q) U to' C <li Q) J:: Ul +J<liC> Ul 'r.;
C J:: P::;'C~ ~r-i <li ...c U) +J O...c U n:l+JO ::s +J UJ
0 l-l0 ...c l-l o 0 P::C'Cl ro 00 ...c r-i Pl Ul.r-! +J r-iev Q)
(J <li0 ;O::r-l::S ~lo-I +J .. 0 ~ ~O n:lll-l ro cO l-l <li
p.. 0 008 s:: +J- Q)Cr-lO+J 0 1l-ll-l~~1l-l Ul l-l<li.c:C'Cl !::..
Ul <::' OU) ~ C +JO::Sr-lUl~ C'Cl+Jl-l~O l-l C'ClCUlo..
~ <lico +J s:: 0 ::s U n:l <li <li 0 l-l s:: C'Cl 0 C'Cl o..<lil-l<li -lC C
l-l Ulr-l U) <li...c OU ,.-1 .0 :X::P::;P::U) 80PlOQ)(J o..OCOl-l 0
0 - 0* '-.UlC'Cl ...c r-l .r-! . U 0> <U)::E:~ ~ 'r-!
~ CO+J ~'O ro l-l~ .. s:: '0 '0 r-l '0 l-l'O N +J
<li ~ 10 0.. C ~~ (J +J 'OroOJQ) <li <li n:l Q) Q) 0 co
l-l ~ Q) Ul...c - ro 0 I Ul oC'Cl<li'O'O '0 '0 Ul ::s l-l ~ U
.r-! ro r-i'..c co l-l l-l C 'r-! U) 0 r-i '0 '0 '0 '0 <li tJ1 or-! ...c ~ -r;
!::.. p.. tJCl::E: 8tJ 0 Cl HtJ<< < A: p::U) !::.. ~ * r-t
0.
0.
Ul .<::
<li
0
...c l-l
> ro
l-l r-t
Ul Ul \iJ ::s
+J C l-l .!<: ~ U') 0\
0 <li lo-I l-l IlJ
IlJ ...c '0 0 0 "Cl ~
0 +J 'r-! ~ "Cl ~ <li
co > (]J u
(]J l-l 0 0 (]J o 0 <li C -lC
r-t +J l-l 0 ...c 0 C-r-! 0 co
0 lo-I Ul p.. ...c r-i ...c (]J cor-t .r-! <li >
~ 0 -r-! Ul .a r-l l-l >.0 r-l l-l '0
+J C <li co ::s 0 'r-! "Cl ::s 0 .r-l .<::
Ul ~ ...c U ~ p.. p.. ~ A: p.. p.. !::..
r-t J:: .r-l r-t
::s '0 > co
+J A: lo-I +J
.r-l CJ CJ 0
(J P::; U) 8
.
.
Table II
Calculation of Police Cost to Excelsior
for July Fourth
Grand Total 1990 Police Hours
22,280 hours
Police "other" Hours 1990
4.753 hours
"Chargeable" Police 1990 Hours
17,528
Excelsior's Charged Hours 1990
5,250 hours or 29.9%
of "Chargeable"
Police Hours Charged to Excelsior
on July 4, 1990
143 hours: 101.0
31.1
10.9
Fireworks
Run Race
Bike Race
Calculated Charged Hours to Excelsior
w/o July 4 Activities
5,149 hours or 29.5% of
"Chargeable"
Difference in Percent of chargeable Hours
.4%
Excelsior's Share of SLMPSD Budget
"chargeable" hours.
SLMPSD 1991 Budget for Sharing
Excelsior's 29.6%
@ 29.1%
Difference
is based pn our percent of
$872,280
260,811
257,322
$ 3.489
This is an example of how approximately $3,000 of actual costs for
the 4th of July grows and is charged at more than double to the city
because of the Joint Powers Formula. The extras of course are the
charges for overhead.
