The URL can be used to link to this page

072390 CC Reg AgP , ' . . B. Roll Call Mayor Haugen Gaqne Watten Stover Brancel CITY OF SHOREWOOD. "," REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 23, 1990 .'; COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5755 COtlNTRY CLUB JlOA.J)'; 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. CONVENE A. Pledge of Allegiance C. Review Agenda 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Council Meeting - July 9, 1990 (Att.No.2A-Minutes) B. Council Workshop - July 16, 1990 (Att.No.2B-Minutes) 3. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approving Street Light for Harding Lane and WedgeW~.4>:'~~i..\te' and Approving Street Light for SmithtownRoad and'weci<1~~!1;)%;';i.ve (Att.No.3A-Petition and.Pl..dn.er'., Memo) B. Set date for Public Hearing on Assessment of Delinquent Water and Sewer Bills, Property Clean"'ups, Water Connec- tion for Aug\1st 27, 1990, at 8:00 P.M.. c. B. Planning Commission 4. COMMISSION REPORTS A. Park Commission 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT - SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES Location: West. side of Strawberry Lane, 420 feet soutnof Smithtown Road -1- Applicant: North Suburban Development Company (Att.No. 5-Planner' s M_of' 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. < - AGENDA - MONDAY, JULY 23, 199U PAGE 2 b. VARIANCE FOR TWO DWELLINGS ON ONE LOT . Location: 24620 Smithtown Road Applicant: Don Messenger (Att.No.6-Planner's 7. SE~BACK VARIANCE Location: 4225 Enchanted Lane Applicant: Chester Yanik (Att.No.7-Planner's 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Location: 2414U and ~4250 Smithtown Road Applicant: City of Shorewood (Att.No.&-Planner's ~. KUEMPLE CHIME LANDSCAPE. PLAN (Att.No.9-Complaint OPTION/PURCHASE CROSS PROPERTY- for Public Works REVIEW REVISED ANTENNAE DESIGN - CELLULAR ONE (Att.No.l1-Let.er) UPDATE ON SHADY HILLS DRAINAGE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON AMENDMENT .TO' C:['>>'Kf:IQoB>~\. NOXIOUS WEEDS/GRASS (Refer Planning Commission J(.t~u.~j.);,/-~ CALL A PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE AMENDINGCI'!'YC(1)i:~2.RJ$~ SPECT TO LIQUOR CONTROL (Att.No.14-Statute and'Let.ter) .' CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY . CODE WITH RESP~C'l'rrQ,.;., LICENSING CIGARETTE MACHINES , (At~.No.15-statute) 16. REVIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY ON GLEN ROAD DRAINAGE 17. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR -2- , - ...<.,._~ AGENDA -MONOAY~ JULY 23,1990 PAGE 3 lB. STAFF REPORTS A. City Engineer I. Accepting Improvements on Smithtown Circle 2. B. City Attorney 1. Council eligibility for PERA Defined ContributLon Plu 2. Development Agreement - Phyllis Lovrein C. City Planner I. Stop Signs on Mayflower (Att.No.18C-l-Memo) 2. Update on Nuisance Extensions a) Darlene Dallman b) Edward Moe 3. D. Administrator1s Report I. NO 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. tL 9. Set date for Budget Workshop: August 20, 1990.. . Membership Small Cities AS.sociation (Att. No.18D-2-Letter) , Recommendations for Riley Creek Watershed Board Agenda for Joint Council/Park Commission Meeti~ (Att. No..l&D-4-Ag.enda) Update on Goose Round-up Update on Milfoil Inspection on Christmas Lake School Board Resolution on Water Tower EAsemllmt AMM Policies (Att.No.18D-8-Memo) Permission to Close McKinley Place Cul-de-sac Party -3- , .-". ~ AGENDA - MONDAY, JULY 23..'1990 PAGE 4 19. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Mayor Haugen B. COUNCILMEMBERS '.-/ 20. ADJOURNMBNT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THB CLAIMS (Att.No.20-Claims) -4- bTY OF SHOREWOOD~. . ~~':"~":"7;:;~~~?rA. IL CHAMBERS REGULAR COUNCIL ME -4'. ...~^....... '~'5'7!r'COUNTRY CLUB ROAD MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 PAGE 1 M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Haugen called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Haugen opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Haugen. Councilmembers Gagne. Stover. and Watten and Brancel. Administrator Whittaker. Attorney Froberg. Engineer Norton. Public Works Director Zdrazil. AGENDA REVIEW Brancel moved. Gagne seconded to approve the Agenda with the following additions. 1. Under Council Reports. Councilmember Gagne wanted to discuss the percentage of petitioners need to request improvements. 2. 13-B-1 Add Harding Acres. 3rd Addition. status report. 3. Calendar - Council Meeting is July 23 not 25th. Motion carried - 5/0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Gagne moved. Watten seconded. to approve the Minutes for the Council Workshop of June 20. 1990. Motion carried - 5/0 Brancel moved. Stover seconded. to approve the Regular Council Meeting Minutes of June 25. 1990 with the following amendment: 1. Pg. 3 Fourth paragraph from bottom. should be area. Motion carried - 5/0. COMMISSION REPORTS A. Councilmember Stover reported there was no Planning Commission meeting. 1 c:?f} CITY OF SHOREWOOD ... REGULAR COUNC I L MEE1IfIftG MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 C~IL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 2 LETTER FROM ANGELA WEATHERLY Mayor Haugen read a letter from Angela Weatherly announcing her resignation from the Park Commission. due to personal reasons. Haugen felt she had done an outstanding job and would be missed. Haugen wished she did not have to accept her resignation. She wanted Sue Niccum to find time for the Council to get together to say goodbye to Angela. Anyone interested in the Park position from eastern Shorewood. should contact the City Administrator. Haugen moved. Gagne seconded to accept the resignation of Angela Weatherly from the Park Commission. Motion carried - 5/0. DRAINAGE PROBLEMS - SHADY HILLS APPLICANT: REV. ALMQUIST LOCATION 19355 SHADY HILLS RD. Reverend Almquist presented his concerns about the overflow of the storm sewer near his house. Considerable damage was done during the spring rains and again on June 28th. The drainage pipe is intended to carry water from the west side of his house to a pond in the back. However. when the pipe overflows. the water backs UP against the house: the pressure has broken windows and the water flows through his house to the pond. Rev. Almquist asked the City to find a way to carry the overflow away from his house. He also asked the city for help in repairing the inside of his house. Engineer Norton sited the 1975 drainage report and said that the pipe was designed for a 5 year storm frequency return. The pipe is 24" and this is an accepted design. There have been more storms than normal and Rev. Almquist receives water from three directions. The pipe cannot handle the water in it's current condition. Haugen asked Attorney Froberg what responsibility the City had. Attorney Froberg stated the City had no responsibility for acts of God. unless the City was negligent. Stover asked what it would take to provide proper drainage. Norton indicated that a very large pipe would be necessary and it would not be feasible to try to accommodate the largest storms. He said that a swale with rip-rap could be put in at the lowest point as an alternative. Gagne questioned whether the swale would be earthen. Norton said no. Gagne also questioned repair on private property. The City had done repair on property on IvY Lane. Administrator Whittaker felt the City might be put in a position of having to repair many other properties. If the City was going to repair private property. they must define the terms and conditions. Haugen felt the City should draw up criteria. Stover indicated this was a unique situation. Haugen asked if this was considered a flood or rain. Rev. Almquist 2 CITY OF SHOREWOOD I REGULAR COUNCIL MEET G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 COtAIL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 3 said there was no insurance coverage. Public Works Director Zdrazil said that the City had been out to the site six times this year. Gravel driveways are washing out and increasing the problem. He also indicated that the clean up of the house in 1987 was due to a sanitary sewer back-up. not surface water drainage. Watten moved. Gagne seconded. to instruct the City Attorney and City Administrator to draft a policy on City repairs on private property. Motion carried - 5/0. . Stover and Gagne felt the repairs should start immediately. Norton felt this could be an emergency staff project. Zdrazil and Norton could draw up plans and show them to Rev. Almquist. There would have to be a temporary easement and some removal of trees. Brancel felt the Engineer should have the authority to start the project immediately. Gagne moved. Brancel seconded. to authorize the City Engineer to study the problem at 19355 Shady Hills Road and advise Administrator Whittaker so he can notify the Council of the cost and get approval by phone. Motion carried - 5/0. APPEAL - FALSE ALARM PERMIT APPLICANT: JAMES WOOG LOCATION: 27200 WEST 62ND ST. Brancel moved. Gagne seconded. to deny the appeal from the requirement for a False Alarm Permit of Mr. WOOg. The Council felt there was no basis for his appeal. under the Ordinance. A letter would be sent to Mr. Woog. Motion carried - 5/0. SPEED ZONE STUDY - NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD. APPLICANT: PETITION LOCATION: NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD. RESOLUTION NO. 62-90 Mn/DOT has given Shorewood two proposals for Speed Zones. 1. Continue statutory speed limit of 30. 2. Post 25 MPH; and encourage the City to post curve warning signs. Whittaker stated they recommend against posting City streets as it is confusing. They do. however. recommend posting warning signs on curves. Stover moved. Watten seconded. to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 62-90. " A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Department to Post 4-way Stop Signs at McKinley Place and Near Mountain Blvd." Motion carried on a roll call vote - 5/0. Stover moved. Watten seconded. to direct the Public Works Department to install warning signs on curves. where warranted. on Near Mountain Blvd. Motion carried - 5/0. "< "-' CITY OF SHOREWOOD . REGULAR COUNCIL MEET~G MINUTES, JULY 9, 1990 CO'IL CHAMBERS 57 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 4 PARK COMMISSION REPORT PARK COMMISSIONER WILSON At their June 12th meeting the Park Commission discussed the Silverwood Park trail. Part of the trail is being maintained by the residents. They felt it should be made clear to residents where the trail is located. Administrator Whittaker said he would send letters to the residents pointing out the easement. however. their titles should show this easement. Froberg also stated the County Recorder has these easements on file. Wilson said the Park Commission felt the Freeman Park walking trails should be marked. so people are aware of them. The Commission also felt there should be a sign at both entrances to Freeman Park stating the rules of the Park. They felt the Freeman Park road should remain two way but should be widened. The money for this would come from their proposed budget. Wilson said that $2500.00 had been donate by the Legion for a fountain at Freeman Park and was put in the general fund. Haugen said they should ask the Park Planner for his recommendation on this. A time for a joint meeting of Council and Park Commission would be determined later. Council Liaison Watten cannot attend the July 10th meeting and the Commission felt someone should attend. the Council agreed. Shorewood - T-shirts can be sale at the City Hall. The money helps to support the Parks. There are adult and child sizes. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION RESOLUTION NO. 63-90 VOUCHER +2 AND FINAL PAYMENT FOR FREEMAN PARK BALLFIELD FENCES AND APPURTENANT WORK FOR FREEMAN PARK Gagne asked if the fields had been inspected? Norton said the final fine grading had been done and the fields inspected. Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 63-90. IIA Resolution Accepting Fencing and APPURTENANT Work for Freeman Park and Approving Construction Voucher +2 and Final Payment.1I Motion carried on roll call vote - 5/0. Brancel asked to see a summary of all the costs of the Park fences. MATIERS FROM THE FLOOR OPTION ON BISHOP PROPERTY Mr. LeRoy Bishop spoke and said he was still waiting for a personal visit from one of the Council. He also inquired as to why Mr. Cross was keeping his house and 1 acre of property; while he was asked to sell his entire parcel with his home. Haugen stated that the Staff report would be ready on Thursday and she would call Mr. Bishop for an appointment to meet. Mr. Bishop reiterated his position that Shorewood did not need his property. He said the City of Minnetonka only had 15 acres for it's Public Works and Chanhassen only has 2 acres. He felt the Tom Thumb 4 CITY OF SHOREWOOD . REGULAR COUNCIL MEET~G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 COAIL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 5 site on HwY 19 or the land next to the Shorewood Center would be good locations. Mr. Bishop visited his neighbors and few knew of this matter. He read from his journal of May 24. Administrator Whittaker had phoned him and Bishop said the phone was not the proper place to discuss the matter. The next day he received a letter from Whittaker. He felt Mr. Whittaker should apologize for mentioning condemnation. Mr. Bishop said he felt he is being forced out of his home and that the Council does not feel the pulse of the community. Mr. John Bishop stated that because of Mr. LeRoy Bishop's hearing problem. any conversations or transactions must include Mrs. Bishop or one of their children. Haugen asked John Bishop for his phone number for future reference. Gagne stated that his first comment about this proposal was that Mr. Bishop needed someone with him during the conversations. Stover also stated the Council and Staff were not demanding his property. CHURCH ROAD PETITION Mr. Neil Vegsund of Church Rd. wondered why the Church Rd. petition was not on the Agenda. Haugen said this would be discussed when the take up the majority rule issue. REVIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR IRON REMOVAL/SOFTENING. S.E. AREA WATER RESOLUTION NO. 64-90 Haugen asked Whittaker how many replies the City had received on the Iron Removal Study. Whittaker said he would get the report. Gagne requested they move UP the talk on majority rule because of tha number of people in the audience. They agreed to talk about it after the Iron Removal discussion. Mr. Noel Vogen of Associated Consultants Engineers. Inc. was in the audience to explain the study. Gagne indicated he did not want a detailed explanation now. it would be better to wait until the public hearing. Haugen explained that there had been complaints about the water coming from well :fl: 7 in the Waterford area. This well had been paid for by the developer under the supervision of the City. The City asked Associated Consultants to study the problem. The study indicated that the water was of good quality but high in iron. Mr. Vogen proposed that an iron removal/softener be installed at the pump house. The building would be 20'x 54' x 16'. An unidentified resident of the Waterford area asked who will pay for the system. He also stated that a public hearing was often a difficult time to resolve all the questions. He wanted a COpy of the study to show his neighbors before the public hearing. Haugen said the Council had not decided who would pay for the system. Stover said it was usually the users who paid. usually through rate increases or assessment. Gagne said that he had received many calls and letters from residents who are adamant about not paying for a system they are not using. Gagne did feel it would be a good idea for the residents to have copies of the study. Resident felt one COpy was sufficient. he could make copies. 5 CITY OF SHOREWOOD I REGULAR COUNCIL MEETI G MINUTES. JULY 9# 1990 CO,'-'IL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 6 Whittaker asked the Council if they wanted to present a preferred option at the public hearing. Gagne and Stover felt the options should be left open for the residents to decide. Haugen asked the Attorney how to go about setting a date for a public hearing. Froberg said they needed to pass a Resolution accepting the study and calling for a public hearing. There has to be two public notices published, the last one at least 3 days before the hearing. All of the residents affected will receive letters announcing the hearing at least 10 days before the hearing. Mr. Vogen indicated that the annual assessment would be $40.00 per year for 10 years for all the residents. Stover questions Tables 1 and 2 in the study. She asked why the total cost was higher for 10 years than 20. Vogen said he would check the figures and give them to Whittaker tomorrow, July 10. Gagne moved. Brancel seconded RESOLUTION NO. 64-90. "A Resolution Accepting the Feasibility Study for Iron Removal/Softening in the S.E. Water Area and Ordering a Public Hearing." on the feasibiliby of the Project on Sept. 12. 1990. at 7:30 P.M. at Minnewashta School BREAK - 9:30/9:40 Stover had further questions about Pg. 7 of the study. Vogen answered her first question about Table 1. The table included the City's existing water bond with the proposed assessment but the Staff recommended they separate them on Table 2. Motion carried on roll call vote - 5/0. REVIEW POSITION ON MAJORITY RULE Haugen stated that Gagne had requested the Council review their position on petitions. Currently the policy requires 100% of residents sign a petition to initiate a feasibility study. Gagne said his position is that 51% of the residents should be needed on a petition. If 51% ask for a feasibility study, it should be done. Then. if the majority agree with the study and a project is ordered, all residents of area would be assessed. Haugen said this is a great change in policy and would change the policy for all petitions. Stover said that a prior policy had been very simple. On road improvements people paid by front footage on the road. A petition had to have a majority of people with front footage because they would have a major financial interest. She thought there should be a definite assessment policy even if it were different for roads and drainage. Gagne felt the size of the lot shouldn't matter. Stover felt a person's vote would be weighted on how much they would have to pay. Watten felt if the Council establishes proportional voting a resident would want more than one vote. Haugen said other cities use the number of people on the street. Froberg stated that several things are necessary to even consider a feasibility study. 6 t ITY OF SHOREWOOD . REGULAR COUNCIL MEET~G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 CO'IL CHAMBERS 57 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 7 1. The State Statute says that the owners of 35% of the front footage on a street must sign the petition. or 4/5 majority of the Council is required for approval. 2. The signers must agree to pay for the study in their petition if they are to be charged for the study. 3. If the project is ordered and assessed by the Council. then the feasibility study can be included in the total assessment. Gagne moved. Brancel seconded. to adopt a policy that 51% of affected property owners would be sufficient to call for a feasibility study. Motion carried - 3 aye-2 nay (Watten - Stover). Brancel felt no petition should be accepted without an agreement to pay. Unidentified resident questioned if she would be charged according to how much land she owns. Stover said this was her concern. The people with the least front footage could call for improvements as the policy now stands. Stover moved. Gagne seconded. to adopt a policy whereby property owners would be assessed for road improvements on the basis of footage fronting on the road. Motion carried - 4/1 (Brancel). Mr. Vegsund. Church Road resident. said he should have the same vote regardless of the size of his property. He felt he was equally inconvenienced by a poor road as a neighbor with more land. Mr. Lance DeTrude. a Church Road resident. stated that 51% of those who signed the petition might not own 35% of the front footage. Froberg said this could be a conflict; but. this would be determined -before any improvements were ordered. Whittaker felt any policy that was established would not require the Council to order something they felt was inappropriate. Haugen instructed the City Attorney and City Administrator to put together a petition heading so that people would know they would have to pay. Unidentified resident asked if this project was just blacktopping. Council said it was drainage and blacktop road improvements. Vegsund asked if Church Rd. could hook up to the water system on Maple Lane. Haugen said they could include it in their petition. REVIEW RFP FOR JOINT PROSECUTOR Gagne moved. Stover seconded. to leave the Prosecutor's position as is. Motion carried - 5/0. Haugen said she felt. if the joint prosecutor was housed with the SLMPSD. the residents of the City would not feel represented. 7 C IT'! OF SHOREWOOD . REGULAR COUNCIL MEET~G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 CO'IL CHAMBERS 575 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 8 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR CDBG WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY. RESOLUTION NO. 65-90 Stover moved. Brancel seconded to adopt RESOLUTION 65-90. "A Resolution to Approve a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for CDBG programs for 91/92/93." Motion carried on roll call vote - 5/0 STAFF REPORTS ATTORNEY CHRISTMAS LAKE LITIGATION: The Attorney for Ms. Christensen has notified the City that they are appealing the Trial Court decision. The matter will be heard. by the Court of Appeals. on the record. There will be no new testimony taken. AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 501/502 OF CITY CODE. GRASS CONTROL Stover felt the Planning Commission should see the Amendments first. Brancel disagreed. she felt the Planning Commission had been given an opportunity to draw up these amendments. Whittaker wanted to define the areas to be mowed more clearly. Gagne felt this would not bea problem as it would only be on a complaint basis. Brancel said they are talking about an area that has been let go in a neighborhood of mowed lawns. The previous Ordinance only pertained to noxious weeds not grass. Watten thought the Amendments were ridiculous. that the City was dictating to people. We should allow residents some latitude. Stover felt grass length was not a health. safety or welfare problem. simply a matter of taste. She reminded the Council that the Planning Commission was against this. Brancel moved. Gagne seconded. to adopt an Ordinance Amending section 502 of the Shorewood City Code Relating to General Health and Safety Provisions on grass height. Motion failed - 2 aye /2 nay (Haugen abstain). Watten wanted to know what provisions the City has for surveillance. Haugen said her concerns were with the residents who have 2-3 acres. They might not want to mow it all. Haugen moved. Watten seconded to send the Amendments to the Planning Commission for comments. Motion carried - 3 aye-2 nay (Brancel and Gagne). ENGINEER HARDING ACRES: Norton said Harding Acres 2nd and 3rd Additions were to be completed last year. The 2nd Addition is completed. except for blacktop. S CITY OF SHOREWOOD I REGULAR COUNCIL MEET G MINUTES, JULY 9, 1990 COAIL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 9 Norton sent certified letters to Mr. Jack Worledge and Mr. Adrian Johnson, the developers, officially notifying them that, if the projects were not completed by July 1, 1990, the City would finish them and draw against the letter of credit for the cost. Mr. Worledge did contact the contractor, in June, to complete the 2nd Addition. Norton told them to hold off until they heard from Mr. Johnson about the 3rd Addition. Mr. Johnson did not reply by July 1 and now wants a thirty day extension. The Staff felt he should not be given an extension of time as he had ample time to complete the work. Norton wants the Attorney to review the development agreement and wants the Council's authorization to proceed with the work and draw on the developer's letter of credit for the cost. Gagne moved, Watten seconded, to authorize the City Administrator, working with the City Attorney and City Engineer, to arrange for the completion of the road work and appurtenances in Harding Acres 2nd and 3rd Additions and to draw on the letter of credit for the cost. Motion carried - 5/0. ADMINISTRATOR MPELRA CONFERENCE: Gagne moved, Stover seconded, to authorize the Administrator to attend Wednesday and Thursday of the MPELRA Annual Meeting in St. Cloud. Motion carried - 5/0. FRANKLIN DAILY PLANNER SEMINAR AND PROGRAM Whittaker recommended the staff attend this seminar and obtain the day planners. Haugen said the seminar could be obtained on tape and only Whittaker should attend the seminar. Watten moved, Brancel seconded, to authorize the Administrator to attend the Franklin Seminar and to obtain the tapes and day planners for the Staff. Motion carried - 5/0. USE OF THE CITY ENGINEER IN PARKS: Whittaker referred to his letter of June 29, 1990. The letter set out 6 alterntives for the use of OSM and VDHS in the City. Gagne felt the City should work with the Park Commission. Park Commissioner Wilson felt VDHS had more experience with parks and the Park Commission wanted them. Gagne moved, Brancel seconded, to adopt alternative 2, using VDHS for Park projects exclusively. Motion failed - 2 aye-3 nay (Haugen, Stover, Watten). Stover felt *4 would be best, it allowed the Administrator to make the decision who to use on a project. Whittaker stated that, if the Council preferred *4, then they had to recognize that * 2 was true. VDHS has all the necessary disciplines to do the Park projects. He preferred not to pay two firms for the same positions. Stover felt that having OSM and VDHS would not be 9 'CITY OF SHOREWOOD I REGULAR COUNC I L MEET G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 CO~IL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 10 duplication. The Administrator would decide when OSM would handle the project and when to use VDHS. Norton said that most park projects needed very little civil engineering. Haugen moved. Gagne seconded. to authorize the City Administrator to decide who will do the Engineering work in the Parks. Motion carried - 3 aye-2 nay (Gagne and Brancel). PERA CONTRIBUTION: Councilmembers agreed to allow Council participation in and City contributions to the PERA Defined Contribution Plan. Froberg will find out if they can do this immediately or need to wait until Jan. 1, 1991. as this may constitute a pay raise under State Statute. COUNCIL REPORTS. HAUGEN: Haugen said an 8 years old boy. who is dying of cancer. wanted to get in the Guiness Book of World Records by receiving the most get well cards. She encouraged residents to send cards. GAGNE: ' He said he would go to the Park Commission meeting on July 10. 1990. He said both speakers would attend the July 16th Elderly Housing Meeting. STOVER: Did Trivesco ever own the water system? Norton said no. She said she had information for Council on the TIF conference she attended. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed July 12 report would have a complaint against a Shorewood resident. Administrator said he would find out about it. BRANCEL: When would the yellow house on Smithtown Road be burned down? The neighbors were wondering. Administrator would find out from the Fire Dept. She was interested in returning to goal setting for the Council and felt the Council was repeating the same topics for discussion. There should be a workshop on priority items. Whittaker said there have been. WA TTEN: Shorewood has a competitor in the Olympic Festival, Katie Pilley and Council should recognize her. Administrator said he would send a letter to her. He mentioned the Shorewood T-shirts will be on sale for $12.00 Haugen said they had a letter from Martin Zgraggen concerning a noise barrier on the Vine Hill Road Intersection. City has heard nothing from Mn/Dot. City also received a letter from Mark Kelly, of the Excelsior Chamber of Commerce. thanking the City for their contribution to the Fourth of July fireworks. 10 , CITY OF SHOREWOOD I REGULAR COUNC I L MEET G MINUTES. JULY 9. 1990 COAIL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 11 ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Brancel moved. Gagne seconded. to adjourn the meeting at 11:40 P.M.. subject to the payment of claims. Motion carried - 5/0. GENERAL AND LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCOUNT NUMBER 00-00166-02 Checks issued since June 22. 1990. Checks No.4664-4703 GENERAL $16,454.48 $ 43. 091. 46 TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL $50,938.91 LIQUOR $26,636.46 Checks No.4637-4664 TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST $94.030.37 PAYROLL REGISTER JULY 9. 1990 Checks No.204175/204214 GENERAL $12,607.30 $15.664.53 LIQUOR $3.057.23 TOTAL PAYROLL RESPECTFULLY SUBMITIED. Katie Snyder Recording Secretary MAYOR JAN HAUGEN ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK LAURENCE E. WHITIAKER 11 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~ COUNCIL STUDY SESSIO~ MINUTES. JULY 16. 1990 COvaL CHAMBERS 575~OUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 1 M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Haugen called the Council Study Session to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Haugen. Councilmembers Gagne. Stover. Brancel Administrator Whittaker. Planner Nielsen. Dick Hanson. Real Life Development. Frank Reese. Absent: Councilmember Watten. AGENDA REVIEW Gagne moved. Stover additions: 1. Item* 2. Item * 3. Item * 4. Item * seconded. to approve the Agenda with the following 6 - Bishop Option. 7 - ~lmquist. Shady Hills. 7A - Joint Prosecutor. 8 - Adjournment. drainage problem. Real Life Development Proposal for Elderly Housing Mr. Hanson asked Councilmember Gagne how he had heard of his company. Mr. Gagne said he had talked to the City of Waseca and was told of their elderly housing project and he knew of Real Life's work at 7500 York Ave. So. Edina. Mn. Hanson explained that he had worked for the Housing Authority for 14 years before starting Real Life. Real Life worked with the Ebenezer Society on many types of elderly housing: life care. rental. condominiums. endowments. They had finally decided that cooperative housing was the best and most affordable. Now Real Life only developes cooperatives on it's own. Their program is run through the HUD 213 program. established in 1939. which insures the mortgages for 40 years if the project is 100% pre- sold. The mortgages are for 40 years. The buildings are owned and managed by the residents. through a cooperative. with professional managers hired by the Board of Directors. The most successful. projects have common areas for socializing and hobbies. Councilmember Stover asked if there must be a non-profit sponsor for the project. Hanson said this was a HUD requirement. She also asked what age range the buildings attracted. Hanson said 74 was the average with 62 years as a minimum. Administrator Whittaker asked if they had health care and dining. Hanson stated that all of their buildings had food programs. Health care was part of the program. but not acute care. Stover stated that the Council had been told that the buildings must be located close to transportation and a shopping center. - Hanson said this was not true. Many elderly still drive and transportation is provided through the coopeative. Gagne asked if the 55-62 age group is included in his buildings. Hanson indicated that they had a 62 year.minimum. 1 , , CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL STUDY SESSIO MINUTES. JULY 16. 1990 co,Ar L CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 2 Planner Nielsen asked how they could afford these services for small projects? Are they volunteer? Hanson explained that the income comes from two sources: shares that are sold in the building and the monthly mortgage and dues payments. The Administrator of the Building is paid. They have many volunteer people but they also have a paid staff. Nielsen asked if the Board of Directors decides what services will be offered in the building. Hanson explained that they do and there are certain minimum services: 1. Food 2. Common Rooms 3. Kitchen 4. Exercise room 5. Craft room 80% of the income comes from the residents. Hanson reiterated that the housing must be affordable. The Council needs to identify a need and desire in the residents of Shorewood for elderly housing before the project is started. The whole community needs to be involved. so that there can be mutual assistance. The building site should be at least two acres with no northern exposure. Their bu~ldings are S shaped. The apartments are 1-2 bedrooms and from 600-700 sq. ft. to 1600 sq. ft. There are guest rooms in the buildings for visitors. Efficiency apartments are not popular. The buildings are 1 story. because this is mQst affordable and manageable for residents. A one story building costs $29-30 a Sq. ft. but a two story can be double that. Whittaker asked how long the project should take. Hanson said about one year. Hanson indicated that HUD would not allow him to start a project in the Shorewood area due to the abundance of projects in the Metropolitan area. Nielsen inquired about the requirements of the Fair Housing Act. Hanson said that since they build for HUD and they provide the services for their residents. they can limit the age range to 62 and older. They will adapt an apartment for handicapped residents but a deposit of $3000.00 must be made. so that the apartment can be returned to the standard condition after the resident moves out. Gagne asked how we start. Hanson said to pick a site and a plan. Then show this to the community. Do mailings to determine need. Whittaker asked if Real Life was the coordinator from the beginning and how they are paid. Hanson said they are paid by the project and would help in the coordination. He said he would be interested in building in the Shorewood area. if HUD would allow it. Nielsen asked if it was hard to pre-sell these units. Hanson said they only required a $10.000.00 to $20.000.00 investment. A 32 unit building is the most economical. They need city water. FRANK REESE PROPOSAL FOR ELDERLY HOUSING Frank Reese is an architect. resident of Shorewood and formerly a member of the Shorewood Planning Commission. .., ..:.. ..:.:-_~:~. L,. .._ ..~1: ~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD , COUNCIL STUDY SESSIO MINUTES. JULY 16# 1990 COAIL CHAMBERS 57~COUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 3 He stated that he had done a lot of elderly housing projects. The one story or "cottage" design is being built by John Arkel, in Stillwater. and Mike Wiley, in Champlin. He said that, right now# financing is hard to obtain. TIF may be used. Chanhassen is in the process of getting commitments and planning elderly housing. Judith A. Marshik does market studies for Municipalities on elderly housing. Gagne asked if this was feasible in Shorewood. Reese said that a 32 unit building would work. He strongly recommended rental units. He felt that elderly buildings did not hold their resale value. Reese emphasized that the buildings must reflect a variety of income levels to make the development economically feasible. HUD will underwrite a City's bonds for this type of development. However, if they provide the financing, they get much more involved. Council said they did not want the City to own the building. Whittaker asked if the City can be assured the building will remain elderly. Reese said yoU cannot be assured. Nielsen asked, if the City puts up the land, can the conditions be different? Reese said yes. Gagne asked what should the City look at? Is the need there? Reese said he thought the need was there because people are moving away. Stover and Gagne felt that the "cottage" type of building should have separate entrances for each resident. Nielsen stated that the common thread of the two discussions was that a market study needs to be done first. Can we use CDBG money? A market study by Ms. Marshik could cost $4000.00 to $5000.00. Whittaker said he would check into this. Reese stated that the Council must show a willingness to follow through on the project when they get the study. Gagne asked Reese if he was volunteering to help. He said yes. Haugen questioned if there was a conflict of interest or if Reese could be locking himself out of bidding for the project. Whittaker asked what his normal role was. Reese indicated that he is an architect and on the payroll of one developer but he didn't feel this would present a problem. It was decided that Gagne, Haugen and Whittaker would meet with Ms. Marshik and report back to the full Council. COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY OPTION FOR ELDERLY HOUSING Whittaker said that Hennepin County can help the City with a financing_n package. They are the facilitator. He felt they should check all options for Elderly Housing. Gagne and Stover felt there were usually too many conditions attached to Hennepin County's assistance. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PARK COMMISSION MEETING. The date for the joint meeting was set for Tuesday, August 14, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. -:r "-' CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~ COUNCIL STUDY SESSIO~ MINUTES. JULY 16. 1990 COt'-'L CHAMBERS 57~OUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 4 BISHOP OPTION Mayor Haugen said she had taken the Planning Commission report to Mr. Bishop personally. His wife and son John were with him. Mr. Bishop had a number of complaints about the City staff and policies. Haugen asked why he had stated that his property was not for sale but could be bought. He said anything could be bought. Gagne and Brancel felt the City should forget about Bishop's property and just buy the Cross property. Nielsen said the City could make do with the Cross property but would not have room for future use and they may not be able to buffer the property adequately. Stover felt Bishop might sell in the future because the value of his land would deteriorate with a Public Works Department next to him. Whittaker felt there were many ways the purchase could be accomplished: 1. Get a right of first refusal. 2. Buy just tne rear of property. 3. Give Mr. Bishop a 5 year tenancy or even life tenancy. 4. Maybe just a different price. stover felt the minutes should reflect that if the property should come UP for sale in the future the Council should purchase it. Stover and Haugen felt there should be one more offer made. Gagne and Brancel said no. Whittaker said the last letter to Bishop stated that the City would pay for an independent appraisal. Gagne agreed they should have one more appraisal and one more offer. He also felt the first offer of $200.000.00 was too low. Stover felt the City should approve the appraiser Bishop chooses. Haugen said she would call John Bishop. The Council agreed that they would not condemn the Bishop property. ALMQUIST - SHADY HILLS DRAINAGE PROBLEM Whittaker said the City Engineer had studied the problem and found there were more problems than first thought. The drainage pipe into Almquist's property is 25 years old and made of corrugated metal. which is rusted. A new pipe and catch basin will have to be installed at a cost of $24.000 to $25.000. The City did not install the original pipe. It was probably installed by the developer of Shady Hills There is no easement on the plat. The City cannot afford to repair this with the General Fund. A special taxing district could be used. Haugen asked if the City could install a pipe within the old pipe. Whittaker will ask the City Engineer. Gagne asked if we had fixed anything at that site in the past. Haugen said the City installed curbs and cleaned the pipe. Whittaker said they will not proceed with repairs until a final estimate is proposed and the easement confirmed. Gagne asked Whittaker to call Rev. Almquist. Gagne said at some time the City will have to start repairing drainage problems. Whittaker said the City had not been part of this development. 4 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ~ COUNCIL STUDY SESSIO~ MINUTES. JULY 16. 1990 cor A L CHAMBERS 57~OUNTRY CLUB ROAD PAGE 5 JOINT PROSECUTOR Gagne said he had heard that the City was not a prompt in their prosecutions. Haugen and Whittaker indicated that the problem had been solved. There would be no need at this time for a joint prosecutor. LIQUOR STORE Stover said the Shorewood Liquor Store had been burglarized. No money was taken. Whittaker said he received a COpy of a report from Police Chief Rick Young on what to do to the liquor store to prevent this in the future. ADJOURNMENT Brancel moved, Gagne seconded to adjournment the Study Session at 10:35 P.M. RESPECTFULLY SUBMI~D, Katie Snyder Recording Secretary MAYOR JAN HAUGEN ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK LAURENCE E. WHITTAKER 5 ~~ MEMORANDUM . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 TO: llffi.YOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 19 JULY 1990 RE: STREET LIGHT REQUESTS - WEDGEWOOD DRIVE FILE NO.: 405 (STREET LIGHTS) Our office has received petitions (see Exhibits A and B) requesting that the City install street lights at two locations on Wedgewood Drive: 1) at the corner of Smithtown Road; and 2) at the corner of Harding Lane (see Site Location map - Exhibit C, attached). These locations are consistent with Shorewood's policy for the location of street lights, and approval is recommended. One of the petitions also asks for a "blind intersection" sign for cars westbound on Smithtown Road, approaching Wedgewood Drive. As of this writing, the City Engineer and I have not investigated this matter. We will, however, be prepared to report prior to Monday's meeting. This report will be sent under separate cover. If you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior to Monday evening. BJN: ph cc: Larry Whittaker Jim Norton Glenn Froberg Lindy Aagaard Beverly Ginther ~.~. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore \..,-.,~ . ~ . . JUL 9 \990 PETITION To the city of Shorewood: We respectfully request that the city of Shorewood install a street light at the intersection of Harding Lane and wedgewood Drive. The addition of this light will enhance the visibility and safety of this corner, particularly for automobiles egressing onto Wedgewood Drive. Thank you f~r your consideration to our request. Name: Address: Date: -revnu' .J- ~(:e. . .~ 5-)i....7D 5 - -90 /J.Jt. S"-Jtf- 90 ~ - I! -j'{) ;--z1-1'o S-27' /0 5" -J.C( -CfC/ ,)A/ 5-29- 7- -9a ~ s~.s- K /t1arc6"cZU &dff" I_~__u I W~7~\ (ij~ ~~i ~0~ . ".. J 411) o~;<.5 Exhibit A STREET LIGHT PETITION Wedgewood Drive/Harding Lane . . ~ 1ft .. ,t;,Iy-(.e-q,:.... .... PETITION To the city of Shorewood: We respectfully request that the city of Shorewood install a street light at the intersection of Wedgewood Drive and smithtown Road. We also request that the City install a sign approaching wedgewood Drive on smithtown from the East that reads "Blind Intersection". We feel this will improve the visibility and safety of this corner, particularly for automobiles egressing onto Smithtown from Wedgewood. Thank you for your consideration to our request. Address: j<i~-n v~. ~ d-eu at ;/::h e V' 1J1- fff1c; \ Exhibit B STREET LIGHT PETITION Wedgewood Drive/Smithtown Road j I (6) '" '" '" 2 (7) r '--/.... ~ ....... ~ (47i; o ~ 586' 27'( rEan rE!:{~ 7...... ..- ,-.,...... - ~.~";-' " .... 3 :e (8) J/-:::. ~ o ... 4 ....118... - '-OOc 100 100 -=--?:., .~ .-:"""' ... .... .... .... , . 2 . ~ (24) ~ ......... ....? /.. .' 1 390. B ( 15 ~ :5) ,'.' ~., ,"'..... ~....12, " /......,....>: :: --.:> ,.,,~') (35) -c: \-::;-. H .-f; /..~ /.' ../ ___J - . ',:,: ~ '\, ...,: .t~" ~ , :'~ ~: It) ..t'J_- (27);;: '.;t.'" : :: '\,:'" '-:';" 11~: ~.... .-7 ~ -iIIof 1---- _______..J " .- _I ~:8 ~:~ ~ :- ~ (28) __._____ ____..:, I ~ 2 ........................ ~ r--- i------.; - /-,:\0.... ~.......... I", I. :~ , ~: .." ~~--- -------- ------ I , I , ~u ......", : .66.": , , 19::l . -.." -~ ! .~ ,-' :-.J '_ 1'/',/ _~ : . ",. : "'~-y/ ,-, L.. ."~ I . I , I , I I I , I I , , , I I I I I I I I I ~(UJffl~~~ I , I I I I I I I I ;. : I I I ; ...r.... 416; "- .~ cJ j ./\. 5 ( 19) I , I ;-0 -? ~~. ''-' ! ~~ ~ I "Jr '-,,:~. : t :.~~. '..' : ", ." I I , , , I I I I I ( 14) '" :;: ..... ^ 81 (6) -... / /. i...... ,,'''/.' ~ 3 ~7t:C' ~ (20) ........ (i5) ~ " '- ........ ..... " ,.... (29) < /. ............. .." -' (18) ~ 6 (21) :R 7 ( 23) .., :tl 8 ( 24) ~OT 99 ~ ................_~ '" .' "': ~ .... ... ~ zoo .... Exhibit C SITE LOCATION Wedgewood street light requests to RooS ( 16) I I ( :14 \ ~" . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCIL Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Braneef Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 2 JULY 1990 RE: SHOREWOOD SUBURBAN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAT FILE NO.: 405 (90.14) BACKGROUND North Suburban Development Company requests approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide 11.38 acres of property located on the west side of Strawberry Lane, approximately 420 feet south of Smithtown Road, (see Site Location map _ Exhibit A, attached). The property is zoned R-1A, Single-Family Residential. As can be seen on Exhibit B, the developer proposes to create 11 new lots, all of which meet or exceed 40,000 square feet in area. The property is currently undeveloped and surrounded entirely by single-family residential development, zoned R-1A. It is the remnant of a previous four-lot plat known as Westlawn Two. The site is extremely flat and presumeably characterized by a high water table, as is the surrounding area. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Following is how the developer's proposal compares to the requirements of Shorewood's Zoning and Subdivision Codes: A. Zoning Requirements. 1. Lot Area. As mentioned the proposed lots all meet or exceed the minimum lot area requirement of 40,000 square feet. They range in area from 40,000 to 50,000 square feet. The largest lot, located in the southeast corner of the plat, contains approximately 10,000 square feet of ponding area. The lots average 41,327 square feet. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 5 - 2 - Re: Shorewood SUburb~Estates Preliminary Plat 2 July 1990 . 2. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control. From a planning and zoning perspective, this plat is very simple to review. The engineering aspects of the plat are somewhat more complicated, however, particularly drainage. The developer plans to drain most of the plat to a proposed ponding area located in the southeast corner of the site. From there it flows under Strawbe~~y Lane where it is conducted to the east and ultimately north to a wetland system adjoining Lake Minnetonka. The City Engineer will review and comment on the acceptability of this drainage proposal in a separate report. His report should also address whether larger than normal drainage easements are necessary based on the proposed drainage plan. 3. utilities. The developer proposes to extend an eight inch sanitary sewer lateral from the existing force main located in Strawberry Lane. Since water main has not been shown on his preliminary utility plan, it is assumed that the lots will be served by private wells. 4. Park Dedication. Given the proximity of the property to Cathcart and Freeman Parks, it is assumed that park dedication will be in the form of cash in lieu of land. Based upon current fees, the developer will have to pay $500 per lot, or $5500 in total. This must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 5. General Design. As mentioned in the preceding Lot 11 is technically oriented differently than the other 10 lots. This is considered necessary, however, due to the limited amount of available frontage on Strawberry Lane. The east side lot line of Lot 5 is more oblique than what is normally desired. However, given the irregularity of the north boundary of the plat, a very unusable yard space would be created if an attempt were made to straighten it out. That and the relatively large buildable area for Lot 5 make the design acceptable. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding, the plat meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the Shorewood Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The primary issue to be resolved as of this writing is drainage. It is therefore recommended that preliminary plat approval be granted subject to the following: 1. The City Engineer must approve plans for grading, drainage, erosion control and utilities. Drainage is also subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2. The final plat should include drainage and utility easements 10 feet on each side of side and rear property lines - larger where specified by the City Engineer. - 3 - " . . Re: Shorewood Suburban Estates Preliminary Plat 2 July 1990 3. When submitting the final plat, the applicant must provide a title opinion for the property, up-to-date within 30 days of when the Council will review it. 4. Park dedication fees, $5500, must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 5. The staff should be directed to prepare a standard development agreement upon receipt of the final plat information. 6. The final plat must be submitted within six months of preliminary plat approval. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Jim Norton Glenn Froberg North Suburban Development Co. Steve Johnston - 4 - ,... ;.;. . ~ 2 ~ .! g 2!:: ~ g . @ ~ I!!!.!I I 0 ~ m :g C!PD ~ co in '" .. ~ ~ -$-? [ rp~' --------l-------------------- ' . , <').' ~ on ,,'i) '" 'D" , ')-, ------ -1----------------,--- ......~.:.~~.1....cx::..................: g ~i..I~ e @ : 0 ,::L_J_______~____j ~ ~ &l e '" 2 !! '" .. 00l fI', ~ ~ ... 0:- ..: '" lD '" ... . ... . [t R R '..; ,~' (,--- f. ) a ~ (f? tZ',c- ~ ..s: ~ , 00< ...'" 9t 00.: -G:; t, , r.~ .' \ '., f. ) 1$., , i" , \l v...... ' ( " v I -a ~ ~ !:: ... ~ -= ,., ~ ~ ~ -5? ~ ~ ,.,!:! +- .tl1 ~ \6 ~ t~j e:; .. ~ ... ~ '" ~ ~ dZ +j .. [t'Lt. [t'Lt' [t'Lt. ~. ~ fI} ~ ~ ~ :<it ') ~ \j) ~ ~ !:: ... ,., .!::! ...~ . ....... ~ ~ ::l ~ eo , 2' l -. i , to\: , : :JIl , ! ~ . U')l "'l -i ~ " ~ ):=0 ~ s ~ ,.,'" ~ ~ .... ~ W IF'' Ie, @m <ll: ~ co ~ e=- N ll6t ~ eo 'Z9l go'9Z', ~ ,,, , I \ -.,/ \~,; ~ \D':" N _"'" III ~ .o.9t, I >- 'I) ~ 1'\ - . . \, "' \0 -= ~ I ~~ . ~ (; .... ~ <<J /J " ~ 1\/ t.--, i~ 1: : ; ~ : I eG. ~ i ~ ~! ~,/ .~: " t:';& I J - '. - : I 7: "-.", ~ : ;.........091 ..~...~...;........l91 ...........; : (Q) ,","A: : !~<'~',t j i 1 I ,. I I , 8\ "'Z, Ol' _~,!_ __ -l-_62.UL.....L _JI'L-.15__ ' '069 ......... .. ...:-r- z'oa , I l , ) ; I ;, I .. ,'\ ' I, ' 'l) i \ .' (I", " \.l \.{) 1\ " ( \.:\ V'i !I <~., '0" \J' ~-) .. ... ~i'z,o' -lGF~lt ',tt ~..=. rl~ ~~", ~: ~ ~ : ~ ) j:: , ~,' ~ ',' '.,' \\',~i .. ~ :! ....-) _ 'l ' ~t ~; it, on N~ Z6'!19 ~,"" ette , I~ ~ co'" ~'"\" ,~'l;l;t I., " ~ '(j r ,-- ZUZ 1,' ~ ,- co.... . - - ',"C \ ~s = ........ fOf ..!::: l"'~ ''-1 ___ r'f;' Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Shorewood Suburban Estates - Preliminary Plat .~\ I I ~I II ". , , , , , , , . , '\ '. \ It I : I I . I , I, I . '" ~ I I I I , I I I , , """ "" , ..., ~/' ~ , ~ , ,// / 1 , 1 , /1 / I , / , , .../ 01, 0, I ~ " '':'' - -. -- -'-'<:~-_.~"'~'''''~~,~r'J~IliI.~l , ........._-...... .'.... - \ ", . un "", , ~ \ \ j;: "':-", " ",.-, \J, \ i;; "> , i~, , ;, 1E1D IN I \ '- ........ ',___ \,\" , '- ....'....., f / s ~...._-____.......... '........... \: / \ o }J- ' 1 n u " if=-....-;::--- '" I ~ 5 - '-l--\:::' .-"------_~", _ _':.::::=. -:.-=-~/ ~ I _ ,-:-~- --=- I ,,__.... --;\ DR.IIVE I .'1' I. I ~ X. ---'- _l! --'<;- - _ _ ---L: - - -;-- ~ T'I '---)-. ---r=- ......:.--.-.~.- .... ~ . ",,--' - '''il " u !, -:~:.:,;~~__>,_.... u I ),' / ....,', ' -, , ',', I ,fit/ -~.. i. / _---, "" " ! ~ I; /,/---- I".... ""'- '........,-_/:~ 1~IJ ,ha:t..~ ' /' ,,I ...., ........- -"", \ if' I -:. -r~ ~ / I / '"". ____ ,/, S- /,IT I I -....,,_ _-- ....\U,~ I I 'f ~ " '1 , , ___ ___ , ~:; 'i}: ./'" ~ r\-"\---~~~T~-~~-"~~-~~_-_=_~~:':-- \'J{lfr . ,/ '1 /-, I \ \ ,.,,--,: 0 R \J ~ , .. I ,I I, '-- I I a ~ I 0'';"',,., 1\ ~ /1/ II~r"""" " ~ I I [} ,/I I' I ....-, , , I ~ 1/1 " ..:. I I ;0 0 "'! ill II /f"'" ~..: 1<30'- 9JSj -------- ! / II 'II I .... ...". _ __ '.... ------- -'//'/1 '.... II __ "-------------------:.-.:-------94>4--:::::::-.::-/ I~ I, I 0 " : I a ---. { ---I ' ----- --- -91<...-----_--- , ,I " , "--.J ~ : (~~~--/ I ','1 ~ _- ---------- . "'~ -:::=-- , , I I , . -86-06-- N 00 Og-;"oo..W,.... '--...--------- .,_, -=---~-c..-~:===-==:..:--;l,_:-.===.=-=--..=.=.. --:--- r. . '2~~" //----- ....'.-'...., //-::-:::--..., J 11 1,1' .:'~. -',-/ '...., , I ", / I -- ---- , , I , , ! ; ~__u--_-_____ ---------------c-T- II ~ ( ,~, .-.... : =;-- -==- --~:;;;;-" ,~~ Ii ----(--;-::'- CD':::: 0 ~-- /-/ ,/: Q' --= _ '~, 1::'" r ,,,.) q ,;:::", //' I ~ . I. II I nJ,.-:::::: -- , '- I \ 0), i:;::::----- -,..- , , . 1:11 I I '-.--'-' _---- I , I b n I '--- ----- ;' __ .I~ ' p ^ I ,1___,__..../ '\ \ " g U1 I N 00 09' 00 . W " \: I ,/ ~;/,'/ : ~.53~361 ~ , / l \ ~ rl ~ ~ J r~ ~'! [! '11, :"',! I I I ~: _c'< i \ "- ~ . \ ) i III :.. · --'..- 1 · ! ~ \ Il, ~ :J " \j ;-! --------"\ \ ! 1, g ff , )1 ~ ~ ~ [ \ i!n! '- - - - - - - - - - ../ 'I I II 'Ill III -_ 247_::;"~--_..J / - - --....-==:::.- z ,/ - - - -: :g i \! I 1\ / ~ : QJ: ~ I I" ,/ g ::: i .~, \ i,1 If! w I ~\\ I t', , : : ~ '" \ I " \ 11 ~ "" : Ul \ I ~ [ Ii, I .~- : : I \ I!I ).,' , : : "" I I Ii - - J ! i ~ · \! 11 Ii ,/ I '. ; i I I \ Ii ,/ L '" '" / \ ~ [ \: Iii I! /,- ,/~y.l \. - IJ/"ll 1\ C5 / "-----------...._, ! I 1'1 \ 45 ~~"./ ''44 89\. / I . I !ll~" N 00 17' 20 ('W \ I 1 ';:'4 o! r; z "'--------.-\, III ) \.. ~oo 0 0 \, 1,1 I: (D ~ I - \ ll. \..., ~ ~ (D ~ I ::! 1r."I,.. 0 ',I I g ~ Ii! j'q, 0 r ~ ~ ::---XQ,J II II o ~ . I Q,o 0 () ,~i:-7.((j><~~ l, ~ rn -____ 10 0" I ~g---~\..~ \ I / : \ \: / , I 'l,L / , \ I _/ " \ ~y.-... ) - ~':-:.'f~ - - -:.:.:::... 't:p~c ~- , , , , , ., , , I I I / 1 1 / 1 I I , , '.... -- ---"""-1- T '\ 1)'1 ,-"/ 0; '"' \ ',i ...." I I I \ : '- \'~,_J""-'} ... -J1Jk-/:;~I.... "-~--' -- _:;.- 10 ..... . \ .",......-.....' ------ .. -,------- ---.... ~ ~ =. ---.:.. _:.:::::::=~ - OiL---,L -L -:J c~~~____~ ,.J "",,"'" ,..- n c____.... '-'--'r.-r-t.-f'-l \ I , -L "-'f-- I , I ''-\ " I I ' , I I. I \, ---- 'I" r -- , I ~ I # \--------; If ", !If \\, ) [ / t ,/ I , I , 1 , , 1 , ,. ,,' " / ~ /", l 1 , , ~/' I .-. ill / c;; '" -I 1- :ill ./ ~,/ --~ us '" " :ill c( I _ I I 0 _~-..../""./ ) 1\ - . -~~~ -,...------- (:::-::=:0- 0 - . - --~ '__-t!64' -...;j', ., , o " 1 " z cJ m I U1 OJ tN ow ON .~ '""':.... IT., .. p 0 0 m 0 !II J:I """ "" ~ ,.... '.. 1 22 _ ~ _ _, r--------- \ , . \ I I I \ I b I I P \ I \ , g to \ I 0 \ I !II \ I J:I \ I;: \ , , , , I , L------~5------- , , I , \ \ ~\ I \ ~ "', , " , --"1\ ~ ..