The URL can be used to link to this page

040297 CC BR AgP BOARD OF REVIEW CITY OF SHOREWOOD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 1997 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1 . CONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING A. Roll Call Mayor Dahlberg _ Stover McCarty _ O'Neill Garfunkel B. Review Agenda 2. PRESENTATION BY CITY ASSESSOR (Att.-#2 Assessor's Report) 3 . TESTIMONY BY RESIDENTS 4. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO ASSESSOR 5 . EST ABLISH DATE FOR BOARD TO RECONVENE 6 . ADJOURN Kim A. Culp 6100 Apple Road Shorewood, ML~ 55331 612-943-2300 !I~ ~ (G ~ ~ \v,7 [~ IfM .' Iln APR 11997 lUll ./u u\ IBy I March 28, 1997 Shorewood Board of Review City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, M:N 55331 Dear Board of Review: I recently had a conversation regarding the valuation on my home in Shorewood with Tom Heller,. City Assessor. I appreciated his sharing with me the comparables that he felt were appropriate. Having had the opportunity to reflect on the conversation and on the comparables that were shared with me, I remain convinced that the value placed on my home is inappropriate. I do not believe that there is any significant reason to change it from the valuation of 1996 which was $706,700. Please consider this letter my response to the review board which will be meeting April 2, 1997 at the City Hall. I wish to reserve my right of appeal to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization. Kim A. Culp " Stuart L./Gail M. Finney 19710 Chartwell Hill Shorewood, MN 55331 _,._______---.--..-__ ~_.__,w April 1, 1997 ;-\ i-;::= c..:;c, i~ I' ''I 1" \;- ,....,. ! II- {( 11- I \; i --. I \ ;:.111 ~ \L~ IS d \~ If,; ll~\ iiU/ - Ii i~lJ AP R 2 1997 ~ I ! : By City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 BY FAX TO: 474-0128 Re: Stuart L./Gail M. Finney 19710 Chartwell Hill Shorewood, MN 55331 Property I.D. No. 36-117-23-13-0026 1997 Estimated Market Value Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are unable to appear on April 2, 1997 and are therefore writing to appeal the 1997 market value of $328,000, which is an increase of $10,000 over the 1996 valuation of $318,000. The increase in value from 1995 to 1996 was from $315,000 to $318,000, or $3,000, and we cannot understand a more than three times increase in one year. We have not made any improvements to the property. In fact, it is now another year older and like most properties that are nine years old, is requiring more maintenance just to maintain value. The driveway needs to be repaired or replaced, the wood trim needs to be painted, landscaping needs to be replaced, and miscellaneous maintenance has to be performed on the interior of the home. The foregoing is not meant to suggest that the home is ramshackle or depreciating in value, but to point out that it is difficult to reconcile a $10,000 value increase when there are no major changes in the neighborhood or the economy which justify a $10,000 valuation increase. I respectfully request that the that the 1997 estimated market increase be reviewed and $318,000. " Charles J. & Kathryn G. Fox 5660 Vine Hill Road Shorewood, MN 5533 I !!ij[E~~~\vJIE~ i~l APR 11997 ~ \ By \ March 30, 1997 City Assessor 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 5533 I To Whom It May Cancem: I wish to appeaL the proposed market vaLue increase of S2000 in 1997 for property ID# 36-117-23 14 0059. I am aLso requesting that the market vaLue of the property be decreased from the proposed Sl92,OOO to S186,000 which will bring it into parity with other homes on Vine Hill Road. During 1988 and 1989 RottLund Homes built three homes on Vine Hill Road that were based on the same floor plan with some minor modifications. The addresses of those homes is 5620, 5640, and 5660 Vine Hill Road; the later of which I own. Today Shorewood has assessed these homes as follows: ADDRESS 1997 PROPOSED INCREASE 1997 MARKET VALUE 5620 S 3,000 S 176,000 5640 S 1,000 S 186,000 5660 S 2,000 .$ 192,000 ClearLy, one can see that my property at 5660 is over valued in comparison to the others since the floor pLan/square footage is roughly the same for ail the properties, and my lot was the smallest and least expensive. Therefore I am requesting that the estimated market vaLue for my home be reduced to .$ I 86,000 for 1997. ~ Charles J. Fox Wk Ph# 591-2400 Hm Ph# 474-5082 ........ Ie ~ ,- n "'jj:-= 01' l.iiUn\ [;; \,.~7 ~ ~ \. ~ ~ni " 'J . . \ ' .~~ ~AR2 0 1997 ! ! By I h'\ "''-. 11 'T 1 ;t~ 3~ 1 R~~: - t (\. U-.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~o~~ ~c~ "~::ki ~_ ~-t'ta~~~~4 ~~ ~~. (;fl-~~ - ~ /- '^ d~~'diI~.~ ~ ~~~~ ~~LJ ~~4 va .-^-~ ,~ ~ ,0.----LLvf ~. G~lfiY~b' 1 A -, . ", . . . . . ... ,," .": " .- - . . '- ~ .' .... .;.: . - . .' .,' I~' "'. }:: '::':<: ," :-.'.:':~~::","-: .- .!- . .... .' .... '. ' . '~"'., ", . .:.. ...... "'_'';:~'''' . '.' - ..:.... l' - . t -. ~. :.- ...... :;-:" " . " .-. '. " .. . . .." . , I -: q. f r 0" " - . . -. .'. .-' .' -" ".. , . -.". ;..... ........,. . '... -',. ":,:.~:<}::::~.;:~.\:~:.: ,.' .,~ :,;:.>> .~= ~---"'..-c.~_ :1,:,-,- _ "'- " J. . :. <; Po.. ("c;S t C...... .':.\~l()'" }1A."'s53~f ;--___ n_ ___'. - - - -- ..,,- - -- -- , ' l- c '-:"0_\ ? ' ~.-J c. C-.~ C .~ -t ~ I -cO '- ~\C'J v.~ 3/J'I!c;7 ij~~~U~~~! .~ APR 11997 ~~ By------ --I I i ~ ~ . t ,! ~. .. .r ; , ! i l .j[ t i :f i t I i t . .. .! j I :;: f t: J_ l' ,~ i ~ ~ ~.- 'to j .1 ; " .+ ! '! i 1 .i l ~ T i 1 : c 1 11-( J1-5:; G>5 5 ~.y-f- ; 5"7 s-S- Ct'~TlLY c..z...vo K0 : 5 ;tz;4.ewc:x..O ft4;J S'-''S'j J / . ; /' " ~ 171/) / 5 l/t .E-!.f!.jUr4-t.- "LL?ff?:IL_.~f .,,--. -. -,-" ;4frcrrL o-F. OVfZ- T_h.}'f:'8i.c }14~iiCC'_,J/,rl-~~-&. --" &F _oviZ- f'I2,Of'Cf?- '71 s:~ 2.6 . C!/,!Ci<A:. . eo- S f/c.,,-i?=zwO, vUe:" H;/7c,e- L;Ui?t' ;f[:-7Z-c 51f-J~C J'1.,1J../f-v';;()--- -..- _d,L._P" J-J-pr,/(? IVC,~. iJ.i3 ,j'-.Jo }M ~ ;L~C..~07_:f::,,__-1 P _jIt..?:---..-------...-.------. l-f-ov5.C; ~(l (J)'t.e>1Gti-7 .C=:..f(~c~?:.&_z_ri.--J}~.!