Revised 4/10/91
Q) - I '0
0 I' N .0 Cll
~ M I' 0 . J..l
:= Q) \0 CO o Cll
J..l 00 ~
Q) N M I J..l 0
II-l - ~r-l
II-l 0
-.-I :=*
00 Cl
J..l J..l'tS
<<1 Q) ~
r-l oq< oq< N CO ,c:<<1
r-l M 0 N M +Ja
0 M 0'\ M I' OQ)
Cl Cl
CJ 0 0 I' M ~
+J CO In In CO -.-I 0
Cll M M N fil
'0 '000
Q)~
~ I' O,c:
lX:l ~+J
I' N M CO 0l'tS
0'\ M M M 00 'tS~
\0 0 CO I' 0'\0'\ ~<<1
0'\0'\ 0 <<1+J
~ I' 0 0 M MM 0'\ 'O~
I' In \0 CO 0'\
M M N ~ ~ M Cll g
-.-I -.-I >a
~ o <<1
I' 00 00 -.-I a
J..l J..l Cllr-l
00 00 ~ ~ CO J..l <<1
Q)+J o 0 N Q) ~
-.-I 00 :r::= In
+Jofll .og
-.-I CJ Cll oV> I'
0
CJ -.-I fil \0 M In \0 0 OM M oq<>t
00 COin >toO
J..l.!>:: ~ +J M I' 0'\ 0'\ 0 NI' II
Cll J..l Cll ~ oq< r-I N 0 r-l'tS
~OUl Q) r-I Noq< 00 ~ Cll
o ~ 0 N J..l 1-)0
~CllCll J..l ~ ~
H J..l Q) I' 0 +J'tS
H +J -.-I _~ ~ := oV> 00 Q)
H~~r-l Q) J..l
-.-I 'tS Q) 'tS ~
Q)0,c:0 ~ 00 r-l ~ tytCll
r-ll-)+JP-t <<1 J..l ..Q <<1 Q).o -
.0 ~'tS a := 0\0 <<1 a p:: 00
<<1 ~ Q) M N 0'\ \0 '0 Cll Q) r-l Cll
80>tQ) Cl fil Ol Cl r-l0
r-l0 M I' 0'\ 0'\ 0 J..l o -.-I -.-I
+J='~ Cl ~ r-I N 0 <<1 Ul~~
01-)<<1 r-I ,c: fil
Cll > CJ J..l 00 Q)
1I-lQ)'tS ::lJ..lUl
1I-lJ..l< I' II o ~
fil<<1J..l 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,c:0 Cll
..c:: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 :r:o
OUlO l-l J..l J..l J..l J..l J..l J..l M -.-I
0'\ II-l :r::r::=:r::=:= ~ II ~ or-l
0'\ 0 0 r-1filo
r-1+J 0 . 0 . . . := -'O~
In CO 0'\ ~ ~ E-tOfilUllX:lCJ
- 0'\ 0 ~ CO 0 0 0 ~~'tS
00 In 0 r-I M In (,!) 8 0 <<1 Q)
J..l co >t 'tS 0
CJ =' I' M In I' M 00 r-lQ)~
0 r-I 00 J..l ~ 0 <<1
:r: I' 00 J..l ~ I-)=,>
I' r-I J..l =' 0 fIl'tS~
Q) ~ o:r:
r-l II 0 :r: Q) Q)
..Q := 0 'tSJ..l,c:
<<1 00 -Ol ~Cll+J
Q) 00 J..l . fil ..c:: r-l.o~
J..l ~ E-t CJ 0
J..l :r: 0 ~ r-l >t
<<1 In CO 0 ~j I' := 0 -.-I r-l r-l
..c:: fil 0'\ 0 In N (,!) II -.-I ~
CJ In 0 N In Cll ~~I-)
r-l II '0 0
I' M In I' .0 00 ~ ~fIl'tS
M <<1 l-l 00 <<1 J..l Q)
lX:l Q) ~ 00 00 00 00 J..l a 00 ~ l-l
I' Ol 0 J..lJ..lJ..lJ..l ~ Q) J..l 0 <<1
J..l :r: ~~~~ 0 Cl ~:r:,c:
<<1 o 0 0 0 := o Ul
J..l ,c: r-l fIl:r::r::r::= 00 :r:Q)
0- CJ <<1 J..l Q) r-l+J
'0 >t J..l '0 II-l>t +J ~ J..l'tS >t'O r-l J..l J..l ..Q 0
0 <<1 0 0 -0 fil 0000<<10 .0 O' o <<1 Q)
0 lX:l -.-I 0 <<1 E-t := -.-I 0 lX:l 0 <<1 -.-I -.-I Q) r-l
~ 00 ~ 00 J..l ~ fIl~ ~ Cll 00 00 Ol ~
Cll <<1 r-l ~ r-l ~ a 'tSJ..lr-lCll<<1~ Ol r-l r-l<<1Q)
<~ J..l ~ Cll Cll <<1 0 ~ ~CllQ)J..l~Cll J..l Q) Cll J..l J..l
0 ~ 0 Cll +JO r-l <<1.c:OO~Cll <<1 0 o <<1
..c:: 0 x J..l o <<1 0 J..l+JX,c:OJ..l ..c:: x x,c:o
CI) E-t fil CJ E-t CJ (,!)OfilUlE-tCJ CJ fil filCJ+J
QJ
VanDoren
Hazard
Stallings, Inc.
.
.
April 17, 1991
ArChi,..ctll - Englnl!ll!lra - Plannl!lrs
Mr. Brad Nielsen
Acting City Administrator
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Dear Brad:
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, I have.
prepared an estimate for the completion of landscaping plans and
specifications for the new water treatment plant in Silverwood
Park. I understand that the building plans are now out for bids
with an advertised opening date of May 13, 1991. Therefore, the
landscaping portion of the project should be handled as an addendum
to the building plans and should be out by no later than May 1,
1991.
