012389 CC Reg AgP
..
"'"
CITY OF
REGULAR
MONDAY,
ROLL CALL
~
..~......
SHOREWOOD .
COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY23,1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
Stover
Gagne
Brancel
Watten
Mayor Haug~n
v::
v/
.../
~p~-'
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Council Meeting - January 9, 1989
(Att.No.lA-MinutesJ
B. Special Council Meeting- January 18, 1989
(Att..No.lB-Minutes)
2. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
A.
B.
3. COMMISSION REPORTS
A. Planning Commission Report
B. Park Commission Report
4. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Cigarette LiceIlse Renewals
V
(Att.No.-Applicants List)
B. Ratify Senior Accounting Clerk Hiring
(Att.No.-Staff Recommenda-
tion)
C. Payment Voucher - Badger Field Watermain Project No. 88...3
(Att.No.4C-Payment Voucher)
- Shady Island Bridge Repairs Project No. 88....3
(Att.No.4D-Payment voucher)
-1-
..~
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1989
PAGE 2
'.",
-..
5. GOOSE SPRING ROUND..Up DISCUSSION
"t Presentation
.. .. .ursc~ssrONOF
_. .._ POINT ROAD
Jim Cooper-University of Minnesota
LAKE ACCESS OVER. PRIVATE PROPERTY- HOWARDS
(Att.No.6-Wadsworth-
Letter of .Request)
7. FINDINGS. OF FACT-YANIK VARIANCE-ENCHANTED ISLAND
(Att.No.7-Fin 'gs of
Fact-Unde:r Separate Cover)
8. FINDINGS OF FACT-LUNDGREN FENCE VARIANC~Att.NO.8_Fi~Of I
Fact-Under Separate Cover)1
I
9. DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT-TO DOG ORDINANCE
(Att.No.9-Miscellaneous
Ordinances)
10. CONSIDERATIQNOFEQUIPMENTBIDS.... One Ton--FourWheeldrive Truck
-Street Sweeper
Bid opening Friday, January 20 1989
11. STAFF REPORTS
A. Planners Report
1. Highway 7 Traffic Sign Plan
tAtt.No.llA-Staff Memo)
2.
B. Attorneys Report
1. South Lake Minnetonka Police Building-Lease Agreement
2.
C. Engineers Report
1.
2.
2-
,
~'
...
. .
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1989
PAGE 3
1. Discussion of Hiring Procedure For New
Administrator
~/~
City!3
11. STAFF REPORTS - Continue
D. Administrative Report
2 . flJ-e-e-V'/L (? ~
:::T~ '-.3{) - . ~~
'. .
0'~. t, - ~. ~~
. :sd rUJ~ ~. ~
~ ~. ~l)
12. COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Mayors Report
2.
~
~
1.
B. Council Reports
1.
l-( 5\uni. ~O-C~
2.
.~
13. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT
-3-
CITY OF
REGULAR
MONDAY,
"k:=- . ,,~,
"llC'r... .r, -.....'.... .........,..~.,
. ~. ..... .................... ...,..............
SHORE~D ... · CO .. cn CHAMBERS
COUNCIL MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
JANUARY 9, 1989 7:30 P.M.
~
,.~
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Council meeting of the Shorewood City Council was
called to order at 7:30 P.M., Monday, January 9, 1989, in the
Council Chambers by newly elected Mayor Haugen.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Haugen opened the Regular Council meeting with the Pledge
of Allegiance and a prayer.
OATH OF OFFICE
Clerk Kennelly administered the Oath of Office to the newly
elected Council, Mayor Haugen and Councilmembers Stover and Gagne.
APPOINTMENT TO COUNCIL VACANCY
RESOLUTION NO. 1-89
The Council interviewed six candidates for the vacancy on the
Council created by Haugen being elected to the Mayoral position.
Haugen moved, seconded by Gagne to appoint Leonard V. Watten to the
remainder of Haugen's two year term on the Council. Motion
carried by Roll Call Vote - 4 ayes.
Clerk Kennelly administered the Oath of Office to Leonard V. Watten.
VACANCY ON PLANNING COMMISSION
The Council will be accepting applications for the Planning Commis-
sion vacancy created by the appointment of Leonard V. Watten to the
Council. Applications will be accepted until February 9, 1989.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Haugen, Councilmembers Stover, Gagne, Brance1
and Watten.
Staff: Attorney Froberg, Engineer Norton, Administrator Vogt,
Planner Nielsen and Clerk Kennelly.
-1-
Iff
.
.
MINUTES - MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 2
.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Brancel moved, seconded by Gagne to approve the minutes of the
regular Council meeting of December 12, 1988 as written. Motion
carried - 4 ayes (Watten was not in attendance at that meeting).
Stover moved, seconded by Brancel to approve the minutes of the
Special meeting of December'19, 1988. Motion carried - 4 ayes.
1989 APPOINTMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. 2-~9
A Resolution was submitted with the list of the 1989 appointments
omitting the auditor. Administrator Vogt has received six proposals
from auditing firms for services for 1989. He suggested that the
Council set a special meeting to review the proposals.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to adopt the Resolution of appoint-
ment for 1989 omitting the auditor. Motion carried - 5 ayes by
Roll Call Vote.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
Stover stated that the Commission reviewed items 9, 10 and lIon
the Council agenda. She will report on their action as the Council
acts on the requests.
The Council and Planning Commission will be holding a special joint
meeting on Tuesday, January 17, 1989 at 7:30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
ACCEPTANCE OF UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS:
Sweetwater at Near Mountain - 3rd
Addition
Resolution No.3-89
McKinley Place at Near Mountain -
4th Addition
Resolution No.4-89
McKinley Place at Near Mountain -
5th Addition
Resolution No.5-89
Engineer Norton recommended acceptance of the underground utilities
sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer for Sweetwater 3rd
Addition and McKinley Place - 4th and 5th Additions.
.1989 GARBAGE LICENSES
RESOLUTION NO.6-89
Administrator Vogt recommended approval of granting Garbage
Haulers License for 1989 to: Chaska Sanitation, Gopher State
Trucking, Haugen's Hauling Sanitation, MJA Sanitation, R & W
Sanitation, Waste Management, Westonka Sanitation, Woodlake
Sanitary Service. and Blackowiak & Son and Rueter, Inc.
-2-
MINUTES - MO., JANUARY 9,/1989 .
PAGE 3
CONSENT AGENDA - Continue
Building Inspector ApPointment
Interviews were held by planner Nielsen for the building
inspectors position. Staff has recommended the hiring of Joe
Pazandak to the position.
Appointment of Rink Attendants
A list of this season rink attendants was submitted for appoint-
ment. (Refer to Council packet of January 9, 1989)
Designating Bonds Issued in 19~6 As Tax Exempt Obligations
It has been recommended by the Cities bonding counsel that due
to a newly adopted Tax Correction Act of the Congress, the Council
should ratify Resolution No. l65-88 adopted December 23, 1988,
designating the bonds issued as "qualified tax exempt obligations. "
TemDorarv Sian Permi~ - 24365 Smithtown Road
A temporary 4 X 8 lighted billboard has been requested to
announce the grand opening of the new Youngsteadts/Fina Store.
Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel to approve the items on the
Consent Agenda including the Resolutions as needed. Motion
carri~d - 5 ayes by Roll Call Vote.
TRAPPING CODE AMENDMENT DISCUSSION
An amendment to the current Trapping Ordinance was submitted that
would provide for other than "liVe traps" to be used by licensed
trappers subject to conditions set by the Council.
Gerri Kuester of 19660 Waterford Place was present supporting the
trapping amendment. She has experienced a loss of $l,OOO.OO in
planted trees to the beavers. She introduced John Parker, Area
Wild Life Manager of the DNR and Steve Walter as representatives
for the DNR. Mr. Walter said the State does allow for trapping
during a regular season or a special permit can be obtained out of
seasonr but the Shorewood City Ordinance prohibits the right to
trap. They discussed the various tra~s available'. Mr. Parker felt
that the conibar or leg trap properly set was safer for children
and domestic animals than the clam type live trap. Council asked
about relocation, Mr. Parker did not support transporting because
many of the animals die during transportation or die in their new
habitat -
-3-
MINUTES - MO~, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 4
.
TRAPPING CODE M1ENDMENT DISCUSSION - Continue
Jane Kline submitted new information on methods of control. She
also questioned whether all the damage, in fact, was being done
by beavers. Mr. Ocenacek of 5505 Waterford Circle has personally
seen the beavers cut down trees.
Mayor Haugen asked to table this matter in order to review the new
information submitted, and review at a special meeting to be set
for February 6th at 7:30 P.M. to hear all the pros and cons on this
subject.
COUNCIL BREAK - 8:20 P.M. to 8:32 P.M.
SET BACK VARIANCE RECONSIDERATION - YANIK - 4245 ENCHANTED LANE -
REQUEST FOR FINDINGS AND FACT ON DENIAL
Attorney David Bush was present to represent Chester Yanik in his
request for reconsideration of a set back variance. He asked the
Council to consider a compromise that he felt would meet the needs
of the City and Mr. Yanik. Mayor Haugen explained to Mr. Yanik
that if the Council turned his request down as he submitted it, he
could not return with his request for six months. In the alternative,
the Council could vote on the Planning Commissions recommendation,
if Mr. Yanik agreed with that recommendation. Mr. Bush and Mr. Yanik
did not agree to the Planning Commissions recommendation and in-
sisted that the Council vote on their original request.
The Council discussed listening to Mr. Yanik's alternative plan.
They felt it would be defeating the Planning Commissions purpose
and the recommendations included in the minutes and that any alterna-
tive plan should have been submitted when Mr. Yanik was sent back to
the Planning Commission the second time because he submitted
additional information. They stated that the building permit clearly
stated that any building outside of the building area granted by
the variance would have to be removed.
Mr. Bush offered his compromise which would allow Mr. Yanik to keep
everything he has already built. He stated that the previous deck
and screen porch existed for eight years and this is a lesser
structure.
Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel to listen to Mr. Yanik's compromise.
Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Mr. Bush explained his compromise which would involve a "permanent"
variance allowing construction up to the 35' set back line and a
"temporary" variance for the structures existing in the 35' area up
to a 28' setback line. He stated that the "temporary" variance
would mean that anything covered by the temporary variance could not
be replaced if taken down or destroyed. This temporary variance
-4-
MINUTES - MON~' JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 5
.
SET BACK VARIANCE RECONSIDERATION - YANIK - 4245 ENCHANTED LANE -
REQUEST FOR FINDINGS AND FACT ON DENIAL - Continue
could be recorded with the deed and would prohibit replacement in
that seven foot area. Mr. Bush stated that Mr. Yanik and his
builder acted in good faith by building no closer than the previ~u.;~
structure, they were not aware that the Sti~yey was not correct. ~
Council stated that the permit was issued for a 20 X 24 deck at
35' set back, it did not include a deck or gazebo. Stover feels
there is sufficient documentation to establish hardship for a
variance to 35' only.
Council then reviewed an alternative set of plans submitted by Mr.
Yanik that would require 4' of the deck and 3' into the gazebo to
be removed, which would require a variance for the deck to a 32'
set back. The gazebo is considered a structure and that would re-
quire a 50' set back.
Gagne offered a motion to allow the deck to remain upto a 32' set
back and allow the gazebo to remain, seconded by Brancel, this
would be a temporary variance to a 32' setback and permanent
variance of 35'. Stover reminded the Council that the permit did
state that the owner would remove, at his expense, any portion that
is not within the variance granted. Attorney Froberg reviewed the
criteria to be considered in granting variances. Motion failed -
2 ayes (Gagne and Brancel) - 3 nayes.
Watten moved, seconded by Stover to direct the Attorney to prepare
and return with findings of fact. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
SET BACK VARIANCE-4285 ENCHANTED LANE
RESOLUTION NO.7-89
Mr. Morgan amended his variances request by eliminating the pools
and waterfalls. The applicant will submit new drawings and has
agreed to the Planners recommendation to have his attorney draft
a protective covenant limiting new construction on the site as
shown on the attached sketch. ~~
Stover moved, seconded by Watten to grant a protectiv~v;5~ on the
lake shore side to expand a deck to include the restructure covenant
limiting construction as shown on the attached sketch. Motion
carried - 5 ayes by Roll Call Vote.
Mr. Morgan's second variance request is for a 5' variance on the
side yard line to expand his deck over an area that is unusable due
to topography. He had discussed obtaining additional property from
his neighbor if needed.
Watten moved, seconded by Gagne to grant the side yard variance with-
out additional land acquisition due to the unique topography. Motion
carried - 5 ayes by Roll Call Vote.
-5-
I
Certificate of Survey for.
Robert L. Morgan
of Lots 5 and 6. Block 1.
Enchanted Park
Hennepin County. Minnesota
.
....:~~::;.~
,
,
,
..A..... .
/'
-.-..:....
-
-"'\
..-:
" .
0.... .,._
,
.......
l,. ....... -'
..;., ~~ ..,
-\-- --,- ~~
~
,."I'~
~
/. ,,/(Eo
j'/!.')
I
('~O.
1- q-fJ.j
I here~y certify that this Is a true and correct repres-
entation or a survey of the boundaries of Lots 5 and 6. Block 1.
Enchanted Park. ~nd the location of all existing buildings thereon. It
not purport to show any other Improvements or encroachments.
does
COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC.
Dautm
("7,0)
Scale
Date
o
Existing contour
Mean sea level
Spot elevation
1 Inch = 20 feet
11-25-88
rOil marker
A...~...././ ,#".;.......?"'--
Mark S. Gronberg MN.'Llr
Enolneers. Land Surveyor:
Long Lake. Minnesota
....,~cc:
Exhibit C
PROPERTY SURVEY
j
;.I
I
,
~
~
MINUTES - MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 6
FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE-26000 SHOREWOOD OAKS DRIVE AND 26045 OAK
LEAF TRAILS - FINDINGS OF FACT
Mike Pflaum of Lundgren Bros. Construction was present to request
a variance to allow a 6' fence to extend 50' to the East and 35'
to the West of the entrance of Shorewood Oaks subdivision off of
State Highway 7. He is representing the owners in that request
due to the nuisance of noise and lights due to the traffic on
Highway 7.
~)Gagne questions the responsibility for
U~ Pflaum stated that the owners would be
~ that ~ could be used to provide the
~vI was no hardship. Watten was concerned
~,. a tunnel effect along the Highway.
~
maintaining the fence. Mike
responsible. Gagne stated
required screening so there
that the fence could create
Mayor Haugen moved, seconded by Brancel to grant the variance in
accordance with the Planners recommendation in landscape plans,
dated December 31, 1988. Motion failed - 3 ayes to 2 nays (Watten
and Gagne)
Mayor Haugen moved, seconded to have the Attorney prepare findings
of fact and return to the Council. Motion carried - 4 ayes to 1
nay (Brancel)
COMPLAINT - LAKE ACCESS OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY - HOWARDS POINT ROAD
A letter was received from the property owner being next to the
area currently being used as access to Lake Minnetonka. Mayor
Haugen spoke to the owner of the property, Neil Spaulding, he will
be putting up no trespassing signs and notifying the police to
patrol.