<-----------_L. /;.....; f3 ,q-~j~ .. . '1'-- " \ _..fi1J:4/-Jj p-j:. TI./Z ;-/vvs:E5' /~ rt:!-~,_.&PJ. /J!7tr )f,A-v~ _. 5""0 !..IJ ':~-v?- /4-/1..CL/ A:-'- f_ref) !t~{p ft____.;4-'-.L.. j-hf~E_ ..--."- c: i rYU/y1-T18~. C<..Jj'Z.B5 J )./ ~{..,Vl'~~)1 c/_"C.""-_--'~o_~rg--9....f.._. ".----" TiT/5. mf..L.}G-~ To .oo{2.. -srj7-E'rc.l-f-::Q-t=_.~A~6fi:.j?,~ft_f)- -..------......--. .. (,.~(3 d-c-vE JV~, J N 7 I..:IJ I'::....J...... c.~ )c=u../~f..-._<2tl:....__..fu g -=- .----.. 0[' U llf) ;.;JCs (~~!f-'g ~-rt.?~~ ,,2 j::::c./.C'-!.ls._~ - - ' OuR- ,..7?!-,xryic J/vtfl'rrZi;::.G-r vri.l-u'i:..;t-ij._._6-~.>,..;:? u -f . J 0 13.5 r:vt..v II A L Y .I -'-' Ti-r-t:= ~ /1""5 T".c 0 u I' .:. EE Y l:-n:-tL5 I't-.J-O.z:: 13 C;;'-I_.E=-.... 6 ;1-171-,- / "H / S. I. _s., ~~. 6- .... i '- ~. .--. --f7<l.J.1r::. k 0'-{ _ . ___ ...---. ---.-.----- ../1... .h.____._._ - . -'- ...-.--.. ----- - ,;/fv~ vll'~ 0- .._..__Ii/~, ,.~._-_. ..----~---.~------- I~t f!12/{!:___[)C 8/4-L.lf!. ~(.~~--_._._-_._.-.. .5""?_?-o cull&~i~.,!< j) :7 j~...e-.-...,<.J~7.J_O I {;I..:( /0 , . --" ... J.._. .-- .- t -. ,fDj:!:-i;'-)/7-:.Z5 32 002'-/ ... ___ ;+,1,A '-/7 t..{ - G 7)-S- ~e.. 9oG, - G; c 3 r . jt!L~lJie5(jt2d~ Iff! Iztl/{!y/}lE~C'5b,-- I2E~/)asE~-(2!- L4--29;t1~~ /I2Z!5-_-/?E~tLg9' LC?_ 7/)[ t!i?llbM-1/1I/R!4;95EZZj~ ~RHi1Q();rIJA<J (:?b~ Dt-.-tL2_~~~' . %~l2a~Lj; 1i -tiJI1Jtai:ats '~~~j C3WE lL2;(7/~L&f I?s 3j4:a'&5____ . ?fIaE d.S /1tJ g&6~I2~p.Rcg'$/- ~_ VH / uf) 1/ eo · - 112ERLd~ o~~__Ucl~k-5 .~ ~.' t'~~E.L2Zl..JL -!J12..ZliE mhldF.. ..''leT -@)Z2.. _ ~EF'E~_ mORt- C!t1!?Lu2j_t2!2- __ .1l2-/1d12~c-- <j~~ t~~a~'o.L ~ h~d:. . \ R }//7/// /1'- , . ~JL ~~. ,_ ~1-- kJlk&dt!7 .______ - ---- . ~Uit/t:C~.--/lk~2n$J.-2z.c?2 .n_ ----------~IJ ~ . -- . -<. . -'> ,-~ .~-.----~.--___~.l_ --I. e?j_~,/Il- ~3 =-~--=-t?r{J 6~u_" 3 (:' -1/7 -;:;. 3 - 12 - Ccf"5-=- , Increase in home's market-Value '.. ~,'i .~'. ' c' -~.'" _:. '"'. , s~ouldrrt' drive up your tax bill are addressing the same. issue in . their 1997 sessions. So should the The Minne~ota Legisiature is Minnesota Legislature! , ". attempting to conceive and pass We, the Minnesota Seasonal effective property tax reform leg- Recreational Property Owners islation. While numerous propos- Coalition,Inc.,'are supporting leg- als are being,'considered, most islation that will cap taxable mar- center on removal of all or part of ket value on allresidential prop- the K-12 grad~ school funding erty (home~t~ead.:;~easonal,~';~g from the prop~rty tax and having "homestea~.:nonhomestead.aiid it iransferredtQ the state or fund" :~!,iental}aUh~. axIDUaI. rateofiIifla- " /ed by a local sales taL. ,><.. :'.:", ?,"tion(coIAIIloDlyreferredtoastlle ' ;' ': In most cases the>resultwill be:::;coiisuri1ei'price~in4eioiQlP;!'c5$5 <l:su~stantial (~~mporary?)reduc~';;;..p~rceIl!;~~ch.evei is'l~ssc:~;,~i~ tion ill property'taxes for all class'-";i< i ~~c:wr!i!'}mp'~ove.mep.t~?~~d- '; ~J)~ pr.opertY,..~~, hOIIJ.~s~~ead.. s~a::i'<liti()qsar~}l.;c!gqeg.froIP-~pi.$,Lc,,~p . sonii! cabins. business, farms,etc..:;,ai1ci~cunew:inarketvalue/estab- : .Taxpayers (~hould.: be :cau::~'trrshe(fwhen,the propertY1i;:~id tioned.however, that one major .. (afterwhich.the CPLcap again element is missing from all these" applies). After aII,jf thefe'deral proposals, and"unless itis added" government can.:restricfSocial tOal}y tax refoi!:nlegislation, we'll! Security, Medicare, . gov~~nt be nght back where we are now ,employee wages and penslo~a:nd ~ ' .. '. -. .' . '- ~ "y","!{.Ij:' (or worse) in five years: What's thousands of other paymentS'dto the missing ingl:edientlA"rate of taxpayers to the CPI, why s~oti1d- inflation" cap,or ceiling on tax- n't the taxable marketvalues;of able market values for residential . residential real estate upon which property ownerS. . ,,; '. . .~. '. local governments base their.tax '. Under the ,~c:!ment Minnesota, .,...' collections : be ' based;~ ,.upi;inl market valuet'~ystem,. . taxable ,,restricted by thesame ind~x?;"j, market values can be:.driven up f;.To tax homes' on the basi~of by "market forces~, .over: which ,unrestricted assessed market val" homeowners haye.,absolutely nO"/ue has no relationship to theo:WT controL .'~'!;:, .,'" ners~rrenters' ability to pay, and If. for example;"SOmeonemoves ,"is ill fact forcingIIlanyhomeownf? into your neighborhood and paYS.,:'ersto s~lland move out~,Restrict:-' much more for a home or lot than<.ing' those,.tciiable. values:,' to the'. it's .worth - or builds a much',' annuaLrate of inflationWilldo~a~. , . . '.; _ ,'," ,,". '.,', ", ",.' i'.-.... more, luxurious home than the <much better jobof1inkiIjg those' average in the neighborhood-:-'}. taxable values to ~abilitrtopaY:OJ,i': the, foll()wing yecn:;your,taiable :" It will also bring more.IJressure.. marketvaliie'(~d ~twill goup~: <?n local governments tocbe more significantly ''::'i:,yetiYou haven't .,.accountable and reduce spending .,' done a thing~p increaseits.yalue.,by sprea<W1g the tax base niore It' sth.esaineJ:~)ln~ if~ before,~;,; evenly across all property classes but more' iniportantly~ no one hilS-,::' - and'eliminating "windfall" given you more mom~ywitli wpicfi" revenue- increases resulting from to pay the resulting increase in "market-driven" market value in- yourpropertYt~est,;_.,. _ .... . 'creases.Jtwill not,howeyer..r.e- The Minnesota Taxpayers As- strict local governments from In- so dation has reported Minneso~a ,creasing levies (a la California) :!t homeowners' maJor.. complaint, will simply make it more difficult: ' about the Minn~otci p'roperty'tax,: We urge all homeowners ~d., system is tax iIfcreases tied to renters to write and call yqfu:L . rapidly, esc}liatirlg market values, ',. - state seriator. state representactt~?., This is the same-issuEl that playe~ ~,:and the governor. urging thenito ,; a major role inprl.iperty tax ~;r;add the CPI cap legislation to~; volts in Califorriia{19781, Massa:--:,' property tax: reform enacted. T~~;; chusettS (1980)# Oregon (1996) .. bill numbers are Senate File Ncf:t and' prompted::~.South Carolina . 1049 and House File No. 1239.