102488 CC Reg AgP
a:, .~
'"
-.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1988
AGENDA
ROLL CALL
A.
Pledge of Allegiance
B.
Roll Call
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
Gagne
Brancel
Mayor Rascop
Haugen
Stover
t'1'.;;;O
~
A. Regular Council Meeting - october 11, 1988
(Att.No.lA-Minutes)
B.. Special Council Meeting - October 4 , 1988
County Road 19-Glen Road Drainage
(Att.No.lB-Minutes)
C. Special Council Meeting -October 12,1988
Finance Director Interviews
2 . MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
A.
^(JfJ-
B.
3. COMMISSION REPORTS
A. Planning Conunission
B. Park Comnlission
4. CONSENT AGENDA
A.
Acceptance of. Improvements:
R~~i1nJ /31
Addition-Street
Rf)Sn, IA -r7 o-J I 3
Improvement .~
1. Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 9th
Improvement
2 MGKin1ey Place 2nd Addition-Street
-1-
.
..
'" ,
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1988
PAGE 2
4.
CONSENT AGENDA-Continued
3.
~ (XM.Tltni
MCKinley Place 3rd Addition-Street Improvement
~OUA-r1f51i
Sweetwater at Near Mountain-2nd Addition-Sanitary
Watermain and Storm Sewer
,0\j
4.
lY\.l
sewer
B.
Acceptance of Insurance
(Att. NO ..4A-Requests)
J9 -- OLM.-Tf hi\~5Y
Proposal .. ~ ~ .
(Att.No.4B-Memo)
C.
Finalize Finance Director Hiring
(Att.No.4C-Staff Report)
f!!..esOvlA"f1 0 Aj \~l
Appointrnent.of General Election Judges
(Att.No.4D-List of Judges)
D.
Moved .
Seconded
Vote
5.
FINAL PLAT-TRACY ADDITION
~
\)~
Applicant: Jim Bruce for Ron Tracy
Location: 5610 Covington Road
(Att.NO.5A-Staff Report,
5B~Engineer Report)
6. REQUEST FOR REZONING.- KUEMPEL CHIME
Applicant: Mrs. Audry McGregor
Location: 21195 Minnetonka Blvd
(Att.No.6-Staff Report)
7. MOVING PERMIT.DISCUSSION - Leo Meloche
Location:
26120 Birch Bluff Road
8. STAFF REPORTS
A. Attorneys Report
1.
2.
B. Engineers Report
A. Status Report-Shady Island Bridge
B. Status of Temporary Pump House Building and Sale of
Structure
-2-
...
,
.
..
.
.
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1988
PAGE 3
8. STAFF REPORTS~Continued
C. Planners Report
A.
B.
D. Administrative Reports
A. Discuss Compensatory Time for Salaried Employees
B.
9. COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Mayors Report
1.
2.
B. Council Report
1. Rental Property-Suggested Code for Inspections
2.
10. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT
-3-
r. ·
t'
e=
t
....':
,,,"
.,,-A
--.,
~
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUT~
CALL TO. o.RDER
The Regular Council meeting of the Shorewood City Council was
called to order at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, o.ctober 11, 1988, in the
Council Chambers by Mayor Rascop.
PLEDGE o.F ALLEGIANCE AND PRAYER
Mayor Rascop opened the Regular Council meeting with the Pledge of
Allegiance and a prayer.
Ro.LL CALL
Presen~: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Stover and
Gagne. (Absent: Brancel)
Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer o.smundson, Administrator
Vogt, Planner Nielsen and Clerk Kennelly.
APPRo.VAL OF MINUTES
Gagne moved, S~over seconded, to approve the minutes of the Budget
meeting of September 20, 1988, as written. Motion carried - 4 ayes
(Brancel absent)
Gagne moved, Haugen seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular
Council meeting of September 26, 1988. Motion carried - 4 ayes
Brancel absent)
Co.MMISSION REPo.RTS
Planninq Commission
Stover reported that the Planning Commission reviewed items
7-12 on the Council agenda. Stover will report on the Commis-
sions recommendation as the Council acts upon the request. A
public hearing will be held on November 1, 1988 on gerrymander-
ing lot lines.
Park Commission
Mrs. Clarke, owner of the property at 5075 Suburban Drive, has
asked the Park Commission to consider adding a portion of her
lot to the Manor Park property. Administrator Vogt felt the
water service from Amesbury could be accessed through this lot.
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen to obtain information regarding
this request. Motion carried - 4 ayes.
-1-
//1
r
e
.
~
MINUTES
PAGE 2
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
COMMISSION REPORTS
Park Commission - Continued
John Arnst requested permission to camp over-night with girl-
scouts in Freeman Park. The current Ordinance prohibits over-
night camping and fires.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to approve the request. Motion
was denied. 1 aye (Gagne) to 3 nayes. Mayor Rascop suggested
the use of near by camp grounds providing over-night facilities.
The Southwest Trail Association has offered to groom the trail
system for cross country skiing to alow year round accessible
use. This would better the chances for a park grant.
A request was made for trees to be transplanted from Cathcart Park
to Manor Park and Amesbury water extension restoration. They
would like two large trees transplanted at each location, a
tree spade will cost $75.00 an hour. The cost of transplanting
would be divided between the water project fund and the park fund.
Stover would like the Park Commission to study over-night camp-
ing in the park.
CONSENT AGENDA
1989 Animal Control Contract -
Midwest Animal Control
Resolution No.109-88
A new contract was submitted for approval of the Animal Control
contract for 1989 with Midwest Animal Service, Inc. with a 10%
increase in cost over the 1988 contract for boarding.
1989 BUdget Approval
Resolution No.110-88
The amended budget was submitted for final acceptance for 1989.
All alterations and amendments have been included in the final
draft. The 1989 budget is a 3.4% increase over the 1988 budget.
Payment Voucher-Freeman Park-Project No.87-5
Engineer Norton recommended approval of the 4th and final payment
voucher for Freeman Park-Project 87-5 in the amount of $257.00
to Widmer Inc.
Payment Voucher-S.E. Area Water Tower-Project No.86-1D
Engineer Norton recommended approval of the 7th payment voucher
for the S.E. Area Water Tower-Project 86-1D in the amount of
$14,858.78 to CBI Na-Con, Inc.
-2-
r
~
.
MINUTES - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 3
.
CONSENT AGENDA-Continued
Payment Voucher-Freeman Park-Project No.88-2
Engineer Norton recommended approval of the 2nd payment voucher
for the Freeman Park-watermain and surfacing-Project 88-2 in the
amount of $29,487.70 to T & S Excavating.
Payment Voucher-Sealcoatinq and Overlay-Project No.87-2
Engineer Norton recommended approval of payment voucher 2 and
final for Sealcoating and Overlay Project No.87-2 in the amount
of $6,749.77 to Munn Blacktop, Inc.
Accept Streets-Waterford 2nd Addition
Engineer Norton recommended acceptance of the streets with the
Waterford 2nd addition plat subject to receipt of a one year
maintenance bond.
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen to approve the listed items on
the consent agenda as requested including resolution as needed.
Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes.
METROPOLITAN WASTE COMMISSION - Lift Station Construction
Metro Waste representatives in the areas of community organizing site
controller and the project engineer were present to respond to the
Council's concerns on the Lake virginia Lift Station site.
Mr. Fred Stenborg, site controller, reviewed a site plan and addressed
the three main areas of concern; noise, odor and aesthetics of the
site. He felt their failure to completely explain their construction
plans may have caused the misunderstanding that now exists. He re-
viewed the project procedures and time schedules. Council discussed
complaints of 4:00 a.m. work start ups, noise, odor, mispresentation
of project and unhealthy conditions on the site.
Mr. Stenborg stated that noise tests will be done and complied with
as well as odor control systems installed and contractors will be
instructed to begin working no earlier than 7:00 a.m. Mayor Rascop
questioned sealing of the wet well at night, ventilation and site
fencing. Council asked about additional sewer capacity after the
interceptors are completed. Mr. Odde's office will have to determine
the total capacity received. Mr. Stenborg asked to be notified of
any additional complaints or questions.
-3-
r
MINUTES - TUESD', OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 4
.
PUBLIC HEARING
Property elean-Up
The public hearing for the 1988 property clean-up certification
was opened by Mayor Rascop at 8:05p.m. for public comment.
Administrator Vogt submitted two parcels for certification in
the amounts of $139.00 and $4,214.35.
RESOLUTION NO.III-88
Mr. Larry Bader owner of the property on Riveria Lane stated
that he received his notice of certification last Thursday, that
stated that the hearing was held on September 12. Administrator
Vogt stated that the date was in error, notice was sent to the
last known address on record. Attorney Froberg did not feel the
date error effected the certificati0n, he also' stated" that the
original notice of clean-up was sent last December. Mr. Bader
stated that Mr. Clapp was the owner in December and he regained
ownership on June 30th, he has discussed the ownership with
Attorney Froberg but no deeds were filed so no change of owner-
ship could be found. Administrator Vogt notified Mr. Clapp,
Bader and Miller Mortgage of the unhealthy conditions of the
property and the clean-up needed. At that time, no one would
accept responsibility for the property. The City took on the
property clean-up after the certified letter was sent out.
Mr. Bader stated that he was not the owner of Outlot D at the
time of the clean-up. The major problem was caused by squatters
on the property. He would like the assessment divided between
the two lots. Attorney Froberg stated that a notice of redemp-
tion showsLarry Dean Bader as the property owner. Mr. Clapp's
deed was not filed so the city had no way of knowing of any other
owner. Cost removal records were not separated, but treated as
one lot. Mr. Bader has a purchase agreement on this property
as does Mr. Clapp. This assessment will be paid off at closing
but he would like it divided on the two parcels so that the total
cost will not come out of his proceedings alone. He felt Attorney
Froberg was aware of the ownership situation. The Council did not
feel they could determine a separation of costs. Mayor Rascop
closed the public hearing after receiving no further comments
at 8:50 p.m.
Delinquent Sewer Service
The public hearing was opened by Mayor Rascop at 9:10 p.m. Clerk
Kennelly submitted a list of delinquent sewer service charges
in the amount of $21,657. After calling for and receiving no
public comments the Mayor closed the hearing at 9:13 p.m.
Delinquent Water Service
The public hearing was opened by Mayor Rascop at 9:14 p.m. Clerk
Kennelly submitted a list of delinquent water service charges in
the amount of $2,846.93.
Q,&I~,_c c.,'x, ~ Zt (--tJ ~ ~~-<-- \,L.; a <2- c-<-r V ~
-r~ LCj~ jk..-' U~ V</ t;...~~\lI'~ ~ ~C<--'f"'c" ~~ p- "- LL ~ / '7 t 9.
( .A-';' r, I . . 1.. /). '/ ~ V r>iL. 4/ A~,
7} ~Wl ,..-y-" &.J-....1.-..v.tfl ~ ~ . (I
.
.
MINUTES - TUESDAY, OCTOBER II, 1988
PAGE 5
SETBACK VARIANCE-5060 SUBURBAN DRIVE
RESOLUTION NO.112-88
Denis Tierney requested a clarification of "undue hardship". He was
disappointed in the cOInIl1issions cli:niar, of- his r-equest", due- to - their
interpretation of undue hardship. Haugen and Stover feel the
topography could be a hardship. There is a drainage flow and
ponding area on this lot. The Planning Commission and planner
recommended _ denial. The planner did offer an alternative site
location.
Neighbor Bob Boyer, spoke in favor of the variance and felt it
would have no adverse affect on the neighborhood.
Stover moved, seconded by Gagne to grant the setback variance due
to the hardship of topography and drainage. Motion carried - 4
ayes by Roll Call Vote.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-NOEL WOOD
2nd ADDITION
RESOLUTION NO.113-88
Mr. James Emmer of 5570 Covington Road was present to request to
divide his lot into two irregularly shape lots. Mr. Emmer dis-
agreed with the planners comments on drainage and suitable lot
width for a building pad. Stover stated that the Planning Commis-
sion recommend approval of the division subject to the planners
staff recommendation of his September 27, 1988 report.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to approve subject to the planners
report of September 27, 1988. Motion carried-4 ayes by Roll Call
Vote.
