The URL can be used to link to this page

051490 CC Reg AgP !;",y-~ .~,""";"';..ir-. ." :tt.., WIt .; l""-'\ "1:;.4 CITY OF SHORBNOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEB'1'IHG MONDAY, MAY 14, 1990 COtrttc:EL'. ..~J1\S 5755~Uft'l:Y:CLUD.~; 6:30P.M.' . 6:30PM 1. ~. CONVENE .--- 0: 55 AG8NPA. . ~41Qg7 . -U-. ~~b' C/;~ J~~ A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor ,I Brance1' Watten Haugen Ga9~e gt-Qvet B. ROLL CALL C. REVIEW AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES B. Regulat council Meeting ~ (:::~~,::::i~~~~;~~ (Att.NO. 2S-Minute$1. )~.' I I , ',' A. Regular council Meeting C. Board of Review - April 30, 1990 (Att.No.2C....Mintites) 3 . C;ONSENT AGE.NDA A. Approve Request for Water Hook-Up toChanhassen from~> < Larry Schmidt- 23115 Summit Avenue 'Y (Att. No .3A-Letter, MellO) . /ff~ Resolution Approving Final Payment to CBI-Na-Con for a~..'.'" ~ S. E. Area Elevat.ed Water Storage 'l'ank V (Att .No. 3B-TwoLet.ters't'1.~,l;J?ay.nt Voticher~ Resolution) .. 'I>/ .' Approve the Community Energy Council Program Agreel,nent. (Att.No.3C-LEi!tter & Agree~nt) /~" ~d1 (~) j)#- f'\ ~.. tV' '.' ' C' ~f' V.~. D. (At:t.No.4-Audit) 4. REVIEW 1~89 ANNUAL AUD1'1' REPUR'l' -GARY GRij.N"RO~ AND EICK .-<,-:_,_,-/,',,'b~ 5. REVIEW REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY.' OF · IRON REMOV~t".w"S()'T~~:~i:~',.ic FOR 'l'HF.; ~.E. ARSA WATER DISTRICT ..' ..... . ... .....<. "'7'; ./l~\,t" (Att.NO.5....R..~~t) -1- AGENDA - MONDAY, MAY 14, 1990 PAGE 2 7:30PM 6. APPEAL NOTICE TO REMOVE Applicant: Location: Larry Johnson 20820 Idlewild Path (Att.No.6-Appeal Lett.r) 1-. A~ APPEAL FOR EXTENSION TO WELL REQUIREMENT ()r. - if wf~vr ..~. A -' 1 (vi') 7. 8. (Att.No.8-Memo) 9. C.U.P. FOR ACCESSORY SPACE IN EXCI:l.SS OF 1000 (Att.No.9-Memo) Location: 5695 Howards Point Road Applicant:. Richard Gay 10. PROPOSALS FOR COMPUTERS (Att.No.lO-Memo) 11. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR 12. STAFF REPORTS 1. 6~! ~-? 1990 Street Improvement Bids 'J:> f'l"-5 ~. (j) ~q 7--' (Att.No.llA-l-Bid Tab) ! ()~) ft? 0;:' ~~ ~s ~~. Resolution Requesting Speed Zone Study on Near Mountain Blvd A. Engineer's Report 2. (At~.No.12A~2-Resolution) 3. Status of Glen Road Drainage Study B. 4. Proposal to Design and Construct Irrigation~.wr G f)o Freeman Park al..)' 1:;:t. ~4<i,.~ 5. Erosion Control - S.E. Area Water Tower l ~1 ~, Wi~~.~-~,~, ~NO.12A-5-Mem~.51/(?;, .... .. G Plarmi1bg Director' s ~epo~ "'"fo ~ :J~ wwL 1. Minnetonka Portable Dredging Dock License (A tt. No .12 B....I-LMCD M~er) ~ 2. Dock License Ik Applicant: ;j/s(~n: ~ Adeline Johnston 5465 Howards Point Road (Att.No.12B-2.LMCD Letter) -2- .,.c. " AGENDA - MONDAY, MAY 14, 1990 PAGE 3 12. STAFF REPORTS c. ~t)v!1 ~f . ,~/o 13. ~4. tS. B. Planning Director's Report - Continue 3. ~~:~~M~E;~;Z':a'^CY VehiCl~j~l{;S~':- ~....... rM} r. 5"'rI;TJVD1(.v'(Att.NO.12B-3-Staf'f1($pQ~ 4. Option on Bishop pro!'ert -~~/~~ A~O~eY~ ~e~::~:_:'E) 1. Code Amendment to Permit Composting of Yard Waste (Att. No .12C-l- Prp.Po,sed' Amendment) ~a--:!R-~. " 2. Summary of Rental Housing Code for Publication G--~ ~(~~~~2p~p~~1,1mmary) 3. Ordinance Amendment - Christmas Lake Access .5-rj tho _(~12C-3-pro!>osed Amend!llentJ Administrator's Report D. . 1. School District Interest in Tax Forfieted Property (Att.No.12D-l-Staff Report) COUNCIL REPORTS · Jk,'._A^~~~ ~---#'~~-'" ~...~..'f} / . p~ :, .#J/C tJJ.J( . Recor~ iJ~/ ~t:f.;A~ lWr. A. MAYOR HAUGEN 1. Policy on City B. COUNCIL MEMBERS ADJOURN SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF CLAIMS (Att.No.14-Claimst e!f. ~Cjx--r I V 6 S~b/uJ CALENDAR May 28, 1990 - Memorial Day - NO MEETING June 4, 1990 - Council workshop - Policies on Meeting Length - TIF Development Agreement - Maybe - Elderly Housing - Update on Comparable Worth/Pay Plan June 11, 1990 - Regular Council Meeting June 18, 1990 - (1) - Joint Park/Council Meeting - (2) - Water Study Policy June 25, 1990 - Regular Council Meeting -3- r. ..' . COUkCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:30 PM CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Haugen called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Haugen opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Haugen, Councilmembers Gagne, Stover, Brancel and Watten; Administrator Whittaker; Attorney Froberg; Engineer Norton; Planner Nielsen; Finance Director Rolek; and Assistant Clerk Niccum APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to approve the minutes of April 9, 1990 with the following amendments: Page 6 - Dock License Renewals - line 3 Spelling correction - conforming, not confirming Public Works Site Option Cross considered the City's offer, ...... ........... ..... Page 7 - Spring Cleanup addition - Spring Cleanup - Saturday & Sunday - May 5 & 6 - 8:00am-5:00pm Motion carried - 5/0. Minutes of March 12, 1990, will be prepared for the next meeting. AGENDA REVIEW Watten moved, Brancel seconded, to approve the Agenda with the following cbanges: Item #10A3--addition--Finamart Update Item #10A2b-postponement of Lot 9, Deephaven Shores Acres, water service connection Item #10D3--Additional information Motion carried - 5/0. -1- '> 0;/3 . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page two CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION NO. 33-90 Watten moved, Brancel seconded, to approve: adoption of Resolution No. 33-90 - "A Resolution Approving Final Payment Voucher No. 3 in the amount of $1,981.50 to Visu Service Clean & Seal, Inc., 2849 Hedbey Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55343-9940 for City of Shorewood Project No. 89-2"; a purchase order for MnDOT-MSA computer work station, printer and software; an extension to Bruce Prescher for filing a Simple Subdivision (6060 Lake Linden Drive) no later than Friday, May 25, 1990; and, Smithtown Road street signs at all cross-streets between Country Club Road and the ShorewoodlExcelsior border on County Road 19. Motion carried by roll call vote - 5/0. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT No meeting. PARK COMMISSION Park Commissioner Laberee was present as liaison to the City Council. He reported on the following: Skating Rinks Three rink attendants were present to talk to the Park Commission regarding the rinks. They discussed problems, maintenance, and results. The temporary warming house at Manor Park was well received, no negative comments were made, but many favorable ones were given. Cathcart Field Relocation-South Tonka Little League South Tonka Little League wanted to come in and strip the infield 8" and lay aglime. The Commission discussed the 1987 plan for relocating the field now-due to the fact that otherwise it would mean moving the aglime and redigging the 81t in another spot. Now they have decided to wait until Fall, or next year. They will wet the infield and roll it. They will repair the backstop, and put in player's benches. Freeman Park - Little League Field Dugout Laberee suggested that Zdrazil look at the dugout site. He felt that if it is rebuilt with concrete blocks, they should be filled with concrete. He said it broke easily because the blocks were hollow. Council suggested Watten work with the Commission to come up with a recommendation. Park Dedication Fees The Commission has discovered the current park fees are low. They will be coming to the Council with a survey and recommendation. -2- REGULAR COUNCIL ME~NG MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page three . PARK REPORT - continued Joint Meeting Request Laberee said the Commission has requested a joint meeting with the City Council to discuss various issues. Council directed Niccum to talk to the Commission and the Council, and set up a meeting. Bases - Freeman Park and Manor Park There was a motion from the Park Commission to purchase bases for the three new softball fields at Freeman Park, and the field at Manor Park, with a cost not to exceed $1000. The cost is $265 per field for the 3 Freeman fields. Manor will be a little cheaper because they do not need a double-base at homeplate. Gagne moved, BraDcel seconded, to approve the purchase of the bases for Freeman Park' g- new softball fields, and the Manor ballfield, not to exceed a cost of $1,000. Motion carried - 5/0. APPROVAL OF C.U.P. FOR EXCELSIOR COVENANT CHURCH RESOLUTION NO. 34-90 Brancel moved, Stover seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 34-90 - itA Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Excelsior Covenant Church". . MotioD carried by roll call vote - 510. Stover asked if the certificate of occupancy would be held until the2 1an..dscap-ing and s i te_ improvements_ are completed. Planner Nielsen- saia that was the recommendation of the Planning Commission. APPROVAL OF A C.U.P. FOR FILL AND GRADING FOR BOULDER BRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION NO. 35-90 '\-1atten moved, Brancel seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 35-90 - "A Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit for Filling and Grading to Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc.". Motion carried by roll call vote - 5/0. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR One resident asked if he could have a copy of the draft Tax Increment Financing Resolution before the hearing began. Attorney Froberg gave him one. Another resident asked if he had to be signed up in order to speak, because he didn't know what issues would come up, and if he would wish to do so. ~ayor Haugen suggested he sign up. When his name was called, he could decline if he didn't wish to speak. Council Break -7:50PM - 8:00PM -3- iEGULAR COUNCIL MEEIG . MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1 0 Page four PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED DESIGNATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. I, THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I, LOCATED WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. I, AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1 Brancel moved to indefinitely postpone the public hearing so that the City caD educate the community. and answer all the questions and concerns of the citizens, because she had received numerous calls from residents who were not involved with Waterford or with Tax Increment Financing, and do not have any knowledge of what TIF (Tax Increment Financing) is. Motion died for lack of a second. Mayor Haugen opened the public hearing at 8:02PM. She then introduced Mr. Robert Thistl~ from Springsted Compan~ who is very familiar with TIF and has worked with it for many years. A resident, who did not identify himself, asked if they would be able to ask the consultant questions. Mayor Haugen said "yes - during the public portion of the hearing, and after Thistle has given an explanation~ Thistle said the7ax Increment Financing project is basically a process that has been established by state government to allow cities to fund a variety of projects that they may ordinarily be unable to fund because of limited resources or provisions of law that prohibits the use of other funding mechanisms because all the conditions for its use are not met. A tax increment project allows the City to capture the increased tax value from new development in a defined TIF district and use those new taxes to pay for improvements in the TIF project area. Taxes on the district area before development continue to be shared with all taxing districts. The value of this existing area is adjusted each year using a factor of the average inflation over the previous five years. This increased value on the existing property also continues to go to all the taxing districts. There are several types of TIF Districts that can be established: housing districts, soil districts, redevelopment districts, and economic development districts. This project is being developed as an economic development district. This type of district's time length is 10 years, and the way the State tax structure works, the City could only capture the taxes for eight years. Within the tax increment law, cities are allowed to apply that incremental tax growth to a variety of activities. They can either be public activities such as sewer, streets, water, sidewalks, trees, or other City projects in the project area; or, they can be applied to the developer's project. The City Council, in November of last year, approved the nevelopment Stage Plahs for the project- agreeing on its land use, pUblic improvements, and zoning. They then directed staff to look at different types of funding for the public improvements. The Council and staff then looked at a number of alternatives; General Fund, ad valorem taxes, assessments, and Tax Increment Financing. They directed staff to pursue and develop the potential of using TIF to pay for the public improvements that are associated with this project. None of the TIF money is going into the internal improvements. -4- REGULAR COUNCIL MEEaG MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page five . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTICT NO. 1 - continued Robert Thistle The City then asked Springsted to assist them in assessing whether or not the increased value of the project would generate sufficient taxes to pay for the improvements over the ten year period. In Springsted's findings it appears that, based on the proposed project and the value of that project, sufficient funds are available. If the City Council approves the TIF District and plan, the next step would be to negotiate a development agreement with the developer. This would layout improve- ments to be made, the developer's responsibilities, and the City's role. This contract would be reviewed by the City Council, Bonding Counsel, Attorney, and staff. At that point the City would be able to move ahead. If a district is approved this evening~ and the development contract and the assessment agreement cannot be negotiated, the development agreement could be negotiated with another buyer at another time. Jay Wein - 5305 ElmridgeCircle asked if Springsted has a vested interest in this transaction, or if their conclusions are independent. A resident that did not identify himself, asked if they would be involved initially in the "bond, or doing any of that work after this meeting. Mayor Haugen said it is her opinion that they will be assisting the City in selling the bonds. Wein - will they be compensated for that? Haugen - they get compensated for whatever they do, just like anyone else. They have been doing this for the City for many years. Robert Thistle of Springsted said they are an independent financial adviser. They do not at any time own, buy, or service bonds. What they do is review whether or not the financing the City is proposing to do is in the City's best interests. If the City chose to move ahead with the process, they, on behalf of the City, would take it to market independentlx, and take bids on that issue. They would recommend, based on the low bid, who should be selected. Residents then asked how much Springsted had made so far, and what they stand to make if this goes through. A resident said that generally, in a business setting, when you have a consultant that is going to make a recommendation, they should be independent of the rest of the process. Haugen reiterated that the City has followed this procedure for years, and most cities do it this way. Haugen reminded the residents that they are limited to 3 minutes, a group representative will receive 10 minutes. Bruce Ebner - 5670 Vine Hill Road said it was determined in 1984 when Waterford was being planned that the intersection would be required. The intersection haB been re-evaluated and is still needed. He urged the Council to vote for TIF. -5- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET. MONDAY, APRIL 23, 19 Page six . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Ja -6- . . CITY OF SBOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING M.ONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page seven TIP - ESTABLI SBM.ENTOF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Lea Anderson - 5385 Shady Hills Circle - said tbe allusion bas been mc:de that the intersection is for tbe business development only. It is b~s understanding tbat the idea is safe roads. He said tbe City of Chaska gets $.65 for every $1.00 in commercial development and it sbould work about tbe same for Sborewood. He is for tbe intersection and the TIF. He said it is important.tbat the TIF be done properly buvurged tbe City to vote for it. ' Rick Rosow-19835 Waterford Place said he is against TIF as p:"oposed. He had reviewed Springsted's plan. He questions certain statements: reducing employment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor, and other human resources in the City; owners of property within the development district will be encouraged to rehabilitate their property...; the City may provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from State, Federal, and Local Services. When you read the plan as a whole it doesn't make sense. He asked the developer if he would be willing to personally, as an individual, guarantee the assessment agreement. He asked if the City would be willing .to hire an appraiser of its choosing to appraise the: fair market value of that property, and compare it to the selling price of the property to determine whether the statements that the project would not advance without this funding are correct. He urged the City to only use tax increment bonds that are revenue generated, rather than general obligation generated so that the burden, if there is a default, falls on the investors rather than on the taxpayers of the City. He urged the City to consult with other cities to see how they insured themselves against losses, and if they have incurred any. He said after these things have been done, to go ahead. Gagne asked Rosow if he would be interested in getting involved? Rosow said after hearing some of the remarks tonight, he would have to think about whether it would be a "conflict of interest". Patrick Nalmsten-Sbady Hills related to the bistory of all tbe meetings beld before the development. He said all the people surrounding the development were aware of the intersection. He referred to all the people that had presented such eloquent speeches with such detail this evening, and really questioned why these people that spent such large amounts of money did not bother to find out where the road was going when they bought their property He feels now they are trying to blame it on something else. He said he doesn't know all the details of TIF but he is for the project and for the intersection. He said tbeWaterford residents should handle their own traffic. Roy Seamans-Seamans Drive asked what shape the City is in financially? Haugen said the City is in good" shape. He said he felt there is too much building going on. Simon Oosterman-19365 Waterford Place- said he has always been for the intersection. He said if the City does have to pay for it, thats a large amount of money and maybe they should see if they can do without the intersection, however if they do decide to put it in, he agrees with Rosow. the City should use revenue generated bonds, not general obligation bonds. -7- ;REGULAR COUNCIL MEEING M.ONDAY, APRIL 23, 1 Page eight . TIF - ESTABLISHING DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Ed Bergslein-24785 Smithtown Road said he is against TIF, if the developer wants it, let him pay for it, not the taxpayers. Jay Wein-5305 Elmridge Circle~. said he came because of the letter. He wondered if the Councilwas forthcoming in preparing that document, that caused him to come. He said he is against the proposal. He said it says very specifically in the letter that the City required the developer to provide a collector street. He said in the next paragraph it says the TIF includes the completion of the collector street. He said either the developer pays for it or he doesn't. He said the developer could provide for a performance bond. If it is too expensive for the developer to do this, it is too expensive for the taxpayers to do this. Louise Bonach-19625 Sweetwater Curve-representing a group of people that are concerned that the Council is acting fiscally irresponsibly by using TIF to subsidize the intersection. They believe the community has many other uses for the increased .tax dollars. The group realizes that the City can put in the intersection, and can implement the TIF, however, the group has found something they can do that the City cannot control, they will boycott the businesses associated with the development. They want to know why ~he developer can't pay for the project. They feel the money generated from the development should go for roads, water improve ments, and education. Penny Vogel-Minnetonka Blvd said the smell in her house from cars starting and stopping at existing intersections is bad enough, another intersection is not needed. She also said that her house had been left to her so she could live in it the rest of her life, but due to constantly rising taxes, when her husband retires they will have to sell their home and move out of Shorewood. Kathy Hare read Jay Hare's list of questions (attached) Gary Swanson-19535.Vine Ridge Road is opposed to TIF. The City of Minn- etonka just voted d0wn a similar project. He feels TIF is inappropriate. Who will benefit? Does the Council think the majority of the population wants TIF? He says go with the majority. Who will pay? No one wants to pay more taxes, including the Council. He asked the Council to get more facts and information. Jim Slaughter-5570 Old Ma.rket Road referred to paragraph 5 in the City letter where the City said they will own all the improvements-he asked how they could own part of Highway 7? He said MnDOT can bulldoze this intersection before it is completed, and they intend to do so. The "strip mall" will go right down the drain and we'll all be in trouble. He said he hopes the Council will decide tonight not to use TIF. If they do he is determined the City will not use TIF. The people that signed the petition are going to make sure that TIF is not viable. They don't want this--they will keep coming back--they are funded--they are determined its not needed--its not wise. Bob Snyder-19855 Chartwell Hill-who is on the Financial Advisory Board, referred to the City Letter. He said it says in 1984 the City entered into a contractual agreement with the developers of Waterford, then at the bottom it seems to infer that the agreement was to help finance that intersection. He quoted from a letter from Attorney Froberg date 8/25 (no year) "the City shall pursue the availability of outside funding". -8- REGULAR COUNCIL MI~S MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1~ Page nine . TIF - ESTABLISH DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Bob Snyder-continued He said it does not say the City shall be required to pursue the funding, it says they will pursue it. He did not know if thp Council was aware that the Financial Advisory Board was convened by Alan. Three issues were discussed, one was whether or not they would give blanket approval for TIF? The Board said no, they would not, each development had to be evaluated on its merits. He said you don't take a prime piece of real estate along Highway 7 and turn it into TIF. He asked the Mayor and Council if they were aware of what was going on in the Legislature today? Haugen said yes, they are. He explained to the audience that the Legislature is considering a "but for" clause for TIF, meaning "but for" TIF, the property would not be developed. He submits that this property would develop without TIF. He submitted a list of questions to the Council .attached to and hereby made a part of these minutes. Amy Burchardt-6050 McKinley Place~ said she is against TIF. What is it going to do for the residents? Its strictly a business venture that is going to be profiting, she isn't, put she's going to be the one getting increased taxes, .she has every year, and wanted to know how many years that will be going on. David Dean-5690 Old Market Road said TIF is to be used for decayed, depressed, dilapidated areas. This does not fall into this catagory. He pointed out that people from neighborhoods other than Watertord are here objecting to TIF. He said this does affect everyone in Shorewood. He also said that taxes in Shorewood affect both young and old, no one will be able to stay here long if taxes keep going up. The developer has said this "strip mall" is for the neighborhood, he has based his projections on neighborhood use. He said the developer has to have the intersection because if TIF is used the neighborhood will not support the "strip mall". He said speed vs.careful deliberation is another issue. He said the City may deliberate on this for months, then the Legislature may kick it right out of existence. He said some valid questions and risks have been discussed here tonight. Robert Daugherty-19670 Sweetwater Curve asked what the average "strip mall" rents are in western suburbs. He understood that they are $10-12 and the developer is asking $14. He felt the developer was asking high rents because of the high land price. He referredto several malls in the area, saying they are not fully rented. He said the City seems willing to deliver the traffic to the developers door. He felt that the developer should guarantee 90% rental prior to TIF. He said if the development was economically viable the developer could provide a letter of credit and TIF would not be necessary. If the project fails, it will create an imbalance in money slated for the County, School District, City and other things, who makes up the difference? He also mentioned that the City has a triple A bond rating, and wondered if they would jeopardize this through TIF. Karen Sigmund-Echo Road said she is a business woman in Excelsior. Excel- sior, 7 Hi, westwind Plaza, and the new center on 7 and 41 are all having a tough time. The City better make sure there is a need for this before they become "over-maIled". Mayor Haugen closed the public hearing at 9:55PM. -9- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET. MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page ten . Council Break 9:55 - 10:05 TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Gagne suggested they begin answering questions. Haugen began on the "Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Questions" submitted by Jay Hare (attached). Question No.1 Haugen - Any services will be paid residential or commercial people. developed, there will be taxes and needs just like the rest of us do, kids in school anymore. One resident said that isn't fair, all the taxes developed will go to payoff the bonds. for by Shorewood taxpayers, be they When the multi-family portion is they will pay part of the school even though some of us don't have Haugen - the origipal portion of the development will be assessed by the Hennepin County Assessor. He will decide what the value of the land is, he will then assess the value, and a portion will go to the schools, the City, and the County according to the percentage that is there now. He will also put on an inflationary value of 13.7% every year, which is more than others go up every year, on that original portion. Wein - thats still misleading, what you're talking about is an incon- sequencial amount in relation to what we are really talking about. You are absolutely and intentially misleading. Haugen - Intentionally misleading you how? Wein - to even remotely allude to the fact that the amount of taxes that will be assigned by the Hennepin County Assessor will even remotely pay for the cost of educating any number of children that would be housed in multiple family dwellings. Haugen said they have no way of knowing - even if there will be any kids in the housing. Thistle said Springsted structured the TIF Plan on revenues from the commercial value and the property that was improved and does not include taxes from residents. They took the position of very conservative construction. They could not guarantee how fast those housing units would develop. Assuming any of the residential units get built, the increment that you see from them will be much higher than~ what's projected The point that you are making is if there is a child in one of those units, that a base tax on the unit will not support that child in the school system. That's a fair assumption. However, the City Council could pass some of that tax back through to school districts and County when they have met their base obligation in paying for the TIF bonds. -10- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET,A MONDAY, APRIL 23, 19~ Page eleven . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Question No.2 Haugen - the improvements that we are making are public improvements. It's an intersection. We are not paying for any improvements on the property itself, the developer has to do that himself. These are only public improvements that we are using the TIF for. Hare asked if it wasn't common procedure for the developer to pay for the roads. Didn't they do so in the other developments in the area. Haugen said they required the developer to put in a collector street with the understanding that the City would help with the intersection. Hare asked, if each developer is required, according to Shorewood's policy, to put in their own streets, then whose development is Waterford III Haugen said the intersection is everybody's, it's there to direct the traffic out of all of those areas. A resident suggest~d they take a vote on who wanted the intersection. He said they didn't. Haugen said there are those who do, and the Council will do the voting. One resident informed Haugen that might be true, but they would be doing the voting in the Fall. Haugen said that was their privilege. Question 2b Attorney Froberg said that Chapter 429 provides that special assessments must benefit the property, and the property would have to be shown to appreciate in value to the extent of the improvement. Haugen said that this will not be applicable in this situation. Question 2c Haugen said she thought that it was a matter of opinion that the City is lining the pockets of Trivesco. It isa fact that Trivesco did place some of the assessments for your property on the front portion of the development. this is some of the cost that Sherman-Boosalis has to deal with. A resident said, then, the property is overpriced. Haugen said she is not saying it is overpriced because she does not even know what the price of the property was. This means the residents do not have to pay as much in assessments as they would have had to pay if this had been spread over the residential area. A resident asked if the developer owns the property or if it is subject to Council approval with a purchase agreement? -11- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET. APRIL 23, 1990 Page twelve . TIF - ESTABLISHING DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Attorney Froberg said the developer had a purchase agreement to purchase the property subject to certain contingencies, the agreement set a certain time limit. George Sherman of Sherman-Boosalis said Shernam-Boosalis has a contract to purchase the property from Trivesco, and with that contract to purchase they are purchasing certain development rights and contract obligations that Trivesco entered into in 1984. Specifically in that original development contract was an approved P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) that called for multi-family housing on this site along with commercial devleopment on Highway 7. Our proposal that was submitted to the City over 15 months ago included developing multi-family housing at a lesser density and commercial as it applied to the original 1984 P.U.D. We have met those obligations. The original development contract also said that Trivesco, the developer, would put in a collector street, and that the City would assess the cost of the intersection against all who benefited. What was used to determine "all who benefited" was a traffic study that said that unless there was an intersection at this location, the City should not go ahead with Water ford and the rest of the development at that site. It's been our position all along that the intersection benefits, at least~ people beyond the Waterford neighborhood. It benefits all the development that has occurred since 1984. The property value is an appropriate property value for the parcel. It's zoned for multi-family and commercial, and includes the intersection as was approved in the 1984 development contract. Another question came up that Springsted addressed briefly, is the risk to the City on this particular project for TIF. The values used in the Springsted study anticipate only raw lots, no buildings. If a child is going to be going to school you assume he will be living in a building. If a house is built on the lot, that additional tax increment is going to be available to the City above and beyond what is needed to pay for the bond. A resident asked if they would supply a performance bond that would prevent financial risk to the City? Sherman said they wouldpro~de guarantees that the multi-family housing and the commerical that were part of the TIF plan would be developed. He said the City has asked them for a variety of guarantees. He expects these will be up for public review if the TIF is passed. Sherman-Boosalis has offered a level of guarantees that they think will be necessary to pay the bonds off. They are talking about actually having the improvements built, that kind of guarantee. Hare said they want iron clad guarantees, why should they take any risks? Sherman said two reasons--one, you don't have to take any risks if there are appropriate guarantees from the developer; and, two, it is an obliga- tion of the City to provide financing for this project by assessing all that benefit from this intersection. Hare asked if the developer is "putting the screws to the City", how is the City responding? Haugen said the developer is not "putting the screws to the City". When the 1984 development agreement was approved, the City agreed to certain things. -12- REGULAR COUNCIL HEE1A; MONDAY, APRIL 23, 19~ Page thirteen . TIF - ESTABLISHING DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Attorney Froberg said the development agreement speaks of this specific- ally in two places: "the original development agreement states that the City should pursue the availability of outside funding for the funding of the Old Market Road/State Highway 7 intersection. It also states that the City staff, City Council, City consultants and developer will at all times expedite all work involved in the development of the property and any development in execution of the proposed Highway 7 intersection. It does not specifically determine how the intersection is to be financed, but states that the developer sball share in the cost. We could legally assess any property that benefits from the intersection. Haugen said the City does not chose to use this option. Penny Vogel talked about the previous plan for the mall and asked why it was turned around. Haugen said the developer had the right to design the mall as he wished to, providing it met City code, and this is what he did. P. Vogel said you. couldn't do anything unless MnDOT had given approval. Haugen said that's right--and MnDOT did approve of the intersection. Hare said Sherman had said there would be guarantees, and he'd like to hear what those guarantees are, or "is he going to give us the keys to his Mercedes"? Haugen said this part of the meeting is for Council deliberation, the residents have had their chance to speak, now it's the Council's turn. Question 3 George Sherman said again that it is the developer's opinion that the development contrac~ between Trivesco and the City anticipates and calls for the intersection to be installed as part of the total development district. The cost of that intersection is to be borne by all who benefit from the development of Waterford. The cost of that intersection was not to be borne by commercial property alone. The value of that property is based upon the intersection being in there. Question 4a Administrator Whittaker said there is risk in every type of financing: special assessments and G.O. Bonds, or if people don't pay their taxes. A resident asked what the risks are in special assessments. Whittaker said if the as~nts are not paid, the City bears the cost. It's is up to the City C~to decide what part of a public improvement is attributable to a development, what part is attributable to a neighbor- hood, and what part belongs to the entire City. -13- REGULAR COUNCIL KEE~ MONDAY, APRIL 23, 19~ Page fourteen . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Hare, again speaking out of order, referred to a memo of August 24, 1989 written by Whittaker,' stating the developer has agreed to be assessed a portion of the cost in building this intersection. However, Chapter 429 of the State statute does not permit special assessments in excess of the actual increased value of the property. The increased property value to the developer and other parcels would not be sufficent to justify assess- ment of the entire cost. He said in other words - it's overpriced. Whittaker said that is not the conclusion of that memo. He suggested the hearing return to the City Council so they can deliberate on the questions. Hare again interrupted to say that if the Council wants to serve the pur- pose of a kangaroo court, that's just fine. Whittaker said this has been discussed since July, 1989. There have been three major public hearings and four other public meetings on it. A resident said what about answering the questions. Haugen said the Council listened to the public. Now it is the Council's time. They are trying to answer the questions, but due to constant inter- ference, it has been difficult to do so. Whittaker said the entire cost cannot be assessed back to the-project. All the internal costs of the development are still being borne by the developer. A part of the cost was never included in the cost for the TIF District. Just so the public is aware of that. Question 4b Thistle said at one work session we looked at pay-as-you-go because it would be the preferable way to finance. The problem that arose is that in pay-as-you-go, the developer has to own the property. They take a note on that private property, and the City issues a revenuen~t~ to them which is taken to the bank" to borrow money to pay for whatever improvements are done. In this case they would be public improvements; so this is not a practical approach. The developer would have no collateral for a loan. The Council is now deliberating on TIF. If they pass it, the next step is the development agreement which is negotiated between the City and the developer. Thistle said, after this meeting tonight, he feels in a stronge^ position on the part of the City to negotiate what some of the conditions are. Nothing has been discussed in any detail as yet. The City can negotiate for a number of things: assessment, letter of credit, cash, and securities. The numbers put in the plan are very conservative, they are the minimum numbers that are needed to make it work. You will also see the TIF Plan does not include inflation in the value of the improvement. You know that in 10 years that property is going to increase in value from inflation as well as construction. Attorney Froberg - answering a resident that asked if there would be another public hearing - said there will not be another public hearing. He said the development agreement would be drafted based on the project requirements. It would also include time of completion, the time of commencement, the amount of secutity, and type of protection the City would get, which items would be negotiated primarily between the staff and the -14- REGULAR COUNCIL MEEAc MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1~~ Page fifteen TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO.1-continued . developer, and subject to approval by the Council. It would be an open Council meeting but not a public hearing. If the Council passes the Resolution approving the plan tonight, it does not mean that tbe project would necessarily go ahead, only that the tax increment district would be in place. IF an agreement were reached with the developer a number of steps would have to be taken. A TIF assessment agreement would have to be prepared and approved. A TIF development agreement would also have to be drafted and approved. These things would have to be done subsequent to any action taken tonight. If there is a breakdown on any of the steps along the way the project will not go through. Froberg said that notice of all meetings will be properly given. Wein said he is still confused as to whether the City has a contractual obligation or not. He felt the City should not move forward until they are sure of that. He said sitting still has a lot of merit. That would leave the City negotiating with weakness rather than strength, and they need to be on the other side of the coin. Attorney Froberg referred to the amended development agreement of August 12, 1985. .Members of the audience said they did not understand what he was saying. Froberg read the terms of the agreement several times and some members of the audience still said they did not understand whether the City was responsible for the financing. Froberg said that decision had been made that the City would participate in the funding and the only issue to be decided is whether or not to pass a Resolution to put a TIF District into place. Bonach said the Council isn't listening to them. The Council said they have listened to them---that they are supposed to be listening to the whole City---thats what they are doing. Question - Why is the City rush inK this a10nK anyway? Haugen said the City has not been rushing this along: September 12, 1989 the Planning Commission held a hearing at the school; October 24, 1989 the hearing continued, and the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council; November 13, 1989 the Council reviewed the recommendations, and agreed on the conditions for approval of Water ford III; November 20, 1989 the Council reviewed the findings of fact and adopted Resolution No. 99-89 including the project; February 1, 1990 the Council had a 4 hour workshop to review options for financing the public improvements in the Southeast Area and Waterford III, and ordered a draft TIF plan; March 19, 1990 The Council had another long meeting for review of the draft TIF plan, and adopted Resolution 29-90 setting tbis public bearing on the plan; the Council reviewed an EAW and passed another Resolution declaring an EAW unnecessary, they have had review after review, they've studied at home, read pros and cons, and, now, they are trying to make a decision on whether TIF is a viable solution. -15- REGULAR COUNCIL MEAm MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page sixteen . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Stover said one way they could finance would be a General Obligation Bond, she said this means we pledge the assets of the City to repay a bond and we acquire the right to pay the bond by your taxes, everybody's. Another way would be to assess the benefited properties. This appears to be an extremely difficult way to do it, almost impossible. We could attempt to fund it from the General Fund, this is money you have already paid in taxes, but this would mean we'd have to replenish it with more of your tax dollars. Whittaker said we are still pursuing MnDOT's participation regarding the servic roads along Highway 7. Stover said that if the Council establishes TIF District, one of the things they want to try to do is use the additional revenue, if there is any, for other public improvements. She said the estimates from Springsted were very conservative. The public projects considered were a water treatment plant, park improvements, and turning some of the funds back to the County.and School District. She made it very clear that she was not promising these things, but that they had been discussed. She said they would like very much to have the developer and MnDOT pay part of- the cost, the City would still have some financia obligation. She said, at the workshop; the Council had decided that. TIF had the least impact on all the residents. She said if no buildings were put on the land, the County and the School District would still get what they are getting now, if buildings are put on the land, in the future "the School District will end up with more money. She said by using TIF the City did not make people that don't live in the area, and don't benefit from it, pay for it. Stover told the residents that the whole Council has acquired as much informa- tion as possible on this, besides the workshops, they have talked with consult- ants, and gathered information individually. A resident asked what was wrong with waiting 6 months or a year to see if MnDOT and the developer would raise their levels of monetary participation. Stover said they will continue to look into funding sources, they are not deciding a dollar figure tonight, only whether or not to establish a district. Haugen said the City has to participate to some extent. MnDOT has their funds allocated years in advance, and their percentage of participating with cities is not that ~mv. She said because the City population reached 5,000, the state aid for highways was increased considerably. That was considered but there are other streets in the City that need repair at this time. Many different ways have been considered. The Council has been trying to find a way so the burden did not fall upon the taxpayers, and that it did fall upon the developer. By TIF and working with the development agreement, it was the Council's opinion that this would be the best way to do it. When they negotiate with the developer, many things will be considered, one of them a letter of credit, which was mentioned tonight. Some of the other things men- tioned tonight have also been discussed. Before they can negotiate with the developer, a district has to be established. Hare referred to the Legislative deliberation on TIF, and asked the entire CounO[ individually if TIF was declared illegal by the Legislature if they would still do it. The entire Council said if it was illegal, they would not even vote on it. -16- . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINr.... MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990"" Page seventeen . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Stover told Hare that she did not feel they were talking about the same thing, he keeps referring to the "strip mall", she is talking about the intersection and other public improvements. Watten said he would like a little more proof than Hare's opinion about what is going on in the Legislature. He said the City has an obligation to investi- gate financing. Gagne said it is his job to make sure that the negotiations with the developer will protect the City and the taxpayers. Brancel said she is against TIF, and was not in favor of the intersection. Stover said according to the original development contract they had to start building in a certain year, 1990, and the City can not hold up the developer. Stover said the things the City is attempting to finance are public improvement. such as service roads, the intersection, water, sidewalks, Clnd .possibly park improvements. A resident asked if the program is sucessful, can the payment schedule be accelerated? Thistle said yes. Another resident asked if the "strip mall" was dropped, would the" intersection still go in? The answer was yes. Brancel moved that the Council wait until the Legislature acts before ruling on TIF. Motion died for lack of a second. Gagne said the City is obligated to put in the intersection. Sherman said he had wanted to start building by this Spring. He also said TIF is a viable method of financing .the public improvements. Brancel moved, Gagne seconded for discussion purposes, that the Council answer the questions received. V()n: /Jz;NIt:,i:> 1- V Stover said she would be glad to answer the questions if the members of the audience that kept interrupting would be quiet and let the Council answer the questions, Watten agreed and asked why they couldn't abide by the rules. Could the TIF affect the bond rating of the City? Thistle said the individual development agreements are looked at to reach this decision. Thistle said, regarding rental capacity, that the City can set a policy requir- ing a rentage percentage, Springsted uses a minimum of 65%. He said you also consider the lease length. Hare again called the Council a kangaroo court. Attorney Froberg, when asked, said he could have a draft of a development agreemenc ready by the next meeting. He has been working with the League of Minnesota Cities on the agreement. -17- REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN~ MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page eighteen . TIF - ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 - continued Thistle said the Council will review the proposed development contract after this evening's comments to see if they want to make any changes. Sherman said he has three leases, and several letters of intent. He said they plan to rent to high quality professionals. Hare continued to interrupt and harrass the Council at 12:02PM. even though he was-repeatedly told the public portion of the hearing was closed. stover moved, Watten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 36-90 - "A Resolution Designating and Establishing Development District No.1; Establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 located within Development District No.1; and approving and adopting the Development District Program for Development District No. 1 including Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.1". Stover asked what this committed the City to. L Fri. e L WIi.. I P I ~ 161.J Thistle said if the City decided not to carry it any farther, they could pass a resolution recindiQg the action and certify it to the County. Motion carried bv roll call vote - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Brancel Council Break 12:15 - 12:20 The following items will be dealt with at the next meeting: 7E and 7F. Applicant: Location: TO REMOVE Darlene Y./~~ann 4830 Fernc~nrive APPEAL NOTICE Stover moved, Gagne seconded, to postpone the Appeal to Remove for Darlene Dol1man, 4830 Ferncroft Drive, until Monday, April 30, 1990 at 7:00PM. Motion carried - 5/0. STAFF REPORTS ATTORNEY'S REPORT Agreement for Water Service to Deephaven Attorney Froberg drew thp Council's attention to certain parts of the agree- ment. He said any extension that the City of Deephaven wishes to make to the water system have to be approved by the City of Shorewood, primarily the City Engineer, to make sure the existing system will handle it. He said all residents, outside of those in Amesbury North, would be required to pay a $4,000 hookup charge. He also said that it is important for the City of Deephaven to understand that if they put in a water system at a later date, the $4,000 fee paid to the City of Shorewood will not be refunded. The City of Shorewood will not terminate water to anyone that has paid the $4,000 fee. The users in Amesbury North are excluded because they have already been assessed. -18- . .- REGULAR COUNCIL MEET MONDAY, APRIL 23, 199 Page nineteen . STAFF REPORTS - ATTORNEY'S REPORT - Agreement for Water Service to Deephaven Stover asked Engineer Norton about the pump. Norton said that had been one of his concerns when he received the contract. He said they will have the cost estimates to the City soon, they are working on them. A rough estimate was $50,000-100,000. Norton said there are only one or two people outside of Amesbury North that will be hooking up. Whittaker questioned whether there was a provision in the contract for controlling individual hookups where no extension is required. Council asked Attorney Froberg to add a provision to this affect in the agreement. Gagen moved, Branee! seconded, to approve the Agreement for. Water Servic;.e to the City of Deephaven. Motion carried - 5/0. Water Hookup - Lot 2, Block 1, Sutherlin Addition - 4715 Old Kent Road Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to apprive a hookup of Lot 2, Block 1. Sutherlin Addition-4115 Old Kent Road into the Shorewood water system contingent upon Deephaven's approval of the Agreement for water service to Deephaven. Motion carried - 5/0. Finamart Update YES Property is now composed of Larry Youngsted and Mr. Eastland. Froberg:-.:-. talked with Larry Youngsted on Thursday. Youngsted said they are working to payoff all the leins on the property and they will be able to file a plat without any encumberances except for possible mortgage encumberances which would also be co-signers on the plat, and they will be able to file that within 60-90 days. Gagne asked if their final blacktopping was done because it is so uneven. Planner Nielsen will check into this. Brancel asked what happens with the Dairy Queen foundation? Haugen said we are stuck with it. Brancel said next time an Occupancy Permit should be held. Gagne asked about the aeration. Nielsen will check on it. ENGINEER'S REPORT Postponed until next meeting ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Proposals for Yard Waste Collection and Disposal Postponed until next meeting Option for Public Works Site Administrator Whittaker brought the Council up-to-date on the option. Gagne moved, Watten seconded, that the Administrator and the Planner talk to Mr. Cross and offer him $150,00 for the property, Mr. Cross keeps the trees, a restrictive covenant be placed on tbe back 50'of ~ross' prop~rty to protect tbe trees, tbat a 3 mo~tb opt~on ()f $5 ,~OO be _1.!lP.~~CE! ~b1.cb__.._ would be subtracted from tbe price upon City purcbase. Mot1.on carr1.ed-5/0. n ~_.._.__. .. _____. _,~_,__,':"__":"~""'-:c"___' -,'", .-~.,-. _.~.._"- CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990 Page twenty . . PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, Brancel seconded, to approve the claims for payment and to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 12:40AM on Tuesday, April 24, 1990. GENERAL AND LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NO. 00-00166-02 General Liquor Checks I 4115 - 4254 $ 89,239.85 $ 63,692.51 Payroll Checklist: Checks I 203958 - 203993 TOTAL 12,692.38 101,932.23 2,853.51 66,546.02 Motion carried - 5/0. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Sue Niccum Assistant Clerk _._---_.-~--_.._,_.-~-.~--~._'-"'--. '-~ .~._._.~ _..' ,--.. .- --'-~--'--- _....~----..._.- ~.:<f.-' , I General Mills Business Mile. Log Driver's Name Vehicle Number Date . Beginning Odometer Reading ITITIIJ Business Purpose Business Miles Tlf INSTRUCTIONS . 1) The beginning odometer reading must be the same as the ending odometer reading on the previous log. It is necessary that the logs be continuous. . 2) For each business use complete the date. to/from. purpose and number of miles driven. 1) Submit the mileage log at least monthly. " Attach the white copy to an expense report and send through normal expense report control channels. \~he yellow copy is for your personal tax records. ( I":::> Total Ending Odometer Reading 7GM-2 --_._-------~-- --- -.---- -.--.- -.------.------------ ----_.-._~- General Mills Business Mileage Log o I-:v\ Beginning Odometer Reading ITITIIJ ~sines.s' Purpose Business Miles Driver's Name Vehicle Number Date INSTRUCTIONS 1) The beginning odOmeter readtng must be the same as the ending odometer reading on the previous log. It is _ry lhet the logs be continuous. 2) For each buSiness use complete the date. to/from. purpose and number of mileS driven. 3) Submit the mileage log at least monthly. 4) Attach the white copy to an expense report and send through normal expense report control channels. The yelloW copy is for your personal tax records. Total Ending Odometer Reading 5117 GM-2 1. 2. 2b. 2c. 3. 4a. 4b. . . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) QUESTIONS Shorewood Residents for Safe Neighborhoods Because the increased taxes of approximately $230,000 will not go into the general fund, the taXpay'ers must p'ay for the services that the retail, commercial ana multi-family developments will require. These are not incidental expenses. The CitVs 1990 proposed budget indicates .that over $720,000, or 35% of itS operating expenditures are spent on police" public works.l.streets, snow removal, traffic control, street lighting, sanitation and tree maintenance. Isn't it true that these services will be paid for by Shorewood taxpayers? Isn't it also true that the taxpayers must pay for the scnool needs for the multi-family hOUSing? Why can't the City assess the costs of the improvements baCK to the deveroper? Although State Statutes Charter 429 limits special assessments to tne increase in value 0 the propeny, certainly a good portion or even majority of costs I'!'a~ be assesseer to the project. Isn't this a common prac- bce. . If the developer says the project is overpriced and can't increase in any more value, aoes Chapfer 429 have any spe- cial provisions to make an exception and assess anyway' If the project is overpriced and there are no special ~rovi- sions unaer which a sp.ecial assessment can be maae, doesn't this indicate tHis is a shakY develop.ment looking for a subsidy in order for it to be viabre? Why is the City lining ~~ocke~ of Trivesco, the seller of this overpricecf prop- Why doesn't the City figure out a way to have the developer pay for the.im~rovements? The developer, if he is really ~mmitted to this project, should be wiDing to make the Improvements. Isn't it true that at the City Council work session on 1/29/90 that larrY Whittaker acknowledged there would be some risk to the City is "traditional" TIF was used? Didn't the Council at one point plan on using a somewhat safer form of TIF called "Pay-as-you-go" Plan? If so, isn't it also now true that the City wantS to use the riskier "traditional" TIF because there are not enough incremental 4c. 4d. 5. . . 6. taxes to pay for the HPay-as-you-go plan" (which must use taxable interest rates vs. tax-free rates)? Was this switch ever a conscious decision of the Council? Did the Council discuss it, Qr was it made without discussion? Is this a desperate case of assumina too much risk just to hurrY up and make a guick decision'"? Who is rushing this project along anyway' The Hpay-as-you-go" plan requires that a taxable vs. a tax- free interest rate Ile used pursuant to IRS rules. This could increase the interest rate from 6% to 9%. At 6%, the projected surplus is $31 ,000 or 1 %. At 9%, the project would have approximately a $250,000 deficit. Because "traditional" TIF is too risky, the City should consider usin~ the HPay-as- you-go" methoCl. Because the .Pay-as-you:-Qo method is too expensive, the City should not consider using TIF at all. If TIF is such a good financing tool, why is the Minnesota legislature consldering.a bill that would limit abuses such as how Shorewood contemplates using TIF? (i.e., the use of TI F in an affluent area vs. an area ttiat is substandard or blighted) . Has the City really and thoroughly p'ursued other financing options, such as requiring the aeveloper to pay for the improvements? It is not uncommon for a developer to - imp.rove or construct roads which will benefit their p'roject ana then donate the property back to the City to maintain. Does it really' surp.rise the City that the developer says he needs the CItY. to finance the Intersection? If you were a developer ana thought you could get a municlpali!y to pay for something woulan't you give if a try1 Wouldn't you say you couldn't afford it just like Sherman-Boosalis is saying? TIF is a verv complex and potentially riskY financing tool. What have the City Council and City Staff done to eaucate themselves from an objective source on the subject matter? Is the City making an uninformed decision? How does S~ringsted get paid for their front-end consulting project and their assisfance with the actual financing if TIF were approved? Does this arrangement include any contin- gency or success fees? If so, doesn't this reflect on the bias or financial incentive that Springsted has seeing the City approve apd use 11F? Why not rely on the Council's finance subcommittee for Input? 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. . . Why is the Waterford Phase In development different from other strip malls in this area? Isn't it true that other proper- ties along Highwa'Y. 7 and 19 have had difficulties with main- taining a. reasonalile occupancy rate? If in fact the Waterford Phase III development doesn't prosper, does the City have personal guarantees or letters of credit to J::s~t; that there is limited risK to the Ci~ If not, why? Has e I firmly requested such protection from ffie developer? f not, why? Included in the SprinQstedstudy on TIF, the Council stated that they have determined that the proposed developments would not occur through p-rivate investment in the foresee- able future. How has the Council determined this and what were the steps involved? When Target and/or Rainbow Foods approached the City several years ago, did they ask the City for financing help'1 If not", doesn't tllis indicate that private investments coulct be available? Let the developer p'ay for the improvements and let's see if he is just another oeveloper trying to take advantage of a City and its taxpayers. . For further information} call Jay Hare, Shorewoo.d Residents for Safe Neighborhoods at 470-9T16 (H). . .Il/ \'IVV \P.~t~~~1Y V . \ q bd.? . Why can't the developer pay for the improvements, thus freeing up additional tax dollars for needed community projects like improving our unacceptable water system? Is the City willing to take the responsibility of using Tax Increment Financing when they have prior knowledge that the primary neighborhoods the development depends on will refuse to support the Dusinesses there? . . 5570 Old Market Road Shorewood,.MN 55331 April 23, 1990 Shorewood City Council City Hall Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council Members: I have prepared these questions and comments in written form so that you will be certain to remember them after the presentations at today's hearing. Please keep them in mind as you consider establIshing a Tax Increment Financing project area. 1. Inwhat way will the city claim ownership in the proposed intersection? I believe the state will own it and already has plans to tear out this OMR intersection when Hwy 7 is upgraded. I believe they can and will do that, regardless of city council desires, just as MNDOT is now planning to upgrade the intersections at Vine Hill and Christmas Lake. 2. How will the cost of snow plowing be recovered for the new streets in. Waterford Phase ill? If you siphon off the taxes from this development to pay for the intersection, other city services will be paid from the general fund. The other taxpayers of Shorewood will have to keep that fund going. Tax Increment Financing is actually contra to your "policy" that the area benefitted should bear the costs. 3. Why are you considering the inclusion of the multi-family housing of Waterford Phase ill in the TIF district? The people Jiving in that housing will not be benefitted by the intersection. It is required only for the viability of the commercial portion of the development. The new residents of Waterford Phase ill will suffer from the traffic as well as any other residents near Old Market Road. 4. What happens if nobody builds the multi-family homes? These lots have been compared to the Habitat in Edina (Hwy 169 and Crosstown). However, the Habitat is not near an intersection. Those residents have to drive to Londonderry or Gleason. I think these Waterford Phase ITI lots will not sell fast. So, in the meanwhile, who pays for the intersection? . . 5. What happens if the legislature outlaws this kind of use of TIF? The original purpose of TIF was to allow a mechanism for financing renewal of blighted areas of the city. Suburbs have abused TIF by usin~ it to create public works that are needed or are not economically viable Without support from public funds. This will create a surplus of such facilities as strip malls, and soon they will become boarded up, blighted areas. Hardly the purpose intended. There is empty office space in the building next to the Skipperette and empty retail space on Dell Road. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ~S'hter --"---'~"-". I . . TIF PUBLIC HEARING 1. Why is the Council considering TIF rather than general obligation bonds? Is it because general obligation bonds require a referendum and tax payer's approval and TIF does not? 2. Could TIF reduce the credit rating of the City? 3. Why has the City decided to have a public hearing now before the Council and residents have had time to understand TIF and consider Springsted's report? 4. If TIF district fails and the City needs to enlarge the TIF district to pay for the intersection or make available ~ther debt repayments, would you: a. increase taxes to cover the debt payments and maintain the same level of City services, or b. keep taxes the same and cut programs and services? c. If the City would cut programs & services, which would be cut or reduced? 5. How often have the Consultant seen TIF used to develop a prime piece of real estate? 6. What guaranteed leases does ShermanlBoosalis have to offer the City to ensure the success of this business venture? How many are signed? 7. How many new Shorewood businesses andjobs does Sherman/Boosalis' development bring to Shorewood? Please name them. 8. The Consultant's report states: ''Proposed development in the opinion of the City could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future." a. Is this the opinion of the consultant? b. What would lead the Consultant to this conclusion? Please specify your evidence and research. . . c. What would lead the City to this conclusion? Please specify your evidence and research. 9. The Fire Chief stated to several Shorewood residents on April 19, 1990, that he did not see the intersection at Highway 7 and Old Market Road necessary for fire protection of the area. He went on to say that it was only necessary to have 2 entrances to any area and there are already 2 existing entrances. Where did the City get its information presented by City Staff at the last Old Market Road Public Hearing where they stated that police and fire services felt the intersection was necessary for citizens in the S.E. Shorewood area? 10. Would a less expensive alternative at Old Market RoadlHighway 7 be more appropriate in view of anticipated reduced revenue from the State? 11. Since the Old Market Road intersection has been requested by Christmas Lake and Shady Hills residents, does the City have the option to tax those residents for this improvement since they are the ones requesting it and the residents benefiting from it? 12. What is the Council's Financial Advisory Committee's position on TIF? 13. Why shouldn't the City use General Obligation Bonds with developer assurances and submit it to the residents for a referendum? 14. If this TIF benefits the entire City, can't it be subject to a referendum even though State law does not require a referendum? . . April 26, 1990 APR 3 0 1990 :p Mayor Jan Haugen City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Mayor Haugen: On Monday, April 23, 1990, I attended the City council meeting and public hearing regarding the Highway 7 and Old Market Road intersection. While I have never been in favor of the intersection, I am even more opposed to tax increment financing to finance the construction of it. By the time you receive this letter, you will see that the state Legislature is making great strides and is close to passing a bill limiting tax increment financing for very good reason. I also wa~ very disturbed at the meeting to hear Mr. Whittaker, our city Administrator, make the comment that "all financings carry risk". I have made a career of providing financing for corporations from near bankrupt companies to the Fortune 500. Anytime a lender can eliminate its financing risk that advantage should be used. In the case of tax increment financing for the intersection, the city should require from the developer a 100% letter of credit provided by a financially strong major money center bank. In addition to the above, I was disturbed by the remarks made by councilman Gagne regarding the water problem in southeast Shorewood. It is a problem for the residents he believes, not the city. It seems to me that it is a problem that needs attention and resolution by the City since it is a new well and tower. There should be recourse back to the contractor and/or drilling company since the well is not providing quality water. After all, we did pay for the right to have quality water. Sincerely, e:;:~ 19720 Sweetwater Curve Shorewood, MN 55331 cc: Larry Whittaker // ". ^._--,_.,"'~._.....,-......~ -, --~_..-...,-..",......;-,,-~........:!,...',.,........,~ . . April 26, 1990 council Member Brancel City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council Member Brancel: On Monday, April 23, 1990, I attended the City council meeting and public hearing regarding the Highway 7 and Old Market Road intersection. While I have never been in favor of the intersection, I am even more opposed to tax increment financing to finance the construction of it. By the time you receive this letter, you will see that the state Legislature is making great strides and is close to passing a bill limiting tax increment financing for very good reason. I also was very disturbed at the meeting to hear Mr. Whittaker,. our City Administrator, make the comment that "all financings carry risk". I have made a career of providing financing for corporations from near bankrupt companies to the Fortune 500. Anytime a lender can . eliminate its financing risk that advantage should be used. In the case of tax increment financing for the intersection, the city should require from the developer a 100% letter of credit provided by a financially strong major money center bank. In addition to the above, I was disturbed by the remarks made by councilman Gagne regarding the water problem in southeast Shorewood. It is a problem for the residents he believes, not the city. It seems to me that it is a problem that needs attention and resolution by the City since it is a new well and tower. There should be recourse back to the contractor and/or drilling company since the well is not providing quality water. After all, we did pay for the right to have quality water. sincerely, ~//U ames A .Finstuen 19720 Sweetwater Curve Shorewood, MN 55331 cc: Larry Whittaker..........'. . . April 26, 1990 .. council Member stover city of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council Member stover: On Monday, April 23, 1990, I attended the city council meeting and public hearing regarding the Highway 7 and Old Market Road intersection. While I have never been in favor of the intersection, I am even more opposed to tax increment financing to finance the construction of it. By the time you receive this letter, you will see that the state Legislature is making great strides and is close to passing a bill limiting tax increment financing for very good reason. I also was very disturbed at the meeting to hear Mr. Whittaker, our City Administrator, make the comment that "all finam:::ings carry risk". I have made a career of providing financing for corporations from near bankrupt companies to the Fortune 500. Anytime a lender can eliminate its financing risk that advantage should be-used. In the case of tax increment financing for the intersection, the city should require from the developer a 100% letter of credit provided by a financially strong major money center bank. In addition to the above, I was disturbed by the remarks made by councilman Gagne regarding the water problem in southeast Shorewood. It is a problem for the residents he believes, not the city. It seems to me that it is a problem that needs attention and resolution by the city since it is a new well and tower. There should be recourse back to the contractor and/or drilling company since the well is not providing quality water. After all, we did pay for the right to have quality water. Sincerely, ~/~ James A .Finstuen 19720 Sweetwater CUrve Shorewood, MN 55331 cc: Larry Whittaker / .... ..4.. - . . April 26, 1990 .. council Member Watten City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Council Member Watten: On Monday, April 23, 1990, I attended the City Council meeting and public hearing regarding the Highway 7 and Old Market Road intersection. While I have never been in favor of the intersection, I am even more opposed to tax increment financing to finance the cwnstruction of it. By the time you receive this letter, you will see that the state Legislature is making great strides and is close to passing a bill limiting tax increment financing for very good reason. I also was very disturbed at the meeting to hear Mr. Whittaker, our City Administrator, make the comment that "all financings carry risk". I have made a career of providing financing for corporations from near bankrupt companies to the Fortune 500. Anytime a lender can eliminate its financing risk that advantage should be. used. In the case of tax increment financing for the intersection, the city should require from the developer a 100% letter of credit provided by a financially strong major money center bank. In addition to the above, I was disturbed by the remarks made by councilman Gagne regarding the water problem in southeast Shorewood. It is a problem for the residents he believes, not the city. It seems to me that it is a problem that needs attention and resolution by the City since it is a new well ahd tower. There should be recourse back to the contractor and/or drilling company since the well is not providing quality water. After all, we did pay for the right to have quality water. Sincerely, ~~~ 19720 Sweetwater CUrve Shorewood, MN 55331 cc: Larry Whittaker..- . . COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M.-SPECIAL MEETING 7;30 P.M.-BOARD OF REVIEW CITY OF SHOREWOOD BOARD OF REVIEW MONDAY, APRIL 30, 1990 MINUTES CALL TO CRDER Mayor Haugan opened the Special Council Meeting of April 23, 1990, at 7:u6P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Haugen opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Haugen, Councilmembers Gagne, Brancel, Watten and Stover Staff: Deputy City Clerk Kennelly APPROVAL OF MINpTES - Board of Review - April 18, 1990 Brancel moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the minutes of the Board of Review meeting of Wednesday, April 18, 1990, as written. Motion carried - 5 ayes. REVIEW AGENDA Council asked when will the items that were not discussed on the April 23, 1990, Council Agenda would be reviewed. The items will be added when additional staff is present. Watten moved, seconded by Gagne, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion carried - 5 ayes. APPEAL NOTICE TO REMOVE - 4830 Ferncroft Drive Mrs. Darlene Dallman represented her children in their appeal for an extension of time on their notice to remove at 4830 Ferncroft Drive. Mrs. Dallman explained that her daughters family has moved a\vay and it's very difficult for them to complete the clean up and removal until their children are out of school. Many items that were not lost in the fire of their home are still stored on the property. Wattert stated that efforts to clean up the property has been made. Watten moved, seconded by Stover, to extend the notice to remove to June 15, 1990, to relocate the property in violation due to the fire. Motion carried - 5 ayes. -1- cf<(2 MINUTES - speCia1~etin9/Board of Review - ~i1 30, 1990 PAGE 2 MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Haugen recommended the purchase of set of books - Elected Officials Handbook for City Hall. Haugen also requested approval to send the Secretary/Receptionist to a conference on Handling the Media. Gagne moved, seconded by Stover, to authorize the purchase of the Elected Officials Handbook and the Conference on Handling the Media. Motion carried - 5 ayes. STAFF REPORTS Recycling Mayor Haugen would like to coordinate with other surrounding cities and put together an informational news release on re- cycling and yardwaste methods. Brancel will obtain information on recycling plastics. Designating General Fund Balance at December 31, 1989 for Working Capital Stover explained that the State and City Auditors recommended a general fund balance of 50% of the yearly budget. The fund balance improves the bond rating and saves on interest paid. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to accept the Finance Dir- ector's recommendation to designate the entire General Fund balance of $953,875.00 as of December 31, 1989, for working capital purposes. Motion carried - 5 ayes. ADJOURNMENT Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to adjourn the Special Council Meeting at 7:28 P:M., Monday, April 30, 1990, and to resume following the Board of Review. Motion carried - 5 ayes. BOARD OF REVIEW CONTINUATION CONVENE Mayor Haugen convened, at 7:30 P.M., on Monday, April 30, 1990, the continuation of the Board of Review held on Wednesday, April 18, 1990. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Haugen, Councilmembers Gagne, Stover, Brancel and Watten Staff: Deputy City Clerk Kennelly, City Assessors Rolf Erickson, Dave Wilde and Rita Guderian. -2- MINUTES - specia~eting/Board of Review - ~il 30, 1990 PAGE 3 APPLICANTS TO THE BOARD OF REVIEW The Board of Review will hear additional concerns from residents not at the first convening of the Board. The following listed pro- perty owners requested consideration to reduce their assessed values on their real estate properties. Mary McNabb 19420 Elbert Point 36-117-23-44-0048 Mrs. McNabb presented written information to the Board on comparable sales from Multiple Listing Sales, she also stated that she purchased her property in June of 1989 for $151,685. Assessor Erickson reduced the lot valuations in the Near Mountain area by approximately $7,000.00 from $42,000.00 to $35,000. Stover supports a reduction from $169,300.00 to McNabbs' purchase price of $151,685. Watten moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the valuation of Mary McNabb - 19420 Elbert Point to $153,000.00 - ($35,000.00 Land - $118,000 Building). Motion carried - 5 ayes. David McCuskey 5250 Howards Point Road 30-117-23-44-0007 Mr. McCuskey is opposed to his 31% increase in valuation over the past three years. He wanted to preserve his right to continuance with the Hennepin County Board. Gagne moved, seconded by Watten, to accept the assessor recommendation for no change in value of $357,700. Motion carried - 4 ayes-l nay Stovel John Bridge 25810 Birch Bluff Road 29-117-23-44-0007 Mr. Bridge submitted written informat~on on past valuations on his property. His valuation has increased 31% in the past three years. Bridge referred to his next door neighbors home as a comparable but assessed $66,000.00 less than his own. Stover supported Mr. Bridges' appraisal and comparables and questioned a $35,000.00 increase in his land value. Brancel moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce Mr. Bridges' value 2% from $235,800.00 to $231,000.00 (Land $165.700 - Building, $65,300.) Motion carried - 5 ayes. David Sanders 5205 Howards Point Road 30-117-23-44-0002 Mr. Sanders explained that he had a seasonal home on a nonconforming lot. His valuation has increased 28% in one year. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to use 80 feet of effective front frontage at $1,550. a foot and reduce his valuation from $246,900. to $208,000. (Land, $124,000.-Building, $84,000.) Motion carried-5 ayes. -3- . . MINUTES - Special Meeting/Board of Review - April 30, 1990 PAGE 4 Gary Larson 5980 Ridge Road 36-117-23-31-0011 Mr. Larson is opposed to a $56,000.00 increase in one year. Assessors did rewrite the house and reviewed the sales in the area. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce Mr. Larsons' valuation from $225,200.00 to $200,200. (Land, $136,000. - Building, $64,200.) Motion carried - 4 ayes - 1 nay (Watten) Simon Oosterman 19365 Waterford Place 36-117-23-11-0018 Mr. Oosterman bought his property in August of 1987 and his valuation has increased from $385,000.00 in 1988 to $456,900.00 in 1990. He referred to a property on Muirfield Circle as a comparable with an assessed value of $365,900.00 He stated that the equity should be the same. Brancel moved, seconded by Watten, to decrease the valuation by 3% from $456,900. ~o $443,000. (Land $62,000. - Building, $381,000.) Motion carried - 5 ayes. Dorothy Lane 5660 Christmas Lake Point 35-117-23-14-0004 Mrs. Lane received a 9.8% increase in the past year. She stated the property was valued too high in the past years. Her house is on a private road which has to be plowed and maintained at the homeowners expense. She felt her 24 year old home is very run down. She has calculated an average increase in valuation of 16~% for each of the 24 years she has owned the property. Erickson stated tpat 1982-1989 reflects a 4% increase each of those years. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to decrease Mrs. Lanes' valuation 3% from $200,900.00 to $194,700. (Land, $72,700. - Building, $122,000.) Motion carried - 5 ayes. James Bruce 1010 Holly Lane 35-117-23-44-0008 Mr. Bruce submitted comparables on recent sales in Christmas Lake, that he felt substantiates his request for a $200,000. land valuation. Mr. Bruce also stated that he had a fee appraisal done in 1989 that came in at $425,000. He requested a reduction from $543,700. to $456,000. The assessor has reviewed and recommended a reduction in valuation to $525,700. (Land, $270,000. - Building, $255,700.) Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to reduce the valuation to $456,000. ($256,000., Building - $200,000. Land) due to comparables submitted by Mr. Bruce. Motion failed-2ayes to 3 nayes (Watten, Stover, Haugen) -4- . . MINUTES - Specia~eting/Board of Review -~il 30, 1990 PAGE 5 -.- . James Bruce - Continued 1010 Holly Lane 35-117-23-44-0008 Brance1 moved, se90nded by Gagne, for a 10% reduction to $489,300. ($233,300.,Land - $256,000., Building). Motion carried - 3 ayes 2 nayes (Stover, Gagne) Karen Vance 5690 Ridge Road 36-117-23-24-0007 Mrs. Vance submitted comparab1es in the area, and stated that her valuation was too high and should remain at the 1989 value of $457,600. not the 1990 increase to $536,300. Brance1 moved, seconded by Gagne,to reduce the valuation by 4% from $536,3000.00 to $514,800. (Land $231,200.00 - Building, $283,600.) Motion carried - 3 ayes to 2 nayes (Stover, Haugen). Stover stated that this property compared to Mr. Bruces' and the valuation was still too high. ADDITIONAL VALUATION CHANGES Watten moved, seconded by Brance1, to approve a1~ other valuation changes as recommended after review by the City Assessors. Motion carried - 5 ayes. * Refer to Final List submitted by Assessosr (Attachment) ADJOURNMENT Gagne moved, seconded by Brance1, to adjourn the final Board of Review of Monday, April 30, 1990, at 9:49 P.M. Motion carried - 5 ayes. RECONVENE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING YARDWASTE COLLECTION Council was submitted a list of six alternative methods of yardwaste programs for consideration. Stover moved, seconded by Gagne, to institute alternative number 5 - Sticker Sales for curbside pick-up. Motion carried. ~ 5 ayes. ADJOURNMENT Watten moved, seconded by Stover, to adjourn thp. Regular Council meeting of Monday, April 30, 1990, at 9:50 P.M., a continuation of the Regular .Counci1 meeting of April 23, 1~.9Q~.' .J.'1.Q.t;J.Qn..~arried...-: '5 aye.s'~' ....-. ... '~J''''''''''.':':~'~' :-~--~...,,~. ....'... .-..........-.: ..... '.". .. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Jan Haugen, Mayor Sandra Kennelly Deputy City Clerk -5- ;' . . WATER <nlNECrlal AGREE\IENT TIns AGREE\IENI'. made this day of . by and between the CITI OF SH:RE\\CCD. a municipal corporat ion, (the "Ci ty") and of . Shorewood. Minnesota. (the 10Nner"). \\HEREAS, C>.vner is the owner of certain real property (the "o.vner Property") located in the City of Shore wood, County of Hennepin. State of ~linnesota. described in KXhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and \~. the City O\vns a municipal water system \Vhich does not presently serve the o.vner Property; and \~~. the C>.vner desires to interconnect with the Municipal' Water System and pay to the Ci ty of a connection charge therefor; and - - ~HEREAS. the City is willing to pennit C>.vner to connect to the ~funicipal Water System provided that o.vner agrees to the provisions contained herein. ;' ~v, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual contained covenants herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. ONner shall have the right to interconnect with the l\iunicipal Water System and pay to the City of. a connection charge therefor. 2. All work involved in such interconnection will be done according to City specifications and under City supervision and all expenses and costs connected therewith will be paid by C>.vner. C>.vner further agrees to convey all necessary easements and donate all watennains to City after completion of the project. 3. In the event that City extends the Shorewood municipal water system to serve the ONner Property at sane tilm in the future, o.vner agrees to pay any assessment in connection therewith on the same basis as all other properties assessed at that time, and C>.vner herewith specifically agrees to waive any claims or defenses to said assessment based upon a theory of no benefit because of the water connection allowed herein. 4. It is further agreed by and between the parties that this Agreement shall run wi th the land and shall benefit and be binding upon their respective legal representatives. successors and assigns. 311 . . MAY - it 1990 23115 Summit Ave. Excelsior, MN 55331 Ma y 4, 1 990 Shorewood City Council 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Brad Nielsen - Dear Mr. Nielsen and Council members: I am a Shorewood resident seeking to connect to the Chanhassen water supply. Chanhassen's water line runs to the corner of my yard, while I understand that Shorewood has no plans to put water in my immediate area. David Hempel, with the City of Chanhassen, has indicated I can hook up if the appropriate fees are paid. He also asked that a letter be sent from the City of Shorewood giving approval for my hookup. Would you please send a letter to Chanhassen, David Hempel's attention, that would allow this connection? Thank you. Sincerely, 12 ~ Lar~dt cc. David Hempel 3~ ... . QSM. err Schelen . Mayer?n& Associates, Inc. . ,4PR 2 0 1990 April 19, 1990 City of Shorewood . 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Surveyors Planners Attn: Mr. Larry Whittaker City Administrator Re: S.E. Area Elevated Water Storage Tank Project No. 86-1D OSM Comm. No. 3707.40 Dear Mr. Whittaker: Over the past couple months, I've had discussions with CBI Na-Con, the Contractor on the S.E. Area Elevated Water Storage Tank. We've discussed finalling out this project by withholding money from the final payment to cover the cost of restoring the site as a result of erosion damage from tank overflows. Currently, we have a price from Fury Contracting Co., 6197 Eagle Lake Drive, Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 to restore the site for $2,500. From previous emergency temporary site work the City has incurred costs of $1,140.32 on its public works crew and equipment and $192.50 for Cat work by Mr. Don Kerber. The total cost of these items is $3,832.82. At this time, I recommend the City withhold $3,832.82 from the final payment to CBI to cover the cost to restore the site at the el d tower. The current amount of retainage is $8,461. Final payment wotiI e 4,628.18. If you have any questions, please let me know. Respectfully, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. eJ-#7 ..p 1~ James P. Norton, P.E. Project Manager JPN/crow 04 /90-cos.1w cc: Mr. Don Zdrazil, City of Shorewood - Mr. Bill Cherniwchan, CBI Na-Con Mr. Phil Tipka, Resident Inspector 3<6 . . - 'fF j)Yr . a national construction services organization April 20, 1990 CBI Na-Con, Inc. 24137111th Street Naperville. Illinois 60564 APR 2 7 \990 708 904 2000 FAX: 708 904 2014 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Larry Whittaker city Administrator Re: S.E. Area Elevated Water storage Tank .. project No. 86-1D OSM Comm. No. 3707.40 CBl Na-Con Contract C70711 Dear Mr. Whittaker: This letter is to advise you that CBl Na-Con is in basic agreement with the recommendation proposed by Mr James P. Norton of OSM, lnc in his letter to you dated April 19, 1990 for finalling out the project. CBl's agreement is contingent upon CBl's contractual obligations ceasing entirely in the erosion matter with the city's . acceptance of Mr. Norton's recommendation that the erosion damage be settled at the total cost of $3,832.82 to CBl and that the City will complete the work. Thus, the project would be finC3,_.../ ith the payment upon receipt of CBl' s final invoic~/()~4, 628.18 hich is attached to Mr. Norton's copy of this l~. issue a change order complete the docu~entation of this settlement. Sincerely, /....u ( n ( W.N. Cherniwchan Constr~ction Engineer 3B . ~ . Q'~U =" . J.iI WL Assodates,lnC. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 rAX331-3806 Engince."S Surveyors Planners May 0, 1990 Cil . of Shcrtwood 575S!Country Club Road ShOt[~OOd' Minnesot. 55J31 R, : ,SOqthea.st Area Elellilted lJater Storagt Tallk lpedtstal Suppo~ttd Sph~riDd and Appurt~nant Work Project No. ao~1D IO~ Can. No. 3707,40 . I Ci ty rCounci I : . EnclJsid are lour (4) copi~s 01 Construction PaYBent Voucn~r No. 11 & final on the referenced proJ~ct in (he ~OUllt 01 I 1 i 4628. 2C.. I , Purs~Rt to our field obserll.tioll, as p~rformed in accordahce with our contract, we ntreoy certiiy that the ~dterilais art ~atisid(tory and th~ worK prop~rly pertorBed in accordance ~ith the plans and specifications. upon r~(~lpt Ot affIdavit, St4te 01 Minnesota Fora 1C-134, and also Rectipt and Waiver ot Lien Rights tr~ C81 r>{a~Con, In!:. I pieasC' l1a.k~ p<<lment to C81 Na.-Con, 1Ilc., 24137 - llltn Street, Plainfield, Minnuoti60544 at 10~t url iest cOllvenienc~. I I V~ry trUlY ~Qursl oaR-stHElEN-HAYERU~ J+:S'fC'7J~ JilaU Ip. Nor ton 1i'.E. Proje t E>>gloeer cc; 1 Hi-Con, lAC. 38 ,~,~ .. A . . CBI Na.Con, 'nc. FINAL WAIVER OF LIEN (Revised - original Issued 10-19-88) ContractC 70711 The undersigned, for and in consideration of Four Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninet Seven& 1 V~Dollars ($ 465,397.18), hereby waives and releases any and all lien, or claim or right of lien, under the statutes of the-State of Minnesota relating to mechanics' liens on the work and premises described as follows: The work described as: {l) 400 MG X"115' BeL Waterspheroid The premises commonly known as Wter Tower Site-Southeast .Area City of Shorewood , County of Hennepin and on any and all work situated on said premises on account of any and all labor, materials, supplies and equipment furnished by the undersigned for or in connection with the work described above. Signed and sealed this 23rd day of ~J2:0~c. April , 1990. Subscribed and sworn to before me OffJCJAL SEAl Caroline L Nalt-Qualb. Notary Public, state at ' County of Wilt I My Commission Expires 9.23-92 , 192Q. (SEAL) ) I., . . ES~lIaah Voucher No. 11 & Final I -~--------- Oate Hay 10, 1990 ! protec t NUAber C1a~s of Work C~STRUCT1~ PAYMENT VOUCHER. ------------------------ For Period fnding April 30, 1990 86-1D ----~------------------------------------------------------------------------------~---------._------- Elevated Water .Storage TanK Pedestial SuppOtted Spheriod ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lec.tion and Appurtenant Work To : CBl Na-Con, IRC. -------~------------~---------~----------------------- 24137 - tIlth Street Southnst Area Plainfield, 1lt inois 60544 ---------~-----------~----------------------------~-- (815) 436-9800 City of Sbor~od, Hennepin County, Minnesota For -------------------------------~-------------------~- A. Original Contract Anount '$ 4631011.00 ~----------------------- 8. Total Additions '$ 7730.00 C.O. .2 & 3 ------------------------ C. Total Deduttions "$ 5432.82 C.O. it & 4 ------------------------ D. Total Funds Encumbered , 465397.18 E. Total Value oi YorK Certified to Date 1 465397.18 ------------------------ F. Less Retained Percentage I. '$ 0.00 ______w_________________ j ! j I ! J, Balance Carried Forward i , APPRq..'ALS ORR-~ELEN~YERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. -----~-------------------------------- I Pursu~t to our field observation, as pe~tormed in accordance with our contract, ~e hereby certify that the materials are ~tisfactDry and the work properly pertor~ed in actordance with tbe plans and specifications and that the total work js 100 I. completed as of April 30, 1990 . We hereby rec~end payment of this voucher. Sign,! : ------------ --------'--------------------Signed : JL~ R t1 I ~..t'uc;i;;;,:.:;;;:---.-.- 0-------=-/)4 -----t------~-------------------------------~-------------------------~-----------------~---------------~----------- ibis J5 to certiiy tbat to the best of IIY kIICMledge, information, and belief, the quantities ind values of work certi ied nerein is a fair approxiJute estimate Tor tbe period touered by this youcher. contr!ctor : C91 Na-CoR, Inc. Si gned By 1 -----------------------------_____ Date I: I ~~~ m:~~~~~ App,oved j., P.....t__________________________..____________________ ChL'ClcT 81 : ________________________________ Date Authorized Representative Oatt .: _____________.___.______________________~__.____ Page 11 rn 3 ------------------~;O-;:4-0---- I G. Less lotal Pre~ious Payments , 400763.92 -~---------------------- H. Approved 10r Payment, Thi~ Report s 4628.26 I. Total Pa~ents Including Tbis Voucher $ 465397. t a " G.nn --.--------------------- ------------~~----------------------~---------- Title ------------------------------------ ---._---~.._-------------~------------------.- ---------------------.-------------------------------------- r }E;stiJu.te Voucher No. 13 & final ua~e . ~ -;:~;:-;-;;;--. I ---------------------------------- I SOftheast Area Elevated Water Storage TanK P~de5tial Supported Spheriod and Appurtenant Work Pr,ject No. 86-10 fot the cii~ Ot ShorewoodJ Hennepin County, Minnesota I Coqtract Date : Work Calplehd I Apri I 3, 1996 J No1 ---r-----------------.----------------------~.------~--------------------------__-_____________________________________________ sChl. du I e 4A" 1) - Exca~ation and Embankment Borrow Material 210~.2 Granular BQrr~ Bedding 210j.2 General Imported Fill 210).2 Topsoil BorrO'A I 2) t- 2211 2 1 I .tractor: eBI Na-Co4, loc. 24137-111th Street Plainf ield I Illinois (815) 43&-9800 Work Star ted Calpletion Date: 60544 Hell Work CmpJetea Ccntra,t This Fnount Total to Ilate Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Nonth This Hontb Quantity Total Pric& &00 C.Y. 2200 C.Y. 300 C.Y. Total for Item No.1 Aggl'ega te Base Class Sf 10~J. Crushed 12.00 8.00 11.00 160 C.Y. 1..a.....~fl..'~..A.....'.a'.'....4..~..$ 10.00 latal lor Item No.2 :...................'.a..,f..................$ 3) 2331 2341 2357' I il T ota) Tor 1 tell No.3 '" . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . . .. . .. , . . . . . . . a a " . . .'$ 4) - Concret~ Curbing 2531'r B618 Concrete Curb & or Valley Gutter 450 L.F. 2.50 Tota.l Tor Item No.4 ,.................,C........a..............$ 5) r 2575. ~. 2575T I ') I ;011 .l 261l'l 7> J 2611.~ 261t . ~ 20U.~ 2611. I 811) T I I 1 I Pagt 21M 3 I Bituminous Paqing 8ituminous Pavement <Base) BitWlinoU5 Surface Bituminous Tack Coat 34 Tons 17 Tons 10 Gal. Turf EstabishBtRt Seeded Area Sodding Ar-ea 2700S.Y. 400 S.Y. 25.00 150.00 25.00 .40 3.00 Tota.1 for Item No.5................. ........_......... .,......,..$ Water Hains 10' DIP Class 50 12' DIP Class 50 110 LF. 80 L.F. 40.00 25.00 Total ior 1 tfJ) No..6. 1.1 ." .. It...... ,,,. .. . ,..a .. ,. .. It.. ... . . .f.. .$ Wattr Hain Vallles & Fittings (Buried) 16' Butterfly Vil.ll1t 12" Gat~ Valve Hydrant CIU Valli. & Lead All Otbfr Fittings 1 2 1 2000 2500.00 120tl.OO 1500.00 1.75 Total for Ite~ No,] ...........~...."..........4......f.....$ 500,000 Sal. Single Pedestial Spheroid CAW Foundation, El~etrial and All Other Appurtenant Work Rot Itemized Above l.UIllp SUII 1 7200.60 17600.00 3300.00 28100.00 1600.00 1660.00 856.00 2550.00 250.00 3650.00 1125.00 1125.00 1080.00 1200.00 2280.00 4400.00 2000.00 .._-----...--- 6400.00 2500 .00 2400.60 150/).00 3500.00 ----...----....... 9900.00 472245.00 472245.00 lotal for Iten No.SA .......................................$ 472245.00 3707.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------- $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.1l0 ------...------ '$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 34 850.00 0.00 17 2553.00 0.00 16 250.60 ----------- --.----- '$ 0.00 $ 3650.00 0.00 0.00 .----------- -------- $ 0.00 '$ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------......-... --------.---- $ 0.90 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G.flO -------- .....-------- 'i 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 -..._--------- ----------- $ 0.00 i 0.00 0.00 usa .110 ------- ---- i 0.00 f 3~.OO I I, . . E.ti..l. Voucb., No. _____~ Ila~e : Nay 10, 1990 I -----------__________ I Soytheast ~ei Ele~ited Water Storage lank Pe~estial Supported Spheriod ind Appurtenant Work Pr?ject No. 8&-10 fOr the CilY 01 Shore~ood, Hennepin County, Minnesota I Work Completed aj: Contract This ~unt Total to Date No. 1tm Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Nonth This Month QUilltity Total Price I -~--_______w-_______------_-----------------------------.-------------------~-----.-_________________________~______________.___ 88)1 - 400,000 Gal. Singh Pedrstial Sphel'oid CIW Foun~tiOR, Electrial and All Other Appurtenant Work not lt~i~ed Above Lump Su~ 1 L.S. 410045.00 Foundat i on Electrical Material Tank Construction Paint . 123881.00 10159.00 176591.00 120382.00 32087.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 123881.00 1 10159.00 1 176591.00 1 120382.00 1 32087.06 Total ior SchedUle IA. (Items 1 tnl'u 7 Inclusive Ite~ as) .......$ 463100.00 ---------- $ 0.00 '$ 463100.00 Change Order No. 1 Chang. Order No. 2 ChaRge Order No.3 Over run Item No.3 C~angf Order No. 4 DEDUCT < J 600 .00 > 4730.00 3000.00 OEDUCl < - 3832.82) < 1600.00) 4730.00 < -3832.82 ) 3000.00 - 3832.82) latal ...,......... r :I AI . . . . .. '" I .. . . , . . . . . f' . .... 465397.18 1 -3832.82 $ 465397.18 I ! I Page 1 of 3 1 i 3707.40 Cbl.~ Ord" Ho.___________~__~ Da1e : Hay 10, 1996 I ----------------------------------- Soqtheast Area Elevated Water storage Taok Pedestial Supported Spheriod ind Appurtenant Worl Prqjfct No. S6-10 fot the Ci1'Y oi Shorewoodj Hennepin C<)unb, HiDnesota wor~ Cmphted lt~ Contract This mount Total to Oate No~ It~ Quantity Unit Unit Price iotal Price Month This HOAth Quantity Total Pric. J .... .' ;;~~~I::O~~~r~~I~~~~-~------------~-={ I , i I I .ractor : CSl Na.Con) Inc. 24137-111th Street Plainfield, Illinois (815) 436-9000 00544 Page 1 ol 1 3707.40 -.':~._-o_~_,__:~-:,...""~--_.'-:_- -~.. . I . ..." ~~ . i~' Order No. __---.:.__~ Oa(te : HilY 10 I 1990 I ----------------------------------- Soptheast Area Eleqated ~ater Storage Tank P~stial SUpported Spheriod and Appurtenant York Prrject No. 86-1D . .for the City oi Shor~oQd, Hennepin County, Minnesota I I Work CaJpleted lUll Contract This AIloullt Total to Oate Nol Hm Quantity Unit Unit Pl'ice Total Pritt Month Tbis Month Quantity Tofa.l ?tit: ;;[--:-- ~::::i:i:~b:_;~~~;~li::~~~:;;:~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------. paint, labor, freigbt and appurtenant I work included in the lump SUI price. 1 L.S. 4730.00 4730.0[ I I eractor : CBI Na-Con, Inc. 24137-111tb Stre~t Plainfield, Illinois (815) 430-9800 08544 I I i I I j ! I I I I I [ i c I I I I I j I i I I I Page\1 of 1 I I I I I ! 3707.40 ""-.",-"-",-"--<",_"~-:"",,,~,,,,,,,""-'_',-,'- . , > . Chl'Age Order No. ______~_________ Oa e : Hay 10, 1990 ------------- So.tbeast Area Elevated Water Storage Tank Pe~~stial Supported Spheriod and Appu~ienant Work Pr,ject No. 86-10 101 tht Ci IY 01 Shorewood, Hennepin Count)', Minnesota !t~ No; Itm Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Pl'ice Honth This Montb Quantity Tob! Ptice J----::::::: ~~.i (~~-----:::~--~~-25 ---- 625.: 2311 Bituminous Surhce 150.00 15 2250.Q() 23j BitUllinous Tack COit 25.M 5 _:25.00 I Total $ 3000.00 I I I l I I l I ! l I I I I I . Contrilctol' eBI Na-Coos Inc. 24137-111th street Plainiield, Illinois 60544 (815) 436-9800 Contract Work Ccnpleted lhi s FftOlJot Total to Date I I I I I i pagel 1 0; 1 3707.40 dange Ol'der No. I I 1)1te : --------~~~_:~~~~---- S~uthea5t Area Elevated Water Storagt Tank p,destial Supported Spheriod and Appurtenant Work P~oject No. 86-1D f~r the Ci\ty 0; Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota I , ~+II Itm ~---------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------- I . . 4 Contractor CBI Na-Con, Inc. 24137-111th Street ?lainiield, Illinois (815) 430-9900 60544 -------------------- Contract Quantity Unit Unit Ptice Total Price WorK COOlpleted This Mount Total to. Date Month Tbis Montb Quantity lotal PriCi 1) The cost to restore the site at the elevated tOReI', ~orkdone by others . Deduct iral Cal Ha-Con, Inc. . < - 3832.82) { -3832.8: Page 1 Ot 1 3707.4Q OKK-5CHfLt:N-MAYfRON & A550CIATt:S, INC. 2021 e. HENNEPIN AVE. · SUITE 238 MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 55413 CHANGE ORDER NO. ..~............. $. ",:,;3"~~?r~'~ - . . . . . . . .~~. ~~9~~".. ~~~................. ............ Contractor U: .J?+p,j,,,. ie~-:lO. . . 24137 - I11th Street If"..... ... If".."""...............""...."" If. If.."..""" "............." ?~.~~~;;~~~." .J;:I::I:;l)9~~... .99?~..... . ....... .. . . Dear Sir (s) Under your corttract. dated September 17 .........."..........."" If..... If"." If. If"" If If If If".................... ...." 87 19. . .. wi'th .~};l$il. .G~ ~Y. .qt. ~.l1qr;~~pqc;1, . M~I}I)~;s.q1;.~. . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owner for .s.Q\.l~.h.~~j;. .q.+~~ .~J.j:~C;)t~. ."iq.~~.r. .~1:P.r.:~9~. :t.~. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . we are autbortud by the OWner to hereby direct you to .q~il~t;. :t"F~ . ~~n.1;.1;"?~t;. ~P.~ . ~HI}.t .1;.~. .c,qV~r:. .t;t:u;. ~q:;;~. .C!~. ~~~t;9~~A9 . tP!3. .fii~j;~. p.~ . t:tl~ .~J.~.v.qt~. .t;~... . . . . . . . . :. .. . . . . . . ' , .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. " .. " .. .. If " " " .. " If " If " .. .. " ... .. .. .. " .. " " .If .. .. If If .. " " " " " .. .. " ... .. " " " If " .. " .. " .. .. " .. " " If " " . .. " If " .. .. If " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. " " .. " . .. " " ,.# . , .. . . .. .. . .... . . ... .. .. . '" .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. ..... .. . . .. f f .. . . f . .. . . .. . . . I . .. . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . .. ... . .. .. .. . .. . . . ... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. & ..... . . .. .. .. .. . ... .. . .... .. .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . " . '. . . & . .. . .. . .. . ... .. .. & .. .. .. .. .. ...,. . . .. . ,. . .. . . I .. . .. ... . .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. ..... .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . ,. . .. . . .& . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .... .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. aad CO ~ (deduct from) the contract, ID accordaltce wIth contract and apedtfcatloil, dM lIWD 01 Al1l;'~~. .~~/. .~4.gP.t; .1)~~. ~.l1~m-:;~q.?nq . ~~I.:l;QQ. :-: .-: .-: . :-. :: .:-. -Rfe' Dollars Ther$ will be an exteua1oa. .ot ..... ~ . . . .. days tor cOPlpleCloo. The dale of e(JmpledoQ ot COIlttac:C wv ....... 19.... and now wID be .......... 1& ...... AmOUl1tol oriGinal c:ontrKt Tot.l Addition" Tot.1 D.dudlonl ClJnttad to OJl'. $463,100..00 $4,730.00 C.O.t2 $1,600.00 C.O.i1 . 3,000'..00 C.O..43 3,832..82 C'..O..t4 $465/397.18 Approved .......................... 19. . . . JtO$J*ttuUy Sub#dcted. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . I ..... . . I .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . City of Shorewood Ow""r ORR-SC:HELEN-MAYRON & ASSOCIATES, INC. . .1i~..f).14....~1.~/~' ~B P. Norton, P.E.. . Approved .......................... 18.... .. ........... .f............ ...... ..... ...... Per ~ - -~~COn/. Inc. Cont r .ctor . . welt bennepln buman lelvlcel west hennepin human services planning board 4100 vernon avenue south, st. louis park, minnesota 55416 92G-5533 I May 1, 1990 MAY - 1 1990 Sandy Kennelly City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Sandy: Enclosed are three copies of the contract between Northern States Power, Shorewood, and West Hennepin Human Services. Please review and if there are no problems, have the appropriate city official sign the contract. This is a standard contract we have used in the' past. Once the contract is signed please forward the three copies to Scott Getty, Electric Marketing Department, Northern States Power, 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401. If you should have any questions regarding this matter please give me a call. Sincerely, Bruce Larson Assistant Director encl. '3C- commu& Energy Council Program A.ement This AGREEMENT, effective as of the I jJ- day of mo.. . ~ is between Northern States Power Company (NSP), a Minnesota Corporation, the City of SkO"e.\.U",... J (the "City") a Municipal Corporation, and West Hennepin Human Services (WHHS), an agency of local government. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission ("MPUC") ordered NSP to implement a conservation improvement program which included providing assistance to conduct the Home Energy Check-Up (HEC) for NSP residential customers, and WHEREAS, the City has established a Community Energy Council (CEC) whose responsibilities included conducting the Home Energy Check-up (HEC) for NSP residential customers. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions stated herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Publicity: The WHHS shall develop a program to stimulate interest and publicize the availability of the HEC in order to sign up households for the service. Promotions will be done with advertising, mailings and other direct communications. Upon request by the City or the WHHS, NSP will assist with publicity by providing mailing labels and offering advertising assistance at the option of NSP. 2. Selection of Participants:. Any NSP residential customer qualifies for the HEC. The WHHS is responsible for encouraging senior citizens, handicapped persons, low income individuals and renters to receive a HEC. 3. Customer Release Form: The WHHS will obtain signed authorization from each participant in the HEC allowing NSP to release consumption data to the auditor. This release form, a sample of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "Attachment A", shall be signed by each such participant prior to the release of the consumption data. 4. Audits: NSP shall reimburse the WHHS $95 for each approved HEC completed through July 1, 1990 by a WHHS auditor. NSP shall reimburse the WHHS $90 for each approved HEC completed from July 1 through December 31, 1990 by a WHHS auditor. 5. Auditor Training: NSP shall pay the tuition for the local training for up to two auditors, not to exceed a total of $700, who will perform audits for a City sponsored CEC. 3C 6. Energy conse.ion Materials: As part of the reiArsement for each HEC, NSP shall require the WHHS to provide between $20-$25 worth of energy conservation materials for each home receiving the HEC, with $5 of energy conservation materials specifically directed to electric conservation. A WHHS AUDITOR WILL IDENTIFY AND DEMONSTRATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE MATERIALS TO THE PARTICIPANTS, ANSWER QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO SENIOR CITIZENS, HANDICAPPED PERSONS, LOW INCOME INDIVIDUALS AND RENTERS. 7 7. Literature: NSP will provide information publications for the WHHS to offer to program participants. 