~ Ii) )0 " o '" % ill r- , I I , I , , I '1 I I , I , ----j I / I ,~ ,". j 'R /..- ,'$ , , I I I J '-------.--- b P g ~ 00 !II J:I 1 r - - - - - - - - -,/ : ,( , ~ r~-- ,', ,I " " I , , l'i:Ul ,', : pp " / I g g / I 100"';' I : ~~f-"" : I __ -,:. , I ""r I I :..... I I,.' I I I / / , / , / , I I , , .. p ~ o o Oru UI J:I """ "" ., 1 I I I o I g I I-'" I .:!: I """ I "" I I I ~__u____u_J b P i, - -<fa - <') .:;' 1; i '. g .. I\) I ?j ." "1\ ~ ~s ~l!! ~ ~I' 1-10 . .~r ~e z 10-J~ ~~ r z.. '0 z ...0 I ... ::r: tR ~ ~ If1 J:) " J:) ~ . ~ Exhibit B PRELIMINARY PLAT o . -., ::E~~ :::J ~ ~ UJcri o::fr I(~UIOO! aH~ a.. .........._ 0 .u _ --....~-"-_::._~'!~IlHlYIlJ.$__ - ...~~"\ r------------:. ~ IE' _.__-= \011 . . = "... ~.. .... .... ,. 'i _ . , ! : ! ~ . -.i...j " ...... ~ ~~ ~ Jo ....-'"------- -~~- .:..::.:.---------...::.::.=.::a. --------- , , -, , I , I I , , I \ , , , " I I , I I I I I I I '.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I : I I I I I I I I , , I I .... I >. I I I I I I I I , ~ I I I .t ~- ~- -. '<II lt1 3\ "'~.." p"... r---------... I , , , , iE/1m ~ ~' , I " ... .. ~ - -...~<-:: I ,'" '/ " " ( I ", 'I I' \ \ " " , '................--:: ,---------------, I ... .. ...--- /" - I : 1 -_/ /,/ --0-;::::- / ......-:::-:::---- ./ ---- /' ---- ( - - -- ---..= -r~--------- / ~ /'-"... , , ../ ................. -', ~-==:.--====::.~~..:r ',r'" 0 I _.--==----..--~--_ ----__ .L-/ )' " I., =-~~ ' -----_____________ r : : "... 1 /~~/ /.::::;::;;,5t-~--:-:-) . I } :: '" '..., : / J? /~/:/'" .., -". ----------------- ) ~ \ ~ ........-_1-, If ,'// v ... '_,1_ ~ ,....... J.~Lj1.L ./' .-c -I!-- ~...... o 0 7.7. , " , I I I I I I I,i { /I/jf_ : .p ,'./ q ,. / /" I I {{, .~.: I , ,---_!: I ~<;; __!t 0..,: . . ,..,--- : ,:_------~~ \"" .f'\<~~~.\," ~ ~\\\ 0 ~ \110 (;' l: ,/ I! I I' I , I I: I 1\ I I: I ;! .. :i : ~! ~~\\ \ '. \ \ I~ i ~ i I i \ i I r 1._ -- i r ~ l I~ I /(/ ~ .~ p-f-+- I ~/ - ~ \ " '\' I/J :: '" Q a: <I. c:I ,. a: a: '" III ~-_. /it / a: -' ~ 10 ~/ en .- , / ,. , ./ ///p. / , \ '---FeeS_ .~ Exhibit C PROPOSED GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -. . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCIL Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Wanen CITY OF SHOREWOOD . 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 3 JULY 1990 RE: MESSENGER, DON - VARIANCE FOR TWO DWELLINGS ON ONE LOT FILE NO.: 405 (90.13) BACKGROUND Mr. Don Messenger proposes to build a new home on his property located at 24620 Smithtown Road (see Site Location map - Exhibit A, attached). He would like to keep his existing residence until the new house is finished. Since Section 1201.03 Subd. 2.c.(5) of the Zoning Ordinance precludes having more than one principal building on a lot, Mr. Messenger has asked for a variance to the restriction. The existing house is located on the front half of the lot approximately 35 feet back from Smithtown Road (see Exhibit B). The new house will be located on the rear half of the lot, 252 feet from the street. The subject property is zoned R-1C, Single-Family Residential and contains 43,706 square feet of area. ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION The applicant's proposal is relatively simple and there is some precedence for accommodating his request. In doing so there are three issues with which the City should be concerned: 1) a deadline for completion of the work; 2) a guarantee that the existing house will be removed; and 3) the existing accessory structure on the site. 1. Deadline. Considering the type of structure being proposed, one year should be more than adequate to complete the new building, demolish the old ones and restore the grade and landscaping on the front of the lot. The "clock" should start upon the Council's approval of the variance. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore (:; -- . _t'. , ](lJJ . " .... ~ II "': Il Il (29lJi (30) ,"' ., . o o o o o , "1'01 " ,~ IJ' 9) ..40" (6) ~ 3: ell Ul Ul ell ::l ()Q ell Ii t""' o () ;l>;l> ~ <: H III 0 Ii Z ..... III ::l n ell l6 r/ (I~ ~. S..J bjtLCoI I 6,t!.l ,.. n ~ 10 II ~ (Z9) II (m (Zd) " - / ::: . ~,.. -'" 100 ii' I I I I (7) I ~ I M))ID) I I .. , -'n "/ . ., ~~/.., r~~ /, (8) LOI U oo~ 47 'i ( 13) ..".~ c.~ ~'l~ S -._- ...-------..----........ ~ ". 7): (14) .." ...................." ~.... ................... : (f)t"':l HX ~::r t"':l ..... 0- ..... ~ :... 7437 ~, ""j'(iij"'"":..,~ -!!!.:J _ '"' 50 '$ (I) (4) 'v"" @ ~ ' N'II 'II (31) Ii"": ! : i (67) ~: . 0 ....";"......110...........; ___1__ ----------1 o !'~ I ;~'.jm ,- I I ,,,- i ! ~~ OO@ .........246.10...... tRACT A 8 'loin" LOT '3 (4) 15 III /................ (68) I! I (~l " rm.'5;:,5--00 ~ i~ ~ ~.......~........, , ,.........-.. 2to. 82 :$> leg a,;. _I~~S-- -- (3Z) i....~;~~.22,.....:35R I 5(t~,-_'.~ :~.. j (/.: : ~~~ (IO;'! i (7) : 1 : I I":": 25 : ~..~_....- (II) ,~~H,-rn:', : (8) t-:-'iOO~: r.,'~ ;> ~~)/ IJdl ". b.:r i ;' 'lL :-'~' ~ ~. -t . ''''1/ I I 'J( I It'" I ()- />_ :2'!~: ;-,."! ~: (6):: 5 ""r::..~ P~11 r~,-: i 'Yc~;i _.7, , .../ / ~./ (.. ; ~...j 1'- :;...)//.:: n )'1' : --,!.. ci .,~,i' !'~ ,;; , \ 'AtI"j.~ tO~.~'l ,- J:';-/<./ ~'" II (33) ..:'~/ - fE~uo@ . NoA' h ~ot to ~A((, 'i,"_~61'fJ :~ II'S 1'" _- 11'1 ." . OU1LOI I lUff GIf!)!J/U @ STORM SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY WATERSHED DISTRICT BOUNDARY INCREMENT BOUNDARY HENNEPIN COUNTY. MI BUREAU OF PUBlI C SE DEPARTMENT OF PROPE AND PUBlIC RECORDS SURVEY DIVISlON . ,.,,.,.,.,...,......,. i.: .', " ,... <,'I,d- ,," (gf?-Itlo " ..j.,-!/>' ",b ,t:o.b '..{'o'< (.<>'" v<" ~o{'o --- 99.00-h , -, t'l \ ~ \0 J \ r- ,....., "'" ," "\ ~....{ ; \'~ ) .......-.- -, I \ '- \ , . , . -,j "'.......... I j '...-' .-..: ~:.. ......- ." foro " t !>:' ,,<0 ~ 1; .J '0 .. .5 \ ~ "~3= 01 .r: l- \., <0 '1-' ...... lls:l2 DC 0 . <l:...!fi ~....:;; :1:....0 U ~tI'" U >0,'0 % 0.. 41 u)o- ~ ,('~ \) . - "~.:2.9J.Q:--d ...--"-, \ -_..' " I ' I ., :i' I 1 ii. ':,: y.'. .:j:. .-::;:::~~~.' {'.", j....~f i.f'i ~/.:t .:..t::~ .;; ...~ . ~~..(} " . "," " ~ j 1; .. ] -:n ~ Il .r ~ -.' r: ,.., . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Wanen CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 2 JULY 1990 RE: YANIK, CHESTER - SETBACK VARIANCE FILE NO.: 405 (90.16) BACKGROUND In January of 1989, the City Council voted to deny a variance for Chester Yanik, 4225 Enchanted Lane (see Site Location map - Exhibit A), to expand his deck and build a gazebo within the lake shore setback of Lake Minnetonka. You may recall that the deck and gazebo were under construction at the time the variance was denied. Rather than remove the work which had been started, Mr. Yanik chose to complete the construction and wait for the City to take legal action. The City Attorney has given Mr. Yanik the option of bringing the work into compliance or reapplying for a variance. Mr. Yanik chose to reapply for a variance, which suspends further legal action until the Council has acted on the new application. After discussions between Mr. Yanik, his attorney - David Busch, the City Attorney and me, Mr. Yanik agreed to revise his earlier variance request and move the gazebo to the east side of his lot. Exhibit B shows the locations of the existing gazebo and deck and the proposed gazebo location. As proposed the deck requires a 22 foot variance to the lakeshore setback requirement. Instead of an approximate 16 foot lakeshore setback variance for the gazebo, the relocation of the structure requires a seven foot variance to the side yard requirement. Background on the original variance proposal is contained in a staff report, dated 28 December 1988. Since that report is 38 pages long, we have not attached it hereto. If you wish to review that report, please contact me or Patti and we will provide you with a copy. A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore 1 . . Re: Yanik, Chester Setback variance 2 July 1990 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS This report attempts, for the most part, to set aside what has happened in the past and view Mr. Yanik's variance request as though the deck and gazebo do not yet exist. A. Gazebo. The applicant proposes to move the gazebo to the east side of the lot. As such it will conform to the 50 foot lake shore setback but wi.ll require an approximate seven foot variance to the side yard setback requirement. There are certain factors which suggest that a variance in this location may be warranted. First, the side lot lines are slightly skewed to the shoreline of the lake, while the house is situated more parallel to the shoreline. This has resulted in fairly unusable spaces within the buildable area on the lot. Section 1201.05 Subd. 2.b.(1)(a) of the Zoning Ordinance specifically refers to lot configuration in the determination of hardships. The problem with lot configuration is further aggravated by the past changes in City setback requirements. As you recall the side yard setback requirement had previously been 10 feet on each side for riparian lots. More recently the City increased the side setback requirement to a total of 30 feet with no one side less than 10 feet. Under the previous requirement, the location of the gazebo would not require a variance. The area in which the gazebo is proposed to be located is relatively well screened by existing landscaping. If the variance is granted, it is recommended that this vegetation be required to be maintained. Finally, if the variance is to be granted it is recommended that the approximate 15' x 45' triangle of buildable area on the west side of the lot be maintained as open space. In this way the applicant provides the same amount of open space on his lot as those who comply with the setbacks. B. Deck. The applicant has asked that the deck be allowed to remain as it now exists. This requires a variance of almost 22 feet. In 1981 the City approved a variance to allow the deck to be 35 feet from the lake. This same 15 foot variance was recommended by the Planning Commission and was offered by the City Council last year. Based on the previous approvals, it is recommended that the deck be reduced to 16 feet in depth. This is consistent with the initial variance from 1981, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation and Council's offer in 1989 and consistent with a variance granted to the owner of the lot east of Mr. Yanik's. - 2 - . . Re: Yanik, Chester Setback variance 2 July 1990 RECOMMENDATION Based on the preceding it is suggested that if variances are to be granted for the gazebo and deck, the City should impose the following conditions: 1. Existing landscaping which will serve to screen the gazebo from the lake must be maintained. 2. The triangle of buildable area on the west side of the house must be maintained as open space. 3. The deck should be cut back so as to be no closer than 35 feet from the O.H.W. of the lake. 4. The required corrections should be required to be completed within 60 days of the Council's approval. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Chester Yanik David Busch - 3 - . L .... .... .... ~ - li~ i~ r\'\! ! : _, I. :. \--~' '-'. . I (to) . 2 t'\: l\ (\ e:t 01\ k". . Exhibi t A SITE LOCATION Yanik setback variance " . . ,--;J' h ~....-<-;; ;--f c..--; Certificate of Survey L for Robert L. Morgan ots 5 and.6, Block 1, Enchanted HennepIn County, Minnesota Park / // / of <"7'...... 5~ 3/- 7.' t..J Ct<) cf.J.y./J./...:..;..(j ~~,JJJ e ~L,...,./~".-, y ~ , t/ J~(<-, ~~,L t-:~ ~J-..L. /...,~--./ ~ . ,.( (/ . C) ,~~.. ~ 5-30- 90 ~ ~J../' ..,,:;_--,'C(/, ./~ r j'~ .: i J,,,c' ~ ~ ..' i ""l; :L.-,' ,('.. ~ .1 v i 'f:.jt)' N I ).. "l /2J.<>'I" YA.\'\;y. LAKE 1'1 /A/AlE TCJ M f< A ~~ .ra-.^-' ~,~ a-.-~ a.x.-- . ' 1 / / :.J,:t.o?~.../-C. I. / 0' /' ,.....- ,... .,.' /1, /....,-........ ,. ~l" ~ ,.'