C.D.P. EXCEED 1000 SQUARE FEET OF
ACCESSORY SPACE-27280 ISLAND VIEW
ROAD
RESOLUTION NO.114-88
John Arnott was present, representing Mr. Robert Hegstrom of
27280 Island View Road, to request for a C.D.P. to add a storage
shed that added to his existing accessory space will total 1115
square feet. The Planning Commission approved the request as
did the Planner in his report of September 29, 1988.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to grant a C.U.P. permit as re-
quested. Motion carried-4 ayes by Roll Call Vote.
DENIAL OF VARIANCE-4505 ENCHANTED LANE
RESOLUTION NO.115-88
Mr. Allen Kramer of 4505 Enchanted Lane has requested a setback
variance and a variance to expand a non conforming structure for
an expansion he has done to his boathouse. He apologized for the
misunderstanding of not obtaining a building permit for his re-
modeling of his boathouse. He put pilings in last year to prevent
the structure from falling down.
-5-
.
.
MINUTES - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 6
DENIAL OF VARIANCE-4505 ENCHANTED
LANE-Continued
RESOLUTION NO.115-88
Planner Nielsen felt that the addition to the boathouse should
be removed including removal of one beam and two piers, the re-
maining two piers maybe able to salvage for a dock. Mr. Kramer
submitted pictures of his boathouse and others that exist in
the same lagoon. The DNR suggested that they would comply with
the City's action.
Mayor Rascop stated that Mr. Kramer did build without a permit
and extended into a protected area. Planning Commission recom-
mended that the added structure and pilings be removed. Stover
felt the beam should be considered a dock with a wood canopy.
Mayor Rascop said that the wood roofing is considered permanent
and not temporary like a removable canopy cover also permarient piling
requires a permit from the LMCD. Gagne and Stover supported Mr.
Kramer's request as it doesn't adversely effect other residents.
Haugen had concerns of setting ~ precedence.
Mayor Rascop moved, seconded by Haugen to deny both variance re-
quests supported by the planners report of September 26, 1988-
variance criteria, LMCD code and DNR regulations. Motionca~riea-
4 ayes by Roll Call Vote.
Mayor Rascop recommended that Mr. Kramer request permission of the
LMCD for two permanent docks and the DNR permit.
HOUSE MOVING PERMIT- 26120 BIRCH BLUFF ROAD
Mr.. Leo Meloche requested a house moving permit to remove a house
and garage from his property at 26120 Birch Bluff Road.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to grant the moving permit subject
to the Engineer's recommendations. Motion carried -4 ayes.
SETBACK VARIANCE - 4960 RUSTIC WAY
RESOLUTION NO.116-88
Mrs. Janice Toben of 4960 Rustic Way presented her request for a
setback variance from the street for a garage. She displayed a
site plan with three different locations and reviewed her objections
to locations referred to as A & B. They proceeded to clear a site
30 feet from the road instead of 30 feet from the right-of-way as
required.
Planner Nielsen stated that property stakes were to be verified
prior to beginning construction. A survey was done after a stop
work order was issued. Toben's stated that the alternate loca-
tions would conflict with their well and new retaining wall.
-6-
MINUTES - TUESjlt, OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 7
.
SETBACK VARIANCE-4960 RUSTIC WAY
Continued
RESOLUTION NO.116-88
Neighbors Peterson, Lund, Hudlow and Baune spoke in favor of the
Toben's request. They noted many other structures existing that are
much closer to the right-of-way than Toben's request. Rustic Way
has a right-of-way of 60 feet which will require a 12 feet variance.
Newly platted streets require a so feet width.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to grant the variance as requested,
hardship being topography' and meetin~ ~n ~uera~e setbagk looatiefl
willI 1:he prupl:.LlX lv the BortR. .Mption carried-by Roll Call Vote-4 aye~
cr~~e~:L~~~i~~8 P.M. )
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
STRAWBERRY FIELDS
RESOLUTION NO.117-88
Nanci Strickland-Balogh was present to request final plat approval
of Strawberry Fields into one lot and a residue outlot.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to approve the subdivision subject
to receipt of a current title opinion. Motion carried-4 ayes by Roll
Call Vote.
VACATE ALLEY PORTION OF TIMBER LANE
RESOLUTION NO.118-88
Attorney Froberg submitted a resolution for approval of vacating a
portion of an alley in the Lawtonka plat near Timber Lane.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to adopt the resolution for vacating
as submitted. Motion carried-by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - LAWTONKA
RESOLUTION NO.119-88
Joe Boyer was present to request approval of the Lawtonka final plat.
Attorney Froberg has r~d~a[l~u a new declaration of cOBvonionce and
requested an updated ~~~nion. ~
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to approve the final plat subject to
the approval of the title opinion. Motion carried by Roll Call Vote-
4 ayes.
SIGN PERMIT-MARCUS DEVELOPMENT-2436S SMITHTOWN ROAD
Council began the discussion with questions regarding the contamin-
ated soil presently piled on the site at 2436SSmithtown Road. Mark
Senn explained the PCA approved plan to filter the soil underground
through a ventilation syste. The soil would be buried in a liner.
Planner Nielsen recommended approval of the proposed wall sign permit
tabled until the second facility finalizes their plans for the pylon
sign.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to grant the sign permit for the
building wall sign. Motion carried - 4 ayes.
-7-
.
MINUTES - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 8
.
KEROSENE PUMP REQUEST - MARCUS DEVELOPMENT
Mark Senn submitted a new diagram with a suggested location for a
kerosene pump.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to deny the addition of a kerosene
pump. Motion carried to deny - 3 ayes to 1 nay (Rascop)
GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 DRAINAGE DISCUSSION
Administrator Vogt referred to the meeting held at the Tonka Bay City
Hall to discuss the proposed drainage project for the Glen Road/
County Road 19 area. Tonka Bay's engineer stated that his City has
choosen alternate two - pipe proposal. Shorewood chose alternate one-
including ponding and piping. The MCWD has estimated a $3,500.00
cost to define the drainage area boundary lines, a second boundary
would define an entire watershed district.
Mayor Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne to have Shorewood's drainage
district lines defined only, at a cost not to exceed $500. Motion
carried- 4 ayes.
Gagne stated that the owners of the properties requiring easement
granting arein agreement with the project. The apartment owner is
very interested in having a large clear pond. Staff should contact
the owner of the shopping center for participation in the project.
STAFF REPORTS
Attorneys Report
Consent Agreement Permiting the Firm
of Briggs and Morgan to Represent the
City in Litigation
1f...~AttorneY Froberg has received a request from the firm of Briggs
an~ Mo~g ~n !/ . ~
(t:., ~ ~_~the Suburban Hennepin Y have asked
~ ~~/ ---that Shorewood and Minnetri on the right to use con-
~J(Y.~~J . flict of interest ~ not represent us properly as a basis
0[y(Y '~or litigat' " t,h~~~~~A~~~1}~J~
n1 agne mo ed, seconded/by Stover 0 accept the a~reement contingent
I' on Minnetrista's acceptance. Motion carried - 3 ayes - 1 nay
.. .. - .
Ifr/'/ (Haugen) by Roll Call Vote. :z:4. ~ ~il '""'- ~ ...c...
Boulder Bridge Lawsuit ~~'_ Jj rt"4 _~-"J " e;;;:-'
A request has been made for the City to~ an excessive number
of documents to their Attorney's for review., ~ i~ eajcQ~;ag to
. ip causQg te thQ
~arr. The City will~ be able to introdu e Q..~mBR~S in court
that ~...,t furnished to ~t.. ::th-,~ .
Resolution No.l20-88
~~~
Q~
~
~n-~~~~~
~~~~
~... ......,..., ~ <>-I ~ ~.
. '
.
.
MINUTES - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 9
STAFF REPORTS- Continued
Engineers Report
S.E. Area Water Tower
The Water Tower went into service this afternoon. The
bacteria test was completed and approved. The flushing of
lines will be started soon.
Shady Island Bridge Repair
Residents of Shady Island have expressed their concern that
fuel trucks will not be able to service their homes. Admin-
istrator Vogt will find oil companies that have smaller trucks
to service these homes.
Council discussed two options available to quickly supply
access, the temporary road, or pilings and H-beam support.
Council discussed the time needed for obtaining permits,
drawing plans and specifications and advertisement for bids.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to proceed with the H-beam
support repair at an estimated cost of $20,000.00 to $25,000.00
and proceed with a request for funding for future replacement.
Motion carried - 3 ayes to 1 nay (Rascop)
A request for bids will be advertised for a bid opening
schedule the 28th or 29th of October. Staff will apply to
the DNR for an emergency permit but will proceed as quickly as
possible with the construction regardless of receipt of permit.
Amesbury Watermain Restoration
The clean up of the area is nearly completed. The Council has
agreed to transplant two large trees from Cathcart Park in
this area.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to purchase two additional
small trees for planting in this area from the water fund.
Motion carried - 4 ayes.
Planner Nielsen requested a modification to the plans for
the emergency access at Amesbury West. The plan calls for
sodding, he is requesting that it be changed to seed because
the area is not to be mowed.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to modify the landscape to
include seeding instead of sod. Motion carried - 4 ayes.
-9-
MINUTES
PAGE 10
.
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988
.
, '
STAFF REPORTS- Continued
Administrative Report
Goose Round-Up
Administrator Vogt would like to schedule a public meeting
to discuss a possible Spring Goose round-up. He has been
asked by residence of Timber Lane, Christmas Lake and En-
chanted Island for help with this problem. A Mr. Cooper,
from the University of Minnesota has volunteered to attend
this meeting to submit information.
Mayor Rascop moved, seconded by Gagne to set a public info~:-
mation meeting for November 28, 1988. Motion carried.
Finance Director Interviews
The interview meeting will be held beginning at 6:45 P.M. on
October 12, 1988 to hire a Finance Director.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Meetings
Mayor Rascop informed the Council of a meeting to be held,
Changing Demographicsand Institute of Internal Audits, which
Administrator Vogt will attend.
LMCD
JoeEllen Hurr, has been appointed chairman of the LMCD, Tom
Reese is vice-chair. New committees will be set up to work
on the Comprehensive Plan and inter-governmental relations.
A primary concern on the treatment of the weed "foil" will
be a major concern. He recommended that a sign be posted at
the Christmas Lake accesss to tell people to clean their
boats and trailers off of weeds prior to launching their
boats in an effort to prohibit transfer of this weed to the
lake.
COUNCIL REPORT
Haugen requested that Manor Park pond be cleaned out as long as
it is currently dry.
Haugen would like Metro Waste Control contacted regarding the re-
duction of flow due to the I and I repairs.
Residents have expressed concerns over tax dollars being spent for
education advancement of City staff.
Stover has spoken to Jim Schultz regarding the Comparable Worth
study. He stated that the purpose of the study was to determine
-10-
. '
MINUTES - TUE~Y' OCTOBER 11, 1988
PAGE 11
.
COUNCIL REPORT- CONTINUED
discrimination and if this was not proved a change in salary
plans does not have to be made. He questioned the study done
by Labor Relations and he will pursue the study if the Council
would like him to. Stover will ask about cost for this service.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT
Haugen moved, seconded by Mayor Rascop to adjourn the Regular
Council meeting of Tuesday, October 11, 1988 at 12:03 A.M. subject
to approval of claims for payment. Motion carried unanimously -
4 ayes.
General and Liquor Funds - Acct. No. 00-00166-02
Checks # 053872-053995
$ 267,784.50
Liquor
$ 65,264.52
General
Payroll Checklist:
Checks # 202443-202476
$
9,661.80
$ 2,991.70
$ 277,446.30
$ 68,256.22
Total
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Robert Rascop, Mayor
Sandra L. Kennelly
City Clerk
-11-
.... -
CHECK NO.
053872 (G)
053873 (L)
053874
053875 (G)
053876 (G)
053877 (L)
053878 (L)
053879 (L)
053880 (L)
053881 (L)
053882 (L)
053883 (L)
053884 (L)
053885 (L)
053886 (L)
053887 (L)
053888 (L)
053889 (L)
053890 (G)
053891 (G)
053892 (L)
053893 (L)
053894 (L)
053895 (L)
053896 (L)
053897 (L)
053898 (L)
053899 (L)
053900 (L)
053901
053902 (L)
053903 (L)
053804 (L)
053905 (L)
053906 (G)
053907 (G)
053908 (G)
053909 (G)
053910 (G)
053911 (G)
053912 (G)
.
.