8. Referral and Assistance: The WHHS auditors will inform participants of applicable energy assistance programs offered by the Energy Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Service, Minnesota Department of Economic Security, the City and other local agencies. 9. Equipment: NSP will assist the WHHS in obtaining the necessary equipment required to perform the BEC's. 10. Reporting Requirements: Each month, the WHHS shall submit an invoice to the NSP Regional Office Representative, in accordance with Section 15 of this Agreement, along with a list of participant names, addresses, account numbers and the number of renter and low income participants (hereafter called the Audit Summary) and a copy of the Audit signed by the customer. The NSP Regional Office will enter the data and forward the invoice to the NSP General ,Office for reimbursement to the WHHS. The audits, invoice and Audit Summary should be numbered consecutively from program start to finish for each calendar year. The WHHS is responsible for recording the number of renters and low income individuals, a sample of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "Attachment B", on each invoice. In addition, the WHHs shall adhere to these and other NSP recordkeeping procedures as agreed when the program is initiated. The WHHS shall grant NsP reasonable access to any books and records concerning the CEC and any of the funds and activities specified herein. The WHHs shall cooperate with NsP to respond to any requests for information or other relevant orders of the MPUc. 11. Reimbursement Procedure: If audit expenses satisfy the criteria stated herein, NSP shall send a check to the WHHS within 30 days after receipt of the itemized statement. 12. Goodwill: The City agrees that each employee, independent contractor, or other person performing any duties required of the City under this agreement shall be instructed to refrain from taking any action that will damage or injure the - 2 - FOR DATE M OF PHONE ::'. ... .... i~ A;M. .....,... ..~' '. '.', ['M.E . ,P.M...' "~p~ " ' .' . l . . ' . .' .~. ~..dc.a... .~..... AAEACOOE NUMBeR, ' ,,'. EXTENSION , reputation or goodwill a.SP. Should an event occur tha.olates this provision, the City and NSP will mutually agree as to the appropriate measures to be taken. 13. Idemnity: The City shall defend and hold NSP harmless against any claim, loss, judgment or liability, whether based on contract or tort liability, arising' out of the performance or failure to perform under this Agreement, or any claimed defect in supplies or m.aterials provided. This section shall s~ive the completion of, or termination of, this Agreement or any breach thereof: 13a The WHHS shall defend and hold NSP and the City harmless against any claim, loss, judgement or liability, whether based on contract or tort liability, arising out of the performance or failure to perform under this Agreement, or any claimed defect in supplies or materials provided. This section shall survive the completion of, or termination of this Agreement or any breach thereof. WHHS shall have the following insurance: (1) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy (including owned and hired vehicles) with a $600,000.00 combined single limit policy which includes protection against personal injury and property damage; (2) Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insuran'te policy (including owned and hired vehicles) with a $600,000.00 combined single limit policy which includes protection against personal injury and property damage; (3) Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Minnesota laws; and (4) In such insurance policy shall name NSP as an additional insured. A certificate of insurance shall be forwarded to NSP. This section shall survive the completion of, or termination of this Agreement or any breach thereof. 14. Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence Tn 0..'1 I I ~ and shall continue through December 31, 1990 and then shall continue for successive periods of one year, provided, however, that either party may, for its sole convenience, terminate this Agreement upon thirty days written notice to the other party. In the event that NSP terminates this contract, the City and the WHHS shall be entitled to recover for all services performed prior to receipt of a notice for termination, but no amount shall be allowed on unperformed services. 15. All information should be sent by United States mail, postage thereon prepaid. The WHHS shall direct information to the appropriate NSP representative as discussed in the Reporting Requirements section. The correct addresses and telephone numbers are as follows: - 3 - ..~ General Office .dinator Scott Getty (612) 330-6361 Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall. Minneapolis, MN 55401 All notices from NSP to the WHHS shall be sent to: WHHS Arlit' f!:. Lo...rson LtJ,~.J- J.I~^n',n,'^ }{"mo..n SerU:LL.J .""00 V..rni1n Avt!... ~. 'it': Li!tu;j fo-rlc, f71A S"S""I' I. Regional R.sentative - , Notices horn NSP to S ~.....~~... '" d to be sentto: (3rd Party) '\tLn ~'1 "" ....n"e..U." L :~..... t'l t' S h 0" e..'-LJ "" d . "\7":$ c..~ul\""r-.... c:..\.. \., ~t\. \ S~"'~"""'llO..:l L mn ~~~'~d All parties shall be entitled to rely and act upon notices sent pursuant to this section. IN WITNESS WHEREOFt the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first above written. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY By: THE CITY OF Title: By: Title: 3RD PARTY We s tHen n e pin Hum a n S e r v ice s By: - 4 - Title: Executive Director . . Attachment A west hennepin human services planning board 4100 vernon avenue south, st. louis park, minnesota 55416 " WCZlt bcrnncrpln human lcuvlccrl . 920-5533 CUSTOMER RELEASE FORM HOME ENERGY CHECKUP PROGRAM I HEREBY AUTHORIZE NORTHERN STATES POWER TO RELEASE MY ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION DATA TO WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENERGY SAVINGS I MAY ACHIEVE BY IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDED ELECTRIC CONSERVATION MEASURES. (SIGNATURE) (ADDRESS) (CITY/STATE/ZIP) -----------------------------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------- NUMBER OF cr. HOUSEHOLDS WIIO NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF RENT ABOVE 185% BELOW 185% ELDERLY DISABLED SINGLE PARENTS MINNE'fONKA 2 1 1 0 1 0 MONTHLY TOTAL FOR ' Ft HOUSEHOLDS 'fIlA'l' RENT 2 1 1 0 1 0 rt lU n -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~- MONTHLY TOTALS: 120 104 12 30 5 6 ~ rt tx:l * WHERE WI!: WERE UNABJ..E 'fO OB'l'AIN ALL DATA . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCIL Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Braneel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 TO: MAYOR. OOUN::ILMEMBERSAND MEMBERS OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORY BOARD ALAN ROLEK. FINANCE DIRECTOR ~ FROM: DA TE: MAY 10. 1990 SUBJECT: 1989 ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT Attached for your review is the 1989 Annual Financial Audit Report for the City of Shorewooo. Also included is the audit management letter and le t te r of in te rnal con t rol. The annual a~dit of the city's financial statements is required by law to exanine the city's compliance with legal requirements and with generally accepted accounting principles. The auditor examines the city's .financial condition and other financial data and canments on these in the audit management letter. The audit management letter points out improvements in procedures and certain areas in several different funds that the City Council may want to addres s in the coming months. These areas will be discussed in greater detail by Gary Groen of Abdo. Ab do & Eick. the City's auditing firm. in the audit presentation on May 14. Please review the audit report and give me a call if you have any questions or canments. I will be happy to discuss any part of the audit report with you. cc: Larry Whittaker A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ . . ABDO, ABDO & EICK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1060 NORTHLAND PLAZA, 3800 WEST 80th STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE 612-835-9090 FAX 612-896-3620 Member of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Offices In: Bloomington Mankato Owatonna May 8, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Shorewood Shorewood, Minnesota Dear Council Members: We have audited the financial statements of the City of Shorewood, Minnes6ta for the year ended December 31, 1989 and have issued our report dated March 23, 1990. We have not performed any substantive auditing procedures subsequent to that date. As part of our audit, we have made a study and evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards. The purpose of our study and evaluation was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements. Our study and evaluation, made for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph, would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the system. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal accounting control of the City of Shorewood taken as a whole. Our study and evaluation disclosed that even though the City has a sman office staff, your organization has segregation of duties to the extent practicable. Internal accounting control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your organization is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important, however, that you are aware of this condition. The following is a listing of other items that warrant your review: Special Assessments Special assessments are a significant revenue source earmarked to repay bond principal and interest. The Deputy City Clerk is responsible for maintaining the assessment records, certifying new assessment roles to the County and collecting and notifying the County of any amounts prepaid. Currently, the Finance Department is not involved in maintaining, updating or reconciling the assessment records with the County. We recommend the Finance Department be responsible for superv1s1ng the maintenance, certification and reconciliation of special assessment records. Page Two . . ABoo, ABoo & EICK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Currently, the City is assessing an equalization charge against properties hooking into the sewer system. The assessments, if not prepaid, are certified to the County for collection over a four year period. The assessments are credited to the 1971 and 1972 Sewer Improvement Bond Fund (the bonds are now defeased) . We recommend in the future the City consider using a hookup charge or an availability charge system payable in one installment. This fee would be credited to the Sewer Operating Fund and be designated for future repair and maintenance. We believe this type of a system would be easier to administer. Contract Documents During the audit we examined various contract and bid documents. The bid documents we reviewed were in the files of the public works department and other contract documents were not readily accessible. We recommend all contract, bid and other legal documents be centrally filed in a neat and orderly manner for ease of reference. General Fund The fund balance at December 31, 1989 was $953,875 which is an increase of $182,277 over the prior year. The fund balance is approximately fifty percent of the 1989 budgeted expenditures. The entire fund balance in 1989 is designated for working capital. In prior years the fund balance required for working capital was included as part of the undesignated balance. The designation is in response to a League memo dated April 16, 1990 in which they suggested the fund balance required for working capital be specifically identified. In addition, a portion of the fund balance beyond your working capital requirements should be designated for contingencies, capital outlay program requirements, etc, as appropriate. The fund balances of cities will be a topic of considerable discussion as the legislature struggles with its own budget problems. Debt Service Funds 1989 Transactions During 1989 several debt service transactions took place. The 1971 and 1972 Sewer Improvement bonds outstanding were defeased. The fund balance of $409,887 plus the special assessments receivable are available to be used at the Council's discr~tion for any public purpose. The Council should carefully examine all the opportunities available for the use of these funds. It is a source of funds available to the City which cannot be replenished. In addition, permanent bonds were issued to replace the temporary bonds issued to finance the Shorewood Oaks improvements. Page Three . . ABoo, ABoo & EICK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1974 Sewer Improvement The fund balance plus the future special assessments will not be sufficient to repay all the bonds outstanding. An additional source of funding will be required over the remaining four years of the bond. Southeast Project This fund has a fund balance deficit of $90,541 at year end. Financing sources have been identified to eliminate this deficit. The deficit will be eliminated by a transfer from the Southeast Water Debt Service Fund. The transfer was reviewed and approved by the City's bond counsel. Water Enterprise Fund The Water Fund reported operating income of $12,418 in 1989. The fund still has a cash deficit of $36,615 at year end. Because the revenues have not been sufficient, the G.O. Water Revenue Bonds have been repaid through a tax levy. We recommend the Council review the Water Fund operation and establish rates which are sufficient to cover the fund's operating costs, meet its debt service requirements, and establish cash reserves for major maintenance needs. Sewer Fund In 1989 the estimated costs of Sewer Improvements prior to 1978 were recorded in the City's accounting records. The additional depreciation recorded in the 1989 expenses was $160,638. Because of this the Sewer Fund reported a net loss of $49,596 in 1989 compared to a net income of $29,454 the previous year. * * * * * This report is intended solely for th~Juse of management and the council. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature and should be read in this context. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this, please contact us. Thank you for the opportunity to be of continued service to you, and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. Sincerely, ABDO, ABDO & EICK Certified pu~~ Accountants !~.1oen. ::- . . . APRI2S :a Q.Aw - ~ \)\ 'C..A~E... J~LL- ow YYl.oR..E:. -G v)jt.. ~C~ :T~E I TD u......y Pr-, Z 0 62..0 <..L UL1::U-:l1 LW ?i1"'"Ri~ j:\ ~n b ,...:q-t\.. '.:L W 0 '-..l..L '0 L \ \<. tJ To ~-6 G:, IS -r- LA2G::,E.. '/).............., \)~"T ~'R... All"":,\:) ~~/A.t,) 6 ~ E. .~~e. ~E. Y"Y\t.:::.\.!E.b) ~~~..-"-,, -C-~,-'~ -L' W 'L-L '\2, E; A'?::,L E To A- ~FC.<. 0 t..LEAN ~ lit""\ f::::"'ibL~ l~ "-; /.....~.-.. A L-t.. \\-\ E. ~6 PEtL.\y", l/--h'~ 1 ~ Te-tLS ~i~(D.0 O~ 17 :v\E, ~C:>i..-t.K CO~ U c.~~G~ l'S 6 ~EATL...~ ~R..lO'AtE.D ~ \. I I'V\ t::. Au"C) .. '. ~~:,".'..i :~._~ -s '/J~c..~y '1~Rs LA-v"LR-Y 'L. ..JOt-t ~crJ 2(:) 826 .LuLE W\; 0 ~~ {. {P. \. I-j- .. .1'.. "a .. . . 4~jJ~~.,L- );t-!. -r:...J " flll/Ci() MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Wanen . CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474..3236 DATE: 27 March 1990 PROPERTY LOCATION: PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.: . 20820 Idlewild Path 26-117-23-14-0015 C, \ ~ ()--~ 9J '0, X,U cPr- ~'O If 0';:/ .~'/ TO: Larry & Linda Johnson 20820 Idlewild Path Shorewood, MN 55331 NOTICE TO REMOVE Offensive and Unhealthy Substances NOTICE IS HEREBY GI\~N that there exists a condition on the above referenced property which is in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 of the Shorewood City Code, a copy of which Section is enclosed. The offensive matter to be removed from the property includes the following: Approximately five (5) cubic yards of debris: (wood; old chairs, drums, bicycles, tires, lawn mowers) One (1) m~torcycle - inoperable and unlicensed; One (1) motorcycle not registered to property owner You are hereby required to remove the above-described matter and any other offensive matter located on the property and in violation of Chapter 501, Section 501.01 within ten (10) days from the date hereof. In the alternative, you may file a written notice of appeal at the Shorewood City Hall within ten (10) days, in which case your appeal will be set for hearing at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. If you do not respond to this Notice within ten (10) days, the City shall take whatever action as may be necessary to have the offensive matter removed. The costs incurred by the City for such removal shall be charged to the property owner and become a lein against the property ***PLEASE GIVE THIS MATTER YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION*** BY ORDER OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY COUNCIL. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ~ ~ ~ ~: A_, ... -. ~...._ .#.-.',~_'-., - I ,...~: - ~ .; . -e- SHOREWOOD MEMO: TO: FROM: DATE: 10 May 1990 Mayor and City Council Brad Nielsen "Attachment No. 7 - Memo" is not included in this packet. It is intended to be reported verbally. .. 7 " . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 14EMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 25 APRIL 1990 RE: MULLENBACH, DONALD - SIMPLE SUBDIVISION/LOT AREA VARIANCE . FILE NO.: 405 (90.07) BACKGROUND Mr. Donald Mullenbach has requested a simple subdivision of his property, located. at 5530 StlciwbeLry- Lane \ see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). The property is zoned R-1A, Single-Family Residential and contains approximately 67,315 square feet in area. The applicant requests a variance to allow the lots to be smaller than 40,000 square feet in area. The property is currently occupied by the applicant's home and an outbuilding, shown on Exhibit B. Parcel A will contains 32,717 square feet of area and Parcel B will contain 34,598 square feet. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS The Mullenbachs purchased their property in the late 1960's with the intent of splitting it at a later date. The legal description for their lot extends to the approximate center of Smithtown Road on the north side and to the approximate center of Strawberry Lane on the east side. According to their attorney's title opinion, neither road was ever dedicated nor were road easements ever granted. Based on the legal description of the property, they have approximately 87,110 square feet of area. As can be seen on Exhibit B, Strawberry Lane has only 25 feet of right-of-way to the east of the subject site. If the division is approved it should be subject to the applicant providing a twenty-five foot easement for Strawberry Lane. This requirement is consistent with what has been required for all recent past subdivisions along Strawberry Lane. Acquisition of the easement will bring Strawberry Lane up to standard width for city streets. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore g . . Re: Mullenbach, Donald Simple subd./lot area variance 25 April 1990 The applicant has agreed to provide a 50-foot easement on the north side for Smithtown Road. This will align the south side of Smithtown Road between Westlawn Two Addition to the west of the subject site and Pebble Brook Addition to the east. The accessory building on the site is grossly substandard in terms of setbacks. with the acquisition of the easement for Strawberry Lane, the shed will be on or possibly over the easement line. Furthermore, once the property is divided, the building becomes a nonconforming use - an accessory building without a principal use. It is recommended that the shed either be removed from the site or moved onto the buildable area of Parcel A. Ordinarily subdivisions are required to be recorded within 30 days of Council approval. The applicant's have requested additional time for financial reasons. It is recommended that the deadline for recording be extended to 90 days. RECOMMENDATION The proposed subdivision requires a 5402 square foot variance for Parcel B and a 7283 square foot variance for Parcel A. Nevertheless the request is considered reasonable, particularly in view of the amount of road easement being required for Smithtown Road and Strawberry Lane. The removal of the shed also eliminates an existing nonconformity. It is therefore recommended that the division and variance be approved subject to the following: 1. The applicant must provide a 50 foot road easement on the north side and 25 feet on the east side of the subject site. 2. Drainage and utility easements must be provided 10 feet along the west side of the two lots and 10 feet on each side of the new property line. 3. The applicant must pay $500 in park dedication fees (credit is allowed for the lot with the house on it). 4. The shed must be moved division is released. prior to removing the should be required to or removed before the resolution approving the If the applicant wishes to record the division building, a $1000 cash escrow or letter of credit ensure completion within six months. 5. The division must be recorded within 90 days of the Council's approval. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Don Mullenbach - 2 - ... -~ - D 'i+ "'~ .~~ } ,,~ ;~'\t , o ..i ~ ~..c ~ 1.t ~-'o on w a: CD "" ,.: N CD N to-~~ S! -- ... <> J ~ - i'l~ '\<:~, ) .. ~. G ",\-Jf" .... ,- ;!' '/ co ~ ::! atl .., - ': liil ~ - ;;; ~ ll; .... CD zg ~ ~ d C= ryj) 13 '" ):l ., ":II _ .....7.... - ;n '" ., ~ -,,<] : \o'YJ \ : r . --------l-------------------- , i : <.) ~ :G _,,'J . ')-':P -------1----------------,---- ..............i....OO;' .......-...-...... ~ ~):...... ' !! t:~~!!' e @ i s -~'; ~; ':;;,:___j_______~____.: l!> ! &I g '!! !! '" .. i ~ . = :t . ~ . L I S311 to' 9Z , .) ,\', \h ,tA' <./) ~ ,., '"'~ ... - tt'LfI ~ ...... ~ .~ :!i \~) 40\. ) >9ll '3i1. Q C .. $j ;01: Li'ell . ,LI.OIl J \) ",} t l\. {,) \ Q '\ ~~ ~ ..... \i) 1 p ") \j) !:: . ... -~ N= ~ ea ~ - ..- N <lZ .... ~ .~ tt'Lt' tt'Ltl ~ ~ ~ :<it -. ~ ... ~\ .~ !: .... .. 1ft ~ ::: ~ co II) ~ "- 0-, .(" ) ..eo.OIl !lO'm i~': ! ; ~ ~: /) ....! I:, ~ ~,: . ' ~~ .~, E ~: ~(..~l in '1 I -: I ' - I ;.........091 ..1".:4-~.......191 .....u....: :~ ,,'.JJ; : lzg ~-~) i: : : - -~) : I : <r) \; v3' l;? \1'-.- ~ ~ ... ~ <> ::t . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! la' . & o .... ~ i' 't 'b ) . ) \) \.() 01:1 _~,!___ __ --1 'OSi ~,:=, 1")JO.,z ::! 'O)~o'" >!; ~ !!! ... I {:..\t I~ Ot~ .... ~ ...!:: ~ 11;1 I~ >!;t Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Mullenbach - Subdivision/lot area variancE --, \ ,~ ii= - - ~,.. - '\' '" J . . R 0 A 0 S 89"13'22-W 185.00 -t; - :~~tT~~~ C;~;~'V~~I~ NOtfh line 0' Lot 10, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 247 I --L::~'.t_~_~~'_~'i:___,~~~'."'.,.' ~__ _ _._.'____ SMITHTOWN 12-eGDY't\""~~ ... ~'" t-.lO-\- to ~4 k II 1...... ....... ~!l~ ,. ~ot\(.D",f() (~~ '"" ;~::. ~-::., .:;:/. ,::[ -.J i'... V,i U..: ::;:.. ,.;~ .5(5' 1'.. -~ '&5 25 I "p ~ I I c:: ~I\ i""A I ~"1 ~~ " ? }.'; 1..lA.1' r\~ I CD :J A ' ~...J : ~ f '7,"0 so Ft., ; ~ ~ l "'""~OO~ \ : . ~,,',",< <.:--.,W- :~? 1'1 2 m " "I. ; 1"\" ',..., ~ : ~ 5(>'!'" :;: I ~ ;; ;, ~ \'.,' > -' 0 185.00 '0 0 . 10' 5 89 13'22 W ("'j ~ rn' C'I ",.- porDII~1 I rh nur'h~o' I()~ ., AUOI TORS S IVISION NO, 241 i.I..; 4" ~ 0'"1 ,jb..; \~ i..... I c) ~;:':;" ' l. .J I ~ . 50,-J ,opo~so J,.' 5()I---I'1 l-...~ ~ 1 I~~ :, ~<t' :;; I i ,~ I roo I' o ~ ~ " ~ o <; .. ~ ,~ ... 89 13'22 E 195,00 L Line paraUel with Ihe nor,h Iin~ 01 Lol 10 AUDITORS SU8DIVIS/ON NO, 247 '" :z: m 0 o ~ .... > " - o .... III . :0 o '" o 'g ~ o 25.00," 0 .~ I :J 7. .. .., '" ~>- '" w en ~ <( 165 25 500,' a: J- CJ) ~--~-- - -, w 2 :~~.: <( t.... c) () <i: ... .., '" d :z: ? ;; -' ,..... -:; ~ . cc en o "' ..J a: n: :-'-.; :"....~ f.!:! Exhibit B PROPOSED DIVISION , MEMORANDUM . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 26 'APRIL 1990 RE: GAY, RICHARD - C.U.P. FOR ACCESSORY SPACE IN EXCESS OF 1000 SQ. FT. . FILE NO.: 405 (90.08) BACKGROUND Mr. Richard Gay has requested a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4) of the Zoning Code to build a detached garage which will put the total an~unt of accessory space on his property over 1000 square feet in area. The property, l~cated at 5695 Howards Point Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached), contains approximately 183,635 square feet of area (4.2 acres) and is zoned R-1C, Single-Family Residential. Mr. Gay currently has a two-level. attached garage with 624 squa.re feet per floor. He proposes to convert the lower level to living space and then build a 24' x 30',720 square-foot, detached garage to the south and west of his house (see Exhibit B). Total accessory space will be 1344 square feet. The footprint area of his existing home is approximately 1898 square feet. Converting the existing garage will bring it to 2522 square feet. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION Following is how the applicant's request complies with Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.d.(4): a. The total area of accessory space (1344 square feet) does not exceed the footprint size of the house (2522 square feet). b. The total area of accessory s.tructures does not exceed 2000 square feet (10 percent of the minimum lot size requirement for the R-1C district). A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 9 . . " Re: Gay, Richard C.U.P. - Access. space 26 April 1990 c. The proposed building complies with the setback requirements. of the R-1C district. d. The proposed building is in keeping with the principal structure (see Exhibit C). The gable roof and redwood siding are consistent with the existing house. Based upon the preceding, it is recommended that approval of Mr. Gay's Lequest be granted as presented. . BJN: ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Richard Gay - 2 - "" r .6,/)5 (3) 911133 i51'. 17 .----too---- .'..\ tJ"tt ~ ~~) _ ,%\1 '@ ~to~~ ~~~ t-'. ..~.. :...\) ~ 1116. .. .1 i ... OUlLOI I ( 15) . ~[O)[O)OO ( 12) . .~ 1 . )//1r 040 ~. G (8) ~ l s p!~ TRACT ~ .5r '/5 ~biec..~~ .~.~-t~.. H (9) ~.'7 r. .; '/1."- OUTlOI 8 em 7 ( 10) 5 ( 10) ,OVT LOT 2 @ @ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Gay C.li.P. (7) ... a; ~" .... ~;. 'li:'" (8) i! w; ~ \" ;, . . ,. ...- bL'l.1~ '-, I \ I \ I I ~ ~ ,\ ~ II ... .... ~ ., - ~ ~~ t.t Q ""() "%-4;; CO f'l) 2 ~ . --lJ -S ,.l. W ... U ~ ~ ~ '" ~ <:) 11\ ~ <l. III \) iii io. b\ ~ 'b ~ ~ s ::t: \1 -Q ..... .. ~ \0 ~ ~~. ....... ti'.... . ....)( ':>~~ ~~~~ ~ " ~ <-,IL-.- ! ~-Q .o~ ... "'.. 0~ ,,11-;1'/ ~ ... ~ ~ l:lo ..'I<. ~ ~ .... ",tJ$ \ \ I \ I I ,~- 'L'6~ ,. -.... \' Exhibit B SITE PLAN . I I '1 I I ----! ~...., ," " .a" ',' \~::~'?J~ " '';'.>.:..'' . . ~..: ':.; -';" ,f:' ";;... ,_:' ::.'. ....---------.._~, . ' .., ;:1'.-........ --..-......-..;1 ! !I \;. p ,~ .' ...- _ "'u__~.. .. I.. 1i ,,., h :1: .- .... i I :1: ! ; Ii "I 11 I,' II I I .:! I ~ . ! i j '~_:.. ....JL......o.J ,.... .' . ~.. '.:" '-'~-":' ~ I (;.- ..... " "j i- -..... . f I I ~ ! ; 1 '. I ::1 ~ 1 ! ~ i; ~ ~ ! i i I i , , I' ii'l r i i l 1'1 I .11 ,. I. I '" i:l! Ii Ii J': I:' I . ~I ;. ' : '.iJ i L: :1, ,~. '\.---... _...J -_._.. . III' ,-, .. .---,..,-.. ---.... 'ii . . III . .... !:~._,.. ,---.....-___..JI .' n !'L ' ,. . /-1 i... .. ..________ __ ._ :- , ~. ; ".' /'/ . ". ;', ... ':-"~' r'.. ~ /...... .I.:" '~'i '( .~ ", f,_ , .. " r;' \, ., O' ,/- 'jl/ ~, ,. {( . . \'~'.\. \..\ ~, '.~. (~\ .~'. \\ \" '.~: 1'-' ". '.:,; . . \\'. h i.;::;:-..,,";""=::..;;",";:'i-::;r.m.:::'~~~.... ~. Ii I "'1 l' .\. ::.'( . '\-. '... i~"""'.~~=~1i ~\.; ::- - . , . 1 ~ 1 \\l + ;~ ). ( () .- .~ '5 .qI ". ..c +. c,.,. o. .-t.. ..:'; " .. .: , '. , , ., l t ',\ "' I: ,', '.. '" C .0 ,- Exhibit C BUILDING ELEVATIONS -(' Y""" MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CI'IY COUNCIL FROM: AI. ROLEK DATE: MAY 11, 1990 RE: RECOMMENDATION FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND SUP PORT SYSTEM FOR CITY OFFICES BACKGROUND /PROCES S The process of investigating computer_ solutions for the city offices began in 1989. The City staff, with the aid of a computer consultant, identified the computer needs for the city offices and drafted a s;chedule for acquisition and implementation of software and ha rdware to fulf ill those needs. It was determined that the most immediate concerns were for financial applications, such as Fund and Budgetary Accounting, Payroll, and Utility Billing; common applications, such as word processing, spreadsheeting and data base management; and workstations en for the city office staff. In February, 1990 Requests For Proposals were sent out to several software vendors relating to our hardware, software and support needs. We received seven proposals back from those vendors. The proposals we re analyzed by city staff and the consult an t using the criteria se t forth in the Request For Proposal and weighed the attributes of each vendor's products against the 0 thers. Upon comple tion of this step, four vendors were selected for further study. Among these vendors were Precision Computer Systems, Computoservice, Inc., Business Records Corporation and Banyon Data Systems. City staff attended demonstrations of the products of each of these four vendors in which we were able to see and get a feel for the quality of the vendors, their prograns and their hardware. After seeing the' demonstrations and discussing the attributes of the prcxiucts, the technology involved, and future applications, it became apparent that the two companies TNh ich best f it the ne eds of the City, bo th n ow and in the future, were Precision Computer Service and Computoservice, Inc. Both vendors have adopted a UNIX operating system, which is a multi-user system that is rapidly becoming the industIY standard. This system involves an "open system" approach, similar to MS-IOS, ra ther than a proprietary approach, such as the System 36. It gives the City greater flexibility in selecting future software applications. Both systems would also allow the City to run MS-DOS prograns as well. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore /D .. PAGE '!WO COMPUTER RECOMMENDATION MEMO MAY 11, 1990 Reference checks were done on ea::h of these vendors. Several users of each of the two companies' products were contacted and questioned about the products they were using. We received positive feedback for both vendors. The biggest difference in opinion between the two companies was in the area of service and support. We received excellent reports in this area for Precision Computer Services. Computoservice had experienced some service and support problems in the pas t. Users of their products reported glitches in support and la::k of responsiveness on the part of Computoservice. However, the users also reported that vomputoservice had made changes in this area and that they had become much more responsive to their needs in recent months. . Our process was complicated, sanewhat, by the MNDOT cost sharing plan for computer equipnen t that a rose this s pring. However, the MNDOT proposal was compatible with the equipment of the vendors being considered and, therefore, was easily worked into the proposals. BUDGET AND SYSTEM COST Attachment A outlines the budge t available for the computer system. It takes into account unexpended computer equipnen t budgets from 19&9 and the amount budgeted for 1990. Attachment B shows the costs for each of the two companies being considered. The costs for each vendor are very close both for acquisition and on a five-year operating cost basis. It is clear that the budget will cover the cost of either system. CONSULTING SERVICES The aid of Jim Stem of Chapel Consulting, Inc.,. in evaluating the City's computing needs and the proposals received has been invaluable. He has spent many hours helping the staff weed through the piles of data while staying within the City's consulting budget. His expertise in this area has proven to be a great as set dur ing this entire process. Upon selection of the computer vendor, Jim will have fulf illed his original contractual obligations. It is felt that his expertise could be useful in the stages follwing vendor selection in nego tia ting con tracts and implenenta tion of the system. He has quoted fees of $30cr-600 for contract negotiation and $100 per hour for an estimated 60 hours over a nine-m:mth implementation period. CONCLUSION AND REx::OMMENDATION The vendors being considered both offer excellent solutions to the City's computer needs, both now and into the future. Both offer excellent hardware (IBM and Unisys) and excellent software applications, and both have a large custoner base. The factor which comes to the fore-front between the vendors is service and support. In dealing with the two companies, and in talking with their other custoners, it became evident ~ PAGE THREE COMPUTER RECOMMENDATION MEMO MAY 11. 1990 that Precision Computer Systems held the edge in this area. They have an excellent rapport with their users and a record of excellent service. Computoservice. while making strides in custaner service in recent months. has been known to have problems in this area in the past. In our dealings with these companies. we have experienced a higher "comfort" level with Precision Computers than with Computoservice. and a greater level of responsiveness. Precision Computers also is least costly over a five year period and offers an excellent platform upon which the City and build and grow in the future. With this in mind. It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of application software and Unisys hardware from. rrecision Computer Service at a cost of $64.275. A contingeny for unknown factors should also be considered and is recanmended in an amount not to exceed $5.000 over the implementation period. It is further recommended that the City Council retain Chapel Consulting. Inc.. for negotiating ha rdware and software contracts at a cost of $300. and for system implementation at a fee of $100 per hour. not to exceed 60 hours over a nine-mon th period. ,~t should be kept in mind that this will be an on-going process for the City. Other applications are planned to be impleuented in the next few years and will be budgeted in the future. The continuation of this process each year will help to ensure that the City's computer system is an ever-more useful tool for the s taf f in the future. It is the goal of the staff to maintain and enhance its computer capabilities in the future. The City Council is encouraged to ask questions regarding the options and is welcome to inspect the proposals submitted by the vendors. 1 t would be helpful for you to call with any questions they may have prior to Monday night meeting. This would allow staff to do any research necessary to find satisfactory answers to your questions. ". " A TTACHMENT A CCMPUTER BUDGET 1989 UNEXPENDED BUDGE T AMJUNI'S I FINANCE DEE' ARTMENl' PLANNING DEP AR TMENl' WATER FUND SEtvER FUND SUBTOTAL $ 4.000 5. 5 00 4.000 6.000 $l9.500 1990 UNEXPENDED BUDGET AMOUNI'S MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS WATER FUND SEWER FUND SUBTOTAL $30.000 6. 5 00 8.500 45.000 TOTAL BUDGE T $64.500 ATTACHMENT B CCMPUTER SYSTEM OOST CCMPARISON PRECISION COMPUTER OOMPUTOSERVICE HARDWARE & SYSTEM SOFTWARE 1. CPU/FILE SERVER, DISK, TAPE, CABLES, O/S, UTILITIES 2. WORKSTATION EMULATION 3. MODEM & SOFT. FOR REMOTE SUP PORT 4. REPORT PRINTERS 5. LASER PRINTERS 6. WORKSTATIONS - PC & OONSOLE SUBTOTAL $23,095 495 595 920 " 2,200 ": 14. 793 42,098 $23,363 380 1,144 1.760 12,546 39, 193 APPLICATION SOFTWARE 1. PAYROLL 2. UTILITY BILLING 3. FUND/BUDGET ACCOUNTING 4. REPORT WRITER SUBTOTAL 4,700 5.150 3 . 80 0 1.500 15.150 7 ,500 OTHER COSTS 1. INSTALLATION & .c:REIGHT 2. TRAINING 3. UPS/POWER PROTECTION 4. FILE CONVERSION 5. DOCUMENTATION SUBTOTAL 1.700 1.500 1.000 1.500 INCLUDED 5.700 6.440 3.850 1, 000 1 .500 INCLUDED 12.790 LESS: TRADE-IN OF SYSTEM 36 (4,000) (3 ,500) SUBTOTAL FROM VENDOR 58.948 55 ,9 83 LESS: VALUE OF EQUIP. FRCM MNDOT (5. 153) (4,231) PLUS: ACTUAL COST OF MNDOT EQUIP. 4.890 4,890 LASERJET III PRINTER (AMERIDATA) 1. 5 90 1,590 OTHER SOFTWARE (WORD PROCESS. SPREADSHT, D/B MGMT) 4,000 5,000 TOTAL SYSTEM COST $64.275 $63,232 FUTURE EXPANSION/UPGRADE 5,000 TOTAL FIVE YEAR COST 4,796 $93, 255 6.454 $95,502 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE . . SHOREWOOD MEMO: DATE: May 10, 1990 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Al Rolek Item No. 10 on the Agenda for Monday, May 10, 1990 - PROPOSALS FOf COMPUTERS, will be under separate cover. It) 113 119 114 1H 1n no . . STREET OVERLAY AND APPURTENANCE WORK PROJECT NO. 90-1 SHOREWOOP, MINNESOTA BIDS OPENED: May 8, 1990 11:30 A.M. CONTRACTOR A L t3rl: COIJ ~ 7:j'u (Tltj,..J ,~L F ;( A.-:j fJ.r /) Co}..) $. T. . .4 IV..- $. ~/J C 01< fi ~ 118 e i!'-! ~ IJ fY1 ~ G /VI II CST /~A~ I /111 ;h LUt);U 7,A.1 G..- o ~ If! t/Vf :::. f '{;# 'i It L"- :r~,-. E '-!' IlA t.J fA) IV c . A ~f1I!I-(';1 Cof~. 112 116 115 E Ai c-/ j'IJ~ 1:..4. ~ E:<;;. II /k 4- r.c:..- 1t j!3q/9()() *Denote~ Corrected Figure ORR,SCBELENJMAYERON , ASSOCIATES, INC. BID SECURITY TOTAL BID .00 Employer's Seaboard Se ur' American Institute Capital lnde . USA Fidelity Guara USA Fidelity G ara I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RECEIVED ON: DATE Mav 8. 1990 By OSH Comm. No. 4579.00 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLED( Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes I~~./ ;: . . ADDENDUM NO.1 CONTRACf DOCUMENTS FOR STREET OVERLAY AND APPURTENANCE WORK PROmCf NO. 90-1 SHOREWOOD,MINNESOTA Contract Document Dated: This Addendum Dated: April 9, 1990 May 7, 1990 This addendum shall be attached to the Contract Document and shall be included as part of said Contract Documents. Items herein shall take precedence over any clauses which they modify in the Contract Documents or portions of drawings which they modify or supplement. BID DATE: May 8, 1990 at 11:30 AM. NOTE: The intent of this addendum is to clarify the intent of the No.3 Bid Proposal Item "Bituminous Mixture for Patching (Incl. Bituminous). This line item is intended to cover the leveling as well, prior to overlaying. In the past the City has done the patching and leveling prior to bidding the street work. Patching and leveling is included in the Contractors bid items this time. The majority of this line item will be available for use as leveling. Following are three minor changes in the Contract Documents defIning these items. REFER TO DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK 02341 - PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS SURFACE - MnjDOT 1. 02341.1 - DESCRIPTION: The second sentence should be corrected to read as follows: A fabric underlayment andj or patching andj or leveling is to be installed prior to the overlay. 4579.00 ADDENDUM NO. 1 PAGE 10F2 . . 2. 023412 - MATERIALS: The last sentence in the second paragraph should be corrected to read as follows: Patching and/or leveling with rolling using the same wear course mixture will be required as directed by the Engineer prior to the installation of tack and fabric. 3. 02341.4 - BASIS OF PAYMENT: The second sentence should be corrected to read as follows: A separate bid item for patching and/or leveling also includes the bituminous material for mixture. I hereby certify that this pl~ specifIcation or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I an1 a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~ -P. Y/~ James P. Norton P.E. Date: May 7, 1990 Reg. No. 11606 4579.00 ADDENDUM NO.1 PAGE 2 OF2 ~ . . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING A SPEED ZONE STUDY ON A PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD WHEREAS, it has been brought to the attention of the Shorewood City Council by residents of Near Mountain Boulevard that a special hazard may exist due to the configuration of the street; and WHEREAS, the present speed limit on Near Mountain Boulevard is 30 mph; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that, due to the configuration of the streets, this speed limit may be unreasonable and unsafe under the existing conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, that: 1. That the City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby requests the Commissioner of Transportation to authorize an engineering and traffic investigation to determine whether the speed limit on Near Mountain Boulevard should be changed. 2. That the Commissioner authorize the erection of appropriate signs on Near Mountain Boulevard designating the speed limit thereon to conform to the results of the investigation. 3. That the City Administrator be authorized to forward a copy of this Resolution to the appropriate office of the Minnesota Department of Transportation for follow-up and response. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, this 14th day of May, 1990. Jan Haugen, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator/Clerk Roll Call Vote: A yes - Nays - Idee c2 I: ~ r, ::~ 02 ~..~~ .~ r :- j I'~. .It...." "-. oft ~ - . ,-,-. '.. . \..-8, ::- r ',-. \ ,...).-- " 1-.... '\ - :.-::; :::. ."",\ I '..... . - __...~ . . APR \ 6 \990 Re: Request for speed limit sign and stop signs along Near Mountain Blvd. in Shorewood. We the undersigned McKinley Place residents, are concerned about the traffic along Near Mountain Blvd. Since the completion of Near Mountain Bl vd., connecting Vine Hi 11 and pI easant View roads, there has been a substantial incre~se in the number of cars through our neighborhood. Many of these cars travel above 30 mi 1 es per hour. Since most of us have young children or enjoy walking along Near Mountain Blvd., this is an important issue of safety to us. We believe that the following requests for traffic management would help to deter Unnecessary traffic, reduce overall traffic speed, and keep our neighborhood safe. 1. A posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour; 2. A stop sign at McKinley Pl. and Near Mountain, eastbound; 3. A stop sign at Whitney Cr. and Near Mountain, westbound; 4. stop signs at Chestnut Terr. and Near Mountain, both direcj:.ions; 5. stop-signs at silver Lake Trail and Near Mountain, both directions. Name Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- Y/k'fl~---- - -- --- - -- re(~ _~!md_Zi?l,.~_.))~<f2---- 3!JLVLch~m ~_c.. ~_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _~ L &5_C!k~f:.~_~~~~- ~1../(X..oJ....---- ~,,-u1. _7~------U2.;:--('Lc'&K,:L-L"'-~Ls/~~ ~-~ n_ ---n-------.J-'l?p5-kl.~~-fUa/--.s,~_;;;R-- : _ -zPd _. ~:.. _ ~ff}:L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ j_1.?:?? f- /'.!..~- lid... fi-~g!_ _~A~:. - - - -- 6 /,f ~ n / '1'1 II * II --.~~~~~~~~~-~-------------------------------------------- l fI J r ~ _~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L 1 J~ 5_ __J~..J_s:~~- t:-3!:!:":..~ ~'= ~!? _ _ _~_C1_'=='~='c::.'O ~42~_ ~_ __ _lL_ _ ____n~----'L-----;---------!---- ~J~~f~dff~-------:7t~---~~-~;~--~{~;:~cfJ -- -6I-j~L---"..------------ ----------------,,-~--- #. 11 UL TtT11' l/',//r' (ju' ~" {~ r-'[ ,/ _ _ n _ x:<.!.c.~.~cv?>J.i _.1 fA...::I.- _ /.d.'" _ _ _ __ _ _ -::'~ ~~ L~.&.;;~-"-",,,.:=,-r- :: - ~- - ~ i~"'~-~~'\- - - - y- Ll_'L_ ~~~Jl~t_"I~9,. ~ ~h,-~:d - - -- ::-~~-~~Pib~r~--~L~i'---~~~~~~~---'~~---- ----- l~~Uh/,/~ =' ~r:;, .Mi' {U)/'ntC. 1\ \,~. f\ /'L ~-J' f-I (j, :l'" ,,1/rr......1 ___ /l.lL\'yjJilL-~ _ d ~'L~~!...____1l.7.r......:.L\k.~_1.Y.u-L.-J1U-~-& ~JA.) :5 __ ~_'*:_~___ ~~----~q~Qh~~-~j--'-~'" . . Name Address ~~~~~t~~~~~-f;~~~~~~:~~~,~~~$ s~~sj~~-~,::t~4;:E~ ~~Z~~~::2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t{l~{/:1..L. :.. _ _ _ _ _ _ J::.. 2 .::~~ _ _!_:..':.. ~ _ _' _ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ .;. _ _ _ _..;;jf!?.~/t: / 18 a ... . '7 S ' _ _ _ <51'::!:.<-:::: _ _Q~~:)-:! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ (j j_",_:. _ _ _".::'.!.:-!-:_} _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _ - - - --- _&:::::: (( ~ ::~}6d~--~Jk~~,---~---~~3!---0L~ZA~!:~--_-~~~ 3 ~ _!?U...~~/..:Y~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~[j it2 _ _ _ tf~ _ _ _ _ ~:1_ fl.i _ _ _ _ _ _ 3::!Y:f:./~O c9-- ;;-~<:64r~4~-----~-~-Q~~-?f;f14.~1)?L--_~4-~~ O{;I.J t/A VVW t J L.. /44-/ ~~ - ~/ze ~~ .'- 23 Cl U. _J~~-' . (/ ,1 <5)' l ~~~J~t~~ ~~~:~~:~~ ~~ ~:~~~~~1ii~~~~~~: ~~~-~j~~:d 25 DJ t. ....-:> ".""7_, /' i .- .,/ I. 'Tt2:.// .::.. (. . J;) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .:.k- <-::.-: ~~_ _ _ _ _ _ ~ .! ~~::~ _ _' _ .:. ~ ~ ~=::'.=-- _ _ - - - - - - '- _..:~.:. ~2C ~ _ i:.vor> ' " .' [J ~ ~ ':r (; /l ~ ~ - J1A~g#r~~:r& -- -}! -"- '! -- - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - .:-:- ~ ~~.-':"~- ~ - Qof!!:o:.'f'~' 3~_~ J~ .d~,~ _ _ _ _ _ _!.!!:: Y.F... _~L}~~~_ _/~~-I:. ~ _ J?~~ ~ _ _ __ _,?~t..:'_:__('_l~='5'J 28 I") -}h. {, ~ 1 / Jl r 1 ..,' J <Jft. ' _ _ -l.14:l..~.0r- j14.~,~ t~L..:t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ! !.r f:. _1_ ~U'-:: jLu~. JH;/E _'_ _ - - - - - - !of.::. ~J,.!::t-ut 29 ;.?:; /l / ' f>' / v' /l . 1.t I ' _ _ _ ~,-,:f.t."-~... _ L~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _I:.OE 2:. _'-t../.61..~ j...,W- - - - - - - -;LJ~~~- 30 ; I ____~'t:.0:--_____ft!:I}_~_!4}..~(_7_l1!.iY__(Jg______A/'-::f~f.,~~ ~:_.~~~'-~---~I~~S-C~E~~'!~~.- _.Ci:'-__~~~'rff' :~_- _ ~1~---~tJJes:-JJjJt~-1l~--f--~~~KccL ~~_'_~_-----~~-----~Q.:JQ-~~--ihLflj 11 }~ ~~~_ijL)f:[(,'iliii!iH---~------H~-~:~,~:;,-------J1t.'@ffiL- " 35 c..:j'lt, ./..'/ f1'j~ . /~4.,- O';,.r...--/.)l.t.u u/J . ,Ii/: j//\U/J ~~~~~~~~::~Mir~~I1~~~~~~ ::,:r;~~C_~~~--(r.E2<;'.L{~6i~.tL-~_"~!~L- ;;'~~~.~~=-------~-~~-(h~'-~--~--L------~~~~~~-- _~__ ~~~~~~~___~-----~----~J2_---~--~------~~-- ~~- -(~~~~~---~----~~-----~~-~~---~-~------~~-------~~---~--- . . Re: Request for speed limit sign and stop signs along Near Mountain Blvd. in Shorewood. We the undersigned McKinley place residents, are concerned about the traffic along Near Mountain Blvd. Since the completion of Near Mountain Blvd., connecting Vine Hill and Pleasant View roads, there has been a substantial increase in the number of cars through our neighborhood. Many of these cars travel above 30 miles per hour. Since most of us have young children or enjoy walking along Near Mountain Blvd., this is an important issue of safety to us. We believe that the following requests for traffic management would help to deter unnecessary traffic, reduced overall traffic speed and keep our neighborhood safe. 1. A posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour; 2. A stop sign at McKinley Pl. and Near Mountain, eastbound; 3. A stop sign at WhitneyCr, and Near Mountain, westbound; 4. Stop:signs at Chestnut Terr. and Near Mountain, both directions; 5. stop signs at Silver Lake Tr. and Near Mountain, ,both directions. Name Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- ~ _0-~'COJj2:!.f:~~~'2 _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ 1:14..1.5_ J~).?i[Z__et: ~ _ _ ..51~C!~::_:E~cl... ~~ _ _ .?.?~3~~ L - - -- 2 c::. . ,; r-,' - - -- . \). r'-, , .... ') _ _ _~.d-J:. j::.~ '- ~~K ~_V:;. _ _ _ _ ~ 'j :/J,~ _ !.:JJ,.!-'~':' _ L :.. _ _ ~~,~':..<:.:-::::..'--- ~li~ - - S-r_.5_ ~ L - - - 3 1\~i1.L Tt . (' <L T.1 1.J.')1 <,-;;' L' <;...... j _ _J-'"\.l/i~!E. Q _ _.r=. _0_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ i../.J_'.S'_ _1:-J _'1f:!' ;_ _ _ &.JJ!..?.:tEc:..::::!::., lV~~ - - ~ f 2 i - --- ~ _~~Sih-!. _ _ T:hJ_:_ _ _ _ __ __ .Lc'l-'f:J_ __ E= j _h_P21~'f! _ _ ~~1~J. ~J_~:.. ~__!5~:1 11:.. - -- 5 ~ -,~/ _ r .-__.__;.: 17 ----- '. ,-t.' / .- .-'-;.-;> , _ _l-::'':5-!.: [.1_ _~::'=_~':. -:..-~ __ __ _ (.!d _'-_:'~ __~::-:.(/;..:.: - ~- ~!'!:-::-6;:~;~'2.!.:"::..:. - ?.?- ::"-j-- 6 : ~.' ..i" " I" I,"" ,_ t:. /. " - -. j. '-.. , .", ..."':'.,., _ _: .!::i1..~"l ,,-1_ l:rf:."Y ,h[::..~.!. _ _ _ iJ _tl.- ~ ~'_ _C:. ,../!:-(f ~ _-'- _C _ _ _'~ f.. 'f! ~\{ fLQ:] - !?}~ - :;. 'Z rlL -- .' // ~ _ il:.,t~fJ~" -9:::::~ --- !JflR - FJ"lc./.-l - It,__ -~ - -- - u_ - - - - - - - !!- - -- 8 ./;'tttcV;/ ~::: ( 9l.{ ct) ~ 11 'o.vJ- P-t; " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _':..6-L. _ _ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 9 ;' ') /.:.: j! (') -", ~. I . ., ( . _ _ _:.. _ ~..J.'_(~'\'- _'~t::..~;...___ - - - - - - - - - - -.... - - - - - - - - - -.... - - - - - - - - - - - - -.!. - - - -- 10 'J:? <" <' 5935 1'\. v.. 1eM /J~.. I 1 II I , __~<Q1~~~~___...._______D_~LlL-~~~Dt--------------....------ ~~_l~~~~i-~~~-----!~-------------~~----~~----~----- 12 ~ _ -; C~ 5 'f.;2 0 'IIA. k~1. _ t> J ,J 1. l MN S.i.H I ~;-~-~~~L------;_;~~.,,~:;~~-;;---J(J.I~~l'--:"---:---- ---~l~t~~~--1\------------~-d~---------------------------- ~ ~:!.~ r!_ Jd-'~ ~):. _ _ _ - - 5:' j !-': - - - - ~ ~ - - - -.:.... - - - - - ~ - -- - - -.... -:. - - - - ~ - - -- . . . Name Address ~~~~;;;:~~~~~~~~~!~:[~~~;;~t.~-;;ii;~~~~~~~~3i :~_~~ ~~~_?~~_~urn.klcl~~_-J?~~ sS ~;__~L_ilit_____u_S:l~fLILc,,~1!L]l------GS 33 j --------------------------~-------------------------------------- 19 --------------------~-------------------------------------------- 20 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 21 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 22 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 23 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 24 --------------------------------------------------------~-------- 25 -------------------------~--------------------------------------- 26 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 27 ----------------~------------------------------------------------ 28 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 29 -_:- - - - - -'- - - - - - - - -- -'.- - -- - - - -.~ - - - -- -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - -.- - - - -_.- - - - - - - - - -- 30 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 31 ------------------------~---------------------------------------- 32 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 33 ---------------------,------~------------------------------------- 34 -----------------~-----------~----------~-----~------------------ 35 --------------~~-~----------------------------------------------- 36 ----~--~---------------------~-~-----~--------------------------- 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 38 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 39 ----------------------------------------------------------------- . . Re: Request for speed limit sign and stop signs along Near Mountain Blvd. in Shorewood. We the undersigned McKinl ey PI ace residents, are concerned about the traffic along Near Mountain Blvd. Since the completion of Near Mountain Blvd., connecting Vine Hi 11 and PI easant View roads, there has been a substantial increase in the number of cars through our neighborhood. Many of these cars travel above 30 miles per hour. Since most of us have young children or enjoy walking along Near Mountain Blvd., this is an important issue of safety to us. We believe that the following requests for traffic management would help to deter unnecessary traffic, reduce overall traffic speed, and keep our neighborhood safe. 1. A posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour; 2. A stop sign at McKinley pl. and Near Mountain, eastbound; ,3. A stop sign at Whitney Cr. and Near Mountain, westbound; 4. stop signs at Chestnut Terr. and Near Mountain, both directions; 5. stop signs at Silver Lake Trail and Near Mountain, both directions. Name Address ~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~~m~~k~~~:~~Q~~lu :t~_f~~___6_0/(2_c~~&-~~Pl~ ~fft:ZL}-~- ~L~.Q:'b- 1.11 LC_ fi~~~ k-::L - c!L - 2.0J?f~CZ d J:.U 4 '/ 11'.1/)'1.1 J/Y!.,/:;;2' 1.055' ;: /" . -I-,tUi). Y .4f",,~()joc<l /n;v - - - -.- - ~~ _J-!i: ~ - - - - - - - ~- -~:::; -tz;tu:l {!~-;- - ~C~T -J-;;;; ~7~ ~_~ ______ ___~_________________~__~---~-J-- \ - __~__ _~__1~.;2<J~_~~~..@~~ct~_~0~~ -~--------~--~----~-----~----~~----------~~~--- 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 9 -- --- -- - ------- - -_.- - - - - - - - - - - -.--- - ----... --- - --- --- - - -- - -- - - - -.-._- ---:- -- 10 -----------------------------~---------------~-------------------- 11 ------------------------------------------~----------~----------- 12 - - - -- _._-- - - _... - - - --.-- -;.. - - - --- - - - ....-- - ----:- --- - - -- -.- - - --- -.-- --.--....- ~._- -- - - -.- 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 14 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 15 -----------------------------------~----------------------------- o Z W " W ..... c: c: c:: c: ~_O __0 .g __0 __0 _ '6 '6 :g :g :g ~ ~ <: <: <: 't:l_'t:l;;-= J:_ _z;, -c aiM an 1lII;;: IlIIN ell eIIc: ;;. v, c: U ell c: ~ c: uftj IlII ftj lIt.5 .g'ftj ftl ftj ..!!! _ 0: 'C ~.! --O:'Cc.c: :2 - c: a: c: :2 >-:2 >-0 c.:2 _:2 >-0 eII,g .!!::!E >-0 :2o.!!::!EcoO:;.5... ell"" C:::!Ec: -"':'::ftl coO:; iii...-...:.::ftluCIJ -... C1Jftl~: UClI::!EZ ~::: J:ClI::!EZ::!EZ ::!Ez uz 10 "'+., li 01. ;,; Bi j~ 'as ~at &~ ~i :~; ~~ 51. i~: ~&:l it! oj i~ 'i~i h -f ..... &t ~, =;. ~i:; !~i ii;~ :ij ii H t~i &s..; !Oi i::~ iJi; : 0 : _, .,,;. :i i~ !jl~ !l 6~ ;i~! A= l~ !'!O'i " ~& 'Hi Ji. 5~~ ii:~ !. !~i 1::i z I., ~!6 i:Gos cC ij ~i: &~lt ..J ,. 1-. u~. 0. ~~ h~ :.:1; o Ij .!~i ~::' w t, '''. 5,'Q > '.. ~-, ".li o ~. 'it hu a: e~ e~. D.: 0. i <: . >- lXl 't:l ClI C. o G:i > . ClIIIl oe 't:l1Xl ~'~ ...Cl eII'1::l J:C: 3.3 D D . 't:l ell III o C. o D:. ClI ;; :i l&. ~~ ~ 'Y , i co co .... 0) ~ o en \.l.l Z, tE == z w en en <: :I: z <: :I: u oa o o o 3: w a: o :I: en z - ~ Z :J > 0 t: cr z :E ;j == ::e 0 u a: 0 w <( Z Z 00( W ..... 0. Z 00( ".....~ r~ !\\ 'J ') /' ~ c. v' \/ / '-.. 0 -S) x () , 5- c' ......:--"'" L- a ~, r -, .~ ') ..; \'1 "() - '-' -f- 0 I 1 - - !.-t ..) cI -- '" f.; -::> C' 0 _C CJ ' 6 ,()_C v "d ~ //0 V If'! \ - \ - C S <::) '0" ~ ::> <) -c: '- <:"'1 >.:1/ r ,-- Cl .- '- -0 ,) ~ <;- 0 -- -... ....., <::'. - .- '~ - '-- . ) ( \ ,.... -.,'.....' \ . :)0 /~ ---.. '''-..'' \ \ \ \ \ "-.- .,----- ~~ .-.... \~~ / l /' -..... " \ - " . \- U f \. ,j \ / "- / /'./ "'----"~. I ---..... .~., .:J \. '\ ,- .::J U \'1 L- V V ~ <:J \'1 '.. r ::) -. - . .. -r r .' 4- .--} ....J ~' I -.:;) ,~ , c; "'0 ' , , , " " "'-'" " ", ''\ \ . \. -(,.' \ '::> \ ......" \ ~ \ , \ -- . 