~ Exhibit B PROPERTY SURVEY /./c c/.. ," /". /'" /[../ -':._ .......:1.,. , " . . MAYOR Jan Haugen COUNCI L Kristi Stover Robert Gagne Barb Brancel Vern Watten CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236 lv\EMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD NIELSEN DATE: 6 JULY 1990 RE: PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE NO.: 405 (90.15) BACKGROUND In 1987 as part of a plan to expand the City offices, an overall improvement program for the Badger Field facilities was reviewed. One of the issues raised in that study was the future space needs of the Public Works Department, Not only has the existing facility reached the 20 percent land area which was originally specified when the property was purchased as a park, it has encroached into the required parking area for the park and City Hall. Since the future of the Public Works Department has an affect on the proposed improvements to the Badger Field site, the City Council directed the staff to prepare a preliminary needs analysis and examine various available sites throughout the community, including the potential for expansion in its current location. The first step in the process was to project the future equipment and space needs for the Public Works Department. In addition to a location for the garage itself, space for a sand/salt storage building and secured, outdoor storage area were foremost in consideration. Before looking at available sites, we established a list of criteria which identified desirable site characteristics for the proposed facility. Following is the list of criteria: A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore ,~ g . . Re: Proposed Public Works :facili ty Conditional Use Permit 5 July 1990 a. Buildable soil b. Minimum 5-7 acres c. Access via year round nine ton road d. Minimal surrounding residential development e. Relatively level f. Central location (middle one-third of City) g. Turnaround room for tractor trailer rig h. Room for employee/visitor parking i. Area for mixing salt/sand A map of undeveloped (or underdeveloped) three sites were examined more closely. as to which cf the sites best satisfied chosen is shown on Exhibit A, attached. parcels, shown as A and B. properties was reviewed, from which The staff then made a recommendation the site criteria list. The location The site consists ,of two separate The Council agreed with the staff's recommendation and ordered appraisals for the two parcels, after which an agreement was reached to buy an option on Parcel A. The ultlmate purchase of the property is dependent on the outcome of the conditional use permit process required for government facilities in residential zoning districts. Attempts to buy an option on Parcel B have failed thus far. The owner is not interested in selling his property to the City and apparently objects philosophically to a public works facility in that location. The subject site is currently zoned R-2A, Single and Two-Family Residential. Parcel A is occupied by the owner's home and contains 7.35 acres. The City has agreed to buy all but 69,190 square feet of the property with the house on it. Parcel B is also occupied by the owner's home and contains 6.8 acres. Since the home is located further back on the lot the City proposes to acquire the entire parcel. Land use and zoning surrounding the site are as follows: north - Hennepin County Railway Authority r.o.w., then single-family residential in Tonka Bay east - two-family dwellings (3); zoned R-2A south - County Road 19, then commercial and Badger Field; zoned C-3 and R-1C, respectively west - commercial in Tonka Bay ISSUES AND ANALYSIS The plans for the public works facility are still in the preliminary stages. The purpose of this review is to present conceptual plans for review by the community and identify issues which should be addressed in later final design stages. - 2 - . . Re: Proposed Public Works Facility Conditional Use Permit 6 July 1990, Following is a brief summary of how the subject site compares to the list of site criteria: 1. Soil. After tne experience with the current facilities on Badger Field (formerly wetland area), buildable soil is of utmost concern. The soil on the subject property satisfies this requirement. 2. Size. The total area of the two parcels is 12.57 acres, of which a small area in the northwest corner is designated wetland. While this is larger than what was identified in the original criteria, several issues identified in Council workshops suggest that more than six acres will be necessary in the future. First there is considerable uncertainty regarding the future of composting in the metro area. Recent discussions suggested that two or more acres may be needed in each community. Another use fo~ the site may be for the City's annual spring cleanup. As Freeman Park becomes more and more developed, it becomes unsuitable as a temporary dump site. It is felt that the subject property could be used for this purpose in the future. Finally, there is the potential for increased sharing of equipment between the south shore communities. Interest has already been expressed in sharing a salt/sand building. 3. Access. Only State Highway 7, County Road 19 and Mill street are open to nine ton loading year round. 4. Surrounding development. Only three, two-family dwellings back up to the subject property. Given the size of the site, ample opportunity exists for creating a significant landscape buffer between the public works facility and the homes. 5. Grade. Although the site sits high and then drops off to the north, there is a fairly large area to accommodate buildings and yard space. Most of the vegetation on the site is on the northern third of the property. As such the upper portions of the site can be graded to suit our needs. 6. Central location. While proximity to City Hall was not part of the criteria for the site, it should be considered a plus. The proposed location is almost the very center of Shorewood. 7. Turnaround room and parking. The site easily accommodates truck traffic as well as employee/visitor parking. 8. Salt/sand storage. Ample room exists for both a storage building as well as an area for mixing. - 3 - . . Re: Proposed Public Works Facility Conditional Use Permit 6 July 1990 Exhibit C is a concept plan for the proposed public works site. It is not to be considered the final site plan, but rather it attempts to illustrate that the site is usable for the intended purpose. Key elements of the plan, regardless of the exact final design are as follows: A. Screening and Landscaping. Although not specified by the Zoning Ordinance, it is recommended that a minimum 50 foot setback be maintained along the east side of the site. It is strongly recommended that an earth berm be constructed within that space and that it be heavily landscaped. It is suggested that this be one of the first things done to prepare the site. Since it is anticipated that the property won't be developed for a few years, trees planted now would be an effective screen by the time the facility was finished. B. Maintenance Gar~ge. While an architect will ultimately design the building, it is suggested that the structure itself become part of the buffer between the maintenance yard and residential property to the east. It is important to remember that the City adopted construction standards for nonresidential buildings in 1985 which precludes construction of pole barn type structures. Neighboring property owners should be assured that the City will live up to its own standards. C. Future Expansion. The site is large enough to accommodate future needs unanticipated at this time. RECOMMENDATION Since the present plans are only conceptual, the decision to be made at this time is one of land use compatibility and site suitability. If the elements suggested above are incorporated into the final plans, the site is considered to be the best one available to suit the future needs of the Shorewood Public Works Department. BJN:ph cc: Larry Whittaker Glenn Froberg Jim Norton Don Zdrazil Leroy Bishop John Cross - 4 - - .... . -: : : .... :::: {.:: ~ ......... A f) .: : .':.. . .... . AlWID) ~lW~ID) 1f8(Q) ~~ . o (31) TRACf " (68) g PARI OF lor J ( 4) 0:; :ll "H .....:,1' :;? .... o S ~ - ~v b ~ Si ~ l< r---,Si7S---- '- ~ i~ c..-t ..--(~ .' ~ , . /'........~........, . ~........ ..nO.a2 :~1 -'-'~ lag:w :--~ -- - , , . , , , , , . . . . , . ) ...... "l~.a............ (32) i .....ll...... .35 R , I I r' t ~I ",.: : . ,-,: ( <.~.::.. I';~ Ii: (10) i 1 . : 25 I .ii::;' : (8) L.._....--~--,00-- I ,:,' (. I' : ,\00 : 'it .' I" J I') 'l".' r- ,.!,' ~: (. rj~" : 'I t I ~. '" Y (5') (".",,!' (5) I~'~/':,': 6:: '::J{ .: to,: t :A t I (7) :'.), II) : '.~' l (f ! ,,.p.l _I, ! (4) , \ \ . IJ ..,~'91.t - , " ~,~t~.~'<';l'vb\\&:~uul1or}htl :: j:'..c. \+'4 -/ ~~"f . cl ~~e.(' 'Fill (1/ /11. '" 1\' --J , I 'l .- QUflU' I .--~ " -- ~-JJ / ' .....,. -1/ . ...., ) !/ 'I (3) l61 lO ~ ~, 1 (~J , , . , . . . . , . , , . , . . . , , . , , . . , , "1 (7) \ . . i...........h...~n... .J: : '//,: : . . , . , , .... I I "- : : . ' ( I): i . . . . , . , . . , : I '" w ex: ~ .~ N 1<0 .5/:7: r; :'" :'; { ..2..6.9a......... ld.91 ;1:' ~IJt J:;4.6~ . Wi ,.9. " SI 5 ~ (22) J (37) ~~ Exhibit A SITE LOCATION Proposed Public Works Site '0 . '7'0" ~... ~ FFi I. IOO~ \. . ~ J ~ ~ .; 1= \() " Exhibit B SITE CH ARACTERISTICS ? /;. O'l~... . ~ '\ ~........, ., ? kxcelsiol", M N 55331 JUL I 3 1990 July 9, 1990 Re: Landscaping plan for Kuempel Clock Co. Dear Bradley: . As we discussed, on the phone last week, I am very disappointed to hear you say that the city of Shorewood has decided that nothing will be required to cover the unpainted concrete block wall on the south side of the building. I feel that I have been misinformed by the City, and that something should be done to break up the sight of this 100 ft. long by 15 ft. high wall in a.R-1 zoned area for the following reasons: . 1. When the building permit ,vas issued, I was not notified of the meeting for a variance. I was told by the City that Sandy made a mistake. 2. When the building construction started, Your office couldn't . find the plans, but assured me that it wouldn't look like a city alley. . I also called Jan Haugen, and she was of the impression that landscaping would take care of the problem. 3. When the meeting for'a variance was held last year, we were again assured that trees would be planted along the south wall. 4. Last week you told me that nothing would be done because nothing would grow in the shade. I called Shorewood Nursery, and was assured that American pyrimidal would do very well under these conditions. This area has partial sunli9ht from noon to three o'cloc~ P.M. and full sunlight fram three o'clock P.M. to eight o'clock P.M. (sundo,vn). - This is residential property. I should not be expected to maintain . trees to cover this unsightly building, as you suggested. Please advise me of what can be done. . .- Yours truly, 1~//7;l.iJ~ Konrad M. Wurm ~ . ...~....@c II I '.,:::::: i e u ar . ........ 0 @ ..... . ........ rle . c-(C p ()(~ 2515 24th Avenue, Minneapolis. MN 55406 (612) 721-1660 The Mobile Telephone Company July 10, 1990 City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Attn: Mr. Bradley Nielsen RE: Replacement of Antenna Facilities on Water tower Dear Mr. Nielsen: According to the Construction/Lease Agreement, Cellular One was to install on the Shorewood water tower antennas with the model number Db 833. Within the past two months, Cellular One has become aware of a manufacturers defect which causes failure in this particular antenna. According to the manufacturer, the particular defect is not correctable. Therefore, we found ourselves replacing numerous antennas throughout our system. As per the Construction/Lease Agreement paragraph 5) entitled Installation of Equipment and Leasehold Improvements; Access; Utilities, subparagraph (01). Cellular One is entitled to replace the Antenna Facilities with the written approval of the Landlord. There- fore, we are hereby requesting the City of Shorewood to allow us to replace the Db 833 antennas with the following types of antennas: BCD 80010 PO 1132 Please find attached photographs and specification sheets for your Information. Also ,in accordance with the lease, the original six (6) antennas will be replaced with two each of the models listed above for a total of four (4) antennas. Furtermore, we will not be placing any of these new model antennas on the stem of the tower. However, it may in the future be necessary to mount a panel antenna at the stem location. Therefore, we are reserving the prior approval right to attach antennas at the approved stem location. All of the .new model antennas will be mounted on top of the water tower. Please ::it- tl . . see the enclosed drawing for the placement of the new antennas. Outside of this change to the types and placement of antennas, all other terms and conditions as setforth in the Construction/Lease Agreement shall remain the same. Since this cell site is currently under construction and the mounting of the antennas was scheduled for completion by the 18th, we hereby request the City of Shorewood to give this matter their earliest attention. If any additional material is needed to make your evaluation please let "me know. I can be reached at 721-1660. Very truly Cellular One ;J~~~ Warren Dunlap r ~""::"P>;.'-' ".- ~t~~~~~':":~ .: ".' /J.u.LJ m "tH"-+ ~~ ~~6-. /O~I-/Orl . . ;,.;; -' ~,:~ . ANTENNAS It TOTAL (4) ~\ ~ O. (Y-AXIS)~i>~'\ d O. (Z-AXIS). ~ I ~ f- \ EXIST HANDRAIL (9) L2x2xl/4 OR CABLE SUPPORT. : AT MAX 4'-0' OIC SEE ffi I ~\ 41 ROOF ANTENNAS (l) ORIENT A TION 1 I I I I I I \ \1 I I I I I .I 1 1" 1 ,.1 . . I,H)1 . .~_~~)#ttr t\ (6) 2 1/2' ~ PIPE x 2' L SEE CD ~___r..~'.:_ - ..:.....~~"'l'!.......~_. :"--~':':':;';'::_.-.:_.__ . . . ,;:;....;.-...- ---~.:..""". Ar< ; :L- 'NICE BAND - HIGH GAIN CYLINDRICAL SC:J Sc~IES OMNIDIRECTiONAL ANTENNAS 100 ;'v1Hz Bandwidth 10 dBd Gain The BCD-series antennas offer excellent pattern control as the result of each dipole being separately fed. The BCD. series is available in several beamtilt and null fill con- figurations. ~.'~" , ; .; , .~ ~ ~ ::,,-4 .-'-A , .~ . ~ Material Specification and Construction Radiating Elerr:3r. ~ Aluminum Alloy r=eeding System Aluminum Extrusion & Brass. Each dipole separately fed, providing effective pattern control. No coaxial cable is used. This con- cept assures very low power losses and eliminates problem with moisture absorba. tlon inside the cable that over time may reduce the signal. Radome Glass fiber reinforced high temp. Polyester. Layers In both X and Y axis. Wall thickness .10'" (2.5 mm). High gloss 2.part gray Polyurethane paint. Custom colors available on request. Finish provides added protection against UV radiation and air contamination. At the top a cone shaped Delrin plug extends inside radome, fully sealed against water seepage. 3uecort ?Iee -::. :.:-:;":;0 mml High strength aluminum alloy. .39" (10 mm) wall thickness. 19.7- (500 mm) long. Yellow cnromated to prevent oxidation. The section of the pipe that extends inside the radome also has durable waterproof seal. A breath- ing hole to remove vapor Inside radome is located in recessed connecter plate. Model # BCD 80010 800-900 MHz Model # BCD 87010 870-970 MHz Radiation-pattern (At mid-band) :2=~. . . ;:-~~-- .~ -~.