*'ili.;! (1995) and Utah (l995~96) to .~~~i; make significant legislative - Richard G. Wray,~ of Mend.O,ttI:> .'..~ changes to preventrunup in is president or the;MinnesoUf..:;; property tax bills due to rising Seasonal Recreational PropeT;f:Y:,;Fic property values. The Montana Owners coali~nlnc.'Y~-: and,Washington state legislatures ,-.", By Rlch~d G. Wray ~3/27/1997 14:05 817-4290044 JERRY SIMMONS PAGE 01 iKlRKWOOD AND DARBY, me i PROPERTYTAXCONSULTANTS i3000 E. BELKNAP. SUITE 400, Fr. WOR11I, TX761 I I , PHONE: (817) 831-3594 FAX: (817) 429-0044 FAX MEMO DATE: March 27~ 1997 ! TO: I I I ! j, Jerry sinUnons I Hennepin!County Assessor FROM: RE: Appeal o~Value Dear Sir, Please cou,der this as n'?ti:fication of appeal for property lD 33-117-23-14-0041 located at 24365 Smith Town Road. We pelieve.the property is worth $420,000 to the real estate, I have enclosed a copy of tie lease agree;ment indicating a S3,500.00/mo. lease is in effect. We respectfully ask that you further review this information and advise us as to your offer to reduce the value at your earliest co emence. I SENDING 1 PAGES (INcLUDING COVER. SHEEn. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES OF THIS TRANSMI AI.. PLEASE CONTACT DIANE GAUSE (817) 831-3594. I 03/27/1997 14:05 817-4290044 JERRY SIMMONS PAGE 02 DAtE '3.7.. 7-9 i ! , ; , . FINA OIL AllD ClttMICAL COMPANY HARXE!!NG DIVISION RUt !StA'l'E P.O.. :BOX 2159 DAI.LAS ~ 'l'X. 75221 nOM: I I I I I I I r I i i I I I I I I I I I l ! I I J I I . lEIS TRANSM!SS!O~ CONSISTS Of I ' o~ FAX (214) 7S0-4155 T01 ~L~d Do~ PHONE (214) 750-2910 I.(f' ~ "f- (jr7- s:f~/- 3 ~9f" r-A~ Keel) 1'~. lJ;iJL liESSAGZ S ~o~el.l.J ~~.o t...~J:.:r. - Tc.S. 't".o.Jl-\QI..C P!l..D P erl"'fl{ I \01 l,.. L...L.lO oj 16 [~~~ -r;4~, iltZe" ~ TClZt;. II ?ACZS. :~:CLT.:':i:lING T'dIS P":.GE. BOARD OF REVIEW INFORMATION Definitions and Explanations Powers of the Local Board of Review: The board may only increase or decrease the market value and/or change the classification of any properties on an individual basis. The board may also add any properties that were omitted from the tax rolls. These changes can only be made for the January 2, 1997 assessment/1998 tax year. Limitations of the Local Board of Review: The board may make no aggregate changes to the entire assessment and it is limited to indivdual changes not to exceed 1 % of the total market value of the city. Market Value: The most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Classification: The use of a property as defined by Minnesota Law. The most common classifications are apartment, double bungalow, triplex, commercial, farm, industrial, seasonal recreational, residential homestead, and residential non-homestead. Limited Value: A statutory value that is automatically calculated when the market value of a property is increased over 10%. This value can increase either 10% each year or 1/3 of the difference between the current and previous years' values if that difference is greater than 30%. Qualifying Improvements: Used to describe the amount of an improvement under the "this old house" law. This law allows homeowners of property at least 35 years old (and under $150,000 except in Excelsior, Hopkins, and Minneapolis which have a $300,000 limit) at the time a permit is applied for to apply and have certain improvements exempted from taxation for 10 years. Taxable Market VaIue: This is the net value used for taxation. It is the market or limited value, whichever is lower, minus the qualifying improvements. Remember, that not every property will have a limited value or a qualifying amount. MOST ASKED QUESTIONS Why does my market value keep increasing each year? Because properties in your city are in demand in the real estate marketplace. When values decline it is usually because that market has become undesirable. What if! think another property is undervalued? You may request, in writing, that the local board of review have the assessor review that property. The board is required to notify the property owner and then to direct the assessor to review the property. Isn't the assessor's value supposed to be lower than the actual value of a property? Minnesota State Law states that all properties are required to be valued at Market Value. As a practical matter the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Hennepin County Assessor's Office require the median sale in a city to be at 93%; thus one half ofthe sales are above and the other half are below this point. OVER Why isn't my value set at 93% of marl{et value? The 93% median sales ratio is a check, done after the assessment has been completed, to determine if the assessment was correctly done. Your property was valued on the basis of its location, size, quality and amenities. Why can't the assessor just raise the values of the properties that have sold and leave my value alone? The law states that all properties, not properties that have recently sold, be valued at market value. In addition the State of Minnesota and Hennepin County check the amount the local assessor increases the properties that have sold, the amount of increase of a random sample of all properties of the same classification and the total increase of each property type. If these figures do not correspond, the State or County will increase the entire assessment of that property classification. My house is worth much more than the average house in the area, but I don't get any more services than the average homeowner does. Why? By law Minnesota has an Ad Valorem Real Estate Tax or a tax based on the value of your house, but each property owner is entitled to "equal benefits" under Federal and State Law. I'm on a fixed income and I am being taxed out of my house! What can I do? The only current relief is the income adjusted homestead credit which targets seniors and low income homeowners and renters. Apply with form MIPR directly to the State of Minnesota. How can I change the way property taxes are determined? By contacting your State Senator and State Representative. All real property tax laws are legislated by them. When is it all going to end? It will change when and if the law changes. These changes have to be made at the state level. , . Clerk's Notice to Post and Publish - HC 1163 ASSESSMENT NOTICE , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the Board of Review of the City of ~hnrPlA1r\il("\ In Hennepin County, Minn., will meet at-the-ofiice-ei-the Council ChambeCiel'k-; in saicl at 7: 30 o"clock -L..