TO WHOM PAID
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS--BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 5, 1988
City of Excelsior
Commissioner of Revenue
Void
Jean Sorensen
Commissioner of Revenue
Bellboy Corporation
East Side Beverage Co.
Frank's Trucking
G & K Services
Griggs, Cooper & Co.
Johnson Bros. Liquor Co.
Mark VII Distributors,Inc.
Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc.
North Star Ice
Ed Phillips & Sons Co.
Quality Wine & Spirits Co.
Southwest Suburban
Publishing
Thorpe Distributing Co.
Gopher State One-Call, Inc.
Public Employees Retire
Bellboy Corporation
Griggs, Cooper & Co.
Johnson Bros. Liquor Co.
Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc.
Bellboy Corporation
Midwest Coca-Cola Bottling
Day Distributing Co.
Johnson Bros. Liquor Co.
Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc.
Void
Pepsi-Cola Co.
Pogreba Distributing, Inc.
Quality Wine & Spirits
Russell Marron
Albinson
Alternative Staffing, Inc.
American Linen Supply
Ameridata
AT & T
Associated Asphalt, Inc.
Bauer Built, Inc.
PURPOSE
1988 Fire Contract
September Sales Tax
Mileage
September Fuel Tax
Liquor Purchases
Beer Purchases
Liquor & Wine Purchases
Laundry
Liquor & Wine Purchases
Liquor & Wine Purchases
Beer Purchases
Cigarette & Misc. Purchases
Misc. Purchases
Wine Purchases
Wine Purchases
Advertising
Beer Purchases
Initial Fee
Additional Life Insurance
Liquor Purchases
Liquor Purchases
Wine Purchases
Cigarette & Misc. Purchases
Liquor Purchases
Pop Purchasea
Beer & Misc. Purchases
Wine Purchases
Cigarette & Misc. Purchases
Pop Purchases
Beer & Misc. Purchases
Liquor Purchases
Mileage for September
Supplies-Planning & Zoning
Temporary Help-Finance
Laundry-City Hall & Garage
Printer Ribbons-Finance
Utilities
Redi-Mix Asphalt
Repair Tire-Public Works
- 1 -
AMOUNT
$ 16,086.00
7,563.19
10.12
105.26
1,127.69
8,785.10
337.77
40.60
7,413.08
558.42
7,107.00
806.46
338.30
770.40
127.50
119.76
6,973.00
25.00
27.00
678.46
474.07
1,431.30
382.99
2,045.00
429.05
1,723.99
122.66
285.10
211. 80
1,317.15
191. 71
9.90
6.55
762.30
289.54
115 .62
2.84
180.84
30.90
CHECK NO.
.
.
AMOUNT
053913 (G)
053914 (G)
053915 (G)
053916 (G)
053917 (G)
053918 (G)
053919 (G)
053920 (G)
053921 (G)
053992 (G)
053923 (G)
053924 (G)
053925 (G)
053926 (G)
053927 (G)
053928 (G)
053929 (G)
053930 (G)
053931 (G)
053932 (G)
053933 (G)
053934 (G)
053935 (G)
053936 (G)
053937 (G)
053938 (G)
053939 (G)
053940 (G)
053941 (G)
053942 (G)
053943 (G)
053944 (G)
053945 (G)
053946 (G)
053947 (G)
053948 (G)
053949 (G)
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS--BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 5, 1988
TO WHOM PAID
PURPOSE
Bob's Personal Coffee Servo Coffee, Filter, Etc.-City Hall $
Browning-Ferris Industries Chemical Toilets-Parks
Business Records Corp. Election Supplies
CBI Na-Con, Inc. Construction Pmt. 17-
S.E. Area Elevated Water Tank
Chaska Parts Service Misc. Parts-Public Works
D.R. Copier Service, Inc. Quarterly Contract 6/17/88-9/17/88
Froberg & Penberthy, P.A. September Attorney Fees
W.W. Grainger, Inc. Parts-Boulder Bridge & Amesbury
Pumphouse
Hance Hardware, Inc. Keyblanks-City Hall
Jim Hatch Sales Co. Parts-Public Works
Hennepin County Treasurer Prisoner Expense for August
Hennepin County Treasurer Real Estate Taxes
Heinen & Mason, Inc. Purchase Sprinker-P.C.I.
IBM Corporation System 36 Training-A.Latter &
S. Niccum
H.L. Johnson Co. Construction Pmt. 12-Project 88-1
Lano Equipment, Inc. Parts-Public Works
League of MN Cities Self-Insured Workers' Comp Premium
Insurance Trust
Long Lake Ford Tractor Parts-Public Works
Midwest Animal Services September Animal Control
MTI Distributing Co. Mower Purchase/Parts-Public Works
Midwest Asphalt Corp. Black Dirt/Limestone-Streets
Minnegasco Utilities
Minnetonka Public Schools Copier Paper
R.E. Mooney & Assoc, Inc. Sewer Supplies
Munitech, Inc. October Water & Sewer Services
Munn Blacktop, Inc. Construction Pmt. 12-Project 87-2
N-E-P Corporation Repair Parts-Badger Hockey Rink
Northern States Power Utilities
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Assoc.September Engineering Fees
Pepsi Cola Co. October Pop Machine Rent-City Hall
Pipeline Supply, Inc. Pressure Release Valves
Plant & Flanged Equip. Co. Repair Kit for Air Relief
Prentice Hall, Inc. Supervisors Factomatic Book
Roto-Rooter Services Co. Pump Lift Station 113
South Lake Minnetonka August Booking Fee
Public Safety
Minnesota State Treasurer Proposed Discharge for Evelyn Beck
State of Minn. Treasurer Fuel Bulk Purchaser License
- 2 -
124.80
250.00
60.65
14,858.78
162.90
30.00
3,330.00
24.05
6.00
64.97
183.00
1,763.38
3,300.00
525.00
1,541.57
41.28
15,348.00
131. 28
651. 75
8,860.47
4,322.82
56.53
107.86
133.29
4,175.00
6,749.77
56.74
1,865.77
22,202.14
10.00
145.41
242.36
55.33
733.50
74.95
37.00
10.00
CHECK NO.
053950 (G)
053951 (G)
053952 (G)
053953 (G)
053954 (G)
053955 (G)
053956 (G)
053957 (G)
053958 (G)
053959 (G)
053960 (G)
053961 (G)
053962
953963 (G)
053964 (G)
053965 (G)
053966 (G)
053967 (G)
053968 (G)
053969 (G&L)
053970 (G&L)
053971 (G&L)
053972 (G)
053973 (L)
053974 (G)
053975 (G)
053976 (G)
053977 (G)
053978 (L)
053979 (L)
053980 (L)
053981 (L)
053982 (L)
053983 (L)
053984 (L)
053985 (L)
053986 (G)
053987 (G&L)
053988 (G)
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS--BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 5, 1988
TO WHOM PAID
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Sterline Fence, Inc. Install Chain Link Fence-Manor ParkS
Suburban Tire Service, Inc. Repair Tires-Public Works
Super Cycle, Inc. Recycling Services for September
Tank Re-Nu of Minnesota Repair Gas Tank-Public Works
T & S Excavating, Inc. Construction Pmt. 12-Freeman Park
Tonka Auto & Body Supply Misc. Parts-Public Works
Tonka Printing Co. Office Supplies-General
Tri-State Bearing Co. Part-Lift Station 111
U S West Communications Utilities
Viking Steel Products, Inc. Repair Parts-Streets
Weekly News, Inc. Legal Notices-Gen & Dev
Widmer, Inc. Construction Pmt. 14-Freeman Park
Void
Ziegler, Inc.
IIA-Twin Cities Chapter
AFSCME Local 1224
City County Credit Union
Child Support Enforcement
ICMA Retirement Corp.
Commissioner of Revenue
The Bank Excelsior
Public Employees Retire
Water Products Company
Pogreba Distributing, Inc.
Metropolitan Waste Control
Reierson Custom Homes
Minnesota State Treasurer
Tim Ryan
Bellboy Corporation
Day Distributing Co.
Griggs, Cooper & Co.
Johnson Bros. Liquor Co.
Ed Phillips & Sons
Quality Wine & Spirits Co.
Paustis & Sons
Waste Management-Savage
United Way of Mpls. Area
Minnesota Mutual Life
Cyril Kerber
Parts-Public Works
Seminar-Dinner Meeting
Payroll 10/12/88-Union Dues
Payroll lO/l2/88-Credit Union
Payroll 10/12/88-Chi1d Support
Payroll 10/l2/88-ICMA
Payroll 10/l2/88-State Withholding
Payroll 10/12/88-FED & FICA
Payroll 10/12/88-PERA
Pressure Release Valves
Beer Purchases
SAC Charges
Building Permit Fee Refund
Building Permit Surcharge
Reimbursement-return meter & horn
Liquor Purchases
Beer & Misc. Purchases
Liquor, Wine & Misc. Purchases
Liquor & Wine Purchases
Wine Purchases
Wine Purchases
Wine Purchases
Waste Removal
United Way Contribution from Employees
Accident & Sickness Ins.-Nov.l988
Refund-Subdivision/Variance
Application Fees
- 3 -
1,135.35
60.39
1,560.00
150.00
29,487.70
84.06
10.70
42.20
168.28
226.38
69.64
257.00
336.20
10.00
97.20
112.00
ll.5.00
300.00
727.92
3,957.78
1,235.95
3,505.79
6.60
8,167.50
351.40
4,016.82
75.00
1,663.26
2,037.66
6,196.37
1,228.76
62.16
697.18
88.95
30.00
35.00
118.32
375.00
1
CHECK NO.
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS--BILLS PAID SINCE OCTOBER 5, 1988
TO WHOM PAID
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
053989
053990
053991
053992
053993
053994
053995
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(L)
(G)
Minnegasco
Minnesota Bar Supply, Inc.
Northern States Power
Royal Crown Beverage Co.
Waste Management-Savage
The Wine Company
Norwest Bank
Maintenance Contract
Cigarette & Misc. Purchases
Utilities
Pop Purchases
Waste Removal
Wine Purchases
Sewer Imp. Bond 11-1-71
Total Liquor
Total General
TOTAL
- 4 -
$ 25.00
375.29
295.29
132.91
30.00
33.24
102,078.00
65,264.52
267,784.50
333,049.02
~ ' , .
CHECK NO.
PAYROLL
202443
202444 (G)
202445 (G)
202446 (G)
202447 (G)
202448 (G)
202449 (G)
202450 (G)
202451 (G)
202452 (G)
202453 (G)
202454 (G)
202455 (G)
202456 (G)
202457 (G)
202458 (G)
202459 (G)
202460 (G)
202461 (G)
202462 (G)
202463 (L)
202464 (L)
202465 (L)
202466 (L)
202467 (L)
202468 (L)
202469 (L)
202470 (L)
202471 (L)
202472 (L)
202473 (L)
202474 (L)
202475 (L)
202476 (L)
.
.
TO WHOM PAID
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS--BILLS PAID SINCE OBTOBER 5, 1988
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Void
Robert Rascop
Janice M. Haugen
Barbara J. Brance1
Robert L. Gagne, Jr.
Kristi Stover
Daniel J. Vogt
Sandra L. Kennelly
Susan A. Niccum
Anne P. Latter
Jean M. Sorensen
Bradley J. Nielsen
Patricia R. Helgesen
Charles S. Davis
Dennis D. Johnson
Daniel J. Randall
Howard V. Stark
Ralph A. Weh1e
Donald E. Zdrazi1
Joseph P. Lugowski
Russell R. Marron
Christophe Schmid
Donald Tharalson
John F. Thompson
Michael J. Koebensky
Brian D. Jakel
Martey W. Jakel
William F. Josephson
Susan M. Latterner
Dean H. Young
Scott B. Bennyhoff
Scott M. Bartlett
James A. She1ledy
William F. Rhodes
Mayor
Council
Council
Council
Council
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
82 Reg Hrs 2 On Call
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
65 Reg Hrs
12 Reg Hrs
20 Reg Hrs
16.50 Reg Hrs
31 Reg Hrs
20 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
36 Reg Hrs
80 Reg Hrs
24 Reg Hrs
36 Reg Hr~
5 Reg Hrs
38 Reg Hrs
Total Liquor
Total General
TOTAL
Total Liquor
Total General
TOTAL
- 5 -
$
200.00
126.32
147.82
150.00
150.00
1,078.88
749.97
483.30
366.94
547.45
862.30
640.07
402.22
618.82
649.01
542.22
504.27
827.05
615.16
517.55
249.67
63.60
100.00
81.30
145.52
98.55
569.92
154.37
524.15
123.18
165.61
24.64
173.64
2,991.70
9 , 661. 80
12,653.50
68,256.22
277,446.30
345,702.52
,.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1988
TONKA BAY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4901 MANITOU ROAD
7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
The Special Council meeting of the Shorewood and Tonka Bay
City Council's was called to order at 7:04 P.M., Tuesday,
October 4, 1988 in the Tonka Bay Council Chambers by Tonka Bay
Mayor Ruth Sherman.