STAFF REPORTS
Attorneys Report
Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Resolution No.8-89
Commission Amendment to Joint Powers
Agreement
Attorney Froberg reviewed the changes to the Joint Power Agree-
ment for the Cable Commission. The changes were in regarding
to voting/quorum - numbers present to conduct business and vote.
Brancel moved, seconded by Gagne to adopt the Resolution amend-
ment to the agreement as submitted. Motion carried - 5 ayes by
Roll Call Vote.
Litigation
Attorney Froberg would like to hold an executive session to dis-
cuss the Christesen litigation following the adjournment of this
Council meeting.
-6-
MINUTES - MONiIl, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 7
.
STAFF REPORTS - Continue
Engineers Report
Purchase of Easement from Y.E.S.
Engineer'Norton received a request from Y.E.S. Properties
Partnership to take over ownership and maintenance of an ease-
ment containing a watermain that was installed in late 1988.
The cost for this easement is $32,598. Engineer Norton has re-
viewed the cost and recommends payment for the easement contain-
ing the watermain with a one year warranty from January 9, 1989.
The developer will resubmit a new plat with the easements located
and described.
Gagne moved, seconded by Watten to authorize payment in the
amount of $32,598.00 to Y.E.S. for the easements containing the
watermain subject to a one year warranty. Motion carried -
5 ayes.
Signal Communication - S.E. Area Water Tower/Pump House
Engineer Norton stated that there will be a change in the trans-
mitting equipment for the S.E. Area Water Tower and Pump House.
Due to the need for a clear site line for the use of radio
transceivers, we will be installing a lease telephone line system
instead. We will proceed with our application for a FCC permit
for use in other pumphouse locations. Cost savings is $10,000.
Shady Island Bridge - Status Report
The shims have been installed on the East end of Shady Island
Bridge. Hennepin County has revaluated the bridge and has given
permission to remove the weight restriction sign, the legal
limits are allowable now.
Planners Report
1988 Construction Report Summary
Planner Nielsen submitted a report of building activity and
valuation over the past six years. He commented on Shorewood's
average single family homes in 1988 was $185,434.00 compared
with the Twin Cities average of $132,000.
LMCD
...............
Planner Nielsen attended a subcommittee meeting discussion for
common zoning on Lake Minnetonka. They discussed using a common
denominator between City Ordinances and making allowances for less
restrictive Cities. They discussed construction of boat houses or
any other structures other than docks in the shoreline set back
areas. General consensus is in favor of permitting docks only.
-7-
, ,
MINUTES - MONJIt, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 8
.
STAFF REPORTS- Continue
Administrative Reports
Council Meeting Cable Telecasting
Cable telecasts of the Shorewood Council meetings will be at
7:30 P.M. on Wednesday following the Monday meetings.
Set Special Meeting and Executive Session
A special meeting is needed to discuss union negotiations,
comparable worth and review of audit proposals.
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to set the special meeting for
Wednesday, January 18, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. Motion carried-5 ayes.
Joint Planning Commission and Council meeting will be held on
Tuesday, January 17, 1989 at 7:30 P.M.
Equipment Bidding
Request for bids have gone out for a one-ton four wheel drive
truck and a road sweeper. Bids to be opened on Friday, January 20,
1989 at City Hall.
Hiring Status
Interviews are being held for the Senior Accounting position.
A recommendation will be made by the end of the week.
Administrators Letter of Resignation
Administrator Vogt read his letter of resignation effective
February 8, 1989. He has taken the position of City Adminis-
trator in Brainerd.
Gagne moved, seconded by Brancel to accept his letter of resig-
nation. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
Mayor Haugen stated the City has benefited from his time with
the City and wished him well.
Council discussed what hiring procedures should be taken.
Stover moved, seconded by Gagne to advertise the vacancy for two
weeks and if qualified,applicants are not found the City will
contract with a search firm at a cost not to exceed one third of
the salary. Motion carried - 5 ayes.
COUNCIL REPORTS
League of Women Voters will be holding a meeting at 7:30 P.M.,
Thursday, January 12, 1989 at City Hall.
-8-
, ,
MINUTES - MON~, JANUARY 9, 1989
PAGE 9
.
COUNCIL REPORTS-Continue
Brancel reminded the Council of a proposed meeting time limit to
10:00 P.M. due to the cable taping. She also suggested using
over head diagrams on planning issues for better understanding of
said issues.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND ADJOURNMENT
Gagne moved, seconded by Stover to adjourn the regular meeting of
January 9, 1989 at 11:05 P.M. subject to approval of claims for
payment and an executive session on litigation. Motion carried -
5 ayes.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNDS - ACCT. NO. 00-00166-02
General Liquor
Checks # 1504-1594 $ 128,118.95 $ 46,430.37
Payroll Checklist:
Checks # 202678-202719 $ 10,821.41 $ 2,919.50
TOTAL $ 138,940.36 $ 49,349.87
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Jan Haugen, Mayor
Sandra L. Kennelly
City Clerk
-9-
,
( -!J
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNVS--BILLS PAIV SINCE JANUARY 3, 1989
CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAIV
1504 (G)
1505 (G)
1506
1507 (G)
1508 (L)
1509 (L)
1510 (L)
1511 (L)
1512 (L)
1513 (L)
1514 (L)
1515 (L)
1516 (L)
1517 (L)
1518 (L)
1519 (L)
1520 (L)
1521 (L)
1522 (L)
1523 (L)
1524
1525 (G)
1526 (G&L)
1527 (G)
1528 (G)
1529 (G)
1530 (G)
1531 (G)
1532 (G)
1533 (G)
1534 (G)
1535 (G)
1536 (G)
1537 (G)
1538 (G)
1539 (G)
1540 (G)
1541 (G)
1542 (G)
U. S. Po.ldmcudeJl.
U n.iv eJrALty 0 n M-i.nne6 o.ta.
Vo-i.d
H. L. John6on Compa.ny
M-LdWe6.t Coca.-Cola. Bo.t.tting
Va.y V.i6.ttU.bwUng Co.
EaA.t S-i.de BeveJl.a.ge Co.
F~a.nk'~ T~uck-i.ng
G~gg~, COOpeJl. & .Co.
John6on B~o~. L-i.quo~ Co.
MMk VII V.i6.ttU.bu.tOM, Inc.
NOMh S.tM Ice
NOMheJl.n S.ta..te6 POWeJl.
Pa.MW & SOn6
Ed Ph..i..tUp~ & SOn6 Co.
Qua.R..Uy W-i.ne & Sp.vu:t6 Co.
Rya.n P~opeJl..t-i.e6, Inc.
SW Sub~ba.n Pub~h-i.ng
Tho~pe V.i6~wUng Co.
Weekly New~, Inc.
Vo-Ld
The Ba.nk Ex.ce1J.do~
The Ba.nk Ex.cw-i.o~
A T & T
A T & T
Am~ca.n L-i.nen Suppty Co.
Am~Va..ta.
A~~oc. On Metnopol-Lta.n
Mun.iup~e6
B~a.un Eng-i.ne~ng Te6ling
.B~own.ing-F eJl./l..i.6 I ndM.ttU.e6
C. H. CMpen.teJl. LumbeJl.
Cha.nhaA~en Lawn & SpoJc..t,o
CLty On Veepha.ven
CLty On Ex.cw-i.o~
CLty On Mound
V.R. Cop-i.eJl. SeJl.v-i.ce, Inc.
F~obeJl.g & penbe4thy, P.A.
GeneJl.a.l. Commun.ica.tion6, Inc.
GOVeJl.nmen.t F-i.na.nce Onn-i.CeJrA
M~oc.
PURPOSE
Po-6.ta.ge
Sem-i.nM/P~o.tective In6pection6
COn6~ction Pm.t. #3 & F-i.na.t
Sea.l. Coa.ting-P~ojec.t 88-1
Pop p~chaAe6
M.i6c. & BeeJl. P~chaAe6
B eeJl. p~chaA e6
L-i.quo~ & W-i.ne P~chaA U
L-i.quo~ & W-i.ne P~chaA u
W-Lne p~chaAe6
BeeJl. p~chaAU
M.i6 c. P~chaA e6
U~U
W-i.ne P~chaA e6
W-i.ne p~chaA e6
W-i.ne p~chaA U
Ja.nuMY 1989 Ren.t
Adv~-i.ng
B eeJl. P~chaA U
Adv~-i.ng
FEV & FICA-Pa.y~otl 12/20/88
FEV & FICA-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
u:U.R.1.liu-PubUc WO~~
u~u-CLty Ha.tl
La.undny-CLty Ha.tl & GMa.ge
P~n.teJl. R-i.bbOn6
YeaJr.1.y M embeJrA h-Lp Vue6
Sha.dy I~la.nd B~dge SummMY
Chem-Lca.l. Toilw-PM~
LumbeJl.-P.C.1.
Cha.-Ln Saw P~-PubUc Wo~~
Slip-i.ng nO~ 1988
1~.t QuaJc..teJl. F ~e Con:tJta.c.t
1~.t QuaJc..teJl. F~e Con.tMc.t
QuaJc..teJl.l!f Co n.tMc.t B~ng
A.t.to~ney Feu n o~ Vec. 1988
Rep~ 2 Ra.d-i.o~-PubUc Wo~~
Sub~~plion-F-i.na.nce
-1-
AMOUNT
$ 750.00
90.00
11,504.00
518.30
1,998. 69
8,181.15
189.00
1,132.03
909.27
6,950.40
95.50
201.72
97.28
536.49
1,083.42
1,922.58
550.30
8,382.25
444.00
199.04
4,091.95
22.73
5.32
289.92
110.07
1,148.00
426.15
21.42
40.33
103.20
424.52
16,738.75
1,377.25
30.00
6,306.70
152.30
55.00
('
~
.
.
CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAIV
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNVS--BILLS PAIV SINCE JANUARY 3, 1989
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
1543 (G)
1544 (G)
1545 (G)
1546 (G)
1547 (G)
1548 (G)
1549 (G)
1550 (G)
1551 (G)
1552 (G)
1553 (G)
1554 (G)
1555 (G)
1556 (G)
1557 (G)
1558 (G)
1559 (G)
1560 (G&L)
1561 (G)
1562 (G)
1563 (G)
1564 (G)
1565 (G)
1566 (G)
1567 (G)
1568 (G)
1569 (G)
1570 (G)
1571 (G&L)
1572 (G)
1573 (G)
1574 (G)
1575 (G&L)
1576 (G)
1577 (G)
1578 (G&L)
1579 (G)
1580 (L)
1581 (L)
Hennep-i.n Coun.ty T~eM~eJl.
Hennep-i.n Coun.ty T~eM~eJl.
Hennep-i.n Coun.ty T~eM~eJl.
HR Ma.na.gemen.t
KAR P ~oduc:t6
Sa.ndna. K ennetly
La.ke M.tka.. Con6eJl.va..t-i.on V.i6.t.
Long La.ke Fo~d T~a.c.to~, Inc.
H. C. Ma.yeJl. & SOn6, Inc,
MedCen.teJrA Hea.l..th CMe, Inc.
Me.tnopol-L.ta.n WM.te Con:tJtol
M-i.dwe6.t An.ima.l. SeJl.v-i.cu, Inc.
MN GOVeJl.nmen.t F -i.na.nce
On n-i.CeJrA A~~n.
MN CLty Ma.na.gemen.t A~~oc.
MN S.tJz.ee.t Sup~n.tenden:t6
M~oc.
MunLtech, Inc.
NOMheJl.n S.ta.tu POWeJl.
Phy~-i.Ua.n6 Hea.l..th Pla.n
Judy QUa.M
Sou.th La.ke M-i.nne.tonka.
Public Sa.n e.ty VepM.tmen.t
U S We6.t Commun.ica..t-i.on6
Wa.teJl. P ~oduc:t6 Compa.ny
M e.tno pol-L.ta.n WM:te Co n:tJtol
Public Employeu R~emen.t
CLty Coun.ty C~edLt Un.ion
AFSCME Loca.l. #224
Child SUppOM Enno~cemen.t
leMA R~emen.t Co~p.
Comm.i6~-i.oneJl. On Revenue
Na.tiona.i Ca.meJl.a. Ex.cha.nge
S.ta.te on M-i.nnuo.ta. T~eaA~eJl.
Comm.i6~-i.oneJl. On Revenue
Public Employee6 R~emen.t
Public Employeu R~emen.t
COn6btuction Boo~.to~e
M-i.nne6 o.ta. Mu.tua.l. L-i.n e
P et.ty CM h
Bellboy Co~po~a.tion
Va.y V.i6.ttU.bwUng Co.
Coun.ty ChMge no~ Speua.l $
A~~ u~men:t6
PWoneJl. Ex.pen6e nO~ Nov. 1988
P 0-6.ta.l. V ~n -i.ca..t-i.o n6
CompMa.ble WOMh S.tudy
M.i6c. P~-PubLic Wo~~
F-i.na.i Milea.ge no~ 1988
ShMe On 1989 Budge.t
P~-PubLic WO~~
V-i.uel Fuel-Public Wo~~
Employeu Hea.l..th In6~a.nce
no~ Ja.n. 1989 & 1988 AdjM.tmen.t
Ja.nuMy 1989 SeweJl. SeJl.v-i.ce Chg~.
VecembeJl. 1988 An.ima.l. Con:tJtol
1989 MembeJrAh-Lp Renewa.l-F-i.na.nce
1989 MembeJrAh-Lp Renewa.l-Adm-i.n.
1989 MembeJrAh-Lp-PubLic WO~~
Ja.nuMY 1989 Wa.teJl. & SeweJl. Ma.-Ln.t.
U~u
Ja.nuMY 1989 Employee Hea.l..th In6.
Clea.n.ing & SuppLie6-CLty Ha.tl
J a.nuMY 19 89 Budg e.t
U~e6
P~-Wa.teJl. Vep.t.
VecembeJl. 1988 SAC ChMgU
AdcUUona.t L-i.n e I n6~a.nce
C~edLt Un.ion-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
Un.ion Vuu-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
Child SUPPOM-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
ICMA-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
S.ta.te Ta.x.-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
Slide P~ojec.to~-P~o.t. In6pemon6
BuilcUng PeJtmLt S~chMge RepoM
S.ta.te Ta.x.-AdjM.tmen.t 1988
PERA-Pa.y~otl 1/4/89
PERA-AdjM.tmen.t 1988
Book-P~o.tective In6pection6
Ja.n.'89 Acuden.t & S-i.cknu~ In6.