-M., on City , Wednesday , the Second day of April , 19-2L, for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of saicl C i t Y for the year 1994, All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting and show cause for having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Dated this 15 th day of March , 19.2]. ") ,,' ,/ /,:"',~:-;' I,//--/ , ' / ~~:'7"<.: ~"1 It tJ ,,( ~ 4..A:~~,~,/" ',,) lVcJ6 Deputy Clerk of the I'; r}7 of Shorewood \ i\ '" \. ,~, r--.\ --> . . \ L". \.. A.- l" (. rf\., ~)...;::>........ '~-e.....~~ ~""cz,:x C::- {~CL.)LJ,/_ '--.)('~,,~'L"'-..-C~.-6;,..... ",..0 -," ~,-:'.:~l.~~';__-w_ - CL,,,,->__ \ \--~'\J 1. :\:>'3 ~~ II :-<"~ ~ ~ ~,,~ c_ ~0<'-'" ( f-~JL :, l--~ (l>__,~_~_<~ -~_~~:L<2'''P-''<..J ~> ~- u:; \' - x ,; -. ~.. ;;-, J,> c_,' \ ~_-~'--> ~S'-~ (~,~){".c,_~" ~'.~ ________,..,"<. ~ ~ c,J.J:,~- 'I- / {Il . ;- - "-~ " ~ ," \. G..~I...5;., C'\"--" \ J,.. - ."\-Q CL~ ().:;\ ~4- <tl \~..) \" --', ~,~ 14-, - (<c-t ' .--,~ = y".'-'j J 'L~L~~~~~C(;?{~? G\~-~\q -<U',c7-"j Ii ", t \l~.-, ~ ,-C,_ .,~t~-'- ,-,r--_ -'=f~ /,- ) \.~'D ~(G~n~~~\ ?...(,~ ! i ~'" 2" Ht, ~\< ,,~_ ,t ''''c.\ lqo_! tU APK 11997 ~\ r "'i,,:::,:~.,:., j , \ 1 By ~ .. r-~ ~ ';, \ \, ._r- \;' . "'\ ~~~R&- ~~--L.G~~\ ~ 5'5 ~.~ \ Stuart L./Gail M. Finney 19710 Chartwell Hill Shorewood. MN 55331 April 1. 1997 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood. MN 55331 BY FAX TO: 474-0128 Re: Stuart L./Gail M. Finney 19710 Chartwell Hill Shorewood. MN 55331 Property I.D. No. 36-117-23-13-0026 1997 Estimated Market Value Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are unable to appear on April 2. 1997 and are therefore writing to appeal the 1997 market value of $328.000. which is an increase of $10.000 over the 1996 valuation of $318.000. The increase in value from 1995 to 1996 was from $315.000 to $318.000. or $3.000. and we cannot understand a more than three times increase in one year. We have not made any improvements to the property. In fact. it is now another year older and like most properties that are nine years old. is requiring more maintenance just to maintain value. The driveway needs to be repaired or replaced. the wood trim needs to be painted. landscaping needs to be replaced. and miscellaneous maintenance has to be performed on the interior of the home. The foregoing is not meant to suggest that the home is ramshackle or depreciating in value. but to point out that it is difficult to reconcile a $10.000 value increase when there are no major changes in the neighborhood or the economy which justify a $10.000 valuation increase. I respectfully request that the valu~~~on increase be reviewed and that the 1997 estimated market:va1-~b~ se:t--a.~..__$318. 000. /' Ii i //"\ ,.,...,__ , f4jkry ltru+y y~u.rs . . "__"\",.,_____ '... ,{"y..," J / ,...-' " 'f--..! I / ~.-'-- '"~; "" , ~' ",/' - " / i ~yu~~t L: finney ) ,...// ,--.~ <",,..,,,'..,'" Charles J & Kathryn G. Fox 5660 Vine Hill Road Shorewood, MN 55331 lij~~~~Vl~~\ \~ APR 11991 ~ \ By I March 30, 1997 City Assessor 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 To Whom It May Concern: I wish to appeal the proposed market value increase of $2000 in 1997 for property ID# 36-117-23 14 0059. I am also requesting that the market value of the property be decreased from the proposed $192,000 to $186,000 which will bring it into parity with other homes on Vine Hill Road. During 1988 and 1989 Rottlund Homes built three homes on Vine Hill Road that were based on the same floor plan with some minor modifications. The addresses ofthose homes is 5620, 5640, and 5660 Vine Hill Road; the later of which I own. Today Shorewood has assessed these homes as follows: ADDRESS 1997 PROPOSED INCREASE 1997 MARKET VALUE 5620 $ 3,000 $ 176,000 5640 $ 1,000 $ 186,000 5660 $ 2,000 $ 192,000 Clearly, one can see that my property at 5660 is over valued in comparison to the others since the floor plan/square footage is roughly the same for all the properties, and my lot was the smallest and least expensive. Therefore I am requesting that the estimated market value for my home be reduced to $186,000 for 1997. Wk Ph# 591-2400 Hm Ph# 474-5082 Increase in home's market value shouldn't 'drive up your tax bill By Richard G. Wray The Minnesota Legislature is attempting to conceive and pass effective property tax reform leg- islation. While numerous propos- als are being considered, most center on removal of all or part of the K-12 grade school funding from the property tax and having it transferred to the state or fund- ed by a local sales tax. In most cases the result will be a substantial (temporary?) reduc- tion in property taxes for all class- es of property - homestead, sea- sonal cabins, business, farms, etc. Taxpayers should be cau- tioned, however, that one major element is missing from all these proposals, and unless it is added to any tax reform legislation, we'll be right back where we are now (or worse) in five years. What's the missing ingredient? A "rate of inflation" cap or ceiling on tax- able market values for residential property owners. Under the current Minnesota market value system, taxable market values can be driven up by "market forces" over which homeowners have absolutely no control. If, for example, someone moves into your neighborhood and pays much more for a home or lot than it's worth - or builds a much more luxurious home than the average in the neighborhood - the following year your taxable market value (and taxes) will go up significantly - yet you haven't done a thing to increase its value. It's the same home it was before, but more