ROLL CALL
Shorewood: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Gagne and Brancel,
Attorney Froberg and Administrator Vogt.
Tonka Bay: Mayor Sherman, Councilmembers Keller, Niccum,
Haug and Ottum, Attorney Penberthy, Engineer
Adolph and Administrator McDonald.
GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 DRAINAGE PROJECT
Kevin Larson of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's engineering
firm reviewed the scope of the proposed project. The review was
similar to that given at the earlier Joint Council meeting held on
August 16, 1988.
Mayor Rascop explained that Shorewood wishes to pursue Alternative 1
which contemplates using a series of ponds to alleviate the storm
water problems. Administrator Vogt explained that the City Engineer
has the information necessary to create the legal descriptions for
the easements. Upon completion of the legals, the City Attorney will
draft and send the easement documents to the affected .property owners.
Engineer Adolph indicated that Tonka Bay would prefer Alternative 2
which pipes the water. The cost is approximately $20,000.00 less
than Alternative 1. Engineer Adolph also mentioned looking into less
than the 100-year storm and the Manitou Park drainage area.
Financing alternatives such as Special Assessments and Taxing Districts
or a combination thereof were also discussed.
-1-
!()
.
MINUTES-SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1988
PAGE 2
.
GLEN ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 19 DRAINAGE PROJECT'- Continued
It was agreed that each Council would go back and discuss the
additional study area and whether or not to contribute to the cost
of preparing the study.
ADJOURNMENT
By mutual consensus of both City Councils, the Special meeting of
Tuesday, October 4, 1988, adjourned at 8~lO P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Robert Rascop, Mayor
Daniel J. Vogt, City Administrator
-2-
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 12, 1988
.
CONFERENCE ROOM
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
6:45 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Rascop called the Special meeting of October 12, 1988 to
order at 6:53 P.M. in the City Hall Conference Room for the
purpose of interviewing candidates for the position of Finance
Director.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Rascop, Councilmembers Haugen, Stover, Gagne
and Brancel.
Staff: Administrator Vogt and Consultant Jim Brimeyer.
INTERVIEWS
The meeting began with a brief interview training session conduct-
ed by Consultant Jim Brimeyer of the executive search firm Sathe
and Associates. Interviews began promptly at 7:15 P.M. Five
people were interviewed for the position. Each interview was 30
minutes in duration. Interviews concluded at 9:40 P.M. After
the interviews, the Council rated each interviewee. Upon con-
clusion of Council deliberation, Haugen moved, seconded by Stover
to offer the job to a Mr. Alan Rolek after a thorough reference
check at a starting salary of $28,000.00 and a bank of 80 hours
of sick leave on the first day of employment with reviews in six
months and annually starting on approximately January l~ 1990.
Motion carried unanimously - 5 ayes.
ADJOURNMENT
Brancel moved, seconded by Gagne to adjourn the Special Council
meeting of Wednesday, October 12, 1988 at 10:07 P.M. Motion carried
unanimously - 5 ayes.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Robert Rascop, Mayor
Daniel J. Vogt
City Administrator
-1-
IG
.
. .
O~U =&
~WJ. Associates, Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
October 20, 1988
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
ATTN: Mr. Dan Vogt
Administrator
RE: Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 9th Addition
OSM Comm. #1744.23
Dear Dan:
The developer's engineer, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., has requested the City take
over the ownership and maintenance of the street improvements on Near Mountain
Boulevard, south of Chestnut Terrace. We have inspected this work and find it
to be in conformance with City standards. Therefore, we recommend the City take
over the ownership and maintenance of the street, Near Mountain Boulevard, south
of Chestnut Terrace.
A one year warranty period wi-ll start when the City receives a. ma.intenance bond
from the developer. This is in conformance with the requirements stated in the
development agreement. A bond from the developer1s contractor is not
sufficient.
If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
d- -f. lJ~
James P. Norton, P.E.
City Engineer'
cc: Mr. Phil lipka, Resident Inspector
Mr. Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Daniel Blake, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc.
/lmt
///1
. .
0\'4 ~~
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
October 20, 1988
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
ATTN: Mr. Dan Vogt
Administrator
RE: Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 10th Addition
(McKinley Place at Near Mountain 2nd Addition)
OSM Comma #1744.23
Dear Dan:
The developer's engineer, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., is requesting the City take
over the street for public ownership and maintenance. We have inspected and
approved the construct.ion of the street.-Therefore ,we recommend the City take
over the ownership and maintenance of the street.
A one year guarantee warranting the street against defects will commence as soon
as the Ci ty -recei ves a mai ntenance bond from the developer. A bond from the
developer's contractor is not in conformance with the development agreement.
If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
d- f.1J~
James P. Norton, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Mr. Phil Tipka, Resident Inspector
Mr. Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Daniel Blake, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc.
/lmt
~
. .
O\~~~
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
October 20, 1988
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
ATTN: Mr. Dan Vogt
Administrator
RE: McKinley Place at Near Mountain 3rd Addition
OSM Comm. #1744.23
Dear Dan:
The developer's engineer, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., is requesting the City take
over the street for publ ic ownership and maintenance. We have inspected and
approved the construction of the street. Therefore, we recommend the City take
over-....:the ownership and maintenance of the street.
A one year guarantee warranting the street against defects will commence as soon
as the City receives a maintenance bond from the developer. A bond from the
developer's contraGtor_js not in conformance with the de~elopment agreement.
If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
~-P,YJ~
James P. Norton, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Mr. Phil Tipka, Resident Inspector
Mr. Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Daniel Blake, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc.
/lmt
· Q~Vl ~~
.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
6\2-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
October 20, 1988
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
ATTN: Mr. Dan Vogt
Administrator
RE: Sweetwater at Near Mountain 2nd Addition
OSM Comm. 11744.23
Dear Dan:
The developer's engineer, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., is requesting the City take
over the utilities:
1. Sanitary Sewer
2. Watermain
3. Storm Sewer
for pub] ic ownership and maintenance. We have inspected and tested these
utilities and they have been installed up to city standards. Therefore, we
recommend the City take over these utilities.
A guarantee warranty period of one year will commence as soon as the City
receives a maintenance warranty bond from the developer. A bond from the
deve 1 oper' s contractor is not in conformance wi th the development agreement
according to a recent decision by the City attorney.
If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
er- -P. 7/.:::fi;v
James P. Norton, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: Mr. Phil Tipka, Resident Inspector
Mr. Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Robert E. Payette, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc.
/lmt
..
"-s
~"
...
"
CJ
~
III
.
.
StJ
Ii"
<#'
~
o
'II
III
5 A T H R E - B ERG Q. U 1ST,
INC.
106 SOUTH BROADWAY . WAYZATA. MN.55391 · TELEPHONE 612-476-6000
September 28, 1988
Mr. Dan Vogt
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR MJUNTAIN 9TH ADDITION
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Dear Mr. Vogt:
As of September 8, 1988 the remainder of the site improvements at
CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR MJUNTAIN 9TH ADDITION have been completed. To
the best of our knowledge the work has been completed in general
conformance to the plans and specifications for the project. We
therefore respectfully request that the City of Shorewood accept the
portion of the street improvements on Near Mountain Boulevard, south of
Chestnut Terrace for public ownership and maintenance, subject to a
guarantee period of one year. The remainder of the street work was
accepted by the City in 1987. A bond from the contractor guaranteeing
the work is forthcoming.
Upon acceptance of the work, we would ask that the developer's financial
guarantee be reduced in accordance with the work completed.
Please contact our office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
~~.J.r--
Daniel A. Blake
DAB/elm
cc: Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Jim Norton, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
.
.
.
/ " "- 5
."
"
CJ
~
III
StJ
Ii"
-#'~
o
'II
III
SAT H ft E - B ERG QUIST,
INC.
106 SOUTH BROADWAY . WAYZATA. MN. 55391 · TELEPHONE 612-476-6000
September 28, 1988
Mr. Dan Vogt
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR M:XJNTAIN 10TH ADDITION
(r-ICKINLEY PLACE AT NEAR MJUNTAIN 2ND ADDITION)
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Dear Mr. Vogt:
As of September 27, 1988 all of the site improvements at CHESTNUT RIDGE
AT NEAR IvK>UNTAIN 10TH ADDITION (MCKINLEY PLACE AT NEAR r-DUNTAIN 2ND
ADDITION) have been completed. To the best of our knowledge the work
has been completed in general conformance to the plans and
specifications for the project. We therefore respectfully request that
the City of Shorewood accept the street portion of the improvements for
public ownership and maintenance, subject to a guarantee period of one
year. A bond from the contractor guaranteeing the work is forthcoming.
Upon acceptance of the work, we would ask that the developer's financial
guarantee be reduced in accordance with the work completed.
Please contact our office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
~~ ~cv\<.JL-
Daniel A. Blake
DAB/elm
cc: Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Jim Norton, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
.
.
,,5
,,"
.
...
(I
~
III
s"
""
~
~
o
1l
VI
~,
'"-'1-[ t.
SAT H R E - B ERG G U 1ST,
INC.
106 SOUTH BROADWAY . WAYZATA, MN. 55391 · TELEPHONE 612-476-6000
September 28, 1988
Mr. Dan Vogt
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
RE: MCKINLEY PLACE AT NEAR r-:DUNTAIN 3RD ADDITION
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Dear Mr. Vogt:
As of September 8, 1988 all of the site improvements at MCKINLEY PlACE
AT NEAR r-:DUNTAIN 3RD ADDITION have been completed. To the best of our
knowledge the work has been completed in general confonnance to the
plans and specifications for the project. We therefore respectfully
request that the Ci ty of Shorewood accept the street portion of the
improvements for public ownership and maintenance, subject to a
guarantee period of one year. A bond from the contractor guaranteeing
the work is forthcoming.
Upon acceptance of the work, we would ask that the developer's financial
guarantee be reduced in accordance with the work completed.
Please contact our office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
~~~
Daniel A. Blake
DAB/dm
cc: Nike Pflaum, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Mr. Jim Norton, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
...( '" S
~t.
+
...
Q
~
III
. .
,,/,/1.... l
" ~! 'A~.' 1 H R E .. B; ERG G U 1ST,
I r~ c.
err 2 3
,)',.
!'""'~t)
,. oJ
SCI
'II-
~
J.
o
"
VI
106 SOUTH BROADWAY . WAYZATA, MN. 55.391 · TELEPHONE 612-476-6000
September 21, 1988
Hr. Dan Vogt
CITY OF SHORE\"OOD
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Ninnesota 55331
RE: Sw'EETh'ATER AT N'EAR NOUNTAIN 2ND ADDITION
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
Dear Nr. Vogt:
As you are probably aware, the site improvements at S\\EETWATER AT NEAR
i'1Ol'NIAIN 2N'TI ADDITION have been completed through the first lift of
bi turninous, including all si te grading and uti li t:-" work. To the best of
our knowledge the work has been completed in general conformance to the
plans and specifications for the project. We therefore respectfully
request that the City of Shorewood accept the sanitary Sel-1er, watermain
and storm sewer portions of the improvements for public ownership and
maintenance, subject to a guarantee period of one year. A bond from the
contractor guaranteeing the work is enclosed.
Upon acceptance of the work, we would ask that the developer's financial
guarantee be reduced in accordance wi th the worl{ completed.
Please contact our office if you have any question.
Sincerely,
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
~{?~
Robert E. Payette, P.E.
REP/drn
cc: Nike Pflaum, Lunc.ip;ren Bros. Construction, Inc.
I"Ir. Jim Norton, Orr-Schelen-Nayeron Associates, Inc.
,.1'
.
.