M.i6 c. SuppLiu
L-i.quo~ P~ChM e6
BeeJl. & M.i6c. P~chMe6
-2-
63.45
72.00
41. 10
420.00
136.34
20.46
8,913.00
10.76
463.12
1,323.30
21,841.07
541.58
10.00
35.00
20.00
4,917.00
804.16
3,120.00
274.23
29,190.99
169.63
36.83
5,989.50
18.00
37.00
97.20
145.00
320.00
727.99
375.75
3,486.33
27.61
1,230.14
69.96
172.45
104.40
36.95
1 , 691. 64
2,340.64
/,"
,
,
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNVS--BILLS PAIV SINCE JANUARY 3, 1989
CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAIV PURPOSE AMOUNT
1582 ( L) Fftan.k.'~ Tftuc.k.-i..n.g L-i..quoft & W-i..n.e. PuJtc.hM e..6 $ 374.40
1583 (L) G & K Se.Jtv-i..c.e..6 La.un.dJr.y 61. 80
1584 (L) GJt-i..gg~, Coope.Jt & Co. L-i..quoft & W-i..n.e. PuJtc.hM e..6 1,904.66
1585 (L) Johnoon. Bfto~. L-i..quoft Co. L-i..quoft & W-i..n.e. puJtc.h<Ul e..6 2,453.50
1586 (L) M-i..n.n.e..6 om V -i..c.:toJt-i..a. O-i..l Co. Fuel O-i..l 123.12
1587 (L) Pe.p~-i..-Cola. Co. Pop PuJtc.h<Ul e..6 196.10
1588 (L) Ed Ph-i..lUp~ & Sono L-i..quoft & W-i..n.e. PuJtc.h<Ul e..6 406.69
1589 (L) P ogfte.ba V-iA:tJt-i..buling, In.c.. B e.e.Jt & M-iA c.. puJtc.h<Ul e..6 2,184.20
1590 ( L) Qua1..-i..t:y W-i..n.e. & Sp~ Co. W-i..n.e. PuJtc.hM e..6 233.84
1591 (L) Roya.l Cftown. Be.vVtage. Co. Pop PuJtc.h<Ul e..6 177 .40
1592 Vo-i..d
1593 (G) Se.no-i..ble. Lan.d U~e. Co~on. Se.m-i..n.a.Jt-Plan.n.-i..n.g & Z 0 n.-i..n.g 30.00
1594 (L) W<Ul-te. Man.ag e.m e.n.:t - Sav ag e. W<Ul-te. Re.moval.. 30.00
T o-tal.. Ge.n.Vta.l
T o-ta.l L-i..quoft
128,118.95
46,430.37
TOTAL
174,549.32
-3-
I'
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNVS--BILLS PAIV SINCE JANUARY 3, 1989
CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAIV PURPOSE AMOUNT
202678 Vo-id $
202679 V o-id
202680 V o-id
202681 (G) Kwti S:tov~ Council 150.00
202682 (G) Van-iel J. Vog:t 80 Reg. HouM 1,187.93
202683 (G) Sandtta L. Kenne.tty 80 Reg. HOuM 747.02
202684 (G) S~an A. N-ieeum 80 Reg. HouM 476.50
202685 (G) Anne P. La:t:t~ 151.50 Reg. HouM 471 . 44
202686 (G) Man J. Ro.tek 80 Reg. HOuM 813.75
202687 (G) B~ad.te.y J. N-iet6 en 80 Reg. HouM 855.33
202688 (G) Pa:tUe-ia R. Helguen 80 Reg. HouM 640.32
202689 (G) B~ad.tey J. N-iet6 en Mo:to~ Veh-ide 125.37
202690 (G) ChM.iu S. Vav~ 147 Reg. HouM 467.13
202691 (G) Ven~ V. JohMon 4 O.T. HouM 46.08
202692 (G) Van-iel J. Rancla.U 91.50 Reg. HouM 760.13
202693 (G) How~d V. S~k 86 Reg. HouM 598.46
202694 (G) Ralph A. weh.te 89 Reg. HouM 596.60
202695 (Gl Vonald E. Zdttazil 80 Reg. HouM 852.25
202696 (G) Jo~eph P. Lugow~ki 90.50 Reg. HouM 735.45
202697 (G) MM:te.y Jakel 78 Reg. HouM 357.68
202698 (G) B~n Jakel 15 Reg. HouM 81. 30
202699 (Gl Vonald R. Ab~ueh 81. 50 Reg. HouM 356.45
202700 (G) Seo:t:t S. H~kiM 5.50 Reg. HouM 27.10
202701 ( L) C~:tophe Sehm-id 61.50 Reg. HouM 231.55
202702 ( L) John F. Thomp~on 23.50 Reg. HouM 117.39
202703 (L) M-ic.hael J. KoebeM ky 38 Reg. HouM 172.33
202704 (L) B~n V. Jakel 38.50 Reg. HouM 174.27
202705 (L) MM:tey W. Jakel 2.50 Reg. HouM 12.32
202706 (L) John F. Jo~epMon 21.50 Reg. HouM 104.64
202707 (L) WilUam F. Jo~epMon 80 Reg. HouM 572.75
202708 (L) S~an M. La:t:t~n~ 36 Reg. HouM 156.20
202709 ( L) C~:tophe J. Me.y~ 4 Reg. HouM 19.71
202710 ( L) Vean H. Young 80 Reg. HouM 522.68
202711 ( Ll Seo:t:t B. Bennyhonn 26 Reg. HouM 119.15
20271 2 ( L) Seo:t:t M. B~e:t:t 30.50 Reg. HouM 143.25
202713 ( L) Jamu A. SheU.edy 2.50 Reg. HouM 12.32
202714 ( L) Vav-id A. Pe.:te.Mon 34 Reg. HouM 140.67
202715 ( L) Van-iel V. H~ken 40.50 Reg. HouM 182.02
202716 ( Ll WilUam F. Rhodu 55 Reg. HouM 238.25
-4-
J' :
.
.
GENERAL & LIQUOR FUNVS--BILLS PAIV SINCE JANUARY 3, 1989
CHECK NO. TO WHOM PAIV
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
$
177 . 30
147.82
150.00
202717 (Gl Ja.ni..c.e M. Ha.u.gen
202718 (G) Ba./tba./ta. J. Blta.nc.e.l.
202719 (G) Robe.Jt:t L. Ga.gne, JIt.
Ma.yolt
Counc.il.
Counc.il.
T o;ta.,t G eneJl.a.,t
T o;ta.,t Li..quolt
TOTAL
T o;ta.i. GeneJl.a.,t
T o;ta.,t Li..quolt
TOTAL
-5-
10,821.41
2,919.50
13,740.91
138,940.36
49,349.87
188,290.23
CITY OF SHOREWoeb
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18, 1989
~OUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
The Special Council meeting of the Shorewood City Council was
called to order at 7:40 P.M., Wednesday, January 18, 1989, in
the Council Chambers by Mayor Haugen.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Haugen, Councilmembers Stover, Gagne and Watten
Absent: Councilmember Brancel
Staff: Administrator Vogt and Finance Director Rolek
EXECUTIVE SESSION - UNION NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND COMPARABLE
WORTH
The Council went into Executive Session at 7:45 P.M. to discuss
union negotiation strategies and comparable worth. This sessicn
was tape recorded.
The Executive Session closed at 9:45 P.M.
CONSIDERATION OF AUDIT PROPOSALS
Finance Director Rolek reviewed the proposals received by the City
to perform audit services. Proposals were received from Gary
Lundeen Company; Jim Maiser; Abdo, Abdo, and Eick; Voto Tautgez,
Redpath and Company and Pannell, Kerr and Forster. The City Council
and staff discussed the proposals and the services to be provided
by each provider. Gary Lundeen Company and Jim Maiser were eliminated.
Staff then recommended Abdo, Abdo and Eick stating that if each
proposer could do the job, cost became the determining factor.
Gagne moved, seconded by Haugen, to appoint the firm of Pannell, Kerr
and Forster. Gagne felt that the size of the firm and their re-
lationship with several metro area Cities were the main reasons for
this motion. Motion failed - 2 ayes (Gagne and Watten) 2 nays
(Haugen and Stover)
Watten moved, seconded by Stover to appoint the firm of Abdo, Abdo
and Eick to perform the City's audit. Motion carried - 4 ayes.
COMPARABLE WORTH DISCUSSION
The Council discussed the presentations relative to comparable
worth heard earlier in this meeting by Karen Olsen and Jim Schultz.
The Council indicated that although Karen Olsen is doing an excellent
-1-
/8
I
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
January 18, 1989
Cigarette License Renewal
The following listed applications for the 1989 Cigarette License have
been received and paid for. I recommend that these licenses be approved
for issuance. A resolution will be drafted after approval.
Country Kitchen
Snyders Drug Stores
Shorewood I.C.O.
Driskill's Super Valu
American Legion Post 259
Skipperette
Shorewood Food Mart
Sincerely,
~~{r
Sandra Kennelly
City Clerk
SK/al
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
-<//1
MEMO TO:
FROM:
VATE:
SUBJECT:
.
.
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
Mayoll. and CUy Council.
Ai Rolek U/f---
Janu.aJuj 18, '1989
Appo~ntment on Bookkeepell.
A6 you know, Jean SOll.en.6on ll.e..6~gned hell. pO.6U[on wUh ;the CUy
~ Vec.embell.. S~c.e tha;t .tUne the pO.6U[on hM been adve.Jl..t)Aed
and appUc.a.:U.oYL6 have been ll.ec.uved. The appUc.a.:U.oYL6 have
been ll.ev~ewed and ~ntell.V~ew.6 wUh pvwpemve appUc.an.t.6 have
been c.onduc..ted. At thAA .tUne U i...6 ll.ec.ommended ;the Council.
ll.a:ti..nY the pll.oba:UonaJl.y appo~ntment on Li...6a Bll.own to the
pO.6U[on on Bookkeepell. a;t an houJl.ly wage on $8.00. Li...6a hM
agll.eed to beg~n wOll.k on FebJtu.aJty 6, 1989.
ThAA Uem appe.aJL6 on YOu.Jt COYL6ent Agenda on the Janualty 23 mee;Ung
noll. YOu.Jt c.OYL6~ell.a:ti..on.
PleMe let me know ~n you have any QUe..6UOYL6 pMOll. to Monday
~g ht.
AR/g.6
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~i'
SHOREWOOD
MEMO: Cigaret te License
TO: Council
FROM: City Clerk
DATE: Jan. 23, 1989
Please add Minnetonka Country Club to the
list for cigarette licenses on the Consent
Agenda. This applications was just 'received
today.
Tha4
.
,
OSM Orr
, I. . ..' Schelen
, . .'.. , Maye~n&
Assooates, InC.
.
JAN 1 7 1989
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Surveyors
Planners
December 28.; 1988
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, Minnesota 55331
Re : Bad~er Field Water Main and ApPurtenant Work
Project No. 88-3
OSM COITIIII. No. 4229
Ci tv Cound 1 :
Enclosed are four (4) copies of Construction Pava~nt Voucher No. 2 & Final on the referenced project in the alount of
$ 3,370.42.
Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the
materials are satisfactory and the work properly perforled in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Upon receipt of affidavit, State of Minnesota Form 134. and also Receipt and Waiver of Lien Ri~hts from
F.F. Jedlicki, Inc., please lake paYment to F.F. Jedlicki.Inc., 14203 West 62nd St., Eden Prairie, Mn. 55346
at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours.
ffiR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
J- -P 1~
James P. Norton,P.E.
Project En~ineer
..fN: RGD
Enclosures :
c( : F.F. ~~dlicki. Inc.
-4/~.
..
.
.
Estimate Voucher No.
2 II Final
COOSTROCTIOO PAYIENT YW:IER
Date
December 28. 1988
For Period Endin~ :
December 23. 1988
Project No.
88-3
Class of Work :
Bad~er Field Water "'in and Appurtenant Work
To: F.F. Jedlicki. Inc.
14203 West 62nd Street
Eden Prairie, "no 5534b6
(612) 934-7272
location f:
For
'.
'.
City of Shorewood. Hennepin County. Minnesota
A. 'Ori~inal Contract Amount
$
23.030.00
B. Total Additions
$
0.00
C. Total Deductions
$
0.00
D. Total Funds Encumbered
$
23.030.00
E. Total Value of Work Certified to Date
$
22.692.41
F. Less Retained Percenta~e
7.
$
0.00
G. Less Total Previous PaYments
$
19,321.99
H. Approved for PaYment. This Report
$
3,370.42
I. Total PaYments Includin~ This Voucher
$
22.692.41
J. Balance Carried Forward
$
337.59
APPROVALS
_________ V". t
=
=
===--=9=
(m-SCl-ELEN-MYERON &: ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pursuant to our field observation. as performed in accordance with our contract, we hereby certify that the materials
are satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with th@ plans and specifications and that the total
~ork is 100 X completed as of December 23, 1988 . We hereby recommend paYlent of this voucher.
- Si'Md~-R~
Si~ned :
Construction Observer
This is to certify that to the best of DY knowledse, information, and belief, the quantities and v
certified herein is a fair approxiHte estiRte for the peri,'d COVf"~ . s voucher.
Contractor: F.F. Jedlicki. Inc. SiSned ~.
------ -- .
Date: _-?d - ,,=? 0_ -~_____ Title
~------::
Ci tv of
Voucher
Checked BY :
Shorewood
Approved for pavaent
Authorized Representative
Date
Date
----~--------------------
Pue 1 of 2
4229
.'
.
Estilate Voucher No.
2 &I Final
e
Date: Deceaber 28, 1988
Contractor: F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.
14203 West 62nd Street
Eden Prairie. ""a 553466
(612) 934-7272
Bad~er Field Water ~in and Appurtenant Work
Project No. 88-3
for the
City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Contract Date : Septeaber 21. 1988
Work Coapleted : Deceabtr 23, 1988
Work Started
Coapletion Date :
Septeaber 21. 1988
Ten (10) Workin~ DayS
SPec. No.
Itell
Work COlllpeted
Contract This Aaount
Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price Month This Month
Total to Date
Quantity Total Price
Water ~in
0504.602 12" CRS Gate Valve and Box 1 Ea. 800.00 800.00
0504.602 12- Retainer Glands 17 Ea. 40.00 680.00
0504.602 12- D.I.P. Class 50 1II1 Poly Wrap 425 L.F. 36.00 15300.00
0504.620 Fittin~s 1700 Lbs. 2.00 3400.00
Std Spec Granular Foundation Material 150 Ton 6.00 900.00
2211.501 A~Sre~ate Base. Class 5 (1007. crushed
Rock) 2SO Ton 7.00 1750.00
2575.505 Soddin~ (Incl. "in. 4- Black Dirt) 50 S.Y. 4.00 200.00
-----
T ota 1 ..................................................... $ 23,030.00
Pa~e 2 of 2
4229
0.00 1 800.00
0.00 17 680.00
0.00 425 15300.00
0.00 1700 3400.00
0.00 26.49 158.94
336.21 2353.47 336.21 2353.47
0.00 0.00
--- ------
$ 2.353.47 $ 22,692.41
.
os;\\. Orr
Schelen
. .. ....! Mayer?n&
Associates, Ine.
.
JAN I 8 1989
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis. MN 55413
612-331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engineers
Survevors
Planners
January 17. 1989
Ci tv of $horewood
5755 Country Club Rd.
Shorewood. "innesota 55331
Re : Shady Island Bridse Repair and APpurtenant Work
Project No. 88-3
Wt COM. No. 4219
Ci tv Cound 1 :
Enclosed are four (4) copies of Construction PaYatnt Voucher No. 2 & Final on the referenced project in the aaount of
$ 1.194.00.
Pursuant to our field observation. as perforaed in accordance with our contract. we hereby certify that the
aaterials are satisfactory and the work properly perforaed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
UPon receipt of affidavit. State of "innesota Fori 134. and also Receipt and Waiver of Lien Rishts frOl
Park Construction Co.. please like ,aYlent to Park Construction COIPany. 7900 Beech St. N.E.. "inneapolis. "no
at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours.