I have not seen copies of the specifications for the building so I
am unsure of the total work effort necessary to add the landscaping
portion of the project to the contract documents. As a result, I
am estimating that the total cost of the landscaping plans and
specs will run from $800.00 - $1,000.00. I do not anticipate a
problem completing the plans by May 1, 1991.
I appreciate the opportunity to provide this estimate for
continuing professional services to the City of Shorewood. If you
wish to proceed with this project, please forward me a letter of
authorization.
Sincerely,
~~/
R. Mark Koegler
Shorewood Park Planner
RMK : dbm
H20LAND.L75
/4c . ;).
.... .1 n1..t TT <"__,~_ HU ,.A:______l:~ 1lA':~.......^+.. ~~447..,17!'\ tRl,}) !'\!'i~.lA50ccc
CK NO
.
.
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 22, 1991 COUNCIL MEETING
CHECKS ISSUED SINCE APRIL 5. 1991
TO WHOM ISSUE_D
6555 (G)
6556 (G)
6557 (L)
6558 (L)
6559 (L)
6560 (L)
6561 (L)
6562 (L)
6563 (L)
6564 (L)
6565 (L)
6566 (L)
6567 (L)
6568 (L)
6569 (L)
6570 (G)
6571 (G)
6572 (G)
6573 (G)
6574 (G)
6575 (G)
6576 (G)
6577 (G)
6578 (G)
6579 (L)
6580 (L)
6581 (L)
6582 (L)
6583 (L)
6584 (L)
6585 (L)
6586 (L)
6587 (L)
6588 (L)
6589 (G)
6590 (G)
6591 (G)
6592 (G)
6593 (G)
6594 (G)
6595 (G)
US Postmaster
Daniel Randall
Bellboy Corporation
Boyd Houser Candy/Tob.
Midwest Coca-Cola Co.
Day Distributing Co.
East Side Beverage Co.
Griggs, Cooper and Co.
Johnson Brothers Liquor
Mark VII Distributors
North Star Ice
Ed Phillips & Sons
Quality Wine/Spirits
Thorpe Distributing Co.
Waste Management-Savage
Commissioner-Revenue
First State Bank
PERA
PERA
ICMA Retirement Trust
City Cty Credit Union
AFSCME Local #224
Child Support Enforce.
Bradley J. Nielsen
Bellboy Corporation
Griggs, Cooper and Co.
Honeywell Protection
Hoops Trucking
Johnson Brothers Liquor
MN Bar Supply
Pepsi-Cola Company
Pogreba Distributing
Quality Wine/Spirits
Weekly News, Inc.
Commercial Life Ins. Co.
Minnesota Mutual Life
League of MN Cities
Physicians Health Plan
Medcenters Health Care
Group Health, Inc.
PERA
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
$
Postage for postage machine
Section 125 health reimb.
Liquor purchases
Misc. purchases
Misc. purchases
Beer and misc. purchases
Beer and misc. purchases
Liquor, wine and misc. purch
Wine purchases
Beer and misc. purchases
Misc. purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Beer and misc. purchases
Utilities
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Payroll deductions
Section 125 reimbursement
Liquor purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Security system monitoring chg
Liquor and wine purchases
Wine purchases
Misc. and supplies purchases
Misc. purchases
Beer and misc. purchases
Liquor and wine purchases
Advertising
Employee life insurance-4j91
Employee accident/sickness - 4/91
Employee dental insurance -4/91
Employee health insurance-4/91
Employee health insurance-4j91
Employee health insurance-4/91
Payroll deductions
750. 00
107 . 00
3 ,019. 22
1,899.05
325.75
3,304.25
13 , 532 . 50
5,190.17
2,576.82
6;574.91
136 . 62
1,944.83
1,397.07
9,141. 90
71.00
77 4. 71
4,757.15
1,690.31
15.00
390 . 00
60.00
126. 70
165.00
140.00
2 ,824. 0 3
3 , 588 . 30
79.50
94.50
371.49
171.23
159.39
891. 00
831.90
240 . 00
32.30
102 . 00
362 .13
4,282.00
477 ..20
321. 46
36.00
14,588.96
~/365.43
TOTAL GENERAL
TOTAL LIQUOR
TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED
-1-
72.954.39
CK NO
.
.
CHECK APPROVAL LIST FOR APRIL 22, 1991 COUNCIL MEETING
TO WHOM ISSUED
CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
6596
6597
6598
6599
6600
6601
6602
6603
6604
6605
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6017
6018
6019
6020
6021
6022
6023
6024
6025
6026
6027
6028
6029
6030
Abdo, Abdo & Eick
Airsignal, Inc.