importantly, no one has given you more money with which to pay the resulting increase in your property taxes! The Minnesota Taxpayers As- sociation has reported Minnesota homeowners' major complaint about the Minnesota property tax system is tax increases tied to rapidly escalating market values. This is the same issue that played a major role in property tax re- volts in California (1978), Massa- chusetts (1980), Oregon (1996) and prompt~d South Carolina (1995) and Utah (1995-96) to make significant legislative changes to prevent run up in property tax bills due to rising property values. The Montana and Washington state legislatures are addressing the same issue in their 1997 sessions. So should the Minnesota Legislature! We, the Minnesota Seasonal Recreational Property Owners Coalition, Inc., are supporting leg- islation that will cap taxable mar- ket value on all residential prop- erty (homestead, seasonal, ag homestead, nonhomestead and rental) at the annual rate of infla- tion (commonly referred to as the consumer price index or CPI), or 5 percent, whichever is less. Structural improvements/ ad- ditions are excluded from the cap and a new market value estab- lished when the property is sold (after which the CPI cap again applies). After all, if the federal government can restrict Social Security, Medicare, government employee wages and pensions and thousands of other payments to taxpayers to the CPI, why should- n't the taxable market values of residential real estate upon which local governments base their tax collections be based upon/ restricted by the same index? To tax homes on the basis of unrestricted assessed market val- ue has no relationship to the ow- ners' /renters' ability to pay, and is in fact forcing many homeown- ers to sell and move out. Restrict- ing those taxable values to the annual rate of inflation will do a much better job of linking those taxable values to "ability to pay." It will also bring more pressure on local governments to be more accountable and reduce spending by spreading the tax base more evenly across all property classes - and eliminating "windfall" revenue increases resulting from "market-driven" market value in- creases. It will not, however, re- strict local governments from in- creasing levies (a la California). It will simply make it more difficult. We urge all homeowners and renters to write and call your state senator, state representative and the governor, urging them to add the cpr cap legislation to any property tax reform enacted. The bill numbers are Senate File No. 1049 and House File No. 1239. - Richard G. Wray, of Mendota, is president of the Minnesota Seasonal Recreational Property Owners Coalition Inc. /.' .] ',/.. / '.'.r..~~.i..i..I' r: . tlL.'..1.'S i.t..'.I-'1.:.. ~ff) j;} ---:1'/ f 17,;/ t t."j?.::~~' ^ .'^, j, f! :-~' 'I~r I , /' ,I" ',. /I.,;t~'/ 'v' j / 'C );:,(" t~,.J- , '''--'2 ,i} :7(;/ (f:iUJ7RytJ/t:tf,) I/If( t2{ $/J Of.'Fu)()() C/j Ilk; t/33/ //1 I <_, . ;<-I;r;jfReIjAl;lffl / d. /?l" '--) J f jf/z/I iL(~rl "hlt/il?l t I /)t: f//EtO . ',~ ~ ,/'--') ,../" . ,,' /) "l "-, / (/ / ,~, L/I--' c, /)' Lie' ;, _,.......~ /'" /'j ^ '+". ,/IC~ liS )iq7/Zllt)}f;/;~E I ~. ,-:-..-" .,/ --'. / .{) /} /' i ('{;/, /J" 1i'~";'L-./.~f)17// /..' l//.~ /n,'j! /7cL~7 , ,/ 1-7./////....) '<:./<<.//::. / Y.' ~<:_.. ~~ tc~~. I,r ~.< ~~' _.11/ L- /" ~<\^C till/ttlS /"pdl 1-:/;1/1It'/:;t)I:/c7/ L'S' /-/:7 />~~=- jtf)7i~'R'pc/7j;I#~7(:J;[S U::~.{fI'W/cfY;~;;5' , ,', .,~ / ' /' 1 / I /.1.1 ".",',' ..! .J; jLA / /' '-;0 / - i,tl~~ ^ ,t; /v // ,:::y //;//,e2!- tt/t:t"1(' /~l"'/r t1>;e;~.f^ / /.c- 5.,~ , " / ' ./ J/ J / '" ;:; f /.,/",:>//7 ii,t/L) 4 J:4'( a. /.' ~71 f::- /.//5:'> , !~.j?, /,;;;~j) /'.....'j~/)-~-' ;f//t t.///:: L -(,.,. j/7,~/,- L,.,,,___......"/,,/ L. //1, j-''f:.'/C /',7/ ;:'7 A/ It;. ,r/.I/U.....- ;f/?I:- -7Cc )/?/7 (/t/~jl?llfi?cC/ k:_;5~)?/<"'~/2 / ...7 l' . .,JI J . . . .."-_. / "J. '---.~.---~ _ _ _,_>-'_'~.) __,_ ...'" q~-FEAt;l'!J,F/J7i Ih :trt~t~p~ ~a}?! ~~~Z tJj;fiIJ!J!JSY[/? :I//?dlt1!Y/ D/"P/h7;~/(5~ ~O?/79: Yktf4~ :N!}:J:55p~~<~<[;f/{Jl~-~~I!~~)(/e;(i (/1:W / ,,)C (~(7 /t;, / /& /~{/L;{.<)/?J R ~~!/ /~( L)i; i: 5' \ /;::-'L)L/?LY rl/'l) ~7;~;' ~Wf.~[' /j/')-- -0 L- ,<-y~/ ~/'Q v '..<. ,Y !r;\_ /;/"c,~,~7 ;/ /' ~;;,__/ " ~__-/- /',6'", ., ~ ~,r}: ~ i/'iT _ , ~.... .. / '".-. / // . . ...... .... .. / -, / i,1f/l,d(1/({I"/J,e' ;f'j1Y,[/?~~ #/#/IP:'(/4:?J? ~f'O, ) Jlil'~' _ft (tt~r:2! /lJiilC/;J JiflY ~5r~~K~ / t.' t /; I .0:.. )/7'7 I 1/7 l/j'/,/r /1 J . L/ " /'. c/ /. 17 ''77- ,{r i~ //~L. ,/ / / / Ill7. h /{ L' :17 . -:,..4 11%.7{"/.(/ 6)t;-- L>t~4>/l7/ ----- . ' ;,;;;:;_/ . I.. /$J)~h}lf/ "",",,,-. " c."'' l,t', . {fl !II ct.~ '---r'! (I '/1'/ / I /i '-, . .!/i~ . _.~, ." r) , , . ..' ". . "", . "/:" I . / ,_ " l'</..JII.'t~..,:._... / /1/. II... //7.1!-..:-....IZ-(- / /).J. 7..i./.,/,rz'/~. ,:-...?, 7.r.1f)/t.<?. C;.. L -:er.v.<.......U?7.. / 1\ ,~ .~. ./~ . '~'.." J // 1-' / l/v~ ,-/ // ~/ ..- / j l-{(,'~ #", >Z ~'(/:(.C-._._./1.70iJ r'7c,'- //jl ~ttil #Y/C!' /' ~> .. / // . " :2' 1?!:vfEIl{?U5 (/t{t~?, f'!l?{1J1a;~:zZ;;e~<gZ~ v!Jc'f/)list //)Xc5>:'c, 11;)!:t ///1; j{),qq /C) -;7 J)E" /!/(}fi//U/;I.. ./. /7// ~_.3~1 /;/)y ;::.-/] ~ dC' If"~'" c h / // l'l./l L--' .I // - "- /( '-"" . i/ .....-11 ,,_.... ':/,. I , \, , , / c~)fk:l(X;()d .fl/lt:lly5 IJ/-~/? ~/(J; I~?j) A~:/.(} f"l7(YJkS' Id /)!/;/I.~ <~.5< i?& i!/)7;(:>J [5 I;~R(I 7c_,{i~..{J. J ,~7CY?)L:: / Hfky #:3.,(p/>7' /I<.J.,....-.;;;; yi- /p Os ' / / I ~) ',j / 7,^-'_ -----' ,.... '. .... ..... ..' .' ..... ". . .. ,-, ~')J;!:g /5 //t~' kZ:4;:t5~/J h /0~:fKcj9ci2-/j1)!/#' t/) /{LI-I/;(//} ."-~-'/JJl:A~ /lRE o~ ):}C;~~k-5 ,/ .'r-'}.I;?C<J J::' ./)]';, /'; ---It./ -:- .0r//'1 ~7' . / .... Y J c.Jrl./!:~/} /:~ cc~:'~I//I\iY {, / 'I.L:' /j/P..k/IL~ --- {,./t////J u)t'-f/C~ i ;;Y)Ci:f- (?(;YlJ/~ I)~: fJ . ,. ...---- /, -, /~/..(/~ ,. /l112~c:..~<f!..//(;<< ,I///??-t# dE ~ U/Jd( YlaR J,i/lltt#' I /(Pl5' / / (f;R/1a1ly <-;Ji/{tfd!- f / ..' ) .' .' ,. , / \..... / / ,('~i( // /}i'~//. II) / :,-~ .,f/ .' ./ (/" .~f~/!/~~ .'