ORR-SOELEN-rIAYERCfi
II ASSOCIATES. n<<:.
d::-:rt~./I~
Project Ensinetr
~:RGD
Enclosures :
c( : Park Construction COI,any
ijO
Estiaate Voucher No.
2..
(DSTRlCTI~ PAYIOTee
Date
January 17. 1989
For Period Endin~ :
Dtcnber 30, 1988
Project No.
88-3
Cl ass of Work :
ShadY Island Brid~e Repair and APpurtenant Work
Location
Shady Island
To: Parle Construction Cgpany
7900 Beech Street N.E.
"inneapolis. "no 55432
(612) 786-9800
For
City of Shorewood, Hennepin County, "innesota
A. Ori~inal Contract AIount
$
8. Total Additions
$
C. Total Deductions
$
D. Total Funds Enculbered
20. 080. 00
E. Total Value of Work Certified to Date
F. Less Retained Percenta~e
G. Less Total Previous PaYaents
H. ApProved for PaYaent, This Report
I. Total PaYltnts Includins This Voucher
20.080.00
J. Balance Carried Forward
0.00
IlPPROVIl.S
le~
~-SOELEtHtA~ Ie .ASSOCIATES. INC.
Pursuant to our field observation. as performed in accordance with our contract. we hereby certify that the aaterials
are satisfactory and the work properly perforled in accordance with the plans and specifications and that the total
work is 100 X cOIPleted as of Deceaber 30. 1988 . We hereby recollend paYment of this voucher.
Si"'d~ P y~
SUned :
Construction Observer
This is to certify that to the best of IV knowled~e, inforaation. and belief. the quantities and values of work
certified herein is a fair approxiaate estiaate for the period covered bY this voucher.
Contractor : Park Construction COIPanY Si~ned BY
Date :
Title
City of
Voucher
Checked BY :
Shorewood
APproved for paYltnt
Authorized Representative
Date
Date
Pa~e 1 of 2
4219
. Esti.,te Voucher No. 2 . Final.
Date: JanuarY 17, 1989
cwctor :
Part Construction CoaPany
7900 Beech Street N.E.
"inneapo1is, ~. 55432
(612) 786-9800
Shady Island Brid~e Repair and APpurtenant Work
Project No. 88-3
for the
Cih of Shorewood, Hennepin County, "innesota
Contract Date : October 28, 1988
Work Co.,leted : Nove.ber 22, 1988
Work Started : Noveuer 1, 1988
Co.pletion Date : 21 DayS
Itea
No. Ite.
Wort Co.pleted
Contract This Alount
Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price "onth This "onth
Total to Date
Quantity Total Price
1) Co.,letion of the brid.e repair, except for
ite. no. 2
2) Furnsihin! and Installin! Steel H Piles,
in place and below cutoff, as specified
240 L.F.
t L.S.
~.OO
8880.00
8880.00
0.00 1 11000.00
0.00 1 8880.00
$ 0.00 $ 19,880.00
200.00 200.00
$ 200.00 $ 20,080.00
t L.S.
11000.00
11000.00
Total ....................................................$ 19,880.00
Extra .ork IPproved by City Coucil on 12/12/88
( Installin~ shias on east side of brid~e ) 200.00
Total to Date ............................................$ 20,080.00
Pa.e 2 of 2
4219
COUNCIL MINUTES- MONDAY, JULY 25, 1988
PAGE 2
Discussion of Geese Problem-Enchanted Island
Mrs. Carley Ferguson of 4320 Enchanted Drive was present to ask
the Council for help to eliminate an excess of 200 geese on her
property. She has contacted people from the DNR, Department of
Agriculture and Dr. James Cooper of the University of Minnesota.
A Dr. James Cooper of the University explained the procedures to
get the DNR to help in a round up and transportation. A public
hearing must be set and held by the local governing body. Vogt
has also received a complaint from Christmas Lake. The DNR
normally charges a $1,000.00 per location to transport the geese.
Mrs. Ferguson would like the Council to ask for support from
Mound and Minnetrista to share the expense. Gagne suggested that
residents along Timber Lane also be notified of the public hearing
when it is set. Dr. Cooper has agreed to attend the public hearing.
Mrs. Ferguson asked for a permit to shoot the geese from her deck
under the supervision of Mr. Steve Wolter of the DNR. He will
patrol in the lake to warn boaters. Attorney Froberg referred to
the Ordinance that does not allow any provisions to allow issuing
a shooting permit. Council took no action to amend the Ordinance.
Vacate Drainaqe and Utility Easements Resolution #83-88
Sweetwater at Near Mountain, Lots 1
& 2, Block 2
Mayor Rascop opened a public hearing at 7:53 P.M. to hear a re-
quest from Mike Pflaum of Lundgren Bros. to vacate utility and
drainage easement in order to combine Lots 1 and 2 of Sweetwater
at Near Mountain in order to combine the two lots. Nielsen
suggested that the combination should be done first after asking
for public comment and receiving done. Rascop closed the public
hearing at 7:55 P.M.
Haugen moved, seconded by Stover to approve the vacation of the
utility and drainage easementand proof of the combination of Lots
1 and 2 prior to releasing the Resolution approving the vacation.
Motion carried by Roll Call Vote - 5 ayes.
Presentation from Hennepin County Health Department -Georqe Bowlin
Mr. Bowlin presented a slide show on the services offered by the
Health Department; help nursing service; alternative care service;
women health help service; children health screening; child care
consultation; immunization; international travel immunization;
communicable disease; red door clinic; health assessment promotion
service; medical and dental assessment for refugees; lifeguard
program; emergency medical; environmental health and well water
testing.
Council asked about organizations used for contracted service.
They had concerns for the homeless and questioned why more people
were not being helped. Council thanked Mr. Bowlin for his
presentation.
-2-
s
.JMI'~
... I'IIJV"-'
Excelsior,
JanU6r,y.
1 +- ~";:.
_s ...; c-'
e-'
.
Te t~e Eoncrable ~ayor8 K~. Jen 2eu~en,
hr. 2obe~t 2asccp ana ~emoer3 of tbe
Couc~l for tfle City Gf ~horewcod
:..:. : 'Us e cf eS5 e~en t to tt2€ la~.."
known ~5 let: en ~u~utors
Subdivion ~lat 367 and locateci
::n ~:ovJC:3rds. ~cint ?cat adjacent
to t~e prc;erty vi under~i~ne~.
Lau~ea an~ Gentlemen,
--. : Y' '"' Q t', e t c r"e t~- e 1 .-. '. ~ '.1" -= -'" .-1 ' ,.; .,.J.... +'")'>" .-, e ,., ov~.... ::; n,-,v.= ma nt...: r,'"'., e ~ea ~-, e_~Q,- ~n-r
~.J..J.J.~:- .... ....~ .... _a~,-~ _ "c:.... _'-__.... ;.: ~_'-'~ ..... c--:.' __~ .... '-_ _.... _ __. _ _ _ ...
!:cS ceen u~eQ. as a ",:uoJ...:..c ccceS6 b~.r D~ni..L~"'eG.s cr C3~C:=, -cl"'UC~a,S, ;nC\',,'!1}C O':'.LS;.3
... ...
en~ even ~une bU5gies ~~y an~ n~g~t! =t ~s ~lsc used by several CErs fr~~
~nc~anted I~land as a stcrtc~t from ~here to .wcr~ anti bacl(.
: have contccted tIle tax;ayer ~f said ease~ent, )Ir. ~eil s;auliing several
t~mes to ask him to ~ut a sto~ to the unauthorized use Gf ttis crivate
~'-~-went -,.,~~ -"u-":n-7 u":.~ ~.: -'Y'\-:' ;n-'; ~ ,...,-,~ ',.., c....' ~ f'c-f1'"'e 1...,.. ,,"'-'ul-"':""';:- ""'r"m:~ed
_Q,CIt: J U" ~ ul..l....i. C .:...... ~ ~c.J..i....: ....... ~ ::2 .......l,....c.. ...L..... ... d .... _.....\,., . J,........ 1....>~-O -....._...O:.,J v ....._
to do so, but as of tOQ.27 nct~inf:' ha3 1::een acne about it.
" - - "-
Tne constant traffic day ani night constitutee 8 nuisance, to say netting
of t~e fact t~a t cars and trucJ.s ;ar:t:_ rignt in front of my lari:estcre, vJhich
is but a fey.; feet away f!'om mv :'1ouse. : am also at:-~;alleci at t~1e Ii tte!' ttat
<:;~+:::.: 'ef'i: be;,inc.' 0'" ;:-e+Q t--"'")'>""~iY'l :n m-;' ,1::::")'>ri ;.'a~'e-"''''--~l~st-.(c 'cee1"'h~'Tt-'e""
0-....- -. -..v ......- .J.. c......... ""'..._v......L~ - ..,i .:.__...... _,,;;. _, .:;-__ 0.1_, _VVvv..L.......,
tincans an~ even teilet~a]er: Tbree ti~e3 alread~ : have collected two big
tarasa bags full cf t~at unsavorv l~t-cer from cv ~ard as well es fro~ tae
e-~~~~Y'+~ ~" ~
c_ _.....C...l v.
In view of all tn~s, if tte easement con~~nues to be usea as a :ublic acce~s
1 would t~1in~'~, that it lC':Je:os t~'1e salesvalue of rr:'i ~cro-certy C0nS~Qera OJ..-;.
:2"o:r:~ if til~S f':ccbleIll is not 301.J"eJ. ."tl~e secner tt.e bet-cer, it \\iill continue
8um~er and wln~er!
8onse~uently .: would request that m;)' fTo;e2'ty srlOuld be re-evaluated, as
my estimated marAet val~e of my property fo!' 198b was raised to ~ 104,000
from the value of 1967 of ~ 93,00C, which is a jump of over ~lC,COC and in
my estimation totally excessive! And completely unwarranted considering t~e
;cllution of the laKe and ti:e structural deteriorat~on of my 2 bedroom home,
~art cf which was an old summercabin of undetermined age, but cIder than
1951, whi~h was remodeled in 1953.
: jcpe, that with your hel; this easement ;roblec can be solved to everybody'
satisfaction, who ha2 an interest in said easement.
3.incerel,y YOUFS,
Jk.l~~i. M~tU~r~~
~aud ~. E. Wadsworth
5~60 Eowards Point Road
Excelsior, ~inn. 55331
~ele;boon: 474-7807,
~-
~;i
SI-IOREWOOD
MEMO: Cigarette License
DATE: Jan. 23, 1989
TO: Counci I
FROM: City Clerk
PI.ase add Minnetonka Country Cluu to the
list for cigarette licenses on the Consent
Agenda. This applications was just -received
today. ..
Thank You,
~~
..
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING A SETBACK VARIANCE TO
CHESTER YANIK
WHEREAS, Chester Yanik (Applicant) desires to construct a deck
and gazebo at the rear of his home located at 4245 Enchanted Lane in the
City of Shorewood; and
WHEREAS, the locations of the proposed deck and gazebo do not
comply with the lakeshore setback requirements of the Shorewood Zoning
Code, and Applicant has therefore made application for variances; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application reviewed
by the Planning Commission on 6 December 1988, and, after deliberation,
the Planning Commission prepared a recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Applicant appeared before the City Council at their
regular meeting held on 12 December 1988 and submitted additional
information concerning his application which he asked the Council to
consider, whereupon the Council referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission for consideration of the additional information; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application and the
additional information submitted by the Applicant at their regular meeting
held on 3 January 1989 and, after due deliberation, prepared their
recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further reviewed the application and.
the recommendations of the Planning Commission at their regular meeting
held on 9 January 1989; and
WHEREAS, after due deliberation and-a review of the criteria
required for the granting of a variance, the Council failed to approve a
motion to grant the requested variances, and the City Attorney was
directed to prepare a resolution setting forth Findings and Conclusions
denying the Applicant's request for variances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
\
1
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the subject property is located in a lake shore zoning
district which requires a 50-foot rear-yard setback.
2. That a variance permitting the construction of a deck
extending up to 35 feet from the lake shore had been previously granted to
the Applicant in 1981.
3. That Applicant now requests a variance to permit construction
of a deck up to 28 feet from the shoreline and for the construction of a
gazebo to extend up to approximately 35 feet from the shoreline.
4. That Applicant's request requires an 18-foot rear - yard
setback variance for the deck, which is 3 feet greater than the previous
variance of 15 feet which was granted to Applicant in 1981, and the
application requires an approximate 15 foot rear - yard setback variance
for the construction of the gazebo.
5. That on 3 November 1988 Applicant was issued a building
permit containing the following conditions:
Permit is issued subject to all work being done within
the buildable area of the lot as prescribed by the
Shorewood Zoning Ordinance and previously approved setback
variance.
Setbacks to be verified by updated survey to be
submitted no later than 14 November (1988).
Any work found to encroach within the required setback
will be corrected by owner.
7. That Applicant subsequently constructed a deck and gazebo on
the property which extended beyond the _ limits of the prior approved
setback variance.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the variances requested by the Applicant constitute a
substantial deviation from the requirements of the Shorewood Zoning Code.
2. That the property can be put to a reasonable use and a deck
can be constructed on the property under the conditions imposed by the
Shorewood Zoning Code and pursuant to the 15-foot rea r - yard setback
variance previously granted to Applicant.
..
3. That the present plight of the Applicant is due to
circumstances created by the Applicant and is not a result of
circumstances unique to the property.
4. That Applicant has not met the criteria for the grant of a
variance under Section 1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has not
established an undue hardship as defined by Minn. Stat. Section 462.357,
Subd. 6 ( 2) .
5. That Applicant's request for the variances set forth above
are hereby denied.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 23d day of
January, 1989.
Jan Haugen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk
Roll Call Votes:
Ayes -
Nays -
~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO
LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
WHEREAS, Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. (Applicant) has
requested a fence height variance for Lot 21, Block 5, and Lot 4, Block 3
in the Shorewood Oaks Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and the application reviewed
by the Planning Commission on 3 January 1989, and after due deliberation,
the Planning Commission prepared a recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Applicant appeared before the City Council at their
regular meeting held on 9 January 1989 and presented his application; and
~REAS, after due deliberation the City Council failed to
approve a motion to grant the requested variance, and the Council
thereupon directed the City Attorney to prepare Findings and Conclusions
denying the Applicant's request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Shorewood as follows:
FINDrnGSOFF~T
1. That the subject property is located in an R-1C. zoning
district which requires fences to be limited to a height of four (4) feet.
2. That Applicant proposes to build a six (6) foot high
board-on-board fence along the southerly lot lines of the subject
property, which fence would therefore be two (2) feet higher than the
zoning code permits.
3. That Applicant does not intend to retain ownership of the
property and that the upkeep and maintenance of the proposed fence will be
that of the ultimate purchaser.
4. That Applicant's reason for requesting the variance is to
provide a buffer for the lots to noise and headlights from the adjacent
highway.
g
t.
5. That other means can be used to shield the lots from the
objected to highway activity, such as berms, shrubs, and bushes.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That the variance requested constitutes a substantial
deviation from the requirements of the zoning code.
2. That the property can be put to a reasonable use, and the
Applicant's objectives can be obtained through the use of alternate means
which do not require the grant of a variance.