Boyer Ford Truck Parts
Commers Conditioned Wtr
Consolidated Typewriter
Crosstown OCS, Inc.
City of Excelsior
Feed-Rite Controls, Inc.
FINA Fleet Fueling
Fox Valley Systems, Inc.
Gopher State One-Call
Paul Helgesen
Henn Cty Treasurer
Lano Equipment, Inc.
H.C. Mayer and Sons
Metro Wst Control Comm.
Metro Wst Control Comm.
Midwest Asphalt
Minnegasco, Inc.
State Bldg Inspector
MN State Treasurer
MN Suburban Public.
Mueller and Sons
North Star International
Northern States Power
Joseph Pazandak
Power Brake & Equip.
Research Quik
Katie Snyder
So Lk Mtka Pub Safety
Standard Spring Company
Suburban Tire
Tessman Seed Inc.
US West Communications
Van Doren Hazd Stallings
PUR?OSE
Auditing services
Beeper services
Muffler repair on truck #24
Water cooler rental
Maint. contract on typewriters
Coffee and trash can liners
Sewer rental fee-1989,90,91
Demurrage charges
Unleaded gasoline purchases
Public works supplies
One call services-March 1991
Janitorial services for March
Property taxes-first half 1991
Bobcat purchase
Diesel fuel
May contract payment
March 1991 SAC charges
Public works street supplies
Utilities
Bldg permit surcharge-1st qtr
Services rendered-admin hearing
Publishing
Belting for mud flaps
Repair of truck #25
Utilities
Protective inspection mileage
Repair of truck #25
Sr housing assessment
Council meeting minutes
May contract payment
PW vehicle repair
Tires for truck #21
Grass seed and fertilizer-Parks
Utilities
Park planning services-March
TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL
TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST
-2-
AMOUNT
$ 3,200.00
9.00
151. 21
22.50
110.00
123 . 50
9,300.80
30.00
44 7 . 46
. 30 . 08
15.00
241. 00
1,414.41
5 ,800 . 00
465.39
25,593.00
1,930.50
73.26
516.15
1,578.77
16.40
88.04
126.00
54.15
520 .28
67.62
408. 74
550 . 00
100 . 00
30,675.18
298. 62
103.42
3,312.00
45.94
970.63
88,389.05
161,343.44
", . .
CHECK APPROVAL LISTING FOR APRIL 22, 1991 COUNCIL MEETING
CK NO "" Iro WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER FOR APRIL 9 . 1991 PAYROLL
205032 VOID
205033 (L) Scott Bartlett 16.5 reg hours $ 92.69
205034 (G) Barbara Brancell Mayor 197 .10
205035 (G) Robert Daugherty Council 147 . 82
205036 (G) Charles Davis 80 reg hours 439.61
205037 (G) Wendy Davis 80 reg hours-l0.75 OT 780 . 45
205038 (L) Kevin Foss 8 reg hours 42.57
205039 (L) John Fruth 34 reg hours 152.48
205040 (G) Robert Gagne Council 142 . 50
205041 (G) Patricia Helgesen 80 reg hours 768. 60
205042 (LO Brian Jakel 40.5 reg hours 184. 46
205043 (G) Dennis Johnson 80 reg hours 701.88
205044 (L) William Josephson 80 reg hours 600 . 57
205045 (L) Mark Karsten 62.5 reg hours 269.74
205046 (G) Anne Latter 80 reg hours 556.75
205047 (L) Susan Latterner 18 reg hours 90.41
205048 (G) Daniel Lewis Council 147 .82
205049 (G) Joseph Lugowski 80 reg hours 716.68
205050 (L) Robert Lynch 4 reg hours 21.29
205051 (L) Russell Marron 35.5 reg hours 177 . 49
205052 (L) Kelly Michelson 13 reg hours 64.53
205053 (G) Lawrence Niccum 82 reg hours 627 . 37
205054 (G) Susan Niccum 80 reg hours 587 . 26
205055 (G) Bradley Nielsen 80 reg hours 930 . 64
205056 (G) Joseph Pazandak 80 reg hours 844 . 08
205057 (G) Daniel Randall 82 reg hours 727.82
205058 VOID
205059 (G) Alan Rolek 80 reg hours 958. 33
205060 (L) Brian Rosenberger 16 reg hours 78.84
205061 (L) Christopher Schmidt 80 reg hours 478.88
205062 (L) Craig Scholle 31. 5 reg hours 142.01
205063 (G) Howard Stark 80 reg hours 565. 78
205064 (G) Kristi Stover Council 150 . 00
205065 (G) Ralph Wehle 80 reg hours 566 . 63
205066 (L) Dean Young 80 reg hours 565.51
204067 (G) Donald Zdrazil 80 reg hours 1,054.92
205068 (L) Brian Roerick 11 reg hours 56.16
TOTAL GENERAL 11,612.04
TOTAL LIQUOR 3 .01 7 . 6 3
TOTAL PAYROLL 14 ,629.67
-3-
~-lj -=-~~ ~
i I
'"
; j
; j
1 !