"
Bond No. 0 27 84 71
QfAT ANERlG\N INSURANCE COMMNY
MAINTENANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that we,
G. L. CONTRACTING, INC., MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA
as Principal,
and the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Ohio and duly authorized to transact business in the State of MINNESOTA
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto
CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA as Obligee, in the sum of
ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTEEN & 12/100 DOLLARS,
for the payment whereof weD and tmly to be made, the Principal and the Surety bind themselves, their heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
SIGNED, sealed, and dated this
14th
day of
September
~ 19 88
WHEREAS the Principal and the Obligee have entered into a written agreement dated the
1st day of February ,19 88 ,for SWEETWATER 2ND ADDN.
the terms of which agreement were completed and accepted the
,19
day of
; and
WHEREAS the Principal has given a ONE (1)
or otherwise against defective materials and workmanship,
year maintenance guarantee under said agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the Principal shall well and truly comply
with such guarantee, then this obligation to be void; otherwise it shall remain in full force.
PROVIDED that no right of action shall accme on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation
other than the Obligee named herein; and
PROVIDED FURTHER that the Surety shall have no liability under this bond unless the Obligee shall give
written notice of claim of the Principal's failure to comply with such guaranteed to the Surety at its Administrative
Office at 580 Walnut Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 such notice to be given within the one (1) year
maintenance period.
NG, INC.
Principal
B
Countersigned:
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
By
Resident Agent
-~~~
,/' .. Attomey-in-R t
Jack Cedar1eaf II
F.9607C - 4/78 Printed In U.s.A.
.
.
. ,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Individual)
STATE OF
COUNTY OF.
} 55,:
On this day of , in the year 19-, before me
personally comets) ,
to me known and known to me to be the person(s) who (is) (are) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledge(s) to me that_he_executed the same.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Partnenhip)
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
} ss.:
On this day of , in the year 19_, before me
personally comets)
a member of the co-partnership of
to me known and known to me to be the person who is described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledges to me that he executed the same as and for the act and deed of the said co-partnership.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Corporation)
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Minnesota
,Ii' ___'I... ~~
} 55,:
On this 14 th day of
personally comets) David G. Swanson
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides in the City of
that he is the President ofthe G. L. Contracting. Inc.
the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation;
that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by the order of the Board of Directors
of said corporati~lld_~hh..ui~ Qj."l~like order,
I -. Linda Baar
, ~ ~ Ileb" Public - Minnllote
Ih!lllllllln County
111 Commission EljIIr.. IIII'. '0, t989
September
, in the year 19lH!-, before me
~>' -, ~
.-yy(~/. .' ('
..... ~ .... NOTARY PUBLIC
I
I
/).-/
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Minnesota
Ramsey
} 55,:
On this 14th day of
personally comets) Jack Cedar1eaf II
Attorney(s)-in-Fact of Great American INsurance Company
and who, being by me duly sworn, says that he reside(s) in St. Paul, MN
that he is (are) the Attorney(s)-in-Fact of Great American INsurance Company , the
company described in and which executed the within instrument; that he know(s) the corporate seal of such Company; and
that the seal affixed to the within instrument is such corporate seal and that it was affixed by order of the Board of Directors
of said Company, and that he signed said instrument as Attorney(sHn-Fact of the said Company by like order.
~~' ~~~~:~:~~~~~" cA,~1:~ (J/ Ua'7IM1L,'
RAMSEY COUNTY
, -.. .., Comm. Exp. AIle. 19.1992 NOT ARY PUB LI C
~-
September
in the year 19~, before me
with whom I am personally acquainted,
F.9713- 8/81
~ . c:- ..'~ r
tit&\T I\NERlG\N INSURANCE COMMNY
The number of persons authorized by
this power of attorney is not more than
SEVEN
.
No. 0
14395
POWER OF A TIORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint the person or persons named
below its true and lawful attorney-in-fact, for it and in its name, place and stead to execute in behalf of the said Company, as surety, any and
aU bonds. undertakings and contracts of suretyship. or other written obligations in the nature thereof; provided that the liability of the said
Company on any such bond. undertaking or contract of suretyship executed'under this authority shan not exceed the limit stated below.
Name Address Umit of Power
D. R. oot1GHER1Y JD.t.1Y G. CEDARLFAF ALL OF ALL
IN;K CEJ::lARLEAF R.J. I.ARSEN ST. PAUL, MINNESOl'A UNLIMITED
IN;K CEJ::lARLEAF, II E. rANGE:
amISTINE M. HANSEN ST. PAUL, MINNESOl'A $2,000,000
This Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attomey(s)-in-fact named above 0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed and attested by
its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 21st day of September ,19 87
Attest GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
,/
STATE OF OHIO. COUNTY OF HAMILTON - ss:
On this 21st day of September, 1987 . before me personally appeared ROBERT M. SCHUDER, to me
known. being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he is the Vice President of the Great American Insurance
Company. the Company described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal; that it was so affixed by authority of
his office under the By-Laws of said Company, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. .
This Power of Attorney is granted by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Great
American Insurance Company by unanimous written consent dated August 20. 1979.
\ '''-
" iil:,-.s....?!.. fED: ThIlt the President, the several Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice Presidents, or anyone of them, be and hereby is
th 0 d ~ :-- ~ ",' "0 .'." -" ,- '-'- 0____,__ <' - .... -~ .. ""'_iP.,~" 1:',-: " ,:. ~l"" -''', _:- "E',.,II' "i' ,,,~ r,)..."""v "~Sllrf'tv anv anti all
"" onze, Jrom tIme 10 time, to appomt oY.e vr i1lOt.,,,..,,",_-:,..,,'".'.lh-,::ICt tu l:;...eUnt' ''-'. 1i."U,) .;,'r.n~ """'..-:p""'TT""""'~"~~7-',"-"--":::':':...
bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, or other written obligations in the nIlture thereof; to prescribe their respective duties
iI1Id the respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such appointment at any time.
RESOL VED FURTHER: ThIlt the Company seal and the signllture of any of the aforesaid officers milY be affIXed by facsimile
to any power of attomey or certifICate of either given for the execution of any bond, undertaking, contract or suretyship, or other
written obligation in the nIlture thereof, such signature and seal when so used being hereby adopted by the Company as the originlll
siplrture of such officer and the original seal of the Company, to be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect
III though milnually affixed.
CERTIFICATION
I, RONALD C. HAYES. Assistant Secretary of the Great American Insurance Company. do hereby certify that the foregoing
Power of Attorney and the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of August 20, 1979 have not been revoked and are now in full force and
effect.
Signed and sealed this
14th day of
September
,19 88
+,
M
.
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
K risti Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO: Mayor and Counci1members
FROM, Dan Vogt JfjI
DATE: October 14, 1988
SUBJECT: Insurance Renewal
Attached you will find insurance renewal information received from our
insurance agent, Ken Jarcho. As can be seen, overall rates have actually
dropped.
As is normally practice, various insurance vendors were looked at to try
to reduce premiums. Again, North Star Risk Services through the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust is our best insurance purchase.
Due to the favorable rates and coverages, approval of the November 1, 1988 -
November 1, 1989 insurance renewal is recommended as follows:
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
Package Policy
Business Auto Policy
Umbrella
Workers Compensation
United Fire & Casualty
Blanket Bond
Transcontinental Insurance Company
Liquor Liability
$30,068.00
4,642.00
10,345.00
15,348.00
673.00
7,969.50
Total Insurance Renewal
$69,045_50
A few items are worth noting relative to the insurance renewal.
-If all things would have remained equal to the 1987/1988 quote, the
rate reduction would have been approximately $5,000. Due to increases
in values of vehicles, equipment, salaries and buildings, the 1988/1989
rate is constant with the previous year. Also, coverage for inverse
condemnation is included in the premium which is new. Limited pollution
coverage is not recommended.
-It would be possible to save $62.50 in liquor liability insurance by
changing carriers. However, this is not recommended due to the fact
that the carrier has a lower rating and the City has a good track record
with the current carrier. Also, the savings are so minimal that it
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
LIb
.
Memo to Mayor and Counci1members
Insurance Renewal
Page 2
.
doesn't seem to be worth changing carriers.
-You will notice that two quotes were received for umbrella liability
coverage in the amounts of $1,000,000.00 and $2,000,000. I have
discussed this matter with Attorney Froberg and we agree to stay with
$1,000,000.00 as proposed.
This item appears on the consent agenda of the October 24, 1988 Council
meeting for action.
Please contact me prior to the meeting if you have any questions.
DJV/a1
cc: Finance Department
Ken Jarcho
Attachments
-2-
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
INSURANCE PROPOSAL
EFFECTIVE DATE November 1, 1988
COVERAGE
AMOUNT
Property
$ 7,776.00
Inland Marine
1,517.00
General Liability
16,004.00
Errors and Omissions
4,146.00
Automobile Liability
2,608.00
Uninsured &
Under insured Motorists
117 .00
Crime
1,843.00
225.00
Automobile Physical Damage
Inverse Condemnation
400.00
Misc. Equipment on Autos
74.00
TOTAL
$34,710.00*
*Additional Premiuim to Add Limited Pollution - $560.00
Umbrella Liability - $1,000,000. Liability Limit - $10,345.00
$2,000,000. Liability Limit - $15,517.00
*Special Exclusions (In Addition to Standard Exclusions)
Child Molestation, Pollution,
Inverse Condemnation, Liquor Liability
We are attaching copies of the League's letter regarding Inverse Condemnation and
Pollution Liability Coverages along with copies of sample forms on both. Also
attached are copies of the League's letter regarding changes in coverage.
.
.
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
LIQUOR LIABILITY .
QUOTE FOR NOVEMBER 1, 1988 RENEWAL
COVERAGE PREMIUMS
TRANSCONTINENTAL ACCEPTANCE
$500,000. Bodily Injury - EAch Person
$500,000. Bodily Injury - Each Occurrence
$500,000. Property Damage - Each Occurrence
$500,000. Loss of Means of Support - Each Person
$500,000. Loss of Means of Support - Each Occurrence
$500,000. Aggregate
23730 Highway 7, Shorewood, Minnesota
Based on $600,000. Gross REceipts MIGA
19365 HIghway 7, Shorewood, M~nnesota
Based on $450,000. Gross Receipts MIGA
TOTALS:
BOTH COMPANIES ARE ADMITTED CARRIERS
BEST RATINGS: Transcontinental A+15
Acceptance B+5
$ 4,500.00
54.00
3,375.00
40.50
7,969.50
$ 4,404.00
100.00 FEE
3,303.00
100.00 FEE
7,907.00
.
COVERAGE
Property - Gen. Liab., Etc.
Business Auto
Umbrella - $1,000,000.
Liquor Liability
- Transcontinental
Blanket Bond
Workmen's Compensation
TOTALS
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
PREMIUM COMPARISONS
11/1/88 to 11/1/89
ANNUAL PREMIUMS
$ 30,068.00*
4 ,642 . 00
10,345.00
7,969.50*
673.00
1~,348.00
$ 69,045.50
.
11/1/87 to 11/1/88
ANNUAL. PREMIUMS
$ 29,853.00
3 , 64 6 . 00
10,345.00
8,500.00
616.00
17,175.00
$ 70,135.00
*Liquor Liability premium with Acceptance woudl be $7,907.00 annually, or a savings
of $62.50.
*Inverse Condemnation coverage is included in Property portion of premium.
*Limited Pollution would be an additional $560.00.
.
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, MN 55101.2526
(612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986)
May 6, 1988
To: City officials and insurance agents
From: League of Minnesota cities Insurance Trust
Re: Inverse condemnation and pollution liability coverages
Member cities of the League of Minnesota cities Insurance Trust
can now add liability coverage for certain pollution exposures
and for inverse condemnation liability arising out of zoning and
other land use regulations. The city can add either or both
coverages, either at renewal- or as a mid-term endorsement.
Copies of the endorsements are attached.
POLLUTION COVERAGE
LMCIT is now offering to member cities an endorsement which adds
back coverage for certain pollution exposures, replacing the
strict pollution exclusion currently used.
The optional limited pollution liability endorsement gives the
city coverage for property damage or bodily 'injury caused by a
release or discharge of pollutants, where three conditions are
met: 1) the release is accidental: 2) the release occurs
entirely above ground: and 3) the release begins and ends within
72 hours of the accident. The endorsement also adds back
coverage for liability stemming from the use of mace, tear gas,
or similar substances.