3. That Applicant has not met the criteria for the grant of a
variance under Section 1201.05 of the Shorewood City Code and has not
estalished an undue hardship as defined by Minn. Stat. Section 462.357,
Subd. 6 ( 2 ) .
4. That Applicant's request for the above-described variance is
hereby denied.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 23d day of
January, 1989.
Jan Haugen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra L. Kennelly, City Clerk
Roll Call Vote:
Ayes -
Nays -
.... .
.
.
TO/J K. A- 8lfY
harbor for rodents, flies and insects; or
2. The winter accumulation of manure is not removed from the premises
prior to April 15 of each year; or
3. Accumulations of manure are not removed at such periods as will
insure that no objectionable aroma exists and that the requirements
of Subdivision 1 above are complied with; or
4. The applicant has failed to make a reasonable effort to keep the
animal or animals under control and fenced within its pasture; or
5. The applicant has not met the standards set forth in 1740.03 of this
ordinance; or
6. The animal has been cruelly or inhumanly treated.
f740.05 Penalty
Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
SECTION 741
LICENSING AND REGULATING THE KEEPING OF DOGS
f741.01
Definitions.
subd. 1
Owner: Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation owning,
harboring, or keeping a dog or dogs.
subd. 2
Kennel: Any person, partnership or corporation engaged in the
\
business of breeding, buying, selling or boarding dogs; provided that such
person, partnership or corporation customarily owns or boards more than three
(3) dogs over six (6) months of age.
29
9
~ . <
.
.
subd. 3 Animal Shelter: Any premises designated by the City Council for the
purpose of impounding and caring for dogs held under the authority of this
ordinance.
,
subd. 4 Officer: Any law enforcement officer of the City and persons
designated by the City to assist in the enforcement of this ordinance.
subd. 5 Running at Large: Running at large shall mean permitting any dog to
go on or about the public streets, alleys, or other public or private places
in the City except the premises of the owner or harborer thereof.
741.02
License Required
subd. 1 License Required. No person shall own, keep, harbor or have custody
of any dog over six (6) months of age without first obtaining a license
therefor from the City Clerk of his agent. Applications for license shall be
made on forms prescribed by the City Clerk, which form shall set forth: (1)
the name and address of the owner, (2) the name and address of the person
making application, if other than the owner, and (3) the breed, sex, an age of
the dog for which a license is sought. No license shall be issued to any
person other than the owner except upon the written request of the owner.
subd. 2 Two dog per household limit. No household or person shall own,
keep, harbor, or have in custody more than two dogs except by special permit
granted by the City Council. All puppies shall be sold or otherwise disposed
of ~ithin ninety (90) days after birth so as to reduce the number of dogs in
any household to a maximum of two.
30
~
.
.
.
S741.03 Requirements of License
License shall be valid for a period of one (1) year commencing January 1 and
expiring December 31 of the year issued; and shall be issued only upon payment
of an annual fees to the City Clerk. The sum payable for each such license
shall be assessed on a per animal basis in an amount established by the
council from time to time as specifically set out in the fee schedule,
S402.01; of this code.
subd. 1 Proof of Vaccination. Every application for a license shall be
accompanied by a certificate from a qualified veterinarian showing that the
dog to be licensed has been given a vaccination against rabies within the time
hereinafter specified. No license shall be granted for a dog which has not
been vaccinated against rabies as provided in this section on such a date that
not more than two years will have elapsed from the date of such vaccination to
the time of the expiration of the license to be issued. Vaccination shall be
performed only by a doctor qualified to practice veterinary medicine in the
state in which the dog is vaccinated.
S741.04 Leashing.
No person having custody or control of any dog shall permit the same to be on
any unfenced area or lot abutting upon a street, public parkt public place, or
upon any other private land except the premises of the owner or harborer
thereof, without being effectively restrained by a leash or chain or dog is
within ten (10) feet of the person having custody of it and is obedient to the
command of that person; nor shall any dog be permitted to run at large within
the corporate limits of the citYt nor shall any person having the custody or
control of any dog permit the same at any time to be on any street, public
31
.
.
park, school grounds, or public place without being effectively restrained by
a chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length.
S741.05 Obligation to Prevent Nuisances
It shall be the obligation and responsibility of the owner or custodian of any
animal in the City, whether permanently or temporarily therein, to prevent
such animal from committing any act which constitutes a nuisance. It shall be
considered a nuisance for any animal to habitually or frequently bark or cry,
to frequent school grounds, parks, or public beaches, to chase vehicles, to
molest, annoy or bite any person if such person is not on the property of the
owner or custodian of such animal, or to molest, defile or destroy any
property, public or private. Failure on the part of the owner or custodian to
prevent his animals from committing an act of nuisance shall subject the owner
or custodian to the penalty hereinafter provided.
S741.06 Impoundment
Unrestrained dogs may be taken by any officer as hereinbefore defined and
impounded in an animal shelter and there confined in a humane manner.
Impounded dogs shall be kept for not less than five regular business days
unless reclaimed prior to that time by their owner as provided hereafter.
S741.07 Notice of Impoundment
Within twenty-four (24) hours after taking a dog into custody, the animal
supervisor shall, if the animal has an official tag, leave at the address
shown on the certificate and registration a notice that the animal is in his
custody and will not be disposed of if redeemed within the stated time, which
time shall be not less than five (5) full days after such animal was taken
32
~
.
.
into custody. The date of the killing or selling of the dog shall be the
sixth day after giving notice.
~741.08 Redemption
Any dog may be reclaimed from the animal shelter by its owner within the time
specified in the notice by payment to the Clerk of the license fee, if not
paid for the current year, with an impounding fee and a per diem boarding fee
as set by the City Council from time to time. In establishing the impounding
fee, the Council may establish a schedule of fees based on the number of times
a dog has been impounded. Notwithstanding this section, the owner shall
remain subject to all other penalties contained in this ordinance.
~741.09 Disposition of Unclaimed Dogs
Any dog which is not claimed as provided in ~741.08, within five regular
business days after impounding, may be sold for not less than the amounts
provided in ~741.08 to anyone desiring to purchase to dog if not requested by
a licensed educational or scientific institution under Minnesota law. All
sums received in excess of the costs and tax shall be held by the Clerk for
the benefit of the owner and if not claimed in one year, such funds shall be
placed in the general fund of the City. Any dog which is not claimed by the
owner or sold shall be painlessly killed and buried by the Poundmaster.
~741.10 Permissible Return of Unrestrained Dog
Notwithstanding the provisions of ~741.06, if an animal is found unrestrained
and its owner can be identified and located, such animal need not be impounded
but may, instead, be taken to the owner. In such case, however, proceedings
may be taken against the owner for violation of this Ordinance.
33
.,.
5741.11
Confinement of Certain Dogs
Every female animal in heat shall be confined in a building or other secure
enclosure, in such manner that such female animal cannot come into contact
with another animal, except for planned breeding.
5741.12
Owner Obligation for Proper Care
No owner shall fail to provide any animal with sufficient good and wholesome
~
food and water, proper shelter and protection from the weather, veterinary
care when needed to prevent suffering, and with humane care and treatment. No
person shall beat, treat cruelly, torment or otherwise abuse any animal, or
cause or permit any dog fight. No owner of a dog shall abandon such animal.
5741.13
Quarantine of Certain Dogs
Any dog which bites a person shall be quarantined for such time as may be
directed by the City Health Officer. During quarantine the animal shall be
securely confined and kept from contact with any other animal. At the
discretion of the Health Officer, the quarantine may be on the premises of the
owner; however, if the Health Officer requires other confinement, the owner
shall surrender the animal for the quarantine period to an animal shelter or
shall, at his own expense, place it in a veterinary hospital.
5741.14
Muzzling Proclamation
Whenever the prevalence o( rabies renders such action necessary to protect the
public health and safety, the Council shall issue a proclamation ordering
every person owning or keeping a dog to muzzle it securely so that it cannot
bite. No person shall violate such proclamation and any unmuzzled dog
unrestrained during the time fixed in the proclamation shall be subject to
34
.
~
.
.
The sections of this Ordinance requiring a license shall not apply to
non-residents of the City, provided that dogs of such owners shall not be kept
in the City longer than thirty (30) days without a license and shall be kept
under restraint.
~741.20 Penalt~
Any person,firm, or corporation found guilty of violating any provision of
this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
SECTION 742
REGULATION OF THE USE OF ANIMAL TRAPS
~742.01 Purpose
It is the purpose of this Ordinance to preclude the potential harm that may be
inflicted upon people, particularly children, and to prevent the maiming,
unselective catching, and destruction of wild animals and birds and domestic
animals that come in contact with traps.
~741.02 Definitions
As used in this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the following
meanings:
subd. 1
Trap: Any mechanical device or snare which seeks to hold, capture,
or kill an animal.
subd. 2
Trapping: The setting or laying, or other use of a trap anywhere
37
~ /I .
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
U. 5f 'J:>
o?1-
.,1-5
4-
jj .It r L
~r<..
IV\. j,{ A)":;::-C-;: jJ;If,L r-c;z:.r "
-'
:f 1Ie;;e ~ l/ ..;:: [C:.J - t.l /-t- ')r'...ll\-rs cf C75
DEFINITIONS.
The follo~ing terms shall mean:
1) Owner - Any person, group of persons or corporation owning, Keeping,
harboring or having charge or control of or permitting any animal to habitually
be or remain on or be lodged or fed within such person's house, yard or
premises for a period of three \3) days or longer. This term shall not apply
to veterinarians or Kennel operators temporarily maintaining on their premises
dogs owned by others.
2) Stray - Any unlicensed dog or cat, the owner of which is unKown, ~hich
is at large within the City.
3) Animal - shall mean any individual member of any of the
birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles, insects, arachnids, curstaceans
except homo sapiens.
species of
or mammal s ,
4) At Large - Any animal which is not effectively restrained within a
fenced area, or any animal which is permitted to be on any unfenced area or
lot abutting upon a str~et, alley, public place or upon any other private land
without being effectively restrained from moving beyond such unfenced area or
lot, or any animal which is permitted to be on any street, public parK, school
grounds or public place without being effectively restrained by chain or leash
not exceeding six (6) feet in ~ength, shall be deemed to be running at large.
5) Restrained - An an imal is cons idered restrained if it is enclosed
within a fenced area, picKeted to a stationary object by means of a chain, or
metallic cable, under voice or signal command of a competent person, ~rovided
sa id an i mal will immed iate 1 y obey that person's vo ice or signal command, if it
is within a vehicle being driven or parKed on the public streets.
6) Animal warden Any person, firm, agency or company hired or
appointed by the City to assist and/or enforce this ordinance.
7) Animal Shelter ~ Any premises designated by the City Council for
impounding and caring for all animals found running at large.
S) Kennel - Any premises where three
species, over six (6) months of age are
for sale.
(3)
Kept,
or more
boarded,
animals of the same
bred and/or offered
S) AttacK - "AttacK" shall mean any act of bit ing, scratch ing, or caus ing-
any other injury to a human by an animal.
10) Biting Animal - Shall refer to any animal who has bitten, scratched or
caused any other injury to a human being under circumstances where, at the time
of the attacK, the victim was law-fully conducting himself upon the premises on
which the victim was legally entitled to be, including premises owned or
controlled by the owner of the animal, if such location is commonly open to the
public, such as a driveway, sidewalK or boulevard, or the victim was on such
premises c<t the express or imp] ied inv itat ion of the owner of the an imal.
:, t -I
.
.
11) Vicious/Dangerous
been deemed a Biting animal
to commit another attacK on
An ima] Shall r-efer to any
and has committed another attacK,
a person, persons or animal.
an i ma I
or has
wh ich ha$-
attempted
LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall own, Keep, or harbor any dog or cat
over six (6) months of age within the City without a license. A license is
required if the dog or cat iso~ned, harbored, Kept or maintained for three (3)
consecutive days or more, except that no license shall be requjred for dogs or
cats whose o~ners are temporarily ~ithin the City for a period of less than
thirty (30) days, or to guide dogs accompanying and properly trained to assis~
blind or deaf pe....sons L1hen such dogs are prope....ly harnessed or leashed so that
the blind or deaf person may maintain control of the dog or cat.
A)
Licensing Procedures.
Application. Written application for a license
City ClerK and shall state the name and address
name, breed, color, age and sex of the dog or
must be accompanied by a certificate from
veterinarian certifYing that the dog or cat has
rabies for a term not less than the term OT the
shall be paid at the time of maKing application
shall be given to the applicant.
shall be made to the
of the owner and the
cat. The application
a qualified licensed
been vaccinated against
license. The license fee
and a numbered receipt
B) License fee. The City Council, from time to time, shall
resolution, the Tee for issuance of a biennial license
annual license for cats. Licenses shall expire on the
establish
for dogs,
day 0 f
by
an
C) Tag and Collar. Upon complying uith the provisions above, the City
ClerK shall issue a numbered metallic tag, stamped ~ith the number and
year issued and labeled "Licensed City of "Owners are
required to see that the tag is securely fastened to the dog or cat's
chain, collar or harness of durable material which must be worn by the
dog or cat at all times. The fact that a dog or cat is without a
license attatched to its collar shall be presumputive evidence that
the dog or cat is unlicensed. In the event that the metallic license
tag issued for a dog or cat becomes lost, the owner may obtain a
duplicate tag from the City ClerK upon the payment of $
0)
False Representation. No person
license for any other dog or
counterfeit license tags.
shall
cat,
use for any
or counterfeit,
dog
or
or cat,
attempt
a
to
E) No more than three
residential unit.
(3) dog or cat
licenses shall
be
issued per
j.. r.,
.
.
CONFINEMENT OF CERTAIN DOGS AND CATS
OogS Or Cats In Heat. Every female dog
within a building or secure enclosure, or confined in
female dog or cat cannot come in contact with another
breeding purposes.
or cat shall
such a manner
dog or. cat
be confined
that such
except for
Biting Or Vicious Animals. All biting or vicious animals must
be confined within a building, or within an enclosure consisting of sufficient
material so as to prevent said animal from going through or over said
enclosure. The top shall be covered and secured, and the flooring shall be of
concrete or have fencing placed at least three (3) feet into the ground so as
to prevent said animal from digging out. All openings to such enclosure shal~
be locKed at all times and signs posted alerting others that this animal has
been deemed vicious or dangerous according to of this chapter.
Said animal shall not be allowed out of enclosure unless it is muzzled and
on a leash not exceeding four (4) feet in length and controlled by a competent
person with the ability to control said animal.
RUNNING AT LARGE/CITATION. When an animal is found running at large,
a ownerShip is Known to the agents of the City Council, such animals
need not be impo the agent may, at his discretion, cite the owners of
such animals to appear in court 0 to charges of violation of this
ordinance. Animals found running at large on mor occassion shall be
impounded and the owner notified of such impoundment.
r,.....~ -- i ..... S-4'r -l ";.G'''- ..".+' ,A, A C ~,~ ~ ,~'s .:ti: 5(po .0 <I 'x \l .~''''.::-v '" AT J- t+/Zt;L
NUISANCE ANIMALS PROHIBITED. Nuisance animals listed in this section,
shall not be permitted within the City limits, if upon decision of the Council,
its agents or a peace officer, the owner's have not attempted, or have failed
to redeem said animal from contin~ing to be a nuicense as herein defin~d. It
shall also be the right of the Council, its agents, or any peace officer, to
require impoundment of said animal to stop such annoyance. The owner shall be
notified of such impoundment and responsible for all fees and charges.