: I
i I
I:
1 ;
; i
j i
11
Ii 8z.~ /JL-P~ A - /]J /)clA__j
11 ~
II
II ~f!,~ C/~. (:J7 ~44J.
il ~ - ~--cfLe- (!LJ--i-/LL tl. \k.....:,Z-.;j.
; i
I!
, i
II~~~ ~ 2l~
11f5. / - pr;. c/ (f'S 3 ""- ~,o
i!f2S.;- ~
! I ~~ ..'"7) '-' -'--'-~ f2-t' c-d/ 6 ~.. 7<'-. <:._i-/ CLo
ii CL/jFl ~ ecLCT0 ~,;;4~'" d n-4.V 7Z~/
i ~ ( Crn,,,,
:l
11 ~~ ~1d-,~ptL/J ~ ~p .~~..~
il .,h,t.-<) ~-~ ~ tIJ tyh. eLM O--f~-62----.
II. ~.d\~ Occ..c-~~Gk_~ ~ - - ~rfj/4--lcd1
~ I ~ lJ 6 ~J) V ~ ?Zc~-,-,r7~;r-- <2~.J
~G:'T 4-d tU.! ~ V ~ - ~~
~ OJ ~.,zaPV Mg,
! :
! j
If
1l7Jlo Pie- ~l
. i
i!
11
0"-fr f. {lJ,.c.
ii ~ ~ ~L~J ~/"c<__c.....-.u..~
i~t.dJ U-U 81 (. ~-- y .-.'-. L"t~,-- Zf~4C C-L-
Fd,J. . ~ cp0'"4r< ~dWk,t1
~ rL6- c.( ol~ (~lL-,.4-L~'" - - ~f'.6Jc./icf /"L;
~. M l,/} t> <IL~"- CJc2c (' yC c/~(! /-'-..- - C-J-L..L-;7~ ~
il . '~/
ll~ CL-4 >~~--~j jLcpc iI-(~~'{ eLf ~_a.~~
II
, i
1 i
i!
f!
I!
tl
!1
II
lp-ri2> , U~..~ (__.>?.,Afnu..U,./.- ..........-_.....
I~ L/2.t..jUa(4;?v'- Cu-e..) cnr"a~<,L .J.::Z"'./.... ...... ...
h ~(.(Cft""~.t.A7.J- UL-/I....LLJ I 10,1 L- ~'-~(L,rtl-.L~u~----
l~ ~'a /fW tu~~ '. ~_......
it ...'dJ ~ d2~~ - M ~_Jrd-~~------
~ -~~ ~ C-h- Ub $7!~J~, . .....
il~'cP ~-b <4?m ~.._.. . 'rL.-L .a/J-..,'1c'=~.J.._~_~'L~y.=
i i
II ~,V;2 VujJt. -S.l.fl c/J 0'-7I)ld{-.c-::~c_;;/.. _ ....
It 9-1.e~J-,~ O-c:~{~~J. -L,jjJ--"H:2',.I._...~~I_U
I, ~"'T-
II~r~d /J\-....,5,k, ...~AJLL.UfLL{,g.~R.{L&cfiy~~
ft-U- ~t)F~A(tU~~--~ . .~..fl4-~-L.-~..__.
.Ijau (jJ'r'~~ l/a... <j:'-LJ .~. ~"7'2p!:UL~ .Y'~y...
~C)Ur(ae.b LL~_ ~.. .~......~__~~~v~~.__...._
~ J' {' ~ CA.~Uh "'~.P"2Y /..Id. !n.nn.._nn . ......
~ LA~~A)rAlLv._~~L~ .....~.~ ~~r;4~.~~~.~_._________.
~ --r-~f_ ~f?f~L&:: ~ e.2:r:~~J_.u~__t~~_~....______
l!/L~ j ~~.p..C.._~__c./~l.?~~~)".__._~_..~_...___._
11-'-
I . ~
~~.{I tit tdLk/&/ . C:t:lif( ~44~Y '.' ~-f:2.L.-~~~_..
nCk L~~c I; (1... .{X)c.:z:~u u . . ...... ..' ___ __...u.Hu.......
i I
II~ ~ &h- -- IP- ~v....(J.'~n~~1fL~...
I ~ ~ U (d.......u._____._ '__"._
Ii
t!
~fU ,,( "" y -- 4fYreitd l~~ &1-. ~..