Obviously, this does not provide a solution to all of a city's
exposures to pollution liability. Landfills and underground
storage tanks are two examples of exposures that would not be
covered. However, it will provide protection for things like a
malfunctioning ventilation system in a city building, or an
accidental spill of herbicides by park maintenance workers.
The pollution coverage is subject to a $600,000 annual aggregate
limit, including defense costs. The cost of adding the
pollution coverage is 3.5% of the city's liability premium.
INVERSE CONDEMNATION LIABILITY FOR LAND USE REGULATION
In a 1987 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a city
could be held liable for a temporary taking of private property
resulting from enforcement of a zoning ordinance or other land
use regulation. This is a new liability expos~re for cities; in
the past, courts would bar future enforcement of an ordinance
which went too far, but generally would not award damages. The
. RfC"U MAY ? :3 '988
.
.
1987 decision means that a city could be held liable for "rent"
for the time during which an ordinance was enforced, if it were
later determined that enforcing that ordinance resulted in a
.taking" of the property. You may want. to discuss this iss~e
with your city attorney.
If a zoning ordinance has resulted in a taking of property, the
property owner's remedy is to bring an inverse condemnation
suit. However, LMCIT's current liability coverage document
excludes inverse condemnation. (Liability insurance policies
offered to cities by commercial insurance companies almost
universally contain a similar exclusion.) Because of this
exclusion, some zoning claims have not been covered by LMCIT in
the past - specifically those zoning-related claims based solely
on a "taking" theory of law.
LMCIT member cities can now add coverage for inverse
condemnation suits arising out of enforcement of zoning or other
land use regulations. This optional endorsement provides
coverage for liability for inverse condemnation damages for the
period of time during which the regulation is being enforced, up
until the time that the .courts determine that the regulation
constitutes a "taking." The coverage is subject to a $600,000
annual limit, and a 15% "coinsurance" provision: that is, LMCIT
would cover 85% of damages and defense costs, while the city
would bear the remaining 15%. The cost of adding the inverse
condemnation coverage is 2.5% of the city's liability premium.
It must be emphasized that this coverage applies only to
regulatory takings. It does not apply to an inverse
condemnation action which alleges that the city has physically
occupied or used private property without paying for it.
WHY ARE THERE ANNUAL LIMITS ON THESE COVERAGES?
In offering the pollution and inverse condemnation coverages,
LMCIT is '\'f::nturing into areas in which there is little or no
past experience on which to draw. Despite the risks involved,
the LMCIT Board sees LMCIT's job as finding a way if at all
possible to provide cities with coverage for their exposures.
The lack of past loss data makes it very difficult to accurately
project what the ultimate losses are likely to be or what the
proper premium rate should be. Obviously U . IT must strike a
balance between meeting the individual city's need for
protection on the one hand and making sure thatLMCITwil1
remain financially strong and stable so as to be able to
continue to serve cities on the other. The annual coverage
limits on both coverages and the coinsurance provisions on the
inverse condemnation coverage are designed to help keep that
risk manageable. Also, the extended reporting period option
will not appll to these coverages. Finally, because the
liability coverage is claims-made, rates can be adjusted in the
future to reflect the actual losses as they 'develop.
.
.
INVERSE CONDEMNATION EXTENSION ENDORSEMENT
In consideration of the additional premium listed below, it is agreed that Exclusion d. under Coverage D,
Errors or Omissions Liability, is amended to read as foll~ws:
d. To any claim for damages arising out of condemnation, inverse condemnation, adverse possession, or
dedication by adverse use, but this exclusion does not apply to claims for inverse condemnation damages
wherein:
(1) The alleged taking of private property resulted from the application of a land use, zoning,
building, subdivision or similar ordinance or regulation and not from a physical occupation,
invasion, or use of the property; and
(2) The alleged damage occurred on or after the retroactive date shown below but prior to a final
determination by the courts that enforcement of the ordinance or regulation constitutes a taking
of private property.
A claim covered by this endorsement will be deemed to have been made when suit seeking damages for
the wrongful taking of private property is filled against the "city".
With respect to damages recoverable under this endorsement, the liability of LMCIT shall be limited to
eighty-five (85) percent of the loss and loss adjustment expense to include legal defense costs and the total
liability of LMCIT shall not exceed $600,000 per occurrence and $600,000 in the aggregate annually.
With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the basic extended reporting period and the sup-
plemental extended reporting periods under Section VI - Conditions, are waived and no extended reporting
period is provided.
Addition Premium $ ~
Endorsement Effective Date . ~
Retroactive Date t ~
All other terms and conditions remain unch:n~~~' -
I "~\
., .~j.l. .;}}
i~' .".~
.<,j.'
(} '"V
!:. "1i:6
.~.~,
~#
Authorized Signature
ME042 (5/88)
.
.
LIMITED POLLUTION LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
In consideration of the additional premium listed below, it is agreed that Exclusion e. under Coverage A
and Exclusion e. under Coverage E are amended by inclusion of subsection e. (5) as follows:
(5) This exclusion does not apply with J,"espect to "bodily injury" or "property damage":
(a) which occurred entirely above ground caused by the actual, alleged or threatened discharge,
dispersal, release or escape of pollutants the result of a "sudden occurrence" which occurred
on or after the retroactive date shown below and prior to the expiration date of this covenant;
or
(b) which was caused by the discharge or dispersal of mace, tear gas or similar agent which occurred
on or after the retroactive date shown below and prior to the expiration of this covenant if
such discharge or dispersal was for the purpose of protecting persons or property or incident
to an arrest.
"Sudden occurrence" means an accident which happens entirely above ground and the pollution resulting
therefrom which begins and ends within seventy-two (72) hours following the accident and in the case of
a related series of accidents, the "sudden occurrence" will be deemed to have taken place when the first
accident in the related series of such accidents took place.
With respect to damages recoverable under this endorsement, the liability of LMCIT under this covenant
for loss and loss adjustment expenses to include legal defense costs, shall not exceed $600,000 per occurrence
and S6OO,OOO in the aggregate annually.
With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the basic extended reporting period and the sup-
plemental extended reporting periods under Section VI - Condition, are waived and no extended reporting
period is provided.
Addition Premium $
Endorsement Effective Date
Retroactive Date
All other terms and conditions remain on~
~~
Authorized Signature
ME043 (5/88)
III~~ -1
mimiC
.
.
1f.3ague of minnescJt;a cJit;ies
November 18, 1986
To: LMCIT agents
From: Peter Tritz
Re: New developments in LMCIT's property/casualty program
The LMCIT Board of Trustees has approved a number of changes in
LMCIT's property/casualty program. Most of these changes take
effect for coverage written'or renewed after Nov. 15. In order
to help keep you up-to-date on LMCIT, we are enclosing four
memos whi ch describe respe'cti vely LMCIT' s property/casualty rate
changes; new deductible options available to cities; the switch
to a claims-made liability form; and the revised liability
coverage form.
Incidentally, we've also beard a rumor that MSI may be entering
the market municipal insurance market for smaller cities in
Minnesota. 30 far, we haven't been able to confirm this, but if
it's correct, at least some cities would have available another
source of coverage.
If you hav,e any questions or need additional information, please
feel free to call me at the League office. Or contact LMCIT's
program administrator, North star Risk 3ervices,1401 W. 76th
St., Minneapolis, Mn. 55423; phone (612) 861-8600.
~~
'\.
-1 8~J'!1 !!'/(-:'" ',:i ..1\:,q-1LIt,~ ('~~):.jL. ~?~t..; L,It!:, II Ilr-H.lf.:~~':I,Jlj: : ~I I I f).'J
&.. <V
('.~ \S
~
::. '. r c:. ./~~)f-JCJr.J
.
.
h_ . :~=~1
.,;:, ;' II 'R C'} 1:: :"", ": 1-" '~l ('~:~ ...., ' "::"'1 f-'\ i {-. J (.:::'8
I....: :.::J .....'J ....1 4..... ~_, ,: * l' .,,~f~.._, t ~ ~.I ,~~ -' lor _~....I
LMCIT CHANGES IN COVERAGE
LMCIT has made a number of changes in the liability coverage
documents. The language has been simplified considerably, and
most of the coverage provisions which were formerly handled by
endorsements are now incorporated into the body of the document.
There are also a number of substantive changes in the
coverage. These Changes eliminate many of the ambiguities and
internal inconsistencies of the old coverage forms, broaden the
coverage in a number of areas, and conform the coverage much
more closely to the city's statutory duties to defend and
indemnify its employees.
The format of the liability coverage document is as follows:
I. COVERAGES
A. General Liability
B. Medical Payments
C. Personal Injury
D. Errors and Omissions
E. Automotive Liability
II. WHO IS COVERED
III. LIMITS OF COVERAGE
IV. DEFINITIONS
V. SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS
VI. CONDITIONS
This memo summarizes the major substantive changes in the
coverage. (The change to a "claims-made" format is described in
a separate accompanying memo.) Keep in mind that this memo is
just a summary. It will be important for cities and agents to
read and understand the actual coverage document.
1. Police Exposures The general liability coverage part has
been broadened to provide the city and its employees coverage
for the use of reasonable force to protect persons or property.
Further, the personal injury coverage part has been broadened to
cover the city and its employees for assault or battery
committed for the purpose of protecting persons or property, or
incidental to an arrest.
'I [3:': ,
. '. "II', (', J. ' I '. I .
j:. . I I; fil'i1:: ,J'
.' ;~2 ;.~ '-' -:5 GOO
.
.
2. Civil rights COverage The errors and omissions coverage is
revised to make it explicit that Sec. 1983 and similar civil
rights claims are-covered. (Note that LMCIT has consistently
taken the position that most of these claims were already
covered under the old forms; thus, this is more a clarification
than an expansion of coverage.)
3. Defense coverage The statutes and court cases make it clear
that a city's duty to pay for defense of its officers and
employees is much broader than its duty or its authorization to
indemnify them. The general liability, personal injury, and
errors and omissions sections are revised to reflect this broad
duty to defend employees. A provision in the "conditions"
section brings the coverage of damages (as distinguished from
defense) into conformance with the city's statutory duty and
power to indemnify its employees.
4. Punitive damages LMCIT has consistently taken the position
that punitive damages will not be indemnified. This is now made
explicit. Note though that LMCIT would still cover the defense
of suits for punitive damages, provided that the actions leading
to the suit arose in the course of the employee's duties.
5. Errors and omissions exclusions Formerly LMCIT's errors and
omissions coverag~, like nearly every other errors and omissions
form, excluded coverage for property damage, bodily injury, and
personal injury. This created a potential coverage gap for
those claims which didn't arise out of an "occurrence" (i.e.,
an accident), ,but which resulted in property damage or bodily
injury. (One example might be a claim for property damage
arising out of a decision to abate an alleged nuisance, which
a Court later determined to be improper.) The errors and
omissions coverage has been broadened considerably to eliminate
this possible gap.
6. Professional services exclusion - ambulance and engineer
exposures The "professional services" exclusion to the liability
coverage part has been modified so that only the professional
services provided by an attorney, architect, medical doctor,
dentist, nurse, or pharmacist are excluded. Thus, other
professional serivces, such as those of an ambulance attendant,
paramedic, "First Responder," etc. are not excluded. Similarly,
the professional exposure of a professional engineer who is an
employee of the city is no longer excluded. (Consulting
engineers would continue to be excluded as independent
contractors.) These changes eliminate the need for a separate
"ambulance malpractice" or "engineer's malpractice" policy to
protect city employees and volunteers.
This revised "professional services" exclusion can also be
endorsed on to the city's eXisting coverage, to provide the
expanded coverage for the remainder of the existing pOlicy's
term.
.
.
7. Aggregate limits All annual aggregate limits have been
eliminated with two exceptions: products liability and medical
payments.
8. Fellow employee exclusion The "fellow employee" exclusion
has been removed from the general liability and automobile
boverages. Coverage is now provided for claims made against one
employee of the city by another employee.
9. Medical payments The "medical payments" coverage has been
modified to apply only to bodily injury arising out of a
condition on premises which the city owns or rents. This does
not include streets, sidewalks or boulevards, except for those
abutting city-owned buildings or city-owned parking lots.