A) BarKing Oogs/Meowing or Yeowlin9 Cats. Any dog or cat which barKs, bays,
meows, yeowls, cries or howls for a period of ten min~tes or more, or that
carries on intermi~tently for one half hour or more, and in so doing disturbs
or annoys another person, shall be declared a nuisance.
B) Any dog or cat that chases vehicles or interferes with persons walKing,
or in~erferes with pedestrians, persons horsebacK riding, or the driving of
automobiles, bicycles, motorcycles, motorbiKes, snowmobiles, or other vehicles
on public gro~nds, streets or highways.
C) Any dog or cat that commits damage to the person or property of
other than the owner, or habitually strays to the property of another,
be declared a nuisance.
anyone
shall
INTERFERENCE. No person st-oa.l1 interfere with,
Warden in the performance of his duty, or seeK
thE custod~" of "the An ima1 l~rder., except as her e in
hinder or molest
to release any
pt"OV ided.
the Animal
.an imal in
- .>...
.
.
IMPOUNDING ANIMALS.
1) The Animal Warden, as defined herein, may taKe
animal found not to be Kept, confined or restrained
ordinance, or found to be a biting or vicious animal.
up
as
and impound
required by
any
this
2) Immediately upon the impounding of a dog wearing a current
animal warden must maKe every reasonable effort to notify the
dog of the impoundment and of conditions whereby the owner may
of the dog. Any verbal notices must i~diately be confirmed
the animal warden.
1 icense , the
owner of such
regain custody
in wr it ing by
3) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, if an
injured animal is impounded pursuant to this part of this chapter, it may be
destroyed at any time, upon reco~ndation of a veterinarian, but only after
reasonable efforts have been made to contact its owner.
4) Any animal found in violation of this ordinance shall be taKen and
confined in a humane manner for a period of not less than five (5) business
days, and, if not claimed prior thereto by its owner, such animal shall
thereafter become the property of the animal warden and may be disposed of in
a humane manner, sold to an individual desiring to purchase the animal as a pet
or sold for licensed scientific use.
ANIMALS WHICH CANNOT BE IMPOUNDED. If an animal is Known to be
vicious, dangerous, rabid or suspected of having been exposed to rabies, and
such animal cannot be impounded after all reasonable effort or cannot be
impounded without serious risK to the persons attempting to impound it, such
animal may be immediately Killed, and the owner liable for all charges arising
therefrom.
REDEMPTION OF H-POUNOED ANIMAL.
1 ) Any an imal impounded pursuant to this ordinance, may be reclaimed by
the owner within five (5) business days upon payment to the City or its agent
of the impounding fee, together with a boarding fee for Keeping of such animal
during impoundment, provided that the licensing requirements are complied
with.
2) If an animal has
pay the veterinary bill
the extra care required
required veterinary care, the owner shall be
in its entirety, plus any additional charges
for his/her animal.
liable to
to cover
3) When an animal is impounded more than once within any twelve
period, the owner shall pay an additional sum of $10 on the second
and a sum of $25 on the third and each consecutive impoundment
(12) month
impoundment,
ther.eafter.
4) Unl icensed animals shall be released after all charges are paid. A
license must be obtained within seven (7) days of the anir~l's release. If a
I icense is not obtained within the set amount of time, the owner shall be in
u~olation of this ordi~ance.
~
..
.
.
BITING ANIMALS TO BE QUARANTINED. Whenever any
bitten a person, a Known or suspected rabid animal is picKed up by
warden, such animal shall be Kept in confined in such a manner as
such animal from coming into contact with other animals or persons
the owner.
an imal has
the animal
to prevent
other than
A) Upon proof from the owner of a current rabies vaccination, the owner
may quarantine the animal at his/her place of residence, following the rules
that such animal shall not be permitted to come in contact with other animals
or persons, that the animal be muzzled and on a leash not to exceed six (6)
feet when taKen from the place of confinement, and controlled by a competent
person.
B) If no proof of a current rabies vaccination, or upon descision
owner or City Council, said animal will be quarantined at the Animal
or a licensed veterinary clinic for the term of the quarantine, at the
of the owner.
of the
Shelter
expense
C) Said animal MAY NOT be removed from
written permission from the City Councilor
the place
its agents.
of
quarantine
without
BITING, VICIOUS, DANGEROUS ANIMAL.
SITING ANIMAL. Whenever it shall appear to the satisfaction of the
Council, its officers or agents, that any animal meets the criteria found in
the definition of "Siting Animal", it shall be deemed as such. Once an animal
has been declared biting, the following criieria musi be met:
1) If the an imal was impounded, and photographs or other
characteristics obtained, such materials shall be placed in
file, indexed under ihe owner's name.
identifying
a permenant
2) If the animal was noi impounded, the owner must, within five (5) days of
notification by certified mail or personal delivery, submit suitable
photographs or other materials to identify the animal, or maKe the animal
available for the taKing of photographs by such person as declared by the
Council.
3) The owner must, within twenty-four (24) hours, notify the Councilor its
agents if sa id an imal is so I d, given away, dies or is euthan i%ed, and
must provide proof of disposition.
4) Said animal shall continue to be confined in an enclosure of suitable
material which shall not permit the animal to get through, have a secure
cover so as to prevent said animal from climbing over, and flooring of
concrete or fencing buried at least three (3) feet into the ground so as
1:0 pr~lJent $-a id an imal fr-om d 199 ing out. All open ings shall be locKed Cot
all times ar,d the anim<>.l shc.ll not be removed from said er.closur-e unless
on a_ leash 1-, cd. exceeding (6) feet and held b>-' a cOffiPet€:n-t pet'~-on.
,
.
.
VICIOUS/DANGEROUS ANIMAL.
criteria shall be deemed vicious:
Any
an imal
which meets the
fOllowing
A) Any animal which has previously been deemed as a biting animal
committed or attempted to commit another a~tacK.
and has
B) Any animal which has caused serious bodily
any person, or
injury or disfigurement to
C) engaged in any at~acK on any person under circumstances which would.
indicate danger to personal safety, or
OJ exhibited unusually aggressive behavior, such as an attaCK on another
an imal, or
E) the owner fails to restrain an animal from inflicting or attemp~ing to
inflict bodily injury to any person or other animal whether or not the
owner is presen~, or
F) the owner has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to control the
animal in order to prevent injury to persons or other animals.
Once an animal has been declared vicious, the following conditions shall be
complied with:
1) The owner shall be notified by certified mail
that said animal has been deemed vicious, and
or personal
de livery,
2) within forty-eight (48) of receipt of such notice,
destroyed or removed from the limits of the City.
to have the animal destroyed he must,
said animal shall be
If the owner elects
3) present a receipt from the animal warden, a licensed veterinarian, or
humane society, declaring that said animal has been destroyed. Or if
owner elects ~o remove the animal from the City, he/she shall;
4) provide written proof of the name, a.ddress .nd telephone
person or persons taKing charge of said animal, signed by
local authorities, or a council member, stating that they
the location of said animal and that they agree to taKe
to maKe sure that,
number of the
the appointed
are aware of
respons ib 11 ity
5) such person or persons taKing charge of said .nimal shall
local regulations regarding dangerous/vicious .nimals.
comply with
Violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a
to exceed $700 or imprisonment not to exceed ninty (90) days,
fine not
or both.
~
.J
or
.
.
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS
Upon sworn complaint to the District Court that anyone of the following
facts exists:
1)
Than any animal at any time has destroyed property or
trespasses ina damaging manner on the property of persons
the owner:
habitually
other than
2) That any animal at any time has .ttacKed or bitten a person outside
the owner's or custodian's premises:
3)
That any animal is vicious
pedestrians or interferes with
or shows
vehicles
vicious habits
on the publiC
or mo I ests'
streets: or
4)
That any
an imal
is a public nuisance
as
heretofore
defined:
the judge shall issue a summons directed to the' owner of the an imal ,
commanding him/her to appear before the court to show cause why the animal
should not be seized by any peace officer, or otherwise disposed of in the
manner authorized in this part. Such summons shall be returnable not less
than two (2) nor more than six (6) days from the date thereof and shall be
served at least two (2) days before the time of the scheduled appearance.
Upon such hearing and finding the facts true as complained of, the court may
either order the animal Killed or order the owner or custodian to remove it
from the City, or may order the owner or custodian to Keep it confined to a
designated place. If the owner or custodian violates such order, any pOlice
officer may impound the animal described in such order. The provisions of
this section are in addition to and supplemental to other provisions of this
ordinance.
The cost of the proceedings specified by
against the owner or custodian of the animal,
are found to be true, or to the complaintant,
untrue.
this section
if the facts
if the facts
shall be assessed
in the comp 1 a int
are found. to be
MJZZLIr-G PROCLAM=\TION. Whenever the prevelance of rabies renders
such action necessary to protect the public health and safety, the Council
shall issue a proclamation ordering every person owning, Keeping or harboring
a dog or cat to muzzel it securely so that it cannot bite. No person shall
violate such proclamation and any unmuzzled dog or cat unrestrained during the
time fixed in the proclamation shall be subject to impoundment as heretofore
provided, and the owner of such animal shall be subject to the penalty
hereinafter provided.
KENNELS/CATTERIES
License Requ ired. Any person, firm, corporat ion, or
the City owning or having under their control, or boarding
property, or for the purposes o~ breeding, sp~rt or sales,
dogs or cats, shall apply to the City ClerK for
family unit within
or Keeping on their
more than three (3)
a Kennel license.
No license shall be issued unless each
property proposed to be licensed, or unless
propert>-' sr.;:, II of irst be dul~' 1 icens.ed
dog or
each dog
pursuant
cat then present
or cat to be Kept
to sect iol'".
on the
at -: uch
her", in.
.,
.
.
.-...
". .. -.-
LICENSE FEES; RULES; EXPIRATION.
A) The annual fee for such license shall be $
containing upto ~en (10) cats or dogs. The annual fee
more than ten (10) shall be an additional $ for
dog.
,
for each Kennel
Kennels con~aining
add it ional cat or
Tor
each
B) No license shall be issued for a Kennel for the first time, until ~he
application is approved by the Council.
C) The rules contained in Minnesota Statu~es, Section 347.35, are hereby
adopted by reference and made a part hereof as iT Tully set Torth herein. In
addition, the Council may maKe such rules as deemed appropriate for the
qualification of any premises to be licensed as a dog or cat Kennel. No
license shall be issued until the proposed facility has been inspected and
meets the standards of this section.
D) Every Kennel license shall expire on the last day
fOllowing its issuance, and may be renewed after the initial
further approval OT the Council.
of December next
issuance without
KENNEL INSPECTION. Any dog or cat Kennel within the City may be inspected
Trom time to ~ime by any duly authorized agent of the City as appointed by the
Council, or by any peace oTficer.
REVOCATION.
A) The Council may revoKe or suspend the license of any person, firm,
corporation or family unit for violation of the rules issued pursuant to or
established in herein, upon the written complaint made to the Council by
any person, firm, or corporation alleging any viol~tion of this ordinance, or
any rule issued pursuant hereto.
B) Upon receipt
investigation to be
of a
made
written
upon
complaint, the Council
matters related in
shall
said
Cause an
complaint.
C) The rules regarding suspension and revocation contained
of this ordinance shall apply to this section.
in Sect ion
ABANDONMENT. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation
to willing leave an impounded animal in the shelter after being notified of such
impoundment. Violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor.
t! L f/4/1/:;;-,t1 G 0 1-
::t-ECf5
3f~
t{} t! .J-r .fl., P A.o-v I :::It" 3"7 - L3
VIOLATIONS.
1) Nothing in this ordinance, nor the initiation of any procedures herein
enumerated, shall be deemed to limit, alter or impair the right of the City to
seeK enforcement through criminal prosecution of any violation of this
ordinance.
2) A violation OT any prOvisions of this part shall
to misdemeanor charges.
subject the
violator
c
(
"-
"-.,
~,~~
~
.
.
.. ..
On motion of Ald. Kelly
Seconded by Ald. Kennedy
(
ORDINANCE NO. 87-13
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBDIVISION 1 OF SECTION 905.03
OF THE WEST ST. PAUL CITY CODE OF 1980 REGULATING
THE RUNNING AT LARGE AND CLEAN UP OF LITTER.OF
DOGS AND CATS .
.
""'
THE CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. That Subdivision 1 of Section 905.03 of the West St. Paul
City Code of 1980 is hereby amended to provide as follows:
BYnnins_S~_b~~~~sng_~1~~nl0g_YQ_Qf_L'__~C' The license
holder, ner or keeper of any dog or cat s I be responsible for
the effect i "estraint of sai d dog or and shall not permi t the ""
dog or cat to ru t large. ~ny d or cat which is not effectively~
containe~ within a fe are or any dog or cat which is on any
unfenced area or lot abut a street, alley, public park, public
place or upon any oth private without being effectively
restrained by chaO or leash from movi eyond such unfenced area or
lot, or any do or cat on any street, public school grounds or
public pIa without being effectively restrained by . or leash
not ex ding six feet in length, shall be deemed to be 'runn~ j:...
lar
~tg~nlng_~Q_2f_b!~~g~. The owner of any dog or cat or any person
having the custody or control of any dog or cat shall be responsible
for cleaning up any feces of the animal and dispOSing of such feces
in a sanitary manner. It is unlawful for any perso~ owning, keeping
or harboring a dog or cat to cause or permit said dog or cat to be on
property, public or private, not owned or possessed by such person
without having in his/her immediate possession a device' for the
removal of feces and depository for the transmission of excrement to
a proper receptacle located on the property owned or possessed by
such person. It is unlawful for any person in control of, causing'or
permitting any dog or cat to be on any property, public or private,
not owned or possessed by such person, to fail to remove feces 'left
by such dog or cat to a proper receptacle located on property owned
or possessed by such person. The provisions of this paragraph shall
not apply to the ownership or use of seeing eye dogs by blind
persons, dogs when used in police activities by the City, or tracking
dogs when used by or with the permission of the City.
',-
'f;
to"
. .'-i;
,. f
l'
,~!
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take ef'fect immediately after
passage, approval and publication.
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
APPROVED: August 10, 1987
Attest~~~~~~
: ~~e R. Latuff
City Clerk. . ..,
!~L_~~on~~t!_tt~_~Y!2~
Mayor
"
~ , .
.
.
t:.0 p\ ( (\ N !: 1\
so registered, licensed and numbered, together with a description of such dog or
cat, in a book kept by him for that purpose, and to issue to such owner or
keeper a written license for each dog or cat so registered, licensed, and
numbered together with a tag, bearing the regi stration number of such dog or cat.
Every person having a dog or cat registered as provided herein shall cause
to be placed and kept around the neck of such dog or cat a collar to which the
license tag provided for herein shall be securely fastened. It shall be unlawful
for any person to remove the collar or tag from any dog or cat licensed, registered, or
numbered as herein provided, or to wrongfully kill, maim, entice, or carry
away any such dog or cat.