{I /{)d{J c.cJ ~. ..~~ .- dL.~~~:L.-i=Lbf
l~Lu CU~.~ ~~~ \OMii2Li~..-
~. -~e ;ft'1~'A - UuL<L4~. Ct4.~LV.7 ;;tL~~C4 ....
'. 4Wo~ ULLLC! ~ t.1tc.j;/~ ~&()~:~~
rf=U~Fk xc. ~. ,C/LU.'(fL^-<P?~~~J..Vf'&"'h.. ......
_" ! lie t C!..C - ~ t:f- ~ C/o CL r?'--/?-rl.tlJ .rn.-::L.:~ ._.__"_._u._______.
"
- c2-
~7?) )r)?JCC ~,Pt:>7t;-..a/a! C~>~ CX~~c0CLUCL</
~ ~ Uo db a~--cL,;4 a'Y ~ ~,
. ~MyJ L:c/}~J,1,& UL
> e:z97 tf-~.,,-~f 07L-;1' . }'--4L# G ~_.Jl'/ <C".J'6' (L...:t LLL./
,~J /2e(lrL~'d'1:Clc4~ :;;2?C<P<6) ~~,_) 1/4
>~CU-L;f4!1JA!- u.o)'~-Pe/ ~....~\v !e.'Lc- J~ c.h..Cd dzA7~.;;;:)
.C~'G/)L.C4.'/ ~4 LI} lLtA., C-.952 P- ~.~~'.(.;' A.J ~>;X--L
/ J / , 'j > r _ /) ,....,~ /? A~ ~/~
~L~-J- ~ c,,<-tiZ-Ll::'> . ~~,: ...c......,y LV~ I. ' >
~-y~{ ([I'C ~??/-;JLL';;;: . v,j 0u /:CF>-<!... L.t. J
,tJd-V:{./''L ,pv)< ,-ULL ~ ~t.L uUr -~~.~
~'X- ~)~y U!Xc ~aLL.t (lj)-IC4~
o ~~Lt V':7~ - r 4-J~ d___ _~ Y'd
~. \ 20 C-L,I::~>.1. L;?)2..L 1-CV___C6 ~;rx._>l C' ~ > ~ ~. ~
"r iU J.L,AV aLe, d /tL~'7)1 ~...(e:., L C ).L.~p~e.u
> . > v
, ,oL teL < "- d ~Lc-~; -V/~~ Y'l<--L ~,
~~/ dPiW c/--LLI r~s CLLo -r) J,b<'--..." "'7--' ~ rr-JI...
~e~j>' ?T - ~.~ 0u._??'7 ~ /)4
." / ./.:i (.' ~~
", \' ~L/J. l..t-()~/t'tp.>~, >-2~
~ ~ -' ~ ~ 5~ /' -:;t~/ ~ f7 V~./J _ .
'. L' l-f ..., f' GJ. t-Lcr.... Jh- ~,. t' ? _ ~ ~J (f!7l ~~ J ~
flJl-tJ1!f U-ol/lddl ,A~ 0 .J)./Uk., ~NI'r- / ~ 11i!J'''f'
. () - - v . U ( j A~" I 7
" ~ v..2(p ~o ~L/'v?~
>c~}<.-.J / 6-V - eTA. " ~ j LLf) '-V.- /:2dJ ~. ?~ /1 \)6'6
-----.. ~"-~-_.._._",."""""-,,.,,;_..,,"',,. .'.. -'- ---
" '-~aCG h"Ci~l,J /'1- ~ Lv () 7 il ~,~ ~ /2.d -
b)t:l / - W/U?t...(,....:;l ~,?e .....e',r"A >'LV C-" X-<L>>/ ..:..-L"fl ~"4
i;CzCCJ71<>ne."..,-_d o/c''')L..."..",__p W.-:>>.. tJ~/_ ~
(~tl (',.. ( t'c. v' r, ~ V ~ r,L/. /tJ /2, '--r91 d ~ t:.A.-,,? ,... I> .6 e:A '" "
I-~ V' 3' - ,,6 {' Lf "3- L-L--.,,~~ ~......"""..~>_c/- -r /' L~ 4J ...L.l..
'-:n&/L C L C ,-&...." ....~." 2 0 I' Y:lI /U (,LtJ 6 _<t.:rP .,6. Lel-::f ~.. Ifrrr(
-
-
..
;? c:I ~ (I o<oLt >, - Lc <1:,- '-'- / If L C' .
Q., ,......, LduL-d.<--nu..,L...-' -' 4~ ~j e'
~ I L..-&....t-L...p.-..;:. I L:' " LL.