10. Employment-related claims Contractual obligations (not
to be confused with contractually-assumed tort liability) are
generally not covered under the liability coverages. However,
the errors and omissions coverage has been modified to provide
coverage for employment-related obligations, except for wages
and benefits owing.
11. Firefighters liability The automobile liability coverage
now specifically provides coverage to firefighters for the use
of any automobile (including the firefighter's own automobile)
in the performance of his ofticial duties. Cities are required
by statute to provide this indemnification.
12. Relief associations Local fire or police relief
associations and. their officers, employees, and members are now
listed as covered parties under the liability coverages.
13. Joint powers entities The coverage contract now
specifically excludes coverage of any joint powers entity, and
of any city liability arising out of the activities of a joint
powers entity, unless specifically named in the declarations.
This does not mean that LMCIT will not cover joint powers
entities. Where coverage is needed for the activities of a
jOint powers entity, LMCIT will issue a separate coverage
document to the joint powers entity. That coverage will also
name each of the entity's constituent cities as additional
covered parties. This approach has the advantage of putting all
of the coverage relating to the joint entity's activities under
a single coverage document, rather than involving the liability
coverage of each of the constituent cities.
Note also that the excl~sion applies only to those joint powers
agreements which actually create a separate joint entity. Joint
powers contracts under which the city is merely providing
services to or receiving services from another political
subdivision don't create any special problems under the city's
LMCIT coverage.
.
.
::' (::] r~J LJ 8 CJf
.. . I ..
l'.'j "\ I r") rlE:;}:::ll ~i ;Lj C; Ie! (3 S
LMCIT "CLAIMS-MADE" LIABILITY FORMS
LMCIT will use a "claims-made" coverage form for general
liability and public officials errors and omissions coverage
written after Nov. 15. (Automotive liability coverage will
ci6~tinue to be written on an "occurrence" basis.) This memo is
intended to help explain to city officials what this change
means, the problems "claims-made" coverage can create for the
buyer, and how LMCIT has dealt with those problems.
The primary reason for changing to "claims-made" coverage was
that it would have been difficult or impossible for LMCIT to get
reinsurance if an floccurrence" form were used. "Claims-made"
coverage also simplifies 'underwriting and rating to some extent,
since the underwriter does not have to try to predict and allow
for pos3ible future changes in the law governing liability for
occurrences during the current year.
What is _~~laims-made"coverage?
The baeic difference between "claims-made" and "occurrence"
coverage is in which claims are payable under a particular
policy. With "occurrence" coverage, the key question is when
the incident happened. If the incident occurred during the
policy period, it is covered regardless of when the claim is
made. (This assumes, of course, that the ,incident is one which
falls within the kinds of claims that the policy covers.)
With "claims-made" coverage, whether a claim is covered by a
particular policy depends not only on when the incident occurred
but also on when the claim was first made. This can perhaps
best be illustrated by an example.
Consider a "claims-made" policy which runs for the calendar
year. The 1987 policy will cover claims arising out of
incidents which happened during 1987, provided the claim was
also made during 1987. When that policy is renewed for 1988,
the 1988 policy will cover claims made during 1988 which arise
out of incidents that happened during either 1987 or 1988. The
1989 renewal, then, will cover claims made during 1989 for
incidents which happened during 1987, 1988, or 1989.
Thus, each successive renewal of a "claims-made" policy covers a
greater' number of claims. This is the reason why "claims-made"
coverage is cheaper during the first year, and why. each
successive renewal of a "claims-made" policy becomes more
expensive. (The cost does level off after about five years.)
1 fL. ',II: '
i r"Il It ", ; .', I ....; . ' ; i, I, 'I, 1) .111 II ,';: .', 1 .: 1-1 ;.. ,! :
i ;~1 c':-?7-5600
.
.
Potential problems with "claimS-made coverage
The problem with ~claims-made" coverage really arises when you
want to change carriers. The new carrier typically won't want
to accept risk for claims arising out of incidents which
happened before the inception date of his policy. This can
create a gap in coverage, for claims made after the date of the
change in carriers for incidents which happened before the
change. Unless special steps are taken, neither carrier will
cover those claims.
There are two ways to solve this problem; either will involve
paying some additional premium to someone. One is to get the
new carrier to agree to cover claims from those earlier }
incidents. However, most carriers are very reluctant to dO
this, although it is certainly worth inquiring about if you find
yourself in this situation. The second way is to get the old
carrier to agree to cover those claims, even though the claim
happens after his policy has expired. (This agreement is called
an "extended reporting period.") Of cburse, the old carrier has
no particular incentive t9 agree to give you that extension, or
to charge a reasonable price if he does agree to do it.
This is why is is extremely important in purchasing a
"claims-made" policy to make sure that the policy gives you the
right buy an extended reporting period. Unfortunately, many
"claims-made" policies give the buyer that right only if the
carrier cancels or refuses to renew the coverage. Thus, if the
buyer decides not to renew the coverage, the old carrier is
under no obligation to offer an extended reporting period.
If an extended reporting period is offered, it may be only for a
limited time - sometimes as little as a year or two. An
extended reporting period of limited duration certainly is
better than nothing, but if there is any time limit at all, the
potential gap still exists.
A third problem is that even if the policy gives you the right
to buy an unlimited extended reporting period, the cost to buy
that extension probably won't be specified. You'll have to pay
whatever the old carrier feels like charging. (The standard
"claims-made" forms recommended by ISO, for example, state on~y
that the cost of the extended reporting period can't exceed 200%
of the last year's premium.)
How LMCIT addresses those problems
LHCIT's revised coverage document includes an automatic 60 day
extended reporting period. It also gives the city the right to
purchase an extended reporting period of unlimited duration.
The clty has this right regardless of whether it is the city's
or LMCIT's decision not to continue the coverage. The cost of
purchasing the extended reporting period is spe~ified in the
coverage document itself.
.
.
The cost depends on how long the city has been covered under the
"claims-made" coverag-e. It ranges from 34.6% of premium if
coverage has been for one year, up to 70.8% of premium if
coverage has been for five years or more. By comparison,
standard ISO "claims-made" forms allow a range of up to 200%.
"Other forms often say nothing at all about the cost of extending
~.. coverage.
--Because the LMCIT coverage document offers an unlimited extended
reporting' period for a known cost, the city really has available
the equivalent of "occurrence" coverage. The city may wIsh to set
aside each year the funds necessary to purchase the extended
reporting period; i.e., roughly 35% of premium the first year,
18% the second year, 8% the third year, and so on. After five
years, the cost of the extended reporting periOd stops
increasing, so that no further funds would need to be set aside.
(The exact percentages needed would vary somewhat depending on
changes in the city's rating base from year to year.)
~1ID~-l
1I11'IIIIG
.
.
li~:~ague of rninnesota cities
LMCIT PROPERTY/CASUALTY RATES
1. Overall For coverage written or renewed after Nov. 15,
LMCIT's property/casualty rates will be reduced somewhat. The
largest reductions will be on the property, automotive physical
damage, and inland marine coverages~ These reductions reflect
LMCIT's consistently good loss experience in these areas.
Rates for general liability coverage will also decrease
slightly. This reduction is largely a function of the switch to
a "claims-made" coverage form, as discussed in an accompanying
memo. However, it also r~fl~cts projected savings attributable
to LMCIT's in-house defense capability, and to the 1986
amendments to the municipal tort liability statutes. The
revised rates also reflect the broader coverage provided by the
revised coverage forms.
Of course, an individual city's premium will be affected by any
changes in the city's exposures - e.g., increased city
expenditures, higher property values, etc. - as well as by the
rate changes.
Cities should also keep in mind that the 10% reserve assessment
has been eliminated for all renewals after the June 1, 1986.
2. Small cities rate credit As part of the overall review of
rates, LMCIT looked at how premiums and losses have compared for
various population classes of cities. This study showed that
the experience has been somewhat better for smaller cities than
for larger ones.
Because of this loss experience, cities of under 500 population
will receive a rate credit of 20%. Cities between 500 and 2500
population will receive a 10% rate credit. These rate credits
will apply tocove~age written or renewed after Nov. 15, 1986,
and will be applied in addition to the overall rates changes
described above.
1 Ei>' ; II;!""," " {;'l\l[~nu.:~ 8C'1St. ~31-;. P:ll.:1. ITlinnef3ot.::'j ~5:'5 '101 fE 1 ~.~) 227 -5600
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Counci1members
Dan VOgt1f(f'
October 17, 1988
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Finance Director Hiring
As you are aware, Jim Brimeyer of Sathe and Associates was directed to
negotiate with Alan Ro1ek for the position of Finance Director. At our
meeting held on October 12, 1988, a starting salary of $28,000.00 was
approved. Upon negotiation, Mr. Ro1ek indicated that the advertised salary
range was $30,000.00 to $35,000. He stated that he would start work for the
City at a starting salary of $30,000.00 since that was an amount advertised
and he was obviously capable of taking the position.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the consultant and me to make the
starting salary of Mr. Alan Ro1ek $30,000.00 for the position of Finance
Director.
This item appears on the consent agenda of your October 24, 1988, Council
meeting for your ratification.
Please contact me if you have any questions prior to the meeting.
DJV/a1 '
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~
..
.
1988 ELECTION JUDGES
PAGE 2
.
PREC III - Continued
(R) June Coad
21095 Forest Drive
Shorewood, MN 55331
474-6744
( ) Joan Lang
5490 Wedgewood Drive
Shorewood, MN 55331
( ) Ed Bottman
5710 Grant Lorenz Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
PREC IV
(D) Rita Spellman (CHair)
5100 Shady Island Trail
Mound, MN 55364
474-7919
(D) Judy Hagen
5125 Shady Island Road
Mound, MN 55364
474-5549
(R) Ginny Soule
4595 Enchanted Point
Mound, MN 55364
474-1250
(R) Carmelita V. Smith
4345 Enchanted Drive
Mound, MN 55364
474-9668
( ) Jeanne England
4545 Enchanted Point
Mound, MN 55364
MEMORANDUM
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN
DATE: 19 OCTOBER 1988
RE: TRACEY ADDITION - FINAL PLAT
FILE NO.: 405 (88.31)
Ron Tracey has submitted a final plat for the Tracey Addition (see Exhibit A.
attached). The plat is consistent with the preliminary plat which was approved
on 12 September. The preliminary plat approval was contingent upon the City
Engineer's approval of a proposed driveway and drainage plan to be submitted by
the applicant. This plan. shown on Exhibit B. is addressed under separate
cover by the Engineer.
The City Attorney has discovered a discrepancy between the legal description
shown in the applicant's title opinion and the description shown on the plat.
Since the discrepancy affects the easements being dedicated to the City. it
must be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to release of
the final plat.
The previous approval was also contingent upon an agreement by the applicant
stating that the garage building. located on the Covington Road right-of-way.
would be removed at such future date as the City may wish to make improvements
to Covington Road. The City Attorney has recommended that this stipulation is
best addressed by a declaration of covenants. To date we have not received a
proposed draft of such declaration from the applicant's attorney.
Approval of the final plat is recommended subject to the following:
1. The applicant must resolve the discrepancy between legal descriptions on
the title opinion and the plat to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.
2. The City Engineer must approve the driveway/drainage plan.
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
5/1
.
.
Re: Tracey Addition
Final Plat
19 October 1988
3. The City Attorney must approve a declaration of covenants which ensures
that the nonconforming garage will be removed at such time as the City
desires to make improvements on Covington Road. The declaration must be
submitted by the applicant with in 30 days of the Council's approval of the
plat.
4. The applicant must pay $500 in park dedication fees prior to release of the
plat.
5. The applicant must record the plat within 30 days of the date the Council's
resolution is certified by the City Clerk.
BJN:ph
cc: Dan Vogt
Glenn Froberg
Jim Norton
Ron Tracey
Jim Bruce
- 2 -
- -
- -----
.
-
-
.
.
.
.L1
.
-.-
f"\ C" -,- H''--
'_,'I ; I c.
--,
I\ir',~, ,
: .... ....." ~.. '--
'(' (' r,
\~. . . ~
~.., '." '.'
-rle''''
" f"'\ r....,' ,Jl '.a
;..:". \..J ,-,,! I .
6)
~o~~
0' ,\~ ....-
~ l.~ \ '?)O
.:S \.. (70 rz., '\ ",
\- <O"~" ,./
YoJ' \ (~O"',(O ,./
\- '. .,\ L. ....
. '". 0"-
.... ", /, ......
~ ~ '. .......
~" :
"'~
'"
,.--- '"
%~~o"" ~
C'~ ;.0. ~ o~ ~"
JS:>~ ~t- 0-1 ""
\S'~
4~
r Neeo51'3to"E
\
2 .
. .
. :
: .
, .
o
r Neeosl'?>o"E
--.- - - - - - -
3cn,q~
...- 434.€>>S-'"
-~-_._-.-
o
. .
\....Line parallel wifh The N.
line oFGov'f lot 4
...<j'
\ ~6'
\ .)
~
o Denofes Iron monumenf
@ DenOTes Judiclol Landmark.
BeClr/'ng5 shown are based On the s. '''ne
o~~o~~f ~ot.. 3 haVin.9 on ossunled bearing
88NCHfv1AQI< :
Top or Sanitary Sewer Man hole
os shown. t/eV. = IOO~. 61 (NGvO, 1< Exhibit A
FINAL PLAT
~
.
.
'-...JV
/")
--
_/
qqA
,- I'
. "
, -3Q400-'
\
""
..........
/~
,/-""
".
....
.....
"
"
'\
I I ; I
"
~
.
as M". i Orr
,'; .... . /: ~;~~~n&
. . ;. Associates, Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
.
'"
October 19, 1988
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Review of Final Plat and Plan
For the Tracey Addition
Shorewood, Minnesota
OSM Comm. No. 1744.03
Dear City Officials:
We have reviewed the grading and drainage plan for the Tracey Addition as prepared
by Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Our review comments address the following items:
1. The driveway slope is 12% for the most part. Generally, this slope should not
exceed 10%, especially in the tight curve section. The proposed driveway
location and contour changes should be reviewed to determine if the slope can
be reduced.
2. The proposed grading on the south side of the driveway exceeds the maximum 3:1
slopes allowed. This can be corrected with more grading to the south or more
stringent erosion control using plantings or other measures.
3. Near the top of the dri veway, the proposed 1004 contour intersects wi th the
existing 1002 contour which is unacceptable and can be corrected with more
grading to the west. .
4. The tight turning radius at the proposed curve will not provide adequate access
for emergency vehicles such as fire trucks. A fire truck requires an inside
radius of approximately 28' and an outside radius of approximately 42'.
. Approval of th;:;dr'iveway would be with the understanding of that limitation.
5. Any proposed retaining walls require the design and plan submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval.
6. Erosion control both during and after construction is an important item that
must be addressed. A silt fence is shown along the south side of the driveway.
Additional silt fence may be needed to the east along the proposed construction
near Covington Road.
7. The drainage is shown runn i ng down the dri veway and spi 11 i ng onto the yard
about 60' from the proposed garage. Some additional erosion control may be
necessary at this location. Also, consideration should be given to construct-
ing the driveway with an inverted crown; this would keep the runoff water on
the hard surface driveway and not cause an erosion problem at the interface of
the driveway and the sod.
615
...
.
.
..,
Page Two
City of Shorewood
October 19, 1988
Access to lots like this is always difficult. A thorough investigation of ways to
simpl ify the access and reduce the severity of the slope pays off in the end.
Additional expense at the design and construction stage is more than compensated for
by creating a safer driving condition and reducing the maintenance required if not
installed properly in the first place.
If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
~p rJ~
James P. Norton, P.E.
City Engineer
JPN:mlj
cc: Mr. Ken Adolf, Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Bruce Construction Co.
I
I
~
.
.
MAVOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCil
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
ti
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN
DATE: 19 OCTOBER 1988
RE: KUEMPEL CHIME CLOCK WORKS AND STUDIO - REQUEST FOR REZONING
FILE NO.: 405 (88.46)
As explained in her letter. dated 14 October. Audrey McGregor has requested
that her property be rezoned. at the City's initiative. from R-1D.
Single-family Residential. to R-C. Residential-Commercial.
Apparently a rezoning and conditional use permit were approved in 1978. The
zoning amendment was adopted by resolution. however. not by ordinance. The
City Attorney has advised us that if all of the procedures for rezoning had
been followed (i.e. publication of notice. public hearing. four-fifths vote.
etc.) the effect would be the same as an amendment by ordinance. In'
researching the files. we find no record of the amendment ever having been
published in the official newspaper. Nor does the newspaper have any record of
publishing.
Consequently. the process must be repeated.
it is recommended that the City set a public
consider the rezoning. It is also suggested
restudied at that time.
Based upon the previous approvals.
hearing for 6 December 1988 to
that the conditional use permit be
It should be noted that the legal description for the previous request differs
with the amount of property owned by the business. Ms. McGregor is currently
having a survey updated for the proposed rezoning.
cc: Dan Vogt
Glenn Froberg
Jim Norton
Audrey McGregor
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
b
~
'\ :
.'1
- ~--.Y
. .
/fttlmnjlel
CHIME CLOCK WORKS & STUDIO
21195 Minnetonka Blvd., Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Telephone (612) 474-6177
Outside Minnesota 1 800 328-6445
October 14, 1988
Our family business has been our hobby
for more than seventy years serving
homecrafters the world over
,"
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Dear Friends,
We understand that the re-zoning which took place several
years ago for our entire property at 21195 Minnetonka Blvd.,
Shorewood, was done procedurally wrong, and somehow or
other remains zoned residential, creating problems for us.
Therefore, we request the city on its own initiative change
the zoning.
A copy of the original resolution is attached to this
letter. We do hope to be on the October 24 agenda.
Thank you.
~9:d~to)!; ent
KUEMPEL CHIME CLOCK WORKS
McG
Exhibit A
APPLICANT'S REQUEST LETTER
Dated 14 October 1988
Shorewood Planning Ceission
-2-
Study ~ing Minutes - 6/22/78
KUEMPEL CHIME CLOCK -21195 Minnetonka Blvd.
Request for R/C ZoninQ and Conditional Use Permit
Don and Audrey McGregor, owners of the Kuempel Chime Clock Company, were
present at the Public Hearing to make application for the new R/C Zoning
to said property (Currently non-conforming) and requested a Conditional
Use Permit for the continued operation of their business at 21195 Minne-
tonka Blvd. A proposed storage addition to their building was also dis-
cussed. The Public Hearing was closed June 8th; study to be resumed at
the June 22nd meeting.
June 22nd - discussion resumed resulting in the following recommendation
to the Counc il :
Moved by Leslie that the Council grant the Kuempel Chime Clock the
R/C Zoning and a Conditional Use Permit on lots 13, 14, and 15 of
Block 11, with the following conditions:
1) That it remain Kuempel Chime Clock operation.
2) That it be owned and operated by the same family and be operated
in the same manner.
3) That at such time as they would sell the operation, or it be taken
over by some other business, it must return to the Council for
permission, if the Conditional Use Permit is to be continued.
A roll call vote of 2 Ayes - 1 Nay, 1 Abstain.
Aye: Cole - I feel that the R/C zoning is the only vehicle available
to us at this time for granting this expansion; but I do not
feel it is as appropriate a vehicle as it should be for this
situation.
Aye: Leslie - I approve the business operation, as it is now, and my.
only concern is what would happen in the future, if this particu-
lar business would be sold. I feel that we need a legal stop-gap
for this situation.
Nay: Reese - I have nothing against that use; however, I feel the lack
of neighborhood opposition should not be sole criteria for this
use and I don't consider it good planning principle.
JAN HAUGEN ADDRESSES THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS LIAISON
(These are the thoughts of Jan Haugen - Address attached)
PRELIMINARY POLICY PLAN -#3 of Comprehensive Plan- Brad Nielsofl, Planner
9:45 PM - Mr Nielson of Midwest Planning was called upon to direct us in
the study of the Comprehensive Plan #3. The Primary and Secondary issues
were discussed and clarified at this time but due to the few members present
it was decided to go forward with the study at the next study meeting on
July 27th.
Chairwoman Cole made an apology to Mr. Nielson for his time being spent so
unfruitfully.
AD JO UR NME NT
Moved by Jane Cole, seconded by Stover, that the meeting be adjourned at
10:35 PM.
Re~ectful~y submitted,
~I-t~ ~~.c..lJ
Bobbie Dyb~~,Secretary
Exhibit B
PLANNING COMMISSIOM MINUTES
Excerpt from 22 June 1978
~
SHOREWOOD COUNCIL MINUTES
TENNIS COURTS
There was considerable discussion on whether a tennis court and fences
are structures or if a building permit is required. Council agreed to
review their policy and the attorney's comments, dated June 21, 1978,
on tennis courts; for consideration at a later meeting.
.
Ju ne 26, 1978
- 3 -
ENGINEER'S REPORT - Swimming Pool -24950 Amlee Road - John Jacobson
Moved by Heiland, seconded by Keeler, to approve the engineer's recom-
mendation to permit the installation of a swimming pool at 24950 Amlee
Road; to be enclosed with a 4' fence.
Motion carried by a vote of 4 to O.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT:
KUEMPEL CHIME CLOCK
The recommendation of the Planning Commission on the request of the
Donald Mac Gregors to include their property in the R/C zone, with a
Conditional Use Permit to operate the Kuempel Chime Clock Studio was
received and read. RESOLUTION NO. 47-78
Moved by Naegele, seconded by Keeler to include their property described
as Lots 13, 14, and 15 of Block 11 - 21195 Minnetonka Blvd.; in the
R/C Zone and issue a Conditional Use Permit for a Chime Clock Studio
operation.
On a roll call vote the motion carried by a vote of 4 to O.
STRAWBERRY GARDENS DEVELOPMENT
The Planning Commission Report was read on their recommendation for the
proposed development of Strawberry Gardens. The developer was repre-
sented by Richard Conry who stated that the developer; B. T. Land Co.,
would not agree to the Central Water System or approve the-extension
of the street through to Strawberry Lane.
Moved by Heiland, seconded by Haugen to ask the developer to meet with
the staff to further negotiate for a compromise and bring back a recom-
mendation to the Council.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Moved by Haugen, seconded by Heiland, to approve payment of claims
as follows:
General Fund
Liquor Fund
Ck No. 19369 - 19401
Ck No. 4269 - 4319
$ 9,723.59
35,230.71
Motion carried by a 4 to 0 vote.
Adjournment at 10~45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
/
'.7--
/ -~-
,
I .
//.,/;,.,
/
Exhibit C
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Excerpt from 26 June 1978
---.. ---.,
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 47-78
]J WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has received a rezoning
application submitted by Donald W. McGregor and Audrey McGregor,
as owners of Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 11, Minnetonka Manor 'for
the inclusion of said property within the R~C District, and
WHEREAS, said application further requests the issuance of a
conditional use permit for the operation of Kuempel Chime Clock
Studio as an art studio in said R-C zone, and
WHEREAS, the application was referred to the Planning
Commission for necessary public hearings, study and recommen-
dations and said public hearings have been held and the Planning
Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to
the Council,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Shorewood as follows:
1. That the property described as Lots 13, 14 and 15,
Block 11, Minnetonka Manor be and the same ijereby is rezoned
~ and shall be included in the R-C District.
2. That the proposed use as requested in the application
for a conditional use permit will not have a substantial or
undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the
neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facilities or other
matters effecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
3. That the proposed use will be designed, arranged and
operated so as to permit the development and use of neighboring
property in accordance with the applicable district regulations.
4. That a conditional use permit be and the same hereby
is approved and issued for the subject property, subject to the
following conditions:
a. That the use of the subject property shall
continue as the Kuempel Chime Clock Studio.
)
"It.
Ji,f>fI'f?
. ". '. '! ','
, ., 11'l!J
.
Exhibi t D
RESOLUTION 47-78
.,.
.
.
J
b. That the studio shall continue to be owned
and operated by Donald W. McGregor and Audrey
McGregor, or members of their family, and shall
continue to be operated in the same manner as has
previously been the case.
c. That in the event said owners propose that
the business be sold or be acquired by some other
business operation, this conditional use permit
shall expire and a new permit must be sought
for the continuation of such use or any new use
to be conducted on the subject premises.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of June, 1978.
1
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilman Naegele,
was seconded by Councilman Keeler, and upon a vote thereon
the following voted aye:
Haugen, Keeler, Naegele and Heiland
and the following voted nay: None
)
-2-