Q)
560.04 Running at Large.
It shall be unlawful for any owner or keeper of a dog or cat to
allow such dog or cat to run at large within the corporate limits, of
the City of Waconia, whether or not such dog or cat is licensed,
registered, or numbered. For the purposes of this Chapter, a dog
or cat shall be considered to be at large when said dog or cat is not
under restraint as defined by this Section. The term restraint as used
in this Section shall mean any of the following conditions:
a. The controlling of a dog or cat by means of a leash, cord, or
chain being affixed to the dog's or cat's collar, with the
other end held securely by the person exercising restraint,
provided that such leash, cord, or chain shall not exceed six
(6) feet in length, and shall be made of such material as to
prevent the dog's or eat's escape by either breaking or chewing
through said leash, cord or chain.
b. The controlling of a dog or cat by means of a fixed leash, cord
or chain, one end being securely fastened to the dog's or eat's
collar, and the other end being securely fastened to some
fixed object, of such strength as to prevent the escape of the
dog or cat by either pulling or chewing through the fixed object.
It is further required by this Subdivision that such leash, cord,
or chain shall be of sufficient length to allow the dog or cat
freedom to move about, but shall not be so long as to allow the
dog or cat to move off the property owned, leased, or rented by
the owner of the dog or cat.
c. The controlling of a dog or cat by means of a fixed pen, of
sufficient size to allow the dog or cat freedom to move about,
but of sufficient strength and size to prevent the escape of the
dog or cat by climbing, digging, chewing, manipulation of locks
or gates, or any other means.
d~ The controlling of a dog or cat by means of either voice or hand
command provided, however, that'restraint as defined in this
Subdivision shall be active restraint, and shall be deemed to be
in effect only while the owner is actively engaged in controlling
the dog or cat. For the purposes of this Subdivision, allowing a
dog or cat to be off leash or out of pen on the property of the
owner, while said owner is not then present, dOes not constitute
restraint.
.. .. ..
.
f ./.
,-xc It So or
.
Ef4l. C -J. : ,,/ e.
J""^-'7
..Da..i~
01.6 ,qfc;
,
ORDINANCE NO. 193
AMENDING ENTIRE SECTION 430 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
Section 430 - Dogs; License and Regulations
SECTION 430:00. DEFINITIONS.
Subd. 1. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the words,
combination of words, terms, and phrases, as used in Section 430:00 et. seq.
shall have the meanings set forth in the subdivisions which follow.
Subd. 2. Owner. As used in this ordinance, "owner" means any person, firm,
or corporation owning, harboring or keeping a dog, or the parents or guardians
of any such person under 21 years of age.
Subd. 3. At Large. "At Large" means off the premises of the person who
owns, harbors or keeps the dog, and not under the control of such person, or
some other person designated by him/her, either by leash, or otherwise.
Subd. 4. Vicious Dog. "Vicious dog" means any dog or dogs that constitute a
physical threat to human beings or other animals by virture of one or more
attacks of such severity as to cause property damage or physical injury.
Section 430:05. Violations.
Subd. 1. Dogs Running at Large. No owner of a dog shall allow such dog to
run at large within the corporate limits of the municipality. All dogs not
confined within an enclosure shall be kept on a leash securely fashioned, or
held so as to prevent the dog from running at large.
Subd. 2. Barking Dogs. No owner shall allow in his possession or on his
premises any dog which by loud and frequent barking, howling, or yelping
shall cause noise, disturbance, or annoyance to persons residing in the
vicinity thereof.
Subd. 3. Dogs which are a Public Nuisance. A dog is declared to be a public
nuisance and it shall be unlawful to be an owner of such a dog if the dog:
a. Runs at large, strays or trespasses; or
b. Causes disturbance, annoyance or noise in violation of
any provision of Sections 430:00 - 430:25; or
c. Damages the property of anyone other than its owner; or
d. By virture of number or type is offensive or dangerous to
the public health, safety or welfare; or
e. Attack other domestic animals; or
f. Is a vicious dog; or
g. Causes unsanitary conditions of enclosures or
surroundings; or
~ . .,.
.
.
h. Molests passersby or passing vehicles; or
i. Causes fouling of the air by odors.
Subd. 4. License Required. No dog owner shall keep any dog over three
months of age except a recognized guide or seeing-eye dog kept for a blind
person within the corporate limits of this municipality unless a license
therefore has been first secured.
Subd. 5. Interference with Officers. It is unlawful for any unauthorized
person to break open the pound or to attempt to do so, or to take or let any
dog taken by him in compliance with this ordinance or in any manner to
interfere with or hinder such officer in the discharge of his duties under
this ordinance.
Subd. 6. Offenses Involving Tags. It is unlawful to counterfeit or to
attempt to counterfeit the tags provided for in Section 430:10 of this
ordinance to take from any dog a tag legally placed upon it by its owner with
the intent to place it upon another dog or to place such tag upon another dog.
Subd. 7. Tags not Transferable. Dog tags are not transferable and no
refunds shall be made on any dog license fee because of leaving the
muni ci pa 1 i ty or death of the dog before the expi ra ti on of the li cense.
Subd. 8. Vaccination. No license shall be granted for a dog which has not
been vaccinated aginst rabies as provided in this Section within a period of
two years preceding the application for a license. Vaccination shall be
performed only by a doctor qualified to practice veterinary medicine in the
state in which the dog is vaccinated. A veterinarian who vaccinates a dog to
be licensed in this municipality shall complete in triplicate a Certification
of Vaccination. One copy shall be issued to the dog owner for affixing to the
license application, one shall be sent to the Minnesota State Livestock
Sanitary Board, and one copy shall be retained in the veterinarian's files.
Subd. 9. Removal of Excrement. It is unlawful for any owner of a dog:
1. To permi t that dog to be on any property, pub 1 i c or private,
not owned or possessed by such owner, unless such owner has in
his/her immediate possession a device for the removal of excre-
ment and depository for the transmission of excrement to a proper
receptacle located upon property owned or possessed by owner of
said dog; or
2. To fail to remove excrement left by such dog to a proper recep-
tacle located on property owned or possessed by owner of said dog.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to the ownership or use of
seeing-eye dogs by blind persons, dogs when used in police activities by the
City, or tracking dogs when used by or with the permission of the City.
Subd. 10. Violation of this Section. Violation of any subdivision of Section
430:05 is a petty offense governed by Ordinance No. 157, adopted by City
Council 11/19/84.
2
\. '" ,~
.
.
SECTION 430:10~ LICENSE ISSUANCE.
Subd. 1. Fee Required. Licenses shall be issued by the Clerk for each dog,
for a fee in the amount established by the Council from time to time.
.- -
Subd. 2. Application. Every application for a license shall be accompanied
by a certification from a qualified veterinarian showing that the dog to be
licensed has been given a vacctnation against rabies in compliance with
Section 430:05, Subd. 8.
Subd. 3. Expiration. Licenses shall expire on the 31th day of December next
following their lssuance.
Subd. 4. Payment of Fee. It shall be the duty of each owner of a dog to pay
the required license fee imposed to the Clerk on or before the first day of
January in each year, or upon acquiring ownership or possession of any
unlicensed dog or upon establishing residence in this municipality. The Clerk
shall cause a notice of the necessity of paying such license fee to be printed
in the official paper one time before the 1st day of December in each year.
A penalty in the amount duly established by the Council from time to time
shall be charged in addition to the normal fee for any license purchased after
April 1st of each year unless the person applying for the license furnished
proof they took up residence in the municipality after April 1st or purchased
the dog after April 1st.
Subd. 5. Receipts and Tags. Upon the payment of the license fee, the Clerk
shall execute a receip~ in duplicate. He/she shall deliver the original
receipt to the person who pays the fee, retaining the duplicate. He/she
shall also procure a sufficient number of suitable metallic tags, the shape of
which shall be different for each license year; and he/she shall deliver one
appropriate tag to the owner when the fee is paid.
Subd. 6. Affixing Tags. The owner shall cause said tag to be affixed by a
permanent metal fastening to the collar of the dog so licensed in such a
manner that the tag may be easily seen by the officers of the municipality.
The owner shall see that the tag is constantly worn by such dog.
SECTION 430:15. DOG POUND.
Subd. 1. Impounding. Thirty days after the taking effect of this ordinance
and on and after the first day of January of each year thereafter, the police
officers of this municipality, or duly appointed representatives shall take up
and impound any dogs found in the corporate limits, without the tag provided
in Section 430:10, running at large, harbored or kept contrary to any
provisions of this ordinance.
Subd. 2. Notice. Notice of impounding shall be given to the licensed owner,
if his name can ascertained from license records; otherwise by posting a
notice at the City Hall stating the cause for the impounding and that if the
dog is not claimed within five days, the dog shall be disposed of.
Subd. 3. Establishment of Pound. The Council shall by resolution from time
to time designate the name and address of the official municipal pound, and
establish fees for daily case.
3
". '"
.
.
Subd. 4. Redemption. Any dog shall be redeemed from the pound by the owner
within the time stated in the notice by the payment to the Clerk of the
._ license fe~ for the current year if required with an impounding fee together
with the charge of the pound for daily care; and emergency veterinary care
which the veterinarian in charge of the pound had determined to be necessary
to preserve the health or life of the animal. The fee for redemption shall be
set from time to time by resolution of the City Council.
Subd. 5. Release. Upon the presentation of a correct .license tag and a
receipt for a dog license for the current year and for the impounding and
daily care fees provided in this section, the poundmaster shall release to any
owner the dog claimed by him.
Subd. 6. Dispostiion'of Unclaimed Dogs. Any dog which is not claimed as
provided in this section w.ithin five days after impounding, maybe sold for
not less than $5.00 to anyone desiring to purchase the dog if not requested by
a licensed educational or scientific institution under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 35.71. Any dog which is not claimed by the owner or sold shall be
painlessly killed and buried by the poundmaster or upon the direction of the
Council may be delivered to the University of Minnesota for scientific
purposes.
Subd. 7. Duplicate Tags. In case any dog tag is lost, a duplicate may be
issued by the Clerk upon presentation of a receipt showing the payment of the
license fee for the current year. -A charge in the amount duly established by
the Council from time to time shall be made for each such duplicate tag.
SECTION 430:20. PROCEEDINGS FOR DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN DOGS.
Upon sworn complaint to a Judge of District Court of the municipality that any
one of the following facts exist:
1. That a dog at any time has destroyed property or habitually
trespassed in a damaging manner on property of persons other
than the owner;
2. That any dog at any time has attacked or bitten a person
outside the owner's or custodian's premises;
3. That any dog is vicious or show vicious habits, or molests
pedestrians or interferes with the driving of automobiles
on the public highways;
Said Judge shall issue a summons directed to the owner or person having
possession of said dog commanding him to appear before said Judge and to show
cause why said dog should not be seized and killed by the keeper of the dog
pound or any police officer or otherwise disposed of as authorized in this
Ordinance. Such summons shall be returneable not less than two nor more than
six days from the date thereof and shall be served at least two days before
the time of appearance mentioned therein. Upon such hearing and finding the
facts true as complained of, the Judge of District Court may either order the
dog killed or the owner or custodian to remove it from the City or may order
4
... ...... "..
.
.
the owner.or custodian to keep it confined to a designated place. If the
owner or custodian disobeys such order, he shall upon the filing of a
complaint and after a hearing and conviction be liable to the punishment
provided for violation this ordinance and any police officer or dog catcher
may upon disobedience of said order may impound and slay any dog described in
such order. The provisions of this section are in addition to and supple-
mental to other provisions of this ordinance. Costs of the proceedings
specified by this section shall be assessed against the owner or custodian of
the dog.
SECTION 430:25. RABIES CONTROL.
Subd. 1. Rabies; Board, Health Officers; Duties. As set forth in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 35.67, it shall be the duty of the executive officer of the
Board of Health of this municipality when complaint, in writing, shall have
been made to him that rabies exists in this municipality, to investigate,
either personally or through agency of subordinate officers under his
jurisdiction, as to the truth of any such complaint, and determine whether or
not rabies does exist in this municipality. Any such officer may, on his own
motion, and without such complaint, likewise make such an investigation and
determination. The fact that any executive officer of this municipality has
investigated and determined that jurisdiciton shall not deprive the executive
office of the Board of Animal Health of jurisdiction or authority to make such
an investigation and determination with reference to this municipality.
Subd. 2. Rabies; Proclamation; Publication. As set forth in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 35.6, if on such investigation any such officer finds and
determines that rabies does exist in this municipality, he shall forthwith and
there upon make and file, as hereinbefore provided, a proclamation, setting
forth the fact of such investigation and determination, and also in and by the
proclamation prohibit the owner or custodian of any dog from permitting or
allowing such dog to be at large within this municipality, designating it,
unless such dog shall be so effectively muzzled that it cannot bite any other
animal or any person.
When the secretary and executive officer of the Board of Animal Health after
investigation, has determined that rabies exists in any territory in the
State, he shall issue similar proclamation in all towns and cities within such
territory or area which in his judgement it is necessary to control the
outbreak and prevent the spread of such disease; and such proclamation, when
filed as hereinafter provided. shall prohibit the owner or custodian of any
dog within the desinated territory from permitting or allowing such dog to be
at large within such territory unless such dog shall be so effectively muzzled
that it cannot bite any other animal or person. It shall be the duty of all
peace officers and all health officers of this municipality to enforce the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 35.67 to 35.69 and any person
violating any of their provisions shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Such proclamation, when issued by the Health Officer, executive officer, or
Board of Health of this municipality shall be filed with the Clerk; when
issued by the State official hereinbefore named, it shall be filed with the
Clerk of this municipality.
5
'" ,... I,.
.
.
It shall be the duty of each officer with whom such proclamation is filed, as
aforesaid, to forthwith publish a copy thereof in one issue, at the expense of
this municipality, in a legal newspaper published in this municipality, if
such a newspaper is publisheq therein, a~q if there be no newspaper there,
then to post a copy of such proclamation in three public places therein.
Proof of publication shall be made by affidavit of the publisher, in the one
case, and of posting, in the other, by the person posting the same, which
affidavit shall be filed with the proclamation. The proclamation shall be
deemed effecti ve and in full force fi ve days after the pub 1 i cati on or posti ng
of copies thereof as hereinbefore provided for, and shall remain in full force
and effective for a period of time therein designated, not exceeding six
months, as shall be determined by the officer making the proclamation.
Subd. 3. Unmuzzled Dogs Not Permitted at Large. As set forth in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 35.69, it shall be unlawful for the owner or custodian of
any dog to suffer to permit it to be at large, either on the premises of the
owner or elsewhere, within this municipality after any such proclamation shall
have been made, during the time such proclamation is in force, unless such dog
shall be effectively muzzled so that it cannot bite any other animal or any
person.
It shall be lawful for any person to kill any dog running at large on the
public streets or roads in violation of the provisions of Sections 35.67 to
35.69, and the owner or owners of any dog so killed shall have no ~laim
against the person SQ killing any such dog.
It shall be the duty of all peace officers and all health officers of this
municipality to make complaint of any known violation of these sections.
Subd. 4. Passage. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from and after
passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of November, 1988.
Attest:
James R. Olds, Jr., Mayor
Jane Peterson, City Clerk
Gregory S. Withers, City Manager
,
6
<II
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancal
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Don Zdrazil !J;j- .