. .
x:Le
l. G.::;)")' ,
~~...~' 2..;; / >4-((//..4. <"'"(J'. Cj?-)A..=,~,-V \L.../?-~..~
~LC t'/ !e:.., '-'<IJ/~,r7-'#LJ.l~~ #.Ya.~~ dy~~
/, /ry/ ) ~ /...", ./
C-/;> L' L....L-L. a ..LC ~. a.~J ,-/'~.L~ ~_-e-.^ t.."", 4"'~".....J
y' aa-~ c~<.c i--';LvV~ c:C:~ d!-),
,.6t) /
cy
,.dd/
#' U(9/J- C c/ .6,~ eX d I UL.-<..j d.€ )/ \!:::9,..4"t:dY2U
~. {.....t: ()'Z/Jetf ~d ,-.L~(.'/t;\ ~<-l V t!~-;A...~,!.J ~k/2.~c.L-'c:7 /z.q/
. &0 r'u...4__<1' 7JL.,,,';'v - pa'2V';,,_'...a.'~~~~7A.,,-dt.:,
~. WU'7L--,~ wGL:.~ v..~ C/ 0 L-'f./ ~ C. c:-2:.c? a~? d C!.~
.. // / V / ..'
: l,L--O L;3L . a <L-L~ C^- ~LF7"fL pc,,'-.. :' c;7 c ~
" (//) tJ a c/ L.fi ~4 V-(.(j ~ J L..~C'-'/'d tC.A.- ~.(...-e V /,,_,...~.~~
Cl-,. ~ (l ('>,c'.'\/ 1"'~ VJe...o...c Ct' .z>z? (
::i~"') (/' .c> W/tJ)/ . a ,< u' . r- r
, /'1 A I /J j
'....,,""----f...,..-,,~"'~----~~ __
r'
.~20~LcJ 9 - ..()V/P CLvc1-l ~c..V hL o..Ltd,
;.~ cu.'''''))/)2-lt.n{/Q ~ILtL ~<-L..,- ~2-c.(lL~.(,.ucf ~,~
,~....~
+ .~t 6 ,>:):; L\9"~ ~L2 vV'/ d of - U:Le C~ IL/7<- (l~/ ~.."'/ L(' ,p
v' j
.. ~Qi'('//;"_1i.i1tJ CALJ~ c,~ ~~(') '__
etl~r7 ~ p.;/
,/.. ,/ iTS /'/' / /. z1--'~/. ~ a
!.~t.:L-..? t-YU ; ~(.~/ ~ - ~ ~~t4.~
i,W&...~~ ~-t ~ J<3Ll. ct:a1;1cc.M~ cj
;r).~~, L.6.aLcI c5? dOLt/}~'Cp -.~ J1'. 7)(_<../ft;~ ~'<AU D.
f;
~
-
,~~ ~F)J G
,~~~<-- /lLd ktU-dL.:-~ ~.~-L-' ~
" cy~ ~ ~>
"~~
;i ,aJ~.~ ~ <~i6o(yii
!; Tv.2 ~a~ ~ ~ /~ -7-7? ? tJ
,il4 ~ ~ ~~S2 Y-07Y S
~ ~ /1: c:f-z) - ~.~ ~.._
~- ::2--~ /2~-~ ~.
~~. Z/4--9 Ll.~ /
,-SL~ .
/ //
a-L ~ (2.
O'~ 07~(!oL~
~ ~ ~....y cU'-;1l. h ;<-~~
/ ;) 3/ t:Jr.-}, ~ /2 c ~ t;J!' ~4> ~~.f:)
~-r' V ~7 ~.~~ #-d~.c"..-~ucZ/\..
;#~~~r,I~gl
--------
~/JV h-... /9/'"7 ~-b-l~ . __~. -_ ..
~~ ~'. /):h.~-- SdJ J~y(iY~......~.
W ~-- h"'- ~'1-.L (j ~~/' ~a ~.__
?; U-un-Lif ~ (L. ~~"J ~~~?
G~..d~ -~~~...~Y
CY~p-e~~ C-uJ.~ ~-L./ k ~
c+-. ~ ..6e ~~~ ~ ~ ~.,
JltWiUp a-Pkd". VY;pC ~/ /j~<'L~~. - .d4
~ru~ ~ ~~~7 <R.4.
""', {. ,.
~VbO ~.->
~ /1
~ IJ&u.o-
~Od ~~ -
.J:?L~- ~2~;P~......_. .......
~~.~~,l.-~~.-uP Z~ ~.~~ (~{. ......~
i Ch &It-r~ ~.,
; ~ A<~~.
! ~~V C4/:Jo-
d0~ ~~~ ;(:-~~. ~~.~.1..~./~~h.1'~
~ U-.J C? / <.~.., -L.~ A..-J ~ .
. ~~ ...
~ ~.d ~ ~ r...d-L.....~~
: ~ I ((h tP ~e &.~.(...2.~_L...(1-'"u~~
,! -Z-t) JI ~ i-:-:-. ~hvJ..-:;) .~~.~~(.-!!?.~Cl~~.