-"., .,/I,.1tf~i~<</f, .... /,.;;~,,'4../f/?~?'-- ~/.lt./?7i:~;7? /:;7/7/ /(/ //1-1/\ V ?"l../,;/ / /\ "e: /? /C,()/ C~/ ~;/I<'{KE-!/~tZ/' /lJ:;7., c7833;- ~3Z '~-2- /"'., I-~ :;i-' /"./" < J "7- ""'" -, 'L' /...<;.. /'#' ~..' /' > ,_j .' ''';.,;;o~~ / -,~:;;- 7 ,?- ~-rtJ ..:J r'i (:" - //7 ,,;<3 / 2-- c/o ....... :: t11-;s: :< 10 t:J' 8 ~. r;;Vl(C c':;::".. ..'"1~ ~ 270 "'::J 8'0 Vla~ Vl(j w... W' - it'.1 ...'..". L... ',..' .'. '.,...,..,. '. f / \ ; \ ~ ' I: . ., ~ ';, Kim A. Culp 6100 Apple Road Shorewood, MN 55331 612-943-2300 March 28, 1997 Shorewood Board of Review City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Board of Review: I recently had a conversation regarding the valuation on my home in Shorewood with Tom Heller, City Assessor. I appreciated his sharing with me the comparables that he felt were appropriate. Having had the opportunity to reflect on the conversation and on the comparables that were shared with me, I remain convinced that the value placed on my home is inappropriate. I do not believe that there is any significant reason to change it from the valuation of 1996 which was $706,700. Please consider this letter my response to the review board which will be meeting April 2, 1997 at the City Hall. I wish to reserve my right of appeal to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization. V71Y yours, /,A/ <; / J- '., ,/. ;:~"'0:"'";:;>,<',/Aj~. ~ /, ! I ~ .,. ( i \....../ Kim A. Culp <~ CENTURY BANK 11455 Viking Drive Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344-7247 Shorewood Board of Review City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 ~;~":~"!r~;::;' ^.\, 'T ~"'S>~?....s. ........ '.':.'>,;:;' III II II 1111 III LJLH;IlL,!,I,lIlHI,ldLl!LIHLl,mlll . t ! H tUt .1ff flU if.! !,,/' l' ':- /71-- i. r '11:. \.-""" ) "- j, -j ~ - . ,;t / ') ) ~ !- 'I 1;'- cot::: ?! / :'-;.:- (...... F/7 ? . . . . .::: . . <,-' . .- - . t- . r ),- ~,\_- ..... _ '~A> /0;; ) (- ,,~-, , /1, ~)~ ';~ ~ t:' if,s' (- /T:<'''r--;--'f- )/'T i .I - . e - e . :. . ~J ) ." -; ') -; ",---< ...! I /, The McClures 5820 Eureka Road Shorewood, MN 55331 E TED "fSA32 .. . .~f\,i\4 ,~:~r... ......, Ie rr\:; -' n \\ f7 =~. "IO,! \, r-,' \,~,.J U=, 0 \v! ~ U I ;1 < I, ul :vIp.k'~ 0 1997 I , By _ I rYl G..J<. ,I~ _1.'L____ __ _~______""__'_'_"_'m __ _ ._.___._..__._. ., . . ..... .. .. ' ,_, , .~ ~_.. __' j ---~ ~ ]~ J R.J4~:"" , ---.--n-J:-~3 "i:-~~--~;)--- . -. 10 n~~'~ -.Lm~,. ~J:_ =a::':~~~~4 --~=~_ ~s. ~. ~-~~ ~--..----:~ '-'1/.::.-rr~d-'- -._~ ~~'J~-~-W'I'~~.\~~ )~ _~ ~. ZLo 14 O-M.~ .____. :__O><-?--~ ~, _ --~ .~~~.~~ ~_.. - -~-- q~-~-~.~_.~ - 7-....--(J--~-._----------_._-_._._-..__..-~ ---------6~l~-;7~~, __~__ ------_._-~-~_._~----_._-----~ r. S, ~ ~ ~..~.~__ ~.------- ~--6 .!~ ~~ .._-~_._---_.~-_._._------------- JV\ T ----.....--------------------- t L"", ~ J. ~cq,,~ foaest D.... Vcf-'t.\~lf>'" ).1..\... ~53:S ( 't-.~-.. ..b,.._1IM 1. ." ~~""--__.::...c..._.........~-.t:::l~"t.,,-, - ~ ---- -----. -~ [ -----. \ I: .--- ~. ~". '~~ --- -.......-.' ~- Loc.c.....l 13oa..v-d o-i- ~e\)Ll-e..W ~3i27/1997 14"5 817-4290044 JERRY SIMMONS PAGE 01 iKIRKWOOD AND DARBY, INC i PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANrS 13000 E. BELKNAP, SUITE 400, FT. WORTH, TX 761] ] ~ PHONE: (817) 831-3594 FAX; (817) 429-0044 FAX MEMO DATE: March 2711997 I I TO: Hennepin!County Assessor i i Jerry Sin$ons I FROM: RE; Appeal oiValue i Dear Sir, Please COD 'der this as n~tification of appeal for property ID 33-117-23-14-0041 located at 24365 Smith Tow Road. We pelievethe property is worth $420,000 to the real estate, I have enclosed a copy of e lease a~ent indicating a $3,500,OOJmo. lease is in effect. We respectfully ask that you further review this information and advise us as to your offer to reduce the value at your eaFliest co emence. SENDING 1 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET). IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE AlL PAGES OF TIllS TRANSMI AL l'LEASEfONTACT DIANE GAUSE (817) 831-3594. f-2-11 12.. 'E: 80/jrd _~ ~f.' '~~i ,,,,,,'P,-<4 J "-'" ". - ~ ' -. -,-" ?liJP 35-\\i-:t3-14-ooo1 ~II_ 11;.1. J 10 l.O 0 enr.5 TM C~:5 {ctk Pt I o IA.J 17 .P.f: --;':;0 <"0 t h If L.Ci /7 E. {f)tvrur {~r7/1C1 t C~.t/t~h-f0 80dFC( of Rp.u~Jlvv f rYJLC ;-, "J UJOV--( cI J d i4_.e..- 1-0 /// h~o.-/M 6~f L/!<R Iv be.. / r"} C I l-CC/ .1( d ;' r; J ?ro?fl.rr~ ICf17, Vet-Jut:... b~ I'r/<j IlV/~~vJ.I(D II Fur TO: Shorewood Mayor and City Council Members Jim Hurm, Shorewood City Administrator FROM: Rolf Erickson, City Assessor, 473-1844 DATE: March 24,1997 RE: Local Board of Review for January 2, 1997 Assessment The sales used for the January 2, 1997 Assessment (taxes payable in 1998) occurred between October 1, 1995 and September 30, 1996. Values for these properties that were established for the previous assessment (1-2-96) were compared with the purchase prices to determine what changes were needed to more accurately reflect market value. Properties indicated on the enclosed map in the yellow area were physically inspected for the January 2, 1997 assessment. All properties in the city are recalculated every year. AGGREGATE PROPERTY TYPE GROWTH (Total market value growth of each property type) L ake shore 6.6% Off Lake Residential 4.0% Town houses 0.0% Commercial/Industrial 5.2 % Apartment 5.0% Individual property increases varied from 0% to over 20% in extreme cases. The Local Board of Review can address only questions of "Estimated Market Value" and "Classification" (see definitions below) for the January 2, 1996 Assessment (taxes payable in 1997). The Board can make reductions in value not exceed one percent of the current total market value ofthe City. There is no limit to the change allowed of individual properties. Market Value: The most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price in not affected by undue stimulus. Classification: The use of a property as defined by state law. The most common classifications apartment, double bungalow, triplex, commercial, farm, residential homestead and residential non-homestead. We have enclosed a book of the sales considered for the current assessment as a reference for you to use at the Board of Review. PLEASE BRING THIS BOOK TO THE BOARD OF REVIEW! A copy of the local board review section from the Minnesota Property Tax Administrators Manual is included for your information. If you have any questions, please call me. I will also be at City Hall one hour before the board of review to answer any questions that you may have. __' .Jr................ S1'-- 'A~K g ..ouolO =- ~ ~..... =- -="- I ~ /i!iff' -. _ 17 =-1 -(' ....... "._" ~- ~J" I. PO"'''' ""~'~ ~S~GJlE Irjf JC) ).~In'JnU'CoI..#fjI'IP4'E ~roI'. ~,!!~ "l ?"'\\ ~ ~E_J ~I ~~~. ~~ ~ f- -- I - ?~ .~' =;: *...t:::::=ftj ~l f~~. ~." (30) ~T ..-:Ji. r.-;;;;;- .~ J -===-- -- . :.. ._ .1. iJ- ~ h .' g ~ :'J ~1 i'l ~ \\1 n },1 MAP OF SHOREWOOD }lENNEPIN COUNTY POP. j-J / ~ "i,(;/' .(.,.:.... 1,;" LIII, MiM6/OIJktl Upprr LD)>' 14 --_....:....-..~--- - .......- ".' ~ ... .' -'.. , :.. ,. ',,--- DATE: 09/95 SECTION:4120 PAGE: 1 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW - DUTIES The town board of each town, the council or other governing body of each city, is the board of review except in cities whose charters provide for a board of equalization. The county assessor shall fix a day and time when the board or the board of equalization shall meet in the assessment districts of the county. On or before February 15 of each year the assessor shall give written notice of the time to the city or town clerk. Notwithstanding the provisions of any charter to the contrary, the meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The clerk shall give published and posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date of the meeting. The board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review the assessment and classification of property in the town or city. No changes in valuation or classification which are intended to correct errors in judgment by the county assessor may be made by the county assessor after the board of review or the county board of equalization has adjourned; however, corrections of errors that are merely clerical in nature or changes that extend homestead treatment to property are permitted after adjournment until the tax extension date for that assessment year. The changes must be fully documented and maintained in the assessor's office and must be available for review by any person. A copy of the changes made during this period must be sent to the county board no later than December 31 of the assessment year. The board shall determine whether the taxable property in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and properly valued by the assessor. If real ,or personal property has been omitted, the board shall place it on the list with its market value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its market value. No assessment of the property of any person may be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent of the board to do so. On application of any person feeling aggrieved, the board shall review the assessment or classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. A local board of review may reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the county assessor by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments , made by the county assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the board of review without regard to the one percent limitation. '~ DATE: 09/95 SECTION:4120 PAGE: 2 A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented. The asse~sor shall attend, with the assessment books and papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not vote. The county assessor shall attend the meetings. The board shall list separately, on a form appended to the assessment book, all omitted property added to the list by the board and all items of property increased or decreased, with the market value of each item of property, added or changed by the board, placed opposite the item. The county assessor shall enter all changes made by the board in the assessment book. If a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the board after being duly notified of the board's intent to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not appear before the county board of equalization for a review of the assessment or classification. This paragraph does not apply if an assessment was made after the board meeting, as provided in Section 273.01, or lfthe person can establish not having received notice of market value at least five days before the local board of review meeting. The board of review or the board of equalization must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. No action taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an assessment or classification, made after the meeting of the hoard must be heard and determined by the county board of equalization. A nonresident may, at any time, before the meeting of the board of review file written objections to an assessment or classification with the county assessor. The objections must be presented to the board of review at its meeting by the county assessor for its consideration. (M.S. 274.01) '---.. DATE: 7/86 SECTION: 4121 PAGE: 1 ~ SPECIAL BOARD OF REVIEW The council or other governing body of any city, including cities whose charters provide for a board of equalization, may appoint a special board of review to which it may delegate all of the powers and duties of the board of review or board of equali- zation. The special board of review shall serve at the direction and discretion of the appointing body, subject to the restrictions imposed by law on the appointing body. The appointing body shall determine the number of members to be appointed thereto, the compensation and expenses to be paid, and the term of office of each member. At least one member of the special board of review shall be an appraiser, realtor or oth~r person familiar with property valuations in the assessment district. (M.S. 274.01) DATE: 8/88 SECTION: 4122 PAGE: 1 LIMITATIONS A local board of review may reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total adjustments must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the county assessor by more than one percent. If the total adjust ments would lower the t b more than one percen , none aggregate assessments made by the county assessor y of the adjustments may be mad~. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or . double assessments discovered by the board of review without affecting the one percent referred to above. (M.S. 274.01) 7 lii'~\:/~ 'L::'/;,l ;,'1>;, ji.;.,(',l--'lv";Y5< it ',J<- (f/e <.,)7/ -5(,//',7"',)< </.2 G",,).. , 1 8 <:. ,t,C!..::'>" ",1,i.. \i~ ,ii::i-.4.. ",.i., (j.......rl-...., ..,?-~, I, 1.. L:J "",.,{(\","".'A'r-' -- . ".,~, ~'""",,, "ht ~: , .",A, 1...0 <:._......,:/jV 5"""'?i:::t-l""; Sl1"" >- i 1 , 9, ..!: ~ tc'~ ",' ;< . .-JJ, -"- .j:~ , j';""" ,_ L" " "'''(''..? ii.t it Ii, / ,. "T ,}if' L :r/ 'I",) <TJ) YN v ",-,,,,:/ C~., -/',;. d v'\. 10 ' jJ..-k /-l/;'v ,.i:l.n J_ " . A. /.....d . <',w ,''_"_ It t~llf,1:7tL,..< ,,' "'.I/ttt,~- '?J'.,.'i,y..,.:::~~_~-~;~, ".~t7r-7-Yc ... 11 :-,~~""d4:) .-it;' S"t,'} () i{.1 Qg,~(,lV1C.l j) 'flY-IVY! s.$ ..1/7 -2..)'2.3ocY:\ F 12 \ t'u II II'; II I;:}\ a lh. ~Z S/7/) U (';"d <'~.",-/.,... l;:; (/7 if.. / t.., )C- '3 / II 7 2 r 2 '/ f.: () It) 13 / I L ; ,1 \ ,) te... V t:' ! e~ 14 ;.:(U c [' {J{'6/~j Ie II Please Print 1 2 3 4 5 6 NAME 12 '/1 ~ l. . ?f IJ//I / (/(C(\.(~ ~'-, ;.,' 'J' . '. ., \ J^ 'v (:, ,..... -- ,_ '"" "'........,Y'\. ')6..., J?l' /-i r ~ f oS e .~ J.-!II f{ v€ It 51 R (HI if! " _..J' ~).4~ lO (4"';;::\;...) L ES ~'EL\L Paae I b_ c? ',' "'i".F) )(~ BOAnI) OF REVIEW MEETlNC SIGN-IN SHEET -hIt '2- , 19911 Please Print STREET & ZIP CODE .~7VO YJ/ltI,1C[;(//1 /~{ PHONE PID# APPT. 7-7'!'3'5';;-S- l.OL\(J ::: t\A.Q\..(j.T~\ <:.. ~.1 41 C <-WSo ::;,-1., l ( 1- ,} l' .s~' D(,} ~ ' ~ f2r c J., "7"".Jr4- ~() '1)4/-9600 J'I-J)'7-~3 7Y 0010 ,:rr4iJ{!dRi~TlHl/s/..f<.tv., 1'71..f~7 }j-:'itl-.l] f~ p~/7 S $l:5 '" .:.Jc:'t;.(c\c'...,,-e;xJ' "p, 'f 7c - ~I (:, I 13:S '-117-2.3 1..l Oc)z8 - c;S33J Z 3 3 q(J t'\:4fl.\L ~T- <\1 ~...q~3l) 3 c:\.. -\ \l-'"L3 31 O"D?,cl s' Y J' j' .t) f D C ,~.J ':";)'1 "15,) 'I l-.,,\J f) n ) ",,' ~ ,.,) J' ,) I) i(. (' ,,,l' leI t {1l /-017, Y 7tj- f'/l7 t. J { , ! 1'7 " 2 J { 4 a>1 15 ::S0W-1\1 uJ0CJ1 l{qt,S' R",ao./'t.Wa.21 40l-{)L91 JS l/7 .;j.3 dJ Q:!cJa 16 ;(/ J 7'/<"'- S S"SS\;'-,/\~~!, i' pf (>' , 6< -- II? ,- 2 J J 2 c .v 2" .. i 17oj,t: '\C)vbc..L ,5Yt:,{; CJ1/t','trI,)(l.jLI /{7i"c'v.Jk"5cl-t/7<J-s (f;)., 00/9 18 L IN 0/\ ""IT, ,i~jh (-~. cL ) C;;) l; .i/} + 0'1"" .9 7 ) >J2.,Li o7Sw ,- ! (1-;).. >) ;,2 y CD (3 19 _ .V:4i l....:'O..7rYff ,)>) 6--'-cl-~ L.....".'-. "t 7C ')- r :? 1... I 20 ~J?'h IJ---j'-Jt=J\V'Lt--- 'ZZ..c~,-t.,TC='~"(Z."L-<;:;o~"7X'I.';;'rt17c-:c4i7Jt-~e_.p\.ol)<'cQ (~//'\,('<;, U? t~i..JS f- 21 Lli\,b'1 4Q~Q(;\I,c\S(cLt'C +\<\fdIV\<; .A\:p 47C-Grh1.S- '3:~"II7- d3 J-3 eve)) 22 [rJ! ~;Jl"UvtJfll:'V\/lft; ,?i1Krtt;L '{IIA'lJ'tftim 17t .t3ft'tJ /- . ! I . ,,'::1.S--" 7 '- :13.0 =]4- 23 I ~fH~, A \'\JCe.. mLN'4-L::I .?) (';'>:I; () l::=iCe:....5iO,:-:( 3 LV 0 '-t7~ _j R?,O 00;2 0 24 ~4.,"~ &c~.~~lv.( 7tb~)~yl+ /'010<:2 t~d Y71j-S:3tt~'9-1-117-dY ;:30:JJ) 25 )"..c.. ~ ,,:'f""> t ( /~/'/f'/j ~"';"e"/ I , i.r .?! <,t't '. c c ;' (~Z (Vt'Ln/'\1 -e kd .. J dl(7/5 .... L ,'Y! (j 1 I{/ r <S(/ <15 , /1 tr- (') -I, ),G, S /'(0 <':)-I/-)- - <( (: ui 7 . _ : 7}:(~~~' ~:! '~'r::.. .:-.-, ...... . . ......,...,~,.~';.o.;-.. ~,/.,.. ~ ,t (t. ,",. '.\c" ........ "-- ..' -:~'" ~r" , "::.,;, . '.,. .... \-.- f1'Iol.'\.~~~ . .~.~. ".,,.. . "' '~ ":;....~-;"j;." ",,:v.-~..":........, ~~1; . '" "::It' ~,.'!. t"., ..~.. '~~., ~.... ~ 'I 1 \,:--.,::~,(t'f~'..t~~~::;"~J..~-"~~;.,,,~~~~t)~;'(t ~~\i~..:~~l.~~. \;~::;:,::.' ",~ ..... - ;-,"t'll.......,.I6; .". ... ,,~'. 'I! ';...."'..)..~"...lJ...r\...~Al\.i:."..+\\ ,... , ........ 'I"~", ,'>-' , " ',,'. ~\"" . o',t^ \.~J. 't,,~\.: y:' ",l.'^" .. Ji ~~. ./, ..- \ ~> <-~ f' l ~i.:. ::......n.'. ...l.~. ......'I.l.. )....\ '..':-!!....~..':........"l~.!_~~~~:...~' .... j,JI.,-"'t~:.~"': _~.. .;,\ ..........\ '111;.,-.~.....: ....\,. .,~!_,L' .;\l\ ,t.!I--"I'."'~..-.\.":'J\"""''j.. ',':~:'.~ .~ :"'"... ~~~.':';:~t" -..: i~.r' "'"., ';Ill-' "'''\, ^., .;: to.. "'~;"-,.\",,,,:},,.\"':~ '~;,_;'":'-:'_, ~ ~.1 ~ ,,,,,; _ (~ ....~".,,..,.. ... ; ~_ J . ' .'" .. . ~ ..,. '.' ~ ~ ~ \ f." ~,~ . .~; < ,"':''f..~\ '(. 'I' l..,..' _"I- Il.;,,' ,;,. " '~\"~A) ~ J .'" ,:\1.. :jflf .~,..".~...'..~.'>l,.1(,...:.:. ' , '.. ,~,. \ I'~ . Ii ,;/., fi} t ~ 't.,' :.-f f\ 'lc;' ~,J , l"!'~{~{~~"""",,"~' '-:.~ ;.;,,\~~ .. J . ~ ~,.., I i' I I -----1 ,'-1- !- .. . T ';'t '. .~ .~ C' ') -. \ , \i. -"~\ \ . * ..,.."~~.:.,. >.. .~ . .. ' \ '- ~-'- '.... ~, ~- '. \ xd/9 V.J7) ,-SY ~/ ~L2J ,:).8: - // '7 -c:>..,3 St6 -02rC;;ZO 19730 Sweetwater Curve 1993 $403,000 1994 $408,000 1995 $434,700 ( 1996 $443,000 A<' 1997 $471,000 k ,- ,\) l"Y Address LP SP ~'/B" FSF Lake Months 19730 SWC $439,000 $420,000 4/3 3730 y 5(8/93) 19645 SWC $419,900 $412,000 5/4 3950 N 1(10/96) 19600 SWC $459,900 $430,000 5/4 4170 y 2(8/96) 19635 SLT $524,900 $450,000 4/3 3324 N 8(2-97) 6160 SC $499,900 $465,000 4/4 4395 N 3(1-97) 6110 SWCR $485,000 $475,000 4/4 3543 N 3(3/96) 19840 SWC $735,000 $705,000 5/3 5810 y 9(9/96) 6200 SC $864,000 $845,000 5/7 7052 N 4 (1/96) 6145 SC $410,000 5/4 4200 N 11 19710 SWC $415,000 4/3 3196 y 6 19825 SWC $524,900 5/4 4748 N 7 19675 SLT $559,900 5/4 4552 N 5 Code SWC Sweetwater Curve SC Sierra Circle SLT Silver Lake Trail SWCR Sweetwater Circle 07/1<l5/95 16: 50 474 0128 2i: 612 SHOREWOOD CITY - P.01 " g JJlJ(t /)fj llil!! iii!! 1f'!!@1iI!J1J(4 -- l" .' '---" ~ "" ~ - ~'il , . i"...."'~ .'1 /Fi ".; , IOu ,is I I , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ c:::::!) .-.. ~'" "-" ,...~ .. - ~ ~2 ~ :J:i> 19 ~ ~ ( I &;I. I , 170___1 ': -.. Ik 8 "<t~, v", , ~~5 . " 8: ,.:-..rl I ",~~_ , , -'v.\ ',", " , " c:::::!l .- I~ , -- '- , l".r!\ : I~ "'~ ~ . . ".... . . ..".:, ~"J'..:, '. :"-' " >> 8 --:.. ... '\'0. ,'l' ~ ..:::..:..