~,." ~(': -G~::;"'.:'i lert:csl Electrical Specifications Model No. Frequency Bandwidth Gain BCD 80010 800-900 MHz 100 MHz 10 dBd (typ.) BCD 87010 870-970 MHz 100 MHz 10 dBd (typ.) Impedance: 50 ohms '1SWP.: 1.43:1 (Max. over full 100 MHz bandwidth) less than 1.3:1 typical Half Power Ang:e H-plane: 3600 E-plane: 60 Polarization: Vertical Power Ratin;;: 500 W with type N female connector or 1000W with 7/16 or 2000W with EIA 7/8 connector Connector (fer.::.:;;': Type N or 7/16 or EtA 7/8 3eamtilt: 1.250 :I: 0.20 Available Options: 2.50, 50, 60 and go Nullfill: 5%. Other % on request Lightning Protection: Direct ground Mechanical Specifications VSWR Vs. Frequency (Ref. to 500) Length BCD 80010 133 In. . (3375 mm) BCD 87010 130 In. (3300 mm) Diameter BCD 80010 2.8 In. 65mm) BCD 87010 2.8 In. 65mm) 'Height BCD 80010 31 Lbs (14 Kg) BCD 87010 29 Lbs (13 Kg) 'Nlnd Loaclng ~rea BCD 80010 2.60 IlZ (0.24 mZ) BCD 87010 2.15 ItZ (0.22 mZ) ~:llar31 T~ru~t ~t 50 "';$ ~1":: ,i1:nt ".'flnd '.''llce::"/ BCe 80010 68 Lbs (295 N) BCD 87010 82 Lbs (270 N) VSWR 2.0 .3 .3 .7 .5 .5 .~ .3 .2 . " ..v 300 310 ". 360 ~.1Hz 385 900 \ I \ l~~ " . ~ ~ i" EfA -:;. (1 329 SlANOARO P01136 ! i P01132 MiU:' , . . ~., I' ::":Lr' j : ..~~.~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ EIA ~ (1 329 S1 AHOARD ~:r .,1 -- ~ .. I.! [ " r:i; ~l P010021 P01132-0 Unidirectional Collinear Antenna ~~l.:~~'~;'{:'.~~ ~:-,,;,~"~" ~'" '~~~,~~~. __~ 10.5 dB Forward Gain, Collinear 17.0 & 8.0 dB Gain, Collinear 17.0 dB Forward Gain, Collinear 17.0 dB Forward Gain, Collinear 806-960 MHz" PD1136 PD10021 PD1132 PD1132-D 'Exact frequency must be specified. This series of four collinear antenna arrays is designed to meet various sector coverage requirements for mobile radio services in the 806-960 MHz bands. All of the antennas feature durable copper alloy radiating elements encased in a weather-proof fiberglass housing which is joined to a sturdy reflector assembly of high strength aluminum. The PD1132, PD1136 and PD1 0021 can be ultilized for top or sidemounted applications where as the PD1132-D is designed for sidemounting. . A pressurization option (PD1252) is available for all the above facilitating pressurization of the antenna to 12 PSIG, terminating in a 7/8 inch E.I.A. flange. These antennas may be mounted inverted, specify option PD1254. The PD1132-D Dual Directional Antenna was designed to provide dual independent directional coverage with space conservative mounting. Comprised of two separate directional antennas welded to a common support; the PD1132-D features six standard frequency bands within its 806-960 MHz frequency range. The 825-890 MHz frequency band covers the entire wi reline and non-wireline cellular system bands. Three PD1132-D antennas may be arranged combining six independent 600 horizontal beamwidths to yield 3600 diversity coverage. The PD10021 is a uniquely designed Dual Array Directional antenna configuration specifically for applications where limited gain (8 dB) is required on transmit and higher gain (17.0 dB) on the receive side. The dual array features 30 dB vertical isolation between antennas. The radiating elements utilized in the PD10021 are similar to the PD10040 in combination with the PD1132, each with their own termination. Hortlzontal Pattern o P01132andP01132-D C E ~W~WE! u.s. saler.,' Rou,te 79. Marlboro. NJ 07746. Tel. (201) 462-1880 .TetelC 4944313 CEL NJ Hwy. 44 West, P.O. Box 389. LeesbUrg. FL 32149-0389. Tel. (904) 787-9200 '15 Eas1 Watkins Street. Pnoenix. AZ 85004-2925 · Tel. (602) 252-8058 941 North Plum Grove Road. Suite B. ScnaumbUrg.IL 60195. Tel. (312) 843-7511 In Europe: Frfll8SVfll3) OK-3400, HiIlerctd. Oenmar1< . Tel, (02) 26 36 36. Telex 42164 eEL OK 108 ::,':fl '~f . t I l 06 tlCI' 960 1000 ,.nl% -4 .' . . !,~ Horizontal Pattern P01oo21 0 I.OdB . 17.0dB 270' Gain YS. Frequency P01OO21. 8.OdB . 17.0dB 20 .. 10 o -50 -30 Fa MHz +30 +60 VSWR YS. Frequencyp010021 . 8.OdB II 17.?dB 1.1, ISl 11' 40 -20 Fo MHz +20 +40 Horizontal Pattern o POl136 Gain va. Frequency 11 . P01132, POl132-0 . POl131 .. 'Q ~- U IIIUII t;:\,; lIUllal Collinear Antenn. Continued ,,-. .. .._] Electrical Speclflcallons Frequency Range-MHz Gain-dB Bandwidth-MHz for 1.5:1 VSWR Standard Bandwidths-MHz HOrizontal Beamwidth (1/2 Power Points) Vertical Beamwldth (1/2 Power Points) Maximum Power Input-WatlS Front-Io-Back Ratio-dB Isolation. Min. Ant.-Anl. dB Lightning Protection Termination-Oirect (Fixed) P01136 P010021 P01132 S06-96O 10.5 17.0 & 8,0 17,0 17,0 60 60 60 60 806-866. 820-880. 825-890. 860-920. 900-960 P01132-0 13()O 60. 8. (17 dB Gain) 54. (S.OdBGain) S. 500 500 25 25 30 N/A Oirect Ground Type-N (Female) lS in, (457 mm) RG393/U Flexible Cable with Type-N (M) Connectors Attached. 60. 600 8. 80 500 20 N/A 500 25 45 Flexible Extension-(Supplied) Note: All VSWR data referenced to 50 ohms. PO'136 P010021 P01132 P01132-D 11 (3.35) 12,7 (3.S6) 11.5 (3.51) 12.5 (3.S1) 9 (2.29) S.7 (2.67) 8,7 (2.67) 8.7 (2.67) 2-3/4 (70) 2-3/8 (60) 2-3/8 (60) 2-3/8 (60) 11 (279) 16 (406) 16(406) 16 (406) 112 (2845) 126 (3200) 112 (2845) 110 (2794) 38 (17,3) 70 (31,8) 60 (27,3) 105 (47,7) Copper Copper (8,OdB - Alum,) Copper Copper Fiberglass 6061- T6 Aluminum 6061- T6 Aluminum 3,68 (,342) 6.13 (.570) 5,50 (.511) 9,88 (,918) 100 (161) 100(161) 100 (161) 100 (161) 147 (66,8) 245 (111) 220 (100) 395 (180) 635 (94) N/ A Side Mount N/A N/ A Side Mount, 82 (11.4) 174 (24,1) 155 (21,5) 122 (16.9) P046 (Bottom) PD46 Clamp Set P089 (Top) PD89 Top Support for Side Mounting P01oo64 Wall Mounting Hardware (3 Required) 65 (29,5) 105 (47.6) 95 (43.1) 175 (79.4) 13 (.37) 41 (1,2) 17,1 (,49) 41 (1.2) Common Carrier .. VSWR va. Frequency 2:1 . POl132, POl132-0 and POl138 17 dB 1.5:1 MechanIcal Speclflcallons Overall Length-ft. (m) Element Housing Length-ft. (m) Support Pipe Oiameter-in, (mm) Reflector Size Width-in. (mm) Height-in. (mm) Weight-Ibs. (kg) Radiating Element Material Element Housing Material Reflector Material Support Pipe Material Wind Loading Area (tlat plate equivalent)-ft.2 (m2) Rated Wind Velocity (-MPH (km/hr) Lateral Thrust at Rated Wind -Ibs. (kg) Bending moment 1 in, (25 mm) Below top of Support Pipe @ rated wind-It. Ibs, (kg m) Torsional Moment@ rated- wind with Std. Mounting -ft. Ibs, (kg m) Mounting Hardware-(Supplied) Mounting Hardware-(Options) P01132and PD10021 Shipping Weight-Ibs. (kg) Shipping Volume-tV (m3) Shipping Mode ~~-~...-~ .~....~~. ::. . ." :':-'--:~..:~~.,;-: -- .... ~':;::~:;~i;" ",~: '. ' ---....~.--_...-....;...,~~ ---......-.... .;..'---. -.~.. , .:.... ',~ : -'.. . . ~ ~ ___.' .' -'- . ,I J,: ._-.;c. -.. ._-~.__._-_....__..'-~.....r -'; _.- : :'h:: _ :. ~,,"- <~ ~. .:::-., :.:.:'. :~ . 'JrJ~ " -". ,., ':. -.-'. . .' ..-. -'~:.'lf", , ",'..;-. ......::-.--_~;/;...:k:'l:.~;:;>.;_::.::.-:.. ~ .-_ :: I - . .-~"'~-:":.:. .!;<-~'~'>~,'~:"'.:' ,.~~~-~_.. . .r-------.- ..-. . .. .....- : " .. :.-~_.........-~- . J .' , -- -~:- ,;:- -:' ~ ~ ,.....;, -~ .... " .' ;.';. . - '. -.... .~ :"._ :C' .'_~; .4"-~",'~~' -,. , .. .- . flitlll 1~~fjl(1 - '.-- r:_. .-'. .... ~-::t.: ;'.'-.....-......;, --"'.' ....... .; "r-:::.:-:" ""-.. ~., ~i ...~.;,'- ... ,'. --j. ... ; .. -. '- ~ ~------~ ... ."""r...... -:...--'- .~~.::-. :-:~;-~~: '.,--.~'.-:~r. ~." ',~- . :;....: "r '" ~.J~. f;<;o.4 .k.-.:. ,."'...~_....... 11\ \) . . LIQUOR ACT ~ 340A.504 Subd. 3. I~toxieating liquor; Sunday sales; ; on-sale: (a) A restaurant, club, bowling' center, or hotel with a seating capacity for at least 30 persons and which holds an on-sale. intoxicating liquor license may sell intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 12:00 noon on Sundays and 1:00 ( a.m. on Mondays.. ;.. . .., . ' ";"':: '. ..,. " ...'. (b) The governing body"of a municipality rriay-'after one public' hearing by 'ordinance permit a restaurant, hotel, bowling center, or club to sell intoxicating liquor for consum~ tion on the premises in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 10:00 a.m; on Sundays and 1:00 a.m. on Mondays, provided that the licensee is in conformance with. the Minnesota clean air act.! " '.. ' ' , . :. '. . . ".. .... .1. ...." .' (c) An establishment serving intoxicating liquor on Sundays must. obtain a Sunday license. The license must be issued by the governing body of the municipality for .a period of one year, and the fee for the license may not exceed $200.->' .' ..., . ::~ SUNDAY SALES OF LIQUOR STATE STATUTE " (If , " A1~ e~ ~ P. O. BOX 360 EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 Assn., Inc. . " Office: 612-474-5222 Golf Shop: 474-9571 JUL I 0 19"~ July 10, 1990 C~ty of Shorewood p. tt: !-is Sandra Kennelly Countrv Club Road Shorewood, rill. 55331 - Gentlemen: ~eferring to our phone conversation of today we are requesting that the City of Shorewood pass an ordinance to update it lBWS concernin~ the servin~ of liquor, pertainin~ to.the hours durin~ which liquor may be served. The State of Minnesota amended its law and increased the number of hours liquor may be served on Sunday, from neon until midni~ht, to 10:00AM until 1:00AM Monday. In any event, if the laws of the City of Shorewood were the same as those of the State of Minnesota there would be no conflict in observance possible. Our Sunday traffic is very nominal, we normally do not open for Dinner but there are a few special parties that occur on Sunday evenin~ and we would like the additional servin~ time to avoid crowdin~ our ~uests. T~a~k you for your help in this ~atter. Yours truly, Minnetonka Country 01ub Assn. Inc. ~~Z B. Witrak, Pres. bw.xz ,t-\ ') . . CONSUMER PROTECfION-TOBACCO VENDING ". . MACHINES-LOCATIONS . :.... o' .,. . . ~ .. . ~. :'~ ..' , .. . f ". . ; ,'k..:" . ", CHAPTER 421 H.F. No. 2042 .' ~:: .:~ i : . ~ . ", I. '.' ~ . ..... ", . AN ACT relating to consumer protection; limiting the locations in which .sales of tobacco by vending machine may be made; proposlng coding for new law in Minnesota Statuteg, chapter 325E. . , ;..,. ~ . , . . o. >.'. an an ... ---......-......-- Subd.3. . LOCAL REGULATION. ''The ~overning body of a local unit of government ma . ado t rules or ordinances relatin to vendin machine sales of tobacco that are more restrictive than the restrlctIQ.ns Impose y this section.' :'." :.:.': ":. .' ::L .' . .~,Prese~tedtotheg~ve~ofApri15,1990. '., ... ...., ; ...::: ,'. ..... . : Approved .April 9, 1990. . " .....'..i.> . ""i. "::'.: " " ~;' .' '. .. !... .J .~.' ~,>: ~ :':-: ..\ ::~;.' . . ".': .... CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINES STATE STATUTE EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1990 /q . . -..... I'--'''-'''-'~'''''-~-'''-''--' -_._.~.._..--_....'-', i ! I , -j I SHOREWOOD MEMO: DATE: i-Iq-~O TO: r-A "'~ 0 r ~" d C", t'/ C o"'l"(j i \ FROM: BrAd. N',e I~er"\ Th..e.- ~t~t-r Y"e.p~rt -Fot""" '1+-t.W\. I e, C, - l. 0 r'\. "1 c>v or :2 2> j~ l~ qO d.jLl'\do.. \.v\ \ \ ~ ~rd ,,~J.ef""' ~e.rA~O.:t.e. 'A::'>~ ~ '(" . ~ /8, C.- /. 4-. -. . 5J1innesola cJlssociation 0/ Small Cities 611 Iowa Avenue P.O. Box 122 Staples, MN 56479 (218) 894-3278 JUN 25 1990 June 1990 Dear City Officials; Enclosed you will find a dues statement to join the Minnesota Association of Small Cities, for 1990/1991. You will also find a brochure telling you a little of what the Association is all about. Please read this brochure over carefully and think seriously about becoming a member of our Association. Those of you who are currently members, we thank you for your continued support. Presently we have 336 member cities and are hoping to increase this number. I am very proud of being the President of the MAOSC. Each Boarn Member and I will continue to work hard for the Small Cities. We hope you have a safe and fun summer. ~J;,!A'~ Gerald O'Donnell President, MAOSC GOD/jk Enclosures Making big things happen for small cities! \8D2- ~ 5J1innesola 1sociation 0/ Small Cit! 611 Iowa Avenue P.O. Box 122 Staples, MN 56479 (218) 894-3278 ANNUAL DUES STATEMENT Invoice for membership dues in the Minnesota Association of Small Cities for July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991.* CITY CLERK CITY OF: ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP BASE: PER PERSON FOR YOUR POPULATION: POP. X .12 = TOTAL: BASE 0 - 500 popul~tion - $ 50.00 per City plus . l2 cents per person 501 - 1000 population - $ 50.00 per City plus .12 cents per person 1001 - 2000 population - $ 65.00 per City plus .12 cents per person 200l - 5000 population - $125.00 per City plus .12 cents per person * Payment from public funds authorized by Mn. Stats. governing City operations and functions. PLEASE REMIT TO: MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SMALL CITIES 611 IOWA AVENUE P.O. BOX 122 STAPLES, MINNESOTA 56479 IF YOU ARE NOW A MEMBER OF THE MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SMALL CITIES, WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT. IF YOU ARE NOT NOW A MEMBER, WE URGE YOU TO JOIN US NOW. THANK YOU! THE MAOSC BOARD OF DIRECTORS Making big things happen for small cities I . What is MAOSC? How does MAOSC serve small cities? What is MAOSC's primary function? Why is there a need for an organization such as MAOSC? How is MAOSC Governed? Does MAOSC employ any staff members? In what other ways does MAOSC represent small cities? Why should your small city join MAOSC? . . An organization, comprised of cities with populations of 5,000 or less, formed to serve the needs of small communities in Minnesota. By serving as a collective voice for small cities before the State Legislature, State agencies and other groups and organizations. To lobby on behalf of small cities, articulating their unique needs and concerns, and to help our lawmakers understand the ramifications - both pro and con - of proposed bills. Although MAOSC works closely on many issues with other city groups, including the League of Minnesota Cities with which it is affiliated, the needs of small cities are unique and often differ from those of other city groups. Without MAOSC, these special concerns might not be addressed. There are eleven regions in the state, and each is represented by a Regional Vice President and Assistant Vice Presidents who serve on MAOSC's Board of Directors. Yes. The association employs an Executive Director, who also serves as lobbyist and editor of SMALL TALK, the association newsletter, and a secretary/treasurer. By providing input to other groups and agencies through participation on a number of committees and organizations such as: - Post Board - MPCA Technical Advisory Committee - Clerks and Finance Officers Association - Intergovernmental Information Systems Advisory Council (IISAC) - Representation on State of Minnesota task forces, including those pertaining to elections, local police protection, budgeting and utility operations. - Representation on a variety of LMC task forces and on the LMC Board. Small cities are strongly affected by what happens at the state and regional level, but individually, they have little power. It is only by working together that we can gain the stature needed to achieve positive results. ,~ CITY OF SHOREWOOD . JOINT PARK COMMISSION/COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 COUNe.CHAMBERS 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 7:00 P.M. "', PROPOSED. . . AGENDA 1. COUNCIL/COMMISSION RELATIONSHIPS A. Park Planning and Engineering B. Role of Liaison C. Role of Commission Recommendations D. Council views of relationship with Commission, and Commission views of relationship with Council and Staff. Authorizing expenses. E. Commission By-laws 2. FINANCING PARK PROJECTS AND MAINTENANCE A. Current Equipment and Maintenance Needs 1 . Mower 2. Seeder, 3. Aerator 4. Picnic tables 5. Badger warming house 6. Benches 7. Dugouts 8. Resurface tennis courts 9. Grills 10. Widening Freeman Park road 11. Soccer fields 12. Trail Plan B. contingencies - $25,000 per year C. Current Reserves D. 1990 Capital projects 1. Irrigation 2. Little League Field 3. Cathcart field relocation and parking lot 4. Silverwood Park improvements and trail 3 . 