., aJ. !):!~~.~ L.ca-U~-';~
1; ~~2tJ-/Jl~ LLo(J.d '<f)C.6-~ .~...~
; ~'LL~ &u-~Lr;u..~-o/- I ~ ~o -(':;-d._~
: J
;Lu~~ ~.. d~ A/ ~/~. ~--~
~~ L"'-~ . dA~ Y::::~~~~~
: () c:2nLtd }i-:6 ~ U~ u- .~ c/ .-~A~~~~_.".
en.t-;(.. u/ d &-~...)( Y Cl ['l.~ 6-u-:,,~(J?{.)4,!I..L (~
Uh- 5-~
,4c0~ b//
I ~. ~~".V,J11-~"~~_._-<:;.,
<.J
~~ ~--t - ~ ~ ~'-~~
~~_ ';L:2.P)-'/2_~-- ~-;nt-VrJ fk--l. /..~_ --g_~_::.. OL. ~::d...
I~, ~~~~ - VF'?t_~.~.ct._#'H.(9g.2
-r~L ~1V-~ ~ 4 - ~... 1(?_~4~~...~?-~
. ".
7
! !
i!
tl
! !
~ f
I ~
II
I!
f'
H
It
Ii
if
I;
f:
II
H
II
I)
H
Ii
i;
! !
tl
, !
II
H
'1
i!
i I
1 !
H
I!
I;
ii
t t
i1
;
H
i I
! j
Ir
li
~1/JV/~V~
i i . '-. ./7 / 7\/ ,?- _/ A ..r?I . rl 1, / t. If. /--/1 ofi~
r+ <---t.-;L- ~ e9Z!/1-- ~~ry~(.../~-p---~-'--'--'-' _.__.._.n.____.
I~
J; ~ ~~.~".!. - ,..--..........-....... ..
ii ~
H .'. ~~~_.~.~ ~.~ G.ALJ ~~l-~._..._.~__,_7/~_._____._
I;
ft~~-.r- hL... ~ ~.-d.L q.....t:~..dit_~~___~_._.._..
~t (hAJ~ D ~- .....~~..~-~-.~,.~..- ....----- '.
il ()~-"-::r ~ O~
II ~~ ~..-eft ~J.: . ' . , ~ /"~ ~... ~-~~/-P~~.~~.
W-ILc /)f/V: .~'-"V~
rt ~ ~.. ... .....,.. ... -- ...,....--
Il~.r'r?V~~ '-:r>L-..~ "/1<-& ,d~.._t.J.._
il J( r2- r !;f~
H
; i
1l
II
l!
I.
,
. '
, ,
~ i
! '
f[
ii
; I
j I
Ii
dTi
, I
. I
. .
, i
. r.;-Iq
PH
! i
. '
: t
! !
fi
. '"
Jiw/"l /&.'ULU ~- ~.__.._._-
r". <-=Lr>~ (j( () ./U..<-<-<..e..:z:,-stf2~.. ....-
d..-,p "'-- 4.bku j)&l {Y~2.._C %_L':l.__ -.-
~ / :S--O,O,. Y1 . . ._._~___ . .._..
---- -.
~ ..f2rA.. f"'-2Mn--~ .___~.~,u___
~. .~<--<--<'ff .I7Y ..~~~.-,__/1.'.~,.___.
2- at. k_.._2--~ If:?c-~-::-.._~_~_~__~~..___._
JJa~ ..~~6 ..~.~~~~ t ~.~
~y ~~ Cu.F;n..L equ_4c4d~"",';!;<__~_ .--
{() of. ..a.)t n. ...~.Cq.(/;v2Ca./lP ~~~L~../__~...__
Qc) ~_,-~L.~L.LC. t I- CIi-'~5::.~!__t!=~_~~~f...__
/?7 V ~~'. .. J1 V d:i{<l~~'d d.' ~~. .___._ .P._..~.__h_._..______.___
.~. .. ;q-c/. Q,L ~.. 1 ,f~
~j)<4~ ~.CL,<J//)/d_
~.1)7a U -- ~. C-L-<./~lZ..~~~.4 ~, ??- e-~
_,__._ _. _0' __.. ... _.._. ",_._ U'_',_. _ _.____._.~_' .h._..,__,__~_~,_.,__<
~ &.b~ ~
... ,). -
:, ~M--I i2LpYg,
,!r-?~' .
i' Aa.-c../)'V ~ - LLa... )'2bAldX-- D'lA4~ ,6..v
i:~f2~
:: ~tc~l-~ ~ ~ 14qZJ
.' ~ - ~ ~."- (U)L)
e.
Jt
':
" /.l4j ~
~ --L-,--J] ~ b~
it ~6-d.;LJ CJ--o U-A.t~.~ ~
tt+- (/~V'?J (LL~__e~"-:J tZ--y /d/"~(~