2:.. ". -;: ~ --. I' """'- I f '- ~-- ~. .:; , ,>;:i '. -: . ~"I (:;.. ..' i XBI 'J ) '''' .-r - ... .,::) (_. . 'c::t:: , \ \ \ . ~ ;.-.. ~ u , -, \ ~j ;~J \ -'- i (.J \ \ \ ..---..../. ';.~ ~ '~ ,1 , . ~ ~ -+ '.') \j q C ro. W '), '- cJ~ r '_ :t. r ... -~ .v C ~ :5 < c) (- ~ -, ~D -- \~ "j -,- rv '- I') -:;J ,~,-) <.. V} '..") <:' -- , \ '-' ;- ',J ...) .'" "-- ,.) f -~ ';') ~ c , - " "" .j, "') .... 1J Q ('J ..~ T- ed ,... '-' \.. ""'--"'" Qj .' '.' "" Ii r I::J '::- G " ,.- . '-- ol -' S- '- . I , . , - .,.-- -", :"-' / \ .;\J '-' i.- ""' -' \..; ':J Qj .r, .... \"l .J - s , L:) '.J .- u v r ol,~ "- ") ..- -- ~ (, , c ~ (' G =< C .--> 0 ~ r !>- '- "-~ Lt- c i.J - ....... + .,., ..~ ~ - ~ " ') \1 , ;; ':i .:: - .-'- L-.. --- I .<.' ~ -- (;) l.; '- '" , <:)) '- -.. ~ ~ :J - <:...J ~ (C- ~x. SOUTH LAKE ~TONKA PUBUC S~ DEPAR~'~t~v, 810 Excelsior Boulevard -......... Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 RICHARD A. YOUNG Chief of Police (612) 474-3261 MEMOBA!f.QYM APR 2 0 1990 To: Larry Chief Whitaker You;W 19, 199'1J From: Date: April Subject: Near Mountain Petition I have received a copy of the petition requesting certain traffic regulation signs to be installed on Near Mountain Boulevard. You have asked for my comments. While there are five items listed in the petition, .tt really relates to two actions; a speed limit change and the installation of stop signs at various locations. I would recommend that the request for a speed limit change be sent to the State of Minnesota for their study process. As you know, if they agree, the city can lower the speed limit. If they disagree, the city can not lower the speed limit. I do see one major problem with such a request. It does not seem to make much sense to have dead end streets which intersect with Near Mountain Boulevard having an allowed speed limit of 30 MPH and then having Near Mountain Boulevard, a collector type street for that area, having a reduced speed limit of 25 MPH. Normally such a road would have a higher speed limit than those roads entering it. The stop sign requests must be considered' in relation to the Uniform Manual on Traffic Control Devices. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota has adopted this manual and given it the force of law. I have included a copy of the section dealing with the placement of stop signs. There are four warrants for a stop sign placement. The first three certainly do not apply to Near Mountain Boulevard. Number four may apply if ~T~. three conditions exist. There must be high speed. This is a comparative judgement based upon the other factors in the location. This requirement might be met. There must be restricted view. This requirement might also be met at some of the locations. Lastly, there must be a serious accident record. This requirement is not met. Since January 1, 1987, this department has made accident reports on 966 accidents in our jurisdiction. There has not been one accident report filed on Near Mountain Boulevard. Another item in the Uniform Manual on Traffic Control Devices states, "STOP signs should not be used for speed control". Even if this is not a reason for this request, I believe another person looking at the proposed stop sign location request would see how Serving SoUlh Loke Minnelonka Comtrumilies of Excelsior, Greenwood, Shorewood and Tonka Bay the locations are tIlced equally along the roatltnd would certainly affect speed by their placement. Secondly, the petition refers several times to speed, possibly indicating to another person that this may be the reason for the request. Lastly, should the City Council approve these stop signs, without meeting the warrants as set forth in the Uniform Manual on Traffic Control Devices, other neighborhoods, some of whom have previously been denied stop signs, would also be requesting stop signs in their neighborhoods which may not meet the warrants. Should the City Council consider the placement of the stop signs as requested, I would suggest the City Attorney render an opinion as to any possible liability the city may assume by placing the stop signs without meeting the warrants as specified and adopted by the State of Minnesota. The City Attorney should also consider what effect this would have on prosecutions for violations of the stop signs which do not meet the warrants. I would be .happy to discuss these and other considerations concerning this request with yourself or the City Council at any time. , -- 2D-! Stop Sign (RI-I) STOP signs are intended fOl' use on roadways where traflic is required to stop. Tho STOP sign shall bo an octagon with white message and bor- der on II. red background. The standard size shall be 30 inches by 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size is recammended. On law-valume local streets and secondary roads with low appraach speeds, a. 24-inch by 24-inch size may be used. At l\. multiway stap intersectian (sec. 2B-6), a. supplementary plate (RI-3) shauld be mounted just below each STOP sign. If the number of approach legs ta the intersectian is three or more, the numeral an the supplementary plate shall carrespond to the actual number .of legs, .or the legend ALL- WAY (RI-4) may be used. The supplementary plate shall have whjte letters an a red background and shnll ha\'e a. standard size of 12 inches by 6 inches (RI-3) or 18 inches by 6 inches .(RI-4). A STOP sign beacan .or heacans may be used in canjunctian with a. STOP sign as described in sectian 4E--4. Secandary messages shall nat be used an STOP sign faces. 2B-5 Warrants for StOll Sign Because the STOP sign causes a substantial incanvenience ta motarists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the fol- lowing conditions exist: 1. Intersectian of a less important raad with a. main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersecti.on in a signalized area. 4. Other intersections where n. combination .of high speed, re- stricted view, and serious accident. record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. STOP signs shauld never be used on the through roadways of expressways. Properly designed expressway interchanges provide for tho continuous flow of traffic, making STOP signs unnecessary even an the entering roadways. 'Where at-grade intersections are temporarily justified for local traffic in sparsely populated areas, STOP signs should be used on the entering roadwn.ys to protect. the through trafiic. STOP signs may also be required at the end .of diverging roadways at the intersection with other highways not designed as expressways. Ill. most. of these cases, t.he speeds will not. warrant. any great increase in the sign sizes. 2B-4 32 tr(t {; ct flJ(t STOP signs shall not be erected nt intersections where traffic control signals are operating. The conllicling commands of tw..o types .of control devices are confusing. If tra/lic is required ta stop when t.he operation of the stop-and-go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation with the red flashirig light facing the traffic that must stop. Where two main highways intersect, the STOP sign or signs should normally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow .of traffic. Traffic engineering studies, however, may justify n. deci- sion ta install n. STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at n. three-way intersection where safety considerations may justify stop- ping the grenter flow of traffic to permit a left-turning movement. For other than emergency purposes portable or part-time STOP .. signs shall not be used. STOP signs should not. be used for speed control. . 2B-6 Multiway Stop Signs The "Uultiway Stop" installation is useful as ll. safety measure at some locations. It. should ordinarily ue used only where t.he volume of trafiic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. A trafl1c control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a. heavy volume of traffic. Any of the following conditions may warrant a. multi way STOP sign installation (sec. 2B-4) : 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control trafl1c while arrangements are beinlT made for the si!:!1lal . b b mstallation. 2. An accident problem, as indicated by {h'c or more reported ~ccident~ of. ll. type susceptible of correction by n. multi way stop mstallatlOn ln a 12-mont11 .pel"iod. Such accidents include 1'.- and left-turn collisions as ,,'ell as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum trafl1c volumes: (a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least. 500 \"Chicles pel' hOUl' for any 8 hours of an average day, and (b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian vohllne [l'om the minor street 01' highway must a\'erage at least 200 units pel' hour for the same 8 hours, with an In-erage delay to minor street ve- hicular traffic of at. least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maxi- mum hour, but (c) 'When the 85-percentile approach speed of the major street trafiic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum \'ehicular volume warrant is 70 percent. of the abO\'e requirements. 33 2B-G .. '"-,,, ........... '-' MAY 10 '90 11:01 OSM ~MN ,-,' . o P.2 ClSM Orr .' .:.. SChe1en . . '.:. MaYeJ?n & . ASsOdates, me. 2021 East Hennepin Avenue Mmneapolis. MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Surveyors Planners MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: James P. Norton and Don Icrazil DATE: August 22. 1989 SUBJECT: Elevated,Tower Overflow Pipe Receiving Catch Basin Manhole As discussed at the Council Meeting August 14t 1989 to prevent further erosion from an inadvertant overflow of the elevated tower a large receiving catch basin manhole should be constructed. Mr. Don Zdrazilt Director of Public Works, has indicated the work can be done' by the Public Works Department. Following is a breakdown of costs to construct a catch basin manhole. ITEM . ....- ..----- ....,.- Ur ~JJ. ~ ,~ COST 1 - 4' Diameter Manhole (8' Approx. Depth) 1 - Median Drain Frame & Grate $ 2,000.00 200.00 1 - Concrete Encasement of Frame with Curbed Sides 100 feet of 12" P.v..C. 15 Cubic Yards Rip/Rap *Final Grading & Turf Establishment Contingency T~s e. Co s+s hAV~ 500.00 2,000.00 500.00 2,000.00 800.00 b-e e N '(' e....c .s Q cA. b ~ Y'V\ ~. 00'" ~d..t' 0. 'i. i l Q.Ncl w;lI b(l. p re.s e. .."d- ed. (1. t + M. C.OUN C : ~ ~ ~ Q"t ,. N j ~1"-tJI9qa l COST ESTIMATE...................... S 8.000.00 I 1 * This cost item is the responsibility of C.B.I. I I JPN/cmw I 08/89-69 j 1}'iJp. /~ a-S :.. I MAY 10 '90 11:01 OSM .'MN (~ ~ I I ! . P.3 OSM On' Scheltn Mayeron& . -...,1Ill:. '-" 2021 EaSt Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-331-8660 FAX 331-3806 Engineers Surveyors Planner.> August 8, 1989 '-'" City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Attn: Mr. Larry Whittaker Administrator Re: S.E. Area Elevated Tower Project No. 86-1D aSM Comm. No. 3707.40 Dear Mr. Whittaker: At the Work Study Meeting Monday night August 7. 19S9t it was noted.that the tower overflowed again. This was discussed with a certain amount of frustration on everone's part. To understand why the tower overflows and why there is damage done each time it occurs requires a review of the history of the Waterford Projects. BACK6ROUNDi. The Waterford area was intended to be served with water fo 11 owi ng the completion of 5 basic projects. They are as follows: PRO~ECT N06 COM"l N06 DESCgIPTION L 86 -lA 3707.00 S.E. Area Trunk Water Main 2. 86-18 3707.10 S.E. Area Deep Well 3. a6-Ie 3707.50 S.E. Area Pumphouse 4. 86-10 3707.40 S.E. Area Elevated Tower 5. a6-IE 3707.60 S.E. Area Trunk Water Main The fi rst two major projects to be completed was the fi rst Trunk Water Main Project and the deep well. Initially, the Waterford area was served with water from the City of Minnetonka which required the trunk water main. An agreement was set up where Shorewood would be served with water for four years or when 90 units were served which ever occurred first. Development in the Waterford, Covington-Vine Ridge area occurred much faster than anticipated. While the deep well was finished by the end of 1986 it was not intended to take over the duties of supplying water until the pumphouse and elevated tower were complete. However, in the summer of 1987 it became apparent that 90 units would be served with water much sooner than anticipated. The decision was made to put the well into ~' production with the use of a temporary pressure system utilizing a hydro- E\j~1 OPPOrtUIlUY Employc:r MAY 10 '90 11: 02 OSM M. MN . P.4 '-' City of Shorewood August 8, 1989 Page 2 '-" . pneumatic tank housed in a temporary building. This work was completed during the winter of '87 - 8S. It was put into operation early in 1988, around mid February. The connecting valve to the Minnetonka System was closed. The temporary pumping system supplied water to all of the new developing homes throughout the summer of 1988. The weather was ext~emely hot and there was little rainfall. Consequently, the pump ~an nearly constantly. However, the run cycle required starting and stopping the system every 3 minutest This put a tremendous strain on the system, especially the pump, motor and electric operated check valve. Under normal operations the well pump may start and stop 4 to 5 times a day. Here it was starting and stopping 200-300 times per dayl The piece of equipment that took the most abuse was the electric operated check valve. The elevated tower was finally finished and put into operation in the fall of '88, however, the damage had been done. Some of the system components had experi enced years of operat 1 on duri ng that one sunvner. A 1 though, it did what it was asked to do and no one ever went wi thout water. Since the elevated tower was put on 1 ine it has overflowed 3 times when erosion damage has occurred. The tower overflows when the electric-operated check valve malfunctions and the pump is allowed to keep running past the high water mark in the tower. When this happens the tower overflows. Al so a high water al arm goes off and the Auto- Dialer notifies Munitech of a malfunction. Munitech has done their best to keep the valve operating properly, however the valve has experienced the life expectancy on some of the parts already. This valve requires a major overhaul or possible replacement. The result of the abuse it withstood during the summer of '886 This is the reason why the tower overflows. Now, why is there damage done when it overflows? OVERFLOW OW~ When the tower was finished the Contractor, CSI Na-Con, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge and Iron did not install the overflow pipe according to the plans. Instead, they installed it so it discharged water nearly parallel to the ground. When the tower first overflQwed the water over shot the splash block and began eroding the bank 20 - 301 from the tower. A significant gulley developed. Publ ic Works filled the gulley in, but the damage had been done. Whatever turf growth and ground cover was available was totally washed away. The sand backfill material provided no natural deterrant to any subsequent overfl ows. The tower overflowed one DlOre time before eSI came out and put an elbow on the discharge to direct the flow to the splash block. Recently the tower overflowed aga in. The splash block d is s i pa ted the energy but wi thout any grass cover or turf growth the hill washed away again. Possibly, even with the grass cover some erosion may have occurred. As a result, after inspecting the area with the Director of Public Works, Mr. Don Zdrazil, we feel the only way to prevent this from occcurring again is to construct a large receiving catch basin manhole. Pipe from the manhole ~. will be laid to the bottom of the hill with a flared end section and rip- I . ). '-" '-" "-" MAY 10 '90 11:03 OSM MPLS,MN P.5 . . City of Shorewood August 8, 1989 Page 3 rap installed. This will dissipate the energy of the overflowing water and co.nduct it properly to a day light discharge at the bottom of the hill. If the Public Works Department does the work, as Don has mentioned, the cost could be $8,000 to $10,000. Irecomend that the staff be directed to come back with a permanent solution and an updated cost estimate to do the work thats required. - If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully, ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. .J--P.1~ James P. Norton; P.E. City Engineer/Project Manager JPN/c. 08/89-68 cc: Mr. Don Zdrazil, City of Shorewood Mr. Phil Tipka, Resident Inspector , '" BOARD MEMBERS David H. Cochran, Chair GreenwoOd Albert O. Fosler, Vice Chair Deephaven .Jan Boswinkel, Secretary Minnelonka Beach .John Lewman. Treasurer Minnetrista Douglas E. Babcock Spring Park Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay .James N. Grathwol Excelsior .JoEllen L. Hurr Orono .John G. Malinka Victoria Thomas Martinson Wayzala Robert K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Thomas W. Reese Mound Robert E. Slocum Woodland . . APR I I 1990 ((> tJ\ 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE D!RECTOR April 10, 1990 City of Shorewood c/o Laurence Whittaker, Adm. 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood,}lli 55331 Dear Larry: .The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has received an application for a Multiple Dock and Mooring Area License as described on the attached certificate. LMCD ordinances require that before a license can be issued, the affected property meet municipal zoning requirements. Therefore, it is the policy of the LMCD that all dock license applications be referred to the village for review, and that a zoning certificate be required from the village before final action of the District on the application. If a zoning certificate or a request for delay for reason is not received from the village within 45 days of the above date, the District will continue its cons~deration for approval of the application. Please execute the enclosed certificate and return it to this office so that prompt action can be taken on the application. Thank you! Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Enc. Minnetonka Portable Dredging 12.(;. I . . . HUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION FOR DOCK LICENSE ZONING APPROVAL FOR 1990 (year) Under the terms of Lake Hinnetonka Conservation District (LHCD) Code: Section I.06,Subd.ll Compliance With Other Laws. The issuance of a license or permit by the district does not relieve any person from the responsibility of obtaining required .licenses, permits, or other perloission from any federal, state, municipal, county or other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Lake. LMCD hereby advises its member municipality that the following person/ firm/organization has applied for a new/renewal license for multiple docka~ Minnetonka Portable Dredging Co. c/o William C. Niccum, Pres., 500 West Lake St. Excelsior (Name and address of dock applicant) Same (Title, description and location of docks) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I certify that the above dock license applicant has met the zoning ordinance requirements of Shorewood for the (Hunicipality) property described for 1990 and is entitled to a Lake Minnetonka (Year) Conservation District dock and/or mooring area license thereunder for slips and/or moorings. (Authorized Signature) .. (lJate) ....-. ..... ~ . ~ ~ ~ ......::.. .. 1. ..., ~ cs t , ..s:r t. '..,..a. ,. ~ {) t":' ~ Ii) 'j ~~ Cl ~i ~ ._-....r.:.:- <:) \/" " ~ . 1- ~ ~ i~ '.:::: () (~ ;..:\ :;; ~ ~ _..-iJ ....~ U ~.~~ " '... \l t. ~ ~ ....0 V 4. ~ ~r.::. <::l " 1)' .l" ..... (': ~ t.. ~ () v. - ~ ~ ~ u ~.Q ';' -0 " ~ ~ ~ ~ ::f ~, 1.1 3 U ''"'0 -Q - ~ "'::l. ~ <:) '\l~ .~ ,.. ,=J ("\ <i-, r-. ~..".. \J ..' ) r) t-:: . J J",,~. ....... ~_ Ci . j \1 ') . a. -a~ \ .> ;~j ~~ '- ~ ,tl -. 1::l, " . . " ., '" '. '" ~ , (]'.' ;~- - ),.. ~ ..s: ~ !. " i ~ \ " ~L, I . "" .. \ . I ',. -...\1 -.-,- - ~ , " I' . . . - ,~ ~i. r:l:l:/ L t;r' .. ..;:~ .. - rJ " " ~ ~~ I \ I I J ! . , . t J I '. ~ -- .. e: I I I _-'" .... .' "dul( !z.~ ~ ,- (~r 1-V' D...lvt. ~I' 1> . ' ~J ~I ~ : I ' Needs 'as-built . -. ; 'survey.... 1 ,I 8",:26:87 r ,~.': "; . .! . 1 .' , . i ! .: .J. \J , ~.". ~ ~ \~ \ ~ I:~ \) II) '--" Vl I \~ I ,\, \~ ~ ~ '>/ '\' ~ .~ ~ l ,,' ~ " \l I^ ~ \\~ \I, .\ ~_{ '1 . ~ ~ \J:~.\J .~ :~' ~ ~~~ } fy /-3r> I 4'''. \ ~ I f 1') -3 0 I ;1''1-3D ",.r-3b 1ft. -II> /fJ'7 - J 10 ! I d5~~:::;:r;:' ...1., . 'I~~_ IS-: .- ~..... . . i ., r "'1\ . _..~. R". I ' J' .. "-9 ~ .. '. ~::!:. -::.......;. .t. . . . ' .' '-" 0'/ - L I(.) - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tJ \n) r ~ fI'l ') !:... .. or: {....... . -0 .Y ~~t ~ -.J , ( \..t '" ~J ...... ~ ~ ~ ::to ... :::: 'c{ q: - h .- - ~~ ~ - ! .....-' -'"1'. ---'--'RffiJ I i'f I ;:! I 11 II ;,' I ~ r j', L!I/'! . .\/ '/'11' .\ , '.J I J' ,. Jl .' I ; I, I r. . I , I J I f i j ; ; ; : ' I,! ': I II _w. <t3 ij.-t~ .-LL~.L1..l..Lti. l-l.1.CL, __.1.__6d I ! k(--. ..', ............... .-._........ ,,- -...._..~.. .-' .......__.-.. , .,. --.. .... -.....-.. "1 --...-......- ...-.....- ...... ,-." . .._........~. ..... , Iffl , Ii f(- I '1 "':s r! il rl. !..lt~ ~ :~:.J,.l " ,'\ . q ~ r:r nl1 . ,ll"i:"llll II l\I \.,\. II I :~:; 1111 Iii II llh I, l\tfJ; III I !I ! ij Iii I ' , , vi . '. -m ii I " .-~=~ - ,t: -r-~lb:-"'''='.7...=._:;F~, rii~ .- ~.t [f'i:;;:';fr~lft:;::;;[P:~-;~UJ.;,;;;; tf:'; c' . .:-ll~~t.t?f J;r"=r'3- (\(\ n 11 ; II !It ; I I !t '; I '111 if 1l ilJ 9/..t (t fll :, III I II \ : iI -1-./ OS! . I I i 11 ; I , : ~! i t · ~ 'I; ~ ; .! ~ ~:. i I , . . '- ...- -"'-1" . :.:.:.-t-.. ! :i ~ ~ l t --.~'-r Jl (] I! \1 :n .' I ' I /0 ! \ ~ ; . , .' I I t. i.l; III : 'i j I l -I. \ r....,.'......!.r ~! -: I ------T.,J .f . . '~. . '" '. BOA~O MEMBE~S David H. Cochran. Chair Greenwood Albert O. Foster, Vice Chair Deep haven Jan Boswinkel. Secretary Minnetonka Beach John Lewman, Treasurer Minnetrista Douglas E. Babcock Spring Park Marvin Sjorlin Tonka Bay James N. Grathwol Excelsior JoEllen L. Hurr Orono John G. Malinka Victoria Thomas Martinson Wayzata Robert K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Thomas W, Reese Mound Robert E. Slocum Woodland . ~r ,.J~ <-C - ~' '" MAY - ..., Iccn . LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 May 4, 1990 EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR City of Shorewood c/o Laurence Whittaker, Adm. 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Dear Larry: .The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has received an application for a Multiple Dock and Mooring Area . License as described on the attached certificate, LMCD ordinances require that before a license can be issued, the affected property meet municipal zoning requirements. Therefore, it is the policy of the LMCD that all dock license applications be referred to the village for review, and that a zoning certificate be required from the village before final action of the District on the application. If a zoning certificate or a request for delay for reason is not received from the village within 45 days of the above date, the District will continue its consideration for approval of the application. Please execute the enclosed certificate and return it to this office so that prompt action can be taken on the application. Thank you! Sincerely, ONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Enc. Adeline D. Johnston ---~,#.. ~ ad--~ , , 2. e. 2. ~ . . ~ MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION FOR DOCK LICENSE ZONING APPROVAL FOR 1990 (year) Under the terms of Lake Minnetonka C9nservation District (LMCD)Code: Sectionl.06,Subd.ll Compliance With Other Laws. The issuance of a license or permit by the district does not relieve any person from the responsibility of obtaining required licenses, permits, or other permission from any federal, state, municipal, county or other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Lake. LMCD hereby advises its member municipality that the following person/ firm/organization has applied for a new/renewal license for multiple dockage: Adeline D. Johnston, 5465 Howards Point Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 (Name and address of dock applicant) Same (Title, description and location of docks) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I certify that the above dock license applicant has met the zoning ordinance requirements of Shorewood for the (Municipality) property described for 1990 and is entitled to a Lake Minnetonka (Year) Conservation District dock and/or mooring area license thereunder for slips and/or moorings. (Authorized Signature) (Date) G ~ -- ~ \ - - -- =- ~ r-~----, .- \ \q - - it ~O~ ~~-- '~/.~;"-'. Ib"~l' : \ -:J- .- . .'*t . J :'t" .sCIt~Y,,,d-o" CiRG!) ''I.'1? ':'" ,:" .. 'CD ;;: H. "'" L I ;" '" @ ":' y /-I b "".. @. " " -.,~ 'It" '" *'~S ..s'~ T i3~el<' A-"R €:-67 _@.::> Poc.K \AS c;. A~~A (k) . J:>oe....k. ~TR..\ATu.Rcc- a-. t ";) i",^ S LL.-I 10 US(;:-JJ -~o (j)' rnl\5. 1+:06.1.;1\1& :);.!-tNs.,oN (f) SOL.{Ih ,^~GR /-A-I<<: @. it; 6- (lj) _..-----5 ~ -r . p... A-e 1Tff.e-c.TG-J:> rV~!~~l$o~s 6:y - -.-.---- (fJ ..-' _---.-- ---- "-'! 111 - (., r> ,q7y-iDO It; 7'1 - k 0 "y. -(," IIf ~J - .,!_O lfr~ - ~D i11"3 - 'J! If ~ - !I'D Iftr1~ ,> I~ k ~ -+/.; (, f) ~tI~ l. p t 'l'f'''' 0 '~- J)) G) :f..' -- I I' t<) /6'1 l::{ :;.' ~ 16'1 i:\ -. U. lJ5~' I 1- -r :?, . .j --- :._ L- - _ ...'. ..,. L__ ",,' . SI' './.; * ~ ~ \ 1t:- ,. ..- -- \ i ! I \: . -i~' --~-_.-_.- ~ I t ..sf-I .B~c k 9 CC-)...I ;\" E- i.:., ,* I~ I-. -;-r C' 1'\1 .j~'~'- )folut+R"b~ Pj; r?c{, ..s f/-cRG- /"u C~~ ..... tn,'N tV, ~~1 s',lG (i.J . t i KE:HoG:',: \ /;tl~~~; , ",,'.h'oc I@ ~ he o . f))fJIN _ my Ho' /6-0 ' rt-B & ~ IJ ~ L~ -r. '\./ 17'0" "'" <lo' ! V" /' F /,. fY\ It lJ J:::l Eo- /7 /'~. ~",-"t,)...7 A(7@ -- .. MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 10 MAY 1990 RE: SIGNAGE REQUEST - BAYSWATER AND GARDEN ROADS FILE NO.: 405 (S~REETS) Staff is in agreement with the attached request. Due to past questions relative to r.o.W. maintenance, the City Attorney advises that the City order and install the signs. On a similar note, two of the four safe-hit barriers on the emergency access have disappeared. It i~., '., ',.n_.ded that the Public Works Department maintain a small supply of them lie. g. six;' for replacement purposes. , """'~"'""''-"-e'-'' If you have any questions relative to this matter, please contact me prior to Monday night's (meeting.' BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Jim Norton D.J. Berkley A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 'l.t>.3. . . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 501 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO GENERAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 501.01, Subd. 1, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1. Offensive, Unhealthy Substances Prohibited: No owner, agent or occupant of any privately owned lands or premises shall place upon or permit upon his premises any abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment such as nonoperative vehicles of all kinds, [1] motor vehicles not displaying a current state license, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, freezers, lumber, trash, debris, junk containers, machinery, implements, equipment which is no longer safely usable for the purpose for which they were manufactured, noxious weeds as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.171, fallen trees, fallen tree limbs, dead trees, dead tree limbs, garbage (except in authorized containers), ashes, yard cleanings or any other foul or unhealthy material. Compostinq of leaves, qrass clippinqs, and easily biodeqradable, nonpoisonous qarbaqe may be permitted, however, as provided in Section 507.02, Subd. 3, of this Code." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, this 14th day of May, 1990. Jan Haugen, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator/Clerk /c2 L / . . rc(Q)~Y CITY OF SHOREWOOD OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 223 On March 19, 1990, the Shorewood city Council adopted Ordinance No. 223 entitled: An Ordinance Amending Title 1000 of the Shorewood City Code Adopting A Rental Housing Code. The Shorewood City Council hereby adopts this 0 fficial Summary of the 0 rdinance. Sharing the concerns of a growing number of Minnesota communities, Shorewood has adopted a rental housing code. T he intent of the new regulations is to correct and prevent housing conditions that may adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of Shorewood's rental population. The code is also intended to improve and maintain the quality of Shorewood's housing stock. The new code establishes a procedure for the licensing of rental dw~lling units, imposes minimum standards relative to health and safety, provides for a system of inspections, and establishes procedures for administering and enforcing the code. Anyone operating a rental dwelling unit must obtain a license to do so. This requirement applies not only to apartments, duplexes and double bungalows, but also extends to single-family homes, or parts thereof (e. g. accessory apartments). The cost of obtaining a license is $35 per unit. Licenses must be renewed annually or upon change of ownership, whichever occurs first. The new code requires that rental dwelling units comply with certain minimum health and safety requirements. Standards for plumbing, wiring and heating have been adopted by reference from the Uniform Housing Code. Property maintenance is also addressed in the regulations. In order to obtain a license, owners of rental units will be required to have their properties inspected. T he code provides for an initial inspection to ensure compliance with the aforementioned minimum s,~ndards. T hereafter inspections will be made every t~ years or when changes in ownership occur. Inspections will also be made on a complaint basis. T he last section of the code establishes deadlines for compliance, a::d an appeal process. Penalties for violating the code are also prescribed. 12-.G.l-. .I . . A copy of the new code is being mailed to all known owners of rental property. Copies of the code are also available for review or purchase at the Shorewood City Hall. The Rental Housing Code goes into effect as of 1 ~0q L'1 1990. A complete text of the Rental Housing Code, Ordinance No. 223, is available for review in the City offices located at 5755 Country Club Road during regular office hours. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood this 14th day of May, 1990. Jan Haugen, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator/Clerk . . t(Q)lP1f ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 502.04 OF THE SHOREWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC NUISANCES WITHIN HARBOR LIMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 502.04, Subd. 2 m., is hereby amended to read as follows: m. Using the public water access site on Christmas Lake in the City, to put into or remove from Christmas Lake any boat or motor in excess of twenty five (25) horsepower, or transporting any boat or motor in excess of twenty five (25) horsepower across said access site. This re;:;triction shall not apply to governmental employees or agents on official business. T he provisions of this paragraph shall expire at twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight on December 31, 1992. (Amd. 1987 Code). Section 2. This 0 rdinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, on this day of , 1990. Jan Haugen, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator/Clerk 12.. C. 3. . . ~ MEMORANDUM . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCIL Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Wanen CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN D~TE: 10 MAY 1990 RE: TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY - SMITHTOWN ROAD FILE NO.: 405 (GENERAL) As you recall the city recently agreed for the County to release the tax-forfeited property located at approximately 26620 Smith town Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached) for public land auction. As explained in a letter (Exhibit B, attached) dated 10 May 1990, from Tom Berge, the Minnetonka School District is interested in acquiring the site for possible future school expansion. It is necessary for the City to adopt a resolution to forward to the County requesting that the subject site be removed from the "auction block". The School District attorney has prepared a draft resolution to that effect (see Exhibit C). As can be seen on Exhibit A, there is a question as to what the School District believes they own and the County half section map shows they own. Mr. Berge is working to resolve this discrepancy. In the meantime it is recommended that the City forward the necessary resolution to Hennepin County. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Tom Berge A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 12.. . O. - J . , \ ~ ... I on ; .. . .: .1\, '-~ tt=')")',' ~ - . ._~u'~__..._>'~_i:'_~~.~_;n...____.J ~~ II '\ " ,'\ \,,) ~- .:. .,. ~ . 2 .....~...~..-................. !~ = ',' ~:& .:.. "'; .'! J '<I J'~~ ,', ..... / ~ . P ....(1 ('O, .::: ~;::; ..;::; -~ Z~ ~. ;, .. J ,~ I. .. '.. _c " ~ '. .::........., - ....~/ "') I;) I " , ,H.--- ----- n_ ---(Hl-' -iN3tlfFI-- iNVCl9 -7' - ----~,-~ !! -.\', I'l ~ "" ~3 - ~ :,~:~ .,., -..0 &II -C .... "" ,,'ai'" , . . , , , '"' ~ ~ ~ f:: .. \ 0, I l -(>. i~" :s o i... +.._..Ill.._...:......~ !! ~- l.-Jn------------l'~ ~:- .: Ie ...~~ ~ ~B~ " ll'6ll H'''''' \ = ~ " ~ Ul ......J......, ~ Z ,:.;, ~ l"1i @ : t..-,~'9ll <it ; "1 _ ~ ':]-. ,.,~ !;-~ ~~~ K~ "'... to ~., ''q. IF- 0- , 0 ~~ ~ :::- ."1 ..' Jo"';:;,..,... 7 f:, ~ ;...s; , < oJ ..; :s..[)iS I N- ..,.. I ~ I 1 ~ ----'1 ~ .tt ~.." ; ;, , ~ '-:\ ~ -: --.\ ,) I~.. t-- -) . . -- t 1>0 ;:, ~e :: = in III;lOl ~ . , , , : :0 , , , \' 0; c : I ~ , r---- ----~- -~- :-------. 1:3 ,~ - :- ~ ...---.----,...------... , , , . , . , . , . , , : I II,' :~ ~" \; .,.:i i -I: (.,: : '4.i \i): I., , i' II r , , I'l " I , , I , , I I: : ...9 ~ I , , ., i , .. ~ {t ";ll .' "-'iiY.ei~ ~ l\ \ ~ , , , , : ~,.) 2 : . : .....J .,"- ! ~l ~'" "'" @O? , , ---~~-- -;. -- - ., (' 0 0; !~;.1 ~ 1 ~:: <2. ,) -:\ ': ,~ ~I L: ~ e ....,J- " 't~ r- 0' .-. -:I- i=- tt \ '\ ',' "i'- '-..!.J :i)- in ',\ \.1.1' lIOl ;;; I\. ,', - ~ ~ ~ -- :.Q'~ ., ~ if! .__u__'n___ ~ ~ I --u---f='---- ~ e 'J1 I 'i ( !-. . . ~ g ........................fji..ait. c ~ ~ C I )', ::. \ ' _ _________________u_ ____~,~..:-----u __00___ _____ _____________ _u__ .:.. sa -;;: l.\. -,', J .' oc .. , "1 ~j tt ::: R HO : I(~ : ~~tl71-t v QOlt ___u__t_u__ ~ = ,(-I ::t" "' .... .. ... ... ~ :e @) ~':-"-.,,!!<~"'.... ~.... ~'" .'i:~:;;,;"...., ""~ ~~ -~ @ . ." ~ , , , \ , , I , .' , I I,i;; ~ ~ ~ Il;;! ... I .... .., -< .... .. u -< ^ ... 05/10/90 h.6A1}..!:lI' . . 09:42 MTKA SCHOOLS 276 ~~~ CITY - SHORE WOOD 'B"612 470 3432 May 10, 1990 To: Brad NielSo(, City Planner Tom Berge I .~,h . \) Y City Council Resolution From; Subjectt Again, thank you for your help in processing this request through the city council. It is important that they act on this resolution at the Hay 14 meeting. You may wish to have your city attorney review this request. Any ~xpenses you incur in our regard will be reimbursed by the District. . Please call with questions. l4J 001 L. ~~ .........*.....*...........+*.+.*.~ FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMC. TO: DEPT: FAX N: FROM: PHONE: CO: FAX #: Pe>at-lt-brand 13~ Ira,'sn\,lIal memQ 7671 ~~bl+ f> NO. OF PAGES if . . May 9, 1990 To: Shorewood City Council From. Tom Berge, Director of Business Services / 6. QfvA Via: Mr. Larry Whi tttaker, City Hanager Subject: Acquisition of Land Adjacent to Hinnewashta Elementary School: Property I.D. #32-117-23-24-0011 The Board of Education for Hinnetonka Schools sincerely appreciates the efforts of the City of Shorewood to assist the district in purchasing from Hennepin County the site in question. The site, 10.44 acres in size, is located immediately west of Hinnewashta Elementary School and is scheduled to be offered for sale at public auction by Hennepin County on Hay 24, 1990. The property is tax forfeited land. We apologize for the urgency of this request but the district only became aware of the property apprOXimately ten days ago. We have been investigating alternate ways to acquire the property other than through. public auction and have been informed that the district can purchase tax forfeited property directly from the county, however, cooperation of the City of Shorewood is required to permit the sa~e to the district. Because the City of Shorewood authorized the property be sold by the county, the county is asking that the city now pass a resolution requesting Hennepin County remove the property from the public auction scheduled for May 24 for the purpose of selling the property to Minnetonka School District. Enrollment continues to grow in the western portion of the school district. During the next fiscal year, the district hopes to receive a positive response from district residents authorizing issuance of bonds to finance additions to elementary schools. Current plans contemplate a 15 room addition-to Minnewashta Elementary School. 11hile no immediate improvements in'the referenced property are planned, acquisition of the property in question would enhance the size of the site for the contemplated addition and would also provide contingency space for future additions. If enrollment growth in the western portion of the district continues, the added property would provide a key portion of the acreage needed to support a middle school. A copy of the suggested resolution is attached. A request has also been submitted to the Hennepin Board of County Commissioners requesting that the property be removed from the auction list contingent upon receipt of the resolution from the City of Shorewood. In order for the district to be able to purchase this property ather than through public auction the cooperation of the Shorewood City Council is needed on Hay 14, 1990. The county has indicated their willingness to cooperate in this request. The district will be purChasing the property for the appraised price of $50,000. Again, thank you for your assistance to the school district. ~"2., . . RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, property located within the City of Shorewood bearing PIO No. 32 117 23 24 0011 is currently on the Hennepin County Property Tax Forfeited Land list and subject to sale by auction on May 24~ 1990: and, WHEREAS, th~ City of Shorewood has received a written request from the Minnetonka Public School District, Independent School District No. 276, to take action necessary to have the subject property removed fr.-om the auction tax forfeit sale list in order that the property can be used f,or a public 'pur.pose by School District No. 276 to wit: an elementa~y public school campus; and, WHEREAS, ~he City of Shorewood does find that there is a public need to use property bearing PIn No. 32 117 23 24 0011, and such need requires that the property be transferr.ed to the City of Shorewood to be used as and for such public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Sho:r:ewood: 1. That the Hennepi.n County Boar.d of Commissioners is requested to remove from the tax forfeited land sale list set for auction sale on May 24, 1990, land bearing PID No. 32 117 23 24 0011, being a parcel approximately 10.44 acres located wi thin the boarders of the City of Shorewood and described as follows: The East 50 feet of the West 478.5 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 117, Range 23, also that part of the East 115 feet of the West 428.5 feet of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 lying North of the South 378.78 feet thereof; also, that pert of the East 264 feet of the West 742.5 feet of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 - 1 - E."ha"t 6 Ub/1U/'dU V'd:qq .0'01:'::' q IV ,:;q,:;:.::. 1111'>.... ';)l.,nVVL';> "-/ 0 ~~- \.-1 I I - ';>lIVI"\.J:.IIVV1.I ,.. UV"'":f . . lying North of the South 330 feet thereof Ex Rd. 2. That the City of Shorewood proposes to use the property for. a pub~ic purpose, to wit: make the property available to Independent School District: No. 276 for enlargement of the public school elementar.y school campus known as Minnewashta Public E~ementary School. 3. That School District No. 276 has made it known to the City of Shorewood that the District stands ready to pay to the State of Minnesota through Hennepin county tax forfeiture office the approved value of the property plus transfer costs in return for receipt of a tax title deed of transfer for the property to Independe~t Public School District No. 276. 4. That a certified copy of this Resolution be tra~smitted forthwith to the Hennepin CQunty Commissioners: upon vote being taken. nays. there were yeas and Passed this day of , 1990. Certification The undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Shorewood, does certify that the above resolution is a true and correct copy of a reso~ution adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood passed at a regular meeting of the said council on the day of 1990, at which a quorum was present and voting. Clerk, City of Shorewood - 2 - C'" Z- CHECK NO. ~. of CHECK APP. LISTING FOR MAY 14s 1990 CO~ MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE APRIL 20 s 1990 4255 4256 4257 4258 4259 4260 4261 4262 4263 4264 4265 4266 4267 4268 4269 4270 4271 4272 4273 4274 4275 4276 4277 4278 4279 4280 4281 4282 4283 4284 4285 4286 4287 4288 4289 4290 4291 4292 4293 4294 4295 4296 4297 4298 4299 4300 (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G&L) (G&L) (G&L) (G&L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR PURCHASES $ CASH REGISTER SALES, INC. PROGRAMMING GRIGGS, COOPER AND COMPANY LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. WINE PURCHASES MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES/MISC. PURCHASES NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES ED PHILLIPS AND SONS LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES POGREBA DISTRIBUTING, INC. BEER PURCHASES QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO. WINE PURCHASES SHOREWOOD MERCHANTS ASSN. ADVERTISING WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE WASTE REMOVAL WEEKLY NEWS, INC. ADVERTISING PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT APRIL 1990 PREMlpMS BRADLEY J. NIELSEN DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE STATE TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS THE BANK EXCELSIOR FEDERAL/FICA/MEDICARE WITHHOLDING ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST lCMA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA PAYkOLL DEDUCTIONS CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT CHILD SUPPORT PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CITY OF MINNETONKA 1ST QUARTER 1990 WATER PURCHASE WIDMER, INC. REISSUE OF CK NUMBER 3288-DATE 11/5/89 U. S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR PURCHASES GRIGGS, COOPER AND COMPANY LIQUOR/WINE/MISC. PURCHASES JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES MINNEGASCO, INC. UTILITIES NATL GUARDIAN SECURITY SERVo QUARTERLY MONITOR CHARGE HARRY NIEMELA MAY RENT-LIQUOR STORE I ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES POGREBA DISTRIBUTING, INC. BEER/MISC. PURCHASES RYAN PROPERTIES, INC. MAY RENT-LIQUOR STORE II QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR/WINE/MISC. PURCHASES U. S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES/ADVERTISING JOHN/JUDITH CROSS & JOHANNA,INC.PUBLIC WORKS SITE OPTION AGREEMENT GROUP HEALTH, INC. MAY EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE MEDCENTERS HEALTH CARE, INC. MAY EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN MAY EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS, INC. MAY EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE MAY EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE MAY EMPLOYEE ACCIDENT & SICKNESS INS. A T & T UTILITIES BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR PURCHASES BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO SUPPLIES/CIGARETTE PURCHASES DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER/MISC. PURCHASES EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER/MISC. PURCHASES (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) - 1 - 1,975.55 15.00 4,928.68 894.83 201. 95 463.18 1,182.72 588.30 128.15 96.88 55.00 141.00 27.00 130.00 91 7 . 84 5,246.31 543.46 1,617.48 165.00 45.00 539.81 256.87 267.83 2,255.37 4,144.60 386.74 16.58 257.52 1,292.00 1,531.26 569.10 1,922.58 1,079.73 225.30 5,000.00 290.67 435.80 3,901.50 381. 04 34.00 114.00 .63 2,113.96 2,416.65 3,378.55 6,063.91 /f CHECK APeAL LISTING FOR MAY 14s 1990 ceIL MEETING CHECK NO. TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE APRIL 20s 1990 CONTINUED 4301 4302 4303 4304 4305 4306 4307 4308 4309 4310 4311 4312 4313 4314 4315 4316 4317 4318 (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (G) (G) (G) (G) FRANCK'S TRUCKING GRIGGS, COOPER AND COMPANY HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS, INC. MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY, INC. NORTH STAR ICE NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. ED PHILLIPS AND SONS POGREBA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. SCHWAAB THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE U. S. POSTMASTER CASH LARRY WHITTAKER LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES LIQUOR/WINE/MISC. PURCHASES QUARTERLY MONITORING CHG. SEC. LIQUOR/WINE PURCHASES BEER/MISC. PURCHASES SUPPLIES/MISC. PURCHASES MISC. PURCHASES UTILITIES WINE PURCHASES BEER/MISC. PURCHASES WINE PURCHASES SUPPLIES BEER/MISC. PURCHASES WASTE REMOVAL POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE METER CASH FOR SPRING CLEANUP-MAY 5TH ADVANCE FOR CONFERENCE EXPENSES LEGISLATIVE WRAPUP SESSIONS- WHITTAKER & ROLEK TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED - 2 - $ 279.60 7,150.77 SYSTEM 75.00 405.96 5,124.30 286.38 220.74 335.44 62.80 2,342.70 442.89 98.30 9,400.45 65.00 750.00 300.00 200.00 50.00 20,773.51 65,056.15 85,829.66 CHECK APpr LISTING FOR MAY 14. 1990 CWIL MEETING CHECK NO. TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 4319 4320 4321 4322 4323 4324 4325 4326 4327 4328 4329 4330 4331 4332 4333 4334 4335 4336 4337 4338 4339 4340 4341 4342 4343 4344 4345 4346 4347 4348 4349 4350 4351 4352 4353 4354 4355 4356 4357 4358 4359 4360 4361 4362 4363 A T & T ACRO MINNESOTA; INC. AIRSIGNAL, INC. ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO., INC. AMERICAN LINEN COMPANY EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOC, INC. BEST REGARDS, FLORAL DESIGN BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. BUSINESS RECORDS CORP. CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. CITY OF CHANHASSEN COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER DEM-CON LANDFILL, INC. HAROLD DIRCKS ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS CITY OF EXCELSIOR FEEDRITE.CONTROLS,. INC. FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS FROBERG & AHERN, P.A. GLOBAL EquiPMENT CO. GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC. GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY HARMON GLASS HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY ICMA LAHASS CORPORATION LANO EQUIPMENT, INC. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. MANN MADE PROD,UCTS H. C. MAYER & SONS MAMA (LABOR RELATIONS ASSOC.) METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL MILLER POWER MINNEGASCO MN DEPT. OF JOBS & TRAINING MN PLAYGROUND, INC. MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS WM. MUELLER & SONS MUNITECH, INC. NATIONAL CITY BANK NAVARRE TRUE VALUE (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) UTILITIES $ FIREPROOF FILE & OFFICE SUPPLIES BEEPER CHARGE PARTS FOR CULVERTS LAUNDRY SERVICES STREET SIGNS FLOWERS FOR JAN HAUGEN CHEMICAL TOILETS FOR PARKS ROCK FOR PARKS AND ROADS MAINT. CONTRACT FOR VOTING MACHINES PUBLISHING MARCH & APRIL ANIMAL CONTROL SERVo WATER COOLER RENTAL DUMPING FEE TAPING OF APRIL MEETINGS CONCRETE 1ST QUARTER 1990 WATER PURCHASES CHEMICALS MARKING PAINT-PUBLIC WORKS APRIL ATTORNEY FEES WARNING LIGHTS GOPHER STATE SERVICES/APRIL 1990 OFFICE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS 3 WINDSHIELDS PRISONER EXPENSE FOR MARCH 1ST 1/2 1990 PROPERTY TAXES ELECTED OFFICIALS HANDBOOK O'RINGS SLOW MOVING VEHICLE EMBLEM LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE FOR 3/15/90-3/14/91 2 U-JOINTS FOR POST HOLE DIGGER HOSE FITTING-PUBLIC WORKS IRON FOR FREEMAN PARK GATE DIESEL FUEL AND REGULAS GAS CONF. ON 1990 STATE COMPo WORTH LEGISLATION (LARRY) SAC CHARGES FOR APRIL PISTON WORK. ON HOIST TRUCK UTILITIES UNEMPLOYMENT - J. MAJERES BELT SEATS PUBLISHING FILL SAND APRIL WATER & SEWER SERVICES FEES ON GO SEWER IMP BOND 12/01/71 SHOP SUPPLIES - 3 - 21. 62 1,440.22 9.00 614.60 433.43 498.69 25.00 290.23 664.96 585.00 69.35 1 , 811. 00 22.50 20.00 100.00 186.68 1,648.76 1,936.88 59.66 6,928.97 148.42 105.00 15.42 434.52 1,061. SO 1 ,460 . 72 63.95 30.00 9.34 1,398.00 18.66 4.00 12.91 1,499.57 50.00 4,158.00 198.00 77.75 37.32 96.35 174.64 7.63 4,938.00 140.60 199.94 CHECK AP. LISTING FOR MAY 14, 1990 CeIL MEETING CHECK NO. TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL CONTINUED 4364 4365 4366 4367 4368 4369 4370 4371 4372 4373 4374 4375 4376 4377 4378 4379 4380 4381 4382 4383 4384 4385 4386 4387 NEENAH FOUNDRY.CO. NORTHERN STATES POWER NORTHERN STATES POWER NORWEST BANKS ORR SCHELEN MAYERON & ASSOC. JOE PAZANDAK PEPSI COLA COMPANY PIKE'S BUILDING MAINTENANCE POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT REYNOLD'S WELDING SUPPLY CO. ALAN ROLEK SLMPSD TESSMAN SEED & CHEMICAL CO. TONKA FORD TONKA PRINTING U. S. WEST ~OMMUNICATIONS VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY WALDOR PUMP WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE WATER PRODUCTS WOODLAKE SANITARY LANDFILL YOUNGSTEDTS, INC. ZACKS, INC. FRAME AND GRATE FOR STREETS $ UTILITIES UTILITIES PAYING AGENT FEES ON MN SEWER S-A 5/1/72 MARCH ENGINEERING FEES GENERAL 3,729.54 DEVELOPMENT 1,915.63 ON-GOING 312.76 HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT & MILEAGE POP MACHINE RENTAL FOR MAY APRIL JANITORIAL SERVICES MARKER LIGHTS REFILL OXYGEN TANK TUITION REIMBURSEMENT MARCH BOOKING FEE & RESERVE DINNER GRASS SEED & FERTILIZER FOR PARKS BRAKE PARTS FOR TRUCK 4 PRINTING OF NEWSLETTER & TIF LETTER UTILITIES ADD ON WITHHOLDING TO SYSTEM FLOATS-WATER DEPT. WASTE REMOVAL RECYCLING SERVICES FOR APRIL FITTINGS, VALVES, HORNS, METERS DUMPING FEE FOR 24860 SMITHTOWN FUEL PURCHASES WEED KILLER TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST -4 - 257.00 1,618.60 1,675.06 200.00 5,957.93 257.19 10.00 220.00 26.52 9.55 170.50 261.79 3,065.00 45.06 858.20 769.35 21.00 244.16 191. 00 3,610.00 1,422.66 538.13 86.30 75.00 55,296.79 141,126.45 . CHECK APP. LISTING FOR MAY 14, 1990 CO. MEETING CHECK NO. TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT PAYROLL REGISTER FOR APRIL 25, 1990 PAYROLL 203994-203995 VOID $ 203996 SANDRA KENNELLY 80 REG HOURS 756.14 203997 SUSAN NICCUM 80 REG HOURS 599.60 203998 ANNE LATTER 80 REG HOURS 529.87 203999 ALAN ROLEK 80 REG HOURS 929.19 204000 WENDY DAVIS 80 REG HOURS 571.61 204001 BRADLEY NIELSEN 80 REG HOURS 836.47 204002 PATRICIA HELGESEN 64 REG HOURS 409.93 204003 VIRGINIA SHITH 80 REG HOURS 585.39 204004 JOSEPH PAZANDAK 80 REG HOURS 814.07 204005 CHARLES DAVIS 80 REG HOURS 431. 47 204006 DENNIS JOHNSON 80 REG HOURS 694.09 204007 DANIEL RANDALL 120 REG HOURS 705.25 204008 HOWARD STARK 82 REG HOURS 576.68 204009 RALPH WEHLE 82 REG HOURS 577.53 204010 DONALD ZDRAZIL 80 REG HOURS 1~004.45 204011 JOSEPH LUGOWSKI 80 REG HOURS 696.48 204012 LAWRENCE NICCUM 80 REG HOURS 546.40 204013 RUSSELL MARRON 32 REG HOURS 153.49 204014 CHRISTQPHER SCHMID 80 REG HOURS 430.05 204015 BRAD HOLT HE 24.50 REG HOURS 125.55 204016 BRIAN JAKEL 48.50 REG HOURS 221.46 204017 MARK KARSTEN 65.50 REG HOURS 290.02 204018 WILLIAM JOSEPHSON 80 REG HOURS 598.00 204019 SUSAN LATTERNER 36 REG HOURS 161. 69 204020 DEAN YOUNG 80 REG HOURS 551.76 204021 SCOTT BARTLETT 32.50 REG HOURS 164.50 204022 KELLY MICHELSON 14.50 REG HOURS 67.91 204023 KEVIN FOSS 10 REG HOURS 51. 25 204024 JOHN FRUTH 30.50 REG HOURS 132.43 204025 NOEL NICHOLS 12 REG HOURS 57.83 204026 CRAIG SCHOLLE 10.50 REG HOURS 48.13 204027 LAURENCE WHITTAKER 80 REG HOURS 1~040.74 TOTAL GENERAL 12~305.36 TOTAL LIQUOR 3~054.07 TOTAL PAYROLL 15~359.43 - 5 - . , CHECK APP. LISTING FOR KAY 14, 1990 CO. MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK NO. PAYROLL REGISTER FOR MAY 9, 1990 PAYROLL 204028 VOID $ 204029 LEONARD WATTEN COUNCIL 147.82 204030 JANICE HAUGEN MAYOR 178.50 204031 BARBARA BRANCEL COUNCIL 147.82 204032 ROBERT GAGNE COUNCIL 150.00 204033 KRISTI STOVER COUNCIL 150.00 204034 LAURENCE WHITTAKER 80 REG HOURS 1,040.74 204035 SANDRA KENNELLY 80 REG HOURS 756.14 204036 SUSAN NICCUM 80 REG HOURS 599.60 204037 ANNE LATTER 80 REG HOURS 529.87 204038 ALAN ROLEK 80 REG HOURS 929.19 204039 WENDY DAVIS 85 REG HOURS - 5 O.T. 619.32 204040 BRADLEY NIELSEN 80 REG HOURS 836.46 204041 PATRICIA NIELSEN 64 REG HOURS 409.93 204042 VIRGINIA SMITH 80 REG HOURS 585.39 204043 JOSEPH PAZANDAK 80 REG HOURS 814.07 204044 CHARLES DAVIS 92.50 REG HOURS - 10.5 O.T. 552.19 204045 DENNIS JOHNSON 80 REG HOURS 676.64 204046 DANIEL RANDALL 80 REG HOURS 684.88 204047 HOWARD ~TARK 90.50 REG HOURS - 10.5 O.T. 666.78 204048 RALPH WEHLE 90.50 REG HOURS - 10.5 O.T. 667.63 204049 DONALD ZDRAZIL 80 REG HOURS 1,004.45 204050 JOSEPH LUGOWSKI 82 REG HOURS 694.95 204051 TODD LATTERNER 56.50 REG HOURS 435.99 204052 LAWRENCE NICCUM 81 REG HOURS - 1 O.T. 556.25 204053 RUSSELL MARRON 38.50 REG HOURS 182.22 204054 CHRISTOPHER SCHMID 80 REG HOURS 430.05 204055 BRAD HOLTHE 32 REG HOURS 163.99 204056 BRIAN JAKEL 28.50 REG HOURS 140.81 204057 MARK KARSTEN 46.50 REG HOURS 213.40 204058 WILLIAM JOSEPHSON 80 REG HOURS 598.00 204059 SUSAN LATTERNER 37 REG HOURS 165.43 204060 DEAN YOUNG 80 REG HOURS 551. 76 204061 SCOTT BARTLETT 42 REG HOURS 205.02 204062 DANIEL HAASKEN 2 REG HOURS 10.25 204063 KELLY MICHELSON 16 REG HOURS 73.96 204064 KEVIN FOSS 5.50 REG HOURS 28.19 204065 JOHN FRUTH 23 REG HOURS 102.19 204066 NOEL NICHOLS 22 REG HOURS 98.15 204067 CRAIG SCHOLLE 22.50 REG HOURS 92 . 33 TOTAL GENERAL 13,834.61 TOTAL LIQUOR 3,055.75 TOTAL PAYROLL 16,890.36 - 6 -