1991 B UDGErr 4. ~ffiSTER PLANS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 5. ALTERNATIVES FOR FINANCING A. City Budget B. Park Dedication Fees -2- l~t)L\ . . CITY OF SHOREWOOD JOINT PARK AGENDA - AUGUST 14, 1990 PAGE 2 . . COMMISSION/COUNCIL 5. ALTERNATIVES FOR FINANCING - CONTINUED C. Miscellaneous Revenues 1. User Fees - need information on other area Cities 2. Deposits - need information on other area Cities 3. Permits - large groups - need information on other area cities 4. Rental - need information on other area Cities 5. Permits-tournaments - need information on other area Cities 6. Promotional items D. Referendum F. Use of volunteers/Donations 6. POLICY QUESTIONS A. Use of park$ by political groups B. City Scheduling/coordination with Minnetonka Community Services (soccer problems; over booking) C. Consideration/process of community group (Tonka Men's Club) D. Temporary warming house E. Use of Volunteers -2- II i' i'l I, !d .._.~___.~ :1-.--.-----..----.-.--.m.---------.-'""'. .. .. . . Q -tJ -9 0 . ....~..~. .lll.~.-~.-_..- .- -. ~=~_..~...~=.=~.... -_..~- -... .-- ..Ii~.:"'~-~ .0 (lE1,~s -.---.- - .-- --~..._-.-- 1'1@"(\-'-~~.J>.lc= ~~ '. '1>loc.t.-e~-4;-~.-LLrlg~(L.J-fa.--::JJ~-- wi ---<<----..-.----- . _ II! .~_~ee-rto_cJ.LQ.V_CLC-~l- ck - SCc-1:c-~ .. ...... ---f~bocte,J_&P_Q(L~...euero~.-.'b-.~-U7Jg't.D_- .____,~~.4L~_'1~=_.LI.o:l ~....Joc ~~+_llL-:;'d)ewb~ , I: 0""" '.'." Ir", ' (J-' ._ __'_'__1jjr~_.....__t1:_..t5._lXJ~~~~~__-0-C_dClve.~~_l.ud.L_~_.- -~ . --.--- tl~... __..~__.OA1J2s..__.__'dWeckd.- .............---- -...----..--...---.--,~_.- .-.--.--. -..-_.._.._-_........~.....,i....J72~- ..- .~?:-~._-.-._----"..__._-_.--_...-.._-------_.__.- . .-..- ...._.:~ ..~yu . I~. .. ._._.__________UICW N\UL,,,~P\~OC-- . ....____.+>-__l9a'10,"_. _. ~lfY ~-J?I~--...-_.-_...--...-~d--.(aCl.j.s:---roa t"-l.~-0Cce..- .- l!~---------.-- __exe.--l2o.'i:f:l ~A:r-~- -.. ----n-UL61}~ &ch-&.~...--.-~-----.~._-----.-----~ JLLacf:ri_fbdlQ!n, ~--Qk-..--......--- . j' ~. i :: _____._._.._.______._ ____._____:n1L~_C~~-1~- .._.__.~-~u--~.Ajc--- ...___._. ___.p ...____.....__ ___ __ .~._._..__ __SUbmL+kd____b~ :"-'--' ....---------. n_ ___-+,1 (QCW_1baI(L~~QJ~ __._._______~ lY\~~A~jJ~ - Iii tr--..---.------.---.... _~6w,Cx.~- ...__.._._____~;L--f~ . .... __.__.__. . ....___.._.________.__._____.________._~1o--g-3(QJ------..-. __ '.' .------1.t-CQo.l.oS"-- \Y1ck-l.'1 (u. ~ A -eL~. ---...----- I,; ~ ill ~ .----.--~rrZ- .-.z;::--.-.-----.-.-..--------.---~ . .. ..-----tF ... .- -.------.\-------..---O.-J~(~.Uhdjc.\:.er-o_ .--tj~ roa.uL.~-eEa--_.---~-~~--%.... .~W' -.' . f!!- -....-......-......- ._5'J66~~CLdYa.d i Ii ::txK-eu.:n::J-_'~~._~$ 33J .-----....Hl . -----.-------.---. ~ - . .-.-jlf--------. ..... ....- -------.---.--..----~-.----\~-ld-1--- IiI . c. c... ~. . ",' CHECK NO. CHECK APP& LISTING FOR JULY 23, 1990 C.IL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JULY 2, 1990 4705 (L) 4706 (L) 4707 (L) 4708 (L) 4709 (L) 4710 (L) 4711 (L) 4712 (L) 4713 4714 (L) 4715 (L) 4716 (L) 4717 (L) 4718 (L) 4719 (G) 4720 (G) 4721 (G) 4722 (G) 4723 (G) 4724 (G) 4725 (G) 4726 (G) 4727 (G) 4728 (G) 4729 (G) 4730 (G) 4731 (G) 4732 (G) 4733 (L) 4734 (L) 4735 (L) 4736 (L) 4737 (L) 4738 (L) 4739 (L) 4740 (L) 4741 (L) 4742 (L) 4743 (L) 4744 (L) 4745 (L) 4746 (L) 4747 (L) PURPOSE AT & T UTILITIES BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR PURCHASES GRIGGS, COOPER AND COMPANY LIQUOR, WINE AND MISC. PURCHASES JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. LIQUOR AND WINE PURCHASES MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS, INC. BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY, INC. MISC. PURCHASES AND SUPPLIES MN MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSOC.1990-1991 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP HARRY NIEMELA - JULY 1990 RENT FOR STORE I VOID NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. ED PHILLIPS AND SONS POGREBA DISTRIBUTING, CO. QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS RYAN PROPERTIES, INC. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE NORWEST BANK PUB. EMP. RETIREMENT ASSOC ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AFSCME LOCAL, #224 CITY COUNT CREDIT UNION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PUB. EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC VOID COMMERCIAL LIFE INS. CO. MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN MEDCENTERS GROUP HEALTH, INC. BELLBOY CORPORATION BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOB. MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY FRANCK'S TRUCKING GRIGGS, COOPER AND COMPANY JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. MARK VII DISTRIBUTORS, INC. MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY, INC. NORTH STAR ICE POGREBA DISTRIBUTING, INC. QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE WEEKLY NEWS, INC. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) UTILITIES LIQUOR AND WINE PURCHASES BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES LIQUOR AND WINE PURCHASES JULY 1990 RENT FOR STORE II STATE TAX WITHHELD FEDERAL, FICA AND MEDICARE PERA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS UNION DUES PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS EMPLOYEE PERA LIFE INS. EMPLOYEE LIFE INS. FOR JULY 1990 EMPLOYEE ACCIDENT AND SICKNESS EMPllXEE HEALTH INSURANCE EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE LIQUOR PURCHASES CIGARETEPURCHASES AND SUPPLIES MISC. PURCHASES BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES LIQUOR AND WINE PURCHASES LIQUOR, WINE ANDMISC. PURCHASES WINE PURCHASES BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES MISC. PURCHASES AND SUPPLIES MISC. PURCHASES BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES WINE PURCHASES BEER AND MISC. PURCHASES WASTE REMOVAL ADVERTISING -1- AMOUNT $ 1. 26 3,221.15 5,739.65 1,767.01 9,951.50 272.20 310.00 1,428.00 418.01 3,516.11 803.46 943.52 1,922.58 898.62 5,221.21 1,640.50 543.46 104.70 45.00 165.00 27.00 34.00 114.00 3 , 772 . 00 435.80 290.67 2,462.30 2,366.72 610.20 15,760.81 481. 80 3,051. 85 412.58 8,403.87 326.26 716.80 1,701.85 666.78 14,798.70 65.00 256.00 aD ~,' CHECK NO. CHECK APP& LISTING FOR JULY 23, 1990 CeIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS ISSUED SINCE JULY 2, 1990 (CONT.) 4748 4749 4750 4751 4752 4753 4754 4755 4756 (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) (G) MPELRA-PAULA FAUST ST. CLOUD RADISSON HOTEL DAIN BOSWORTH EXCELSIOR SLOW PITCH LEAGUE LEAGUE OF MN CITIES HARDRIVES, INC. PATRICIA HELGESEN DANIEL RANDALL BRADLEY J. NIELSEN MPELRA SUMMER CONF.-L. WHITTAKER $ LODGING FOR MPLERA CONF.-WHITTAKER FINANCIAL SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT OF FREEMAN PK DEPOSIT EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE-JULY 1990 PAYMENT OF VOUCHER NO.3 AND FINAL SECTION 125 DEPENDENT CARE REIMB. SECTION 125 HEALTH CARE REIMB. SECTION 125 DEPENDENT CARE REIMB. TOTAL GENERAL TOTAL LIQUOR TOTAL CHECKS ISSUED -2- 95.00 68.00 6.38 200.00 381. 14 10,718.02 420.00 199.00 130.00 25,509.50 82,375.97 107,885.47 CHECK NO. CHECK APAAL LISTING FOR JULY 23, 1990 ACIL MEETING TO WHOM ISSUED PURPOSE AMOUNT CHECKS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 4757 4758 4759 4760 4761 4762 4763 4764 4765 4766 4767 4768 4769 4770 4771 4772 4773 4774 4775 4776 4777 4778 4779 4780 4781 4782 4783 4784 4785 4786 4787 4788 4789 4790 4791 4792 4793 4794 4795 4796 4797 4798 AVR, INC. CONCRETE AND DELIVERY CHARGE $ AIRSIGNAL, INC. BEEPERS FOR PUBLIC WORKS AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK INTEREST ON GO IMP 10-01-89 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK INTEREST ON GO IMP 4-1-87 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS FOR PARKS BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. BALLFIELD AGG AND ROCK FOR STREETS CARVER HEATING AND AC, INC. AIR CONDITIONING REPAIR-CITY HALL COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY ROCK FOR STREETS COMMERS CONDo WATER COMPANY WATER COOLER RENTAL CHAPEL CONSULTING, INC. COMPUTER NEG. & PLANNING ASSISTANCE DEM-CON LANDFILL, INC. DUMPING FEE FOR 20820 IDLEWILD PATH FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. DEMURRAGE CHARGE HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS LICENSE HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERVo RECONDITION AND TEST 1 WALKER JACK KAR PRODUCTS SHOP SUPPLIES LANO EQUIPMENT, INC. SICKEL AND FREIGHT LYMAN LUMBER SIDING AND SAKRETE MIX HC MAYER AND SONS, INC. DIESEL FUEL METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM. JUNE SAC CHARGES METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM. SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR AUGUST MIDWEST ASPHALT COMPANY HOT MIX AND TACK OIL MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMPUTER PAPER WM MUELLER AND SONS, INC. WASHED SAND FOR CRESCENT BEACH NAVARRE TRUE VALUE WATER, SHOP AND PARK SUPPLIES NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. UTILITIES NORWEST BANK MN., N.A. SEMI-ANNUAL FEE ON GO IMP A12-84 NORWEST BANK MN., N.A. INTEREST AND FEE ON GO IMP A8-1-86 ORR, SCHELEN, MAYERON MISC. ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR MAY JOSEPH PAZANDAK MILEAGE AND FILM/PROCESSING PEPSI-COLA COMPANY POP PURCHASES IN JULY PEPSI-COLA COMPANY POP MACHINE RENTAL FOR AUGUST PITNEY BOWES, INC. POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 8/16-11/15/90 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE HAUL TREE DEBRIS KATIE SNYDER COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SO. LAKE MTKA PUB. SAFETY JULY CONTRACT AND APR-JUN OT & EXP. STERLING FENCE, INC. CHAIN LINK FENCE AND POSTS TONKA AUTO AND BODY SUPPLY TRUCK SUPPLIES TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES INSPECTION NOTICES TWIN CITIES STAMP & PRINT. NAMEPLATES FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES WITT FINANCIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES YOUNGSTEDTS, INC. UNLEADED GASOLINE PURCHASES TOTAL CHECKS FOR APPROVAL TOTAL CHECK APPROVAL LIST -3- 109.75 9.00 32,696.25 19,952.50 549.22 735.95 132.00 3,831.76 22.50 1,000.00 22.00 45.00 84.00 589.27 256.92 122.65 32.00 610.91 4,752.00 22,793.64 965.06 62.02 25.30 122. 13 557.54 200.00 29,108.75 1,040.79 89.24 43.15 10.00 63.75 170.00 150.00 29,875.20 296.00 60.95 142.45 31.15 214.26 56.96 75.21 151,707.23 259,592.70 CHECK APP.AL LISTING FOR JULY 23, 1990 ~CIL MEETING CHECK NO. TO WHOM ISSUED HOURS AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER FOR JULY 18, 1990 PAYROLL 204215 VOID 204216 (G) LAURENCE WHITTAKER 80 REG HOURS $ 1,031.79 204217 (G) SANDRA KENNELLY 80 REG HOURS 756.13 204218 (G) SUSAN NICCUM 80 REG HOURS 598.97 204219 (G) ANNE LATTER 80 REG HOURS 432.59 204220 (G) ALAN ROLEK 80 REG HOURS 928.57 204221 (G) WENDY DAVIS 80 REG HOURS 570.97 204222 (G) BRADLEY NIELSEN 80 REG HOURS 835.83 204223 (G) PATRICIA HELGESEN 64 REG HOURS 409.10 204224 (G) JOSEPH PAZANDAK 80 REG HOURS 813.43 204225 (G) CHARLES DAVIS 80 REG HOURS 431.47 204226 (G) DENNIS JOHNSON 82 REG HOURS 710.01 204227 (G) DANIEL RANDALL 80 REG HOURS 702.33 204228 (G) HOWARD STARK 82 REG HOURS 576.68 204229 (G) RALPH WEHLE 80 REG HOURS 561. 61 ' 204230 (G) DONALD ZDRAZIL 80 REG HOURS 1,004.46 204231 (G) JOSEPH LUGOWSKI 80 REG HOURS 696.48 204232 (G) TODD LATTERNER 72 REG HOURS - 3 OT 579.24 204233 (G) LAWRENCE NrccUM 80 REG HOURS 546.39 204234 (L) RUSSELL MARRON 40 REG HOURS 188.84 204235 (L) CHRISTOPHER SCHMID 80 REG HOURS 430.05 204236 (L) BRIAN JAKEL 56 REG HOURS 251.71 204237 (L) MARK KARSTEN 52.5 REG HOURS 211. 55 204238 (L) WILLIAM JOSEPHSON 80 REG HOURS 598.00 204239 (L) SUSAN LATTERNER 30 REG HOURS 139.25 204240 (L) DEAN YOUNG 80 REG HOURS 551. 76 204241 (L) SCOTT BARTLETT 20.5 REG HOURS 111.12 204242 (L) DAVID PETERSON 17 REG HOURS 77 .99 204243 (L) KELLY MICHELSON 21.5 REG HOURS 96.14 204244 (L) KEVIN FOSS 15.5 REG HOURS 79.43 204245 (L) JOHN FRUTH 18.5 REG HOURS 84.05 204246 (L) NOEL NICHOLS 18.5 REG HOURS 84.05 204247 (L) CRAIG SCHOLLE 20.5 REG HOURS 92.10 204248 (L) ERICA SHAW 21 REG HOURS 86.79 TOTAL GENERAL 12,186.05 TOTAL LIQUOR 3,082.83 TOTAL PAYROLL 15,268.88 -4-