DATE:
January 20, 1989
SUBJECT:
Equipment Bid Recommendations
One-Ton Truck
Bids were received on January 20, 1989 for one new diesel powered one-ton
four wheel drive truck. The bid tabulation is attached. Lakeland Truck
Center did not bid and Tonka Ford did not submit a bid bond. Therefore,
staff recommends award to Boyer Ford Trucks in the amount of $16,389.
The 1989 budget amount is $20,000. Additional equipment will be needed
which should bring the total cost to approximately $20,000.
This award, if the Council agrees with the recommendation, should be done
by Resolution.
Street Sweeper
Bids were received on January 20, 1989 for one new single engine high lift
four wheel truck type street sweeper. The bid tabulation is attached. Alter-
native A gives the price with a reduction for the trade-in of the City's
existing sweeper. Alternative B is the price without a trade. Boyum Equip-
ment and MidCon Equipment met specifications exactly. MacQueen Equipment did
not meet specifications. Boyum submitted an alternative bid on a demonstrator
model with just 49 hours of operation and double gutter brooms. This bid is
$3,600.80 lower than a machine with no hours. Therefore, for this much less
in price, it is recommended to award the bid to Boyum Equipment, Inc. for
the Athey/Mobil AHL-2factory demonstrator street sweeper in the amount of
$80,955. The 1989 budget amount for this equipment is $85,000.
If the Council agrees with the recommendation, the award should be made by
Resolution.
I will be at the meeting on Monday, January 23, 1988, to answer your questions.
DZ/al
Attachment
cc: Glenn Froberg
Al Rolek
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
/()
'.
BID TABULATION
for
ONE (1) NEW SINGLE ENGINE HIGH LIFT FOUR WHEEL TRUCK TYPE SWEEPER
FOR THE
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Bids Opened:
Friday, January 20, 1989, 11.:00.A&M.
Vendor
Bid Security
Total Bid
1.
Boyum Equipment, Inc.
Cashiers Check
A-$84,555.80
B-$90,400.50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Boyum Equipment, Inc.
Cashiers Check
A-$80,955.00
B-$86,445.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.
MacQueen Equipment, Inc.
. St. Paul Fire & Marine
A-$62,8l0.00
B-$70,8l0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.
MidCon Equipment Co.
John Deere Insurance Co.
A-$94,450.00
B-$104,450.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.
-----------------~--------------------------------------------------------
7 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
9.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.
-------------------------------------------------------------~------------
I hereby certify that this is a
true and correct tabulation of- the
bid as received on January 20, -1989
*Denotes Corrected Figure
By: :DJfr
BID TABULATION
for
ONE (1) NEW DIESEL POWERED ONE-TON FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TRUCK
FOR THE
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Bids Opened:
Friday, January 20, 1989, 10~3Q A.M.
Vendor
Bid Security
Total Bid
1.
Boyer Ford Trucks
Capitol 5%
$16,389.00
2.
Lake1and Truck Center
NO BID
3.
Tonka Ford
- NO BID BOND
$17,885.00
4.
5 .
6 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------.--
8.
9.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that this is a
true and correct tabulation if the
bid as received on January 20, -1989
*Denotes Corrected Figure
By: ])A..~ ~/lif
6..,74;JJ/lJiS~1L
.'
/
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BRAD NIELSEN
DATE: 19 JANUARY 1989
RE: PROPOSED HIGHWAY SIGNAGE PLAN
FILE NO.: 405 (Transportation)
MNDOT proposes to replace and add signs along Highway 7, west of T.H. 41. In
summary, all signs which exist today will remain, plus they propose to identify
all intersections with the hi~hway. Currently only select intersections are
identified.
I would appreciate your input relative to this matter at Monday night's
meeting.
BJN:ph
cc: Jim Norton
Glenn Froberg
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
!I/f
.#
"
f!+\~%I'f ~
Ji ~
i ~
~ OF Tfl.t-y."
.
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
.
NOV r 4 1988
(612)593- 8752
November lO, 1988
Dan Vogt
City of Shorewood
5755 Country Club Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Re: Sign Replacement
Dear Mr. Vogt:
I am working on a sign replacement project along
from T.H. 41 on the east to T.H. 25 on the west.
are two (2) copies of the project which covers a
Highway 7 within your city limits.
The signs which are penciled in are my suggestions. The
remainder of the signs are inplace at this time. Please
feel free to study the layout and make recommendations.
Make changes in pencil that you would like to revise and
return a copy to me. Give me a call at this office if you
have any questions.
Highway 7
Enclosed
portion of
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
4~*~
Kirk A. Hinson
Traffic Engineering
Enclosure:
KAH:pl
An Equal Opportunity Employer
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MINUTES
.
.
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCIL
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 · (612) 474-3236
Mayor and Counci1members
Dan Vagt ~
J~ary 19, 1989
Suggestions For The Future
As the Special Council meeting minutes of January 18, 1989, indicate, I
would suggest hiring someone from outside of the staff to take various
Council and Commission minutes. Cost savings, efficiency, and more work
production from employees being in the office rather than out on comp time
due to night meetings are big advantages to this proposal. Also, staff
will be able to review minutes more thoroughly prior to copying and dis-
tribution to the public.
I strongly encourage you to consider this proposal in the near future. It
seems to me that the advantages of this proposal far outweight any dis-
advantages. If you desire, give it a try. If it doesn't work out, go back
to the current system.
ADMINISTRATOR HIRING
Now that you are setting up dates for reviewing applications for the City
Administrator position, I would also encourage you to have someone who has
experience in local government administration review the resumes. This
person may be able to narrow the list down to the top candidates available
for the job.
GARBAGE COLLECTION
This issue will need to be addressed in 1989. After this year, yard waste
cannot be 1andfi11ed. The City and haulers need to agree on how this Law
will be complied with. What this may mean is one trip per hauler for Gar-
bage and one trip per hauler for yard waste for each customer. You may
want to ask yourselves if it makes sense for a City of 5,000 people to
have 11 licensed haulers now making double the number of trips during the
growing season on our fragile streets.
DJV/al
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
~
.I'TY OF SHOREWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, 17 JANUARY 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD
7:30 P.M.
JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
M I NUT E S
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Schultz called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Schultz; Commissioners Robertson, Spellman, Benson, Leslie; Mayor
Haugen; Councilmembers Brancel, Stover, Watten, Gagne; Planner Nielsen;
Planning Assist. Helgesen
Absent: Commissioner Mason (excused).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
,
Spellman moved, seconded by Robertson to approve the minutes of 3 January 1989 as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
1989 PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM
Bob Gagne said he feels ther~ is a need for senior housing in Shorewood. Members present
agreed and considered contac~ing a developer to represent an application for same.
Haugen suggested that the Ci~y contact potential neighbors to such a use and educate them
before contacting developers. Various sites were considered and it was noted that any
site would need to be close to shopping, banks and medical facilities. The City could
consider bonding or tax increment financing, etc. as means of encouraging developers.
Jan Haugen said that during her campaign she discovered that it appears residents would
like to see the City take neighborhood surveys to determine what the people would like to
~see fill the vacant land around them.
Watten said the Comprehensive Plan should be modified to show the sites appropriate for
various land uses, such as senior housing and rezoned where appropriate.
Items needing study by the Planning Commission were prioritized as follows:
1) Subdivision Ordinance.
2) Needs Analysis for Public Works Department.
3) Rental Housing Ordinance.
4) Senior Housing.
5) By-laws for Planning Commission.
The Zoning Ordinance is an on-going study, and the Comprehensive Plan will be ready for
study by mid-year. Schultz said that the Planning Commission should meet twice a month
indefinitely until all study items are resolved.
Members present briefly discussed how a rental housing ordinance should be approached.
It was determined that goals must first be established.
~
Mi~utes
Planning Commission Meeting
17 January 1989
VARIANCE POLICY DISCUSSION
Discussion on variances was brought up to help alleviate discrepancies between the
thinking of the Planning Commission and Council.
Planner Nielsen explained that some of the reasons for building setbacks were for safety
purposes such as distance from buildings to streets, and building to building; open
space; and to preserve vegetation and accommodate drainage. Planner Nielsen presented
slides showing examples of where buildings and outdoor storage were located right next to
the street.
Nielsen reported that the Zoning Ordinance is a law, not merely a guideline. Standards
must be set in a reasonable manner which apply to everybody.
Nielsen referenced the memo by the City Attorney dated 11/3/87 defining undue hardship.
Nielsen cited some examples of variances granted where reasonable use of the property
could have been made without the variance. These were cases where the Planning
Commission voted to recommend denial of the variance, and the Council approved.
Haugen said that staff and the Planning Commission do not tell the Council what to do,
they are there to advise. Schultz reminded the Council that the Zoning Ordinance is a
law which applies to them as well as the Planning Commission.
Members present discussed that there are various ways of interpreting reasonable use.
The Council agreed to refer back questionable variance requests.
It was further noted that the City Attorney had advised that voting on variances should
always be done for the original request. A modified version of the request as a result
of recommendations, etc. should be voted on separately.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMUNICATION
Haugen urged the Planning Commission to inform the Council of any concerns they have.
MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
Schultz said he thinks the City should determine how the increased development has
affected revenues and what the City is doing with that revenue.
REPORTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Leslie moved, seconded by Spellman to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 P.M. Motion carried
unanaimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Patti Helgesen
Planning Assistant
- 2 -
KELLY LAW OFFICES
~.
,..' \ -~~~"
WILLIAM F. KELLY
MARK W. KELLY
351 SECOND STREET
EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331
,6121474-5977
December 27, 1988
Mr. Gregory S. Withers, City Manager
City of Excelsior
339 Third Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
Re: SLMPSD Lease
,
Dear Gregg:
In looking at the marked lease of 12-19-88 and following our
telephone conversation relative to the addition to the paragraph on
page 2 under 3. Base Rent, I felt that the additiort as proposed by
the attorneys for Shorewood and Tonka Bay was not satisfactory and
did not meet the intent of the Greenwood council. We do not wish to
prepay rentals. We wish to prepay principal as provided in the
amortization schedule and be relieved of interest.. The prepayment
would not be made by the Lessee, but rather would be made by the
individual cities making up the Lessee body.
I would suggest the following in place of the sentence which was
included:
You can decide if you want to provide for a copy of notices to Mr.
Barrett and whether or not copies of notices should be mailed to each
of the attorneys for each of the respective cities. I would prefer
that attorneys names be left out of this agreement entirely and
notices be forwarded only to the parties signing the lease, including
each of the cities who consent to terms of the lease. That would
mean, of Course, notices sent to the three cities, as well as to
Excelsior and the Coordinating Committee.
Would you let me know if I can submit the lease as amended.
jiB
~
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
MAYOR
Robert Rascop
COUNCI L
Jan Haugen
Kristi Stover
Robert Gagne
Barb Brancel
ADMINISTRATOR
Daniel J. Vogt
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD . SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 . (612) 474-3236
MEMO TO: Mayor and Counci1members
FROM: Sandra Kennelly and Brad Nielsen
DATE: January 30, 1989
SUBJECT: Acting Administrator - Interim Salary Proposal
We checked round with other Cities for a policy regarding compensation
for inter-iro Administrators. There seems to be no real policy set for
the smaller Cities. A comparison of any kind was difficult to find. As
you may recall, I was given $200.00 a month for the five month period
between Administrators four and one half years ago. I have checked three
other Cities and their method of handling the salary compensation-during
their acting Administrator periods are:
Elk River:
Mound:
Excelsior:
Proposal:
"Excelsior
and divide
City Clerk
Planner
(25% of
Contracted with a "Temporary Manager" at $150.00
a day for a six month period
The City Clerk was given $500.00 a month for a four
month period in 1985
The most current vacancy was in Excelsior in 1988.
A formula was established by Mr. Zieman as the acting
Administrator. He took 40% of the Administrators salary
and divided amongst the staff -
Acting Administrator
City Clerk
Finance Director
Remaining Staff (2)
15%)
10%)
5%
5% each
25%
Method" - we propose to use 25% of the Administrators salary
it among Clerk and Planner.
- Acting Administrator - 15% = $480.00
- Assisting - 10% = $320.00
$38,500.00 (Administrators salary) = $9,625.00 ($802.08 month)
($3210.00 a month)
"Mound Method" - City Clerk was given $500.00 a month, four years ago.
A 30% average increase in salary has occurred among the Administrator
(30%) - Planner (36%) and Clerk (24%) during this period of time:
$500.00 plus 30% $650.00
Clerk (15%) $390.00
Planner (10%) = $260.00
A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore
Acting Administrator - Interim Salary Proposal
Page 2
These are examples of the only comparison I was able to obtain. I did
not call larger Cities as I felt they could not be comparable.
We appreciate any consideration you take regarding this compensation.
Respectfully submitted,
SK/BN.a1
-.". '.
, ,-
Johnson and Uedl Appraisal
real estate valuation and consultation
JA,., !
8 1988
32 Tenth Avenue South
.
Suite 210
.
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
.
(612) 931-0240
January 16, 1989
Mr. Glenn Froberg
Froberg & Penberthy
Attorneys for the City of Shorewood
Re: 5 parcels on Wedgewood Drive
Easement Appraisals
Shorewood, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Froberg:
I would like to thank you for the opportunity to meet your
appraisal needs regarding the valuation of the permanent
easements. There are five parcels of property that the city of
Shorewood will have to acquire for right-of-way in conjunction
with a project to straighten Wedgewood Drive. It is my
understanding that an appraisal is required to determine the fair
market value of the easements.
Our services could begin in mid February with a notification
of the owners, an inspection of the properties, gathering and
analysis of market data, and completion of the narrative
appraisals. Based on a prelimary investigation, it appears that
there is no severance damage to the properties. However, in the
event of court testimony, a complete before and after appraisal
may be required at additional cost.
The appraisal methodology would emphasize the market
approach concentrating on land sales in the Shorewood/Lake
Minnetonka area. Assuming the owner's cooperation, we anticipate
the reports to be delivered by the end of February.
said completion dates are estimates and do not take into
consideration delays beyond the control of the appraiser, such as
illness, lack of client response for requested data, and Acts of
God.
The fee for our appraisal services will range from $350 per
parcel. Assuming all 5 parcels are appraised, the total fee
would be $1,750. This fee is due upon delivery of the reports.
It is understood and agreed that this fee is not contingent upon
and bears no relationship to the estimated value to be reported.
Interest of 1.5% per month will accrue beginning 30 days from
date of delivery on any balance for compensation due and
remaining unpaid. It is agreed that reasonable collection
expenses such as court costs and attorney's fees will be paid by
you should such services become necessary.
Jeffrey A. Johnson, MAl, ASA
Cletus C. Liedl, MAl, SRPA
~- - :'*
Or
Should additional services be requ~red such as court
testimony and pre-trial meetings, the appra~ser, upon reasonable,
notification, will be available for such purpose. The fee for
these additional services would be estimated at that time.
If you have any questions concerning the terms of this
proposal, please contact me. If this proposal meets with your
approval, then please sign this letter which will serve as your
authorization for us to proceed with this appraisal and return
one copy to me.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to present our
valuation services.
Respectfully submitted,
Johnson and Liedl Appraisal
ttk t:-~
Cletus C. Liedl, MAl
Partner
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED:
by:
date: